The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWZ-05-057500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 303/235-2846 Fax: 303/235-2857 September 26, 2005 Marshal H. Fishman 633 17a' Street Suite 2700 Denver, CO 80202-3635 FAX #303-292-1300 Re: Medved Hummer Facility I-70 Frontage Road and Parfet Street Dear Mr. Fishman: The City of Teat Ridge OF WHE4J%p. U„~ ~O~Q.Rppq.._ This letter is in regard to property located at 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street which is under ownership of Bear Land Holdings LLC. The property is subject to a land use entitlement process within the City of Wheat Ridge to allow a Hummer dealership. I am acting as a case planner for the final development plan and plat approval project. Due to unique site issues and regional drainage concerns, the entitlement process may take longer than usually expected. In addition, legal noticing and publication requirements must occur for each public hearing, of which there are two. In light of development issues and legal noticing, it is unlikely that final approval by City Council will occur before December 31, 2005. If you would like to discuss this further, do not hesitate to contact me at 303-235-2848. Sincerely, Meredith Reckert, AICP Senior Planner 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Telephone 303/235-2846 FAX 303/235-2857 August 3, 2005 Mike Pharo Michael G. Pharo & Associates 2835 West Oxford, #6 Englewood, CO 80110 Dear Mr. Pharo: The City of Wheat Ridge At its meeting of July 25, 2005, City Council APPROVED Case No. WZ-05-05, a request for approval of a zone change from Commercial-One and Agricultural-One to Planned Commercial Development and approval of an outline development plan for properties located at 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street, with the following findings: 1. The majority of the property under consideration was zoned from A-1 to C-I in 1986. 2. The design standards established for the PCD are generally consistent with the C- I zone district design standards. 3. The proposed document meets all requirements for a Planned Commercial Development Outline Development Plan. 4. There has been a change in character in the area as evidenced by a new commercial development occurring to the west of the property in the past seven years, an approved rezoning to PID to the north of the property in 2002, and construction of a major commercial center at 50th and Kipling. 5. Although not in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan designation, the designation of Agricultural Estate Residential did not acknowledge the presence of commercial zoning on the property. Large lot residential development is inconsistent with the trend of commercial and industrial development in the area. 6. A majority of the property is already zoned commercially. The proposed zone change is compatible with the surrounding area and there will be minimal adverse impacts. 7. There will be economic benefits to the community derived from the zone change. 8. Adequate infrastructure is available to serve the proposed development. " 9. The change of zone will not adversely affect the public health, safety or welfare. 10. The change of zone will not create an isolated zone district. Mike Pharo Page 2 August 3, 2005 With the following condition: 1. Employee parking for the Medved Autoplex (all three parcels) shall be accommodated on site. There shall be no exceptions. Enclosed is a copy of the signed ordinance and a draft copy of the minutes stating the Council's decision. A blackline photographic mylar of the outline development plan needs to be submitted for recording with Jefferson County within 60 days of final action. The fees for recording with Jefferson County are $11 per page. Please submit payment along with the mylar. Please feel free to contact me at 303-235-2846 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Kathy Field Administrative Assistant Enclosure: Ordinance Draft of Minutes cc: John Medved Medved Autoplex 11001 W. I-70 F.R.N. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 cA...Ny Do ments\Kathy`PCRPTS\PIANGCOWCORRESP\2005\WZ0505 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER GOKEY Council Bill No. 11-2005 Ordinance No. 1349 Series of 2005 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE FROM A-1, AGRICULTURE-ONE AND C-1, COMMERCIAL-ONE TO PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND FOR APPROVAL OF AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4900 AND 4990 PARFET STREET (CASE NO. WZ-05-05) BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO THAT: Section 1. Upon application by Michael G. Pharo Associates for Bear Land Holdings, approval of a zone change from A-1, Agriculture-One and C-1, Commercial-One to Planned Commercial Development and for approval of an Outline Development Plan for property located at 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street and pursuant to the findings made based on testimony and evidence presented at a public hearing before the Wheat Ridge City Council, a zone change and Outline Development Plan are approved for the following described land: PARCEL A: A TRACT OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SDCTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16; THENCE NORTH 00001'12" EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, 448.01 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF THE DENVER AND NORTHWESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT-OF- WAY AS RECORDED IN BOOK 126 AT PAGE 583 IN THE CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 74°07'34" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT- OF-WAY, 549.56 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF PARFET STREET AS RECORDED IN BOOK 155 AT PAGE 424 IN THE CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE OF JEFFERSON COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 00°04'24" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY, 96.86 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID DENVER AND NORTHWESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF PARFET STREET NORTH 00°06'56" WEST, 633.78 FEET TO A POINT BEING 247.50 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16; THENCE NORTH 89043'46" EAST, PARALLEL WITH AND 247.50 FEET DISTANT WHEN MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID NORTH LINE, 530.21 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16; THENCE SOUTH 00*01' 12" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 582.83 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. PARCEL B: THAT PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, 528 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EAST LINE OF PARFET STREET; THENCE SOUTH, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF PARFET STREET, 247.50 FEET; THENCE EAST, PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, 528 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 247.50 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1329 AT PAGE 127 OF THE JEFFERSON COUNTY RECORDS, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. Section 2. Vested Property Rights. Approval of this zone change and Outline Development Plan does not create a vested property right. Vested property rights may only arise and accrue pursuant to the provisions of Section 26-121 of the Code of Laws of the City of Wheat Ridge. Section 3. Safety Clause. The City of Wheat Ridge hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is promulgated under the general police power of the City of Wheat Ridge, that it is promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare of the public and that this ordinance is necessary for the preservation of health and safety and for the protection of public convenience and welfare. The City Council further determines that the ordinance bears a rational relation to the proper legislative object sought to be attained. Section 4. Severability_ If any clause, sentence, paragraph, or part of this Zoning Code or the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall for any reason be adjusted by a court of competent jurisdiction invalid, such judgment shall not affect application to other persons or circumstances. Section 5. Supersession Clause. If any provision, requirements or standard established by this Ordinance is found to conflict with similar provisions, requirements or standards found elsewhere in the Code of Laws of the City of Wheat Ridge, which are in existence as of the date of adoption of this Ordinance, the provisions, requirements and standards here shall supersede and prevail. Section 6 . This Ordinance shall take effect 15 days after final publication. INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first reading by a vote of _g_ to 0 on this 27 h day of June, 2005, ordered published in full in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Wheat Ridge and Public Hearing and consideration on final passage set for July 25, 2005, at 7:00 o'clock p.m., in the Council Chambers, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final reading by a vote of 8 to 0 this 25 day of July 2005. SIGNED by the Mayor on this 261 ATTEST: Pamela Y. Anderso City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM BY CITY ATTORNEY Ger Pahl- CITY A ORNEY I51 publication: June 30, 2005 2nd publication: July 28, 2005 Wheat Ridge Transcript Effective Date: August 12, 2005 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: JUIy 25, 2005 Page -2- Item 1. Consent Agenda: A. Award ITB-05-023 Kipling Street Pedestrian Project in an amount not to exceed $179,737.03. B. Approval of participation in the XCEL Energy Quality of Services Plan proceedings at the Public Utilities Commission. C. RESOLUTION 38-2005 - A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2005 CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM (CIP) BUDGET TO REFLECT THE APPROVAL OF A SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $15,981.70, ALONG WITH AWARDING ITB-05-17 ESTES-CARR MAJOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, PHASE 11, IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $785,981.70. D. RESOLUTION 39-2005 -A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2005 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO REFLECT THE APPROVAL OF A SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $21,000 TOWARDS THE PURCHASE OF FOUR POLICE VEHICLES, ALONG WITH APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF FOUR FULLY EQUIPPED POLICE VEHICLES IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $129,000. Consent Agenda was introduced and read by Mrs. Sang. Motion by Mrs. Sang for approval of the Consent Agenda; seconded by Mr. Gokey; carried 8-0. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ORDINANCES ON SECOND READING Item 2. COUNCIL BILL 11-2005-AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE FROM A-1, AGRICULTURE-ONE AND C-1, COMMERCIAL-ONE TO PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND FOR APPROVAL OF AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4900 AND 4990 PARFET STREET. (Case No. WZ-05-05) (Michael G. Pharo Associates for Bear Land (Holdings) Mayor Cerveny opened the public hearing. Council Bill 11-2005 was introduced on second reading by Mr. Gokey. Deputy City Clerk Christa Jones read the executive summary and assigned Ordinance No. 1349. Meredith Reckert, Community Development Department, was sworn in by the Mayor and presented the staff report. She entered into the record the Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance, Case file and packet materials and contents of the digital presentation. She also distributed a letter from the Jefferson Economic Council in support of this Ordinance. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: July 25, 2005 Page -3- The following speakers were sworn in by the Mayor: Dennis Polk, legal Counsel for the applicant, gave background on this proposed development. Michael Pharo of Michael G. Pharo Associates, Inc., Land Planning and Landscape Architecture, described how the parcel would contain a parking lot, and a Hummer facility. This will resolve the parking issue and drainage concerns will be addressed. Wendel Ayers explained the drainage. Bruce McLennan, Architect, showed drawings of the proposed Hummer facility. C.B. Stiesmeyer, homeowner to the north of the property, expressed his concerns regarding speeding problems on Parfet and possible problems with lighting. He submitted a letter outlining his problems for the record. Mayor called a recess at 9:10 p.m. Meeting reconvened at 9:20. Mayor closed the public hearing. Motion by Mr. Gokey to adopt Council Bill 11-2005 (Ordinance No. 1349) with the following findings: 1. The majority of the property under consideration was zoned from A-1 to c-1 in 1986. 2. The design standards established for the PCD are generally consistent with the C-1 zone district design standards. 3. The proposed document meets all requirements for a Planned Commercial Development Outline Development Plan. 4. There has been a change in character in the area as evidenced by a new commercial development occurring to the west of the property in the past seven years, an approved rezoning to PID to the north of the property in 2002, and construction of a major commercial center at 5& & Kipling. 5. Although not in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan designation, the designation of Agricultural Estate Residential did not acknowledge the presence of commercial zoning on the property. Large lot residential development is inconsistent with the trend of commercial and industrial development in the area. 6. A majority of the property is already zoned commercially. The proposed zone change is compatible with the surrounding area and there will be minimal adverse impacts. 7. There will be economic benefits to the community derived from the zone change. 8. Adequate infrastructure is available to serve the proposed development. 9. The change of zone will not adversely affect the public health, safety or welfare. 10. The change of zone will not create an isolated zone district. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: July 25, 2005 With the following condition: Page -4- Employee parking for the Medved Autoplex (all three parcels) shall be accommodated on site. There shall be no exceptions. Seconded by Mr. DiTullio; carried 8-0. Item 3_ Public Meeting on 2006 Budget. Mr. Schutz introduced Item 3 and read the executive summary. Van C. Wedgewood, representing the Applewood Business Association, asked that Council take a close and careful look at applying as much of the Capital Improvement Budget to alleviate the potential problems regarding the street improvements necessary for the Cabela's development. DECISIONS, RESOLUTIONS. AND MOTIONS Motion by Mr. Gokey to suspend Council Rules during the testimony for Items 4 and 5; seconded by Mr. Schulz; carried 8-0. Item 4. RESOLUTION 36-2005 - A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION STRATEGY REPORT, REPOSITIONING WHEAT RIDGE, AND ADOPTING ITS FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AS GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR REVITALIZING THE CITY. Resolution 36-2005 was introduced by Mrs. Rotola; executive summary read by the Deputy City Clerk. AAd Item 5. RESOLUTION 37-2005 - A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE FORMATION OF WHEAT RIDGE 2020, A NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSISTING THE CITY IN BRINGING ABOUT COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION AND AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2005 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO REFLECT THE APPROVAL OF A SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $415,000 TO BEGIN BUILDING THE RECOMMENDED ORGANIZATION, WR2020, WHICH IN TURN WILL SET DIRECTION FOR, AND IMPLEMENT THE NINE STRATEGIES CONTAINED WITHIN THE NRS REPOSITIONING WHEAT RIDGE REPORT. Resolution 37-2005 was introduced by Mrs. Rotola, who also read the executive summary. of w„EqT ITEM NO: V a oRpoo m REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION WE$: 7; COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 25, 2005 TITLE: COUNCIL BILL NO. 11-2005: AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE FROM A-1, AGRICULTURE-ONE AND C-1, COMMERCIAL-ONE TO PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND FOR APPROVAL OF AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4900 AND 4990 PARFET STREET (CASE NO. WZ-05-05) ® PUBLIC HEARING ❑ ORDINANCES FOR 1 ST READING ❑ BIDS/MOTIONS ® ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING ❑ RESOLUTIONS Quasi-Judicial: ® ❑ Yes No Community Development Director City Manager EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant requests approval of a zone change from A-1, Agriculture-One and C-1, Commercial- One to Planned Commercial Development (PCD) and for approval of a PCD Outline Development Plan for property located at 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street. The Outline Development Plan accompanies the rezoning ordinance and sets allowable uses and development standards. It is general in nature and serves as a basic blueprint for development of the property. A final development plan and plat would have to be approved at a future date prior to any development occurring on the property. Planning Commission recommended denial of the request. This City Council action is related to Goal 4 of the Strategic Plan to promote I-70 as a major commercial center by providing destination retail businesses and an expanded tax base and increased property values COMMISSION/BOARD RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission reviewed this request at a public hearing held on May 19, 2005. A motion for approval ended in a 3-3 tie vote, meaning the motion failed. No further action was taken at that hearing. The application was brought back to the Commission on July 7, 2005 and a motion to recommend denial received a 4-1-2 vote. (Two members were not present at the May 19th hearing and had to abstain; one member present at the May 19'' hearing was absent from the July 7th meeting.) The Commission recommendation of denial included the following findings 1. The proposed commercial zone change is inconsistent with the Agriculture/Estate Residential designation on the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed commercial development could be incompatible with the existing residences to the north. 3. There are regional drainage issues affecting the property which are unresolved. 4. The applicant did not adequately address concerns and conditions brought up during the hearing. Under the current provisions of the Code, a Planning Commission recommendation of denial on a rezoning request is final unless the decision is appealed to city Council in writing. The decision was appealed in writing. (See Attachment 1.) One neighbor was present at the public hearing on May 190' to speak to this request. The adjacent property owner, Chuck Stiesmeyer, residing at 4996 Parfet Street, spoke regarding the parking of vehicles on Parfet Street, excessive traffic speeds on Parfet Street, lack of maintenance on the existing lots, excessive lighting on the existing lots and the extension of W. 50`" Avenue. He distributed a packet of information to Planning Commission which has been made part of the case file. The packet has not been included as part of this report because the pictures received were copies, not originals, and will not reproduce to be discernable. The copies in the case filed are available should Council members want to see them. Staff recommended to the applicant that mediation with the adjacent property owner be pursued. The applicant chose not to do so. STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES: Staff acknowledges that the development of this parcel may have a negative impact on the residences to the north; however, this is an area that is not conducive to single family residential development. The I-70 corridor continues to be developed with commercial and industrial projects including a zone change to PID to the north in 2002 and a maj or commercial center currently under construction at 50'' Avenue and Kipling. Between 1995 and 2001, the number of vehicle trips per day on I-70 increased by 5,400 to over 105,000 trips per day. This property is located within the Columbine Basin Drainage Outfall plan area. This is a major regional drainage system plan which includes properties to the northwest in Arvada, continues east through the new development at 50th Avenue and Kipling, to past Garrison Street. The plan, adopted by Urban Drainage and Flood Control District in 1994, shows required conveyance facilities on the site running north along Oak Street to W. 50`h Avenue and extending over to Parfet Street. To accommodate the new dealership, improvements between Oak and Miller must also be completed. The applicant's engineers are continuing to work on this design. The Outline Development Plan stage of the planned development process does not require an approved drainage plan and report. Staff feels the construction of W. 50`h Avenue between Oak Street and Parfet is critical. Not only would it allow a secondary access route through this industrial area but could also be used as a channel for the Columbine Basin drainage way improvements. Staff will be recommending the dedication of right-of-way at the time of final development plan and plat approval. The applicant is working towards resolution of existing code enforcement issues including lighting and lack of maintenance of landscaping. In regard to Planning Commission's second recommended condition, Public Works has indicated the east half of Parfet Street could be designed with a narrower width to restrict on-street parking. This modified street design would have to be reviewed by Public Works with the public improvement construction documents at the time of final development plan and plat. The east side of Parfet could then be signed "no parking". ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: Do not approve this request. FINANCIAL IMPACT: A one time review fee was collected for the processing of this application. Additional review fees will be required for the processing of the final development plan and plat and building permit. Sales tax revenues are generated from the sale of vehicles to Wheat Ridge residents only. Sales tax revenues will be generated by the sales of auto parts. Use tax will also be collected on any building materials. "I move to APPROVE Case No. WZ-05-05, a request for approval of a zone change from A-1, Agriculture-One and C-1, Commercial-One to Planned Commercial Development and for approval of an Outline Development Plan for property located at 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street, with the following findings: I . The majority of the property under consideration was zoned from A-1 to C-1 in 1986. 2. The design standards established for the PCD are generally consistent with the C-1 zone district design standards. 3. The proposed document meets all requirements for a Planned Commercial Development Outline Development Plan. 4. There has been a change in character in the area as evidenced by new commercial development occurring to the west of the property in the past seven years, an approved rezoning to PID to the north of the property in 2002, and construction of a major commercial center at 50'" and Kipling. 5. Although not in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan designation, the designation of Agricultural Estate Residential did not acknowledge the presence of commercial zoning on the property. Large lot residential development is inconsistent with the trend of commercial and industrial development in the area. 6. A majority of the property is already zoned commercially. The proposed zone change is compatible with the surrounding area and there will be minimal adverse impacts. 7. There will be economic benefits to the community derived from the zone change. 8. Adequate infrastructure is available to serve the proposed development. 9. The change of zone will not adversely affect the public health, safety or welfare. 10. The change of zone will not create an isolated zone district. With the following conditions: 1. Employee parking for the Medved Autoplex (all three parcels) shall be accommodated on site. There shall be no exceptions. 2. The city shall post signs prohibiting overnight parking on Parfet Street. 3. Lighting shall be designed and located such that there shall be no light trespass onto adjacent properties or streets from pole-mounted lights, wall mounted lights and lighted signs. 4. Applicant shall be required to provide a 30 foot right-of-way or easement for West 50`h Avenue extension on the north property line and/or drainage purposes. This issue shall be resolved prior to or concurrent with the final development plan and final plat. 5. The applicant shall discuss with Public Works and the Fire District the implementation and distribution of traffic calming devices on Parfet Street as part of the final development plan.,, OR "I move to table indefinitely, Council Bill 11-2005, an ordinance approving a zone change from A- 1, Agriculture-One and C-1, Commercial-One to Planned Commercial Development and for approval of an Outline Development Plan for property located at 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street for the following reasons: 1. The proposed commercial zone change is inconsistent with the Agriculture/Estate Residential designation on the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed commercial development will be incompatible with the existing residences to the north. 3. There are regional drainage issues affecting the property which are unresolved." Report Prepared by: Meredith Reckert (303-235-2848) Reviewed by: Alan White Attachments: I. Letter Appealing Planning Commission's Recommendation 2. Planning Commission staff report (with exhibits) 3. Council Bill No. 11-2005 Request for City Council Action-report form Michael G. Pharo Associates, Inc. is It iiEii t I 05 JUL - I 'l PM 12: 23July 11, 2005 Mr. Alan White Director of Planning and Development 7500 West 29`h Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215 RE: Medved Colorado, Inc. Case No. W2-05-05 Dear Mr. White: On July 7, 2005, the Wheat Ridge Planning Commission voted to recommend that our request to rezone the Medved property be denied. We hereby appeal that decision and request a full evidentiary hearing before the Wheat Ridge City Council. MGP/keh cc: John Medved Dennis Polk ATTAC!- MENT 1 2835 West Oxford Ave., #6, Englewood, Colorado 80110 • phone: 303/783-3772 • fax: 303/783-3773 • e-mail: mplandplm@aol.com ~oFW"~°'ROO CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE m PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT CO(OAPOO TO: Planning Commission CASE MANAGER: M Reckert CASE NO. & NAME: WZ-05-05Bear Land Holdings DATE OF MEETING: May 19, 2005 ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a zone change from A-1 and C-I to PCD and approval of an Outline Development Plan LOCATION OF REQUEST: 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street APPLICANT/OWNER: Michael G. Pharo Associates for Bear Land Holdings APPROXIMATE AREA: 10.59 acres PRESENT ZONING: A-1, Agriculture-One and C-1, Commercial-One COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Agricultural/Estate Residential ENTER INTO RECORD: (X) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) ZONING ORDINANCE (X) DIGITAL PRESENTATION p SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS Location Map n~-1 PID Existing Dealership Properties ,~_,y'Prop c sed Loc tion t I g g i I PCD ' A-1 PID - - - PdD EIL, Ll PID PID! C z r~ 11 ~f - G2 A-1 PID, i - r--- ~n~scacsns-c=sia H-1 Planning Commission WZ-05-05Bear Land Holdings ATTACHMENT 2 1 All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. I. REQUEST This application is for approval of a zone change from Agriculture-One and Commercial-One to Planned Commercial Development and for approval of an Outline Development Plan for properties located at 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street. The purpose of the zone change is for the construction of two new auto dealerships and an office/warehouse for parts distribution. (Exhxb~ 1,,;appltcant letier See applicant's explanation of the request z Il. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The property in question is comprised of two parcels containing a total of 10.59 acres. It is located on the eastern side of Parfet Street and extends over to Oak Street. The southern parcel is zoned C-1, Commercial-One. The northern parcel is zoned A-1, Agriculture-One. The property is relatively flat, has a house and several outbuildings on the very northern part. An open ditch (Wadsworth Ditch) runs along the north side of these buildings. Two additional open channel ditches (Bayou and Swadley) traverse the southern end of the property. Abutting the property to the north is a single family residence zoned A-1 and the detention area for the Hoss Planned Industrial Development. Although this detention area will serve the industrial development to the north, it is also zoned A-1. The L & K Industrial Park Planned Industrial Development abuts the property on the east, as does the 70 West Industrial Park which is also zoned PID. To the south is a 100' wide strip of land zoned C-1 owned by Xcel Energy. Beyond that is a triangular strip of land zoned C-2 and A-1 which has two billboards on it. This parcel separates the subject property from the north I-70 Frontage Road. The original dealership of the Medved Autoplex is located to the west, across Parfet Street. A new or used car sales facility is a special use in the Commercial-One zone district. A new or used car sales lot is not a permitted use in the A-1 zone district. Pursuant to the Zoning and Development Code, all commercial zone change applications must be to a planned development district. III. PROPERTY HISTORY The following is a brief history of the Medved Autoplex history which includes property located at 11001 W. 1-70 Frontage Road North (Chevrolet, Hummer, Cadillac), 11201 W. 1-70 Frontage Road North (Chrysler, Plymouth, Jeep and previously-owned vehicles) and vacant property on the east side of Parfet Street which is subject to this zone change request. x':ib t-2;[nom oto The property (all three parcels) was rezoned from Agriculture-One to Commercial-One pursuant to Case No. WZ-86-10. The rezoning encompassed all three parcels and included a condition that prior Planning Commission WZ-05-05Bear Land Holdings to any development, a site plan approval process be completed in front of Planning Commission and City Council. A two-lot subdivision was approved which divided the property on the west side of Parfet into two parcels (Case No. MS-86-3). A site plan was approved for the Chevrolet dealership (11001 W. I-70 Frontage Road North) with a special use permit to allow major automotive repair (Case No. SUP-86-10). In 1994, the owner applied for a planned building group plan to establish an interim used car sales operation on the westerly parcel (11201 W. I-70 Frontage Road). The interim site plan allowed for a 25' x 55' modular building to serve as a sales office. The northern half of the site was proposed as a test track for Hummer testing. In 1998, the applicant applied for an amendment to the recorded planned building group for 11201 W. I-70 Frontage Road to allow construction of two buildings containing a total of 98,000 square feet of building area. An additional building with 9000 square feet of area was proposed on the north end of the property. This building was intended to serve as a child care facility for employees. A 10' right- of-way vacation also occurred for West 50th Avenue which was dedicated back to the property owner. In 1999, the dealership was cited for having illegal vehicle storage on the vacant property on the east side of Parfet. In response to the citation, an application was submitted for approval of a temporary use permit to allow temporary vehicle storage. The request was denied by the Board of Adjustment on December 9, 1999. The applicant filed suit with the Jefferson County District Court against the City of Wheat Ridge and the Board of Adjustment. The court upheld the decision of the Board of Adjustment. IV. OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN The Outline Development Plan (ODP), which accompanies a rezoning ordinance, sets the allowable uses and development standards for the property. Typically the Outline Development Plan is general in nature and serves as the blueprint for development of the property. The Outline Development Plan is also used to establish design parameters including maximum building height, minimum landscaped coverage and minimum perimeter setbacksz b'-t3, tune be elo~in~:~Allowable uses Permitted uses include auto sales and rental, warehousing and parts distribution and repair and detailing. Staff suggested that the use list be expanded to allow test driving and general office, service and retail uses. The additional uses have been added to the ODP. Access Two access points are shown on both Parfet Street and Oak Street. Both access points align with the existing curb cuts on the dealership to the west. Development Standards The following development standards are depicted on the ODP. The existing development and any future redevelopment of the site must comply with these standards. Planning Commission WZ-05-05Bear Land Holdings Item Requirement Maximum Building and Hard Surfaced Coverage 80% Minimum Setbacks 50' from r-o-w if parking, 30' from r-o-w if landscaped (west and east) 30' from single family homes (north) 15' from external and internal property lines (south) Minimum Landscaped Coverage 20% Minimum Parking Required Refer to Section 26-501 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws for additional requirements Maximum Building Height 50' Signage Refer to Article VII of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws Fencing Refer to Section 26-603 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws Exterior Lighting Refer to Section 26-503 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws Architectural Detail Refer to the Streetscape and Architectural Design Manual Staff concludes that the proposed development standards are generally consistent with those in the Commercial-One zone district regulations. All requirements for a Planned Commercial Development Outline Development Plan have been met. V. ZONE CHANGE CRITERIA Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a change in zone. 1. That the existing zone classification currently recorded on the official zoning maps of the City of Wheat Ridge is an error. The official zoning map is not in error. The parcel is currently zoned Agriculture-One and Commercial-One. 2. That a change in character in the area has occurred due to installation of public facilities, other zone changes, new growth trends, deterioration, or development transitions, and that the evidence supports the finding of the following. Planning Commission 4 WZ-05-05Bear Land Holdings This could be considered a transitional area in the City of Wheat Ridge. Although there are four existing single-family residences to the north (along Parfet), the general trend in this neighborhood is towards more commercialization of properties. The agricultural identity of the area is diminishing, and development is transitioning towards light industrial and commercial uses. The majority of the property under consideration was rezoned from A-1 to C-1 in 1986. Land to the north of this property was rezoned from A-1 to PID pursuant to Case No. WZ-02- 12 (Hoss). The intent of the zone change was for development of an electrical contractor's yard. There are other industrial uses to the northeast of the site including Inland Container and the Rocky Mountain Bottle plant, which have undergone plan revisions and expansions in the past several years. Although not in Wheat Ridge, a major commercial development is under construction at 50a' Avenue and Kipling. The property is in close proximity to I-70 which carries increasingly more traffic each year. 1995 traffic counts indicate that 99,600 vehicles per day travel on this portion of I-70. A more recent CDOT count performed in 2001 indicated that the vehicle trips per day have increased to more than 105,000. 3. That the change of zone is in conformance, or will bring the property into conformance, with the City of Wheat Ridge comprehensive plan goals, objectives and policies, and other related policies, and other related policies or plans for the area. When the property was rezoned to C-1 in 1986, the Comprehensive Plan designated it as Industrial. The existing Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 2000. The designation on the current future land use map is Agricultural/Estate Residential (AER) (Not to exceed one unit per acre). The AER designation describes the desired character as "Neighborhoods with very low density housing and a predominantly rural character." Desired attributes include well maintained dwellings, lots comprised of primarily open lands, the ability to raise domesticated farm or ranch animals, the ability to construct accessory structures that assist in the production of value-added agricultural products, and densities not to exceed one dwelling unit per acre. The desirability of this area as estate lots within such close proximity to I-70 and adjacent commercial and industrial uses is questionable. The Comprehensive Plan Designation for the subject property is AER, but property directly to the east and further to the north is shown as Planned Business/Industrial Park. The proposed commercial zone change is inconsistent with the designation on the Comprehensive Plan. 4. That the proposed change of zone is compatible with the surrounding area and there will be minimal adverse impacts considering the benefits to be derived. The subject property is surrounded by a variety of land uses including a single family residence zoned A-1 on the northwest side of the property. On the northeast side of the property is land zoned A-1 to be utilized for detention area for a PID to the north. The PID was approved pursuant to Case No. WZ- 02-12 as a zone change from A-1. It is intended to be utilized as an electrical contractor's business. To the east is a mixture of light industrial and commercial uses. To the west are the existing dealerships and farther west commercial and industrial uses. Planning Commission 5 WZ-05-05Bear Land Holdings The zone change will be compatible with adjacent commercial and industrial uses but not the residential properties to the north along Parfet Street. 5. That there will be social, recreational, physical and/or economic benefits to the community derived by the change of zone. There will not be social, recreational or physical benefits to the community as a result of the change in zone. If the property is developed there may be an economic benefit to the city through property tax increases since the property is presently undeveloped land. Sales tax revenues from the sales of vehicles are credited to the municipality where the buyer resides. There would be sales tax generated from parts sales. 6. That adequate infrastructure/facilities are available to serve the type of uses allowed by the change of zone, or that the applicant will upgrade and provide such where they do not exist or are under capacity. All agencies can serve the property with upgrades to infrastructure, the cost of which will be bome by the applicant. 7. That the change of zone will not adversely affect public health, safety or welfare by creating excessive traffic congestion, creating drainage problems, or seriously reducing light and air to the adjacent properties. The proposed development of this parcel could have a negative affect on the residences north of the property. At the neighborhood meeting, the adjacent neighbor spoke regarding the glare and light generated by the existing dealerships. The development of this site will have an added impact on this residence. One of the major impacts of the dealership has been parking. The Zoning and Development Code requires that commercial developments provide all parking for customers, employees and inventory on-site. In each of the previous land use approvals for the dealership, the issue of cars parking on Parfet Street was addressed. The most recent approval (1999) specified that parking could occur on Parfet Street only during construction of the newest dealership. The most recent inspection showed 52 vehicles parked along Parfet. Unless this new facility addresses this parking issue and provides adequate on-site parking, the present practice of parking on Parfet will continue to adversely affect neighboring residents. There are also concerns regarding regional drainage. This property is located within the Columbine Basin Drainage Outfall plan area. According to the plan adopted by Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, there are conveyance facilities shown running north along Oak Street to W. 50a Avenue and extending over to Parfet Street. An additional conveyance facility would run adjacent to the Xcel Energy parcel to the south. Although preliminary drainage information was provided, it is unclear at this time whether the proposal can a accommodate the Columbine Basin improvementsits ,#ColumbmeBase f ae~ Planning Commission 6 WZ-05-05Bear Land Holdings 8. That the change of zone will not create an isolated or spot zone district unrelated to adjacent or nearby areas. Spot zoning is not a concern as there is other commercial zoning in the area. VL WEST 50THAVENUE The issue of extension of W. 50°i Avenue has been debated since the original parcel on the west side of Parfet was platted. W. 50th Avenue currently extends from Miller to Oak Street, east of the subject parcel and from Robb Street east where it dead-ends into a cul-de-sac on 11201 W. I-70 Frontage Road North (western Autoplex parcel). 1986: In the mid-1980's, an amendment was made to the Major Streets Plan of the Comprehensive Plan. This amendment designated an arterial street corridor between Klpling Street and Ward Road. Since 500i was a logical extension, 40' of right-of way was dedicated for 500' Avenue as part of the two-lot subdivision approval on the parcel on the west side of Parfet in 1986. 1994: During the 1994 Planned Building Group approval for an interim used car sales operation on 11201 W. I-70 Frontage Road North, the applicant indicated that he felt it was premature to develop 500i Avenue at the time, but would be willing to participate when the time was appropriate. A condition of City Council approval was that W. 500i be constructed on both sections of the Medved property when a building permit for the western parcel is issued. 1998: As part of the PBG review for a permanent dealership on 11201 W. I-70 Frontage Road, street construction plans for 50th Avenue were reviewed and it was indicated that these improvements should be completed on both lots connecting to Parfet prior to issuance of a C.O. The street extension was needed as the plan relied on 50th Avenue for the unloading of vehicles on the north end. The plan was approved by City Council on July 13 but was reconsidered at the next meeting (July 27). The reconsideration allowed construction of a cul-de-sac off 50th on the north side of the property (in lieu of full street extension) with the vacation of the southern 10' of that right-of-way. Further, that the designation for 50th be changed from an arterial to a collector and that 500i Avenue would only be completed if and when the residential properties to the east on Parfet are developed for industrial or commercial uses. 2000: The new Comprehensive Plan is adopted. The connection of 50th Avenue between Parfet and Oak Street is deleted on the Roadway Classification Map. 2003: During the final development plan and plat hearings for Case No. WZ-03-08 (Ross PID), Public Works requested a 25' wide dedication for 500' Avenue extending west from Oak Street. The purpose was to reserve one-half of the right-of-way width in the event 50 is extended from Oak Street to Parfet. This condition was not included in the motion for approval and no right-of-way dedication occurred. Planning Commission WZ-05-05Bear Land Holdings Staff feels the construction of W. 50`h Avenue between Oak Street and Parfet is still critical. Not only would it allow a secondary access route through this industrial area but could also be used as a channel for the Columbine Basin drainageway improvements. Staff will be recommending the dedication of right-of-way at the time of final development plan and plat approval. VII. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING A meeting for neighborhood input was held on May 18, 2004 (Exhibir6~ i`IeighborhoodMeehng Recap and Exhxbxt ~;~ttenlarice Ltstj VIII. AGENCY REFERRALS All affected service agencies were contacted regarding the ability to serve the property. The developer will be responsible for any needed upgrades to accommodate the proposed development. Specific referral responses follow. Arvada Fire Protection District: AFPD expressed concern regarding life safety and fire department access due to the congestion on Parfet Street by employee parking. They are strongly recommending that any land use approvals be considered to relieve this parking congestion. Ditch Companies: The three affected ditch companies want to review changes to the current ditch configurations as part of the final development plan and plat process. Valley Water District: Valley Water District has adequate capacity to serve the project. Additional water main lines, fire hydrants or fire sprinkler lines may be needed. Urban Drainage and Flood Control District: UDFCD does not usually object to zone changes, but has concerns with this one. The preliminary drainage information provided deviates from the approved Columbine Basin Outfall Systems Plan. They would prefer to have an open channel system and are not sure this can be accommodated with the intensity of the development being proposed. Public Works Department: The Public Works Department has reviewed preliminary drainage and traffic information. They have requested additional information be provided at the time of final development plan and plat. This would include a Traffic Impact Study analyzing the proposed affect on I-70 Frontage Road North. Public Works recommends future construction of W. 50`s Avenue, and that sufficient right-of-way be dedicated at the time of final development plan and plat. In regards to storm sewer issues, Public Works will require sufficient right-of-way to construct the drainage facilities as described in the Columbine Basin, Outfall Systems Planning. Construction of the facilities will be required at the time of construction of the Autoplex expansion. The proposed development will require extension of the Arvada Channel from Miller Street to Oak Street to service the property. The City may assist Medved in the construction of the Arvada Channel by participating in partial reimbursement if necessary. Extension of the Arvada Channel from Oak Street to Parfet may also be required to service the proposed expansion development and/or the existing Medved Autoplex. IX. FINDINGS OF FACT/RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS Staff has made the following findings of fact. Planning Commission WZ-05-05Bear Land Holdings 1. The majority of the property under consideration was rezoned from A-1 to C-1 in 1986. 2. The design parameters shown are generally consistent with the C-1 zone district regulations. 3. The proposed document meets all requirements for a Planned Commercial Development Outline Development Plan. 4. There has been a change in character in the area as evidenced by new commercial development occurring to the west of the property in the past seven years, an approved rezoning to PID to the north of the property in 2002, and construction of a major commercial center at 50`s and Kipling. 5. Although not in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan designation, the designation of Agricultural Estate Residential did not acknowledge the presence of commercial zoning on the property. Large lot residential development is inconsistent with the trend of commercial and industrial development in the area. 6. A majority of the property is already zoned commercially. The proposed zone change is compatible with the surround area and there will be minimal adverse impacts. 7. There will be economic benefits to the community derived from the zone change. 8. Adequate infrastructure is available to serve the proposed development. 9. The change of zone will not adversely affect the public health, safety or welfare. 10. The change of zone will not create an isolated zone district. Staff would suggest the following conditions be included in a motion for recommendation of approval: 1. All parking for the Medved Autoplex (all three parcels) shall be accommodated on site. There shall be no exceptions. 2. Lighting shall be designed and located such that there shall be no light trespass onto adjacent properties or streets from pole mounted lights, wall mounted lights and lighted signs. 3. Adequate right-of-way dedications for Oak Street, W. 50`h Avenue and Columbine Basin storm water drainage facilities occur at the time of final development plan and plat. X. SUGGESTED MOTIONS: Option A: "I move to recommend APPROVAL of Case No. WZ-05-05, a request for approval of a zone change from Agriculture-One and Commercial-One to Planned Commercial Development and for approval of an Outline Development Plan for properties located at 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street: 1. The majority of the property under consideration was zoned from A-1 to C-1 in 1986. 2. The design parameters shown are generally consistent with the C-1 zone district. 3. The proposed document meets all requirements for a Planned Commercial Development Outline Development Plan. 4. There has been a change in character in the area as evidenced by new commercial development occurring to the west of the property in the past seven years, an approved rezoning to PID to the north of the property in 2002, and construction of a major commercial center at 50a' and Kipling. 5. Although not in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan designation, the designation of Agricultural Estate Residential did not acknowledge the presence of commercial zoning on the property. Large lot residential development is inconsistent with the trend of commercial and industrial development in the area. Planning Commission 9 WZ-05-05Bear Land Holdings 6. A majority of the property is already zoned commercially. The proposed zone change is compatible with the surround area and there will be minimal adverse impacts. 7. There will be economic benefits to the community derived from the zone change. 8. Adequate infrastructure is available to serve the proposed development. 9. The change of zone will not adversely affect the public health, safety or welfare. 10. The change of zone will not create an isolated zone district. With the following conditions 1. All parking for the Medved Autoplex (all three parcels) shall be accommodated on site. There shall be no exceptions. 2. Lighting shall be designed and located such that there shall be no light trespass onto adjacent properties or streets from pole mounted lights, wall mounted lights and lighted signs. 3. Adequate right-of-way dedications for Oak Street, W. 50`h Avenue and Columbine Basin storm water drainage facilities shall occur at the time of final development plan and plat." Option B: "I move to recommend DENIAL of Case No. WZ-05-05, a request for approval of a zone change from Agriculture-One and Commercial-One to Planned Commercial Development and for approval of an Outline Development Plan for properties located at 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street: 1. The proposed commercial zone change is inconsistent with the Agriculture/Estate Residential designation on the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed commercial development could be incompatible with the existing residences to the north. 3. There are regional drainage issues affecting the property which are unresolved." Planning Commission 10 W7-05-0511lear Land Holdings Michael G. Pharo Associates, Inc. March 25, 2005 Ms. Meredith Reckert Senior Planner City of Wheat Ridge 7500 West 291h Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215 Re: Medved Colorado : Rezoning Dear Ms. Reckert: Enclosed is our rezoning submittal for the Medved property in Wheat Ridge, Colorado. This submittal consists of an Outline Development Plan, traffic study, preliminary drainage study and other supporting documentation as required. The submittal fee of $2475.00 is also enclosed. This rezoning is to allow expansion of the existing Medved facilities. This development will occur in a manner consistent with applicable City regulations. At this time, we anticipate a phased development consisting of an initial new car dealership, an area of inventory parking, a service and parts storage facility and ultimately another new car dealership. Of particular interest is the manner in which the property drains. In order to move the property forward in a timely manner, we are proposing to utilize a temporary retention pond until such time as the City, Medved, Urban Drainage and Flood Control Authority, perhaps the County, and others can find a cost effective way of implementing off-site drainage facilities. We will be constructing the retention pond concurrent with the initial new car dealership and phasing the development into a permanent drainage solution as quickly as practical. We anticipate working with your Public Works Department to arrive at a workable solution to the drainage issues prior to processing the ODP. Please let me know if I can do more at this time. MGP/las c: John Medved Dennis Polk Marshall Fishman EXHIBIT I 2835 West Oxford Ave., #6, Englewood, Colorado 80110 0 phone: 303/783-3772 • fax: 303/783-3773 • e-mail: mplmdplan@aol.com ~ - .m,. _ ~ ~ _ ____~m~___. SL w" i ':..'c..v~.. f ~ l 1 a - - ,e. ~,aa~c x ~ .x... ,~,__f...~ t • V~ u in e e A Pa rcel ~f L~~~.d L~.:~ V1C1111~ Le PAR A T W 64Tx AVE. SOU THE ~ ' =f - a A r BEII CO W. 5$TH AVE. SEC SO TO NOR ~ AT SAI SUBJECT ~ I_~a ALO 3 wA AN W ~rx AVE. ALO NO CO CO-58 OF- W38TH AVE. 247. q THE S, f y_ ~ PA W. 321'1D AVE. ~ TO Y v F-~ Ex, SO SO Q ~ ~ BE ~ ~ _ ' Cw7 ~ 3 CO ST O _ -i__ a ' L ~ W. COLFAX AVE. P - n ~Sne soon TH ' ~ / I ~ NORTH ~ SEC SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL ~ \ ~ MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: o ~y, ~./kf~l. ~/S 1J 111 }~`4✓ 1...11 li6-i. F.. L's _ _ - Qca lad. at ~c ME BE SO Character of Development: so The property will be developed as an extension of the Medved Autoplex located to the TH west. Through logical extensions of vehicular access routes and edge treatment, the P SAi property will consist of two new automotive dealerships and a distribution center LE consisting of offices, servicing and warehousing. Development will be consistent with QU r the goals, policies and objectives of the City of Wheat Ridge. TH EX TH Statement of Proposed Zoning: y 6 Y •'•ti.p 1 ;.~:w; peat Ride Code of Laws. - o •;1 ~ xtertc BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE ~ tln e 1 5:.X1 ' 4 ~ ` ~I~ SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID Z s SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, 528 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO >';4~`l' ~y THE EAST LINE OF PARFET STREET; THENCE SOUTH, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF r ~itect~ ~ -aura c rc to r - ~Illi.r~lrl m r~ ~n•t ^.~!^4b"f'!,• - PARFET STREET, 247.5 FEET; THENCE EAST, PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF Perimete SAill SOUTHEAST QUAkTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, 528 B'EE'T, iVIOR~ OR Landscapi LESS, TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTEK OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 247.5 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO ! THE POINT OF BEGINNING, i- EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1329 AT PAGE 127 OF Dealers Locati THE JEFFERSON COUNTY RECORDS, z This rezoning request is intended to consolidate existing parcels of land zoned CO Agriculture-One (A-1) and Commercial-One (G 1) into a Planned Commercial Zone for ST the purpose of expanding the existing Medved Autoplex. This use of the property is COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, `O STATE OF COLORADO. ~ ~~~G ~ . ,~¢o , { rn consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado a:. 3 w~~ i stated in the Comprehensive Plan. Subsequent Site Plan submittals will detail the S specific nature of the architecture and landscape improvements. ,v Surveyors Certification: - ~ i-~--- s I, R stat sam I, Roger A. Vermaas P.L.S. 24968, a duly registered professional land surveyor in the N 2 state of Colorado, do hereby certify that the lands described and shown heron are the o ~ 5~~ ti F same lands as surveyed by me or under my direct supervision and checking, prepared in o accordance with Colorado State Statutes 38-51-106. Z i i Ownership Statement: a~~ The owner of the property is Bear Land Holdings, LLC, dba Medved Colorado. ~ I-7 Roger A. Vermaas r Ro Unified Control Statement: co The owner of the property which pertains to this Outline Development Plan(ODP), Bear Colorado Professional Land Surveyor P.L.S. 24968 Land Holdings, LLC, dba Medved Colorado, intends to retain ownership of all ODP d' ~ _ i components and accepts responsibility for all exterior maintenance on the property. ii i' .t d . S Owner's Certification: r, The below-signed owner, or legally designated agent thereof, does hereby agree that the e f property legally described hereon will be developed as a Planned Commercial C Development in accordance with the uses, restrictions and conditions contained in this Community Development Director: -'K._ ,k plan, and as may otherwise be required by law. Owner further recognizes that the r i ~ approval of rezoning to Planned Commercial Development, and approval of this Outline _ _ k Development Plan, does not create a vested property right. Vested property rights may Community Development Director only arise and accrue pursuant to the provisions of Section 26-121 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws. S Bear Land Holdings, LLC Pl L~ } Planning Commission Certification: i r Re the Recommended for approval this day of , 20 , by the Wheat Ridge Planr:ng Commission. ~ - By: John Medved Medved Colorado 11001 W. Frontage Road N. Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Chairman NOTARY PUBLIC Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of , 20 c rti~cation: County C~~~~ and R y This document accepted for filing Clt Council Ce a,._. ,.r ~n h~, r P _ _ . ap approvea finis uay v1 Jefferson County at Golden, Colo i .E „»nrin osra I- aYnAr !1T II I r1 i w Witness my hand and official seal. Wheat Ridge City Council. in Book ,Page l _ 2005 My commission expires A t t Attest: JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK i City Clerk Mayor Notary Seal: Recorder Cit City Seal: f f t Ira'!: - --5 •~'~~li MAYCk { \ City\ Of Arvada D4 - ~4 v('//, - ±0 TO 39+00 -41 y' Y / N9b TO 2 G t J~~ r O C ~_4 y / 1 4 t ~JS/I ' • 4F: CE55 y. `CYr~~ 5 U-4 _)i- EXTEND LOCAL COLLE~R - ~ ST )2 ` /1 i LWE AS.NEEDEO ry„ - _ r .-e sofir, PHCP sT w I MCP , RON T~ rv ~ ~ ~ Y / Ilf. I 'e2J I ~ 137 ~ STA 9Q 1 li \~il 9_ ` T„- T02+24 t f pp.35%Oy' Fj-_J~ ;City -a Mlheat=Ridge ~ao s I _ I i r' RE01NilE0 ~ ` 1 I vc c o - - t~ P6CiL now ; ~ I 'I 35% to 1g~03~0y- I03c1s w d 5 ~ ss (gTO.03% I, JC7 `2" • ~ I ._J r. _f f i ' / _ a~-T-~ R ~ l5 ATIVAD JG. >pri. ~S - W I i TA 13~ ITO ~2+20 400 LF 20-RCP ®1.1% 5TA 148+20 TO 153+2 05.22,1• 5000 LF 49'RCP Q0.4% r,- _.LQ Lr' 6 . • c-`C - STA 102+20 TO 105+00 •T^- 200 LF 24-RCP ®1STA 153+20 TO 155+20 O s=22,1• 500 LF 49-RCP 00.5% r % 7 n P r %q~'.1L~ STA 195+00 TO 170+00 •,~~-fly Q.~ j¢~., ~PoDd 500 LF 24-RCP 01.1% STA 142+20 TO 143120 ❑ 'i'-' PR01oESBE7EN7'lON FOR STORMS Oy>=9et• too LF 48-RCP (PO.sx F 1 GREATER THAN 10-YR FREQUENCY o'.107,1• y, NO IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED STA 170+00 TO 174+00 s~ N ?L 1 400 LF 24-RCP ® C'S% STA 143+20 TO 149+20 (CITY OF ARMADA OWNERS/i) 0F:909, S00 LF 49-RCP 00.5% I'' 5 r`n OS=107,9, GENERAL NOTES l 1.) DDS OUIFALL RNDe1G DOCACNT 6 OD04OUp µ ONLY. TK dfIFALL SYSTEM S q PROAOFS A NA1OR DRNy1GE NE7HJR1 9TIHN THE PRQELT 9Gt9NAIN. ' tom 9RERCFPId6 9LL K REQUIRED TO SERVE TRWARE AREAS IIPSTRFAA1 OF AM AM4EVIT TO THE PROPOSED WIFALL SYSM& AIL FTATURES S,,, (0440CA SRDGM STORK SEWERS, OUD0 PONDS ETC.) ARE PROPOSED uN1Lti5 N31FD AS EDSTNG 2.) UTLMES 9q ARE S1SEU ON WORIMOM SUPPLED Sr LOLL GOhROpL15 NO MAY OOYPMM P1 VIEW LOC•106 ARE APPROXONTC TIE ELEVATONI OF NL UTLMM S1 ARE BASED ON TOIM COVER DO MS OR AS DDCA70 Bl VDWC DATA PWDVGEII. tERRGTION OF URPiY I TXN AND DEPM 6 NftFSSVR PRM TO RNN DES" OF THESE WSTER PL MED FAOUnM 3.) ALL GUVATXD6 9 N PUN AND PROBE ARE EASED 0T A DATUM ESUW9ED FOR THS FROELT yDPW1G 4.) RU3 LOCQDNS NE %H M AT SnE ATIC IDGTIp6 OH,Y. So,,E, WAS ARDH 6 REO RED. 1) , ON-91E DEMMM 6 RENSIDTDFD FOR DEVODPNQl6 TR®.RN1E TO THE ARVA,, OWDEL TOOL JXIRpATO6 NE PESPON9HE FOR DREIEMAEDN 6 ON-SE DEIOOON FM MEW DEVEIOPMDM 200 0 ow Opp CWTib. t1MVlT n: lA4MR NAAAeY p•.ti.. Aley rwprp••.wn n: •ooT •a.erAe neNlu canny HULLER FNG WQJFFRRllVG COMPANY, INC. ®°FO TaPO••w.nc Y...H n.lAb•.M earre• EXHIBIT 4 afire rt•R wv ,4+M TJI9DVRXr°•WO CE AOOUIEVAp9 py URBAN DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Alt 4•TATgplyl YlA• YA Ll.n ••ru< OOD' i00LO~s y CITY OF ARVADA CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE COLUMBINE BASIN 10 m e.. cave. enw wyTO•.a .4. AcwA~ aruo.•0y. OUTFALL SYSTEM PLANNING ••D•' .•p44er •..9032 1 eM rlwroar•T ury d. _ TO 29+d0 QA 137+ AASS-LU D.35% C `f °y 6: i - ~rGtr - / / i- ;A. ` , , 80 IF_.a4^"RCP i" 'x,-00.5%, y5=51?,c}S J ~ accts X11 U , i DOl PSCO, ROW X REPURE.D UIRED t~TCH o ] f ST 'Y colt7 3 GR C SF!' ROW O~11RE0 ; O STA 80) \ @q5% Cis= tt1 c4 ` F .Y L. -DC xa' ~KC: ~ts Aide--~ @0.35% - EXHIBIT 5 CQ. 'r IGRAW-1 @0.3~,% O, INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER Council Bill No. 11-2005 Ordinance No. Series of 2005 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE FROM A-1, AGRICULTURE-ONE AND C-1, COMMERCIAL-ONE TO PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPEMENT AND FOR APPROVAL OF AN OUTLINE DEVELOPEMENT PLAN FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4900 AND 4990 PARFET STREET (CASE NO. WZ-05-05) BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO THAT: Section 1. Upon application by Michael G. Pharo Associates for Bear Land Holdings, approval of a zone change from A-1, Agriculture-One and C-1, Commercial-One to Planned Commercial Development and for approval of an Outline Development Plan for property located at 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street and pursuant to the findings made based on testimony and evidence presented at a public hearing before the Wheat Ridge City Council, a zone change and Outline Development Plan are approved for the following described land: PARCEL A: A TRACT OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16; THENCE NORTH 00°01' 12" EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, 448.01 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF THE DENVER AND NORTHWESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT-OF- WAY AS RECORDED IN BOOK 126 AT PAGE 583 IN THE CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 74°07'34" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT- OF-WAY, 549.56 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF PARFET STREET AS RECORDED IN BOOK 155 AT PAGE 424 IN THE CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE OF JEFFERSON COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 00°04'24" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY, 96.86 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID DENVER AND NORTHWESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF PARFET STREET NORTH 00°06'56" WEST, 633.78 FEET TO A POINT BEING 247.50 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE ATTACHMENT 3 SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16; THENCE NORTH 89°43'46" EAST, PARALLEL WITH AND 247.50 FEET DISTANT WHEN MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID NORTH LINE, 530.21 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16; THENCE SOUTH 00°01' 12" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 582.83 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. PARCEL B: THAT PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, 528 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EAST LINE OF PARFET STREET; THENCE SOUTH, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF PARFET STREET, 247.50 FEET; THENCE EAST, PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, 528 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 247.50 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1329 AT PAGE 127 OF THE JEFFERSON COUNTY RECORDS, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. Section 2. Vested Property Rights. Approval of this zone change and Outline Development Plan does not create a vested property right. Vested property rights may only arise and accrue pursuant to the provisions of Section 26-121 of the Code of Laws of the City of Wheat Ridge. Section 3. Safety Clause. The City of Wheat Ridge hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is promulgated under the general police power of the City of Wheat Ridge, that it is promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare of the public and that this ordinance is necessary for the preservation of health and safety and for the protection of public convenience and welfare. The City Council further determines that the ordinance bears a rational relation to the proper legislative object sought to be attained. Section 4. Severability. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, or part of this Zoning Code or the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall for any reason be adjusted by a court of competent jurisdiction invalid, such judgment shall not affect application to other persons or circumstances. Section 5. Supersession Clause. If any provision, requirements or standard established by this Ordinance is found to conflict with similar provisions, requirements or standards found elsewhere in the Code of Laws of the City of Wheat Ridge, which are in existence as of the date of adoption of this Ordinance, the provisions, requirements and standards here shall supersede and prevail. Section 6 . This Ordinance shall take effect 15 days after final publication. INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first reading by a vote of to on this 27a' day of June, 2005, ordered published in full in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Wheat Ridge and Public Hearing and consideration on final passage set for July 25, 2005, at 7:00 o'clock p.m., in the Council Chambers, 7500 West 29`s Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final reading by a vote of to , this day of 2005. SIGNED by the Mayor on this day of 2005. GRETCHEN CERVENY, MAYOR ATTEST: Pamela Y. Anderson, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM BY CITY ATTORNEY GERAL DAHL, CITY ATTORNEY 1St publication: 2nd publication: Wheat Ridge Transcript Effective Date: 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 303/ 235-2846 Fax: 303/235-2857 The City of Wheat Ridge Date: May 18, 2004 City Staff Present: Meredith Reckert Location of meeting: City Hall second floor glass conference room Property address: 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street Property owner(s): Medved Colorado Property Owner(s) present? No. Applicant: Mike Pharo (land planning consultant), Wendell Ayers (civil engineering consultant) Existing Zoning: C-1 (Commercial-One) on southern two-thirds and A-1 (Agriculture-One) on northern one-third Comprehensive Plan Designation: AER, Agricultural Estate Residential (Not to exceed one unit per acre) Existing Use/Site Conditions: The property is located north of the north I-70 Frontage Road and is comprised of 10 acres of land running between Parfet and Oak Streets. There is an existing residence with out-buildings on the A-1 parcel. The rest of the property is vacant. The property is relatively flat with three ditches that traverse it. Applicant's Proposal: Applicant is proposing to rezone the property to Planned Commercial Development. The development of the property would be in two phases; the first phase would be to develop a parking area to alleviate overflow parking on Parfet Street by employees and inventory. The second phase would be for full development of the property including an additional car dealership, a warehouse with service center and the parking and display and storage of automobiles. Issues Discussed: The city of Wheat Ridge has a requirement for the separation of adjacent display lots. Won't this violate that separation requirement? Relief from the 1500' separation requirement can be sought through either a special use permit process or through a planned development zone change application. Will there be economic gain to the city if this is approved? • Impact of the project on traffic in the area. EXHIBIT 6 • Parking of employee vehicles on Parfet. It was noted that a parking study may be required as a part of the application. • What will happen with Oak Street? It is presently substandard to the city's requirement for local streets and a 30' right-of-way dedication will be required. • Will 50th Avenue be extended between Oak and Parfet? The neighbors in attendance do not support the construction of 50th. It was also noted that City Council did not require dedication of the north side of 50th Avenue during recent land use approval action directly to the north of the subject site. • What will happen to the ditches on the property? The applicant indicated that they will be piped. • Sight distance, excessive speeds and safety on Parfet Street. • Internal policies on the existing Medved car lots which exacerbate negative impacts on Parfet Street. • Noise generated by the existing car lots. • Lighting on the existing and proposed car lots. It was noted that a photometric plan would be required with the zoning application for final development plan approval. • Security and problems related to vandalism on the existing Medved lots. • Proposed signage on the property • Status of the billboards on adjacent property to the south. Chuck Stiesmeyer, 4996 Parfet Street, submitted digital photos of vehicles parked on Parfet Street and views from his property to the west. He also submitted photos of lighting on commercial properties in the area, as well as a newspaper article regarding light pollution. ,p co J C~ Cn A w N 1 v ) 1 o q o. IL r D cn m .o D m z m ~ G) o C) = a) :3 D W 0 Z to t, m < Z co o CL D w N = ~ C o N o O v M C D cn x m N rV ~ U) N A~ i 0 <D EXHIBIT 7 POSTING CERTIFICATION CASE NOA~M PLANNING COMMISSION / CITY COUNCIL / BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (Circle One) HEARING DA I ~ residing at 1 meyt _ „ # ddres as the applicant for Case No.~ hereby certify that I have posted the Notice of Public Hearing at (location) -~5 and do hereby certify that on this day o l 2Q0 said sign has been posted ar d re fined in place for fifteen (15) days prior to and including the scheduled day of public hearing of this case. The sign was posted in the position shown on the map below. case and will be placed in the m w N NOTE: This form must be submitted at the public hearing on applicant's case file at the Department of Planning and Devel 7500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Wheat Ridge FAX 303/235-2857 July 11, 2005 Dear Property Owner: This is to inform you of Case No. WZ-05-05 which is a request for approval of a rezoning from Commercial-One (C-1) and Agricultural-One (A-1) to Planned Commercial Development (PCD) and approval of an outline development plan for properties located at 4900 & 4990 Parfet Street. This request will be heard by the Wheat Ridge City Council in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue. The meeting will be held on July 25, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. As an area resident or interested parry, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. If you are a property owner within 100 feet of this property, you may have the right to file a legal protest against the application which would require 3/4 majority vote of City Council to approve the request. A copy of the protest rights section of the code is enclosed. If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at 303-235-2846. Thank you. Planning Division. C Oocumen% and Settin sl thyWyD wments\ athyTC"TS\PI.A GCOWenotice\2005\w 505.w d z-cis - - MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Steismeyer Charles Parcel :042703 Site :4996 Parfet St Wheat Ridge 80033 xfprp(l :09/24/1997 Mail :4996 Parfet St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 7004 2890 0001 6401 3209 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land ------Ynone-_-_-r Bedrm:l Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1929 Pool: B1dgSF:624 Ac:.41 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Hoss David C Parcel :042775 Site :5130 Parfet St Wheat Ridge 80033 7pp4 2890 0001 6401 3179 Mail :5130 Parfet St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 ,Y.,~~,vo o-Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm:5 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1960 Pool: BldgSF:1,189 Ac:3.48 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Bear Land Holdings Llc Parcel :043765 Site :4990 Parfet St Wheat Ridge 80033 Yf---A .nAt7G17^^" Mail :11001 W I-70 Frontage Rd N Wheat Ridge Co 80033 7004 2890 0001 640.1 3247 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone--- Bedrm:3 Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1927 Pool: B1dgSF:1,017 Ac:2.58 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Powell Vaudis M Parcel :043769 Site :11221 W 1-70 Frontage Rd S Wheat Ridge 80033 "7004 2890001 6401 3155 Mail :PO Box 415 Victorville Ca 92393 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm:2 Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1929 Pool: BldgSF:624 Ac:1.91 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :National Advertising Company Parcel :043805 Site :4800 Parfet St Wheat Ridge 80033 Vf---' • " Mail :185 Us Highway 46 Fairfield Nj 07004 7004 2890 0001 6401 3230 Use :2111 Vacant,Commercial Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: BldgSF: Ac:.43 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Bellegante John A Parcel :043850 Site :4760 Parfet St Wheat Ridge 80033 Mail :4760 Parfet St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 7004 2890 0001 6401 3223 Use :5178 Misc,Residential,Mixed Use Land Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm:l YB:1941 Pool: B1dgSF:1,816 Ac:.92 : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Wehling Frank W Parcel :043918 Site :5006 Parfet St wheat Ridge 80033 7004 2890 0001 6401 3216 Mail :5006 Parfet St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Use :4141 Agr,Grazing Land Phone Bedrm:3 Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1942 Pool: BldgSF:1,500 Ac:1.86 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner >:City f Wheat Rid Parcel :052458 Site I 7 rvice Rd #I70 Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :03/24/1999 Mail Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use nd, roved Land Phone Bedrmath: TotRm:l YB:1972 Pool: BldgSF:38,685 Ac*2.86 ----MetroScan / Jefferson (C O) Owner :National Advertising Co Parcel :136632 Site :*n Site Address*__. Xfered :04/04/1977 Mail :185 Highway A-6 Fairfield Nj 07004 Price :$7,300 Use :1111 Vac .-Residential Phone Bedrm: Ba-tPi: TotRm: YB: Pool: BldgSF: Ac*.Bl MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Lic Investments Inc Parcel :17cr?l Site :5000 Oak St wheat Ridge 80033 7004 2890 0001 6401 3162 Mail :PO Box 1149 Austin Tx 78767 - --rrrce Use- :3111 Vacant,Industrial Phone Bedrm: Bath: TctRm: YB: Pool: BldgSF: Ac:.98 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Bear. and Holdings''~~~. Parcel :193121 Site :11001 70 vices e Rd #I70 Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :07/01/1997 Mail :11001 N I 7 rvice Rd #I70 Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :2112 Cqm Improve Land Phone Bedrm: ,Bath: TotRm:l YB:1987 Pool: BldgSF:58,202 Ac:8.86 Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Bear- La Holdings Llc Parcel : 193681 Site :*no Site Ad s* Xfered : 04/30/2004 Mail :11001 W I-70 Fr9 ge Rd N Wheat Ridge Co 8003 3 Price Use :1155 Vaca esiden al Phone Bedrm: the TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF: Ac:8 .12 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :New World Ventures Llc Parcel : 401510 3254 Site :4950 Oak St Wheat Ridge 80033 7p134 28 90 0001 6401 Mail :5875 N Rogers Ave Chicago Il 60646 - - Use :3112 Ind,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm:l YB:1984 Pool: B1dgSF: 34,476 Ac:2 .15 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Cytrynbaum Mary Parcel : 401511 Site :4980 Oak St Wheat Ridge 80033 ^ 7004 2890 0001 6401 3193 Mail :4530 S Vorrena Denver Co Use :3112 Ind,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm:l YB:1983 Pool: B1dgSF: 20,304 Ac:1 .23 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Colorado Industrial Portfolio Llc Parcel : 401512 Site :10790 W 50th Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 7pp4 2890 0001 6401 31 86 Mail :1512 Larimer St #325 Denver Co 80202 Use :3112 Ind,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm:l YB:1985 Pool: B1dgSF: 35,870 Ac:2 .25 Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. O JEFFERSON ECONOMIC COUNCIL 7(2!05 July 21, 2005 Mr. Alan White, Director Community Development Department City of Wheat Ridge - Municipal Building 7500 West 29th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 Re: Medved Hummer Project Dear Alan: I am writing to support the Medved Hummer proposal. My understanding is that the property is zoned properly for the project and that the site plan is being reviewed for approval. The Jefferson Economic Council supports job growth and capital investment, which this project brings to the area. Through vehicle sale and service, and parts sales, a significant amount of revenue will be derived from the project. Furthermore, this facility will be a destination, or magnet which will bring attention and economic activity to the area. Jefferson County is short of employment opportunities. In fact, we have what is commonly called a "jobs/housing imbalance". In rough numbers, we have about 300,000 people in our workforce, however we have only about 200,000 jobs. This imbalance causes more than one-half of our residents to leave the county for work in other areas of the Denver metropolitan region. The jobs that will be created by this project will help us reach our vision of a complete jobs/housing balance. Thank you for the opportunity to provide these comments. Sincerely,l V z~ Preston E. Gibson PresidentICEO Board of County Commissioners tit d Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner City of Wheat Ridge 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 July 12, 2005 Dear Ms. Reckert: Jim Congrove District No. 1 J. Kevin McCasky District No. 2 Dave Auburn District No. 3 The County is in receipt of your July 1, 2005 Major Activity Notice for 4990 Parfet Street. As we understand it, this notice was for the expansion of Medved onto two adjacent lots proposed to be rezoned to allow automotive uses. The County does not have any concerns with this rezoning request. Sincerely, ok/ Tim Carl, Director Planning and Development CC: Nanette Neelan, Transportation Director Patrick Thompson, County Administrator 100 Jefferson County Parkway, Golden, Colorado 80419 (303) 279-6511 http://jeffco.us H1NON'111W Woe e & a a . Q o a 6°~'a p gC' R 3 M O a O a X0 0 F • w ° w \ ~ ~ w M I^-~ V O eTeT 3E~ ~d 8" F ¢J 03 i 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 303.235.2846 Fax: 303.235.2857 July 1, 2005 Colorado State Geologist Re: Major Activity Notice Dear Sir or Madame: The City of Wheat Ridge This letter is provided in accordance with C.R.S. 31-23-225 to provide notice to your office that the City of Wheat Ridge has received a request to establish zoning on approximately 10 acres of land located at 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street. The City Council will consider the zoning request at a public hearing on July 25, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the Wheat Ridge Municipal Building at 7500 W. 29`s Avenue, Wheat Ridge. CO 80033. Please contact this office at 303-235-2846 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Meredith Reckert, AICP Senior Planner 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 303.235.2846 Fax: 303.235.2857 The City of Wheat Ridge July 1, 2005 Jefferson County Commissioners Re: Major Activity Notice Dear County Commissioners:: This letter is provided in accordance with C.R.S. 31-23-225 to provide notice to your office that the City of Wheat Ridge has received a request to establish zoning on approximately 10 acres of land located at 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street. The City Council will consider the zoning request at a public hearing on July 25, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the Wheat Ridge Municipal Building at 7500 W. 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge. CO 8Q033. Please contact this office at 303-235-2846 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Meredith Reckert, AICP Senior Planner City of Wheat Ridge of ""EgTP Community Development Department Memorandum CpGpRpO~ TO: Planning Commission FROM: Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Final Action - Case No. WZ-05-05 DATE: June 29, 2005 On May 19, 2005, Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding a request for zone change from A-1 and C-1 to Planned Commercial Development and for approval of an Outline Development Plan for property located at 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street. A motion was made to approve the request with the following findings: 1. The majority of the property under consideration was zoned from A-1 to C-1 in 1986. 2. The design parameters shown are generally consistent with the C-1 zone district. 3. The proposed document meets all requirements for a Planned Commercial Development Outline Development Plan. 4. There has been a change in character in the area as evidenced by new commercial development occurring to the west of the property in the past seven years, an approved rezoning to PID to the north of the property in 2002, and construction of a major commercial center at 50`h and Kipling. 5. Although not in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan designation, the designation of Agricultural Estate Residential did not acknowledge the presence of commercial zoning on the property. Large lot residential development is inconsistent with the trend of commercial and industrial development in the area. 6. A majority of the property is already zoned commercially. The proposed zone change is compatible with the surrounding area and there will be minimal adverse impacts. 7. There will be economic benefits to the community derived from the zone change. 8. Adequate infrastructure is available to serve the proposed development. 9. The change of zone will not adversely affect the public health, safety or welfare. 10. The change of zone will not create an isolated zone district. With the following conditions: 1. Employee parking for the Medved Autoplex (all three parcels) shall be accommodated on site. There shall be no exceptions. 2. The city shall post signs prohibiting overnight parking on Parfet Street 3. Lighting shall be designed and located such that there shall be no light trespass onto adjacent properties or streets from pole-mounted lights, wall mounted lights and lighted signs. 4. Applicant shall be required to provide a 30 foot right-of-way or easement for West 50`h Avenue extension on the north property line and/or drainage purposes. This issue shall be resolved prior to or concurrent with the final development plan and final plat. 5. The applicant shall discuss with Public Works and the Fire District the implementation and distribution of traffic calming devices on Parfet Street as part of the final development plan. The motion did not pass due to a 3-3 tie vote. No additional motions on the case were taken. As advised by the City Attorney, staff has concluded that final action needs to occur for this case which is scheduled for City Council public hearing on July 25, 2005. See attached memorandum from Jerry Dahl. Only members present at the May 19 public hearing should participate in the vote (Brinkman, Chilvers, McMillan, Plummer, Scezney and Spaniel). No additional testimony should be taken on the case. Staff would recommend a change to the bylaws (Section 31 - Tie Vote) to clarify that an additional motion should be considered. SUGGESTED MOTIONS Option A: "I move to recommend APPROVAL of Case No. WZ-05-05, a request for approval of a zone change from Agriculture-One and Commercial-One to Planned Commercial Development and for approval of an Outline Development Plan for properties located at 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street with the following findings: 1. (Repeat findings of fact from motion on page 0. With the following conditions: (Repeat conditions from motion on page 1). Option B: "I move to recommend DENIAL of Case No. WZ-05-05, a request for approval of a zone change from Agriculture-One and Commercial-One to Planned Commercial Development and for approval of an Outline Development Plan for properties located at 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street: 1. The proposed commercial zone change is inconsistent with the Agriculture/Estate Residential designation on the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed commercial development could be incompatible with the existing residences to the north. 3. There are regional drainage issues affecting the property which are unresolved." 2 MEMORANDUM TO: Wheat Ridge Planning Commission FROM: Gerald Dahl, City Attorney DATE: June 27, 2005 RE: Case No. WZ-05-05: Medved Autoplex Alan White has asked me to describe to the Commission the current procedural status of this case. As the Commission will recall, the case came before you in a public hearing on May 19, 2005. At the conclusion of the hearing, a motion was made to recommend approval of the project to the City Council. That motion failed on a tie vote of 3 to 3. No further motions on the case were taken. Wheat Ridge Code of Laws section 26-112.E establishes the procedure for the Commission's review of this application. That subparagraph provides, in pertinent part: The planning commission shall hear and consider any evidence or statement presented by the applicant, city staff or by any person in attendance at the hearing. The planning commission shall then make a recommendation to city council to approve or deny the application, basing its recommendation upon the facts presented in the public hearing in consideration of the criteria for review as specified above. A.recommendation for denial shall be considered final, unless the applicant files an appeal to city council with the city clerk within ten (10) working days of the planning commission decision. (Emphasis supplied) In this case, the Commission has yet to make any recommendation to the City Council. The only action taken at the May 19, 2005 meeting was an attempted motion to recommend approval, which failed on a tie vote. The case law is clear that the failure of a motion to approve, on a tie vote or otherwise, is simply that: a failed motion; it is not a recommendation for denial. In order for there to be a recommendation for denial, a motion to that effect must be made and adopted by majority of the quorum present. The Commission's bylaws, at section 31, confirm that a tie vote means the proposal (here, the motion) is lost, but no other action is implied: 31. Tie Vote. In the case of tie votes on any proposal, the proposal shall be considered lost. W RCA 019 Conclusion: The present procedural posture of the application before the Planning Commission is that the Commission has not yet acted to make a recommendation to the City Council for approval or denial of the application. The Commission should act to take another motion or motions until either: (1) a motion for approval or denial passes, or (2) both motions for approval and for denial fail, in which case the Commission will have exercised all of the procedural options available to it, and the application will be forwarded to the City Council with the notation that there is no Commission recommendation, but accompanied, of course, with the minutes of the Planning Commission meetings on the subject. I will be in attendance at the July 7 Commission meeting to answer any questions you might have. W RCA 019 aF WHEAT ITEM NO: ~ o U m REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION OOCORA00 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 27, 2005 TITLE: COUNCIL BILL NO. 11-2005: AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE FROM A-1, AGRICULTURE-ONE AND C-1, COMMERCIAL-ONE TO PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND FOR APPROVAL OF AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4900 AND 4990 PARFET STREET (CASE NO. WZ-05-05) ❑ PUBLIC HEARING ® ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING ❑ BIDS/MOTIONS ❑ ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING ❑ RESOLUTIONS Quasi-Judicial: ® ❑ Yes No hAL r ~61~ Community Development Director EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: City Manager The applicant requests approval of a zone change from A-1, Agriculture-One and C-1, Commercial- One to Planned Commercial Development (PCD) and for approval of a PCD Outline Development Plan for property located at 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street. The Outline Development Plan accompanies the rezoning ordinance and sets allowable uses and development standards. It is general in nature and serves as a basic blueprint for development of the property. A final development plan and plat would have to be approved at a future date prior to any development occurring on the property. Planning Commission made a motion to approve the application at their May 19, 2005 meeting. The motion tied, therefore, the approval motion failed. Final action by Planning Commission is pending. This City Council action is related to Goal 4 of the Strategic Plan to promote I-70 as a major commercial center by providing destination retail businesses and an expanded tax base and increased property values. COMMISSION/BOARD RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission reviewed this request at a public hearing held on May 19, 2005. A motion to approve was made with the following findings: 1. The majority of the property under consideration was zoned from A-1 to C-1 in 1986. 2. The design parameters shown are generally consistent with the C-1 zone district. 3. The proposed document meets all requirements for a Planned Commercial Development Outline Development Plan. 4. There has been a change in character in the area as evidenced by new commercial development occurring to the west of the property in the past seven years, an approved rezoning to PID to the north of the property in 2002, and construction of a major commercial center at 50'h and Kipling. 5. Although not in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan designation, the designation of Agricultural Estate Residential did not acknowledge the presence of commercial zoning on the property. Large lot residential development is inconsistent with the trend of commercial and industrial development in the area. 6. A majority of the property is already zoned commercially. The proposed zone change is compatible with the surrounding area and there will be minimal adverse impacts. 7. There will be economic benefits to the community derived from the zone change. 8. Adequate infrastructure is available to serve the proposed development. 9. The change of zone will not adversely affect the public health, safety or welfare. 10. The change of zone will not create an isolated zone district. With the following conditions: 1. Employee parking for the Medved Autoplex (all three parcels) shall be accommodated on site. There shall be no exceptions. 2. The city shall post signs prohibiting overnight parking on Parfet Street 3. Lighting shall be designed and located such that there shall be no light trespass onto adjacent properties or streets from pole-mounted lights, wall mounted lights and lighted signs. 4. Applicant shall be required to provide a 30 foot right-of-way or easement for West 50a' Avenue extension on the north property line and/or drainage purposes. This issue shall be resolved prior to or concurrent with the final development plan and final plat. 5. The applicant shall discuss with Public Works and the Fire District the implementation and distribution of traffic calming devices on Parfet Street as part of the final development plan. The motion to approve failed due to a tie vote. Final action by Planning Commission is pending. One neighbor was present at this public hearing to speak to this request. The adjacent property owner, Chuck Stiesmeyer residing at 4996 Parfet Street, spoke regarding the parking of vehicles on Parfet Street, excessive traffic speeds on Parfet Street, lack of maintenance on the existing lots, excessive lighting on the existing lots and the extension of W. 50th Avenue. He distributed a packet of information to Planning Commission which has been made part of the case file. Staff recommended to the applicant that mediation with the adjacent property owner be pursued. The applicant chose not to do so. STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES: Staff acknowledges that the development of this parcel may have a negative impact on the residences to the north; however, this is an area that is not conducive to single family residential development. The I-70 corridor continues to be developed with commercial and industrial projects including a zone change to PID to the north in 2002 and a major commercial center currently under construction at 5e Avenue and Kipling. Between 1995 and 2001, the number of vehicle trips per day on I-70 increased by 5,400 to over 105,000 trips per day. This property is located within the Columbine Basin Drainage Outfall plan area. This is a major regional drainage system plan which includes properties to the northwest in Arvada, continues east through the new development at 50th Avenue and Kipling, to past Garrison Street. The plan, adopted by Urban Drainage and Flood Control District in 1994, shows required conveyance facilities on the site running north along Oak Street to W. 50th Avenue and extending over to Parfet Street. To accommodate the new dealership, improvements between Oak and Miller must also be completed. The applicant's engineers are continuing to work on this design. The Outline Development Plan stage of the planned development process does not require an approved drainage plan and report. Staff feels the construction of W. 50th Avenue between Oak Street and Parfet is critical. Not only would it allow a secondary access route through this industrial area but could also be used as a channel for the Columbine Basin drainage way improvements. Staff will be recommending the dedication of right-of-way at the time of final development plan and plat approval. The applicant is working towards resolution of existing code enforcement issues including lighting and lack of maintenance of landscaping. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: Do not approve this request. FINANCIAL IMPACT: A one time review fee was collected for the processing of this application. Additional review fees will be required for the processing of the final development plan and plat and building permit. Sales tax revenues are generated from the sale of vehicles to Wheat Ridge residents only. Sales tax revenues will be generated by the sales of auto parts. Use tax will also be collected on any building materials. RECOMMENDED MOTIONS: "I move to approve on first reading Council Bill No. 11-2005, Case No. WZ-05-05, a request for approval of a zone change from A-1, Agriculture-One and C-1, Commercial-One to Planned Commercial Development and for approval of an Outline Development Plan for property located at 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street, ordered published, public hearing set for July 25, 2005." OR "I move to table indefinitely Council Bill No. 11-2005, Case No. WZ-05-05, a request for approval of a zone change from A-1, Agriculture-One and C-1, Commercial-One to Planned Commercial Development and for approval of an Outline Development Plan for property located at 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street for the following reasons: 1. The proposed commercial zone change is inconsistent with the Agriculture/Estate Residential designation on the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed commercial development could be incompatible with the existing residences to the north. 3. There are regional drainage issues affecting the property which are unresolved." Report Prepared by: Meredith Reckert (303-235-2848) Reviewed by: Alan White Attachments: 1. Planning Commission staff report (without exhibits) 2. Council Bill No. 11-2005 cc: Request for City Council Action-report form 4 r6b CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT OOCORPOO TO: Planning Commission CASE MANAGER: M. Reckert CASE NO. & NAME: WZ-05-05Bear Land Holdings DATE OF MEETING: May 19, 2005 ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a zone change from A-1 and C-1 to PCD and approval of an Outline Development Plan LOCATION OF REQUEST: 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street APPLICANT/OWNER: Michael G. Pharo Associates for Bear Land Holdings APPROXIMATE AREA: 10.59 acres PRESENT ZONING: A-1, Agriculture-One and C-1, Commercial-One COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Agricultural/Estate Residential ENTER INTO RECORD: (X) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) ZONING ORDINANCE (X) DIGITAL PRESENTATION Q SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS Location Map Existing Dealershi Properties v Pio 'Prop sed Loc tion ' A-1 C-2 Planning Commission WZ-05-05Bear Land Holdings ~tl PID 1,js~- Is-=~3 I I ATTACHMENT I All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. 1. REQUEST This application is for approval of a zone change from Agriculture-One and Commercial-One to Planned Commercial Development and for approval of an Outline Development Plan for properties located at 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street. The purpose of the zone change is for the construction of two new auto dealerships and an office/warehouse for parts distribution. See applicant's explanation of the request (1 xhbit 1; apglrcant letTei) IL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The property in question is comprised of two parcels containing a total of 10.59 acres. It is located on the eastern side of Parfet Street and extends over to Oak Street. The southern parcel is zoned C-1, Commercial-One. The northern parcel is zoned A-1, Agriculture-One. The property is relatively flat, has a house and several outbuildings on the very northern part. An open ditch (Wadsworth Ditch) runs along the north side of these buildings. Two additional open channel ditches (Bayou and Swadley) traverse the southern end of the property. Abutting the property to the north is a single family residence zoned A-1 and the detention area for the Hoss Planned Industrial Development. Although this detention area will serve the industrial development to the north, it is also zoned A-1. The L & K Industrial Park Planned Industrial Development abuts the property on the east, as does the 70 West Industrial Park which is also zoned PH). To the south is a triangular strip of land zoned C-2 and A-1 which has two billboards on it. This parcel separates the subject property from the north I-70 Frontage Road. The original dealership of the Medved Autoplex is located to the west, across Parfet Street. A new or used car sales facility is a special use in the Commercial-One zone district. A new or used car sales lot is not a permitted use in the A-1 zone district. Pursuant to the Zoning and Development Code, all commercial zone change applications must be to a planned development district. III. PROPERTY HISTORY The following is a brief history of the Medved Autoplex history which includes property located at 11001 W. 1-70 Frontage Road North (Chevrolet, Hummer, Cadillac), 11201 W. 1-70 Frontage Road North (Chrysler, Plymouth, Jeep and previously-owned vehicles) and vacant property on the east side of Parfet Street which is subject to this zone change request (E^xfi7it2 aeota The property (all three parcels) was rezoned from Agriculture-One to Commercial-One pursuant to Case No. WZ-86-10. The rezoning encompassed all three parcels and included a condition that prior to any development, a site plan approval process be completed in front of Planning Commission and Planning Commission WZ-05-05Bear Land Holdings City Council. A two-lot subdivision was approved which divided the property on the west side of Parfet into two parcels (Case No. MS-86-3). A site plan was approved for the Chevrolet dealership (11001 W. I-70 Frontage Road North) with a special use permit to allow major automotive repair (Case No. SUP-86-10). In 1994, the owner applied for a planned building group plan to establish an interim used car sales operation on the westerly parcel (11201 W. I-70 Frontage Road). The interim site plan allowed for a 25' x 55' modular building to serve as a sales office. The northern half of the site was proposed as a test track for Hummer testing. In 1998, the applicant applied for an amendment to the recorded planned building group for 11201 W. I-70 Frontage Road to allow construction of two buildings containing a total of 98,000 square feet of building area. An additional building with 9000 square feet of area was proposed on the north end of the property. This building was intended to serve as a child care facility for employees. A 10' right- of-way vacation also occurred for West 50a` Avenue which was dedicated back to the property owner. In 1999, the dealership was cited for having illegal vehicle storage on the vacant property on the east side of Parfet. In response to the citation, an application was submitted for approval of a temporary use permit to allow temporary vehicle storage. The request was denied by the Board of Adjustment on December 9, 1999. The applicant filed suit with the Jefferson County District Court against the City of Wheat Ridge and the Board of Adjustment. The court upheld the decision of the Board of Adjustment. IV. OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN The Outline Development Plan (ODP), which accompanies a rezoning ordinance, sets the allowable uses and development standards for the property. Typically the Outline Development Plan is general in nature and serves as the blueprint for development of the property. The Outline Development Plan is also used to establish design parameters including maximum building height, minimum landscaped coverage and minimum perimeter setbacks (BxhN 3, Ou&~n Dea~prent Plan) Allowable uses Permitted uses include auto sales and rental, warehousing and parts distribution and repair and detailing. Staff suggested that the use list be expanded to allow test driving and general office, service and retail uses. The additional uses have been added to the ODP. Access Two access points are shown on both Parfet Street and Oak Street. Both access points align with the existing curb cuts on the dealership to the west. Development Standards The following development standards are depicted on the ODP. The existing development and any future redevelopment of the site must comply with these standards. Planning Commission WZ-05-05Bear Land Holdings Item Requirement Maximum Building and Hard Surfaced Coverage 80% Minimum Setbacks 50' from r-o-w if parking, 30' from r-o-w if landscaped (west and east) 30' from single family homes (north) 15' from external and internal property lines (south) Minimum Landscaped Coverage 20% Minimum Parking Required Refer to Section 26-501 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws for additional requirements Maximum Building Height 50' Signage Refer to Article VII of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws Fencing Refer to Section 26-603 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws Exterior Lighting Refer to Section 26-503 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws Architectural Detail I Refer to the Streetscape and Architectural Design Manual Staff concludes that the proposed development standards are generally consistent with those in the Commercial-One zone district regulations. All requirements for a Planned Commercial Development Outline Development Plan have been met. V. ZONE CHANGE CRITERIA Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a change in zone. 1. That the existing zone classification currently recorded on the official zoning maps of the City of Wheat Ridge is an error. The official zoning map is not in error. The parcel is currently zoned Agriculture-One and Commercial-One. 2. That a change in character in the area has occurred due to installation of public facilities, other zone changes, new growth trends, deterioration, or development transitions, and that the evidence supports the finding of the following. Planning Commission 4 WZ-05-05Bear Land Holdings This could be considered a transitional area in the City of Wheat Ridge. Although there are four existing single-family residences to the north (along Parfet), the general trend in this neighborhood is towards more commercialization of properties. The agricultural identity of the area is diminishing, and development is transitioning towards light industrial and commercial uses. The majority of the property under consideration was rezoned from A-1 to C-1 in 1986. Land to the north of this property was rezoned from A-1 to PID pursuant to Case No. WZ-02- 12 (Hoss). The intent of the zone change was for development of an electrical contractor's yard. There are other industrial uses to the northeast of the site including Inland Container and the Rocky Mountain Bottle plant, which have undergone plan revisions and expansions in the past several years. Although not in Wheat Ridge, a major commercial development is under construction at 50a' Avenue and Kipling. The property is in close proximity to I-70 which carries increasingly more traffic each year. 1995 traffic counts indicate that 99,600 vehicles per day travel on this portion of I-70. A more recent CDOT count performed in 2001 indicated that the vehicle trips per day have increased to more than 105,000. 3. That the change of zone is in conformance, or will bring the property into conformance, with the City of Wheat Ridge comprehensive plan goals, objectives and policies, and other related policies, and other related policies or plans for the area. When the property was rezoned to C-1 in 1986, the Comprehensive Plan designated it as Industrial. The existing Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 2000. The designation on the current future land use map is Agricultural/Estate Residential (AER) (Not to exceed one unit per acre). The AER designation describes the desired character as "Neighborhoods with very low density housing and a predominantly rural character." Desired attributes include well maintained dwellings, lots comprised of primarily open lands, the ability to raise domesticated farm or ranch animals, the ability to construct accessory structures that assist in the production of value-added agricultural products, and densities not to exceed one dwelling unit per acre. The desirability of this area as estate lots within such close proximity to I-70 and adjacent commercial and industrial uses is questionable. The Comprehensive Plan Designation for the subject property is AER, but property directly to the east and further to the north is shown as Planned Business/Industrial Park. The proposed commercial zone change is inconsistent with the designation on the Comprehensive Plan. 4. That the proposed change of zone is compatible with the surrounding area and there will be minimal adverse impacts considering the benefits to be derived. The subject property is surrounded by a variety of land uses including a single family residence zoned A-1 on the northwest side of the property. On the northeast side of the property is land zoned A-1 to be utilized for detention area for a PID to the north. The PID was approved pursuant to Case No. WZ- 02-12 as a zone change from A-1. It is intended to be utilized as an electrical contractor's business. To the east is a mixture of light industrial and commercial uses. To the west are the existing dealerships and farther west commercial and industrial uses. Planning Commission WZ-05-05Bear Land Holdings The zone change will be compatible with adjacent commercial and industrial uses but not the residential properties to the north along Parfet Street. 5. That there will be social, recreational, physical and/or economic benefits to the community derived by the change of zone. There will not be social, recreational or physical benefits to the community as a result of the change in zone. If the property is developed there may be an economic benefit to the city through property tax increases since the property is presently undeveloped land. Sales tax revenues from the sales of vehicles are credited to the municipality where the buyer resides. There would be sales tax generated from parts sales. 6. That adequate infrastructure/facilities are available to serve the type of uses allowed by the change of zone, or that the applicant will upgrade and provide such where they do not exist or are under capacity. All agencies can serve the property with upgrades to infrastructure, the cost of which will be borne by the applicant. 7. That the change of zone will not adversely affect public health, safety or welfare by creating excessive traffic congestion, creating drainage problems, or seriously reducing light and air to the adjacent properties. The proposed development of this parcel could have a negative affect on the residences north of the property. At the neighborhood meeting, the adjacent neighbor spoke regarding the glare and light generated by the existing dealerships. The development of this site will have an added impact on this residence. One of the major impacts of the dealership has been parking. The Zoning and Development Code requires that commercial developments provide all parking for customers, employees and inventory on-site. In each of the previous land use approvals for the dealership, the issue of cars parking on Parfet Street was addressed. The most recent approval (1999) specified that parking could occur on Parfet Street only during construction of the newest dealership. The most recent inspection showed 52 vehicles parked along Parfet. Unless this new facility addresses this parking issue and provides adequate on-site parking, the present practice of parking on Parfet will continue to adversely affect neighboring residents. There are also concerns regarding regional drainage. This property is located within the Columbine Basin Drainage Outfall plan area. According to the plan adopted by Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, there are conveyance facilities shown running north along Oak Street to W. 501h Avenue and extending over to Parfet Street. An additional conveyance facility would run adjacent to the Xcel Energy easement on the south side of the parcel. Although preliminary drainage information was provided, it is unclear at this time whether the proposal can accommodate the Columbine Basin improvements 19 OEM andSrColt m97 Morse I7sAA~1MF'_~~ - Planning Commission 6 WZ-05-05Bear Land Holdings 8. That the change of zone will not create an isolated or spot zone district unrelated to adjacent or nearby areas. Spot zoning is not a concern as there is other commercial zoning in the area. VI. WEST 50TH AVENUE The issue of extension of W. 50'h Avenue has been debated since the original parcel on the west side of Parfet was platted. W. 50th Avenue currently extends from Miller to Oak Street, east of the subject parcel and from Robb Street east where it dead-ends into a cul-de-sac on 11201 W. I-70 Frontage Road North (western Autoplex parcel). 1986: In the mid-1980's, an amendment was made to the Major Streets Plan of the Comprehensive Plan. This amendment designated an arterial street corridor between Mpling Street and Ward Road. Since 50th was a logical extension, 40' of right-of way was dedicated for 50`h Avenue as part of the two-lot subdivision approval on the parcel on the west side of Parfet in 1986. 1994: During the 1994 Planned Building Group approval for an interim used car sales operation on 11201 W. I-70 Frontage Road North, the applicant indicated that he felt it was premature to develop 50"' Avenue at the time, but would be willing to participate when the time was appropriate. A condition of City Council approval was that W. 50' h be constructed on both sections of the Medved property when a building permit for the western parcel is issued. 1998: As part of the PBG review for a permanent dealership on 11201 W. I-70 Frontage Road, street construction plans for 50th Avenue were reviewed and it was indicated that these improvements should be completed on both lots connecting to Parfet prior to issuance of a C.O. The street extension was needed as the plan relied on 50th Avenue for the unloading of vehicles on the north end. The plan was approved by City Council on July 13 but was reconsidered at the next meeting (July 27). The reconsideration allowed construction of a cul-de-sac off 50th on the north side of the property (in lieu of full street extension) with the vacation of the southern 10' of that right-of-way. Further, that the designation for 50th be changed from an arterial to a collector and that 50th Avenue would only be completed if and when the residential properties to the east on Parfet are developed for industrial or commercial uses. 2000: The new Comprehensive Plan is adopted. The connection of 50th Avenue between Parfet and Oak Street is deleted on the Roadway Classification Map. 2003: During the final development plan and plat hearings for Case No. WZ-03-08 (Hoss PID), Public Works requested a 25' wide dedication for 50th Avenue extendin west from Oak Street. The purpose was to reserve one-half of the right-of-way width in the event 50t is extended from Oak Street to Parfet. This condition was not included in the motion for approval and no right-of-way dedication occurred. Planning Commission WZ-05-05Bear Land Holdings Staff feels the construction of W. 50`h Avenue between Oak Street and Parfet is still critical. Not only would it allow a secondary access route through this industrial area but could also be used as a channel for the Columbine Basin drainageway improvements. Staff will be recommending the dedication of right-of-way at the time of final development plan and plat approval. VII. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING A meeting for neighborhood input was held on May 18, 2004 (Ehtbit 6ierghborhood Meeting Reca~icl Exlubtt7, Attendance List): VIII. AGENCY REFERRALS All affected service agencies were contacted regarding the ability to serve the property. The developer will be responsible for any needed upgrades to accommodate the proposed development. Specific referral responses follow. Arvada Fire Protection District: AFPD expressed concern regarding life safety and fire department access due to the congestion on Parfet Street by employee parking. They are strongly recommending that any land use approvals be considered to relieve this parking congestion. Ditch Companies: The three affected ditch companies want to review changes to the current ditch configurations as part of the final development plan and plat process. Valley Water District: Valley Water District has adequate capacity to serve the project. Additional water main lines, fire hydrants or fire sprinkler lines may be needed. Urban Drainage and Flood Control District: UDFCD does not usually object to zone changes, but has concerns with this one. The preliminary drainage information provided deviates from the approved Columbine Basin Outfall Systems Plan. They would prefer to have an open channel system and are not sure this can be accommodated with the intensity of the development being proposed. Public Works Department: The Public Works Department has reviewed preliminary drainage and traffic information. They have requested additional information be provided at the time of final development plan and plat. This would include a Traffic Impact Study analyzing the proposed affect on I-70 Frontage Road North. Public Works recommends future construction of W. 50a' Avenue, and that sufficient right-of-way be dedicated at the time of final development plan and plat. In regards to storm sewer issues, Public Works will require sufficient right-of-way to construct the drainage facilities as described in the Columbine Basin, Outfall Systems Planning. Construction of the facilities will be required at the time of construction of the Autoplex expansion. The proposed development will require extension of the Arvada Channel from Miller Street to Oak Street to service the property. The City may assist Medved in the construction of the Arvada Channel by participating in partial reimbursement if necessary. Extension of the Arvada Channel from Oak Street to Parfet may also be required to service the proposed expansion development and/or the existing Medved Autoplex. IX. FINDINGS OF FACT/RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS Staff has made the following findings of fact. Planning Commission WZ-05-05Bear Land Holdings 1. The majority of the property under consideration was rezoned from A-1 to C-1 in 1986. 2. The design parameters shown are generally consistent with the C-1 zone district regulations. 3. The proposed document meets all requirements for a Planned Commercial Development Outline Development Plan. 4. There has been a change in character in the area as evidenced by new commercial development occurring to the west of the property in the past seven years, an approved rezoning to PID to the north of the property in 2002, and construction of a major commercial center at 50`h and Kipling. 5. Although not in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan designation, the designation of Agricultural Estate Residential did not acknowledge the presence of commercial zoning on the property. Large lot residential development is inconsistent with the trend of commercial and industrial development in the area. 6. A majority of the property is already zoned commercially. The proposed zone change is compatible with the surround area and there will be minimal adverse impacts. 7. There will be economic benefits to the community derived from the zone change. 8. Adequate infrastructure is available to serve the proposed development. 9. The change of zone will not adversely affect the public health, safety or welfare. 10. The change of zone will not create an isolated zone district. Staff would suggest the following conditions be included in a motion for recommendation of approval: 1. All parking for the Medved Autoplex (all three parcels) shall be accommodated on site. There shall be no exceptions. 2. Lighting shall be designed and located such that there shall be no light trespass onto adjacent properties or streets from pole mounted lights, wall mounted lights and lighted signs. 3. Adequate right-of-way dedications for Oak Street, W. 50`h Avenue and Columbine Basin storm water drainage facilities occur at the time of final development plan and plat. X. SUGGESTED MOTIONS: Option A: "I move to recommend APPROVAL of Case No. WZ-05-05, a request for approval of a zone change from Agriculture-One and Commercial-One to Planned Commercial Development and for approval of an Outline Development Plan for properties located at 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street: 1. The majority of the property under consideration was zoned from A-1 to C-1 in 1986. 2. The design parameters shown are generally consistent with the C-1 zone district. 3. The proposed document meets all requirements for a Planned Commercial Development Outline Development Plan. 4. There has been a change in character in the area as evidenced by new commercial development occurring to the west of the property in the past seven years, an approved rezoning to PID to the north of the property in 2002, and construction of a major commercial center at 50`h and Kipling. 5. Although not in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan designation, the designation of Agricultural Estate Residential did not acknowledge the presence of commercial zoning on the property. Large lot residential development is inconsistent with the trend of commercial and industrial development in the area. Planning Commission WZ-05-05Bear Land Holdings 6. A majority of the property is already zoned commercially. The proposed zone change is compatible with the surround area and there will be minimal adverse impacts. 7. There will be economic benefits to the community derived from the zone change. 8. Adequate infrastructure is available to serve the proposed development. 9. The change of zone will not adversely affect the public health, safety or welfare. 10. The change of zone will not create an isolated zone district. With the following conditions 1. All parking for the Medved Autoplex (all three parcels) shall be accommodated on site. There shall be no exceptions. 2. Lighting shall be designed and located such that there shall be no light trespass onto adjacent properties or streets from pole mounted lights, wall mounted lights and lighted signs. 3. Adequate right-of-way dedications for Oak Street, W. 50a' Avenue and Columbine Basin storm water drainage facilities shall occur at the time of final development plan and plat." Option B: "I move to recommend DENIAL of Case No. WZ-05-05, a request for approval of a zone change from Agriculture-One and Commercial-One to Planned Commercial Development and for approval of an Outline Development Plan for properties located at 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street: 1. The proposed commercial zone change is inconsistent with the Agriculture/Estate Residential designation on the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed commercial development could be incompatible with the existing residences to the north. 3. There are regional drainage issues affecting the property which are unresolved." Planning Commission 10 WZ-05-05Bear Land Holdings INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER Council Bill No. 11-2005 Ordinance No. Series of 2005 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE FROM A-1, AGRICULTURE-ONE AND C-1, COMMERCIAL-ONE TO PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPEMENT AND FOR APPROVAL OF AN OUTLINE DEVELOPEMENT PLAN FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4900 AND 4990 PARFET STREET (CASE NO. WZ-05-05) BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO THAT: Section 1. Upon application by Michael G. Pharo Associates for Bear Land Holdings, approval of a zone change from A-1, Agriculture-One and C-1, Commercial-One to Planned Commercial Development and for approval of an Outline Development Plan for property located at 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street and pursuant to the findings made based on testimony and evidence presented at a public hearing before the Wheat Ridge City Council, a zone change and Outline Development Plan are approved for the following described land: PARCEL A: A TRACT OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16; THENCE NORTH 00'01'12" EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, 448.01 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF THE DENVER AND NORTHWESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT-OF- WAY AS RECORDED IN BOOK 126 AT PAGE 583 IN THE CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 74°07'34" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT- OF-WAY, 549.56 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF PARFET STREET AS RECORDED IN BOOK 155 AT PAGE 424 IN THE CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE OF JEFFERSON COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 00°04'24" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY, 96.86 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID DENVER AND NORTHWESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF PARFET STREET NORTH 00°06'56" WEST, 633.78 FEET TO A POINT BEING 247.50 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE ATTACHMENT 2 SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16; THENCE NORTH 89°43'46" EAST, PARALLEL WITH AND 247.50 FEET DISTANT WHEN MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID NORTH LINE, 530.21 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16; THENCE SOUTH 00°01' 12" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 582.83 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. PARCEL B: THAT PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, 528 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EAST LINE OF PARFET STREET; THENCE SOUTH, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF PARFET STREET, 247.50 FEET; THENCE EAST, PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, 528 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 247.50 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1329 AT PAGE 127 OF THE JEFFERSON COUNTY RECORDS, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. Section 2. Vested Property Rights. Approval of this zone change and Outline Development Plan does not create a vested property right. Vested property rights may only arise and accrue pursuant to the provisions of Section 26-121 of the Code of Laws of the City of Wheat Ridge. Section 3. Safety Clause. The City of Wheat Ridge hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is promulgated under the general police power of the City of Wheat Ridge, that it is promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare of the public and that this ordinance is necessary for the preservation of health and safety and for the protection of public convenience and welfare. The City Council further determines that the ordinance bears a rational relation to the proper legislative object sought to be attained. Section 4. Severability. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, or part of this Zoning Code or the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall for any reason be adjusted by a court of competent jurisdiction invalid, such judgment shall not affect application to other persons or circumstances. Section 5. Supersession Clause. If any provision, requirements or standard established by this Ordinance is found to conflict with similar provisions, requirements or standards found elsewhere in the Code of Laws of the City of Wheat Ridge, which are in existence as of the date of adoption of this Ordinance, the provisions, requirements and standards here shall supersede and prevail. Section 6 . This Ordinance shall take effect 15 days after final publication. INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first reading by a vote of to on this 27 h day of June, 2005, ordered published in full in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Wheat Ridge and Public Hearing and consideration on final passage set for July 25, 2005, at 7:00 o'clock p.m., in the Council Chambers, 7500 West 29`h Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final reading by a vote of to , this day of 2005. SIGNED by the Mayor on this day of 12005. GRETCHEN CERVENY, MAYOR ATTEST: Pamela Y. Anderson, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM BY CITY ATTORNEY GERAL DAHL, CITY ATTORNEY IA publication: 2"d publication: Wheat Ridge Transcript Effective Date: AIL low PARAGON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. June 2, 2005 Larry Routten District Manager Colorado State Land Board Front Range District Office 1313 Sherman Street, Room 4621 Denver, CO 80203 M RE: Arvada Drainage Channel Reach From Miller Street to Oak Street Wheat Ridge, Colorado Dear Mr. Routten, This letter is to confirm our phone conversation yesterday regarding the above referenced drainage channel. Per your suggestion I downloaded the GENERAL FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS from your web site and have distributed it to key project members. The property we are interested in is described on the attached legal description and is of record in book 738 page 373 of The Jefferson County Recorders Office. The Assessors Map is also enclosed depicting the exact location of the property. Firstly, we would like to confirm the property is in The State Land Board (SLB) Trust. Urban Drainage Flood Control District (UDFCD) has co-sponsored "Outfall Systems Planning Columbine Basin" (OSP) that includes the "Arvada Channel" as the retrofitted outfall for this watershed. Marked excepts for your review are enclosed, as well as an overall composite of the basin. Also enclosed are design development drawings that indicate our proposed implementation of the plan. The City of Wheat Ridge has required that downstream drainage improvements be implemented prior to our site-specific improvements being approved. They also indicated their first choice would be ownership in FEE SIMPLE of the tract, with the second choice being a drainage easement. It is our belief that the SLB has owned the property in since 1951 revealing it not a desirable property in view of it has never been sold. The overhead transmission power line also encumbers the property. Furthermore, the property is encumbered due to the fact it is the anticipated path of drainage way from upstream properties as identified in the OSP. It would make since for Wheat Ridge to own this property for drainage purposes. This drainage way outfall for the watershed exists regardless of whether a 7852 South Elati Street, Suite 203 l Littleton, CO 80120 l (303) 794-8604 l FAX (303) 795-3072 formal drainage easement is in place or not. Granted, the urbanization of upstream properties will result in more runoff, more often; hence the need for the OSP by the sponsors. Implementation of the study is in the general public's best interest. In summary we would like the SLB to transfer this property to Wheat Ridge, FEE SIMPLE. This is critical for our project to proceed. Accordingly, we would like to meet with the SLB, as well as Wheat Ridge and UDFCD officials at your earliest convenience. Should you have any questions please call. Sincerely, i Thomas A. Gardner, P.E. Project Manager Enclosed as Stated CC: Tim Paranto, P E Wheat Rid a Public Works Director m autd ossanPTSGrlheatrlge Bill DeGroot, P.E. UDFCD Dianna Blanch, Medved - Colorado Mike Pharo, Pharo Associates Marshal Fishman, Lotmer Rubin Fishman Brown & Saul, P.C. Henry Swinhart, Xcel Energy Bill Braash, Xcel Energy F:UOBS\04-006\docs\letterSLB6.2.05.doc tZ YZ General Frequently Asked Questions What are state trust lands? Colorado's 3 million surface acres of state trust lands were given to the state by the federal government in 1876 for specific purposes, such as the support of "common schools" -and to this day the lands are leased for ranching, farming, mineral and oil and gas production and other uses. Proceeds are used to support eight trusts, the largest of which benefits kindergarten-12th grade education in the state. All trust lands are managed by the Colorado State Board of Land Commissioners, a division of the Department of Natural Resources. The agency is overseen by a five-person board and has a staff of 34 people and a budget of around $3.8 million a year. In November 1996, the voters passed a Constitutional amendment that changed the structure and mission of the State Land Board (SLB). The amendment did a number of things: o Reaffirm that the School Trust (93 percent of the state trust lands) is an intergenerational trust to be managed for the long-term benefit of public schools; o Set the revenue benchmark as "reasonable and consistent income over time." (Prior to the amendment, the Constitution had been interpreted as directing the SLB to maximize revenue); o Mandated that the Board place a high priority on good stewardship of state trust lands, so that they can benefit future generations of Colorado schoolchildren; o Created a 300,000-acre Stewardship Trust of lands that are to receive special stewardship attention, and are protected from sale or development unless four of the five Land Board members vote to take them out of the trust. Where are state trust lands located? If you look at a map that shows state trust ownership (most often shown in dark blue), you will notice that in many parts of the eastern plains there is what looks like a blue checkerboard pattern. In other places, especially the far western portion of the state, the blue blotches are bigger, and there are large areas where there are no blue squares at all. That is because the federal government granted Colorado sections 16 and 36 in each township, except in areas where there were already claims to those lands. (Example: Costilla County, which was subject to a Spanish land grant; counties like Montrose and Delta, which were then part of the Ute Indian Reservation; and counties like Summit, where there was already a lot of mining activity.) The feds then gave the state larger blocks of land in areas where there weren't prior claims. How are state trust lands managed? Because the agency has a very small staff, state trust lands are managed through leases to individuals, companies and government agencies who pay for the privilege of using state trust lands in specific ways. Common used that lands are leased for include grazing, farming, mining and oil and gas production. The Board also issues rights of way, easements and road access permits. In the early 1990s, the SLB also began leasing land for recreation. So far, the biggest customer is the Colorado Division of Wildlife, which leases more than 400,000 acres of trust land throughout the state for hunting, fishing and other wildlife recreation. These recreational leases are "stacked on top of other existing leases for grazing and other activities, and all the lessees work together to create an access plan that makes sure that they can peacefully co-exist and that the natural values of the state land are conserved. (Contact the DOW for recreational information on these lands.) In recent years, the agency has also begun to diversify its portfolio of assets to include commercial properties in Denver and other urban areas. Who receives the revenue that Colorado trust lands generate? The SLB serves as trustee for eight separate trusts with specific beneficiaries as follows: 1. School Trust: This trust accounts for 91 percent of the acres managed by the Board; the other seven trusts together account for the other 9 percent. Revenue and income from the Permanent Fund, managed by the State Treasurer, go to support K-12 public schools. 2. Public Building Trust: Revenue from the land in the trust used for the purposes of erecting and maintaining public buildings. 3. Penitentiary Trust: Managed for the benefit of the state prison system. 4. University of Colorado Trust: Managed for the benefit of the University of Colorado system. 5. Saline Trust: Named because its original acreage consisted of "salt springs not exceeding 12 in number with six sections of land adjoining and contiguous to each." Benefits State Parks. 6. Internal Improvements Trust: Managed for the benefit of State Parks. 7. Colorado State University Trust: Managed for the benefit of Colorado State University. 8. Hesperus Trust: Managed for the benefit of Fort Lewis College. How much money does the SLB make for Public schools? In fiscal year 2003-2004, the agency earned about 36.4 million in revenue, from everything from grazing fees to oil and gas and coal royalty payments to rents from office buildings. A second source of annual dollars for schools is interest income from the School Permanent Fund, which contains nearly 364.3 million earned over the years by the SLB-mainly from land sales and mineral royalties. When this interest is added in, total benefits to schools amounted to 57.9 million. Can I hike mountain-bike or bird-watch in state trust lands? Because the SLB's first responsibility is to its beneficiaries, state trust lands are not "public" in the same way that lands owned by the U.S. Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management are. Unless a local of state agency or a private individual has come forward and offered to pay for the right to have recreational use of a particular piece of state trust land-and taken responsibility for managing that recreation-the land is just as off limits to the public as a piece of private land. Some large blocks of state trust land are open for recreation. For example: The SLB's 72,000-acre Colorado State Forest, west of Fort Collin in Jackson County, is managed for recreation by Colorado State Parks. I hear there is low-cost novernment land available for Purchase in Colorado. Is this true? The federal Homestead Act has long been repealed. You can contact the U.S. Bureau of Land Management: http://www.bhn.gov/ and the U.S. Forest Service: http://www.fs.fed.us/index.htrnl directly about their policies. For a list of Colorado state trust lands that are currently being offered for exchange or sale: http://www.trustlands.state.co.us/ . Because of our fiduciary responsibilities, when we do decide to dispose of land, it is sold only at fair market value. (As you may know, real estate values in Colorado have soared in recent years. O S 1~ f ~t~ om. -Y al 11..lttta it.ra~2p„~ny :nnc::~ - no TIES; DX06 s.e.rw 13th &we september .te t~+e..1r..dr..Oamatw.w fifty-one ,►wwltw TRS D ISM TRAXWAY CORPORATION e.'"dwaft travel/W r wWte arbaw01 wed aw at P1 eba .fLW~, .r tM ma r.r1..w STATE Or COLORADO ti~C eery a Y....md Pat. Intsaerltf. Two as mid lmwT at W. sea 04 ra aw m wmlbnamd a, .um of One Dollars RWAOMM and other goof and valuaole consideration m tM..1s Arty w tW as Pat )P s•ad p.W 6f W dd Pat y m W. wmw MA W m W wbuaar a ww CLAWD. aed b y,yymp(ta,p,xs.amradr.d.sW QMTnMr4..P y QUIT glnf c t Per sq da►Pemar.l fray wlL.m.w awl WYml. OW M a.w Wrty MmaesleNadth. Ito met i.lh lemae, .0 tW ,trht. Wi0.laam4.Min and d.mw rsia6 tW sN pelf d IW tat M b admN•RnmAardmeawd property .Me.a,bae..d Warla tSe ~ot itererton ww oamwn m-rtt' Wer, tnroW_:r.:.aa upon a strip or parcel of land one nundred (1uO) feet wide, being fifty (501 feet an wldtn on cam aide of 6ne center llne of %r..e final looetion oftne Golden ten Sian of too Tenver 4ad .iorthYeateM Railway, over the onL quarter of (31u~ ouw, (31t aagee%%x930 Of ty-nine aectlon Sjxzm 3irtaen (io), "ownsnip Thre (oy) tllesL of '.tee btn P• a•i salt center line acing nnie.narti- eularly aercrloed as failows, to Witt CUmmaaOmg at its inter- section wltn the east line of said eoutnaest quarter of tae Southeast cuarter (5YQ of 56}) of Section 3xxte*n (lb), ^%stant your hundred anA ten vau) feetr Wore nY less, Soum of the nortneant comer of vai? :ortY 14U) acre .rgoL( tne2CE SouLn seventy-Sour ceLrees twenty-two ..mutes 1<est (s. !4 221 W.) fpr a ..latahee of tnir:een nuZiren and ei"-my-seven U1 Af) feet, horn or leas to an inLersectisn wit.: tae nor. noutn oemer .ins of said section, :iVe nan)reu and ;ortY feet, ,sore .ar -.s, n,,rin of :ne Poo, to quarter,ege f.`j 1:. Con linen[ .nree ani ntnstem one-fPlndredtnB more or lean. 'IO Nv6 AWD r0 saw tae come. mnaxr wim.a and dwol.r W .pP^•w^•mm art ml.lleres Merwom se.arbr. m a.arrf.. ammmm avpnuUi^f, and ~I w~m4.iM tlW. fnw.t W calm wS.aw•.•. "f ur ~ pµf.t W s,M pa6.t11a a br m wWy, m tW edY P..1m va Wmat and ye6wf et w. uid part y W tM.m. W4 Its ONeiW-lxm rcr..r. ,a rPr,,B' paeRECr, Yo. mW Pa d tae dent Pat W W enmd k. rnrpenm a.me [P a Wrmma •ap,a,tyw ty la Pm%dent. males mrp.aw lW mWbomanm lQ)Ped, anesmtl yta t. vest]. tie ar ad rmr sees ales.. written A _ t`Z:NVdR Tt1A.Y+IAY.,,OURPUrG'fiuBl -isle . . ate,.. srAw or cowa&Oo. ' n.roln.erratwoamt w..elm.wtwrw eetm. m. ttt. Der / 051.W V. A. Alexander / Pib1l'~e"t end 0e011 H. Draper u src,umrs d Tke r'enver Tramway Corporation, s't 5 aowp•nsoit Wswarwm..wml~w~• ~lyL-'-.•.-~--' ~ 373 I!3~1 Na IWO. aw aL.aoa~ •waxaxia~iWn,l+n m.Mp.Maw4lxY ar,atx.lwtx.Mw.aa MAP 39-164 N W +/E S rEET o +op R00 300 W 8nhbny plm+eda r.+w;wm2am 22 21 20 29 xx 32 31 30 ay 1G.~i~y +15 42 41 40 49 +s 52 2 51 50 ss 62 61 60 )61 7 1 70 +xs 82 81 80 492 91 m 01 ws 6 5 4 3 2 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 18 17 "S 15 14 13 17, 20 21 22 23 24 30 29 28 27 26 25 31 32 33 34 35 36 5ECTION INDIX 2 Nw NE 3 s w QUAVERSECTION COUN INDIN bDi,,RTm IpCOd = DISCLAIMER Caution: This map is for assessment purposes only. It is not necessarily accurate by surveying standards. DO NOT USE FOR LEGAL CONVEYANCE. Subsequent editions with updated information will be published on a continual basis. Therefore, the information contained on this map may be modified or altered. w Section Lines Tie Bar Lines Subdivision Lines Quarter Section/Fie Bar Lines Township Boundaries County Boundaries All Others Right of Way, Water & Rail Road (Areas without parcel numbers) M Metes & Bounds Related (Block numbers 99 & 00) This map was last updated: Wednesday March 30, 2005 at 1:18 PM Jim Everson Assessor GENERAL NOTES OUTFALL SYSTEMS PLANNING THIS IX ITFALL VI PLANNING 770CUM 6 CONCEPTUAL WT ONLY. THE ~ ECT BOUNDARY SYSTEM COLUMBINE BASIN $H PROVIDES O A MUM DRANT NCE ARVIN THE OUT ALL YSTE - LGM INTERCEPTORS WILL BE REQUIRED TO SERVE TRBUTP& AREAS-UPSTREAM OF - - - AND ADJACENT TO THE PROPOSED OUT NEIL ALL FEATURES SHOWN LIST OF DR A WIS cO"ELS. 1111 ES, STORM SEYIERS. DETENTION PONDS. ETC.) ARE PROPOSED DaI>55 NOTm AS EXSTING - - 2_) IMPROVED GRASS CUED CHANNEL TYPICAL SECTIONS ARE SHOW ON DRAWING NO. 6. A 24-WCH RCP LOA'-ROW CONVEYANCE SYSTEM IS TNE`PREEFRtED LOW FLOW CGNJEYAHCE' SYSTEM OF THE SPONSORS. ALTHOUGH SOME LOCATIONS REQUIRE A SI6FACE'CONVEYANCE SYSTEM. AT THESE LOCATIONS A CONCRETE TRME-CHANNEL IS RECOMMENDER SEE DRAWING NO. 6 FOR DETAILS - 3.) CANNEL FLOM. WIDTHS SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE ESRWED. THE WERIA FOR ESTABLISHING GRASS UNED CWBEL.RRW. SAL BE SIBCRTNAL FLOW OESICN. ALLOWANCE FOR ADEQUATE MAINTENANCE ACCESS. AND GENERAL COMPLIANCE WITH THE LOCAL JURISDICTION'S-DRAVUL.'E CmmA. _ 4.) REGIONAL DETENTION. POND - S(WIN AE APPROX[MAJE AND SHOULD BE VERIFIED DURING FINAL DESIGN THE DETENTION VOLUMES SHOWN ON THE. PUP6 ARE THE . FTDDD ROUTING REQUIREMENTS ALL DETENTION FACILITIES SHOULD CAREFULLY AWE EMERGENCY OVERFLOWS. INCLUDING EMERGENCY OVERFLOW REQUIREMENTS EROSON PROTECTION. AND SURFACE RELIEF ROUTES, AT THE TIME OF IMPLEMENTATION- ' THE R.O.W. SHOWN FOR CHANNELS AND REGIONAL DETENTION PONDS DESIGNATES THE 5.) APPROXIMATE LAND REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THESE MASTER PLANED FACILITIES. THE TERM 'RO.W" DOES HOT' NECESSARLY IMPLY OWNERSHIP ELY THE - - - - LOCAL JURISDICTION. B.) WRAPEROSION PROTECTION SHOULD BE PLACEDAT ALL CULVERTS. BRIDGES. STORM SEWER OUTLETS. AND OTHER LOCATIONS WHERE. CONDITIONS DICTATE THIS NEED. - - THE PROFLE$ SHOW PROTECTION AT ALL OIOTEES DISCHARGING TO EARTHEN - SLOPES. AND CHANNELS 6'ROUIED RIPRAP SHOWN AT CULVERT. AND STORM SEWER INLET - . -LOCATIONS WHERE NEED. IS ANTICIPATED. 7.) - HEADWALLS AND WNGNALLS SHOULD BE INCLUDED FOR ALL . STREAM CROSSINGS N - ACCORDANCE WITH COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS STANDARDS. 7L) SEVERAL IRRIGATION CROSSINGS EXIST IN THIS OLRFAL PLAN WHERE DRAINAGE AND IRRIGATION FLOW SEPARATION IS NECESSARY. THE RECOMMNDED METHOD IS TO REDIRECT 6UICATgN DITCHES TO CROSS OPEN CHANNELS AT CULVERT CROSSINGS AT SOME LOCATIONS ULMTED R.O.P . WIDTH REQUIRES EXTENSION OF CLOSED CONDUIT FACILITIES. SEE RMS FOR LD'DONS. FTIRNIER INNESfIGATON AND - CONFORMANCE RI DITCH COMPANI(SIIDUIREMENNS 6 1EQURED. 9.)- "FLOW RATES ARE SHOWN ON THE PANS AND PROFILES AND ARE"BASED -ON HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS FOR THIS MASTER PLAIT DESIGN PE.AN 3w DIAGRAMS PROVIDE . APPROXIMATE DESIGN ROW RATES -10.) UDRMTIES SHOWN ARE BASED ON INFORMATION SUPPLIED. BY LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND URIMTY COMPANIES. PUN VIEWLOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE THE ELEVATIONS- . OF ALL URRIOES SHOWN ARE BASED ON TYPICAL COVER DEPTHS.. OR AS INDICATED BY VERTICAL DATA PROVIDED. VFRIFIGTION OF UTILITY LOCATION AND DEPTH IS NECESSARY PRIOR TO FINAL DESIGN OF THESE MASER KW4ED FACILITIES. -11.) ALL ELEVATIONS SHORN IN FINN AND PROFILE ARE BASED ON A DATUM ESTABLISHED FOR TAILS PROJECT MAPPING. - ' 12.) INLET LOCATIONS AE SHOWN AT SCHEMATIC LOCATIONS ONLY. FURTHER - INVESTIGATION 15 REQUIRED. - 13.) ON-SHE DETENTION IS RECOMMENDED FOR DEVELOPMENTS TRIBUTARY TO THE ARVADA CHM44EL_ LOGY- JURISDICTIONS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION. OF ON-SCE DETENTION FOR NEW DEVELOPMUTS NG p AVfi H v Pea.. 64q Araeeo „A~ 64q Awr LMT SA OF STUDY I DIE u+ RFA wt . 58q Awnw ~Lywfw. - o A d I c~Ner t l Mq Awes - va. . a n q A.mev - Sa - It 5 ..may. ! Lace A.sx,e Y y ;;M A..' ~ . i - ..e C~z i - - ~ ® T. (Y - . $ fMN Avetwwt (1H. 40 ~ rMr. a - 6TH A mae \ venue rte. no.. mmF. 1 - TITLE SHEET 2 - PLAN SHEET INDEX. BASIN AND EXISTING DRAINLGEWAYS DELINEATION 3 - SUB-WATERBED NAP - EXISTING CONDITION - 31 - - SUS-WATERSHED HAP - PROPOSED COMMON - 4-5 - RECOMMENDED OUTFALL SYSTEM SCHEMATIC 'PUN 6 TYPICAL CHANNEL SECTIONS AND M19CEUNNEOUS DETAILS - --7-16 - 1-10 PUN SHEETS - 17-22 11-16- PROFILE SHEETS - ABBREVIATIONS HERCP - HORRONTAL ELLIPTICAL REINFORCED CONCRETEPIPE RCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PPE CDC- - REINFORCED,CONCRETE BOX. CULVERT - - ' r - CENTERLINE - R.O.W. RIGHT OF WAY 0' . 5 YEAR FLOW ' V's 5 YEAR VOLUME OF STORAGE Q, ROW CAPACITY - - 0 DESIGN FLOW - VICINITY MAP ST A.. STATION SCJLE Ie=SO,DOO' AVG. AVERAGE .:LEGEND PLAN PROFILE BASIN BOUNDARY LINE EXISTNG..GROUND AT - - p - CHwNNEL STATION LINE . _ p - LATERAL PIPE - + NTH m.ET MATCH LINE. - - PROPOSED CULVERT CROSSING . WITH EROSION MAT RO.W. ACOVISIfION BOUNDARY LINE ~ PROPOSED DROP MANHOLE CORPORATE BOUNDARY LINE STRUCTURE PROPOSED STORM SEWER R----Sw---j EXISTING UTILITY LINE TYPE OF UTILITY: W - WATER )L~ PROPOSED CHANNEL INERT - p MOTH OF G - GAS II HT ~ - PROPOSED STORM SEWER AND LE 100-YEAR WATER SURFACE p MOTH ION E ELECTRIC II_lill MANHOLE. AND INLET PROFILE AND NVFNCH RCP , + DROP STRUCTURE SS- SANTARY SEWER - - LOW-FLOW CONVEYANCE SYSTEM n IRRIGATION DITCH - - - CENTERLINE -OF PIPE PROPOSED CROSS CULVERT-..-PROPOSED POND D OUTLET- -r[L_~~- EXISTING CULVERT (D 6O' OR BO% CONTROL STRUCTURE PROPOSED OPEN CHANNEL DPROPOSED CROSS CULVERT ) BERM > - < EXISTING CROSS CULVERT MULLER ENGINEERING CO., INC. LTA CONSULTING ENGINEERS J~ -2=- RRONGATE 4, SUITE 100 LY - - 777 S. WADSWORTH BLVD. LAKEWOOD, REGIONAL DETENTION POND EXISTING STORM SEWER COLORADO (303)D 988-4939 a 3 8 60' LIMIT OF E10STING ROW 80' ROW REQUIRED - - c I F EXCAVATION VARIES- g RAT BOTTOM. RCP FLOW CONVEYANCE RIDGE ROAD TRIBUTARY TYPICAL GRASS-LINED CHANNEL CROSS SECTION STA. 30+80 TO 43+00 ORIGINAL SCALE: Y-20' HOR1Z. 1'=10' VEITL MINIMUM +1 [--Z MINIMUM ROW ACQUISITION TABLE . MREOTI MAmRAN - AOff55pEFfX OF MXONIM Rq1 STREAM REA41 RMD E%CN/ATON - 1M1X REOURE11 OARVADA CHANNEL ALLISON TO CARR - Y- 9' 74' 75' CARR TO CODY N 11' 74' 75' CODY TO DOVER - N 12' 80' 80' DOVER TO PON01 N 9' 62' 655' POND1 TP:GATPoSON Y 9' 74' O'1b GARRISON TO INDEPENDENCE Y - 9' 74' 75' 12 al 1' MRiMUY * SEE PROFILE FOR TYPE OF LOW ROW . I I 4' -CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ARVADA CHANNEL AND RIDGE ROAD TRIBUTARY TYPICAL GRASS-LINED CHANNEL CROSS SECTION STA. 0+90 TO 29+00 ORIGINAL SCALE. 1'-20' HOW. V-10' - VERT. OAK STA. 0+90 TO STA. 6+80, STA. 6+80 TO STA. 12+50 STA. 13+30 TO STA. 29+00 TYPICAL CHANNEL SECTIONS r~b3 , S tf A % 4o A L MINIMUM A ;11 AS REQUIRED TYPICAL PLAN LAYOUT ORIGINAL SCALE 1'=20'- 0 V O Y Ill m°6-86' 90' ` (55' MmINIMUM~ F~~ L VARIES 1 MINIMUM) 3 SIDED CONCRETE CHANNEL N 7' 50' 60' SECTION A-A r- 10, W. w ARVADA CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT AT TRANSMISSION TOWER DETAILS ORIGINAL SCALE: 1'=20' HORIZ. 1'=10' VERT. NOTE DESIGN OF ARVADA CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS AT THE PSCO TRANSMISSION TOWERS IS SCHEMATIC ONLY. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN. REFINEMENTS TO LAYOUT OF STRUCTURE, WINGIVALLS AND RELATED GRADING, AND ADDITIONAL HYDRAULIC DESIGN IS - REQUIRED DURING FINAL DESIGN. MutR ExGUlsexu~G co., INC. A Ih~BAN DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT COLUtM3~E BASBJc'vCHAMEt" coNSaarwG 1n1GDNT crass Wt'L 4. Alln I00 SEC T MN AM rn s trws,<oTna BLVD. JHCITY OF ARVADA CITY OF W!'i£AT I:iDGE uca v. LofoRADD a aFa CUTFALL SYSTEMS PLANNM HSCEM-ANEOUS DETALS PROJECT No, 9072 pDD) Y06-4V39 LAIDFCD PFIO.ECT NO. 90.00.00 LOCATIONS FROM S1A 41+ TO 61+90 mw su. n.Io To.9o RRYF R 1RglR4Rr FIlIM STA 13+30 TO 21+60 4' i I DTTOM CONCRETE TRICKLE CHANNEL DETAIL ORIGINAL SCALE 1'=2' CONVEYANCE - RIDGE HOME TRIBUTARY TYPICAL GRASS-LINED CHANNEL CROSS SECTION ORIGINAL SCALE. 1'=20' HORIZ. - DRAWING 6 I I I. I I 'J a I AYE SHEET KEY /4J/4LER STiCEET 36.21' 24.00'- 50.90 ANGLE PONT ANGE PONT Wi .00 TOW - 47.00 47 ,WING WALL /2-~ AHEAD WALL A-~ 1,-W1NG WALL v 60YJ_~_42_____ INV = 36. FlNISED GRADE AT WALL (TYP.) NOTES 1. REFER Ta COOT SM. PIAH NO M-601-10 M SHEET 8 FOt HEADWALL A: WINGWALL STRUCTURAL DETAILS UUIOL If X 4 RCB 2 WING WALLS A HEAD WALLS TO HAYS FORM UNER. REFQH TO LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR TOMLINSON PARK DESGNM BY OHM UESON. WING WALL #1, #2 & HEAD WALL #1 SCALE: 1'=1O 33.86' 24.00' PNQ£ PONT 34.12' TO~ PONT TOW - 47.00 ANGLE NG WALL 14~ ~HEAD WAL. 12--~ /_W1NG WALL BOW AMSTED GNADEJ AT WALL (TYP.) NOTES: 1. REFER TO MOT STD. PLAN NO M-601-10 ON SHEET 8 FOR HEADWALL K WNGWALL STRUCNRAL DETAILS WING TO LANDSCAPA E PLANS FOR T011NiSON PART IXMGNED BY S DOUBLE If X 4' RCB OHM DESGH. WING WALL #3, #4 & HEAD WALL #2 SCALE 1'-1D' AM 16X.53' 12' - E PONT - 49.00 HEAD WALL = 49.00 NO WALL #6 I BOW - 48.50 WIAT W AT WALL (TTP.) OT STD. PLAN NO M-601-10 ON SHEET 8 T tWNGWA~ WNGWALL SIRUCNRAL DETAILS 12' % 6' RCB LAAPIANS FM TUMUN50N ARK D@GNED BY DHM o151GN. WING WALL #5, #6 & HEAD WALL #3 scALE: Y=lo 4016 MQAH, ST. 4061 MQUB1 ST. lIO ,YXNR.B pQl N/RYNI(D A IN N =4M E. Y0NA" 5DM ]FIECVY IXOS41G5 _ Sfh S,il6.G6 W11TMtt fA059N0 yfA }{1092 .I : I 4AS IXOS9iE iQ STk 31+St3 aB66 MR1816T/ II • E GAS UN3 STA: 34+55.4 INV: 5366.90 E%ISTNG B' WATER STA: 34+43.02 TOP EL 5 5.48 5365 EXISTING 8' WATIU STA 34F36.ti TOP EL 5365/.: GAS UNEJ STA 34+3252 INV. 5364.83 5350 5345 5340 5335 5330 35+00 34+50 `cm ueYS (lm.) 4000 MQ113, lm. m °4"""" 4005 MUFA Sf. _7 to 1 `16$TCR11~ STA~OIt W N 3399.611 E 1501].51 i W • P 14' 05591F SAS C c ]MJ].63 BTA ! o W W - 5p 0 SD 100 co sWe 1•=50• tttt 50 31+00 IIBN EY"£91E ST-OB U J J W to LLr + co N aQ 9 C9 0 rj) cm OF ARVAOA APPROVAL BIXICA BY. /B OS'- 3187 TR DALE Joe NUMBER RENEW IS GENERAL COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY Q ARVADA ENQNEERING CODE OF STANDARDS AND 6PELTFlCA CN LATEST A=RA SOLE RE9'ONDMOE( COMPLETENESS ESS AND/M THI ACCIACY OF TN13£ COCIIMENIS SHALL RELHAN WTH TIE R,-ANS ED PROFES NOT ENdNEER SEALING TM~ PLANS THE QTY DOES OES N ACCEPT LIASUtt FOR'FACUt1E5 DE9dVE0 BY OTHERS. 2 CITY OF NLtBAT RO)GGR APPROva BIaCB T8P MG OF 0BM APPROM M. PUBUC NORKS ORECTOR DATE FOR GENERAL COMPUANCE AV THE Om a RENEW IS WHEAT RIDGE ENQNEOBNG CODE OF STANDARDS AND R R SPECIFlCATOJS, IATEST EO11MR. S pESPONSSUm FOR COMPLEENESS ANO/OR ACCURACY OF TESE ODQIMENTS S REMAIN WITH THE REGISTERED PROFESSOHAL ENGINEER SEALING THESE PLANS THE CITY DOES NOi ACCEPT UABIUTY FOR FAOUTIES OESGNED BY OTHERS ~u uu ,rs ' ~ 5 ~ ~ t ♦ ~ ~a `f ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~.w~ 3 X ~ x X ~ 1 ~f Fp.vw._ nnnw~nn . .1ww. .n rrrr ~~5» , ~ S !14n".'.. Y :'i.=tYr'j .w.~ X . t " ~ n ~ f tP" ~ R ~ .r, ~ s~ F y~ aN.~ 1 u Yl i ~I :F r t, T of *+f~ 1 ~VV/ tom, 1 ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 s~ara yP 1 s f t~ 4~ r 4 k n: ~n Y ,:,w,,:~', ~ ~",oar f~ , k fi ~ T s" r~eaV.ow;Mxa ~a~uU~Y' ,2~, r. ~ a wn i;. ~ ~ n ,f 4U X ~/AFfM~ r, ~ f ~ 1 t' t fi - ' { 1rr`4, d r~,~ t' rr < 1 r Fr'1 y m..',,.. i ~ .v Y~ ~r ~ ~ ` n d, ~ r ~ ~ 3• J ~ ~ , ~ i ph i~ ~F~~ , C S ~ 1~Ki'6' ~ $ Y ~i G~tiu .3~d..'n j~ ~ r ~ ! ~ =X `~:r~ y~ C k i.,'n ~ 1 ~ b' ti . ~ k E d X t X ~ f ~ r , y ;a t ~ t f f ~ ~ C s :i r'• a ~ z 3 c ~ i z r F ~ ~ t ~ 5 a $ iX ~ p Fv } ~ G R A ^ ~1 t h .~1 - vt ~ t 5 , ya ~r i 1 E, ~r ,r A 1 ~ ~ i s ~ ~ + i E F 2 ~ y y.t''' 33k 'F i~ C t f ~,,r', r ,a ~ J P [ ~ f'~ f '4. .f •n~f~i. 2 "^,4~' ~"I 7 4 ¢ ~k ! Y j~ f 4 ~t A~(r f V ~~rs F{ x P ~ .H ,5 ® L~ d1I ~Qo Nf " r~ ti ~r ; ~ l~~ ~ lll +f~ YJ ~'"_~s V < ~t ,.N ~ ~ ~F ~ i5~ t~ ~ it ~ 1 inch = 5® f~. i ~r , t f` F d t ~ ,t+ Y ,~Sf3`~ kS ( i A! ~ ~ ~ n ,r' ~ X ar~ i5 F k!r S, 1. ~f' a (N :s { ~ ~ d' i. ,f"~ ,~i~ ~h .G~r ~ f u ~ a ~jis r' 4 S ~ ~r ~N ~ ` ~ ~ X X t a' 4 r ; n R 1~' Jq SeC L: { ~ nr 3 1 5 ; ~T r k e Y 6 a is f ~ ~h 1 ~ ± 5 z i F I/~( { r r ~ ~u....,.. i 6 9• 1. ~ ~ S x p ~ p d k Y r $ ®...e P ~i ;•;t x 7 o L,' ~ ~ z ,f~ X Fr•` f ~ i~ ~s 'k~ 7~ 7~ r "rte E SSp { Yi ~ ;Q~ ~r ~"4.ir :,n r':.. Hi~ ~ } ~ 1 S § ba r S ~ l S t t~ {f7 Y f ! y ~ YY5 J J ! t!i4 y } j l4. • F tl" ,r 4,, 4 p+~ i 1 „i ~ j@ Ia t 's • ~ a ~ . + ~ ~ ~ „ l 3 ra a{ q~ 'ta, '"•i 7 F s 9` ~ "c~ t(~)~ f b . Q~ V 1. x ~:y 'ti 4 t 4 y. 1: S ~ f' % ~4 ~ } ~ y: g • S # ~ q ~ ~ Y 5 { 3 # ' ~ A ~~r f 3 ~ t ~ y ~ ,,t z , 1J ?a r "1 . # ( ~J a S ~ ~ y .F I Y S i 5 "''t ~ f 1 G r; • ~ f = € ~ 0 P M1,. X4,3 e 3 s: ! e ti` o ` • '4 c e ~ I ~ 'k s ~ ~ ~ r $ s ` . !~=e_~ - a- - y f ~ a ~ ti 3, ~ y k & 1 ~ , K. 8 1 1 L~~ t s V x 1 , ,8 9 1 - g X ~ ~ ~ , ;5 , ~i l S W~nrn~~+ au .r ' 4 P ~ ; t 4 ~ Y'? r i~ r s~ t ~f ey a,.- ~ ~ ~ f s t k , j ! F 4 ~ ; • t a s u f rAi k* i i ~ E ~ f 5 Q• r ~ X J ~ ~ k 2 a 6 r~ ~ . r ~ ""„eau, ti ~ ~ ~ f . i z t.~~ o. , ~ o .M X ' ~ i •F~,. •i~, t err . 7 r.. 3 ~ ~ f✓~'~. 1 gym; 1~' 2 . _ ~ a ~ ' s` V f 1 v a ' ,r • ~ ~ r ~ R I T i j 3' ~ ~ ~ . X 1 ..Po:IMtgiE ` ~ s~ (~y 3 k•. ;S tit/ i „rf FF~ a7 ~~r' ~ f tl A O ~ a o. a ~ o. 4 d t e ~ ` { ~ ~f wa ~n (p~~OJI 54s ; y ~ ~ Y { PS R {.~r • i 1 . x ~ C~ f ~ ~ X ~ n, z, ct7 t f _ ,t ~ , s C'~ ~5y , ' ~ wwwwYY~~ ~ 1 ' A ~,y+ • L .M. ~ L ~ ~ c ~ vrr` A J n" ~ rv `.t ~:N ~ ~ ~ V. i ~ ~ ~ t 3 ~ x ~ , ~ asp'` ~ ~„vim r .N ~ .s j . rv ~ Q ~ < f y s~ ~H' ~n ~ ~'4~ I dGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. /1 ~ ;"tcm~xrys i ELATI ST.. SUITE 703 -71 9 a r ~4 LITTLETON, CO 8( CO 80120 303-794-8604 rn ~K ~ aF 3 v ~ i; ,i i. MEDVE EDVED AUTOPLEX fi t; PRELW IMINIARY n c DD m ~0 O DESIGN: TAG DATE: O DRAWN: JP PROJECT i PAN ~wm., t, ; u°~' ,;iAS ~ N 7 ,~'<< G~' . r ~ ~ ~ ~ n ; a a .u ~ f - , nt ~ 3 1 t ~ ;A p~ „ ~s , ;Y 1' .~a ~ g ~ i' ~f ,g a~ II S X r 7 r 1 X a ~ F x F { i gay f K F;' p i kk~~ ~ ~ ~ k ~ ~ t 1 f { ' 7 ~ x. r L„ ^rs r 9 is 9 8. ~1 1 9• ~ ~ ; t-~ 7 x 1 ;k J y S ~ ' ' < 7 s w ~ ~ q 1 t t j L_ i IYY 1~._ a y' S, ~ ~ s ¢ ~ ~ f P - gyp Y Y I* ~ ' 7 r ~r I r Q f` d i X ~~r n ''i ~ f 1 e 8 rr E P rf a i ~ ~ 1,~~ A~ _ ~ ~ y ~1 ® r g 3 ~ ! f! a c C i ~ *r C ( 3 L f ~ , ~ . ~,o,.r t r? „ s. 3, i~ i r ~ `x r a' ~ ~ s i r f } 4 ` j'/~ ~ ~ ~ i'° ~ i i t_ P? X 7 ® 4/ ~a /'1 ~ Jf - ~ , r ~ .r.,~~~° ' l f, ~ ~ ;i g ~'i ~ a 1 ~ 1 } ~ Y ~ E c fz r- ,_f ~ 9 %s ,E i S 1, 3 { 4 & xg * g Y e f 7 P 5F y ; A .2 9 7 x x ~ .w~~~1~ I r~ M{- ~ ,rj ~ s ,ti I~L.I f ~ s, ® t, ~ti y f''y is I ~a . t J" 5 4 2 ` ~ 4' R...,,~ a~' i 1 ~ i r i F ~ I ~0 ~ r t ~ ~ k ~ ~ r i~~. ¢y E Y t ~ 4 ,4 3 fi i Jr i ~ ~ s K ~ V ~ 6 " ~ ~ J d j # ,r,> ~ ~ ~ b r f ~ r n 'e_ z" Q - ~ ,r` p r i ~ ~ wwlnllllll air r~ ~A it J f i ~ ~ ~ F s'. rturmx i f `Z/ 55~♦ y6 {f xS 'j J y 'wi C 6 ~ 'a, t ,,r n j - ~"J , y f ¢ s t 9 s ~~s. F' f ° ~ ~ :f ~ ' a r. r , $ rt ~s ~ ww ~ M111w wllll~ ~r~ ~Mn~ r~~ ~ f. ~ 3 1 ~A ~ ~ n~ 1 % t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~e, tg L .s ~ z ~ d f~ t tl ~ ~ ~ f ~k ~ ~ r ~f X € ~ , a' ~ _ `r = . ~ i, ~ ~ ml%~' r .P C 9 ggf t afifi4 +~~.~r W. L ~ t1~ .,a~~ ~ ,f ; P fi• n d~~ ~~.~q~! -0~` ; t t ~ 3, s~ ~~h i ~ ~ ~ $ C~ 3.~ ~ J A.ws.. v. s~" ~dr. y,N~pr. - ` ^ t 2 cc 0 ,V X 3 ~ ~ Y 1, t 7 z ~ { rt N ^ C A - w_ J i~ TC 1\ 1 I ~'1 h i ~Y Ar l i ~ ?x !Pat ~4~ „Ml~ ~l~f ~,r ~ ~t~~' KK~.~prt 5 C c t ~ ~,n,o .a~r:,~ { i "'o- •m~"~~ wv au~n'r ~~w:m~ W, r x ' ~ ~ s~ ' 3 # V , _ ~p f . r.. may ~ ~pyr r P" °d M".~N i^~ P;{Yu1yp '~r^ ~.r.. ~ r t ..~N r tnw° [f y J r`r/" a^r'e✓" V ~.rj( 1. a~ i ~ x 3 ~ , ri s ,j} k ~ e N~.I J" ~nw. '7 ~~+lee ~ ,fit .~,Urm~' ~.en ap em„' i9A'"~~` _ „vp. wR"' x~y ~ ~ '~,~x .'trwt rr ~ 4 ,y° ; ~ ~ a 3 3 K f ~i ~sf' ~eN ,fin R°"' M, a ; ®`rw ..w.,~wy' y+~w}wc~ ~.t?.ca7' ~ ro B } i P X s ~vf~t n ~ w,~ a~ fin. .,,.r x~ rtm~ .,x~~r l w~i° " .m+"~, ~„w .nM^^ yn na.+'r .~M' aY r f ~ ~ _ X ~ '"SU,. 1 ~ a ~ )C } Y^` t ~ m+"`,'.trl""`x~ ~kA:nkcRr. ,W'~R ,y~<`~ > .4 ff i ~ i i. h e ~ - r k p i f<~ h~ rw f F: 1. g ,n" ! ~ .r g # a ny yn 4 Y k A: ~ ,d,.~° ~ rf i ® v { h 7r a/° F 1 a ~ 1 ~ p f r{yam q'`r; 'Uf ~rwn'>~«' . 9 ~ S 1 7r .may ;Mpg .C,' . rt ~ 1 } ^ ® / 1 / f Y i ~ t ~ i ~ ~ '""nr,a~n'~r ✓ n ~ r 9 a r~ s.r~~ x «m ~ , I - i { ~~E ~ ads } ~~a ~ nW,r„~. . w.~N -s~ttm, a~rx ;,a~envna g 'ka~z , rf .j~' g Ra M .r Af t~ . Utz x ~~w,tn.. ~;:m F d. 4. ~ ya4~'i:.r,+a.a+ .n aniP,!lk! iF1?, W S. . ~ . ' , C ~ ...r~!"' ~ Y 9 r,. . na p ~ ~ ° y b ~ t i J~ e ~ ,r ,p~ 3 ~ ~ ` b'Y~ .vii. F n J Y X6 n.v+i"'M .ter ..rx d^ .x 1 ~ ~ ~ S A ~ n l /f~ , 6 r c 7 t. i w . rl. i .I'. " A q T ~ 3 . k I c h ''{r 1 ~ V i ~ i ~ s f ~ ~ • k ~ ~ F z ¢ ~ ~ ~ k .,,.w, a $ 3 i a' ~ ~ r F T ~ 3 ~ " i ; 1 ~ Z J ~ i r , ~ a x 8• ,~s ~x 7 '~F :{r~~ ~ x rm.~y~'4` ~y' f d ~ 1„ ~ . ` f~'''(~. axe. '~.~nd°' i 1 M a ry t t ! ~ : n a r rr~ m A ,9`f e ..d' ~ III ..d a• f .a.,. „~a~ ~ iE i) 1 9 ,a 1Al ti~~ ~ipF~ .e+"" .r aN y d{1' ~m yqN. < ~ c v. f~~• ,.ate _ 1 .x 'k ~ ~a i { M X 9, .f 'i1 i k~ t o 7 s4 ,s i ate m E f i~ ~3 i ~e i ~ ~ { _ ~ ; /A ~ i ~~~~qj/ i !r9 i ~ i sl® 5 - Z i JS f ty, Y~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ J~ - - _ i 1ellY L i C Critical Slope 0_012457 ft/ft LITTLETON, CO 8C 1 L.1®/~l I t~ ...a 1. i s .J U I 1 E.,.. L. dJ ~.d I a Velocity 7.74 ft/s rn 3 Velocity Head 0.93 ft v cfl Specific Enerc 5.93 ft MEDVE ft. 0 Froude Numb 4.71 S 1 /4 SEC. 16 Flow Type 5ubcritical PRELIM m T3S., R69W., 6TH P.M. DE DESIGN: TAG DATE: OE r u-~-~-. 0 DRAWN: JP PROJECT Page 1 of 1 Meredith Reckert From: Roland Inskeep Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 6:57 AM To: Meredith Reckert Subject: RE: 4996 Parfet Thanks.. We will look into it. From: Meredith Reckert Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 3:41 PM To: Roland Inskeep Subject: 4996 Parfet Hi, Rollie- About two weeks ago, I submitted a complaint to dispatch regarding property located at 4996 Parfet Street. The complaint was for derelict vehicles and not parking on a paved surface. Actually this property is zoned A-1 and has a single family residence on it so it is exempt from paving (Section 26-501.D.1.). The complainant gave me a photograph which may be helpful regarding dv's. Thanks- Meredith 6/2/2005 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Telephone 303/235-2846 FAX 303/235-2857 May 27, 2005 Mike Pharo Michael G. Pharo & Associates 2835 West Oxford, #6 Englewood, CO 80110 Dear Mr. Pharo: The City of Wheat Ridge At its meeting of May 19, 2005, Planning Commission made a motion for approval of Case No. WZ-05-05, a request for approval of a zone change from Commercial-One and Agricultural-One to Planned Commercial Development and approval of an outline development plan for properties located at 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street; however, the motion to approve failed. Therefore, the request is DENIED. Your request is scheduled for first reading by City Council at 7:00 p.m. on June 27, 2005, and second reading with public hearing on July 25, 2005. Please feel free to contact me at 303-235-2846 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Kathy Field Administrative Assistant Enclosure: Draft of Minutes cc: John Medved Medved Autoplex 11001 W. 1-70 F.R.N. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 c:\..AMy DocumentsWath)APCRP7S\PLANGCOM\CORRESP\2005\WZ0505 PUBLIC HEARING r A. Case No. WZ-05-05: An application filed by Michael G. Pharo Associates for I. approval of a rezoning from Commercial-One and Agricultural-One to Planned Commercial Development and approval of an outline development plan for properties located at 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street. This case was presented by Meredith Reckert. She entered all pertinent documents into the record and advised the Commission there was jurisdiction to hear the case. She reviewed the staff report and digital presentation. The staff report contained several findings of fact regarding this case. No recommendation was given. Commissioner CHILVERS disclosed that he was acquainted with individuals (Michael Pharo and a couple of residents on Parfet Street) involved with this case. He did not have a business or social relationship with any of these individuals. It was determined that there was no conflict of interest and Commissioner CHILVERS could hear the case. Commissioner CHILVERS questioned whether the city could prohibit Medved employees and customers from parking on the street. Ms. Reckert explained that the zoning and development code requires business owners to provide parking for customers and employees on-site; however, people cannot be prevented from parking on public streets. Chair MCMILLIN suggested limiting parking on Parfet to 2-3 hours. Ms. Reckert will talk to the city traffic engineer about this. Commissioner CHILVERS expressed concern about the effect of lighting on neighboring properties. Ms. Reckert stated that a photometric plan would be required at the time of final development plan. Commissioner BRINKMAN asked about sharing costs of drainage improvements. Ms. Reckert explained that the Columbine Basin Outfall System is a regional drainage system and therefore it would not be fair for Medved to be responsible for all drainage construction from Oak Street to the east. This drainage area is not included in the city's five year capital improvement plan. In response to a question from Commissioner SCEZNEY regarding to improvements to Parfet Street, Ms. Reckert explained that, at the time of construction, the applicant would be required to install half-width public improvements including curb, gutter and street paving. Mike Pharo 2835 West Oxford, Englewood, CO Mr. Pharo was swom in by Chair McMILLIN. His firm prepared the outline development plan for the applicant. He presented the survey of the property and pointed out that the 100-foot strip of land to the south where the power lines are located is owned by John Medved. Public Service Company has an easement across this land, but does not own it. He stated that the proposed addition would match existing architecture rather than the "quonset hut" configuration suggested by the Hummer Corporation. Full build-out of the property would reduce a temporary retention pond to a permanent detention pond on the east side. Planning Commission Page 2 May 19, 2005 The proposed regional drainage plan impacts the northern and eastern boundaries of the property, flowing from the northwest and outflowing to the east and is too large for any single land owner to handle. Wheat Ridge, Arvada and Jefferson County also have to be involved. He requested that the applicant be allowed to go forward with development of the property with a temporary retention pond to be in place until such time as a permanent solution can be put in place on a phased basis. He stated that he agreed with the city's findings as contained ° h 73 staff report. Mr. Pharo stated that, with the exception of an emergency, all communication with employees on the lot would be conducted by cell phone. He further stated that employee parking spaces would be designated on the lot; however, it would be impossible to totally prevent employees from parking on Parfet. A parking study will be submitted with the final development plan. Lighting plans will meet or exceed city standards. He stated that the applicant has difficulty with agreeing to dedication of a public right-of-way on the 50m Avenue alignment because it is not shown on the city's Conrehensive Plan and the city would probably have to condemn land in order to complete 50T. He further stated that the applicant is anticipating the potential to blend right-of-way dedications for both vehicular access and drainage into a common public corridor. He is hopeful that arrangements can be made to out-flow drainage via a manmade swale under Oak Street. In conclusion, Mr. Pharo stated that the applicant will find a way to resolve the drainage situation and resolve the historic problem of parking on Parfet as much as possible. John Medved Mr. Medved was sworn in by Chair McMILLIN. He stated that his dealership is in its 180i year of operation in this location and has been a positive influence on the community not only in appearance but in drawing people to Wheat Ridge. The proposed development would provide continuity in the development of this portion of the I-70 corridor. In response to questions from Commissioner CHILVERS, Mr. Pharo stated that employees from the existing Hummer dealership will be moved to the new area and parking will be provided so it would not be necessary for any employees to park on Oak or Parfet. Design details are still being considered as to the conveyance methods for drainage (either enclosed or open swale.) In response to a question from Commissioner BRINKMAN, Mr. Pharo stated that none of the subject area is designated as a wetlands. Alan White stated that once the neighborhood revitalization study is complete, 500i Avenue improvements will probably be revisited. Mike Pharo returned to the podium. He suggested language in the outline development plan that the applicant acknowledges the city needs right-of-way for the 500i Avenue corridor as well as the fact that there is a drainage corridor that must go through the property as well. He asked that the drainage corridor be sized in accordance with the existing 25 feet of right-of-way as a function of the plan and that overlaps be allowed if possible. Planning Commission Page 3 May 19, 2005 Chuck Stiesmeyer 4990 Parfet Mr. Stiesmeyer was sworn in by Chair McMILLIN. He distributed a packet of information to staff and Commissioners which contained a copy of his verbal presentation, photos of conditions in the area, information on Hummer vehicles, and his recommendations. The packer was entered into the record and made a part of the case file. He expressed concern about safety issues in relation to speed on Parfet Street by Medved employees who use the street as a test track. Other drivers speed on this street as well. Abandoned cars are also regularly parked along Parfet. He expressed concern about the appearance of the barbed wire topped chain link fence and unmaintained trees that face his house. While front lights are directed to shine downward, lights in the back spill into the street. He also expressed concern that there is not and will not be adequate parking for employees and customers. He also commented that if the demand for Hummers continues to decrease, there could be a vacant building. Mr. Stiesmeyer suggested that back lot lighting be improved; speed bumps be installed on Parfet to prevent speeding; the issue of abandoned cars be addressed; Medved management instruct employees that Parfet is a residential street and should not be used as a test track; Medved construct an 8-foot brick fence for buffering from his house; a change in zoning should not be allowed until drainage issues are taken seriously; the proposed design should be compatible with the existing dealership; another dealership should not be allowed in this area along I-70; and the existing ditch and willow tree should remain untouched. Finally, a proposed 60-foot right-of-way dedication on 50`s would cause the street to come within 3 feet of his bedroom window. He suggested any road improvements center on Kipling to accommodate the new development going on there. He also suggested that a traffic light be installed at Parfet and I-70 Frontage Road. Alan White commented that some of Mr. Stiesmeyer's sugs rsail$ot tied to the proposed development, but could hopefully be addressed through other channels. Commissioner PLUMMER suggested prohibiting overnight parking on Parfet Street to address some of Mr. Stiesmeyer's concerns. Michael Pharo returned to podium to address comments made by Mr. Stiesmeyer. He suggested that some of his concerns could be addressed by communicating with the dealership. The trees he referred to are not located on Medved property. The Wheat Ridge police should be addressing concerns such as speeding and abandoned cars. He stated there is no corporate policy to use Parfet as a test track. The applicant will not agree to build an 8-foot brick wall. He commented that if is unfortunate that Mr. Stiesmeyer lives in a transitional area and Medved will do everything possible to be a good neighbor. (The meeting was recessed from 9:00 p.m. to 9:10 p.m.) Mr. Pharo requested that any parking time limits on Parfet be postponed until such time as the applicant has had opportunity to build adequate parking space. Chair McMILLIN commented that a condition of the last expansion in 1999 specified that parking on Parfet could occur only during construction of the expansion and that condition was Planning Commission Page 4 May 19, 2005 never met it was moved by Commissioner PLUMMER and seconded by Commissioner CHILVERS to recommend approval of Case No. WZ-05-05, a request for approval of a zone change from Agriculture-One and Commercial-One to Planned Commercial Development and for approval of an Outline Development Plan for properties located at 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street. 1. The majority of the property under consideration was zoned from A-1 to C-1 in 1986. 2. The design parameters shown are generally consistent with the C-1 zone district. 3. The proposed document meets all requirements for a Planned Commercial Development Outline Development Plan. 4. There has been a change in character in the area as evidenced by new commercial development occurring to the west of the property in the past seven years, an approved rezoning to PID to the north of the property in 2002 and construction of a major commercial center at 50th and Kipling. 5. Although not in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan designation, the designation of Agricultural Estate Residential did not acknowledge the presence of commercial zoning on the property. Large lot residential development is inconsistent with the trend of commercial and industrial development in the area. 6. A majority of the property is already zoned commercially. The proposed zone change is compatible with the surrounding area and there will be minimal adverse impacts. 7. There will be economic benefits to the community derived from the zone change. 8. Adequate infrastructure is available to serve the proposed development. 9. The change of zone will not adversely affect the public health, safety or welfare. 10. The change of zone will not create an isolated zone district. With the following conditions: i 1. Employee parking for the Medved Autoplex (all three parcels) shall be accommodated on site. There shall be no exceptions. 2. The city shall post signs prohibiting overnight parking on Parfet Street. 3. Lighting shall be designed and located such that there shall be no light trespass onto adjacent properties or streets from pole-mounted lights, wall mounted lights and lighted signs. 4. Aglicant shall be required to provide 30 feet of right-of-way or easement for west 50 Avenue extension on the north property line and/or drainage purposes. This issue shall be resolved prior to or concurrent with the final development plan and final plat. Commissioner BRINKMAN offered the following friendly amendment: The applicant shall discuss with Public Works and the Fire District the implementation and distribution of traffic calming devices on Parfet Street as part of the final development plan. The amendment was accepted by Commissioners PLUMMER and CHILVERS. Planning Commission Page 5 May 19, 2005 Chair PLUMMER requested that staff advise the police department that there was much discussion and concern expressed by the Commission regarding traffic issues on Parfet Street. Commissioner BRINKMAN stated that while she was in favor of rezoning the property to PCD, she was opposed to the Outline Development Plan as it stands now. She expressed concern about the open issues regarding drainage and the placing of so many conditions on an Outline Development Plan that should have been addressed ahead of time. She would have liked to have had a better resolution to 50s Avenue before it was presented. She further expressed concern about the "rushed" manner in which the application has been presented. She did not feel assured that concerns would really be addressed by the applicant. The motion failed 3-3 with Commissioners BRINKMAN, McMILLIN and SPANIEL IL voting no and Commissioners STEWART and WESLEY absent. 8. OLD BUSINESS I F x Alan White presented a brief update on the Cabela's project. 9. NEW BUSINESS Alan White advised the Commission that decisions regarding lighting and sign regulations will wait until completion of the neighborhood revitalization plan. The final findings of the study should be complete in July. 10. COMMISSION REPORTS There were no commission reports. 11. COMMITTEE AND DEPARTMENT REPORTS There were no reports. 12. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Commissioner PLUMMER and seconded by Commissioner CHILVERS to adjourn the meeting at 9:40 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. McMillin, Chair Ann Lazzeri, Recording Secretary Planning Commission Page 6 May 19, 2005 Subrmit/ed by CGIUck 57'/C.s1,heyer af- {7'IPe74 ISSUE #1: SAFETY J page one Existing and future traffic conditions on Parfet Street. (Please refer to Picture #1.) CONCERN A: Parfet street narrows from its current 40 foot width (to be 60 feet after development) at the south end, where it meets the north 1-70 frontage road, to 26 feet wide, (beginning at my property), where it continues north, up a significant hill, until reaching Ridge Road. A total distance of about 1 /2 mile. When I bought my house 8 years ago, Parfet Street had no posted speed signs. At present, two signs indicate 25 mph, which are generally ignored. Several years ago, The city of Wheat ridge measured the "median" vehicle speed at 39 mph, meaning half the cars traveled faster that 39 mph, half slower. Through my personal observation, of nearly 8 years, the greatest percentage of the very fastest speeders are Medved technicians, from 7 a.m. to 9 a.m., pulling out of the dealership, using Parfet as a diagnostic "test track." (Personal aside ,referring to the Corvette at 10 a.m. this morning.) Of course, other non-Medved related drivers speed also, and the traffic heading south is particularly treacherous, since vehicles naturally pick up speed heading downhill. ATTACHMENT 2 Pulling out of my driveway in the morning, with all of the street parking, is very dangerous. (Refer to pictures #2 and 3.) My neighbor to the north, Frank Wehling, has an even worse situation, as he is not able to see the cars speeding south on Parfet, until he his car is already in the street. CONCERN B: Making the situation worse is the fact that cars which are unwanted trade-ins, have bad titles, or belong to Medved employees who don't have any other place to park them, have littered Parfet street, adjacent to the dealership, for years. Refer to picture 4. This eyesore sat on the street for 4 months. Refer to picture 5. Soon joined by this car. Refer to picture 6. Which was vandalized three weeks later, and began the vandalization Of cars on my property. Refer to picture 7. Abandoned on the wrong side of the street for two months. Refer to picture & Abandoned by a Medved salesman, this old red Rabbit did not move one inch for nearly a year, then finally disappeared three days before the plates expired. ISSUE #2: APPEARANCE My concerns in this area lie in two areas: FENCING and GROUNDS MAINTENANCE, and LIGHTING CONCERN Q Fencing and grounds maintenance. Looking out my front porch, 1 daily face an 8 foot tall chain Link fence, topped by barbed wire, which surrounds the rear of the Medved Dealership (Refer to picture # 9). This fence has not been effective in preventing break-ins at the rear lot, but is very effective in catching wind- blown trash. The "motion-sensing" feature of the fence has been broken for years, and several of the trees which were planted on the right of way also suffer from poor maintenance (Refer to picture #10). The tree in icp tuts #11, which would have been a nice light block, is shown in mid-summer flower, 4 years after planting. CONCERN D: LIGHTING The existing lighting at Medved is generally good, but many lights are not pointed at the ground, and instead illuminate the street, passing cars, and my house. Pictures #12 and #13 illustrate the parking lot lights as seen from my front porch. These naturally stay lit all night. ISSUE #3: DRAINAGE. When the current Medved dealership was expanded, years ago, approved building plans called for a retention pond at the northeast corner of the property, to catch runoff from the rear parking lot. Pictures #14 and 15 show the "retention pond" which was constructed. My personal observations have shown how little water this holds before the street is flooded with runoff from the rear parking lot, after a heavy summer rain. ISSUE #4: THE NECESSITY OF TWO DEALERSHIPS . Currently, the Medved dealership sells Chevrolet, Chrysler, Hummer, Dodge, Cadillac, as well as used cars. Moving Hummer across the street to a dedicated facility will certainly improve crowding at the existing dealership, but will eliminate the current parking on the east side of the street. At any one time, 50 to 60 cars of employees (with a few customers) park on the street. For Medved to conform to the currently ignored parking regulations, with the increased parking needs of two additional dealerships, means that space needs to be provided for about 100 cars. This is a rather sizeable lot. With the addition of an expanded parts warehouse, used car dealership, and possibly a previously proposed child care facility, I don't see how all this can be constructed on the east side of the street. Finally, I have seen the proposed design of the Hummer building. I have two concerns, which are: 1). The design is incompatible with any other building in the area, much less with the very attractive existing Medved dealership. 2) Sales of Hummers have fallen every month for the past two years. I have enclosed an article from AUTOMOTIVE magazine, dated August 2004, which explains the rather fragile nature of a commitment to building a dealership for a vehicle which weighs nearly 9000 pounds, gets 8 mpg. In the city on a good day, in the era of $2.50 plus and rising gasoline. Indeed, we need look no further than the existing Ford dealership at 38th and Wadsworth, who received planning approval from the city of Wheat ridge to move and expand their dealership to the south, then subsequently proceeded to lose the John Elway franchise tag. That "approved" dirt lot remains vacant, surrounded by a shoddy chain link fence, years later. p 167"VR e, I . WA 1:,51 NEXT TO iMel)VeD~ l~OOeJNfr NOP + veD P I C, TV2e y, P/C7u2e .S, P~I~ re c,+ t/ ,p,Zjur-2 8, P,cture m. f1wor-e lid C( i VC4? + L I ~c' I S pf~-+Vr2 1s 4 Weapons of Mass Consumption OC*, -summer faces Aq i long, hot summer. ~ yo/7 ACROSS AMERICA, HUMMER DEALERS ARE PREPARING To BrrE THE bullet and honor their end of a bargain they cut with General Mo- tors Corporation a few years back. Flush with optimism, the dealers signed franchise agreements obligating themselves to spend millions to build new, freestanding, Hummer-exclusive showrooms, imposing steel-and-glass Quonset buts with a giant, 35-foot-tall, steel H in front cif each. It must have made sense at the time. As I write in May, however, many dealers are having trouble getting their Hs up. Several have yet to break ground on their new stores. And more than a few are contemplating notbuilding them at all, despite the potential liability and possible loss oftheir fianchises. For GM and the dealers, it is the Hummer of their discontent When the H2, the Chevy Silverado-based SUV with the 8600-pound gross vehicle weight, launched an expanded Hummer fran- chise in late 2002, it pimp-rolled out ofthe box. ,verybody wanted to be the first on his block 0 own the latest, hugest, meanest, most swag- ering 4x4 in the Americas. 112s went out the loor for premiums far in excess of their ;50,000 list price, celebrities drove them, and hey stopped traffic. Contemplating its good brame in an otherwise grim sales environ- nent, GM could hardly be blamed for assum- ng a nnninator's touch of the old Hummer ;wagger itself. But then something went wrong. Late last ,ear, sales started sinking, down each of the )ast eight consecutive months, off 25 percent or the first four months of 2004. The division ias resorted to subvented leases and big Tat incentives, the volume-puffing, profit- cilling stuff that Hummer used to boast it Mould never need. Dealers havebeen encouragedto look ahead n the Hummer H3, a smaller, cheaper SW used on the Chevrolet Colorado mid-size pickup. But it's not certain that even a Success- ful H3 will allow Hummer to meet its 100,000- unit sales target, even with that number's recent downward revision. It is at moments like these that one must asle the question: What were they thinking? Whose idea was it to acquire a brand that had been associated with only one product-a wildly expensive, hugely unwieldy military vehicle of no practical use to 99.99 percent of motorists yet possessing the rare ability to offend many of them-and build on it? It's what you might call a high concept The next time you see something this high, call the paramedics. Former GM executive Bon Zarrella used to remark that the depth and loyalty of Hummer's customer base meant GM's involvement with the brand made perfect sense. It was an amus- ing construction, given that Hummer's birth parent, AM General, sold.fewer than 8000 civilian examples of the HI in the ten years before GM got involved. If Zarrella thought those sorts of ownership figures actually count- ed for something, his trapdoor exit from GM came none too soon, before he could add Avand and Zimmer to the company's brand portfolio. If sales were the real determinant, GM never would have walked away from Oldsmobile, which had an installed customer base in the millions. The Hummer predicament raises rather the vision thing, what GM saw when it looked out on the world not so very long ago. There was no doubt that some audience existed for Hummers, ever since the Hl's particularly potent fifteen minutes of fame in Gulf War I. Surely, there would be an even bigger demand for more civilized relations. But did these a long-lived market or a wise idea make? Even before gasoline prices started to spike, J. D. Power surveys found early H2 purchasers expressing bitter dismay over 9 mpg tankfrils. Thebuyers were, evidently, too stupid to antic- ipate that it would take a lot of fuel to power their outsize, heavyweight trucks, but the point is that even Hummer true believers are disap- pointed by lousy mileage. The H2 is a poster child for libertine con- sumption, so it was inevitable that the vehicle's image would suffer whenever gasoline prices rose. But some other things happened. For some large swath of the population, the Hummer became a defining symbol of all that was gross, wasteful, and excessive in American culture, like the'59 Cadillac tailfin in an earli- er time. Hummers are now prime lightning rods in our polarized society. Half the country hates them. Idiotic so-called environmentalists set them alight on dealers' lots. (Hello, a-hole? Burning a Hummer, good for the environ- ment?) It's ironic. Driving an H2 around New York City, I marveled athow much better it was than the Hl, the worst road machine ever devised. But I also realized that my H2 was generating more jeering and obscene hand gestures than I'd ever witnessed outside Fenway Park. Like Hummers or not, who needs the hassle? Here's another guess at why Hummer sales are falling faster than other large SUVs'. If Bush I's Gulf War made the Hl, Bush II's Iraq War is unmaking the H2. Far from impervious, as SW buyers like to suppose their vehicles make them, our troops have proved alarming- ly mortal in their Hummers, every night on the evening news. 'Ilrms out they might as well have been driving the substantially cheaper and more fuel-efficient Jeeps that Hummers replaced in our arsenal. They make smaller targets. Before one gets to feeling too sorry for them, remember that when they went after civilians, GM and Hummer dealers invested in a brand that appealed to the least altruistic, most hostile elements of the American motorist They went long on. a militaristic and impos- ing machine. Then a war started and went badly. Nobody ever went broke underestimat- ing the intelligence of the American people. But GM and Hummer dealers bet on the worst in us, and they may lose some money because of it kI AUGUST 2004 SUGGESTIONS: 1. The existing glare-producing lighting at the Dealership be repaired or replaced, to meet the sign code. 2. Since speed limit signs and the occasional radar- wielding police officer slow traffic for only a few days, I propose that permanent speed bumps be installed, next to the dealership (not in front of existing homes, which would be subject to the noise of a double "ka-bump.") As a condition of zoning approval, the minimal cost of these should be born by the Medved dealerships. 3. Zoning only be approved if there are concrete plans to get employee parking off the street. 4. No more car abandonment on the street. 5. That Medved management hold a meeting company wide, and instruct their employees that Parfet is a residential street, not a race or test track. 6. A brick wall, 8 feet in height, be constructed on the southern and eastern borders of my property (not a barbed wire chain-link fence as exists across the street), paid for by Medved. This would block off a significant portion of the dealership lights, and would prevent me from viewing a parking lot and parts warehouse when I walk out of my door. 7. No zoning approval until design and construction of holding ponds are taken seriously. 8. A redesign of the proposed Hummer dealership, making it compatible with the existing dealership. 9. No second dealership be allowed. Wheat ridge is not "AUTO ROW." 10. Medved proposal shows Wadsworth ditch being piped. Six months ago, the Wadsworth ditch company wanted to pipe this ditch through my property, and indeed had the plastic pipes stacked in my front yard. With the kind help of Greg Rogers and the President of the ditch company, this proposal was scuttled, inasmuch as the ditch provides a very relaxing and important atmosphere for my home, is a source of drinking water for many creatures, and has significant historical importance (the oldest off of Clear Creek, circa 1860). It is only about 15 feet of exposed ditch that runs through the rear of the Medved proposal. 11. At the rear of my property, on my property, is a 100+ year old willow tree--certainly one of the oldest in the city. This tree abuts the Medved proposal. I would not like to see this tree harmed by any needless trimming on the Medved property side. 12. Finally, I see that Wheat ridge planning is proposing a 60 foot street right of way at the north end of my property, which would put a thoroughfare 3 feet from my bedroom. I have been fighting this for about 5 years, as reflected in the Wheatridge staff report. Indeed, the road was to pass at the back of Medved's existing property; he opposed it then, and rightly so, for security reasons. Years ago, the road was to continue straight to Ward Road; now I see that it simply bends north, to connect with Ridge Road. My opinion Another massive road effort to save a motorist or trucker 15 seconds of commute time. I suggest that "Road Building Efforts" instead concentrate on the impending Kipling congestion due to Super Target, and the many adjacent businesses which will be redeveloped. And in that vein, I suggest a study for a traffic light at the southern end of Parfet Street, where it meets the I-70 frontage road. In the morning hours, this intersection is definitely hazardous to one's health. INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER Council Bill No. 11-2005 Ordinance No. _ Series of 2005 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE FROM A-1, AGRICULTURE-ONE AND C-1, COMMERCIAL-ONE TO PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPEMENT AND FOR APPROVAL OF AN OUTLINE DEVELOPEMENT PLAN FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4900 AND 4990 PARFET STREET (CASE NO. WZ-05-05) BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO THAT: Section 1. Upon application by Michael G. Pharo Associates for Bear Land Holdings, approval of a zone change from A-1, Agriculture-One and C-l, Commercial-One to Planned Commercial Development and for approval of an Outline Development Plan for property located at 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street and pursuant to the findings made based on testimony and evidence presented at a public hearing before the Wheat Ridge City Council, a zone change and Outline Development Plan are approved for the following described land: PARCEL A: A TRACT OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16; THENCE NORTH 00'01'12" EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, 448.01 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF THE DENVER AND NORTHWESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT-OF- WAY AS RECORDED IN BOOK 126 AT PAGE 583 IN THE CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 74°07'34" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT- OF-WAY, 549.56 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF PARFET STREET AS RECORDED IN BOOK 155 AT PAGE 424 IN THE CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE OF JEFFERSON COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 00°04'24" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY, 96.86 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID DENVER AND NORTHWESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF PARFET STREET NORTH 00°06'56" WEST, 633.78 FEET TO A POINT BEING 247.50 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE ATTACHMENT 3 SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16; THENCE NORTH 89°43'46" EAST, PARALLEL WITH AND 247.50 FEET DISTANT WHEN MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID NORTH LINE, 530.21 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16; THENCE SOUTH 00°O1' 12" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 582.83 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. PARCEL B: THAT PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, 528 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EAST LINE OF PARFET STREET; THENCE SOUTH, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF PARFET STREET, 247.50 FEET; THENCE EAST, PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, 528 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 247.50 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1329 AT PAGE 127 OF THE JEFFERSON COUNTY RECORDS, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON. STATE OF COLORADO. Section 2. Vested Property Rights. Approval of this zone change and Outline Development Plan does not create a vested property right. Vested property rights may only arise and accrue pursuant to the provisions of Section 26-121 of the Code of Laws of the City of Wheat Ridge. Section 3. Safety Clause. The City of Wheat Ridge hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is promulgated under the general police power of the City of Wheat Ridge, that it is promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare of the public and that this ordinance is necessary for the preservation of health and safety and for the protection of public convenience and welfare. The City Council further determines that the ordinance bears a rational relation to the proper legislative object sought to be attained. Section 4. Severabilitv. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, or part of this Zoning Code or the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall for any reason be adjusted by a court of competent jurisdiction invalid, such judgment shall not affect application to other persons or circumstances. Section 5. Supersession Clause. If any provision, requirements or standard established by this Ordinance is found to conflict with similar provisions, requirements or standards found elsewhere in the Code of Laws of the City of Wheat Ridge, which are in existence as of the date of adoption of this Ordinance, the provisions, requirements and standards here shall supersede and prevail. Section 6 . This Ordinance shall take effect 15 days after final publication. INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first reading by a vote of to on this 27 h day of June, 2005, ordered published in full in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Wheat Ridge and Public Hearing and consideration on final passage set for July 25, 2005, at 7:00 o'clock p.m., in the Council Chambers, 7500 West 291h Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final reading by a vote of to , this day of 2005. SIGNED by the Mayor on this day of 2005. GRETCHEN CERVENY, MAYOR ATTEST: Pamela Y. Anderson, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM BY CITY ATTORNEY GERAL DAHL, CITY ATTORNEY 1s` publication: 2°d publication: Wheat Ridge Transcript Effective Date: V o o N ~ o c~ 4 04 w cl (410) 94 0 0 N C~ 0 a 0 U J ~ ~ I Q 0 L f 1 L Q 0 L n s_ (U N VJ W cu~~ _Q d d ' Q d! LL Q a d <t cv O Lu F' Q i LJJ f ? 1 , Q Y rs $ P t s - i 4 Vy 5 4 4 i-s 75 d ~ c ~ E * E ••ix ~~a 4 n 7 Y cc J x ~v r •J i~ C:-~ O ~ - ss -b~Y 'n ~ v C x C's 10 fU is U s~rl ~.4 3 _ _ _ i wV n vt' U G y o - s MY m Y k' i g } ~ J~ Y_ -FS a 3 e~F g r Q 3 _ €.ydit YtF [ t s fi'i [ ess r ~ ass 4 ~ e ` A 4 ~f i • ~I V (4V 0 N Piz y U ~ O COO U 4-o U O (4W) W U N N U `E 0 0 ~ E* o U O U PIZ U p ~ ~ ZS O w COO 0: m r••~ U U= O p 5~• U p G~ N , S ~ CM 4-o O W O 4-a y U Cd F.4 (Z 'Z WD (Z W It 4~-' Ste' • O O p Z COO W .r, U c ~~U O O ~OZ 'v= 0 Q) P-0 ~ GAS -4"' U Cl O v, y y~ O y O COO U =t to c~ p U0 O a M P.M P* ~ 'O 'O U V1 1~ i~l ~+M 4Z •i~i N M ~ • ~j V •M V V N 0 U U U U a~ U y N y .P.M O N v o ~ N 3 U O U a~ U 4-0 ~ CCU C~ 40 'ZS COO =0 ~Oo 4-' o . 4--o O `v 04 - O .C.~ a•~"~ U~ O U ~Oc-~.~ CJO O ~ ~ C.4 JZ G~ U 0 ~ O y U V 4-0 COO U U ono rA •ROO '+"iLa r-~ I bA v ~ ~ 4no Piano C oN • Rolm • 0 CC G~ vs G~ ;F, O U r4 N M V z w N G~ .WAIM N 4 O N ~ w OPP* W O bA ~r GA • W M m kl~ v 4-4 0 0 "CIO V1 4000 . ~ boo v O 4-4 V ~ ~ y ~ o ~ v •W X10 v N 0 0 Cd O M v~ • y ~ ~ mumm 4.0 O 0 Polo 00 G1 RZ W -4110 a~ V N O v N o • N O ~ O O ~ ~ c v 0 UPC CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE m PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT CO[ORPOO TO: Planning Commission CASE MANAGER: M Reckert CASE NO. & NAME: WZ-05-05Bear Land Holdings DATE OF MEETING: May 19, 2005 ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a zone change from A-1 and C-1 to PCD and approval of an Outline Development Plan LOCATION OF REQUEST: 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street APPLICANT/OWNER: Michael G. Pharo Associates for Bear Land Holdings APPROXIMATE AREA: 10.59 acres PRESENT ZONING: A-1, Agriculture-One and C-1, Commercial-One COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Agricultural/Estate Residential ENTER INTO RECORD: (X) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) ZONING ORDINANCE (X) DIGITAL PRESENTATION Q SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS Location Map A-1 - Existing Dealershi Properties P1D- rProp sed Loc tion ~HI I PCD k A-t L 'l PID I -j PCD ! . P D, C 2 \k~\\\\ ° fat n-t ( Pl I PIDa~ JALKDG~'FASL'J Planning Commission WZ-05-05Bear Land Holdings 1 All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. L REQUEST This application is for approval of a zone change from Agriculture-One and Commercial-One to Planned Commercial Development and for approval of an Outline Development Plan for properties located at 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street. The purpose of the zone change is for the construction of two new auto dealerships and an office/warehouse for parts distribution. See applicant's explanation of the request. (EMAiifi licanrletter) II. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The property in question is comprised of two parcels containing a total of 10.59 acres. It is located on the eastern side of Parfet Street and extends over to Oak Street. The southern parcel is zoned C-1, Commercial-One. The northern parcel is zoned A-1, Agriculture-One. . The property is relatively flat, has a house and several outbuildings on the very northern part. An open ditch (Wadsworth Ditch) runs along the north side of these buildings. Two additional open channel ditches (Bayou and Swadley) traverse the southern end of the property. Abutting the property to the north is a single family residence zoned A-1 and the detention area for the Hoss Planned Industrial Development. Although this detention area will serve the industrial development to the north, it is also zoned A-1. The L & K Industrial Park Planned Industrial Development abuts the property on the east, as does the 70 West Industrial Park which is also zoned PID. To the south is a 100' wide strip of land zoned C-1 owned by Xcel Energy. Beyond that is a triangular strip of land zoned C-2 and A-1 which has two billboards on it. This parcel separates the subject property from the north I-70 Frontage Road. The original dealership of the Medved Autoplex is located to the west, across Parfet Street. A new or used car sales facility is a special use in the Commercial-One zone district. A new or used car sales lot is not a permitted use in the A-1 zone district. Pursuant to the Zoning and Development Code, all commercial zone change applications must be to a planned development district. 111. PROPERTY HISTORY The following is a brief history of the Medved Autoplex history which includes property located at 11001 W. 1-70 Frontage Road North (Chevrolet, Hummer, Cadillac), 11201 W. 1-70 Frontage Road North (Chrysler, Plymouth, Jeep and previously-owned vehicles) and vacant property on the east side of Parfet Street which is subject to this zone change requestb~~aenalp o 4 The property (all three parcels) was rezoned from Agriculture-One to Commercial-One pursuant to Case No. WZ-86-10. The rezoning encompassed all three parcels and included a condition that prior Planning Commission WZ-05-05Bear Land Holdings to any development, a site plan approval process be completed in front of Planning Commission and City Council. A two-lot subdivision was approved which divided the property on the west side of Parfet into two parcels (Case No. MS-86-3). A site plan was approved for the Chevrolet dealership (11001 W. I-70 Frontage Road North) with a special use permit to allow major automotive repair (Case No. SUP-86-10). In 1994, the owner applied for a planned building group plan to establish an interim used car sales operation on the westerly parcel (11201 W. I-70 Frontage Road). The interim site plan allowed for a 25' x 55' modular building to serve as a sales office. The northern half of the site was proposed as a test track for Hummer testing. In 1998, the applicant applied for an amendment to the recorded planned building group for 11201 W. I-70 Frontage Road to allow construction of two buildings containing a total of 98,000 square feet of building area. An additional building with 9000 square feet of area was proposed on the north end of the property. This building was intended to serve as a child care facility for employees. A 10' right- of-way vacation also occurred for West 50a' Avenue which was dedicated back to the property owner. In 1999, the dealership was cited for having illegal vehicle storage on the vacant property on the east side of Parfet. In response to the citation, an application was submitted for approval of a temporary use permit to allow temporary vehicle storage. The request was denied by the Board of Adjustment on December 9, 1999. The applicant filed suit with the Jefferson County District Court against the City of Wheat Ridge and the Board of Adjustment. The court upheld the decision of the Board of Adjustment. IV. OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN The Outline Development Plan (ODP), which accompanies a rezoning ordinance, sets the allowable uses and development standards for the property. Typically the Outline Development Plan is general in nature and serves as the blueprint for development of the property. The Outline Development Plan is also used to establish design parameters including maximum building height, minimum landscaped coverage and minimum perimeter setbacks1,P_'N_'N_f3{xOutlrrie Allowable uses Permitted uses include auto sales and rental, warehousing and parts distribution and repair and detailing. Staff suggested that the use list be expanded to allow test driving and general office, service and retail uses. The additional uses have been added to the ODP. Access Two access points are shown on both Parfet Street and Oak Street. Both access points align with the existing curb cuts on the dealership to the west. Development Standards The following development standards are depicted on the ODP. The existing development and any future redevelopment of the site must comply with these standards. Planning Commission 3 WZ-05-05Bear Land Holdings Item Requirement Maximum Building and Hard Surfaced Coverage 80% Minimum Setbacks 50' from r-o-w if parking, 30' from r-o-w if landscaped (west and east) 30' from single family homes (north) 15' from external and internal property lines (south) Minimum Landscaped Coverage 20% Minimum Parking Required Refer to Section 26-501 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws for additional requirements Maximum Building Height 50' Signage Refer to Article VII of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws Fencing Refer to Section 26-603 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws Exterior Lighting Refer to Section 26-503 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws Architectural Detail Refer to the Streetscape and Architectural Design Manual Staff concludes that the proposed development standards are generally consistent with those in the Commercial-One zone district regulations. All requirements for a Planned Commercial Development Outline Development Plan have been met. V. ZONE CHANGE CRITERIA Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a change in zone. 1. That the existing zone classification currently recorded on the official zoning maps of the City of Wheat Ridge is an error. The official zoning map is not in error. The parcel is currently zoned Agriculture-One and Commercial-One. 2. That a change in character in the area has occurred due to installation of public facilities, other zone changes, new growth trends, deterioration, or development transitions, and that the evidence supports the finding of the following. Planning Commission 4 WZ-05-05Bear Land Holdings This could be considered a transitional area in the City of Wheat Ridge. Although there are four existing single-family residences to the north (along Parfet), the general trend in this neighborhood is towards more commercialization of properties. The agricultural identity of the area is diminishing, and development is transitioning towards light industrial and commercial uses. The majority of the property under consideration was rezoned from A-1 to C-1 in 1986. Land to the north of this property was rezoned from A-1 to PID pursuant to Case No. WZ-02- 12 (Hoss). The intent of the zone change was for development of an electrical contractor's yard. There are other industrial uses to the northeast of the site including Inland Container and the Rocky Mountain Bottle plant, which have undergone plan revisions and expansions in the past several years. Although not in Wheat Ridge, a major commercial development is under construction at 50`s Avenue and Kipling. The property is in close proximity to I-70 which carries increasingly more traffic each year. 1995 traffic counts indicate that 99,600 vehicles per day travel on this portion of I-70. A more recent CDOT count performed in 2001 indicated that the vehicle trips per day have increased to more than 105,000. 3. That the change of zone is in conformance, or will bring the property into conformance, with the City of Wheat Ridge comprehensive plan goals, objectives and policies, and other related policies, and other related policies or plans for the area. When the property was rezoned to C-1 in 1986, the Comprehensive Plan designated it as Industrial. The existing Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 2000. The designation on the current future land use map is Agricultural/Estate Residential (AER) (Not to exceed one unit per acre). The AER designation describes the desired character as "Neighborhoods with very low density housing and a predominantly rural character." Desired attributes include well maintained dwellings, lots comprised of primarily open lands, the ability to raise domesticated farm or ranch animals, the ability to construct accessory structures that assist in the production of value-added agricultural products, and densities not to exceed one dwelling unit per acre. The desirability of this area as estate lots within such close proximity to I-70 and adjacent commercial and industrial uses is questionable. The Comprehensive Plan Designation for the subject property is AER, but property directly to the east and further to the north is shown as Planned Business/Industrial Park. The proposed commercial zone change is inconsistent with the designation on the Comprehensive Plan. 4. That the proposed change of zone is compatible with the surrounding area and there will be minimal adverse impacts considering the benefits to be derived. The subject property is surrounded by a variety of land uses including a single family residence zoned A-1 on the northwest side of the property. On the northeast side of the property is land zoned A-1 to be utilized for detention area for a PID to the north. The PID was approved pursuant to Case No. WZ- 02-12 as a zone change from A-1. It is intended to be utilized as an electrical contractor's business. To the east is a mixture of light industrial and commercial uses. To the west are the existing dealerships and farther west commercial and industrial uses. Planning Commission 5 WZ-05-05Bear Land Holdings The zone change will be compatible with adjacent commercial and industrial uses but not the residential properties to the north along Parfet Street. 5. That there will be social, recreational, physical and/or economic benefits to the community derived by the change of zone. There will not be social, recreational or physical benefits to the community as a result of the change in zone. If the property is developed there may be an economic benefit to the city through property tax increases since the property is presently undeveloped land. Sales tax revenues from the sales of vehicles are credited to the municipality where the buyer resides. There would be sales tax generated from parts sales. 6. That adequate infrastructure/facilities are available to serve the type of uses allowed by the change of zone, or that the applicant will upgrade and provide such where they do not exist or are under capacity. All agencies can serve the property with upgrades to infrastructure, the cost of which will be home by the applicant. 7. That the change of zone will not adversely affect public health, safety or welfare by creating excessive traffic congestion, creating drainage problems, or seriously reducing light and air to the adjacent properties. The proposed development of this parcel could have a negative affect on the residences north of the property. At the neighborhood meeting, the adjacent neighbor spoke regarding the glare and light generated by the existing dealerships. The development of this site will have an added impact on this residence. One of the major impacts of the dealership has been parking. The Zoning and Development Code requires that commercial developments provide all parking for customers, employees and inventory on-site. In each of the previous land use approvals for the dealership, the issue of cars parking on Parfet Street was addressed. The most recent approval (1999) specified that parking could occur on Parfet Street only during construction of the newest dealership. The most recent inspection showed 52 vehicles parked along Parfet. Unless this new facility addresses this parking issue and provides adequate on-site parking, the present practice of parking on Parfet will continue to adversely affect neighboring residents. There are also concerns regarding regional drainage. This property is located within the Columbine Basin Drainage Outfall plan area. According to the plan adopted by Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, there are conveyance facilities shown running north along Oak Street to W. 50th Avenue and extending over to Parfet Street. An additional conveyance facility would run adjacent to the Xcel Energy parcel to the south. Although preliminary drainage information was provided, it is unclear at this time whether the proposal can accommodate the Columbine Basin improvements {El;Tit ~1*anzL , Co.urj me'B~a e Planning Commission 6 WZ-05-05Bear Land Holdings 8. That the change of zone will not create an isolated or spot zone district unrelated to adjacent or nearby areas. Spot zoning is not a concern as there is other commercial zoning in the area. VI. WEST 50TH AVENUE The issue of extension of W. 50th Avenue has been debated since the original parcel on the west side of Parfet was platted. W. 50th Avenue currently extends from Miller to Oak Street, east of the subject parcel and from Robb Street east where it dead-ends into a cul-de-sac on 11201 W. I-70 Frontage Road North (western Autoplex parcel). 1986: In the mid-1980's, an amendment was made to the Major Streets Plan of the Comprehensive Plan. This amendment designated an arterial street corridor between Mpling Street and Ward Road. Since 50th was a logical extension, 40' of right-of way was dedicated for 50th Avenue as part of the two-lot subdivision approval on the parcel on the west side of Parfet in 1986. 1994: During the 1994 Planned Building Group approval for an interim used car sales operation on 11201 W. I-70 Frontage Road North, the applicant indicated that he felt it was premature to develop 50th Avenue at the time, but would be willing to participate when the time was appropriate. A condition of City Council approval was that W. 50th be constructed on both sections of the Medved property when a building permit for the western parcel is issued. 1998: As part of the PBG review for a permanent dealership on 11201 W. I-70 Frontage Road, street construction plans for 50`b Avenue were reviewed and it was indicated that these improvements should be completed on both lots connecting to Parfet prior to issuance of a C.O. The street extension was needed as the plan relied on 50th Avenue for the unloading of vehicles on the north end. The plan was approved by City Council on July 13 but was reconsidered at the next meeting (July 27). The reconsideration allowed construction of a cul-de-sac off 50th on the north side of the property (in lieu of full street extension) with the vacation of the southern 10' of that right-of-way. Further, that the designation for 50th be changed from an arterial to a collector and that 50th Avenue would only be completed if and when the residential properties to the east on Parfet are developed for industrial or commercial uses. 2000: The new Comprehensive Plan is adopted. The connection of 50th Avenue between Parfet and Oak Street is deleted on the Roadway Classification Map. 2003: During the final development plan and plat hearings for Case No. WZ-03-08 (Ross PID), Public Works requested a 25' wide dedication for 50th Avenue extending west from Oak Street. The purpose was to reserve one-half of the right-of-way width in the event 50 is extended from Oak Street to Parfet. This condition was not included in the motion for approval and no right-of-way dedication occurred. Planning Commission WZ-05-05Bear Land Holdings Staff feels the construction of W. 50`h Avenue between Oak Street and Parfet is still critical. Not only would it allow a secondary access route through this industrial area but could also be used as a channel for the Columbine Basin drainageway improvements. Staff will be recommending the dedication of right-of-way at the time of final development plan and plat approval. VII. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING A meeting for neighborhood input was held on May 18, 2004. Recap and; EzhTtbta~Attenclance,List) VIII. AGENCY REFERRALS All affected service agencies were contacted regarding the ability to serve the property. The developer will be responsible for any needed upgrades to accommodate the proposed development. Specific referral responses follow. Arvada Fire Protection District: AFPD expressed concern regarding life safety and fire department access due to the congestion on Parfet Street by employee parking. They are strongly recommending that any land use approvals be considered to relieve this parking congestion. Ditch Companies: The three affected ditch companies want to review changes to the current ditch configurations as part of the final development plan and plat process. Valley Water District: Valley Water District has adequate capacity to serve the project. Additional water main lines, fire hydrants or fire sprinkler lines may be needed. Urban Drainage and Flood Control District: UDFCD does not usually object to zone changes, but has concerns with this one. The preliminary drainage information provided deviates from the approved Columbine Basin Outfall Systems Plan. They would prefer to have an open channel system and are not sure this can be accommodated with the intensity of the development being proposed. Public Works Department: The Public Works Department has reviewed preliminary drainage and traffic information. They have requested additional information be provided at the time of final development plan and plat. This would include a Traffic Impact Study analyzing the proposed affect on I-70 Frontage Road North. Public Works recommends future construction of W. 50`h Avenue, and that sufficient right-of-way be dedicated at the time of final development plan and plat. In regards to storm sewer issues, Public Works will require sufficient right-of-way to construct the drainage facilities as described in the Columbine Basin, Outfall Systems Planning. Construction of the facilities will be required at the time of construction of the Autoplex expansion. The proposed development will require extension of the Arvada Channel from Miller Street to Oak Street to service the property. The City may assist Medved in the construction of the Arvada Channel by participating in partial reimbursement if necessary. Extension of the Arvada Channel from Oak Street to Parfet may also be required to service the proposed expansion development and/or the existing Medved Autoplex. IX. FINDINGS OF FACT/RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS Staff has made the following findings of fact. Planning Commission WZ-05-05Bear Land Holdings 1. The majority of the property under consideration was rezoned from A-1 to C-1 in 1986. 2. The design parameters shown are generally consistent with the C-1 zone district regulations. 3. The proposed document meets all requirements for a Planned Commercial Development Outline Development Plan. 4. There has been a change in character in the area as evidenced by new commercial development occurring to the west of the property in the past seven years, an approved rezoning to PID to the north of the property in 2002, and construction of a major commercial center at 501i and Kipling. 5. Although not in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan designation, the designation of Agricultural Estate Residential did not acknowledge the presence of commercial zoning on the property. Large lot residential development is inconsistent with the trend of commercial and industrial development in the area. 6. A majority of the property is already zoned commercially. The proposed zone change is compatible with the surround area and there will be minimal adverse impacts. 7. There will be economic benefits to the community derived from the zone change. 8. Adequate infrastructure is available to serve the proposed development. 9. The change of zone will not adversely affect the public health, safety or welfare. 10. The change of zone will not create an isolated zone district. Staff would suggest the following conditions be included in a motion for recommendation of approval: 1. All parking for the Medved Autoplex (all three parcels) shall be accommodated on site. There shall be no exceptions. 2. Lighting shall be designed and located such that there shall be no light trespass onto adjacent properties or streets from pole mounted lights, wall mounted lights and lighted signs. 3. Adequate right-of-way dedications for Oak Street, W. 501i Avenue and Columbine Basin storm water drainage facilities occur at the time of final development plan and plat. X. SUGGESTED MOTIONS: Option A: "I move to recommend APPROVAL of Case No. WZ-05-05, a request for approval of a zone change from Agriculture-One and Commercial-One to Planned Commercial Development and for approval of an Outline Development Plan for properties located at 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street: 1. The majority of the property under consideration was zoned from A-1 to C-1 in 1986. 2. The design parameters shown are generally consistent with the C-1 zone district. 1 The proposed document meets all requirements for a Planned Commercial Development Outline Development Plan. 4. There has been a change in character in the area as evidenced by new commercial development occurring to the west of the property in the past seven years, an approved rezoning to PID to the north of the property in 2002, and construction of a major commercial center at 501i and Kipling. 5. Although not in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan designation, the designation of Agricultural Estate Residential did not acknowledge the presence of commercial zoning on the property. Large lot residential development is inconsistent with the trend of commercial and industrial development in the area. Planning Commission 9 WZ-05-05/13ear Land Holdings 6. A majority of the property is already zoned commercially. The proposed zone change is compatible with the surround area and there will be minimal adverse impacts. 7. There will be economic benefits to the community derived from the zone change. 8. Adequate infrastructure is available to serve the proposed development. 9. The change of zone will not adversely affect the public health, safety or welfare. 10. The change of zone will not create an isolated zone district. With the following conditions 1. All parking for the Medved Autoplex (all three parcels) shall be accommodated on site. There shall be no exceptions. 2. Lighting shall be designed and located such that there shall be no light trespass onto adjacent properties or streets from pole mounted lights, wall mounted lights and lighted signs. 3. Adequate right-of-way dedications for Oak Street, W. 50`h Avenue and Columbine Basin storm water drainage facilities shall occur at the time of final development plan and plat." Option B: "I move to recommend DENIAL of Case No. WZ-05-05, a request for approval of a zone change from Agriculture-One and Commercial-One to Planned Commercial Development and for approval of an Outline Development Plan for properties located at 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street: L The proposed commercial zone change is inconsistent with the Agri culture/Estate Residential designation on the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed commercial development could be incompatible with the existing residences to the north. 3. There are regional drainage issues affecting the property which are unresolved." Planning Commission 10 WZ-05-05Bear Land Holdings Michael G. Pharo Associates, Inc. March 25, 2005 Ms. Meredith Reckert Senior Planner City of Wheat Ridge 7500 West 291h Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215 Re: Medved Colorado : Rezoning Dear Ms. Reckert: Enclosed is our rezoning submittal for the Medved property in Wheat Ridge, Colorado. This submittal consists of an Outline Development Plan, traffic study, preliminary drainage study and other supporting documentation as required. The submittal fee of $2475.00 is also enclosed. This rezoning is to allow expansion of the existing Medved facilities. This development will occur in a manner consistent with applicable City regulations. At this time, we anticipate a phased development consisting of an initial new car dealership, an area of inventory parking, a service and parts storage facility and ultimately another new car dealership. Of particular interest is the manner in which the property drains. In order to move the property forward in a timely manner, we are proposing to utilize a temporary retention pond until such time as the City, Medved, Urban Drainage and Flood Control Authority, perhaps the County, and others can find a cost effective way of implementing off-site drainage facilities. We will be constructing the retention pond concurrent with the initial new car dealership and phasing the development into a permanent drainage solution as quickly as practical. We anticipate working with your Public Works Department to arrive at a workable solution to the drainage issues prior to processing the ODP. Please let me know if I can do more at this time. MGP/las John Medved Dennis Polk Marshall Fishman EXHIBIT 1 2835 West Oxford Ave., #6, Englewood, Colorado 80110 • phone: 303/783-3772 • fax: 303/783-3773 • e-mail mplandplan@aol.com - - _ .~.~..n. ~ mow. ~ y,r:~ i~~~ ~:S g; _ • in e ~ { , u ~ Pay - _ j: _ A' ~ Vicinity ~ a so W. 64TH AVE. "I'~i ~ BE CO W. 58TH AVE. SE SO ~ TO M~~ MYWU ~ C t ~ ! rr~ ~~1 N p AT qpq,, 1',7F'~':a,:.r.: ~ SA .A~1 b ~~~T iWltl,'m rY tlW+ firy . v*rH ~ ~ 1 _ ~ 1-, .e SUBJECT ~ ! AL 3 1-~o w ' Ai W. 44TH AVE. S A e~,= Va:.- M ,a„~ t w m ,~q ~ ..per;... pn~_. y kFn a :sir E ~ ,n ~fi ~.:m 9~~.'.. wen a~~ ~ ~ _ ~ _ _ ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ A u 1 a ?N ~ C CO-58 w3gTx AVE. ~j ~ T P W. 32~ AVE. ~ T H ~ S ~ ~ ~ S ~ ~ B ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ s 0 ~q r, P W. COLFAX AVE. m. - 0 2500 5~ FORTH S B S Character of Development: S T The property will be developed as ~n extension of the Medved Autoplex located to the P west. Through logical extensions of vehicular access routes and edge treatment, the S property will consist of two new automotive dealerships and a distribution center L consisting of offices, servicing and warehousing. Development will be consistent with the goals, policies and objectives of the City of Wheat Ridge. T E T Statement of Proposed Zoning: t nt~ 1 rr~~ ► vi ~ , ~ . >u llealersnip ,~e `l.: N Si na e: A11 signag . Location o~ oa s~gnage s~a~l ~e 1n con~ormance ~vl~n xr~lcle v o~ ine SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE b9 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL ,`r,° -f- ti.. Wheat Rid peat Ridge bode of Laws. iV1ERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ` O ~ a BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE ~ `\drf~, Lighting: All exterio exterior lighting shall be in conformance with Section SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAILI z ~(l~ cif the whet Ric~~e C``c~de cif Law~_ SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, 528 FEET, MORE OR LESS, T~3 THE EAST LINE OF PARFET STREET; THENCE SOUTH, ALONG THE EAST LINE CAF PARFET cTREET, 247.5 FEET; TNEN~'E FAST, YAR.ALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE a~' Perimet SAID SOUTHIIAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUAR`TEK, 5'L& FEET, MORE C~k ~ ~ Landscap LESS, TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST' QUARTER; THENCE NORTH, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 247.5 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO ~ THE POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1329 AT PAGE 127 C}F~ Dealer Locati THE JEFFERSON COUNTY RECORDS, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, `4 _ This rezoning request is intended to consolidate existing parcels of land zoned ~ S the purpose of expanding the existing Medved Autoplex. This use of the property is STATE OF COLORt~DO. ~ ~~~G rn i Agriculture-One (A-1}and Commercial-One (C-1) into a Planned Gommerciat Lone for ~ ti`~~~fi/ f7 f i t L_ consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado as 3 4 w~`/ lti stated in the Comprehensive Plan. Subsequent Site Plan submittals will detail the specific nature of the architecture and landscape improvements. I Surveyors Certification: - ~ I, Roger A. Vermaas P.L.S. 24968, a duly registered professional land surveyor in the ~ ~g2 st s Ownership Statement: ~ ~ The owner of the property is Bear Land Holdings, LLC, dha Medved Colorado. state of Colorado, do hereby certify that the lands described and shown hero~z are the o ~ ~ same lands as surveyed by me or under my direct supervision and checking, prepared in °oo .1. accordance with Colorado State Statutes 38-51-106. Z R Roger A. Vermaas C Colorado Professional Land Surveyor P.L.S. 24968 g Unified Control Statement: h T The owner of the property which pertains to this Outline Development Plan(ODP), Bear I 1 Land Holdings, LLC, dba Medved Colorado, intends to retain ownership of all ODP components and accepts responsibility for all exterior maintenance on the property. 1 _ of Owner's Certification: The below-signed owner, or legally designated agent thereof, does hereby agree that the i•~ property legally described hereon. will be developed as a Planned Commercial community Development Director: Development in accordance with the uses, restrictions and conditions contained in this s, pion, and as may otherwise be required by law. Owner further recognizes that the r L approval of rezoning to Planned Commercial Development, and approval of this Outline Community Development Director DevelopmenC Plan, does not create a vested property right. Vested property rights may only arise and accrue pursuant to the provisions of Section 26-121 of the Wheat Ridge 1 Code of Laws. Bear Land Holdings, LLC Planning Commission Certification: 3°-c_ 1, Recommended for approval this day of 20 , by t the Wheat Kidge Planning Commission. By: John Medved Medved Colorado 11001 W. Frantage Road N. Chairman J Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Y NOTARY PUBLIC Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of , 20 _ Cit Council Certification: County Clerk and y This document accepted for filin Approved this ---day of lu nY Lpe Jefferson County at Golden, Col( gin, Colorado, on the clay of , 20 _AD, Wheat Ridge City Council. in Book Page Reception No. Prepared On: March 21, 2005 s 2005 Witness my hand and official seal. Revised On: May 11, 2005 3 (1l1 S My commission expires Attest: JEFFERSON COUNTY CLER City Clerk Mayor r.nrr AX Til T> Lf`~1DTlCT? Notary Seal: Recorder City Seal: s d HERE ,NNW I~ UATCF x~ City of Arvada I 13 f _ I I c. 1 ,EXTEND LOCAL COLLECTOR 1 _g LINE AS.NEEDED ST L aD v•;' > OWtN2'pCP ~y-74 Refs II • s J I.. ow Raw 77 3 \~sy. - I - 2w 137+ ..?41+eL I T. ;City °of 1Nheat Ridge 1 lJ<.. .1 I I%l -N-~ ❑ - - I ) if t .n /T'SJ E,- _ o \ 1 -~~~~atii-'.r-l it~Y i~,..F :l L. f - y--~-•-- - ~ b~'i ~l -Y - STA 138+20 TO 182+20 400 LF 24-RCP Q1.1% i ,l s I 0s=22cis 280 LF 24-RCP @18 `+00 STA 162+20 f Os=22cM1 Y yl y iI I - STA 183+00 TO 170+00 $00 LF 241RCP ®1.1% YOOd Os=9c1s PROIESOE7ENTION FOR STORMS f2--C!',,,t~.>~ GREATER TNAN 10-YR FREQUENCY STA 170+00 TO 174+00 110 9WROVEMENTS REOUWEO 400 LF 24-RCP ® 0.5% (CITY OF ARVADA OWNERSHIP) Q4=9cfs _ J. GENERAL NOTES 1.) 1N5 OIIiFALL RAW" DOMPAI 1T IS COICEPTUAL OILY. THE OIJIT I M1FY SHONN PRIMES A IIAATR DRAOIVl NFINOMI NT1HN TM: PRQ[CT 90N1EARY. LOCAL sl(0REPT015 Intl H REQUIRED TO SERVE TR9UTARI AREAS UPSTREAM O NO ADIACEW TO TIE PROPOSED OITF SYSTEII. ALL FEATURES SFXAIN (CHANEL$ EP83 M STORY SNO6• DEMMON PONDS, ETC.) ARE PROPOSED OME35 NOTED AS OmTNG. 2.) NMIES SIONN ARE EYSED OR NFORIIATXN SWPIhD W LOCAL GD113m NIS AM) URAM CONVMM PLW YEN LOCATIONS ARE APPROXNIATE. THE ELEVAT1316 OF Al URIDES SIONN ARE BLED ON T19XAL COYER DEPMS. OR AS N0ICAIED 9T YER110.L DATA PAUADE'O. YEMFTDRTIDIT otURTIT LOCA NG DEP01 6 NECESSAIrf PRIOR TO FINN DESIGN OF TRESS ASTER PWNIED FALARES. 3.) ALL EIEATIOIES SNONN N PUN NO PROFIE ARE BAST D ON A DAR111 ES(A$S4ED FOR TMS PROJECT 110PPIAIG 4.) BNET LOCA106 ARE SHO RI AT SCIO)AA C LOCATIONS OFAY. INIR ER BAFS71C.1TNM 6 REOUISD. 1) . ON-SRE DETENT0.11 6 REWI9EITDED FOR OEYELOPYEN6 TRBlfTNO' TO THE ARVADA OWeEl U ApOSDLT1016 ARE RE E FOR OPI.QEHTA1gN OF WP-SIR DEM111001 FOE NEY DO'ODPIENMS uaicA"°"rw oaw."r`: n o'o° ~wwrC.'A~AI .1. MULLER ENGSNEEMC COMPANY, INC. •0ro•.Arrc rArrsa n: IAA " 11Ar CT#RAR70TO FNCaTEFRS co.T. M1T•A14: A r44T m SOUQI IRADSMORTH BOUIEYAM .AU r lD. A" n1sM auum.s Ass ru. >u A:.'fl O.TYa • 1lxEAY'CM10, mLO~ *.O r.r codas srtx.1 .AI ..I ..I n+NOAl . r•OncT r.. 9022 -`y~ STA 148+20 TO 153+20 500 LF "-FtCP Q0.4% 0s=107cfs TO 158+20 '@'0.5% L STA slq ROW r sx Os= cy e~"'I j :~C l s, o `LLB O, r - o fl o ' STA 142+20 TO 143120 100 LF 481RCP 00.5%" Os=107c1s STA 143+20 TO 145+20 $00 LF "-RCP ®0.3% 0s=107cts soo o xoo 400 EXHIBIT 4 URBAN DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT COLUMBINE BASIN CITY OF ARVADA CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE OUTFALL SYSTEM PLANNING CONTRACT NO. 90.05.08 10 TO 29+00 i ; f J3 It J ,__1---•,ti~ Tai.. Y~l i ;lv GA 137-► AASS-U D.35% { Lam' ~ N 80fif 84"RCP c „-QO-S%, Os-51?,c1s I Of. s_> a L> 5 i / ;CO, ROW W tiF,F WI ~c F f I r r T y 7L S GR C i r s 1 v~ 0 j ROW t>1{RED ; O STA 00) 1 \ 5% bas= tt; r r} ' DOOSLE rXAr %,sc sx ts. Am-- ®0.35% wvvw a r tes - + _ - ._-n.VVL TTWLLf' Ilt0v ~w~7(i EXHIBIT 5 c ~GRA -1 J @0.3~%- =J x 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 303/ 235-2846 Fax: 303/235-2857 The City of Wheat Ridge Date: May 18, 2004 City Staff Present: Meredith Reckert Location of meeting: City Hall second floor glass conference room Property address: 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street Property owner(s): Medved Colorado Property Owner(s) present? No. Applicant: Mike Pharo (land planning consultant), Wendell Ayers (civil engineering consultant) Existing Zoning: C-1 (Commercial-One) on southern two-thirds and A-1 (Agri culture-One) on northern one-third Comprehensive Plan Designation: AER, Agricultural Estate Residential (Not to exceed one unit per acre) Existing Use/Site Conditions: The property is located north of the north I-70 Frontage Road and is comprised of 10 acres of land running between Parfet and Oak Streets. There is an existing residence with out-buildings on the A-1 parcel. The rest of the property is vacant. The property is relatively flat with three ditches that traverse it. Applicant's Proposal: Applicant is proposing to rezone the property to Planned Commercial Development. The development of the property would be in two phases; the first phase would be to develop a parking area to alleviate overflow parking on Parfet Street by employees and inventory. The second phase would be for full development of the property including an additional car dealership, a warehouse with service center and the parking and display and storage of automobiles. Issues Discussed: The city of Wheat Ridge has a requirement for the separation of adjacent display lots. Won't this violate that separation requirement? Relief from the 1500' separation requirement can be sought through either a special use permit process or through a planned development zone change application. Will there be economic gain to the city if this is approved? Impact of the project on traffic in the area. EXHIBIT 6 • Parking of employee vehicles on Parfet. It was noted that a parking study may be required as a part of the application. • What will happen with Oak Street? It is presently substandard to the city's requirement for local streets and a 30' right-of-way dedication will be required. • Will 50th Avenue be extended between Oak and Parfet? The neighbors in attendance do not support the construction of 50th. It was also noted that City Council did not require dedication of the north side of 50th Avenue during recent land use approval action directly to the north of the subject site. • What will happen to the ditches on the property? The applicant indicated that they will be piped. • Sight distance, excessive speeds and safety on Parfet Street. • Internal policies on the existing Medved car lots which exacerbate negative impacts on Parfet Street. • Noise generated by the existing car lots. • Lighting on the existing and proposed car lots. It was noted that a photometric plan would be required with the zoning application for final development plan approval. • Security and problems related to vandalism on the existing Medved lots. • Proposed signage on the property • Status of the billboards on adjacent property to the south. Chuck Stiesmeyer, 4996 Parfet Street, submitted digital photos of vehicles parked on Parfet Street and views from his property to the west. He also submitted photos of lighting on commercial properties in the area, as well as a newspaper article regarding light pollution. ~O 00 J 0+ lli A W N C ~ V Z w 0 w o. W w CD D M r m D m -o z D m z m C CD 0 = Cl) 2) OR 3 2 W . Z CD > o O cch 2 !v r" ° p 0 m a, . ~ 0 N X m z O ti a y 0 3 (D EXHIBIT 7 POSTING CERTIFICATION CASENO. VV2-0S-OS P ING COM SSION / CITY COUNCIL / BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (Circle One) HEARING DATE: s f 9/ 0 5 I. residing at (n am e) (address) as the applicant for Case No. wZ - 6 5'o 5 , hereby certify that I have posted the Notice of Public Hearing at WVJ AA-C Ctvy HA1-1_ (location) on this day of , 20 , and do hereby certify that said sign has been posted and remained in place for fifteen (15) days prior to and including the scheduled day of public hearing of this case. The sign was posted in the position shown on the map below. NOTE: This form must be submitted at the public hearing on "s case and will be placed in the applicant's case file at the Community Development Department. MAP eAplanningWoms\postingeert Rev. 111103 7500 West 29th Avenue Colorado FAX 303/235-2857 May 5, 2005 Dear Property Owner: Ridge This is to inform you of Case No. WZ-05-05 which is a request for approval of a rezoning from Commercial-One (C-1) and Agricultural-One (A-1) to Planned Commercial Development (PCD) and approval of an outline and final development plan for properties located at 4900 & 4990 Parfet Street. This request will be heard by the Wheat Ridge Planning Commission in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue. The meeting will be held on May 19, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at 303-235-2846. Thank you. Planning Division. The City of C?Documenm and SettingftathyM4y GocumentsVCthyWC"TSTLA GCOWcnotice\2005\wz505wyd 1 7>(!- 5119/0-~ - petroScan / Jefferson (CO) . Owner :Steismeyer Charles Parcel :042703 Site :4996 Parfet St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :09/24/1997 Mail :4996 Parfet St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 7004 2890 0001 6401 3865 Use :1112 Res, Improved Land Bedrm: l Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1929 Pool: B1dgSF :624 Ac:.41 * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Hoss David C Parcel :092775 Site :5130 Parfet St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :03/07/2002 Mail :5130 Parfet St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 7004 2890 0001 6401 3872 Use :1112 Res, Improved Land Bedrm: 5 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1960 Pool: B1dgSF :1,189 Ac:3.48 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Bear Land Holdings Llc Parcel :043765 Site :4990 Parfet St Wheat Ridge 80033 Vc---A nA loc lllnn Mail :11001 W I-70 Frontage Rd N Wheat Ridge Cc 8C 7004 2890 0001 6401 3889 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1927 Pool: B1dgSF :1,017 Ac:2.58 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Powell Vaudis M Parcel :043769 Site :11221 W I-70 Frontage Rd S Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered 6401 3896 Mail :20 Box 415 Victorville Ca 92393 7004 2890 0001 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land ~,,une Bedrm: 2 Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1929 Pool: B1dgSF :624 Ac:1.91 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :National Advertising Company Parcel :043805 Site :4800 Parfet St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :11/06/1973 Mail :185 Us Highway 46 Fairfield Nj 07004 7004 2890 0001 6401 3902 Use :2111 vacant, Commercial Bedrm: Bath: Tot Rm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF : Ac:.43 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Bellegante John A Parcel :043850 Site :4760 Parfet St Wheat Ridge 80033 " Mail :4760 Parfet St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 7004 2890 0001 6401 3.919 Use :5178 Misc,Residential,Mixed Use Land Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm:l YB:1941 Pool: B1dgSF :1,816 Ac:.92 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Wehling Frank W Parcel :043918 Site :5006 Parfet St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfararl r0loalonnl Mail :5006 Parfet St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 7004 2890 0001 6401 3926 Use :4141 Agr,Grazing Land Pnone - - Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1942 Pool: B1dgSF :1,500 Ac:1.86 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :City "K Wheat Ridge _ Parcel :052458 Site :10625 N 70 S 'ce Rd #I70 Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :03/29/1999 Mail :7500 W Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :31 nd,Improve nd Phone Bedrm: Bath: Tot :.1 YB:1972 Pool: B1dgSF :38,685 Ac:2.86 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Nation Advertising Co Parcel :136632 Site :*no Site A Xfered :04/04/1977 Mail 185 Us' ighway 4 field Nj 07004 Price :$7,300 ~ Use i 11 Vacant,Residential Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF : Ac:.81 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner. :Lic Investments Inc Parcel :176621 Site :5000 Oak St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :10/17/1986 Mail :PO Box 1149 Austin Tx 78767 7004 2890 0001 6401 3933 Use :3111 Vacant,Industrial r„u„o - Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF : Ac:.98 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Bear and Holdings Llc Parcel :193121 Site :11001 N 70 Service #'T'70 N~heat Ridge 80033 Xfered :07/01/1997 Mail :11001 N I 70 ice Rd #I70 Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :2112 Co proved Phone Bedrm: ath: TotRm:l YB:1987 Pool: B1dgSF :58,202 Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. /j * Search Parameters * Jefferson (CO) * 5/5/2005 * 8:23 AM Parcel Number... 15 39 163 00 015 39 163 00 016 39 163 00 007 39 163 00 008 39 163 00 022 39 163 00 023 39 163 01 004 39 163 02 001 39 164 00 015 39 164 01 004 39 164 02 001 39 164 02 004 39 164 02 005 39 212 00 002 39 212 00 003 Charles Steismeyer David Hoss & Bonita Hoss Bear Land Holdings Llc 4996 Parfet St 5130 Parfet St 11001 W I-70 Frontage Rd N Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Vaudis Powell National Advertising Company - John Bellegante & Sharon Bellegante PO Box 415 185 Us Highway 46 4760 Parfet St Victorville, CA 92393 Fairfield, NJ 07004 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Frank Wehling city O at dge Nationa dve g Co 5006 Parfet gSt 7500W Afh -Nve 185 Us 46 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Whint Ridge, CO 033 --fa' el d, NJ 0700 Lic Investments Inc Bear Land oldings Bear nd Holdin PO Box 1149 11001 N I 7 'ce Rd #I70 11001 on age Rd N Austin, TX 78767 Wheat edge, CO 8 Whe ge, 80033 New World Ventures Llc Mary Cytrynbaum Colorado Industrial Portfolio Llc 5875 N Rogers Ave 4530 S Vorrena 1512 Latimer St #325 Chicago, IL 60646 Denver, CO Denver, CO 80202 01 $ 004 00-004 00-005 ~ ozz.az sa \ mz'~T a a W7 v ~ 00-007 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ooa i =LJu 00-015 AT RIDGE s -1 v I ✓ - i 02-001 02-0& > w 00-016 i C~ bd 5 r ig Chevrolet rI ~ I naa, i. , m Jam,. I gebPg 02-001 00-023 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x.50 Fk6N7AGEtib - o W2 T 00-003 00-001 i 00-002 3 y/~ - - - 01 004 - I I ' 29]52 50s.06'- 351.23' ' (111501 I i ICI I i 02-001 P 02-002 2-008'..... (279.]4' e ' 9 ]9') . ; I Q . 190.80 p 02-007 I I WH T I Ent 6ial Park u 02-004 02-003 00-002 {ll 1 2]9.01' (385.32' " _ 59 1 i - 02-006 " m 02-005 26951 _ 0296\ 03-001 4\H 03''-' 4 a rehouse Rclate " to i 8.7 - % ' 00-012 00-023 i 284.51' 00-014 Dame 00-015 21359 05-001 02' V 00-023 ` r I n Bee 1263.20 W-02a 473.01' 1284.3P 270.71- j - Pt FWOWAGE RD I I i - - - -IdO-FRONTAGE- RU-- - - - - - - NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge PLANNING COMMISSION on May 19, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the Municipal Building at 7500 West 29°i Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. The following petitions shall be heard: Case No. WZ-05-05: An application filed by Michael G. Pharo Associates for approval of a rezoning from Commercial-One (C-1) and Agricultural-One (A-1) to Planned Commercial Development (PCD) and approval of an outline and final development plan for properties located at 4900 & 4990 Parfet Street and legally described as follows: PARCEL A: A TRACT OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16; THENCE NORTH 00°O1' 12" EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, 448.01 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF THE DENVER AND NORTHWESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY AS RECORDED IN BOOK 126 AT PAGE 583 IN THE CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 74°07'34" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY, 549.56 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF PARFET STREET AS RECORDED IN BOOK 155 AT PAGE 424 IN THE CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE OF JEFFERSON COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 00°04'24" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY, 96.86 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID DENVER AND NORTHWESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF PARFET STREET NORTH 00°06'56" WEST, 633.78 FEET TO A POINT BEING 247.50 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16; THENCE NORTH 89°43'46" EAST, PARALLEL WITH AND 247.50 FEET DISTANT WHEN MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID NORTH LINE, 530.21 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16; THENCE SOUTH 00°O1' 12" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 582.83 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. PARCEL B: THAT PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, 528 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EAST LINE OF PARFET STREET; THENCE SOUTH, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF PARFET STREET, 247.50 FEET; THENCE EAST, PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, 528 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 247.50 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1329 AT PAGE 127 OF THE JEFFERSON COUNTY RECORDS, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. Kathy Field, Administrative Assistant ATTEST: Pamela Y. Anderson, City Clerk To Be Published: Wheat Ridge Transcript Date: May 5, 2004 ti~0~ WHEAT,pO i v m c0<ORPOO The City of 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Wheat Ridge Planning Department 303-235-2846 NOTICE TO MINERAL ESTATE OWNERS APPLICANTS: You must submit this completed form to the Community Development Department no later than ten (10) days before the public hearing on your application. Failure to complete and submit this Certification of Notice shall constitute sufficient grounds to reschedule your public hearing. 1,Jhn F{ed✓o~l as K)anzwx~ of/with~erAJ- 1..0-nA f~lG1 n (1~' (Print name) (Posit n/Job Title) (Entity applying for permit/approva (hereinafter, the "Applicant"), do hereby certify that notice of the application for (describe type of application) set for public hearing on 200_, has been sent to all mineral estate owners at least thirty (30) days before the public hearing, as required by § 24-65.5-103(1), C.R.S., or, in the alternative, that the records of the Jefferson County Clerk and Recorder do not identify any mineral estate owners of any portion of the property subject to the above referenced application. ® Check here if there are no mineral estate owners of any portion of the subject property. I hereby further certify that I am authorized by the Applicant to make representations contained herein and act as the Applicant's agent for purposes of this Certificate of Notice and bind the Applicant to these representations by my signature below. -tx '-'o Dated this 0 day of 140f-d'l Z, 2005, City of Wheat Ridge of ""EqT~ Community Development Department m Memorandum c~CpRp0~ TO: Dave, Steve FROM: Meredith SUBJECT: Medved Traffic Impact DATE: May 13, 2005 Attached is supplemental information regarding the traffic impact for the Medved Expansion. Please review and comment at your convenience. 05x13/2005 08:20 3033331107 LSC TRANSPORTATION PAGE 02/02 ~U MEMORANDUM LSC CONSULTANTS, INC. 1889 York Street Denver, Colorado 80206 (303) 333.1106 FAX- 13031333-1107 e•mall laenlaedenver.com DATE: May 12, 2005 TO: ~vlr.M,ich~a . Pharo FROM: 1)~ave L Ruble r. SUBJECT: Response to Traffic Engineering Comments (LSC #040880) The Traffic Engineering Department for the City of Wheat Ridge provided five comments on the proposed Medved Autoplex Dealership Expansion. Three of the comments were related to the traffic impact analysis report dated March 24, 2005. What follows is my response to these three comments. Comment No. 1 - Please provide trip projections for two different land uses as indicated in the study; automotive dealership and distribution center. Response - The proposed expansion site will contain a portion of the existing Medved Autoplex dealerships. Two of the existing dealerships that are currently located on the existing dealer- ship site will be transferred to the proposed expansion site. This is why traffic counts were collected at the existing facility. Approximately 50 percent of the existing activity was moved from the existing facility to the proposed expansion site. It was felt that this expansion would result in additional visitors to the expanded Medved Autoplex site (existing facility plus the proposed expansion site). Comment No_ 2 - Please provide reference for the background growth data source. Response - The Colorado Department of Transportation estimates the annual growth rate for I-70 near the proposed expansion site to be approximately 1.5 percent. Even though the frontage road is not expected to experience the same growth rate, the I-70 annual growth rate was used which would be a worst case scenario. Comment No. 3 - Point of clarification, Parfet is classified as a residential street not a collector as indicated in the study. Response - This clarification will be reflected in any future traffic impact analysis reports prepared for the proposed expansion- DLR/wc \\Sene _0\1U~oervtr\LSC\ffoleexs\2004\040880\hlemolteapoodhWMWI,ad tdgecommeno.wpd City of Wheat Ridge Deparhnent of Public Works MEMORANDUM TO: Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner FROM: Dave Brossman, Development Review Engineer DATE: May 12, 2005 SUBJECT: Medved ROW - Info for the ODP The proposed Medved Expansion development between Oak Street and Parfet Street will require street and storm sewer improvements. The street and storm sewer improvements shall lie within public Right-of-Way to ensure proper maintenance of these facilities. Street Improvements Oak Street: 30.00 feet of Right-of-Way is required. 50th Avenue: Public Works recommends future construction of 50th Avenue, and the sufficient dedication at this time to construct the future roadway. Storm Sewer Ridge Road Tributary: Sufficient Right-of-Way should be provided at this time to construct the drainage facilities as described in the Columbine Basin, Outfall Systems Planning, December 1994. Construction of the facilities shall be required at the time of the Medved Expansion development. Arvada Channel: The proposed development will require extension of the Arvada Channel from Miller Street to Oak Street to service the property. The City may assist Medved in the construction of the Arvada Channel by participating in partial reimbursement if necessary. Extension of the Arvada Channel from Oak Street to Parfet may also be required to service the proposed expansion development, and/or the existing Medved dealership. XC: Tim Paranto, Director of Public Works Steve Nguyen, Engineering Division Manager File To Mere - Medved Expansion (5-12-05) Michael G. Pharo Associates, Inc. May 12, 2005 Ms. Meredith Reckert Senior Planner 7500 West 29`h Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215 Re: Medved ODP Dear Ms. Reckert: The following text documents our response to various comments provided by you in your letter to me of April 27, 2005. 1. The title of the ODP has been revised as you directed. 2. Adjacent land uses have been added to the Site Plan. 3. Ditches which exist on the property have been added to the Site Plan. 4. The title for the Planning and Development Director has been changed. 5. At this time, we have no specific site design details for the subject property. Based upon our preliminary studies, we have shown the approximate locations for buildings, parking, inventory storage, and landscaping. 6. Bearings and distances have been added to the Site Plan. 7. Oak Street is shown and labeled as requiring a 30 foot dedication. 8. Based on your recommendation we have added "general office", "service and retail establishments" and "restaurants" to the list of allowable uses. We have also added "vehicle demonstration" to the list of allowable uses. We think this is a more accurate and gentle description as opposed to "vehicle test driving". 9. Parking ratios provided are based upon our experience with similar types of facilities. We have always known that a "parking study" will be required. With your direction, we need to define the parameters of the study so that we can meet the FDP submittal timing. 10. No comment, no response. 11. No comment, no response. 12. Again, we have no specific site plan in place at this time. Square footages and percentages of the lot are provided for buildings, paved areas and landscaped areas based upon stated development criteria. 13. A Development Schedule has been provided. 14. A Unified Control Statement has been provided. 15. A case history box has been provided showing case numbers going back to 1986. 16. Setbacks have been provided per our conversation. Minor "red-line" requests on the ODP, though not numerically listed, have also been made. Please note that we have provided an ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey as part of our submittal. This survey should take precedent over the ODP graphic even though some of the survey information has been transferred to the ODP at your request. We changed the description of our land use areas to eliminate potential confusion with the Parcel A and Parcel B designations on the survey. 2835 West Oxford Ave., #6, Englewood, Colorado 80110 • phone: 303/783-3772 • fax: 303/783-3773 • e-mail: mpluidplan@aol.com 2 Dave Brossman's letter to me of April 26, 2005 covered comments related to the ODP and the traffic study. We showed the Oak Street dedication as 30 feet on the Site Plan graphic of the ODP. Dave's five comments on the traffic study are being addressed by Dave Ruble. His revised study has been provided to you. Sparky Shriver of the Arvada Fire Protection District has noted the existing parking situation on Parfet Street. The development of the proposed improvements covered by this ODP should alleviate this condition. Bill DeGroot of Urban Drainage and Flood Control District has noted the existing drainage situation. As you are aware, we are working with City Staff to determine an acceptable solution to the drainage situation. We intend to have further meetings the week of May 16, 2005. We intend, at a minimum to have an understanding that the drainage can be handled. We would like to provide the details of the understanding including temporary and permanent drainage facilities, a description of all on-site and off-site facilities, and an overview of phasing and economic impact. Mr. Robert Arnold of the Valley Water District has outlined the criteria to provide water service for the project. The District can provide service per their standard rules and regulations. It is our understanding that sanitary sewer service will be provided by Clear Creek Valley. Mr. Don Feland of the Bayou Ditch Company has responded that the applicant needs to sign their standard agreement. I believe this covers the response comments to date. Thanks for your assistance. Let me know if I need to do more prior to the Planning Commission meeting on Thursday, May 19, 2005. MGP/las c: John Medved Diana Blanch Dennis Polk Marshal Fishman Bruce McLennan Wendell Ayers 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 303/235-2846 Fax: 303/235-2857 April 27, 2005 Michael G. Pharo Associates, Inc. 2835 W. Oxford Avenue Unite #6 Englewood, CO 80111 Dear Mr. Pharo: The City of Wheat Ridge I have reviewed your submittal for approval of an outline development plan and have the following comments: 1m 1. The title should read as follows: "Medved Chevrolet Planned Commercial Development, Outline Development Plan, An Official Development Plan in the City of Wheat Ridge, A Parcel of Land....." 2. Show adjacent land uses. 3. Show and identify the ditches crossing the property. 4. Change the title for Planning and Development Director to Community Development Director in both the signature block and Streetscape Manual reference. 5. Show use areas on the drawings including building pads and general areas to be landscaped and paved. 6. Show bearings and distances on drawing. 7. Modify the note regarding dedication for Oak Street to indicate a 30' right-of-way dedication by a future plat document. 8. If any of the property is to be used for vehicle test driving, the use list should include test driving. Staff also thinks it may be wise to expand the use list to allow general office, service and retail establishments, including restaurants. 9. The parking ratios provided are not consistent with those in the zoning and development code. Please provide an explanation. Because of parking issues with the other Medved Autoplex lots, a parking study will be required for all properties under this ownership with the final development plan submittal. 12. Show project. data for the entire site including, by phases, approximate building area, paved area and landscaped area. This data should be shown as square footages and percentages of the total lot. 13. Include a development schedule by phase. 14. Add a unified control statement. 15. Add a case history box with the following case number: WZ-05-05 16. The setback information shown is confusing. The requirement for the Outline Development Plan is only minimum perimeter setbacks. Staff would suggest a 50' setback from the front property line (south), 30' side setbacks adjacent to existing streets and a 30' setback from the rear (north). Attached is a redlined plan. Also attached are referrals received from other city departments and outside agencies. Public Works Department: See attached letter from Dave Brossman dated April 26, 2005. Arvada Fire Protection District. See attached email response from Sparky Schriver dated March 11, 2005. Urban Drainage and Flood Control District. See attached mail response from Bill DeGroot dated April 18, 2005. Valley Water District. See attached letter from Robert Arnold, dated April 19, 2005. Bayou Ditch Company: See attached email response from Donald Feland dated April 22, 2005. This concludes the summary of comments. Please address each of these comments by revising the drawings accordingly. For clarification on any of these issues, please feel free to contact any of the Development Review committee members: Community Development Meredith Reckert 303-235-2848 Public Works Dave Brossman 303-235-2864 Traffic Engineering Steve Nguyen 303-235-2862 As you know, this case is scheduled for public hearing in front of Planning Commission on May 19, 2005. I will need the revisions no later than May 11, 2005 to prepare the staff report which is distributed to the commission on May 13, 2005. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at 303-235-2848. Sincerely, Meredith Reckert, AICP Senior Planner C: Case No. WZ-05-05 2 ~t DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS City of Wheat Ridge Department of Public Works 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 April 26, 2005 Mr. Michael G. Pharo Michael G. Pharo Associates, Inc. 2835 West Oxford Avenue #6 Englewood, CO 80110 303.783.3772 (303) 235-2861 FAX (303) 235-2857 Re: - First Review Comments of the Medved AutoPlex Outline Development Plan and Traffic Impact Study. Dear Mr. Pharo, I have completed the first review of the above referenced documents received on April 4, 2005, and have the following comments: Outline Development Plan 1. The Oak Street Right-of-Way dedication needs to be shown as 30.00'. Traffic Engineering A copy of the Traffic Impact Study has been forwarded to the Engineering Division Manager, Mr. Steve Nguyen, P.E., 303-235-2862 for review, and the following is his response: I have reviewed the traffic impact study dated March 24, 2005 for the above site and have the following comments: 1. Please provide trips projections for two different land use as indicated in the study; automotive dealership and distribution center. 2. Please provide reference for the background growth data source. 3. Point of clarification, Parfet is classified as a residential street not a collector as indicated in the study. 4. 30 feet of right of way dedication will be required on Oak Street. This is needed to construct Oak Street to a full functional width from Oak Street to the I-70 North Frontage Road. 5. It may be best for the developer's consultant to inquire with CDOT whether the TIS will need to be reviewed by its office for any impact on the Frontage Road. Please revise as per the above comments and resubmit for the further review. The above comments are as. of the date reviewed and may not reflect all comments from other departments or reviewing agencies. If you have any questions, please contact me at 303-235-2864. Sincerely, David F. Brossman, P.L.S. Development Review Engineer CC: Steve Nguyen, Engineering Manager Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner Bill Weyman, Field Services Supervisor File Medved AutoPlex - ODP & TIS reviewl. tr Meredith Reckert From: DONALD FELAND [dlfelan@msn.com] Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 9:08 AM To: Meredith Reckert Subject: WZ-05-05 The Bayou Ditch Co received this plan and will review plans after applicant signs our standard agreements, they need to contact me and I will send agreements to them. send to Don Feland -8975 Grandview Ave- Arvada Co 80002-Telephone 303 421 2277 thanks Don Feland 04/19/05 TUE 14:03 FAX 303 424 0828 VALLEY WATER DIS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 12101 WEST 52ND AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80033 TELEPHONE 303-424.9661 FAX 303-424-0828 April 19, 2005 Meredith Reckert Case Manager City of Wheat Ridge 7500 W. 29a` Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Dear Meredith: In reference to Case #MS-WZ 05-05/ Pharo for Bear Land Holdings at 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street, Valley Water District has reviewed the inquiry and offers the following comments: 1. Valley Water District can provide water service to your proposed development subject to Valley Water District rules and regulations. 2. Valley Water District is supplied water through a distributors contract with the Denver Water Department and must follow Denver Water operating rules and regulations- 3. Valley Water District currently has adequate contract to serve the project. The District must also with regard to drought and conservation that may be 4. Additional water main lines, fire hydrants or meet Arvada Fire Protection District requirements u y through our Denver Water all Denver Water mandates sprinkler lines may be needed to t would be at owner's expense. If additional water main lines, fire hydrants oq fire sprinkler lines are needed, the owner would need to provide any necessary 8. Each separate building structure will require separate water tap. The owner will be responsible for the cost of the taps and water service lines. 9. Owner will be required to provide a recorded plat of the project to the Valley Water District. R001 The District would like to meet with the developer tolfinalize water line plans and address any concerns prior to the final approval of the project. 04/19/05 TUE 14:03 FAX 303 424 0828 VALLEY WATER DIS 16 002 If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely,,' Robert Arnold District Manager Page 1 of 1 Meredith Reckert From: Bill DeGroot[bdegroot@udfcd.org] Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 2:38 PM To: Meredith Reckert Subject: Case No. WZ-05-05, Medved We have the following comments to offer: 1. We normally don't object to rezoning proposals, but we do have concerns with this one. 2. The only drainage information is contained in a letter from Paragon Engineering to David Brossman. The letter acknowledges the Columbine Basin Outfall Systems Plan (OSP), but proposes to change every part of it as it involves the subject site. 3. We prefer open channels when you get to the large discharges involved here. Pipes and culverts are not necessarily prohibited, but Wheat Ridge should be aware that the District will not provide maintenance assistance for underground facilities. 4. If open channels are required, will the site still be large enough for the proposed uses? 5. The Arvada Channel between Miller and Oak may not be this developer's responsibility, but if he wants to develop before the channel is in place he may have to build it. In summary, there are numerous drainage issues involved with this site. Whether the approval of this rezoning would adversely affect the city's ability to implement the OSP is something we can't answer but want to bring to your attention. Bill DeGroot, PE Manager, Floodplain Management Program Urban Drainage & Flood Control District 4/18/2005 City of Wheat Ridge of WHEgT Community Development Department Memorandum (4 c~CORA~ TO: Barb FROM: MXredith SUBJECT: Medved Zone change DATE: April 12, 2005 The Community Development department has received a request for approval of a zone change to accommodate the Medved Hummer Dealership. The property is located at 4900/4990 Oak Street and is currently zoned A-1 and C-1. Attached is a copy of the outline development plan for your comment. We know they are trying to move ahead quickly. They have requested a May 19 Planning Commission date. Let me know if you need anything else. F `NHE7T Community Development The City of 7500 West 29th Avenue m Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Wheat Rlidae 303.235.2846 Fax: 303.235.2857 Community Development Referral Form I Date: April 5, 2005 Response Due: April 26, 2005 The Wheat Ridge Community Development Department has received a request for approval of a zone change from Agriculture-One (A-1) and Commercial-One (C-1) to Planned Commercial Development and approval of an outline development plan on property located at 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street. No response from you will constitute having no objections or concerns regarding this proposal. Case No.: WZ-05-05/Pharo for Bear Land Holdings Request: Rezone from Agriculture-One (A-1) to Commercial-One (C-1) to Planned Commercial Development (PCD). The property is approximately 10.59 acres in size. The Outline Development Plan will establish allowed uses and all development standards. A Final Development Plan will establish a site plan for the intended use to be processed at a later date. The intent of the zone change is to allow for a vehicle sales lot. Please respond to this request in writing regarding your ability to serve the property. Please specify any new infrastructure needed or improvements to existing infrastructure that will be required. Include any easements that will be essential to serve the property as a result of this development. Please detail the requirements for development in respect to your rules and regulations. If you need further clarification, contact the case manager. Case Manager: Meredith Reckert Voice: 303.235.2848 Fax: 303.235.2857 Email: mreckert@ci.wheatridge.co.us Water District (Valley) Sanitation District (Clear Creek Valley) Fire District (Arvada) Adjacent City Jefferson County Planning Department Xcel Energy Owest Communications Colorado Department of Transportation Denver Regional Council of Governments JeffCo Health Department JeffCo Schools Bayou Ditch Co. JeffCo Commissioners AT&T Broadband Urban Drainage and Flood Control District Regional Transportation District Wheat Ridge Post Office Wheat Ridge Police Department Wheat Ridge Public Works Wheat Ridge Parks & Recreation Department Wheat Ridge Forestry Division Wheat Ridge Building Division Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority "The Carnation City" ~~~E *PARAGON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. March 25, 2005 David F. Brossman, P.L.S Development Review Engineer Ci O t25 ty of Wheat Ridge 7500 West 29th Avenue - t j Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 RE: Medved Rezoning Drainage Improvements Requirements Dear David, The purpose of this letter is to propose, at a conceptual level, the feasibility and design characteristics of the proposed development and drainage system to support the zoning process. Thank you and Steven Nguyen for meeting with us regarding the above referenced project. We have purchased and reviewed the Outfall Systems Planning Columbine Basin (OSP), by Muller Engineering Co., Inc., dated December 1984. We understand that the Arvada Channel identified in that OSP is to be constructed to solve the drainage problem for the area. It is also our understanding that a portion of the recommended outfall improvements for the Arvada Channel will be constructed as a part of the Arvada Ridge Project located just west of Kipling Avenue. The Arvada Channel will be constructed to just west of Miller Street. The Arvada Channel would need to be extended westerly from Miller Street to Parafet Street in order for development of the Medved site to occur. The reach within the site between Oak Street and Parafet Street will be located within the existing power line easement on the south end of the Medved property. A recommended R-O-W acquisition of 80 feet for an open channel within the existing power line easement is suggested by the OSP. We would propose a box culvert instead of the open channel located on the Medved property within a drainage easement. This would allow parking within the easement over the box culvert. The OSP mandates detention with the development of the site. The site plan will incorporate a detention pond with the development. We may explore the option of utilizing underground detention. We acknowledge The City of Wheat Ridge is a Phase H NPDES municipality and that water quality features will need to be incorporated into the site plan. Flow from the two existing storm drain inlets in Parafet Street will be piped through the site to the Arvada Channel. In addition to the Arvada Channel, the OSP indicates that a proposed open channel known as the Ridge Road Tributary is to be constructed within the property along the west side of Oak Street. The OSP proposes a 60-foot R-O-W for the Ridge Road 7852 South Elati Street, Suite 203 / Littleton, CO 80120 / (303) 794-8604 / FAX (303) 795-3072 Tributary. We would propose placing the Ridge Road Tributary in a pipe and place it within the Oak Street R-O-W. The OSP indicates the Arvada Channel reach from Miller Street to Oak Street would need to be constructed to complete the channel connection from this site to the portion constructed by the Arvada Ridge Project. This reach is offsite of the Medved site, and is a regional facility in nature. We do not believe the responsibility of constructing this reach should entirely home by Medved. As alternatives we would propose to construct on-site detention with a water quality feature whereas storm flows would be treated prior to release. The release would. Another alternative would be retention of on-site flows per UDFCD recommendations whereof the discharge flow would be treated by default. This completes our proposed drainage concept for the rezoning application. We will prepare a preliminary drainage report addressing in more detail the drainage design at the time of a site plan submittal. Should you have questions, please call me. Thank you. Sincerely, /X71~ Thomas A. Gardner, P.E. Project Manager cc: Mike Pharo, Michael G. Pharo Associates, Inc. TAG/jml F:UOBS/04006/docs/requireddrainage.imprmements.3.25.05 *TARAGON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. MEMO March 25, 2005 rm~ To: Michael G. Pharo Associates, Inc. R From: Paragon Engineering Consultants, Inc. Re: Proposed Medved Hummer Dealership site at NE corner of Parfet Street and I-70 north Frontage Road. Drainage Issues The existing site drainage flows to the Bayou Ditch Co. which runs west to east through the site along the south boundary. We have assumed that this would be the path of drainage for the developed site. This is the natural low point of the site and the historic path of the existing runoff. All our design assumptions have been that we would design the site to provide detention and water quality. We would than release the runoff at historic rates into the ditch and that the ditch would be the outfall from the site. We contacted Don Felines; the manager of the Bayou Ditch Co., to discuss the drainage entering the ditch. He told us that the Bayou Ditch Co. would not allow any developed runoff to enter the ditch. He said that we would have to find a different route for the runoff from the site. We have looked at other alternates to using the ditch as our outfall from the site. There is no easy route for runoff from this site. Urban Drainage Flood Control District (UDFCD) has studied this area and have proposed an open channel that would someday be constructed to control runoff in this area. This is a concept and will be years before being implemented. We called the Wheatridge City Engineer; Dave Brosman, to discuss the problem. He said he knew there is a problem in this area in that the drainage all goes to the irrigation ditch. The ditch company has refused to allow developed runoff to enter the ditch with other developments. He said that in the cases where there was no other outfall for runoff the development was stopped. The city's position on this is that if there is no other route for the runoff but the ditch; the ditch company will need to give approval to allow the runoff to enter the ditch. The only alternative to using the ditch is to pipe the runoff away from the site. This would require the runoff to be piped to an outfall point such as an open channel, creek, or existing pipe system. Dave Brosman said that the closest pipe to this area he was aware of is at Miller Street to the east of the Medved site. If we were to pipe to this exist pipe we would need to analyze the pipe system and see if it has the capacity to take the runoff from the Medved site. The channel proposed by UDFCD may be the only solution. Based on our research; the drainage problem will require improvements off site that will require a study to determine the best solution. F:Vobs\04-006\do 'drainagemenwO325.05 7852 South Elati Street, Suite 2031 Littleton, CO 801201(303) 794-86041 FAX (303) 795-3072 LSC TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. 1889 York Street March 24, 2005 Mr. Michael G. Pharo Michael G. Pharo Associates, Inc. 2835 West. Oxford Avenue, #6 Englewood, CO 80110 Dear Mr. Pharo: 5' 3n_v; Denver, CO 80206 (303) 333-1105 FAX (303) 333-1107 E-mail: Isc@lscdenver.com Web Site: http://www.Iscdenver.com Re: Medved Autoplex Dealership Expansion Wheat Ridge, Colorado (LSC #040880) In accordance with our agreement, we have completed a Traffic Impact Analysis report for the Medved Autoplex Dealership expansion that will be located on the north side of the I-70 North Frontage Road between Parfet Street and Oak Street in Wheat Ridge, Colorado. The proposed expansion will consist of two new automotive dealerships and a distribution center consisting of offices, servicing and warehousing. The following summarizes our analysis. Site Location and Prooosed Access The location of the proposed Medved Autoplex Dealership Expansion site is shown in Figure 1. The site is located north of the I-70 North Frontage Road and is bounded by Parfet Street on the west, I-70 North Frontage Road on the south, Oak Street on the east, and residential development on the north. Access to the site will be provided via four full movement access points; two access points will be located along Parfet Street, which will align with the existing access points serving the existing Medved Autoplex site, and two access points will be located along Oak Street. Existina Street Network Figure 1 illustrates the location of the site with respect to the surrounding roadways. Major roadways in the vicinity of the site are described below. I-70 North Frontage Road is an east-west, two-lane, collector roadway. It begins on the west at Tabor Street and ends on the east at West 44`h Avenue. There are no plans to improve this facility in the vicinity of the site. Mr. Michael G. Pharo Page 2 March 25, 2005 ~co~~ Parfet Street is a north-south, two-lane, llec rroadway that runs between the I-70 North Frontage Road on the south an dge Road on the north. Parking is permitted on both sides of this roadway along the full length of the Medved Autoplex site. Parfet Street has Stop control at the I-70 North Frontage Road and Ridge Road. There are no plans to improve this roadway in the vicinity of the site. Oak Street is a north-south, two-lane, local road that runs between the I-70 North Frontage Road on the south and West 50`h Avenue on the north. On the eastern edge of the site, a 10-foot dedication for right-of-way on Oak Street has been made. This roadway has Stop control at the I-70 North Frontage Road. There are no plans to improve this roadway. Ridge Road is an east-west, two-lane collector roadway that begins on the west at Tabor Street and ends at Independence Street on the east. There are no plans to improve this roadway in the vicinity of the site. Existing Traffic Conditions Figure 2 shows existing traffic volumes, traffic control, and lane geometry at the intersections surrounding the proposed Medved Autoplex Dealership Expansion site. Turning movement traffic counts were collected during the AM and PM peak-hours by Counter Measures, Inc. in June, 2004. In addition, daily traffic counts were taken along Parfet Street, Oak Street, and the 1-70 North Frontage Road adjacent to the property. Of the three roadways adjacent to the site, the 1-70 North Frontage Road has the highest daily traffic count with 55570 daily vehicles using it, while Parfet Street has approximately 16.50 vehicles per day (vpd) just north of the 1-70 North Frontage Road and 800 vpd just north of the existing Medved Autoplex site. Oak Street has about 600 vpd using it. The actual turning movement and daily traffic volume count data are attached to this report. Trip Generation Table 1 shows the AM and PM peak-hour traffic generation estimates for the proposed Medved Autoplex Dealership Expansion. The traffic generation estimates contained in Table 1 were derived from the turn movement counts taken in June, 2004 at the three existing site access points of the existing Medved Autoplex site located to the west of the proposed expansion site. These peak-hour traffic counts were used to develop trip generation peak-hour rates for the existing site. It was assumed that the proposed expansion would result in a transfer of 50 < percent of the existing Medved Autoplex traffic generation to the new site as well as an additional increase of 25 percent. This means that the proposed expansion is approximately 75 percent of the existing Medved Autoplex traffic generation. As indicated in Table 1, the Year 2004 AM peak-hour is expected to have 105 vehicles entering and 45 vehicles exiting the proposed expansion site. During the Year 2004 PM peak-hour, it is expected to have 60 vehicles entering and 109 vehicles exiting the proposed expansion site. For the Year 2025, it was assumed that the proposed expansion site would experience an r< Mr. Michael G. Phazo Page 3 March 25, 2005 annual growth rate of 1.5 percent. Based on this growth rate, the Year 2025 AM peak-hour is expected to have 143 vehicles entering and 60 vehicles exiting the expansion site and during the Year 2025 PM peak-hour is expected to have 81 vehicles entering and 150 vehicles exiting the proposed site. Background Traffic Figure 3 depicts the Year 2025 background peak-hour traffic volumes at the intersections surrounding the proposed Medved Autoplex Dealership expansion site. The Year 2025 back- ground traffic volumes were based on an annual growth rate of 1.5 percent per year. Trip Distribution The directional distribution of site-generated traffic onto adjacent roadways, which provide access to and from the proposed development, is one of the most important components in the assessment of the proposed development's traffic impacts. Figure 4 shows the directional distribution of the new traffic to be generated by the proposed expansion of the Medved Auto- plex Dealership site. As can be seen in Figure 4, ten percent is expected to access the proposed expansion site from the north with five percent of the traffic using Ridge Road to and from the east and west each. It is expected that the majority of the site-generated traffic will use the I-70 North Frontage Road, with 40 percent of the traffic accessing the expansion site from the west and 50 percent of the traffic accessing the expansion site from the east. Traffic Assignment Figures 5 and 6 show the assignment of site-generated traffic onto the existing roadway net- work for the Years 2004 and 2025, respectively. These traffic volumes were derived by applying the traffic generation estimates of Table 1 to the distribution percentages identified in Figure 4. Total peak-hour traffic volumes were obtained by combining the site-generated traffic volumes from Figures 5 and 6 with the Years 2004 and 2025 background traffic volumes contained in Figures 2 and 3. The total peak-hour traffic volumes for Years 2004 and 2025 are illustrated in Figures 7 and 8, respectively. Traffic Impacts In order to assess the traffic impacts that will result from the proposed expansion of the Medved Autoplex Dealership Expansion, peak-hour capacity analyses were performed at all of the intersections surrounding the site for the AM and PM peak-hours. Analyses were performed for the AM and PM peak-hours for the Years 2004 and 2025 back- ground and total traffic conditions. The methodology used is that presented in the nationally accepted Highway Capacity Manual, 2000, published by the Transportation Research Board Mr. Michael G. Pharo Page 4 March 25, 2005 of the National Academy of Sciences. The concept of Level of Service (LOS) is used as a basis for computing combinations of roadway operating conditions. By definition, six different Levels of Service are used (A, B, C, D, E, and F) with "A" being a free-flow condition and "E" representing the "capacity" of a given intersection or traffic movement. The summary results of our LOS analyses are shown in Table 2 and the complete Synchro analysis printouts are attached to this report. The intersection Level of Service analysis has been performed on a total of seven intersections, four along Parfet Street (I-70 North Frontage Road, Access A, Access B and Ridge Road) and three along Oak Street (I-70 North Frontage Road, Access C and Access D). The analysis indicates that all of the traffic movements at the seven unsignalized intersections most impacted by the proposed expansion are expected to operate at a good Level of Service (LOS "C" or better) for both the Years 2004 and 2025 during the AM and PM peak-hour either with or without the traffic from the proposed expansion. Figure 9 illustrates the broader, "average daily traffic impacts that the proposed expansion would have on the surrounding traffic system in the Y ar 2025. As shown, these impacts are expressed in terms of traffic generated by the propo d expansion of the Medved Autoplex Dealership Expansion, as an increment of total pro' d traffic. As can be seen in Figure 9, Parfet Street is not exceed the daily capacity of a ollec r roadway. Oak Street is expected to exceed the capacity of a local roadway from the I- orth Frontage Road to Access D. Oak e~- Street should be improved to collector standards from the I-70 North Frontage Road to Access D. The I-70 North Frontage Road is not expected to exceed its roadway capacity. Conclusions Based upon the foregoing analysis, the following conclusions may be made regarding the proposed expansion of the Medved Autoplex Dealership: In the Year 2004, it is expected that during the AM peak-hour the site will have 105 vehicles entering and 45 exiting it and during the PM peak-hour, 60 vehicles will enter and 109 vehicles will exit the site. In the Year 2025, it is expected that during the AM peak-hour the site will have 143 vehicles entering and 60 exiting it and during the PM peak-hour, 81 vehicles will enter and 150 vehicles will exit the site. 2. The directional distribution of site-generated traffic is expected to be such that five percent of the traffic will use Ridge Road to and from the west and east each. It is expected that the majority of the site-generated traffic will use the I-70 North Frontage Road with 40 percent of the traffic accessing the site from the west and 50 percent of the traffic accessing the site from the east. 3. In the Years 2004 and 2025, all of the traffic movements at the seven unsignalized intersections most impacted by the proposed expansion of the Medved Autoplex Dealership are expected to operate at avery good Level of Service (LOS "B" or better) in the AM and PM peak-hours during the AM and PM peak-hours without the traffic from the proposed expansion. When traffic from the proposed expansion is added Jr, Mr. Michael G. Pharo Page 5 March 25, 2005 to existing and future background traffic volumes, all of the traffic movements at these intersections are expected to continue to operate at a good level of Service (LOS °C" or better) in the AM and PM peak-hours. 4. Traffic impacts associated with the proposed expansion of the Medved Autoplex Dealership are minor and can easily accommodated by the existing roadway network with the improvements recommended in this report. We trust that our findings and recommendations will assist in the planning for the Medved Autoplex Dealership Expansion. Please call us if we can be of further assistance. Respectfully submitted, LSC Transportation Co By: Dave L. Ruble, 1 DL'R/SHH/wc Enclosures: Tables 1 and 2 Figures I - 9 Existing Traffic Count Information Intersection Capacity Analyses (Synchro Printouts) Z:\[SC\Prole,i \2004\040880\Report\Fl-Me&ed.wpd LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION Community Development Department 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Phone (303) 235-2846 (Please print or type all information) ~ b Applicant ;n` t b 0 L 7~ ,t.5 ~t ~ Address 7S~ZS l~Y V Ord v~- Fax 3 1 3 State C-0 Zip 4,o>_tes City \e-1a 303J, \ Address I IDCaI ~3 ~ra G Phone 4 -0t0o Owner Q~etf J State [t ^ zip Z Fax yf+o - City M I l 1~~ Address Phone Contact Zips--- Fax City State (The person listed as contact will be contacted to answer questions regarding this application, provide additional information when necessary, post public hearing signs, and will receive a copy of the staff report prior to Public Hearing.) Location of request (address): I tnrl~h AI, .L.-- t v Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request): Application submittal requirements on reverse side • -Special Use Permit -Change of zone or zone conditions • .Subdivision: Minor (5 lots or less) .Consolidation Plat - -Subdivision: Major (More than 5 lots) -Flood Plain Special Exception • -Right of Way Vacation .Lot Line Adjustment - -Temporary Use, Building, Sign -Planned Building Group - -Variance/Waiver (from Section ) • .Site Development Plan approval -Other: Detailed description of Required information: Assessors Parcel Number: ✓oS I b~ i Size of Lot (acres or square footage): oar ~ Current Zoning: C-1 - - Proposed Zoning: P\ A l e"-'y Proposed Use: A J a 1~`-- Current Use: I - ^ I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge an~th'enpthelc retquested a ctiongannott awfknowledge and consent of those persons isted abve, ully be accomplished. Appl cants otherlthann owoners I am actin with nf-attornev from the owner which approved of this action on his behalf.. r• 'Z. Signature of To be tilled out by staff: Date received 4/ 6-16-5'_ Comp Plan Desig.~ Related Case No.~ ~rthis >~dayof r to 20 DS /i2G//i~LOL otary ublic My commission expires yi9ia s Fee Receipt N Zoning `~'4Pre-App Mtg. Date 'A y L Case No. ~y ~GS -O S Quarter Section Map~~--- Case Case No.: 20505 Quarter Section Map No.: W16 _ App: Last Name: Michael Pharo Related Cases: App: First Name: Michael Pharo & Assoc. Case History: Rezone from A-1 & C-1 to Dev and Outline IPCD Owner: Last Name: Bear Land Holtlm s, LLC 9 Development Plan Owner: First Name: ! pproval, "Medved"... App Address: 635 W. Oxford Ave #6.. Review Body: pC 7/7/05 _ City, State Zip: _Englewootl,.C080110 App: Phone: 037834772 APN: Owner Address: 11001 W. FRN 2nd Review Body: -6/27105 City/State/Zip: heat Ridge, CO 80033 2nd Review Date: Owner Phone: 03-421-0100 Decision-making Body: C-7/25105 Project Address: Approval/Denial Date: /25/2005 _Street Name: I-70 FRN _ City/State, Zip: eat Rltlge, 0060033 Reso/Ordinance No.: 1349 Case Disposition: pproved Conditions of Approval: Employee parking for the Medved Autoplex (all three II parcels) shall be ccommodated on site. District: Project Planner: Reckert File Location: Active Date Received: /25/2005 Notes: _y Pre-App Date: /17/2003_._ Follow-Up: CITI OF WriFAT FTIGF ';'^r{n _,A" F7 RErFTf'T MG=Co "i'F ANOUi4T FIIgD FINTi,!R tiF`F'IT_CA TTOt4 F 2, 17D. 00 7^h{Iii!i Frl I-? loo C FM-_D 70NT'r4G F.'FTMB!'_-- -ENT .](!ile rxj 7G~iTj4f `IM-HUFGFr":F4T FA'04T F'FCFIUFt, rnG_Ih1T _P' _nA,`, _,475.0,0 T ~TGI Cnj Michael G. Pharo Associates, Inc. Notice of Neighborhood Meeting Date of Meeting May 18, 2004 Time of Meeting 6:30 P.M. Location of Meeting Wheat Ridge City Hall Second Floor Glass Conference Room 7500 West 29`h Avenue Medved Colorado is requesting that the City of Wheat Ridge rezone and grant site plan approval for the 9.3 acre property located at 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street. This property is located north of the north I-70 Frontage Road between Oak Street on the east and Parfet Street to the west. The desired action is a rezoning which will combine existing agriculture (Agriculture-One) and commercial (Commercial-One) zones into a Planned Commercial Development zone in conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals will allow for the development of an auto dealership, a warehouse with service center and for the parking, display and storage of automobiles. The City of Wheat Ridge has adopted a requirement that prior to any application for Rezoning of the property, and for Special Use Permits an applicant must notify all residents and property owners within 600 feet and invite them to a Neighborhood Input Meeting. The purpose of this meeting is to allow the applicant to present his proposal to the neighborhood and to give the neighborhood a forum to express their concerns, issues and desires. A Staff Planner will attend the meeting to discuss City policies and regulations and the process involved, however, the Planner will remain impartial regarding viability of the project. Keep in mind that this is not a public hearing. Although a synopsis of the meeting will be entered as testimony, it is the public hearings in front of the Planning Commission and City Council where decisions are rendered. If you want input in the decision-making process, it is imperative that you attend the public hearings. The kinds of concerns residents normally have include the following: • Is the proposal compatible with surrounding land uses and zoning? Are there adequate utilities and services in place or proposed to serve the project? What is the impact on our streets? • How will this proposal affect my property? Where will the storm drainage go? • How will the project be designed to enhance rather than detract from the neighborhood? • What specific changes can be made in the proposal to make it more acceptable to me? 2835 West Oxford Ave., #6 Englewood, Colorado 80110 phone: 303/783-3772 fax: 303/783-377= 2 If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at: (303)235-2846. If you are unable to attend the meeting, you may mail comments or concerns to: City of Wheat Ridge Planning Department 7500 West 29ffi Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 w N nrv 41 OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WHEAT RIDGE COLORADO I DEPARTMENTOF PLANNING AND G PARCEL/LOT BOUNDARY (DESIGNATES OWNERSHIP) WATER FEATURE • DENOTES MULTIPLE ADDRESSES 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN (APPROXIMATE LOCATION) SW 16 MAP ADOPTED: June 15. 1994 r n NW 16 R cn^d~ N'O ox j A-1 DENNI5 s DRAKE PARFET INI PAF PI WZ-7" WZ-9m ARVADA L- w N A-1 WZ-]2-19 € PCD W Z.9P,T , WZ-0, , - A-1 " - CRAIG MIC RgWtTREET PARK - PCD FS&W WZA2-2 i FSGW, YEGCHURELLI 51 INDUSMAL PARK ` W SU13WSION C-2 PID _ WZ-90.2 NW 21 C-1 WZ-92-5 A-1 WMS 70iRONl OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WHEAT RIDGE COLORADO SUB PARCEULOT BOUNDARY (DESIGNATES OWNERSHIP) WATER FEATURE DENOTES MULTIPLE ADDRESSES O 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN (APPROXIMATE LOCATION) SW 16 w DEPARTMENT OF MAP ADOPTED: June 15, 1994 PUNNING AND DEVELOPMENT Last Revi5im: September 10, 2001 * Search Parameters * Jefferson (CO) * 5/4/2004 * 9:42 AM Parcel Number... 38 39 163 00 004 39 163 00 005 39 163 00 006 39 163 00 007 39 163 00 008 39 163 00 015 39 163 00 016 39 163 00 022 39 163 00 023 39 163 01 003 39 163 01 004 39 163 02 001 39 163 02 002 39 164 00 014 39 164 00 015 39 164 01 002 39 164 01 003 39 164 01 004 39 164 02 001 39 164 02 002 39 164 02 003 39 164 02 004 39 164 02 005 39 164 02 006 39 211 03 001 39 211 03 002 39 211 03 003 39 211 03 004 39 211 03 005 39 211 03 006 39 211 99 001 39 212 00 001 39 212 00 002 39 212 00 003 39 212 00 006 39 212 00 007 39 212 00 008 Charles Steismeyer David Hess & Bonita Hoss Alma Alexander 4996 Parfet St 5130 Parfet St 10800 W 48th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Christopher Whiteman & Bonnie Whiteman Christopher Whiteman & Bonnie Whiteman James Karr & Sheryl Karr 4745 Parfet St 4745 P St 60 S Garland St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, 033 Lakewood, CO 80226 Raul Perez & Sylvia Perez Joseph Schneckenburger William Kelsch 4750 Parfet St PO Box 650 3060 S Fulton Ct Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Golden, CO 80402 Denver, CO 80231 R W Gasham John Grundmeier Terry' O'neill & Elizabeth O'neill 720 S Colorado Blvd #7405 10615 W 48th Ave 2265 Zang St Denver, CO 80246 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Golden, CO 80401 Ronald Robitaille & Betty Robitaille William Edwards Metzger Three Limited Liability Co 5110 Parfet St 6983 Dover Way 201 Columbine St 4300 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Arvada, CO 80004 Denver, CO 80206 Vaudis Powell National Advertising Company Arthur & Tammy Thorpe PO Box 415 2502 N Black Canyon Hwy 10625 W 48th Ave Victorville, CA 92393 Phoenix, AZ 85009 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Clyde Losasso & Shirley Losasso John & Sharon Bellegante John Kellow & Kristi Kellow 5120 Parfet St 4760 Parfet St 4740 Parfet St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Frank Wehling City O eat Ridge Jack Kennedy 5006 Parfet St 7500 W 2 A 1084 S Parfet Ct Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ri 80033 Lakewood, CO 80226 Lic Investments Inc Coors Brewing Company Nation Advertise o 4030 Vincennes Rd PO Box 4030 2502 N B yon Hwy Indianapolis, IN 46268 Golden, CO 80401 Phoen' 8 Gordon Eatherton & Debra Eatherton _ Lic nvestments Inc Bear Land Holdings Llc 3411 S Irving St 4030 'nce d 11001 N 170 Service Rd #I70 Englewood, CO 80110 Indiana IN 46268 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Bear d Holdin lc Metzger ee Limited ' ' 'ty Co 11001 I F ge Rd N 201 Columba 0 Whea ge, O 80033 Denve 0206 Mary Cytrynbaum Colorado Industrial Portfolio Lic 4530 S Vorrena 1512 Larimer St #325 Denver, CO Denver, CO 80202 e ge, 80033 Wheat R New World Ventures Lic Hcs vestments L Hcs Investments Llc 5000 Ro A 5000 Ro St #1 Wh ' 80033 5875 N Rogers Ave Chicago, IL 60646 Hcs Investments Lic 5000 Robb St #]A Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 / ~ A Z-, &0 0~ led * ~ Metroscan / Jefferson - j (CO) P rcel - Owner Owner .Steismeyer Char`be~s a Xfered :09/24/1997 Site :4996 Parfet St Wheat Ridge 80033 Mail :4996 Parfet St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$97,700 Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land - Phone Bedrm: l Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1929 Pool: B1dgSF:624 Ac:.41 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) ' - Owner :Hoss David C Parcel :042775 Site :5130 Parfet St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :03/07/2002 Mail :5130 Parfet St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$389,000 Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 5 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1960 Pool: B1dgSF:1,189 Ac:3.48 Metroscan / Jefferson (CO) ' owner :Alexander Alma M Parcel :042823 Site :10800 W 48th Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered Mail :10800 W 48th Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone :303-424-3657 Bedrm: Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1955 Pool: B1dgSF:844 Ac:.70 Metroscan / Jefferson (CO) ' Owner :Whiteman Christopher L Parcel :043569 Site :4745 Parfet St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :07/03/1997 Mail :4745 Parfet St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$220,000 Full Use :4141 Agr,Grazing Land Phone :303-467-2173 Bedrm: 2 Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1924 Pool: B1dgSF:560 Ac:6.16 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) ' Owner :Whiteman Christopher L Parcel :043569 Site :9795 Parfe St t dge 80033 Xfered :07/03/1997 Mail :4745 Parf Ridge Cc 80033 Price :$220,000 Full Use :4141 Agr ng Land Phone :303-467-2173 Bedrm:3. Ba :1.0 TotRm: YB:1924 Pool: B1dgSF:936 Ac: 6.16 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) ' Owner :Karr James A Parcel :043578 Site :5050 Parfet St Wheat Ridge 80033 f-_V . Xfered :07/07/2000 Mail :60 S Garland St Lakewood Co 80226 N - Price :$137,500 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm:-2 Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1964 Pool: B1dg SF:851 Ac:.16 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) ' Owner :Perez Raul E Parcel :043623 Site :4750 Parfet St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :09/11/2001 Mail :4750 Parfet St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone :303-374-9218 Bedrm :4 Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1947 Pool: B1dg SF:2,044 Ac:1.08 : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) ' Owner :Schneckenburger Joseph G Parcel :043624 Site :10705 I 70 Frontage Rd N Wheat Ridge 80033 1K0 Xfered :12/01/2002 Mail , :PO Box 650 Golden Co 80402 l~ Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm :4 Bath:2.00 TotRm: YB:1960 Pool: B1dg SF:1,568 Ac: : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Kelsch William L Parcel :043625 Site :10725 W 48th Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 RD Xfered :11/05/1979 Mail :3060 S Fulton Ct Denver Co 80231 ~ Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm :4 Bath:2.00 TotRm: YB:1960 Pool: B1dg SF:1,568 Ac: : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) ' Owner :Gasham R W Parcel :043627 Site :10601 I 70 Frontage Rd N Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered 0 :06/20/1978 Mail :720 S Colorado Blvd #740S,Denver Co 80246 04- Price :$1,170,000 Use :3112 Ind,Improved Land Phone Bedrm : Bath: TotRm:l YB:1977 Pool: B1dg SF:48,840 Ac:2.32 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Grundmeier John H Parcel :043693 Site :10615 W 48th Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered Mail :10615 W 48th Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm :2 Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1958 Pool: B1dgSF:975 Ac: Information compiled from various sources Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) ' - Owner :0 Neill Terry J Parcel Xfered :043716 :08/17/1992 Site :10675 W 48th Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 p a~ Price 500 :$79 Mail :2265 Zang St Golden Co 80401 , Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:2.00 TotRm: YB:1961 Pool: B1dgS F:1,568 Ac: • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • - Owner :Robitaille Ronald R Parcel :043718 Site :5110 Parfet St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered Mail :5110 Parfet St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price 303-422-2781 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land YB:1946 Pool: Phone BldgS : F:1,241 Ac:.56 Bedrm: 2 Bath:1.00 TotRm: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) ' - Owner :Edwards William S Parcel :043723 Site :10605 W 48th Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :01/31/1976 Mail :6983 Dover Way Arvada Co 80004 9-0 Price :$52,600 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land 1962 Pool: YB Phone B1dgS F:1,576 Ac:.03 Bedrm: : 4 Bath:2.00 TotRm: : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Metzger Three Limited Liability Co Parcel :043765 Site :4990 Parfet St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :05/31/1996 Mail :201 Columbine St #300 Denver Co 80206 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land YB:1927 Pool: Phone B1dgS F:1,017 Ac:2.58 Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.00 TotRm: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • - Owner :Powell Vaudis M Parcel :043769 Site :11221 I 70 Frontage Rd S Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :08/24/1994 Mail :PO Box 415 Victorville Ca 92393 N`1,0 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1929 Pool: B1dgSF:624 Ac:1.91 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) ' - ~-f Owner :National Advertising Company Parcel Xfered :043805 :11/06/1973 Site :4800 Parfet St Wheat Ridge 80033 Mail :2502 N Black Canyon Hwy Phoenix Az 85009 Price :$6,800 Use :2111 Vacant,Commercial Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: BldgSF: Ac:.43 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) ' - Owner :Thorpe Arthur L/Tammy L Parcel :043832 Site :10625 W 48th Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :11/25/2003 Mail :10625 W 48th Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone :713-880-9947 Bedrm :2 Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1957 Pool: B1dgSF:975 Ac: Metroscan / Jefferson (CO) • - Owner :Lo Sasso Clyde G Parcel :043835 Site :5120 Parfet St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :08/30/1993 Mail :5120 Parfet St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$110,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm :4 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1956 Pool: B1dgSF:1,254 Ac:.63 : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) ' Owner :Bellegante John/Sharon Parcel :043850 Site :4760 Parfet St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :02/02/2004 Mail :4760 Parfet St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :5178 Misc,Residential,Mixed Use Land Phone Bedrm : Bath: TotRm:l YB:1941 Pool: B1dgSF:1,816 Ac:.92 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) ' Owner :Kellow John K Parcel :043871 Site :4740 Parfet St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :12/24/1986 Mail :4740 Parfet St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$66,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm : Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1948 Pool: B1dgSF:2,794 Ac:.71 . MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Wehling Frank W Parcel :043918 Site :5006 Parfet St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :02/26/2003 Mail :5006 Parfet St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :4141 Agr,Grazing Land Bedrm:3 Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1942 Pool Phone : B1dg SF:1,500 Ac:1.86 lnformaiton compiledfram various sources. Real Estaie Solutions makes no representations or warranties as io the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. • MetroSCan./ Jefferson (CO) ' 052458 Owner :City Of Wheat Ridge Parcel : red :03/24/1999 Xf Site :10625 170 Frontage Wheat Ridge 80033 e Mail :7500 W 29th Ave eat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :3112 Ind,Im ved Land TotRm:1 YB:1972 Pool: Phone B1dgSF:38,685 Ac:2.86 Bedrm: B,at : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Kennedy Jack T Parcel :074459 Site :10645 I 70 Frontage Rd N Wheat Ridge 80033 aQ Xfered :01/12/2000 Mail :1084 S Parfet Ct Lakewood Co 80226 Price :$178,000 Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:2.00 TotRm: YB:1961 Pool: B1dgSF:1,568 Ac: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) ' Owner :Lic Investments Inc Parcel :085141 Site :5000 Oak St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :06/23/1986 Mail :4030 Vincennes Rd Indianapolis In 46268 Price Use :3112 Ind,Improved Land tRm:4 YB:1970 Pool: T Phone B1dgSF:157,936 Ac:8.85 Bedrm: o Bath: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • owner :Coors Brewing Company Parcel :136211 Site :10619 W 50th Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :12/31/1990 Mail :PO Box 4030 Golden Co 80401 Price Phone Use : :3112 Ind,Improved Land \ th: TotRm:13 YB:1968 Pool: B B1dgSF:442,406 Ac:27.05 Bedrm a MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :National Advertising o Parcel :136632 Site :*no Site Add ss Xfered :04/04/1977 Mail :2502 N Black Hwy Phoenix Az 85009 Price :$7,300 Use :1111 Vacant, i l tial Phone 81 A Bedrm: Bath: YB: Pool: otRm: c:. B1dgSF: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) ' Owner :Eatherton Gordon W Parcel :148361 Site :5158 Parfet St Wheat Ridge 80033 ~p Xfered :10/04/1999 Mail :3411 S Irving St Englewood Co 80110 0J Price Use :3112 Ind,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm:2 YB:1982 Pool: B1dgSF:37,500 Ac:2.47 : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Lic Investments Inc Parcel :176621 Xfered :10/17/1986 Site :5000 Oak St Wheat 1 80033 Mail :4030 Vincen s dianapolis In 46268 Price Use :3111 Vacant s rial Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF: Ac:.98 . MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Bear Land Holdings Llc Parcel :193121 Site :11001 N I 70 Service Rd #I70 Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :07/01/1997 Mail :11001 N I 70 Service Rd #I70 Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :2112 Com,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm:l YB:1987 Pool: B1dgSF:58,202 Ac:8.86 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Bear Land Holdings Llc e 80033 t Rid Rd Parcel :193122 Xfered :09/23/1998 Site g a :11051 I 70 Fron age Mail :11001 I 70 Fro g Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use Bedrm :2112 Com,Impr a : Bath: Tot :1 YB:1999 Pool: Phone B1dgSF:46,871 Ac:8.71 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) I• Owner :Metzger Three Limited Liab' ity Co Parcel :193681 Site :*no Site Addres * Xfered :03/01/1996 Mail :201 Columbine S 30 nver Co 80206 Price Use :1155 Vacant, Re al Pool: YB Phone B1dgSF: Ac:8.12 Bedrm : : Bath: Tot MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :New World Ventures Llc - Parcel :401510 Site :4950 Oak St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :03/12/2004 Mail :5875 N Rogers Ave Chicago I1 60646 Price Use :3112 Ind,Improved Land Phone Bedrm : Bath:. TotRm:l YB:1984 Pool: B1dgSF:34,476 Ac:2.15 informalion compiled from various so ces. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) r M : Parcel :401511-l Owner Site y a :Cytrynbaum 'p :4980 Oak St Wheat Ridge 80033 _7 Xfered :07/12/ 989 Mail N :4530 S Vorrena Denver Co Price :$1,000 Use :3112 Ind,Improved Land tRm:l YB:1983 Pool: T Phone B1dgSF :20,304 Ac:1.23 Bedrm: o Bath: : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Colorado Industrial Portfolio Llc Parcel :401512 Site :10790 W 50th Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 p Xfered :12/03/1998 ll 133 F 7 Mail :1512 Larimer St #325 Denver Co 80202 hI 1v Price u , :$37 Use :3112 Ind,Improved Land YB:1985 Pool: Phone B1dgSF 2.25 :35,870 Ac Bedrm: Bath: TotRm:l : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) . * Parcel :401513 Owner it :Hcs Investments Llc 5000 Oak St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :12/23/2002 e S Mail : :5000 Robb St #lA Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$350,000 Use :3111 Vacant,Industrial Pool: B Phone B1dgSF 1.01 : Ac Bedrm: : Bath: TotRm: Y : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) * Owner :Hcs Investments Llc Parcel Xfered :401514 :12/23/2002 Site :5000 Oak St heat Ri e 8 3 Mail :5000 Robb S 1 t Ridge Co 80033 Price :$350,000 Use :3111 Vacan us rial Pool: YB Phone B1dgSF: Ac:1.53 Bedrm: * : Bath: otRm: • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Hcs Investments Llc Parcel :401515 Site :5000 Oak St heat i e 80033 Xfered :12/23/2002 Mail :5000 Robb ge Co 80033 Price :$350,000 Use :3111 Vac trial ol: P Phone B1dgSF: Ac:.85 Bedrm: o Bat TOtRm: YB: Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Property appraisal system Sch:401511 Parcel ID:39-164-02-004 Status:Active Property Type:Industriaq OAK ST IF WHEAT RIDGE CO 800331 I~Mailing Address: 100274 MONROE ST II ~1 DENVER CO 80206 5506 STREET Name: 428810 Date Claim Dee antv Deed Location Man/Additional Information Send mail to assessorCalcojefferson co.us with questions or comments about this Website. Copyright ® 2003, Jefferson County, Colorado. All rights reserved. A Map of How to Get to Our Office Website inforrnation current through: 05-01-2004 http://wwl4.co.jefferson.co.uslats/displaygeneral-do?sch=401511 Page 1 of 1 5/4/2004 Horne General Property Reoords Information Property appraisal system 458 Parcel ID:39-164-00-015 Status:Active Address 106251-70 FRONTAGE RD WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 Address: 11445 I-70 FRONTAGE RD WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 212E er Name OAK LP. 16 Date 17- 24756 IFO8-17-199211 301,800liWarrantyDeed JjW103182 ~1 Location Map/Additional Information Send mail to a ssessoKriko.ieffers n.w.us with questions or comments about this Website. Copyright @2003, Jefferson County, Colorado. All rights reserved. A Map of How to Get to Our Office Websim information current through: 05-01-2004 http://wwl4.co.jefferson.co.us/ats/displaygeneral.do?sch=052458 Page 1 of 1 5/4/2004 Htme Gencrs►1 Property Records Informntion _ Property appraisal system Sch:085141 Parcel ID:39-164-01-003 Status:Active Property Type:Industrl~ 00 OAK ST ]EAT RIDGE CO BOX 1149 SUN TX 78767 Narne Name: 164800 Location Map/Additional Information Send mail to assmo iefferson co us with questions or comments about this Websim. Copyright @ 2003, Jefferson County, Colorado. All rights reserved. A Man of How to Get to Our Office Website information current through: 05-01-2004 http://wwl4.co.jefferson.co.us/ats/displaygeneral.do?sch=085141 Page 1 of 1 5/4/2004 Horde General SAM. M Property Records Information _ CT ESCROW SERVICES, LLC Date: April 27, 2004 Our File Number: CO13050 C6 Re: Metzger Three Limited Liability Company Commercial Escrow Officer. Linda Hull- Ihull(a).chancerytitle.com - 303.375.4949 Title Officer Jef Stanton - Lstantonachancerytitle.corn - 303.550.9413 Delivery List Purchaser: Medved Chevrolet 11001 W. 1-70 Frontage Rd. North Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Attn: Mr. John Medved i m edved (a)med ved. co m Attn: Diana Blanch d bla nch (cil medved. com Purchaer's Counsel: Lottner, Rubin, Fishman, Brown & Saul, PC 633 17" Street, Suite 2700 Denver, CO 80202-3635 Phone: 303.292.1200 Fax: 303.292.1300 Attn: Marshall Fishman m fi s h m a n (ab I rfl e g a I. c o m Attn: Tiffani Thiret tthiret Irtleoal.com Surveyor: Aspen Surveying 2993 S. Peoria, Suite 150 Aurora, CO 80014 Attn: Sajwn Patterson - shawnna, as pens u rveyin g.co m Ph: 303.750.4590 Seller's Counsel: Sullivan Hayes Brokerage Corp. 201 Columbine St., #300 Denver, CO 80206 Phone: 303-534-0900 Fax: 303-831-1333 Attn: Carolyn Gruber Abrahams, Esq. cabra ha ms(a) sul I iva n haves. com Lender: Bank One Attn: Renee Shivers Phone: 602.221.6381 Fax: 602.221.6374 Renee M Shivers(cDbankone.com Attn: Sylvia D'Angelo svlvia d'angelo(obankone.com Attached please find: Revised Title Commitment This revision includes the following changes: See endorsements 3950 Lewiston Street ♦ Suite 100 ♦ Aurora, Colorado 80011-1556 303-373-5500 ♦ Fax: 303-373-5548 J TICOR TITLE INSURANCE Commitment for Title Insurance American Land Title Association Commitment - 1966 TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation, herein called the Company, for a valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the provisions of Schedule A and B and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof Issued by: CHANCERY TITLE COMPANY, LLC 3950 NORTH LEWISTON STREET SUITE I0o AURORA, CO 80011 (303) 373-5500 FAX (303) 373-5548 by the Company, either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate 180 days after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. This Commitment shall not be valid or binding until countersigned below by an authorized signatory of the Company. TICOR TITLE INSURANC OMPANY By President Attest Secretary JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJIJJJJJJJJJJJJ~J ALTA COMMITMENT - 1966 Reorder Form No. 1396 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A Commitment Number 0000013050 C6 PROPERTY ADDRESS: vacantland SCHEDULE #s: 043765, 193681 L. Effective date: April 7, 2004 at 7:30 a.m. 2. Policy or policies to be issued: A. ALTA 1992 Owner's Policy- Proposed Insured: Bear Land Holdings, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company B. ALTA 1992 Loan Policy - Proposed Insured: Bank One, NA, its successors and/or assigns C. None - Proposed Insured: Deletion of 14 (Commercial) Form 103.1 - Easement (Item 16-a) (Loan Policy) Form 116.1 - Survey (Owners Policy) Form 116.4 - Contiguity (Owner's Policy) TOTAL S 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 959.00 $ 959.00 $ $ 4,634.00 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this commitment and covered herein is fee simple and title thereto is at the effective date hereof vested in: Metzger Three Limited Liabililty Company, a Colorado limited liability company (subject to requirements) 4. The land referred to in this commitment is described as follows: See Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Amount Premium $2,500,000.00 $ 2,396.00 $2,500,000.00 $ 120.00 $ S Issued by: Chancery Title Company, LLC As Agent for: Ticor Tide Insurance Company Commitment Number 0000013050 C6 Exhibit A - Legal Description Parcel A: A tract of land being a portion of the Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 16, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast comer of the Southwest quarter of Section 16; thence North 00°01' 12" East along the East line of the Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 16, 448.01 feet to a point on the Southerly boundary line of the Denver and Northwestern Railroad Company Right-of-Way as recorded in Book 126 at Page 583 in The Clerk and Recorder's Office of Jefferson County, said point being the Point of Beginning; thence South 74007'34" West along said Right-of-Way, 549.56 feet to a point on the Easterly right-of-way of Parfet Street as recorded in Book 155 at Page 424 in the Clerk and Recorder's Office of Jefferson County; thence North 00°04'24" West along said Easterly Right-of-Way 96.86 feet to a point on the Northerly boundary line of said Denver and Northwestern Railroad Company Right-of-Way; thence continuing along said Easterly Right-of-Way of Parfet Street North 00°06'56" West, 633.78 feet to a point being 247.50 feet Southerly of the North line of the Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 16; thence North 89043'46" East, parallel with and 247.50 feet distant when measured at right angles to said North line 530.21 feet to a point on the East line of the Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 16; thence South 00°O1' 12" West along said East line 582.83 feet to the Point of Beginning, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado. Parcel B That part of the Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 16, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of said Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter; thence West, along the North line of said Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter, 528 feet, more or less, to the East line of Parfet Street; thence South, along the East line of Parfet Street, 247.5 feet; thence East, parallel with the North line of said Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter, 528 feet, more or less, to the East line of said Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter; thence North, along said East line, 247.5 feet, more or less, to the Point of Beginning, Excepting therefrom that portion described in Book 1329 at Page 127 of the Jefferson County Records County of Jefferson, State-of Colorado. Issued by: Chancery Title Company, LLC Commitment Number 0000013050 C6 SCHEDULE B-1 Requirements The following are to be complied with: A. Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. B. Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record, to-wit: Correction Deed from Andrew Leslie Metzger to Metzger Three Limited Liability Company, a Colorado limited liability company. NOTE: This requirement is necessary because the Grantor in Deed recorded May 31, 1996 at Reception Number F0243504, appeared as A. L. Metzger whereas title was conveyed to said Grantor as Andrew Leslie Metzger. ii. Warranty Deed satisfactory to the Company, from Metzger Three Limited Liabililty Company, a Colorado limited liability company, vesting fee simple title in and to Bear Land Holdings, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company. iii. Deed of Trust satisfactory to the Company, from Bear Land Holdings, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, to the Public Trustee of Jefferson County, for the benefit of Bank One. C. Intentionally deleted - 4/22/04 JS. D. Intentionally deleted - 4/22/0415. E Receipt by the Company of a satisfactory Final Affidavit, executed by Bear Land Holdings, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company. F. Receipt by the Comp any of a satisfactory Final Affidavit, executed by Metzger Three Limited Liabililty Company, a Colorado limited liability company. G. Payment of all taxes and assessments now due and payable. H. Intentionally deleted-4/21/0415. Issued by: Chancery Title Company, LLC Commitment Number CO00013050 C6 SCHEDULE B-2 Exceptions The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortages in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Taxes and assessments which are a lien or are now due and payable; any tax, special assessment, charge or lien imposed for or by any special taxing district or for water or sewer service; any unredeemed tax sales. 7. Water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not shown by the public records. 8. An easement for electric transmission lines and incidental purposes as set forth in an instrument recorded December 14, 1923 in Book 259 at Page 92. 9. An easement for electric transmission lines and incidental purposes as set forth in an instrument recorded October 31, 1925 in Book 275 at Page 511. 10. The effect of the inclusion of the subject property in the Valley Water District, as disclosed by an instrument recorded October 29, 1956 in Book 1026 at Page 592. 11. Easement and right of way for the Bayou Ditch (Slough Ditch) as evidenced by an instrument recorded December 27, 1983 at Reception Number 83122328. 12. An casement for utilities and incidental purposes granted to Public Service Company of Colorado by an instrument recorded October 28, 1986 at Reception Number 86132217, upon the terms and conditions set forth in the instrument. 13. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, easements and agreements as set forth in License Agreement and Grant, Conveyance and Confirmation of Right-of-Way recorded December 12, 1986 at Reception Number 86154223. 14. Lease by and between Metzger Three Limited Liability Company, as Landlord, and Bear Land Company, LLC, as Tenant, as evidenced by Memorandum of Lease recorded April 2, 2001 at Reception Number F1210056, upon the terms and conditions therein set forth. 15. Existing leases or tenancies. 16. The following matters as set forth on ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey dated March 11, 2004, prepared by Aspen Surveying, Inc., as Job No. 2004-0033: a) Utility tower and overhead utility lines in the Southerly portion of said land, which do not lie within a recorded easement, and a prescriptive easement therefor. b) Any loss or damage as a result of the fence lines being inconsistent with the property lines. Issued by: Chancery Title Company, LLC SCHEDULE B-2 - Continued Commitment Number 0000013050 C6 c) Rights of way for existing ditches and canals traversing said land. NOTE: Upon receipt of a satisfactory survey and final affidavits, as shown in Schedule B - Section t, Exceptions I through 4 will be deleted. NOTE: Provided CT Escrow Services conducts the closing of this transaction, Exception 5 will be deleted. NOTE: Upon payment of all taxes and assessments now due and payable, as shown in Schedule B - Section 1, Exception 6 will be amended to read as follows: "Taxes and assessments for the year 2004 and subsequent years, a lien, not yet due or payable." Issued by: Chancery Title Company, LLC Commitment Number 0000013050 C6 DISCLOSURE ATTACHMENT Pursuant to C.R.S. 30-I0406(3)(a) all documents received for recording or filing in the Clerk and Recorders office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin of at least one-half of an inch. The Clerk and Recorder will refuse to record or file any document that does not conform to the requirements of this section. Pursuant to C.R.S. 39-22-604.5, if this transaction includes a sale of the property and the sales price exceeds $100,000.00, the seller must comply with the disclosure/withholding requirements of said section. (Nonresident withholding) Pursuant to C.R.S. 10-I1-122, the company will not issue its policy or policies of title insurance contemplated by this commitment until it has been provided a Certificate of Taxes due or other equivalent documentation from the County Treasurer or the County Treasurer's authorized agent; or until the Proposed Insured has notified or instructed the company in writing to the contrary. Pursuant to C.R.S. 10-11- 122 notice is hereby given that: The subject property may be located in a special taxing district. A Certificate of Taxes due listing each taxing jurisdiction shall be obtained from the County Treasurer or the County Treasurer's authorized agent. Information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. Pursuant to C.R.S. 38-35-125(2) no person or entity that provides closing and settlement services for a real estate transaction shall disburse funds as a part of such services until those funds have been received and are available for immediate withdrawal as a matter of right. Pursuant to C.R.S. 10-11-122, notice is hereby given that: (a) "Gap Protection" - When this Company conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or filing the legal documents resulting from the transaction, the Company shall be responsible for all matters which appear on the record prior to such time of recording or filing; and (b) "Mechanic's Lien Protection" - If you are the buyer of a single family residence, you may request mechanic's lien coverage to be issued on your policy of insurance. If the property being purchased has not been the subject of construction, improvements or repairs in the last six months prior to the date of this commitment, the requirements will be payment of the appropriate premium and the completion of an Affidavit and Indemnity by the seller. If the property being purchased was constructed, improved or repaired within six months prior to the date of this commitment, the requirements may involve disclosure of certain financial information, payment of premiums, and indemnity, among others. The general requirements stated above are subject to revision and approval by the Company. Pursuant to C.R.S. 10-11-123, the Company hereby notifies the proposed buyer in the current transaction that there is recorded evidence that the mineral estate, or a portion thereof, has been severed, leased, or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate. There is a substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in the oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the subject property. Such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner's permission. CT ESCROW SERVICES WIRING INSTRUCTIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS: Wire Funds To: Wells Fargo Bank West, N.A. 1740 Broadway Denver, CO 80274 Phone: (303) 863-5035 ABA 102000076 For final credit of.. CT Escrow Services, LLC, Trust Account Account No.: 200-0242970 Please reference: Commitment Number Principal's Name Property Address Issued by: Chancery Title Company, LLC CHANCERY TITLE COMPANY, LLC C T ESCROW SERVICES, LLC Privacy Policy Notice PURPOSE OF THIS NOTICE Title V of the Gramm-Lcach-Bliley Act (GLBA) generally prohibits any financial institution, directly or through its affiliates, from sharing nonpublic personal information about you with a nonaffiliated third party unless the institution provides you with a notice of its privacy policies and practices, such as the type of information that it collects about you and the categories of persons or entities to whom it may be disclosed. In compliance with the GLBA, we are providing you with this document, which notifies you of the privacy policies and practices of CHANCERY TITLE COMPANY, LLC and C T ESCROW SERVICES, LLC. We may collect nonpublic personal information about you from the following sources: Information we receive from you, such as on applications or other form. Information about your transactions we secure from our files, or from our affiliates or others. Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency. Information that we receive from others involved in your transaction, such as the real estate agent or lender. Unless it is specifically stated otherwise in an amended Privacy Policy Notice, no additional nonpublic personal information will be collected about you. We may disclose any of the above information that we collect about our customers or former customers to our affiliates or to nonaffiliated third parties as permitted by law. We also may disclose this information about our customers or former customers to the following types of nonaffiliated companies that perform marketing services on our behalf or with whom we havejoint marketing agreements: • Financial service providers such as companies engaged in banking, consumer finance, securities and insurance. • Non-financial companies such as envelope staffers and other fulfillment service providers. WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY NONPUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED BY LAW. We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those employees who need to know that information in order to provide products or services to you. We maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information. Conditions and Stipulations t. The term "mortgage," when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affect- ing the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to Paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. _ 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions, the Exclusions from Coverage and the Conditions and Stipulations of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ.r~rJJJJJJJ~IJJJJJJJJJJ CT Escrow Services, LLC 3950 Lewiston Street suite 100 Aurora, CQ 80011 (303) 373-5500 COMBINED CLOSING STATEMENT ESTIMATED Seller: Metzger Three Limited Liabililty Company Escrow No: 00013050-001-LRH Close Date. 04262004 Proration Date: 04262004 Date Prepared: 04222004 Buyer: Bear Land Holdings Property Address: vacant land ,CO u Ile bits:., 7 iSS'I4~o y-Sele cdi .,.,1..ryC5..„,SS.rS iF~v„ut p ~o -::xv •e:;.. ...1~~9..fd.O.AJ.4.,::~.. „.Nr a a4tr'riN.Y ~.~„<b1C y~S, 'ri ~ u eCC}edlFt. .;:4„a;,,e,., CONSIDERATION: 2,500,000.00 Total Consideration 2,500,000.00 NEW AND EXISTING ENCUMBRANCES: New First Loan from Bank One 2,500,000.00 PRORATIONS AND ADJUSTMENTS: 3.472.22 Rents 3,472.22 ADDITIONAL CHARGES: 1,000.00 Legal Fees to TITLE CHARGES: Title Insurance Fees to 2,396.00 Chancery Title Company, LLC Lender's to Chancery 120.00 Title Company, LLC Deletion of 14 to 100.00 Chancery Tire Company, LLC RECORDING FEES: Recording Fee to CT 21.00 Escrow Services, LLC Deed: 4 pages @ $21.00 State Tax(Stamps to CT 250.00 Escrow Services, LLC State Deed: $250.00 11.00 record correction deed to ESCROW CHARGES: 350.00 Escrow Fee to CT Escrow 350.00 Services, LLC Tax Certificate to CT 30.00 Escrow Services, LLC 4,833.22 2,500,000.00 Sub Totals 2,503,267.00 2,503,472.22 Refund Due Suver 205.22 2,495,166.78 Proceeds Due Seller 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 Totals 2,503,472.22 2,503,472.22 Metzger Three Limited Liabililty Company Bear Land Holdings, LLC By: James M. Sullivan, Manager By: John F. Medved, Manager Page 1 of 2 When Recorded, Return To: Marshall H. Fishman Lottner Rubin Fishman Brown & Saul, P.C. 633 17`h Street, Suite 2700 Denver, Colorado 80202 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED THIS DEED, made as of this day of April, 2004, between METZGER THREE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, a Colorado limited liability company ("Grantor"), and BEAR LANDHOLDINGS, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, whose address is 11001 West I-70 Frontage Road North, Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 ("Grantee"). WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Two Million Five Hundred Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($2,500,000.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm unto the Grantee, its successors and assigns forever, all the real property, together with all improvements, buildings, structures and fixtures, if any, situate, lying and being in the County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); TOGETHER with (i) all easements and rights-of-way appurtenant to the Property; (ii) all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof from and after the date hereof; and (iii) all the estate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the Grantor, either in law or equity, of, in and to the Property, with the hereditaments and appurtenances; SUBJECT TO the easements and rights-of-way of record (collectively, the "Permitted Exceptions"). TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said Property above bargained and described, with the appurtenances, unto the Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. The Grantor, for itself, its successors and assigns, does covenant and agree that it shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the Property in the quiet and peaceable possession of the Grantee, its successors and assigns, against all and every person or persons claiming the whole or any part thereof, by, through or under the Grantor, subject, however, to the Permitted Exceptions. 113401.195.4/21/2004 09:49AM.TTH1.A0151703.D0C;1) I IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has executed this deed on the date set forth above. GRANTOR: METZGER THREE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, a Colorado limited liability company By: James M. Sullivan, Manager STATE OF COUNTY OF ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of April, 2004, by James M. Sullivan as Manager of METZGER THREE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, a Colorado limited liability company. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public (13401.195.4/21/2004 09A9AM.TTH1.A0151703.D0C;1} 2 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Pored A A tract of land being a portion of the Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 10, Township 3 South, Range 69 West orthe Sixth Principal Nleridian. County of Jefferson, Slate of Colorado, being mote particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of the Southwest quarter of Section 16; thence North 00°01'12' East along the East line of the Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 16, 448.01 feet to a pointon the Southerly boundary tine of the Denver and Northweswri Railroad Company Right-of-Way as recorded in Book 126 at Page 583 in The Clerk and Recorder's Office of Jefferson County, said point being the Point of Beginning; thence South 74007'34" West along said Right-of-Way, 549.56 feet roll point on :he Easterly right-of-way of Parfet Siteet as recorded in Book 155 at Pago 424 in the Clerk and B=order's Office of 1e Rirson County; thence North 00°04'24" West along said Easterly Right-of-Way 96.86 feet to a point on the Northerly boundary tine of said Denier and Noahwcs:ern Railroad Company Right- 0; thence continuing along said Easterly Righio`Way of Parfet Street North 00006'56" West, 633.78 feet to a point being 247.50 feet Southerly of the North tine of the Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 16; thence North 89°43'46" East, parallel with and 247.50 feet distant when measured at right angles to said North line 530.21 feet to a point on the East line of the Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 16; thence South 00°0112" West along said East line 582.83 feet to the Point of Beginning, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado. Parcel B That part of the Southcast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 16, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at ;he Northeast corner of said Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter, thence West, along the North line of said Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter, 528 feet, more or less, to the East line of Padct Sweet; thence South, along the East line of Parfet Street, 247.5 feet; thence East, parallel with the North line of said Southeast quarter of the Southwest qua ner, 528 feet, more or less, to the East line of said Southeast quaner of the Southwest quarter; thence North, along said East. line, 2:7.5 feet, mart or Ices, to ll:e Pmot of Beginning, Excepting therefrom that portion described in Book 1329 at Page 127 ofdac Jcfferso-n County Records. County oficMrsoo, State of Coli:ado. 113401.195.42112004 09:49AM.TCHI.A0151703.D0C;Ij A-1 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 303/ 235-2846 Fax: 303/235-2857 The City of Wheat Ridge October 20. 2003 David Ward Facilities Manager Medved Colorado 11001 W. I-70 Frontage Road North Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Dear Mr. Ward: Please consider this letter a response to our conversation of last week. The Community Development Department has preliminarily reviewed the plans submitted for the Hummer dealership proposed at the northeast comer of Parfet Street and I-70 Frontage Road North, addressed as 4950 and 4990 Parfet Street. The plan set that was submitted shows a structure with an architectural design replicating a "Quonset" but as it includes a curved roof /wall system constructed of steel siding. Pursuant to Section 2.3.7.5. of the Streetscape and Architectural Design Manual, pre-fabricated industrial metal siding is not an acceptable architectural construction material. Staff therefore, concludes that the proposed building does not meet the architectural standards for the City of Wheat Ridge. Copies of the Streetscape and Architectural Design Manual are available in our office for purchase or inspection. If you have questions, or need further clarification, do not hesitate to contact me at 303-235-2848. Sincerely, Meredith Reckert, AICP Senior Planner C: Dennis Polk Colorado Secretary of State Entity Type: CORPORATION Filing Date: 08/02/2002 Status: GOOD State of CO Incorporation: Term: PERPETUAL Inactive Date: N/A Last Report: Report not filed Last Report Filing ID: none Name Reservation N/A Expires: Registered Agent Name: FISHMAN MARSHALL H Physical Address: 633 SEVENTEENTH ST STE 2700 DENVER Colorado PO Box: None 80202 Page 1 of 2 http://www.sos.state.co.us/cgi-forte/fortecgi/frte_corporationprodaccessl7261 CI F221 F0717... 1/6/2003 Colorado Secretary of State Page 2 of 2 Principal Address: 11001 W I-70 FRONTAGE RD NORHT WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 United States Secondary Address: J View History and Documents. Elections I Business j Information I Bingo License I Contact Us I Homc http://www.sos.state.co.us/egi-forte/fortecgi/frte_corporationprodaccessl7261 C 1F221 F0717... 1/6/2003 Jefferson County Assessor System Colorado - - General information Assessor Printer Friendly Page Assessor Home TeTfcoTf-ome New eS arch 100 Jefferson County Pkwy Golden, Colorado 80419 303.271.8600 Page 1 of 1 Sch:978220 Parcel ID: Active:Active Property Type:Commercial Property Address: 11001 W I-70 FRONTAGE RD WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 Mailing Address: P.O. BOX 9024 DETROIT MI 48202 9024 Owner Name: MC482-C15-C46 GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION Neighborhood:N/A Area:N/A Sale Date Sale Amount Deed Type Reception No Sales Records Disclaimer: This information is prepared as an ongoing commitment to the public to provide accurate, tp and up-to-date information to the public. This is an informational service and will be maintained during normal business hours, 8 a.m p.m., Mondays through Fridays. If any service interruption in service occurs during non-bus hours, the problem will be addressed at the beginning of the next business day. Jefferson County makes every effort to produce and publish the most current and accurate p: information possible. Jefferson County assumes no liability whatsoever associated with the 1 misuse of this public data. Send mail to assessor&o.jeffersoaco.us with questions or comments about this Web Site. Copyright 0 2000, Jefferson County, Colorado. All rights reserved. Last modified: May 01, 2001 http://ww4. co.j efferson.co.uslappslservletlats.atsdisplay?search=6&sch=978220&ptype=4&... 1/6/2003 0 t v 0 CA tr 4 0. F J a S 'E- -4= z, 0 a e~ a 0 0 z s 2 k 4 L N i v s o ~ d z In ~ N a -a d L l 1 Q t 4 ~ , N o ~ • y - ; "1 V{ 1 ~ qe,, ~ M tl t' b Co y, G V1 ' O U ~ ~ ~ o s o ~ 0 3 . a- r U e 1 l' y ~ 'T u tom It 5A~- hwa, 0~ S/i5. 0 co-1 . W~• 3 -11is j5 the AeLO Boar. ✓eSf (Af -P-, a ~~re n-~ rc~uca~r~ ~v ~ 7 G o ~ `F~ r F V1 V1 A V vI1 o~ 0 N N U m ~A Effi$a U,2lam 1mffi~ C°p~'W ffia°i o~"°~.Y'GyRg~y 3~a~oa w -E Ca Tc p t6 'am -.q mm E C: mr +°-+mas, ro- 6 too 02 m•B~Y m m mO mm o E R ma°+ a y a.°. u x'.yy tl~•' a a. aZ i u.v~.mF, a`"me'~3E .,w.:a~-`a mdo4gaa8m 3~aW9~aamQ~ d•ffia;~Q"•~,'o`~'Emk°r.°4.'0>'mo~oANEm~w°gii ~F~m~Jm .4TFam >06^~~m• Boo •`o"-~ ar~'m°w3a,F$ t°CPe'8~~. r°sm~Ece`Bc°>{.~omawmU>A°•°ms _°r`°F$ B o y 0m l e a W ~ as tlm 3. e d~° m y~ a e tlm C e ~ ffi Q ~ W e mCa•p~"aw 6m6 ~Q,''O>RU°i C~ O •pw'S~ B 'C a..^p~YT °m'~'' °aB'~°iffi99''Om `~3av~'~3ac-~d~h0•~fW"~°'~.~ .aRmi.~moFit3~" °v~G.1om 6°~'mama om U`m .3 ,~6.. Qoa~~C) .amtffo.`m. ono ''et ~v tl m'S m~ E~ ~ ua B. ~ ~ mLz fia, :a m3'8 » u m° o~~aR' viB-". S'obboe> `O QaQ 4W. 'O~ dCd+yy wp°. wmTgm mge~i `^~.~q 13 !Z-ot~mw~ o G~'~Cam+a~rma~hA ypdai ,aF mm.rfa:3 m$'w :2 aa~~ F3 was N a aa~$3 0~ Be;o-o e.5 a -'s stir= ° > R.r $Ap >p~~rF~jm O3 E> 0.9d EY'm~m Rs`~gwRE EG".c 00 Olilifi 4 v K ~3 $ aT ~'S `m d qII YoY .F3~O a a^_ o o y s~°~ m a.M TO"' pm I- I~ Dppp7p uu mm p 'a7Na w W~q,a w dL°OO ~Y7wiOC ma0 d W m'O y°9 U Br of 0. -0 woEammaoe~-°eam°~$~??eww4a•1u 9~v~wCEy~~w~~° my @mRrai ~O~"p Q W FrE- pmTW iyOE,~, .~.YmP*i _o 070 4M= gg V m A 32.°J 4m -1t -5 m mw+ 0: A.., m m m. t5 o •.mpw ~,,,y ya76•' Emaffi mmabp 64 mm5'° ag R ~-fi •~ez~ea5 •°-.moi~yy~~ E~a. C _C m tl m T fj r~ s a~ o m Y m q ug ag .a C~ ~„a,~ p, m 8 ~o"me m~T m°O>3 ~~,°•v sm.e,m, o.~o`-ti~am ~qar ~'g"maffia.$~mo~ ~ ~r~- a ~mBm°~yW« =4=-0 m4a C•~°R mo`+m.°o_$~ 'g Via. '^u .@ a. ma m acv o °O>.U 39* o m a y ffi m a..~ ffi•' m ,°S R w`m 7~a-mayvEu~...eZ o.om 3~y~momio 't sld-gams°2;;M' ~`ufa E$a,°~~^'L ~^c ~.6s~O ffim,mtly°,°, -a$mc°°~~°~•.p•~ 9 °m^m^ o.,Exo°m'~,.°a GSa~j~,°d1eawa`~ F; O`°...gyE x~Fsaama-+'~u•oAm,a.o°m~g~~W~+N~ EA Alt i rR $,~a .ffi•~o'N'..u. •~'~'`o EA r~~ .°R-`d °°r~c°•~m op_l~ ut. cv Ad A H wo S~E°m~ xSw_ .583;[-.ac Eao3E 3 4uy m a Waff -asa'3~~'~~$E~'~.~m. coi o.P as •m O S S F e mmo e6z - Ng o41 -9 mgm.'m y aX'r7 ffi.o Wt Cid ~cm $m~°e m m a~ o Z a m-6 aapd m -m ~L E~=mm " m w Taos m'$ oa+u O c~p >'a0 g ~ vy~ S«a3 ~~m 2m v Z9 > m q A O _ m-~ e.r of s.~7 m 6~i r.O fi B m a O -°a a~ag° pmtAmFgGmg 'S miN`.Bm°P+~w tl6 Cy, ~v is J Mm00 Tm30C~O ytlaUWmmW-:'iprpyD IaEg mp £ memmo zC 00. 3 ~m _ g~~y W O'•'_7 "'FV aY~~Tv Ca S aam> ~y`O~rcSim~~mEgo'$ ~,mg ,atlma~°~~+L ~.~.,=o~r:~o zw$ •$Wm ee°~~1m e.°.. m.aQ1a'°m,em6mc'°E°~m~ SO -~'3-ffi a~c~3m~.~=S•Q mwoo .9R X00 F. GawE m'm ~"'.5 cam 0~20 @ 1 m!~N°omm ¢m~w v'3 «aama E6~a >o BpGv~e.a$;20' r of o'SE`oe wv°i-5~:°,>, a.~ my -6:6 gcagm ,5 o&vr mE.2.A w- ~e9q`80. da,~ m fi m°ea. o a-~E ffi._ u y m°e •o=•' 3WU 4aoy 'able gi _Egg amh Q a°a^m°E•3m am aTPfffi~~ffi~ffiY 'm>mymmffig~° ~ i 9am K Q m OY Ea pq 44 IM GG V N. m ° O wF ° m O~ tl ..o d om YmC_ o.ffi° E o m a$.~' ,m 0.0' w'7~a a° •'`m°O$ -9 o e,zi'3 ~~w 5A,;;qq~ de°y tl$~'a_mro` g mm m mho ffi _ me °s,' e8 ~m ffi56° o 6~a°vy°~am~m^ ~°Qp~8& °cm$~ 5 is so -0411 w m N 'O a ,•'7 q.~ m m a....~ T.. a..4 W .209 aD aem~me° ~a''n3 33r.~e au`°-'"'' ~9s5-amp c Y ~"L~ ~y V Q'g~~, +a~ '$Y8g f0 ma.. m a~c~C~v°ir d•Sa: a+..~ ~ti_~ a oa Y3S 3 3 i M z J Wheat Ridge Planning and Development Department PRE-APPLICATION MEETING SUMMARY Date: July 17, 2003 Attending Applicant(s): Michael G.Pharo, Laura Silstrap Michael G. Pharo Associates, Inc. 2835 W. Oxford Ave., #6 Englewood, CO 80110 (303) 783-3772 Attending Owner: Not in attendance Attending Staff: Alan White, Dave Brossman, Travis Crane, Michael Pesicka f WHEAT o ,p o wm v ~~~ORP~O Address or Specific Site Location: Immediately north of 1-70 Frontage Road North between Parfet Street and Oak vtrect. Existing Zoning: Commercial-One (C-1), Commercial-Two (C-2), Agricultural-One (A-1) Existing Comp. Agricultural Estate Residential (AER) Applicant/Owner Preliminary Proposal: Temporarily park automobiles on the C-1 parcel to alleviate overflow parking on Parfet Street by employees and inventory. Medved will consider paving the C-1 piece, and possibly putting in landscaping and public improvements in conjunction with the temporary parking area. The C-2 and A-1 pieces abutting the frontage road are in litigation, and are not owned by MedVed at this time. Those two parcels are not a deal breaker for development of this area. MedVed would like to take down the billboards along the frontage road. The project will be phased, with the temporary parking being the first phase, and then total redevelopment of the site. Will a neighborhood meeting need to be held prior to application submittal? Yes Planning comments: How long will the temporary parking situation exist? Will any used car sales be conducted? Anything planned for commercial development must be rezoned to Planned Commercial Development (PCD). A special use permit (SUP) will be run concurrently with the rezoning. An Outline Development Plan (ODP) can be submitted first to establish the zoning and parameters for the temporary parking of automobiles. A Final Development Plan can be submitted after the ODP has been approved. The City would like to see perimeter improvements along Parfet Street and Oak Street, specifce!!y curb, gutter, :walk and landscaping. ;II !llegc! parking on Parfet Street must stop. A neighborhood meeting will need to be held either at MedVed, or here at City Hall. After the neighborhood meeting has been held, a formal application can be submitted. A boundary survey and deeds for all properties involved will need to be submitted with the application. Public Works comments: Please see attached memo. Building comments: Not in attendance Streetscape / Architectural Design comments: Other comments: Property Owners Adiacent to Medved Colorado ODP Owner: LIC Investment, Inc. Site: 5000 Oak Street, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Mail: 4030 Vincennes Road, Indianapolis, IN 46268 Owner: New World Ventures, LLC Site: 4950 Oak Street, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Mail: 5875 N. Rogers Avenue, Chicago, IL 60646 Owner: Metzger Three, LLC Site: 4990 Parfet Street, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Mail: 201 Columbine Street #300, Denver, CO 80206 Owner: Oak Street Associates Site: 4980 Oak Street, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Mail: 274 Monroe Street, Denver, CO 80206 Owner: Charles Steismeyer Site: 4996 Parfet Street, Wheat Ridge CO 80033 Mail: same as above Owner: Frank Wehling Site: 506 Parfet Street, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Mail: same as above Owner: Bear Land Holdings, LLC Site: 11001 North 1-70 Service Road #170, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Mail: same as above f a ~ f mF S i~ ~ I ~4 p 't r~. : ~ m RJ I ~ 3 F L j ~ ~ ~ ~ h~, , ' ° ~ z ~ ~ I gyp`, ~i-~-`' ~ ~ ~ '~'t~~ ~.f ~ ~ S.+' I ~ ~ ~ "+,AF . ~ i, f b... '6 ? ~ ; 9 } 4. ~ ~ i 4""K ~ 'Y"~ „1 • ~ ~s ~ 4-,., - i4', ~ v _ . ~ , ~ ~ ~ s ~ . a ~ ~ ~°a ~ a m . ~ !'e~e_ ~ , ~ e 4.. , ~ ~ ~.r ~ , C T ~ ~ ~ ~~A r ~ J [yyy~ ~ j@~9 f i J~ "l ~ ~ V ~1 ~ ~ ~i ~ `?e'~4, t ~ A ~ 9>:/' f~ k ~ j A !y ~ ~ : Yew ..~.e j„¢~1 ~ l~ ; ^ .MF, ~ ~ t i _K. 2~ . py ""5 "M 4 ~I a^^ Yrt s v "4" f~~ ~w. ~ ~i r.'~ ~ . ~ ~ ~,e . , ~ ~ G ~ ~ ' ~ ~ a . t. ~ r P , , ~ ~ : G $ ~ ~ -l ~ Viz, _ . ~ ~ ~ , ,I ~ ~"`~t ~dl }}~q'yr, ~ s tl .,K. ~'"~9 ~p+"'' ~ i~g~(j ~P~i1 j~\E~ ~ ~ 3~I p Imo' t 3 ~3 . ~ ~k 1 ~ ~"y 7 5'f e :'^4 ~ ~ ? i. V ~ ~~,f i P 4 1 ~ ! " t 'd t 1 ~ y ~ 1 't r"'a, 4) f . S ~ ~ a i ,x°'H A iii 4^~ = spy p j p~~°' ~y ~_~y _ ~ ~ e % ~ ..9_ ~4c~ ~ ~ ~ £L kEY j~yEI x 'A S~~ 4.J ~ ~~g~~» ~ ~s, f ~ ~p^ «~L ~ j I`' 9dr', d ~ 3 P ~ . ,.v, ~ A""' P"~ ~ r ~a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ . ~ ~ ~ z ~ Via,. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ aE~` ~ ~ 3 x w ~ . ~ ~ ~ ; y ~ ~ 3 Vic. day ;#~7 g ~~tp~°~' tf ~}q !"a "d 7 3''~ ~ b 1 ~i. ~ f,. ~ 14 ! ° e d ~ Sai ~a, ku. 144y.~ 4.nF t-\ ~ d.!' 4.d ~ i ~ ~ " ~ ^.1 ✓t'~ 4 I ? P f ~ ~"4. *'t ~ 1 I ' I:iv m~ ~ r. ~ b ~ , ~ ~ ~+,.n+ f ~ ~ s.1 f ~ ~ a;,. A ~ f~~`" x ~ i ~,,.+8 ~y ~ I r~ ~9,`~ r rM1+~l~ ..,.I ,.b b*s F~ - 9 e I s t~~.. e 4 ~ Tai ~ ~ ~ ~.~T ~ ,~5 m~ w ..w, - E"~t °'^Q .Y" p ~y. i. ~ ""GMs ~ ~ ~ A V` ~r ~.F R V 6 } f ~ , b ~r `m 9 ~ '.~o T' PR ~ -q~rv r•« ym ~ ~ ~ i ' ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~E i., ~ ~ L. ~ ~ , , ~ ~ ~ . ; ~ s i a ~ e I~~ ~ , I ~ ~ . W~~.,. a _ ~ E~q m . f' r j p 7;. t" ~ ' ~ k `j t ~ ~ r `a ~ , ~ a ~ ~ ~ g I ~ x ~ ~6 ~ b~ A ~ ~ ~1 i i ~j g - } ~ esq. c t ~ ~ t Y`om' 9 ' f ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 a,~ T F~' R ~ ~ J Q~ ti. ~ } - ~ ~ R , , o ~ ; ~e ~ ~ ~ e , ~ „~o, ' , x ~ r ~ .w ~ r ~ w ~ ~ ` ~ e I ~ ~ sue' ~ ~ ~ I ~ , ~ ~ m .r I , a m- i,~ a { w i~ , ti a ~ ~ h! ~ + k ~ ~ F . f V' ! S / ? B A t F S \ L ~l ~ l I t ~ ~ f~ • ~ , F'7.. p 4 ~ ~ S '«7 ~ ~ ~ , s~, ~r . J ~ o a a ~ 1. e `y," ~ z°'e ~ `fin z j g"'~~ Y"+ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ p A t Q _ ~ ,.a ~ . r ~ ti ~ - s n ~5, ,v.m y ya }y ,_f ~ tia m. k a ~ ~ . . ~ , . f ~ py~ +~~yy ~u ~ ~r~ ~ ~e>a a ~a~., k •f'- M;~ r~ s d ~ ~ r ra ~ ~ r , ~ w .s - ~ , a,~~ j y ] ~ Me!` a+n 4C., ~a1 +.,d ! L ~ 1 V . ~ ~ x., ~ ~ s. ' 1 t~ a . ~ T _ ~ ~ 4 ~~~~E I ltd ' .~'A°, a 1 ~ .~a . ~ , , i~ , e~ r aA, r 9t y z INV. OUT`SINV. IN(E )=79.v5)' INV. IN(S)=78.75, 1 tf ~ 2_ 9 9 S o, F 11 (Z'n D "'t° 1 c r o c- r-7 T LIMITATIONS OF ACTIONS AGAINST LAND SURVEYORS !NV. OUT(Nl)-/,-j_/O' SUl'TE__" 150 ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW, YOUI t q} 1i uro P 89 , e 02, f Fax ('2303"' i WITHIN THREE AFTER O '"aSf.,' 1 wde' ,.:r 4.,,,P➢ s ''D Li , r H DEFECT, IN NO EVENT NlAY ANY 7 f A NCED MORE Tl 'AN DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE "OMM E lw A, i M, LAN 1 r _ 4 ~ ~ ! ! dry p b~ ~ d~ PORTION f OF _ ; ~ YEARS ~--ROM THE DATE OF THE I ? E 4, , I mw 7 '...~1 F ~q f 'vk q Y +y~p,~ g F II{~~j N ? h JEFFERSON, v. ~ ,d. 5..f ~ Ma } EO HERN. Cl TY OF h. r7 I r, June 18, 2003 Meredith Reckert City of Wheat Ridge 7500 W. 29m Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Dear Meredith, f , Per our conversation of June 11, 2003, 1 am writing to explain the sequence of events and the subsequent decisions that were made in regards to the storm damage repair at the Medved Autoplex, 11001 W. 1-70 Frontage Rd. N., Wheat Ridge, CO. As a result of the heavy snowfall on March 18, 2003, in order to get back to business as usual, we hired a company to bring in heavy equipment t, to facilitate moving the snow accumulation from our property. The equipment operator, being unfamiliar with our property, ran into curbs, drove over landscape areas, damaged security fence, and destroyed a gate. In addition to the damage caused by the snow removal, the snow also damaged the majority of trees on our property, some to the extent they had to P removed, collapsed an after hours parts drop-off shelter, damaged several of our new cars, and caused our Chrysler building to be without power for three days. As the Facilities Manager for the Medved properties in Wheat Ridge 4e and Castle Rock, I immediately started contacting our regular vendors to repair the damage. For the curb damage I contacted three companies to give us estimates for the cost of these repairs. We had 186 linear feet of curb damage at our Wheat Ridge campus, and 262 linear feet at Castle Rock. Additionally, in Wheat Ridge we had 30 square feet of sidewalk damage, and in Castle Rock there was 418 square 'p feet of damaged sidewalk. (see attached photo, „typical curb damage") Snow removal equipment caused approximately 1700 square feet of damage to landscaping (sod) in Wheat Ridge, and approximately 260 square feet in Castle Rock. In addition, three in ground irrigation control valves, and numerous sprinkler heads were destroyed. (see attached photo, "typical landscape damage") In early April, we had received three bids for the concrete repair work, the tree trimming and chipping was started, a new roof for the parts drop off 11001 WEST 1-70 FRONTAGE ROAD NORTH • WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80033 303-421-0100 • 303-940-9029 FAX • w . medved.com cage had been ordered, the fence and gate had been repaired, the only issue remaining was the sod repair. During this time frame, Valley Water District, ( Denver Water Board) had imposed severe watering restrictions due to the drought. At that time, the edict was no new landscaping, no new sod, no new seed, limited watering of existing landscaping, and high surcharges for wasteful water use. had a conversation with our General Manager, Bill Maffeo, at which time we decided that the most prudent thing to do would be to replace the destroyed sod, at the front of our dealership, visible from the frontage road and the interstate highway, with concrete. We were having a concrete company on site to make the curb repairs, watering restrictions excluded re- seeding or replacing the sod as an option, and we needed to remove an eyesore from our property as soon as possible. In addition, it was an area where we have traditionally parked vehicles, and the damage was so severe we weren't able to get any but four wheel drive units over the ruts left by the front loader's tires. And it would give us a head start on the number of display stalls required by Hummer. (see preliminary plans) Based on the above information, the decision was made to replace the damaged landscaping (sod) with concrete pads. As none of the work involved right of way, I, nor did the concrete contractor think that we needed a permit to perform what amounted to storm damage repair to existing property improvements. In Castle Rock, we are required to obtain a permit to replace curb and pan adjacent to the street. Everything on our property we can repair without a city permit. (see attached photos, "new concrete pad") However, after our conversation, I realize that my interpretation of storm damage repair does not apply to replacing one type of material with another, i.e., turf grass with concrete. Knowing what I know now, I believe my only recourse would have been to replace the damaged landscape with some type of fill material, such as mulch or rock. If I had known that irrigation restrictions would be changed, I could have possibly replaced the sod, but I, nor anyone else could have known that those restrictions would be eased. Sincerely, David Ward Facilities Manager Medved Colorado y?=y,.,Y'N^e`'fr"°ck „+."v(evf^E L C, n-w ti 9" r v'. L 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 303/ 235-2846 Fax: 303/235-2857 The City of Wheat Ridge January 13, 2003 Dennis Polk Holley Albertson & Polk 1667 Cole blvd. Suite 100 Building 19 Golden, Colorado 80401 Dear Dennis: Please consider this letter a follow-up to our conversation this fall regarding vacant property under ownership by the Medved auto dealership. The current dealer interest includes properties located at 11001 West I-70 Frontage Road (Chevrolet, GM, Hummer, Cadillac) and 11201 West I-70 Frontage Road North (Chrysler, Plymouth, jeep, pre-owned vehicles). It is the intent of the property owner to establish another dealership on vacant property located across the street at the northeast corner of Parfet Street and West I-70 Frontage Road North, addressed as 4950 and 4990 Parfet Street. Current zoning on the property is Commercial-One which would allow a car dealership as long as it is 1500 feet from an adjacent display and sales lots. On March 25, 2002, the City of Wheat Ridge zoning code was amended to allow adjacent display and sales lots to be located within 1500 feet of each other with approval of a special use permit. In order to establish a car dealership on the vacant parcel, a special use approval will be required as the property is less than 1500' from the nearest display lot. The special use process requires public hearings in front of both Planning Commission and City Council with a mandatory pre-application neighborhood meeting. An application component of the special use process is a detailed site plan. Other documents that will be required include a drainage plan, a traffic impact report and building elevations and perspective drawings. Another factor which may have a negative impact on the public hearing process are the existing zoning code violations occurring on the existing dealership properties. A visual inspection of the premises on December 10, 2003 revealed the following violations: • Blockage of required fire lanes on 11201 West I-70 Frontage Road North • Free access through fire emergency access required to be kept closed and locked on 11001 West I-70 Frontage Road • Display of inventory on landscaping on both properties • Parking of vehicles along Parfet Street (21 on the east side and 24 on the west side). The special use process has specific criteria staff uses to evaluate a request. Two of the SUP criteria deal specifically with history of zoning code compliance by the applicant and ability to meet conditions of the proposed special use permit. Unless the violations cited above are ceased immediately, staff will be hard-pressed not to bring these violations to the attention of City Council, which may be used as a basis for denial of the SUP. If the SUP is approved for a new dealership, the conditions of approval must be continually met or the approval can be rescinded. If the extent of the new dealership includes the A-1 parcels to the north and/or south, a zone change process is required as well. In light of that, another option to consider would be to pursue a zone change to planned development for the aggregated parcels. Processing time and required submittals would be somewhat the same as the special use process. Please do not hesitate to call me if you have questions. I can be reached at 303-235-2848. Sincerely, Meredith Reckert, AICP Senior Planner c: Alan White Code violation file Enclosures _i_-- - ~i _i - ~ i ~i i ~t11ff~~llCtlJl~B ~8t8d i ,i COrpOrBte Offices ~so2 Nay~es street Nashwie, TN 37203 Prx~-320-1777 / Fax615-320-'18$0 / ~ i / l MoustOn Of~oe i 52s-5a4a ~i Detroit Offbe Pr~oeao-ate-sass r i ~ ~ Ati~ Office / ~ Phd~5-8665 / ~ i ~i COItJfrIbIJB ~ / PhoBRA~-430-OC~67 i i ~i i ~120021~Uasbucd~re hoorpora~ed i ,i _ ~ . ~ i ~ j' % ~ ~ / / 1 t / % l 1 i / ~ J ` f r r / ,~r / _ .I/ / ~ % / / / ~ / / i l~~ / / , / / / % i ~ ~ j ~ i i l ~ t ~ ! / ~ i ,i D i ~ ~ j / i" / ~ ~ i / t i ! % ; i ~ i r..h,_,_..:,.. ' ' J ~ ~ / `i , J ~ ~ ' t j~ i f' ~ f~ ~ ~ ` / I ~ ` 1 % J Jr l ~ ~ ~ ~r ~1 - % i i I F r / / / ~ i y , f l / f i~ ~ ~ J Y II ~ i / 1 ~ ~f ~ ~ / ~ i < ~ f r _ . r.. r' r ` yr, ~ r I / / / ~ r ~ 1 r: ~ fr- ~ h~ J i i / ~ t 1 1 1 1 t 1 t ~ i i f , i ' i / j ~ i I ~ ? ~ r ~ ~ % ~ ~ ~ ~ / ,,G.,_ r~ ~ 1 ~ 7 / F, / f 1 ~ / I j r ` ! rF / ~ r 44 r, ~ ~r I r`~ ' ~ ~ i / / ! it ~ i ~ ~ ` ! / ! r ~ ~ ~ , r~ / r / r f~ J / r' ~ ~ ✓ ~ l f , VJ~ /~R / / ~ ~ / ' / r % ~ ~ J~ ~ F ~ / /tr ` k e i \ i ~ ~ i ! iY /j / ~ ~ i ! / ~ ~ ~ t r / /3 ~ \ f ! , j ! i ~ ~ I { j'l C t ! / ! / / ~ j i r ~ y . j . r % S r / / ~ ff/ ~ f ~ % ~ j l i / / / ~ 1! 'F~ y,: % i - ~ ! r' i i / . ! / / ` / r i~ / r / i / 1 .1....._ M.... / i ~ ~ ` / / j ~ rY / V' / t / y. f i e \`~Y.w{ . r ~ i , ~ - i , ~ ~V: % / { it / fJ / , ~i r J i i~ i/ / lr~ i ~i i li ' ~ r i % r / E~ ~ , e r' ~ / ~ ~ % ` r` I tit` ~ 1 ~ / s ~ , f r 1 % t 1 ~ i~'L~ ~ i / / / / ~ ~ J, i/ / ~f ~ ~ ire ~ i ! ~ ~ ~ [ ~ / ( FBI i j ~ ~ % ~ F ~ ~ E i r~' J ~ % f i' 1~ Jr T I X i ~ ~ 's~ ! r I I j r' ' ~ i' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ , i , i ~f ! 1 ~ % r ~ \ ~ r % i ~ y ~ , J r, f,~ i" i~t / ' f i ~ r rr' r ii , , / % r ~ i~ % .f i~ r F/ i f ~ is s ~ a it r r` ~ ~ , s r~ ~ % F' r%/ yi (l i' J i' / / ~ % %1 i J r . ~ r / f f~ r % r ~ ; ~ . c , ~ ~ \ V i j~, I / ` 1 II k_ ~ ~I l~ Site Plan 3 ~ Y f " r °r"°'°"' a r x ~ i .m..~.. ~ TOTAL PRODUCTIVE SERVICE -MECH. X36 Li 05-25-M CUSTOMER PARKING 91 \ ~ NEW VEHICALE STORAGE 375 scale m" is 440'wO* EMPLOYEE PARKING & MISC. gg GENERAL OFFICE 4,714 sf project PARTS 8,607 sf sheet MIMI -70 FRONTAGE ROAD (NORTH) r M~ Lof.-- shoot's _ `s ; . ~ , ~I m P dfl1 _ ~ 34'-4' 83'-4' IHI T -TT-------~ ~c _ _ . ~ ~--7 C`-1 ~ ~ s tt ~ t~ccr r+c ~ ~ L` Z T O 1 _U m +J m w Y'" . i. F~~__ '~^=r a t rh 4 1 M e~S_ i 1 1 O f. . o- 1 rt N ~ ~ r . i ~ 2 z } ~ ~ O v Q ~ U a W Q 1 ra v = Z 0 -i r r ~ ~ r ~ ac c i 1 a F ~ ~ $ 4 i / U -t . o djn ,a Z ~ j t 1 .r' i .y C t L~ 'S Y 4 djm d~ecketl 0 date scale project # sheet ago" 5 O sheet's - w ~nfastruct~e Incorporated Corporate Office ~eo2 Hays stmt Nashv~e, TN 37203 Pf~cBA6-320-1TT7 Fax615-320-188Q HOtlStOtt Offl09 Pry-~s-saaa~ Detroit Office ~r,oero-8~s-sass At~ta Office Cokmbus Offks STEEL SEAMS F STCR'RCNT Pnae~a-ago-oc~ STEELMAS R~MDL RCF SYSTEM p2oo2 nNas~rucare rxanaatsd a ~r' 1G r~3 xsr(A; ~ rt W,k. S 5,p1, ~ A. v ~ , tr'y' ,.tY~ i. ~ ti st, a~ Y ,r b2G 4%`< ~ M sr, ALCM. STOREF ~AC'x~Rx~y~ • • M6wASSi a "i+ f.9 l~ P~E$_i1 X91 ® 'A- ®i ~MYI. E - i_ s _ - _ - , ~ s "4 f s a t ~y5~y` k _ ~'~~t 9 f ~A - mss a~ 't~~ i.' w fit. ; ~i~'. B a'rfn _ ~ . y~~~;~ ,~~j+ "n, • ! ~ • s „ ~ ~ s ~ XNj :'w, <n•. J:. 1 4 S~~IT--PAGE CM - T 1 T U SAN 0 MATCH SCI ~ ~fi3 SILVERY N M40 LOCH ALUM, Q RHEAD CR SY VE S Rear Elevation STEELMASTER R-MODEL L BEAMS FI1 Ta MAT ROOF SYSTEM Il fi75 Q SfD A fAi~ L M C h { 3~' ~ O ~I ' SPUT-FACE CMU - S MATCH ICI X1363 "SILVERY MOO AIU~I. OVERHEAD DOOR SY ALUM. ~T~REf RANT A I Y GLZNGSS M T~ ~ LEAR RU STAlN TO _ _ _ YI+~d 7Me.~f Y T 3 MaONLIGH ~a~~w""~~~ ~r~ N ~ L . ~ ~ its. y ~ ~ ~ ~o ~ v~ ~ o r r r r r i 4 W r ~ r ~ 0 3~ r • r r r arr r ~.x.~ Z~ • # r r > x, F - v ,A~ ray , q,.,,.,,,.,~ ~o w rr - ~~m rr rr W ~ ~ ~ o~ - ~ii ~J OC ~ 3 0 4..n o 0 z c a~ ~ ~ v 0 p 1lta = 1 "C~ project memo sheet 3 Q of 5 sheets ~nfrastnxt~e Incorporated Corporate Office X02 strut f~sMn~le. TN 37203 Phc~A6-320-1777 Fax615-320-1880 HOUS~OIt 0108 Ptio'f~S-528-5444 1 ~@ 1 Pr108AD-81fi-6766 i Atlanta Office f ~-assb STEELMASTER R-MODEL ROOF SYSTEM Cokxnbus Office Pr~aa~a-~,~o-oos~ I t PAINTED HUMMER WORD LACQUER PAINTED FINISH TO GRAY MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW-2131 "STEEPLE I i ALUM. FiNiSH STOREFRONT GLAZING SYSTEM W/ CLEAR GLASS. r M O N ~ ' ~ as ~ 2 ~ `o ~ y i • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • • • z ALUM. FINISH STOREFRONT GLAZING SYSTEM W/ CLEAR GLASS. Z ° m p •p 'o W HORIZONTAL METAL SIOING - FACFINISH 70RY APPLIED FINISH TO MATCH #SW-1d01 "SILVER PLATE" ~j' v ~ -0 a> ~ ~ "a R m . . ~ m ~r a'~ 3 ~ ~ a ~ ~ Y • • • • • ~ • • • • • i o • • • • ~ • i • • • • • • • ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 • • • 0 • & Z SPLIT-FACE CMU -STAIN TO ~ ~ • MATCH ICl #1363 "SILVERY MOONLIGHT" . . c m dJm ALUM. FINISH STOREFRONT GLAZING SYSTEM W/ CLEAR GLASS. V Q 05-23-03 projec-t ~ shwt 4 m ~ of 5 s Inf~astruucture Ir~carporated Corporate Office 9 ~so2 t~ay~s Strut Nastr~e, TN 37203 t PhaB~;-320-17TT Fax615-320-18~ HOUBtO~t OfflCB 4 PhdfB-5~8-5444 D9!b'Oit UffIC6 ~r,o~aeas~s-sass r~ At► office Phd~-325.8665 ' f (i z !i Et COItxllbus Offer ' ~ i! i 1~ t r _ P►,ori~a-4.90-037 ~ } 1 i i1 :l I~ 1 n 1 ~ 2002 ~firasUucb~ t~oorporated f.._ I~ ` ~ i ~ ~r ~ _..,.uIY~M... y 1 l 7 / 1 . f ~ ~I ti ( ~ i t ~ 1 ~ ~ t it i I r j iI ~ ~ i : ! i f i iii i ~ i 1 ~ j f ! :z ~ ~ r i~ ~ a 3 L j __T'°' i i a i i F i~ ~ .S 't ~ w~: x Y.~Afi ,p•, r~' ~ . P i tp _'•Mt .y ,f,, .6 L 4 A." .r. ~,L P~' ~ A. ' .A~e „~x,e A~~., r... ' ~l~s ti 1 ~ ~ J;; _ ~ ~ M O N ;o ~ ~o S1E~,t,~tAS'1~ ~'-If. S9~EIG""IttRN. P d ~ ~ ~`o ,~....,._._..,r.. w.__.. - , v~ ~ o s;= '3 i v ~ ,S Q v t• 3 Z = yy o 'p 'a ~ l' 1 t"' ~'.1 m ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ ds ~ m ~3 m o 0 z i j•.: i. t :;ti c 41 •'Y 4. E ~ ~ v 0 t' ~ eta I'-O" project # Building Section B-B sheet C ~A .r. 4~ Of shwts Wheat Ridge Community Development Department PRE - APPLICATION MEETING SUMMARY Date: July 17, 2003 Attending Applicant(s): Michael G.Pharo, Laura Silstrap Michael G. Pharo Associates, Inc. 2835 W. Oxford Ave., #6 Englewood, CO 80110 (303) 783 -3772 Attending Owner: Not in attendance Attending Staff: Alan White, Dave Brossman, Travis Crane, Michael Pesicka Address or Specific Site Location: Immediately north of 1 -70 Frontage Road North between Parfet Street and Oak Street. Existing Zoning: Commercial -One (C -1), Commercial -Two (C -2), Agricultural -One (A -1) Existing Comp. Agricultural Estate Residential (AER) Applicant/Owner Preliminary Proposal: Temporarily park automobiles on the C -1 parcel to alleviate overflow parking on Parfet Street by employees and inventory. Medved will consider paving the C -1 piece, and possibly putting in landscaping and public improvements in conjunction with the temporary parking area. The C -2 and A -1 pieces abutting the frontage road are in litigation, and are not owned by MedVed at this time. Those two parcels are not a deal breaker for development of this area. MedVed would like to take down the billboards along the frontage road. The project will be phased, with the temporary parking being the first phase, and then total redevelopment of the site. Willa neighborhood meeting need to be held prior to application submittal? Yes Planning comments: How long will the temporary parking situation exist? Will any used car sales be conducted? Anything planned for commercial development must be rezoned to Planned Commercial Development (PCD). A special use permit (SUP) will be run concurrently with the rezoning. An Outline Development Plan (ODP) can be submitted first to establish the zoning and parameters for the temporary parking of automobiles. A Final Development Plan can be submitted after the ODP has been approved. The City would like to see perimeter improvements along Parfet Street and Oak Street, specifically curb, gutter, walk and landscaping. All illegal parking on Parfet Street must stop. A neighborhood meeting will need to be held either at MedVed, or here at City Hall. After the neighborhood meeting has been held, a formal application can be submitted. A boundary survey and deeds for all properties involved will need to be submitted with the application. Public Works comments: Please see attached memo. Building comments: Not in attendance Streetscape /Architectural Design comments: Other comments: contacts: Alan White — Community Development Director Tim Paranto — Public Works Director Dave Brossman — Development Review Engineer Meredith Reckert — Senior Planner Travis Crane — Planner Michael Pesicka — Planner Darin Morgan — Codes Administrator Kathy Field — Adminstrative Assistant 303 - 235 -2844 303 - 235 -2860 303 - 235 -2864 303 - 235 -2848 303 - 235 -2849 303 - 235 -2845 303 - 235 -2853 303 - 235 -2846 Staff Initials: „ a � tiw ? 4k � City of Wheat Ridge Department of Public Works July 17, 2003 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 7500 WEST 29 AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 Pre - Application Meeting for Medved Auto Dealership Expansion Public Works Requirements 2 Copies of the following shall be submitted for review: 1. A Final Drainage Report and Plan (signed and sealed by a Professional Engineer). 2. Grading & Erosion Control Plan (signed and sealed by a Professional Engineer). 3. Street Construction Plans (signed and sealed by a Professional Engineer), which shall include a plan and profile of the public improvements along Parfet and Oak Street frontages, and Standard COWR details for all constructed items. A CD -ROM containing the City's Street Construction Standard Details in AutoCAD .DWG format is available at the City of Wheat Ridge Department of Public Works for $20.00. 4. Site Plan (signed and sealed by a Professional Land Surveyor), which shall include the following: a. 24” X 36" sheet format. b. A Vicinity Map. c. The boundary of the site described in bearings and distances, and existing and proposed lot lines. d. A Legal Description of the site, including tie(s) to the Section. e. A Basis of Bearing statement. f. Signed certification from a Professional Land Surveyor licensed in the state of Colorado. g. A scale and north arrow. h. Date of map preparation and name & address of person who prepared map. i. Location of 100 -year floodplain, if applicable. j. Existing and proposed contours at 2 -ft intervals. k. Adjacent street(s), including Right -of -Way width(s), name(s), ROW centerline(s). 1. Location of all existing & proposed easements and rights -of -way, fences, walls, drainageways, ditches, buildings to be developed or retained on site. 4. If the parcels to the south (currently zoned C -2 & A -1) are incorporated into this development, a Final Plat (Consolidation Plat) shall be required. After City approval of the Plat, a CD -ROM containing the approved Final Plat document shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works. 5. Ten (10) feet of Right -of -Way dedication will be required along Oak Street. If a Plat is submitted, the Right-of-Way shall be dedicated by Plat, otherwise a separate Warranty Deed is needed. Additional Requirements: • Proof of Ownership for the property, e.g., Warranty Deed, Title Commitment, etc. • Due to the proposed area of development being greater than I acre, an NPDES Permit shall be required from the State of Colorado (CDPS permit). This permit is issued through the Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment, Water Quality Control Division. — ('Ac DraW.�� S-I 1/1Y a� Project Sub i a�- I ternal Checklist Introduced at Micro Dev on q 03 Priority 9/ ❑ 1.. Will a neighborhood meeting be.required? ❑ 2. What will the,process be? Admin, PC or. CC (circle all that apply) A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. Outline Plan (conceptual - zoning only). Final Development Plan Combined Outline & Final Development Plan (full site plan) Rezoning — PCB Minor Subdivision (with without dedication) (circle one) Major Subdivision (with or without dedication) (circle one) Consolidation Plat Supplemental Variance- Special Use Permit Lot Line Adjustment ❑ 3. Will drainage study be required? When? At time of submittal, public hearing or building permit? (circle one) ❑ 4. Will a traffic impact analysis be required? When? At time of submittal, public hearing or building permit? (circle one) ❑ 5. Will any right -of -way be required for dedication? ❑ 13. How much? C_ feet) Where? ❑ 6. Will this property need to be platted or re- platted? ❑ 7. Will any easements be required? ❑ For streetscape, cross access, utility, or drainage (circle all that apply) ❑ 15. Where? ❑ 8. Will full engineered documents (construction drawings) be required? 9. When? At time of submittal, public hearing or building permit? (circle one) Will public improvements need to be constructed (or escrow taken in lieu ?) List improvements and locations: ❑ 10. Will streetscape improvements be required? Where? ❑ 11. To what extent? Will any street lights be required? ❑ 12. Is the property located within a floodplain area? ❑ 13. Will a soils test be required? ❑ When? At time of submittal, public hearing or building permit? (circle one) a 14. Will grading and erosion control plan be required? ❑ When? At time of submittal, public hearing or building permit? (circle one) ❑ 15. Will a subdivision improvement agreement be required? ❑ 16. Does this fall under the street width designation? 17. Will the project need to be referred to CDOT? � � d - led -7e 7/7/3 Michael G. Pharo Associates, Inc. July 7, 2003 Ms. Meredith Reckert Office of Planning and Development 7500 West 29` Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215 Re: Medved Auto Dealership Dear Meredith: Please find enclosed materials requested for a pre- application conference scheduled for July 17 at 1:30 p.m. These maps were provided to you at an earlier date, but are still the best graphics we have at this time. The purpose of the pre- application meeting is to review the criteria necessary to allow for the construction of an auto dealership with ancillary uses on the subject property. It is my understanding that due to the present status of the various parcels which comprise the property and the regulations of the City, it will be necessary to accomplish an immediate rezone of the parcel to the north, provide for a future rezone of a parcel to the south when ownership becomes final, obtain a special use permit due to the 1500 -foot situation and provide a Phase 2 site plan for the entire project. It is our desire to utilize the property for employee parking as soon as possible to relieve existing conditions at the existing dealership and to provide for the storage of dealership inventory. We further desire to phase our submittal in a fashion that allows the entitlement and initial use of the property to occur with the architectural design to be submitted for approval at a later date. Based upon your letter to Dennis Polk of January 13, 2003, and our meeting, I believe we have an understanding of the direction we are heading. I look forward to detailing the requirements of the entitlement process at the pre - application meeting. Enclosed is our check for $200 for the pre- application submittal fee. MGP /kp Enc. c: Dennis Polk 2835 West Oxford Ave., #6 Englewood, Colorado 80110 phone: 303/783 -3772 fax: 303/783 -3773 7500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215 Whe Ridge Telephone 303/ 235 -2846 FAX 303/235 -2857 October 10, 2000 Dennis Polk Holley Albertson and Polk 1667 Cole Blvd #100 Golden, CO 80401 Dear Dennis: This letter is in regard to your application for approval of a site plan for development for property addressed as 4990 Parfet Street. The proposed plan shows a two -phase project, the first of which allows for interim vehicle storage of up to 915 vehicles. The second phase consists of two dealership buildings plus an office /warehouse /showroom with over 135,000 square feet of total building area. The application you have submitted consists of a Type I site plan with multiple buildings. Staff believes that a planned building group plan process would be a more appropriate for the following reasons. The Wheat Ridge Code of Laws allows only one building per developable lot. Therefore, a subdivision plat would also need to be processed to create separate parcels for each of the proposed structures. In addition, staff does not believe that a type I site plan shows enough detail to adequately review and determine potential impacts of the proposal. The requirements for the planned building group plan must meet the requirements of a Type II site plan. See attached code section. Zoning on the properties shown as being encompassed by the site development plan includes C- 1, C -2 and A -1. The agriculturally zoned properties must be rezoned before they can be used for any commercial development purposes. The closest adjacent car lot is located at the northwest corner of Miller Street and the north I -70 frontage road. The eastern property line of the existing Cadillac dealership (11001 W.1 -70 Frontage Road North) is currently 1650 feet away from this existing facility. The City's C -1 zone district regulations specify that there must be a minimum separation between adjacent lots of 1500'. Expansion of your dealership to the east side of Parfet Street reduces this separation down to 1050'. Pursuant to Section 26- 22(E)(2) of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, car lots with less than the required 1500' separation are allowed only as a special use. The special use permit can be processed simultaneously with the other applications being requested. Does the applicant have ownership of the parcels to the south? If not, a power of attorney from the landowner will be required in order to process the application. Please submit property deeds for all parcels included in the request and appropriate powers of attorney. Other items of concern: • In order to secure an access to the property from the north frontage road, a CDOT access permit must be submitted and processed. • Oak Street is currently substandard relative to our requirements for a local street. At least 30' of right -of -way will be required to be dedicated for street purposes. The developer will be responsible for the installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk and pavement to full street width for both the Oak Street and Parfet Street frontages. • What is being proposed for the ditches crossing the property? Ditch companies must be involved in the review process. • Does the proposal include facilities for Hummer testing? • Staff will be recommending that at a minimum, 30' of right -of -way be dedicated for W. 50 Avenue with this application. If you have questions regarding any of the above, do not hesitate to contact me at 303 - 235 -2848. Please let me know at your earliest convenience how you wish to proceed. Sincerely, Meredith Reckert, AICP. Senior Planner c: Alan White Mike Garcia Medved file P AR C E L PARCEL I ► EA ST Q UARTER OF THE SOUTH WEST QUARTER OF SECTION- 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH,, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MER IDI A N i P DESC COMM A T E QU QUA RTER SOUTH WEST N00 0 12 # 58"W THE ' OF THE SOUTH WEST Q UARTER OF SAID SECTION 16, A DISTANCE OF 488.01 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING- THENCE CONTINUING i DISTANCE OF 5 8 2 . 79 i • ! i AL ONG i LINE THAT IS 247.50 FEET SOUTHERLY AND P E QUARTER OF THE SOUTH WEST QUARTER ' THE EASTERLY R IGHT- O F-W A Y PA ST THENCE S00025'14"E ALONG S EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY A DISTANCE OF i FEET TO • POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE DENVER AND NORTHNVESTERN RAILROAD DESCRIBED IN BOOK A P AGE 583; ' ALONG SAID OF LINE + DISTANCE OF 548 R POINT OF *' i t t +►, 1�,ARCEL 2 A PAR OF LAND LO T QU QUARTER • TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH RANGE •. WEST OF 1 PR M ERIDIAN " ' TICULARLY DESCR AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTH EAST CO t SOUTH WEST Q U ARTER 1 `` AL O THE SOUTH WE ST QUAR i► a NCE OF 1070 FEET TO T P OINT TRUE DISTANCE OF 247 QUA RTER EAST Q UARTER OF THE SOUTH WEST • 530.75 FEET TO A ,O T HE , THE NCE S00025'14"E ALONG SAID E ASTERLY R IGHT-OF-WAY A DIST i • A LONG TH IS 247.50 FEET SOUTHERLY A ND PAR ■ NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH E Q U A RTER SECTION 16, A 52 E TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. M ayor i ME �+V rs.'0 R �r ,1 rs 6 M y , ® i County Clerk and Recorders Certification State of Colorado ) V ic 1 0 0nit OM/ Consultants Applicant,- Medved Chevrolet, Inc. c/o Holle Albertson & Polk 1667 Cole Blvd., Suite 100 g ross Golden, Colorado 80401 Owner: Metz Three LLC openspace & 1001 Lincoln Avenue acres Denver, Colorado 80203 Surve Martin/Martin landscape 4251 Kiplin Street 1,04 Wheat Rid Colorado 80033 Planner- Michael G. Pharo Associates,, Inc. 2835 West Oxford Avenue, 96 2.14 En Colorado 80110 Technical Data land g ross dwellin floor/area maximum 1 st door s roads & openspace & use acres units ratio s foota foct_�i shown parkin landscape Residential 1,04 3 Office/Warchouse/Showroom 2.14 - .40 37,265 s ft. 3 5,721 s ft. 44,845 s ft. 13 s ft. at 15% Auto Dealership/ Commercial - A 4.38 .25 47,1698 s ft. 3 7,15 0 s ft. 95,397 s ft. 47,698 s ft. at 25% Auto Dealership/ Commercial - B 4.633 .25 50,421 s ft. 37,150 s ft. 100,842 s ft. 50,420 s ft. at 25% 12.19 acre 135,384 s ft. 110,021 s ft. 241,084 s ft. 112,092 s ft. 4 Notes 1. Attached le description defines presen'l fee ownership of 10.98 acres. Remainin portion of site shown on plan -presentl bein ac 2. Existin residential includes 3 existin residences. No new residences are proposed. September 12, 2000 + \43 N4