Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWZ-98-15WHEAT RIDGE CITY C INCIL MINUTES: AUGUST 24, 1f; PAGE -2- Motion by Mr. Siler to add an Agenda Item 4. A. regarding Brandon Herrera, who has been nominated as a scholar to the National Young Leaders Conference in Washington D.C. He is unable to pay and Mr. Siler will ask for $1,000 to fund his trip; seconded by Mr. Mancinelli; carried 7-1 with Mr. DiTullio voting no. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ORDINANCES ON SECOND READING Item 1. An application submitted by Bolle, Inc. for approval of an Amendment to Pacifica Development Properties II, LLC, Planned Industrial Development, 9500 W. 49th Avenue (Interstate to Frontage Road North). (WZ-98-15)(BoI16) Item 1 was introduced by Mrs. Worth; title read by the Clerk. Tom Reed was sworn in by the Mayor; he is the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer for Bolle Sun Glasses; he asked for approval of their sign. Martin Omer, Planning Department, was sworn in by the Mayor and presented the staff report. Motion by Mrs. Worth - Amendment to PID - that Case No. WZ-98-15, Amendment to the Final Development Plan for Pacifica Development Properties II, LLC., Planed Industrial Development, for the erection of one additional freestanding freeway oriented sign, internally lit, with a maximum height of 45 feet and a maximum sign face square footage of 137 feet per sign face, for property located at 9500 West 49th Avenue, be approved for the following reasons: 1. Approval of the amendment, along with the Recommended Conditions of Approval, is not expected to cause a substantial negative impact to City services or residents. 2. Approval of the amendment will not change the overall nature, intent or character of the approved PID or the Final Development Plan. 3. The City, the property owner, and the applicant will benefit from the approval of this case, which approval is expected to result in the retention of this user at this location with related employment and economic benefits to the City. Approval of the amendment is subject to the following conditions: 1. Per the Public Works Department, sign placement shall meet the sight distance triangle requirements as specified in the City Code. 2. Per the Police Department, the solid base of the sign shall be finished with an anti-graffiti sealant. 3. Should the applicant for this case, being Bolle Sunglasses, vacate their administrative office and/or any future retail operation occurring on this site, the subject sign and associated poles or supports will be completely removed from the premises; seconded by Mr. Siler. . Mrs. Dalbec asked for a friendly amendment to have a maximum sign face square footage of 150 feet per sign face; Mrs. Worth accepted. Motion by Mrs. Dalbec for an amendment to remove Condition #3; seconded by Mrs. Shaver; Motion by Mr. DiTullio to call for the question; carried 6-2 with Mr. Eafanti and Mr. Mancinelli voting no. WHEAT RIDGE CITY C; INCIL MINUTES: AUGUST 24, 1~: ' PAGE -3- Vote on Amendment to remove condition #3; failed 5-3 with Mrs. Dalbec, Mrs. Shaver and Mr. Eafanti voting yes. Original Motion carried 7-1 with Mr. DiTullio voting no. Motion by Mrs. Worth that Case No. WZ-98-15, a setback variance of 23 feet from the 30 foot minimum requirement for the erection of a freestanding freeway oriented sign seven feet from the property line, for property located at 9500 West 49th Avenue, be approved for the following reasons: 1. Approval of the variance, along with the Recommended Conditions of Approval, is not expected to cause a substantial negative impact to City services or residents. 2. Approval of the variance will not change the overall nature, intent or character of the approved PID or the Final Development Plan. 3. A hardship exists to the property associated with this case, being that significant physical constraints limit the visual access of this site compared to other similarly situated and zoned development projects along the highway corridor. Approval of the variance is subject to the following conditions: 1. Per the Public Works Department, sign placement shall meet the sight distance triangle requirements as specified in the City Code. 2. per the Police Department, the solid base of the sign shall be finished with an anti-graffiti sealant. 3. Should the applicant for this case, being Bolle Sunglasses, vacate their administrative office and/or any future retail operation occurring on this site, the subject sign and associated poles or supports will be completely removed from the premises; seconded by Mr. Eafanti; carried 7-1 with Mr. DiTullio voting no. Item 2. Approval of a four lot minor subdivision on property zoned R-2 and R-3 located at 3195 Saulsbury Street and 3190 Teller Street. (MS-98-03)(Saulsbury Properties) Mr. Mancinelli stated that he and Mr. Donnelly met and reviewed this Agenda Item, and declared no bias regarding this Item, as did Mr. Donnelly. Item 2. was introduced by Mr. DiTullio, who also read the title. Mrs. Worth stated that this Item is Quasi-Judicial and discussion should not be going on prior to a Public Hearing. Mr. Dahl answered Mrs. Worth and stated this type of meeting is not encouraged and Case Law states that there cannot be a bias. As a challenger to this meeting bias would have to be proved. Mrs. Worth asked Mr. Dahl to provide to Council an memorandum on how to handle Quasi-Judicial matters. Alec Garbini/Architect, 1546 Cole Blvd., Golden, was sworn in by the Mayor and presented the applicant's case. Meredith Reckert, Planner II, was sworn in by the Mayor and gave the staff report. CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO CiiyCoupcll<< DATE OF MEETING: August 24, 1998 DATE PREPARED: August 14, 1998 CASE NO. & NAME: WZ-98-15 CASE MANAGER: Martin Orner ACTION REQUESTED: Amendment to Final Development Plan Including a Setback Variance for Freestanding Sign Seven Feet From Property Line LOCATION: 9500 West 491n Avenue (Interstate 70 Frontage Road North) APPLICANT(S): Bolle', Inc. OWNER(S): First Industrial Realty 5350 South Roslyn Street Englewood, CO APPROXIMATE AREA: Combined total of approximately 6.97 acres PRESENT ZONING: Planned Industrial Development PRESENT LAND USE: et ' an o rneccial SURROUNDING ZONING: North: R-C, Restricted Commercial South: Interstate 70 East: R-3, Residential and PRD, Planned Residential Dev. West: C-1, Commercial One SURROUNDING LAND USE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE AREA: DATE PUBLISHED: DATE POSTED: DATED LEGAL NOTICES SENT: ENTER INTO RECORD: (X) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (X) ZONING ORDINANCE 0 SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OTHER North: Commercial, and Vacant Land South: Interstate 70 East: Residential West: Offices Commercial Activity Center August 5, 1998 August 3, 1998 August 3, 1998 (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) SLIDES (X) EXHIBITS JURISDICTION: All notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. REQUEST This is an application to amend the existing and approved Pacifica Development Properties 11, LLC Planned Industrial Development Final Development Plan for the erection of one additional freestanding freeway oriented sign, including a setback variance. The sign as proposed will be internally lit, 45 feet high, with a sign face dimension of seven feet by 23 feet 10 inches. The sign is pro osed to be oval in shape, which would put the actual square footage calculation at approximately quare feet per sign face. The application also includes a request for variance of 23 feet from the minimum 3 setback from property line for an actual setback of seven feet. II SUMMARY On August 11, 1997, the Wheat Ridge City Council approved Case No. WZ-97-10, being the Pacifica Development Properties 11, LLC Planned Industrial Development Final Development Plan. Said PID entitled the developer to construct a 106,524 square foot commercial/industrial project generally adjacent to Interstate 70. As part of the approval, one freeway oriented sign was permitted at a height of 24 feet 11 inchesand a size of 260 square feet per sign face, to be located at the western-most part of the project area, and visible from Interstate 70. Since that time the project has been fully constructed and all buildings in the western half of the project (71,006 square feet) have been occupied, with the eastern-most buildings (35,518 square feet) remaining unoccupied. The southeastern portion of this development remained vacant largely because it is not visible from Interstate 70. This is due to physical limitations of the site relative to the highway as well as the Colorado Department of Transportation's sight obscuring and noise reducing fence located directly in front of this portion of the development only. In July of 1998, the international eye wear company Bolle' moved its North American headquarters and distribution facilities into the majority of remaining building space available in the eastern portion of the site. The applicant has stated that this site was chosen due to its location next to Interstate 70 and the name recognition opportunities available to the traveling public using the highway. The applicant has submitted this amendment and variance case in order to project the corporate image it requires to the traveling public and outdoor enthusiasts traveling I-70. f O The City of Wheat Ridge Zoning Regulations Seevelopments 10 e)(5) permits a maximum of 400 square feet of sign face area per sign face for multi-us located adjacent to the highway. The existing signage measures approximately 17 square feet of signage per sign face, and the proposed sign measures approximately' r24 square feet of signage per sign face, for a proposed total ofd"square feet of signage per sign face. This is 75 square feet less than the maximum permitted by the Zoning Regulations. ( f l c-,260415?:- ~ , C/49 ~L III AMENDM ~L~ PID AND FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN / U The eastern portion he` tgnifrcant visual limitations and a second sign is proposed for visual identity from the interstate highway for a user with prominent national and international name recognition. A second freeway oriented sign, with interior lighting, to be 45 feet high, with a maximum sign area of 1'`' square feet per sign face will not create a significant negative impact to surrounding residents, bus esse r property owners. Staff also believes the sign face design is simple and easily 3 City Council Page 2 WZ-98-15/Bolle read, and is therefore not expected to create a hazard to the traveling public or to have negative impacts to safety type issues. IV VARIANCE REVIEW CRITERIA Staff has prepared the following responses to the standard review criteria used to evaluate variance requests: Can the property in question yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located? Yes. If a different tenant had leased the property who didn't need viability from the freeway, the property could yield a reasonable return in use, service or income. Nonetheless, the subject address was not leased by such a different tenant. The subject leasable area is part of an overall Planned Industrial Development for commercial, retail and light industrial uses. It is located on the eastern-most portion of the project area, which has physical limitations significantly impacting the site's visibility from Interstate 70. A sight obscuring and noise reducing fence erected by the State Department of Transportation is located directly in front of this portion of the development only. A major international business concern predominantly catering to outdoor recreational enthusiasts needs visual identity to traffic using Interstate 70 heading to and from the C mountains as an essential element of their business needs. Other users would not need such high visibility. Therefore, the subject sign which has been expressly designed for visual identification from Interstate 70, is necessary. The variance itself is to erect the sign seven feet from the project's property line. Since this site is fully developed, no other reasonable locations for the sign are available. 2. Is the plight of the owner due to unique circumstances? Yes. As stated in 1. above, the subject address is considerably lower than the adjacent portion of Interstate 70 and the Department of Transportation's sight obscuring fence. The combination of these elements makes the address invisible from the highway. The site is fully constructed with very limited options of the location of the sign. 3. If the variation were granted, would it alter the essential character of the locality? No. Other freeway oriented signs are located regularly along both sides of Interstate 70. Locating this sign seven feet from the property line is not expected to alter the essential character of the locality. 4. Would the particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved result in a particular hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out? City Council Page 3 WZ-98-15/Bolle Yes. As stated above, the applicant has located their international business offices and distribution facilities at this location. The physical condition and topography of the site lies below and outside of visual range of Interstate 70 traffic. The proposed location of the sign is the most sensible one available due to the existing parking area, drive areas, landscaping and buildings located on the site. 5. Would the conditions upon which the petition for a variation is based be applicable, generally, to the other property within the same zoning classification? No. This is a site and use specific variance application. There presently exists a deficit of suitably zoned constructed leasable space along this portion of Interstate 70 with this amount of available square footage for office and industrial uses. This particular location/address meets all the applicant's needs but is greatly impacted by site specific visual limitations to the highway. The site is already fully improved with landscaping, parking, drive areas, and buildings. The proposed location of the sign seven feet from the property line is the most sensible location for this sign. 6. Is the purpose of the variation based exclusively upon a desire to make money out of the property? No. This site is completely constructed per the approved RID and Final Development Plan. Drive areas, parking, buildings and landscaping are all installed. No other reasonable location exists for the erection of the sign, resulting in the variance request of 23 feet the minimum setback in order to erect the sign seven feet from the property line. Has the alleged difficulty or hardship been created by any person presently having an interest in the property? No. The hardship is inherent in the physical aspects of the subject property, and the approved and constructed business/industrial park. 8. Would the granting of the variations be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located? No. The proposed sign location will not be injurious or detrimental to the public welfare and is not expected to pose a hazard to vehicular traffic. The proposed sign does not create significant visual impacts to neighboring residential users. No one from the public attended the neighborhood meeting and no concerns have been received from neighboring landowners and/or users. 9. Would the proposed variation impair the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion in the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. City Council Page 4 WZ-98-15/Bolle No. The approval of the 23 foot setback variance is not expected to cause any of the negative impacts as listed above. 10. If it is found in criteria 8 and 9 above that granting of the variation would not be detrimental or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood, and it is also found that public health and safety, public facilities and surrounding property values would not be diminished or impaired, then would the granting of the variance result in a benefit or contribution to the neighborhood or the community as distinguished from an individual benefit on the part of the applicant, or would granting of the variance result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities? Yes. The approval of this application will create an economically viable corporate location for the applicant, which in turn means increased employment opportunities for local residents, and significant overall economic benefits to the community as a whole. V NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING A neighborhood meeting was held on August 12, 1998. The following persons attended: Thomas Reed, Bolle', Inc. Jim Liley, Gordon Sign Company Martin Omer, City of Wheat Ridge No one from the public or other interested agencies attended this meeting. VI REFERRALS Responding With Concerns: City of Wheat Ridge Police Department In a memorandum dated August 8, 1998, the finished with an anti-graffiti sealant. he sign be City of Wheat Ridge Department of Public Works In a memorandum dated August 10, 1998, the Department states that the sign placement shall meet the sight distance triangle requirements specified in the City Code. Responding Without Concerns: Jefferson County Planning Department Arvada Fire Protection District City of Arvada Planning Department Planning Commission Page 5 WZ-98-15/Bolle Notified But Not Responding: Public Service Company U.S. West Communications TCI of Colorado VII PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION PLANNING COMMISSION: The Planning Commission hearing for this case is scheduled for August 20, 1998.. Therefore insufficient time is available to include the Planning Commission update in the City Council report. Planning staff will present the City Council with a Planning Commission update at the during the Council hearing for this case. VIII STAFF CONCLUSION / /2~ Planning staff, the applicant and his consultant have met o`Vssev/eml `oc%asions to discuss the importance of this overall application to this particular business and t e City. Staff believes this application is submitted for valid reason due to inherent physical limi tions of the property which severely limit visual access to this particular portion of the development. S off believes that the additional freeway oriented square feet of area per sign face will not create sign, internally lit, 45 feet high and a maximum of 1 24, significant negative impacts to nearby residents, and will not create negative impacts to neighboring property owners or businesses. Staff has inspected the site and has concluded that actual locational choices for the sign is restricted to the area chosen by the applicant and that a hardship exists in said locational choices and overall in achieving a visual presence to the traveling public on Interstate 70. Granting a 23 foot variance from the 30 foot minimum setback requirement in order to erect this sign seven feet from the property line will not create negative impacts to the public, neighboring residents, businesses or property owners. The essential character of the PID and the Final Development Plan will not be altered with the approval of the amendment and the variance. Council is being requested to approve the additional sign with a setback variance. The sign will be either black or red with final determination made by the applicant. The red sign is the sign the applicant prefers, pending approval by the landlord. If not approved, the black sign will be constructed. Staff recommends approval of this case. G C~ 01^ 4 ~tQ / IX RECOMMENDED MOTIONS /~t _ Option "I move that Case No. WZ-98-15, Am$n ment to Final DevelopGment Plan fo~ r Pacifica Developm Lt Properties 11, LLC, Planned Industrial Development Final Development Plan including a setback varia of 23 feet from the 30 foot minimum requirement, for the erection of one additional freestanding free oriented sign, internally lit, N;Va maximum height of 45 feet and a maximum sign face square footage o 50 feet per sign face, for propert toted at 9500 West 49" Avenue, be APPROVED for the follo 'ng reasons: Approval of the amend t and variance, along with the Reco ended Conditions of Approval, is not expected to se a substantial negative impact to services or residents. Planning Commission Paaoe 6 WZ-98-15/Bolle 2. Approval of the amendment and variance will not ange the overall nature, intent or character of the roved PID or the Final Develop- t Plan. 3. A hardship exists to e property associated with this case, mg that significant physical constraints limit the vis access of this site compared to other 'milarly situated and zoned development projects alon he highway corridor. 4. The City, property owner and app cant will benefit from the approval oft ' case, which approval is expected to result in the tention of this user at this location with re ted employment and economic benefits to t City. with the following conditions: 1. Per the Public Works Department, sign placement sha eet the sight distance triangle requirements as specified in the City Code. 2. Per the Police Department, the solid base of the sign shall be fin' hed with an anti-graffiti sealant. Shoul the i4l plicant for this case, being Bolle' Sunglasses, vacate their administrative office and or an ture retail operation occurring on this site, the subject sign and associated poles or support s be completely removed from the premises. Option B: "I move that Case . WZ-98-15, Amendment to Final Development Plan for Pacifica Development Properties 11, LLC, ned Industrial Development Final Development Plan including a setback variance of 23 feet from the foot minimum requirement, for the erection of one additional freestanding freeway oriented sign with a aximum height of 45 feet and a maximum sign face square footage of 150 feet per sign face, for propert located at 9500 West 49`b Avenue, be DENIED for the following reasons: 1. Approval of the amendment and variance ' cause a substantial negative impact to City services or residents. 2. Approval of the amendment and variance is not in conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan designation for the area. of the amendment and variance will result in a PID and Final Development Plan r to that previously approved by the City Council. 4. No hardshr to the property has been demonstrated." CABarbara\CCRPTS\wz-98-I S wpd Planning Commission Page 7 WZ-98-15/Bolle Notified But Not Responding: Public Service Company U.S. West Communications TCI of Colorado VII PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION PLANNING COMMISSION: The Planning Commission hearing for this case is scheduled for August 20, 1998. Therefore insufficient time is available to include the Planning Commission update in the City Council report. Planning staff will present the City Council with a Planning Commission update at the time of Council hearing for this case. VIII STAFF CONCLUSION Planning staff, the applicant and his consultant have met on several ccasions to discuss the importance of this overall application to this particular business and the City. taff believes this application is submitted for valid reason due to inherent physical limitations of pc property which severely limit visual access to this particular portion of the development. Staff elieves that the additional freeway oriented sign, internally lit, 45 feet high and a maximum of square feet of area per sign face will not create significant negative impacts to nearby residents, and 1 not create negative impacts to neighboring property owners or businesses. Staff has inspected the site and has concluded that actual locational choices for the sign is restricted to the area chosen by the applicant and that a hardship exists in said locational choices and overall in achieving a visual presence to the traveling public on Interstate 70. Granting a 23 foot variance from the 30 foot minimum setback requirement in order to erect this sign seven feet from the property line will not create negative impacts to the public, neighboring residents, businesses or property owners. The essential character of the PID and the Final Development Plan will not be altered with the approval of the amendment and the variance. Staff recommends approval of this case. IX RECOMMENDED M ~ '1 Option A: /J m. / S~ AMENDMENT TO PID: "I ove that Case No Z-98-15, Amendment to the Final Development Plan for Pacifica Development Properties 11, LLC anned Industrial Development for the erection of one additional freestanding freeway oriented s' , internally lit, with a maximum height of 45 feet and a maximum sign face square footage of eet per sign face, for property located at 9500 West 491h Avenue, be APPROVED for the following reasons: 1. Approval of the amendment, along with the Recommended Conditions of Approval, is not expected to cause a substantial negative impact to City services or residents. 2. Approval of the amendment will not change the overall nature, intent or character of the approved PID or the Final Development Plan. Page 6 WZ-98-15Bolle The City, property owner and applicant will benefit from the approval of this case, which approval is expected to result in the retention of this user at this location with related employment and economic benefits to the City. Approval of the amendment is subject to the following conditions: 1. Per the Public Works Department, sign placement shall meet the sight distance triangle requirements as specified in the City code. 2. Per the Police Department, the solid base of the sign shall be finished with an anti-graffiti sealant. 3. Should the applicant for this case, being Belle' Sunglasses, vacate their administrative office and/or any future retail operation occurring on this site, the subject sign and associated poles or supports will be completely removed from the premises. VARIANCE: "I move that Case No. WZ-98-15, a setback variance of 23 feet from the 30 foot minimum requirement for the erection of a freestanding freeway oriented sign seven feet from the property line, for property located at 9500 West 49h Avenue, be APPROVED for the following reasons: 1. Approval of the variance, along with the Recommended Conditions of Approval, is not expected to cause a substantial negative impact to City services or residents. 2. Approval of the variance will not change the overall nature, intent or character of the approved PID or the Final Development Plan. 3. A hardship exists to the property associated with this case, being that significant physical constraints limit the visual access of this site compared to other similarly situated and zoned development projects along the highway corridor. Approval of the variance is subject to the following conditions: 1. Per the Public Works Department, sign placement shall meet the sight distance triangle requirements as specified in the City code. 2. Per the Police Department, the solid base of the sign shall be finished with an anti-graffiti sealant. 3. Should the applicant for this case, being Belle' Sunglasses, vacate their administrative office and/or any future retail operation occurring on this site, the subject sign and associated poles or supports will be completely removed from the premises. Page 7 WZ-98-15/Bo11e Option B: "I move that Case No. WZ-98-15, Amendment to Final Development Plan for Pacifica Development Properties 11, LLC, Planned Industrial Development Final Development Plan including a setback variance of 23 feet from the 30 foot minimum requirement, for the erection of one additional freestanding freeway oriented sign with a maximum height of 45 feet and a maximum sign face square footage of 150 feet per sign face, for property located at 9500 West 49th Avenue, be DENIED for the following reasons: 1. Approval of the amendment and variance will cause a substantial negative impact to City services or residents. 2. Approval of the amendment and variance is not in conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan designation for the area. 3. Approval of the amendment and variance will result in a PID and Final Development Plan not similar to that previously approved by the City Council. 4. No hardship to the property has been demonstrated." Q\PLANNING\CASES\C.C\wz-98-15.wpd Page 8 WZ-98-15Bolle 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80215 August 6, 1998 Dear Property Owner: Tho City of ~~OF W HEgT Q4 i Wheat m GRidge °°coRp~o This is to inform you that Case No. WZ-98-15 which is a request for approval of an Amendment to Pacifica Development Properties II, LLC, Planned Industrial Development Final Development Plan with a setback variance to allow an additional freeway oriented freestanding sign with a 7' setback variance. Said property is zoned PID, located at 9500 West 49" Avenue, and will be heard by the Wheat Ridge City Council in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue. The meeting will be held on August 24, 1998 at 7:00 p.m. All owners and/or their legal counsel of the parcel under consideration must be present at this hearing. As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to notify any other persons whose presence is desired at this hearing. If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2846. Thank you. Planning Division. C:\Barbara\PCRPTS\PLANGCOM\PUBHRG\wz981 Scer lettecwpd /I`7~l S $~rCcV~/J a-Y~T!✓>C~l N~~'l CL t ✓t /u -7- !r"" rro c. ~C✓VTV it.FC/lu-err~G ,)rizs !F 7 SrsnA?cst~es vy~ RYc 9°lL~ S x /37fE'~ ,-A J7-7" -7~S ;try/.//! i~49Y7-C'l7 7771K~G /SrZ' JSI Cl..ilYeY~ ~l/_S /7U..S /~✓7 - ~y--. /2.t-~2~L✓C\~j .✓v~j7C~~ ~ i2.64.~`~% 7v /~cJdc-S U~-S ~ G ~z !Z rZY/ rri c7v✓~1~ d-(A e-- Tl1 77;J S/Y1C1,4AA1t111 O j,-k,6- AA97- ~l s/c~ ✓c /:Zz- /I- sl s/j /Ir/,) ull c~ Cv✓4 W' ~ 72Lf $ G/1`R-e/}6a ~-1 /f~~ w~ ~J3i i~2 y/u~ j7~ ~2or~z7- ctv✓c5~2t/~3. (303) 234-5900 • ADMINISTRATION FAX: 234.5924 • POLICE DEPARTMENT FAX: 235-2949 ~jcrt444 1, bA 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE August 6, 1998 Dear Property Owner: WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80215 ~~OFWHEgT~, IheCity of Wheat c ,m GRidge C,OL O R A00 This is to inform you that Case No. WZ-98-15 which is a request for approval of an Amendment to Pacifica Development Properties II, LLC, Planned Industrial Development Final Development Plan with a setback variance to allow an additional freeway oriented freestanding sign with a 7' setback variance. Said property is zoned PID, located at 9500 West 49th Avenue, and will be heard by the Wheat Ridge City Council in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue. The meeting will be held on August 24, 1998 at 7:00 p.m. All owners and/or their legal counsel of the parcel under consideration must be present at this hearing. As an area resident or interested parry, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to notify any other persons whose presence is desired at this hearing. If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2846. Thank you. Planning Division. Ct\Barbara\PCRPTS\PLANGCOM\PUBHRG\wz9815cenletter.wpd (303) 234-5900 • ADMINISTRATION FAX: 234-5924 POLICE DEPARTMENT FAX: 235-2949 6<0 v w~ v v O 1 O N C U O `.O V w a ~ a UI U K o m ` Z > NI K c ~ a 9 t d i a m N O O « o a N w U L Q m ¢9 C E ~ .0 ~U ~ tll )O N N ~ l(1 l0 111 Yl N p~ ~ 'O - N O] N O] M N W OJ M W p N N U! (J N N N N N N N N N ¢ N° 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 U_ 0 lO N d . M M M N M I~ M p M M M M M O M d' M 82 )O M O M on O M C O C O O v V N M O O O ik O O ~ O W N m SOD 60 a0 co O o~m j W -0 00 N N - o _0] m 'O -W E j0 - s ~0 -O o N - LL u 0 m 0 0 m oLU U aQU N¢U O1¢0 mQ0 (n m O I c i C N N ~Q N N L o F' Rl C N O) x N O N 1 N 'O L.. v O) O ~ L N N O O) 9 d mL m 0-6 W m v a N m > v 'E m a m m M a -o v 0 a l6 ) c v :o N v v y a_ m v a _ > > V C' M 7~6 21 fA a: L L ' N N NL~ 'a N v L ~ OL m2 > w V~ m~ L ~ V rn~ VL rn~ V rn2 d L m2i a N D K U N C N Q r O) i W C N N - . N 00 m a ' cU OK iw ~ E - t m ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ z d Lf) Y w N Q m m m m m m ro m m 0 0 0 N O t0 O N O ~O O )O o ~ r N O N O ~O O ❑ 0 m m m w m m m m m I- > V z' ¢aw w C'4 U. d Q Q a =00U v 'U LO ~I O a A a z„ N U F v m a O a 8 z R F 9 N O `Of C N ~ m N C U ~ 3 ~ 9 a ~ v K ~ ~ Q 'm u u ~ a K ~ m c Z > ml ~ m K c 7 " I > N rn o N = N . 0 E n E 0 n U _ U L O N O O C ry O E # 40 t0 m m m m m ~O ~O _ N QJ "O a N m m m m - m w M m m rn m m m rn x a m N m U m N rn N m N rn N N N N N N 3 m°~ 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 u O 16 N n I~ M m M O M O m M M O M M _ ~ m M a M O # M ~ T V M Q . - ~ O m W 10 _ m m UO m 'Om > O>O m NTm 'C O V N E > O O uNi w m d 650 > O y L m h> 0 O 2 0 0 d N QU SQU O Y TU cc Na0 O 7Q0 mU cQU N ° ' L mm cmm O m=m .5; Y2J 2`m- >Y°m a~-o m O n va ova mmd E,ii° -yv._ m v:- mNO mv._ N m y Q m K R ~ ~cN 6 mmir 'gy ~m m K ~ m 3 iq~~ Ka °-a- v io m NZ ~ Q m do`° L a~2 Q L `°~rn ov U UI m C m ~ ' V ~j L ~ L >L> Q ~ ~ ~ ~ U (O C W N L O) N "Q N L O D7 > O) ~ > Q7 ~ C N N m~ ` ~ Q m ' ~ n N m0 a~- ' X m E m m 4Y LU r U Q N N N m C V V N (7 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p co d ~ ^O N N N N W W 0 E m m m m rn rn rn m m F- > U z' aau, w = U S p i N r 4 Q n ° o2U v a R 3 G d' R a R C R N N C ` 'V y ~ ~ -p R a a ' a a R m c Q u m ` c o Z w ~ RI d K C ) I CL > K ~O R N po O N C N N .r - N O y0 E 0 a ~ w u o.O c E ~ .0 r= # ~ iR ~ N N N N N O N N V - a - N ~ m W ~ W M ~ W W x o m N m m U rn N w N m N m N rn N rn ~ m N m N m N Q m 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 U_ O N { 4 d (O M M N O M ~ O R m N M O M h M O M N M O M C M O xL O c T O O N O O > p Q N N N r O U N c# O m c# O - O 4 t0 - w C R R o - m u p d y _ ro c m No E_ m W m N y o U i m 00o Q U d E m O R m e O .-o Q U a m ~ U Q U E> O Q U d Q U b N O <6 N > M m U C L m O O = L A L N I~ O L R U > N a . N m O U N N WE R Y N a L v m N R V a m J O 0 U T ~ N m V a N V a d N R Q U ~ U p a d' ~ I7 O a 0 0 L > ~ V U U-'O d O d ~ M~ LL~ O W J. ~ y ~ p N ~ R O V O ry M O pmj V UJ U l m N L ~ ' .0 a [I' L ~ Q V > L > M t r U R J [T L O) ~ m V > L OI > L m U) O C y a) m u m Q ~ W E N y r O a M O K ~U v~iiw E m R N r w u Q v v v v a v °a - °'i n N O 0 N ~ O N O VI N N O N O ~ O «1 O Q O n n n ~ n n n n ~ O E n m n rn n m ~ m m m m m rn Z Q ¢ w w M C!) O1 x F LL N w 0 F 4 a Q 5 o = U R N Q N O 5 W on .5 F~ 0 N 5 R z w N E Q+ O W m v u > N ~i N N U N Q. w O p ~ V F b d T N N . 9O m 5 7 z H W d W a W c W y N C L 'V y O ~ 'O a ~ a K v C ¢ v ~ O a \ L Z ~ d WI K C 7 a a -o ~ o w W WEo d U U L Q ~ da c .0 .0 O'er # N N N N N N N N N _ N 'O WE ~ N O] M N M N M W N m OJ m x _ , m N O m U- m N rn N w N m N rn N m N rn N N N ¢ m° 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 U_ 0 N O R C d O M M N N M M M M M d ~ O U N I~ M M N M O M M O O~ C c # O N ~ O N O ¢ N ~ N ~ O # O # O 4~ O A _W c 0 N .M Y# N =N W O E N _M _c0 > _p~ N N `Oi O N "O N j O W 60 w I- M f/I C> O c> O U 'O ] O U N d W m ¢ U O W O U M¢ O O Q U L O O W N O .d ¢ U J¢ Q (n 9 m .L. W Ol N ' 9 L W O OI N L W m 0) F m U 10 _ W K 'O W L W m 0) c. L W O) m N W O~ O ` W ' O t6 W N O O O C ~ O W L a 'O_ U C W T U _ _ C C O 9 V O T -O V 'O_ V' "O 4) _ w W W ¢ J 2i 0 > 0 O V 3 ❑ K y ~i O p O O N M ~ 'O T> O~ N m~ Y a > K O> lC -O d.0 L N o m W ^ N O!0 > ~ y ILLO O d d 0 N _ U~ U N ~ ^ a ' .>WC M N J C L M CV'1 L ~ J C J O M 'L ~.>>C M > L 2 C UI W L 'O > m ~ T ~ O N ❑ O) ~ O) ~i D7 C y N N~ U y ¢ ❑ E W N 'C O O o. N 00 ° Uw 0~ ~U E a y LO U Q M M M M M N N w N O 0 N N N N N N N N N 0 O W N N N N N N N O N 0 E rn m m rn m rn rn m rn I- > V z' a¢w LLI C) x oc ~ OBE- d d Q ~ } o w Lo E ~ q v _O W on 5 U R!i O O E ro z W ro 0 0. 0 o, m v J U W Q'. U (l. W O E O zW Y U O c W y .a m U O W .n 6 7 z H P~ C N a c N N N C d U R a fY a N c Q > N ° U L d \ ° d c Z ~ WI O w G I I K > K vo ° Nmo NCN CN I E o 0 d R~ u t O R E ° C R O R # ~O ~O ~O ~O ~O t0 t0 ~O ~O v m a m m m m m m m m m x_ tG N N V m N N N N N N N N N ¢ R° S 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 U _ 0 Q _ • N l C G d . Q O M O M M M O M I S M O M ~ O M ~ M ° ~ d O _ ~ N p _ O d~ W 0 O U R> 0 W 0 O ` O C N ~ c y 41 O R 0 O) O N Q O d a N u Nfnm 3QO >Qo QU °a ~m Q0 ;QO `o-M u i c `00 U o W - dr 0 00 o fns o0 wt mno N a d mU UmL m s rrn m d $rn m N RU' U cm m a `mmU crn fn E U y UI a O. I- R L.. V a_ 9 V "O_ V -O :0 E C R N V' U_ 3 R R O O (p ~ > a O "O _ N N Z R R R ~ N Z p R Z p R j r U NR 'O i° Q N L CO . L OJ L ¢ M L Q M t Q > a -6 N L a p > W> (A 10 > (Aj OJ C rn N m ~ ° m Q Q :C_ c N N C 2 _ O O N WO ~U w E ❑ [I ❑ ® ❑ ❑ R Z O Lf) U W Q N N W W ' (rD N /A co V 0 N O N O Y1 O 10 Y1 O ~O O ~O O 10 n ~O O Q 00 n n r n W O E m m m m m m m w m m H U z' aaw w=0 2 p C4 U- (D Q Q o } O W 0 2 U R ~ r. ~I . N Q d O a W C N O R z ° a° a m a 7 N ~i N N w 0 a z U aR+ 4: FO 9 N T p N N a O z F a R N J~ J d C d ~ R a R L R y N L R m ~ a a K ~ N ¢ 'v u u ~ n ~ O R C Z ~ NI J ~ N ~ G l I ) v CL K 0 N ~ 0 l~ N N N - Ul O E 0 u R L O R O a C R O R :r it t0 O t0 N to t0 h N N r a = N n U R q m O m ~ ~ R X N N U O j N p j N O j N N N rn N O> N rn N O) N < ¢ R° 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 U _ 0 O ~ N ~ U R a a ~ c~ M T Ip r M _ Cl O m in m o V ~ R M C') F= W N ("l N W L O > O _ N R N R# W _ O N ~ O C O N 'O O I O i m y ° EQ m m ai _ o 0 : O or mi R A W ¢0 i Ram C 2 am d v w a L > O U i0 O R m E= 0 m Q OU 0 Q U n a L 0 L L U ° L 0 t w 0 0 UI L O U I71 U _ U L C U V N a i U f, 0 U ,r.. N a a Y m m K M RLU a a O Em rn a R `mrn rn 'O a jq o$ O' a `m ~D Ea L R N r c-o N o N R ¢ s a E U 6 ° _O R O o L C R = n> o .4+ R w w R v a ~r R m R In 3 L- K 0~ Iy~ Y 3 0 u m K K m _ Zvi 2) K° m V 'o . ° d m Z U ~s ~ v o d 9 c s w d ° ° L~ R ~ m ¢ L J o m L m L N ¢ L > ` n m N U R 'O N'6 R=~ a a C7 L rn~ °N m~ C m~i t"l W In V W d. J jn 41 N O N ¢ Q 'r E R N O O N r J I /1 N O R ~U U~ w E ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ R z R U w ~ a 6 o o N C 0 `0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 r r r r r r r n r r n r rn r rn n m rn n m rn m rn rn W O E Z Q Q W LU-r0- w LL N 0 3. Q a } O W o ~I ~ L R Q N 0 fl W OD L O N E N z 0 C4 O Q. m N U d U N 0. O U P E J zR ~ U F O a ti a w 0 `v F E z y F-- c a m N ~ a `w ~ d C 'u y y a ~ a ~ ~ N ~ Q r 'a y u ~ n O t Z d Z ml O a ~ ~ c N m 0 w = ~ : . N o E 0 E o a N U 0 L O N O a C 1 ,0 N # N t0 l0 N t0 N t0 N t0 U N ~ N M of ro M M M o~ o] M % N N U N N N N N N N N ¢ m° 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 U _ 0 O IC N O. M M M U C M O N C N _ C O O O j O m O a y O # M v Q d 0 M 7 O N W p N d O > OJ `m¢ v O > OJ N¢ y > N Q m> M ¢ C (/J OJ m 0 O Sao C N O N a N N Eno O X> O oQo d N d N sL O u rn U vLO m rn U YLO 250 p C L U ' U UU O.iM R m C¢rn m E 3OJ ° ° o IL LM m p N a v m v p _ v . M U = _ w p r y U $ UQ ~ U 9 Y to U m m m a N w m w Q NNK oK amp K o W IL OO m F -oo' ~N tiv ~a °a- m °o m vm MN o cMm o~m oZ 0 m K~« ~2 U NN 'O m L m L m L R CO L r L Q- J Q a N C y N Q O EE°'oNi C O J d N U n U U i w E m v ~ u W Q tM0 (NO O t00 N N G ~n o r 0 h 0 to 0 0 N 0 0 to 0 0 Q 00 CI t0 t0 N l0 N t0 N t0 t0 W O r m r m r m r m r m r m r rn r m r m U Z a W a Wx(!)„ w N d LL O Q a } o W LO ~I ~ m Q N O R W C U 0 v m z a O R ro 7 N N U N Q. ~ U FO v v T N N a N U R 0 N p E z F a d W W G d a d L c d N N c U d a y c ' d U a U y ~ C ~ ~ Z W ~ ml a K c 7 ~s N p' O N _ ~ N mEo a N U C O N as c E m O o - 1O m w aa X U A N m m N Q m° ~ V 3 N 3 U_ 0 O 10 a° a E dm o W O ~ N U ❑ ` O i N .C N O F N OJ N a Y U " Q m a a m o E a _ _ y a ¢ T3 N N N 3 N h> M V a K M m cl a C d a L C ~ m m a a J y ❑ - c N r 0 U 3 a K ~U v~ w E m ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Z a LO u N < m `o o N 0 00 p w O E r r Z w a¢ wm0-- x pa F w N L U. CD = U Lo U U Q O a E W bA S+ ~i 0 E z C~C ~G O a. 0 0. m v N cL m G. O d p E ~ U F O a C N U1 T a N _N d U a. 0 p E z A H NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge CITY COUNCIL on August 24,1998 at 7:00 p.m. at 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. The following petitions shall be heard: Case No. WZ-98-15: An application submitted by Belle, Inc., for approval of an Amendment to Pacifica Development Properties II, LLC, Planned Industrial Development Final Development Plan with a setback variance to allow an additional freeway oriented freestanding sign with a 7' setback variance. Said property is zoned PID, located at 9500 West 491h Avenue and legally described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4, of the SW 1/4 of Section 15, T3S, R69W, of the 6`h P.M. Thence S00-03'22" E, along the east line of said SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4, of the SW 1/4 of Section 15 , a distance of 30.00 feet to the right- of-way of West 49`h Avenue as shown on the recorded plat of Independence Executive Office Park, and also being the point of beginning, thence continuing S00-03'22"E along said east line a distance of 529.62 feet to the northerly right-of-way line of Interstate 70 as recorded in Book 1840, at Page 744 of the records of Jefferson County. Thence N81- 41'13"W along said northerly right-of-way line for Interstate 70 a distance of 605.03 feet to the easterly right-of-way line of Independence Street as shown on the recorded plat of Independence Executive Office Park. Thence along said easterly right-of-way line the following 3 courses: 1. N 45-02'51" W a distance of 45 feet. 2. N 00-02'51" W a distance of 398.12 feet. 3. N 44-57'09" E a distance of 14.10 feet to a point on the south right-of-way of West 49`h Avenue. Thence N 89-47'30" E along said south right-of-way line a distance of 620.36 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 303.601 square feet or 6.9697 acres more or less. Barbara Delgadillo, Recording Secretary ATTEST: Wanda Sang, City Clerk To be Published: Rocky Mountain News Date: August 10, 1998 Q\Barbara\ccRPrswuBNOnc\w29E]5pab.wpd THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN NEWS DENVER,CO PUBLISHER'S AFFIDAVIT City and County of Denver, STATE OF COLORADO, SS. Theresa White being of hwfel age end being first duly sworn .,on oath, deposes sad says: That he/she is the. Legal Advertising Reviewer of The Rocky M...taln News, a daily newspaper of general circulation pahilehed and printed In whole or in pert in Denver. iv the County of Deaver sad State of Colorado, and that said .seeps", we. prior to and daring all the time herl.after mentioned dal, analiDed for the publication of legal notices and advertisements within the meaning of an Act of the General Assembly of the State of Colorado, approved April 7, 1921, as amended sad approved March 30, 1923; sad se amended and approved March 5, 1935, entitled "A. Act concerning Legal Notices, Advertisements and Publicatlo.s and the. feet of printers sad publishers thereof, sad to raped .Ii sets and parts of seta in conflict with the provision of this Act" and amendments thereto: That the notice of which the ..vexed is • true copy, was published in the said .ew.paper to wit: (date. of p.bllcatlou) AUGUST 10, 1998 . C, S(gvatvre Subscribed and sworn to before me this .1 . t h day of. GII $.T A.D63...98... My eommissiov napires -My;ComriT 5SifNr E) 12/1°/2001 Ida May Norton Jim Norton 4360 Marshall St. 4360 Marshall St. Mr. and Mrs. Norton were sworn in by Chair THOMPSON. Mrs. Norton stated that their property did not abut Ms. Emily's property but had a clear view of the property. She stated that she and her husband would like to see the subject property be kept as office use and that no commercial use be allowed down the side street. She also asked that no daycare facility be allowed on the property. She was also in favor of a 6-foot fence behind Ms. Emily's property. Commissioner SNOW asked if Mr. White could envision this property being used for retail. Mr. White replied that he could possibly see something like an antique store, but certainly nothing like a convenience store. Chair_THOMPSON asked if there were other individuals present who wished to address this issue. There was no response. It was moved by Commissioner SNOW and seconded by Commissioner BRINKMAN that Case No. WZ-98-14, a request for approval of a rezoning from Residential-Two to Restricted Commercial-One for property located at 6410 West 44th Avenue, be recommended to the City Council for APPROVAL for the following reasons: 1. There have been significant changes in the neighborhood since prior zoning was established. 2. The plan and rezoning is consistent with both the existing and draft Comprehensive Plan. 3. Parcels to the northwest are zoned Restricted Commercial-One. 4. Minimal impacts are anticipated with the rezoning. With the following conditions: All uses in the Restricted Commercial One zone district be allowed with the exception of preschools and day nurseries. A six-foot screening fence be constructed between the proposed office building and the adjacent residential structure along the south property line to Lamar Street. The existing two-car garage is to be used for required on-site parking spaces only. No additional leasable business space will be permitted within the current garage area. The motion carried by a vote of 5-0 with Commissioner SHOCKLEY abstaining and Commissioners DUNN and GOKEY absent. Commissioner SNOW asked if the applicant was charged for the new application. Mr. White informed the Commission that Ms. Emily was not charged for this application.. B. Case No. W7 X98-15: An application by Bolle, Inc., for approval of an amendment to Pacifica. Development Properties II, LLC, PID Final Development Plan with a setback variance to allow Planning Commission Page 4 08/20/98 an additional freeway-oriented, freestanding sign with a 7-foot setback. The property is zoned PID and located at 9500 West 49th Avenue. This case was presented by Martin Omer. He reviewed the staff report and presented slides and overheads of the subject property. He entered the comprehensive plan, zoning ordinance, case file, packet materials, slides and exhibits into the record which were accepted by Chair THOMPSON: Mr. Ornet stated that the staff report indicated that the square footage of the sign face is 150 square feet when, in fact, the actual size is 137 square feet. He also referred to a letter of concern from the City of Arvada (contained in the staff report), and informed the Commission that after the letter was received, the City of Arvada verbally requested that their letter be withdrawn. In conclusion, he stated that it was staffs recommendation for the application to be approved with conditions as outlined in the staff report. Commissioner SNOW expressed concern about the 45-foot height of the proposed sign and asked if there would be a retail business associated with Bolle's facility as the sign code prohibits signs over 25 feet unless retail is involved. Mr. Omer replied that the applicant would address this issue. Commissioner COLLINS asked about the maximum sign criteria for the Pacifica development. Mr. White replied that there is a maximum of 400 square feet for the entire development. The proposed sign would leave 75 square feet for any additional businesses in the development should Bolle's request be approved. Commissioner BRINKMAN asked what would happen to the existing light pole which provides light for the entryway should the application be approved. Mr. Omer replied that the applicant would address that question. Chair THOMPSON expressed concern about visual impacts which would be placed upon the adjacent apartment units. She was concerned that the sign would shine directly into the windows of those apartments. Mr. Omer stated that notices were sent to the owner of the apartments and there was no response. He noted that no negative response had been received in response to any notices sent out regarding this application. Chair THOMPSON expressed concern about setting a precedent along the I-70 corridor. Mr. Omer replied that he didn't believe there were very many sites in the City of Wheat Ridge with the unique limitations involved in this situation. He also stated that should CDOT make changes to I-70 in this area, the City will want to make sure that economic viability of businesses along the corridor will not be affected. Planning Commission 08/20/98 Mr. White also pointed out that, if this were not a PID, the zoning code would allow a 50-foot tall si;n and, therefore, did not believe there would be a concern with setting a precedent. Commissioner MnDOUGALL asked if all the buildings in the development were occupied. Mr. Orner replied that the applicant plans to address this question. Mr. Orner st ated for the record that he believes Belle is an exceptional new arrival to the City of Wheat Ridge in that it is a well recognized international company, and the suggested condition that provides the sign.tobe removed should Bolle vacate the development, provides some protection to the city. Tom Reed 31398 Tamarisk Lane, Evergreen, CO Mr. Reed was sworn in by Chair THOMPSON. He stated that he is chief financial officer and chief operating officer for Bolle America. He presented a history of his company and stated that the subject facility is the world headquarters for Belle and that the company does $80 million in annual sales. He stated that the requested sign would be extremely beneficial to the company in order to let people know where they are located. He stated that the company plans to lease the only remaining space in the Pacifica Development for a retail outlet; however, such retail space lease would be contingent upon receiving approval of the sign. Commissioner BRINKMAN asked if they planned to maintain the landscaping around the sign. Mr. Reed replied that their company represents a premier product and they have no intention of letting the property look umnaimaitied. BRINKMAN asked about the existing light pole. Mr. Reed showed the drawing of the proposed sign to the Commission pointing out that the light will be mounted on one of the poles of the new sign. Chair THOMPSON asked if the sign could be less than 45 feet in height. Mr. Reed stated that this is the minimum height needed to gain visibility from west-bound 1-70. Commissioner BRINKMAN asked that, if the sign is approved, were there plans to have the Bolle name on the existing monument sign on the west end of the development. Mr. Reed replied that they did not plan to place their name on the sign. He also advised that the colors for the sign have been finally determined to be black and white. Commissioner SHOCKLEY asked if they planned to add any additional signs such as "retail facility on location" to the proposed sign. Mr. Reed replied that there would be no additions to the sign as proposed. Jim Liley 2930 West Ninth Avenue, Denver Mr. Liley was sworn in by Chair THOMPSON. He stated that he has been with the Gordon Planning Commission 08/20/98 Sign Company for the past twenty years. While he expressed appreciation for concerns raised by the Commission regarding the PID, he pointed out that regular zoning would allow a 230- square foot sign based upon Bolle's occupied space. He felt they have complemented existing signs along this corridor and as well as existing signs in the development. In regard to the concern expressed about lighting impact on the adjacent apartments, he stated that only the white "Bolle" letters would be illuminated at night and should not present a hardship to the -tenants: He also noted that notices of the sign application were sent to 156 property owners in the area and he only received one call from a person who did not object to the sign. He also noted that the sign would not be visible to residents to the north. Commissioner SNOW expressed concern about the height of the sign. Luanne Williams 7305 Grandview, Arvada Ms. Williams was sworn in by Chair THOMPSON. She stated that she represented the Northwest Metro Chamber of Commerce and expressed support of the application. She stated that Bolle was also considering locating in the Coors Technology Center in Jefferson count-. but chose the Pacifica location specifically because of the I-70 frontage. Commissioner SNOW again expressed concern about the height of the sign. Mr. White advised the Commission that a separate motion would be required for the variance and would require a super-majority vote. Commissioner BRINKMAN moved and Commissioner SHOCKLEY seconded that Case No. WZ-98-15, an amendment to Final Development Plan for Pacifica Development Properties 11, LLC, Planned Industrial Development Final Development Plan for the erection of one additional freestanding freeway oriented sign, internally lit, with a maximiurn height of 45 feet and a maximum sign face square footage of 137 feet per sign face, for property located at 9500 West 49th Avenue, be recommended for APPROVAL to the Wheat Ridge City Council for the following reasons: 1. A hardship exists to the property associated with this case, being that significant physical constraints limit the visual access of this site compared to other similarly situated and zoned development projects along the highway corridor. 2. The City, property owner and applicant will benefit from approval of this case, which approval is expected to result in the retention of this user at this location with related employment and economic benefits to the City. 3. Approval of the amendment will not change the overall nature, intent or character of the approved PID or the Final Development Plan. Planning Commission Pa.-e 7 08/20/98 Commissioner SNOW commented that she would like to ensure the retail space lease is signed before the sign could be erected. The applicant appeared before the Commission. Ken Darcy 9500 West 49th Avenue Mr. Darcy was sworn in by Chair THOMPSON. He stated that he was vice president and general manager of Bolle. Chair THOMPSON asked Mr. Darcy to address Commissioner SNO W's comment. Mr. Darcy stated that the lease for the retail space is in the process of being finalized but will not be signed unless the company receives approval for the sign. He expressed concern about entering the company into $600,000 debt without the signage necessary to operate from that building. Mr. Reed and Mr. Darcy also pointed out to the Commission that Bolle is a service business and that the 45-foot sign would therefore meet Code requirements for a service or retail oriented business. Commissioner SNOW offered the following amendment: That the requirements of Section 26- 410 E(1) be satisfied prior erection of the sign. The amendment was acceptable to Commissioner BRINKMAN and Commissioner SHOCKLEY. The motion passed by a vote of 6-0, with Commissioners DUNN and GOKEY absent. Commissioner BRINKMAN moved and Commissioner SNOW seconded that Case No. WZ- 98-I5, a setback variance of 23 feet from the 30-foot minimum requirement for the erection of one additional freestanding freeway oriented sign, internally lit, with a maximum height of 45 feet and a maximum sign face square footage of 137 feet per sign face for property located at 9400 West 49th Avenue, be recommended for APPROVAL to the Wheat Ridge City Council for the following reasons: Approval of the variance will not change the overall nature, intent or character of the approved PID of the Final Development Plan. Approval of the variance, along with the Recommended Conditions of Approval, is not expected to cause a substantial negative impact to City services or residents. With the following conditions: 1. Per the Public Works Department, sign placement shall meet the sight distance triangle requirements as specified in the City code. 2. Per the Wheat Ridge Police Department, the solid base of the sign shall be finished with Planning Commission Page 8 08/20/98 an anti-Graffiti sealant. 3. Should the applicant for this case, being Bolle Sunglasses, vacate their administrative offices and future retail operation occurring on this site, the subject sign and associated poles or supports will be completely removed from the premises and that the existing light be restored. Commissioner SNOW commented that she does not agree that the sign should have to be removed upon Bolle's vacation of the property, because any business moving into that space would also need a visible sign. Chair THOMPSON expressed concern that all tenants are treated equally. Following further discussion, Commissioner BRINKMAN amended condition no, 3 to read as follows: "Should the applicant for this case, being Bolle Sunglasses, vacate their administrative offices and future retail operation occurring on this site, the sign would remain and be available to future tenants with the same restrictions to other future users." The motion passed by a vote of 6-0, with Commissioners DUNN and GOKEY absent. (Chair THOMPSON declared a recess at 9:35 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 9:45 p.m.) 8. CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING Chair THOMPSON declared the public hearing portion of the meeting closed. 9. OLD BUSINESS A. Mr. White stated that he discussed the school site selection and construction issue with planning directors of the County who were quite familiar with the problems and shared the same frustrations as the City of Wheat Ridge. 10. NEW BUSINESS A. Commissioner BRINKMAN stated that since she would be unable to attend next Thursday's meeting, she would provide written comments and concerns to be distributed at the meeting for consideration. B. Mr. White announced that a public hearing regarding mass rezoning will be held on September 15, 1998. The Planning Commission hearing will be held October 22, 1998. C. Mr. White suggested holding a 6:00 p.m. dinner meeting on October 1, 1998 for the Planning Commission and the City Attorney to address various planning issues such as Planning Commission Page 9 08/20/98 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission DATE OF MEETING: August 20, 1998 CASE NO. & NAME: WZ-98-15 DATE PREPARED: August 13, 1998 CASE MANAGER: Martin Orner ACTION REQUESTED: Amendment to Final Development Plan Including a Setback Variance for Freestanding Sign Seven Feet From Property Line LOCATION: 9500 West 491" Avenue (Interstate 70 Frontage Road North) APPLICANT(S): Bolle', Inc. OWNER(S): First Industrial Realty 5350 South Roslyn Street Englewood, CO APPROXIMATE AREA: Combined total of approximately 6.97 acres PRESENT ZONING: Planned Industrial Development PRESENT LAND USE: Retail and Commercial SURROUNDING ZONING: North: R-C, Restricted Commercial South: Interstate 70 East: R-3, Residential and PRD, Planned Residential Dev. West: C-1, Commercial One SURROUNDING LAND USE: North: Commercial, and Vacant Land South: Interstate 70 East: Residential West: Offices COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE AREA: Commercial Activity Center - - DATE PUBLISHED: - August 5, 1998 DATE POSTED: August 3, 1998 DATED LEGAL NOTICES SENT: August 3, 1998 • - ENTER INTO RECORD: (X) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) ZONING ORDINANCE (X) SLIDES 0 SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS (X) EXHIBITS Q OTHER JURISDICTION: All notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. &I REQUEST This is an application to amend the existing and approved Pacifica Development Properties 11, LLC Planned Industrial Development Final Development Plan for the erection of one additional freestanding freeway oriented sign, including a setback variance. The sign as proposed will be internally lit, 45 feet high, with a sign face dimension of seven feet by 23 feet 10 inches. The sign is proposed to be oval in shape, which would put the actual square footage calculation at approximately 150 square feet per sign face. The application also includes a request for variance of 23 feet from the minimum 30 setback from property line for an actual setback of seven feet. II SUMMARY On August 11, 1997, the Wheat Ridge City Council approved Case No. WZ-97-10, being the Pacifica Development Properties 11, LLC Planned Industrial Development Final Development Plan. Said PID entitled the developer to construct a 106,524 square foot commercial/industrial project generally adjacent to Interstate 70. As part of the approval, one freeway oriented sign was permitted at a height of 24 feet 11 inches high and a size of 260 square feet per sign face, to be located at the western-most part of the project area, and visible from Interstate 70. Since that time the project has been fully constructed and all buildings in the western half of the project (71,006 square feet) have been occupied, with the eastern-most buildings (35,518 square feet) remaining unoccupied. The southeastern portion of this development remained vacant largely because it is not visible from Interstate 70. This is due to physical limitations of the site relative to the highway as well as the Colorado Department of Transportation's sight obscuring and noise reducing fence located directly in front of this portion of the development only. In July of 1998, the international eye wear company Bolle' moved its North American headquarters and distribution facilities into the majority of remaining building space available in the eastern portion of the site. The applicant has stated that this site was chosen due to its location next to Interstate 70 and the name recognition opportunities available to the traveling public using the highway. The applicant has submitted this amendment and variance case in order to project the corporate image it requires to the traveling public and outdoor enthusiasts traveling I-70. III AMENDMENT TO THE PID AND FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN The eastern portion of the has significant visual limitations and a second sign is proposed for visual identity from the interstate highway for a user with prominent national and international name recognition. A second freeway oriented sign, with interior lighting, to be 45 feet high, with a maximum sign area of 150 square feet per sign face will not create a significant negative impact to surrounding residents, businesses or property owners. Staff also believes the sign face design is simple and easily read, and is therefore not expected to create a hazard to the traveling public or to have negative impacts to safety type issues. IV VARIANCE REVIEW CRITERIA Staff has prepared the following responses to the standard review criteria used to evaluate variance requests: Planning Commission WZ-98-15/Bolle Page 2 6,J , 1. Can the property in question yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located? Yes. If a different tenant had leased the property who didn't need viability from the freeway, the property could yield a reasonable return in use, service or income. Nonetheless, the subject address was not leased by such a different tenant. The subject leasable area is part of an overall Planned Industrial Development for commercial, retail and light industrial uses. It is located on the eastern-most portion of the project area, which has physical limitations significantly impacting the site's visibility from Interstate 70. A sight obscuring and noise reducing fence erected by the State Department of Transportation is located directly in front of this portion of the development only. A major international business concern predominantly catering to outdoor recreational enthusiasts needs visual identity to traffic using Interstate 70 heading to and from the mountains as an essential element of their business needs. Other users would not need such high visibility. Therefore, the subject sign which has been expressly designed for visual identification from Interstate 70, is necessary. The variance itself is to erect the sign seven feet from the project's property line. Since this site is fully developed, no other reasonable locations for the sign are available. 2. Is the plight of the owner due to unique circumstances? Yes. As stated in 1. above, the subject address is considerably lower than the adjacent portion of Interstate 70 and the Department of Transportation's sight obscuring fence. The combination of these elements makes the address invisible from the highway. The site is fully constructed with very limited options of the location of the sign. 3. If the variation were granted, would it alter the essential character of the locality? No. Other freeway oriented signs are located regularly along both sides of Interstate 70. Locating this sign seven feet from the property line is not expected to alter the essential character of the locality. 4. Would the particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved result in a particular hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out? Yes. As stated above, the applicant has located their international business offices and distribution facilities at this location. The physical condition and topography of the site lies below and outside of visual range of Interstate 70 traffic. The proposed location of the sign is the most sensible one available due to the existing parking area, drive areas, landscaping and buildings located on the site. 5. Would the conditions upon which the petition for a variation is based be applicable, generally, to the other property within the same zoning classification? Planning Commission WZ-98-15/Bolle Page 3 3 No. This is a site and use specific variance application. There presently exists a deficit of suitably zoned constructed leasable space along this portion of Interstate 70 with this amount of available square footage for office and industrial uses. This particular location/address meets all the applicant's needs but is greatly impacted by site specific visual limitations to the highway. The site is already fully improved with landscaping, parking, drive areas, and buildings. The proposed location of the sign seven feet from the property line is the most sensible location for this sign. 6. Is the purpose of the variation based exclusively upon a desire to make money out of the property? No. This site is completely constructed per the approved PID and Final Development Plan. Drive areas, parking, buildings and landscaping are all installed. No other reasonable location exists for the erection of the sign, resulting in the variance request of 23 feet the minimum setback in order to erect the sign seven feet from the property line. 7. Has the alleged difficulty or hardship been created by any person presently having an interest in the property? No. The hardship is inherent in the physical aspects of the subject property, and the approved and constructed business/industrial park. 8. Would the granting of the variations be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located? No. The proposed sign location will not be injurious or detrimental to the public welfare and is not expected to pose a hazard to vehicular traffic. The proposed sign does not create significant visual impacts to neighboring residential users. No one from the public attended the neighborhood meeting and no concerns have been received from neighboring landowners and/or users. 9. Would the proposed variation impair the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion in the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. No. The approval of the 23 foot setback variance is not expected to cause any of the negative impacts as listed above. 10. If it is found in criteria 8 and 9 above that granting of the variation would not be detrimental or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood, and it is also found that public health and safety, public facilities and surrounding property values would not be diminished or impaired, then would the granting of the variance result in a benefit or contribution to the neighborhood or the community as distinguished from an individual benefit on the part of the applicant, or would granting of the variance result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities? Planning Commission WZ-98-15Bolle Page 4 6-q ~ Yes. The approval of this application will create an economically viable corporate location for the applicant, which in turn means increased employment opportunities for local residents, and significant overall economic benefits to the community as a whole. VI NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING A neighborhood meeting was held on August 12, 1998. The following persons attended: Thomas Reed, Bolle', Inc. Jim Liley, Gordon Sign Company Martin Omer, City of Wheat Ridge No one from the public or other interested agencies attended this meeting. VII REFERRALS Responding With Concerns: City of Arvada Planning Department In a letter dated August 7, 1998, the Department states that the erection of this sign would not be fair to other tenants on the site. The letter states the Department's opposition to the amendment and the variance. Wheat Ridge Planning Staff Note: The Arvada Planning Department letter does not provide any factual information indicating whether this application would negatively impact the City of Arvada or residents/businesses thereinto support the position of opposition. Wheat Ridge staff called the author of said letter to inquire of any negative impacts to Arvada, but none were provided. City of Wheat Ridge Police Department In a memorandum dated August 8, 1998, the Department recommended that the base of the sign be finished with an anti-graffiti sealant. City of Wheat Ridge Department of Public Works In a memorandum dated August 10, 1998, the Department states that the sign placement shall meet the sight distance triangle requirements specified in the City Code. Responding Without Concerns: Jefferson County Planning Department Arvada Fire Protection District Notified But Not Responding: Public Service Company U.S. West Communications TCI of Colorado Planning Commission WZ-98-15/Bolle Page 5 VIII STAFF CONCLUSION: Planning staff, the applicant and his consultant have met on several occasions to discuss the importance of this overall application to this particular business and the City. Staff believes this application is submitted for valid reason due to inherent physical limitations of the property which severely limit visual access to this particular portion of the development. Staff believes that the additional freeway oriented sign, internally lit, 45 feet high and a maximum of 150 square feet of area per sign face will not create significant negative impacts to nearby residents, and will not create negative impacts to neighboring property owners or businesses. Staff has inspected the site and has concluded that actual locational choices for the sign is restricted to the area chosen by the applicant and that a hardship exists in said locational choices and overall in achieving a visual presence to the traveling public on Interstate 70. Granting a 23 foot variance from the 30 foot minimum setback requirement in order to erect this sign seven feet from the property line will not create negative impacts to the public, neighboring residents, businesses or property owners. The essential character of the PID and the Final Development Plan will not be altered with the approval of the amendment and the variance. Staff recommends approval of this case. IX RECOMMENDED MOTIONS Option A: "I move that Case No. WZ-98-15, Amendment to Final Development Plan for Pacifica Development Properties 11, LLC, Planned Industrial Development Final Development Plan including a setback variance of 23 feet from the 30 foot minimum requirement, for the erection of one additional freestanding freeway oriented sign, internally lit, with a maximum height of 45 feet and a maximum sign face square footage of 150 feet per sign face, for property located at 9500 West 49`h Avenue, be recommended for APPROVAL to the Wheat Ridge City Council for the following reasons: 1. Approval of the amendment and variance, along with the Recommended Conditions of Approval, is not expected to cause a substantial negative impact to City services or residents. 2. Approval of the amendment and variance will not change the overall nature, intent or character of the approved PID or the Final Development Plan. 3. A hardship exists to the property associated with this case, being that significant physical constraints limit the visual access of this site compared to other similarly situated and zoned development projects along the highway corridor. The City, property owner and applicant will benefit from the approval of this case, which approval is expected to result in the retention of this user at this location with related employment and economic benefits to the City. Approval of the amendment and associated variance is subject to the following conditions: Per the Public Works Department, sign placement shall meet the sight distance triangle requirements as specified in the City code. Planning Commission WZ-98-15Bolle Page 6 j5.'lo 2. Per the Police Department, the solid base of the sign shall be finished with an anti-graffiti sealant. Should the applicant for this case, being Bolle' Sunglasses, vacate their administrative office and/or any future retail operation occurring on this site, the subject sign and associated poles or supports will be completely removed from the premises. Option B: "I move that Case No. WZ-98-15, Amendment to Final Development Plan for Pacifica Development Properties 11, LLC, Planned Industrial Development Final Development Plan including a setback variance of 23 feet from the 30 foot minimum requirement, for the erection of one additional freestanding freeway oriented sign with a maximum height of 45 feet and a maximum sign face square footage of 150 feet per sign face, for property located at 9500 West 491h Avenue, be recommended for DENIAL to the Wheat Ridge City Council for the following reasons: Approval of the amendment and variance will cause a substantial negative impact to City services or residents. 2. Approval of the amendment and variance is not in conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan designation for the area. Approval of the amendment and variance will result in a PID and Final Development Plan not similar to that previously approved by the City Council. 4. No hardship to the property has been demonstrated." E:\Planning\REPORTSFwz-98-1 S wpd Planning Commission WZ-98-15/Bolle Page 7 Z- AMENDMENT #1 FOR A FREESTANDING SIGN WITH A SETBACK VARIANCE PACIFICA DEVELOPMENT PROPERTIES 11, LLC PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN We are requesting this amendment to allow an additional freestanding sign to the original development plan with a setback variance. The proposed Bolle sign would be 168 sq. feet per face in area and would be mounted 45' above grade with a 7' setback from the property line. The proposed sign would be mounted on rectangular tubes with textured pole covers painted white to match the buildings. The oval background would be aluminum with illuminated Bolle' letters. The size and height of the proposed freestanding sign would be compatible with the sign code for freestanding signs in non-residential districts for businesses located within one-quarter (1/4) mile of 1-70. The sign code states: Two freestanding signs per development (one per street front) are permitted with one sign up to 50' high. Based on Bolle's 29,000 sq. ft buildings, the sign code would permit a 230 sq. ft. sign. Our request for a setback of 7' rather than the required 30' setback is necessary due to the 10' barrier fence along 1-70 which impacts the visibility for westbound traffic. A 30' setback would also place the sign in the middle of the parking lot. E FIRST INDUSTRIAL July 31, 1998 Mr. Tom Reed Bolle' Wheat Ridge, Colorado Dear Tom: FIRST INDUSTRIAL REALTY TRUST, INC. 5350 South Roslyn Street Suite 240 Englewood, Colorado 80111 303/220-5565 Fax 303/220-5585 This letter shall serve to confirm in writing that Bolle' is submitting a pole sign application to the City of Wheat Ridge with the knowledge and consent of First Industrial Realty, Inc., owner of the project. Sincerely, 7ein DUST RIINC. . Smith, SIOR Leasing Representative SWS:djb State of Colorado County of Arapahoe The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on the 31-'2' day of 99o' , by z ~GJ. )-4, ao of WITNESS my hand and official seal. N6~d*, L -e. Notary Public My Commission Expires: ©Y-M-®O fAhomApm ndRtt m \f lte.lo-.don 4 MEMORANDJM A proved Date DEPARTA=OPPU UCWORKS TO: Martin Omer, Economic Development Coordin FROM: Greg Knudson, Development Review Engineer DATE: August 10, 1998 SUBJECT: 9500 West 491h Avenue, WZ-98-15 The Public Works Department has reviewed the Planning Department referral dated August 5, 1998 for the above referenced site, and has the following comments: 1. Sign placement shall meet the sight distance triangle requirements as specified in the City code. cc: Alan White, Planning & Development Director Dave Kotecki, Sr. Project Engineer Steve Nguyen, Traffic Engineer File f--1t) MEMORANDUM TO Martin Omer Planning and Development FROM Deri Patt Police Department SUBJECT Case No: WZ-98-15 9800 W. 49 Avenue DATE August 8, 1998 I have reviewed the plans for the above listed site. I have the following recommendations: 1. The solid base of the sign be finished with an anti-graffiti sealant. This will allow easier of clean-up of any paint, marker, etc. that may be placed on the support posts. From these plans, I have no further recommendations at this time. Revisions in the plans, may alter my recommendations. While my recommendations do not guarantee a crime-free environment, it has been experienced that application of the concept of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) will reduce the opportunity for crime to occur and will enhance the quality of life. Thank you. Deri Z-/I TY OF AV A T vv PLANNING DEPARTMENT 303 431-3020 PHONE ♦ 303 431-3969 FACSIMILE TDD: 303 431-3917 August 7, 1998 Martin Omer Department of Planning and Zoning City of Wheat Ridge 7500 West 29 n Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Dear Mr. Omer, RE: Case No. WZ-98-15 R~~EIVE© The City of Arvada Planning Department has received your referral for a sign variance at 9500 West 49" Avenue. The request is for a second freestanding freeway oriented sign for a tenant in the I-70 West Business Park. Information provided to us for review did not include any statements as to the hardship or practical difficulty associated with this request. Under "Character of Development" on the I-70 West Business Park Final Development Plan (FDP), it states that "The development is designed for commercial uses. The concept is to provide flexible space that can accommodate a variety of tenants". It is the opinion of the Arvada Planning Staff that the granting of a variance for a second freeway sign for an individual tenant is this business park would be unfair to all of the other tenants, located there. The Arvada Sign Code permits signs of this size and height for a single user building that is 300,000 square feet in size and located next to a interstate highway. Therefore, we would be opposed to this amendment to the FDP and setback variance. If you have any questions concerning the above comments, do not hesitate to give me a call at 431-3020. 8101 RALSTON ROAD A P.O. BOX 8101 ♦ ARVADA, COLORADO A 80001-8101 6T- EXISTING SIGN i 10b' STRUCTURE (VERIFY) PANEL - 6'O' TENANT PANEL (VERIFY) I i I-~ - 14V TITLE CABMET WIDTH 10-12' STRUCTURE (VERIFY) H 4'8' T1V JI M ~,j ` 11 SIGN FEED ASAGREED -2' - WITH BL KEF KARD 1'9' Tg - . 2' 12' PLATED STUD ANCHORS 3' INTO STRUCTURE ALL EQUAL FUTURETENANT (EIGHT PER SIDE) P I17`SB f{7 ANFt - ONF Df) IPl F FA[~tt SIC,N - .050 ALUMINUM CABINET - PAINT TEAL BLUE - - YRETAINERS AND 2' AUJI.1t " T-BARS PAINT TEAL GREEN - 2X ' X 3/18' ANGLE FRAME PAINTED - 9/18' WHITE TUFFAC FACES PAINT FIELD OPAQUE TEAL GREEN - FUTURE TENANT COPY TO BE TRANSLUCENT WHITE - 80XMAAT-121U.UACNAT10N. U.L SPECIFICATIONS - 2" VOLT W1RWG - 10 AMPS . ALIGN BOTTOM FOUR DIVIDER BARS WITH STRUCTURE DETAIL <-STRUCTURE BY OTHERS..... FIELD VERIFY ALL MEASUREMENTS 1. '•-E--Ce,rMR TO CENTER FEED ELEVATION ONE REQUIRED SCALE: tµ1.110' DESIGN / SHEET DATE 2-17-97 REVISION 4-1-97 ,6-13 aF WHEAT LAND US. CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION of WHEAT ti o ~ o Planning and Development Department 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Phone (303) 235-2846 °otoRnoo (Please print or type all information) Applicant Tom Reed, Bolle, Inc. Address 9500 W. 49th, Unit B Phone 327-2200 City Meat Ridge, CO 80033 Owner First Industrial L.P. Address5350 South Roslyn St., Ste. 240 phone 220-5565 City Englewood, CO 80111 Location of request (address) 9500 W. 49th, Unit- B. ~ffipat Ridge, CO Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions liste d below which pertain to your request.) Change of zone or zone conditions Variance / Waiver ❑ Site development plan approval] Nonconforming use change ❑ Special Use Permit ❑ Flood plain special exception ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Interpretation of Code ❑ Temporary Use, Buildings, Signs ❑ Lot line Adjustment ❑ Minor Subdivision (5 lots or less) ❑ Planned Building Group ❑ Subdivision (More than 5 lots) ❑ Street Vacation ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final Other: Amendmentto Pacifica Developme Detailed description of the request: see attached Properties L1, LLC Planned Industrial setback variance. Fill out the following information to the best of your knowledge. Current Zoning: PID Size of Lot (acres or square footage): 303.619 . ft. Current use: Light industrial, retail, office Proposed use: Same Assessors Parcel Number: I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above, without whose cons uested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners must submit po faaxl~} m the owner which a d of this action on his behalf. ~ Signature of A liC~ft2 Y GOO .4c'Er Ro~ E yN.G. nGl ~Q Subscribed a d swor to this day of, 19 \G: ~ o UuUUU m~A APO FOF coyp4 o ry Public My commission expires i Date received - Receipt No. Case No. 102-1'2 to, S- ( Related Case No. Zoning L n Quarter Section Mapw r S -I q 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE August 3, 1998 Dear Property Owner: WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80215 Thv City of ~~OF WHEgr Wheat ~cm GRidge C,Ot O R A00 This is to inform you that Case No. WZ-98-15 which is a request for approval of an Amendment to Pacifica Development Properties II, LLC, Planned Industrial Development Final Development Plan with a setback variance to allow an additional freeway oriented freestanding sign with a 7' setback variance. Said property is zoned PID, located at 9500 West 49°i Avenue, and will be heard by the Wheat Ridge Planning Commission in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue. The meeting will be held on August 20, 1998 at 7:30 p.m. All owners and/or their legal counsel of the parcel under consideration must be present at this hearing. As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to notify any other persons whose presence is desired at this hearing. If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2846. Thank you. Planning Division. C:\Barbara\CCRPTS\PUBNOTIC\wz9815 certletter. wpd (303) 234-5900 • ADMINISTRATION FAX: 234-5924 POLICE DEPARTMENT FAX: 235-2949 a d v a a 22 c O N N C ` 'V y ` a M N a a) L ¢ W 0 J J ~ a K rv ` L o Z w ? mi ~ m L l I I d ~ ~ j O N = a1 aEo a U U 0 L O N am C E.1.0 N a U N N N N N N N N N N (a X_ '.k N U1 al U O N O N m N O N O N a7 N W N O) N O) N ¢ m° ~ 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 U _ ~ VI O M p M O M M O N M m M ~ O NM # O r M OM N M O O t M O M M O OM M O OM M O O C m O O ~m V N QJ # O m O vom # O _m # O ~ .m # O .m # O a _m v m coa in0 ur ~aci0 w mai 00 mZ0 m0O E00 r00 1 >o 0U 0 O XO o<U M ;o a¢U '>°¢U ¢U ° a~¢U 92 ¢ O m 01 m -p L d > L 65 L ° .L. ry V y a ¢ a E m O N N O N _ O a_ 0 C V O a) E N~ p C Y. ~ ' d y d JoK ns~E ~ E ❑ L K 02 o K K m d ~a o-v_ V ' cNOm ~m a2, ' L ~ C ~ M L O L ~ W (n V L m t Q L. m V L rn V' L m V m C Q m 3 N v J o N 00 r~~ n U 0 W E m ar to Y ~ m m r m N V W Q N N N O 6 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 0- N 0 N 0 OD 0 r r r r r n r n r r n r n m m n m m rn m rn rn m W O E U Z W Q W N ~ ~ ~ Q a O W N O Z m Una c a v v R a R ` c R x N C 'U d a ~ a i - 'm o y : a K ° R C Z > RI d 0.' C I I I 0.' > 0.' N m o N~ .r - R . O E a E a 0 m t 0 R O p E .O.0 R _ N y a a UI N W N 01 N m N aD N OJ N c0 N N N M N W x_ U R R R R U m N m N m N m N m N m N m N m N rn N ¢ R° ~ 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 v 0 O _ N a ' r M [p M M OJ M M M _ N M R N M O ~ O Yk° ~ ~ ° O ro M O p~ ° T y ~ RO M O ~m R ~ NNO M O #O G m m m - o p ~ m ` N E >O >>O Nm R RNO >o R o wiO Oc0 ` =>O U R ¢ U U _ ~o N U Y o U ¢ U R m 0 r 3¢ U m U c¢ .y N a S L L m m C C 01 OI O ~j N= N N m Y L N R m m O Y i C, L N m O- 1 Y a0 N L N L 01 W a 6 V -O R V a R R E N 'O_ R V' U R ~ry V i2 ~ U) 0 6 V O vv ov o~ NZ ¢ and a~z ¢ om tern N °R 0 R R '6 N -p RL~ a a N L rn~ N L rn~ L ~ N L rn~ .d. L m3 w O N L rn~ C y N N 0. E w ¢ _ Q L E N N 2 N ~ r p J a) wo LL ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ R Z R U w P Q M ° O O O O O O fV ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ CO r r r r n n r r r n r n r n O £ r m n m r m n m rn m m m m U H > z' W¢w O = F D LL N O Q n o W H o = U LO ~I Q d O a W aq c j U ~i O O E R z N tC O a. 0 w ro N U 0. W 0 v z z y U H N T p a0+ r] U 0. 0 9 E z 0 F a R N C N ~ R a R C R y N C ` U R J d ° R U d ~ a ~ R ~ Z ? RI -R v K c KI I > ~ R `0 07 N ~ N N y w - d . O a y E E u a N L 0 R ° a c w.2 R - # LO N N _ N N a a N N W N OJ N W W t0 N X U R y N N U O) N O) N O) N W N Q) N N O) N D7 N O) N Q R° r 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 U _ O N O O. (O t"1 M O N M N N N ~O ! ~ O M O M N O O M N O CC C #O h C RO #O N Q N N N O . ~ N N# ~OJ V~ O N `m E~°o R aio v m° O E °J O OJ RN and ° N d y E m~ L y O cL Q U L L W O j C! O Q U Eco N R O a R C R O U! O C Q U m L L U O! U Q u! Q U _ fn L . R R.L 0 N r~ f6 !~L R ~ Ctp .N. ~U NL R N O O SOU = R, N R KL R R 9 . Lva Una Z`J m0 o mrnv T~ daa TIM y m ~ R n`~ c N n m a ~ Z LL m m ° r m ~ ~~s ~o y o R ~ U° v d a ~ V ~ L ' ° t Q v rn~ M 'U R ~ V L m~ m V L m~ L rn~ O ~ a R ~ v rn~ d C y N m~ ° N Q - D ""ERN WO d' a R K ~ O c~ O~ uw E R R N r 4 0 0 0 °0 0 0 0 0 W O `0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 N 10 N N N N YJ h R N m m m m m rn m m m O E H ; U z' Q Q W W 0 O N 0 3: Q a O W ~ti~ ~I c a v m `w ~ v a ~ U N N E C ` U d ` a a v c O U c o Z m ? vi ~ m a K c 7 a a N O O N ~ N N .r - m : . O E a 0 E a ~ o L o m na c E.0 N - ` # ~O Vl ~O N N ~O N N N o N N "O N M OJ W OJ W N M N OJ x_ o A N O m U m N m N m N m N m N m N m N rn N m N ¢ N .Or 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 U _ 0 O • N O C a O M M N N M M M M M N > O U ~ I~ M M N M O M M O O p~ E C m # O N # O ~ O ¢ N G N # 0 O# O O O 0 a w o ZO N 0 F- 00 ' E U) °J 0 N o 0 O 000 o 000 d N o R Q U Y ) -.0 O m a U i a O U Q U m T C O a O 'd ¢ U N¢ U C¢ U N _ m L O N U 'O L N (A v N F OI U O U W L O C O fO L O a a N O O] -O '6 a O O) Ol L , a C Ol Ol V - N _ 'O > C - d' a O O) 0) V t U T O> OI V "O I W C "O O ¢ N o d V O O > O O O _ IY d O N ¢ N N J m > O O 3 Dm K ~3 m N IY Y~ m N o~ m OM N 3 a O LL A CL 3 m m Y L ~2. R -6 :o _ v o s o o 01 o y V N cm w a v t m v s c t 0 N v t ro . c ro L L~2 ' 'LS -p . I ' 0 > w> J > m> W ~ 0 ° J > OMi> rn~ > m> O M N y 2 N S ¢ u i Q C N N 2 0 U~'0 a' w U U iw E ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ N Z m N U_ r W Y ¢ m m m m m m m 0 ro 0 m 0 N CD C o O 0 o 0 O 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ r f _ N ~O t0 Y1 ~O rn t rn ~O m N rn ~O m ~ rn Q_' W E m m rn . Z Q Q W W 0 LL N o R: F- O = y ~LID ~ ~I . C d N ~ 3 d 9 d U C d N c U d a ~ a m u d ~ a o c Z d ? dl ~ v ad' c ~ ~s d 0 N O) O Y N C N N ~Eo 0 a v 0 U L O N O -O C E 1.0 . m `t ~ t0 N i0 ~O ~O V1 ~O i0 N C 'O = d 'O d N W of N W ~N W W X U m `•k d m U O] N O) N N D1 N O) N O) N O) N N W N N ¢ m° ~ 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 U_ N O ~ G a . IA ('J O M M M O M r M O M ~ (O M O O ' M O G O m N do m m f o aTi#om ° ro U M > o w o ` - c n o v ° o o ° En °s o d d N m 8N m>O m>O a>o 9 U o ao ' a>O o U _w >O ¢U ro o d ~n 0 o¢U w¢U ¢ ~ U EO ¢ tq x0 > W L ~ a0 r N 9 °s d U U ti L ro r - d m °0 m(0 yL y m a 0 0 R1 6 m rn 0 m Q m m rn m m ~rn o E c m " m c m vo m 3 - c mvc O El m d d d vi d d N fn N O K O d' O M O m O N Z .C [Y > O O O 2 d Z > W > o7 a m V {a _2 6 'O _ V d C ' N ` ¢ N O Z O t O d ¢ d m ¢ O d N j > I~ ¢ _ m ' d L ~ 'O OJ ~ N > W OJ L D7 ~ ~ L O) ~ L ~ Y Q G N N d~ ~ N Q 01 > a aO ~U U0 0x E m d N r O t 10 V M N O O) OJ r LU N Q ion .on h ~ 00 0 0 r 0 r 0 r 0 r 0 r 0 r 0 r 0 r 0 r ~ _ d t0 N ~O t(l Yl m N m t0 rn N m ~ rn R' O E rn m m m H > U z' QQ W N o Q a H o S d too ~I Q N O 0. [xEl j 0 d E m z 0 0. Ow m J U d U 0. w 0 `v E 7 zd ^m U F- O a c d d d a 0 9 0 z H d N d d a d ~ c d N N C U d a N Q ~ 'O y c „ d U u L ~ K o A ` c Z w ~ dl ~ d K N c t K i K N O N C N N .F - W . O E a 0 a U 0 L O t0 0_'O C O d, A # ~O ~O ~O N ~O t0 i0 ~O 40 U N a R W T O O X_ `.K N d N N N N N N i O N O J N N ¢ A° S 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 U _ 0 O ~ N C ICO 0. ~ M U ~ O ` M N M O M F m C W A # _ O C Q j N A# O i k O : F# O C O "O O Q C O E <W w '0 O dO w U M (A A > OJ v Q O ` d d "O C N 0 0 ' N A d O U gO U M ' d O L O 0 w Q> U ~j > Q U O a C L .L.. U O~ O 0 O O u `O O d Q d L D O O N U R L U L O CI V d ' V (nOO y N V Y O N W d L U U "O u Qj m O I d d O) m y O "O O O) E "O C ' C C "O y 9 Y V ~ E U A O A V 'O_ "O V 9 O L> A C d d A O d Y w Q _ L) R o 3 0- K W Y 3 ,o K w a> 3 ° _ _N m ¢-6 m 2 U n s ~ m o aAi A N -x o rn O) m N U)0 ~o d - 0~ U A A E! .O M L Q C J o 01 ,L M L Q M C W L O> W N A J "O d L 9 0) N m m m C w N N° N Q N Q E d Pw) 16 m w o ~ 0 ° d U~LLW E ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ A z d N T W t: Q (p o N 0 V 0 M 0 N 0 0` O 0 O) 0 OJ 0 N ` o o o o 0 W o n n ^ n r r r r r n r r r ~ W O E m m rn m m rn m m m V Z Q Q W N O 3: Q a } 0 W Cl 3: 0 O a. 8 oA j O E A z G~ y O. O a m a 7 N ~i U N Q. k O p z~ ~w a a m U 0.. 0 z F D ~ -pf ` c a ~ u a y U c y N C d U ` J y a v u y ~ a K o m ~ Z ~ NI m R' C D D l K ~ j d _ `o u N OO r W _ R N R E ° a R u L a ~ aD 0 E 1.0 . N N N N ~ry D x R a N rn w rn rn m m m m m _ U N R R U N N N N N N N N 3 N 3 ¢ R°~ 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 u O in ~ o M y N D C M O M O M O M O t O ~ ti i O M N M N V O m > N N Q > W Q > N Q Q] > OJ Q C R R O r d O N O N R V R" E (n O x> O O Q O N N N L Y O u 0 a O mrnU Y L O m0 L O mU U 00 O. wL. °i C Q m m E 3 (O ° ° LL L O] rnp N ` D m v m O m Y p 6 OM 6 O F- rU L g°~ O -o mU ~ ~U y y 'c Z2m Z`~a ~ m2a o~:o u Ra ~ U EN o o t R d~v y U l y a R O m O a O O x p0j W O m ° O r N H~° Uj U N R LL V N .°.°--a - ` Sv v m v m m M t6 o ~ M A W D m c R m u~a M _ U N R W L O) L 47 L R N L L O Q ~ V J Q ~ - D 2i j ~ Nt Oi u C N N a 6 y .F E N N J N O U n C ~ LL W ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ R z N LO t LLJ U_ 't' ¢ r o f0 0 ~O 0 r ° V o M o N o 0 O 0 N O o u> a o o o 0 0 co °r ° °r 0 n ^ n n n m n n n O E m m rn m m m rn rn m I- > U z' W Q W N 0 3: Q a O W Una ~I a v N c v K y tj ~ N C ~ U d J y a ~ y c d U n K o R c z ? wi K c •d a a ~o m N ~ 0 w w G N _ . N o E a NEo a N o 'c om o a c w.2 ME ~ m a ~ m `w x N U m m Q m° mE 3 3 U_ 0 O ° m a C Nw > N a o d' N 0 N N N n m H N w N 0 c w o c 2` O N 9 Y U- m m U y ~ a .o Q m o E o ~i Ea o w d iJ N N N In N U1 ~ c Z w U V (D m v M p U1 NL~ a U N m a Q J N Q 0 c O U i w E rs d LO u W N a o m C9 ~ o o 0 Q 00 m m _ / O m E m m H j U z' aau, W=0 N o 3: Q a O W Q N T 0 a W on C 0 E z 0 0... ro > N a' m v O E ~ U F O a v T ti d U a 0 a E z m 0 < 7 Q Co vJ Z c1 l 5~" ell JEFFERSON COUNTY HOUSING A LOUIS J. FICCO )365 US J. FIC 3650 VANCE ST #1 V E ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-6296 RIDGE CO 80033-6293 w LOUIS F JAIME J. JONES- DAN J. TAYLOR 3650 E ST #1 9340, W 49TH AV #210 - PO BOX 632 0 80033-6296 (WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-2272 EVERGREEN CO 80437-0632 T RI EC STEPHEN E. RODRIGUEZ CHARLES H. MAHER DONALD L PRATT 92240W 49TH AVE #301 PG-BOX -f 502 9240 W 49TH AVE #303 /WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-6721 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80034-1502 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-6721 A WRIGHT 4FEL DEWILD MES R. WARNER Y M. W 9240 W 49TH AVE #304 9240 W 49TH AVE #305 9240 W 49TH AVE #306 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-6721 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-6721 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-6721 JOSEP. HEIMILLER JEANN G. HULL SARK-S-.-ROSS 924 49TH AVE #307 9240 W 49TH AVE #308 12926 W 61 ST CIR WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-6721 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-6721 ARVADA CO 80004-3966 JAMES A. KLEIN j PAMELA S. KENNEDY ATRICK D. MERSHON 4555 HOYT ST 9240 W 49TH AVE #311 11169 W 68TH WAY WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-2923 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-6722 ARVADA CO 80004-2508 MARY JANE DUSEK HORTENAU CHARLES VON STEPHEN T. HART 9240 W 49TH AVE #313 6171 S KEARNEY ST 9240 W 49TH AVE #315 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-6722 ENGLEWOOD CO 80111-4234 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-6722 MICHAEL R. MILLER FRANCIS B. OSCHMANN OE ARLES VON 9240 W 49TH AVE #316 8348 W 75TH WAY NEY ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-6722 ARVADA CO 80005-4532 0 CO 80111-4234 CWALINA JILL K GARY A. WERLE L. PETERS JAMES 9340 W 49TH AVE #202 1435 W WINNEMAG AVE 1940 GARLAND ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-2272 CHICAGO IL 60640-2816 LAKEWOOD CO 80215-2973 JOHN M. BRANCUCCI RILEY MEEHAN CHARLENE S. HOFFMAN 9340 W 49TH AVE #205 980 W 100TH PL 9340 W 49TH AVE #207 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-2272 DENVER CO 80221-6296 -WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-2272 JEFFREY P. RATHMAN L. PET RS ES LISA BLKfZ 9340 W 49TH AVE #208 / 1940 G ND ST 9340 W 49TH AVE #210 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033- 72 LA 0 CO 80215-2973 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-2272 DAVID ALAN JACKSON RICHARD W. BELL KAREN D. SCHECK 1940 GARLAND ST 9340 W 49TH AVE #212 9340 W 49TH AVE #213 LAKEWOOD CO 80215-2973 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-2273 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-2273 DAVID A. THYFAULT DAVID A. HY ULT DONALDSON INVESTMENT CO 5011 W WAGON TRAIL AV 5011 W ON TRAIL AVE 811 REED ST LITTLETON CO 80123-1572 LITTL ON C 80123-1572 LAKEWOOD CO 80215-6119 FLOYD ESPINOZA HORTE A NGAVON KAROLYN LANOUE 9340 W 49TH AVE #217 6171 S RNEY ST 9380 W 49TH AVE #102 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-2273 ENG O D CO 80111-4234 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-2275 RUBEN SANDOVAL STEPHEN G. SCOTT RUTH M. COWAN 9380 W 49TH AVE #103 5285 TABOR ST 9380 W 49TH AVE #105 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-2275 ARVADA CO 80002-1909 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-2275 ROBERT E. EVANS JUDITH K. PIPPIN THOMAS WARD GREEN 9380 W 49TH AVE #106 9380 W 49TH AVE #107 5882 VAN GORDON ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-2275 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-2275 ARVADA CO 80004-4256 MEHRAN SOWDAEY HOWARD N. SCHIFF AULT DAV W 49TH AVE #109 9380 PO BOX 1390 X 5011 ON TRAIL AV WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-2275 ARVADA CO 80001-1390 LITTO 80123-1572 JOAN V. EVANS WALDEMAR BOROWIEC RICK KEENAN 9380 W 49TH AVE #112 7148 W 74TH AVE 9380 W 49TH AVE #114 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-2276 ARVADA CO 80003-3062 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-2276 JAMES ROCK JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY CENTER MOHAMAD M. SAKA 8474 CHASE DR 7456 W 5TH AVE 9380 W 49TH AVE #117 ARVADA CO 80003-1200 LAKEWOOD CO 80226-1615 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-2276 FREDERIC ALDEN WOLL ARKA KIPLING PACIFICA ARK>KL P IFI 9380 W 49TH AVE #118 5350 S ROSLYN ST #240 5350 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-2276 ENGLEWOOD CO 80111-2123 ENG1-2123 RICHARD R. WHITE WILLIAM L. ROGERS ROBERT L. STAFFORD 9595 W 49TH AVE 4400 S INDEPENDENCE TR 2500 VAN GORDON ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-2279 EVERGREEN CO 80439-5814 LAKEWOOD CO 80215-1014 ROBERT STAFFORD HARRY RICHNER MARY LOU DANIELS 2500 V RDON ST 9445 W 49TH AVE 9415 W 49TH AVE LAKE OOD 80215-1014 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-2277 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-2277 PAUL F. KIRK LUTHERAN MEDICAL OFFICE BU ILDING INC 70 EXECUTIVE CENTER 9395 W 49TH AVE 8300 W 38TH AVE 4891 INDEPENDENCE ST #160 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-2235 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-6005 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033-6713 ELVIS H. TIPPETS TOM MARTINEZ RICHARD P. SOMMA 10600 W 79TH PL 675 29TH AVE 8455 S YARROW ST ARVADA CO 80005-3613 SAN MATEO CA 94403-3254 LITTLETON CO 80128-6140 FREDERICK M. FOX 8545 W 59TH AVE ARVADA CO 80004-5496 GERALD NEUMANN TRUS ROBERT 3858 PERRY ST DENVER CO 80212-2147 RASMAJ.KRABACHER. 13455 W CENTER DR LAKEWOOD CO 80228-2451 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge PLANNING COMMISSION on August 20,1998 at 7:30 p.m. at 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. The following petitions shall be heard: Vase No. WZ-98-15: An application submitted by Bolle, Inc., for approval of an Amendment to Pacifica Development Properties II, LLC, Planned Industrial Development Final Development Plan with a setback variance to allow an additional freeway oriented freestanding sign with a 7' setback variance. Said property is zoned PID, located at 9500 West 49" Avenue and legally described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4, of the SW 1/4 of Section 15, T3S, R69W, of the 6th P.M. Thence S00-03'22" E, along the east line of said SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4, of the SW 1/4 of Section 15 , a distance of 30.00 feet to the right- of-way of West 49" Avenue as shown on the recorded plat of Independence Executive Office Park, and also being the point of beginning, thence continuing S00-03'22"E along said east line a distance of 529.62 feet to the northerly right-of-way line of Interstate 70 as recorded in Book 1840, at Page 744 of the records of Jefferson County. Thence N81- 41' 13"W along said northerly right-of-way line for Interstate 70 a distance of 605.03 feet to the easterly right-of-way line of Independence Street as shown on the recorded plat of Independence Executive Office Park. Thence along said easterly right-of-way line the following 3 courses: 1. N 45-02'51" W a distance of 45 feet. 2. N 00-02'51" W a distance of 398.12 feet. 3. N 44-57'09" E a distance of 14.10 feet to a point on the south right-of-way of West 49" Avenue. Thence N 89-47'30" E along said south right-of-way line a distance of 620.36 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 303.601 square feet or 6.9697 acres more or less. I /1 <vL~i~c.~a ~ 1)-~K f~ ..fir ,(!mot v. Barbara Delgadillo, Rec ing Secretary ATTEST Wanda Sang, City lerk To be Published: Rocky Mountain News Date: August 5, 1998 C:\Barbara\PCRPTS\PLANGCOM\PUBHRG\wz9815pub.wpd THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN NEWS DENVER, CO PUBLISRER'S AFFIDAVIT City and County of Denver, STATE OF COLORADO, SS. Theresa White being of tawfal age and being first duly sworn also. oath, deposes and says: That he/she is the,Legal Advertising Reviewer of The Rocky M...tain News, • dally .ewspaper of geuaral drcaLNon pubiiahed and printed 1. whole or I. part 1. Denver, I. the Duty of Denver and State of Colorado, and that said newspaper was prior to and during all the time herindter mentioned dolly qualified for the publication of legal notices and advertisements within the meaning of a. Act of the General Assembly of the State of Colorado, approved April 7, 1921. as amended sad approved March 30. 1923: aad as amended and approved March 5, 1935, ..titled "An Act concerning Legal Notices. Advertisements and Publications and the fen of printers and publishers thereof, and to repeal all acts and parts of acts in ...flict with the provision of this Act" and amendments thereto: That the notice of which the avnesed I. a tree copy, was published in the said newspaper to wit: (dates of publicatloo) ASIGAS.~..S~.. 1 9 8 Signature Subscribed and swore to before me this ..5th, day A.D~/ 08 N tary Pv611o. My commission expires My Co ~n~On-ExPim 11'~J 12/18/2001 Ft a 'AA /A'D AUG 19 '98 07:26 FROM GORDON SIGN CO 0 Gordon Sign Company August 18, 1998 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE ATTN: Martin Omer 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wfteat Ridge, Colorado 80033 RE Bolle Administrative Amendment TO 2352857 Mr. Mr. Omer: The square footage of the proposed 168 square foot `BOLLE' sign was 0010 ated by multi*ft the ovemn height of r by the 24' length. We discussed and agreed a more accurate measurement would be appropriate. The actual area of the proposed oval would be 137 square feet If you have any other questions, please call me. Sincerely. Jamey Senior Account ecutive JUcdk GORDON SIGN COMPANY ACOF~Canprry P.O.BOX40311 oFfiYH F 80jQ6 {lt pX 82?102A 2120 NAEGELE ROAD COLOPADO SPWN&S. OOLOPADO WON (719)633.7789 FAXMO)6 3550 PAGE. 002.'002 1r31 N. EAM SIREET PUEBLO. COLCFL 0W 8 001 (719)563-7w FAX (719) 563,W7 TOTAL PRGE.002 AUG 19 '98 07:25 FROM GORDON SIGN CO F" TRWSM11TAL 1 Pages to follow TO: Martin Omer COMPANY: CITY OF WHEAT RIOGE FROM: Jim Liley DATE: August 19. 1998 RE Bolls Administrative Amendment MESSAGE TO 2352857 PAGE.001i002 ~~1I~a qW Gordon Sign A VW.AW PmckjM CarpsM 2930 W. 9th Avemie Dt , CO 80204 303 6294 211 303429-1024 FAX FAX NUMBER: a25SiZd&-7 Per Attached i 4 lS <3~ C 8/t//~~.trr c (/Ga' ~l~ Si ylt 46 Uz w~~ a Zo Z C /F / 1~TiAJ MEMORANDUM I Approved Date DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TO: Martin Omer, Economic Development Coordin FROM: Greg Knudson, Development Review Engineer DATE: August 10, 1998 SUBJECT: 9500 West 49"' Avenue, WZ-98-15 The Public Works Department has reviewed the Planning Department referral dated August 5, 1998 for the above referenced site, and has the following comments: 1. Sign placement shall meet the sight distance triangle requirements as specified in the City code. cc: Alan White, Planning & Development Director Dave Kotecki, Sr. Project Engineer Steve Nguyen, Traffic Engineer File PLBLIC HEARING SPEAKERS' LIST CASE NO: REQUEST: LC) 2-- DATE: August 6, 1998 oo ti -.7ed <L. T~•I.O. ;scFe a 9so cv el9 G~. Speaker (please print) Name Address/Phone In Favor / Opposed 7500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Wheat Telephone 303/ 235-2846 Ridge DATE: AUGUST 5, 1998 REVISED The Wheat Ridge Department of Community Development has received a request for one additional freeway oriented sign (amendment to Planned Industrial DevelopmenUFinal Development Plan and setback variance at the property described below. Your response to the following questions and any comments on this proposal would be appreciated by August 12. 1998. No response from you by this date will constitute no objections of concerns regarding this proposal. CASE NO: WZ-98-15 LOCATION: 9500 West 49' Avenue REQUESTED ACTION: Request for amendment to the Pacifica Development Properties 11, LLC Planned Industrial Development Final Development Plan for one additional freestanding freeway oriented sign of 168 square feet per sign area face, 45 feet high. A request for setback variance of 23 feet from the minimum requirement of 30 feet for the installation of the sign at seven feet from property line is also part of this application. PURPOSE: For the installation of one additional freeway oriented freestanding sign on the premises. APPROXIMATE AREA: 6.97 acres total site area 1. Are public facilities or services provided by your agency adequate to serve this development? 2. Are service lines available to the development? 3. Do you have adequate capacities to service the development? 4. Can and will your agency service this proposed development subject to your rules and regulations? 5. Are specific easements needed on this or any other document? 6. Are there any concerns or problems your agency has identified which would or should affect approval of this request? Please reply to: Martin Omer Completed by: Department of Planning & Development (Name, Agency/Dep. ment, Date) DISTRIBUTION X Fire District (Arvada) X TCI of Colorado X Adjacent City (Arvada) X WHEAT RIDGE Police Department X Public Service Co. X WHEAT RIDGE Public Works Dept. X US West Communications X r WHEAT RIDGE Building,Division X Colorado Dept. Of Transportation X Jefferson County Planning Dept. "The Carnation City" C:\Barbara\AGENREF\wz98I Sbolle.wpd 1500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Telephone 303/ 235-2846 DATE: July 31, 1998 The City of Wheat Ridge The Wheat Ridge Department of Community Development has received a request for one additional freewav oriented sign (amendment to Planned Industrial Development/Final Development Plan and setback variance at the property described below. Your response to the following questions and any comments on this proposal would be appreciated by August 12, 1998. No response from you by this date will constitute no objections or concerns regarding this proposal. CASENO: WZ-98-15 LOCATION: 9500 West 49' Avenue REQUIESTED ACTION: Request for amendment to the Pacifica Development Properties 11, LLC Planned Industrial Development Final Development Plan for one additional freestanding freeway oriented sign of 168 square feet per sign area face, 45 feet high. A request for setback variance of 23 feet from the minimum requirement of 30 feet for the installation of the sign at seven feet from property line is also part of this application. PURPOSE: For the installation of one additional freeway oriented freestanding sign on the premises. APPROXIMATE AREA: 6.97 acres total site area Are public facilities or services provided by your agency adequate to serve this development? . c 5 2. Are service lines available to the development? v 3. Do you have adequate capacities to service the development? y 4. Can and will your agency service this proposed development subject to your rules and regulations? y 5. Are specific easements needed on this or any other document? 6. Are there any concerns or problems your agency has identified which would or should affect approval of this request? Please reply to: Martin Omer Completed by-]~ % A . T. P/c) a 5' F Department of Planning & Development (Name, Agency/Depar ent, Date) DISTRIBUTION: X Fire District (Arvada) X TCI of Colorado X Adjacent City (Arvada) X WHEAT RIDGE Police Department X Public Service Co. X WHEAT RIDGE Public Works Dept. X US West Communications X WHEAT RIDGE Building Division X Colorado Dept. Of Transportation X Jefferson County Planning Dept. "The Carnation City" e:\plannirig\fomts\agendaref.frm Arvada Fire Protection District P.O. Box 3-D ARVADA, COLORADO 80001 Telephone (303) 424-3012 - FAX (303) 432-7995 August 5, 1998 Mr. Martin Omer, Department of Community Development City of Wheat Ridge 7500 W. 29 h Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO. 80034 RE: Amendment One Free Standing Sign Pacifica Development 9500 W. 49h Ave, Dear Mr. Omer, We have no objections to the installation of the free standing sign for Bolle. Sincerely, Arvada Fire Protection District n tevesSteigle er Deputy Fire Marshal 7500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge; Colorado 80033 Wheat Telephone 303/ 235-2846 Ridge DATE: July 31, 1998 The Wheat Ridge Department of Community Development has received a request for one additional freeway oriented sign (amendment to Planned Industrial Development/Final Development Plan and setback variance at the property described below. Your response to the following questions and any comments on this proposal would be appreciated by August 12, 1998. No response from you by this date will, constitute no objections or concerns regarding this proposal. CASE NO: WZ-98-15 LOCATION: 9500 West 49" Avenue REQUESTED ACTION: Request for amendment to the Pacifica Development Properties 11, LLC Planned Industrial Development Final Development Plan for one additional freestanding freeway oriented sign of 168 square feet per sign area face, 45 feet high. A request for setback variance of 23 feet from the minimum requirement of 30 feet for the installation of the sign at seven feet from property line is also part of this application. PURPOSE: For the installation of one additional freeway oriented freestanding sign on the premises. APPROXIMATE AREA: 6.97 acres total site area I. Are public facilities or services provided by your agency adequate to serve this development? 2. Are service lines available to the development? 3. Do you have adequate capacities to service the development? 4. Can and will your agency service this proposed development subject to your rules and regulations? 5. Are specific easements needed on this or any other document? 6. Are there any concerns or problems your agency has identified which would or should affect approval of this request? Please reply to: Martin Omer Completed by: lGi/~ Gay r F, 6A. 7l I -L 1 g Department of Planning & Development (Name, Agenc /Department Dat DISTRIBUTION: X - Fire District (Arvada) X TCI of Colorado X Adjacent City (Arvada) X WHEAT RIDGE Police Department X Public Service Co. X WHEAT RIDGE Public Works Dept. X US West Communications X WHEAT RIDGE Building Division X Colorado Dept. Of Transportation X Jefferson County Planning Dept. "The Carnation City" e:\pl annirigUonns\agendaref frm MEMORANDUM TO Martin Omer Planning and Development FROM Deri Patt Police Department SUBJECT Case No: WZ-98-15 9800 W.49 Avenue DATE August 8, 1998 I have reviewed the plans for the above listed site. I have the following recommendations: 1. The solid base of the sign be finished with an anti-graffiti sealant. This will allow easier of clean-up of any paint, marker, etc. that may be placed on the support posts. From these plans, I have no further recommendations at this time. Revisions in the plans, may alter my recommendations. While my recommendations do not guarantee a crime-free environment, it has been experienced that application of the concept of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) will reduce the opportunity for crime to occur and will enhance the quality of life. Thank you. Deri 7500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Wheat Telephone 303/ 235-2846 Ridge DATE: July 31, 1998 The Wheat Ridge Department of Community Development has received a request for one additional freeway oriented sign (amendment to Planned Industrial Development/Final Development Plan and setback variance at the property described below. Your response to the following questions and any comments on this proposal would be appreciated by August 12, 1998. No response from you by this date will constitute no objections or concerns regarding this proposal. CASE NO: WZ-98-15 LOCATION: 9500 West 49" Avenue REQUESTED ACTION: Request for amendment to the Pacifica Development Properties 11, LLC Planned Industrial Development Final Development Plan for one additional freestanding freeway oriented sign of 168 square feet per sign area face, 45 feet high. A request for setback variance of 23 feet from the minimum requirement of 30 feet for the installation of the sign at seven feet from property line is also part of this application. PURPOSE: For the installation of one additional freeway oriented freestanding sign on the premises. APPROXIMATE AREA: 6.97 acres total site area 1. Are public facilities or services provided by your agency adequate to serve this development? khl5l 2. Are service lines available to the development?~ 3. Do you have adequate capacities to service the development? 4. Can and will your agency service this proposed development subject to your rules and regulations? /U/11- 5. Are specific easements needed on this or any other document? lV / 6. Are there any concerns or problems your agency has identified which wou should affect approval of this request? a6lo( f Please reply to: Martin Omer Completed by: okok d Department of Planning & Development (Name, ency/Department, Date) DISTRIBUTION: X Fire District (Arvada) X Adjacent City (Arvada) X Public Service Co. X US West Communications X Colorado Dept. Of Transportation X Jefferson County Planning Dept. "The Carnation City" X TCl of Colorado X WHEAT RIDGE Police Department X WHEAT RIDGE Public Works Dept. X WHEAT RIDGE Building Division e:\pl mning\forms\agendaref fret August 7, 1998 CITY OF ARVADA PLANNING DEPARTMENT 303 431-3020 PHONE ♦ 303 431-3969 FACSIMILE TDD: 303 431-3917 Martin Omer Department of Planning and Zoning City of Wheat Ridge 7500 West 29" Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Dear Mr. Omer, RE: Case No. WZ-98-15 RAUG EQa The City of Arvada Planning Department has received your referral for a sign variance at 9500 West 49" Avenue. The request is for a second freestanding freeway oriented sign for a tenant in the I-70 West Business Park. Information provided to us for review did not include any statements as to the hardship or practical difficulty associated with this request. Under "Character of Development" on the I-70 West Business Park Final Development Plan (FDP), it states that "The development is designed for commercial uses. The concept is to provide flexible space that can accommodate a variety of tenants". It is he opinion of the Arvada Planning Staff that the granting of a variance for a second freeway sign for an individual tenant is this business park would be unfair to all of the other tenants, located there. The Arvada Sign Code permits signs of this size and height for a single user building that is 300,000 square feet in size and located next to a interstate highway. Therefore, we would be opposed to this amendment to the FDP and setback variance. If you have any questions concerning the above comments, do not hesitate to give me a call at 431-3020. 8101 RALSTON ROAD ♦ P.O. BOX 8104 ♦ ARVADA, COLORADO ♦ 80001-8101 08/05/98 14:02 $ JeffCO Com Sevc IM002 Board of County Commissioners Michelle Lawrence District No. 1 Patricia B. Holloway District NO. 2 John P. Stone District No.3 Martin Omer City of Wheat Ridge Community Development 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Re: Case No.; WZ-98-15 9500 West 49th Avenue Dear Mr. Omer: August 5, 1998 Please be advised that Jefferson County Planning Staff have reviewed the proposed rezoning request to allow the installation of one additional freeway oriented freestanding sign on the subject property. Staff has no comment or objection to the additional proposed use. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this rezoning request. If I can be of any further assistance please contact me at (303) 271-8711. Thank Robert Narracci, Planner RiNI& cc: file 100 Jefferson County Parkway. G010en. COIOradO 60419 (303) 271.6511 08/05/98 14.02 $ Jeffco Com Seac _ R001 JEFFERSON COUNTY COLORADO Board of County Commissioners Michelle Lawrence District No. 1 Patricia a. Holloway District No. 2 John P. stone Disbyet No. 3 Date: - S-~S Time: 3'~0 Please Deliver the Following Pages] To: To Fax 777 - j 7 r From Fax (303) 271-87 From: I # of Pages Sent: If you did not receive all page(s), please call back as soon as possible at flnc/uding Cover Page)= ` _ ~r7 f1 100 Jefferson County Parkway, Golden, Colorado 80419-3550 City of Wheat Ridge Planning and Development Department Memorandum TO: Referral Agencies FROM: Martin Omer ~ SUBJECT: Application Case No. WZ-98-15, One Additional Freeway Oriented Sign Located at 9500 West 49"' Avenue DATE: August 5, 1998 Your agency/department was recently sent a referral package for the above referenced application. Since then the applicant has found an error in his submitted drawings and has therefore submitted a revised plan. The error was located in the bubble containing the elevation of the Bolle sign. The dimension of the sign face itself is for top to bottom dimension of seven feet even, rather that the previous figure showing a dimension of one foot-seven inches. If this correction changes any aspect of your comments/concerns, please do call me at 235-2854 as soon as possible. If I do not hear from your office by the August 12 response date, I will assume you have no concerns on this case. Thanks again for your efforts. enclosure c: Case File WZ-98-15 7500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Wheat Telephone 303/ 235-2846 Ridge DATE: AUGUST 5, 1998 REVISED The Wheat Ridge Department of Community Development has received a request for one additional freeway oriented sign (amendment to Planned Industrial Development/Final Development Plan and setback variance at the property described below. Your response to the following questions and any comments on this proposal would be appreciated by August 12. 1998. No response from you by this date will constitute no objections or concerns regarding this proposal. CASE NO: WZ-98-15 LOCATION: 9500 West 49' Avenue REQUESTED ACTION: Request for amendment to the Pacifica Development Properties 11, LLC Planned Industrial Development Final Development Plan for one additional freestanding freeway oriented sign of 168 square feet per sign area face, 45 feet high. A request for setback variance of 23 feet from the minimum requirement of 30 feet for the installation of the sign at seven feet from property line is also part of this application. PURPOSE: For the installation of one additional freeway oriented freestanding sign on the premises. APPROXIMATE AREA: 6.97 acres total site area 1. Are public facilities or services provided by your agency adequate to serve this development? 2. Are service lines available to the development? 3. Do you have adequate capacities to service the development? 4. Can and will your agency service this proposed development subject to your rules and regulations? 5. Are specific easements needed on this or any other document? 6. Are there any concerns or problems your agency has identified which would or should affect approval of this request? Please reply to: Martin Omer Department of Planning & Development DISTRIBUTION: X Fire District (Arvada) X Adjacent City (Arvada) X Public Service Co. X US West Communications X Colorado Dept. Of Transportation X Jefferson County Planning Dept. Completed by: (Name, Agency/Department, Date) X TCI of Colorado X WHEAT RIDGE Police Department X WHEAT RIDGE Public Works Dept. X WHEAT RIDGE Building Division "The Carnation City" C:\BubaraW GENREF\wz9815 bol le.wpd Gordon Sign Company August 3, 1998 Re: Amendment 9500 W. 49th, Wheat Ridge, CO Dear Wheat Ridge Property Owner: Per City of Wheat Ridge requirements, we are notifying you of a neighborhood meeting to be held at Wheat Ridge City Hall, 7500 W. 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80215, Lobby Conference Room, Wednesday, August 12, 1998 at 5:30 P.M. This meeting is in anticipation of an application of an Amendment to the Pacifica Development Properties II, LLC Planned Industrial Development Final Development Plan located at 9500 W. 49th, Wheat Ridge, CO. The Proposed Amendment would be for an additional freestanding sign 168 sq. feet per face, 45 feet overall height, with a 23 foot setback variance. If you have any questions, please call me or Tom Reed with Bolle, Inc. at 321-2200. Sincerely, )m Liley Account Executive JUh GORDON SIGN COMPANY A CGF Industnes Company P.O. BOX 40311 DENVER, COLORADO 80204-0311 (303) 629-6121 FAX (303) 629-1024 2120 NAEGELE ROAD COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO 80904 (719) 633-7763 FAX (719) 634-3550 1731 N. ERIE STREET PUEBLO, COLORADO 81001 (719) 543-7388 FAX (719) 543-5337 AUG 3 '98 10:28 FROM GORDON SIGN CO TO 2352857 PAGE.001/002 Facsimile Message Coversheet 0 Gordon Sign Company 2930 W. 9th Ave. • Denver 80204 (303) 629-6121 Of-'7e'- / Pages Follow TO: D/ 4C4~!Kg ~ FAX NUMBER: a3S =o2~S7 FROM: FAX NUMBER: (303) 629-1024 DATE: 61 RE: lll{' _ e~ lira ff fvvi s ~r/~eE MESSAGE AUG 3 198 1028 FROM GORDON SIGN CO TO 2352857 PAGE.002%002 Per City of Wheat Ridge requirements, we are notifying you of a neighborhood meeting to be held at Wheat Ridge City Hall, 75W W. 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80215, Lobby Conference Room, Wednesday, August 12, 1998 at 530 P.M. This meeting is in anticipation of an application of an Amendment to the Pacifica Development Properties II, LLC Planned Industrial Development Final Development Plan located at 9500 W. 49th, Wheat Ridge, CO. The Proposed Amendment would be for an additional freestanding sign 168 sq. feet per face, 45 feet overall height, with a 23 foot setback variance. TOTAL PAGE.002 TTTLE P NEl S. TWO RING; F FA D SI +NR - .05D ALUMINUM CABINET- PANT TEAL BLUE PER ROOF TOP SAMPLE 81 - 1/81 ALUMINUM FACE PAINT TEAL GREEN TITLE - ROUT COPY AND BACKWTTHWHfTEPLEX CABINETS . - T-12 ILLUMINATION - U.L SPECIFICATIONS L/y - 277 VOLT WIRING - 3 AMPS I-I f----I - CONCEALED FASTENERS 1'2-112' 10V STRUCTURE(VERIF) TENANT PANEL 6'0' TENANT PANEL (VERIFY) )--I 10.1x2' STRUCTURE - 14T TITLE CABINET VADTH - (VERI H 4'81 I1W I1105 Y 1'31 Ig } ALL EQUAL 187' 1` i i F--CENTER TO CENTER FEED ELEVATION ONEREQUIRED SCALE. 114'.t'0' DESIGN M SHEET DATE 2-17-97 REVISION 4-1-97 E FIRST INDUSTRIAL FIRST INDUSTRIAL REALTY TRUST, INC. 5350 South Roslyn Street Suite 240 Englewood, Colorado 80111 303/220-5565 Fax 303/220-5585 July 31, 1998 Mr. Tom Reed Bolle' Wheat Ridge, Colorado Dear Tom: This letter shall serve to confirm in writing that Bolle' is submitting a pole sign application to the City of Wheat Ridge with the knowledge and consent of First Industrial Realty, Inc., owner of the project. Sincerely, q.1RDUSTRIINC. Smith, SIOR Leasing Representative SWS:djb State of Colorado County of Arapahoe The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on the 31f' day of 99,r , by '&g oo- Z7- as tao~ „c of e~ o~tO .9w. . WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public My Commission Expires: B~ ~4 Dm f:\home\penmal\steveos%olle.IV.doc r ` ,.r ..e ~ LEGAL D~~~R i PT I C3N= AMEND W connr~•,c~rv~ Ar r+-~ ~r~~,sT coy c~ -rte sw a~a. of -._..~:..>~eT~+ ,~v~MU~ SE Il4, OF TF-E S1N I/4 OF 5ECTiON 15, T3S, Rb4W, OF THE ESfiH F'.M., THENCE S O4~03"22' E, ALC?NC~ 71-IE EAST LINE OFS SAID SW i/4, CJF 4~~~ TI-~ SE IJ4, QF THE SW Il4 OF SECTfON 15, A DISTANCE OF 30.C}U FEET TO TI-E RIGHT-OF-WAY OF UV~ST 49TH AV~.JE, AS ~-IOV'+~E {~I~J THE RECORDED PLAT OF INDEPENDENCE E?C~~CUfiVE OFFICE PARK, A!`~t3 ALSO ~lt~G THE POINT OF BEGINNING, 1~NCE C(~NTIG~RJING S Y F.\ OU^ 3'22" E ALONG SAID BAST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 529.E,2 FAT T~ - T~ NORTF~RL.Y RIGHT-OF-WAY Liter OF iNT~RSTATE 70 A~ RECORpEQ IN BOOK 184Q, AT PAGE 7G4 OF THE REC~RpS pF SI ~ OF LOTS JE~FE~50N ~C3i.~lTY, WHENCE N $1~4P}3' W ALONG SAID NQRTI-~2LY t,~J si2N~3 AVENUE RIGHT-OF-WAY l.lt~ FUR INTERSTATE ?O A DI~TI~NCE dF ~U5.O3 FEET TQ TF-E EAST~I..Y RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF INDEF'E~IVDE-t~iC~ STREET AS SHOWN OPJ TF~ RECORDED PLAT OF Il~EP~l7ENCE W 49TH AVE. / ` ~ BEING Q EXECUTIVE ~FiCE PARK, TNERiCE ALONG SAfD EASTB21_Y ~ -..i~ RIGHT-OF--WAY L1f~E THE FQ1_L.pWiNG 3 CQURSES~ fV 450751' W A D1~7ANCE QF 4g FEET, 2. N OC3°02'S1" W A DISTANCE OF 398.12 FEAT, 3. N 44-5?'04'" E A DISTANCE OF 14.10 FEET TO A POINT ON 7NE SOUTH RIGI-('f-OF-WAY OF WEST 49TH AVENI.~, Ti-ONCE N 89~A?3Cf° E ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGM'-QF-WAY LIPS A pIS7ANGE OF 624.36 FEET TO Ti-E POINT QF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 303.6C?~ SQUARE FEET QQ 6,9697 ACRES AAORE QR LE:SS. r~' v~1c~ j~~, r~o sc~~.~ ; _ av c~ ° i i zoo: ~-c `r 7 .r. ~yp' !~}1~~6r~r.1~►;:4ri4►'~Wt►.Ir~.,~+ ~if►~i.,err }l~w +~!M*~►~iy~^w►~ 5!.i.arr~~ ~~aR~ i!f~~ ~ 9r~fiwff~.,+1. - ~ lv+3, R's. 16 l'I'1'1° ~ DO 'T 1°~1#~fl~ r~ O~ ~AtD DRIvEB ~ ~ ~ ~ %i f,;; - i.)/i, ~ ~j~' nn t~ ~1 . -..~-w.p , trl~Cf~1~7 UK Lrl1•' 1 ~ ~#~...L C.~` MC1~1111f f 1 C'[) ~ 3!'0l TLS G~~C~~% i f~~.r ✓ ~ !~3 r ~ Q QaQ~Qfl~]~~i dC#~7Ct~CIDQt~Q 4Cl~C~~ld ! il"'iCit°1~1P~!°'41'tr'i1'1rt1"1r^tr'srSrr~tnnnr°srsr~nawrar~r~,r~r~~,rwrwww,~a~wrww~,~~.•.~~.,.~..,..».. 1t~ttt rt i ~cri% s ;'r : y I`1 .j rawswww~naro~u i ~~i'/r } ~ a { }i r, r f ,r~+ f f , r: ~ r`~~ ✓ ' ! ! f ~ F^ f1! r~~ ~ nrr ~ / '~l f- i - 1lff~/ ~ r°/~ ~ J 'A f ff~% !~/r~ Vii',+`: / ~ 'r % ~r f i'/ ` ~ Fir,' s l,~a` ~f;`ff Fr l!, r:, ~ ~✓r /i, iM~~lrMi ~ % f ++VV j p• J o ~ r ! i ..+s .a aow ~r. . ..,r. aax ,a.« w~. ewr w.. ~mw .a,.,e ,a..~. w.. ,4.........._ « e+~....~ sw w,r~ Mi .iw~.w o..ra- .r..,.a "„w, ,,..nv „.ww, aw.rn... .r..,....,~ ...,~ead .ra...~ Me.apw ~1t ~ r ' ~j, d V ~ Giii .r<~* i.i1 y}~ err. err ~d~~s~Mr .M►p+■ ~bA~$' r ~ C~ U ee AMr say aa+ pw ,.,v xer +a'a ®w W MMe. aM evM W. w..,~ ..P w.-. .,.w. .rw ++~.w m..,.u s*el +w+ aw 'w4 MMM 4Mn Wu xu. wu Mnm uem s 1 P f J f fJ l . f f, f,r " t { ~l /,~f~ ~d - r f' r,r 'r i; r~s ~ P~~ r~ ~ a aM~w~n %,F j,i { / l~: '~l .r j j, rtt,} ✓ ~ ~ .S .M!/. f ~Y ~ f v~ r'~~ • f . l f f r ti F F ~7ry~ 1 f/ ®1M ,~~~~r Wit. ~ I ter % ~d~~~~~0~~~~~Q~~~~®~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~Q p ; f, ~ ,r' ''i;,, A~~ f r ~JC~iC1L7~3~®d®~®€~~iQl~t~C - . {~~jj f/~ (/1~I~6 ~ 'f^ naawaa.ra.rYw ~ Mar.` ~ . 1~~►~il~'~ ~ fiC~ C"~ ' ~ ~ r,, _ ~ _r ~ w i ~ yMgw~ 7~f "".+a ~ ~.~i' Orb' i~ a` / .1 r 5 ~r , , ' r / ~I rppy ~1 r . , ~ ►w"M°~r i, r ~ . ~ t t°~ ~ ~ r~',"~!r C~ ~ ~ t . ! ~7f ~ / n3a~ ~ , °W.,~ ~ ~ yyyy~~,~ sar ~ ^RI. ~ J mot. ~ : ; r~ . _ , 1 ~ X! vT~N~ 7 ice. r' ;W- ~ r _  Vi i IVL. G~.:~QV i?f"- .76.Q ~►"F~VC~ ACGE°v9 ..POINT.... "`"'--"_'`"";=.-..~•r 60% S/S ROOM - 9,841 Si! - 16.4 SPACES 4 T~ ZONE D: A-t LOOP) BIJILC31f4G C - 40% OFFICE - 11,739 S= - 58.7 SPACES BY=~_~~_ 60% S!S ROOM • 17,608 :,3f= - 29.3 SPACES DEPUTY r~ r NORTH BUILDING Q - 20% OFFICE - 8,331 Sf'= ' 41.7 SPACES ro -809 S!S ROOM = 33,326 :3F = 55.5 SPACES LANDSCAPED AREA AMENDMENT # 1 TOTAL • 279.0 SPADES ~"ITE PLAN BOLLE FREESTANDING SIGN ALI ON- P-M W, - OVERALL HEIGHT PARKING PROVIDED ua c~ 1 UARE FEET PER FADE HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE 8 SPACES 7-O' SETBACK FROM PROPERTY LINE STANDARD (9'X19') 286 SPACES a Q wools" DOCK SPACES 39 SPACES FDpl +n r Double Fa ~ F WNE~t i`~~.iP~_ To: Mayor and City Council - From: Robert C. Middaugh, City Manager U Date: July 29, 1998 Subject: New business, Bolle eyeware City of Wheat Ridge MEMORANDUM Attached please find a letter from a new business in Wheat Ridge. Bolle is an internationally known maker of eyeware (predominantly sunglasses). As indicated, they have moved to Wheat Ridge as their new corporate headquarters, which will include a distribution facility and a retail outlet. In order to keep the business we will need to entertain a request for a new sign at their location, which is in the Pacifica Development on the I-70 frontage road, east of Kipling. An amendment to the PID will be needed to add a sign to the location. The sign in question is approximately 50' high and adjacent to the frontage road. It is an attractive and relatively simple design that uses the appearance of their business logo. We have not yet received the official application, but expect it soon. The issue for us is whether we can get the request processed in a fashion that can address a very tight timetable. The business needs the sign for a planned grand opening on October 2 to which you will all be invited. They have some 900 athletes under contract for their products and expect some of them to be present for the opening. In order to meet this time line we can hear the matter at the August 20 Planning Commission and then at the August 24 City Council meeting. While we can meet the necessary steps for legal publication and the hearing process, having the two meetings so close together will not allow us to have minutes of the Planning Commission meeting in your Council materials. We should be able to have an excerpt for the 8/24 meeting. I do not anticipate that there will be concerns on the project at this point. I will plan to expedite the processing of the application for Bolle unless there are concerns expressed by the Council. For your information, a package of information on Bolle, not the application, will be in your Council mail box in the next few days. This information should help with general Company background. Specific information on their application will be sent as normally done for your consideration 7500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge Colorado 80033 Wheat Telephone 303/ 235-2846 Ridge DATE: July 31, 1998 The Wheat Ridge Department of Community Development has received a request for one additional freeway oriented sign (amendment to Planned Industrial Development/Final Development Plan and setback variance at the property described below. Your response to the following questions and any comments on this proposal would be appreciated by August 12, 1998. No response from you by this date will constitute no objections or concerns regarding this proposal. CASE NO: WZ-98-15 LOCATION: 9500 West 49`h Avenue REQUESTED ACTION: Request for amendment to the Pacifica Development Properties 11, LLC Planned Industrial Development Final Development Plan for one additional freestanding freeway oriented sign of 168 square feet per sign area face, 45 feet high. A request for setback variance of 23 feet from the minimum requirement of 30 feet for the installation of the sign at seven feet from property line is also part of this application. PURPOSE: For the installation of one additional freeway oriented freestanding sign on the premises. APPROXIMATE AREA: 6.97 acres total site area 1. Are public facilities or services provided by your agency adequate to serve this development? 2. Are service lines available to the development? 3. Do you have adequate capacities to service the development? 4. Can and will your agency service this proposed development subject to your rules and regulations? 5. Are specific easements needed on this or any other document? 6. Are there any concerns or problems your agency has identified which would or should affect approval of this request? Please reply to: Martin Omer Department of Planning & Development Completed by: (Name, Agency/Department, Date) DISTRIBUTION: X Fire District (Arvada) X Adjacent City (Arvada) X Public Service Co. X US West Communications X Colorado Dept. Of Transportation X Jefferson County Planning Dept. X TCI of Colorado X WHEAT RIDGE Police Department X WHEAT RIDGE Public Works Dept. X WHEAT RIDGE Building Division "The Carnation City" e:\pl annidg\forms\agenftef. frm c~ r A m (ins Wednesday, July 29,1998 rg Australia Mayor Gretchen Cerveny A°"lid City of Wheat Ridge Be1ai°"' 7500 West 20 Avenue eraP1 Wheat Ridge, CO 80214 Canada Chile Ch,,, Greetings Mayor Cerveny, Cnl.mbia Ae^ ^a We at Bolle want to extend a warm thanks to you and the many city officials in various d departments for providing hospitality and assistance over the past few months as we fla... completed our move from Denver to our new Bolle Inc. World Headquarters in Wheat Ridge, German, located at 9500 West 49" Avenue. Bolle Inc., publicly traded on the NASDAQ under the symbol BEYE, is a diversified Ind...... international designer, manufacturer and marketer of authentic premium optical eyewear, action and specialty sports eyewear, safety eyewear for industrial environments, and military Italy and tactical eyewear. Boll6 markets an array of products under the Bolle brand, as well as Japan designs and manufactures for many other eyewear companies around the world. Bolle, in ° Qa business since 1888, has been making eyewear since 1938. Mexico NWM,nde They say there's no place like home, and Bolle is proud to tell the world that its new World Na. Zealand Headquarters is located in Wheat Ridge, Colorado. Our 40,000 square-foot facilities serve Nu..a, many important functions: v°lane "°pa' • Wheat Ridge is home office to the management team and employees of Bolld North Singap... America, totaling 82 employees with a local payroll of over $3 million. Bolld North Slnvenla America serves the United States and Canada with annual sales of $32 million. S°nlh Alri°a Span • Wheat Ridge is the distribution base for Bolle products throughout the United States. Sweden Swilfelland • Wheat Ridge is the epicenter of Bolle'S international management operation, where under the vision and leadership of Bolle Inc. President and CEO, Gary Kiedaisch, strategic United 8ingdam global marketing and management platforms targeted for over 40 countries will be 8nay launched that will lead Bolle to new heights in 1999 and beyond. U.S.A. Venezuela i L 0, Me Inc 9500 W. 49th AVE., SUITE B-100 WHEAT RIO9E, CO 80033 P 303.327.2200 F 303.327.2300 c6 r With keen awareness of business around the world, Bolle is equally focused on being a Argenrna corporate leader in its home community. Australia Aualr;a For example, Bolle will open a retail store in the front of its Wheat Ridge World Headquarters Belgium that is expected to generate annual sales of $100,000. The store will showcase how Bolle does Hra=;l business around the world, and it will explain Bolle's evolution as an authentic, original brand Canzda over the past 51 years, emerging from a family-owned business to a worldwide leader in premium optical eyewear. And through educational cooperatives, we intend to involve mina today's youth in store operations and teach them valuable business techniques. Colombia BenmarF There are many exciting things happening at Bolle! We look forward to a mutually beneficial d relationship with you and leaders within the community. France Germany Greaee Best Regards, Hong Nang Indonesia lly It,ly pa^ Ken D'Arcy Horea Me+lao Bolle North America Vice President, General Manager Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Singapore Slovenia SoOh Alrica SPain Sweden Svitzerland ivley United Kingdom Uruguay U. S A. Venezuela L O, Q®Inc 9500 W. 49th AVE., SUITE B-100 WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 P 303.327.2200 F 303.327.2300 of WHEAT i LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION of WHEgr o ti O Planning and Development Department 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 ^o Phone (303) 235-2846 co cRPOo (Please pant or type all informationi Applicant Tom Reed, Bolle, Inc. Address 9500 W. 49th, Unit B Phone 327-2200 City Feat Ridge, CO 80033 Owner First Industrial L.P. Address 5350 South Roslyn St., Ste. 240 Phone 220-5565 City Englewood, CO 80111 Location of request (address) 9500 W. 49th, Unit R, Wheat Ridge. CO Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions liste d below which pertain to your request.) Change of zone or zone conditions Variance / Waiver Site development plan approval Nonconforming use change ❑ Special Use Permit ❑ Flood plain special exception ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Interpretation of Code ❑ Temporary Use, Buildings, Signs ❑ Lot line Adjustment ❑ Minor Subdivision (5 lots or less) ❑ Planned Building Group ❑ Subdivision (More than 5 lots) ❑ Street Vacation ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final Other: Amendment to Pacifica Developme Detailed description of the request: see attached Properties 11, LLC Planned Industrial setback variance. Fill out the following information to the best of your knowledge. Current Zoning: PID Size of Lot (acres or square footage): 303,619 . ft. Current use: Light industrial, retail, office Proposed use: Same Assessors Parcel Number: I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above, without whose cons ested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners must submit po ~gf~ tt~ 4 in the owner which a d of this action on his behalf. ~ Signature of A lid X- - k 1 c e. n~ g Subscribed a d swor this day of.Ltvl. 19 To- t 9 •,•UBLOGo O TFoF COL~¢~ o ry Public My commission expires Date received - Receipt No. Case No. U)Z~J Related Case No. Zoning ~8m Quarter Section Map a AMENDMENT #1 FOR A FREESTANDING SIGN WITH A SETBACK VARIANCE PACIFICA DEVELOPMENT PROPERTIES 11, LLC PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN We are requesting this amendment to allow an additional freestanding sign to the original development plan with a setback variance. The proposed Bolle sign would be 168 sq. feet per face in area and would be mounted 45' above grade with a 7' setback from the property line. The proposed sign would be mounted on rectangular tubes with textured pole covers painted white to match the buildings. The oval background would be aluminum with illuminated Bolle' letters. The size and height of the proposed freestanding sign would be compatible with the sign code for freestanding signs in non-residential districts for businesses located within one-quarter (1/4) mile of 1-70. The sign code states: Two freestanding signs per development (one per street front) are permitted with one sign up to 50' high. Based on Bolle's 29,000 sq. ft buildings, the sign code would permit a 230 sq. ft. sign. Our request for a setback of 7' rather than the required 30' setback is necessary due to the 10' barrier fence along 1-70 which impacts the visibility for westbound traffic. A 30' setback would also place the sign in the middle of the parking lot. CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT INVOICE NAME DATE: 3 ®-2 CASE NO. FEE TYPE FEE CHARGE ACCOUNT NUMBER Application Submittal See Fee Schedule /0 01-550-01-551 Publications/Notices See Fee Schedule J-CCU 01-550-02-551 24" x'36" Blue Line $ 3.25 01-550-04-551 24" x 36" Mylar Copy $ 6.00 Single Zoning Map $ 2.00 Set of Zoning Maps $20.00 I V x 17" Color Map $ 5.00 TT E'E .;EAI R'TnGE • j a 4c vr; du Comp. Plan Maps $ 5.00 ea. a; o; r Comp. Plan Book w/Map $25.00 0 Fruitdale Valley Master Plan $ 2.50 RECEIPT NO-Ct 05034 AM UNI MSD ZONING APPLICHTIGN F 0"00 1 ' Subdivision Regulations $ 4.50 rr r+ NSD ZUr?ING REIMBURSEMENT 7. Zoning Ordinance $15.00 (does not include annual updates) PAINIENT'; P TVFEl yi L 4df C !_937 2' 0 00 I L 22v- -w Copies $.15/page Copy of Meeting Tapes $25.00/tape 01-550-04-551 Miscellaneous: 01-550-04-551 TOTAL COST: ~O C7 d cAplenningW o mAinvoice The City of 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE. CO 80215-6713 (303) 234-5900 City Admin. Fax 1 234-5924 May 26, 2000 Police Dept. Fax It 235-2949 Pam Rice First Industrial Realty 5350 South Roslyn Street, #240 Englewood, CO 80111 Subject: 9500 West 49`h Avenue, Wheat Ridge Dear Pam: heat edge GR I have enclosed information and application material for your use concerning your intent to amend the Pacifica Final Planned Industrial Development. Your desire as I understand it is to retain the freestanding sign previously approved for Bolle', Inc. Please note that Bolle's 1998 application included a variance request to locate the sign within the front setback area. City Council approval of both the amendment and the variance will be necessary to (1) retain the sign, and (2) retain the sign in it's current location. Enclosed are the following: 1. Zoning Code Section 26-6; Legislative and Administrative Process and Procedures, 2. Zoning Code Section 26-25 (IX); Amendments to Development Plans, 3. Zoning Code Section 26-25 (V); Application for Planned Developments, 4. Variance Processing Package, 5. Memorandum RE: Public Notice Noticing Procedures, 6. Public Hearing Posting Requirements, 7. Notice of Neighborhood Input Meeting, 8. Land Use Case Processing Application, 9. Jefferson County Recordation Requirements, 10. Wheat Ridge Fee Schedule, 11. Copy of Bolle's 1998 application (the application fee for the combined amendment and variance) is calculated as: Re-zoning/Plan Amendment: $200.00 Publication/Public Notice: 300.00 Multiple Case Processing (Variance): 50.00 Recordation Fee: 10.00 $560.00 RECYCLED PAPER Please contact me when you are ready to schedule your neighborhood meeting. Sincere y, 114-~ ~41 -'(41~ Martin Omer Economic Development Specialist/Associate Planner Attachments cc: Alan White, Director of Planning and Development 7ne City of 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, , WHE CO 80215-6713 (303) 234-5900 Wheat City Admin. Fax x 234-5924 Police Dept. Fax a 235-2949 R d1r n April 24, 2000 id i k ge Tim Rogers First Industrial Realty 5350 South Roslyn Street, #240 Englewood, CO 80111 Subject: Interstate 70 West Business Park Dear Tim: Per your request, I have continued to research the issue of the existing Bolle' freestanding sign located at 9500 West 491h Avenue. In particular, you have expressed interest in knowing exactly what the necessary process is to keep the sign structure and sign square footage on the property after Bolle'vacates their leased space. I present the following for your consideration: 1. Case No. WZ-97-10 was heard and approved by City Council on September 15, 1997. During this hearing, City Council approved the re-zone from Commercial-One to Planned Industrial Development (PID), Outline and Final Development Plan, and a setback variance for the freestanding sign. As part of the hearing, testimony and motions were made specifically regarding the freestanding signage. Council minutes from the hearing (copy enclosed) show that Council specifically limited the development to one freestanding sign. 2. Case No. WZ-98-15 was heard by City Council on August 24, 1998 to amend the Outline and Final Development Plan to allow one additional freestanding sign on the premises specifically for Bolle', with associated specific maximum square footage, height and setbacks, and materials. A variance for the setback for this sign was part of the case. Council approved the amendment to the Final Development Plan with the condition that the sign was for the Bolle' Company only and, if and when Bolle' vacated the premises, that the sign and the associated structure must be removed. A copy of these City Council minutes are enclosed for your reference. 3. We have been unable to locate any documentation that the amended plan for Case No. WZ-98-15 was officially recorded at the County Clerks office. The City's development regulations state that recording of City Council actions, including actions regarding land development cases, must be recorded within 60 days of the final approval action. If this procedure is not satisfied, the action is null and void. I will continue to research this issue, but please be aware that if the mylar showing the amendment was not recorded within the prescribed time period, the Bolle' sign is in violation of the approved and recorded development plan, being the plan from Case No. WZ-87-10, and the sign will have to be removed. Cj RECYCLED PAPER 4. Alan White, Director ofPlanning and Development, has confirmed that, provided all other criteria have been met and the existing Bolle' sign is legal at this time, in order for the sign and associated structure to be used by another tenant, a development application to amend the PID and associated Development Plans, as well as another variance for setbacks, will be necessary. The process requires a neighborhood meeting, a full application submitted to the Department ofPlanning and Development, and hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council. This process is estimated to take approximately four months from the date a complete application package is submitted to the Planning and Development Department. The option of an administrative amendment to the PID and/or Outline and Final Development Plan for the sign is not provided in the City's regulations. Understanding your desire to market the space currently occupied by Bolle' and to be able to offer the freeway oriented freestanding signage currently enjoyed by Bolle, I encourage you to begin the application process at your earliest convenience. I remain available to assist you in any way available, and can be contacted at telephone number 303- 235-3854. F Orner, AICP Economic Development Specialist enclosures: City Council minutes from Case No. WZ-97-10 City Council minutes from Case No. WZ-98-15 cc: Al ite, Planning and Development Director ,ease File WZ-98-15 Correspondence File This design is the exclusive property of Gordon Sign Company and cannot be reproduced either in whole or in part without their consent. Gordon Sign Company will endeavor to closely match calcm, Including PNS colors where spechted We cannot guereram asset matches due to varying compatibility et scheme, macerate and palms used. 4 1% Gordon Eqn Cow n k.Rev. /Crate: S. Rev. / Date: C. Rev. ! Date D. Rev.! Date Drawing # COLOR Gordon Slime C~panu ,-6-This design is the exclusive property of Gordon Sign Company and cannot be reproduced either in whole or in part Without their consent. Gomon sign company will entleevot m cicseiy match carers, In olni PMs wics Where specifled. We wnrot gu.=b...a matches dm m v competibiity & v.,R.. materleis and Purr uses. A. Rev. ! Date: S.Rea. / Date: C. Rev, Date D,Rev.! Date Voltage: Verified by: Date: Client Approval: Client: SOLLE Account Rep. 1. LiLEY Date: 5/28/98 Drawn by: S. KING Scale: Drawing # COLOR Ciordon 6 This design is the exclusive property of Gordon Sign Company and cannot be reproduced either in whole or in part without their consent. Gordon sign company will endeavor to closely match colors, including PMS colors where specified. We cannot guarantee exact matches due to varying compatibility of surface materials and paints used. in one A. Rev. / Date: B.Rev. / Date: C. Rev. / Date D.Rev. / Date Voltage: Verified by: Date: Client Approval: Client: BOLLE Account Rep. S. LILEY Date: 5/28/96 Drawn by: J. KING Scale: Drawing # COLOR EXISTING SIGN 10'0' STRUCTURE (VERIFY) T-NANi PANEL TENANT PANEL (VERIFY) 141'TIT.ECABINETWDTH 10-1/ STRUCTURE VERI H 4'8' I1n, 7 I1'- Tg TALL EQUAL 187' +I- SIGN FEED ASAGREED WITH BLAI(EPMOCARD IM PLATED STUD ANCHORS 3' INTO STRUCTURE (EIGHT PER SIDE) TENANT PANEI - DNF DO uv F FACED SIGN - .050 ALUMINUM CABINET PAINT TEAL BUJE - 2'RETAINERS AND 7 ALUMNUM TSARS PAINT TEAL GREEN - 2X Z 'X 3/15' ANGLE FRAME PAINTED - 3118' WHITE TUFFAC FACES PAINT FIELD OPAQUE TEAL GREEN - FUTURE TENANT COPY TO BE TRANSLUCENT WHITE - 800MAT-121LLLMNATION. U.L SPEGFICATIONS - 277 VOLT WIRMIG - 10 AMPS ALIGN BOTTOM FOUR DIVIDER BARS WITH STRUCTURE DETAIL <-STRUCTURE BY OTHERS..... FIELD VERIFY ALL MEASUREMENTS i i i -~CEitTFR TO CENTER FEED ELEVAMN ONEREQUIRED SCALE. 1/4'.1'0' DESIGN X SHEET / DATE 2-17-97 REVISION 4-1-97