Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWA-10-04City of WheatR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29'' Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 -8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 Approval of Variance WHEREAS, an application for a variance was submitted for the property located at 3345 Webster Street referenced as Case No. WA- 10 -04 /Gantenbein; and WHEREAS, City staff found basis for approval of the variance, relying on criteria listed in Section 26 -115 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws and on information submitted in the case file; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has properly notified pursuant to Section 26 -109 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws; and WHEREAS, there were no registered objections regarding the application; NOW THEREFORE, be it hereby resolved that a 12.5' front yard setback variance from the required 25' front yard setback requirement and a 5' side setback variance to the 10' side yard setback in an R -2 zone district (Case No. WA- 1 0-04/Gantenbein) are granted for the property located at 3345 Webster Street, based on the following findings of fact: 1. The request would not alter the essential character of the locality. 2. The applicant is proposing substantial investment in the property. 3. There are unique circumstances due to the required reservation area and the flag lot configuration and how setbacks must be measured. 4. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare and would not be injurious to neighboring property or improvements. 5. There have been no protests submitted during the ten -day public notification period. 6 -Z Zj Date Community Develolf #lent Director www.ci.wheatridgexo.us O� City of °� `7�7heatj�idge c o DEVELOPMENT CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT To: Case File CASE MANAGER: Meredith Reckert CASE NO. & NAME: WA -10 -04 /Gantenbein I DATE: June 18, 2010 ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a 12.5' front yard setback variance from the required 25' front yard setback requirement and a 5' side setback variance to the 10' side yard setback in an R -2 zone district LOCATION OF REQUEST: 3345 Webster Street APPLICANT (S): Keith Gantenbein for Crawford Holdings OWNER (S): Same APPROXIMATE AREA: 10,640 square feet PRESENT ZONING: Residential -Two (R -2) PRESENT LAND USE: Single Family Residential ENTER INTO RECORD: (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) ZONING ORDINANCE All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, an administrative decision may be made on this request. I. REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a two -fold variance request for construction of a detached garage in an R -2 zone district. The specific requests are to allow a 12.5' front yard setback variance from the required 25' front yard setback requirement and a 5' side setback variance to the 10' side yard setback in an R -2 zone resulting in a 12.5' front setback and 5' side setback for construction of a 20' x 20' detached garage. (Exhibit 1, Letter of Request/Responses to Evaluation Criteria) Section 26 -115.0 (Variances and Waivers) of the Wheat Ridge City Code allows that the Director of Community Development (Director) may grant administrative variances from the strict application of the zoning district development standards. Administrative variances are allowed for up to 50% of the development standard. All other development standards have been met. II. CASE ANALYSIS Existing Site Conditions The property is approximately 10,640 SF in size and is zoned R -2. The lot is a "through - lot" with frontage on Wadsworth as well as Webster Street, to the east is in a "flag lot" configuration. A final plat was recently processed to separate the house lot from vacant property on Webster. The property subject to the variance request is Lot 1 of the Gantenbein Subdivision. (Exhibit 2, plat copy) There is an existing single family home on Lot 1. The home is a story -and -a half in size with roughly 1329 square feet of area and was built in 1897. The property owner is in the process of refurbishing it and cleaning up the site. There is currently no covered parking on the lot. The home which is one of the oldest in the area was originally oriented towards Wadsworth with a driveway from Wadsworth for access. However when the property was subdivided, for safety concerns it was required by city staff and CDOT that the drive from Wadsworth be closed and access be gained from Webster Street. In order to accomplish this, a property "appendage" 20' in width extends east to the Webster Street right -of -way giving the property an unusual lot shape. The property is located within the Wadsworth sub -area plan boundaries and is likely to experience significant changes in the future due to the planned widening of Wadsworth Blvd. The widening would require approximately 25' to 30' of right -of -way along the western side of the property and to accommodate this, a reservation area was delineated on the plat. When the right -of -way acquisition occurs in the future by CDOT, the owner is typically paid fair market value for the land. Because it is anticipated that the 2 reservation area will be become right -of -way, no permanent structures can be built within this area and the setback line for construction is measured from the inside edge of the reservation area. The applicant is proposing a detached garage located in the southeastern corner of the main portion of the property. (Exhibit 3 and 4, site plan and structure elevations) Pursuant to the R -2 zone district regulations, rear setbacks abutting public streets must have a 25' setback. In addition, due to the flag lot configuration, the front setback from Webster must have a 25' setback starting at the widest portion of the lot. In essence, the required 25' setbacks from both the east and the west, reduce the buildable lot depth down to around 45' A garage meeting the required setbacks from both the east and west side could be built but it would result in a long driveway and limits any constructive use of the yard. In addition, due to the house location it's questionable as to whether a single car garage could be built. (Exhibit 5, building envelope). No right -of -way dedication was required for Webster Street, although the applicant was responsible for the installation of public improvements along the subdivision frontage. The following are the required development standards and resultant variance requests for the main structure. R -2 Development Standard Required Proposed Lot coverage 40% maximum 17% with reservation area 34% without reservation area Setbacks for detached garage. Front (east): 25' 12.5% Rear (west) 25' 60' Side (north): 10' 45' Side (south) 10' 5' Resulting variance requests 12.5' front setback variance and 5' side setback variance Adjacent Properties The property is surrounded on all sides with R -2 zoning; however, the corresponding lots vary greatly in size. To the north and south of the property along Wadsworth are single family home sites which vary in size from 4500 s.£ to 5100 s.f. with lot widths of around 50'. These properties are unplatted and the homes on them were built prior to the incorporation of the City (1965 and 1941). The properties on the Webster side directly across the street from the subject site measure 101'x 134' and are apart of the Connelee Subdivision which was approved in 1951. The duplex to the north on Webster is on property that is unsubdivided but measures 100' x 140'. The structure on this lot was built in 1960. Lot 2 of the subdivision is currently vacant but could accommodate a duplex. No objections were received during the 10 day posting period. III. VARIANCE CRITERIA In order to authorize an administrative variance, the Director must determine that the majority of the criteria for review listed in Section 26- 115.C.4 of the City Code have been met. Staff provides the following review and analysis of the variance criteria. 1. The property in question would not yield a reasonable return in use, service, or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located. The property could still be used as a single family residence without the need for a variance but it would preclude construction of a detached garage in the most logical location. There are alternative locations where a garage could be constructed that would may meet setbacks but could negatively impact the aesthetics of the property due to the large amount of paving that would be required leaving no lawn area for the property. In addition due to lack of width, only a single car could be built meeting separation between the south side of the house and north side of garage. Staff finds that this criterion has not been met. 2. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. While the garage would be setback only 25' from the front lot line, it actually will be located over 120' from Webster Street and 60' from Wadsworth. There appear to be numerous setback encroachments in the area in addition to existing properties substandard in size and/or lot width. Staff finds that this criterion has been met. 3. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property with this application, which would not be possible without the variance. This project represents substantial investment in the property. There is currently no covered parking on the property which will be an important asset demanded by contemporary home buyers if and when the property would be sold. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 4. The particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved results in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out. There are unique conditions related to the lot configuration due to public street frontages on both the front side and back side of the property. In addition, the reservation area adjacent to Wadsworth and the manner in which the front setback contribute to a unique hardship with few options for garage construction. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 5. The alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. The hardship was created by a person having an interest in the property as the current owner subdivided the property. Staff finds this criterion has not been met. 6. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located, by, among other things, substantially or permanently impairing the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or substantially diminishing or impairing property values within the neighborhood. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare and would not be injurious to neighboring property or improvements. It would not hinder or impair the development of the adjacent property. The adequate supply of air and light would not be compromised as a result of this request. The request would not increase the congestion in the streets, nor would it increase the danger of fire. The request will most likely not have a negative effect on property values in the neighborhood. Staff finds that this criterion has been met. The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are present in the neighborhood and are not unique to the property. All of the properties along Wadsworth will be impacted by future widening. However, due to the flag lot configuration, the unusual circumstances necessitating the variance request are not present in the neighborhood and are unique to the subject property. Most other homes in the area have covered parking but do not have the constraint of being a double - fronted lot. Staff finds that this criterion has been met. 8. Granting of the variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities. Single family dwellings are not subject to accessibility requirements. Staff finds that this criterion is not applicable. 9. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual. Single family dwellings are not subject to the requirements of the ASDM. This criterion is not applicable. 1V. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Having found the application in compliance with the majority of the review criteria, staff recommends approval of the variance request, Staff has found that there are unique circumstances attributed to this request due to the lot configuration, the required reservation area and the way in which the front yard setback is measured. Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL for the following reasons: 1. The request would not alter the essential character of the locality. 2. The applicant is proposing substantial investment in the property. 3. There are unique circumstances due to the required reservation area and the flag lot configuration and how setbacks must be measured. 4. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare and would not be injurious to neighboring property or improvements. 5. There have been no protests submitted during the ten -day public notification period. May 19, 2010 EXHIBIT I Request for Administrative Variance 3345 Webster Street Lot 1, 3400 Wadsworth Minor Subdivision Request for a side and front setback variance for the construction of a detached garage. The property does not currently have any car storage and due to the CDOT reservation and double fronted lot a garage cannot be built without a variance. Variance Criteria Review 13 B) This variance would not alter the character of the neighborhoor elevations. See - i foot by 1 ' :® garage th' t matches the character of the existing home. C) The construction of a detached garae represents a substantial ,. propertyinvestment in the . Without the variance it is not possible to build. 2) Access to the property from Wadsworth was eliminated. 3) The property is double fronted. 4) The Flag lot configuration. Clue to these conditions we cannot build a garage without a variance. E) Some of the conditions could be considered as self-imposed. The MOT Reservation was not and that eliminated any chance building a garage without a variance. The neighborhood benefits from the safer and more logical design of the property. I F) This variance, if granted would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood. This garage would sit behind Lot 2. It would add privacy for the owners of Lot 2 and for the people at 3345 Webster Street. The garage only adds value overall to the neighborhood. It would not affect anyone's vier or change traffic density. Sincerely =1 & MM EXHIBIT 2 4 S I R 8g m ¢ Ft e R to t o Y i p 4 3 i x g_______— __________________ R ¢ C t °. lK Wadsworth Boulevard 8 .00�avw z >: 8i %4 e i $ I I W ml u =1 N0P16'S5Y! ° 60.05' ' u e � ---------- I m w a o �4 _ ___ m y - - -- �- 50721'211EE EEee R8 n R 45- i LJLJ £e• F i I 'v �e.koCSd° d I I g_______— __________________ R ¢ C t °. lK Wadsworth Boulevard 8 .00�avw z >: 8i %4 e i $ I I W ml u =1 N0P16'S5Y! ° 60.05' ' u e � ---------- I m w a e r __ I I I $$ $$ Rig¢ q R 6� vo E 68.44' o �4 _ ___ T- - - -- �- 50721'211EE EEee R8 e r __ I I I $$ $$ Rig¢ q R 6� vo E 68.44' _ _ ___ &= g § p. EEee R8 45- i i I 'v �e.koCSd° d I I 61 a 4 � @➢ I I �5 p; g :4 gg $I i e S 1 I on i. i I = I 5 I I f 128.47'- 1 Webster Street (Aveuve) L � W a b N m 0 O J — e N n 0) I m N I �S I A � I ,o W I m I S np I (_ IAA? I I L� IT�J N I I � rt O j m lD I �rt 0 0 I O � I a rt I C � I lD i \ m o _______ i ________ K / C I _a W I 3 I I � � RYR'g § r. pg� b9 €€ P ER RD V € m all T n 5��5 aa 3 p =e "wS� qsua- ,1 p IN To R Tod y 6 y + d�� 1. £� egg W g � fp� wbNadn K.§ 12al id d s ^45 "N °sa 6 e � FY 3? e s& iR p @£ D O 1 c W H N I EXHIBIT 3 � m "o Y I o gfi� Y S ao i NO3'52111"E 68.44' �- I ---------------------------- , I AREA RE5ERVED I FOR RO.W. I I m ___1_____________________ N00'19'25 "W 6830' I }_ I € m 6 = n X I I I m -s I M i $ h �I I I I.__________ _ --------- 0 m I N j �r � N� � I v! IB m m � N FU D wl ' r 1 j n me rr11 6�1> I � 1 � m T ! � I I ; j I I I I I I 20ID0' � m "o Y I o gfi� Y S ao D' EXHIBIT 4 Cx,4iR,4CsE 3400 WADSWORTH BLVD WHEATRIDCsE, COLORADO EXHIBIT 5 NO3'S2'll "E 68.44' �__ __ ________________ n Dp j @m AREA RESERVED w1 I FOR RO.W. I cn � - - - -- ---- 00'19'25 "W 6830' I I ----'i -I I = I N� D O I m � m I Q q I. —• m6 i 9 2 i p P j mj N89'41'25 "E 4 ,r I I i� � W I I I s. I I I I I I i 1 I i 20ID0' mm O 0 W �T� m � II`t.l- 4t1>kTit P,O[7. 0�1XO n Dp j @m D w1 N� ,r I I i� � W I I I s. I I I I I I i 1 I i 20ID0' mm O 0 W �T� m � II`t.l- 4t1>kTit P,O[7. N s s [: • �► • • I a & I « t \ © f � a ? \ t « « � d a y » 4 \ f : Page 1 of 1 Meredith Reckert From: Meredith Reckert Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 1:43 PM To: 'keithgantenbein @hughes.net' Subject: RE: variance stuff Yes, everything appears to be in good shape. I am working on your report but ended up with a house emergency at the end of last week. Will try to get the package to Ken in the next day or so. Meredith Reckert, AICP Senior Planner Office Phone: 303 - 235 -2348 ,f W I i I C I go )..aa4 ;f 6'l tltve 'vI a '• . From: keithgantenbein @hughes.net [mailto :keithgantenbein @hughes.net] Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 12:53 PM To: Meredith Reckert Subject: variance stuff hello just checking in with you. you are waiting on the referrals right? how is the admin variance different from the others? did i answer the questions ok? keith 6/14/2010 - u PW jjv,�P ------ - ---------- - - ---------- ...... ■ ------------------------------------- �A REW�O ROA ---------------------------------- ��� � m m ......... ...... ...... M X Um ) '\ M X 7 0 -> ri gj m m z z m �.�..�....�.. -6 \ . )� \( P U UEBSTER SIREET \ \ \ \ \ \| ) 0 54945E z 3400 WAED5WORTH 15LVD ��c WHEATRInC.E, C-CLOFR,41DO ? -X� ° o ' D Z 4 H N w O 0 Z . D mm O r Z 4 w A 1 m fig � a RI IN a �� { � 4 { ° €� B R� g � F 3400 WADSWORTH LVD c gs m's N yp $oQg e g 333�m g WHEATRIDCGE, COLORADO 111110 z e, a p o norm rm R Q ,pm H >p rn W io •xe^ ovep�no coax P.p X i >p rn W io •xe^ ovep�no coax P.p X i ,0m N rr ^ -m 0 q € s R g 2 8 °€ is 9 Hi € 3480 WADSWORTI —V BLVD � p 35 ' zsas" •xa Q ?5 WHEATRIDGsE, COLORADO ; m8A VJ A / 0 - () c{1 6a n-�- 6,e„ , CRAWFORD HOLDING CORP D &J INC 8295 RALSTON RD 300 3420 W ALAMEDA AVE ARVADA CO 80002 DENVER CO 80219 7009 1680 0001 2748 6845 39- 261 -00 -185 7009 1680 0001 2748 6944 POLOCZ ALICE 39- 261 -00 -186 7450 W 2 V 92 39- 261 -14 -028 ARVA 0 3747 39- 261 -14 -027 7009 1680 0001 2748 6852 39- 261 -14 -026 5500 W 44TH AVE 39- 261 -14 -001 ANGEL SEAN C 39- 261 -14 -002 7575 W 33RD AVE 39- 261 -00 -184 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 6215 39- 261 -00 -183 39- 261 -00 -048 7009 1680 0001 2748 6869 39- 261 -00 -049 RUTERBORIES LEROY J RUTERBORIES SHAVAUN A 7525 W 33RD AVE WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 6215 7009 1680 0001 2748 6876 BURCHAM RO ENE! 747,5 W 33 V f 7009 1680 0001 2748 6883 PREHNJANET 11910 W 76TH DR ARVADA CO 80005 3320 7009 1680 0001 2748 6890 BUECHER WALTER H BUECHER BARBARA A 810 S FIELD ST LAKEWOOD CO 80226 4111 7009 1680 0001 2748 6906 SHAFFER JOHN E SHAFFER JO LEE 1389 STUART ST DENVER CO 80204 1242 7009 1680 0001 2748 6913 TREPANIERJOCELYN 4385 XENON ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 7009 1680 0001 2748 6920 �� Cp HORSESHOE BEACH DEVELOPMENT LLC 5500 W 44TH AVE , DENVER CO 80212 7009 1680 0001 2748 6937 City of l Wheat�idge - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29' Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 -8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 CERTIFIED LETTER NOTICE May 26, 2010 Dear Property Owner: This is to inform you of Case No. WA- 10 -04, a request for approval of a 5 foot variance to the 10 foot side yard setback requirement and a 12.5 foot variance to the 25 foot front yard setback requirement on property zoned Residential -Two (R- 2) and located at 3345 Webster Street (formerly known as 3400 Wadsworth Blvd.) for the purpose of building a detached garage. The applicant for this case is requesting an administrative variance review which allows no more than a fifty percent (50 %) variance to be granted by the Zoning Administrator without need for a public hearing. Prior to the rendering of a decision, all adiacent property owners are required to be notified of the request by certified mail. If you have any questions, please contact the Planning Division at 303 -235 -2846 or if you would like to submit comments concerning this request, please do so in writing by 5:00 p.m. on June 4, 2010. Thank you. WA1004.doc www.ci.wheatridge.co.us J UNIIED IEIHDDI5 cnuuH N -C WM1 -5 R -3 N 3 Z R X t � t e 3 9 m W 35TH AVE RC o Mm R PCD OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WHEAT RIDGE COLORADO 3E 23 $ AN E 0 ROD E STATE i R � $ DEAVIY,'� R O w1 SUPPLY y C 3]9J z WZ -9T -8 i' m n 31as ono ms W tl _ _ N.C. RC o Mm R PCD OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WHEAT RIDGE COLORADO 3E 23 $ AN E 0 ROD E R � $ R O w1 y C 3]9J z m n 31as ono ms W tl _ _ N.C. PBG98 -2 3T3R 31 o u WZ R 3 31,1 3101 g s B&ti ''. 8 J,oz alos ^ 3115 W]TIH AVE n 3m, 365, ssro 363s m m m m w W]6TH PL �• >u 3W5 ^ R 3 m w Y 36A 35u - G V `m ;SgS m YJS61Ai �5 5 351s W ]sTn PL E R AW Q Af ID GE H ;v . FA K R- 3533 1.{ X 3531 35,5 Z L n "x SUN Wz6TH AVE Z 8 t? Sass p xeo m A W 33RD AVE R-2- 3E 26 PARCEULOT BOUNDARY (DESIGINATES OWNERSHIP) -- WATER FEATURE * DENOTES MULTIPLE ADDRESSES %1 100 -YEAR FLOOD PLAIN L • �I (APPROXIMATE LOCATION) NE 26 QD O 100 200 �00 400 F,c DEPARTMENT OF MAP ADOPTED: June 15, 1994 $ AN E 0 ROD E R O w1 y n R-2- 3E 26 PARCEULOT BOUNDARY (DESIGINATES OWNERSHIP) -- WATER FEATURE * DENOTES MULTIPLE ADDRESSES %1 100 -YEAR FLOOD PLAIN L • �I (APPROXIMATE LOCATION) NE 26 QD O 100 200 �00 400 F,c DEPARTMENT OF MAP ADOPTED: June 15, 1994 3E 26 PARCEULOT BOUNDARY (DESIGINATES OWNERSHIP) -- WATER FEATURE * DENOTES MULTIPLE ADDRESSES %1 100 -YEAR FLOOD PLAIN L • �I (APPROXIMATE LOCATION) NE 26 QD O 100 200 �00 400 F,c DEPARTMENT OF MAP ADOPTED: June 15, 1994 � �T 13 42 001 N 41 002 L 40 003 39 004 Ner2o MTO /T 3 >111 46 I F t, I I I 3 i i 3c� -A l 09 W 34th PI. 017 1185 -426 OOH13 v 6 178 ST. HWY. 1185 -422 ST. HWY. V 31 14 32 027 Qg 1 3 4 014 013 012 2 � 015 West N_ a.., cn 24 23 22 (D f/ 002 003 004 a ✓14 25 0 001 O V 33 1 34 1 35 1 36 1 3 026 025 024 023 022 May 19, 2010 REQUEST FOR ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE 3345 WEBSTER STREET LOT 1. 3400 WADSWORTH MINOR SUBDIVISION We are requesting a side and front setback variance for the construction of a detached garage. The property does not currently have any car storage and due to the lot configuration (flag lot) a garage cannot be built without a variance. VARIANCE CRITERIA A) The property consists of a renovated turn of the century two story home. This home because of its design does not have a lot of extra space for storage and there is no existing garage. A garage is badly needed, not just for car storage but for all the other things (lawnmower, freezer, christmas decorations ect.) as well. The addition of a modest garage would add a great deal of utility and value to the property. B) This variance would not alter the character of the neighborhood. See elevations. If granted, we will construct a 20 foot by 20 foot garage that matches the character of the existing home. Q We have spent a considerable amount time and money renovating the existing home. It would be a shame if we could not finish the job properly. Granting this easement will only enhance the value and utility of the property. D) Earlier this year we applied for and received a variance approval (lot width) and a minor subdivision approval for a two lot subdivision. We chose to divide the property in a manner that we felt was the most logical and would grant the most effective use for both of the properties created by the division of land. We could have divided the land differently (see attachment A) and that would have not required this variance request. The use of the property and how it fits in the neighborhood we believe to be more important. That is why we did not choose the configuration in attachment A. E) This parcel of land originally had ingress and egress from Wadsworth. Because of the traffic on Wadsworth and safety concerns we abandoned our access directly onto Wadsworth. This means the property would be accessed from Webster only and that is why the flagpole lot was created. F) This variance, if granted would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood. This garage would sit behind Lot 2. It would add privacy for the owners of lot 2 and for the people at 3345 Webster. The garage only adds value overall to the neighborhood. It would not affect anyone's view or change traffic density. G) The circumstances necessitating the variance request were based on our choice of site configuration. We deemed this as the best for the two properties created and immediate neighborhood. Sincerely / r� Keith Gantenbein 2�09S122 $ 11 00 2Df $9� .4 PM E19strvJAisailq R€&vrde4 deflersvn CoUM �6 Pam Anders Clerk and Rwrcier T�IMW Y a3#irrmddd% 9P9:SJBSLit9#i m YN8999 Mvac»;F.43 a99aE SVWJAL'WA1?RWff Y3eB9F.CS, i{y�Y ygabAm'8mk�f19,4999bdWeRe • 8F11T�t)1@$ ANK1�FfT 117NN. YNUHTR9 t/9ANY.RBINBLHTfr)13�7fi115T�rr B�fYHR1NB€3fldlrp� 6S9"IDT05fbHAASSUni k'i r' 319A7i%sPIiZFAA4S €'r9AEKf9 r SE>iJ€d 20.9741 M lip c *,# ✓ — al8b af�e), arrT &m»isrd 3AP>8in9 eery wbsasOs�iml9reask%19k COMM - M9u . rulbYsi3. nifa2 .9.t42Aekol�vlum9u,dsrm!»®S); , +NrrWFbSE7N. Yf» lil »{XRWPrfS>9tf ®oAb16N1s19efaN9P or9 »mMlvllilrWrYFaw'lltDl6sa�NarW 99iM9 HBl3lnsiH8�49S,�BPP), abet++ ca> al &IdF'�91e#enDYMWIdCharoh5roly erM1P.WNM99Y�. i+sv89rmrM. 5sr9elPO� ssldsnd ssrwsY?s,andby'81wag9 A [W,9'en4b+?9em , astl. PW0 8� Lq , 9 " ry .SI 1W 9renlee(�, 9i8k8»#seMSadD9sAwave, dy ' hpeL4 wm� )4mtasYmlr9nls,Ha.sll�mrs, b�0.g and Ldra in:9re CPPNVM StASa7&9bmfs.aYBCrC»CBilnria:. alas ➢trarmtg'n9oebandhAmlbsrsa; 8A99Werl� »mAA711a4, ,ry}g#Jf?!S!gv.C�809H2 T®. G,ST1aErtaMaMatlertlslu9' 1DrU »7»radP.amen�sas9spR'+�!'a' »^-° P,®rstobslnuArW . srlPetmrlaa sr W � P � e� �r� U � r } gb r^ bAdY�Gr94 !A N9,r�raml9rc.>Aral!dsf&+LfSHf gre rarW, P owAs9mFb9rxi 8lamlae?.' YPoN9s1 mr» Amareuhssr» Hy�. ISAU !Mto-salU»IPl7W?r9rESpAYasliAP 9�td2YYAr�Y51ifl6�iN9s�7�abafabi l9r4!��Utl9ca]Ibe9mWr9» W!»^� aG19 9»�A9seMa7, ars#k»#a 19 aa�r» eYal, Rrd91a9r rWUwr»AVee,9uMdwlrsA- pWav rrer myresa% �rssar/ f�sevaYa ».AsFeYeamlmdd»r9#Y�.�e!A�aHI MJAI%BhtlTAmDFSJRfiuOA 9EFETdA9» PbDYCbWV�S99rsAr�9bbi9 »d8�38s9}»P'�lY9sA9salaP PfB»9rYrpgrd!)rffiYM'1»499aA � tlar/ 3sr9M3+& �A' pms= rr '��'W4wa}9»taara »Y{�'JihemMr4Y ?Nasphsrnu0e+9la 1cr0e+ l6* aJl9rssa !daeawsmenAelAtlreryssaYr2oW an4 su9satpisnl3'serw sraJ9ul�sst+s sa9smenta, mYanaPMa, a9sfvra4kr », as9#.�19f» nrW ri9irMS aJmey M rmmrD. WI» reverusea9r, PSIw91 sSaPwleefAS+ anYAxNa »wasbus9 »hsaU+9s�srmrmw»su arA.�Pkr ral A® raasa7aklrosmrahvaobbenWralMYrmraww lr�9»uvrk# as�+as9+staramssMa%PMrar� lmla?nMM bn+�»Imsd'b r0/mi�gAS 9mtrtAABraYb»bdAHB691 r om�.�dlass 9fllW SSU�, 7d YClT)!E @BYdb,9 »9r8r99r¢)hnYa rx4s81eil 91lf99s98Y tl ».aW74 sY11DJBta1+W 8, ) MM OM MW NsTd®eA69'l "Cv#v atY,.A9 • Mom auAEwig =- s7WSJt'fMStliSMUJ3€ A"Fr,9AqwTvtw,gfwf WPM >3A91bm98aauSew4 Lp" ibsn »tm�w 9OLVYAtC.FARLAW M4SPR@S1MT i b. 9 F F,g,, yyt SSSdAme PW/ 9aE SSafPad0.Y99 rr, Auass e `P City of Wheat�id le COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29'" Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 -8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 Submittal Checklist - Variances (administrative and non - administrative) Project Name: , 6 ,46 Ie Se / dGc A' Applicant: rAa - c 2 Project Planner: Project Location: 3 3 et' S 1,1e 5 f Y�l �7 Date: G" / S- r o Fee Paid: Information to be submitted and accepted with variance applications Plan: I/ 1. Completed, notarized application ✓ 2. Fee Proof of ownership (deed) ` of Attorney (if an agent is acting for property owner) Written request including justification for this request as responses to the evaluation criteria v 6. Survey or Improvement Location Certificate for the property. v 7. Proposed building elevations As applicant for this project, I hereby ensure that all of the above requirements have been included with this submittal. I fully understand that if any one of the items listed on this checklist has been excluded, the documents will NOT be distributed for City review. In addition, I understand that in the event any revisions need to be made after the second (2„ d) full review, II will be subject to the applicable resubmittal fee. /� Signature: e' " �/� " � t4 ' , Date: 5 "I C Name (please print): �� r ` �� �/ ° ` °� f Rev. 4/10 Phone: 5 - n / y 7 `SZ / 3 www.ci.wheatridge.co.us e� N d N ' (C� 41 I , Z I C _. o6 cy) -1 00 co N I 3 I N rn c O Ca I OD I ( — w O I a� 4' E. 'N m I I (50') 50.05' I d . I I I 4-------- -- 1----------- - - - - -- West 34th Avenue I I I I I I / I I I PARCEL RECEPTION — — — — NO. F'0793285 i I ZONED R- 2- 50' - - °I P AR RECEPTION 009 35250 I ZONED R -2 I ( N I L I/2" e (RECORD 88.5') N. (RECORD 140') N89'43'01 "E 87.94' N89'43'01 "E 141.59' #6 I o --------- - - - - -- ---------------------- r b 5' UTILITY EASEMENT 24.905_' - - � o - -J N I m z i I N44 3 ----------- - - - - -- #11 m UJg� I 1 .09 �' ------------------- � I L a g l LET 1 I � o % # 10 N89 "E 99.88' I -- — — — — — — — — — 1 N I 0.243 ACRES I q I d I w Uj I m r = Ln 10604 SQ FT I #9 I pQ 5~ I o �, ZONED R -2 i , i / I N I z O I = m�0 ', OMB I Z I I O - 01 wo IZ Z I w I U a 5 UTILITY EASEMENT j -� � i, s I o 2 -- --- -- - - -- I I r w p LO #2 -- cV S89'47 85.02' , N89' 25 �_ E 1 #$ LOT 2 j 0 v I 0 , ,,, I 0,327 ACRES J I N J mf (RECORD 85) 3 N I 39.97 14243 SQ FT N I 0 tn . it I ZONED R -2 o f ( p I 0 PARCEL RECEPTION 0 0 0 Zi I I 0 NO. F1963113 f P I ZONED R -2 00 ;^ I I O 0 1 Z - L ------- - - - - 5' UTILITY EASEMENT - I #7 L39.97 (40')-- - - - - -- —----- - - - - # — S89 2"W 149.63' - -� l-°� - -- Fence Corner I W. Face Power Pole (RECORD 146.9') i 4.3' East Fence Corner 1' East POINT OF \\ BEGINNING \ I I \ 33rd AND VANCE SUBDIVISION I C MMENCEMENT I I \ \ �4 \ I I Ib LOT 3 J4 CORNER SECTION 26 I I \ 1 fOI \ ZONED R -2 I LOT 33 I P IN RANGE BOX I \ l b \ I PLS 13212 I LOT 31 \ I I 57' E:1115458.25' ZONED R -2 I k \ 5. PER COLO j THIS LAND 12 U.S. S TECHNOLO 6. THE GEOD COLORADO ACCURACY DEFINED II GEODETIC 7. ACCORDIN( 8. AS PER F MAP NO. ! PARCEL IS SURVEYOR I, CHARLES H OF 3400 WADS I BY ME OR UN OF MY KNOWL{ APPLICABLE Cl THE ACCOMPAI !, COUNTY C STATE OF COL COUNTY OF JE I HEREBY CER' j RECORDER OF ON THE IN BOOK W N _ d (V _. o6 cy) U 00 co 0 0 Z O Ca I ( — 45.04' WC 4' E. (RECORD 85) 3 N I 39.97 14243 SQ FT N I 0 tn . it I ZONED R -2 o f ( p I 0 PARCEL RECEPTION 0 0 0 Zi I I 0 NO. F1963113 f P I ZONED R -2 00 ;^ I I O 0 1 Z - L ------- - - - - 5' UTILITY EASEMENT - I #7 L39.97 (40')-- - - - - -- —----- - - - - # — S89 2"W 149.63' - -� l-°� - -- Fence Corner I W. Face Power Pole (RECORD 146.9') i 4.3' East Fence Corner 1' East POINT OF \\ BEGINNING \ I I \ 33rd AND VANCE SUBDIVISION I C MMENCEMENT I I \ \ �4 \ I I Ib LOT 3 J4 CORNER SECTION 26 I I \ 1 fOI \ ZONED R -2 I LOT 33 I P IN RANGE BOX I \ l b \ I PLS 13212 I LOT 31 \ I I 57' E:1115458.25' ZONED R -2 I k \ 5. PER COLO j THIS LAND 12 U.S. S TECHNOLO 6. THE GEOD COLORADO ACCURACY DEFINED II GEODETIC 7. ACCORDIN( 8. AS PER F MAP NO. ! PARCEL IS SURVEYOR I, CHARLES H OF 3400 WADS I BY ME OR UN OF MY KNOWL{ APPLICABLE Cl THE ACCOMPAI !, COUNTY C STATE OF COL COUNTY OF JE I HEREBY CER' j RECORDER OF ON THE IN BOOK LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION Community Development Department 7500 West 29 Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Phone (303) 235 -2846 (Please print or type all information) Applicant Ci /v c d Address State v Zip (VKDa c Z Fax 3-.3HZg55 -2 Owner }a e- Address Phone City State Zip Fax 7 Contac / l� h G w1 YP n 6 Q rt Address r ( 2 rt S le- (s iy>7. �� S -3 cll Phone J J39y75 City 6 State Ca Zip � d0 Z- Fax 3�3�1L` /SSZ (The person listed as contact will be contacted to answer questions regarding this application, provide additional information when necessary, post public hearing signs, will receive a copy of the staff report prior to Public Hearing, and shat l be responsible for forwarding all verbal and written communication to applicant and owner.) , . 1 / / Location of request (address): �j 3 L( 5 (/ e 5 / Q�1 � r Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request): Application submittal requirements on reverse side • Change of zone or zone conditions ❑ Special Use Permit • Consolidation Plat ❑ Subdivision: Minor (5 lots or less) • Flood Plain Special Exception ❑ Subdivision: Major (More than 5 lots) • Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Right of Way Vacation • Planned Building Group ❑ Temporary Use, Building, Sign • Site Development Plan approval Variance /Waiver (from Section ) • Other: Detailed description of tze V c " "t <x— YCP(t ✓red f !v r Required information: Assessors Parcel Number: Current Zoning: �/- - L Current Use: '51 y 1 e l= - Size of Lot (acres or square footage): Proposed Zoning: Proposed I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above, without whose consent the requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners must submit power- of -ai#orpe ornthe owner which approved of this action on his behalf. % f / II —_ Signature of Applicant — _7_ N S {� Subscrib 'sworn to' t day of 20 ( U otar Public pUSL�G �POO y commission expires ��_ 9 _ 13 To be filled out by staff: /o6oel & Date received �O pO Fee $ Receipt o.� �d hr5(P 6 Case No. Comp Plan Zonin „Z Quarter Section g Related Case e N No. Pre -App Mtg. Date Case Manager , PcIL.z. -zT Status CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE 85/24/18 1 -36 PM cdbb Crawford Holding RECEIPT NO:CD11804560 AMOUNT FMSD ZONING APPLICATION F 208.80 zone PAYMENT RECEIVED AMOUNT CK 2678 280.80 TOTAL 288.80 City of A LANG USE APPLICATION FORM COM Wheat MUNITY DEvuopLE, T Case No. WA1004 _ Date Received _ 6/24/2010' Related Cases Case Planner Reck_ -a Case Description Variance to front and side yard setbacks Appdcanr /arive Name Crawford Holding Corp. Name �— Phone (303J 424 -5527 Address 8295 Ralston Rd., Suite 300 City Arvada ; State CO Zip 80002 _ _ . Name Crawford Holding Corp Name Phone [303]424.5521 Address 18295 Ralston Rd, Suite 300 '., City Arvada State CO Zip 80002 CalNacr /,r/emrarioiY Name IKeithGantenbein Name F Phone (303)947.5213 .. Address 8295 Ralston Rd, Suite 300 !. City Arvada _ Slate rC Zp 80002 Rv�esr /ldw.eaar�orY Address r3 Street IWebstet Street !, City Wheat Ridge State fff Zip 80033 - Location Description formerly 3400 Wadsworth Blvd. Project Name Parcel No. _ _ Qtr Section: NE26 Distrct No.: f/eriervs . Pre -App Date F— Neighborhood Meeting Date App No: Review Type Review Body "iReWaw Date- f)rsposdion Commenls,'f ... Report ,. .: ..:. .,. �,. .. ., Review Disposri5v� Case Disposition I Disposition Date Conditions of Approval Notes Status CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE 85/24/18 1 -36 PM cdbb Crawford Holding RECEIPT NO:CD11804560 AMOUNT FMSD ZONING APPLICATION F 208.80 zone PAYMENT RECEIVED AMOUNT CK 2678 280.80 TOTAL 288.80