Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWZ-92-7 The Cify of ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS APPLICATION Wheat ~Rid~re Department of Planning and Development b 7500 West 29th Ave., Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Phone (303) 237-6944 - Applicant Richard Todd ....Address, 8600 Ralston Rd. Phone 424-1322 Owner Phillip G. Haas Address 8600 Ealston Rd. phone 424-1322 Location of request 5000 Robb Street Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request.) _ _ Change of zone or zone conditions Variance/Waiver Site development plan approval Nonconforming use change- - _ Special use permit Flood plain special: exception Conditional use permit Interpretation of .code _-_ Temporary use/building permit Zone line modification Minor subdivision Public improvement-Exception Subdivision _ _ Street vacation __ - Preliminary Miscellaneous plat Final Solid waste landfill/ [] ** See attached procedural guide. mineral extraction permit for specific requirements. ^ Other CovrM€!Lci>~ Detailed Description of request Planned.=~~~s-tz~ Development to condtruct four (4) office/wharehouse type buildings List all persons and companies who hold an interest in the described real property, as owner, mortgagee, lessee, optionee, etc. NAME `ADDRESS PHONE Same as above I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted- are_true and correct--to the best -of my knowiedge.and that in filing this applioation,,I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those__persons listed above, without whose consent the requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants-other than owners must submit power-of=attorney £rom the .owner which approved of this act(~ion on his behalf. Signature of, Applicant. ~'\~ ~~ _ , __ Subsc~i,beti and sworn to me this o2~~ay off C.~G~ 19 ~_ No y lic SEAL My commission expires- Date Received Receipt No. case No. f- ~- CASE. NQ. WZ-X32-7. (" ~ ~ IXHIBIT 'C' R ~'7'~ ENGINEERING ~ SURVEYING, INC. ENGINEERING • SURVEYING • CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AUGUST 21, 1992 MEMORANDUM: NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING T0: MS_ MERIDETH RECKERT CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, PLAN G D PARTMENT FROM: J. CLIFFORD MCKISSACK R&W ENGINEERING AND SU VE G, INC. SUBJECT: REZONING OF PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 4976 AND 5000 ROBB STREET FROM A-1 TO PID_ DATE: JULY 23, 1992 TIME: 7:00 P.M_ LOCATION: 8600 RALSTON ROAD - RE/MAX WEST OFFICE BUILDING NEIGHBORS ATTENDING: SEE ATTACHED SHEET The neighborhood meeting was held to inform the residents of the intent of the developer to rezone the subject property from its existing A-1 zone to PID. The intent of the rezoning is to allow the construction of four (4) warehouse buildings (with small office spaces) which range in size from 3,000 square feet to 12,000 square feet. (See attached exhibits). We informed the neighbors present of the process the City requires a property to follow when requesting a zone change and that the neighborhood meeting is the first step in that process. We informed the neighbors that they also have the opportunity to express their concerns, if any, at the Planning Commission public hearing, and also at the City Council public hearing., There was an introduction of the proposed project_ A proposed site plan exhibit and architectural rendering elevations were presented to show the neighbors what the buildings would moat likely look like. There was a general discussion indicating the pros and cons of the project. The following is a listing of the concerns that were brought out during ,the meeting: 1. In general the project was received tentatively by the neighbors. They realize this area will be developed as we are proposing, but 'at the same time are concerned about the impacts to their neighborhood. 5151 WARD ROAD, UNIT 3 * WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80033 (303)423-3300 * FAX (303)420-4391 ~. ~. ~ ~ ~~~ 2. The acknowledged the landscaping planned and were favorable with the amount of landscaping shown, but were concerned with continued maintenance. We informed them that a Owners Association will be formed to taker of items such as these. 3. They were concerned with the fact that Valley Water District will need to extend a 16-inch water main to the project site from the south. We assured them that a traffic plan will need to be approved by the City that will insure ample access to the neighborhood. 4_ Concerns about exterior upkeep of the structures. We informed them that the unite would be individually owned, but an overall Covenant Control would be placed on the property that will address these types of concerns_ 5. Mr. Hawn was concerned about the possible contamination or affect of the development to his water well. We informed him that all precautions would be taken during the construction of the site against any such contamination_ These were the major items of concern. I have included the sign up sheet and my hand written notes for your records. I have also included a copy of the Notice of Neighborhood Input Meeting £orm that was mailed out. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please give me a call. The drainage report will be forwarded to Engineering as soon as it is completed. Sincerely- J_ C ford McKissack R&W ngineering and Surveying, Inc. cc:. Mr. Richard Todd -500 WEST 29TH AVENUE Tf7B C!'1)i Of P O. BOX 638 WHEAT RIDGE. CO 80034-0638 (3031 234-5900 ~L edl Cdy Admin. Fax # 234-5924 Police Dept. Fax # 235-2949 -Midge August 25, 1992 The Wheat Ridge Department of Community Development has received a request for annroval of a rezoning from A-1 to PCD and approval of a final at the property aescri~eu UC1UW. Your response to the following questions and any comments on this proposal would be appreciated by ~ptember 11 1992 No response from you by this date will constitute no objections or concerns regarding this proposal. CASE NO: WZ-92-7 LOCATION: 5000 Robb Street. REQUESTED ACTION: Approval of a rezoning from A-1 to PCD and approval of a combined development plan and plat PURPOSE: Construction of an office/warehouse development APPROXIMATE AREA: 3.5 acres 1. Are public facilities or services provided by your agency adequate to serve this development? YES NO If ':NO", please explain below. 2. Are service lines available to the development? , YES NO If "NO", please explain below. 3. Do you have adequate capacities to service the development? YES NO If "NO", please explain below. 4. Can and will your agency service this proposed development subject to your rules and regulations? YES NO If "NO", please explain below. 5. Are there any concerns or problems your agency has identified which, would or should affect approval of this request? -.7 Please reply to: rl~~L,!' ~~-t2T-wc. bi. Reckert Department of Planning & Development DISTRIBUTION: X Water District (Valley ) X Sanitation District (Fruitdal~ X Fire District( Arvada ') X Adjacent City (Arvada ) X public Service Co. X US West Communications State Land Use Commission State Geological Survey Colorado Dept. of Transportation <pc>referralform 06-26-92 X American Cable Vision Jefferson Co. Health Dept. Jefferson Co. Schools Jefferson Co. Commissioners Wheat Ridge Post Office Wheat Ridge Police Dept. X Wheat Ridge Public Works Dept. X Wheat Ridge Parks & Recreation X Colorado Div. of Wildlife Wheat Ridge Bldg. Division ?~ DATE: September ~ 1992 TO: Meredith Reckerti Deot of Plan /Dev ~ City of Wheatridae FROM: Rov R Grafton Engineering Supervisor, NMR SUBJ: C~nital Improvement Propo<a' Rera;yorl in Engineering PROPOSAL NAME: Case dk WZ-9t 7 ADDRESS: SL~Dt~ Robb -Street GOVERNING AUTHORITY: City of Wheatridge DATE RECEIVED IN ENGINEERING: August 31, 1992 I have reviewed the site plans far this proposal. P.S.Co does have adequate facilities in the area to serve this customer. Some e:;tensiona relocation or reinforcement of our facilities may be necessary however. Thanks ~~ Roy R.`Crafto ?"~r, ~. ' ~F c ~~''J ~~~~!~~R~D E rp® ~~; Z 1j92 _ ~f~~~~~ ~oP~~~ STATE OF COLORADO Roy Romer, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WILDLIFE AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Perry D. Olson, Director 6060 Broadway Denver, Colorado 80216 Telephone: (303) 297-7192 September 1, 1992 Meredith Reckert Dept. of Planning and Development 7500 West 29th Avenue P.O. Box 638 Wheat Ridge, CO 80034-0638 Re: Case Number WZ-92-7 Dear Ms. Reckert: REFER TO For ~Idlife- For People The above mentioned proposed development will have an impact on wildlife, but the impact should not be significant. The property is mainly covered by weedy vegetation and trees. The trees do offer significant wildlife habitat and should be protected if at all possible. The proposed spring detention area will benefit wildlife more if it is in a natural state: If the detention area is constructed in a artificial medium (ie. concrete), the use by wildlife will be minimal. Currently the area is used occasionally by many species including, foxes, raccoons, skunks, deer and many species of birds. Again, if the trees can be maintained, and the detention area constructed in a natural state, the impact of -this proposed development on wildlife should be minimal. Thank you for this opportunity to comment on land use issues in the city of Wheat Ridge. Sinc rely. ~ /~ 1 ~1/~~I ts1 John Hood District Wildlife Manager CITY OF WHEAT rRIDGE S~F 0 41992 -i"1 ~, s i ` I i .l..1-TL & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Kenneth Salazar, Executive Director WILDLIFE COMMISSION, William R. Hegberg, Member • Eldon W. Cooper, Chairman ~ Felix Chavez, Member • Rebecca L. Frank, Member Louis. F. Swift, Member • George Van DenBerg, Member • Larry M. Wright, Member • Thomas'M. Eve, Member City of Arvada 8101 Ralston Road P. O. Box 8101 Arvada, Colorado 80001-8101 September 4, 1992 Meredith M. Reckert City of Wheat Ridge Department of Community Deveiopment 7500 West 29 Avenue, P.O. Box 638 Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80034-0838 planning Department (303) 431-3020 Fax: (303)431-3085 C?TY OF WHEAT RIDGE SEP 0 31992 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Re: Case No. WZ-92-97, Plaza 5000 Business Center, Rezoning Final Development Plan/Plat Dear Ms. Reckert, The City of Arvada has received the above referral for a rezoning and final development plan/plat to allow construction of an office/warehouse development on four platted lots. The site which is located south of Ridge Road on Robb Street is located just outside of the City of Arvada growth limits and is adjacent to the City of Arvada along its north boundary. That portion of Arvada which is adjacent to the site is zoned PUD-I for Planned Office/Industrial Parks. After review of the plans it appears that this development would be compatible with future development which may occur adjacent to it in the City of Arvada. The referral was distributed to the appropriate departments within the city. The staff does not foresee any concerns at this time. However, one comment was made in reference to this development by the Engineering Division as follows: Development should meet criteria and master plan of the Columbine Basin by UDFCD/City of Wheat Ridge/City of Arvada. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this case if you have any questions please contact Gregg Lair at 431-3020. Sincerely, ~, ~~ reg it Planner cc: Mike Smith, Manager of Planning and Zoning '~~ Arvada Fire Protection District FIRE MARSHALS' OFFICE P, O. Box 3-D ARVADA,COLORAD080001 Telephone (303) 425.0850 - FAX (303) 422-4569 September 8, 1992 Ms. Meredith.Reckert Wheat Ridge Department of Community Development 7500 W. 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO. 80034 RE: Plaza 5000 Preliminary Plat Dear Meredith, We have reviewed the Preliminary Plat for this project and have the following comments. 1. Fire protection is provided to this site by Station 2, 12iy5 W. 52nd Ave. and Station 1, 790D W. 57th Ave. 2. Emergency access lanes will need to be dedicated on the rinai Development Plan. 3. The proposed water line in front of Building one and between Buildings 1 and Two appear to be dead end lines and will need to be looped as required by the Denver Water Board and the Valley Water District.. 4. Preliminary hydrant locations do not appear to be sufficient but additional comments will be made when the construction- type of the proposed buildings is submitted. The required fire flows and distribution of hydrants will be determined. UFC 88 10.301(a),(c). Appendix III-A. 5. Trash enclosures including doors will need to be of non combustible construction. UFC 88 11.201(b). 6. Additional comments will be made at.the time. of the Finai Plat. Sincerely, Arvada Fire Protection District =- - Steve Steig d -- Deputy Fire arshal Approved Date ' TO: Meredith Reckert, Planner FROM: Steve Nguyen, Civil Engineer DATE: September 8, 1992 ., ~~11 ! i~.l..!.~~. R SEP ®v 1992 ~l ~~~~ ~~ .PLANNING & 9EVELOPMENT SUBJECT: 5000 Robb Street, WZ-92-7. Approval of a rezoning from A-1 to PCD and approval of a combined development plan and plat I have reviewed the above referenced plan and have the following comments: 1. We will require a drainage report. 2. We will require a curb and gutter plan on Robb Street front- age. 3. Thirty (30) feet of right-of-way is needed on Robb Street frontage. We will also require thirty (30) feet of R.O.W. along the north property line and a development agreement for the future construction of W. 50th Avenue as a collector street. 4. Chuck has checked the plat and has the following comments: ~ MEMORAN©UM ~ Individual lots need bearings. Point of beginning needs to be indicated on the draw- ing. The dedicatory statement shall be labeled "Dedicated by this plat" or "Hereby dedicated". Dimension 226 is incorrect with respect to dimension 256. 5. The developer will need to make sure there is adequate sight distance available for the driveway on Robb Street. cc: Karl Buchholz, Traffic Engineer STATE OF COLORADO EXECUTIVE CHAMBERS ~ 36 State Capitol Denver, Colorado 802 03-1 79 2 Phone (303) 866-2477 September 21, 1992 Meredith Reckert Department of Planning and Development 7500 W. 29th Ave. P.O. Box 638 Wheat Ridge, CO 80034-0638. Dear Ms. Reckert: This letter. acknowledges receipt the application which pertains to Colorado Land Use Commission does of information regarding Case_No. WZ-92-7. The not have any specific comments regarding same at this time. Thank you for-the submittal. IP you have any questions, please contact me at 866-2155. Sincerely, Cam- --.,' t Cole Finegan Chief Legal Counsel CF:lan 04 ~~~ a`~ - ky ~~~*i + ~' ~ I876 Roy Romer Governor r~`" OE tij~c~,,T RiRGE S~~ 2 3 1992 P-AIyNING & DEVELOPMENT :, 750D WEST 29TH AVENUE - The City of P.O. BOX 638 (~~~L, WHEAT RIDGE. CO 80034-0638 (303) 234-5900 - V i~ lle8t City Admin. Fax # 234-5924 Police Dept. Fax;, 235-2949. •'~• 1Cigt? September 14, 1992 Mr. Cliff McKissack 5151 Ward Road, Unit #3 Wheat Ridge CO 80033_"` . Dear Cliff: This letter is in regard to your submittal for rezoning, site plan review and subdivision for property located at 5000 Robb Street. I hare reviewed your submittal and have found that the following must be added to the face of the official development plan: 1. Since this is a rezoning, the title should read "Plaza 5000 Business Center", "A Combined Outline and Final Development Plan", "An Official Development Plan in the City of Wheat Ridge". ~~ >}C 2. v~ x3. ti r X 4. 5. y~ 6. x7. X8. ~, 9 . Is the structure in Lot 1 existing? If so it should be noted as such. If this is a new structure, the setback should be ,30 eet from Robb Street right-of-way. ~ ~ ~zfl Ownership/unified control statement. Explanation of the character of the development; Adjacent zoning, and land use. A list of the allowed uses - "Uses shall be allowed in Z ~ - Z accordance with•^-~ ~^a ^-'' zoning pursuant to Section~'.~i?- -ax~6=2]-of the City~of•Wheat Ridge Code of Laws". Development phase. ~ Owners' certification. Certification of Planning Commission,. Planning & Development Director and City Council. X10. Recorder's certificate. ~( 11. Does the Swadley Ditch easement go onto this property? If so, it should be shown. }(12. The following note relating to signage "All signage shall be in accordance with City of Wheat Ridge Code of Laws Chapter 26, Article IV". X 13. The following note relating to shall be in accordance with the Laws Section 26-32". landscaping "All landscaping City of Wheat Ridge Code of Co r.,. l~ • Mr. Cliff McKissack September 14, 1992 Page 2 x(14. All proposed outside storage must been screened with six- foot-high solid fencing. -F 15. The following note relating to outdoor lighting: "All exterior lighting shall be in accordance with the City of Wheat Ridge Code of Laws Section 26-20(s)". X16. Maximum building height: D~17. Is the area of the building footprint the same as maximum total building area? p(18. Elevations of the typical structure to be built or at least a verbal description of the architectural style, materials to be used, etc. 'x 19. What about a six-foot-high solid fence along the southern property line? ~ 20. Address and phone number for the owners and surveyor. X 21. Statement regarding 100-year floodplain. The following shall be added to the platting document: x 1. Title shall read: "Plaza 5000 Business Center Subdivision". X 2. The scale of the drawing must be added. x 3. Case history box. x4. Address and phone number of the surveyor. X 5. Signature block for the City Engineer should be changed to the Director of Planning & Development. X 6. Show the existing structure on Lot 1 - to remain or to be removed? X 7. Show point of beginning. X 8. The right-of-way for Robb Street should be shown as "hereby dedicated". x'9. Cross access easement; see attached language. `~C10. Detention easement; see attached language. Attached are responses from other service agencies. Their concern should be addressed. GA~'c 't~Slti1{i U~-~ - °12 - ~. z. . • Mr. Cliff McKissack September 14, 1992 Page 3 Keep in mind that we will be recommending a 30-foot-wide dedication for West 50th Avenue along the northern property line. You may want to be considering alternate designs as a dedication will drastically alter your current submittal. We are looking at a tentative Planning Commission public hearing on October 15. Therefore, I will need to have the revised plans in the office, at the latest, by October 15. If you have questions concerning any of the above, please contact me at 235-2848. Sincerely, ~~~~, Meredith Reckert Planner MR:slw attachments NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge. Planning Commission on October 15, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. at 7500 west 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. The following petitions shall be heard: 1. -Case No Wz-92-7• An application by Richard Todd for Phillip G. Haas for approval of a rezoning from Agricultural-One (A-1) to Planned Commercial Development (PCD) and for approval of a combined outline and final development plan and plat. Said property is located at 5000 Robb Street and is legally described as follows: A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE SW1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST, OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. SAID TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST N89026'26"E, 663.61 FEET A POINT OF BEGINNING' THENCE N00°17'51"W, 229.60 THENCE N89029'40"E, 664.19 THENCE 500016'19"E, 229.60 THENCE S89°29'40"W, 664.09 SAID TRACT CONTAINING 3.50 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE VD N00017'51"W, 1090.60 FEET TO THE TRUE FEET; FEET; FEET; FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING ACRES, MORE OR LESS. 2. Case No. WV-92-2• An .application by Terry J. Ammon for approval of a right-of-way vacation for an unused portion of Union Street. Said property is adjacent to Lot 54 of Applewood Village 2nd Filing Subdivision and is legally described as follows: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST, THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 615.31 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH Oo 14 FEET EAST A DISTANCE OF 106.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 890 28.1 WEST A DISTANCE OF 30 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 41 FEET WEST A DISTANCE OF 106.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 890 28.1 EAST A DISTANCE OF 30 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF CONTAINING 3196.5 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. Sandra Wiggins, /e tary ATTEST: Wanda Sang, City Clerk To be Published: October 1, 1992 Wheat Ridge Sentinel <pc>pnwz927/wv922 7500 WEST297H AVENUE The Clty Of P.O. BOX 638 WHEAT RIDGE. CO 80034-0638 (303) 234-5900 heat City Admin. Fax#234-5924 Police Dept. Fax#235-2949 Ridge September 30, 1992 This is to inform you that Case No. WZ-92-7 which is a request for approval of a rezonina from A-1 to PCD and for approval of a combined outline and final develenmPn elan and nTat for property located at 5000 Robb Street will be heard by the Wheat Ridge Plannina Commission in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex, 7500 West 29th Avenue at 7:30 p.m. , on October 15, 1992 All owners and/or their legal counsel of the parcel under consideration must be present at this hearing before the Planning~ommission• As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Rearing and/or submit written comments. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to notify any other persons whose presence is desired at this meeting. If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division. Thank you. PLANNING DIVISION <pc>phnoticeform' Ca r.-., N w ~~ N ~ k ~%~~ ~~ ~ ~ C ~ >_ .fir N N Q L!~ G ~ O y ~ N O m ~ ~ E o m ~ m ~ N Q.. 32 a m $ o~¢cc3~ m m m ~^ ~ Z Rl O ~ N N ~ U d am` m .E ~ V y g F ~ ~ -pp o d o~m 9N9? q~~ VN~~ n a~~ ('P% ~ S ~s~ v F r ~dm i?9 ' ~ m ~~'~ ~ ~ 1~ ~ N ~ N p ~ ~ E->. ~ ~ ~ ~ '2 ~ °,$' ~'3 33 °m `o 'S~a ~ I}~ NS0 OS; ~ ~ M ~ 8&$ Mpg o .Q +i A~ - ~ Ep~ I .V.=~ ~~2 ~Z ¢ Yom' +µ~~ ~~/ ry QddTC. QV n€n€c N f v1~~~9~~~a ty ~ ~I 1 I ~I 1 I N ~~ = X ~ T ~ ul N 4 N N Q ~ O UI ~ h ~ rJ m a m ~ s N m ~ E fi.1 3 ~ 9 y Q D" obi ¢¢ ~ a R1 NCI^^ G ~ fU -'i ~ z o- O ~ N ~ o ~ a Q a ~ E % ~ m g o d ~y'~ N 9pN>N V up~9 yUN* nS O ~~~ E ~30 S oy ash D W n U T v 10! > l~l n V a ~`-- ~~ 8`~'_ fY " a ~ ~ y - E G _ o L =v~ E~ b t boa q_ 4f o o ~ c ~@1i me N'aE o~' oc~ F 3 ~Q ~+ d O „ a s ~ ~~ oc h : '~. ~ w~ ¢ . r~~ a ¢ ~ C'J ~ d`{ 3 ' v vp~ 2 L~d- ~ N -U py ~ E ly/ { . Iy A i F 3 ~ ¢ ~ . ~y ~ ^ 4 p ~ Vn~ ~ ¢ •~~~.~~~~C ) 1 w ° C3 Gs ~ ~ ~ ~ W? ¢ ~ CD W _ ^^^VVV ~ a ~ n j S N S ~ w N }~ ^t V W b~ GG O~ Z V ~ ,q W 0 1 ~ 00 DSO W ~ ~ z F = .N M W YLw CY ~ffi V ~w o _ g y .Q 1V < w ~ F O / r7 Os ,4` v Z &t 'k1' i$. r U ¢ W h ~ { z w F 0 8 ~ o ~ = U Q C q ~~ aMe~/~ sY ~[ -~r$ C9 - .`~ja Ai 3D W N w N ~ h N ~.. N ~ ~? j ~ , m „ rv a ro ¢ -' ~ U ~ N O .U. ~ o m ~ E C ~ > a ~ ~ ~ n om ¢¢ a ~ rr7 N N ~ ^ ~ C 3 ~ z e- D '- (V N O V d a` E = ~ w - ~ o f b 9 j > N C VCp ry0p 3 p = N t 6 i r I (~I yy yM i ~ ~ ~i W p1 i ~ a Q w N ~a ~ ~ D ~ a N m N ,~ y .~ ~ J a Z ,~ O N 82~ th o _ ~QC R y oa- ~ ~ ~ m d W u 5 v. .~ h ~ a'~g-' c E~~ wI ~ ~? w °m `a `o ° ° ~ ~ ~ I N Pam -~° }4 ~ 3Y . y ~''s9 ° c~3 ~ ~ Q! Y+ m ~~ o v ¢ m o ~ ~ I ~ 'q nF 2 o' - °LL ~ ~ mS m +$ ( E~ ~ C _ ` ~ ~ r~ •~ 1 M rn ~ o f CYi I U S _W W U w SR~ CQ N wP LL $G~ Z 5o LL U O oy ~ 8 ~ a ~Q € ~ ~ a v j W ~j e ¢ h ~ ~ LL5 X26 E2.6 r; 5L5 026 E.26 d ~ a, W U =I~ *~n ~I 59 351 I ~. M M C.9 ~ O V " A J w t . i N ~ p V` .p . p W W I ~ Q1 ~' a~ *d ~ `~ ~ C? ~ ~ hi V' ~ 9L5 X26 E26 d m Q k w U W O W `m a 7 Z m E C O ~ LL c6 a LO r a w V W O W M O a o ~ m ai m a Q ~ ~ m d h °d :? ul o o" d ~ E O N 3° -o .N n Q" o y ¢ ¢ ~ a m m cI ^ ^ ~ ~ ~ _ o ^ N ~ a ~ z o ¢ d E ~ g F C c C 9 o~v ~'~~- ~ ws ~ x~ ~ ~~~ E` ~ o $? v m oa, v ~ ~ o n ~' ~ _ .~~~ 4 E~~ v v = . °Y~ °m o` `a ~ '~@ 5 ~ w ~ ; ~a ° g ~vi oa $ h 'tf y E¢~ ai a W LL W ~ U - ~~ ~ "` v n >~ O ~h ~ ~' ~ v a9'y1 yUt C4 A W LS e-t •~9~~• IVIUI UIU 2 N <F¢ Q Zw Q 00 ~3o E oW ~ g ~io~ o ' z a (ifif{ ~ U- E ww~ w ~~ X ~ ~ ~ T ~ ~ > ~ v m $ ~ o N Y p N ~ ~ N ~ W m ~ d E h g N A V ~ Q Q' t ~ m ~ °~ n ¢ ¢ a ~ R~ ~ ~^ C 3 m N z p- O " N d a E n ~ F £ v~ $ m 3 w°4 ~ H Yv ~~~ o ~~8 r V a v~ ~.~.~ .~ ~ ~ ~' xx E~S ~ ~ , ~o~ ~ o o~a ~ '/ I~~ ~~; ~} ~~ v~~ P _ ~ a g'v 1YP 0 W - o ~ > ~~ 'm ~ o a n '~s :~ O O GY! m p ti tT pN `!~ V- U °~ P,t ~ Qll0 ~ ~' Q 4, t¢~-~ ~ ~ -P 4A. ~N~~~9~~~oIM ~~ f , . a ~ r ~ d ~. ~, ~ ~ ri~ L, !0 ! @? i ~ ~ f t ~ ~ N N W d ~~ 1 W ~ ~ @ 7 G r ~ ~ ~ I 6L5.026 E26 di (9 V U w 2 w w ~ o ~ = -= ~ U w w ~ w p) R y pj K m ~, °? O m ~ d `p N ~ ~ ~ ~ m °' E ~ N 3 > a m o ~ , o m ¢rc o,°' `m a m ~ n ° ' - 3 U V ~ z N v. f O o ¢ d a ,E ~ ~ F ~ ~ o ssa ~ aE ~ . m ~~-~, mdo t -~~ V U~~ a a ¢ w W ~- ~ 0 U~ T , ¢ U m ~, ~ o ~ ~ O m r n o D a r o ~Ov s Vvm ~'nt ~ ` RI 4 n ~ ~ $~ ~F y ~ '~ . ~ r 0 5 ~' o a Qb ~ !;a ~ c , 9 n a N ~y ~y `a a$ ¢ ~ ~ LTt g' w 6 ~ p `~`~°m o°a "~ ~ W ~C l H ~ ^ ii y fIY p y Sv`=z¢ ~ v ~ r r~ d= ~+}} S pno ~'O ~ ^4-~ M wEEC mro u U ic~ga ~a~~v< w V ro~~•9~~~aei a m VIUIUIU :~. ~ ,~~ ~ 1S P'Y" w G ¢¢ O ~ I ~~ ~ i a ® ~ :~ w '/ ~ x I a sa r to V3 0o < I ~N ~ : ~o w LL C V y A ~ a' ~ ~ N LL a r ~ RS • t f $ =so d ~ ri .71 z -,••v ~ MAORgF ,{~~ 'y(V~~ C} ~yq. ,yam t J +Gf 4"i 4i Nf I F U 2 }' ¢ ¢ h I QL5 026 E26 d~' ,} ~, LT ~ }~ ri ... ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~. Ct ~..` ~ R ~ !p q wT~ y V > 1 f ' Mi ~ ~' j k~] e A 4` e;7 T'I ~ N iWf OR5 026 c2~ d O N 1 C O N Z a T T E M 2 o E ~ LLL N cd a a a w U W m LL Cn a , ~ ~ ~ a e~ ~ x m ~ S ~i '~"~~yA V ~ dm ¢' ' mod ~ ' e 2 ~ m ~ ~ ^ F a ! ° m y~ E d" IL W ~ m h L ~ ro D . U V U N p m U m U) r ( ~~ m ~ O m? W O '. -- d m P: ~ ~ ¢ a ~ ¢ ~ ~ 8 ~t =; ~ o , j ~ $E~ ' ~ n~ sip ~ B~~ A o `` s o~~ ' ~ ~ I 2 'o ~ n'~ ~ „ v ~~~~ C7 O .... 8'r o `~ ~ E=~ ~ v m :4 t ~ o.g ~. ~ ~ n ~ o 'S~a Q ~ ~ a NaW - ~ ' ~ ~ ~ m ~ E y °° v t ~ a M J Gal ~ ~ o ~g~g o~n ~ 4 ¢ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ o~~ m [ o E~ I ` ¢ a ~ m~m .t2yE ` `ry ~ w m > N I 1 -¢KLN t Qn4p~ W a ~ C C woE~ ~ I mm_~? r~ ~ ^Y O7 6~ l FF U(J¢~<$P O6 (n (IJ W ~ t„~~~9~~~'8M ~f1 t0 d . ( ~ w o ~ ¢~ ~~ w ~~ ¢~ ~ [ ~ ~ N ~~ G£ - I e ry ~ u o _ W ~ v 8 fw a ~0 7.5 4i £" oo LL ~ a O +l7 0 ~ " 0 Lp 1~ C3 [H ~ ~ wi ~ Q o o L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ (7 ~ U ~ O • CC z r w ~- g v '!'~ 1C '~ ~ O LL Z w ~ tai CQ d w w ~ - ¢ ¢ m ... C 4L5 0 26 E26 d .. _ i • 5D0 WEST 29TH AVENUE The City Of P.O. BOX 638 WHEAT RIDGE. CO 80034-0638 {3031 234-5900 (Z x ~L eat City Admin. Fax # 234-5924 Police Dept. Fax # 235-2949 _ V~V lildge October 26, 1992 ~ ~~~'~'i~i_~ ~;; ~ ~ ~~,`-3 The Wheat Ridge Department of Community Development has received a request for a roval of a rezonin from A-1 to PCD and approval of a final dpQPlOnmerit Plan an p at at the property described below. Your response to the following questions and any comments on this proposal would be appreciated by November 9. 1992 No response from you by this date will constitute no objections or concerns regarding this proposal. CASE NO: WZ-92-7 LO%ATIOiv: ~uDu Ro:~b Street REQUESTED ACTION: Approval of a rezoning from A-1 to PCD and approval of a combined development plan and plat. THIS IS A REVISED SUBMITTAL SHOWING A STREET DEDICATION ALONG THE NORTH SIDE. PURPOSE:-Construction of an office/warehouse development APPROXIMATE AREA: 3.5 acres 1. Are public facilities or services provided by your agency adequate to serve this development? YES NO X If "NO", please explain below. 2. Are service lines available to the development? YES NO X If "NO", please explain below. 3. Do you have adequate capacities to service the development? YES X NO If "NO", please explain below. 4. Can and will your agency service this proposed development subject to your rules and regulations? YES X NO If "NO", please explain below. 5. Are there any concerns or problems your agency has identified which would or shoulld affect appro`v'al~of this request? See attached letter ., Please reply toy/~~~.Lf~t ~~` M. Reckert Department of Planning & Development DISTRIBUTION: _ ~Wa e~ ~ Disc r _ -._Va11e--- ~{ American Cable Vision XX Sanitation Distr c ruitdale) Jefferson Co. Health Dept. XX Fire District ( Arvada ) Jefferson Co. Schools XX Adjacent City ( Arvada ) Jefferson Co. Commissioners XX Public Service Co. ~ Wheat Ridge Post Office XX US West Communications Wheat Ridge Police Dept. XX State Land Use Commission XX Wheat Ridge Public Works Dept. State Geological Survey Wheat Ridge Parks & Recreation Colorado Dept. of Transportation Colorado Div. of Wildlife <pc>referralform 06-•26-92 Wheat Ridge Bldg. Division ~, ,• -R - i VALLEY WATER DISTRICT P.O. BOX 9 12101 WEST 52ND AVEIQ[TE WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80034 TELEPHONE 424-9661 October 27, 1992 City of Wheat Ridge Meredith Reckert P.O. Box 638 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Dear Meredith: In reference to Plaza 5000 Business Center, Case No. WZ-92-7, I offer the following comments. Valley Water District has met again 'with Cliff McKissack and Richard Todd, representatives of Plaza 5000 Business Center and they are aware that a new 16" water mainline needs to be extended up Robb Street from the North edge of the Kunz property to the project property at 5000 Robb Street. In addition a 12" and 8" water mainline and three fire hyd- rants will be needed on site. Also, three water taps will be needed for the three buildings. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Robert-Arnold = District Manager CPTY OF WHEAT RIDGE ~ .2~n~r OCT 3 01992 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT -500 WEST 29TH AVENUE P.O. BOX 638 7772 Clty Of WHEAT RIDGE. CO 80034.0638 (3031 234-5900 cWhe at CityAdm~n.Faxz234-5924 Police Dept.Fax~235-2949 Ridge October 26, 1992 The Wheat Ridge Department of Community Development has received a request for approval of a rezoning from A-1 to PCD and approval of a final a...:.~1 nnmant Plan and plat - - - - - L,a ..=.~... ..5 ~.~.... ~.... Your, response to the following questions and any comments on this proposal. would be appreciated by _pJovember 9, 1992 No response from you by this date-will constitute no objections or concerns regarding this proposal. CASE NO: WZ-92-7 L:-n~aTlviv. ~Gw Ro., street -.- -: ._ .__ -- ---~ REQUESTED ACTION: Approval of.a rezoning from A-1 to PCD and approval of a combined development plan and plat. THIS IS A REVISED SUBMITTAL SHOWING A STREET DEDICATION ALONG.THE__NORTH SIDE. PURPOSE: Construction of an office/warehouse development - APPROXIMATE AREA: 3.5 acres 1. Are public facilities or services provided by your agency adequate to serve this development? YES NO If "NO", please explain below. 2. Are service lines available to the development? YES NO If "NO", please explain below. 3. Do you have adequate capacities to service the development? YES NO If "NO", please explain below. 4. Can and will your agency service this proposed development subject to your rules and regulations? YES NO If "NO", please explain below. 5. Are-there any concerns or problems your agency has identified which would or shoul~jd~ affect appro6val.~of -this request? See attached letter ; Please reply toy%~L(/Le~, ~~` M. Reckert Department of Planning & Development DISTRIBUTION: ;X_Water District ( Valley ) :X Sanitation District (Fruitdale) ;X Fire District ( Arvada ) ;X Adjacent City ( Arvada ) ;g Public Service Co. ;g US West Communications :X State Land Use Commission State Geological Survey Colorado Dept. of Transportation <pc>referralform 06--26-92 X,y American Cable Vision Jefferson Co. Health Dept. Jefferson Co. Schools Jefferson Co. Commissioners Wheat Ridge Post Office Wheat Ridge Police Dept. XX Wheat Ridge Public Works Dept. Wheat Ridge Parks & Recreation Colorado Div. of Wildlife -.- Wheat Ridge Hldg. Division r, -~ T0: Steve FF.'OM: Chuc k DATE: October 28, 155 Wz- °{2'~ SUHJEC:T: PLAZA 5440 BUSINESS CENTER SapO .~obb `-~' Upcm review c.f said subdivision, I find the fc~llc~wing: is bearings on East, North, °~ West lines riot to City d"atom. these are land lines: please explain difference. The difference is a matter cif seco nds but it DDES crea te a ..~Gt° mismatch at the corners. ~. not all monuments were found ar listed . 2: a monument will need to be set at the P.Q.H. per J. Oss 4: a monument will need tc. be set at the NE earner of 54th S: need bearings on interi or lc~t l ines 6: need canf'irmati~~n that City c.'f flrvada has reviewed and approved If I can answer any questi~~ns, just as4~. Ch u,. i, Mr-~t~-~-}> -Ttilese c~re_ fie, comnl~euTs v-ev~~ svbwufi-Fal sh~~n~ ab~~ tie. no,-k~l,. z+~~ . --~" cluM: • ,~ ND~:TH LINE = hl •85° ~S' 3E," E ~ WEST LINE N c]° 17~.c5" W EAST LINE = N ~l° iJ' JF.," W g2n~ev~at~e~ t1~t6/R2 sj-rr~ rv~ -i-~2. c~ ~eeJt a~icq,~c~oh pq-~ O~-f' 2~~ I adz ~a~ SlIBJ Caryital Improvement Prgpn=a~ Received In Eng+neerina Proposal NAME: ADDRESS: WZ-42-7 Gp(}C1 RotZE~ Street DESCRIPTION: Rezoning from A-1 to PCD and approval of a com5ined development plan and plat. DATE RECEIVED IN F. S. Co. ENGINEERING: t3ctober 27, 199 COMMENTS: P. S. Co. t-sas no otrjections to the proposal as shown. We do have gas and electric facilities in the gerserai area. Some e>;tensior, and reinforcement may be necessary to serve this. proposal. _ ~l~!. ~~._~•~'"* RIDGE . ~, • -u '-. `~7i-' iJ ~'1 ~PtANfdl,u u ~.'.,.`.:_'~'i'~?t`{tT •~'~~ WHEAT RIDGE ~~~.-~~nr? F? ' •~' OGT 2 91992 PLRN~41':~ t 11'`3~LQPt~ENT Than&s ~~ Roy R. Craft n STATE OF COLORADO EXECUTIVE CHAMBERS ~ 36 State Capitol Denver, Colorado 80203-1792 Phone (303) 866-2477 October 30, 1992 Meredith Reckert Department of Planning and Development 7500 W. 29th Ave. P.O. Box 638 __._ Wheat Ridge, CO 80034-.0638 Dear Ms. Reckert: CITY 'OF V+1Hr ,~- RlDG~ D -~-~~ ~, n IdDV 04 1992 ~i PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT This letter acknowledges receipt of information regarding the application which pertains to Case -No. WZ-92-7, located at 5000 _Robb Street. The Colorado Land Use Commission does not have any specific comments regarding same at this time. Thank you for the submittal. If you have any questions, please contact me at 866-2155. Sincerely, Cole Finegan Chief Legal Counsel pF COO F4' ~' +$ + *~ ~ v876 ~` Roy Romer Governor CF:lan Arvada Fire Protection District FIRE MARSHALS' OFFICE P. O. Box 3-D ARVADA,COLORAD080007 Telephone (303) 425-0850 - FAX (303) 422-4569 November 4, 1992 Ms. Meredith Reckert Wheat Ridge Department of Community Development 7500 W. 29th Ave P.O. Box 638 Wheat Ridge, CO. 80034 RE: Plaza 5000, 5000 Robb St. Dear Meredith, We have reviewed the site plan for this location and have the following comments. We do not object to the proposed street dedication. Sincerely, Arvada Fire Protection District S eve ~ ig eder Deputy Fire Marshal ~'TY OF WHEAT RIDGE I D _.21~D NOV 0 91992 PLANNING ~~ DEVELOPMENT ~~ November 19, 1992 Meredith M. Reckert City of Wheat Ridge Department of Community Development 7500 West 29 Avenue, P.O. Box 638 Wheat Ridge, Cdiorado 80034-0838 Planning Department 431-3020 Re: Case No. WZ-92-7, Plaza 5000 Business Center, 5000 Robb Street, Rezoning and Final Development Plan/Plat Dear Ms. Reckert, The City of Arvada has received the above referral for a rezoning and final development plan/plat to allow construction of an office/warehouse development on three platted lots. The site which is located south of Ridge Road on Robb Street is located just outside of the City of Arvada growth limits and is adjacent to the City of Arvada along the north boundary of the proposed 30 foot right of way dedication. That portion of Arvada which is adjacent to the site is zoned PUD-I for Planned •- Office/Industrial Parks. After review of the plans it appears that this development would be compatible with future development which may occur adjacent to it in the City of Arvada. The referral was distributed to the appropriate departments within the city and we have received a copy of the State Board of Land Commissioners comments. The staff has the following comments at this time: City of Arvada 8101 Ralston Road Arvada, Colorado 80002 Phone 303-421-2550 Fax 303-431-3085 Development should meet the criteria and master plan of the Columbine Basin by Urban Drainage Flood Control District (UDFCDI/City of Wheat Ridge/City of Arvada. The State Board of Land Commissioners comments are attached. We request that the concerns of the state be addressed prior to city council action on the proposed development. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this case, if you have any questions please contact Gregg Lair at 431-3020. -lY..,QF WFIEAT_RIDGE ~ p_~r~nrtt~.~~ ~. ~i~~J 2 5 1G"? Pj}1NNlNG & DEVELQ Sincerely, Mike Smith Manager of Planning and Zoning cc: Gregg Lair, Planner 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE P.O. 60X 638 WHEAT RIDGE.. CO 80034-0638 (303) 234-5900 City Admin. Fax # 234-5924 November 12, 1992 Palice Dept. Faxk235-2949 Mr. Scott Price State Board of Land Commissioners 1313 Sherman Street, Room 620 Denver CO 80203 Dear Scott: The City of Wheat Ridge Please consider this letter a follow-up to our conversation o£ this morning. Attached is a copy of the development plan and plat for property located at 5000 Robb Street. Of particular concern is the half- street dedication for West 50th Avenue as the northern half of the street would be located on state-owned land when developed. The City of Wheat Ridge has requested this half-street dedication to improve local circulation in the area and is partially basing a recommendation of approval to Planning Commission on this dedication. As I mentioned, the Planning Commission public hearing is scheduled for November 19, 1992. The City Council public hearing will most likely occur in January. Any comments you have will be included as part of the evidence presented by Staff. Attached also is a referral response from the City of Arvada. Their initial response did not indicate any concerns. They are still in the process of reviewing the revised plan with the West 50th Avenue dedication. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 235-2848. I apologize for-our initial confusion. Sincerely, C~~~1~2-zQ-~-,vG~ Meredith Reckert Planner MR:slw attachment ~~ Gi Rw redeA Pun~~~' <r NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge Planning Commission on November 19, 1992 at 7:30 p.m, at 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. The following petitions shall be heard: 1. Case No. MS-92-2: An application by Leora Nelson and Elma Eason for Leora B. Cunningham for approval of a two-lot minor subdivision with variances for property located at 4100 Quay Street. Said property is legally described as follows: THAT PORTION OF THE EAST ONE-HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER, SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORADO, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT THAT IS 30.00 FEET EAST AND 25.00 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST ONE-HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER, SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF QUAY STREET A DISTANCE OF 155._51 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 6, DAY'S SUBDIVISION; THENCE EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 134.35 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 6; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE WEST LINES OF PARCELS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 684, PAGE 452 AND BOOK 686, PAGE 356, A DISTANCE OF 155.48 FEET, MORE OR LESS TO THE NORTH LINE OF WEST 41ST AVENUE; THENCE WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF WEST 41ST A DISTANCE OF 134.40 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 0.480 ACRE, MORE OR LESS. 2. Case No. WZ-92-11: An application by the City of Wheat Ridge for approval of a rezoning from Agricultural-One (A-1) to Planned Commercial Development (PCD) and for the establishment of uses allowed and general design parameters akin to an Outline Development Plan. Said property is located at approximately 12851 West 32nd Avenue and is legally described as follows: A parcel of land situated in the northwest quarter of Section 29, T.3 S., R. 69 W. o£ the 6th P.M., County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of Lot 7, 70 West Business Center, whence the West quarter corner of said Section 29 bears S. 860 33' 43" W. a distance of 724.88 feet; 1. Thence N. 89° 43' 30" E. a distance of 29.00 feet; 2. Thence N. 79° 09' 50" E. a distance of 194.52 feet; 3. Thence N. 06° 31' 00" E. parallel with and 76.67 feet east of the east line of lots 2 and 3 of said 70 West Business Center, a distance of 559.64 feet, to a point on the extension of the north line of said lot 2; 4. Thence S. 890 39' 00" W. along the said extension of lot 2 a distance of 25.00 feet; lF " 5. Thence S. 000 21' 00" E. a distance of 25.50 feet; 6. Thence S. 890 39' 00" W. parallel with and 25.50 feet south of the said extension a distance of 55_30 feet, to a point on the east line of said lot 2; 7. Thence S. 060 31' 00" W. along the east line of said lots 2 and 3 a distance of 539.55 feet, to the southeast corner of said lot 3; 8. Thence S. 89° 43' 30" W. along the south line of said lot 3 a distance of 142.60 feet, to the southwest corner of said lot 3; 9. Thence S. 00° 47' 15" E. along the east line of said lot 7 a distance of 30.00 feet, to the point of beginning; The parcel described above contains 45,176 square feet, or 1.037 acres, more or less. 3. tease-NO.~WZ-92-7: An application by Richard Todd for P ill p G. Haas for approval of a rezoning from Agricultural-One (A- 1) to Planned Commercial Development (PCD) and for approval of a combined outline and final development plan and plat. This is a reconsideration of a Denial recommendation by Planning Commission at the October 15, 1992 public hearing. The applicant has submitted a revised development plan and plat for the property located at 5000 Robb Street, which is legally described as follows: A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE SW1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST, OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. SAID TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE N89026'26"E, 663.61 FEET AND N00017'51"W, 1090.60 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N00°17'51"W, 229.60 FEET; THENCE N89029'40"E, 664.19 FEET; THENCE 500016'19"E, 229.60 FEET; THENCE 589029'40"W, 664.09 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID TRACT CONTAINING 3.50 ACR S, MORE OR LESS. Sandra Wiggi s ecretary ATTEST: Wanda Sang, City Clerk To be Published: November 5, 1992 Wheat Ridge Sentinel <pc>pnms922/wz9211/wz927 r' ~ P,O.80X 638 TELEPHONE: 3031277.60aa The City 7500 WEST 20TH AVENUE . WFIEAT fiIOGE. COLOtiA00 80031 ~Whea ~Ridg POSTING CERTIFICATION CASE N0. V~'Z ~92-•7 PLANNING COMMISSION - CITY COUNCIL - BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (Circle One) HEARING DATE: ~~oppc~rF..,rvir,F_,Ji LG lr1GZ I ~ ~vtnRLL !~ . ( oc~y n a m e / residing at ~S~O '%tFLCrF~ ST, ( a d d r e s s) as the applicant for Case No, t~l~.Z'~iZ-~ , hereby certify that I have posted the Notice of Public Hearing at o c a t i o n• f on this ~ day of ~r/~GyyTj,If1 , 19~y~_, and do hereby certify that said sign has been posted and remained in place for fifteen (15) days prior to and including the scheduled day of public hearing of this case. The sign was posted in the position shown on the map below. Signature• r~~~ NOTE: This form must be submitted at the public hearing on this case and will be placed in the applicant's case file at the 11--.~~Lm+...L A r. ~ •. _ _ - __ __ _... _. - - ucNnl •..uQL1. V1 VUlli111 {17Il LY UCYClIl i][Re i1 ~[:. 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE P.O. BOX 638 - WHEAT RIDGE. CO 80034-0638 (303) 234-5900 City Admin. Fax # 234-5924 November 3, 1992 Police Dept. Fax # 235-2949 - The City of ~V6~heat Ridge This is to inform you that Case No. Wz-92-7 which is a _ request for approval. of a rezoning from A-1 to PCD and for approval of a combined outline-and final development plan and plat for property located at 5000 Robb Street will be heard by the Wheat Ridge Planning Commission in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex, 7500 West 29th Avenue at 7:30 p.m. , on november 19. 1992 All owners and/or their legal counsel of the parcel under consideration must be present at this hearing before the P'Iannin~ ~nmmiccinn -~ As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to notify any other persons whose presence is desired at this meeting. If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division. Thank you. PLANNING DIVISION <pc>phnoticeform fo u, y ~r.~r„ --- --- ~ ---~ r 1~ PP 923 920 457 P 923 922 462 J P 923 920 455 _.- - m a a ~ '0 lA n m m ~ W A cmi m U Cn m m m ~ ffl a m CA ffl c m c -r~ ,'S2` ,A !'i Z n v v T ~ i7 N G'i~+ Z-I m ~ z O l9 ~ Sft i'"" -I m y z O ~ A' to ~ -~ m ~ z ~ O @ ~ W Ct (p ~ ~ ~ ~ W i-' ~ » O W » ~' o ~ O m QI W~F~ O ~'~," ~~ r~ ~i p n nm o O C+4'..~T ~g €3 ~ o " ~ p Ltl ~ Ar `«i j~ Fm ° 3 °° o p ~i h"^ ~ fb S ~ ~~ o ! h U' G' ~ "€ 9 a~ 1 t1' R O ~"f o 9E ~ tb i~~ ° o - ~o m ~ ($ Yi} ~ $ m me ..; ~{'} p6 i ~ 9i °mi ".1 £'f i{ °an g <o oz m; {p ~y St n g X20 ~ ~ ° ma ~ h ~ xm g °n n C9 ~. }+• ~o m An A ~ r Q ~n r `n s~ 00 ~yl ... ~. ~ N ~ C3 4 ~ » s ft z ma ~y' zm om ~ W 0"'tf3 ga. Z °ma ~ UT !'~ r° <a m w ~ €~ ;a m w ~~- W (T ~~~~~a •~~m .J_ Wa •~~o •~~m ~ W6~~~o •~~m {t"= VJ W Dm-~ n"anfiz Dmy`eD aS1~Z Dmy`e D"aCf z ~~ ~ m ~ ~' ~. #"1 n`?'$~o ~'a93°m I n'gD'd~'6'~a ~° ~pM ~~fi~a~3~~m m m mR~-= nrya F+ff! ~'1 mS ~~a ~.. a t~ ~mm~$ .c~a ~_:3 !Y~ ~ 'Ci ~'a~g ~m'm~ WA`~C1 n-~~AS ~~~-oA w W 'J'Y1 M' - a_ ~m~ Gam=. W ~ ~, » ~ C3' ~ a~3E ~^' ~ n~3eG' ~__ c` » & if3 W Q,3cy =mm ~_ 3 ~ ~ !s N m~3 ~W_. ~ G) Fy$1' N N v'~.o u(J~ ~ S~°j v' No,O ~~~ 1 !``_ ~ m a ~p ~ B nn~ Q~o i ~ «"1 Cl ~ o ~~~' ~'no a ~ 1'e'~'~' ° °a~ gd° 3 m ~ i..Y E',' £_,~^o°m~~4eN ~ ~ ~'' ~ `'FNU~ $~a vi W ~'+~ f~° N""' Y'gOO ?J [~ K $~~' ~ o ~ Ste! N I% S;~ ~ w,S R St °~~ ~ -° -. ~ ~ ~' ~y.~ m s :r gad ~m'~ ~ ~ °~ ~, ~~~ ~ _ I)I ° ~ ~~- "`~ - as ~ v° N ~ r' p, ~ ~ Q° y as ~ ~ o w ca ° ~' o ~ ° o cs d o ° i p ~~.~ m ~ °~° ~ ;tea s !~ _p !~ ° a ° d3N ~ ~3° ~ ~u3m y ~- - 6lN 6J C 6lN FFF O O_ ~ O O ~ p ~ ~ F ~ ~ ~. ~ n' T ~ ~ ~_ 0 O n m [~ D rn D i__ y ~ In ~ ~ .~ tD ~ N ~ F - ~ ~ ~ N (7 N ~ ~ - < N _ n ~ N N ... O ' - m 'f ~ (7 ~ 3 m <o m C7 a RJ 3 N y ~ - n ~ N N ^ ^ ~ ~ ffl ~ W m coo ¢ ~o i A m W ~ "~ a N° 'O y ffl ~ W m -' m a mo ~-'- - 77 ~ (p~ ~ JJ ~ a N ¢ < £, o m a `< f. ~ o. ~7 ~ ~ a m a Z f. E "'I Q n1 l-1 11.1 ^~ A 111 m 5 TI ~ ^~ ° N N~ Q N ~ T ~ ^~ n N m S !1l 3 m m N o f1l 71J 3 m m; o ~' m flJ ~ ~° m~~ Z ~ ~ ~~ n I m ~ Ay m~ o m_ to m, m 1V' L_~m a Lti Sm ¢ mm Qr' o m oDa. m~ D [rn o m n ~m. F----- -- Q 01 ~ ~.1 ~p `G ~ .K.. s fL m ~ `N .x,. ~ m In m `~ tp ~ 3. >_ __ RI Q ~ N N m N N N N Q N N w m r._.__. ~ ~ (D N ~ N -- _T P 923 920 459 ~ P 923 92~ 45B ~ P 92:3 92^ 456 ~ (n m m m ~ ~ ~ m m m I ~ ~ m m m Cn T a n -~ ~ (A m 9 n y I (A m ~ m c < m c ~i ~j Y :xi Z ~ m n ~i OC hd Z n v z o x ~r~ ~ -Zi m~~ o a M ~ -~ m~~ o a ~° -~ m~ W r ~~ O ~ W Pi' to F^ O W ~+ O !M" O O .~ ~ ~ dti ?~ m y S O ~ dl~ m oo y ~ O Dd ~ ~ ~! ~ m oo p ~ ~ ~+, n obi ~i i++ O N ~ '.t.' d • ('] o ~ y a~ c 9 ttt ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ y'o " SLt ~ id'. o 0 o N.o i.1 ~ td +~~' ~ oN n o °o JJJJ~ hi ~ li ~ o~ ~ ~ of I SU Q t~' ~ oc n m °i d ~ d C m ~ d ii 1 i4 a m m~ ! O S. a' ~; .t ~ tZ a ~_ ~ a ~. v ~ w o ~o ~~ (~ o a 9 <m ., n° ~g r am .. o A m <m ~ ... a ~. €a \ a £9 om d+J tL as mm om a ~+~+ iII w°7 - so ma ~7f7 d T+' $9 .~ N ~ ;o "~a m cs rr. -o <~ m o ~ - <~ m ~ <° o.le. ~m w m ~ ~m ro m rsui ~ ~ ~ c ~„ ~ (T ~ :~~ ~ o ~ o ~ ~~ .. ~~ ~ n n a n m ~ ~; ~~ n rn ~_ ~ ~, n A m v m rn w~...o ...cn ~ T ~ ~ W ~ ~ a~~~_n'~~~~z ~m g a s~~-a _ 3 { 3 _~. __ _ __ -.- _- c c w v rn [n wa ...o ...y w~v a..o ...m ~ ~ dy h. ~ ~ W ~ ~ Dmy D ~o n2 DmtiSD ~~~~` Z ~ ~ ~ ~. lL '~' 3 m °: ii< i+ 1r '° `3-,-~~p'' - ~a $ !I OY ~ ~ ~A ~~ .~~~s m \ a R3 W c c •• Dial- ~m:~.. azeA> ~~ ~ v /gym. ~ try"• ~. ~ 0~ ~ m` A ~ a.3 "S,' mmm u ~~yQ' {3 d'^' am3c~ mmm 3 N id H/ C ..~ r` ~ ~ P- fJt ~* y n a~ ~ ~, w MCY !'°~ u ' nn 3 ~ v ~ M~1 ~ d l3, j~ ,~ D ~ i:: a s~.o ""u ~ da W ~ ago °'"~ ~.._ Q ~ ~a n~n m N O Q m 'c_' m i I+ s~ .rye` o n 3 B o°+ R i ~g y.w ~ o^ art g m Q ~ ~ o- v m i~V ~# H G' .~.. y K m m ~ ~ d N ~'.q'`' Q i O a°° a Cl ilt M ~ ~ ~ 2 W 4 ai ~_n m '< `,~ ~ ~ - S;1 da °°F~ 3 °Fffi '3 m Ay ~o~H ~€ °~~" ~ SIe p ~n '°' ' • • y~m m ~3m d W - V ~ ~ 3~{n ~~a 'J Q~~ v s o ga ~_ a ~^~ oa= (n "' m t 0 N C7 ~ v Q ~~ 31 JJ v A ~ m 3 c ~ ~ m ~ m ~ r O o D ~ ~ n .` '~ ~ D o Q - a Q ~ 'f7 ~I m ~ ~ m .~ Z O -J- m O ~ ~ Z o £ . ' C ~ ~ f7l ~ (~ a y = n a fLi 3 re' ^, ~ ~- t ~° n ,< N c c ^ ^~'n m ~ 0 7J y a :~ m ~' W ~ T 3i ~o y m ~ 4J a~ ~ 774 ~o ]~ a ~ C Q w ~ -fi ~ ~ ~m m l m 'PI `~ ~' n m~ s m m ¢ Z //~~p ~ ~ p ~~` D ~ p ~- ocan C) ° m `° `D ! m w~ m cn m m -i ~ f i -_ _ ~~ ~ .. ~---_ __ a ,~ f .sue.. "~~-' N N K~ - O a ~ V r I i z ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ _n r a w >_ > N m Q _ S ~ ~ ~ m ~ E ~ ~ ~ C 7 ° m fi.l m ~ fi - Q `-' > v mom ~ ~ J -o m 9 h W ~ , oya¢ . . ~ ~ m a w > ~e V n O ~ m m ._ fn ~ N o N U ~ V Xy. `~ O y, a w ~ .: O - a i ~ ~ Z 0 ` ' Q `~ v ~ Q ~ F ~ ~ .€ m r ro ~ I ~ ~ m a w LL °' w T U r v lv! > l~l f ~^~ b ~~~ k ~ b. ~~d ~ ~ m `oat ~ ' ~ ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~' ' o tz o m E.. ~. ... ~ }I 43 ~ °w 0 88 ~ a ~ea_ `o W d ~ ~ ^ +i Q C+f >~ f~ 4.l 4T ~ ~ a i N N t ~ gS$ ~ ` a R~7 a C m g~W.,oam- & ~ ~ ~ ¢ ¢ ~ E ~ m ~ ~ ~ I I 'm ~d~ a3~ v o o "¢..` ¢ ltd Q !4 m ~ m p-- yy 6O - C'3 is Ll ~~ OI m OI in Wcgc4a ~<FS~m ¢ - If_ ` O)~~• ~- a S~ ~ ~~ - aM . _~...t~=~ -- f f ~ o I ~ o ~ v UW¢ J ! 1 ¢~i 42 ' ~ r4 ~ Y l s t • l Q A o } I G \ a l l NN M ~ O i w~ w ° ~ >¢ q v ~ off" z F 'r4 ~} I zo I ~o LL ~ ¢i ffi ~+~i (~ t^~7 I oy E ~ _ ~ e 1 to ~ ~ , 4 O F ~{ ~ ~ » ~ ^~ a v Z ry ~ ~d {~i ~ U ~ W i ¢ ¢ h ~ 29h 026 E26 d h a w a w Z aC N N W T ~ ~ ~ a ~ h ~ U °' m F' fA o - ~ ~ > J W ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~~ ¢ ~~ ~ ~ QO W~Jy o Z ' W ~O = _ y{ V q V P\ t~ Q q G5 W 7¢ f,Yi C( ° V o; ~ = ` ~ ~ " o ~ j a i ~ LL ~o ~f ~ Q t~2 w o g ? L-* W c: 4t W E ~ ~ ~ N o ~s € ~ ~ Ri Af '.~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ O f t q ? ~ '! ~ i ~ d ¢ w ~ `C9fi 0 26 E26 d 1 4 6 ... o m q ... ~ F ID ~t1~ ~ 6"! °a ~1 $4 ~ L71 Q ~~ ~ d3 Q ~ t c ~ a ~ a C O LL F a w U w .. . C CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission Date Prepared: Oct. 6, 1992 Date o£ Meeting: October 15, 1992 Case Manager:~len Gidley Case No. & Name: WZ-92-7/Todd Action Requested: Approval of a rezoning from A-1 to PCD & approval of a combined outline development plan & plat Location of Request: 5000 Robb Street Name & Address of Applicant(s): Richard Todd 8600 Ralston Rd., Arvada Name & Address of Owner(s): Phillip G. Haas 8600 Ralston Rd-., Arvada Approximate Area: 3.5 acres Present Zoning: Agricultural-One Present Land Use: Single-family residence/agricultural/planned Surrounding Land Use: N E: vacant/agricultural; S~ W: single-family residence/agricultural Surrounding Zoning: N: City of Arvada; 1 S: A-1; E: C-1 Comprehensive Plan for Area: Industrial Date Published: October 1, 1992 Date to be Posted: October 1, 1992 Date Legal Notices Sent: September 30, 1992 Agency Check List ( ) Attached ( ) Not Required Related Correspondence ( ) Attached ( ) None ----------------------------------------------------------------- ENTER INTO RECORD: (XX) Comprehensive Plan (XX) Case File & Packet Materials ( ) Zoning Ordinance (XX) Slides ( ) Subdivision Regulations (XX) Exhibits JURISDICTION• The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore there is jurisdiction to hear this case. Planning Commission Staff Report Page 2 Case No. WZ-92-7/Todd I. REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a rezoning from Agricultural- One to Planned Commercial Development and for approval of a combined outline and final development plan and plat. The property is located at 5000 Robb Street and the purpose of-the rezoning is for construction of four office/warehouse buildings. There is a small, single-family residence on the front of the property which will eventually be demolished. II. DEVELOPMENT PLAN The applicant is proposing a combined outline and final development plan. The intent of the outline plan is for establishing land use allowances and general development parameters. Uses allowed within the development are C-1 and C-2 uses with outside storage. The development plan proposes four office/warehouse buildings with a total of 35,000 square feet o£ floor area. All minimum setbacks for commercial development have been met. Each building site shows a small amount of screened outside storage. Site data breakdown includes 23~ of building coverage, 45$ in paving and 29~ of landscaped coverage. Building height is limited to 50 feet. Notes have been added regarding signage, landscaping and outside lighting. Existing trees which will remain have been shown. A six-foot-high solid fence should be added along the southern property line to provide buffering for the.. residence to the south. Staff concludes that the requirements for a combined outline and final development plan have been met. III. PLAT The applicant proposes a four-iot subdivision consistent with the platting requirement for planned developments. A 30-foot right-of-way dedication occurs for Robb Street. No right- of-way is being shown for West 50th Avenue. A storm water detention .easement and cross-access/ingress-egress easement have been added to the plat face. All other requirements of the Subdivision Regulations have been met. IV. STREETS Pursuant to Case No. WPA-90-1, West 50th Avenue .was removed as a Major Regional Arterial from the Major Streets Plan. However, the minutes Planning Commission Staff Report Page 3 Case No. WZ-92-7/Todd from the April 23, 1990 City Council meeting indicated that the connection of local streets occur instead, including West 50th Avenue_ between Oak and Robb Streets. See Exhibit 'A'. Staff has requested a thirty-foot right-of-way dedication for West 50th Avenue along the northern property line. The development plan and plat do not reflect this dedication. In 1986, when the Craig Chevrolet development was approved, a forty- foot right-of-way dedication occurred for West 50th Avenue. This street was never built but abuts the subject property at the northeastern corner. Construction of the street on the subject property and adjacent property to the east would provide this link between Parfet and Robb Streets. Staff concludes that it is clear that Planning Commission and City Council intended to improve east-west traffic circulation opportunities in this area. It is also clear that intention was established for West 50th Avenue by the requirement of a dedication upon the Craig Chevrolet Subdivision immediately to the east. We therefore recommend that the development and plat be revised to show a thirty-foot dedication for West 50th Avenue along the northern property line. Please refer to Exhibit 'B'. V. AGENCY RE ERRALS All agencies can serve the property with certain improvements. Valley Water District will require extension of a 16-inch water main from Robb Street Park. Anew eight-inch water main is required on site. Arvada Fire District will require three hydrants. Colorado Division of Wildlife requests that existing mature trees remain on-site and that the detention area at the southeast corner be kept in a natural state. City of Arvada indicates that the proposal will be consistent with the land to the north which is zoned PUD-I (Planned Office/Industrial Parks). They did not comment regarding West 50th Avenue except that Ridge Road is classified as a collector to the north. Public Works is reviewing a drainage report and street construction plans for Robb Street. They are requesting a collector half-street dedication for West 50th Avenue. VI. A meeting for neighborhood input was held on July 23, 1992. Enclosed under Exhibit 'C' is a synopsis of that meeting. Planning Commission Staff Report Page 4 Case No. WZ-92-7/Todd VII. CRITERIP~ Staff-has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a rezoning request. 1. That the change of zone is in conformance, or will bring the property into conformance with the City of Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan goals, objectives and policies, Comprehensive --- Land Use plan and other related policies or plans for the area. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Industrial. Staff concludes that the proposed rezoning, uses allowed and development of the site would be compatible with this category. The Major Streets Plan amended per Case No. WPA-90-1 designates the West 50th Avenue corridor as a collector between Kipling Street and Ward Road. Staff concludes that because no dedication is shown for West 50th Avenue, the plan is contrary to the Major Streets Plan of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. That the proposed change of zone is compatible with the surrounding area and there will be minimal adverse impacts considering the benefits to be derived. Although there is adjacent residential development to the south, the applicant is trying to mitigate impact by placing buildings on the northern portion of the property. An effort should be made to keep existing trees. A six-foot solid fence should be built along the southerly lot line. 3. That there will be social, recreational, physical and/or economic benefits to the community derived by the change of zone. There could be economic benefits derived from the rezoning. 4. That adequate infrastructure/facilities are available to serve the type of uses allowed by the change of zone, or that the applicant will upgrade and provide such where they do not exist or are under capacity. The owner will be responsible for extending utility main-lines to service the development. 5. That the proposed rezoning will not adversely affect public health, safety or welfare by creating excessive traffic congestion, create drainage problems, or seriously reduce light and air to adjacent properties. The project should not adversely affect public health, safety and welfare. Planning Commission Staff Report Case No. WZ-92-7/Todd Page 5 6. That the property cannot reasonably be developed under the existing zoning conditions. The front of the property is currently being used as a single-family dwelling. 7. That the rezoning will not create an isolated or spot zone district unrelated to adjacent or nearby areas. Approval of the development will not constitute spot zoning. 8. That there is a void in an area or community need that the change of zone will fill by providing for necessary services, products or facilities especially appropriate at the location, considering available alternatives. Approval of the project will attract new business to the City of Wheat Ridge. Staff concludes that the criteria used. to evaluate a rezoning generally support approval of this request, except that no dedication occurs for West 50th Avenue. Staff recommends the development plan be amended to show this dedication. VIII. CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS Staff concludes that all requirements of the Subdivision Regulations have been met and that the submittal meets the requirements for a combined outline and final development plan. Although Staff concludes that rezoning to Planned Commercial Development is generally consistent with the Industrial designation on the Comprehensive Plan, no dedication is shown for West 50th Avenue and therefore, the proposal is contrary to the Major Streets Plan. Based upon noncompliance with the Major Streets Plan, Staff is obligated to recommend DENIAL. Should Planning Commission, however recommend approval, we would suggest the following stipulations: 1. A six-foot-high solid fence be shown along the southern property line; and 2. Staff initiate an amendment to the Major Streets. Plan to eliminate West 50th Avenue; and 3. Staff initiate a vacation of existing right-of-way dedicated for West 50th Avenue by the Craig Chevrolet Subdivision. IX. RECOMMENDED MOTIONS OPTION A: "I move that Case No. WZ-92-7, a request for rezoning £rom A-1 to PCD and for approval of a combined outline and final plan and Planning Commission Staff Report Page 6 Case No. WZ-92-7/Todd plat for property located at 5000 Robb Street, be Denied for the following reasons: 1. Without a dedication for West 50th Avenue, it is contrary to the Major Streets Plan; and 2. Staff recommends Denial." OPTION B: "I move that-Case No. WZ-92-7, a request for rezoning from A-1 to PCD and for approval of a combined outline and final plan and plat for property located at-5000 Robb Street,- be Approved for the following reasons: 1. All requirements of the Subdivision Regulations have been met; 2. The submittal meets the requirements for a combined outline and final plan and plat; 3. The rezoning to Planned Commercial Development is generally compatible with the Industrial designation on the Comprehensive Plan. With the following conditions: 1. A six-foot-high solid fence be shown along the southernn property line; and 2. Staff initiate an amendment to the Major Streets Plan to eliminate West 50th Avenue;. and 3. Staff initiate a vacation of existing right-of-way dedicated for West 50th Avenue by the Craig Chevrolet Subdivision." <pc>srwz927 1: CITY OF A~AVADA 'ITCH ~ 1 W D~j% BB STREET"PARK CRAIG ~PCD o wz-s2-2 o WZ-8 r ~CCH/AR LL/ N DUSTR/~4 PgRK _~ m ~, s AT R/D.GE ~ wz-7z-is z H' 50TH 4VE -101 W. I-70 FRONTAGE ROAD !" - / ~- 70 C _ . /~N1 ERStPt ~-- _ _ _ _. ~. ~I_- ~- ~- - ~ ,~~ ~' N S E W _Y BOONDED 8Y THE FOLLOWING STREETS: 52nd AVE. EXT. I-70 OAK ST EXT. SIMMS ST EXT. :ASE NO. INDICATES A CONDITION OR STIPULATION. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, OR INDUSTRIAL'REZONING. l9/Z-90 2 A-I 2~0 SuB,JCc.~C 5rr~ 1 ~ ~~ _~.. 50TU AVE• a ._ ;n APPROVED COMP PLAN AMENDMENT MAJOR STREETS PLAN CASE NO. WZ-92-7 EXHIBIT 'A' CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL 4-23-90 cA~~ nso. ~~ ~q2-~. pE V . PLAN A-1 ZONE 67ESIDENTIA!] ^ . ~ ;~ ~. .~qy .t,f,~r •~-., ~.:y It. ~;: ~r Pit}i _. 1 !~ s ~ : ~ : .'~ ~• ~ ,y ,- ~i~ ._ a [~ [~ : D. ` ~ z ~ .~ ~ ~ _z w n ~. y ' \ ~ o tb. . , .. - .. :. r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~° ~ o~ ~~' ~- t ~~__• dfet geese:;= - E [ a ~ o H .sy~ FTe :~zla 'c. E=E-F , FjsEEi,.`~ e ! fI m, ,. - ~ F F`~• .iEee= (gEE~T~ . F ~:ec3~ ~ :r t ,`' pa .~~ Fic`T $`•F~i}'~ ~ :FF=~}}~E~~' _. ~ `~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~.E~~D7~Big ~E~a~~ . 'E°! is Es ~p9r~•.fc. EE;4[}e4~i D ! g"`~ ~4!R t6''6a~E ` . .i ~ 5 c i; ~FIiE#~i. ~ ', sici e~ ~0 It"-.'' a T i. F i= ~ S=j~i:FIF 4 .; ~fis FE ,. sEs 9 F• a X f .. ~ B. a_..: ...~, C-1 ZONE NAOMIT),. a s~ . ••s. . ~ ' ~~t. ~ r.:... ....... s.a .. cr"'I~ -~'r. f~ •~ L' a ~. ?~ ~I~~~F+". ~ ^a R ,~~ 3: $ ~ ~$ E 6 ~ T' E E ~. F ~ i~ ~~ ~ a 'F0 €5 g f ff f ` 3~ ~ ' ~ - S, # ~f ~'I F F t € FBI . I~;I"gI T~ Q ~ s~[s ~ -. ( L. pp gg pp ` s _~ i •~,,, :"c . c .: ... c__ Es3Ea =Fc v 3:$5Eg'' p r s.G;'iJ: {e-`~. ,, j , _I.+` Fi 1c~iEjF °E. A-t UNPLATTm r y. . . 0 fi~ - ~ 3?fi2i2fi " ~5= ~ a rs 3; rs g a a:9 ~a.; rs-- ~ 8 . € t Es9'~a5 ~ . ~~ y} ~ .~ ~g=~?i 5 E 2 i ~~. . gg a , ~As' ~~ .~ ~ ..; . y ~:i @: ~"a9rs 5. x3 5~~ s ~ ~ ~ i~ { a i- rs3 a ~, ,=9 .fi i ~ ~I ~~ fi~ ~ .3 ~ :: fi g" 3~!~q Cril ~~.~r~ s ~ ~_ G firsF `: 8 Y t... ---~i ~i-.-.r -.f.Ixi...Ye•..: .. .. •t~ a . !, ~R::' .; ~:. E,~. ~.. ~.• ,i . -s'• ~ .~\ ~ ,. if Q~ -~ ' C a noes smear l~ 0~ t ~ I 13~A0 I ~ I wy r - i ~ I I I I ~ _ ~ r , tl~ - ~, I asewo• 1 6 i q ~ ~ ~ ~ g y, I i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ tN e I ~ r f I~~ ~ L ___-~ ~ ~ i I ~ ~ ~ I ~ v ~ >, I I € ~ I i ~ ~ ~ i ~ ii Z ~; !! ~ ~' F" I ~ . - - I 4 ~ 1 ~ i it I ~ 1 ~ ...;. .. I \ r _ - - _ ~ I ~.. t c ~ . ~~ ~~. i ~ ~ ~ ; { i I . . ~ s ~ ' - ~C1nR_s a.s!' g Ys F, f~S~EQfi 1~¢ a~4~~ ~ 3 22@j~pe7:8 {@_ ~~~a863g~~.T ~. c~ ~~~a~58~ ~~~~~g.. i$ r $~~i~i~. ~~~~~aig= ~ . ,~3~~~a~p ~~ , IY~~e ;; ~~~~~ . I~ 9~p`f~ ~E ~~- `~' . C-J , MEDVE01 CHEVROLET .:t,~~ .., ~ ~ . i®® a'el fi'~'~' ~ cn ~ ~fiy : 1 ~ ~ ~' fi@~ ~ i:~~. ., .~~ H ~ ~ i ~ ~ i E: pa ~ ~: i E $'i8~ 8 i ., ~8 B ~ .. . Q fi ! 84 $~ iE ~~ ~ ' a I~iE - ~ ~ `a 3 g ~p S :: n+ •+"~' ~ a " ~ ~ ~ ass s ~ ~ ' fi i ~ i~•' E. ~ -=1 ` ~ i~ ~C E ~ ~ i.~ i ~e3 = ~ 2'3B ~ ~ a e3 y9 : ~ ~' fig ~ . : ` - s >I ~ ' ~ : :I $ ~ ~ 'Z .. ; :Tee . .. =; ~ q ~ i e ' ' l y a n •a $ - g a ~_ 3 E3c,H+Bt7 gyp' CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT T0: Planning Commission Date Prepared' ov. 12, 1992 Date of Meeting: November 19, 1992 Case Manager:' len Gidley Case No. & Name: WZ-92-7/Todd Action Requested: Approval of a rezoning from A-1 to PCD & approval of a combined outline development plan & plat Location of Request: 5000 Robb Street Name & Address of Applicant(s): Richard Todd 8600 Ralston Rd., Arvada Name & Address of Owner(s): Phillip G. Haas 8600 Ralston Rd., Arvada ----------------------------------------------------------------- Approximate Area: 3.5 acres Present Zoning: Agricultural-One Present Land Use: Single-family residence/agricultural/planned Surrounding Zoning: N: City of Arvada; ~, S: A-1: E: C-1 Surrounding Land Use: N, E: vacant/agricultural; S, W: single-family residence/agricultural Comprehensive Plan for Area: Industrial ----------------------------------------------------------------- Date Published: November 5, 1992 Date to be Posted: November 5, 1992. Date Legal Notices Sent: November 5, 1992 Agency Check List (XX) Attached ( ) Not Required Related Correspondence (XX) Attached ( ) None ---------- - ----------------------------------------------------- ENTER INTO RECORD: (XX) Comprehensive Plan (BX)-Case File & Packet Materials ( ) Zoning Ordinance (XX) Slides (XX) Subdivision Regulations (XX) Exhibits JURISDICTION' The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore there is jurisdiction to hear this case. Planning Commission Staff Report Case No. WZ-92-7/Todd I. REQUEST Page 2 The applicant is requesting approval of a rezoning from Agricultural- One to Planned Commercial Development and for approval of a combined outline and fina`1 development plan and plat. The property is located at 5000 Robb Street and the purpose of the rezoning is for construction of three office/warehouse buildings. There is a small, single-family residence on the front of the property which will be demolished. II. CASE HISTORY At their October 18 public hearing, Planning Commission .reviewed a request for this property showing four office/warehouse buildings. A recommendation of Denial was given for the following reasons: 1. The property is located within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore there is jurisdiction to hear this case; 2. Without a dedication for West 50th Avenue, it is contrary to the Mayor Streets Plan; 3. Until such time as an alternate street plan is in place, Commission does not feel comfortable. in recommending approval; and 4. Staff recommends Denial. III. DEVELOPMENT PLAN The applicant is proposing a revised combined outline and final development plan. The intent of the outline plan is for establishing land use allowances and general development parameters. Uses allowed within the development are C-1 and C-2 uses with outside storage. The development plan proposes three office/warehouse buildings with a total of 34,000 square feet of floor area. All minimum setbacks for commercial development have been met. Buildings 2 and 3 show a small amount of screened outside storage.- The buildings have been re- oriented to the north with a secondary access to West 50th Avenue. Site date breakdown includes 22% of building coverage, 31o in paving and 25~ of landscaped coverage. Building height is limited to 50_ feet. -Notes have been added regarding signage, landscaping and outside lighting. Existing trees which will remain have been shown. A six-foot-high solid fence should be added along the entire length of the southern property line to provide buffering for_the residence to the south. Staff concludes that the requirements for a combined outline and final development plan have been met. Planning Commission Staff Report Case No. WZ-92-7/Todd IV. PLAT Page 3 The applicant proposes a three-lot subdivision consistent with the platting requirement for planned developments. A 30-foot right-of-way dedication occurs for Robb Street. A 30-foot right-of-way dedication is being shown for West 50th Avenue. A storm water detention easement and cross-access/ingress-egress easement have been added to the plat face. V. STREETS Pursuant to Case No. WPA-90-1, West 50th Avenue was removed as a Major Regional Arterial from the Major Streets Plan. However, the minutes from the April 23, 1990 City Council meeting indicated that the connection of local streets occur instead, including West 50th Avenue between Oak and Robb Streets. See Exhibit 'A'. Staff has requested a 30-foot right-of-way dedication for West 50th Avenue along the northern property line. The development plan and plat have been amended to reflect this dedication. In 1986, when the Craig Chevrolet development was approved, a 40-foot right-of-way dedication occurred for West 50th Avenue. This street was never built but abuts the subject property at the northeastern corner. Construction of the street on the subject property and adjacent property to the east would provide this link between Parfet and Robb Streets. Staff concludes that it is clear that Planning Commission and City Council intended to improve east-west traffic circulation opportunities in this area. It is also clear that intention was established for West 50th Avenue by the requirement of a dedication upon the Craig Chevrolet Subdivision immediately to the east. Staff concludes that the amended plan and plat are consistent with the Major Streets Plan. IV. AGENCY REFERRALS The revised submittal was re-referred to affected outside agencies. All agencies can serve the property with certain improvements. Valley Water District will require extension of a 16-inch water main from Robb Street Park. New eight-inch and 12-inch water mains are required on site. Arvada Fire District will require three hydrants. They have no objection to the revised plan. City of Arvada indicates that the proposal will be consistent with the land to the. north which is zoned PUD-I (Planned Office/Industrial Planning Commission Staff Report Page 4 Case No. WZ-92-7/Todd Parks). They have no objection regarding West 50th Avenue dedication: Public Works is reviewing a drainage report and street construction plans for Robb Street and West 50th Avenue. VII. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING A meeting for neighborhood input was held on July 23, 1992. Enclosed under Exhibit 'G' is a synopsis of that meeting. VIIY. CRITERIA 1. That the change of zone is in conformance, or will bring the property into conformance with the City of Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan goals, objectives and policies, Comprehensive Land Use plan and other related policies or plans for the area. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Industrial. Staff concludes that the proposed rezoning, uses allowed and development of the site would be compatible with this category. The Major Streets Plan amended per Case No. WPA-90-1 designates the West 50th Avenue corridor as- a collector between Kipling Street and Ward Road. Staff concludes that because a dedication is shown for West 50th Avenue, the plan is consistent with the Major Streets Plan of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. That the proposed change of zone is compatible with the surrounding area and there will be minimal adverse impacts considering the benefits to be derived. Although there is adjacent residential development to the south, the applicant is trying to mitigate impact by placing buildings on the northern portion of the property as much as possible. An effort should be made to keep existing trees. A six-foot solid fence should be built along the southern lot line. 3. That there will be social, recreational, physical and/or . economic benefits to the community derived by the change of zone. There could be economic benefits derived from the rezoning. 4. That adequate infrastructure/facilities are available to serve the type of uses allowed by the change of zone, or that the applicant will upgrade and provide such where they do not exist or are under capacity. The owner will be responsible for extending utility main lines to service the development. 5. That the proposed rezoning will not adversely affect public health, safety or welfare by creating excessive traffic , congestion, create drainage problems, or seriously reduce light and air to. adjacent properties. Planning Commission Staff Report Case No. WZ-92-7/Todd Page 5 The project should not adversely affect public health, safety and welfare. 6. That the property cannot reasonably be developed under the existing zoning conditions. The front of the property is currently being used as a single-family dwelling. 7. That the rezoning will not create an isolated or spot zone district unrelated to adjacent or nearby areas. Approval of the development will not constitute spot zoning. 8. That there is a void in an area or community need that the change of zone will fill by providing for necessary services, products or facilities especially appropriate at the location, considering available alternatives. Approval of the project will attract new business to the City of Wheat Ridge. Staff Concludes that the criteria used to evaluate a rezoning generally support approval of this request, and, therefore recommends approval of the development plan. IX. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Staff concludes that all requirements of the Subdivision Regulations have been met.and that the submittal meets the requirements for a combined outline and final development plan. Staff concludes that rezoning to Planned Commercial Development 3s generally consistent with the Industrial designation on the Comprehensive Plan, and with a dedication shown for West 50th Avenue the proposal is consistent with the Major Streets Plan. For these reasons a recommendation of Approval is given for Case No. WZ-92-7 with the condition that a six-foot-high solid fence be shown along the entire length of the southern property line and that the entry design (i.e., brick veneer or other material)'be carried out on all sides of the buildings with street exposure. RECOMMENDED MOTION OPTION A: "I move that Case No. WZ-92-7, a request for rezoning from A-1 to PCD and for approval of a combined outline and final plan and plat for property located at 5000 Robb Street, be Approved for the following reasons: 1. All requirements of the Subdivision Regulations have been met; 2. The submittal meets the requirements for a combined outline and final plan and plat; and Planning Commission Staff Report Page 6 Case No. WZ-92-7/Todd 3. The rezoning to Planned Commercial Development is generally compatible with the Industrial designation on the Comprehensive Plan. With the following condition: 1. A six-foot-high solid fence be shown along the southern property line. 2. The entry-design (i.e., brick veneer or other material) be carried out on all sides of the buildings with public street exposure." <pc>srwz927 CASE NO. 4VZ-92-7 X Fire: AGENCY REFERRALS SUMMARY Will require three hydrants. Schools: X Water: (Valley) Will require line extensions. (F 'tdale) No response. X Sewer. rui ~ X US West Communications: ~o response X Public Service Co; No problems X State Land Use Comm. (over 5 acres): No problems. State Geologist: - State Highway: Jefferson County:(HEALTH, COMMISSIONERS, PLANNING) ^ X Adjacent City: (Arvada) No problems American Cablevison: ,_ X State wand Board:.. Still reviewing. CITY DEPARTMENTS X Public Works: Reviewing drainage report and street construction plans. Parks & Recreation: Police: Building Inspection: - - pc/Agencyrefsum CITY O ~ ~ I TCH ADA ;. 0~~ 88 STREF~T"PARK ~PCD wz-s2-2 ~r ECCH/AR LL/ r ~DUSTR/,4 PARK AT R/D.GE ~ !yZ-90 2 ~ ~ wz-72-i9 i_ i. H- z', W w Q W W Z J Z O ut N f N 6 t I ~ W 50TH 4VE CRAIG ICHE' a Iwz- 8 s- Ic V WPpSY m ~ °~~ ~, d •W. I-70 FRONTAGE ROAD N 1 ~ ~ ~NSERStpSE -. ... -'-- --rt--- -.. //~i~ -_ _-_. _ - --- -- j //., it N S E W v BOUNDED BY THE FOLLOWING STREETS: 52nd AVE. EXT. 5-70 OAK ST. EXT. SIMMS 57 EX7. _ __ __. _... ._. _.. _. ...uc.. ntm rtm ne~lCNT (1G IL111tICTAi DI 'oF>t1NING. _ ~, S~~ECt S~rE 50rw AVt~ CASE NO. WZ-92-7 EXHBTT 'A' `~ 1 1 2~0~~ .. ~i ....-. ...// w ~, al -~ n , APPROVED COMP PLAN AMENDMENT MAJOR STREETS PLAN CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL 4-23-90 N U1B'S,- w 18., 5.' CASE NO. WZ-92-7~ '~-- -- -- ~ T EET R-O-W MAP Y: 1 i ~ I1,1 .g Y~ ~ X t Y ' ~ ^~ `1` ~ ~a Xg i MO ~ %- 8y I O ` ~I -> ° i q `~' ~,. ~~ i __ AID ~, _._-_ ROBE Si° .•..L.-T""~ .l. {_. ..._'_- ~ '~ m ' 1 ~:.I~ PI C ~ _~I R Y _~ ~ 9 , '~1 I N a ~ s 1. T_ _ ,~ --~-----_-__-__-- l ~ ~,.. i a. ~ + CA ~ ~ gQ~ + u I ~ ~ b. s Z ~ ~1 > a - it C .,.,.... ~ ~ n ~a ~, v ~ 3 -~ a ~`g ~; ;, ~ f1 ~ CG ;.~,.o _ • p 3 I: cn CSt9 ~ ~g p ii; Z C _ a ~ pb~~ i ~ .~ - - - - - ---- --i- _ i _ _ - - P ARF E i ST ~ - ~ - - - - - - - ~ T- I .- ~ - 1 N 012'58- W 1636.68' '~ _---_-'--_-- . 1 .. -. _____ ._.._ __.. R Y.r x itt L aj .. :.r^~~+. ~;vr-e.r:n 5 - n.o- e , ' - m' a r.., r^~ .. £ ~ T x D ~~ • Y ~ _ N ~ - ^1.611^, ~~ _ 1 • ~ • CASE. NQ. WZ-92-7 ~ / EXHIBIT 'C' R ~J V V ENGINEERING ~ SURVEYING, INC. ENGINEERING SURVEYING CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AUGUST 21, 1992 MEMORANDUM: NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING TO: _MS_ MERIDETH RECKERT CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, PLAN G DEPARTMENT FROM: J. CLIFFORD MCKISSACK ~ R&W ENGINEERING AND SURVE G, INC_ SUBJECT: REZONING OF PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 4976 AND 5000 ROBB STREET FROM A-1 TO PID. DATE: JULY 23, 1992 TIME: 7:00 P.M. LOCATION: 8600 RALSTON ROAD - RE/MAX WEST OFFICE BUILDING NEIGHBORS ATTENDING: SEE ATTACHED SHEET The neighborhood meeting was held to inform the residents of the intent of the developer to rezone the subject property from its existing A-1 zone to PID. The intent of the rezoning is to allow the construction of four (4) warehouse buildings (with small office spaces) which range in size from 3,000 square feet to 12,000 square feet. (See attached exhibits). We informed the neighbors present of the process the City requires a property to follow when requesting a zone change and that the neighborhood meeting is the first step in that process. We informed the neighbors that they also have the opportunity to express their concerns, if any, at the planning Commission public hearing, and also at the City Council public hearing. There was an introduction of the proposed project. A proposed site plan exhibit and architectural rendering elevations were presented to show the neighbors what the buildings would most likely look like. There was a general discussion indicating the pros and cons of the project. The following is a listing of the concerns that were brought out during the meeting: 1_ In general , the project was received tentatively by the neighbors_ They realize this area will be developed as we are proposing, but at the same time are concerned about the impacts to their neighborhood. 5151 WARD ROAD, UNIT 3 ~ WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80033 (303)423-3300 x~ FAX (303)420-4391 N ~ 2. The acknowledged the landscaping planned and were favorable with the amount of landscaping shown, but were concerned with continued maintenance. We informed them that a Owners Association will be formed to taker of items such as these. 3. They were concerned with the fact that Valley Water District will need to extend a 16-inch water main to the project site from the south. We assured them that a traffic plan will need to be approved by the City that will insure ample access to the neighborhood_ 4. Concerns about exterior upkeep of the structures. We informed them that the units would be individually owned, but an overall Covenant Control would be placed on the property that will address these types of concerns_ 5. Mr. Hawn was concerned about the possible contamination or affect a£ the development to his water well. We informed him that all precautions would be taken during the construction of the site against any such contamination. These were the major items of concern. I have included the sign up sheet and my hand written notes for your records. I have also included a copy of the Notice of Neighborhood Input Meeting form that was mailed out. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please give me a call. The drainage report will be forwarded to Engineering as soon as it is completed. Sincerely- , J. C ford McKissack R&W ngineering and Surveying, Inc. cc: Mr. Richard Todd N y . DELIVERY RECEIPT COLORADO NATIONAL TITLE, INC. 717 Seventeenth Street, Suite 1650 Denver, Coloz'ade 80202 (303) 295-7300 FAX # (303) 295291$ 4r*+t****YY tk Syr yr~Yr4~wye i<:Y RSr 9r*k*W~ir*~Fw,t*Ri~Ak**Vr it*~t ~v:f*9r 9r tk***a*Vr******,k* ORIGINAL TO: RICHARD TODD COPY T0: COLORADO NATIONAL TITLE, INC. 850Q RALSTON ROAD ARVADA, CO 80002 9t 9c*****lt it*ir***i1"k'k*+k DATE: SELLER' PURCHASER: PROPERTY ADDRESS: &49r,t 1C Yr 9r 4r*****k*k~F#ekk,t*4r uc it ~Y it ~4 ~Y :F ~kA**1f*~+t4$k~k 44r*~h OUR FILE NO. 134$4 ___ HAAS/BRADLEY YOUR FILE NO.~_ TODD _ 4976-5444 ROBS STREET- WE ARE PLEASED TO ENCLOSE THE FOLLOWING: __ Title Insurance Commitment Endorsement -Tax Certificate Restrictive Covenants Lien Indemnity Latter Survey .-- - Foreclosure Guarantee Invoa.ce Other' Other: --- PLEASE ACXNOWLEDGE YOUR RECEIPT OF THE ABOVE BY SIGNING THIS TRANSMITTAL FORM IN 'SHE SPACE PROVIDED BELOW AND RETURN M ~ PURPORTED .7aDDRE3S: 4976-5000 ROBH STREET SCHEDULE A File Numbez: 13484 1. Effective Hate: AUGUST 19, 7.992 AT 8:00 A.M. 2. Police or policies to be issued: Amount Premium (A) ALTA Owner 's Policy-Proposed Xnsured: 026.00 $250 000.00 $_,,7 RICHARD R. TODD (B} ALTA Laan Policy-Proposed Insured: THD Certificate of Taxes Due Forme 8.1 and 100 Additional Charges (if any} TOTAL $TBD $ 75.09 $ 30.00 $_ $ - $ 31. 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this commitment and covered hezein is fee simple and title thezeto is at the effective date hereof vested in: PHILLIP G. HAAS, THOMAS M. 73RADLEX AND JERRY A. HANSON q. The land referred to in this commitment is described ag follows: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACKED HERETO Issued At DENVER COLORADO by: COLORADO NATIONAL TITLE, INC. 717 - 17th Street, Suite 1fi50 Denver, Colorado 80202 (303) 295-7300 N FILE No. 13404 Exxz$IT "A" THE SOUTH I I/2 ACRES OF THE NORTH 3 i/2 ACRES OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE 5OUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, 'SO STATEP OF COLORADOGAESCRIBED AS THE 6TH P.M.r COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, ALONG THE SOUTHELINETOFJSATDOSECTION 16IA AISTANCEIOF 663N36 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EASfi HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTTON 16; THENGE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 16, A DTSTANCE OF 1,490.61 FEET, MORE OR LESS; TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTH 3 1/2 ACRES OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF Tf#E SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST BEGINNINGF THENCEE EAST p6ARALLEL PWITH THEN NORTH TLINEP OFTTHE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF ^s HE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 16, ALONG THE 50UTH LINE OF SAIA NORTH 3 1/2 ACRES A DISTANCE OF 662.402 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 5ECTION 016 ~HTHENCEHNORTHQALONG OTHETEASTOULZNESOF THEENORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SEGTTON 16 A bISTANCE OF 98.67 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH 1 1/2 ACRES OF THE NORTH 3 112 ACRES OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION I6; THENCE WEST PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QECTION 016 AHAISTANCEEOF 62.316 FEET TO THE WEST LQINE OF THE EAST HALF Ok" THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID OFCBEGINNING H EXCEPT THE WESTT 4CFEET I,XTNG WTTHTN ROB$ STRE$TTNT COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. AND SOUTHWEST %4,C SECTOONTI6, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH,SRANGEE69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, . STATE OF COLORADO. M FILE NO. 13484 SCHEDULE 8 - SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS The Following are the requirements to be complied with: Item Ea) ull considezation fore thecestate£oz interest to be mortgagors of insured. Item (b) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and/or duly Filed for record to wit: 1, WARRANTY DEED FROM PHILLSP G. HAAS, THOMAS M. BRADLEY AND JERRY A. HANSDN TO RZCHARD R. TODD SUFFICIENT TO CONVEY THE FEE SIMPLE ESTATE OR INTEREST TN THE LAND DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO HEREIN. NOTE: SECTION 38-35-7.09(2) OF THE COLORADO REVISED STATUTES, 1973 REQUZRE5 THAT A NOTATION OF THE PURCHASER'S LEGAL ADDRESS BE INCLUDED ON TflE FaCE OF THE DEED TO BE RECORDED. SECTION 39-14-102(1)( ) COLORADO REVISED STATUTES, 1973 REQUIRES ALL CONVEYANCE AOCUAIENTS SUBJECT TO THE DOCUMENTARY FEE SUBMITTED TO THE CLERK AND RECORDER FOR RECORDING BE ACCOMPANIER BY A REAL PROPERTY TRANSFER DECLARATTON_SIGNEA BY THE GRANTOR OR GRANTEE. EVIDENCE MU5T BE FURNISHED TO THE COMPANY BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF T8E HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION AS TO THE STATUS OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED PURSUANT TO THE COVENANTS, IF ANY. 2. DEED OF TRUST SUFFICIENT TO MORTGAGE THE FEE SIMPLE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LRND DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO HEREIN, TO TKE PROPOSED INSURED, SCHEDULE A, STEM B. NOTE: IF THE DELETION DF STANDARD EXCEPTIONS 2 AND 3 IS REQUIRED ON THE LOAN POLICY, THE COMPANX WILL REQUIRE A BOUNDARY SURVEY TD BE PROVIDED WHICH WILL INCLUDE AN ACCURATE DESCRIPTION OE' SUBJECT PROPERTX. (CONTINUED) ~J FILE NO. 13484 PAGE 2 SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1 RE OONTNUED) 3, RELEASE OF DEED OF TRUST k•ROM THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF J00 DATED THE DEED OF TRUST FROM PHILLIP G. .HAAS FOR THE USE COUNTY OF F.A. TO SECURE 1986~AT •REC. NO• OF HOME SAVINGS OF AMERICA, AUGUST 13, 1986 AND RECORDED AUGUST 15, 86094742 AND ANY AND ALL ASSIGNMENT5 THEREOF- HAAS FOR THE 1986 4, RELEASEOF THE DEED TOFU TRUST FROM PHBLLIpTGUSTEE OF 3EFfERSO COUNTY LEMON TO SECURE $ 8,500.00 DATED AUGUST 13r OF JOSIE E• 1886 AT REC• NO. 86094743 AND ANY AND AND RECORDED AUGUST 15, pi1,L ASSIGNMENTS 'T'HEREOF. c,, RELEASE OFTHE~DEED OF TRiJST FROM THOMAS M T BRADLEX FOR THE USE COUNTY OF RICA, F.A. TO SECURE 1986~AT •REC DANOD OF HOME 5AVSNGS OF AME AUGUST 10, 1986 AND RECORDED AUGUST 19, 86095333 AND ANY AND ALL ASSIGNMENTS THEREOF. CERTIFICATE OF SATISFACTION ISSUED BY THE CLERK OF COURT O b, 1990 AND ENTERED IN FAVOR OF FIRST JUDGMENT DATED OCTOBER 5, AAS IN THE AMOUNT NATIONAL BANK OF ARVADA AGAINST PHISAID JUD MENT HAVING BEEN OF $ 46,143.81 PLUS COURT COSTS, ENTERED UNDER CIVIL ACTION N0. 900037b3 IN THE D TN THE COUNTY FOR THE COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, A TRANSCRIPT OF WHICH WAS IN AND RECORDED FEBRUARY 3, 1992 AT REC. N0. 920111 OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. 7, PAYMENT OF ALL TAXES AND ASSES$M~ TAXE5 DUE HAS BEEIXORDERED, NOTE: TREASURER'S CERTIFICATE O BUT NOT YET RECEIVED BY TAE COMPANY- DISCL05URE PURSUSECTIONCOOO11p0122EVISED STATUTES THE SUBJECT REAL PROPERTX MAX BE LOCATED IN A SPECIAL TAXING DI5TRICT~ (CONTINUED) ~~ FILE NO. 13484 PAGE 3 SCHEDULE & - SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS (CONTINUED) A CERTIFICATE OF FAXES AUE LISTING EACH TAXING JURISDICTION SHALL HE OBTAINED FROM THE COUNTY TREASURER OR THE COUNTY TREASURER'S AUTHORIZED AGENT, INFORMATION REGARDING SPECIAL DISTRICTS AND THE BOUNDARIES OF SUCH DISTRICTS MAX BE OBTAINED FROM THE &OARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, THE COUNTY CLERK AI]D RECORDER OR THE COUNTY ASSESSOR. •~ FILE NQ. 13484 SCHES~ULE B - SECTYON 2 EXCEPTIONS The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in gossesgion not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, ' encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or materiel hereto or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Unpatented mining claims, zeaezvations or exceptions in patents or in acts authorizing the issuance thereof. 6. Water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not shown by the public records. 7. Taxes or assessments which are not Shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies texas or assessments on real property or by the public records. 8. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 9. ANY AND ALL UNPAID TAXES, ASSESSMENTS AND UNREDEEMED TAX SALES. (CONTTNUEAj t: ;.~ 08i20i92 IE~~4 FI1,E N0. 13484 PAGE 2 ~. y 2952918 NRTIONRL TITLE SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2 EY.CEPTIONS (CONTTNUEA) 10. ANY PORTION OF SUB~7ECT PROPERTY LYING WITHIN ROBB STREET BS SHOWN ON THE JEFFERSON COUNTY ASSESSOR`S MAP. 11. EXISTING LEASES AND TENANCIES. 12. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF RESIDENTIAL CONTRACT TO BUY AND SELL REAL ESTA'~E RECORDED AUGUST S, 198$ AT REC. NO. 880765.37. 09 NOTE: THIS EXCEPTION WILL BE DELETED UPON COMPLETION OF REQUIREMENT NO. 1. Planning Commission Minutes November 19, 1992 2. Staff recommends approval. Commissioner LANGDON seconded the motion. Commissioner QUALTERI moved that Case No. a two-lot minor subdivision for property Street be forwarded to City Council with Approval for the following reasons: Page 3 Motion carried 7-0. MS-92-2, a request for located at 4100 Quay a recommendation of 1. All requirements of the Subdivision Regulations have been met; and 2. Staff recommends approval. Commissioner RASPLICKA seconded the motion. Motion carried 7-0. B. Case No. WZ-92-7: An application by Richard .Todd for Phillip G. Haas for approval of a rezoning from Agricultural-One (A-1) to Planned Commercial Development (PCD) and for approval of a combined outline and final development plan and plat. This is a reconsideration of a Denial recommendation by Planning Commission at the October 15, 1992 public hearing. The applicant has submitted a revised development plan and plat for the property located at 5000 Robb Street. Mr. Gidley reminded Commission that Case No. WZ-92-7 had been previously reviewed October 18 at which time a recommendation of Denial was given. He presented the staff report, which included slides. Entered and accepted by the Chairperson were the Comprehensive Plan, Subdivision Regulations, case file and packet materials, slides and exhibits. Mr. Gidley read his memo dated November 19, 1992 a response to Plaza 5000 proposed development from the Board of Land Commissioners, who recommend denial based on the dedication for W. 50th Avenue. Commissioner QUALTERI had some concern about the mention, in the letter from the Board of State Land Commissioners, of SLB owning a portion of W. 50th Ave. Mr. Gidley explained that Robb Street is not a dedicated public street, but is a prescriptive right, which is a right earned by general public practice. He noted other areas of Robb Street not dedicated. Mr. Gidley doubted that SLB could close Robb Street at any time. Commissioner RASPLICKA questioned the need for a 16-inch water line going up Robb Street. Mr. Gidley stated a 16-inch water line is oversized for this particular development. He understood that Valley Water District requires the over-sizing based upon the assumption that there will be a need to service additional properties. He thought the Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 November 19, 1992 r developer of this project is financially responsible only for a 12-inch water line and then future owners would pay for the additional size. He further recommended that the northernmost one foot of W. 50th Avenue not be dedicated as a public street allowing the City of Wheat Ridge some control over access. Ivan Hawn, 4900 Robb Street was sworn in. Mr. Hawn stated he was the property owner to the south of the proposed development. 'He asked that Planning Commission use their best judgement when making a decision on this proposed development and that he and his neighbors would try to live with it. Richard Todd, 4570 Teller Street was sworn in. Mr. Todd stated he felt the staff had addressed the issue well and he was available to answer questions. Commissioner OWENS moved that Case No. WZ-92-7, a request for rezoning from A-1__to PCD and for approval of a combined outline plan and plat for property located at 5000 Robb Street be forwarded to City Council with a recommendation for Approval for the following reasons: 1. All requirements of the Subdivision Regulations have been met; and 2. The submittal meets the requirements for a combined outline and final plan and plat; and 3. The rezoning to Planned Commercial Development is generally compatible with the Industrial designation on the Comprehensive Plan. With the following conditions: 1. Asix-foot-high solid fence be shown along the southern property line; and 2. The entry design (i.e., brick veneer) be carried out on all sides of the buildings with public street exposure; and 3. The City of Wheat Ridge retain a one-foot strip of the north easement of the property; and 4. The Planning Commission recommends Approval of this rezoning and development plan and final plat, however, should City Council desire to approve the original plan submitted by the applicant instead of, the plan herein recommended, the Planning Commission would accept that decision without requirement of a referral back to the Planning Commission for another public hearing. missioner RASPLICKA seconded the motion. Motion carried 7-0. CERTIFICATION OF RESOLUTION CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION CASE NO: WZ-92-7 LOCATION: 5000 Robb Street APPLICANT(S) NAME: Richard Todd OWNER(S) NAME: Phillip G. Haas 8600 Ralston Rod., Arvada REQUEST: Approval of a rezoning from Agricultural-One to Planned Commercial Development and for approval of a combined outline and final .development plan and plat APPROXIMATE AREA: 3.5 acres WHEREAS, the City of Wheat Ridge Planning Division has submitted a list of factors to be considered with the above request,-and said list of factors is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, there was testimony received at a public hearing heard by the Planning Commission and such testimony provided additional facts. NOW, THEREFORE, based upon the facts presented and conclusions reached, it was moved by Commissioner OWENS, seconded by Commissioner RASPLICKA, that Case No. WZ-92-7, a request for approval of a rezoning from Agricultural-One to Planned Commercial Development and for approval of a combined outline and final development plan and plat for property located at 5000 Robb Street be forwarded to City .Council with a recommendation of Approval for the following reasons: 1. All requirements of the Subdivision Regulations have been met; and 2. The submittal meets the requirements for a combined outline and final plan and plat; and 3. The rezoning to Planned Commercial Development is generally compatible with the Industrial designation on the Comprehensive Plan. With the following conditions: 1. Asix-foot-high solid fence be shown along the southern property line; and 2. The entry design (i.e.; brick veneer) be carried out on all sides of the buildings with public street exposure; and Certificate of Resolution Page 2 Case IQO. WZ-92-7 3. The City of Wheat Ridge retain a one-foot strip of the north easement of the property; and 4. The Planning Commission recommends Approval of this rezoning and development plan and final plat, however, should City Council desire to approve the original plan submitted by the applicant instead of the plan herein recommended, the Planning Commission would accept that decision without requirement of a referral back to the Planning, Commission for another public hearing. VOTE: YES: Eckhardt, Quaiteri, Owens, Rasplicka, Langdon, DiCroce and Johnson NO: Nona I, Sandra Wiggins, Secretary to t Commission, do hereby and herewi Resolution was duly adopted by a their regular meeting held in the Building, Wheat Ridge, Colorado, .~~ Gam,. ith DiCroce, Chairperson HEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION he. City of Wheat Ridge Planning th certify that the foregoing 7_O vote of the members present at Council Chambers of the Municipal on the 19th day of November, 1992. San a Wiggins, S tary WHEAT RIDGE PLANNI COMMISSION <pc>resowz927b M E M O R A N D U M T0: / 1 •( 1_ ar3liing Commission FROM:1(V/},~_~ Glen Gidley, Director of Planning & Development RE: Board of Land Commissioners - Response to Plaza 5000 Proposed Development DATE: November 19, 1992 The attached response from the Board of-Land Commissioners, custodian of the state land adjacent to the north, indicates that they object to the requirement for West 50th Avenue. We have additionally received correspondence-from Arvada Planning Department with similar concerns, .based upon the BLC's response. I would recommend to you that you consider the Board of Land Commissioners' input the same as you would consider any other adjacent land owner and not grant a special privilege due to that ownership. Both the State and the City of Arvada received referrals each time the Comprehensive Plan was amended regarding the Major Streets Plan in this area, and they did not register a protest at those times. Additionally, both the State and Arvada were referred the Craig Chevrolet Subdivision, immediately adjacent to the east, and they did not protest the street dedication for West 50th Avenue along the north boundary at that time either. If you do .come to a favorable conclusion to this request by Plaza 5000, 2 would recommend. that in your motion to recommend approval to City Council, you include the following proviso: "Planning Commission recommends approval of this rezoning and development plan and plat, however, should Council desire to approve the original plan submitted by the applicant instead of the plan herein recommended, Planning Commission would accept that decision without requirement of a referral back to the Planning Commission for another public hearing." GEG:slw attachment <pc>ggmemoll/19a • BOARD OF LAND COMMISSIONERS 620 Centennial Building 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3454 Scott Price Urban Lands District Manager Commercial Leasing and Development Opportunities on State Land 566-3454 x304 November 18, 1992 Ms. ieredith Reckert - City of Wheat Ridge 7500 W. 29th Ave. P.O. Box-638 Wheat Ridge CO 80034-0638 Re: Plaza 5000_proposed development Dear Meredith: Department of Natural Resources Commissioners LUCY BLACK CREIGHTON ROBERT R. MAILANDER IOHN 5. WILKES III Thank you for the opportunity to respond to-this proposal. The State Board of Land Commissioners, for the state of Colorado, owns property immediately north and northwest of- the proposed development. The Board is constitutionally charged with maximizing revenue from such trust lands for_the support of public education throughout Colorado. In the pursuit of this mission, we seek development projects on our holdings, and development adjacent to our properties is typically beneficial to the SLB. However, we believe this instance to be different. By this letter, we are formally stating our opposition to this proposed project, and request that your Planning Commission deny approval based on the proposal's incomplete addressing of road and traffic requirements in this area. The proposal indicates a 30' easement for W. 50th Avenue, but the balance of the street easement would have to come from the SLB. In addition, the extension of Robb Street to the north to Ridge Road is not a dedicated easement. This access bisects the SLB property and may be inappropriate for any anticipated travel. The SLB has not been contacted by the developer to try to cooperatively resolve these issues. The State Land Board would very much like the opportunity to work with Wheat Ridge, Arvada and the developer to design_a workable street and access pattern beneficial.to all. Please delay any approval of this matter until this can be accomplished. Thank you. FOR .THE BOARD OF LAND COMMISSIONERS, S r e STATE~F COLORADO ~~~~~ Q~ ~/~j~~ •~,5~ s~, ~.Uo ~ ~ SS s 7~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ S~ z `~" ` "~ f r~~ r~, del ~ ,,, . 1 ~. ~ L ,•l.a INTRODUCED HY COUNCIL MEMBER PHIL EDWARDS Council Hill 35 ORDINANCE NO. 917 Series of 1992 TITLE: AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF REZONING FROM AGRICULTURAL-ONE TO PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT (PCD} AND FOR APPROVAL OF A COMBINED OUTLINE AND FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PLAT ON LAND LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 5000 ROBH STREET, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, ,STATE OF COLORADO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO,. THAT: Section 1• Upon application by Richard Todd for Phillip Haas for approval of rezoning in Wheat Ridge, Colorado, Case No. WZ-92-7, and based upon recommendation for approval from the Wheat Ridge Planning Commission, and pursuant to findings made based on testimony and evidence presented at public hearing before the Wheat Ridge City Council, Wheat Ridge maps are hereby amended to exclude from the Agricultural-One District and to include 'in the Planned Commercial Development District, the following described land: A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE SW1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST,. OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. SAID TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE N89o26'26"E, 663.61 FEET AND NOOo17'S1"W, 1090.60 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF B f TNNT ~~ THENCE NOOo17'51"W, 229.60 FEET; THENCE N89o29'40"E, 664.19 FEET; THENCE SOOo16'19"E, 229.60 FEET; THENCE S89o29'40"W, 664.09 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING SAID TRACT CONTAINING 3.50 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. Section Vested Prop R+ah s Approval of this combined outline and final development plan and plat does not create a vested property right. Vested property rights may only arise and accrue pursuant to the provisions of Section 26(c) of Appendix A of the Code of Laws of the City of Wheat Ridge. Section Safety Clause. The City Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is promulgated under the general police power of the City of Wheat Ridge, that it is promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare of the public, and that this Ordinance is necessary for the preservation of health and safety and for the protection of public convenience and welfare. The City Council further determines that the ordinance bears a rational relation to the proper legislative object sought to be attained. ;~ ;, ~• Ordinance No. 917 Case No. WZ-92-7 ~ ' 4, Page 2 Section 4. Severability. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, or part of this Zoning Code or the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall for any reason be adjusted by a court of competent ,jurisdiction invalid, such judgment shall not affect application to other persons or circumstances. Section 5. This ordinance shall take effect 1S days after final publication. INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first reading by a vote of g to ~_ on this 14th day of December 1992, ordered published in full in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Wheat Ridge and Public Hearing and consideration on final passage sat for January 25 19931 at 7:30 o'clock p:m., in the Council Chambers, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final reading by a vote of 8 to 0 this 25th day of January , 1993. SIGNED by the Mayor ~lr~ Wan a Sang, ity Cl~ on this 2 GTE day of nn , 1993: ~. ,v..-.w, Jlv . RA WINGE ., MAYOR 6$'K APPROVEZ) ~~CFORM~Y__ CITY ATTORNEY let Publication: December 24, 1992 2nd Publication: February 4, 1993 Wheat Ridge Sentinel Effective Date: February 18, 1993 <pc>ordwz927 3 ~. f i 1 .., P.O.ROX 638 ~ TELEPHONE: 303/237.6944 The City 7500 WEST 29TH AVf.NUE • wr1EAT RIOGE. COLORADO 90031 ~V~Ihea ~Ridg POSTING CERTIFICATION CASE N0. 02--42 PLANNING COMMISSION - CITY COUNCIL -BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (Circle One) HEARING DATE: ~'(y~~P{~2t.t ~S ~ / (`'q3 I, _ (~-"~~t,/~~ ~ , Dodd n a m e residing at ~S~O /~i-LC~zG2 s7' C~(„~}~ U~JF-v'L ~'~ , ( a d d r e s s as the applicant for Case No. /'Q~2^~2^~ , hereby certify that I have posted the Notice of .Public Hearing at G~CJGO tl`a ~ ~~ , ( l o c a t i o n') on this f~`_ day of f U~fynR ( , 19~~ , and do hereby certify that said sign has been posted and remained in place For fifteen (15) days prior to and including the scheduled day of public hearing of this case. The sign was posted in the position shown on the map below. 0~~% r~ -4 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE- __ _. _ _ - ThB Cify Of P.O. BOX 638 WHEAT RIDGE. CO 80034-0638 _ (303) 234-5900 (~ ~ ~L eat City Admin. Fax ~ 234-5924 Police Dept. Fax ~ 235-2949 ~ VTi~ lildge January 6, 1992 This is to inform you that Case No. WZ-92-7 which is a request for approval of a rezoning from A-1 to PCD and for approval of a combined outline and final development plan and plat for property located at 5000 Robb Street will be heard by the Wheat Ridge City Council in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex, 7500 West 29th Avenue at 7:30 p.m._ on January 25 1993 All owners and/or their legal counsel of the parcel under consideration must be present at this hearing before the ~; t~ roan .il As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to notify any other persons whose presence is desired at this meeting. If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division. Thank you. PLANNING DIVISION <pc>phnoticeform'' x i ~ N ~ N m '~.- x m a m fl.l ~ 9 ~ d~$' m L o ~ ~ y 'O N ~ E ~ Q ~ y ~ N _J N Q fIJ D' LL. ~ o m a~ ~ a m n W ~ A ~' ^ ^ c Z ~ ' F" U a' O ~ (V ~ Q m U ~ `p . O U d ~ N Q ~ ~ o t f L E . ~p d ~ r € k m a g `g o ~~ ~ pp E. aa ~~~ ~ ...~~1 .. ~ ~ .~~ ~ ~ ~ Q N ~j~ ' ` ~ ~ E ~35 ~ (3 ' ` ~ €~~ v .. ~~m ri Qi ~ ~ E~~ ~ v s~~o ' ,~ ~ u ~ t 4 S e ~ o a O C d U~'g ~ W w ~ y ~ V• Y .~ •• y p V gi0w ~mn 0 N tt~~vi E~~ `C¢ I ` a [ ~G E ~dL O zr~~a` ~a3i-~ '- ¢` W ~ M~ ~ ~...s...a M ~ i~... i~ i GF g~ a v. o~ °z Ew w 0o w r £o LL w o~ °_ g '~ o ~$ ~ a z ~ =~ ~w~ ~s~ M i ~~ ~ a ~ .a z ~_ ~ ~ ~. ~a i15 ~ i ~ ~ ~ t O •'{ os z ~ ~ 24E X26 E26 d m d ~ ~ N ~ r X N T~ m O N '~° m ~ a ' ri ~ ~ m i ~ ~ ~ m D {{ 3 g y N E E ~ N W_ s d m ti U N ' LL I o w¢¢ ~ ~ m n w > ~~'^^ ~ ~ ru F'' U '~ - ~3 C~ O r (V ~ ~' ~ ~ . o O ".' Q~ 4 ~ N N O a •: c E V V I~ - ~ ~ - s a ~ 9 ~~ y ~ y U U =y pp ry S y~$1 0 ry L y{ ` p6 G G N ~y~ o ~ m c ° w ~ `o L~m ti. ~ , H sE~ ^ ~ 2~ " E~~ ~ C~ V 4 ~ 0 o&e S3 ! o d ~ E ~ _° ~ {~ ~ {{{yyN~yy ~$~~ p~d mac C N ' c o m ~ j 3 ' M d _ 9 ~N N W ~ ~ ~E m ~ a °=p~ r~~= ¢ ~ d ..~ ~ :ei y E t E rv m zcg t~a`~<t5~m o ¢ Qi ~ "`~~~!! ~i I °o... _...~ ri 5 P U~U~V~V d m ~ m ai r j( ~ a ~ ~ m ~ > $ ~ c a d m a m yo~om Oy ~ ry ~ ~ N N U C N y d 0 3 ~ ~a m ° d ~" o y ¢ ¢ ~ a m _ 3 U O ~ (V Z N ~" Q ~ .E P ' - c c w c o 9~> p V d~V ~ y p~ 3 N Y~ WQ W LL a w ?~ U U }~ ~ fps n h a~~ 1+) E ,~' 3'S M'9 g -°m ` a m t o 5 u o 5ry ~ .a.~ ~ ~ '~ d m v v `~'m d nE5 _ ~ ~{ m ~ ~ `o `a°ma ~o m ~ oa„ ~ i Nam ?03 Li Cri N a ` te ka ~ a P'v fi_ m Q Q° ~~~ a E~¢ ~ (~ '~. has . t=s> .o a < ~ O A! j ~` _ ¢'g Ap [~ ~ '' a f 1 • S ` ~ c E EE 1UCg n`~6~~d i ¢ j ~ e ~ a i k9 a ~r W ...I'..~.. _ O. N ~ a ~+ a N ~ m m ,,, N N ~ J a 2 Qo Z 7 W ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ .-. N C 0 Q Q Z r I I r m d ~ > > f`') C ~ G m m ~ N ~ a ui cd o ~ w ~ w ' w~ a . Q a w w= ~ ~ w~ w o~ ~ ~ ~ o~ i ~ 91? ' " l ~~ a =o Q of ` Cam ~ Y,. 6O rr o0 s° LL r u . ~ ~ ~ ~" 'O I 3o LL ~ ~_ ~ ~ So Z KS ~ Q h I oy w ° ~ Si ~ ~ a~ w o xi is EJ v1 f ~ ~~ " a < z ~.i A 'fif ~ o~~~ ° o = ~ ~ M3 o =o~ " o ~ ~ ~ ~ o v. a U . _ ~ ~ I D N ~ I• ~ A ~ O p~`dZ ~ y I_ '.l' G" I O ~ ~ NM C 0 w O d~ ~ S6 z r w a F 4 f! ~ ~ L v ~- e Y 5 Z y i ~ L w A' ~3} tai I w w H~~ fYs ~~ w ~ a a w ~ ~ ¢ ¢ h E4E 026 E26 d ~ h`tE 026 E26 d Q1, 111 a w U W _~ N w N R y N r X ~ T w ~ ~ m m ¢ ? o Yo~o~ m w ~ °~~' E y v d ~ g ~ ~ a ~ o m ¢ ¢ - _~ °~' ^ ^ O ~ N 0 ~ E ~ _ ~' g d amp ~c~ v9'3{~ p~Oj L Ypgp11 p6p W ~yL E x'38 0 ogo ~ c ~.~ 4 a .E~~ ~ vo~ m O ON~ OLy ryWN0 ~~'~ `OV~ ¢~~ g C mfg o5n _~ o~~ , ~CC~ ¢ __ ~33~: r== ¢&~: III «~INIU~~ (i f O ~tr a 1 W Z 0 6 E U ~ ~ = U w w w Q ¢ N ~~ .~ m O D" ~ I^` m a F ~ ui l T a w U ~ ,O o ~, ~_ V -__ ~ f~ '~ f.} ~ ~ p1t v Y! N 4 I'{~ D p V it ~ ^ y ~ r~ L aa YY H~, ca ~.. ~ I" ~ ~ ~! `m a z' () __ N ro N $ x m T ~ .D u m ¢ ~ '~ Rl U fn ~ 4J m o ~.o m O t U N ~ h nl "' n 3 ~ a ~ 0 0 o w Q CC ~ E m QQ _ ' N.. o ~ z N o o r d .E ~' C ~ U~V'V~V y n g € '° E 43 , ~ ~ ~ ~ g V N ~~ ~yy !} y ~~ ~ .WW _" ~ ~ rY YI uNl N N ~L~ y ~ tt'~ E °}35 ~~ ~ vE s c 63 ~~~ a u ~, .. c E E~X 4g t`J v s ~ $ o SE M ~ V OGy a ~4 ~S L f ' y ( . V Y / Y'f ~bc~ ~¢~i O M FiV ~~ /iQ m u ~ m ~~~ ~ a dm~ . ° ~ > _. mw~ _~ ~ S~v.zN . o ¢ ~i~Gy ~ +ri . . w x V~N~9 V yy { ~ ~ "J wa P'I J~ N~~~E~~~9CJ . ~ - : .~ z ' ; ~ ~ ~A, rs p ~. a. A W i ~' ` ~ (W~ V y ~ i{' N JJ 61 T ~~~ W cY N 5'(E X26 E26 d a N aW O> Q o$c w a $N W 6 a ~o ~ rJ 6 N< V F D W_ o W U U ACT > )Ll~ N ~ ~ N ~ $ x m ~. ~ r' N ~ a N >~"o > ° mma ~ m io ~~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ N m o E y fU 0' v ~ 0 ~ i a N a a¢ °1 3 oh . a m a R3OO~ Z te- ~ O ~ ~ ~ a _ d =~ o = ` O. i ¢ n a .: ~+ N V V ~ E - ~ F -0 0 d g~ i U ca U V ~ 79 N~ ry~ •~L6 O W ~~~ ~y E ~' 35 0 m o~2 ~ Q c o Q Z h ~_~ a a - m c E E=~ ~{ y s`E OWN -~N6 ~' rv`aE $ § ~ ri~~ ~ ~ p q5F o'm- ~ n y E~~ EC¢ m -- __F k. a M_ _ 1 ~-l LJ4 r ~_ tea.-- _ ors- .. . ~ ~ ( - i e a s 4~y fVPV , ~M ~ ca ~rtypm \! i1 ,a ~'" v w A^,, .-[ y ~' ~ ~ ~~ ~ ,~'O ~ ~ f"j r~M r U C ~ w w w 9ZE 026 E26 d U'U~UV w a~ o p 2 u ~ O ~ ow ° g ~p W O u r F ~ d U ~ ,~ Lea 1" a w" U {~.~ N {~ d ~ y >'/~ ¢ N >(~ h m ~ ~ N ,w O ~ ~- w 2 '~ ¢ O ri ~ ~~ ~ - 4 v h i a y~ ~ 4 ~aM. ~ a `J ~ Z a 1SS M n ~. ~ 9 ' ~.s Ts' r+ A' ~ o '. ~ Q V m F a: at T! q Yf ~ i N m ~ ifD ~~ .. ~jj y ~ j " y N J ' y p Sy 0.'y I"~ $ V ~ W S~ Q. O m \~ ~ V ~ 9 1 ~ O p~ Z I ~ ~ M m E ~ o ~ LL cd a LL a w U w O W C~ G a c Z ~ v ~ ~ w w w 2 2 N L'f E X26 E2~ d -.. - _.___ d - -- F m y °'` d ~~ N g ~x-~ z o c 'a a' wx ~ Tw m a m w U a g ? mm ¢~ R7 ~ m a >c a > o '~ 4 W mo mp a? ~m ¢ ~ fsl ~ 2' aria m d w E O ~ W E°-dam h m m o O 0 Z fr ~ v `~ u~ o fi! ~ LL N ~ s fLl ~ m ~ 3 ~ ~ ~' °' °J N¢¢ ~" ~ v m c m Z 3 ~ -O ~' a ~ LL F ~ a ~' W o N ~ a w = ov~ia¢-- a m ~ ~ ad OC ~' ~ ~ Z 0-' ~T U N G 0 ^ o ~ (~ .~' ~~ -a U ~ ~ N X,,~• ~~ _ o O O ~ CV U Z Q' N ~ U ~ a i ~ O L °- i /-'l ~ ort W ~, y o a ~,J ' o ¢ ? O t ~ ~~ 5 ° 8 v ~ a ~ ~ ~ '€ `~ v ~ ro ^ y ~ n a F c ~ ~ aww ~ & o ~ E ~ aa~ 3 ~ im~ ~ vai~q ~./~. Y 8' .. _ G3 a ~$~ ~ Ysa r a ov ' _ o~~ ~ ~ ~~~' a g ~ ~ ' I ~ ~ - • v m C h ~ •O ~ ~~~ &4 C1 v o V m $ ) ~ ~~ ~ $ ~ i ~ ty ep h~$ a Vl fn ' ~° ~ oa a { ii j ~ ~ ~ F ° ~ ~ a ~ c O ~' o¢~ y ~ ~ ~ci ~, '~gwg N ~ ~¢ °v mud S ~¢ ~ ~ arc o~B .a ~ ~ ~ p 1 C ~ ti r \\ n I \~ '- W ~m ~ ~ `v. 5 `2Q + . ~s j ~ ~ yy ° ' E &c ' u f14 W 'V zc ~c4d~a 3F~tp¢ c 9 ._ o ~ ~g+oi m o`~ O o __ _ _ -- .. - .___.IfJ __ - l0 - . i _ ~ W f _ ° U V tl V d ~ C t f ~ 1 \ t a I . :. o ~ U F w w~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ya , F N u ~ { W 1 o ~. ~ ~ a { G ¢ w w= N~ ~ y ~ ~ a !\ ~ 1~8 ~ ~ w o . - a ~ as w: o ~= ~ i7tl ~ ~w o w= ~ ~ ~3 ~ ~LL ~ ~ r - o~ = w W I ~o LL e =o p u 6 Tt LL F i po ~~ ;,ems 8~ H ~ v as w ~ ~ I ~ =o s '~ ~o ~ ~ ~ ~ Y N6 V Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rt ~ 8 " ~ I +~ 'LS k l ~ . ~ C7 Af g O fF>4 ~ (~~r}} ( z - cwi Z 3~Yi W ~ £'a ~ Z W t-1 I ~ c~'i a W (n r u b ~ A_ ~ a N ~n a 6'CE 026 E26 d ` 2tiE 026 E:26 d .aJ.,._. CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT T0: City Council Date Prepared: Jan. 11, 1993 Date of Meeting: January 25, 1993 Case Manager:'Glen Gidley Case No. & Name: WZ-92-7/Todd Action Requested: Approval of a rezoning from A-1 to PCD & approval of a combined outline and final development plan & plat Location of Request: 5000 Robb Street Name & Address of Applicant(s): Richard Todd 8600 Ralston Rd., Arvada Name & Address of Owner(s): Phillip G. Haas 8600 Ralston Rd., Arvada Approximate Area: 3.5 acres Present. Zoning: Agricultural-One Present Land Use: Single-family residence/agricultural/planned Surrounding Zoning: N: City of Arvada; W, S: A-1: E: C-1 Surrounding Land Use: N, E: vacant/agricultural; S, W: single-family residence/agricultural Comprehensive Plan for Area: Industrial - - -------_ _------ - -------..----------------- Date Published: December 24, 1992 Date to be Posted: Date Legal Notices Sent: Agency Check List Related Correspondence ------------------------- ENTER INTO RECORD: (XX) Comprehensive Plan (XX) Zoning Ordinance January 11, 1993 January ll, 1993 (XX) Attached ( ) Not Required (XX) Attached ( ) None ------------------------------------ (XX) Case File & Packet Materials (XX) Slides (XX) Subdivision Regulations (XX) Exhibits JURISDICTION' The property•is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore there is jurisdiction to hear this case. City Council Staff Report Page 2 Case No. WZ-92-7/Todd I. REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a rezoning from Agricultural- One to Planned Commercial Development and for approval of a combined outline and final development plan and plat. The property is located at 5000 Robb Street and the purpose of the rezoning is for construction of three office/warehouse buildings. There is a small, single-family residence on the front of the property which will be demolished. II. DEVELOPMENT PLAN The applicant is proposing a combined outline and final development plan. The intent of the outline plan is for establishing land use allowances and general development parameters. Uses allowed within the development are C-1 and C-2 uses with outside storage. The development plan proposes three office/warehouse buildings with a total of 34,000 square feet of floor area.- All minimum setbacks for commercial development have been met. Buildings 2 and 3 show a small amount of screened outside storage. The buildings are oriented to the north with a secondary access to West 50th Avenue. Site date breakdown includes 22~ of building coverage, 31$ in paving and 25~ of landscaped coverage. Building height is limited to 50 feet.- Notes have been added regarding signage, landscaping and outside lighting. Existing trees which will remain have been shown. A six-foot-high solid fence is planned along the entire length of the southern property line to provide buffering for the residence to the south. Staff concludes that the requirements for a combined outline and final development plan have been met. II2. PLAT The applicant proposes a three-lot subdivision consistent with the platting requirement for planned developments. A 30-foot right-of-way dedication occurs for Robb Street. A 29-.foot right-of-way dedication is being shown for West 50th Avenue. A one- foot strip is dedicated to the City to enable us to control access points from the land to the north, which is in the city of Arvada. A storm water detention easement and cross-access/ingress-egress easement have been added to the plat face. City Council Staff Report Case No. WZ-92-7/Todd IV. STREETS Page 3 Pursuant to Case No. WPA-90-1, West 50th Avenue was removed as a Major Regional Arterial from the Major Streets Plan. However, the minutes from the April 23, 1990 City Council meeting indicated that the connection of local streets occur instead, including West 50th Avenue between Oak and Robb Streets. See Exhibit 'A'. Staff has requested a 30-foot right-of-way dedication for West 50th Avenue along the northern property line. The development plan and plat reflect this dedication. - In 1986, when the Craig Chevrolet development was approved, a 40-foot right-of-way .dedication occurred for West 50th Avenue. This street was never built but abuts the subject property_at the northeastern corner. Construction of the street on the subject property and adjacent property to the east would provide this link between Parfet and Robb Streets. Staff concludes that it is-clear that Planning Commission and City Council intended to improve east-west traffic circulation opportunities in this area. It is also clear that intention was established for West 50th Avenue by the requirement of a dedication upon the Craig Chevrolet Subdivision immediately to the east. Staff concludes that the amended plan and plat are consistent with the Major Streets Plan. V. AGENCY REFERRALS -. _ All agencies can serve the property with certain improvements. Valley Water District will require extension of a 16-inch water main from Robb Street Park. New eight-inch and 12-inch water mains are required on site. Arvada Fire District will require three hydrants.- They have no objection to the plan. City of Arvada indicates that the proposal will be consistent with the land to the north which is zoned PUD-I (Planned Office/Industrial -- Parks). They have no objection regarding West 50th Avenue dedication. Public Works is reviewing a drainage report and street construction plans for Robb Street and west 50th Avenue. State Land Board concurs with the 50th Avenue dedication. See attached Exhibit 'B'. VI. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING A meeting for neighborhood input was held on July 23, 1992.,_Enciosed under Exhibit 'C' is a synopsis of that meeting. City Council Staff Report Case No.. WZ-92-7/Todd VII. CRITERIA Page 4 1. That the change of zone is in conformance, or will bring the property into conformance with the City of Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan goals, objectives and policies, Comprehensive Land Use plan and other related policies or-plans for the area. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Industrial. Staff concludes that the proposed rezoning, uses allowed and development of the site would be compatible with this category. The Major Streets Plan amended per Case No. WPA-90-1 designates the West 50th Avenue corridor as a collector between Kipling Street and Ward Road. Staff concludes that because a dedication is shown for West 50th Avenue, the plan is consistent with the Major Streets Plan of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. That the proposed change of zone is compatible with the surrounding area and there will be minimal adverse impacts considering the benefits to be derived. Although there is adjacent residential development to the south, the applicant is trying to mitigate impact by placing buildings on the northern portion of the property as much as possible. An effort should be made to keep existing trees. A six-foot solid fence is shown along the southern lot line. 3. That there will be social, recreational, physical and/or economic benefits to the community derived by the change of zone. There could be economic benefits derived from the rezoning. 4. That adequate infrastructure/facilities are available to serve the type of uses allowed by the change of zone, or that the applicant will upgrade and provide such where they do not exist or are under capacity. The owner will be responsible for extending utility main lines to service the development. 5. That the proposed rezoning will not adversely affect public health, safety or welfare by creating excessive traffic congestion, create drainage problems, or seriously reduce light and air to adjacent properties. The project should not adversely affect public health, safety and welfare. 6. That the property cannot reasonably be developed under the existing zoning conditions.. The front of the property is currently being used as a single-family dwelling. City Council Staff Report Case No. WZ-92-7/Todd Page 5 7. That the rezoning will not create an isolated or spot zone district unrelated to adjacent or nearby areas. Approval of the development will not constitute spot zoning. 8. That there is a void in an area or community need that the change of zone will fill by providing for necessary services, products or facilities especially appropriate at the location, considering available alternatives. Approval o£ the project will .attract new business to the City of Wheat _ Ridge. Staff concludes that the criteria used to evaluate a rezoning generally support approval of this request, and, therefore recommends approval of the development plan. VIII. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION At their October 18 public hearing, Planning Commission reviewed a request for this property showing four office/warehouse buildings. A recommendation of Denial was given for the following reasons: 1. The property is located within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore there is jurisdiction to hear this case; 2. Without a dedication for West 50th Avenue, it is contrary to the Major Streets Plan; 3. Until such time as an alternate street plan is in place, - Commission does not feel comfortable in recommending approval; and 4. Staff recommends Denial.. See Exhibit 'D' which is a reduced version of the original submittal. Subsequent to that hearing, a revised plan was submitted showing a street dedication for West 50th Avenue. The revised plan and plat was reviewed by Planning Commission at a public hearing held on November 19, 1992. A recommendation of Approval was made for the following reasons: 1. All requirements of the Subdivision Regulations have been met; and 2. The submittal meets the requirements for a combined outline and final plan and plat; and 3. The rezoning to Planned Commercial Development is generally compatible with the Industrial designation on the Comprehensive Plan. City Council Staff Report Page 6 Case No. WZ-92-7/Todd With the following conditions:. 1. A six-foot-high solid fence be shown along the southern property line; and 2. The entry design (i.e., brick veneer) be carried out on all sides of the buildings with public street exposure;. and 3. The City of Wheat Ridge retain a one-foot strip of the north easement of the property; and 4. The Planning Commission recommends Approval of this rezoning and development-plan and final plat, however, should City Council desire to approve the original plan submitted by the applicant instead of the plan herein recommended, the Planning Commission would accept that decision without requirement of a referral back to the Planning Commission for another public hearing. The items stated under. condition numbers 1. and 3. have been incorporated into the plan being reviewed by City Council. IX. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Staff concludes that all requirements o£ the Subdivision Regulations have been met and that the submittal meets the requirements for a combined outline and final development plan. Staff concludes that rezoning to Planned Commercial Development is generally consistent with the Industrial designation on, the Comprehensive Plan, and with a dedication shown for West 50th Avenue the proposal is consistent with the Major Streets Plan. For these reasons a recommendation of Approval is given for Case No. WZ-92-7 with the condition that the entry design (i.e., brick veneer. or other material) be carried out on all sides of the buildings with street exposure. RECOMMENDED MOTION OPTION A: "I move that Council Bill No.. a request for rezoning from A-1 to PCD and for approval of a combined outline and final plan and plat for property located at 5000 Robb Street, be Approved for the following reasons: 1. All requirements of the Subdivision Regulations have been met; 2. The submittal meets the requirements for a combined outline and final plan and plat; and 3. The rezoning to Planned Commercial Development is generally compatible with the Industrial designation on the Comprehensive Plan. City Council Staff Report Case No. WZ-92-7/Todd With the following conditions: Page 7 1. The entry-design (i.e., brick veneer or other material) be carried out on all sides of the buildings with public street exposure," OPTION B: "I_moge that Council Bill No. a request £or rezoning from A-1 to PCD and for approval of a combined outline and final plan and plat for property located at 5000 Robb Street, be Denied for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. " OPTION C: I move that Council.Bi11 No. a request for approval of a combined outline plan and plat for property located at 5000 Robb Street, be Approved without dedication for West 50th Avenue as depicted in Staff's Exhibit 'D' for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. With the following condition: 1. Staff initiate a right-o£-way vacation for West 5Oth.Avenue where it abuts the Medved Chevrolet development as dedicated by Craig Chevrolet Minor Subdivision." <pc>srwz927 CASE N0. WZ-92-7 AGENCY .REFERRALS SUMMARY X Fire: (Arvadal Will require three hydrants. Schools: .. X Water: (Valley) Will require line extensions. X Sewer: IFrL,itdale) ~Vo response X US West Communications: rTO response X Public Service Co: No problems X State Land Use. Comm. (over 5 acres): No problems. State Geologist: _ State Highway: _ Jefferson County:(HEALTH, COMMISSIONERS, PLANNING) X Adjacent City: (Arvada) No problems. American Cablevison: X State Land Board: Concurs with right-of-way edication or F7, 50th Ave. CITY DEPARTMENTS X Public Works: Rav;Pw;ncJ dra~naae report and street construction. _ Parks & Recreation: _ Police: Building Inspection: pc/Agencyrefsum _I 1 ~- I, H' i ;:a CITY OF ~ I TCti ADA ;: z, N W Z ///\~~ J / O \\\ N N 6 ~ ` ~ W yp TX OVE 0~~% 88 STREFIT"PARK ;. PCD WZ-82-2 J~ L/ r , PARK R/D.GE ~ ~ wz-72-is CRAIG 0 d o ~WZ-8 6-IC bl I U 1 u - Wp~pv m ~~ a. ~ • W. I-70 FRONTAGE ROAD N ~-~ ~~ _~ - ---T-- - ---~~ ~ -- ~I - _, .~- ~ - _ ,. N 5 E w , ~ BDllNDED BY THE FOLLOWING STREETS: 52nd AVE. EXT. I-70 1' OA~N, ~t.^EX'F'^~ NIMMS ST. EXT. .. .... .......-_,. .....,n~-. n.. nn eTrom ,,rrn•, ^, .~,ucn nc~~pt naW FN T. r1R WZ-90 Z !f CASE NO. WZ-92-7 . EXHIBIT 'A' Su81ECt sr-cE 1 50TU AVER ~o~l '~ ~ II` - APPROVED COMP PLAN AMENDMENT MAJOR STREETS PLAN CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL 4-23-90 E+Cl-F f t3l-t' ~ g' STAT£ OF COLORADO BOARD OF LAND COMMISSIONERS 620 Centennial Building 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3454 Scott Price Urban Lands District Manager Commercial Leasing and Development Opportunities on State Land 866-3454 x304 Jas~.uary 8, 1993 Ms. Meredith Reckert - City of Wheat Ridge _ _- -- 7500 W. 29th Ave.,-- _ _ P.O. Box 638 _ _ Wheat Ridge CO 80034-0638.. Re: Plaza 5000 proposed development Dear Meredith: ,- Department of Natural Resources Commissioners LUCY BLACK CREIG HTON ROBERT R. MAILANDEft IOHN S. WILKES III In a 1et.ter of Novembber_ 18, _1992, the Land. Board. requested that your. Planning Commission deny this development because we had not been-contacted and therefore had_no opportunity for input into the access and roadway patterns related to this proposal. Your invitation to meet and discuss this issue on November 20, 1992 was welcome and the discussion-was informative. Land Board staff would like to thank you for addressing our concerns. The Board of-Land Co::LL.issioners supports your staff reccmme.^~dation to acquire a right-of-way for West 50th Avenue as part of your approval process. we have no other concern or objection to express at this time. Thank you for the opportunity to discuss this proposal and we look forward to continued cooperatior><,in the future. Sincerely, Scott Price r~f~n"` `~'~~~ I1~~~8+! ,_ ~ 19tJ3 ~j~C ,. PLAIvP)i°du & 4EUELOPP~E~vF 75Q0 WEST 29TH AVENUE The City of P.O. BOX 638 - WHEATRIDGE.C080034-0638 (303)_234-5900 R~TLeat City Admin. Fax # 234-5924 Police Dept. Fax # 235-2949 ~ ~idge February 2, 1993 Mr. Richard Todd 8600 Ralston Road Arvada CO 80002 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Please let this letter serve as notification that property located at 5000 Robb Street has been rezoned by the City of wheat Ridge from Agricultural-One to Planned Commercial Development. Final action was taken by City Council at a public hearing held on January 25, 1993, where the rezoning and combined outline and final development plan and plat were approved. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me at 235- 2848. Sincerely, - Meredith Reckert Planner MR:slw cc: wZ-92-7 i ~i Nncrlyd Pep~a CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: January 25, 1993 Page -2- Motion by Mr. Flasco to approve the application for a new Class C - Club License for George G. Klumker Chapter 4F22, Disabled American Veterans, 4901 Marshall Street, Wheat Ridge, Colorado, for the following reasons: 1. A11 applications and fees required by statute have been filed and paid. 2. Notice of hearing and posting of the premises have been accomplished according to statutory requirements. 3. .The applicants will be entitled to occupancy of the premises by virtue of a signed Deed of trust, dated June 13, 1949. 4. The applicants have been cleared by the Police Department. 5. The evidence adduced at the Public hearing on January '25, 1993 established that the desires of the residents of the neighborhood under consideration are for granting this license, as evidenced by petitions bearing 87 signatures in favor of issuance, 11 signatures in opposition, and 2 signatures evidencing n'o opinion and that issuance of this license is consistent with the needs of the neighborhood under consideration; seconded by Mr. Shanley; carried 8-0. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ORDINANCES ON SECOND READING Item 2. Council Bill 35 - An Crdinance providing for the approval of rezoning from Agricultural-One to Planned Commercial Development (PCD) and for approval of a Combined Outline and Final Development Plan and Plat on land located at approximately 5000 P,obb Street, City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado. (Case No.=X2.;-77 (Richard Todd for Phillip Haas) Council Bill 35 was introduced on second reading by Phil Edwards; title read by the Clerk; Ordinance No. 917 assigned. Glen Gidley presented the case and entered exhibits into the record. Richard Todd, 4570 Teller Street, applicant, was sworn in by the Mayor and asked for approval of the rezoning. Motion by Phil Edwards that Council Bill 35 (Crdinance 917), a request for rezoning from A-1 to PCD and for approval of a combined outline and final plan and plat for property located at 5000 Robb Street, be approved for the following reasons: 1. All requirements of the Subdivision Regulations have been met. 2. The submittal meets the requirements for a combined outline and final plan ad plat; and 3. The rezoning t Planned Commercial Development is generally compatible with the Industrial designation on the Comprehensive Plan. With the following condition: The entry-design (i.e. brick veneer or other material) be carried out on all sides of the buildings with public street exposure; seconded by Mr. Shanley. Mrs. Brougham asked to amend the .motion to change the wording on the plat from "existing water main" to "proposed water main". This was accepted by motion-maker and second, i4otion carried 8-0.