Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
WZ-98-12
_ Marcie Emilv 9080 West 32 Avenue Wheat Ridge CO 80033 Julv 22, 1998 Sean McCartney Citv of Wheat Ridge 7500 West 29 Avenue Wheat Ridge CO 80215 Reference: WZ-98-12/Emily Dear Sean: This letter is to verifv the withdrawl from the Case No. and Name: WZ-98-12/Emily regarding the change of Zoning from R-2 to R-C, and an 18'6" front yard setback variance to the 50' front yard setback requirement. The Planning Commission hearing was held July 16, 1998. Thank you for vour consideration in the matter. Cordiallv, ~O)L,4 Marcie Emily 1. Zoning on the property is Planned Industrial Development. 2. A subdivision is required to allow for individual ownership of the existing buildings. 3. All requirements of the Subdivision Regulations have been met. Commissioner SNOW offered the following amendment: Condition No. 4: Language of all cross easements be approved by the City Attorney and recorded with Jefferson County. This amendment was accepted by Commissioners SHOCKLEY and GOKEY. The motion carried by a vote of 7-0, with Commissioner DUNN absent. Commissioner SNOW moved and Commissioner COLLINS seconded that the Planning Commission request the Public Works Department to review the drainage situation and apparent problems on Lots 1 and 2 and determine if the City is able to alleviate those problems. The motion carried 6-1 with Commissioner SHOCKLEY voting no and Commissioner DUNN absent. B. Case No. WZ-98-12. ' An application by Marcie Emily for approval of a zone change from R-2 to R-C to allow office or retail business for property located at 6410 West 44th Avenue was presented by Sean McCartney. Mr. McCartney reviewed the staff report and presented slides and overheads of the subject property. He entered the comprehensive plan, zoning ordinance, case file, packet materials and exhibits into the record which were accepted by Chair THOMPSON. In conclusion, he stated that it was staff s recommendation that the application be approved. Mr. McCartney stated that a neighborhood meeting was held on May 19, 1998 where Michael Constanten of 4335 Lamar Street expressed concern about parking and traffic on Lamar. Chair THOMPSON asked what would happen if the property were rezoned without a variance being granted. Mr. McCartney replied that the property would then become nonconforming. Marcie Emily - 9080 West 32nd Avenue Ms. Emily was sworn by Chair THOMPSON. She stated her purpose for purchasing the property was to operate her real estate business. She felt that traffic impact would be minimal because only 25% of her clientele visit the office. Since she would not be able to utilize the entire space, she would probably sublet to an insurance business or similar kind of business. Planning Commission Page 4 07/16/98 In response to questions from Commissioner GOKEY, Ms. Emily replied that she purchased the property at the end of March and that she planned to have an irrigation system to maintain the landscaping. In response to a question from Chair THOMPSON, Mr. McCartney explained that landscaping is to be completed upon issuance of a certificate of occupancy; however the City does permit escrows and time frames for completion of landscaping. Tom Reek 9605 West 49th Mr. Reek, architect for the applicant, was sworn by Chair THOMPSON. He addressed the transitional nature of the neighborhood noting that all residential properties along 44th Avenue between Harlan and Pierce have been rezoned for commercial use with the exception of Ms. Emily's property. He stated that Ms. Emily's plan to upgrade the property for commercial use would be an enhancement to the community because the property is presently in a state of distress. He felt there would be very little traffic impact on Lamar Street due to the nature of her business. In response to a question from Commissioner GOKEY, Mr. Reek stated that landscaping for the property would take five to six weeks. Commissioner BRINKMAN requested that the applicant install a monument sign rather than a pole sign. Mr. Reek commented that, due to the nature of Mr. Emily's business, a sign on the building would probably be sufficient. Kathy Ratcliff 4380 Lamar Ms. Ratcliff was sworn by Chair THOMPSON. She expressed concern about increased traffic in her neighborhood. In response to a request from Chair THOMPSON, Mr. McCartney provided Ms. Ratcliff with a copy of the allowed uses in RC and RC-1 zone districts. Chair THOMPSON asked if there were others present who wished to address this issue. There was no response. Commissioner SNOW asked what the procedure would be if two properties were combined. Mr. McCartney replied that if the property is rezoned RC and the uses are compatible, it would be an administrative process to approve a building permit on a combined plat. In response to a question from Commissioner GOKEY, Mr. McCartney stated that the applicant also owns the property directly south of the subject property. Planning Commission Page 5 07/16/98 Chair THOMPSON expressed concern regarding parking along residential streets which could result from this use. Mr. McCartney stated that the use is established as office use/retail and therefore requires five parking spaces, and that if Ms. Emily sold the property and someone else requested a use which would require more parking, a public hearing on a variance would be necessary. Commissioners SNOW and BRINKMAN expressed concern that the proposed use would not be compatible with the future land use plan in the area. Commissioner GOKEY commented that there are already five RC uses on the block. Chair THOMPSON expressed concern regarding RC uses that extend down a side street and asked staff to evaluate how far down commercial properties can encroach into a neighborhood. Commissioner GOKEY stated that he felt commercial would limit itself due to the fact that lack of access from a main thoroughfare is detrimental to a business. Mr. Recker addressed the Commission stating that the small size (approximately 1100 square feet of usable space) of the property is extremely restrictive, therefore limiting the uses, and that office space would be the only practical use for the property. Chair THOMPSON expressed her concern that if the property is sold, it could be combined with another property to accommodate a more intense use. Commissioner GOKEY agreed that if this lot were combined with the one behind it, there could possibly be amore intense retail use. Mr. McCartney stated that any use extending down the side street would have to be brought before the Planning Commission and City Council. Therefore, to regulate the depth would require approval of the Planning Commission and City Council. Chair THOMPSON expressed concern that precedents have already been set . It was moved by Commissioner SHOCKLEY and seconded by Commissioner BRINKMAN that Case No. WZ-98-12, a request for approval of rezoning from Residential-Two to Restricted Commercial for property located at 6410 West 44th Avenue, be approved for the following reasons: 1. It is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Parcels to either side are zoned Restricted-Commercial. 3. Minimal impacts are anticipated with the rezoning. 4. Approval of this request will allow for a positive redevelopment of this property With the following conditions: A six-foot screening fence be constructed between the proposed office building and the adjacent residential structure along the south property line. Planning Commission Page 6 07/16/98 2. The existing two-car garage is to be used for required on-site parking spaces only. No additional leasing space will be permitted within the garage area. Commissioner GOKEY offered the following amendment: Condition No. 3: All landscaping and irrigation features (to be consistent with the site plan document submitted to the Planning Commission) be completed at least sixty days after occupancy; and that, if this is not possible due to weather conditions, an escrow account be - established until the work can be completed. This amendment was acceptable, to Commissioners SHOCKLEY and BRINKMAN. Commissioner COLLINS offered the following amendment. Condition No. 4: That the fence be extended to Lamar Street in accordance with City codes and regulations. This amendment was acceptable to Commissioners SHOCKLEY and BRINKMAN. Commissioner SNOW stated that she would vote against the motion because, although she had no problem with the proposed use, the range of uses allowed in the RC District could have a considerable negative impact on the residential neighborhood adjacent to the south. Chair THOMPSON stated that she would vote against the motion for the same reasons stated by Commissioner SNOW and that she would prefer to see RC-1 zoning for this property. Commissioner COLLINS stated that he would vote against the motion because he preferred an RC-1 zoning for the protection of the neighborhood. The motion failed by a vote of 6-1 with Commissioner SHOCKLEY voting yes and Commissioner DUNN absent. Commissioner SNOW moved and Commissioner BRINKMAN seconded that Case No. WZ-98-12, a request for approval for rezoning from Residential-Two to Restricted- Commercial for property located at 6410 West 44th Avenue be DENIED for the following reasons: The range of uses allowed in the Restricted Commercial zone district could have a considerable negative impact on the adjacent residential neighborhood to the south. The motion carried by a vote of 7-0, with Commissioner DUNN absent. Commissioner SHOCKLEY expressed concern that the applicant has endured hardship because an RC-1 zoning was not recommended in the original application and suggested to .Planning Commission Page 7 07/16/98 the Commission members that if more restrictive zoning is desired along 44th Avenue, that such direction be given to staff. There was consensus of the Commission to declare a short recess to allow the applicant to consider possible RC-1 zoning. (Chair THOMPSON declared a recess at 10:10. The meeting was reconvened at 10:15 p.m.) Chair THOMPSON advised the applicant that she had the option of taking the case to City Council for appeal. Marcie Emily advised the Commission that, after reading the list of allowed uses in RC and RC-1 zoning, that she would be willing to apply for an RC-1 zoning. Commissioner SNOW moved and Commissioner SHOCKLEY seconded that the motion for denial of the request for Case No. WZ-98-12 be reconsidered. The motion carried by vote of 7-0, with Commissioner DUNN absent. Commissioner SNOW moved and Commissioner SHOCKLEY seconded that Case No. WZ- 98-12, a request for approval of a rezoning and a request for approval of a variance, be continued to August 6, 1998; that the applicant be allowed to amend her application to change the request from Restricted-Commercial zoning to Restricted-Commercial-One zoning; that no additional fee be charged; and that the property be properly posted and published in accordance with City regulations. The motion carried by vote of 7-0, with Commissioner DUNN absent. C. Case No. ZOA-98-05: An application by the City of Wheat Ridge for an amendment to Section 26-5. Definitions for the definitions of Net and Maximum Density within the Zoning portion of the Code of Laws (continued from July 2). This case was presented by Alan White. He recommended that the case be tabled for reasons outlined in the staff report. Commissioner SNOW stated that if someone should come to the City within the next two weeks to apply for a PRD, she would like to see the process for computing net density clearly outlined.. Commissioner SNOW moved and Commissioner SHOCK-LEY seconded that staff draft an ordinance to define net density to be included in all zone districts which specify a numerical density. The motion carried by a vote of 7-0, with Commissioner DUNN absent. Planning Commission Page 8 07/16/98 PUBLIC HEARING SPEAKERS' LIST Case No. Request: IA/ 2- - 98- /b1 AA,0416,17,10) Date: - 65" /11AAcr& Z-MILY JULY 16, 1998 foe .7- o y~ CHi4uGE fiean2 A- a to C 70 1}«~w 0 PF/GL - ~0~//U GJ OR 2~TsFl< 6051A)&55 S y'-'~ f) ~JsNUc Speaker ~~Name rr(( (please print) Address/Phone In Favor Opposed loan CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission DATE OF MEETING: July 16, 1998 DATE PREPARED: July 9, 1998 CASE NO. & NAME: WZ-98-12/ Emily CASE MANAGER: Sean McCartney ACTION REQUESTED: Change of Zoning from R-2 to R-C, and an 18'6" front yard setback variance to the 50' front yard setback requirement. LOCATION OF REQUEST: 6410 West 44`h Avenue NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT: Marcie Emily 9080 West 32nd Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER: Same APPROXIMATE AREA: PRESENT ZONING: PRESENT LAND USE: SURROUNDING ZONING: SURROUNDING LAND USE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE AREA: 9,150 square feet Residential-Two Single-family (vacant building) N_: Restricted Commercial and Restricted Commercial-One; S: Residential-Two, E: and W: Restricted-Commercial N:, W: and E: Office, Service and Church, and S: Single-family residential Neighborhood Commercial DATE PUBLISHED: June 26, 1998 DATE POSTED: July 2, 1998 DATED LEGAL NOTICES SENT: June 23, 1998 ENTER INTO RECORD: (X) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIAL (X) ZONING ORDINANCE O SLIDES SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS (X) EXHIBITS O OTHER JURISDICTION: The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. 6_/ I. REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a rezone from Residential-Two to Restricted- Commercial, and an 18'6" front yard setback variance to the 50' front yard setback requirement for a property located at 6410 West 44" Avenue. Approval of this request will allow for the continuation of an existing zone district (Restricted- Commercial) throughout a neighborhood that already consists of small professional offices. The property in question is approximately 9,150 square feet in lot area, and fronts both West 44`h Avenue (north) and Lamar Street (east). The applicant intends on using the existing 1,385 square foot structure as a small office building. The Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan delineates the area as Neighborhood Commercial land use, predominately for the parcels that abut West 44`h Avenue. The character of the neighborhood is primarily office professional along West 44`h Avenue, many of which have been conversions of single family residences. In addition to the rezone, the applicant is requesting approval of a 18'6" front yard setback variance to the 50' front yard setback requirement to allow re-use of the existing structure. The applicant is proposing to convert the existing residential structure into an office use and use the existing two-car garage as covered parking for herself and an employee. Because the property was originally designed to accommodate residential use, the existing building was built to comply with the residential development regulations. If approved, this property would be one of many properties within the immediate neighborhood that converted an existing residential structure into a commercial space. Separate motions will be required for each action. IL NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING A meeting for neighborhood input was held on May 19, 1998. The following persons were in attendance: Sean McCartney - City Staff Marcie Emily - applicant Michael Constanten - 4335 Lamar Street The following issues were discussed: Proposed use of the property Uses allowed in the R-C zone district - The area resident in attendance did not object to the rezoning as long as parking did not become a problem An area resident not present for the meeting was concerned about the possibility of traffic problems along Lamar Street III. AGENCY REFERRALS Arvada Fire Protection district can serve the property. . L/ Wheat Ridge Public Works Department has no comments at this time. No additional public improvements will be required. Wheat Ridge Police Department can serve. Wheat Ridge Water District can serve. Agencies contacted but not responding: Wheat Ridge Sanitation District, Public Service Company, U.S. West Communications, TCI, Wheat Ridge Building Division IV. REZONING CRITERIA Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a change in zoning (change of zoning conditions): That the change of zone is in conformance, or will bring the property into conformance, with the City of Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan goals, objectives and policies, comprehensive land use plan and other related policies or plans for the area. The existing Comprehensive Plan designates this property as Neighborhood Commercial which is defined as consisting of mainly service and convenience commercial development. The property is shown as Neighborhood Commercial on the Comprehensive Plan and will bring the property into conformance with the surrounding land use on the east and west. The R-C zone allows a variety of office and service uses, including ancillary residential uses. Staff concludes that the Restricted-Commercial zoning would be consistent with both the existing and proposed Comprehensive Plan designation. 2. That the proposed change of zone is compatible with the surrounding area and there will be minimal adverse impacts considering the benefits to be derived. Surrounding land use and zoning includes Restricted-Commercial on both the east and west with corresponding commercial uses. To the north of this property are various commercial uses located within the Restricted-Commercial One, Restricted-Commercial and Commercial-One zone districts. Approval of this request will allow for the continuation of an existing zone district. This property remains as one of only a handful of properties that are zoned Residential- Two along this stretch of West 44`s Avenue. 3. That there will be social, recreational, physical and/or economic benefits to the community derived by the change of zone. There could be economic benefits from the rezoning based on an increase in property taxes. 4. That adequate infrastructure/facilities are available to serve the type of uses allowed by the change of zone, or that the applicant will upgrade and provide such where they do not exist or are under capacity. All responding agencies are already serving the property. 5. That the proposed rezoning will not adversely affect public health, safety or welfare by creating excessive traffic congestion, creating drainage problems, or seriously reducing light and air to adjacent properties. Because the only changes proposed for this property are in additional parking and landscaping, there should be no impact on the amount of light and air to adjacent properties. Prior to paving, a grading permit will be required ensuring drainage problems are not created. There is adequate capacity in West 44th Avenue to accommodate future commercial land use. 6. That the property cannot reasonably be developed under the existing zoning conditions. The structure on the site is currently unoccupied and the existing zoning is Residential-Two. Under the current zone district, and being that the property is only 9,100 square feet in lot area, a single-family residence is the maximum use permitted on the site. That the zoning will not create an isolated or spot zone district unrelated to adjacent or nearby areas. Restricted-Commercial zone districts are located on the north, east and west of the property. Approval of this request will comply with both the existing adjacent zoning and Comprehensive Plan for this neighborhood. Therefore, spot zoning is not an issue. 8. That there is a void in an area or community need that the change of zone will fill by providing for necessary services, products or facilities especially appropriate at the location, considering available alternatives. It is impossible for staff to ascertain whether the rezoning will fill a necessary service, product or facility. Staff does believe that approval of this request will allow for the property to come into compliance with the use and design of the surrounding properties. VI VARIANCE CRITERIA If the rezoning portion of this case is approved, the following variance must be considered for the applicant to comply with the development standards established in the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws. The applicant is requesting approval of a 18'6" front yard setback variance to the 50' front yard setback requirement to allow an existing residential structure to be used as a commercial building. Pursuant to Section 26-21 (17)(5) of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, structures along West 44"Avenue must retain a 50' front yard setback where the existing setback is only 31'6". Because the building is currently located outside of the visual site triangle, and the property will be designed so vehicles will not back out onto West 44`" Avenue, staff believes approval of this request will not negatively impact the public's health, safety and welfare. In accordance with Wheat Ridge Code of Laws Section 26-6 (D), before a variance is approved, the applicant shall show and Planning Commission shall find: 1. Can the property in question yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district i l~ in which it is located? No. Because the property was designed to accommodate a residential use, and the applicant is proposing to rezone to a commercial use, the front yard setback requirements will change. Therefore, if the variance request is denied, the applicant could not legally reuse the existing structure. 2. Is the plight of the owner due to unique circumstances? No. The plight of the owner is due to the proposal of re-using an existing residential structure.. 3. If the variation were granted, would it alter the essential character of the locality? No. There are other properties along West 44 h Avenue which have been converted from an existing residential structure into a commercial use. The applicant has designed the site plan to comply with the existing development regulations, as much as possible. The existing structure is similar in scale to other properties in the area. 4. Would the particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved result in a particular hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out? Yes. As previously stated, this property was originally developed to be used as a residential property. Because the commercial development regulations are more demanding, in terms of parking and landscaping, than that required for a residential use, the physical shape and layout of the property does create a hardship for conversion to a commercial use. 5. Would the conditions upon which the petition for a variation is based be applicable, generally, to the other property within the same zoning classification? Yes. In the immediate neighborhood, there are other residentially zoned properties abutting West 44`s Avenue that may request commercial rezonings in the future. 6. Is the purpose of the variation based exclusively upon a desire to make money out of the property Yes. The purpose of the variation is to allow the existing residential structure to remain on site and be converted to a commercial building. Redevelopment of such a small site would not be cost efficient. Has the alleged difficulty or hardship been created by any person presently having an interest in the property? Yes. The applicant, who has interest in the property, has created the hardship in that she is hoping to reuse an existing structure. I / _ G 8. Would the granting of the variations be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located? No. If approved, the applicant plans on allowing for parking within the existing two car garage and along the western property line (northwest corner), and the southern property line (southeast corner). Because of the proposed parking lot design, visiting automobiles will not have to back out of the parking lot onto the public street and therefore will not pose a threat to the public's welfare. 9. Would the proposed variation impair the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion in the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. No. Because the applicant is not proposing any structural additions to the existing building, approval of this request should not impair the adequate supply of light and air to the adjacent properties, nor should it increase the danger of fire. Also, due to the proposed layout of the parking lot, there should not be any increase in congestion in the public streets. 10. If it is found in criteria 8 and 9 above that granting of the variation would not be detrimental or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood, and it is also found that public health and safety, public facilities and surrounding property values would not be diminished or impaired, then would the granting of the variance result in a benefit or contribution to the neighborhood or the community as distinguished from an individual benefit on the part of the applicant, . or would granting of the variance result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities? Yes. Approval of this variance will allow for the redesign of a site which is currently underdeveloped, thereby positively improving the immediate surroundings. Therefore, approval of this variance should be a benefit and contribution to the neighborhood and community. V. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMAHNDATION Staff concludes that the proposed rezoning is consistent with the existing Comprehensive Plan and adjacent land use on the east and west. Staff further concludes that approval of this request would allow an upgrade in landscaping, paved surfaces and an ability to re-use an existing structure. With the following conditions: 1. A six foot screening fence be constructed between the proposed office building and the adjacent residential structure along the south property line. 2. The existing two-car garage is to be used for required on-site parking spaces only. No additional leasable space will be permitted within the garage area. Lo ~f VI. RECOMMENDED MOTIONS REZONING Option A: "I move that Case No.WZ-98-12, a request for approval of a rezoning from Residential-Two to Restricted-Commercial for property located at 6410 West 44th Avenue, be APPROVED for the following reasons: 3. It consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 4. Parcels to either side are zoned Restricted-Commercial. 5. Minimal impacts are anticipated with the rezoning. 6. Approval of this request will allow for a positive redevelopment of this property. With the following condition: 1. A six foot screening fence be constructed between the proposed office building and the adjacent residential structure along the south property line. 2. The existing two-car garage is to be used for required on-site parking spaces only. No additional leasable space will be permitted within the garage area." Option B: "I move that Case No.WZ-98-12, a request for approval of a rezoning from Residential-Two to Restricted-Commercial for property located at 6410 West 44th Avenue, be DENIED for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3." VARIANCE Option A: "I move that Case No. WZ-98-12, a request for approval of a 18'6" front yard setback variance to the 50' front yard setback requirement for property located at 6410 West 44th Avenue, be APPROVED for the following reasons: 1. The existing 1,385 square foot structure will be re-used and converted into a commercial building. 2. Approval of this request will not impair the adequate supply of light and air, nor will it increase the danger of fire. 3. There will not be an increase in danger to the public's health, safety and welfare. With the following condition: There may not be any future additions to the front (north) of the existing structure." i? Option B: "I move that Case No. WZ-98-12, a request for approval of a 18'6" front yard setback variance to the 50' front yard setback requirement for property located at 6410 West 44th Avenue, be DENIED for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3." eAplanningWormsVeport 6,Y ~ a a l ~ s ~ ~ ai al nl al l ml el ~I ~I ~I nl alJ w .wn~ nvE MARTENSEN $ ELEM. SCHOOL n~ ~^J-2 CUE IC - L S. +aoo I d d - a a z 1.1 W 43]H R W „3TM R - S m 3 u R u 8 ~ N $ ~ I S V I 2 R ~ m~ ~ 1 8 R$ n n n n N l el --I nl W al al 1 u STN AVE W YSTI AVE S R ~ ~ S ! 9 d O • $ 495 4fl5 4 a n {b5 F q• 473 ~ 480 H]S s ^ {t 0 Ig K s q q 2 W s4TX R 465 ' D CT R +S X - G'III ^ -3 R LAK VI 4i R-G - UB~ Cj- - - Y7 4 -74.tvs I " G-1 W L" 41T1 I al el ailL" ~I t el „I 39iX AVE 1 1 I r 11 I I 1 f ~ f r O~I=I Cl ZONE DISTRICT BOUNDRY Q LU A I S G- ( f J n I t 1 • Mf~~ I • vl D 9 s Tk AVE I a RX R S 3 •d I qT AVE ]C]S RG-I -1 1 f ~Y V x N pT D_ O nod QQ3% mio i N p6 M~ °am m Z p.. m n D I n A o DD DgQ}' mA PLO ~ zr_ y 0 rEZ PD R ID^\ /P v 0 m ~x ~ o ° s O po ~ A z e R > m I m A N ~ O D r m~ C m p p P ~A Dy (1 (A m r r ~ D 3 ~ m m o m IiL y ©z . I` i E-~r ~ima V^~^ Dm EASE T PER ~X zr m II ~D r p2 1 ~ am pg o 4S ~ s d Y PmN ay O+ • E~ z~ i0 N< B ~X N p m ~ n m XE ~o S I, n 3 -s 76' m A_m 1EJ 91DEWCLK N 21'-0' Z N n D Z 1 r 'zr ~ O S.i UMAR STREET 3 D D i _ (50' RDIDJ OW E C) W The City of Wheat ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS APPLICATION GRid~re Department of Planning and Development 6 7500 West 29th Ave., Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Phone (303) 237-6944 Applicant MAROE emol Address '?AP 0 34 ~ Phone ;Z3A --S& 93 Owner 1~i,y_- Add~~``r(~ess Phone Location of request 6glo ~t°t A#e bVHE+r R1 QGC Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request.) Change of zone or zone conditions 8 Variance/Waiver Site development plan approval Nonconforming use change Special use permit ❑ Flood plain special exception Conditional use permit Interpretation of code Temporary use/building permit Zone line modification H Minor subdivision Public Improvement Exception Subdivision Street vacation 8 Preliminary Miscellaneous plat Final Solid waste landfill/ See attached procedural guide mineral extraction permit for specific requirements. ❑ Othher Detailed Description of request d0 L- List all persons and companies who hold an interest in the described real property, as owner, mortgagee, lessee, optionee, etc. NAME ADDRESS PHONE A.klzc LAIL14 of W 32-,4- A3a-3LS3 E L-" k1 tC Co a 90Y- 3711M PI M O PA 1 sa ~ 7V y6 / Roo G 3s-- AAf # 737sbg 3`66 y I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above, without whose consent the requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners must submit power-of-attorney from the owner which approved of this actior/1 n his behalf. Signature of Applicant Subscribed and sworn to me thisa day of 19 (AZ Notary Public SEAL My commission expires Date Received- Receipt No~p Case No. City of Wheat Ridge Planning and Development Department Memorandum TO: Planning Commission FROM: U Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Case No. WZ-98-12 DATE: July 15, 1998 It came to our attention this morning that the staff report for Case No. WZ-98-12 was inadvertently left out of the packet for the meeting tomorrow night (July 16, 1998). Please insert the attached report as item B. on the agenda. I'm sorry for the inconvenience this may have caused. e9planning\fom \rnemotemp Rack and Associates Architecture, Planning Interior Design 9605 W. 49th Avenue Suite 300 Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 l303)431-8600 Fax (303)422-6341 01111L sib, ll ANGeV n M-AL LET7ER PROJECT: 1'' lC(aq-%`0L R-W G -I-(c),w. t kve_ TO: O,Pp p° W w-oc ATTN: S U uw'v WE TRANSMIT: (X) herewith under separate cover via in accordance with your request FOR YOUR: O approval review and comment (X) use THE FOWING: rawings pecifications Change Order COPIES DATE Colm r6r(~ P-ZM-L distribution to parties record ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: I DATE: i , If enclosures are not as noted, please inform us immediately. If checked below, please: Acknowledge receipt of enclosures. Return enclosures to us. ( ) information Shop Drawing Prints 1 1 Samples Shop Drawing Reproducibles Product Literature O Misc. REV. NO. DESCRIPTION ACTION CODE f,o.kqu zrl2 j F I . ACTION A. Action indicated on item transmitted D. For signature and forwarding as noted below under REMARKS CODE B. No action required E. See REMARKS below C. For signature and return to this office REMARKS lh)t RS ( c o A v" n 6J VlQ &&L ca rte,~ °da e-~C~ 12~_ ~ c~c5v . 0..e,, 0. " T mas E. Reek ~LSJTS/tae-i" If pIOJA-,' COPIES TO: 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80215 June 23, 1998 Dear Property, Owner: ~,OF *H 4), The City of Wheat ,m GRidge c0(0 R A00 This is to inform you that Case No. WZ-98-12 a request for approval of a zone change from R-2 to R-C to allow office or retail business. The property is located at 6410 W. 44" Avenue and will be heard by the Wheat Ridge Planning Commission in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue. The meeting will be held on July 16, 1998, at 7:30 p.m. All owners and/or their legal counsel of the parcel under consideration must be present at this hearing before the Planning Commission. As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. "If you are an adjacent property owner, you have the right to file a legal protest against the application which would require a 3/4th majority vote of City Council to approve the request." It shall be the applicant's responsibility to notify any other persons whose presence is desired at this hearing. If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2846. Thank you. Planning Division. C:\Barbara\PCRPTS\PLANGCOM\PUBHRG\wz9812cert.wpd (303) 234-5900 • ADMINISTRATION FAX: 234-5924 POLICE DEPARTMENT FAX: 235-2949 a d N J W d ~ C d v : m u y d C ~ y a a c ¢ ~ i - U 'U d d d d ~ O Z y ~ dl C J d a y d' c 7 T A - W . E 0 O O ~ # 1' c O d y N N N N N N N N N x ~ :o d U m N rn m m rn m m rn o ¢ °u' d 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 h a a ¢ u 0 L C~ O M M M M ~ M ~ d CM'l M U M d M G N O d N 0 > O Q j 0 O O O O O O O O O C O O d y 0 C O d d 0 O O T C O < 2, E2 0 O m m dL0 = nEOU 0~EOU dLiOU ¢O d L d 0U n U w¢O d L d y N N t J N ` J Qj d y Y y aj - " V y N d' d OI V d V ~.n a 01 C ;O O) .'a U 40 OI O 01 w O OI O a_ Y 01 y s U 0 OI O a a a y OI "O_ ~ Y N J O = 0 K K N y R N M K N> O) K y N y i K ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U N ~ O >L ~ O >L >L ~ L L ~ L O L m O >L ~ >L N N O Q w E d N C m O d a N N s U v ° w Wu . z m ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ d U W r R n n r° n °m m N O p M M M M M M M M M co W N Q tOD (00 b fOO c00 N c00 O E rn m rn m m m m m m Z aaw w N 0 a } O W H O 2 d Una ~I NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge Planning Commission on July 16, 1998, at 7:30 p.m. at 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. The following petitions shall be heard: Case No. WZ-98-12: An application by Marcie Emily for approval of a zone change from R-2 to R-C to allow office or retail business. Said property is zoned R-2 and located at 6410 West 44`" Avenue. dci Barbara Delgadillo, dcording Secretary ATTEST: l ?WdSang, City Cler To be Published: Wheat Ridge Transcript Date: June 26, 1998 MEMORANDUM I Approved Date DBPARThEWr OFPOBUC WORKS TO: Sean McCartney, Planner I FROM: Greg Knudson, Development Review Engineer C DATE: July 13, 1998 SUBJECT: 6410 West 44 s Avenue. WZ-98-12 The Public Works Department has reviewed the Planning Department referral dated July 8, 1998 for the above referenced site, and has the following comments: 1. We will need a final drainage report. 2. We will need a completed application for a Minor Dumping/Landfill Permit. In conjunction with the requirements of this permit, an erosion control plan may need to be submitted for review and approval. 3. The proposed driveway on Lamar Street needs to be located 25-feet from the intersection. cc: Alan White, Planning & Development Director Dave Kotecki, Sr. Project Engineer Steve Nguyen, Traffic Engineer John McGuire, City Surveyor File 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Telephone 303/ 237-6944 July 8, 1998 The City of Wheat Ridge The Wheat Ridge Department of Community Development has received a request rezone from Residential-Two to Restricted- Commercial, to convert the existing structure into a two-unit office space, at the property described below. Your response to the following questions and any comments on this proposal would be appreciated by JULY 23, 1998. No response from you by this date will constitute no objections or concerns regarding this proposal. CASE NO: WZ-98-12 LOCATION: 6410 West 44`h Avenue REQUESTED ACTION: Rezone property from Residential-Two to Restricted-Commercial to convert existing residential structure to office use. No building expansions are planned. Landscaping and commercial parking will be installed with a building permit. APPROXIMATE AREA: 9,105 square feet of land area 1,385 square feet of building area 1. Are public facilities or services provided by your agency adequate to serve this development? 2. Are service lines available to the development? Y 3. Do you have adequate capacities to service the development? Y 4. Can and will your agency service this proposed development subject to your rules and regulations? Y 5. Are specific easements needed on this or any other document? /f 6. Are there any concerns or problems your agency has identified which would or should affect approval of this request? A/ Please reply to: Sean McCartney, 235-2852 Completed by:~// Department of Planning & Development (Name, Agency/Department, Date) DISTRIBUTION: X Water District (Wheat Ridge) Jeffco Health Department X Sanitation District (Wheat Ridge) Jeffco Schools X Fire District (Arvada) Jeffco Commissioners Adjacent City (Arvada) X TCI of Colorado X Public Service Co. X WHEAT RIDGE Post Office X US West Communications X WHEAT RIDGE Police Department State Land Use Commission X WHEAT RIDGE Public Works Dept. State Geological Survey WHEAT RIDGE Park & Rec Commission Colorado Dept. Of Transportation WHEAT RIDGE Forestry Division Colorado Div. Of Wildlife WHEAT RIDGE Building Division "The Carnation City" C:\Barbara\AGENREF\wz9812.wpd JUL-10-98 SAT 3:53 PM r 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Telephone 303/ 237-6944 July 8, 1998 Ridge P, 2 The Wheat Ridge Department of Community Development has received a request rezone from Residential-Two to Restricted- Commercial, o convert the existing struchtre into a two-unit office snace. at the property described below. Your response to the following questions and any comments on this proposal would be appreciated by JULY 23, 1993. No response from you by this date will constitute no objections or concerns regarding this proposal. CASE NO: WZ-98-12 LOCATION: 6410 West 44" Avenue REQUESTED ACTION: Rezone property from Residential-Two to Restricted-Commercial to convert existing residential structure to office use. No building expansions are planned. Landscaping and commercial parking will be installed with a building permit. APPROXIMATE AREA: 9,105 square feet of land area 1,385 square feet of building area 11 Are public facilities or services provided by your agency adequate to serve this development? yes 2. Are service lines available to the development? yes 3. Do you have adequate capacities to service the development? X4 .S 4. Can and will your agency service this proposed development subject to your rules and regulations? yeS 5. Are specific easements needed on this or any other document? uN icNAa J 6. Are there any concerns or problems your agency has identified which would or should affect approval of this request? PDT aT 444;6 t o. e . Please reply to: Sean McCartney, 235-2852 Completed by: _ ::~Os 'r Gcf' WKr n) Department of Planning & Development (Name, Agency/Departmeut, Date) 9-ry-erg DISTRIBUTION: X Water District (Wheat Ridge) X Sanitation District (Wheat Ridge) X Fire District (Arvada) Adjacent City (Arvada) X Public Service Co. X US West Communications State Land Use Commission State Geological Survey Colorado Dept. of Transportation Colorado Div_ Of Wildlife The City of Wheat Jeffco Health Department Jeffco Schools Jeffco Commissioners X TCI of Colorado X WHEAT RIDGE Post Office X WHEAT RIDGE Police Department X WHEAT RIDGE Public Works Dept. WHEAT WAGE Park & Rec Commission WHEAT WDGE Forestry Division WHEAT RIDGE Building Division "The Carnation City" CABubua\AGENREF\wz98 t 2.wpd 7500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Wheat Telephone 303/ 237-6944 Ridge July 8, 1998 The Wheat Ridge Department of Community Development has received a request rezone from Residential-Two to Restricted- Commercial, to convert the existine structure into a two-unit office space, at the property described below. Your response to the following questions and any comments on this proposal would be appreciated by JULY 23, 1998. No response from you by this date will constitute no objections or concerns regarding this proposal. CASE NO: WZ-98-12 LOCATION: 6410 West 44' Avenue REQUESTED ACTION: Rezone property from Residential-Two to Restricted-Commercial to convert existing residential structure to office use. No building expansions are planned. Landscaping and commercial parking will be installed with a building permit. APPROXIMATE AREA: 9,105 square feet of land area 1,385 square feet of building area 1. Are public facilities or services provided by your agency adequate to serve this development? 2. Are service lines available to the development? 3. Do you have adequate capacities to service the development? 4. Can and will your agency service this proposed development subject to your rules and regulations? 5. Are specific easements needed on this or any other document? 6. Are there any concerns or problems your agency has identified which would or should affect approval of this request? Please reply to: Sean McCartney. 235-2852 Completed by: Department of Planning & Development X Water District (Wheat Ridge) X Sanitation District (Wheat Ridge) X Fire District (Arvada) Adjacent City (Arvada) X Public Service Co. X US West Communications State Land Use Commission State Geological Survey Colorado Dept. Of Transportation Colorado Div. Of Wildlife (Name, Agency/Department, Date) Jeffco Health Department Jeffco Schools Jeffco Commissioners X TCI of Colorado X WHEAT RIDGE Post Office X WHEAT RIDGE Police Department X WHEAT RIDGE Public Works Dept. WHEAT RIDGE Park & Rec Commission WHEAT RIDGE Forestry Division WHEAT RIDGE Building Division "The Carnation City" C:\Bub=\AGENREF\wz9812.wpd 05/27/1998 17:20 3032323064 MARCIE EMILY PAGE a0,1p To: City of Wheat Ridge Attention: Barbara fax 235 2857 From: Marcie Emily fax 232 3064 Date: May 27, 1998 List of adjacent prperty owners for 6410 West 44 Avenue Lynden Bridges 6490 W 44th Ave Harriet Hargrave 6390 W 44th Ave Richard Hall 4375 Lamar Shirley Ratcliff 4380 Lamar Gregory Garramone 4380 Marshall Russell Keithline Jr 6375 W 44th Ave Douglas IReler 6409 W 44th Ave Korean Bethel Presb 6415 W 44th Ave 4385 Lamar I own this property also so that is why I have 4385 Lamar as the adjacent property 05/27/1998 17:20 3032323064 MARCIE EMILY PAGE 02 To: City of Wheat Ridge Attention: Barbara fax 235 2857 From: Marcie Emily fax 232 3064 Date: May 27, 1998 The property at 6410 West 44 Avenue is presently zoned Residential-2. It is used as a rental at this time. The intention is to rezone the property to RC. This would allow office or retail business to occupy the property: SHEET PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT I PROJECT ENGINEERING DIVISION 7500 W. 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80215 FILE & LOCATION FEATURE DESIGNED BY DATE Name and Address Please Print . /}Q/ C~©S7AN76N Z335- 2 r9~H~ ' 7avne Bar ono 4265 Newland Javne Barton 4285 Newland Lola McBrien 4275 Newland Susan Stantejs 4285 Newland Patrick Hought 4315 Newland Adeline Leonar 4325 Newland Jackie Matthew 4335 Newland Cordell Brown 4345 Newland Christy Clark 4355 Newland Michael Mullin 4385 Newland Helen Coniglio 4395 Newland Thomas Tennant 4495 Newland Emilv Chavez 4260 Newland Robert Stanlev 4270 Newland Evelina Hunter 4280 Newland Robert Shirley 4300 Newland M Cledith 4320 Newland Michael Bloder 4330 Newland Trig Stanley 4340 Newland Gapep Investme" 4370 Newland Jon Bradbury GLPI(s 4380 Newland 4a4-5431 Leonard Costan 4390 ,Newland Arthur Ruscio 4450 Newland Trinity Baptis 4490 Newland William Hill 4285 Marshall Margaret Meier 4295 Marshall Norma Estes 4301 Marshall Billie Gross 4311 Marshall Rosel Metcalfe 4331 Marshall Gavla Hector 4341 Marshall Ormand Comer 4351 Marshall Debbie Fauber 4365 Marshall Andrew March 4375 Marshall Paul Hambline 4280 Marshall David Wilde 4290 Marshall Eleanor Talcot 4300 Marshall Leonard Shield 4310 Marshall Georgia Galleg 4320 Marshall Randall Morris 4340 Marshall George Crigler 4350 Marshall James Norton 4360 Marshall Gregory Garram 4380 Marshall Paul Marinkovi 4225 Lamar William Rakocy 4255 Lamar Marilyn Jacobs 4275 Lamar Joseph Nelson 4295 Lamar Michael Costan 4335 Lamar-- A-V Ateef*~f Joseph Klessig 4345 Lamar t 4ow+ Donald Christo 4355 Lamar, ou Richard Hall. 4375 Lamar- Resident 4160 Lamar Resident 4170 Lamar Paul Enrichi 4320 Lamar Bradlev Milow 4330 Lamar James Sims Tru 4340 Lamar MP.lalpP.v Wolff 4350 Lamar -/4-yg Margaret Allen 4360 Lamar Otto Hildebran 4370 Lamar Shirley Ratcli 4380 Lamar Leonid Kovtun 4285 Kendall Daniel Turner 4325 Kendall Albert Weidenh 4335 Kendall Debra Sanders 4345 Kendall Doris Bunnell 4355 Kendall Russell Keanin 4365 Kendall Thomas Evancic 4375 Kendall Ross Kuzmvch 4385 Kendall David Sodia 4200 Kendall Cvnthia Johnso 4240 Kendall Rudolf Martin 4270 Kendall John Williams 4290 Kendall Geraldine 4300 Kendall Weslev Fuller 4350 Kendall Rudolph McClin 4390 Kendall Charles Cowan 4155 Jav Jonathan Chave 4165 Jav Mark Caldwell 4160 Jav Arline DeGooye 4170 Jay Vui Mai 4410 Jav Steve Humann 4415 Jav Karl Koch 4420 Jav Akbert Drumrig 4445 Jav Ruth Folkers 4465 Jay Michael Pierso 4475 Jav Steven Bell 4485 Jay Kent Schroeder 4468 Jav Resident 6190 W 42nd Ave Resident 6275 W 42nd Ave Resident 6295 W 42nd Ave Henry Maciuk 6205 W 43rd Ave Marvin Mansfie 6250 W 43rd Ave Gavle Gartner 6255 W 43rd Ave Kathleen McKav 6290 W 43rd Ave Alfred Jutze 6240 W 44th Ave Resident 6290 W 44th Ave Foothills Prop 6300 W 44th Ave Ross Kuzmvch 6320 W 44th Ave Harriet Hargra 6390 W 44th Ave Lynden Bridges 6490 W 44th Ave Rudolph Kwilos 6500 W 44th Ave Gladys Bradbur 6556 W 44th Ave Vickers Petrol 6601 W 44th Ave Jack Zelinger 6585 W 44th Ave Jerome Roach 6545 W 44th Ave UMWA District 6525 W 44th Ave James Aab 6505 W 44th Ave Blair Fullmer 6425 W 44th Ave Korean Bethel 6415 W 44th Ave Douglas Ikeler 6409 W 44th Ave Russell Keithl 6375 W 44th Ave Manuel Silva 6351 W 44th Ave Wanchai Hongoz 6301 W 44th Ave Katherine Fox 6205 W 44th Ave Resident 6195 W 44th Ave Michele Sewell 6410 W 44th P1 Reinaldo Galle 6401 W 44th Pl Harry Coppin 6504 W 44th P1 Mary Andersen 6530 W 44th P1 John Roach 6.550 W 44th P1 Dorothy Bahr '0 W 44th P1 F A Baker 6600 W 44th P1 Dorothv Frank 6605 W_44th P1 Bonita Jackson 6460 W 45th Ave William Reaney x'40 W 45th Ave Lula Bergan GO W 45th Ave Stephen McKean 6400 W 45th Ave Robert Baker 6390 W 45th Ave Auston Breeden 6320 W 45th Ave Mark Stephenso 6302 W 45th Ave Susan Rood 6280 W 45th Ave Sean McCartney 7500 W 29 Ave ala v' 3 u -v- 4 u` V d Q N O u ~ c ,n J sN N C~ N U 4 N P N OD o. LAJ Lil LAJ v O O V W LJQ S 6 0 t0 LL O z N } F Ld d O d M F 0,1 0' F- O N co 00 of V) N D ON UJFQ~ Z uiO^co V)o x 0 U< J Q LL W (DO . jjg: Q JN F OLdN L Ln M nG U F Lu , or: to J Q O O OD 0) F P O , ,n LO 3 ao O N p0 W LL aQ ° °w JO QQ w N z 0 w W Q o = Q r V } a H ~ (Y N W 3 a- 0 0 a O v a 0 0 J F 0 z U w w J O U w W a a r zw z °-z 0 No > v, a m°w F O4 U ^W U) x W ~w O Do Y} J ^ F a c~ Z L6 o0 J ~U V J N L. ° v n `y Y 4 } z3 (AVMJoiNOla.os) il]3J .S (\i dWd1 0 U ~ I JV ~z I 5<w I wQ 5<3 Z O3 I S~ Z7a ao I I -UW \ I 4r ¢4 I mm¢ + Z o¢ '0 oww N I v o4 m ul. J I m0 IJ O W~ !LI 11 a 4 ¢ z w M z x? z I' .5Z w I..L.I I ^ a o l.. + .lC J o a Q 40 V d' W z n o I w f A U W ' n % i I 11 I I u C'4 aw 10 N I i r I N a w 3 w z w s ¢ z a o j to U w ~ I ~ / ¢ to o W .-y W I O 0 U I U vi I I -----1 - 3 W R O Z N N (n Y D .6L N L) N (O I Qr W I Z ~_mQ s ~w I J ~ w ~x U U 00 Ua Az lVld ' 321 d3d 1N3N35V3 .I 341M r-----JIB I I I °w II ~xo I wo I OOa I) -1 uuG e L-----J,E N O J I M 00 M z woo 1_ <0 w~ o+ a a} wm wz w z on w FE. >O Z jo N N I F O O JI I JI V V lO V W \ h 0 Osz~~ V Q ti Z V C":k 2 Q Q ~ CZ S do W~=WW L Cq o< Is. Q ~O VQ V W~ O~ ~WVO LAJ -d O~ v z ~W QW~~4i~ 2 az : o2 ~s In v r h=R~~'j R~+ R, W o 4T, \ 4 , v I~Z, to Q oho W° l WRY VOp tW \04j R ~J V J 4, Qtiti J~4ih~~ v ~ x W 2WLP h~VJij ~ In ~Z2ib0 Q2yV~ °oW>WQ J ~Ge~ti e gQe~~~ C~ k74 ~RVW>v~ Q Q O iI V~Q~` 0 pbv'.~0 Cl) N T ~ I~ 4 REZONING R-1 TO RC (0410 West 44th Avenue Wheat Ridge, GO 80033 APPROX. LOCATION OF FLOWLINE IN RO.W_ UTILIYY POLE 0 s x6410 LOT 24 RC ZONE UITl IYY POLE EXIST. CHAIN LINK FENCE (4' HT) TO REMAIN N ti (NOTE: CONCRETE PATIO PAD ENCROACHES INTO 8' EASEMT. BY 4' AS SHOUN. REMOVE EXIST. CHAIR LINK FENCE (*HT TO BE REMOVED AT BACK M I LOT 23 '-0' REMOVE EXISTING OA~CUT IN THIS AREA WEST 44TH AVENUE (60' ROID.) PER RECEPTION NO. SIOSIO84 w Lu oF2o0/ 9l F- U) EXIST. GONG. 14LK i PATIO PAD - 4 d a 4 D ROSE GARDEN V URVE EASEMENT F-0 PLAT 0 s 16 ° _ 41b' LOT 1 %410 WEST 44TH AVE. I - STORY BRICK. RESIDENCE W/ 2 COVERED PARKING SPACES 632' C LGH / 4 4 CONGR REMOVE EXISTING CURB CUT IN THIS VICINITY 122.2' m Isb' ROSE 122.2' 6' WOOD SOLID FENCE LIN 4' NT CHAIN LINK GATE - UTILIYY POLE NEW SIDEWALK EXTENSION ~k 1 3 0 ~ c0 W APPROX. LOCATION OF FLOWLINE IN P-0 U. 0 N W W J •4385 - LOT 2 R-2 ZONE 0 ICALE ITE PLAN NORTH :1' = 12'-0' 61TEREZN A RECK *1116 AND ASSOCIATES Ww Arddhmdum Dd er forr id IM yn oW.r AoW ""*S m ! - - _ _ _ ~ ~..w F~ . p ~ x ~ v ~ 4~5+ a . r i' -A 4 T ~ ~ ~ ~ G i, ~ ~ 1 ~ _ K:. _ ~4~, 7 l1 wR i ; to il Y r1Y? ~ v nh~ '~k"; 3 w ev.~ u n i " . FJS - ~ Fi r ~ 1 . ~ . ~ Fi e d' L 1 f. fi+~~ p~Y ~ a $ r ~ ~ r- `k f a aF ya4~ ~ a+ g ~ ~ ~ 4 , o ~ C` F ~ ram - . ~ ~ f ~y R. +F 4 ~ ;m~ ~F e. 'Y a, irc' ` ? ~ i i'9 t Y -p. gr a ~,,y t. r 4 s Ysf"~ t :;f., " y ~ -Y s p ` a 92a ~e ~ ;9 Y., ~ ~ 's ' ~ ' ~ 1. , a~~ v i _ w ~ y., ~ 1 , q~ r i - e . ~ f f ~ ~P ~ ~e+,w'rr~mw~~v~...~d~,.~~ ~++*w~.w,~:is. na,..~. ..:.-.+.w+.~•.wrab'+. , °~,,,*~+,.:vw+M.wk s a ~ ~ , ~ . A 4 s~ ti S \ r' «lw. s a,. - , i - n R " g 9 y~_ ~ ~ z a ?k 4 Y I:~ r 't- z ~ ...w~. r a.. a --a. _ ,.,mss P 'te y: r < R 4 { p ~ ~ ~ ~ F~ :,T~....~~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~.~..~.~.~....w~~.,~~~~.. ~e.~ .Y,. t e a F ~ ~ ~ ;x~ ! a _ t ~ F b 1 ~ u. ~ ~ s n - a. ~ ~ .m~ ~ z ~,,.~.v,.,,.~,~,~»,.~..~.:e,,.A.~.~..~.K~,.~.,,.~.n,~~o-~ z r ~ ~ ~ ~ gr' 1 ~,ti,~-W,..~,,. 7 - _ E . .N,u E ~ $ 4 5 f' a g a - { i.: - F ~ x s. } 1~ F r ~ Y • rTrw- n+l .sfw'M'w»w, wai~.wrx~~+>~+u., ~.~.+NMYM~#w+ '~w~NM+ai~++ ~+ww .:~.nn .u~... _ CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT NAME MRPQE CASE NO. INVOICE DATE: FEE TYPE FEE CHARGE ACCOUNT NUMBER Application Submittal See Fee Schedule aoc) oa 01-550-01-551 Publications/Notices See Fee Schedule 560 01-550-02-551 24" x 36" Blue Line $ 3.25 01-550-04-551 24" x 36" Mylar Copy $ 6.00 Single Zoning Map $ 2.00 Set of Zoning Maps $20.00 11" x 17" Color Map $ 2.00 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Comp. Plan Maps $ 2.00 ea. 53 PM C It Comp. Plan Book w/Map $25.00 Marcie Emily Fruitdale Valley Master Plan $ 2.50 RECEIPT NO:C005448 AMU FMSD ZONING REIMBURSEMENT 285 ( Subdivision Regulations $ 4.50 . FrISD ZONING, APPLICATION F 20U Zoning Ordinance $15.00 (does not include annual updates) PAYMENT RECEIVED AMOUf C'r Anil 485.1 TOTAL 485 ( Copies $.15/page . Copy of Meeting Tapes $25.00/tape Miscellaneous: 01-550-04-551 TOTAL COST: /Tg r ;0 iT ir, !0 e:\plenning\fonns\invoice