Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMS-98-03 800I~ PAGE ~-IAppY L~~I~IN A REPEAT OF THE NORTH 3/4 OF THE NORTH 3/5 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF LOT 1, RECEPTTON N0. SOT 1, DLOCK 2 DART~!'S SUDDTVTSTON BATE A SUBDIVISION TN THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHI fC1WNfiNTP ITN RANrF' Fq WF~T OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERTDIAN w CITY OF WHEAT RTDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF FINAL PLAT P F DEDICATION ' - Saulsbury Properties LLLP, being fhe owner(s) of the real properly of 2.066 acres described as follows: t NORTH 3/4 OF THE NORTH 3/5 Of THE WEST 1/2 OF LOT 1 38th Avenue l BLOCK 2, - BARTH'S SUBDIVISION COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, Y e STATE OF COLORADO SITE ~ y b N Y L gY A m O N 1' and has laid out, subdivided and platted said land as per the drawing 'hereon contained under the a name and style of Happy Landings, a subdivision of a part of the City of Wheai Ridge, Colorado, and by these presents does dedicate to the City of Wheat Ridge and the public aana avenue streets, roads and avenues and drives as shown on the accomp anying Flat for the public use thereof forever and does (do) further dedicate to the use of the City of Wheat Ridge and all municipally owned and/ar g municipally franchised utilities and services chose portions of said real property which are so designated as $ easements and righis-of-way for the construction, installation, operation, maintenance, repair and ~ replacement Tor all services, including without limiting the generality of the foregoing,,lelephone and zsm nwnue electric lines, work, poles and underground cables, gas pipelines, water pipelines, sanitary sewer Tines, street lights, culverts, hydrants, drainage ditches and drains and all appurtenances thereto, it being expressly understood and agreed by the undersigned chat all expenses and costs 'evolved in conslructing and ~ installing sanitary sewer system works and lines, gas service lines, electrical service works and lines, storm sewers and drains, street lighting, grading and landscaping, curbs, gutizrs, street pavement, sidewalks and 28th Avenue 1 other such utilities and services shall be guaranteed and paid for by the subdivider or arrangements made by the subdivider therefor which are approved by the City of Wheat Ridge, and such sums shall not be paid by the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado, and that any item so constructed or installed when accepted by the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado, shall become the sole property of said City except items owned by municipally i- _ franchised utilities and/or the Mountain Stales Telephone and Telegraph ~'ompany which items, when constructed or insiallecJ shall remain the property of the owner and shall not become the property of the City. Holder of deed(s) of trust hereby releases claim to areas dedicated to public use. 20th Avenue ~ 5 STATE OF COLOR)ADO a o COUNTY OF JEFFERSON) ~ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of VICINITY MAP A.D. 19----' bY Witness my hand and official seal. My Commission expires NOTES THE EMERGENCY AND SERVICE VEHICLE ACCESS EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED BY THE OWNER AND SUBSEQUENT OWNERS, HEIRS, I Notary Public SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. IN THE EVENT THAT SUCH CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE IS NOT PERFORMED BY SAID OWNER, THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT T ENTER SUCH EASEMENTS AND PERFORM NECESSARY WORK, THE COST OF WHICH SAID OW HEIRS, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS AGREES TO PAY UPON BILLING. 2.) THE STORM DETENTION AREA SHOWN ON THE APPROVED DRAINAGE PLAN SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED BY THE OWNER AND SUBSEQUENT OWNERS, HEIRS, SUCCE AND ASSIGNS. IN THE EVENT THAT SUCH CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE IS NOT OWNERS PERFORMED BY SAID OWNER, THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO ENTE AREA AND PERFORM NECESSARY WORK, THE COST OF WHICH SAID OWNER, HEIRS, SUCCES SAULSBURY PROPERTIES,LLLP, ACOLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CORPORATION AND ASSIGNS AGREES TO PAY UPON BILLING. I i NO BUILDING OR STRUCTURE WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE DETENTION AREA AND NO CHA BY: OR ALTERATIONS AFFEC7WG THE HYDRAULIC CHARRCTERISTICS OF THE DETENTION AREA WI HAROLD R. SMETHILLS, MANAGING PARTNER BE MADE WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS. , t i 1546 COLE BOULEVARD SUITE 227 GOLDEN, COLORADO 80401 3.) THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LIES IN FLOOD HAZARD ZONE C -AREA OF MINIMAL FLOODING. (303) 233-3447 4.) THE UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN ARE DEDICATED FUR THE INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, AN REPLACEMENT OF ELECTRIC, GAS, TELEVISION CABLE, AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES. 1 UTILITIES SHALL ALSO BE PERMITTED WITHIN ANY ACCESS EASEMENTS AND PRIVATE STREET THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS DAY IN THE SUBDIVISION. PERMANENT STRUCTURES AND WATER METERS SHALL NOT BE PERMIT OF 1997 BY AS OF e.. 1' 1 WITHIN SAID UTILITY EASEMENTS. SAULSBURY PROPERTIES, LLLP, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILi~Y LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CORPORATION. 3 5•I PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OF ANY TREE SHOWN ON THE FACE OF THIS PLAT, APPROVAL i MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MUST BE RECEIVED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT. REMOVAL 0 THESE MATURE TREES WILL BE ALLOWED ONLY WHEN IN DIRECT CONFLICT WITH A BUILDIN WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. FOOTPRINT PROPOSED WITH NEW HOME CONSTRUCTION. Z 6.) THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ZONED PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. NOTARY PUBLIC 7.) ALL OWNERS, TENANTS AND GUESTS SHALL BE ALLOWED FREE MOVEMENT THROUGH THE A EASEMENT/EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS AND USE OF OVERFLOW PARKING. ie ~ i CASE HISTORY NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL MS-98-3 ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE (3) YEA AFTER Yflil FTR4T IITC(:nV~R CII(:I-I f1FFFCT TN N(1 F\/ANT AAAY ANY ACTT(1N  ~ ~ BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED UPON MORE THA TEN (10) YEARS FROM THE DATE Of CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. L C.R.S.13-80-105(3)(a). P9'T •r BOOK PAGE DECEPTION N01 f .OT ~ DLOCK 2 DART~I'S SUDDIVTSION DATE I(\IrPI [T(-\ '7 ("~l111t11 11•\1171 f•(1-Il(1 (I 1 \Ia 1 \I 1 i 1~ 1 it 1~ l(■ !a! t 3 ( i ~s~ ® ' 1 ~ ~ C.( r 4 j ! i ~ - d 1. ~y- a1 i 32ND AVENUE 1 ~ R 0 BASIS ,OF BEARING _ WnRTN LINE LiF TIC SE I/4 OF SECTI®N 26-3-69 , N90'00 00 E 2637.75 . . 131$ 23.00' °o ~ i CEttl'ER ff SCCT87N 26-3-69 o _ _ iOUND 03' BRASS CAP TM ° _ _ _ _ _ . _ r RANC£ 8LU4 LS 1322E.*,.~~, _._m_ T , ' t>RTHwEST CIBdNER IIF I.qT I, NORTH LINE OF LOT 1, BLOCK 2, BARTH S SUBDIVISION i ` j BLt~K 2, BARTH'S SUBDIVISII]N , t ~ ~ N90 00 00 E 317.22 ~ ~ ~ 24,7s • 3.98 o 141.94' 3' ; . 218.24 10 UTILITY EASEMENT ° , ~ , ~ " I 0.64 ~ 90 04 46 9 5517 1033 t7~ . 90 (-TYP.) -T---G- -t t ~ ! I I 1110,84' • ` 26 DITCH EASEMENT 16.43 I I I I • • ~ • 1774'38" I I i I I I 'F i I I I 1 IIII I I , ~ I ° r r. I 1 ~ 82'17 S III( I,, o I I 120.61' s ,I I i~ 1 1 I I~ I I I 33.68' I ~ I""_----I I 1 Q, i ~ I 1 SOT 2 _ I I p ~ 1 IIII 1 i l ~ I I 14,241.53 SQ. FT. f I I } ~ I l 1 • 1i f - ❑ I _ , rI I 1 I I III I I I i (y o I I l_OT 1 ~ I IIII ~ I I 48,157.31 SQ. FT. t , t DETENT10N1 I-' I ~ POND ❑ I I I (I~ ( 1 I I EASEMENTI r~ ~ r ~ ~ r o I. ~ . I n I ~ ~ ~ I I i W~ o ~ I o o I I t i I G i l(~ I° r ~ I rf i i a ~ i I i I ~ i i ~I ~ I I ~ I I I I 16715'24" o, IIII W I I I i r _I p ,~r 0 _ o`~ IIII i _90004 ~ a o ~ I I ~ , ~ ~ _ .I ~ ~ ~ o I o i I 5 OF R.O.W. EREBY DEDICATE 1 r d , ~ ~ ~ 1 ! i 4 . . I.1 _ ~ IIII o 8 55 ~ r~? 9 04 02 I I ~ (~194'a0'00" • ,I ~ ~ ~ ' ( III 2 - , I...... s.. o M - 110.00 ~ i 110.00 9°55'58" 900402 30 NONEXCLUSIVE , _m _ ^ y i ~ 4 ACCESS EASEMENT i 24.00 o T 2 _.e ~ O UTILITY EASEMEN RGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS ACE a WEST 31ST hL I 6.00 4 0 ~ R a W ~ -------------------r I I I I I I DETENT - _ - _ _ i I I i 1 ► I POND - :~~.r~, w I I I I I ASEME ....__...,m_..__.....n.....a...~._ I I I 1 I ,3 ~ I F~ I 1 i v 6~ I I ~ i f 1 I. I LOT 4 1 1 LOT 3 i~ i I I I I I~ I I I 13084.26 SQ. FT. t i I II , z ~ 13,083.89 SQ. FT. t I ~I ao 1 I r I I I . I I~; ~ ~ I I I i pl ca I ~ I I I i I -4; I ~ I I I I rl I I ~I a ~ i I I 5 UTILITY EASEMENT I i I i I I; I TYP. i i I I K_~. b I ( ) I I I i II ~ I f I I 1 I II ~ , I y I i I I 1 I-~--3o.ot ( III w I I i I 1 a I I I I I i I I I I III -------J L.-------- --_..----.-.-_.J 1------®----...,..,..,. 9Q ~b2'~- 9o'a4'o2" 10 UTILITY EASEMENT so'o4b5" ~ " ~ ' I III o ~ , T P. ' 9a'a4 05 89 55 110.00 92.22 Y 110.0 317.22' 1 r"~ s ~ (~i ~ t ~ ~ ~ I i r I L f p . , i. I f f f f, ~i I ! ~ 11 I- ~ 1, ~ 9 t' `1 I't C . ti# ' _~,i ~ ,J , J t_ _ i F~ r^, = I ~`,,,1 ~ f~ ,I 1 Y J CASE HISTORY MS-98-3  FAX:(303)794-4703 u`JV' u DRAWN JOB NUMBER scam 06-071093-00 2 OF 2 - - - to gK CM2, Inc. MANAGEMENT 1546 Cole Boulevard, Suite 227, Golden, CO Tel: 303-233-3447 / Fax: 303-239-8616 November 4, 1998 Mr. Robert Midaugh City Manager City of Wheat Ridge 7500 West 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80215-6713 S~ ni; - k-aclq, IP R ~ Re: Happy Landings Subdivision Dear Bob, I am writing to inform you that there have been developments regarding this project that I believe are very positive in that they represent a coming together of the City Council's actions, and the desires and common goals of the neighbors and the property owner. At the public hearing of August 24, 1998 which resulted in the approval of the subdivision of the property known as Happy Landings, and your case number MS-98-3, citizens and members of the City Council expressed interest in preserving the turn of the century home which is located on the property. As a result, the City Council voted a request that your office enter into negotiations with the applicant to preserve the home, and reduce density. On August 31 st, the owner of the property received a letter from your office requesting that we meet with the neighbors to discuss how the existing house may be preserved. This information was given to me by the owner, with the instruction that I contact the neighbors which had made this request of the City Council. Subsequently, I met with Margaret Parry who lives at 3060 Teller Street. I told her that the property owner has always been interested in saving the early 1900's house on the property, but that we could not reduce the number City of Wheat Ridge November 3, 1998 Page 2 of apartment units since they were already under construction. We discussed other changes that could be made, and I gave her a sketch of the plan that had been presented to your office in September as a suggestion of a way of preserving the house without increasing density on the total site. Once we began conversations with the neighbors, we suspended construction of the apartments, awaiting their input, and insuring that we would not foreclose opportunities to save the house and its surrounding trees. It is my understanding that Ms. Parry circulated the sketch within the neighborhood, and made changes to the parking and circulation within the site as reflected in the attached drawing. As evidenced by the neighborhood petition, it appears that Ms. Parry has done a thorough job of discussing this issue with the adjoining neighbors and soliciting their comments and approval of the sketch plan. I understand that Ms. Parry presented the petition and sketch plan to the City Council in their study session of November 2, and that members of the Council questioned whether the applicant was in agreement with the plan. I have reviewed the suggested changes with the property owner, and we find them to be acceptable. It appears that we will need to change one duplex lot to a single family lot, and create a lot for the existing house, as well as relocate the parking for the apartments, currently shown on the existing house location. If the proposed changes are acceptable to the City of Wheat Ridge, the applicant is willing to make changes in response to the neighbors' suggestions and to submit the necessary documents, including, if necessary a PRD application, to amend the approved subdivision, which would result in preserving the house. However, the construction of the improvements on the property must resume. We would delay as long as possible those items, such as the destruction of the house, and construction of the parking lots until the necessary hearings are held. As a result of the initiative of the City Council and the efforts of your office, we and the neighbors have been given the opportunity to work together to City of Wheat Ridge November 3, 1998 Page 3 come up with a mutually agreeable plan WHICH responds to the desires of the neighbors, recognizes the unique character of the neighborhood, and preserves the heritage of Wheat Ridge. I would like to have an opportunity to address the City Council on behalf of the applicant, at the earliest possible date, so that we can obtain a sense of the Council in response to this neighborhood initiative, which resulted from the Council's suggestion. Please confirm a date and format for going forward. We are under pressure to resume construction of the apartments, so time is of the essence. Sincerely, Alec Garbini a Sep-24-98 11:09 CM2 Garbini tl 303-239-8616 P.01 ~L 4c-Ti S~l'~rEl- 3+aYuw ur.~ I a~ Mp~ E NF # _ o +f N t ~*vL spuP-:--r N s m ~ o I ~S 17 + + I N rre+~d o l i _Siu1~G~ i,J Call ~'a~US~ a1~JV I,~~In n /oQre / (1~ O prvpq., 5 loo,- ~ ~Y F'2 ~ L ~ ~s 7 v n Say , fl P c ©r,~~ 32~4 Name: Address: Response: left message Boroos, Martin and Lois 7200 W. 31" Place yes Boyer, Grace 7200 W. 32' yes Brophy, Tom and Penny 3050 Teller yes Cassel, Jerry 3010 Saulsbury yes nd b 11 114 4z SQL Goins, Chad and Jennifer 7095 W. 32 L) Gross, Jon and Margaret 3040 Teller yes Hamilton, Lisa 7125 W. 32' LM Hess, G.L. and Evelyn 7240 W. 32nd yes Hirst, Ralph and Alexandra 3120 Saulsbury yes Holland, A.E. owns 3114 Teller ~QS L/ Howard, Joann 7260 W. 31" Place yes Johnson, John and Mike 7075 W.32nd yes King, Stephanie and Jay 7030 W. 32nd yes if apartment traffic can be split between Teller and Saulsbury Nordin, Carl 7203 W. 32nd LM Parry, Tom and Margaret 3060 Teller Street yes Q~ Slattery, Tom and Elaine 6869 W.32 nd / I ~r~ 6 ~w -tO ~ Trites, Al and Nona 7190 W. 29" Place yes fa S-Do . o e ~ea 7 Qe,,,~ ox t cc.n~ z 5'_ / B Van Scoyk, Jeff 7135 W.32°d yes Mf. / td~s 0- c~pac7 s~sl e. are sti Van Scoyk, Pershing and Mary 7193 W. 32"d yes a - yr~re Workmeister, Nancy 2996 Reed yes P " Yehle, Lynn owns 3160 Saulsbury yes if apartment traffic can be split d between Teller and Saulsbury, if not, prefers plan previously approved; wants screen of wall or trees along Saulsbury and driveway cuts so car lights do not shine directly into houses on east side of Saulsbury u Av Sj J'fa . i Jw1 SSSI 1° 1 'r '8 . Ig• ~.,~IF H i R--2 3 1 3 I i SI - g X Z; H 36TH Alt F h~ 1 $NII II JGS 1 8 .wl H M AW s 1 ^ ~I ~I I 1 H3 TM AN k l4D AVE. R Q2~6! H- 1313T P_ rg I Q~ x$ R R ~2 F R I $ R~ 1, R 3 R R % ly- °R V R. < ~ R S I R R N R ^ r LLJ ~ H~AN a If RY X 1 °r _ ~ SHR g aR ~l gR~RR _ r v ^ I ^ -H eoTU n~ R 5~ R R ^ Q ~ $ RI E S a II r ~4 $~-IR ^~~R g e ^ a 11n Is- II HATWARD ^ HAL I xl g i HALL ^ H ]Oi11 AN_ i I R-2 a ~=~UBa H -T AV 119 H H :mTM R J Protest Petition We, the undersigned property owners of Wheat Ridge, whose properties border on or are within approximately 100 feet of the property at 7110 West 32nd Avenue, protest the proposed redevelopment and rezoning of Saulsbury Properties, LLLP and Harold R. Smethill's property located at the above address which is currently known as the "Happy Landings Apartments." We oppose any redevelopment of these apartments or the adjacent stone house, caretaker's house or the attached vacant land which results in an increase in the number of housing units other than single family homes or duplexes and changes resulting in an increase in height of any or all of these housing units. Last Name First Name M.I. Street Address City Signature T c - cL c fYl l r• ICJ, ~l~ c ~~i z C -7 5-' ;Z4,:/Id= irl Ld - 4-0 3(o~~P u~ ~ 3oZ~ 5,.~ v~¢r 41C OAJ s 3~zS'S3+ccr6ucl di k opg A14. Z52o- w .3i~ ~u.~ ~y, ~J L GJA((RC~ ?07Sr.✓.3Z UN£4TXIlY-..f V S,19S,2 - - ,V\ C- M -7015UD3~ bo-l.s it _ (G II r - Q D B 762SW3(STJ Pl- WXEArRiac I certify that I personally witnessed each of the above property owners read, fill out and sign this form in my presence and that I signed this form in the presence of Notary Public. n Date: o2c~ 7 Signature: hQ~, Last Name First Name M.I. Street Address City Signature Protest Petition We, the undersigned property owners of Wheat Ridge, whose properties border on or are within approximately 100 feet of the property at 7110 West 32nd Avenue, protest the proposed redevelopment and rezoning of Saulsbury Properties, LLLP and Harold R. Smethill's property located at the above address which is currently known as the "Happy Landings Apartments." We oppose any redevelopment of these apartments or the adjacent stone house, caretaker's house or the attached vacant land which results in an increase in the number of housing units other than single family homes or duplexes and changes resulting in an increase in height of any or all of these housing units. I certify that I personally witnessed each of the above property owners read, fill out and sign this form in my presence and that 1 signed this form in the presence of Notary Public. Date: 7-aY-97 Signature: ~vux rf; ~~~J 4 '14-16 n /~1co,J , 0AW 10-26 9~ "A ~ *'j Owb/v Last Name First Name M.I. Street Address City Signature 0' - --7--- (~-u,~~ ate, City of Wheat Ridge Planning and Development Department Memorandum TO: Bob Middaugh, City Manager Alan White, Director of Planning and Development FROM: rMeredith Reckert, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Case No. MS-98-3/Smethills DATE: September 14, 1998 Pursuant to our conversation of September 11, 1998, please find attached a revised site plan for the Smethills project. The following are my comments regarding the revisions: -The house remains in place in addition to the 12 multi-family units currently under construction. The lot for the existing house is shown as 13,000 square feet in size. Technically, only 7500 square feet of area is required for a house in the R-3 zone, however the house lot is oversized to accommodate the garage and required setbacks. Staff recommends the lot be shown as 9000 square feet which will require the garage to be removed. -The southwestern duplex lot is reduced in size to 9000 square feet which will accommodate a single family dwelling. - The number of dwelling units accessing Teller Street is reduced from eight to two -Access for six of the multi-family units and the two duplex lots is from Saulsbury. A variance will be needed to allow over four units on a private drive. By splitting up the multi- family parking, existing trees will "break up" the parking on the southside of the apartments. -The 4500 square foot parkland dedication occurs on Teller Street and is split between R- 2 and R-3 zoning. This reduces the allowable R-3 density by another 2250 square feet bringing the R-3, multi-family lot to roughly 28,310 square feet in area (43,560 s.f. - 15,250 s.f. = 28,310 s.f) For the multi-family building, this computes to 2359 square feet of lot area for each unit or a density of 18 units per acre. As you know, our current standards are one multi-family unit for every 3630 square feet of land area or 12 units per acre in R-3. -If the house lot were reduced from 13,000 square feet to 9000 square feet, density would be 16 units per acre. This density is allowed under PRD zoning. There may be other issues which I haven't addressed in this memorandum. Please let me know if you need anything else. I- W,.3zrin av~ ij 1 I f ^ ,~drt ' N/. 3'I.rtp Av~• x K x x x x x x• k X ~ x -x ficuaY A.couurq, N x -~X _1 k -~k 11 A 0 eKIST wF siw~ ~a.«a v, 51F1Gt.Uc HoM~ 0 O ~2 ~ari-rniE*~ ur+~-rs JZ t4& 2 p2u ~ 4 rrs rr The City of 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80215-6713 (303) 234-5900 MTh eat City Admin. Fax # 234-5924 Police Dept. Fax # 235-2949 Ridge September 4, 1998 Mr. Harold Smethills Saulsbury Properties, L.L.C. 1546 Cole Boulevard, #227 Golden CC 80401 Dear Mr. Smethills: Since my last letter to you requesting that you consider saving the single family residence and reducing the scope of your project to nine multiple family units in your development at 32nd and Teller, I have been approached by a representative of the neighborhood offering another possibility for your consideration. If you are willing to alter your development concept to preserve the single family dwelling and to reduce the scope of construction of multiple family from twelve to nine units, the neighborhood would consider compensating you for the projected loss you might experience from reducing the scope of the project by three units. To my knowledge this is the first time that such an offer has been made to you, and as such, it is an offer that I would take seriously as a possible means of reconciling your development plans with concerns from adjoining property owners. I would be pleased to facilitate any discussion you would be willing to undertake regarding the concept of compensation for a reduction in the scope of your development. I appreciate that you are anxious to proceed with your development and as such, would make this a priority item to undertake as quickly as possible. Please let me know of any interest you have to consider this proposition and I will forward your response to the neighborhood representatives and to the members of the City Council as is appropriate. Sincerely, Robert C. Middaugh City Manager cc: Mayor and City Council C4 RECYCLED PAPER The City of 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80215-6713 (303) 234-5900 WHEAT AWh e at City Admin. Fax # 234-5924 Police Dept. Fax # 235-2949 GRi d ge August 31, 1998 GRETCHEN CERVENY, MAYOR Mr. Harold Smethills Saulsbury Properties, L.L.C. 1546 Cole Boulevard, #227 Golden CO 80401 Dear Mr. Smethills: RON PATERA WANDASANG CITY TREASURER CITY CLERK COUNCIL MEMBERS Dlstdct I Distnct III JERRY DITULLIO JANELLE SHAVER LLOYD A. DONNELLY DON EAFANTI DiMnct 11 Distda IV KEN SILER TERI DALSEC RALPH F. MANCINELLI CLAUDIA WORTH At the Monday, August 24, 1998 City Council meeting, the members of the City Council granted approval to a minor subdivision which you had submitted for property at 32nd Avenue and Teller Street in the City of Wheat Ridge. As you are aware, there was a considerable amount of neighborhood concern expressed about your proposed subdivision and resultant development that in spite of the approval granted, was shared by a significant number of the City Council members. Given the significant level of concern regarding potential development plans for your newly subdivided area, I have been asked by the City Council to request that you consider a development option for your property which would preserve the existing single family structure and provide for the construction of nine multiple family residential units adjacent to the single family structure. I fully appreciate that this request would necessitate a change in your plans for development of the property. If the City can in any way facilitate this request by expediting plan review or waiving any subsequent building fees, I would be pleased to do so. I would appreciate a response to this letter so that I may pass that information on to the members of the City Council. If I can provide you any additional information regarding this request, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Robert C. Middaugh City Manager cc: Mayor and pCity Council Ee t-x-cew~ 1-8.311 C~ RECYCLED PAPER 7500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215 Wheat Telephone 303/ 235-2846 Ridge FAX 303/235-2857 August-3111998 - ,:.Alec Garbini . CM2, Inc. 1546 Cole Boulevard Suite 227 Golden, Colorado 80401 Dear Alec: This letter is in regard to Case No. MS-98-3 which was approved by the Wheat Ridge City Council at .a public hearing held on August 24, 1998. A motion was made to approve the subdivision request for the following reasons: 1. Zoning on the property is R-2 and R-3. 2. A subdivision is required to allow development of the south half of the property. 3. All requirements of the Subdivision Regulations have been met. With the following conditions: 1. Note #6 be corrected to accurately reflect existing zoning (145' versus 165'). 2. A note be added that driveways for Lots 3 and 4 be at least 20' long from the edge of the private street. 3. A note be added that the access for Lots 3 and 4 be posted "no parking" for fire lane purposes. 4. A homeowners' association be formed to cover maintenance of the ditch and detention areaas with language on Exhibit `B' included as a plat note. 5. The City will accept a 5% land dedication in lieu of 5% of value of the land. 6. There be no major increase in the existing grade on the property when it is developed. 7. The drainage plan be changed to handle the drainage in a manner that all the drainage doesn't end up in one property. 8. Plat note #4 be changed to read: "Prior to the sale of any lot by the land owner, the land owner shall form a homeowners association and prepare and file of record covenants and conditions, in form and content approved by the City Attorney, guaranteeing the maintenance and upkeep of all common elements including, but not limited to private road, common drainage pond, interior sidewalks, parking lots, and the ditch. 9. The City Manager be directed to make one more contact with the property owner to see if he would be willing to build nine units and save the house. 10. The western most duplex on Teller have a shared access driveway on Lot 2. 11. In condition 2, strike the work "street" and replace it with "access way". 12. To amend Note 5 on the plat to add after new home construction " and impervious surface areas, with the further requirement that all such trees be replaced on a ,one to one basis". In regard to the issue of parkland dedication, the requirement for dedication is for 5% of the gross acreage which I have determined to be 4500 square feet (4499.7). In order to accommodate the dedication, the plat must be reconfigured. If the dedication occurs within the R-3 portion or is split between the R-2 and R-3 portions, then a corresponding number of apartment units must be given up. Section 4.E3. of the Subdivision Regulations offers an alternate scenario which allows the developer to acquire a substitute parcel of land of the required size within 3/4 of a mile of the proposed subdivision. I have spoken with the Director-of Parks and Recreation and he indicated that the City is desirous of acquiring more land adjacent to Stites Park located at the northwest comer of Newland Street and West 29th Avenue. I have concluded that this location would fall within the radius specified above with about a 1700' separation. -The approval process for dedication of the alternate parcel requires review by the Parks and Recreation Commission, Planning Commission and City Council for concurrence to parcel suitability and location. These reviews are not public hearings but would have to be reviewed by each entity on regularly scheduled business meeting dates. Agenda space is available on the September 16, 1.998, Parks and Recreation Commission meeting and the October 1, 1998, Planning Commission meeting. The City Council meeting would occur after the other two for a final decision. If the alternate location is acceptable, the land is purchased and title is transferred to the City by special warranty deed. Attached for reference purposes is a copy of the pertinent section of the Subdivision Regulations. If you would like to pursue the alternate course of action, please let me know as soon as possible. If you dedicate on-site, the plat document needs to be revised accordingly, along with the conditions approval specified above. Prior to preparation of the mylar for recording, please submit three copies of the revised subdivision plat for review. I will be out of the office from September 3 through September 8. If you have questions while I am out of town, feel free to contact Alan White at 235-2848. Sincerely, Meredith Reckert, AICP Senior Planner cc: Gary Wardle Paul Von Fay Harold Smethills 3. Subdividers shall dedicate five (5) percent of the gross _..acreage of their development for park,.parkland and recreation purposes. If the area being developed is not of a size sufficient for a park site, the subdivider shall pay five 5 percent fee based, upon the fair market value of the property being developed in lieu-.of the land dedication for park purposes. The Planning Com- mis'sion is of the opinion that such land dedication or fee in lieu thereof should be, and the same is hereby adopted. At the time an area is submitted for subdividing, the Planning -Department shall refer the preliminary plat to the Parks and Recrea- tion Commission and the Planning Commission for their recommendations to the City Council. The said commissions and the City Council in determining whether land shall be dedicated shall'consider the following; the size of the development and its adequacy.for accommo- dating a suitable park site; the park-and recreation aspects of the , City's comprehensive plan, existing parks in the area, and the topography, geology and location of land in the subdivision available for dedication and the needs of the people in the area.;~ In lieu of dedicating such area within the proposed subdivision, the subdivider may dedicate an. alternate parcel of the required size within 3/4 of a mile of the proposed subdivision which is acceptable to the City Council after a review and recommendation by the Parks and Recreation Commission and the Planning Commission based upon the standards and considerations 'as above set forth. If a site is accepted, such shall be free of 211 liens and encumbrances and shall be dedicated to the City of Wheat Ridge for parkland, park and recreation purposes. In the event a land dedication as above set forth is not approved, then a cash (contribution) in lieu of land dedication shall be required. The cash contribution shall be calculated, at the option of the subdivider, by one of the following methods: - 10-a - ~-r - a. Five (5) percent of the fair market value of the land as zoned for development; or, h. By the number of units to be developed in the proposed sub- division,at-the.rate.of 575.00 per unit. The case contribution shall be made prior to approval of the final plat.- The funds shall be separately accounted for and shall be used to acquire, if possible under the circumstances, parkland within 3/4 of a mile of the area being developed or for greenbelt purposes, parkland, park and recreation purposes. If the basis of calculation is five (5) percent of the fair market value, the City and the subdivider may agree upon the fair market value of the land or they may negotiate and select one appraiser mutually satisfactory or negotiate on any other basis suitable to both parties to determine the fair market value of the land, provided, however, that the subdivider shall be required to abide by the court's decision. The plat shail be approved once the court proceedings have been instituted to determine the fair mark=_t value of the land. If the land being subdivided is in the process of annexation, the subdivider shall meet City of Wheat Ridge standards according to pol- icies and guidelines on annexation as adopted by resolution, motion or ordinance by the City Council. In the event the land being subdivided has been annexed and as part of the annexation proceedings has been subject as a part thereof to a parkland contribution, or a cash payment in lieu thereof, or a dedi- cation for public purposes, then the requirements as herein set forth for lanC or cash in lieu of land shall be waived. SECTION FIVE: IMPROVEMENTS Engineering specifications for all improvements are to be specified by the City of Wheat Ridge Public Works Department. No improvements shall be made until all plans, profiles and speci- fications have been reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. - 19 - WHEAT RIDGE CF.' COUNCIL MINUTES: AUGUST 2 1998 PAGE -3- DRAFT Vote on Amendment to remove condition #3; failed 5-3 with Mrs. Dalbec, Mrs. Shaver and Mr. Eafanti voting yes. Original Motion carried 7-1 with Mr. DiTullio voting no Motion by Mrs Worth that Case No. WZ-98-15, a setback variance of 23 feet from the 30 foot minimum requirement for the erection of a freestanding freeway oriented sign seven feet from the property line, for property located at 9500 West 491h Avenue, be approved for the following reasons: 1. Approval of the variance, along with the Recommended Conditions of Approval, is not expected to cause a substantial negative impact to City services or residents. 2. Approval of the variance will not change the overall nature, intent or character of the approved PID or the Final Development Plan. 3. A hardship exists to the property associated with this case, being that significant physical constraints limit the visual access of this site compared to other similarly situated and zoned development projects along the highway corridor. Approval of the variance is subject to the following conditions: 1. Per the Public Works Department, sign placement shall meet the sight distance triangle requirements as specified in the City Code. 2. per the Police Department, the solid base of the sign shall be finished with an anti-graffiti sealant. 3. Should the applicant for this case, being Bolle Sunglasses, vacate their administrative office and/or any future retail operation occurring on this site, the subject sign and associated poles or supports will be completely removed from the premises; seconded by Mr. Eafanti; carried 7-1 with Mr. DiTullio voting no. Item 2. Approval of a four lot minor subdivision on property zoned R-2 and R-3 located at 3195 Saulsbury Street and 3190 Teller Street. (MS-98-03)(Saulsbury Properties) Mr. Mancinelli stated that he and Mr. Donnelly met and reviewed this Agenda Item, and declared no bias regarding this Item, as did Mr. Donnelly. Item 2. was introduced by Mr. DiTullio, who also read the title. Mrs. Worth stated that this Item is Quasi-Judicial and discussion should not be going on prior to a Public Hearing. Mr. Dahl answered Mrs. Worth and stated this type of meeting is not encouraged and Case Law states that there cannot be a bias. As a challenger to this meeting bias would have to be proved. Mrs. Worth asked Mr. Dahl to provide to Council an memorandum on how to handle Quasi-Judicial matters. Alec Garbini/Architect, 1546 Cole Blvd., Golden, was sworn in by the Mayor and presented the applicant's case. Meredith Reckert, Planner 11, was sworn in by the Mayor and gave the staff report. WHEAT RIDGE Cl- COUNCIL MINUTES: AUGUST 2 1998 PAGE -4- Mrs. Shaver disclosed that she had been contacted by a Mr. Tom Brophy about this case, he was concerned about traffic and parking. He also spoke to Mr. DiTullio about the same concerns. The following speakers were sworn in by the Mayor Tom Slattery, 6869 W. 32nd Avenue, feels it is stupid to put a 100-year drainage pit in a residential front yard This is an incompatible land use. He also requested that the two Councilpersons who discussed this case not vote. Margaret Parry, 3060 Teller Street, read a letter from Catherine Dunlap, 7160 West 30" Avenue, which urged Council to reject approval of this subdivision and send it back to the Planning commission so issues like exits, parking, increased traffic, drainage, etc. can be evaluated. Ms. Parry asked that this plan be approved with fewer units and to allow only 2 R- 2 lots with duplexes on them; asked for dedication_of land for a park.on this property. Asked that it go back to Planning Commission because of the many changes. She then showed slides of the area. JoAnne Howard, 7260 West 315` Place, has concerns about the additional driveways, traffic, parking, clapboard siding does not blend in with the surrounding neighborhood, density, tearing down the stone house. Lisa Hamilton-Fieldman, 7125 West 32"d Avenue, read a letter from Chad & Jennifer Goins, 7095 West 32nd Avenue, who were concerned about saving trees and would like to see this property become a park. Ms. Hamilton-Fieldman stated she appreciated the architect walking the property with the neighbors, but she still does not support the project. She also had drainage, density and traffic concerns and wonders if the intent to preserve the trees will actually be fulfilled in practice. Nona Triter is concerned about the constant moving of renters, unruly children, and increase in burglaries, and increased traffic; she would rather see patio homes that people own. She is also concerned about the low water pressure; doesn't want this project in her neighborhood. Mike Johnson, 7075 West 32nd Avenue; is in shock over the changes since the last meeting; didn't know the stone house was going to be razed; if this is approved, there will be big traffic increase, which is already a problem; can't stand the thought of the trees being cut down; Would like to see a park there; neighborhood can't support any more people. She opposes this project. Motion by Mr. Eafanti to suspend the Rules and go past 11;00 p.m. and finish the Agenda; seconded by Mrs. Worth. Mr. DiTullio asked for an amendment not to do Elected Officials' Matters; seconded by Mr. Siler; tied 4-4 with Councilmembers Donnelly, DiTullio, Shaver, and Mancinelli voting yes. Mayor broke the tie by voting yes. Amendment carried 5-4. Original Motion as amended carried 6-2 with Mrs. Shaver and Mrs. Worth voting no. WHEAT RIDGE Cl- COUNCIL MINUTES: AUGUST 1998 PAGE -5- Motion by Mr. DiTullio to go into Executive Session under Section 5.7(b)(1) of the Charter; seconded by Mr. Eafanti; carried 8-0. EXECUTIVE SESSION WAS HELD. -Motion by Mr. DiTullio that Case No. MS-98-3, a request for approval of a four lot minor - subdivision on property zoned R-2 and R-3 located at 3195 Saulsbury Street and 3190 Teller "Street, be denied for the following reasons: Subdivision does not satisfy requirements of Section '4. Design Standards; main paragraph, Section 8. paragraph 2, drainage and Section 3., noise; seconded by Mrs. Shaver; tied 4-4 with Councilmembers Shaver, DiTullio, Worth, and Dalbec voting yes. Mayor broke the tie by voting no. Motion failed 5-4. Motion by Mr. Siler that Case No. MS-98-3, a request for approval of a four lot minor _ subdivision on property zoned R-2 and R-3 located at 3195 Saulsbury Street and 3190 Teller Street, be:approved for the following reasons: 1. Zoning on the property is R-2 and R-3. 2. A subdivision is required to allow development of the south half of the property. 3. All requirements of the Subdivision Regulations have been met. With the following conditions: 1. Lot #6 be corrected to accurately reflect existing zoning (145' versus 165'). 2. A note be added that driveways for Lots 3 and 4 be at least 20' long from the edge of the private street. 3. A note be added that the access for Lots 3 and 4 be posted "no parking" for fire lane purposes. 4. A homeowners' association be formed to cover maintenance of the ditch and detention areas with language on Exhibit "B" included as a plat note; seconded by Mr. Donnelly. Motion by Mr. DiTullio to amend that the City will accept a 5% land dedication in lieu of 5% of value of the land; seconded by Mrs. Shaver; carried 7-1 with Mr. Mancinelli voting no. Motion by Mrs. Shaver to amend to add an additional condition that there be no major increase in the existing grade on the property when it is developed; seconded by Mrs. Worth; carried 8-0. Motion by Mrs. Dalbec to amend that the drainage plan be changed to handle the drainage in a manner that all the drainage doesn't end up in one property; seconded by Mrs. Worth; carried 7-1 with Mr. Siler voting no. Motion by Mrs. Shaver to change the plat note in attachment 4 to read: "Prior to the sale of any lot by the land owner, the land owner shall form a homeowners association and prepare and file of record covenants and conditions, in form and content approved by the City Attorney, guaranteeing the maintenance and upkeep of all common elements including, but not limited to private road, common drainage pond, interior sidewalks, parking lots, ditch"; seconded by Mrs. Worth; carried 8-0. Motion by Mr. DiTullio to amend that we direct the City Manager to make one more contact with the property owner to see if he would be willing to build 9 units and save the house; seconded by Mrs. Worth; carried 5-3 with Councilmembers Donnelly, Siler, and Mancinelli voting no. WHEAT RIDGE Cl- COUNCIL MINUTES: AUGUST 2 1998 PAGE -6- Motion by Mrs. Dalbec that the western most duplex on Teller have a shared access driveway for the duplexes on Lot 2; seconded by Mrs. Worth; carried 7-1 with Mr. Mancinelli voting no. Mr. Mancinelli asked that Mr. Siler accept a friendly amendment to condition 2 to strike the word "street" and replace it with "access way". This was accepted. Motion by Mrs. Worth to amend Note 5 on the plat to add after..new home construction "and impervious surface areas, with the further requirement that all such trees be replaced on a one to-one basis; seconded by Mr. DiTullio; carried 8-0. Vote on original motion as amended carried 5-3 with Councilmembers Shaver, DiTullio, and Worth voting no. .Item 3. Approval of an Amended Outline Development Plan and Preliminary and Final Development Plan on a portion of the site located at 3601 Wadsworth Blvd. (WZ-98-13)(Ches rown) (TO BE CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER 28, 1998) Item 3 was introduced by Mr. Eafanti; title read by the Clerk. Motion by Mr. Eafanti to reschedule Item 3 to September 28, 1998; seconded by Mrs. Worth; carried 8-0. DECISIONS. RESOLUTIONS. AND MOTIONS Item 4. Resolution 1670 - A Resolution in support of a ballot question permitting accelerated acquisition of Open Space. Item 4. was introduced by Mr. Donnelly, Clerk read title. Motion by Mr. Donnelly for approval of Resolution 1670; seconded by Mr. DiTullio. Motion by Mrs. Shaver for an amendment to add the wording, " BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Wheat Ridge City Council urges the Jefferson County Commissioners in their funding for debt service of the bonds to 1) Use a balanced approach for determining where debt service dollars come from. 2) Provide that revenues for debt service come from project type funds i.e. acquisition,. development, trails and joint venture projects and not from funds used for fixed expenditures i.e. administration and maintenance. 3) Not limit the funding of the debt service to use of existing acquisition revenues; seconded by Mrs. Worth; failed 2-6 with Mrs. Shaver and Mrs. Worth voting yes. Original Motion carried 8-0. HAPPY LANDINGS SUBDIVISION A REPLAT OF THE NORTH 3/4 OF THE NORTH 3/5 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF LOT 1, BLOCK 2 BARTH'S SUBDIVISION A SUBDIVISION IN THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO FINAL PLAT MAYOR'S CERTIFICATE DEDICATION Saulsbury Properties LLLP, being the owner(s) of the real property of 2.042 acres described as follows: NORM 3/4 OF THE NORM 3/5 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF LOT 1 BLACK L SAWS SuBOEVRNIH COUNTY OF JEfiERSON, STATE OF COLORADO STATE OF COLORADO) COUNTY OF JEFFERSON) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of A.D. 19_, by Witness my hand arM official seat. My Commission expires _ Notary Public OWNERS SAULSBURY PROPERTIES,LLLP, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CORPORATION BY: HAROLD R. SMED!ILLS, MANAGING PARTNER 1546 COLE BOULEVARD SUITE 227 GOLDEN, COLORADO 00401 (303) 233-3447 THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS OAT OF . 1997 BY AS OF SAULSBURY PROPERTIES, I.I.I.P. A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CORPORATION. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL NOTARY PUBLIC CASE HISTQRY MS-98-3 YN Aanw ~ SITE ~ a B g ~ axw Mane 4 S gem Awxw. Me, A.. ZOM A- 3 ~ m - e VICINITY MAP NOTES 1,) THE EMERGENCY AND SERVICE VEHICLE ACCESS EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED BY THE OWNER AND SUBSEQUENT OWNERS, HEIRS, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. IN THE EVENT THAT SUCH CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE IS NOT PERFORMED BY SAID OWNER, THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO ENTER SUCH EASEMENTS AND PERFORM NECESSARY WORK, THE COST OF WHICH SAID OWNER, HEIRS, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS AGREES TO PAY UPON BILLING. 2.) THE STORM DETENTION AREA SHOWN ON THE APPROVED DRAINAGE PLAN SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED BY THE OWNER AND SUBSEQUENT OWNERS, HEIRS, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. IN THE EVENT THAT SUCH CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE IS NOT PERFORMED BY SAID OWNER, THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO ENTER SUCH AREA AND PERFORM NECESSARY WORK, THE COST OF WHICH SAID OWNER, HEIRS, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS AGREES TO PAY UPON BILLING. NO BUILDING OR STRUCTURE WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE DETENTION AREA AND NO CHANGES OR ALTERATIONS AFFECTING THE HYDRAULIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DETENTION AREA WILL BE MADE WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER. 3.) THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LIES IN FLOOD HAZARD ZONE C - AREA OF MINIMAL FLOODING. 4.) THE UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN ARE DEDICATED FOR THE INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, AND REPLACEMENT OF ELECTRIC, GAS, TELEVISION CABLE, AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES. UTILITIES SHALL ALSO BE PERMITTED WITHIN ANY ACCESS EASEMENTS AND PRIVATE STREETS IN THE SUBDIVISION. PERMANENT STRUCTURES AND WATER METERS SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED WITHIN SAID UTIUTY EASEMENTS. S) PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OF ANY TREE SHOWN ON THE FACE OF THIS PLAT, APPROVAL MUST BE RECEIVED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUNNING AND DEVELOPMENT. REMOVAL OF THESE MATURE TREES WILL BE ALLOWED ONLY WHEN IN DIRECT CONFLICT WITH A BUILDING FOOTPRINT PROPOSED WITH NEW HOME CONSTRUCTION. 6.) THE NORTH 165' OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ZONED R-3. THE REMAINDER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ZONED R-2. NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE (3) YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED UPON MORE THAN TEN (10) YEARS FROM THE DALE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. C.R.S.13-80-105(3)(a). BOOK PAGE RECEPTION NO. DATE The foregoing plat is appraved for filing; and conveyance of the streets/roads, as and easements is acceptable by the Cify of Wheat Ridge County State of Colorado, this _ day of 19_. The Count ny shall undertake maintenance of any such streets roads and public ways only after costruction thereof has been satisfactorily completed by the developer and accepted by the City of Wheat Ridge. Attest: City Clerk City Seal PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATE Thls is to certify the within of has been approved by the Commission of he City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado. APPROVALS: Chairmen A Public Service Company of Colorado US West Communications Group, Inc. City of Wheat Ridge Director of Public Works City of Wheat Ridge Director of Parks and Recreation Commission City of Wheat Ridge Director of Planning and Development City of Wheat Ridge City Engineer Rocky Mountain Water Company SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE AUG 17 '"o RF-CE`'','tU A 1, Kenneth A. Perry a Registered Land Surveyor in the State of Colorado, do hereby certify that the survey of Happy Landings $ubdivision was made by me or directly under my supervision on or about the day a 19 and that the accompanying plat accurately and properly shows said subdivision and the survey Thereof. Kenneth A.Pe ry r Registered C ry do Land Surveyor Colorado Number 25961 Date____ _ CL€RK AND RECORDERS CERTIFICATE ACCEPTED FOR I'll IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, AT GOLDEN, COLORADO, ON THIS DAY OF , 1997 AT O'CLOCK -.M. PLAT BOOK , PAGE NO. RECEPTION NO. UNDER CLERK AND RECORDER DEPUTY CLERK Cry. Holder of deed(s) of trust hereby releases claim to areas dedicated to public use. HAPPY LANDING'S SUBDIVISION A REPLAT OF THE NORTH 3/4 OF THE NORTH 3/5 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF LOT 1, BLOCK 2 BARTH'S SUBDIVISION A SUBDIVISION IN THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO FINAL PLAT /UD EL F-2 WEST 31ST PLACE a 40' ROW B =:I II III, ~ III el II II c~ _ - - VIII I III l I II I III w' Lj IIIN~ uD~ llll~l III WI Ill~~ Cr" I L3C `L Il~,d III ~ 7,C) 7 II I I! _ --'ter I ~I II I II I.,",1 ~L:_I;k: l fhi fh:'`:. 1[ 11:~:`u'P• CASE HISTORY MS-98-3 - - - - - - - - 32ND AVENUE 60' RDW ~EIEM'G 7~¢ 4 6 lera _ _ _ t - - - - - - - - - / NOR1H LINE OF LOT 1. BLOCK 2Z BA`RTH•S SUBDIVISION t~,i a wtt@rw°s°`amm¢'~ . PsnT TYP. 90T)4'4E ~9'S5'tY1 1]0 31222 Tjypy __~4e DITCH EASENENTT ~ 18143 I ~ pT!°'9 I m I i m n F=SICK -)4 Tri'~ <G.' I I4?u 3 93.580: OS0.1 U. i ° R-3 N1uL-rl-FAMILY APARTMENTS I o ,0.00• 9222 - - r - 20.0C m_ I I I 1 I I m, 1 l I~ I 1 ; - „o.oq- - NONE%CI119VE U71LITY W111EN' EASE,9ENT ° - f R MULTI-FAMILY N./I I~/;PE,,'„ I { ~ 4 1.1 1 LOT 2 1 LOT 3 I I° LOT 4 13284.99 SO. M t 15833.28 S0. M. 3 15828.24 S0. T. t I m 5' I I I I I< I ~ uty bsbaNr i I l I i { I III sETBAOKS I I {Jl~ 92.22' oeo' J I L--10~1SNT1')=A .IiIFA~1-_ L - 110. 110.00' J ww 92.22' O (TYP.) _ 1 00' 3l].22' sls9v ~ II Li ~ II I 1~~1lI. ~ of 1 ~ X11 ~~l!I IN 'II I if if I II I,I I II I I~ I III ;i IIi II I II I 01st vs m w ~u~wx~szc~-s' mmwT a~ or :zn-scs m°°'mi.:.x°Ys w a nwwc CHERRY -4,` !41~ 1 BOOKPAGE RECEPTION NO. DATE LEGEND OO TREE O FOUND PIN & CAP, LS 14112 GRAMIC SCALE c>a~1) 1 bmh ~ 80 R m C1) Ql r ti ti n Q c E 3 T3 d L U / !n 01 c a C J T n n m N a I Ell w- I I ( I I I I. I I i ~ ~ ~ ~ dSPHA[FiARY➢dG ~ li 3PACET . W 1 ~ " _ I Li ~I i E DETQ$.,SHRTB cz o 77N L7 HI L7 I _ LLJ :I IJ. J _ J /S, I Lj 0 I~ I _ /EST 31ST PL' ~ r 4 C C~. . ,,ACHEo RBEW.LMENT3 TELLER STREE( [ 1 FFE = 5469 00 Id ' . I I FFE = 5469.50- NEW nwIIT''_ LTKC PeweE 1• i _ 32ND AVENUE GO' ROW Y/6b6 _ _ _ 1 el i W4~ e Z k P ~ V t R 3LlC 2• BPRTH S SNBDIVISmN-: „t _ bz b " • 9~j /6 _ N pUG 1 -7 i s 4- a ~"OF SMa: orw-_ ~g~ W ~w n ZJ 3 III - 88w sUDEWAL I I El: 467.80 3k I r4 1 SEE DETAIL SgEUS GRAPHIC SCALE PRTXAIE ACCESS DRT i ( I: a a E k I t fotla n EO R I i I ; I I11. 1 Id li p O O O 110' co .__ID rl 300' 1 rD i In 1.0 1'_i'.. II II i I i II w w I I ZAP 0 pWp [l lpp PA42 ~ac°u JiJma m CWOPP Q~VnP. f7Z~X QNOpX W F~ MR, us N 2m J x cf) z w z Q Q Q cl) C) V o ` J 'F- t.l.. V J CL_ p SEE DETAIL ZEETS I _ Rbl%A N R CIT W Wf T RIDGE I AILS SSG SYIRT INPRRVE w. PIANS p I-Z LEGEND c f a U0 E r I WATER EXISTING WATER LINE S E BETA SHEETS 5?~'y II C Au• CHAISEi I~ - - - rVER - EXISTING WATER CCNBUIT w u EXISTING HTDP.ANT I w I i ! $J EXISTING GATE VALVE REVISIONS i 1 "11-ARY- EXISTING SANITARY SEWER - I i 1 - I I II '-'srxl:------- EXISTING STDRM SEVER III I PER 1 - III 11111 ..................{j_____-- EXISTING MANHOLE - - III EXISTING INLET IY I EXISTING GAS MAIN --------E EXISTING ELECTRIC DATE 7,2111998 EXISTING TCI_EPHENE DESIGN:PR'F EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER 06-071093 NEW CURB AND GUTTER CI.DWG NEW CURB AND GUTTER (SPILL) SHEET N0: NEW ASPHALT PAVEMENT 1 OF 1 SHEETS . r'Au= r X PUBLIC HEARINGS PROC./CEREMONIES BIDS/MOTIONS INFORMATION ONLY QUASI-JUDICIAL . X Yes No CITY ADM. MATTERS CITY ATTY. MATTERS LIQUOR HEARINGS PUBLIC COMMENT RESOLUTIONS MS-98-031Saulsbury Properties Approval of a four lot minor subdivision on property zoned R-2 and R-3 located at 3195 Saulsbury Street and 3190 Teller Street. ATTACHMENTS: BUDGETED ITEM: Yes No WM 021999HNAE US 1 104 01 ON' two 1'. Zoning on the property is R-2 and R-3. 2. A subdivision is required to allow development of the south half of the property. I All requirements of the Subdivision Regulations have been met. I . Note #6 be corrected to accurately reflect existing zoning (145' versus 165). 2. A notebe added that driveways for Lots 3 and 4 beat least 20'long from the edge of theprivate street. 3, A note be added that the access for Lots 3 and 4 by posted 'no parking' for fire lane purposes, 4. A homeowners' association be formed to cover maintenance of the ditch and detention areas with language on Exhibit 'B' included as a plat note. C:\Barbara'tC,CRPTS\jiis9803cover,wpd CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO: City Council DATE OF MEETING: CASE NO. & NAME: ACTION REQUESTED: LOCATION OF REQUEST: August 24, 1998 DATE PREPARED: August 17, 1998 MS-98-3/Saulsbury Properties CASE MANAGER: M. Reckert Approval of a four-lot minor subdivision 3195 Saulsbury Street/3190 Teller Street NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT(S): NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER(S) APPROXIMATE AREA: PRESENT ZONING: PRESENT LAND USE: SURROUNDING ZONING: SURROUNDING LAND USE: DATE PUBLISHED: DATE POSTED: DATED LEGAL NOTICES SENT: ENTER INTO RECORD: Q COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (X) ZONING ORDINANCE (X) SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS O OTHER Alec Garbini CM2 Management 1547 Cole Blvd. Golden, CO Saulsbury Properties, LLC 1546 Cole Blvd., #227 Golden, CO 80401 2.042 acres R-2 and R-3 Single Family, Multi-family, vacant N, S, E: R-2; W: R-2, R-1A N, S, E and W: Low Density Residential August 7, 1998 August 7, 1998 August 4, 1998 (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS O SLIDES (X) EXHIBITS JURISDICTION: The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. L REQUEST The applicant requests approval of a four-lot minor subdivision on property located at 3195 Saulsbury Street/3190 Teller Street. The property is split-zoned with R-3 on the north half and R-2 on the south half. The zone break line falls roughly 145' south of the north property line. II. CASE HISTORY The property in question was subject to a zone change request from R-2 and R-3 to Planned Residential Development per Case No. WZ-97-1. This application was made on December 18, 1996, but was never forwarded to Planning Commission or City Council for public hearing. On February 22, 1997, Ordinance No. 1066 became effective which placed a moratorium on zone change applications for rezonings to R-2, R-3, R-3A, R-2A and PRD zones. City Council then passed a series of ordinances in the fall of 1997 which reduced the allowable densities in the R-2A, R-3, R-3A and PRD zone districts. The application for Case No. WZ-97-1 was subsequently withdrawn. In May of 1998, the owner applied for and was granted a building permit for the construction of 12 multi-family units for the northern portion of the property zoned R-3. Staff would note that the multi- family units under construction are consistent with the density established pursuant to Ordinance No. 1090. However, because of the density limitations, the existing single family home on the northwest corner of the property must be removed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the new multi-family units. The owner has now applied for approval of a subdivision to plat the southern portion zoned R-2 into three duplex sites. A site plan for development is included as Attachment 3. The design for the multi-family portion has been altered somewhat since Planning Commission review as the site plan reviewed by the Planning Commission had zoning violations. The site plan shown as Attachment 3 has been revised to comply with zoning code. Attachment 4 is a letter received regarding the request. III. AGENCY REFERRALS All outside service agencies can serve the property with improvements paid for at the developer's expense. Public Service Company has requested specific language which has been included as note #4. Consolidated Mutual Water Company will require the looping of a water mainline between Teller and Saulsbury Streets within a 30' wide easement. City Council Page 2 MS-98-03/Saulsbury Properties Wheat Ridge Fire Protection District will require a fire hydrant to be installed at the southeast corner of Lot 1 just north of the entrance drive to the duplexes on Saulsbury. An additional hydrant is required on Teller adjacent to the multi-family drive. Wheat Ridge Public Works Department has commented relative to the technical elements of the plat. Public improvements will be required to be constructed along the Teller and Saulsbury Street frontages A drainage report for the subdivision is in the process of being reviewed. The Parks and Recreation Commission has requested a 5% land value contribution in lieu of land dedication. IV. SUBDIVISION DESIGN The proposed four-lot minor subdivision will allow the multi-family structure with associated parking which is currently under construction to be contained within Lot 1. Lots 2, 3, and 4 fall within the R-2 zoned portion and are being proposed as duplex sites. Access to the eastern two duplexes (lots 3 and 4) is by way of a 25' wide ingress/egress easement to Saulsbury. Access to Lot 2 is from Teller Street. A 30' wide easement is imposed over the duplex private drive for water line looping. Access to all four lots is in compliance with City codes. A 5' right-of-way dedication will occur for Saulsbury Street. A signature block for the Rocky Mountain Water Company has been provided on the first sheet. The applicant will not be enclosing the ditch. The ditch company has concurred. All trees over F in diameter in size which are in good health have been shown on the document with a note (45) prohibiting their removal. The applicant's representative worked with the City Forester to evaluate the health of the trees to be saved. Staff would note that the setbacks for the duplexes will be measured from the lot line, not the easement line. Staff would recommend that driveways accessing the easement must be 20' in depth to allow parking in front of garages. This should be included as a note on the front sheet. Attachment 5 contains language regarding maintenance of common elements such as drainage easements. This should be incorporated as a plat note. Attachment 6 is an explanation of why the drainage system was designed to flow to the southeast rather than to the north to the storm sewer in 32"d Avenue. All requirements of the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Code have been met. City Council Page 3 MS-98-03/Saulsbury Properties V. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Planning,Commission reviewed this request at a public hearing held on June 18, 1998. A recommendation for APPROVAL was made for the following reasons: Zoning on the property is R-2 and R-3. A subdivision is required to allow development of the south half of the property. All requirements of the Subdivision Regulations have been met. With the following conditions: 1. Note #6 on the front page be corrected to accurately reflect existing zoning (150 feet versus 165 feet.) 2. A note be added that no perimeter fencing is allowed along the eastern side of Lot 1 on Saulsbury Street. 3. The private street/access way be posted "no parking" for fire lane purposes. 4. A note be added that the access way be posted as a fire lane and that property owners are responsible for maintenance. 5. A note be added to the front page that driveways for Lots 2, 3 and 4 be at least 20 feet long from the southern edge of the private street. 6. That a homeowners association be formed to cover maintenance of the private street, ditch and detention areas. 7. That the private street be blocked by a gate on the western end adjacent to Teller Street and that the parking on Teller adjacent to the private street be posted as `no parking'. 8. That the plan be revised to devise a plan for continuing the ditch flow and provide diversion boxes for all nearby residents who have ditch rights, and that existing ditch be maintained. 9. That a hammerhead turnaround be installed at the end of the private street as approved by the Public Works Department. 10. A line should be clearly delineated on the plan showing the division between R-2 and R-3 properties. Based on administrative site plan modification, note numbers 2, 7 and 9 are no longer applicable. In regard to condition number 1, the zoning line is closer to 145' south and, therefore, this condition must be adjusted. VI. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION Staff has concluded that zoning on the property is R-2 and R-3 and that a subdivision is required to allow construction on the southern (R-2) portion. Staff further concludes that all requirements of the Zoning Code and Subdivision Regulations have been met and, therefore, a recommendation of APPROVAL is given with the following conditions: City Council Page 4 MS-98-0j/Saulsbury Properties I . Note #6 be corrected to accurately reflect existing zoning (145' versus 165'). 2. A note be added that driveways for Lots 3 and 4 be at least 20' long from the edge of the private street. 3. A note be added that the access for Lots 3 and 4 by posted `no parking' for fire lane purposes. 4. A homeowners' association be formed to cover maintenance of the ditch and detention areas with language on Attachment 5 included as a plat note. VII. RECOMMENDED MOTIONS Option A: "I move that Case No. MS-98-3, a request for approval of a four lot minor subdivision on property zoned R-2 and R-3 located at 3195 Saulsbury Street and 3190 Teller Street, be APPROVED for the following reasons: 1. Zoning on the property is R-2 and R-3. 2. A subdivision is required to allow development of the south half of the property. 3. All requirements of the Subdivision Regulations have been met. With the following conditions: Note 46 be corrected to accurately reflect existing zoning (145' versus 165'). A note be added that driveways for Lots 3 and 4 be at least 20' long from the edge of the private street. A note be added that the access for Lots 3 and 4 by posted `no parking' for fire lane purposes. 4. A homeowners' association be formed to cover maintenance of the ditch and detention areas with language on Attachment 5 included as a plat note. Option 13:1 move that Case No. MS-98-3, a request for approval of a four lot minor subdivision on property zoned R-2 and R-3 located at 3195 Saulsbury Street and 3190 Teller Street be DENIED for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3." C:\B.b .\CCRPTS\MS983SR.WPD City Council Page 5 MS-98-03/Saulsbury Properties N 35TH AV 1\-2 W HAYWARD 3 PARK > ; CITY z HALL R-2 S f h Ft~L Jm Y R $ S o & g _ 101 n i l 13 $ - - S e R A W. 3010 AWL I i i I Ph 8 ~ .8 1 gg 2 g R R W 1 ~ R R R S ~ EI §II M RI 1 nll 9 9II L 1 3'!iM hVE. rv a~ H7-0TNR ~ ~ ~L .o a 3 K2 rv N E _ B $ o_ n rv L-L With the following condition: That the fire hydrant requested by the Arvada Fire District be placed no later than after the foundation has been constructed. The motion passed by a vote of 7-0. (Chair THOMPSON declared a recess at 8:20 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 8:30 p.m.) C. Case No. MS-98-03: A request by Saulsbury Properties for approval of a minor subdivision of four lots for residential apartments and duplexes. Said property is located at 3195 Saulsbury Street. Meredith Reckert distributed copies of the following exhibits which were then entered into the record and accepted by Chair THOMPSON: Exhibit A: Letter dated June 9, 1998 from Lynn Yehle, 1235 Everett Court, Lakewood, expressing his desire to see the subject property rezoned to single family residence and that all vegetation on the subject property between 32nd Avenue and the ditch be preserved. Exhibit B: Site and grading plan for Happy Landings Apartments. Ms. Reckert presented slides and overhead projections of the subject property. She entered the zoning ordinance, subdivision regulations, case file, packet materials and exhibits into the record which were accepted by Chair THOMPSON. She informed that the property was within the City of Wheat Ridge, that all notification and posting requirements had been met and there was jurisdiction to hear the case. Ms. Reckert informed that the applicant was requesting approval of a four-lot minor subdivision on the subject property which is split-zoned R-3 on the north half and R-2 on the south half. She presented a history of the case and informed that the property was formerly subject to a zone change request from R-2 and R-3 to Planned Residential Development (Case No. WZ-97-1). The application, a request to construct sixteen multi-family units, six duplex units and two single family lots was made on December 18, 1996, but was never forwarded to Planning Commission or City Council for public hearing. On February 22, 1997, Ordinance No. 1066 became effective which placed a moratorium on rezone applications to R-2, R-3, R-3A, R-2A and PRD zones. A series of ordinances were passed in the fall of 1997 which reduced the densities in R-3 from 21 units per acre to 12 units per acre. She informed that the application was subsequently withdrawn. Ms. Reckert stated that in May of 1998 the owner applied for and was granted a building permit for the construction of twelve multi-family units on the property zoned R-3 which was consistent with density established by Ordinance No. 1090. She informed that if the Planning 06/18/98 Page 6 ATTACHMENT 2 single family residence stays on the property, the buildable density for multi-family units would be reduced to nine units. She stated that the applicant had applied for approval of a subdivision to plat the southern portion (zoned R-2) into three duplex sites. Ms. Reckert reviewed the agency referrals and informed that all outside service agencies could serve the property with improvements paid for by the developer. She informed that Consolidated Mutual Water Company would require looping of a water main line between Teller and Saulsbury within the thirty-foot access way (private street); that the Wheat Ridge Fire Protection District would require a fire hydrant to be installed at the southwest corner and would not allow perimeter fencing to occur along the eastern side of Lot 1; and that Public Service requirements would have to be met. She informed that the Wheat Ridge Public Works Department required improvements to be constructed along the Teller and Saulsbury Street frontages, and that a drainage report was in the review process. She advised that the Parks and Recreation Commission had requested a 5% land value contribution in lieu of land dedication. Ms. Reckert reviewed the subdivision design. A common drive/private street would provide access to all four lots by way of a 30-foot easement located on the northern 24-foot portion of the R-2 lots and the southern six feet of Lot l and the access way had not been used to calculate allowable density. The utility easement/private street would span between Teller and Saulsbury. The Teller Street entrance would be gated for emergency access only with no parking allowed, and maintenance of the drive area would be responsibility of property owners. A 5-foot right-of-way dedication occurs along Saulsbury Street. All trees over one foot diameter which are in good health have been shown on the face of the plat and cannot be removed without review and approval of the City. The City Forester has worked with the applicant to evaluate health of trees on the property. The setback for duplex units would be measured from the property line and it was recommended that driveways and setbacks be at least twenty feet on the southern edge of the access way so off street parking would be assured. Ms. Reckert informed that it was staff s conclusion that a subdivision is required to allow construction on the southern R-2 portion of the property and that the private street/access way would be the best option available for internal access. Since all requirements for the Subdivision Regulations had been met, recommendation for approval was given with the following conditions: 1. Note #6 be corrected to accurately reflect existing zoning (150' vs. 165') 2. A note be added that no perimeter fencing be allowed along the eastern side of Lot 1 for fire protection purposes. 3. The private street/access way be posted "no parking" for fire lane purposes and maintained by the owners within the subdivision. 4. A note be added that driveways for Lots 2, 3, and 4 be at least 20 feet long from the southern edge of the private street. Planning Commission Page 7 06/18/98 Commissioner SNOW expressed concern about maintenance of the private street if any of the duplexes or apartments were to be sold. Ms. Reckert replied that it would be appropriate for the Commission to require a homeowners association with protective covenants which would ensure maintenance of the roadway. Chair THOMPSON expressed concern about guest parking for duplexes. Ms. Reckert informed that the building permit required at least three guest spaces for the multi-family units which is consistent with code. She noted that there was no guest parking requirement for single family residences. Commissioners BRINKMAN and GOKEY discussed sidewalks for the development. Ms. Reckert advised that the building permit required sidewalks to be installed on both frontages. Commissioner BRINKMAN expressed concern about dead-end sidewalks. Commissioner GOKEY asked if the sidewalks would be consistent with ADA requirements. Mr. Goebel replied that they would meet the ADA standards. Commissioner COLLINS asked about the fence along 32nd Avenue. Mr. Goebel informed that some residents have expressed concern about sight distance as they are pulling out onto 32nd Avenue and the City is requesting that the fence be moved back onto the property line. Commissioner GOKEY asked if a neighborhood meeting had been held concerning this development. Ms. Reckert replied that neighborhood meetings were not required for subdivisions. Chair THOMPSON asked about irrigation ditch. Mr. Goebel replied that it would remain open with a 4-foot chain link fence at the top between the ditch and the multi-family units. In response to a question from Commissioner BRINKMAN, Mr. Goebel replied that a traffic light for the entrance would not be required. Commissioner COLLINS asked about the retention pond. Mr. Goebel replied that the design is required to retain a 100-year storm. The applicant addressed the Commission. Alec Garbini 1546 Cole Boulevard, Suite #227, Golden Mr. Garbini was sworn by Chair THOMPSON. He stated that he was the architect for the project and was appearing on behalf of Saulsbury Properties who originally planned to remodel the existing converted horse stall apartments but have now decided to replace them with the present plan. He informed that the applicant planned to save as many of the trees as possible and that the plan would allow more open space than presently exists. He submitted plans and elevations for the buildings for the Commission to review. These plans were then Planning Commission Page 8 06/18/98 offered to members of the audience who wished to review them. He stated there is no access planned onto 32nd Avenue and that there would be an emergency gate at the end of the 24- foot wide private street which would allow fire trucks to break through in case of emergency. He commented that trash trucks could be given a key to the gate by the manager allowing them to drive through , or a hammerhead configuration could be constructed. In reference to guest parking, he stated that the duplexes have a two-car garage design with one parking space in front of each duplex which would provide three parking spaces for each duplex which was in excess of the requirements. He stated there would be an extension of the white picket fence the entire length of the property and that a new sidewalk would be installed on Saulsbury that would connect to 32nd Avenue. In reply to a question from Commissioner GOKEY, Mr. Garbini replied that each multi- family unit will have two bedrooms and the duplexes would average three bedrooms. Commissioner GOKEY asked about the well on the site. Mr. Garbini replied that it was an adjudicated well that would be used in conjunction with ditch rights to irrigate the lawns and landscaping on the property. THOMPSON expressed concern regarding children's safety with large vehicles such as moving vans having to back out 300 feet to get from Teller to Saulsbury. Mr. Garbini replied that the gate could be used in such instances. He commented that the gate is to be installed to satisfy neighborhood concerns that it not be a through street. Mr. Garbini replied to Commissioner SNOW's concern about maintenance of the street if the property were sold and stated that a homeowners association would be formed and new owners would be subject to the covenants and maintenance agreement of the association. During discussion of parking, Ms. Reckert suggested that parking restrictions for RV, trailer and boats could be instituted. The applicant was agreeable to this. Commissioner BRINKMAN asked about curb, gutters and sidewalks. Mr. Garbini replied that they are required to extend the sidewalk for the apartments and would like to end the sidewalk at the point where the private street enters back into the property rather than extending it to a dead-end. Ms. Reckert advised that only City Council has the authority to waive curb, gutter and sidewalk requirements. During discussion on drainage, Mr. Garbini advised that the engineers for the project have concluded that, even with paving and improvements on the site, there will be less water leaving the site than is presently the case. The following individuals were signed up to speak before the Commission: Thomas Slattery 6869 West 32nd Avenue Planning Commission Page 9 06/18/98 Mr. Slattery was sworn by Chair THOMPSON. Mr. Slattery questioned the legality of the R-3 zone designation. He commented that, since no construction was occurring on the property, that it was misleading to indicate that there would be a hardship to the applicant if subdivision was not granted. He expressed concern that Lot 4 would not be buildable with. the required drainage easement. He did not believe the development fit in with the established character of the neighborhood and believed there was a precedent for denial of any R-3 use in the area because an application made in the 1980's was denied by City Council on the basis of incompatibility with the neighborhood. He did not believe that the developer had proven conformance with the zoning and subdivision code and asked that the request be denied. Discussion followed. Mr. Slattery felt that if the units were to be sold, single ownership would no longer exist. Commissioner GOKEY asked Mr. Garbini if the property were owned by one individual at this time and if development would be by one individual. Mr. Garbini replied that this was the case and, if sold, the property would be subject to covenants set forth in the homeowners association and responsible for all improvements. Ms. Reckert commented that the homeowners association would be responsible for maintenance of the detention area. Commissioner BRINKMAN referred to the subdivision regulations that require drainage areas to be left in a natural state with no encroachments on the natural channel areas and requiring that any land subject to a 100-year flood should not be platted for occupancy unless adequate provisions were made to eliminate and control flood hazards as they apply to area being developed. She also clarified that the R-3 property was not being addressed at this meeting other than where it directly affects the R-2 subdivision request. Commissioner SNOW commented that the applicant already has the building permit. Mr. Slattery felt the building permit was not legal. Lisa Hamilton Fieldman 7125 West 32nd Avenue Ms. Fieldman was sworn by Chair THOMPSON. She expressed concern about losing trees on the property. She did not believe the Lot 4 would be buildable with the drainage easement. She asked the reason for the single family residence on the property being up for rent when the applicant had indicated it would be torn down after being used for a construction office. She expressed concern about parking and increased traffic which would be generated by the development. In regard to the gate, she suggested that the end of the street be widened to more than 30 feet, and that the street be placed around a traffic island which would allow delivery trucks, etc. to turn around. Chair THOMPSON asked if the detention pond area could be used for play structures, trees, etc. Meredith Reckert replied restrictions on the plat would not allow that to occur. During discussion of the retention pond, Mr. Goebel stated that the exact size of the grass Planning Commission - Page 10 06/18/98 pond would not be determined until final drainage review was completed. Commissioner GOKEY asked if the structure on lot 4 would be in danger of a 100 year storm. Mr. Goebel replied that they are working to allow more space between the structure and the pond to ensure that the structure would not be in danger. Catherine Dunlap 7160 West 30th Ms. Dunlap was sworn by Chair THOMPSON. She stated that there is no storm sewer system in the area at all and a large pool of water forms at 30th and Saulsbury and stays for several days. She expressed concern that there would be no traffic light at the entrance to the unit from Saulsbury. She also expressed concern about car lights shining into neighbors windows as they enter and exit the development as well as increased traffic flow in the area which would be generated by the development. She was concerned about the possibility of lowering water tables for neighborhood wells if the developer used his well for irrigation. She was also concerned about the possibility of decreased public water pressure which is already low in the area. She stated her opposition to building an apartment complex in the middle of low density housing and expressed her opinion that the developer didn't care about the neighborhood but was only interested in making money. Commissioner SNOW commented that the only decision that was before the Commission was to decide how to subdivide the land. She asked Ms. Dunlap if she had any suggestions about the traffic. Ms. Dunlap felt that it would be the best plan to exit onto 32nd Avenue. She indicated that she was in agreement with the plans as far as the border of trees on the perimeter of the property was concerned. Albert Holland 1633 West 78th Place Mr. Holland was sworn by Chair THOMPSON. Mr. Holland owns the lot adjacent to the south of the subject property and spoke in favor of the plan. He expressed concern about the retention pond interfering with his plans to build a driveway on his property and how water from the ditch running along the east side of Teller would be brought onto his property. He felt that installation of curb and gutter would be a hindrance in that regard. He was also concerned about increase in traffic. In response to a question from Commissioner GOKEY, Mr. Holland replied that he wanted to see some infrastructure built into the plan to allow him to take water from the ditch. Mr. Goebel replied that this matter would be addressed. Mr. Holland also indicated agreement with the installation of the gate at the end of the street. Margaret Parry 3060 Teller Street Planning Commission Page 11 06/18/98 Chair THOMPSON stated that Ms. Parry has indicated to the City that she is in opposition to the subdivision. Chair THOMPSON then asked if there were individuals who had not signed the public hearing roster but wished to speak. The following individuals addressed the Commission: Martin Burrows 7200 West 31st Place Mr. Burrows was sworn by Chair THOMPSON. He stated that he lives directly across the street from the proposed development and expressed concern about increase in traffic. He did not believe there was a place for any safe entrance into the development. He also expressed concern about lowering water tables and decreased water pressure. He expressed opposition to the project because it would have a negative impact on the neighborhood, and asked that the Planning Commission research the subdivision laws before making a decision. Chair THOMPSON asked Ms. Reckert if the proposed development complied with all subdivision regulations. Ms. Reckert replied that it did. In response to a question from Chair THOMPSON, Mr. Goebel advised that the subdivision regulations and street design guide require 125 feet between streets if they are offset and that it would not be a good idea to have three access points onto 32nd Street all within 300 feet of each other. Chair THOMPSON asked if additional parking could be required on the 12-unit side to alleviate parking needs for the duplexes. Mr. Goebel replied that there would be an area designated as common area which could be used for extra parking. Commissioner GOKEY commented that using the common space for parking could result in the loss of some of the more mature trees on the property. Joann Howard 7260 West 31st Place Ms. Howard was sworn by Chair THOMPSON. She stated that it was her understanding the owner had previously indicated he was building a development for senior citizens and now his plans have changed. She was concerned about increased traffic in the area. She said there was an existing driveway on 32nd next to the RTD bus pad. She did not want to see an access onto Teller. She was also concerned that the development would not be maintained. Commissioner SNOW asked Mr. Goebel about a right-in only entrance from 32nd. He replied that it would be necessary to have right turn lane installed for this to happen. Commissioner BRINKMAN asked for clarification as to whether construction on the multi- family units could proceed even if the subdivision plat were not approved at this time. Ms. Planning Commission Page 12 06/18/98 Reckert replied that it could proceed and that if the application is denied, the applicant could come back with a different subdivision plan or appeal to the City Council. Mr. Garbini returned to the podium to respond to concerns raised by the previous speakers. In regard to the retention pond, Mr. Garbini stated that the engineer felt this was the best solution and would result in saving more trees and reiterated the applicant's sincere desire to save as many trees as possible. He commented that there will be some offsite improvements which will benefit the neighborhood such as the widened street, curb and gutter. He stated that the reason there is no construction taking place at the present time is that, although they have already paid for the fire hydrants, they are waiting to get them installed which is a requirement of the fire department before any demolition or construction can take place. In regard to water pressure, he stated the required looping would increase the size of the water line on Saulsbury thereby increasing water pressure. In regard to the well, he indicated he would check to see if a permit had been obtained. He estimated the number of residents on the property to be around fifty and clarified that they were never planning to build a senior' citizen development but wanted to build a development that would be attractive to people in the Wheat Ridge area. He noted that half of the apartments are ground floor and handicapped accessible as are the duplexes He stated that the site could handle ten single family units, but would not allow as much open space as the present plan. He also stated that he was not aware of the ditch issue concerning Mr. Holland's property but would work with the City and adjacent land owners to provide a swail across the property and would be in agreement with asking the City Council to waive the curb and gutter requirements. In regard to traffic, he commented that he has worked with the City's recommendations. He informed that the picket fence will be rebuilt rather than using chain link fence. In conclusion he informed that, because of vandalism to the property, the house has been rented for a 4-month period in order to have some security on the premises. In response to questions from the Commission, Ms. Reckert stated that average household size in Wheat Ridge in the 1990 census was 2.2 persons per household. In response to comments regarding low density, single family housing in the neighborhood, Mr. Garbini noted that five of the adjacent properties already contained duplexes or group housing. Catherine Dunlap addressed the commission on behalf of the previous speakers who were in opposition to the subdivision. She again expressed concern about the traffic and noted that 32nd Avenue handles a lot of funeral home traffic also. She stated that the majority of people in the neighborhood did not want to see the development take place. She felt that the Saulsbury exit would be preferable to other options. She asked that the City look into installing a stop sign at 30th and Saulsbury as well as the possibility of installing storm drains in the area. It was moved by Commissioner BRINKMAN and seconded by Commissioner SNOW that Case No. MS-98-3, a request for approval of a four-lot minor subdivision on property zoned R-2 and R-3 located at 3195 Saulsbury Street, be recommended to the City Council for Planning Commission Page 13 06/18/98 APPROVAL for the following reasons: 1. Zoning on the property is R-2 and R-3. 2. A subdivision is required to allow development of the south half of the property. 3. All requirements of the Subdivision Regulations have been met. With the following conditions: 1 Note 96 on the front page be corrected to accurately reflect existing zoning (150 feet versus 165 feet.) 2. A note be added that no perimeter fencing is allowed along the eastern side of Lot 1 on Saulsbury Street. 3. The private street/access way be posted "no parking" for fire lane purposes. 4. A note be added that the access way be posted as a fire lane and that property owners are responsible for maintenance. 5. A note be added to the front page that driveways for Lots 2, 3 and 4 be at least 20 feet long from the southern edge of the private street. 6. That a homeowners association be formed to cover maintenance of the private street, ditch and detention areas. 7. That the private street be blocked by a gate on the western end adjacent to Teller Street and that the parking on Teller adjacent to the private street be posted as no parking. 8. That the plan be revised to devise a plan for continuing the ditch flow and provide diversion boxes for all nearby residents who have ditch rights, and that existing ditch be maintained. 9. That a hammerhead turnaround be installed at the end of the private street as approved by the Public Works Department. 10. A line should be clearly delineated on the plan showing the division between R-2 and R-3 properties. Commissioner COLLINS moved that the plan be amended to require a catch basin at the end of the retention pond to connect to the storm sewer. The motion died for lack of a second. Discussion followed. Chair THOMPSON expressed concern about driveways being used for parking and asked if additional parking could be added to the plan. Ms. Reckert replied that they will work with the applicant in this regard. Commissioner GOKEY commented that if more asphalt is required, wiping out more vegetation, more problems could be created than solved. He expressed his opinion that the developer did admirable job which addresses most of the issues. The motion passed by a vote of 6-1, with Commissioner COLLINS voting no 8. CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING Chair THOMPSON declared the public hearing portion of the meeting closed. Planning Commission Page 14 06/18/98 IRECENED JUN 1 1 Director of Planning City of Wheat Ridge 7500 W. 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge CO 80215-5713 Dear Sir: r-v , 4"-L 1235 Everett Ct. Lakewood CO 80215 9 June 1998 Thank you for informing me of the zoning change request (Case no MS 8-0 for large multi-family buildings near the corner of Saulsbury and anus. Our property is directly east across Salsbury directly south of the Rocky Mtn Ditch. I would much rather see down-zoning to single family residences, reflecting the vast majority of housing in this area of fine Wheat Ridge homes. Trees and other vegetation are rapidly disappearing in Wheat Ridge and elsewhere as more and more buildings get constructed on formerly green spaces. Those mature trees and patch of bushes and the white fence southwest of the Saulsbury and 32nd Avenue corner are special. Because of this, please request firm stipulations of the developer to preserve all the vegetation south of 32nd Avenue and north of where the tiny apartments used to be. cc: Bill Cassel, Forester Sincerely,, ~/O a " Lynn A. Yehle ATTACHMENT 3 CM2, Inc. MANAGEMENT Suite 227, 1546 Cole Boulevard, Golden, CO 80401 Tel: 303-233-3447 / Fax: 303-239-8616 MEMORANDUM Date: July 10, 1998 Subject: Happy Landings / Common Area Maintenance To: Meredith Reckert From: Alec Garbini At the time the subdivision of the subject property was granted by the City of Wheat Ridge, the lots created by this action were owned by a single entity Saulsbury Properties, LLLP. It is understood and agreed by Saulsbury Properties, LLLP. that as a condition of the conveyance of any of these lots to a third party not under the control of Saulsbury Properties, LLLP., that a property owners association be formed for the maintenance of the common elements. We suggest the following language: "Prior to the sale of any lot by the land owner, the land owner shall form a homeowners association and prepare and file of record covenants and conditions concerning the maintenance and upkeep of all common elements including, but not limited to private road, and common drainage pond." Please let me know if this is acceptable language. ATTACHMENT 4 Jul-09-98 10:11 CM2 Garbini CM2, Inc. MANAGEMENT +1 303-239-8616 P.02 1546 Cole Boulevard, Suite 227, Golden, CO 80401 Tel: 303-233-3447 / Fax: 303-239-8616 July 9, 1998 Meredith Reckert City of Wheat Ridge Planning Department 7500 West 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80215-6713 Re: Happy Landings Subdivision In response to your question about the detention pond and drainage options available for the Happy Landings project, please be aware of the following. The site is relatively flat with approximately a five foot drop in elevation from the flow line on Teller Street to the new street section being constructed as part of this project on Saulsbury. Therefore the natural slope of the site is 1.5%. The natural slope of the site is to the southeast as a result of the original agricultural development of the property which used surface irrigation originating from laterals along Teller and the Rocky Mountain Ditch. The ditch company prohibits new construction from draining any runoff into the ditch. They were even concerned that we showed downspouts on the north side of the proposed apartment building. This required that we accentuate the drainage to the south east corner of the site. The Planning Dept. was concerned that we minimize the disturbance of the grades adjacent to the edge of the lot on the south. The result of trying to accommodate the various interested parties was to develop a series of very shallow swales leading to a collection area on the south east comer of the site. The engineers have designed this area to detain ATTACHMENT 5 Jul-09-98 10:11 CM2 Garbini +1 303-239-8616 P.03 minor storms as well as the 100 year storm flows as required by the city, and to release the water at no more than historic rates from the site. We believe the size of detention pond may be reduced by creating another pond north of the interior parking lot, adjacent to Saulsbury. To do this we must remove a number of substantial trees which appear to be in good health. Because of that, we have chosen to consolidate the drainage in an area where there are no existing trees. The existing natural drainage along the flow line of the street is currently to the south. In order to connect to the existing storm drain in 32nd Ave. we would need to build a 300 foot long storm sewer below Saulsbury flowing north. The bottom of the Rocky Mountain Ditch lies approximately six feet below the intersection of Saulsbury and 32nd. The elevations of the ditch and the existing 36" storm sewer below 32nd Ave. appear to be parallel to each other. In order to run below the ditch, we would fall below the intercept point with the existing storm sewer in 32nd. This is a technically infeasible solution. Please consider that the design solution presented meets the City of Wheat Ridge requirements, and that the discharge from this detention pond is in conformance with City requirements. Under this design, even though the volume of flow will increase as the result of paving the future rate of discharge will actually be less than currently exists at this site. Please call me if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, Alec Garbini Project Manager for Saulsbury Properties, LLLP. 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE The City of P.O. BOX 638 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80034-0E28 1303) 234-5900 Wheat City Admin. Fax 234 5924 Police Dept. Fax: 235 2949 6Ridge POSTING CERTIFICATION 6 CASE NO. PLANNING COMMISSION - CITY COUNCIL - BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (Circle One) HEARING DATE: 8 - IS I, residing at (n a m e MPoR.A- Jr, L) (a d d as the applicant for Case No. r e s s that I have posted the Notice of Public Hearing at S1610 TEL,t,C - ti S,A,i cR112u , hereby certify (1 o c a t i o n)1 q on this day of u(stksr'°® " 19 1 a and do hereby cert y that said sign has been posted and remained in place for fifteen (15) days prior to and including the scheduled day of public hearing of this case shown on the map below. NOTE This form must be submitted at the public I and will be placed in the applicant's case Department of Planning and Development. M A P <pc>postingcert rev. 05-19-94 1,3tto Grp 801 C, , . I'+..,.. The sign was posted in the position 7ne City of 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80215 Wheat GRidge August 4, 1998 Dear Property Owner: This is to inform you that Case No. MS-98-03 which is a request for approval of a minor subdivision of an R-2/R-3 zoned property into 4 lots located at 3195 Saulsbury Street and 3190 Teller will be heard by the Wheat Ridge City Council in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue. The meeting will be held on August 24, 1998, at 7:00 p.m. All owners and/or their legal counsel of the parcel under consideration must be present at this hearing. As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to notify any other persons whose presence is desired at this hearing. If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2846. Thank you. Planning Division. C\Barbara\CCRPTS\PUBNOTIC\ins9803certletter#2.wpd (303) 234-5900 • ADMINISTRATION FAX: 234-5924 POLICE DEPARTMENT FAX: 235-2949 a v N w _ K m a U ` N C C U ~ u.~ c Q U U ~ O 2 E y a ~ m v a v ~ a 2 a ~ a 'U WI 3 a ~ N p' O w C ~ N E o d 0- L o m E c E d o 0 0 0 0 ;~r d a a v N o W 0 W 0 ep 0 W 0 M W M W ro .`C N W N N N N N N N N N ¢ m° 5 E E E E E E E E E u 0 O X N ° 16 G C C m.0 O - M y M O) o O C C N N U N V u') O ^ M N M OO ~ N C O "O O fn ^ ~ O W O N N v 00~ O j W y Y > L O OIL W D N ad O N p L UN ~ T> O N d N =w N¢ O E U _ w 0 _ L M d r+ } m 0 O¢ O co a U N 7 K n O C J a 0 L w O N o ~n d 0 O O C N O a TM 0 0 M = U c mU y c M M d!~+U = U Y 4a N 9 c '0 = 6 ( I a 2 O Zj "O O j > > ~p u TW 'O J O N a d N 'O N U) O C N a ry O N 'O co O y w a Z inD . ~K LLN 3 Q°'am rriM =o °3 Jo °3 R N d N n O ^ N CJ t4 M N rC N y r N C ¢ Y O N N O Y M pY~/ M Y M V y j .O 2 O L N ~2 l6 N L N (6 N .O a d o .O n~ J J r~ J J _ C ~ U N [6 ¢ - N a a~ U~ 0 ' ` O md o»o ~ E y O a N w o c~15 8 w O Z ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Lr) W N a Y O 'C N M a ~n ~o n o~ m Q O ¢ M M M M M M M _ o m rn rn rn m m m m m ` W V a o 0 0 o n 0 m 0 0 m 0 aaW m rn m rn m m m W 0 z = LL N o a d W } O H O 2 v n I U a ~ a v N OI ~ pI d G d a U v c ~ m C N m d U d O C Q ~ u L K C o z m ~ 3 R GI W a C a ~ a U N d ~ j O w N N O, O S v . _ N O Q 0 0 E E a u o L p ~ O p C W O N y'c # y M O M O M O M O M O M O M O M O M O x u m a N m m N m N m N m M w N m N N Q m°$ (J N E E E N E N E N E N E E N E u O N N a a M M c M N M M M M C M N C > O N O E j O - N O N> T ` O > O N O J O O OJ N Q Y> M Q 6 N Q UI 0 > m N Q = Q i O Q Q N N O o 1 w Z Q d d N •L a0 0 C0 ' 0 l oa0 U Ea0 U f0 a0 U j~o U O0 o h N"6Q E U ` U O N N U N U C N O M O N E N C N o m N M j [f] U N O M N M v M ry ry V M ry N M dj N M y d M N Z y ry a d a _ a_ O R a_ A ;O > a_ O a 'C O a a R mM~ ry N N M N N Z l0 2 m N N l6 Y - N N 0 N O r L . - r L 16 N n L O r L r L r L r t N r N N n t 'a a °-'v - a a 3 U C a) c'm Q - ~-a mss 0 E ° m ' A w 0 d 6 x ~U Uw J z U N W N d v Q V i"' Q O M M N M M Y M N M (O r M W O ao m m m m m m m m m m M m o ` 0 a o n o o 0 m 0 m 0 0 0 m E m m m m m m ¢¢W Z N O Q n o W I 55 ~ J NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge CITY COUNCIL on August 24, 1998 at 7:00 p.m. at 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. The following petitions shall be heard: 1. " Case No. MS-98-03: An application submitted by Saulsbury Properties for approval of a minor subdivision of 4 lots for residential apartments and duplexes. Said Property is zoned R-2 and R-3 and located at 3195 Saulsbury Street and 3190 Teller Street and legally described as follows: A replat of the North 3/4 of the North 3/5 of the West'/2 of Lot 1, Block 2 Barth's Subdivision, a subdivision in the Southeast one-quarter of Section 26, Township 3 South, Range 69 West, of the 6`^ Principal Meridian, City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado. Case No. WZ-98-13: An application by The Chesrown Automotive Group for approval of an amended, Planned Commercial Development outline for property located at 3601 Wadsworth Blvd. Said property is legally described as follows: A tract of land located in the East Half of the North East Quarter of the North West Quarter of Section 26, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the North Quarter Corner of said Section; thence South 00°02'34"West along the North-South Centerline of said Section, a distance of 528.00 feet; thence South 89°59'44"West a distance of 45.00 feet to the Westerly Right-of-way line of Wadsworth Boulevard which is the True Point of Beginning; Thence continuing along said described course, a distance of 615.00 feet; Thence South 00°02'34"West and parallel to the East line of the North East Quarter of the North West Quarter of said Section, a distance of 402.11 feet; Thence North 79 °36'35"East, a distance of 2.13 feet; Thence South 89°56'15"East, a distance of 15.00 feet to the Northeast corner of a Tract of land described in Book 2758 at Page 59 of the Jefferson County Records; Thence South 99'l V45"West and parallel to the East line of the B and H Tract as platted in Book 28 at Page 58 of the Jefferson County Records, a distance of 381.64 feet to the North line of West 35th Avenue; Thence South 89°56'15"East and parallel to the South Line of said North East Quarter of the North West Quarter, a distance of 588.77 feet to the West Line of Wadsworth Boulevard as described in Book 1183 at Page 141; Thence North 00°02'34"East along said West line a distance of 618.58 feet; Thence North 03 °32'34" East along said West line a distance of 165.80 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Except that portion described in instrument recorded in Jefferson County, March 13, 1984 under Reception No. 84022528, and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the North Quarter Corner of said Section 26; Thence West along the North line of said Section 26, a distance of 660.00 feet to a Point being 1969.76 feet from the northwest comer of said Section 26; Thence South 00°02'34" West and parallel with the East line of the North West Quarter of said Section 26, a distance of 930.11 feet to the Southeast Corner of the Subdivision of Wheat Ridge Plaza and the True Point of Beginning; Thence South 89°56'15"East, a distance of 15.00 feet; Thence North 00°02'34"East, a distance of 9.00 feet; thence North 43'06'0 1 "West, a distance of 21.94 feet; Thence South 00°02'34"West, a distance of 25.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. NOTES: 1. Date of Survey, June 29-3Q 1996 2. Basis of Bearing, SO0°02'34"W, 1327.50 Ft. between found survey monuments as shown at the north quarter corner of Section 26 and the Center North Sixteenth Comer Under consideration with the same case number is a request by the Chesrown Automotive Group for approval of a Planned Commercial Development combined preliminary and final development plan for 1.74 acres within the property described above. Said property is legally described as follows: A tract of land located in the East Half of the North East Quarter of the North West Quarter of Section 26, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the North Quarter Comer of said Section; thence South 00 °02'34"West along the North-South Centerline of said Section, a distance of 528.00 feet; thence South 89 °59'44"West a distance of 45.00 feet to the Westerly Right-of-way line of Wadsworth Boulevard which is the True Point of Beginning; Thence continuing along said described course, a distance of 501.50 feet; thence South 00°00'00" East a distance of 27.90 feet; thence North 89°25'30" East a distance of 120.84 feet: 00°06"50" East a distance of 160.41 feet; thence North 89°52'45"East a distance of 370.06 feet to the West line of Wadsworth Boulevard; thence North 00°02'34"East along said West line a distance of 27.87 feet; thence North 03 °32'34"East along said West line a distance of 165.80 feet to the true beginning point. Y./LU ~l Ns w n Nd+~-Q0..C Se.~GC./~ Barbara Delgadillo, cording Secretary ATTEST: 41:N Wanda SaTo be Published: Wheat Ridge Transcript Date: August 7, 1998 A:\8-24publ ication.wpd City of Wheat Ridge Planning and Development Department Memorandum TO: 319,5 Saulsbury Building Permit File IL/14S-98-03: Happy Landings FROM: Barbara Delgadillo SUBJECT: Tree Removal DATE: August 12, 1998 A call was received today from a caller to inform the City that the contractor at 3195 Saulsbury had removed a 24" tree and was attempting to bury it. Bill Cassel was contacted and made aware of the situation. UPDATE AUGUST 13,1998: Bill Cassel went out to the site and discovered that other trees and small items had been removed from the location in addition to the 24" tree. cc: Darin Morgan Sean McCartney C.~ arburz~ANM5 0903tree wpe Date 8/5/98 Number of pages including cover sheet 2 To, EREDITH RECKERT WHEAT RIDGE PAUL VON FEY HINKLES & McCOY ADAIR GROUP Phone Fax Phone CC: From: CM2, Inc. / Management Suite 227 1546 Cole Boulevard Golden, CO 86401 Alec Garbini Phone 303-2333447 Fax Phone 303-239-8616 ❑ urgent ❑ For your review HOPE YOU ALL CAN READ THIS SKETCH. ❑ Reply ASAP ❑ Please comment IN ORDER TO SAVE THE FOUR MAPLE TREES IN THE CENTER OF THE SITE IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO SHIFT THE WATER EASEMENT NORTH FROM PREVIOUS LOCATION (MOVE APARTMENT PARKING OUT OF EASEMENT AREA), AND SEPARATE IT FROM THE ACCESS EASEMENT WHICH WILL BE SOUTHOF THE WATER EASEMENT. THE PRIVATE ACCESS ROAD WILL BE 20 FEET WIDE AND WILL BE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE 25 FOOT EASEMENT. THE EXISTING TREES WILL FIT INTO THE 5 FOOT REMAINING ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE ACCESS EASEMENT. LET ME KNOW IF THERE ARE ANY PROBLEMS WITH THIS SUGGESTION. ALEC i0'd 9198-6£Z-£0£ 1+ 1-ULq-AV9 ZWO i1=80 136-SO-6nV Received: 81 5/98 9:36AM; +1 303 239 861A CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE; Page 2 Aug-05-98 08:11 CM2 Garbini +1 303-239-8616 P.02 S?~t- oDS\Ha0PV Land ingsWirev.awg Ned Aug 05 DB:44:18 199B X W i F cZ n;C. i a n c v A I ~v a ROW - p\Z oC ~v i < n n (D a <:n o'N_w m a'e ~''L? y rn a"~. O (aD w - 10 o 70q < G 0 o F,NbO aK7 ~ 7 y O m o b Q ,o 0 (au O W O n O av ro (D a 5-•'0 5• w On 0 0 C) 0 ti G o w C x <<N m Z o o a a 5 w i° 5 ? ro b 00 In o w a C ao.CD o 0~ a ~ N 0 . Pe a o a,ET y N aC o v o m C w- o n C D. a ~ y00 0 „,b a aw o 0 C] 5 0 (b 0 . y~ C" 7 a. y n tt It It N co M "wA "r®O_ 7 N O N 2C . cQD m o n ~ °•5.a < a • 1 .n 00-0 0 0 El " p a n „N, (D 00 0 o G _ 5 wF 0 0 o o rn 0 0 c o o t3- E~ c 0 ®1 wxg '45x<oI9 (D rn w CD abo ~.E =.4Q°0 N Q.aCeGd wo CL W C~, 8- w° 5 0 5 m xP7' a f.°0 5 5 5 way b 5'0 o ao S o ~o0 F, G CD 0 w 5 0° G G~° w° o a a y$ °nac F a C - o o ae ~v 7c a wow=wa° ".aa a a 5ID D a n y cr z a.~ °.y Cl °w?m0 : y- toaMto Hy. 5ro 5rnbo w. CD rjQ b 01 N N w 0. 0 0 bq C;- a o~° CD ° :r ~ro o 5 ~ am <vwa F n va DEr I F o m w y 5 2 w w o H ti tr N (D G 'U y R a a y A. UQa ,nY y a o D rrte~, 5 5~ 0 ya °.v b ~ o UQ C5 < F w c 7 o o a jQ bo 0. 0" C~ CD o F r• 0 5' 0 n n o n O O O aa.nr C1 C 0 rn d n go ry o. O GG rt G „Cy b w N C 7 O a -n a anyy 0 N vwi 'i7 ~ W ® ry n n O O FS .a. w ry er '0J n . C n a ,"ro o o rn" w a a CD oc<n.a,N, a~cw 0, -o oS ;~yo o 0, a~ a.~:o~ rt wp o ~ E ~5 0 Joao ~i ~ a e bac,F N 5 P~ N.~ no o0, w ~o.o •oo my CDw CL G d C 5 M q P, (D .yam o a• _ m a 5 w o 0 C' R o' C C N ~O o w rn a o S P_ a ~Ya 0cr by °rnbrn G t3, 0 y O p' A. .w- ❑ G ~ ~ N a CD O O O .w+ n O N F F 5 w p 7 't7 O rs~' ? G ti N QC (D a' T (D H~ D A N m o w OrQ Obq Q•G O O'27 trg T (IQ CD WHEAT RIDGE CITY C",' INCIL MINUTES: JULY 27, 1998, PAGE -2- Motion by Mr. Donnelly to reconsider Council Approval of Council Bill 23; An Ordinance vacating the Right of Way on 50th Avenue adjacent to 11001 and 11201 W. 1-70 Frontage Road North and to add this Item to the Agenda as number 5_A.; seconded by Mr. Siler; carried 5-4; Mayor broke the tie by voting yes; with Mrs. Shaver, Mr. DiTullio, Mrs. Worth and Mrs. Dalbec voting no: Motion by Mr. Donnelly to reconsider the Approval of an Amended Building Plan Case PBG 98;01 Medved Auto Plex and add the Item to the Agenda as number 5_,B• seconded by Mr. Mancinelli. Mrs. Dalbec wanted to review her packet from the past meeting on the issue and asked Mr. Donnelly to postpone the vote; Mr. Donnelly declined. Motion carried 5-4; Mayor broke the tie by voting yes; with Mrs. Shaver, Mr. DiTullio, Mrs. Worth and Mrs. Dalbec voting no. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ORDINANCES ON SECOND READING m 1. Approval of a four-lot minor subdivision on property zoned R-2 and R-3 located at 3195 Saulsbury Street and 3190 Teller Street. (Case No. MS-98-3) (Alec Garbini) Item 1 was introduced by Mr. DiTullio. Applicant, Alec Garbini, 1546 Cole Blvd., was sworn in and presented his case. Meredith Rechert, was sworn in and presented staff report and entered into record the Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Regulations, Case File, Packet Materials and Exhibits. The following citizens were sworn in by the Mayor and expressed concerns regarding drainage, traffic, parking and stated that this was a different plan than the plan submitted to the Planning Commission: Tom Slattery, Margaret Perry, Catherine Dunlap, Diane Simmons and JoAnn Howard. Ralph Hinst, 3120 Saulsbury, was sworn in by the Mayor and stated that this is a wonderful improvement to the property. Alice Hinst, was sworn in and stated that she hopes that the stone house will be preserved. Bob Goebel was sworn in by the Mayor and addressed the drainage questions. Mr..Dahl stated that the mailed notice of this meeting was defective by not being sent to the required notice area. WHEAT RIDGE CITY _C- UNCIL MINUTES: JULY 27, 1998 PAGE -3- Motion by Mr. DiTullio that Case No. MS-98-3, a request for approval of a four lot minor subdivision on property zoned R-2 and R-3 located at 3195 Saulsbury Street and 3190 Teller Street be renoticed and posted fora new Public Hearing on August 24, 1998; seconded by Mr. Siler; carried 8-0. iiem 2. Council Bill 26 - An Ordinance designating the Joy Williams Barn, located at 11.460 West 44`" Avenue, as an Historic Landmark in the City of Wheat Ridge. (Case No. WHL-98-01) (Joy-Williams) Council Bill 26 was introduced on second reading by Mrs. Worth; title and summary read by the Clerk; Ordinance No. 1127 assigned:. Alan White presented the staff report, history of the structure and the historic landmark criteria. The Zoning Ordinance, Case File, Packet Materials and Exhibits were entered into record. Motion by Mrs. Worth that Case No. WHL-98-1, a request for approval of designation of a local historical landmark for a barn located at 11460 West 44" Avenue, be approved for the following reasons: 1. The barn is located on property that was once owned by James Baugh, an early gold settler, who has local historical significance. 2. The barn, which has not had any major additions or alteration, emulates barn construction of the late 1880's. 3. The structure has been preserved in a condition that would not warrant the need.for major renovation to preserve the historic construction. 4. The Wheat Ridge Historical Society Board of Directors recommends approval of this request; seconded by Mr. DiTullio. Motion by Mr. Siler for an amendment to the Motion that no city funds or manpower will be used on this, local historical landmark as long as it is private property; seconded by Mr. Mancinelli. Mrs. Worth asked for a friendly Amendment to Mr. Silers Amendment which continues stating... until some time in the future that the City would set up a grant program for restoration of buildings in the City of Wheat Ridge; Mr. Siler accepted the friendly Amendment. Amendment to the Motion carried 77=1 with Mrs. Shaver voting no. Original Motion carried 8-0. Item 3. Council Bill 27 - An Ordinance amending the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws to provide for collection of delinquent charges, assessments or taxes. Council Bill 27 was introduced on second reading by Mr. Siler; title and summary read by the Clerk; Ordinance No. 1128 assigned. Motion by Mr. Siler for the adoption of Council Bill 27 (Ordinance 1128); seconded by Mr. Mancinelli; carried 8-0. _ - 41 ® . . .p. . ~ „+w w~ t r ~ ~ 1 ~ I'~41 1 f`"~i ® / "7"' 10^6 ► i A REPEAT OF THE NORTH 3/4 OF THE NORTH 3/~i OF THE WEST 1/2 OF A SUBDIVISION IN THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 26, T OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDI CITY OF Wf-IEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, ST FINAL PLAT ~''F T J re~~roc~d, DEDICATICIN =-C' S ~ ~~~t~ Saulsbury Properties LLLP, being the owner(s) of the real property of 2.042 acres desc ~~r~~ 'r i follows: ~~r ;u; NORTH 3/4 OF THE NORTH 3/5 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF LOT i t .r,.- BLOCK 2, i BARTH'S SUBDIVISION 1 ~ ~ a CQUNTY OF JEFFERSON, • ~ t _ _ ~ STATE OF COLORADO and I~as laid out, subdivided and platted said {and as per the drawing hereon contain name and style of Happy Landings, a subdivision of a part of the C~if~y of Wheat ,t Ridge, Colorado, and by these presents does dedicate to the City of Wheat Ridge and streets, roads and avenues and drives as shown on the accompanying plat for the pu and does (do) further dedicate fio the use of the Cit of Wheat Ridge; and all municip municipally franchised utilities and services those por~ions of said real property which easements and rights-of-way for the construction, installation, operation, maintenance, 1 i3 ~ . - replacement for all services, including withou# limiting the generality ~f the foregoing,, electric lines, work, poles and underground cables, gas pipelines, water pipelines, sanrf street tights, culverts, hydrants, drainage ditches and drains and all appurtenances the understood and agreed by the undersigned that all expenses and costs involved in con installing sanitary sewer system works and lines, gas service lines, electrical service w sewers and drains, street lighting, grading and landscaping, curbs, gutters, street pave other such utilities and services shall be guaranteed and paid for .by the subdivider or ~ 1 J iU ■ s ~ _ i ~J ~ the subdivider therefor which are approved by the City of Wheat Ridge, and such sum the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado, and that any ifem so constructed or installed when 1 of Wheat Ride, Colorado, shall become the sole property of said City except items ow franchised utilities and~or the Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company whic constructed ar installe shalt rer~nain tMe property of the owner and shall not become City. Holder of geed~s) of trust nereoy re eases c aim io areas aea ca~ea o puo c use. v, I 1 I City of Wheat Ridge I Director of Public Works m o m City of Wheat Ridge STATE OF COLORADO) a Director of Parks and Recreation Cc~:~~rrni:~sion ss COUNTY GF JEF EFcSON) City of Wheat Ridge The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day Direcfior of Planning and Developm~~~t A.D. 19----' bY Witness my hand and official seal. My Commission expires :~~f SHAt I RF City of Wheat Ridge City Engineer Notary Public 'a, r'~EIRS, ~~~F r~ e ~tr~- 'dAV~ THE RIf;NT T_(~ ,~~I~v hd_r~~ ~trt~n Wn~r olorado, do hereby certify that the curve y a nay ~uperv~s~ar~ an or about the f plafi accurately and properly shaw~ said OWNERS - t SAULSBURY PROPERTIES,LLLP, ACOLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CO ~~v ti 1 t~ f ~ 4~ I -~lf.y 144 ° ~Rc BY: r w HAROLD R. SMETHILLS, MANAGING PARTNER m. ~ 1546 COLE BOULEVARD SUITE 227 I ~ 4 ~ ~ GOLDEN, COLORADO 80401 ~ ' (303) 233-3447 ~ . .'7<rry~._ ~ x o'~La~l~ . THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS DA 1 OF .1997 BY AS ~ SAULSBURY PROPERTIES, LLLP, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP C MY COMMISSION EXPIRES WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFIGAL SEAL. NOTARY PUBLIC I.AJt t11J I VhC T I vv I v* vI is I LwasVl 11 vv%r%.%. w l sls l v.r ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN TEAS SURVEY WITHIN THREE FHR YEARS I ITTI 17TnNi r-n !Rnj r)g MS-98-3 AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY AN BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED UPON 4 r TEN (10) YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HERE( CR.,S,l3-80-105(3)(a). qtr . -s, i S 1 i F S i 1- 1 f CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO: City Council DATE OF MEETING: July 27, 1998 DATE PREPARED: July 17, 1998 CASE NO. & NAME: MS-98-3/Saulsbury Properties CASE MANAGER: M. Reckert ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a four-lot minor subdivision LOCATION OF REQUEST: 3195 Saulsbury Street/3190 Teller Street NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT(S): NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER(S): APPROXIMATE AREA: PRESENT ZONING: PRESENT LAND USE: SURROUNDING ZONING: SURROUNDING LAND USE: DATE PUBLISHED: DATE POSTED: DATED LEGAL NOTICES SENT: ENTER INTO RECORD: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (X) ZONING ORDINANCE (X) SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OTHER Alec Garbini CM2 Management 1547 Cole Blvd. Golden, CO Saulsbury Properties, LLC 1546 Cole Blvd., #227 Golden, CO 80401 2.042 acres R-2 and R-3 Single Family, Multi-family, vacant N, S, E: R-2; W: R-2, R-1A N, S, E and W: Low Density Residential July 10, 1998 July 12, 1998 July 8, 1998 (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS SLIDES (X) EXHIBITS JURISDICTION: The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. I. REQUEST The applicant requests approval of a four-lot minor subdivision on property located at 3195 Saulsbury Street/3190 Teller Street. The property is split-zoned with R-3 on the north half and R-2 on the south half. The zone break line falls roughly 145' south of the north property line. II. CASE HISTORY The property in question was subject to a zone change request from R-2 and R-3 to Planned Residential Development per Case No. WZ-97-1. This application was made on December 18, 1996, but was never forwarded to Planning Commission or City Council for public hearing. On February 22, 1997, Ordinance No. 1066 became effective which placed a moratorium on zone change applications for rezonings to R-2, R-3, R-3A, R-2A and PRD zones. City Council then passed a series of ordinances in the fall of 1997 which reduced the allowable densities in the R-2A, R-3, R-3A and PRD zone districts. The application for Case No. WZ-97-1 was subsequently withdrawn. In May of 1998, the owner applied for and was granted a building permit for the construction of 12 multi-family units for the northern portion of the property zoned R-3. Staff would note that the multi- family units under construction are consistent with the density established pursuant to Ordinance No. 1090. However, because of the density limitations, the existing single family home on the northwest corner of the property must be removed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the new multi-family units. The owner has now applied for approval of a subdivision to plat the southern portion zoned R-2 into three duplex sites. A site plan for development is included as Attachment 3. The design for the multi-family portion has been altered somewhat since Planning Commission review as the site plan reviewed by the Planning Commission had zoning violations. The site plan shown as Attachment 3 has been revised to comply with zoning code. Attachment 4 is a letter received regarding the request. 111. AGENCY REFERRALS All outside service agencies can serve the property with improvements paid for at the developer's expense. Public Service Company has requested specific language which has been included as note #4. Consolidated Mutual Water Company will require the looping of a water mainline between Teller and Saulsbury Streets within a 30' wide easement. City Council Page 2 MS-98-03/Saulsbury Properties Wheat Ridge Fire Protection District will require a fire hydrant to be installed at the southeast comer of Lot 1 just north of the entrance drive to the duplexes on Saulsbury. An additional hydrant is required on Teller adjacent to the multi-family drive. Wheat Ridge Public Works Department has commented relative to the technical elements of the plat. Public improvements will be required to be constructed along the Teller and Saulsbury Street frontages A drainage report for the subdivision is in the process of being reviewed. The Parks and Recreation Commission has requested a 5% land value contribution in lieu of land dedication. IV. SUBDIVISION DESIGN The proposed four-lot minor subdivision will allow the multi-family structure with associated parking which is currently under construction to be contained within Lot 1. Lots 2, 3, and 4 fall within the R-2 zoned portion and are being proposed as duplex sites. Access to the eastern two duplexes (lots 3 and 4) is by way of a 25' wide ingress/egress easement to Saulsbury. Access to Lot 2 is from Teller Street. A 30' wide easement is imposed over the duplex private drive for water line looping. Access to all four lots is in compliance with City codes. A T right-of-way dedication will occur for Saulsbury Street. A signature block for the Rocky Mountain Water Company has been provided on the first sheet. The applicant will not be enclosing the ditch. The ditch company has concurred. All trees over F in diameter in size which are in good health have been shown on the document with a note (#5) prohibiting their removal. The applicant's representative worked with the City Forester to evaluate the health of the trees to be saved. Staff would note that the setbacks for the duplexes will be measured from the lot line, not the easement line. Staff would recommend that driveways accessing the easement must be 20' in depth to allow parking in front of garages. This should be included as a note on the front sheet. Attachment 5 contains language regarding maintenance of common elements such as drainage easements. This should be incorporated as a plat note. Attachment 6 is an explanation of why the drainage system was designed to flow to the southeast rather than to the north to the storm sewer in 32nd Avenue. All requirements of the Subdivision Regulations have been met. City Council Page 3 MS-98-03/Saulsbury Properties V. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Planning Commission reviewed this request at a public hearing held on June 18, 1998. A recommendation for APPROVAL was made for the following reasons: 1. Zoning on the property is R-2 and R-3. 2. A subdivision is required to allow development of the south half of the property. 3. All requirements of the Subdivision Regulations have been met. With the following conditions: 1. Note #6 on the front page be corrected to accurately reflect existing zoning (150 feet versus 165 feet.) 2. A note be added that no perimeter fencing is allowed along the eastern side of Lot I on Saulsbury Street. 3. The private street/access way be posted "no parking" for fire lane purposes. 4. A note be added that the access way be posted as a fire lane and that property owners are responsible for maintenance. 5. A note be added to the front page that driveways for Lots 2, 3 and 4 be at least 20 feet long from the southern edge of the private street. 6. That a homeowners association be formed to cover maintenance of the private street, ditch and detention areas. 7. That the private street be blocked by a gate on the western end adjacent to Teller Street and that the parking on Teller adjacent to the private street be posted as `no parking'. 8. That the plan be revised to devise a plan for continuing the ditch flow and provide diversion boxes for all nearby residents who have ditch rights, and that existing ditch be maintained. 9. That a hammerhead turnaround be installed at the end of the private street as approved by the Public Works Department. 10. A line should be clearly delineated on the plan showing the division between R-2 and R-3 properties. Based on administrative site plan modification, note numbers 2, 4, 7 and 9 are no longer applicable. In regard to condition number 1, the zoning line is closer to 145' south and, therefore, this condition must be adjusted. VI. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION Staff has concluded that zoning on the property is R-2 and R-3 and that a subdivision is required to allow construction on the southern (R-2) portion. Staff further concludes that all requirements of the Zoning Code and Subdivision Regulations have been met and, therefore, a recommendation of APPROVAL is given with the following conditions: City Council Page 4 MS-98-03/Saulsbury Properties 1. Note #6 be corrected to accurately reflect existing zoning (145' versus 165'). 2. A note be added that driveways for Lots 3 and 4 be at least 20' long from the edge of the private street. 3. A note be added that the access for Lots 3 and 4 by posted `no parking' for fire lane purposes. 4. A homeowners' association be formed to cover maintenance of the ditch and detention areas with language on Attachment 5 included as a plat note. VII. RECOMMENDED MOTIONS Option A: "I move that Case No. MS-98-3, a request for approval of a four lot minor subdivision on property zoned R-2 and R-3 located at 3195 Saulsbury Street and 3190 Teller Street, be APPROVED for the following reasons: 1. Zoning on the property is R-2 and R-3. 2. A subdivision is required to allow development of the south half of the property. 3. All requirements of the Subdivision Regulations have been met. With the following conditions: 1. Note #6 be corrected to accurately reflect existing zoning (145' versus 165'). 2. A note be added that driveways for Lots 3 and 4 be at least 20' long from the edge of the private street. 3. A note be added that the access for Lots 3 and 4 by posted `no parking' for fire lane purposes. 4. A homeowners' association be formed to cover maintenance of the ditch and detention areas with language on Attachment 5 included as a plat note. Option B:"I move that Case No. MS-98-3, a request for approval of a four lot minor subdivision on property zoned R-2 and R-3 located at 3195 Saulsbury Street and 3190 Teller Street be DENIED for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3." CTarbara\CCRPTSWS983SR. WPD City Council Page 5 MS-98-03/Saulsbury Properties With the following condition: That the fire hydrant requested by the Arvada Fire District be placed no later than after the foundation has been constructed. The motion passed by a vote of 7-0. (Chair THOMPSON declared a recess at 8:20 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 8:30 P.M.) C. Case No. MS-98-03: A request by Saulsbury Properties for approval of a minor subdivision of four lots for residential apartments and duplexes. Said property is located at 3195 Saulsbury Street. Meredith Reckert distributed copies of the following exhibits which were then entered into the record and accepted by Chair THOMPSON: Exhibit A: Letter dated June 9, 1998 from Lynn Yehle, 1235 Everett Court, Lakewood, expressing his desire to see the subject property rezoned to single family residence and that all vegetation on the subject property between 32nd Avenue and the ditch be preserved. Exhibit B: Site and grading plan for Happy Landings Apartments. Ms. Reckert presented slides and overhead projections of the subject property. She entered the zoning ordinance, subdivision regulations, case file, packet materials and exhibits into the record which were accepted by Chair THOMPSON. She informed that the property was within the City of Wheat Ridge, that all notification and posting requirements had been met and there was jurisdiction to hear the case. Ms. Reckert informed that the applicant was requesting approval of a four-lot minor subdivision on the subject property which is split-zoned R-3 on the north half and R-2 on the south half. She presented a history of the case and informed that the property was formerly subject to a zone change request from R-2 and R-3 to Planned Residential Development (Case No. WZ-97-1). The application, a request to construct sixteen multi-family units, six duplex units and two single family lots was made on December 18, 1996, but was never forwarded to Planning Commission or City Council for public hearing. On February 22, 1997, Ordinance No. 1066 became effective which placed a moratorium on rezone applications to R-2, R-3, R-3 )A, R-2A and PRD zones. A series of ordinances were passed in the fall of 1997 which reduced the densities in R-3 from 21 units per acre to 12 units per acre. She informed that the application was subsequently withdrawn. Ms. Reckert stated that in May of 1998 the owner applied for and was granted a building permit for the construction of twelve multi-family units on the property zoned R-3 which was consistent with density established by Ordinance No. 1090. She informed that if the Planning Commission Page 6 06/18/98 ATTACHMENT 2 single family residence stays on the property, the buildable density for multi-family units would be reduced to nine units. She stated that the applicant had applied for approval of a subdivision to plat the southern portion (zoned R-2) into three duplex sites. Ms. Reckert reviewed the agency referrals and informed that all outside service agencies could serve the property with improvements paid for by the developer. She informed that Consolidated Mutual Water Company would require looping of a water main line between Teller and Saulsbury within the thirty-foot access way (private street); that the Wheat Ridge Fire Protection District would require a fire hydrant to be installed at the southwest corner and would not allow perimeter fencing to occur along the eastern side of Lot 1; and that Public Service requirements would have to be met. She informed that the Wheat Ridge Public Works Department required improvements to be constructed along the Teller and Saulsbury Street frontages, and that a drainage report was in the review process. She advised that the Parks and Recreation Commission had requested a 5% land value contribution in lieu of land dedication. Ms. Reckert reviewed the subdivision design. A common drive/private street would provide access to all four lots by way of a 30-foot easement located on the northern 24-foot portion of the R-2 lots and the southern six feet of Lot 1 and the access way had not been used to calculate allowable density. The utility easement/private street would span between Teller and Saulsbury. The Teller Street entrance would be gated for emergency access only with no parking allowed, and maintenance of the drive area would be responsibility of property owners. A 5-foot right-of-way dedication occurs along Saulsbury Street. All trees over one foot diameter which are in good health have been shown on the face of the plat and cannot be removed without review and approval of the City. The City Forester has worked with the applicant to evaluate health of trees on the property. The setback for duplex units would be measured from the property line and it was recommended that driveways and setbacks be at least twenty feet on the southern edge of the access way so off street parking would be assured. Ms. Reckert informed that it was staff s conclusion that a subdivision is required to allow construction on the southern R-2 portion of the property and that the private street/access way would be the best option available for internal access. Since all requirements for the Subdivision Regulations had been met, recommendation for approval was given with the following conditions: 1. Note #6 be corrected to accurately reflect existing zoning (150' vs. 165') 2. A note be added that no perimeter fencing be allowed along the eastern side of Lot 1 for fire protection purposes. 3. The private street/access way be posted "no parking" for fire lane purposes and maintained by the owners within the subdivision. 4. A note be added that driveways for Lots 2, 3, and 4 be at least 20 feet long from the southern edge of the private street. Planning Commission Page 7 06/18/98 Commissioner SNOW expressed concern about maintenance of the private street if any of the duplexes or apartments were to be sold. Ms. Reckert replied that it would be appropriate for the Commission to require a homeowners association with protective covenants which would ensure maintenance of the roadway. Chair THOMPSON expressed concern about guest parking for duplexes. Ms. Reckert informed that the building permit required at least three guest spaces for the multi-family units which is consistent with code. She noted that there was no guest parking requirement for single family residences. Commissioners BRINKMAN and GOKEY discussed sidewalks for the development. Ms. Reckert advised that the building permit required sidewalks to be installed on both frontages. Commissioner BRINKMAN expressed concern about dead-end sidewalks. Commissioner GOKEY asked if the sidewalks would be consistent with ADA requirements. Mr. Goebel replied that they would meet the ADA standards. Commissioner COLLINS asked about the fence along 32nd Avenue. Mr. Goebel informed that some residents have expressed concern about sight distance as they are pulling out onto 32nd Avenue and the City is requesting that the fence be moved back onto the property line. Commissioner GOKEY asked if a neighborhood meeting had been held concerning this development. Ms. Reckert replied that neighborhood meetings were not required for subdivisions. Chair THOMPSON asked about irrigation ditch. Mr. Goebel replied that it would remain open with a 4-foot chain link fence at the top between the ditch and the multi-family units. In response to a question from Commissioner BRINKMAN, Mr. Goebel replied that a traffic light for the entrance would not be required. Commissioner COLLINS asked about the retention pond. Mr. Goebel replied that the design is required to retain a 100-year storm. The applicant addressed the Commission. Alec Garbini 1546 Cole Boulevard, Suite #227, Golden Mr. Garbini was sworn by Chair THOMPSON. He stated that he was the architect for the project and was appearing on behalf of Saulsbury Properties who originally planned to remodel the existing converted horse stall apartments but have now decided to replace them with the present plan. He informed that the applicant planned to save as many of the trees as possible and that the plan would allow more open space than presently exists. He submitted plans and elevations for the buildings for the Commission to review. These plans were then Planning Commission Page 8 06/18/98 offered to members of the audience who wished to review them. He stated there is no access planned onto 32nd Avenue and that there would be an emergency gate at the end of the 24- foot wide private street which would allow fire trucks to break through in case of emergency. He commented that trash trucks could be given a key to the gate by the manager allowing them to drive through , or a hammerhead configuration could be constructed. In reference to guest parking, he stated that the duplexes have a two-car garage design with one parking space in front of each duplex which would provide three parking spaces for each duplex which was in excess of the requirements. He stated there would be an extension of the white picket fence the entire length of the property and that a new sidewalk would be installed on Saulsbury that would connect to 32nd Avenue. In reply to a question from Commissioner GOKEY, Mr. Garbini replied that each multi- family unit will have two bedrooms and the duplexes would average three bedrooms. Commissioner GOKEY asked about the well on the site. Mr. Garbini replied that it was an adjudicated well that would be used in conjunction with ditch rights to irrigate the lawns and landscaping on the property. THOMPSON expressed concern regarding children's safety with large vehicles such as moving vans having to back out 300 feet to get from Teller to Saulsbury. Mr. Garbini replied that the gate could be used in such instances. He commented that the gate is to be installed to satisfy neighborhood concerns that it not be a through street. Mr. Garbini replied to Commissioner SNOW'S concern about maintenance of the street if the property were sold and stated that a homeowners association would be formed and new owners would be subject to the covenants and maintenance agreement of the association. During discussion of parking, Ms. Reckert suggested that parking restrictions for RV, trailer and boats could be instituted. The applicant was agreeable to this. Commissioner BRINKMAN asked about curb, gutters and sidewalks. Mr. Garbini replied that they are required to extend the sidewalk for the apartments and would like to end the sidewalk at the point where the private street enters back into the property rather than extending it to a dead-end. Ms. Reckert advised that only City Council has the authority to waive curb, gutter and sidewalk requirements. During discussion on drainage, Mr. Garbini advised that the engineers for the project have concluded that, even with paving and improvements on the site, there will be less water leaving the site than is presently the case. The following individuals were signed up to speak before the Commission: Thomas Slattery 6869 West 32nd Avenue Planning Commission Page 9 06/18/98 Mr. Slattery was sworn by Chair THOMPSON. Mr. Slattery questioned the legality of the R-3 zone designation. He commented that, since no construction was occurring on the property, that it was misleading to indicate that there would be a hardship to the applicant if subdivision was not granted. He expressed concern that Lot 4 would not be buildable with, the required drainage easement. He did not believe the development fit in with the established character of the neighborhood and believed there was a precedent for denial of any R-3 use in the area because an application made in the 1980's was denied by City Council on the basis of incompatibility with the neighborhood. He did not believe that the developer had proven conformance with the zoning and subdivision code and asked that the request be denied. Discussion followed. Mr. Slattery felt that if the units were to be sold, single ownership would no longer exist. Commissioner GOKEY asked Mr. Garbini if the property were owned by one individual at this time and if development would be by one individual. Mr. Garbini replied that this was the case and, if sold, the property would be subject to covenants set forth in the homeowners association and responsible for all improvements. Ms. Reckert commented that the homeowners association would be responsible for maintenance of the detention area. Commissioner BRINKMAN referred to the subdivision regulations that require drainage areas to be left in a natural state with no encroachments on the natural channel areas and requiring that any land subject to a 100-year flood should not be platted for occupancy unless adequate provisions were made to eliminate and control flood hazards as they apply to area being developed. She also clarified that the R-3 property was not being addressed at this meeting other than where it directly affects the R-2 subdivision request. Commissioner SNOW commented that the applicant already has the building permit. Mr. Slattery felt the building permit was not legal. Lisa Hamilton Fieldman 712 West Mud Avenue Ms. Fieldman was sworn by Chair THOMPSON. She expressed concern about losing trees on the property. She did not believe the Lot 4 would be buildable with the drainage easement. She asked the reason for the single family residence on the property being up for rent when the applicant had indicated it would be torn down after being used for a construction office. She expressed concern about parking and increased traffic which would be generated by the development. In regard to the gate, she suggested that the end of the street be widened to more than 30 feet, and that the street be placed around a traffic island which would allow delivery trucks, etc. to turn around. Chair THOMPSON asked if the detention pond area could be used for play structures, trees, etc. Meredith Reckert replied restrictions on the plat would not allow that to occur. During discussion of the retention pond, Mr. Goebel stated that the exact size of the grass Planning Commission Page 10 06/18/98 pond would not be determined until final drainage review was completed. Commissioner GOKEY asked if the structure on lot 4 would be in danger of a 100 year storm. Mr. Goebel replied that they are working to allow more space between the structure and the pond to ensure that the structure would not be in danger. Catherine Dunlap 7160 West 30th Ms. Dunlap was sworn by Chair THOMPSON. She stated that there is no storm sewer system in the area at all and a large pool of water forms at 30th and Saulsbury and stays for several days. She expressed concern that there would be no traffic light at the entrance to the unit from Saulsbury. She also expressed concern about car lights shining into neighbors windows as they enter and exit the development as well as increased traffic flow in the area which would be generated by the development. She was concerned about the possibility of lowering water tables for neighborhood wells if the developer used his well for irrigation. She was also concerned about the possibility of decreased public water pressure which is already low in the area. She stated her opposition to building an apartment complex in the middle of low density housing and expressed her opinion that the developer didn't care about the neighborhood but was only interested in making money. Commissioner SNOW commented that the only decision that was before the Commission was to decide how to subdivide the land. She asked Ms. Dunlap if she had any suggestions about the traffic. Ms. Dunlap felt that it would be the best plan to exit onto 32nd Avenue. She indicated that she was in agreement with the plans as far as the border of trees on the perimeter of the property was concerned. Albert Holland 1633 West 78th Place Mr. Holland was sworn by Chair THOMPSON. Mr. Holland owns the lot adjacent to the south of the subject property and spoke in favor of the plan. He expressed concern about the retention pond interfering with his plans to build a driveway on his property and how water from the ditch running along the east side of Teller would be brought onto his property. He felt that installation of curb and gutter would be a hindrance in that regard. He was also concerned about increase in traffic. In response to a question from Commissioner GOKEY, Mr. Holland replied that he wanted to see some infrastructure built into the plan to allow him to take water from the ditch. Mr. Goebel replied that this matter would be addressed. Mr. Holland also indicated agreement with the installation of the gate at the end of the street. Margaret Parry 3060 Teller Street Planning Commission Page 11 06/18/98 Chair THOMPSON stated that Ms. Parry has indicated to the City that she is in opposition to the subdivision. Chair THOMPSON then asked if there were individuals who had not signed the public hearing roster but wished to speak. The following individuals addressed the Commission: Martin Burrows 7200 West 31st Place Mr. Burrows was sworn by Chair THOMPSON. He stated that he lives directly across the street from the proposed development and expressed concern about increase in traffic. He did not believe there was a place for any safe entrance into the development. He also expressed concern about lowering water tables and decreased water pressure. He expressed opposition to the project because it would have a negative impact on the neighborhood, and asked that the Planning Commission research the subdivision laws before making a decision. Chair THOMPSON asked Ms. Reckert if the proposed development complied with all subdivision regulations. Ms. Reckert replied that it did. In response to a question from Chair THOMPSON, Mr. Goebel advised that the subdivision regulations and street design guide require 125 feet between streets if they are offset and that it would not be a good idea to have three access points onto 32nd Street all within 300 feet of each other. Chair THOMPSON asked if additional parking could be required on the 12-unit side to alleviate parking needs for the duplexes. Mr. Goebel replied that there would be an area designated as common area which could be used for extra parking. Commissioner GOKEY commented that using the common space for parking could result in the loss of some of the more mature trees on the property. Joann Howard 7260 West 31st Place Ms. Howard was sworn by Chair THOMPSON. She stated that it was her understanding the owner had previously indicated he was building a development for senior citizens and now his plans have changed. She was concerned about increased traffic in the area. She said there was an existing driveway on 32nd next to the RTD bus pad. She did not want to see an access onto Teller. She was also concerned that the development would not be maintained. Commissioner SNOW asked Mr. Goebel about a right-in only entrance from 32nd. He replied that it would be necessary to have right turn lane installed for this to happen. Commissioner BRINKMAN asked for clarification as to whether construction on the multi- family units could proceed even if the subdivision plat were not approved at this time. Ms. Planning Commission Page 12 06/18/98 Reckert replied that it could proceed and that if the application is denied, the applicant could come back with a different subdivision plan or appeal to the City Council. Mr. Garbini returned to the podium to respond to concerns raised by the previous speakers. In regard to the retention pond, Mr. Garbini stated that the engineer felt this was the best solution and would result in saving more trees and reiterated the applicant's sincere desire to save as many trees as possible. He commented that there will be some offsite improvements which will benefit the neighborhood such as the widened street, curb and gutter. He stated that the reason there is no construction taking place at the present time is that, although they have already paid for the fire hydrants, they are waiting to get them installed which is a requirement of the fire department before any demolition or construction can take place. In regard to water pressure, he stated the required looping would increase the size of the water line on Saulsbury thereby increasing water pressure. In regard to the well, he indicated he would check to see if a permit had been obtained. He estimated the number of residents on the property to be around fifty and clarified that they were never planning to build a senior' citizen development but wanted to build a development that would be attractive to people in the Wheat Ridge area. He noted that half of the apartments are ground floor and handicapped accessible as are the duplexes He stated that the site could handle ten single family units, but would not allow as much open space as the present plan. He also stated that he was not aware of the ditch issue concerning Mr. Holland's property but would work with the City and adjacent land owners to provide a swail across the property and would be in agreement with asking the City Council to waive the curb and gutter requirements. In regard to traffic, he commented that he has worked with the City's recommendations. He informed that the picket fence will be rebuilt rather than using chain link fence. In conclusion he informed that, because of vandalism to the property, the house has been rented for a 4-month period in order to have some security on the premises. In response to questions from the Commission, Ms. Reckert stated that average household size in Wheat Ridge in the 1990 census was 2.2 persons per household. In response to comments regarding low density, single family housing in the neighborhood, Mr. Garbini noted that five of the adjacent properties already contained duplexes or group housing. Catherine Dunlap addressed the commission on behalf of the previous speakers who were in opposition to the subdivision. She again expressed concern about the traffic and noted that 32nd Avenue handles a lot of funeral home traffic also. She stated that the majority of people in the neighborhood did not want to see the development take place. She felt that the Saulsbury exit would be preferable to other options. She asked that the City look into installing a stop sign at 30th and Saulsbury as well as the possibility of installing storm drains in the area. It was moved by Commissioner BRINKMAN and seconded by Commissioner SNOW that Case No. MS-98-3, a request for approval of a four-lot minor subdivision on property zoned R-2 and R-3 located at 3195 Saulsbury Street, be recommended to the City Council for Planning Commission Page 13 06/18/98 APPROVAL for the following reasons: 1. Zoning on the property is R-2 and R-3. 2. A subdivision is required to allow development of the south half of the property. 3. All requirements of the Subdivision Regulations have been met. With the following conditions: 1 Note #6 on the front page be corrected to accurately reflect existing zoning (150 feet versus 165 feet.) 2. A note be added that no perimeter fencing is allowed along the eastern side of Lot 1 on Saulsbury Street. 3. The private street/access way be posted "no parking" for fire lane purposes. 4. A note be added that the access way be posted as a fire lane and that property owners are responsible for maintenance. 5. A note be added to the front page that driveways for Lots 2, 3 and 4 be at least 20 feet long from the southern edge of the private street. 6. That a homeowners association be formed to cover maintenance of the private street, ditch and detention areas. 7. That the private street be blocked by a gate on the western end adjacent to Teller Street and that the parking on Teller adjacent to the private street be posted as no parking. 8. That the plan be revised to devise a plan for continuing the ditch flow and provide diversion boxes for all nearby residents who have ditch rights, and that existing ditch be maintained. 9. That a hammerhead turnaround be installed at the end of the private street as approved by the Public Works Department. 10. A line should be clearly delineated on the plan showing the division between R-2 and R-3 properties. Commissioner COLLINS moved that the plan be amended to require a catch basin at the end of the retention pond to connect to the storm sewer. The motion died for lack of a second. Discussion followed. Chair THOMPSON expressed concern about driveways being used for parking and asked if additional parking could be added to the plan. Ms. Reckert replied that they will work with the applicant in this regard. Commissioner GOKEY commented that if more asphalt is required, wiping out more vegetation, more problems could be created thansolved. He expressed his opinion that the developer did admirable job which addresses most of the issues. The motion passed by a vote of 6-1, with Commissioner COLLINS voting no 8. CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING Chair THOMPSON declared the public hearing portion of the meeting closed. Planning Commission Page 14 06/18/98 I 4~' 1 LLJ a W ;I I ! ~ ~I I r a Ii J ul I J IW 1 _ I EST 31ST PL C 4 0 ~ , AT T"RNCT STEADVALK SEE TELLER IMPROVEMENTS ROV--- SIREET y - - I I f 1 I I ' r 1 SPMRLyrRKIQNO h. _ >z =FAQ _ .l . - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I -{I~ I 32ND AVENUE w x o~d ~ 60' ROW - I 3 ZN \ - e WI.W ~-LOT _]yHLOCR 2. HRRTH 5 SI1H➢IVIS➢41- _ mu 117- _Ta<rrlcsDVSC[ ' ~ ExisrwG FtNCE t I : o$ 'rITfN ♦ L _ ~ III ~S la.`QiETE AL - - K, . , - I _ I 1J I i 11 =qJ - - -LJ f I1 I aaw III I ~ IF h ~ . I ~I 1 FFE = 5469.00 r 00% ID It It Lr) ! 30.0• • 1 H• '-I I II LL. W. ~ FFE 5469 50-1 L f e- . I WELL ` ~ I' Ij L- Y F - of S--gq !®j ~ o IIIII y~ _ li l l J ~ - ' . ` - ! III I 0 f; ,,{{,,59 SI EVRLK CHAS oNo .d, {$'R I ~ I I 14F - t •t 4` ~ l I tRQ as ~s•51.. 4 14 1~46~ (yp NEW CURB CX[jT j, PRIVATE RGfF•$$ DRIVE SEE SEE ➢E7A EIRIL S i I - .r~l ee..oeEar z- GRAPHIC SCALE _ _ ,1 1 ~ pf ; 'SI I 1R H6S - i I i - I ; ; Ib-n_sa EE I , I I1 a N sp O I, p~TAIL p~~~ SH O~ETIE 1 OF WAY a CR[ GNT WRY I I CO NEW CURH.TER L ATTACHED t I SdEVRLK CITY 6 Vr¢RT RD7Gf R Y r 11 ➢ET ILS SEE M IMPADVEIff1PS PL NS LEGEND 300• I II I I i I ~ " n II SEES DETTA SHEETS 4 I VATGR EXISTING WATER LINE ' µM GI M3Er I JAIf" - - EXISTING WINTER CON➢0IT - 1 I - ' - O EXISTING HYDRANT I - H EXISTING GATE VALVE n ; I SANI'ARY- EXISTING SANITARY SEWER R j ~ ' i II I -----;marl----- EXISTING STORM SEVER _ ISTLt@ Fp: i 111 . _ "v--------- EXISTING HANHDLE ii i - EXISTING INLET ~ _ is v EXISTING GAS MAIN [ EXISTING ELECTRIC r EXISTING TELEPHONE - EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER NEW CURB AND GUTTER _ - - _ - - NEV CURB AND GUTTER CSPILL) ° 1777777777771 NEV ASPHALT PAVEMENT A~ ~W ❑.y~ 2 6pymj W 6~~bN ~M1'W PP NN OOJC = W J~4 = W J Z W z Q IL Q z V ~Q Z Fr v^- J REVISIONS DATE:7/21/1998 DESIGN:P.F 08-071093 G1.DWG SHEET N0: 1 RECEIVED JUN 1 1 Director of Planning City of Wheat Ridge 7500 W. 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge CO 80215-5713 Dear Sir: 1235 3verett Ct. Lakewood CO 80215 9 June 1998 Thank you for informing me of the zoning change request (Case no !!S 8-0 for large multi-family buildings naar the corner of Saulsbury and gnus, Our property is directly east across Salsbury directly south of the Rocky Htn Dit c a, I would much rather see down-zoning to single family residences, reflecting the vast majority of housing in this area of fitte Wheat Ridge homes. Trees and other vegetation are rapidly disappearing in Wheat Ridge and elsewhere as more and more buildings get constructed on formerly green spaces. Those mature trees and patch of bushes and the white fence southwest of the Saulsbury and 32nd Avenue corner are special. Because of this) please request firm stipulations of the developer to preserva all the vegetation south of 32nd Avenue and north of where the tiny apartments used to be. cc: Bill Cassel, Forester Sincerely, Lynn A. Yehle ATTACHMENT 4 CM2, Inc. MANAGEMENT Suite 227, 1546 Cole Boulevard, Golden, CO 80401 Tel: 303-233-3447 / Fax: 303-239-8616 MEMORANDUM Date: July 10, 1998 Subject: Happy Landings / Common Area Maintenance To: Meredith Reckert From: Alec Garbini At the time the subdivision of the subject property was granted by the City of Wheat Ridge, the lots created by this action were owned by a single entity Saulsbury Properties, LLLP. It is understood and agreed by Saulsbury Properties, LLLP. that as a condition of the conveyance of any of these lots to a third party not under the control of Saulsbury Properties, LLLP., that a property owners association be formed for the maintenance of the common elements. We suggest the following language: "Prior to the sale of any lot by the land owner, the land owner shall form a homeowners association and prepare and file of record covenants and conditions concerning the maintenance and upkeep of all common elements including, but not limited to private road, and common drainage pond." Please let me know if this is acceptable language. ATTACHMENT 5 vui-~7-7a lu_11 ~Mr uacoini t1 OV O-GJ~J-D010 r_uc ~r CMZ, Inc. MANAGEMENT 1546 Cole Boulevard, Suite 227, Golden, CO 80401 Tel: 303-233-3447 1 Fax: 303-239-8616 July 9, 1998 Meredith Reckert City of Wheat Ridge Planning Department 7500 West 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80215-6713 Re: Happy Landings Subdivision In response to your question about the detention pond and drainage options available for the Happy Landings project, please be aware of the following. The site is relatively flat with approximately a five foot drop in elevation from the flow line on Teller Street to the new street section being constructed as part of this project on Saulsbury. Therefore the natural slope of the site is 1.5%. The natural slope of the site is to the southeast as a result of the original agricultural development of the property which used surface irrigation originating from laterals along Teller and the Rocky Mountain Ditch. The ditch company prohibits new construction from draining any runoff into the ditch. They were even concerned that we showed downspouts on the north side of the proposed apartment building. This required that we accentuate the drainage to the south east comer of the site. The Planning Dept. was concerned that. we minimize the disturbance of the grades adjacent to the edge of the lot on the south. The result of trying to accommodate the various interested parties was to develop a series of very shallow swales leading to a collection area on the south east corner of the site. The engineers have designed this area to detain ATTACHMENT 6 vu i-uy->a tu:lt u~•ic ~aa rc~ini -rl ouo-col-oolo r.uo minor storms as well as the 100 year storm flows as required by the city, and to release the water at no more than historic rates from the site. We believe the size of detention pond may be reduced by creating another pond north of the interior parking lot, adjacent to Saulsbury. To do this we must remove a number of substantial trees which appear to be in good health. Because of that, we have chosen to consolidate the drainage in an area where there are no existing trees. The existing natural drainage along the flow line of the street is currently to the south. In order to connect to the existing storm drain in 32nd Ave. we would need to build a 300 foot long storm sewer below Saulsbury flowing north. The bottom of the Rocky Mountain Ditch lies approximately six feet below the intersection of Saulsbury and 32nd. The elevations of the ditch and the existing 36" storm sewer below 32nd Ave. appear to be parallel to each other. In order to run below the ditch, we would fall below the intercept point with the existing storm sewer in 32nd. This is a technically infeasible solution. Please consider that the design solution presented meets the City of Wheat Ridge requirements, and that the discharge from this detention pond is in conformance with City requirements. Under this design, even though the volume of flow will increase as the result of paving the future rate of discharge will actually be less than currently exists at this site. Please call me if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, Alec Garbini Project Manager for Saulsbury Properties, LLLP. 6, 1998, be added under the Public Hearing portion of the agenda for the purpose of continuing to August 20, 1998. It was moved by Commissioner SNOW and seconded by Commissioner COLLINS to approve the agenda with the requested amendments. The motion carried by a vote of 8-0. 5. _ APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the July 16, 1998 Wheat Ridge Planning Commission were presented for approval. It was moved by Commissioner SNOW and seconded by Commissioner SHOCKLEY that the minutes be approved as presented. The motion carried by a vote of 8-0. 6. PUBLIC FORUM There was no one signed up to speak before the Commission. PUBLIC HEARING A. Case No. MS-98-03: An application by Alec Garbini, CM2 Management, for Saulsbury Properties, LLC for approval of a minor subdivision of four lots for residential apartments and duplexes. Said property is zoned R-2 and R-3 and located at 3195 Saulsbury Street. Meredith Reckert explained that this case had proceeded to City Council to be heard during their August 24, 1998, Council meeting. Chair THOMPSON announced that a public hearing would not be held at this time. B.. Case No. WS-98-01: An application by Lynn and Nancy Fightmaster for approval of a nine-lot combined preliminary and final subdivision plat on Residential-Three zoned property located at 11681 West 44th Avenue and 11680 West 46th Avenue. Street. Due to insufficient information from the applicant, it was staff s recommendation that the Planning Commission continue this case to an indefinite date. Chair THOMPSON announced that a public hearing would not be held at this time. C. Case No. WZ-98-13: An application by The Chesrown Automotive Group for approval of a Planned Commercial Development amended Outline Development Plan and a Planned Commercial Development combined Preliminary and Final Development Plan. Said property is zoned PCD and located at 3601 Wadsworth Boulevard. Planning Commission Page 2 08/06/98 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge PLANNING COMMISSION on August 6, 1998, at 7:30 p.m. at 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. The following petitions shall be heard: Case No. MS-98-03: An application submitted by Saulsbury Properties for approval of a minor subdivision with variances for four lots for residential apartments and duplexes. Said property is zoned R-2 and R-3 and located at 3195 Saulsbury Street and legally described as follows: A replat of the North 3/4 of the North 3/5 of the West %2 of Lot 1, Block 2 Barth's Subdivision, a subdivision in the Southeast one-quarter of Section 26, Township 3 South; Range 69 West, of the 6" Principal Meridian, City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado. Barbara Delgadillo, Recording Secretary ATTEST: Wanda Sang, City ler To be Published: Wheat Ridge Transcript Date: July 17, 1998 AA8-06publicationmpd r-'IS- 9F-a3 8. " CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING Chair THOMPSON declared the public hearing portion of the meeting closed. 9. OLD BUSINESS A. Saulsbury and Teller Development - Commissioner SNOW requested that staff investigate the storm drain situation in this area before the matter is heard by City Council. She stated that even though the nearest storm drain was reported to be at 26th and Pierce, she has recently learned that there is a storm drain at the intersection of the subject property..- Mr. White commented that this matter may be coming before the Planning Commission again as a result of redesigning the property. B. Sign Code - Commissioner SNOW requested staff to investigate the large banners and signs at Friendly Ford to see if they are in compliance with the sign code. C. Brewer Property - Commissioner SNOW requested an update on the situation of whether or not the back property was being used for sales. Mr. White stated that staff sent a letter to the owner explaining that if such activity were taking place, it would be a violation of City regulations. D. Industrial Park at 44th and Eldridge - Chair THOMPSON expressed concern about approving an application when it was found necessary to place sixteen conditions on the approval. She wanted the City Council to understand that the Planning Commission had concerns with the amount of traffic which will be generated by the project as well as the safety of trucks turning in and out of the project. Commissioner GOKEY asked for clarification regarding fire protection for Case No. WZ-98-12. It was reported that the development was in the Arvada Fire Protection District, but is actually within the Wheat Ridge Volunteer Fire Department. Mr. White advised that staff would make that correction. 10. NEW BUSINESS There was no new business. 11. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. City Review of Schools - Mr. White referred to his memorandum of July 9, 1998 to the Planning Commission concerning the city's purview in reviewing plans for schools and the relationship between the charter school and R-1 School District, the summary of which was Planning Commission Page 9 07/16/98 %A4 E `500 WEST 29TH AVENUE The City of P O. BOX 638 WHEAT RIDGE. CO 80034-CE-S x,303) 234-5900 cWheat City Admin. Fax 234-5924 Police Deot. Pax: 235 2949 -1\idge POSTING CERTIFICATION CASE NO. SAS ' ~B ' 3 PLANNING COMMISSION - CITY COUNCIL - BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (Circle One) HEARING DATE: ~C wm n ~IqA (n a m e) o, residing at 3(0 sno" sr. ~ye_-' g Co (a d d r e s s) as the applicant for Case No. AS • gig -3 , hereby certify that I have posted the Notice of Public Hearing at 31q S S4v~s~,r~Y Sr 3 10 -I EU,0- %rr-- (1 o c a t i o n) on this LO day of JV W , 19 and do hereby certify that said sign has been posted and remained in place for fifteen (15) days prior to and including the scheduled day of public hearing of this case. The sign was posted in the position shown on the map below. I Signature: NOTE: This form must be submitted at the public hearing o his case and will be placed in the applicant's case file at the Department of Planning and Development. <p re 7ne City of 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80215 G%Vheat 9Ridge July 7, 1998 Dear Property Owner: This is to inform you that Case No. MS-98-03 which is a request for approval of a minor subdivision of an R-2/R-3 zoned property into 4 lots located at 3195 Saulsbury Street will be heard by the Wheat Ridge City Council in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue. The meeting will be held on July 27, 1998, at 7:00 p.m. All owners and/or their legal counsel of the parcel under consideration must be present at this hearing. As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to notify any other persons whose presence is desired at this hearing. If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2846. Thankyou. Planning Division. A;V.0803cert1emr.wpd J (303) 234-5900 • ADMINISTRATION FAX: 234-5924 POLICE DEPARTMENT FAX: 235-2949 G D N w d D v 'U : O W 'u N N v c ~ .e a N Q U v o Z ~ v c ? vi ~ v a y c a > a •v U l v v N d m - D n Y wo O .r .r p~ O C m N = N v m 'o L 0 U O # m "O C N N O O O O O O w :C a m U rn rn m m m m Q E E E E E E N ` a Q ai u C O N M s ° ) M c M- a m~ E d m t mo mOO N o im a N m 0of m E= m Q 0 "EaU a 2i m0 _ s m v Y20 o Q 0 2 N 3 V L N N -O M U O 0 = U .00 N N N ` 2 c 'o O. M OI D N p "O O W ~i N T W J O M O) Oj Q VI Z mD > f4>fL LL m >v QM N y~M 3 a' > lG N 41 r O r N N O N N N N Z d R O N N m V IJ L 2O r N ¢ y N r j. > J J I~ j > oN C - m ) ~ N C'~ a (D _0 O ~ K u Q M a o C w x w C O 0 m ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ z v N W N a i III Q Q M M N l M M M 0 W d (OO t00 (OO E; W O E m m m rn m m U ' Z a a W W ~ CD N o Q a } O W CD :r Un~ ~I 0 a W h O P. N S1 z z„ ~ U H 'UO p N a O N z y F D m N 3~ C d ~ d 'U C W N N '0 c Q v U u ~ o Z R y ~ NI c ~ a v K ~ ~ a D v u I 0 ~ R K N d N _ d R N w r N O a wno ' N R 'p = E o n„ V E o m ik R a C N ~ N R p O O O O O W %'C 'O U ~ N N N N N Q$ ,°a E E E E E E N R a Q u •C C O N N Mon J O ~O R ~O O W a - R O c c W t O O ° w R O R O x° y R W ' 0 a R E WQo O E a 3: w 0 ~L° d Y d 0 oQ o m a U U) R 0 O U a R c O U o 0 = r U c N U y c M O 02 c O.M I R a O 'O LL~ W2i~ T W . J.,o o I N y N ZN9 tn~~ 0 N 3 Q~ o xN _ N - y N I O N R R N y O y O R U d G N U ~ O r R ~ Q R N L R N r? J J > 1~> N_ y a ~ R c ~ ~-p NL~ N N a ~ Q uJ = Q E R ~ w ~ o w No mB o. K U U K o W LL 0 Z d LO r ti C Q M a v> ~o n m III N O [N`1 M M ~N'l M V 0 co d m m m m O E m m m rn m m F- > U z' Q Q W W U' N O Q a O W ~ LO ~I Jul-09-98 10:11 CM2 Garbini -1 303-239-8616 P.02 CM2, Inc. MANAGEMENT 1546 Cole Boulevard, Suite 227, Golden, CO 80401 Tel: 303-233-3447 / Fax: 303-239-8616 July 9, 1998 Meredith Reckert City of Wheat Ridge Planning Department 7500 West 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80215-6713 Re: Happy Landings Subdivision In response to your question about the detention pond and drainage options available for the Happy Landings project, please be aware of the following. The site is relatively flat with approximately a five foot drop in elevation from the flow line on Teller Street to the new street section being constructed as part of this project on Saulsbury. Therefore the natural slope of the site is 1.5%. The natural slope of the site is to the southeast as a result of the original agricultural development of the property which used surface irrigation originating from laterals along Teller and the Rocky Mountain Ditch. The ditch company prohibits new construction from draining any runoff into the ditch. They were even concerned that we showed downspouts on the north side of the proposed apartment building. This required that we accentuate the drainage to the south east corner of the site. The Planning Dept. was concerned that we minimize the disturbance of the grades adjacent to the edge of the lot on the south. The result of trying to accommodate the various interested parties was to develop a series of very shallow swales leading to a collection area on the south east comer of the site. The engineers have designed this area to detain Jul-09-98 10:11 CM2 Garbini +-1 303-239-8616 P.03 minor storms as well as the 100 year storm flows as required by the city, and to release the water at no more than historic rates from the site. We believe the size of detention pond may be reduced by creating another pond north of the interior parking lot, adjacent to Saulsbury. To do this we must remove a number of substantial trees which appear to be in good health. Because of that, we have chosen to consolidate the drainage in an area where there are no existing trees. The existing natural drainage along the flow line of the street is currently to the south. In order to connect to the existing storm drain in 32nd Ave. we would need to build a 300 foot long storm sewer below Saulsbury flowing north. The bottom of the Rocky Mountain Ditch lies approximately six feet below the intersection of Saulsbury and 32nd. The elevations of the ditch and the existing 36" storm sewer below 32nd Ave. appear to be parallel to each other. In order to run below the ditch, we would fall below the intercept point with the existing storm sewer in 32nd. This is a technically infeasible solution. Please consider that the design solution presented meets the City of Wheat Ridge requirements, and that the discharge from this detention pond is in conformance with City requirements. Under this design, even though the volume of flow will increase as the result of paving the future rate of discharge will actually be less than currently exists at this site. Please call me if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, Alec Garbini Project Manager for Saulsbury Properties, LLLP. 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE COLORADO 80215 The City of Wheat „9Ridge x ~ r June 29, 1998 y 5 n Mr. Paul von Fey, P.E. N `S 4A Henkels & McCoy, Inc r , ( 5er 4/ 3979 East Arapahoe Road, Suite 200 x` /A Littleton, Colorado 80122 Re: Happy Landings Subdivision, 3195 Saulsbury Street - Planning Commission Revisions to Drainage/Public Improvements Dear Mr. von Fey, As you may be aware, concerns expressed at the Planning Commission meeting held on June 18, 1998 require that the following revisions, as they relate to the Public Works Department, will need to be made to the proposed improvements for this project: 1. Asphalt transitions need to be appropriately placed at the southern ends of the Teller and Saulsbury Street improvements to redirect drainage back into the existing ditches at these locations, and to provide access to the new sidewalks. These improvements will need to be n shown on the plan and profile drawings. ~2. The proposed entrance from Saulsbury Street will need to be changed to the City's standard 3t` I curb cut improvement, instead of the ramping/cross-pan configuration shown. The proposed concrete trickle channel in the detention pond area needs to be eliminated to JJJ11 allow seepage into the groundwater table instead. 4. A 55-foot clear sight triangle needs to be designed for the southwest corner of West 32nd Avenue & Saulsbury Street. 5. Analysis/design needs to be provided regarding the feasibility of providing a sump inlet at the detention pond outlet structure to pipe these flows, and the Saulsbury Street design flows to the existing 36-inch CMP stone sewer system on the north side of West 32"d Avenue. i 6. In conjunction with item 5, a comprehensive analysis of offsite impacts with respect to the proposed drainage from this site is needed in order to accommodate downstream properties to the south. This is especially critical concerning Saulsbury Street. i (303 •5900 ADMINISTRATION FAX: 2345924 POLICE DEPARTMENT FAX: 235-2949 Mr. Paul von Fey, P.E. Henkels & McCoy, Inc. Page 2 7. The existing fence along the West 32"d Avenue frontage needs to be re-located to the south right-of-way line. 8. The appropriate improvements and easements if relocated, need to be constructed to accommodate the property owner's ditch rights from a lateral on the east side of Teller Street. 9. The appropriate walks need to be designed to provide access on to West 32"d Avenue, and ti Saulsbury Street. 10. A turn-around at the west end of the private drive must be constructed to accommodate large vehicles such as box moving vans and trash trucks. It is derstanding that Mr. Alec Garbini attended this meeting, and is aware of these items. If y ha any questions, please contact me at 235-2868. III / SiAc rely, Gr g 1; )n. P.A. Development Review Engineer cc: Bob Goebel, Public.Works Director Alan White, Planning & Development Director Dave Kotecki, Sr. Project Engineer Meredith Reckert, Sr. Planner File With the following condition: That the fire hydrant requested by the Arvada Fire District be placed no later than after the foundation has been constructed. The motion passed by a vote of 7-0. (Chair THOMPSON declared a recess at 8:20 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 8:30 P.M.) C. Case No. MS-98-03: A request by Saulsbury Properties for approval of a minor subdivision of four lots for residential apartments and duplexes. Said property is located at 3195 Saulsbury Street. Meredith Reckert distributed copies of the following exhibits which were then entered into the record and accepted by Chair THOMPSON: Exhibit A: Letter dated June 9, 1998 from Lynn Yehle, 1235 Everett Court, Lakewood, expressing his desire to see the subject property rezoned to single family residence and that all vegetation on the subject property between 32nd Avenue and the ditch be preserved. Exhibit B: Site and grading plan for Happy Landings Apartments. Ms. Reckert presented slides and overhead projections of the subject property. She entered the zoning ordinance, subdivision regulations, case file, packet materials and exhibits into the record which were accepted by Chair THOMPSON. She informed that the property was within the City of Wheat Ridge, that all notification and posting requirements had been met and there was jurisdiction to hear the case. Ms. Reckert informed that the applicant was requesting approval of a four-lot minor subdivision on the subject property which is split-zoned R-3 on the north half and R-2 on the south half. She presented a history of the case and informed that the property was formerly subject to a zone change request from R-2 and R-3 to Planned Residential Development (Case No. WZ-97-1). The application, a request to construct sixteen multi-family units, six duplex units and two single family lots was made on December 18, 1996, but was never forwarded to Planning Commission or City Council for public hearing. On February 22, 1997, Ordinance No. 1066 became effective which placed a moratorium on rezone applications to R-2, R-3, R-3A, R-2A and PRD zones. A series of ordinances were passed in the fall of 1997 which reduced the densities in R-3 from 21 units per acre to 12 units per acre. She informed that the application was subsequently withdrawn. Ms. Reckert stated that in May of 1998 the owner applied for and was granted a building permit for the construction of twelve multi-family units on the property zoned R-3 which was consistent with density established by Ordinance No. 1090. She informed that if the Planning Commission 06/18/98 Page,6,. , single family residence stays on the property, the buildable density for multi-family units would be reduced to nine units. She stated that the applicant had applied for approval of a subdivision to plat the southern portion (zoned R-2) into three duplex sites. Ms. Reckert reviewed the agency referrals and informed that all outside service agencies could serve the property with improvements paid for by the developer. She informed that Consolidated Mutual Water Company would require looping of a water main line between Teller and Saulsbury within the thirty-foot access way (private street); that the Wheat Ridge Fire Protection District would require a fire hydrant to be installed at the southwest corner and would not allow perimeter fencing to occur along the eastern side of Lot 1; and that Public Service requirements would have to be met. She informed that the Wheat Ridge Public Works Department required improvements to be constructed along the Teller and Saulsbury Street frontages, and that a drainage report was in the review process. She advised that the Parks and Recreation Commission had requested a 5% land value contribution in lieu of land dedication. Ms. Reckert reviewed the subdivision design. A common drive/private street would provide access to all four lots by way of a 30-foot easement located on the northern 24-foot portion of the R-2 lots and the southern six feet of Lot.1 and the access way had not been used to calculate allowable density. The utility easement/private street would span between Teller and Saulsbury. The Teller Street entrance would be gated for emergency access only with no parking allowed, and maintenance of the drive area would be responsibility of property owners. A 5-foot right-of-way dedication occurs along Saulsbury Street. All trees over one foot diameter which are in good health have been shown on the face of the plat and cannot be removed without review and approval of the City. The City Forester has worked with the applicant to evaluate health of trees on the property. The setback for duplex units would be measured from the property line and it was recommended that driveways and setbacks be at least twenty feet on the southern edge of the access way so off street parking would be assured. Ms. Reckert informed that it was staff s conclusion that a subdivision is required to allow construction on the southern R-2 portion of the property and that the private street/access way would be the best option available for internal access. Since all requirements for the Subdivision Regulations had been met, recommendation for approval was given with the following conditions: 1. Note #6 be corrected to accurately reflect existing zoning (150' vs. 165') - 2. A note be added that no perimeter fencing be allowed along the eastern side of Lot 1 for fire protection purposes. 3. The private streettaccess way be posted "no parking" for fire lane purposes and maintained by the owners within the subdivision. 4. A note be added that driveways for Lots 2, 3, and 4 be at least 20 feet long from the southern edge of the private street. Planning Commission Pale 7 06/18/98 Commissioner SNOW expressed concern about maintenance of the private street if any of the duplexes or apartments were to be sold. Ms. Reckert replied that it would be appropriate for the Commission to require a homeowners association with protective covenants which 1 would ensure maintenance of the roadway. Chair THOMPSON expressed concern about guest parking for duplexes. Ms. Reckert informed that the building permit required at least three guest spaces for the multi-family units which is consistent with code. She noted that there was no guest parking requirement for single family residences. - Commissioners BRINKMAN and GOKEY discussed sidewalks for the development. Ms. Reckert advised that the building permit required sidewalks to be installed on both frontages. Commissioner BRINKMAN expressed concern about dead-end sidewalks. Commissioner GOKEY asked if the sidewalks would be consistent with ADA requirements. Mr. Goebel replied that they would meet the ADA standards. Commissioner COLLINS asked about the fence along 32nd Avenue. Mr. Goebel informed that some residents have expressed concern about sight distance as they are pulling out onto 32nd Avenue and the City is requesting that the fence be moved back onto the property line. Commissioner GOKEY asked if a neighborhood meeting had been held concerning this development. Ms. Reckert replied that neighborhood meetings were not required for subdivisions. Chair THOMPSON asked about irrigation ditch. Mr. Goebel replied that it would remain open with a 4-foot chain link fence at the top between the ditch and the multi-family units. In response to a question from Commissioner BRINKMAN, Mr. Goebel replied that a traffic light for the entrance would not be required. Commissioner COLLINS asked about the retention pond. Mr. Goebel replied that the design is required to retain a 100-year storm. The applicant addressed the Commission. Alec Garbini 1546 Cole Boulevard, Suite #227, Golden Mr. Garbini was sworn by Chair THOMPSON. He stated that he was the architect for the project and was appearing on behalf of Saulsbury Properties who originally planned to remodel the existing converted horse stall apartments but have now decided to replace them with the present plan. He informed that the applicant planned to save as many of the trees as possible and that the plan would allow more open space than presently exists. He submitted plans and elevations for the buildings for the Commission to review. These plans were then Planning Commission Page 8_ 06/18/98 offered to members of the audience who wished to review them. He stated there is no access planned onto 32nd Avenue and that there would be an emergency gate at the end of the 24- foot wide private street which would allow fire trucks to break through in case.of i ' emergency. lie commented that trash trucks could be given a key to the gate by the manager allowing them to drive through, or a hammerhead configuration could be constructed. In reference to guest parking, he stated that the duplexes have a two-car garage design with one parking space in front of each duplex which would provide three parking spaces for each duplex which was in excess of the requirements. He stated there would be an extension of the white picket fence the entire length of the property and that a new sidewalk would be installed on Saulsbury that would connect to 32nd Avenue. In reply to a question from Commissioner GOKEY, Mr. Garbini replied that each multi- family unit will have two bedrooms and the duplexes would average three bedrooms. Commissioner GOKEY asked about the well on the site. Mr. Garbini replied that it was an adjudicated well that would be used in conjunction with ditch rights to irrigate the lawns and landscaping on the property. THOMPSON expressed concern regarding children's safety with large vehicles such as moving vans having to back out 300 feet to get from Teller to Saulsbury. Mr. Garbini replied that the gate could be used in such instances. He commented that the gate is to be .installed to satisfy neighborhood concerns that it not be a through street. Mr. Garbini replied to Commissioner SNOW'S concern about maintenance of the street if the property were sold and stated that a homeowners association would be formed and new owners would be subject to the covenants and maintenance agreement of the association. During discussion of parking, Ms. Reckert suggested that parking restrictions for RV, trailer and boats could be instituted. The applicant was agreeable to this. Commissioner BRINKMAN asked about curb, gutters and sidewalks. Mr. Garbini replied that they are required to extend the sidewalk for the apartments and would like to end the sidewalk at the point where the private street enters back into the property rather than extending it to a dead-end. Ms. Reckert advised that only City Council has the authority to waive curb, gutter and sidewalk requirements. During discussion on drainage, Mr. Garbini advised that the engineers for the project have concluded that, even with paving and improvements on the site, there will be less water leaving the site than is presently the case. The following individuals were signed up to speak before the Commission: Thomas Slattery 6869 West 32nd Avenue Pladnin. Commission Pag ae 9 06/18/98 Mr. Slattery was sworn by Chair THOMPSON. Mr. Slattery questioned the legality of the R-3 zone designation. He commented that, since no construction was occurring on the property, that it was misleading to indicate that there would be a hardship to the applicant if ' subdivision was not granted. He expressed concern that Lot 4 would not be buildable with. the required drainage easement. He did not believe the development fit in with the established character of the neighborhood and believed there was a precedent for denial of any R-3 use in the area because an application made in the 1980's was denied by City Council on the basis of incompatibility with the neighborhood. He did not believe that the developer had proven conformance with the zoning and subdivision code and asked that-the request be denied. Discussion followed. Mr. Slattery felt that if the units were to be. sold, single ownership would no longer exist. Commissioner GOKEY asked Mr. Garbini if the property were owned by one individual at this time and if development would be by one individual. Mr. Garbini replied that this was the case and, if sold, the property would be subject to covenants set forth in the homeowners association and responsible for all improvements. Ms. Reckert commented that the homeowners association would be responsible for maintenance of the detention area. Commissioner BRINKMAN referred to the subdivision regulations that require drainage areas to be left in a natural state with no encroachments on the natural channel areas and requiring that any land subject to a 100-year flood should not be platted for occupancy unless adequate provisions were made to eliminate and control flood hazards as they apply to area being developed. She also clarified that the R-3 property was not being addressed at this meeting other than where it directly affects the R-2 subdivision request. Commissioner SNOW commented that the applicant already has the building permit. Mr. Slattery felt the building permit was not legal. Lisa Hamilton Fieldman 7125 West 32nd Avenue Ms. Fieldman was swom by Chair THOMPSON. She expressed concern about losing trees on the property. She did not believe the Lot 4 would be buildable with the drainage easement. She asked the reason for the single family residence on the property being up for rent when the applicant had indicated it would be tom down after being used for a construction office. She expressed concern about parking and increased traffic which would be generated by the development. In regard to the gate, she suggested that the end of the street be widened to more than 30 feet, and that the street be placed around a traffic island which would allow delivery trucks, etc. to turn around. Chair THOMPSON asked if the detention pond area could be used for play structures, trees, etc. Meredith Reckert replied restrictions on the plat would not allow that to occur. During discussion of the retention pond, Mr. Goebel stated that the exact size of the grass . Planning Commission Page 10 i 06/18/98 pond would not be determined until final drainage review was completed. Commissioner GOKEY asked if the structure on lot 4 would be in danger of a 100 year storm. Mr. Goebel replied that they are working to allow more space between the structure and the. pond to ensure that the structure would not be in danger. Catherine Dunlap 7160 West 30th Ms. Dunlap was sworn by Chair THOMPSON. She stated that there is no storm sewer- system in the area at all and a large pool of water forms at 30th and Saulsbury and stays for several days. She expressed concern that there would be no traffic light at the entrance to the unit from Saulsbury. She also expressed concern about car lights shining into neighbors windows as they enter and exit the development as well as increased traffic flow in the area which would be generated by the development. She was concerned about the possibility of lowering water tables for neighborhood wells if the developer used his well for irrigation. She was also concerned about the possibility of decreased public water piessure which is already low in the area. She stated her opposition to building an apartment complex in the middle of low density housing and expressed her opinion that the developer didn't care about the neighborhood but was only interested in making money. Commissioner SNOW commented that the only decision that was before the Commission was to decide how to subdivide the land. She asked Ms. Dunlap if she had any suggestions about the traffic. Ms. Dunlap felt that it would be the best plan to exit onto 32nd Avenue. She in that she was in agreement with the plans as far as the border of trees on the perimeter of the property was concerned. Albert Holland 1633 West 78th Place Mr. Holland was sworn by Chair THOMPSON. Mr. Holland owns the lot adjacent to the south of the subject property and spoke in favor of the plan. He expressed concern about the retention pond interfering with his plans to build a driveway on his property and how water from the ditch running along the east side of Teller would be brought onto his property. He felt that installation of curb and gutter would be a hindrance in that regard. He was also concerned about increase in traffic. In response to a question from Commissioner GOKEY, Mr. Holland replied that he wanted to see some infrastructure built into the plan to allow him to take water from the ditch. Mr. Goebel replied that this matter would be addressed. Mr. Holland also indicated agreement with the installation of the gate at the end of the street. Margaret Parry 3060 Teller Street j Planning Commission Page I I 06/18/98 , Chair THOMPSON stated that Ms. Parry has indicated to the City that she is in opposition to the subdivision. Chair THOMPSON then asked if there were individuals who had not signed the public hearing roster but wished to speak. The following individuals addressed the Commission: Martin Burrows 7200 West 31st Place Mr. Burrows was sworn by Chair THOMPSON. He stated that he lives directly across the street from the proposed development and expressed concern about increase in traffic. He did not believe there was a place for any safe entrance into the development. He also expressed concern about lowering water tables and decreased water pressure. He expressed opposition to the project because it would have a negative impact on the neighborhood, and asked that the Planning Commission research the subdivision laws before making a decision. Chair THOMPSON asked Ms. Reckert if the proposed development complied with all subdivision regulations. Ms. Reckert replied that it did. In response to a question from Chair THOMPSON, Mr. Goebel advised that the subdivision regulations and street design guide require 125 feet between streets if they are offset and that it would not be a good idea to have three access points onto 32nd Street all within 300 feet of each other. Chair THOMPSON asked if additional parking could be required on the 12-unit side to alleviate parking needs for the duplexes. Mr. Goebel replied that there would be an area designated as common area which could be used for extra parking. Commissioner GOKEY commented that using the common space for parking could result in the loss of some of the more mature trees on the property. Joann Howard 7260 West 31st Place Ms. Howard was sworn by Chair THOMPSON. She stated that it was her understanding the owner had previously indicated he was building a development for senior citizens and now his plans have changed. She was concerned about increased traffic in the area. She said there was an existing driveway on 32nd next to the RTD bus pad. She did not want to see an access onto Teller. She was also concerned that the development would not be. maintained. Commissioner SNOW asked Mr. Goebel about a right-in only entrance from 32nd. He replied that it would be necessary to have right turn lane installed for this to happen. Commissioner BRINKMAN asked for clarification as to whether construction on the multi- family units could proceed even if the subdivision plat were not approved at this time. Ms. Planning Commission Page 12 06/18/98 Reckert replied that it could proceed and that if the application is denied, the applicant could come back with a different subdivision plan or appeal to the City Council. Mr. Garbini returned to the podium to respond to concerns raised by the previous speakers. In regard to the retention pond, Mr. Garbini stated that the engineer felt this was the best solution and would result in saving more trees and reiterated the applicant's sincere desire to save as many trees as possible. He commented that there will be some offsite improvements which will benefit the neighborhood such as the widened street, curb and gutter. He stated that the reason there is no construction taking place at the present time is that, although-they have already paid for the fire hydrants, they are waiting to get them installed which is a requirement of the fire department before any demolition or construction can take place. In regard to water pressure, he stated the required looping would increase the size of the water line on Saulsbury thereby increasing water pressure. In regard to the well, he indicated he would check to see if a permit had been obtained. He estimated the number of residents on . the property to be around fifty and clarified that they were never planning to build a senior' citizen development but wanted to build a development that would be attractive to people in the Wheat Ridge area. He noted that half of the apartments are ground floor and handicapped accessible as are the duplexes He stated that the site could handle ten single family units, but would not allow as much open space as the present plan. He also stated that he was not aware of the ditch issue concerning Mr. Holland's property but would work with the City and adjacent land owners to provide a swail across the property and would be in agreement with asking the City Council to waive the curb and gutter requirements. In regard to traffic, he commented that he has worked with the City's recommendations. He informed that the picket fence will be rebuilt rather than using chain link fence. In conclusion he informed that, because of vandalism to the property, the house has been rented for a 4-month period in order to have some security on the premises. In response to questions from the Commission, Ms. Reckert stated that average household size in Wheat Ridge in the 1990 census was 2.2 persons per household. In response to comments regarding low density, single family housing in the neighborhood, Mr. Garbini noted that five of the adjacent properties already contained duplexes or group housing. Catherine Dunlap addressed the commission on behalf of the previous speakers who were in opposition to the subdivision. She again expressed concern about the traffic and noted that 32nd Avenue handles a lot of funeral home traffic also. She stated that the majority of people in the neighborhood did not want to see the development take place. She felt that the Saulsbury exit would be preferable to other options. She asked that the City look into installing a stop sign at 30th and Saulsbury as well as the possibility of installing storm drains in the area. It was moved by Commissioner BRINKMAN and seconded by Commissioner SNOW that Case No. MS-98-3, a request for approval of a four-lot minor subdivision on property zoned R-2 and R-3 located at 3195 Saulsbury Street, be recommended to the City Council for Planning Commission Pale ,13 06/18/98 APPROVAL for the following reasons: 1. Zoning on the property is R-2 and R-3. 2. A subdivision is required to allow development of the south half of the property. . 3. All requirements of the Subdivision Regulations have been met. With the following conditions: 1. Note #6 on the front page be corrected to accurately reflect existing zoning (159 feet versus 165 feet.) 2. A note be added that no perimeter fencing is allowed along the eastern side of Lot 1 on Saulsbury Street. 3. The private street/access way be posted "no parking" for fire lane purposes. 4. A note be added that the access way be posted as a fire lane and that property owners are responsible for maintenance. 5. A note be added to the front page that driveways for Lots 2, 3 and 4 be at least 20 feet long from the southern edge of the private street. 6. That a homeowners association be formed to cover maintenance of the private street, ditch and detention areas. 7. That the private street be blocked by a gate on the western end adjacent to Teller Street and that the parking on Teller adjacent to the private street be posted as no parking. 8. That the plan be revised to devise a plan for continuing the ditch flow and provide diversion boxes for all nearby residents who have ditch rights, and that existing ditch be maintained. 9. That a hammerhead turnaround be installed at the end of the private street as approved by the Public Works Department. 10. A line should be clearly delineated on the plan showing the division between R-2 and R-3 properties. Commissioner COLLINS moved that the plan'be amended to require a catch basin at the end of the retention pond to connect to the storm sewer. The motion died for lack of a second. Discussion followed. Chair THOMPSON expressed concern about driveways being used for parking and asked if additional parking could be added to the plan. Ms. Reckert replied that they will work with the applicant in this regard. Commissioner GOKEY commented that if more asphalt is required, wiping out more vegetation, more problems could be created thansolved. He expressed his opinion that the developer did admirable job which addresses most of the issues. The motion passed by a vote of 6-1, with Commissioner COLLINS voting no. 8. CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING Chair THOMPSON declared the public hearing portion of the meeting closed. Planning Commission Page 14 06/18/98 T.. U~ ~ IVISIO 1 T 1 i ~F I OT 1. RI OCK 7 RARTH'S SUBDIVISION 6, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST IDIAN STATE OF COLORADO t. MAYOR'S CERTIFICATE DEDICATION The foregoing plat is approved for filing; and conveypnce of the streets parcels and easements is acceptable by the City of Wheat Ridg e County State of Colorado, this day of _ 19___. Saulsbury Properties LLLP, being the owner(s) of the real property of 2.042 acres desc follows: NORTN 3/4 OF THE NORTH 3/5 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF LOT 1 BLOCK 2, A REPEAT OF THE NORTH 3/4 OF THE NCIRTH 3/5 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF BARTH'S SUBDIVISION COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, A SUBDIVISION IN THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 26, T OF 1HE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDI CITY OF WHEAT RTDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, ST FINAL PLAT STATE OF COLORADO and has laid oufi, subdivided and platted said land as per the drawi~~g hereon containe name and style of Happy Landings, a subdivision of a part of the fit-y of Wheat Ridge, Colorado, and by these presents does dedicate to the City of Wheat Ridge and t streets, roads and avenues and drives as shown on the accom anyir:g plat for the pub and does (do) further dedicate to the use of the Cit of Whea~ Ridgy and all municipa municipally franchised utilities and services those por~ions of said reral property which easements and rights-of-way for the construction, installation, operation, maintenance, .w replacement for a-II services, including without limiting the, generality of the foregoing, t electric lines, work, poles and underground. cables, gas pipelines, water pipelines, sanct street lights, culverts, hydrants, drainage ditches and drains and all appurtenances ther understood and agreed by the undersigned that all expenses and costs involved in con installing sanitary sewer system works and lines, gas service lines, electrical service wo sewers and drains, street lighting, grading and landscaping, curbs, nutters, street pave other such utilities and services shall be guaranteed and paid for by the subdivider or t described as P. the subdivider therefor which are approved by the City of Wheat Ridge, and such sums the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado, and that any item so consfiructed` or installed when 38th Avenue of Wheat Ridge, Colorado, shall became the sole property of said Ciiy except items ow franchised utilities and/or the Mountain States Telephone and Telegr~~h Company which constructed or installed, shall remain the property of the owner and shall not become City. SITE ~,I Holder of deed(s) of trust hereby releases claim to areas dedicated to public use. a  City of Wheat Ridge ~ 20th Avenue Director of Public Works S n 8 o e City of Wheat Ridge STATE OF COLOR)ADO) a Director of Parks and Recreation Cc~~m~mission COUNTY OF JEFFERSON) I The toregoiny instrument was acknowledged before me this day _ day of VICINITY MAP City of Wheat Ridge - A.D. 19-- bY Witness my hand and official seal. Director of Planning and Development My Commission expires NOTES ~F THE EMERGENCY AND SERVICE VEHICLE ACCESS EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON SH CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED BY THE OWNER AND SUBSEQUENT OWNERS, HEI SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. IN THE EVENT THAT SUCH CONSTRUCTION AND MAI IS NOT PERFORMED BY SAID OWNER, THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE SHALL HAVE T ENTER SUCH EASEMENTS AND PERFORM NECESSARY WORK, THE COST Of WHIC HEIRS, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS AGREES TO PAY UPON BILLING. City of Wheat Ridge City Engineer ~ - - Notary Public a. 2.) THE STORM DETENTION AREA SHOWN ON THE APPROVED DRAINAGE PLAN SHALL _4 COIJSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED BY THE OWNER AND SUBSEQUENT OWNERS, HEI AND ASSIGNS. IN THE EVENT THAT SUCH CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE IS HEIRS, ~~vIAINTEN NCE OWNERS PERFORMED BY SAID OWNER, THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE SHALL HAVE THE RIG P CORPORATION AREA AND PERFORM NECESSARY WORK, THE COST OF WHICH SAID OWNER, HEIR AVE THE RIGHT TO Rocky Mountain Water Company WHICH SAID OWNER, SAULSBURY PROPERTIES,LLLP, ACOLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP COR SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE - '~i~ AND ASSIGNS AGREES TO PAY UPON BILLING. SHALL BE Kenneth A. Perry a Registered Land Surveyor in the State of Colora HEIRS, SUCCESSORS of Ha py Landings Subdivision was made by me or directly under my s ~E IS NOT day o~ 19__.__, and that the accompanying plat subdivision and the survey thereof. BY: NO BUILDING OR STRUCTURE WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE DETENTION AREA A OR ALTERATIONS AFFECTING THE HYDRAULIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DETENTI0 BE MADE WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE CRY ENGINEER. HAROLD R. SMETHILLS, MANAGING PARTNER .~f 1546 COLE BOULEVARD SUITE 227 RIGHT TO ENTER SUCH ~sv~s~vzn r ~ r nsz GOLDEN, COLORADO 80401 (303) 233-3447 3.) THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LIES IN FLOOD HAZtiRD ZONE C -AREA OF MINIMAL 4•) THE UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN ARE DEDICATED FOR THE INSTALLATION, MAINTE REPLACEMENT OF ELECTRIC, GAS, TELEVISION CABLE, AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS r+ rr THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS DAY DAY U!~:_ITIES SHALL ALSO BE PERMITTED WITHIN ANY ACCESS EASEMENTS AND PRIV OF IN THE SUBDIVISION. PERMANENT STRUCTURES AIJD WATER METERS SHALL NOT OF 1997 BY AS OF WITHIN SAID UTILITY EASEMENTS. Kenneth A.Perry SAULSBURY PROPERTIES, LLLP, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CO TIP CORPORATION. ReQi~tered Colorado Land Surveyor MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 5•) PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OF ANY TREE SHOWN ON THE FACE OF THIS PLAT, AP MUST BE RECEIVED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. THESE MATURE TREES WILL BE ALLOWED ONLY WHEN IN DIRECT CONFLICT WITH FOOTPRINT PROPOSED WITH NEW HOME CONSTRUCTION. 6.) THE NORTH 165' OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ZONED R-3. THE REMAINDER PROPERTY IS ZONED R-2, NOTARY PUBLIC >lorad~. do ~~reby c~rti~v that fiha _ r, CASE HISTORY NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAV! YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY  ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE ! MY f M/ i4ii1~11V1i 1 VVVlrl.il111V} 1~II.tG.VV mrr -zN vr- A nC% V MS-98-3 AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED UPON N INO. DATE DESCRIPTION BY TEN (18) YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREO C,R.S.1 3-80-105(3)(o)* 1 _ DRAWN D.LL JOB NUMBER SIfET K CHECKW 106-071093-00 1 OF 2 Iv i i 1 1, BOOK PAGE RECEPTION N0. {F DATE A REPEAT OF THE NORTH 3/4 OF TFIE NORTH 3/5 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF A SUBDIVISION IN THE SOUTHEAST ONC-~tUARTER OF SECTION 26, T OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDI CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, ST f . f FINAL PLAT ~ , d 1 Ii id,'I ~ ,i~,ii 6 !!lil ! 1' 1 32ND A\V/EI~IUE I yu v-lY 1~ .i - 1 ~9,9~~ E5.00' NORTH LII1E ff TFE SE V4 OF SELiIWI 86-3-69 ~ O / ~ W 1 - ' of i ,r a LS l:~ir=~ ~w 'E~ 9 ` ! k ----T~ E ~ f rt I~ . i I ~_t Y 1 ~f 1 k~ 43,560.99V 54. FT. f r E E I ~ N~ h J ~ ~~il U I _I l- r A ~~il 1 I Y P,'~ k-r ~Yl r 1~J-r i~ ~I '!III J ~M~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t I ~ i l . ~ t ~ - - - f W I } k ~ I s.oo. - - - - - - - - ~ 104.07 104.07 ~ 104.0 ° ~ ~ ~ 30' ACCESS/NONEXCLUSIVE UTILITY EASEMENT . ~ v_ ..a. ,a. ~ ~fx, ~ {r~ '•4 a t 4 99 e ~ ~ 24.00' anal ~.a.~~ i - u. q xMO d ~p ' 's a ~r !'~I ~ --1---------- ~ ~ a I~-i-- , iii ~ iii r ~ 1 f f~ t,.y SCE i iii iii l ~ ) J r ~ ~ I~ \ ~ I r ~,.m.~ ~ m~..~., „~,rc-~. amk,~.....,m. y> } MMM~~~ 1 ~ ~ j LOT 2 ~ ~~o LOT 3 ~a ~ LOT 4 { ~ ~ ~ 15003.36 SQ. FT. f ~ ~y 15001.87 SQ. FT. t ~ 15001.00 SQ. F 3 ~ I~ i i I i~ i~I ~ ~ o I 5~ UTILITY EASEMENT ~-I ~ I I I °r jj III ICI SETBACKS L-~------- -----J 0' 402 10 UTILITY EASEMENT~I - I~ _ 104.07' ~ ~ _I (TYP.) 104.07' 104.08 317.22 s, ~ . ~r i i! fJJ ~ I1~ J 1/11-IS i ~~~i~ ~ _ m. ~ A'z.-.ei ',m+n A kxm .i ~m~ na,. ~a,,r: r...p rr'cy, y~y =5ri Ar`. F fif ~ d f~ya Y: .__,,.r., 3 y- _ - - t~,~ w..~ Y er._ { L r n A C C L11CT(1DY %aMJC n,J ,vnI LI I I Lt I U IN U U 6V I LL L.~ MS-98-3 TEL*(303)794-4704 L 4 Nn r) _e TV _ i-)Fgr.pip77nN RY = FAX*(303)794-4703 P ' i I I PUBLIC HEARING SPEAKERS' LIST Case No. M S O 3 Date: 9~~ / Request: U (please print) Speaker Name Address/Phone In Favor Opposed ~5~~ Go~~~tlp I1 Am- ,er 60~~3 P166 IN 30 ZX, X bU u 3o6~Tc~I S h_ is 4f✓ ° j. v v v CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT r TO: Planning Commission DATE OF MEETING: June 18, 1998 DATE PREPARED: June 11, 1998 CASE NO. & NAME: MS-98-3/Saulsbury Properties CASE MANAGERWIfII. Reckert ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a four-lot minor subdivision LOCATION OF REQUEST: 3195 Saulsbury Street NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT(S): Alec Garbini CM2 Management 1547 Cole Blvd. Golden, CO NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER(S): APPROXIMATE AREA: PRESENT ZONING: PRESENT LAND USE: SURROUNDING ZONING: SURROUNDING LAND USE: DATE PUBLISHED: DATE POSTED: DATED LEGAL NOTICES SENT: ENTER INTO RECORD: Q COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (X) ZONING ORDINANCE (X) SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS Q OTHER 2.042 acres R-2 and R-3 Single Family, Multi-family, vacant N, S, E: R-2; W: R-2, R-1A N, S, E and W: Low Density Residential May 29, 1998 June 3, 1998 May 28, 1998 (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS Q SLIDES (X) EXHIBITS JURISDICTION: The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. C-I I. REQUEST The applicant requests approval of a four-lot minor subdivision on property located at 3195 Saulsbury. The property is split-zoned with R-3 on the north half and R-2 on the south half. The zone break line falls roughly 150' south of the north property line. . II. CASE HISTORY The property in question was subject to a zone change request from R-2 and R-3 to Planned Residential Development per Case No. WZ-97-1. This application was made on December 18, 1996, but was never forwarded to Planning Commission or City Council for public hearing. On February 22, 1997, Ordinance No. 1066 became effective which placed a moratorium on zone change applications for rezonings to R-2, R-3, R-3A, R-2A and PRD zones. City Council then passed a series of ordinances in the fall of 1997 which reduced the allowable densities in the R-2A, R-3, R-3A and PRD zone districts. The application for Case No. WZ-97-1 was subsequently withdrawn. In May of 1998, the owner applied for and was granted a building permit for the construction of 12 multi-family units for the northern portion of the property zoned R-3. A site plan with drainage flows will be available at the meeting. Staff would note that the multi-family units under construction are consistent with the density established pursuant to Ordinance No. 1090. However, because of the density limitations, the existing single family home on the northwest corner of the property must be removed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the new multi-family units. Please refer to Exhibit `A'. The owner has now applied for approval of a subdivision to plat the southern portion zoned R-2 into three duplex sites. III. AGENCY REFERRALS All outside service agencies can serve the property with improvements paid for at the developer's expense. Public Service Company has requested specific language which has been included as note #4. Consolidated Mutual Water Company will require the looping of a water mainline between Teller and Saulsbury Streets within the 30' wide access way.(private street). Wheat Ridge Fire Protection District will require a fire hydrant to be installed at the southeast corner of Lot 1 just north of the entrance drive to the project on Saulsbury. No perimeter fencing can occur along the eastern side of Lot 1. This should be added as a note to the plat face. Planning Commission MS-98-03/Saulsbury Properties Page 2 Wheat Ridge Public Works Department has commented relative to the technical elements of the plat. Public improvements will be required to be constructed along the Teller and Saulsbury Street frontages A drainage report for the subdivision is in the process of being reviewed. The Parks and Recreation Commission has requested a 5% land value contribution in lieu of land dedication. IV. SUBDIVISION DESIGN The proposed four-lot minor subdivision will allow the multi-family structure with associated parking which is currently under construction to be contained within Lot 1. Lots 2, 3, and 4 fall within the R-2 zoned portion and are being proposed as duplex sites. A common drive/private street will provide access to all four lots. This access way is reserved byway of a 30' easement located on the northern portion (24') of the R-2 lots and the southern 6' of Lot 3. The access way will be located as far south as possible so that none of the area used for drive access has been used to calculate density for the multi- family units. The drive will be 24' in width, however, 30' is required for easement for the water mainline. Although the access and utility easement extends between Teller and Saulsbury, the Teller Street entrance will be gated for emergency access only. As the access way is considered a fire lane, no parking will be allowed on it and it should be posted as such. City staff had reviewed numerous designs for the project and has concluded that access via a public street (50' of right-of-way width with a cul-de- sac bulb) does not make sense and therefore, supports the access way as proposed. The owners within the subdivision will be responsible for maintenance. A 5' right-of-way dedication will occur for Saulsbury Street. A signature block for the Rocky Mountain Water Company has been provided on the first sheet. The applicant will not be enclosing the ditch. The ditch company has concurred. All trees over F in diameter in size which are in good health have been shown on the document with a note (#5) prohibiting their removal. The applicant's representative worked with the City Forester to evaluate the health of the trees to be saved. Staff would note that the setbacks for the duplexes will be measured from the lot line, not the easement line. Staff would recommend that driveways accessing the easement must be 20' in depth to allow parking in front of garages. This should be included as a note on the front sheet. All requirements of the Subdivision Regulations have been met. V. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION Staff has concluded that zoning on the property is R-2 and R-3 and that a subdivision is required to allow construction on the southern (R-2) portion. Staff further concludes the private street/access way is the best option available for internal access and that the land being used is not being counted toward the Planning Commission MS-98-03/Saulsbury Properties Page 3 C3 density allowances. Since all requirements of the Subdivision Regulations have been met, a recommendation of approval is given with the following conditions: 1. Note #6 be corrected to accurately reflect existing zoning (150' versus 165'). 2. A note be added that no perimeter fencing is allowed along the eastern side of Lot 1. 3. The private street/access way be posted "no parking" for fire lane purposes and will be maintained by the owners within the subdivision. . 4. A note be added that driveways for Lots 2, 3, and 4 be at least 20' long from the edge of the private street. VI. RECOMMENDED MOTIONS Option A: "I move that Case No. MS-98-3, a request for approval of a four lot minor subdivision on property zoned R-2 and R-3 located at 3195 Saulsbury Street, be recommend to the City Council for APPROVAL for the following reasons: 1. Zoning on the property is R-2 and R-3. 2. A subdivision is required to allow development of the south half of the property. 3. All requirements of the Subdivision Regulations have been met. With the following conditions: 1. Note 46 be corrected to accurately reflect existing zoning (150' versus 165'). 2. A note be added that no perimeter fencing is allowed along the eastern side of Lot 1. 3. The private street/access way be posted "no parking" for fire lane purposes. 4. A note be added that the access way be posted as a fire lane and that property owners are responsible for maintenance. 5. A note be added that driveways for Lots 2, 3 and 4 be at least 20' long from the edge of the private street." Option B:"I move that Case No. MS-98-3, a request for approval of a four lot minor subdivision on property zoned R-2 and R-3 located at 3195 Saulsbury Street, be recommend to the City Council for DENIED for the following reasons: 2. 3." Planning Commission MS-98-03/Saulsbury Properties Page 4 C-`f p WZ-91.5 ~-3 C I P- I 0I 0I RBI ~x I iP~ I ~I. W _n... Av x ~ x 302 ~ > ,r R n W. } R R g R' R-2 I u z ~i 0 N xxa °'I - a a a a a I c 20 c P~ T S~i n LLf I P. a a l R IM R ~ R I g R R g R g R IS g & a $ Ott ~ N r ~ m r s 12481 . § I . WZ-91-5 R-3 W 35TH AVE 3F0~ 3W2 qq 3 L ka- 'lblD k t z : U oz LL~ ' W ' l : N I R-2 HAYWARD PARK CITY HALL R-2 Q 4 W •8 x;o g $ S c ^ d 3 3 R H E ~ S. N c n$ e m 2 S I - $ 3 n W 5]W VL I I 2 R R o ~ ~ R R R H S ' R Z e ~ .A ~ n n R0. ~ R ~ W R ~ WW30 THHAAVe~ ~ - ^ S ~ .I°n I 41 R R ~ M I 5 - R n ~ 16SD ¢I a m a a a 361D - 35DD ~ ,8 sC!//~/ l 1,4' City of Wheat Ridge Planning and Development Department n11H P Memorandum TO: Building Permit File FROM: Meredith Reckert SUBJECT: Building Permit # /v9/$ DATE: April 7, 1998 Please let this correspondence serve as a memorandum of conditions in regard to the issuance of a building permit for property located at 3195 Saulsbury Street. DENSITY The plans submitted have been approved for construction of 12 multi-family dwelling units on *44,380 square feet of land area zoned Residential-Three. This density is consistent with new density regulations for the R-3 zone district approved by City Council pursuant to Ordinance No. 1090. However, the existing single family residence on the property cannot remain indefinitely if the project is built-out to twlelve units. The construction plans have been approved with the condition that the single family residence can remain as a construction office while the property is being developed. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the apartment building, the house must be removed. If the house were to remain and utilized as a residence (on 8750 square feet of land area), only nine of the proposed multi-family units would be allowed to maintain consistency with the City's R-3 density regulations. 2. FENCING This permit is issued with the understanding by the contractor and property owner that in order to comply with fire access codes, no permanent fencing will be allowed to be built along the Saulsbury Street frontage. A temporary construction fence will be allowed during construction with approval of the Wheat Ridge Fire Protection District. X Wheat Ridge Department of Planning and Development X ~ I% Owners Representative WEST 32,N A~ N0- t - - E ROW 331$Bj 25.N' ' NORTH.-LINE OF THE SE t/4 OF SECTION 2 E9- - CENTER pF SECTIDN 26-3-69 1 of 1 FpUNp 03 HRASS -IN RANGE BO% LS ]322 ~ t-. . i{ ~ /l HVE T' O ' ~ RTHS F LOT1 I S 444 OCK S. HPRTH'S SUBDIVISION _ - _ _ _ _ _ } 1. I - T NORTN.LINE OF II ` ~ _ f CONCRETE-MCA] S 2 C1 i' . III i I I _ ~5~ I i c I I LI ~ I - r ~ ~ NEV 1' CH.A - LtIVA`FETICE I III hil \ ~ • 1 i i ~ s l I ~ ~ i ~ I I I I hill ~i.II I II ~ I ~ i . - I ~ III ~ N ` 3 Q l_ HANDICAP R AM • - 5' CONC TE SIDEVA W L ACCES s _ ~s -V4 1 ~ ~ J In ENCY ENT NLE VITN GPTE _ . I ~ P~ 0 ~ W ° ' 75 V 90' 450' 1 8II' D G➢' 4 9 9.U'.-. 1 - ! >n~__ .'STAND I °TANDARD I I I z 4 1 _ J 2 ' ~RRB C NEW r T _ _ - - a SEE (DETAIL I HEFTS o I I T I C ~ 'EST 31ST PL 40' R❑W W I o . I' NEV CIIRH,GUTTER 6 ATSTREET tr0 O Q SI➢EWALK SfE TELLER STREET I Ln _IMpROVEbENTS (y i Q] - Q f co d r I 11- I.L7 00 L I I I " II ~ ~ W 11 l._' I, S~ LL _L..-.-.- I YELL ' ' (i ' NEV CURH,GUTTER S PTITA7J ED 1 0 i SIDEWALK TO NPTCH C>CIST.I F Y EE ASPHALT AT PROPERT LIN - I I L _L 3 1 L- I 1 I ST FEN w N l ou LOCK 2 HARTWS SUBDIVIS`___-' _ \ _ Ni r i T~•~ . -1 III Nrc N E%ISTING~NCE III ' o \\J N ROCKO NSA IN DITCN - I- F RETE S V I 1_~ • . W r I aaz3 l~ I I N"-°' Y ~S i I ~ I I I - 30•-0' ~ III I 311 FFE 5467.50. I ~ I I I i J 0^ M - - 5 . , 5 y~A I L N CONLRET LURB RAMP V H C➢L➢RELy IC➢NCRL~ SS G TTE I _ - E U N I SIOEVALK SEE SIETASLB i ko may.: 15'ft ' II I - r 5 li 36 C' 6 8 @ 6 '=640'1 S @ C C' 1111 / N CDMPA- 1RIyATE ACCESS DRNE A; ~ ,p - NEV CONCp~Y ~ GROSSPAN 1~ i II _ _ _ _ T qIV CONLR6TEI CURB RAMP 15'!~ V1TH WGO1(E➢ CONCRETE SURBGUiTCR SIDEVALK EE i I I ~ ~ I I' Q O ~ l I I; 0 r ; r CI TD BE HCATC TO THE I F VHEAT~ T E AS 4 LC} W ry~~ T }IIC~II(4 TEE (]ETA S C1~ FI r R GH RIGHT OF WAY IIII d- IJ=W CURB,GWT.tER b ATTA s EVALK PFPEEEEEERRRRRR C[TY OF W ~ Ili ➢ TAILS SE6 `9,AULSBURV 1 1 I I ;I kt7 I 1 II W SEE DETAN SEE DETA TS SHEETS q. i t A LL 2' S ALK LHRSEI F IJJ l ' I I ~ I 1 ~ I 1 ~ 466 i I - 2.OOR I r { I ~ N 13 II i I I xlsn I GRAPHIC SCALE c ~ BBB> 1 3 mea = zo n PLANS I rr Ccm 1 2TER EXISTING WATER LINE v. rER- - EXISTING WATER CONDUIT EXISTING HYDRANT r4 EXISTING GATE VALVE iwnTl*' EXISTING SANITARY SEWER z1E EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING MANHOLE EXISTING INLET -----------G----- EXISTING GAS MAIN _ EXISTING ELECTRIC T EXISTING TELEPHONE EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER NEW CURB AND GUTTER _ _ _ NEW CURD AND GUTTER (SPILL) m NEW ASPHALT PAVEMENT ~ u. N Q N K DT W R}~6o Boa<~ 6o-Jw+ W aNO 1 1 rcwomm ¢I_unn ENGOX ZW WvU_ N '3 'N 1- C9 ti l'1 J Z m Q ra^ V, Z 0 r Z 0- 0 V w VI DATE: 6/16/1998 DESIGN: PvF 06-071093 C1.DWG SHEET N4: 1 llT (~f1'l T' ♦ TIT Y A TT~XT A LY-UNU UJL JArr Lll.ti t lU1N Planning and Development Department 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Phone (303) 235-2846 cot oR Poo (Please print or type all information) Applica Address C~Q 'juju CL Phone 3 3 ~~(uqe~ City O i JMA (7/61P<'~D Phone Owner 'A eY ye~,ddress City Location of request (address) ~Z #J 7t'l (,Q, Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed Blow which pertain to your request.) ❑ Change of zone or zone conditions ❑ Variance / Waiver ❑ Site development plan approval ❑ Nonconforming use change ❑ Special Use Permit ❑ Flood plain special exception ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Interpretation of Code ❑ Temporary Use, Buildings, Signs ❑ Lot line Adjustment 9Minor Subdivision (5 lots or less) ❑ Planned Building Group Subdivision (More than 5 lots) ❑ Street Vacation ❑ Preliminary VvSL Final ❑ Other: Detailed description of the request: Fill out the following information to the best of your knowledge. Current Zoning: Z Size of Lot (acres or squar footage) Current use. s Proposed use.. Assessors Parcel Number: I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and co sent of those persons listed above, mplished. Applicants other than owners without whose consent the requested ction cannot lawfully be ael~ must submit power-of-attor e fro the owner which a ved of this action on his behalf. Signature of Applican i D ubscribed and sworn to me thisNAf'A day ofAys-; 19 Notary Public My commission expires Date received --AA Receipt No.no. .pR.p Case No. - rJ_ -D Related Case No. Zoning bC ' 02 a 1~ Quarter Section Map e ~q`- The City of 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80215-6713 (303) 234-5900 WHEAT ~Wh e at City Admin. Fax # 234-5924 Police Dept. Fax # 235-2949 GRidge May 28, 1998 Dear Property Owner: This is to inform you that Case No. MS-98-03 which is a request for approval of a minor subdivision of an R-2/R-3 zoned property into 4 lots located at 3195 Saulsbury Street will be heard by the Wheat Ridge Planning Commission in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue. The meeting will be held on June 18, 1998, at 7:30 p.m. All owners and/or their legal counsel of the parcel under consideration must be present at this hearing before the Planning Commission. As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to notify any other persons whose presence is desired at this hearing. If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2846. Thank you. Planning Division. C ~Bubara\PCRPTSTLANGCONEPUBHRGVns9803certletter.wpd 0 RECYCLED PAPER w~ v d d 'V ~ C O U y y N c ~ a ~ a 'w < U d O N y C Z Z NI a y K c 7 v > V 'd u I U ~ K ' N d N L I~q N ` O a N O 0 w OI O C N N N N N 'p L p E u o p ry # N 0 c y N O N M O M O M O M O' M O M O r U rn m rn m m rn 9 E E E E E E N d D Q U _ •IO 0 ~i M M C G y O ryM O 0 L d N O p NM J O W 0. W m~ Nc0 N O a a. 6 N O 41N d c m ao n m QO 'E U : m0 m _t O m.,. > d0 p¢O MaO ~ f v0 O >i U ~ L N N j (O o~ 0 S r U c a U C> m e O N d ,La ` o C O S ~ o. M p) N a ~ p 'O LL O Wei t0 >.W a J Y'1 p lp Mj O1 ? y N Z p 9 N > 0' i p O ¢ M N yj M 3 > cc y N I O N N N Y (O Z rL y a N O Q N N :a N y n j J J I~ j N O o U N ~ Q N ~ O N fn O J O. 0 0x WE R U E ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ z m U W T Q O O O O O O N p o in c`2 ~n M M ~ LLJ O E m m m m m - rn m Z aaw LLJ N Oda a O W U 0 Q N O R. W eD n w 0 z y a~+ N 0 > U ~i ti d Pr O CN F z m U FO a 0 z s F in document recorded under Reception No. 93143555, recorded September 15. 1993, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, together with that portion of vacated West 44" Place as described in document recorded under Reception No. F0575700 on March 19, 1998, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado. 3. Case No. -MS-98-03: An application submitted by Saulsbury Properties for approval of a minor subdivision of 4 lots for residential apartments and duplexes. Said Property is zoned R-2 and R-3 and located at 3195 Saulsbury Street and legally described as follows: A replat of the North 3/4 of the North 3/5 of the West % of Lot 1, Block 2 Barth's Subdivision, a subdivision in the Southeast one-quarter of Section 26, Township 3 South, Range 69 West, of the 6"' Principal Meridian, City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado J ri c `i fi . t .lltl~ G Ct G11'~(~ Barbara Delgadillo, P ing Secretary ATTEST: Wanda Sang, City Cler To be Published: Wheat Ridge Transcript Date: May 29,1998 A: \5-29publ ications. %rpd ~ i 1Z OF v° Q 92 u e a ~S o en h n i>~Ce u Zm- o ; s O a r5 O m q U Mfl, Q6 QC f O MN~ M JOJ ~m1 U O N~o~s N s \N W ,R S 720y~ LFL< 6 z~ EL (L Q` r a ~ O u} o U ~r t E U _ o j u < e ~ E G n "a e 3 F F b s b 348 U v ~ dbk m ~E s~3. ~c c u t ~ { i j ~ rc e ~e6 =€g aEy 5~ g~~~I 5I 4a ° F 9 € z ~ " s y m S ~ gi G 3~gga Y oa I$ ° $s E5( R a6S ~f e g~ e gl rya ~i 9 s € s m ~s~s 144 gNVM `..1N00 ~oaa paa inn M Z Op0 'd = M M NF Q b t y3 ¢ Qj30 bns u NP Mo 5 °g~~ ~ spa€e 'Y+rb~ a o la$ ff~ ° Is ne s ~ s 8 Y a U i = a 3 ~ e a a3 I 8 E ca °a 3o jo o u5 ua uo ~o a~ *C Z O NWN N oo 0 & U N O LL O ~ N 11JJ s N U y Z zb~ F~ Q 6 e I ~o J i33als Aanas~nvs _ _ s e a I ~ I~IiB E~ i IRE `gi I I I I- I ` i t I II I i 6 N I II Iq ~ ~ ~ 'g 6 e I I -t _ - I I ~ tJ I ICI u[0~ o M °m 4 I i - i~ .7.~ r E. N ti I I I i ~ t I_ ~ o o o I qb~ I C~ i~ 04 a Ip H @I I a :-i I I ~ H-~ Zb d w° m ~ a ~ m~&~•~ I~ I ~ ~ H m ~ ~ m i t ~ ~ C p ~ • I I ~.1 F I ~e I I~ I r I I- I ~ i,~~ Igl e l I I NiR 8_ _ rooa ,os .ice ~ -----------)M1Q I(r__ I II!d3111 0 °III I ° III w, III I IIMpIII mil ~ MN N 3 o€ mo ~ aN b ~ T 3 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80215 June 11, 1998 Mr. Kenneth Perry, L.S. Henkels & McCoy, Inc 3979 East Arapahoe Road, Suite 200 Littleton, Colorado 80122 WHE4;" The City of 4XII Wheat GRidge OZ O R A0Re: Happy Landings Subdivision, 3195 Saulsbury Street - Second Submittal Review Comments of Subdivision Replat Dear Mr. Perry, The second review has been completed for the above referenced document submitted to this office on June 10, 1998 with the following corrections needed: 1. Please provide the name and telephone number of the surveyor who prepared the platting document. 2. Area dedicated for five feet of right-of-way by separate document should read, "area hereby dedicated." 3. You will need access easements shown on the plat. 4. Please show the basis of bearing and ties to the section corners. 5. Please show the interior angles or bearings from section line. 6. Please provide a legend. 7. Please provide ownership deeds. 8. Please provide a contact person and telephone number for this project. NOTE: Closure and areas on this plat can not be checked until the additional information/corrections requested above have been provided. PLEASE RETURN ALL RED-LINED PRINTS WITH THE SECOND SUBMITTAL. (303) 234-5900 • ADMINISTRATION FAX: 234.5924 POLICE DEPARTMENT. FAX: 235-2949 "Y uave any questions regarding the above listed items, please contact Mr. John McGuire, P. S. t235-2868. S ' c ely, Gr Knddson, M.P.A. Development Review Engineer cc: Dave Kotecki, Sr. Project Engineer John McGuire, City Surveyor Meredith Reckert, Sr. Planner File May-27-98 03:47P Henkels & McCoy, Inc May-27-98 13:44 CM2 -avbini CM2, Inc. MANAGEMENT 303 796 9580 P.02 suite 227, 1546 Cole Boulevard, Golden, CO 80401 Tel: 303-233-3447 / Fu: 303-239-ti616 MEMORANDUM Date: May 27,1998 Subject Happy Landings Subdivision To: Meredith Reckert / Wheat Ridge Planning Dept.- Paul Von Fay! Henkles & McCoy From: Alec Garbini , ,2.~4'~ Z3`3- After reviewing the staff comments I suggest the following change in lot sizes to accommodate the Wheat Ridge requirements. 1. Make three equal duplex lots in the R-2 Zone. Each 105.4' wide X 143.5' deep. The gross square footage of each lot will be 15,124.9 SF. 2. The private drive will be 24' wide and will be t:omuletely within the R-2 zone. The width of the lot (105.4') times the width of the drive (24') which is 2529.6 SF will be deducted from the gross area of the lot. 3. The net area in the duplex lots after deducting the paved area of the private street will be (15,124.9 SF less 2,529.6 SF) 12.595.3 SF 4. Set the south boundary of the easement for the water line on the south edge of the pavement. The 30 foot wide easement will be covered by the 24 foot wide street within the R-2 zone, and the side walk on the north side of the pavement which will be completely in the R-3 zone. 5. The lot within the R-3 zone will be 140.2' deep on the Teller St. side, and 140.14' on the Saulsbury St. side. My calculations indicate that the site will be 44,193 SF in size. This area is net of the public streets, and does not contain the private street within the property. May-27-98 03:47P 98 13 44 H CMZ e"19rb7fl1 Coy, Inc. 303 796 9580 tl 3V" ~LO`9-0010 Memo Happy Landings May 27, 1998 Page 2 of 2 Henkles and McCoy will make these changes to the site plan, confirm the area calculations, and superimpose the proposed site improvements on an illustrative site plan indicating the lots to be subdivided. t of 2 I WT 3 ;s '12+ I ~s,lzf X05.4 105 tAr i isl 12,4 io5 4 to M P.03 1.vc 7500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215 Wheat Telephone 303/ 237-6944 FAX 303/234-5924 May 22, 1998 Alec Garbini CM2, Inc. 1546 Cole Boulevard Suite 227 Golden, CO 80401 Dear Alec: Ridge This letter is in regard to your application for approval of a four lot subdivision on property located at 3195 Saulsbury Street. I have reviewed the submittal and have concluded that the following additions or corrections be made to the plat document: 1. Please amend the title to read "Happy Landings Subdivision" 2. Add a case history box with the following case numbers: MS-98-3 3. Add address and phone numbers of the owner, surveyor and lien holder 4. In order for Lot 2 to be a legal duplex lot, it needs to have 12,500 square feet in area with 100' of lot width. It is currently being shown as 93.98' wide which is substandard for a two-family residence. 5. Add adjacent zoning on the north and south 6. Add a signature block for the ditch company 7. Add a signature block for the Director of Planning and Development 8. Correct a typographical error in the dedicatorystatementt 9. Show existing trees over " in caliper which are to remain with the following statement: Prior to theremovall of any tree designated on the face of this plat, approval must be received from the Department of Planning and Development. Removal of these mature trees will be allowed only when in direct conflict with a building footprint proposed with new home construction." 10. Consolidated Mutual Water company may require direct lot frontage to a dedicated public street 11. Show the current zoning on the property graphically or through a note 12. The additional right-of-way required for Saulsbury Street should be shown as being "dedicated by this plat". 13. Please remove setback lines 14. Please add a note regarding floodplain designation (Zone C - Area of Minimal Flooding) Staff is concerned about the design as submitted which has the access easement for both the multi-family units and the duplex units running across the northern 25' of the R-2 lots. In the past where access is provided by private streets, the area being used as drive aisle has been called out as a separate tract and therefore is not used in the lot size and area calculation. proposed R-2 lots. Adopted by Planning Commission as part of the Comprehensive Plan amendments as related to requests for zone changes are the following definitions: "Net density: Net density is the number of dwelling units allowed on an area of land excluding all street and roads, whether public or private, to their full platted, dedicated or reserved width for circulation for the traveling public within or through the development. The calculation for net density shall not exclude those areas used as driveways and access to parking areas." Based on this definition, Staff is uncertain how the submittal will be received by the Planning Commission and City Council or whether Staff will support it. If you insist on forwarding this plan to public hearing Staff will require that the driveway to each structure accessing off the interior drive be at least 20' in depth from the edge of pavement to allow parking in front of the homes on Lots 2, 3, and 4. Attached are referral responses received from other City departments and outside agencies. All of their concerns must be addressed This case is tentatively scheduled for the June 18, 1998, Planning Commission public hearing. I will need fifteen sets of the revised plans submitted to this office no later than June 9, 1998. If you have questions concerning any of the above, please contact me at 235-2848. Sincerely, Meredith Reckert Senior Planner cc: Paul Von Fay MS-98-3 case file EARECKERT\MS98-3. WPD ONSOLIDATED mutual water May 11, 1998 i~. A RECEIVED MAY 1 21yyo Ms. Meredith Reckert City of Wheat Ridge 'Department of Planning and Development 7,500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Re: City of Wheat Ridge Case Number WS-98-02 to Subdivide Parcel into 4 Lots for the Property known as 3195 Saulsbury Street (Happy Landings) Dear. Meredith: This will acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated May 4, 1998 regarding the above referenced property. Please be advised that the above referenced property is in an area served by The Consolidated Mutual Water Company by virtue of a Distributor's Contract with Denver Water. Domestic water service may continue to be provided to this property subject to compliance with the Company's rules, regulations and requirements for such service as well as the water tap allocation policies as established by Denver Water. The Company's rules, regulations and requirements further require that each separate structure be served by a separate tap and meter, and in order to receive' domestic water service, the property must also front a Company main. Our records indicate that the property addressed as 7190 West 32nd Avenue is currently 'receiving domestic water from Consolidated through a 5/8-inch meter (CMWCo Tap Number 319/Account Number A-1002949). Fire protection requirements should be obtained from Wheat Ridge Fire Department and those requirements' forwarded to this office by the Fire District at the 'earliest possible time. We can then determine if additional system -improvements would be required to meet the demands set forth by the Fire District. THE CONSOLIDATED MUTUAL WATER COMPANY 12700 West 27th Avenue • P.O. Box 150068. • Lakewood,' Colorado 80215 Telephone 238-0451 • Fax 237-5560 i i i Ms. Meredith Reckert City of Wheat Ridge Department of Planning and Development May 11, 1998 Page 2 i i i t f If you should have any questions or comments regarding this correspondence, please contact this office. Sincerely, Michaele"l++ E. Queen Water Distribution Manager /ds cc: Dave Roberts, Wheat Ridge Fire Department Walter Welton, PLS/PE, CMWCo President Robert J. Rivera, CMWCo Assistant Secretary/Treasurer and Project Engineer John Sallee, CMWCo Meter Foreman I i i i i PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO A NFW CENTURY ENERGIES COMPANY May 13, 1998 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7500 W 29TH AVE WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 ATTN.: Meredith Reckert Re: Happy Landings WS-98-02 Siting and Land Rights 550 15th Street, Suite 700 Denver, Colorado 80202-4256 Telephone 303.571.7799 Facsimile 303.571.7877 Public Service Company of Colorado (PSCo) has reviewed the development plans for Happy Landings WS-98-02. To ensure that adequate utility easements are available within this development, PSCo requests that the following dedication language, or plat note, be placed on the preliminary and final plats for the subdivision: Eight-foot (8) wide utility easements are hereby granted on private property adjacent to all public streets in the subdivision or platted area. These easements are dedicated for the installation, maintenance, and replacement of electric, gas, television cable, and telecommunications facilities. Utilities shall also be permitted within any access easements and private streets in the subdivision. Permanent structures and water meters shall not be permitted within said utility easements. PSCo also requests that these utility easements be depicted graphically on the preliminary and final plats. While these easements should accommodate the majority of utilities to be installed in the subdivision, some additional easements may be required as planning and building progresses. As a safety precaution, PSCo would like to remind the developer to call the Utility Notification Center, at 1-800-922-1987, to have all utilities located prior to construction. If PSCo has existing gas or electric distribution facilities in this area, the developer should contact PSCo's Engineering Department at (303) 425-3867, regarding the use or relocation of these facilities. If you have any questions about this referral response, please contact me at 571-7029. Thank You, Patty Gawcnik Right-of-Way Processor NMD: Multi-family 7500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Meat Telephone 303/ 237-6944 Ridge May 4, 1998 The Wheat Ridge Department of Community Development has received a request for a subdivision at the property described below. Your response to the following questions and any comments on this proposal would be appreciated by May 25, 1998. No response from you by this date will constitute no objections or concerns regarding this proposal. CASE NO: WS-98-02/11appy Landings LOCATION: 3195 Saulsbury Street. REQUESTED ACTION: Subdivide parcel into 4 lots. PURPOSE: Residential apartments and duplexes. APPROXIMATE AREA: 2.042 acres 1. Are public facilities or services provided by your agency adequate to serve this development? y<S 2. Are service lines available to the development? tt~•~.q~^~s~alltrX 3. Do you have adequate capacities to service the development? x(-65 4. Can and will your agency service this proposed development subject to your rules and regulations? y65 5. Are specific easements needed on this or any other document? go two a.oaI ~ -Ed U" , 6. Are there any concerns or problems your agency has identified which would or should affect approval of this request? P o'r a-t 44n4 t 1'-1- a . Please reply td: Meredith ReckertSenior Planner t l Completed by: Agency/Department, Date) (Name opmen Department of Planning & Deve , DISTRIBUTION: X Water District (Consolidated Mutual) Jeffco Health Department X Sanitation District (Wheat Ridge) X Jeffco Schools X Fire District (Wheat Ridge) Jeffco Commissioners Adjacent City X TCI of Colorado X Public Service Co. X WHEAT RIDGE Post Office X US West Communications X WHEAT RIDGE Police Department State Lane Use Commission X WHEAT RIDGE Public Works Dept. State Geological Survey X WHEAT RIDGE Park & Rec Commission Colorado Dept. Of Transportation WHEAT RIDGE Forestry Division Colorado Div. Of Wildlife X WHEAT RIDGE Building Division "The Carnation City" Cd .,h,.V GENm RNVS-9"2 wpd MEMORANDUM I Approved Date OEPARThEENTOFPnUC WORKS TO: Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner FROM: Greg Knudson, Development Review Engineer DATE: May 13, 1998 SUBJECT: 3195 Saulsbury Street, WS-98-02 - Subdivide Parcel Into 4 Lots The Public Works Department has reviewed the Planning Department referral dated May 4, 1998 for the above referenced site, and has the following comments: 1. The proposed Happy Landings Subdivision replat document has been forwarded to John McGuire for review. Subsequent comments will be forwarded in writing to Henkels & McCoy, Inc. for correction. cc: Alan White, Planning & Development Director Dave Kotecki, Sr. Project Engineer Steve Nguyen, Traffic Engineer John McGuire, City Surveyor File The City of 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80215-6713 (303) 234-5900 City Admin. Fax d 234-5924 May 13, 1998 Police Dept. Fax 4 235-2949 Henkels & McCoy, Inc 3979 East Arapahoe Road, Suite 200 Littleton, Colorado 80122 Wheat GRidge Re: Happy Landings Subdivision, 3195 Saulsbury Street - First Submittal Review Comments of Subdivision Replat To Whom It May Concern, The first review has been completed for the above referenced document submitted to this office on May 4, 1998 with the following corrections needed: 1. Please provide the name and number of the surveyor who prepared the platting document. 2. Dedication should be by plat. 3. You will need access easements shown on the plat. 4. Please show the basis of bearing and ties to the section comers. 5. Please provide a legend. 6. Please provide ownership deeds. 7. Please provide a signature block for irrigation company. 8. Please provide a contact person for this project. NOTE: Closure and areas on this plat can not be checked until additional the information/corrections requested above have been provided> PLEASE RETURN ALL RED-LINED PRINTS WITH THE SECOND SUBMITTAL. w RECYCLED PAPER If yo a e any questions regarding the above listed items, please contact Mr. John McGuire, P.L . at/235-2868,- GIrg Knddson, M.P.A. Development Review Engineer cc: Dave Kotecki, Sr. Project Engineer John McGuire, City Surveyor Meredith Reckert, Sr. Planner File Parks & Recreation Commission Minutes - May 20, 1998 The new agenda format includes a second page. This page is for the project update item of the agenda. There is a list of all current and ongoing projects the Parks & Recreation Department is involved with. There will be a "V by the projects that will be discussed at the meeting. There is also a new item on the agenda that will be for City Council Matters. square feet of property located at the corner of 32nd A` property is requesting the property be subdivided into 4 duplex. 5% of land would be too small for park land us MOTION by Odarka Figlus the Parks Commission by Mary Margaret Coates and motion carried 7-0. item. the Parks & Recreation Commission was given a works at the Historic Park 5 hours day 4 days a N including the Johnson Cabin relocated to the Hist and the Brick Museum. The Wheat Ridge First and is owned by the Historical Society, at City This may be referred to This is 88,940 owner of the of the land value.: Secom on was not present for this Prior to the meeting c. Charlotte Whetsel 3 buildings on the land Park, the Sod House, ed in the Historic Park a Tree Ordinance was discussed i Commission in the future. Two future agenda items for the Parks & Recreation the Park Land Dedication Process. The :s & Recreation Commission received a copy of the latest floor plan of the Recreation The design development documents have been received by the City. These are the s of the building. After they are reviewed, they will be given to the contractor for a cost of the building' The cost estimates are expected to be provided to the City on June 3rd. ne 10th a meeting with the Citizens Group will be scheduled. The structural' engineer has designed the foundation of the building based on the soils report. They are designing a system of piers, beams and a structural floor. Additional funding is going to be requested from City Council for additional funding for design and specifications for the lime treating of the soils beneath the parking lots. 7500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Wheat Telephone 303/ 237-6944 L JUN I Ridge May 4, 1998 The Wheat Ridge Department of Community Devey t pia s' hived a request for a subdivision at the property described below. Your response to the following questions and any comments on this proposal would be appreciated by May 25, 1998. No response from you by this date will constitute no objections or concerns regarding this proposal. CASE NO: WS-98-02/Happy Landings , I 7 4 LOCATION: 3195 Saulsbury Street. REQUESTED ACTION: Subdivide parcel into 4 lots. PURPOSE: Residential apartments and duplexes I z - -~_1 APPROXIMATE AREA: 2.042 acres _ I. Are public facilities or services provided by your agency adequate to serve this development? 2. Are service lines available to the development? 3. Do you have adequate capacities to service the development? 4. Can and will your agency service this proposed development subject to your rules and regulations? d4 -ice = 5. Are specific easements needed on this or any other document? 6. Are there any concerns or problems your agency has identified which would or should affect approval of this request? Please reply to: Meredith ReckertSenior Planner Completed by: Department of Planning & Development DISTRIBUTION: X Water District (Consolidated Mutual) X Sanitation District (Wheat Ridge) X X Fire District (Wheat Ridge) Adjacent City X X Public Service Co. X X US West Communications X State Lane Use Commission X State Geological Survey X Colorado Dept. Of Transportation Colorado Div. Of Wildlife X (Name, Agency/Department, Date) Jeffco Health Department Jeffco Schools Jeffco Commissioners TCI of Colorado WHEAT RIDGE Post Office WHEAT RIDGE Police Department WHEAT RIDGE Public Works Dept. WHEAT RIDGE Park & Rec Commission WHEAT RIDGE Forestry Division WHEAT RIDGE Building Division "The Carnation City" C Bub.,nNGENRERWS-98-02 wpd SUBDIVISION NAME: Happy Landings LOCATION: 3195 Saulsbury St DATE: June 19,1998 STATUS: PP Number and Type of Dwelling Units: 6 SFA Total 12 MFD Total Dwelling Elementary Junior Senior Total Units Yield Yield Yield Yield 6 SFA .34 12 MFD .17 TOTAL FROM THIS PROPOSAL: 4 Elementary 2 Middle School .14 .12 .60 .07 .06 .30 2 Senior High 8 Total It is estimated that costs to provide classroom facilities for the students anticipated from this proposed development will be $118,534. Currently students from this proposed development will attend: Stevens Elementary School - 4001 Reed St, Wheat Ridge 80033 Wheat Ridge Middle School - 7101 W 38th Av, Wheat Ridge 80033 Jefferson Senior High School - 2305 Pierce St, Edgewater 80214 The present capacities and enrollments for these schools are: NROLLMENT CAPACITY - r 98/99 99100 CPC NEW ADDN NEW PC PERM DESIGN CAP TEMP BLDG TOTAL CAP Stevens 546 526 540 0 540 567 1 594 Wheat Ride MS 524 522 575 560 0 560 560 0 560 Jefferson 681 695 674 762 0 762 896 1 918 CPC- Current Program Capacdy represents Me number of student spaces that are available N there are no temporary buildings at Me school. NEW PC- New Program Capacity: the CPC+Me New Addbons Capacity. This represents the number of student spaces that will be available at the school when additions or !d onal spaces are constructed from Me 1992 Bond Issue. PERM OSGN CAP-Permanent Design Capacity (Me way Me school was built) Total CAP -Total Capacity Is the Permanent Design Capacity plus the capacity of Me temporary, building(s). NOTE: These are estimates from School District computations and may be subject to change. Page 2 Comments Happy Landings, PP SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING COMMENTS: Stevens Elementary and Jefferson Senior are currently using one temporary classroom each The School District would request fees in-lieu-of land dedications for this plat based on the new Jefferson County Land Development Regulations. Any fees in-lieu-of amounts would be held in escrow accounts for future application by the School District in accordance with our procedures and the Jefferson County Land Development Regulations. Sincerely, k~vll &10 Kathy Tully Director Properly Management rip xc: Sherida Peterson Lisa Woodman Bette Bullock Debbie Taylor Central Transportation Jeff Hall Apr-28-98 14:53 CM2 Garbini +1 303-239-8616 P.02 CM2, Inc. MANAGEMENT 1546 Cole Boulevard, Suite 227, Golden, CO 80401 Tel: 303-233-3447 / Fax: 303-239-8616 April 28, 1998 Ms. Barbara Delgadillo City of Wheat Ridge Planning and Development Department 7500 West 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Re: Happy Landings Subdivision / West. 32nd Ave. and Saulsbury Dear Ms. Delgadillo, Please be informed that Saulsbury Properties LLLP, wishes to subdivide the subject property into four lots for the purpose of constructing three duplex units, and twelve apartment units. The 2.042 acre site is divided equally between an existing R-2 and R-3 zone. The 1.02 acre R-3 zone to the north will contain 12 units. The 1.02 acre R-2 zone to the south is being proposed to be divided into three lots, with a minimum of 12,500 SF each. As proposed, the three structures will contain six (6) total duplex units which will each contain 2 to 3 bedrooms each, with individual two car garages- Please call me if you have any questions regarding the plans for this property. Sincerely, Alec Garbini Representative for Saulsbury Properties, LLLP Apr-28-98 14:53 CM2 Garbini FAX Date 4128198 Number of pages including cover sheet 3 To: BARBARA DELGADILLO CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE t1 303-239-8616 P.01 CM2, inc. ! Management Suite 227 1546 Cole Boulevard Golden, CO 80401 From: Alec Garbini Phone Phone 303-233-3447 Fax Phone 235-2857 Fax Phone 303-239-8616 CC: CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT INVOICE NAME DATE: ~A --`a,(( -q CASE NO. WS- 9 7-O0-t~, FEE TYPE FEE CHARGE ACCOUNT NUMBER Application Submittal See Fee Schedule 01-550-01-551 Publications/Notices See Fee Schedule 01-550-02-551 24" x 36" Blue Line $ 3.25 01-550-04-551 24" x 36" Mylar Copy $ 6.00 Single Zoning Map $ 2.00 Set of Zoning Maps $20.00 11" x 17" Color Map CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE $ 2.00 04,'27108 1:59 PH ctl6' Comp. Plan Maps $ 2.00 ea. P?aI VcrrTay Comp. Plan Book w/Map $25.00 RECEIPT MIW0005256 ANOU1vT Fruitdale Valley Master Plan FN?GD -OPIHG Appl ICATION F 100.00 $ 2.50 f118D ZOWIidG REIMBURSEMENT 115,00 Subdivision Regulations $ 4.50 r YrENT RECEIVED ANOUN Zoning Ordinance -,j37 2 K `15.00 $15.00 (does not TOTAL 15G include annual updates 2 _ Copies $.15/page Copy of Meeting Tapes $25.00/tape 01-550-04-551 Miscellaneous: 01-550-04-551 TOTAL COST: IS°O eAp ImningUomAinvoice -~--_~___e..- ~ ~.~.y--~--- I: - r .j ~ ` ~ T ~ - ~ ....nr......ww M: ,:,,.W r PLAT - SUBDIVISION 1 1 ► e ~ i t 69 W. of the 6th P.M. State of Colorado. ' ~Yt cast 1/4 corner of Sec. 26-3-69 , ~q found 0.3' brass cap ~n range 1;'~ u' box, LS 13222. ~ , 4 ~ f~l ~ A ,s a ,Po ~ ~ _ ~ i ty~ q}~ +~ryf ~y^~r rye [y~1 ~ °R. +M . t (~''yi a. ~..t 'fit ! I i ! F 4 ~ ~ ~ M.~ J 4/ / ~ r p w ~ ~ ~ !l.,f 4 r ~ _ ' r t w,.,rm ~ ,R,., e . ~ II fjy ~ P'.. 1 fit. _ i ` ~ r hw~:: c ~ f~ ~mo~ ~ c~.,k of f .a .,y n. p r I ~ a~ ~t , ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~IQ. l ~ I~ r '.y A ~ ~ , . ~ ~ . ~ _ ~ 1 ¢ ~ { ~f ~ ~ r 4 s ,`r I j l l r^, Q CCJ~'t:~~~ I ~ , ^~rG~ h' 1 ' "Y"'~ A r , ,7 2 rn „c Q. ~ r ~a 1 ~ cz~ w...._ ry rs 'ti✓ A r V Y r k ~ ~f ~f~ ~~C t a e `l' T, 6~i3 ~rm.«r.s { 1 / '.3 ~r~,,. h , r ~ y ~ , :r ~ + ~i,! , 4 ~ r°. ~ r 1. y„ r ""ti,A ..w..m+_~...,.,.rsw~a.M+~n±.'ww+M'"a _ .wm.-.~.wr.wn•w..,.r~.J ~ ...~~re~" PLAT WITHIN TMREE YEARS AFTER YOU I _ A * SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY AN ANY DEFECT IN i HIS IMPROVEMENT SU i COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. f 1 4 I I Y f n F 't W'~., s ~ A tLG i ~ I N i~ ~j~/ `T` m ~ ~t ~ , . a ~ ' + ~ f ~ 5~' ~ W M . ~ ~ 1 y 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ , . F # i ' ..n~.. ~ f3. ti ~ i ~'-^,.,..,A.~ to ! ~ : . - F Y I i' ,~...v~ ~ 1,1 r ~ , Q r ~ CC1 ~T1 _ ~ f 1 r`y" ~ sty. jX~ e v ~ ~ ! } k rv~ ~`~1~ ~ j a, ~ r,~ i ~ ~ ; . ~ . r ~r~ t as +~1 b v ~.1 ~ ~ , i Kam, r., ' a::: i.r=~ i ~ , E f ~~d~t . 3 F~ ~ t r k ~ t ! r ~ ~ ,nw.e..~.-'""il- .~^rfw.~,,,.Me,ew,~..,~.,.. rw~,. ..::u .na:,p. '~,`,+.e~w,.. ~~'T" ~g• ~ E ; ~ ~ i 5 ~ \ P A - ~i ~ Y ~ ~ , r_: ' .~..,.'..-,Y.,.........,.v.~...u,.~..-,.~.,~~.,,~~., a 4 ~ V s ~ r _ . _ . J-, -ice= I~ k~ f 7~ _ Y ~ d °7 ~ ~ i I 1 r- i j _ ~ - b_. i 3 ~ - f ~ i~ r_ _ ~ _ . o:. V i { } j } ~ "f-- f 1 1^~ *r t 3 wy,v S 7 .c r" 1 I c~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ , , } 1 a.. r i y i. - F#Iin g Cert'firate: t\.rUR -INN Deposited this of SURVEYOR arc. Book of the County Surveyor's .land survey/rigaYt of way X575 we pt 3rd Avenue. 'Lakewood, Colorado 9021 surveys at Page, Reception No. Fw: 'W - 2 ~`1-1171 0 VAX 303--237-8104 I w~ NI NI NI NIN NI NI VISION I NI NI 31ST PLACE 40' ROW NI. NI ~ I NI NI I II I N! BDIVISION III W J I- CD IP i LOT 1, BLOCK 2 BARTWS SUBDIVISION ° LOT 1 I N 1 3. 43,560.86 SQ. FT. t I M j1- _A/pARTMENTS T I ~ O ~ +a r. rn 'S'~ ~ ^r/ I I I 1 U iii o 0 I - - - - - - - AREA HEREBY DEDICA 6.0 TED OR R5' 0' J ~ 10. - A ES NON CLyVE TILI E MT~~r = 24.00' I N I / / / -TTT ~N o I v~~ 901314 co I I I~ I I m 1 I- _ I I c~ I I M ; 71--JrAM1I Y I I DWELLINGS IDETEN10 1 I I. I I I I I POND o 1 I 00 1 LOT 2 LOT 3 1 LOT 4 roE SEMEN T I 13284.99 I SQ. FT. t 1 I 1 M 15833.28 SQ. FT. t I ~NI 158 8.24 SQ. FT. t ~1 I ~r I I, i~ I Mi I~ 1 "10 ~ I ICI I I~I ,r, I I 5' UTILITY EASEMENT I-i I I I I ~r ` I 1 (TYP.) I I i I I 1 1 1 I I I I I i' KS_ - I WSCFj 10'- TILL ENI92.22' p I _ 317.22' 11 .00'1 BARTITS SUBDIVISION /-01",I ED R--2 D75 ~ 2v ~I II 5 of N pq ~I N iN CHERRY; I 1 . Iq ® I fLIVSWN'f I l `Or tsnr+~ ~ ~ i 3 I Vc. +-~D ~soo s I I I I ter , 51t~C•~T i 1 }bM~ I I 1 loco I I ~Gcr (2 ~kpa~rtaE uN M l2 F µc' I l4 APAtL~+~' Pt'~iu~G ~4- ~~..ro p~c I 1 I pu I 2 u ~-rs I L i i 2 i 1 1 14 P~ awl~cC~ I I . I 24 u~ tJ p"-`-sue It) l 1 A 12 FL Ts 24 pRl Y P wPt-~ coq ~o 35 I 1 P~ Pc~X' 3 l ~ 35 3o - - - - J - 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I I I I .L - - - - - - - - - - - - - __1 I `_--~1 L`=J I ----1-- - - ----1* 11 NORTH ELEVATION scale I/8'=P-0' SOUTH ELEVATION scale 118' = C4" G ALEC A GARBIM ARCHITECT SUITE 227 / 1546 COLE BOULEVARD GOLDEN. CO 80207 HAPPY LANDINGS DUPLEX UNITS 32ND AVE. 8. SAULSBURY STREET WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO Ot l ER: SAULSBURY PROPERTIES. LLLP. NORTH ELEVATION . L___L----- L____________ J_____J___J__ _ _ _ _ _ _ x x x x x x x' k X ~•k ~ DC7L(.{ "T'oP of a4Nlc x~x X ~k T1 I , eA.-r tLLLi 4~ J ' I 6 I 0 1 I 1 I New s I I ' f5m~ LL;Y i 2 UrL ITS }bH~ I 2 u rrs 5f= Lor- T 7 r~ 3 W. 32Nt~ A\15 N