Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWZ-98-06WHEAT RIDGE CITY r- ~UNCIL MEETING: JUNE 22,199' PAGE -5- ITEM 4. An application from Baptist Home Association of the Rocky Mountains, Inc. for approval of an amendment to the Mountain Vista Retirement t/ Village Planned Community Development (PCD) final development plan with variances for the construction of six independent living units and carports located at 4700 Tabor Street. (Case' No WZ-98-06) Item 4 was introduced by Mrs. Worth; title read by the Clerk. Ronald Heselton, 7682 Saulsbury Street, was present and sworn in. Mr. Heselton was representing the Baptist Home Association as the Director of Special Projects, taking care of the construction and any other problems that come up in the organization. He introduced Mr. Robert Taylor from R & R Engineering. Mr. Taylor has done the site development plan at this location. Mr. Heselton gave an overview of Baptist Home Association and its goals. Robert Taylor, was sworn in and answered Councils' questions. Mrs. Worth asked that they put up a guard rail on the Southwest corner. Meredith Reckert, was present and sworn in. Ms. Reckert gave the staff report and recommended that Council approve.the plan amendment because all requirements have been met. Motion by Mrs. Worth that the request for approval of setback variances next to the right-of-way for property located at 4700 Tabor Street be approved for the following reasons: 1. A variance is required to allow construction on the property as shown on the development plan. 2. The topography of the site and the excess right-of-way along the frontage road have created unique circumstances; seconded by Mrs. Dalbec; carried 6- 1 with Mr. DiTullio voting no. Motion by Mrs. Worth that Case No. WZ-98-6, a request for approval of an amendment to a Planned Commercial final development plan for property located at 4700 Tabor Street, for the following reasons: 1. The proposal is consistent with the underlying outline development plan. 2. All requirements for a PCD plan amendment have been met. With the following condition that a guard rail will be put up on the Frontage Road above the two duplexes on the Southwest corner and the cost of the guard rail be split 50/50 between the applicant and the City of Wheat Ridge. The part that the City will contribute is not to exceed $5,000 with the money coming from the Capital Improvement Funds; seconded by Mr. Eafanti. Friendly Amendment by Mr. Siler that provided CDOT will allow. . WHEAT RIDGE CITY C')UNCIL MEETING: JUNE 22,199F PAGE -6- Original motion carried 6-1 with Mr. DiTullio voting no. ITEM 5. An application submitted by the Public Service Company for approval of a re-subdivision plat to allow for a lot line adjustment for the relocation of a Public Service Company natural gas regulator facility. (Case No. MS-98-01) Item 5 was introduced by Mr. Siler; title read by the Clerk. Marjorie and Vernon Vohoska, owners of the property at the corner of West 44'n Avenue, were present and sworn in. Mrs. Vohoska made comments explaining the subdivision plans and asked for Councils' approval. Alan White, Wheat Ridge Planning Director, was present and sworn in. Mr. White presented the staff report. Mr. White mentioned a correction he would like to make under the Dedication statement and add it as a condition of approval. He would like it to read, "installing sanitary sewers, street pavement, curbs, gutters, sidewalks and other utilities shall not be guaranteed and paid for by the City of Wheat Ridge." Motion by Mrs. Worth to suspend the rules to allow Mrs. Shaver to continue the conversation; seconded by Mrs. Shaver; failed 4-3 with Councilmembers Siler, Mancinelli, and DiTullio voting no (takes 5 votes to pass). Odarka Figlus was sworn in by the Mayor; she is part owner of the property at 7741 West 44" Avenue, which is directly adjacent to Mr. Vohoska's property; she is glad the property is being redeveloped; objects to numbering the parcel on the West end, which is requested to be 7605 West 44' Avenue; this implies that the building is actually on the corner of 44'n and Wadsworth; the building is actually a block west of Wadsworth; the building directly across the street from the building under construction, is 7700, which is 100 numbers of from 7605 and her building, which is right next door, is 7741; this will be confusing. She asked that the number remain 7701 to provide consistency and avoid confusion. Motion by Mr. Siler that Case No. MS-98-01, a request for approval to resubdivide a plat on property located at 7605 West 44" Avenue and 4401 Wadsworth Boulevard, be approved for the following reasons: 1. It is required to allow the redevelopment of this property. 2. All requirements of the Subdivision Regulations have been met. With the following conditions: 1. On the plat the dedication statement be corrected to include the word "not" on the 6' line above combined legal description; 2. On Note 3., 5' line, remove the words "from adjacent property and/or"; seconded by. Mrs. Worth. i J~II A C~ .~'.~'I H Revisions ~~1 L D Lo C~~' ~H.~A RED ~E si CHARTER STATEMENT ~~fi' ~ , ~rnrTnTT~ Tn~ v~C~~~ R~~TTRF~I~IT,'1~TT VTT.T.Q n, rnr~ r nn, rrn, rnn~~~nT~ DT ~I AT THIS PROJECT PROPOSES THE CONSTRtJCTiON OF THREE DU~'LEXES, (SIX INDEPENDENT PARTti~_NTS) ,"-..'~C ArS'~CIATED COVERED P,AF~KING ON A 5.46 ACRD PROPERTY ~GCATED ON THE NORTF~EAST COREdER OF WES1 4V~ST 48TH AVENUE AND TABOR STREET !N THE CITY aF WNEAT RIDGE. THESE APAR'~~f"EN TS `~I~L aE ARCHITECTI~'R~~.LY COORDINATED AND OF HIGN QUALITY. TN~S PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTHERN !'OF14N OF THE PROFE~`~TY SURVEYOR'S CERTIFtCATE~ ADJAC:EP~IT TO AND COCRQINATED WITH THE EX~`;;TING '.''~UNTAIN VISTA RETIREMENT COMM~~NITY. f RC)BFRT B. TAYLOR, DU HEREBY Cr.RTIFY iHAT THE SUFZVEY OF THE BOUNDA~~Y OF LOT 4, MOUNTAIN GE~I~ROUS PERIMETER ~ANDSCAPI"~C~, 0~'EN SPACE, ANp BUILC~ING SETBACKS NAVE :~~tN PI~QV!DED ~N VISTA RETIREMENT VILLAGE -FILING NQ ? WAS MADE_ iJNDER P1Y D!RLCT RESPONSiBIU?Y, SUPERVISION, ALL SlQES OF THE PROPERTY IN G~~'~J~R TC BUFFER ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND TO Cf~EAT~: A QUALITY AND CHECKING AND IN ACCORGA.NCE `v~r"I`H ALL APPL!CAF3LE: CC!LC?ADO STATUES, CU;<1?tNT REVISED ENVIRC}N"~'E~JT Vv'ITHiN THE PRdJECT. THE PARKING AREAS NAVE SEEN DES3GN~D TO ALLOW ~ CSR CLEAR EDITI0~1, AS AP.+,ENDED. CII~CULAT3~N WliFi~N THE PROJECT, AS WE1L AS .A SEPARAT',ON OF PEDESTRIAP~ "+N(~ VEHICULAR TRAFFIC. THE ~~IA7ERIAl.5 lJSED IN THE CONSTRUCTiGti' OF THIS FACI~IT'~' '~ti~_L BE CONSISTENT i~v CQL~R AND TEXTURE W4TH THE EXISTING BU1~D1~1GS ON THE PRC~PF~TY. FOR EXAMPLE: BRfCK, WOOD, STONE A."~ D GLA5S. THE STYLE C}F THE BUI~.DINGS SHALL REFLECT THE RESfDENTIA~ QUALITY OF THE COMPLEX THt~T R0~3E:R i 8. TAYLOR P.L.S. X28291 HAS BEEN ESTAB~(SHED THROUGH PREVIOUS EXiS I!v(~ PHASES OF~ CONSiK;JCTaON. THE ROOFS WILL B~EN~ WITH THE ONES OF THE EXISTING MQUNTAIN VISTA RETIREMENT CC~PsRP,~UNITY. THE. F~I~dAL LAY(7UT AtiD Gec~ENTATION OF THE BUIL~JING FOOTPRINTS SHALL BE C'~ ~~GNED TC~ ALLOW FOR APPROVALS ANp ENCOURAGE THE KIP~D OF PEQESTRIAN ACTIVITY INHEREPJT TO THIS TYPE OF RETIREMENT COMMUi~17Y. WA~SW~R~H DITCH C~JMPANr - ~Et~~1~'SGRIPTI01~ ~.pT 4, h4~UN !.SIN Vs~ ! A Kt I IKtMtiv f v~GLA~t. ..lV ..1. ! L . G V `t V ~ ~.%-'"F~'.1FAE.'IL~yI CITY OF WHEAT RIDE, Cl?t1NTY 0~ JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO r-- Ui C H A! R M A N~~ _ SITE ----~_~~v---._ PLANNING AND ~~vE1~0~'"~"ENT dIRECTGR , 31TE DATA~~ PERMITTED USFS:- r ~~L iJSE:~ AI.L,:JN,`F.D ~Nii~R RECORDED FINAL. DEVELOPMENT PLAN. CITY COUNG~. CERTIFICATION L.QT 4 - INDE~'ENDE~IT AP ARTiv1ENTS. EX!~~11NG PLAN Af~1F:_~J[~ED P_L,AN A('PROVE~ THIS ~A.Y OF 19--, BY ' ~ Ir,:= ';°~H~AT RIDGE Architec#s Engineers Planners i CITY COi~I~CI~. PROPERTY AREA: 5.46 ACRES 5.46 ACRES KDA, P.C. VICINITY MAP MAYOR 1201 18th 5#. Suite 20Q DENVER, C(~. 80242 BUILQING AREA: 83,8x0 SQ.~T. - ~5~ 89,176 SQ.FT. - 37~ (PH} 303-296-8556 (~`AX) 343-29fi-8555 N.T.S. PARKING/DRIVE: 62,ODQ SQ.FT. - 26~ 67,720 SQ.~T. - 2~% CITY SEAL LANDSCAPE AREA: 92,OOQ SQ.~r. - 39~ 87,340 SQ,FT. - 34 A?TEST: 7C7TAL # OF UN4TS: 41 ~7 VISTA VILLAGE TOTAL ~ PARKING SPACES: 42 64 OWA~R~ INDEPENDENT LIVING THE BELOW-SIGNED OvVNER(5), OR ~EGA~LY DESIGNATED AGENTS} TNER~OF, DO HEREBY CC~lNTY CLERK AND R~CaRDER8 CERT~tCATE" WHEAT RIDGE, CO AGREE THAT THE PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCR~E~ NERECN WILL BE DEVE.QPED AS A PL^~tiNED DEVELG~'MENT iN ACCORDANCE WITH THE US€~S, RESTRICTIQNS AND C'~NC TlQNS CONTAINED IN THIS PLAN, ANp AS MAY OTHERWISE BE REQUIREG BY SAW. FURTI-ER RECO~NiZE SHAT RECEPTIOP! NQ. THE FI~IAI DEVELOPMENT PLAN DOES NOT CREATE A VESTED PRi~PERTY `~GHT. VESTcD PROPERTY RIGHTS hgAY ONLY ARISE AND ACCi~UE PURSUANT TO THE PRt'J1SlONS 0~ SECTION THIS DOCUMENT ACCEPTED FUR FIIJNG IN THE OFFICE ~F iNE COUNTY CLERK ANC) 26-6(G} 0~ ARTICLE I OF THE CQOE aF MAWS OF THE CITY OF WHEAT R ~!GE. RECORDER OF JEfFEP,SON COl)NTY AT GG~DEN, COLORADO ON -fHE DAY OF ____--___A.D. 199__., IN THE BOOK PAGE ~ECEPTIQN tlh~lED CONTROL STATEMENT 1HE PROPERTY IS OWNED BY BAPTIST HQf~E ASSOCfATION OF THt RQCKY ~UNTAI~dS, iNC., A. COLORADO CORPORATION. TNT PROJECT OWNER, Sr~~'TIST HOME ASSOCIATION OF THE RC3CKY MOUNTAINS, SHALL f'R'~VIDED UNIFIED CC7NTR4L BY MAINTAIN#~1G A SINGLE MANAGEMENT THRC}UGN-OUT THE DEVELOPMENT PR~:)~ ~ SS. JEFFERSON COUNTY C!ERK ANi~ RECORDED M FLOYD N. HARRI~ON JR ~ JERRY L. DICKEY T 1. fiHE CWtiERS QF THE I;?RIGA1i0N DITCHES ~1HICH CROSS THIS SfTE A~tE: PRESIDENT/CHIEF cXECUTIVE OFFICER EXECUTIVE SECREIA~Y BY: DEPUTY WAQSW~}RTH DITCH CO"~~P^+NY C/0 NICK KELLER 431-835 6706 R~,LSTON ROAD ARVAD~, COLURApG 80fl02 STATE OF CO~ORAD~ ~ COUNTY Of JEFFERSON REV. 5-15-9~3 CITY CQMME~dTS 2. THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN 15 AN AMENCM~~rJT TO THE PR``G10US DEVEi_0~'MEN7 PLAN REV. 4-20-98 CITY COMME(~TS F~ECORDED UNDER RECEPTION NUMBER 97077010. THE FOREGQ4NG INSTi~'7MEN f VdAS ACKNOWtEDCED BEFORE ME THIS COY ~F 3. THIS PR(7JEC1 i5 NQT IMPRCTED BY A FLOCC? (~LA,1'~!. tgg__. A.D., BY FLOY[~ H. HARRISON ,R. AS PRE~ID~Nfi EXECUTIVE DIRECTS t~,tJu BY JERRY L. DICKEY AS EXECUTIVE SECRETARY OF BAPTiS~f HOME ASSOCIATIC3N OF THE ROCKY ~UNFA~NS, INC. 4. O~1TSI(~E AREA LIGN75 TO ~3E METAL HALIDE LAMPS AS PER C6TY CODE. WITNESS PAY HAND AND ~FFIClA~ SE.~'~. ~VI 5. Al.l. PRUPOSFD CON~iF~UCT10N TO COMMENCE I~ SPRING, 1998. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES ~:,DDR~ 5S 6. MO~JNTAIfV VISTA P,FTIREMENT WILLAGE IS ZGNED P(:;i1 - PLAN'~ED CJMM1~UNlTY DEVELOPMENT. ~ t _ 7. BEARINGS FARE E3A~ED bN fiHE EAS; LINE Q~ THE SOUTNEASi OF ~EC~iI(iN 17, BEAR{IVG N0016'00"W. THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECili1N 17 IS A FfliJND BRASS CAP (LS 1312) NOTARY PUBLIC SET IN .A RANGE (SOX, THE EAST CORNER OF SECTION 17 IS A FOUND BRASS CAP Qrawn/Ct,eckad Project Number (LS 13212) SE? IN A. RANGE BOX, RBT NaTE HOL.DERs: the+oRr~AGHs) Approved K,/ 9 7 U U 3,. Ur 8. THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT AFFECTS ONLY SOT 4 OF MOUNTAIN VISTA RETIREMENT VILLAGE 1. 1ST BANK Oy WHEAT RIDGE, A CQLCiR,^,.CFO CORPORATION U SUBDIVISION ALL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN LOTS 1, 21, 31 AND `Cl` tifiC)UN?AIN VISTA RETIREMENT VILLAGE 2. AMERICAN BA''1IaT EXTENSION COP, PiJ+A i_i"v, VALLEY FORGE, PENNSYV,4IA. SUBDIVISION SHALL BE ~C,NS?S{?ANT WI~fH THE PRE''J1UUS DFVF_i._i:if'MtNT PLAN RECORDED AT RECEPTION N0. 92077010. Issued for Bids Drawing Number 9. THERE ARE NO PROPOSED SIGNS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS DEVELOPMENT, scale: 1 UF 4-- 10. THE TRASH FACiLI EIES FOR THE ('ROFOSED UNITS WILL BE TREATED THE SAME WAY AS THE i_:XiSITiN; CASE I d0te, -30 UNITS. THIS CONSISTS OF A CONCRETE SLAB WITH 5'-10" WALLS a,ROI,+(VD THE PERIMETER FC~N r.REE~y!hJ". WL- 72-- r a r ~ r~ J~~ Revisions ~1 - - ~ _i ! ~ ~ I . ~ ~ ~.4 / ' OF WHEAT RIDGE i WEST, ~RAnn ~ `,.r f J~ . - ~ f - MnIINTATN VI,~~Ta RFTTRF, ~VIF, NT VTT,T,A w---- f,_. ~ FINAL DL'VELOPMENT PLAN 1F~MF1'~DMENT N0. II_. 1 ~ DE VEL 0~'ME1~jT PLAN IN THF, CITY LOT 4, MOUN'T'AIN VISTA RETIREMENT t~lLLAGE LOCATED IN SECT]ON 17 AND 20, 7'OFti'1VSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WE C7VTI7 DA~T7/`TDA7 A.f L~A7717A TT /'~Tmv n~ wuc~~m nin~c c~m~mt~ nc~ /'/17 /1D &'r h;, `,[_r a„~ v iR`~, ,ti's;. n, .P F I. ~ ~ i ~ r l ~ / ~1, t ~ PACK ~ ~ e 1 -0~ _ ~ , ~ f r ~ ,r f ~ ~ ~ r J ~K ~ h;,~ , ~ t 1 f ~ `r O V" y f r ~ E-----^ r/°,-^~ ~ . } t 1 f _ o ~ ~ , _ g ~ , tt ` ~ ` ` ~ ~ ~ ~ j ExIS PSG ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ f _ _ ~ ~ 0 r r ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ COVER D ~ { ~UI~~Ji~l~i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ PARKI G e . L..~ 1 { d .t, PAR. 1 ~ NG ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ j r ~ ~ j ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ a j ~ C/~ ~ ~ ~ ~ tPaz~car~c~) 4'~ i I ~ ~ r f fQ ! I l T q l f O t ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ t. ~ ~ f ~ 1 ~ ~ #d dui h a r'f r ~0.,~ ~ ~ r' ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ , I V I ~ ~ ~ T ,."t. f w . - - ~4: ~ ~ ~ , f f f I r ' ~ ~ ' ~ ~1 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ t. ~ ~ /7 f 1 7 ~ ~ .r ti i t S °1 c'~ ~a r^, i i •-r ~r r- r~ I ~ r~, r 4 e - y ~"I~.►~ ~ i ~ t ~ 's 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 ` , , -i ~ ~ ; ~ ~a S 89°16'25" W ~ ~ \ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 \ ~ ! 4 ~ Y O~ 20,Q4` ~ f~ ` ~ ~ tip, tz' i L=98.83 ~ ~ ~ ~T ~~~E \ R=3Q7.03 ~ ~ s 1~=1$'26'38" ~ ~ B=N 4fi 53'20" W \ \ ~ ~ C= 98.41 , ~ ` ~ \ ~s,~ LEGEND ~ ~ r` ~ • SET- P & C P.L.S. X2829? t3 ~~iUNI~ t/2" R~BA.R f / \ F~ID RANGE BOX P.L. S.'1321~ \ ~ # ~ SAhJITRR , '~~Ew'~.f2 MANHQLE r f r ~ \ ~ FND ALUM, CAP ILLEGIBLE Q STORM E)RAjtVAGE MANHOLE / ` ~ t~ FIRE NYQRF,Ni' xt PARKING LIGHT FIXTURE r~ .a.--""` ~ t~ POWER !'(ALE 6° 'JERT. CURB Lic GUTTER W/ Y - y Drawn/Checked Project Number ,4i~ ~ -y BUY ANCHOR 2' P RBT S7uRM SEWER LINE WATER VALVE f Approved 7, 0 0 3,, ss GAS METER SAN!TARI' SEWER ~iNE ~ ❑ PEDES s AL WATER LINE ~ iNLEfi • CLEAN CUT N. -ts- SIGN ~ TREE Issued for Bids Drawing Number ~ WATER METER ~ ~ItSHES - 2 F date 1_30-s8 1. ti~ V,., XR` MA NT LISA KEl' QTl'. GOt^'iMON NAME ~ZE nj ` ~ ~ ~ , 1 fIt~ i~ ~ ~t~ f1 s ~ ~F~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ 1 t 1 1,y ~ ~ ~ DECIDUOUS S~lADE TREES Ma 3 rrar~s~A~~ a~u ~-Z~,z.. i/ ~ ~ ~ ~ IHL 3 IMPERIAL NONE1'LOGt1ST 2-2'~i" i ~ ~ DEGIDI,IO~S SHRUBS ~ ~~J1 N5F 6 NORTI-TERN SUN FdRSYTI-I(A 5 CsAL. v I~KI- 6 L7WARF KrJREAN LILAC 5 CsAL. ~ , I ~ ~ r, EvER~REEN SNRt.IBS . SJ 41 SCANDIA JUNIPER 5 CsAL. ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ 1 NQTES: / ~ _ ~ \ 1. ALL DISTURBED LA~tlJN AREAS t0 BE RE-EStABLISHED i, / j f t1PON COh1PLEtiON OF CONSTRUCTI~1. / o^'_~ ~4~ ~ 2. ALL T~iEIU LAI~t AREAS t0 BE SODDED. 7~ ~ . N 0 ° 16' ~0 W g~3 ~B 3. .a~~ NEw ~~I aREas To BE iRR~GaTED. 5. OQ ~ ~ 1---- e \ \ , / 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ i~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ \ \ / , i F \ ~ "j ~ , I~ `i T x = 1[ K \ rI ~ r ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ Lam,- 1 yf,  1 ~ ~ 's'~v. ~ ~ PROPDSED DECIDUOUS SNRl.1BS z~~ :n ~~~c~ ~ ~ ~ 1 I ~ ~ ~ ♦ / ~ ~F~-/ ~ N~ ~ 9~ 5 ~ Q ~ e ~ + F ~ ~ 1 ' t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~4 ,c,~F/ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ EXI3TIPKs 2" PvC/GL 20m IRRICsATiON 3~`3TE ~ ) / g°' - ~ ( MAINLINE 1 ~ + I L ~ ~ , , ; r J ~ ~ ~~1 ~ o~`~ ~ ~ 1 { °GAT~~~ i T < NEt,U CONCREtE WALKS 1 \ ~ ~1 ~ ~ ~1 j j~'J ~ 1 ~ ~ / t~ , 1 ~ 1 i j I 1 ~ r ♦ r ~ ~ ~ 1 { ~ ~ U r . ~ ~ r DoT 4 , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f ICJ 1 ~ ~ (X~ ~ ~ ~ z 11 1 ! ~ ~ -1 ~ r-~- ,t T o l l 1 I L___-J / ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ I i ~ ~ l ~ t / ~ 1 ~ ~ I Y A 1 ' ~ I ~ 6 ~J~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1~ ~ ~ ~ S 89°16`25" W ~ ~ ~ Q,Q 6' \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ma EXISTING DRIV J \ ~ \ ~ ~ ' ~ 2 N5~ 9 SJ ~ ~ - ~-L_`, `:i ;i: P~DPO~ ~ x o i ~ 1 \ \ ~ . N 0 0 3 6 16 w~ 20.04' I ~ ~ ~=`,..._~.3.. - - ~ ~ ~ ~ L=98.83' ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~s s~ R=307,3' ~ ~ ~ 0=16'38„ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ B=N 43'20" W ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ C=98.41' ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ./1/' ~ ~ ~ ~ . r ~  BAC<FILL MATERIAL Drawn/Checked Protect Number F/C Approved K97003nOO P f ZZ Issued for Bids Drawing Number AAL' sca r e 90 r ~ date 2-13-98 _ ~ ~ ~ r 3. r:.~.~k , ` ~ r ~ ~ , a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ` ~ _ , ~'a> ~ _ 'ti `4 ~ _ ~ M . - f R ~ ~ Y~ ~ ~ 0 U ~ r C. i + ~ i 4 ~ 1 P"" ~ m r 9 i - - - ..mss r Y ~ a Q ~f w, f t s fi 1 R k i 1 a , , 4 f 9 t ~ ~ - i ~ ~ ~ # ~ • i., a p b 9 1 r 5 b i ~.vmw~..~e..,..,.,m ..w _ t a ~ h • ~ ' ~ i t ~1 ~ ~ t . ~ ~ f 9 i S ~ ~ E ° 4 , # i ~ ,i ~ s , I t µ ~ 4 A e E wlWS b w d pn nn •..rwrf AM1+14`NdM1!~ WsM4 Narx6 Y~Mr NV4 p+mes• +SMNArt ffiWn4W~FP fl9MRlYM aWkAl ~+tYW+ dpMM+M 6IURbY MMps+Y yµWq Y~AMWMM AVYr!W +wiar.w If111Prw 9nOyr Mf pMyp Wrww ~W6i 4*~~r^+M hmsla~li w+u~rtdbn r i~'{s* .m...a rlY wrre +e~ 4+a~ snOWae+W barwm yq ~~ut ami W w~+w.ab .~p~w ~ J t ~ weu~+ ~:~eWWW .!u& Wawti•-rp.:. asrumrw~A>u~. r..-n.~mrw } F 9 e,; A . 1 tr .R G ¢ t ♦ Y i ~ _.,p.~n,~m u9Au*~tr!.+4HniB ~r~v .:..i.., ~ ~.r..r,,.. ~rzkn~.~t..w:.nal~nK+3llc'^r ~w.uuw._._ ...wnKkn^^+vww e++•,mrsa-wu .,ec .n.,+-xFw-..+... ~'"m"-",R { b + ~ a € ~ t E ~1 ~ j' ~ ~ S d ~ ~ , y~ s . ~ ~ I' t ~ 7 e ( ~ t ~ i. ~ 4 j !f ~ P - 1. 1 1 ~ 1 d f ~ ~i)~ 5 # E9 ~ }p ~.r { ( 3 i ,k..., „ wwq . ,~,r .~i'v ~ t ~v...a...... a..Jc. s E e~..;.,.~.,.H,a :x: wuuww aw ,ws a a~~,.... ~w«»~ awe w~.~. a*+w «s ,«r, ~ , . s ; _ _ ` ~ ~..P~,~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ z t fi. . 'A o: * 1 y., w P' F ~ ~ Y~ ` y µ ~'IIF, .r 1 ~ ~ - ' ~ * ~ A ~ y aC . ~ t' d ' ~ r. . , ~ ~ * ) A ti ~ Y ~ ~ t '4 ' ' } t t e a4 a. f,. b t l,,. e w. _ ' ' , t"; ,~~t. f ' ~ ~ ~ r - ~ a 6 ~ - 1 P ~ ~ ` y ~ x i 3 B I ~ r. pr P y f ~ § t f r - 9 i  t ^ w. .e vroject, Number a AF-M F K 9 7 0 0 s . 9 DDrawing Number , a i m. y ` N~". s s 1 - ~ A - _ ~ ` ~l~ , a i - f_ la r , ..-u!44.v' ~ ' ' i ~ y , -.:q ..-w.._.~.. R 3'Oi1Nl.~rt i~FlG.mt.'-.. ~~l1iL~111 f CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO: City Council DATE OF MEETING: June 22, 1998 DATE PREPARED,:: June 8, 1998 CASE NO. & NAME: WZ-98-6/Mountain Vista CASE MANAGER: M. Reckert ACTION REQUESTED: PCD Final Plan Amendment with Variance LOCATION OF REQUEST: 4700 Tabor Street NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT(S): Mountain Vista Retirement Village 4800 Tabor Street NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER(S): Baptist Home Assoc. Of the Rockies 5280 Vivian Street Arvada, CO 80002 APPROXIMATE AREA: PRESENT ZONING: PRESENT LAND USE: SURROUNDING ZONING: SURROUNDING LAND USE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE AREA: 5.46 Acres Planned Commercial Development Nursing Home, Independent Living N: I, S: A-1, E: PID, W: PID N, E,: Commercial, W: Commercial, Vacant, S: 1-70 Industrial DATE PUBLISHED: June 5, 1998 DATE POSTED: June 8, 1998 DATED LEGAL NOTICES SENT: - June 4, 1998 - ENTER INTO RECORD: - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) ZONING ORDINANCE Q SLIDES SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS (X) EXHIBITS Q OTHER JURISDICTION: The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge and all notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. I. REQUEST The applicant requests approval of an amendment to the Mountain Vista Retirement Village Planned Commercial Development Plan final development plan with a setback variance. The purpose of the request is for the addition of six independent living units and carports for property located at 4700 Tabor Street (Vista Village Retirement Community). II. CASE HISTORY The property in question was rezoned from PRD, A-2 and Industrial to Planned Commercial Development with an outline development plan and final development plan and plat approvals pursuant to Case Nos. WZ-87-4 and WZ-90-11. At the time of rezoning, the nursing home was in existence on the north side of the property with 41 independent living units in place on the south side. An addition to west side of the nursing home structure was completed in 1993. The outline plan allowed for a total of 47 independent living units where only 41 were existing. The applicant is requesting approval of this request to add six additional units plus coverage of the existing parking spaces with carports and new parking. III. AGENCY REFERRALS Valley Water District is working with the applicant to resolve service issues. Additional main line extensions with looping will be required with appropriate easements. Additional water service lines and tap fees will be required for the new units. Public Works has reviewed and approved an amended drainage report. No public improvements will be required. The traffic division has no comments. Police Department has commented relative to crime prevention. Their comments have been forwarded to the applicant. Arvada Fire Protection District will require an additional fire hydrant in the vicinity of the new units in the southwest corner of the property. Water line looping will be required. The Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed this request and has recommended a 5% land dedication requirement. Staff would note that since this is not a subdivision, the parks Commission has no authority, to require the dedication. IV. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN The applicant is proposing a final development plan which allows for the construction of six independent living units in three duplex buildings plus coverage of all open parking with carport Page 2 structures. Two of the duplex buildings would be located at the very southwest corner of the property with carport structures. These buildings will displace maintenance buildings which. were recently removed. Setback variances are required for the carports and the eastern structure. The eastern building has been shifted northeast to reduce the amount of variance needed. The other duplex building is proposed for the northeast portion of the site where there are two existing structures with nine units. The new building will displacing existing parking (nine spaces), drive area and landscaping. The displaced parking will be relocated in front of the southern building in the cluster with two additional spaces in front of the new units plus one handicapped space for a total of 12 within this cluster of buildings. Staff is somewhat concerned for crowding between the western building and the new units as they will be roughly 30' apart. Staff has calculated the number of parking spaces based on the following: 27 existing bedroom units x 1.25 spaces = 34 spaces 14 existing 2 bedroom units x 1.5 spaces = 21 spaces 6 new 2 bedroom units x 1.5 spaces = 9 spaces TOTAL REQUIRED: 64 spaces The development shows a total of 64 parking spaces. No overflow parking is required. In addition, the proposed construction will match existing architectural style and material currently used. If the proposed amendment is approved, building coverage will be 37%, hard surfaced coverage will be 28% and landscaped coverage will be 34%. These figures are consistent with the underlying outline development plan. V. VARIANCE CRITERIA SETBACK The required side yard setback next to a street is 30'. The required front yard setback for any structure is required to be a minimum of 50'. However, if the structure is less than 35' in height and the front yard is completely landscaped, this setback can be reduced down to 30'. The property is addressed to Tabor Street and has an access from Tabor, although the main entrance for the development is from the I-70 service road. In any event, the setback along the frontage road is required to be 30' where only 14.5' setback is provided from one of the new structures and a 6' setback from the carports at the southwest corner of the property. As such, specific variances of 15' and 24' are required. The applicant has submitted a written justification to support the request for variance included under Exhibit `B'. Staff would note that there was a structure with a non-conforming setback in this area which was removed. Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a variance request: WZ-98-6 1. Can the property in question yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located? If the variance is not granted, the property can still be used for independent living. Alternate locations for the new units is limited because of severe slopes along the southwest, west and northwest property lines. There was a structure in this location with a non-conforming setback. 2. Is the plight of the owner due to unique circumstances? Circumstances are somewhat unique because of the severe slopes on the property. 3. If the variation were granted, would it alter the essential character of the locality? In 1987, the I-70 frontage was realigned and reconstructed adjacent to Vista Village on the south and west sides. No additional right-of-way was obtained from Vista Village although there was a permanent slope easement dedicated to the City. This slope easement is located opposite of the intersection of Tabor Street with the frontage road. It is located to the west of the buildings where variances are needed. There is excess right-of-way between the southern property line of Vista Village and the physical improvements for the I-70 frontage road. This right-of-way varies in width from 5' at the very southwest corner of the property to 40' at the southwest corner of the western most carport structure. There is 60' of excess right-of-way adjacent to the duplex structure needing the variance. Because of the excess right-of-way, staff concludes that there would not be a negative affect on the character of the area because visually, the new structures appear to be setback an appropriate amount from the roadway. The area used as excess right-of-way will never be developed and should not be needed for future frontage road improvements. 4. Would the particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved result in a particular hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out? There is somewhat of a hardship because of slopes on the property and the excessive right-of-way on the south. There are alternatives available such as not providing covered parking. The applicant has shifted the easterly building to the northwest as far as possible. WZ-98-6 5. Would the conditions upon which the petition for a variation is based be applicable, generally, to the other property within the same zoning classification? A precedent could be established for similar requests if no findings of hardship or unique circumstances are made. 6. Is the purpose of the variation based exclusively upon a desire to make money out of the property The purpose of the variance is to build additional units and to provide covered parking. 7. Has the alleged difficulty or hardship been created by any person presently having an interest in the property? The hardship has been self-imposed. Alternatives available include not having covered parking in this area. The applicant has already shifted the eastern building as far to the northwest as possible. 8. Would the granting of the variations be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located? Granting of the variance would be not be detrimental to the public welfare as there is adequate fire access and a substantial separation from the frontage road improvements. 9. Would the proposed variation impair the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion in the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. There should be no impact on the amount of light and air because there are no adjacent structures which would be affected. The variance would not increase congestion in the public street . Adequate provisions for fire safety are made with the installation of a new hydrant in this vicinity. It is impossible for staff to ascertain whether there will be a negative affect on property values in the neighborhood. 10. If it is found in criteria 8 and 9 above that granting of the variation would not be detrimental or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood, and it is also found that public health and safety, public facilities and surrounding property values would not be diminished or impaired, then would the granting of the variance result in a benefit or contribution to the neighborhood or the community as distinguished from an individual benefit on the part of the applicant, or would granting of the variance result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities? Page 5 The benefit of the new units is additional affordable housing for elderly persons in the area regardless of whether or not the variance is granted. To Staff's knowledge, approval of the variance would not result in an accommodation to persons with a disability VI. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The Planning Commission reviewed this request at a public hearing held on May 7, 1998. In regard to the setback variance, a motion was made to recommend approval for the following reasons: 1. A variance is required to allow construction on the property as shown on the development plan. 2. The topography of the site and the excess right-of-way along the frontage road have created unique circumstances so that there actually is sufficient ground between the proposed buildings and the road. In regard to the final development plan, a motion was made for approval for the following reasons: 1. The proposal is consistent with the underlying outline development plan. 2. All requirements for a PCD plan amendment have been met. With the following conditions: 1. No parking be allowed along the northeast curve adjacent to Building No. 5. 2. That handicapped parking space be moved to a safer location as approved by the Planning Director. The conditions specified above have been incorporated into the plan. An additional motion was made for approval of a variance to the number of parking spaces. The motion failed. The applicant has added additional spaces into the plan negating the need for a variance. VII. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION Staff concludes that setback variances are required to allow construction on the property as shown on the final development plan. Staff further concludes that the topography of the site and excess right-of-way along the frontage road have created unique circumstances regarding placement for the new structures. For these reasons, a recommendation of approval is given for the variance for setback. Page In regard to the amendment to the final development plan, staff concludes the proposal is consistent with the underlying outline development plan and that all requirements for a PCD plan amendment have been met. For these reasons, a recommendation of approval is given. VIII. RECOMMENDED MOTIONS VARIANCE - SETBACK Option A: "I move that the request for approval of setback variances next to the right-of-way for property located at 4700 Tabor Street be APPROVED for the following reasons: 1. A variance is required to allow construction on the property as shown on the development plan. 2. The topography of the site and the excess right-of-way along the frontage road have created unique circumstances. Option B: "I move that the request for approval of a setback variance next right-of-way for property located at 4700 Tabor Street be DENIED for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3." FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Option A: "I move that Case No. WZ-98-6, a request for approval of an amendment to a Planned Commercial final development plan for property located at 4700 Tabor Street, be APPROVED for the following reasons: 1. The proposal is consistent with the underlying outline development plan. 2. All requirements for a PCD plan amendment have been met. Option B: "I move that Case No. WZ-98-6, a request for approval of an amendment to a Planned Commercial final development plan for property located at 4700 Tabor Street, be DENIED for the following reasons: I. 2. 3." C:\Bwbara\PCRPTS\WZ986. WPD Page 7 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the April 16, 1998, Wheat Ridge Planning Commission were presented for approval. Commissioner SNOW requested the following amendments: Page 12, item 1 should be amended to read: "Concern was expressed as to whether the type of advertisement on bus shelters could be strictly enforced in regard to objectionable content in light of the First Amendment; and that staff be directed to consult with the city attorney as to an opinion on this issue." Page 12, item 3 should be amended to read: "That the shelters be placed in all zone districts; and that in residential districts they be restricted to properties where uses include churches, schools, libraries, other public facilities and vacant land." It was moved by Commissioner GOKEY and seconded by Commissioner SNOW to approve the minutes as amended. The motion carried by a vote of 6-0, with Commissioner DUNN absent. 6. PUBLIC FORUM There was no one signed up to speak before the Commission. PUBLIC HEARING Chair THOMPSON declared the public hearing open. A. Case No. WZ-98-6/Mountain Vista: An application by Baptist Home Association of the Rocky Mountains, Inc. for approval of an amendment to the Mountain Vista Retirement Village Planned Commercial Development (PCD) final development plan, with variances, for the construction of three duplex units (six independent living units) located at 4700 Tabor Street, Wheat Ridge, CO.- Meredith Reckert presented the case as described above; and entered the zoning ordinance, case file and packet materials into the record. She advised that the property was within the City of Wheat Ridge, that all notification and posting requirements had been met, and there was jurisdiction to hear the case. Ms. Reckert reviewed the staff report and noted the report had been modified to reflect that the correct number of existing units within the development was 41 rather than 31 which was incorrectly stated in the final development plan submitted to staff. She informed that the final development plan proposed construction of three duplex buildings plus coverage of all open parking with carport structures. Two of the duplex buildings would be located at the very southwest corner of the property with carport structures and would displace existing Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 May 7, 1998 maintenance buildings. Setback variances would be required for the carports and the eastern structure (which had been shifted northwest to reduce the amount of variance needed.) The third duplex building would be located in the northwest portion of the site and would displace nine existing parking spaces, drive area and landscaping. The displaced parking would be relocated in front of the southern building. There would also be a need for a variance to allow 62 parking spaces rather than the 64 required by code. Ms. Reckert informed that staff made recommendations for overflow parking to be provided throughout the project and for a pedestrian link to be installed between the north and south parts of the development. Ms. Reckert reviewed the variance criteria advising that required setback criteria from property line is 30 feet and the applicant was showing the most southern building as being 14.5 feet from southern property line. Carports in same area have setbacks of about six feet; therefore the setback variances request were for 15.5 feet and 24 feet. She reviewed the criteria used to evaluate a variance request and informed that staff recommended approval due to unique circumstances of slopes on the property and the excessive right-of-way along the frontage road. Ms. Reckert informed that staff recommended denial of the variance request which would allow 62 parking spaces instead of the 64 spaces required by code because there were other alternatives for parking available to the applicant. Questions and discussion followed. Commissioner SNOW stated that it was her recollection that the applicant had donated land to the Highway Department and referred to the ordinance which says that a land use does not become nonconforming if government action caused the problem. She asked if the Highway Department could grant the land back to the applicant. Ms. Reckert replied that the Highway Department rarely vacates any right-of-way. Commissioner SNOW requested an amendment to the map that would replace the words "Planned Community Development" with "Planned Commercial Development" Commissioner SNOW asked if they are losing parking spaces because covered areas are larger or because of the construction. Ms. Reckert replied that it was due to construction which would displace parking around one of the buildings. Commissioner GOKEY asked how many residents had automobiles. Ms. Reckert replied that although many residents do not own vehicles, the City must still follow the standards. Commissioner GOKEY asked if the drainage study was based, upon the additional parking spots. Ms. Reckert explained that the applicant had an original drainage report for the overall site including the south side and did an addendum to original report for the new structures. Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 May 7, 1998 Chair THOMPSON expressed concern about visitors parking along the south curve causing restricted traffic flow. Ms. Reckert stated that her concern would be in regard to fire access. Commissioner SHOCKLEY asked if the city had considered any guard railing where Tabor from 44th comes up from the service road and directly across the street. Ms. Reckert explained that the State has jurisdiction in this matter but the City could make a recommendation for guard railings. Following further discussion, the applicant addressed the Commission. Ronald Heselton 7682 Saulsbury Street, Arvada, CO Mr. Heselton was sworn by Chair THOMPSON. He stated that he was Director of Special Projects with the Baptist Home Association and that he was representing Floyd Harrison. He informed that the Association would support any recommendations made by the Planning Commission. He stated that they were willing to go along with two additional parking spaces, but expressed surprise about the recommendation for a pedestrian walkway to connect the north and south areas because of the steep incline in that area. He informed that there was a bus to transport residents from the community center to the nursing home and that some residents also have their own cars. He stated that the parking spaces are usually half full and the only time there was a need for additional parking was during special events such as the monthly potluck and, at those times, people park along the south area opposite the parking spaces and still keep a clear lane of traffic flow. He requested that the Commission grant the variances in order for the Association to proceed with their project and noted that they wish to increase capacity because there is a two-year waiting list on the present buildings. Commissioner GOKEY referred to the pedestrian walkway and asked what the percentage of incline was where the walkway was proposed. Mr. Heselton replied that he estimated it to be 40%. Commissioner SNOW informed that ADA requires no more than 8.33%. In response to questions from Commissioner GOKEY, Mr. Heselton explained that they have not experienced any problems with drainage; that the units were built on concrete slabs; and that an estimated 10% of the residents used wheelchairs. Commissioner SNOW expressed concern that more handicapped parking spaces should be provided. Mr. Heselton explained that there are vans from such places as Denver Mobility which transport residents and that the Association also has a large van for this purpose. He also noted that none of the residents own handicapped vans. COLLINS asked why, with a two-year waiting list, they were not considering more than six units. Mr. Heselton replied that this was due to the land use issue and also that they were trying to create a continuum of care with an assisted living program connected to the nursing home where the present residents could be accommodated into assisted living and then into the nursing home as the needed. Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 May 7, 1998 Commissioner BRIN MAN expressed concerns about building "C" being squeezed into such a small area and suggested that the building be moved to the top northwest corner. Mr. Heselton replied that relocation would be extremely difficult because of the slope of the area. Commissioner BRINKMAN stated that she was not pleased with the location of the buildings having only 30 feet separation between buildings, and expressed concern that there was no buffering between that structure and the commercial building to the east. She suggested that buildings A and B contain another unit and eliminate the need for the third building. Mr. Heselton replied that while he appreciated her concerns, the buildings open up onto a central courtyard and that other buildings in the area face I-70 noise levels. He stated that they have tried to accommodate everything they needed into the best locations they could. Commissioner THOMPSON mentioned that patio homes in the new development off of 38th Avenue have only ten-foot separations. Ms. Reckert informed that the standard front setback requirement for new homes is thirty feet. Commissioner SNOW mentioned that single family homes have combined side yard setbacks of only 15 feet. She asked the applicant if it would be possible to make the structure smaller by having one one-bedroom unit and one two-bed room unit rather than having two two-bedroom units. Ms. Heselton replied that they like to provide two-bedroom units for the residents to provide for visitors. Commissioner GOKEY suggested making wider handicapped spaces for side loading vans. Chair THOMPSON suggested that handicapped spaces also be covered. Commissioner SNOW moved and Commissioner SHOCKLEY seconded to recommend that the City Council APPROVE that the request for approval of a setback variance next to right- of-way for property located at 4700 Tabor Street for the following reasons: 1. A variance is required to allow construction on the property as shown on the development plan. 2. The topography of the site and the excess right-of-way along the frontage road have created unique circumstances so that there actually is sufficient ground between the proposed buildings and the road. 3. The buildings that were in this location prior to this time were also within the required setback and there have been no problems. Planning Commission Minutes May 7, 1998 4. A hardship does exist in that it is important to save the existing mature trees which help prevent slope erosion as well as lessen the interstate highway noise and also to alleviate the impact on the open space. The motion carried by a vote of 6-0 with Commissioner DUNN absent. Commissioner SNOW moved and Commissioner GOKEY seconded to recommend to City Council that Case No. WZ-98-6, a request for approval of an amendment to a Planned community final plan for property located at 4700 Tabor Street, be APPROVED for the following reasons: 1. The proposal is consistent with the underlying outline development plan. 2. All requirements for a PCD plan amendment have been met. With the following conditions: No parking be allowed along the northeast curve adjacent to building no. 5. 2. That handicapped parking space be moved to a safer location as approved by the planning director. Commissioner BRINKMAN stated that she would vote against the motion because of the close proximity of Building C to the road and to the other buildings and also because residents of Building 5 would have to walk farther to get to their cars. She stated that it was her opinion there is room to expand buildings A and B or to relocate the building somewhere else. Commissioner GOKEY commented that he did not want to see any further development on this site and asked if there were additional buildings proposed for in the future. Ms. Reckert replied that there would be no density left for additional buildings unless there was a rezoning process. The motion carried by a vote of 5 to 1, Commissioner BRINKMAN voting no and Commissioner DUNN absent. It was moved by Commissioner SNOW and seconded by Commissioner GOKEY to recommend that the City Council APPROVE the request for approval of a parking variance for property located at 4700 Tabor Street for the following reasons: Because of the age of the applicants and the less than average number of cars owned, parking spaces are rarely filled except for a once-a-month event. 2. Adding parking spaces would decrease the amount of landscaping available. 3. Commission does not wish to consider this as establishment of a precedent for dissimilar properties. This property is unique in that it is one of the few providing affordable housing for seniors and because of the relative senior age of the residents. Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 May 7, 1998 Commissioner COLLINS stated that he did not feel the Commission should risk setting a precedent over two parking spaces. The motion failed by a vote of 3 to 3, with Commissioners BRINKMAN, COLLINS and SHOCKLEY voting no, and Commissioner DUNN absent. Chair THOMPSON declared a recess at 9:00 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 9:05 p.m. B. Case No. WZ-98-9: An application from Daniel J. Mahoney for approval to rezone property located at 6185 West 38th Avenue from Residential-Three to Restricted Commercial. The case was presented by Meredith Reckert. She entered the comprehensive plan, zoning ordinance, case file, packet materials and exhibits into the record. She informed that the property was within the City of Wheat Ridge; that all notification and posting requirements had been met and there was jurisdiction to hear the case. Ms. Reckert informed that the purpose of the rezoning was for conversion of the building to a commercial use. The applicant currently resides on the property and, if rezoning is approved, the structure would be converted into a commercial office or a live/work situation where the owner would reside on the top floor and maintain an office in the lower level. She noted that if the property were redeveloped with the current zoning, four multi-family units would be allowed on the property. She advised that there was adequate graveled parking and drive area for the conversion; however to meet commercial standards these areas would have to be paved. Ms. Reckert informed that a neighborhood meeting was held on March 24, 1998 where one neighbor (Angela Cheer, 6165 West 38th Avenue) attended and stated that she did not object to the rezone as long as offensive uses such as liquor sales or adult entertainment were not allowed. Ms. Reckert pointed out that RC zoning does not allow these uses. Ms. Reckert reviewed the agency referrals and rezoning criteria and stated that it was staff s conclusion that the proposed rezoning was consistent with the existing Comprehensive Plan and adjacent land use on the east and west. Staff further concluded that there was existing solid fencing and landscaping along the northern property line for buffering for adjacent residential property and therefore recommended approval with the condition that the gravel driveway and parking area be paved. Commissioner BRINKMAN asked if the entire parking lot would have to be paved. Ms. Reckert replied that only the ten parking spaces and driveway would have to be paved. Commissioner BRINKMAN asked if it would set a precedent to allow the owner to leave the gravel parking lot under the current use, but require paving if the use were to change to full commercial use. Ms. Reckert stated that it could be utilized with the present live/work situation without the paving. Planning Commission Minutes May 7, 1998 9/ 7- \A / A REPLAT OF LOTS 18, 19, 20 do 21 OF LEE'S SUBDIVISION IN THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 20 AND THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST, OF THE 6th PRINCIPLE MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO CMRACTER STATER FIF SHEET 1 OF 5 THIS PROJECT PROPOSES SHE CONSTRUCTION OP A BID. QUALITY. ARCHITECSUNALLT COORDINATED. ELDERLY CAPE FACILITY CZ A 15 ACAL ZEOV ALL NL ET TAKEN "nnng SV< tie uaeestpN. Bela{ tie PH0PARTY LOCATED OZ !RE SOUTHEAST CORNER OZ WEST 49TI AYE)UC III TABOR STREET IN TRI ZIST OZ YBEAS RIJL[. Of a ty.oX of lee. I...led to X.e voKHeut tYtteT Of IIee<tee E0. & ad tie teY\Yat euvtor of Section IT, P-41, ) SHL MAJORITY OZ THE PROPOSED DEVELCPNLNT IS LOCATED 0) !AT IIOYtI, NYp 69 TYt .f tie IIX,tl n1vt1P1 Meridiem. mall tract YOASHLPI P TA[ PROPERTY ADSACEIT CCORpI}A?HD VITA Mft{ a pOKfem el lots 16, IN. 2O. u. IN Of Luse Eetal,LfOa. AD7 OF !E[ EZISTI AB NO Tm VISTA PETIRCMCK C TO Av➢ CMMVNITI, An t\e C Or Ylemt EId{e. COevtN of Ielnre0a, State Of Colorado. AeaerfDea no fell..] 661AAOUS PLRIMLSLR LAR➢SCAPIZC. OPEN SPACE, AID BUILDING SET9.C[3 L HAVE BEEN PROVIDE C OB ALL SIDES LP TEL PIOPLRTT IR ORDER TO H1L HvOtmlof BUTTER ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND TO GERAIS A QUALITY ENVIRONMENT L1. [v, P YITBII THE PROJECT. TER DRIVES AR➢ pARR:LG NAY, SAE. OF..... I :J I.. 1 AlLOV FOR CLEAR CIRCULATION VIIe:I IRE PAOJgCT. AS WELL AS SLPAAASIOR OF PCDCSTPSAI AID YZNIC'JLAR TRAFFIC. _ R THE MATERIALS USED II THE CORSTAV<TSCR OT 79:5 FACILITY WILL EL :e[ [rtr -ton v1. v:KRr[~..K x rlam.rc CC III START IN COLOR AND T[ITVAE -TIN TAZ EXISTING 3UILDIALS CB r.,E (e) C'..wYi. TNC PROPERTt. FOR EXAMPLE: BR:CE- V SHALL REFLECT e'. . I. STYLE OF FAR QUALTT C; COMPLEX AATL OBIS B SEE. ESTA L:SALpv 94C0 o.RES:DEXTIAL' EPR 1. Td[ tv<u) Y .1 SSlIG32iw OI:C6f w.[s CMi 1.1 i.T .u. _ _ EVIOUS CT:NG PHASES OF COISTROCTICN. THE PC019 WILL BCT)O WI-H T9i L: .'vOq SIU COOAR [/v .iYI.:N C[ITh., >,n._P °ICn Xms i ae .a 1. C. OP })1 OF X[ STAG MOONSAII YTBTA PL.,AmN )T C...I .ITT pS.:aK[ Y e... r.[i . . AFYY, (piGU(O i...] (xl s 0x'.5 u, ..]55rc(Y .xs.e. rt[.. TEE FINAL LAYOUT AID ORILITATIOI 01 IRE )VILD:IC POOTPR:)TS SHALL LS SLSICN[0 TO ALLOY FOR All C)COINALL T9E )')D 01 P,-JLSTA:AI rA.m my csvm cry Cm or unxs (y - x )CT IV8 IIRCPLRT TO THIS TYPE OF ALT:YCPLRT CCMNW ITi. 431-101, a,[ (owx vAVmn 3[TV (vom C/o ua uua ii-aill (.I x co 'XiT . v m,xr :n aK -I IF CIRTITICATL BURRTOP3 AmS(. m[axw (oom -.<^.v a.a(Y vm (e( 5.. 1. part, L. ft.-. a. Face) <.,il" o.t t1..v,q .L x. Fil. xnmxme AN LOUT OcmD((T~a Ra [5) 5 cilT _ Mx P t1e bul.rl .f Pvut.fv 'let. Svtlr..t Illla{. - TIII.L Iv. 1 INGIN I. NOR •,0] a. N[p m x .r a✓E xw Cr -K r . n[. )NRtT 1. 5t ➢OLLSty By A . FLA.. (OU.rx It rt(0os Yder AS, direct (..pva.llllitl. uper,i.f a.. .vd a . .1. sv at xs. tut 12(34 .u:ai yoi u x12 ::-r x(e L Or n.<ll... A.....F..... ..tl .II .,Axis.\1. C.L.t.a. ®1 , ~yiIIi 1. . Facet. Stary,rocyl. YX 1. S. l S4t.t... a ut FvbN "It AOq .-afVd. ata.GT[a m Camel No mn xw ..a Hea m _ S7 :D _ STEP.V at ~ a J. aryl. FUJACE 1.. FOX KR - Y w- x - DM-X. L. 1-as e 4 - F a rut s 53 - Li. la. 5112 N ` XO(RGt( I/( wO.. IF Yu1 ..C .'0. : x i I. rocia of 5¢T l i -K aorxr ci tPPN01[9r AUMV Lu t i. G Foa. Avui e cGVUnfuiav l/ XG.x.lw. (wrslxlxG I-Il rms Mz w L(as. GAF IN )rJi., iu I. L .LaR not. ineenty ANN rayicryca~ CoAXISFYIN I call .l. note CASE AYBTO.Y YL-TTOH VE-65-A Yi-6T-A I~ MOUNTAIN VISTA RETIREMENT VILLAGE FINALS DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PLAT Man AXINT. LOT i. Been it, tat, )Ot ~iruuR 3 5 e al,Poa-x,s 33•.I.v-115 l 1®I. pw9[c con. ..1. 0 I.aaPl35 a.113-•N 4.120-]•5 3.4 .xx3 A'. . 3-lI\ ,,.xN-]35 I c e l ®543[ 1212 •I.SDO ,IOF..\ 44.•00-4T ]].•IP335 S OT • n a.N 3. 3 ul. le. N.oo.-IU i._yb]n .Si. L.rpO ,,l s "..x3-x0a Yla\ N,l _ Lo r l.. N » lIt n;.Ji, S, y Be. laid at. 'Jetted .Y ..wxvtaw tl. .b. ...erilN lead. a...F tie N no, .t)1. of Me Me 1. Tlmta Net lruut "]1.. le. 1 ~.d tleao pVY.tl do A'Velt .ad < e.q . tL Clt, of ..at Rid{.. Caor.d.. A.I .treat. torllle u.. Y111t, ..d etbF Y..-at. o..\o. e. lH. rlet. OWNER: TB[ L)TIRC PROPERTY IS GRAND HT BAPTIST ROME ASSOCIATION 01 THE ECLAT MOUNTAINS,. A COLORADO CORPORATIO.. STATLMLRT OF UTIITL➢ CONTROL: THR PROJECT OWNER. IAPTIST IOME BSSOCIATIOA OF CML ROCLT MOULTAIL9. SMALL PROVIDE UNITIES C1.111L IT MA i.IA1R:LC A CIRCLE MXAAXAAGEMEXTT /THROO/UU..--.OUST TA/[X DEVELOPMENT PSOCCSS, (,p* R ...A / SAT ICECT PHi3IDEAT/CHIBF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ICCUT L SECAITAR~ STATE OF COLORADO SH COUNTY 01 JEFFERSON ) TEE FOLLLOIAO SHSTAIIMLIT WAS ACXLOVLCOCED BEFORE ML THIS Z Q. SAT OF 199E A.D.. BY FLOOD A. AARMISOH JP. AS PPESIDEIT -ILCUTIVE DIRECTOR AID IT JERRY L. DICXET AS LIFCUTIYL 3LCRtTART OF BAPTIST HOME ASSOCIATION OF THE BOCMT /M~OUITAIIS, VITmSS MT HAND AID OFFICIAL REAL. " /15]^ MI comi.S201 RETIRES 1-1$-QS AOTART PVH OT00 Tee °l 6N~ 12 ;DDAesRd C 4FD 33 YoIE ..XAMMS: (MORIlGAG."I 1. AMAHICAN BAPPIn EXTENSION CORPORATION, A NEW YOUR CORTGRATION (LOTS 1 AND 4) 2. ILT NAME OF WHAT RIDGE, A COIOHADO CORPORATION (LOT 41 do'•n, i! AACNITECT: [ABC. DVRRS . ASSOCIATES. P.C, 1201 16TI STRAIT SUITE '00 v ` OERYRR. COLGAN. 60202 110I1LCR: L JEAN A ASSOCIATES. 'IC. 5695 TUNoI STREET BIT[ C I,IAOA. COLORADO E0002 4l CStr or Wkes, r ltdp - vii.etee or mss. YeK. tVA.-L.. ~...~-l. euN f YYt ap - Ky Le.l eoF Yeut.fv tat- V.I TA ...v. 5.1~.1aYpp\ V ex A'.d1.1 OA... C,-, IT e[ Yle.t Lld6. - Heiruv F nK...a R.crYtlov CoYlYba f.xt< N.ra<. teepee) ar eoler.ae r 4 St SYC). Dttc\ CemY.T it. Bitch C..za-, FLAEEVa CONXISSIOX CERTIFICATE SRIS la to urUry tla Atlfa out An. to.. ......an eT tB. tLa.ANN C.YUOten of tie city of Ytut/.f)a BOA. Col.-,.. YAYOE•A CEETIRC.TL Ill. fe to <.KiFF tBat t\. CIXI oC alut Rlap, Colorado. Vy Nation of It% city couell aid an t.a _jf,_'~"dy of Tt-aa.. 19P. adopt u..AF- t\o .Act,. Flat one --ye V.. 4N1<.tlou larua Y... ACUPTED FOR PILING n THt OFFICE OF SHE COUNTY CIdm ISO MECORDER OF JEFFE950N COWNTY AS COLDER. COLD UDO ON ]Nis IN. DAY OF (1LLV.2- 1~AS CLCLCEP lT7 fd1.NR.3t ~r! JEL:Fj.tSON C04 TY RF AN. -0-41t -3Y! DE24IY goaIQ!1) P.G.pt:3.. N~p~ - I f P T\ 5k lo9 p$ ---04 RE " 9aoZzo10 N [ OM l4Q~ l d~~~Q REMEHL 7 MQLLME ci 1 OH&L BEWELOPHEH7 PLt%H ° AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE g« \ T]S R69Y s ~ BEING =A PORTION OF LEE'S SUBDIVISION IN THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 20 AND THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, i 4a 0 m b w . RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6th PRINCIPLE MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO WEAT RIDGE WW MK PMK [AST IIS snni tT pmo+Ai 9cAlE t'.aD' A 500'16'00•E _990_58 8 411.32 - - -T- - - 198.51 370.74' ~q 4 ; \ Z EXISTING m t R=44' DETENTION A3951ID POND , /T-\ 1 PRa-a!ZD P.44' GRASSED AREA UNNO - \ °o ~e p i -\2 ma u.cs+T...x Il OVERFLOW PARKING LW7S i S t^ Q~i I O\ pm DE7ENOpT POND 'A' LOT 3 no ~qE,~ I' m 8D"' ICI r IY I. ®~III~ I~ I ~ I I ~ I \ 71 w D .c 73.55' \ I I I a I`. III I I=I ~ I ~ I I~ 4 ~ I. I F Pomo I U MADO WBNYAY , MpmwF T LOT 4 Al I \ I NSTA NLLAGE Manx 17 1 ELDERL Y RO/5/NL t 21 PROPOSED BUILDING ADD177ON r G'i-` I I / ~I / -Z-- LOT B LOT 3 500'45'06'E 0% [ ¢ --I o~•4 Q. b I 13905' ~ tsar ~'~OIL / I 1 uar 1 I 4 Ayy~, I .CJ SZ no. wu¢ wz ~ d J°~'f~ ~0. ^I O. I I I Q~^ rae - / 'fin " I~ ! - ~~,•-L, 003 'ti w ~.`a:...i n I I ! I / DfIFNPOV 1 20^ NOO'36'16'W FUTURE CL/N/C a / POND •C 2004 r aamac.. m & CORP. [Y77CE o o .y.. \ \ ~P p C E86?iT DOLQUDO J`I, xr FOR NURSING w WE / / =WENT - NQNE RfSTDfNIS 74 I I Im ~ V I I I \ ~ 6 ~ y ,.I z awt „w, pH38!28'51•w 24.5 70'4 'Ali. % - .~.wc -'12131_ 317.42' - I~I_ _ t2@.9s i OF / N00'15'S1"W ` ~gth A / R=15' - - 575.02't'•~°<a p=89'32'29• / ~ / - -TABQP S7REFT ~ ~ j i IAKENWL fSN1E(t 9JBDIN4CN PlD / SHEET 2 OF 6 >z a d MOUNTAIN VISTA RETIREMENT VILLAGE - FINAL PLAT >a9a J YI I Oil I! I I-I I I~ of a (11 uti2) A REPLAT OF LOTS 18, 19, 20 do 21 OF LEE'S SUBDIVISION IN THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 20 AND THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 17, w T17 TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST, OF THE 6th PRINCIPLE MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO 1AA35 qi.T N Nt~1t IAt qtr IL[ .LYw[r 1/RY n _ /w IUw2 !0 11132' r xioo' I a LOT 5 I 79.623 SF 1.633 AC 0 . - -lSi.a1'-r o~+cr Au~ss ~ FASF]++ENr (TIP.) ~ A. pp z - snvu•oq~22ayLJ ~ 1x..,w wq~ss~rncs ctia,~wT sx e I~ N l 1 e-a,m w :tz 1• rarugalr uov ,bPU'oo"E ~g - to T1 „ov45'oe•w mt~t' vAt1FT .wRn gl,wcr ND NeYaa'9a•E .-a5.m f 1 AS. 0 fl4MLlICY w624 FAYl4,T ♦S.OP fi{Ttt- 900'~506•E 2m.9r . coq.oN r r b.ss t.tsJ- LOT 2 221.129 5.076 AC C' I III LOT 21 LOT 20 I~f I ,a 2 7J . = . .4 ' ' 2 otoevlcT mass rAS7rnr t39.o5 zle.az LOT 1 R-,1 e_„6ST3 a • I Y 14.8" 5F FAYlF11T O m 0.341 AC 1,O 5'51 .6 $ mw a mcWUA . R Way ]YMILf f➢1T. S. e-u7ass• S 2, 31, g 117 1A7O, 8101 FAStmIT ` - N00l5'51'W-S75.02' a-15' R s• .e. cD TI9N~ e-69.3z•z9 _ - - -z1AY I -cL $ .-0 Om 05 w .,w WT LS, q12 196.51' 20 LOT 19 J /A~70.0a - \A.1am• \ III i / / o-s7srsr I' y\ te' R1A IOV AwOtET \ \ o1~1wG uTwm ow 16• • ' III 6.22 LOT S \ 95.311 SF \ \ m 2168 AC I I N N~ 1 7 N\ 1 1~1Y1.9J' L~ \ 1 \ RT77S/ YSTC 1211• T A cLm0,T PIOUlir 4-W _,V7 41- I LOT 19 I LOT :8 I I ~I LOT 4 237.610 SF 5.455 AC I I ~~10' A0. Fd1 .wM1g1TN qrW 12111p® OM U15TNG P,w ll-~ 2C 14 wN00.36'106W~ ~ .04 YAT 1 ,SAv 1 flu 275 K "5vz T96 }5N A~WUE i I to wwTU u1c rw9:TOrt \ 2.14 .c 71e \ Il \ ro wuts m1 u ~o 4- zs Q Q n omwN. r..e ,•..a P S~ 0. Q~ 0 0 I v ,wAT PI~pQL m IEV. • K 11x. m M-2 I pm uc uv 1r I I / i / I/e~c a eqe 44 sf L- / @EFT 3 OF 6 , BAPTIST HOME ASSOCIATION OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS, INC. 5280 Vivian Street • Arvada, Colorado 80002-1923 • (303) 424-5589 March 13, 1998 Meredith Reckert, Planner City of Wheatridge Planning and Development Dept. 7500 West 29' Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80034 Re: Request for variance for new construction at Vista Village Independent Living, 4700 Tabor Street, Wheat Ridge, CO Dear Ms. Reckert In the letter we received from you in March, 98, you noted that the set back for one of the duplexes planned for construction in Vista Village Retirement Community - Independent Living apartments at 4700 Tabor Street was inside the thirty (30) foot set back zone. Robert Taylor of R&R Engineering and Surveying reported that this was a concern. He suggested that I had the opportunity to apply to the Planning Commission for a variance allowing the proposed building to remain as shown in the site plan previously submitted. There are several reasons why I feel this request should be considered: 1) The duplex was originally laid out to match the set back for an existing structure which is being demolished in the Village. This infringement has not been a problem in the past and I reasoned that the set back could remain the same - similar to a "grandfather clause" on previous construction. The proposed building is separated from the roadway by open space and a steep hillside. 2) The infringement is on land that was formerly owned by Baptist Home Association. The adjacent parcel of land was deeded to the Colorado Department of Highways (without compensation) in 1987, when the North I-70 Service Road was upgraded and extended from Tabor to Ward Road. Since that time, staff from our facilities has provided maintenance to that public area including mowing, watering, and snow removal from the sidewalk to accommodate pedestrian traffic. 3) I am concerned that moving the new structure further North or West from where planned will necessitate removal of several long standing trees, both soft and hardwood. The immediate area needs to retain as much of this established growth as possible; as protection from hillside erosion, to dampening the noise level coming from the highway, and to continue the beautification of Vista Village. Division of American Baptist Homes of the Midwest Eden Prairie, Minnesota Paget 4) Finally, the relocation of the proposed duplex into any other area of Vista Village will greatly inhibit the amount of open space that the residents now enjoy. Leaving the unit tucked close to that hillside will create a very open, secure, and noise free environment for the residents living there. We need to do all that we possibly can to retain the central park area at The Village for the quiet enjoyment of its residents. Baptist Home Association and I thank for your time and consideration in this matter. If there is anything else we can provide to facilitate this request, please let me know. Sincerely, Floyd H. Harrison, Jr. President & CEO, BHA ZONING MAP REVISION REQUEST Date: -:;7 - 1-:5 - `7 Y By: Location: ef ~ 0 j Description of Revision(s) Case No. (itj-j~ - 9S, - Ordinance No. 6/ (If Applicable) Conditions? (Copy Attached?) Effective Date Site Plan, Plat, Map Attached? Yes No Legal Description or Survey Attached? Yes Address Assigned or Changed?_Ou Map Revised By: I Date Map Recorded with Jeffco Recorder: Reception N NOTE A COPY OF THIS FORM WILL BE PLACED IN THE CASE FILE UPON COMPLETION OF REVISIONS & RECORDING! wnemapr: 9-12-96 No Date: ~lzo%~ The City of 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80215-6713 (303) 234-5900 City Admin. Fax # 234-5924 June 3, 1998 Dear Property Owner: Police Dept. Fax # 235-2949 Wheat GRldge This is to inform you that Case No. WZ-98-6 which is a request for approval of an amendment to the Mountain Vista Planned Commercial Development final development plan to allow for the construction of six additional independent living units (3 duplex units) and covered parking on the southern portion of the property located at 4700 Tabor Street will be heard by the Wheat Ridge City Council in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue. The meeting will be held on June 22, 1998, at 7:00 p.m. All owners and/or their legal counsel of the parcel under consideration must be present at this hearing. As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to notify any other persons whose presence is desired at this hearing. If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2846. Thank you. Planning Division. C:\Barbara\CCRPTS\PUBNOTIC\WZ986. WPD t0 RECYCLED PAPER a d c d ~ m a v c d 'U N N d y y a a Q Q' O 7 C u 'v v 1! B m ' vi c v ~ y a c Fil l y N N I-O N L N O ,r mO N C N ' N N 'O L E O R V E ° m # a c d o N-- v W m W <o W co W W x C a Q U N N 3 3 c~ m 3 3 yi m ` v a U r , O O Z R E ~n ~v a M a° cym°w E¢ w ~K°m Imo ' O a O NO ;5 2 O 7 N y 0 (J LL d m V E d` o T 0 N ? m 8 O 2(6 V > 9 9 Qom LL"O w 0 ~ Y y T=F ~ > ~ = .0~ ,M ~ N to ll. L10 J r ~ ~ V b md' L ~~t ~s ~(DQ 'a N d 3 3 3 a- a N ~ N N N O N~ KSU U~u° w z . z m LU ~ a v v a v N O o M M ro m ~ 00 d ~ m o m ~ W W O m rn rn m F- > V z w¢w N Oda o } O W NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge CITY COUNCIL on June 22,1998, at 7:00 p.m. at 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. The following petitions shall be heard: 1. Case No. WZ-98-06: An application from Baptist Home Association of the Rocky Mountains, Inc. for approval of an amendment to the Mountain Vista Retirement Village Planned Community Development (PCD) final development plan with variances for the construction of six independent living units and carports located at 4700 Tabor Street. Said property is legally described as follows: Lot 4, Mountain Vista Retirement Village located in Section 17 and 20, Township 3 South, Range 69 West, 6' Principal Meridian, City of Wheat Ridge, State of Colorado. 2. Case No. MS-98-1: An application submitted by the Public Service Company for approval of a re-subdivision plat to allow for a lot line adjustment for the relocation of a Public Service Company natural gas regulator facility. Said property is zoned Commercial-One and located at 7605 W. 44" Avenue and 4401 Wadsworth Boulevard and legally described as follows: A tract of land being a portion of the Northwest quarter of Section 23, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian in the City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, being more particularly described as follows: Basis of bearings: The South line of the Northwest quarter of Section 23, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, Jefferson County, Colorado, monumented at the West end by a recovered and accepted 3" alloy cap in range box stamped "City of Wheat Ridge LS 13212," and at the East end by a recovered and accepted 3" alloy cap in range box stamped "City of Wheat Ridge LS 13212," being assumed to bear S89°41' 37"W, a distance of 2,637.32 feet. Commencing at the point of intersection of the Westerly right-of-way line of Wadsworth Boulevard with the Northerly right-of-way line of West 44'h Avenue, said point being the point of beginning; thence S89 °41'37"W, on the Northerly line of West 44th Avenue, a distance of 517.00 feet; thence N00° 10' 12"W, on the Westerly line of the Easterly 556.00 feet of the Northwest quarter of said Section 23, a distance of 222.00 feet; thence N89°41'37"E, on the Northerly line of the Southerly 252.00 feet of the Northwest quarter of said Section 23, a distance of 226.00 feet to West line of the South 280.64 feet of the East 10 acres of said Northwest quarter of Section 23; thence N00°37'37"E on the West line of said East 10 acres, a distance of 28.64 feet to the North line of the south 280.64 feet of said Northwest quarter; thence N89°41'37"E on side North line, a distance of 290.61 feet to the Westerly line of said Wadsworth Boulevard; thence S00° 10' 12"E on said Westerly line a distance of 250.64 feet to the point of beginning. Containing a calculated area of 2.826 acres. Barbara Delgadillo, Plarfi~ng Secretary ATTEST: Wanda Sang, City Cl k To be Published: June 5, 1998 Wheat Ridge Transcript C1Bubu C"TSNUBNOTIC 22nicciing%Vd -500 WEST 29TH AVENUE The City of P.O. BOX 638 WHE-"T RIDGE. CO 80034-O-----2 x,303) 234-5900 ~1Vheat "City Admin. Fax # 234 5924 Police Deot. Fax:! 235 2949 Ridge POSTING CERTIFICATION 6 CASE NO. 141jc- ?A- PLANNING COMMISSION - CIT CY OUNCIL - BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (Circle One) HEARING DATE: /rJ 22~ / 9 9 I, SZ n a m e residing at a d d r e s s as the applicant for Case No. !N.,VF- 9'j7- 6 , hereby certify that I have posted the Notice of Public Hearing at y 7 U rJ Tear fr. ~t~Fi9T -;7Gt (1 oc a t i o n) on this -57'y day of ..zlyzic 19 91e, and do hereby certify that said sign has been posted and remained in place for fifteen (15) days prior to and including the scheduled day of public hearing of this case. The sign was posted in the position shown on the map below. /I- "I I Signat e: NOTE: This form must be submitted at e public hearing on this case and will be placed in the applicant's case file at the Department of Planning and Development. : NO IS ' : n0`' Ya 1 •}.i i: g wc»a.ns enaoea • 41Z-]5-04 - - ti: ,}...:•..::R•:}:}cY: rev. . 88 _ 1 - 1 II 1 7500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Wheat Telephone 303/ 237-6944 FAX 303/234-5924 May 12, 1998 Mr. Floyd Harrison, President Baptist Home Association of the Rockies 5280 Vivian Street Arvada, CO 80002 Dear Mr. Harrison: Ridge Please be advised that at its meeting of May 7, 1998, the Planning Commission recommended approval of your request for an amendment to your PCD, subject to conditions, for the property located at 6185 West 38' Avenue. In addition, the Planning Commission did not recommend approval of your parking. The project planner will be in contact with you for additional information or once your request is scheduled before the City Council for their action. Please feel free to contact me at 235-2846 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Barbara Delgadillo Planning and Development Secretary Attachments: Copy of Draft Planning Commission Minutes /bd cc: WZ-98-06' C. Barb.aTCRPTS\PLANGCONRCORRESP\wz98O6.wpd S. APPROVAL OF MINUTES q The minutes of the April 16, 1998, Wheat Ridge Planning Commission were presented for approval. Commissioner SNOW requested the following amendments: Page 12, item 1 should be amended to read: "Concern was expressed as to whether the type of advertisement on bus shelters could be strictly enforced in regard to objectionable content in light of the First Amendment; and that staff be directed to consult with the city attorney as to an opinion on this issue." Page 12, item 3 should be amended to read: "That the shelters be placed in all zone districts; and that in residential districts they be restricted to properties where uses include churches, schools, libraries, other public facilities and vacant land." It was moved by Commissioner GOKEY and seconded by Commissioner SNOW to approve the minutes as amended. The motion carried by a vote of 6-0, with Commissioner DUNN absent. 6. PUBLIC FORUM There was no one signed up to speak before the Commission. PUBLIC HEARING Chair THOMPSON declared the public hearing open. A. Case No. WZ-98-6/Mountain Vista: An application by Baptist Home Association of the Rocky Mountains, Inc. for approval of an amendment to the Mountain Vista Retirement Village Planned Commercial Development (PCD) final development plan, with variances, for the construction of three duplex units (six independent living units) located at 4700 Tabor Street, Wheat Ridge, CO. Meredith Reckert presented the case as described above, and entered the zoning ordinance, case file and packet materials into the record. She advised that the property was within the City of Wheat Ridge, that all notification and posting requirements had been met, and there was jurisdiction to hear the case. Ms. Reckert reviewed the staff report and noted the report had been modified to reflect that the correct number of existing units within the development was 41 rather than 31 which was incorrectly stated in the final development plan submitted to staff. She informed that the final development plan proposed construction of three duplex buildings plus coverage of all open parking with carport structures. Two of the duplex buildings would be located at the very southwest corner of the property with carport structures and would displace existing Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 May 7, 1998 maintenance buildings. Setback variances would be required for the carports and the eastern structure (which had been shifted northwest to reduce the amount of variance needed.) The third duplex building would be located in the northwest portion of the site and would displace nine existing parking spaces, drive area and landscaping. The displaced parking would be relocated in front of the southern building. There would also be a need for a variance to allow 62 parking spaces rather than the 64 required by code. Ms. Reckert informed that staff made recommendations for overflow parking to be provided throughout the project and for a pedestrian link to be installed between the north and south parts of the development. Ms. Reckert reviewed the variance criteria advising that required setback criteria from property line is 30 feet and the applicant was showing the most southern building as being 14.5 feet from southern property line. Carports in same area have setbacks of about six feet; therefore the setback variances request were for 15.5 feet and 24 feet. She reviewed the criteria used to evaluate a variance request and informed that staff recommended approval due to unique circumstances of slopes on the property and the excessive right-of-way along the frontage road. Ms. Reckert informed that staff recommended denial of the variance request which would allow 62 parking spaces instead of the 64 spaces required by code because there were other alternatives for parking available to the applicant. Questions and discussion followed. Commissioner SNOW stated that it was her recollection that the applicant had donated land to the Highway Department and referred to the ordinance which says that a land use does not become nonconforming if government action caused the problem. She asked if the Highway Department could grant the land back to the applicant. Ms. Reckert replied that the Highway Department rarely vacates any right-of-way. Commissioner SNOW requested an amendment to the map that would replace the words "Planned Community Development" with "Planned Commercial Development." Commissioner SNOW asked if they are losing parking spaces because covered areas are larger or because of the construction. Ms. Reckert replied that it was due to construction which would displace parking around one of the buildings. Commissioner GOKEY asked how many residents had automobiles. Ms. Reckert replied that although many residents do not own vehicles, the City must still follow the standards. Commissioner GOKEY asked if the drainage study was based upon the additional parking spots. Ms. Reckert explained that the applicant had an original drainage report for the overall site including the south side and did an addendum to original report for the new structures. -:Y Planning Commission Minutes - Page 3 May 7, 1998 Chair THOMPSON expressed concern about visitors parking along the south curve causing restricted traffic flow. Ms. Reckert stated that her concern would be in regard to fire access. Commissioner SHOCKLEY asked if the city had considered any guard railing where Tabor from 44th comes up from the service road and directly across the street. Ms. Reckert explained that the State has jurisdiction in this matter but the City could make a recommendation for guard railings. Following further discussion, the applicant addressed the Commission. Ronald Heselton 7682 Saulsbury Street, Arvada, CO Mr. Heselton was swom by Chair THOMPSON. He stated that he was Director of Special Projects with the Baptist Home Association and that he was representing Floyd Harrison. He informed that the Association would support any recommendations made by the Planning Commission. He stated that they were willing to go along with two additional parking spaces, but expressed surprise about the recommendation for a pedestrian walkway to connect the north and south areas because of the steep incline in that area. He informed that there was a bus to transport residents from the community center to the nursing home and that some residents also have their own cars. He stated that the parking spaces are usually half full and the only time there was a need for additional parking was during special events such as the monthly potluck and, at those times, people park along the south area opposite the parking spaces and still keep a clear lane of traffic flow. He requested that the Commission grant the variances in order for the Association to proceed with their project and noted that they wish to increase capacity because there is a two-year waiting list on the present buildings. Commissioner GOKEY referred to the pedestrian walkway and asked what the percentage of incline was where the walkway was proposed. Mr. Heselton replied that he estimated it to be 40%. Commissioner SNOW informed that ADA requires no more than 8.33%. In response to questions from Commissioner GOKEY, Mr. Heselton explained that they have not experienced any problems with drainage; that the units were built on concrete slabs; and that an estimated 10% of the residents used wheelchairs. Commissioner SNOW expressed concern that more handicapped parking spaces should be provided. Mr. Heselton explained that there are vans from such places as Denver Mobility which transport residents and that the Association also has a large van for this purpose. He also noted that none of the residents own handicapped vans. COLLINS asked why, with a two-year waiting list, they were not considering more than six units. Mr. Heselton replied that this was due to the land use issue and also that they were trying to create a continuum of care with an assisted living program connected to the nursing home where the present residents could be accommodated into assisted living and then into J1 the nursing home as the needed. Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 May 7, 1998 Commissioner BRINKMAN expressed concerns about building "C" being squeezed into such a small area and suggested that the building be moved to the top northwest corner. Mr. Heselton replied that relocation would be extremely difficult because of the slope of the area. Commissioner BRINKMAN stated that she was not pleased with the location of the buildings having only 30 feet separation between buildings, and expressed concern that there was no buffering between that structure and the commercial building to the east. She suggested that buildings A and B contain another unit and eliminate the need for the third building. Mr. Heselton replied that while he appreciated her concerns, the buildings open up onto a central courtyard and that other buildings in the area face I-70 noise levels. He stated that they have tried to accommodate everything they needed into the best locations they could. Commissioner THOMPSON mentioned that patio homes in the new development off of 38th Avenue have only ten-foot separations. Ms. Reckert informed that the standard front setback requirement for new homes is thirty feet. Commissioner SNOW mentioned that single family homes have combined side yard setbacks of only 15 feet. She asked the applicant if it would be possible to make the structure smaller by having one one-bedroom unit and one two-bed room unit rather than having two two-bedroom units. Ms. Heselton replied that they like to provide two-bedroom units for the residents to provide for visitors. Commissioner GOKEY suggested making wider handicapped spaces for side loading vans. Chair THOMPSON suggested that handicapped spaces also be covered. Commissioner SNOW moved and Commissioner SHOCKLEY seconded to recommend that the City Council APPROVE that the request for approval of a setback variance next to right- of-way for property located at 4700 Tabor Street for the following reasons: 1. A variance is required to allow construction on the property as shown on the development plan., 2. The topography of the site and the excess right-of-way along the frontage road have created unique circumstances so that there actually is sufficient ground between the proposed buildings and the road. The buildings that were in this location prior to this time were also within the required setback and there have been no problems. Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 May 7, 1998 4. A hardship does exist in that it is important to save the existing mature trees which help prevent slope erosion as well as lessen the interstate highway noise and also to alleviate the impact on the open space. The motion carried by a vote of 6-0 with Commissioner DUNN absent. Commissioner SNOW moved and Commissioner GOKEY seconded to recommend to City Council that Case No. WZ-98-6, a request for approval of an amendment to a Planned community final plan for property located at 4700 Tabor Street, be APPROVED for the following reasons: The proposal is consistent with the underlying outline development plan. 2. All requirements for a PCD plan amendment have been met. With the following conditions: No parking be allowed along the northeast curve adjacent to building no. 5. That handicapped parking space be moved to a safer location as approved by the planning director. Commissioner BRINKMAN stated that she would vote against the motion because of the close proximity of Building C to the road and to the other buildings and also because residents of Building 5 would have to walk farther to get to their cars. She stated that it was her opinion there is room to expand buildings A and B or to relocate the building somewhere else. Commissioner GOKEY commented that he did not want to see any further development on this site and asked if there were additional buildings proposed for in the future. Ms. Reckert replied that there would be no density left for additional buildings unless there was a rezoning process. The motion carried by a vote of 5 to 1, Commissioner BRINKMAN voting no and Commissioner DUNN absent. It was moved by Commissioner SNOW and seconded by Commissioner GOKEY to recommend that the City Council APPROVE the request for approval of a parking variance for property located at 4700 Tabor Street for the following reasons: Because of the age of the applicants and the less than average number of cars owned, parking spaces are rarely filled except for a once-a-month event. 2. Adding parking spaces would decrease the amount of landscaping available. 3. Commission does not wish to consider this as establishment of a precedent for dissimilar properties. This property is unique in that it is one of the few providing affordable housing for seniors and because of the relative senior age of the residents. Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 May 7, 1998 Commissioner COLLINS stated that he did not feel the Commission should risk setting a precedent over two parking spaces. The motion failed by a vote of 3 to 3, with Commissioners BRR KMAN, COLLINS and SHOCKLEY voting no, and Commissioner DUNN absent. Chair THOMPSON declared a recess at 9:00 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 9:05 p.m. B. Case No. WZ-98-9: An application from Daniel J. Mahoney for approval to rezone property located at 6185 West 38th Avenue from Residential-Three to Restricted Commercial. The case was presented by Meredith Reckert. She entered the comprehensive plan, zoning ordinance, case file, packet materials and exhibits into the record. She informed that the property was within the City of Wheat Ridge; that all notification and posting requirements had been met and there was jurisdiction to hear the case. Ms. Reckert informed that the purpose of the rezoning was for conversion of the building to a commercial use. The applicant currently resides on the property and, if rezoning is approved, the structure would be converted into a commercial office or a live/work situation where the owner would reside on the top floor and maintain an office in the lower level. She noted that if the property were redeveloped with the current zoning, four multi-family units would be allowed on the property. She advised that there was adequate graveled parking and drive area for the conversion; however to meet commercial standards these areas would have to be paved. Ms. Reckert informed that a neighborhood meeting was held on March 24, 1998 where one neighbor (Angela Cheer, 6165 West 38th Avenue) attended and stated that she did not object to the rezone as long as offensive uses such as liquor sales or adult entertainment were not allowed. Ms. Reckert pointed out that RC zoning does not allow these uses. Ms. Reckert reviewed the agency referrals and rezoning criteria and stated that it was staff s conclusion that the proposed rezoning was consistent with the existing Comprehensive Plan and adjacent land use on the east and west. Staff further concluded that there was existing solid fencing and landscaping along the northern property line for buffering for adjacent residential property and therefore recommended approval with the condition that the gravel driveway and parking area be paved. Commissioner BRINKMAN asked if the entire parking lot would have to be paved. Ms. Reckert replied that only the ten parking spaces and driveway would have to be paved. Commissioner BRINKMAN asked if it would set a precedent to allow the owner to leave the gravel parking lot under the current use, but require paving if the use were to change to full commercial use. Ms. Reckert stated that it could be utilized with the present live/work situation without the paving. Planning Commission Minutes - Page 7 May 7, 1 998 PUBLIC HEARING SPEAKERS' LIST CASE NO: WZ-98-06 DATE: May 7, 1998 REQUEST: An application from Baptist Home Assn. Of the Rocky Mountains, Inc. For approval of an amendment to the Mountain Vista Retirement Village PCD final development plan with variances for 3 duplex units. Position on Request (Please check) SPEAKER NAME, ADDRESS & PHONE (PLEASE PRINT) IN FAVOR OPPOSED /~oi1/F, CC~ /7€J~L~- ~/9P7is7' /7cf1~~JSoC ;~2~0 V/!~/A.✓ ~T. /7ePl//JDiJ Cam/ LOGO 2 e:/planning\forms/phroster. frm _ ~~►'l V r0 UNTAIN VISTA ICE TIREMENT VILLA G FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AN a~~'I C'IAL D LO SI~ CHARTER 3TATEk~NT~ AMENDMENT N0. ~F,VFI,nPMF,NT PLAN TN T~TF, CITY n L01' 4, ~YIOUNTAI~'~' VISTA RF,TIRF,MENT VII,LACE LOCATED IN SECTIO;V 17 AND 20, TOWNSf~IP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST, ~vv~ Dninir~D~~ n~c~n~nr~n~ r~mv nc wr~sn~r n~nrc rmemc nc rnrna,~ni THIS PROJECT PROPOSES THE CONSTRUCTION OF THREE DUPLEXES, (SIX INDEPENDENT APARTMENTS) AND ASSOCIATED COVERED PARKING ON A 5.46 ACRE PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WEST WEST 48TH AVENUE AND TABOR STREET IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE. THESE APARTMENTS W!LL BE ARCNITECTURALI Y COORDINATED AND OF HIGH QUALITY. A ~~f THi5 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE PROPERTY ADJACENT TO AND COORDINATED WITH THE EXISTING MOUNTAIN VISTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY, GENEROUS PERIMETER LANDSCAPING, OPEN SPACE, AND BUILDING SETBACKS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED ON ALA SIDES OF THE PROPERTY !N ORDER TQ BUFFER ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND TO CREATE A QUALITY ENVIRONMENT WITHIN THE PROJECT. THE PARKING AREAS HAVE BEEN DESIGNED TO ALLOW FOR CLEAR CIRCULATION WITHIN THE PROJECT, AS IA~LL AS A SEPARATION OF PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR TRAFFIC. ~e 1 THE MATERIALS USED IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS FACILITY WILL BE CONSISTENT tN COLOR AND z: TEXTURE WITH THE EXISTING BUILDINGS ON THE PROPERTY. FOR EXAMPLE: BRICK, WOOD, STONE AND GLASS. THE STYLE OF THE BUILDINGS SHALL REFLECT THE RESIDENTIAL QUALITY OF THE COMPLEX THAT HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED THROUGH PREVIOUS EXISTING PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. THE ROOFS WILL BLEND WITH THE LINES OF THE EXISTING MOUNTAIN VISTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY. THE FINAL LAYOUT AND ORIENTATION OF THE BUILDING FOOTPRINTS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO ALLOW FOR AND ENCOURAGE THE KIND OF PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY INHERENT TO THfS TYPE OF RETIREMENT COMMUNITY. kr' LECaAL DESCRN'TION~ ~ ~ ~ ~ T~ ~y LOT 4, MOUNTAIN VISTA RETIREMENT VILLAGE. ~ m ~ Jl/IIG LLY Englewood, Colorado 801)2 CITY OF WHEAT RfDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO 303J92,284b Q Q ~ ~ CHAIRMAN SITE z PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR SITE aATA~~ PERMITTED USES: ALL USES ALLOWED UNDER RECORDED FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. LOT 4 - INdEPENDENT APARTMENTS. CITY COiJNG~„ CERTIFICATI~ ~XISITING PLAN AMENDED PLAN APPROVED THIS DAY OF 19___, BY THE THE WHEAT RIDGE PROPERTY AREA: 5.46 ACRES 5.46 ACRES CITY COUNCIL. Architects Engineers Planners ~ - KDA, P.C. BUDDING AREA: 83,800 SQ.FT. - 35~ 89,176 SQ.FT, - 37~ VICINITY MAP 1201 1$th St. Suite 200 DENVER, CO. $g202 N.T.s. Q (PH) 303-296-$556 (FAX) 303-296-8555 ~ PARKING/DRIVE: 62,000 SQ.FT. - 26% 67,270 SQ.FT. - 28% LANDSCAPE AREA: 92,000 SQ.FT. - 39% 81,340 SQ.FT. - 34~ TOTAL # OF UNITS: 41 47 VISTA VILLAGE TOTAL # PARKING SPACES: 42 60 OWNER INDEPENDENT LIVING THE BELOW-SIGNED OWNER(S), OR LEGALLY DESIGNATED AGENT(S) THEREOF, DO HEREBY AGREE THAT THE PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED HEREON WILL BE DEVELOPED AS A PLANNED WHEAT RIDGE, CD DEVELOPMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE USES, RESTRlCTlONS AND CONDITIONS COrlTAINED IN TNIS PLAN, AND AS MAY OTHERWISE BE REQUIRED BY LAW. WE FURTHER RECOGNIZE THAT THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN GOES NOT CREATE A VESTED PROPERTY RIGHT. VESTED PROPERTY RIGHTS MAY ONLY ARISE AND ACCRUE PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 26-6(G} dF ARTICLE t OF THE CODE OF LAWS OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE. UNIFIED CONTROL STATNT~ THE PROPERTY IS OWNED BY BAPTIST HOME ASSOCIATION OF THE ROCKY MQUNTAINS, INC., A THE PROJECT OWNER, BAPTIST HOME ASSOCfAT10N OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS, SHALL PROVIDED UNIFIED COLORADO CORPORATION. CONTROL BY MAINTAINING A SINGLE MANAGEMENT THROUGH-OUT THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. I~TES~ 1. THE OWNERS OF THE IRRIGATION DITCHES WHICH CROSS THIS SITE ARE: FLOYD N. HARRISON JR. JERRY L DICKEY WADSWORTH DITCH CO►~PANY C/0 NICK KEL~ER PRESIDENT/CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER EXECUTIVE SECRETARY 431-8335 6706 RALSTON ROAD ARVADA, COLORADO 80002 STATE OF COLORADO SS COUNTY OF JEFFERSON 2. THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN !S AN AMENDMENT TO THE PREVIOUS DEVELOPMENT PLAN RECORDED UNDER RECEPTION NUMBER 97077010. REV. 4-20-98 CITY COMMENTS 3. THIS PROJECT IS NOT IMPACTED BY A FLOOD PLAIN. THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF 199__. A.D., BY FLOYD H. HARRISON JR. AS PRESIDENT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND 3Y JERRY L DICKEY 4. OUTSfDE AREA LIGHTS TO BE METAL HALIDE LAMPS AS PER CITY CODE. AS EXECUTIVE SECRETARY OF BAPTIST HOME ASSOCIATION QF THE ROCKY MOUNTAIiS, INC. 5. ALL PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION TO COMMENCE IN SPRING, 1998. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES ADDRESS FDP 6. MOUNTAIN VISTA RETMREMENT V1L~AGE IS ZONED PCD -PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. 7 RFARIN(;~ ARF RASF~ ~N THE FAST i INF (lF THE ~t~l1THFAST OF SECTION 17. BEARING N00'16'00"W. THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 17 IS A FOUND BRASS CAP (LS 1312 SET IN A RANGE BOX, THE EAST CORNER OF SECTION 17 IS A FOUND BRASS CAP NOTARY PUBLIC (LS 13212) SET IN A RANGE BOX. "J Drawn/Checked Project Number NOTE HOLDERS: (MORTGAGEES) .l RBT 8. THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT AFFECTS ONLY LOT 4 OF MOUNTAIN VISTA RETIREMENT VILLAGE Approved 9 7 SUBDIVISION ALL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN LOTS 11 4 31 AND 5 OF MOUNTAIN VISTA RETIREMENT VILLAGE 1. 1ST BANK OF WHEAT RIDGE, A COLORADO CORPORATION 03a SUBDIVISION SHALL BE CONSISITANT WITH THE PREVIOUS DEVELOPMENT PLAN RECORDED Ai RECEPTION 2. AMERICAN BAPTIST EXTENSION CORPORATION, VALLEY FORGE, PENNSYVANIA. NO. 92077010. ` 9. THERE ARE NO PROPOSED SIGNS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS DEVELOPMENT. Issued for Bids Drawing Number scale: 10. THE TRASH FACILITIES FOR THE PROPOSED UNITS WILL BE TREATED SHE SAME WAY AS THE EXISITING 1' =3Q' OF 4 UNITS. THIS CONSISTS OF A CONCRETE SLAB WITH 5'-10" WALLS AROUND THE PERIMETER FOR SCREENING. CASE HSTORYWZ-72-08, WZ-85-4, WZ-87-4, WZ-90-11, WZ-98-6 date 1-30-98 n , t i _ ~ l f ~ ~ a- ~ • ~ ~~~N nFF'I CIAL D \ _ L0 ~ , ~ a.~ ~ ~ , _ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~3 ~ . P. / _ _ _ ~b -z _ 542 4 _ _ _ ~ ~ , y ~ f 4 ` E i i ~ ~ ~ \ / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r 5 s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ \ t~ ~ / , ~ \ ~ ~ ~ \ \ ~ / ~1~ Ir~~vrne rive East f / / /  ~ /VG / 3~.s' I CO ~r~~~wac~r ~c~i~rc~c~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ #s ~ ~ 1 INDUSTRIAL PARK v .l ~ ~ ~,~F a ~ 4 ~4 ~ ~ / / ~ \ ~ ~ F-- i ~'--'f I \ O• ~ 1, \ ~ a) i r ~ \,i ` ~ 1 ~ t I c ~ ~ r~ ~ s~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~oanaw ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` \ ~ \ ~PARKNIG~) . ~ ( EXISTING ~ ~ ~ I ti ~ o ~F 1 1, 1I ~ o , ~ ~ BUILDING ~ i rite r~r~+~~~~ f~l~~r ~ 'i ~ ~ ! ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ FLAG NOTES ~ I I I ~ ' `1 1 ` ~ Iti / ~ I I 1Q ASPHALT PAV{NG-TYPICAL ~ • i ~ { 1, ~ ~ `'11 1LJ ~ i • ~ ~ f4/ ~ ~ m p ~ 6 CURB & GUTTER PER ~ ~ ~ J~ ~ ~ .k~s N ~ ~ (I ~ ~ ~ ~ CITY STANDARDS 1 4; . t 1 ~ I r 1 ~ {I 1 ~ Sj ~ ~ ~ 1 i... ~ ~ 1~ ~ ~ ~ 1 _r,~ ~s \ 1~ 1 ~ \ , 0 ~ ~ \ r~.. ~ ~ S 89°16`25" W ~ ~ 1 ~ 0. 6' ~\,t ~ r ~ ~ j~ \ ~ j ~ ~ `tl ti~ w i ~ ~ ~ N 00 36 16 W , ~ 20.04, ~ i ~x~~',t~c its L-98.83 ~ ~ ~ OLD A ~ CMG ~ ~ _ R=307.43 7 ~ l ~s, ~ ~ ~ \ \ r 6=18'26' 38" B=N X6`53'20" W ~ ~ ~ 1 t„ f i C=98.41' , ~ ~ ~4~~~~ q~ i, LEGEND I ff~~~\ it L~ + SET P & C P.LS. #28291 O FOUNb T /2" REBAR / ~ ~ FND RANGE BOX P.LS. X13212 Qf SANITARY StWtK MANHULk oo~ ~ FN{3 ALUM. CAP ILLEGIBLE Q STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE Drown/Chocked Project Number is FIRE HYDRANT o PARKING LIGHT FIXTURE t~ POWER POLE 6° VERT. CURB & GUTTER W/ / ~ ark RBT GUY ANCHOR 2 PAN Approved I\► ~ 7 ~ ~ 3 . V td '~•sr STORM SEWER LINE WATER VANE ,ss SANITARY SEWER LINE ~Q'` a ~ ~ GAS METER - w WATER LINE o PEDESTAL o INLET ~ Issued for Bids Drawing Number a ` • CLEAN OUT -Q- SIGN ~ TREE WATER METER 4`~' BUSHES 2 OF 4 1 YI - \J ~'y f date 1-30-,q 8 • . rt 1~ ~ ~ n~ r it a - I f1 - - r ~ ~ - ~ ~ ' PL~NT LIST i ~ ~ KEl' GtTY. COMrtoN NArtE 8 r ZE 1 ~ ~ ~ \ ~ pEGiDUOUS SNaDE TREES ~ ~ ~ MA 3 MARSHALL X451-~1 2 -2 ~~s - ~ IHL 3 IMPERIAL 1-~ONEl'LOGU3t 2-2~i2" t ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ DECIDUOUS SHRUBS 1. - N5F 6 NORTHERN SUN FORSI'T1-tIA 5 CsAL, DKL b DWARF IGOREAN LILAC 5 GsAL. F~/, ~ ~ 1. / ~ ~ _ ~1/E1~CsI~EEN 5~i?tJBS ~ - , 5J 4'1 SCANDIA JUNIPER 5 GiAL. / - j r _ / \ _ - _ _ _ NOTES: _ ~ 1t ~i ~ 1. aLL Di8?l,t~ED LAtU~I Ai~EAS to BE RE-ESraBLt5NED t1PON COM~'LETION OF GONSTRUGTION. ~ 20 ' 2. ALL NEW LAU1N Af~AS t0 BE 80D~E~. / N ~8~' _ 3. AL.L ~W LaWN aREaB To BE iRRt~ArED. 1~ ~ 1 ~ ~ / ~ \ ~ EX,ST~N~ LEGEND POND i 1 /1 i ~ ~ / y ~I -t t s ~a ' ~ J. ~ i J 1 I ~ 'rte ' ~ I J 1 I j I l f`,i~ Q r c~ I ~ \ ~ ~ ~ 1 f ~ rJ fir" ~T t'~" ~A ~ - - ~ ~ ` I Ii t~1J N d a r` t c- r _ j ~r~. i ` `J~ ~ / j , ~ ! ~ ~ ~ I , z t f ~ ~ ~ ~ sI ~ ~ t ~ ~ ♦ SOT 4 i i_ ti, ~ `tip' i~~ ~ r ~ ~ i i ~ ~ ~ ~ i i~ ~ ~ - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~i ~i i ~ ~ w~~ ~ ~ 1 f _t s ' ~ ~ ~ ~ 1~ 1 I i ~ i ♦ i I _L .y e e ~ ` ~ ~ ~ i i A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ 7 s. . . ~ ~ ~ o i ~r ~ ~ ~ ~ . r ~ S 89°16'5" W ~ ~ i ~ f f 0,06 \ ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ MA EXISTING DRIV \ ~ ~ , ~ 2 NSF 8 SJ _ if 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ r` l ~ ~ \ ~ f 20,04 \ ~ f ~ ~ ~ L=98.83' ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ n s~ v R=307.03 ~ ~ ~ --~'c D=16'38" ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ E g~N 43'20" W ~ ~ ~ ~ C=98.41' ~ ~ \ ~ s Y. 1 ~ ~ F i i ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ , ~ r  / a,., d IWCsF41` ! 1,., f I f 1 I C R I +~1tg A f"1 1 Drawn/Checked Project Number f ✓ H Approved K97003sOO 10 xll a 301 60' 901, _ _ __..,r _ _ _ _ - _ ~W ~ _ __.w.~,. x _ ~ a,..,~:..~~a~.M.~ , . ~ ~ s r ~ c A ~ r i ~ ' ~ Q ~ ~ ~ q 1 i - F ~ r . , b a . e ~ , b ~ 4 . 4~ ~ - t ~ r.. ~ . ~ r W a. i+ z . , ~ _ _ ~ . . P 7 1 9 ~ ~ - ~ , a -  `I r r~ . - ~tt t~ tx ~ j;, d.. . ~ 3 ~ ~ a d~ ,,ff1 ~ ~'+P ~ - i ~ ~ ~3 w ~ ~ ~ e ~ ~ 4 _ : ~ ~ , w A ® i; ~ # k Y_ _ ~ aayt4wuya~^u,m s+,w.,lrt,. _.aHJnn+a.a~~a ~ ~ { 2' a , ~ ~ r ~ o q~ { - .YW.u {{4~+.v.tla: .;'r~:~NaYfY ~°"~^M+ 4441'V~ A4~1Mb ~ P4 •cr, {`k$kp4 mw~wviN, ~md*YAtn! nRBN~MY mBRT a~-r ;M w2 S t ~ § .~nrcw.. f~nuR,.m - P~'+'° Mbi.''°NN' ~ NHM ~ i~uab' nn~^n" ° ~Kti 1M~ ~ +M~'P b t++?*s~Wf ae...•a~. ~"+'+aM Wab,a s44~v/ r~.. 9 f _ 1. J .ti. _ _ _ i i i • . , r s. ~v~er+.ar~mis~~mm~.:eva,~.m+®eu~.w.n~m+~agvc i. ~ y ~ ~ ' e . 8 ~ r f w.. ~ . ~ ~ ~ _ 3 aY ~ * $ t ~ ' d ~ ~ P t a y 1 e ~ P ' w , r ~ a s N B i i 6 3 4 a ~ i ~ y ~ ~am_ . , S . , j a e e r i -a f~ . y . ~i• k { y Yc` ~ ' ~ { a M f a p 4 - r y ~ y i , t w t, . t --j -wow ,r~~ ~.v.,. ~ - t Number P ject roj ~ x i - f Apt s. ~ ~ _ t K97%jO3oOO ~ 4 ~ > 4 ' -F ~ ~ Drowinq Number E M~-` r w Y 2 . y. F4 < ~ ' ~ y:. . f d f d ~g t H: J ' _ M t ~y + ~ i :f rt .4 r a n a. y u. ~ T ?`flSi ~ ~ e 1 k ii d ~.G ._.~a~__,a_.~.~,,,..~;~.,..,e.....s, - - ,._.~;.resa.......~....~.::.,.,_ a...,u,.~. -s. 1 . y.,,. ~ _ .~..~:."aeu,.... _ _ U_ a. t , ti~:, ~ -'gym ~ild~ti.~.~.s;°r R.e.~~'~: Xf.~ CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission DATE OF MEETING: May 7, 1998 DATE PREPARED: April 29, 1998 CASE NO. & NAME: WZ-98-6/Mountain Vista CASE MANAGERkIM. Reckert ACTION REQUESTED: PCD Final Plan Amendment with Variance LOCATION OF REQUEST: 4700 Tabor Street NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT(S): Mountain Vista Retirement Village 4800 Tabor Street NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER(S) APPROXIMATE AREA: PRESENT ZONING: PRESENT LAND USE: SURROUNDING ZONING: SURROUNDING LAND USE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE AREA: DATE PUBLISHED: DATE POSTED: DATED LEGAL NOTICES SENT: ENTER INTO RECORD: Baptist Home Assoc. Of the Rockies 5280 Vivian Street Arvada, CO 80002 5.46 Acres Planned Commercial Development Nursing Home, Independent Living N: I, S: A-1, E: PID, W: PID N, E,: Commercial, W: Commercial, Vacant, S: 1-70 Industrial March 13, 1998 March 19, 1998 March 9, 1998 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) ZONING ORDINANCE Q SLIDES Q SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS (X) EXHIBITS O OTHER JURISDICTION: The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge and all notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. r- I. REQUEST The applicant requests approval of an amendment to the Mountain Vista Retirement Village Planned Commercial Development Plan final development plan with a setback variance. The purpose of the request is for the addition of six independent living units and carports for property located at 4700 Tabor Street (Vista Village Retirement Community). II. CASE HISTORY This staff report has been modified to reflect a correction to the number of existing units within the development. This was due to an error on the existing final development submitted to staff showing the number of units at 31 rather than 41. The property in question was rezoned from PRD, A-2 and Industrial to Planned Commercial Development with an outline development plan and final development plan and plat approvals pursuant to Case Nos. WZ-87-4 and WZ-90-11. At the time of rezoning, the nursing home was in existence on the north side of the property with 41 independent living units in place on the south side. An addition to west side of the nursing home structure was completed in 1993. The outline plan allowed for a total of 47 independent living units where only 41 were existing. The applicant is requesting approval of this request to add six additional units plus coverage of the existing parking spaces with carports and new parking. III. AGENCY REFERRALS Valley Water District is working with the applicant to resolve service issues. Additional main line extensions with looping may be required with appropriate easements. Additional water service lines and tap fees will be required for the new units. Public Works has reviewed and approved an amended drainage report. No public improvements will be required. The traffic division has no comments. Police Department has commented relative to crime prevention. Their comments have been forwarded to the applicant. Arvada Fire Protection District will require an additional fire hydrant in the vicinity of the new units in the southwest corner of the property. Water line looping will be required. IV. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN The applicant is proposing a final development plan which allows for the construction of six independent living units in three duplex buildings plus coverage of all open parking with carport WZ-98-6 Page 2 d - structures. Two of the duplex buildings would be located at the very southwest corner of the property with carport structures. These buildings will displace existing maintenance buildings. Setback variances are required for the carports and the eastern structure. The eastern building has been shifted northeast to reduce the amount of variance needed. The other duplex building is proposed for the northeast portion of the site where there are two existing structures with nine units. The new building will displacing existing parking (nine spaces), drive area and landscaping. The displaced parking will be relocated in front of the southern building in the cluster with two additional spaces in front of the new units plus one handicapped space for a total of 12 within this cluster of buildings. Staff is somewhat concerned for crowding between the western building and the new units as they will be roughly 30' apart. Staff has calculated the number of parking spaces based on the following: 27 existing bedroom units x 1.25 spaces = 34 spaces 14 existing 2 bedroom units x 1.5 spaces = 21 spaces 6 new 2 bedroom units x 1.5 spaces = 9 spaces TOTAL REQUIRED: 64 spaces The development plans provides 62 spaces (by my count), although the front sheet indicates only 60 are provided where 64 are required. No provision for guest parking has been made. The applicant believes this is not necessary based on resident make-up and history of use. After reviewing the parking regulations, staff concludes the provision for guest parking was included for true multi-family developments. Therefore, staff cannot require overflow parking, but will make a recommendation for overflow parking dispersed throughout the site. In regard to the reduction in the amount of required parking, a variance is needed. Staff also recommends that a pedestrian link be installed between the north and south parts of the overall development. The proposed construction will match existing architectural style and material currently used. If the proposed amendment is approved, building coverage will be 37%, hard surfaced coverage will be 28% and landscaped coverage will be 34%. These figures are consistent with the underlying outline development plan. V. VARIANCE CRITERIA SETBACK The required side yard setback next to a street is 30'. The required front yard setback for any structure is required to be a minimum of 50'. However, if the structure is less than 35' in height and the front yard is completely landscaped, this setback can be reduced down to 30'. The property is addressed to Tabor Street and has an access from Tabor, although the main entrance for the development is from the I-70 service road. In any event, the setback along the frontage road is required to be 30' where only 14.5' setback is provided from one of the new structures and a 6' setback from the carports at the southwest corner of the property. As such, a specific WZ-98-6 - Page 3 A'3 variances of 15' and 24' are required. The applicant has submitted a written justification to support the request for variance included under Exhibit `B'. Staff would note that there is an existing structure with a non-conforming setback in this area which will be removed if the development plan amendment is approved. Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a variance request: 1. Can the property in question yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located? If the variance is not granted, the property can still be used for independent living. Alternate locations for the new units is limited because of severe slopes along the southwest, west and northwest property lines. There is an existing structure in this location with a non-conforming setback. 2. Is the plight of the owner due to unique circumstances? Circumstances are somewhat unique because of the severe slopes on the property. 3. If the variation were granted, would it alter the essential character of the locality? In 1987, the I-70 frontage was realigned and reconstructed adjacent to Vista Village on the south and west sides. No additional right-of-way was obtained from Vista Village although there was a permanent slope easement dedicated to the City. This slope easement is located opposite of the intersection of Tabor Street with the frontage road. It is located to the west of the buildings where variances are needed. There is excess right-of-way between the southern property line of Vista Village and the physical improvements for the I-70 frontage road. This right-of-way varies in width from 5' at the very southwest corner of the property to 40' at the southwest corner of the western most carport structure. There is 60' of excess right-of-way adjacent to the duplex structure needing the variance. Because of the excess right-of-way, staff concludes that there would not be a negative affect on the character of the area because visually, the new structures appear to be setback an appropriate amount from the roadway. The area used as excess right-of-way will never be developed and should not be needed for future frontage road improvements. 4. Would the particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved result in a particular hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out? WZ-98-6 Page 4 ~_q There is somewhat of a hardship because of slopes on the property and the excessive right-of-way on the south. There are alternatives available such as not providing covered parking. The applicant has shifted the easterly building to the northwest as far as possible. 5. Would the conditions upon which the petition for a variation is based be applicable, generally, to the other property within the same zoning classification? A precedent could be established for similar requests if no findings of hardship or unique circumstances are made. 6. Is the purpose of the variation based exclusively upon a desire to make money out of the property The purpose of the variance is to build additional units and to provide covered parking. Has the alleged difficulty or hardship been created by any person presently having an interest in the property? The hardship has been self-imposed. Alternatives available include not having covered parking in this area. The applicant has already shifted the eastern building as far to the northwest as possible. 8. Would the granting of the variations be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located? Granting of the variance would be not be detrimental to the public welfare as there is adequate fire access and a substantial separation from the frontage road improvements. 9. Would the proposed variation impair the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion in the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. There should be no impact on the amount of light and air because there are no adjacent structures which would be affected. The variance would not increase congestion in the public street . Adequate provisions for fire safety are made with the installation of a new hydrant in this vicinity. It is impossible for staff to ascertain whether there will be a negative affect on property values in the neighborhood. 10. If it is found in criteria 8 and 9 above that granting of the variation would not be detrimental or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood, and it is also found that public health and safety, public facilities and surrounding Page 5 property values would not be diminished or impaired, then would the granting of the variance result in a benefit or contribution to the neighborhood or the community as distinguished from an individual benefit on the part of the applicant, or would granting of the variance result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities? The benefit of the new units is additional affordable housing for elderly persons in the area regardless of whether or not the variance is granted. To Staff's knowledge, approval of the variance would not result in an accommodation to persons with a disability PARKING Pursuant to Section IV. Of this report, 64 parking spaces are required where only 62 are provided. Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a variance request: 1. Can the property in question yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located? The property could still be utilized for independent senior living whether the parking variance for two spaces is approved. The applicant has indicated that the existing parking is underutilized because many of the residents do not have cars. 2. Is the plight of the owner due to unique circumstances? The physical characteristics of the property provide somewhat of a unique circumstance because of slopes. However, there appears to be adequate room to enlarge the existing parking areas to accommodate two additional spaces 3. If the variation were granted, would it alter the essential character of the locality? If the variance were granted, it would not alter the character of the area. 4. Would the particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved result in a particular hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out? The slopes on the property could be considered hardship, however, there is ample room for the existing parking areas to be expanded. 5. Would the conditions upon which the petition for a variation is based be applicable, generally, to the other property within the same zoning classification? WZ-98-6 Page 6 If no hardship or unique circumstances are found, a precedent could be established for similar requests. 6. Is the purpose of the variation based exclusively upon a desire to make money out of the property The variance is not economically motivated. 7. Has the alleged difficulty or hardship been created by any person presently having an interest in the property? Staff has concluded that there is no hardship affecting the need for a parking variance. 8. Would the granting of the variations be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located? Granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or properties in the area. The lack of parking could be an inconvenience for residents within the development. 9. Would the proposed variation impair the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion in the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Granting of the variance would not affect light and air in the area or endanger the public safety or neighborhood property values. If inadequate parking is provided with formalized parking spaces, residents could be forced to parking along the interior drives. 10. If it is found in criteria 8 and 9 above that granting of the variation would not be detrimental or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood, and it is also found that public health and safety, public facilities and surrounding property values would not be diminished or impaired, then would the granting of the variance result in a benefit or contribution to the neighborhood or the community as distinguished from an individual benefit on the part of the applicant, or would granting of the variance result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities? Granting of the variance would not prove to be a benefit to the neighborhood or a reasonable accommodation to a person with disabilities. WZ-98-6 Page 7 14-7 VI. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION Staff concludes that variances are required to allow construction on the property as shown on the final development plan. Staff further concludes that the topography of the site and excess right- of-way along the frontage road have created unique circumstances regarding placement for the new structures. For these reasons, a recommendation of approval is given for the variance for setback. Regarding the parking variance, staff concludes that there is no hardship because there are alternatives available. Therefore, a recommendation of denial for the parking variance is given. In regard to the amendment to the final development plan, staff concludes the proposal is consistent with the underlying outline development plan and that all requirements for a PCD plan amendment have been met. For these reasons, a recommendation of approval is given with the following conditions: 1. Additional guest parking spaces be pursued elsewhere on the site. 2. A pedestrian connection be made between the southern and northern portions of the site. VII. RECOMMENDED MOTIONS VARIANCE - SETBACK Option A: "I move that the request for approval of a setback variance next right-of-way for property located at 4700 Tabor Street be APPROVED for the following reasons: A variance is required to allow construction on the property as shown on the development plan. The topography of the site and the excess right-of-way along the frontage road have created unique circumstances." Option B: "I move that the request for approval of a setback variance next right-of-way for property located at 4700 Tabor Street be DENIED for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3." VARIANCE - PARKING Option A: "I move that the request for approval of a parking variance for property located at 4700 Tabor Street be DENIED for the following reasons: 1. There is no hardship or unique circumstances. 2. There are alternatives available." WZ-98-6 Page 8 /4- 7 Option B: "I move that the request for approval of a parking variance for property located at 4700 Tabor Street be APPROVED for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3." FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Option A: "I move that Case No. WZ-98-6, a request for approval of an amendment to a Planned Commercial final development plan for property located at 4700 Tabor Street, be APPROVED for the following reasons: I . The proposal is consistent with the underlying outline development plan. 2. All requirements for a PCD plan amendment have been met. With the following conditions: 1. Additional guest parking spaces be procured elsewhere on the site. 2. A pedestrian connection be made between the southern and northern portions of the site." Option B: "I move that Case No. WZ-98-6, a request for approval of an amendment to a Planned Commercial final development plan for property located at 4700 Tabor Street, be DENIED for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3." C:\Bubara\PCRPTS\WZ986. W PD WZ-98-6 Page 9 S U i$ Z o~ VII i i I NMFhT RIPBE'-~ I LQ-00d9 .Z#6 I PI ,ppISTRiAI pro. ~ ka-83•5 wz--12-0 PID -,M,y P-AWMR 1L. I ' PI D F¢-7 26 PAW 7PARK I ~ t 5 Y T TRKT 6 " -12 WZ-Te-IID ro r-RaetrASe ~ rnR n _ _ ;=1 - - -r-T ,1 ~ to-Teals i ~ ~ ~ 1 1 uz-ea-5 ~ p I E) Lxm~ m. o s 1 ~ TABOR PfiCPHtTIFS 1 A'I / G-1 PGD I G-I SIEO •JIT s• R 1~ n _-I1 ~c- A-1 I cX,-l i/3i7- ' 6 ` BAPTIST HOME ASSOCIATION OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS, INC. 5280 Vivian Street • Arvada, Colorado 80002-1923 • (303) 424-5589 March 13, 1998 Meredith Reckert, Planner City of Wheatridge Planning and Development Dept. 7500 West 29tl~ Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80034 Re: Request for variance for new construction at Vista Village Independent Living, 4700 Tabor Street, Wheat Ridge, CO Dear Ms. Reckert: In the letter we received from you in March, 98, you noted that the set back for one of the duplexes planned for construction in Vista Village Retirement Community - Independent Living apartments at 4700 Tabor Street was inside the thirty (30) foot set back zone. Robert Taylor of R&R Engineering and Surveying reported that this was a concern. He suggested that I had the opportunity to apply to the Planning Commission for a variance allowing the proposed building to remain as shown in the site plan previously submitted. There are several reasons why I feel this request should be considered: 1) The duplex was originally laid out to match the set back for an existing structure which is being demolished in the Village. This infringement has not been a problem in the past and I reasoned that the set back could remain the same - similar to a "grandfather clause" on previous construction. The proposed building is separated from the roadway by open space and a steep hillside. . 2) The infringement is on land that was formerly owned by Baptist Home Association. The adjacent parcel of land was deeded to the Colorado Department of Highways (without compensation) in 1987, when the North I-70 Service Road was upgraded and extended from Tabor to Ward Road. Since that time, staff from our facilities has provided maintenance to that public area including mowing, watering, and snow removal from the sidewalk to accommodate pedestrian traffic. 3) I am concerned that moving the new structure further North or West from where planned will necessitate removal of several long standing trees, both soft and hardwood. The immediate area needs to retain as much of this established growth as possible; as protection from hillside erosion, to dampening the noise level coming from the highway, and to continue the beautification of Vista Village. Division of American Baptist Homes of the Midwest Eden Prairie, Minnesota Paget 4) Finally, the relocation of the proposed duplex into any other area of Vista Village will greatly inhibit the amount of open space that the residents now enjoy. Leaving the unit tucked close to that hillside will create a very open, secure, and noise free environment for the residents living there. We need to do all that we possibly can to retain the central park area at The Village for the quiet enjoyment of its residents. Baptist Home Association and I thank for your time and consideration in this matter. If there is anything else we can provide to facilitate this request, please let me know. Sincerely, 2 Floyd H. Harrison, Jr. President & CEO, BHA A- i~' The Gity of 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80215-6713 (303) 234-5900 City Admin. Fax # 234-5924 April 10, 1998 Dear Property Owner: Police Dept. Fax # 235-2949 Wheat Ridge This is to inform you that Case No. WZ-98-6 which is a request for approval of an amendment to the Mountain Vista Planned Commercial Development final development plan to allow for the construction of six additional independent living units (3 duplex units) and covered parking on the southern portion of the property located at 4700 Tabor Street will be heard by the Wheat Ridge Planning Commission in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue. The meeting will be held on May 7, 1998, at 7:30 p.m. All owners and/or their legal counsel of the parcel under consideration must be present at this hearing before the Planning Commission. As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to notify any other persons whose presence is desired at this hearing. If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2846. Thank you. Planning Division. d:\...\pcrpts\plangcom\pubhrg\wz986. ,r, RECYCLED PAPER m SENDER: I also wish to receive the 2 • Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. y • Complete items 3, 4a, and 4b. following SBNICBS (for an m • Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this extra fee): card to you. m • Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does not 1. ❑ Addressee's Address j permit. . Wnte 'Return Receipt Requestetl"on the mailpiece below the article number. m 2. El Restricted Delivery W m E . The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date delivered. Consult postmaster for fee. 2 0 3. Article Addressed to: 4a. Article N v umber r~ Baptist Home Assn. Floyd Harrison 4b. Service Type 5 0 4700 Tabor Street d ❑ Registered Certified o Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 COO d rn ❑ Express Mail nsured e w `.9 q W29806 ~ ' El Return Receipt for Merchandise El COD 06 h I 7. Date of Delivery ' o 5. Received By: (Print Name) b 8. Addressee's Address (Only if requested Y F UU and fee is paid) LLI .._.e Slangigre: (AddresseeVr Agent) ~ SENDER: D • Complete items 1 and/or2 for additional services. I also wish to receive the 0 • Complete items 3 41 and 4b , , . ppp 0 cam to you. , follow. d • Print your name and addresaon the reverse of this form shat we can return this extra fee)services (for an j Attach • this to the frontof the mailpiece, or on the bac P. e form k if sc ' m permit. 0 1. ❑ Addressee's Add W " ~ • rite ress Refum Receipt Requested"on the mailpiece below tlt~ article number 2.0 Restrict ad elivery • The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was detvEr delive d y re erJpnd the date 0 3. Article Addressed to Consult postmaster for fee o . d 1 - 4a. Article Number Linda Dadls(nan/A.Hamby Z , ~o3 11771 W 9 X E 4 th Ave. 4b. Service Type $ Wheat,Rldge, CO 80033 ❑ Registered Certified WZ9806 ❑ Express Mail Insured rn M ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ COD o ~ S I' i G - 7. Date of Delivery p 5. Received By: (print Name) w 8. Addressee's Address (Only if requested ~ Y and fee is paid) 6. Signature: (Addressee or Agent) 0 t X r. L e PS Form 3811, December 1994 1'2"'-9&B-q229 Domestic Return Recei t p / 4+ Print your name and address on the reverse of this forth so that we can re um card to you. • Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does not Permit 1. ❑ Addressee's Address O m t • Write "Return Receipt Requested"on the mailpiece below the article number. • The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the d t 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery d N a e delivered. Consult postmaster for fee 1 Harold Kunz - 4a. Article N . a umber . 'a . 11445 W. 1-70 Frontage Road North -7 7 S-7 -76 4b. Service Type Wheat Ride, CO 80033 WZ9806 ❑ Registered Certified o i f r ❑ Express Mail Insured 0 ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ COD 7. Date of De'v ~ y U 0 5. Received By: (Print Name) 8. Address es Address (Only if requested m and fee is paid) 0 t 6. Signet re: Address or Agent) h X PS Form 3811, December 199 10259598-s-0229 /41 Domestic Return Receipt d SENDER: 9 W' • Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. • Complete items 3 4a and 4b I also wish to receive the N m , , . • Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this card to you. following services (for an extra fee): m • Aftach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does not permit. 1. 0 Addressee's Address 2 • Write -Return Receipt Requested' on the mailpiece below the article number. • The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and th d d li 2. Restricted Delivery y 0 e ate e vered. 3. Article Addressed to: Consult Postmaster for fee. g Nina Casciano 6854 W. 76th Place Arvada, Co 80033 I Wz9806 I t ~I ~ 5. ecei ad By: (Print Name 6. Signature: (Addressee or Agent) 0 T X A PS Form 381:1, December 1994 AI r 4b. Service Type v 0 Registered Certified 0 Express Mail Insured 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise 0 COD 0 7. Date of Delivery ee s Address (Only if requested i aid) m c a 'erg omestic Return Receipt NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge PLANNING COMMISSION on May-7,1998, at 7:30 p.m. at 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge; Colorado. All interested citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. The following petitions shall be heard: Case No. WZ=98-06:°,An application from Baptist Home Association of the Rocky Mountains, Inc. for approval of an amendment to the Mountain Vista Retirement Village Planned Community Development (PCD) final development plan with a setback variance for the construction of six independent living units located at 4700 Tabor Street. Said property is legally described as follows: Lot 4, Mountain Vista Retirement Village located in Section 17 and 20, Township 3 South, Range 69 West, 6r" Principal Meridian, City of Wheat Ridge, State of Colorado. 2. Case No. WZ-98-09: An application from Daniel Mahoney for approval of a zone change from Residential-Three to Restricted-Commercial to convert existing residence to a commercial office use. Said property is located at 6185 W. 38" Avenue and legally described as follows: That part of the East 1.5 acres of the East % of the Southwest 1 /4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 24, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the 6`h Principal Meridian, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of the East 1/2, southwest 1/4, south east 1/4, southwest 1/4 of said section 24; thence northerly 30.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence Westerly 99.35 feet; thence Northerly 180.09 feet; thence Easterly 99.36 feet; thence Southerly 180.09 feet to the True Point of Beginning, except the North 4.5 feet as described in deed reported July 14, 1969, in Book 2117 at Page 262. - Case No. WS-98-02: An application by 44 Eldridge, LLC for approval of a 29 lot subdivision for the purpose of development an industrial park located at approximately 13500 W. 44`h Avenue and legally described as follows: A tract of land located in the East %2 of Section 19 and in the West %2 of Section 20. All in Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the 6ih Principal Meridian, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, described as follows: Commencing at the center of said Section 19, thence S00°08'41 "E, 35.28 feet along the North-South centerline of said Section 19 to the Southerly right-of-way line of W. 44" Avenue conveyed to Jefferson County as described in warranty deed recorded in Book 323 at Page 323 of the records of Jefferson County, Colorado, and the True Point of Beginning; thence Easterly 107.62 feet along the Southerly right-of-way line of said W. 44`h Avenue and along the arc of a curve concave to the North to a point tangent, said arc having a radius of 995.00 feet, a central angle of 6°11'50" and being subtended by a chord that bears N80°22'35"E, 107.57 feet; thence N77° 16'40"E, 3093.84 feet along the Southerly right-of-way line of said W. 44`h Avenue to a point of curve to the right; thence Easterly 315.95 feet along the Southerly right-of-way line of said W. 44th Avenue and along the arc of said curve to a point tangent, said arc having a radius of 1392.50 feet, a central angle of 13 °00'00" and being subtended by a chord that bears N83 °46'40"E, 315.27 feet; thence S89°43'20"E, 530.82 feet along the Southerly right-of-way line of said W. 44" Avenue to the East line of the South % of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 20; thence S00°05'46"E, 119.94 feet along the East line of the South of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 20 to the most Northerly comer of that tract of land conveyed to the Department of Highways, State of Colorado, as described in special warranty deed recorded in Book 1859 at Page 72 of the records of Jefferson County, Colorado; thence S64°20'29"W, 33.20 feet along the Northwesterly line of that tract of land as described in said Book 1859 at Page 72; thence S31 °24'20"W, 609.87 feet along the Northwesterly line of that tract of land as described in said Book 1859 at Page 72 to the East-West centerline of said Section 20; thence S89°23'29"W, 971.10 feet along the East-West centerline of said Section 20 to the West 1/4 comer of said Section 20; thence S00°22'26"W, 275.38 feet along the West line of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 20 to the Northeast comer of that tract of land conveyed to the State Department of Highways, Division of Highways, State of Colorado as described in special warranty deed recorded in book 2177 at Page 367 of the records of Jefferson County, Colorado; thence S87°15'49"W, 2456.00 feet along the Northerly line of that tract of land as described in said Book 2177 at Page 367; thence N76°06'56"W, 199.73 feet along the Northerly line of that tract of land as described in said Book 2177 at Page 367 to the North-South centerline of said Section 19; thence NO0°08'41"W, 278.94 feet along the North-South centerline of said Section 19 to the True Point of Beginning. 0.o Barbara Delgadillo, PV nning Secretary ATTEST: ~ Wanda Sang, City C'1 rk To be Published: April 17, 1998 Wheat Ridge Transcript CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission DATE OF MEETING: April 2, 1998 WZ-98-6/Mountain Vista DATE PREPARED: March 27, 1998 CASE MANAGER: M. Reckert CASE NO. & NAME: ACTION REQUESTED: LOCATION OF REQUEST: NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT(S): NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER(S): PCD Final Plan Amendment 4700 Tabor Street Mountain Vista Retirement Village 4800 Tabor Street Baptist Home Assoc. Of the Rockies 5280 Vivian Street Arvada, CO 80002 APPROXIMATE AREA: 5.46 Acres PRESENT ZONING: Planned Commercial Development PRESENT LAND USE: Nursing Home, Independent Living SURROUNDING ZONING: N: I, S: A-1, E: PID, W: PID SURROUNDING LAND USE: N, E,: Commercial, W: Commercial, Vacant, S: 1-70 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE AREA: Industrial DATE PUBLISHED: March 13, 1998 DATE POSTED: March 19, 1998 DATED LEGAL NOTICES SENT: March 9, 1998 - ENTER INTO RECORD: Q COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) ZONING ORDINANCE SLIDES SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS (X) EXHIBITS Q OTHER JURISDICTION: The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge and all notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. I. REQUEST The applicant requests approval of an amendment to the Mountain Vista Retirement Village Planned Commercial Development Plan final development plan with a setback variance. The purpose of the request is for the addition of six independent living units and carports for property located at 4700 Tabor Street (Vista Village Retirement Community). II. CASE HISTORY The property in question was rezoned from PRD, A-2 and Industrial to Planned Commercial Development with an outline development plan and final development plan and plat approvals pursuant to Case Nos. WZ-87-4 and WZ-90-11. At the time of rezoning, the, nursing home was in existence on the north side of the property with 31 independent living units in place on the south side. An addition to west side of the nursing home structure was completed in 1993. Please find attached a reduced copy of the existing final development plan. At the time of zoning and development plan approval, the outline plan allowed for a total of 40 independent living units where only 31 were in place. The applicant is requesting approval of this request to add six additional units plus coverage of some of the existing parking spaces with carports. III. AGENCY REFERRALS Valley Water District is working with the applicant to resolve service issues. Additional main line extensions with looping may be required with appropriate easements. Additional water service lines and tap fees will be required for the new units. Public Works has reviewed and approved an amended drainage report. No public improvements will be required. The traffic division has no comments. Police Department has commented relative to crime prevention. Their comments have been forwarded to the applicant. Arvada Fire Protection District will require an additional fire hydrant in the vicinity of the new units in the southwest corner of the property. Water line looping will be required. IV. VARIANCE CRITERIA The required side yard setback next to a street is 30'. The required front yard setback for any structure is required to be a minimum of 50'. However, if the structure is less than 35' in height and the front yard is completely landscaped, this setback can be reduced down to 30'. The property is addressed to Tabor Street and has an access from Tabor, although the main entrance for the development is from the I-70 service road. In any event, the setback along the frontage WZ-98-6 Page road is required to be 30' where only an 8' setback is provided from one of the new structures and the carports at the southwest corner of the property. As such, a specific variance of 22' is required. The applicant has submitted a written justification to support the request for variance included under Exhibit `B'. Staff would note that there is an existing structure with a non- conforming setback in this area which will be removed if the development plan amendment is approved. Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a variance request: 1. Can the property in question yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located? If the variance is not granted, the property can still be used for independent living. Alternate locations for the new units is limited because of severe slopes along the southwest, west and northwest property lines. There is an existing structure in this location with a non-conforming setback. 2. Is the plight of the owner due to unique circumstances? Circumstances are somewhat unique because of the severe slopes on the property. 3. If the variation were granted, would it alter the essential character of the locality? In 1987, the I-70 frontage was realigned and reconstructed adjacent to Vista Village on the south and west sides. No additional right-of-way was obtained from Vista Village although there was a permanent slope easement dedicated to the City. This slope easement is located opposite of the intersection of Tabor Street with the frontage road. It is located to the west of the buildings where variances are needed. There is excess right-of-way between the southern property line of Vista Village and the physical improvements for the I-70 frontage road. This right-of-way varies in width from 5' at the very southwest corner of the property to 40' at the southwest corner of the western most carport structure. There is 60' of excess right-of-way adjacent to the duplex structure needing the variance. Because of the excess right-of-way, staff concludes that there would not be a negative affect on the character of the area because visually, the new structures appear to be setback an appropriate amount from the roadway. The area used as excess right-of-way will never be developed and should not be needed for future frontage road improvements. WZ-98-6 Page 3 4. Would the particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved result in a particular hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out? There is somewhat of a hardship because of slopes on the property and the excessive right-of-way on the south. There are alternatives available such as not providing covered parking and shifting the easterly building to the northwest, thus reducing the amount of variance required. 5. Would the conditions upon which the petition for a variation is based be applicable, generally, to the other property within the same zoning classification? A precedent could be established for similar requests if no findings of hardship or unique circumstances are made. 6. Is the purpose of the variation based exclusively upon a desire to make money out of the property The purpose of the variance is to build additional units and to provide covered parking. Has the alleged difficulty or hardship been created by any person presently having an interest in the property? The hardship has been self-imposed. Alternatives available include not having covered parking in this area and shifting the building on the east 10' to the northwest, reducing the amount of variance needed from 22' to 12'. 8. Would the granting of the variations be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located? Granting of the variance would be not be detrimental to the public welfare as there is adequate fire access and a substantial separation from the frontage road improvements. 9. Would the proposed variation impair the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion in the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. There should be no impact on the amount of light and air because there are no adjacent structures which would be affected. The variance would not increase congestion in the public street . Adequate provisions for fire safety are made with the installation of a new WZ-98-6 Page hydrant in this vicinity. It is impossible for staff to ascertain whether there will be a negative affect on property values in the neighborhood. 10. If it is found in criteria 8 and 9 above that granting of the variation would not be detrimental or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood, and it is also found that public health and safety, public facilities and surrounding property values would not be diminished or impaired, then would the granting of the variance result in a benefit or contribution to the neighborhood or the community as distinguished from an individual benefit on the part of the applicant, or would granting of the variance result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities? The benefit of the new units is additional affordable housing for elderly persons in the area regardless of whether or not the variance is granted. To Staff s knowledge, approval of the variance would not result in an accommodation to persons with a disability V. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN The applicant is proposing a final development plan which allows for the construction of six independent living units in three duplex buildings. Two of the duplex buildings would be located at the very southwest corner of the property with carport structures. These buildings will displace existing maintenance buildings. Setback variances are required for the carports and the eastern structure. It appears that there is room to shift the eastern building to the northwest. The other duplex building is proposed for the northeast portion of the site where there are two existing structures with nine units. The new building will displacing existing parking (nine spaces), drive area and landscaping. The displaced parking will be relocated in front of the southern building in the cluster with two additional spaces in front of the new units plus one handicapped space for a total of 12 within this cluster of buildings. Staff is somewhat concerned for crowding between the western building and the new units as they will be roughly 30' apart. Since all of the units on the property have only one bedroom, required parking is 1.25 spaces for every unit. With 37 units, the parking requirement would be 47 spaces plus five visitor spaces bringing the total requirement to 52 spaces. A total of 51 spaces are provided. Staff has recommended that additional guest parking be interspersed throughout the development. Staff has also recommended that a pedestrian link be installed between the north and south parts of the overall development. The proposed construction will match existing architectural style and material currently used. If the proposed amendment is approved, building coverage will be 37%, hard surfaced coverage will be 28% and landscaped coverage will be 34%. These figures are consistent with the underlying outline development plan. WZ-98-6 Page 5 All requirements for a Planned Commercial Development final development plan have been met. VI. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION Staff concludes that a variance is required to allow construction on the property as shown on the final development plan. Staff further concludes that the topography of the site and excess right- of-way along the frontage road have created unique circumstances. However, there are alternatives available which would reduce the amount of encroachment needed. For these reasons, a recommendation of approval is given for the variance with the condition that the carports be eliminated and the duplex structure be shifted northwest as far as possible. In regard to the amendment to the final development plan, staff concludes the proposal is consistent with the underlying outline development plan and that all requirements for a PCD plan amendment have been met. For these reasons, a recommendation of approval is given with the following conditions: 1. Additional guest parking spaces be procured elsewhere on the site. 2. A pedestrian connection be made between the southern and northern portions of the site. VII. RECOMMENDED MOTIONS VARIANCE Option A: "I move that the request for approval of a setback variance next right-of-way for property located at 4700 Tabor Street be APPROVED for the following reasons: 1 A variance is required to allow construction on the property as shown on the development plan. 2. The topography of the site and the excess right-of-way along the frontage road have created unique circumstances. With the following conditions: 1. The carport structures be eliminated. 2. The duplex structure be shifted as far northwest as possible (up to 10')." Option B:"I move that the request for approval of a setback variance next right-of-way for property located at 4700 Tabor Street be DENIED for the following reasons: 1. 2. Y' WZ-98-6 Page FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Option A: "Lmove that Case No. WZ-98-6, a request for approval of an amendment to a Planned Commercial final development plan for property located at 4700 Tabor Street, be APPROVED for the following reasons: 1. The proposal is consistent with the underlying outline development plan. 2. All requirements for a PCD plan amendment have been met. With the following conditions: 1. Additional guest parking spaces be procured elsewhere on the site. 2. A pedestrian connection be made between the southern and northern portions of the site." Option B: "I move that Case No. WZ-98-6, a request for approval of an amendment to a Planned Commercial final development plan for property located at 4700 Tabor Street, be DENIED for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3" d9...\pc`pts\wz986 WZ-98-6 Page 7 -500 WEST 29TH AVENUE The City of P 0 Box 638 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80034-1'c2S 13031 234-5900 GWheat City Admin. Fax # 234-5924 Police Deot. Fax» 235 2949 GRidge POSTING CERTIFICATION CASE NO. PLANNING COMMISSION - CITY COUNCIL - BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (Circle One) HEARING DATE: y l rga- Z, /M / (n a m e residing at 5--ZRO (/I LliA , as the applicant for Case No. a r e s s , hereby certify that I have posted the Notice of Public Hearing at ' 700 / Va,---~" , (!a j dra (/I o c a t i o Un ) on this A~~ ~ day of /Az ra , 19 and do hereby certify that said sign has been posted and remained in place for fifteen (15) days prior to and including the scheduled day of public hearing of this case. The sign was posted in the position shown on the map below. NOTE Signature: This form must be submitted at the public hearing on this case and will be placed in the applicant's case file at the Department of Planning and Development. ' =I^ 4 <pc> rev. i I A 3 4165 4646 4761 p \ M 46 A 4'!56 4h5 47p 31MLS ST ` V VN The City of 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE G WHEAT RIDGE. CO 8Q215-6713 (303) 234-5900 Wh e at City Admin. Fax # 234-5924 Police Dept. Fax # 235-2949 Ridge March 31, 1998 Joel Tompkins, P.E. R & R Engineers-Surveyors, Inc. 10 Inverness Drive East Suite 229 Englewood, Colorado 80112 Re: Vista Village Assisted Living, West 49t° Avenue & Tabor Street - Second Review Comments of Final Drainage Study, Grading & Erosion Control Plan Dear Mr. Tompkins, I have completed the second review of the above referenced documents for the Vista Village Assisted Living project received on March 27, 1998 and have the following comments: Drainage Study (Discussion) Cover Page 1_ P.E. seal and signature will be required on two sets of the final approved report. Drainage/Grading & Erosion Control Plan 1. Please note the existing grade of West 49`h Avenue. 2. Please note clearly on detention pond number 2 the elevation and limits of the 100-year storm volume. 3. Please provide sheet reference for all cross section details. 4. Please note on all plans and cross section details the location and alignment of the required public improvements along the West 49°h Avenue frontage. 5. Final plans (2 sets) will need engineer's stamp and signature. Street Construction/Traffic Drawings (West 49"' Avenue) The requested engineered plan and profile street construction/ traffic engineering drawings were not provided with the second submittal package. 0 PFOI'[ EC PAPER Mr. Joel Tompkins, P.E. R & R Engineers Page 2 Application for Minor Dumping/Landfill Prior to the commencement of any onsite for Dumping/Landfill Permit, along with submitted for review and approval. For submittal in the second review package, provided. ?ermit grading, an Application fees due will need to be your information and a copy of this permit is Public Improvements Cost Estimate & Guarantee Prior to any construction commencing for the required public improvements within the West 49th Avenue right-of-way, an itemized engineer's cost estimate will need to be submitted for review and approval. Upon acceptance of this estimate a letter of credit will need to be submitted for review and approval. Right-of-Way Construction Permit(s)/Licensing Prior to any construction of the public improvements, the necessary right-of-way construction permit(s) and respective licensing will need to be processed by the City. Please return all red-lined prints with the third submittal. IPegeKn7udson, have any questions, please contact me at 235-2868. Sely, G M.P.A. Development Review Engineer cc: Dave Kotecki, Sr. Project Engineer Steve Nguyen, Traffic Engineer John McGuire, City Surveyor Meredith Reckert, Sr..Planner File The ity of 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE G = T WHE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80215-6713 (303) 234-5900 h a at City Admin. Fax 4 234-5924 Police Dept. Fax : 235-2949 GRi d ge March 9, 1998 Dear Property Owner: This is to inform you that Case No. WZ-98-6 which is a request for approval of an amendment to the Mountain Vista Planned Co cial Development final development plan to allow for the construction MSH ditional duplex units and covered parking on the southern portion of the property located at 4700 Tabor Street will be heard by the Wheat Ridge Planning Commission in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue. The meeting will be held on April 2, 1998, at 7:30 p.m. All owners and/or their legal counsel of the parcel under consideration must be present at this hearing before the Planning Commission. As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to notify any other persons whose presence is desired at this hearing. If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2846. Thank you. Planning Division. d9...\pcrpts\plangcom\pubhrg\wz986. RECYCLED PAPER - _ _ - I also wish to receive the addhionel services. m SENDER: hems 1 following services (for an this gf: ce, f ba, and bb. w Complete .Complete dams a, r name and address an the reverse of this ' ma form 1 p Addressee's Address t ace does not ' f= ~ al print you - card to You. or on ofthemaj to the front s c back D the Delivery 2. ❑ Restricted ber N . •~ach this form u~.lhe meilPiece below the article num a . Refum onsult postmaster for fee "It. C trom the article was delivered and the date Receipt Req ' t •Wme .The Return Receipt vnll show to w delivered. tN~jumber bee R G .0 3. Article Addressed to: b / / V Service Typa d w d y $ A, Ham b. Certifie ' aLinda923A A [2 Registered Insured a Ve 11771 W' 90033 Express all rMerchandise COD f o s~e CO. Wheat o C RalumReceipt o W Lu 7, Date of Delivery > Z 9g - W - (Only if requested ddressee's Address c C . 4 - - Print Name) 8. A and fee is Paid) - r- cc g, Received By: ( l t. W Signature: (Addressee or Agent 6 eturn Recetp i . o ig T c e7-e-cn9 Domest ,0259s 3811, December 1994 PS Forth Penh. uested - - m •Wrlte Refum Rec- A show to' or The Return Receipt 1 del eyed ° 3. AltdQ Addressed to /n Baptist Home C 0 4700 Tabor.St. o Wheat Ridge, o WZ-98-6 _ 5. . c lived By: (Print M' W tAddresse The City of Wheat GRidge 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80215-67 ~p~•a,..m-a, ~p 2, 0 th lace Restricted Delivery a~ as dethelivered and adad the number. date Consult postmaster for fee. 1 the adre J as de ¢ mc1 Number C~ 4b. Service Type Certified wx, p Registered r ❑ Insured^ ? ❑ Express Mail « . v IF it`3y 13 Return ReceiPtior Mercbandise f] COD 7. Date . Del'very g, Addressee's Address (Only if requested r and fee is paid) '.Agent) ,l ~;~~lettuD.Receipt --t _ - _ ® t oLC~YVF9 ~•"r1FC OOSiAGt.. ~TYM1:'L ..p Y 4j.. GA.- i r hr's ~ {_fEl dt~...."• s-JJJ P 297 656 °~c Co eszaloe SENDER: t :Complete items 1 andror 2 /or additional services. :Complete items 3, 4a, and 4b. I also wish to receive the j •Pdm your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can retum this following services (for an card to you 9 •Atfach this torn to the front of the mailpiem, or on the back i/ pemt'f e extra fee): space does not - 1. El Addressee's Address to the mail ow the numbs $ :The Ret m Receiptwishow to whom he artia a wasldelive ed and th 2. Restricted Deliver d li .2 ~ . W e vered. C y e date I ° w 3. Article Addressed to: Consult postmaster for fee. E Harold Kunz ncCle Number ° 7- e c n 11445 W. I-70 Frontage Road N. 4b. Service Type r w Wheat Ridge CO 80033 ❑ Registered p.~ ertified , ❑ Express Mail ❑ Insured C o ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ COD r WZ-98-6 7. Date of Delivery o = II 5. Received By: (Print Name) Y 8. Addresse 's Address Onl /f requested x 6. Si , atur . (A ressee Agent) and fee is paid) o ti- i X w ps Form 3811, De mbar lssa 102595-97-B-0179 Domestic Return Rec i t e p 966f Iudv,008E tmO=l sd 1 also wish to recei for the JOllowing sgrvioes 00 ddress services. this extra l'313) A ° n velum . Addressee's at we ca 0 's ENDER: tandlor2 lot addition aarmialormsoth does not 1 2 eliverY 1! o ComPlate Items and 4b. ❑ pastdcled D o.''. . -y, •Complete items 3, Asddress on the ravers or on the back -it Space astef lot teO• 0 :PdrtY umber- our name an I iece, ° w the adicl E he data Consult postm sand to Y°5 fort. to the hoot of the rns' P Iprece belo d m :poach th rRaquseted'onrthhre^eartidswasdelivem an er t' P"nil eturir ReceiP ll show to whon 4a. rticle Dumb / L'~ 0 Thep tumFeceiPt Glr J m delivered. _ Pe Certifled Im.,, ° Addressed tO: q -r. ° 3. ArflOre re Insured Nina Casciano Place ExPres Merd andise CAD 0 6854 W 76th e o i, CO 80003 Deli STY r i ° Arvada, w ddress (Only if requested d paid) a W7-9g-6 z Print Name) 5. Received Bye '97-8-0179 Domestic Return ReCeiPt 't 6. or Agent) Addressee to2ses Sig naNre: ( - X 811, December 1994 _ rm 22 ps F0 The City of 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80215-6713 (303) 234-5900 City Admin. Fax # 234-5924 March 9, 1998 Dear Property Owner: Police Dept. Fax # 235-2949 Wheat Ridge This is to inform you that Case No. WZ-98-6 which is a request for approval of an amendment to the Mountain Vista Planned Commercial Development final development plan to allow for the construction of six additional duplex units and covered parking on the southern portion of the property located at 4700 Tabor Street will be heard by the Wheat Ridge Planning Commission in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue. The meeting will be held on April 2, 1998, at 7:30 p.m. All owners and/or their legal counsel of the parcel under consideration must be present at this hearing before the Planning Commission. As an area resident or interested parry, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to notify any other persons whose presence is desired at this hearing. If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2846. Thank you. Planning Division. d:\...\pcrpts\pl angcom\pubhrg\wz986. i°0 RECYCLED PAPER 1) Situs: 11485W 1 70 FRONTAGE RD, WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 APN: 39-163-03-003 Rec Date: 12109193 Total Value: $71,690 County: JEFFERSON, CO Doc 7430 Land Value: $14,340 Use: R&D FACILITY Sale Price: Imprv Value: $57,350 Subdiv: WHEAT RIDGE INDUST PARK 1st TD: Bldg/Liv Area: 9,680 RTSQ: 69W03S16SW Rooms: Bedrms: Lot Size: A0.66 Map Loc: 15-H Zoning: Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Owners: KUNZ HAROLD D Stories: Phone: Mail: 11445 W 1 70 FRONTAGE RD N; WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 5) Situs: 11455W 1 70 FRONTAGE RD, WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 APN: 39-163-03-007 Rec Date: 04126177 Total Value: $84,970 County: JEFFERSON, CO Doc 10083 Land Value: $16,990 Use: R&D FACILITY Sale Price: Imprv Value: $67,980 Subdiv: WHEAT RIDGE INDUST PARK 1st TD: Bldg/Liv Area: 12,000 RTSQ: 69W03S16SW Rooms: Bedrms: Lot Size: A0.64 Map Loc: 15-H Zoning: Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Owners: KUNZ LEE R & HAROLD D Stories: Phone: Mail: 11445 W 1 70 FRONTAGE RD N; WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 11) Situs: , CO APN: 39-163-00-019 Rec Date: 02127195 Total Value: $15,510 County: JEFFERSON, CO Doc F20586 Land Value: $15,510 Use: RESIDENTIAL LOT Sale Price: Imprv Value: Subdiv: 1st TD: Bldg/Liv Area: RTSQ: 69W03S16SW Rooms: Bedrms: Lot Size: Al.72 Map Loc: 15-H Zoning: Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Owners: GRIFFITH WILLIAM H Stories: Phone: Mail 12) Situs: CO APN: 39-163-00-020 Rec Date: 05125181 Total Value: $15,510 County: JEFFERSON, CO Doc M 47997 Land Value: $15,510 Use: RESIDENTIAL LOT Sale Price: Imprv Value: Subdiv: 1 st TD: Bldg/Liv Area: RTSQ: 69W03S16SW Rooms: Bedrms: Lot Size: A1,72 Map Loc: 15-H Zoning: Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Owners: CASCIANO NINA Stories: Phone: Mail: 6854 W 76TH PL; ARVADA CO 80003-2303 C028 Copyright ©1996-97 Experian Page: 1 of 1 1) Situs: 11771 W 49TH AVE, WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-2125 C019 APN: 39-174-09-003 Rec Date: 12115187 Total Value:. $84,970 County: JEFFERSON, CO Doc 5468 Land Value: $16,990 Use: WAREHOUSE Sale Price: Imprv Value: $67,980 Subdiv: LEES 1st TD: Bldg/Liv Area: 12,000 RTSQ: 69W03S17SE Rooms: Bedrms: Lot Size: A2.42 Map Loc: 15-G Zoning: Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Owners: HAMBY A A/EA Stories: DADISMAN LINDA /EA Phone: Mail: 11771 W 49TH AVE; WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-2125 C019 2) Situs: 4700 TABOR ST, WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-2110 C019 APN: 39-174-09-013 Rec Date: 06/29192 Total Value: $74,630 County: JEFFERSON, CO Doc 77010 Land Value: $33,230 Use: MINE/QUARRY Sale Price: Imprv Value: $41,400 Subdiv: MOUNTAIN VISTA RETIREMENT VILLAGE 1st TD: Bldg/Liv Area: RTSQ: 69W03S17SE Rooms: Bedrms: Lot Size: A5.45 Map Loc: 15-G Zoning: Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Owners: BAPTIST HOME ASSOCIATION O Stories: FLOYD H HARRISON JR C/O Phone: Mail: 4700 TABOR ST; WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-2110 C019 4) Situs: 4800 TABOR ST, WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-2112 C019 APN: 39-174-10-002 Rec Date: 07/31190 Total Value: $7,350 County: JEFFERSON, CO Doc 68941 Land Value: $7,350 Use: INDUSTRIAL LOT Sale Price: Imprv Value: Subdiv: LAKEMONT CENTER STAGE 02 1st TD: Bldg/Liv Area: RTSQ: 69W03S17SE Rooms: Bedrms: Lot Size: A0.72 Map Loc: 15-G Zoning: Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Owners: LAKE FRONT PARTNERS Stories: Phone: Mail: PO BOX 2470; DENVER CO 80201-2470 8030 Copyright © 1996-97 Experian Page: 1 of 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge PLANNING COMMISSION on April 2,1998, at 7:30 p.m. at 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. The following petitions shall be heard: Case No. WZ-98-6: An application from Baptist Home Association of the Rocky Mountains, Inc. for approval of an amendment to the Mountain Vista Retirement Village Planned Community Development (PCD) final development plan for the construction of six independent living units located at 4700 Tabor Street. Said property is legally described as follows: Lot 4, Mountain Vista Retirement Village located in Section 17 and 20, Township 3 South Range 69 West, sixth principal meridian, City of Wheat Ridge, State of Colorado. ,c Barbara Delgadill , lanning Secretary ATTEST: Wanda Sang, Cit} Jerk To be Published: March 13, 1998 Wheat Ridge Transcript a:\wz986pn VALLEY WATER DISTRICT P.O. BOX 9 12101 WEST 52ND AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80034 TELEPHONE 424-9661 FAX 424-0828 March 12, 1998 Meredith Reckert City of Wheat Ridge 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Dear Meredith: Valley Water District has reviewed Case #WZ-98-6/Mtn. Vista at 4700 Tabor Street for the construction of six independent units and offer the following: 1. At the present time it is unknown if public facilities are adequate to serve the development. Additional lines may be required to meet Arvada Fire Protection District requirements. 2. An easement to Valley Water District would be needed from owner if additional main line extensions are needed to meet Arvada Fire Protection District requirements. 3. Additional water service lines and tap fees will be needed to service the development of the six independent units. Should you have any questions, please call me at 303-424-9661. Sincerely, ff6 6-z Robert Arnold Manager 7500 West 29th Avenue ®02 The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Wheat Telephone 303/ 237-6944 Ridge February 24, 1998 The Wheat Ridge Department of Community Development has received a request for approval of an amendment to a Planned Commercial Development final development plan at the property described below.. Your response to the following questions and any comments on this proposal would be appreciated by March 13, 1998. No response from you by this date will constitute no objections or concerns regarding this proposal. CASE NO: WZ-98-6/Mountain Vista LOCATION: 4700 Tabor Street REQUESTED ACTION: Amendment to a Planned Commercial Development final development plan. PURPOSE: Construction of six independent living units. APPROXIMATE AREA: 5.46 acres. 1. Are public facilities or services provided by your agency adequate to serve this development? YES_ NO . If"NO", please explain bej w. Unknown 4t present-addl. water line ext. and hydrants may be needed to meet AF ~ requirements 2. Are service lines available to the development? YES X NO . If "NO", please explain below.pddl. water service lines at owners expense and unit tap fees will need to be paid by owner. 3. Do you have adequate capacities to service the development? YES X NO If "NO", please explain below. 4. Can and will your agency service this proposed development subject to your rules and regulations? YES X NO If "NO", please explain below. 5. Are there any concerns or problems you agency has identified which would or should affect approval of this request? Owner would need to provide easement for water line ext.if needed to meet Please reply, to: Meredith Reckert fire dept. regulations Department of Planning & Development DISTRIBUTION: X Water District (Valley) X Sanitation District(Fruitdale) X Fire District (Arvada) Adjacent City X Public Service Co- x US West Communications State Lane Use Commission State Geological Survey Colorado Dept. Of Transportation Colorado Div. Of Wildlife Jeffco Health Department Jeffco Schools Jeffco Commissioners X TCI of Colorado X WHEAT RIDGE Post Office X WHEAT RIDGE Police Department X WHEAT RIDGE Public Works Dept. X WHEAT RIDGE Park & Rec Commission X WHEAT RIDGE Forestry Division WHEAT RIDGE Building Division "The Carnation City" 7500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Wheat Telephone 303/ 237-6944 FAX 303/234-5924 March 11, 1998 Robert Taylor, P.L.S. R & R Engineers 10 Inverness Drive East #229 Englewood, Colorado 80112 Dear Robert: Ridge This letter is in regard to your submittal for amendment to the Mountain Vista Retirement Community Planned Commercial Development final development plan. I have reviewed the submittal and have concluded that the following needs to be added to the plan face or addressed otherwise: 1. The title should be revised to read: "Mountain Vista Retirement Village" "Final Development Plan" "Amendment No. V "An Official Development Plan in the City of Wheat Ridge" "Lot 4, Mountain Vista Retirement 2. Sheet Nos. A3.0 and A5.0 can be removed from the plan set. 3. The sheets should be renumbered to read "Sheet 1 of 4, sheet 2 of 4, etc" 4. Since this is not a platting document, the signature blocks for the Director of public Works, the Director of Parks and Recreation, Public Service Company and U.S. West Communications can be removed. 5. The site data breakdown should be revised to reflect the existing plan and the amended plan in regard to the following items: number of units, property area, building area, parking, drives and other hard areas, and landscaped areas. The last four items should be shown in square footage and in percentages of total site. A parking breakdown including the number of existing and proposed including the number of handicapped should be added for the entire development (Lot 4). 6. Case history box with the following case numbers: WZ-72-08, WZ-85-4, WZ-87-4, WZ-90-11, WZ-98-6 7. The following note: "This development plan amendment affects only Lot 4 of Mountain Vista Retirement Village Subdivision. All development within Lots 1, 2, 3 and 5 of Mountain Vista Retirement Village Subdivision shall be consistent with the previous development plan recorded at Reception No. 92077010". 8. The carport elevations should be added to the elevation sheet. 9. If possible, Staff would like to see an internal pedestrian link between Lot 4 and the lots to the north. 10. Existing and proposed sign locations with sign sizes and sign heights. 11. Dumpster locations with screening 12. Handicapped and visitor parking (The code requires that two percent of the required parking be handicapped accessible. Design of these spaces is required to be 16'x 18'. The parking requirement for this specific use is 1. spaces for each 2 bedroom unit plus one additional space per each 10 required for visitor parking.) Keep in mind that the required front setback in a Planned Commercial Development is 30' (when the height of the building is less than 35' and is completely landscaped). The proposed development plan shows a setback of 8' for the southern-most buildings which will require a specific variance. The Planning Commission and City Council have the ability to grant variances when they are included with another request such as a development plan approval. Therefore, action can be taken on the variance at the same hearings as the development plan amendment. Please find attached the criteria used to evaluate a variance. These criteria should be addressed in writing by the applicant as justification for the variance approval. This can be submitted and used as an exhibit in the staff report to the Planning Commission. At the time of this writing I am not sure whether staff will support the variance or not. Attached are responses received from other City departments or outside service agencies. All of their concerns must be addressed. This case is scheduled for a Planning Commission public hearing on April 2, 1998. Please submit 15 sets of the revised plans with the variance justification to this office no later than March 25, 1998. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me at 235-2848. Sincerely, Meredith Reckert Senior Planner cc: WZ-98-6 file MEMORANDUM Approved Date TO: Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner FROM: Greg Knudson, Development Review Engineer DATE: March 2, 1998 SUBJ: Mountain Vista Retirement Village, 4700 Tabor Street - WZ-98-6 The Public Works Department has reviewed the Planning Department referral dated February 24, 1998 for the above referenced site, and has the following comments: 1. The required final drainage report amending the existing drainage report has been reviewed and approved. 2. We will need a completed Dumping/Landfill Permit for review and approval. In conjunction with this permit an erosion control plan may need to be submitted for review and approval. 3. The existing plat has been reviewed in conjunction with the scope of the proposed project, with no revisions required at this time. 4. No public improvements will be required to be constructed with this project. S. The Traffic Department has no comments at this time since the proposed developments all front private driveways. cc: Alan White, Planning & Development Director Dave Kotecki, Sr. Project Engineer Steve Nguyen, Traffic Engineer John McGuire, City Surveyor File The ity of 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80215-6713 (303) 234-5900 City Admin. Fax # 234-5924 March 2, 1998 Police Dept. Fax # 235-2949 Joel Tompkins, P.E. R & R Engineers-Surveyors, Inc. 10 Inverness Drive East Suite 229 Englewood, Colorado 80112 GWheat Ridge Re: Vista Village Assisted Living, West 49th Avenue & Tabor Street - First Review Comments of Final Drainage Study, Grading & Erosion Control Plan Dear Mr. Tompkins, I have completed the first review of the above referenced documents for the Vista Village Assisted Living project received on February 18, 1998, and have the following comments: Drainage Study (Discussion) Cover Page 1. Please provide P.E. seal and signature on the final approved report. 2. Please provide the exact address of the project. Page 4 1. Please include the historic 5 and 100-year values calculated in this section. Page 5 1. The signature blocks provided for the Swadley and Juchem Ditch Companies on page 10 of this report, need to also be provided on the plan. 2. Please include in the discussion the developed 5 and 100-year values calculated for each respective sub-basin. Page 6 1. Detention pond discussion needs to include total length of 12- inch PVC pipe proposed and orifice plate diameters for respective detention pond release structures. CO RECYCLED PAPER Joel Tompkins, P.E. R & R Engineers Page 2 2. Detention pond #1 discussion needs to include volumes required and provided for 5 and 100-year storms. 3. Detention pond #2 discussion needs to include volumes provided for 5 and 100-year storms. 4. Please confirm in discussion that both proposed detention ponds have required 1-foot minimum freeboard. 5. Please include the respective 5 and 100-year release rates from both ponds, and what these rates are based upon. 6. Please discuss method(s) designed for excess storm water passage. Drainage/Grading & Erosion Control Plan Note: Red-lined comments have been placed on sheet C.1. Only one drainage, grading/erosion control plan with the required information should be submitted. 1. Please note the existing grade of West 49th Avenue. 2. Please note clearly on both detention ponds the elevation and limits of the 100-year storm volume. 3. Please provide and reference a typical cross-section detail for the proposed outlet from the 36-inch RCP. 4. Please provide sheet reference for all storm sewer structures that are to be detailed. 5. Please note the location and direction of flow from all roof drains for the proposed structure. 6. Please note detention pond numbers. 7. Please note all proposed surface types and typical grades throughout the site. 8. Please provide concise typical cross-section details for the east and north property lines to confirm acceptable vertical and horizontal grades to adjacent properties.. Joel Tompkins, P.E. R & R Engineers Page 3 9. Please include minimum rip-rap diameter ranges for all outlets. 10. Note sub-basin designation/information and legend. 11. Please note the location and elevation of City benchmarks or benchmarks referenced to the City. 12. Final plans will need engineer's stamp and signature. 13. Please include red-lined note regarding tracking maintenance for West 49th Avenue. Street Construction Drawings 1. Engineered plan and profile street construction drawings will need to be submitted for those public improvements that are now required to be constructed along entire the north property line of the West 49" Avenue frontage from the existing handicap ramp at Tabor Street. This requirement is based upon the terms of the executed Development Covenant dated March 28, 1994. For you information, I have included a copy of this document. Note especially item 4 of this document. Traffic Engineering Upon submittal of the requested street construction plans, a review will commence regarding traffic engineering issues. Any related questions can be addressed to Mr. Steve Nguyen, P.E. at 235-2862. Subdivision Plat The platting document for this property was recorded by the county on June 29, 1992 as Mountain Vista Retirement Village. Joel Tompkins, P.E. R & R Engineers Page 4 Application for Minor Dumping/Landfill Prior to the commencement of any onsite for Dumping/Landfill Permit, along with submitted for review and approval. For submittal in the second review package, provided. Permit grading, an Application fees due will need to be your information and a copy of this permit is Public Improvements Cost Estimate & Guarantee Prior to any construction commencing for the required public improvements within the Urban Street right-of-way, an itemized engineer's cost estimate will need to be submitted for review and approval. Upon acceptance of this estimate, a letter of credit, will need to be submitted for review and approval. Right-of-Way Construction Permit(s)/Licensing Prior to any construction of the public improvements, the necessary right-of-way construction permit(s) and respective licensing will need to be processed by the City. Please return all red-lined prints with the second submittal. If you have any ons, please contact me at 235-2868. Si erely/quest'G Geg udson, M.P.A. Development Review Engineer cc: Dave Kotecki, Sr. Project Engineer Steve Nguyen, Traffic Engineer John McGuire, City Surveyor Meredith Reckert, Sr. Planner File 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 The City of Telephone 303/ 237-6944 February 24, 1998 Wheat Ridge The Wheat Ridge Department of Community Development has received a request for approval of an amendment to a Planned Commercial Development final development plan at the property described below. Your response to the following questions and any comments on this proposal would be appreciated by March 13, 1998. No response from you by this date will constitute no objections or concerns regarding this proposal. CASE NO: WZ-98-6/Mountain Vista LOCATION: 4700 Tabor Street REQUESTED ACTION: Amendment to a Planned Commercial Development final development plan. PURPOSE: Construction of six independent living units. APPROXIMATE AREA: 5.46 acres. 1 Are public facilities or services provided by your agency adequate to serve this development? YES NO_ If "NO", please explain below. 2. Are service lines available to the development? YES_ NO_ If "NO", please explain below. 3. Do you have adequate capacities to service the development? YES NO If "NO", please explain below. 4. Can and will your agency service this proposed development subject to your rules and regulations? YES NO_ If "NO", please explain below. 5. Are there any concerns or problems you agency has identified which would or should affect approval of this request? /J //C( ckcc\ Please reply to: Meredith R'eckert Department of Planning & Development DISTRIBUTION- X Water District (Valley) X Sanitation District (Fruitdale) X Fire District (Arvada) Adjacent City X Public Service Co. X US West Communications State Lane Use Commission State Geological Survey Colorado Dept. Of Transportation Colorado Div. Of Wildlife Jeffco Health Department Jeffco Schools Jeffco Commissioners X TCI of Colorado X WHEAT RIDGE Post Office t-X -W TEAT RIDGE Police Department X WHEAT RIDGE Public Works Dept. X WHEAT RIDGE Park & Rec Commission X WHEAT RIDGE Forestry Division WHEAT RIDGE Building Division "The Carnation City" 1 MEMORANDUM TO Meredith Reckert Planning and Development FROM Deri Patt Police Department SUBJECT Case No: WZ-98-6/Mountain Vista DATE February 25, 1998 GtTY ()F WHOAT RIDGE D - . FEB 2 61998 t,a0 It pIAN~itiG & DEVELDE'iRENj I have reviewed the plans for the above listed site. I have the following recommendations: COVERED PARKING: The covered parking should be open on the sides. This will allow for natural observation through the parking and surrounding areas. A greater sense of security will occur when the residents and their guests can easily view what's around them. LANDSCAPE: The landscape on the existing property is appropriate. I am assuming that the additional duplexes will have similar landscaping. SITE: During construction, the property should be clearly posted with "No Trespassing" signs. This may help deter trespasses, and allow the Police Department to cite offenders with the crime along with any others offenses that may be committed by trespassers. From these plans, I have no further recommendations at this time. Revisions in the plans, may alter my recommendations. While my recommendations do not guarantee a crime-free environment, it has been experienced that application of the concept of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) will reduce the opportunity for crime to occur and will enhance the quality of life. Thank you. Deri 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CC 80215-6713 (303) 234-5900 City Admin. Fax # 234-5924 March 5, 1998 Police Dept. Fax # 235-2949 Mr. Joel Tompkins, P.E. R & R Engineers-Surveyors, Inc 10 Inverness Drive East, #229 Englewood, Colorado 80112 6Wheat 9Ridge Re: Mountain Vista Retirement Village, 4700 Tabor Street - First Review Comments of Amendment Letter to Final Drainage Study Dear Mr. Tompkins, I have completed the first review of the above referenced document for the Mountain Vista Retirement Village received on February 24, 1998, and have no comments at this time. In addition to this document, an erosion control plan will need to be submitted for each construction sites. In conjunction with this plan, I am including a copy of the Application for Minor Dumping/Landfill Permit which will need to be completed and re-submitted for each site along with the fees due. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 235- 2868. S'n erely 1J Greg fYnudson, M.P.A. Development Review Engineer cc: Dave Kotecki, Sr. Project Engineer Meredith Reckert, Sr. Planner File The City of CO RECYCLED PAPER 7500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Wheat Telephone 303/,237-6944 ENV ~ n n Rifdge 0 91996 February 24, 1998 PLANNINc_ & DEVELOPMENT The Wheat Ridge Department of Community Development has received a request for approval of an amendment to a Planned Commercial Development final development plan at the property described below. Your response to the following questions and any comments on this proposal would be appreciated by March 13, 1998. No response from you by this date will constitute no objections or concerns regarding this proposal. CASE NO: WZ-98-6/Mountain Vista LOCATION: 4700 Tabor Street REQUESTED ACTION: Amendment to a Planned Commercial Development final development plan. PURPOSE: Construction of six independent living units. APPROXIMATE AREA: 5.46 acres. 1. Are public facilities or services provided by your agency adequate to serve this development? YES x NO_ If "NO", please explain below. 2. Are service lines available to the development? YES X NO_ If "NO", please explain below. 3. Do you have adequate capacities to service the development? YES NO_, If "NO", please explain below. 4. Can and will your agency service this proposed development subject to your rules and regulations? YES l( NO_ If "NO", please explain below. 5. Are there any concerns or problems, you agency has identified which would or should affect approval of this request? PI.EA3c 5sE ATrAc"-z p Lz`rrrt Please reply to: Meredith Reckert - Department of Planting & Development DISTRIBUTION- X Water District (Valley) X Sanitation District (Fruitdale) X Fire District (Arvada) Adjacent City X Public Service Co. X US West Communications State Lane Use Commission State Geological Survey Colorado Dept. Of Transportation Colorado Div. Of Wildlife Jeffco Health Department Jeffco Schools Jeffco Commissioners X TCl of Colorado X WHEAT RIDGE Post Office X WHEAT RIDGE Police Department X WHEAT RIDGE Public Works Dept. X WHEAT RIDGE Park & Rec Commission X WHEAT RIDGE Forestry Division WHEAT RIDGE Building Division "The Carnation City" Arvada Fire Protection District FIRE MARSHALS' OFFICE P. O. Box 3-D ARVADA, COLORADO 80001 Telephone (303) 425-0850 - FAX (303) 422-4569 March 5, 1998 Ms. Meredith Reckert Department of Community Development City of Wheat Ridge 7500 W. 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO. 80034 RE: Mountain Vista Retirement Village Amended Final Development Plan. Dear Meredith, We have reviewed this site plan and have the following comments. 1. Fire protection is provided to this site by Station 2, 12195 W. 52nd Ave. and Station 6, 6503 Simms St. 2. A minimum of one additional fire hydrant will need to be provided at the new Southwest corner units. The existing fire hydrant placement will not meet current distribution standards based upon the Insurance Services Office Guide to Determining Fire Flow. 3. The existing water lines are not looped within the facility. The water lines are eight and six inch lines and should be looped to assure adequate fire flow and water supplies. Sincerely, Arvada Fire Protection District Steve Ie4 le Deputy Fire Marshal City of Wheat Ridge Planning and Development Department Memorandum TO: Greg Knudson FROM: /Meredith Reckert SUBJECT: Case Nos. WS-98-1 and WZ-98-6 DATE: March 2, 1998 The following is background information regarding the required review processes for the case numbers referenced above: 1. Case No. WS-98-1: This is a request which was originally submitted as Case No. WS- 96-2 as an application for approval of a six lot subdivision of property located on 2.5 acres of land at 11600 West 46th Avenue. The R-3 zoning was already in place and permits had been issued for two fourplexes on the north side of the property which have recently been completed. The subdivision and street dedication was required to allow the four additional buildings. This case was approved by Planning Commission but continued indefinitely at City council so the applicant could comply with a zoning condition placed on the property in 1980. The applicant has submitted a new application (Case No. WS-98-1) for approval of a platting of the entire 5 acres (11600 W. 46th Avenue and 11681 W. 44th Avenue) pursuant to City council direction. With the new submittal, the owners of the north portion (Jim and Dan Turgeon) are requesting four additional building lots, but the property on the south half (Fightmaster) is platted to reflect the three existing residences with no additional buildings proposed. Although we have sent the case out on referral, the applicant is in the process of collecting all the deeds. Once these have been submitted, I will forward them to you. Included with this memo is support information from the original case file : drainage study and a traffic impact report fort the Turgeon portion. 2. Case No. WZ-98-6: This is a request for approval of an amendment to the Mountain Vista Planned Commercial Development final development plan. The proposal is to allow for the construction of six additional duplex units and covered parking on the southern portion of the property. This property was previously platted in 1992 (see Mountain Vista Retirement Village Final Plat). If there is additional information needed, please let me know. 7500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Meat Telephone 303/.237-6944 February 24, 1998 Ridge The Wheat Ridge Department of Community Development has received a request for approval of an amendment to a Planned Commercial Development final development plan at the property described below. Your response to the following questions and any comments on this proposal would be appreciated by March 13, 1998. No response from you by this date will constitute no objections or concerns regarding this proposal. CASE NO: WZ-98-6/Mountain Vista LOCATION: 4700 Tabor Street REQUESTED ACTION: Amendment to a Planned Commercial Development final development plan. PURPOSE: Construction of six independent living units. APPROXIMATE AREA: 5.46 acres. 1. Are public facilities or services provided by your agency adequate to serve this development? YES NO. If "NO", please explain below. 2. Are service lines. available to the development? YES NO . If "NO", please explain below. 3. Do you have adequate capacities to service the development? YES NO . If "NO", please explain below. 4. Can and will your agency service this proposed development subject to your rules and regulations? YES NO . If "NO", please explain below. 5. Are there any concerns or problems you agency has identified which would or should affect approval of this request? Please reply to: Meredith Reckert Department of Planning & Development DISTRIBUTION: X Water District (Valley) X Sanitation District (Fruitdale) X Fire District (Arvada) Adjacent City X Public Service Co. X US West Communications State Lane Use Commission State Geological Survey Colorado Dept. Of Transportation Colorado Div. Of Wildlife Jeffco Health Department Jeffco Schools Jeffco Commissioners X TCI of Colorado X WHEAT RIDGE Post Office X WHEAT RIDGE Police Department X WHEAT RIDGE Public Works Dept. X WHEAT RIDGE Park & Rec Commission X WHEAT RIDGE Forestry Division WHEAT RIDGE Building Division "The Carnation City" THIS PROJECT PROPOSES THE CONSIRUCRON CF THREE WPLEXES (5X INDEPENDENT APARTMENTS) AND AS590AIED COVERED PARKING ON A 50 ALOE PROPERTY LOCATED ON ME NORTHEAST CORNER OF WEST ASST ANN AYFNUE AND TABOR STREET IN R2 Cltt OF MEAT POOL. THEY APARTMENTS WILL BE ARMITECTURALLY COWODARD AND OF HIGH NATTY. THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF ME PROPERTY ADAEENT TO AND COORDINATED 'M H ME EXISRNC MOUNTAIN META RETIREMENT COMI GENEROUS PERNMEIEN LANDSCAPING, WEN SPATE AND BUILDING $ETBACXS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED ON ALL SIDES C6 ME PROPERTY IN ORDER TO BUFFER ADJACENT PROPERDES AND to CREATE A QUALITY ENVIRONMENT ANN ME PROJECT ME PARKING AREAS HAW BEEN DESIGNED TO ALLOW FCR CLEAR CIRCULATION MMIN ME PROJECT, AS SELL AS A SEPARATION OF PEDESTRIAN AMC VEHICULAR MANN ME MATERIALS USED IN ME CONSMUCTIBIN OF MI5 FACILITY ALL BE CONSISTENT IN COLOR AND RANKS AM THE EMSTNC BUILDNGS ON ME PROPERTY FOR EXAMPLE: BRICK, AKYNI STONE AMID GLASS. THE SINE OF ME OIILOINGS SHALL REFLECT ME REBUTTAL USURY Or ME COMPLEX MAT HAS BEEN ESTABUSNED THROUGH FREWWS EMSTNG PHASES OF CCNSIRUCTON. ME ROOFS MLL BIfNO AM ME LINES OF ME BEING MOUNTAIN VISTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY. ME FINAL LAYOUT AND CPJENTAIION OF ME BURDING FWTPRWS SHALL BE RESIGNED) TO ALLOW FOR AND ENCOURAGE ME AND OF PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY INHERENT TO THIS TYPE OF RETIREMENT COMMUNITY llialill. LOT 4. MOUNT" VISTA RETIREMENT VILLAGE. CITY OF MEAT RIOC£, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE CL COLORADO ADE DATA. PERMITTED USES: ALL USES AtLOMD UNDER RECORDED FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. LOT A - INDEPENDENT APARTMENTS EXISIBUG PLAN aMMED PLAN PROPICATY AREA: SEE ACRES 5.46 ACRES BLINDING ANEA: ".800 SO. F, - 35S 89.176 SOFT. - 37R PARYJNG/DRIVC 62000 SD.FT. - 269 6),2]0 SOfY. - 28% LANDSCAPE AREA: W.C. SOFT - 399 61,3e0 SOFT. - X9 .1. Y Cf UNITS: ST 91 TOTAL / PARKING SPACES: .2 60 UNIFIED COMMON. RrITE . ME PROJECT OWNER, Ni HIM ASSOCIAMM CE THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS, SHALL PROVIDED UNIFIED CONTROL BY MAINTAINING A SEQE MANAGEMENT MRWpI-Wi THE DEWLCPMENT PROCESS. I. THE OTHERS W ME IRRIGABON DITCHES VARCX CROSS MI5 918 PRE: WAMBROWM DITCH COMPANY C/O NICK KILLER 431-OM 67M RALSTON ROAD ARVADA. COLORADO BOO02 2 THIS DISMOPMENI PI 15 AN AMENDMENT 10 ME PREVIOUS DEVELOPMENT PLAN RECORDED UNDER RECEPTION NUMBER 91 3. ME PROJECT IS HOT WPACIEB BYA FLOOD PLAN. 4. CUTAR AREA LIGHTS TO SE METAL HALDE LAMPS AS PER On COPE 5. ALL PROPOSED CONSTRUCTON TO COMMENCE IN SPRING. INEL 6. MOUNTAIN VISTA RETIREMENT VILLAGE IS ZONED M9 - PLANNED C Mi CEWLW'MENT. T MEANINGS ARE BASED ON ME EAST USE OF ME SWMEAST K OF SECTOR 17, BEARING NOOTIGOD'A ME SOUTHEAST CONNFR I% SECTION 12 IS A FOUND BRASS GP (LS 1312) SET IN A RANGE BOX. THE EAST N COMER OF SECTOR 19 IS A FOUND BRASS CAR (LS 13212) SET IN A RANGE BOX B. HIS DEVELOPMENT BAN "MMENT AFFECTS ONLY LOT 4 IK MWNTAIH VISTA RETIREMENT VILLAGE SUB,YNSCH All DEVELOPMENT WHIN LOTS 1, J. AND 5 OF MOUNTAIN VISTA RETREMENF VILAGE SU CORASON STAR Y CONSI9TAIIT AM ME PREVIOUS DEVELOPMENT RAN RECORDS) AT RECEPTION NO. 92027010. 9. TIM ARE NO PROPOSED SOTS ASSOCIATED AH TINS DEVELOPMENT. 10. ME MAST FABLMIES FIX ME PROPOSED UNITS ALL SE TREATED THE SAME WAY AS ME EASING UNIT'S THIS CONSISTS OF A CONCRETE SLAB MIR 5'-HY WALLS AROUND THE PERIMETER FOR SCREENING, W. 58TH U Z D W a W. 52ND GE RD TAT RID 0 0 p O 3 F- H SITE z J a Y VICINITY MAP N.T.S. Dff BELOW-SIGNED OWNER(S), W. LEGALLY DEMCNATEO AUNDS) THEREOF, DD HEREBY AGREE MAT ME PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED HEREON WILL BE CEWLWED AS A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT IN ACCORDANCE WM ME U3S, RESIRICHONS AND CONDITIONS WANED IN THIS PLAN. AND AS MAY OIHERIXSE BE REWIRED BY LAW NE FURTHER RECOGNIZE MAT THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN DOES NOT CREATE A VESTED PROPERTY MONT. VESTED PROPERTY RIGHTS MAY MY ARISE AM ACCRUE PURSUANT TO ME PROVISIONS OF SECTION 26-61 OF ARTICLE I CP THE CODE OF LAWS M THE CITY OF ARAT USE. ME PROPERTY IS BASED BY BAPTST HONE ASSOCATION OF ME ROCKY MOUNTAINS, INC.. A COLORADO CORPCR I. FLOYD H. xAHRSON V. ,ERRY L DICKEY PRESDERN CHIEF CAESURA OFEMER EY£CURVF SECRETARY STATE OF COLORADO 59 COUNTY OF JEFFERSON ME FOCUSING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME MIS _ DAY OF 199. AD., BY 8019 H. HARRISON JR, AS PRESIDENT EYECURW ORECTOR AND BY JFRRV L MONEY AS EXECURW SECRETARY BY BAPTIST HOME ASSOPAMXN OF ME ROCKY MOUNTAINS. INC AMEA MY HAND .9 MOAT SEAL MY COMMSAMI EXPIRES NOTARY WBLIC NOTE HOLDERS, (MORTGAGEES) 1. 1St BANK OF WHEAT Ri A COLORADO CORPORATION 2 AMERICAN BAPTIST EXTENSION CORPORATION, VALLEY FORM PENNSI I ROBERT B. TAILORL 00 HEREC Y CERTIFY MAT ME SURVEY CL ME BOUNDARY 0' LOT 1, MOUNTAIN VISTA RETIREMENT VILLAGE - HLING NO, I WAS MAX UNDER MY DIRECT REMNSE1UTY, SUPERVISION, AND NEOXING AND W ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE COLORADO STATUES. CURRENT REVISED ED OR, AS AMENDED. 128MI FxNpvALa WADSWWM DITCH COMPANY APPROVED MIS - BAY W 19_, BY ME ME MEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ORY Ctl11`1 fBRilCAlltl4 ATPHOWD M5 - _ DAY OF 19-.-, BY THE ME MEAT R9%£ Ott COUNCIL On SEAL RECEPTION NO. MIS DOCUMENT ACCEPTED FOR HUNG IN ME OFFICE OF ME COUNTY CLERK AND WOMAN OF JEFFERSON COUNTY AT 'OLDEN, C0.pRNq ➢N RE _ DAY OF -AD. I"_ IN ME MOO( PACE RECEPTION SFFERSON COUNTY GLENN AND RECORDER \ (72s>., Revisions w 340,'>1'015-mRVCYOBS INC. •10 nvernss 0,- Eaa OU* 220 E .Rd C.lP.. EOIQ k-mk ArchRoc a Engineers Planmm KDA, P.C. 1201 111 S1. Sidle 200 DENVER. CO. 00202 (PH) 303-296-8556 (FAX) 303-296-8555 VISTA VILLAGE INDEPENDENT LIVING WHEAT RIDGE, CO REV. 4-20-96 CITY COMMENTS FDP Brawn/CMa1u6 N} Nundmir reBT wpInmed K97003.00 b.uq Our BBr Drawing Numbs, t'=J0' 1 OF 4 MaM) JO-9B .7, MOUNTAIN VISTA RETIREMENT VILLAGE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. I i ;AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LOT 4, MOUNTAIN VISTA RETIREMENT VILLAGE N LOCATED IN SECTION 17 AND 20, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST, SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, STATE OF COLORADO N, / -/-ys2- LOTS \ 2BS NTAIN META RETIREM€NT-WCLAGE - J MIT H 7 84 I ol 30' 50. 90- 15. 0' / X69' '09' E ?53241 !II \ 3 \\i\rz i i N / toy \ 11f''Ln j , EY\5\\NN j l I L q J! t i / / J/' r €a 11 1 \ \ ~ / 'Y 6 q1 EXISTING -t I F, \ 1 \I r l~ i rC --{L~ `1`\i--\ ~1'~ da rte ` ~i EV"p H ~e~x/s Wo WHEAT RIDGE \ \ 1 \ M I / L_i \\11 £l. SUl[0/NC / l (OiryC S l'ii. INDUSTRIAL PARK -Lj \ V AVAI V< ' I I I~"I hN ~e'- (_,J / / / /l \ \ \ I I I I ^,-,.I s ADime r- r, / / / - if \ V AC\\I ( I ~ i ~ Il rJ ri / ,~j! ~ ~ I \ \ i LIII h°G L_-, 4~ Z/ / l lJrh 'Xw d, 4 / Y _ 7 c v ~ 1111 `I ~ i I ~ L I\ it \ 1 1 ( m .II BUILgNG I. J.,JfJ'~ / i.- 11£ _1i 1 1 Tr} 'i, I I \ - hAO2 LI t % i J I. FLAG NOTE A S 1 1 N 11' 1 Et I Al I -54x- O ASPHALT PANNG-TYPICAL 1 1' I / ~e LOT 4 t / !v I LI Iti 1 1 11 1 1I 1 I III hj Ll / r r [ L` /J 11 ® 5- CURB & GUTTER PER it I 1 o - CITY STANDARDS 1 11 1111 ZII 1 1 h 111 1 rl, 1\ L J / 6•LDftB &GDTIEA WISIDEWALK 1 1 1 I I { / ! ` /~r\ \I $ a ® PER CITY STANDARDS 5 1 I 1 i1 - ` 11 / lri l All y.,i'1' 11 , 1111 1 ' 1 JI 1 _ / jJl/ ~T^ FXiS /l / BU/SAN A, ` l / LI m REMOVE EXISTING CURB k 1 11 1111 I 1 1 111 1a 11 /--I[~I . , UX(QANC h~ Zil[ / BUk.QN \ Z I %l/1 lN~ l \ \l / II ® SIDEWALK 11 \ (rl h\f \I'-' ~1 Il -1 / VITD/"c G C(Ue M' /•.i / II I~ 1 l ~'1 1 1 / F/ ~I'` 7 ~'<L, OUS[ l - 1 1 ~I ® MATCH EXISTING CURB & GUTTER 1 1 C \ \ \ \ 1 R1 1 \ I~ C N r~,r' 1/ - a 1 JT J / L . J II SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS \ \ \ \ L^ \ / REMOVE E%ISITNC ASPHALT \ \ 1 \ \ J / I! ® NEW a' 9 Ewauc \ \ 11 \ - t y \ ~ EXISTNG N ® ftROCAIEDE%ISIIINC POWER POLE - 'it _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _-_-__BUIdLgNG VIII S 89-16'625' w\\ \ \ \ N\ \ \ \ \ Ews1wG oavF \ v ora I II EXISTING I BUILDING ~I LLTr___ T------ I ri T \ It • ` it II It II 19 II \ -rt JL 4 v N020.046•w \ .FFfiNB a , e oL 1\\ I ei - - ii ~S~ ` .x` rs ,r y twsnxc owss L-98.83' R=307.03' 8=N 4653'20' W uw}v. C=98.41' \ \ E \ ..a~ H ` I , ~~s __--R=588000' LEGEND I \ \ \ - ~1 435.64 _ 9 0 00'3626 .8741'44' T P a: C R.Ls. am, o IOUND 1/Y REBATE IN \ \ ~ _ 6=S 69'40'14' W SE -c 62.30' • iP9 NI DOX P.LS.d13212 • SANI SEINER MANHOLE r • EMI ALL. CAP LLEGUE • Srob1 DRAINAGE NAA.OLE v v FINE .RANT o PARWNG LIGHT n%RIRE i O~~ 0 ROVER me f ZT. LURE k GUTTER W/ R CHOR OLY iEANVALYE NO). SERER Uk {may WA GAS METER SANITARY. SEMEN LINE o PEDESTAL WATER LINE INLET OUT v SIGN TRf£ ` \ \ Fem. • WATER ME1FR 0 BU9fE9 \ r y T Revisions IUR H4CR4tlER&- VR1(M W- N glue ON JY 220 aoaiweaae o.aao eom ~DAr Archllede Englneen Pbnnen KIM P.C. 1201 I81N SL Suite 200 DENVER, CO. Si (PH) 303-298-8556 (EA%) 303-296-8555 VISTA VILLAGE INDEPENDENT LIVING WHEAT RIDGE, CO REV 4-20-98 CITY COMMENTS FDP Orom CbeebB Prof#ot Number RBT K97003.00 IRwW tar &4R Dr•winy NNmb•r 2 OF 4> bah"i 30-98 m PANT' LkST MOUNTAIN VISTA ~RETIREMENT VILLAGE elm MA{ 3 HARbHdLL A5N 2'2y' I \ I IxL 3 R+ReweL NClETLOGI4T 3-2y FEE : ` t4' ....,._a QEf LL'A SKU56 / / - x9F - 8 NORi/EfW &4V FORSiiMIA 5 G4. / / \ \ ~ . DA2 b DW/YS KOfE4N LR.AC pGd!_ 9CNmId JWIPER 5GN.. NOTES: \T-~ L dLL.D10TIM>DE9 L/NN AFEAS TO CE RE-EBidELISNED LOT 3 " o xEa L.uwL.uw ds~AS TO EE ~scV 2. lwe~rd?ED. %z MOUNTAIN VISTA RETIREMENT \AL AGE" y LAM TO M LEGEND seTso - i - - \ ExISTIIa DECIDIlW3:lREE Ta 2E E.C 0wlc / All CL z - nA ndC511dLL A5M - - - J =-r f-- _ I=w~°Ti Cdlw or°rLo-l ✓ ! ~ .ecu~mr \ RELOCATED TREE \ \ \ GG - 1 U.L- JI , ~ \ EASTRG CEGWQIS TREE TO EE \ \ \ \ / . \ > ~,i' \ i II ~ II/ Jrd / , /m ~c++mA E)08T$G TIVFE \ cryw i~ ~ 7S-~~ \ 1 rT.L._ i / i!% / % I 44 C f1 G 1 I /}V~~ - \ I'iP i-- ~\S'~ 1 I Ilf -~~'(J ~ / j7 ~ ~~C ~ 5 ) RfSA09ED DECIDUWBTF£E-. 47 _ i • apa FAOP08ED EVEFGREER.SNIdD9 \ \ i i'rC.l- iL~ \\\`ti1 EO whir cc ealerECna+/Exe JM rlaa=I i may) \ A\ \ / L_y~ydEF (COD / / / 1 -edWL i / / / F%RasED DECIDUafi a+FCla6 \ \ I Ir"P 1 sa`i \ \ \ I rl mo~RE:• 2091F1bC+dTKxl erOTEn ' \ \\1\' I \il! 1 I I) I 1 ~ I~ ' ; / ; ; , /7 ; w ~ -.rRmnscm FFEUI CaNGR¢TE WKiG1 \ \ \II\\ I I - Ji 111 I I.. ~~.Y.r;l DETAILS 11 11-P"j _,)11 i Tl I 01 1 -I•;I I 1 - / / i it I w LOT t, II p li{tl I I ill ' ; I,`~ `T :;~~C`, Jr~~ 4 d, i1 I Cry / / L 111 I r+}i m " i /TIIFI 11 1 ➢ \)l1 1 -.111 11 fl j i hn~~ //^i \ ~\Z ! 111 \\I 11\1 Z l '.E ~`1I\ I ~I I G: All P-1 1, \\1 1 \ V\\ / ~J 1. I J111 S 89°1625' w LDT4 -----i (rte I+ ' ww nro:A'm."`n.~ a 0.~6' _ ~ \ ~ ~ / nsnw OxIrE 1 l r- 11 I e.~+.~ e~n,~wan..n.eQ \ A\ / L oxm , \ (L \ \ I F _ - 20.04'\ \ su \L N 00'36W \ \ \\t~\ / \ \W I >RObx 9883' \ C~ e 6f 911Rr-- R= 7 39° ` / ~y \ ...mewr B=N 64653W W C-3 AP I \ _ \ 17T l mss' wwme 435.6 $ o' 30'. - 60• 9$' - _ smus PLANTING DETAIL o ..rte - IW AfJII: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Revisions A"DdaW% ln~o UR 0GJNZ u" 0flW0M me NMsW.fM seesO fbW ~ nen Arallfs bfs En KDA, P.C. 1201 leln s. sax. gas aEWER, co. $0202 (FX) 303-296-$556 (FAX) 303-296-6555 VISTA VIL AGE INDEPENDENT wNG WHEAT RIDGE, CO FDP LANDSCAPE PLAN 0n.n/cn.=xsa r0lecr Numb p App nvs,s K97000 Issued Iar file o , xumb - em. 2.p.90 g 8 3 A WQ 6~ -C Y s S ¢ UEg1 W 0 9 Wa S" ~ § Sw ag of 8° €R ai ~ xR ~ m 3 s °R §E a O V w Fq bU ~I Ua O VRF C~ N 3 F 2 CL, A ` > F y W C1 h zyQ W.Z. _~oj,`a+'......... W a ~NF ~EZ g0. E-4 W ~t Fax 44 ~IJ~C,, Tox FU a vy~ 2 ~ w4 F~ AJ r, ~R o q ~r ~y N ti U ti O p. g ~ b $ 3' ga l y I; ° - I €g I b b b y g < e 2 £ b ~ a ~ d g % ~ I _ ~ g a a y f i 6 8 35N3aN3d3CN1 O p 15 9NIldIN o ~ K In m 3 i Svl o as aanm 3 r ssg 5p ig@ hY .'1rz%8 ga $g Qua g3 ~ b9 a~~° 4 &ttx ~i ag g oa g @g d @p~ I? baba gf€eh T Q Y~ ~°ejo b ~Y d ~a~ fga ~a b Ax 5~ b AA a f e g E e ~Y h~ ~ t Br Y A A & 3 - e z sa d a iy ~g i 3a ~ ar n2' d~ ig g g Y g 3 g f 4~e ~ ~ ~na aaF € g s a 3 Y g gg 3s3 a „ (s a ea a b g e~ 03 4p~ Y ¢ i#pa ~3gugR f .a~5 F 5 a ac ~'~f b5 o W : a to z~k ? F2 >=a 3 y? p"~ a2 ax S A - V 6 i a s~E~i p 3 0 \V II ter - 1 r i / 1< r W I , , W ~ \ I III I III r, , h O h ~o~ ~fnq I w\ I ¢ cz r 1 / W2 2 2~a m 1 I ~ Y_7L ]C~II lr ti~ h~ Vy$ z" 1 ~ 1 L~~. s a , y ~s 0~ &k 3 Y •.Y Xs i3 b Y a ~c rte/ ~ i h~~ a@i \ \\alll~\1 Iv\L___ Z p WAN w~ \ n\nn I hW2 Fe= cn C Wq 4 S \ ` f \r \ \ \t s ? \ ° \ N OW \ ~ g. \ \ ue ' -+m~ tiff 1. m 'r~~ \ \ ~n ~ E-4 ~4 W qa ~ \*Ui \ 1? 4 ti il'li\ lil , III~11\ \\\\1~\\\~~ \ `4El U I I I I I~,t_ 1\ 11,\ \ \ ~r_ i C x tl AP3E 4 r Ir F > \fil l\\\ ~ 11 % iI 2 'z,~J 'Jt m T 1 2 L~ 1`~~\ °n$8sm b P z'~ I 1`,N a I 11 ~ , o s \I . ~ ''I 1111\. - 4 I ~ II'I l h~✓ 7 I l l u l 1;~, ` `v w~ I I o ~ 1 I . ~ III I~I I r f ' S $am~ 3 i z CgBgg p4 xv E la c W 1121 U ~I N ~ II ~ N s ~I iW ' tiff •1 % Z i i 8 a ~a gg ' ~ ~ 99 3dli f, X # e HER 161 LL a U W a J 0 O fh 0 0 n Y E 13 S s;8 y 9g~ ¢ ~Flilip . i Cg[E~~s y3~E~4eE e 1 lil ' ,~I I I~ I ~ l II' j 1 i 1 p m f bm>m Wxm.l 4a a~ Yal'(OY' = 30Y91IA 1/1SIA ' €Y ti o - 4 V7 A o _ Y jW 9m j O em _F _ F . J f J ~ Wn- Wa' F t ji T VII ~ O ' e I ` W • IS J W Z i ,J H -,'h if EIN CE ~rX SHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 EST - - of the fth P.M. )UNTY PF JEFFERSON, STAFF OIL COLORADO S 89'13'31" W 2647.40' - S(84f 04794) • ]oaa a PT. K - l _ i PT. A 8----- SEE NOTE 4104795) 'cMlvl "Y`+'1 ~ + 30' i il, D(88Q66974 '-3 _ _ _ 14-++`+} P(2-s0) i Fd. Bk. S. Pg. 37 IF F-IF i + + 1 + h { IF`- FF -F IF+ i+++ +++H ,-,4 +i+++ F'IF • I I~ {-h [O +t +++++1i-FH+++++-`++H H-H+++1,.}H++++}+h +4 IF IF IF /A W.S. 5402.9 a 1 + I% / +a++ i.D(1934-268 rn 1-i-+++++++i++i+i+ ++++i++{ h-,.+}}{: yam' I ++p +f + -F++++++++++{ IF H+++- + -+y++++H +I: + ly-F1}{-}-ham • , ,-.I t+i+i-hh'"+{-iy+++++y+ + H 28514 + y + 40+++,++i a IF M y. • +++++rlp(2-23A{i s.r Ol 023 +ii:'+~i++++++++ +++-r1 ++i-++H+i+{+-.H+ 12. H+H,++-r-+++++++++++ ++{-+++{-++y+h+++ Ol y+i+{++++++++ I • N + i+H+-F++++++H , + +y i+ 1 ++++++y+ +++{y++ O }}+Y i i-i-1-++H++ + {MN ++++N ,+9 i ai++i+'+i++ IF O1 IF 6 p +{*+1++ I +h++ + -+.~+f i + IF +i*r O~ I + „Y I W.S. 5471.] ++{+++'+{'y+'-'+ 01 n-{J 66 ++++++il +++HH HH l1 ~.2 HS+' , A -Y+++i++ O t-~ { 1 J-~ A I A\ I 'T'+-F-F 2 { H-+++y++h+r++Hy{%« y i+T fi' IF ++++{-1+++++ +5_++'+I I I++++H+rt++-{+y +i>. 4, +]1" 30' ' ++++++0 +s+ ++++I +-i++ii-Y+-,++i'~ ~v I{+ +1 N {1 , Him O 2{+{y++{1 + D(2385-529) IF ++is+il+++{+r+++i'+-+++1' + i++.y 1~ S 8'.0606 /4~ + -Fi. { M +++y. O ++i++++H+~ I I++H H+ 1 6~' 1 +'f r~ / -~y+ +s++-rH.++i i+l+++{.h}i.++'+k+ +++r++{+++H+ {+i - 7 i''`- ihi-H Y1 -+HH 1+y{ I+y +{++{+++++++++{+-F+i+ I+i+H - I~.. I - 4.,~ D(7907-657) c0 • H+ .+H+i HH h+{+yF++++++++++i++H+++++1+}}++. F-F +1++iy+{ii Fi i++h'' i-t +iH++'-F{i4i+++-Fh+++++Fi-hi+H+-r-++++-F}-N i Y ]95, {9 40 +i I'll 30' ' m f {+i + i + + +l+r i y' -+-++++++Y +i-+i++-+ +++++++{f I k++ _ ,}{++i-,+.+ Y+H ~2 i-H-H++}i+Y}+~++++++i_+FF+i}+- (177-32) 19 ]I OF , *-'++++*'+-1-++++H ++iy+iy-F,- ii,O++ti ++++++++i-Y1,+i+i i i}++ -j2 +{-i'++ li++ 145' _ i.. P 4 L, H-+-F++++~H' + 1{I Hi~{+j-~j.}l.{+++tH -4i y i-I i i \ - _ I i + (yi+ ++r++++{++ +i D(1 908-694 i-h+ii-Fr++I{-H+++i+i ++y-++++}}-Hy"FF{ +~+1-}+yl+iy+i+ -1+H+ ) 30. i. 4-++30-h++++++i++{+{+++++++++++++++h+++,..t-4+++++++{ ++++++j 4+++r+++ 2'' {y+ +++++i p66~+++++h+i+++++++++++i+1 4+i + ~ ' P(20-28) +++++r+-r+ 50 I.{2 s0 C12 M P(2-s0)+++i++'+-+i++{'-+i+'++++i~'i-++'**++++++i +++r++i-r+ +++'+'i-*+++t++~y 3"-c+++i +01,1 ++++++1~ g0 i+-{i-r++****+}++++-+{+++ I I 40, 363) - +++++++i{+}I C d' I++++H+{+i :'-'{i-{-i-h++{-Fr++++h++++++++++++F++++F } y ++++'P .r,+4++++ {++~i+,. ++-'.-,.-ry+}++++-'+++{+++++++'-1++++i"-++++ 1 +i P2-23A) F,~ i H-1+1,-;+++{ -1-r +,.}~r H+++i~+-';++yy+{y.+}}++rlr r {r;.+ +y-r}_+}}}}}+++++++i-+r++++Y++ V] ,x(81 0606 i4. tl0 I++++++++++,+H+i+++i++++"~s+++++++++-++i++++++++{,~.-++i-1-}h++H-* +i'-++++++~ +++r++Y D(1920-418 I-: 15.4' N I i-1-1-F++F++++Li-i+++i+F +H-++Hy-F+++i-F+++h y'T~"hT+H+Hi H+ +-H-F +++F+1+ q++++H+-+++++++++{-++i+`w+`*'h+++++++++-F++++++ ++-+i+i-r++++r i-i-++++i-+-+++-i'~'++H+i-H+++++++++h++i+. 904-a-465) ~+++-1++++++F ) I+}~++-F.Y}+i +h+-++-+ -999-368++++i+++++++r+i-+++++ +q-+{-i+++. +ii i++++}'++++}"'+++++++ -h (11++++i-H+++i+ D(1 { ++++++++++++ri. ++++++++h++-Fh ++++i-f-+++{++-,-+ ~ i j P(20-28) h-i-h+++-Y+++++++r{+++++++ +++++++f++++++++i-+++++~r**+*+-+++Y+++++++i-**~h++++H++l+{-+++H+++++++++++''+'+}++++++++++-H I , Q i q +++++++++++++-+++++++++++++{yy+yy+++-r+++++++r+l++r}}+++-+-++++r' +++++++r+++r D(2226-21 C ++++++i+++++ Y} **++`+++++r}'+'+i+++++++++ j. D(1897-363) ++t ! , U 3 I ++++++++++++++++++++h+++++++++++++++++i+++++++++i++++ +++i++++*++i+++++i++Y++++++++H++ ++t , + D 851013351 I ~ 4++++.}}{+iy++++++++++++-~H+i+{-F+- +i+*+-+Y+++++++r++-y~f~ ~+~~~I+++++i-tih+++ +++h++++++ + ' N I++++i+H+-i++++'-'-li+i~++++++1++++r+++++++r}}+}++{!}+,r .hF 1~~1~ A1~}+~h{+++ I i-h}f 1 D(1 895- ) I I - IF 3 2+}"~. D(1897- k + 51 F - 1' # (q +++++++++r+ h~~ co^ • I IA+++++-h{-+++i++{++iii-r+;-"0+-1-i---1-+-iy++{+'+'}'+++++++{+""'+s- 6 +++++++-r+1++++i+ ++-tr f 3'~~ a-+- 6 -+HkIF 8 h I I+++++++i+++-r++++++++++++i-{h++- a ++}}+h}i}}+++'++h++ 201++- 131 \ + P(17-32) C/) D(1052-524) , +~-++++++..++i-i++++++++++ 1 CJ G 21 ° o + l 31 + A W.S. (1895-41) P(20-28) k,*++++++i++"++++i+{++~+F ~++t~ 20' +i-+H+-t++++ +il 1 ) 3 ++I I IF D D(1897-367 -1 ++++++}+++H+}++++++ r +++{+i~-++++i +++i+++r++++++++++++ D(2085 - + p ~4r1 I k-"~-hi+i ++.++-r+{+ - IF i+++ +~+i.+Y++++++ 0) I N D(1244-577) n1-(.G-I 4,++++++''+hL ++i{ • .+i+++**+++#+++++r+r -H-7)+ ~+++ri- ~i 34.6' o CUGH (IXN 115(3) ,~16). i`i+++i-.{'+`+{iy-r~+,-+S+i++++-~y++++++i+++++{-h p++'+++irt+h' I N FF r I+t~++F++++'Y+r' i'i i -F-f F-F C ++++i+ fV I ++y +{++-++}+}}+}-F+ g39' ++++r+++ P(17-32) , H+++++ ~+~+i++++~ +++r+i+++++ O * I r + : -W 46TH-;y - ++-~F+i-+++++ ++++i ]9S0 CO '1 i r- +i+ I I + mI - - AVE-- _ 02 + + s!h +-I+i++1+++++h++ I r,+-r++++++++i ++H 1 ++-14+H{-+++++++++-h+'+{: OKD(1 %9- -75) }i++ f ++++H+Hi++++++++i++++++F +H +i-i-+++i +.+F+"I 1 ++i-F+Hh ~ ++++i-+++++++~+}-h~}+y-hh 1 H+i+++++ ++'+I , fiT++{+r+++ ++++++++++++++Fh+++,+++++ N r'i R6S(V16-5-6.3) +++++r 1h++}i+++i i++1++1+H+i+i++i+}++i++~•++++' W I + -t + h -H+++++ +++{+i co F +++++h+++++++'+++++}+ I fr++++ ++++F+i + if +i + co i+{ N++ +1l wit ' +i+++{ ],oz sFr; 1 32 i+++ O pv.c. 120 +I la r~+ ~ - +I ~ ri, 14 ii 3 i f d &)D' fSK S > Y~ O 6 f(eG W: 880.2.2366 B-ff r /V 3f~ jaj, 2Tir 4 SKf~'+~+E- e/f c ocetaoco .530. ?D MOUNTAIN VISTA RETIREMENT VILLAGE-OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REG. NO. .9SV,7PN2J666 AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE DATE 3-8-AR BEING A PORTION OF LEES' SUBDIVISION IN THE NE V4 OF SECTION 20 AND THESE 1/40F SECTION 17 TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON STATE OF COLORADO - - CHARACTER STATEMENT THIS PROJECT PROPOSES THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NIGH QUALITY, ARCHITECTUR- ALLY COORDINATED, ELDERLY CAPE FACILITY ON A 15 MAE'PROPERTY LOCATED CN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WEST 49TH AVENUE AM TMOR STREET IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE. THE MAJOR ITT Of THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS LOCATED ON THE NORTHERN NALf OF THE PROPERTY ADJACENT TOMDCOOROINATED WITH THE EXISTING MOUNTAIN VISTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY. GENEROUS PERIMETER LANDSCAPING, OPEN SPACE, AND BUILDING SETBACKS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED ON ALL SIDES OF THE PROPERTY IM ORDER TO BUFFER ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND TO CREATE A QUALITY FMVIROM ENT WITHIN THE PROJECT. THE OR IVES ML PARKING NAVE SEEN DESIGNED TO ALLOW FOR CLEM CIRCULATION WITHIN THE PROJECT, AS WELL AS A SEPARATION Of PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR TRAFFIC. THE MATERIALS USED IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS FACILITY WILL BE CONSISTENT IN COLOR AND TEXTURE WITH THE EXISTING BUILDINGS ON THE PROPERTY. FOR EXMVLE: ERIC[, WJOD, STONE AM GLASS. THE STYLE Of THE BUILDINGS SHALL REFLECT THE ^AESI OENTIAL^ QUALITY OF THE COMPLEX THAT HAS SEEN ESTABLISHED THADOGH PREVIOUS EXISTING PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. THE ROOFS WILL SEEM WITH THE LINES OF THE EXISTING MAINTAIN VISTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY. THE FINAL LAYOUT AND ORIENTATION OF THE WILDING MOTMINTS SMALL BE DESIGNED TO ALLOW FDA IWp ENCOURAGE THE [IM Of PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY INHERENT TO THIS TYPE OF RETIREMENT CONFORMITY. XI LOMME SEES: NURSING HIRE CONGREGATE CARE FACILITY ASSISTED LIVING CARE FACILITY ELDERLY 0.4.1114AMILY HOUSING MY DART CONIM ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES MEPAi1M CLINK ANCILLARY STOWAGE O MAINENIIQ FDA IW1 BE SHE ABOVE PRJVIOD THE WE ISTOIAGE ON MIWENAM-EI IS CONAIHED NIOIN A FILLY ENCLOSED STIMEIRRE. MOUNTAIN VISTA - RETIREMENT VILLAGE LAXENONT II I ( J.,l. I C H V 0 L A S I CENTER CENTEP N I C N A S I _UA GARDEN I 5I.U B. VICINITY MAP SCALE 1"- 500' APPROVALS' /,.J//Pr I I Y R <E N f' T G- PIMNIM INISf 1034 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MAYOR'S CERTIFICATE: - THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO, BY NOTION Of ITS CITY COUNCIL, DID ON THIS DAY OF 1937, ADOPT AM MRRD WITHIN FLAT MO DEVELOPMENT PLAN MD ACCEPT THE OED (CATIONS HEREON NNE. D(w EAj\ ATTES ^ . / CITY CLEAR GCS EAL ORATOR u- RECOaofa•s cteT lFluiE: rM2EFyirM IANmta: B8a,2,d36 F ACCEPTED FOR FILING IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLEAR MD RECORDER OF JEFFERSON COUNTY AT GOLDEN, COLORADO, ON THIS y& DAY OF J7),,,AA, . 199f, AT e.'E#0'CLOC[ P M. 4d N n. JEiiEISON COUNTY CLEO RX MO RECONOE4 BY• m J;(-.(.ce J CHMIT ALE.[ MOTES: S. 519-INCH E JIM PIN WITH CM STAMPED 411 RECOVERED AT MINT SHIN VMS: 51E-INCH S TRW PIN WITH CM STAFFED 14131 SET AT MINT 99ENTMS: 1 1 FLAT MASS WASHER STAMPED 419 RECOVERED AT EACH MINT SHOWN TMS: -1 N. BEMINGS, AS SHOWN, ME BASED M THE ASSUMPTION THAT THE EAST LINE Off THE SOUTHEAST ME-QUMTER OF SECTION 17 BENS S.0`16•E0"E. 5. TOPOGUEMY PROVIDED BY MERRIC[ AND CMPANY, ENGINEERS AM ARCHITECTS, IN JULY ISIS. AND 12 BASED M A RAILROAD SPIRE IN A PARR ROLE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 22 OF LEE'S SVRDIVISM, ELEVATION SYS).40'. TO CONVERT TO CITY Of MEAT RIDGE OMAN ADD 0.19' TO THE ELEVATION SNOMN. 6. THE OWNERS OF THE IRRIGATION DITCHES WHICH CROSS THIS SITE ME: JJCHEN DITCH COMPANY C/O WOUA HYLTM, SEC./TREAS. 6)58 TEMTSM MVADA, COLORADO $000) iWADLEY DITCH COMPANY C/O CITY OF MVADA to PETERS 9101 RALSTON AD. MVADR, COLORADO 10001 WADSWORTH DITCH COMPANY C/O MICE FELLER 67 Is RALSTON RD. MVADA4, COLORADO $0002 TN15 DEVELOPMENT PLAN REPLACES THE PREVIOUS DEVELOPMENT PLAN RECORDED ORDER RECEPTION FORMER 3510 129. PREPARED BY LANE ENGINEERING SERVICE,INC. 9500 W. 14 TH AVE.- LAKEW 00, COLORADO DESCRIPTION' THAT PORTION OF LOTS It, 19, 19, 21 AM OF LEE'S SUBDIVISION, CITY Of NEAT RIDGE, JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORADO, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT It, SAID CORNER BEING THE S EAli COAXER 0f SfG'IOI 20, TOWNSHIP ) SOUTH, RANGE 69 NST OF THE 6TH P.M., JEFFERSON COUNTY, MET COLORADO: THENCE S0`28.4 - W AN ASSUMED 6EMIMG, REAM THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 11. A DISTANCE OF 5540 FEET TO A MiIET OF (1Z MAY. LINE Of THAT TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1934 AT PAGE 270 OF THE JEFFERSON COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE WESTERLY KONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE THE FOLLOWING TOUR (R) COURSES AND DISTANCES: 1) WESTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, 3495E RADIUS IS $810.00 FEET, WHOSE CENTRAL MALE IS 0`55 25 (NOSE CHOW 0 BEMS S.69`40'IL'W. A DISTANCE OF 62.30 FEET) FOR M MC DISTANCE OF 62.30 FEET: 2) S.17`41'44%. A DISTANCE Of 506. t0 TEETS '!1"W. A DISTANCE OF 90.16 FEET TO A POINT M THE NORTH LIME Of SAID LOT 11: 4) 5.58`16•}5^W. ALOE TW MATH LINE OF SAID LOT It A DISTANCE OF 0.06 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THAT TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IM BOOR 1912 AT PAGE 796 OF THE JEFFERSON COUNTY RECORDS: THENCE N.0` 50.40'W. ALONG SAID EAST LINE A DISTANCE OF ISO.19 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG ME EAST LINE OF 1NAT TRACI DESCRIBED IN W. BANK 1912 AT FARE 196. N.16°32'35"W. A DISTANCE OF 275.70 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 20; THENCE N.D`IS'1}••Y. ALONG THE WEST LINES OF SAID LOTS 20, 21 AND A DISTANCE OF $74.67 FEET TO A MINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THAT TRACT Of LAM DESCRIBED IN BOIL 2129 AT PAGE 494 Of THE JEFFERSON COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE N.19°15'23^E. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTMCE OF 641.75 FEET TO A MINT ON THE EAST LINE Of SAID LOT 20j THENCE 5.0116100"E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAIO LOTS 21, 21. 20 AND 19 A DISTANCE Of 990.76 FEET TO THE MINT Of BEGINNING, CONTAINING 15.158 ACRES, BARE OR LESS. OWNER: BAPTIST NONE ASSOCIATION Of THE ROCAT MOUNTAINS 4790 TASOR ST. WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80031 LAND ONNFaswp: TK ENTIRE PROPERTY IS DMIED BY BAPTIST 14K ASSOCIATION Of THE ROCKY FOUNTAINS. STATEMENT OF ENTIED CONTROL: THE PROJECT OWNER, BAPTIST NOME ASSOCIATION OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS, SMALL PROVIDE EDIFIED CONTROL BT IAN NTA1NIM A SINGLE MMASENENT TMOUCX-Wl THE DEVELOPMENT PAIXESS. pwFl: BAPTIST MME ASSOCIATION OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS G9ka1~ 1 ~RLOYD MAM.SM JR. JF. L IO.n nn s[cLLTAIIY PRESIDENT/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR A, STATE OF COLORADO ) SS COUNTY OF JEFFERSON ) THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS .6tWDAY Of• 1984, A-D., Si 11010 M. WMAISM JR. AS PRESIDENT/EXECUTIVE DIRECT" AND BY JIAV L. DECOCT AS EKE TIVE SECRETARY OF BAPTIST MME ASSOCIATION 01 THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS. ol.` WITNESS MT NANO MD OFFICIAL SEAL. ` Mi1b 1'~:`: ~ MT CONGOO SSION EKPIPES 1-1LLA\ NOtMI IC m 4d avv(, ADDRESS 'C ~l UVLO•:~ 9n9n4 Q w (Yl NYAi CERTIFICATION 1, STEVEN D. LISTER, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY OF HCUNTAN VISTA RETIREMENT VILLAGE WAS MOE UNDER MY SUPERVISION, RESPONSIBILITY AM CHECKING MO ]O THE BEST OF MY KMVLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE COLORADO STATUTES, GDR0. ISED ADDITION, AS NEMEO. cn n 2, r 9 Ic__: REGISTERED LAM SURVEYOR j COLORADO M. 16837 v\ 134 •p!O iDi CC p SHEET I OF 3 PREPARED: JULY, 1981 PROJECT NO. 8 182 - I - 3 's $ 3 Y bM u 'r 1 1 -r I/ II -~1 - N A I - N 16.12'33 WOOK \5 _ _ 1 R 6~J I I ' r 1\ ~ l } ,J / N - \ Y e'\l K I ~ ~ t , 8 ^ - • ~ 1~/ / / I Xr, 1n ~ / I. 1 - , •V+X l~ ~ I \ L. ,36 EA~~M T `CY /!"A', " WADLFY ITC \ 9 PI ILI- 1 _I . \ y\' 1\ 11, ~ C. ~ I I U I ',,1 ~I ~_x~~~//'y~//~~ C~ PI 1 N ~c I a ? a 20 EASEMENT FOR J CHEM OITCr I O ~ ~ A' I \ I A ~ ~y,///) V f / a z 9 h „ R ' ; ; r7' Q n .r,/~ gn •I„ o ZIP I• ~ M I ~ I v ~ 1 A• 1 1'~ 8 / 1. l A w rv ./o 0 3y 1 -1 \ 11 I 1. I I /N r o Gel : y I I •FF -r\ g' . 1. 11 1 - 20 ENT S..3tl ~ Y ~ " - \ • x / /3 r. Ir /J/ G,i • ,.g 1 a b d ~ h ~ \,1 ',T~"~L,.%- ~x \ ~4 - ~~\i R 'JC ~n~ 1 _ ~ m i~ ~•1.3n 3 I ^/%Jo ~ li .i,) P ~j^ ~ \ \~1 h~\ 'I LLH azo X11 - \l a / I. \ - 'f I "moo\~~Y li I'1 /VO llwm C h~, ( 1\ \ \ YO/ 1 Cllr Y / Z J •n / I I- I Q 1 N N I I N O 1 •'I '11I R j r n G,~ 4\ 1 I I i`.~ \ /i'I Ili Z- ~'-S., ( m e l d j 72 "It 0. n I • UUj" II ~ I", I '1J I I• - ~ \'I ''_`-~,I o •,\t3/% I 1 ¢ INJ I~• \ V `l) / I, I 1 \ \ ~l ` Fo n_ _ . / - "1 I I O ~iI 1 R.Dw. -V./l v I ' ^ 30-3 0• '40•W ^ 80.16' 'd jllll /I' 36 16 W j ('I r;l I MOUNTAIN VISTA RETIREMENT VILLAGE-OUTLINE DElvELOPMENT PLAN ROOK as PAGE S7 REG. AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE DATE . 990p~a366 EAST 1/4 CORNER DATE SECTION IT-BRASS BEING A PORTION OF LEES' SUBDIVISION IN THE NE I/4 OF SECTION 20 AIJD THE SE 114 OF SECTION 17 TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CAP IN RANGE POINT 40 0 40 •o Ito - CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO BOX LS. 13212 EAST 1/4 CORN SCALE, 1 ab' U''ISr:B !V:. - j WHEAT ii iDGF. IiJDUS_:'f lvi. '~%.R I( SECTION 20-BR ANGE ==Z EAST LINE LOTS 22 THROUGH 19 EAST LINE E 1/4 SECTION IT Z ~YJED P I D LAND USE INDU$iRIAI SECTIORN IT INRR NS GE POINT IB0 2X2 CA BOX P IN LS. R 132 12 - tea _ - ! _ -E - VCC T~ + / \ A LAND ING L ? \ - rE 2.,\ \ 2638921, i _ ti v I R• 5600' S 69'40'14'W 62.3' s sz w s a. , _lz x r ^ • ~a\ TA O •1 STREET - - _ f` - - CENTER V4 CORNER ' FMl,;N -cN EN ,-i-N I' I D L ° I m SOUTH 1/4 CORNER SECTION IT-BRASS C CAP IN RANGE POINT BOX -L$ 13212 I LAND USE INOUST RIAL CO 1 > /-Kth1 I` SECTION IT-BRASS CAP IN RANGE POINT BOX L5. 13212 N m 1y I CENTER 114 CORNER SECTION 20-BRASS CAP IN RANGE 2 3 Q LAND USE INDUSTRIAL PREPARED By LANE ENGINEERING SERVICE,INC 9500 W $4 TH AVE - LAKEWOOD . COLORADO BOX LS. 13212 SHEET 2 OF 3 PREPARED JULY, 1987 PROJECT N'0. B 182 - 1 - 4 i . ND bM I I" - , - - 17/w-5L Uuv MOUNTAIN VISTA RETIREMENT VEILAGE - OUTINE DE',,fELOPMENT KAm AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT fJLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE BEING A PORTION OF LEES' SUBDIVISION N THE NE 114 OF SECTION 20 AND THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION-17 TOWNSW SOUTH RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE. COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO \ sKS. _ 2a i ATI± j MAINTENANCE SHED - 1 +4~ I Fi IS GI 5% • OPE DN •I 8318%SLOPED71y~ , \T"\ _ I I' , I \IS \ ;1 I IS\ L ERYIC ,~y,v ~ ~ I ~ r I: i i ~1 RS °j FIRST FLR S, CA I II ELEVI 5446 (I \ T N j, j I-1 I I ! (l PORTE COCHERE O \ • Ir - POND j PARKING 4-0 ` _ - 110 CARS - 4000 SF VE I I to ~ \ k4~5 _ r - -flllij II I I II r R WALKWAY LANDSCAPING BUFFS I II II III :~I 1~;- II / - r ASSISTED LIVING t ` / f I I • - I 1 I I I _ - Ip' a ° 1\ 1O 30 UNITS 1 d~2 B ROOMS 71 1- I , t I i v I I i - .w ADULT DAV CAR I I 1 I I GROUND FL CONGREGATE TH~ v W v ERAPY ROOMS HOUSING I 160 UNITS z il W i _ 2 ITT STUDIO'S. > I < I 1 < I„ 1 d 2 BEDROOMS ¢V~~, 1 w; u \ ~,%J ` 'Ivy 1 I,- . I L \L~f v 1 ~ I I I!'~I III ilI I 54C6 \ 1 W I II I I _I. I I Fx IqT 6. 11 J NURSING HOME EXPANSION - - I I i 1 I I 90 BEDS NURSING I I I 1 1 1 - HOME/VISITOR - 81 CARS i PARKING ` - L • \ ~I O ' - It -SERVICE A -!-.Ao / OCHERE n^ ' - - \ - - 'iI ICI ~ _ . l k \24 CAR I c \ LCLINIC y/ aooo SF ` \ i I 1 I I VISTX VILLAGE EXPANSION c I / lJ% J - JY 5 UNITS 2 STORY W/ GARAGES --a~- _ \ ON LOWER LEVEL A 6° \ TABOR STREET MOUNTAIN VISTA EXISTING NURSING HOME 90 BEDS • TINE mix OF LIVING WITS INDICATED ON IK Fla:l RME my SITE DATA BUILDING YYh TRW INL FIT NtlIUIEO W IRIS OL LINE OEVELp NI 11. mosSs S 611 BULt HT)HE RHEA fE, 160 Sf ~T~~` ° ASSISTED LIVING 30 UNITS 16 CARS d,UNIT BUILDING COVERAGE K$;, 000 SF '\J kil,a:d Qllld'IC AsSb :C'S IT app. 6F ADMWI6TRATIVE 19 CARS 1/]0081 ESISTINO 72YSO SF CL,NCL LDING AREA I~ CONGREGATE CARE ISO UNITS 120 CARS _16NNrt PROPOSED 54,740 BF CONGREGATE MUSING 104, 130 SF 180 SE05 NURSING NOME YO CANS 3/UNIT TOTAL COVERAGE 16],100 ST, 2].Y[ ASSISTED LIVING 25,"S SF ADMINISTRATIVE ♦,000 SF •OOOSF CLINIC 30 CARS 1120. SF _ PAYED AREA 1WA768F 20" VISTA VILLAGE EXPANSION JAOO SF ADVLT DAY CARE - - 'LANDSCAPE COVERAGE ]0X725 3, 401% TOTAL 172,855 Sf 265 CARS TOTAL TOTAL SITE AREA 660.300 SF EXISTING AREA 9. 955 5, 16.165 ACRES TOTAL 255,718 If \01 F.A.P. O BOOK 00.10 .SS PAGE ..5r8 REC. NO. 66 DATE VISTA VILLAGE EXISTING 41 UNITS Z J/ ORIGINAL RESIDENCE FOR STAFF HOUSING ONLY. IF REOVlREO TO BE REMOVED FOR FUTURE ROAD ALIGN- RENT, CITY To P/.T EWLI TION COST ONLY. 0 n m N O 0 /O • • TNI STRUCTURE WILL BE NE UPON APPROVAL OF A FINAL PLAN AND PLAY SHEET 3 OF 3 PREPARED: JULY, 1987 REVISED OCT. 11,1987 i TO SHEET 4 0 w w U7 R&R ENGINEW SVRVEra , INC, ROBERT B. TAYLOR, P.L.S. 10 INVERNESS DRIVE EAST, #229 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 PH 303.792.2846 FX X303.790.0734 .Zpo The City of Wheat ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS APPLICATION ~Ridare Department of Planning and Development 6 7500 West 29th Ave., Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Phone (303) 237-6944 O Applicant s~R- ILZA4t ress % is yy' Phone ff•A-- Owner ~~q~n~sucr~ggou4rtw Address .SZsSOrf Phon a3QB o-r'~iF~ ctcs!/l(a'~^cTfiTK.C~ 3:vc. ~~n}r9A; ~ ~voo2 Location of request Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request.) ❑ Change of zone or zone conditions Variance/Waiver Site development plan approval 8 Nonconforming use change Special use permit ❑ Flood plain special exception Conditional use permit Interpretation of code Temporary use/building permit Zone line modification H Minor subdivision Public Improvement Exception Subdivision Street vacation 8 Preliminary Miscellaneous plat Final Solid waste landfill/ ❑ See attached procedural guide mineral extraction permit for specific requirements. ❑ Other Detailed Description of request List all persons and companies who hold an interest in the described real property, as owner, mortgagee, lessee, optionee, etc. NAME ADDRESS PHONE ©r ~f+c , ~ , otllrRe SZ~r~ Vi~~a~r~# f~,er~Vo p co rwm ('4-3) ~{z~ s3B9 - sF K of LU - EC)- ~-R,'7.~ ~72rp PA o0 303 ~Z3 I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above, without whose consent the requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners must submit power-of-attorney from the owner which approved of this action on his be lf. Signature of Applicant Subscribed and sworn to me this day of 19 ~irAo2 Notary Public SEAL My commission expires J0-1( Q Date Received Receipt No. Case No./)2--9 U ~ a .a o u A o + P,a o ; Y 2 WA Y ® N,ti s; ,1 Y A Warm to d d p 7R .Q A O a M1" < J LL O U Q O u Y Y e^! 6 q CY E W E O J `'7 i~ C _ W t- C O Z O W .T ~ •O d; 1% ~ ° m U ~ O U Z :C J O t O W , W J U R-: m cA p R" m 41 C J U W N yi W ,-r un .i ¢ F; A fi F ~ Y to A O m G V N O L, y w G C w _ U O J V Y O a ri d m Z...-I U - O Q` O v a: W N L N y.0 S N tr ti N w < O _ r L w J v ti Q 0 = ^ J-( N 3 J C lU O .u p Y w 41 Z _ ' - . .C) 44l d O Y { O O T W F m 4> 'm A 5 ti C ` LL ¢ ` e Y O a J ~ ¢ F~ J W W W J C Ci Z W G. O +O ~ d 9 Y fq J O O 4_ tL } _ N V; ii, C1 ¢ i- i ~7 Z G:, S G - a L+ P-~ a Q fdL a ri 4i Y N J O li J w ~ N T _ID ° O iti ~ ! L] O Ir ¢ J-. > Vl -1 J~ J O l t- Y m 4 C W n _ y Y ~ C W u Vi V F ui O Q 4 Y ca W 4- 41 2J i ¢ N¢ r. W r W W a LI F F L' J Z LL W 19i m ' A p p r~ F- N J N T C F- O o w i- 7 w U U I._ C G ✓ 4 O qqq f-I a F Fn W S c S (D li i W Ll ` l 27 ry A Y a F- A 1 L L} O ° d Cl N t S ( C O C' 't} p O - fi b Pr m y C O J ul s O C ¢ ,0 C ` C+ O V N V u R' - lJ 1 C. 1 t G' H L{_ , . E Fi O W W U 1 N W G 0 d m _ 0 0 Y d O C L c 2 O¢ C W . m , - L .i t O^ v G ' ~ r( 't" T c l, i l ~ I r 1 n d J p N ¢ O L' - O u1 :-1 x7 Y rv N n O W 1- Z W U' _ O O L L T- , t i G I- C :.I 'C1 O m O w w m H O . u c ¢ ¢ ~ ° " a • w i ¢ m ' V] rl -j 0 W O w v o w ~ X, 0 W w lJ > > cwLL d P W cd Y vo ~ c wz v w. to tN I a ~g-• "O Q ~ , ¢ u ? U 'ne a o =7 A C ~ N F J v U, U J n G¢ b Y ' a d P' ¢ - ` H i t- t r ` p Y p . 5y W r-1 P rL o z zc r, c o t ,n O co n W G~ d co m H,.a zF- o° a L>,cu _ - oc,~ ?04~ Gi O Y D J O W ¢ S N „ ° :r w G O i LJ T ro is U] O Y i~ r-{ ,y7 a W N¢ C O^ N L ~ U W J F _ O O c U I F ¢ Y to " LIJ • ,L7 v Ry . F W W ` U V I- Q U - W O lJ ' - l l L l- i Y to r ~j r4 LYI' a m ` O W C b 1 o - j y . al E U O L A 'l- ti - . Z W t>_ W = e W W v. Ll - - W w- , l U d p -I , p § = W tl - T O = t U N.O r arty rf y., a b q~ p O O c7 v- I- r - u o PI G p N fi H L O Z c C - + LI N J E-i " - rL ^ a 1 P+ w N L_ C3 N 0 I ~Z o m w. `v , O " v p ti-~ Y Q ~„L O - O O O J ¢ N -.,-i . v I G t t, •r ~j a.J to .O ro pd ' . U O W Q N J G N C Li L v v u O ~ I O p W U V . i - qy N a P' U ' ~ N= M t, G t i N r G' ra p fri ° W In C Vi N O C iL . ` V ry 3 Ql o aa) A o o~ 4 r.. 6 VISTA VILLAGE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY, INC. ANNUAL RENTAL AGREEMENT This Agreement, made this day of '19 between and (Resident), (as though joint tenants with right of survivorship), as tenant, and VISTA VILLAGE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY, INC. (Vista Village) as landlord. 1. Parties. "Resident" is the individual or individuals first named above. "Landlord" is a nonprofit Colorado corporation which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Baptist Home Association of the Rocky Mountains. Further, the Baptist Home Association of the Rocky Mountains neither claims nor represents any affiliation or relationship such that any other organization is either legally or financially responsible for or obligated on the debts and obligations of Vista Village. 2. Description of Premises. Vista Village, in consideration of the rents to be paid and the terms and conditions of this Rental Agreement, does hereby rent to Resident, and Resident takes and holds as tenant of Vista Village, a leasehold interest in the following described premises in Jefferson County, State of Colorado: Vista Village Retirement Community, Building No. Unit No. , 4700 Tabor Street, Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033. 3. Term of Lease. Resident shall have and hold the above premises commencing at 12 o'clock noon on the day of 19_, for a term of one (1) year, expiring at 12 o'clock noon on the day of 19 provided that Resident pays the rents and performs the terms and conditions of this Lease. Option to Extend Lease. Resident shall have the option to extent this agreement subject to subparagraph 4 (c), below, by paying monthly fee in effect at the time. In the event Resident exercises this option, this agreement shall thereafter be deemed to be for a tern of month-to- month under the same terms and conditions as provided in this Agreement. 4. Rent. Resident agrees to pay the Association, as rent, the following sums. (a.) ENTRY FEE of Dollars, payment of which has been received and acknowledged separately. This Entry Fee shall be NONREFUNDABLE sixty days after the date of this contract. (b.) A MONTHLY RENTAL FEE shall be payable in advance of the first day of the month. As of the date of this Agreement the Monthly Rental Fee is (Dollars) ) per month. If this agreement does not commence on the first day of the month, the Monthly Rental Fee shall be prorated accordingly on a thirty- day basis, to the end of the first month. 3/95 (c.) Resident acknowledges that the Monthly Rental Fee may be changed by the Association from time to time in order to meet the costs of operation of the Vista Village Retirement Community, and hereby agrees to pay such Monthly Rental Fee as determined from time to time by Vista Village. (d.) A SECURITY DEPOSIT equal to the Monthly Rental Fee specified in subparagraph 4(b) above, payment of which is hereby received and acknowledged by the Association. Within sixty (60) days after the termination of this Rental Agreement, or surrender and acceptance of the Unit, whichever occurs last, Vista Village shall return the full Security Deposit to Resident, or shall return a portion of the Deposit and, in either event, shall provide Resident with a written statement of the exact reasons for retention of all or any part of the Deposit. 5. Terms and Conditions of Occupancy. Resident agrees as follows: (a.) Rules and Regulations. Resident shall abide by the rules and regulations for Vista Village as set forth in the Resident's Handbook, which may be amended from time to time by the Association. receipt of a copy of the Resident's Handbook is hereby acknowledged. (b.) Billings and Charges. The Monthly Rental Fee is due on the first day of the month. In the event Resident fails to pay the Monthly Rental Fee during the month in which it is due without the prior approval of the Association, Resident agrees to pay to the Association a late fee of five dollars ($5.00) for each late payment. This provision is not a waiver of the Association's right under paragraph 8 for nonpayment of rent. (c.) Residential Use. The premises shall be occupied solely by Resident and only as a private residence for an adult family, except that visits by friends and relatives of Resident for a period not to exceed forty-five (45) days shall be permitted, provided Resident shall also be occupying the premises during such visits. Visits which will exceed forty-five (45) days shall require the prior written approval of the Association. Persons visiting Resident shall not be eligible to receive any benefit to which Resident may be entitled and which are furnished by the Association. Voluntary participation by visitors in social activities shall be permitted unless such activities are expressly limited to residents. (d.) Cleanliness. Resident shall keep the premises, including installed appliances, in a good, clean and sanitary condition and appearance. (e.) Return of Premises. Resident must surrender the premises at the expiration or termination of this Lease in as good condition as at commencement of this lease, except for ordinary wear and tear. (f.) Governmental Regulations. Resident shall neither use nor permit any use of the 3/95 2 premises in violation of any law or regulation of the United States, the State of Colorado, or the ordinances of Wheat Ridge, Colorado. (g.) Locks. Resident shall not install additional locks nor change any existing locks on the premises without the prior written permission of the Association. (h.) Entry. Resident shall permit entry to the premises by the Association, or its agents, at reasonable times for purposes of inspection, repairs and showing the premises to prospective residents. (i.) Insurance Hazards. Resident shall not conduct or permit the conduct of any activity on the premises which will terminate, or increase the premium of, any insurance policy concerning the premises. 0.) Indemnification. Resident shall indemnify and hold the Association harmless from any claims, including reasonable attorneys' fees related to such claims, resulting from acts or omissions of Resident, his licensees, invitees or guests for damage or injury to property or persons, or the death of any person, while in or about the premises, or upon the common areas of the Village. (k.) Utility Services. In the event of extra-ordinary use or waste of the utility service provided to Resident by the Association, Resident shall promptly pay any statement of such use or waste in excess of customary amounts. Resident agrees that the Association shall not be liable for damages for failure to furnish utilities or services owing to strikes, breakage of equipment, failure of source of supply, acts of God, force majeure, or by any act or cause beyond the control of the Association, nor shall it be required to refund any portion of the rent during any period of unavailability. (1.) Telephone Service. Resident shall be responsible for promptly paying his own telephone service and installation fees. (m.) Signs• Resident may not post any sign without the prior written consent of Vista Village. (n.) Subordination. Resident agrees to subordinate this Lease to any mortgage liens or deeds of trust upon written request of Vista Village. (o.) Mutual Enjoyment and Use. Resident shall not commit, or permit or suffer, any objectionable or disorderly conduct, noise, odor or nuisance on the premises or the common areas of the Village which is a result of the act of omission of Resident, his licensees, invitees or guests, and which activity may disturb or interfere with the rights, comforts, convenience or quiet enjoyment of the other residents of the Vista Village Retirement Community. 3/95 (p.) Pets. Resident shall not keep any pets, animals, birds, or reptiles upon or near the premises without the prior written consent of Vista Village. (q.) No Subletting or Assignment. Except as provided in paragraph 4 concerning the Assignment of Refund Due, Resident shall neither sublet nor assign his rights under this lease without the prior written approval of Vista Village. (r.) Insurance. Resident acknowledges that Vista Village is not obligated to purchase any policy of insurance against loss or damage to Resident's personal property in or about the premises or common areas, and that Resident is solely responsible for any such loss or damage. (s.) Alterations by Resident. No alteration to the premises shall be made by Resident without the prior written consent of Vista Village. If Vista Village gives its consent, Resident shall be responsible for completing and paying for such alterations in a timely manner, and Resident expressly agrees to pay to Vista Village, initially and from time to time, any special charge or assessment reasonably related to the alterations, in such amount and frequency as determined in the sole discretion of Vista Village. In the event of such alteration is to be made by a person other than Vista Village, Resident hereby agrees to indemnify and hold Vista Village harmless from any claims for sums due to such person arising out of the alterations, and Resident further agrees to keep the premises free of any mechanics or material men's lien related to the alterations. 6. Vista Village agrees as follows: (a.) Utilities. Subject to the provisions of paragraph 5.k., the association shall provide, in customary amounts, water, electric, and sewage utility services, and heating in the appropriate season, at the expense of Vista Village. (b.) Maintenance. Vista Village shall maintain and repair the premises, the appliances installed by Vista Village, and the common areas within the Vista Village Retirement Community in reasonable condition, ordinary wear and tear excepted; but, nothing herein shall prevent the Association from altering or abolishing such common areas as deemed appropriate in the sole opinion of Vista Village. (c.) Quite Enjament. Vista Village shall respect and enforce Resident's right to quiet enjoyment of the premises against any unreasonable activity of the Association or other resident's. 7. Damages. Resident agrees to reimburse Vista Village for any damages to Resident's unit or building, or any common areas of Vista Village, caused by Residents, his guests, licensees or invitees. Resident further agrees to promptly reimburse Vista Village for such damages according to any statement of damages presented by Vista Village. It is agreed by Resident that any failure to pay such statement in either the amount stated or by the date specified shall 3/95 4 constitute a default by Resident under paragraph 9. 8. Default. Resident agrees to abide strictly by all the terms and conditions of this Agreement and that any violation shall be deemed a material breach of this Lease. If Resident is late in the payment of any rent, charges or fees, or if Resident is in material breach of any of the terms or conditions contained in this Lease, such action shall constitute a default. If any default shall remain uncorrected for a period of ten (10) days after Vista Village has given the Resident written notice thereof, Vista Village may, at its option, without liability for trespass or for damages, enter into and upon the premises and declare the term of this Lease ended. Resident agrees to pay all damages caused by his default. 9. Termination of Rental Agreement. It is mutually agreed that this rental agreement shall terminate upon the occurrence of any of the following: (a.) Receipt by Vista Village of a written 30-day notice from the Resident, or anyone authorized to act in Resident's behalf, of Resident's intent to vacate and surrender the premises. Any such notice must be received by the first day of the month to be effective at the end of such month. (b.) Written notification to Resident of the decision of Vista Village that continued occupancy of the premises by Resident, or either Resident if there are joint tenants, constitutes, in the sole opinion of Vista Village, a dangerous or serious problem concerning the health, welfare and safety of Resident or other residents of Vista Village Retirement Community or adjoining facilities operated by the Association. Resident hereby agrees to vacate and surrender the premises on the dater specified in the notice, which date shall be no less than ten (10) days from date of the notification. (c.) Death of the Resident, or in the case of joint tenancy, upon the subsequent death of the surviving Resident. (d.) Substantial damage to the structure in which the premises are located, or the total or partial condemnation of such structure, which in the sole judgement of Vista Village renders the structure or premises either unfit or uneconomical for continued use and occupancy. (e.) Abandonment of the premises by Resident. (f.) At the sole election of Vista Village, upon Resident's failure to cure any default as set forth in paragraph 9. 10. Non-Waiver. Except as otherwise agreed by Vista Village, any waiver by Vista Village of a breach by Resident of any term or condition of this rental agreement or failure to pay rent shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term or condition. 3/95 11. Vista Village's Right Cumulative. Except where inconsistent with or contrary to any provision of this rental agreement, no right or remedy of the Association is intended to be exclusive of any other right or remedy available to Vista Village. 12. Attorneys' Fees. Reasonable attorneys' fees and other expenses incurred by Vista Village either by reason of Resident's default or in obtaining compliance with any term or condition of this rental agreement, shall be additional sums to be paid by Resident, upon demand. 13. Successors in Interest. This rental agreement and all its conditions and terms are binding upon and shall be for the benefit of the successor and assigns of Vista Village and Resident. (a.) In the event ownership of the Vista Village Retirement Community is transferred from the Association to another owner in due course, Resident agrees, upon request, to execute a new rental agreement with the new owner, on terms and conditions not less favorable to Resident than those contained in this Lease. (b.) Notices. Vista Village may give all notices to Resident by depositing such notice in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, addressed to Resident at the premises hereby rented. Resident may give all notices in the same manner addressed to Vista Village Retirement Community, Inc., 4800 Tabor Street, Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033. 15. Terms Used. Throughout this rental agreement the singular shall include the plural, and the plural shall include the singular, and the masculine gender shall include the feminine or neuter, as the context shall indicate or require. 16. Entire Agreement. This rental agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Association and Resident, and no amendment or modification of this Lease shall be effective unless set forth in a written memorandum signed by both Vista Village and Resident. 17. Acknowledgment. Resident acknowledges that he has read and understands the terms and conditions of this rental agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have set their hands and seals the day and year first written above. LANDLORD: BAPTIST HOME ASSOCIATION OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS By 3/95 6 TENANT: Resident Resident 3/95 s 0 ro o Q~ ~ O U o z y O o z o Q N W V O o Y V O o ~ ~ 0 Z U H 0 b ~ ~ F o W ¢ ro FBI ~ U m z ~-i 0 a O V y ti 0 U ro w m ro V tt1 y m x y N 4 >1 U ti .Li O ro z 0 P, a 0 ro m -o O U N P' U tlO C 0 y ro 0 U F d y O z a 0 z x O O 0.1 O z z O a W U m 0 Ul W W 0 y 0 0 N 0 1 ro 0 x ro m ro m N 0 m x H A d 0 N ro U] ro 0 0 0 U 0 Y m a) N 0 0 L~ zu T ~'1 T CAI 0 F A Cl) xi d w ryW " ~ FY ~ ! M A 1Q ~ a t~~ j~I ~ tl ~ C o FU ~ U A W U ~ a F A y$y~ 43 is N w a~ ti F 3 s' u r~ ti U r~>c E MM i W o a tv } F xo>- s~ o o CCC~33 c r 'n o = 7 Z ~ v \ > 0 O y a ® ti 9 a o < w a H U7 v G 19. kd SE IZ ~~11 Z ~ ~ tr ~ Z I a RG0 4 a m a 0 O M1. p y ~ 1 V] C7 pG m a1 O O CA m C i poGC t ayi a~ G C3 of •a m w ¢ o-a 4a.~ t a U O a N' m w 7. d yF~ ¢~p~py ' C a HH c~tc o z 3¢ ~F oa°i' sw~a°•~ pq (1Z C h m c 0 m Y 3 Y m m ° m w n 4J O V m a y 4 g + • C ' V m V Sr • W 3 m a S U j f, # w d s a O C O 1. Jw m ~ m 4j 0 Y C L @ + v 4 ° mm m m a s m o 7i o ° u m v . + ~ y c ~ + . p , g U O 0 a u d C CO S i G O E 02 ~ i- k 0 . } Q= Y 9 r1 F 4 U 43 Y C V O M • ~ w G L ` d m • e . i . ~ a 43 ,4 4A d 02 • 4" O n O 4L y. C • O C • d v t 42 n o g' G D 2 S. m N 0 y e m G O. A C b d ~ h .f ~ m V _ ~ • d .C p t ~ O d ~ N U m 4 q - p. d m O A z • • d m Y P O ~ m .-t y ~ d O O m M Y U Y O w ,4 a g 49 V S • • • ~ Yy Y ' • '1 .a p ~i1 tl 40 w - M ~ 0. 7 a+ p CC p a► gg a w o iG C ri tai K J 3 Z S a 5 o ~°q3 W d V f~ O RYA W rSlI m m i n ro m m m m ~ m ~ m m y' _ A~ O 0. m S. O 6 G m N O 5 IN M !m. a L it V q~ .1 to O d 7 O D 4a b M / is F C 1". b C O 4~ 'O a~ 'ro e o ea o u N 4D %0 4i .t ® H b tit 10 O i~ 3 O Ari .q M N tl M ,,0. d N .m! m .UL F ..Ga °2.~5 s n a m o rs v u o o H a E s S -0 m v J S O Q FA Y 0 {1 ~m1 0 1®o~ V F 7aa ri Q ® v '0y .4 0 0 42 V ygOpye r iao' i 07 7 P4 A O fQFyS P OW m b~ t 4 L O G m N N O 44. cy 81 P Q ¢ V o r 's", y~ dap ma a v m a m y Y y} 43 C b as G p t' ~i c ® 3 a m 44 44 ti o o ® ~i 90. .1a 6 ~1 of .1 m o 0 9w lei a N~ e s :s 9: o m m m m st - U ntl m\ M n N f0'. ,y, ~ C 'O O a ¢ 'ie p7 E$5 @p. ~y m J µ O a '00 m p ffi OG M [per Y m ® CO s> F C m k 45 A O O iyi3~ 6`s+ \ 43 m R + m m c N 0 Gf cry m O W O X p 1~ gsy q~~I[[{ 3.«,> pp tr P9 m m p~ 4q m Oar F1 ` 40 C En m n Oi eOf V2 O 16 R `7 6 4 E z O m I.1w.. OFt mu , ; ,p m m m Y w m ~ G N O M N Y O m 00 U .7 w. p m N w O . .n u a d m m y O N (1 d L •F ON N 3 4 o m U u C m P O y p m 0 u a 3 O d L T u w Q N G O- O 9 0 OG m w `0 u C O a n u m m 3 W C H . d+~ a m w v b L N~ d u+• - m O 3 00 y O u d d " 00 i N W W Y d w .O u M u s Y U f•1 w m m C a F d w L N N W W O d m J1 9 .1 @ o M a Cq m rYI N N F mum w M O Y . O 4 a Y M N m O A r i 6N.m-. oL U'O uLM .O . O aPO rOi .Py u'a0 c Ow O i s d a0 d • f. w u O P G F C d 00 u 0 O d o y =°a' N C L T w r+ G d v N Vl a7 W 9 w O d m u C 4 Y .O W w t N O 9 w v q W N m u Nl 2 u a ° m Y j G pp Y• a Y ¢ Yr. Mvn000 OOa d0W O 0u d d s^ m u04 .m+ •O m~ 00ya m v a 'INN uw O d d m m ` V M Y m W N N u eD Y ~ 5 00 m !M C 9 d u u G y. L O N G N . u N a a ~?Y N,S ycm o: :1 uC ^u OT OoM 'MU C V. a o Q u y 'r5 m p A L'•• .q.~ m m O w rl and M rs' E•.zv< N~ S.,.NN mum btu m m m ma aoa > > C G 0 w .mi Gj L w > m d w s W M m o y Y r O w~ F wG N y~ O M ~pj w p N O 10 . O 'O 'm m O O O a d •O d O 4 M W . O ti M Y W N a m m m C Y a Y • Y m L G W M d m ti u m W u m O C mC d m G m N u u 0 M. C d M S O b H m N b 4 G 4 i L w m 3m ~ u .w-~ m C+m+ mmm m y .~io O +i O 0. G O 3 d= 9 C M m @ F" ¢ On 4 Z 4 N N C a F .w•. d 0 m 3 _ u Y u Y W . 9 .0 N mm O m• v N O G m 4 Y u u • O 0 0 N d m m m mi6 W F m d d G O w Q u m N'OM 1.1 M..--11 O w a=. w., Q ~ q m • d 9 6 C m m m e Q 1 O 4 u.+ D OS d m M O d~ dM~ m Oi Qa6 ~ M d W Q. W M Z 5 V ..i Y O O a 4 W W ~ N F t 1 C1 L w m• L w m H m d C u u L u P 'J u N 'C y, w O N N Ti L O Y Y d O O G y n Y W 9 Y O G F '•,1 m u y• ~t~ GO b F .O ,-oi w w w~ A O u G CO' N a^0 O Fw G O 6 6M N y a O b 0 6 O 0 O d 0 O- Q M 4 u Y O y~ M V U.1A d m C Lw .r m ' L 0. p~ Y M m 0 N N Z u m m m C G m N V .8 m w d m W dO m Z-L•'. M Y d W m 40 u m m O W O 3 M m A O N 4 N..C u O G N 4 m U m b m e Y C Q 9'to U d N d d N .O N C u m C O b N u 0. 4 0 0 0 w N N u m m m O yd m d S a mm jO m >m am Y M F O m MO F w N 1. L Y Y ?1 m Y u [y' •ji L•rj Y y- Y h Y M a O m -r M .%i U m u u F f'~ r u i. G O N M L O L m Q m w M a Y W w 1 Y ••a N 1'f .1 Yl .O n N t Y N u'O M e M w O ..~j w m M 4 y 0'O O m 9 W m II L ~ a 0 co co o a~ o o y OI- ~I. y0,, ~7r O N H w /1 w I..1 F ~ y O U O U FBI y Z o ~ w GLr o W o a d Cd 0 z o- Oo z A C) ° w a Z° 0 ro O a a 0 °o U m w O r O U v co O ~ co o 9 > ro ~ ~ b b rd m > ;C -u y €z N ° 00 c0 o ,o tf z a0i 'b ';t c o ti z u o U o m O 0 u d b ° G4 G o O F U F y U N <d 0 (D 'O Chi' d 00 U b o zU 1 "~^I 1 T ~ T N 0 x N ro ~ F A FTy o-~r A w x F W A W E-4 2 F ]z zw o~ FU 0 UA ww U m F A W pa F C t i r~y Al i ~Y 9 Z Yk a S z U A 0 0 LLl 1-4 00 m LO o~ z N H M~ I"1 W 0 O N a a m Cl) M O z a N N 0 z x 0 O w rn CN U N O oz r O O u ~ o a ° m W O U W Y Q i U -1y F z~ 0 m b e,•,1,e1111111P1If11/ z, 1 1 _p T ~ T y i ~ R 'eee a•• V.J • i O ~ 7 f/Iff111f111111 U o r N In r O ,4 E" Vr Q W ~ w A w x U d' F W A w w F ~F ~z z~ 0 FU O UA W NF ~ W W U F Q W O F a 4t?478 lRal sit jj. pia 9v ~y oil 1 1 , s1~ 3~ I I 1 :s y1j~~~# 3i~W r - ° Mpy m Y V N O M COO Y O 6 i7 Fa v y a ~W O m Y Y L W W M 7 . $oa sM: # Y M Y W all lt~ ° Asa ~~~;~~jgg 0 Y O file was idisiasiE, g g i r Y 5 st g gi ~a b a . a t s a gig M i a %NN f- a~ I CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT INVOICE FEE TYPE FEE CHARGE ACCOUNT NUMBER Application Submittal See Fee Schedule 41,OD, Co 01-550-01-551 Publications/Notices See Fee Schedule p~ 01-550-02-551 24" x 36" Blue Line $ 3.25 01-121-654 24" x 36" Mylar Copy $ 6.00 Single Zoning Map $ 2.00 Set of Zoning Maps $20.00 11" x 17" Color Map $ 2.00 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Comp. Plan Maps $ 2.00 02/18/98 10€28 AN cdh Comp. Plan Book w/Map $10.00 Dei~tist Home Assn. Fruitdale Valley Master Plan $ 2.50 RECEIPT NO.-C004865 ANOU FMSD ZONING REINDUR5EMENT 225.1 Subdivision Regulations $ 4.50 FMSD ZONING APPLICATION F 100.1 Zoning Ordinance $15.00 (does not include annual updates) PAYMENT RECEIVED ANOUI CK 10877 100.1 CK' 10911 225.1 Copies $.15/page TOTAL 325.! Copy of Meeting Tapes $25.00/tape Miscellaneous: 01-121-654 TOTAL COST: 3 5 ZUf`l~ Ze6n VT 50