HomeMy WebLinkAboutWZ-94-4~ ~. • ~ -. ... ..._. . .
~ ` E:
, . F~'B.s2 3 1994 1=;`
. ~~~
• , ~
~ ~
Krager and Assodates, Inc.
F
r ~.
February 22, 1994
Mr. Pau1 Crabtree
Colorado Land Consultants
8480 East drehard Road, Suite 2000
Englewood, Colorado 80111
re: Wheat Ridge Wal`-Mart ExpanSion
file: 2.~4111pc
Dear Paul:
Per pour request, I have reviewed the Wal-Mart proposal to expand
their store in Wheat Ridge, Colorada from 105,000 square feet to
130,000 square feet.
Although trip generation rates are traditionally applied to the
qross square footage of a building, the assumption that traffic
mill inorease in direct proportion to the building size would not
be valid in this aase. The expansion of the Wal-Mart Store will
accommoclat~ a larger inventory of stock in a more spacious
design. This redesign of the sfiore arill provide better retail
services to their eaistinz~ cus`tomers and, hopefully, increase the
amount o~ merohandise that each customer purchases.
The retail market ~or this Wal-Mart has already been well
es~ablished. An expansion of the retail area is unlikely to draw
new customers to Flal-Mart who are not currently shopping at Wal-
Mart. I would expect orrly a smali increase in traffic generaked
by this site expansion.
The site wil7. continue to have goo$ acaes~ to three arterial
str~ets: Wes~ 38th Ave~nue, West 32nd Avenue, and Youngfield
Street. This access arrangment allows £or a dispersion of trips
throughout the site. It is my opinion that the access points to
this site will operate verp similarly ta their current level.
If you have any questions regarding this infoYmation, piease feel
free to call me.
Sinc~rely,
/
~h een . Rr er, P.E.
4090 Estes Street Wheat Ridge,'Colorado 80033 (303J 425-0805 FHX ~303~ 467-Z354
8480 E. Orchard Road •
Sulte 2000
Englewood, Colorado 60117
(303) 770-5600
FAX (303) 770-2349
Colorado
Land
Consultants, Inc.
March 4, 1994
Mr. Glen Gidley
Director of Planning and Development
City of Wheat Ridge
PO Box 638
7500 West29th Avenue
Wheat Ridge, CO 80034
RE: Applewood ~Ilage
Wal-Mart Expansion
Dear Glen:
~
Planning/Engineering~Land Surveying
Landscape Architecture
The proposed expansion ofi the Wai-Mart Store at Applewood Vilage Shopping
Center wiil have negligible impact on drainage for the site. In fiact, the impervious
surface area wili decrease since the building expansion will take place over existing
paved surfaces and landscape planters will be added. No change in drainage paths
or quarrtities are anticipated.
Please call if you have any questions or comments.
Sincerely,
` uu DO LAND ~NSULT~TS, INC.
~ ~
Paui Crabtree, EIT
Project Manager
M affliate of Civil Land Consultanis, Inc.
~ ~
rne c~ry ot
ADMINI5TRATIVE PROCESS APPLICATION
~Wheat
~Rid e Department of Pianning and Development
g 7500 West 29th Ave., Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Phone (3Q3) 237-6944
Applicant General Manaqement Co. }lddress 13900 E. Harvard Ave. phone 671-5220
Aurora, CO tsUU14
Owner General N3anagement Co. Addres's same as above Phone 671-5220
Location of request Applewood Village Shopping Center 38th & Young£ield
Type o£ action requested (check one or'more oP
the actions 7.isted below
which pertain to your request.)
] Change of zone or zone conditions
~ Site development plan approval
Special use permit
Conditional use permit
' Temporary use/building permit
Minor subdivision
a Subdivision
Preliminary
Final
j] ** See attached procedural guide
for specific requirements.
variance/Waiver
Noncon£orming use change
~ Flood plain special exception
~ Interpretation o£ code
Zone line modi£ication
s Public Improvement Exception
Street vacation
Miscellaneous plat
~ Solid waste land£ill/
mineral extrac~ion permit
^ Other
Detailed Descr3ption of request ~ndment ~#5 (Phase 1) of Planned Commercial
Develoz~nent; in order to expand wal-MarL 5rore. _~ __
List all persons and companies who hold an interest in ' "
the described real
property, as owner, mortgagee, lessee, optionee, etc.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
C,~neral Manaaement Canpanv 13900 E. Harvas'd 1~ve. Aurora, CO 80014 671-5220 ,K., ~
~
I certify ~that the information and_exhibits rewith submitted are
he true and
correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, I
am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above,
without whose consent the requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished.
Applicants other than owners must submit power-of-attorn from the owner
which approved o£ this act'o o~n> his b half. ~
Signature of Applican ~L~+%~'l _ ~'~~~• ._ /
i ,,~T~ /~
scribed and sworn to p+~his ~~' day of , 19 %
~-~~a~~~~..T....-_-- / , -
! PAM~i.~~ ~~~~. ~;c~; irvso~ r y ~~1 fi ~~~ '~,~ ~
~
,7,.r
N '"F~RI , L;.~t_I:; ~r ~ -:
Notary P~bli~ j:=a ~;:~~~iia~iV~~~~y'ty~y ~~''
SE~+Ti6aTEOr.~-~ni.Uf'~"..i)p l , t~'~C~~f31fv~
~~-«a- =-~~-~ My commission expires
y
Date Received ,~-/d-~~/~}" Receipt No. _. ~ll~,~~ _ Case No.
, ~
~
ffiIBIT A
PAGE 1
A. SUBORDINATION, ATTORNMENT AND NON DISTURBANCE AGREEMENT E2ECORDED JANUARY
23, 1991 AT RECEPTION NO. 91mm6426. (AFFECTS PARCEL 3}
B. AN EASEMENT FOR UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES GRANTED TO PUBLIC
SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED_ FEBRUARY 5, 1991 AT
RECEPTION NO. 91m10272. (AFFECTS FARCEL 3)
C. FINANCING STATEMENT F'ROM FRED SCHMID APPLIANCE AND TV, D[+:BTOR, TO
GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORP., RECORDED FEBRUARY 1.9, 1.991 AT RECGPTION NO.
91m13958. (AFFECTS TENANTS LEASEHOLD INTEREST)
D. FINANCING STATEMENT FROM GERALD M. BIEHL, DEBTOR, TO METRO NORTH STATE
BANK, SECURED PARTY, RECORDED FEBRUARY 10, 1992 AT RECEPTION NO. 92014109.
(AFFECTS PARCEL 3)
E. F'INANCING STATEMENT FROM GERALD M.
HANIC, SECURED PARTY, RECORDED JANUARY
( AF~'ECTS PARCEL 1 AND 2)
BIEHL, DEBTOR, TO METRO NORTH STATE
15, 1992 AT RECEPTION NO. 92005130.
F. ANY AND ALL LEASES AND TEDIANCZES.
NOTE: UPON COMPLETION OF' ITEM 3 OF SCHEDULE B- SECTION l, ITEM NO. F ABOVE
WILL BE AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: RIGHTS OF TENANTS, AS TENANTS ONLY,
UNDER THE FOLLOWING UNRECORDED LEASES AFFECTING THE PROPERTY. (TO BE
PROVIDED}
G. APPLE4JOOD VILLAGE ADDITION OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN RECORDED JUNE 1m,
1992 AT RECEPTION NO. 92069129. .
H. FIRE LANE EASEMENT AS GRANTED TO CONSOLIDATED MUTUAL WATER COMPANY,
RECORDED SEISTEMBER 18, 1992 AT RECEPTION NO. 92116833. (AFFECTS PARCEL 3)
I. Deed of Trust from APPLEWOOD VILLAGE SHOPPING GENTER, A COLORADO
GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, to the Public Trustee of JEFF~RBON County, for the
benefit of METRO NORTH STATE HANK, securing an original' principal
indebtedness of 55,632,451.24, and any other amounts and/or obligations
dated OCTOBER 15, 1992, recorded OCTOBER 16, 1992 AT RECEPTION NO.
92132347.
Assignment of Rents in connection with the above Deed of Trust recorded
OCTOBER 16, 1992 AT RECEPTION NO. 92132348.
J. Financfng Statement from APPLEWOOD VILLAGE SHIPPING CENTER, Debtor, to
METRO NORTH STATE BANK, Secured Party, recorded OCTOBER 16, 1992 AT
RECEPTION NO. 92132349.
K. TAE EFFECT OF SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 5, 1992 AT
RECEPTION NO. '920142828.
L. AGREEMENT FOR USE AND POSSESSION OF REAL PROPERTY BETWEEN APPLEWOOD
VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER, A COLORADO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP AND THE CITY AND
COUNTY OF DENVER, RECORDED MARCH 12, 1993 AT RECEPTION NO. 43032730
(AFFECTS PARCELS I AND 2).
CONTIN[TES.........:.
-. .~ ~ i
EXIiiBIT ~., PAGE 2
L. AGREEMENT FOR USE AND POSSESSION
VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER, A COLORADO
COUNTY OF DENVER RECORDED Mr~RCH 12,
(AFFECTS PARCELS 1 AND 2)
~
OF REAL PROPERTY BETWEEN APPLEWOOD
GENERAL PARTNERSHIP AND THE CITY AND
1993 AT RECEPTION DIO. 93032730.
M. EASEMEYST AND RSGHT OF WAY S~TWEEN APPLEWQOD VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER, A
COLORADO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP AND TAE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER RECQRDED
NOVuMBER 10, 1993 AT RECEPTTON NO. 93186124. ,
S~,Ci.JR=TY =TLE GtTAR.ANT COMPANY
> 994,5 GREENWOOD PLAZA Bl,~ SUSTE llm GREENWOOD V~GE, CO 80111 (303)
-` 22m-9999
4
SCHEDULE A
Commitment No: £~H71217-4
1. Commitment Date: JANUARY 4, 1994 at 8:0m A.M.
2. Po11cy or Policies to be issued: Policy Amount
{a) Owners Policy - Proposed Insured: 50.00
{b) Loan Policy - Proposed Insured: S16,b50,e00.m0
GW1534002: 107.12
AIATIODiGIIDE LIFE IN5URANCE
COhIPANY, AN OHTO CORPORATION
(c) Proposed Insured: ` S0.0m
3. Fee simple interest in the land desc~ribed in this Commitment is
owned, at the Commitment Date by:
APPLEGIOOD VILLAcUE SAOPPING CENTER,
A COLORADO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
4. The land referred tb 1n this Commitment is described as follow5:
~.. y
SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTIC~1 ATTACHED HERETO
AND MADE A PART HEREOF .................
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO
(for informational purposes 'only} 3240-3300 YOUNGFIELDIIIZ556 W. 38TH AVE.
PREMIUM:
Owners........... 50.00
Mortgage......... Sm.00
I Mortgage......... 50.00
I: Z'ax Cert......... 5120.00
Form - 107.12..... S2,372.00
Form - 110.1 ..... 50.00
JAN 12, 1994 wkl MB
Form No. 1344-8 (1982)
ALTA•P2ain Language Com~enC , .
• SCHEDULE B - Section S
Order No. DH71217-4
Requirements
The following requirements must be met:
(a) Pay the agreed amounts for the interest in the land and/or for the
mortgage to be insured.
'(b) Pay us the premiums, fees and charges for the policy.
(c) Obtain a certificate of taxes due from the county treasurer or the
county treasurer's authorfzed agent.
(d) The following documents satisfactory to us must be signed, delivered
and recorded:
1. An ALTA/ACSM Lan~ Tit1e Survey in form, content and certification'to
SECURITY TITLE GUARANTY COP4PANY and FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
as may form the basis for issuing endorsement FORM 100 in connection with
the LOAN policy to be issued hereunder and/or deletion of items 3-4 from
Schedule B of the FORM 107.12 EbIDORSEMENT policy ~o be issued.
NOTE: Exception may be made to any adverse matters disclosed by the
ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey.
NOTE: THE ABOVE SURVEY REQUIRES A CURRENT CERTIFICATION DATE.
2. PROVIDE A LETTER IN A FORM ACCEPTABLE TO THE COMPANY FROM THE ZONING
DEPARTMENT STATTNG.THE FOLLOWING:
A) ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF SAID LAND.
~, _
B) DEFINITI~N OE~ USE OR USES iSNDER SAID CLASSIFICATTON, TOGETHER ,.WITH ANY
CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS OR REQUIREMENTS THEREOF.
C) THERE ARE NO,PRESENT VIOLATIONS OF,TAE APPLICABLE ZONING, INCLUDING, BUT
NOT LIMITED TO: BUILDING SITE AREA, FLOOR SPACE AREA, BUILDING SETHACKS
AD1D STRUCTURE HEIGHT.
3. PROVIDE THE COMPANY AN AFFIDAVIT AND SNDEMNITY AS A NON-RECORD TITLE
RIGHTS FOR REVIEW TO DETERMINE THE DELETION OF PREPRINTED EXCEPTIONS NO. 2-
OF SCAEDULE B- SECTION 2.
4. The following items, which may not necessarily be recorded, must be
furnished to the Company to its satisfaction to-wit:
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATIOI~ SHALL BE S[3BMITTED TO THE COMPANY FOR REVIEW TO
DETERMINE WHETAER MECHANICS LIEN PROTECTION MAY HE GRANTED ON THE POLICY TO
BE ISSUED L3NDER SCHEDULE A, PARAGRAPH 2(B): (A) COhITRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT
(SEE CONTINUATION OF SCEIEDULE B- SECTION 1, IF AI3Y, OAI NEXi PAGE)
(CONT~TION OF SCHEDULE B- SEC~7 1)
~ • , `~
5. Th2 "AffldaVit 2rid Indemnity to FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY"
signed by the parties in Paragrapri 3, 8chedule A of this Commitment and
notarized.
6. THIS COMMITMENT IS SUBJECT TQ SUCH REQUIREMENTS AND/OR EXCEPTIONS AS
MAY BE DEEMED NECESSARY UPON REVIEW OF CONIMITMENT BY COUDTSEL FOR THE
COMPAtdY, ITS AGENTS OR SUSSIDIARIES.
~~~
I:EFAL DESCFSPTIOY - CCfi4i~E37T P?0. . 1TH71217 •
' P,~RCEZ 1: A portion of th~ East ane-half o~ th~ North~rest ont-quarts=
o~ 5ection 29. T~wnship 3 So~ath. Range 54 ~Jest o# tha 6th P. ?S..
d~scribed ss t'ollovs: Be~inning at a point 654.32 ~~2t North of t3~t
South Iine og r.},~ Northwest one-quarter~of said Seetion 29, and 60.00
feet Ea~t of the West lir.e of i3;~ E~st one-ha~f of thz North~tst
one-quartes o~ ~aid 5eciion 29: thence N 0 da~ra~s 51.8' H par~Iltl ta
4h~ ~Tast iin2 af t5e East one-half of the Northwest one-qusr~~r of.
said S~ction 29 a dist~nce og 6d7.82 f~et to the 5outh line of the
Nnrtheast on~-quarter of the North~aest os~~t-quarter of said S~ctios~ 29:
thance N 89 degr~~s 2$.1' £ along the South Iiae of the 3Jorti:-ast
onz-e~unrztz oP thP Northwest one-quarttr o~ said Section 29 a diet~ase
of 150.00 fe~t: thence N 0 degzees 51.8' 3I p~rallel to thm W€st line
ef ~~e East one-half of th~ h'orth~+QSt one-qusster o~' said SPcYion 29 s
dist~nce of 30D.90 feet; thence 5 39 degrees 28.1' W yarallel to the
Sou~h lin~ of the Nor-~~~ast on~e-quarter of the Northwess one-quast~r
of'~said S~c2ion 24 a discance Qf 150.04 €eat; thene,e N ~ deareQs 51.8'
it parallel to thv S~~st line of the East ~ne-half of the Nortnveat
or.z-quartez of seid Section 29 n distance o~ 135.19 feet to a poiat of
curvature: tDence on e curve to the right whos? zadius is 182.00 ~Pet.
and whose chord bears N 37 degraes S1.]' E a distanc~ of 227.5fi fset
t~ a point o~ t~ngQncy: thenca N ~5 d~grets 34.4' E along the
~~uzherly liae of Nest 33th Avenue s distane• of 7U1.69 fe~t to tht
?~orth~~r~st corner of RIDGEVIEW ACRES TH'r .J FILING. A Platt~d
• Subdivision in the o#ficial records o£ 3effezson County. Calor~do:
th~nce 5 L' degr~es ':3.5' £ a1on~ the West lina o£ s~id RIDGEVIEk' ACRES
THIRD FIZING a distanc~ of 670..1 Pe~t to tae South line of t~e
Nu*thea~t one-quart€r of the Northwest one-quart~r of said Se~ti3on 29;
th~nce 5 89 d~grees 28.1' H aiong the South line o£ th~ ~lorth~asti
orse-quaztar o~ the horth~est on~-qua.rter of said Section 29 a diat~nee
of 0.57 ~':st Lo ~ point vhich is•~85 feet East of the West lin~ af
th~ East on~-half of th~ I~orthvest on~-qu~rt~er of said Section 29.
th~nz~ S 0 degrees 51.8' £ par~llzl t~ the iJest Iine af the Eaat
~~~s~±-hal~ of th~ NorLhwest one-qusrter of ~aid Szction 24 a dis~~a~ct of
1152.99 f~€t to a poini 150.00 f~et North of ~~i~ South line o£ the
~osth~+est one-quartez o~' said S~ctSon 29: ~hence S 89 degrees 31.7' W
psrall=2 zo th~ South line of the Northvest one-qu~rtez ef raid
•~'Ssction 29 a dist~nce af 192.34 feet: th~nce S 8 d~egrams 51.8' E
pasallel La th~ West liae o# the East one-half of the Northwest
or.~-~uast~r e~ said Sec°tion 29 a distance o~ I30.OD feet: thenct S 89
ddgsees 31.7' W pera21e1 to the South line of the Nosehvest
on~-.~umrter ~f aaid 5ection 24 a~3fstanzt of 342.fi6 feei to a poi~t
350.00 f~at Esst of th~ Hast line of the East one-half o£ thc
~torth•,~est oa~:-qunr2er of aaid Section Z9; thence N 0 degrees 51.8' W
psr~lls2 Lo Ehe West liae of thz East one-half of the N9r2hw~est
on~-qu~rt~z of said Saction 29 a distance of 600.40 fPet: thense 5 89
s3~greas 31.7' td par~llel to ihs Sou~h 13na of ih~ Northvest
ona-qu~rt~r of ~aid Section 24 a d?,s?ance of 150.00 f=zt; th~ncs N 0
degz~~s S1.$' 6~ parall•el to ~he Wzst lin~ of' the B~st one-half of tht
North~.~esL an~-quart~r o£ said 5~ct3bn 29 a dis*ance o~ 24.32 fset:
th~nc~ S 89 dagzees 31.7' W parallel to th~ Sovth lins of t~e
Northw~s~ on2-quAster of Sect3o~ 29 a distancz qf I40.00 f~~t Lo t~e
Tru~ Yoint af Beginning. Coun~ty of•J~ffer~on. S"taie of Colorado.
~~GE i OF 2
7,E~C,~I~ DESraIPx7o~d (corrratru~ot~t't~~'r ?a~. DH7i21~
~A..QGEL 2:
LoLa 19 and 20.
$lock !,
APPLr'~'OOD VSLE.ACE,
County of Jeffxrs~a,
Siat¢ af Colorsdo.
•
PA~CEL 3: That part of the 5outheast quarter of the Vorthw~st quarter
of Section 29. Tdwnship 3 Soveh, Rang~ 59 ~I~sr of th~ Seh Princ3pal
Mazidisn. in the City of Wheat Rid~+e. Gounty of Jeff~s~on. State of
Colas~do described as: Co~^encing at th~ ~oint of intersection of th~
East ri~Y~t of w~y line o£ Yaungfield Street and the South li~e of ~he
RTerthwest quarter of said Section 2?. wh~nce 3he W~st quart~r es~rntr
of a33d Section 29 bears South 89 d~gre~s 32 minutrs 12 sxconds LJest.
13&2.42 fe~t nnd the Southwest corner of the South~ast quarter of said
2~oz~hwest quarter bears 5outh 89 degrees 31 minu2es 12 sec~nds Wsst
64.~0 fe~i: zunning thencQ North OD d~gr~ees 51 minutes 48 seconds
Hzst, p~rnli~l with th~ ~iest line o£ said Sovthenst quarter o£ zhc
~'orthwest quartes and along said East rig`t of way Iin+e +~f %ou~~fi~1d
Street. 190.00 f~et to the True Point of Beginning: ther.ce coneinuing
al~ng said £ast right of way lin2. AForth 00 de~rzes 51 minu~ts~s 48
~ecands ilest 274.32 feet: thence 1eev3ng said East righ4 0£ way Iin~
Morth ~9 3egrees 31 minutes 12 aeconds East. parall~l wit4 the Sauth
lin~ of said Northaes~ quarter. 150,00 feet; 2henc~ Nosth 00 degre~s
51 minutes yB seconds West, parallel with said East sight of way ISne
175.58 ~'~~t: thence North 84 dagrees 31 miaut2s 12 seconds East 150.00
f~et: tnenc~ South DO degrees 51 minut~~ 48 secoads East. par~ll~l
u~ith sa3d £ast right of way line. 450.00 feet: thence South S9 degr~~s
32 min+ltes 12 second West parallel wish the South lin~ of sald
37or~hwzst quartPr. 290.00 feet, more or less. 2o th~ Trux Point of
Beginning, Coun2y af J~fferson. Szat~ of Colosado.
PilGE 2 OF 2
' , ~
~
Form No.1344-B2 (CO-88)
ALTA Plair. Language Commitment
SCHEDULE H - Section 2
Order No. DH71217-3 __
Exceptions
Any policy we issue will.have the following exceptions unless they are
taken care of to our satisfactiun:
1. Taxes--and Assessments not certified to the Treasurer's Office.
2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the
public records but wtzich could be ascertained by an inspection of the land
or by making,inq~_tiry of persons in possession thereof.
3. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records.
4. Discrepancies, conflirts in boundary lines, shortage in area,
encroacnments, and any facts which a correc~ survey and inspectzon of the
land would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records.
5. Any li~n, or right to a lier., for services, labor or material
heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the
public records.
6. .Any and all unpaid taxes, assessrnents and unredeemed ta:: sales. _
7. THAT, EXCEPT AS OTHERWiSE EXPRL~'SSLY PROVIDED HEREIN, THERE ARE NO LIENS,
ENCUDtBRANCES OR OTHER MAT'TERS SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS, A'r'FECTING SAID
ESTATE OR INTEREST, OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN IN SAID POLICY NO. GW1534002,
EXCEPT: _
` • .
~
w-~• ~
NOTICE TO PROSPECTIVE OWNERS
{A STATENIENT MADE AS REQUIRED BY COLORADO
INSURANCE REGULATION 89-2)
GAP PROTECTION
When this Company conducts the c].osing and is responsible for recording or
filing the legal documents resulting from the transaction, the Company
shall be responsible for_a11 matters which appear on the recorci prior to
such time of recording or filing.
MECHANIC'S LIEN PROTECTION
If you are a buyer of a single family residence you may request
mechanic'.s lien cove~age to be issued on your policy of insurance.
If the property being purchased has not been the sub~ect of
cori5trc,~ction, improvements or repair in the last six months prior to the
date of this commitment the requirements will be payment of the appropriate
prernium and__the compietion of an AfEidav+_t And Indemnity by the sel.ler.
If the property beinq purchased was constructed, improved or repaired
within six months prior to the date of this commit!~ent the requirements may
in~olve disclo~ure of certain financial information, payment of premiums,
and inctemnity, among others.
The general requirements statect above at~e subyect to the revision and
approval of the Company.
SPECIAL.TAXING DISTRICT NOTICE
(A Notice Given In Conformity W~th Section 10-11-122 C.R.S.)
The sub7ect land may be located in a special taxing district; a certificate
of taxes due listing each taxing ~urisfliction sha11 be obtained from the
coianty treasurer or the county treasurer's authorized agent; and
information regarding special districts and the bouttdaries of such
d'lstricts may be obtained from the board of county commissioners, the
county clerk and recorder, or the county assessor.
~~~
~
7500WEST29THAVENUE .
P.O. BOX 638
WHEAT RIDGE. CO 80034-0638
City Admin. Fax # 234-5924
March 11, 1994
(3Q3) 234-5900
Police Dept. Fax # 235-2949
~
The City of
~Wheat
~Ridge
The Wheat Ridge Department of Community D,evelopment has received a request
for _aAbroval of an amendment_ to a Planned Commercial Development
~~n~~ r7ctsalnrlmPn} ~lan ~ ~ " ' ..
'_at_the property described below.
Your response to the following questions and any comments,on this proposal
would be appreciated by p,qarr:h ~F iaaa . No response from you b this
Y
date will constitute no ob~ections or concerns regarding this proposal.
CASE NO: WZ-94-4
LOCATION: 3600 Youngfield/General Management Company
REQUESTED ACTION: Approval of an amendment to the Applewood Village
Shopping Center final development plan
PURPOSE: Z5,OOb square foot expansion of existing Wal-Mart Store
APPROXIMATE AREA: 11.02 acres
1. Are public £acilities or services provided by your agency adequate to
serve this development?
YES NO If "NO", please explain below.
2. Are service lines available to the development?
YES NO . If "NO", please explain below.
3. Do you have adequate capacities to service the development?
YES NO I£ "NO", please explain below.
4. Can and will your agency service -this proposed development subject to
your rules and regulations?
YES NO . If "NO", please explain below.
5. Are there any concerns or problems your agency has identified which
would or should a£fect approval of this request?
Please reply to%~~~Gi+~~v ~~~~ . nrt Rarkar+
Department o£ Planning & Development
DISTRIBUTION:
XX Water District (Consolidalted Mutual Je££erson Co. Health Dept.
XX Sanitation District (Westridgel Je££erson Co. Schools
XX Fire District (Wheat Ri$ge Jefferson Co. Commissioners
Adjacent City ( ) Denver Water Board
XX Public Service Co. XX W R Post Office
XX US West Communications XX W R Police Dept.
State Land Use Commission XX W R Public Works Dept.
State Geological Survey W R Parks & Recreation Com.
Colorado Dept. o£ Transportation W R Forestry Div.
Colorado Div. of Wildlife XX W R Building Div.
TCI o£ Colorado <pc>referralform
~e ~r„„n,ir„v~~,
THE CO~OLIDATED MUTUAL WA~R COMPANY
12700 West 27th Avenue • P.O. Box 150068
LAKEWOOD, COLORADO 80215
Telephone 238-0451
March 22,
Ms. Meredith Reckert
Department of Planning
City of Wheat Ridge
P.O. Box 638
Wheat Ridge, Colorado
and Development
80034-063$
399~iTY nc V~I'~'' ^T R(I]GE
D (~ ~~ r~l ~~ ~
fs"~; R. 2 4 1~~34 ;
~i~~~U IJ '~,-~ _ ~
PIANNlNG & DEVELOE?MEN~_
Re: City of Wheat Ridge Case Number WZ-94-4, proposed approval of an
amendment to the Applewood Village Shopping Center Einal develop-
ment plan to allow the Z5,000 square foot expansion of the the
exist3ng Wal-Mart Store, 3600 Youngfield Street
Dear Ms. Reckert:
This will acknowledqe receipt of your correspondence dated March
11, 1994 regarding the above referenced,.project:
Please be advised that the above referenced property is in an
area served by The Consolidated Mutual Water Company by virtue of a
Distributor's Contract with the Denver Water Board.
Our records indicate that the property ac3dressed as 3600
Younqfield Street is currently receiving -domestic water from the
Company through a 3-inch -meter (CMWCo Tap -I~Ttimber 13419/Accaunt Number
B-5009901). Domestic water_.s_ervice may continue to be provided to this
property subject to compliance with the Company's rules, regulations
and requirements for such service as well as the water tap allocation
poZicies as established by the_Denver Water Board.
The Company requires that a new application for water service be
completed by the owner and returned to the Company at the time there is
a change in use. The Company considers a remodel or building addition
as a "change of use".
The Company's rules, regulations and requirements further
require that each separate structure be served by a separate tap and
meter, and in order to receive domestic water service, the property
must also front a Company main. If the future planne'd use of this
property is within any of the above categories, the owner, engineer or
architect should contact this office as soon as possible so that we may
determine what water system improvements will be needed to serve this
property.
~
Ms. Meredith Reckert
City of Wheat Ridge
March 22, 1994
Page 2
~
Fire protection requirements should be obtained from the Wheat
Ridge Fire Protection District and those requirements forwarded to this
office at the earliest possi.ble time.
If you have any questions or comments regarding this correspond-
ence, please contact this office.
Sincerely,
~ ~~~
Michael E. Queer_
Water Distribution Manager
MEQ:jl
cc: General Management Company, Applicant
Dave Roberts, Wheat Ridge Fire Protection District
Walter Welton, PLS/PE, CMWCo President
John Allen, CMWCo Junior Engineer
~
~
IU~~RT ~IDG~ ~I~~ ~ROj~C~I~~ ~IS~~IC~
P.O. Box S07
3880 Upham Street
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80034
(303) 424-7323
March 23, 1994
Meredith Rechert
City of Wheat Ridge
Department of Planning & Development
7500 W. 29 Ave.
Wheat Ridge
Co., 80033
RE: Case No. WZ-94-4
3600 Youngfield
General Management Company
Requested Action: Approval of an amendment to the Applewood Village
Shopping Center final development pZan.
Purpose: Z5,000 square foot expansion of existing Wal-mart Store.
Dear Meredith,
After a review of the proposec3 development plan for Wa1-mart,
there are no current objections at this ti.me. If the proposal is
approved, plans must be submitted for approval prior to
construction including the required upgrade of the existing fire
safety systems currently in place. There may be unforeseen items
and or issues not addressed by this agency at this time. Additional
items and or issues will be addressed as the need arises.
cc:file
R~. espeCtfu~
~.s G
Dave Roberts
Fire Marshal
Wheat Ridge Fire
Protection District
oF WHeAT ~ MEMORANDUM i
~'' ~'o
~~ m
~ Approved Date ~
`~LORA~O - -
TO: Meredith Reckert, Planner
FROM: Greg Knudson, Development Review Engineer~ ~,
DATE: March 28, 1994
SUBJECT: WZ-94-4/3600 Youngfield Street - General Management Co.
The Public Works Department has reviewed the site pian for the above referenced project and has the
following comments:
1. We will need a revised drainage report which reflects the changes caused by the proposed
expansion. The residences to the east of the Walmart store is experiencing a drainage problem.
The residences are receiving storm runoff from the Walmart store in a undetained manner.
2. We will need a plan for the proposed West 38th Avenue improvements. Handicap access shall
be included for the public street frontages, the proposed driveway on 38th Avenue and the
sidewalk connecting 38th Avenue and the building.
3. The Engineering Division strongly suggests the use of a perimeter drive. Carrying primary thru
traffic at the store fronts creates conflict because emphasis is place on pedestrians. This creates
driver frustration which causes drivers to seek their own way around the conflict (cut thru at
their own discretion).
4. The proposed landscape in the pazking curb islands in front of the building might creates sighting
problem for pedestrians and the traffic.
S. Currently, our right-of-way map indicates the right-of-way on 38th Avenue frontage is
questionable ( uncleaz title). We need the developer/property owner to quit claim the 30 feet
from the centerline of right-of-way on 38th Avenue to their property.
cc: Steve Nguyen, Civil Engineer
+~'A; f ~r s',sieRT Rpla~~
~ ~ . ~~~~~
i~';:~:~ ,, n ~:j~~~
__~ l~J I~ U ll L'_7 ~
P1ANNfNG & DE'dcLiFe:trifT
•
~ Public Service°
March 23, 1994
The City of Wheat Ridge
7500 West 29th Avenue
P.O. BoX 638
Wheat Ridge, CO 80034-0638
Gi l ~ ItC i' - ~;nnr
p Ui
a~tlL~~: e'.~.,. ,. _ .. ~~; t i~~t4~
.ni' `t t`~ril~ LU R ~j . y~ ~
i
PublicService
Company of Colorado
2701 W.7th Avenue
Denver, CO 80204-4774
Public Service Company acknowledges receipt of the preliminary plot
plan of
3600 Younafield #WZ-94-4
Project Title
We have examined the proposed plot plan of the above-captioned
project and suggest that de£ining easements for electric and gas
service should be delayed at this time.
Easements cannot be adequately delineated at this time due to the
uncertainty of the service needs and locations to allow for the
most desirable and economic system design.
Easements shall be granted to Public Service Company when service
locations are made known for the construction, operation,
maintenance, and replacements of their facilities as may be
necessary to provide service within this subdivision or property
contiguous thereto, through, over, across, and under streets,
utility easements, and other public places or common areas.
Approval of electric and/or gas service to this property is subject
to Public Service Company of Colorado rules, regulations and
tariffs on file and in effect with the State Public Util.ities
Commission, State of Colorado.
If you have any questions regarding the above subject matter,
please contact Terasa Wilson at 571-3735.
'~ ~~
R. J:'Selecky ~
Electric Distribution Engineering Manager
RJB/lm
3
~
7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE
P.O. BQX 638
WHEAT RIDGE. CO 80034-0638
City Admin. Fax # 234-5924
March 11, 1994
(303)234-5900
Police Dept. Fax # 235-2949
~
The City of
~Wheat
~Ridge
The Wheat Ridge Department of Community Development has received a request
£or approval of an amPnc7ment to a Planned Commercial Development
fi„al rlo~~a~n~mant nlan ' " - _
~ ' at the property described below.
Your response to the £o].lowing questions and any,comments,on this proposal
would be appreciated by nnar,;h ~r,~ 1q94_ NO response from you by this
date will constitute no ob~ections or concerns regarding this proposal.
CASE N0: WZ-94-4
LOCATION: 3600 Youngfield/General Management Company
REQUESTED ACTION: Approval of an amendment to the Applewood Village
Shopping Center final development plan
PURPOSE: 25~000 square foot expansion_o£ existinq Wal-Mart Store
APPROXIMATE AREA: 11.02 acres
1. Are pubiic facil3ties or services provided by your agency adequate to
serve this development?
YES~~ NO . If "NO", please explain below.
2. Are servi ce lines available to the development?
YES ~ NO , If "NO", please explain below.
3. Do you have adequate capacities to service the development?
YE5 // NO . if "NO", please explain below.
~. Can and will your agency service this proposed development sub~ect to
your ru s and regulations?
YES NO . I£ "NO", please explain below.
5. Are there any concerns or problems your agency has identified which
would or should affect approval of this request? ~i/O
//
Please reply
DISTAIBUTSON:
~ Water District (Consolidalted Mutual
XX Sanitation District (Westridg~
Xg Fire District (Wheat Riage
Ad~acent City ( )
XX Public Service Co.
XX US West Commun3cations
State Land Use Commission
State Geological Survey
Colorado Dept. of Transportation
Colorado Div. of Wildlife
TCI of Colorado
'tOl~~~~~~~"`" _ ~~;~il"~ , T„T RPrlrPrj- _
Department o£ Planning & Development
Jefferson Co. Health Dept.
Jefferson Co. Schools
Jefferson Co. Commissioners
Denver Water Board
XX W R Post O£fice
XX W R Police Dept.
XX W R Public Works Dept.
W R Parks & Recreation Com.
W R Forestry Div.
-~X W R Building Div.
<pc>referralform
r~ ,<,,,,,r~ir,,,,..,
~
7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE
P.O. BOX 638
WHEAT RIDGE. CO 80034-0638
(303) 234-5900
City Admin. Fax # 234~5924
March 11, 1994
Police Dept. Fax # 235-2949
~
The City of
~Wheat
~Ridge
The Wheat Ridge Department of Community Development has received a requast
£or aooroval of an amendment to a Planned Commercial Develooment
finol Ac~IOlrlr+mGnt rll~n .
- - at the property described below.
Your response to the following questions and any comments on this proposai
wou].d be appreciated by ~,a,-,.h ~ti _ i aaa . No response from you by this
date wi11 constitute no ob~ections or concerns regarding this proposal<
CASE NO: WZ-94-4
LOCATION: 3600 Youngfield/General Manaqement Company
REQUESTED ACTION: Approval of an amendment to the Applewood Village
Shoppinq Center final development plan
PURPOSE: 25,000 square foot expansion of existing Wal-Mart Store
APPROXIMATE AREA: 11.02 acres •
].. Are pubiic facilities or services provided by your agency adequate to
serve this development?
YES x NO . If "NO", piease explain below,
2. Are service lines available to the development? gi~RVticE 41~VG
~~ n
YES NO . if NO , please explain below.
R~.+oCATW/.1~CoIJST(Z~GT~ON bwrd~R,. Q~5-~on~S,b«.t'r`( AT Cc~l.1 COST.
3. Do you have adequate capacities to service the development?
YES ~( 210 . Yf "NO", please explain below.
4. Can and wiil your agency service this proposed development sub~ect to
your zules and regulations?
YES ~( NO . If "NO", please explain below.
5. Are there any concerns oYr problems your agency has identified which
would or should affect approval of this request?
Please reply to~~G~L~ /~~~`-'~ M FA-kP+-t
Department of Planning & Development
DISTRIBUTION:
XX Water District (Consolidalted Mutual
XX Sanitation District (Westridgel
XX Fire District (Wheat Ri$ge
Adjacent City ( )
XX Pubiic Service Co. XX
XX US West Communications XX
State Land Use Commission XX
State Geological Survey
Colorado Dept. of Transportation
Colorado Div. of Wildlife XX
TCI of Colorado
~a ,e.~,~.~rr .,:,.
Jefferson Co. Health Dept.
Jefferson Co. Schools
Jefferson Co. Commissioners
Denver Water Board
W R Post Office
W R Police Dept.
W R Public Works Dept.
W R Parks & Recreation Com.
W R Forestry Div.
W R Suilding D=a.
<pc>re£erral€orm
~
~
.
VJ
~
~"
L
~
~
Q~
~
~
~ ~
~i
~
7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE
P.O. BOX 638
WHEAT RIDGE. CO 80034-0638
City Admin. Fax # 234-5924
March 11, 1994
(303) 234-5900
Police Dept. Fax # 235-2949
~
The City of
~Wheat
~Ridge
The Wheat Ridge Department of Community Development has received a request
for aoproval of an amendment to a Planned Commercial Development
~ final Acvalnnman+ ~1~an '
at the property described below.
Your response to the £ollowing questions and any comments on this proposal
would be appreciated by _Ma,-,;h ~ti_ iAqa No response from you by this
date will constitute no ob~ections or concerns regarding this proposal.
CASE NO: WZ-94-4
LOCATION: 3600 Youngfield/General Management Company
REQUESTED ACTION: Approval of an amendment to the Applewood Village
Shopping Center tinal development plan
PURPOSE: 25,000 square foot expansion of existing Wal-Mart Store
APPROXIMATE AREA: 11.02 acres
1. Are public £acilities or seroices provided by your agency adequate to
serve is development?
YES ~ NO I£ "NO", please explain below.
2. Are serviae lines available to the development?
YES NO . I£ "NO", please explain below.
3. Do you }iave adequate capacit3es to service the development?
YES / NO . If "NO", please explain below.
4. Can and will your agency service this proposed development sub~ect to
your~r}~~es and regulations?
YES v NO . I£ "NO", please explain below.
5. Are there any concerns or problems your agency has identified which
would or should affect approval of this request? ~p (
Piease reply to• /,q~/ CC~~c,~G'l~ l~~L~-~~ M Rarkarj-
~ Department of Planning & Development
DISTRIBUTIOI3:
XX Water District (Consolidalted Mutual
XX Sanitation District (Westridg~
XX Fire District (Wneat Ri@ge
Adjacent City ( )
XX Public Service Co.
XX US West Communications
State Land L3se Commission
State Geological Survey
Colorado Dept. of Transportation
Colorado Div. of Wildlife
TCI of Colorado
Je£ferson Co. Health Dept.
Je£feison Co. Schools
Je£ferson Co. Commissioners
Denver Water Board
XX W R Post Office
-~ W R Police Dept.
X~ W R Public Works Dept.
W R Parks & Recreation Com.
W R Forestry Div.
XX W R Building Div.
<pc>referralform
c, ~~,~.,~~,~.~r~,,,.,,
~
March 29, 1994
Dear Area Resident:
~
An application has been submitted to the City o£ Wheat Ridge for
approval of a 25,000 square foot addition to the Wal-Mart Store
within the Applewood Village Shopping Center at West 3$th Avenue
and Young£ield.
To solicit input regarding the proposal from the surrounding
neighborhoods, the City has scheduled a neighborhood meeting on
Tuesday, April 5, 1994 at 7:00 p.m. The meeting wi11 be held at
Ridgeview Baptist Church, located at 3810 Youngfield Street.
Representatives £rom the Planning and Development Department, the
Public Works Department and the City Administrator's office will
attend the meeting to e£fectively respond to any questions you
might have. Representatives from the Applewood Village Shopping
Center will al.so be in attendance.
Plans o£ the proposed addition will be available for review at
the meeting. The plans are also available for review at the
Planning and Development Department on the seoond £loor o£ City
Hall, 7500 West 29th Avenue.
I£ you have questions about the meeting or the proposed
expansion, do not hesitate to contact me at 235-2848.
Sincerely,
Meredith Reckert
Planner
MR:slw
.
~
~
_ ! <S~~~n/- t~ ~ _ ~S',~f~- ~ __-_ `~- s - 9 ~
~
~
__._:~_ -----_. ._~____.___~___ _.___..____. __w_._.____._ _~_____.__~..__.__~______
___ `~' __~%~tir~ ~ _ ___~_ _._ ~?~~~ss - --
~~ ~ , ~ .
_ _ _ ._, ~ ~ /I~cl~Il ~z - --- -~~ ~1 _G~d~~~,/~7- <ST -
--~~2~~ r~ .7`~ ~"~ ~ 80 ~. ~ /~ ~'
, ~ ~, ,~-~~~ ~~ ~!~ ~ ~
~ ~,~v ~ i ~-;K.~ -_ _.._.
_ __..._.., _ - _ __. __... _ . __ _
~...'~'k~ ~t~ 7!l~fJC~f~~ 3801 ~~ ~~; CZ',
~o ~,~ ~'~ c~ ~ ~a_~a ~ ~ 3 ~ ,9~~
;,~,~~ [ s ~ u~/J~C-PS - --- ~~Co _ c~v~~`~QJ~P- ~ ~ C_-- ----
~ ~~
_ ,; - L°'~r _ _ ___ _ 3 ~'Y~ ~' ~~~-~ __ --
;
--_~___~ __ - _____. -._._.._ ____ _ ___ _... _ .._ _. _ . - -- __. __._ _____. _---..,~~._
~
_ _ . ___._.____..________ _.. _._.__.__._..._.____ _._-- --_ ._ ---__.___.__
-~ ----- _ . _ _. _ _ ___________ _ ___. .._. ._._ _ . ...
. _._~..
___ _ .. ~ _ _ .. _ _... __ .. _..~.~..
~., ___ _.. -- . . --__ __ __- -_ ._ ___ _. . _ _.__.
_.,
~~ __~. _. -- -- _
_ _ _ .._ . _ _ __ _ _- __ . _.__.._ _. ~ _.
;
~
r~
~~
~~ ~~
l~ '
~ 2 ,;
.
- ,~- ~~/
.
w~~ ~ ~~~
~ ,. __ --
~
. ~
/~,' ~
.~~.u..~ ~~ ~~'~~ - - _- ,
~~ ~
°, ~~
~
--~, ~~~ ----__ -_ ___ _ __
_ ~ . _ __ --- _. ___ _ _
,'I ~ -
i; ~ ~-~~~~-~ __ _r.._-~__ ~ ;~~.~ ~~~r-~-
u~ ,
~, ~~~-C-~'~- '~.,a ~-- .,
;~ ~ ,~-r`''~___.__-_ ~ -
~ _ . _
,~
', " ~, _
oz~. ~ ~~_ ~--
~ _._ -__ _ -~-~.
--- -
. ~_ __~ __.__ - ~ ~~'_ ~ ~-~
, . y~-
~ _ ~0 ~'v~c.-vt. -~ ,.~~~ 0~~~- ~-
a~.o-cr-4-~
- ~ ~ ~ - - J~" ~ ~.'2''~c~C~-~~ - -
' ; I ~~'Y~~ -c-~e~.~ _ ~-~-~c.~~~a'v`-~ _ ~U'`~'~'
'' ~~~~ ~ ~-~
- --___..._ __ ___ __ __ _ __ _---. - -
. _
`, ~~ ~~
.
~ _---="~~z~~ ~ ~_~2e. . -
~ ~' !/~ -~--/~-~-. ~+:22~X~~ ~fiw- ~~'~-- .~~H. ..~~i£~t..,ef~L.i --
~, ~
--;1 ~~~9~'-~l~~c.~. - - _ - _ ._ 6~'t~t-
~ _ __
---~~ ~ - ~ ~ --G'2~`~._-~' -
ii __-.__ /1 _ _ ._ _ . _ _ _.C:li~/~v`~ ~ rt~ - ` _ -°
..,
.. ~. _ ~- --- - - -- - --
~~~~-~~- ~-~ ~ ~ ~ p~~~r°~__~~u ~ ~_
,' ,~~- -:~~-~~ -~-~ -z-f ~ ~ -
.
~---~ - - ------___.__...._
, _..
~~-~-~-- ~.~-~ ~~~- /.z - -~
' ~~.
- -- - - - - - a - ----- -
~ ~
__ ~__._ _- -- - - -- - _. __._. _ _.. .
- - --- ~ __ _~_. _.
-~o ~/~~ U .A.~Q ~_ GL~--
v ~. ~.__ ~_~___ _ _ _._ _~_. ____. . _. _ ._ _ .~ _ __ -- __
,. ----- - ~ ~. ~ ~C~~i~~ ~
~
- .. . . - - -- --__.. ._._.. . . _ . ., . _ ~. .__. . _ . . _..
-
-~ ~~~L _ e
,~~ . ~!'(~~ -
--- _. CJ
o_ ,
G~ ~~G.c~-c~G~
~ ~-~ ....... ..- _._ . .... __ . .---.-.- _._~
_ ___.. __- -------- ~.~ .
/~U__~~ _- >~??~-~ ~-U"t~r~~ ~/i~
--. .
- -T - - ----c~~~~~e-m ,~ -~ TG ~ C 7'z~
' - - -~ - l ---`i_`Z' - ~ ___ -~ . ,.~/~^~-- - < i
, ~~o ~ ~_-~/1~--~--~~, , +
. - ---
~ ' `~
! ~ . _ .._.
~ ~~~ ~
__
~-=--- ---
,
/J --- _ __ /~
,, l/'~ ~vw°__. n ~ ~ iCi'~~`„'~~_ " .__ .. _' _ " _'
~ J
/~ /
~ iq p ~ 4J rsi~p.~y
~.~ ..`~ .. - .."~4`\a_ _ _._.._.. '__ _ '_ ' ' " '
~~(. ~ l/ ,.~i~ ~/ ~~z~%~-~-~ . _
~"~. / ~ '~ 9- _ .
~ ' ~ ' ~~ .. . . . . ... _ ___.__
. _ _ __ __ ~ /~~
._~......_ _ ....__ . '. // ... ,...._.__.. 1) /_f_ __...
~ ~''!(~'~rt!~~~~ ~/~y'1A'~ ~ ~i~~A~ ~~ .'/M1~/Ii~' \. If ~' " ~~
Y ~ .... _ ... . __ , . .
' _ _. _ _ __ _. __. _ '".__.___._..
I t
~ - - ~~ - ~ `" __-____ - _ . . .
- - --_ _
.~ `~2~ ti's~Z,~- ~~it~`-~ .
~~-
~-- ,~t- _ .
,-
- ~`- ~
7500 W~ST 29TN AVENUE
P.O. BOX 638 ~
WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80034~0638
City Admin. Fax # 234-5924
April 11, 1994
(303) 234~5900
Police Dept. Fax # 235-2949
Mr. Jerry Biehl, President
General Management Company, Inc.
13900 East Harvard Avenue, Suite 190
Aurora CO 80014
~
The City of
~VVheat
~Ridge
RP: Annlewood Shonnina Center - Wal-Mart Exnansion
Dear Jerry:
APter reviewing your site plan submittal for the Wal-Mart
expansion, hearing from the neighbors, and receiving input £rom
the Public Works Department, we have the following comments and
recommendations that wiil be incorporated into a staff report for
the Planning Commission public hearing on April 21. The comments
and recommendations are divided into three parts:
A. Those issues that directly relate to this proposed
expansion which we expect and recommend are accomplished by
you and/or Wal-Mart;
B. Recommendations that relate to the shopping center as a whole
and some off-site impacts and issues that we expect and
recommend are accomplished by you as owner of the shopping
center at some time in the near future; and
C. Those issues and concerns which the City, through the
Capital Improvement Program, should aocomplish at some time
in the near future.
A. PLAN SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Regarding the "Garden Center"
a. In addition to the iron fencing shown, some
additional view-obscuring screening should be used
along the north and east sides.
b. Lighting should be designed so as to pr,ohibit direct
glare and/or excess light bleed onto the properties
to the north and east.
c. No outside loudspeakers or audio broadcast systems
shall be used.
2. Regarding the building addition and exterior renovation,
staf£ recommends that the architectural treatment,
including color and use o£ gable facades match that o£
the building which extend to the south.
3. The proposed freestanding sign be revised to include the
Applewood Shopping Center design element used on other
signs in the Center.
4. Regarding parking lot and street access and street
improvement issues:
C~ r,,,,,,, n~~,;,,
~~/
.. fi ~ ~
Mr. Jerry Biehl, President Page 2
April 11, 1994
a. Extension of a sidewalk along West 38th Avenue to
the east will be required.
b. It is recommended that an additional main drive be
provided toward the western side. You currently
have a drive going south from the westerly curb cut.
That drive could be curved to align with the drive
behind Blockbuster, or it could remain as is. The
City would re-stripe West 38th Avenue to accommodate
a west-bound left turn lane into the shopping
center.
Additionally, we recommend that all parking ends be
landscaped and that the transition of the building
front drive at the south end of Wal-Mart be improved
in design.
B. LARC,ER SHOpPJNG CENTER ISSUES
1. There are existing (historic drainage problems that the
shopping center has caused £or the surrounding
residential areas. We recommend that you and the City
work together to correct those drainage problems. Those
facil3ties that would be located on your property would
be your ~inancial responsibiiity, whereas those beyond
your boundaries would be the City's responsibility. Your
costs could be partially recovered through the ESTIP
program. Timing of your drainage improvements should
correspond to the City's pro~ect.
2. Vehicular circulation coming £rom the south (West 32nd
Avenue) is very poorly designed. We have received many
complaints from citizens and elected officials. I have
sketched a possible solution (see attached) that would
provide more structured channelization. This would be
eligible for partial repayment through the ESTIP program.
C. r'rmy TSSUF.S
1. The neighbors to the north have requested a sound wall
and cZOSUre of Wright Court. We will approach Council
for approval and funding of this project.
2. There needs to be a le£t turn-in lane (west bound) at
your easterly curb cut. The City will re-strip West 38th
Avenue.
3. The City may eliminate the free right turn at the
intersection of Youngfield and West 38th Avenue; thus
increasing the corner land area for landscape
improvements. This con£iguration contributes to the
confusion at this intersection.
4 ~ ~
Mr. Jerry Biehl, President
April 11, 1994
Page 3
4. O£f-site drainage needs to be properly collected and
conveyed via a storm sewer system. Those portions of the
system that are beyond your boundaries will be
recommended to City Council for Capital Improvement
Program.
A meeting has been scheduled at 10:30 a.m., Tuesday, April 12th
with Public Works Department to discuss these issues and £inalize
staf£ position. It would be very help£ul if you could attend.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me.
Sin rely,
Glen Gidley, Director
Planning & Development
GEG:slw
attachment
etV tMCI. irE OCSCAIfL10~ O~ iNC COMIAOI ~~Mti Yf£0 /M TNIS MlAVCf AaC fMw
~Il01eKi~ CIXKAEfC lIAIWM1C 04 IM_~CAPIHL• li lAVf~ q1~t~ LMIMICLroFiION 6I TXIf {UIYCY.
1. [wu[ii L. 4A11[. OG M«[~x I~At! i1Ni iNC iVlfKr Of iK oCfcal~~ iMCT Wf ~MDQ UMJLa 1fY'4l~il~ltlti
Sµ1T SUrERVIiiOM IHO <K<KIMG. AMO. TO iF1E ~CST 0~ MY ~+pN,[DGC. ~H T~~ ~~ELllf~ IM KCWWHC! YITM /~l.t
AT~ON D~SiA~Ci, M~LICMIC COLORMOO STANTLS~ ~URACXT 4FVIffD CO~T~ON~ f0 Af ~T ~aTK ~K <«~'E ~~' '~'RT~CtC fl•
'~ O(STRICT SCQ~ON 10}. TNE IOItO+(ING CpWfMTS lEUtlxG TO ~'AR f6aCNTf All[ K4C~T wMC A ~~f oI TMIf
VAtEA DISIrt(p0. CE~~~riG~ti~oa.
E.~rr ~. ~µe `~'~T L. ~
IeNE lM41MCfAI1K S[IIVILf~ IMC. ~` ~ ~
1500 v[Si I~TX AYfWf y (u` ~
IAKCW00~ C0~04M0 ~Of15 E D
iElCPrqnE US-40Yi COtORApp MJqfR V ~ 438
~ 9a~'ho ..,~C- ~
~ HEI ~%ISTNb~R`.h1~~ YD ill`. N~IINE ~f TtNE bEN4FJl ~4A~K
BQ4RD E.ASEMtNi. ~CEfLACF R~`+~~ a~-` ~REES W~LICE NO
TREEh E%~ST. _ , ~
162.99~ ~~"~K
~
~.i...ii
,, , .
/,;; ,
. /..
.y e t1'
/ ~' ~+~~~
jiJ^ J.
// ,~R /" t~
i ~ ~-
~
/ ~ `~
'~~,.~
~i
. .~...,,,... - - ~ -- ~
- _ - °'a~ _ - ~
,~~~~ c. .~TRK. C.P~SL°MENT y` PTOPQSED W.M(TLW~~
~ '°~°~•r~--~1'""-" ~lbB Py'C C yB4 "\.\ No CMV[
~~ ~ri
` , ~..J\ -~-- ~
i nIEW ENC~OSED DOCK 4'$Y I
I (AMENDUENT'3) ~~ ~pJ;~ h
r ti
i ~_: ;,,~~;: V U ~ J
£
~1 ~ ~~~£ iI~ ~
~ 2 ~Y •
-~h5 1 'K~14fi 5001'ER5 ~.. ' 11r1~(jn ~ ~ ~
i
NEW GANOPtYS '" ` ~~[1 ~
~ (AMENDM[~It 3) .., . ~- ~ ~FN I
1
~ O
/~~'~ ~ ~. ..
r~t-) ,' rs._[ J i i ~
~~ // i
~. ~ ~~. ~~j i
o ~ ; ~ ~,'~ ~ ~ ~.~
~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ , ,. ,
~
0
~~ ~-P
~ '
.~T ~ °~
• ~, ~
i ~ ii
,J ~ I ~"TI .
I
\III
I ~I! I
~ ~
i I ~ /~ ,
•
„
i ~~ ~~~
~.; /.
~ j. ...-~.r r^9
~~ KTAIL
. ~ % ~?," !/ in„ ~~"
'/ M ~
~
_ "'~" "f,. . r m
.~ . ~
~ ' i; Y
~ ~
~.~
/"
~~ ~ j
~
r a
--- -'
WC ~ IK !<.4L Y! 1~ ru~Y• (XC ~p(~I40f
n[nR.4rtA~lOM 0f MIA ~q~(
l. Wa[ 1 A1 M~ IM MC~IDlf ~p~~~~{.![.:t
w~ie LotaY1W a R! WOCtf~1~pM1l3~ ~
-.~u.rs er w:~xe+tea ro use ar ~,Y,u;~p~
5 ~OC%l WiC4G~MIMC DI[tS1~UTIpNS /,~q f~,Yl
GCHlI4llT WL1q1l1.
~... . New Co~vcrz~re ('~,~,~
` NF~ ~tdDScAP(Nb
S'EI.EL. EA~ME.l~[T '
OdC Ib°~ G o6o
PP6 io'TLlEP1~Y~CiEEAYJJ~GI~
r
/ /.t7?r7;h~~7G~% )
~
~IU~o~y TlC' ~1W_l~L `JII'F
/H/~j ~
1~' 'i
`~.4~ ~
~~' ~
~
I
~~~ ~~ .
~ ~
' cc«c
Rec wv
i
e
si a.•~ 3: ., .
.
.
~
~
~z~
fu I
~Y~'•.
{6 3 r
~~~ PROPCt>2D f.ESTAlN4.NT
C~ ADDfT10N . r-
y
„o..~. a~oaw~a
~'____'"'"'~..._"""'.."'. ;:
~ ~ '. I~WII R(L WLLL
I EYl ~ ~ 0 ~J~AI~I~
~~E_.~...yT l, . .~.r
~bSL Pni~ a61~~I~~ ~~~' r%' /~
L'Yf• r ^/;l'+r'~.f[i!':% ... ~ . ~'~l~31.'I
"'1
b
l~V~ 1S bcIS~4 ChMpNR #~#•3b .~', ~~'
~
ns rr~e x~
-s__''~^?2.` `Ra ~ .
-- -__._~~ - J-1--- , ~.-_ i5
~~. ... ~...~~ •
-'-7EA6[.MWT"5C4/_r.4~tri a~u ~'.
.~.} ~~-----1--
i
~
i
J.PPLEJAGK I FFCD
~. :IIqU~s ~ SGHHIp
i
• a~.a~. sr._; ~
~°~"q ~'~__-4-=.-'i ~l
FLT'~-
f8n
~- n~m epxr <---- 1 ~
~ i C3~c~.c - ~
~ wv+ oaT_ -> ~ O F ~
Y U
~ V'~ `- _ Q
1D' Y ~
`~/ BAMS Ci ARI2~.'q (~i X( MOEM~j ~ ~ ~,
~~
- ~~ ,~t K.
~-- , ~ '~ - _
,-~ 1 ~' ~ 3 s i
~ ~~
/ ;;
HK OF '
~ l a wooo ~ 3 m,t~
N ~~ ' ~tt~~7y~ Y ~+N ~'
~ ~...., 'M &iSEM~T~_ . ~,'~
_ ~ ~ ~ ^ IJ ./1J////%/ /ii/// /iii/iN~
~ ~
Evaluation of parking space requirements for
Applewood Village Shopping Center.
Site Development Statistios
Use
Restaurants
30 employees
Banks, Offices
Storage
Retail Sales
Gross Area Net Area
12,485
18,382
1,Q00
287,292
12,485
18,382
1,000
244,198
(Admendment #2,
last amendment)
Ratio Sgaces
1/150 83
1/15 20
1/300 61
1/500 2
1/200 1,220
Totals 319,159 276,065 1,386 (parking required)
1,482 (parking provided)
Site Development Statistics
(using current requirements and the addition of 20,000 sq.ft.)
Use Gross Area Net Area Ratio Spaces
Restaurants 12,485 7.0,612 1/75 141
Banks, Offices 19,382 16,474 1/200 82
Retail Sales 307,292 261,198 1/2Q0 1,305
Totals 339,159 288,284 1,528 (parking required)
1,382 (parking provided,
due to loss from
the addition)
Site Development Statistics
(using the "Unified Shopping Center" requirements and
the addition of 20,000 sq.ft.)
Use Gross Area Net Area Ratio Spaces
unifiea Shopping ~~`~ Z~3 ~7, d bs r l y8'
Center 3~ 288,285 1/250 ~Y53
Totals 334,159 288,284 ,~a o9 1,382 fparking provided,
due to loss from
the addition)
~.,"~ Y' P.0.80%b98 • :~ TELEPHONE:3~1@77•694a The Ci1y ~
_ " 7500 WEST 29TH AVFNUE . WtiEA7 RIOCE. COLORADO BOOJi c`JUheat
~Rlt~ge
POSTTNG CERTIFICATIDN
CASE N0. WZ-94-4
PLANNING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL - BOARD OF ADJllSTMENT (Circle One)
HEARING DATE: April 21, 1994
I~ Anna, pearson / General Mana~ement Company ~
~ ~ ( n a m e )
t"esiding at 734pp E Harvard, Suite 190, Aurora, CO 80014 ~
( a~d d r e s s)
as the applicant for Case No. WZ-94-4 , hereby certify
that I have posted the Notice of Public Hearing at
3600 Younefield Street, Wheat Ridge, CO
( 1 o e a t i o n}
on this 7th day of April
, 198~ 94 , and do
~
hereby certify that said sign has been posted and remained in place for
fifteen (15) days prior to and including the scheduled day of public
hearing of this case. The sign was posted in the position shown on the
map below.
S i g n a t u r e: l,fiG~LK.Pi~,L~ A.! ,g-~i--.~~
NOTE: This form must be submitted at the publie hearing on this case
and will be placed itt the applicant~s case file at the
Department of Community Develooment.
M A P
~ -.
~
' ~
~)
~
~
~f
~,m ,
~ ~ ~~
~
~~~
~
,
,
~
~
~
m m~aY~ A
~
; ~ GD(
,
:~
~,i ^
~~°~7 ~ 1
~ PC
.~
~,
i ~
R-
_ /
,,
yycsK
E
t~~
.G-!
~
I ~T
~ I- I
~
~
~-
, ~ ~ v_
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the
City of Wheat Ridge Planning Commission on April 21, 1994 at 7:30 p.m.
at 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. Aii interested
citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written
comments. The following petitions shall be heard;
1. ea~a Nn. zOA-94-~: A proposal to amend Wheat Ridge Code o£ Laws,
Chapter 26. Zoning Cocte relating to right of Zegal protest for
Special Use Permits and Day Care Centers as Special Uses within
residential and agricultural zone districts.
2. ~rz=44-4~ An application by General Management Company for
approval of an amendment to the Planned Commercial Development
final development plan £or the Applewood Village Shopping Center
located at approximately 3600 Youngfield Street. Said property
is legally described as £ollows:
PARCEL 1
A PORTION OF THE EAST ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION
29, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 654.32 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF
THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29, AND 60.00 FEET EAST OF
THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF
SAID SECTION 29; THENCE N 00~51.8' W PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF THE
EAST ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29, A
DISTANCE OF 667.82 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER
OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29, THEN N 89~28.1' E
ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST
ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29, A DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET; THENCE N
00~51.8' W PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST ONE-HALF OF THE
NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29, A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET;
THENCE S 89~28.1' W PARALLEL TO THE SdUTH LINE OF THE NOftTHEAST ONE-
QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29, A DISTANCE OF
150.00 FEET; THENCE N 00~51.8' W PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST
ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29, A DISTANCE
OF 135.19 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT
WHOSE RADIUS IS 182.00 FEET AND WHOSE CHORD BEARS N 37~51.1' E, A
DISTANCE OF 227.66 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE N 76~34.0` E
ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF WEST 38TH AVENUE, A DISTANCE OF 701.69
FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF RIDGEVI$W ACRES THIRD FILING, A
PLATTED SUBDIVISION IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF JEFFERSON COIINTY,
COLORADO; THENCE S 00~43.5' E ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID RIDGEVIEW
ACRES THIRD FILING, A DISTANCE OF 670.33 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE
NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29;
THENCE S 89~2$,1' W ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER
OF THE NORTHW$ST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29, A DISTANCE OF 0.67
FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS 885.00 FEET EAST OF THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST
ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29; THENCE S
00~51.$' E PARALLEL TO THE WEST'LTNE OF THE EAST ONE-HALF OF THE
NORTIiWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29, A DISTANCE OF 1162.99 FEET
~ ~
TO A POINT 160.00 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-
QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29; THENCE S 89~31.7' W PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH
LINE OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29, A DISTANCE OF
192.34 FEET; THENCE 500~51.8' E PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF `I`HE EAST
ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29, A DISTANCE
OF 130.00 FEET; THENCE S.89~31.7' W PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE
NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29, A DISTANCE OF 342,66 FEET TO
A POINT 350.00 FEET EAST OF THE W~ST LINE OF THE EAST ONE-HALF OF THE
NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29; THENCE N OQ~51.8' W PARALLEL
TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF
SAID SECTION 29, A DISTANCE OF 6Q0.00 FEET; THENCE S 89~31.7' W
PARALLEL TO TFIE SOUTH LINE OF THE NOEtTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID
SECTYON 29, A DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEE`P; THENCE N 00~51.8' W PARALLEL TO
THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF
SAID SECTION 29, A DISTANCE OF 24.32 FEET; THENCE $ 89~31.7' W
PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWE5T ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 29,
A DISTANCE OF 140.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING
AN AREA 29.969 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
ATTEST:
Wanda Sang, City Clerk
To be Published: April 5, 1994
Wheat Ridge Sentinel
Sandra Wiggins, Secretary
,.~..~
<pc>pnzoa943/wz944
~
T00 WEST 29TH AVENUE
P.O. BOX 638
WHEAT RIDGE. CO 60034-0638
City Admin. Fax ~ 234-5924
April 7, 1994
(303) 234-5900
Police Dept, Fax # 235~2949
The Crty of
GWheat
~Ridge
This is to inform you that Case No. wz-94-4 which is a
requast for anoroval o£ an am~ndm?nt ±~ +t,a z+nniPU,~n~ Gt,~nr,;,,~.
('on+cr final [i~Up~~[1mAr~+ Sl~.~
Por property located at q~(~(1 VnvinrtficlA S+roo+
will be heard by
the Wheat Ridge _~7 ann i nrt r~m,~,; ~~ ~9,., in the Council Chambers
o£ the Municipal Complex, 9500 West 29th Avenue at 7.~n ~m_ ,
on n~„-;, o, i oon ,
All owners and/or their legal counsel of the parcel under
considera~ion must be present at this hearing before the
1 annina CoI)1SiliSSion •
As an area resi@ent or interested party, you have the right to
attend this Pub.Iic Hearing and/or submit written comments. It
shall be the applicant's responsibility to notify any other
persons whose presence is desired at this meeting.
If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please
contact the Planning Division. Thank you.
PLANNING DIVISION
<pc>phnoticeform
.
~, ~:,~~„~...~~„~,"
. .n
Dear Adjacent Property Owner:
2£ you have received this notice, you reside
adjacent to a property involved in a land use
processed by the City o£ Wheat Ridge.
~
or own property
case being
This notice is intended to inform you of the process 3nvolved in
land use development applications.
Prior to application for rezoning or special use permit; the
developer is responsible £or holding an informal neighborhood
meeting. The purpose of the meeting is to provide the
opportunity for citizens to become aware of a proposed
development in their neighborhood and to allow the developer to
respond to citizen concerns in the design of their project. All
residents within 600 feet are required to be notified of the
meeting.
A sta££ planner will attend the meeting to discuss City policy
and regulations and the process involved, however, the planner
will remain impartial regarding viability of the project.
Keep in mind ~hat this is not a public hearing. Although a
synopsis of the meeting will be entered as te5timony, it is the
public hearings in £ront of Planning Commission and City Council
where decisions are rendered. If you want input in the decis3on-
making process, it is imperative ~hat you attend the public
hearings.
The public hearings you will be attending are quasi-judicial in
nature. Please do not contact your Planning Commissioners or
Council people to discuss the merits of a case prior to the
public hearing. It could jeopardize your representatives'
ability to hear the case.
If you are an ad~acent progerty, you may have the right to file a
"legal protest" against the application. The result of this
filing is that it requires a 3J4 majority of City Council to
approve a request.
If you have questions regarding any of the information given
above, do not hesitate to contact a planner at the City of£ices
by calling 235-2846. The Planning & Development Department is
open Monday through Friday 8:30 a.m. through 5:00 p.m.
<pc>adjpropowner
~,__,_ f,. .. -' ` d
r"~ -^-'' `~ ~I~ saNifRS. ~y~ ~C1t~rn 11~~ ~
°-^ 1 udja 2 tor atltl ~ thal ~ ~e `p P~f^ii.
_..._ --~' -~~ SENDEP: t1i!s ~'~ ~ 1
POSTMAVIK'.~ . comp~ceaercs3,~aean. reva~sem
~~....--- ~ ¢ ,~ ~ CanP~a ilerts ~d aGlress o" the ,~ a a~ ihe ba ~'~ rtu nqe~. to a~d /tre
~- -^" ' • Print YW~ na~ ~~ ~~px.. ~pw Ihe ~vered
_~ i
- ~ ..--- "` ~ ~ '~ ~ ~F~tach 9i~ tonn to t ~ ~ ~^ on U~s ~~IP ~Wre d lt~
L s 4
._--"~'~~_ PO5~AGE PESTRtGTEO 6 .~ :\~e R¢tU1nA6C~F6aW1 P~k1nYW
10~~~9^~,o.NO~ ~irv~re+ T~pen+maac~
RETURN po~~ss ~~nlaNa[cE~~T ¢ ',l data of delrve .a~~ to:
REGE4PT cEP~~osEE+aE
r~K~11GE TOULPOSTnCeN~F~vE~PAbNi
0
~'
r
r
~
A
~
~
~
a
.~
~
r
t'-
.Il
.n
m
~a
s
[L
gow ae°kgh.~ Street
3803 Wri4 ~p SOQ~3
wy,eat Ridg8
PS fOR~A 3800 f_,'~ ~'-`'"""_
~- e
~
-- ~--^ ~ ~ ~ ~
ppSTPGE ~~ ~~mED ',~.~
5V1tlN N4Y~iOM~Ay G
PEtt1PN nWr~SS~~ ~
I R~~IPT GErtW1EDGEE+nENPN~GEIPI
r~RVIGE TpTAlPO~TM~'EANOFEES Yl O..
~n~ MAII .~~
Glenn/Barbra Biilin9s
3435 Wrigh'~ Stree$pQ33
Wheat Ridge CO
r
c~
r
r
~
~
tT1
a
u'
~
P ~ M3V~~ ~~-"~,,.~,.
G
.~^^`~~~'-~
~-.r-~.°""~. / C
ppSTTGE ~~ 4 G
~~w+ro oFOEi~av~f
REiURN ApOPES~` q
RECE~7T GEµ~6~EDF[.E+RE~ANftEGE~PT
, SERUICE totA~eosTacEa~w~Es
. ._... c VE __...~ uAIOL _f
BoW Benkeht Street
3 s~rig gp033
~~~~~ Rid9e CO~
5.
s.
~ PSF
1"
q
'°y^
{O~~~W~~Jpdd2ssees Addres~
1. Dalivery
i 2 ^ Resiricted ,
».~Gter for f~..
cte Num~~ 6 6~
p qy3
~ CERTiF1ED
---
--~-Address !
Addressee s
(ONLY if re9~~d and 1ee Pe~-~ .
~ CERTIFIED
;e of Qe11~
_ (A9ent~ DOMEST{C RETURN REt,~~~ •
811,Novameer ~9so p-qy3 ~6~. `~6 " -~
~ __ ~ ~
-ees Aao~G~~ yid.) ~
Address uested and fee R
(pNLY if rs4
Glenn/$arbra B~llia~9s
3~g5 Wry9h6 SCO e8Q033
Wb~at R~~9
, . ~ /~, ~ ~~--
gn2ture " ~^"` .
en1)
6. Si9n21ure " lA9
,Novem~C i990
PS Form 3~11
12531~~ 35th Avenue
Wheat Rid3e CO 8Q033
v~ •IW"
~ GERT~F~ED
:e at Del[~verY
5 Atlqren~
Addressee ~d y~d fee p~~d~~
~QNLY it re4u~
C R gunt~-n A~enue sa'~gnalure"~_!`~'y 7VV °Li
w 35th /T~'K(
12531 Cp 80033 t~~~ ent) pOMESTiC RI
Whea'~ Rid5a e.signa~
3811,Nov~m~r 1990
PS Fo~ m _
RECEIPT FOR CERSIF-ED MAl
Pg FpRM 3800
w+n-~
P0.5TAGC ~"
RETURN SHOWSOVh10M.DATENbD RES1PlGTEO
' ~ DE
m' / ~
~
PECEIPT LN[
a~RESSOFOEUVEm
CEFIIFIEOFEE+qEIURNRELEIPT C
SERV{CE
~ I
TOTAL P~STAGE AND iEES
¢
~ no ixsoxnnce covexw~a vnmvm -
F JCNI IO. NOTFOP`HTEPNAl10NRLMAIL
e ~n~. uK~
rv
.n
'9 Tony Ficco
m 12425 W 38th Avenue
~ Wheat Ridge CO 80033
0.
, . ~. .--....,.-. ._....,~_^--._..__....~,
I PoSiaGE
~
f~ET~Jflf~ ~
flECEIPT ' S11fM'TOWHOM.DFTEMID/ pELR'~EF E~I ~ ~'
A~~SSOFDELNEqY
SERVICE I CEF~IFlEOPEE+RENHNqEGBPT I 4
i cQ li TOTALPOSTAGEqNOFEES
[L _
t a
NU IN~UHqry{~t 4UVGAIq(it PHOVIpEp -
SE~T TO
i~ : NOTFORMiE~NAT~NALMAR
N
~
~
M
a
a' '
a
Pasquale/JoAnne Fillipone
3733 Wright Street
Wheat Ridge CO 80033
PS FORM 3 800
~ . RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED
~ ~ ux~osnas
~ ..
~~1. ..
~..~. Po=_.RlS=mxE
t~aw.m. n~~
PosmGE < POS
REIURN SIIOWTOWHOM,OFTEPNO FE3TNIGTEO / ~{
Y ~ DEfIVERY
RECEIPT _
A~OqESSOFpEIJVEF
CERTIFlEOFEE+qETOPNRECE~PT ~
SERVICE
C~ TOTqLPOSTAGEANDFEES ¢
Q
SENT TO: NO INSIIIWNI:t 1:UVtNP4C YNUVIUeu ~~
N~ERNPI{ON0.LlMIL
~10TFOR
[~- ei
mx~c xmE,
P
37 ~3 Wright Street
Wh~~t Ridge CO 80033
~ . .. i
5. Signature - (Addressee) -
~C~ r~c~rn ~O ,~~~---c~9
S nature - (qqent) `~
PS Form 3811, November 1990
'l~ v.~..v v+vµ..avaa
12680 W 38th Avenue
Wheat Ridge CO 80033
N
~
„0 Jerry/Jane Gleason ,^I' ~I ~' !r
m ~ 126$0 W 38th AVeIIllO 5.Signature-(Ad~essee)
Q''~.. ' Wheat Ridge CO 80033 ~( ~~' ~
~- 6. S g a~e -(A~nf( ~
I (~
4a. Artcle Number
P 913 667 774 ~
4b. Service Type ,
~ CERTIFIED
7. Date of Delivery
~ ,-/! -~ ~,
8. Addkssees Address '
(ONLV if iequested and tee ,oaid.) ~'
DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT
_ ___-r~ ~er~-vo-.- .u,,.-~---
46. Service Type ~~
~ CERTIFIED
7. Date of Delivery
8. Addressee's Address
(ONLY if requested and fee paidl ~
DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT
4b. Service Type
' ~ CERTIFIED
~ 7. Date f Delive ~
~i~~-~~
8. Addressee's Address ~
$~~~~,~~` ~(ONLY i( requested and fee paidJ
f~~
PS FORM 3800 pS Form 3811, November 1990
RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED M
MS~iPLSFMICE ~f~ • ~
~
-__ , SENDEfl: .,.. ...._ .....,.._._ -T .. ~ ._. __ _. ~ ...e - ._., ...._-_ . _._ ._ ' ' _ ._' __
POSTMAAR ';~mvk~e aems i a~ia z m~ aaaa~o~ai serv~~es
h (
I also wish io receive the
Oomple~e i~ems 3, antl 4a 8 b.
• Print your name antl aWress on ths m~erse ot ihis iwm so ihat We can reWm Mis card 1
fO~~OW IOg S8NIG8$ (fOC a~ y%((a (P,e~: 1
' :°YO"
' Attach Ihis torm to ihe front of Ng mailpeCe, y~ un ~he bsck if space tlces ~qt permit
~ 1. ^ Addressee's Address ~
.
, ~ Wrile "Re~urn Recei~l Requested" on Ihe mailpe~ peloW ths azlicle number
he Retu~n fiecei~t Fae will P~vk~e yw ~he 5igngNre of ~he psrso~ tleliva2tl to arq Ihe
2. Q ReSfflCfEd ~E{IVery ~~
!~r" m~~~^~ -~ ConsWt postmaster for fee
'
3. Arlicte Atldvessetl to: .
~ Tony Ficco
12425 W 38th Avenue
Wheat Ridge CO 80033
, ~ .,.,.. , ,. ~
5. 5~' nat~ure - ( ressee)
__...~~ ~~~0~~~,~ ~ ~
POSl'MQ 6. Signature - (Agent) "
G~
~ PS Form 3811, November 7990
!
.~.-.~ .~., -~,.~..._._ _u ,_~. ~__ _
pa uale/JoAnne Filli one
w
DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT '
•
~4
-J_';
I also wish to reeeive the ~ee~. + i
.,..~--- ~ - - ~- ~ ,~ .'.- --- --^ "^- '~' ~ ~ ~,~r' sENOER: followir5 services (for an extra
+... f.-..- .^"^"_ ~..-'~.~-,-. ~ PQ$TM{lAA1 ~ ComPlete ilems 1 aritl/4s~ br atldil'wimi services. ~
.. ~ ._ .co,.n~e~eaemsa,e~ ~.^Addressee'sAddress
- pDSiACE , ~, . prin~ your narne and aMress on ihe reverse ot this fwm w lhal ire can refum ihis cartl
~~L~RV io ~ aces nat permit. 2~ ROStfiGted DeliV9ry
• A~tach thle form iro~d ot tl~e ~~ Ipace, °r on Ihe bsck it space
PETUflN 1 no9R sros oF OEi~AVauo aESre.~Eo , sted" a~ Ihe mailP!ece betow ihe article numbet. ,_
7 ~ • Write "RelU~n Rece n tlelrverad to and :he
FECEIPT ~E~~~O FEE+pETIFN PEGEIPT , • The ftetum Re~eqt Fee viA~ INovide yw ~hs v9"a~re o! Ihe Peso Consult postmaster tor fee.
sgawce - I `. ~~a ~e cr«~~~ 4a. Articie Number
p.., _ __ 1o.a.eosTn~EUUOFEES 3. Articte Addressedfo: !~
r _ m..,ry~OFQINTEP{aTOCN~ LMN4 ~- S- 913 h 6 7 7~ 9
rv SENT TO: ,
~ 4b. Service Type
r, Avis Goehl
~ „n 3623~tt'ight Street ~ CERTfFIED
' ~ 3623 WriSht Street Whea~...Ridge CO 80033 -
I~' m Wheat Ridge CO 80033 - -- "' - - 7. oa~ of oei~very -
`, '~ ~ 8. Addressee s Address ~
~ a - _ 5. Signature -(Addressee) ~ /~ (~r~y if requested arrd fee naid.l
n ~
PS FORM 3800 l also wish to raceive the ;
~~~or rnrs,C,EEt7]F1~J?~ sENOER: followlrty services (for an extra teel: d
~ ~~ .~,~;~_,,,~ ~ Cpmp~ete ilems t aM/a 21a adtlitional servicas.
e fOSTMhA Corm~e~e^e"~3•a'aaaen 1, ~ Addressee'sAddress ~
~~ACE . ~• PriN yoo~ nama arW address on tlre re~~se N ilrs twm so tha[ vre can retum this ca~tl 2~ ResKicted Delivery
FETURN ~ .MOW TO vMOM.0.4TE aN0! t~Li~VER~( ~ / ~ ~~ Atfacn Ihls iwm lo ihe tYOnf of the m9ilpiece, w on ih¢ back iF sPace tloes no~ permH. ~l1SU~f pO5If112S'~Ei fOi f00. , 1
nooaESS oF oeuvE~v . yy~ite "ReNm Receip[ Req~ested" on ihe'~ ~~~b~w ~~a~rsp~~~~v~~ed lo arA ~hz
R[CEIPT ~ • The Relw~ ~caipl Fee wilt praable Ya'
~mir~EOFEE+AE~uap~ECeror , ~fe~~~N~ qa.ArlicleNumber
~ sE~icE ° p 913 6 6 7 7 8 7
7~ i pa,r,~E quu FEes 3. Articte Addressed to:
C,- - n~in~uw.rv~~wv~w.~r..:o7~5-6- ' - _
~ SEN7 TO~ M~TFORMIEFNArO~~~~~~ _
~` Paul Goodrich 4b. Service Type
r- 3653 Wri9h~ 5treat ~ CERTIFIED
'~ Paul Goodriah Wheat Ridge CO 80033 _
.n '
m 3653 Wright StZ'20't 7. Date of Delivery
,a Wheat Ridge CO 80033 _ __ ~
Q- _ , _ _... _
f~ ~~ " ~ also wish to (eceive the
~' a ~~~ tollowing services {for an extra fee):
~~I 1 s~+oEa: Add2ss ~
comn~i~ ~~e""s ~ aridfu z tw wa~ro~ai s~~s. ~^ AddresseaS
!• Pnn{ ~ n~ ~~ ~R~ ~~~ ~~rse o~ ihis iorm so thal we ~n return th5 ca 2~ Restricted Delivery
I~ ~ : ~q~fete ilems 3.:u~Aba & b.
~ PS FORM 3800 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED M~ ~~'~a~n ~n~ tnnn+o u~e ~'°~ ~ Jhe m01~e, o~ on me ~~*'? ~~ dces ~~ ve+m'~ ~n~~t postmaster for iee.
I _-.--._--..-.-•-•---- ~~-r.-_~.--~_ ~~ T~he~ReNnrPCCO+P~F~ues~.~~~ hel ~ aWrea it~iever ondetrveredroaMthe
-~~~ ~~_ qa: Artic~e 913r 6 f~ 7 7 8 D
' acsince c POSTMhf ! ame.of~~~rv. F7 -
_ l. 3. pAicfe Addressetl [o:
~~~ fiETURN ~ Ao°~aFSmoFOENERYANOI ~LI~VEFJED~ / ~ • i
RECEIPT cE~Fi~o~E+aerunrvRECEiP* ~ ~ ~ prno].d Kuether 4b.ServiCelYPe
SEANCE ¢ 3s11 wxisn~ ~ouxt
Q SOTALPOuTPC.EPN~FEES a~~"3 ~ CERT1FfED
(~ rv01N~~OHIN'IEPNP OIWIMPII I ~~ ~yg.~ R1dCJ0 C~ -
r- SENT TO: A.» ~ ~ j,y _- -
- . 7. Date of Del~ 4~C ~ ~~
h . ~ ~~
~ i ,~o::r,~ i .
.0 ATnOId K~tO'eh'9~ '~ , ' f g. Addressee s Address
3811 Wright Court `~ (oNLY it requested and Iee pa~d1
a Wheat Ridge CO 80033 5J~ature-lAddressee) ~~ ~j_~ ~-
l~~` %, 4
d °~
~ ~ ' 6. Signature - lAgent)
~ ~
DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT ~;
~ fs
PS FORM 3800 pECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAI PS Form 3819, November tsso _
u ~.
i ~"~ ° E~ ~
~~
o'
jI Q
ti
I ~
( ~
1 ~
m
a
o^
a.
0
1~
[~-
n
_n
.n
m
N
0^
~
I aOSWGE I f-.~., ¢
RETl/RN ~ SHOWTOtM~OM,oATEAND RESTa~ciEo
RECEIPT I ADDPESSOFDEWERY I DELNEFY I ~ ¢
SERVICE I CEHIIFIEOFEE+(iENRNRECEIPT I g
I TOTALPoSTAGEANOiEES I C
NV IN~VMN{4t VOVEMGtYHUVIIIED~-
SENT TO: uorronwreaxnnoru~nwa
~•E aixrc <io~~
Ken Lewis
3840 Wright Street
Wheat Ridge CO 80033
PS FORM 3800^' ~ ^
I fQSfAGE I
PETURN s~iowi0vaioM,o.4~auo PESTHILTE~I
I
~
qECEiPT AO~FESSOFDEWEflV
CELNERY
G[HpFlEOFEHRETOFNRELEIPT I
SERVICE
TOTALPoSTAGEANDFEES I
SENT TO: NOIN]Y W1NL[ VUV[I414t YNV VIUtU ~
~ NOTPoPINIEPNATIONALMFIL
«~~. .~..~
~._.__.._~ _ _' - " _ .._ ___ -._ - . -,. _~ .~ , _ ,-..- _. .
~~ ~EljDER:
POSTMA h ~
~te11Pf1,s ~~~
z~
~~ .
~
~'
~
a
,
~~~i serv~~es.
~~ Complete ilems 3
and 4a & b I also wish to receive the
.
.
I• Prin~ your name antl etldress on ihe reeerse o~ ~his fwm so thet we can roWm Mis cartl
folbwirg services (for an extra fee): ;
:° Y01
I Attach ihls forcn ro ihe fmnt of ihe meilp"rece, or on Ihe back if space tloes rwt psrmit.
~• WAre "Retwn aecei~~t Requestetl" on ~he mailpiece bebw the article number.
• T 1. ^ Addressee's Address ;
2. ^ Re3t~iCted Delivery
i
he Relurn Receip~ Fee will provitle you Ihe sgne~ure of ihe pyrspn tlelivered fo aM the
aare oi dei~,~. ~
Consult postmaster for fee
3. qrticle ndaressed to: 4a. .
Article Number
Ken Lewis P 913 667 7p9
3840 Wright Street 4b. Service Type
Wheat Ridge CO 80033
=e
- i , "~' "~ - - - - -
- 5. Signature - (Addressee)
~ ^ POS r ~ ~nature -~~-~> ~
/ ¢ ~
6
c ~ PS Farm 3811, Novem6er 1990
1
„ Mike Lewis
~ 3812 Wright Court
Wheat Ridge CO 80033
Mike Lewis ~
3812 Wright Court
Wheat Ridge CO 80033
_._~_. .. . ~r_ , , --
_
PS FORM 3800
RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED N 5. Signature - (Addressee) •
/~
~
"°'~' °'~' ~" \
- ~--' - ~ _..__ , -
6.Signature-(qgenty ~
` I POSTAGE ~ POSTMI~
RETUflN ^
~ SHWl ID WHOM.OqTE ANO/ ~LI Elfl ED I / ~
RECEIPT ~ ADOfiESSOPOEWERV ~
S Form 3811
November 1990
~~~E ~ II CERTIFlEOFEE+qEIDqNFEGEiPT ~ ~ ,
m
p' I TOTALPOSTNGEANOFEES
- I 6 ~ ~ ~ '
~
N
SENT TO: ~ NOTFOR[FN ~FNAlIONqLMAIL f
"°'"s°'"„`r°°"E"""`PHOONeO- ~ary~ xatnteen
M1 , McCulloch
-n
`tl 3395 Wrogjt Street
Gary/Kathleen Wheat Ridge CO 80033
~ McCulloch
'y
~ 3395 Wrog~t Street ~ ~ f -
'~~
Wheat Ridge CO 80033 5. Signature - (Addressee)
2
• ~. ~ 6. Signature - (Agent)
PS FORM 3800 ~
RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED ~t ~
~! pS Form 3811~ November 7e9o
~~
N
Portw sE~E i
i' pq
,,
~ CERTIFIED
7. Date of Delivery
~ / ~' 9' ~L
8. Addressee's Address /
(ONLY i/ requested and fee paid.)
DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT
P `113 6b r rltr -
4b. Service Type
~ CERTIFIED
7. Date of Deliver
~~/~-~~
8. Addressee's Address I
(ONLY it iequestetl and fee paid)
DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT
4b. Service Type ~ ,,
~ CERTIFIED
7. Date of Delivery '~,
8. Addressee's Address
(ONLY if requested and fee paid) ~~
i
DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT I ~
*
~~-'"'--'.~. ..~ -~ -~ .__ " ~ ~ Ad
s -^^ ices. re m tn~s ca R ~ted De
e fee.
e -_" ~rw+ai ser+ ~ ja~i we ~" ~ noi ~mn. fo 2. ~ Postrti%~ter` for
`_^ 1ar,d7uRtw~ ~n!a°m' ~~5~1ft
i. SENOE~eAeMS Aa~b. ~~2~secd ~kii~un~b5*~ ydifk
°~ `- POSTMAflK
.r-- ~ a b . ca,ww~a~ 3• a"°aae~ess a~ ~, on ~ ~ ~~~n ~rv~ LO NUmtier ~ (1 ~
.- - ~^ • Cos*4 ea~d 2~W~' befw'~ ~ t1G1e ~ ~ ~
_ . _ --~. _„__ / ¢ r ~ tpp iro s~.. apmlhe ~u g~i'~Wte d tha P~9° n ~ ~I .
_ ,.r-- ~ ~ ~ Pdnt Yo" ~ '9]~
~ctEO ~
...~-.-~""~ epSmGe r~ ~ . Nk1~~m~qece!pF~~11P`°ah'~Y~
SFq'HT~YhiOM`~RANO/ oEV~nv ~ e.~yQe
l ~ ~ -fh~ FygU1R~
AENRN npoaESSOF p~pur.~~ ¢ 4d.SeN[C
~~FlCOFES* aa~ ot ee' pGdressed{° GERTIFIE
pEGE1PT _ ~. 3. Artic~ ~ D
oFEES ~ M3.ia.ez
SER~IGE SOTAL~~'Gq~ W A1tONP1-IIA~
~ NO~NOTFOPMtEPN , ~ C'ur.~jp~ gh~ gtrge~ .
o SENT To: 80033 ~. Date of ~eliverY h
~ Mi17.ex 3773.e gid9e CO ~ aress dl ,
a h~a ~ g. Add ssee t~ y~d fee 1~ '~~
t` CuY~~D~~~YYt St'~~0~0~33 W ~~~Y if recluas
s 3773 W R1d9e CO $ _,
WhggG . ~ ~r• ` ~deesse
¢' * ~.Sig atute t entl ppt,llE.S?IGRETURNREC~-~pj ,
.~-r1~,en ~.
d F~~o~^~^'~~ nature' tA9 ~.- --= "`_
r Gs~g ,,,~ ~-
' pg FORM 3~~ ~F..f.~.IPS- ~ PQSIMA~~ vember i990 _.... ~c~ uN m r "7 ? a$
~-----"" 11,~'!O ,_..: ....~ ,~. w+ 1~ ~,6
_,_,~-l" / ` a pgFocm3$ ,,,~~--= p 9
~ ~~~•---"~ ppSTAG£ ~~~ ` " , y
f c t
~i~w~ 4 ~,~'"''^
sr.ct++T~wH~i~p.iNl~ T' ` ..,-...-+..-~"'""~..
~yETIJRN pppRESS~ RNpECE~ ~' ~1
FEE+flEN ~ ~~ gerviceT P
~~ia7 cermFreo ~~c~~~~dressedt° ~ K,{ GERSIFIED
eor5~~ N'~.~chQ
~ gF3{VICE .mN-ooST^G~GdFEES porN~~i.Uri - ,.
m ~+o~~FOaiN~nrm+i Wil1iam~~ht ~o~o tg~033 S~
rv sENT To: ~~ y,~itahall 38p2 ~ R d4y 7 Da1e ot Dellv rY F7 _~ v
r Georg W~g& , pi{dress fe~' Paid.} ~
.n ~illiw~i9ht ~ourtS0033 ~~ S Addcesseesuested and
y 3802 Rid9g CO ~ON~y if ~eq
m Wheat '~
r~ lAdd2ss~0~ ~
~. ~.. 5 Signature ~
TURN REC~~P~
~ ~ ~~.s,,~ ~_/ ~•" , pOM~S'lIGR~ r - Y
~ PS FORM 3800 ~ :•--"k~°R'`~~~~- FUSSMABK'Y' S, -- u~y - t~ge
~ ~~~., -"' y, p -- `~ GERTIFIE~
Eo ~ ¢ Novembef 599 !
~
~.,+---""`"`.~ e°s'°GE ~ ous a+o j~ IL~`v mr a ~~ g~orm 3811' -,...~_y'°::.R.s.-
~"a'0 ssa~~'~' ~-/'~'~ ~ of DeliverY
t p~,tuaN ~ owE+o Eav aECe'vT c ~, P ..,...,...,. 7. Date .
~ FEE+{tENPN ' _ ~..~.-•. ~ .
, ~~ nECEwT cEanc~oT~E~o~ES .. `i~~,~~' ' Address
~av~cE ,o*n~~ v ,",°~.a~~ b 8. Addressees ed ~d fee Pa;'~
~oscoa~N~n~+^T'onn ~ y ~.~. (ONLY if teQUBSt
' m SENT T0:
T.. re - tA esseel
~ `~ y . 5. S'~9 ~
'g 3621 Wr~9h~ S CO e 80Q33 tag ESTIC RET~ ~y~
~~ ~ 00't R~dZJe 6. S'~9nature - entl pQM
Wh
'~ 811,November t390 ~
[5"' ' ~~ pS Form 3
+3- CER'fIFtE~ MA
380o RECEIPT F~R ~t ~
pS FORM w
~r~,E`
_ ~ ~.
.~- -'-- ,~1-.,.~~. °
~~ ..-- ' ., _ .. -' m~ card
~~• ""~ ~twnel %erv`~s. s So~m s~ tnai We ca~ talutn t cet ntt.
~~ + 9 tor add.. s ra
!s !~ ~ & POS1MPPi` SEft~PEplete~l~ 3aand~~y on the rev~~ °; ~ op ~ b~,k 4~rn~'~' ~ a~d th~
^""~ g•~M ~p,~[ N~ ~4 tl~e matk'~'~ uekN+ ~aj~ deF1ef68
~~ _...-. °"" ~--^'~`~ srnwTEO j ~ .Q1 t' ~~h ftewr Pec~~4ieR~.p ~ -,~ Y~*' ~'Hiulure d A
..~..~.,~-^ ` pp54AE ..unM.DRtm~~I OEL1`IE~ ~`~ • itke{i?~~~fl¢CO~.._ ,
gabe~~l~~r`d~ paee n~.
~
3g75 `~r1 a e S CO 80633
~hea~ gi 9 ,,~,
_, . ~
-~ GEF~I~tED
e of oe11~
~':' dress~ fee paia.)
addressees Ad
(ONLY ii requ~ted
,~....-. ,'~81~,..
_. ..~.---_. ~, ~.67' _-
TA~cYY ~1°.'~~,Aaemen~' `"~ h].90
PS FUn,"„'- ~
~
._--,--'"- ~
.,_,,.;.~..-^ p~ryGE
.-r^ "^'.` ~\ _....u io WHOD
fOlloWin~Se •,° tlCey~
pddressees
1. De1Wer1
~ ~ye~ricled er for t~e. I
~ 2' ..~~ nnS~Ii~~~ 1
nr~p 913 bb? 784
~=
~errY ~~MariaSe en e °#190
Au~p~ a CO v 80 1~`
1,N°~1~90
~h~a~ Rid58 /C~ J80033
~ AdUre~e ~ tee Paid.)
~~ddressee s
(ONLY if ~eqUested ~
addr~- gs ges Adtlres~d fee paid'1
taNLY ~t re~~2sted
aS FOkr+' „"_ _
FiEStIPN
pECE~PT
SEfNICE
~
r gL E ~
,,,_._ .--- -'~" .~ ^ ~' ~ ~ ^ tnk card
ce% ~ reium
~--- ^--"`- ~ '•-. la 2 foi adtlit'a~1 sern h~ ~fm so that v~
p9$'(M~ SENDER: ~e °t t ~,~ il sP~ ~9 not p~m~.
gtgde~~~ 4a&C. rse
F =~ s • C9PoP~e~cert~3~~addreasanihe 'd, onlM1~ 'd
a~~~
'.~ ~ ComP ~e a~d me I~'. « b¢pw tha ~~~ pg~'~~ed to
pasrneE , a ~' ~ niint Y~"r nen ~ imnt d t a ~~ ma~W~tura d tnel~' 4
SH6M1'TOWH~M.DAqYANPf ~h'EP~'/~ th's1o~InW tRe0.~5t07. tl~es'rdn2
a :~ i'AUacn Re~ witl IX~v~ `~
MppES50F~E1PtE PECEIP~ ' • Wiii¢ RW ~~Fee
GLirtIFlED~ 6 y '• Th° PR .
~~~~ d3k d5 deih'
~. 3. A[ticte Addressed i°- g~.0
TOTAL PQSTAGE A1~DGEFS 1 Y (~
~ µpTFORINTEHNA110NAlMPI . ~3T~g `.d~y'L~n3
~ h/3QSep ~ r~
.~.o Raiph/1oSephyn~ Santangelo
38p1 Wrigh~ Cour'~80033
a Wheat Ridge CO
~'
o_ ________--"
PS FORM 3soo RECEIPl' P~R CERT~F~ED MAI'
~w„~~ros . `
~su~
~y~~~N .
"q REGEIPT
y c~pV1GE
~~. r SEN'~
~
~
~-~~~ ~
~w'- e aesmw~eo j G
~T~~oEiNER~~f ~~~
RENRNAECEM'T ~
~,~(if1F~E0 ~E ~
.. sc'ocees ~' o--~
~ iOiPLPOSTA~.u ...nONAIi.U`N'
i~ son~iebei~.
Geo~geJMaht str~et
e
.n 337~' ~RidS CO 80033
Wheat
~ m
~ rfi
p a ~y__~
~ ,..--- ~ ~-- c F
~ pg F01~M 3~~''' J e
I ~,~_-~ TMaE pESTfNGTEO
~` ~~^ sHOwT~vA~oMi~mrnwo! net3~~`" c
~ ~NFN ao~~~ unECE~P~ ~
~ RECEIP` GEATIFlEDFEE*p`t~
$E{"NICE iOTN-PP~tAGE~ FEES PRON
NPIµ0iG0RINhftN~ONAIMPb- ^
' ~ SENT TO:
r
' ~ gl p~ Wr 9r'~ S Cp e 80033
-u , 38 e~~ gid9e
.'1 ~
I ~' ,
~, ~-
F ` P5 FORM 3800
Wh
3801 Wri.9ht CCO &Op33
Wheat Ria9g -
_ ' ~--
~ ,Py".....
811, Nov 1 ber 1990
~ ~~~
~ BSS~d t
Geor9~~MarY Styeet e14
33`~~ Wri~h~ ~Q 80033
Wh~a~ RiBgg
_ ~
_';~«.-, -,
~ " :.~ ~ ,
5` )S~~atU ~ ~pdeSces
6 S~~ature - IA9en~1
' PSForm3Qll'HOVember 1~~
~'~
t _-
- ~Addresse )
5 Sig ~ ~~ '
~ ~
g S~ nature - ~A~enH
3$11,Novemner t990
pS Form
~ CER~FiE~ , ~ I ' _' 4
REC~tPT FOR ,
folto; ~~ Add2~ee's Add~ess
2. ~] RestRCted OeGvery
~ _ m~<ter for 4eE
cie q~°3 ~~7 ~78
P =
~ GERTIF~E~
iateor~1'(~~~ ~~_
«~ ~
Addressees Address f~ ~~d.a
(ONLY if req~~esied Tnd
AriicleNumu°~ 7yy
p 913 66~
SeCViCe ~YF"'
~ CEFtTIFIED
~~
- of De~1~`T`,'1 ,,.
~. Date ~d X
addressee`s Address ~d.) ~
(ONLY if requ~red ~'d fee p
~ .,~r,~tn=u
add sre sees Aau~o~~~ d ~~ paid.!
tQN~y ii requ~ted an
Rl
I'~
N
M1
~
~
m
ra
~
~
qrr ~,
°°s'"`'E ^-
RETURN 1 I
^ ~
RECEIPT SH~T01W1fOM,0ATEqNO RESTPICTED'
/OOqESSOFDEWERY ~
pE~qy ~
SEFn/ICE CERIIFIEOFEE+qEiUqNqEGEIPT ~
I
~ I TOTALPq9TpGEqNDFEES '
SENT TO: "°' „o FO
'
q NTEqN TONqL MAIL U
err * .,~R~
i ,
,
PS FORM 3800
~
N
N
r
~
.e
m
~
^^
a
Q'
~
h
M1
~
~
m
~
Q^
t7..
RETURN 1
RECEIPT ~
SERVICE ,
SENT TO:
~
6 - P M »._._-:..,' -,--~.~ .__ -.,- --.. .. .,-... ..._ ..-. -'. _ " _...~ ... . .. I
a tiI~~ECo~iere nems i.~naio~ z ror aadaanei serv~~s. I also wish to receive the '~
N 1
•Campleteitems3,v~tl4a8b. fOIIOWI services foranextrafee
6 IC • Pnnt your name and address on fhe reverse o( ihis fo~m so Ihat we can retum ~iis card ~ ~ ~' i
:°}'01~ 7- ^ Add2ssee'sAddress
~" ' Al~xh ihis form to fhe hon[ oi 1he mailpiece, or on Ihe beck if spece tlces nol pe~mh.
~ • w~+te •aemm aeca~Pi a~~,ered° on me ma~i~e nebw tne am~ ~n~,. 2. ^ Restricted Delivery
• 1he Reiurn fiece~pt Fae will provxla yuu nie sgnature W the person deliw.red to ar.a Ihe ~pnsult postmaster fw fee.
da~e of Ael'warv. ~
~ 3. qrtide Adtlressetl io: ~ qa. Article Number
Louise Spano ~ ' P 913 667 712
12498 W 35~h Avenue ~ L~ise Spano '
Wheat Ridge CO 80033
1Z~498 W 35th Avenue
Wh`eat Ridge CO 80033
4b. Service Type
~ CERTIFIED
7. Date of ~elivery
r^'
S.Sig t - (Addressee)
~ RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED M~~ J~~~~ ~~~~~
w~-E- ^'i .
.-.-_ ----. ---- ign~ture-(Agent) ~'/
c POSTMAR r
POSTAGE
SHOWTOWHOM.DHlEN10 flESiRIGTEU / y ~
nooaESSOFne~rvear ~ oEUVeav _ ; PS Form.38~ 1, November 1990
GE(~TIFIEOFEE+RETU~NPEf.EIPT E
TOTAL PPSTAGE ANO FEES 6
nV ~ NOT FORp NiEmFNa TIONPL Mflll V_
8. Addressee's Address
(ONLY i/ ~equested and /ee paid)
DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT i
~
~ -r~'G~..Fui_T--J.~-err-~..r.wa -~.~. ~~ ~..~r F.~... .-.._
_ ~ I,
~~ 3. Article Atltlressetl to: M4a. Article Number
P 913 667 776
Franciszek/Stanislawa Franciszek/Stanislawa
Krawiec Krawiec
ill
~
3405 Miller St er St
3405
M
Wheat Ridge CO 80033 '' Wheat Rid e CO 80033
~ 5
!
~ _ __
~
_.. i r _~; ~ . i ~ _„
l
. ign
ure - (Ad ssee) ~
~ ` -~
oc Gnrinn aanp ~ ^
f=`Yv''° ~ . /IE~ . _ ~
~~
~ POSTAGE ~ E POSTN 6.Signature-~(Agent)
flETURN SHOW TO WI10M.ONlE ANO PESTfiICTEp I /
~
I ^~~SSOrDEUV
¢ f
~
Eav
oEtrveqv
RECEIPT ~
$ERVICE I CERlIFlEOFEE+qET11FNqEf,EIPT I 4 y
i PSForm3811
NOVember1996
~ ro.n~aosracer,rvoFEES ~ ~ ,
XV INSI1flANClI:WEMtitYxVV1UEU-
SENT TO: NOTFOP~NTEPwNeTIONALMPIL
:
~
~
wn~at Ridge CO 80033
John Thomas
3405 Wright Street
Wheat Ridge CO 80033
_ ,~.,,~,, ~ _
5. Signature - (Addressee)
~6. ignature - (Agent)
PS FORM 3800 ~ ~ ~'~~"`~'~G~ ~~
RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED f PS Form 3811, November 1990
urow¢onares
SfLL5ET4CE
~~ ~
4~tn Service Type
~ CERTIFIED
7. Date f f~elyf~r~~, /
~ ( J ~%
8. Addressee's AddrLsk ~
(ONLY if requestedland fee paid.)
~
DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT ''
~ CERTIFIED
7. Date of ~eliver
~-f ~-~/~-/
8. Addressee's Address~ ~
(ONLY if requested and fee paid.)
DONIESTIC RETURN RECEIPT ~i
~
~
t
- I also wish io rece ve me I
following services (for an extra fee~: ',
' S a_ ,_....~ SE~m~ R: ~~ a~~a2Wradditione~s~r"'ces. diaSS
_,_., ~, (] AddresseesAd
~ ,_T ^,,,, _.,._. .---- ^^' ~ POSTMIRI,~ ~ ~~(¢ tlems S.~an eiWre s ~ ~~ fe"ersa o~ «s ~orm ao lHat ~~ ~a^d~$ ~; ~~`m 2 ~ Restr'acted Delivery
~
~~ ~ ~ . ,. Ptint Yow nz~ i,e n~a i~ ~~ tmaster or f,,._
._.-~- ¢ the mailp~,. °i hebw ihe N.i
b~~ C0113U~t P~S
""'^'~`~'_ `a P0.5TAGE j ~''. • q113cI~ lht5 i0YfI1101h~E ~ro111 d., ,
r{- ~~ • Nhita "ReNrn Recv~Pt Rem!estecl on ~ the ~~1uB ot t1~e 4ers°~ deNve2d to
PEiUftN sria++i~.''"~Aq qND~ ~L"~'EavED e Iqa. Article Numbe 7 7 5 ,
pAORESS ~~~ .~ The Reium R~e~t Fea vnN pa`~ Y b 6 7
p ~i date ot tlolHer~. ~] ~~ 3
PEGEIPT CEpT~RE~FEE*qGNRNRECFIPT '~ 3.liftiGlEAddfPS5Edl0: ~
CEFNIGE ~py pp$SAG£ ~'~ ~ES I
vi -- yo~NSUanNCe~°~~"~E°aov~o - 4b. Service Type
r ~ SENT TO'. L »orFOaFFrew~nnow+~n~n~~ pri~hOriY ~
~ Vecchiarelli_ ~ ~ERTIFIED
~` ~ W 35th AVenue
12395 gpp~3 _~
.~n p,nthony Vecchiarel~i ~heat Ridge ~~ f7.DateoPDelivery
'"n 12395 W 35th Aven~~033 ,? ~ - ~ ~
m ~ at Ridge C~ ~~. f ~ ~- .. ;. ,~3 ::,: , :. f~=. -
~ Whe ~ s.., „-. ~ a~~o wish to receive the
followi~xJ services (for an extra fee)'
f
y, ~ Addressee's Pd ress
~ ~ iENCoinp~ere items 1 arAfa 2 tor additional sernces. ~um th~s ca~d
- • Cmqlale ~tem5 3, NM-0a X b, raverse oi tM1~s ipm 50 tltat we cen
~, 7~~~~ ~,,,,, „ame sr~ aasress «~ ~ Ce ~s ~oi ~ 2; ~ Restricted Delivery
ame '^0t'
I ~o vw~ ne~ow me anwie `u'"'~'. ~nsult postmast~r for~
R~CEIPT FOR CERTIFIED ~;~~' e h~~urn Rec~Pt Re0.~~ ~ l~~ ~'+s°~ n~f ~+~+~ ~~" de1"1ef"' a an~ ~~
pg FORM 350~ • The Petum Receipl Fea wtl~ W°- '=~ qa, Article Number ~ 6,~ 7 91
~ "~~ "'~~Ne dressea to: p `113
~~~~~ ^ 3. brtic~e Pd _ ~ -
urts
eonns[~ _.- ~ ~ ~
y,an mwxo~n w,e ~~ oEU~ °~ ,, 4b. Serv~e TYPe _
~.c~vmv ~~~oFOeiMar ' ~ , , ~20 and Weller
~. ' . [tECEiaf ^- c,~rsnr~eocee ~ ae~oawACCCwt a .~, ~right Street ,~ (,ERTIFI~.~ -
s~avice ~ Wli`~~t Ridge Ca 80033 ~
~ IOTN-~STM=F~`DGEES QE '
~ How~~"o`a~ix~ar~anow.~w.a ` 7.Dateof~efrvery -
r- ' SEfvl t0: ~~ _ T , _
F -~- - ~ ~ ~' ~ ~' - II. Addressee's Address aid.
`~ goland w011er 5. Signature -(Addressee} (ONLY if requested and tee p 1
' 'A Wrigh~ Street _ ~
m 3385 Cp 80033 J~ Q~ GJ , d ,~ ' -
~ Wheat Ridge --~~~`Y~~E.
~ 6.Signa ure - (Agerdl
_ ~ ppMESTIC RETURN REGEIPT ~
` a ~-- -. - ~
PS Form 3811, November 199~
, PS FORM 3800 ~ RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED M1~ ,
~~~ -
~,.~. _ . .. ~ - ,
, ~
~
12531 W. 35th Ave.,
Wheat Ridge, Co.,
April 14, 1994
Planning Commission,
Attn: Meredith Reckert
PO Box 638
Wheat Ridge, Co 80034 0638
Gentlemen:
~ CITY OF WHEAT RID` ~
~ , r~n.,~ n~r-,
APR 1 s 1994
~~~-u ~ :
ptq~{~~~,,; ~ DEVELOPMEt~~
I appreciate the notification of Planning Commission Meeting on
April 21st concerning the proposed addition to the Applewood Village
Shopping Center.
It is suggested the Planning Commission consider recommending a
n63,~~ ~Tdinan~e be passed to cover the noise in the center as part of
the approval of the-~,ffi~ndnt~:xt ~:rs• the :~PP3~wvr~d-°~hapg~~g Cen~er.-- s4 ~3~ .
of the Boulder noise ordinance is attached.
The need for a noise ordinance is apparent. I have communicated
with Walmart since they opened, with little success. This included a
petition from the residents bordering on the center which was mailed to
them but was not answered. Finally a personal inqniry resulted in the
answer they were not aware of any letter. A registered letter to the
Walmart Corporati.on failed to get an answer, but the manager did call
and they finally agreed to consider a cover to the loading dock. This
is part of the present plan. The cover to the loading dock is oniy a
small part o£ the problem.
As you are well aware, the Applewood Village Shoppin~ Center is
unique in that the loading' docks are adjacent to t3ie back yards of
residents bordering on the center. Walmart will promise to control the
use of the compactor or unloading of empty pallets at night and the
next week it starts up again. I have made many calls at 2 AM to
discontinue use of the compactor. We requested they get rubber tires
on one of their pallet jacks because of the noise of the iron wheels
vibrating. The noise at night from the pallet jackets is much more
annoying than trucks passing thru. Their answer was it would be too
expensive as the rubber tires would wear_out. I even offered to buy
them a set of rubber tires.
I realize Walmart is a valuable asset to the community and to the
City of Wheat Ridge but they should be a little more conscious of their
neighbors. You work with them on a problem and then they change
managers and you need to start all over again. It is believed a noise
ordinance would solve many of the current problems. Walmart is not the
only pro6lem. Other stores have trash trucks picking up bins and
dropping them late_at night, and diesei trucks unloading with motors
running.
Your assistance would be appreciated.
Sincerely,
i~
C.R. untin
Incl.
~.. ~ ~, 4elJoUtf,~L 7~'T{~. GITY ~
. ~
RIDGE NIE~HBQRFfaOD CO~LFIFION
•
•
•
WE THE FQLLOWINC~ UNDERSIGNEA WHERTRIDGE F'fZQ~'Ef2TY t7b31VER5 DO
HERE$Y F'ETITION THE CITY 0~ WHEATRIDGE~ TI-IE CIi'Y CUUIVCIL,
RLf-~IVIVING CdMMiSSION~ GLANNTNG RND ENGTNEEftIIVG bE~'(~i~TME1Vi"S,
LUTLDTNG DEGAR7iHEIVT AIVD ANY dT1-lER AF'GR~VRL AGENCY TO REOUIRE
THE OWNER(S) AND TENANT(S) OF THE WRLhIAR7 ST~RE LEGALLY
LQCATED TN fiHE AG~'LEWQQD VILLAGE CEfVTER - F'LAfJNED COMMERICAL
DEVELOF'MENT - RMENDED ~'INAL GLFIN ~ dFFICpL DEVELOPMENT F'LAIV,
AMEIVDMENT #k5~ PHRSE 1~ T~ CQN1l~LY YiV i'OTAL TC3 ALL CITY AIVD
STATE CODE~ ZONItVG~ ENC-,INEERING~ DRRTNAGE REG!USREMEIVTS AND
TH4aT THE OWIVERS/TENRNTS GOST SURE7Y ~SDNDING FOR THE
COIVSTRUC7'IQN AhiD IMF'LEME~ITATIOi+1 OF T4-IOSE AND INCLUDING THE
FOLLOWIIU6 ITEMS:
i.INFfi-STRUCTURE: FURNISH A STflRM ARATNAGE REF'G1~T FROM ON
SITE 70 I}OWN 57[~Et~l'~I~ IIVCLUDING CDNTWMIIVATiON Q~ I#2RTGRTTOh!
WRTER~ MAJOR ERROSION TO f-t PF2SME GREENBEL.T RREt-1 f~ND PRIVFITE
RESTDENCESy SURFpGE FLOODING ~F NGRTH RESIDENTIAL AREA.
SURFACE St-iEET DRAII~lRCiE SHALL L~E DIVERTED TO fa NEW UNDERGRGUND
STORI~I 5YSTEM AND ON SITE DETENTTON,
2.INFR-STRUCTURE: hIEED A TRAFFTC STUDY AND DESIGIV SC1LU'fION
FDR GERIMETER OF CENTERy iNCLLIDSNG W. 387H AVE AND YOUIUGFIELLI
STREE7S, WHERE MfaNY ACCIDENTS OCCUR RT NORTH EXIT T~7 W 38TH
AVE AND R RECEIVT FATALITY AIVD MfaNY INJURIES F1T W 38'ft-i ANII
YOiJfV~FIELD. NEED TO AD77RES5 SEMI-TRUC~.S R TRAILERS faCCESSa
E6ftESS flND PRRKING QN SITE. iVEEA TCi F'ftOVTDE RE-AL2GNMEIVT CiF
W 38TH RVE AND YOIJNGFIELD ST.
THE WRTGNT CDURT SNTERSECTiON WI7H W 38TH SNOULD PE CLOSED
TO VEHICULAR TRAFFIC~ W 38TH flUE SHALL RE IhIMi~ROVED WiTH
StlLID 5+7UIVD FENCTlVG DIU THE NORTH, hIEAIAN AIVI7 PERIMETER
LRlVDSCtaGING FOR SDUND f~BATEMEI~IT h1NIJ Tp FURM A VERTICflL
VISUA~ TRANSi'fION FROM A 4Q~FT 1-II~}-1 COMI+1ERTCRL STRUCTURE T~ A
RESIDENTIAL SCALE ON THE NdRTN.
IS THERE A GWRK (V RID6 ~R A MAJQt2 RTD TERI~IINAL~ NEED TO
SOLVE~THIS RUS TRAF~IC?
3. EXF'ANSTON GLAI~ES: SULiMITTAL NEEDS TCI COMGLY TO ZONIIVG
ftEQUIRMENTS GIVING EXISTSNG RIVD NEW E~UILDING RF'ERS, PA~ti:IiV~
NEW AND EXISTIIVG~ AND ACCURACY flF X'LANS-ELEVATIOh7S SE, WIDTH
OF GAf2DEIU SHOP ON El..EVWTSQtJ IS 7.4•FT WIDE AND ON F'LRN
DIMENSION IS 33FT. T{iERE IS IVO ACTI.JA~ ~'.,R~iDE VARIATIGN SNDWN
ON THE DRAWINGS, EXISTItVG GRADE 13ROP8 EI'70 1~hFT FRnM CQRN£R
DF EXYSTIIV~, BUTLDIN~ TQ W 387N FLC7W LTNE, THTS IS A MAJOR ICE
Ai~tD 4JlaTER PR~&LEM DURIIVG WINTER CONAI7If]NS AND f~LSO INCREASES
COMMERICRL BUTLDIN~ MASS T^ SOME 4~F1' HEI~HT ABOVE NORTH
RESIDENTIAL DISTf2TCT.
THERE IS ONLY 10X OF TOTAL LANA DEDICATED T~ LARfDSCAF~IiVG
THSS IS RELRTIVIL.Y LOW l~ND i'NEftE f5 iU0 Ci~NSIDERATICIN DF
SCREENING F~ARKEll VEHICLES ON hIQRT4i AIVD WEST GERTMETERS
EXISTIN6 F'L.AiVTING IS INRDE~UATE. SF'pCIN6 OF ~ICKETS AT ~RRDEIV
SH~P PEf2IMETER IFtQ1V FENCE SHRLL BE M7NIMUM ~F 4 IN. OfC.
~ ~.
.~
~
~
-~-
~
BLlILDIIVG DEST~,N IS N07 COMGATIL~LE WITH ADJRCEIVT CENTER IN
SCALE~ MASSIN~i AND C~LQR IT ALSO DQES NUT ~~Rt7VIDE ANY
TRRN5ITIQNAL MRSSSNG OR COLOR COi+'IG'ATRfiIL,TTY TO THE ADJpCEIVT
RESTDENTIAL DISTRICT. IT SEEMS R WEST EXPAI~SIpiV T~ THE NEW
VESTIBULE WOULD SOLVE THE ARER REQUIRI~IEN75~ AND GR~VTDE A
DI5PURSED F'ARI:ING SOLUTIiJN WITH BETTER ACCESS FRqM NORTH RND
WEST FIRTERIALS, Ti-fE PRO~'OSED F'RRKT146 SDLUTSON DUMPS G75
VEHICLES ONT^ R 3@F7 WIDE, PEDESTRIAfiI CROSS-OVER HANDTCf~F~,
DRIVEWC-1Y AIVD DOES NpTHSNG BUT COf~lGEST diV SITE i+'tQVEh9EhIT AMD
OVERLOADS THE NQRTN EXIT.
~
GUBLYC NQTIF'ICATION O~ ALL CHfaNGES TO F'LANNED COMMERICRL
DEVEL0~IMENTS IS REOUIR~D BY LRW, IF WE HAD IVOT F~ROTESTED
THTS MGDIFICATION Tt] TFIE GLAh!!+lIIV~ DEPARTMEIV~, WE MAY NOT !-IRVE
BEEIV F~RI+7ALLY NOTIFIED OF A iVEIGHL-~ORHODD InEE'fSN~.
WE 7HE UNDERSSGNEI7 RECUEST THR-f' ITEM5 CQI4TAIh1ED NERE SIV EiE
IMMGLEMEN7ED BY THE F'RqROSER R1VD THAT NO AF~PRQVt~L OF THIS
F~ROJECT BE GIVEN UNTIL [~LL REQLIIRMENT5 HAVE E~EEN RF80LVED,
p~tu. fVRME ~ ADDRESS `_ S GNAT E DflTE~
l ~a~.Pt~ P. S/+~.-r~.o i $I~
3sun N/1u~~C~•1~U~.CO ~'-~ --.-^ ___~_ .~
a f ~~rt+~-~. ~a • 5r~u7avrdu.~ ~, ' // „ ,~ `~~ l9~ 9'4
(_I 380 ~ Wa~r~z G-r . W I~. cp ~_ ~
~ 3 michael ~. Le.~iS ~/7~.,:~/~/!~' ~.~.~~_. ~/-/7-9~
3$~a ~~ris~hl- C f. ~x12. C,C~ j
4 5~nnort ~I- . I._e~~5 ~`~tc~rnmrt~Q'~.~s-~ l7
3S12~ l~'lriohfi Ci". I.JIZ. CI~
'~~ ~ ~~~vz~•~~IA~~~ /7 i~
) ~~'~ ~ Gt~/1~~=f, ('~ /..I~'~ ~ // ~ ~ i
~ ~/tl1- %, .~~Y~Y11,vr ~ -, _ P -.. - ^ '~/f7-9sC ~ -
~ ~~~~~,/lT,er-.C.c ~~~ _ ~ .~ ~/i.,~i~af ~ . ~ ~Jah~ ~ ~7 9~- ~
~ A~~Jo~fl ~ KJ~r.~~~ ~}.~w.a~.l.t~ ~un 7~~, ~---~~-5`~ ~f~
I Q~l W'~~G~Z' CT~ n I 1
$ ~ i~:l/ ^i7~c~ie.// Gr/°YL%~~~ `~/7~y
•
~ ~~~~ ~r,sy~ G',~ -
~~.~~r, ~~.~.z,G'~i' ~i~2if,.~, .i .- />-95~,
~ oa ~~ i~~~J'~~i
`b VnrOJ !'1 i J~1 ~ ! 0 GU ~ / / ' \ J.~„ACJUA-- /7 ~ ~~ ~/ / ~/ 7 7
3 ~ ~v~ ~-~TC,~ Co/'~,~~ U ___ ___(~
~ ~~ ~A2t.~S f1 , ~c~u~F L~- ~~ ~'~ur,(.~ ~1~1g. 5~
i~~ ' ~~z w?r~r C..~.wWn, ~ ~ _ ( ^
#
~
~
~
j~
-a-
DATE
S~ ~~f-~~/
/ ~ ~J.~s u~ 3~ G~-P, ----.--~----_-
=~ ;~- ,j• yir~
~
I SIGiV(aTUFZE
iVf~ME_R_ADDF~ES5-f_----- ~„ ~~~ -
~~- ~ ~,~v • ~~_~~~~"~
~' ~3 ~~1~i~'I~'c~Y U,~c~~ .7~- ,~~ ~o,r~.~ ~.~rr - - I,.
~ _/,~`~~rv,3~ir"'S'~v r~~ , ~ ~-~x-9s~'i
~ i.. r~ -e
~ ~ ~~ ~~fh ~,~ - _. _ ~----~I
_`--`- ~, o ~.~c~a--=
` ~` ~ ~ ~l ~()J_[' ~ n ~+ !J C i /rY.,~e'_ M.
~S ~ ~ °~.-il ~l n r` ta 1.~. ~ 7'd.~~ _ ---"~^ '
~.~ ~r ~~4 ~ ' G~ S.S' ~R N '/ / -~f
3 s~~~ w~3 ~ q_ ~ S%•.- --=-
, ~. ~ ~- ~ti 3 ~' t'` ~T ~ ~,~v ~ r
~ - ~o~.~
~ ~._ ~ ~ c____ ` `-'-__- , - ~I - I £r- ~' ~1. ~
` ~ -.~C ~ ..
~ ~~ag ~ ~ 3a ~ v~ ____-___ _ --
~ ~.~~----- ~~~: q~
~
.t~i ~~ `~~~ ~'
,
i~.~~a3 C~.~11~~' - -__ - ~ r'.~"-H~~''_,
( 2b GG ,. S v!~ ~~fA A/ 1~~ ,~, ~~+~L~~- ~.
~` .~ ~i~ l~~~ t~ ST ~,.~~ ~
; !~-/~
42~ _,P~i=n~~ .~U.~~rA-~ ~" ~
~~0~/ ~ii~i~-~,(_f~" • ~f - ~,1~~ ~la3-~la~
'ZZ ~~ \\~,~ ~~-~1~~ t~ .~rn , ---~--~
~ . ~~ ~.3~ti,.~, ~ ~~~ - I!
{'~ ~ ~ f.~ ,~~~ ~
1e-( A , /
1 1 ~..~ . . v/ /. ° ~JJ ~/~ n ._ _
~Z`~ ~,o v.c~,,~..~~~- `, -
1 ,~~ t~ (.~.s{ ' ~~~ ~f„2~~32~= ~
~ ~~ ... ,~v ~ ~-
-~ ia~~~ l~/..~'~,~~ ~ ~-T.y~ - y.zd9y~
~ ~t/i/e ~' ~. - e w ~ s .. '~~~' aC-~' _
s'yv Gd ' -~' '~
_ ~ ~-_
3 ~~..9'~
~21 ~DRoTy ~• ~v~.s . _ -
• ,~g~r, c. ~~~;~~.5~ -- - ----- - ~~
~g /~y rj-~ --- ~ ~ ~ ~~ i
hJ L~~~9f1' /I:~ '~ ~~i.d'LG(,i 1~ -~./j y.
/ il'7 a.
~--_ _ ___
/ z y~ 7 ~r.,~ 3sS'~_~~ _ -s ._
t ' . ,
~
O, NAME R ADDRESS SIGNATUR~ DATE
_...
--- _.
~ ----
. ~ ~ / ~ tric'/Y.~ ;q///J fi /d,.Sc7 e} ~' -- r /t v1./G~ /~-~Jis~is.~y Y~- ~ O-y
/2.S Cl ~ ~~ .~j ~`z".~ hs'~u'~~
i~~ n vi ~.. ,. - , jr~l P v^ - ~-A-~i i.AJ a~.J'Q -%S~
i f o? ~~/G 7 ~ ~.-~ll~. ~~~ _ ~
:----_ -- - --
-4-
•
~
I
•
_~
~
I
~
f--
~
i
it
~
~f
~-
~
~ (
I I
i
;
i
i
~
~
1
1
_ '__"_ ".... ;+
~
~j
~1
~
~
. -
F
E ~
!
_ _ _.
-
F
t f
'
~
}
`~
. __.-...__ _'__-__ _
s~ ~
~
~
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission Date Prepared: Apr31 7, 1994
Date of Meeting: April 21, 1994 Case Manager ~Meredith Reckert
Case No. & Narae: WZ-94-4/Wal-Mart
Action Requested: Approval o£ an amendment to a£inal
development plan
Location of Request: 3600 Young£ield Stre.et
Name/Address of Applicant(s): General Management Company
13900 ~ Harvard Avenue
Aurora CO 80014
Name/Address of Owner(s): Same
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Approximate Area: 29.9 acres
Present Zoning: Planned Commercial Development
Present Land iJse: Retail
Surrounding Zoning: ~ R-1; ,~ R-2, RC-1, R-C; Ei R-2, R-lA,
RC-1; W• I-70
Surrounding Land Use: N: church, low density residential; ~
commercial, low density residential; ~
low density residential; W: I-70
Comprehensive Plan for Area: Commercial Activity Center
--------------------------------------------------------------
Date Published: April 5, 1994
Date to be Posted: April 7, 1994
Date Legal Notices Sent: April 7, 1994
Agency Check List (XX) Attached () Not required
Related Correspondence ( ) Attached (XX) None
----------------------------------------------------------------
ENTER INTO RECORD:
(XX) Comprehensive Plan (XX) Case File & Packet Materials
(XX) Zoning Ordinance (XX) Slides
( ) Subdivision Regulations (XX) Exhibits
JURISDICTION:
The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all
notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore
there is jurisdiction to hear this case.
',,
~ ~
Planning Commission Staff Report Page 2
Case No. WZ-94-4/Wal-Mart
2. ~REOUEST
The applicant requests agproval of an amenchnent to the Applewood
Village Shopping Center final development plan.
II. SITE PLAN
The purpose of the proposed amendment is to facilitate the expansion
of the existing Wal-Mart store on the northern portion of the shopping
center.
Wal-Mart currently has around 105,000 square feet of interior store
space plus the existing £enced garden area on the north end o£ the
store. The existing development plan shows 6,000 square £eet o£
fenced garden area, however, this area has been expanded illegally
throughout the years. _
The amendment proposes a 22,219 square foot expansion to the north, a
3700 square £oot enclosed garclen center and 14,700 square feet of
outdoor garden center. A ten-£oot-high wrought iron £ence surrounds
the garden area. The vestible at the £ront has been increased to
9,000 square feet in size and the loading dock on the east side in the
alley will be enclosed. The eastern-most curb cut on West 38th Avenue
has Leen moved to the west. The brick building at the northeast
corner o£ the site will be demolished to aCCOmmodate the expansion.
With the proposed addition, the shopping center would have 27~
building coverage, 62~ parking coverage and,9$ landscaped coverage.
The shopping center as a whole has adequate parking.
II2. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING
A meeting for neighborhood input was held on April 5, 1994
attendance were:
Meredith Reckert
Glen Gidley
John Oss
Bob Middaugh
Jacque Wedding-Scott
Jerry Biehl - General Management
Anne Pearson - General Management
Paul Crabtree - Colorado Land Consultants
Kent Prinslow - Colorado Land Consultants
Jerry Nemitz, 3621 Wright St
Bill Mitchell, 3802 Wright Ct
Georgia Mitchell., 3802 Wright Court
Tony Ficco, 12425 W 38th Ave
Ken Lewis, 3840 Wright Street
ArnoZd Kuether, 3$11 Wright Ct
Mike Lewis, 3812 Wright Ct
Ralph Santangelo, 3801 Wright Court
Those in
~ ~
Planning Comm3ssion StaP£ Report Page 3
Case No. WZ-94-4/Wal-Mart
Chris Tjapkes, 3810 Youngfield
Donna Miller, 3773 Wright
Anthony Vecchiarelli, Z2395 W 35th Ave
Concerns expressed included the £ollowing:
Garden center screening
Aesthetics of the Wal-Mart store - it needs to be consistent with the
rest o£ the center
Outdoor loudspeakers used in,the garden center
Closure o£ the branch post of£ice
Drainage problems created on W 35th Avenue, W 38th Avenue and the
Wright St area north o£ the center
Runof£ from the center into the irrigation ditcI'i
The RTD bus terminus on the property
The confusion £or vehicular tra££ic at the Youngfield/38th/I-70
intersection
Operational concerns regarding on-site trash
Semi-trailers and shipping boxes on the property
On-site vehicular circulation
IV. AGENCY REFERRAL3
Ali outside agencies can serve the property.
Public Works 3s requesting that drainage on the property be collected
and conveyed to a future storm sewer placed in West 38th Avenue. They
have agreed to re-stripe West 38th Avenue to accommodate a left-hand
turn into the property. The Pree right-hand turn £rom Youngfield onto
West 38th Avenue may be eliminated.
V. STAFF RE(:OMMENAATIpNS
There are three di££erent types o£ issues which have been raised
regarding this request.
A. Those issues that directly relate to this proposed expansion which
staff expects and recommends are to ba accomplished by Wal-Mart
and/or the owner o£ the shopping center;
B. Recommendations that relate to the shopping center as a whole
and some off-site impacts and issues that staff expects and
recommends are accomplished by the owner o£ the shapping center at
some time in the near £uture; and
C. Those issues and concerns which the City, through the Capital
Improvement Program, should accomplish at some time in the near
future.
A. PLAN SPECIFIC RECOMMFNDAmIONS
1. Regarding the "Garden Center"
a. In addition to the iron fencing shown, some
~
Planning Commission Sta£f Report
Case No. WZ-94-4/Wal-Mart
~
Page'4
additional view-obsci~ring screening should be used along
the north and east sides.
b. Lighting should be designed so as to prohibit direct
glare and/or excess light bleed onto the properties to
the north and east.
c. No outside loudspeakers or audio broadcast systems
shall be used.
2. Regarding the building addition and exterior renovation,
staff recommends that the architectural treatment, including
color and use o£ gable facades match that of the building
which extends to the south.
3. The proposed freestanding sign be revised to include the
Applewood Shopping Center design element used on other siqns
in the Center.
4. Regarding parking lot and street access and street
improvement issues:
a. Extension of a sidewalk along West 38th Avenue to
the east will be requ3red and that handicapped access be
provided into the development from West 38th Avenue.
b. It is recommended that an additional main drive be
provided toward the western side. There currently is a
drive going south from the westerly curb cut. That drive
could be curved to align with the drive behind
Blockbuster, or it could remain as is.
Additionally, staff recommends that all parking ends be
landscaped and that the transition of the building front
drive at the south end of Wal-Mart be improved in design.
B. LARGER SHOPPING CENTER ISSUES
1. There are existing (historic) drainage problems that the
shopping center has caused for the surrounding residential
areas. Sta£f recommends that the owner and the City work
together to correct those drainage problems. Those facilities
that would be located on private property would be the owner's
financial responsibility, whereas those beyond the private
property boundaries would be the City's responsibility.
Timing of on-site drainage improvements should correspond to
the City's project.
2. Vehicular circulation coming from the south (West 32nd
Avenue) is very poorly designed. Staff has sketched a
possible solution that would provide more structured
channelization, See attached Exhibit 'A'.
~ ~
Planning Commission Sta£f Report Page 5
Case No. WZ-94-4/Wal-Mart
C. CIT~' ISSUES
1. The neighbors to the north have requested a sound wall
and closure of Wright Court. Sta£f will approach Council for
approval and funding of this pro~ect.
2. There needs to be a left turn-in lane (west bound) at
the easterly curb cut. The City will re-strip West 38th
Avenue.
3. The City may eliminate the £ree right turn at the
intersection of Young£ield and West 38th Avenue; thus
increasing the corner land area for landscape improvements.
This con£iguration contributes to the con£usion at this
intersection.
4. On-site drainage needs to be properly collected and
conveyed via a storm sewer system. Those portions of the
system that are beyond the shopping center boundaries wiil be
recommended to City Council £or Capital Improvement Program.
Although the details have not been worked out, a storm sewer
system would be instalied in West 38th Avenue running north in
Wright Street and dumping into Clear Creek. If this concept
is approved by City Council, it would most likely occur next
summer.
RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move that Case No. WZ-94-4, a request by
General Management Company £or approval of an amendment to a Final
Development Plan £or the Applewood Shopping Center Planned Commercial
Development be forwarded to City Council with a recommendation £or
APPROVAL, based upon the following £indings and with the
recommendations as set £orth in the sta££ report, Section V.
Findings:
1. There is jurisdiction £or the City to consider this request;
2. Al1 agencies indicate that they can serve the proposal; and
3. All requirements of the Zoning Ordinance have been met, or will
be met based upon the conditions recommended.
<pc>srwz944
~ ~
CASE N0. WZ-94-4
~ AGENCY REFERRALS SUMMARY ~
XX Fire: rr,,r.o~+ a;,~,.oi r,~ ~-,-,.r, ~m.. °
Schools:
XX Water: Irn„Gr,i;~a+P~ M„+„aii Can serve_
XX Sewer: (Westridael Can serve.
XX US West Communications:
XX Public Service Co: -.
State Land Use Comm. (over 5 acres):
State Geologist:
State Highway: ~- -
Je££erson County:(HEALTH, COMMISSIONERS, PLANNING)
Adjacent City:
American Cablevison:
CITY DEPARTMENTS
XX Public Works: c~~ ~+->~~ ~~^v~_ -.
Parks & Recreation:
Police: ,
XX Building Inspection: tvo nrohlemG_
pc/Agencyrefsum
~ ~'
.
~ V ' ,-::.;,
' ~ ~ o! ~
; ~
~ ~ ~,~ r
I ~~
~ 1
~_
. . ~ --
~~
~s ~~~
~
;+
OL 31V1Stl3LN1 . I '
1 r
~ 'Im
~ i~ ~ai~-e,r -
---- ---- ---- ---- ~ _ --- ~
~.
~, ,, . .
~~
~ $I
N ~
~~~~
~ A~~
~
~
}a~
~r- ~
t- ~ ~ a
~
J
~~~F~
~
F~
~ J O
r}-
~ ~~ U ~
1 I ~ +
LJ- V ~ ~
~ Q Q
~ F ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
V Z ~
~'
'{'j'" Z ~ O
~
O
- ] ~ ~
~
~
N
30 ~ ~
~
Hts ~ico ea sn~
tFa~ e~' YWM
01 txt <p+ ( Wa~
ocsUl~i~~ ~MS(
t1u~ OtftRi~~tia{lk0~Cµ1~{TiC
,..pRiia+~~es iT~~x'E'ies~osuKO t~ o'~ce, ~~q~~S ~~ ~FE i~ WLt J` 1
p~~:kE GaMM1G ~~ 0~ E v11C0
li fI~YEO ~ twtEt'1 t. ~cYtCKiNG.TtJti•~~,~tMt*EtAS4NG YO ~~•R
~~.GAP{M~i SU![RYIS5~~0 OV,09 4tA 4N~ C~[X
Afl~ICA6lf 1~ lOll~
t. CM~CtfIE fU~~K 9A SCCitO`1 161• - Y
GE~t If f C~~ 1~• o
StAY1U~ lM~~ MS
~tqµ OISTIttGT. ceWE(i l. VxE +VfHUC GO~WMa ~~ER
1.N~E f1WlNRTIKIFi
ilGl ~SOp yfit 1~App tOSIS .
OISSFICT. TRE ~E t~y~j.404~ _.,^
, NEyJ ~ "~c~Ti[~16 fE c.
~ SNE ~SC~~Y'J
' ~~h E%1~jZ.
=~a p~~~~' O~yy . . . . . . ~ ' "
~
~ ~ 1162.99 ~- ~
~
p•5L8 E . C ~ ~ ~nWi °~
tt 5 ~ a. ~,c ~pp05 tW
. ~~~^~~...~ ,_._ _..- ~~See~ r
~_. ~•J.IyKR~ti `L Y~' . : p
~~~• x _ ~~0~~
K 0~
1 NEYJ ~pµfN'( "~3~ ~ ' ~ r ~Kf^
~ ' (AMEN ::. flPi
~ ~
~ M1 ':,.;: .~~1~i
5 u
~ ~ ~S~i
or E ~cs
1 .KlN6 SO ..., '.. , J~
.cns 1 NEW LaNONSt -,, n
NaME 31
'` ~
~ (AME
1
p.,s. W'~
' ~ ~
~ ~~.
t
n~t~T ~
o~ ,,
~' ~~~ ~,~
i ~! ~ /~
~ ~ ~
1 r
~
~'
t~
~l,~
,1 F' 1
~^~
v n~,~'
r '
II
~l'
4~~ /~~
P f
? t
~ _Sv a~%
~ ~
/~~~a
O~^ '
r `~o}~
O
~. •tGm~~~µyw
s. ~ ~r wr""~`'
. NEuJ ~~~b ~'ttKb~
~ '
~ ~ ~~~ ~f~bS~PWb.
I
~ To 6 ~ ~ ~'`~~~ n0 ~`~",~yc' vr~ -r ~,y~.wu I ~
E ~,,,~yp
~ 11~~ a~ 'IIIEES ~//,/ /'~~ ~/ ~r~- '
~ ~~t/ ",~ . ~
J 1 M
\ ~i~ ~,R ~ ~,e
; r.ec
' ~r ~ i/~ ;~.i.~; t°~~ ~~ ~ NT
,~ _ ,~~~,- ., rb 5~ .~r. ` . r ~~ f.Fb
'mT ~ " ~,., ~jfy~ j~~j ~ ~~~~ ~` ~ `~,
7. ~' ", r• o
` ' , ,y,ur• ~' ~ 7~1 rnr: t ~
I 1 ~ ~j ~ /'~ ~ ~M^~,~ ~
1 ~ ~,I~F ~ a c..w 1~ Nyt RKZ 'N~' 1
r, /i ~< Y, 1 1~^--"^~ *b 1.8 € ~
~, ,. ~~ , ~ w ~„ 5~~30A~
: i ~-•
). . ~ ° C~~ f _
rt~~~ ~
~ • ~ ~, b' ~ n. ~ ~y~y~ fr`l P W U P°"o~ a6 ~ < ~ ~.
( x 4 _
/ ~. ,av±+,"„ , n w`~ ~ ~ ~ ~.M~~D. f'r3 ~ ~ ,E,,,.~ 7
~ /J 'r ~ ~ ~'~„3~--~, _~.--> G
/ ~_~ .~--- J' :-• ~ ~ ~T- t
, ~, _ Cl/ -4~7dX6#~V"- ~ l' .'.S ~ ~ . ^
/" ~_ `~~ 10.A~6J~~5 Pp,(t~~ 41'~ ~ ~ ~I ~ .
~~~y~0 4
~'. ,_~'f ~ ._ 2 1l1 $~ OF +„' ~"~ -..,, ;
(~ 1~ ~
~1 ~~ ~1 , .... ~Y•
. ~ `y 'n ^ f~ ~ ~~ F
~.~y~~ ~~L~~-' M
-y„'r"yea.nW _ -
_ °`v~6-c_A~"~„ --" ~ K ~ m
...o~~.---~' . N WOO4 I} v
~ A R1 ~E T
t
~ f~D ~ ~
I f,PPLE-.lAS , SGnn~D ~ ,~..~,,; ° ^ ~
~ I :L~au~ ~;;QU +~i ~ : ~ :- ~ ~ ~'
~ ~, ~ ,~..-.
~ PUBLIC HEARING SP~CEAS~ LIST
CASE N0: WZ-94-4 DATE: 04-21-94
REpUESTS An application by General Management Company for approval
of an amendment to the Planned Commercial Development
final development plan for the Applewood Village Shopping
Center located at approximately 3600 Youngfield:5treet.
i
~
; SPEAKER~S NAHE ~ ADDRESS (PLEASE PRINT)
I / i.~ ~°/~° .a.~.. -.?
~ ~!~ ~1~~'t~~G~C:"I:
,
, ~
~~~ ~
~s
~ ,
; %~"' _ -~.,~ ~;,~e L~p ~
t / vlC~ ,~f"`~{} n,-`: "1 R/'~
,
~ ~~M':- ~{~~~'" ~~ , ~
,:_ ~ _ .
' ±:,r
~
~
~
~
~
~
i
i
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~ ..
~
~
~ •
~
~
~
~
i
i
~
~
~
i
~
i
i ._
i
i
i
i
Position Qn
(Please
IH FAVOR ;
Reque~t;
Check) ;
OPPaSED ;
~
~
~/ ;
v,, ,
,
,
,
.,
,
~ '
,
~
;
l ~ ;~,.
~
!.~' ~
~
~
~
~
.
~
~
~
~
~
.;
~
_~
~
~
~
Planning Commiss3on Minutes
April 21, 1994
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. APPROVE THE ORDER OF THE AGENDA
~
Page 2
Vice Chairman ECKHARDT requested the addition o£ two items under
New Business; 1) State Legislature "Takings Bill", and 2), the
recent joint meeting with City Council. With those additions,
Commissioner JOHNSON moved to approve the agenda £or the meeting
of April 21, 1994 as amended. Commissioner CRUMPTON seconded the
motion.' Motion carried 5-0.
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Vice Chairman ECKHARDT pointed out typographical errors on page
12, last paragraph (the misspelling of his name and extra words
"be could") in the last line. He requested that the words "to
connect with the Greenbelt walkway along the East" be added to
the eighth sentence in the paragraph. On page 14, £irst
paragraph the word "was" should be added following the.word "he"
in the second sentence.
Commissioner CERVENY noted that he was absent from a portion of
the meeting and he wouid vote to approve the portion he attended.
With those corrections, Commissioner CERVENY moved to approve the
minutes for the meeting of April 7, 1994. Commissioner LANGDON
seconded the motion. Motion carried 4-0, with Commissioner
JOHNSON abstaining.
6. PUBLIC FORUM (This is the time Por anyone to speak on any
subject not appearing under Item 7, of the Public Hearing
section o£ the agenda.)
No one signed the roster nor came Porward to speak at this time.
7. PUBLIC HEARING
t~'~ 1. Case No. WZ-94-4: _An application by General Management
~ Company for approval of an amendment to the Planned
Commercial Development final development plan for the
Applewood Village Shopping Center located at
approximately 3600 Youngfield Street.
~/ Mr. Gidley presented the staff report. Entered and accepted into
the' record were the Zoning Ordinance, case file, packet materials
and exhibits.
Commissioner LANGDON asked if RTD would park on the street?
Mr. Gidley stated that if the owner terminates the easement, the
City would encourage bus stops be placed on both sides o£ West
38th Avenue.
~
Planning Commission Minutes
April 21, 1994
Commissioner LANGDON asked how wide is 38th Avenue?
Page 3
Mr. Gidley answered it is a 60-£oot right-o£-way, however, it is
somewhat wider near Young£ield.
Commissioner CERVENY asked i£ additional impervious material
would be added to the development with this addition?
Mr. Gidley answered there will be no increase in impervious
surfaces.
Commissioner JOHNSON asked i£ there would be a curb cut on the
northeast? None is shown,on the plan.
Mr. Gidley stated a curb cut currently exists that is used as a
service drive. This would not change, he added.
Commissioner JOHNSON asked i£ the trucks would make a U-turn to
back into the docks?
Mr. Gidley answered there is another way, however, he hoped it
was not being done. The trucks could come through the
neighborhood. Comments from the audience indicated the trucks
were now going through the neighborhood. He added that if that
is true, then signs should be installed prohibiting same.
Commissioner LANGDON asked about the trucks backing into the
tlocks aPter pulling out into West 38th Avenue.
Mr. Gidley stated that trucks could come of£ Young£ield
end of King Soopers and down and around.
Commissioner CERVENY asked Mr. Gidley to explain further
the straight-through drive aisle he had suggested.
to the
about ~ ~ ._ .- ,~
Mr. Gidley pointed to the location of the current straight-
through drive aisie. He drew on the transparency pro~ected
overhead a possible drive-through aisle location.
Discussion £ollowed regarding parking lot variables.
Paul Crabtr.ee, Colorado Land Consultants, ,~tave Wilson. Colorado
Land Consultants, and Jerrv Biehl, General Management Company
were sworn in.
Paul Crabtree stated he represented the appiicant. He added that
he had reviewed the staff recommendations with Wal-Mart and found
nearly all acceptable. He explained. Concerns with staff's
recommendations he mentioned were building elevation, gables and
painting and also mentioned that audio broadcast systems could be
lowered to an acceptable level and parking ends might not all be
~
~
Planning Commission Minutes
April 21, 1994
~
Page 4
landscaped at once. He noted that the parking lot configuration
might change until a workable plan could be found.
Commissioner JOHNSON asked if there had been a drainage study
performed by an engineer done on the parking lot? He thought the
timing would be good iP on-site grading was planned.
Mr_ Crahtree stated he was unaware if a full drainage study had
been done on the entire center. He noted that landscaping would
be added and therefore, less impervious material used. Drainage
patterns would not change.
Vice Chairperson ECKHARDT asked Mr. Gidley if a drainage study
was done for the entire shopping center.
Mr. Gidley stated there was no current drainage study. The
Department o£ Public Works did not require a study, since
drainage patterns are not changing. He added that when the City
improves West 38th Avenue, a runo££ study and analysis would be
necessary to determine how much water is coming off the center,
where it's going and how it can be collected.
Commissioner LANGDON was concerned how and where the water drains
currently.
Mr. Gidley stated that drainage is a neighborhood issue and has
been an issue for many years. He elaborated.
Vice Chairperson ECKHARDT asked about sidewalk along West 38th
Avenue.
Mr. Crabtrea stated,,.~hey,planned_..to;,.aontinue.~he.ex~sti~g. ... ;.:
~~sidewalk to the end o£ the property.
Tonv Ficc~, 12425 West 38th Avenue was Sworn in. Mr. Ficco was
in favor of retaining the free right turn lane; he stated he
thought the parking lot plan was ridiculous; he complained that
the proposed additional sidewalk goes nowhere; he noted ongoing _
drainage problems; Mr. Ficco saw problems with the garden center
con£iguration; and stated there would be a serious elevation
change at the north end. He discussed drainage problems at
length.
Vice Chairperson ECKHARDT stated that City engineering would
study further the £ree right turn lane onto 38th. He asked i£
Mr. Ficco's comment about the parking lot design concerned the
elimination o£ the north-south driving aisle?
Mr. Ficco stated that the north-south drive aisle had been
removed to accommodate parking £or customers generated from the
proposed addition. He felt this would create multiple problems
to a parking lot that is already very congested.
~
Planning Commission Minutes
April 21, 1994
~
Page 5
Vice Chairperson ECKHARDT asked about Mr. Ficco`s comment about
the garden center.
Mr_ F;cco stated that an area had been provided for loading,
however, the parking plan was poor.
Vice Chairperson ECKHARDT addressed Mr. Ficco's comment about the
proposed sidewalk going nowhere. He added the hope was that the
sidewalk eventually would coritinue to the east, however the
developer is responsible to provide sidewalk to the property
line. Regarding Mr. Ficco's concerns about drainage problems,
Vice Chairperson ECKHARDT stated presently the Pubiic Works
Department is investigating the situation.
Mr_ Fir.nn pointed out that when a developer comes to the city
with a plan to build, he is required to properly handle drainage
water.
Vice Chairperson ECKHARDT noted that this is was not a new
project but a preexisting situation. Otherwise, the developer
would provide a drainage study, etc.
Commissioner LANGDON asked Mr. Ficco to describe the drainage
problems following a rainstorm.
Mr_ F;~~Q_did so, using the site plan pro,jected overhead. He
reiterated that the drainage problems need to be addressed now.
Ralnh Santanaalo, 3801 Wright Court was sworn in. Mr. Santangelo
stated he was a longtime resident oP Wheat Ridge. Amor~g his
concerns were existing drainage problems, the lack of
~.,cuzUs_/gut.t,ers,,ponds, acell=/decell.lanes-indicated on the plan. -
No traffic study was performed. He elaborated. Mr. Santangelo
suggested only one entrance/exit on the north side of the center.
At this time, he submitted a petition, which was labelled Exhibit
'A'. He added that he is not opposed to the addition, he just
wants the design to be compatible, and the problems he mentioned
remedied. _
Mr. Gidley read into the record, a letter from Kathleen Krager,
P.E., dated February 22, 1994, who per£ormed a traffic study.
She indicated no traffic increase with this addition.
Mr_ Santannelo noted that the traffic engineer did not address
on-site circulation, additional parking required, etc.
Mr. Gidley stated she was addressing the impact on the public
street system only.
Mr_ Santan~reln was hopeful that the entrance/exit onto West 38th
Avenue could be impro~ed and a sound barrier, landscaping and
curb and gutters installecl.
i
~
Planning Commission Minutes
April 21, 1994
~
Page 6
Vice Chairperson ECKHARDT asked Mr. Santangelo i£ he was asking
for curb and gutter on the north side o£ West 38th Avenue?
Mr. Santannelo stated he was. He £elt West 38th Avenue should be
improved and the tra£fic problems be solved by widening, etc.
with the completion of the addition.
Mr. Gidley the city did give thought to providing an additional
lane on the south edge of West 38th Avenue, however, it would
require removal of all mature trees along the north side of the
shopping center. Ae elaborated.
Mr_ SantanaPlo said that a 60-foot right-of-way was more than
adequate to handle three lanes of traffic.
Mr_ ridle~ said the city could stripe three lanes of traffic. He
added that when this case goes be£ore City Council, decisions can
be made to proceed with Purther studies to alleviate I.ong-
standing drainage and traffic problems.
Discussion £ollowed.
xen LPwis, 3840 Wright Street was sworn in. Mr. Lewis and his
family are long-standing residents, He listed among his concerns
noise, dirt, traffic and trash generated by the shopping cen~ter.
Mr. Lewis suggested the city close Wright Court prior to Wal-Mart
starting this project. He elaborated on drainage problems
su£fered many years by surrounding residents. Mr. Lewis informed
those present that Applewood Shoppinq Center is colleCting from
the City rebated tax dollars amounting to approximately $90,000
per month. He added that if Wright Court is closed, signs should
, be.placed_on-,Wright Street.and West .38th Drive_stating-"not a~
through street". He elaborated.
Commissioner LANGDON asked for further information.regarding the
tax rebate program.
Mr. Gidley stated the rebate.stated the maximum time period for
the tax rebate is ten years, The maximum amount that can.be
collected is approximately $2.5 million. This program, called
ESTIP was adopted in the late 1980s to encourage existing Wheat
Ridge husinesses to expand and to attract new retail business to
the City. He added that the funds rebated are to be used £or
improvements on and around the center. He elaborated.
Commissioner LANGDON stated that if he understands correctly, the
rebated funds could be used for needed_storm sewer improvements,
curb and gutter, etc.
Mr. Gidley stated a portion of the funds will be used to make
some of the drainage improvements. He added that the city
~
Planninq Commission Minutes
April 21, 1994
~
Page 7
departments had discussed the needed improvements, although no
plans exist at present. He elaborated.
Commissioner JOHNSON asked who administers the ESTIP program and
what are restrictions?
Mr. Gidley stated City Council negotiates directly with the
property owners, and an agreement is signed by the owner and
city. He explained £urther.
Commissioner JOHNSON asked if the intent of the program was that
funds reba~ted would be utilized £or 3mprovements to
in£rastructure? He wondered where the funds were going.
Mr. Gidley explained how the program can be utilized £or anything
exterior in which public good would be derived. For eaample,
improvement to the £acades of buildings, parking lot lighting,
landscaping.
Commissioner LANGDON asked approximately what date the maximum
rebate amount would be achieved at the shopping center.
t~tr. Gidley stated he estimated the owners of the shopping center
would receive the maximum amount allowed by the end o£ this year.
Mr. Gidley reiterated to Commission that their responsibility was
to make a recommendation on the timinn o£ necessary improvements.
City Counc3l must determine where £unds will come from.
Mjke Lewis, 3812 Wright Court said he was in agreement with the
closure of Wright Court.
,,,,. ,_ Mr-_ _ C ~. R_ B~~nti.a,,. ;,12531 West 35th Avenub was sworn • in. He stated
he represented 16 persons living east oE the center. The main
concerns he mentioned were noise and trash.
Anthonv Ver.chi_arel.li, 12395 West 35th Avenue was sworn in. He
stated most o£ his complaints had been mentioned by other
speakers. He suggested ~hat the request be,denied until all
issues are addressed.
Jerrv Bi.eh]., 11115 West 38th Avenue had been previously sworn in.
Mr. Biehl stated he had made a commitment to v,+ork with the city
in order to resolve the drainage probiems. The drainage problems
cannot be solved, however unti2 an interceptor line in West 38th
Avenue is available. Referencing the anticipated traffic
problems, he stated they would be £lexible and if traffic
patterns needed to be changed or altered, they would do tha~.
Commissioner LANGDON asked Mr. Biehl how much time would be lost
regarding the planned addition, should Planning Commission denp
the request.
~ ~
Planning Comm3ssion Minutes _ Page 8
April 21, 1994 _ _ _-
Mr_ Siehl stated it could mean six to 12 months' delay.
Commissioner LANGDON asked why it would take so long
Mr_ Biehl stated he couldn't understand why the request would be
delayed, since they had been working with the city all along.
Commissioner LANGDON stated_that according to the staP£ report,
many questions have been left unanswered. He wondered if the
best time to correct the deficiencies was now. Would denying the
request aid the process? _
Mr. Gidley answered the-city could not ask the developer to.
"design a tub" when the city cannot presently provide an outlet.
He thought Capital Improvement funds might be available in 1994
that could be utilized. Mr. Gidley noted that this project is
not on any Capital Improvement plan at this time. He stated it
would do no good to deny the request.
Commissioner LANGDON spoke o£ his.desire that the multiple
problems surrounding this proposed addition could be resolved
without disrupting the project.
Mr_ R;_ahl stated until there is a collection line constructed in
West 38th Avenue he could not continue with a drainage plan.
Vice Chairman ECKHARDT recapped the ma~or concerns.
Commissioner CERVENY moved that Case No. WZ-94-4, an application _
by General Management Company for approval of an amendment to the
Planned Commercial De~elopment final development plan for the
„ Applewood Village_5hopping Center located at approximately 3600-
Stoungfieid Street be forwarded to Ci-ty Council with a
recommendation for Approval based on the £ollowing findings and
with the recommendations as set £orth in the staf£ report Section
5 and with the following conditions:
1. in con~unction with the development, city address the proper
drainage £rom the shopping center and proper traffic control
for the neighborhood.
In connection with Section 5, Commissioner CERVENY did not go
through the section in detail, but as printed, made the following
additions:
A. 2. Regarding the building addition exterior renovation, that
be left up to coordination between the property owner,
Wal-Mart and the city;
A. 3. Regarding the freestanding sign, that be le£t up to an
agreement between the City, Wal-Mart and center owner;
~
~
Planning Commission Minutes Page 9
April 21, 1994
(A) 4.b.Regarding interior circixlation, a traffic study be
provided to City Council that would address concerns o£
traf£ic problems the addition might create within the
shopping center.
(A) 6. Regarding landscaping of parking end caps, coordinate
with City, owner and Wal-Mart.
Commissioner LANGD~N made a£riendly amendment that Section V B.
the phrase "owner o£ shopping center sometime in the near future"
be changed to "owner o£ shopping center sometime in the immediate
future".
Mr. Gidley stated that could be tied to the issuance of a
building permit.
Mr. aiPh~ requested that it be tied to a construction year.
Mr. Gidley stated that if a building permit is issued in 1995,
these improvements would also be constructed in 1995. The
Certi£icate of Occupancy would be issued only when'improvements
have been designed and construction started.
Commissioner JOHNSON suggested an amendment to Commissioner
LANGDON's friendly amendmen~t that the recommendations be approved
at the issuance of a building permit and be completed by the time
the Certi£icate of Occupancy is issued.
Commissioner CERVENY further e~cplained that his motion stated
referencing the timing of the improvements, the traffic and
drainage would be addressed by City Council and taken care of at
„ the time the improvement.was c.oming through, .
Commissioner JOHN50N stated he wanted to put a time frame on 3t.
Commissioner LANGDON agreed to the amendment to his friendly
amendment.
Commissioner JOHNSON seconded Commissioner CERVENY's motion.
Commissioner JOHNSON restated his friendly amendment that the
conditions (regarding improved drainage and tra£fic) be required
at the time the permit is issued and be completed by the
Certificate of Occupancy is issued.
Vice Chairperson ECKHARDT paraphrased the motion.
Commissioner CERVENY added that as a condition improved drainage
and tra£fic problems i.e., Wright Court and the west exit at West
38th Avenue be (as Commissioner JOHNSON stated) addressed at the
time of approval by Ci-ty Council and required to be completed by
~ ~
Planning Commission Minutes Page 10
April 21, 1994
the time of Certificate of Occupancy. He added that the property
is within the City of Wheat Ridge and all notification and
posting requirements have been met, therefore there is
jurisdiction to hear this case.
Mr. Gidley stated that the public improvements time frame issue
was not controlled by the applicant, but by City Counoil. He
doubted that Commission could make that a condition. It could be
made a recommendation to City Council, however.
, Commissioner CERVENY agreed that this was a recommendation and
not a requirement. Motion carried 5-0.
Vice Chairperson ECKHARDT called a short recess. Meeting
reconvened at 10:05 p.m.
2. Case No. zOA-94-3: A proposal to amend Wheat Ridge Code
o£ Laws, Chapter 26. Zoning Code relating to right of
legal protest for Special Use Permits and Day Care
Centers as Special Uses within residential and
agricultural zone districts.
Mr. Gidley informed Commission that this case had been referred
by City Council as a legislative proposal. He passed around a
copy o£ the proposed Council Bill. He rev3ewed his memo
summarizing the proposed changes.
Commissioner CERVENY asked i£ the proposed regulations were
consistent with most other communities?
Mr. Gidley stated yes, it is. He added that the chart, in one
area, is-misieading in that with day care centers and small day
care centers the chart states that they were not allowed in
residential zone districts prior to Ordinance 945. However, they
werP allowed as an accessory use to a church.
Commissioner CERVENY asked if they were allowed as a freestanding
Pacility.
Mr. Gidley stated no.
Commissioner CERVENY asked for further explanation of a"legal
protest".
Mr. Gidley did so.',
Commissioner LANGDON asked Mr. Gidley if this change would
accomplish anything.
Mr: Gidley stated he believed it would. He explained that he
believes it is a better proCess than rezoning. He added he
thought more control would be maintained by leaving the zoning as
i
,;ASE NO: WZ-94-4
APPLICANT(S) NAME:
OWNER(S) NAME:
REQUEST:
APPROXIMATE AREA:
~
CERTIFICATION OF RESOLUTION
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION
LOCATION:
General Management Company
Same.
3600 Young£ield-Street
Approval of an amendment to a final development plan
29.9 acres
WHEREAS, the City of Wheat Ridge Planning Division has submitted a list of
factors to be considered with the above request, and said list o£ £actors
is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and made a part
hereo£; and
WHEREAS, there was testimony received at a public hearing heard by the
Planning Commission and such testimony provided additional facts.
NOW, THEREFORE, based upon the facts presented and conclusions reached, it
was moved by Commissioner CERVENY, seconded by Commissioner JOHNSON, that
Case No.. WZ-94-4, a application by General Management Company for approval
o£ an amendment to the Planned Commercial Development £inal development
plan £or the Applewood Village Shopping Centez, located at approximately
~600 Young£ield Street, be forwarded to City Council with a recommendation
~r Approval based on the following findings and recommendations:
1. The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all noti£ication
and posting requirements have been met, therefore there is ~urisdiction
to hear this case.
2. a. Regarding the garden center, in addition to the iron £encing shown,
„ some,ad~lit7-onal,view-obscuring screening should be usad_along_the
north and east sides.
b. Lighting should be designed to prohibit direct glare and/or excess
light bleed onto the properties to the north and east.
c. No outside loudspeakers or audio broadcast systems shall be used.
3. ' Regarding the building addition and exterior renovation, we recommend
that sta££ work with Wal-Mart and the owner to try to achieve the
architectural treatment, including'color and use of gable facades that
matches that of the building which extends to the south.
4. Sta£P shouid work with Wal-Mart and the owner to try to insure that the
proposed freestanding sign include the Applewood Shopping Center ,
design element used on other signs in the Center.
5. Regarding parking lot and street access and street improvement issues:
a. Extension of a sidewalk along West 38th Avenue to the east will be
required and handicapped access shall be provided into the
development from West 38th Av~nue.
~ ~
CertiPicate of Resolution Page 2
Case No. WZ-94-4/General Management Co.
j b. The applicant prepare a traffic study to be provided to City
Council that would address concerns of traffic and interior
vehicular circulation problems.
6. Staff should work with the owner and Wal-Mart so that all parking ends
be landscaped and that the transition of the building £ront drive at
the south end oP Wal-Mart be improved in design.
7. There are existing (historic) drafnage problems that the shopping
center has caused £or the surrounding residential areas. Planning
Commission recommends that the owner and the City work together in the
near future to correct'those drainage problems. Those £acilities that
would be located on private property would be the owner's financial
responsibility, whereas those beyond the private property boundaries
would be the City's responsibility. Timing o£ on-site drainage
improvements should correspond to the City's project, however
engineering design and financial commitment should coincide with
building permit issuance for this expansion and a Certificate of
Occupancy should not be issued until such has happened.
8. Vehicular circulation coming from the south (West 32nd Avenue) is very
poorly designed. Staf£ has sketched a possible solution that would
provide more structured channelization, packet Exhibit 'A'. The
shopping center owner should work with the City to make such
improvements in the near future.
. The neighbors to the north have requested a sound wall and closure of
Wright Court. Council should approve funding o£ this pro3ect to
coincide with the Wal-Mart expansion.
10. There needs to be. a le£t turn-in land (west bound) at the easterly curb
cut. The City should re-stripe West 38th Avenue with this expansion.
11. The City..should study the possible elimination of t~e free.right turn
at the intersection of Youngfield and West 38th Avenue; thus increasing
the corner land area £or landscape improvements. According to the
Public Works Department, this configuration may contribute to the,
con£usion at this intersection.
VOTE: YES: Eckhard~, Cerveny, Langdon, Crumpton and Johnson
NO: None
I, Sandra Wiggins, Secretary to the City of Wheat Ridge Planning
Commission, do hereby and herewith certify that the foregoing Resolution
was duly adopted by a 5-0 vote of the members present at their regular
meeting held in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Buiiding, Wheat
Ridge, Colorado, on the 21st day of April, 1994.
'i% ~"v~~
~~ -P~~ ~ 'ur,~ ' -
Robert Eckhardt, Vice Chairperson Sandra Wiggins,~ retary "
~'iEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION
~.pc>resowz944
.. , ~ ~
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the
City of Wheat Ridge City Council on May 23, 1994 at 7:00 p.m. at 7500
West 29th-Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. ~71 interested citizens are
inv3ted to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments.
The £ollowing petition shall be heard:
1. wZ-94-4: An application by General Management Company for
approval of an amendment to the Planned Commercial Development
£inal development plan for the Applewood Village Shopping Center
located at approximately 3600 YoungPield Street. Said property
is legally described as follows:
PARCEL 1
A PORTION OF THE EAST ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION
29, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 654.32 FE~T NORTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF
THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29, AND 60.00 FEET EAST OF
THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF
SAID SECTION 29; THENCE N 00~51.8' W PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF THE
EAST ONE-HALE OF THE NORTH[nTEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29, A
DISTANCE OF 667.82 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE ~F THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER
OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29, THEN N 89~28.1' E
ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST
ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29, A DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET; THENCE N
00~51.8' W PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST ONE-HALF OF THE
NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29, A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET;
THENCE S 89~28.1' W PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-
QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29, A DISTANGE OF
150.00 FEET; THENCE N 00~51.8' W PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST
ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29, A DISTANCE
OF 135.19 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE ON A CURVE TO TAE RIGHT
WHOSE RADIUS IS 182.00 FEET AND WHOSE CHORD BEARS N 37~51.1' E, A
DISTANCE OF 227.66 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE N 76~34.0' E
ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF WEST 38TH AVENUE, A DISTANCE OF 701.69
FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF RIDGEVIEW ACRES THIRD FILING, A
PLATTED SUBDIVISION IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF JEFFERSON COUNTY,
COLORADO; THENCE S 00~43.5' E ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID RIDGEVIEW
ACRES THIRD FILING, A DISTANCE OF 670.33 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE
NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF TIiE NORTHWEST ONE~QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29;
THENCE S 89~28.1' W ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER
DF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29, A DISTANCE OE 0.67
FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS 885.00 FEET EAST OF THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST
ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29; THENCE S
00~51.8' E PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST ONE-fiALF OF THE
NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29, A DISTANCE OF 1162.99 FEET
TO A POINT 160.00 EEET NORTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-
QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29; THENCE S 89~31.7' W PARALLEL TO TFiE SOUTH
LINE OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29, A DISTANCE OF
192.34 FEET; THENCE 500~51.8' E PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST
~ ~
ONE-HALF OF Tf3E NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29, A DISTANCE
OF 130.00 FEET; THENCE S 89~31.7' W PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE
NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29, A DISTANCE OF 342.66 FEET TO
A POINT 350.00 FEET EAST OF THE WEST LINE OF TI-IE EAST ONE-HALF OF THE
NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29; THENCE N 00~51.8' W PARALLEL
TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF
SAID SECTION 29, A DISTANCE OF 600.00 FEET; THENCE S 89~31.7' W
PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF'THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID
$ECTION 29, A DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET; THENCE N 00~51.8' W PARALLEL TO
THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF
SAID SECTION 29, A DISTANCE OF 24.32 FEET; THENCE S 89°31.7' W
PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 29,
A DISTANCE OF 140.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING
AN AREA 29.969 ACRES MORE OR'LESS.
ATTEST:
Sandra Wiggins, Secretary
Wanda Sang, City Clerk
To be Published: May 3, 1994
Wheat Ridge Sentinel
<pc>pnzoa943/wz944
~
7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE
P.O. BOX 638
WHEAT RIDGE. CO 80034-0638
City Admin. Fax # 234-5924
May 20, 1994
Dear Area Resident:
(303) 234-5900
Police Dept. Fax k 235-2949
~
The City of
GWheat
~Ridge
This letter is in regard to the proposal £or a 25,000 square foot
addition to the Wal-Mart Store within the Applewood Village
shopping Center at West 38th Avenue and Youngfield.
Planning Commission approved the request for expansion of the
store at a public hearing held on April 21, 1994. The £inal
public hearing has been scheduled be£ore City Council on June 13,
1994.
There are still outstanding issues of concern to the neighborhood
which staf£ would like to resolve prior to the City Council
hearing. As such, we would like to invite you to attend another
neighborhood meeting to continue discussion regarding the
proposal. The meeting is scheduled £or May 31, 1994 at 7:00 p.m.
and will be held at Ridgeview Baptist Church, located at 3810
Young£ield Street.
Once again, representatives from the Planning and Development
Department, the Public Works Department and the City
Administrator's office will attend the meeting as well as
representatives from the Applewood Village Shopping Center.
Should you have questions about the meeting or the proposed
expansion, do not hesitate to contact me at 235-2848.
Sincerely,
~~~G'~-~2 ~z~-c~-~ ~?~~'.~'
Meredith Reckert
Planner
MR:slw
Ci RorvrlrAP~ya~r
_ • ; - -~
~
, -~OD WES7 29TH AVENUE ~ ~
°.o. BDx s38
4'lHEAT RIDGE. ~O 60034-0638
,3031234-5500
C',ty Admin, rax ~ 234-59?4 Police Deot. Fax # 235-2G49
May 26, 1994
This is to in£orm you that Case No.
The C~ty of
~1Vheat
~Ridge
w~-9a-a which is a
request £OT ~nnrnval of an a~gendmant tn +Fy~lawti~A Rhnnnin~
~'an+cr fi nal rlovcl nnmon+- r+l an
£or property located at ~nn Vnnnrtfia~r' R1-YPPF
will be heard by
the Wheat Ridge r;+<r ~'ni+nr~ i in the Council Cham6ers
of the Municipai Compiex, 75~0 West 29th Avenue at 7:00 p.m. ,
OII ~Tiina 1 "3 _ 1 q9fl
All owners andJor their legal counsel of the parcel under
consideration m~~st be present at this hearing before the
r;+v rn,,.,n; l
As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to
attend this Public Hearing and/or suHmit written comments. It
shall be the applicant's responsibility to notify any other
pezsons whose presence is desired at this meeting.
If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please
contact the Planning Division. Thank you.
PLANNING DIVISION
<pc>phnoticePorm
C~ r,~, .. r,,,,,~,~
_...:.~i *
* ~
Dear Adjacent Property Owner:
If you have received this notice, you reside os own property
adjacent to a property involved in a land use case being
processed by the City of Wheat Ridge.
This notice is intended to inform you of the process involved in
land use development applications.
Prior to application for rezoning or special use permit, the
developer is responsible for holding an informal neighborhood
meeting, The purpose of the meeting is to provide the
opportunity for citizens to become aware of a proposed
development in their neignborhood and to allow the developer to
respond to citizen concerns in the design of their project. All
residents within 600 feet are required to be notified of the
meeting.
A sta££ planner will attend the meeting to discuss City policy
and regulatfons and the process involved, however, the planner
will remain impartial regarding viability o£ the project.
Keep in mind that this is not a public hearing. Although a
synopsis of the meeting will be entered as testimony, it is the
public hearings in £ront o£ Planning Commission and City Council
where decisions are renderecl. If you want input in the decision-
makfng process, it is imperative that you attend the public
hearings.
The public hearings you will be attending are quasi-judicial in
nature. Please do not contact your Planning Commissioners or
Council people to discuss the merits of a case prior to the
public hearing. It could jeopardize your representatives'
ability to hear the case.
I£ you'are an adjacent property, you may have the right to File a
"legal protest" against the application. The result o£ this
£iling is that it requires a 3/4 majority of City CounciY to
approve a request.
If you have questions regarding any of the in£ormation given
above, do not hesitate to.contact a planner at the City offices
by caliing 235-2846. The Planning & Development Department is
open Monday through Friday 8:34 a.m. through 5:00 p.m.
<pc>adjpropowner
~ ~
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION
STAFF REPORT
TO: City Council Date Prepared: June 3, 1994
Date of Meetiag: June Z3, 1994 Case Manager:~eredith Reckert
Case No, & Name: WZ-94-4/Wal-Mart
Action Requested: Approval o£ an amendment to a final
development pian
Location of Request: 3600 Youngfield Street
Name/Address of gpplicant(s): General Nanagement Company
13900 E Harvard Avenue
Aurora CO 80014
Name/Address of Owner{s): Same
Approximate Area: 29.9 acres
Present Zoning: Planned Commercial Development
Present Land Use: Retail
Surrounding Zoning: Nz R-1; Si R-2, RC-1, R-C; E: R-2, R-lA,
RC-1; W• I-70
Surrounding Land Use: ~ church, low density residential; ~
commercial, low ~ensity residential; E:
low density resic'.ential; NT: T-70
Comprehensive Plan for Area: Commerciak.ACtivity Center
Date Published: May 3, 1994
Date to be Posted: May 30, 1994
Date Legal Notices Sent: May 26, 1994
Agency Check List (XX) Attached () Not required
Related Correspondence ( ) Attached (XX) None
-- -- ------------------------------------------
ENTER INTO RECORD:
(XX) Comprehensive Plan (XX) Case Fi1e & Packet Materials
(XX) Zoning Ordinance (XX) Slides
Subdivision Regulations (XX) Exhibi~s
JURISDICTION:
The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all
notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore
there is jurisdiction to hear this case.
~ ~
City Council Staf£ Report Page 2
Case No. WZ-94-4/Wal-Mart
2. REOUEST
The applicant requests approval of an amendment to the Applewood
Village Shopping Center £inal development p3an.
II. SITE PLAId
The purpose of the proposed amendmerit is to £acilitate the expansion
of the existing Wal-Mart store on the nortlzern portion of the shopping
center.
Wal-Mart currently has around 105,000 square feet of interior store
space plus the existing fenced garden area on the north end of the
store. The existing development plan shows 6,000 square £eet o£ -
£enced garden area, hbwever, this area has been expanded throughout
the years.
The amendment proposes a 22,219 square foot expansion to the north, a
3700 square foot enclosed garden center and 14,700 square feet of
outdoor garden center. A ten-foot-high wrought iron fence will
surround the garden area. The vestibule at the £ront will be
increased to 9,000 square feet in size and the loading dock on the
east side in the alley will be enclosed. The easteTnmost curb cut on
West 38th Avenue will be moved to the west. The brick building at the
northeast corner of the site will be demolished to accommodate the
expansion.
With the proposed addition, the shopping center would have 27~
building coverage, 62$ parking coverage and 9~ landscaped coverage.
The shopping center as a whole has adequate parking.
III. NEICHSnRHnI]D MF.F,TING
Meetings for neighborhood input were held on April 5, 1994 and May 31,
1994.
Concerns expressed included the following:
Garden center screening
Aesthetics o£ the Wal-Mart store - it needs to be consistent with the
rest o£ the center
Outdoor loudspeakers used in the garden center
Closure of the branch post office
Drainage problems created on W 35th Avenue,
Wright St area north of the center
Runoff from the center into the irrigation
The RTD bus terminus on the property
The confusion £or vehicular tra££ic at the
intersection
W 3Sth Avenue and the
ditch
Youngfield/38th/2-70
Operational concerns regarding on-site trash
Semi-trailers and shipping boxes on the property
On-site vehicular circulation
~ ~
City Counc3l Staff Report Page 3
Case No. WZ-94-4/Wal-Mart
IV. AGENCY REFERRALS
Ai1 outside agencies can serve the property.
Public Works is requesting that drainage on the property be col].ected
and conveyed to a future storm sewer placed in West 38th Avenue. They
have agreed to re-stripe West 38th Avenue to accommodate a lePt-hand
turn into the property. The free right-hand turn £rom Young£ield onto
West 38th Avenue may be eliminated and related tra£fic control
improvements made to the intersection.
V. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIAN
Planning Commission this request at a public hearing held on April 21,
Z994. A recommendation of Approval was mad'e with the £ollowing
findings and recommendations:
1, The property is within the City o£ Wheat Ridge, and all
notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore
there is jurisdiction to hear this case.
2. a. Regarding the garden center, in addition to the iron fencing
shown, some additional view-obscuring screening should be
used along the north and east sides.
b. Lighting should be designed to prohibit direct glare and/or
excess light bleed onto the properties to the north anc3 east.
c. No outside loudspeakers or audio broadcast systems shall be
used.
3. Regarding the building addition and exterior renovation, we
recommend that staf£ work with Wal-Mart and the owner to try to
achieve the architecturai treatment, including color and use o£
gable £acades that matches that of th~.building which extends to
the south.
4. StaPf should work with Wal-Mart and the owner to try to 3nsure
that the proposed £reestanding sign include the Applewood
Shopping Center design element used on other signs in the Center.
5. Regarding parking lot and street access and street improvement
issues:__
a. Extension of a sidewalk along West 38th Avenue to the east
will be required and handicapped access shall be provided
into the development from West 38th Aveaue.
b. The applicant prepare a tra££ic study to be provided to City
Council that would address concerns of traffic arzd interiar
vehicular circulation problems.
6. Staff should work with the owner and Wal-Mart so that all parking
ends be landscaped and that the transition of the building front
drive at the south end of Wal-Mart be improved in design.
~ ~
City Council S'taff Report Page 4
Case No. WZ-94-4/Wal-Mart
7. There are existing (h3storic) drainage problems that the shopping
center has caused for the surrounding residential areas. Planning
Commission recommends that the owner and the City work together in
the near future to correct those drainage problems. Those
facilities that would be located on private property wou7.d be the
owner's Einancial responsibility, whereas those beyond the private
property boundaries would be the City's responsibility. Timing o£
on-site drainage improvements should correspond to the City's
project, however engineering design and...financial commitment
shou7.d coincide with building permi~E issuance for this expansion
and a Certificate o£ Occupancy should not be issued until such has
happened.
8. Vehicular circulation coming from the south (West 32nd Avenue} is
very poorly designed. Staff has sketchecl a possible solution
that would provide more structured channelization, packet Exhibit
'A'. The slzopping center owner should work with the City to make
such improvements in the near £uture.
9. The neighbors to the north have requested a sound wa11 and closure
o£ Wright Court.' Counail should approve funding o£ this project
to coincide with the Wal-Mart expansion.
1Q. There needs to be a 2eft turn-ir~ land (west bound) at the easterly
curb cut_ The City should re-stripe W~~st 38th Avenue with this
expansion.
11. The City should study the possible elimination of the £ree right
turn at the intersection of Youngfield and West 38th Avenue; thus
increasing the corner land area for landscape imprbvements.
According to the Public Works DepartmEnt, this configuration may
contribute to ~he con£usion at this intersection.
In regard to the recommendations made by Planning Commission Staff has
the Pollowing comments:
Item 2a. Aclditional screening material will be placed on the inside
of the fence.
Item 2b. A note has been added prohibiting outside lighting glare to
the east and north.
Item 2c. A note has been added prohibiting outside loudspeakers in
the garden area.
Item 3. The applicant has agreed to match the entire Wal-Mart to
colors but not to architectural features (i.e., gables)
used throughout the center.
Item 4. The £reestanding sign has been redesigned to match center
design elements.
Item 5a. A sidewalk will be extended to the east along West 38th
Avenue.
Item 5b. A traffic engineering consultant has been retained and will
address this issue at the Council meeting. Staff has
discussed severa7. options with the owner. He would prefer
~ ~
City Council Staff Report Page 5
Case No. WZ-94-4/Wal-Mart
to develop the parking lot as proposed, with no midpoint
drive. If the traf£ic patterns demand such a eonnection,
then he would create the drive connection.
Item 6. The owner doesn't want to extend irrigation lines to the
middle of the parking lot to sustain the landscaping. He
indicates that i£ the City recnnstructs the West 38th
Avenue/Young£ield intersection as proposed, he will
landscape the corner area.
Item 7. The City has agreed to undertake a capital improvements
project in West 38th Avenue to install a storm sewer to
transport storm drainage to Clear Creek. The developer
will install an interceptor in the alley and hook into the
new line in West 38th Avenue.
Item 8. The owner and staf£ are ~ointly working on a solution to
this problem, however, it is unrelated to this request.
Item 9. As part of the storm sewer project, the City will build a
sound barrier along the north side o£ West 38th Avenue.
Wright Court will be closed to northbound traffic o£f of
West 38th Avenue.
Item 10. The City will re-stripe West 38th Avenue to have an
eastbound left-hand turn lane into the center.
Item 11. The £ree righ~ hand turn £rom northbound Youngfield to West
38th Avenue will be replaced with a controlled stop.
VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS _ _ _
There are three di£ferent types of issues which have been raised
regarding this request.
A. Those issues that directly relate to this proposed expansion which
sta£f expects and recommends are to be accomplished by_Wal-Mart
and/or the owner o£ the shopping center;
B. Recommendations that relate to the shopping center as a whole
and some off-site impacts and issues that sta£f e~ects and
recommends are accomplished by the owner o£ the shopping center at
some time in the near future; and
C. Those issues and concerns which the City, through the Capital
Improvement Program, should accomplish at some time in the near
future.
A. PLAN SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Regarding the building addition and exterior renovation,
sta£f recommends that the architectural treatment, including
color and use of gable facades match that of the building
which extends to the south.
2. Regarding parking lot and street access and street
improvement issues, it is recommended that an additional main
drive be provided toward the western side. There currently
is a drive going, south £rom the westerly curb cut. That
~ ~
City Council 5ta££ Report Page 6
Case No. WZ-94-4/Wal-Mart
drive could be curved to align with the drive behind
Blockbuster, or it could remain as is.
B. LARf;ER SHOPPING CENTER ISSUES
1. There are existing (historic) drainage problems that the
shopping center has caused for the surrounding residential
areas. Staff recommends that the owner and the City work
together to correct those drainage problems. Those facilities
that would be located on private property wouid be the owner's
£inancial responsibility, whereas those beyond the private
property boundaries would be the City's responsibility.
Timing af on-site drainage improvements should correspond to
the City's project.
2. Vehicular circulation coming from the south (West 32nd
Avenue) is very poorly designed. Staff has sketched a
possible solution that would provide more structured
channelization. See attached Exhibit 'A'. Staff will
continue to work toward a solution with the owner.
C. S=TY ISSUE,~
1. The neighbors to the north have requested a sound wall
and closure of Wright Coust. Staff will approach Council £or
approval and funding o£ this pro~ect.
2. There needs to be a le£t turn-in lane (west bound) at
the easterly curb cixt. The City will re-strip West 38th
Avenue.
3. The City may eliminata the free right turn at the
intersection of Youngfieid and West 38th Avenue; thus
inoreasing the corner land area for landscape improvements.
This con£iguration contri.butes to the con£usion at this
intersection.
4. On-site drainage needs to be properly collected and
conveyed via a storm sewer system. Those portions o£ the
system that are beyond the shopping center boundaries wi11 be
recommended to City Council for Capital Improvement Program.
Although the details have not been worked out, a storm sewer
system would be installed in West 38th Avenue running north
and dumping into Clear Creek. If this concept is approved by
City Council, it would most likely occur next summer.
RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move that Case No. WZ-94-4, a request by
General Management Company for approval o£ an amendment to a Final
Devel.opment P1an for the Applewood Shopping Center Planned Commercial
Deve7.opment be approved, based upon the following findings and
conditions as stated:
~ ~
City Council Staff Report
Case No. WZ-94-4/Wal-Mart
Findi.ngs :
1. There is ~urisdict3on £or the City to consider
2. All agencies indicate that they can serve the
3. All requirements of the Zoning Ordinance have
be met based upon the conditions recommended.
Conditions:
Page 7
this request;
proposal; and
been met, or will
1. Regarding the building addition and exterior renovation, the
architectural treatment, including colors snd use of mansard roo£
and gables shall match that of the building which extends to the
south.
2. Regarding the parking lot western access £rom West 38th Avenue,
that a circulation drive be maintained through the parking Tot as
recommended by staff.
3. Regarding drainage, that the owner be prepared to construct or
pay the City £or construction of, drainage £acilities within the
shopping center that will connect to the City's storm sewer
system in West 38th Avenue, when completed.
4. That staff and the owner continue to work on solving traffic
circulation problems through the shopping center to West 32nd.
Avenue.
<pc>srwz944
w
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: June 13, 1994
Page -~+-
Motian by Mrs. Behm that Case Pio. wz-9u-3, a request for approval af a
rezoning from A-1, .rc-1 and R-2 ta Planned Residential Develapment an~
for approval of .an outline ~evalopment plan for properties located at
10241 West 38th Aven»e, 10150 West 40th Avenue and 3975 Niller Court be
approved for the following reasons:
1. The request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
2. It is compatible with adjacent land ~~se and zoning.
3. The criteria used to evaluate a rezoning support appt~oval of this
request.
With the following conditions in r=gard to the final Development Plan
and Plat stage:
t. The street system should be legally described as an "out-lot traet"
and designate3 fire lane with specific design and maintenanee provisions
specified, inel~~3ing parking restrictions.
2. Resalution of the various agency comments regarding fire and police
access and services, public works comments, planning department
comments, ete. should bP incorporated intc the final plan and plat.
3. ryat a traffic study be 3ane that ad~resses the issue of a single
entrance, impact to the street system an3 the proposed intersection.
Further, the study should investigate the possibility of other access
points.
Zt should not exceed 150 units.
Seconded by Mr. cafanti.
Motion by hir. cdwards to amen3 the motion that it not =xeeed 140 vnits;
seconded by Pirs. Worth; carried 5-3 with Councilmembers Siier, Behm, and
Eafanti vating no.
Original Motion as amended carried 8-0.
Authorization of Capital Improvements in the area of 38th
Avenue and Youngfiel3 Street. ``'~'"`"~
,9r. t4iddaugh explained the need for roa~ .'irainage and othsr ~apital
imp~^ovements and answered Councils yuestians.
t~lr. Edwards wanted noted for the record that he has :iiscussed Item 5.A.
with Mr. Lewis and Mr. Ficco, but not 5.B•, which is quasi-judicial.
After lengttiy-diseussian~MFS. Worth moved to postpone this Item untfl it
could be ~iscussed at a Study Session, and that t•tr. Biehl, the owner of
Applewood Shopping Center, be invited to participate; seconded by Mr.
Edwards; failed 3-5 with~Councilmembers Edwards, Fields, and Worth
voting yes. ~
Mrs. Behm intraduc.ed Item S.A. and ~lerk read the title.
Ralph SantanRelo, 3807 Wright Court, was sworn in by t~e i~layor. He
complimented some of t~e Councilmembers and staff who "ad taken car~e af
many of t`~e problems addressed at neighborhood meetings; he hoped this
cooperation would continue and problems in t;^.e area wovld be resolved,
such as major drainage problems.
~
~~
t "
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES:, June 73, 799u
.
Ken Lewis, 3840 Wright Street, was sworn
the Walmart projeet and drainage projeets
simultaneously.
-~`~i
Pa6e -5-
in by the Mayor; he asked that
be aceomplished
Notion by Mrs. Behm that the City's capital improvement budget be
amended to refleet the addition of $$00,000 af improvements in the a~ea
of 3$th and Youngfield Street in 1994; that improvements to 38th Avenue
between Cody and Kipling be shown no sooner than 1995; and that the
sehaol sidewalk program be altered to reflect projects in 1996 through
1999; I further move that the 199~ budget be amended to refleet the
addition of the 38th Avenue and Youngfie2d Street improvements in the
amount of $800,000 and that sueh funds are consi3ered to be appropriated
for u~ilization in the completion of said improvements and that the i944
budget be further amended ta refleet the deletion af 2.4 million dollars
for 3&th Avenue improvements from Cody to Kipling and that such
improvements be ref2ected in the 1995 buQget at the earliest; I further
rnove that the staff be direeted to immediately undertake the design and
construction of capital improvernents in the area of 38th Avenue an@
Youngfield Street as a priority project and camplete sueh projeets as
expeditiously as possible; secon~ed by Mr. Ha11.
Mr. Solano ask4d for an amendment to the motion to take out $15,200.00
from the $800,000.00 to refleet the amaunt for the Hammerhead turn-
around. This was accepted by motion-maker and second.
Motion carrie~ 5-3 with Councilmembers Worth, Edwards, and Fields vating
no.
~ Request for.approval of an amendment to the ~y
S ,,.~~r„ ' ~a, Purpose is for the
sxpansion of tne existing WaI-Mart store.
(Caatinued from May 23, ~994)
i~leredith Reckert presente~ the staff report.
Paul Crabtree, Colorado Land Consultants, Eng7.ewaad, representing
WalMart and the applicant, Gener~al Management Company, was sworn in by
the Mayor. He stated they had been working with staff and worked out
compromises and come ta a good prajeet.
Kathleen KrieRer, Traffzc Engineer, 4090 EsCes Street, was swarn in by
the Mayor; she explained that the expansion af WalMart does not mean an
increase in traffic. She answered Councils questions.
Jerrv Biehl, 11115 W. 38th Avenue, owner of Applewood Shopping Center,
was sworn in by the Mayor and answere~ questians. He has supplied the
City with detailed recor~s as to how the ESTIP money '~as been spent.
The following speakers were sworn in by the Mayor:
Sue Wilsan, 3390 Hol2and Street, representing the owners of the Apple
Gold Gift and Gourmet Shop, asked for approval of the WalMart expansion.
C
CITY COUNCIL MiNUTES: June 13, 1994
t'age -b-
Raloh SantanRe.to, 3801 Wright Court, questioned the number of parking
spaces and the width af at least one aecess point to accomodate bus
t~^affic.
Ken Lewis. 3840 Wright Street, also wondere3 about haw many parking
spaces would be lost; hopes the loudspeaker noise will disappear;
questicned the use of the words "final development plan", maybe it
should be "Iatest devel.apment p1.an"; questl.oned sxactly how big the
extension will be <answer was 22,000 feet); what size is the fence going
to be; public hearing sign was not up at alI times; how da you amend an
Ordinance wit!~out an Or~dinance; (Mr. Niddaugh explained that this matter
did not require an Ordinanae--all Counezl actions do not require an
0~^dinanee; this is nob changing the land use, it is a generic use of ~he
word "zoning"; this wss adopted in 1988; it is a final 3evelopment plan
and_does not require an Ordinance? so2ve drainage problems.
Tonv Ficca, 12425 `r+.
loading zone; can't
has never seen such
came ~~p with a nice
unanswere3.
38th Avenue, can't see ~ars going out inta the bus
see where water is gaing--nothing is show^ on plans;
vague plans; staff ~id a 1ot of work on this and
drai.nage plan, but a lot of questions are.left
Motion by Mrs. Sehm that ~ase No. WZ-94-4, a request by Gsneral
Kanagement Company for approval af an amendment to a rinal Development
Plan for the Applewoo~ Shopping Center Planned eommercial Development be
appraved, based upon the fallowing findings and canditi.ons as stated:
Findin~g~: 1. There is jurisdictian for the City to con'sider this
request; 2. All agencies indicate that they can serve the proposal; and
3. All requirements of the Zaning Ordinance have been met, or will be
met based ~lpon the conditions recommend=d. Conditions: 1. Regaflding
the buil~ing addition and exterior renovation, *_he arohitectural
treatment, iacluding colars and use of mansard roof an:~ gable shall
match that uf t`~e buil~ing which ext=nds to the soutr. 2. Regarding
the parking lot western aecess from S6est 38th Av?n~s, that a cit^cu].atian
drive be maintained through the parking lot as recommende3 by staff. 3.
Regarding drainag?, that the owner be prepared to construet or pay the
City For consti^uetion of, .~rainage facilities within the s'~opping center
that will oonnect to the City's storm sewer system ia West 38th Avenue,
when complet°d; that we have a 3evelopment agreement to take cars af
this; 4. That staff'and the owner continue to wark on solving traffie
circulation problen~s through the shopping center to iiest 32nd Avenue;
seeonded by ~tr, Eafanti. After ~iscussion 1~Irs.'Behm removed Condition
2. from her motion; second aocepted this.
Motian by A7r. ~dwards to postpone t:~is Item until the next meeting
because more questionshave been raised than answere~~! dur^ing this
hearing; seconded by Nrs. Worth; carried 5-3 with Councilmembers Hall,
Eafanti, and Behm voting no.
Motion by Mr. Hall to suspend the Rules an~ continue this meeting until
tomor~row at 7:00 p.m. It is now 1:05 a.m., tempers are getting short,
p~ople have to go work the next morning; ,econded by ?irs. Behm; fazled
6-2 with Councilmembers Hall and Behm voting yes.
~ ~
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Bob Middaugh, City Administrator
FROM: WNieredith Reckert, Planner
RE: Case No. WZ-94-4
DATE: June 21, 1994
Please let__this memorandum serve as a follow-up to questions
raised by City Council regarding parking for the Applewood
Shopping Center.
Total gross building coverage on the property would be 375,684
square £eet, Parking ratios for retail space are figured based
on net building coverage which i.s 85$ of gross or, in this case,
319,331 square feet. The required parking £or shopping areas
over 100,000 square feet is one space for every 250 square feet
o£ net or 1277 parking spaces £or the entire center. If the
£enced garden area is included the numbes o# required spaces is
increased to 1327. Total spaces provided are 1598.
If the Wal-Mart store was considered separately the £ollowing
figures would apply: 137,,869 sq. ft. of gross building area
X.85
117,188 sq. £t. o~ net area
117,188 sq. ft.
= 25Q
468 spaces required
If the fenced garden area is included ttie number of required
spaces is increased to 518.
The number o£ spaces provided in Pront of Wal-Mart store = 579.
Please note that the statistics provided on revised sheet 1
(attached) do not use the 85~ net square footage rule.
MR:slw
attachment
<pc>mrmem621
~ , . ~.
.~
AGFsNDA ITEM RECAP
--4UAS2-JUDICIAL X
Yes No
_ PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY ADM. MATTERS ELEC. OFFZCIALS MATTERS
PROC.-/CEREMONIES CITY ATTY. MATTERS ORDINANCES FOR 15T READING
BIDS/MOTZONS LIQUOR HEARINGS ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING
_ INFORMATION ONLY _ pUBLIC COhIlNENT X RESOLUTIONS
AG$NDA ITEM TITL&e A Resolution authorizing closure of West 35th Avenue
west of Wright Street.
STJNaSARY/RECOI~II~SENDATION: Neighbors in the vicinity of West 35th Avenue
and Wright Street have complained of truck traffic servicing Applewood
Shopping Center and have asked for this closure. No property would be
denied access to a public street. Emergency access will be retained.
Staff recommends appr6val.
AJ."1"AI:lYC1L'"1V'.LS :
1) Resolution No.
2)
3)
MOTION:
I move that Resolution No
BIIDGETED, ~ ~
ITEM
Yes No
Fund
Dept/Acct #
Budgeted Amount S
Requested Expend.5
Requires Transfer% ~ ~
Supp. Appropriation
Yes No
be approved.
~ ~
RESOLUTION No.
Series of 1994
TITLE: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CLOSURE OF WEST 35TH AVENUE
WEST OF WRIGHT STREET
WHEREAS, West 35th Avenue right-of-way terminates approximately one hundred
feet west of Wright Street; and
WHEREAS, only two single family homes access onto West 35th Avenue in this
section; and
WHEREAS, citizens of the immediate area have continuously complained of truck
traffic, coming or going to Applewood Shopping Center and using West 35th Avenue as
a rear access; and
WHEREAS, no property would be denied reasonable access to public streets
should West 35th Avenue be closed to traffic at its' westernmost portion.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City of Wheat Ridge authorizes
clasure of West 35th Avenue approximately one hundred feet west of Wright Street.
Such closure is intended to prohibit regular vehicular travel between West 35th Avenue
and Applewood Shopping Center, however, pedestrian access and emergency vehicle
access shall be maintained. Furthermore, said closure shall be aestheticalfy designed
with landscaping, but designed to allow emergency vehicle access.
DONE AND RESOLVED by a vote of to on this day
of October, 1994.
Dan Wide, Mayor
ATTEST:
Wand Sang, City Clerk
~ AGENDA ITEM RECAP ~
QUASI-JUDICIAL X
Yes No
X PUSLIC HEARINCS CSTY ADM. MATTERS'
PROC./CEREMONIES -C2TY ATTY. MATTERS
BIDS/MOTIONS LIQUOR HEARINGS
INFORMATION ONLY PUBLIC COM2~NT
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Case No. WZ-94-4.
_ ELEC. OFFICIALS MATTERS
-- - ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING
ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READZNG
x RESOLUTIONS
SIIMMARY/RECOMMENDATION: This is a request for approval of aa amendment to t~
Applawood Shopping Center final development plaa. Purpose is fos the espansic
of the esistinq Walmart stose. Staf~ recommends approval with conditions.
ATTACFiMENTS : ~
1) RCM memo w/supplemental info.~
2) J.OSS memo
3J M.Reckert memo
HIIDGETED ~
ITEM: ~ Lx,
Yes No
Fund
Dept/Acct #
Budgeted Amount S
Requested Expend.5
Requires Transfer/ ~ ^
Supp. Appropriation L
Yes No
3IIGGESTED MOTZON:
I move that Case No. WZ-94-4, a request by General Management Company
for approval of an amendment to a Final Development Plan for the Applewoo~
Shopping Center Planned Commercial Development be approved, based upon thf
following findings and conditions as stated:
Findincrs:
1. There is jurisdiction for the City to consider this request;
2. All agencies indicate that they can serve the proposal; and
3. All requirements of the Zoning ordinance have been met, or
will be met based upon the conditions recommended.
Conditions:
1. --That the developer be required and staff be direct,ed and authorized to
enter into a development agreement which at a minimum shall specify:
a. That the developer is obligated to construct storm drainage
improvements consistent with a conceptual plan submitted to the
City council on June 27,1994, and as finally approved by the
City's Engineering Division.
b. That drainage improvements be constructed as part of the City's
contract for drainage on W.38th Ave. and that appropriate costs
be borne by the developer for the on-site drainage improvements.
c. That adequate soil and erosion control measures are provided for
construction activities associated with the Applewood Shopping
Center expansion.
2. That staff and the owner continue to work on solving traffic circulation
problems for the shoppinq center to W. 32nd Avenue.
~ ~o~vnv~
A~pp~roved ~
TO: BOB MIDDAUGH, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: JOHN OSS, SENIOR PROJECT ENGINEER ~
v
RE: APPLEWOOD CENTER DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
DATE: JUNE 22, 1994
Date`~ ;
During the last Council meeting Council and th
expressed concerns about control of drainage,
scheduling of related improvements durinq expansion
Store in the Applewood Shopping Center.
These issues are discussed in detail below:
DRAIDIAGE:
e neighborhood
erosion and
of the Walmart
Council au~horized a major drainage and street improvement
project to address traffic and drainage concerns along West 38th
Avenue and Youngfield Street. This project includes construction
of a 100 year frequency storm event storm sewer system.
The owner of the Center has engaged Lane Enqineering Services to
prepare a drainage report for the entire Center site. This
report will be submitted to the Engineering Division for review
and approval. The report will be prepared in accordance with
UDFCD's Storm Criteria Manual. Expected time of submission of
the final report is the end of July. Final design of the City's
storm system is dependent upon receipt of information from Lane.
Lane has agreed to send preliminary information to the City so
design of the City's storm drainage can proceed.
this memo.
Lane Engineering will also design a drainage system £or the
Center. This system will be sized to accept the 100 year storm
and collect and convey as much of the on site qenerated runoff as
possible to the City's system in West 38th Avenue. The proposed
design will also minimize the amount of storm water that enters
the irrigation ditch that crosses the site. The design of the
system will be reviewed and approved by the Enqineering Division.
A conceptual schematic prepared by Lane Engineering showing
approximate locations of onsite improvements is included with
TIME OF COMPLETION OF THE ON3ITE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
There have been a number of concerns about when the onsite
drainage improvements would be completed. Construction of the
onsite drainage improvements should not be undertaken until the
City's storm system in West 38th Avenue has been constructed and
1
~ i
on the plans as it was presented to the members of the City
Council. Neighbors have had an opportunity to view this fence
elevation in three neighborhood meetinqs. As a result of
discussions with the neighbors, specifia changes were made to the
landscaping between 38th Avenue and the screening fence to provide
for additional landscaping to help soften the impact of the
screening fence. The fence itself is also to be decorati.ve in
nature. No additional changes are suggested on this particular
point.
4. Buildinq Size. There was some confusion in the last City
Council meeting on the precise size of the building expansion. The
actual size of the building and its location relative to 38th
Avenue has not changed on any of the plans which have been
presented to the Planning Commission or to residents. Some
confusion probably originated from an original version of the plan
that did not i2lustrate the dividing line between the expanded
portion of Walmart and the existinq portion of Walmart. In
neighborhood meetings, an attempt was made to estimate the size of
the addition absent a specific dividing line and an improper
estimate may have been made. The current plan shows the dividinq
2ine between the expansion and the existing Walmart store and the
cover page of the plan.sheet has been changed to correctly identify
the square footage involved in the expansion.
5. step Dowa of Buildinq Additioa. At, the Council meeting, a
statement was made that oriqinal plans showed that the building
addition was to be stepped down from the existing store's floor
elevation. A building step ,down has never been discussed or
proposed by the staff or the developer at any point in time. It is
not proposed and is impractical in the retail setting which is the
subject of this particular planning item.
6. Parking. Attached please find a memorandum from the Planning
Division regarding parking requirements for the Walmart expansion.
As indicated, the parking spaces available are sufficient to deal
with the City~s requirements for the expanded area.
A new cover sheet and Council motion has been suggested in light of
the information contained in this memorandum and which is attached.
Approval of the Walmart expansion is recommended.
Respectfully submitted,
~~
Robert C. Middaugh
City Administrator
A627.2
` ~
CITY OF WHEAT RIDG$
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Robert C. Middaugh, City Administratar
SUBJ:
SSOPPING CE2dTER EBPANSION
DATE: June 22, 1994
ON CASE WZ-94-4, APPLEWOOD
At the last meeting of the City Council, the Applewood Shopping
Center expansion was addressed by the members oE the City Council
and continued to the next regular meeting so as to allow the
development o£ supplemental information.
As a result of discussions with the developer and the City staff,
the following information is offered for the City Council's
attention. The items are itemized for simp2icity of review.
1. Draiaage. In discussion with the developer's engineer, we have
agreed to a conceptual drainage plan that is more specific than the
original submission to the members of the City Council. Zn the
attached information from the Engineering Division, members of
Council will notice the conceptual plan that illustrates drainage
to the east of the expansion area as we21 as to the west in the
main parking lot. The drainage issue will be specifically
addressed as to its design and approval in a development agreement
between the engineer and the City which will also incorporate a
provision that the drainage work will be completed as a part of the
City's contract and paid for by the developer. The significance of
including the drainage work in the City's contract is that the work
will then be more closely coordinated with the City's project and
there will be little or no opportunity for it to be done in a
fashion which is otherwise than approved by the City and the City
Council.
2. soil and Erosion Control Measures. Typically the City insures
that adequate soil and erosion control measures are incorporated
into the construction agreements for our projects or for other
projects being constructed in the City of Wheat Ridge. As
Councilmembers will note in the attached information from the
Engineering Division, we are suggesting that a specific provision
in the development agreement be included to address adequate soii
and erosion Control measures. This will alleviate potential
concerns of residents to the north of the shopping center as it
relates to the construction of the various improvements.
3. Gardea Area Fence Elevation. At the City Council meeting, some
concern was expressed regarding the elevation of the fence which is
used to screen the expanded garden area to the north of the Walmart
store. The particular fence elevation has always been represented
7.~;°t ~. ~r ' .'r"°~:~ ~'~'y~~€'~ ~ ,
~ .~'. ., , .. , . .
is ready to accept runoff from the Center. We have discussed
several alternatives" with the owner and have recommended, and he
has agreed, that the onsite drainage improvements be constructed
under the City's construction contract. Costs incurred by the
City for construction administration and onsite improvements will
be borne by the owner. The drainaqe related improvements to the
site should be completed, based upon an early February start, in
April or early May of 1995.
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
Lane Engineering and the Engineer for the Walmart expansion will
be required to prepare erosion and sediment control plans for
the improvements under their areas of responsibility. The
erosion and sediment control plans are required to be prepared in
accordance with UDFCD's Best Management Practices Manual and will
be xeviewed and approved by the Engineering Division.
DEVELOPMENT COVENANT
The issues above will be included in a Development Covenant
between the City and Jerry Biehl, the owner of the Applewood
Shopping Center. Executiori of this document by Mr. Biehl will be
required as part of the review process for the Walmart Expansion.
2
~, s
M E M O'R A N D U M
TO: Bob Middaugh, City Administrator
FROM: ~^~Meredith Reckert, Planner
RE: Case No. WZ-94-4
DATE: June 21, 1994
Please let this memorandum serve as a£ollow-up to questions
raised by City Council regarding parking for the Applewood
Shopping Center.
Total gross building coverage on the property would be 375,684
square £eet. Parking ratios £or retsil space are £igured based
on net building coverage which is 85$ of gross or, in this case,
319,331_square feet. The required parking for shopping areas
over 100,000 square feet is one space £or every 250 square feet
of net or 1277 parking spaces for the entire center. If the
fenced garden area is included the number o£ required spaces is
increased to 1327_ Total spaces provided are 1598.
if the Wal-Mart store was considered separately the foilowing
figures would apply: 137,869 sq. ft. of gross building area
X_$5
117,188 sq. ft. of net area
117,188,sq. ft.
= 250
468 spaces required
If the £enced gasden area is included t2ie number of required
spaces is increased to 518.
The number o£ spaces prov3ded in £ront of Wal-Mart store = 579.
Please note that the statistics provided on rev3sed sheet 1
(attached) do not use the 85$ net square footage rule.
MR:slw
attachment
<pc>mrmem621
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES June 27, 1994 Page -3-
Mr Edwards made a point of order He stated that Mayor Wilde's
comments at the beginning of Public Comment were not appropriate The
chair was only allowed to respond to public comment, but no comment had
been made at that time This was not according to the Council Rules
The statements read by the Mayor may have been his comments and approved
by a majority of City Council, but he certainly was not aware of them
and he didn't think Mrs Worth and Mrs Fields were consulted either
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ORDINANCES ON SECOND READING
, Item 1. Approval for an amendment to a Final Development Plan for the
Applewood Shopping Center Planned Commercial Development
(Case No WZ -94 -4) (General Management Company)
(Continued from June 13, 1994)
Mr Middaugh stated this was a continuation from June 13 and additional
information that had been requested was provided tonight
Ken Lewis 3840 Wright Street, was sworn in by the Mayor, he stated
Council had no jurisdiction to hear the case at this time, the sign
posting was not adequate, signs were down at certain times, questioned
if neighbors had been notified by registered letter, (Mr Gilley stated
that certified letters, return receipt requested, had been mailed to
neighbors) last week nobody from the staff was sworn in before they gave
testimony, including the Mayor, last week's meeting was invalid
Ralph Santangelo 3801 Wright Court, was sworn in by the Mayor, thanked
Council for their approval of the Capital improvements on 38th Avenue
last week, hopes when the addition to the Center is complete, all the
infrastructure will also be complete
Tony Flasco 4440 Reed Street, was sworn in by the Mayor, reminded
Council of procedures on how to amend a Development Plan and read from
the Code of Laws
Tong Ficco 12425 W 38th Avenue, was sworn in by the Mayor, felt it was
difficult to give citizen input since not enough information was
provided by the City Many questions are left unanswered
Motion by Mr Edwards that this process be tabled until this can go back
to the public hearing process through Planning Commission and
establish an ordinance and go through first and second reading of City
Council, seconded by Mrs Worth, carried 6 -2 with Mr Solano and Mr
Hall voting no
Motion by Mr Solano to hold an Executive Session under Section
5 7(R)(1) of the Charter, seconded by Mr F.afanti, carried 8 -0
EXECUTIVE SESSION WAS HELD.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES June 27, 1994 Page -L4-
Motion by Mr Siler to bring the Motion to table Item 1 off the Table,
seconded by Mrs Behm, carried 6 -2 with Mrs Worth and Mr Edwards
voting no
Item 1 was introduced by Mrs Behm, title read by the Clerk Mr Hall
asked that Mr Middaugh go through the information that he had prepared
for Council to answer some of the citizens' questions Mr Middaugh and
Mr Gidley presented the information
Motion by Mrs Behm that Case No WZ -94 -4, a request by General
Management Company for approval of an amendment to a Final Development
Plan for the Applewood Shopping Center Planned Commercial Development be
approved, based upon the following findings and conditions as stated
Findings
1 There is jurisdiction for the City to consider this request,
2 All agencies indicate that they can serve the proposal, and
3 All requirements of the Zoning ordinance have been met, or will be
met based upon the conditions recommended
Conditions
1 That the developer be required and staff be directed and authorized
to enter into a development agreement which at a minimum shall specify
a That the developer is obligated to construct storm drainage
improvements consistent with a conceptual plan submitted to the City
council on June 27, 1994, and as finally approved by the City's
Engineering Division b That drainage improvements be constructed as
part of the City's contract for drainage on W 38th Avenue and that
appropriate costs be borne by the developer for the on -site drainage
improvements c That adequate soil and erosion control measures are
provided for construction activities associate with the Applewood
Shopping Center expansion d That a temporary Certificate of
Occupancy be granted allowing Walmart to occupy and use the Walmart
building upon completion of expansion P That a final Certificate of
Occupancy not be granted until the developer has completed their part of
the drainage project for 38th Avenue and Youngfield and has tied in with
the drainage plan previously approved by Citv Council
2 That the staff and the owner continue to work on solving traffic
circulation problems for the shopping center to W 32nd Avenue
3 The exterior incorporate gables as presented in the Council Meeting
on June 27, 1994, seconded by Mr Siler
Mr Solano asked for an amendment to Section P that we have specific
completion date attached to the Certificate of Occupancy That we add
the words "to bp completed by June 27, 1995" This was accepted as a
friendly amendment
Motion carried 5 -3 with Councilmembers Worth, Edwards, and Fields voting
no Mr Edwards :foes not feel the proper procedure has been followed
Item 2 Council Bill 59 - amending the City - adopted Model Traffic Code
of the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado, to modify the basic rule
regarding speed limits within the city
Council Bill 59 was introduced on second reading by Mr Edwards, title
read by the :lerk, Ordinance No 965 assigned
. Y
t
,~
I ~S
~
October 17, 1994
Paul Crabtree, PE r ~
CLC, Inc.
8480 East Orchard Road
Suite 2000 ~
Englewood, Co 80111 ,
~~ :
r'
RE: ;'Walmar drainage plan
Dea.r Paul,.__ '
~
~~~//~;r I/~\
~~ ~~
I received the latest revision of the drainage plan from Jerry
Biehl late last week and have been reviewing it. The following
are my comments: ,
A: Alley behind Center comments:
1. Please provide a detail of the type 13 inlet showing
dimensions, curb opening where applicable, casting numbers, etc.
We have the same concern about the inlets proposed for use in the
parking lot.
2. What is the capacity of the curb, both 8 inch and 6 inch.
Will the inlets south of West 35th Avenue accept all the runoff
or will there be some carryover that spills into West 35th Avenue
or the inlets to the north of West 35th Avenue.
3. How much of the existing alley do you plan to remove, will
the curb be cast as curb and gutter or placed upon the top of the
concrete slab? What wi11 be the degree of spread in the alley
during the minor and major storms?
4. What will be the contribution to this system from the
splitter in the irrigation ditch? Is there enough capacity in the
proposed pipe for this additional input.
5. Show the correct connection at design point m to the City's
proposed system. Also show the type 13 inlet in the cross pan
and a stubout with elevations. Make sure there is adequate
capacity in the type 13 to accommodate the onsite and street
flows from the landscaped areas along West 38th Avenue to
accommodate the 100 year event. The type 13 inlet in the cross
pan will serve as an overflow for the alley system until the
city's system is constructed. Construction of this feature will
minimize disruption to the alley during construction of the
1
f
~
!
~ ~ ~
.
City~s project.
B: Parking lot comments
1. Please show design contours in front of the Walmart
improvements so we can see where runoff is intended to go.
2. The three type 13 combination inlets located at the south
end of Walmart appear to be area inlets because no curb head is
shown. Is this so?
3. The total outfall from this system is 83 cfs. The total Q's
shown at the several sets of inlets totals 106 cfs.
4. There is a high point about 40 £eet east of the PCR for the
east side of the bus entrartce. Runoff flow5 from there to the
existing entrance. Additional inlets will need to be sited here
to accommodate existinq drainage patterns or the north line of
the lot regraded .to convey runoff to the banks of inlets at the
bus entrance. The inlets shown at the west side of the bus
entrance are located near or at this high point.
5. The inlets shown on the east side of the bus entrance will
only collect a minor part of the runoff that flows north to the
north curb line. The inlet placement is at or near the high
point of the curb line there, also.
6. Show construction of the terminating manhole and a stubout
that extends into West 38th Avenue for this section of. line.
This will minimize disruption to the entrance during construction
o£ the City's project.
7. According to the contour lines presented, the new entrance
will serve as an egress point for drainage from the parking lot.
This is not acceptable.
8. The curb head along the north line is about 4 inches higher
than the pavement surface. This will considerably impact the
capaoity of the combination proposed unless the landsaaping
behind the curb head or the curb head is raised to provide the
required inlet water depth.
9. I reviewed our information relating to the grading across the
bus entrance. Creating a high point at ~least b inches above the
existing pavement to provide adequate depth to contain the runoff
will be very difficult to do and maintain a drivable entrance.
We would like to see some detail work on this matter or another
design alternative looked at.
C: Conclusions:
The results of the runoff calculations for the site are in
general conformance with those we prepared prior to CLC's
involvement in the drainage issue.
t
2
0
STO~ RA R W SH
LA Rt~S
AREA IN4~Y8
. +^'~'~
~
1 Y gTOR~
W Clt WiTK
QG Rt$ 'NLETS
~
s"
_,~..--
~
...-.~..
l~..
< ,,,e-' ''`~ a~~, ~
.~.---' ` ~,~ w-!~
_ _••-~-""'"'~ ; ~
-'„'
....--~~
ww ~
a
P~ ~
~ ;
1~'~
s
~ ~
~
~: 1
.
~.-
~ _
~ ~-
~~~ ~
,
1i «~ ~'°' -
pROPpS~'
Lp ~RALAWI?H
pREA N~ETS
~-,iG.
~~
~~
~ ~
~
~
a~
~<
~n
r ~~~
_ .~... s~,~ , ~
L
~pN ~EPT ~ MpRpV EMENTEN -~ER
S~ORM pRAI
APP L~'w~~D v
~
NA~,E ~N~PP~N~ G
` L~ A~ E ,~~y~ ~ 1994
PgEPAREQNO G78-~
p~Q~~CT
~ .
: PROAOSEO
STORMI ~RAIN
• LATERAL WITH
BATTERIES OF
AREA INI.ETS
~- -- _ -
: 19 1 ~~ .
. l '1
~ .~
•
~~~ ~~~~~
~
NEW CITY STOP
ORAIN WITH
CURB INLETS
r-''T ~-~
w~t wRt
4
~
~
~.
~ •'
'
..
~
. ~ *_'
j ~w au,~
1 '
~~~~~
WIFT~et , wKY~E p
IYW ~
s H
u/
~
~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~~ -- ~-
. r~ / ~~~ ~
/ ~ ~c~ ~ a ]` J
'~ ~ ~ ~ c~ ~
~~ a~.a J m n a`°~ 1 ~ ~y ~ c
v~ ~v a~ c v~ v~ ' ~
. , ~T T ~ ~~
. , ~ - - -..~ ,~ ~ ~
~ ~ Mo~ . ~ aaws
~~ ` ~~ ~ ~ ~ I
~ ~ C
. ~~ - (. ~t Eue~ I ~
~
- -- s. .
~ YQJV~~6D fi}
~
PROPOSED
STORM DRAIN ,
LATERAL WITH
BATTERIES OF
AREA INLETS
a
LANE ENGINEERING SERVICE, INC.
~
~
q. "ri:.-: . , . •
' ~ ~[{n+ " . .
' ..~ ~`~w:~'= .i.~~" ' . - . ' _,
.~~~•'~ ~ . . _ . ~ .
S ,~
PROPOSED
STORIA DRAIN ~
- LATERd1L WITH
. BATTERIES OF ~
AREA INLETS ,
~ - ~~
r-- •- •- .-- --
- (~~ o ~~ ~~ W ~ ' ---r-F--- --
i1
~ / ~~ ~ <o v~ ~a v~ c
~
, ~ _ r/
~ ~
NEW CITY STOF
ORAIN WITH
CURB INLETS
~---
. *~
Md ~1op
. ~
ww. wwt w~a~s
A ~'~T~ f
s w
1 ~~ ,.._r-t
~ ~ ~ ~~
r~~vwcvv~ ~v
/ d
~ m m
_/i ~ J
~~ o~.a co L J~ m da ~
~~~~. ~~T~
~ m
, .~. _ _ ...~
~ ~, r.,.r
~ ca ~p~ ~
~
~
\ ~, ,
n~ ~.a ~
I ~ ~ Q-~
~ ~ ~' ~
~
~
~ ~, ~
^ ~
y !~
. ~ _ . ~ ,~ ~°' ~ , s ,,.,,,.w..C~.,
~~