Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
WZ-02-13
LOCATIONS: - ARVXUA ~ FROM ST& 41+40 TO 61+90 FR SG. 77+10 TO a 00 R E FROM STA 13+30 TO 21+80 tp Y '4' i 4 i i~ 4 i a 1- - a 3 MINIMUM MINIMUM DTTOM CONVEYANCE RIDGE HOME TRIBUTARY TYPICAL GRASS-LINED CHANNEL CROSS SECTION . ORIGINAL SCALE: i'=20' HORIZ. 1'-10' VERT. - ROW ACOUISITION - 7REQ'0 M UUM ACCESS DEPTH OF STRFaM REACH ROAD EXCAVAMON TABLE MINIMUM W10IH ROW REQUatEO RARVADA CHANNEL ALLISON TO CARR Y 9' 74' 75' CARR TO CODY N 11' 74' 75' . CODY TO DOVER N 12' 80' 80' DOVER TO PON01 N 9' 62' Be, PONOI TO GARRISON Y 9' 74' 0'1R GARRISON TO INDEPENDENCE - Y 9' 74' 75 KIPLING TO MILLER Y 13' 98' 100' MILLER TO OAK Y 11' 86' 90' OAK TO PARFET Y 10' 80' 80' RRIDGE ROAD TRIBUTARY STA. 0+90 TO STA. 6+80 N 7' S0' 60 STA. 6+80 TO STA. 12+50 Y 10' 80' 80' SIX 13+30 TO STA 29+00 Y 10' 80' 80' 1' MINIMUM 2 )v/ #SEE PROFILE FOR TYPE OF LOW FLOW CONVEYANCE SYSTEM 4' ARVADA CHANNEL AND RIDGE ROAD TRIBUTARY TYPICAL GRASS-LINED CHANNEL CROSS SECTION STA. 0+90 TO 29+00 ORIGINAL SCALE: V-20' HORIZ. 1'-10' VERT. TYPICAL CHANNEL SECTIONS CONCRETE TRICKLE CHANNEL DETAIL ORIGINAL SCALE: 1'-2' MINIMUM A V l5' MINIMUM EXTEND WINGWALLS. AS REQUIRED TYPICAL PLAN LAYOUT ORIGINAL SCALE: 1"=20' (5' IMINIMUM)~ (9' (MINIMUM) 3 SIDED CONCRETE CHANNEL SECTION A-A ARVADA CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT AT TRANSMISSION TOWER DETAILS ORIGINAL SCALE: 1"=20'- HORIZ. 1'=10' VERT. NOTE: DESIGN OF ARVADA CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS AT THE PSCO TRANSMISSION TOWERS IS SCHEMATIC ONLY. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN, REFINEMENTS TO LAYOUT OF STRUCTURE, WINGWALLS AND RELATED GRADING, AND ADDITIONAL HYDRAULIC DESIGN IS REQUIRED DURING FINAL DESIGN. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS MULLER ENGINEERING CO.. INC. ena TYPICAL CHANNEL DRAWING CONSDLIING IDTGIIiF~RRS DRAIN URBAN DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT COLUMBINE BASIN DiDNGAlE 4, SOTLE foD SECTIONS AND 1A1 OOOD.COLLI~ a0=a CHFI CITY OF ARVADA CITY OF WHEAT RDGE «~A11 SYSTEMS PLANTING uALCr.Ff I Ak=^lLc n~T~n Q 8 !3931 9aa-4998 - - - RIDGE ROAD TRIBUTARY TYPICAL GRASS-LINED CHANNEL CROSS SECTION STA. 30+80 TO 43+00 ORIGINAL SCALE: 1--20' HORIZ. • 1''=10' VERT. GENERAL NOT 1.) THIS OUTF ALL. PUNNING DOCUMENT a CONCEPNPL ONLY. THE OUTFALL SYSTEM - - - - SHOWN PROVIDES A ARMOR ORANAGE NEIWORK WITHIN THE PROJECT BOUNDARY. ORS REQUIRED TRIBUTARf µNp ~ ME TO IRE PROPOSED OUIFALL SYSTEM ALL FEATURES SHOWN ' . (CNWNELS, BRIWES, STORM SEWERS, DETENTION PONDS, ETC.) IRE PROPOSED UNLESS NOTED AS IXLSTING.. - - 2.) UTILITIES SHOWN ARE BASED ON INFORMATION SUPPLED BY LOLL GOVERNMENTS AND 1lIIUIY COMPMIES. PLW VIEW LOCATIONS PRE IPPRO%11MTE 1HE ELEATIONS BY VEIL UTIL E SHOWN ED. VQtEFlGTN)TN OF~UfILTIY L M AND OEIPM 5~ . NECESSPRY PRIOR TO FRr4J: DESIGN OF THESE. MASTER PLPNNm FAGLIIIES. 3.) ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN IN PLAN AND PROFILE IRE BASED ON A DATUM ESTABLISHED FOR THIS PROJECT MAPIENG. 4.) INLET LOCATIONS PRE SHOWN AT SCHEMATIC LOCATIONS ONLY. FURTHER - IWEMGKnON IS REQUIRED... . .5.) ON-SITE DETENTION IS RECOMMENDED FOR DWELWMEMS TRIBUTARY TO THE ARVADA CELENNEL LOCAL JURISDOMNS ME RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF ON-SITE DETENTION FOR NEW DEVELOPMENTS. xL _ r,'.,,5{"*~ / fix' „ I , 6L4' ~ /'l ~ ~ I ~'~•cu`_ D~.. -,\y-1~ r^ 1/ / ~ 4 ~ ~r_ / /I I; \~~i /'°J~ 3 ~ ~ ~~11;~~ 1 pE., o 1 r Kos:' I lJ 3 ! `=,~`y .te."✓✓D~ i Y.''' . CT \ ` '=+~rv 'JI? y~-.a 411 ~'tr >zt '"Y-_.` J - 7~~---.;e.,,-\ ~,~;~r~~ J~,j /"f'/?. .d')'~~~ \ r'Fy _ / 0 ! a ,13 ~"_:,-~~a--?'?' '-`I fi,.'i Ttx~•=t-l~ I ^t s-` GJ1 I IIF~'°-- Jill Y. _ •'c-- t/ L.l'1F hi, Y\-a r JJJ.IIl `J - -r~ ~ (y' (ass yI o r ~i' ~ : J_" r_ , ~ "r., ->4~"°~~ t' J_r IsY 1 • ~-L- ' 11~ ~ v. ; f ~ a,- ~ ! ~ r 1' ' i ,~11 Inh F'' S ~ ~'•I ~Or 4 ~.i5 J Itl rI Y""T// ,L~v ~ j •Q ~~'I~ s--~ _ r{ / 1 /'~J r•~-'l I, 11 / .._J I`~ I e~,;; ° rl - - x~ - -t :+`7,' ,1 / R7 L-' )I•.:_.-- I^.-'e~,l~r~" ~ j ~ ~~~~./!~i Ti II,J J -4 L ,f~` / YI. 5 .f'D FcT"J, I:i'C \tf l ~C. L~ ,.1'$-,! .i= ' - i -i' , . - ° ~TM °,Y.,-! • % - 7 / 4-,~'x"~~' - v+'f f E, ra Qr -r d effer,$ n Cauntq" of. Arvada C - w ` Lr' ti / . In i{J „rJ-_,('-'c'~'' k J/ ' y z`Ll./: a; ,yKti I P. ~'i i~ i 'I-~` 1 ]µI\~/_++y / r/M i ,k'• n Lil (_f. ~J I O s;..J.__:T}, ; r=.~ Q,% _ ~ Y•' /n , 5• a r~~.?'_•,l j ~1 t Sr''. . ~ I -.I ~1 ' i ~ ~I {L.JI l' _ r 4/ is r d I y3ry ~ j ~~gaa~~~~HHaaa %~-~.,f y i- i fs~ - ~S%'r' kr - ~1~( X45•'i - / r 1 II i II; ° IR x r.yr"' ,r: I ni - j ".'--F Rh~--I~ 11- )rl -534 30+40 TO 43360 / J / I L r - eI 5•=~- ~.`RA55-LINED CHANNEL .1 i' /'•-,I t? It ~'r =l O I ItF I.\('T/ O.Sy5=485eis 16,' GAS TO BE . I { RELOCATE so, Row .I I / - - T i • . I I I~ 3 .{IEbUIRED, a / I il' ST _ x I ! Y iv V - / I•, r~ I so LIP 64?R ) w \ Y f - a_ I ,'@0.5% 0A=91F(s (Y Y T E27Ct r.~\ r ~ I r i 1 ~ I'' x.~ j ~ ~ r (.,Y/ ' e' ( oa_ ~~a ::'es'.• ' p ~~:r~ J / -^:r23-}' ~ ~ In • u CP 0. I 1 R L. Ii I `:r4 F 5T 1`T-O~~i! q .`_r ~ ✓ -n-r ~ %j'sv.c:. %-i` $Q 85~ y_~_ _~40_~30 P+' ~,ci,s` (ii\ to 'Ja\ ~I x UO LP72 A _ S \ 2` i 1 , 1 bL}43T _4 4gOVIDE TA 13+3 +90 C ' .Rf 9~RE5? TAT 7L_~`_.' ACCESS y ~ t RASS_LiNEDr nsARNEL~ ~_~•-,)I I ~i 'lll C'~ A' / ~ j. '.i T T I ~ i + I ~g~ R N I REQ. LRED/i =ee~= h`✓j. nOW D D I r o~'r (u+ ( ~I'~~ I )i '13w ' . I i. _ _ C, ED t ~ ~ ti - _ r Iih~"\,R .'FINE SEE3`HEET4 -T ®r 200 I 0 \ 1 soo MATCH Y , 1. ^ 1EAt"~\ oxAwlXo EE LIN.E..rl - ET. PLAN s ORC AERIAL jgpT RApHY pY ROOCKYAMOUNTU„ AERIAL SURVEYS ` MULLER ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. URBAN DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT COLUMBINE BASIN TOPOG0.APMIC MOPPING BV; LANDMARK M APPIN. CONSUOMNGENGINEFRS BA9 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE •XEET COMTOVR INTERVAl:1FODT $OUIFS WADSVOR'IFI HOVLEVARD ORAMN DATE FLOwN.: ILLY u.IfED Le CX)O.COLOnR o 10226 JHK CITY OF ARVADA OUTFACE SYSTEM PLANNING 98R 4 ALL ARE MEAN SEA LEIEL DATUM. LAM CONTRACT NO. 90.05.OB THIS MAP MAP COMPLIES WITH NATIONAL AL MAP ACCURACY STANDARDS CHECKED 3 18 - PROJECT N0. 9022 - 1` y~", r '1l'~ f'N-x~~ ..n i~~ b ❑ t-i "'~.'rrVV-„"T] I f~•n-i i elf'; I9 r~n i%\:: \N 60"Rcp~. ~l'.. ~ . ~I~•ro-<-^J ~~I 2 'L E~~~ ~ ~~Y.~n y OIp9=24 .SEEN RELOCAT AE RED~.:> \ I f.I II 4E! l .9ND iTd 41N1 n.:s L-1 :pp 32015 \h i' / / - a L r RELOCATE 'r5t0 ~1' 0+90 O 4+90 N`,~: \ It IRRIGATION 1 / I - W S A' 4 46 P Q100% ` 1 E L 5362. I j plrLy_ I L c' _ _ c -~SlA 0+0 f t• I / 0s=137EY5t a I . I \ \t e!: % v« j ' u l LFn(ES5-LI(JED CHANNELS' 1 I • I ~ s.4~,~, J w ✓ ,t ) D, rc 1 -ryada n'o 44ax os=6aoersf'~. C--~"1' Il" ::t~ l / • _ vi 1~ \ ` v ~ ~ - S4 `f I i wSd J % 1 TII" / <Z3 ~ss t ~ ~ fI? ! ° STA J99Nj40~T~r82+40 ~9) '_`I. \i\\~\~ -I ,y p^a STA s_ GBASS{OjE ~ NN~L 7 Y~ r s9.:- I J'{ r LASS..-LLL'INED-0OCA~NNLT •.J II n 100'PSCO , 0 0.9s%~ 6l ~pa~,, -o.. . x. UI; I 1 bo:3.x~}" r~1 Q ly"*~ -ROW IRED p.~~ ) ~ T Z I ' 100 LF OOSSLE &~L\\\`~;;~AIEV\VL`\\"~~N .c.n L I. I\~~~,~ 0.35%Oy~804d4 ~7r - %o .11 \\\\\N 0 7 dl } T 1 I ~1 I I \`~\\\\222`22`22SS 1 I1f ~ V ^695 1 v 1 1 ~ 9 _A\ cz~ O i w> I' ~ a}~ ~I ILF+J{~ ' J aTO ~rvs. Iy`J< S J ~j Q 2?"~y i/ ~ / ,1 , . OR POND EL-5342.T ~ - - V + - r a 'TY . C i'. J C T = 3F Ir _ um, V N~SL g--ads \f T- r,l T \ ' .~.t r In- c.-Q I a, T.'J~1 (f•' I J V " n-6 s-Duf= 5=4.7 FF lL~ f . CIS-? } f '6,S 1 1 1 ly `O-YR ND`EG 44.0 l/ L~r-L-10 rid \ 9_ \ IAr IIn=14 e( aD-oul=Bda'cCS Lf'L}, :aJC s h- r' •3u s'>o-~ I 5 <a'- , ~I ~j"~~-A • ~\-1 ~^•...5 -IJ~•': fir{ I~1 s33 o l.- r I ~ :1 _ NrP Cry ~ I 4 ~ I ~ l)I p~• f ~ ~ yCa'• t rE ` 53„ _ a , ? n~ \ I oP,~ CFNERA~ I /I' ';4 1.) THIS OUTFACE WNG DOLUMEM 6 ONEPNPL ONLY. THE OIITFPII S STEM SHOWN PROV1CPIPNP A MAJOR DRAINAGE NL%CC1 MRHIN THE PROJECT BOUNDARY. LOCAL INTERCEPTORS WILL BE REQUIRED TO SERVE TRIBUTARY AREAS UPSTREAM OF AND ADJACENT TO THE PROPOSED OUTFALL SYSTEM. All FEATURES SHOWN I 1 L4:' Ii [II-1 -I..t( (CHMNELS, FRIDGES, STORM SEWERS, DETENTION PONDS, ETC.) ME PROPOSED II~1 Y ` UNLESS NOTED AS EXISTING. - R !I1 F~ 2.) UTIUpES SHOWN ARE BASED ON INFORMATION SUPPLIED SY LOCAL GOVERNMENTS MO V eI' T- URUTY COMPANIES, PUN VIEW LOCATIONS ARE MPROXIMATE THE EIEVATI0N5 - t ' OF ALL UTILITIES SHOWN ARE BASED ON TYPICAL CDVER DEPTHS, OR AS INDICATED By VERTICAL DATA PRDED. NECESSARY PRIOR TO FINAL DEIGN OFT THESE MASTER PLANNED FACILITIES. IS 3.) ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN IN PLAN MD PROFILE PRE BASED ON.A DATUM ESTASUSHED _ . FOR THIS PROJECT MAPPING. - - 4.) INLET LOCATIONS ARE SHOWN AT SCHEMATIC LOCATIONS ONLY. FURTHER . IM'ESHCATION S REQUIRED. - - S,) ON-SDE DETENTION IS RECOMMENDED FOR DE\ELOPMEMS TRIBUTARY TO THE ARVADA 200 D 300 400 CHANNEL LOLL JURGOICTIONS ME RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF ON-STIE DETENTION FOR NEW DEVELOPMENTS. x4EI' TxRA MICUN0 CONTROL SURVEY 91: LANDMARK MFPPWO DESIG11E0 CONTOUR I MAPPING L: AERIAL EVRV EYS HULLER ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. Ely AE O PHOT MAPPING SY'; ROCKY OUMTAAPIp TO. LANDMARK coNSULnNC ENCTNEERS RAs AN DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT COLUMBINE BASIN PNG 2 FOOT DATE FLOWN: NLY L,t99p TD SOVIH WADSWORIHBOULEVARD DRAwx CITY L OF ARVADA CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE OUTFACE SYSTEM PLANNING ALL ELEVATIONS ARE MEAN SEP LEVEL DATUM, AI~IYDOD, COLO N ORB.I91D dTHK THIS MAP COMPLIES WITH NATIONAL MAP ACCURACY STANDARDS, LXECKEO CONTRACT NO. 90-05.08 - wuO /SYSr.F5~~0 E. BY-{LR1rk A INN 1}I [ y ; El' 1 F. O ~Ir fl L yes Q PLAN f 1 II I 1 ~h r l I T7 L yy °DW n~~(k( VI All, S r~ CD 0 CD o fD c CD c x '0 0 a w m CD a 0 ac0 ~a o a 0 o cl O CU N -3 < o w o_ rn ao ~CD a CD 5 CD N P w o. ao0 Y, ~ o o r. n rn'~ fn a a Y .o 00 a NF~ rn ~ ~n w c o N N 0 R C. C co CD m ~-n ' N 0' Ks tro N 0 0 C 00 0 ~n C w, w o' 0 0 ~n G b N I~ ~C 0 ~-n N w ^^Nnn UI ~ J Ot 0 CD C N rnc 0 CD a w s b N I m O ~n a h 0 C R a' CD N n 0 CD 0. N a C n 0 ro 'o 0 10 O rn a J k 0 a II u N I N a E rn a b A i O_ C w Op 8 vz N 0 n rn age rn C N rn ~ N CD N as m ~ Ut S m R CD 0. C C o' R O ~n a n rn C C rn n b b N ~ r r eY R ~ C w W O C~ C f 4s y g •I• A W a O N II CD i CD -P c ca 1 < w C _ rn n ~ CD CD 0N C~D 0 ro m m R a d c 0 R R y R' m LICENSE TO USE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY Rool THIS LICENSE TO USE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY is made this - day of ,4 Af-y , 2004, by and between the CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, a Colorado municipal corporation, whose address is 7500 West 29`h Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado, 80033 (hereinafter "Licensor") and Melody Homes, Inc., a Delaware corporation (hereinafter "Licensee") and Skyline Estates Filing No. 1 Master Association, Inc. (hereinafter "HOA"): WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, LICENSOR is the custodian and owner of certain public right-of-way described on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (the "License Area"); WHEREAS, LICENSEE is the o wner of certain real property described on Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (the "Benefited Property"); WHEREAS, LICENSEE has prepared and submitted a final plat to the City of Wheat Ridge that proposes a residential development on the Benefited Property (the "Skyline 3 Plat"). The Skyline 3 Plat indicates the placement of an underdrain system in the Benefited Property and adjoining streets to facilitate the flow of ground water drainage from the Benefited Property and the transportation of such flows into the existing public storm water system. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars paid to the Licensor by the Licensee, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Licensor does hereby grant Licensee the non-exclusive right to use a portion of the public right-of-way for use to construct, install, operate, maintain, repair and replace its underdrain system located within the License Area; TOGETHER WITH all the rights and privileges as are necessary or incidental to the reasonable and proper use of such License; and SUBJECT TO the following terms and conditions: 1. Licensor shall not assume any ownership or maintenance obligations and Licensee, and its successors and assigns, and HOA shall be responsible for the installation, repairs and maintenance of the underdrain system in the Benefited Property and License Area. 2. Licensee shall be responsible for the completion of the underdrain system located within the License Area. Upon the completion of the underdrain improvements in the License Area, Licensor shall convey the ownership of the underdrain system, located in the License Area, to the Skyline Estates Filing No. I Master Association, Inc., or such other homeowners association as may be formed in which the Benefited Property is annexed 1 (the "HOA"). The conveyance by Melody to the HOA will be evidenced by a Bill of Sale and an Assignment of this License. Thereafter, the HOA, as owner of the underdrain system, shall be responsible for the repair and maintenance of the underdrain system in the License Area. 3. Upon the effective date of conveyance of the underdrain system and assignment of this License Agreement to the HOA, and as a condition of acceptance of this License by the HOA, the HOA shall be required to budget adequate funds, and collect the same from its members, to own, maintain, operate and repair the underdrain system within the License Area. If requested in writing by the Licensor at any time, the HOA shall provide a copy of the budget and maintenance schedule associated with the underdrain system within thirty (30) days. 4. The HOA, as successor to Licensee, shall provide Licensor with written notice, at the address specified above, of any planned maintenance or repair to the underdrain system in the License Area and shall be responsible for obtaining any required permits before performing such maintenance or repair work. In the event of any emergency repair or maintenance, the HOA shall notify Licensor of such emergency actions within 48 hours after making any emergency service. 5. In the event that the HOA fails to operate, maintain and repair the underdrain system such that the underdrain system fails to safely and effectively operate and such failure adversely affects the License Area, Licensor may, at its sole discretion, upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the HOA advising the parties of such failure and adverse impact u pon L icense A rea a nd d emanding r epair o f t he s ame, o perate, m aintain and repair the underdrain system or any portion thereof in the License Area. If the HOA should default in its obligations to satisfy the Licensor's demand to operate, maintain and repair the underdrain system, the Licensor may perform such required repairs and assess each of the individual owners of the Benefited Property their pro rata share of the Licensor's reasonable costs of performing such operation, maintenance or repair to cure the Licensee's default, plus any and all costs of collection to enforce this obligation, after notice to the owners of the Benefited Property. Such costs may be recovered by Licensor, at its sole option, by certification to the County Treasurer for collection in the same manner as real property taxes, by lien and foreclosure, or by any other means permitted by law. 6. The HOA hereby agrees to defend, protect, indemnify and hold harmless the Licensor from any and all liabilities, claims, actions, suits, injunctions, costs, expenses, liens, and other legal and equitable proceedings (including reasonable attorneys' and other professional fees), arising from the operation and maintenance of the underdrain system in the License Area and the Licensee agrees to defend, protect, indemnify and hold harmless the Licensor from any and all liabilities, claims, actions, suits, injunctions, costs, expenses, liens, and other legal and equitable proceedings 2 (including reasonable attorneys' and other professional fees), arising from the installation of the underdrain system in the License Area. This License shall further be subject to and governed by the following: 1. Binning Effect. This License shall be binding on and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their successors and permitted assigns. 2. Annlicahle Laws. This License shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado. 3. Assignment. This License may not be assigned by either party without the prior written consent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Licensee shall have the right to assign this License, in whole or in part, to the HOA, without obtaining Licensor's consent. 4. Entire Agreem nr. This License contains the entire agreement and understanding of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and cannot be amended or modified except by a written agreement, executed by each of the parties hereto. 5. Counterparts. This License may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall, for all purposes, be deemed an original and all such counterparts, taken together, shall constitute one and the same instrument. 6. Recordation. This License shall be recorded. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Licensor, Licensee and the HOA have executed this instrument on the date first above written. LICENSOR: LICENSEE: MELODY HOMES, INC. a Delaware corpora on A division of D. I~. ortoi By:_ Name: Its: 3 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE A Colorado municipal corporation HOA: SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. I MASTER ASSOCIATION, INC. A Colorado non-profit corporation By: ~~Q O A cva~ Name: Its: ~r ` s T ~n 4 Acknowledgments STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY O~0agjr~))ss The foregoing trument was cknowledged befo e me this day of ,260 2y the of Melody Homes, Inc., a D ware corporation. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires on: (SEAL) N u is STATE OF COLORADO ) )ss COUNTY OF ~Lf4fi5rn ) 'f A,q AV B t\G •QO IOF COLO~ * Comm Epps 07=004 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this a3 M day of r•Cbrz+/ivr 200X, by Eras ~o the Mayer Oro T.v_sn of the City of Wheat Ridge. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires on: /l 2 200(p (S E A L) K Notary Pubhc +OTARY E'UBUC ..'00 ,,aacc ~P ~OF COL My COMMissiat Expires 111121706 STATE OF COLORADO ) )ss COUNTY OF J dv n ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before m this 11 day of e v 200` by 19 I~ z the 7re0JI-J of Skyline Estates Filing N~- o. 1 Master Association, Inc., a Colorado non-profit corporation. Witness my hand and official seal. My coy issio* ires on: ti Z ' d Notary Public i• PuO~' ~ ee5 q of G EXHIBIT A (LICENSE AREA.) LEGAL DESCRIPTION RIDGE ROAD RECEPTION NOS. F1738743 & F1738744 CITY OF WHEATRIDGE COUNTY OF JEFFERSON STATE OF COLORADO NELSON STREET WEST 53" AVENUE NEWCOMBE STREET SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 3 RECEPTION NO. F1912489 CITY OF WHEATRIDGE COUNTY OF JEFFERSON F-;~to:;n STATE OF COLORADO jo. 37889 PREPARED BY: ROBERT J. EDERVEEN PLS 37889 ON BEHALF OF: KIRKHAM MICHAEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS 5600 SOUTH QUEBEC STREET, SUITE 200D GREENWOOD VILLAGE, COLORADO 80111 (303) 694-2300 H:\020312\LDD-020312\Sur ey\LEGALS\License Agreement-2-lgl.doc EXHIBIT B (BENEFITED PROPERTY) LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTS 1-12, BLOCK 1 LOTS 1-13, BLOCK 2 LOTS 1-12, BLOCK 3 SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 3 RECEPTION NO. F1912489 CITY OF WHEATRIDGE COUNTY OF JEFFERSON STATE OF COLORADO 16109 PREPARED BY: DEAN F. GLORSO PLS 16109 ON BEHALF OF: KIRKHAM MICHAEL CONSULTING72MINEERS 5600 SOUTH QUEBEC STREET, SUITE 200D GREENWOOD VILLAGE, COLORADO 80111 (303) 694-2300 H:\020312\LDD-020312\Sur ey\LEGALS\License Agreement-3-lgl.doc CITY OFVADA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - ENGINEERING DIVISION FACSIMILE: 720-898-7603 A TDD: 720-898-7869 PHONE: 720-898-7640 June 9, 2004 Mr. Travis Crane - Planner City of Wheat Ridge 7500 West 29 h Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Dear Travis, Attached you will find a copy of my address map for "Skyline Estates Filing No. 2". The addresses shown on that sheet have been coordinated with the United States Postal Department and our emergency services department within the City of Arvada boundaries. Also provided is a set of the final plat recorded with Jefferson County for the same subdivision. Also, if there are any other items that I can assist you with in regards to the subdivisions within the City of Arvada, please let me know. It has been a pleasure coordinating these items with you over the last few months, do not hesitate to give me a call on my direct line of 720-898-7656 if there is anything else you are interested in. Sincerely, ;4~- William w "Bill" Puck - Engineering Administration City of Arvada P.O. BOX 8101 ♦ 8101 RALSTON ROAD A ARVADA, COLORADO A, 80001-8101 i t I - - ~ I~ ~ tn V 1 ~ ( r~ a o 0 3 iii Q A PART OF THE SOUTHE/~ST QUARYER OF THE SE~TI~N 1 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST O CITY OF ARVADA, C~7UNTY OF JEFFERSON, FINAL PLAT ~~„~~F~~`RIPTIt}N AND DE[3ICA~1~}N: KNUW A!L MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT 'fHE UNDERSIGNED. BEING THE w sern sr OWNERS OF A PQR1iUN OF THE SOU`rHEAST ONE-t~UARTER OF THE NC~THWEST pAlE-t~l}pRTER t'~ SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH. RANGE 69 (NEST OF THE 6th pi21NCfPAL MEI~IOIAN, cmr o~ ~avAOn, couNnr of ~~~soN, STATE OF COLORADO. MORE PARTICULARLY DESt~T18E0 AS FOLLOWS: COMMEN(;~NG AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST 4UARTER ~F' SAID SkYL1NE ESTAF>"e / SECTION 16. THENCE NORTH 0073'11" IMEST, ALONG ~fiE EAST UNE ~F `1'HE RUNG No. Y ' SOUTHEAST pUAR1ER 0~ THE NORTHY1fEST QUARTER OF SAID SECZiON 16. A DISTANCE {3F 7i.25 FEET TO A Pdi~VT ON THE N(~2THERLY RIGHT-OF--WAY UNE 1 OF RIDGE ROAD, SAGO P41NT Al.S~ BEING '1'NE POINT OF BEGtNNWG: SKYl1N~: E FILING too ~r9 1 ~ s ~ ar, rrrr arr.. rwr ~rrr.,rw. ~ rr rr a6 a a _.r THENCE 5al1TH 7 '38`30" WEST. ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHfi-OF--1lYAY UNE. t ~°qr A DISTANCE 0~ 277.09 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTW LINE OF SAID sau~~asT +~uaR~ aF -n~~ NoR-n~w~sY qun~r-rE~ of sEC~nc~ ~s: THENCE SOUTH 89 2'35" WEST, Ai.ONG SAID SOUTH UNE, A DISTANCE OF' r 591.80 FEET TO A POINT ON THE IN~S7 UNE OF THE EAST 26 ACRES OF SAID SOU'CNEAST QUARTER OF THE NORiNWEST QUAi21'ER OF' F SEC110N tfi; THEhICE NORTH 00'1311" WEST, ALONG SAID WEST ~3NE OF' THE EAST ACRES, A DISTANCE OF 1,318.61 FEET TQ A PGINT ON THE NURTN UNE OF SAlD SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUAF2TER 0►F s~c~noN ~s; THENCE NOR'TFi 89'37'11" EAST, ALONG SAIQ NOR~'i-! UhiE, A 0lSTANGE OF 858,27 ~T TO A Pt~NT ON SAlD EAST UN~ OF THE SOUTHEAST 4UARTER QF THE NOf2TNVYEST QUARTER OF SEC'f10N 16; . - - IN7ERSTA7E 70 THENCE SOU~'N 00'1311" EAST. ALONG SAlD EAST UNE, A 01STANCE C?F 1,246.20 FEET TO 1'HE POINT 4F BEGINNING; CONTAINING 25.78 ACRES MURE (~2 (.ESS- / A+" BEFORE THE COURTS OF RECORD OF THE STATE,UF C~L(N~A L® 1P 1i7 ~g"Z t- LA~t _a !■tLL 1.1 `.f ~ HgVE LAID pUt. PLAITED, AND Si1BDlVIDED THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LAND, UNpER 7HE NAME AND SM.E OF SKYLINE ESTATES FlUNG N0. 2. AND BY THESE V1CINlTY MAP i 11~ i PRESENTS DO OEDiCATE TO THE t~TY 0~ ARVADA IN FEE SIMPLE ZHE S'EREE~'S AND PUBLIC WAYS AS SHOWN ON THE PE..AT. AND GRANTS TO THE CITY OF SCALE: 1 120Q' J ARVAOA SUCN EASEMF]+ITS AS Ai~E CREATED HEREBY ANU ~EPiC't'ED OR. BY N4'fE. REFERENCED HEf2EON, A~GNG WITH THE t21GNT T4 Ih1STALL. MAINTAIN AND ~~vl~i ~~`~,i tco^,tinued) I OPERATE frAA1NS, TRAt~St~ISSICN~i LINES, SERVICE LINES AND APPURTENANCES, 1. 1. NOTICE ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW, YOU iiAUST COMMENCE /~lVY LEGAL ACT10N E111~ER OfRECTLY DR THROUGH 7HE VARIOUS PUBIC UTEL►TIES. A5 MAY 8~ BA5EU UPON ANY DEFECT tN THIS SURVEY 1MTHIN THREE {3} Yt !~";S ASR YOU j~• ~At:T ~ESiGNAT14t~ T"~3i.~: ~ . NECESSARY TO PROV4DE SUCH U11UTY, CA8l.E TELEVISI~1 AND SANITARY FlRS1' DISCOVEi2 SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACT10~i g~1SED UPON ANY TRACT D~SIGNA DEFECT tN THIS SURVEY 8E CUf~tMEP1t~U MORE THAN TEN (10) YEA~2S FROl~f THE SERVICES WIiNIlJ IT5 SUBDIVISION OR PROE'ERTY CONTIGUOUS THERETO, TNROUGN, OVER. UNDER AI D ACROSS STREETS. UTILITY AND Q'EHER EASEMENTS AND OTHER DATE OF 'ENE CERT1FtCAT14N SN41Mri HEREON. 7RAGT AREA USE PUBLIC PLACES AS SH041M ON THE PLAT. A 0.17 oc. OPEN S 2. LANb 'FI'RE GUARANTEE C(~iPANY COMMITMENT N0. ABBf:..4754-3, t7ATE0 g p.43 ac. OPEN S MAY 28, 2002 AT 5: ~}0 PM.. WAS EN'i1REl.Y REUEO UPON FOR RECORD DATA n F~ MELODY HOI £S INC: A 11FI A~V~RE ~~RPOR14T1QN 2. REGARDING RIGHTS-OF--WAY. EASEMENTS AND ENCUMBRANCES IN THE PREPARA710N C O.tO ac. OPEN S OF THIS PLAT. D O.Ofi ac. OPEN S 3. BASIS OF BE IN BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE WEST UNE Ol~ ~FiE SOi1THIMEST E Q.11 ~c. OPEN S Qt1ARTER OF ZHE NOR'fiHWE~ . QUARTER OF SEC110iV 76, TOWFJSHIP 3 SOUTH. JUCHEM D~lT RANGE 69 WEST tt~ THE 6~H PRINCt?AL MERIDIAN AS BEARING ~p~ NORTH 00"13't1" WEST. THE SOUTHEAST t~RNER O~ THE NOR7NST Y; 0~ SAED F 0.05 oc. ~CHEtrI Oi SECTION 16 1S MONUMENTED BY A S" BRASS CAP STAMPED "GT°Y Of WHEAT r . 3. BY: S WI~SCyhJ T)'ftg; VICE PRESIDENT tyF Ct1b~t~lUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAiE OF GOLOi7A00 _ RiDt~ LS 13212" AND THE hIOR'iHEAST CORNER OF THE SOU'~MEI~ST 1/4 OF 'tNE G 0.98 oc. aPEN S NC?R7H1N'~S'i Y4 OF' SAID SECTION 16 IS MOiVUMENTED BY A 2' ALUMINUM CAP H 0.97 ac. STAMPED: "PLS '{90Q3". DRAINAGE 0 4. THIS PROPERTY UES WITHIN ZUi~E X ACCORDING TO FEDERAL E~~:~2GENCY ~ 0.27 ac. OPEN S' MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOC~t3 INSURANCE RATE MAP. COMMUNITY PANEL ~ = SKYLINE ESTATES. OR t~~' NU. 08SQ72-Od05 B, RENlSED FEBRUARY 4, 1998. A5 D1REC1E0 BY THE DE 5. ALL RIGl~iT-OF-WAY RETt1F~N RADII ,ARE FIFTEEN (15`) FEET, UNLE5~ OTHERWISE ~pUN'1`Y 0~ JEFFERSON } 7HE FOLLOYV~IVG I~ISTRU~AFNT WAS A►GCNOWLEDC:EU BEFORE i~E 7H1S .,,,(DAY 4. OL AS WI~ESS Ir1Y HAtJD AND OrFF'IClA~ SEAL. 5. ~ ~ ~ NO~FO. F MY C{3N+it~lSSt DEDICATED AND SH~1~~d UPON THE YVIIHIN Pl.,AT AS PUBUC AND THAT THE TITLE T4 SUCH lANO IS THE DEpICATQR'S. FR 6. EIC~i7 FOOT WIDE GAS Mplh1 EASfMEN75 (8' G.~.) ARE NERDY G#tAtdTED FOR THE AU. HENS ANA ENCU~IBRAN(~S. Lf r, NOTARY 0 ice. ~ ~ 6. EXCUISIVE USE 0~' GAS MAINS ON BOTH SIDES OF ALL STREETS 1M'CFI~N SKYLINE ~ - I ~ Jr ~ r ESTA'iES~ FlUNG N4. 2 THESE EASEMENTS ARE LOi.AlED ON PRlt/ATE PROPERTY DATED THiS ~~bAY Off' ~vt.~.~ A.U., 20 ATTORNEY`S 5lGNAiUF~E ,p V~►G ~ Nd7A~'Y PU8L1C IMlutE~tATELY ADJA(~NT T4 ALL PI.NTiE~ ROADWAY'S. OTHER UTiLJ`T1ES SHALL HA1tE c ~'ME RIGHT TO CROSS AT APPROXIMATQY RIGHT ANGLES BUT IN NO EVENT SHALL t ~ ~ 4F- ANY WATER METERS, VALVES, STREET LIGHTS, POWER POLES, IrAAiI BOXES. OTHER _ ~i a E v STRUCTURES. TREES OR SHRUBS 8E ALLOWED IN 1NE ABOVE DESCRIBED AREAS. in 0 CONCR~7E DRIVES ANI3 S~DEWAi.KS ARE PF.RMISSIBI.E AS LONG AS ~-IEY CROSS AT SIGNAI]ON TABLE M SUBSTANTIALLY RIGHT ANGE.ES AND DO NOT EXCEED TWENTY-S!X {26) FEET IN USE OWNER AINTENANCE y X v VYIDTH. 3 ~ BY ARi1N HART 7. A .L. REAR LOT U11UTY EASEMENTS SHOWN ARE EIGHT-FOOT i Dl~ t~' U.E.} UNLESS w w o ~TI.E: MANAGER 7. ~ 7► , OTHERWISE NOTED. All REAR EASEMENTS ARE FOR UilUTY ANO DRAINAGE v U ~ PURPOSES. U'[[L1TY MEANS FAgU71ES FOR CONSTRUC7IUN. MAINTEP~fANCE ~ . a a STATE OF COLf~tADO ) AND OPERATION OF SEVI~ER. WATER. ELECTRIpTY AND IEIEPHONE. NO RETAINING F n o. ) SS WAl1S, FENCES, SHRUBS. TREES U12 OTHER OF3STRUC'I~ONS MAY PLACED W!'CHIN ~r a a COUWTY OF JEFFERSON a z g+ EASEMENTS THAT WELL 48STRUCT THE FLOW OF DRAINAGE tN SAID EASEMENTS. 8. A 30-FOOT 1MOE LAN~SCAP'E EASEMENT OVER Ah1D ACROSS A P~tT10N ~ v~ THE FOU.0IMNG INSTRUMENT WA5 ACKNOWLEDGED 9LF4RE l~E TMfS 1 ~ -DAY g. BLOCK 1. l4T 1, A5 SHOWN, StiAl1 8E GRANTED 8Y SEPARATE INSTRUMENT TO THE t ~ ~ a v pF ~ u. , A.D. 2003 8Y ~„R''f' c N ~ mo't' - SKYLINE ESTATES. aR OTHER, HOMEOWNERS ASSOCiA~ION AS DIRECT 8Y TF~tE YU u! LLi r o ~l A_ 1 rs > D BUEi..OER AND MASTER DECLARANT. Qom' } - - CO ~ in pFaurr N ~ M YIATNESuI~a~HANO AND OFFICIAL SEAL ~ 1 Iii R ~c X44 MAvtA-031 ES , a o o~ M IR APP revisions: 40 Q 3~ x ° ~ Gc'••.... ••'e~ NOTARY PUHUC plot changes ar►c cfty cammenta rye 3/7/Q3 MICHMELO 11031 Sher X LL plat changes and city comments rye 4,/18/43 plot changes and city carnments ckh 6/13/03 CONSULTING ENGINEERS Westminst, Ll- (D ssoo mum arc 910, sup zooo. cWWrooo WAL caaum eoiii CL W W;4 LU CC. , x LL n+oNt (303) M-aaan rax: (303) Qw-20 a z c) I !1 1 i 5 December 2003 Mr David Brossman CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE 7500 West 29" Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Re: Drainage easement at Ridge Road and Miller (Skyline) Dear Dave: Well, I think we finally have all the pieces to complete the drainage easement at the corner of Ridge Road and Miller (this is relating to Melody's Skyline project). I have included with this letter a recent title commitment that shows that the ownership of the parcel is now in the hands of the State Department of Human Services (so they can, in fact, be the Grantor of the easement) and the letter of indemnification from Melody Homes (this was reviewed and approved by Gerry Dahl a while ago). In addition, I have forwarded a letter to our Land Development Department to provide both you and the State with the as-built drawings. Please let me know if this is everything needed to complete the acceptance of the easement. Thank you for your cooperation and assistance in this matter - I know it has taken a while to round up the right information. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (303) 466-1836, ext. 1077. Sincerely, Alice Hanson Community Planning Melody Homes, Inc 11031 Sheridan Boulevard • Westminster, CO 80020 . 303-466-1831 . Fax 303-466-1838 From Land Title (M2) Thu 04 Dec 2003 10:29:05 AM MST Page 2 of 9 Land Title Guarantee Company Date: 12-04-2003 Land Title runxnnrrr crnurrrvr Our Order Number: ABJ70038589-2 Property Address: SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 4. RIDGE ROAD Buyer/Borrower: CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE. A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Seller/Owner: STATE OF COLORADO. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES >'S>'R>'F >'F>k>'£ J>X~f>£>'S>k>'f>k>k yf>X >k ~X ~F>'£>'S>'F>k>F>k>'F L 1>'F>£ f>k>f>k>k>k>'£>% f f>F>f f S>f>'F>f>k>%>k~X >k>k ~'£>k>'S>'F>'f>k>'F>k>k>k>k f Note: Once an original commitment has been issued, any subsequent modifications will be emphasized by underlining or comments. >f>k>Y>k t>k>k>k>kh>%m f>k>k>k>'FIIhh h>X~Y 1z t>'1>k>k>kh~k y£ f>k>'s+k>'F>k>k>k>'F>kk>Xss i>k S 1>k>k>k>k>k>k>k>k ~k+k 1~%~Y='F>Y>k Need a map or directions for Your upcoming closing? Check out Land Title's web site at www_ itar_rnm for directions to any of our 54 office locations. V - ° ESTIMATE OF TITLE FEES Alta Owner; Policy 10-17-92 TED TOTAL $0.00 c.'.IT teizooa, HUNK YOU FOR YOUR ORDER! From Land Title CM2) Thu 04 Dec 2003 10:29:05 AM MST Page 3 of 9 Chicago Title Insurance Company ALTA COMMITMENT Schedule A Property Address: SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 4 - RIDGE ROAD 1. Effective Date: September 26, 2003 at 5:00 P.M. 2. Policy to be Issued, and Proposed Insured: "ALTA" Owner's Policy 10-17-92 Proposed Insured: CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE. A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION $0.00 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is: EASEMENT TITLE 4. Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the effective date hereof vested in: STATE OF COLORADO. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES Our Order No. ABJ70038589-2 Cost. Ref.: 5. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: SEE ATTACIIED PAGE(S) FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION From Land Title CM2) . Thu 04 Dec 2003 10:29:05 AM MST Page 4 of 9 Our Order No. ABJ70038589-2 I rALDEXRPTIQV A 35-FOOT WIDE PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1492 AT PAGE 38, TOGETHER WITH A 35-FOOT WIDE PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1417 AT PAGE 505 OF THE JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE,SITUATED IN THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 16, THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 11 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 16, A DISTANCE OF 71.25 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 74 DEGREES 38 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 688.90 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1492 AT PAGE 38 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 59 SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID WEST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 36.26 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 74 DEGREES 38 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 688.91 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1417 AT PAGE 505; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 47 SECONDS EAST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 36.26 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 74 DEGREES 38 MINUTES 30 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 688.91 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. BASIS OF BEARINGS: FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS DESCRIPTION, THE BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6T11 PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AS BEARING NORTH 00 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 11 SECONDS WEST. THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 16 IS MONUMENTED BY A 3" BRASS CAP STAMPED: "CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LS 13212". THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 114 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 16 IS MONUMENTED BY A 2" ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED: " 19003". PREPARED BY: GEORGE G. SMITH, JR, P.L.S. P.L.S. #19003 FOR AND ON BEHALF OF: KIRIZHAM, MICHAEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS 5600 SOUTH QUEBEC STREET, SUITE 200D GREENWOOD VILLAGE, COLORADO 80111 (303) 694-2300 From Land Title (M2) Thu 04 Dec 2003 10:29:05 AM MST Page 5 of 9 ALTA COMMITMENT Schedule B - Section 1 (Requirements) Our Order No. ABJ70038589-2 The following are the requirements to be complied with: Item (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. Item (b) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must he executed and duly filed for record, to-wit: Item (c) Payment of all taxes, charges or assessments levied and assessed against the subject premises which are due and payable. Item (d) Additional requirements, if any disclosed below: 1. EVIDENCE SATISFACTORY TO THE COMPANY THAT THE PERSON OR PERSONS SIGNING ON BEHALF OF STATE OF COLORADO. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO DO SO. 2. DULY EXECUTED AND ACKNOWLEDGED EASEMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN STATE OF COLORADO. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES AND CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION. >p r[r/r{>r rs>rxaF'z NOTICE OF FEE CHANGE, EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 1, 2002 rsa rs rr>x>x~xn>s rF Pursuant to Colorado Revised Statute 30-10-421, 'The county clerk and recorder shall collect a surcharge of $1.00 for each document received for recording or filing in his or her office. The surcharge shall be in addition to any other fees permitted by statute." From Land Title (M2) Thu 04 Dec 2003 10:29:05 AM MST Page 6 of 9 ALTA COMMITMENT Schedule B - Section 2 (Exceptions) Our Order No. ABJ70038589-2 The policy or policies to he issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment 6. Taxes or special assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the public records. 7. Liens for unpaid water and sewer charges, if any. 8. In addition, the owner's policy will be subject to the mortgage, if any, noted in Section 1 of Schedule B hereof. 9. EXISTING LEASES AND TENANCIES, IF ANY. 10. ANY WATER RIGHTS OR CLAIMS OR TITLE TO WATER IN, ON OR UNDER THE LAND. It. SUBJECT TO THE RIGHT TO CONVEY WATER INA DITCH INDEED RECORDED NOVEMBER 3, 1950 IN BOOK 696 AT PAGE 118. (AFFECTS E1/2 E1/2 SWU4 NEl/4) 12. UTILITY EASEMENT AS GRAN'T'ED TO US WEST COMMUNICATIONS IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED APRIL 22, 1991, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 91033553. (AFFECTS E1/2 E1/2 SWIM NEI/4) 13. ANY TAX, LIEN, FEE, OR ASSESSMENT BY REASON OF INCLUSION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY IN THE NORTH JEFFCO METROPOLITAN RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT, AS EVIDENCED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 16, 1985, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 85088240. From Land Title (M2) Thu 04 Dec 2003 10:29:05 AM MST Page 7of9 ALTA COMMITMENT Schedule B - Section 2 (Exceptions) Our Order No. ABJ70038589-2 The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 14. EASEMENT GRANTED TO CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, FOR PERMANENT PUBLIC ROAD AND ADJACENT PEDESTRAIN ACCESS, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED JULY 27, 1999, UNDER RECEPTION NO. F0915805. 15. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENT TO CONVEY REAL PROPERTY RECORDED JULY 02, 2001 AT RECEPTION NO. F1267208. 16. NOTICE EXTENDING TIME TO FILE LIEN STATEMENT BY RECYCLED MATERIALS COMPANY, INC. RECORDED AUGUST 5, 2003 UNDER RECEPTION NO. F1828109. 17. TERMS, CONDITIONS. PROVISIONS. BURDENS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN QUIT CLAIM DEED BY AND BETWEEN THE STATE OF COLORADO. STATE BOARD OF LAND COMMISSIONERS AND THE STATE OF COLORADO, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES RECORDED NOVEMBER 13, 2003 UNDER RECEPTION NO. F1905531. From Land Title (M2) .Thu 04 Dec 2003 10:29:05 AM MST Page 8 of 9 LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-122, notice is hereby given that: A) The subject real property may be located in a special taxing district B) A Certificate of Taxes Due listing each taking jurisdiction may be obtained from the County Treasurer's authorized agent C) The information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. Note: Effective September 1, 1997, CRS 30-10-406 requires that all documents received for recording or filing in the clerk and recorder's office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin of at least one half of an inch. The clerk and recorder may refuse to record or file any document that does not conform, except that, the requirement for the top margin shall not apply to documents using forms on which space is provided for recording or filing information at the top margin of the document Note: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 3-5-1, Paragraph C of Article VII requires that' Every title entity shall be responsible for all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording whenever the title entity conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed". Provided that Land Title Guarantee Company conducts the closing of the insured transaction and is responsible for recording the legal documents from the transaction, exception number 5 will not appear on the Owner's Title Policy and the Lenders Policy when issued. Note: Affirmative mechanic's lien protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deletion of Exception no. 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment from the Owner's Policy to be issued) upon compliance with the following conditions: A) The land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single family residence which includes a condominium or townhouse unit B) No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or material-men for purposes of construction on the land described in Schedule A of Us Commitment within the past 6 months. C) The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against un-filed mechanic's and material-men's liens. D) The Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium. E) If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased within six months prior to the Date of the Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage for unrecorded liens will include: disclosure of certain construction information; financial information as to the seller, the builder and or the contractor; payment of the appropriate premium fully executed Indemnity Agreements satisfactory to the company, and, any additional requirements as may he necessary after an examination of the aforesaid information by the Company. No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured has contracted for or agreed to pay. Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-123, notice is hereby given: This notice applies to owner's policy cormnitments containing a mineral severance instrument exception, or exceptions, in Schedule B, Section 2. A) That there is recorded evidence [hat a mineral estate has been severed, leased, or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate and that there is a substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and B) That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner's permission. Nothing herein contained will be deemed to obligate die company to provide any of the coverages referred to herein unless the above conditions are fully satisfied. Fom DSSCLGS= 09/01/02 From Land Title (M2) Thu 04 Dec 2003 10:29:05 AM MST Page 9 of 9 JOINT NOTICE OF PRIVACY POLICY Fidelity National Financial Group of Companies/Chicago Title Insurance Company and Land Title Guarantee Company July 1, 2001 We recognize and :7c ct the privacy expectations of today's consumers and the requirements of applicable federal and state privacy laws. believ nal hhformation'anwhom iithat we serveThiPrivacy Statement provides that explanation. We reserve [he right to change tltis Privacy Statement fro m time [o time consistent with applicable privacy laws. In the course of our business, we may collect Personal Information about you from the following sources: • From applications or other forms we receive from you or your authorized representative; • From your transactions with, or from the services being performed by, us, our affiliates, or others; " From our internet web sites; n From the public records maintained by governmental entities that we either obtain directly from those entities, or from our affiliates or others; and 'x From consumer or other reporting agencies. Our Policies Regarding the Protection of the Confidentiality and Security of Your Personal Information We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards to protect your Personal Information from unauthorized access or intrusion We limit access to the Personal Information only to those employees who need such access in connection with providing products or services to you or for other legitimate business purposes. Our Policies and Practices Regarding the Sharing of Your Personal Information We may share your Personal Information with our affiliates, such as insurance companies, agents, and other real estate settlement service provider;. We also may disclose your Personal Information: " to agents, brokers or representatives to provide you with services you have requested; • to third-party contractors or service providers who provide services or perform marketing or other functions on our behalf; and " to others with whom we enter into joint marketing agreements for products or services that we believe you may find of interest In addition, we will disclose your Personal Information when you direct or give us permission, when we are required by law to do so, or when we suspect fraudulent or criminal activities. We also may disclose your Personal Information when otherwise permitted by applicable privacy laws such as, for example, when disclosure is needed to enforce our rights arising out of any agreement, transaction or relationship with you. One of the important responsibilities of sonic of our affiliated companies is to record documents in the public domain Such documents may contain your Personal Information Right to Access Your Personal Information and Ability to Correct Errors Or Request Changes Or Deletion Certain states afford you the right to access your Personal Information and, under certain circumstances, to find out to whom your Personal Information has been disclosed. Also, certain states afford you the right to request correction, amendment or deletion of your Personal Information We reserve the right; where permitted by law, to charge a reasonable fee to cover the costs incurred in responding to such requests. All requests submitted to the Fidelity National Financial Group of Companies/Chicago Title Insurance Company shall be in writing, and delivered to the following address: Privacy Compliance Officer Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 4050 Calle Real, Suite 220 Santa Barbara, CA 93110 Multiple Products or Services ff we provide you with more than one financial product or service, you may receive more than one privacy notice from its. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you. IF= PPaV.POL. CHZ I M . . • . • . . ^. 0 **' • .0 • I M-0 j[Jj1TMiff#M - - ------- M M -M-1 *0 Mks NMI#- On October 13 2003, the City of Wheat Ridge, after holding all required public hearings, approved the Final Plat for the Property titled "Skylines Estates Filing Three". A copy of the Final Plat is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein. The approvals cited above are contingent upon the express condition that all duties created by this Agreement be faithfully performed by the Developer, NOW, therefore, for and in consideration • the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the sufficiency of which are mutually acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 3. Title Policy. If applicable, title commitment for the Property shall be provided to the City. The title commitment shall show that all property to be dedicated to the City is or shall be, subsequent to the execution and recording of this Agreement, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances (other than real estate taxes which are not yet due and payable). The City, in its sole discretion, may accept any dedication regardless of encumbrances. The title policy evidenced by the title commitment shall be provided thirty (30) days after the recording of this Agreement. the Public Improvements, the City shall provide the Developer thirty (30) days written notice of its intent to take any action under this paragraph. The Develop may cure the breach described in the notice. )I The Developer shall warrant any and all Public Improvements for a period L my (a) That the title conveyed shall be marketable and its transfer rightf ul; (b) Any and all faces conveyed shall be free from any security interest or other lien or encumbrance; and (c) Any and all facties so conveyed shall be free of defects in materials or workmanship for a period of two (2) years as stated above. (d) To the degree the Developer is required to install and maintain landscaping on public or private property, it is the obligation of Developer to maintain the required landscaping for two (2) growing season(s). The City will finally accept for maintenance all Public Improvements after M 0 0 PH ME M ir-MIOWS ft 1 4 1- WININ "AfrJEAM m 9 VAI The Director and his authorized representatives shall have free access to the work at all times. The Director, or his designee, will make periodic 1 W1 M Off"Tur 119 Inspectors may be appointed to inspect materials used and work done, " t g"6" , M i"Wiaw A s6bject to the final decision of the Di'rector. Z 0 at the request • the Director. 17. Ca• i• ns. The captions to this Agreement are inserted only for the L_ purpose of convenient reference and in no �yay define, limit, or prescribe the scope or intent of this Agreement or any part thereof. 18. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, successors, and assigns as the case may be. 19 No Wai�Ler. No waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed or constitute a waiver of any other provisions herein, nor shall such waiver constitute a continuing waiver unless otherwise expressly provided, nor shall the waiver of any default hereunder be deemed a waiver of any subsequent default hereunder. Z # # -Z Z Notice to City: 6i Q without the fault or negligence of the Developer including, but not restricted to, zcts of God, weather, fires and strikes. 25. Assignment or Ag§IgnMeo. There shall be no transfer or 26. Reggrding gf AgLeeLne!31. This Agreement shall be recorded In the real estate records of Jefferson County and shall be a covenant running with the Property in order to put prospective purchasers or other interested parties on notice as to the terms and provisions hereof. WHEREFORE, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day ar year finst al�ove written. i / 0 STATE OF COLORADO SS. COUNTY OF j xe-r -- 0 1-) • The foregoing instrument was knowledged before me this -io--� day • N0yP-Mj)p.x 20k Z,by Abac . as ckc-- L(&pibca of j MM MM Exhibit A 0 t 0 IWV 101 IMm I I I REHM MEMOM ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COST OF CONSTRUCTION PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS iKM Job No. M-020312 MEN 0171.w DESCRIPTION (125%-COWR) $ 61267 * 00 $ 15:316,75 s 78,58176 Total Amount for the Letter of Credit H:X02031z%ca1 Vow %cW-4W1mate.x1s Page 2 j ilt 0 ' w 0 < < W(L 0 TO • Z a. LL. Q z U = j uj < w • oi 14 0 Gi < L ub Al V) • ='m- O(o vio'c At z • WOO oft# VIII ic II < w W • • • CL t <Z 0 grim y j ilt 0 Q < wo- • 10 Z 0- 0 w X- 0 z 00 z. • • V) UJ 0 I.- it t Ot UL 0 I 00 ti Im. xx WYAMY a �A ti Im. xx WYAMY a �A Gty of Whwt Ridge DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (303) 235-2868 DeNTtrnent of Public Wodm 7500 WEST 29T" AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 FAX (303) 235-2857 November 24, 2003 Mr. William C. Archdeacon, P.E. Kirkham-Michael Consulting Engineers 5600 South Quebec Street, Suite 200D Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111 Re: - Review Comments of the Ridge Road Construction Plans for the Skyline Estates Filing #3 development received on November 10, 2003. Dear Mr. Archdeacon, This letter is to inform you that all of the Civil Plans for the above referenced development have been reviewed and approved for construction. The Ridge Road Construction Plans were reviewed and approved on November 21, 2003. The Underdrain, Storm Sewer, and Grading & Erosion Control Plans were previously approved on September 22, 2003. The Street Construction Plans were previously approved on October 30, 2003. The Final Drainage Report/Plan was previously approved on September 10, 2003 and a signed copy of the approved Report was returned to you at that time. You will receive approved copies of all of the Civil plans with this letter. Please be aware of the following items regarding the construction of the project: Erosion control for the project shall be placed in conformance with the approved Drainage, and Grading & Erosion Control Plans, in accordance with the NPDES Permit requirements as set forth by the State, and maintained as needed during the course of construction. All drainage improvements shall be constructed in conformance with the approved Final Drainage Report and Plan. Upon completion of the drainage improvements the Engineer-of-Record, Mr. William C. Archdeacon, P.E., shall provide to the City of Wheat Ridge a Drainage Certification Letter stating that the grading and the drainage shall function as defined in the Final Drainage Report and Plan, have been accurately surveyed to confirm their construction is in accordance with these documents. The Drainage Certification Letter shall be written and stamped by the Engineer-of-Record who prepared the Final Drainage Report, and shall be submitted for review and approval by the City prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy. All public improvements must be completed in their entirety with the exception of the final (top) lift of asphalt pavement on the roadways. The final lift of asphalt shall NOT be placed on the roadways until after April 15'h of the year following the initial construction. The Developer shall maintain a Letter of Credit in force until such time the final (top) lift of asphalt has been placed, inspected, and approved by the City of Wheat Ridge. It will be the responsibility of the of the contractor for the project to repair any damage to the existing public improvements on Ridge Road as a result of related construction traffic in the area. Also, the contractor will be responsible for maintaining Ridge Road on a regular basis such that it is free of construction debris and tracking from construction traffic accessing the site. It will be the responsibility of the developer/owner, to provide the necessary testing, as applicable for the scope of this project, for sub-grade compaction and other related material tests for those improvements to be constructed within public Right-of-Way. (SEE ATTACHED MATERIAL SAMPLING & TESTING REQUIREMENTS) Prior to any construction of the public improvements, the necessary Right-of-Way Construction Permit(s) and respective licensing will need to be submitted for processing by the City. A detailed description of the work to be completed within the Right-of-Way and a Traffic Control Plan shall be submitted for review and approval prior to the issuance of the ROW Construction Permit(s). As-built drawings are to be submitted within 60 days of the completion of all infrastructure requirements. The City of Wheat Ridge shall reserve the right to withhold the issuance of any and all Building Permits and/or Certificates of Occupancy if the as-built drawings are not received within the allowed 60-day period. Subsequent to the completion of all public improvements and drainage facilities, and prior to the issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy, a complete set of as-built drawings shall be submitted to: Dave Brossman City of Wheat Ridge Public Works, Engineering Division 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Prior to the issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy by the City, an as-built drawing for the drainage facilities constructed across the State property lying to the east of Skyline Estates Filing #3 shall be submitted to: Mr. Robert Niedringhaus State of Colorado Division of Facilities Management 4130 South Julian Way Denver, CO 80236 If you have any questions, please contact me at 303-235-2864. Sincerely, David F. Brossman, P.L.S. Development Review Engineer CC: Alan White, Community and Development Director Steve Nguyen, Engineering Division Manager Bill Weyman, Field Services Supervisor Darin Morgan, Code Administrator Travis Crane, Planner File (3) Skyline F_sta Filing#3-appmvut CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE MATERIALS AND TESTING REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS DESCRIPTION Materials sampling and testing for public improvements shall be performed by an independent materials testing company at the expense of the developer, and/or utility district. Unless otherwise designated, all referenced specifications, standards or policies shall be the latest edition as revised or updated by approved supplements published and issued prior to the date of the building permit. REQUIREMENTS All materials sampling and testing shall be performed by certified, experienced and qualified materials testing technicians who work under the supervision of a registered professional engineer in the State of Colorado. All materials sampling and testing equipment shall be serviceable and have current calibrated certifications. Soil classifications and moisture-density curves shall be provided to the Department of Public Works inspector prior to in-place density testing. Materials testing technicians shall furnish copies of failed test results to the inspector as promptly as the results become available. On a weekly basis when testing is being performed, the developer shall furnish the inspector with copies of all test results taken during the prior week and a cover letter, signed by the supervising registered professional engineer, which summarizes the results and discusses any failed tests or inconsistencies. The City materials testing requirements are provided in Table 720-1. All testing procedures of verification and central lab requirements shall be as specified in the Frequency Guide Schedule of the Colorado Department of Transportation Field Materials Manual. One test is required for any fraction of the specified frequency. The reference to Section 203.07 in the table is from the Colorado Department of Transportation Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction. Skyline Emms FiBng#3 - approvaklo Table 720-1 City of Wheat Ridge Materials Testing Requirements Type of Test Frequency Remarks Soil Survey (Classification), 1 per 500 feet of roadway, Surveys for roadway and trench AASHTO M145 Sidewalk or pipe trench may be combined Moisture-Density Curve, 1 per on-site soil type AASHTO method determined AASHTO T99 1 per import material source By soil or materials type Embankment in-place density, 1 per 250 feet per lane per 6-inch Minimum density per soil Colorado Procedures loose lift classification, Section 203.07 Roadway subgrade in-place 1 per 250 feet per lane Minimum density per soil density, Colorado Procedures Classification, Section 203.07 Sidewalk subgrade in-place 1 per 250 feet of sidewalk Minimum density per soil density, Colorado Procedures Classification, Section 203.07 Pipe trench in-place density, 1 per 200 feet of trench per 18 Minimum density per soil Colorado Procedures inch vertical interval Classification, Section 203.07 Aggregate base course in-place 1 per 250 feet per lane Minimum 95% of maximum density, Colorado Procedures Density, T180 Lime treated subgrade in place 1 per 250 feet per lane No less than 95% of std. dry density, Colorado Procedures density and opt. moisture, T99 Cement treated base in place 1 per 250 feet per lane Density in accordance with density, Colorado Procedures contract documents, T134 Hot Bituminous Pavement 1 per 1000 tons Within specifications of asphalt content and gradation Approved mix design, binder PG 64-22 Hot Bituminous Pavement in 1 per 100 tons 92-96% of maximum density, place density, Colo. Procedures T209 Concrete compressive strength 1 set per 50 cubic yards PCC pavement, structural AASHTO Procedures Concrete, sidewalks and curbing Concrete air content and slump 1 per 25 cubic yards PCC pavement, structural AASHTO Procedures Concrete, sidewalks and curbing SkyGme Fsums riling#3 - approval.]V JP NOV-21-03 FRI 04:01 PM all Ni,•rewber 21, 2003 Mr. I:andnlf Tonug City Matlap,w' 7561) W. 29,t'Avcnuo Wh.ut Rirlgc, CO 80033 . )DY HOMES, INC. FAX NO. 3 166 2368 P. 02 Re: Skyline Piling 3 Lot Sales Restriction Dear Mr. Ynun,,,, 1iii:, lcuw memorializes the agreement butwoen the City of What Ridge and Melody Homes, Inc„ whereby dw City ap.nros to proceed with the recordation of the approved final plat for the Skyline Filing 3 subdivision, tagrther with related documents, and to allow Melody to proceed with land development and subdivisiou ingtrovomctirs within this subdivision. In return, Melody commits to reach aEmoement with die City on an ^und rrdt ain agreement 11tis underdrain agreement between the City and Melody sluiIl address, to the srrtisfnctiou bl'tlt.: City, issues associated with the operation and maintenance of underdrain facilities located partially wititin City owned and maintained public rights of way. The undrrdi ain ngreement shall provide that the Skyline Fzlatcs Filing No. I Matter Association shall incorporale the residential lots of Skyline Filing 3 and that the Association shall own, operate and maintain the undenhaiu lcilities boneftting the residents of the Skyline Filing 3 subdivision, in perpetuity. In the evetd ih=n the Association fails to meet this obligation, the City may, at its sole discretion, maintain and opcraic ow.io portions of the undcrdrain facility located in City owned rights of way. The City may lien and asncss tha residential property holders of the Skyline III stlhdivisimt for the City's costs of operation and maintenance. of the underdrain facility together with the cosh associated with these liens and assessments. Mrhrdy 1'111-lftcr agrees that it will not sell any residential lots located within Skyline Filing 3, nor will Melody be cnlitlcd to receive residential building permits froth the City for any lot within this subdivision unless and m+iIJ wt Undcrdrain Agreement is agreed to and executed by the City and Melody and this agreement is rc: oidcd. In iio ovoid Melody sells any lots prior to the recordation of an undcrdmin agreement acceptable to the City, the City may bi ieg an action is Jefferson county District Court to enjoin lot sales in the Skyline Filing 3 subdivisiol. Should the City enjoin the sale of lots by Melody for failure of Melody to meet the terms of this al;rcomem, Mclucly is obliged not to oppose this action. We :ipprec iat-, the City working with us on this issue. We particularly appreciate the opportunity to move ahead with suhclivision improvements. We do not anticipate this letter agreement ever limiting lots sales because we wally need to resolve this issue early in ilia land development process... before we begin imialIing any pipe and utilities. At this time we anticipate beginning pipe, undeTdrain being the first, by the wild of Deccmbcr, lu lie: rvcnt yon are in agreement with the foregoing, plcaei3 execute below and return a copy to me. Sincerely, Approved and Accepted llnvid L. UyJer I)iv ivinn T'rc• :id, nt RandolfY ng,City attager Date: Z~ZOo'3 ti031 Shondan Boulevard-Westminster, C080020=303-466-1831 a Fax 303-466-1838 NOV-19-03 WED 04;09 PM MELODY HOMES, INC. FAH NO. 303 466 2368 P. 02/02 S'1 ~'I.IN1 i J S"J:FI`1'1'.S' 1 It~ NI),2 S`lC~'~~tN.fa GS'f fi 11;.5' f if N0 3 .I is C4(~)1'1711'%!r'//?r11'ii•C:7(. 1;),Y,I(691f;'UI• bill P.ll .1 I'•II(i (.1'7J7j1(IJ"!{'ll'IY;I:411"11401.1111! 01473S.R(ylr'0l' 0111: 6171 RA f. r fl l'fll•.Ilil'An,1,(,014Vfy U1')RF1'1 R1'f1N. [;(IYr/~-WI IfEAIATI)CL, (,11[h~rl'r)I'~1:1$•IiRfON, 6i! .._,,YY'/11h 01- C(A_0I(AI7r)4000)- SIAIL 01 Cr 11 A)1L]bU RW H,. M.,.-- _r_ ....••..•I . • , t . +I 1 1 1 I I II L J I- --7j -T r.`-,( I 1 1 l i_ LQ1 1-0-, \ 13381S NOSl3N plC-' - 1 d'~ ~ I .~I Ii Q r 1 ~ a I~ \ I , n ,A I + l NCI u\ 133a1S 39W00M314 G~-n l.,a ~ ~ 7~~i f>, Y7rr3yir 1 7 o y 1 ~1 ~II n 1191l 1'- I 1 1 1 I f® I r ~1. Of a} fO `J' r ~ ,P 't ((JN rl DI Y [`1 (-4 ( V C-4 CV _ A f) ~ to to n U1 1f1 n U) [ r LLi 1 1 _ _ . , lanoo mvo n( 4l I V i[ F+ 0(( Lo In to Ln U) V r,- « in ~ Qtn wIn r) a,n M[ n.> Ig u [r ' x (Y.' nl rnn 00* V, m Mb n 'l,lb ~ Qd M07 N } M N N f!E v In n Lf) In) In 11) LO in PI) in [n n in r) in m 1 (n In ^ N I - I a >.ovxL - . . 1 r7 n n In r` to M L0 rn n . r • i ' i'' u, n Y I ~I - T 1 1 I® I 1, 1 L_ L__1 L__I L_J =ZZ L_J AIRS SNNO 13331S 13JIlVd y r ~ - ~ (nom M In M n C' V' in In rn v in r r'') r7 [nom r) M n N r7 Y M N in In U b y N N -J ti ~ h ~H b Q y 4 ti S `O V 18 November 2003 Mr. Randy Young, City Manager CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Re: Indemnification by Melody Homes, Inc. Dear Mr. Young: In connection with the to be executed Easement Agreement, by and between the State of Colorado, as Grantor, acting by and through the Department of Human Services, 1575 Sherman Street, Denver, CO 80203 ("State'), and the City of Wheat Ridge, a municipal corporation in the State of Colorado, as Grantee, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 ("City') pertaining to an Off-Site Drainage Easement located on a parcel of land, described on Exhibit A, attached hereto, Melody Homes, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Melody'), hereby provides the following indemnification to the City: Melody shall defend, protect, indemnify and hold harmless the City and the State with respect to (i) any and all liabilities, claims, actions, suits, injunctions, costs, expenses, liens, and other legal and equitable proceedings (including reasonable attorneys' and other professional fees), arising from the performance of its construction activities related to the installation of a drainage facility ("Activities") located on the property described on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (the "Property"), (ii) any mechanic's liens arising out of the Activities, and (iii) any damage to the Property and adjoining properties arising out of the Activities. Further, Melody shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect, at its own expense (i) a policy of insurance written by one or more responsible insurance carrier(s) licensed in the State of Colorado insuring against liability for injury to persons and/or property and death of any person or persons occurring in, on or about the Property arising from Melody's or its employees, agents or contractor's conduct of the Activities. The liability limit under such insurance shall be not less than $1,000,000 for the death or injury of any one person and not less than $3,000,000 for any one accident and $500,000 for property damage, and (ii) all employee's compensation insurance required under applicable worker's compensations acts. Thank you for your cooperation and assistance in this matter. If you have any questions, Please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, *eveW Vice President Community Planning Melody Homes, Inc 11031 Sheridan Boulevard • Westminster, CO 80020 • 303-466-1831 . Fax 303-466-1838 d ova WbBd i Dmastrreng of PubSc Works October 30, 2003 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (303) 235-2868 7500 WEST 29r" AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 FAX (303) 235-2857 Mr. William C. Archdeacon, P.E. Kirkham Michael Consulting Engineers 5600 South Quebec Street, Suite 200D Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111 Re: Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 - Fifth Review Comments of the Street Construction Plans, and Third Review Comments for the Ridge Road Construction Plans. Dear Mr. Archdeacon, I have completed the review of the above referenced documents for the Skyline Estates Subdivision received on October 16, 2003, and have the following comments: RIDGE ROAD CONSTRUCTION PLANS Sheet 2: 1. Need to double-check the baseline information as redlined (the coordinates shown are over 3 miles too far to the southwest). Sheet 3: 1. Please correct the labeling on the Fillet Detail as indicated on the redline plans. Sheet 4: 1. Correct spelling errors for the TYPE CG2 curb & gutter as indicated on the redline plan. 2. It appears that was a "shift" in the stationing shown in the profile. Please move 8+00 (grade break) and 8+27.73 (CL Int. Oak St.) to line up with the correct stationing as indicated on the redline plan. Sheet 7: 1. On the Vertical Curb Corner Ramp - Type CR2 Modified, please change the type of curb along Nelson Street from Vertical as shown to Mountable, and include the word Vertical for the 0.5' Curb along Ridge Road as indicated on the redline plans. Sheet 8: 1. On the Vertical Curb Corner Ramp - Type CR2 Modified details, include the word Vertical for the 0.5' Curb along Ridge Road as indicated on the redline plans. Sheet 15: 1. Please correct the various inconsistencies on this Sheet as indicated on the redline plans: a. Use Ridge Road baseline (Station/Offset) information for the intersection details. b. Double-check that all elevations match the plan and profile views on other Sheets within this plan set. STREET CONSTRUCTION PLANS 1. All comments have been addressed. The Street Construction Plans are hereby approved. GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 1. The Grading and Erosion Control Plans have previously been approved. STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION PLANS 1. The Storm Sewer Construction Plans have previously been approved. UNDERDRAIN PLAN (for Skyline Estates Filing #3 only) 1. The Underdrain Plans have previously been approved. The Public Works Department requires 2 signed and sealed copies of the complete Traffic Impact Study, Street Construction Plans, and Ridge Road Construction Plans. Please provide these with the next submittal. Subdivision Improvement Agreement Upon City Council approval of the Final Plat, a Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) will need be executed by the project owner/developer. The City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Department will provide the SIA to the project owner/developer. Please note that there may be additions to this document for this development. Application for Minor Dumping/Landfill Permit Prior to the commencement of any onsite grading, an Application for Dumping/Landfill Permit, along with the fees due will need to be submitted for review and approval. This Permit is generally issued at the time of the Building Permit. Public Improvements Cost Estimate & Guarantee Prior to any construction commencing for the required public improvements within the right-of-way, an itemized engineer's cost estimate will need to be submitted for review and approval. Upon acceptance of this estimate, a letter of credit reflecting total costs of the approved cost estimate plus 25% will need to be submitted by the owner/developer for review and approval. skyline_mview5 (Simi & RidgeRd Plans).hr Right-of-Way Construction Permit(s)/Licensing Prior to any construction of the public improvements, the necessary Right-of-Way construction permit(s) and respective licensing will need to be submitted for processing by the City. Right-of-Way Construction Permits are issued only after approval of all required technical documents, including but not limited to, the Final Drainage Report & Plan, Final Plat, Final Development Plan, Traffic Impact Study, Storm Sewer Plans, Street Construction Plans, Grading & Erosion Control Plan, and easement or ROW dedications. 2-Year Warranty Period for Public Improvements Upon completion of all public improvements and acceptance by the City Inspector, the original Letter of Credit shall be surrendered. At this time a 2-year warranty period for the public improvements shall commence. If at any time during said 2-year Warranty Period the City Inspector deems that the constructed public improvements are in such condition as to require repairs or replacement, the Developer shall complete such work upon request. Upon commencement of the 2-year Warranty Period, a 2"d Letter of Credit in the amount of 25% of the original itemized engineer's cost estimate shall be submitted to the City of Wheat Ridge and be dated as to expire on the 2-year anniversary of the Warranty Period commencement date. The City shall retain said Letter of Credit for the entire 2-year Warranty Period. Upon completion of the 2-year Warranty Period, the 2nd Letter of Credit shall be surrendered by the City of Wheat Ridge. F igned acceptance letter from the ditch company will be required prior to the issuance of any lding permits. Please return all redlined prints with the next submittal. If you have any questions, please contact me at 303-235-2864. Sincerely, David F. Brossman, P.L.S. Development Review Engineer Cc: Alan White, Director of Community Development Steven Nguyen, P.E., Engineering Manager Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner Travis Crane, Planner Darin Morgan, Code Administrator File(3) skylice_review5 (Street & RidgeRd P]a ).Itr Letter of Transmi Cam` ~~~9 To: T~vrs Fraa`. } 12E Ilk Date: ( . Date: Fax:: Attn: ~~a b r fn f{pp3~ Pages: ~w ar . :99. 1~ 2967 Re: '~~fjwAla 16-s Project: CC: This information is being sent to you for. r- Signature r Review/Approval (/Your Files r✓Per Your Request F- Other We are forwarding this information to you by: Iv Mail r- Messenger r,/Fax Other No. Copies: Description: Remarks. 11031 Sheridan Boulevard Westminster, CO 80020 • 303-466-1831 • Fax 303-466-1838 Streets 1 6" thick concrete (HC-Ramp) SY 46 $25.00 $1,155.50 2 8" thick concrete (crosspans) SY 182 $30.00 $5,455.50 3 6" thick concrete (sidewalk) SY 2,274 $25.00 $56,843.00 4 6" Bituminous pavement TON 2,486 $40.00 $99,440.00 5 4" Vertical Curb & Gutter w/ 2' Pan LF 4,394 $12.00 $52,723.56 Subtotal $215,617.56 Contingency ( 10%) $21,561.76 Total $237,179.32 See es+vna~-eS A4P-A 31 Out Z 003 H:\020312\calcs\cost-estimate -.Is Page 1 Ridge Road 1 6" thick concrete (HC-Ramp) SY 14 $25.00 $355.00 2 8" thick concrete (crosspans) SY 81 $30.00 $2,420.01 3 6" thick concrete (sidewalk) SY 373 $25.00 $9,322.50 4 6" Bituminous pavement TON 455 $40.00 $18,200.00 5 6" Vertical Curb & Gutter w/ 2' Pan LF 606 $12.00 $7,267.68 6 18" RCP LF 29 $28.00 $812.00 7 18" FES EA 1 $250.00 $250.00 8 Standard WR Inlet (Single) EA 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 Subtotal $40,627.19 Contingency (10%) $4,062.72 Total $44,689.91 H:\020312\calcs\cost-estimate.xls Page 2 (125%-COWR) $ 91,304.00 $ 22,826.00 $ 114,130.00 Streets 1 6" thick concrete HC-Ram SY 46 $25.00 $1,155.50 2 8" thick concrete cross ans SY 182 $30.00 $5,455.50 3 6" thick concrete sidewalk SY 2,274 $25.00 $56,843.00 4 6" Bituminous pavement TON 2,486 $40.00 $99,440.00 5 4" Vertical Curb & Gutter w/ 2' Pan LF 4,394 $12.00 $52,723.56 Subtotal $215,617.56 Contingency ( 10%) $21,561,77.6 Total $237,179.32 (125%-COWR) $ 215,617.56 $ 53,904.39 $ 269,521,95 H:\020312\calcs\cost-estimate.xls Page 1 (125%-COWR) $ 61,267.00 $ 15,316.75 $ 76,583.75 Ridge Road 1 9" As halt TON 1,566 $40.00 $62,640.00 2 6" Vertical Curb & Gutter LF 589 $12.00 $7,068.00 3 4"Sidewalk SY 326 $17.00 $5,542.00 4 6"Sidewalk SY 8 $25.00 $200.00 5 8" Sidewalk SY 27 $30.00 $810.00 6 10" Pan SY 70 $35.00 $2,450.00 7 rindin existing asphalt CY 98 $10.00 $980.00 8 si nin and striping LS 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 9 earthwork CY 848 $5.00 $4,240.00 10 sub Fade preparation SY 1,812 $5.00 $9,060.00 11 18" RCP LF 29 $35.00 $1,015.00 12 18" FES EA 1 $500.00 $500.00 13 Standard WR Inlet (Single) EA 1 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 Subtotal $99,505.00 Contingency (10%) $9,960-50 Total $109,455.50 Total Amount for the Letter of Credit: $ 584,616.95 (125%-COWR) $ 99,505.00 $ 24,876.25 $ 124,381.25 H:\020312\calos\cost-estimate.xls Page 2 Streets 1 6" thick concrete (HC-Ramp) SY 46 $25.00 $1,155.50 2 8" thick concrete (crosspans) SY 182 $30.00 $5,455.50 3 6" thick concrete (sidewalk) SY 2,274 $25.00 $56,843.00 4 6" Bituminous pavement TON 2,486 $40.00 $99,440.00 5 4" Vertical Curb & Gutter w/ 2' Pan LF 4,394 $12.00 $52,723.56 . Subtotal $215,617.56 Contingency ( 1100/6) $21,561.76 Total $237,179.32 H:\020312\calcs\cost-estimate.xls Page 1 Ridge Road 1 9" Asphalt TON 1,566 $40.00 $62,640.00 2 6" Vertical Curb & Gutter LF 589 $12.00 $7,068.00 3 4"Sidewalk SY 326 $17.00 $5,542.00 4 6"Sidewalk SY 8 $25.00 $200.00 5 8" Sidewalk SY 27 $30.00 $810.00 6 10" Pan SY 70 $35.00 $2,450.00 7 grinding existing asphalt CY 98 $10.00 $980.00 8 signing and striping LS 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 9 earthwork CY 848 $5.00 $4,240.00 10 sub grade preparation SY 1,812 $5.00 $9,060.00 11 18" RCP LF 29 $35.00 $1,015.00 12 18" FES EA 1 $500.00 $500.00 13 Standard WR Inlet (Single) EA 1 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 Subtotal $99,505.00 Contingency (10%) $9,950.50 Total $109,455.50 H:\020312\calcs\cost-estimate.xls Page 2 02, AX OMC8 OF COUNTY ASSESSOg 100 JEFFERSON COEMY PARKWAY GOL,DENL C0 80419-7500 FAR TRANSMISSION FORM DELIVER TO: Name: 9001 J. KEVIN MCCASKY As essor Location: FaxNO.: :3.0,3 -4-S:5 - ~Q `55r1 We value Jefferson County NUMBER OF PAGES: (including this transmittal form) Ifyou have not received the correct number of pages, or the quality of transmission is unacceptable, please call: ADDITIONAL. COMMENTS: DATE TRANSTNff=: C a 7 Phone_ (303) 271-8667 F= (303) _71.861o 02/,08/00 1TE 16:00 FA% OFFICE OF COUNTY ASSESSOR 100 JEFFERSON COUNTY PARKWAY GOLDEN, CO 80419.2500 October 27, 2003 City of Wheat Ridge Dave Brossman Public Works Dept 7500 w. 29a' Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80215 Re: Reception #'sF1738743 and F1738744 Dear Mr. Bmssman: 121002 J. KEVIN McCASKY Assessor This letter is to inform you that we have processed the deeds recorded in Reception numbers F1738743 and F1738744 on our records- These deeds both reflect property for Right of Way along Ridge Road in Section 16, Township 3 South, Range 69 West The property as described in these deeds are shown on our Assessor parcel maps and indicates the City of Wheat Ridge as the owner with the associated Reception number for each. Sincerely, Kathy Sewolt Administrative Coordinator 303-271-8645 Phone: (303) 271-8667 Fax: (303) 271-8616 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Telephone 303/235-2846 FAX 303/235-2857 October 20, 2003 Darrel Pennington Melody Homes 11031 Sheridan Blvd. Westminster, CO 80020 Dear Mr. Pennington: Ridge At its meeting of October 13, 2003, City Council approved Case No. WZ-02-13, a request for approval of a Planned Residential Development final development plan for property located at 10285 Ridge Road, for the following reasons: 1. The requirements of the City's Planned Development Regulations have been met. 2. Adequate infrastructure will be constructed with the development to serve the proposed use. 3. The Final Development Plan meets the development standards set forth in the approved Outline Development Plan for the site. With the following condition: 1. The installation of the required tree lawn and street trees shall be deferred until such time the Final Development Plan for Lot I of Block 4 is approved and construction commences. City Council also approved Case No. WS-02-01, a request for approval of a Final Plat for 38 lots on property located at 10285 Ridge Road, for the following reasons: 1. All requirements of the City's Subdivision Regulations have been met. 2. The lot sizes meet or exceed the minimum lot sizes established in the Planned Residential Development and Planned Industrial Development zoning. 3. All required utility easements are being provided. 4. Adequate infrastructure will be constructed with the development to serve the proposed use. 5. Sufficient public right-of-way for streets is being dedicated in the amount approved by the City's Public Works Department. The City of Wheat Darrel Pennington Page 2 October 20, 2003 With the following condition: The 37 residential lots shall be subject to the City's park land fee in lieu of land dedication and will be collected upon issuance of individual building permits. Finally, City Council approved Case No. SW-03-01, a request for approval of street width designation associated with Cases WZ-02-13 and WS-02-01, for the following reason: The proposed street width for Nelson Street, Newcomb Street, 53rd Avenue, and Ridge Road will meet the City standard requirements as specified in Section 26-416 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws. Enclosed is a draft copy of the minutes stating the Council's decision. Blackline photographic mylars of the final development plan & plat need to be submitted for recording with Jefferson County within 60 days of final action. The fees for recording with Jefferson County are $11 per page. Enclosed is a copy of our fee schedule. Please submit payment along with the mylars. Please feel free to contact me at 303-235-2846 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Kathy Fikd Administrative Asst. Enclosure: Draft of Minutes Fee Schedule cc: Richard Schierburg 1580 Lincoln St. Ste. 770 Denver, CO 80203 WZ-02-13, WS-02-01 & SW-03-01 (case files) 0...\My DocumentsWathy\PCRPTS\PLANOCOM\CORRESP\2003\WZ0213 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: OCTOBER 13, 2003 Page -2- PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ORDINANCES ON SECOND READING Item 1.A. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A FINAL PLAT AND FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 10285 RIDGE ROAD. (CASE NO. WZ-02-13 AND WS-02-01) (MELODY HOMES) Item 1. A. was introduced by Mrs. Rotola; executive summary read by the Clerk. Alan White was sworn in by the Mayor and presented the staff report. Darrell Pennington, representing Melody Homes, was sworn in by the Mayor. He complimented and thanked staff for their help. He outlined their plans for the development and asked for approval. Motion by Mrs. Rotola to approve Case No. MS-02-01, a request for approval of a Final Plat for property located at 10285 Ridge Road, for the following reasons: 1. All requirements of the City's Subdivision Regulations have been met. 2. The lot sizes meet or exceed the minimum lot sizes established in the Planned Residential Development and Planned Industrial Development zoning. 3. All required utility easements are being provided. 4. Adequate infrastructure will be constructed with the development to serve the proposed use. 5. Sufficient public right-of-way for streets is being dedicated in the amount approved by the City's Public Works Department. With the following condition: The 37 residential lots shall be subject to the City's parkland fee in lieu of land dedication and will be collected upon issuance of individual building permits; seconded by Mr. Mancinelli; carried 8-0. Motion by Mrs. Rotola to approve Case No. WZ-02-13, a request for approval of a Final Development Plan for the residential area of the property located at 10285 Ridge Road, for the following reasons: 1. The requirements of the City's Planned Development Regulations have been met. 2_ Adequate infrastructure will be constructed with the development to serve the proposed use. 3. The Final Development Plan meets the development standards set forth in the approved Outline Development Plan for the site. With the following condition: The installation of the required tree lawn and street trees shall be deferred until such time the Final Development Plan for Lot 1 of Block 4 is approved and construction commences; seconded by Mr. Gokey; carried 8-0. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: OCTOBER 13, 2003 Page -3- Item 1.B. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF STREET WIDTH DESIGNATION ASSOCIATED WITH CASES WZ-02-13 AND WS-02-01. (CASE NO. SW-03-01) (MELODY HOMES) Item 1. B. was introduced by Mr. Hanley, who also read the title and executive summary. Alan White presented the staff report. Mr. Edwards noted for the record that street width designation is not a quasi-judicial matter as stated in the Agenda and by the Mayor, but rather a matter that invites citizen input and dialogue with their Councilmembers. Steve Wilson, was sworn in by the Mayor. He is Vice President for Community Planning with Melody Homes. He suggested that the City improve Ridge Road at a later date, but they are willing to do whatever the City requires. Mr. Paranto stated that Wheat Ridge and Arvada had agreed as to what Ridge Road would look like in the future and that was the drawing shown to Council tonight. Arvada has accepted money in lieu of improvements and that money will be given to Wheat Ridge once construction commences. Motion by Mr. Hanley to approve Case No. SW-03-01 for the following reason: The proposed street width for Nelson Street, Newcomb Street, 53rd Avenue and Ridge Road will meet the City standard requirements as specified in Section 26-416 of the Wheat Ride Code of Laws; seconded by Mrs. Rotola. Motion by Ms. Figlus for an amendment to change the street width designation to 36' wide; seconded by Mr. Hanley; failed 2-6 with Ms. Figlus and Mr. Hanley voting yes. Original Motion carried 6-2 with Councilmembers Figlus and Hanley voting no. Ms. Figlus sees no reason why the road has to be this wide. Item 2. COUNCIL BILL 38-2003 -AMENDING CODE OF LAWS SECTION 15- 19, CONCERNING GRAFFITI. Council Bill 38-2003 was introduced on second reading by Mrs. Rotola, who also read the summary; Clerk assigned Ordinance No. 1309. Carmen Beery, explained that this Ordinance allowed anybody appointed by the City to give notice to property owners to remove graffiti; previously it had read "APCO Officers". Motion by Mrs. Rotola to approve Council Bill 38-2003 (Ordinance 1309) on second reading; seconded by Mr. Mancinelli. Request WZ-02-13 Melody Homes WS-02-01 Plat of a Final Development Plan ■ Public Hearing ■ City Council October 13, 2003 Property Location: 10285 Ridge Road Looking northeast across Ridge Rd. at site Looking west along Ridge Rd. Looking east along W. 5411i Ave. fits `i ^ 4 ci 1~~ ES ~ bst 2 Site Data: Size of Proiect 769,656 sq. ft. (17.67 acres) mt of open space: 209,647 sq. ft. ( 4.81 acres) (about 27%) isle Family lots: Average residential lot size - sq. ft. istrial lot: a Final Development Plan must be ssed prior to the industrial lot being developed. 3 Recommendation :ommends APPROVAL of the Final Plat the following condition: standard fee in lieu of parkland cation be collected prior to issuance of ding permits or the residential lots. Final Development Plan conforms to the dards as established in the Outline elonment Plan. e Final Plat meets all standards and criteria described in the Subdivision Regulations open space (labeled as Tracts on the Final t) will be maintained by the Homeowner's Recommendation tends APPROVAL of the Final Plan with the following condition: The installation of the required tree lawn and street trees shall be deferred until such time the Final Development Plan for Lot 1 Block 4 is approved and construction commences. 4 aF wHeq. ITEM NO: U m REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION c~LORP00 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 13, 2003 TITLE: A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A FINAL PLAT AND FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, WZ-02-13 & WS-02-01/MELODY ® PUBLIC HEARING ❑ ORDINANCES FOR I ST READING ❑ BIDS/MOTIONS ❑ ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING ❑ RESOLUTIONS Quasi-Judicial: 14 ® ❑ Yes No Director of Community Development City Manager EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Melody Homes is requesting approval of a Plat and Final Development Plan for property located 10285 Ridge Road. The plat will create 37 single-family lots and one industrial lot. The Final Development Plan only deals with the 37 single-family lots. A separate Final Development Plan must be processed and approved prior to development of the industrial lot. The property is currently vacant. The applicant wishes to construct 37 single-family structures. An Outline Development Plan was approved on September 8, 2003, which set the allowable uses and development standards for the property. The Outline Development Plan established a minimum lot size of 7,900 square feet for each residential lot. The residential lots as depicted on the Final Development Plan and Final Plat meet this minimum standard. The Outline Development Plan also established residential design standards that will create visual interest and physical difference between adjacent houses. The Homeowner's Association will maintain all tracts shown on the Final Plat and Final Development Plan. This proposed development will become a part of the already established Homeowner's Association for the two existing Melody Homes filings in Arvada. Planning Commission reviewed both requests on September 18, 2003 and recommended approval of the Final Plat with one condition, and approval of the Final Development Plan with several conditions. The applicant has agreed to all conditions. COMMISSION/BOARD RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission reviewed this case on September 18, 2003 and recommended approval of the Plat for the following reasons: 1. All requirements of the City's Subdivision Regulations have been met. 2. The lot sizes meet or exceed the minimum lot sizes established in the Planned Residential Development and Planned Industrial Development zoning. 3. All required utility easements are being provided. 4. Adequate infrastructure will be constructed with the development to serve the proposed use. 5. Sufficient public right-of-way for streets is being dedicated in the amount approved by the City's Public Works Department. With the following condition: The 37 residential lots shall be subject to the City's parkland fee in lieu of land dedication and will be collected upon issuance of individual building permits. Planning Commission also reviewed the Final Development Plan on September 18, 2003 and recommended approval for the following reasons: 1: The requirements of the City's Planned Development Regulations have been met. 2. Adequate infrastructure will be constructed with the development to serve the proposed use. 3. The Final Development Plan meets the development standards set forth in the approved Outline Development Plan for the site. With the following conditions: 1. Since the Final Development Plan pertains to the residential portion only, the Industrial Standards section on sheet 1 should be eliminated. 2. The typical front landscape detail needs to address any irrigation provided by the developer. 3. The maximum height for garages and sheds be changed from twenty feet to twelve feet. 4. The request by Melody Homes to defer construction of the tree lawn until such time as the industrial lot is developed be approved. No one was present at this public hearing to speak either in favor or opposition of these requests. A letter from a representative of Inland Container was entered into the record. STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES: The applicant has agreed to all conditions of approval as specified by the Planning Commission, and the plan set has been modified to reflect these conditions. Melody Homes is requesting a deferment of landscape improvements adjacent to the industrial lot on Ridge Road. Typically, these improvements would be required in conjunction with site development. Since Melody is not developing the industrial lot, maintenance of said landscaping improvements could be problematic. Staff agrees with the applicant and Planning Commission that the improvements should be deferred until such time the industrial lot is developed. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: None FINANCIAL IMPACT: The City has received a one-time application fee for the plat and the Final Development Plan. The City will receive a one-time fee for a building permit application for each lot in the subdivision. The City will also receive a one-time fee in lieu of parkland dedication. The residential properties will generate property tax revenues for the City. Residents of this area may shop at retail establishments in Wheat Ridge, and generate sales tax revenue, but residents will likely shop at more convenient locations in Arvada. There will be increased costs to the City in providing street maintenance and police services to the area. RECOMMENDED MOTIONS: FINAL PLAT "I move to approve case number MS-02-01, a request for approval of a Final Plat for property located at 10285 Ridge Road, for the following reasons: 1. All requirements of the City's Subdivision Regulations have been met. 2. The lot sizes meet or exceed the minimum lot sizes established in the Planned Residential Development and Planned Industrial Development zoning. 3. All required utility easements are being provided. 4. Adequate infrastructure will be constructed with the development to serve the proposed use. 5. Sufficient public right-of-way for streets is being dedicated in the amount approved by the City's Public Works Department. With the following condition: The 37 residential lots shall be subject to the City's parkland fee in lieu of land dedication and will be collected upon issuance of individual building permits. OR "I move to deny case number MS-02-01, a request for approval of a final plat for property located at 10285 Ridge Road, for the following reasons: FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN "I move to approve case number WZ-02-13, a request for approval of a Final Development Plan for the residential area of the property located at 10285 Ridge Road, for the following reasons: 1. The requirements of the City's Planned Development Regulations have been met. 2. Adequate infrastructure will be constructed with the development to serve the proposed use. 3. The Final Development Plan meets the development standards set forth in the approved Outline Development Plan for the site. With the following condition: 1. The installation of the required tree lawn and street trees shall be deferred until such time the Final Development Plan for Lot 1 of Block 4 is approved and construction commences. OR "I move to deny case number WZ-02-13, a request for approval of a Final Development Plan for the residential area of the property located at 10285 Ridge Road, for the following reasons: Report Prepared by: Travis Crane, 303.235.2849 Reviewed by: Alan White Attachments: 1. Planning Commission staff report with exhibits C:/Case Review/Melody/Melody FDP Plat Council Action Form CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission DATE OF MEETING: September 18, 2003 DATE PREPARED: September 11, 2003 CASE NO. & NAME: WZ-02-13 / Melody Homes CASE MANAGER: Mary Austin WS-02-01 / Melody Homes ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a 38-lot Final Plat and Final Development Plan. LOCATION OF REQUEST: NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT(S): 10285 Ridge Road Melody Homes 11031 Sheridan Blvd. Westminster, CO 80020 NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER(S): APPROXIMATE AREA: PRESENT ZONING: PRESENT LAND USE: SURROUNDING ZONING: SURROUNDING LAND USE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN State of Colorado 17.67 Acres (769,655.51 square feet) Planned Residential Development (PRD), Planned Industrial Development (PID) Vacant land E: A-1 S: PID, Industrial N:, & W: City of Arvada residential N_: Residential E: Public S: Industrial W: Vacant: Approved for Residential AER, Agricultural Estate Residential (1 unit/acre) DATE PUBLISHED: DATE POSTED: DATED LEGAL NOTICES SENT: July 3, 2003 July 1, 2003 July 3, 2003 ENTER INTO RECORD: ( ) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (X) ZONING ORDINANCE (X) SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) EXHIBITS (X) DIGITAL PRESENTATION The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. ATTACHMENT 1 I. REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a final plat for property located at 10285 Ridge Road (Exhibit 1, Zoning Map). The purpose of the request is to subdivide the property into 37 single- family residential lots and 1 industrial lot. The applicant is also requesting approval of the Final Development Plan for the residential component of the property. The rezoning of the property from A-1, Agricultural-One to PRD, Planned Residential Development and PID, Planned Industrial Development was approved by City Council on September 8, 2003. This request will create a final plat for the entire property and a Final Development Plan for the PRD, Planned Residential Development zoned area only. A Final Development Plan for the parcel zoned PID, Planned Industrial Development will be submitted at a future date. II. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING The required neighborhood meeting was held on June 19, 2002. A copy of the meeting summary and the sign-in sheets (Exhibit 2) are included with this report. III. FINAL PLAT The property being platted is approximately 17.67 acres in size (769,655.51 sq. ft.) and extends from Ridge Road (southern boundary) to W. 54 b Avenue (northern boundary). This plat is titled Skyline Estates Filing 3 (Exhibit 3, Final Plat). Skyline Estates Filing 1 and Filing 2 are located on adjacent property in the City of Arvada. This major subdivision creates 38 lots. Of these lots, 37 will be used for single family residential and 1 for industrial use. As required, the final plat shows the layout of lots and blocks, streets, drainage tracts and open space tracts. Of the total property area, the approximate site breakdown is as follows: residential lots comprise 43%, the industrial lot comprises 11%, open space and drainage tracts amount to 27%, and right-of-way dedication for streets takes in 18% of the total site area. Street dedication as reflected on the plat meets the requirements of the Public Works Department and is consistent with the street design shown on the proposed Final Development Plan. Easements have been reserved adjacent to the property lines as required by the City's Subdivision Regulations for utilities and access. Drainage tracts and open space tracts are dedicated to and will be maintained by the Homeowner's Association. The City Surveyor has reviewed the Final Plat for completeness, and has indicated that all requirements of the Subdivision Regulations have been met. Planning Commission Page 2 WZ-02-13 & WS-02-01/Melody Homes Residential Lots There will be a total of 37 single-family residential lots. The permitted uses in the PRD zoning area are limited to single family residences and typical accessory structures such as sheds and detached garages. The Outline Development Plan established the minimum lot size at 7,900 square feet. Each lot exceeds that minimum lot size requirement. The smallest lot is sized at 7,919 square feet and the largest lot is sized at 14,396 square feet. The average residential lot size is 9,564 square feet, which is approximately 0.21 acres in size. The Outline Development Plan established a staggered setback between 20 and 25 feet. Each lot allows for ample buildable area in meeting required setbacks. Open space is being provided in the amount of 4.81 acres. This amounts to 27% of the total site. Some of the open space will also function as drainage features. These areas are set up as tracts on this final plat. All tracts will be owned and maintained by the Homeowner's Association. Industrial Lot With this plat a single industrial parcel 2.01 acres in size is being created as Block 4, Lot 1. The lot will not be developed in the first phase with the residential lots. However, the public improvements and tree lawn along Ridge Road will be required in the first phase. IV. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN The development of the total site is planned to occur in two phases. The first phase will encompass the residential lots with associated improvements, streets, utilities, drainage improvements and all public improvements. The second phase will consist of the development of the industrial lot. This Final Development Plan pertains to the area of the property in PRD, Planned Residential Development zoning only (Exhibit 4, Final Development Plan). The industrial lot is not part of this Final Development Plan. A separate FDP for that lot will be required prior to development. Residential Homes The site will be developed with 37 single family residential homes. The use of the site for single family residential is allowed per the permitted uses established with the PRD zoning. Development of each home on an individual lot is subject to the residential development standards established with the Planned Residential Development zoning. Typical elevations for the homes are shown on sheets 5 thru 10 of the Final Development Plan. Each home must meet or exceed the development standards created with the residential zoning. Planning Commission Page 3 WZ-02-13 & WS-02-01/Melody Homes The first floor of each front elevation is required to have a minimum of 50% brick or stone with a 4-foot return along each side. Homes located on a corner lot or adjacent to an open space tract are required to have a minimum of 2 windows on that side, trim board enhancements, and variation in siding material. Additionally, no two homes with the same elevation and floor plan will be constructed on adjacent lots or lots across the street and there will not be two garage dominant models adjacent to each other. The homes in this development will be incorporated into the same homeowner's association set up for Filings 1 and 2 in the City of Arvada. This is noted on sheet 1 of the Final Development Plan document. Streets and Sidewalks Ridge Road and West 540i Avenue are currently in existence. Dedication of additional right-of- way is being required along the street frontages of Ridge Road and West 54 h Ave. Complete dedication of right-of-way for the local interior streets is required. All required dedication is reflected on the plat document. The planned street improvements are shown on the site plan. Ridge Road and W. 540i Avenue will be constructed with detached sidewalks and tree lawns. The interior streets of Nelson, Newcombe and W 53`d Ave. will be constructed with attached sidewalks. Street signs will be installed according to the approved signage plan on sheet 11, at the developer's expense. Street lighting, as designed by Xcel Energy, is also shown on sheet 11 and will be completed at the developer's expense. Landscanine The landscape plan is presented on sheets 13 and 14 of the Final Development Plan. Street trees will be planted in the tree lawn area along both Ridge Road and W. 54 h Avenue in compliance with the code standards of 1 tree per 30 feet of frontage. Street trees will also be planted by the developer in the tracts along Nelson St., Newcombe St., and W. 53`d Ave. Landscaping is planned for each of the 8 open space and drainage tracts. The landscaped areas of the open space and drainage tracts on this site total 4.81 acres (approx. 27% of the site). The homeowner's association will be responsible for the maintenance of all tracts and drainage areas. The residential lots closest to the industrial lot will be buffered by landscaping in the open space tracts along W 53`d Avenue. The landscape plan also includes a typical drawing of the front yard landscaping that will be provided for each home site by the developer. The front yard of each residence shall be planted with a minimum of 1 street tree, 7 shrubs and turf lawn. Planning Commission Page 4 WZ-02-13 & WS-02-O1/Melody Homes Fencin¢ Project fencing is shown on the landscape plan. Lots adjacent to open space and drainage tracts will have fencing provided by the developer. Perimeter fencing with brick columns will enclose the backs of the lots along W 54d' Avenue and W53 Id Avenue. The solid perimeter fence for tracts E and F along W 53`d Ave. will aid in buffering the lots from the future development on the industrial lot. Fencing of the 3 rail type will be placed around the lots next to tract G at the northern end of Nelson St. and Newcombe St. Solid wood privacy fencing is provided for the rear of those lots along Nelson St. that back to the drainage pond and channel on the east end of the site. Privacy fencing for the rear and sides of the other lots will be up to the individual homeowners to coordinate amongst themselves. V. AGENCY REFERRALS The City Surveyor has reviewed the final plat document for completeness and has indicated that it is in compliance with the City's Subdivision Regulations. Xcel Energy can serve the property with requested utility easements adjacent to the front and rear lot lines for the installation and maintenance of utilities. These easements are noted and shown graphically on the plat document. A final drainage report and plan has been approved by the City's Public Works Department. The Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD) has given their approval of the drainage report and plan for the site, particularly the improvements for the Columbine Basin channel along the north side of Ridge Road. All outside service agencies will serve the property when developed. Any necessary system improvements, taps and meters will be at the developer's expense. Arvada Fire District will provide service to the property. A traffic impact study has been reviewed and approved by the City's Traffic Engineer. Public improvements along Ridge Road are required and will be constructed by the developer. The developer will construct all public improvements required for the safe movement of vehicles. The Consolidated Juchem Ditch and Reservoir Company has agreed to the realignment of the Juchem Ditch through the property and the enclosing of the ditch in pipe. The Parks and Recreation Department has requested fees in lieu for parkland dedication. Staff is requesting the installation of detached sidewalk and tree lawn adjacent to the industrial lot be completed at the time of construction of the residential development. These improvements would be maintained by the owner of the industrial lot. Melody Homes is requesting a deferment of constructing the sidewalk and tree lawn until such time as the industrial lot is developed. Planning Commission Page 5 WZ-02-13 & WS-02-01/Melody Homes VI. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION Staff concludes that the Final Plat meets the requirements of the City's subdivision regulations. The Final Development Plan meets the requirements of the City's planned development regulations and is in compliance with the approved Outline Development Plan for the property. Therefore, staff recommends Approval of Case No. MS-02-01, Final Plat and WZ-02-13, Final Development Plan. VII. RECOMMENDED MOTIONS Each component of this application, the Final Plat and Final Development Plan, should be addressed with a separate motion. Final Plat Option A: "I move that Case No. MS-02-01, a request for approval of a Final Plat for 38 lots on property located at 10285 Ridge Road, be APPROVED for the following reasons: 1. All requirements of the City's Subdivision Regulations have been met. 2. The lot sizes meet or exceed the minimum lot sizes established in the Planned Residential Development and Planned Industrial Development zoning. 3. All required utility easements are being provided. 4. Adequate infrastructure will be constructed with the development to serve the proposed use. 5. Sufficient public right-of-way for streets is being dedicated in the amount approved by the City's Public Works Department. With the following condition: 1. The 37 residential lots shall be subject to the City's parkland fee in lieu of land dedication and will be collected upon issuance of individual building permits. Option B: "I move that Case No. MS-02-01, a request for approval of a Final Plat for 38 lots on property located at 10285 Ridge Road, be DENIED for the following reasons: 1. Planning Commission Page 6 WZ-02-13 & WS-02-0I/Melody Homes Final Development Plan Option A: "I move that Case No. WZ-02-13, a request for approval of a Final Development Plan for the residential area of the property located at 10285 Ridge Road, be APPROVED for the following reasons: 1. The requirements of the City's Planned Development Regulations have been met. 2. Adequate infrastructure will be constructed with the development to serve the proposed use. 3. The Final Development Plan meets the development standards set forth in the approved Outline Development Plan for the site. With the following conditions: 1. Since the Final Development Plan pertains to the residential portion only, the Industrial Standards section on sheet 1 should be eliminated. 2. The typical front landscape detail needs to address any irrigation provided by the developer. Option B: "I move that Case No. WZ-02-13, a request for approval of a Final Development Plan for the residential area of the property located at 10285 Ridge Road, be DENIED for the following reasons: 1. Planning Commission Page 7 WZ-02-13 & WS-02-O1/Melody Homes kD 3 z 5E 76 OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WHEAT RIDGE COLORADO PARCELILOT BOUNDARY (DESIGNATES OWNERSHIP) WATER FEATURE ' DENOTES MULTIPLE ADDRESSES 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN (APPROXIMATE LOCATION) NE 16 J. i3®S •;x •r DEPAKTMEW OF MAP ADOPTED. Jut" 15, 1991 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Last REvisiM: SeMaMb r 10. 2001 FYI4109T , 7500 West 29" Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215 City of Wheat Ridge Telephone (303) 235-2846 Fax(303)235-2857 Neighborhood Meeting Summary Date: June 19, 2002 City Staff Present: Mary Austin, Planner Michael Garcia, Development Review Engineer U Location of Meeting: Wheat Ridge Municipal Building, 2" floor conference room Property Address: 10285 Ridge Road Property Owner: Sate of Colorado Property Owner Present? No Applicant: Melody Homes Applicant Present? Yes Existing Zoning: A-1 Comp Plan Designation: AER (1 unit/acre) Existing use/site conditions: Vacant land Applicants proposal: To rezone the property from A-1 to PRD and PID and receive approval of an Outline Development Plan, Final Development Plan and Final Plat. The applicant intends to develop the site with 37 single family residential homes and an industrial area along Ridge Road. Issues discussed: Questions were posed regarding plans for the industrial area. Melody Homes commented that the industrial area is planned to be compatible with the industrial area in the City of Arvada along Ridge Road. It is not planned to be an intensive manufacturing area. The industrial area will p\most likely not be a part of the homeowners association. Maintenance of Ridge Road: The road is entirely within the City of Wheat Ridge and will be maintained by Wheat Ridge. Questions were raised about the keeping of large animals on the residential lots. Melody Homes responded that the covenants will likely prohibit large animals and they will not be listed as a permitted use. Traffic circulation: A traffic impact study will be required to be submitted by Melody Homes and approved by the City. EXHIBIT 2 (O co -f m Ul A co N O W A ~ i A r L4 0 w 0 W r Z bI °s Q q~ p, LAI ~ o w W W r w lz fll fD D rZ CL CD N N M Z D X m m p z 3 2 W (n Q c z C) m O z ? m om v = D 9 Z cn C L m M a ) r"r v m m ~ m z =i Z O (fl co V 0) cn l~ W N I I l I 1~~ I~ N i I a W N 1 0 D Q CL c''D y N 0 r m D m z z m cn L C Z Z m z~ mo mN Z m m N = Z g W rr. O " v = a O (am O W3v vm~ N m o z Z O POSTING CERTIFICATION CASENO. W2-02 13 WS C~-O~ PLANNING COMMISSION / CITY COUNCIL / BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (Circle One) HEARING DATE: ,~~e yzez 134 ~205 I, residing at (name) (address) as the applicant for Case No. A1kNlrc. , hereby certify that I have posted the Notice of Public Hearing at e,n-„ 1-i j~ ;Z,PC~-r- (location) on this /34 day of 20, and do hereby certify that said sign has been posted and remained in place for fifteen (15) days prior to and including the scheduled day of public hearing of this case. The sign was posted in the position shown on the map below. Signature: NOTE: This form must be submitted at the public hearing on this case and will be placed in the applicant's case file at the Community Development Department. MAP e:lplan ni nglformslposti ngeert Rev. 1/1103 k = (DTI -4 # 1Z-~~-~~1-vf MetroS~/"can / fersoi. Owner :State Of Colorado Schedule :042821 Site :10285 Ridge Rd Wheat Ridge 80033 7003 0500 0004 7661 2227 Mail :3550 W Oxford Ave Denver Cc 80236 LandUse :9129 Exempt,State,Land Price :$44 Tax Dist :1062 OwnerPh Bedrm: Bth: YB:1958 Parking: Firepl: TotArea:380,869 Ac:86.80 # 2 * MetroScan / Jefferson Owner :Lic Investments Inc Schedule :085141 Site :5000 Oak St Wheat Ridge 80033 - Mail :4030 Vincennes Rd Indianapolis In 46268 7003 0500 0004 7661 2234 LandUse :3112 Ind,Improved Land rice Tax Dist :3105 OwnerPh Bedrm: Bth: YB:1970 Parking: Firepl: TotArea:157,936 Ac:8.85 # 3 : MetroScan / Jefferson----------- Owner :Coors Brewing Company Schedule :136211 Site :10619 W 50th Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 7003 0500 Op04 7661 2241 Mail :PO Box 4030 Golden Co 80401 LandUse :3112 Ind,Improved Land Price TaxDist :3105 OwnerPh Bedrm: Bth: YB:1968 Parking: Firepl: TotArea:442,406 Ac:27.05 # 4 MetroScan / Jefferson Owner :H F Investment Company Llc Schedule :193783 Site :*no Site Address* - nn nnv Mail :2401 E 2nd Ave #250 Denver Co 80206 7003 0500 0004 71,61 2258 LandUse :1111 Vacant,Residential Price TaxDist :1062 OwnerPh Bedrm: Bth: YB: Parking: Firepl: TotArea: Ac:6.29 # 5 MetroScan / Jefferson • Owner :Melody Homes Inc Schedule :433389 Site :*no Site Address* - ni~ Mail :11031 Sheridan Blvd Westminster Co 80020 7003 0500 0004 7661 2265 LandUse :1177 Vacant,Residential,Limited Size Price TaxDist :1007 OwnerPh Bedrm: Bth: YB: Parking: Firepl: TotArea: Ac:.ll # 6 : MetroScan / Jefferson : Owner :Munson Frederick J/Barbara J Schedule :435831 Site :10802 W 54th P1 Arvada 80002 Mail :10802 W 54th P1 Arvada Cc 80002 7003 0500 0004 7661 2272 LandUse :1112 Res,Improved Land Price :$336,980 TaxDist :1007 OwnerPh . Bedrm:3 Bth:2.25 YB:2003 Parking:Attached Firepl:2 TotArea:2,509 Ac:.22 #7 ; MetroScan / Jefferson Owner :Olivas Jeffrey Schedule :435832 Site :10822 W 54th P1 Arvada 80002 Mail :10822 W 54th P1 Arvada Co 80002 7003 0500 0004 7661 228 LandUse :1112 Res,Improved Land Price :$286,800 TaxDist :1007 OwnerPh Bedrm:3 Bth:2.50 YB:2003 Parking:Attached Firepl:l TotArea:2,056 Ac:.18 # 8 : MetroScan / Jefferson Owner :Gyurdiev Valeri Schedule :435892 Site :10562 W 54th P1 Arvada 80002 - Mail :10562 w 54th P1 Arvada co 80002 7003 0500 0004 7661 2296 LandUse :1112 Res,Improved Land Price :$294,400 - TaxDist :1007 OwnerPh Bedrm:3 Bth:2.25 YB:2003 Parking:Attached Firepl:l TctArea:1,958 Ac:.28 # 9 MetroScan / Jefferson Owner :Tzinov Rumen Schedule :435893 Site :10582 W 54th P1 Arvada 80002 - _,a 191 na 102 Mail :10582 w 54th P1 Arvada Co 80002 7003 0500 0004 7661 2302 LandUse :1112 Res,Improved Land Price , TaxDist :1007 OwnerPh Bedrm:3 Bth:2.25 YB:2003 Parking:Attached Firepl:l TotArea:2,393 Ac:.31 sin FOR 6 Z d3S Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. # 10 MetroScan / Jeffersoi Owner :Depinto Anthony D/Elaine J Schedule :435894 Site :5404 Oak St Arvada 80002 - Mail :5404 oak St Arvada Cc 80002 7003 0500 0004 7661 2319 LandUse :1112 Res,Improved Land Price TaxDist :1007 OwnerPh Bedrm:3 Bth:2.25 YB:2003 Parking:Attached Firepl: TotArea:2,074 Ac:.16 # 11 : MetroScan / Jefferson • Owner :Hartman Marlene Schedule :435895 Site :5414 Oak St Arvada 80002 n=.---I •49 167. 05 028 Mail :5414 Oak St Arvada co 80002 7003 0500 0004 7661 2326 LandUse :1112 Res,Improved Land , TaxDist :1007 OwnerPh Bedrm:3 Bt'h:2.25 YB:2003 Parking:Attached Firepl:l TotArea:1,782 Ac:.22 # 12 MetroScan / Jefferson Owner :Schumacher Kevin Schedule :435903 Site :5411 Nelson St Arvada 80002 n=-^o1 :39 161 05 020 Mail :5411 Nelson St Arvada Co 80002 7003 0500 0004 7661 2333 LandUse :1112 Res,Improved Land TaxDist :1007 OwnerPh Bedrm:4 Bth:1.75 YB:2003 Parking:Attached Firepl:l TotArea:1,958 Ac:.20 # 13 : MetroScan / Jefferson Owner :Ogawa Kazuyo Schedule :435904 Site :5401 Nelson St Arvada 80002 •~Q iri n5 019 Mail :5401 Nelson St Arvada Cc 80002 7003 0500 0004 7661 2340 LandUse :1112 Res,Improved Land Price , TaxDist :1007 OwnerPh Bedrm:4 Bth:2.25 YB:2003 Parking:Attached Firepl: TotArea:2,086 Ac:.16 # 14 MetroScan / Jefferson • Owner :Kidd Marie S Schedule :435905 Site :10611 W 54th Ave Arvada 80002 Mail :10611 W 54th Ave Arvada Cc 80002 7003 D500 0004 7661 2357 LandUse :1112 Res,Improved Land rice :~320,4UU TaxDist :1007 OwnerPh Bedrm:3 Bth:1.75 YB:2003 Parking:Attached Firepl:l TotArea:2,074 Ac:.17 # 15 : MetroScan / Jefferson Owner :Anderson Mark Schedule :435906 Site :10631 W 54th Ave Arvada 80002 Mail :10631 W 54th Ave Arvada Cc 80002 7003 05D0 0004 7661 2364 LandUse :1112 Res,Improved Land rice :$355,700 TaxDist :1007 OwnerPh :303-650-6036 Bedrm:4 Bth:2.50 YB:2003 Parking:Attached Firepl:l TotArea:2,697 Ac:.27 # 16 MetroScan / Jefferson • Owner :Piccone Anthony J Schedule :435907 Site :10651 W 54th Ave Arvada 80002 7003 0500 0004 7661 2371 Mail :10651 W 54th Ave Arvada Co 80002 LandUse :1112 Res,Improved Land Price :$327,500 TaxDist :1007 OwnerPh Bedrm:3 Bth:2.25 YB:2003 Parking:Attached Firepl:l TotArea:2,511 Ac:.27 # 17 : MetroScan / Jefferson Owner :Nowicki Emily Schedule :435908 Site :10671 W 54th Ave Arvada 80002 •4A 161. 05 031 Mail :10671 w 54th Ave Arvada Co 80002 7003 0500 0004 7661 2388 LandUse :1112 Res,Improved Land TaxDist :1007 OwnerPh Bedrm:3 Bth:2.25 YB:2003 Parking;Att ed Firepl:l TotArea:2,052 Ac:.27 # 18 Met Scam efferson Owner :Shrum David K ` Schedule :435909 Site :10691 W 54th Ave Arvada 80002 CtItache ~---I • 1q 1 61 05 030 Mail :10691 w 54th Ave Arvada Co 800 7003 0500 0004 7661 2395 LandUse :1112 Res,Improved Land TaxDist :1007 OwnerPh :303-456-7917 Bedrm:3 Bth:2.25 YB:2003 ParkingFirepl:l TotAre :2,338 s 9 n• EON 6 Z d39 1 to y' Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations O or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. KIRKHAM MICHAEL Fax:303-694-2822 Oct 2 _j03 14:31 P.07 07/03/03 THU 11:30 FAX 10002 pigp}~p N1JIL F1139744 il3p/2003 4eSI.00 60Pat C.FEES~i6 0.66 p4a FEE%Ili TEFFERSW Cm1NTY, CaC6RRp0 . Locadon Along Ridy find and well of Mdkn Smee1 whradW lle, Cobnda 5003 wawa pd➢nf O1S11 CLAIR4 pG D£4D -10 Wow ALL MEN By TIMSE pR1 SCNT13, ftl di, Sears at Colorado, afdlog by Sad tbmutb the 17apa[ of Saman ScrOen (Gnatarl, wheat WthasS a 1575 Sltamaa Street. Dsavsr, Catedty of DE rplmada, 80203, for the dxmsidadtaiea of TE~i i sett 1'~t]t16 OC1L4nR5 (S10-a0) do . aecsptance, sditfieieney, 4nd rcaipi afu+aich is lsxahY ae3TOa3!bged, da hcseby tense, re- IwsQ sell, coevcy and QN7R7' CS,AUIf wqa she Cisy of Wheal Rldja, a muniupal ao[paraiion m f.-,e Searle afCabndo, w)pse atldreu is 7500 Wa~1`29.0Jt Avrnva, Wheat lodge, Cotm[y el'7c£fccsan, Slade of d 80033, liar 34dC[eatare and aSSIgiW Lac.", ll[ tife'sf$hn liila, iniM6T, Claim and demandwluet, Cy{pPadn, K Dradntor his in aadm d}1e follorrag rest propcny, in Ilde City of Whcet R1dCc, County of lelfertad, Suits of Colorado, to wit; TMeeparcels of land lying in Semen IC Township 3 Smd+, Raage 69 Wca of the fnh Prmcipal meiiliw. Cby of When Ridge, County ofJeffiza®, Steil of Colorado, dcseribcd as follows' Refer to aaached Exhibit A far a dcsaripaol of Parrots A, C and D. Said parecls aanctiddmg Parcel A: 11,473 square teed. (0.26 aatny taoie ar Icsa; pared C: 70,668 ggdwrc feet, (0.47 acdss).11W Or kaa; and pareel D: ZD,666 agtruc fast. (0.<7 aaes)modc ar kss, Seid parcels lotra need W. Rigid-oi Way will, all Sw opmumncrs, slid do goit-aWim'amy'inicrest to the same suhfecd so eascdoears, nahis of way Wild mstriNeoads of record, if uy.l ; Sided x003. By aAd'Sjucofh the Depankl2cI of human Semiua Gsaetlr t4 The foregatrlg instmmad was acaaanM1algad before me due day ofS'J~".2003, by hd= f L'ei non Nmam,a,a. F ti D,risaor Rimlincril holy rr Wlmess my hood and oficiit Seal. raw S4v[Jldl1! r., Car.aYq yi Cek W r,Kmacr o.,e,.wwq.......~........ _ =33 3 VA pM is ia1 ne(la?yi rotrmnwoN cons00.prcoac as edm'Idulfafd,ama" load ad Ridge, 751DW.IP9a Awt. Cetanda 501 (glanale, gartmtmga naamacnod e,xrry KIRKHAM MICHAEL 07/03/03 TJW 11:30 FAY Fax:303-694-2822 RIDGY ROAD PARCEL A Oct 2 _.,03 14:31 P.08 LEGAL, DESCRIPTION OCTOBER 16, 2002 A PARCEL OF LAND BEXWG A PART OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGR fig 'MOST OF THE 672 PRINCIPAL NERIDAANs CITY OF WHEAT' xxDGB, COUNTY OF 0EFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PA7t'V,TCOLrARLY I)ICSC!XXBVD AS FOLLOWS' COM RAC490 AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TIM WORT ST QUARTER OF $ATD SECTION 16; THENCE NORTH 00°13111° WEST,. ALONG THE EAST LXNE OF THE SOUTHEAST QtMxTER OF TEE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF 3A= SECTION 16, A DISTANCE OF 50.53 FEET TO A POINT ON Tan NORTT3ERLY RIM(T-OF-WAY LINE OF RIDGE ROAD AS RECORDED TN HOOK 184 AT PAM 132 OF THE JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERIC AND RECORDER'S OFFICE, SAID. POINT BRING THR POINT OF. BEGINNING Tf1MM SOUTH 74°381300 WEST, ALONG SAIp NORTHERLY RIGXT-OF=WAY LINE, A DISTX0C$ OF 570.73 FRET" TO A POINT; 7.'Imm NORTH DO°OO'320 EAST A DISTANM OF 20.74. FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF A PARCEL OF LAM AS DESCRIBED UNDER RECCEPTION No. P0768588 OF SAID CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE; THENCE NORTH 74°38.30" EAST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL„ A DISTANCE OF. 570.64 FEET TQ A POINT ON SAID. EAST LINE OF TUB SOVTBFAST QUARTER OF THE NORTBURR9T QUARTER OF SECTION 16; THENCE SOUTH 00013.11.. PAST, ALONG SAID EAST LIM, A, DISTANCE OF 20.72 FEET, TOO THE POINT. GO T3EGTWENG. C019TALNING 11,413 SQUARE vVET (0.26 ACRES) MORE OR LESS. pac8 x or x IM003 Exhibi= A AAA@ 1 of 9 KIRKHAM MICHAEL Fax:303-694-2822 Oct 2 _.,03 14:32 P.10 SABXS~OF BEARINGS. FOR THE PURPOSS OF THIS DESCRIPTION, TITS BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE WEST LINN OF THE SOUTEWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHR"T QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP.3 SOUTH, RA=X 69 WEST OF THE 6TR PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AS BEARING NORTH 000131110 WEST. TUN SO9TMMST CORNER OF TER NORTHEAST OF J "TD SECTION 16 IS MONiNA=ED BY A 3 1/4° ERASS CAP sTAxpYD "CITY OF WSM&T RSDGE L9 13212n. THE XORTEWEST CDRN= or TKE SORT! MST 1/4 OF THE NORTNE"T X OF SAID SECTION 16 19 MOB BY A 20 ALnXXVUX CAP STAMPED:'PLS 190030. PREPARED BY%GEORCW d. Si'4XTRO P.L.S. #19003 ON BIERA Y OF: 1CIRRHAM, MICHAEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS 5600 SOUTH {QVMBEC STREET, SUITE 2007] GREENWOOD VXW AGX, COLORADO 90111 (303)694-2300 x:\030ala\AnP-uaaala~aut~er\legalP~Parcel A.duG PACs 2 or 3 Exhibit A Page 2 of 9 KIRKHAM MICHAEL Fax:303-694-2822 Oct 2 _.,03 14:31 P.09 RIDGE ROAD PARCEL C LZOAI, _DBSCRIPTION OCTOBER 4, 2002 t~ A, 60-VOOT WIDE PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PART OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN BOOR 1492 AT PAGE 38 OF THE JEFFERSON CoUk= CNVEX AND RECORDER'S OFFICE, SITUATED IN THEY SOUTHWEST X oz' THU NOXTREAST 96 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOTRZ, RANGE 69 WEST OF TEES 6TH. PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHSAX RIDGE, COUNTY OF .7EFI+ERSON, STAIR OF COLORADO. BEING MORE PARTICMJMLT DESCRZBED AS FOLLOWS- COMMENC]LXG AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST % Or SAID GEfCY,CION 16, THENCE NORTH 00°13'11° WEST, ALONG TSB WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST. X, A DISTANCE OF 71.25 FRAT TO A POINTO THENCE NORTH 74°38'30"' EAST A DISTANCE 08 688,90 VEST TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL AS DESCRIBED X14 BOOS. 1492 AT PAGE 38 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; TICENM COWINUING NORTH 74°38130° BAST A DISTANCE OF 344_45 FEET TO A POINT ON THE BAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE SOUTH 00°12'53^' RASP, ALONG SAID EAST. LINE, A DISTANCR OF 62.16 FEET TO A POZNT. OWN "M NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAT LINE OF THE BURLINdTON NOR"WRBRN RAILROAD, THENCE SODTEE 74°3B'30" WEST, ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RXMM-OS-*AY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 344.45 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID. WEST LINE; THENCE NORTH 0012'59^ WEST, ALONG SAID WEST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 62.16 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 20,668 S40AREE FEET 40.47 ACRES) MORE OR LESS. Nr. { of3 Exhibit A Page 4 of 9 KIRKHAM MICHAEL 01/03/03 TIM 11:31 FAX Fax:303-694-2822 QUITCLAIM DEED Oct 2 _j03 14:29 P.02 THIS DEED, made This ``day of r4figiL, 2003 between 16 008 H. F. INVESTMENT COMPANY, LLC, A Colorado limited liability company, rJVfRPROf. t1 3V 743 whose legal address is 2401 E. 2„a Ave., Suite 250 REAJ3o/2EE, 9:36:08 PG: DO L-005 Denver, CO $0206 pROE FEE: 26.00 DOE FEE. 4.90 RECORDED IN JEFFERSON COUNTY4 COLORADO and as "Grantor" CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE A municipal corporation, whose legal address is 7500 West W Ave., Wheat Ridge, CO $0033 as "Grantee" WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, fat and in consideration of 51.00 and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufl'ir:iency of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby remise, release, sell, convey and QUITCLAIM unto Grantee, its heirs, successor and assigns, forever, all the right, title, intermit, claim and danand which the Grantor has in and to the following real property, together with all impmvernents, if any, situate, lying and being thereon, in the County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, as described on Exhibit "A;" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, 4•Frrantor has executed this deed on the date set forth abovc. Mrs ta,2na STATE OF COLORADO } )ss. COUNTY OF DENVSoe } H. F INVESTMENT COMPANY, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company E Nam . Marlin T. Hart Its; Manager The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of #AtZrL 2003 by Martin T. Han, Manager for H. F, tnvestment Company, LL My commission expires: to//4/ab Witness my hand and official seal.' Notary Public KIRKHAM MICHAEL Fax:303-694-2822 Oct 2 J03 14:30 P.06 07/03/03. THU 11:31 FAR 005 DRAWMt !$\D10414\LDD-010414\SUkVEY\DVERALL PARCEL 2.OWG . ' - MODIFIED; Fri 03/14/03 1:29!OW. 6Y:,6i>~68 caleA.~"xafiD...~o 3r~+Yd16lT.++r$Wtml3rma.ei+ a a.exr..w .~c,..,w c®v:u~rnoe car r.wi EXHIBIT w~a Q 0 m U w en ~ OQ C j a 0. tq I \1 -r I T I `I I I I ~ FLO 1 0l I I I w 1 I r-T--I T 1-TX Fr-- I Tr^ { I / I I ,1 1 10 11 1 1 Ir-\ '>J1 "'Y'" 1T 1 T'Z 1 T'1 t i i l l l l i l 3 it 1 1 1 I I I I 'IdP' it t 1 .1 L1 F" 2 i~~ J- : I l f l l l aIz 1 1 1 1 1 1 ++++A I IWI I l l l t i I r 1 `t-~r-r 1--1 ,r-1 r r-r- r ! i l l i l l l( I l i f t l l 60 4 50 120 ORIGINAL SCALE: 1"=60' OVERALL ROAD MELODY HOMES PARCEL, LOCATIONS d W U L^N MICHAEL COMULTMG DNGSNYY,49 KIRKHAM MICHAEL 07/03/03 THU 11=31 PAX Fax:303-694-2822 EXHIBIT A RIDGE ROAD.. PARCEL B LEGAL D$SCRIFTION Oct 2 -~03 14:29 P.03 .OCTOBER 4, 2002 A 60 SOOT WIDE PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE SOUTHWEST X OF THE NORTHEAST X OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF-THE 6TH PRINCIPAL 198RIDIM, CITY OF wRxAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO, BRING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIHED AS FOLLOWS: COMt4F.NCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST 9 OF SAID SECTION IS, THENCE NORTH 00° 13' 11- WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST W. A DISTANCE OF 9.09 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF--WAY LINE OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD, SAID POINT HEYNG THU POINT OF llX0n NxNG,- THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WEST LINE, NORTH 00°13'11'• W857', 'A DISTANCE OF 62.16 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST COMM OF A PARCEL - OF LAMA AS DESCRIBED UNDER RECEPTION No. $6158518 OF THE' JEFFERSON COUNTY CLBRR ANA RECORDER'S OFFICHY THENCE NORTH 74°39'30" EAS'T', ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL, A DISTANCE OF 688.90 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL, SAID POINT LYING ON THE WEST LINE OF A PAXCSL OF LAND AS DESCRISRD zN BOOR 1492 AT PAGE 36 OF SAID CLERIC AND RECORDXi'5 OFFICE; THENCE SODT'H! 00012'59" EAST, ALONG SAID WRST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 62.19 FEET TO A FOIL ON SAT'D'NORTBT;RIIY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE: THENCE SOUTH 74°38.300 WEST. ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WRY LINE. A DISTANCE OF 668.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF BECINNTNG. CONTAINING 41,334 SQUARE FEET (0_95 ACRES) MORE OR LESS- 0006 3 Page 1 on KIRKHAM MICHAEL Fax:303-694-2822 Oct 2 _103 14:30 P.04 ur/vJ/u~ 3riV 11:42 rAA _ a• BASIS OF BEARINGS: FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS ASCRIPTION, THE BEARINGS ARE RASED ON THE WEST LINE OF TAE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SBCTIO14 16. TOWNSHIP 3 SODTX, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AS HEARING NORTH 00-13'31" WEST. THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORThEAST 5( OF SAID SECTION 16 IS XONUMSNTED BY A 3 119" $RASS CAP STAMPED "CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LS 13212". THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUCBWSST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAS'AX OF SAID SECTION 16 IS MONDMENTED BY A 2" ALUKXRUM-CAP STAMPEO;"FLS 19003". PREPARED By. GEORGE G. SMITH. JR., P.L.S. . P.L.S. 019003 ON BEHALF OF. XXXXBAH. MICHAEL CONSULTING. ENOXNEERS 5604 SOUTH QUEBEC STREET, SUITE 200D GREENWOOD VILLAG)9, COLORAnO 80111 (303)694-2300 - it.\OiGplf~Cpo-oio-pl4\Su:+.ey\lcgal5\Aeccel H.dx PAW 2 of 3 IRDo, 4 KIRKHAM MICHAEL Fax:303-694-2822 Oct 2-_j03 14:30 P.05 07/03/03 THU 11:32 FAX _ [a 068 ~x~n~ N: ~u~.~~-ataau~sursu[Y~vAttm e.wdc • Srp{t 1` w _ MO CYiMOLR nRC lv bt Y+pC Yp ppF bRw4nC 1e{NGyT R'lllTi@! IDfWdSfM p/ Y.gwW Nlpy.yn LOwsl$N~G {YCppCC11§, N wow ~d ttf~~C im- ~Yt7 Z p d EXHIBIT PARCEL B 1 u°'r ifli u y b4 ^ff 1 S U d 0. 64 O 60 1ZO ORIGINAL SCALE: 10=60' o 1 Asa 0 0 fl a )In a C U} 4. g . rn ee 1 r Li ::3 I~ M ,n 7- Z C-4 e Co z m to a° i z `O WT 1 r , N L] o et a0 ~ 10 In CL i?5 z z rr xM z z wo~ = 3 z T17 ff} t.., (n ti W WEST LINE, SW 1/4. NE 1/4, SEC. 16, T3S. R69W a NOO-1311 W (BASIS OF BEARING) R NCIE: IS E*0817 DOES NOT REPRESENT A NO MONMENTED LAND SURVEY. IT IS t ONLY INTENDED TO DEPICT THE - .ATTACMd) LEDAL DE5COPTION. ly O F ~ W to U zp.2 a r> Q W i° El -1 d o 0 a w ..(J rwzM~ P4 vii IN2 wre 3 " RIDGE ROAD oreea ea MICHALEL _ °M "O` PARC64 H ~ eoNeerL'rnac strenaa~ 7500 West 29th Avenue The City of Ridge FAX 303/235-2857 September 29, 2003 Dear Property Owner: This is to inform you of Case No. WZ-02-13 which is a request for approval of a final development plan for property located at 10285 Ridge Road and Case No. WS-02-01 which is a request for approval of a 38-lot major subdivision plat for property located at 10285 Ridge Road. These cases will be heard by the Wheat Ridge City Council in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue. The meeting will be held on October 13, 2003 at 7:00 p.m. As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at 303-235-2846. Thank you. Planning Division. C Mocuments and Seuinps ffihyWy Oowmnm\Kathy\CC"TSTP NOTIC@003\wa0213&ws0201.wpd * Search Parameters * Jefferson (CO) * 9/29/2003 * 9:08 AM Parcel Number ...20 39 161 00 001 39 161 05 012 39 161 05 018 39 161 05 029 39 161 05 030 39 161 05 028 39 161 05 031 39 161 05 034 39 161 05 033 39 161 05 032 39 161 05 019 39 161 05 020 39 161 04 102 39 161 04 101 39 162 06 072 39 162 06 071 39 162 00 007 39 164 01 002 39 164 01 003 39 164 01 004 T ~G ~G City of Wheat Ridge Deparbnent of Public Works MEMORANDUM TO: Travis Crane, Planner FROM: Dave Brossman, Development Review Engineer DATE: Tuesday, October 7, 2003 SUBJECT: Right-of-Way Issue for Skyline Filing #3 Dear Travis, I received a voice message yesterday (Monday 10/06) from Darrel Pennington regarding the Ridge Road Right-of-Way. The following is the long-winded version of the issue at hand. I am aware of the Right-of-Way (Quit Claim) deeds having been recorded. As soon as the City Council approved the Right-of-Way, I took the deeds to the County on April 306 and recorded them myself. The fact the deeds have been recorded does not necessarily mean the issue of conveyance of land title has been resolved. One must keep in mind that any document may be recorded by simply handing the document to one of the personnel in the County Clerk and Recorders Office. The State has assigned authority to the County Clerk and Recorders office the sole responsibility of maintaining every recorded document. The County Assessor's office has sole responsibility of ensuring the accuracy of the recorded document, prior to title conveyance per the Legal Description and ownership information shown on the recorded deed or plat (to accurately assess taxes). In the case of documents being recorded that involve the transfer of land title, the County Assessor's Office must accept the deed or plat in order for the transfer of that title to be complete. I don't know if the ownership issue was ever reconciled with the Assessor's office or not. As long as the deeds are not accepted, the title to the Right-of-Way has not been officially conveyed (in the eyes of the County) to the City and therefore does not exist in the County's records. The prior property owner(s) will continue to be assessed taxes on the land that was to be dedicated, etc., and the Right-of-Way along Ridge Road shall continue to be questionable. As to the current issue, about 6-8 weeks after I recorded the deeds I received a phone call from one of the County deed specialists stating that there was a problem regarding the ownership as stated on the deeds, and the County was not going to accept the deeds as recorded. I don't know if you remember the history of the parcels involved, but apparently some time ago there was a "land swap" between the State and the nursery (can't remember the nursery name, but I believe Martin Hart may have been involved). I'm under the belief the ownership issue surrounds this swap. It seems the County Assessor's Office either did not have written evidence of the swap, or simply never adjusted their records to reflect the swap. Therefore, the Assessor's Office currently shows the ownership of the parcels as being reversed on their records, possibly rendering the Right-of-Way deeds null and void, e.g., you cannot transfer title to land you do not own. Obviously the City would have certain rights to the Right-of-Way area as both the Grantor and Grantee are in agreement as to what the conveyance is to be. However at a minimum, this will add "color" to the title of the dedicated tracts and render the title as "unclear". . In this case, even though the City has accepted the Right-of-Way and the deeds have been recorded, it places the dedications in "limbo" and renders the Right-of-Way as "questionable" at best. This is not an acceptable situation for the City. This situation needs to be rectified as soon as possible. The best way to put an end to all of this is to have the County deed specialist (whoever Steve Wilson was working with) write a short letter to the City of Wheat Ridge stating that the ownership issue has been cleared up and that the recorded deeds have indeed been accepted by the Assessor's Office. Please let me know if I may be of further assistance in this matter. Sincerely, David F. Brossman, P.L.S. Development Review Engineer CC: Alan White, Director of Community Development Steve Nguyen, Engineering Division Manager Darrel Pennington, Community Planner, Melody Homes, Inc. File •1. cxydvmeat moge Depa,mmt d Vutac Works September 26, 2003 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (303) 235-2868 7500 WEST 29r" AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 FAX (303) 235-2857 Mr. William C. Archdeacon, P.E. Kirkham Michael Consulting Engineers 5600 South Quebec Street, Suite 200D Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111 Re: Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 - Fifth Review of the Grading & Erosion Control Plan, Fourth Review Comments of the Street Construction Plans, Storm Sewer Plans, and Second Review Comments for the Ridge Road Construction Plan and Under-drain Plan. Dear Mr. Archdeacon, have completed the review of the above referenced documents for the Skyline Estates Subdivision received on September 11, 2003, and have the following comments: RIDGE ROAD CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR ALL SHEETS: 1. Provide a P.E. seal and signature. 2. On profile view, all of the changes in grade shown as "PVI - NO VC" need to be shown as a "GRADE BREAK". Sheet 1: 1. Please delete Note 16. Sheet 2: 1. Include the baseline information as redlined. 2. Please correct the spelling for the asphalt planing/overlay area. 3. Correct the Book and Page for the ROW for the Drainage Channel and Detention Facility along the easterly side of Skyline Filing #3. 4. Please change the Reception Number of the 60' ROW from F1738743 to F1738744, for the frontage of Skyline Estates Filing #2 (ROW was dedicated under a different Reception Number than the frontage of Skyline Filing #3). Sheet 3: 1. As the minimum grade at which water will flow on concrete is 0.36%, the minimum allowable (longitudinal) grade for the curb & gutter is 0.40% - 0.50% (and preferably 0.50%, as it is very difficult to construct concrete at a flatter grade than this). Therefore, the curb & gutter profile from the PCR at station 3+35.38 to 8+00 needs to be re-looked at to achieve the minimum allowable grade. At a bare minimum, the profile from 3+35.38 to 5+50 will need to be modified to meet this criterion. If the 0.41 % grade from 5+50 to 8+00 is to be retained in the design, the developer shall be responsible for any "birdbaths" or more of standing water) that may occur during the construction, with the understanding that these areas may need to be removed and replaced at the discretion of the City Inspector prior to approval of the public improvements. 2. Correct the spelling error as shown on the redlined plan. 3. State that vertical curb and gutter is TYPE CG2 (TYP). 4. Add a Note directing the reader to "SEE DETAIL SHEETS 15 AND 16 FOR THE INLET DETAILS". 5. Need to modify the Note directing the reader to Sheet 6, to read "SEE SHEET 7 FOR RAMP AND TYPICAL SECTION DETAILS". 6. Include the County's Reception Number for the existing 5' sidewalk easement shown. 7. Please change the Reception Number of the 60' ROW from F1738743 to F1738744, for the frontage of Skyline Estates Filing #2 (ROW was dedicated under a different Reception Number than the frontage of Skyline Filing #3). Sheet 4: 1. Correct spelling errors as indicated on the redline plans. 2. Show new 6" vertical curb as TYPE CG2 (TYP). 3. Indicate the new 5' detached sidewalk along the frontage of Skyline Estates Filing #2. 4. Identify the ASPHALT PLANING/OVERLAY SECTION. 5. Add a Note directing the reader to "SEE DETAIL SHEETS 15 AND 16 FOR THE INLET DETAILS". 6. Need to modify the Note directing the reader to Sheet 6, to read "SEE SHEET 7 FOR RAMP AND TYPICAL SECTION DETAILS". 7. Clearly identify the drainage easement line as indicated on the redline plans. 8. Please change the Reception Number of the 60' ROW from F1738743 to F1738744, for the frontage of Skyline Estates Filing #2 (ROW was dedicated under a different Reception Number than the frontage of Skyline Filing #3). Sheet 5: 1. Identify the ASPHALT PLANING/OVERLAY SECTION. 2. Add a Note directing the reader to "SEE DETAIL SHEETS 15 AND 16 FOR THE INLET DETAILS". 3. Need to modify the Note directing the reader to Sheet 6, to read "SEE SHEET 7 FOR RAMP AND TYPICAL SECTION DETAILS". Sheet 6: 1. Correct the Book and Page for the ROW for the Drainage Channel and Detention Facility along the easterly side of Skyline Filing #3 (Is it Book 3123 Page 31?). 2. Identify both on the plan view and on the detail the We of riprap to be used. 3. Identify the ASPHALT PLANING/OVERLAY SECTION. Sheet 7: 1. On the MS4 sidewalk detail, change RT to FT as shown on the redline plans. 2. Please include additional details for the ramps at Ridge Road and Nelson Street (matching the Street Construction Plans) as they differ from the current ramp detail shown. The ramps will need to be "pushed back" away from the intersection so as to achieve a minimum of 40" (3.5') from the flowline to the face of the backside curb-head. ADA safety standards require 3-4' of "flat, maneuverable access space" to provide adequate wheelchair access around the ramp area without encroaching onto the drivable roadway surface area. (Please see attached sheet with design considerations). Sheet 8: 1. Please show the following information on the cross-sections provided: a. Lane widths. b. Type of striping, e.g., 4" double yellow, 8" white, etc. c. Define the lane type, e.g., Travel Lane, Center Turn Lane, Bike Lane, etc. Sheets 9-13: 1. No comments for cross-section sheets. Sheet 14: 1. All comments have been addressed for curb return profiles. Sheet 15: 1. All comments have been addressed for the storm sewer plan and profile. Sheet 16: 1. All comments have been addressed for the storm sewer details. STREET CONSTRUCTION PLANS Please provide P.E. seal and signature on all sheets. Sheet 1: 1. Delete Note 16. Sheet 2: 1. Adjust the arrow for the existing storm sewer in 54`" to point to the storm pipe, (show the pipe). 2. Please show the curb & gutter (proposed or existing), and define the 6.5' Tree Lawn Landscape area along the south side of 54`' Avenue. Sheet 6: 1. Please include additional details for the ramps at Ridge Road and Nelson Street (matching the Ridge Road Construction Plans) as they differ from the current ramp details shown. The ramps will need to be "pushed back" away from the intersection so as to achieve a minimum of 40" (3.5') from the flowline to the face of the backside curb-head. ADA safety standards require 34' of "flat, maneuverable access space" to provide adequate wheelchair access around the ramp area without encroaching onto the drivable roadway surface area. (Please see attached sheet with design considerations). 2. On the MS4 sidewalk detail, change RT to FT as shown on the redline plans. Sheet 7: 1. Place the stop sign for the Nelson and Ridge Road intersection at the location required per the Street and Ridge Road Construction Plans. GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 1. All comments have been addressed. The Grading and Erosion Control Plans are hereby approved. STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION PLANS 1. All comments have been addressed. The Storm Sewer Construction Plans are hereby approved. UNDERDRAIN PLAN (Skyline Estates Filing 43 only) 1. All comments have been addressed. The Underdrain Plans are hereby approved. Transportation Planning (Previous Comments) A copy of the Street construction plans has been forwarded to the City's Transportation Planner, Mr. David Menter (303-235-2861) for review and has the following comments: Previous Comments: 1. Ridge Road is an identified streetscape corridor street and is subject to City Council's adopted Streetscape and Architectural Design Manual requirements. A copy of the Manual is available through the Planning Department for $10.00. 2. The Developer will need to sign a "Streetscape Maintenance Agreement" prior to Certificate of Occupancy. 3. In the treelawn, the developer shall install: Irrigation system Turf (or other approved ground cover - see Streetscape Manual). Street trees @35' - 40' spacing; 3" caliper (see Streetscape Manual for approved varieties). The Public Works Department requires 2 signed and sealed copies of the complete Traffic Impact Study, Street Construction Plans, and Ridge Road Construction Plans. Please provide these with the next submittal Subdivision Improvement Agreement Upon City Council approval of the Final Plat, a Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) will need be executed by the project owner/developer. The City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Department will provide the SIA to the project owner/developer. Please note that there may be additions to this document for this development. Application for Minor Dumping/Landfill Permit Prior to the commencement of any onsite grading, an Application for Dumping/Landfill Permit, along with the fees due will need to be submitted for review and approval. This Permit is generally issued at the time of the Building Permit. Public Improvements Cost Estimate & Guarantee Prior to any construction commencing for the required public improvements within the right-of-way, an itemized engineer's cost estimate will need to be submitted for review and approval. Upon acceptance of this estimate, a letter of credit reflecting total costs of the approved cost estimate plus 25% will need to be submitted by the owner/developer for review and approval. Right-of-Way Construction Permit(s)/Licensing Prior to any construction of the public improvements, the necessary Right-of-Way construction permit(s) and respective licensing will need to be submitted for processing by the City. Right-of-Way Construction Permits are issued only after approval of all required technical documents, including but not limited to, the Final Drainage Report & Plan, Final Plat, Final Development Plan, Traffic Impact Study, Storm Sewer Plans, Street Construction Plans, Grading & Erosion Control Plan, and easement or ROW dedications. 2-Year Warranty Period for Public Improvements Upon completion of all public improvements and acceptance by the City Inspector, the original Letter of Credit shall be surrendered. At this time a 2-year warranty period for the public improvements shall commence. If at any time during said 2-year Warranty Period the City Inspector deems that the constructed public improvements are in such condition as to require repairs or replacement, the Developer shall complete such work upon request. Upon commencement of the 2-year Warranty Period, a 2"d Letter of Credit in the amount of 25% of the original itemized engineer's cost estimate shall be submitted to the City of Wheat Ridge and be dated as to expire on the 2-year anniversary of the Warranty Period commencement date. The City shall retain said Letter of Credit for the entire 2-year Warranty Period. Upon completion of the 2-year Warranty Period, the 2"d Letter of Credit shall be surrendered by the City of Wheat Ridge. F gned acceptance letter from the ditch company will be required prior to the issuance of any ding permits. Please return all redlined prints with the fourth submittal. If you have any questions, please contact me at 303-235-2864. Sincerely, David F. Brossman, P.L.S. Development Review Engineer Cc: Alan White, Director of Community Development Steven Nguyen, P.E., Engineering Manager Jonathan P. Reynolds, P.E., Projects Supervisor Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner Travis Crane, Planner Darin Morgan, Code Administrator File(3) skyline_revicM (CivilPlans).W 7500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Wheat Telephone 303/235-2846 Ridge FAX 303/235-2857 September 17, 2003 Darrel Pennington Melody Homes 11031 Sheridan Blvd. Westminster, CO 80020 Dear Mr. Pennington: At its meeting of September 8, 2003, City Council approved Case No. WZ-02-13, a request for approval of a zone change from A-1, Agricultural-One, to PRD, Planned Residential Development and PID, Planned Industrial Development, and approval of an outline development plan for property located at 10285 Ridge Road, for the following reasons: 1. The requirements of the City's Planned Development Regulations have been met. 2. The rezoning will not adversely impact the public health, safety or welfare. 3. The zone change is compatible with the surrounding area and the adjacent zoning of residential to the north and west as well as the adjacent zoning of industrial to the south and west. 4. A change in character of the area has occurred due to the zone changes on adjoining property to the north and west. 5. There are physical benefits to be derived from the construction of public improvements and a tree lawn along Ridge Road 6. Adequate infrastructure will be constructed with the development to serve the proposed use. With the following condition: 1. The residential zoning shall be subject to the City's parkland fee in lieu of land dedication at the time of final plat. Enclosed is a copy of the ordinance and a draft copy of the minutes stating the Council's decision. A blackline photographic mylar of the outline development plan needs to be submitted for recording with Jefferson County within 60 days of final action. The fees for recording with Jefferson County are $11 per page. Enclosed is a copy of our fee schedule. Please submit payment along with the mylar. Darrel Pennington Page 2 September 17, 2003 The final development plan portion of Case No. WZ-02-13 and Case No. WS-02-01 are scheduled for a public hearing before Planning Commission on September 18, 2002, and tentatively scheduled for a public hearing before City Council on October 27, 2003. Publication/public notice fees in the amount of $300 are due upon receipt. In my letter July 14, you received a credit of $100 that may be applied to the publishing and recording fees that were mentioned above. Please feel free to contact me at 303-235-2846 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Kathy F~i Administrative Asst. Enclosure: Draft of Minutes Copy of Ordinance cc: Richard Schierburg 1580 Lincoln St. Ste. 770 Denver, CO 80203 WZ-02-13 (case file) c:\...\My Documents\ttathy\PCRPTSTLANGCOM\CORRESP\2003\WZ0213 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: September 8, 2003 Page -4- PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ORDINANCES ON SECOND READING - Item 1. COUNCIL BILL- 34-2003-AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE FROM AGRICULTURAL-ONE TO PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 10285 RIDGE ROAD, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. (Case No. WZ-02-13) (Melody Homes, Inc.) VOIRAFT Council Bill 34-2003 was introduced on second reading by Mrs. Rotola, who also read the title and summary; Clerk assigned Ordinance No. 1307. Mary Austin, Community Development Department, was sworn in by the Mayor and presented the staff report. She showed slides of the site. Planning Commission recommended approval with 5 conditions as indicated in the Agenda Packet; the applicant has agreed to these conditions and has already made the appropriate modifications, so the changes have been made on the document Council has received. She asked Council to add a condition that the residential zoning shall be subject to the City's parkland fee in lieu of land dedication. Darrell Pennington, with Melody Homes, was sworn in by the Mayor. He praised Wheat Ridge's staff and their help and cooperation. He stated that his company wants to put a quality development in this area. Matthew Hickey, representing inland Paper Board & Packaging, was sworn in by the Mayor. They are the neighbor to the south. They have operated their facility since 1971. They currently employ 106 full time employees at the facility and have always been a good neighbor and supporter of the City of Wheat Ridge and the community. They are capable of operating 3 full-time shifts 24 hours a day and have historically done so. They have no intention of changing that. They support the findings of the Planning Commission. They are concerned that one day homeowners will object to their operation, which generates noise and lighting. They suggested that Melody Homes disclose to future owners that their company operates 365 days a year. Barbara Munson was sworn in by the Mayor. She is concerned what the "Industrial" means. She is a Skyline Homeowner and once all the trees came down, they could hear the noise from the bottle plant. Their concern is just what this Industrial Lot in the new development is supposed to be and what will they do for a noise barrier. Mary Austin stated that the Permitted Uses are listed on Page 2 of the plan, which is in the Agenda Packet. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: September 8, 2003 Page -5- Teri Dalbec was sworn in by the Mayor. She had understood that this was going to be Planned Residential and Planned Industrial. She feels she has been highly fooled by what has just been read by Mary Austin. She thinks all of the public has. This hearing should be postponed until people who live in that area have been alerted as to what is actually being done. Mr. Pennington stated for the record that noise issues are disclosed with the closing documents that are recorded with the home, so they are on notice that these issues do exist. Motion by Mrs. Rotola to approve Council Bill 34-2003 (Ordinance 1307), Case No. WZ- 02-13, a request for a rezoning of property located at 10285 Ridge Road from Agricultural-One to Planned Residential Development and Planned Industrial Development and I further move to approve the Outline Development Plan, and that this action take effect 15 days after final publication for the following reasons: 1. The requirements of the City's Planned Development regulations have been met. 2. The rezoning will not adversely impact the public health, safety, or welfare. 3. The zone change is compatible with the surrounding area and the adjacent zoning of residential to the north and west as well as the adjacent zoning of industrial to the south and west. 4. A change in character of the area has occurred due to the zone changes on adjoining property to the north and west. 5. There are physical benefits to be derived from the construction of public improvements and a tree lawn along Ridge Road. 6. Adequate infrastructure will be constructed with the development to serve the proposed use. With the following condition: The residential zoning shall be subject to the City's parkland fee in lieu of land dedication at the time of final plat. Seconded by Mr. Gokey; carried 8-0. Item 2. PUBLIC HEARING on an amendment to the Youngfield Plaza Phase II Final Development Plan, located at 4120 Youngfield Street. (Case No. WZ-03-06) (Casey's Recreational Vehicle Sales) David Schneider introduced. Item 2 and read the title and summary. Travis Crane, Community Development, was sworn in by the Mayor and presented the staff report and showed slides. The applicant is requesting an amendment to increase the building square footage to about 3700 square feet, that is an increase of about 1100 square feet. He is also requesting to raise the freestanding sign to a height of 35 feet and increase the sign size to 121 square feet. No neighborhood meeting was required or held. INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER Rotola Council Bill No. 34-2003 Ordinance No. 1307 Series of 2003 TITLE: AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE FROM AGRICULTURAL-ONE TO PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 10285 RIDGE ROAD, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1. Upon application by Melody Homes, Inc, approval of a zone change in Wheat Ridge, Colorado, Case No. WZ-02-13, and based on recommendation of approval from the Wheat Ridge Planning Commission and pursuant to findings made based on testimony and evidence presented at a public hearing before the Wheat Ridge City Council, Wheat Ridge maps are hereby amended to exclude from the Agricultural-One District and to include in the Planned Residential Development District and the Planned Industrial Development District the following described land: ALL THAT PART OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO, LYING NORTH OF THE COUNTY ROAD KNOWN AS RIDGE ROAD, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST 114 OF SAID SECTION 16 THENCE NORTH 00° 13'11" WEST, ON AND ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4, A DISTANCE OF 71.25 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF RIDGE ROAD, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 00°13'11 " WEST ON AND ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST 9., A DISTANCE OF 1246.20 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4; THENCE NORTH 89°35'34" EAST, ON AND ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, A DISTANCE OF 665.06 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4; THENCE SOUTH 00°12'59" EAST, ON AND ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, A DISTANCE OF 1068.47 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID RIDGE ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 74°38'30" WEST, ON AND ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 688.90 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Section 2. Vested Property Rights. Approval of this zone change does not create a vested property right. Vested property rights may only arise and accrue pursuant to the provisions of Section 26-121 of the Code of Laws of the City of Wheat Ridge. Section 3. Safety Clause. The City Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is promulgated under the general police power of the City of Wheat Ridge, that it is promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare of the public and that this ordinance is necessary for the preservation of health and safety and for the protection of public convenience and welfare. The City Council further determines that the ordinance bears a rational relation to the proper legislative object sought to be attained. Section 4. Severability. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, or part of this Zoning Code or the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall for any reason be adjusted by a court of competent jurisdiction invalid, such judgment shall not affect application to other persons or circumstances. Section 5. Supersession Clause. If any provision, requirement or standard established by this Ordinance is found to conflict with similar provisions, requirements or standards found elsewhere in the Code of Laws of the City of Wheat Ridge, which are in existence as of the date of adoption of this Ordinance, the provisions, requirements and standards herein shall supersede and prevail. Section 6. This ordinance shall take effect 15 days after final publication. INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first reading by a vote of 8 to 0 on this 11thday of August 2003, ordered published in full in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Wheat Ridge and Public Hearing and consideration on final passage set for September 8 , 2003, at 7:00 o'clock p.m., in the Council Chambers, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado.. READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final reading by a vote of 8 to 0 this 8th day of September 2003 SIGNED by the Mayor on this 9th day of VENY,MAYOR O~ ATTEST: ~i U S Wanda Sang, City Cler } ?V1 fn 1c AS TO FORM BY CITY ATTORNEY CITY A' 1st Publication: August 14, 2003 2nd Publication: September 11, 2003 Wheat Ridge Transcript Effective Date: September 26, 2003 FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT FOR SKYLINE ESTATES, FILING NO. 3 Prepared For: MELODYHOMES,N. 11031 Sheridan Blvd. Westminster, Colorado 80020 303-466-1831 Contact: Darrel Pennington Prepared By: KIRKHAM W MICHAEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS CITY O WHEAT RIDGE PUBLICWORKS, ENGINEERING APPROVE FOR: /DRAINAGE ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ CURB & GUTTER ❑ STREET ❑ MISCELLANEOUS ❑ PLAT COMMENT CIVIL ENGINEER DATE SUBJECT TO FIELD INSPECTIONS 5600 South Quebec Street, Suite 200D Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111 303-694-2300 Contact: William Curtis Archdeacon PE, PLS KM JOB No. M-0203120 October 2002 Revised March 2003 Revised July 2003 Revised July 2003 U, t`x j E Fm Revised August 2003 6 > Fs V"""D TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION SITE LOCATION' SITE DESCRIPTION PROPOSED PROJECT DESCRIPTION--------------------------------------------------------------------- FLOOD HAZARD AND RELEVANT DRAINAGE STUDIES---------------------------------------------- HISTORIC DRAINAGE SYSTEM,.... MAJOR BASIN, SUB-BASIN AND SITE DRAINAGE 1 1 ---.......1 ......---1 PROPOSED DRAINAGE SYSTEM .......................................................................................3 DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA ---------------....------..-..3 RUNOFF . °-4 4 DETENTION STREETS --------...----°°-----------5 OPEN CHANNEL FLOW STORM SEWER SYSTEMS -...--......-......-------....--6 COLUMBINE BASIN . . ....................-..--......6 - RIDGE ROAD----°--.... 0 -.....1 O UCHEM-RENO IRRIGATION DITCH J UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM 11 CONCLUSIONS .........................................................................................................................11 IMPACT OF IMPROVEMENT 11 COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS......................................... ° REFERENCES ...........................................................................................................................12 TABLE OF APPENDICES ......................................................................................................13 KM-Job #0203120 Melody Homes October 2002 Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 Final Drainage Report Page n ass INTRODUCTION SITE LOCATION The 17.67-acre site is in the City of Wheat Ridge, located in the west half of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 16, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado. It is bounded to the north by West 54th Avenue (City of Arvada), to the south by Ridge Road, to the west by the planned Skyline Estates Filing No. 2 (City of Arvada), and to the east by primarily vacant land owned by the State of Colorado. A vicinity map is included in Appendix A. SITE DESCRIPTION The existing drainage pattern for the site generally runs from the northwest corner to the southeast corner of the site via overland flow. The existing grade for the site is relatively flat with grades ranging from 0.7% to 2.0%. The Reno-Juchem irrigation ditch exists through the center of the site flowing from west to east. There is an existing detention basin located the northeast corner of the site and an outfall channel along the eastern portion of the site that were constructed with Skyline Estates Filing No. 1. The site is currently covered with native grasses. According to the Soil Survey of Golden Area, Colorado prepared by the Soil Conservation Service, 1980, the site is primarily Nunn soil, hydrologic group C. A copy of the soil map and data from the report is included in Appendix K. PLANNED PROJECT DESCRIPTION Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 is a planned project of 37 residential lots and one commercial/industrial lot on 17.67 acres. Street gutter flow, storm sewer systems, and two detention ponds will control the drainage on the property. FLOOD HAZARD AND RELEVANT DRAINAGE STUDIES According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Community Panel No. 085079 0005 C, last revised February 4, 1988, this site is located within Zone C, an area of minimal flooding. This site is not located Melody Homes KM-Job #0203120 Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 October 2002 Final Drainage Report Page 1 within a 100-year flood zone as defined by FEMA. A copy of this map is included in Appendix K. The Outfall Systems Planning Columbine Basin (OSPCB) prepared by the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD) in 1994 shows a proposed open channel along the Ridge Road frontage of the site. This Columbine Basin Channel (CBC) is a part of the Ridge Road Tributary as delineated in the OSPCB. A 35-foot drainage easement will be dedicated along the Ridge Road right-of-way to facilitate construction of this CBC as a part of the overall development of the site. Excerpts from the OSPCB have been included in Appendix I. Design calculations involving the CBC have also been included in Appendix I. HISTORIC DRAINAGE SYSTEM MAJOR DRAINAGE BASIN The existing drainage pattern for the 77.6-acre major drainage basin generally runs from the northwest to the southeast of the site via overland flow. Portions of the major drainage basin have been developed as Skyline Estates Filing No. 1 and others are being developed a Skyline Estates Filing No. 2. The major drainage basin flows are collected within a roadside drainage swale located along the north side of Ridge Road. These flows exit the major drainage basin and continue in this roadside drainage swale east to Miller Street and an existing storm sewer system. SUB-BASIN AND SITE DRAINAGE The existing drainage pattern for the site generally runs from the northwest comer to the southeast corner of the site via overland flow. Drainage through the site also contains offsite flows from the planned Skyline Estates Filing No. 2. A portion of this offsite flow is sheet flow, while the remaining portion is concentrated in an outfall pipe from Skyline Estates Filing No. 2. The Reno-Juchem irrigation ditch exists through the center of the site flowing from west to east. There is an existing detention basin located the northeast corner of the site and an outfall channel along the eastern portion of the site that were constructed with Skyline Estates Filing No. 1. The site flows are collected within a drainage swale located along the north side of Ridge Road. These flows exit the site and continue in this roadside drainage swale east to Miller Street and an existing storm sewer system. Melody Homes KM-Job #0203120 Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 October 2002 Final Drainage Report Page 2 NN During the minor storm events, the northern portion of the site drains into the Reno- Juchem irrigation ditch. The southern portion of the site drains to Ridge Road. During the 100-year storm, Kirkham Michael (KM) used a worst-case scenario that the Reno- Juchem irrigation ditch will be full, forcing the runoff from the entire site to drain to Ridge Road. The Historic Drainage Plans for the minor and 100-year storm events are located in Appendix K. PROPOSED DRAINAGE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA Design Standards utilized are those currently enforced by the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado and UDFCD. The minor design storm event is the 5-year storm and the major design storm event is the 100-year storm. As the site is less than 160 acres, the rational method was used for calculation of runoff. Including the offsite flows that directly contribute to the site drainage, the total basin size for the site is 19.25 acres. The total basin has been divided into 19 sub-basins ranging in size from 0.15 acres to 2.61 acres. The table below details these sub-basins. The drainage map for the proposed development is located in Appendix K. Sub-basin Area Flows to 1 A 1.67 Pond G 2 B 1.06 Pond G 3 C 2.08 Pond H 4 D 2.61 Pond H 5 E 1.15 Pond H 6 F 1.28 Pond G 7 G 0.36 Pond G 8 H 0.57 Pond H 9 I 1.40 Pond H 10 J 0.85 Columbine Channel (un-detained) 11 K 0.23 Columbine Channel (un-detained) 12 L 1.82 Columbine Channel (partially un-detained) 13 M 105 Columbine Channel (undetained) 14 N 0.80 Columbine Channel (un-detained) 15 O 0.20 Columbine Channel (un-detained) Melody Homes KM-Job #0203120 Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 October 2002 Final Drainage Report Page 3 16 OS-1 0.52 Pond H 17 OS-2 0.23 Pond H 18 OS-3 0.22 Skyline Estates Filing 1 Detention Pond 19 RR 0.15 Columbine Channel (un-detained) Totals 19.25 RUNOFF Five of the 19 sub-basins (J, K, N, O, and RR) flow off-site, without detention. These are the Ridge Road and Columbine Channel sub-basins. Sub-basin L contains the Skyline Estates Filing No. I detention basin and therefore only the downstream portion flows off- site without detention. Sub-basin OS-3 contributes to the Skyline Estates Filing No. 1 detention basin and sub-basin L. Sub-basin M, rear yard drainage, flows directly into the downstream portion of Sub-basin L. Nine on-site and two off-site sub-basins contribute to the Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 detention ponds. The runoff will travel via overland flow, gutter flow, and storm sewer systems to the two detention ponds located in the southeast comer of the site. These flows exit the site in the Ridge Road roadside drainage system (part of which is the Columbine Channel) and continue east to Miller Street and an existing storm sewer system. The development of Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 will have little effect on the adjacent downstream properties. The majority of the runoff (78%) flows through a detention pond system. Eleven percent of the remaining runoff is rear yard flow from Sub-basin M that flows into sub-basin L. The existing drainage ditch in sub-basin L will remain in its natural condition and does have capacity to the major storm runoff. The remaining 11% runoff is along the CBC and Ridge Road. Runoff from the future industrial lot has been included in the design of the western detention pond and further detention for the industrial site as it develops will not be necessary. Calculations for the existing ditch are located in Appendix H. The flow rates for the various sub-basins range from 0.15 CFS to 5.04 CFS for the minor storm and flow rates for the major storm range from 0.95 CFS to 10.79 CFS. The runoff calculations are located in Appendix B. DETENTION Detention for the residential and industrial portion of the site has been designed with two ponds, both located in the southeastern comer of the property. The ponds have been Melody Homes KM-Job #0203120 Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 October 2002 Final Drainage Report Page 4 designed to capture water quality volumes, as well as the major and minor storm events. The following chart summarizes the volumes and release rates for these ponds: Pond 5-year volume 100-year volume Pond G (eastern) 0.21 acre-feet 0.41 acre-feet Pond H (western) 0.40 acre-feet 0.76 acre-feet Pond 5-year 5-year 100-year 100-year historic developed historic developed flow rate release rate ow rate release rate Pond G (eastern) 5.4 CFS 0.91 CFS 19.8 CFS 5.10 CFS Pond H (western) 12.3 CFS 1.00 CFS 35.5 CFS 6.02 CFS The flows that exit the detention basin flow into the roadside drainage system for Ridge Road. Flow rates exiting the site are extremely less than the historical flows developed both during the minor and major storm events. Calculations for the ponds and the outlet structures are located in Appendix F. STREETS Haested Methods Flowmaster ® program was used to determine the capacity of the streets to carry the storm flows. The streets have been designed with a 28' width from flowline to flowline and rollover curb. The maximum allowable depth of flow for the streets is to the top of the curb, four inches above the flowline of the street. The streets slope with an average slope of approximately 1%, with one area of 4% slope in the northeastern corner. The inlets for the storm sewer system have been placed to prevent curb overtopping. The Flowmaster® output for street capacity is located in Appendix C. OPEN CHANNEL FLOW The existing channel along the eastern border of the property is currently designed to for the outflow from the existing Skyline Estates Filing No. 1 detention pond located in the northeast corner of the site. The rear-lot drainage (sub-basin M) along the eastern edge of the site will also drain into the channel. The southern portion of the existing channel will be modified as it connects to the CBC along the northern edge of Ridge Road. Melody Homes KM-Jab #0203120 Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 October 2002 Final Drainage Report Page 5 NN The Skyline Estates Homeowner's Association will maintain all channels. The Skyline Estates Homeowner's Association will maintain the open channels adjacent to the industrial site until the future property owners can provide maintenance. All open channels affecting the property have been designed with a relatively flat slope to prevent scouring and high velocities. The maximum slope of any open channel is 0.6%. With the exception of the CBC, all open channels have been designed as grass-lined channels. The CBC has been designed with an UDFCD concrete trickle channel. Calculations for the runoff to the existing channel are located in Appendix H. Calculations involving the design of the open channel for the CBC have been included in Appendix I. Additional detail relating to the design of the CBC is located under the sub- section "Columbine Basin" STORM SEWER SYSTEMS The on-site storm sewer system is divided into two distinct components and was designed using the Haested Methods StormCAD 0. The storm sewers were designed to carry the minor storm event within the pipe and inlets were placed to facilitate no curb overtopping. Both on-site sewers outfall into the detention ponds. The StormCAD 0 output is located in Appendix D. COLUMBINE BASIN Outfall Systems Planning Columbine Basin (OSPCB) prepared by the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD) in 1994 shows a proposed open channel along the Ridge Road frontage of the site. This Columbine Basin Channel (CBC) is a part of the Ridge Road Tributary as delineated in the OSPCB. A 35-foot easement will be dedicated along the Ridge Road right-of-way to facilitate construction of this CBC as a part of the overall development of the site. Prior to commencing with the inclusion of the OSPCB into the Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 Final Drainage Report, KM met with the Chief of Floodplain Management, Bill DeGroot, of UDFCD on Monday June 16, 2003. It was noted during that meeting that the OSPCB drainage basins 23 and 24 were no longer reflective of the current development. Mr. DeGroot indicated that KM should utilize the current development Melody Homes KM-Job #0203120 Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 October 2002 Final Drainage Report Page 6 scenario along with sufficient back up to show the differences between current conditions and those present when the OSPCB was developed. The following table summarizes these differences: Basin OSPCB Actual OSPCB Actual OSPCB ctual Area Area 5-year 5-year 5-year 0-year ] : : flow flow flow flow (undetained) ndetajned ) (u 23 57.6 37.3 66 CFS 55 CFS 189 CFS 153 CFS 24 57.6 40.3 91 CFS 42 CFS 226 CFS 140 CFS Combined 115.2 77.6 127 CFS 97 CFS 360 CFS 293 CFS Basin OSPCB Actual OSPCB Actual 5-year 100-year 5-year 100-year flow flow flow flow (detained) (detained) 23 66 CFS 29 CFS 189 CFS 90 CFS 24 91 CFS 12 CFS 226 CFS 65 CFS Combined 127 CFS 41 CFS 360 CFS 155 CFS The actual area is only 67.4% of the OSPCB report. The actual undetained flows are 76.4% (5-year event) and 81.4% (100-year event) of the OSPCB report. The detained flows are 32.3% (5-year event) and 43.1% (100-year event) of the OSPCB report. Essentially this means that the release rate is approximately 50% of the current historical flows. The OSPCB calls for a typical channel section for the Ridge Home Tributary to be a grass-lined channel with a 4-foot flat bottom, 4:1 side slopes, and a 24" RCP low flow conveyance system. During a follow-up telephone conversation with Mr. DeGroot, Kirkham Michael proposed the low flow conveyance concept of a standard UDFCD concrete trickle channel in lieu of the 24" RCP. The reasoning for this twofold. First, was that due to current downstream constraints a 24" RCP was not practical and second, maintenance issues would be greatly enhanced with the concrete trickle channel. Mr. DeGroot indicated that a standard UDFCD concrete trickle channel would be acceptable as long as the requisite capacity was available. Calculations indicating a 4-foot wide, 9- inch deep concrete trickle channel is adequate are located in Appendix I. The intent of the development of Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 is to provide for the development of the Ridge Home Tributary of the OSPCB of that portion located within the confines of Skyline Estates Filing No. 3. As such, there is a transitional channel Melody Homes KM-Job 110203120 Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 October2002 Final Drainage Report Page 7 NN section from the east line of Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 to the inlet at Miller Street. The flow rate at the Miller Street inlet is, after development, substantially the same as current historical flows for both the minor and major storms. This is achieved through the four detention basins constructed with the development of Skyline Estates Filings Nos. 1, 2, and 3. The following charts indicate the flow rate conditions for pre and post development conditions at the Miller Street inlet. A schematic detailing these areas is located in Appendix I. Minor Storm Event (5 Year) Pre-Development Post Development Basin ID (Historical) Basin ID Flow Rates Flow Rates Actual Areas Actual Areas EX 1 and SE2 14.5 CFS EX 1 and SE2 14.5 CFS EX 4 6.9 CFS EX 4 6.9 CFS EX 2.1 Into Juchem-Reno SE 3 Included with SE 3 Ditch Detained Outfall Detained Outfall EX 2 4.4 CFS EX 2 SE 3 1.9 CFS Detained Outfall EX 2 Included with EX 2 Sub-basins 2.9 CFS J, K, and N EX 3 9.1 CFS Sub-basins 12.5 CFS L and M Total 34.9 CFS Total 38.7 CFS Melody Homes KM-Job #0203120 Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 October 2002 Final Drainage Report Page 8 Major Storm Event (100 Year) Pre-Development Post Development Basin ID (Historical) Basin ID Flow Rates Flow Rates Actual Areas Actual Areas EX 1 and SE2 74.6 CFS EX 1 and SE2 74.6 CFS EX 4 28.3 CFS EX 4 28.3 CFS EX 2.1 Included with EX 2 SE 3 Included with SE 3 Detained Outfall Detained Outfall EX 2 35.1 CFS EX 2 SE 3 11.1 CFS Detained Outfall EX 2 Included with EX 2 Sub-basins 8.6 CFS J, K, and N EX 3 54.9 CFS Sub-basins 65.9 CFS Land M Total 192.9 CFS Total 188.5 CFS The post development minor storm event flow rate is 10.9% greater than the pre- development conditions, but the post development major storm flow rate with detention is 97.7% of pre-development conditions. The flows shown utilize the detained release rates where applicable. Over-topping of Miller Street caused by an inadequate existing downstream storm drainage system at the Miller Street / Ridge Road intersection currently exists north of Ridge Road. There is 2,780 CF of surface storage at the Miller Street inlet before the flow overtops Miller Street. Once this storm water overtops Miller Street it will flow eastwardly along the north side of Ridge Road. The existing pipe from the Miller Street inlet is 20.6 CFS. Utilizing the triangular hydrographs as shown in Appendix I, the amount of overflow can be approximated. For the minor storm the existing overtopping amounts to 46,117 CF while the post development conditions show the overtopping to be 42,823 CF, a decrease of 7.1 For the major storm the existing overtopping amounts to 1,299,043 CF while the post development conditions show the overtopping to be 853,501 CF, a decrease of 34.3 These post development storms can be categorized as more intense and shorter duration storms with longer runoff of incidental water, that is; flow rates less than capacity of outfall system. The development of this project will not significantly exacerbate the current situation, but will in general improve the overtopping. A schematic showing this overtopping situation along with calculations are located in Appendix I. Melody Homes KM-Job #0203120 Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 October 2002 Final Drainage Report Page 9 1U Excerpts from the Columbine Basin Study as well as calculations for the design of the channel are located in Appendix I. RIDGE ROAD Ridge Road is currently a two-lane asphalt road with side ditches. The northern half of Ridge Road will be improved with an additional lane, curb and gutter, and a typical roadway drainage system and will be constructed with Skyline Estates Filing No. 3. The design for Ridge Road has been based on the centerline of the existing pavement. The northern half of the proposed road will slope downward to the new curb and gutter section. The drainage basins for the northern half of the road extend from the west side of Skyline Estates Filing No. 2 to the east side of Skyline Estates Filing No. 3. The basins are based on the portion of Ridge Road to be constructed at this time. The proposed design for the northern flowline of Ridge Road has two sump locations. Inlets have been designed for these locations. The inlets outfall into the channel in Skyline Estates Filing No. 2 and the CBC channel in Skyline Estates Filing No. 3. The runoff calculations for Ridge Road, both from Skyline Estates Filings Nos. 2 and 3 have been included with the runoff calculations for the proposed development and are located in Appendix B. A drainage map for the Ridge Road sub-basins is located in Appendix K. Street capacity, inlet capacity, and pipe sizing calculations for Ridge Road are located in Appendix J. JUGHEM-RENO IRRIGATION DITOH The Reno-Juchem irrigation ditch exists through the center of the site flowing from west to east. The proposed design is for an irrigation pipeline to be constructed in lieu of the existing irrigation ditch to transport the flow from the west side of the property to outfall in the existing ditch on the east side, just past the residential lots. The inverts and slope of the proposed pipeline are established by the existing elevation of the ditch. The Consolidated Juchem Ditch and Reservoir Company has provided final approval for the proposed design. The existing irrigation ditch currently crosses the drainage Swale from the existing Skyline Estates Filing No. 1 detention pond along the eastern border of the property. There is no change being considered for the current condition of the crossing. Melody Homes KM-Job #0203120 Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 October 2002 Final Drainage Report Page 10 a UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM The underdrain system is designed to collect the minor subsurface groundwater flow from the area around the building foundations. Underneath the pavement of the fronting street, Melody Homes, Inc. will install a 6" PVC pipe system with standard storm sewer system manholes and 4" PVC lateral service connections to each building lot. At the time of building construction these lateral service connections are extended by the builder and connected to the foundation drain of the building. The underdrain system is not connected directly to the surface stormwater drainage system of Skyline Estates Filing No. 3. This is mainly due to an elevation differential that does not allow for direct connection to the surface stormwater drainage system. The underdrain system within the subdivision is connected at Ridge Road and Nelson Street to a similar underdrain system constructed with Skyline Estates Filing No. 2 that eventually outfalls into the storm inlet located at Ridge Road and Miller Street. In essence this underdrain system functions as a gravity-flow system and operates similarly to a surface stormwater drainage system. A copy of the underdrain plan is located in Appendix K. CONCLUSIONS IMPACT OF DEVELOPMENT The Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 stormwater management system as discussed herein maintains runoff patterns and flow rates that are consistent with historical pre-developed conditions. The system as designed will convey, release, and enhance the quality of the storm-generated runoff up to, and including, the 100-year storm event, in a safe manner consistent with approved local standards. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS The Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 stormwater management system as discussed herein is in compliance with the standards currently enforced by the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado and UDFCD. Melody Homes KM-Job #0203120 Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 October 2002 Final Drainage Report Page 11 12N REFERENCES 1. Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual, June 2001. 2. City of Wheat Ridge Public Works Department, Development Review Information Packet for Commercial and Residential Public Improvements, December 1998. 3. FEMA FIRM, City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado, Jefferson County, Community Panel Number 085079 0005 C, Revised Feb. 4, 1988. 4. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey of Golden Area, Colorado, 1980 5. Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, Outfall System Planning Columbine Basin, 1994. Melody Homes KM-Job #0203120 Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 October 2002 Final Drainage Report Page 12 NN TABLE OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A: VICINITY MAP APPENDIX B: HYDROLOGY APPENDIX C: STREET CAPACITY APPENDIX D: STORM SEWER SYSTEM APPENDIX E: INLET CAPACITY APPENDIX F: RIPRAP APPENDIX G: DETENTION PONDS APPENDIX H: CULVERT AND SWALE DESIGN APPENDIX I: COLUMBINE BASIN APPENDIX J: RIDGE ROAD APPENDIX K: RELATED MAPS Melody Homes KM-Job #0203120 Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 October 2002 Final Drainage Report Page 11 APPENDIX A VICINITY MAP Melody Homes KM-Job #020312 Skyline Estates III October-2002 Final Drainage Report Appendix VICINITY MAP N N.T.S. i 1 ~ l t+&~,~ yw~3l.~ 7~7M9fIG tR _ .F ~ ti 3 PROJECT 1 ~ t SITE . i a+4 s r a.r q7 t ~ ~ ° h ~ ~ gy f 9 j t 4 1 f' APPENDIX B HYDROLOGY Melody Homes KM-Job #020312 Skyline Estates III October2002 Final Drainage Report Appendix °o N ro N Z O N O v p LL N M Z z O w LL U 0 Z N Y RO Q U LL QO W W ~ Z ~g UU W J NU N Y Q W C J 2 C N N T N n OI Z~ ~ M M M N P ~ P LL O # °y C ' P N OI y ~ E n vi m Z J N U m ~ W = w J 2 p O O O O U N Q~ 0 in M o 0 ~ Z ~ Q F y r ~ ° 05 r c ° m ~ W ~ M n m K J J a E U n ~ o M n o m ~ M ~ N Q N p f Z v n n J N o o O ~ w a J LL W N N ° o oe O w J O O O O ~ N H J f O O O O V Z ~ Oj O O N LL6 " j P Q f M (O O N O N Z Q J W _ w~ p O O O O O O O O ~ W O~ J~ y O O O O O O O O Z (7 r o LL ° M ° N W N N P r J Q ~ y ~ ~ N b N N ~ N p U o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u U ~ o rv °i ° ° m `D as o ~ v i M m ~ m m ~ z _ m ~ N M d N M a G1 N X X X X N X N X X ~ 0 w w w w w W w w N Z < N c0 m <O T ~ M oP .n c O C w ' P N m j E I ['J M c) h O f J t ~ O O O o 0 Q x O N M l n O Z O c J O N ~ O M J LL 0 U M N O f M m m W~ M M o io o < N ~o C U Z P N r ~ ~ o J N N N O LL O O W m o oe J O O O N ~ O O Z O ~ J _ Z ~ ~ M w n ~o o `O b °a o T m a W LL o M N N Q N 0 e J'-' O O O O O O O O O O O O N f O N O O O O O O Z LL O m N n P N J v tO C l ~O N O ~j o ~O 0 (O N 0 a U m N rv o ~ Z yj J( X JC X W W W ~ W W W W N z° N y 0 o 1 H o ~ 2 E 0 n o c Z ~ o+ 0 'o °a`o LL a) 0 O LL 0 a h Z.(~ W m w~ ow w U a y O W = z w a~ 0 J z m O~ 0 O a n U Y m 2i a m a a N D N N - ~ N U ~ U N Y K Q S W C (u!w) 44 w w I$tl4) q!JOlap (14) y;6ua~ (w) az!s adld w m adolS E L (SID) Mold u61Sap (SID) W M013 W w adol olS (540) b LL p J4/u! z ! (ov)(v.o) F wns Mw) Jl y LL (SID) U D u? r d m 'y m v a m o m m II v 0 W J4N! ! 0 N 0 u7 0 m 0 V ~ ~ o N 0 n 0 M 0 <p t'] 1'J t7 c'J w V N M ~ f ) w V.o u> r~ N J O N O O O O l yf K N N O V (ulw) °v °n °m om p r° m rn , of ci p m N o V h rn V ~ a 44000 r r r r r ry young o 6 6 o z N o N 0 0 0 N O N N J LL m m m C egiv easy ~ N <.i m W r~ m julod u6!sad N " v u' m r m i w d N t'J V Z ~ N N L W W W W W w W [ A n a V M U W N U ~ N M co + II E " N N m E5 E T O ~n N `o C c ~ E o m o c D ~ C a° ti N Y w K (u!w) g (sd;) A10010A Cu) y;6ua~ (u!) az!s adld adolS (SID) -OH u6!sad (SID) Mol j adolS (SID) O Jy/u! I (otl) N.o) wnS (ulw) Jl n U 0 V ~ (D ~ O N ~ r N n m m~ N II 1 W J4N! 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 ! u) m 1(J m m O V m ~ n [7 r n~ W /1 IJa) O N V o N m O m f ¢ w 10 m N m c'J f f V.o YJ O lj m O A _ ~ r (ulw) V N N OI m m f Jl m N _M p o V m m P a 41000 O N O I() O N O I() N c O N O Ifi N m young o 0 0 o z o 0 0 (.7 V) ~ m O m J LL ~ M ~ easy o N N W ywod W d N 4 w Z N C a) W W W W may. W W W w ¢ U N m U N ~ V m + e II U E N N m p E T `0 o N 0 o E o _m o C D ~ o F Z _O F 1.1. Z LU U Z O U LL O W N LL c~ C O LL a Z Q F O N N r W Q O 9 O m M O Z c S. U Y ~ y Y } Q1 Z O ~ Q ~ J 0 U OJ Q yU Y c ~ E a w ~ w m J Q U Z ~ W N ~ ~ ~ m N r r ~ - ° ~ O OJ O M Z H M r V M ` v co [O 6 A N 47 N LL ~ W O N } Z Q L . M ~ O M V A Ol V V O r V' N (p CI E - N M V N O O N - rj ~ J - I I U H zZ U) a _ a~ O O N ifJ O O O W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m ~ r O O O O O O O O O O O O O W ` y N M N N r O V M N O M W O O N N 1~ OJ N O D7 V (O A to a ( ~ N O r N D O O O O ~ J 7 M W N N Y U w a _ U V O N OJ W N n r r N W O M U Q F M r N m N V (O N m A O (O V YN N 1- Z N M d' T V OJ A O A m M H N M In N M N O O N ° N th N N J y O 47 N O O O O tU O O N N O W 4 O O O oj N N M O O M O O O M > v N N N N N N N N ~ W CL ro r o r N o M v o o in o 0 o m O o r N M N V N N LQ co to N N O ~yJ J N N O O O O O O U') G y F- J w _ O W O O O O O O O O O O O O O « O LO O O N . O O J O ) O O O O O O O O w Z- O) N V c C N V ro O O O O ¢S W O (O D N N ' W O M N M of tU J V I r d N (O ro A N (p F- Z r W O of A N V r m M N N N N ~ A 'C Y) O to (p M N W V O1 ~ N N N a ~ J W f- W d« M (D N of N N (O V N N N ~ W O J ~ O O O O O O O O O 0 p O O O O ~ y O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q F W ~ I- O O O O ° O O O O O O O O O O LL N z Z H o 0 0 0 ° ° o o ° o o ° 0 0 o m m - Z o6 tri co O N r q N O p N m N CO M J N M N N N tU N V N N N M N U) y y M M M M M M Y1 N N lfl N M N N N N N N ~ M M M M M M ~ A M N ro of N W W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Z Q A V r (U N N W (O r O ifJ M M ~ O O N M N a d O O O M N M N V N N N O OJ N ~ ~ N N G1 Q Q a N N O O O O N O O O O O O m 7 U) Z C7 y Q R flJ c) W LL S - Y J Z O 3 N N N w [Y O O O O T M N O N Z 6 N ry U c ~ N Y N o M o E N O U C Z ~ rn 0 o ~a`o Z W C7 y X W m ❑ W M WO Ca O N❑0 LU Ir aw ❑ Z Z Q J a a: ¢ N ❑ Z 20 z F O aQ U) 0 0 Q N p Y r m T N 9 N N Y U N ~ (0 (p L 000 U) Y o rn o m N N co co a x x x x (u!w) N v rn N r W o (D _ a o ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ J (Sd)) M O M V N N (rnp W I~)IOO!an ([i ( O vi V n x (j) r r M o r o ~ y)6ua-I (d m v `6 N (u!) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 azls ad!d ~ of % v c6 v _ N N W a a N) ado!S O o O o O ry O N o O o O N 0 NO) M01=1 V M V (O M V Q N N r r rn (s)3) W MOIj W M edo!S (SID) a r o c6 v co LL p r r of LLO J4N! °0 6Ni °o Z I (ri v N (~V) N rn 0 (u!w) Ol N 0 M 6 0 N t(J N (SID) M rn N r V N M rn M M M V r N M V a O O N N rn M M M N N r N M M U N N O O N O O O M N O O N J4/U! o N o o a r o v 0 N 0 N 0 o 0 0 0 o 0 rn 0 m 0 M 0 o o v N N o o 0 0 I M to M c7 c] M N N N M v M Lo M V 6 L6 LL LL (oe) N N N M rn N O M M M N R N O rn O O M M O r N M N (6 M f6 N W W M V Z V.J O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C C .N O (Ulw) N M O rn rn N N O N M O O O N N N O rn O O m m O U 61 M p I(j V M N_ O 6 O to O 6 r 6 O ^ _N O LL'] M l(J O In ~ ~ O 1n W JJ300 M M M M M M N N N N N N M N N N N N N ❑ .4ouny M 0 M 0 M 0 M 0 M 0 M 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 M 0 M 0 M 0 M 0 CO 0 CO 0 CO 0 (ov) r (D N O M O (O N M N (D M r N O V N M M N M M N O o M O N N M N N N ea.1y N N O O O O N O O O O O O U61saa 3 7 N M D O O O )u!od N M V N M r M m O N M V N (Y M r M U61 So(] y ki E 2 p 2 2E z p 3 6 6 C C C 2 2 C C Ir O O 1 O 1 r T O N ° o a z n ~ w o c ~ o s ~ o(n❑ E g o c Z ~ m n o 10 z W N ~ W ~ ❑ ❑w m c) n W O nO z W ❑ ? ~L H RRQ❑ Z U) 20 m H¢ O K N 0 U o U N Ytr~ m T ~ d N ~ N y U N ~ (0 (0 L U ❑ U Y - 9 o Q o: T M T w a z (Ulw) 33 0 o v o W O O O O O O (sd;) ° ° m a ~n n ~ c o j ,glool'A ui co r ~ri v ui ~ y36ua-l co r0 rv (UI) 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 o O ails adld tti ro 0 v o~ v N N Wa 0 °o N o o O a adolS o o (w) -old U6lsap of v fD (w) W mold w a: w adolS (SJo) r M M N a to ~ ci ri co LL LL jy/u! o ~n o O o m o z I v v 7 (OV) (V.0) r m m c o wnS N M (ulw) of o co m o Yl N N (SJ'J) N OJ O r M (D rn W ~ rn h OJ ~ rn O In N V (O M M M W t0 (D ~ Ol (O V (O N M r ~ m rn V O N ~ M O m ~ V a ~y/u! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O o 0 0 0 0 0 m v ° M co m a v v LO M M v M o v v r ai n co i6 co of of of r ro ~ of i6 of of of LL (oe) ~n o rn m m M m - m o M N N r m M w w o O ~ m m v, m r N a 0 0 m 0 0 0 o h h v o z d= 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m m K (UIW) O rn O O O N w O V O O m m O M o N O M O o o r o o m o m a~ O F W J4800 r r r r r r o o N o 0 o r m m m m m m Q ~(J 1(l l() ~(1 N IU t!) w N N N ~(J m w OJ OJ 6 m 0 w 6 44Ouny o 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 (OV) r (O K1 N OJ fO r ~(J O In M N ('J OJ N O O OJ O N Vl M N N tU Ip q O t0 N M O easy N N O O O O N O O O O O O u6lsap rr a m U ❑ w LL cD x - Y Y z o o 0 0 ea,y lulod N M a u m r m rn o N M V N ~ m r m u6! sad y Q m U ❑ r N W M LL N d r' N M m m m m m S S d = d U _ - Y z 0 N N C C C E 2 2 C 2 _E O O O Existing Runoff vs. Proposed Runoff Pre-Development Flow Basin ID Rate Minor Major cfs cfs EX.1 AND 14.5 74.6 SE2 EX.4 6.9 28.3 Included in EX.2.1 N.A. Basin EX.2 EX.2 4.4 35.05 Included in Included in EX.2 Basin EX.2 Basin EX.2 EX.3 9.11 54.88 Post-Development Flow Rate Basin ID Minor Major cfs cfs EX.1 AND 14.5 74.6 SE2 EX.4 6.9 28.3 Skyline 3 Included in Included in Pond Outfall Pond Outfall Pond Outfall Skyline 3 1.9 11.1 Pond Outfall Basins 2 88 8.63 J, K, and N Basins 12.49 65.86 L and M Totals 34.91 1 192.83 Totals 38.67 188.49 DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1) TABLE RO-5 Runoff Coefficients, C Percentage Im erviousness T e C and D NRCS H drolo is Soil Grou s 2- r 5- r 10- r 25. r 50- r 100- r 0% 0.04 5 0.25 0.37 0.44 TWO-] 5% 0.08 0.18 0.28 0.39 2 0.46 0 _ 0.52 10% 0.11 0.21 0.30 0.41 6 0.53 15% 0.14 0.24 0.32 0.43 0.49 0.54 20% 0.17 0.26 0.34 0.44 0.50 0.55 s 25% 0.20 0.28 0.36 0.46 0.51 0.56 30% 0.22 0.30 0.38 0.47 0.52 0.57 35% 0.25 0.33 0.40 0.48 0.53 0.57 40% 0.28 0.35 0.42 0.50 0.54 0.58 45% 0.31 0.37 0.44 0.51 0.55 0.59 50% 0.34 0.40 0.46 0.53 0.57 0.60 55% 0.37 0.43 0.48 0.55 0.58 0.62 60% 0.41 0.46 0.51 0.57 0.60 0.63 65% 0.45 0.49 0.54 0.59 0.62 0.65 70016 0.49 0.53 0.57 0.62 0.65 0.68 75% 0.54 0.58 0.62 0.66 0.68 0.71 80% 0.60 0.63 0.66 0.70 0.72 0.74 85% 0.66 0.68 0.71 0.75 0.77 0.79 90% 0.73 0.75 0.77 0.80 0.82 0.83 95% 0.80 0.8 0.84 0.87 0.88 0.89 100% 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.95 0.96 T e B NRCS H drolo is Soils Grou 0% 0.02 0.08 0.15 0.25 0.30 0.35 5% 0.04 0.10 0.19 0.28 0.33 0.38 10% 0.06 0.14 0.22 0.31 0.36 0.40 15% 0.08 0.17 0.25 0.33 0.38 0.42 20% 0.12 0.20 0.27 0.35 0.40 0.44 25% 0.15 0.22 0.30 0.37 0.41 0.46 30% 018 0.25 0.32 0.39 0.43 0.47 35% 0.20 0.27 0.34 0.41 0.44 0.48 40% 0.23 0.30 0.36 0.42 0.46 0.50 45% 0.26 0.32 0.38 0.44 0.48 0.51 50% 0.29 0.35 0.40 0.46 0.49 0.52 55% 0.33 0.38 0.43 0.48 0.51 0.54 60% 0.37 0.41 0.46 0.51 0.54 0.56 65% 0.41 0.45 0.49 0.54 0.57 0.59 70% 0.45 0.49 0.53 0.58 0.60 0.62 75% 0.51 0.54 0.58 0.62 0.64 0.66 80% 0.57 0.59 0.63 0.66 0.68 0.70 85% 0.63 0.66 0.69 0.72 0.73 0.75 90% 0.71 0.73 0.75 0.78 0.80 0.81 95% 0.79 681 0.83 0.85 0.87 0.88 100% 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.95 0.96 06/2001 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District RUNOFF C Ha rn?'? / ~2~'.. rcn E- ' SI FJ Er.>'' _a V Q. 0, W RO-11 DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL TABLE 3-1 (42) RECOMMENDED-RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS AND PERCENT IMPERVIOUS LAND USE OR SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS PERCENT IMPERVIOUS Business: Commercial Areas 95 Neighborhood Areas 70 Residential: Single-Family Multi-Unit (detached) 50 Multi-Unit (attached) 70 1/2 Acre Lot -or Larger Apartments 70 Industrial: Light Areas 80 Heavy Acres 90 6 Parks, Cemetaries: 7 Playgrounds: 13 Schools: 50 Railroad Yard Areas 20 Undeveloped Areas: Historic Flow Analysis- 2 FREQUENCY 2 5 10 RUNG;; ~a 100 L✓~ £ .87 .87 .88 .89 .60 .65 .70 .80 .40 45--- _n--.50 .60 v .45 50 .60 .70 .60 .65 .70 .80 .30 .35 .40 .60 .65 .70 .70 .80 .71 .72 .76 .82 .80 .80 .85 .90 .10 .18 .25 .45 .15 .20 .30 .50 .45 .50 .60 .70 .20 .25 .35 .45 (See "Lawns") S hE e±, I-n ~ Greenbelts, Agricultural Offsite Flow Analysis 45 .43 .47 .55 .65 (when land use not defined ) Streets: Paved 100 .87 .88 .90 .93 Gravel (Packed) 40 .40 .45 .50 .60 Drive and Walks: 96 .87 .87 .88 .89 Roofs: 90 .80 .85 .90 .90 Lawns, Sandy Soil 0 .00 .01 .05 ..20 Lawns, Clayey Soil 0 .05 .15 .25 .50 NOTE: These Rational Formula coefficients may not be valid for large basins. `See Figure 2-1 for percent impervious. 11-1-90 i URBAN DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1) TABLE RO-3 Recommended Percentage Imperviousness Values Land Use or Surface Characteristics Percentage Imperviousness Business: Commercial areas 95 Neighborhood areas 85 Residential: Single-family Multi-unit detached 60 Multi-unit attached 75 Half-acre lot or larger Apartments 80 Industrial: Light areas 80 Heavy areas 90 Parks, cemeteries 5 Playgrounds 10 Schools 50 Railroad and areas 15 Undevelo ed Areas: Historic flow analysis 2 Greenbelts, agricultural 2 Off-site flow analysis when land use not defined 45 Streets: Paved 100 Gravel acked 40 Drive and walks 90 Roofs 90 Lawns, sand soil 0 Lawns, cla a soil 0 RUNOFF o QftACl~er! ~ /~PZ * See Figures RO-3 through RO-5 for percentage imperviousness. Based in part on the data collected by the District since 1969, an empirical relationship between C and the percentage imperviousness for various storm return periods was developed. Thus, values for C can be determined using the following equations (Urbonas, Guo and Tucker 1990). CA = KA + (1.31i' -1.441' + 1.135i - 0.12) for CA ? 0, otherwise CA = 0 (RO-6) CCD = KCD +0.858? - 0.786i' + 0.7741 + 0.04 (RO-7) Ca = (CA + CcD )12 in which: i = % imperviousness/100 expressed as a decimal (see Table RO-3) 06/2001 RO-9 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1) 90 8D 70 60 0 L $ 50 E c m 6m 40 ~S f 30 20 10 0 RUNOFF l . f L homes 7 , 1 3,000 sq. ft homes i 0 00 2,000 sq. tL homes / • Y / • i • • • 0000 1,000 sq. k. homes 1 • / A r ~ 000, 1 10 / 00, 2 _?q a 4 Single iemlly Dwelling Units per Aare FIGURE RO-3 Watershed Imperviousness, Single-Family Residential Ranch Style Houses 4'Qwx, 06/2001 RO-15 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1) 50 30 20 W cc W IL 10 Z W a O 5 Ch W 3 O U 2 emc W H Q 3 1 5 RUNOFF 4 3 0 W s P 3 O r r w 4o A J W? aW Jv r O ~ v o r v ~ O °W Ir =t O = V W ' p °P c y 1W J Q° ~ J W ;r Y y ° J ¢ er or o q 4W O W' Z N v Q AS 3 3 °P 0 i ti iW c I y° SW h i C v 4 + . W a` ~ ~ 1 .2 .3 .5 1 2 3 5 10 20 VELOCITY IN FEET PER SECOND FIGURE RO-1 Estimate of Average Overland Flow Velocity for Use With the Rational Formula 0612001 RO-13 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District S 8 7 ¢ O 6 CL CL - N 5 w x U z 4 r f- z w l Z 3 2 1 0 0 FIGURE 5-1 EXAMPLE 5.2 TIME - INTENSITY - FREQUENCY CURVES T. 3 S. R.66 W. 5-1-84 URBAN DRAINAGE d FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 10 20 30 40 50 60 TIME IN MINUTES APPENDIX C STREET CAPACITY Melody Homes KM-Jab #020312 Skyline Estates III October2002 Final Drainage Report Appendix Cross Section 1.19% Slope Cross Section for Irregular Channel STREET CApAC rr`( Project Description Project File h:\020312\drain\streets.fm2 Worksheet STREET CROSS-SECTION 1.19% Flow Element Irregular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Discharge Section Data Wtd. Mannings Coefficient 0.013 Channel Slope 0.011900 ft/ft Water Surface Elevation -0.08 ft Discharge 7.88 cfs -0.693889-- z C 0 N W akStN 9 75Cs 06/12103 FlowMaster v5.15 02:49:07 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 Station (ft) - Cross Section 4% Slope Cross Section for Irregular Channel ' 77 IFST- C)4PAC IT Y Project Description Project File h:\020312\drain\streets.fm2 Worksheet STREET CROSS-SECTION 4% Flow Element Irregular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Discharge Section Data Wtd. Mannings Coefficient 0.013 Channel Slope 0.040000 ft/ft Water Surface Elevation -0.08 ft Discharge 14.44 cfs 0.05 -0.69388939e-1 c 0 0 W -0.0 -0. -0.1. -0.: -0.2 -0.: -0.3; -0., -0.45 L- 0.0 NozTgERN 1-1'ALF DF IDEv ELOPMENT' x,22 c': 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 Station (ft) 10104/02 FlowMaster v5.15 10:35:44 AM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Cross Section 1 % Slope Cross Section for Irregular Channel S- REST CAPACITY Project Description Project File h:\020312\drain\streets.fm2 Worksheet STREET CROSS-SECTION 1% Flow Element Irregular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Discharge Section Data Wtd. Mannings Coefficient 0.013 Channel Slope 0.010000 ft/ft Water Surface Elevation -0.08 ft Discharge 7.22 cfs -0.6938893'. C 0 N W BASIN D G I C-Fs Qcol z, q ~C~S Q5" 10/04/02 FlowMaster v5.15 10:35:04 AM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 v'0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 Station (ft) NN APPENDIX D STORM SEWER SYSTEM Melody Homes KM-Job #020312 Skyline Estates III October-2002 Final Drainage Report Appendix Scenario: 100-year P.} 6 0111¢12 Ie IB ,.I! PaI)r Ou 11e1l 1 ON D G 0u".IG P9 11nN ~01 P.II oullel h 1, )u ~Ie1 X PB Title: Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 Project Engineer: Steve Kocher h:\020312\drain\skyline3-revised.stm Kirkham Michael Consulting Eng StormCAD v3.0 [319] 06/12/03 10:19:26 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 t Q R C 0 O O m E O O V B E O U NL V ~ N N m N W N r' N N N N r n W M E Q v N V M W V m W N N N N O O 0 0 M M 0 0 0 0 V o N 0 0 0 o O o o O o 0 0 Z0 r N V N O N m W O N N O) ~ M " r Q) n O ~ N ~ r OR V n N 0) N n W m V U O N M V M c'1 th r t7 t7 7 M N tl C] -O O~ r f N r v 0) r W O n n N r N N O n N m r N r m n r N m O O N N N W N N C . p M N M N r O W N N N V N r W n n N r O O N N n N V r O > a . N M M c'l f l N M M V N M V M M M M N N V (V N N V N M M V V V 7 O~ 0 0 ~ U ~ L N N V O N O N m M O N O N O N N M 0) N T N W N O) V N r N r r r N W W C m W m W m W M of O o m o o N N N m m N W O O 0 0 M M M M M M M V a aO-3~ = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o OV O N m M N M M r N N r N N O N V V m V m N W W m N m O N N W r m W W t c N M O O m N m N M N M 0 0 O M O O m n N N m V N M V M m N N 6 3 ^ n n m m r m N N V V N O V V m m V V N V V v M M M m N N N 0 0 » 0- M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M C 0 V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V N N N N N N N N N N N N N m N N N N N N tN N N N N N N 6 N N N N N N N N N O M M m M m N W N n O m m r r a> n n r O N W O M n N N V O r N O W W m m m V N N c6 N M N m N O O M O 0 m m m m O r m r m r M 0 3. a3 6 4 4 4 m m m m m m m m m m m m ~ ~ i °O m m m m m mmmmm mmm S p " v v v v v a v a v v v a v v a v v v v_ v v a v v v v v_ a v v v v v v N N N N N N N to N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Yl N N N N N N N N N 01 N O W N m N M W M M V N M M O M N W M n W N M N O V V C M N O W . O. O) m N N V n m V M n N O O) r Ol n M m O) N N J N N N m m N N 6 N 0 N ~Il N V V W m (O (O m m m N 1 t0 C6 N (V U O 'er " M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M W p v v v v v v_ v v v v o a v v_ v_ v a v v v v< v a e a a o v v v v a N N N N In N N N N N N N N N N m N N N N N N 6 N N N N N h N N N N N N O N W M N M M r N N n N N O N V V W V W N M W W N W O N N W r W W W N M N O n O W W N m N M O O W O W N m N m N M N W n m ) W W N C 0 m mmmmmm ~mM mmmmmM C ~mm~m~~N on o mm~~m~~~ J v v v V V V a v v v v V V V V v v v_ v_ v V V a v v v v V V V V a v a C N N N 6,6 N N N N N N N N N N Yl 60 N N N N6 N N N N N 6666 N6 N N N N N V D7 O V O O O m m O N W N M N N M O O O O N O O m m O O O r- O M M M O M V W M V M O1 M M M M N W N N O n O O N c c ni v v of of Oi ai a r w ai r of m ci ui n r r v n r ei - O a3: V V V V V V V' V M M v M M M V' V M M V M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M OD Q - v a v v vv a a o v v vv a v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v vv N N N N vi n ] L6 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 6,6 4N N N N N N N vi 6 N T m W O N N W m V V N N O~ N N r OI0 W O N N N W O n N W m O N M O N V O M N M < M V M N a M M N M M V Q 1 D m O O O O n o 01 O M O W O N O V O m 0 0 0 M O m O M O 0 n r O M 0 d W O N O W O m O m O W O N O N O m O N O N O n O W 0 m O O O m O m O T O O r O W O M O N 0 m O r O N 0 0 0 m O r O m O a> N N N N m V O 0 0 W 0 O) O W O N N r 0 V N N O V N V N O N V N M N N m O N N W O N M O 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 O O Ow N O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n n n O O O O O C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O, 0 O O O n N N w- n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U L O O N M O O r O O N W W m m V N O N N W n N O r N N V M N V m m O m~ V V N V V O N N M M V m N M m ~ N ' N N ~ m r ~ m ~ N N ~ r W J N N C O p. N ~p L ~p L N L N L N L N L N L N L N L ~p L N L N L N L _ ry L N L ry L N U IN = U U U O U m U U U O U U U U O C U= U C C C C U= C U O U O U C C C t C C C C C C C C MN ` m M` W W m M W W W m M W W m M W a U ~ U U N ~ V O M O M M M M M M M M V V M O V N M N M" M O O O M O O O O C m Q) N m N m V M V ~(l V M V m V m V O) V V V V V O N O V O N O O ti t ¢ U N O O N r V r r V n N r N m n N M r r r N N N O- r O N W N U v N N p U v v o O W o v a o O m M O o m o r E _ M N M v M M rn v rn v N W o O o 0 F-.S ~ v e vi Ili L6 (D r N n of of ci o 0 0 n 0 m N m M V O O N m m O O O O E D N W V M M V M n N N N N N N O O O O N N O N `1 O O O O O r ~ O O O O n0<, N N N O cUu N M M M M M M O O U M M M M M M o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y N W O N V n O O N N ~ m M M N N m O O I N ~ r ~ r O O Q N N N N O N Q N N N O n U m r m m N W y N V V N m LL N N 0 0 0 N O O y O Z O M S S S S _ d 2 S S 2 2> N S d S= S S S Z S > S S S O 2 2 2 2 2 2 E 2 2~t OE i E 2 2C 2 2 2 O O 2~2: O 2 2 O m m " U M_ O Y o y > > m moa m a "U `m E N c O a CO W U U 0 a` m 6 N O N Q N 7 0 N O f c w ~ m ~ c ~ J N N ~ u3 d D R ~ L O U_ , E NO N 0 y O O 1 m n c N L D N S O E M ~ d N Z j m N LL O ~ N C a ~ m a w G O O C D N TN' co OO O m o m Fco ~ rn - U M U y o y > i 9:oa m0 E ~ E c o y w U d O a` R T Q) 0 L L a m c uV Cl) II N n O N m O O cH U w m~ 3 ~ N ~ U U U L N E ~ R y O Y p7 r M U c n ~ m EE a K N oe.., ° ~~o~Hy DEE ~a'va N a O L N O N N 0 E M d y Z > and C - M LL C N Y m N W C m ~ a c T N M N M O O p N NO M 0 F L 0 4 M Q 0-) d- a--' ~ M CU d- L J ' V J CD- E Co 4) Ln vJ O O L L a ~ d L~ V J w CV co Ch co CY) co 75 L, J - Lo Q. CU Co - 'I -j Of U) a O N uj O CD CD C) CZ) B 00 P-- co LO N~- m m co M C'0 co m U-) LO LO Lf) LO LO L~ N O O ~i O Co -I--& CD CJ) 1A_ LO 00 r- O C`7 m } 00 - M c O O Lo U) 0 O O } - O CO Lo > > O Cll • . O 0 0 co a) . . J ZD 0 J C/) CJ) U CI O O r y 0 o y > > m dpa E o E m c o my W U N a` L6 0 N Q N O 0 F U c wz m, €e N U 0 3 U a 9 rt A L O u ~ ~ d 9 R y L U ~ O Y m r n ti ui a 0 s N E N N d o Z m m C f7 LL ~ ~ N ~ N O N W In C ~ 9 r T N N N M O O O m o m r 0 L d T d N O ~ L L CL m d V N ` - T c O 4- cu > ~ W O W U- OC7 '1*' N ~ S ~ ~ C:) CD C) O O C) ~ ~ Lo L / L J L J ~ L J L\ 1 J Li J I 00 ti O LO d- M E M M co co M M CB - =3 d' d' d ct J Cn _ LO LO LCD Lf7 LO LC) T 00 V / 00 co M CV 00 M Ll J _ Lf~ Q E Ja C6 ~ J fr- U) O O O + -4- O .V -4 co - J C/) O co r O M M ~t - C O r LCD Lo U M CN = O r . - C:) O 0 O C6 Q C: a) J J co co U CI O O " Y o d i > m moa N Q - U E c ) N W v d d N N O N 0 0 ~ U W ~ Of d `03 U d O t d u 0 E d E R 0 O Y co N d a d m x 0 E N N a O y Z my c ~ N C Q d N N w C 1fI N d 0 C T N ~ N m o 0 0 d No " F .E o l7 d T d N O L L a = d V N O r EE ~ m IaEE I Il III I p ~ _ o I I 1 1 - cma ry £ /d> me ET 16 Y o w > m > > m dpa Na E ~ E c o ~N W d a` b O N n N Q N 7 m O n O 0 m~ c U W Z m~ c ~ d c m u3 AD L N u 0 E a R 0 O Y p7` r m v c N D L N N Q E N ~ D O > ZN c W C a C IA _ Q N N O w=a C D T N ~ N N O O O _d O N F L O N O ~ UJ O ~--M LO V J CL --E E ~ m co J0~ U) d LO a` c`a C V I V! LF- T 4- c O cu a) O O O O O /l U'> c:) O c:) O / V J 00 I` co c LO co co M M M LC) LO LCD Lf) LO O O =M~ - ~ Q . E co M JO~ U) O ce) 00 O O T O V- _O c/) U M U O - Y o y > > m Q U E y w U N O a` L6 N U) m 0 r <o 0 H W m ~ ~a 3 `w N ~ U 3 N p 2 f ~ E N 0 _ O Y M r NJ ti L d N LO Cfl LO d ~ o M M d'd" O U-)~ O OLo Lo ~ ~ O - E E L L 0- (D N T "a Z • > > O O ILL N O Ta CD N C o co CL N N N JZD 0 JCJ) U) T boo pro m d 0 0 ` m a uU Cl) A-0 T r r U o c~ -b- M N d-o ,q~t V r1 L~ v W • ' E~ C6 J co M N 0~ C.0 r LO ~ co J ~ Cn O `v ui 0 0 C) C:) C) LY^ J L Lo Lo V J U-) CD m / w r-- co co d' M M M M L3I YJ La) y/ y) 4}+ 4- 00 co r o C.0 co T_ M M o Lo -C C-) ~ CD ' r . L L CO C:> . > > r r CM ..CD C: No Cu a) .N J ~O J C/) co 0 co d- o M o M W N L~ _o 4-1 cu C/) `w m u ih o Y o N > > N moa U d E c `o m vi c W U 0 O a N ¢ 0 0 ~U c Wr j D ~ d N >N O > U n L 0 U 0 d a R y t o Y m m a N 0 E m N d ~ N Z> m~ ads N C ~ Y (7 ~ N O W C O Co V T N N O ~ Gi ON mm z 0 t O NNQ 4L f0 O O R r O w ~ C a d E O U N L E d^ E ? O m O O m O O m m V O r N N m N N 0 ° 8 m 'r ° 0 o N t 0 o ^ H o o o Z p o _ ~ N rn M r m o m m m m m N r n r m o f ~ f° C5 o M rn v r m M i+~ m m Lo M 6 r N r o i ~ U o r ri ci of of v a of ~ n C n v rn r 01 W r r N n N N O r N m r N r m r r N m O O N N N m N O) M N M N r O rn N N N O N r rn r U0 S O ' r N r W O N N r N< c r O V N C] M N M M V N Cl V M Co Co C) N N e 4 { N IV cq N 7 N M Cj 4 4 4 M f L C p w m O r O N i( O O m O rn N M N r M n N r m N a N 0) N O rn O M rn N C m N N m N N N O O Q V m a OI 0 0 rn N N N O N N ~(l (p N V? m V M M M R V Cl 7 < V C O f N O O C O N m M N M M n N N r N N O N V C m st m m m m m N m O N N m r m m m N M O ~ O m N m N M N M O ~ O ~ O m O O m n 3 D ~ m r N N m O N M R M m N r I~ m m n m N N V s1 N V V y ~p m v v m .a C C M m S O `v c M M N N N M M CJ M M M M M M M M M M M M M M C') M C') M CJ M M M M M M M M M' O O v a v? a a a a p a a a a a a a a a a v a a a a a U5 a~ y a .y v v v v N N N N N N N N N L6 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 'o L6 N h N h N C M N m N m N r m N M N C N N r rn N r N O N rn M O M N V r m m m r M N m 0 m m N m m V rn m M M m M O n w M m N N r N N N a y r M Cl (V N of m m m IN O of m co m r n m m m ? DO p " 0 m m m M N N N N m v a v° °a v a v ° a v v v v v v v v v v v v a v e o v a a a v o v v o v N h N N 0 N N 0 0 N N Y) ih N N N N N N N L6 N N N N 6 i N N L N u vi N L6 N C O v N N N N L6 N 6 ri L6 uj uj N N N IN 0 N N N Vl N N 1O h N N h M M r " N n N N O N v v m o m m m N m O m O m E co m N Sri r O 6 M N N N N N N N N N YJ YN N N N Ltl l(l N 1n N IN 1A to N N N N Lri 'p ^ N v m O V O O O m W O N rn N M N N m 0 0 0 0 N O O m rn 0 0 O O M M M O M' h n;^ t m M C M W M M t M N m N N O r O O N M V v ai of of rn a r of ro r ro m os co V o 6 ' O C 0::)o L c Q r r r v r r ri ? `T a V M M M M M V V M M V M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M v v v v v v v v a v v v e a p v v v v v v v_ o v a v a v e v v_ o v a a i(l N vi 6 N 6 Ln ui 6 Sri N N N 6 Lo iri N N N N N Lri 6 N ui vi N lO N N h IN Lo N 0 _T m m N N N U N M O O m N m n m y O M m r5 r m n N rn 0 O N N Ci h r N r O v Ci ci of of of v a a ri vi Q> D 0 N U O) O M O N O N O r O m O N O m O N O m c r O V O M O N O N O r O V O O O O O O O O M O 0 0 O W O rn O rn O m O V 0 m O O M O O O N O O W O m 0 O N O N O N O O O O M 0 0 0 rn O O m 0 0 0 0 r O N O N N r N N N r C i N 0 N V m M N V m M N r N m m r 0 ~t N M O N N O O O O O O O O M O O O O O O O O O N 0 n W C 0 0 0 O N O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0° O 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 rn^ N N r N O° ^ O O N m m m m N C „Y„ O O N N a M N V W ( V a O N O V O N J ` ` M M V M ! M W N N m n N N N N r m r 0 0 U N Q L L O U- L~ L ry U U U-W U. U O U~ U~ U~ U O 'O 0 'O O L ry` L j m 5 p L U U U U U U U C C C C C C m (/1 ~ i % _2 % U- U C U C U C U C U C`~ U C U- U C U C % m U U U U U U U U U U U U U W U U U N C O)~ .U O rn° r O m M O M M M M N M m v o M v^ N M rn M N M O O O M O 0 0 0 N N N N N O rn< m V rn 0 O O M rn of 0 'V t d U 4 N V N V O N O R N O O) O N O rn r M r a r m r co r r m N n r co 0 o t r n r r r m o m r vi O m ~ - m p ' E E ° ° N m O ^ N O O N O m O N M N M o O O N rn v m a It N O o o r o a 16 M N Lo r r m 0 0 0 0 o m E.n ^ m m rn r v n r m a n o m rn N r ° ° ° o ; y v ° ° O o ° N m m , N C N O (V O (V co O O O O N N O O O O TOQ ~ UU N NQN cUv m C U r r r N N N ~f ~f i j O O O O O O O p O ° O p N d N m r ° O (q C) M d Q N N N ~ O N ~ ~ r r O O 0 N p r U S N N m r m m N Q W V N V V 0 m LL N 0 Zp _ N N N 0 O O ? O O _ 2 S 2 S 2 2 2 2 d 2 J - 2 2 d 2 S S 2 0 E E 2 2 O- - 2 2- 2 2 O n 5 5 5 n S S `o rn - o 0 Y O 0 > > m w 0 a U) Q L U E c `o m m W N ` a N O N m 0 O c U w ~ Oi C n J N N ~ O U O D R 0 L O U a. f w D L 0° O Y m` CrJ C O d N W 2 0 E N M p O ~ Z m N c LL N N a Y m N ~ N C " W ~ o C U N T N N O O d ON M - L O L R T O Q~ Q ~ Q a •c C V S N O O ' r 2~y N ~ E O N R J 0 0 0 0 0 0 m r o M M M e e r o S,o ~c ~'MN 0 0 M RAM ~Me oe.n N E a E 0 R w 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 M N M M (h CJ e e e e u: u~ v> u~ o 0 0 O l(J (O < N N M M ~ e e ° _ ° 2Ry`m° a C N J~OJ[n (A ~n m N M .J M M e S e<~ ~Y~1a~MLO c O -o d m y f o~ >>J~o o c c o.. o R R d C R~ 0 J ~ O J!/) VJ M m c0 N 0 0 ~ ~ M M _ ee° -oso Nu~u~ VO G 4.?j=NO a~cc rn..o a c o R GC N J~~J(n VJ dm~ Y o > > m 2oa y LU m E c o my w v N ` IL N h r O N Q N a O m ~ c U w ~ c ~ a a N ~ co 3 U v o A ry t O u m ~ v ns t O o Y m M U C N O N N N Q E N m O o ~ Z ~ O~ N C M LL ~ ~ N -a ~ _Yn N w ~ O d ~ C O N T N c N O O d NO M r o 4•''"-. CO f n v Lo j- cam ~M"zt 0 - t _ Lo ~ / ~ ti J ^ -0 E co - T J orf Cn 0 d O O a m I^V v/ O M W r 0 00 co = co C C ~ VJ LO Q E CB • - O J Of C/) c O cu Q~ w O O O O O O O C) O 0 O O 0 O O ti CO LO 'zt M N t- p M M M M M M M M ~t d• 1' ~ "zt 'Cl- d• "Zt LCD LO L() LO LO LCD LCD S CO O 4 O Cp U) U M O Y o ~ > > m a~pa v Q E v E C o` my w N 0 a` N n M O N 0 c U w Z m, ~a `m n ~ o ~ U as .2 U , 2y R O 0 ~ O Y p` r M N 1 _ 00 L ~t CY) a M M y o ~ CN 0 LO LO Co U d7 o - L Lpp• O CL ••00 (1) (3) E ~ / > > (3) z° ~ mm Ca O.N dTd J~OJC/)U) N~ w ~ O TN w M O O p N O M F- L O APPENDIX E INLET CAPACITY Melody Homes KM-Job X020312 Skyline Estates 111 October2002 Final Drainage Report Appendix N 7 ~ Q U f c O O O < 0 e e e a j W W O C 0 N r r 0 y (J U V O N 0 N 0 12 r a N V U ~~nr¢ - r m (O (O N r W O O O O M V d M ~ N N N M O O O O O O O O > o r m u r ~ N t() m N N N r 0 N h Q N 6 O O O O O ~ 6 N N ~ N O O O O J h h h N N vJ N tp O p O N CJ W O O p F- ~ V O ~ M n rn 6 r (~9 (D M c O LA y C ~ LL C y m Y c O _ cu Y H C W N C; M o oo m CJ U') > N U U~ CS m o Y o C cu O z Z a Z- m 'm a0 N N p 'p N E m aa`o 0 U~ e w N V m (C M ~ y n U O O O C L Q J y ~ ~ ^ p U w ~ o 0 0 0 N Cl? O W M W m w R O "J U N O M N N ~ L T G N m O U O r M Q N N (V N ~ In T O O O y M ~ V M M OJ ~ U W r N W t7 V N N r ~ O N (V O O J ~ C7 M M M C7 N EX'~^ rMNO O O d 3 cun) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a vLL z, co j co 3 Eu.www o y o» 0° N o 0 0 0 y O C D U c m 6 Q ¢1 U O W lL Z c n ° ~a N 0 M 7 O (O d 0 0 C O J w W N O) f0 C C t9 a 0 d N L y cn m C U O ~ 0 w IVJ KIRKHAM W [ti.1 MICHAEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS 6600Sowh Quebec Sneei•Suae200 D-C,.-ood V,11.ge,C0Rlll Job number: '`~'J.,- Sheet of r Project: rY~ '7 Date: Subject: A! L F Designed: Checked: ? -Z7~ COP C, 4"1 r ~-v, ,1\ 1 ~D rlreq v~( ~rl~>°~ w; - 7 'Sall 4-1 Ias~17 wImE d - J., , (n0 \ r N Q; : 6.3(, c Q 0r gyp= (ur to DVPt- UW Q,, %3 c~< Qom- 2,0q IvJ KIRKHAM W MICHAEL CONSULTING ENG I NEERS 56005outh Quebec Street -Suite 200D• Greenwood Village, CO 80111 Job number: M -02o3 12 Sheet of ti > Project: Date: IO - r -0 Subject: !~v: M Designed: Checked: n 0 5 09IFILE FLOC - Lo A ~o. C ) n C~rn'r~ Qi1Gt Cv~~ 6pFl-rE- CO. AD d> Au~ (A.~L Q. ?of 'S' fo, yT- z~ CuR~ EAJ Ird(~ C' 0, > 1'q h = o. 7 d = LVr~o>j,(i,S L' 2, 2.2)(0, ~J1 7,26 cFs I0TAL LET P4Ct ✓Ci nc~~2 ilJ f2 C~ rL DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1) STREETS/INLETS/STORM SEWERS TABLE ST-7 Sag Inlet Discharge Variables and Coefficients (Modified From Akan and Houghtalen 2002) Inlet Type C„ LWi Weir Equation Definitions of Terms Valid For Grate Inlet 3.00 L + 2W d < 1.79(A IL„) L = Length of grate W= Width of grate d= Depth of water over grate A,= Clear opening areal Curb Opening 3.00 L d < h L = Length of curb opening Inlet h = Height of curb opening d=d;-(h12) d; = Depth of water at curb opening Depressed Curb 2.30 L + 1.81Y d< (h + a) W= Lateral width of depression Opening Inlet' a = Depth of curb depression Slotted Inlets 2.48 L d< 0.2 ft L = Length of slot d= Depth at curb The weir length should be reduced where clogging is expected. 2 Ratio of clear opening area to total area is 0.8 for P-1-7/8-4 and reticuline grates, 0.9 for P-1-7/8 and 0.6 for P-1-1/8 grates. Curved vane and tilt bar grates are not recommended at sag locations. a If L > 12 ft, use the expressions for curb opening inlets without depression. Co Ao Orifice Equation Definition of Terms Valid for Grate Inlet 0.67 Clear d> 1.79(Ao/L„) d = Depth of water over grate opening s area Curb Opening 0.67 (h)(L) di>1.4h d=di-(h/2) Inlet (depressed di = Depth of water at curb opening or undepressed, h = Height of curb opening horizontal orifice throats) Slotted Inlet 0.80 (L)(4f) d> 0.40 ft L = Length of slot W = Width of slot d= Depth of water over slot 4 The orifice area should be reduced where clogging is expected. 5 The ratio of clear opening area to total area is 0.8 for P-1-7/8-4 and reticuline grates, 0.9 for P-1- 7/8 and 0.6 for P-1-1/8 grates. Curved vane and tilt bar grates are not recommended at sag locations. 6 See Figure ST-5 for other types of throats. 3.3.6 Inlet Clogging. Inlets are subject to clogging effects (see Photographs ST-5 and ST-6). Selection of a clogging factor reflects the condition of debris and trash on the street. During a storm event, street inlets are usually loaded with debris by the first-flush runoff volume. As a common practice for street drainage, 50% clogging is considered for the design of a single grate inlet and 10% clogging is considered for a single curb-opening inlet. Often, it takes multiple units to collect the stormwater on the 06/2001 ST-24 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District KIRKHAM WW fi ~~l MICHAEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS. DOSown Ou,b Strct•Smte2ooD•Greenwoodvulage,COeoll1 Job number: 02.00 Z Sheet of Project: V 1n-t <7r!-f < Date: Subject: ? KL E r " A f c.. Designed: 1< L Checked: ~PrGjlkk rer~uirM -~o Cap t(t 100% Trbw Eq. Z11 n Jy) L 1~C.rb~Erf"~~ F('•.CL! rv:r .,,rE~ t✓~-r,_ /:i ~ QCu~b _ r. ~X = ~~Ov.J ~in-*Prr p~;-art .~u\ Curb in {'-F_. v ro a,r~le c:.n~ 10 low NOT- '~nlerr~Plr~ ~ V e T 67 -q • 's S -T- Z Q~ low t (,v 4r ~ W KIRKHAM L~l MICHAEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS%OOSowh Quebec Sneet•Sulie 200D• Greenwood Village, CO 90111 Job number: Sheet - of Project: Date: Subject: Designed: Checked: Uo C~q~ S -r4.lf i t 4 C,~ S7'- Z o U; C), ~Le ` 1/tee Le Le = e-(;-Pc?-I L'I a n = ' P>~. C C. r _ L' v rr v o, r r`0 - F's . _ yZ SX T 2- V = Q/~ r-- 9, sr-- y V < ✓0 5 = I C T- o, 15' V ~'g ~9. 5K L2 rG t20 04 -21Je S 0j 41~rC P{J Cr ~V. 'rr,}rn _~+'F F`y✓til i 1 'J 2 Z MN APPENDIX F RIPRAP Melody Homes KM-Job #020312 Skyline Estates 111 Oclober2002 Final Drainage Report Appendix Project Name: Project No: Date: Design by: ine Estates Filin No. 3, Outfall G M-UZU312 06/30/03 C RIP-RAP CALCULATIONS Urban Drainage Criteria Manual OUTLET TO POND G Pipe Diameter (in) 18 Pipe Diameter (ft) 1.5 Qmo (cfs) 17 Pipe Velocity (ft/s) 9.89 Max Allowable Velocity (ft/s) 5.5 Normal Depth, Y„ (ft) 1.50 Da 1.50 Tailwater Depth, Y, 0.6 Y,/Da 0.40 Q/Da" 9.39 Riprap Type, Figure 5-7 L d5o (in), Table 5-1 9 Q/D2.5 6.26 1/(2*tan(-)), Figure 5-9 1.8 At = QNmax 3.14 Length (ft) = (1/(2*tan(-)))*(ANt-D) 6.7 (If L>10*D, L=10*D): Length (ft) 6.7 Tan(-) 0.278 Required Width (ft) 6.7 Amount of Riprap Required (yd3) 1.8 Assumptions: Flow is supercritical at pipe outlet Depth of Flow = Diameter Width = (2 * L * tan(-)) + (2 * Diameter) Yt = 0.4 * Diameter (d5o/D)(Y,/D)t 2/(Q/D2.5) = 0.027 - L\) , D"l _H 6' l Project Name: Project No: Date: Design by: Skyline Estates Filing No. 3,Outfall H M-020312 06/30/03 kjc RIP-RAP CALCULATIONS Urban Drainage Criteria Manual OUTLET TO POND H Pipe Diameter (in) 18 Pipe Diameter (ft) 1.5 Q100 (cfs) 18 Pipe Velocity (ft/s) 10.48 Max Allowable Velocity (ft/s) 5 Normal Depth, Y„ (ft) 1.50 Da 1.50 Tailwater Depth, Y, 0.6 Yt Da 0.40 Q/Da15 9.99 Riprap Type, Figure 5-7 L d50 (in), Table 5-1 9 Q/D2.5 6.66 1/(2*tan(-)), Figure 5-9 1.8 At = QN,ax 3.67 Length (ft) = (1/(2*tan(-)))*(A,/Yt-D) 8.3 (If L>10*D, L=10*D): Length (ft) 8.3 Tan(-) 0.278 Required Width (ft) 7.6 Amount of Riprap Required (yd3) 2.5 Assumptions Flow is supercritical at pipe outlet Depth of Flow = Diameter Width = (2 * L * tan(-)) + (2 * Diameter) Y, = 0.4 * Diameter (d50/D)(Yt/D)12/(Q/D2.5) = 0.025 S/ LF- NIGiH: r - i Project Name: Project No: Date: Design by: line Estates Filing No. M-uzu3lz 10/07/02 Outfall RIP-RAP CALCULATIONS Urban Drainage Criteria Manual OUTFALL FROM PONDS GAND H Pipe Diameter (in) 24 Pipe Diameter (ft) 2 Quo (cfs) 11 Pipe Velocity (ft/s) 5.67 Max Allowable Velocity ('Us) 5 Normal Depth, Y„ (ft) 1.23 Da 1.62 Tailwater Depth, Y, 0.8 Y,/Da 0.50 Q/Da1.5 5.42 Riprap Type, Figure 5-7 L d5o (in), Table 5-1 g Q/D2.5 1.97 1/(2*tan(-)), Figure 5-9 6.7 At = Q/Vmax 2.22 Length (ft) = (1/(2*tan(-)))*(A/Yt D) 5.2 (If L>10*D, L=10*D): Length (ft) 5.2 Tan(-) 0.075 Required Width (ft) 4.8 Amount of Riprap Required (yd3) 1.3 Assumptions Flow is supercritical at pipe outlet Depth of Flow = Diameter Width = (2 * L * tan(-)) + (2 * Diameter) Yt = 0.4 * Diameter (d5o/D)(Y,/D)'.2/(Q/D2.5) = 0.064 L-ENGTH ~ 5,Z' I\J.DTI H 4.1.&' DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1) n O O hilfS MAJOR DRAINAGE Use Do instead of D whenever flow is supercritical in the barrel. **Use Type L for a distance of 31) downstream. FIGURE MD-21 Riprap Erosion Protection at Circular Conduit Outlet Valid for Q/D2.e < 6.0 06/2001 MD-109 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1) 9 = Expansion Angle i 0 U U< 2 O rn 2 Q o_ X w FIGURE MD-23 Expansion Factor for Circular Conduits 06/2001 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District MAJOR DRAINAGE MD-111 TAILWATER DEPTH/ C&DUIT HEIGHT, Yt/D 1~ APPENDIX G DETENTION PONDS Melody Homes KM-Job #020312 Skyline Estates H7 October2002 Final Drainage Report Appendix KIIZKHAM MICHAEL DETENTION POND:VOL UME - PROJECT NAME: Skyline Estates Filing #3 DATE 3/11/2003 PROJECT NO.: M-020312 DESIGN BY: KJC Detention Pond G (eastern) V= ((Al'A2 1/2 + Al +A2) / 3 INCREMENTAL TOTAL TOTAL ELEV. AREA (FT') STAGE- (FT) VOLUME (FT') VOLUME (FT') VOLUME (AC-FT) 5430.00 n 0.00 0 0 0.00 831.00 12109 1-00 41 41 0.00 5452.00 12117.67 1.00 571 612 0-01 54.33.00 1-R131i7 1.00 1955 2567 0.06 5434,% 5098.95 1.00 3900 6467 0.15 5435.00 8796.3 1.00 6864 13331 0.31 543600 11800.37 1.00 10262 23593 0.54 54;700 1363(1. 17 1.00 12707 36300 0.83 STAGE VS STORAGE 5438,00 5437,00 5436.00 5925 (09 5435,00 543Y 60 u 5434,00 ~ 54}t VJ ,_I , F 5433,00 432.00 543100 5430 00 5429.00 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0,40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1,00 1.10 1.20 VOLUME (AC-FT) M~~~~a:oj ~ S GIFVn-t;~^n = S93Z. S0 uW = 0,n+ u. oz- 0.1- ct c - rt > W3 ejcv0+i6A- Vs-~ - 21 + 0.03 - 0.24 c, c- IAJS e IPVat on : Sy 39, 60 vlpo-~r= D.91+0.03= .4y Ac-,, >1n1~ ffc^V~dr07=S53a,aQ 0 KM PROJECT: Skyline Fil No.3 ENGINEER: KJC KM NUMBER: M-020312 DATE: 3/11/2003 Detention Storage Volumes (Pond G) 100 year Storm Empirical Sizing Method Percent V°ET (AC Land Use Imperv ious 1<100 Area (AC) FT) Single Family 35 0.063 5.09 0.32 Water Quality Capture Volumes Extended Detention Basin Percent i Area VWQvc Land Use ious Imperv (WQC" (A C) (AC FT) Single Family 38 0.17 5.09 0.09 Detention Storage Volumes & WQCV Single Family Pond Vt°tai = 0.41 ac/ft Notes: K100 = (1.781-0.002`12-3.56) 900 WQCV = (0.91'(1/100)1-1.19'(1/100)2+0.78'(1/100)) VTOTAL = VDET + VWQCV NOTES: 1. Single family imperviousness assumes ranch at 2500 sqft at 2.4 du/ac. FIG SQ-4 2. 40 hr drain time used. KM PROJECT: Skyline Fil No.3 ENGINEEF KJC KM NUMBER: M-020312 DATE: 3/11/2003 Detention Storage Volumes (Pond G) 5 year Storm Empirical Sizing Method Percent Land Use Impervious KS Area (A C) VDET (AC FT) Single Family 35 0.024 5.09 0.12 Water Quality Capture Volumes Extended Detention Basin Percent Land Use Impervious i Area V WQVc ("o) (WQCV) (AC) (AC FT) Single Family 38 0.17 5.09 0.09 Detention Storage Volumes & WQCV Single Family Pond Vmtai = 0.21 ac/It Notes: Ks = (0.771-2.65) 900 WQCV= (0.91*(1/100)3-1.19'(1/100)2+0.78'(1/100)) VTOTAL = VDET+VWQCV NOTES: 1. Single family imperviousness assumes ranch at 2500 sgft at 2.4 du/ac. FIG SQ-4 2. 40 hr drain time used. Project Name Project No: Date: Design by: Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 M-020312 03/12/03 WATER QUALITY / DETENTION POND G (eastern) Urban Drainage Criteria Manual Basin Storage Volume: Drainage Area Percent Impervious la = 35 % i = 0.35 Contributing Watershed Area Area = 5.09 acres Water Quality Capture Volume WQCV = 0.17 watershed-in Design Water Quality Volume Vol = 0.08 acre-feet Total Water Volume= 0.08 acre-feet Top Stage - 100-Yr Detention DTOP = 1.90 feet Storage = 0.32 acre-feet Surf. Area = acres Bottom Stage - Water Quality DwO = 3.70 feet Storage = 0.09 acre-feet Surf. Area = acres Total Pond Volume Vol,ot = 0.41 acre-feet atlet Works: Outlet Type Depth at Outlet Above Lowest Perforation Required Maximum Outlet Area per Row Perforation Dimensions (enter only one) Circular Perforation Diameter Number of Columns (Table 6a-1) Actual Design Outlet Area per Row Number of Rows Total Outlet Area X Orifice Plate Perforated Riser Pipe Other: H = 1.35 feet Ao = 0.38 square inches D = 0.6875 inches nc = 1 number Ao = 0.37 square inches j nr= 3 number Aot = 1.11 square inches Project Name Project No: Date: Design by: ine Estates Filina No. 3 M-020312 03/12/03 WATER QUALITY / DETENTION POND G (eastern) Urban Drainage Criteria Manual Trash Rack: Needed Open Area At= 39 square inches Type of Outlet Opening (Check One) X 2" Diameter Round 2" High Rectangular Other: For 2", or Smaller, Round Opening (Figure 6a) Width of Trash Rack and Concrete Opening Wconc = 3 inches Height of Trash Rack Screen HTR = 42.4 inches Type of Screen X S.S> #93 VEE Wire (US Filter Other: Screen Opening Slot Dimension x 0.139" (US Filter) Other: Spacing of Support Rod (O.C.) 0.75' inches Type and Size of Support Rod (Table 6a-2) #156 VEE Type and Size of Holding Frame (Table 6a-2) 3/8" x 1.0" flat bar Detention Basin Length to Width Ratio 1 (L/W) Main Basin Side Slopes z = 4.00 (H/V) Berm Embankment Side Slopes z = 4.00 (HIV) Vegetation X Native Grass Irrigated Turf Grass Other: KIRKHAM Job number: M ' 0Z 0212 MICHAEL CONSULTING EN GIN EERS5soo5oumQuebec Street, Suite 200D-Greenwood WUzge,GO 80111 Sheet of Project: SK~LiNE ES~TES ~ILING lY~.~ Date: S RAIL 6 0ul;- c.1 Subject: t_.j`.'T Designed: KTC Checked: ti, 100-Yt2 ~u~r>acF sL/7 l 0 i WO SU9FACE Sal X3.70 ~ I ~I \ g ~ GP . N~1croF0 0 c. ~ ~ 10t~-1'R 0;21r=tLC~. I I II ~ S~~ QIfiM °I OKiFicc, S-YR , I I ; t ~ ' ! ; I I f VJ KIRKHAM W MICHAEL Job number: CONSULTING ENGINEERSM0050umQuebCSnet-SUJW200D •G,.n .odW1q,CON111 I Sheet of i Project: - Date: `0`j r n r r Subject: ~r~ t O i d to Designed: Checked: 10 Cic - ic- o k)eq uired relOOJ iJotusn2 O. 01 c ~ T Srnin Pipe Slope - z 0/o ac - fit I- `/S c `s FOREBAY G OUTLET PIPES Worksheet for Circular Channel Project Description Project File h:\020312\drain\pipes.fm2 Worksheet FOREBAY G Flow Element Circular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Full Flow Capacity Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.009 Channel Slope 0.020000 ft/ft Diameter 6.00 in Results Depth 0.50 ft Discharge 1.15 cfs Flow Area 0.20 f12 Wetted Perimeter 1.57 ft Top Width 0.00 ft Critical Depth 0.48 ft Percent Full 100.00 Critical Slope 0.017534 ft/ft Velocity 5.84 ft/s Velocity Head 0.53 . ft Specific Energy FULL ft Froude Number FULL Maximum Discharge 1.23 cfs Full Flow Capacity 1.15 cfs Full Flow Slope 0.020000 ft/ft 10/17/02 FlowMaster v5.15 12:40:18 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 M KIRKHAM vu\j MICHAEL CONSULTING ENG IN EERS 5600 South Quebec Sheer Suite 200 o• Greenwood Village, CO 90111 Job number: M- a G 03 1 I Sheet of Project: S~~L IN F ES7 A-rFS F-I L nI G # Date: 2-/ 2 Subject: PD N F) G V UER ELDLAJ WE I r' Designed: KJ C Checked: q - 1' C = 3,0 Z x W o - 'rP_ Row -f•0 por14 Q = 2 x 2'-'. °1.x s3 cis. C ~ 3I2 Hsc 20' KlEip, LFfv6r/I KIRKHAM MICHAEL ; DETENTION POND VOLUME PROJECT NAME: Skyline Estates Filing #3 DATE: 6110/2003 Pond H (western) ELEV. 5431.35 543200 543300 5434.00 5435.00 5436.00 5417.00 54?300 AREA (FT') 0 295.79 2079.98 577397 9863.42 16408.22 21612.53 24456.31 At *A2)112 +At +A2) / 3 INCREMENTAL TOTAL TOTAL STAGE (FT) VOLUME (FT') VOLUME (FT') VOLUME (AC-FT) 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.65 64 64 0.00 1.00 1053 1117 0.03 1.00 3775 4893 0.11 1.00 7731 12624 0.29 1.00 12998 25621 0.59 1.00 18951 44572 1.02 1.00 23020 67592 1.55 STAGE VS STORAGE VNIy - V, I V v. e/ U. LW n . . ~ ~ - -7 ~N3s.o ' VS .,Q. g.10 t 0.ND H ? x.70 V . ~.?Ot x,1(0= ~.8~ C~c-~'r WS p~QVP.~"l~n' IOp-Y P- KM PROJECT: Skyline Fil No.3 ENGINEER: KJC KM NUMBER: M-020312 DATE: 6/10/2003 Detention Storage Volumes Pond (Pond H) 100 year Storm Empirical Sizing Method Percent VDET (AC Land Use Impervious Ktoo Area (AC) "7o FT) Single Family 35 0.063 6.02 0.38 Industrial 90 0.156 1.4 0.22 Total 0.59 Water Quality Capture Volumes Extended Detention Basin Land Use Percent Impervious I Area V wQVC (070) (WQCV) (A C) (AC FT) Single Family 38 0.17 6.02 0.11 Industrial 90 0.40 1.4 0.06 Total 0.16 Detention Storage Volumes & WQCV Single Family Pond Vtotal = 0.76 ac/ft Notes: K100 = (1.78*1-0.002*12-3.56) 900 WQCV = (0.91•(1/100)3-1.19*(1/100)2+0.78'(1/100)) VTOTAL _ VDET + VWQCV NOTES: 1. Single family imperviousness assumes ranch at 2500 sqft at 2.4 du/ac. FIG SQ-4 2. 40 hr drain time used. KM PROJECT: Skyline Fil No.3 ENGINEEF KJC KM NUMBER: M-020312 DATE: 6/10/2003 Detention Storage Volumes (Pond H) 5 year Storm Empirical Sizing Method Land Use Percent Impervious K5 Area (AC) VDET (AC M FT) Single Family Industrial 35 0.024 6.02 0.15 90 0.067 1.4 0.09 Total 0.24 Detention Storage Volumes & WQCV Land Use Percent Imperv ious I Area V N°VC N (WQCV) (AC) (AC FT) Single Family Industrial 38 0.17 6.02 0.11 90 0.40 1.4 0.06 Total 0.16 Single Family Pond Vmtal = 0.40 ac/ft Notes: KS (0.771-2.65) 900 WQCV = (0.91'(1/100)3-1.19`(1/100)2+0.78'(1/100)) VTOTAL = VDET+VWQCV NOTES: 1. Single family imperviousness assumes ranch at 2500 sqft at 2.4 du/ac. FIG SQ-4 2. 40 hr drain time used. Project Name: Project No: Date: Design by: Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 M-020312 WATER QUALITY / DETENTION POND H (western) Urban Drainage Criteria Manual Basin Storage Volume: Residential Industrial Drainage Area Percent Impervious la = 35 % I, = 90 % i = 0.35 i = 0.90 Contributing Watershed Area Area = 6.02 acres Area = 1.40 acres Water Quality Capture Volume WQCV= 0.17 watershed-in WQCV= 0.40 watershed-inches Design Volume Vol = 0.10 acre-feet Vol = 0.06 acre-feet Two-Stage Design: Top Stage - 100-Yr Detention DroP = 1.85 feet Storage = 0.59 acre-feet Surf. Area = acres Bottom Stage - Water Quality Dwo = 1.00 feet Storage = 0.16 acre-feet Surf. Area = acres Total Pond Volume Vol,., = 0.75 acre-feet itlet Works: Outlet Type Depth at Outlet Above Lowest Perforation Required Maximum Outlet Area per Row Perforation Dimensions (enter only one) Circular Perforation Diameter Number of Columns (Table 6a-1) Actual Design Outlet Area per Row Number of Rows Total Outlet Area X Orifice Plate Perforated Riser Pipe Other: H = 1.00 feet Ao = 015 square inches D = 0.6875 inches nc = 2 number A. = 0.74 square inches nr= 2 number k, = 1.48 square inches Project Name: Project No: Date: Design by: Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 M-020312 03/12/03 KJC WATER QUALITY / DETENTION POND H (western) Urban Drainage Criteria Manual Trash Rack: Needed Open Area A,= 105 square inches Type of Outlet Opening (Check One) X 2" Diameter Round 2" High Rectangular Other: For 2", or Smaller, Round Opening (Figure 6a) Width of Trash Rack and Concrete Opening W.~~ = 6 inches Height of Trash Rack Screen HTR = 10.0 inches Type of Screen X S.S> #93 VEE Wire (US Filter) Other: Screen Opening Slot Dimension X 0.139" (US Filter) Other: Spacing of Support Rod (O.C.) 3/4" inches Type and Size of Support Rod (Table 6a-2) #156 VEE Type and Size of Holding Frame (Table 6a-2) 3/8" X 1" flat bar Detention Basin Length to Width Ratio 1 (L/W) Main Basin Side Slopes z = 4.00 (HN) Berm Embankment Side Slopes z = 4.00 (HN) Vegetation X Native Grass Irrigated Turf Grass Other: M ~ KIRKHAM Job number: OA - 02 o-~ i G MICHAEL _ CONSULTING ENGINEERS 56005outh QuebcSteet•Suite200D•Grenwood Village.COSDIII Sheet of Project: ~ t~L 1711 LS- A `F Fib iN A,10 Date: Subject: PONf) N OU47-LET C7P (CP E Designed: kS~ Checked: W FStFQ[ C lop OF PON b z sq-S j',0 POF:B OV(7Pri-0 0 sy37.0 100-Y~ Sue.mU' sy3(o.`iO / i S`13S.70 ~JQ :,uQFACf I Iit r M{C20POa~ ~ ~ ~ I I i I II I I1I ~I 10~ Y~ O(~FiCE; n AN 10 QI ~ _ ~ t C)IAt`!~ I t t I j ~ ~ i 5`i32.53~ I II POND.~OT"PpM7 ~ ~ Sy 31. 35 M t~ /1 KIRKHAM L~vu,,j MICHAEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS 5600 South Quebec Sheet-Suite 200D• Greenwood Village, C060111 Job number: M ' 6 2OZ 17 Sheet of Project: aYLIn( E 5' ? S El L; t,16 NJ Date: 10-16 'O? Subject: 7 i'I )CQ P. Designed: KS~ Checked: I ,vwacv - 0, 16 o,, --pt 1" n15rr~.c~.t., G- lvi SLc)PC- SEE Acct-Eo V ,,s C J bl " 0 - 5 6~ :lh;ac ~ 0, nS l 1 ac-fir i a oO g a G~f _3q 2, q ADO sew I- I ~ C,(s r _ i k' a POPE rf3-pf,,4 I-TV FOREBAY H OUTLET PIPES Worksheet for Circular Channel Project Description Project File h:\020312\drain\pipes.fm2 Worksheet FOREBAY H Flow Element Circular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Full Flow Capacity Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.009 Channel Slope 0.005000 ft/ft Diameter 6.00 in Results Depth 6.0 in Discharge 0.57 cfs Flow Area 0.20 ft' Wetted Perimeter 1.57 ft Top Width 0.00 ft Critical Depth 0.39 ft Percent Full 100.00 Critical Slope 0.005648 ft/ft Velocity 2.92 ft/s Velocity Head 0.13 ft Specific Energy FULL ft Froude Number FULL Maximum Discharge 0.62 cfs Full Flow Capacity 0.57 cfs Full Flow Slope 0.005000 ft/ft 10/17/02 FlowMaster v5.15 08:46:01 AM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 M KIRKHAM Job number: G _ MICHAEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS 5soo5oIhQuebcSneei•suitezoaD•G,ee .dvJlxg,ccsolll Sheet Of Project: S K V L I A/ F- fS797E < F/ I- inl ( # Date: Z Subject: Pac) I"- 0VF-kgDi:1J Designed: Checked: WF_IQ LL H312 ' 8 _ rr~ C = J. V Q= Z r t 00 f. - lov.J j o tOoocf Q = 2x ~z.s ~fS = Gs cis. Asp 22' ln) 12 LC- NGTN Project Name: Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 Project No: M-020312 Date: 06112/03 Design by: KJC Outfall Orifice Size Calculations Urban Drainage Criteria Manual 100-year orifice Desig WQ/DP-G n Point WQ/DP-H Total Area Draining to Design Point (Ac) 5.09 6.02 Allowable 100-YR Release Rate Qioo (cfs) = 5.1 6.0 Depth (ft) (from Centerline of Orifice to 100-Yr WS EI) = 3.8 3.8 100-YR Orifice Opening Cd = 0.65 0.65 Area (ft) = Q / Cd*(2gh)A0/2 = 0.50 0.59 Diameter (in) _ (4*A / PI)Ai112i = 9.6 10.4 Required Diameter (in) = 9.50 10.00 5-year orifice Desig WO/DP-G n Point WQ/DF Total Area Draining to Design Point (Ac) 5.09 6.02 Allowable 5-YR Release Rate Q5 (cfs) = 0.9 1.0 Depth (ft) (from Centerline of Orifice to 5-Yr WS EI) = 3.0 3.0 5-YR Orifice Opening Area (ft) = Q / Cd*(2gh)Ai1/ZI = 0.10 0.11 Diameter (in) _ (4*A / PI)Ac"Zl = 4.2 4.6 Required Diameter (in) = 4.0 4.0 DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 2) STORAGE attempt to account for the effects of the WQCV on all control levels whenever it performs watershed-level drainage and flood control system master plans. 3.2 Sizing of On-Site Detention Facilities 3.2.1 Maximum Allowable Unit Release Rates for On-Site Facilities. The maximum allowable unit release rates per acre for on-site detention facilities for a number of design return periods are listed in Table SO-1. These rates apply unless other rates are recommended in a District-approved master plan. The predominant soil group for the total tributary catchment shall be used for determining the allowable release rates. Multiply the unit rates provided in Table SO-1 by the tributary catchment's area to obtain the actual design release rates in cubic feet per second (cfs). Whenever Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) soil surveys are not available for the portion of a county being studied, extrapolate their types using soil investigations at the site. TABLE SO-1 Recommended Maximum Allowable Unit Flow Release Rates (cfs/acre) of Tributary Catchment Design Return Period NRCS Hydrologic Soil Group (Years) A B C & D 2 0.02 0.03 0.04 5 0.07 0.13 0.17 10 0.13 0.23 0.30 25 0.24 0.41 0.52 50 0.33 0.56 0.68 100 0.50 0.85 1.00 3.2.2 Empirical Equations for the Sizing of On-Site Detention Storaqe Volumes. Urbonas and Glidden (1983), as part of the District's ongoing hydrologic research, conducted studies that evaluated peak storm runoff flows along major drainageways. The following set of empirical equations provided preliminary estimates of on-site detention facility sizing for areas within the District. They are not intended for use when off-site inflows are present or when multi-stage controls are to be used (e.g., 10- and 100- year peak control) at the storage facility. In addition, these equations are not intended to replace detailed hydrologic and flood routing analysis, or even the analysis using the Rational Formula-based FAA method for the sizing of detention storage volumes. The District does not promote the use of these empirical equations. It does not object, however, to their use by local governments who hove adc,.ted them cr want to adopt them as minimum requiremen'.s for the sizing of on-site dc!=ti^n `_r sr-:': catchments within their jurisdiction. If the District N,,n that cc tu,,,, _ 06/2001 SO-8 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 2) STORAGE storage or sizing of on-site detention facilities, those guidelines should be followed instead. The empirical equations are as follows: T. =K;A (SO-1) for the 100-year: (1.781 - 0.002 I2 -3.56) Ktoo = (SO-2) 900 for the 10-year: (0.951-1.90) Kin 000 (SO-3) 1,000 for the 5-year: i K (0.771 - 2.65) (SO-4) 1,000 in which: Vi = required volume where subscript i = 100-, 10- or 5-year storm, as appropriate (acre-feet) K; = empirical volume coefficient where subscript i = 100-, 10- or 5-year storm, as appropriate I = fully developed tributary catchment imperviousness A = tributary catchment area (acres) Design Example 6.1 shows calculations of allowable release rate and storage requirement using empirical equations. 3.2.3 Rational Formula-Based Modified FAA Procedure. The Rational Formula-based Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) (1966) detention sizing method (sometimes referred to as the "FAA Procedure"), as modified by Guo (1999a), provides a reasonable estimate of storage volume requirements for on-site detention facilities. Again, this method provides sizing for one level of peak control only. The method may also be used for initial sizing of detention storage volumes whenever a detailed hydrograph routing design method is used. The input required for this Rational Formula-based FAA volume calculation procedure includes: A = the area of the catchment tributary to the storage facility (acres) 0612001 SO-9 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District STRUCTURAL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 3) 0.50 0.45 0.40 0.35 L U 0.30 L a` 0.25 3 n 0.20 O O.I 3 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 S-42 Extended Detention Basin 40-hour Drain Time Constructed Wetland Basin 24-hour Drain Time 6-hr drain time a = 0.7 12-hr drain time a = 0.8 78il - 24-hr drain time a = 0.9 40-hr drain time a = 1.0 i ) Retention Pond, Porous Pavement j Detention and Porous Landscape Detention _ 12-hour Drain Time 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Total Imperviousness Ratio (i =1,/100) FIGURE EDB-2 Water Quality Capture Volume (WQCV), 801h Percentile Runoff Event 9-1-99 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District Orifice Plate Perforation Sizing Circular Perforation Sizing Chart may be applied to orifice plate or vertical pipe outlet. 1 CO~uF'"',+~ li'/i, ~ h0~f5 l y POND _N soles 2 Cow.mnS ~6 S Al Hole Dia Hole Dio Min. Sc Area per Row (sq in) (in) • (in) (in) n=1 n-2 n=3 1 /4 0.250 1 0.05 0.10 0.15 5/16 0.313 2 0.08 0.15 0.23 3/8 0.375 2 0.11 0.22 a33 7/16 0.438 2 0.15 0.30 0.45 1/2 0.500 2 0.20 0.39 0.59 9/16 0.563 3 0.25 0.50 0.75 5/8 0.625 3 0.31 0.61 0.92 11. 16 0.688 3 _ 0.37 0.74- 1 1.11 3/4 0.750 3 0.44 0.88 1.33 13/16 0.813 3 0.52 1.04 1.56 7/8 0.875 3 0.60 1.20 1.80 15/16 0.938 3 0.69 1.38 2.07 1 1.000 4 0.79 1.57 2.36 1 1/16 1.063 4 0.89 1.77 2.66 1 1/8 1.125 4 0.99 1.99 2.98 1 3/16 1.188 4 1.11 2.22 3.32 1 1/4 1.250 4 1.23 2.45 3.68 1 5/16 1.313 4 1.35 2.71 4.06 1 3/8 1.375 4 1.48 2.97 4.45 1 7/16 1.438 4 _ 1.62 3.25 4.87 1 1/2 1.500 4 1.77 3.53 5.30 1 9/16 1.563 4 1.92 3.83 5.75 1 5/8 1.625 4 2.07 4.15 6.22 1 17 16 1.688 4 2.24 4.47 6.71 1 3/4 1.750 4 2.41 4.81 7.22 1 13/16 1.813 4 2.58 5.16 7.74 1 7/8 1.875 4 2.76 5.52 8.28 1 15/16 1.938 4 2.95 5.90 8.84 2 2.000 4 3.14 6.28 9.42 n = Number of columns of perforations Minimum steel plate thickness 1/4 5/16 3/8 " " Designer may interpolate to the nearest 32nd inch to better match the required area, if desired. Rectangular Perforation Sizing Only one column of rectangular perforations allowed. Rectangular Height = 2 inches Rectangular Width (inches) = Required Area per Row (sq in) 2° Urban Drainage and Flood Control District Drainage Criteria Manual (V.3) nle: Delails.dw9 Rectangular Hole Width Min. Steel Thickness 1 4 6" 1 4 ' 7" 5/32 8" 5/16 " g" 11/32 " 10" 3/8 >10" 1/2 Figure 5 WQCV Outlet Orifice Perforation Sizing Table 6a-1: Standardized WQCV Outlet Design Using 2" Diameter Circular Openings. Minimum Width (W o) of Concrete Opening for a Well-Screen-Type Trash Rack. See Figure 6-a for Explanation of Terms. ?bf, GS G f'f:0 f Maximum Dia. Width of Trash Rack O enin (W,,,,) Per Column of Holes as a Function of Water De th H of Circular Opening (inches) H=2.0' H=3.0' 11=4.0' H=5.0' H=6.0' Maximum Number of Columns < 0.25 3 in. 3 in. 3 in. 3 in. 3 in. 14 < 0.50 3 in. 3 in. 3 in. 3 in. 3 in. 14 _ <6 .75 6 in. 6 in. 6 in. 6 in. 7 1.00 6 in. 9 in. 9 in. 9 in. 9 in. 4 < 1.25 9 in. 12 in. 12 in. 12 in. 15 in. 2 < 1.50 12 in. 15 in. 18 in. 18 in. 18 in. 2 < 1.75 18 in. 21 in. 21 in. 24 in. 24 in. 1 < 2.00 21 in. 24 in. 27 in. 30 in. 30 in. 1 100,40 & >'7 3"x I - 3 ~ PoND N 3 " x 6-" Table 6a-2: Standardized WQCV Outlet Design Using 2" Diameter Circular Openings. US FilterTM Stainless Steel Well-Screen' (or equal) Trash Rack Design Specifications. Max. Width of Opening Screen #93 VEE Wire Slot Opening Support Rod Type Support Rod, On-Center, Spacing Total Screen Thickness Carbon Steel Frame Type 9" 0.139 #156 VEE '/d' 0.31' '/„"x1.0"flat bar 18" 0.139 TE.074"x.50" 1" 0.655 3/a" x 1.0 angle 24" 0.139 TE.074"x.75" 1" 1.03" 1.0" x 1'/2" angle 27" 0.139 TE.074"x.75" 1" 1.03" 1.0" x 1 %2" angle 30" 0.139 TE.074"x1.0" 1" 1.155" 1 '/,"x I'/2" angle 36" 0.139 TE.074"x1.0" 1" 1.155" 1 '/,"x 1'/2" angle 42" 0.139 TE.105"x1.0" 1" 1.155" 1 '4"x 1'/2" angle US Filter, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA DESIGN EXAMPLE: Given: A WQCV outlet with three columns of 5/8 inch (0.625 in) diameter openings. Water Depth H above the lowest opening of 3.5 feet. Find: The dimensions for a well screen trash rack within the mounting frame. Solution: From Table 6a-1 with an outlet opening diameter of 0.75 inches (i.e., rounded up from 5/8 inch actual diameter of the opening) and the Water Depth H = 4 feet (i.e., rounded up from 3.5 feet). The minimum width for each column of openings is 6 inches. Thus, the total width is W ~o = 3.6 = 18 inches. The total height, after adding the 2 feet below the lowest row of openings, and subtracting 2 inches for the flange of the top support channel, is 64 inches. Thus, Trash rack dimensions within the mounting frame = 18 inches wide x 64 inches high From Table 6a-2 select the ordering specifications for an 18", or less, wide opening trash rack using US Filter (or equal) stainless steel well-screen with #93 VEE wire, 0.139" openings between wires, TE .074" x .50" support rods on 1.0" on-center spacing, total rack thickness of 0.655" and'/," x 1.0" welded carbon steel frame. Table 6a l_ Orifice Perforation Details A-,-] WPlate = Wconc. + 6 inches (minimum) Structural Steel Channel W (See below) Formed Into Concrete, To Conc. Span Width Of Structure. See Figures 6-a, 6-b 0101 c, O OI O (o 4" RO No G H„,, Wconc s a O l al to Permanent O W~~~TE = I ~I Water Surface _ 01 1 0-- Z„ - - 2.-4.. J Max. Minimum Circular Openings: Wconc. Obtained From Table 6o-1 Rectangular Openings: Wconc. = (Width of Rectangular Perforation W) + 12" Rectangular Openings: Wopening (see Figure 6-b) Obtained From Table 61b-1 S, see Sc, see figure 5 Figure 5 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 o r°~ o O O O O O O 000 ° 0 0 0 0 0 0° 0000( 0 0 0 000 ° 0 0 0 000 ° ° o 0 0 0 °o 0 0° 0 0 0 000 ° 0 0 0 000 0 o a o 0 0 0 0~ o Example Perforation Patterns Note: The goal in designing the outlet is to minimize the number of columns of perforations that will drain the WQCV in the desired time. Do not, however, increase the diameter of circular perforations or the height of the rectangular perforations beyond 2 inches. Use the allowed perforation shapes and configurations shown above along with Figure 5 to determine the pattern that provides an a rea per row closest to that required without exceeding it. Urban Drainage and Figure 4 Flood Control District Orifice Details for Drainage Criteria Manual (V.3) Draining WQCV File: Detoils.dwg NN APPENDIX H CULVERT AND SWALE DESIGN Melody Homes KM-Job #020312 Skyline Estates ID October2002 Final Drainage Report Appendix Western Swale (Industrial Lot) Worksheet for Trapezoidal Channel Project Description Project File h:\020312\drain\ditch.fm2 Worksheet sky2-swale-trap Flow Element Trapezoidal Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.030 Channel Slope 0.006000 ft/ft Left. Side Slope 4.000000 H : V Right Side Slope 4.000000 H : V Bottom Width 3.00 ft Discharge 19.90 cfs Results Depth 1.01 ft Flow Area 7.08 ft2 Wetted Perimeter 11.31 ft Top Width 11.06 ft Critical Depth 0.79 ft Critical Slope 0.016747 ft/ft Velocity 2.81 ft /s Velocity Head 0.12 ft Specific Energy 1.13 ft Froude Number 0.62 Flow is subcritical. EGT7Of it C4~aAn e 06/26/03 FlowMaster v5.15 02:56:35 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Western Swale (Industrial Lot) Cross Section for Trapezoidal Channel Project Description Project File h:\020312\drain\ditch.fm2 Worksheet sky2-swale-trap Flow Element Trapezoidal Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Section Data Mannings Coefficient 6030 Channel Slope 0.006000 ft/ft Depth 1.01 ft Left Side Slope 4.000000 H : V Right Side Slope 4.000000 H : V Bottom Width 3.00 ft Discharge 19.90 cfs CC -,0f'I L 10Cr) - 0eur 0, CC rO 2.0' CI A~meI fdci`{,t 3.00 ft 06/26/03 02:56:27 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 1.01 ft 1N V H 1 NTS FlowMaster V5.15 Page 1 of 1 ~ II r = • o Z W ~ K W ~ - al UOl3e Q Z 13100 ~j ` Nouv"33 _ m W W i I I iouio! M ¢ W J z i ¢ a f- C C I O J J J la o U N N I W Q W W ° J W ¢ w _ 7 O W j i I 1.. u W > ~ YI 7 W T N Z ' y f 1 V W W C R I J W A • ~e - 39 i 39 V 39 z O W < ~ N y C ~ J I O V ¢ N ~ W J c° iV ~ n _ I L J I W r O p N a W I Q al 17 u a- z r , 31 3 < D N _ C N C = i\ J. Lo , M W r O 6 J 3,3: I U7 W f Z J W W J r^ _ J 8 O O W 1. J¢ W r tll O! ¢ _ O ~ u i ~ s W J° i u ~ _ - J = = C ~ M p ~ W F O ? uW ~ N I^ z r rro 77, 2 I Y of _ ~ p ~ U I N O LZ 9 ¢ 39 N r ~ _ ~ S 3 p cJ r W ~H ~ T O N O r N ~ t~ ( ~ ~ ln l C p N J ❑ ❑ 0; = . Z O W J e Ii YI , u = W O :o r LL 2 O La _ O = Y s i W N C 2 O o c GAF ~ ti~ . S a n G¢ W O ° e W o " a , C V~ O V J O W ¢ S i . U V W u Ji < use==0 v a 'O ~ a T C a zi ` a i r w < ¢ z o c < O o <3 fz C 3 J ¢ ; ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ > o W z3:o~ 240 1 n KIRKHAM MICHAEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS 5690Soulh Quebec Sl.-5.,1e2000 •crrenwood vdlage,CQamn Job number: 0 C) Sheet of Project: CKYLINE F ATE, //v2 Date: (-25-03 Subject: CL-ILVFPT C I~~ i(c/V Designed: TC. Checked: CU L_VEPT n inv .n ~ ? 2.02 inv,00 d. I . ~~anne~ ~l7r~WafPr : x.75 c r ci c'tn C(, J~✓~a r~ E_a~~~ ` K :n,S e p< L FpzOM F,(. Lk Rrz. C (,I - 9 H. - I.Zz Chec k N,~ Hvi, ( 1,2 s.o' F- rc c Q % cbA2- =l CR;-1c d~ = 1.9 C~;7r~ CIKt6,~f~~> E~~f~ rkilnn l1'OPAUL.1 c o= ~(•~~4-2.2 2 Job KIRKHAM number: LX~ MICHAEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS 560DSouth Quebec SOret'Swte2001) •Greenwood VJI,ICOMll Sheet of Project: 'SK ,Q / A/ F - i L i (':i v Date: 7.~ Subject: ~U L V E 2?' C I /~.,J Designed: K I G Checked: Since ~01c¢ Z2' Tw: I ~S' 4 ~sc y = 2-V (Fi~t),re ~LFC61 W = LS Nom, I,s' -r N~ = 2,83' < 3.D' onn. ~qu, Ca-2~ v w L E T <~ti7o Vovtitiet ` of o(< < ~ 01Se~ , y p p ! h!J (V..'.1 J-PG~~n0. Lt/ll{ al e'1 p.(! it Z2 L"Es Tnl S. l c s 3.6- )ot A: G -rt 2 ~N1Y 0✓EF\P"oL./ /;7- (ut_VFRI V t!TPI . lV. f. 1,.. DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 2) ISO 10,000 From BPR 168 8,000 EXAMPLE (1) (2) (3) 156 6,000 0.42 inch.. (3.5 feet) 6. 5,000 0, 120 cfs 5 144 a,ooo Hw' Hw 6• 32 3 000 n fen 5 4' , 11) 2.5 B.8 120 (Y) 2.1 7.4 2,000 (3) 2 7 2 7 4._ 08 . . e0 in foot 96 1,000 800 84 600 500 72 400 3 2. y = 300 yj 6 = Z N K 50 200 F I.5 ? Z / W 0 54 M w 100 Z > 49 ¢ 80 Q - S v 42 ~ 60 It. 50 H ENTRANCE ° ° 0 SCAL 4% "D TYPE w 1.0 f 36 - '"30 (O square edge with 3 w - head.oll .9 33 a " " 20 (2) Groove end with W C 30 headwall x (3) Groove and .8 27 projecting 10 24 8 .7 6 To use.cal. (2) or 13) project 21 5 horizontally to scale ([),than 4 use straight inclined line through 0 ono 0 scale, or reverse as 3 illustrated. .6 18 2 3. CULVERTS 5. 4. 3. 1.5 1.$ 1.0 1.0 .9 .9 .B .8 .6 r .6 IS ~ ~ 1 .5 L .5 L I.O .5 1 1 12 n - _trG~/ FIGURE CU-9 Inlet Control Nomograph-Example 0612001 CU-20 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 2) 2000 1000 600 600 800 300 H W V z 100 W 60- a S v 60 N G F-50 30 z e: f 120 108 96 84 72 66 60 54 V ~ 2 -42 2 36 ¢ 33 W r W 30 27 24 21 IB 10 8 6 5 4 15 12 N H. ly Slep. Sew w i SUlMERGED OUTLET CULVERT FLAWING FULL NW. N. b-LSe For "list Ctum ell wlm.rg". twuuts NW lr wmh"$ MCriMF i. 1M dull" P"Cu" From BPR CULVERTS 1.0 ,0^1, h~ O. O.S i P <fM1 / W W 2 l z SF i 3 300 r Q W 4 300 1.00 5 100 600 6 300 • 8 O Oif 'A 10 20 FIGURE CU-10 Outlet Control Nomograph-Example I vj I 0 L-` ~w = ~.S 4' G,Z - D.ac~ Z,83" 06/2001 CU-21 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District Culvert 3 Headwater Depth Worksheet for Trapezoidal Channel Project Description Project File h:\020312\drain\ditch.fm2 Worksheet Culvert Headwater Flow Element Trapezoidal Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0 .030 Channel Slope 0 .006000 ft/ft Left Side Slope 4 .000000 H : V Right Side Slope 4 .000000 H : V Bottom Width 10 .00 ft Discharge 94 .20 cfs Results Depth 1.48 ft Flow Area 23.59 ft2 Wetted Perimeter 22.21 ft Top Width 21.85 ft Critical Depth 1.19 ft Critical Slope 0.013864 ft/ft Velocity 3.99 fus Velocity Head 0.25 ft Specific Energy 1.73 ft Froude Number 0.68 Flow is subcritical. 06/24/03 FlowMaster v5.15 08:31:17 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Culvert 3 Headwater Depth Cross Section for Trapezoidal Channel Project Description Project File h:\020312\drain\ditch.fm2 Worksheet Culvert Headwater Flow Element Trapezoidal Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Section Data Mannings Coefficient 0.030 Channel Slope 0.006000 ft/ft Depth 1.48 ft Left Side Slope 4.000000 H : V Right Side Slope 4.000000 H : V Bottom Width 10.00 ft Discharge 94.20 cfs 10.00 ft 06/24/03 08:31:37 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 1.48 ft 1~ V H 1 NTS FlowMaster v5.15 Page 1 of i Normal Depth for 30" RCP (Major Storm) Worksheet for Circular Channel Project Description Project File h:\020312\drain\pipes.fm2 Worksheet culvert Flow Element Circular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.013 Channel Slope 0.007800 ft/ft Diameter 30.00 in Discharge 32.00 cfs Results Depth 1.83 ft Flow Area 3.84 ft' Wetted Perimeter 5.12 ft Top Width 2.22 ft Critical Depth 1.93 ft Percent Full 73.03 Critical Slope 0.0068 85 ft/ft Velocity 8.33 fus Velocity Head 1.08 ft Specific Energy 2.90 ft Froude Number 1.12 Maximum Discharge 38.97 cfs Full Flow Capacity 36.22 cfs Full Flow Slope 0.006087 ft/ft Flow is supercritical. 06124/03 FlowMaster v5.15 09:22:40 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Culvert 3 Tailwater Depth Worksheet for Trapezoidal Channel Project Description Project File h:\020312\drain\ditch.fm2 Worksheet Culvert Tailwater Flow Element Trapezoidal Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.030 Channel Slope 0.006000 ft/ft Left Side Slope 4.000000 H : V Right Side Slope 4.000000 H : V Bottom Width 6.00 ft Discharge 94.20 cfs Results Depth 1.75 ft Flow Area 22.83 ft2 Wetted Perimeter 20.46 ft Top Width 20.03 ft Critical Depth 1.44 ft Critical Slope 0.013628 ft/ft Velocity 4.13 ft/s Velocity Head 0.26 ft Specific Energy 2.02 ft Froude Number 0.68 Flow is subcritical. 06/24103 FlowMaster v5.15 08:32:37 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Culvert 3 Tailwater Depth Cross Section for Trapezoidal Channel Project Description Project File h:1020312\drain\ditch.fm2 Worksheet Culvert Tailwater Flow Element Trapezoidal Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Section Data Mannings Coefficient 0.030 Channel Slope 0.006000 ft/ft Depth 1.75 ft Left Side Slope 4.000000 H : V Right Side Slope 4.000000 H : V Bottom Width 6.00 ft Discharge 94.20 cfs 6.00 ft 1.75 ft 1 VD H 1 NTS 06124/03 FlowMaster v5.15 08:32:46 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 O CHART 4 3 dc CANNOT EXCEED TOP OF 0 DISCHARGE-Q-CFS 6 S V V ~04 0 C J J i 2 6 7 H w 6 LL v S S a W O J Q O 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 B00 900 10009 r DISCHARGE-Q-CFS U 14 12 10 6 6 Ec CANNOT EXCEED TOP OF PIPE *3' DISCHARGE-Q-CFS BUREAU OF PUBLIC ROADS JAN. 1964 CRITICAL DEPTH CIRCULAR PIPE I 184 Existing Channel, additional runoff Cross Section for Trapezoidal Channel Project Description Project File h:\020312\drain\ditch.fm2 Worksheet Existing Channel Flow Element Trapezoidal Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Section Data Mannings Coefficient 0.030 Channel Slope 0.005000 Wit Depth 0.96 ft Left Side Slope 5.000000 H : V Right Side Slope 5.000000 H : V Bottom Width 1.00 ft Discharge 12.49 cfs C~RNNEI_ CEPT; - Z.0' 1 C,2€':C WAC41D MINOIZ STORM f mNOFP 0.96 ft 1.00 ft 07/28/03 02:0936 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 1 VD H 1 NTS FlowMaster v5.15 Page 1 of 1 Existing Channel with additional runoff Worksheet for Trapezoidal Channel Project Description Project File h:\020312\drain\ditch.fm2 Worksheet Existing Channel Flow Element Trapezoidal Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.030 Channel Slope 0.005000 ft/ft Left Side Slope 5.000000 H : V Right Side Slope 5.000000 H : V Bottom Width 1.00 ft Discharge 12.49 cfs Depth 0.96 ft Flow Area 5.55 ft2 Wetted Perimeter 10.77 ft Top Width 10.58 ft Critical Depth 0.73 ft Critical Slope 0.018045 ft/ft Velocity 2.25 ft/s Velocity Head 0.08 ft Specific Energy 1.04 ft Froude Number 0.55 Flow is subcritical. M II\j 012 ST~~ ~N0FF -t / 4 07/28/03 FlowMaster v5.15 02:08:37 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Existing Channel, additional runoff Cross Section for Trapezoidal Channel Project Description Project File h:\020312\drain\ditch.fm2 Worksheet Existing Channel Flow Element Trapezoidal Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Section Data Mannings Coefficient 0.030 Channel Slope 0.005000 ft/ft Depth 1.90 ft Left Side Slope 5.000000 H : V Right Side Slope 5.000000 H : V Bottom Width 1.00 ft Discharge 69.14 cfs f. ~ Ya ChA C1 f~^I 1.00 ft tiJ:'h iFF-- G 07/28/03 02:09:20 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 1.90 ft 1 V H 1 NTS FlowMaster v5.15 Page 1 of 1 Existing Channel with additional runoff Worksheet for Trapezoidal Channel Project Description Project File h:\020312\drain\ditch:fm2 Worksheet Existing Channel Flow Element Trapezoidal Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.030 Channel Slope 0.005000 ft/ft Left Side Slope 5.000000 H : V Right Side Slope 5.000000 H : V Bottom Width 1.00 ft Discharge 69.14 cfs Results Depth 1.90 ft Flow Area 20.00 ft' Wetted Perimeter 20.40 It Top Width 20.03 ft Critical Depth 1.54 ft Critical Slope 0.014365 ft/ft Velocity 3.46 ft/s Velocity Head 0.19 ft Specific Energy 2.09 ft Froude Number 0.61 Flow is subcritical. _ I f 07/28/03 FlowMaster v5.15 02:09:26 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury. CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 MN APPENDIX I COLUMBINE BASIN Melody Homes KM-Job #020312 Skyline Estates III October2002 Final Drainage Report Appendix N LL C) NGN L~ O LL Q Z Q F- U) Z O F- Z W U Z O U LL. O W H N O LL 0 O M d E s h z O N > ❑ m U) M O O N n W W F- Q O U Y m W Q J U J Q U Y Q LU W K J Q ~ Z v ~n m m n ~ ~ n ~ rn 2 F- M M M Qj V r N 7 LL ❑ W ° N + a ° m ` E M M M M 7 to ~ J ~ 11 V F to Z _ N Q J= Q~ 0 O 0 ~ 0 M 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O m 6 6 4 6 O Z c O c n O c O N N O N I- J (D (O M n m m W M N Y U 2 0-~ M ~ O M n N ~ r N m m U O F M M M m Qj N m L6 0 H Z a n n ~ ~ n 2 m N N O M J m to to an to N O N wa O O O O O M O > v w a o 0 0 0 o u o O o N m N w J O O O O O O O ~ y N w ° ° o ° 0 0 0 CD rn o 0 o v u~ M m o F J m a m m N Z CO m m N m m N N C~ ❑ M ~.Nj m N v 6 O N Z Q J w~ w a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J ~ Q H O O O O O O O O O O O 2 F UF m N N N V 0 0 N N m m N O O ~ m m m m N m to ~ . M M N m m N U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y U N N W W N W O N m L Q O O m a Q N M O O O N O _ m ❑ ~ 7 N M v Z Y J ~ O X ( c c c c W W X m m m ❑ Ww wW W w W p] O7 CO 07 07 m ~ 00 E O `o C_ M N O p Z LL .N- U N y M C N s 0 co oO E O U c z m a 'o -O, a` m Z W N w N W O ~ N d O N ° W ~ ° ~ 6 W o~ N ° z 20 c H O!~ O V ~ r Y m T T ~ m yN. m co n U 0 o c M N tP O Ip m .n E E 0 0 Y ~ @ 0 ~ N N to N J w a o_ ` O a a Y U) E m o 0 1 M 1 LL V M (UIW) u r' N tP O m O M W m m N N M N O O O N O O ~ J (sd;) co v m o M M R1I30IeA N V a V ~n r Ul M m m m N M N 0A O O O O O O m F 436ua~ r ~ (O O ~ N m O N 16 N a N (ul) ° ° azls adld o v o o 0 M N M W W M m m C a L adolg NO vm o o 0 0 (sbo) mold m o r U6lsap 06 (`+10) uJ O m M 'd mold m co o o r m o~ m tl 1 o o° °o m o V m adol S o ~ s m (s;o) In m m M o 2 p co m O r O r W of LL LL Jy/ul 0 0 0 0 p n v v o z z 1 c'i ni ri ni a 7 (ov) m M IV 7J o N o N c O N F t. E O (UIW) O O O U of V ni O v M a P ni p o a (sio) O r m N N M N N l[J r O ~ O N N y C T 14/ul 0 0 0 0 o O m l N N O M O V D C M ('J M M M M E m m (oe) m m a M co m S Va.7 1() M O ' O 0 O ~ O (O O N T N p , C (UIW) O O O O O W O a n m m r v 3 of ~2 ~2 M v m o ~a~`7 c r r r r N N N j4oun2{ o 0 0 0 0 m o N m 6 ' _N 6 (ov) m o m In o N o easy O O N N M m O m O M M N M ~ y Z N M N O > in w w w w U m m LL v ~ O V r N T p O O O M O m ~ M 0 M 0 M o O In N o m a of ui v E .C E 0 0 o a N N M r m m d ` N O N m 1 p ~ M O O O O T m V O ~ O o ~ C M 'm O p rn r ~ p ~ m O N~ N ~ N 1 0 m ~ L U c tU M M N N U~ N C_ ` ry N m N -Q O O O O m y ~ O N 0 M M t(l N N N d O 10 N N O m O N O O 0 Y ~ O M c_ C C C C N O C C N a C C V IY m m m N y d y d W N m m m m N c A a O) A c a` c A h c 0 a c d 2d L d a v d c A U O 0 Vl O c E O 0 }C G N O C E w 'O O U d Q d d N 3 O LL r E O Q Q T O O 00 Z LL N O N M C . 0 Y 0 o00 E y O c z y m 0 O z W !7 ~ y cn O :3 w O WO it y O N LL O LLI ~ H Q W Q ~QQQZJ 2 z Q Q N Z x K O O U ~ Y m a ~ N O N Y U N O U 0 U 0 0 M N m co U u E 0 0 0 ~ Q m O In O N J w a a ~ j EO a a Y C) C) E ro o 0 ~ M IL V M (u!w) ll cn m o m o M w O M N N M N O O O N O O J ($d/) N V ~fJ l(l N OJ M w Alio OIOA n c0 N m cu) 0 0 0 0 0 o in ~ 416ua'l N c o N m (ul) ° ° az!s ad!d o v o o 0 M N M W M m W LL a / adolg ID U? °o o 0 0 (5)O) mou n O V of u6!saa yMj N N (SIO) Q mold v vMi in N t N (/0) o o ls~ o c° adolS o c m (S;o) °J ~ ~ °o o r o b ci ui ^ 5 LL LL Jy/ul 0 0 0 0 O - O n m n v z I 6 r r 6 0 D (ov) h o o (v o) c i c6 m c6 w c6 c o m . (u!w) o o m m 1 V N O O O N O c M N N 0 a (530) ~ of N Lq N N r N C b r~i c6 v ci v r _ T Y J4/u! 0 ~O 0 N 0 of o to M U a I c6 c6 c6 c6 r o m 0 (02) o v N o M S tl 0 M O O M V n N . ui o 0 0 ,o c _ of c2 m m m `r m o LL ;}a0'J N o N 0 N 0 Y ~ m W ~ N O J40una ° o 0 0 ° o y m .a N (~vJ N M _ ~ ~ eajy O N N I(J M OJ O > O C .N ~ .N T o V1 W W W U W U m m m m t a i U O n O M N f M cV ~ ~ o V OJ N ~ o M M o Q o O 0 .6 n of of ri N ~ n W M m O ~ O m 0 o o 0 m r u ~ o L N In V U o lA ,o n l(l m OJ o o N N :a O O O O O y N N M M N N ry (p ~ O ~ N N O 1 N N O O N O N N O O Y J O M C C C C C C c ~c T _ T > m m LL a w m m m N . KIRKHAM Iv1ICHAEL SURFACE STORAGE AT MILLER S TREET INLEF PROJECT NAME: Skyline Estates Filing #3 DATE: 8/712003 PROJECT NO.: M-020312 DESIGN BY: KJC Existing Miller Street I nlet V= (At'A2)1/2 +A1 +A2 / 3 INCREMENTAL TOTAL TOTAL ELEV. AREA (FT') STAGE (FT) VOLUME (FT') VOLUME (FT') VOLUME (AC-FT) 5427.44 0 0.00 0 0 0.00 5427.50 180 0.06 4 4 0.00 5427,00 380 0.10 27 31 0.00 5427.70 916 0.10 63 94 0.00 542280 1476 0.10 118 212 0.00 5427.90 2528 0.10 198 410 0.01 5428,00 2908 0.10 272 682 0.02 5428.10 3336 0.10 312 994 0.02 5428.20 3940 0.10 363 1357 0.03 5423.30 4500 0.10 422 1779 0.04 5425.40 5000 0.10 475 2254 0.05 542850 5720 0.10 536 2789 0.06 The road is overtopped at a lowpoint j ust north of Ridge Road on Miller Street. The overtopping elevation is apporoxi mately 5428.50. Capacity of Existing Pipe Worksheet for Circular Channel Project Description Project File h:\020312\drain\pipes.fm2 Worksheet capacity Flow Element Circular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Full Flow Capacity Input Data Mannings Coefficien t 0.013 Channel Slope 0.038500 ft/ft Diameter 18.00 in Results Depth 1.50 ft Discharge 20.61 cfs Flow Area 1.77 ft2 Wetted Perimeter 4.71 ft Top Width 0.00 ft Critical Depth 1.47 ft Percent Full 100.00 Critical Slope 0.034535 ft/ft Velocity 11.66 ft/s Velocity Head 2.11 ft Specific Energy FULL ft Froude Number FULL Maximum Discharge 22.17 cfs Full Flow Capacity 20.61 cfs Full Flow Slope 0.038500 ft/ft 08/07103 FlowMaster v5.15 06:10:23 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 ~Y W W ~ J c L) (D ~ Q ii - ~ p v J r"1-. m `o c U) L d _C L T w ` C ~ d X w O 0 u N no o r c o 0 co cC O S N r ~ (J o ' c o ~ O W :i L v- 0 rn - -k- 4 V Q c m U I co j M ~ o £ _ a LO K 14 t9 Q Q A•1 N N o co (V) -'9 4 v W J- 0 o O o O O CD O O co cc V C\j O co c0 V N N (SID) alem Mold v"1 ~ ~ 41 U v (r1 C L~j `9 2 v) O g U LL ~ ~ f J O N ~ 0 N G L O _d CO VL d C a. C L d ~ d O. O d O M c'~ 4 v LJ L+ J ice. ¢ ~ c « o < rr O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O o o O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O N I~ O t(J M N O O co I O 't m N O ~'7 ~ N u O C N N T C p c S G O (A m C ~ 0 3 co L G d U O p U f 4 ~ y M r ~ F W O O U l➢ - (I 0 V 7 n) X rlj (I ~ N y w a J J O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (SID) 0JBa MOB j ,s t- v) al L~ J C.I_ ~ =3 V~ ~ fV w 0 W ¢ Q LL ~ o Q- E L r O m _c N L w p L N 6 c 0 0 d J O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o W 1~ (O N V M N ~ O O) 07 f~ O N ~ M N J o £ ~ O n o ~ C t o co N 4 i ~/1 J S o ~ o o ~ 3 o M M t C 4 O co m fl C U u r, M ° 0 C_ o v O d c o E a- N CO <9 M ~ Ul -i- `9 ~ <y D n ~ ~ U 7 C V~ O M Q 4 ~ ~J N O ~ ~ k 5 N N J ~I- Q; V l~ v lx= bo c L o + o a J J 5 O (533) OIEN mou 1- L') U rry[ U J } 4- LLI Q v Lu ~ Q L o 0 0 C U) Y L L N O d T N ~ O O r n X W O N O III i O O ~I DTI r N O O O O O N O V N O O O N O N (SIO) ales moll O O O (D V N J C. O Ln d C 4 1 c ~ 6 1 ~ 0 o CIO n o rn ~ ~ M C~ o ~ o M s N 4 C C ~ N- M co N v Q ,h 7 M ~r N _ O c N ~ ~ r _ L C_ U m ~ t1 sw r k (~t d v} o v t~, C ¢ r~ Ll. O r _ -r + r~ j J O 1 11111 11\\ n e / \ _ //,I \ ~ sO 1 1 / \ \ O .e 17 11 ' SKYL ES-rWrES y tt t FIONG \1 1 \ 1 \ 1t t 1\ 1 1\ 1 +o a t 11 \ _ 11 1 1 v 1 1 1 1 1 I i 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 \ 11 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 11 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I II 1 1 1 1 II ` I I 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 I I 11 I I I 11 1 ` 1 1 1 II I s I 1 1 1 1 1 11 I 11 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 17, F- 11 V e It II i II II it I ~ Asi ~I DeA IMAGE v AREAS e \ ~i i A -\~sff pW~ II II ~ \ (EOPOSED j AINA6Et 11 It r1 7 x, Ie P I 4 II i •U I W y _ - NOPOSED Por4Ds to wo SCALE Low-Flow Conveyance System Worksheet for Circular Channel Project Description Project File h:\020312\drain\ditch.fm2 Worksheet 24" pipe Flow Element Circular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Full Flow Capacity Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.013 Channel Slope 0.005000 ft/ft Diameter 24.00 in CO -t.t vi E, fE R I Ill AL QESIG^fd Z Flee c, TNCLUGeS {-DQ LAW FL_OVJ ~o rC!! F`fit C>~. Results Depth 2.00 ft Discharge 16.00 cfs Flow Area 3.14 ft2 Wetted Perimeter 6.28 ft Top Width 0.00 ft Critical Depth 1.44 ft Percent Full 100.00 Critical Slope 0.0066 12 ft/ft Velocity 5.09 ft/s Velocity Head 0.40 ft Specific Energy FULL ft Froude Number FULL Maximum Discharge 17.21 cfs Full Flow Capacity 16.00 cfs Full Flow Slope 0.005000 fuft ~FPPc17Y OF llff, C G~5 AN AL,-7T-(2 N/ A7IVG %7 1:11 td( 7 E t Ofyi, "U E C 1 PP C 1 07128/03 FlowMaster v5.15 04:55:47 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Capacity of Low-flow Channel Cross Section for Irregular Channel Project Description Project File h:\020312\drain\ditch.fm2 Worksheet Columbine w/pan Flow Element Irregular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Discharge Section Data Wtd. Mannings Coefficient 0.013 Channel Slope 0.006000 ft/ft Water Surface Elevation -2.50 ft Discharge 17.73 cfs r 0 N W 07/28/03 04:58:00 PM THE pR-opOSEQ Low -FLOol t S~ nn ~2 r; E <J~ t 1A P //t g2-.ilsl r 15 A CONCRETE PAN, l = C~ F C"NNEL HR5 A LAI&F2 /`n-n-n r R V -Id Lr-Af 'T H E PIPE u Y','7 L_ P4 0. -0.5 -1.0 -1.5 -2.0 -2.5 - -3.0 -3.5 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 Station (ft) FlowMaster v5.15 Haeslad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Capacity of Low-Flow Channel Worksheet for Irregular Channel Project Description Project File h:\020312\drain\ditch.fm2 Worksheet Columbine w/pan Flow Element Irregular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Discharge Channel Slope 0.006000 ft/ft Water Surface E levation -2.50 ft Elevation range: -3.25 ft to 0.00 ft. Station (ft) Elevation (ft) Start Station 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 -2.50 10.00 10.00 -3.25 14.00 14.00 -3.25 14.00 -2.50 24.00 0.00 Results Wtd. Mannings Coefficient 0.013 Discharge 17.73 cfs Flow Area 3.00 ft2 Wetted Perimeter 5.50 ft Top Width 4.00 ft Height 0.75 ft Critical Depth -2.35 ft Critical Slope 0.00651 1 ft/ft Velocity 5.91 ft/s Velocity Head 0.54 ft Specific Energy -1.96 ft Froude Number 1.20 Flow is supercritical. End Station Roughness 10.00 0.030 14.00 0.013 24.00 0.030 ~V'C h(~OP'QSFCs C4 A(i/RCL } c A LA(2C,FR (AfAG1-r ' 7, i-AO rte.. / ,,;rl zrt ~cso FgSI E0- TO MR1P4'T IN, 07/28/03 FlowMaster v5.15 04:58:24 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Channel Capacity for Columbine Basin Worksheet for Irregular Channel Project Description Project File h:\020312\drain\ditch.fm2 Worksheet Columbine w/pan Flow Element Irregular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Discharge ~Of-~ann~tNE CAStJ )V,J tT N- L-Ovi - FL-0 v% / C NVAr IV et- NIL 2 Input Data Channel Slope 0.006000 ft/ft Water Surface Elevation -1.00 ft Elevation range: -3.25 ft to 0.00 ft. Station (ft) Elevation (ft) Start Station End Station 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 10.00 -2.50 10.00 14.00 10.00 -3.25 14.00 24.00 14.00 -3.25 14.00 -2.50 24.00 0.00 Results Wtd. Mannings Coefficient 0.015 Discharge 138.58 cfs > ~u r Flow Area 18.00 ft2 Wetted Perimeter 17.87 ft Top Width 16.00 ft Height 2.25 ft Critical Depth -0.76 ft Critical Slope 0.003889 ft/ft Velocity 7.70 ft/s Velocity Head 0.92 ft Specific Energy -0.08 ft Froude Number 1.28 Flow is supercritical. F2EI-BOARD Roughness 0.030 0.013 0.030 07/02/03 FlowMaster v5.15 06:36:51 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Channel Capacity for Columbine Basin Cross Section for Irregular Channel Project Description Project File h:\020312\drain\ditch.fm2 Worksheet Columbine w/pan Flow Element Irregular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Discharge Section Data Wtd. Mannings Coefficient 0.015 Channel Slope 0.006000 ft/ft Water Surface Elevation -1.00 ft Discharge 138.58 cfs 0. -0.5 -1.C w -1.5 C 0 Ej -2.0 -2.5 -3.0 -3.5 0.0 Co L1.t r4 61 It C 611- w I T-I L o-i - Ft-O vJ I~Afq AND PQCBoA~eD i i LolrCrE 0.75 ' oE- PAN P WIDE 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 Station (ft) 07/02/03 FlowMasler v5.15 06:37:06 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 M M KIRKHAM W ~ MICHAEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS 56005oum Q„eN<Sn,,t•5unelaOD.Grreawooavalage COSOIII Job number: 027 ~~-'l Sheet of Project: Srl'L!NE5'iFfT'S ~rLr(VCo ? Date: 7_ 1--03 Subject: C0L_[.IAnRfNF 6-14807-L Designed: Checked: -7kA1.iSrT-,oN Ff~orri 'PA.W 7~j GKAsS-L_,hr✓o (k-Wl N L Q I P - eP,P 0E<fG/✓ r2,P- 2AP ~~i~E V S 0.17 s~ L s V= S = 0,00411-2 6-3 'f ) V= C~Gr,l1PI ,^~~c~C! /YSSuYYL m~ninvArn 2, 5 ?.I/ J2 V S (y, s l)( o. o~; z) G C 3, 3 ( o.6 I. 3t 0EE TYFr_ VL e P- FP,P~ eE I ABLE MD -l0> PIP- RAP e:LA;NkF T :IGKnIC55 - 1.75 x Aso FOR Ti-PE YL, d SLANKE?- T-H'(: V,tj5SS ),75X 0.5 M SE 7TH/(K NESS ~ = 0.03gS d5 - G~AniuLArzt: s 4.iNia; SSE Tt_ftl lr Rundown from Columbine Channel Worksheet for Trapezoidal Channel Project Description Project File h:\020312\drain\ditch.fm2 Worksheet Rundown from Columbine Channel Flow Element Trapezoidal Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.050 Channel Slope 0.006000 ft/ft Left Side Slope 3.000000 H : V Right Side Slope 3.000000 H : V Bottom Width 5.00 ft Discharge 160.00 cfs Results Depth 3.18 ft Flow Area 46.26 ft2 Wetted Perimeter 25.12 ft Top Width 24.09 ft Critical Depth 2.13 ft Critical Slope 0.034580 ft/ft K 4 s Velocity 3.46 ec. ft/s < S.O Velocity Head 0.19 ft Specific Energy 3.37 ft Froude Number 0.44 < 0.80 OK Flow is subcritical. 07/02/03 FlowMaster v5.15 06:04:02 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Rundown from Columbine Channel Cross Section for Trapezoidal Channel Project Description Project File h:\020312\drain\ditch.fm2 Worksheet Rundown from Columbine Channel Flow Element Trapezoidal Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Section Data Mannings Coefficient 0.050 Channel Slope 0.006000 ft/ft Depth 3.18 ft Left Side Slope 3.000000 H : V Right Side Slope 3.000000 H : V Bottom Width 5.00 ft Discharge 160.00 cfs 3.18 ft ►I 1 5.00 ft v H 1 NITS 07/02/03 FlowMaster v5.15 06:04:38 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Q W X14 st - V, 1 } ~A 17 ~J z v° u'~ \~~~v\ ~.vv ~yNXI v \ Y \C \ i\ \\l\ 0, \ \ 4 '\l~ V q v X\ - r „ 1 v r A t ti• ~ ~ a ~ Aj~~p ~ rr' 1 \\"\'i1o~ o . , 1 i a W, j -Z Lo V ~ tV` 0'r j1 \ 1 1 ' i V OL. ` 77 DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1) S = longitudinal channel slope (f /ft) d5o = mean rock size (ft) G, = specific gravity of stone (minimum = 2.50) MAJOR DRAINAGE Note that Equation MD-13 is applicable for sizing riprap for channel lining. This equation is not intended for use in sizing riprap for rundowns or culvert outlet protection. Information on rundowns is provided in Section 7.0 of the HYDRAULIC STRUCTURES chapter of this Manual, and protection downstream of culverts is discussed in Section 7.0 of this chapter, as well as in the HYDRAULIC STRUCTURES chapter, Section 3.0. Table MD-10 shall be used to determine the minimum size of rock type required. Note that rock types for ordinary riprap, including gradation, are presented in Table MD-7 and Figure MD-11. TABLE MD-10 Riprap Requirements for Channel Linings VSo.n (G -10.66 Rock Type < 3.3 VL (d5o = 6 inches) 3.3 to < 4.0 L (d5o = 9 inches) 4.0 to < 4.6 M (d5o = 12 inches) 4.6 to < 5.6 H (d5o = 18 inches) 5.6 to 6.4 VH (d5o = 24 inches) Applicable only for a Froude number of < 0.8 and side slopes no steeper than 2H:1 V. Use G, = 2.5 unless the source of rock and its density are known at time of design. Table MD-10 indicates that rock size does not need to be increased for steeper channel side slopes, provided the side slopes are no steeper than 2H:1 V (District 1982). Rock-lined side slopes steeper than 211:1 V are considered unacceptable under any circumstances because of stability, safety, and maintenance considerations. Proper bedding is required both along the side slopes and the channel bottom for a stable lining. The riprap blanket thickness should be at least 1.75 times do (at least 2.0 times d5o in sandy soils) and should extend up the side slopes at least 1 foot above the design water surface. At the upstream and downstream termination of a riprap lining, the thickness should be increased 50% for at least 3 feet to prevent undercutting. 4.4.2.4 Riprap Toes. Where only the channel sides are to be lined, additional riprap is needed to provide for long-term stability of the lining. In this case, the riprap blanket should extend at least 3 feet below the channel thalweg (invert), and the thickness of the blanket below the existing channel bed 06/2001 MD-64 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1) MAJOR DRAINAGE 4.4.3 Roughness Coefficient. The Manning's roughness coefficient, n, for a riprap-lined channel may be estimated for ordinary riprap using: n = 0.0395dso6 where d5o= the mean stone size in feet. n = ,03', I S) O(~~ Z D n= 0,03°s( O.S) `76` (~.03s (MD-14) This equation does not apply to grouted boulders (n = 0.025 to 0.040) or to very shallow flow (hydraulic radius of less than or equal to 2 times the maximum rock size) where the roughness coefficient will be greater than indicated by the formula. 4.4.4 Bedding Requirements. The long-term stability of riprap erosion protection is strongly influenced by proper bedding conditions. A large percentage of all riprap failures is directly attributable to bedding failures. Properly designed bedding provides a buffer of intermediate-sized material between the channel bed and the riprap to prevent channel particles from leaching through the voids in the riprap. Two types of bedding are in common use: (1) a granular bedding filter and (2) filter fabric. 4.4.4.1 Granular Bedding. Two methods for establishing gradation requirements for granular bedding are described in this section. The first method, a single or a two-layer bedding that uses Type I and II gradations, is shown in Table MD-11 and is adequate for most ordinary riprap and grouted riprap applications. The second utilizes a design procedure developed by Terzaghi, which is referred to as the T-V (Terzaghi-Vicksburg) design (Posey 1960, USACE 1970). The T-V filter criteria establish an optimum bedding gradation for a specific channel soil. The latter requires channel soil information, including a gradation curve, while the Type I and Type II bedding specifications given in Table MD-11 and Figure MD-13 are applicable whether or not soil information is available. TABLE MD-11 Gradation for Granular Bedding Percent Weight by Passing Square-Mesh Sieves U.S. Standard Sieve Size Type I CDOT Sect. 703.01 Type II CDOT Sect. 703.09 Class A 3 inches 90-100 1Y: inches % inches 20-90 'A inches 100 #4 95-100 0-20 #16 45-80 #50 10-30 #100 2-10 #200 0-2 0-3 06/2001 MD-66 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District Eastern Ditch Worksheet for Trapezoidal Channel Project Description Project File h:\020312\drain\ditch.fm2 Worksheet Eastern Ditch Flow Element Trapezoidal Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Discharge Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.030 Channel Slope 0.004200 ft/ft Depth 2.35 ft Left Side Slope 4.000000 H : V Right Side Slope 4.000000 H : V Bottom Width 10.00 ft Results Discharge Flow Area Wetted Perimeter Top Width Critical Depth Critical Slope Velocity Velocity Head Specific Energy Froude Number Flow is subcritical. I t 07/02/03 06:34:00 PM 1- 196.15 cfs 45.59 ftz 29.38 ft 28.80 ft 1.79 ft 0.012423 ft/ft 4.30 fus 0.29 ft 2.64 ft 0.60 ~ ,-Tcc _rO TPAN51 T o d Ppotlt C0ANjUr_-L 7V Ex),sipgI16 T,NLE7- Lf\ST- OF Nl eFf ~f-rv LIKE FlowMaster v5.15 Haestad Methods. Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Eastern Ditch Cross Section for Trapezoidal Channel Project Description Project File h:\020312\drain\ditch.fm2 Worksheet Eastern Ditch Flow Element Trapezoidal Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Discharge Section Data Mannings Coefficient 0.030 Channel Slope 0.004200 ft/ft Depth 2.35 ft Left Side Slope 4.000000 H : V Right Side Slope 4.000000 H : V Bottom Width 10.00 ft Discharge 196.15 cfs 10.00 ft 07/02/03 06:34:09 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 2.35 ft 1 V H 1 NTS FlowMaster v5.15 Page 1 of 1 i 'N - .]55 wE9, •SB T AvE 9.' O ~ravE WEST ' ~,~I- I II II ~ w 08- a( i 1 r!' ra : if ~ '1/.:' WANF MAKCR ;I 13 ~ 16 saw* 1 A_ fJ HRhS~ ■ I •.t t Za l- { _I - -Mount I OW to, 0\~7 A~E_~~ - ssz~ ' O . SO C f'T7'€ • 1 . ~t T -f Sm E e is L ~o sr J6H ~I - :I 7 :I J~ )I N0, a Till L1- 35 . ~~5j. T AYE y o f- WEST t,~ / i •111 J ~--g-~ i- v L' ' - L- - 22 °_21, CL EA/K - - I s - ~ Lam;- - ~ S;w.q SCALE: 1"=2000' MULLER ENGINEERING CO., INC. CONSULTING ENGWEXR.S URBAN DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT - 777 SOUTH WADSWORTH BOULEVARD LAKEWOOD, COLORADO 902-1e CITY OF ARVADA CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE (303) 989-4939 .1• COLUMBINE BASIN OUTFALL SYSTEMS PLANNING i _ '.sAl LYti~ S T r 1 IT 1~ v NEL~ y Berkeley Lake Lake Rhoda O =SHEET NO PLAN SHEET INDEX, BASIN AND EXISTING DRAINAGEWAYS DELINEATION DATE: 7/11/94 DRAWING 2 LEGEND 1 ' I O I SUB-BASIN BOUNDARY 1_ UDSWM2 PC CONVEYANCE ELEMENT ® UDSWM2 PC DETENTION POND u Q (MODELED FOR EXISTING DEVELOPMI ' CONDITIONS BUT NOT FOR FUTURE DEyELOPMENT CONDITIONS) IIA ~ I 41W Its I = t _ - - _ - - _ EST 1 - x _ n _ IL 111 ■ r _ _ y i ~1-~_ bl, _ L' ♦ i ~ 6rtr x'1111 -..102. ' • J , 41 s`; Lf ~c ,._l~-~ , I l $ Z/ 4 _ •J «r .~-r n 1 J 23 -`352 40 ~ A t~ 29 31 (30 25 r 2~ 8 } S?g04~ 1 - 14 -jr 0 X L - ~ • 166 7/.r. O _ W _ • ..,..i .mom - , 18` I'j • - :M~ ~i t- ~?9~ ;'Z~ :~t"~Fm''~ '~f. H y /f ..d ~a _ ~1~~ r - Iii { r 2 - 33 ice,'-.: '_I Mluunc '.22 dI i. s > Q .-~36 O a _ - j I" N T L L 14 19 152 l J\ a.. l r L i 11 y^ , z-. 34),1..~`~ i 16 1-5 i v i - ,~~0 ° I: . ~ 4h~~. V'~~!g 1 I .ti Hh"rlr" 7 I w IIIII. r daw P 1 j 1 aketiil". ~ / p J • :F E~ c" r~l - . Y 7 1 t _ 1' ° 7 a ! / 20 2 21 22 e 0. +r!!aK - r t• n PON16 +c ttl; l , - - POND r- ~w~ (,GuICT`..._-. to A r?- MEAT 141 FEE Scale: 1"=2000' I f 11I URBAN DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT cONSULMG n+cur>ccas 7'77 SOUTH WADSWORTH BOULEVARD LAKEWOOD, COLORADO 9 CITY OF ARVADA CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE i. COLUMBINE BASIN SUB-WATERSHED MAP DRAWING EXISTING CONDITION 3 OUTFALL SYSTEMS PLANNING j LEGEND I SUB-BASIN BOUNDARY j 1G2 UDSWM2 PC CONVEYANCE ELEMENT UDSWM2 PC DETENTION POND (MODELED FOR EXISTING DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS BUT NOT FOR FUTURE ` J~EYELOPME!ff O ITIQN _ - _ Goa PitBjc ti 'U~1106 ~h„ ' -.A02 CJ, y All wr ''152 zas La- wi ~/D * f e.~ - v, + SIBS. zse M .f p w 7 , Se a8e mu1 <nx ~lvt:uv CONSULTING ENGINEERS uv~SSRS . URBAN DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT CGNSU 777 SOUitI WADSWORTH BOULEVARD LAKEWOOD, COLORADO 80216 CITY OF ARVADA CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE (303) 988-4939 COLUMBINE BASIN OUTFALL SYSTEMS PLANNING MATCH TO ARVADA CHANNEL PART A 1155E x\541 L - J J RIDGE ROAD TRIBUTARY E3AsiN LABELS 24 ( 23 24 23 L21 208 206 204 MATCH TO ARVADA CHANNEL r PART B \ Cor4V6YANCE ELEMENT 1 146 1 NIAMSE2s L - - I RIDGE HOME TRIBUTARY URBAN DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT COLUMBINE BASIN RECOMMENDED PLAN FIGURE CITY OF ARVADA CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE OUTFALL SYSTEMS PLANNING CONNECTIVITY DIAGRAM Yl'1d T iae cf Co.._en t r a t i on for CJHP BASIN LENGTH 1.10. (feet) 4 3800 2 34VQ J 2450 4 1600 5 37 C0 6 2550 7 2200 B 43"0 9 3200 r ._J'✓ li 1300 19100 13 2600 14 2210 16 L Z50 977 515510 la, -JIG 19 2730 20 2000 21 2150 22 26Vd 3 ' 00 Y LAC, 25°J 2b 3100 27 44.n.1 ~.~0 9 4 50 JV 17(1; 397 !aJO. 32 !S:rO JJ -V 34 1200 35 1450 36 31010 37 3100 39 6900 39 3400 40 28;0 44 4400 42 55,00 LEND TH 0.720 0.644 0.464 U. 303 0.701 0.493 0;417 0.21, 0.6116 v`.426 10.246 0.:.44 .,2o.'17 0.492 O.`-t,4 0 ,Sr V.?..0 10.70! 0:436 0,0? 0 Y92 0 J93 0.760 Q .625 Q.a~J 0.5562 U.a24 0. '94 0.492 07 0.275 0.581 0.537 1.289 0.644 0.530 0.?5555 1.042 Lca (feet) 2100 1650 1too 900 1600 1500 1000 2000 1000 1100 8100 700 1300 ?5555 1300 1050 J(IOQ 1701. 1250 1000 800 1Co0 900 1000 1100 1200 1401 0 2040 1000, !?no 1000 650 1800 600 600 1000 1200 3400 1800 1600 1860 2300 Lca Tc (tiles) 11.7180+10) (tin) 0.399 31.1 0.313 29.9 0.203 21.6 0.152 18.9 O.-AS J0.6 0.2'84 24.2 0.189 22.2 0.379 33.9 0.!99 27.3 0.208 22.5 0.152 17.2 0.133 20.0 0.240 24.4 - 0.!70 22.2 t. 2J.3 U.t99 23.1 10.`63 38.3 0..22 30.6 0.237 22.3 0.189 it., 0.152 21.'? Q.489 14.4 0.170 21.7 0.!89 20.6 0.208 22.5 0.221 28.3 C. 455 554.+ 0.379 26.7 0.379 34.2 Q. 227 19.4 0.189 20.0 0.123 18.6 0.152 24.4 0.114 16.7 0.144 118.1 0.189 27.2 0.227 27.2 0.644 47.2 0.341 23.9 0.303 25.6 0.341 34.4 0.436 40.6 WEISHTEB BASIN SLOPE CALCLLATI'.'N FOR USE WITH CL'HP CSS/90 BASIN L 1.2 S2 L3 S3 L4 S4 WEIBHM L B. (feet) (ft/ft) (feet) (ft/ft) (feet) (ft /ft) (feet) (ft/ft) SU?PE (ftift) 1 300 O.OQ7 2`_•00 0.t110 4000 0.020 0.01!9 2 700 0.013 2700 0.005 0.0062 J 5500 0.010 21550 0.004 O.VOY5 It 4 300 0.0210 1300 0.007 - MOB, t 5 300 0.012 1000 0.020 200 0.020 2200 0.006 0.00'?3 6 150 0.0io 1600 0.00"97 800 U. 003 O.O 66 7 2200 0.013 0.01:0 t a 2100 0.909 100 0.020 !~VV 0.008 0.6UaS. t 9 100 0.020 900 0.010 1000 O.Vo !2•'.'O V.OLJ o.0!IS It to 1250 0.037 100 0.020 900 MOO 0X0 4. 1300 0.012 0,10 120 too 0.01: !!0o -.0 000 0.010 - O 55!:,6 ! 155 300 " 0.10,05 700 0.)20000 4.0210 4000 0.606 0.0112 t 14 1300 0.020 600 0.020 310 1.010 0.0211 t 45 12010 0.020 750 0.020 900 10.1120 10.0199 It 10 •!VQ .0.0!0 250. v'i'sa 17 200 0.029 550 0.0!)7 4350 0.009 0.0092 18 20 0 0 1 1) 16 350 0 V04 1555555 0.017 , 0OLJ 19 300 - 0.040 300 0.001 900 ' 0.042 800 O.VU9 0 0201 210 350 0.034 1a50 0.016 0.0!SI 2 21 550 0.020 1600 0.0!3 0.0!45 00 0,fj',-7 23 1500 0.035 6(:'55 0.00? 0.0247 2» 5532 5510 005 182 25 250 0 .3J0 10o•✓ 0.`.1» 10,0217 2b 1106 0.012 2200 0•015. 0.Q!8b 27 4400 0.011 O.O1lo 2a 31000 0.00' 0.0070 29 17:0 3.020 !a 50 0.001 800 0.022 4.0134 It 3o 500 0.0255 120-1J 0.009 0.0!!5 31 1800 0.007 0.0067 i 32 300 0.020 900 0.016 .510 0.020 0.04.. 33 2600 0.013 0.0430 34 1200 0.011 0.0!69 35 14`,x0 0.007 0.'55070 36 1900 0.006 1300 0.010 0.0075 37 3100 0.001 0.0070 38 1600 0.006 5200 0.008 0.0075 39 ilo0 0.009 2300 0.008 0.0033 40 2800 0.008 0.0080 41 1400 0.006 400 0.020 2600 0.004 0.0054 42 55oo 0.006 0.0060 2 These basins contained ridge slopes of >51 which sere reduced to 21, in order to sore accurately yodel hydrologic routing conditions. tt The S1 of Basin 22 was decreased to 47 in order to tore accurately model hydrologic routing conditions. COLUMBINE BASIR, NEC JOB 13022 DSC/9 0 COLD NBINE BAS IN, ERG JOB 19022 DE C/30 BASIN LAB DOSES AND TH EIR INPERVIOOSHISS: IIIS TIING BASIN CONDITIONS BASIH LAN DOSES AND THEIR IMPERVIOUSNESS: FUTU RE BASIN CONDITIONS BASIN LANDUSE3 AN D TH EIR INPERVIOUMESS x ID 1ST 1ST 28D 23D 3RD 3RD WT'D BASIN LANDUSIS AN D THEIR INPER VIOOHESS S ' NO I8P A REA INP A REA IN? AREA INP ID ISO 1St END END 3RD 3RD AT D S % % % % % % 8o IN? A REA IMP AREA IMP AREA INP % % % % z z % 1 80.00 25 .20 60 .00 74 .80 0.00 0.00 65.04 2 80.00 26 .84 60 .00 3 .03 42.00 64.13 53.31 1 80 .00 25 .20 60 .00 74.80 0.00 0.OO 65. 04 3 30.00 26 .68 60 .00 73 .32 0.00 0.00 65.34 t 2 80 .00 29 .87 60 .00 8.37 42.00 61.26 54. 35 4 60 00 100 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 60.00 3 80 ."u0 25 .63 60 .00 73,32 0.00 0.00 65. 34 5 . 60.00 71 .78 42 .00 5 .64 30.00 21.58 52.21 4 60 .00 100 .00 0 .00 0.00 0.03 0.00 60, 00 6 60 00 33 35 42 00 66 65 0 00 0.00 48.00 t 5 60 .00 711 .78 42 . D'3 28.22 0.00 0.00 54. 92 7 . 80.00 5 . .69 60 . .00 41 . .63 . 42.00 52.68 51.66 6 60 .80 33 .35 42 .00 66.65 0.00 0.00 43. 00 8 80.00 81 .04 60 .00 3 .41 7.00 15.55 67.97 7 30 .00 5 .63 60 .00 41.63 42.00 52. S8 51. 66 9 42.00 62 .62 80 .00 37 .39 0.00 0.00 56.01 8 80 .00 31 .04 60 .00 3.41 7.00 i5.55 67. 97 10 42.07 100 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 42.00 9 42 .00 62 .62 80 .00 37.38 0.00 0.00 56. 91 I1 00 30 100 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 80.00 10 42 .00 100 .00 0 .00 0.00 0.90 0.10 42. 00 12 . 30 00 100 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 80.00 - 11 80 .00 100 .00 0 .00 0,00 0.00 0.00 80. 01 13 . 80 90 . 100 00 0 .00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 80.00 12 80 ,00 ` :00 .00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80. 00 11 . ?,0.00 S8 . .J3 7 .00 41 .67 0.01 0.00 49.58 13 00 .30 100 .00 0 .00 O.DO 0.00 0.00 80. ,)0 15 7 00 41 73 30 .00 58 .27 0.00 0,00 49.54 214 80 .00 100 .00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60. 00 16 , 7 00 100 . 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 00 0 7.00 !5 7 .00 41 .73 80 .00 .'78.27 0.00 0.00 49. 54 17 . 00 42 . 100 00 0 . ,00 0 . .00 . 0.00 . 0.00 42.00 16 ? .00 100 .00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7. 00 i3 . 7 00 31 . 59 42 00 68 .41 1.00 0.00 30.34 217 42. 00 72 .32 60. 00 21.68 0.00 O.CO 46. 28 13 . 60 10 . ?3 83 42 . .00 21 .11 0 .O0 0.00 56.20 _ 13 7. 00 11 .53 42. 00 63.41 0.00 0.00 30. 34 20 . 00 42 . 85 04 1 .00 14 .36 0.00 0.00 36.76 19 60. 00 78 .89 42. 00 21.11 0.00 0.00 56. 20 21 . 60 42 . !00. 00 0. 00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 42.00 20 42. 00 85 .04 7. 00- 14.36 0.00 0.00 36. 76 ^ . 1 0 uO 41 71 21 42. 00 100 .00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 42. 00 7 1 .10 on 2 42 ;2- 00 9 1 .53 0 . . V A? 23 00 42 36 00 30. 00 63 .37 0. go ' v.30 34.32 2{ . 30 00 . 46 86 7 00 53 i4 0.00 0.00 17.78 23 42. 00 36 .03 30. 00 63.37 0.00 0.00 34. 32 25 . 00 42 . 16. S7 . 7. 00 83. . 33 0.00 0.00 12.83 224 42. 00 6 .13 80. 00 47,01 30.00 46.86 54. 24 16 . ',0 42 ' 4 13 30 00 7 33 00 80 57.98 63. i0 _ 225 30. 00 3 .06 80. 00 43.23 42.00 53.74 58. 05 27 . 00 60 • , , IDO. OO . 0. 00 . 0. 00 . 0.00 0.01 60.00 i76 42. 00 34 .19 60. 00 7.83 30.00 57.93 65. 44 13 , 1 09 i00. 10 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 7.00 27 60. QO 100 .110 D. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60. 08 23 . 00 30 53 03 42. 00 26. 55 T.00 20.36 28.50 123 30. 00 22 .18 7. 00 77,82 0.00 0.00 12. 10 30 . 00 30 . 160 00 0 90 0 00 0.00 0.00 80.00 229 30. 00 20 .37 42. 00 73.63 0.00 0.90 39. 56 31 . 7 00 . $0 00 . 42. 00 . 45. 02 30.00 4.98 23.90 30 80. 00 100 .00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80. 90 32 . 80.00 . 100. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 80.00 231 80. 00 6 .i5 42. 00 73.97 30.00 13.88 42. 96 33 00 80 33 33 7. 00 66. 97 0.00 0.00 31.33 32 30. 00 100 .03 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30. 00 34 , 00 80 . 72 66 7 00 27 34 00 0 0.00 60.04 233 80. 00 100 .00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80. 00 35 . 80 00 . 85 49 . 60. 70 . 14. 51 . 0.00 0.00 77.10 34 80. 00 72. 66 7. 00 27.34 0.00 0.00 60. 04 36 . 00 30 . 23 04 60. 00 76. 96 0.00 0.00 53.09 35 80. 00 85. 43 60, 00 14.51 0,06 0.00 77. 10 37 . . 30 00 . 88 89 42. 00 It. It 0.00 0.00 31.33 x36 42. 00 14. 49 60. 00 85.51 0.00 0.00 57. 39 33 . 00 42 . 23. 29 60. 00 2. 75 80.00 63.96 63.70 137 80. 00 16. 92 60. 00 33.36 42.00 49.72 54. 44 39 . 00 80 100. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 30.00 38 42. 00 28. 29 60. 00 2.75 80.00 68.96 63. 70 40 . 00 42 21. 55 80. 00 41. 31 60.00 37,13 64.39 39 80. 00 100. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80. 00 it . 00 80 2 96 60 30 23. 21 42.00 73.83 47.30 40 42. 00 21_ 55 80. 00 41.32 60.00 37.13 64. 39 42 . 00 80 . 2L 96 60. 00 66. 02 42.00 12,02 62.23 41 80. GD 2. 96 60. 00 23.21 42.00 73.83 47. 30 . . 42 80. 00 21. 96 60. 00 66.02 42.00 12.02 62. 23 =These basins will have a change in land-wse patterns frog the existing conditions COLUMBINE BASIN: OUTFALL SYSTEMS PLANNING CUHP SUB-WATERSHED INPUT PARAMETERS FOR EXISTING CONDITIONS SUB-WATERSHED AREA LENGTH LENGTH T BASIN % WEIGHTED TIME OF CONC. MAX DEP. STORAGE MAX DEP. STORAGE INFILT. HORTON'S EXP. FINAL CENTROID IMPERVIOUS BASIN SLOPE Tc ON PERVIOUS GND. IMPERVIOUS GND. DECAY RATE COEFF. INFILT. ID NO. SO.MI. MILE MILE % FTIF MINUTES INCHES INCHES INIHR RATE/SEC INMR 1 0.16 0.72 0.40 65 0.012 31.1 0.7 02 3 0.0018 0.5 2 0.21 0.64 0.31 54 0.006 28.9 0.7 0.2 3 0.0018 0.5 3 0.13 0.46 0.21 65 0.004 23.6 0.7 0.2 3 0.0018 0.5 4 0.11 0.30 0.15 60 0.009 18.9 0.7 0.2 3 0.0018 0.5 5 0.20 0.70 0.30 52 0.009 30.6 0.7 0.2 3 0.0018 0.5 6 0.08 0.48 0.28 48 0.007 24.2 0.7 0.2 3 0.0018 0.5 7 0.05 0.42 0.19 52 0.013 22.2 0.7 0.2 3 0.0018 0.5 8 0.08 0.81 0,38 68 0.009 33.9 0.7 0.2 3 0.0018 0.5 9 0.09 0.61 0.19 56 0.018 27.8 0.7 0.2 3 0.0018 0.5 10 0.10 0.43 0.21 42 0.021 22.5 0.7 0.2 3 0.0018 0.5 11 0.05 0.25 0.15 80 0.012 17.2 0.7 0.2 3 0.0018 0.5 12 0.10 0.34 0.13 80 0.016 20.0 0.7 0.2 3 0.0018 0.5 13 0.13 0.49 0.25 80 0.011 24.4 0.7 0.2 3 0.0018 0.5 14 0.09 0.42 0.17 50 0.022 22.2 0.7 02 3 0.0018 0.5 15 0.14 0.52 0.25 50 0.020 25.3 0.7 0.2 3 0.0018 0.5 16 0.12 0.45 0.20 7 0.011 23.1 0.7 0.2 3 0.0018 0.5 17 0.08 0.97 0.57 42 0.009 38.3 0.7 0.2 3 0.0018 0.5 18 0.10 0.70 0.32 31 0.021 30.6 0.7 0.2 3 0.0018 0.5 19 0.07 0.44 0.24 56 0.020 22.8 0.7 0.2 3 0.0018 0.5 20 0.08 0.38 0.19 37 0.018 21.1 0.7 0.2 3 0.0018 0.5 21 0.04 0.41 0.15 42 0.014 21.9 0.7 0.2 3 0.0018 0.5 22 0.08 0.49 019 42 0.028 244 0.7 25 0.1 3 0.0018 0.5 26 0.17 0.63 0.23 63 0.019 28.3 0.7 0.2 3 0.0018 0.5 27 0.08 0.83 0.46 60 0.011 34.4 0.7 0.2 3 0.0018 0.5 28 0.12 0.57 0.38 7 0.007 26.7 0.7 0.2 3 0.0018 0.5 29 0.17 0.82 0.38 29 0.013 34.2 0.7 0.2 3 0.0018 0.5 30 0.05 0.32 0.23 80 0.012 19.4 0.7 0.2 3 0.0018 0.5 31 0.18 0.34 0.19 24 0.007 20.0 0.7 0.2 3 0.0018 0.5 32 0.06 0.29 0.12 80 0.018 18.6 0.7 0.2 3 0.0018 0.5 33 0.05 0.49 0.15 31 0.013 24.4 0.7 0.2 3 0.0018 0.5 34 0.01 0.23 0.11 60 0.017 16.7 0.7 0.2 3 0.0018 0.5 35 0.08 0.28 0.11 77 0.007 18.1 0.7 0.2 3 0.0018 0.5 36 0.T4 0.59 0.19 53 0.007 27.2 0.7 0.2 3 0.0018 0.5 37 0.10 0.59 0.23 31 0.007 27.2 0.7 - 0.2 3 0.0018 0.5 38 0.15 1.29 0.64 69 0.007 47.8 0.7 0.2 3 0.0018 0.5 39 0.04 0.64 0.34 80 0.008 28.9 0.7 0.2 3 0.0018 0.5 40 0.17 0.53 0.30 64 0.008 25.6 0.7 0.2 3 0.0018 0.5 41 0.15 0.83 0.34 47 0.005 34.4 0.7 0.2 3 0.0018 0.5 42, 0.18 1.04 0.44 62 0.006 40.6 0.7 02 3 0.0018 0.5 23 0.09 0.40 0.17 34 0.025 217 07 02 3 0.0018 0.5 24 0.09 0.36 0.19 18 0.018 20.6 07 02 3 0.0018 0.5 COLUMBINE BASIN: OUTFALL SYSTEMS PLANNING CUHP SUB-WATERSHED INPUT PARAMETERS FOR FUTURE CONDITIONS SUB-WATERSHED AREA LENGTH LENGTH T BASIN % WEIGHTED TIME OF CONC. MAX DEP. STORAGE MAX DEP. STORAGE INFILT. HORTON'S EXP. FINAL CENTROID IMPERVIOUS BASIN SLOPE Tc ON PERVIOUS GND. IMPERVIOUS GND. DECAY RATE COEFF. INFILT. ID NO. SQ.MI. MILE MILE % (FT/FT) MINUTES INCHES INCHES IN/HR RATE/SEC INMR 1 0.16 0.72 0.40 65 0.012 31.1 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 0.5 2 0.21 0.64 0.31 55 0.006 28.9 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 0.5 3 0.13 0.46 0.21 65 0.004 23.6 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 0.5 4 0.11 0.30 0.15 60 0.009 18.9 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 0.5 5 0.20 0.70 0.30 55 0.009 30.6 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 0.5 6 0.08 0.48 0.28 48 0.007 24.2 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 0.5 7 0.08 0.42 0.19 52 0.013 22.2 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 0.5 8 0.09 0.81 0.38 68 0.009 33.9 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 0.5 9 0.05 0.61 0.19 56 0.018 27.8 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 0.5 10 0.10 0.43 0.21 42 0.021 22.5 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 0.5 11 0.05 0.25 0.15 80 0.012 17.2 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 0.5 12 0.10 0.34 0.13 80 0.016 20.0 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 05 13 0.13 0.49 0.25 80 0.011 24.4 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 0.5 14 0.09 0.42 0.17 80 0.022 22.2 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 0.5 15 0.14 0.52 0.25 50 0.020 25.3 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 0.5 16 0.12 0.45 0.20 7 0.011 23.1 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 0.5 17 0.08 0.97 0.57 47 0.009 38.3 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 0.5 18 0.10 0.70 0.32 31 0.021 30.6 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 0.5 19 0.07 0.44 0.24 56 0.020 22.8 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 0.5 20 0.08 0.38 0.19 37 0.018 21.1 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 0.5 21 0.04 0.41 0.15 42 0.014 21.9 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 0.5 22 0.08 0.49 0.19 42 0.028 24.4 0.35 0.1 23 0.09 0.40 0.17 34 0.025 21.7 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 0.5 24 0.09 0.36 0.19 54 0.018 20.6 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 C.5 25 0.12 0.43 0.21 58 0.022 22.5 .1 . 26 0.17 0.63 0.23 65 0.019 28.3 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 0.5 27 0.08 0.83 0.46 60 0.011 34.4 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 0.5 28 0.12 0.57 0.38 12 0.007 26.7 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 0.5 29 0.17 0.82 0.38 40 0.013 34.2 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 0.5 30 0.05 0.32 0.23 80 0.012 19.4 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 0.5 31 0.18 0.34 0.19 43 0.007 20.0 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 0.5 32 0.06 0.29 0.12 80 0.018 18.6 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 0.5 33 0.05 0.49 0.15 80 0.013 24.4 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 0.5 34 0.01 0.23 0.11 60 0.017 16.7 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 0.5 35 0.08 0.28 0.11 77 0.007 18.1 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 0.5 36 0.14 0.59 0.19 57 0.007 27.2 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 0.5 37 0.10 0.59 0.23 54 0.007 27.2 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 0.5 38 0.15 1.29 0.64 69 0.007 47.8 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 0.5 39 04 0 0.64 0.34 80 0.008 28.9 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 0.5 40 . 0.17 0.53 0.30 64 0.008 25.6 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 0.5 41 0.15 0.83 0.34 47 0.005 34.4 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 0.5 42 0.18 1.04 0.44 62 0.006 40.6 0.35 0.1 3 0.0018 0.5 i I COLUMBINE BASIN: OUTFALL.SYSTEMS PLANNING CUHP EXISTING CONDITIONS OUTPUT SUMMARY FOR THE 2, 5, 10, 50, AND 100-YEAR STORMS 2-YEAR 5-YEAR 10-YEAR 50-YEAR 100-YEAR SUB-WATERSHED RUNOFF PEAK TIME TO RUNOFF PEAK TIME TO RUNOFF PEAK TIME TO RUNOFF PEAK TIME TO RUNOFF PEAK TIME TO ID NO. r FLOW PEAK VOLUME FLOW PEAK VOLUME FLOW PEAK VOLUME FLOW PEAK VOLUME FLOW PEAK cfs in Ac-Ft cfs Min Ac-Ft cfs Min Ac-Ft cis Min Ac-Ft cfs Min 1 102 35 8 152 30 10 182 - 30 16 316 35 20 392 40 2 100 35 8 146 30 11 177 35 18 349 40 23 443 40 3 4 81 35 6 117 30 8 141 30 13 248 40 16 309 40 4 3 69 30 5 101 30 6 121 30 10 218 35 13 269 35 5 - 5 96 30 8 144 30 10 173 30 18 342 40 22 436 40 6 2 32 35 3 46 30 4 58 35 7 122 40 9 155 40 7 1 - 22 30 2 33 30 3 40 _ 30 7 121 40 6 102 40 8 3 36 40 4 52 35 5 63 35 9 125 45 9 137 45 9 2 37 35 3 54 35 5 67 35 4 67 40 10 160 40 10 2 - 37 30 3 55 30 - 4 67 30 8 151 40 10 194 - 40 11 2 39 30 3 57 30 3 67 30 5 106 35 6 128 35 12 4 88 30 6 130 30 7 154 30 11 243 35 13 289 35 13 5 100 35 8 145 30 9 173 30 14 275 35 17 331 40 14 2 40 30 3 59 30 5 71 30 8 146 40 10 185 40 15 3 75 30 5 109 30 7 131 30 12 264 35 15 337 35 16 0 7 30 1 10 30 2 27 40 6 120 40 9 165 40 17 2 19 40 2 28 35 3 37 40 6 83 45 8 106 45 18 2 20 35 2 29 35 3 40 35 7 106 40 9 138 40 19 2 32 35 3 47 30 4 57 30 6 110 40 8 138 40 20 2 27 30 2 39 30 3 49 30 6 117 40 8 152 35 21 1 14 30 1 21 30 2 26 30 3 58 40 4 75 40 22 21 4 30 36 30 3 45 5 6 103 40 A 133 An 23 1 26 30 2 37 30 3 47 30 6 117 40 8 153 35 24 1 14 30 1 20 30 2 32 35 5 107 35 7 148 35 25 1 13 6 35 40 8 35 26 5 119 30 8 171 30 10 204 30 16 359 35 20 445 35 27 2 30 40 3 44 35 4 54 40 7 102 45 9 127 45 28 0 6 30 1 9 30 2 26 40 6 116 40 9 160 40 29 2 27 35 4 39 35 6 56 40 12 151 45 16 199 .45 30 2 46 30 3 68 30 4 80 30 6 127 35 7 151 35 31 2 41 30 3 59 30 5 79 35 12 248 35 16 338 35 32 3 57 30 4 84 30 5 99 30 7 157 35 8 187 35 33 1 11 30 1 16 30 2 22 35 4 57 40 5 75 40 34 0 8 30 1 12 30 1 14 30 1 26 35 2 33 35 35 3 66 30 4 96 30 5 114 30 8 183 35 10 219 35 36 4 60 35 5 86 35 7 107 35 12 211 40 15 266 40 37 2 24 30 2 35 30 4 47 35 8 123 40 10 161 40 38 5 71 40 7 102 40 9 124 40 15 219 45 18 268 45 39 2 28 35 3 41 35 3 49 35 5 80 40 6 96 40 40 6 122 30 8 179 30 10 214 30 17 371 35 21 452 35 41 3 51 35 5 75 35 7 93 35 12 195 40 15 247 40 42 6 86 35, B 126, 35, 11, 153, 35, 17, 277, 40, 21, 340 45 is it i~ i COLUMBINE BASIN: OUTFALL SYSTEMS PLANNING CUHP FUTURE CONDITIONS OUTPUT SUMMARY FOR THE 2, 5, 10, 50, AND 100-YEAR STORMS 2-YEAR 5-YEAR 10-YEAR 50-YEAR 100-YEAR SUB-WATERSHED RUNOFF PEAK TIME TO RUNOFF PEAK TIME TO RUNOFF PEAK TIME TO RUNOFF PEAK TIME TO K RUNOFF VOLUME PEAK FLOW TIME TO PEAK ID NO VOLUME FLOW PEAK VOLUME FLOW PEAK VOLUME FLOW PEAK VOLUME FLOW PEA f i . Ac-Ft cfs in Ac-Ft WS) Min Ac-Ft cfs Min Ac-Ft cfs in Ac-Ft - s c n 6 117 30 9 187 30 12 234 30 18 372 35 21 _ 434 35 1 2 6 120 35 10 206 35 13 256 30 21 423 35 25 503 40 5 92 35 8 147 35 9 181 30 14 287 35 17 337 40 3 78 30 6 129 30 7 163 30 11 261 35 14 309 35 4 4 6 122 30 10 207 30 13 265 30 20 437 35 25 515 35 5 38 35 4 69 35 5 86 35 8 145 35 10 177 40 6 2 2 26 35 3 46 35 3 58 30 8 147 35 9 175 35 - 7 41 35 4 - 65 35 - 6 79 35 9 142 40 11 168 45 8 3 3 44 35 4 74 35 6 92 35 5 79 40 6 95 40 9 44 30 4 84 30 6 111 30 10 191 35 12 230 35 10 3 30 3 65 30 4 78 30 - - 5 116 35 6 137 35 11 2 44 30 7 147 30 8 178 30 12 267 35 14 310 35 12 4 99 30 9 166 30 10 201 30 15 304 35 18 350 35 13 6 111 4 30 6 126 30 7 153 30 11 230 35 13 267 35 14 4 8 30 7 155 30 9 198 30 14 326 35 17 394 35 15 4 86 35 2 60 30 4 86 30 8 173 35 11 219 35 16 1 15 4 48 40 5 60 40 8 104 45 9 128 45 17 2 27 40 57 35 5 74 35 8 135 40 11 166 40 18 2 26 35 4 63 35 4 79 30 7 130 35 8 154 40 19 2 37 35 3 3 67 30 4 88 30 8 154 35 9 187 35 20 2 32 30 2 33 30 2 42 30 4 73 35 5 88 35 21 1 1 17 in 30 3 57 35 4 73 30 7 127 35 9 153 40 1 ) 31 30 3 66 30 4 88 30 8 155 35 10 189 35 23 2 3 53 30 4 91 30 6 116 30 9 191 35 11 226 3 5 24 76 30 6 126 35 8 159 30 13 260 35 15 306 35 25 4 30 9 221 30 12 273 30 18 424 35 21 505 35 26 6 137 4 58 40 5 71 35 8 116 40 10 140 45 27 3 35 40 3 61 30 4 86 30 9 169 35 12 212 35 28 1 19 35 7 119 35 9 152 35 16 267 40 19 326 40 29 4 61 35 77 30 4 93 30 6 139 35 7 163 35 30 2 52 30 4 8 170 30 10 223 30 17 382 35 21 460 35 31 4 89 30 4 95 30 5 115 30 8 171 35 9 200 35 32 3 64 30 3 57 35 4 69 30 6 105 35 7 123 40 33 2 39 35 1 16 30 1 19 30 1 31 35 2 37 35 34 0 9 30 5 110 30 6 134 30 9 201 35 11 237 35 35 3 73 30 7 129 35 9 159 35 14 259 40 17 313 40 36 4 77 35 5 93 35 7 115 35 11 190 40 13 229 40 37 3 54 35 9 127 40 11 154 40 16 246 45 19 294 45 38 6 82 40 3 48 35 4 57 35 5 87 40 6 103 40 39 2 32 35 30 10 221 30 12 276 30 19 437 35 22 513 35 40 6 137 35 7 111 35 9 140 35 14 239 40 17 289 40 41 4 61 100 35 10 163 35 12 201 35 19 324 40 23 385 40 42 6 , i P 3 i I i I i ~I II I I~ t' ii IC 6 4 rr7 I~~ I s1 ~ a COLUMBINE BASIN : OUTFALL SYSTEMS PLANNING SUMMARY OF SWMM OUTPUT FOR THE RECOMMENDED PLAN (cont) 2-YEAR 5-YEAR 10-YEAR 50-YEAR 100-YEA R CONVEYANCE PEAK Stage Storage TIME PEAK Stage Storage TIME PEAK Stage Storage TIME PEAK Stage Storage TIME PEAK Stage Storage TIME ELEMENT ds Ft Ac-Ft Hr Min cfs Ft Ac-Ft Hr Min ds Ft Ac-Ft Hr Min cfs Ft Ac-Ft Hr Min ds Ft Ac-Ft Hr Min 75 374 0 45 658 0 45 819 0 45 1462 0 50 1816 0 50 24 53 0 30 91 0 30 116 0 30 191 0 35 226 0 35 32 64 0 30 95 0 30 115 0 30 171 0 35 200 0 35 -41111, 210 53 0 30 91 0 30 116 0 30 191 0 35 226 0 35 { 61 1 0 30 91 1.1 0 30 110 1.2 0 30 166 1.4 0 35 193 1.5 0 35 .~2 368 2.7 0 50 651 3.7 0 50 808 4.2 0 50 1447 5.6 0 55 1803 6.2 0 55 =3 31 0 30 66 0 30 88 0 30 155 0 35 189 0 35 2'8 40 0.6 0 40 71 0.7 0 40 90 0.8 0 40 156 1.1 0 45 191 1.2 0 45 2:2 30 0 35 57 0 35 73 0 30 127 0 35 153 0 40 '1 44 0 30 65 0 30 78 0 30 116 0 35 137 0 35 2:6 65 0 40 127 0 35 163 0 35 294 0 40 360 n An LO 22 0.1 0 45 44 0.2 0 45 58 0.3 0 40 110 0.4 0 45 137 0.4 0 45 c ls 405 0 45 703 0 50 875 0 45 1570 0 50 1944 0 50 24 66 1.7 0 40 124 2.5 0 40 153 3.5 0 40 160 3.9 1 0 168 4.1 1 5 1-2 59 0 35 119 0 35 154 0 35 281 0 40 347 0 40 116 461 2.7 0 50 804 3.6 0 50 1007 4.1 0 50 , 1724, 5.4 0 55, 2111 6 0 55 1=1 26 0 1.8 1 10 49 0 3.3 1 5 64 0 4.3 1 5 111 0 8 1 10 134 0 10.4 1 15 144 461 0 50 804 0 50 1007 0 50 1724 0 55 2111 0 55 :1 17 0 30 33 0 30 42 0 30 73 0 35 88 0 35 9 23 0 35 39 0 35 48 0 35 79 0 40 95 0 40 1-0 474 2.9 0 55 832 3.9 0 50 1053 4.4 0 50 1809 5.8 0 55 2205 6.4 0 55 :0 32 0 30 67 0 30 88 0 30 154 0 35 187 0 35 - 12 0.2 0 45 25 0.3 0 40 32 0.3 0 40 61 0.4 0 45 76 0.5 0 45 8 46 0 35 73 0 35 89 0 35 142 0 40 168 0 45 1 s 488 0 55 858 0 50 1085 0 50 1865 0 55 2275 0 55 12 40 0 35 83 0 35 108 0 35 198 0 40 244 0 40 137 2 0 2.9 2 25 3 0 4.5 2 25 4 0 5.6 2 25 7 0 8.5 2 20 8 0 10.1 2 15 1=6 486 3 0 55 858 4 0 55 1077 4.5 0 55 1858 6 1 0 2274 6.6 1 0 i , 2 0 5 2 2 15 4 0 4.5 2 15 5 0 6 2 15 15 0 98 1 50 18 0 12.2 1 45 _ 133 487 . 0 55 860 0 55 1080 0 55 1862 1 0 2278 1 0 7 39 0 30 69 0 35 88 0 30 147 0 35 175 0 35 1? 485 2.2 0 55 862 2.7 0 55 1085 3 0 55 1874 3.7 1 0 2295 4 1 0 130 502 0 55 891 0 55 1121 0 55 1939 1 0 2380 1 0 129 425 0 17.2 1 15 841 0 19.2 1 5 1092 0 20.3 1 0 1906 0 23.8 1 0 2343 0 25.6 1 5 18 26 0 35 57 0 35 74 0 35 135 0 40 166 0 40 123 434 2.7 1 15 852 3.9 1 5 1112 4.5 1 0 1915 5.9 1 5 2360, 6.6 1 5 17 27 0 40 48 0 40 60 0 40 104 0 45 128 0 45 1:4 18 0.3 0 50 41 0.5 0 45 56 0.6 0 45 112 0.8 0 50 142 0.9 0 50 5 122 0 30 207 0 30 265 0 30 437 0 35 515 0 35 6 38 0 35 69 0 35 86 0 35 145 0 35 177 0 40 T_6 434 1 15 852 1 5 1112 1 0 1915 1 5 2360 1 5 1.7 42 0 45 85 0 40 112 0 40 212 0 45 263 0 45 118 122 0 30 207 0 30 265 0 30 437 0 35 515 0 35 19 37 0 35 63 0 35 79 0 30 130 0 35 154 0 40 124 444 1 15 875 1 5 1146 1 0 1977 , 1 5 2444 1 5 190 30 0 7 1 10 63 1 1 -0 85 1.1 1 0 169 1.4 1 5 216, 1.6 1 5 1 16 91 . 0.8 0 40 164 1 0 40 207 1.2 0 40 3591 1.6 1 0 45 440 1.7 0 45 60' LIMIT OF EJOSTNG ROW a0' ROW REQUIRED OwO aI~ I IR OP ( VAP N VARI~ I~ 4' FLAT BOTTOM r ""T OF LCI PAVEMENT /dl 4' FLAT BOTTOM RCP OW FLOW CONVEYANCE RIDGE ROAD TRIBUTARY TYPICAL GRASS-LINED CHANNEL CROSS SECTION STA. 30+80 TO 43+00 ORIGINAL SCALE: 1b20' HORIZ. 1-=10' VERT. Z4 RCP (LOW FLOW CONVEYANCE SYSTEM) RIDGE HOME TRIBUTARY TYPICAL GRASS-LINED CHANNEL CROSS SECTION ORIGINAL SCALE: I-=20' HORIZ. I 10' VERT. rent-nsEp (Am- _'SeG7?Qq LOCATIONS, 48 FRpM >TA n..0 TO 61.90 LROM STA i -10 TO ®.W iRtL Si.~ IJ. JO 'O 2I.B0 .I . - hiP CONCRETE- TRICKLE CHANNEL DETAIL ORiGINAI SCALE: 1'=y A MINIMUM A ZT, 5' MINIMUM 8 12' ACCESS ROAD MINIMUM _Q L12 1' MINIMUM ° IF^2' MINIMUM *SEE PROFILE FOR TYPE OF LOW ROW L4' CONVEYANCE SYSTEM 4. ARVADA CHANNEL AND RIDGE ROAD TRIBUTARY TYPICAL GRASS-LINED CHANNEL CROSS SECTION STA. 0+90 TO 29+00 ORIGINAL SCALE: 1'-20' HORIZ. 1--10• VERT, ROW ACQUISITION TABLE °RW'O wsluw • STREAy R6Ap1 'KKK ROW OETH OF LYGVAiION MINIMUM wlOtll Raw °ARVAD_ CI-{gNNEI- ~OVP~O ALLISON TO CARR Y 1 CARR TO CODY 9 74• 7$ CODY TO DOVER N 11' 74' 75' DOVER TO PON01 N ' 12' 80• 90• POND? TO GARRISON N 91 62' 6$' GARRISON TO INDEPENDENCE Y 9' . 74' - 0• KIPLING TO MILLER y 9 74, 75 MILLER TO OAK Y 13' 96' 100' OAK TO PARFEi Y il' e6' 9D' °RIDGE ROAD TRIBUTARY Y 10, 80 eo STA. 0+90 TO STA. 6+90 N 7' . STA. 6+90 TO STA. 12+50 Y • 50 6C' STA. 13+30 TO STA 29+00 Y 10 • eo• ao• 10 90' TYPICAL CHANNEL SECTIONS MUZLER ENGINEERING CO. INC. AE worvc.rz svrre loo S. W,U)wom BLY `°"g° T° AN DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT B, LAKf.ooo, coLnaAOO eoua Y OF ARVADA OJECT N0. 9022 9 _41109 CITY OF WHEAT RODE LoP~w Pacl,.~~ NO, Do- 00 00 EXTEND WINGWALLS AS REQUIRED TYPICAL PLAN LAYOUT ORIGINAL SCALE: 1-=20' VARIES I VARIES (5' MINIMUM) MINIMUM) 3 SIDED CONCRETE CHANNEL _ SECTION A-A ARVADA CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT AT TRANSMISSION TOWER DETAILS ORIGINAL SCALE: 1"=20• HORIZ. 1'=10' VERT. NOTE: DESIGN OF ARVADA CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS AT THE PSCO TRANSMISSION TOWERS IS SCHEMATIC ONLY. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN, REFINEMENTS TO LAYOUT OF STRUCTURE. WINGwALLS AND RELATED GRADING, AND ADDITIONAL HYDRAULIC DESIGN IS REQUIRED DURING FINAL DESIGN. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS COLUMBIAi_ BASIN OUTFALL SYSTpNS PLANNING TYPICAL CHANNEL DRAWING SECTIONS AND 8 MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS it { COMMENTARY ON SHEET 3 No existing facilities are located on Sheet 3. The recommended improvements include portions of the Ridge Home and Ridge Road Tributaries. The upstream portion of Ridge Home Tributary grass-lined channel is shown on Sheet 3. One private drive will require a culvert crossing near Sta. 31+00. A 35-foot wide strip of ROW will need to be acquired along the portion of open charnel improvements. Other portions of the Ridge Home Tributary are shown on Sheets 5 and 6. The portion of the Ridge Road Tributary shown on Sheet 3 includes approximately 1500 linear feet of grass lined channel, one culvert crossing and approximately 2200 linear feet of storm sewer. The culvert crossing is required to route flows under the railroad tracks and Ridge Road. The open channel is located between Sta. 25+50 and Sta. 43+00. An access road is recommended to be constructed alongside the open channel located to the south of Ridge Road. An 80-foot wide strip of ROW acquisition is required for this portion of the open channel system. The open channel system upstream of the crossing also requires an 80-foot wide strip of ROW acquisition. The storm sewer system extends further west from the end of the open channel. The sizes of the storm sewer main shown on this plan sheet range from 84-inch to 72-inch. The design flow rates range from 512 cfs to 363 cfs along the portion of the Ridge Road Tributary shown on Sheet 3. GENERAL NOT 1.) MIS OVIFALL PLANNNG pOCWENT G DINCSYIWL ONLY. ME oUTTML SYSTEM SIO" P OES A MOOR ORMNAGE NE'TMORK MTtHIN ME PROTECT SOLMSAM. LOCAL WTEKEPTDRS WILL BE REOUREO TO SERE TRIBUTARY AREAS UPSTREAM OF MG ADJACENT TO ME PROPOSED OUTTALL SSTEM. ML FEATURES S40wN U(CHANNELS. NOTED OGES~ SEWERS. OOEMOON PONOS, ETC) ARE PROPOSED NLESS AS uTuTIES SOw'rl ARE BASED ON NFORWIOm SUPPLED BY LOCAL DOKRN M ANA uDUTr COMPANIES. PLAN ';R.w LOcATO ARE APPROWIMATE. ME ELEVATORS OF ALL UOUOES SOMN ARE BASED ON TTPYJL MER DEMN% OR AS INDICATED BY VERTICAL OATA FRONDED. VERIFICATION OF URLfM1 L O TO, AND OEM G NECESSARY MCR TO NNL OESIGN OF MESE MASTER PLANNED FACILITIES. O-) ALL ELEVATORS S N PLFR AND PROFILE ARE BASED ON A OATUM LVABUSNEO FOR MIS PROTECT tuPCNO A.) INLET LOCADMS ME SONN AT SCNEYATIC LOCAnONS ONLY. FORMER - JR&SOCAOM IS REp1RED. - 3.) CN-STTE OEIENOCN IS RECCMINNDEO FOR DEVELOPMENTS TRWARY TO ME MNAOA CHANNEL LOCAL JUR® IOAS ARE RESPOH98lE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF ON-ME . OETEMON FOR NEW DEVELOPMENTS, r reel - \ Y o- Ykrrad h L-% f - _ J ,•T t 1 r''tL e~~ ' N / ( Vii. ~L' - i- - `i - ~ : F ca T 1 _ ,I A~ 40 - , tJnincor orated efferson Count m-~' x~`_I V Y ~Z:h' j^ .V -w.. p rT i. -_'i 1•~1z`'~1 r! i P I:IL y.rV8d8- - LPL /Iy~~~• --lr a~,.r F 1 r ALA I ".l TEibuTY F. . -"4 HOn' • STA 30.00 TO 42+00 - - < EIQ9 I • T-. 35' Row / i I 1- '1'T GRASS-LINED CHANNEL r ' -L. 1 i 1 C~ - ®o.3,SG 6:•ISOh _ - II •n- _i * _ / - - Lf A I I•GAS TO BE \ _ TE 1 _ % r1 I ~ I r / L .-.r 1 I OW :'ELOC.A v CItY Of W'r?eaY Rldge - / 11 f i : y`1 it BRE°ouIRED I- 4TA -1290- 33+90 Ft• t P x' - - _ j o )1`.~.,-. yl®Il kNEI-:CAF -EO CEfAW1¢l / J,~ STA' '90'Ta- $s p 'COy-f3TCIV T • Oo IFFF-ACE + t50 1F RCP (&o.9A i,. , ° ♦ E •>-.il _ - oa. TtibU48_ _ ` : B A 1o•s0 iD i1 ♦M/. t 1_i I: Il. / ",F = - 0 PROVIDE --K ~O.Ni'. - . L V : fo now Rl B _ sTA 13 +90 L~lO, L ~ ~7 v.. `i n AEOVIRED, - T ,T) LESS fjiA33.LINEO'CMANN[L D T1 T:' /T-dpss o «sfxr• 1 r d L i p v' • ~~'SSS = _ J'/" ~taE Z71 MATCH 7100,` MAT -LINE SEE SHEET < _ r LINE.. .z- • 400 SHEET rAI+ <.r;- t••t - ; ~.'T. r,j..._ I I1 A rC 1 Ile w 10 Iwo "I'*' • A NoM upc.LO elluu• P • A Mou+ ~eNAL FuwMUIuAL ..,o . ,•r• LER ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. I.P.NTOUPAPPP TIp•.1"01A+M....«9 URBAN DRAINAGE AND FLOOD PLAN .r• ILR«,.: v.Irw wA«, , CONTROL DISTRICT C OR awr•c I .1 wpr m sOVTH wC,LODSwORTH NSUIRTN: BOInAVFNCINEEASAAD eae FOUTFOALLL UMBINE BASIN 9 •LL w•.r19,• A+e Me AM LLA L•m DATUM."ODp•CO1-o"'`OO CITY OF ARVADA CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE InB1 Bee-Fw9 JHK . • a TFI• MAP CONPLAS MIl„AP9..LL MAP ACCPIACT SMP. AAf , I. - SYSTEM PLANNING P•o A•pT ••.9022 LAM CONTRACT-110.90.05.08 3 .1116 COMMENTARY ON SHEET 5 The only existing stormwater routing facility shown on Sheet 5 is the upper portions of the South Kipling Lateral. The lower portion of this system is shown on Sheet 4. The two proposed systems that have portions shown on this plan sheet are the Clear Creek North Outfall and the Ridge Home Tributary. The portion of Clear Creek North Tributary shown is the upstream portion of the system. A short segment of 20-foot wide ROW acquisition will be required to implement the construction of this portion of the system. Additional comments regarding the Clear Creek North Tributary system are described in the Comments r for Sheet y s7and9. The upstream portions of the Ridge Home Storm sewer system is shown on Sheet 5. The beginning of the open channel portion of this tributary is also shown on Sheet 5. A 35-foot strip of ROW will need to be acquired for the open channel system. The design flow rates for this portion of the tributary is 127 cfs. The !upstream portions of the open channel are shown on Sheet 3 and the lower portions of the storm sewer system are shown on 4. I• GENERAL NOTES 1.) THIS OIXALL PI NRG DOCUMENT IS CONCOMI ONLT. ME DUT SYSTEM SND,N P OES A IAA,IOR CRNNACE NETWORK IRTMN ME PRO.IECT KIRAARY. LIX MEACEPTORS NILl BE REWIRED TO SERVE TRIBUTARY AREAS LVSIRFIY Cf AND ADYLEM TO ME PROPOSED OUTFAU SYSTEM. AEI. MATURES SHOWN ' (CNANat BRIDGES. STORY SEMERS. OEIQ(IgN PONDS. ETC.) ARE PROPOSED UNLESS NOTED AS EXIBi1NG. 2.) UDUTICS SHOWN ME BASED ON :NFORWMN SIPPUED Br LOCAL CaVINUENIS AND M rr cOMPANRS. " N L IIDNS ARE MPROXIWTE THE ElaACCHS r aF All UnUttES SNONN ARE BASED ON TYPICAL Cava DEPMS. OR At INDICATED j W w DATA PRO.IDED. wnnaTroN of rmLnr T ODN uu DEPM.IS NECESVR( PRIOR TO MV W. DESIGN OF THESE TLtS'IER P NED FK1RIE5_ D.) ALL EIFVATNRHS SNONN IN PIAYI AND PROFILE ARE BASED W A OARAI ESTAHJSfED FOR n6 i`i IER N P,Nc. - A.) ORET LO MNS ME SNONN AT SCNEIIAW LOCATIONS OWY. FVRRER IMEST"TION IS REWIRED. S.) ON-SITE CEIENTION IS RECONMENIR21- M OEVELOPUE TRIG MY M DE ARIMA CHMI,EL LOVW .AIRGCI000HS ME RESPONSBEE FOR IMPWIENTATION OF ON-SRE OEIENOCN FOR NEW DEVELOPMENTS.- (I I--Z Ez ra ed _ f `J<~~ ~ t~: I K' T ~ ~ t .r-A ~ `t 1` ` w ~~z 1-. r _ ._.1 1- 7 .4~ _ ~tL/' ~Ti r - I / g.~ \ v"t t ri 'C/~,,-.I 1 \ ~.1 ~ ❑ - 'l-:~r ~ ~ ).1 'A \ ~ ib~C~ 1• 1. `l~V~ f \i =J ` ~ ~ _ iC i I ~`r f t._-/I~ 'rte' \ '~"--.T t_ _ Z" f ,r_ -1- - \ . ~ - JLI) L I T `L,~.~ r' ~r • F_.s" ~d_ SAL •C. ' L..,.~ ✓ f _I I r 'S / ` ~JL I' J c ti -.x - \ ( r. _ l1 f3-mom i --1-! I q L . cl~l - :.l - 'J..: _ _ ~ I' _I I i-~ •4 _ (-I ~ ~ ~ V.:_. ^ L. . L _ ~ ~ I ~I L~1 1;11 1 41 -:V Y" } I ..1-j. ~•;1. 1 - ' tel. 11 > ,1. .qA - ( 1{ I~ i~;. ~I-'ItI.. I -J rY PI ! ti Il ;.R = -'i / - '✓_".~;'-bltY.af Arvada1< I!-r., rM`b r .l 1 ry ~/c~ _ L Ir IJ \ W Il 1 .r - 1\ - ``i a l- 1' I~ I Z f G ~_:c r. y ~j 1 top 'I n o•->a.-•- N x.162 rtxteud ,r (r i w alftheairld - S`; G ) ~l _ , - _ Eoccza eB x t..: A i.•. (ZIl "IJ- EI$en4eAt , L i . L J ! o - r 1 .1 I-:'-1 is~l ~ t.~' h A _ r I - - ! 1 I rY tti aorta YYY _ / 3 Ir r~ 1 I ,~LJ I rr I f._t ` r1--' I l I - ~a•...~: ^L _ I lt Q t r I : I T `~1 j, Paz. CrEe -I C r s C L t(.- \ I ~1 lie i `ate -r4 I l 'I 1 . r ~ _t -i_ t . 'I- I 1 ' ~ ~ ;4~ ' ~ _ - - i l_J STA 22. OfO OO*BO / r-- /I GRASONLWAcHA o .L T :y r ~-a. a r- _ - ^ \I __4_. A _~-.T-*"-~! - - Te ®0.505 "O<ap=42ZtIa cj~ ;Zf ~Al zo 00 r J ,-`I :..Cr r odsvT, " ;l q~^ /l _ , ',l (1~~~ tt~ J«' ti f r MrnEo 1C r f' r - j41 tr -I/ 7 ;;tTA' ♦ f it / lay_ -LR- l..l 'L ~F'~- 1r, `a_ ~~F. =TZ~aP.~ 1 - ✓ ~uII U =f I~ i Imo: _tL) .:I Q' ~r (.r L kit sir ~17•' It _L'~~_~I~~("{{s 1LjI( _ J / r)' 111 1 _ 1=_L.~. 1 y,.l l~-i- '~.i•L_<' n.~'7 i_~-•:'ly'I ' <.._y fr;~ .gyp eft 4~ , ,E~2 x. r°{ :l 11 1 t t -...1 .;i Ii._ '.n '"hI:;..r.:=.I ~ :a;F~-::L j.:•~,• l/rf~r /~jF _ ~ - - -.':•I. ~a~ ~.II~~.~ ~ .Lfi_ -=_u 9'1±4., 1'=- ~ - -r a - - -F?,,. D- / ` ` G•r" . ..1 bs' '{L` - DF~t I r r ~ ~~rl ;c~•7•a'-~ ~ / • ~ ~ - i 1 n~ !'-I. - / C a.- ~'1 L r I G-.'~ I _ ~_n. - ~ `a' if` i ~t T~$'E_BUILT~HS~-_.. it - ~~~,I. ~-II ~ . `.,~1!'. H I: t7~ L't -Y: 1 ~r~..A,~ rZ 1 f n~Iti G [I '_-?~i::.->~ ~ ./p •lP',/ JufQ- ^rj~ INIIY.W_ 1' I ~ (L LI' :.L- . . ~ _ ~ _ ,'I , T,A r• ~ . ~ rti ---->h>~- 4r7 rL;r v ; ~~c' sL Irh ) ; - ~ ~ G'.. - I, ~5: / G(I r. + -LT F' -I (.'"'.n,-~ I r'n"•, L G.% Y4~~~, - l~s~r l: I - ' ~ ~.,e r~p-'r -`y' , L_),~r r m.~.n W ~dY~T,I'1 EE~MEYU:r / - .PUw,' I n I I I ;.(•i . E~Z' .yf ``7 ~I !`r F oo~.iCi ' --L'~}' 7_' 1 / r fJi LJI. - ` (1 1',' .ea:~"rwuiouiA/. i ':P<°YA: UYPYA.. w: .AC:(.`...IAL,.Aa., MULLER ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC °40"0 ` y' 1' f./ / ?c ^ "r 1 1 1111 i•~1`~ L roroa..,„rO WA o, „u.a •OR.nu <RW CON TOM"""".AL,9•o,T SILTTNGFNCINEERS ens URBAN DRAINAGE AND FLOOD PLAN P.T..LP...: CONTROL DISTRICT COLUMBINE BASIN ALL a VATWAS A., "A. uA Lau oAmN. E-ui'A'OOO• COLORADO evil " ,m (wTK CITY OF ARVADA. CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE S uaJH .IC ,.R.9Cr ...9022 LUTFAI 11 SVRTFM 01 nAUUar ~"°T I III - - - 8+00 0+00 16+00 12+00 8+00 4+ 72+00 4+00 16+00 i r - - I r - r I r r 1 = 12+00 8+00 i+00 0+00 - 28+00 24+00 20+00 16+00 - 32+00 oESc x ErrcmEExrrrc co. iNC. " BAB URBAN DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT COLUI~BP~ BASIN Ow.wN consc,.TU+c errcmzET++<t rxc c.rE sulre .0c NAM CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE ; s. w 0swoRT 80I~. OUT-FALL SYSTEMS PLANNING CITY OF ARVADA {Ap"F.w000..... DO 0022E 01ECrc 13031 ee8,930 LAM LDFcD PRO.ECT No. 80"00.00 Pa0TNo. 9022 ~ W. WTE RE~+40vS RDOE HOW TR6UTARY STA 0+00 TO STA 33+56 OLD WADSWOart+ BLVD LATERAL STA 0+00 TO STA 14+60 WAPD ROAD LATERAL STA 0+00 TO STA 15+60 Df .w 21 or 16 1 12M APPENDIX J RIDGE ROAD Melody Homes KM-Job #020312 Skyline Estates 111 October2002 Final Drainage Report Appendix d a Q z Q at co 0 0 01 W Q W- G aP k.25 " - 1>ESt(oN FOINTs W0 Ridge Road Capacity Worksheet for Irregular Channel Project Description Project File h:\020312\drain\streets.fm2 Worksheet Ridge Road Flow Element Irregular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Discharge Input Data Channel Slope Water Surface Elevation Elevation range: -0.50 ft to 0.07 ft. Station (ft) Elevation (ft) 0.00 0.00 0.38 -0.01 0.50 -0.50 2.50 -0.33 22.50 0.07 0.005000 ft/ft 0.00 ft Start Station End Station Roughness 0.00 22.50 0.013 Results Wtd. Mannings Coefficient 0.013 Discharge 9.55 cfs Flow Area 3.62 ft' Wetted Perimeter 19.42 ft Top Width 19.03 ft Height 0.50 ft Critical Depth 0.01 ft Critical Slope 0.004362 fUft Velocity 2.64 ft/s Velocity Head 0.11 ft Specific Energy 0.11 ft Froude Number 1.07 Flow is supercritical. Water elevation exceeds lowest end station by 0.00 ft. "`ICI LI I CF.s r. F Rz7H0 - sP•1Fs7~ (~o"-n+ of SKYLIldE PLC"7 ZS Cry Qi oo - Q5 ; 0, (0Z Cfs gA51nl D O cf- s Q ioo Q, - 0:7s Cfs "-E Fal-r-.rvuIy Z- f-av H\'OROLOC;' Ca4CwLNnoNS 06/25/03 FlowMaster v5.15 01:53:34 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Ridge Road Capacity Cross Section for Irregular Channel Project Description Project File h:\020312\drain\streets.fm2 Worksheet Ridge Road Flow Element Irregular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Discharge too = ?.ql cis Q~ i. -20 cT Section Data Wtd. Mannings Coefficient 0.013 Channel Slope 0.005000 ft/ft Water Surface Elevation 0.00 ft Discharge 9.55 cfs -0.6938893! c 0 a~ W I.~JOV TU OF ~SKYLI Jr_ FL6.2) too ' E , r S ifs - SIn( U owo = 1.6e crs 06/25/03 FlowMaster v5.15 01:53:21 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 V 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 Station (ft) N KIRKHAM M MICHAEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS 5600 South QuebecSheet•Swte 200 D- Greenwood Village, CO 80111 Job number: Sheet of Project: = C 1'L !N( E a -ES F Lfrd (g A10. Date: - Z - 03 Subject: Y2106E eQA 1L fJLE= Designed: Checked: INLET N AAJL9 _AL6E r`7i 4 -w?st SWAP~rnEPTlJ f~.z fioR 1N~P7's DEsIC,Al )n/Lf i I~ 61pT-,;f2e /IIIrVL; S' tcf"'1 ~CI1.N.L._r"v__.F1_._4v1 (As5LAWN6 UJi+Egr PI[)&E TAjVDgf2D (CFIPgC 17 = copacO-" 01~ OrAf f';`? v ~ y -!-NCET 0 iS) A a re a C2 I I w/ eq r' 0 c i~c7fJ ~'Ct C_ ha ^ - c4 'S z v I'1 C 0. b r4 D.6 yI w~ A sstir✓1r_ D. ~ d~P'~ eood acs t , v fvirr. 0,, = Z96 CTs > Qs S{OGLE WR 0213 OPEN W& Ir\fLF7- Rr=CJu;PE-0 QLIFiC~yj /SEE 17NLET CALC-c DFPT-H AA( ST- 110 = Z C~. 33 cfs ~ E"(? TY-" ~ °i t,j ~ p.:t L`? ~ v ; Cep > Qioo ~ Ridge Road Cross Section for Circular Channel Project Description Project File hA020312\drain\pipes.fm2 Worksheet Ridge Road Inlet Flow Element Circular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Section Data Mannings Coefficient 0.013 Channel Slope 0.005000 ft/ft Depth 0.59 ft Diameter 18.00 in Discharge 2.41 cfs oS _ j . L. Q c1"5 18.00 in BASIN N o 2.41 Cf3 0.59 ft 1N V H 1 NTS 07/02/03 FlowMaster v5.15 08:40:28 AM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Ridge Road Worksheet for Circular Channel Project Description Project File h:\020312\drain\pipes.fm2 Worksheet Ridge Road Inlet Flow Element Circular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth ~j Pits I !Y QI oo Z. I c'Fs t~(t~- 1 , G O c'F3 Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.013 Channel Slope 0.005000 ft/ft Diameter 18.00 in Discharge 2.41 cfs Results Depth 0.59 ft Flow Area 0.64 ft' Wetted Perimeter 2.03 ft Top Width 1.46 ft Critical Depth 0.59 ft Percent Full 39.18 Critical Slope 0.005007 ft/ft Velocity 3.75 ft/s Velocity Head 0.22 ft Specific Energy 0.81 ft Froude Number 1.00 Maximum Discharge 7.99 cfs Full Flow Capacity 7.43 cfs Full Flow Slope 0.000526 ft/ft Flow is subcritical. 07/02/03 FlowMaster v5.15 08:40:39 AM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Ridge Road-west Worksheet for Circular Channel Project Description Project File h:\020312\drain\pipes.fm2 Worksheet Ridge Road Inlet Flow Element Circular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.013 Channel Slope 0.005000 ft/ft Diameter 18.00 in Discharge 1.25 cfs Results Depth 0.42 ft Flow Area 0.40 ft2 Wetted Perimeter 1.66 ft Top Width 1.34 ft Critical Depth 0.42 ft Percent Full 27.75 Critical Slope 0.004907 ft/ft Velocity 3.12 ft/s Velocity Head 0.15 ft Specific Energy 0.57 ft Froude Number 1.01 Maximum Discharge 7.99 cfs Full Flow Capacity 7.43 cfs Full Flow Slope 0.000142 ft/ft Flow is supercritical. 9\D&E -OAI -v"JeO_& (~So uT,4 of SKYLINE F)LW&O) "too' i.~C' C,,~c F r 0,62 ccs 07/02/03 FlowMaster v5.15 09:36:06 AM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Ridge Road-west Cross Section for Circular Channel Project Description Project File h:\020312\drain\pipes.fm2 Worksheet Ridge Road Inlet Flow Element Circular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Section Data Mannings Coefficient 0.013 Channel Slope 0.005000 ft/ft Depth 0.42 ft Diameter 18.00 in Discharge 125 cfs 18.00 in 0.42 ft 1 VN H 1 NTS 07/02/03 09:3557 AM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 },IDGE KoAa - tNfs (Sou?-H oi- S~,VUNIE Q100 = I, 2 5 ci Ps 0, 6 2 c,Fz t FlowMaster v5.15 Page 1 of 1 APPENDIX K RELATED MAPS Melody Homes KM-Job #020312 Skyline Estates 111 October-2002 Final Drainage Report Appendix Federal Emergency Management Agency 1 531S3 u ~ 0 c Y j FU U I W Z N U W, Z O N 0 U s i3tl3A3 1J ll3tl3A3 A i 4 ~o ict z E -IS 6N',nUV 1S N: w a NV IIOH 1 CN > w' a > r a P 3 O ai 1 e sr, NCSIll3r 15 ONIld1A Z O w z 3 I N ~ -1 SO3ll IlY n III a w =II lr 3EOON I'. a r J = e y F b a ~ r 3 3 3 3 I w I J 7I d ?1 Q I - IMP ? ~ al Ll~~f 13~avd..F~- PI Lam' I m ~ w n P < 3 Lj I Q ; 1~ 3 ~ Ls seoa!.. O T 1S SWW IS \ K~ is aoovi U is his v~ r~~~ m I07 , nv 108 105'.- Z 107zr.,.. t .a> Yt x x x 7 (t l ll r 105 ~Ti~~R` e ~+,'rr r v q r ' 1 ~ ,~i~YY€ r^ry' ~ AY A S~ ~"+fH~C ~ 2 Fuld ':e ~ ~~e'H~ta~ s<f 4t:. t 151. ♦k+r ~ s 39 y y 4 r1dk A$ ..v aS t . "xnt U. r. 2 Golden Area, Colorado 'U 7 C C O U I N W W W W E °z a a 0 N 1 N a m F 399 c v Y O Y N L z c ; 3 3 3 0 m O ; ; 3 3 3 3 ° 3 P 3 ° a a I I U _ I - I 1 1 I I 1 W 9 - I 1 ~ m Y- Y i I I I 1 1 I ° Y W I Y N 1 I i N N I y 0 m I I L I I L L I I P L .C F .C I 1 m OY P v r P m m P m m m m t4 m O O m m O m SO O O a C o s s x x E E s z s s z - - - - a- -a- .i 1 1 I I 1 i i i ~ I I I 1 { . C 1 Y i Y Y I I I w 'N I 1 i 1 1 ~ 1 F O I 1 I I L I L ' j i 1 mLY YW U I L I I m 1 m m l1 ,O 3 3 3 3 ° W 3 t9 # 0 ° 0 0 } ° 0 ° ° a s x ° E E . ] . m m v C q Y 1 I I i 1 I 1 I W 1" L y I i I 1 Y W W 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I O O y ~ S I I o O I I I I = W U - - - L 9 m y+ O O 1 O O O O O O N 1 N ~p ~m 1 1 ~O d V. ~O l0 ~O I O O d H A ti N O m rl H N ~ P .F I I ti 1 1 I I ly Y i N I I ; I 1 1 1 i Y C 1 L I 1 I I I I T 1 L E I ~ S Y P O O O O 0 11~ O O 0 0 0 • O N O ~O ~ b b r{ W I ~O O .O ~p ~O ~O ~U ~O N ~ ^ n ^ .T O m m I i i C I I I I 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ I I C 1 1 I C f1 Y I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 I I 1 1 I I I I I .i N 1 W I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 I O y I o A L W I I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 ~ I j 1 I 1 1 1 I I j j >a I H 1 I I I 1 I 1 I 1 ~ 1 U F I t ~ C I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 ~ I 1 C I m I 1 I ~ W ~ m m v m v v L U C C F F F ro ro O O O O F C ° ° ° ° ° z z z z° o z° z z z - a -s z 1 U O ~i L m C l U I U U m U U O I] L T tt1 U A O Gl F H - 1 I I I 1 t Y I ~ I I 1 I 1 1 1 I ~ I I I I 1 1 I C I I 1 1 1 I 1 j I I 1 1 1 I I W I +6 1 I I I 1 ^ •m I 1 I I I I +1 1 1- I 1 d F 1 I I I 1 I L I O I Y 1 1 I ' 1 I O ~p I 1 1 I i I N ~ 1 H I 1 1 H H I I 1 L O I 1 1 1 1 I> O ~ ^ 1 ~ ~ I I 1 •O H 1 1 r l C ~1 C I L i I I C + 1 I P I u EE T E I I I I C I C ^ ~O 1 m L W I m H 1 1 t0 ~ +W I m O N C m 1 1 ~ O ~ I ~ ? ~ I n I m m H m m 1 P > 1 >a T H I H + 1 C F I N I C C C I 1 . m S' H a v 1 Id I W I N I L I L I m • ^ F m 1 E ^ N I Y Y m .i ^ ^~o ~`'i ° ,i W C O I H 1 V 1 3 I •O 1 3 I 'O I m 1 'O 1 'O y ~ A y P 1 >a • Y O i 1 N N i y 10 Mrl P L > N a. ti m O O E 1 I+'1 I '1 L y L D\ m n r iW HM O H"'~N N6'. 2 N •Y U + \ F OZ OZ bZ OZ O OZ U OM HN . H N ~ ~O V] L~ E 6J S O i Ir-1 M ,-I - e-I f-I 'i 'i .Pro Y 0 c Vml r " 102-Nunn clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes. This is a deep, well drained soil on high terraces, tablelands, and tans. This soil formed in calcareous, clayey material derived from mudstone and shale. The average annual c` precipitation is 13 to 17 inches, the average annual air temperature is 47° F, and the average frost-free season is 126 to 142 days. Elevation is 5,200 to 6,500 feet. Typically, the surface layer and the upper part of the subsoil are neutral, dark grayish brown clay loam about 6 r inches thick. The subsoil in the next 17 inches is neutral and mildly alkaline, brown clay loam and clay. In the ? lower 12 inches it is moderately alkaline, pale brown clay loam. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches is moderately alkaline, light yellowish brown and very pale brown clay loam. Included in mapping are small areas of Englewood `soils in small drainageways, Denver soil on terraces and fans. Standley soils on gravelly terraces, and Ulm soils on hill slopes. Also included are small areas of Urban land. The included soils and Urban land make up about 15 percent of the total acreage. Permeability of this Nunn soil is slow. The available water capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is slow. Water erosion and soil blowing are slight hazards. The shrink-swell potential is high. Rock fragments make up 0 to 15 percent of the volume. In most places this soil is used for grazing, as pasture and as recreation areas, and for crops. In a few places it is used for community development. The native vegetation is mainly western wheatgrass, green needlegrass, and blue grama. The average annual production of air-dry vegetation ranges from 600 to 1,200 pounds per acre. Small pastures commonly are severely overgrazed and eroded. Livestock in small pastures should be kept in pens. The rest of the pasture can be used as exercise areas and for very limited grazing. Seeding speeds revegetation in areas depleted by heavy grazing, cultivation, or other disturbances. Heavy infestations of undesirable plants can be controlled by chemical or mechanical treatment. Grazing when the soil is wet results in compaction of the surface layer, poor tilth, and increased runoff. The establishment and maintenance of grasses, shrubs, trees, and garden plants are restricted by the clay loam surface layer and clayey subsoil, which make tillage difficult. A mulch of plant residue reduces runoff and helps maintain tilth and the content of organic matter. Applications of manure and of nitrogen and phosphate fertilizers are needed to maintain fertility. Supplemental irrigation is needed at the time of planting and during dry periods. The small areas of Urban land are covered by streets, parking lots, sidewalks, buildings, and other impervious manmade structures. Because runoff is rapid, storm drains, natural drainageways, and land grading must accommodate heavy flows to prevent flooding downslope in areas that normally would not be subject to flooding. The main limitations to use of the soil for homesite development are the shrink-swell potential, low strength, and slow permeability. The effects of shrinking and swelling can be minimized by proper engineering design and by backfilling with material that has a low shrink- swell potential and installing surface and subsurface drains near foundations. Properly installed tile drains below the foundation and minimal surface watering near the foundation help prevent seepage into basements and minimize the effects of shrinking and swelling. Buildings and roads should be designed to offset the limited ability of the soil to support a load. The risk of settlement can be minimized by compacting the building site before construction begins. Special sewage systems must,be installed because of the slow permeability. Erosion and sedimentation can be controlled by maintaining an adequate plant cover. On irrigated cropland, the main concerns in management are proper use of irrigation water, controlling erosion, and maintaining or improving fertility. Incorporating crop residue into the soil and maintaining the content of organic matter increase water infiltration 4 r~r +m~i I ✓ Y r .:k . ✓t Y i ✓r' '•:rCC'r t r. 5 G ~ f• +'%y 9. .:✓I~.✓ . r ✓r , ✓ : ..%t: ✓;i:::: Esc ~..t'..~';,,.;;'•; , : rY ✓ . O .4G.: :k~.o.•✓.•'''✓.• .F.`Ki'.:~ .'r..• v.✓✓~'~~. ..v✓''';'::::r.;:::.✓'a 't. .5~. ~ ,air °:w ,~.:..k..z3::,r .f ,h' •r w' v. c. .:K.. :.1 . . •y.t: . 1. ~ :i .G->..is'' ~ .✓S:.s: .•'~~%;Y tt:c: jy✓ ,tij' .k v 3✓~ ~ :~:r ,~.,.;tti .k• .6•r a•• : • ~+.G.. k:G:~: r:' ,r- * :x ~ . . c". ;;i: .i: IR~ i i ye,~ ti.:G.^:~:ti~:-::: :.I .I: G. ^l ~ S Y S 4 t. •'tii~ :d .•S.'S •t . y TS y:} ;f:; rn'' . r ..tv~✓,. , k ~ S , - is S': - ` . - 6i~R _ V/ , , . . , , . _,>,~,t ~ 5 F sw - , . , . ✓ ~ iw , . x:. , ' ~ was - . - S. ~ ✓ . . . ~~~e J•. J . r . r.., e r. . r+~+srn~rrs e~ rhr►~+rr~ Kw r tsot► rr~s , . : ~ ~ r. ~ r r ter, r rr• r r. r r a ~ r x r ~ • ~ . ~ , : , yj. ~:i'" } r. t rr.~1 t N~ N N~ 6,. r r r ~ri~i r N ~ ~...v,,.. . ~ rM ~E 1~ N~ ~r t!!1'1~ 1~ h I r M* s~~ Y" G.^ r ! d wl 1 E i ~ t 11 ~Lr ~ N ~ r W /f F ,k . "`V '''~':'~.r M`w ✓ .s.. Yry M it llNt ~ !NM 1 7 t r eta ss ssa ~ shs~, ~t ! _ ~ giMM~. +wY~r ^sefM.re~r ~i y~/~, w~~$. ~'Y i r. ,A r'.,,~++~~,~ + : 'r: pp 1. 'r'Y"tl.~.~° ~Y'''ri !n$~ . ; , aRA~~~GE ~HA~NEI ANt~ v,....r L: ~j§ ` ~:e. r N ~A LITY a . • D ~ CI SG _ . • . ?'S,. I;. t "s•", r ~ ~'i ~:;:;4;; 3 .~..L~- - . - ~ ✓ a ~ y r s rr✓f N h r d*'. M' C ..........v....h..^.ht.:~...h.e.....i...r...r..s......_,. ~:.....v.. ...+.n..1n.-...~.a...r..n. e.-.~.~.. . ra_sv. _s.._ ~..v~.... ~ a: _ _*.....r. e..,_._.r.-.-ux_ _,_.__.n _.v~..:.....+.~,s..a...~.+..: ~_.,.~.v~,.~..«..,,x i... .m._._,,r z, ate, G • .~r.e~ .~ererew ~'°wi.r ~r .G,.,.;' I;,. . ~ . L r ~ ; _ w .r.:s-~ . . i:~Z ( F l~-" 1 l ~ SS,H~. / /7~ f S = S\ ! 1 l .°rt%F° i :+3:;: 4l. Y; Y VALVE ANA 1~DF~Ah~T z u ~ a„s .~.z;_:: r %i~;J°,% ',ice: .`t ,f, e f~~~~ .t. .4.. R r,.. . , r ,.ti. 4 ' ,.y. ~ i . ✓ . w~yy;: _ ~ - ~i is .r . v: ~ ' c ar',~j ✓ K Y r,~✓ , v„ y r ~ + ~ , '1~" J4 ~ S ~'r_ _ _ + ~ P ~ . rr _`~l d _ . j ,~;vr;✓P r✓.A. ✓t$, Cir( r' w~~ . iY 'i r ,S3 .r.. r r' ~ , }t b t. 1 , ~ 4 ~ U1 , a U3 . , , ;i: ' . L ,1 .w ~ i I , ` ~ ,,,e.,... Y . } - ~ _ ' • . . i L ~ o 1°® i , r ~ , . , , Y ~ ~~!~!~1!!! ~y 4 r ✓ z . e. }y ~ • , m, a; ' ~ - , W L I I _ , r ww ~ ~ , , s,~ . .r. e , ~ , ~ ® ~ ~ , , ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ r~r.~~ Rik { a.s2 t IL :1 0.89 J DRAWN: J ) M-P O w CHECKED.- KMA NO, X31 C C> C> C) SHEET S H <a CL W LL Z W 3 o o X ~t JJ ~ a. co 0 I W W z CALL UTILITY NOTIFICATION ~ CENTER QF COLORADO z W -$~a-~22-1987 1 x ~ ~ 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE b T T • Z B E YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATE 1- FOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUND ~ MEMBER UTILITIES. -~r11~ ~c... Z 0 50 0 ~o Sao U ~Ey Y J ORIGINAL SCALE: 1"=50' W Q I U ~ Q I Y ~ Y ~ r. 0 , Z .-t 0 Z U~ E a , a~ 3W O J W ~ , J Z : , t.' . E9 Z . Z ~ ~ ~ (!1 _ . t~ W ~ W W 1 f 1- ~ - T _ N O~ ~ ~ LE~EN . ~ ~ _o~ o-^ 3 0 f^ e'' V/ I F N A ! f r ~ N v . ......w.,•K .1 I 1 t, ~ ~ci s~. v~-r~ ~ r~ E ~ ~ F I i ~ ~ c t fig I 1~~L~E A~C~ ~F~~►T . ~ . i~ .z'; . Y / x;.,..:....,x. :s; . ` ~ ~ • , i~ti ~ ~ t . i --.,'rt ~i . . C ~f, . i'-. . . s. e..e...,.. :;S . . 1 ~Y,,;''., I f '~%'l: .,lam ii , t ~ P: ...•..i,•..•.r.,,.,.,.~.........~r..i74 ..~.F.k~ ot.~ ~ . ~ ~ , I . S . t ~t . N..r.. v. r........,... , ~ ~ i $ I . t; _ r 1 i, ~ . .r.~....w.~.~. .,z .a. »w ,;iy~ . q. f.:. r~,., rL ~ 4"" , F i f I ~ ....r. ..a.,_,.... t J'' r a~~ Y L 1 _ .c.. t...... .r-... ii s.r.r .n w ..~,._a pN -T r 1F} • x. ~ , :c Y . , . ...o-..v.. . ''K~ ~ y ` ` ~ K ' ~r^ $ f iE Pw[, .,n, , $ f ;4' rS~ad_.S ...,.,x, :tom. y~3 .....R r,........ ~ '~J f. 3,, x'; ~ 1, y ! ~ u . ~ . . z f _~i-'S 2 t . i i i; .J i= J J m~Et ~ E i~ ~ ~ ,~~.z.., r ...,._....r J y ..ice p ~ , d Y- _ t _ a ✓N Wt f a i. . ~:K G .c s .00 ~ t s i i ;•Y•''P, t MEMO, as, a a was F . AFFi: rf ✓rr A' h i Fk . a' i FAA. rh .~•d r F 3 F•. : Tl htF FKF:% ON SHEET 2 DATE: 10/15/02 ,✓✓,F~s~. t t• ,d• ' S d•": i MS it .+'ti :•'.j,t . , . $ + r ,EY a t' £ i i f'3 . l: , •'•iv .'H E ✓ . : ::c;::, ::iii . • , , #sI,ta.i, .a s sk. £t •f, ,IY £ s i aEi iR . , , _ r, E; F EcE c ✓ CC. ICSEG{ .t. . 2, .t. t. I. fit. .•s t{ do c . I , c ✓C. s £c.v...... ~.r.....,,..... it fE.. c..t . ,t£ 1. ✓ ..t. q. ,i•EEs, . c a• ✓bi Ec • • . i•. + ✓ rEtit:::•::.:•:..•:~:•••« . •:a.s scE. Es•s:i:., ;';ti:;;?i;;aSa+•, TL.'~;r!fw..f-w~~l.ft_4A.:%L'W6.2::GlSG~EG €r : .s E tY a I ✓t£s ::I: a ii 6n.. . { ss s , , ? jt ::,c,. • o-. r, cii :«~i • E:zsIY •ItE.i c f( I a .•3 s Ev'✓, ..n• :,Y: t ,fit `R. r~ :,t+>•.;e,i ,.I•.... { ( Et . I •'i~i,. :•t i ••t•£•i•t, •I+i Y tt~~ h P'• t. ii/ .tt .•t•.•.•.•...r ~ ✓n 3. • YC•✓i. C•. ' t • i ,,Pi+.,,, " 1`'.:EtE~i::;t;aE:, i Put R .nR vs✓•t. t/ ,.vt=,•.,,,.:'t.,•s •z.,s.=t••.•.~' . i . ( # : i . t s £Rh .1 , E%'.i:i'.i:i:i . i . N' R" .'t G E, tE i C ~'~'so-:•z.:~ . t n. kE` Et n,•✓+ . E ~.b.•.•i•. : 4 . . ~ . ✓i E ~ • i•n`,.tE ttt~ ~ E: Ir 31'x: t Et E'EEiE'sEE3•,•,.. IcI•n • •n••n••t t EE ` c : ~ t . t t i +•E . E I s+£n'v., EEE:EiE::E1 iEi • t... i •i: .i`v:. . z=i::i,•. t . a. t E ..•-d:iaitsiE': t•.:.... • t « i` E•'E , . s :..✓,,....v:✓ t. •n:ry t' It Yf:.t.,.. t. ~a. ...Y•Id „ t ..n.✓ ....wk it F , , . YI h., t. S:,.t .«.,.d.,s.,,.,,. ....R,.. . .r E ~ s is„« :II t~ t. •it tt .tt & ....E........ ....i,EE#,f•I~•.~ i~.E', t,..c. r„✓✓ ..........r r EE E i~.t. E iE,.t t, a t.. x...,........ .I. t t. t.i,,. ,t,......-TT a. ✓ c.,.,.t t tE~' t.E t c, i, i..{E.ti,,.,,t,,; ..,..,c,. {.~.z,,,.,,..«,_......I..t...E....,,...,......r... .:'...•:,r•.,F~t...,n.,....E•ftEr.~ .E..{..~.. :::sst;::,:.:•:.:.::•:•:...:' ✓;f,... .;:s ai,;''•, at,:s:•'nn,.:.:.I,;i:,;.~c,;...n:.:,:.;:.,..✓.r.....tncE`.:'•I~~P~.ntn.EE.nr ....~E~E:.E.r✓,i.•Ecn.•i,,,.fl,;a:,rt,.nE.....-i•..• ~.,nn,~~,.•~•.•,., , .,t.E , l E., t., a... ,.t ,.f DRAWN: KJC CHECKED: KSR , , . K NO, M-020312 SHEET NO-W i J~J _ _ W W Z CALL UTILITY NOTIfICATl4N ~ CENTER OF COLORADO Z W - - -1987 1 8aa 922 ~ es~ j_ 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN A~YANCE Z EFORE YOU DIG GRADE OR EXCAVATE F- FOR THE MARKI~lG OF ~iNDERGROUND ~ MEMBER UTILITIES. J Z 0 rr U a; r f e: ~ PROPOSED C~ADE ~ k' W ~ ,..4., Q 1 sraaa+M^^ .e.>~.mwwri z aasnNc U GRADE ~ 2.0' ..w.+~.•e ew.... , *mak +s-:,rs.*~w°-e.s~;~wrws*enaw.w (REC. N0. F1200729) enema«yq. y.aar+v .r.nAWI~O'bfiM•xrow. ..xn ws.?. Tt-~."N. ,nNnwn~.4N ~ (TO BE VACATED 8Y { ~S' f t 9$ t .eds... M.e SEPARATE DOCUMENT ~ t 7 w-... j ~ 30.0 I 11.0' R.O.W. i ` X , w-wr.~..,.,.. Y EQUISTRIAN ~ ~ ~ tRAll ESMf. 6.5' { A..,. 4 i Y SECTION A- A T1E INTO EXISTING ~ ( I ( W~ RIDGE ROAD t .,...xw w.. ~ onsn~a c~~►ss-uNO~ sw~ GROUND 49.69 LT. I I ESMT. ,...-~,~.w ...~.wa~.. ~ ,~.i+t n sc~: ~~=~o' EL= 5438.03 I ~ I I w~cq~e+nw++' r_ ...=,a..e.+~.~a.e._.n..a...~....n. ~ l . Far.roa. w.. ,r,...~.r...,~N. y'ps.+....w. Z 5.0' SIDEWALK EXISTING GROUND I ~ . u.+n ..,.r..... w. 5 S t b S t p ESMT - ~ i ~ I 1 1~ ~ POND H 10.0 UTfL 35.0 DRAINAGE ESMT 8.3' ESMT CHANNEL TO 8_Q~ 8E CONSTRUCTED ~ 5.0' 10.0' 5.0' 10.0' 5.0' RIDGE ROAD WITH SKYLINE :15.0 UTILITY ESTATES FlIJNG 2 DRAIN~RGE ESMT W CHANNEL. AND ESM T Z ~ ~ r w ~x_ W ` .n+r^" r~ ~jey. I~- SLOPE VARIES SECTION E-E ..s.~,,m rt~'~ r ~ 4:1 MAX 4:1 SLOPE } L,., t ~ COLUMBINE LOW-FLOW V-TYPE CONCRETE TRICKLE CHANNEL raua ~,5 4' WIDE. 9" DEEP. 8" THICK J SECTION B-B _ F ~o~v aR~ss-urn a~x c~u~~ e~ x~ ~l 4~` sri~.E ~ w=~ ~ ~ i... z g 1 3, ~~`~s w w 'a : ~ .fit _ t 4~ . k ! ~a ~ Y 5 t s F fy a t.t~. r s ~ w~ a ~ ~ . d... 't,,, ~ ~ ; r~ * ~ - 5. a ~ ~ a $ 7.y.:ey{!f.Y.Y.~}M1~NT!°:;h•+;d+SRnr q9•; 4 ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~l: F ~ I ~ ~'i~ r: ~ ~ ~ f' ~ ~y ~ gf , Y .t ~ h~{ ~ ~ a: _b t '-.,aF , R { { ~3 M1 3 i77 ty F tl Y. a ~ 'ti`• r. t ; w M ~ j'~ 1 4i 7 =UN~i'TS.+"+.~i•f~+at.-0'rk+W+.^sbJd~~:~.4'~:BnPV'r~tkw+M'KJNPHMHHn'wM~MKSire~iV.%%'~~"+CHJ' iM?Cbti+CA+{e'~~SKrw7Yti!~~` ~y yhb ~ I i R'.ti 4 I 'x 7 ~ 5 { Y J { ~ 1 9 S vs~ r 9! i F ,:7.:5. ` } ~ v "4 T ! t 5 7 ¢~f e~ ~ fin' K ` w ;T w'.~ ~ s t c Z, L R i M1 ~ > , ~ ~ ~ i 1 y ® ...~,..v..-,1 ..v. v ve-..~... ~4 ~it, t ~ ~ 1 ,i1 ^ ~ ~ ~ + ` ~ ~ ~ ' ` { ^Ni~ 4'a ` .,.5 c~ 1 ~ • } . i ~ ~ E $ • r: 5 t ~ m~Mn;+1ac+N,~r^,+~.. inn.-~~sn o.~n w.~ea,...;•. .m.-v:..f.ro-i- g~}~±~:-r .~M-Yw•f+rart~r.xn~n~wn+r+~>~nr.v 6 ' ti~M '.1111.4 f n: i ~ ~ .r_~... Y~y tt k-. i~~ u- ~ Y~ t ~ Q 7~ ~ : a ° ~L fV.... ,M . xs a~ ,-,~.~+a.w~n+~,~.~~a~wr+~~nM.~~~ * s s„ t t i 8! ~ i 1 •A ~ 9 R '~t ~i !1 `s 4 .r S }SSS+,MMi^.db[dM ^T h?M•NG~&Y-0 4 /~Y 5 !M ~ a , I J...._.-e-¢. F b f e V a • 't ~ s 'P { M ~ ~ L * M ® • M 1 j • :u~ " i s • • ; w ' T ~ f....... « w Z m w • ~ ; ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ s • ~ r • f ! ~ ~ * • ~ • ~ ~ ~ • • ~ • f ~ _ . ~ _~._.~w 9 ~n, " VAD7H VARIES t v;i = ~ • K. a ~ { r~;t i DRAWN t KJC I I 40 i I ~ ~ ~ f r j 3 CHECKED: K I ANNEL Qwm~FLQ.W- V SHEET NO, a CONCRM 04M*gL i i q SCAM I =I 9 y 9q it i M P ~ CALL UTILITY NOTIFICATtQN W CENTER OF' COLORA~ a a W ~ z - -922-1987 ~ z 1 840 ~ ~ 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE Z YOU DIG GRADE, OR D(GAVATE x~ W FOR TliE MARKt~iG OF UNDERGROl1htD ~ MEMBER UTILRIES. u~ Z z J a Z ~'t E U z 0 J W U Q I O~ U Q I 4 j Y ~s i ~ t ~r S ~ F' t y1a s ~~N 6: ~ p~d ~ Y~'di 1( ~ Y r , ~ - - - 0 Z 0 0 w S 1 • w d Z la 1• ~ ~ U µ ~ wr ~rnr ~wr■wr a~■A war Z J 0 ~ ~ ~ v N ~ I~ W i 6 O Z I 2 ~ a~..► r ep„t.,~,. a,. '~y 0 ,r~" 0 r J n W V'` p. M1 ~ ~ f K•~,~,.. ~rp~'~ 7~ x ~~M,.. .L ~ W<*iK'rvp:'f NAM}ndN~MtSV°D•i v+1 .SG& . N..I•vM^A....l.. v, w!+ .N':MwYShM'WY.~I~~FSM.}~}AN.w. vvH4a.!V'HFl'F'NY}49v'~1.1.}•fNM0.1?MI.NA.} 4"i uN}.~"!'• M.}.MM1'4M'iN'~ rv ~s } ~a ~A b6MS~N7`9:':RSAMY~.~ N6di1:'.aE+'rv4~9.YW4f !1NSr!T all, i .~d • l~} +s:.». z ~y t y $ A :D .i... ~ ` _ "T a i T f h ,fir,.. a :l _1 n L O Z Z R~ f ~ a ~ z 4~ 9~ !i J Q ~a a~ l~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 9 4""' 1 w t 0 Q Z f. I r= r 1 F- ~ I 1 ~ J W Q Z ~ ~F`~.:~.,..~~ ~t aMM ell0/ /.J~F Y ~ yt7 r~.y Fi w~ f ® W ~ p 4 tea.. ~ _ i ~ t 1 1~ +*~grr C fw ..r. t 1 w.a V~ ~ 1JJ L / / ®S 6'~+ M1~1 i MU ✓MM i f Y •e ~ # titMf s+Q..* d 8 i yC3 lomw w a w •urw. 1 r r o CLC DRAWN: KJC CHECKED: WCA KMA NO, 1 A C3 ~a 9 SHEET C C p► CLFall LL -MONO i ~ 0C)x cc rt E F • ~ M 1 i A~IwM*mn'ra'r..ert.r.+.v.a~c~+w~nw.a-+win~w.a,w4ky+~~waP. wYYI hSV 6# pgmae.r.~w, «e.we. y.n.~.t~wauq.ig. f.P~ 9k^+rFN4t9M'A^ +q a. .A:ki y.:..:. I . w- bin. aos? ~o H x~. tiv p' s;t ~ ksvt ~ i~~ ~ i ~ R ~~p r ~ ~ ~ ta'` ~ i 2 ~i~ i ~y ~ ~ z. ~ l ~~aa 1 t'~ .1'di {t5i' ~it~ ~ ' ,f~ ;.~~~t ry . ,ti, a kI ~ ~ r~~'y ~ ~r a ~ ~ ~1yt K f, 3 k.-„~ n. ~ sx3y ~ , h x 5;;~$1i'' z! r h~ 's~i"~~r ~9: ~ ~ r 7 s ?at` < i ~ .~3i =3,~ 9 - - • FFId~1+1Y^Yb4 ++YaM"1~'d*P4d $h4#6~afi~.srY +pd*d'MS.A+hW,~ ~i*Y+WI*&A!~~~^. d,.4,k_M`rlvFJvH !#-iw~kNk^F~1^L'~ 'y. ap^e+Yi^F8W^9~ • ww~ ~ NM xPM ~ f~ ~ r *,.y ii~ , 2 eL r 9., ~ / 9 v.~, . ! 8 / ~+^ur,gFe.r..r ~,w.. .y. ~P : ,&i~-.r ,v, ".'Svey~„ ~ e. ~wr ~ J ~ Tt' rv ~ .E n gj { V FW~. ~ a ~ L ii ,e^f J ~j G" ' ~ r y J . ..r,..,..... I, J ! # ~ ~ k~a4d i rl f, ` k~ai;~` aNist~attl~Nl'" 'di+i~#V'ka~t" , iti~~•~~ h " is ~ x° t ~ + F. t 'Jl l._j:ii ~~9Y1~F~~f~SY48~V7tM~.~~~111Vi~ lP9~tlt~. ~~y~ ?Lt e.~sax~xe~ ~..»~xci-: t f i-_..-.~ ..fin.-{.~ :rd.. j ~ ~.r ...N ~ ~ ~r rl ek,' w ~ . x ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~gg ~ 1 .r*p' ~ ' ~ f ~N rte. n'~ ` f' y~' q ~ i _ r r a~ .w. , ~~4 " ~4Uem.ww+o0~uu'~+c~, *fb'"~„!l~: ~lp~'~~ad+w .~tr3r~ :+Sid+✓Iw.o-^`/'aQfFE°~A.)'ld'Yii i.'ak~:j;': y, ` n,' ty3j'~ J ,d` ~I ~ ..4:, ri * 1 1 f; _ . ~ ~ ff r r p ' ~ ; y.~f.._ - ~ - i i ; /r_ .,mod s ? f ~ ; F f ~ ,x ~ i • a a ¢ k • ~ ~ r ~ y~y ~ ~i j ; ~ s.,,». y ~ " i ~ a ' j ~ y i ~ t i .'J f t q V f ,dl: ~ Y x k ti,, .y , uk ~ . ~~j i i r 1A: .w,~+a.w,w«.rnMr,+,,...~... ~ Ihi~i, ~ rtR ~,1 .1. i ti.. ~ ....r....: mn R..M., . r,+.. fit. .w *w...e. ~ L ~ ~ S v t ~ F 4' d.' ,ate ~.~""s, ~~c " k. ~ ~ ~ t' ! ~ ( ..v...vww.*....u-~.rY.~r~ " ~ ~ der ~ F t t ice" ~•t~• ~ fit"' 5 t Y ~ t P f ' ~ ~ _ i ~ .a' 2 ~ ~ 5.. r.wvw ,v.., ~...w I' f ~ „s.~ P f1~ ~r i . y . 1- iii / ~..,..-~.~,a.. :S. - t} t 1 i r. _ ter'' . ~t .rte r,. . . s pi ~ t i •'F ~ ~ J i i ~ l~ ~r. i f. ~~p4 ' ~ ' {l t,_ F a"0 r=.'i ~ i r t ~ ~ ~ # . A ~ i ,,r ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ . . ~ ~~s~~ !r _ 4 1 77 } i~ :3"- 1 i ~ .r ✓ r o ~ ~ ~ , -,a~ j i~ ~ ; ` s o i ~ ~ i ~ "rr r i i i ~ i . , .f;. t . Iq , , fr. a t 1 ..n..v x....,c.i..~..~..x. iY..ere.a..v.w m~u.xn+va'+~.+r, .+.una•+~•""'"" ,.M..~,w >v. y.. { ; { Y~,. ~ I~ .rn.^~. rJ .~"rte ~ ~ i I3 i y Y9 4 ~.4~ :st :a ' i f`4 ,fir i i ~ ~ ~ f i i, i ~i ~ ' ;vi i~a~ ~e j~ a • ~ f _ ~._2 ~ . ii ` S e.~ ~ { , • C+ p _ ' ~ t 1 t ~ ~ ~ , i ~J~ ~ ~ f i ~ ~ ~ I } yL k~ i' J l,,.' ~ 1 t i j t~.. yi ~ 9 S i ~ ' I ? ~ ~ o ~ t t ~ ~t ~ i t ~ , f v w.w .n.a=.v-x..Mx.~ ...r anvr. ..r 4 1 . S i i ii ~ ii i ~ i ; - ~ i i ' t ~ t. ~jj i 'f t r _ ~ i. ' ii ~ i. ~ ~ ~ r ~eT t r # f r ~ tt ~~.1 i6 Y~ ~ ! z ~ '~s ti. `iI :.A~t 1 t i~-tilt J~ } 3 7 ~K. 1~ .f3" Yb 3'i i S • * i ~ f 1 i ~ .4 .5. F: I t 6 i 3 d ~ r, ~I ~ 4 .`k i ? y 3 J. s t' ~ y a t i }ii } ak 'i I . ~ i i ii j' j s• ,i. .i ;1; . ~ s ; , , ? ? r ~l ' + ~ ~ ; t r~ ~ • ; ~ z J t ' i ~ ~ ~ . ~ / r'• ~ .t •'r i.6. A a F hbnN. ~ 5 } ~n, r' .vX., ya. . gg ~ ~tF... ssss•..,-w•rrs,..~.,:.. U sjh ~3 ~ ~ t ~`',1 r- _y,,xir ,s~:^' f¢'" Y,f, _r , ~ ° i ~,i~' ~ ~^iN dif ~ i` i t' • ~ ~ ~ ~r~ Mir ,b~.""~' t~~ ~ i ' DESIGN** KJC ~dt ~sY~.. .k. L. •i.~ .1~,. i'~,.'_ .i~~,:~~~~~bl~ L~ _..ea ,r" ,:~"P"rr'' # ,x', . , °.kY .~.'~r'"f DRAWN s KJC d ff ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 CHECKED: W.C.A. i ~°""J KMA NO. M-020312 t ~ g ` r i i '"SHE .'T N. ,ut? ~;,~y~. 2 a OF a ~ . , _ ~ , . . ' m ~ ~ ~ v~~~ - _ Ac:,~v~~ss..+x. Nr.. . ~HO~.,; a.. 1 ..i.~v. eta ..F ,E:~,. ~ ~....a. do L..a ea.. i~ w.. ,nu. _.i.. i vM.iNi~Y!wavt.n:sou.WW.O^L'.#-%WM:-9~i+~:+h:rvi~'rb•Wi^oWa!:kFr.+.~A°u- .w%'~✓.. ~:+k:: Ev... >w ~ ~ rv°:4A~ . .M tw . _ ' r > > ~ :r a P' k ¢ ~ 1 x~ ~ r ~ ~ a f tr }~..,yy °c r `..H>• i .1 7- .F, .a 7 ~ ~~'y~p~1," K .'C .....Y k.,'- ~ ~ ;~1 l 1 i >j:l ~s ~ 1, i'• ~=1% sir `~iP' ~ ~ A~ z a ? ,..........r.,..... ewN~e wxCea.+~:aw~- ~.vra~wn~.. ww,+~uaw.w.«„. »•mawaww.rrEa .;:u.mwe ~ y ,r` f 6 - : ;t ~ -tY'~ { iRff"" s` :.vyma.,r+vc•Q~:wswWyN;wsraa+:•~ymo .,a •':Y ~'Y ».mawawamta .,:u.mm+xt~m»u, •.ww~s+u~m+t~e •w+a~x~W~«ar u~ i £ '8 2 {4 9 g ~ ~ ~ 33 i ~ a ~ 4.ti~ .,.,,,~....,......~~,.zy~ry»}n. -~-a-s•e~r~alw.~n~wn ...n. :.~vn :Smv~ws.-n:nv'n m... s,~a.arn.eam*ixxanW~~•roz•row;.iw«w~a~=c,f.sm...t.~.,.n,-•.i ±,m~~wrad,..,e~eK - w al.e.99.:~WY4Kroa.'^r+~dn,.in+iF iRR V •1F3~ `,fem.. ~ I . e;.wHasf.pS~a*7v .vh'a5,~ 9d ^+9er v, ✓.n.~ 9 t4} 4 ~ ,F ` S t;` ~ . ,d ~ r, ~ 3 r .n: u ~ ~~24tswM%wn~ f ~~1 v"y~• ..xmi.~.+.•.°.:..me .e.e~w....urx.~...~... r.w.....14:: .r...n.ti•' ..~h 44 _ .es.,+v~!eek ,±,+~..nnw.wa.~ ~e4Ywsrm.,+ n.+*~eura+.. .M4/n'Vf"e~n+ Avt~a*ae.~~M++' P ~ r; ~ .}ill:+Y. :.].rrr t ,F t 1~ ~ ° a ~ ! 1 ~ h ,y i i-„r,~.a.:w.~.:....,.+. ggg~ ~tr.wsm., , . , 7 5 t, " i!,° 4, ~m,Maia;~:e~ms~a€aricuui~ad~a:.i , ,.,.,.$il f~ f ; ,:diid~iiS:d : ~4 i::. yk3 { ,7>.~ = ~ ~3 ; e. 'i~ k h,, E e, A.•~`'~~:e _ ; ~.sw5_ r-. ~ 'R t i sawr:a-YSs f 3 ~ s:`,,.,..,,, . .r I ,y~~.'gY T' i` E ,.ti i ~ i} f p;.r / ~ e a. 1. 1 1 f t:4 f :4•h:{. t.ffJ.'.'R.NMe ~ ~M 'v ~ 1 ~ F w~ 1 y,rv~rv~ ,y . `f ~ Fd I ~f ~ . /J ,f l sz,vfA"'" i i * *~A'.~~ °Ef. ~ . i i 4 R Y / y - m. , f ~ r~,,, ''"'u'`' y^~R. 4 .9 r f ~ . f ~ , <t'' ~ i ' ~ {7 Wr!% S ,L F~• i S f 4 1 ~ y r A i ~ i. i is ~ 1 ~ ~y w at t~ p Y~,. ~ H' f ~ ~ F x < ~ 1 r ,.N r ~ t ~ { ~ yf .y 9 u r... r........ r. s~ 'Ei .w. hp '"~k ` Vii; ~ •.d ,.f X4.8 ~ a I'y., .:a ps z _ ice;; ~ ~ ~ f w~- , r 3 ! ~ f~ . - : s - i . , i ~ ~ . ,,.,,..r ter- a~ ! ~A. ~ ~t 1~ ~I 7 ~ y t ; I' / $ N r „ ~ N p~,,• J F ,y~'''h. .~...,r,._n i' i t ~ F ~ i. IA. i t ,z ` : a~ ~ r ~,l , 1. ~..4..,,w.w-~. , , ,ter, E f 1 , a ~ y r i 1 r 1 .p., ~ N~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ W ~f ~ r,~ 1 s ~ x. iII ~ x r t ' ~y S '~d t l~~.....,,. I ~ - 1 I X~, .e.w,e/nwra....,...,.... vN. r. .>~u+,..n.,.t.mn.u nn.+~.a. wri++, NJ s 1 ~ i S 1'r r..,F.,r ' i i t l t s r" i i. ~ ~ 7I ~ 'if 5 f f s 4 'g 5, i . C.' !Y1 4 7z. t ~ ij: r. ~.v ~ fi i~ d 7 ~1 r/ AAA yTl P ' r i;~t k t iI{! 3 II } . ~ ` R 1 1 ~R y' r w~ tf ~s^" i j ~ I ~ ~ i 1 ~ ~ i ~ ~ y $ f ~ ~ ~ `r ~ ~ ~ F d ~ i 3 ~ ~ ~ 3 s a ; . i 1 { 1 ~E } eY..m+,.aw v.✓.W .n+.w-•~rv «s.. a w.:rn ,..u m~a a ~ E i 01 r~ it ~9 f i f t ~ ~ - ~ f 1, 1. T ' j ~ r r i ` $)j+ F 3 i yP ~ f! '1 ~ . { a:, 1 . 1 _f _ i I ~ i1. ~ ~ • ` ; Wv. ar x ~ ~ ~ i ° Y i' I ~ I ~ ~ ~ r _ . , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ R ~ ' .il;:. ~ ~ w~' ~ f i } ) 7 ~ i v ..51'y Y.d~~.; k 2 dv :~7:: 9 ` t' I ~ , ~.L 1 f ~ ;s, t~'.:, i. 1 1 ~ 1 ~ i JJ ? f+ a 3 ~ s ~ 1 ~ 'P: ! I ' ~S w: ~ ~ { ~~ti~ 1 k : Fi' ~ y ~j, F ~ : 3 y i 1.'` . ~ j p,, ,.'.:n ~ << ~ ~ ~r '1 ~ ~ ~ , s ~ ti - - ~ . ~rf.t, o vrn ~ f~~ ~b ~l 1 71, v 1 r 3 r. rMr. waa.o•masa. ~ r 4 i ~ . ~dt.. k . y ~ ^ r~ ~ , .4"" x...,.._.....?:..,..iss!FPf",ki>T.~._~d.~. ..'~~'~`ts.~' Ss 1~4f: ..~_..:iy}. 4a;.~i~L ..~i`• _,.d'~'° .~.:r"'~`~ ' . _ ;r'~' s - i DESIGN: KJC DRAWN: KJC I CHECKED: W.C.A. ~ i KhAA NO. M-020312 SHEET NCB. J+R r ~ 2 2 OF 2 1 s 3 p W a y z ~W w z d z wx z V w z J ^VI z z 200 0 200 400 F. o SKYLINE ESTATES w ORIGINAL SCALE: 7"=200' N Z FIC 11m& 3 8tts~N ° / I~ M 9AS IN L zooa U PoN y DU7FA L L / © EX3 F BAs I N EX 2 A' ~ Vs`.`, • ..i t ibl i Ed. / X7 J _ 17 ✓ 'r , . / + 1 a it i i f / / % _ h _ - r ' ~ rc ~ a % z a u a j r w m xp a /f _ ^ /C N/~ DATE: B-B-C] -BrAte IA(1 DESIGN: KJC e / ■(rl DRAWN: KJC CHECKED: wCA ~l ! V K N KMA ND. M-03031] I I SHEET NO. 22 1 3 F OF 0 ,WA-a2--/S # 1 Owner :State Of Colorado (env Site :10285 Ridge Rd WhMail :3550 W Oxford Ave'LandUse :9129 Exempt,State;TaxDist 1062 Bedrm: Bth: YB:# 2 Owner :Lic Investments Inc Site :5000 Oak St Wheat RaTzj Mail :9030 Vincennes Rd ,wadi LandUse :3112 Ind,Improved'L d TaxDist :3105 Q: Bedrm: Bth: YB:19 3 C~l3vi Metroso / Jefferson : Schedule :042821 `j,. 't Owner :Coors Brewing Compa",i C Site :10619 W 50th Ave „V__ at Mail :PO Box 4030 Golde Co 8 0236 7003 0500 0004 7661 1510 Price :$44 OwnerPh g: Firepl: TotArea:380,869 Ac:86.80 MetroScan / Jefferson • Schedule :085141 In 46268 7003 0500 0004 7661 1527 l Price OwnerPh g Firepl: TotArea:157,936 Ac:8.85 '-MetroScan / Jefferson : Schedule :136211 80033 7003 0500 0004 7661 1534 LandUse :3112 Ind, Improved(LanA%'N" Price TaxDist :3105 OwnerPh Bedrm: Bth: YB:1968 Paring: Firepl: TotArea:442,406 Ac:27.05 # 4 -t} pC? MetroScan / Jefferson • Owner H F Investment Compa'cLl'6e Schedule :193783 Site : *no Site Address* ~0 • ~Q i r;9 00 007 Mail :2401 E 2nd Ave #25 Denver 80206 7003 0500 0004 7661 1541 LandUse :1111 Vacant,Reside{ati 1~72s Price TaxDist :1062 OwnerPh Bedrm: Bth: YB: Park/ng: Firepl: TotArea: Ac:6.29 # 5 W o:=MetroScan / Jefferson Owner :Melody Homes Inc Schedule :433387 Site :*no Site Address* - +co nti n'zA Mail :11031 Sheridan Blvd Westminster Cc .80020 7003 0500 0004 7661 1558 LandUse :1177 Vacant,Residential,Limited Size Price , TaxDist :1007 OwnerPh Bedrm: Bth: YB: Parking: Firepl: TotArea: Ac:.44 # 6 * MetroScan / Jefferson : Owner :Munson Frederick J/Barbara J Schedule :435831 Site :10802 W 54th P1 Arvada 80002 - - Mail :10802 W 54th Pl Arvada Co 80002 7003 0500 0004 7661 1565 LandUse :1112 Res,Improved Land Price :$336,980 TaxDist :1007 OwnerPh . Bedrm:3 Bth:2.25 YB:2003 Parking:Attached Firepl:2 TotArea:2,509 Ac:.22 # 7 MetroScan / Jefferson • Owner :Olivas Jeffrey Schedule :435832 Site :10822 W 59th P1 Arvada 80002 n Mail :10822 W 59th P1 Arvada Co 80002 7003 0500 0004 7661 157 LandUse :1112 Res,Improved Land rice :$286,800 TaxDist :1007 OwnerPh Bedrm:3 Bth:2.50 YB:2003 Parking:Attached Firepl:l TotArea:2,056 Ac:.18 # 8 : MetroScan / Jefferson Owner :Gyurdiev Valeri Schedule :435892 Site :10562 W 54th P1 Arvada 80002 Mail :10562 W 54th P1 Arvada Co 80002 7003 0500 0004 7661 1589 LandUse :1112 Res,Improved Land rice 294,400 TaxDist :1007 OwnerPh . Bedrm:3 Bth:2.25 YB:2003 Parking:Attached Firepl:l TotArea:1,958 Ac:.28 # 9 : MetroScan / Jefferson ; Owner :Tzinov Rumen Schedule :435893 Site :10582 W 54th P1 Arvada 80002 7003 0500 0004 7661 1596 Mail :10582 W 54th P1 Arvada Co 80002 LandUse :1112 Res,Improved Land Price :$315,600 TaxDist :1007 OwnerPh Bedrm:3 Bth:2.25 YB:2003 Parking:Attached Firepl:l TotArea:2,393 Ac:.31 9 lorma(on compiled $'omvarious sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties-as-!o Mc accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. # lu MetroScan / Jefferson Owner Owner :Depinto Anthony D/Elaine J Schedule :435894 Site :5404 oak St Arvada 80002 ']003 0500 0004 7661 1602 Mail :5404 Oak St Arvada Co 80002 LandUse :1112 Res,Improved Land Price TaxDist :1007 OwnerPh Bedrm:3 Bth:2.25 YB:2003 Parking:Attached Firepl: TotArea:2,074 Ac:.16 # 11 : MetroScan / Jefferson ; Owner :Hartman Marlene Schedule :435895 Site :5414 oak St Arvada 80002 7003 0500 0004 7661 1619 Mail :5414 Oak St Arvada Co 80002 LandUse :1112 Res,Improved Land Price :$278,100 TaxDist :1007 OwnerPh Bedrm:3 Bth:2.25 YB:2003 Parking:Attached Firepl:l TotArea:I,782 Ac:.22 # 12 MetroScan Jefferson ' Owner :Schumacher Kevin s~ha ~,n o •ngson~ Site :5411 Nelson St Arvada 80002 7003 0500 0004 7661 1626 Mail :5411 Nelson St Arvada Co 80002 LandUse :1112 Res,Improved Land Price :$282,100 TaxDist :1007 OwnerPh . Bedrm:4 Bth:1.75 YB:2003 Parking:Attached Firepl:l TotArea:1,958 Ac:.20 # 13 * MetroScan / Jefferson • Owner :Ogawa Kazuyo Schedule :435904 Site :5401 Nelson St Arvada 80002 7003 0500 0004 7661 11,33 Mail :5401 Nelson St Arvada Co 80002 LandUse :1112 Res,Improved Land Price :$291,600 TaxDist :1007 OwnerPh Bedrm:4 Bth:2.25 YB:2003 Parking:Attached Firepl: TotArea:2,086 Ac:.16 # 14 MetroScan / Jefferson Owner :Kidd Marie S Schedule :435905 Site :10611 W 54th Ave Arvada 80002 7003 0500° 161 05 034 Mail :10611 W 54th Ave Arvada Co 80002 0004 7661 1640 LandUse :1112 Res,Improved Land Price , TaxDist :1007 OwnerPh Bedrm:3 Bth:1.75 YB:2003 Parking:Attached Firepl:l TotArea:2,074 Ac:.17 # 15 * : Me oScan Jefferson Owner :Anderson Mark Schedule :435906 Site :10631 W 54th Ave Arvada 8000 Mail :10631 W 54th Ave Arvada Co 0002 /\lu 7003 0500 0004 7661 1657 LandUse :1112 Res,Improved Land TaxDist :1007 OwnerPh :303-650-6036 Bedrm:4 Bth:2.50 YB:2003 Parkin tacked Firepl:l TotArea:2,697 Ac:.27 # 16 MetroScan / Jefferson Owner :Piccone Anthony J Schedule :435907 Site :10651 W 54th Ave Arvada 80002 Pay---' Mail :10651 W 54th Ave Arvada Co 80002 7003 0500 0004 7661 166 LandUse :1112 Res,Improved Land :$327,500 TaxDist :1007 OwnerPh Bedrm:3 Bth:2.25 YB:2003 Parking:Attached Firepl:l TotArea:2,511 Ac:.27 # 17 MetroScan / Jefferson • Owner :Nowicki Emily Schedule :435908 Site :10671 W 54th Ave Arvada 80002 -'n 1r' ns 031. Mail :10671 w 54th Ave Arvada Cc 80002 7003 0500 0004 7661 1671 LandUse :1112 Res,Improved Land Price , TaxDist :1007 OwnerPh Bedrm:3 Bth:2.25 YS:2003 Parking:Attached Firepl:l TotArea:2,052 Ac:.27 # 18 MetroScan / Jefferson Owner :Shrum David K Schedule :435909 Site :10691 W 54th Ave Arvada 80002 ^----I •SS 161 05 030 Mail :10691 W 54th Ave Arvada Co 80002 7003 0500 0004 7661 1688 LandUse :1112 Res,Improved Land rice , TaxDist :1007 OwnerPh :303-456-7917 Bedrm:3 Bth:2.25 YB:2003 Parking:Attached Firepl:l TotArea:2,338 Ac:.19 'g0033 C 0\ t Information compiled from various sources.~- 'Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or comyle`teness of information contained in this report. 7500 West 29th Avenue The City of Ridge FAX 303/235-2857 August 22, 2003 Dear Property Owner: This is to inform you of Case No. WZ-02-13 which is a request for approval of a rezoning from Agricultural-One (A-1) to Planned Residential Development (PRD) and Planned Industrial Development (PID) for property located at 10285 Ridge Road. This case will be heard by the Wheat Ridge City Council in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue. The meeting will be held on September 8, 2003 at 7:00 p.m. As an area resident or interested parry, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. If you are a property owner within 100 feet of this property, you may have the right to file a legal protest against the application which would require 3/4 majority vote of City Council to approve the request. A copy of the protest rights section of the code is enclosed. If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at 303-235-2846. Thank you. Planning Division. C Nocaments and Settinpa athyWy DocumentsVCathy\CC"TS\PUBNOTIC2003Xw 213.w d Aid. ~0~~i7lL°d bb,b , 7500 West 29th Avenue The City of Ridge FAX 303/235-2857 August 22, 2003 Dear Property Owner: This is to inform you of Case No. WZ-02-13 which is a request for approval of a rezoning from Agricultural-One (A-1) to Planned Residential Development (PRD) and Planned Industrial Development (PID) for property located at 10285 Ridge Road. This case will be heard by the Wheat Ridge City Council in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue. The meeting will be held on September 8, 2003 at 7:00 p.m. As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at 303-235-2846. Thank you. Planning Division. C. D cu..t and Seuin,s .,h,P , D...m . sV thy\CC"TSTU NOTIC@003\wv 213."d 7500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Wheat Telephone 303/235-2846 Ridge FAX 303/235-2857 September 24, 2003 Darrel Pennington Melody Homes 11031 Sheridan Blvd. Westminster, CO 80020 Dear Mr. Pennington: At its meeting of September 18, 2003, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Case No. WZ-02-13, a request for approval of a Planned Residential Development final development plan for property located at 10285 Ridge Road, for the following reasons: 1. The requirements of the City's Planned Development Regulations have been met. 2. Adequate infrastructure will be constructed with the development to serve the proposed use. 3. The Final Development Plan meets the development standards set forth in the approved Outline Development Plan for the site. With the following conditions: 1. Since the Final Development Plan pertains to the residential portion only, the Industrial Standards section on sheet 1 should be eliminated. 2. The typical front landscape detail needs to address any irrigation provided by the developer. 3. The maximum height for garages and sheds be changed from twenty feet to twelve feet. 4. The request by Melody Homes to defer construction of the tree lawn until such time as the industrial lot is developed be approved. Planning Commission also recommended approval of Case No. WS-02-01, a request for approval of a Final Plat for 38 lots on property located at 10285 Ridge Road, for the following reasons: 1. All requirements of the City's Subdivision Regulations have been met. 2. The lot sizes meet or exceed the minimum lot sizes established in the Planned Residential Development and Planned Industrial Development zoning. 3. All required utility easements are being provided. Darrel Pennington Page 2 September 24, 2003 4. Adequate infrastructure will be constructed with the development to serve the proposed use. 5. Sufficient public right-of-way for streets is being dedicated in the amount approved by the City's Public Works Department. With the following condition: The 37 residential lots shall be subject to the City's park land fee in lieu of land dedication and will be collected upon issuance of individual building permits. Your request for final development plan and plat approval is now scheduled for a public hearing before City Council at 7:00 p.m. on October 13, 2003. Publication/public notice fees are due September 29, 2003. Please feel free to contact me at 303-235-2846 if you have any questions. Sincerely, GZ Kathy Field Administrative Asst. Enclosure: Draft of Minutes cc: Richard Schierburg 1580 Lincoln St. Ste. 770 Denver, CO 80203 WZ-02-13 & WS-02-01 (case files) c:\...\My DocumenuVCathy\PCRPTS\PLANGCOWCORRESP\2003\WZ0213 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS IBS F T A. Case No. WZ-02-13 (continued from September 4,2003): An application filed by . I. f Melody Homes, Inc. for approval of a Planned Residential Development final V development plan for property located at 10285 Ridge Road. B. Case No. WS-02-01 (continued from September 4, 2003): An application filed by Melody Homes, Inc. for approval of a 38-lot subdivision plat for property located at 10285 Ridge Road. The cases were presented by Alan White. He entered all pertinent documents into the record and advised the Commission there was jurisdiction to hear the case. He reviewed the staff report and digital presentation. Staff recommended approval of the applications for reasons outlined in the staff report. Mr. White entered into the record a letter dated September 17, 2003, from Matthew A. Hickey of the Temple-Inland Property Group stating that their company has been operating this manufacturing facility 24 hours a day for several years and have no plans to change the hours of operation in the future. The letter suggested that in order to avoid future complaints, the City consider a requirement that Melody Homes build a berm between the light industrial use and the residential lots and to formally disclose to all future buyers of the lots facing the industrial area, that Inland and other industries located nearby operate around the clock, 365 days per year. Mr. White stated that the berm suggestion could be considered at the time the light industrial site is considered by Planning Commission. While the city has no way of monitoring disclosures made by Melody Homes, they did assure City Council that they make such disclosures to all of their buyers. In reply to a question from Commissioner McMILLIN, Mr. White explained that the light industrial portion of the development does not constitute spot zoning. Further, the area will be used more for commercial uses than light industrial. Commissioner McMILLIN expressed concern about the lack of nearby parks for residents of this development and suggested that one of the retention ponds be used for a playground. Commissioner McMILLIN referred to the Comprehensive Plan which had designated the subject areas as large lot residential and asked what changes have occurred to change this situation. Mr. White explained that all of the adjacent Arvada development has taken place since the Comprehensive Plan was adopted. Further, the proposed development will contain 27% open space and will utilize enhanced design standards. Darrell Pennington Melody Homes -11031 N. Sheridan Blvd. Mr. Pennington was sworn in by Vice Chair WEISZ. He presented an overview of the proposed development. In response to a question from Commissioner WITT, Mr. Pennington stated that the proposed light industrial site is not owned by Melody Homes. Planning Commission Page 2 September 18, 2003 In response to a question from Commissioner STITES, Mr. Pennington stated that Melody Homes had no objection to installing sidewalk along Ridge Road. Commissioner STITES complimented the developer and staff for working together to create a fine residential area. Commissioner MCMILLIN asked if the retention areas would be large enough to accommodate soccer games, etc. Mr. Pennington stated that the areas will be seeded with natural grasses and would probably not be amenable to such activities. Commissioner McMILLIN referred to an earlier development in the city where the developer agreed to place a playground in a retention area and asked if Melody Homes would consider a similar arrangement. Steve Wilson on r•=' AFT Melody Homes Mr. Wilson, Vice President of Community Planning for Melody Homes, was sworn in by Vice Chair WEISZ. He stated there would be a problem with Commissioner McMILLIN's suggestion because one retention area is too small and the other is adjacent to the light industrial-commercial area. He pointed out there is a large recreational facility four blocks to the north in Arvada; however, Melody Homes would be willing to investigate with the city the possible use of some of the fees in lieu of park dedication to develop a small park. All of the retention areas are planned to be planted with maintained natural grasses. Commissioner McMILLIN suggested that the City of Wheat Ridge and the City of Arvada work together with park funds to develop a park in the development. He pointed out that the recreational facility four blocks to the north is used for team sports. Commissioner WEISZ commented that, while she was not opposed to having a park in the development, the developer has provided 27% open space where children could play, there is a nearby park in Arvada, and it seemed unfair to make this kind of change at this point in the development process. A matter such as this should have been considered during the outline development approval process. Commissioner STITES agreed with Commissioner WEISZ and pointed out the homes will have fenced yards where small children will play and commented that parents are more safety conscious these days about where their children play. Commissioner McMILLIN suggested a joint meeting between the Parks Commission and the Planning Commission in an effort to understand how park locations, etc. are decided. Commissioner PLUMMER commented that this single-home development with yards and 2.5 acres of open space does not compare with the Garrison Street project which was comprised of multi-family dwellings. It was moved by Commissioner PLUMMER and seconded by Commissioner STITES that Case No. WZ-02-13, a request for approval of a Final Development Plan for the residential area of the property located at 10285 Ridge Road, be approved for the following reasons: Planning Commission Page 3 September 18, 2003 1. The requirements of the City's Planned Development Regulations have been met. 2. Adequate infrastructure will be constructed with the development to serve the proposed use. 3. The Final Development Plan meets the development standards set forth in the approved Outline Development Plan for the site. With the following conditions: F 1. Since the Final Development Plan pertains to the residential portion only, the Industrial Standards section on sheet 1 should be eliminated. 2. The typical front landscape detail needs to address any irrigation provided by the developer. Commissioner DAVIS offered the following friendly amendment to add two additional conditions as follow: 3. The maximum height for garages and sheds be changed from twenty feet to twelve feet. 4. The request by Melody Homes to defer construction of the tree lawn until such time as the industrial lot is developed be approved. The amendments were accepted by Commissioners PLUMMER and STITES. The motion passed 6-0 with Commissioners BERRY and McNAMEE absent. It was moved by Commissioner DAVIS and seconded by Commissioner PLUMMER that Case No. WS-02-01, a request for approval of a Final Plat for 38 lots on property located at 10285 Ridge Road be approved for the following reasons: 1. All requirements of the City's Subdivision Regulations have been met. 2. The lot sizes meet or exceed the minimum lot sizes established in the Planned Residential Development and Planned Industrial Development zoning. 3. All required utility easements are being provided. 4. Adequate infrastructure will be constructed with the development to serve the proposed use. 5. Sufficient public right-of-way for streets is being dedicated in the amount approved by the City's Public Works Department. With the following condition: 1. The 37 residential lots shall be subject to the City's park land fee in lieu of land dedication and will be collected upon issuance of individual building permits. L- The motion passed 6-0 with Commissioners BERRY and McNAMEE absent. 8. OLD BUSINESS There was no old business to come before the Commission. Planning Commission Page 4 September 18, 2003 SEP-18-03 THU 11:47 AM MFI.ODY HOMES, INC. FAX NO. 303 466 2368 P. 01 Fax 0ocurnent Soplcnibei' 18, 2003 TO: Allan White City of Wheat Ridge 303 235 2857 front: Darrel Puunington Melody Homes Inc, 303 438 7622 Subject: Minor changes requested in preparation for Planning Commission Meeting September 18, 2003 AIIan, Upon tc: reviewing the FDP document lharo are a couple of notes that need slight adjustment. What we are hoping for is, I believe, a resolution to amend sheet 1 of the 1L11' as follows: Under the "Development Standards" section the applicant requests to remove the middle column, as it is redundant, umlecessary, and inaccurate. Tn addition the following "Residential Standards" items: 2_ RLSIDP,NT'IAL STRUC'fTJ -'S ON LOTS ADJACENTTO OPEN SPACE TRACES SHALL INCLUDE, ON THE SIDE-YARD E-1AKATION ADJACFNT'rO TILL) TRACT, TIIB SAM LNHANCBMENTS REQUIRED FOR STRUCTURES ON CORNERLOTS. 3. RF$JDENTfAL STRUCTURES ON CORNER LOTS SHALL HAVE ALONG THE SIDE Or Tl1E HOME A FOUR FOOT RJ'.TURN OF DLCORA'rIVE WAINSOO'I'ING'I'IZEATMFNT OF I?'f1'f IER BRICK OR STONE, '1 W0 ONE WINDOWS, TRTM BOARD ENHANCFMENTs, VARIXFION IN SIDING MATERIAL, AND ALL VISIRLB SIDE YARDS SIIALL HAVE PRIVACY FBNCF TO TIELP SCREEN AND BREAK UP THE SIDE PLANF Ott TIME ROME. OVEWALL 5. TATS ACROSS THE STREET. Tf fliRli StIALL NOT-13F. NO MOItr: THAN TWO GA RAGE DOMINANT MODELS CONSTRUCTED ON ADJACENT LOTS, Allan plonsc dance this over and give ❑le a ofdi when you get a chance. 'Thanks dp, TEMPLE-GLAND ~INC.~ September 17, 2003 el'~ ~ ~ G" SS ~2 F Ms. Mary Austin City of Wheat Ridge Community Development 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 7001 2510 0008 2806 9443 Also Via Fax 303-235-2857 Re: City of Wheat Ridge -Case No. WZ-02-13 Rezoning of 17.67 acres of land from Agricultural-One to Planned Residential Development at 10285 Ridge Road in The City of Wheat Ridge Dear Ms Austin: It was a pleasure meeting you last week at the Wheat Ridge City Council meeting regarding the rezoning. This letter is to inform you and the City of Wheat Ridge that Inland Paperboard and Packaging, Inc.'s, as a property owner within 100 feet of the subject property, official position regarding this zoning change is as follows: Inland Paperboard and Packaging, Inc. ("Inland") operates a corrugated box manufacturing plan in Wheat Ridge, across the tracks and to the south of the applicant's Melody Homes property that is up for rezoning. Inland has operated that manufacturing facility since 1971. Inland employs 106 full-time people at the facility and has always been a good neighbor and long time supporter of the City of Wheat Ridge and the community in which it operates. The Inland facility is capable of operating three shifts (or 24 hours per day) and has historically done.so. Inland has no plans to change its hours of operation in the future and if it did, Inland would experience a significant negative impact on its ability to remain profitable. While Inland has the right to formally protest the application, it chooses not to; yet instead, Inland will support the findings by the Wheat Ridge Planning Commission. Inland is concerned about future users of the applicant's property (namely homeowners) that may one day voice some objection to Inland's use of its property, due to noise (including, but not limited to, noise from the manufacturing process, rail cars, 8333 Douglas Avenue • Suite 600 • Dallas, Texas 75225 • Telephone (214) 360-2741 • Facsimile (214) 360-1999 TEMPLE-INLAND INC. reverse beepers on utility trucks, refuse removal and the use of the roof top cyclone system for recycling), truck traffic, parking lot and security lighting, air emissions and other issues related to Inland's historical and planned manufacturing business. Inland appreciates the steps taken by the City of Wheat Ridge to zone the "buffer area fronting on Ridge Road" to a less intensive industrial use and will defer to the City's judgment as to whether or not this provides ample buffering between the proposed residential lots and Inland's well known, and historically unopposed, use of its property. Inland wishes Melody Homes the best of luck with its development and will continue to be supportive of the City of Wheat Ridge. In order for the City and others to avoid complaints in the future, perhaps the City should consider requiring Melody Homes to build a berm between the light industrial use and the residential lots and to formally disclose to all future buyers of those lots the fact that Inland and other industries are located nearby and operate around the clock, 365 days per year. Please contact me at (214) 360-1998 if you have any questions. We look forward to working with the City of Wheat Ridge and Melody Homes. Respectfully, 7Ad Matthew A. Hickey Temple-Inland Property Group MAH/ddm R Ody of Wheat Ridge i MEMORANDUM Department of Public Works TO: Mary Austin, Planner FROM: Dave Brossman, Development Review Engineer DATE: Thursday, September 11, 2003 SUBJECT: Skyline Estates Filing #3 FDP, Plat Dear Mary, I have completed the 5 s review of the Skyline Estates Final Plat and Final Development Plan. The Final Drainage Report is hereby approved by the Department of Public Works. The Final Plat and Final Development Plan are hereby approved by the Department of Public Works if the following condition is met: The handicap ramps at Ridge Road and Nelson Street as shown on Sheet 4 of the Final Development Plan, will need to be modified to include a "flat" area at the bottom of the ramps to accommodate wheelchair movement without encroaching into the driving area of the roadway. The exact changes will be determined by the final design of both the Ridge Road and Street Construction Plans. The Final Development Plan and/or Final Plat may need to be modified in order to accommodate the redesigned ramps. Please let me know if I may be of further assistance in this matter. Sincerely, David F. Brossman, P.L.S. Development Review Engineer Skyline Fi]ing#3 - FDR_FDP_Plal_approval- CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission DATE OF MEETING: September 18, 2003 DATE PREPARED: September 11, 2003 CASE NO. & NAME: WZ-02-13 / Melody Homes CASE MANAGER: Mary Austin WS-02-01 / Melody Homes ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a 38-lot Final Plat and Final Development Plan. LOCATION OF REQUEST: NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT(S): 10285 Ridge Road Melody Homes 11031 Sheridan Blvd. Westminster. CO 80020 NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER(S): State of Colorado APPROXIMATE AREA: 17.67 Acres (769,655.51 square feet) PRESENT ZONING: PRESENT LAND USE: SURROUNDING ZONING: SURROUNDING LAND USE: A-1, Agricultural Vacant land E: A-1 S: PID, Industrial N:, & W: City of Arvada residential N_: Residential E_: Public S: Industrial W: Vacant: Approved for Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AER, Agricultural Estate Residential (1 unit/acre) DATE PUBLISHED: July 3, 2003 DATE POSTED: July 1, 2003 DATED LEGAL NOTICES SENT: July 3, 2003 ENTER INTO RECORD: ( ) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) ZONING ORDINANCE (X) EXHIBITS (X) SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS ( ) OTHER JURISDICTION: The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. I. REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a final plat for property located at 10285 Ridge Road. (Exhibit 1, Zoning Map) The purpose of the request is to sub-divide the property into 37 single family residential lots and 1 industrial lot. The applicant is also requesting approval of the Final Development Plan for the residential component of the property. The rezoning of the property from A-1, Agricultural-One to PRD, Planned Residential Development and PID, Planned Industrial Development was approved by City Council on September 8, 2003. This request will create a final plat for all of the property and a Final Development Plan for the PRD, Planned Residential Development zoned area only. A Final Development Plan for the parcel zoned PID, Planned Industrial Development will be submitted at a future date. II. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING The required neighborhood meeting was held on June 19, 2002. A copy of the meeting summary and the sign-in sheets (Exhibit 2) are included with this report. III. FINAL PLAT The property being platted is approximately 17.67 acres in size (769,655.51 sq. ft.) and extends from Ridge Road (southern boundary) to W. 54" Avenue (northern boundary). This plat is titled Skyline Estates Filing 3 (Exhibit 3, Final Plat). Skyline Estates Filing 1 and Filing 2 are located on adjacent property in the City of Arvada. This major subdivision creates 38 lots. Of these lots, 37 will be used for single family residential and 1 for industrial use. As required, the final plat shows the layout of lots and blocks, streets, drainage tracts and open space tracts. Of the total property area, the approximate site breakdown is as follows: residential lots comprise 43%, the industrial lot comprises 11%, open space and drainage tracts amount to 27%, and right-of-way dedication for streets takes in 18% of the teal site area. Street dedication as reflected on the plat meets the requirements of the Public Works Department and is consistent with the street design shown on the proposed Final Development Plan. Easements have been reserved adjacent to the property lines as required by the City's Subdivision Regulations for utilities and access. Drainage tracts and open space tracts are dedicated to and will be maintained by the Homeowner's Association. Planning Commission Page 2 WZ-02-13 & WS-02-O1/Melody Homes The City Surveyor has reviewed the Final Plat for completeness, and has indicated that all requirements of the Subdivision Regulations have been met. Residential Lots There will be a total of 37 single family residential lots. The permitted uses in the PRD zoning area are limited to single family residences and typical accessory structures such as sheds and detached garages. The Outline Development Plan established the minimum lot size at 7,900 square feet. Each lot exceeds that minimum lot size requirement. The smallest lot is sized at 7,919 square feet and the largest lot is sized at 14,396 square feet. The average residential lot size is 9,564 square feet, which is approximately 0.21 acres in size. The Outline Development Plan established a staggered setback between 20 and 25 feet. Each lot allows for ample buildable area in meeting required setbacks. Open space is being provided in the amount of 4.81 acres. This amounts to 27% of the total site. Some of the open space will also function as drainage features. These areas are set up as tracts on this final plat. All tracts will be owned and maintained by the Homeowner's Association. Industrial Lot With this plat a single industrial plat 2.01 acres in size is being created as Block 4, Lot 1. The lot will not be developed in the first phase with the residential lots. However, the public improvements and tree lawn along Ridge Road will be required in the first phase. IV. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN The development of the total site is planned to occur in two phases. The first phase will encompass the residential lots with associated improvements, streets, utilities, drainage improvements and all public improvements. The second phase will consist of the development of the industrial lot. This Final Development Plan pertains to the area of the property in PRD, Planned Residential Development zoning only (Exhibit 4, Final Development Plan). The industrial lot is not part of this Final Development Plan. A separate FDP for that lot will be required prior to development. Residential Homes The site will be developed will 37 single family residential homes. The use of the site for single family residential is allowed per the permitted uses established with the PRD zoning. Planning Commission Page 3 WZ-02-13 & WS-02-0l/Melody Homes Development of each home on an individual lot is subject to the residential development standards established with the Planned Residential Development zoning Typical elevations for the homes are shown on sheets 5 thm 10 of the Final Development Plan. Each home must meet or exceed the development standards created with the residential zoning. The first floor of each front elevation is required to have a minimum of 50% brick or stone with a 4-foot return along each side. Homes located on a corner lot or adjacent to an open space tract are required to have a minimum of 2 windows on that side, trim board enhancements, and variation in siding material. Additionally, no two homes with the same elevation and floor plan will be constructed on adjacent lots or lots across the street and there will not be two garage dominant models adjacent to each other. The homes in this development will be incorporated into the same homeowner's association set up for Filings 1 and 2 in the City of Arvada. This is noted on sheet 1 of the Final Development Plan document. Streets and Sidewalks Ridge Road and West 54' Avenue are currently in existence. Dedication of additional right-of- way is being required along the street frontages of Ridge Road and West 54' Ave. Complete dedication of right-of-way for the local interior streets is required. All required dedication is reflected on the plat document. The planned street improvements are shown on the site plan. Ridge Road and W. 54`r Avenue will be constructed with detached sidewalks and tree lawns. The interior streets of Nelson, Newcombe and W 53rd Ave. will be constructed with attached sidewalks. Street signs will be installed according to the approved signage plan on sheet 11, at the developer's expense. Street lighting, as designed by Xcel Energy, is also shown on sheet 11 and will be completed at the developer's expense. Landscaping The landscape plan is presented on sheets 13 and 14 of the Final Development Plan. Street trees will be planted in the tree lawn area along both Ridge Road and W. 54`s Avenue in compliance with the code standards of 1 tree per 30 feet of frontage. Street trees will also be planted by the developer in the tracts along Nelson St., Newcombe St., and W. 53rfl Ave. Landscaping is planned for each of the 8 open space and drainage tracts. The landscaped areas of the open space and drainage tracts on this site total 4.81 acres (approx. 27% of the site). The homeowner's association will be responsible for the maintenance of all tracts and drainage areas. The residential lots closest to the industrial lot will be buffered by landscaping in the open space Planning Commission WZ-02-13 & WS-02-01/Melody Homes tracts along W 53`d Avenue. The landscape plan also includes a typical drawing of the front yard landscaping that will be provided for each home site by the developer. The front yard of each residence shall be planted with a minimum of 1 street tree, 7 shrubs and turf lawn. Fencing Project fencing is shown on the landscape plan. Lots adjacent to open space and drainage tracts will have fencing provided by the developer. Perimeter fencing with brick columns will enclose the backs of the lots along W 54" Avenue and W 53`d Avenue. The solid perimeter fence for tracts E and F along W 53`d Ave. will aid in buffering the lots from the future development on the industrial lot. Fencing of the 3 rail type will be placed around the lots next to tract G at the northern end of Nelson St. and Newcombe St. Solid wood privacy fencing is provided for the rear of those lots along Nelson St. that back to the drainage pond and channel on the east end of the site. Privacy fencing for the rear and sides of the other lots will be up to the individual homeowners to coordinate amongst themselves. V. AGENCY REFERRALS The City Surveyor has reviewed the final plat document for completeness and has indicated that it is in compliance with the City's Subdivision Regulations. Xcel Energy can serve the property with requested utility easements adjacent to the front and rear lot lines for the installation and maintenance of utilities. These easements are noted and shown graphically on the plat document. A final drainage report and plan has been approved by the City's Public Works Department. The Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD) has given their approval of the drainage report and plan for the site, particularly the improvements for the Columbine Basin channel along the north side of Ridge Road. All outside service agencies will serve the property when developed. Any necessary system improvements, taps and meters will be at the developer's expense. Arvada Fire District will provide service to the property. A traffic impact study has been reviewed and approved by the City's Traffic Engineer. Public improvements along Ridge Road are required and will be constructed by the developer. The developer will construct all public improvements required for the safe movement of vehicles. The Consolidated Juchem Ditch and Reservoir Company has agrees to the realignment of the Juchem Ditch through the property and the enclosing of the ditch in pipe. Planning Commission Page 5 WZ-02-13 & WS-02-0I/Melody Homes The Parks and Recreation Department has requested fees in lieu for parkland dedication. Staff is requesting the installation of detached sidewalk and tree lawn adjacent to the industrial lot be completed at the time of construction of the residential development. These improvements would be maintained by the owner of the industrial lot. Melody Homes is requesting a deferment of constructing the sidewalk and tree lawn until such time as the industrial lot is developed. VI. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION Staff concludes that the Final Plat meets the requirements of the City's subdivision regulations. The Final Development Plan meets the requirements of the City's planned development regulations and is in compliance with the approved Outline Development Plan for the property. Therefore, staff recommends Approval of Case No. MS-02-01, Final Plat and WZ-02-13, Final Development Plan. VII. RECOMMENDED MOTIONS Each component of this application, the Final Plat and Final Development Plan, should be addressed with a separate motion. Final Plat Option A: "I move that Case No. MS-02-01, a request for approval of a Final Plat for 38 lots on property located at 10285 Ridge Road, be APPROVED for the following reasons: 1. All requirements of the City's Subdivision Regulations have been met. 2. The lot sizes meet or exceed the minimum lot sizes established in the Planned Residential Development and Planned Industrial Development zoning. 3. All required utility easements are being provided. 4. Adequate infrastructure will be constructed with the development to serve the proposed use. 5. Sufficient public right-of-way for streets is being dedicated in the amount approved by the City's Public Works Department. With the following condition: 1. The 37 residential lots shall be subject to the City's parkland fee in lieu of land dedication and will be collected upon issuance of individual building permits. Planning Commission Page 6 WZ-02-13 & WS-02-01/Melody Homes Option B: "I move that Case No. MS-02-01, a request for approval of a Final Plat for 38 lots on property located at 10285 Ridge Road, be DENIED for the following reasons: 1. Final Development Plan Option A: "I move that Case No. WZ-02-13, a request for approval of a Final Development Plan for the residential area of the property located at 10285 Ridge Road, be APPROVED for the following reasons: The requirements of the City's Planned Development Regulations have been met. Adequate infrastructure will be constructed with the development to serve the proposed use. The Final Development Plan meets the development standards set forth in the approved Outline Development Plan for the site. With the following conditions: 1. Since the Final Development Plan pertains to the residential portion only, the Industrial Standards section on sheet 1 should be eliminated. 2. The typical front landscape detail needs to address any irrigation provided by the developer. Option B: "I move that Case No. WZ-02-13, a request for approval of a Final Development Plan for the residential area of the property located at 10285 Ridge Road, be DENIED for the following reasons: 1. Planning Commission WZ-02-13 & WS-02-O1/Melody Homes ~SITE 3 2 ARVADA 5E 16 OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WHEAT RIDGE COLORADO - PARCELILOT BOUNDARY (DESIGNATES OWNERSHIP) WATER FEATURE DENOTES MULTIPLE ADDRESSES 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN I • i (APPROXIMATE LOCATION) NE 16 a.i xr >x -x ~K. 04 DEPARTMENT OF MAP ADOPTED: June 15, 1994 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Last Revision: Seplembw 10, 2001 EXHIBIT 1 7500 West 29" Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215 City of Wheat Ridge Telephone (303) 235-2846 Fax(303)235-2857 Neighborhood Meeting Summary Date: June 19, 2002 City Staff Present: Mary Austin, Planner Michael Garcia, Development Review Engineer P Location of Meeting: Wheat Ridge Municipal Building, 2" floor conference room Property Address: Property Owner: Applicant: Existing Zoning: 10285 Ridge Road Sate of Colorado Melody Homes A-I Existing use/site conditions: Vacant land Property Owner Present? No Applicant Present? Yes Comp Plan Designation: AER (1 unit/acre) Applicants proposal: To rezone the property from A-1 to PRD and PID and receive approval of an Outline Development Plan, Final Development Plan and Final Plat. The applicant intends to develop the site with 37 single family residential homes and an industrial area along Ridge Road. Issues discussed: Questions were posed regarding plans for the industrial area. Melody Homes commented that the industrial area is planned to be compatible with the industrial area in the City of Arvada along Ridge Road. It is not planned to be an intensive manufacturing area. The industrial area will p\most likely not be a part of the homeowners association. Maintenance of Ridge Road: The road is entirely within the City of Wheat Ridge and will be maintained by Wheat Ridge. Questions were raised about the keeping of large animals on the residential lots. Melody Homes responded that the covenants will likely prohibit large animals and they will not be listed as a permitted use. Traffic circulation: A traffic impact study will be required to be submitted by Melody Homes and approved by the City. EXHIBIT 2 (O co V m (YI W N O 0 r 2 4 0 W T r_ z a O co W - a z 1A A Z W 0 W I s Q J N L 0 lz D Q Q CCD N cn I r Z D X m m p 2 z W O z-1 a ? C m r- 0 2 z > z ~ om Q -t 0 m cn O m o 003 n, v m m F m o z Z + Y (.0 co -4 0) Ut A W N O (z e (D 1 C). C CD N u w -o Q o Io v r M m (n M N = z c z z ~ m W 0 M z D ? z W M a l M -i CD N a N ~ m us o z z O O 7Fs V Q r Q t E Q O 0 tQ I r.1 E Q _O 0 'i -a 0 C a a E _O NO V o J .a O M x O 00 ,o U o U N d' O O bA r O O Y V tb O r~ vJ ct • `ry~J O O ~p zr ~ PxoPEren aw r Ews lnc_ v 5 001259 F 106647 $3 ,d P]PI~ \ _ EXISTiG DAAkUd ) tt'/ { F G ~ 200 ~~CC( 8~~ BBSi n 1 ( ~1~,Av mm, all ~I I~ gC ~ I ~~II III II I~ ~3 ,ww~n v v ~ ( nuxs) i 4}JI~ S~ w v]D xoss ~~v "v. ~w ~tti4xa A ~I ~ ~ I ~t l~ ~I 1 I I ~ ~ a.inav +snx \ '1~ I J'III J k S, ~k 1-' 11'ry ! I ✓t / S-' ~ li~i I 1 I ~ I ~ss~ ~ ~ n"~- 1 i II II ~ ✓ v 1111 I ~ I I yi ~ I I I iaod tiwcrx j?v.. ~ ~o V rarosW mw xwi: III ( ' e°w D~D 1 dv i° S~ Ess ~ IL I gT 1l syrenoi I I~ JI I~ I Ste' I rox ( w n Z; A yam- w mecr o I) II ~4 nWwE65ce uiD Uaiwnat G,t1 mw e w ~sn v za ostie~s I i t ] I I I Ih -sr o ~ow n-r G.u s ro I 4J 14 .J L><z~ III III ~'eocw o ,1~ v T If- T I e y.. )1 li ~I I ..,I 9uE I' s,. 40 a an a C1 I I ~ ~ a II I i r ] Ji ~I B°DwD ~I~ II ~ILL iuae acreesl 1~ III ~I t (1 = E I I~ _ J n r ~ xemewee srtcr a s ao.w ~ sA9.+F~4 e z~ l ~ Y IrB ~ E" ~ ~I ~I ( ~ Ilg ~ ~ ni~v I I~ ~ e~ oxdnnr~BASE u+ j(~j 11 11q III 11~ _ ~'1.~~~11 ~I +vm.c a~ A .~'"am mIES) v~ ~ i ''I I III II ~I II I I yl'~ i _ I q~ > r s~~ ~6 I I'i III I I I I~ I V'. 1 I ~ I I I 1=1 -"I I I ,I~I III I~ YNAOBE ~ ~ ( j y,l ^ _ - _ N 00'13'11" w 1246.20' / ! Dnrc siBEn E s~ I ® 'sa f o A ..¢D° cv uw i'sF i ~ s z~ _ I ( E s- En an m~osEn ,r ~ Easnxc .~DDD F pw DF 1✓ E11i d ~ Exsn iE.v _ 't d w rtx P4F9AL'. '.='N Wj E51 ® (i00 nLLV AyµppyW) t } (flfG 0 2w]I9) qE 'AIW EH (BEf M6 (I4W?t91 WM6 11M tMiIX r 31 _ I t ; I I ` a; I ! ~ SS2~4s ' I I I i ' t N U ~ I- ~I I I~ ly i ~.I ' ~ ~ o I I I a t I O~<OZ 1 x °u I, o~p w I ' ~NZd'~ I i l 6 f r.: I ,i ~I r I t iy II i - - rxnonxvn w FI~. 2my~jy2 a y~FZW J a EMUS Nvo a~y j 71 a t e i l w t I ; a I' t >'rI - ^ a~ 4 ~ I t I I x l 1~ y t / S7Mus Rl aao I I I r I I I -1- 51 - If i=r i I I J ` 5 CF .Y T/i( qN^ Y^ IF^~ NOO J ~ ~ ~T 1 f r I - r , I i j - i i 1 w z r N w z rr! W 0U ~J z zaal ct A O w wW J0a r o :E T Wy p a C~ z :J .ry mQ CC z z O ow © , .~r^ y~'( O z C z ° y z Q LLJ w ~wZ y W Q V w 40 z 3 w ~ Dow' d Q~Q ~~C3 wF-0 Q W 64~ W ~ O 0w 5 O w a O tio yy r ~ L3 z xj 0zC) w J sV~W w t9 O ©A Z zoo °Zm <z Z M o w 3 O p ~2 W q a ~iwZ z_a f3~ ~`YQ mN. d z b U tC d Uj gdC...pQl- W OIK~Zr 4 t1 600~a? Q W X } WCC U U z H? to ©z 5 W r 0. a V) Q 6 z J A P 6 w ~w,,~ C] W 4aJ ~ N 5 crip~Zt/7R~ rivt~~+'nLOi d Z rLA wSb W z ~~wr CW?a~~ on< Z Of 4 N ~ w 4 W V) x ~ :i<'NJ U ~ o W Qy~~ W Z W CJX~ O z Q ~wz w vn w TT U k ~5Q VV11 a w z a ~o w O ~w r p U LLS m q U C)w C) w ~ O r ar~ U1 Gpw} w Q Q to P w p > m z r 6 ui wz d } MQ Ln F 2 ~a z U OW g ~w ~ © O U ~ ~ xr w8z O 10 ,Q w~ 8 CL p a SR W W U L'i us°~ S w K w p u° p fC w w IL IW Q ywy pp x w 0 x w o z U O pS 4 U QU6L a pup W U- 0. ry p d :A X Q0."-'Z W wZ QzwU uirw? t" Qi'.IJ C~ ~r o m x o ~al) ~ O N y ~ U . . N O O N O U .U C7 U _0 =3 -0 -0 U) U) -0 O O U) O ~J ~ O ~ • - to O ~ ~ U ALL .O f6 Q ~ O ^ O u uNj N C6 O ~ U :z 0 L Q. U) 0 U) n co E O O C: U) . U .E O N N O . V O W Ix V a s x° o~ N U ,T oy N ~ 3 0 O co a) =3 CO Ca O7 C ~ ~ cA ~ O Cll O7 N N C6 U U) ~ 0 N a) O m C 2 N U C: (D a) 0 co - a--+ A cn C: C: Ca N - : U O N 0 04- N O C: (D (D N (n _ N C 4-0 U U C to c O N Cll N N m C6 N R m O cn x O 0 o o (1) Jc: ~ O J 06 00 • rU) V ri / ^ E n E 0-0 U 0) a) c: E -E E 06 0 F W •E E 0 L U 0) C .E a) Jc: 0 J ~ '0 n QL 0 (D C: (D a) p E E O M x O 00 O M U N y O U of w„EqT ITEM NO: o o ~O[ORADO m REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 8, 2003 TITLE: AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE FROM AGRICULTURAL-ONE TO PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 10285 RIDGE ROAD, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. (CASE NO. WZ-02-13) ® PUBLIC HEARING ❑ ORDINANCES FOR 1 ST READING ❑ BIDS/MOTIONS ® ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING (Date: Sept 8, 2003) ❑ RESOLUTIONS Quasi-Judicial: ® ❑ Yes No Community Development Director City Manager EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Melody Homes, Inc. is requesting approval of a rezoning from Agricultural-One to Planned Residential Development and Planned Industrial Development and approval of an outline development plan for property located at 10285 Ridge Road. The site is currently vacant. The purpose of the request is to establish the zoning to allow the property to be developed with 37 single family residential lots and one industrial lot. At their meeting on July 17, 2003, Planning Commission recommended approval with conditions. COMMISSION/BOARD RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission reviewed this case at a public hearing held on July 17, 2003. A recommendation of approval was made with the following conditions: 1. The residential zoning shall be subject to the City's parkland fee in lieu of land dedication at the time of final plat. 2. Building height in the PID shall be limited to 35 feet. 3. Use numbers 10, 18, 19, 37, 38 and 48 shall be removed as permitted uses from the PID. 4. The height of accessory structures be limited to 12 feet. 5. All references to "blue grass sod" in the application be changed to "sod". No one from the audience spoke in regards to the application. STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES: The conditions recommended by Planning Commission as stated above have been agreed to by Melody Homes. The condition regarding the requirement of a parkland fee in lieu of land dedication should be perpetuated as a condition of approval. Modifications have been made to the outline development plan addressing conditions 2-5. Condition #2 recommends eliminating specific uses from the list of permitted uses for the industrial zoning. The eliminated uses are as follows: 10. Building contractor's service shop and storage yard incidental to an office/showroom principal use. This shall include carpenters, painters, roofers, electricians, plumbers, heating and air conditioning contractors and similar uses as approved by the Director of Community Development. 18. Electrical supplies and service. 19. Equipment rental agencies. 37. Lumber yards and building supply stores. 38. Manufacturing, processing, assembly or light industrial operations. 48. Research laboratories, offices and facilities for research. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: Do not approve the rezoning request. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The City has received a one-time application fee for the rezoning and outline plan. The zoning for the industrial lot has a permitted list of mainly commercial uses. Depending on the actual use developed, sales tax revenue could be generated. The City will receive a fee in lieu of parkland dedication and a one-time fee for a building permit application for each single family home constructed. There will be property tax revenue generated from the new homes, however, the benefit is negligible considering the services that will be provided by the City. The new residents may shop in the City of Wheat Ridge adding to sales tax revenue, though it is more likely that most shopping will occur at businesses in closest proximity in the City of Arvada. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to APPROVE Council Bill No. 34-2003, Case No. WZ-02-13, a request for a rezoning of property located at 10285 Ridge Road from Agricultural-One to Planned Residential Development and Planned Industrial Development and I further move to approve the outline development plan, and that this action take effect 15 days after final publication for the following reasons: 1. The requirements of the City's Planned Development regulations have been met. 2. The rezoning will not adversely impact the public health, safety or welfare. 3. The zone change is compatible with the surrounding area and the adjacent zoning of residential to the north and west as well as the adjacent zoning of industrial to the south and west. 4. A change in character of the area has occurred due to the zone changes on adjoining property to the north and west. 5. There are physical benefits to be derived from the construction of public improvements and a tree lawn along Ridge Road. 6. Adequate infrastructure will be constructed with the development to serve the proposed use. with the following condition: 1. The residential zoning shall be subject to the City's parkland fee in lieu of land dedication at the time of final plat." Or, "I move to table indefinitely Council Bill No. 34-2003, Case No. WZ-02-13, a request for a rezoning of property located at 10285 Ridge Road from Agricultural-One to Planned Residential Development and Planned Industrial Development and the outline development plan, with the following findings: 1. 2." Report Prepared by: Mary Austin (303) 235-2852 Reviewed by: Meredith Reckert (303) 235-2848 Attachments: 1. Planning Commission report with exhibits 2. Council Bill No. 34-2003 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission DATE OF MEETING: July 17, 2003 DATE PREPARED: July 10, 2003 CASE NO. & NAME: WZ-02-13 / Melody Homes CASE MANAGER: Mary Austin ACTION REQUESTED: Rezone from A-1, Agricultural-One to PRD, Planned Residential Development and PID, Planned Industrial Development. Approval of an Outline Development Plan. LOCATION OF REQUEST: NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT(S): 10285 Ridge Road Melody Homes 11031 Sheridan Blvd. Westminster, CO 80020 NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER(S): State of Colorado APPROXIMATE AREA: 17.67 Acres (769,655.51 square feet) PRESENT ZONING: PRESENT LAND USE: SURROUNDING ZONING: SURROUNDING LAND USE: A-1, Agricultural Vacant land E: A-1 S: PID, Industrial N:, & W City of Arvada residential N: Residential E: Public S: Industrial W: Vacant: Approved for Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AER, Agricultural Estate Residential (1 unit/acre) DATE PUBLISHED: July 3, 2003 DATE POSTED: July 1, 2003 DATED LEGAL NOTICES SENT: July 3, 2003 ENTER INTO RECORD: (X) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) ZONING ORDINANCE (X) EXHIBITS ( ) SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS ( ) OTHER JURISDICTION: The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. ATTACHMENT I I. REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a zone change from A-1, Agricultural to PRD, Planned Residential Development and PID, Planned Industrial Development and approval of an Outline Development Plan for property located at 10285 Ridge Road. (Exhibit 1, Zoning Map) The purpose of the request is to allow for the development of the property into 37 single family residential lots and 1 industrial lot. The Outline Development Plan approval process will establish the zoning, permitted uses, development standards and general design parameters. Publication and noticing has taken place for the Final Development Plan and Final Plat to be heard at this same public hearing. However, due to a delay in approval of the final drainage report and Ridge Road design it is being requested that they be continued to the next Planning Commission meeting on August 7, 2003. II. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING The required neighborhood meeting was held on June 19, 2002. A copy of the meeting summary and the sign-in sheets (Exhibit 2) are included with this report. III. OUTLINE PLAN As part of the rezoning process the applicant has submitted the required Outline Development Plan (ODP). (Exhibit 3, Outline Development Plan) The property being rezoned is approximately 17.67 acres in size (769,655.51 sq. ft.). The property has frontage on Ridge Road (southern boundary) and W 54' Avenue (northern boundary). The property is currently zoned A-1, Agricultural. The site is, at the present, vacant land. It was formerly utilized as a tree farm. Of the total site area, 14.49 acres (82%) are to be zoned PRD, residential and 3.18 acres (18%) are to be zoned PID, industrial. Sheet 3 of the ODP shows the extent and location of the areas proposed for PRD and PID zoning. The PID zoning is delineated with a bold line and is located at the southwest comer of the property along Ridge Road. Sheet 2 of the ODP establishes the list of permitted uses and development standards for the PRD and PID zones. As required, the ODP site plan shows the conceptual layout of streets, drainage areas and open space tracts. The proposed lot lines and easements are also shown for a total of 38 lots to be created with a final plat document. Of these lots, 37 will be for residential use and 1 for industrial use. The layout of the residential and industrial areas is compatible with the residential and industrial locations in the adjacent Skyline Estates Filing 2 to the west. Filing 2 in the City of Planning Commission Page 2 WZ-02-13/Melody Homes Arvada creates an industrial area adjacent to Ridge Road with residential lots to the north. The development of the total site is planned to occur in two phases. The first phase will encompass the residential lots with associated improvements, streets, utilities, drainage improvements and all public improvements. The Final Development Plan and Final Plat have been submitted and are currently under final review prior to public hearing. The second phase will consist of the development of the industrial lot for which a final development plan will be submitted at a later date. Residential Component There will be a total of 37 residential lots. The permitted uses in the PRD zoning area are limited to single family residences and typical accessory structures such as sheds and detached garages. The permitted uses do not allow for any type of multi-family dwellings. Most of the development standards for the residential zoning refer to the appropriate section of the City's Zoning Code. The minimum lot size is being established at 7,900 square feet which is slightly larger than the City's R-1 B residential zoning district. The average lot size is approximately 0.25 acres in size. The minimum front setback of 20 feet is consistent with Skyline Estates Filings 1 and 2 in the City of Arvada. It does vary slightly from the standard of 30 feet required by the City's conventional residential zoning districts. However, additional design standards are being incorporated into the front setback requirement. A staggering of the front setback line is provided for in note #4 of the residential development standards. The front setback of homes shall vary between 20 to 25 feet with a minimum variation of 2.5 feet. This shall provide visual relief along the street frontage instead of having the homes built on the same setback line. Additional neighborhood aesthetics will be accomplished by requiring that no two homes with the same elevation and floor plan will be constructed on adjacent lots or lots across the street. Furthermore, there will not be two garage dominant models adjacent to each other. Other design standards aimed at increasing aesthetic appeal have been included in notes 2, 3 and 7 of the residential standards. An extensive amount of brick or stone will be included on each home facade. The first floor of each front elevation will be required to have a minimum of 50% brick or stone with a 4-foot return along each side. In order to break up the side plane of homes located on a corner lot or adjacent to an open space tract, those homes shall have a minimum of 2 windows on that side, trim board enhancements, and variation in siding material. Open space is being provided in the amount of 4.79 acres. This amounts to 27% of the total site. Some of the open space will also function as drainage features. Open space and drainage areas will be set up in tracts on the final plat document. Planning Commission Page 3 WZ-02-13/Melody Homes Industrial Component The PID zoning is proposed for a single industrial lot and a drainage tract. The list of allowed uses on the Outline Development Plan closely minors the City's C-1, Commercial-One district. Some of the potentially incompatible uses (such as auto repair and service, auto, recreational vehicle and trailer sales, flea markets and mini-warehouses) have been eliminated from the list. Some compatible uses permitted in the City's industrial district (such as greenhouses, nurseries and office/warehouse) have been included. The industrial development standards are consistent with the City's current code requirements. For most standards, a reference to the specific code section is made. The minimum landscaped area is established at 20% of the total site. In order to help protect the traffic pattern on Ridge Road and the residential neighborhood, access to the industrial parcel shall be from Oak Street only. The industrial standards require buffering and screening for parking areas. Any outdoor storage will have to be explicitly identified on an approved final development plan and function only as an accessory to a permitted use with screening requirements being met. The architectural design will be specifically detailed on the final development plan at the future time it is submitted for approval. Architectural standards established on this Outline Development Plan require exterior materials of brick, stone, wood and glass. Fenestration and articulation of the facade is also required. Metal buildings are expressly prohibited. IV. REZONING CRITERIA Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a zone change request. That the existing zone classification currently recorded on the official zoning maps of the City of Wheat Ridge is an error. The property is cunrently zoned A-1, Agricultural. There is no mistake on the zoning map. 2. That a change in the character in the area has occurred due to installation of public facilities, other zone changes, new growth trends, deterioration or development transitions. A change in character of the area has occurred on the adjacent properties to the north and west. The property to the north in the City of Arvada has been rezoned to residential and has been recently developed with single family homes. The property to the west in the City of Planning Commission WZ-02-13/Melody Homes Arvada has been approved for industrial zoning along Ridge Road, with the remainder of the property as residential. 3. That the change of zone is in conformance, or will bring the property into conformance, with the City of Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan goals, objectives and policies, and other related policies or plans for the area. The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map designates the property as AER Agricultural Estate Residential 1 unit/acre. The proposed zoning of industrial and single family residential is not in direct conformance with this designation. To be economically viable a greater residential density is being proposed. Based on the total site area a gross density of 2.09 dwellings per acre is proposed. Considering the residential area to be platted into 37 lots, the net density is proposed at the rate of 2.55 dwellings per acre. While this density exceeds the recommendation of the Comprehensive Plan it is not disproportionate to the surrounding residential density. The Comprehensive Plan does designate the area on the south side of Ridge Road, across the street from this property, as BP, Planned Business/Industrial Parks. The proposed industrial zone on the north side of Ridge Road is compatible with this designation. Considering the surrounding land uses, staff concludes that it is unlikely that the site will be developed with a low density residential use. The boundaries established on the future land use map are meant to be somewhat flexible. While the proposal is not in strict conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, the adjacent land uses of industrial and single family residential should be considered. 4. That the proposed change of zone is compatible with the surrounding area and there will be minimal adverse impacts considering the benefits to be derived. The change of zone will be compatible with the surrounding area. The industrial zoning along Ridge Road is compatible with the industrial zoning across Ridge Road to the south. The residential zoning will be consistent with the single family residential zoning to the north and west in the City of Arvada. 5. That there will be social, recreational, physical and/or economic benefits to the community derived by the change of zone. There could potentially be economic benefits associated with the area identified for industrial zoning in the form of additional revenue to the City. There are physical benefits associated with the construction of public improvements along Ridge Road. These improvements will include a detached sidewalk and tree lawn as identified in the City's Streetscape and Architectural Design Manual. Planning Commission Page 5 WZ-02-13/Melody Homes Other than the one-time fees and taxes, the economic benefit to the City will be minimal. Property tax revenue is low considering the services the City will be required to provide to the new residences. Additionally, residents may shop in Wheat Ridge but a good portion of retail shopping will likely occur in Arvada due to the close proximity of Arvada businesses. 6. That adequate infrastructure/facilities are available to serve the type of uses allowed by the change of zone, or that the applicant will upgrade and provide such where they do not exist or are under capacity. All utility providers will serve the property with improvements constructed at the developer's expense. Tracts will be provided for on-site drainage features according to the final drainage plan. That the change of zone will not adversely affect public health, safety or welfare by creating excessive traffic congestion, creating drainage problems, or seriously reducing light and air to adjacent properties. The traffic impact study has been reviewed and approved to assure that the increase in traffic from the residential and industrial development is accounted for. Setbacks are established with the development standards to protect the amount of light and air available to adjacent properties. 8. That the change of zone will not create an isolated or spot zone district unrelated to adjacent or nearby areas. Both the PRD and PID zoning as proposed will be compatible with surrounding property. The rezoning will not create an isolated zone district of either residential or industrial. The industrial area will be adjacent to industrial zoning to the south and west. The residential zoning will be adjacent to similar single family residential zoning to the north and west. V. AGENCY REFERRALS All outside service agencies will serve the property when developed. Arvada Fire District will serve the property. A traffic impact study has been reviewed and approved by the City's Traffic Engineer. All public improvements required for the safe movement of vehicles will be constructed by the developer. A final drainage report and plan is in the process of being reviewed in conjunction with the final plat and final development plan. Public improvements along Ridge Road will be required as part of the final plat and final development plan. Planning Commission Page 6 WZ-02-13/Melody Homes The Parks and Recreation Department has requested fee in lieu for parkland dedication. VI. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION Staff concludes that although inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of agricultural estate residential, there has been such a change of character in the surrounding area as to warrant the proposed zone change. Therefore, staff recommends Approval of Case No. WZ-02-13 with a condition that the parkland fee in lieu of land dedication be required at time of final plat. VII. RECOMMENDED MOTIONS Option A: "I move that Case No. WZ-02-13, a request for approval of a zone change from A-1, Agricultural to PRD, Planned Residential Development and PID, Planned Industrial Development and approval of an outline development plan for property located at 10285 Ridge Road, be APPROVED for the following reasons: 1. The requirements of the City's Planned Development Regulations have been met. 2. The rezoning will not adversely impact the public health, safety or welfare. 3. The zone change is compatible with the surrounding area and the adjacent zoning of residential to the north and west as well as the adjacent zoning of industrial to the south and west. 4. A change in character of the area has occurred due to the zone changes on adjoining property to the north and west. 5. There are physical benefits to be derived from the construction of public improvements and a tree lawn along Ridge Road. 6. Adequate infrastructure will be constructed with the development to serve the proposed use. With the following condition: 1. The residential zoning shall be subject to the City's parkland fee in lieu of land dedication at the time of final plat. Option B: "I move that Case No. WZ-02-13, a request for approval of a zone change from A-1, Agricultural to PRD, Planned Residential Development and PID, Planned Industrial Development and approval of an outline development plan for property located at 10285 Ridge Road, be DENIED for the following reasons: 1. 2. Planning Commission Page 7 WZ-02-13/Melody Homes I S iTE 3 z ARVADA 5E 16 OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WHEAT RIDGE COLORADO PARCEULOT BOUNDARY (DESIGINATES OWNERSHIP) WATER FEATURE - DENOTES MULTIPLE ADDRESSES 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN (APPROXIMATE LOCATION) NE 16 !Qc DEPARTMENT OF MAP ADOPTED June 15, 1994 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Last Revisor: SepWnbW 10. 2001 FXHIRIT i 7500 West 29" Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215 City of Wheat Ridge Telephone (303) 235-2846 Fax(103)235-2857 Neighborhood Meeting Summary Date: June 19, 2002 City Staff Present: Mary Austin, Planner Michael Garcia, Development Review Engineer U Location of Meeting: Wheat Ridge Municipal Building, 2" floor conference room Property Address: Property Owner Applicant: Existing Zoning 10285 Ridge Road Sate of Colorado Melody Homes A-1 Property Owner Present? No Applicant Present? Yes Comp Plan Designation: AER (1 unit/acre) Existing use/site conditions: Vacant land Applicants proposal: To rezone the property from A-1 to PRD and PID and receive approval of an Outline Development Plan, Final Development Plan and Final Plat. The applicant intends to develop the site with 37 single family residential homes and an industrial area along Ridge Road. Issues discussed: Questions were posed regarding plans for the industrial area. Melody Homes commented that the industrial area is planned to be compatible with the industrial area in the City of Arvada along Ridge Road. It is not planned to be an intensive manufacturing area. The industrial area will p\most likely not be a part of the homeowners association. Maintenance of Ridge Road: The road is entirely within the City of Wheat Ridge and will be maintained by Wheat Ridge. Questions were raised about the keeping of large animals on the residential lots. Melody Homes responded that the covenants will likely prohibit large animals and they will not be listed as a permitted use. Traffic circulation: A traffic impact study will be required to be submitted by Melody Homes and approved by the City. EXHIBIT 2 CO co -I C) U7 A W N O co r z III 0 W r r 0 e u W O W I r p d w Vi 0 Vl N s W Iz a) m D CL CL N N S 7 r z D X m (n m m p 2 ~ cn ~ z z ~ m W p Z z D z M M a v = E m cn W 3 0 m -mi o N v m ~ m vi m o -1 z Z G) CO co V 0) U1 A W N z a1 I I ~y 1 1-' Z til p~ m D a m p 2 N z z rn O N ~ ~ z ? m ~ o 2 > z y " - CL cn = O m M o W 3 M cca m ~ m o -i z Z O u w q W o 1 ~1 v INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER Council Bill No. 34-2003 Ordinance No. Series of 2003 TITLE: AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE FROM AGRICULTURAL-ONE TO PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 10285 RIDGE ROAD, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1. Upon application by Melody Homes, Inc, approval of a zone change in Wheat Ridge, Colorado, Case No. WZ-02-13, and based on recommendation of approval from the Wheat Ridge Planning Commission and pursuant to findings made based on testimony and evidence presented at a public hearing before the Wheat Ridge City Council, Wheat Ridge maps are hereby amended to exclude from the Agricultural-One District and to include in the Planned Residential Development District and the Planned Industrial Development District the following described land: ALL THAT PART OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO, LYING NORTH OF THE COUNTY ROAD KNOWN AS RIDGE ROAD, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 16, THENCE NORTH 00° 13'11" WEST, ON AND ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4, A DISTANCE OF 71.25 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF RIDGE ROAD, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 00°13' 11" WEST ON AND ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST''/,, A DISTANCE OF 1246.20 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4; THENCE NORTH 89°35'34" EAST, ON AND ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, A DISTANCE OF 665.06 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4; THENCE SOUTH 00°12'59" EAST, ON AND ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 114, A DISTANCE OF 1068.47 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID RIDGE ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 74°38'30" WEST, ON AND ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 688.90 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ATTACHMENT 2 Section 2. Vested Property Rights. Approval of this zone change does not create a vested property right. Vested property rights may only arise and accrue pursuant to the provisions of Section 26-121 of the Code of Laws of the City of Wheat Ridge. Section 3. Safety Clause. The City Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is promulgated under the general police power of the City of Wheat Ridge, that it is promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare of the public and that this ordinance is necessary for the preservation of health and safety and for the protection of public convenience and welfare. The City Council further determines that the ordinance bears a rational relation to the proper legislative object sought to be attained. Section 4. Severability. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, or part of this Zoning Code or the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall for any reason be adjusted by a court of competent jurisdiction invalid, such judgment shall not affect application to other persons or circumstances. Section 5. Supersession Clause. If any provision, requirement or standard established by this Ordinance is found to conflict with similar provisions, requirements or standards found elsewhere in the Code of Laws of the City of Wheat Ridge, which are in existence as of the date of adoption of this Ordinance, the provisions, requirements and standards herein shall supersede and prevail. Section 6. This ordinance shall take effect 15 days after final publication. INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first reading by a vote of _ to on this 11' day of August, 2003, ordered published in full in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Wheat Ridge and Public Hearing and consideration on final passage set for September 8, 2003, at 7:00 o'clock p.m., in the Council Chambers, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final reading by a vote of to , this day of 2003 SIGNED by the Mayor on this day of 2003 GRETCHEN CERVENY, MAYOR ATTEST: Wanda Sang, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM BY CITY ATTORNEY GERALD DAHL, CITY ATTORNEY 1st Publication: 2nd Publication: Wheat Ridge Transcript Effective Date: WFiE4T Q DEVELOPMENT lCOMMUNITY m MEMORANDUM CORA00 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Mary Austin, Planner SUBJECT: Case # WZ-02-13 / Melody Homes FDP Case # WS-02-01 / Melody Homes Final Plat DATE: 8/29/2003 CC: Case File A request is being made for continuance of the Final Development Plan (WZ-02-13) and Final Plat (WS-02-01) to the next Planning Commission meeting. Staff is recommending that Case # WZ-02-13 and Case # WS-02-01 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting on September 18, 2003. Recommended Motion: "I move that Case No. WZ-02-13, a request for approval of a final development plan, and Case No. WS-02-01, a request for approval of a 38-lot major subdivision plat, for property located at 10285 Ridge Road, be CONTINUED to September 18, 2003." PSQ FLOOOc el 2 a o rt ~ O O ~bgbn . 1O\dyc Board of Directors Executive Committee: Beverly Bradshaw Chairman City of Englewood Debra Vickrey Chairman Pro-Tem Arapahoe County Paul Danish Secretary Boulder County Gretchen Cerveny Treasurer City of Wheat Ridge Elaine Valente Member at Large Adams County Members: Steve Burkholder City of Lakewood Noel Busck City of Thornton Ken Fellman City of Arvada Stephanie Foote City/County of Denver B. H. HoBmaster Engineer Michelle Lawrence Jefferson County Kathleen MacKenzie City/County of Denver W. Mike Maxwell Douglas County Bart Miller City of Centennial Deborah Ortega City/County of Denver Art Patton Engineer Cathy Reynolds City/County of Denver Susan Spence Town of Superior Karen Stuart City/County of Broomfield Ed Tauer City of Aurora L. Scott Tucker, Executive Director August 28, 2003 Alan White, Director of Community Development O 0 0 U Z 0 a a Z 0 r a David F. Brossman, P.L.S. City of Wheat Ridge ?500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Dear Mr. White and Mr. Brossman: v° We were recently requested to comment on a proposal called Skyline Estates Filing No. 3. We were happy to do that, and in fact encourage local governments to refer proposed developments with drainage issues to us for review and comment. I would like to request that, in the future, the referrals from Wheat Ridge come from the City, rather than from the developer or his engineer. We ask this for several reasons: 1. There are 39 local governments within the boundaries of the District, and we would like to limit referrals to those 39 local governments, rather than from a significant larger number of developers and their engineers. 2. We would like to know that the local government is aware of the documents we are reviewing, and in fact that we are reviewing the same documents the local government is reviewing. 3. We would like to know when you require a response, and not when the developer would like our response. 4. We have a District maintenance eligibility program for drainage facilities constructed by others. The decision to pursue maintenance eligibility rests with the local governments and not with developers. Therefore, we need to hear from you as to whether you want to pursue eligibility for a given project. To reiterate, we encourage local governments to refer proposed developments to us for review and comment. We do request that those referrals come from you rather than from the developer or his engineer. If you have any questions regarding any of the above, please feel free to contact me at any time. Sincerely, 4eG B. Chief, Floodplain Management Program W GD/mc flood\bill\wheatridge VUNJ TRANSMITTAL August 28, 2003 TO: Steve Nguyen, PE Engineering Manager City of Wheat Ridge 7500 West 29's Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Telephone: 303-235-2852 FROM: Bill Archdeacon (303-694-2300 ext. 320) CC: Mary Austin, City of Wheat Ridge (with enclosures) Darrel Pennington, Melody Homes (with enclosures) File M0203120 (with enclosures) RE: Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 VIA: KM delivery As requested we have enclosed the following for your use: • Traffic Impact Analysis (2 bound signed and sealed copies) • Letter from Jeremy Hahn, Kirkham Michael dated August 28, 2003 According to conversations today with Jeremy Hahn this suffices for your full approval of the Traffic Impact Analysis Please advise either Jeremy Hahn or myself should you have any concerns. Thanks for your help. Enclosures: Letter from Jeremy Hahn, Kirkham Michael dated August 28, 2003 Kirkham Michael 5600 South Quebec Street, Suite 200D Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111-2204 303-694-2300 Fax: 303-694-2822 KIRKHAM W MICHAEL Arizona • Colorado Iowa • Kansas • Nebraska CONSULTING ENGINEERS August 28, 2003 Mr. Steve Nguyen City of Wheat Ridge - Traffic Engineering 7500 West 29t1i Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215 RE: Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 - KM # 020312 Addendum #1 Dear Mr. Nguyen: www.kirkham.com Per your request, Kirkham Michael has completed an addendum to the Skyline Estates Filing #3 Traffic Impact Analysis dated August 2003. The purpose of this addendum is to provide discussion regarding the two analysis assumptions contained in the report. The traffic study was completed utilizing two assumptions. The first assumed that Parfet Street would extend from its current terminus to Ridge Road on the south. The second analysis scenario assumed that Parfet Street would not extend to Ridge Road. In the Parfet connection to Ridge scenario the "worst case" was assumed when assigning and distributing the Skyline Estates Filing #3 site traffic. Oak Street was not included in the trip distribution (See Figure 4, page 13) in order to estimate the highest amount of traffic at the Parfet Street/Ridge Road intersection. Even with the increased site traffic at the Parfet Street access, the intersection still operates with acceptable LOS during both the AM and PM peak hours. Consequently, in the second scenario a worst case traffic assignment was assumed at the Oak Street/Ridge Road intersection. The analysis also showed that the intersection operates with acceptable LOS during both the AM and PM peak hours. If you have any questions regarding the addendum, feel free to call me at 303-694-2300. Thank you. Sincerely, KIRKHAM MICHAEL CONS 'G ENGINEERS emy Ha Traffic Engineer JRH 5600 South Quebec Street • Suite 200 D • Greenwood Village, CO 80111 • (303) 694-2300 • FAX (303) 694-2822 TRANSMITTAL August 28, 2003 TO: Mary Austin Planner City of Wheat Ridge 7500 West 29 ° Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Telephone: 303-235-2852 FROM: Bill Archdeacon (303-694-2300 ext. 320) ?A CC: Darrel Pennington, Melody Homes (with enclosures) File M0203120 RE: Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 VIA: KM delivery As requested we have enclosed the following plans for your use: • Final Plat (18 full size sets and 1 - 11'x17" reduction) • Final Development Plan (18 full size sets and 1 - 11'x17" reduction) • Outline Development Plan (23 full size sets and 1 - 11'x17' reduction) • Urban Drainage and Flood Control District approval letter dated August 28, 2003 Please advise either Katie Christopher or myself should you have any concerns. Thanks for your help. Darrel Pennington enclosures: • Final Plat (1 full size set and 1 - 11'x17' reduction) • Final Development Plan (1 full size set and 1 - 11'x17' reduction) • Outline Development Plan (1 full size set and 1 - 11'x17' reduction) • Urban Drainage and Flood Control District approval letter dated August 28, 2003 Kirkham Michael 5600 South Quebec Street, Suite 200D Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111-2204 303-694-2300 Fax: 303-694-2822 AUG 28 '03 09:46AM URBAN DRAINAGE PNo PLO 00 z 1 -',r, IY1 A 2 C 260&0. L01 Boara of Daeaora Executive Committee. W Beverly Bradshaw Chairman City of Englewood p Debra V¢krey c Chairman Pro-Tam d Arapahoe County u Paul Dan'th Secretary Boulder County Gretchen Cerveny m Treeeurer ,e City of Wheat Ridge Elalne Valente U Member at Large Adams County Z Members a Steve Burkholder City of Lakewood Noel Bueck q City of Thornton Ken Fellman City of Arvada Stephanie FooIC 0 ,ey/County of Denver 3 B. H. HOamaster , Engineer , Michelle Lawrence n Jefferson County Kathleen MacKenzie " y1counly of Denver r1 VV. Millie Maxwell Douglas Count LL Batt Miller City of Centennial l: fa Deborah Ortega U :,tytcounty of Denver i 4 Art Patton Engineer 0 Catty Roynol ]~tyrCOUnly of Denver er Susan Spence Town of Superior Karen Swart City/County of Broomtlela Ea Tauer City of Aurora L. Scott Tucker, ExeCUUVC 01rector August 28, 2003 David F. Brossman, P L.S. City of Wheat Ridge Development Review Engineer 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Dear Mr- Brossman: P. 212 This letter is in regard to Skyline Estates Filing No. 3. I have received from the engineer a revised drainage report dated August, 2003. That report addresses my comments as outlined in a letter to you dated August 11, 2003, with the exception of District maintenance eligibility. Maintenance eligibility does not have to be decided at this time, but I would encourage the City of Wheat Ridge to pursue maintenance eligibility so that maintenance assistance can be requested in future years if the need anses. I have enclosed a copy of our guidelines for your information and use. If you have any questions concerning the above, please contact me Sincerely, r Bil e Co4P. Chief, Floodplain Management Program W GD/mc Enclosure flood\b0l\whcartid9c +k b t 6. PUBLIC FORUM There were none present to address the Commission during this portion of the meeting. PUBLIC HEARINGS ( A. Case No. WZ-02-13 (continued from August 7, 2003): An application filed by I Melody Homes, Inc. for approval of a Planned Residential Development final ~V development plan for property located at 10285 Ridge Road. B. Case No. WS-02-01 (continued from August 7, 2003): An application filed by Melody Homes, Inc. for approval of a 38-lot subdivision plat for property located at 10285 Ridge Road. It was moved by Commissioner BERRY and seconded by Commissioner STITES to continue Case No. WZ-02-13 and Case No. WS-02-01 to the meeting of September 4, 2003. The motion passed 5-0 with Commissioners McMILLIN, WEISZ and WITT absent. C. Case No. WZ-02-03: An application filed by Wayne and Alice Hinkle for approval of a rezoning from Agricultural-Two to Planned Commercial Development for property located at 12060 West 52nd Avenue. This case was presented by Travis Crane. He entered all pertinent documents into the record and advised the Commission there was jurisdiction to hear the case. He reviewed the staff report and digital presentation. Staff recommended approval for reasons outlined in the staff report. In response to a question from Commissioner BERRY, Travis Crane replied that the application was referred to the City of Arvada, however no response was received. Alice Hinkle Wayne Hinkle 3420 Garland Street The applicants, Alice and Wayne Hinkle, were sworn in by Chair McNAMEE. They stated they had nothing to add to the staff presentation and offered to answer questions from the Commission. There were no questions from the Commissioners. There was no one present from the public to speak to this request. It was moved by Commissioner DAVIS and seconded by Commissioner PLUMMER to recommend approval of Case No. WZ-02-03, a request for approval of an Outline Development Plan for property located at 12060 West 52°d Avenue, for the following reasons: 1. The zone change is compatible with the land use of the surrounding area and there will be minimal adverse impacts to the surrounding area. 2. The change of zone will not adversely affect the public health, safety or welfare. Planning Commission Page 2 August 21, 2003 t C3y of Wheat Mdge DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS nepatrm t of Pubk works 7500 WEST 29' AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 August 19, 2003 Mr. William C. Archdeacon, P.E. Kirkham Michael Consulting Engineers 5600 South Quebec Street, Suite 200D Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111 (303) 235-2868 FAX (303) 235-2857 Re: Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 - Fourth Review of the Grading & Erosion Control Plan, Third Review Comments of the Street Construction Plans, Storm Sewer Plans, and First Review Comments for the Ridge Road Construction Plan and Underdrain Plan. Dear Mr. Archdeacon, I have completed the first review of the above referenced documents for the Skyline Estates Subdivision received on July 21, 2003, and have the following comments: RIDGE ROAD CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR ALL SHEETS: Provide a P.E. seal and signature. Sheet 1: L Note 14 needs to be modified to read: "SURVEY ROW MONUMENTS SHALL BE SET PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE FINAL LIFT OF ASPHALT PAVEMENT. MONUMENT HARDWARE SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE UPON REQUEST." 2. Under the Basis of Bearing statement, the monument located at the NW comer of the SW 1/4 of the NE'/4 of Section 16 is shown to be stamped PLS 27601. The monument is stated as being stamped PLS 19003 on all of the other sheets in this set of plans, as well as the Final Development Plan and Final, Plat previously submitted. Please modify as necessary to make this statement accurate and consistent between all documents. Sheet 2: 1. Include the City boundaries (darken & make it a different linetype than property lines). 2. Identify the different subdivisions, e.g., Skyline Estates Filings #2 and Filing #3. 3. Differentiate between the items to be constructed with Skyline Filing #2 and this project. 4. Show the Limits of Construction. 5. Include baseline information (including a tie to the Section), & show the 1/4 Section Comer monument as redlined. 6. A ROW monument is to be set at the centerline ROW intersection of Nelson Street and Ridge Road. Show the placement of this monument, and refer the reader to Note 14 on Sheet 1. 7. Identify the asphalt planning/overlay area, and provide a different shading type (visual aid) for the area. 8. Change the 60' NEW ROW to 60' ROW RECEPTION NUMBER F1738743. 9. The fillet area is to be constructed at the northeast comer of Parfet Street. Please draw a line showing it and include language stating it is to be constructed. 10. Add the words "TO BE RELOCATED" under the existing overhead electric poles. 11. Correct the Book and Page for the ROW for the Drainage Channel and Detention Facility along the easterly side of Skyline Filing #3. 12. Identify the 7.5' Landscape (tree-lawn) Area (between the back of curb and the front of sidewalk). Sheet 3: 1. Include the City boundaries (darken & make it a different linetype than property lines). 2. Identify the different subdivisions, e.g., Skyline Estates Filings #2 and Filing #3. 3. Differentiate between the items to be constructed with Skyline Filing #2 and this project. 4. Show the Limits of Construction. 5. Identify the 7.5' Landscape (tree-lawn) Area (between the back of curb and the front of sidewalk). 6. Show new 6" vertical curb as TYPE CG2 (TYP). 7. On the plan view, identify the location of the proposed crown. 8. Include the City boundaries in the vicinity map. 9. Change the 60' NEW ROW to 60' ROW RECEPTION NUMBER F1738743. 10. Indicate station 2+00 as the location at which the asphalt planning/overlay area begins (show a 2" butt-joint at 2+00). 11. Draw and identify the fillet area located at the northeast corner of Parfet as to be constructed at the time of ramp (monolithic pour). Need to adjust the profile to reflect this. 12. On the profile, show all grade percents (as show on redlined plans). For areas where the grade . change is over 0.50%, a vertical curve shall be required (refer to p. 470, AASHTO 1990, for K- values - for 35 mph, Class 5 Arterial Roadway). 13. In order to have the best ride quality, the proposed crown profile and cross-slopes north of the proposed crown need to be as consistent as possible. The criteria to be considered in the design is as follows: a. Cross-slope in asphalt planning/overlay area should be between 1.5% and 2.5%. b. The cross-slope north of the proposed crown (new pavement section) should be between 2.0& and 3.0%. c. Let the cross-slope south of the new proposed crown "float" if necessary to achieve a more consistent cross-slope on the north side of the new proposed crown. Need to keep the longitudinal profile as consistent as possible as well (as few grade breaks as possible) to achieve the best ride quality. 14. Include Notes directing the reader to the Detail Sheet(s) for inlet and ramp details, and for Typical Section. 15. In the profile, change "NEW PAN LINE" to "NEW LIP OF GUTTER", and "NEW PAN ELEV" to "LIP ELEV. Sheet 4: 1. Include the City boundaries (darken & make it a different linetype than property lines). 2. Identify the different subdivisions, e.g., Skyline Estates Filings 92 and Filing 93. 3. Differentiate between the items to be constructed with Skyline Filing #2 and this project. 4. Show the Limits of Construction. 5. Change the 60' NEW ROW to 60' ROW RECEPTION NUMBER F1738743. 6. Identify the 75 Landscape (tree-lawn) Area (between the back of curb and the front of sidewalk). 7. Show new 6" vertical curb as TYPE CG2 (TYP). 8. On the plan view, identify the location of the proposed crown. 9. Include the City boundaries in the vicinity map. 10. Include the words "TO BE REMOVED" for the existing fence. 11. In the profile, change "NEW PAN LINE" to "NEW LIP OF GUTTER", and "NEW PAN ELEV" to "LIP ELEV. 12. Include Notes directing the reader to the Detail Sheet(s) for cross-pan and ramp details, and for Typical Section. 13. Clearly identify drainage easement lines. Sheet 5: 1. Show the Limits of Construction. 2. Add the text - Skyline Estates Filing #3 Subdivision (better defines the construction location). 3. Identify the 7.5' Landscape (tree-lawn) Area (between the back of curb and the front of sidewalk). 4. Show new 6" vertical curb as TYPE CG2 (TYP). 5. On the plan view, identify the location of the proposed crown. 6. Include the City boundaries in the vicinity map. 7. Change the 60' NEW ROW to 60' ROW RECEPTION NUMBER F1738743. 8. In the profile, change "NEW PAN LINE" to "NEW LIP OF GUTTER', and "NEW PAN ELEV" to "LIP ELEV. 9. Include Notes directing the reader to the Detail Sheet(s) for cross-pan, ramp, and inlet details, and for Typical Section. 10. For areas where the grade change is over 0.50%, a vertical curve shall be required (refer to p. 470, AASHTO 1990, for K-values - for 35 mph; Class 5 Arterial Roadway). 11. At the centerline ROW intersection of Nelson Street and Ridge Road, a survey monument is to be set. Please add language addressing this, and directing the reader to Note 14, Sheet 1. Sheet 6: 1. Show the Limits of Construction. 2. Add the text - Skyline Estates Filing #3 Subdivision (better defines the construction location). 3. Identify the 7.5' Landscape (tree-lawn) Area (between the back of curb and the front of sidewalk). 4. Show new 6" vertical curb as TYPE CG2 (TYP). 5. On the plan view, identify the location of the proposed crown. 6. Include the City boundaries in the vicinity map. 7. Change the 60' NEW ROW to 60' ROW RECEPTION NUMBER F1738743. 8. In the profile, change "NEW PAN LINE" to "NEW LIP OF GUTTER", and "NEW PAN ELEV" to "LIP ELEV". 9. Correct the Book and Page for the ROW for the Drainage Channel and Detention Facility along the easterly side of Skyline Filing #3. 10. The curb & gutter needs to be constructed for the entire frontage (perpendicular to the property line along Ridge Road). 11. The riprap does not to be extended all the way to the end off the curb & gutter (edge of asphalt). 12. A concrete channel or swale shall be constructed at the end of the curb & gutter, and have a sufficient length as to direct the flows into the main channel. 13. Include Notes directing the reader to the respective detail sheet(s) for the asphalt planing/overlay detail, for the swale/riprap area at the easterly end of the curb & gutter, and the Typical Section. 14. Please add a note to flow fill (concrete) and cap existing 12" culvert to be abandoned. Sheet 7: 1. For the Ridge Road Typical Section: a. Correct the line (should extend from the front of the walk to the back of curb) and include a description for the 7.5' Landscape (tree-lawn) Area. b. Indicate the asphalt planning / overlay area. c. Change the 2.0% fall across the detached sidewalk to (Concrete contractors have a much better understanding of inches and feet). d. Show the 3 lifts of asphalt as 4" Grade C, 3" Grade C, and top lift as 2" Grade CX, as indicated on the redlined plan. e. Show Subgrade compaction as 100% of maximum density in accordance with AASHTO T-99 specifications. 2. Regarding the 6.5' Mountable Curb with Sidewalk detail, MS4 is the only type allowed for new developments. Please remove any information that does not pertain to the MS4 standard. 3. The same type of modification will need to be done for the Vertical Curb & Gutter detail. If no other types other than Type CG2 are to be constructed, please remove for plan clarity. 4. For the.Asphah Planing & HBP Overlay Section: a. Unless the planning is to occur in areas abutting concrete, remove the text concerning this and add the correct material (e.g., existing asphalt pavement). b. Unless a geotextile to be used, this information should be removed as well (this is a "boilerplate type of detail the City uses for many different areas for a given project, and is not necessary if not to be used). c. Add the following Notes: i. Asphalt Planing shall be performed at such a width and depth necessary to achieve a uniform and consistent 2" minimum depth of HBP Overlay. ii. All Asphalt Planing shall be performed parallel to the flow of traffic unless otherwise approved by the City Inspector. iii. A correction or leveling course may be required prior to the final lift of asphalt placement. iv. Removal of asphalt pavement (planning) shall be accomplished by the use of an approved planning machine or grinder. v. Asphalt Planing shall result in a surface acceptable to the City Inspector based upon the following criteria: 1. Free of surface ridges in excess of 1/4 2. Planed surfaces parallel to lane lines. 3. Surface area free of excess surface fines. 4. All planed surfaces, especially wheel ruts, show scoring by planning teeth. 5. The Ramp Detail will need to be a modified version of either the City standard CR2 or CR3 Ramp Detail. Please find attached to the comment letter an example of a modified Type CR3 to accommodate a detached 5' sidewalk. The ramp detail needs to reflect exactly what is to be constructed. 6. The Cross-pan at Corner Ramp Detail needs to reflect what is to be constructed. Again, the City's details are provided as a "boilerplate" and are to be modified as needed for each development. The hatching for the fillet area, and the fillet delineating line, can be removed due to the fact that cross-pans are to be constructed at all intersections on this development. The depth of the concrete is to be 10" from PCR to PCR around the fillet area, and 10" for all of 8' cross-pan. 7. Same for the Detached Sidewalk Detail. Boilerplate, please revise to match what is to be constructed. Sheet 8: 1. Median areas are NOT to be painted as shown. 2. Centerline markings are all to be Double-Yellow. This includes area of the median bubbles. 3. Round the nose of the median bubbles as shown on the redlined plans. 4. Include white turn arrows at intersections as shown on the redlined plans. 5. Correct spelling errors as shown on the redlined plans. 6. Include details for: a. Median Bubble (TYP) b. Lane Widths 0 8~rE5NMB~ c. Materials to be used (e.g., paint types, B' mbol, turn lane arrow specs, etc.). Sheets 9-13- 1. No comments for cross-section sheets. Sheet 14: 1. Add the word FUTURE to the northwest curb return profile for Parfet Street. 2. Double-check the elevations as indicated on redlines for the northeast Parfet, and for the northwest Nelson Street curb return profiles. Sheet 15: 1. Need to angle the pipe for Storm Serer Line W more downstream. 2. Show the V-Type low flow trickle channel on both Line Wand Line E profile views. 3. Include flow line of grate elevations for the curb inlets. Sheet 16: 1. Modify the Columbine Low-Flow Channel to reflect the V-Type as used in the Final Drainage Report & Plan. STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION PLANS Please provide PE. seal and signature on all sheets. Sheet l: 1. Note 14 needs to be modified to read: "SURVEY ROW MONUMENTS SHALL BE SET PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE FINAL LIFT OF ASPHALT PAVEMENT. MONUMENT HARDWARE SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE UPON REQUEST." 2. For Note #15, please remove the word DITCH as shown on the redline plan Sheet 2: 1. Modify (and identify) the Drainage Easement along the westerly line of the industrial lot (Lot 1, Block 4) to match the easement as shown on the Final Plat. 2. The 5' sidewalk along Ridge Road is currently shown as being in a 5' ROW. Change ROW to EASEMENT. Sheet 3: 1. For Note #6, please remove the word DITCH as shown on the redline plan. Sheet 4: 1. For Note #6, please remove the word DITCH as shown on the redline plan. Sheet 5: 1. For Note #6, please remove the word DITCH as shown on the redline plan. 2. On the westerly drainage swale, there is an outfall to be constructed with Skyline Estates Filing 92. Please include a plan view of the outfall (use a shaded or screened linetype), indicating that it is to be constructed with Filing #2. Include a detail of the outfall (currently states it is to be found on Sheet 9) to clarify how it ties into this westerly swale to be constructed with Filing #3. 3. Identify Storm Sewer Line O on the plan view as redlined. Sheet 6: 1. For Note #6, please remove the word DITCH as shown on the redline plan. 2. Include the detail for the Channel Section D-D (for the 3-30" RCP's) found on Sheet 3 of the Grading and Erosion Control Plan on this sheet. 3. Clarify in Note 3 that the Sta/Off control for the flared end section of the 3-30" pipes is to the CENTER OF THE CENTER PIPE AT THE END OF THE FLARE, and adjust the arrow on the westerly side to point to the center of the center pipe. 4. Indicate the pipe spacing for the 3-30" RCP's on the plan view detail. 5. For Outlet Structure Detail, address notes below (on Sheet 7) for Outlet Structure Detail. Sheet 7: 1. On the Outlet Structure Detail: a. Show front view of 18" RCP outlet pipe control plate. Show method of attachment and shape. b. The inlet structures must be poured monolithically as one unit in the field to ensure they will remain attached. c. Please indicate missing dimensions such as base slab depth, reinforcing steel location, etc. d. We recommend providing a trash grate over the 4" diameter 5-yr orifice inlet. e. Provide a note indicating that locking grates shall be used on outlet structures. STREET CONSTRUCTION PLANS Please provide PE. seal and signature on all sheets. Sheet 1: 1. Modify the PLS #27601 shown on the last line of the Basis of Bearing Statement to be consistent with all other plan sets and the Final Plat. The PLS number shown for this on the Plat is 19003. 2. Delete Note 14, and add the words "MONUMENT HARDWARE SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE UPON REQUEST." Sheet 2: 1. Handicap ramps at the Nelson & Ridge Road intersection may need to be modified to match the Ridge Road Construction Plan. 2. Identify the 5' detached sidewalk to be constructed along 54's Avenue. 3. Change all of the "PROPOSED 5' CONC. ATTACHED WALK (TYP)" to read "6.5' CURBWALK TYPE MS4 (TYP)", as indicated on redlines. 4. The sidewalk is currently drawn on the plan view with a 5' wide walk (7.5' curbwalk), and it needs to be shown as a 4' wide sidewalk (6.5' curbwalk). 5. The handicap ramps at the Ridge Road and Nelson Street intersection, may need to be modified to match the ramps to be shown on the Ridge Road Construction Plans. 6. Show the following omitted items along Ridge Road: a. 7.5' Landscape (Tree-Lawn) Area. b. 35' Drainage Easement. c. 5' Detached Sidewalk & Sidewalk Easement. Sheet 3: 1. Need to modify ALL details to reflect the proposed 6.5' curbwalk (the sidewalk currently scales to 5' or 7.5' curbwalk). 2. Change all of the "PROPOSED 5' CONC. ATTACHED WALK (TYP)" to read "6.5' CURBWALK TYPE MS4 (TYP)", as indicated on redlines. Sheet 4: 1. Identify the 6.5' curbwalk to be constructed as shown on the redlines. 2. Need to modify ALL details to reflect the proposed 6.5' curbwalk (the sidewalk currently scales to 5' or 7.5' curbwalk). Sheet 5: 1. The sidewalk is currently drawn on the plan view with a 5' wide walk (7.5' curbwalk), and it needs to be shown as a 4' wide sidewalk (6.5' curbwalk). Sheet 6: 1. For the mountable sidewalk detail, remove the different types (e.g., MS vs. MS4) and associated notes as indicated on the redline plans, since the only type of monolithic curbwalk to be constructed is MS4. Rename the detail as 6.5' CURBWALK TYPE MS4. 2. For the Mountable Curb Comer Ramp Detail, remove the notes and table associated with the different pay items. Those notes are used for City projects where multiple widths of sidewalk are to be tied into the ramps (again, only 1 type of curbwalk used here) and the pay items are to assist contractors with payment for the different areas (not applicable here). 3. The ramp detail will need to be modified to reflect what is to be constructed, e.g., 4' wide walk (MS4). 4. For the Crosspan at Comer Ramp Detail, indicate the concrete depth to be 10" from PCR to PCR throughout the fillet area. 5. For the residential street detail, the drawing doesn't scale correctly. GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 1. Note 14 needs to be modified to read: "SURVEY ROW MONUMENTS SHALL BE SET PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE FINAL LIFT OF ASPHALT PAVEMENT. MONUMENT HARDWARE SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE UPON REQUEST." 2. On Sheet 4, a concrete pan or channel shall be constructed at the east end of the proposed curb & gutter. The concrete channel shall be constructed as to direct flows into the main channel and in a downstream direction. The proposed rip-rap may not need to extend to the end of the curb and gutter or edge of pavement once the channel is in place. 3. On Sheet 5, include the cross-slopes for the Ridge Road Improvements Typical Section as used in the Ridge Road Construction Plan design. The proposed Landscape (tree-lawn) Area is 7.5' from the front of the sidewalk to the back of the curb. 4. On Sheets 6 & 7, modify the symbols to represent what is shown on the Plan sheets. 5. On Sheets 8, modify the symbol for vehicle tracking to represent what is shown on the Plan sheets. 6. On Sheet 9, identify where TSB-3 is, or remove from the detail. UNDERDRAIN PLAN (Skyline Estates Filing #3 only) 1. Manhole lids are to be ordered with UNDERDRAIN on them to differentiate between storm & sanitary sewer, and irrigation manholes. . Traffic Engineering A copy of the street construction plans and traffic impact study has been forwarded to the Engineering Division Manager, Mr. Steve Nguyen, P.E. (303.235.2862) for review and he has the following comments: 1. For Sheet 8 (Striping and Signage Plan): O a. On the west end of the asphalt pavement (where pavement abruptly ends) at 3+00, show that type 3 barricades that conform to MUTC Section 3F.01 shall be placed. b. On the east end of the sidewalk (where sidewalk abruptly ends) place 2 Object Markers (red diamonds) to mark the end of the sidewalk - MUTC Code: OM4-3. 2. Comments regarding the Traffic Impact Study will be forthcoming after a submittal of the revised Study (to include all previously submitted addendums) has been received. Transportation Planning A copy of the Street construction plans has been forwarded to the City's Transportation Planner, Mr. David Mentor (303-235-2866) for review and has the following comments: Previous Comments: 1. Ridge Road is an identified streetscape corridor street and is subject to City Council's adopted Streetscape and Architectural Design Manual requirements. A copy of the Manual is available through the Planning Department for $10.00. 2. Please include information along Ridge Road that reflects the cross-section detail provided previously by the City Traffic Engineer. Various details related to the construction of curb, gutter, and detached sidewalk along Ridge Road are included in that cross section. (A copy of the cross section is attached). 3. The Developer will need to sign a "Streetscape Maintenance Agreement" prior to Certificate of Occupancy. 4. In the treelawn, the developer shall install: • Irrigation system. • Turf (or other approved ground cover - see Streetscape Manual). Street trees @35' - 40' spacing; 3" caliper (see Streetscape Manual for approved varieties). The Public Works Department requires 2 signed and sealed copies of the Traffic Impact Study, Storm Sewer Plans, Street Construction Plans, and Ridge Road Construction Plan. Please provide these with the next submittal. Subdivision Improvement Agreement Upon City Council approval of the Final Plat, a Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) will need be executed by the project owner/developer. The City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Department will provide the SIA to the project owner/developer. Please note that there may be additions to this document for this development. Application for Minor Dumping/Landfill Permit Prior to the commencement of any onsite grading, an Application for Dumping/Landfill Permit, along with the fees due will need to be submitted for review and approval. This Permit is generally issued at the time of the Building Permit. Public Improvements Cost Estimate & Guarantee Prior to any construction commencing for the required public improvements within the right-of-way, an itemized engineer's cost estimate will need to be submitted for review and approval. Upon acceptance of this estimate, a letter of credit reflecting total costs of the approved cost estimate plus 25% will need to be submitted by the owner/developer for review and approval. Right-of-Way Construction Permit(s)/Licensing Prior to any construction of the public improvements, the necessary Right-of-Way construction permit(s) and respective licensing will need to be submitted for processing by the City. Right-of-Way Construction Permits are issued only after approval of all required technical documents, including but not limited to, the Final Drainage Report & Plan, Final Plat, Final Development Plan, Traffic Impact Study, Storm Sewer Plans, Street Construction Plans, Grading & Erosion Control Plan, and easement or ROW dedications. 2-Year Warranty Period for Public Improvements Upon completion of all public improvements and acceptance by the City Inspector, the original Letter of Credit shall be surrendered. At this time a 2-year warranty period for the public improvements shall commence. If at any time during said 2-year Warranty Period the City Inspector deems that the constructed public improvements are in such condition as to require repairs or replacement, the Developer shall complete such work upon request. Upon commencement of the 2-year Warranty Period, a 2°a Letter of Credit in the amount of 25% of the original itemized engineer's cost estimate shall be submitted to the City of Wheat Ridge and be dated as to expire on the 2-year anniversary of the Warranty Period commencement date. The City shall retain said Letter of Credit for the entire 2-year Warranty Period. Upon completion of the 2-year Warranty Period, the 2"a Letter of Credit shall be surrendered by the City of Wheat Ridge. A signed acceptance letter from the ditch company will be required prior to the issuance of any building permits. Please return all redlined prints with the fourth submittal. If you have any questions, please contact me at 303-235-2864. Sincerely, David F. Brossman, P.L.S. Development Review Engineer Cc: Alan White, Director of Community Development Steven Nguyen, P.E., Engineering Manager Jonathan P. Reynolds, P.E., Projects Supervisor Dave Menter, Traffic Planner Mary Austin, Planner Darin Morgan, Code Administrator File skylme_review3 (Civill`la ).ltr 10 u of WH~TROm COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM c0(ORA~O TO: Planning Commission FROM: Mary Austin, Planner SUBJECT: Case # WZ-02-13 / Melody Homes FDP Case # WS-02-01 / Melody Homes Final Plat DATE: 8/14/2003 CC: Case File A request is being made for continuance of the Final Development Plan (WZ-02-13) and Final Plat (WS-02-01) to the next Planning Commission meeting. The applicant is continuing to make an effort to resolve some remaining final design issues prior to public hearing. Staff is recommending that Case # WZ-02-13 and Case # WS-02-01 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting on September 4, 2003. Recommended Motion: "I move that Case No. WZ-02-13, a request for approval of a final development plan, and Case No. WS-02-01, a request for approval of a 38-lot major subdivision plat, for property located at 10285 Ridge Road, be CONTINUED to September 4, 2003." CONSOLIDATED JUCHEM DITCH AND RESERVOIR COMPANY August 14, 2003 Planning and Development City of Wheat Ridge 7500 W. 29 h Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215 Attn: Mary Austin - Planner Re: Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 Dear Ms. Austin, The Board of Directors of the Consolidated Juchem Ditch and Reservoir Company is in agreement with Melody Homes, the developer of Skyline Estates Filing No. 3, to change alignment of the Juchem Ditch through the development property and to enclose the ditch in pipe. Mr. John Solheim, our attorney, will prepare an easement vacation and substitution agreement for execution by Melody Homes and our organization. When engineering is completed and submitted to Juchem Ditch for approval, we will require a sign-off line on the engineering drawings and the recorded plat to establish these changes to our ditch system. Sincerely, Robert Dexter President Juchem Ditch CC: Melody Homes, Darrell Pennington Consolidated Juchem Ditch & Reservoir Co. Established May 14,1861 Robert Dexter, President 303-424-4563 6345 Ouay St. Arvada, CO 80003 w EATP ITEM NO: m REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 11, 2003 TITLE: AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE FROM AGRICULTURAL-ONE TO PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 10285 RIDGE ROAD, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. (CASE NO. WZ-02-13) 7 PUBLIC HEARING ® ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING F] BIDS/iMOTIONS ❑ ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING ❑ RESOLUTIONS Quasi-Judicial: E F-1 Yes No Al 9C_._-' Community Development Director EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: City Manager Melody Homes, Inc. is requesting approval of a rezoning from Agricultural-One to Planned Residential Development and Planned Industrial Development and approval of an outline development plan for property located at 10285 Ridge Road. The outline development plan establishes the zoning, permitted uses, development standards and general design parameters. The purpose of the request is to establish the zoning to allow the property to be developed with 37 single family residential lots and one industrial lot. The site is currently vacant. Planning Commission recommended approval at their meeting on July 17, 2003, with conditions. COMMISSION/BOARD RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission reviewed this case at a public hearing held on July 17, 2003. A recommendation of approval was made with the following conditions: 1. The residential zoning shall be subject to the City's parkland fee in lieu of land dedication at the time of final plat. 2. Building height in the PID shall be limited to 35 feet. 3. Use numbers 10, 18, 19, 37, 38 and 48 shall be removed as permitted uses from the PH). 4. The height of accessory structures be limited to 12 feet. 5. All references to "blue grass sod" in the application be changed to "sod". No one from the audience spoke in regards to the application. STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES: The conditions recommended by Planning Commission as stated above have been agreed to by Melody Homes. The condition regarding the requirement of a parkland fee in lieu of land dedication should be perpetuated as a condition of approval. Modifications have been made to the outline development plan addressing conditions 2-5. Condition #2 recommends eliminating specific uses from the list of permitted uses for the industrial zoning. The eliminated uses are as follows: 10. Building contractor's service shop and storage yard incidental to an office/showroom principal use. This shall include carpenters, painters, roofers, electricians, plumbers, heating and air conditioning contractors and similar uses as approved by the Director of Community Development. 18. Electrical supplies and service. 19. Equipment rental agencies. 37. Lumber yards and building supply stores. 38. Manufacturing, processing, assembly or light industrial operations. 48. Research laboratories, offices and facilities for research. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: Do not approve the rezoning request. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The City has received a one-time application fee for the rezoning and outline plan. The zoning for the industrial lot has a permitted list of mainly commercial uses. Depending on the actual use developed, sales tax revenue could be generated. The City will receive a fee in lieu of parkland dedication and a one-time fee for a building permit application for each single family home constructed. , RECOMMENDED MOTIONS: "I move to approve Council Bill No. , Case Number WZ-02-13, a request for a rezoning from Agricultural-One to Planned Residential Development and Planned Industrial Development and approval of an outline development plan for property located at 10285 Ridge Road, on first reading, ordered published, public hearing set for September 8, 2003 at 7:00 pm in the City Council Chambers, and that it take effect 15 days after final publication." or, "I move to table indefinitely Council Bill No. , Case Number WZ-02-13, a request for a rezoning from Agricultural-One to Planned Residential Development and Planned Industrial Development and approval of an outline development plan for property located at 10285 Ridge Road, on first reading, with the following findings: 1." Initiated by: Community Development Department Report Prepared by: Mary Austin (303) 235-2852 Reviewed by: Meredith Reckert (303) 235-2848 Attachments: 1. Planning Commission report with exhibits 2. Council Bill No. CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission DATE OF MEETING: July 17, 2003 DATE PREPARED: July 10, 2003 CASE NO. & NAME: WZ-02-13 / Melody Homes CASE MANAGER: Mary Austin ACTION REQUESTED: Rezone from A-1, Agricultural-One to PRD, Planned Residential Development and PID, Planned Industrial Development. Approval of an Outline Development Plan. LOCATION OF REQUEST: NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT(S): 10285 Ridge Road Melody Homes 11031 Sheridan Blvd. Westminster. CO 80020 NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER(S): State of Colorado APPROXIMATE AREA: 17.67 Acres (769,655.51 square feet) PRESENT ZONING: PRESENT LAND USE: SURROUNDING ZONING: SURROUNDING LAND USE: A-1, Agricultural Vacant land E: A-1 S: PID, Industrial N:, & W: City of Arvada residential N: Residential E_: Public S: Industrial W: Vacant: Approved for Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AER, Agricultural Estate Residential (1 unit/acre) DATE PUBLISHED: July 3, 2003 DATE POSTED: July 1, 2003 DATED LEGAL NOTICES SENT: July 3, 2003 ENTER INTO RECORD: (X) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) ZONING ORDINANCE (X) EXHIBITS ( ) SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS ( ) OTHER JURISDICTION: The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. ATTACHMENT 1 I. REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a zone change from A-1, Agricultural to PRD, Planned Residential Development and PID, Planned Industrial Development and approval of an Outline Development Plan for property located at 10285 Ridge Road. (Exhibit 1, Zoning Map) The purpose of the request is to allow for the development of the property into 37 single family residential lots and 1 industrial lot. The Outline Development Plan approval process will establish the zoning, permitted uses, development standards and general design parameters. Publication and noticing has taken place for the Final Development Plan and Final Plat to be heard at this same public hearing. However, due to a delay in approval of the final drainage report and Ridge Road design it is being requested that they be continued to the next Planning Commission meeting on August 7, 2003. H. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING The required neighborhood meeting was held on June 19, 2002. A copy of the meeting summary and the sign-in sheets (Exhibit 2) are included with this report. III. OUTLINE PLAN As part of the rezoning process the applicant has submitted the required Outline Development Plan (ODP). (Exhibit 3, Outline Development Plan) The property being rezoned is approximately 17.67 acres in size (769,655.51 sq. ft.). The property has frontage on Ridge Road (southern boundary) and W 54' Avenue (northern boundary). The property is currently zoned A-1, Agricultural. The site is, at the present, vacant land. It was formerly utilized as a tree farm. Of the total site area, 14.49 acres (82%) are to be zoned PRD, residential and 3.18 acres (18%) are to be zoned PID, industrial. Sheet 3 of the ODP shows the extent and location of the areas proposed for PRD and PID zoning. The PID zoning is delineated with a bold line and is located at the southwest corner of the property along Ridge Road. Sheet 2 of the ODP establishes the list of permitted uses and development standards for the PRD and PID zones. As required, the ODP site plan shows the conceptual layout of streets, drainage areas and open space tracts. The proposed lot lines and easements are also shown for a total of 38 lots to be created with a final plat document. Of these lots, 37 will be for residential use and 1 for industrial use. The layout of the residential and industrial areas is compatible with the residential and indimtTial lnratinng in the adjacent Skyline Estates Filing 2 to the west. Filing 2 in the City of Planning Commission Page 2 WZ-02-13/Melody Homes Arvada creates an industrial area adjacent to Ridge Road with residential lots to the north. The development of the total site is planned to occur in two phases. The first phase will encompass the residential lots with associated improvements, streets, utilities, drainage improvements and all public improvements. The Final Development Plan and Final Plat have been submitted and are currently under final review prior to public hearing. The second phase will consist of the development of the industrial lot for which a final development plan will be submitted at a later date. Residential Component There will be a total of 37 residential lots. The permitted uses in the PRD zoning area are limited to single family residences and typical accessory structures such as sheds and detached garages. The permitted uses do not allow for any type of multi-family dwellings. Most of the development standards for the residential zoning refer to the appropriate section of the City's Zoning Code. The minimum lot size is being established at 7,900 square feet which is slightly larger than the City's R-1B residential zoning district. The average lot size is approximately 0.25 acres in size. The minimum front setback of 20 feet is consistent with Skyline Estates Filings 1 and 2 in the City of Arvada. It does vary slightly from the standard of 30 feet required by the City's conventional residential zoning districts. However, additional design standards are being incorporated into the front setback requirement. A staggering of the front setback line is provided for in note #4 of the residential development standards. The front setback of homes shall vary between 20 to 25 feet with a minimum variation of 2.5 feet. This shall provide visual relief along the street frontage instead of having the homes built on the same setback line. Additional neighborhood aesthetics will be accomplished by requiring that no two homes with the same elevation and floor plan will be constructed on adjacent lots or lots across the street. Furthermore, there will not be two garage dominant models adjacent to each other. Other design standards aimed at increasing aesthetic appeal have been included in notes 2, 3 and 7 of the residential standards. An extensive amount of brick or stone will be included on each home fagade. The first floor of each front elevation will be required to have a minimum of 50% brick or stone with a 4-foot return along each side. In order to break up the side plane of homes located on a corner lot or adjacent to an open space tract, those homes shall have a minimum of 2 windows on that side, trim board enhancements, and variation in siding material. Open space is being provided in the amount of 4.79 acres. This amounts to 27% of the total site. Some of the open space will also function as drainage features. Open space and drainage areas will be set up in tracts on the final plat document. Planning Commission Page 3 WZ-02-13/Melody Homes Industrial Component The PID zoning is proposed for a single industrial lot and a drainage tract. The list of allowed uses on the Outline Development Plan closely minors the City's C-1, Commercial-One district. Some of the potentially incompatible uses (such as auto repair and service, auto, recreational vehicle and trailer sales, flea markets and mini-warehouses) have been eliminated from the list. Some compatible uses permitted in the City's industrial district (such as greenhouses, nurseries and office/warehouse) have been included. The industrial development standards are consistent with the City's current code requirements. For most standards, a reference to the specific code section is made. The minimum landscaped area is established at 20% of the total site. In order to help protect the traffic pattern on Ridge Road and the residential neighborhood, access to the industrial parcel shall be from Oak Street only. The industrial standards require buffering and screening for parking areas. Any outdoor storage will have to be explicitly identified on an approved final development plan and function only as an accessory to a permitted use with screening requirements being met. The architectural design will be specifically detailed on the final development plan at the future time it is submitted for approval. Architectural standards established on this Outline Development Plan require exterior materials of brick, stone, wood and glass. Fenestration and articulation of the fagade is also required. Metal buildings are expressly prohibited. IV. REZONING CRITERIA Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a zone change request. That the existing zone classification currently recorded on the official zoning maps of the City of Wheat Ridge is an error. The property is currently zoned A-1, Agricultural. There is no mistake on the zoning map. 2. That a change in the character in the area has occurred due to installation of public facilities, other zone changes, new growth trends, deterioration or development transitions. A change in character of the area has occurred on the adjacent properties to the north and west. The property to the north in the City of Arvada has been rezoned to residential and has been recently developed with single family homes. The property to the west in the City of Planning Commission Page 4 WZ-02-13/Melody Homes Arvada has been approved for industrial zoning along Ridge Road, with the remainder of the property as residential. 3. That the change of zone is in conformance, or will bring the property into conformance, with the City of Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan goals, objectives and policies, and other related policies or plans for the area. The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map designates the property as AER Agricultural Estate Residential 1 unit/acre. The proposed zoning of industrial and single family residential is not in direct conformance with this designation. To be economically viable a greater residential density is being proposed. Based on the total site area a gross density of 2.09 dwellings per acre is proposed. Considering the residential area to be platted into 37 lots, the net density is proposed at the rate of 2.55 dwellings per acre. While this density exceeds the recommendation of the Comprehensive Plan it is not disproportionate to the surrounding residential density. The Comprehensive Plan does designate the area on the south side of Ridge Road, across the street from this property, as BP, Planned Business/Industrial Parks. The proposed industrial zone on the north side of Ridge Road is compatible with this designation. Considering the surrounding land uses, staff concludes that it is unlikely that the site will be developed with a low density residential use. The boundaries established on the future land use map are meant to be somewhat flexible. While the proposal is not in strict conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, the adjacent land uses of industrial and single family residential should be considered. 4. That the proposed change of zone is compatible with the surrounding area and there will be minimal adverse impacts considering the benefits to be derived. The change of zone will be compatible with the surrounding area. The industrial zoning along Ridge Road is compatible with the industrial zoning across Ridge Road to the south. The residential zoning will be consistent with the single family residential zoning to the north and west in the City of Arvada. 5. That there will be social, recreational, physical and/or economic benefits to the community derived by the change of zone. There could potentially be economic benefits associated with the area identified for industrial zoning in the form of additional revenue to the City. There are physical benefits associated with the construction of public improvements along Ridge Road. These improvements will include a detached sidewalk and tree lawn as identified in the City's Streetscape and Architectural Design Manual. Planning Commission Page 5 WZ-02-13/Melody Homes Other than the one-time fees and taxes, the economic benefit to the City will be minimal. Property tax revenue is low considering the services the City will be required to provide to the new residences. Additionally, residents may shop in Wheat Ridge but a good portion of retail shopping will likely occur in Arvada due to the close proximity of Arvada businesses. 6. That adequate infrastructure/facilities are available to serve the type of uses allowed by the change of zone, or that the applicant will upgrade and provide such where they do not exist or are under capacity. All utility providers will serve the property with improvements constructed at the developer's expense. Tracts will be provided for on-site drainage features according to the final drainage plan. 7. That the change of zone will not adversely affect public health, safety or welfare by creating excessive traffic congestion, creating drainage problems, or seriously reducing light and air to adjacent properties. The traffic impact study has been reviewed and approved to assure that the increase in traffic from the residential and industrial development is accounted for. Setbacks are established with the development standards to protect the amount of light and air available to adjacent properties. 8. That the change of zone will not create an isolated or spot zone district unrelated to adjacent or nearby areas. Both the PRD and PID zoning as proposed will be compatible with surrounding property. The rezoning will not create an isolated zone district of either residential or industrial. The industrial area will be adjacent to industrial zoning to the south and west. The residential zoning will be adjacent to similar single family residential zoning to the north and west. V. AGENCY REFERRALS All outside service agencies will serve the property when developed. Arvada Fire District will serve the property. A traffic impact study has been reviewed and approved by the City's Traffic Engineer. All public improvements required for the safe movement of vehicles will be constructed by the developer. A final drainage report and plan is in the process of being reviewed in conjunction with the final plat and final development plan. Public improvements along Ridge Road will be required as part of the final plat and final development plan. Planning Commission Page 6 WZ-02-13/Melody Homes The Parks and Recreation Department has requested fee in lieu for parkland dedication. VI. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION Staff concludes that although inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of agricultural estate residential, there has been such a change of character in the surrounding area as to warrant the proposed zone change. Therefore, staff recommends Approval of Case No. WZ-02-13 with a condition that the parkland fee in lieu of land dedication be required at time of final plat. VII. RECOMMENDED MOTIONS Option A: "I move that Case No. WZ-02-13, a request for approval of a zone change from A-1, Agricultural to PRD, Planned Residential Development and PID, Planned Industrial Development and approval of an outline development plan for property located at 10285 Ridge Road, be APPROVED for the following reasons: 1. The requirements of the City's Planned Development Regulations have been met. 2. The rezoning will not adversely impact the public health, safety or welfare. 3. The zone change is compatible with the surrounding area and the adjacent zoning of residential to the north and west as well as the adjacent zoning of industrial to the south and west. 4. A change in character of the area has occurred due to the zone changes on adjoining property to the north and west. 5. There are physical benefits to be derived from the construction of public improvements and a tree lawn along Ridge Road. 6. Adequate infrastructure will be constructed with the development to serve the proposed use. With the following condition: 1. The residential zoning shall be subject to the City's parkland fee in lieu of land dedication at the time of final plat. Option B: "I move that Case No. WZ-02-13, a request for approval of a zone change from A-1, Agricultural to PRD, Planned Residential Development and PID, Planned Industrial Development and approval of an outline development plan for property located at 10285 Ridge Road, be DENIED for the following reasons: 1. 2. Planning Commission Page 7 WZ-02-13/Melody Homes - -I I I ~ I I I I , I SITE ARVADA I z OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WHEAT RIDGE COLORADO 5E 16 - PARCEL/LOT BOUNDARY (DESIGNATES OWNERSHIP) WATER FEATURE • DENOTES MULTIPLE ADDRESSES (i 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN u (APPROXIMATE LOCATION) NE 16 V® 1 DEPARTMENT OF - MAP ADOPTED: June 15, 1994 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Last Revision: September 10, 2001 EXHIBIT 1 7500 West 29'" Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215 City of Wheat Ridge Telephone (303) 235-2846 Fax (303) 235-2857 Neighborhood Meeting Summary Date: June 19, 2002 City Staff Present: Mary Austin, Planner Michael Garcia, Development Review Engineer a Location of Meeting: Wheat Ridge Municipal Building, 2nd floor conference room Property Address: Property Owner: Applicant: Existing Zoning: 10285 Ridge Road Sate of Colorado Melody Homes A-1 Property Owner Present? No Applicant Present? Yes Comp Plan Designation: AER (1 unit/acre) Existing use/site conditions: Vacant land Applicants proposal: To rezone the property from A-1 to PRD and PID and receive approval of an Outline Development Plan, Final Development Plan and Final Plat. The applicant intends to develop the site with 37 single family residential homes and an industrial area along Ridge Road. Issues discussed: Questions were posed regarding plans for the industrial area. Melody Homes commented that the industrial area is planned to be compatible with the industrial area in the City of Arvada along Ridge Road. It is not planned to be an intensive manufacturing area. The industrial area will p\most likely not be a part of the homeowners association. Maintenance of Ridge Road: The road is entirely within the City of Wheat Ridge and will be maintained by Wheat Ridge. Questions were raised about the keeping of large animals on the residential lots. Melody Homes responded that the covenants will likely prohibit large animals and they will not be listed as a permitted use. Traffic circulation: A traffic impact study will be required to be submitted by Melody Homes and approved by the City. EXHIBIT 2 tD 00 v cn O D 4 a w a V W W O W n SYJ ~ Gv ~ u r J l r A 0 1 S z 0 V V J_ O O ~ V 1 o N N ~ -L r w Al Iz CD D G. a CCD N .D O cD 1"- Z a m Cl) N z z Q c G) ~ z i M > Z C/) ~ Q. Q m M o u M 0 m ~ m F m z Y I CO 00 V cn A W N (z a$J ill CD I l ~ \I D ~ a N N L\) W o 1 ~ y r Z m cn m cn m O = lu z u' c z z m 00 0 m z D ? d O 2 m O M N oo v m m ~ m o z Z O V' r M r • - - - - - - wry ~ ~ - - - - - - SECTION i j. ~ I C L 5 'T er g s c .o-.~. t i 1~ ~'S x 1+~...P~ ~ _ fir/ A: y ran ~f.. -,1 ii ~ Y. 1 c ~ l; ~4 }.r` t - _ ry < 0 k', ~ R l v ~ , ~ ~s`n Z'~ F y . ~ :.w~" ues, c, t r +F' ~ r,, Vim yy ~;,`ayu ~ J',~ i t. a d+ _ ~ _ x 14 ~ c W~ . L ~ .K1?' { ~y~1 ,~y~ ~~~y Y; r,` f 2 ~~.:a+ A g ~ ~ r' _ , . r _ .w. C r $ 4~ r4 wk ~ Y o. - . _ rya . ~ ~ ~ ,r. d w ~ ; y .y~y;. ~i~ _.x. t k ~ ro } 1~ yy~~ _ ~ r, 3 .L. Tu+ ~ , t 1~ ~ ~ 74 ~.V"~ 1 R , `!f f 'fem. i x1 k, i ~ ~ i i OWNERS CERTIFICATE: ~ ;fit ,y,... ~ ~ ti ~ , ~a THE STATE OF COLORADO, STATE BOARD OF LAND COMMISSIONERS, BEING THE OWNER ~ ti. ~ OF REAL PROPERTY CONTAINING 17.fi7 ACRES DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ~ n . ~m e ' s ~ * L'. ALL THAT PART OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF awe--' tf. y. ~ ,ra. ~ SECTION 16. TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, :r„'~"~` 'F. ~ 'fir „ i,~,"y~t?- ,,~yi3 v.%;, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO, LYING NORTH OF a ~ ~ ,1`.;~, , . 1 ~ ~ k ~ j.5 ~~yl noY ' , ttIC . , THE COUNTY ROAD KNOWN AS RIDGE ROAD. MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS . ~ ~ ~ - - w, _ x-~ _ _ ~f _ ~ ~r - FOLLOWS: Y", M l . S].. ~ e COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 1~, _ b~ . ~~s t , - THENCE NORTH 00'13' 11" WEST, ON AND ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID h. s ~h' _ i3kBMY;z9f~sE;°s~as,P~`'~~.. ~ ~ - NORTHEAST 1 /4, A DISTANCE OF 71.25 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY ~ ,::Y 15Ray}i ~ .:A... ,r ~ ~ . 1t RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF RIDGE ROAD. SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE TRUE POINT OF F BEGINNING; , , .~..w.- •.i. e. ~v~ e~. r.u-sf ~~N •ia-~~ w.~e~ ~~r ~~~e-e►r ~ ~~~r ~r etii~e~ e w _ ~ wa _ ~ tittV(:t IVUK I h UU 1 J I 1 YYtJ 1 VIV AIVU ALVIV(~ 1 htt YYtJ I LIIVt Ut JAIU NORTHEAST 1 /4, A DISTANCE OF 1246.20 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CQRNER 0~ SAID SOUTHWEST 1 /4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1 /4; VICINITY MAP ~Y THE 1~'HEAT RIDGE ~T1C THENCE NORTH 89'35' 34" EAST, ON AND ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SCALE: 1 1200' SOUTHWEST 1 /4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1 /4, A DISTANCE OF 665.06 FEET TO THE r t NORTHEAST CORNER QF SAID WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1 /4; N TES; ' (continued) 1fHENCE SOUTH 00'12' S9" EAST, ON AND ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST 1/2 U~ 1. NOTICE ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW, YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, A DISTf~NCE OF 1068.47 FEET TO ~ BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE (3) YEARS AFTER YOU 10. TRACT DESIGNATIOW `TABLE: POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID RIDGE ROAD; FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY TRACT AREA s THENCE SOUTH 74'38'30" WEST, ON AND ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN (10) YEARS FROM THE OF 688.90 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT O~ BEGINNING. DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. A 113,689 sq. ft./2.72 2. LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY COMMITMENT N0. ABJ845200-5 WAS ENTIRELY , s..... . 2 CONTAINING 769.656 SQUARE FEET (17.67 ACRES) MORE OR LESS. RELIED UPON FOR RECORD DATA REGARDING RIGHTS-OF-WAY, EASEMENTS AND B 3040 sq. ft./0.07 a ENCUMBRANCES IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS PLAT. C 9299 s . ft. 0.21 a 3. BASIS OF BEARING: BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST D 2400 sq. ft./0.06 a QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, r f x~ i HAVE LAID OUT, SUBDIVIDED AND PLATTED SAID LAND AS PER THE DRAWING HEREON 3 CONTAINED UNDER THE NAME AND SME OF SKYLINE ESTATES FILING No. 3. A SUBDIVISION OF A PART OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE. COLORADO AND BY THESE RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AS BEARING E 8550 sq. ft./4.20 a NORTH 00'1311" WEST. THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST Y4 OF SAID F 9fi97 sq. ft./0.22 a SECTION 16 IS MONUMENTED BY A 3-Y4" BRASS CAP STAMPED "CITY OF WHEAT G 23,969 sq. ft./0.55 RIDGE LS 13212" AND THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE PRESENTS DO DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE AND THE PUBLIC THOSE PORTIONS OF REAL PROPERTY SHOWN AS RIGHT-OF--WAY, AND DO FURTHER DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE AND THOSE MUNICIPALLY OWNED AND/OR MUNICIPALLY FRANCHISED UTILITIES AND SERVICES THOSE PORTIONS OF REAL PROPERTY SHOWN AS NORTHEAST Y+ OF SAID SECTION 1fi IS MONUMENTED BY A 2" ALUMINUM CAP H 34,003 sq. ft./0.78 STAMPED; "PLS 19003". * -SKYLINE ESTATES, OR OT 4. THIS PROPERTY LIES 1MTHIN ZONE C. DESIGNATED AS AREAS OF MINIMAL THE DEVELOPER AND MA FLOODING, ACCORDING TO FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOOD EASr~MENTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION INSTALLATION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT FOR ALL SERVICES. THIS INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO 4 TELEPHONE AND ELECTRIC LINES, GAS LINES, WATER AND SANITARY SEWER LINES. HYDRANTS. STORM WATER SYSTEMS AND PIPES, DETENTION PONDS, STREET LIGHTS AND INSURANCE RATE MAP. COMMUNITY PANEL N0. 085079-0005 C. REVISED 11. AREA DATA TABLE: t i ALL APPURTENANCES THERETO. FEBRUARY 4, 1998. 5 6 OWNER -STATE OF COLORADO 5. ALL RIGHT-OF-WAY RETURN RADtI ARE FIFTEEN (15') FEET, UNLESS OTHERWISE TOTAL AREA TO BE NOTED. SUBDIVIDED 769,65 6. TEN FOOT (10') WIDE EASEMENTS ARE HEREBY GF~ANTED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY LARGEST SIZE LOT ADJACENT TO ALL PUBLIC STREETS AND FRONT PROPERTY LINES OF EACH LOT IN (BLOCK 4, LOT 1) 87~~31 Z THE SUBDIVISION OR PLATTED AREA. TEN F00T (10') WIDE EASEMENTS ARE HEREBY LARGEST SIZE LQT GRANTED ADJACENT TO A~~ REAR PROPERTY LINES. FIVE FOOT (5') WIDE EASEMENTS (RESIDENTIAL ONLY 14.396 ARE HEREBY GRANTED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ADJACENT TO ALL SIDE LET LINES BLOCK 1, LOT 4) r OF EACH LOT IN THE SUBDIVISION OR PLATTED AREA. THESE EASEMENTS ARE DEDICATED FOR THE INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE. AND REPLACEMENT OF ELECTRIC, SMALLEST SIZE LOT ~~919 GAS, TELEVISION CABLE, DRAINAGE AND COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES. UTILITIES (BLOCK 2. LOT 1 } STATE OF COLORADO ) ~ ) SS SHALL ALSO BE PERMITTED WITHIN ANY ACCESS EASEMENTS AND PRIVATE STREETS AVERAGE SIZE LOT 9.564 IN THE SUBDIVISION. PEF2MANENT STRUCTURES AND WATER METERS SHALL NOT BE AWERAGE SIZE LOT `Y+ 1 COUNTY OF JEFFERSON U PERMITTED WITHIN SAID UTILITY EASEMENTS. RESIDENTIAL ONLY 8'975 L.. THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS DAY ~ ~ OF A.D. 20 8Y 7. THE 5 FOOT WIDE SIDEWALK EASEMENT ALONG RIDGE ROAD IS FOR THE PURPOSE 'r i CONSTRUC110N AND MAINTENANCE OF SAID SIDEWALK. 12. A RECORDED STREETSCAPE M 8. THE STORM DETENTION AREAS HERE SHOWN AS TRACTS A AND H SHALL BE gY THE OWNER/DEVELOPER CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED BY THE OWNER AND SUBSEQUENT OWNERS, HEIRS, FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF T SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. IN THE EVENT THAT SUCH CONS~'RUC110N AND 30~ OF THE RIDGE ROAD RIG MAINTENANCE IS NOT PERFORMED BY SAID OWNER, THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE SHALL t O O X S w w N ~~ESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. r j k w w z x t- L 1 o MY COMMISSION EXPIRES ~ t~ > HAVE THE RIGHT TO ENTER SUCH AREA AND PERFORM NECESSARY WORK. THE COST SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE 0 0 U U OF WHICH SAID OWNER, HEIRS, SUCCESSORS, AND ASSIGNS AGREES TO PAY. NO SKYLINE ESTATES FlLING N0. ~ ~ O BUILDING OR STRUCTURE WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE DETENTION AREA AND NO AND ASSIGNS. NOTARY PUBLIC a CHANGES OR ALTERATIONS AFFECTING THE HYDRAULIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE 13. THE 35 FOOT WIDE DRAINAGE J J aj DETENTION AREA WILL BE MADE WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE DIRECTOR OF RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF RID PUBLIC WORKS. TRACT IN WHICH THEY ARE 9. BLOCKS 1, 2 AND 3 ARE ZONED PRD (RESIDENTIAL). BLOCK 4 lS ZONED PID Z Z ~ U 9 Qm Jm (INDUSTRIAL). 1~ } ~ r o~ om J L" / Q ND (N U-) V- M N M as D.. a NN NI- CDD(is 1 f CA M C) cn ~C QQ N. r%. l`. N® (N C:) AP MICHAEL ~MELO 11031 Sher APPLICANT SAT MT 8/7/03 V- V- M OD Q.M cp ®p 0C3C7 PREPARATION 7,.** N N C G3 C7 ELODY HOMES Sheridan Boulevard SCALE: CONSULTING ENGINEERS Westm in st 4® 003 a- w z w ssm muix arc s~cr. sm[ MEMO cmom Will OttXd® nne (mi) 6%-zim roc (0) see-2aaz 6 ..i_5 cr 0 CL 0-,r- 0 2: 1 t ■ 1 A ~ SECTION l,IR1~E TAL 50 0 50 100 j i SKYLINE ESTATES FI FINAL PLAT ORIGINAL SCALE: 1 "=50' 20' ORA/NAGS AN /RR/GA AON EASEMEN ~ Q A PART OF THE WEST Y2 OF THE SOUTHWEST ~R_ 'ir_ ~Y >N 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERS MATCH UNE -SEE SHEET 3 I r i ~ ~ 'Q ~ w t ABU DING ~ ~ Q 10 UTILITY EASEMENT ~ ~ (SEE NOTE 6) LOT 0. ~ ~ N 0 ~ REAR--I N " + ao I--- ~ ~ C~ 227.68' ,yh ~ -S89'35'34"VV- ~ ,~t tis O J 1 J~1~ I i V ~t / ~t / lJ YV V . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C21 A G G ~ ~ a. C33 71.76 50.Q0 s 82'1 ~~i2~*~~~~ • ~ w w z - -120.15'- - ~ ~ ~ ~ Q C34 23.61 15.00 9Q'11'15" 45"1 x'48" 21.2 zc° I ~ ~ I X6,5 '5 C5 W. 53rd Ave. N89'35'34"E N I C35 23.56 15.Q0 ,CSC} 9C~'QU'~D" 44''4"E 1.21 w W in in W N ~ o»E C4 - - 295.02' ~ 15.02' MI M~ 12 o z C36 66.68 275.00 i.C~ 13'3' ~JtJ7' 1'12=UV' v 1 I I ~ ( wo N~43a3, 255.94' C3 n ~ 8,462 SQ., FT. ~o ci n (~0 1~' C37 21.52 275.00 5 U.E. O ~ Q ~ -~,p (a C38 20.01 275.(7Q Q w ~ vwi I I ~ I ~ ~ ~3~31 C2~ _ 140.02' - - - - - 115.92 - - n W ~ 9.62' ~ _p p0 ~ 8.16' ~ ~ N ~O C39 53.78 275. QO OwF-~ ~ ~a 5g' ~ 10' U.E. - N89'35'34"E - ~ Q ~ } C40 113.76 225.00 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ FRON T ~TM~~ 120.43' ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ C41 4.39 325.00 ~ ~ S45'20'01 "E o ~ o o ( C42 6.62 50.f~0 ~ 10' UTILITY EASEMENT ~ 44.41' ' 25' 25 J ~ ~ az ? r~ M C4 5 . F3 75.00 (SEE NOTE 6) 4 9 ~ ~ ~ N 46'49"E ~4o.~s' LOT 1 W co ~ ~ 87,731 SQ. FT. TRACT H o LOT EASEMENT DETAIL W Z~ _ SCALE: 1"=50~ N~ t,j ~ Z z ~ z ( 2,01 ACRES o 0.78 ACRES oa'o N rn ti~ -~~-4 Q I ZONED PID (INDUSTRIAL) ° o cn',,_ aDI Nam I ~ o N I ~ I~ ~ I ~,j ~ O I CITY OF ~ ~ rn z ~ I WHEAT RIDGE m JO ~ wv BQUNDARY LINE 10' U.E. I- ~ Q D I N (T~) ~ ~ ~ m O~ p ~ N ~ a O t N m' ~ ~ ~ I . N I N I v' 10' U.E. o° ~ DRAINAGE ~ N~,~383~ C31 q.3,25 EASEMENT i r--~ ~,g2 5 p,GE ~ ~I 10' U.E. I ~ ~ ~PSEMENT~3-23' ~~~f ~ oe~ ~I N J-~'' 243 pE r. `4 ~ ~ ~ 3o s~ - ~ 6g8.9~ /CppqD y~ i ~ ~ ~ of L ~ ~ oo' - R T- 43 g 30~ ~ R~GM ~3g~ i x t ~ ~ N ~ 1 1 86' s~ ~50.8~ w -30~ -93 ~ (6~Oe~ No, F1 / ~ N55'23'37"W 5 si~Ew~uc f~~,.,.- ~ ~ F~ C~MFN T _ - ~ ~ 14.59' at i / ~ z J o ~ ~ ~ v~ / • lt. POINT OF BEGINNING l J 0 0 ~ ~ 0.47' LS 12438 ~ i ~i. ~J I ~ o ~ o - i a a I METAL I P&C LS 9380 ~ ~ I,DG~ PIPE ~ z z ~ ~ R ~ 0.18' 0.44' / ~ gp ~ W ~ W a~ ~ DETAIL A ~m ~m NO SCALE / o~ o„ ~ r l-_ c7 ,•N f CN C ~LO IV=G.73, GG:7.y i kbtt Nu It Wit 0) M In m Q rt Q 7: E=27,202.Oa N N N Cy O :-Q~- t EL.=5435.07 (NGVD29) BLOCK NUM KIRRE" AP MICHAEL MELO[ NUMBER Q M (f) O M ~ C) C Q 1-100, LO N / . , N o N y r- N. U) r- , C) co Q) CV) OD 00 UNtJ0 APPLICANT [DATE OF /7,~0 CN Cs N QZ.QO / Q/ D PREPARATION: ELODY HOMES CL LM 11031 Sher Sheridan Boulevard SCALE. 1s*_ ~o C) a C.w,Lzw CONSULTING ENGINEERS Westm in s t F- w cj_ F- F- M 0 0 w same auM srt~r. sure 2000. orrooo, ooloW em» W-W Fex: (m) W-W i t X JJ L- C) CL CL v-- Q 1 SKYLINE ESTATES FI FINAL PLAT A A PART OF THE WEST/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST SECTION ~N 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOU TH, RANGE 69 WEST CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFI=ERS SK'lLlly_F ES f .r NW CORNER, SW 1 /4, NE 1 /4, i - - - - SECTION 16> T3S, R69W SET 2" ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED: "PLS 19003" - -(CITY OF WHEATRIDGE DATUM) N=24,543.35 E=27,197.02 . r~ z a J 50 0 50 100 Q w m ORfGfNAL SCALE: 1"=50' o w Q m y ~ ~ ~l z ~ i Q M r 3 G 109.62' o ° ~ ~ S19°2 ~ o~ q. ~ R~ o Sri 5` u.E. a; 26. Z 9,474 SQ. FT. ~ w 45.pp~ ~ N (T~'?). ~ M 4 q ! ~ ~ , ~ i No L,, ~ ~ Z i o o ( G 70.45' C 3 ~ I U ~ _ o ~ ~ o~ „~'S/ ' - - - - -'a Z 10,.540 SQ. FT. ~ t- t 10' UTILITY EASEMENT ABUTTING ~ ~ ~ ~ (SEE NOTE 6) LOT a, p cn ~ S89 46 49 W v ~ ~ - 22.94 - ~n (n Q ~ .~1g FJ L ~ ~,d- ~ ~ ~ N89°46 49 E ' 0 ~ 3~~ z o) ~ Q3v ` -119.57'- - ~ , n ~ ~ ~~19 9 O~,E~ t r ~ w --I REAR-I ~ z D 5 ~Q ~ 5' U.E. ` ~ ~ O: r ~ ~ cc°o~ 7,944 SQ. FT. `o"o ~ cal (TYP) ~o O ~ ~ t~. Q d' ~ ~ jC 14,396 SQ. FT. F ~ r. w w z w w ~N89'46'49"E -120.04' ~ 7,g1 g SQ. FT. I ~ \ v' , zcfllo o, ~'w z w in v> W ~ ~ 10' U.E. GAO Z ~ ~ - - ETYP) ~ ~ S8~°46 49 'W - ~ / .,~g ~ ~ ( ~ o ~ ~ ~ -120.00' ~ ~ / 0 ~ 10~ U.E. ( ~ ~ ~ 6'J. (TYP) Sra`L l~ Q° I I I I w w w ~a w ~I 7,920 SQ. FT. = ~o uE. ~ O ~ F= ~ ~ FRONT ~ ~ (Q D ~ - S89°46'49"W - ~ o I ca 7,920 SQ. FT. I ~ o ~~5~ {T~~ N N ~ - -120.00'- - `i ~ I- - N89°46'49"E - ~ z ~o' u.E. ~ ~ 10' UTILITY EASEMENT CO CO f (SEE NOTE 6} o~ 7 - -120.00'- - ~t (T~) ~ 6~•~029 N N o 7,920 SQ. FT. 25' z5' ~ ~o' u.E. I ~ ~ N ~ I i o' u.E. I ~ o~ (TYP) o TRACT G c'~ ~RPG~ (TYP) - - - ~ ( t°~ 3 `cfl 0.55 ACRES ~ ' 6'►~0' I LOT EASEMENT DETAIL SCALE: 1 "=50'}~'' c° 7,920 SQ. FT. ~ N w N89°46'49"E -12Q.40' I '3j , c~ (T ~ ~ ~ `-S89'46'49"W- -120.00~~ 51.~g p ~ N ~ ' 4~ - f 0. i w ~ ~ 8 ~Q o 2D' ORA/NAG£ AND 67.99' 33'QO W ~ ~ /RRIGAT/ON EASEMENT N~~~S~• --1 -Ai,. ~ ° 7,920 SQ. FT. ° ° > 191.92' 5 ~5~ 5 ' J Y. O ca~ ~co ( rN89°46'49 E- 120.OQ ~ ~ ~N89'46 49 E -128.48- ~ t i O l_- 4 Z ~ ~ ~S89'46'49"W - - oI ~ I~~~I Z I~ i a Z - -120.00'- - ~ ° q- ~ ~ }rn 25' 25' I t 7,920 SQ. FT. (o ~ ~ 8.842 SQ. FT. 1 r- 9 a CITY OF a ( 7,920 SQ. FT. ~ ~ -S89'46'49"W- z ~ - -S89'46'49"W- - i WHEAT RIDGE BOUNQARY LINE cO ~ ~ - -120.00'- ~ - - 136.74' - ~ 5 U.E. ~ ~ 1 L _ (TYP) _ ~ M N89°46'49"E 120.00' ~ of ~ ~ o I ~ 2 I o ~ ~ ~ °o o° ~ 5 ~ 9',Q32 SQ. FT, co N z TRACT D 0.04 ACRES I 7,920 SQ. FT. ( ~ ~ N o Q ~ o ~ 5' U.E. v i P 0 p cy Z 20" ORA/NAGS AND F .4Nn N89'46'49"E- ~120.OQ' -1 ~ ( ~ z ~ i ~ ) _ - ( ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ /RR/GA T/ON EASEMENT 0 i Q Q~ ~ ~ F- r-- a 1 ~ e Q Q J J J ~ ~ / F- F- O Q Q J J d d ~ J J d a <c - z za ~ b. ~ i i~ a_ r- t- w Q~ Qm J -1 p ~Y j~ D m O m ~a tea; .try"} M C) v C> M (D N Q06._ N~j C> i J © (*n a) CD M. C]C> c:> CO {,J (N N c'Mpp wM00 AP pC:~ NCaC> (v C$ fV KI MELD O .Q C? r or 1,CHAEL 11031 She _ Q a c7 ci CONSULTING, ENGINEERS Westmins- a.wLL zw F-- w --L w sauix aEeec steer. smc we [Xanaao, caaum amn nnE: (30-3) ew-vm rpc: (30) aw-an o o x <o JJ X0 a.CL ,oX , . ~ . ~ i .s. i ✓ fig. ti y ,r ~ / ~ .r, ~ . i ~ . .e 1 • . ~ .r , Y .?;gip;, w :4. I' ~ r d ~ r c . ~ . ~ Via= r ~ ~:il a . . r AN QFFICI L C}EV PME T PLAN IN THE CI . ~r ~ J„ pt ~ i' ~ i . . ~'i APART QF THE SW 1,~4 OF THE NE 1 / . ~i •c; ;3! ; . art; ~ 3T t ..r1 r~~t TOWNSHIP 3 SQUTH, RANGE ~9 WEST OF THE Ci TY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFER SQ ~QVER ' i c 3 a ~ - - - - - ~5r, ~:i : it ~ s . ~ . r,.•;: . K : ~ . . 4: K .,GS :;~.y:~•:• r i~. i ;.5:~: •.i is :~.;~~.i f 5 x of n ~ r 3'~" .v. 4f y g~ ;3 ~ i k y. . # f 1 T T ~'"1'~ yy ~ k . +F " r `3 ~ ~ , ~ ~ : . , r ~ . . . t' .JI Y r i.. ~ ~f ~k ti3 , ~~~`y ~ .';'n..:r«~°}~,,,'~~;ri~ fie sZ~.S'ri~,.':' 1n4t~, • s . . ~ . . l.S,;h ri,9,.~* `Y., y~~y •:....:.v}: ~Y ' y::. ~ d x ~ .G: , ,i .:c...,.. . t SATE DEVELOPMENT STA ITEM RESID MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE 40% BUIL RESIDENTIAL STANDARDS: n s • wr ww a a 1. HOMES IN THE SKYLINE 3 COMMUNITY SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE LANDSCAPING REFER TO SE ELEVATIONS INCLUDED ON THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. OVERALL WHEAT RID FACADE AND ARCHITECTURE SHALL CONFORM TO THE PLANS INCLUDED IN MWIMUM SETBACKS 1 ~ t f • • THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. FRONT 2 2. RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES ON LOTS ADJACENT TO OPEN SPACE TRACTS SIDE 7 SHALL INCLUDE, ON THE SIDE ADJACENT TO THE TRACT, THE SAME f ENHANCEMENTS REQUIRED FOR STRUCTURES ON CORNER LOTS. I ~ ~ REAR 1 _ - a=- POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF RIDGE ROAD, SAiD LIGHTING KCrcn ~v ~c 4. THE FRONT SETBACK SHALL VARY Q MINIMUM OF 2.5 FEET SO THAT NO WHEAT RCD MORE THAN ONE°THIRD OF ANY STREET FRONTAGE SHALL HAVE HOMES f t,~ ~Ct,~ ~ It,~IV LD^~.7U~7 ~1r t I~IC C[i~rt~i~ t v acv ~ rv~v cv°°~va yr ~ c ~c POINT ALSO BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; q. THENCE NORTH 00'13' 11" WEST ON AND ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID M MAY WITH SETBACKS OF 2D FEET. 22.5 FEET. AND 25 FEET. NO THREE REFER TO SE ADJACENT STRUCTURES SHALL HAVE THE SAME FRONT SETBACK. PARKING /HEAT RtD 5. N0 TWO S(MiLAR STRUCTURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED 1MTH THE SAME NORTHEAST 1 /4, A DISTANCE OF 1246.20 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST A i CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1 /4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1 /4; THENCE NORTH 89'35' 34" EAST, ON AND ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF 5 SAID SOUTHWEST 1 /4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1 /4. A DISTANCE OF E 665.06 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID WEST 1/2 OF N ELEVATION ON ADJACENT LOTS OR LOTS ACROSS THE STREET. THERE SHALL NOT BE TWO GARAGE DOMINANT MODELS CONSTRUCTED ON ADJACENT LOTS. THE SOUTHWEST 1 f 4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1 /4; ARCHITECTURE AS APPRO 6. ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES SUCH AS CORNICES, ERVE BELTCDURSES, BAY DEVEL WINDOWS, SILLS, CANOPIES. PORCHES, DECKS, PATIOS, AND BALCONIES MAY THENCE SOUTH 00'12' S9" EAST, ON AND ALONG THE EAST LINE OF 6 SAID WEST 1 /2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1 /4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1 A DISTANCE OF 1068.47 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY E RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF !SAID RIDGE ROAD; f THENCE SOUTH 74'38'30" WEST, ON AND ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY EXTEND OR PROJECT INTO A REQUIRED SETBACK A MAXIMUM OF THIRTY INCHES. 1 LINE, A DISTANCE OF 688.90 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT ACCESS OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 769.656 SQUARE FEET (17.67 ACRES) MORE 0R LESS. BASIS OF BEARING: 7. THE FIRST FLOOR OF THE FRONT ELEVATION OF THE HOME SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 50~ BRICK OR STONE WITH AFOUR-FOOT RETURN ON REFER TO EITHER SIDE OF THE HOME OF DECORATIVE WAINSCOTING. SIGNAGE WHEAT RID FENCING AND SIGHT REFER TD SE a- 1, BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST DISTANCE TRIANGLE WHEAT RID ACCESSORY BUILDINGS REFER TO S WHEAT RID 35 FEET; SI MAXIMUM HEIGHT QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16. TpWNSHtP 3 SOUTH, RANGE fig WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AS BEARING NORTH 00'13'11" WEST. THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE R NORTHEAST Y4 OF SAID SECTION 16 IS MONUMENTED BY A 3-~4" BRASS CAP STAMPED °CITY OF WHEAT RIDE LS 13212" ANa THE. r NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 3 Y4 OF SAID SECTION 16 IS MONUMENTED BY A 2" ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED:'~PLS 19003". 12 FEET; DEf MINIMUM LOT SIZE 7 MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 4Q.00 F 66.00 F 1 l' y~ i t L SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: _ k I, GEORGE G. SMITH, JR.. A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF COLORADO, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY FOR SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NQ. 3 WAS MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION to S ~ AND THE ACCQMPANYING PLAN ACCURATELY AND PROPERLY SHOWS SAID SURVEY. 0 ~c M X N GEORGE G. SMITH, JR. DATE P.L.S. N0. 19003 0 NQTE: a J 1. THE PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL LQT FS N t s TO ANY DEVELOPMENT ON INDUSTRIAL REQUIRED PURSUANT TO SECTION 26- 2, IT I~ THE INTENT TO INCLUDE THIS DEVELOPMENT SCHEQULE: i 1 f o TRACT DESIGNATION TABLE: i i TRACT AREA USE MA NTEN gNCE _ _ _ r > ~ OPEN SPACE, DRAINAGE. HOA* A 118.689 sq. ft./2.72 ac. ERR{GATION f ~ 0 0 THE PROJECT WILL HAVE TWO PHASES f• ~i - ~ ~ B 3040 sq. ft./0.07 ac. OPEN SPACE HOA* RESIGEPtTtAL LOTS AND NECESSARY fM GUTTER, SIDEWALK, AND TREE LAWN, II ONLY THE INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY PROP PHASE UPON FINAL C{TY OF WHEAT RI F ~ ~ .rte:-__. o, o~ ~ Y ~ ~ C 9299 sq. ft./0.21 ac. OPEN SPACE N~a* of m , m D 2400 sq. ft./0.06 ac. OPEN SPACE. IRRIGATION HOA* - ~ o ~ o Q E 8550 sq. ft./0.20 ac. OPEN SPACE HOA* ~ M ° ~ ~ F 9697 sq. ft./0.22 ac. OPEN SPACE HOA* .v. M Ff o ° o ° G 23,969 sq. ft./0.55 ac. OPEN SPACE, IRRIGATION HOA* PREPARED: 09/24/03 PREPARED By. 3-4 SITE PLAN PREPARED FOR: H 34.003 sq. ft,/0.78 ac. OPEN SPACE. DRAINAGE HOA* o ° o C> N \ N N revisions: KIRKHAM M I MEIODYNOMESK 5-70 ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIC OVATION S SKYLINE ESTATES. OR OTHER, HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION AS DIRECTED BY o ° ° ° THE DEVELOPER AND MASTER DECLARANT j 11031 SHERIDAN BLVD. 11 SIGNING AND STRIPING PI At - s I'll w 1-1 w LJICTnDV* I m,.dol~ %4TC-14AF-sT-A L WESTMINSTER, COLORADO 80020 J °-0 CASE PHONE: (303)-466-1831 ;RS 12-14 LANDSCAPE PLAN ,A., ani,i FAX• (.x(13)-4fiF-1R~R ~w~ Cxl-' U- z°w W~S r o o 0 ocr o CL CL zox i low- CVVI lKlU CCTATC7Q SKYLINE ESTATES F FINAL DEVEL~PM E AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CIT A PART OF THE SW 1 /4 OF THE NE 1 /4 TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, ,a TYPICAL SECTIOf R.O.W. R.O.W. 8' _ 50' I 8~ ~ UTILITY ESMT. 1 CONCRETE 2~-~~ 14' SIDEWALK ~ I i~ ~ y6" _ ® _ ti ► 1 J f l TYPICAL LO 1 i a ~ 1 ............:....._.........a....... jt; i i ~W G s.;~„ PROPOSED EXISTING i; R.O.W. s s • S r i t ; f ! ~ Q t;.; ~ ~~F 12' Y ; _ _ ~ ~ (CON I" Yf ;"1 a o.~' a.~~ a t v # v. i . S ~.wrrs eri~~ wr~rrr a 's ~:'t..: r 4 1 "t PROPOSED 5.0' 6" VERTICAL CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 3 0 ~~.w.yt . .......:w ....vw . r.~:, . ?......."."..+A...... >..rm... : F•W~ ffli S .L~ #j J' i . , hn.e.x...r.rr..r ' 1 SIDEWALK a Na PROPOSED 6.0' S 1 I- TREE LAWN '1,~ !'111~III1► M~II~ t: ~ .i 1 W. 54TH AV Z i~ i t.' •J S t L : ~ t.,t n I ?i ~yj Z ~issi ; m 1. . 1d i , t - . , r..... : . ...:r... *i ~3 s ....e-.......... ~1, :.r. 1; t ~ j ~ ti . ...,.,,.,.y......... a ......rte.....:... z f 1 1 7 R.o.w S t 3 w i f o a ~ i ,..je.. . ,..t tr^ he ~ J RIDGE R 1 :r ,'J:i'1: _r~ I. ~ o ~fl ^''~Yr, 1 { 1;. i 'tiq ® 0 W OW~ ~ f i 7 l~ `ni o "'i c- 5. 7.5' 0.5 2.0' 4. fl' 11. D' J J U ~U ~ d v~ ~ 1- Off- O ~ i - i ~ a. Qt~i ~px~ .rs~1~ ® o~~o~ A ✓ ,~,ea."""~ Y ~,.e. f ~~y~ ~/Y ~~J ' s}~~ . ~~i. ~ l~ ~ m o ~ m PROPOSED 7.5' _ ~I'" .mP ~ 1 tA"~ ~.av. .J'~ . o Q ° o ~ TREE LAWN ~ln ~N _ 1 rI . e~ r N N ~.T to f V r_ . u:a:j:ra,: ~r ii1?r.: f 0 0 ~ ~ o PROPOSED 5.0' CONCRETE N ~ N ~ 1 r,,I' v°~,., SIDEWALK (EASEMENT DEDICATED p p a, ~ o , ~ . r...~, ~ - - - - - - r..•, .w°~ :r •~fi 'i I U VVHLA 1 KIUUL c~ Mt'KVVtMtiV 1J 1 Tt'II+HL JGL 11VIV rv ~ X N.T.S. ORIGINAL SCALE: 1 .41 n1•..FI 1 ..V~j j.i,. - - - CD •1 ca o N 04 LtJ ° / c~ d C~ c~ CLLUL- ZW LJ - SHEET 2 OF 14 lor- C>C)x 0 o ~CLva~ i SKYLINE ESTATES 7 3 j S f 3 j i 1 i ~ 3 i 1 ~ 1 f i 1 m . rw am . wws wow w a . w w w a .waewr awa4, ) . wry e{~w ® a s si r n4ww *sw sw® w a44M w www oQ iz i w 4 4r r s w w w ! a ® 6 w w • f w w ® I' A /~~/I~~j s Y ~ Y 1 3 3 ♦ • 1 ° r ,,~~44 wwme asrs sews r w w s w4ww was ~ . went w w w wNws r '7~ • t} ; wrww• • • w w rww r ~ e . • r• w4fwww w ww ma , 1 ti L 1 f arw • r w w w w aan 44r w a' c• ' a w a r w w s f• r ' • a~ ew w r.. s w w~wr w w fw r i '~i;: ~~~~~~I q mr~ i i i _ .._...r,~..,~ r...... m rsnwww wr wrwwwsm w mrr wsaw~s rwwwr w w '~i` ? .''e. awr~4Q o~ ~r s i • wr w 'www rw ePwr w • r® w i w • was w • a a46w wr w w w wrr w w r 4~~ r e . w w wawa a . ® w w a• w w• r: w r r w w m a w wt a• nT""`w w = i' w'wwr www w o awwww w •wwvw a mwa awns: • a wr waMSS 'f i, j . ww a~ w www wwws w swwrw w w w wr r w• w a s ww w ®w s wa w a ww L:... i% i :v;~: t' '1:" a a~ ~ ` w s w a • w wwa s o w w a s s w s w ` a s w w : w • ne'w's s w ~ 4Jf1ar .w e' . „ . , , - •r~w r m myr w s ar w w s rrw°rw w ~ ~.f MJ~~~ 1 :t .2 ,+.e. 7 ti . ,.,.....r.,•....... .rt ::f~ 3 . ~ . . . , i.2 1»iu.»»»ntrt.vr..t.~.t.>avmtrtsv.'it.iya.1J , ~ i 0 = _ . r~ M°"'>. !'Af a i /"1 0 f f'°'4 f°' • C'4 } ♦ } ,/'"tJ f"9~i } y°P1 ~ 9 f}1d1 ~ . , . ,s: ; - - ~ ...r 4~~ ii 3' , , , i~ . ...,.::T .a..... i. ...,...::i::.i:: , '~r . . , ~'t ~i =i•... . • N Sr , n.M1 , , ..ti .a .......r, x.• . .J•: i•N.-: • I::...::t:?.:?: ?7:t'.:S '1:J$~:>: fs;:.. s . . , , . , :•r.:.:rk::::::~rJ3:14::=:i:i::::::i z;.;p;r:~i;s;iSs!'s`:: Fi:;;i.:`'. . • ) 5•::;f:h:;1%S::JJ::?:~:r)::: l:J:;: :?::F;::Y',:::;::J:>;f:?J:Y:,':,. ~~3;:. 3; , ."1tiU:i::.::1;::....:~5+1:'~t ::3~:`:t: 7A':J .1... z~~.L 1:~ ~,:.;i. A..:..:.:.... r~ ri ' ;1~' :;~7:::::ii=':S:i%:::i r3::YiIi: is :I:;i'. L .t J' ns F v ~ =j r ~ 3! ' :2 ~ =7 1 t :1 ~ F t a - / 2 1 ~ i :3 'r i ~3 ' 1 ^ ',r../ t' 3' i i w: I :;E w i 0 8 * id 2 TisB i 1 Y 4: ~ti: J r:ti. _ ~ 3 ~ { %r I: Jf . . :j i i r C.N ~;t t ii ? . :i ~ 1 ~ , 1 ~ ~ i ~ ~ s c. i , . . , ii i ii i-. 3 i ~ • G ,i 1 :i ~ 1::.. ii ~ ,i ~ ~ 9 'f ~ t s , Si ::i ~ - i'G._ j. 1 t 1 E f ;i i i { t ~ ~ t .l...r.r.r.t.. „ n.~. t.. ~r.M. aw ~~~...r..n.,~r.ri.,v..rir..~...~....~. rY. r . a ,~h~~ ~u 1 ~r~ 0 ~ ~ - iii `U, .T i i + ' e 't :j S s A f n. r..r A l" - - _ i7 t +~AF i f 1 V . { 5 f E ? ~ s e # i r 'f. i J ...wo.o m.e..r~r L t y 1:: ~ • C~ _ 1 ~ i. i ~.c ,4 I i `''r.rrr- :l • f i; ii :i . ~ o ii A 'si . .i ....i...... 77 ii ~ ',j :1 i` r :I ;:t .r. s ~ 1 ~'7 ~ I~ :%S 7 ~~i~ ....r.i A f, _ 1' ,f j ii F •i . ? t i= t ~ <1 t . a'.,: f s - i I i ' i~ ""~7 ~ ~ 71 = i = t" t.: _ ~ i t'. s .If- rsrr rwrr Aw oaww • w r w rw • ®i wy° w w swoT • ° •ww wwr • w Y w m r w r r r w r • r rrr° m °r~ M rwmwa r ~F~ w w rm wr w a rams wrrw ww~w w s r a w srww: s~ ~ r' _ ~ Li m~ w• a a el+ r w m • r ws r i~: rs M m s° m rmr arw •mw ° r r mws +m Ic s w s~ ~p s r w r wip m r r r r , e ~hP~r f. r°wr • • w rrswr s r rwwr room ww° w r w • war i t: v,~' 1 7 t': T- w w r m® w wr w r t 4 'I • w 1~ 3 • w wwwwr r ~ rw rrrw Y r' z. • ':.i.. rsr: • rrr more r wrrrw r w woo r Y e d""yar w is° r wr rw ° ° wr a +ri wi ? y~ V+ : i t w r r w r w w r o w r r" a'~r e i ol~'r s i rrr w r • °w° a m wm r w r wr w w w .i~,. W eA ~ ~ i': t/~ ~ w,,,,,..,.,.,, ~3 i,, i r: L Si ~ . t;. O C? ~ ii ~ ~ : r i ~ ~ _ .r..._.." CJ : ~ is S :a ~ ~Q ~ a~ ~ Z C~ ~ .t Q >,.Q a _l Cl.. c-- ~ y. Ll.i W ~ t4° a1 ~ ~ 4a ..r N .~r}; ih ~ ~~'F <; i ~ a ~ s• .z,Y~~ , r ....y. ~ ` "r ~ ~ ~y .,,.n,,., • ~ ~ C~ c~ c~ U ~ d ~ / x ~ ~ • O N (,L lL ~ . L~1 tY ' i^f11 ~ ~ ~ r' C3 ~ ~ ~ 4. ~ . ` Q .~-,.O Y i t-- a N i N ° cv N c.~ o s _ _ i 1*4& 49' F. ` 1. i R 10 00 120. 0) I 1 4 10 ♦ r+~ T 4 N~ }~N -RENO IRRIC CHEM 0} QJ M 00 JU M i O CD 3 I1,t,0~ i MOIL ~ N N C]d fl"a Tf;trc T D ! W ~ / tb Z ~r W- • : t••• • ! 1 t P S ~ %7# ~ 22%117'1 •i•..~•.• avuvt t n•" t t ~ f! •i I ~if~ 2'i i t 1, 1 7 dw !3 • 7 . i . . yr v.u•: •:.:v ; . 1 , 1 L 7 .f .vv'•. ITS'. 1.1.1.. Et .1 S i. i.t17 NO 11.2 .:t l: I•I i i'• i ~'i 1 • . n 1 s a a:h 11 1 i lLt--!% 7 w. J. ,.t....>:.re' .1 ..1 h'i :7. 1 li .31f•. .1., i....i.., . < .t h 1+ 1 ,4 •t l„ lsl. a.,a• s . s S89*46 ..':F :.h... : i..:'7 1 . • l l i 3 3 .:•h•7 .h, 7 •s#..... s a,• ! w s.1 it •i rJacall a t . 3• •ah..+. : r •f 7! 1 3. •3 .•3• :1'~ } 2•"3''!' ..7 ••I hi 3.1.... I 3 i. I r 1 i•.h:•.h•:... ,Y"'+I•' ~•+•a 7a'. t 1 •i I 3 i :SC• + t 3 r r. h ,7 1 1 . l•.. 7 t ! ,N 3 3 r~..! 1 r 1 ..,s.- ! . s 7 . . 3•. t i° ri:• . .1, .,•.•..~h,•.r a s. . a ;1•: A s . r , . .•;i":#' . -•s•.••. U! ss i.. t. t a 7•u. i ..1. I .•.I+r.'.. J.:. f , ::a 7 . . • 7 7:.. 1 a• a. s r . ia•Y.L• . i a. I .1 . f. .•3•.•.. ..i r.. : a1. J 7 R+'• .P.w l:w: .•t•:%•%f:5..i•.•, 7... i'7 . 3 7 s . 7 a •z. i 1 t 7 . I•:+: • a•.•.:•I•+•i : . t 4 i• a xi . .1:•3 . I t v,•. , .i . 1 I . h • . t :i .a r. rt.+,•, v~ • 1t• v . L . t 2 . Y.• • 1I}' itiiz' i a . N 101 i•• Ns 3 4.! v +i . a•.•: . i .v • t . J- 'a+7•: . I 3 i NIfN.v :174r :•f•:•. : YY v . : w, : r • . h3 . ,.:+.....7 :.r s I . ' . 3 • .•i :t, JI ••rJ :1:a . .h• •j; NN.•. 3 ~ ' f• . . • ••:.F.. . s t:~::::I •r. "233. i •3N :7' r ♦ :I+: 3•N .•Y:+: •a..1 i S . t . F i::~I ...•f } ~ p, ...7 , . f 1 , ,....v .1 , r.. r••. , , Y• ~i t. t. S WiS: .•1. s. .r Nt. s a rilN : N. i.rr:r:: • t 3' Y: +1•r w ,.L'S3-'f.H•3h h •3•. ri 7•. f. , ,•3• •i•r • .332•-?. r7%•fr::S•f:: , r i1: . rr: :•Ia • .iwa^1• •:,'r: i?:•:a•)• S S af• +7•' . 3• :•i 2 yr v'v .d•. •.t '•f.v:ra r7 . .7 s .1 . . 1•NN.. . i•3. 'a•N' rarlGS'rft' •7•:. S w N7•.. ri•: 7 +11•f::53%.v l •S . .}r,. . :j,. ,rf•. S. :$il :a .•1.33:• 35'Sf• .a•.. .q• rlSr . N. t . ..j. 2 . 7aa• 5'i•' +:dJ•'•.•r.•;•.. t a,h,. , •1•' •r: r' "Sti: i 7 •Y+ 'S'r 5$`•. Sa 3•. I .••N•. • . t - S a +i S' }l~:1r :,3517'!%1 ,1 S • Ss•. •'f•1 •s:1 : N . z . : s' :1•: • n!•.•.h• : Yd.•r. ,a+x• 7. .J.. itis:: .iN.. •Sr'Sii$•.3+, ..j.'S:j.;•,.,: ;.i. ..•1.+..•i %•.•.%.4-. ••Y3✓ 1, 'itr• :d 5`ti. N .1 •j31 •.ai r7•: .t4. r+ .+7:r : %'Y3•F: i •'•i••+S :a' . bil•7•'•:•'%: • : f . t . • 'r';33N . Yi' I • • avi s:' ! f :•YS•v:a : jJ i • v ; '.v , ••f , •:3: titii. } , ~ .j.r3,3'S:?S•'7'1:%'r.•, • S•. , .....•YV::'•f%:3 2'.I .}:33 Y fs S$i.: •:,s• i .3NYhI .r N.2$3::•.::::•• ......r.. :•t . •ai' :J . ..5• + v 7•: Y.. i''f... f. 3 . ..a , r.• 311' • 1 2 I 72 : N ~}Fr: y . 4 S i.. :YH: + : 3' ~ J i•5 , .....a r :S. '111• 'i I +F i•• r .4^• •t+. f.. w.h . S' %.7+ h4 1 ''r.• 'Y.. •S. f•5 ••tr t • : t • •i , , : sr:::1 Y.•.•.v:r•. .4 ::11' a.• . i . : iv . : f .ih:•;,7:j: ,v . .3 3 :i :jiv '.L .y{j'. j •:^5 •Yiv 3 : 2 . •.f:. . i S .:::33...•w..7•?Si6::::%: i •1I, 2:N...1 . Fr.. p • 3Y; {1' S1^75rS ..•M•:I;•I%:.::•, Y a+:•N ,S„ r .vri•f.J3+:SN3;:•:1~N.vvJ.vv7•':•31Ia+15f3:i' 3. ri !a•i.r, Nih•:.•1•Ft:•9:•:.a :tiii}?;i:!$SiMit , iL}3} 3#:::.. fiw,?;~1:323?,3isi:i%.......iS ..:.i.:..h :.s.h.. r ..:;t.r...d s 3::....• r :ai} :z :•sa::a :aat: z a• F-mMgp: ;a: e :S:C,h. •hr:i ir...ti:ev:.Ll'~:M•.. 'a: 1.1.3 ':1:1 7 y' 32. :1'• }i3• :•.,.w it/M•: . J . f.3'. . i . 1 ,i,il:•idlk . . S,: " J,.• .r~ .i. :1:•. 7: 3 : 1'x'1" 1 r: : f% 7 M• • ::r, 4 '%]:r' i 2}S}Y 7•s: Q• -0:. . r.:. 7. . t . r,•,:•: ,•,•::::a:• ,.::1,•:;:e::.hh} ' iii;} :;•;r.. :.<h: •r7•$f: , 1 r.. .J, .r .v .r.• 'S~ t~ r i}i 'ii' :.J•i}i • s . '•J': • : is:,...iis r SHEET 3 OF 14 F- Ld LL LD 0 ~«.J a a., F t F SKYLINE ESTATES S FILING NO. 3 FDP J T T T 1~T r'! ~T n ~ :':i f•rv ••::ti •i:%:i %fr%i:f'i' :i;t?'tY?57i:i;i+~ i i:;;: i'v'i: %i •qc is it: ,.~.:.:a:,.r,:;.,3•;:. ;.,:.:•.,:,s.:':•.. ;'•r %:I ~'i'. 7 .t.. t,. 3 .f,'t...,.t - .m : • . '1 r l :i"'3? i E•i'i:'i:i "i'I'ss: t t f 3•. ,.,,a k . 3 , i , , . 3.^T... 1 .•1•''7 "i ~ 7 :3'•:•-;:; • . 7 f f:F' :%1•fr: ,l 7,• t. i., i . 1..6•.'.. . 1.,I i h 1 ..7 7• 11 1•,. y 1 . 1 . Nt :.t•.;c.•~•x:~•::.;:.;:•.,•• .t. 77.. a ..7. i l,Etl : E•. •t..l.lttt.h.l 1• r. . ~~I t~t t l i 1 ; i f 1 ~ 7 !.t i .yl i ~ ~ . z 'i''A. F ~'t:s., i).t.N,•1• , !7t ..i ~ 1 i t ? E r i 3 7 i' t t . tt.1.1 t .J, h•. . I . 3 .a t ..4 ...2• . t :d•.. .i ••a .•:s:••:, :•"1 . `v f k,F I 1at.l. 2 • 1••:.:•.y'r+'•:: •rv:.:y: h,,: R.•: 777; r••:.: t.... S I ~ .I hi•,• :.7 •.•i i • . 1 ..I... 1r .111 .v 1 Y I. ,l:• N..5......... i l.. ..•{•r,. ;'sti'r"%'%•. .f.t J. 1•t7:v; :•7,.•. iv ,..2,. ..t•t•7• .q 5.:::v. "4 ' f 1 f t l I . 3 S . i 7 . I . I 1 h. ..4 7 1 ! :.d•.. i . • t r . ...4•, . :1••i'i%:. . 7 al i. aifiF. s.. ..I 3;.1•... f.......t i •r.;...... ri ..t ..f,tn. r, 32 tf.•...,. •h•• t t , 4 , r l t 7 . d . . 7 ':h;.;?: .:f,•f . I . : .:3• 1 x.:. t .i . 7 . , .•..sa• . 3 3 , . rt ..tr,.,: :.F . t: • , .a . s . t ri , . a • : i . r.v .t. . t r:.: • . .1 1 t... . . s t...:..a...~' h :.,h,•..•,Gr•.. • r:r:;•t• t l i e... . r.i, f f 7.1... .i . t.. A7•y,•, •7.... r..f S 1 7.7 h,i .r.. v. ~.r..... i. . S . 7 . F ~ ;t:.: r..... •1...:;•Ph 2 . 3 i i I . S Lr7:.,v . ...s...r ..s, . f. . i 1 ,vd• •••:I. 2 , l . F f . i . f ~ •.•.v .•lv . ! . 1 1 . r7 ',-0V•7 L .1• ..a ,,.•ss , 3 . i . t l .r. .4.' ri. t. i. t 1. Y. 1, d. ~ .t .r.. ,t• : 7 . t • .7 :•r. 7 : 1• ....f . .r'il'.i. ...i . • 1•.7.;. •h.f. . 7•:.• 2 •r'.•1%.r •,:r.::•:S , r:... . 1 ! 6:Air;y:;7 `t:::• 7 • h' . I r L.: i '•i%3'%F"' 4 } . , +•%i:7''i'• v r.. •'-0 3 ..r•: 1. , i•r . 1 W,vv . !r•. ..':;'7.:v :3:1.7 i%'h:' y Sl . . 7 .t?7"t. .1: ::f•'• h'•• 'r.. •I. t I.5,.. •i•1-, .N 'dG t. i 'tt^ 7:~6 r • Lf~ 7i 7 r ':1 .rt...:7r5''i • h' .,j F : 'r7•:=, H.~.. ~ :.71;3 . ~3:1r:~1 i•: :i'3`• •F~ ......,Inn . i:i''i•i a •f•: i3i'. 3' >9% . t . J a i : :n.?. r.:% . rl;, %ir": ci: .iii is SE 9?'i?r :h 'h'• i~'% 1 Esl:i'J:i •.1 .SS':ei7. n.. r.tl', .v:jr.., 1~A, ri:,i%3:7..,`3. :7 .7 i,: 2:7•• .r i d . I: ,:::a:3,,:,.,:.r:r~7~ , . I' ViP n%ili G::a : ?;'ii` ~ k<. :.1.;;.t:.vl r :1': •h7 +.F :%i317: '.=n'r'l;i.t.•ri3ir:ii:1.:1.I3r.t3dr...+i~ irJ.....t.•X..s...r~.,..o.*....n.3.,...i:?L np•kc .l1~'~iiF.'~• .n .,.j.~?..s?.:?rrt'~.:u,:t?i;t~?S?.?n...r.7:r ~i::a.1....,>...t.>;3:?...~:r:ftk...~J.4„rr.::r.......,..:~: , f• Ir;: ri Y;t;:;•t"":: :a.: M'..,. ~ y.. i` 7i"•i'::. it: 7:'i''i"pir" - (:;7: 'ft''•:St7'•:::, I 2f 7 f.H i.t12 v f 7,7 i I 7a r .f i 3 2 l.s t '•I•''•" ( f• t. at 1 X t 1 ••s•:.'•t~ • I . 1 r r i r• .d i , s3h• . i . # ,i•! • ; ~ : :f'~ `.::rf.; - ~.,.3..: « t . i 7 137. , . 7 .1 . 1 I.v - ':d::- 3 f 1'., i, 71•..3. 7• .•i. t: " : 3aa .:r•• p: . k . f •i': r• s a i . • t r•t . a ...i . v..d ; j ,•.1•i~:.;..;a•:~:.:~-.: z s t ~~2`. : 3 i : es. 3 s. t I . ..r•.a• }i..r.•a:•F• •?I-r:•••': ! 1 ! 2 . 1 f+i S• 1 i +7 : t..#. .t .a 4 7.,.. .••1 F , - t t . 3 E •z t r •:•f. i::::•:n•o-o:•' c ` tY . . •r l, t ^ i rs , a r i t r •7 •:•f•. , . .h t , t , :a a a 1 f .r'i .3 3 g 3 i .s s a. k. a s .i• f.. •i :tir i•: - i t i.t3 s t I... ...1, 3• ':iq' t ~ t.,.a•• t .r.... , t ) 7.... r .t. .s ..r,. ti••:• ::i:•:. . I t. .ti ":rl •t'i`r`1 • .i . 1 ••t •I f• i 1 r'i 7.• E 3 r . 2 7 . # ' rh 7• I , 2 I . t F L •a •i ~ 4 t ! r , . 3 i 7 1 1 7 l•.• 7 •.•t : : t . # :..t. • :d 7 , •v 7 •1 • i. . 7 t i 7 1 i•' ~ i i ,•i 7 i f• a•*:::•:• 1 7 1. ,1• . ' 03•::f~ i:9• ,.Y s 3.7"fr3.t. A. .cl r. s •h sr...... s,a .+:i S.a i ,.~t~•> t :f•:. i 1• 7 t a .!"7t... #..r z. ..t ..F. l 7r:4 . f . . t t i t• 7 . , :a , t . • •r• . vt • , .a r• •rzf S I ':•I•`•:+' ••'i:'•"~ : 7 : i. .37.1,. •.1 w..1.. . 7 1• , i ir'*:•:• ':•:i::, t i .73, I..t i.. Y. i. 7 t,, :.,1. I 7• , i7 rI••••..:.•r.. 1. 1. 1. h•t.' :;:t::; : ; t. r # ! . iZ i .:s.•••.• ..L•., 3 . l ...a•r• • . i S F .a . , . .3 i,. i..... :.•r. f.•.. . i, ,d• . •1•. I i 7 t a .1. :''i 2:'"i s : 7 t t L •I F : S v .:n.•• t•• : • • d. i ! i t , 1 : 7 a . : t 7•• .L .3•, i• t. I s .vr. • t•,.i a . 1: 2~3 i Y : rfr.: t.7 3 ,J}•.. i r f•. f• • •t r b. i f.• . i . 7•~ , . s . a !•..4 i•.•. r:., , i r . r ~ .3 . . , r . ,r'i.;, s . , fi i i 7 t . •,ai .i• t F i .i, t7 : •i h .'1•. H :,i: r S. 11.1:ri•. 7'. "7 h 7 I 1 7 1 . , h . ~ 7 7• ri $ t 1 # • :•l . t. i :"i::i 1.h , z .i:.; . f .•1 i r . 1 . 7v . i 13. i . i r• .•.:I . t r;b`7 ,.:3z:..i3 7 ••;.;.3.., •.n•:••:.. r..... :a.i••c••. , , i...zY. ~ r..t•:•:•zs . •L•...... t• .i z,• ..s 7ti '.V t#' 3 r: '•f t rf . V . F• •i . i Y i..7 L• ♦ : •i. rr •.•f '+r: 1 v' .i. .a i^ .7: ~ 5 •.r. , :.a,• . r c,.....:. . c • •.U ..L~:. . .3,'3,7..., 4~ L.4...,. ':7t•,. ..S.:a• t 7:. ..r... `•##t•. i3•'•. ~ . F.. :••rt r•• a .i • . •~i.•. 3 ..r t .;7:ir•;r:, t•. • . z : ..,fi. • t . I' r : t i ,t.f.:. : y a •r a 7 . ':.•.t:,: r r t, F:.:. : . Jr :.i i . s7 : , ••.t ...Nt .E...: 7 . a• ::•.a~ .v . ::•a:• . 1 3 a• C . , •3 ' # . d Y7.3•'.:- 3 •:i•. .'.;.t........ f : I+::• 7n t : ji : #..h. 3 . r i:.;-0r;+:;•$i•d;hh3' f.•4•....•. ..i.n:::~;,; 1 1 .g#v , 1, ..:••1^'•~:Y' i ri~r:hft • •7+ I 1 : 3 C 1 , i 3 . N, •':1• .f r d.•.,. ..I .•7. ..7 , 1 .i.. ,i..•; 7.. t >•N... :Cq i+7.7•:'x: ~ .1.. A,f ::.r•:•::t : r .1 n.i... t . s . 7 t s r 3• s . t r 3•,....: a. . s::•.,.•. r y .i' ..t.A:S • .a.. ..t, .•r'•7•: .3,• ...I,••. •ri+~: .3::• .s .t r .t•.• ••a•:,+: .a••,~. vr. .s t •7•r....d••. '#t 7 • s tt ..7. t f . a.,... .4. . : # . 1. •S'iF••• . r .•:•1•.•r:: +`.,3:•. 1 . . 4 ..i i ..Sa$•. , L i . ,t... ! f • a* a .•:s ; r t n... t .r'r: , i i . r . , r.:.r.. i .:f P .r.• ••t•.s. i i ..i... 3 .•s.• •z••• ta,•..• . 1 s! i .ad•: ,d •..:..:f.. 1•.• : e S : • s• ^:S%•;::•• S ! # tt~~ a. t+. t.. i :.:rt...... Sv ✓l .l•' r. l.. .•7•I. 7,.1. 1 ir.•'r. + •'3 •9' N t t !ti'•r:•• r v, . . 1s . 7 . s . •3::: v.. i.,. q , ` f J'S . 3fa,: a . r , it t S~ . • a f•+ f. •t: , t r i : t•• t : a r . s , s t.• zi•;i'• i r .7,t : nF' ✓ # tin .•3 .1. f• i .7 1•, .i i a . r' . ! r . ~i• » iy s v:7• -•9 .h•::• # t f... r .1• ~ • ~•t>:s.•.. . i` .r v. .t. ` 1 .L:tt .r. t,~ 3 v .s, t#.t• f••' at s. n.t. . i•• i . r . r ::Ji f 7.•t i•' t . . t s •:h :•rt r • • t ~ ......a+.L r. . s?sY . r•. t• r.i. •Vn . a . ^i'3•i b s•s•: 1 • v r.:a. t 3 , . .h vf': yr a• . i•. . f r.7 i . S i • 1 • : A.' n.... .n:~• r 1•i : rn , t . •.F., ;.;7:. •,f. F•: r7 •a r3 •P.• i r:ij). '•1I .il f.. •'S1. i.• : S 3 +a . t . , t . . r :•f• • ..7.:i:rr • r. ':a . . i•t . z . .•r. t . I:. .1 • z. ,.y,•...rr"• •a r ~•f•: •Ii• . i • : 7 . i , sa } . 1 r. .r.:.f .r3n{ :I:f' •i•. .•Y:•t -r• .s: .7 t Sp.. •t .•.:3.... 9:: r.' t i r •:i:' i• . u3• • •:k . .v ..3rr'r#r:r:t.r ..t....~ 4: 7. ..7 •irt%• ~ #L . i : ♦ • 1.,.. qi • :•:{i. .t .1 . • t ••r •'•f•. 7.1 f . G' • i •a• • ir•p I •u~'h•: . i il.?''~ r •L .t•• i 7#i7~•:•: • .7 i : .•r l f v:~:<:i:%:,~`23...t~:t.s. i r•. •Fi•7 7 . :i7~••:•' •td r r .r•:. 1•s . a r f . t i>ii • .i::.. : ,.~%,t .a..t.,,... ~•3•: : 7 ra . t M . h.?rt,..i✓':7#Nrr#. ,n:- } ,.n . , r.%n+:+:fC :•ra• ; #h:ii. Jt . i 3 , , .,•,.niir. r.r.,°.::r, A9#',!n t i%: rt . r:i ##i:~ t• d#7* ~L . is• • • J ~ r #t:d?# a.,,....1:%.......%ri , . '1 . , i.• r .•t s,. `•Y' t#'•• ~ • '7•u . s i' .:;ra . r:?7%.•.rl'r':r...r.r:r.i . r,.tl9.I,,..r.:.,.r.,,..:.uS.isr:r...1n.i...!:7:r....L.r:ts..::rv,.:..att:+3•.w ~ ~r~ew.w,. r~ #iP•! ~ ; ?iJ.:i?9r~:. 7is%3;#;;`r;? a . : i;•i' i , ,?..:~.tti;'rf#K l..r '#rrr U..:r r;s a ....ar..+.~ • 1 s3 i tj:: S 3iy.;•, , 1 r' ` `I i ' i;: I I I y "r Iti rih. t s 'MmP ! r ;t YY r 1 : ~ . : ` 7 ~w{+~ i; V J 1 ••F • ~~R/j~ i• I~ • ~ Y--~ ~~X4 . . It ~ t t • ! 1f i:. 1€ ~ . ,r; - 1' t: i i • P aeMwr~ rrrr~rr. +wonwr.r ~ 4: ~i~: : S ! . ' 3: . . ~ : , ~ * 7 { : : ] { t i 7 I ~t• ? i . r: ~ ~f : r t F; . ' 0 t 4 v; - ? "I 2 . a~~ err-,~.~~ ~ i s:' :i ii i j I:: ? %i ~ • F< . ~.i ~ ~ .rte _._._._.y. ,ww~ t:. '3 i i:`: 1 st►s~ sear ®ws sssw wh ash sass s sw ~ r, y i i( s? i w s s w s , w s a • w• i ,.,,.:.:;i, 1: ~ sstriw s~1,s w •wws s s was rss s ® , • • i ,s s s w a s r s s a i , , a • wd w wsw asw ssssssw i t 7:: t 1 ,I" 3 7~ ' •1 's i - :NT PLAN ssr s ao ss ®s • sass ssww rwr w w • a w a sswrs s ® 'I n.. ,r'~ w • w w i ww • w aPw s s w ~ w • sr • • m un:>,: 7;{ www w w ® w w w MtR ®iA1t4 6® aB ~ B !Ilt1l1 tl1® ~ 1 I~ t ; yw w w • wY®w w 711 wwM iMY wi® w i • w M711►M ~liwj . ti_ J ~ .r3.. i ~~/~7t 1:'. s w s • ♦s s• • s r • s 1 i ~trr,..r r=' sww w s • w w s w ors w w CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE is s r s w.s w i i • •s sw • • ■ ears s w ws~ •s sswr 1 • s 1 t; wssr a wN sews s sssws • s aa® s ~ 2 7; z~r: ~I is : was . . « . s1.w w w i 2 7: : ` t ~ • iE is 't' f r:1 i' ',~t•'• } :~i? ~ i ti C V ~y s i ~ Ut : , ~ VVIVL!!#~ 1 V is i ~ T~ ~t :7 .i ♦ R ~ C~•: re ~ ~ C"~ 1 ;,..7. 3: ' ~ a t . iii: ; i, f. i ~ o ~'rii~tl1R 1 • q::i em j: ~ i . 7 i c i:i 7 ~I is • 5 ~`1' A_P+.L! C_R I#1 ~ 1 _ ~ nor r3~-f ~ r x_~ ® 3 7 :%:J 4 A ' W ! ~ . '1 t , :t i i ,,s~ , - ::i 7 t~ C) x~ _ ~ ~ w E - 3s ~ . ~i i 'il .<.'si'""~~ i nr'.~ i t:: 'i _ i Fri z 2: 'f. 't-: i ' • % f ~ t : `i ! I' , r .Sr is 7 :i ICI' Y :i .1;' ~ ~ i~. ~ i~ in"-' Fri .i :3' -J,. /r ~.i:."°~ Iii} i „i . t;"'' Y :iii . ;r~,:. r. .iii: . i.fi ,:j ~ 7> .jii.. .i i, fl,s ~ g~ .7, s ,.:i i ' .~Y > 3' r • t i t~R1~~NAL SALE: 1 " =4th' i i - •i i .r s i . i i ii ~ i i; r x 1 ` ` ~ ;i 1 ~ ;i 9 it t1 I f ` fi m, ! ~iE I '7 i 3 ~l f ~ li I i i. ii i a r s i 1' • d 7' 7j s ♦1~N ii • ' ::'1, it i. ti i3 ;e i =i Lt A.1 l E" ~ ~1.._~"'f"'r' l'~~"'1 l~ l1 Tt 1 ~1 1 i ~ ! C1 ~ C1 i! T_! f - - - t--- ~s - - - . - y ~i t y, ~s i ~ ?i 7 ;t ' 1 i ? ~ ~i ~ N { .7 2; 1: i 1~ 4 'fi 1 i 7 4 i is i Y. I r"~ i 1 = I _ i = I 2 i~ ti. i C ? I • ~ 3 d* ~ 2: `y~ ~ 1 ~j^y ] :E 3 .~,J _ • y 4 Y' 4 Q ~ ' i t]. .i ~ J i ~ - ' 1 R { ~ i t i$ . c • ~ : Y Z ~ Z U i 3' <C Q i a ~ ~ . ~ ~ J Q. d-' c- ' 7 I F"' (y 1 ~ ~ _7 j ~ ~ ~ ~ a s.. a 1. ` _ i i LL ~,,.r Q. t 1 C3 ~ . ~ ® ~ r ~ ~ } . ~ 3 ► i ~ ~ tb ~ ~ € ~I' i a- C3 ~ n ~ : 'y, ~ ;ilia Y ~ i a` j~: ~y.~~'/~ 'r iL G3 N ~ ~ Vr ® e- ® ~ CV r e-- i Q CS a•~ 3 r- s :::r,. r•_ X 30050 s w r _ - - N . Cl- LLJ LL Z Uj F- W F- F- Or- LL SHEET 4 OF 14 QQX'~ CLdL -,I a ~ FILING N0. 3 FuP SKYLINE ESTATES 1_ J }Y_ t } 4a a _ _ - 1 i i r t- i~i~ ii ~~~i III ill II 11!111 III II II III II II I( II II 111 II ~I 0~1L~C~ ~~~0 C~ 1 4 x 2Q28 FH ,I a a r i t L. 7 t-,-~- j L~ ~ 0 0~ 0 0° ~ - ~Q Q Q J 1 J _J W W- -J O W w t1') ii 1 Z = r- U yy_ fi{ ~ ~ Q Q ui ~ ~ ~ ~ n- U [ , p D t13 I_i_ LL j ~~C n- U - - - ~ ~ / ~ - - Q~ Qm - = 00~~~ - Nl~f7 Np - _ v M N M ~ 1 t O f") ~ t~ N ni N L,C) ~ - . - O ~ Y O~ 0~ - II II f I ~-I - - _ ' I~ II II ~I \ ~ N ~ CO ' ° M CO C'7 \ O O O M N N O p z O 2029 CRAFT Z ~ 2 LL Z ~ D W z b SHEET 5 OF 14 X LL 0 ooomo a ~zo~ X028 CRAFT SKYLINE ESTATES ~ FILING NO. 3 FDP SKYLINE ESTATES FI FINAL DEVELOPMEN AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY r A PART OF THE SW 1 /4 OF TF~E NE 1 /4 O TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6th CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, S REPRESENTATIVE ARCHITECTUR 1L 111 m i' r~ J U L ll . , . 1~ 1 Ll_ll_.1( ,~.~1..-,-u u---! ~ (1 11 I f I V'/~r'~,.'~ b~.~"~.`~.`~LL~ ~ - _ - _ _ _ _ f --r---vim 0 0 ~ ~ OOC i f } o ❑ _ - OD 1 C = 2034-C-DD a N j ~ 1u ~~t 1 ~ u 111~u~. ~-1_ 1 r •i _ 0 0~ ~o a i i 0 0~ ~Q a a~ > > w w, -J O W W t.C) i ii I = c~ V ~ ~ Q <C ~ r ~ C3 ~ n- U , D D cn i.~- u- i~ i ~ ~ n- v - ~ D - - - ~ Q ~ - D ~ ~ ~ Y _ - - ~ 'Sm ~m O ~ . r / ~ Q N~ NO {ter? N M ^^J O p M O pN O~ ~ M n ~ a D~ D\ RIP C ~ 00 N 000000000000 0 0 0 000 000000 Ch t0 C") \ 00 DM N N O p z O _ J ZE Ztl 2054-A Z H ~ J QDLL C.7O Cl.WWZW X 3., LL O O Q 0 S c) m O CL a- ZD~ SKYLINE ESTATES -}'J SKYLINE ESTATES FI FINAL DEVELOPM EN AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY A PART OF THE SW 1 /4 OF THE NE 1 /4 0 TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6th M . . CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, REPRESENTATIVE ARCHITECTUR ~0 llu_ IT~~I ~TTI n n ~ ~ - . ❑o w ~x V r P. -rt.. rr++.wa+eewwrreres ~ a,. ,ro. 0000000000>O OOOOOOOUO`~O ~u~ f ~-F - _ f 1 L ~ ~ 0 0~ i Z zo 0 or 1 r ~ ~Q Q d J 1 W W J J p W W ~ .1 Y Z Z V V I F. ~ ~ f' Q a • v { 1}. ..w +~l. 0 o cn ~ ~ ~ i oQ o~ j~ jY k, d Dm Dm s i ~ O ~ Q M ~ O Me- M~ i .,on, ~ "a+ y r a O O w r ON O~ 1 I ~ w . ~ ~ - - M 1 S D ~ D J~ J~ ~ O ~ ~ N~ N~ M C~ M Aviv-v O O O M N N p O Z O Z~ ZLI.. I F-- to QDU- CAD C.-L.Li ~ZW 31,- LL O ( I -j DO ~ ~ D SHEET 7 OF 14 CL CL ZO~ SKYLINE ESTATES Fl SKYLINE ESTATES FI FINAL DEVELOPM EN AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY A PART OF THE SW 1 /4 OF THE NE 1 /4 0 TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF' THE 6th CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, REPRESENTATIVE ARCHITECTUR o~ ~v~ ~ 1 1 _ ~ ~ - Y "R "'C.. ,.4 . 0' r c t 1 i ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ YO~nll ui vi ~ z zo 0 0 Q Qa w w w w ,°.r, I J i ~ - I z z U U 1~ Q Q ~ i ~e -_-'z__ i ~ p [L ~ v i 7 1 i D D t./) L.1_ LL / / - ~i~ ~Q j~ ~Y r I. +s, ~r f' 1~ Lu~~T ^f . ~m ~m L / cc~ ~ Q ~ o M O M `7 O M O ON O~ 1 ~ M 0 ~ D ~ O I J ~ J ~ I ~5 40, C) 00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - rrurr r r ~ ~ N Mto M\ O O O M N N p ~n ~ w 2033-C S ~ S IL Z ~ N aoLL cD o riL.Li Lij zw ooxao JJD~C) SHEET 8 OF 14 D.. CL ZD2: SKYLINE ESTATES F s SKYLINE ESTATES FI FINAL DEVELOPM EN AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY A PART OF THE SW 1 /4 OF THE NE 1 /4 TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6th CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, REPRESENTATIVE ARCHITECTUR - ~ _ ' tUi Y...... a" ~ . ~ ~ .w.. y. e ^ r " r r s _ _ d i 1 i { i ► I ► ~ ► ~ ► ► r i o~ i-- w C_~ C~ ~ D D~ (n ~ Z Z O O O H ~ Q Q Q J J J i ~•.x-_ W W J -J p W W ~ ~i S S~ I i t 1► 1 4!! 1► I► f~ ►I I f i i~ 11 I s ►i ► I I U C.~ ~ ~ Q Q ~ ~ ~ ~ D D c!) LL LL ~ / A OQ ~ ~ j~ ~Y - ~ ■ ~ ~r C'~ m C7 ~ ~ D~ DQ M O M O O t"~ O ON O~ 1 ~ M o° o M r_--,r--~ Y J . J o 1 N N F=~) m IFS ,0001 C) 00 IH I i O O O M CN C"'-4 O O ~ 2125-A 2125_, C I ~ Z LL Z QDLLt~D 4-WWZW 1-I-x3: - O O (D ~ O SHEET 9 OF 14 CL IOL ZD~ F SKYLINE ESTATES FI FINAL DEVELOPM EN AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY A PART OF THE SW 1 /4 OF THE NE 1 /4 O TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6th 7J CITY OF VIMEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, 5 REPRESENTATIVE ARCHITECTUR i i] J i a. i_ 1 ~I, I, ICI ,1~1 ,I, 1~ I~r'~ i II [11f111 t ~ ~ ~ r 4 . r t-- 1 7. . e sue. t i s_ e t i 1 € i 0 ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ D ~ ~ - u'i t!i ~ z zo 0 0 4 ~ ~a Q Q J - - t J J ~s ~i- 1 W W J p a W W ~ ii a I Z Z~ V U ~ ~ , ~ E s i1 Q Q ~ i i ~ t. _ ~ a- U D D t,/') J I.L LL / / f~ - - _ I r o Q o~ ~I I~~ I I II I I 1 iil~l j~ jY C7 ~ D m O m a I N N ~ p M Q'1 M ~ N N N ~ O N O ~p Q~ - - _ - - - - - I 0 00 _jf All 00 00 _ I E: :1 _ - CN4 CDz o ~ W W Z W F-F-X~- I O O C) or- O 0 CL Z D >7 i _1 SKYLINE ESTATES F FINAL DEVELC~PME AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CI A PART OF THE SW 1 /4 OF THE NE 1 /4 1 Y r TOYVNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE fi CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, f fT SIGNAGE AND ST NELSON A w. un~ ~ D-3 STOP N~ n D-3 R1-1 30"x30 w J~O } l1 =r', . { a% ~ ~~a r. J r:~ ~ ~ f`''~ rr,.v....- 1 ~ ~immem moans V :a- i P t- ~ti; f ..r r , tt~ t t ~ ~...r, 'f .ti t s r . i. S f S s .nra < > 3 f_ i f• d } .'i, ~"C 3 i i ; ~S K ~ aw+ ~ F- t 7 S i i 2 ~ ~ d t L !t. '~f ~eeas i+ t ;~ti~'• ti ' .y. r V v,,~` LTA: ! , rr. rn.. yf _ i I ~ ~ .~....7•r.•.•r,.~;.~AV ~ 1- rf,~;....;i.: _ 1 .t ~:4 M ~ fig. i• • ♦ ~ fl r`"' ,Ca. t"' i I ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ V ~ ~ ~ ■ C r ~ 1 f _ ~ ~ e-~ y~ e-- ...f v r ~ 1 ~ i Ei.. 4. J C3 CI ~ ~ f~~ 1 / s../ t~ ~-C'~ .i ' -i } ~ / ~ N N . ~•t C tvy t V N~ N E ~N 1 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ /4 aA ~ i T 1 i 7 i. v vt0~ f 40 / t-- -M III~ Y COJCL C) -4 Cl C) CV N -4 5 Q O C3 e C3 ~..WLL ZW W 3, 1L h Ir LL Ca C) x 0 SHEET 11 OF 14 JJ SKYLINE ESTATES ~Vt1~E 1 ~r°ti7~~~~i iV~f1~H _ 54THAVE z f ~ ~ ~ TREE PLANTING LIST 2 4 3 l SYM. COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE & COND 5 i , DEGIOUOUS GANOPY TREES ~ ~y KC KENTUCKY COFFEETREE GYMNOCLADUS DIOICA 2" CAL. B&B ~ S 7 SA SUMMITASH FRAXINUS PENNSYLVANICA'SUMMIT 2" CAL. B&B 3 Ol 8 1~ 6 BQ BURR OAK QUERCUS MACROCARPA 2" CAL. B&B r. ® ~ _ - - - 4 13 WHB WESTERN HACKBERRY CELTIS OCCIDENTALIS 3" CAL. B&B 9 7 ~ 12 NRO NORTHERN RED OAK QUERCUS RUBRA 2" CAL. B&B PA PATMORE ASH FRAXINUS PENNSYLVANICA'PATMORE' 2" CAL. B&B 10 $ APA AUTUMN PURPLE ASH FRAXINUS AMERICANA'AUTUMN PURPLE' 2" CAL. B&B s aa~~ r 6 tt 9 11 EVERGREEN TREES 7 ~p 1~ AP AUSTRIAN PINE PINUS NIGRA HT. 6-8' , 8&B, (SP CS COLORADO SPRUCE PICEA PUNGENS HT. 6-B' , B&B, (SP RMJ ROCKY Mt?UNTAIN JUNIPER JUNIPERUS SCOPULORUM HT. 6-8' , B&B, (SP ORNAMENTAL TREE $ ~ 1i r- ~----""rte`` f ~ ~ i2 i AM AMUR MAPLE ACER GINNAIA 8' CLUMP, B&B CRC CANADA RED CHOKECHERRY PRUNUS VIRGINIANA'SHUBERT 2" CAI. B&B ' f✓~. TH T(}BA HAWTHt?RN CRATAEGUS'PAUL'S SOARLET 2" CAL. B&B 4 4 ,.v.- TCH THORNLESS COCKSPUR HAWTHORN CRATAEGUS CRUS-GALLI INERMIS 2" CAL. B&B RC RAQIENT CRABAPPLE MALUS'RADIANT 2" CAL. B&B SSC SPRING SNOW CRABAPPLE MALUS'SPRING SNOW 2" CAI. B&B L~.. SBS SHADBLOW SERVICEBERRY AMELANCHIER CANADENSIS 8' CLUMP a ~ N L ~ • ~ I~I\~ a _ _ ~ r~rrnri . _ _ . f A SHRUB PLANTING LIST EVERGREEN SHRUBS r CCJ CALGARY CARPET JUNIPER JUNIPERUS SABINA'CALGARY CARPET 5~-~~~ i BMJ BROADMOORJUNIPER JUNIPERUSSABINA'BROADMOOR' S~-~~~ TJ TAM JUNIPER JUNIPERUS SABINA TAMARISCIFOIiA' S~~~~ i MP MUGO PINE PINUS MUGO scn~.ooNr. TTJ TABLE TOP BLUE JUNIPER JUNIPERUS BCOPULORUM ?ALBLE TOP BLUE e cu. oorir. i DECIDUOUS SHRUBS f ACC AMERICAN COMPACT CRANBERRY VIBURNUM TRILOBUM'COMPACTUM' 2a ~~CANE YIIN. APP APACHE PLUME FALLUGIA PARADOXA s~..~M 20" HTf3 CANE II~N. I 4 AWS ANTHONY WATERER SPIREA SPIRAEA BUMALDA'ANTHOMI WATERER' S~~ ~ 20" HTt3 CANE MIN. J i AC ALPINE CURRANT RISES ALPINUM r ,E41N. BB BEAUTY BUSH KOLKWITZIAAMABILIS ~E~ BMS BLUE MIST SPIREA CARYOPTERiS X CLANDENENSIS ~~"~r~a~,EwN. 1 DKL DWARF KOREAN LILAC SYRINGA MEYERI 5~~~~~ i 1Yy 5~~~ ENN. FB FERNBUSH CHAMAEBATIARIAMILLEFOLIUM aa'HTI4CANEYAN. ri i.. GDP GOLD DROP P~TENTILLA POTENTILLA'GOLD DROP S~~~~~ 30" HTJ4 CANE MIN. MM MOUNTAIN MAHOGANY CERCOCARPUS MONTANUS 5~~ '►!i PL COMMON PURPLE LILAC SYRINGA VULGARIS scai E"~". RS RUSSIAN SAGE PEROVSKIAATRIPLICIFILIA S~T~~~ EMIN. s 30" HTl4 CANE MIN. RB RABBITBRUSH, TALL GREEN CHRYSOTHAMUS NAUSEQSUS GRAVEOLENS 3a~i~°°~xna SY SOAPWEED YUCCA YUCCA GLAUCA sc~u..co~r. 30" HT14 CJWE MIN. SLB SILVERBERRY ELAEAGNUSCOMMUTATA 5~•~M~ 30" NT/4 CANE ANN. l Y y~ t , SB SEA BUCKTHORN HIPPOPHAE RHAMN~IDES za~~ Hfl4 CANE NIN 5 GAL. mNT z SMS SMOOTH SUMAC RHUS GLABRA ia~~ MIN, SPREAD 5 GAL. CONT. ~ ~.v i ~v. 10. THE CONTRACTOR IS EXPECTED TO BE FAMILIAR WITH AND IRRIGATION PLANS AND SPECIFIGATIONS AS CL05 11. D0 NOT DISTURB THE EXISTING PAVING, LIGHTING, LAN EXISTING ADJACENT TO THE SITE UNLESS NOTED ON T 12. ALL TREE PITS IN SAD QR NATIVE AREAS ARE TO RECEI MULCH. NQ WEED CONTROL FABRIC 0R EDGER IS REQ 13. REFER TO THE ENGINEERS PIANS FOR GRADING, SIDE 1 SS SASKATOON SERVICEBERRY AMELANCHIER ALNIFOLIA za~~ MIN. SPREAD 5 GAI.OONT. 1. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FQR FENCE AND COLUMN LOCATIONS. ~ 2. BRICK GOLOR AND MORTAR TO MATCH COLUMNS IN FILING N0.1 GUR GOLDEN UNICORN SHRUB ROSE ROSA'GOLDEN INICORM ao~'HT/4 CANE MIN. 5 GAL. CONT. MIN. 3. PAINT WOOD FENCE TO MATCH FILING N0. 1. _ SC SPREADING C~TONEASTER COTONEASTER DIVARICATUS 5~ ~~M EMIN. MIN. TLS THREE LEAF SUMAC RHUS TRILOBATA 5~ J4~M E MIN. MIN. MIN. WT WAYFARING TREE VIBURNUM LANTANA 5GAL ~~M EMIN. WSC WESTERN SAND CHERRY PRUNUS BESSEYI scni'~~r.E"~". CM CURLLEAF MOUNTAIN MAHQGANY CERGOCARPUS LEDIFODUS 5GN..,COMT.EMIN. ~N. 3 RAIL FEN~E- MIN. ~ ' CW COYOTE WILLOW SALIX EXIGUA 3o"HT/4 CANE MIN. MIN. N . T. S . HOMEOWNERS 4` tE1N CROSS PERENNIAL PLANTING LIST 10' O.C. iYP. 3' 3 r GROUND COVERS, VINES, GRASSES & PERENNIAL FLOWERS til. DDC DWARF DOUBLE COREOPSIS COREOPSIS GRANDIFLORA'SUNRAY' 1 GAL. CONT. VT. 2x6" ROUGH SAWN CEDAR RAILS C R BBF BURGUNDY BLANKET GAILLARDIAX GRANDIFLORA'BURGUNDI" 1 GAL. CANT. VT. ATTACHED WITH A MIN. TWA WOOD FLOWER SCREWS PER RAIL PER PQ.4T H VL s CPH CREEPING PHLOX PHLOX SUBULATA (WHITE, PURPLE) 1 GAL. CONT. RD RED DAYLILLY HEMEROCALLIS SP. 1 GAL. CONT. SI SIBERIAN IRIS IRIS SIBERICA 1 GAL. CONT. VT. ~ SLOPE AND TROWEL SMOOTH DL 'STELLA D'ORO DAYULLY HEMEROCALLIS 1 GAL. CONT. A ASTER ASTER X FRIKARTiI 1 GAL. CONT. BES BLACK EYED SUSAN RUDBECKIA FULGIDA 1 GAL. GOVT. BF BLANKET FLOWER GALLARDIAX GRANDIFLORA'BURGUNDY' 1 GAL. CONT. CPP CREEPING PHLOX PHLOX SUBULATA'PINIC 1 GAL. CONT. e. SBP SCARLET BUGLER PENSTEMON PENSTEMON BARBATUS 1 GAL. CONT. : SF SULPHUR FLOWER ERIOGONUM UMBEILATUM 1 GAL. CONT. PCF PRAIRIE CONE FLOWER RATIBIDA CQLUMNIFLOF3A YELLOW 1 GAL. CONT. t YSR YELLOW SUN ROSE HELIANTHEMUM'SUNFLECK' 1 GAL. CONT. t, CY COMMON WHITE YARROW AC!-IILLEA MILLEFOLIUM 1 GAL. CONT. NBB NATNE BEE BALM MONARDA FISTULOSA 1 GAL. CONT. BAG BLUE AVENAGRASS HELICTOTRICHON SEMPERVIRENS 1 GAL. CONT. BFG BLUE FESCUE GRASS FESTUCA GLAUCA'ELUAH BLUE' 1 GAL. CONT. FRG FEATHER REED GRASS CALAMAGROSTIS ARUNDINACEA 1-GAL. CONT. 14. ALL PERENNIAL, ANNUAL, AND GRQUNDCOVER PIANTiN CROSS SECTION USING TRIANGULAR SPACING. UNLESS SHOWN A51RRE PLANTINGS BY SPECIES ARE TO BE EQUALLY SPACED U 3°CtwMFeR ON THE PLAN. LEGEND ~~RL FOERSTER' t 6• 15. TREE LOCATIONS TAKE PRIORITY OVER IRRICATtON LIN 6" TO MOVE IRRIGATION LINES IF THEY INTERFERE WffH TI 16. ALL TREE TO BE OF SPECIMEN QUALITY. CONTRACTOR WITH OWNER REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO DELNERY ON i, l~ -.iy' i AREA TO REMAI o DECIDUOUS TREE - DURING THE DE OF THE SITE HGT. 6~ 1~ 48 17. CONTRACTOR SHALL SEED ALL NON SODDED OR BED A 6~ WITH NATIVE SEED MIX UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED QN ~b^ 18. LANDSCAPE IMPRpVEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS KLAN SHA SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL TR N.T.S. N.T. r~, f x fY I IRRIGATED NATI • ORNAMENTAL TREE GRASS SEED 4 rii r PERENNIALS AN GROUND COVE DECIDU(3US SHRUB -i i i 90/10 FESCUE L~ BLUE GRASS S + EVERGREEN TREE NON-IRRIGATED DAMAGED N+t~O~ DETAIL PR`~~" • L ~ AFTERTO P1/WTiNG. sEr sue r wcr~ THAN T}-E FINNED ~D GRADE i GRASS SEED ,.,~,~j EVERGREEN SHRUB. W Y W 2x4° CEDAR RALS ON BACK - as PuiNr air 4-8" DIA. MOUNT MATCH C4L4R F ~;,~~;~~~-v~` ORNAMFNTAI GRASSF~ AS WOE & HIC-1i AS OF FENCE (TOP, MIDDLE & BOTTO~A r~ ca~r~wER 1 APPLY SpECFEO tv~CH. q-n n n ac rrhrwlM UKt51LO VVHEATGRASS 30 Planning METER FENCE AND COLUMNS ►F FENCING IS NOT SHOWN ON PLAN INDIVDUAL SIGNLE FAMILY LOT OWNERS DWARF PERENNIAL RYEGRASS 3 RAIL FENCE - ~ ~ ~ 6'HT. PERIMETE (SEE DETAIL THIN( L THIS SHEET) MAY INSTALL THIS STYLE OF FENCING ALONG SIDE AND REAR PROPERTY LINES. 25 Landscape Architecture (SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET) WOOD PRIVACY (ACY FFNroF SR3200 BLUE FESCUE REUBENS CANADA BLUEGRASS 20 710 West Colfax Avenue 15 Denver, Colorado 80204 m m (SEE DETAIL THK CHEWINGS FESCUE Fax: 303.892.1186 "N" TRANSITIONAL Fl 10 Phone: 303.892.1166 ~ ~t~ www.norrisdullea.com c5l U ° (SEE DETAIL THI D UVV H O m Z ~ j g m,= 1 SHEET 12 OF 14 C) Cl :ESTATES FILING NO. 3 FDP f ~~Y SAP a~ALE 1'~=3~'-Q" N~RTN - 54TH AVE 1 Z ~ 3 2 4 5 i B u 2 ~ ~..r .rr~ r rrrr~ rr~~t il~r. Ate. ` ~ 7 3 8 ~ ~ a 13 9 5 ~2 B ~4 ® 2i 9 ti 0 20' 40' 84' f 7 tt7 10 J 1 11 8 9 11 1 ~f NORTH SCALE 1 "=40'-0" l~ ~ j .~.r.1 s.r. ~ P I ~ T EXISTING SKYLINE ESTATES F 5Q.00' R.O.W. EXISTI FINAL DEVELOPME 30.O R.O. r . ~ THAN DTI N i AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CI A PART OF THE SW 1 /4 OF THE NE 1 / TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON ~ 1 FREE F~~I~ N 3 D 1- 1 1 i _ h'.' P LANDSCAPE PLA i i y~ r ',,F T~1 30.0' EXISTING ~3'SSC,' -T~-S.`; ~ 1-~t ~~JATER EASEMENT ~ -SS%:::=-:,:. ~ ~-G t ; ~RIC~C COLUMN- ~B PTO BE PARTLALLY j 2 ARAf~1~nN~~l e I r r nr r,~ r.iT ~ 1 i" (REC. N0. F1200?29) t ~ t ~ ~ ; . . .e.~_...- ,J. .J. .J.. J_ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ■ ~ P ii ~ r ~ ~ , ~ r r _1.. t ~ P'E IM T E . r~ . . r.+ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ t ~ r ' ~ r • , r I t i~ u ' j / - r ~i i r , ~ ~ ~ ' r r M ~r ~ , ~ t r t ~ t r W . i r r r..~ t r r r t t r ~ r r ' ~ ® ~ . t ~ ~ ~ t W W t r - ~ ~ EXISTING ' t t r ~ t t s r r r r t r , 1 , r r, r i ~ y r i t r t t i t' t ...........n-,... t t 1~ . ~ t t ~ ~ ' t r t t ' ~ i ~ _ J. 1 t BARBED VG~1RE ~ ~ t t ~ , ~ r ~ ~ ~ t . ~ i r ' . s ' ' .t o ~ r ~ i e ' t t t r , r ~ ~ ' °r i ' r r + r r ~ FENCE ' i r ~ .J. r . ~''"M..+.+n~ ' r r ~ r . N ITI NAL, FEN . r E . , ~ ~ 1 ~ I ~ .t`.. ~ t , r t ~ ~ , ' t t . . ~ ' 1 W t ' `7 ~ ~ ~ L. r r i _ ~ ~ > , mr a,.. ~ , • i. ~ A ~ ~ - t t ~ ' i E . r ~ ~ ~ l a... r ~ ~ ~ ' ~r "I ' e ~~hfy~~'~s}~` W44D PRIVACY FENCING ,i BY HOMEOWNER - t~ ~ i 0 l ' ~ ~ t s . a .i.; 1~ <; EXISTING CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE ___J,i;_ ~rs• ~~C~1lS TRF~ I ESE CTRICD BOUNDARY LINE 1 i PROPOSED _ ~ SI~Y~INE ESTATES I ~I~ING 2 J d i r s t t - 4" EXISTING IRRIGATION CITY L ~ A R A D ~II';E (ABANDONED) V I f 7 r 5 i i~ 30.00' =ir r= EXISTING WATER EASEMENT J (TO BE PARTIALLY ABANDONED) i (REC. N0. F1200729) LI t j t J I I' ! II I! A h(AI I. F F N [;i- I t 1' I11 'r' 1 111; 1 1 )Y AU ~~IUUL I UHA IRRIGATION NOTE: LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS uwusc~w ~W I TY OF WHEAT RID INDIVIDUAL SINGLE FAMILY LOT BEHNDWNG FENCE 1-tANDSCAPE IMPROVtlrl~ Landscape Architecture BY DEVELOPER 710 West Colfax Avenue j BYDEVEL - F Y 1. J IRRIGATION IS OFFERED AS AN OPTION. ATTACH ATTACHED SIDEW~LK---./ Denver, Colorado 80244 Fax: 303.892.1186 mm CD M Phone: 303.892.1166 #tM 1~ ■I ■ lII1M1F~ 1 e j ~ IM1Ylas r/ www.norrisdullea.com C YN~1 IY~~ r ~ < t MIMK ~IIAi C.~ CV Cd CW) Cl C) SHEET 13 OF 14 Z tom. CF) V- Cn CN i a- M CO CF) ~ i SKYLINE E . ESTATES FILING NO, 3 FDP KEY MAP SCALE 1"=300'-0" NORTH f ~q~ ~ TH AVE ~ _ f III OFF 13 it I~ I I~ - ~ III '1;~1 ~i ~ I~ -~1 ~ t t 1 r-'IIII I, ~i 'i - ca 1~i i I- I_ ~ _i .ate~I,,' i 1 I '1 a f P ~ J 1 °P-°~"~ i 7 t I ~ . P 1 1 3 e / / t s 1 ' r j i a ~ J 1 i 1 J ~ i r P J P ~ / , ~ , j d 1. 7 1 ~ P 0 1 i 1~ k / r / r • I / r / •YP. . P / r ! P 1 P P r r r j P t tF r ,r, , P 1 r . J ~ j ° ~ P F . / r ! P 3 ~ ~ ! ! 1 } j ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ / / Y, . i. c ~ ~ ~ P J { ? J I / ~ ~ J { / / . r J 1 1 r ~ fl . 4 t s s LEGEND i ~ ti ' J ; { J.. e... .d d r ,J r ,J I 'J ~ I I 1 S, t S I r r J 'i. r . t ~ 7i I - ~ ~ PERIMETER FENCE i r ~ ~ r ~ r i i ~ i i J 1 ' 1 ~ e J s ~ i x i i / .........................r:rrrria..~rrr.....rr...~...,.rr, ~ J ; I s r a J, i J . / s 1 1 J~ l ~ BRICK COLUMN J ~ % . r ~ ; ; ~ . J 'r / ~ f ~ ! ~ r. J ~ r 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ . -'y , 4 r r 7 ~ I r ~ ~ I r ..I..k. f ~ ~ r / 1 TRANSITIONAL FENCE 17 . y r I r / { ~ ~ ~ . 7 r s r x J J ,t ? - THREE RAIL FENCE ,J i r . ~ i I i J ~ ~ j; j ~ { I J / + ~ . ,I r I ~ ~ f r T! ! f J f / ~ 9 Jr( ~ i r r . i ■ WOOD PRIVACY FENCE r Y ~ ~ P 1 I. rrraravaarvraaaraarlflffflffffflffr✓✓rfr✓✓r✓rxrrrrr✓r✓r~ J ' 1 YP i I l / ~ I J ~ r' r > e % ~ e ~ t r, , r i .J..;. i r ~ i r J e ~ t : . . ~i..i~ a DECIDUOUS TREE [ ~ i a i ~ r~ r ~i i ; J 1 1 r r . 1 J r J r 'i f J ~ \ v r 1 ~ / J j i r ~ ~7 .r ~ I 'J ! i 1 ; I j ' i i n i ~ r y r r ~ ~ ~ r r . ~ i i i 1. V ~.1 I V C... i ~ i 'r jyt E/y 1! r ! ~r+. J ~ r I~1I1id r! ~ ! r.r^rr^. i J °:TRANSITI~}NEN~E ~"i i 'r ~ i ~ r -rJr,1~.,.ar~.rayw;.r.jwiww~rw.a,r.CJ r J ! ~ ! ~ ! ' ! . ' ' , / ~ . r.«.~ .J. .r.~r.J.J. J. +rr r Jr i i ; is }J r r i w r ~w r.. rrrrwwrvrwwvrrvr v!✓✓/✓✓.. •'J. . rr r.r rr rrs rsa or rrYd wvr>+J ° « r.rrw.«.+r. . ..rr ~3~.NA~ NTA~ TAE ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 ! i ! • ~ 1 i i r i r ~ q vrr~f.J.✓rrr.irr ~rl. ~7.J>: .:J , ! ! :s oe j .r..w.., rxr✓rrrrrrrrrr ..+r r. r,.,r j,.~ rwrrrrrrrrrr.rrr ~rr.~rrrr.+. rr r ! ' r r ! 1 ! J ~,r ! r; r , l r 1 j i. I ~ i s.. ~ ' a • i . a: ~ ' s r ~ , ~.,r. 1r r. i.. ,~..rlrr. • 1 d ! r r vr• r I r i d ..rlryrl...r~~...r..J. .~1w.~..l. r 1 J ~ J / i J ~ ' rl>t i 1 ~ J f ~ .Jr f..~...l ,.1, j,,,. y,.1,.,..r.l ..r.rrr i. . . ~ . . i a rr~fJ rrr firrJr....'rw~.r..ir.,•~rrirrerr i J ~ J i r i )i d rw«J Jlywr>rr! rr«..J ....:....r,r,, rl.,• ' r~ r ~ ~ ar, r ~ i I I ~ rr r ~l1w.l,.J..r.: t.r.J...r., i:. .j...r.y ~~I l~U SHRUB ....r ' ~ r~ .:ly,l..,.:1.r.....~..,. ~..~..;,.J .r~.i ~ ! ! . ! r f; r ~ rrdyrrrrry✓rrr✓yr:ry'rrr✓rrr1sw,rrrrrw r• ! ~ ~ r i J » r r % ..Jw ~%rwrr.w.lr.yawJ.. w. ~,.f ~,~r' r ~ rr ~ ~ y'' 1 i .yr~...r rr..~,~,..r.. :rr.~..r.rr ' 1 rr+'' •rrr> ~ .ryr~r irrTr s~ rirrrr.r ~.~r'' . . .i I ✓ J J ~i ! r i J t° r°rr r i ~r / ! ` ! ! i : : ! r.r J 1 J' ~ :y.t...~ri.ri ~,.f. rir i...~.. J.Jr ~ E~` RN j t 1 ! J ~ ~ i i i ~ y rr r°r ✓✓✓r ,r .r.. ....rr...sr.r.rr✓.✓✓.r. rrrs.r / .idwld...w~.i..ri'Yx`,....rl..i..i.,..j..J.Jr . , h ~ . . . . . . r f r d' i"wS 7 r f ~ ~ r~ rlrrrrrryrrir✓rrirJ~ryrr~.~ryr.. ~ r.. ....~~.f+. . .'i. ys.f~... . rJr«,.`,w.~ i,r.lr.,l,..~..~,.r~rri.yl.,a ~ d t r r t ~ f ~ ~ .yJw~ rrr+✓Jr,~ ~+lr rr/rrr✓r err ~r~ ~,,...>r,,. wrrrrrrrwwrrrr>, .,.✓.r.,✓..,. .....r,,....,.. .wr...w.... i ~ Sr.,.Jrw.rwSw.~ ' + wy~r .~..,r....,rwr..J. ! ' d l t .r .~„vd . ~ . ..,,r.'.. . A { ! t ~ ~ ~~rdrrrr~r~rwr ~r✓s ~rryrvrrr ~rJryrr ~r J ' 1' .~rwr+> ~ JYww~wrryrav., ~.rjr..i,rl.r:J d ! t. r r r i tr•~ r .,J✓e, i. 7J.~ :iJ..rJ..fr>.r. EVE~{~REEN HRI~ i y ~,~w~... . . -,y r r.,rr~.✓.r✓r rrr . htrrrr ,J•°, ~ , • , , ~y,r .1 r.,J ✓J. .,rr,rJ.. ,J.r+. ~ j r~ r r! .r, i ~ i J ' 1:rr ~~lrN✓~r..✓1fr✓>J+'✓.~✓!rr✓.r✓r'✓s✓~✓y.J 4rf~y1'ti'Y~}~~. ~.Y ~1i r~,,..r r• Y r I ~ 'r.,:.✓.: J.. r%. fir J, r. .j..°J.,. ' ~ Y ~ JSrrl rJr r! i r r i rrrirrJrJrr ~rrar r~ rrr 1 ~ _ ! y..J..,.~J ✓J r,l,✓.,lir~rrrr.~.,i...~.~ ~I~c~~~'~~i1\: ry~f~rJ a ~ it N'.+'' i~ t ~ ! r r , i , ~ ~1 ~yvr✓rr fJwr,/,v+ryvrrNrrrrrorwr✓J.1 d ! r r F, 7 1 rl7wrrr+ri«wJrfr~wy.r.°.r ~r✓rw.yrr f~,~.r fide ~ ~~!.V~ 1 =J ® ~ 1' ~ I i / d e« E 1 1 .r~✓...rJ.rJ,~.,arrr✓.J,,,,,.J r * + fi + + + IRR~A,TE~ NAT~V lr~~ ; r,r~ i i ~~i - ~ r'j~J ! -r Ir DER NN~~. ~ rr ~ ~ ~ ~f' / r~ i y ~ ]r j~_ _ i t f,,,,,,,,.,., r ~i'~} I ~ r r 1 r r ! ~ t ~ ~ . A i u~ . . t 1` A t ~7 F I 1; y 1 ` 1 ~ A U , X ~ 1 R' . -I . F i ~ f . 7 1 i ~ ; ~ ! I rL r_ ~ i ~ r ' r 1 I I t~ 3_ i . ~ ~ , - - i ~ 1 r~ r ~ • i . I ~ z "i ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ . . r_ .~,L i JJ 4 r . ' . , ~ ` t . i ~u ~ , I 1 . f i f , r , i ~ ~ ~ e L~ I y . r• . i ~ , i; i, r, ~ ~ 1 i i c i r ~ r r . 1. is f a~ T Li -r ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~J a ~jJ A YY . i ~ 1 f l i ~ t r' v ~ 1 ' ~ t_- ' J y . r ~ _ rr.d . ''iii ~#r~ i r ' ad'r err, + i• + t + + + i + + ' rrJyrrrrr. r•r'y//rJ,rr Landscape Architecture aJr W W ~ W ~f f°JYY ry } { + 4 + 60.00 vPR~face oDnonecn Al nKlr~► omr-c ennn %nnruIKI t + + + + r + { J+rrJ { W. aooo~ : r.rJ. ye + t+'t}t + 4 + i f t W rYJr*" yyr y. DECIDUOUS TREES I r+++t+++ ++9+++ ` g 710 West Colfax Avenue + } + + + + + t + + + + + t t + a ~ $ Denver, Colorado 80204 + + + + + + + + + + + ,,f.a aJJr rJJ/ y. ♦ '0~' fJ YJJ/ Jr y,rY FUTURE THE TREE LAWN SH/ + 'a ,y yJ rY. ,r t rJ Fax: 303.892.1186 r+wM + + i + + + + r~rr r~r + + + + + + + + + + + EOP-EO P S) a r. (BY OTHI rwJ/ ~ Phone: 303.$92.1166 ~ CO cn .rJ www.nor~sdullea.com aJ .s \j +J raw rrrar yJ ✓'raJr ✓ J / rJ In SHEET 14 OF 14 c~rn. Jas. M/ m W ~ I✓. ✓r rarr.r✓r✓ r'r'rlr ryJ rr,ryr Y 1 e. r C3? CV Q C' r r tt? C,n LINE ESTATES FILING NO, 3 FDP INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER Council Bill No. _ Ordinance No. _ Series of 2003 TITLE: AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE FROM AGRICULTURAL-ONE TO PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 10285 RIDGE ROAD, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO,THAT: Section 1. Upon application by Melody Homes, Inc, approval of a zone change in Wheat Ridge, Colorado, Case No. WZ-02-13, and based on recommendation of approval from the Wheat Ridge Planning Commission and pursuant to findings made based on testimony and evidence presented at a public hearing before the Wheat Ridge City Council, Wheat Ridge maps are hereby amended to exclude from the Agricultural-One District and to include in the Planned Residential Development District and the Planned Industrial Development District the following described land: ALL THAT PART OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO, LYING NORTH OF THE COUNTY ROAD KNOWN AS RIDGE ROAD, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ' COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 16, THENCE NORTH 00° 13'11" WEST, ON AND ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4, A DISTANCE OF 71.25 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF RIDGE ROAD, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 00°13'11" WEST ON AND ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST ''/a, A DISTANCE OF 1246.20 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4; THENCE NORTH 89°35'34" EAST, ON AND ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, A DISTANCE OF 665.06 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4; THENCE SOUTH 00°12'59" EAST, ON AND ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, A DISTANCE OF 1068.47 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID RIDGE ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 74°38'30" WEST, ON AND ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 688.90 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ATTACHMENT 2 Section 2. Vested Property Rights. Approval of this zone change does not create a vested property right. Vested property rights may only arise and accrue pursuant to the provisions of Section 26-121 of the Code of Laws of the City of Wheat Ridge. Section 3. Safety Clause. The City Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is promulgated under the general police power of the City of Wheat Ridge, that it is promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare of the public and that this ordinance is necessary for the preservation of health and safety and for the protection of public convenience and welfare. The City Council further determines that the ordinance bears a rational relation to the proper legislative object sought to be attained. Section 4. Severability. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, or part of this Zoning Code or the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall for any reason be adjusted by a court of competent jurisdiction invalid, such judgment shall not affect application to other persons or circumstances. Section 5. Supersession Clause. If any provision, requirement or standard established by this Ordinance is found to conflict with similar provisions, requirements or standards found elsewhere in the Code of Laws of the City of Wheat Ridge, which are in existence as of the date of adoption of this Ordinance, the provisions, requirements and standards herein shall supersede and prevail. Section 6. This ordinance shall take effect 15 days after final publication. INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first reading by a vote of _ to on this _ day of , 2003, ordered published in full in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Wheat Ridge and Public Hearing and consideration on final passage set for , 2003, at 7:00 o'clock p.m., in the Council Chambers, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final reading by a vote of to , this day of 2003 SIGNED by the Mayor on this day of 2003 GRETCHEN CERVENY, MAYOR ATTEST: Wanda Sang, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM BY CITY ATTORNEY GERALD DAHL, CITY ATTORNEY 1st Publication: 2nd Publication: Wheat Ridge Transcript Effective Date: LEGAL DESCRIPTION' ALL THAT PART OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 16. TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE fig WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN. OTY OF WHEAT RIDGE. COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. LYING NORTH OF THE COUNTY ROARS KNOWN AS RIDGE ROAD, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS MILD W COMMENCING AT WE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF BAD SECTION 16. THENCE NORTH 0013' 11' WEST, ON AND ALONG THE WEST UNE OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4, A INSTANCE OF 11.25 FEET TO A PONT ON WE NORTHERLY MONT OF WAY LINE OF RIDGE ROAD. SAID POINT ALSO BEING WE TRUE PONT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 0013' 11' WEST ON AND ALONG THE NEST UNE OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4, A DISTANCE OF 1246.20 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF WE NORTHEAST 1/4; THENCE NORTH 89'35' 34' EAST, ON AND ALONG THE NORTH UNE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, A DISTANCE OF 665.06 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID WEST 1/2 OF THE SORNMST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4; THENCE SOUTH W12' 59' EAST, ON AND ALONG THE EAST UNE OF SAID WEST 1/2 OF WE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, A DISTANCE OF 1068,41 FEET TO A PUNT W THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY UNE OF SAID RIDGE ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 74'38'3D' WEST, ON AND ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY UNE, A DISTANCE OF 6M.90 FEET MORE OR LESS TO WE PONT OF BECHNING CONTAINING 769,656 SQUARE FEET (17.67 ACRES) MORE OR LESS. BASIS OF BEARING BEARINGS ME BASED ON WE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 89 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AS BEARING NORM 0013'11' WEST. WE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST X OF SAID SECTION 16 IS MONUMENTED BY A 3-Y4' BRASS CAP STAMPED 'QTY OF WHEAT RIDGE LS 13212' AND THE NORTHWEST CORNER O THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST Y4 OF SAID SECTON 16 IS MONUMENTED BY A 2- ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED:'PUS 19X3'. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICA 1, GEORGE G. SAW. ,OUR., A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF LULDRADO. DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY FOR SKVUNE ESTATES HUNG NO. 3 WAS MADE UNDER MY SUPERNSIW AND WE ACCOMPANTTNG PLAN ACCURATELY AND PROPERLY SHOWS SAID SURVEY. GEORGE G. SMITH, JR. DAIS P.LS NO. 190M TRACT D I NATION TAB TRACT AREA USE OWNER/ MAINTENANCE A 118,889 N. ft/2.72 cc. O'ER SPACE, DRAINAGE, HOA' IRRIGATOR B 3040 sq. R/001 Ac. WEN SPACE MOM C 9289 sR ft./D.21 ac. OPEN SPACE HOA' D 2,100 cq. ft./O.06 ac OPEN SPACE, IRRIGATION HOA' E 8550 aq. H./0.20 9c. OPEN SPACE HOA' F 9691 s9. N-/022 qe WEN WAGE HOA' G 23.969 WIT. ft./O55 ac WEN SPACE, IRRIGATION NOA- H 34,003 IDP, ft/0.78 oC. OPEN SPACE, DRAINAGE HOA' - TUN[ L51AIE5, OR OTHER, HOMEOWNERS ASSOCMTON AS DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AND MASTER DECLARANT SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 3 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PROJECT SITE A PART OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO COVER RESIDENTIAL STANDARDS 1. HOMES IN WE SKYLINE 3 COMMUNITY SHALL BE CONSISTENT WIN THE ELEVATIONS INCLUDED ON THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. OVERAL FACADE AND ARCHITECTURE SHALL CONFORM TO THE PLANS INCLUDED IN THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. 2 RESDENTAL STRUCTURES ON LOTS ADJACENT TO OPEN SPACE TRACTS SHALL INCLUDE, ON WE SIDE ADJACENT TO WE TRACT, THE SAME ENHANCEMENTS REWIRED FOR STRUCTURES ON CORNER LOTS 3. RESTDENTAL STRUCTURES ON CORNER LOTS SHALL HAVE ALONG WE SIDE OF THE HOME A FOUR FOOT RETURN OF DECORATIVE WAINSCOTING TREATMENT OF EITHER BRICK OR STONE. TWO WINDOWS, TRIM BOARD ENHANCEMENTS, VARIATION IN SIDING MATERIAL, AND ALL M9SLE SIDE YARDS SHALL HAVE PRIVACY FENCE TO HELP SCREEN AND BRIM UP THE SIDE PLANE OF THE HOME. OVERALL FACADE AND ARCHITECTURE STALL CONFORM TO THE PLANS INCLUDED IN THIS DOCUMENT. 4. THE FRONT SETBACK SHALL VARY A MINIMUM OF 2.5 FEET SO NAT NO MORE THAN ONE-THIRD OF ANY STREET FRONTAGE SHALL HAYS HOMES WITH SETBACKS OF 20 FEET, 22.5 FEET, AND 25 FEET. NO THREE ADJACENT STRUCTURES SHALL HAVE THE SAME FRONT SETBACN. 5, NO TWO S'oGURR STRUCTURES SHl BE OTNSRi UCTED WIN THE SAME ELEVATOR ON ADJACENT LOTS OR LOTS ACROSS THE STREET. THERE SHALL NOT BE TWO GARAGE DOMINANT MODELS CONSTRUCTED ON ADJACENT LOTS 6. ARGHIT:CTURPI. FEATURES SUCH AS CORNICES, EAVE BELTCOURSES BAY WINDOWS. 9US. CANOPIES. PORCHES, DECKS, PATIOS, AND BALCONIES MAY EXTEND OR PROJECT INTO A REWIRED SETBACK A MAXIMUM OF THIRTY INCHES. 7. THE FIRST FLOOR OF THE FRONT ELEVATION W THE HOME SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF BOX BRICK OR STONE WIN A FOUR-FOOT RETURN ON EINER SIDE OF THE ROME OF DECORATVE WAINSCOTING. INDUSTRIAL STANDARDS: 1. BUFFERING OF INDUSTRIAL AREAS: WHENEVER A PARKING LOT IS PLACED BETWEEN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-CF-WAY AND WE STRUCTURE(S), A SCREENING OF WE PARKING AREA SHALL BE ESTABLISHED BETWEEN THE RIGHT-CF-WAY AND THE PARKING AREA THIS NEW-OBSCURING SCREEN SHALL BE COMPOSED OF UVE PLANTINGS, BERMS, FENCES, WALLS, OR A COABINATON THEREOF, WE HEIGHT OF THE SCREENING WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE SIGHT DISTANCE TRIANGLE REQUIREMENTS AS OUTLINED ON THE FINAL DEVTLOPMENT PLAN. 2 OUTDOOR STORAGE FOR THE INDUSTRIAL LOT: WMOOR STORAGE ASSOCIATED MIN WE PRIMARY LEE OF THE INDUSTRIAL LOT IS ALLOWED AS AN ACCESSORY USE WHEN EXPUCHLY IDENTIFIED ON AN APPROVED FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. THE MATERIALS TO BE SIGNED MUST BE SCREENED BY A SIX-FOOT. NEW-OBSCURING FENCE, WALL, OR LANDSCAPING WHICH FULLY CONCEALS SUCH FAGUTES FROM ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND PUBLIC STREETS. THE HEIGHT OF ANY STORAGE MATERIALS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE HEIGHT OF WE PENCE 3. ARCHITECTURAL FINISHES SHALL INCLUDE EXTERIOR MATERIALS OF BRICK. STONE WOW. AND GLASS BUILDING FACADE TREATMENT SHALL INCLUDE ELEMENTS THAT PROVIDE A HUMAN SCALE, CREATE TEXTURE AND RELIEF. AND INCORPORATE ARCHITECTURAL FENESTRATON AND ARTCULATIW. MEFW. BUILDINGS ARE PROHIBITED. 4. EVERY INDUSTRIAL USE STALL BE OPERATED IN ITS ENTIRETY WITHIN A CONPLETELY ENCLOSED BUILDING WITH THE EXCEPTION OF OUTDOOR STORAGE AREAS IDENTIFIED ON AN APPROVED FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. S INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT SHALL NEXT THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTOR 26-505. INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS W THE MEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS, CASE HISTORY: WZ-02-13 WS-02-01 PREPARED: 06/27/03 r.Vtsion.: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: MAXMUM LOTWVERAGE 40X BUILDING COVERAGE 40% BUILDING MVERAGE LANDSCAPING REFERTOSE"ON126WCOFTHE REFER70SECTON265FQCFTHE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS MINIMUM SETBACKS FROM 20 FEET 20 FEET SIDE 7.5 FEET 7,5 FEET REAR 10FEU 10 FEET 'TEf%MTOFFAWKHEE9NLLBE 'IFERKMIFC£FAWNJSEgWLLGE STgCf.BhDAANriNOF2 STA(Y$i®p M+A4f40FT 'FADWBJTRID.LUI®NGHf{F 'FAONfBIfTO ~IIA'T®f4GYf{F VWT.MAlpI5E24IX C£21 NAY. h@AfM5EIH4IXOFd+ LIGHTING REFERTOSECNON266IXi OFTHE REFERTOSECDON285000FTHE WHEAT RIDGE WOE OF LAWS WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS PARKING REFERTOSECTON28501OFWE REFERTOSECTION28501OFTHE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS WHEAT RIDGE WIDE OF LAWS ARCHITECTURE AS APPROVED ON THE FINAL AS APPROVED ON THE FINAL OEVELOPMENTPLAN DEVELOPMENTPLAN ACCESS SIGNAGE REFER TO ARTICLE VII OF WE REFER TO ARTICLE VII OF THE WHEAT RIDGE WOE OF LAWS WHEAT RIDGE WOE OF LAWS FENCINGANDSIGM REFER TOSEGTON 266030F THE REFERTOSE=N266O40FTHE OSTANOETRIANGLE WHEATRIDGECODEOFLAWS WHEAT RIDGE WDE OF LAM ACCESSORY BUILDINGS REFER TO SECTION 2H1204 OF THE REFER TO SECTION %204 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE COOP OF LAMS WHEAT RIDGE WOE OF LAWS 35 FEET; swGEFAIA.Y w.atw 36 FEET, sAGuAwY CABLING MAXIMUM HEIGHT 20 FEET, DETgp®GAR4CEIXRSH~ 20 FEET; DElAC19TGARTC£IXRSH=J MINIMUM LOTSRE 7919 SO. FT. 19W S0. FT MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 40.8 FT. AT FRONTAGE 40.0 FT. AT FRONTAGE GOOD FT AT SETBACK 650 FT. AT SETBACK BDTE 1, THE PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL IA NOT A PART OF THIS FINN. DEVELOPMENT PLAN. PRIX TO ANY DEVELOPMENT ON W INDUSTRIAL LOT. APPROMM FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WILL BE REQUIRED PURSUANT M SECTION 28-311 O THE MEAT EAT RIDGE CODE O LAM. 2 IT IS THE INTENT TO INCLUDE THIS RUNG W1T IN THE HOA FOR FILINGS 1 AND 2 ELOPMENT SCHEDULE THE PROJECT WILL HAVE TWO PHASES W BUILD OUT. THE FIRST PHASE WILL COMPRISE ALL RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND NECESSARY IMPROVEMENTS, WCLUDMRG PUBLIC INPROVEAIENIS W CURB, GUTTER. SIDEWALK. AND TREE LAWN. INCLUDING RIDGE ROAD. THE SECOND PHASE WILL INCLUDE ONLY THE INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY PROPER. ANTICIPATED TWO-YEAR BUILD OUT OF RESIDENTIAL PHASE WON FINAL OTT W WHEAT RIDGE APPROVAL PREPARED BY: KIRKHAM vvQ MICHAEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS m WU Pak Neel Ni, qW.A eWOSe mmm Nm NM2INR WI-9m ru roll soma PREPARED FOR 3 MEMNaws. 110311 SHERIDAN BLVD. WESTMINSTER, COLORADO 80020 PHONE: (303)-466-1831 FAX: (303)-466-1838 LEGEND: - PROPOSED BOUNDARY LINE PROPOSED R.O.W. PROPOSED LOT LINE PROPOSED CENTERLINE - PROPOSED SETBACK PROPOSED IRRIGATOR ESMT. 1 PROPOSED LOT NUMBER 0 PROPOSED BLOB( NUMBER # PROPOSED STREET LIGHT EXSTNG ROW. - - - - - E] STNG EOA EXS MG FENCE -OHE- OF E- EMSTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC EXISTING TREES 7T/7TTlTlTTT ow UNITS PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL THIS_DAY OF20_, BY THE WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION. CHAIRPERSON CITY CERTIFICATION: APPROVED THIS-DAY OF20_, BY THE WHEAT RIDGE CITY COUNCIL ATTEST CITY CLERK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR MAYOR PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDERS CERTIFICATE: THIS OOCUMENT ACCEPTED FOR HUNG IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER OF JEFFERSON COUNTY AT GOLDEN, COLORADO, ON WE DAY OF2D_, AD., IN BOOK- PAM RECEPTION N0. JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER BT DEPUTY OWNER'S CERTIFICATION: THE BELOW-SIGNED OWNER(S), OR LEGALLY DESIGNATED AGENT(S) THEREOF, DO HEREBY AGREE THAT THE PROPERTY LEGALLY DESO68E0 HEREON WILL BE DEVELOPED AS A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT IN ACCORDANCE WIN THE USES. RESTRICTIONS AND COIURONS CONTAINED IN THIS PLAN. AND AS MAY OTHERNASE BE REWIRED BY LAW. I (WE) FURTHER REDIGNUE THAT THE APPROVAL W REZONING TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. AND APPROVAL W TNIS OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN DOES NOT CREATE A VESTED PROPERTY RIGHT. VESTED PROPERTY RIGHTS MAY ONLY ARISE AND ACCRUE PURSUANT TO THE PRONSONS OF SECTION 28-121 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE W LAWS SIGNATURE OF OWNER(S) W AGENT(S) NOTARY PUBLIC: SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN BEFORE ME THIS AY OF 20_. "WESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL MY COMMISSION EXPI SHEET INDEX: i COVER SHEET 2 TYPICAL SECTION/OVERALL PLAN 3-4 SITE PLAN 5-10 ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS 11 SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN 12-14 LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET 1 OF 14 SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 3 FDP VICINITY MAP SCALE 1'= 12W SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 3 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE A PART OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO TYPICAL SECTIONS R.O.W. ENSRNO unu a. ESMT. =S ~ \ \ J~ / 1 I T ~ ` g~\ 2- C.B-Ij \l I~ ) I 0 32 ]p I I 1~ ~I~ BOB PROPOSED 5.0'~ `6' OERTCAL fi CONCRETE CORE & GUTTER CL CURB SIOEWA H PROPOSm L6.0 AWN SECTION B-B TREE wwN W. 54TH AVENUE TYPICAL SECTION (EXISTING-CITY OF ARVADA) N.T.S. R.o.W. 44O R-FL \-P ROPOSED 75' TREE LAWN PROPOSED 5.0 CONCRETE SIDEWALK (EASEMENT DEDICATED TO WMEAT RIDGE) I a SECTION B-B RIDGE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS TYPICAL S CTION N.T.S. VERTICAL IS & GUTTER i ; j-~:; Lr~LL' t SO 1 W 0 100 20~T. MGM SCALE B _ 7 =7 1 ~ q 3 ~j 1 , ~i i/ I I 3 i / SHEET 3 .1, 7 4 M r - I e A ' „ - - J , I ; Ip I IT 6~ z I i it I -I A fe I I ~A C I I SHEET 4 i -SHEET 2 OF 14 SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 3 FDP RIDG RO IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED BY OTHERS .0' 4.0 11.0' IOA' 11.0' ad' 0' SECTION A-A =I A LOCAL STREET SECTION N.T.S. SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 3 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE A PART OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO SITE PLAN / 1 G _ _ 1111 PROPOSED R-R es 4 h A venu_e__ - -OETACIIED WALN-ITT s' TRACT C 9,299 SO. FT. 10.00' 108.54 IR PROPOSED TRACT B 3,040 SO. FT.G CONCRETE [(REO. N8935'34"E H DETAINED WALK 110.89 95.33' 82.50 X235 '-gMpr 1 4, Ay FOR E PARTIALLY 10 O RE)OSTINGNAGE ANDONED) F1200729) 8,648 SQ. FT, DETE CHANNEL NTION FACI9,163 SQ. FT. J U ,~p 9.904 SQ. FT m L p1ENnON I: III BARBED WIRE 1 14,181 SQ. FT. , 11pp 123'54- - A POND FENCE - ro TRACT A F III ,'I I \ - \ o° W o m 2.72 ACRES J - - q I° Pi 0 L I \ \ / c27 3 oO' ° I 2 ° 118,689 SO. FT. 0 8.648 sq. Fr I° -rM - ttt - a•xz l., I II - > _T ! ~t \ l 8'48' • L - J SsInNG 1 / N89 35 34,.E °0 123.E - hi 109.62' 9 O 4 I N m 5192856"E N _ 9.474 SQ. FT. 00 Of 26.02' " O ~m ^4y 70.45' C,g I M 590'00'00"E k I dt It 3 \ - - - - 39.70 N t, - T Ca LSD' 10.540 S0, -I- p[_._________ _ _122.94 SIDE 1o C3 ` , '1i / ai rv SETBACK W p \ / / .4 I1.i II II 8 I ! I N89'a64 5 200 --1 I"1oo > Fy, Ja Ire 19.57 'I y I Y1 i 7.944 SQ. FT. I m FRONT . , p 4SETBACK L ° ° 14,396 SQ. fF c 7,919 SQ. FT. I(p d \ / iEG O -I I 1-- 11I O' .120 - C 7 Z ES r 59 1 3 so / I / IB I I 21 7.920 SQ. FT. `6 EXISTING CIlY OF MEAT RIDC£ O I ~T to -F OARHEAAD BOUNDARY LINE I 2 T NS C 13,371 SO. FT. . '4 7,920 SO. FT. PROPOSED 20.00' IS # _ ,2Q.Q0_ L tREAR n ~IRRIGATON EASEMENT/ SETBACK j / a. l r..: _.::FC 1 I b _12059 I);;I FI 7,920 SQ. FT. ° r 1 TRACT G PROPOSED <...1 _ B EMSnNC 1RR1GAnQN 26 o ° 0.55 ACRES / i I RENO-JUIIEN n !-.i j;. I I _ IRRICATON PIT tF LINE (ABANDONED) ° ° 9 O % 99 in PROPOSED S i y' TN 1000' t 20.' _ d 4 - 1 I'O I 7,920 SQ. FT. I1p CONCRETE FRONT J~ FRONT REAR I Liu ATTACHED WAUC I' 1 _ I_ L - ~ (TYP) SETBACK SETBACK 0 I a 1= C, 3 P d = _ =JUCHEM-RENO IRRIGATION SYSTEM= 10.840 SO. FT. 30.00' 7.920ARgA IN 1' - ° 1 7.50' EoE J 1 NO WATER EASEMENT 16 N8 E- ]20.Q9 $ 0 SETBAO( ''(T E PARTIALLY ABANDONS II -p(IL} 19-'4649 -1 PROPOS ED 12$.48' R. W. I i__ Cy . Ft200729) ) -~T 1U If II Z PROPOSED r BO 4 - II °o l n h o.I IRRIGATION EASEMENT L 5EMENT I O 12j,9$ - ,2059- 4 w I r I- 'p, I I III I 7,920 SQ. FT. °-'I 8.842 SQ, FT. I m 3 00 ° O N 1 l~ Cl L_ T - J FL I I m N 4 71920 SQ. FT m1 - - - - 8,981 SO, FT, I pi . 4 III I PROPOSED 20.00' of II( I -124_O(,L _ _ - 13614_ - bl IRRIG~AT J ON EASE MENTI I I I 1 Z r r r- / O I IOl OI I O N 12 IIJUCHEM-RENO IRRIGATION SYSTEM ro 5 0 9,032 SQ. FT. TRACr o z 4(5-0-so. FT. D I 7,9zQ sQ. FT I~ =1 I t 9'46'49"W- 120.00' L - _ - F L - _ - T r - J _ I Ie MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 4 I ,It 00 O O0 l I r - M1„ r 40 0 4D SO ORIGINAL SCALE: 1•x40• C URVE TABLE CURVE LENGTH RADIUS DELTA CH. BEARING CHORD Cl I1J.81 200.00 33'4500" SD.16'5CE 116.11 L2 V6.J1 300.00 33'4500" N17'1CWW 174,17 C3 26.12 300.00 4'59'16" 50254'04"E 26.11 C4 65.49 30000 123030 3805345W 65,36 C5 12.79 300.00 226'34' SSE2't7"W 12.9 C6 11.56 ]5.00 89'48'95" 544'4191'W 105.89 C] 26..97 15. 0 99'5]48" S55-22-WE 22.98 C8 23.94 27525.,50 7'5916' 502'54'04"E 23.93 C9 43.13 325.00 T36'12' N0412'J2 "W 43.10 Ci0 64.10 32500 rm'm Y' Ni3'39'JB'W 63.99 CI 0,01 2 20.01 325.00 AI }3, 1' 38" N21V4'2J'W 20.00 C12 64.21 325.00 1179'09' "W N28'29'S1 .10 64 C13 21.52 175.00 7'02'49" 53038'01E 21.51 Ct4 81,55 1]500 26'42"It" S13.45'31 E 80,82 Cis 23.51. 15.00 90'00'00' 544'3534"W 2121 CIb 23.56 15.00 895]'52' Na524'26 W 21 21 C17 23.56 15.00 90V000" N44'35'34E 2121 C18 12.92 10000 7'2408 585'5330W 1291 C19 10.63 100.00 6'0521" S)9'08'46 'W 1082 C20 1468 15.00 56tl338" 575'5205'E ta10 C21 45.21 45 .Op 57'33'28" N76'5700"W 4333 C22 9068 45.00 51' 735' 548.4229 W 39.31 C23 51 S2 45.00 65 }6 DI' S09'59 20"E 48.75 C24 1468 1500 s6'0338" NIV4532 W 1410 C25 2355 100.00 13'2929" S0611*33'W 2349 I_C26 .la 1400 8054 Oa" N40'1351'E 19,46 C2] 34.26 32500 6U223 577.3942 W 34,24 C28 1960 15.00 ]a 5141' S37'12'39"W 18.23 C29 ]1 ]6 2]5.00 14'5]'04" S82VJ'02"W 7t55 C30 22.46 1500 85'4]'11' N47-305W" 2042 C}1 20.95 1500 80'021T N34-372C E 19.29 C32 2231 15.00 85'1311 N47'47'50"w 2031 C33 Ji Jfi 50.00 821356" Sa8281 65,76 C3a 2},61 1500 9pt115 545'18'48"E 2125 C35 23.56 15.00 900000" N44.3534E 21.21 C3 61.68 22500 13'5332" NO W 66.51 C37 ] 21.52 95.00 4'28'59 '28 Nl6-32328 W 2151 C3B 2061M 01 95.00 1 N2D'S2'o2'w 01 139 53.8 2]5.00 111'1.12 1219 9 N28831) W 5j 5120 C40 113 .76 22500 285811' 519'40'20"E 112.56 c41 .}9 4 00 3 0'46'9" so5no'25'E 4.39 C42 6.62 52 0 50.00 S03'34'13W 6.61 C43 58 )5.00 .54 44'54 S6JV8'23'W 57.29 C44 58,78 )TOO 44'54'23' S22't 4'00'W_ 9.29 8DI 1. ALL UTUTY LINES WTHIN AND AFFECTING THE BOUNDARY OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TO BE PLACED UNDERGROUND. 2 RECORDED STRE£1SCAPE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED TO ENSURE THAT MAINTENANCE OF THE LANDSCAPING ALONG PRIVATE PROPERTY WTHIN ME ADJACENT RIGHT-OF-WAY IS THE RESPONSIGIUTY OF ME INDPADUAL PROPERTY OWNER AND/OR ME HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION. MANNTENANCE OF LANDSCAPING WITHIN THE RIDGE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY IS HE RESRO.NEBRITY OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER. 3. HOME MODELS SHALL BE INTERSPERSED WM NO TWO SIMILAR STRUCTURES CONSTRUCTED WITH ME SAME ELEVATION ON ADJACENT LOTS OR THE LOTS ACROSS ME STREET. 4. THE STORM DEIENHON AREA HERE SHOWN AS TRACT A SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED BY ME OWNER AND SUBSEQUENT OWNERS. HEIRS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS IN ME EVENT MAT SUCH CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE IS NOT PERFORMED BY SAID OWNER. ME CITY OF MEAT RIDGE SHALL HAVE ME QUOIT TO ENTER SUCH AREA AND PERFORM NECESSARY WDflN, THE COST OF WHICH SAID OWNER. HERS SUCCESSORS. AND ASSIGNS AGREES TO PAY. NO BUILDING OR STRUCTURE WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE DETENTION AREA AND NO CHANGES OR ALTERATIONS AFFECTNG THE HYDRAULIC CHARACTERISTICS OF ME DETENTION AREA WILL BE MADE WITHOUT ME APPROVAL OF TIE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS 5. IT 15 ME INTENT OF MELODY HOMES, INC. TO INCLUDE SKYLINE ESTATES RUNG 3 INTO ME E51ASUSHED HOA FOR SKYLINE ESTATES FUNDS I AND 2 SHEET 3 OF 14 SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 3 FDP SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 3 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE A PART OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO MATCH_NE SEE SHEET 3 SITE PLAN a ! 3' ~I 0 I $ F -120 a0'- - z - - 136,25' m 8.465 SO FT. ! I 7910 SO F. I _ m a I 6 hSI I o~ L-- -J 3 a m1 SQ. FT DO D BWNOA0.Y pN - _ _ _ J 7.920 SQ. FT, a u 9.04620. 00' FRONT _12SLQ _ I I f SEiBACX 1 Ii _ o --1 _ L-_r~-J - o f 9 to N 120M _ 8.400 So- FT. Id n o 0 - - - - 13Zll_ _ -1 n 0 2 B 7,920 SD. FT. ° W. r o z BARBEOIXIS,z I ~ a I ~ Im°I '0 I ~ - L-- -J ° ° - - -1 N o 9.060 50. FT. J20'0 7.920 S0. FT. °-,I I m I> i - RV- ` - of f__lzoao --r ---r _ a I ~ » 4i 4 ~F ^I . i_.1._ I N O I o 120,00 727.39 _ o ) o I`'_ai'u (c 2 nl r m°o 71 SIDE 1 n I 8.400 50. FT. ^ N 7.920 50. FL I I Ioo I 8 I SEMACK9 I 'ob L li _i__:j ` .L - - - 7 _ Ie o'". 9.075 so. Fr. e f - ---I t < - m I ,910 so. Fr. I° = b 1zosD - - I! 1 ! 118.00 M - - 10W aEAR /'I SETBACK- 73 _ OP o I 11 m J~ oc _ ' COET< y 589'46'49"W 257.60' b, 1 IIl . ^ A m I 5AONCREE N I 8.400 50. FT. Ib A~EG n TRACT E wAIN (TW) w TRACT F 9,697 SO. FT. r PROPOSED 5- I y I M 8,550 SO- FT. 227.68' ATTAGNED N m ~ - II I _ j~ I on O C29 _ _ _ n 12015 i I I m 1 0 76.55 50 W. N89'35'34"E 3100' o r 1m II zy - "1 12 I.ao Ii 9I! N7q- , m I 8,462 S0. FT. Ip o 331 N ^ I X 8 G29 140.02' 77 .92' 1P ~16 - -J~ 78.59 R=30096" 120.43 A-2'26'34" [>R=300'30" R 300.00' D A-r I L365, 49' G LR-12.0]9'0 =26.12' W TRACT A 2.72 ACRES I DRAINAGE EASEMENT WIDTH n W1DTN vAPoES LOT 1 BLOCK 4 d w 1" 1$' W.Oo1.73 ACRES TRACT H I ZONED PID 3 0.78 ACRES Ip DRMNAGE~EAENT E)OSIING USE. INDUSTRIAL I 1 u I FOR COLUMBINE ZONED: pUD-1 GTTyY OF (MAINTENANCE BY INDMDUAL LOT OWNER) a I o BASIN E%AT RIDGE (INTERIM SEEDING TO BE PROVIDED BWWNDARY LINE PERO OVERLOT ON CONTROL GRADING D PLAN) z 1~ 57q•3830"~2g 7~ ; '11 I ~ ~ slsEwALN pd 'v Ea~TMENr 157 1 m ' I 5j4ig3p W~5%87' /zo I I I ' i I / I 3500' ~i~~ ETOSTNG 30.OD' i / ORFpRA MISIMBINE Wj08~i~~' aR .''j_~as WATER EASEMENT I BASIN 4'3$~ SSOD' DIG (i0 BE PARPAIIY ABANDON SANITARY ~ pp '1 `ORTN M. SKISW EST. (REC. Na F12W]29) i / / ; i' 'EASEMENT 450 Ff-' J!CWSi By 0 UARR' WE MON #FWM74 i i NN00' i _ r ! 5.1 STING EOP_ . - i (BY OME OTHERS) y~ 3 i~ bl m w Y, 4 LLI m ~ N ~I O S~ 10 >z a' is 4 r 4 ~ ~ i <F 4M I H9 III BE TH JNC 3 40 0 40 BO ORIGINAL SCA - 1'=b' 5.19' I ALL . ALL UTILITY LINES "THIN AND THE BOUNDARY OF THE AFTECIING UI PROPOSED DEVELOPMENNT T TO BE PLACED D UNOERCRWND. PI-AGED 1 RECORDED STTEEISCAPE MMNTENANCE A(STED.IENTS SILL BE REWIRED TO ENSURE MAT MAINTENAN RI THE LANDSCAPING ALONG PRIVATE PROPERTY N THE ADJACENT NT RIGHT-OF-WAY 15 THE RESPONSBIUTY OF ME INDINWPI PROPERTY OWNER AND/OR THE ER ASSMATON. MAINTENANCE OF LANDSCAPING N11HIN OF THE ROAD ITIM PoCT ME RIDGE WAY IS ME RESPOHSBIDTY W THE M ER. ADJACENT PROPERTY OSNER 3 NOME MODELS Sli L BE INTER9'ERSEO WIN NO TWO SMRAR M.50 MSTING M-EOP STRUCTURES CONSTRUCTED AM THE SAME ETEVATIW W ADJACENT LOTS M THE LOTS ACROSS THE STREET. ' 4. THE STGtM OEDDNPON AREA HERE SHOWN AS TRACT A SHALL BE ~SMCTSD AND D MNNTAMED BY THE OWNER AND SUBSEOUMT ~ ISIR OWERS. DESSO THAT SUCH OWNERS, HEIRS BS AND ASSIGNS. IN THE W s N N AND MA MA M INTENANCE NOT PER D BY SAID OWNER, O E 0`IY F EA ROGE SHALL H ME OF WHEA TIE S TO FNTFR SUCH AN AE OliX C T ARE4 PERFORM NECESSARY NARK THE COST OE WHICH SAID . 1 OWNER. HEIRS, SU(M AND ASSbti~ AGRE£S TO PAY. NO O IL)RE W MI BUILDING W STRUCTURE CONSI THE DETENTION OR T S AREA AND NO CHANGES OR THE HnRAUTIC AFFECTING - M AREE A WU CHARAC OF THE DETENTION BE E MADE WMWT ME OF SU RKS - N- OF ME APPROVAL OF E DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS 5. IT IS ME INTENT OF MELODY HOMES, INC. TO INCLUDE SKYLINE ESTATES RUNG 3 INTO ME ESTABLISHED HOA FOR SKYUNE ESTATES FUNDS I AND 1 SHEET 4 OF 14 SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 3 FDP SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 3 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE A PART OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO REPRESENTATIVE ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS 3 3 0 z o°r - ~a a w w x x a ad d 6 Y¢ u- um 00 06 SHEET 5 OF 14 1 SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 3 FDP SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 3 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE A PART OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO REPRESENTATIVE ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS 3 a w x a a °o¢ iE WJ- Om O~ 2E 6 Oli FW hrX 000 a a z. ~o ~a x~ ~W [0 'sE SHEET 6 OF 14 SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 3 FDP SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 3 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE 3 3~ 0 0~ ~o i zo 0 _ oQ a a~ 'w i a oa iE o'm o'm a~ om S£ YIL 6 WpZW LL 00x60 6~ZO£I A PART OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO REPRESENTATIVE ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS t SHEET 7 OF 14 SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 3 FDP SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE A PART OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO REPRESENTATIVE ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS 0 0 a w w o - Z SLL W~ZWI 6x0 J`;oE .3 SHEET 8 OF 14 SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 3 FDP 3 0 z a w s a a LL a~ oa i£ 3 om v o~ ~o if x a°ww ~o SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 3 FDP SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 3 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE A PART OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO REPRESENTATIVE ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS 3 3`~ o a~ z zo 0 or - -a a a-~ w w w~ x x a ad o¢ o~ LL£ LLy 06 Om Op O~ Oz Z£ YtL 4~WiW x3LL o_nzoi SHEET 10 OF 14 SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 3 FDP 0-3 N "l SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 3 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE A PART OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO SIGNAGE AND STRIPING W. m 4 D-3 W G ST P 30'ry 0. 1 --1 , T, 7 xtv _ws M. 5Am a[ D-3 r, 1 50 0 5D 100 ORIgNAL SCALE 1'=50' O XATM AND TYPE W STREET LIGHTING HAS L BEEN DERALG1463 BY O M ENERGY. DESIGN EA4 O(CFL Mll~ ~ U3 . . 25-3 . ) 4 ENERGY PLANNER. (3 ~ # PROPOSED STREET LIGHT LOCATION \ SWEPT UGHT T1PES: ~1 2S FlBERn P0I£S DB BLAM \ \ O 100W HPS POST TOP LUM MODERN \ \ TNM 12/2 SEC IN PEO INN 4AL TN SEC AINTED O P50WANPS PF T LENS COSRAA BRONN MN 24XO W/W B.C. TRM 12/2 SEC IN PED O s~ 1815011 A D_3 % t S am/ `.1 , \ 1 1 PTINRE Mous,ww (TO 8E 0@ELOPED BY DT&RB) 1 4, 1 l,\ SHEET 11 OF 14 SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 3 FDP TREE PLANTING LIST SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 3 °°°WBGwoPmmesB NT PLAN N RC NE"NIXY WFFEETiFE °YMNOC TVLB6B AL DEVELOPME FI S4 UMMRASH PENN LV S PEN"BYLVAW.%.SII MMR YCAIBLB BN WI® . WES WE? TER CMBFRRV ELTBSUERCU O MMA US iALS A AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE H ESUNREppAK NRO NORT HERN QUEFCUSRUO WFRWS G 'PA PARpNE0.91 FReANUSPENN PEMNSYLV0.WIFPAtMORE m YGLBBB EV~EGREANSSN"PUAS" FlwJB"usAMFR'wu'nMUMIJ NRP1e Yulese A PART OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 16, CG CIXCRADOSPRUCE UNG RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH JUNIPE SCO J°""~"'~`°P'"D""" HTG$.BSB.ISPEP M B>r B~ , 0& AALLTREE , . . CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY. OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO AN ANIIR M4RE KFRGWXNA BGUMP,IXB GRC CAt14GAAE0 GHq(EQERRY W1p ApkEm• Y ~ ~ TH TWHVWCHORN TW TWWJIEBBCOCICiNR HAWRWPN. CSMTAE SCR CMTAEWS-Amn GYdEP CRATAEWCPUSGW1WFIiM15 - Yam YLA LANDSCAPE PLAN RC R4GIEME M4US'RPDNm' Cm SSC SPWNGSNOWNOWCRACR>&PqE MB1U58PRWGSNOVf TG4Lm BSB SBB BH,DMDWBERNCEBEAm'. AMElANM1ERCAHA0E1&IS PWUMF 6' PERIMETER FENCE & BRICK COLUMN DETAIL N.T.S. SHRUB PLANTING LIST PERIMETER FENCE TRANSITIONAL FENCE E ERDR N9HRUS CCI GV.64RY GRPETJIMPER JUNIPFAU45PBMA'WRWY WIPER BUJ BRM➢MWRJIINIPFA JUN MUSS<BIN48RIX• ,GGT TJ TPMJUNIPER JUNIPERUSSLMNATAMARISUGA' MP NLGOPIAE PINUSMWO M TARLF TOP ME JUNIPER JUMPERUSNAPULORUMTOLBIFIOPBL UP mm. DEGDUOUSSHRUBS ACC ANERICPNCOMPACTR.PNBERRY VIBURNUNTRILOBUMWYMAPPLNM PONET APP APACHEMME FAWIGNPAWOOX4 f - AM A HONYWATENERSPREA SPIRAFABUM4DA'NmIGlTWATFRFJ2 Cffi AC. PLPINEWNUM RRESAIPNUN MBWM~w: BE SEAUIYBU91 KOLNWIRJAAVAB6S gqq~ so BLUEMASTSPIREN CARYOPTERR%CIPNDFNEN51$ 98'b F O"IX" ~C C rtrt~~~~ B FERNBVSH H4M4EPATNRNWUUF3VJWUM - GW GOLODRWPJIFImLIA PoTEMILIAY%%D qmP 1165 MM MpIMNNNNpGaM CERCOWNUS MOMANIIS COMMONNRPIEIAAC PL 6YWNUAWLG41i5 35'5. 'E.. RE RUSSLWSWE PFHOVSNNATPoftICRBIt :°1A er RB RABBRBRLWH. TPLL CAEFN CHRYSOIWUIUSN4Ll5E°SIISGMVEWFNS ~ n BY SWM'EEDYUCCA YUCCACLJJGI IR1Zew 3 PM SO SILVERBFARY GAEAGNUSCOMMUTATA SB SFABUCIOIION HIPPoPfvLE RIWNN01OE4 NS " e NOTES, EMS SMOOTH SUMAC ' RHUSGUSR4 S NDCOLUMN S f. O PLAN FOR BE SV IUTODN SF1NICc~GiRY AMEUNCMERNNIFIXN ' p TOMAT IN RUNG RMC LMANU IN FlUNGN0.1 N A OUR GOLDENUMWRNSHRUBROSE RM CAIDE"WpJRN RTWODCH FILI G . 1, 3. PPIMrvMA FENCE IENCE TO m MATCH FILING 0. 1, SC SPRFAMNGCCTONFABTER COTONEPBTERGNALGTIS w ' w 1L5 THREEUDLFSUWC W( WAYFARINGTREE RHUSTRL MTA VIBURNUM IPM E" W2' :VE91`JUI S6NOCXE9R: ANA PRUNUS B£54Y: V RAIL FENCE CM CUMEAFMOUMAINM4pG.VIY CERCOCFRPUSLEWFODUS i Gv WYOrewluax SAL%EAGUA N.T.S. PERENNIAL PLANTING LIST m C GRWND COVER S NN'PLFLQNE93 ARFO BLECOREO"S ow fEAP56 CORE°PS6GPANDRLORA'BW1R4M iQALCOM. BURCUN BBF BURGUNDY DLANI MANItET GULIARDWIORPNWFldt4'BURDIM01' 1NL CON. q. FLOWER. , 17 LPN CREENNGMLOX PHLOXwU TAIwrGN 1GOLCONT. NO RED DAYLVIY HEMEROCAWSSP. - IGAL.CONr. ~p IS SIBERNNIN' WSMSERCA 1m CONT. DL WELIAMORODATLLLY HEMEROGMS 1GAL,CONT A ASTER ASTER%FR9WmU 1° 130W. BFS M KE DWSW RU°SEIXWFULGCA 1GPL.CONT, BF V P LON IFLOMeUHgMWY CREEFNGP HLOX URACAT HLOII S TATVM 1 GALWN! SE, SUPPLER R BUGLER PEMRTEMON BUGLE MDNBPA BAN PFNSi E S GP 1 IF BP SULPHUR i ENO°DNUNUMBEl1ANM 1W..CONT. OJM. CONE 'ER YELLMS ROFLE"~ ` HL= M 7lr iM~` WOOD PRIVACY FENCING DETAIL CY WMMONWHREYARROW ACHILLEAM6L m 1GALWM NOB NAWEBEESNM MONARBAFl9IULOSA 1GAL.CONT. IJ TS BAG BWE AVENAGRUSS NEUCTOIPICHONBfY#AVWFM 1WL. G_ W! . BFG BWE FESCUE GWUS FESRIG -EW BUUF 1G cow` OF I FRG FFATIERRFIDGRAR CUANAGROSRISARUICBWEA 1G4L WYT . LEGEND ALFDE 5IB DECIDUOUS TREE AREA TO REMAIN pNDIA REED E DEVELOPMENT OF THE SIT TE OF TH ' ~ IRRIGATED NATIVE GRASS SEED ORNAMENTALT REE. - PERENNW-SAND GROUND COVERS' DECIDUOUS SH RUB 9 /1 FESCU W 99, a ~ EEC g 'aSE CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. ALL BWEGRASS9W MFASPAETORECENEJSYPA~IDW SF.OGSOLLPREPAMTMH MATCxwcTHE FOUOmxc Wxomaxs>szaflGMpNArrER'uwnHOStMSALr. SSPH RPNGE IBU i03U1 CAABONTO NITRWFNSL%AGEO MANURE 2. AIL WPUNRNGS RSAWPtN.EFORFOR BEDSCOMAMEDWmISTFFI FDGFRARETO &'MULWWWIIHYDE~IH 112°W CLRR°GRTOI=MkML PRjoFRE 1u FA9NC 3. ALL GROUNDCOVER BEDSW& FLMETO BE MULCHED °BULCXEDYTX]'pEPM,BHREDOFll CEOR MULCH WBMIT34MPLE FOfl APPROJPI PP%NYi°WSINIAIKKI. 4. All PIANLINGSBEDSAREi°WfAMNxEDBYtA'%d'GRRI£1l INfFltl.N'(WGTYPE51EF1EW'L4 MWSONORAPPRWEDMMENG ONLY.CONIWL'IORTOSIJ&W1W.61EFORMPN & WOMISOTRFAMMWHEREBMISAJ)A'TTOWPBS,WN ,MAD FENCE. EOGFAWILLBEflFAUIRED WHEN4AWCENItOWFN WllLFENCE 5. Au TILFESPAEiDBE5FP1lG10RpUYEO FERDETNLB PoRAPor WUOFCNEYFPA. 8, REFER iOPIANB PNOSPEGFICATONSFg1NRTM-I1WARNNgNREGPTDNG WJPSCME INSTALIATIG! 1. THECON PM 1CMDPWEFORIHECOBTTOREPNRUI0.1RE5,PANCPIF IANOSGPE,P118LICPND PRIVATEATE PROPFRLYTHTI9 CANNEDBYTEOJNIR4CIOR °R BYTNEIR WBWNIRACT0ICSOPFlUTONSOUPBJGINSTPIIATW OR. 11E5PEGFl® M4N1ENhYCEPERIS WLFORU]I D LCGTFBPFX.`R M'E%GVATgN. B. IMMORPPGi0RSH4LREPoPANLYWFWIVSFELOCGmmON3 IMMFDNTELTTOTHELARGIRECT.i,PASIT000MBIUINGWPHTHE PoWIDNO IItlSCAPE 09COUESUON. 9. THECC BE RESPONSIBLEFORiHERFPAIROFANYOFTNEIRTREACHES Ofl IXCAVATVAIRDNMRRSMU SNALLRIBt5 PEEI1LE.CiE0 10. THEWNiPACNOPR sAND i0BEFP omm11NDl°FOLLOWiHEUNDbfAPE qND IRRM,ATIONPINNB 5PEC61GTI0NBP5GOSELYASP055&E 11. WNOT DISNRB IHEIXISTINGPAVBNa,LIGmNG, WID£CMNG.ORIRPoPFMWTH4T E% ISPNGAOJACEWTOTHESREUNL655NOTF MO Efl 12 ALLTREE PITS NSODORMMEPAE/SARETORECENES'DEPIHOFSHREDD UDA MULCH. N° WEEDWMROLFPJINCOREWERE~,IBFDWiHE6£A , 13, REFER TO THE ENGINEERS PIANS FOR GWM SIDEWALK. OWUNWE, NPH ANDGN MGMINFL, M DGROUNLOGARRIN 1<: DENCTENNNI, ANNUALANDGROUNpGQJERMNI@tiSPRE mBE EQUALLY SPACED UBINDiBIVIGUURS°ACING. UNLESS SHOWNAS 15 T IRREGUPRGPACIhtl.ALL5HRU0 PIFNIING98Y BPECIEBAf1EttJ BEEWALLYSPACFD USWGTNEBPACINGIYPESNOWN ON LMTITI°N SiAKEPNDRRTOVER IIWGATONIINFd T1ELWDBGPPECIXJIRACTIXi WILLPAVF TO MOVE IRNGATON LINEBIFiXETINIERFERE WmITaECpWFLTPIA2l1EROF TREES IB. ALL TRFET°BE OFSPEGMEN°UALN. CONTFUCTCR RIXPWS@LE TO REVIEW PN VA1 WPH OWNER REPRESEMATVE PIUCRTO CfLNGMON SITE 17 . WMMUOR SHALL SEED ALL NON SODDED OR BEOARFFS WHCHARE MURSE°BY WFIILOFORCGNG MH NATIVE SEED MIX UNLESS DIHERMCGE NOTED CNTHEPL 10.1AN03CAFEIMFROJEMENIBSNOWNONMIS PIFNSH4LNLSERISTALLFDIN WNSIRUCTONHV3E1. SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL TREE PLANTING DETAIL N.T.S. N.T.S. T.L ~w I I BLUE M55-SOD + ..EVERGREEN TREE NON-IRRIGATED NATIVE GRASS SEED NATIVE SEED MIX: ARKANSASVALLEY LOW GROW MD( SEEDING RATE: 25 LBS. PUUACRE EVERGREEN SHRUB MO UNin~N COBBLEE DIR. * FCOPNG • TO BE USED IN ALL DESIGNATED AREAS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLAN COMMON NAME % WK NO.1 C OLOR FROM FlLING CH ORNAMENTAL GRASSES EPHRAIM CRESTED WHEATGRASS 30 _ t` y I I S' HT. PERIMETER FENCE AND COLUMNS FSUb s xDT smw ON FuN.1 SONLE Fu LOT. 0ANSHO r DWARF PERENNIAL RYEGRASS 25 - 3 RAIL FENCE xAV MTALL T S Sr OF FENCING w SSE AW RFAR FR y LNGL (SEE DETAIL THIS SHEETI. SR3200 BLUE FESCUE 20 (SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET) a d WOOD PRIVACY FENCE REUBENSCANADA BLUEGRASS 5 ,IIIIILLa L III (SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET) - CHEWINGS FESCUE 10 (SEE DETAIL THIFENCE ET) WW" NOURiS DULLFA flennw8 twltlOCepBPTdIINCNe T1DWMACtl Aww Falm 8B ftn03[0.M.8R£.1.118R .IIVBmPUeamm SHEET 12 OF 1z SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 3 FDP E SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 3 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE 0 20' 4T w A PART OF THE SW 1 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 69 WEST OF THE 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, NORTH scALE1^=49'-0° CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO LANDSCAPE PLAN SKYLINE ESIATES EXISTING . FILING. k1 SKYLINE #1 saoo' ZONED RESIDENTIAL R-D. w. CITY OF AR'e'P.GA EXISTING 3000 R.O.\'I xawruxwse<E T Ixc DETACH sIxEWnuc 42f. PWSE CNEH'' 36.00 :0 0s 0~ ~TH F 0 30.0 EwsnNC WATER EASEMENT X 3.~C ILK: zw - Wd RGOF 1 tl - ~lfc f8al W FAO auDL ' aP ~ r~oF W G 2618 ry W ns R~ BRICK COLUMN iYP egg w % DT „ . (ro BE PARTIAL) ( a 2x7 H ` ms ePprcpawxx ABANDONED) (REC. No F1200129) i. R ) TCPC ilyW$fl Wxu 'FACE - PExP1ElEM1 I.m - - , - - ~n T ExisrlNG ~ , zc exbrcpausx saoa vmwu- ` ( eARSE NCE rCNCE- Twsww.E : ROW _ .~)}pCj' p, ^ 2 rab yCRES ~ ' A `YM 3 3200 3MLFFRNEE FL FL r y . WOOD PRIVACY FENCING BV HOMEOWNERS MM z FF 4 1 . pGE GET I•- Iba.. BAfs MACK s SD.ao' . R o l OVERH EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC C T4 UN RIDGE -BD URDARY 1AT O' 11 IRRIGATION ATION noN ens+enr IRRIGATION PROPOSED serBACrv SITYUNE ESTATES FILING L A ~ CITY OF ARVADA ~4 EXISTING IRRIGATION CJ W AA € ' LINE (ABANDONED) F ?ROVOEEO 5 ' 2000` rv000.... . w DO . GavGRCTE , RGNt rvooOPHrvA SaC rvni k E s TBnG; , 2 PwcE - tivN~ .Q xx, . R M1I,FENCE T ' N _ ' iH EI\@ R'l S ' 7J, Rl' WJA ]PNtfEXCE: 50 SIpE - - 3900 EXIS4G WATER EASEMENT SD no SETBACK SRC1' (YOB PARTIAUr ABINDJNED)~` ~xrv PROPOSED 2 000 Y IREC NO '1200]29) aWCKCIXUNx IRRIGAn0N EASEMENT ' _ I®( ~ rwgamaxuFwcE 90.41 FENtE ~ ' .32 DO I FL-FL Mimi Lm MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 14 IRRIGATED NATIVE PERIMETERFENCE GRASS SEED PERENNIALS AND o BRICKCOLUMN GROUND COVERS TRANSITIONAL FENCE 90110 FESCUE BLUE GRASS SOD THREE RAIL FENCE NON-IRRIGATED NATIVE GRASS SEED GRASS SEED WOOD PRIVACY FENCE M8 DIA. MOUNTAIN COBBLE MATCH COLOR FROM FILING I DECIDUOUS TREE TBED HE DEVEL PME D NG N T U IR OF THE SITE O ORNAMENTAL TREE DECIDUOUS SHRUB O EVERGREEN TREE F EVERGREEN SHRUB ORNAMENTAL GRASSES LIMIT OF GRADING UNDISTURBED ZONED Al, AGRICULTURAL Tf OF WHEAT VDI M * !E II J" NOIO<IS DULLFA P~mhx IaMUepe ArdiAeMre T10Wex1GdfAAVrwe OanveF, CAbeAo BP2M SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 3 FDP TYPICAL FRONT YARD LANDSCAPE SCALE 1ISI: ^ 0 29 40' 80. NORTH SCALE 1"=40'V R . WOOD PRIVACY FENCE WOOD PRIVACY FENCING BY HOMEOWNER BARRED WIRED MIR E E FENCa ~ CITY OF ARVADA BOUNDARY LINE EXISTING BARBED '.NRE FENCE-T PRLCP0SED Sh YI NE ESTATES L Il, CITY uF AP,VADA PERIMETERFENCE - -,•NC ' a1 a101 0 RICK COLUMN (TYP.) ,RAIL FENCE -7 SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 3 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE A PART OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO LANDSCAPE PLAN MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 13 i- now - -j 12 I _ J I Y k al I"T (P SEq a - _ I i `w L715E II A ! tAi{ 1t. 1~T r1 I' I c3 ii 1 1T / ~tl } 2000 FRONT - yi I 9E MACK - / 1 1 / I Ai 1CA1~ 11 e L ED )0 g wl Y - ; I _ - C WOOD PRIVAC4ENCE 1. I I 1T I' . a FL -FL LJ D SD 1 lr B- '✓T _ 1 SETBACK 0 H Nl I ~I awo,WwlM ~(/I !AI 1. ~ db~ 3JS nJ bWi REA3 /Lawsc if aan9. ~it~m R t i 3M 4 i , 1 ORAINACE EASEMENT B 1 BLOCK: a / I " D IC +AOT11 IARIPS 1. 1] ACRES / ~'qSt aFx7"Epc✓ ZONED PID . . DETFpili011 -P FAILITiES' EkIYING USE INDUSTRIAL ZONED: VUD-I - DT (NAINTENANCE BY INDIVIDVA OWNER) Y m IIIAT E cE INTERIM EDMG TO B P TIDED T -^-NONIRRIGATEP- LANDSCAPEIMPROVEMENTS BYDNDAR LINE _ PER ObE4L0i "?A NC AT TIME OF DEVELOPMENT OF. I } r- CONTROL. PLAN) LIGHTINDUSTRIAL THIS AREA SUBJECT TO I I I SEPARATE FDP Y LLLL us 111 3x00 WATER EASEMENT (To B PARTALLY ABAN0oNE0) PEf 9O. F1200]29) LANDSCAPEIMPROVEMENTS . . 1 AT TIME OF DEVELOPMENT OF -•LL j LIGHT INDUSTRIAL . l.C& 35,00 NEPAL i DRAINAGE EASEMENT - 22 oo iI - C0LU k~ oe ~5S EDP-EGc i 5' DETACHED WALK 2200' PJNRE L-FL (RI OTHER i / CON TOY PA TA NELOU" SCLTI FAIL IT, 5E CON .T F i0 tel. BY OThEPS - pka A 12 WEStERN +#Ar.W6eP-2Y TREES AwNe _ _ RIDSE RoAP ARE To 9E 5~ LAUPBR~- LIMIT OF GRADING ZOII D Al, AGRICULTURAL CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE UNDISTURBED xlsrnc CL c~-EON PERIMETER FENCE o BRICKCOLUMN TRANSITIONAL FENCE . - THREE RAIL FENCE l I WOOD PRIVACY FENCE O DECIDUOUS TREE O ORNAMENTALTREE DECIDUOUS SHRUB O EVERGREEN TREE EVERGREEN SHRUB ORNAMENTAL GRASSES D GRASSSEEDATIVE PERENNIALS AND GROUND COVERS FESCUE D 13L BLUE GRASS SOD NON IRRIGATED NATIVE D OR FROM~BLE H M O C O L MATC FILING 1 AREA REMAIN UNDISTURBED AREAT THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE mmor" NORR[S DULLFA PlIlnnin Ialltlr ,ftiinecpve 110WaACOOaxAarue Datum.C ,I, Bm FU 300002.1106 Plwne303.892.1166 rrxr.rimistluYee.mm SHEET 14 OF 14 1151W 814),S-APPEP 8'GAUYER Ndr rvK WHO CI(YI IMP FCTATFS Fit INR NO 3 FnP SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 3 OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE A PART OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO COVER d E u N r m rv Q 0o Oo a~ apM-oo dwwzw ~ ~ LL 0 ooo~o a o_zmF G ALL THAT PART OF THE NEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF ME NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF ME 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO, LYING NORTH OF TIE COUNTY ROAD KNOWN AS RIDGE ROAD, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 16, THENCE NORTH MY it' WEST, ON AND ALONG ME WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4. A DISTANCE OF 71.25 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY UNE OF RIDGE ROAD, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORM 0013. 11' WEST ON AND ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAD NORTHEAST 1/4, A DISTANCE OF 1246.20 FEET TO TIE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4; THENCE NORTH 89.35' 34' EAST, ON AND ALONG TIE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF TIE NORTHEAST 1/4, A DISTANCE OF 665.06 FEET TO TIE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID WEST 1/2 OF ME SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF ME NORTHEAST 1/4; THENCE SOUTH 0012' 59' EAST. ON AND ALONG ME EAST LINE OF SAD WEST 1/2 OF ME SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF ME NORTHEAST 1/4, A DISTANCE OF 1068.47 FEET TO A PUNT ON ME NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID RIDGE ROAD, THENCE SOUTH 74'38'30' WEST, ON AND ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY UNE. A DISTANCE OF 68B.9D FEET MORE OR LESS TO ME PUNT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 769,656 SQUARE FEET (17.67 ACRES) MORE OR LESS. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: I, GEORGE G. SMITH. JR., A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR IN ME STATE OF COLORADO. DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ME SURVEY FOR SKYLINE ESTATES RUNG NO. 3 WAS MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND ME ACCOMPANYING PLAN ACCURATELY AND PROPERLY SHOWS SAID SURVEY. GEORGE G. SMITH. JR. DATE P.LS. NO. 19003 OWNER'S CERTIFICATION: ME BELOW-SIGNED OWNER(S), OR LEGALLY DESIGNATED AGENT(S) THEREOF. DO HEREBY AGREE THAT ME PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED HEREON WILL BE DEVELOPED AS A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT M ACCORDANCE WITH ME USES, RESTRICTIONS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED IN MIS PUN, AND AS MAY OTHERWSE BE REQUIRED BY LAW. I (WE) NRTHER RECOGNIZE THAT ME APPROVAL OF REZONING TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. AND APPROVAL OF MIS OUTUNE DEVELOPMENT PLAN DOES NOT CREATE A VESTED PROPERTY RIGHT. VESTED PROPERTY RIGHTS MAY ONLY ARISE AND ACCRUE PURSUANT TO ME PROMMONS OF SECTON 26-121 OF ME WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS SIGNATURE OF OWNER(S) OR AGENT(S) NOTARY PUBLIC: SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN BEFORE ME THIS-DAY OF 20- WIMESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL MY COMMISSION EXPIRES CASE HISTORY: WZ-02-13 WS-02-O1 SCHEDULE: ME PROJECT WiLL HAYS TWO PHASES OF BUILD OUT. THE FIRST PHASE WILL COMPRISE ALL RESIDENTAL LOTS AND NECESSARY IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS OF CORE, GUTTER, SIDEWALK, AND TREE LAWN, INCLUDING RIDGE ROAD. ME SECOND PHASE WILL INCLUDE ONLY ME INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY PROPER. ANTICIPATED TWO-YEAR BUILD OUT OF RESIDENTIAL PHASE UPON FINAL CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE APPROVAL PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL MIS-DAY OF 20- BY THE WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION. CHAIRPERSON OWNERSHIP /UNIFIED CONTROL STATEMENT: OWNERSHIP AND MANTENANCE OF INDIVIDUAL PROPERTIES SHALL BY THE RESPONSIBIUTY OF TIE INDIVIDUAL HOMEOWNER. THE HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION WILL ENFORCE THE REGULATONS AS RECORDED IN THE MASTER DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS. RIGHTS-OF-WAYS IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO PLATTED PROPERTIES SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF ME PROPERTY OWNER. RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE 35' DRAINAGE EASEMENT (COLUMBINE BASIN) SHALL BE WiTi ME PROPERTY OWNER. PHASING, CHARACTER, OWNERSHIP, AND MAINTENANCE OF OPEN SPACE IS DESCRIBED M ME FOLLOWING TABLE TRACT B RESDENTAL SOD TRACT C RESIDENTIAL SOD TRACT D RESIDENTIAL SOD TRACT E RETDENTIAL SOD TRACT F RESIDENTIAL SOD TRACT G RESIDENTIAL SOD TRACT H RESIDENTIAL NATIVE NON-IRRIGATED RIDGE RD. RESIDENTAL SOD ROW 54TH ROW RESIDENTIAL SOD 35' DRAINAGE RESIDENTIAL NATIVE EASEMENT CITY CERTIFICATION: APPROVED MISLAY OF 2D- BY ME WHEAT RIDGE CITY COUNCIL DRAINAGE/ HOA HOA DETENTION ATTEST LANDSCAPING HDA HOA LANDSCAPING HOA HOA CITY CLERK MAYOR LANDSCAPING HOA HDA LANDSCAPING HOA HOA LANDSCAPING HOA HOA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR LANDSCAPING HDA HOA DRAINAGE/ HOA/INDUSTRIAL HOA/INDUSTRIAL DETENTION LANDSCAPING WHEAT RIDGE HOA/INDUSTRIAL LANDSCAPING ARVADA HOA DRAINAGE PROPERTY HOA/iNDUSVIAL OWNER COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDERS CERTIFICATE: THIS DOCUMENT ACCEPTED FOR RUNG IN ME OFFICE OF ME COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER OF JEFFERSON COUNTY AT GOLDEN, COLORADO, ON ME DAY OF 2D- AD., IN BOOK- PAGE- RECEPTION ND. JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER BY;_ DEPUTY CHARACTER OF DEVELOPMENT: DUALITY HOUSING WITH HOMES INCLUDING, RANCH TWO STORY DOMINANT HOUSING. SHEET INDEX: 1 COVER SHEET 2 NOTES 3 PLAN PLAN IS CONSISTENT WM AND SIMILAR TO ME NEIGHBORING SKYLINE NO. 2 COMMUNITIES. ME ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS INCLUDED GENERAL DESIGN.. STYLE AND QUALITY OF HOMES TO BE COMMUNITY. ME INTENT OF ME COMMUNITY IS TO PROVIDE W fivl MIDI" CONSULTING ENGINEERS xm sm. ~ 6MCM ImpmRsa-mo nxImp mR. mmAAG won min a¢ PREPARED FOR 0MElDBY930- 11031 SHERIDAN BLVD. WESTMINSTER, COLORADO 00020 PHONE (303)-466-iB31 FAX: (303)-466-1636 SHEET 1 OF 3 SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 3 ODP VICINITY MAP SCALE 1'- 1200 Ti E F- 0 ,a tia oN Oo Om O x nFw¢zw aOLL~O ~x3LL 0 ooo~o a a'zof S'ri','.YLINE ESTATES FILING NO, 3 OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE A PART OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO NOTES PERMITTED USES: PRO RMIDFNTAI 70NING SINGLE-FAMILY DWEWNGS. CUSTOMARY ACCESSORY STRUCTURES SUCH AS DETACHED GARAGES AND STORAGE SHEDS AND CUSTOMARY ANCILLARY USES. PID (INDUSTRIAL) ZONING 1. ANIMAL VETERINARY HOSPITALS AND CLINICS (NO CREMATION) Z. ANTIQUE STORES 3. APPAREL AND ACCESSORY STORES 4. APPLIANCE STORES (INCLUDING INCIDENTAL SERVICE AND REPAIRS) 5. BAKERIES, RETAJL 6. BANKS. LOAN AND FINANCE OFFICERS 7. BICYCLE STORES 8- BLUEPRINTING, PHOTOSTATIC COPYING AND OTHER SIMILAR REPRODUCTION SERVICES 9. BOOK STORES NEWSSTMOS. STATIONERY AND CARD STORES 10. USAGE TYPE DELETED 11. BUTCHER SHOPS, INCLUDING MEAT, POULTRY OR SEAFOOD STORES 12 CABINET AND WOODWORKING SHOPS 13. CAMERA AND PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICE AND SUPPLY STORES 14. CATERERS 15. DEPARTMENT OR VARIETY STORES i6. DRUG STORES 17. EATING ESTABLISHMENTS, SIT DOWN 18. USAGE TYPE DELETED 19. USAGE TYPE DELETED 20. FLORAL SHOPS 21. FURNITURE STORES 22 GARDEN SUPPLY STORES 23 GIFT, NOVELTY OR SQUV4TR STORES 24. GREENHOUSES AND LANDSCAPE NURSERIES 25. GROCERY OR CONVENIENCE STORES, NO GASOLINE PUMPS 26. HAIR, NAIL AND COSMETIC SERVICES 27. HARDWARE STORES 28. HOBBY AND CRAFT STORES 29. HOME FURNISHING STORES 30. HOME IMPROWNEUT SUPPLY STORES INCLUDES INTERIOR DECORATING 31. JEWELRY STORES 32 LAUNDRY AND DRY CLEANING SHOPS 33. LEATHER GOODS AND LUGGAGE STORES 34. LINEN SUPPLY 35. LIQUOR STORES 36. LOCKSMITH 37. USAGE TYPE DELETED 3& USAGE TYPE DELETED 39. MEDICAL AND DENTAL OFFICES OR TUNICS 40. MUSIC STORES 41. OFFICE SUPPLY STORES 42. OFFICES GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE, BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL WFlCES 43. OPTICAL STORES 44. PAINT AND WALLPAPER STORES q5. PET STORES 46. PHARMACIES 47. PICTURE FRAMING SHOPS 48. USAGE TYPE DELETED 49. SHOE REPAIR AND SALES SHOPS 50. SHOPS FOR CUSTOM WORK OR FOR MAKING ARTICLES, MATERIALS OR COMMODITIES TO BE SOLD AT RETAIL ON THE PREMISES 51. SPORTING GOODS STORES 52 STUDIO FOR PROFESSIONAL WORK OR TEACHING W FINE ARTS. PHOTOGRAPHY, MUSIC, DRAMA OR DANCE 53. TAILOR, DRESSMAKING OR CLOTHING ALTERATION SHOPS 54. TELEVISION. RADIO, SMALL APPLIANCE OR COMPUTER REPAIR AND SERVICE SHOPS 55. TOBACCO STORES 56. TOY STORES 57. VIDEO RENTALS 58. WAREHOUSE/OFFICE (MAXIMUM 75% TOTAL AREA AS WAREHOUSE) 59. SIMILAR USES AS DETERMINED BY THE DIRECTOR W COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 26-307 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS CASE HISTORY: VIZ-02-13 WS-02-O1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS HEM INDUSTRIAL RESCENTAL MAXIMUMLOTWWRAGE W% BULDENSAND HRDSCAPE '10% BUILDING' COVERAGE WVERME REFER TO SECTION 26502 OF THE LANDSCAPING MINIMUM 20% WHEAT RIWE MME OF LAWS MINIMUMSETBACKS FRONT WFEET 20FEET SIDE 5FEETPERSTORY• 75 FEET 10 FEET FOR A ME STORY REAR WILDNG,PLUSANADMKYJAL 10 FEET FINE FEET PER STORY' 'FAOW~'TTOA OSfATHIR3RLF - vav, neanMM ~lenal<smrm : FAlvomrtm~ Tmlmnu Vi4Y.ANMML£Ib,(%624 REFERTOSECTIXJ3S5030FTHE REFER M SECTION 265030F THE LGFmNu„ WHEAT RIDGE ROUE CF IAWS WHEAT RIDGE CODS OF TAWS REFER TO SECIDM2 501 OF THE REFER TO SECIIM 26501 OF THE PARKING WHEAT RIDGE CONE OF LAWS WHEAT RIDGE CODE W LAWS AS APPROVED ON THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND N ARCHRECNRE ACQMD4NC£ WIH THE AS APPROVED ON THE FINAL STREETSCAPEAND DEVELOPMENTPLAN PRWHTCTURPLDEWCWMMUAL ACCESS ACCESS IXSY FROM OAK STREET REFER M ARM-E VII CF THE REFERTOMMIEVIICFTE SMACE WHEAT RICE CME OF LAWS WHEAT RIDGE CODE CF LAWS FENCING AND SICM F£fER TO SECTNNJ 269M OF TE REFERTOSECTK1 26W3CFTHE DISTANCE TRUWGI£ WHEAT RIDGE CCCE OF LAWS WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS REFERTOSECTION26204CFTHE ACCESSORY BUIONGS WHEAT RIME CODE 6 LAWS 35 FEET SvJ3.E FAMLT LV M MINIMUM HEIGHT 35 FEET - U FEET, OEiaomGewO6 oR6H]l M1OUMRAThMPRMICEDPII MINIMUMLCTSIZE OTHER REQUIREMENTS CAN BE TSOD SO FT. MET NOLIMRATMPROVIGEDNI MINIMUM LOTWIOH I OTTER REQUIREMENTS CAN SE QA FT AT FRONTAGE MET 650 FT ATSETBACH MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS MAY BE FURTHER DEFINED IN THE RESIDENTIAL AND INDUSTRIAL STANDARDS TANDAR 1. HOMES IN THE SKYLINE 3 COMMUNITY SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE ELEVATIWS INCLUDED ON THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. OVERALL FACADE AND ARCHITECTURE SHALL CONFORM TO THE PLANS INCLUDED IN THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. 2. RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES W LOTS ADJACENT TO OPEN SPACE TRACTS SHALL INCLUDE, ON THE SIDE ADJACENT TO THE TRACT, THE SAME ENHANCEMENTS REQUIRED FOR STRUCTURES W CORNER LOTS 3 RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES W CORNER LOTS SHALL HAVE ALONG THE SIDE OF THE HOME A FOUR FOOT RETURN OF DECORATIVE WAINSCOTING TREATMENT OF EITHER BRICK OR STONE, TWO WINDOWS, TRIM BOARD ENHANCEMENTS VARIATION IN SIDING MATERIAL, AND ALL MSIBIE SIDE YARDS SHALL HAVE PRIVACY FENCE TO HELP SCREEN AND BREAK UP THE SIDE PLANE OF THE HOME. OVERALL FACADE AND ARCHITECTURE SHALL CONFORM TO THE PLANS INCLUDED IN THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. 4. THE FRONT SETBACK SHALL VARY A MINIMUM OF 25 FEET SO THAT NO MORE THAN ONE-THIRD W ANY STREET FRONTAGE SHALL HAVE HOMES WITH SETBACKS W 20 FEET, 22.5 FEET, AND 25 FEET. NO THREE ADJACENT STRUCTURES SHALL HAYS THE SAME FRONT SETBACK. 5. NO TWO SIMILAR STRUCTURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH THE SAME ELEVATION ON ADJACENT LOTS OR LOTS ACROSS THE STREET. THERE SHALL NOT BE TWO GARAGE DOMINANT MODELS CONSTRUCTED W ADJACENT LOTS. 6. ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES SUCH AS CORNICES, EAW BMTCOURSES, BAY WINDOWS, SILLS CANOPIES PORCHES, DECKS, PATIOS, AND BALCONIES MAY EXTEND OR PROJECT INTO A REWIRED SETBACK A MAXMUM OF THIRTY INCHES. 7. THE FIRST MOOR W ME FRONT ELEVATION OF THE HOME SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 50% BRICK OR STONE WITH A FOUR-FOOT RETURN ON EITHER SIDE OF THE HOME W DECORATIVE WAINSCOTING. INDUSTRIAL STANDARDS: 1. BUFFERING OF INDUSTRIAL AREAS: WHENEVER A PARKING LOT IS PLACED BETWEEN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AND TIME STRUCTURE(S), A SCREENING OF THE PARKING AREA SHALL BE ESTABLISHED BETWEEN THE RIGHT-W-WAY AND THE PARKING AREA THIS MEW-OBSCURING SCREEN SHALL BE COMPOSED OF UW PLANTINGS, BERMS. FENCES, WALLS OR A COMBINATION THEREOF THE HDGHT OF THE SCREENING WILL BE SUBJECT TD THE SIGHT DISTANCE TRIANGLE REQUIREMENTS AS SUNNED ON THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. 2 OUTDOOR STORAGE FOR THE INDUSTRIAL LOT: OUTDCOR STORAGE ASSOCIATED WITH THE PRIMARY USE OF ME INDUSTRIAL LOT 15 ALLOWED AS AN ACCESSORY USE WHEN EXPLICITLY IDENTIFIED ON AN APPROVED FINAL DEWLOPMNT PLAN. THE MATERIALS TO BE STORED MUST BE SCREENED BY A SIX-FOOT, NEW-OBSCURING FENCE WALL. OR LANDSCAPING WHICH FULLY CONCEALS SUCH FACILITES MGM ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND PUBUC STREETS. THE HOGHT W PINY STORAGE MATERIALS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE HDGHT OF THE FENCE 3 ARCHITECTURAL FINISHES SHALL INCLUDE EXTERIOR MATERIALS W BRICK. STONE, MOD. AND GLASS BUILDING FACADE TREATMENT SHALL INCLUDE ELEMENTS THAT PROVIDE A HUMAN SCALE. CREATE TEXTURE AND RELIEF. AND INCORPORATE ARCHITECTURAL FENESTRATION AND ARTICULATION. METAL BUILDINGS ARE PROHIBITED. 4. EVERY INDUSTRIAL USE SHALL BE OPERATED IN ITS ENTIRETY WITHIN A COMPLETELY ENCLOSED BUILDING WITH THE EXCEPTION OF OUTDOOR STORAGE AREAS IDENTIFIED ON AN APPROVED FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. 5. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 26-505. INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. M M v,Ni MICHAEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS NKIL (Wj eFDD f1t 0011 m4ffi[ PREPARED FOR o ME(DUYHOMBS- 11031 SHERIDAN BLVD. WESTMINSTER, COLORADO 80020 PHONE (303)-466-1831 FAX: (303)-466-1838 STATISTICAL INFORMATION TOTAL SITE AREA: 17.67 ACRES 769,655.51 SO FT ZONING PRD: 14.49 ACRES 630920.76 SO FT ZONING Plp: MIS ACRES 138,734.75 50 FT NUMBER OF DWEIIINC UNITS: 37 LOTS DWEWNG UNITS PER ACRE (GROSS, 17.67 ACRES}. 209 DU/AC DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE (NET, 14.49 ACRES), 2.55 DU/AC OPEN SPACE REQUIRED [2 % OF PRO ZONING), 3.62 ACRES 157,730.19 SO FT OPEN SPACE PROVIDED: 4.79 ACRES 20&189.86 SO FT AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 0.25 ACRES 11,871.92 SO FT RIGHT-W-WAY-DEDICATION: 3.24 ACRES 141.154.36 SO FT TRACT INFORMATION TRACT A HOA DRAINAGE, OPEN SPACE, IRRIGATION 2.72 ACRES 118.689.32 SO FT TRACT B HOA OPEN SPACE 0.07 ACRES 3.039.78 SO FT TRACT C HOA OPEN SPACE 0.21 ACRES 91298.91 SO FT TRACT D HOA OPEN SPACE. IRRIGATION 0.06 ACRES 2,400.00 50 FT TRACT E FDA OPEN SPACE 0.20 ACRES 8,549.75 SO FT TRACT F HOA OPEN SPACE 0.22 ACRES 9.697.03 SO FT TRACT C HOA WEN SPACE, IRRIGATION 0.55 ACRES 23,969.16 SO FT TRACT H HOA ORAINAGE,OPEN SPACE 0.78 ACRES 34,003.35 SO FT LOT INFORMATION PRO ZONING: BLOCK 1 LOTS 1-12 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 269 ACRES 117,24322 SO FT BLOCK 2 LOTS 1-13 SINGLE FAMILY RMDENTAL 2.49 ACRES 10&414.21 SO FT BLOCK 3 LOTS 1-12 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 2.43 ACRES 106,05&10 SO FT PID ZWING: BLOW 5 LOT i COMMERCAL/INDUSRIAL 2.01 ACRES 87,731.34 SO FT LEGEND: - - PROPOSED BOUNDARY UNE PROPOSED R.O.W. PROPOSED LOT UNE PROPOSED MOWUNE - PROPOSED CENTERLINE - - - - - - - - - PROPOSED SETBACK - - - - - - - - PROPOSED UTILITY ESMT. PROPOSED IRRIGATION ESMT. PROPOSED LANDSCAPE ESMT. 5445 PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR • - - PROPOSED IRRIGATION DRAIN PROPOSED WATER UNE - PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED LOT NUMBER u' PROPOSED BLOCK NUMBER # PROPOSED STREET LIGHT EXISTING R.O.W. EXISTNG EOA - - EXISTING FLOW UNE - - ~44Q- - - - - EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR >t EXISTING FENCE -OHE OHE- EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC -x EXISTING TREES 77/-/77/~ CITY UNITS ZONING LIMITS SHEET 2 OF 3 SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 3 ODP c oa oQ ~Q ¢30 SkYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 3 OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE A PART OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO I i I I, I° I II - „ / - v i E%15TIflG Piz Fj 3oWLL DETOI POND II I O1Zz i~u A ~w o 27. 70 ACREB - I ~I !36. I R tg NLL MOVEMENT I Ji. L _ I IIi ,n S.^ i -z N uTV-_. 1 YS _ - - III ExlsnNc / I II ti o 3 I SMACK I it I N J EASEMENT FOR \ TRACT EAR CUSS ACRES 1 II $~w' III . 1 II} d DRNNAOE 1ND OE1FN110N O~ SETBACK s0 I .50 V ROIADNG \ ~z / SETBACI I r-- ~ I I II I 11 I~I II III F---~ t~ !1 10.0o I zioD 7.50' I I I I I SIDE I I o3 !'I SIDE II I II 1 I I I I I s(,TBACK ° o a-R LOT (NORTH SIDE - SETBACK I I 6.w.- II " It II LA or ' I I \ A It INZOI ACRES NDSCAPWG I 201 \ LJ _ J50 W' JI IL JI L J ZONED C DES L wJl L J L JI 'z I \ \ R L -4 L -LILT-- L - L L - I - I -NEWCOI, I \ 20.06 rI-~ FRONT r - 1 r- - 1 r - - r - - PROPOSED SETBACK IF 11 II 11 I~ I I~ OW E II II 111 111 IIII ~ E ISTING _ 5i U(7k - 50.00' R.O. W r St c 11 II II 1 II 11 I II I It s 1 11 rn ree N 001311 W 1246.201 1 - - ` - / _ - - - - a - I C4) EA E u UTY S u "9 I r I I EXIS (TO B TING WATER TER E t PARTIAuy ASEMENT NED 1 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LIMITS \ Y 44 REG . NO F12 y 072 9) - - k- ~ I I i I ,I it i!II / / IMy I s} PROPERTY BWNDARY I I'' °W\ 5 00'12'59" E 1068.47 _ _ - ~ RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR - - REM ` \ REAR . EXISTING NG DRAINAGE- - _ _ - - - - - CHANNEL AND SETBACK DETENTION FACNtt \ \ \ 2000 Ill ijl ~I II o II II II II II II 11 II « 11 2n"ACRES TSETBBACK' I I I I eRw 1 I 1 II II II It 1 I SIDEWA \ PROPOSED 20.00 IRRIGATION EASEMENT\ 11 I( JI IIL II I _ EASEMENT =~JL _ ~L-~f JCL -~LSJJL= ~L I 1\ \ \ \ 50.00'-m °R°• \ 50.00' 320 ' _ - -NELSON STREET-' - - - .O. W. R.O.W. IAOYE FU T \ li it \ _ ~I Ir ~I Ir~ 11 IF _ 11 IF 11 ACCESS I UMUTOY o. 9AACRES \ J L- , , / \ \ I PROPOSED 20.00' II II 2000' .II III I 2 IRRIGATION EASEMENT FRONT I EASEMENT \ \ - - ¢ oo• SIDEWALK BEET- 320 FF ra 60.00' n n ZONED PID 'Lc, 316 ACRES EASEMENT \ u' I (REQUIRES SEPERATE \ 3 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN) \ \ ' r \ PROPOSED 20.00 IRRIGATION EASEMENT 11 II 11 DRAINAGE EASEMENT \ \ IL 111 1 11 it II LANDSCA PING 1 \ (WIDTH VARIES) \ II ~ dl ll ~ I I ~ 1 ~ \ \ I II 17- ACRES A 0,20 I \ ~~~TTT OAK SIREEi -I = GI &0'PR01'OSED LMTY EjSEMENT ~ 5. L \ \ \ < \ - - - - - EXIsTIG 30.01 NG ~ ® 'E ST i i y-- \ \ 1 \ WATER EASEMS Y AS' (TO BE PARTIALL XI I RwO- JU , \ , , \ \ (REC. ND. F120D; , IRRIGAi1W1 HCH-- 7 sI`\ PROJECT sin 6400 R.O.W. 23.50' IG EOP-ECP i\ \ I\3 ,a \ KEYMAP µTS I-- 60 0 60 120 ORIGNAL SCALE 1'=6D' NOTES, i. TINS PRWERtt LES WITHIN ZONE C. DESIGNATED AS AREAS OF MINIMAL FLOODING. ACCORDING TO FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY ROOD INSURANCE RATE MAP. COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 005079-00°5 C. RENSED FEBRUARY 4. 1998. SHEET 3 OF 3 SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 3 ODP P~v F L 0 % Q O o ~11~. o 2ygbn ' 1Jh\ay~ Board of Directors Executive Committee: Beverly Bradshaw Chairman City of Englewood Debra Vickrey Chairman Pro-Tern Arapahoe County Paul Danish Secretary Boulder County Gretchen Cerveny Treasurer City of Wheat Ridge Elaine Valente Member at Large Adams County Members: Steve Burkholder City of Lakewood Noel Busck City of Thornton Ken Fellman City of Arvada Stephanie Foote City/County of Denver B. H. Hofimaster Engineer Michelle Lawrence Jefferson County Kathleen MacKenzie City/County of Denver W. Mike Maxwell Douglas County Bart Miller City of Centennial Deborah Ortega City/County of Denver Art Patton Engineer Cathy Reynolds City/County of Denver Susan Spence Town of Superior Karen Stuart City/County of Broomfield Ed Tauer City of Aurora L. Scott Tucker, Executive Director August 11, 2003 David F. Brossman, P.L.S. 71 City of Wheat Ridge o Development Review Engineer 7500 West 29th Avenue ° Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 a z Dear Mr. Brossman This letter is in response to your request for our comments concerning the "Final Drainage Report for Skyline Estates Filing No. 3" revised July, 2003. We appreciate the opportunity to review this report. We have reviewed the drainage report only as it relates to major drainageways and District master plans, in this case "Outfall Systems Planning, Columbine Basin" (OSP) dated December, 1994. We have the following comments to offer: I. As indicated in the drainage report, I did meet with representatives of Kirkham Michael and indicated that if current conditions had changed from those indicated in the OSP, then they should use current conditions. The drainage report utilizes different conditions but does not adequately define why the tributary areas are so much less than those in the OSP. If they are, fine. _ However, I cannot tell why they are different. 2. The design discharge for the Ridge Home Tributary is given as 96.5-cfs. That does not match any of the discharges provided in the tables provided on pages 6 and 7, so I do not know where that number came from. 3. For some reason, fewer and fewer drainage engineers provide profiles of their proposed projects. This makes it almost impossible to determine if the project will be able to transition into the existing system upstream and downstream from the proposed facilities. Please provide a profile to demonstrate transitions into and out of the proposed facilities. flooftill4heatridge 4. The drainage report indicates that a homeowners association will be responsible for maintenance of the drainage facilities. If you are contemplating submitting this facility for District maintenance eligibility, you should be aware that, although ownership can rest with a homeowners association, a public entity, such as the City of Wheat Ridge, should have maintenance responsibility through at least a drainage easement and the ability to enter the site and perform maintenance if required. Continuous maintenance access is also a requirement, and it is not clear if that is provided in this case. If you have any questions concerning these comments, please contact me. Sincerely, B 11 Bill WDe I root, Chief, Foodplain Management Program WGD/mc Oooftilhwheatridge NN KIRKHAM MICHAEL Arizona • Colorado Iowa • Kansas • Nebraska CONSULTING ENGINEERS www.kirkham.com August 8, 2003 Mr. David F. Brossman, PLS Development Review Engineer City of Wheat Ridge 7500 West 29" Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 RE: Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 Response to August 4, 2003 Technical Review Comments Dear Dave: Kirkham Michael (KM) has prepared the following response to address the comments of your August 4, 2003 letter relating to the: • Final Drainage Report; • Grading and Erosion Control Plan: • Final Development Plan; and • Final Plat. We understand further comments may be forthcoming relating to: • Storm Sewer Plans; and • Street Construction Plans This response follows the format of your comments and the following is being submitted with this response: 1. Red-lined plats and report comments; 2. Final Drainage Report (2 sets); 3. Grading and Erosion Control Plan (2 sets); 4. Final Development Plan (2 sets); and 5. Final Plat (2 sets). DRAINAGE REPORT (Discussion) 1. It is our understanding from Mr. Bill DeGroot of the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD) that the City has given him direction that he has until August 21, 2003 to respond. Should UDFCD have any comments at that time, KM will address them expeditiously. 2. Please see paragraph 4 in sub-section "Columbine Basin" in the Final Drainage Report. 3. Please see sub-section "Underdrain System" in the Final Drainage Report. 4. In our previous response, both the letter and Final Drainage Report were incorrect. The correct number of sub-basins is 19 and the total area is 19.25 acres. 5600 South Quebec Street • Suite 200 D • Greenwood Village, CO 80111 • (303) 694-2300 • FAX (303) 694-2822 ass Page 2 of 3 5. Submitted copy has been signed and sealed by a PE licensed in the State of Colorado. DRAINAGE REPORT 1. An additional map has been added to the appendix showing the underdrain system. DRAINAGE PLAN I. A map showing the overland flow route east of Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 has been added to the appendix of the Final Drainage Report. 2. Please see paragraph 4 in sub-section "Columbine Basin" in the Final Drainage Report. 3. Cross-sections D-D and E-E have been correctly placed and detailed. 4. The low-flow trickle channel has been modified to include a v-type bottom. 5. Submitted copy has been signed and sealed by a PE licensed in the State of Colorado. GRADING AND EROISION CONTROL PLAN 1. KM has reverted back to the grading concepts shown on the previous submittal for the area east of Skyline estates Filing No. 3. 2. The words "irrigation ditch and/or" have been inserted into note 5. 3. A location arrow has been added to the Inlet Protection Detail. 4. "Aurora" has been replaced by "Wheat Ridge" on note 19. SURVEYING COMMENTS Final Plat 1. The drainage easement containing the outfall from Skyline estates Filing No. 2 has been enlarged. 2. The square footages for all tracts have been added to the Tract Designation Table. Square footage for the industrial lot has been shown on that lot. Final Development Plan 1. The square footages for all tracts have been added to the Tract Designation Table. Square footage for the industrial lot has been shown on that lot. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING These comments have previously been addressed with Mr. Steve Nguyen. PE. Although we halve no written documentation, it is our understanding that he has accepted our response and approved the Traffic Impact Study. DRAINAGE REPORT Although we have no written documentation, it is our understanding that these comments were successfully addressed with our July 9, 2003 response package. MN Page 3 of 3 We trust this response plus the attached plans and reports will allow for your approval same. Should there be any additional concerns, please contact either myself at 303-694-2300 ext. 320, or Darrel Pennington of Melody Homes Inc. at 303-785-4035. KIRKHAM MICHAEL Wit. Curtis Archdeacon PE. PLS Division Manager Colorado Land Development Cc: Darrel Pennington, Melody Homes Katie Christopher, Kirkham Michael KM File M0203120 f"*a caa PUBLIC HEARINGS ,m A. Case No. WZ-02-13 (continued from July 17,2003): An application filed by Melody Homes, Inc. for approval of a Planned Residential Development final development plan for property located at 10285 Ridge Road. B. Case No. WS-02-01 (continued from July 17,2003): An application filed by Melody Homes, Inc. for approval of a 38-lot subdivision plat for property located at 10285 Ridge Road. L It was moved by Commissioner DAVIS and seconded by Commissioner PLUMMER to continue Case No. WZ-02-13 and Case No. WS-02-01 to the meeting of August 21, 2003. The motion passed 8-0. C. Case No. MS-03-04: An application filed by Todd Youngblood for approval of a two- lot minor subdivision plat for property zoned Commercial-One and located at 4470 Wadsworth Boulevard. This case was presented by Mary Austin. She entered all pertinent documents into the record and advised the Commission there was jurisdiction to hear the case. She reviewed the staff report and digital presentation. Staff recommended approval for reasons outlined in the staff report. In response to questions from Commissioner McMILLIN, Ms. Austin stated that, not knowing what type of business would be located there, it would be very difficult to estimate possible increase in traffic on W. 456. Furthermore, primary access to the subject property could potentially come from Wadsworth. The developer is looking at doing an access easement across lot one as part of the purchase negotiations. Lot four will have a W. 45`s Avenue address. Commissioner BERRY expressed concern about the curb cut onto W. 45`s allowing traffic to flow into the neighborhood and recommended left turn only. Ms. Austin stated that a recommendation could be made to the traffic engineer. Depending on the use of the site, the traffic engineer would decide whether or not a traffic study is warranted. Todd Youngblood 4470 Wadsworth Boulevard Mr. Youngblood, the applicant, was sworn in by Chair McNAMEE. He stated he had nothing to add to the staff report as presented by Ms. Austin. Jim Templeton 4551 Vance Mr. Templeton was sworn in by Chair McNAMEE. He voiced concern about the possibility of increased traffic on Vance. He would like to see traffic routed onto Wadsworth. Planning Commission Page 2 August 7, 2003 Bill DeGroot, 02:01 PM 8/5/2003, RE: Skyline Estates channel design Page 1 of 2 From: "Bill DeGroot" <bdegroot@udfcd.org> To: "'Dave Brossman"' <daveb@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Cc: "'Mary Austin'" <marya@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: RE: Skyline Estates channel design Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 15:01:51 -0600 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal Dave: I have received your voice mail and e-mail. I have been in meetings all day and have another one at 3:30. We will have comments to you before August 21. How much before will depend on what is in here ahead of your submittal and how good the drainage report is. Bill -----Original Message----- From: Dave Brossman [mailto:daveb@ci.wheatridge.co.us] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 2:14 PM To: bdegroot@udfcd.org Cc: Mary Austin Subject: Skyline Estates channel design Tuesday, August 05, 2003 Dear Mr.DeGroot, Hi, this is Dave Brossman, the Development Review Engineer with the City of Wheat Ridge. I left you a voice message this morning (Tuesday August 5th) regarding a Final Drainage Report that was prepared by and given to you by Kirkham Michael for the Skyline Estates Filing #3 (Melody Homes ) development. Skyline Filing #3 is located on the north side of Ridge Road, west of Miller Street. The gal that has dropped the report off to you, Katie Christopher, called me and said that typically Urban Drainage doesn't accept drainage reports/plans from anyone other than government entities, and wondered if I could contact you to request that UDFCD review the Columbine Channel design proposed by Kirkham Michael. The City of Wheat Ridge is requesting that Melody Homes obtain written approval from UDFCD, because the proposed drainage channel design deviates from the original Outfall Systems Planning for the Columbine Basin. While the submitted design basically adheres to Urban Drainage guidelines, due to Printed for Mary Austin <marya@ci.wheatridge.co.us> 9/8/2003 Bill DeGroot, 02:01 PM 8/5/2003, RE: Skyline Estates channel design Page 2 of 2 the fact that it does deviate from the Columbine Study, your approval will be a requirement of City approval. Written UDFCD approval is required before the City of Wheat Ridge will bring Melody's development before the Planning Commission hearing, currently set for Thursday, August 21st. At your earliest convenience, could you please give me a reply to this e-mail and your response. Sincerely, David F. Brossman, P.L.S. mailto:daveb@ci.wheatridge.co.us 303.235.2864 CC: Mary Austin, Planner File E-mail to Bill DeGroot (Skyline #3) Printed for Mary Austin <marya@ci.wheatridge.co.us> 9/8/2003 Dave Brossman, 06:43 AM 8/4/2003, Jerry Dahl's voice message Page 1 of 1 From: "Dave Brossman" <daveb@ci.wheatridge.co.us> To: "Mary Austin" <marya@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: Jerry Dahl's voice message Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 07:43:56 -0600 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Good Morning Mary, I thought I would keep you up to date as far as the Underdrain Agreement that Mr. Dahl was to write for Melody. Jerry stated in the voice message he left me on Friday afternoon that he wants to place in the Underdrain Agreement an extensive amount of insurance, indemnification, and maintenance language to protect the City of Wheat Ridge. Melody Homes (Steve Wilson) now feels that all of this may prove to be too costly, and is contemplating whether or not Melody wants to incur such costs. Steve Wilson told Jerry that Melody might seek to obtain an easement from the State to place the underdrain across the State land, and therefore staying out of the City ROW. Jerry said that of course this is up to Melody, and that the ball is now in their court to decide which way that Melody wishes to proceed. As I hear any further info I'll relay it to you. David F. Brossman, P.L.S. mailto:daveb@ci.wheatridge.co.us 303.235.2864 Printed for Mary Austin <marya@ci.wheatridge.co.us> 9/8/2003 ti Z4 41 l% @'' City of Wheat Rdge Depa ftw nt of Public Works August 4, 2003 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 Mr. William C. Archdeacon, P.E. Kirkham Michael Consulting Engineers 5600 South Quebec Street, Suite 200D Englewood, Colorado 80111 (303) 235-2868 FAX (303) 235-2857 Re: Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 - Third Review Comments of Final Drainage Report, Grading & Erosion Control Plan, Final Development Plan, and Final Plat Comments. Comments pertaining to the civil plans are not included in this letter. Comments for this review are limited to only the above- mentioned documents in an effort to have these documents in sufficient compliance as to be presentable to the City of Wheat Ridge Planning Commission. Please be advised that additional comments pertaining to the civil plans will be forthcoming. Dear Mr. Archdeacon, I have completed the third review of the above referenced documents for the Skyline Estates Subdivision received on June 16th (FDP & Plat), July 21 11 (G & EC), and July 291i (Drainage Report) and have the following comments: Drainage Report (Discussion) (Received July 29, 2003) 1. Written approval of the Columbine Basin Channel design as proposed by Kirkham Michael will need to be obtained from the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District by Melody Homes, and submitted to and approved by the City of Wheat Ridge. 2. Overtopping of any affected roadways will need to be discussed in the Final Drainage Report. The FDR states; "the flow rate at the Miller Street inlet is, after development, substantially the same as current historical flows." However, the FDR also shows calculations contrary to this statement. Per the FDR, the Current Historical Flow (for 5-year event) for the Actual Area is 16cfs, and the Post Development Flow is to be 50 cfs, which is 3.75 times the historical amount. The proposed additional flow that is to be released east of the Skyline Estates Filing #3 development may produce some roadway overtopping. (Please see page 7 of the FDR). 3. The proposed Underdrain System needs to be discussed in the Final Drainage Report. Whether or not the proposed Underdrain System is connected to the proposed storm sewer, the underdrain design and functionality will need to be discussed in the FDR. 4. Correct the number of Sub-basins to 18, and the total basin size to 18.99 acres (please see paragraph 1 under the Development Criteria, found on page 3) per the Kirkham Michael response letter dated July 28, 2003. 5. Please provide P.E. seal and signature on the final approved Report. Drainage Report (Appendix) (Received July 29, 2003) 1. The proposed Underdrain System needs to be discussed in the Final Drainage Report. Whether or not the proposed Underdrain System is connected to the proposed storm sewer, the underdrain design and functionality will need to be discussed in the FDR. Drainage Plan (Received July 29, 2003) 1. The overland flow route east of Skyline Estates Filing #3 needs to be shown on the Drainage Plan. 2. If any roadway over topping is expected, whether historical or as a result of this development, the area that this is expected to occur needs to be shown on the Plan. 3. Cross-section D-D as shown on Sheet 2 of the Drainage Plan corresponds to a cross-sectional view of the Columbine Basin channel east of Nelson Street. The D-D cross-section needs to be correctly shown on the plan view of Sheet 1. The cross-section D-D currently shown on the plan view of Sheet 2 (west of Oak Street) needs to be renamed as Cross-Section E-E, and needs to include the correct cross-sectional view for E-E. 4. The Columbine Low-Flow Channel Detail needs to include a v-type bottom as shown in Figure MD-7b of the UDFCD Urban Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual (please see attached sheet). 5. Please provide P.E. seal and signature on the final approved Drainage Plan. Public Works requires 2 signed and stamped sets of the Final Drainage Report and Plan. Please provide these with the next submittal. Grading & Erosion Control Plan (Received July 21, 2003) 1. The grading and erosion control required to complete the Columbine channel connection east of Skyline Filing #3 to the inlet at Miller Street will need to be included on the Plan. 2. Include the words "irrigation ditch and/or" into Note 5) as indicated on the redlined Plan. 3. On the Inlet Protection detail found on Sheet 3, add the location arrow for the wire screen on the detail 4. Please correct note #19 found on sheet 8 to read the City of Wheat Ridge (instead of Aurora). Surveying Comments (Received June 16, 2003) Final Plat Remarks: 1. Please double-check that the Drainage Easement running along the westerly lot line of Lot 1, Block 4 (Industrial Lot) is sufficient in size as to entirely encompass the storm sewer pipe, manhole, and outfall coming from the Skyline Estates Filing #2 development. 2. Please include the square footage and acreage for all Tracts, and Lot 1, Block 4 (Industrial Lot). Final Development Plan Remarks: (Received June 16, 2003) 1. Please include the square footage and acreage for all Tracts, and Lot 1, Block 4 (Industrial Lot). Storm Sewer Plans 1. Storm Sewer Plan comments are not included at this time. skyline_review3(Dmuiage-FDP-Plat).ltr Street Construction Drawings 1. Street Construction Drawing comments are not included at this time. Traffic Engineering A revised Traffic Impact Study has not been received at the time of this review letter. No new comments have been included with this letter. A copy of the previous (2nd submittal) street construction plans and traffic impact study had been forwarded to the City's Traffic Engineer, Mr. Steve Nguyen, P.E. (303-235-2862) for review and he had the following comments: Previous Comments: 1. The traffic impact study needs to be prepared and stamped by a Colorado Professional Engineer with experience in transportation engineering. 2. Oak Street is not physically connected or extended south of Ridge Road. Thus, traffic distribution and level of service may change at this and other nearby intersections. 3. The capacity summary tables (table 5 and 6) need to be clearly labeled for the intersections of Parfet, Nelson and Oak. 4. LOS for eastbound Ridge Road needs to be shown in Table 3, page 7. 5. It appears that the Parfet Street connection will not be implemented at this time, but rather sometime in the future. Please provide two traffic distribution scenarios, one with the Parfet Street connection as proposed in Skyline Filing #2 and one without. Capacity and level of service calculations for the street network will also need to be included in the report to reflect the above scenarios. Address any impact from the changes as necessary. 6. Please show the level of service in Highway Capacity Manual values in the calculation sheets. ICU level of service values are optional. Transportation Planning No new comments have been included with this letter. A copy of the previously submitted (2"d Review) street construction plans had been forwarded to the City's Transportation Planner, Mr. David Mentor (303-235-2866) for review and he had the following comments: Previous Comments: 1. Ridge Road is an identified streetscape corridor street and is subject to City Council's adopted Streetscaoe and Architectural Design Manual requirements. A copy of the Manual is available through the Planning Department for $10.00. 2. Please include information along Ridge Road that reflects the cross-section detail provided previously by the City Traffic Engineer. Various details related to the construction of curb, gutter, and detached sidewalk along Ridge Road are included in that cross section. (A copy of the cross section is attached). 3. In the treelawn, the developer shall install: Irrigation system. Turf (or other approved ground cover - see Streetscape Manual). Street trees @35' - 40' spacing; 3" caliper (see Streetscape Manual for approved varieties). skyline_review3(Drainage-FDP-Plat).ltr The Public Works Department requires 2 signed and stamped copies of the Traffic Impact Study, Storm Sewer Plans, Street Construction Plans, Grading & Erosion Control Plan, Final Development Plan, and Final Plat. Please provide these with the next submittal. Subdivision Improvement Agreement Upon City Council approval of the Final Plat, a Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) will need be executed by the project owner/developer. The City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Department will provide the SIA to the project owner/developer. Please note that there may be additions to this document for this development. Application for Minor Dumping/Landfill Permit Prior to the commencement of any onsite grading, an Application for Dumping/Landfill Permit, along with the fees due will need to be submitted for review and approval. This Permit is generally issued at the time of the Building Permit. Public Improvements Cost Estimate & Guarantee Prior to any construction commencing for the required public improvements within the right-of-way, an itemized engineer's cost estimate will need to be submitted for review and approval. Upon acceptance of this estimate, a letter of credit reflecting total costs of the approved cost estimate plus 25% will need to be submitted by the owner/developer for review and approval. Right-of-Way Construction Permit(s)/Licensing Prior to any construction of the public improvements, the necessary Right-of-Way construction permit(s) and respective licensing will need to be submitted for processing by the City. Right-of-Way Construction Permits are issued only after approval of all required technical documents, including but not limited to, the Final Drainage Report & Plan, Final Plat, Final Development Plan, Traffic Impact Study, Storm Sewer Plans, Street Construction Plans, Grading & Erosion Control Plan, and easement or ROW dedications. A signed acceptance letter from the ditch company will be required prior to the issuance of any building permits. Please return all redlined prints with the fourth submittal. Due to the amount and nature of the abovementioned revisions, additional comments and/or requirements may be forthcoming. If you have any questions, please contact me at 303-235-2864. Sincerely, .~~.~.--ice David F. Brossman, P.L.S. Development Review Engineer skyline_rev ew3(Dmmge-FDP-Plat).ltr CC: Alan White, Director of Community Development Steve Nguyen, Engineering Manager Dave Menter, Traffic Planner Mary Austin, Planner Darin Morgan, Code Administrator File(3) skyline_mview3(D raumge-FDP-Plat)]tr MAJOR DRAINAGE DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1) GRASSED CHANNEL WITH TRICKLE CHANNEL MINIMUM EASEMENT/ROW WIDTH 12' MIN. i MAINT.i ROAD 8' MIN. I FREEBOARD NORMAL DEPTH 1 2' MIN. 4 j 2% I - % TRICKLE CHANNEL I BOTTOM WIDTH GRASS SLOPE \ 1r \ CHANNEL SIDE SLOPE NOTES: 1. BOTTOM WIDTH: CONSISTENT WITH MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE DEPTH AND VELOCITY REQUIREMENTS, SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN TRICKLE CHANNEL WIDTH. 2. TRICKLE CHANNEL: CAPACITY TO BE APPROXIMATELY 2% OF 100-YEAR FLOW FOR THE FULLY DEVELOPED, UNDETAINED CONDITION. USE NATURAL LINING WHEN PRACTICAL. 3. NORMAL DEPTH: NORMAL DEPTH AT 100-YEAR FLOW SHALL NOT EXCEED 5 FEET. MAXIMUM 100-YEAR FLOW VELOCITY AT NORMAL DEPTH SHALL NOT EXCEED 7 FT/S. FOR CHANNELS WITH EROSION RESISTANT SOILS OR 5 FT/S FOR CHANNELS WITH EROSIVE SOILS. 4. FREEBOARD: FREEBOARD TO BE A MINIMUM OF 1 FOOT. 5. MAINTENANCE ACCESS ROAD: MINIMUM STABLE WIDTH TO BE 8 FEET WITH CLEAR WIDTH OF 12 FEET. 6. EASEMENT/ROW WIDTH: MINIMUM WIDTH TO INCLUDE FREEBOARD AND MAINTENANCE ACCESS ROAD. 7. CHANNEL SIDE SLOPE: MAXIMUM SIDE SLOPE FOR GRASSED CHANNELS TO BE NO STEEPER THAN 41. 8. FROUDE NUMBER: MAXIMUM VALUE FOR MINOR AND MAJOR FLOODS SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.8 FOR CHANNELS WITH EROSION RESISTANT SOILS OR 0.5 FOR CHANNELS WITH EROSIVE SOILS. N.T.S. FIGURE MD-7b MD-84 Grassed Channel With Trickle Channel 06/2001 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District wHEarq° DEVELOPMENT 1COMMUNITY ,m MEMORANDUM COaaoo TO: Planning Commission FROM: Mary Austin, Planner SUBJECT: Case # WZ-02-13 / Melody Homes FDP Case # WS-02-01 / Melody Homes Final Plat DATE: 8/1/2003 CC: Case File A request is being made for continuance of the Final Development Plan (WZ-02-13) and Final Plat (WS-02-01) to the next Planning Commission meeting. An effort is being made by the applicant to resolve outstanding issues prior to public hearing. Staff recommends that Case # WZ-02-13 and Case # WS-02-01 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting on August 21, 2003. Recommended Motion: "I move that Case No. WZ-02-13, a request for approval of a final development plan, and Case No. WS-02-01, a request for approval of a 38-lot major subdivision plat, for property located at 10285 Ridge Road, be CONTINUED to August 21, 2003." Cr[y of Wheat Ridge ~ Department of public Works MEMORANDUM TO: Mary Austin, Planner FROM: Dave Brossman, Development Review Engineer DATE: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 SUBJECT: Underdrain Agreement for Skyline Estates Hi Mary - I spoke with Jerry Dahl on Monday 7/28/03 regarding the Underdrain Agreement received from Melody Homes on 7/23/03. Jerry suggested that the document be in the form of a Revocable License instead of an Agreement (for various reasons), and stated that he is willing to create the document. As this document he is to prepare will be for the sole benefit of Melody Homes and the Skyline Estates Filings #2 & #3 Subdivisions that it will serve, it seems only fair and equitable for Melody Homes to pay for the preparation of this document. I mentioned to him that he might wish to contact Darrel Pennington of Melody Homes regarding the billing for his services required in the creation of the document, and to verify that Melody Homes is willing to accept this arrangement. At this point in time, I'm not sure whether or not Jerry has discussed this with Darrel. Jerry suggested to me that he would bill the City, and then the City would have Melody Homes pay the invoice for his services. In my opinion, the City should probably have something in writing from Melody Homes agreeing to pay the invoice we are anticipating from Mr. Dahl prior to having him perform the work. The Underdrain document should also be tied into the Skyline Estates Filings #2 & #3 Subdivisions (making a reference to the individual lots of these subdivisions), rather than to the Homeowner's Association in the unlikely event the HOA is ever dissolved. Of course it will be Jerry's decision as to whether or not this is necessary, but those are my thoughts on the subject. Sincerely, David F. Brossman, P.L.S. mailto:daveb@a.ci.wheatrid eg co.us 303.235.2864 CC: Alan White, Director of Community Development Steve Nguyen, Division Manager File Undvd.AV..n -Skyk. FSgi3. KIRKHAM [T~MICHAEL Arizona • Colorado Iowa • Kansas • Nebraska CONSULTING ENGINEERS Mr. David F. Brossman, PLS Development Review Manager City of Wheat Ridge 7500 West 29" Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 RE: Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 Response to July 22, 2003 Technical Review Comments Dear Mr. Brossman: www.kirkliam.coni July 28, 2003 The following response addresses the July 22, 2003 comments referenced in your letter relating to the Drainage Report. Appendix, and Plan and as discussed in our meeting of Juh 24, 2003. The remaining comments will be specifically addressed upon receipt of your civil plan continents. This response follows the format of your comments. The following is being submitted with this response: 1. Red-lined plan and report comments; and 2. Final Drainage Report including Appendix and Plan (2 sets). DRAINAGE REPORT (Discussion) 1. Please see paragraph 2 in sub-section "Columbine Basin" in the Final Drainage Report. Please see paragraph 3 in sub-section "Columbine Basin" in the Final Drainage Report. 3. Please see paragraph 4 in sub-section "Columbine Basin" in the Final Drainage Report. 4. Requisite easements will be obtained along the north side of Ridge Road from the State of Colorado to accommodate any construction outside the Ridge Road right-of-way. These will be obtained and provided to the City of Wheat Ridge prior to commencement of construction in this area outside of the Ridge Road right-of-way. 5. The flows referenced in the Outfall Systems Planning Columbine Basin were understood by KM to be un-detained flows. 6. Please see Appendix 1. 7. As shown in the report under sub-section "Columbine Basin", third table, the 100-year event developed flows are substantially the same as pre-developed historic flows and therefore the flooding or over-topping of Miller Street remains the same. 8. The undeidrain is anywhere from 35 feet to 4.5 feet lower than the storm sewer until such time as it nears the outfall. It is impractical to lower the storm sewer to allow for this connection. 9. Melody Homes, Inc., under separate cover, will provide an approval letter from the Consolidated Re-Juchem Ditch Company indicating their approval of the irrigation plans as submitted. 5600 South Quebec Street • Suite 200 D • Greenwood Village, CO 80111 • (303) 694-2300 • FAX (303) 694-2822 NN Paee 2 of 2 10. "35- foot right-of-way" has been revised to read '35-foot drainage easement 11. The number of sub-basins and acreage has been corrected to 18 and 18.99 respectively. 12. Submitted copy has been signed and sealed by a PE licensed in the State of Colorado. DRAIA 4GE REPORT 1. Minimum freeboard has been indicated on all channel capacity calculations and cross- sections. 2. Drainage Calculations for Ridge Road fronting Skyline Estates Filing Nos. 2 and 3 have been included in Appendix J. 3. Cross Section C-C has been corrected on the drainage map to reflect that section shown in the report. DRAINAGE PLAN 1. Cross Section D-D has been added and Cross Section B-B has been shown in the location requested. 1 Cross Section C-C has been corrected on the drainage map to reflect that section shown in the report. 3. Once the civil plan comments are received and addressed, the plans will reflect the previous subnuttal in regards to the grading east of Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 towards Miller Street. 4. The 2 inlet locations for Ridge Road have been added to the Drainage Plan. 5. Submitted copy has been signed and sealed by a PE licensed in the State of Colorado. We trust this response plus the attached plans will allow for your approval of the Final Drainage Report. Should there be any additional concerns. please contact either myself at 303-694-2300 ext. 320, or Darrel Pennington of Melody Homes Inc. at 303-785-4035. KIRKHAM MICHAEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS William Curtis Archdeacon PE. PLS Division Manager Colorado Land Development Cc: Darrel Pennington, Melody Homes Katie Christopher. Kirkham Michael KM File M0203120 7500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Wheat Telephone 303/235-2846 Ridge FAX 303/235-2857 July 25, 2003 Darrel Pennington Melody Homes 11031 Sheridan Blvd. Westminster, CO 80020 Dear Mr. Pennington: At its meeting of July 17, 2003, the Planning Commission has recommended approval of Case No. WZ-02-13, a request for approval of a zone change from A-1, Agricultural-One, to PRD, Planned Residential Development and PID, Planned Industrial Development, and approval of an outline development plan for property located at 10285 Ridge Road, for the following reasons: 1. The requirements of the City's Planned Development Regulations have been met. 2. The rezoning will not adversely impact the public health, safety or welfare. 3. The zone change is compatible with the surrounding area and the adjacent zoning of residential to the north and west as well as the adjacent zoning of industrial to the south and west. 4. A change in character of the area has occurred due to the zone changes on adjoining property to the north and west. 5. There are physical benefits to be derived from the construction of public improvements and a tree lawn along Ridge Road 6. Adequate infrastructure will be constructed with the development to serve the proposed use. With the following conditions: 1. The residential zoning shall be subject to the City's parkland fee in lieu of land dedication at the time of final plat. 2. Building height in the PID shall be limited to 35 feet. 3. Use numbers 10, 18, 19, 37, 38 and 48 shall be removed as permitted uses from the PID. 4. The height of accessory structures be limited to 12 feet. 5. All references to "blue grass sod" in the application be changed to "sod." The final development plan portion of Case No. WZ-02-13 and Case No. WS-02-01 were continued until the meeting of August 7, 2003. Darrel Pennington Page 2 July 25, 2003 Your request for outline development plan approval is scheduled for first reading by City Council at 7:00 p.m. on August 11, 2003, and second reading with public hearing on September 8, 2003. Please feel free to contact me at 303-235-2846 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Kathy Field Administrative Asst. Enclosure: Draft of Minutes cc: Richard Schierburg 1580 Lincoln St. Ste. 770 Denver, CO 80203 WZ-02-13 & WS-02-01 (case files) c:\...Wy Documenu\Kathy\PCRPTS\PLANOCOM\CORRESP\2003\WZ0213 PUBLIC HEARINGS DRAFT AFT A. Case No. WZ-02-13: An application filed by Melody Homes, Inc. for approval of a rezoning from Agricultural-One (A-1) to Planned Residential Development (PRD) and Planned Industrial Development (PID) and approval of an outline and final development plan for property located at 10285 Ridge Road. It was moved by Commissioner WEISZ and seconded by Commissioner STITES to continue the final development plan portion of the application until the meeting of August 7, 2003. The motion passed 6-0 with Commissioners DAVIS and McMILLIN absent. The case was presented by Mary Austin. She advised the Commission there was jurisdiction to hear the case and reviewed the staff report and digital presentation. All pertinent documents were entered into the record and accepted by Chair McNAMEE. Although inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of agricultural estate residential, a significant change of character in the surrounding area has occurred which warrants the proposed zone change. Therefore, staff recommended approval of the application. Commissioner PLUMMER expressed concern about the planned industrial use portion of the request and suggested that neighborhood commercial might be a better designation. Commissioner WEISZ inquired about the residential density in Filing 3 as compared to the Filings in Arvada. Ms. Austin stated that Filing 2 in Arvada has a gross density of 2.7 units/acre and a net density of 3.4 units/acre. Filing 3 in Wheat Ridge will have a slightly lower density with a gross density of 2.09 units/acre and a net density of 2.55 units/acre. Darrel Pennington Melody Homes Mr. Pennington was sworn in by Chair McNAMEE. He briefly reviewed the applicant's request. In response to Commissioner PLUMMER's concern, he stated the PID zoning included very light industrial uses. Steve Wilson Melody Homes Mr. Wilson was sworn in by Chair McNAMEE. He explained that Arvada's development of the adjacent area has been guided by Arvada's Ridge Home Redevelopment Plan. This plan called for industrial zoning along Ridge Road and the subject application is in line with Arvada's plan. He also stated that Melody Homes does not own the property that is designated PID in the application. Commissioner BERRY inquired about noise impact on the proposed development from passing trains. Mr. Wilson stated that a noise study was performed and the proposed residential areas meet FHA noise limits. Commissioner BERRY suggested that landscaping be drought tolerant. She also expressed concern about the impact on residential areas from some of the allowed uses listed in the PID. Planning Commission Page 2 Jul) 17,-2003 Commissioner STITES inquired about Arvada's PID uses in this area. Mr. Wilson stated that Arvada's industrial zoning in this area is very light industrial with uses similar to those set forth in the subject application. Commissioner McNAMEE suggested that height of accessory structures be considered in approving the application. Chair McNAMEE asked if there were any individuals present who wished to address this matter. There was no response. It was moved by Commissioner PLUMMER and seconded by Commissioner BERRY that Case No. WZ-02-13, a request for approval of a zone change from A-1, Agricultural-One, to PRD, Planned Residential Development and PID, Planned Industrial Development, and approval of an outline development plan for property located at 10285 Ridge Road be approved for the following reasons: 1. The requirements of the City's Planned Development Regulations have been met. 2. The rezoning will not adversely impact the public health, safety or welfare. 3. The zone change is compatible with the surrounding area and the adjacent zoning of residential to the north and west as well as the adjacent zoning of industrial to the south and west. 4. A change in character of the area has occurred due to the zone changes on adjoining property to the north and west. 5. There are physical benefits to be derived from the construction of public improvements and a tree lawn along Ridge Road 6. Adequate infrastructure will be constructed with the development to serve the proposed use. With the following conditions: AFT 1. The residential zoning shall be subject to the City's parkland fee in lieu of land dedication at the time of final plat. 2. Building height in the PID shall be limited to 35 feet. 3. Use numbers 10, 18, 19, 37, 38 and 48 shall be removed as permitted uses from the PID. Commissioner WEISZ offered a friendly amendment to limit the height of accessory structures to 12 feet. The amendment was accepted by Commissioner PLUMMER and Commissioner BERRY. The motion passed 6-0 with Commissioners DAVIS and McMILLIN absent. It was moved by Commissioner BERRY and seconded by Commissioner WEISZ to reopen the hearing in order to change all references to "blue grass sod" in the application to "sod." The motion passed 6-0 with Commissioners DAVIS and McMILLIN absent. Planning Commission Page 3 July 17. 2003 B. Case No. WS-02-01: An application filed by Melody Homes, Inc. for approval of a.38- lot subdivision plat for property located at 10285 Ridge Road. It was moved by Commissioner PLUMMER and seconded by Commissioner WEISZ to continue Case No. WS-02-01 to the meeting of August 7, 2003. The motion passed 6-0 with Commissioners DAVIS and McMILLIN absent. C. Case No. ZOA-03-12: An ordinance amending Chapter 26 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws concerning zoning to provide for the location of substance abuse clinics within certain commercial and industrial zone districts. This case was presented by Alan White. He informed the Commission that there was jurisdiction to hear the case. In reply to a question from Commissioner McNAMEE, Mr. White stated that one such use exists at 44th and Kendall. This use would be grandfathered. No members of the public indicated a desire to address this matter. It was moved by Commissioner WEISZ and seconded by Commissioner STITES to recommend approval of the proposed ordinance amending Chapter 26 concerning zoning to provide for the location of substance abuse clinics within certain commercial and industrial zone districts. The motion passed 6-0 with Commissioners DAVIS and McMILLIN absent. 8. OLD BUSINESS Alan White reported the following: • City Council approved the ordinance approving the permitting process through the Board of Adjustment to allow more than one non-operative vehicle. • City Council approved an ordinance allowing a governmental agency to process a land use application prior to owning the property. • Second reading of the substance abuse ordinance will occur on July 28, 2003. A 38th Avenue Business District Association has been formed. The Association has established a matching grant program for merchants to upgrade signage, facades, etc. A change to Chapter 21 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws dealing with right-of-way permits was approved by City Council on first reading. • The family foster home ordinance is scheduled for second reading on July 28. 2003. • The Family Dollar application was approved by City Council. • The city and Caruso Kitchens are in disagreement about the number of trees to be planted. • If the gas station on the northeast comer of 38`h & Kipling does not meet the deadline for the city's requirement to replace trees which were removed, court action will be initiated. Planning Commission - - Page 4 July 17, 2003 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (303) 235-2868 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 FAX (303) 235-2857 July 22, 2003 Mr. William C. Archdeacon, P.E. Kirkham Michael Consulting Engineers 5600 South Quebec Street, Suite 200D Englewood, Colorado 80111 Re: Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 - Third Review Comments of Final Drainage Report, Grading & Erosion Control Plan, Final Development Plan, and Final Plat Comments. Comments pertaining to the civil plans are not included in this letter. Please be advised that additional comments pertaining to the civil plans will be forthcoming. Dear Mr. Archdeacon, I have completed the third review of the above referenced documents for the Skyline Estates Subdivision received on June 16d' (FDP, Plat, G & EC) and July 3`d (Drainage Report) and have the following comments: Drainage Report (Discussion) (Received July 3, 2003) 1. As per earlier discussions, the storm conveyance facilities along Skyline Estates Filing #3 are to be constructed to the ultimate design as provided in the Columbine Basin Outfall Plan (CBOP), December 1994. If the proposed design is to accommodate less flow (Qtoo) than the flows identified in the CBOP (360cfs for conveyance element #206), the designing engineer must clearly explain, include calculations, and discuss any deviation from the CBOP. The facilities downstream of the development may be designed to accommodate the currently anticipated developed flows. 2. The Columbine Basin Outfall Plan requires that a 24" low-flow underdrain be constructed below the open channel along Ridge Road. The submitted design provides a 4' X 9" concrete trickle channel in lieu of the 24" underdrain. The proposed 4' X 9" concrete trickle channel must conform to the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District's guidelines for grassed channel with trickle channel (please refer to Figure MD-7b in the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual, Volume 1, June 2001). Due to the fact that the proposed concrete trickle channel is a change to the original Columbine design, the UDFCD must also approve the change to the CBOP and shall be required prior to City approval. 3. The design must provide adequate and proper flow of the collected storm water. The Columbine Drainage channel (with low-flow concrete trickle channel) may be an approvable design if it is completely constructed to the discharge point (inlet at Miller Street). Skyline_mview3(Drainage-FDP-Plat).ltr 4. To accommodate the construction of the channel to Miller Street, the 35' Drainage Easement may need to be extended easterly. According to the CBOP, the 35' Drainage Easement extends east to Miller Street (please see Columbine Basin Drawings 9 & 11 for the Ridge Home Tributary). 5. Please discuss whether the 127cfs and 360cfs (QS &Qloo) stated in the CBOP for the Columbine channel were being considered as undetained or metered flows in the CBOP. 6. In the discussion of the Columbine Basin portion of the Report include the proposed capacity of the Columbine channel designed utilizing a 1' minimum freeboard. 7. Due to the insufficient size (18") of the existing storm sewer pipe at Miller Street, please identify any street overtopping expected in this area, and the potential impact to properties lying within the overland flow route during a major storm event. 8. Discuss the proposed underdrain system (4" PVC perf pipe with a 6" main), including the need for such a system and the reason(s) it cannot be incorporated into the proposed storm sewer. Include in the discussion the tie-in to the existing storm sewer system at Ridge Road & Miller Street, and also the maintenance (and the need for a separate maintenance agreement) of the 6" main proposed in the public right-of-way. 9. The Report states on page 6 that the Skyline Estates #1 pond outlet crosses the existing concrete irrigation channel. The report further states that "the drainage swale runs through a culvert under the irrigation channel, and the proposed irrigation pipe invert connects with the existing channel invert prior to the swale crossing and therefore does not affect the existing crossing." Please provide a copy of the approval letter from the Reno-Juchem Ditch Company for the (existing) ditch crossing with the next submittal. (Please see attached photos). 10. Please change the 35-foot right-of-way to a 35' Drainage Easement in the last paragraph on page 1 of the Report. 11. Please double-check the number of sub-basins and total area found under the Runoff Section on page 2, as compared with the Plan. 12. Please provide P.E. seal and signature on the final approved Report. Drainage Report (Appendix) (Received July 3, 2003) 1. Please indicate the minimum freeboard on all channel capacity calculations & cross-sections. 2. Due to the City requirement that public improvements along the north side of Ridge Road are to be constructed during this development, the appendix shall include calculations for the Ridge Road frontage improvements such as inlet calculations, locations, and proposed street capacity (include both Skyline Filings #2 & #3 frontages). 3. Need to double-check Cross-Section C-C on the Drainage Plan and the cross-section shown on page 2 of Appendix H, as they don't match. The calculations indicate a 3.00' bottom width and side slopes of 4:1, while Cross-Section C-C on the Plan has a 10.0' bottom width and side slopes of 3:1. Drainage Plan (Received July 3, 2003) 1. Show Cross-Section D-D, and Cross-Section B-B at the locations indicated on the redlined Plan. 2. Need to double-check Cross-Section C-C on the Drainage Plan and the cross-section shown on page 2 of Appendix H, as they don't match. The calculations indicate a 3.00' bottom width and side slopes of 4:1, while Cross-Section C-C on the Plan has a 10.0' bottom width and side slopes of 3:1. 3. Include a Grading Plan (with cross-section & rip-rap details) for the swale easterly of Skyline Filing #3. Include any specifics about the connection to the existing inlet at Miller Street. This sheet may be incorporated into the construction plan set. 4. Need to include proposed inlet locations along Ridge Road, for both Skyline Filings #2 and #3. Skyline_review3(Drainage-FDP-Plat).It 5. Please provide P.E. seal and signature on the final approved Drainage Plan. Public Works requires 2 signed and stamped sets of the Final Drainage Report and Plan. Please provide these with the next submittal. Grading & Erosion Control Plan 1. The grading and erosion control required to complete the Columbine channel connection east of Skyline Filing #3 to the inlet at Miller Street will need to be included on the Plan. 2. Please correct note #19 found on sheet 8 to read the City of Wheat Ridge (instead of Aurora). Surveying Comments Final Plat Remarks: 1. Please double-check that the Drainage Easement running along the westerly lot line of Lot 1, Block 4 (Industrial Lot) is sufficient in size as to entirely encompass the storm sewer pipe, manhole, and outfall coming from the Skyline Estates Filing #2 development. 2. Please include the square footage and acreage for all Tracts, and Lot 1, Block 4 (Industrial Lot). Final Development Plan Remarks: 1. Please include the square footage and acreage for all Tracts, and Lot 1, Block 4 (Industrial Lot). Storm Sewer Plans 1. Storm Sewer Plan comments are not included at this time. Street Construction Drawings 1. Street Construction Drawing comments are not included at this time. Traffic Engineering A copy of the street construction plans and traffic impact study has been forwarded to the City's Traffic Engineer, Mr. Steve Nguyen, P.E. (303-235-2862) for review and has the following comments: J 1. The traffic impact study needs to be prepared and stamped by a Colorado Professional Engineer w ~3-ti with experience in transportation engineering. g 2. Oak Street is not physically connected or extended south of Ridge Road. Thus, traffic ` .v distribution and level of service may change at this and other nearby intersections. 3. The capacity summary tables (table 5 and 6) need to be clearly labeled for the intersections of Parfet, Nelson and Oak. 4. LOS for eastbound Ridge Road needs to be shown in Table 3, page 7. 5. It appears that the Parfet Street connection will not be implemented at this time, but rather sometime in the future. Please provide two traffic distribution scenarios, one with the Parfet Street connection as proposed in Skyline Filing #2 and one without. Capacity and level of service calculations for the street network will also need to be included in the report to reflect the above scenarios. Address any impact from the changes as necessary. 6. Please show the level of service in Highway Capacity Manual values in the calculation sheets. Skyline-review3(Drainage-FDP-Plat).Itr ICU level of service values are optional. Transportation Planning A copy of the Street construction plans has been forwarded to the City's Transportation Planner, Mr. David Mentor (303-235-2866) for review and has the following comments: ~Cowmen k 1. Ridge Road is an identified streetscape corridor street and is subject to City Council's adopted Streetscape and Architectural Design Manual requirements. A copy of the Manual is available through the Planning Department for $10.00. 2. Please include information along Ridge Road that reflects the cross-section detail provided previously by the City Traffic Engineer. Various details related to the construction of curb, gutter, and detached sidewalk along Ridge Road are included in that cross section. (A copy of the cross section is attached). 3. In the treelawn, the developer shall install: Irrigation system. Turf (or other approved ground cover - see Streetscape Manual). Street trees @35' - 40' spacing; 3" caliper (see Streetscape Manual for approved varieties). The Public Works Department requires 2 signed and stamped copies of the Traffic Impact Study, Storm Sewer Plans, Street Construction Plans, Grading & Erosion Control Plan, Final Development Plan, and Final Plat. Please provide these with the next submittal. Subdivision Improvement Agreement Upon City Council approval of the Final Plat, a Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) will need be executed by the project owner/developer. The City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Department will provide the SIA to the project owner/developer. Please note that there may be additions to this document for this development. Application for Minor Dumping/Landfill Permit Prior to the commencement of any onsite grading, an Application for Dumping/Landfill Permit, along with the fees due will need to be submitted for review and approval. This Permit is generally issued at the time of the Building Permit. Public Improvements Cost Estimate & Guarantee Prior to any construction commencing for the required public improvements within the right-of-way, an itemized engineer's cost estimate will need to be submitted for review and approval. Upon acceptance of this estimate, a letter of credit reflecting total costs of the approved cost estimate plus 25% will need to be submitted by the owner/developer for review and approval. Right-of-Way Construction Permit(s)/Licensing Prior to any construction of the public improvements, the necessary Right-of-Way construction permit(s) and respective licensing will need to be submitted for processing by the City. Right-of-Way Construction Permits are issued only after approval of all required technical documents, including but 4 Skyline-review3(Dminage-FDP-Plat).Itr not limited to, the Final Drainage Report & Plan, Final Plat, Final Development Plan, Traffic Impact Study, Storm Sewer Plans, Street Construction Plans, Grading & Erosion Control Plan, and easement or ROW dedications. A signed acceptance letter from the ditch company will be required prior to the issuance of any building permits. Please return all redlined prints with the fourth submittal. Due to the amount and nature of the abovementioned revisions, additional comments and/or requirements may be forthcoming. If you have any questions, please contact me at 303-235-2864. Sincerely, David F. Brossman, P.L.S. Development Review Engineer Cc: Alan White, Director of Community Development Steve Nguyen, Engineering Manager Dave Mentor, Traffic Planner Mary Austin, Planner Darin Morgan, Code Administrator File Skylinen%iew3(Drniwge-FDP-PW)Atr M O l ~ N M O ~ ~ ~1 • rl o ~ cl~ CA x O ~ O ~ y • ~r.{l i U ~ M O • rl r~ O N O bq ~ r \ a3 n W J a ~ 'I Ct ~ n~ O V ■L. CY) Q n r a r- a~ E Q. _O 0 0 Y .N W i a I.'l n E Q _O 0 0 0 - a 0 a. G. ~F+ E _O 0 a~ O m O m u o a, -Imp M ~ O N ~ O > O O ~i U CT N ~ a N O O ti) rl . r, O O N 1~F V / h O r~ ct -4--j CA ct (1) ~ b/ rl O O ton cn cn rn to, n n 00 N n 6t p M 9Q (v E(t 0? O 101, 1 W~l ON "4' r3 M tq N M O M is N w C7 0. ' A N N a u j V / to J n. C3. ~ ~ 'N L1 b i z z U5 tit ~ m T a n tc q m ~ O N ~ O ~ ,T O ~O rNi~ M O N bA O C.' 3^cF~1 d _m earvor„ wsv+c_ f S 001259" E 106841 E acE:BY]. RW T FCR ~ x „ ~ i wm+ ~ v A ~ - _ _ _ Exisi}e onAwA.B I lY t I tl'r r I• 1 \ \ n4 coE [ E3 ~tlrnWn \ 1\ it III o 4 III I It 11 I BB+cSx i c1 1 , I (I EIS6 CII aw a xm ACas ~v sYBxcx II III I11 III I sw x~ OPR+L MW S6EY4tX } L i I v t lt- ~ yv~ ~ ~l ~ ) ~ x- J one son sTaEEx - ow ~ ~ Nk ~ i tr lI III it II %1, ( II ~ i II I III l✓ ~ ~ \ ~ - iI i~ ~u ll ~i I I 1 i ,A YRYCYx rvnc 2ss ~ 'A ~y i J I \ c nEU } lir I atFNFnx flq l\ n n, N I~ sa„°B u4o_ II II~ b s Imo om ..arcs l~ IA oo EMT J a / ( a s t rxcnr S si e a - .1 a to b ew~ ~--i_ =_i~ i o~mecrc lily $ A j SEIMCF I I~~ I il ~ µ ~ l saw ~zao emm m aa~ mes I I < ~ - xozv ti L ~ ron ~seroe Ik IIII _lli Iltl -.t 11~~ ° I I III III siBr i ~ I i i. `~riadrc l~ nl R,m I ,i 6 I Ii' s;m 30: t o n ~I II III Il II 13 jI Iij A im i ~ p rt , I - i~ l I I 'Ia IIII I I liiwm PRO II I asona I I y V B 57 . $ II~ - T V \ ~ ~erw Y ~I ~ e3 ecn[sI ~ f~ ~ I ) a k `l T a, R 4 s m@eo ¢w ~ t . sl n ~ ~L ' 4 ' : ~ I J~ A ~ ~ Lwrol+ec sm er Nt-, ( FF~ s 4 I 1 j~l-- A :a coax _ n 1r ~~~bftH.braOVr hw) 7 o , Bay ~ I Y r- r _ „ au o;Ea ~ ➢ 1 ~ f~ ~wwux. z oU f }t Ef i a II i E~ i I~ w~a Ewt V I,r ~ BA.4AU6E EA3REtt ~ r r~ "Ili d;9 I _ IJ.- 1114 dl I a= I r~w i~ III I IIII ~ I II ~II r I I I I 11 I~ I Iy I I - I o~c..i~s L ~Rd 1 r,; y y~- it I IiL I ~~Id ~>I r ~ 6E II ILII Jr ~ ~ ~ t - N 001311" W 17246.201 I\ V P OF EATt _ OI S1aEES/ Y~ ~1Bn EnY'fnl FCGc L.11 S.- 9➢VRCP~^'cn q 1 ]O W uTtlrv Ea2MEXY N ~ t cmm~c aaoa Ek5 N W TFA E FNY N IW BE RR ~tlNl FD) f(i0 B:' P.N L ABPN00.NFD) 40 U 1 . (R(C 0 El}4i0]}9) EA'0. NWFY (RE. Na Ill..) -""s, OO r. i y I _ I .`k I i Qo+fz FC I I' I I f11 - ~nncs I I- I I=' I .g Ire _ ' zoo{ - I I I I II I I ~ ' : ~`i H r I i 1 .,T a=0.o R 1 °a 3. 'i -0 r ~..s-`-1 } yt7 ROD NVO t z11- -its- I L~17 '17 \ I l p 1 1=-. f - I I ~ r I. 6~ Y~2 ~ t1 - I 1I 1 J I T Fy)y. ME t o r r ' - ' r r b ~ I ~ I; I z C 4 R p Q ryQ' y~ W C Y' ~ Z 4_] I°I, } ~ w w p1~ u°", N o L (~"'/~S~ w~ rc¢ 3 w i re rcK R' ~NJ~ p N 1 rc Q' R (L ttt~ ~ ~ ~ a g rc ~ a m ~z{`JM'i ~ JW z ~ n w 'Z"xl;n, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ b~5 N W O ZQQ~~W~ p~p wN O ~p ~ ZS ~0. i W~(~[ ~~U yl yVll UZ Q 2 }?Z4 Q~{Wy~q?hJ Y~ [C ¢O YU N~ 2 ~ a ~ JO Fah rc~ Z Na z z ~L~~SLLS. YYK ^~OFS ~'^5 ~ w "'~(O~[u ~ 2040 ==4 rc y~ WWw mo'e o}3'i c"'i ~~c:r SR N po G O NS (KO-V W~ t~i OK 0rc zU' NV' UUz on N 4 w ~U'OmF-, °04 Y U lIIIIJJJJJ N of W P. O W w W P LLYJJN y. 2 jij .Y`.. LL OI/1N D~6~Y1~~0 Ww4 ONJ~yy~~ +/!I- ZSO OfG ~ K< ~Na.~yp.5~?J~~tJayylh uv0 JJ - r t({,~]~ o~1'a~'u~ s~?Q~Jn ~ N~a y~y`^ °z zYiw ~c~w a°- w tJK°!-Y,N 4($x(0a N ~NanQ ~N4 FaTRrsNa¢z~owrcu Wrri3a 4i OJ~40 °fC~z3 Nj °rn ~ cti ° s N~ za~~W'p7aR~~ W A~ S 44f! w zF ~N ml~/lW NF4 U Kp°} ~2 N'e'w W ~m mp J ~ JO K oa'{>3'dzd Nw w'a rc's S o'd"z °~~°a ao4 #~Wn N F`5rc"oro-= R k' za "v+wa a JN mov4~~G 3o ~-¢a 4 u"z n b}aa r"awp~RU J°z K~"~~ oSN Nab .y~.- 5 ~'~.~K rc ~Ww`~N~~u7N6.R-~~qmW4 mrc~"S~dR*tyZG~znmwY~J °Y ~26 Ni0 a17`'U Uf~s) (4JF N'E~HrcNFF QS°deg yS Vi yO V~in ~X.g W3 y 1 jF, 'tl~ z ++~n OaO,~ ~s'L~i m NBJU QJaQ 'Q. ~~aoww~ 3s~si r"NS 2i L9w 4" 4h~ww ~"SK°ss 1 3u (3 RK~{4WmMmp~ D p ,~yy pWp.. Op YY qq ^~p (L VS4C .-NYS XYJ b1h CiKN~?F 4.`-r~P~~~~mNNNN4pVNryty NNnM YWin M~~MN~O YNIQ YJN 04VYYJ~S'v RG)N N4NN ~ih V]N ~(~N OO L•. I2l f . F N I I w ~ IL ~ N ^s IE N ~ @ W N Sk W ~ N 5 W F N n q . f W ! w to _ i LL 03 uz i LLS 0 °5 o 03 ( p wY 1 I O° u U 4° uDi U Q w J Q Q O Q N O } y 4 Q N ? I W r { t- O ) ¢ S ~5w mw M > W dw <v w r1 d` m LL U ~ Z ❑ ra ° z 0 .W W i w R~ 1 .C w ❑ z 0 ❑ z 0 YZ O w w O O ~ Z O ❑ Z O Y ` LL a N w Q U' ~U LL LL W :n' LL ~6 N IS QU itf QU W USC W 0. - U LL' W OU F W °U F w w g V O Q 'L N (K ❑ 14w~>((~~ I<v n N~ I p ~ O tl N O U` N~ >O ttj a t9 Oa OU N~ ( UC9 y0 ~ - < u ~ ^ u a ~ p q ~ 0 a O< Oa w w 0 ~ ~ ae ' a y k I ° E' < c) ~ ? ~ Kei aw a w ~y W 1 ` w 4 $ a i ~31z E 3 I ~ ~x ~ W S s :ll x s t~ ~ ¢ I W 2 a W Y ` ( 3 w y N LL ~ I p ' I z h a a f a " I ~ w I z ~ w F w 0 ~ 5 w E ~ I a ¢z ¢ u . ° ° g if v IN z ~ S LL 0 o 4 i 0 Z I ❑ < ( ❑ T Ja Pd m p W w 1 qq P~ M LL °O o W -0 LL o w< 2 l Y y zt aiD 1 Of _ ~ > w° u b wO N > i ? J g m I~ tl oz~ q ~ AR N o ° w ! - k n~ n Io ~w a ! r~ ~F ¢ w w o¢ Ztt I w a <a < y I 1 Ou Q z o . r hwUU i ~ U, w w ( n W u~• N O i ..s W u. w o a > m air b O w U W ❑z U c ww Zti e w w w LL . z ag f zr_tg p Z 0 0 Z .n U' OJ W ~ O Ut) N O >g 2W q 1 Y 1 .ttl U~ W v~ ~Q, I~ , p ' ~ j g W t lu. LL t- ww r- a ~ O ( z . K patt ti a Ot-.. u I O! O Q 0 . a t0 ti t K a j _ p I ~ w z U ~ I 41 ~ < 1Q C < I I { i o ( I `m y ~ W'> [ W i V <o q wad 1 W 2i z a z~ I I ~ , a m e ~ < a o i f ~ a u ~ a z C a ~ W I t; > z < I I i w a t s _7 N z ! ~ i i `3 ^W ' N ~ g a °s ~ i I z L ~ y ~ q g~4 I m i i O r I w r ~ U N ! ~ Y ~ U Z < W' T + g J ~ ~ ` 6 e q U R ~ LL 6 g ~ g i ~ ( ¢ i I F z w z w 0 Fa K m 0 N~ ==J ~N ~z z' ~o a V 1 l--l ct W w < C wwm ^A f Po 0 5 0, C w 6 Z Q z z avev CD Fa a rnn U<6 Qti~ rnw 3 s 0z wwzQ W¢ m mw z rr n z o0 0 u z * JZ 'zw aW Q my~} y xr ~ Z tij tK. S Q 'G U wJ rt} q 1- Wi n. 9¢ a w© 00.w dZ --~CCOOW'xW vY wz ~w~ uJ O~ ~ j O mwQ z z wo r7i a rNw wmy. RZ O:E 6 Q U a ° Z Vdi EY Y Y- Q. a y az w ui p~ ¢w F- m Oq y~F a 0¢ o z a o > z 0 w W F w o Ke, z r~r ocew V) Lo ¢ enIxi(x}n Zw may { g zQ F) 0 w w ° r ~tX mw wV) N7w.J OftiO !/1 CC UZU 2441 O wmQ W QQ CL uj zQZp~ ww pomp>o0 v Qwwm 5r adz `0:2 fk: roUW7uic-% ¢s twr ctz U-Zr Q@z uj Ow z acs" ° zci r© n M ca no :3 w ~ a z c~u U nc nwmasz °Qco°n n ~ q R Z Cyr fk. GA w V} V ° a)U 3y yZp~ W X71'. adw ~s ~owZ![ a Q mot , a~X f~S .-wwF- cy ln6 Ki MK w~>- V i .+:z ari u~.z ui*w- tiaw M o ~ O M O q ro ° a IZ- o U p ~ +-'N cn ~ N U O = O N L N p .cA U 7~T Cl) LL N c L > - a) -0 U) O L- L co 0- C O a o > C: C: • N Q 4-0 N cn U CL a) Lo ~o o~oo ~U~ fIN LD _P" M ~C O o .o M 3Cd C`• n ~ M >t N ~ (6 N ~ ~ O O Q. 4-0 N N 4 1-0 ~j O N ~ O N U N U U ~ N ~ O N O o c6 L ~ O O o O O ~ Q o L ~ cd O ~ ~ i O L L C C6 C~ 4-0 Z3 0- C > O C: ry + O a) Q C N N L W a) Q Q U O E U O W O fi ✓ 4-0 c!1 O M L U) (6 O C: L) O C- O C O N O ~ 04- N O C C L N -0 N U) ~ Co E C 0 41-1 C: 0 0-0 U U C cn N C O O O N -0 -0 _ E N m N a m M ~ O O ~ ~ O o ~ M U a. ~ ~ C~ Jc: 4-j ~ 4- O O J J Q Q 0 ~ ~ n 1..1. n CL V , V J U) n , W W (D E E E E O O N C N •E 4-1 n W E O N r) N M d ~ O ~ ~ O M O O ~ a CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission DATE OF MEETING: July 17, 2003 DATE PREPARED: July 10, 2003 CASE NO. & NAME: WZ-02-13 / Melody Homes CASE MANAGER: Mary Austin ACTION REQUESTED: Rezone from A-1, Agricultural-One to PRD, Planned Residential Development and PID, Planned Industrial Development. Approval of an Outline Development Plan. LOCATION OF REQUEST: NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT(S): 10285 Ridge Road Melody Homes 11031 Sheridan Blvd. Westminster, CO 80020 NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER(S): State of Colorado APPROXIMATE AREA: 17.67 Acres (769,655.51 square feet) PRESENT ZONING: PRESENT LAND USE: SURROUNDING ZONING: SURROUNDING LAND USE: A-1, Agricultural Vacant land E: A-1 S: PID, Industrial N:, & W City of Arvada residential N_: Residential E_: Public S: Industrial W: Vacant: Approved for Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AER, Agricultural Estate Residential (1 unit/acre) DATE PUBLISHED: July 3, 2003 DATE POSTED: July 1, 2003 DATED LEGAL NOTICES SENT: July 3, 2003 ENTER INTO RECORD: (X) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) ZONING ORDINANCE (X) EXHIBITS ( ) SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS ( ) OTHER JURISDICTION: The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. I. REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a zone change from A-1, Agricultural to PRD, Planned Residential Development and PID, Planned Industrial Development and approval of an Outline Development Plan for property located at 10285 Ridge Road. (Exhibit 1, Zoning Map) The purpose of the request is to allow for the development of the property into 37 single family residential lots and 1 industrial lot. The Outline Development Plan approval process will establish the zoning, permitted uses, development standards and general design parameters. Publication and noticing has taken place for the Final Development Plan and Final Plat to be heard at this same public hearing. However, due to a delay in approval of the final drainage report and Ridge Road design it is being requested that they be continued to the next Planning Commission meeting on August 7, 2003. II. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING The required neighborhood meeting was held on June 19, 2002. A copy of the meeting summary and the sign-in sheets (Exhibit 2) are included with this report. III. OUTLINE PLAN As part of the rezoning process the applicant has submitted the required Outline Development Plan (ODP). (Exhibit 3, Outline Development Plan) The property being rezoned is approximately 17.67 acres in size (769,655.51 sq. ft.). The property has frontage on Ridge Road (southern boundary) and W 54' Avenue (northern boundary). The property is currently zoned A-1, Agricultural. The site is, at the present, vacant land. It was formerly utilized as a tree farm. Of the total site area, 14.49 acres (82%) are to be zoned PRD, residential and 3.18 acres (18%) are to be zoned PID, industrial. Sheet 3 of the ODP shows the extent and location of the areas proposed for PRD and PID zoning. The PID zoning is delineated with a bold line and is located at the southwest corner of the property along Ridge Road. Sheet 2 of the ODP establishes the list of permitted uses and development standards for the PRD and PID zones. As required, the ODP site plan shows the conceptual layout of streets, drainage areas and open space tracts. The proposed lot lines and easements are also shown for a total of 38 lots to be created with a final plat document. Of these lots, 37 will be for residential use and 1 for industrial use. The layout of the residential and industrial areas is compatible with the residential and industrial locations in the adjacent Skyline Estates Filing 2 to the west. Filing 2 in the City of Planning Commission Page 2 WZ-02-13/Melody Homes Arvada creates an industrial area adjacent to Ridge Road with residential lots to the north. The development of the total site is planned to occur in two phases. The first phase will encompass the residential lots with associated improvements, streets, utilities, drainage improvements and all public improvements. The Final Development Plan and Final Plat have been submitted and are currently under final review prior to public hearing. The second phase will consist of the development of the industrial lot for which a final development plan will be submitted at a later date. Residential Component There will be a total of 37 residential lots. The permitted uses in the PRD zoning area are limited to single family residences and typical accessory structures such as sheds and detached garages. The permitted uses do not allow for any type of multi-family dwellings. Most of the development standards for the residential zoning refer to the appropriate section of the City's Zoning Code. The minimum lot size is being established at 7,900 square feet which is slightly larger than the City's R-113 residential zoning district. The average lot size is approximately 0.25 acres in size. The minimum front setback of 20 feet is consistent with Skyline Estates Filings 1 and 2 in the City of Arvada. It does vary slightly from the standard of 30 feet required by the City's conventional residential zoning districts. However, additional design standards are being incorporated into the front setback requirement. A staggering of the front setback line is provided for in note #4 of the residential development standards. The front setback of homes shall vary between 20 to 25 feet with a minimum variation of 2.5 feet. This shall provide visual relief along the street frontage instead of having the homes built on the same setback line. Additional neighborhood aesthetics will be accomplished by requiring that no two homes with the same elevation and floor plan will be constructed on adjacent lots or lots across the street. Furthermore, there will not be two garage dominant models adjacent to each other. Other design standards aimed at increasing aesthetic appeal have been included in notes 2, 3 and 7 of the residential standards. An extensive amount of brick or stone will be included on each home fagade. The first floor of each front elevation will be required to have a minimum of 50% brick or stone with a 4-foot return along each side. In order to break up the side plane of homes located on a corner lot or adjacent to an open space tract, those homes shall have a minimum of 2 windows on that side, trim board enhancements, and variation in siding material. Open space is being provided in the amount of 4.79 acres. This amounts to 27% of the total site. Some of the open space will also function as drainage features. Open space and drainage areas will be set up in tracts on the final plat document. Planning Commission Page 3 WZ-02-13/Melody Homes Industrial Component The PID zoning is proposed for a single industrial lot and a drainage tract. The list of allowed uses on the Outline Development Plan closely mirrors the City's C-1, Commercial-One district. Some of the potentially incompatible uses (such as auto repair and service, auto, recreational vehicle and trailer sales, flea markets and mini-warehouses) have been eliminated from the list. Some compatible uses permitted in the City's industrial district (such as greenhouses, nurseries and office/warehouse) have been included. The industrial development standards are consistent with the City's current code requirements. For most standards, a reference to the specific code section is made. The minimum landscaped area is established at 20% of the total site. In order to help protect the traffic pattern on Ridge Road and the residential neighborhood, access to the industrial parcel shall be from Oak Street only. The industrial standards require buffering and screening for parking areas. Any outdoor storage will have to be explicitly identified on an approved final development plan and function only as an accessory to a permitted use with screening requirements being met. The architectural design will be specifically detailed on the final development plan at the future time it is submitted for approval. Architectural standards established on this Outline Development Plan require exterior materials of brick, stone, wood and glass. Fenestration and articulation of the fagade is also required. Metal buildings are expressly prohibited. IV. REZONING CRITERIA Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a zone change request. That the existing zone classification currently recorded on the official zoning maps of the City of Wheat Ridge is an error. The property is currently zoned A-1, Agricultural. There is no mistake on the zoning map. 2. That a change in the character in the area has occurred due to installation of public facilities, other zone changes, new growth trends, deterioration or development transitions. A change in character of the area has occurred on the adjacent properties to the north and west. The property to the north in the City of Arvada has been rezoned to residential and has been recently developed with single family homes. The property to the west in the City of Planning Commission Page 4 WZ-02-13/Melody Homes Arvada has been approved for industrial zoning along Ridge Road, with the remainder of the property as residential. 3. That the change of zone is in conformance, or will bring the property into conformance, with the City of Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan goals, objectives and policies, and other related policies or plans for the area. The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map designates the property as AER Agricultural Estate Residential 1 unit/acre. The proposed zoning of industrial and single family residential is not in direct conformance with this designation. To be economically viable a greater residential density is being proposed. Based on the total site area a gross density of 2.09 dwellings per acre is proposed. Considering the residential area to be platted into 37 lots, the net density is proposed at the rate of 2.55 dwellings per acre. While this density exceeds the recommendation of the Comprehensive Plan it is not disproportionate to the surrounding residential density. The Comprehensive Plan does designate the area on the south side of Ridge Road, across the street from this property, as BP, Planned Business/Industrial Parks. The proposed industrial zone on the north side of Ridge Road is compatible with this designation. Considering the surrounding land uses, staff concludes that it is unlikely that the site will be developed with a low density residential use. The boundaries established on the future land use map are meant to be somewhat flexible. While the proposal is not in strict conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, the adjacent land uses of industrial and single family residential should be considered. 4. That the proposed change of zone is compatible with the surrounding area and there will be minimal adverse impacts considering the benefits to be derived. The change of zone will be compatible with the surrounding area. The industrial zoning along Ridge Road is compatible with the industrial zoning across Ridge Road to the south. The residential zoning will be consistent with the single family residential zoning to the north and west in the City of Arvada. 5. That there will be social, recreational, physical and/or economic benefits to the community derived by the change of zone. There could potentially be economic benefits associated with the area identified for industrial zoning in the form of additional revenue to the City. There are physical benefits associated with the construction of public improvements along Ridge Road. These improvements will include a detached sidewalk and tree lawn as identified in the City's Streetscape and Architectural Design Manual. Planning Commission Page 5 WZ-02-13/Melody Homes Other than the one-time fees and taxes, the economic benefit to the City will be minimal. Property tax revenue is low considering the services the City will be required to provide to the new residences. Additionally, residents may shop in Wheat Ridge but a good portion of retail shopping will likely occur in Arvada due to the close proximity of Arvada businesses. 6. That adequate infrastructure/facilities are available to serve the type of uses allowed by the change of zone, or that the applicant will upgrade and provide such where they do not exist or are under capacity. All utility providers will serve the property with improvements constructed at the developer's expense. Tracts will be provided for on-site drainage features according to the final drainage plan. That the change of zone will not adversely affect public health, safety or welfare by creating excessive traffic congestion, creating drainage problems, or seriously reducing light and air to adjacent properties. The traffic impact study has been reviewed and approved to assure that the increase in traffic from the residential and industrial development is accounted for. Setbacks are established with the development standards to protect the amount of light and air available to adjacent properties. 8. That the change of zone will not create an isolated or spot zone district unrelated to adjacent or nearby areas. Both the PRD and PID zoning as proposed will be compatible with surrounding property. The rezoning will not create an isolated zone district of either residential or industrial. The industrial area will be adjacent to industrial zoning to the south and west. The residential zoning will be adjacent to similar single family residential zoning to the north and west. V. AGENCY REFERRALS All outside service agencies will serve the property when developed. Arvada Fire District will serve the property. A traffic impact study has been reviewed and approved by the City's Traffic Engineer. All public improvements required for the safe movement of vehicles will be constructed by the developer. A final drainage report and plan is in the process of being reviewed in conjunction with the final plat and final development plan. Public improvements along Ridge Road will be required as part of the final plat and final development plan. Planning Commission Page 6 WZ-02-13/Melody Homes The Parks and Recreation Department has requested fee in lieu for parkland dedication. VI. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION Staff concludes that although inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of agricultural estate residential, there has been such a change of character in the surrounding area as to warrant the proposed zone change. Therefore, staff recommends Approval of Case No. WZ-02-13 with a condition that the parkland fee in lieu of land dedication be required at time of final plat. VII. RECOMMENDED MOTIONS Option A: "I move that Case No. WZ-02-13, a request for approval of a zone change from A-1, Agricultural to PRD, Planned Residential Development and PID, Planned Industrial Development and approval of an outline development plan for property located at 10285 Ridge Road, be APPROVED for the following reasons: 1. The requirements of the City's Planned Development Regulations have been met. 2. The rezoning will not adversely impact the public health, safety or welfare. 3. The zone change is compatible with the surrounding area and the adjacent zoning of residential to the north and west as well as the adjacent zoning of industrial to the south and west. 4. A change in character of the area has occurred due to the zone changes on adjoining property to the north and west. 5. There are physical benefits to be derived from the construction of public improvements and a tree lawn along Ridge Road. 6. Adequate infrastructure will be constructed with the development to serve the proposed use. With the following condition: 1. The residential zoning shall be subject to the City's parkland fee in lieu of land dedication at the time of final plat. Option B: "I move that Case No. WZ-02-13, a request for approval of a zone change from A-1, Agricultural to PRD, Planned Residential Development and PID, Planned Industrial Development and approval of an outline development plan for property located at 10285 Ridge Road, be DENIED for the following reasons: 1. 2. Planning Commission Page 7 WZ-02-13/Melody Homes 1 I I I i , i I I I I I I I I 3 z 5E 16 OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WHEAT RIDGE COLORADO PARCEULOT BOUNDARY (DESIGNATES OWNERSHIP) WATER FEATURE * DENOTES MULTIPLE ADDRESSES 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN (APPROXIMATE LOCATION) 0 W 207 367 5!A,«. Tmm~ NE 16 4 DEPARTMENTOF MAP ADOPTED: June 15, 1994 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Last Revision: September 10, 2001 EXHIBIT 1 7500 West 29' Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215 City of Wheat Ridge Telephone (303) 235-2846 Fax(303)235-2857 Neighborhood Meeting Summary Date: June 19, 2002 City Staff Present: Mary Austin, Planner Michael Garcia, Development Review Engineer 4 Location of Meeting: Wheat Ridge Municipal Building, 2"d floor conference room Property Address: 10285 Ridge Road Property Owner: Sate of Colorado Property Owner Present? No Applicant: Melody Homes Applicant Present? Yes Existing Zoning: A-1 Comp Plan Designation: AER (1 unit/acre) Existing use/site conditions: Vacant land Applicants proposal: To rezone the property from A-1 to PRD and PID and receive approval of an Outline Development Plan, Final Development Plan and Final Plat. The applicant intends to develop the site with 37 single family residential homes and an industrial area along Ridge Road. Issues discussed: Questions were posed regarding plans for the industrial area. Melody Homes commented that the industrial area is planned to be compatible with the industrial area in the City of Arvada along Ridge Road. It is not planned to be an intensive manufacturing area. The industrial area will p\most likely not be a part of the homeowners association. Maintenance of Ridge Road: The road is entirely within the City of Wheat Ridge and will be maintained by Wheat Ridge. Questions were raised about the keeping of large animals on the residential lots. Melody Homes responded that the covenants will likely prohibit large animals and they will not be listed as a permitted use. Traffic circulation: A traffic impact study will be required to be submitted by Melody Homes and approved by the City. EXHIBIT 2 (0 W v cn A W N 1 C J A P r l r o n .p 0 w W w ~ a o ~ N 0 1 s z J, Lc") o O W N W w Iz D) CD D C2 C2 y N M 0 3 CD t- Z M D M M O = N z C- z m O z i m ~ 0 _ D M Z Cl) CL N = O M M C D M N v N ~ m N m o -I z CO W v O U7 W N O ' Q , Iz CD I Iw ~ D ~ a \ CD ~y y ~ N 1. a ~ W o V4 1 9s r Z m m m G) = M L' C- z z m W 0 z C) C rn G) r- ;a z D ? z 9) a p ~ 2 0 cn p O rn m 0 0 3 -4 m < - m Fn M o -I z Z G) 1 RE: Mineral Interest Notification Pursuant to C.R.S. § 24-65.5-101, et seq. To: Identified Owner of Mineral Interest or Leasehold Estate This letter is to inform you of public land use hearings to be held regarding an application for development on property on which you may have a Mineral or Leasehold interest. Please review the attached legal description to determine the location of the property in question. This letter constitutes a complete and adequate notice according to Colorado State Law. Location of Meetings: City of Wheat Ridge, Wheat Ridge, Colorado 7500 W. 29`h Ave. * Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 (Planning Commission and Town Board Meeting Location) Legal Description: Township 3 South, Range 69 West, 6`h P.M. Section 16: Part of the SW/4NE/4 identified as Skyline Estates Filing No. 3; Jefferson County, Colorado (See Attached Legal) Planning Commission Date: July 17, 2003 at 7:OOPM Land Use Request: Rezoning to Residential Planned Unit Development, Site Specific Final Development Plan, Final Plat for 37 lots & Construction Plans with Associated Development Agreements Owner of Land: Ridge Venture, LLC, c/o Peregrine Group Development LLC 1580 Lincoln Street, Suite 770 Denver, CO 80203. p (303) 832-1377 f (303) 832- 1569 Addresses: The State of Colorado for the use and benefit of the Department of Institutions c/o The Colorado State Land Board 1313 Sherman Street, Room 620 Denver, Colorado 80203 Mary Austin City Planner City of Wheat Ridge 7500 W. 29`x' Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 JUM16 2003 2:01PM IP LASERJET 3200 - P.1 Robert P. Messana Attorney at Law 315 W. Oak St., Ste., 704 Fort Collins, CO 80521 Robert P. Messana FACSIMILE COVER SHEET DATE: June 16, 2003 FROM: Tawnie Mathews TO: Mr. Darrell Pennington Melody Homes, Inc. RECEIVING FAX NO.: (303)466-1838 RE: Supplemental Mineral Title Examination ENCLOSURES: Supplemental Opinion Letter Telephone (970) 482-6551 Facsimile (970) 482-1107 Email address: robert®messanataw.can Web Address: www.messanalaw.com NOTICE TO ALL PERSONS RECEIVING THIS TRANSMISSION: THIS TRANSMISSION IS INTENDED FOR THE ADDRESSEE NAMED ABOVE. THE CONTENTS OF THIS TRANSMISSION ARE CONFIDENTIAL. IF YOU ARE NOT AUTHORIZED, PLEASE DO NOT READ THE FOLLOWING PAGES OF THIS TRANSMISSION. PLEASE DELIVER ALL PAGES OF THIS TRANSMISSION TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT IN A SEALED ENVELOPE. I am sending 2 page(s) (including this cover sheet). If this transmission is incomplete, please call (970) 482-6551. Thank you. NOTES: ORIGINAL: X Will be sent by mail; Will not be sent by mail JUM16 2003 2:01PM '..'P LASERJET 3200 Robert P. Messana, P.C. Attorney atLaw 315 W. Oak St., Ste. 704 Fort Collins, CO 80521 Robert P_ Messana June 16, 2003 Telephone (970) 482-6551 Facsimile (970) 482-1107 Email address: robert@messanalaw.com Web address: www.messanalaw.com Melody Homes, Inc_ Via Facsimile (303) 466-1838 Mr. Darrell Pennington and US. Mail 11031 Sheridan Blvd. Westminster, Colorado 80020 RE: Supplemental Mineral Title Examination Townshig_3 South Range 69 West. 6°P.M. Section 16: Part of the S WANEA identified as Skyline Estates Filing No. 3; Jefferson County, Colorado Dear Mr. Pennington: Pursuant to your request, I have updated my title examination of the captioned lands in order to supplement my letter of July 3, 2002, regarding ownership of the mineral estate (including leasehold estate), in the said lands. Please be advised that there are no changes to the mineral or leasehold ownership as set forth in my previous letter and your attention is directed to such Letter for the said ownership. Title is certified to May 30, 2003 at 5:00 p.m. Thank you for allowing this office the opportunity to assist you in this matter. Should you have any questions regarding the above, please feel free to contact us. Yours truly, R P. b4ESSANA, P. C. Robert P. Messana Attorney at Law p.2 A9De6~PabIiclAC4wVddadY Hams, GcV3 Mx< [ 31'5 P➢1ema ~ 0P.-.0 JUL•03 2002 1:53PM 'P LRSERJET 3200 Robert P. Messana Attorney at Law 315 W. Oak St., Ste., 704 Telephone (970) 482-6551 Fort Collins, CO 80521 Facsimile (970) 482-1107 Email address: Robert P. Messana robertc'_rmessanalaw.com Web Address. www rnessanalaw.com FACSIMILE COVER SHEET DATE: July 3, 2002 FROM: Tawnie Mathews, Legal Assistant TO: Mr. Scott Bernhardt Melody Homes, Inc. RECEIVING FAX NO.: (303)466-1838 RE: Mineral Title Examination Skyline-30d ENCLOSURES: Mineral Title: Opinion Letter NOTICE TO ALL PERSONS RECEIVING THIS TRANSMISSION: THIS TRANSMISSION IS INTENDED FOR THE ADDRESSEE NAMED ABOVE. THE CONTENTS OF THIS TRANSMISSION ARE CONFIDENTIAL. IF YOU ARE NOT AUTHORIZED, PLEASE DO NOT READ THE FOLLOWING PAGES OF THIS TRANSMISSION. PLEASE.DELIVER ALL PAGES OF THIS TRANSMISSION TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT IN A SEALED ENVELOPE. I am sending 3 page(s) (including this cover sheet). If this transmission is incomplete, please call (970) 482-6551. Thank you. NOTES: Please find to follow the Opinion Letter'as prepared by Mr. Messana of this date. ORIGINAL: X Will be sent' by mail; Will not be sent by mail p.1 Robert P. Messana, P.C. Attorney at Law 315 W. Oak St., Ste. 704 Fort Collins, CO 80521 Robert P. Messana Telephone (970) 482-6551 Facsimile (970) 482-1107 Email address: robert@messanalaw.com Web address: www.messanalaw.com July 3, 2002 Melody Homes, Inc. Mr. Scott Bernhardt 11031 Sheridan Blvd. Westminster, Colorado 80020 Via Facsimile (303)465-1838 and U.S. Mail RE: Mineral Title Examination Township 3 South, Range 69 West, 6 h P.M. Section 16: Part of the SW/4NE/4 identified as Skyline Estates Filing No. 3, Jefferson County, Colorado Dear Mr. Bernhart: Pursuant to your request under cover of facsimile dated June 20, 2002, but for the account of Melody Homes, Inc., this office has examined title to the captioned lands in order to provide the following information: Ownership of the mineral estate (including leasehold estate), as defined by C.R.S. § 24-65.5- 102, underlying the captioned lands. Subject to the limitations set forth below, ownership of the mineral and leasehold estates appears as follows: 1. Mineral Estate: The State of Colorado for the use and benefit of the Department of Institutions c/o The Colorado State Land Board 1313 Sherman Street, Room 620 Denver, Colorado 80203 Melody Homes, Inc. Mr. Scott Bernhardt July 3, 2002 Page 2 of 2 II. Leasehold Estate: None included in the materials examined. The above named party should be notified pursuant to C.R.S. § 24-65.5-103, 30 days prior to the initial public hearing on your development application. Please note the term "application for development" is broadly defined to include a preliminary or final plat for a subdivision, a planned unit development, or any other similar land use designation used by a local government. The term includes application for zoning, rezoning, general development plans, and special use permits where such application is in anticipation of new surface development. The term does not include building permit applications. The information provided above is based upon an examination of the records maintained by the Office of the Colorado State Land Board, Transnation Title Company, Denver, Colorado, and the records of the Jefferson County Clerk and Recorder, from inception of title to June 19, 2002, at 745 a.m., and is certified to such date. This opinion is conditioned upon the accuracy and completeness of the said materials and the undersigned has not undertaken to verify the same; thus, any errors contained in or omissions from the materials examined will necessarily be reflected herein. In addition to the above, the records of the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission and of the Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology were reviewed (via the internet). Based on this review there is neither evidence of mining operations nor of a producing oil and/or gas well on the captioned lands. This letter is neither intended to, nor does it constitute an opinion as to the quality of Melody Home's title in or to the captioned lands. Insomuch as it may acquire any interest in the mineral estate, Melody Homes is encouraged to retain by exception and reservation, in any subsequent conveyance, all right, title and interest in and to the same. Please note, addresses are based upon the most current and reliable sources available°o this office, including various county records arid internet records, and are deemed reasonably reliable. Thank you for allowing this office the opportunity to assist you in this matter. Should you have any questions regarding the above, please feel free to contact us. Yours truly P. C. Attorney at Law FUctveWelody Homes,lne@32-08 Title Review(Skyl e3)V fter Opwomwd POSTING CERTIFICATION Wz-d2-13 CASENO. w5-~z ©J PLANNING COMMISSION / CITY COUNCIL / BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (Circle One) HEARING DATE: l i1-7 ~003. O 7: on Ipm 1, Dame,\ Penh (name) residing at Oosk puma. BWD We,,4.mi sla Y4o eW-W (address) t~JZ-o2-13 as the applicant for Case No. V6- 02- o 1 hereby certify that I have posted the Notice of Public Hearing at ti e, ,Jh t 11u~ upa ~eK~ Cou~~~ f _<ha~ bush 7 o w~ 2 fti 4us (location) on this fi~,r day of J N I y 20 03 , and do hereby certify that 1 said sign has been posted and remained in place for fifteen (15) days prior to and including the scheduled day of public hearing of this case. The sign was posted in the position shown on the map below. Signature: /Z"Z, NOTE: This form must be submitted at the public hearing on this Ease and will be placed in the applicant's case file at the Community Development Department. I T e:\p1ann1ng\forrnslpost1 ngcert Rev. 1/1/03 MAP hVyurvr ESrrk a s 61uNb X1..3 -v- v 5t(a4 Ft;srrIr46 T = L woarrav,4 Q6q 16 FAe-tH(, 1D6~ 7500 West 29th Avenue The City of Ridge FAX 303/235-2857 July 3, 2003 Dear Property Owner: This is to inform you of Case No. WZ-02-13 which is a request for approval of a rezoning from Agricultural-One (A-1) to Planned Residential Development (PRD) and Planned Industrial Development (PID) and approval of an outline & final development plan and Case No. WS-02- 01 which is a request for approval of a 38-lot major subdivision plat for property located at 10285 Ridge Road. These cases will be heard by the Wheat Ridge Planning Commission in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue. The meeting will be held on July 17, 2003 at 7:00 p.m. As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at 303-235-2846. Thank you. Planning Division. C.Domments and Settinp\athyPMy DocumenuVghy\PC"TS\PLAN OWcnotice\2003\w 213&ws0201.wpd ~3/tea-c # 1 MetroScan / J ferson Owner :State Of Colorado Schedule :042821 Site :10285 Ridge Rd Wheat Ridge 80033 7003 0500 0004 7661 0780 Mail :3550 W Oxford Ave Denver Co 80236 LandUse :9129 Exempt,State,Land Price :$44 TaxDist :1062 OwnerPh Bedrm: Bth: YB:1958 Parking: Firepl: TotArea:380,869 Ac:123.47 # 2 MetroScan / Jefferson • Owner :Coors Brewing Company Schedule :136211 Site :10619 W 50th Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 7003 0500 0004 7661 0797 Mail :PO Box 4030 Golden Co 80401 LandUse :3112 Ind,Improved Land Price TaxDist :3105 OwnerPh Bedrm: Bth: YB:1968 Parking: Firepl: TotArea:428,859 Ac:27.05 # 3 MetroScan / Jefferson : Owner :Lic Investments Inc Schedule :176621 Site :5000 Oak St Wheat Ridge 80033 7003 0500 0004 7661 0803 Mail :4030 Vincennes Rd Indianapolis In 46268 LandUse :3111 Vacant,Industrial Price TaxDist :3105 OwnerPh Bedrm: Bth: YB: Parking: Firepl: TotArea: Ac:.98 # 4 MetroScan / Jefferson • Owner :H F Investment Company Llc Schedule :193783 Site :*no Site Address* - - - "1 11 1~1 Mail :2401 E 2nd Ave #250 Denver Cc 80206 7003 0500 0004 7661 0810 LandUse :1111 Vacant,Residential Price Tax Dist :1007 OwnerPh Bedrm: Bth: YB: Parking: Firepl: TotArea: Ac:15.71 # 5 : MetroScan / Jefferson • Owner :Melody Homes Inc Schedule :433387 Site :*no Site Address* 7003 0500 0004 7661 082 Mail :11031 Sheridan Blvd Westminster Co 8002 0 LandUse :1177 Vacant,Residential,Limited Size Price :$6,347,800 TaxDist :1006 OwnerPh Bedrm: Bth: YB: Parking: Firepl: TotArea: Ac:.44 Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. State Of Colorado Coors Brewing Company Lic Investments Inc 3550 W Oxford Ave PO Box 4030 4030 Vincennes Rd Denver, CO 80236 Golden, CO 80401 Indianapolis, IN 46268 H F Investment Company Llc Melody Homes Inc 2401 E 2nd Ave #250 11031 Sheridan Blvd Denver, CO 80206 Westminster, CO 80020 * Search Parameters * Jefferson (CO) * 7/1/2003 * 10:51 AM Parcel Number ...22 39 161 05 012 39 161 05 018 39 161 05 029 39 161 05 030 39 161 05 034 39 161 05 033 39 161 05 032 39 161 05 031 39 161 05 028 39 161 05 020. 39 161 05 019 39 161 04 102 39 161 04 101 39 164 01 002 39 164 01 003 39 164 01 004 39 162 06' 072 39 162 06 071 39 162 06 038 39 162 00 007 39 161 00 001 39 161 04 041 A 't?91 # 1 MetroScan / Jefferson • Owner :Witbak Vernon G Schedule :042688 Site :11001 Ridge Rd Wheat Ridge 80033 Parcel :39 163 00 002 Mail :11001 Ridge Rd Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Xferd :06/08/1987 LandUse :1112 Res,Improved Land Price :$74,500 TaxDist :3115 OwnerPh :303-421-4344 Bedrm:3 Bth:1.00 YB:1942 Parking:Detached Firepl: TotArea:1,518 Ac:.51 # 2 * : MetroScan / Jefferson ' Owner :Cook Lester M Trustee Schedule :042787 Site :5250 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Parcel :39 162 00 003 Mail :5250 Quail St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Xferd :02/11/2002 LandUse :1112 Res,Improved Land Price TaxDist :3113 OwnerPh :303-422-0301 Bedrm:2 Bth:2.25 YB:1962 Parking:Detached Firepl:l TotArea:1,212 Ac:1.67 # 3 ' MetroScan / Jefferson ; Owner :Dana Dion Schedule :042809 Site :11005 Ridge Rd Wheat Ridge 80033 Parcel :39 163 00 003 Mail :11005 Ridge Rd Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Xferd :05/05/1975 LandUse :1112 Res,Improved Land Price :$38,000 TaxDist :3113 OwnerPh Bedrm:2 Bth:1.00 YB:1961 Parking:Attached Firepl:l TotArea:1,066 Ac:.73 # 4 ' MetroScan / Jefferson • Owner :Aho Arthur J Trust Schedule :042815 Site :5300 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Parcel :39 162 00 001 Mail :5300 Quail St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Xferd :10/30/2002 LandUse :1112 Res,Improved Land Price TaxDist :3113 OwnerPh Bedrm:6 Bth:3.25 YB:1924 Parking: Firepl: TotArea:3,020 Ac:3.70 # 5 ' MetroScan / Jefferson • Owner :Aho Arthur J Trust Schedule :042815 Site :5300 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Parcel :39 162 00 001 Mail :5300 Quail St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Xferd :10/30/2002 LandUse :1112 Res,Improved Land Price TaxDist :3113 OwnerPh Bedrm:l Bth:3.25 YB:1980 Parking: Firepl: TotArea:1,263 Ac:3.70 # 6 * ' MetroScan / Jefferson • Owner :Koellner Kristina Schedule :435788 Site :10836 W 55th Ln Wheat Ridge 80002 Parcel :39 162 03 022 Mail :10836 W 55th Ln Wheat Ridge Co 80002 Xferd :01/31/2002 LandUse :1112 Res,Improved Land Price :$287,200 TaxDist :1013 OwnerPh Bedrm:3 Bth:1.75 YB:2002 Parking:Attached Firepl:l TotArea:2,082 Ac:.19 # 7 : MetroScan / Jefferson ' Owner :Appelhanz Robert M Schedule :435792 Site :10795 W 54th Ln Arvada 80002 Parcel :39 162 03 039 Mail :10795 W 54th Ln Arvada Cc 80002 Xferd :03/29/2002 LandUse :1112 Res,Improved Land Price :$308,400 TaxDist :1013 OwnerPh Bedrm:3 Bth:2.25 YB:2002 Parking:Attached Firepl:l TotArea:2,527 Ac:.12 # 8 : MetroScan / Jefferson • Owner :Hammer Michael H Schedule :435793 Site :10815 W 54th Ln Arvada 80002 Parcel :39 1.62 03 038 Mail :10815 W 54th Ln Arvada Cc 80002 Xferd :03/29/2002 LandUse :1111 Vacant,Residential Price :$295,600 TaxDist :1013 OwnerPh Bedrm: Bth: YB: Parking: Firepl: TotArea: Ac:.17 # 9 MetroScan / Jefferson • Owner :Cordova John T Schedule :435795 Site :10855 W 54th Ln Arvada 80002 - Parcel :39 162 03 036 . Mail :10855 W 54th Ln Arvada Co 80002 Xferd :03/21/2002 LandUse :1111 Vacant,Residential Price :$293,000 Tax Dist :1013 OwnerPh - Bedrm: Bth: YB: Parking: Firepl: TotArea: Ac:.17 f(D Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. # 10 Owner Site Mail LandUse TaxDist Bedrm:3 MetroScan / :Albert Edward :5621 Oak Ct Arvada 80002 :5621 Oak Ct Arvada Co 80002 :1112 Res,Improved Land 1062 Bth:1.75 YB:2002 Parking:Attached Jefferson Schedule Parcel Xferd Price OwnerPh Firepl:l :435809 :39 161 04 052 :01/24/2002 :$323,700 TotArea:1,766 Ac:.24 Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. C enter Y R R 390 5 G 0 30 W 5 6~ 3>9 6T 47 pni 39 - 161- 00- 0 i l 3Y 1- A UN NUMBERED LOT I OI 002 003 m CONTAINER PT. OF COORS PLANNED INDUSTRIAL N a SYSTEMS M M N N MINOR DEVELOPMENT FLG.I AMENDMENT 2 SUB. SUB. 3 0 0 N 1- e N 004 $4= 2 1 0 Ol M CT S69°43'19". 9 - p ® 1 1.' 1 _ a CITY OF WHE0.i PoOGE 2163-136 g Ai 8111111 C 'o L & K INDUSTRIAL PARK AMENDE D. W. 50 1 h t-B t-A Avenue. 46272P 19150' 21936 39025, Q O 3 Q 4 02 Q 001 002 n - 02 i3 93 006 n L a K IN DUSTRIAL PA K a a 166 ifi O 2 '96.33' N n AMENDMENT 0 6 SUB. 6 406 q N 03 IA G .o a 51 STATE OF COLORADO 51 STATE OF COLORADO °1 31 1492- 38 of 1 wl :v I U) ~ N M ° IY1 0 O Z $I 1 ~I I I I I STATE 141''. R 1 C• i - ool I 002 48-8 06 47-8 / - r 06y.• 46- B 5 02`. r 4 026 7• ® y3•z 027 \ 2 IS \IN ~ 31 I 113. 120.9 ~e 16 7 54 07 6 1 7 02 ra 14 03 a 012 N 89° 35 E sOO• 081 58-A w.1 .40 P. 56-B TOF 067 O 59-A 80-A Ky OB ,H O OB 091 - yl; g2CipE 57-B 8 r 58-8 8 C 59-8 60-B (ga 02 ~ 25/2 ' r.5v 55 9 d ~ Pl Plate _ © I O BB Sq. 61.33' 69.66' 71.53' I AMD b 70 PT, F SKYLI N ESTAT S FW.N . . 020 102 ~ 88 - 101 m 68 100 67 66 ® ® o ' 65 _ 09 0 a 12 I1 ~ ~ c - - N ti TI. BT 018111 1 102.06• 69.6 69.71' 69.65 71.55 ' Z ;ACT T 018 O51 TRACT V-B P 70ce 0 n39' 40~ 41 43 44 O61 I ~ 4- 38 ® 51 OS 05 / m ar / 0 O_ ~ 63Od ez.eY 53• ' 65.0 83.00 65 _ "i _ AT ES G. RDI MD / _ _ West ° 54th Ploc e 7 6 S 4 3 2 - 46 L a5.91 MOD DO $3.90 144 ® 142 141 140 139 13 Y 30' 30' 37 - MOD 51.73' f ® , 36 = 35 34 33 32 ° 31 't 30 54t h A ve _ 33 . 142. _ ~ T NA01 R-A 36 West 54th .N Ave - STATE OF COLORADO li l 39-161-00-003 33.06 663.26 4 c0 1 03 00 00l 51 M rn c STATE OF COLORADO c O_ 82 1- 739 V Q 39- 161-00-001 56 0 002 659 T' 45 0~ 003 447' M/L 76 ® o07 b1 yl ffi 95 I b LL O ~ r 44] M/1. z 10 C~ o~ 12 T° F~ped 5 MetroScan / Jefferson Schedule :042821 Bldg of AssdLand :$171,880 Parcel :39 161 00 001 S :16 T :03S R :69W Q:NE AssdStrc :$2,137,790 Owner :State Of Colorado AssdTotl :$2,309,670 CoOwner ActlLand :$592,690 Site :10285 Ridge Rd Wheat Ridge 80033 ActlStrc :$7,371,680 Mail :3550 W Oxford Ave Denver Co 80236 ActlTOtl :$7,964,370 Xfered :12/17/1986 Doc # :158518 PrYrLnd :$171,880 Price :$44 Deed :Warranty - PrYrStr :$2,137,790 Loan Amt Loan PrYrTOtl :$2,309,670 VestType IntRt PrActlLnd :$592,690 Lender PrActlStr :$7,371,680 Land Use :9129 Exempt,State,Land PrActlTotl :$7,964,370 Sub/Plat % Imprvd :93 Blk&Lot s Owned Neighbad 403 2002 Tax Tax Dist :1062 OwnerPhn Pierson :15 E Census Tract :103.08 Block :3 Bedrms Total SF :380,869 Year Blt :1958 LotAcre :123.47 Bathrms : BsmtSF Style LotSgFt 5,378,702 TotalRm :35 Porch Units :35 Parking Cooling : Porch SF Fireplce ParkgSF Heating . - Deck SF Pool Jacuzzi X crInformation compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge PLANNING COMMISSION on July 17, 2003, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the Municipal Building at 7500 West 291h Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. The following petitions shall be heard: Case No. WZ-02-13: An application filed by Melody Homes, Inc. for approval of a rezoning from Agricultural-One (A-1) to Planned Residential Development (PRD) and Planned Industrial Development (PID) and approval of an outline & final development plan for property located at 10285 Ridge Road. Said property is legally described as follows (see legal description for Case No. WS-02-01): Case No. WS-02-01: An application filed by Melody Homes, Inc. for approval of a 38-lot major subdivision plat for property located at 10285 Ridge Road. Said property is legally described as follows (the following legal description pertains to both cases): THE STATE OF COLORADO, STATE BOARD OF LAND COMMISSIONERS, BEING THE OWNER OF REAL PROPERTY CONTAINING 17.67 ACRES DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ALL THAT PART OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO, LYING NORTH OF THE COUNTY ROAD KNOWN AS RIDGE ROAD, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 16, THENCE NORTH 00° 13'l 1 " WEST, ON AND ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4, A DISTANCE OF 71.25 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF RIDGE ROAD, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 00°13' 11" WEST ON AND ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4, A DISTANCE OF 1246.20 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4; THENCE NORTH 89°35'34" EAST, ON AND ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, A DISTANCE OF 665.06 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4; THENCE SOUTH 00°12'59" EAST, ON AND ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, A DISTANCE OF 1068.47 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID RIDGE ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 74°38'30" WEST, ON AND ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 688.90 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 769,656 SQUARE FEET (17.67 ACRES) MORE OR LESS. Kathy Field, Administrative Assistant ATTEST: Wanda Sang, City Clerk To Be Published: Wheat Ridge Transcript Date: July 3, 2003 NN KIRKHAM MICHAEL Arizona + Colorado Iowa + Kansas • Nebraska CONSULTING ENGINEERS Ms. Mary Austin, AICP Planner City of Wheat Ridge 7500 West 29`s Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 RE: Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 Major Landfill and Excavation Control Plan Dear Ms Austin: www.kirkham.com June 20, 2003 This information is prepared for the City of Wheat Ridge review and is for necessary site activities that Melody homes, Inc. agrees to cortunence at their own risk prior to final project approvals. Enclosed are the following: Application a. A certified ALTA Survey is enclosed. b. A listing of adjoining owners to Skyline Estates Filing three is enclosed c. The enclosed Grading and Erosion Control Plans indicate the areas to be filled and/or excavated. This is the entirety of Skyline Estates Filing 3. d. A drainage report and map has been enclosed. e. Two points of ingress and egress will be utilized for this work. One from West 54'" Avenue and one froin Ridge Road. Final locations of these points will be determined in the field. f. An aerial photograph has been enclosed indicating the existing vegetation, which is minimal. The Grading and Erosion Control Plans indicate the vegetation after completion. g. An aerial photograph has been enclosed indicating the surrounding property and existing structures. Jr. The enclosed Grading and Erosion Control Plans indicate the existing fencing. i. The enclosed Grading and Erosion Control Plans indicate the existing roadways adjacent to the site. j. The final development will have standard residential lighting as installed in Skyline Estates Filing 1. There is no existing lighting on site. k. Site preparation, earthwork material importing, and erosion control is expected to commence the week of July 14. 2003. It is anticipated that this work will have about a three-month duration. 1. One copy each of the State Dust Control Permit and the State Stormwater Permit are attached. 2. A certificate relating to the insurance requirements will be filed by a separate document by Melody Homes, Inc. 5600 South Quebec Street + Suite 200 D • Greenwood Village, CO 80111 • (303) 694-2300 • FAX (303) 694-2822 NN Page 2 of 2 3. Melody Homes, Inc. expects that all equipment shall be maintained and operated utilizing standard items, such as mufflers, filters, etc., as much as possible to reduce noise, vibration, dust, etc., which could be injurious or substantially annoying to persons living in the vicinity. 4. Hours of operation shall be between 7:00 AM and 5:00 PM. This application is intended for the City to allow Melody Homes, Inc. to commence importing approximately 75,000 CY of earthwork material for Skyline Estates Filing No. 3. This request is a follow-up to Steve Wilson's letter of June 5, 2003, regarding tree removal and telephone conversations with Allan White. Melody Homes, Inc. desires to reach an agreement with the City regarding early commencement of the earthwork activities at the sole risk of Melody Homes, Inc. Overall there is a benefit to the City as the net effect will be a properly graded and stabilized property with acceptable drainage. As indicated in the mentioned letter of June 5, 2003, the earthwork has already commenced for Skyline Estates Filing 2. Since the source for the material is the same for both Filings 2 and 3 it is extremely critical to establish continuous construction for both projects. It is our understanding that the City will require a short review, and then schedule the application for Planning Commission and subsequent City Council consideration. A representative from melody homes, Inc. will contact you to discuss this matter and the dates for planning Commission and City Council consideration. We trust this submittal will allow for approval by the City of Wheat Ridge. Should there be any additional concerns, please contact either myself at 303-694-2300 ext. 320, or Darrel Pennington of Melody Homes Inc. at 303-785-4035. KIRKHAM MICHAEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS William Curtis Archdeacon PE, PLS Division Manager Colorado Land Development Cc: Darrel Pennington, Melody Homes Katie Christopher, Kirkham Michael KM File M0203120 Eric]: as noted above i N M KIRKHAM W vuQ MICHAEL Arizona • Colorado Iowa • Kansas • Nebraska CONSULTING ENGINEERS Ms. Mary Austin, AICP Planner City of Wheat Ridge 7500 West 29m Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 RE: Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 Response to May 23, 2003 Technical Review Comments Dear Ms Austin: www.kirkham.com June 12, 2003 The following response addresses the May 23, 2003 comments made by the City of Wheat Ridge staff relating to the Outline Development Plan, Final Development Plan, and Final Plat (the Planning Documents) for Skyline Estates Filing No. 3. It is our understanding that this submittal will allow for processing towards approval of the Planning Documents. Comments included in your May 23, 2003 comments not pertaining to the Planning Documents will be addresses at a later date as noted herein. This response follows the format of the comments. The following is being submitted with this response: 1. Red-lined plan comments 2. Outline Development Plan (3 sets) 3. Final Development Plan (3 sets) 4. Final Plat (3 sets) 5. Melody Homes Inc. check #20986 in the amount of $3,487.50 for review fees. We understand that these will be forwarded to the following agencies or departments for approval: 1. Planning 2. Public Works PLANNING 1. No response required. 2. Melody Homes, Inc. will hold the Streetscape Maintenance Agreement until such time as plat and development plan documents have received final approval. 3. Melody Homes, Inc. will hold the application for the Minor Dumping/Landfill Permit until such time as plat and development plan documents have received final approval. 4. Melody Homes, Inc. will construct that portion of the Columbine Basin that is included within the limits of Skyline Estates Filing No. 3. It is understood that this channel will be within a 35' drainage easement and that maintenance of this channel will fall on the owners of the respective lots. 5600 South Quebec Street • Suite 200 D • Greenwood Village, CO 80111 • (303) 694-2300 • FAX (303) 694-2822 NN Page 2 of 5 5. Melody Homes, Inc. will construct the improvements to Ridge Road with the first phase of the project. It is understood that the maintenance of the tree lawn area for Ridge Road will fall on the owners of the respective lots. Outline Development Plan 1. Tracts A and B have been eliminated and shown as 35-foot drainage easements for the Columbine Basin. 2. "Streetscape and Architectural Design Manual" has been italicized. 3. The blanks have been filled in. 4. Melody Homes, Inc. will construct the improvements to Ridge Road with the first phase of the project and the Development Schedule language has been modified. 5. Melody Homes, Inc. will construct the improvements to Ridge Road with the first phase of the project and the Ownership/Unified Control Statement has been modified. 6. Tracts A and B have been eliminated and shown as 35-foot drainage easements for the Columbine Basin. The Tract Information Table has been modified. 7. The Statistical Information Table has been modified as requested. 8. The Residential Standards Notes have been modified as requested. 9. The Residential Standards Notes have been modified as requested. 10. Melody Homes, Inc. is proposing a compromise with respect to brick/stone wainscoting return request applying to Residential Standards Note 3. Their preference is to incorporate additional trim, variations in siding, and fencing enhancements to alleviate monotonous side house elevations on corner lots and lots adjoining open spaces. To that end, Residential Standards Note 3 has been modified. 11. Melody Homes, Inc. would like to allow for a 2.5-foot stagger ranging from 20 feet, 22.5 feet, and 25 feet. To that end, Residential Note No. 4 has been modified. 12. This comment has been incorporated under Residential Note No. 5. 13. The Residential Standards Table has been modified as requested. 14. The first floor of the front elevation shall have a minimum of 50% brick or stone with a four-foot return of decorative wainscoting on either side of the home. 15. The Permitted Uses table has been modified as requested. 16. The Lot Information Table has been modified as requested. Final Development Plan 1. Melody Homes, Inc. will construct the improvements to Ridge Road with the first phase of the project. The section has been revised to clearly indicate the tree lawn area. 2. Melody Homes, Inc. will construct the improvements to Ridge Road with the first phase of the project. 3. Trees along Ridge Road will be 3" caliper placed every 30 feet within the tree lawn area. 4. The Development Schedule has been modified as requested. 5. The Development Standards Table has been modified as requested. 6. The Residential Standards shown on the Outline Development Plan have been replicated on the Final Development Plan as requested. 7. This point relating to temporary structures is clearly understood by Melody Homes, Inc. 8. The Notary signature has been modified as requested. NN Page 3 of 5 9. The first floor of the front elevation shall have a minimum of 50% brick or stone with a four-foot return of decorative wainscoting on either side of the home. 10. While no centralized postal delivery service is anticipated, if during negotiations centralized postal service is required, Melody Homes, Inc. will coordinate locations so as to avoid conflicts with new residential homes within the community. It is highly likely that open space tracts would be utilized for these purposes. 11. A signature line has been added as requested. 12. All plant material is labeled by species and size on the landscape plans as requested 13. A hatch pattern has been added to the landscape plan to illustrate proposed undisturbed areas as requested. 14. The note has been removed as requested. 15. Melody Homes, Inc. will construct the improvements to Ridge Road with the first phase of the project. It is understood that the maintenance of the tree lawn area and right-of- way landscaping for Ridge Road will fall on the owners of the respective lots. 16. A note has been added regarding inclusion into an established HOA as requested. 17. The street light locations have been shown on the signing and striping plan as requested. 18. Typical front yard plans revised as requested. The builder will offer, as an option, landscape irrigation on the lot. 19. The detached walk was revised and labeled on the landscape plan as requested. 20. The detached walk was added as requested. 21. As per discussion with the City staff, attached 5-foot sidewalks will be constructed along internal local streets. Final Plat 1. The Case History Box has been removed from sheets 2 and 3. 2. Tracts A and B have been eliminated and shown as 35-foot drainage easements for the Columbine Basin. 3. The Area Data Table has been corrected. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Drainage Report (Discussion) These issues will be addressed with other engineering issues at a later date. Drainage Report (Appendix) These issues will be addressed with other engineering issues at a later date. Drainage Plan These issues will be addressed with other engineering issues at a later date. Storm Sewer Plan These issues will be addressed with other engineering issues at a later date. Grading & Erosion Control Plan These issues will be addressed with other engineering issues at a later date. Page 4 of 5 Street Construction Plan These issues will be addressed with other engineering issues at a later date. Surveying... Final Plat 1. "City of Arvada" has been changed to "City of Wheat Ridge" as requested. 2. Missing distance has been added and incorrect distance corrected as requested. 3. Data has been corrected as requested. 4. The reception number has been added as requested. 5. Note has been modified as requested. 6. Melody Homes, Inc. will construct that portion of the Columbine Basin that is included within the limits of Skyline Estates Filing No. 3. It is understood that this channel will be within a 35' drainage easement and that maintenance of this channel will fall on the owners of the respective property. 7. The words "Final Plat" have been moved as requested. 8. The usage has been changed as requested. 9. It has been so noted regarding the 5' sidewalk easement as requested. 10. Easement size has been corrected as requested. 11. The reception number has been added as requested. 12. Certain bearings and distances have been modified as requested. 13. This has been made more legible as requested. 14. The bearing has been modified as requested. 15. The elevation has been added as requested. 16. Note has been added as requested. 17. Eight (8) right-of-way monuments will be set as requested. Surveying... Final Development Plan 1. Melody Homes, Inc. will construct that portion of the Columbine Basin that is included within the limits of Skyline Estates Filing No. 3. It is understood that this channel will be within a 35' drainage easement and that maintenance of this channel will fall on the owners of the respective property. 2. The call-outs for Lots 2 and 3, Block 3 have been modified as requested. 3. Melody Homes, Inc. will construct the improvements to Ridge Road with the first phase of the project. 4. A Professional Surveyor's certification has been added as requested. 5. The bearing has been modified as requested. 6. The Tract Designation Table has been modified as requested. 7. The note has been added as requested. Traffic En ineering These issues will be addressed with other engineering issues at a later date. Transportation Planning These issues will be addressed with other engineering issues at a later date. NN Page 5 of 5 Melody Homes, Inc. understands the noted procedures and conditions for the Subdivision Improvement Agreement, Minor Dumping/Landfill Permit, Public Improvements Cost Estimate and Guarantee, and Right-of-Way Construction Permit(s)/Licensing. We trust this response plus the attached plans will allow for planning approval by the City of Wheat Ridge. Should there be any additional concerns, please contact either myself at 303-694- 2300 ext. 320, or Darrel Pennington of Melody Homes Inc. at 303-785-4035. KIRKHAM MICHAEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS U✓,r,~r~i~u~s C~r~,~,,,, William Curtis Archdeacon PE, PLS Division Manager Colorado Land Development Cc: Darrel Pennington, Melody Homes Katie Christopher, Kirkham Michael KM File M0203120 Encl: as noted in letter JUN-10-03 TUE 12:42 PF MELODY HONES, INC. FAH N( 303 466 2368 P. 01 moody i4ommes Inc. uO.n. IIORTOM COMPANY Juno 10, 2003 Mr. Alan White Director of Community Development City of Wheat Ridge Re: Skyline 11 Grading Activities VIA FAX 30-3 7-34- 7,8V7 Dcar Alan, The City of Arvada has requested that Mclody Homes, Inc., provide the City of Wheat Ridge "a ledpr guaranteeing that (Melody) will provide erosion control for that area in the city (Wheat Ridge) that may be disturbed unPil pennanent vegetation is established". Arvada is referring to the fact that the (temporary) fill slope on the easlem boundary of Skyline 11. may spill a few feet onto the Skyline 111 property in Wheat Ridge. I'lcase consider this letter that commitment. We have the permission of the Sky III owner for this grading and have received a Stornnvater Construction permit from the State of Colorado for this work. If you have any questions regarding the grading and land development work on the Skyline 11 property, please call Mr. Craig Houser, I,and Development Superintendent at 303 472 0949. Sincerely, Asou VP Community Planning CC: Gary Hunmond, City of Arvada R ITollard; VP Land Development, Melody Homes 11031 Sharidrin Boulo,,vd o Westininster, CO 80020 o 303.466,1831 a Fax 303.466.1838 o www.melodyhomesinc.com JUN-05-03 THU 08:47 Ar MELODY HOMES, INC, FAX Nf' 303 466 2368 P. 01 w Ju MeIcW Homes Inc. s O.R MORTON COMPANY nc 5, 2003 Mr. Alan White Director of Community Development City of Wheat Ridge VIA FAX 303 235 2857 Ito: Troo Removal; "Skyline ]1I" Dear Alan, It is my understanding that the City of Wheat Ridge has requested we remove and "grind" or mulch the remaining trees from this parcel because of City concerns about disease. This request was etude after we granted the City of Wheat Ridge the opportunity to romove and transplant any healthy trees the City believed would benefit the City. We have scheduled the requested tree removal and "m.ulching" for the begimning of the week of Junc 9. We also plan on cleaning up the sito by removing all trash and slash piles. We hope that this work will go a long ways toward eliminating potential fire hazards and the illegal dumping ilia[ has been plaguing this properly for years. We arc not aware of any City regulation that would not allow us to proceed with cleaning up our site; still, wo want to be sure that we are all informed and in agreement as we move ahead with this work. If the City does not want us to proceed with this work as proposed, please let me know ASAP. We also want to let you know that beginning; 3une 9, we are also beginning fiill grading, over excaval ion, and installation of utilities on our Skyline 11 community iu Arvada. As you know, Skyline IT is adjacent on the west to our Wheat Ridge Skyline III property. We are giving you a "head's up" nboid this work in case you recoive any inquiries about this activity. If you have any questions about our work, please call Craig Flouser, our Skyline Land Development Superintendent at 303 472 0949. Craig also asked me to sec if it would be possible for us to temporarily store some of the soil Ji•oni the Skyline 11 property on a portion of Skyline III near Ridge Road, as Craig works the Arvi& Skyline 11 property. 1 believe that Wheat Ridge regulations allows up to 20,000 cu. yds. of fill with [lie approval of a permit by the Wheat Ridge engineer, We would also obtain all necessary storm water and fugitive dust permits. Please let us know if any other City icquirements apply. Thank yon for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, S 'VU 11SOR VP Community Planning Cc: R. I lollard; VP Land Development C. Trouser; Superintendent 11031Shedd3nSOUI:vard 0 Westminsler,CO 80020 . 303.466.1831 . Fx303.466.1638 o www.melodyllomesinc.com JUN-02-03 MON 02:17 PM, MELODY HOMES, INC. FAX NC 303 466 2368 P. 01/01 Melody Hones inc. ' N P.F<. 110A TON COMYAIYY -Anc 2, 2003 Mr. Alan White Director o f Qonutlunily Development City of Whcat Ridge Re: Excavation and hill/Prc Development Grading, Ridge Home/Skyline III VIA FAX: 303 235 2857 Dcur Alan, W horber developed for the residential uses we propose or for sons; other use in the future, this particular rile will require die addition of approximately 65,000 cu. yards of fill material. This fill is necessary primal ily to insure proper grades and drainage. The depth of fill is not excessive. We estimate the maYimuni depth to be approximately 3-4 feet, just enough to eliminate any pending on site and to bring the southern end of Sky TTI to the approximate level of Ridge Road, Because of the relatively low amount of 1-111 Ave do not anticipate this action creating any si„niricant negative impacts on adjoining properties. This qua nlity of fill is similar to that approved by the City of Arvada for out Skyline 11 property. We have a show t window of opportunity to bring in fill tl'om rho impending development of the multi family silo in the Skyline development in Arvada. This site is located just off Miller Road to the west of the water tanks. This mnterial must be moved in the next ctniplc of months. The proximity of this source lunits the impacts of inoe hug this material to just the immediate neighborhood and local streets in Arvada. It is unlikely that any Wheat Ridge neighborhoods or streets would be affected. `:Silo doveopment" is not allowed under Wheat Ridge rcgulalions ($ec. 26.103) "exceot in accordance wish (other) approvals listed in the review process chart". A URc By Special is a listed approval that can apply to and control onr proposal for ilia grad big of this situ. From our review of Wheat Ridge mgulationa, tvc belie vo that on site grading, excavation acid fill can bo permitted on ilia Skyline III site as a Use By Special Povicw under Sections 26-114 and 26.623 of wheat nudge municipal codes. We believe that the grading of this site is not only allowed unclar your codes but that it makes sense for both the properly owner artd the City. Tlrc City has already asked us to remove the trees from this site bocame of concerns about disease. The area has become a site for illegal dumping; grading the site would resµh in the removal of existing trash and slash piles and discourage future dumping. India worst case, should Melody somehow not proceed with the development of a residential community on this site, the City would have a clean, secure, well-drained and stabilized site that is prepared for future development as tho City may determine appropriate. If you concur with our plain reading the Wheat Ridge Codes please let me know. We will immediately begin pr:paration of a Use By Special Application and all supporting documentation. 'thank you for your attention to this matter. SincerclX Steve Wilsmt VP Community Planning 1103191ieridan2otIhQrd s Westminsler,C0 80020 9 303,466.1831 a Fax303.466.1836 a www.melodyhomesinc.com 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 303/ 235-2846 Fax: 303/235-2857 The City of Wheat Ridge May 23, 2003 Darrell Pennington Melody Homes 11031 Sheridan Boulevard, Suite A Westminster, Colorado 80020-3258 RE: Skyline Estates Filing 3 - Second Submittal Dear Mr. Pennington: I have completed my review of the re-submitted documents for the above-mentioned project, and I have the following comments: General: 1. Comments from the Department of Public Works are included. Any questions regarding those comments should be directed to that department. 2. The signed streetscape maintenance agreements are being returned. There is no need to execute them until after final approval of the plat and development plan documents. They were provided by the Public Works staff as a sample for information purposes only at this time. 3. The signed application for minor dumping/landfill permit is being returned. The permit is not required until after final approval of the plat and development plan documents. It was provided by the Public Works staff as a sample for information purposes only at this time. 4. Accommodating the Columbine Basin along the north side of Ridge Road seems to remain an issue with respect to ownership and maintenance of the area. Staff offers the following solution: Neither the City of Wheat Ridge nor the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD) will accept the dedication of Tracts A and B. Tracts A and B should be eliminated and integrated into the adjacent parcels (Tract C, Tract H, and the Industrial Lot). A 35-foot "Drainage Easement" will be provided along the southerly boundary of that property, adjacent to Ridge Road. This drainage easement will accommodate the Columbine Basin channel and provide for access to the channel, if necessary. The property owners of those Tracts and Lot will be responsible for maintaining that area. Please make the appropriate modifications to all drawings, tables, and calculations on the Outline Development Plan, Final Development Plan, and the Final Plat. 5. Improvements along Ridge Road continue to be an unresolved issue. The City's Subdivision Regulations require that improvements of curb, gutter, detached sidewalk, landscaping improvements and open drainage channels (Columbine Basin) be constructed by the developer. This construction shall occur during the first phase of the project. The Ridge Road improvements need to be included in the itemized cost estimate of public improvements that will be part of the subdivision improvement agreement (SIA). The SIA will identify the owners of Tract C, Tract H and the Industrial Lot as being responsible for maintaining the adjacent Ridge Road tree lawn area. The SIA will be recorded with the final plat. Outline Development Plan: 1. With the changes to Tracts A and B, please make all appropriate modifications to drawings, tables and notes. 2. In the Development Standards table on sheet 2, column: Industrial, item: Architecture, the document should be correctly referenced as the Streetscape and Architectural Design Manual and either italicized or underlined. 3. In the Development Standards table on sheet 2, column: Residential, items: Min. Lot Size and Mn. Lot Width, please fill in the blanks by providing numbers reflecting what is being proposed. 4. The Development Schedule language needs modification. All public improvements of curb, gutter, sidewalk and tree lawn shall be completed on all streets, including Ridge Road, with the first phase of the project. 5. The table under the Ownership/Unified Control Statement indicates that the Ridge Road right-of-way improvements will be built by the City as needed. This statement needs correction as it is not the responsibility of the City to construct these improvements. 6. The Tract information table on sheet 2 needs to be modified to reflect changes to Tracts A and B. 7. In the Statistical Information Table on sheet 2, please specify calculations for both net and gross residential density. Also provide the square footage amount used in those calculations. 8. There are no elevations or plans required with the Outline Development Plan. Therefore, item #1 under Residential Standards should refer to "...elevations included as paft e€ this daeument on the Final Development Plan." And "...plans included in this deeufnen the Final Development Plan." 9. Item #2 under Residential Standards should read "Residential Structures on eeffi lots adjacent..." 10. Item #3 under Residential Standards needs to state that the "return" of decorative wainscoting shall run the entire length of the side of the structure. Also the last sentence should read, "...plans included in this n the final development plan." 11. Item #4 under Residential Standards needs to state that there shall be a minimum stagger of 5 feet between adjacent structures, as previously requested. 12. Please add an item under residential Standards that states: "There shall not be two garage dominant models constructed on adjacent lots." 13. With the minimum front yard setback being reduced from 30 feet to 20 feet, note #6 under Residential Standards, allowing additional encroachments, needs to be deleted. Encroachment for "porches, decks, patios and balconies" can be added to the list of architectural features in item #7, allowing for a maximum of 30 inches. 14. The Residential Standards need to be specific regarding the minimum percentage of brick or stone that will be provided on the homes. 15. Under Permitted Uses for the PRD residential zoning, please eliminate "The residential uses may be defined by simply stating:...". The comment from the first review was meant to be instructionary. 16. The Lot Information table on sheet 2 has the acreage numbers for block 1 and block 3 transposed. Final Development Plan Review: 1. For the Ridge Road Improvements Typical Section on sheet 2, please remove "future" from the title as well as the reference "To be constructed by others". The developer of the subdivision in the first project phase shall complete the Ridge Road improvements. Staff will not support a deferment of this requirement to an unknown time in the future. This section also needs to clearly depict the required tree lawn. 2. The site plan needs to show the required public improvements along Ridge Road. Staff will not endorse deferring this to be constructed "by others". 3. A detached sidewalk and tree lawn, consistent with the cross-section, is required along Ridge Road. This must be shown on the FDP. Ridge Road is identified as a streetscape corridor in the City's Streetscape and Architectural Design Manual. For that reason, street trees along Ridge Road are required to be a minimum of 3 inches in caliper. These street trees are required at the rate of 1 tree for every 30 feet of frontage or portion thereof. 4. The Development Schedule language needs modification. All public improvements of curb, gutter, sidewalk and tree lawn shall be completed on all streets, including Ridge Road, with the first phase of the project. 5. Since the industrial lot is not part of this Final Development Plan, the Development Standards Table does not need to include industrial information. The note underneath the table is sufficient for addressing the industrial lot. A comparison for the residential standards is needed between the requirements established on the Outline Development Plan and what is being provided on this Final Development Plan. 6. Please replicate the Residential Standard notes established on the Outline Development Plan onto the Final Development Plan. 7. The response letter states that temporary or interim uses of land or buildings has not been determined. Be advised that any temporary uses or buildings, with the exception of temporary construction trailers, will not be permitted if not identified. 8. Since it is the owner's signature on the cover page that is being notarized, please place the notary section below the Owner's Certification. 9. Please add a note to the first page of the typical elevations stating the minimum percentage of brick or stone that each home in Filing 3 will have. This figure must equal or exceed the figure established on the Outline Development Plan. 10. While staff realizes that Melody Homes does control the postal delivery process, the question was previously posed in order to determine if any centralized mail box location(s) needed to be accommodated. It is not unusual, during creation of a Final Development Plan for a residential project, to contact the post office to ascertain mail delivery requirements. 11. Under City Certification, please add a signature line for the Public Works Director. 12. The tree planting list and the shrub planting list include several species for each type. The landscape plan provides no identification of plant material by location. 13. The landscape plan still does not denote the ground cover for much of Tract C. The plan must identify the ground cover whether the area is disturbed or not. 14. The note at the bottom of sheet 14 regarding landscape improvements in Tracts A and B needs to be deleted. 15. Note #2 on sheet 4 should read: "...maintenance of the landscaping within the Ridge Road right-of-way is the responsibility of the adjacent property owner." 16. If the intent is to include the HOA for Filing 3 into the HOA for Filings 1 and 2, a note needs to be added to the plan stating that. 17. Since the street light design has been completed by Xcel Energy, please depict the actual locations of the street lights on sheet 11. Also, provide a detail of the fixture. 18. Please revise the typical front yard landscape illustration to show a minimum of 7 shrubs with a maximum spacing of 5 feet as in Filing 2. Also indicate if any irrigation is provided by the builder or is available as an option. 19. On the site plan please dimension the detached sidewalk along W. 54d' Ave. Also clearly show the sidewalk location on the landscape plan, as it does not appear to match the location shown on the site plan. 20. The W. 54 h Ave. typical street section needs to show the detached sidewalk. 21. The response letter states that attached sidewalks are being proposed in order to maintain consistency with Skyline Estates Filings 1 and 2. However, with the exception of two streets in Filing 2, all other streets are currently built or planned to be built with detached walks. The City's Streetscape and Architectural Design Manual promotes detached sidewalks where feasible. Ridge Road and W 54d' Ave. must be built with detached sidewalks. Attached walks along Newcombe St. and W 53rd Ave. will be acceptable. Since Nelson St. extends through this filing from W 54th Ave. to Ridge Rd., we would prefer to see detached walks similar to those along Parfet St in Filing 2. Plat Review: 1. The case history box is only needed on sheet 1 and can be removed from sheets 2 and 3. 2. Tracts A and B need to be revised per the recommended solution of incorporating them into the adjacent lot and tracts. Please make the appropriate modifications to drawings, tables and notes. Please review the figures in the Area Data Table on sheet 1. The table lists the average lot size as being smaller than the smallest lot size. Please make all required changes prior to resubmittal. You should be aware that any changes required by any other agencies might impact my comments. The City charges a re-submittal fee for any corrections required past the second submittal. The City's fee schedule imposes a charge of 1/2 of the application fee for the 3`d submittal. The application fee for this project was $6,975 (without publication fees) at the time of submittal. Therefore a re-submittal fee of $3,487.50 applies to the next submittal. Subsequent review can occur only when the re-submittal fee is paid. If any changes are required after the next submittal, the 4`s submittal fee will apply which is equal to the full amount of the original application fee. At the time of your next submittal, please submit three (3) full sets of plans for review. If you have any further questions, feel free to give me a call. I can be reached at: 303.235.2852. Sincerely, Mary Austin, AICP Planner, City of Wheat Ridge RIB ay of ! Departrnent of Public Works May 16, 2003 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (303) 235-2868 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 FAX (303) 235-2857 Mr. Kevin S. Roth, P.E. Kirkham Michael Consulting Engineers 5600 South Quebec Street, Suite 200D Englewood, Colorado 80111 Re: Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 - Second Review Comments of Final Drainage Study, Grading & Erosion Control Plan, Surveying Comments & Street Construction Plans. Dear Mr. Roth, I have completed the first review of the above referenced documents for the Skyline Estates Subdivision received on April 9, 2003, and have the following comments: Drainage Report (Discussion) 1. The southerly open channel along Ridge Road is currently included as part of Sub-Basin J, which covers approximately the westerly half of the Industrial Lot. The area of the open channel should be addressed separately from Sub-basin J. 2. The Industrial Lot was platted as part of the Skyline Estates Filing #3 Subdivision. Therefore, discuss the master plan for the (future) developed flows from the Industrial Lot, and include how future developed flows from the entire industrial lot will be handled, e.g., water quality issues, detention, how and where it is to release, the relationship to Pond H and storm sewer line O. 3. The street grades for Oak Street as shown on the drainage plan do not reflect the cross-section for irregular channel calculations. The Flowmaster© output for cross-section 1.30% Basin D indicates curb overtopping occurs across Lots 7,8 Block 3, but the Drainage Plan shows the street grade as 1.17% in this area and the Street Plan shows the street grade as 1.00% in this area. 4. An NPDES permit shall be obtained from the State of Colorado Department of Health - Water Quality Control Division. A signed copy of this permit is to be submitted to the City of Wheat Ridge. The City of Wheat Ridge is a Phase II municipality. 5. As the public improvements along the north side of Ridge Road will be required for this development, please include in the report the hydraulics for the Ridge Road frontage improvements. This is to include street capacity calculations, inlet locations, etc. 6. The Columbine Basin Study requires that the open channel in the Wheat Ridge section be constructed. The calculations for the channel need to be shown, and details shown as needed for construction purposes. Please include specific design details for the channel, consistent with the Columbine Basin Study e.g., grass-lined channel, and discuss anticipated flows, structures (culvert size, quantity, placement, etc.), and erosion control measures required to mitigate the anticipated flows. The open channel shall lie within a Drainage Easement; the homeowner's association for the Skyline Estates Filing #3 development shall retain the maintenance responsibility and title to the property. Please discuss the maintenance of the open channel area by the HOA. 7. The drainage ponds and open channel along the eastern portion of the site are subject to City Code, Section 26-412(C)(1)(g) which states that the following improvements shall be provided by the developer to the current Department of Public Works standards: Installation of landscaping in areas held in common by a subdivision's homeowners association. 8. The longitudinal channel slope of 0.85% as indicated in the report for the easterly open channel exceeds the UDFCD requirement of 0.60% for longitudinal slopes to maintain functional stability. Please discuss this, and the anticipated maximum velocity as well as any possible scouring effect in the report and plans. Label the surface type and channel lining (if applicable) to be placed in the open channel on the drawing as well as identifying it in the report. Please discuss the maintenance of the open channel that will be required by the HOA. The open channel shall be designed per UDFCD requirements using Volume 3 for the design and BMP requirements. 9. The discussion states the easterly open channel will carry the major flows for this development. Please discuss how the 48.2 cfs (Q100) release from Skyline Estates Filing #1 detention pond will affect (i.e., capacity, erosion, channel lining, etc.) the easterly open channel, the outfall on the southeast comer of the development, the adjacent detached sidewalk to the south (to be constructed), and the open channel/property to the east during a major storm. 10. Please discuss in the report the crossing of the Reno-Juchem Ditch with the Skyline Estates Filing #1 detention pond release (pipe) on the east side of the development, and any erosion and/or sedimentation issues that may occur in this area. 11. Discuss the off site runoff and the swale located on the southwesterly portion of the development (west side of the industrial lot) as shown on the Grading & Erosion Control Plan. Include the longitudinal grade, erosion considerations, surface type, channel lining, and maintenance of the Swale. 12. Please correct the spelling error in line 2 under the Site Description found on page 1 of the report (exiting needs to be changed to existing). 13. Please provide P.E. seal and signature on the final approved Report. Drainage Report (Appendix) 1. Due to the City requirement that public improvements along the north side of Ridge Road are to be constructed during this development, the appendix shall include calculations for the Ridge Road frontage improvements such as inlet calculations, locations, and proposed street capacity. 2. Please include calculations for anticipated (future) developed flows from the entire industrial lot and the approximate pond size that will be required (based on a developed site). Exclude the southerly open channel from the calculations. 3. Please include in the Basin K design information the effects of the 48.2 cfs (Q100) release from Skyline Estates Filing #1 detention pond upon the easterly open channel during the major storm. Also discuss the effect of the 48.2 cfs on the off site flow calculations for the 100 year storm. 4. Please provide P.E. seal and signature on the final approved Report. Drainage Plan 1. Unless the southerly open channel along Ridge Road is to be considered part of the Industrial Lot, the area of the open channel to the south should be addressed separately from Sub-basin J. 2. The approximate location of the future detention pond for the Industrial Lot should be shown on the Plan. 3. The Runoff Coefficients shown in the Legend are reversed as compared to the rest of the Plan 2 Sky1me_reviewlltr (the C5 coefficient should be on top). 4. Oak Street on the Drainage Plan is shown as Newcombe Street on the Street Plan. 5. Please include a cross-section B-B (to scale) for the southerly open channel, and a cross-section C-C (to scale) along the proposed Swale on the southwesterly side of the Industrial Lot as shown on the redline Drainage Plan. 6. Please re-draw the cross-section A-A to scale, to more accurately reflect the existing shape of the easterly channel. 7. Please provide a drainage plan for the Ridge Road improvements. 8. Please provide P.E. seal and signature on the final approved Plan. Public Works requires 2 signed and stamped sets of the Final Drainage Report and Plan. Please provide these with the next submittal. Storm Sewer Plans 1. Please correct the pipe size (36") on the typical detail for the 2-36" pipe under drain system along Ridge Road. It appears to be drawn as 18". 2. The inlet located at the southwest corner of Nelson and West 53 d Avenue needs to be in the sump area as redlined on the plans. The sump area is shown at station 10+37.13 (at the PCR) per the Detail for Cl l found on Sheet 5 of the Street Plans, and the inlet on the westerly side of Nelson St. is located at 10+40.29 on the Storm Sewer Plan. 3. Please label the streets on the Storm Sewer Plan. 4. Please provide a detail for the under drain system on the southwest comer of the development where it daylights into the southerly open channel along Ridge Road. Indicate if this is to be constructed during the Skyline Estates Filing #2 Development. 5. Include a typical cross-section for both the southerly and easterly channels as needed for construction purposes. 6. Need to add a note on storm sewer plans: Manhole lids are to be clearly identified as City Storm Sewer, Irrigation Ditch, or Sanitary Sewer. Grading & Erosion Control Plan 1. Please provide erosion control for the industrial site and include maintenance language on the plans. 2. The contour lines on the westerly side of the Industrial Lot need to be consistent with those of the Swale. 3. In the event the Denver Water Board and Valley Water District declare State 3 drought conditions and adopt rules prohibiting the placement and watering of sod, all areas for which sod was approved on the final development plan shall be protected with temporary erosion control solutions until approved permanent solutions may be placed. The Engineer of Record shall design and submit a temporary erosion control plan to the City of Wheat Ridge for approval and placement in the initial construction. The developer shall be responsible for maintaining all erosion control items. Should the drought conditions improve and the Board and District allow sod placement and watering, the approved landscape plan shall be fully implemented within 120 days of such decision by the Board or District. 4. The detail for Channel Section A-A (sheet 4) may have to be modified in response to the above comment #3 in the Drainage Study (Appendix). Skyline_reviewZltr Street Construction Drawings 1. Please include the improvements for the north side of Ridge Road into the construction plans. This is to include plan and profile sheets for the sections to be constructed for the frontage of Skyline Estates Filings #2 and 93 along the north side of Ridge Road (the south side improvements will be completed at a future time by others). 2. The Ridge Road Right-of-Way has been secured, so "future" can be removed from sheet #2 regarding the 60' of ROW. 3. Need to add a note on street construction plans: manhole lids are to be clearly identified as to City Storm Sewer, Irrigation Ditch, or Sanitary Sewer. 4. If street cross-slopes are to vary between I% and 4% as indicated by the standard section detail, a 3-line profile (centerline and lip lines) should be included in the street profile views, or cross- sections given every 50 feet for each roadway for construction purposes. 5. Include Ridge Road proposed street section. 6. Please include survey monument: the SW Comer of the NE'/< of Section 16, located on the south side of Ridge Road (please see the Point of Commencement on the Final Plat). Include the City supplied coordinate and elevation information for the monument as found on the Final Plat. 7. Need to add a note stating, "Street Right-of-Way monuments shall be set prior to placement of the final lift of asphalt pavement." 8. Please include baseline stations and double-check the elevation shown on the redline for Detail D found on Sheet #4. 9. Include bearings and distances for the boundary of the development. Also include distances from the SW boundary corner to 1+00 on the W. 53`a Ave. baseline, and also from the NW boundary corner to 1+00 on the W. 50 Ave. baseline for construction purposes. 10. City Code, Section 26-412(3)(a), requires the following: No subdivision or final plat shall be approved unless the plans and specifications of the subdivision provide that all, new utilities shall be placed underground. Surveying Comments Final Plat Remarks: 1. The adjoining property to the east lies in the City of Wheat Ridge, not Arvada. 2. There is a missing distance on Lot 3, Block 1, and an incorrect distance on Lot 1, Block 2 (please see redlined Plat). 3. Lots 2 & 3, Block 3 do not close; please double-check the dimensions (and curve data) for these. 4. The entire 60' of Right-of-Way should be noted on West 54`h Avenue if the north 30' has been granted. The Reception Number for the dedicated roadway area will need to be indicated. 5. Tracts A and B as shown on the graphical portion of the Plat and in Note #8 will need to be shown as Drainage Easements, and NOT dedicated to the City. Note 98 will need to modified to read, "Tracts A & B are Drainage Easements reserved for the construction and maintenance of drainage facilities. The ownership and maintenance of Tracts A & B is retained by the Skyline Estates Filing # 3 HOA and subsequent owners, heirs, successors, and assigns. In the event that such construction and maintenance is not performed by said owner, the City of Wheat Ridge shall have the right to enter such easement area and perform necessary work, the cost of which said owner, heirs, successors, and assigns agrees to pay. " Tracts A & B are rendered unnecessary due to the areas being easements. Tracts A & B could be re-incorporated back into the parcels lying to the north. Skyline_re"ewIltr 6. The Owner / Maintenance column in Note 410 for Tracts A & B needs to be modified to reflect the HOA as the owner and responsible for the maintenance of these Drainage Easement areas (not the City). 7. Please move the words Final Plat directly under the subdivision title (for clarity). 8. Tract F in Note #10 should have the usage of Open Space and Drainage. 9. The 5' strip allotted for the sidewalk along Ridge Road does not need to be dedicated as Right- of-Way, but rather as a 5' Sidewalk Easement for the purpose of the construction and maintenance of a sidewalk. Include a Note stating the above purpose. 10. The Lot Easement Detail should match Note #6 with a 10' easement granted on the front property line. 11. The Right-of-Way for Ridge Road has been granted and recorded at the County. Please include the Reception Number (F1738743) for the full 60' width of ROW dedication. 12. Some Bearing directions should be modified to create a more consistent flow around the platted lots (please see redlined Plat). 13. The line between Lots 5 & 6 Block 1 should be removed across Tract C, or if this line is needed to depict the drainage ROW, try a different linetype (dotted?) to clarify. 14. Please complete the bearing for the northerly line of Tract B (add the W for west). 15. Please include the elevation, 5435.07 (NGVD29), for the'/4 Section monument (Point of Commencement) on Sheet 2. 16. Please include the following Note on the Final Plat: a) A recorded Streetscape Maintenance Agreement shall be executed by the owner/ developer of the Skyline Estates Filing #3 Subdivision for the maintenance of the landscaping lying within the northerly 30' of the Ridge Road Right-of-Way. The maintenance shall remain the sole responsibility of the Homeowners Association (HOA) for the Skyline Estates Filing #3 Subdivision, and subsequent successors and assigns. 17. Eight (8) Right-of-Way monuments will need to be set at the following ROW centerline intersection points: a) Nelson Street and Ridge Road b) Nelson Street and West 53rd Avenue c) Nelson Street and Newcombe Street d) Nelson Street and 541i Avenue (City of Wheat Ridge boundary) e) West 53r1 Avenue and Newcombe Street I) West 53rd Avenue and the City boundary (on the west line ofNE'/4 Section 16) g) Two (2) will be required in the bubble on Newcombe Street: 1) at the south end of curve C6 as shown on the redlined Plat, and 2) at the radius point of the bubble. Please note the following requirements for ROW monuments: The monument type to be utilized will be a 3" diameter brass cap on a 30" pipe set inside a City of Wheat Ridge range box. The monuments shall be set under the supervision of a Professional Land Surveyor licensed in the State of Colorado per C.R. S. and City monumentation standards (please see attached sheets for City standards), with the top of the brass cap lying 6" below finished asphalt grade. The above-mentioned monuments shall be set, and the monument box adjusted prior to the final lift of asphalt. Upon completion of monumentation, the Professional Land Surveyor for the project shall provide to the City within thirty (30) calendar days, a letter of certification stating that the work has been completed in accordance with the approved City Monumentation Requirements. The letter of certification shall be written and stamped by the Professional Land Surveyor who performed the work. The City shall supply the monuments and range box hardware upon request. Skyline_review2.1tr Final Development Plan Remarks I. Tracts A and B are currently shown on the Plan as R.O.W. to be dedicated to the City of Wheat Ridge. Tracts A & B are to be shown as Drainage Easements, and include the Notes pertaining to Tracts A & B as shown on the Final Plat (see Final Plat Remark #5 above). 2. Lots 2 & 3, Block 3 as shown do not close. Adjust the boundaries of these per the Final Plat. 3. As the public improvements along Ridge Road will be required for this development, please modify the statement regarding "BY OTHERS" to read "SOUTH SIDE TO BE DONE BY OTHERS". 4. Please provide a signed Surveyor's Certification (for the Site Plan). 5. Please complete the bearing for the northerly line of Tract B (add the W for west). 6. In the Tract Designation Table: a. The use for Tract F should be Open Space and Drainage. b. Under the Ownership/Maintenance column, Tracts A & B should be HOA. 6. Please include the following Note on the Final Development Plan: A recorded Streetscape Maintenance Agreement shall be executed by the owner/ developer of the Skyline Estates Filing #3 Subdivision for the maintenance of the landscaping lying within the northerly 30' of the Ridge Road Right-of-Way. The maintenance shall remain the sole responsibility of the Homeowners Association (HOA) for the Skyline Estates Filing #3 Subdivision, and subsequent successors and assigns. Traffic Engineering A copy of the street construction plans and traffic impact study has been forwarded to the City's Traffic Engineer, Mr. Steve Nguyen, P.E. (303-235-2862) for review and has the following comments: I . The traffic impact study needs to be prepared and stamped by a Colorado Professional Engineer with experience in transportation engineering. 2. Oak Street is not physically connected or extended south of Ridge Road. Thus, traffic distribution and level of service may change at this and other nearby intersections. 3. The capacity summary tables (table 5 and 6) need to be clearly labeled for the intersections of Parfet, Nelson and Oak. 4. LOS for eastbound Ridge Road needs to be shown in Table 3, pg 7. 5. It appears that the Parfet Street connection will not be implemented at this time, but rather sometime in the future. Please provide two traffic distribution scenarios, one with the Parfet Street connection as proposed in Skyline Filing #2 and one without. Capacity and level of service calculations for the street network will also need to be included in the report to reflect the above scenarios. Address any impact from the changes as necessary. 6. Please show the level of service in Highway Capacity Manual values in the calculation sheets. ICU level of service values are optional. Transportation Planning A copy of the Street construction plans has been forwarded to the City's Transportation Planner, Mr. David Mentor (303-235-2866) for review and has the following comments: 1. Ridge Road is an identified streetscape corridor street and is subject to City Council's adopted Streetscape and Architectural Design Manual requirements. A copy of the Manual is available through the Planning Department for $10.00. 2. Please include information along Ridge Road that reflects the cross-section detail provided previously by the City Traffic Engineer. Various details related to the construction of curb, gutter, and detached sidewalk along Ridge Road are included in that cross section. (A copy of the cross section is attached). Skyline_reviev.2.1tr 3. In the treelawn, the developer shall install: • Irrigation system. • Turf (or other approved ground cover - see Streetscape Manual). • Street trees @35' - 40' spacing; 3" caliper (see Streetscape Manual for approved varieties). The Public Works Department requires 2 signed and stamped copies of the Traffic Impact Study, Storm Sewer Plans, Street Construction Plans, Grading & Erosion Control Plan, Final Development Plan, and Final Plat. Please provide these with the next submittal. Subdivision Improvement Agreement Upon City Council approval of the Final Plat, a Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) will need be executed by the project owner/developer. The City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Department will provide the SIA to the project owner/developer. Please note that there may be additions to this document for this development. Application for Minor Dumping/Landfill Permit Prior to the commencement of any onsite grading, an Application for Dumping/Landfill Permit, along with the fees due will need to be submitted for review and approval. This Permit is generally issued at the time of the Building Permit. Public Improvements Cost Estimate & Guarantee prior to any construction commencing for the required public improvements within the right-of-way, an itemized engineer's cost estimate will need to be submitted for review and approval. Upon acceptance of this estimate, a letter of credit reflecting total costs of the approved cost estimate plus 25% will need to be submitted by the owner/developer for review and approval. Right-of-Way Construction Permit(s)/Licensing Prior to any construction of the public improvements, the necessary Right-of-Way construction permit(s) and respective licensing will need to be submitted for processing by the City. Right-of-Way Construction Permits are issued only after approval of all required technical documents, including but not limited to; the Final Drainage Report & Plan, Final Plat, Final Development Plan, Traffic Impact Study, Storm Sewer Plans, Street Construction Plans, Grading & Erosion Control Plan, and easement or ROW dedications. A signed acceptance letter from the ditch company will be required prior to the issuance of any building permits. Please return all redlined prints with the third submittal. If you have any questions, please contact me at 303-235-2864. Skyhne_nv ewl tr Sincerely, David F. Brossman, P.L.S. Development Review Engineer Cc: Alan White, Director of Community Development Steve Nguyen, Engineering Manager Dave Mentor, Traffic Planner Mary Austin, Planner Darin Morgan, Code Administrator File SkyUne_mview2 ltr m D C J 4 Q Q b ~Q 1~ . µ J 1 w V Y Kirkham Michael Consulting Engineers . trensporh tion plenning & design • roedwey design Skyline Estates Filing #3 Traffic Impact Analysis Wheat Ridge, Colorado September 2002 Revised: March 2003 Prepared for: Melody Homes 11031 Sheridan Boulevard Westminster, Colorado 80020 Prepared by: Kirkham Michael Consulting Engineers 5600 S. Quebec Street, Suite 200D Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111 (303) 694-2300 l k H:\020312\traf\Mar03 Revision\tis.doc Skyline Estates Filing #3 Traffic Impact Analysis Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION t 1.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1.2 PURPOSE 1 1.3 PROJECT LOCATION 1 1.4 STUDY AREA 1 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3 2.1 EXISTING ROADWAY SYSTEM 3 2.2 PEDESTRIAN AND TRANSIT FACILITIES 4 2.3 TRAFFIC VOLUMES 4 2.4 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS 6 2.5 EXISTING TRAFFIC LOS ANALYSIS 7 3.0 PROPOSED LAND USE AND ROADWAY NETWORK 8 3.1 PROPOSED LAND USES 8 3.2 FUTURE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK 8 3.3 SITE ACCESS 9 4.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS 11 4.1 SITE TRAFFIC 11 4.2 PROJECT GENERATED TRIP DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT 12 4.3 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC 14 4.4 TOTAL TRAFFIC 14 5.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC OPERATIONS 17 5.1 2022 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC 17 5.2 2022 TOTAL TRAFFIC 18 6.0 SUMMARY 19 APPENDIX M R /1 KIRKHAM W (til MICHAEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS 20 Page i Skyline Estates Filing #3 Traffic Impact Analysis List of Figures FIGURE 1 - VICINITY MAP FIGURE 2 - EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FIGURE 3 - FUTURE LANE CONFIGURATION AND TRAFFIC CONTROL. FIGURE 4 - SITE TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT AND DISTRIBUTION FIGURE 5 - BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES FIGURE 6 -TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES List of Tables TABLE 1 - SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LOS CRITERIA TABLE 2 - UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LOS CRITERIA TABLE 3 - YEAR 2002 EXISTING TRAFFIC LOS ANALYSIS TABLE 4 - TRIP GENERATION TABLE 5 - YEAR 2022 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC LOS ANALYSIS TABLE 6 - YEAR 2022 TOTAL TRAFFIC LOS ANALYSIS Appendix Signalized LOS Description Unsignalized LOS Description RTD Bus Route Information Site Plan NRC Access Code Auxiliary Lane Requirements Skyline Estates Filing #1 Site Traffic Reassignment Skyline Estates Filing #2 Site Traffic Assignment Existing Traffic Count Data 2001 Existing Traffic Level of Service Sheets 2022 Background Traffic Level of Service Sheets 2022 Total Traffic Level of Service Sheets 2 5 10 13 15 ..........16 .6 .6 .7 11 17 18 M ~ KIRKHAM W MICHAEL Page ii Skyline Estates Filing #3 Traffic Impact Analysis 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Executive Summary Development of Skyline Estates Filing #3 with a mix of residential and commercial land uses in not anticipated to create capacity related deficiencies in the study area. Each study intersection is anticipated to operate at LOS A with the development of this project. 1.2 Purpose The purpose of this study is to estimate the trip generation potential for the proposed Skyline Estates Filing #3 for the design year of 2022, and evaluate the impact of background and site generated traffic on the surrounding transportation system. To analyze the impact to adjacent roadways in the study area, existing capacity and total traffic levels of service were evaluated for each design year. 1.3 Project Location Skyline Estates Filing #3 is a proposed master planned development and is a part of the larger Skyline Estates development. The site is bordered by Ridge Road on the south, 54th Avenue on the north, Skyline Estates Filing #2 to the west and vacant undeveloped land to the east. The site is planned to be developed with 37 single family dwelling units and 18,900 S.F. of commercial development. The site is currently zoned A-1 (Agricultural One) per City of Wheat Ridge zoning standards. The location of the proposed site with the existing roadway network is shown in Figure 1. 1.4 Study Area The area of significant impact was determined to include Ridge Road and 54th Avenue adjacent to the project site. The future site access intersection onto Ridge Road and 54th Avenue was also included in the analysis. M KIRKHAM Page I vu~j MICHAEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS N 1"=1800' MM FIGURE 1 WM MICCHAE VICINITY CONSULTING ENGINEERS MAP KM Project No. M-020312 Skyline Estates Filing #3 Traffic Impact Analysis Page 2 Skyline Estates Filing #3 Traffic Impact Analysis 2.0 Existing Conditions 2.1 Existing Roadway System The existing local roadway system in the study area is made up of mostly collector roadways serving commuter traffic and small residential developments. The majority of roadways in the study area are north/south collector or local roadways with no regional significance. A description of the major area roadways follows and lane geometry's for study roadways and intersections are shown in Figure 2. Ridge Road is a two lane east/west roadway within the limits of the project. Ridge Road begins at Tabor Street, is grade separated at Kipling Street and terminates at Independence Street. The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad (BNSF) parallels Ridge Road throughout the study area. There are no curb, gutter or sidewalks along Ridge Road in the project area. The posted speed limit on Ridge Road is 35 mph. Parfet Street is a two lane north/south local roadway within the project area. Parfet Street exists from the 1-70 Frontage Road on the south to Ridge Road on the north. At the intersection with Ridge Road, Parfet Street is stop controlled and provides no exclusive turn lanes. No curb, gutter or sidewalks are provided on Parfet Street in the vicinity of the project site. The speed limit on Parfet Street is 30 mph. M l1 l1 KIRKHAM W fvl MICHAEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS Page 3 Skyline Estates Filing #3 Traffic Impact Analysis 22 Pedestrian and Transit Facilities Local and express bus routes serve the immediate area surrounding the project site. The nearest bus service is Local Route 100 which traverses along Ridge Road and provides service to Kipling Street. The nearest stop is located at the Ridge Road/Miller Road intersection just east of the project site. The nearest express route is the 58x and the 72x. Both routes provide service into the downtown Denver area. The nearest stop is at the 58th Avenue/Kipling Street intersection. Sidewalks are not provided on Ridge Road or Parfet Street adjacent to the project site. No other pedestrian facilities currently exist within the study area. 2.3 Traffic Volumes Peak hour turning movement and 24-hour daily traffic counts were conducted on May 29, 2001 for this project. The intersection of Ridge Road and Parfet Street was surveyed during the morning and evening peak hours of 7:00-9:00 a.m. and 4:00-6:00 p.m., respectively. Daily traffic counts were also taken on Ridge Road in the study area. The existing traffic volumes and traffic control are shown graphically in Figure 3. A complete list of the count data can be found in the Appendix. M M KIRKHAM Page 4 W MICHAEL N A( ~ N.T.S. PROJECT SITE I- V) I LEGEND: LL 0 = STOP SIGN a = TRAFFIC LANE GROUP TYPE = POSTED SPEED LIMIT MPH FIGURE 2 MICHAEL EXISTING TRAFFIC CONSULTING ENGINEERS CONDITIONS KM Project No. M-020312 Skyline Estates Filing #3 Traffic Impact Analysis Page 5 Skyline Estates Filing #3 Traffic Impact Analysis 2.4 Traffic Operations Analysis The traffic operations along the existing study roadways were conducted to evaluate the existing capacity and delays that are currently being experienced. Intersection capacities have been analyzed in accordance with the requirements of the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2000), using the `operations' methodology. The result of such an analysis is a movement level of service (LOS), which is a qualitative assessment of the traffic flow characteristics described by a letter designation ranging from A to F. LOS A represents essentially uninterrupted flow with minimal delay, while LOS F represents breakdown of traffic flow with excessive congestion and delay. LOS D is generally regarded as the desirable minimum performance level. A description of the various levels of service is contained in the Appendix. Chapter 16 of the HCM was used to determine the level of service at the signalized intersections in the study area. The level of service for a signalized intersection is determined by the amount of control delay to vehicles entering/exiting the intersection. Control delay is defined as delay attributed to the traffic control at the intersection. LOS criteria for signalized intersections are shown in Table 1. The Synchro 5.0 signal optimization software was used to analyze the study intersections. Table 1 - Signalized Intersection LOS Criteria The capacity analysis procedures outlined in Chapter 17 of the HCM were used to determine the level of service at the unsignalized intersections. The level of service for a stop controlled intersection is determined by the computed or measured control delay, and is defined for each impeded movement. Level of service is not defined for the intersection as a whole. LOS criteria for unsignalized intersections are shown in Table 2. Table 2 - Unsignalized Intersection LOS Criteria [2 M KIRKHAM vv,j MICHAEL Page 6 Source: 2000 HCM, Table 16-2 Source: 2000 HCM, Table 17-2 Skyline Estates Filing #3 Traffic Impact Analysis 2.5 Existing Traffic LOS Analysis The existing traffic capacity analysis shows that the Parfet Street/Ridge Road intersection operates with acceptable overall LOS during the peak hours of operation. A summary of the existing traffic LOS is shown below in Table 3. Table 3 - Year 2002 Existing Traffic LOS Analysis Parfet Street/ AM Peak A A A A A Ridge Road PM Peak B B A A A M l1 l1 KIRKHAM W fMl MICHAEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS Page 7 Skyline Estates Filing #3 Traffic Impact Analysis 3.0 Proposed Land Use and Roadway Network 3.1 Proposed Land Uses Skyline Estates Filing #3 is comprised of 15.5 acres on the northern side of Ridge Road in Wheat Ridge, Colorado. The site is bordered by Ridge Road on the south, 54th Avenue on the north, Skyline Estates Filing #2 to the west and vacant undeveloped land to the east. The property is planned to be developed with 37 single family homes and 18,900 square feet of commercial area. Buildout of the site will be staggered throughout the years and will ultimately depend on market conditions. A copy of the site plan is contained in the Appendix. 3.2 Future Transportation Network As Skyline Estates Filing #3 and other regional lands develop, the existing roadway system will have to be improved and new roadways constructed to adequately handle the traffic volumes generated by the resultant development. The proposed Skyline Estates development will impact several major roadways within the project area, including Ridge Road. The Ridge Home Property Urban Renewal Plan (completed by RNL Design) was used as the basis for future roadway improvements. Ridge Road is classified as a 2-lane collector according to the Urban Renewal Plan. Currently, Ridge Road is a 2-lane roadway with no curb, gutter or sidewalks. According to the Urban Renewal Plan, the ultimate Ridge Road cross section will consist of 36 feet of pavement from flowline to flowline with curb and gutter. The Urban Renewal Plan also discusses the feasibility of extending Ridge Road to Ward Road. The plan states that the connection will provide a direct access to the west for the Ridge Home property. It was determined that a joint effort between the Town of Arvada and the City of Wheat Ridge would be needed to resolve the future alignment. In this study it was assumed that Ridge Road would terminate at Tabor Street. Parfet Street is classified as a 2-lane collector north of Ridge Road to 58th Avenue. A residential collector provides 36 feet of pavement from flowline to flowline and also has curb, gutter and sidewalks. [2 M KIRKHAM Page 8 vwQ MICHAEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS Skyline Estates Filing #3 Traffic Impact Analysis 3.3 Site Access Skyline Estates Filling #3 is anticipated to have one full movement direct access point onto Ridge Road, two access points to the adjacent filings of Skyline Estates to the west and north. The Ridge Road access is located approximately 350 feet west of the Skyline Estates Filing #2 access. The need for auxiliary lanes at the Ridge Road access point was evaluated based on the State of Colorado State Highway Access Code requirements for an NR-C (Non-Rural Arterial) road. The requirements state that a left turn deceleration lane shall be installed if turning volumes exceed 25vph, and a right tam deceleration lane shall be installed for volumes in excess of 50 vph Based on these requirements it is anticipated that the Site Access onto Ridge Road will not require left or right turn auxiliary turn lanes. The total traffic volumes contained in Section 4.0, illustrates that the volume thresholds are not met. The capacity analysis also shows that the access operates at LOS A without the addition of auxiliary turn lanes. A copy of the NR-C requirements are contained in the Appendix. Sight triangles are also recommended to be provided and maintained at each site access location. The sight triangles are to be based on a driver eye height of 3.5 feet to a 3.5 foot height of object per the 2001 AASHTO Green Book. The recommended lane geometry for the study area roadways and intersections is shown in Figure 3. M l\ /1 KIRKHAM W vvQ MICHAEL Page 9 N N.T.S. 54TH AVENUE 4 w z O N J W z 53RD AVENUE N O Y ~ O PD 1 R\OD-: RO O LEGEND: ® = STOP SIGN = TRAFFIC LANE GROUP TYPE FIGURE 3 [2 ~ MICHAEL FUTURE YEAR LANE CONFIGURATION CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL KM Project No. M-020312 Skyline Estates Filing #3 Traffic Impact Analysis Page 10 Skyline Estates Filing #3 Traffic Impact Analysis 4.0 Future Traffic Projections 4.1 Site Traffic The amount of traffic to be generated by Skyline Estates Filing #3 has been determined using trip generation rates published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) in its report, "Trip Generation", 6a' Edition, 1997. The trip generation for the site is shown below in Table 4. Table 4 - Trip Generation Commercial (ITE 820) 18,900 S.F. 2335 59 36 Single Family Homes (ITE 210) 37 D.U. 415 35 9 TRIP GENERATION - RATE CALCULATIONS Total Trips Commercial (ITE 820) Single Family Homes (ITE 210) AM Peak Hour Traffic Commercial (ITE 820) Single Family Homes (ITE 210) PM Peak Hour Traffic Commercial (ITE 820) Single Family Homes (ITE 210) T = Vehicle Trips X = Gross Floor Area per 1,000 S.F. Ln( ) = Natural Log Ln(T)= 0.643*Ln(X)+5.866 Ln(T)= 0.920*Ln(# D.U.)+2.707 23 209 100 109 26 44 28 16 Ln(T)= 0.596*Ln(X)+2.329 ; (61 %in/39%out) T= 0.700 * # D.U. +9.477 ; (25%in/75%out) Ln(T)= 0.660*Ln(X)+3.403 ; (48%in/52%out) Ln(T)= 0.901*Ln(X)+0.527 ; (64%in/36%out) In order to remain conservative, internal reduction or pass-by trip reduction factors were not applied to the trip generation estimates. [2 M KIRKHAM vjQ MICHAEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS Page 11 Skyline Estates Filing #3 Traffic Impact Analysis 4.2 Project Generated Trip Directional Distribution and Assignment The distribution and assignment of site traffic onto the surrounding transportation network depend on several different factors including: • The distribution of existing traffic volume counts. • The types of land use to be constructed and the types of uses that surround the site. • The transportation network adjacent to the site. • The proposed access to the transportation network. Skyline Estates Filing #3 is located along the north border of the City of Wheat Ridge, approximately 12 miles northwest of the Denver metropolitan area. Other nearby population centers include Arvada, Commerce City and Lakewood. Each of these locations provide ideal destinations for vehicles exiting the site. Several roadways will serve the project site. These include Ridge Road immediately adjacent to the project site, as well as Kipling Street and 48`h Avenue. These roadways will provide access to nearby centers of employment and to inter-regional transportation corridors including Interstate 70. The site is planned to gain access to Ridge Road as well as having alternative access to adjacent filings of the Skyline Estates community. The existing traffic counts taken along Ridge Road show a general balance between eastbound and westbound traffic. It is anticipated that the generated site traffic will follow a similar pattern. After analyzing each of these factors specific distribution percentages were made for each design year. The percentages are descriptive of the overall traffic throughout the day. The external traffic was then assigned to the study roadways using the distribution percentages for both the AM and PM peak hours. Figures 4 shows the site distribution and assignment for year 2022. KIRKHAM vuQ MICHAEL Page 12 N N.T.S. 54TH AVENUE 35% 25% 32 12 17 31 ~ W IY IL- (n Z O W J W Z 53RD AVENUE (connection to Filing #2) w 1 9 _7 25 19 15% Y 3 Y O 2 2 4 R~P~ 5 o R~~GE z5 2 4 2 5 LEGEND: 0 4 75 = AAA PEAK HER OUP TR~~ PERCENT DISTRI1311710N MM KIRKHAM FIGURE 4 MICHAEL SITE TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND DISTRIBUTION KM Project No. M-020312 Skyline Estates Filing #3 Traffic Impact Analysis Page 13 Skyline Estates Filing #3 Traffic Impact Analysis 4.3 Background Traffic In order to evaluate the impacts of the proposed development for future years the existing background traffic volumes on the roadway system must be projected for those years. The Ridge Home Property Urban Renewal Plan was used as a basis for forecasting volumes to year 2022. Based on projected daily traffic volumes on the study roadways shown in the Urban Renewal Plan, existing volumes along Ridge Road were projected to year 2022 using a 2% compound growth rate. Future volumes on 54`h Avenue were derived from the original Ridge View Subdivision Traffic Study completed by Kirkham Michael. The original traffic study included traffic volume forecasts for Skyline Estates Filing #1, Red Rocks Community College and several other planned developments in the area. Site traffic generated by these land uses was assigned to the roadway network assumed in the report. Since the submittal of the original traffic study, several land use and roadway alignment changes have been made to the Ridge View site. To account for the changes, site traffic from the Ridge View housing development and surrounding land uses was modified and assigned to the roadway network for Skyline Estates Filing #1. A copy of the assumptions made on for the adjustment of Ridge View site traffic are contained in the Appendix. The 2022 background traffic volumes are shown in Figure 5. 4.4 Total Traffic Site generated traffic volumes were added to the existing and projected background traffic volumes for the AM and PM peak hours to arrive at total traffic volumes. Figure 6 illustrates year 2022 total traffic volumes. M M KIRKHAM W vvQ MICHAEL Page 14 N N.T.S. L w w Y Q O 12 9 17 JI6 13 L i 3 3 --140-1 54TH AVENUE 28 ,e s 1 ; o 3 1 1 1 1 1 W 1 ~ 1 N 1z 1 0 IJ Iw z 1 53RD AVENUE 1 1 1 1 0 + 203 J 1 r e R~pGE 0 37~` sir 3 9 LEGEND: W I = N PEAKMR8 [2M KMKICH HAE CONSULTING ENGINEERS FIGURE 5 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES KM Project No. M-020312 Skyline Estates Filing #3 Traffic Impact Analysis Page 15 N N.T.S. J L - ,e 54TH AVENUE qtr 2 16, ,4 , -17 Ld W G7 Z O to J W Z 53RD AVENUE w 9 ,3 y r 23 y8 N _J Zp3 O ^ 8 R 1 17 yti ,0 2p R\D~`l~ OPD 13 r4 t 24 9 50 15 ,4 2 LLEGGEND: ~~AFFfCRKH" FIGURE 6 KI MICHAEL TOTAL TRAFFIC CONSULTING ENGINEERS VOLUMES KM Project No. M-020312 Skyline Estates Filing #3 Traffic Impact Analysis Page 16 Skyline Estates Filing #3 Traffic Impact Analysis 5.0 Future Traffic Operations 5.1 2022 Background Traffic An analysis of the 2022 background traffic showed that each study intersection operates with acceptable overall and individual movement delay during both peak hours of operation. All study intersections operate at LOS A during the AM the PM peak hours. A summary of the capacity analysis is contained in Table 5. Note: In order to evaluate the true impact that Skyline Filing #3 will have on the adjacent transportation network, the background traffic LOS analysis was run assuming the Site Access Road that traverses through the project site exists in year 2022. vv~~ KIRKHAM ((W M MICHAEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS Page 17 Table 5 - Year 2022 Background Traffic LOS Analysis Skyline Estates Filing #3 Traffic Impact Analysis 5.2 2022 Total Traffic An analysis of the 2022 total traffic showed that the addition of Skyline Estates Filing 93 site traffic does not adversely effect operations in the study area. Each study intersection continues to function at LOS A during both the AM and PM peak hours. All individual movements continue to operate at or above LOS B. A summary of the capacity analysis is contained in Table 6. Table 6 - Year 2022 Total Traffic LOS Analysis KIRKHAM M MICHAEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS Page 18 Skyline Estates Filing #3 Traffic Impact Analysis 6.0 Summary Skyline Estates Filing #3 is comprised of 15.5 acres on the northern side of Ridge Road in Wheat Ridge, Colorado. The site is bordered by Ridge Road on the south, 54`h Avenue on the north, Skyline Estates Filing 92 to the west and vacant undeveloped land to the east. The existing traffic capacity analysis shows that the Parfet Street/Ridge Road intersection operates with acceptable overall LOS during the peak hours of operation. Based on the results of the future year capacity analysis, each intersection is summarized below: Ridge Road/Site Access - The capacity analysis shows that the intersection operates at LOS A during both the AM and PM peak hours in year 2022 with the addition of Skyline Estates Filing #3 site traffic. Based on the requirements for an NR-C category roadway, it is not anticipated that auxiliary turn lanes will be warranted at the intersection. 54`h Avenue/Site Access & Ridge Road/Parfet Street - In ultimate buildout design year of 2022, each intersection operates with acceptable delay during both peak hours of operation. Based on the previous traffic impact studies completed for Filings 41 and #2, it is not anticipated that auxiliary turn lanes will be warranted at either of these locations. Volumes along Ridge Road are not expected to exceed 350vph in either the east or westbound directions. The low volume along Ridge Road and 54`h Avenue coupled with good LOS experienced at each intersection justifies that auxiliary lanes not be installed. MM KIRKHAM W ~ MICHAEL Page 19 CONSULTING ENGINEERS Skyline Estates Filing #3 Traffic Impact Analysis APPENDIX KIRKHAM WM MICHAEL Page 20 DEFINITION OF LEVEL OF SERVICE Signalized Intersections Level of service for signalized intersections is defined in terms of delay. Delay is a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and lost travel time. Specifically, level-of- service criteria are stated in terms of the average stopped delay per vehicle for a 15-minute analysis period. Delay is a complex measure, and is dependent on a number of variables. Level of Service A - Describes operations with very low delay, i.e., less than 10.0 sec per vehicle. Progression is extremely favorable, and no approach phase is fully utilized. Most vehicles do not stop at all and no vehicle waits longer than one red indication. Level of Service B - Describes operations with delay in the range of 10.1 to 20.0 sec per vehicle. This generally occurs with good progression. More vehicles stop than for LOS A, causing higher levels of average delay. An occasional phase is fully utilized. Level of Service C - Describes operations with delay in the range of 20.1 to 35.0 sec per vehicle. These higher delays may result from fair progression. The number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level, although many still pass through the intersection without stopping. Occasionally drivers may have to wait through more than one red signal indication. Level of Service D - Describes operations with delay in the range of 35.1 to 55.0 sec per vehicle. At level D, the influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from unfavorable progression. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. Delays may be substantial during short peaks within the peak period. Level of Service E - Describes operations with delay in the range of 55.1 to 80.0 sec per vehicle. This is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. These high delay values generally indicate poor progression. There may be long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection. Delays may be as much as several cycles. Level of Service F - Describes operations with delay in excess of 80.0 sec per vehicle. This is considered to be unacceptable to most drivers. This condition often occurs with over saturation, i.e., when arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the intersection. Volumes are not predictable under these conditions. DEFINITION OF LEVEL OF SERVICE Unsianalized Intersections Unsignalized intersections base the level of service on the amount of delay experienced by vehicles tinning out of or into the minor, stop sign controlled street. There are no agreed upon quantitative measures of levels of service for unsignalized intersections, but some qualitative measures are given below: Level of Service A - Little or no delay to vehicles. A very high level of service usually found only in rural areas or during off-peak hours. Level of Service B - Short delays to vehicles. Still a very good level of service. Level of Service C - Average delays to vehicles. Waiting time becomes noticeable. Freedom to enter major street traffic is slightly restricted. Level of Service D - Long delays to vehicles. Due to heavy volumes on major street, vehicles on minor streets are restricted in their ability to enter traffic stream. Level of Service E - Very long delays to vehicles. Tolerable for short periods of time. If this level of service is present for a long period, the queue build-up on minor street becomes noticeable. Level of Service F - Represents jammed conditions. Back-ups from locations down-stream or on the cross street may restrict or prevent movement of vehicles out of the approach under consideration; hence, volumes carried are not predictable. Wheat Ridge Wheat Ridge 4*3 rz- Click on the number or letter to get the route schedule N w_. E S 10 LEGEND Local skyRide Limited Light Rail Routes Express Non-RTD operated Routes Regional f=ree Mail Shuttle O MacVan The Map Company Selected Trips park-n-Ride Light Rail Stations Pagel 1* 10, ittp://www.rtd-denver.com/SystemMaps/sysmap26_WheatRidge.htm 5:58:17 PM 09/03/02 Arvada Arvada K> Pagel "WRONEMNMW Click on the number or letter to get the route schedule N Ah~ w E 3 0 LEGEND Local skyRide Selected Trips Limited r Light Rail Routes park-n-Ride Express Non-RTD operated Routes Light Rail Regional Free Mall Shuttle ® Stations 6 MacVan The Map Company I ittp://www.rtd-denver.com/SystemMaps/sysmap20_Arvada.htm 5:58:26 PM 09/03/02 H I LI w ~ N L, 1=300' a a _ II II II II II I II II II II 54TH AVENUE-- - - ' - - _ - r-------~ r---~1 r---Ir----1 r--I 1' %r---i r 54TH AVENUE 'L , I 1 I 11 I ___J L___ J L__ J f "1 -l r -l r---l r -1 r -M r 7, 1 , 11 I , I r~~1 V J L---- J L___J L___J L___J L___J L___J L_J L___J L--- J L--'J II r -,I r L _l L 1 rI r-- _7j ,I 1I 1, LJ J L___J L___J I IL ---J r____i rL___J I I I I I r L J LJ , I J 1. II I, ire-,.~ r l L- I L---- J f ~ III I L__J \ Ld L a - N I W ~{~Q Ld To Li 1, u- R ~ N a / z D- / o J W z [2 Ml MICHAEL SITE CONSULTING ENGINEERS PLAN KM Project No. M-020312 Skyline Estates Filing #3 Traffic Impact Analysis (c) The issuing authority or Department may require an auxiliary lane when it is specifically identified and documented that the lane is necessary to prevent or correct an operational or safety condition or as determined by subsection 3.5. (d) An acceleration lane is generally not required except as may be determined by subsection 3.5. (5) When an existing access meets the warrants for a traffic signal as defined in the M.U.T.C.D., and the location does not meet the requirements of this subsection, the access may be reconstructed to eliminate or reduce the traffic movements that cause the traffic signal warrant to be met, and the access brought into conformance with the criteria of this subsection. A raised median may be required. Closure may be required if alternative reasonable access is available. 3.12 CATEGORY NR-C - Non-Rural Arterial Functional Characteristics and Category Assignment Criteria (1) This category is appropriate for use on non-rural highways that have the capacity for low to moderate travel speeds and relatively moderate volumes over medium and short travel distances providing for intercity, intracity and intercommunity travel needs. These routes are not of regional, state or national significance. This category is typically assigned where there is extensive established roadside development and street systems such as a 'downtown' area, making the assignment of a higher category unrealistic. This category provides a reasonable balance between direct access and mobility needs. Access Granting Criteria including Category Related Access Location, Operation and Design Standards (2) When application is made, one access shall-be granted to each parcel if it does not create a significant safety problem or significantly degrade operation. The access may operate as a full- movement unsignalized access unless there is an established non-traversable median, or a safety or traffic operation problem is identified. (3) Additional access shall be granted if the additional access would not knowingly cause a hardship to an adjacent property or interfere with the location, planning, and operation of the general street system, and would be in compliance with Code design standards, and the applicant establishes that an additional access is necessary for the safe and efficient use of the property. Where the property abuts or has primary access to a lesser function road or an internal street system or by way of dedicated rights-of-way or easements, any access to the state highway shall be considered as an additional access. Auxiliary Lane Requirements (4) Auxiliary turn lanes shall be installed according to the criteria below. (a) A left turn lane with storage length plus taper length is required for any access with a projected peak hour left ingress turning volume greater than 25 vph. If the posted speed is greater than 40 mph, a deceleration lane and taper is required for any access with a projected peak hour left ingress turning volume greater than 10 vph. The taper length will be included within the deceleration length. (b) A right turn lane with storage length plus taper length is required for any access with a projected peak hour right ingress turning volume greater than 50 vph. If the posted speed is greater State Highway Access Code, August 31, 1998 Page 44 of 62 than 40 mph, a right turn deceleration lane and taper is required for any access with a projected peak hour right ingress turning volume greater than 25 vph. The taper length will be included within the deceleration length. (c) The issuing authority or Department may require an auxiliary lane when it is specifically identified and documented that the lane is necessary to prevent or correct an operational or safety condition, or as determined by section 3.5. (5) For residential property, if the property abuts or has primary access to- a lower classification street or road by way of an internal street or road system or dedicated rights-of-way or easements, any driveway to the state highway shall be considered as an additional access. (6) When a proposed access would meet the warrants for a traffic signal as defined in the M.U.T.C.D., and the location does not meet the requirements of this subsection, the access may be reconstructed to eliminate or reduce the traffic movements that cause the traffic signal warrant to be met, and the access brought into conformance with the criteria of this subsection. A raised median may be required. (7) Minimum spacing between traffic signals shall be that which is necessary for the safe operation, capacity, and proper design of the signal and adjacent accesses. The location shall be consistent with current signal progression efficiency and cause no degradation. Preference in traffic signal location, timing and operation shall be given to highways and cross streets of a higher access category or function. No traffic signal shall be authorized without the completion of an analysis of traffic signal system operation, design, and safety as well as meeting M.U.T.C.D. signal warrants. 3.13 CATEGORY F-R - Frontage Road Functional Characteristics and Category Assignment Criteria (1) Category F-R shall be assigned only to roadways that are designated as frontage or service roads where there is no intended purpose of providing for long distance traffic movements. Category F-R may be assigned for high speed rural frontage roads. Access needs will take priority over through traffic movements without compromising the public health, welfare, or safety. Providing reasonable and safe access to abutting property is the primary purpose of this access category. At the request of the local authority, the Commission may in accordance with subsection 2.2, assign any frontage or service road to a higher access category when desirable to meet local transportation plans and needs. Access Granting Criteria including Category Related Access Location, Operation and Design Standards (2) When application is made, one access shall be granted to each parcel if it does not create a significant safety problem or significantly degrade operation. The access may operate as a full- movement unsignalized access unless there is an established restrictive median, or a safety or operations problem is identified. The location shall also be consistent with current signal progression efficiency and cause no degradation (3) Additional access will be granted if the additional access would not knowingly cause a hardship to an adjacent property or interfere with the location, planning, and operation of the general street system, State Highway Access Code, August 31, 1998 Page 45 of 62 Gam} fv111/J KIRKHAM W fi~fl MICHAEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS 56DOSouNQuebec Str t•Swte] D•Gre ooCViuage,C BMII Job number: Sheet of Project: Sk i vl/ne FZ,Z, # 3 Date: Subject: ~Pr 55i4yraYlrn~ d lCiliq EA f ie- Designed: 4 Checked: - 2S,deY ljd porcels norfA+ West b/ -lk Side Ivere J°`~G S re~s°Cl reed on the new eo~neekv~) 40 Rid e Rope/ /-I 9enere,Ai ,7 #'s were bos&e/oi of Pa4&eel /4/Z easgune)<s)a Vlofe- 1W voAme,5 do not Ailanee the, dotal T--Gen esFmedes, due /0 016e-f- s~menfs nv>` shvwir vn flits sG,eed: 1 N (43 r -L r M Li) a \J7 i +a s its) y y ra A✓~u~ (5)q - f Z (3) 5 ao~ v z v ~~--set 9) gel & Woo d Uu)j~ 'a 64r ~•/ia~ d o/a1 7- -,1 d1n 1k18 pf 1/a 91 20% N N.T.S. 3 11 5% t ~ ze 54TH AVENUE 1 35% I ' ~ III I ,O 1 I i i i i of I a I I I I j I j I 15% i R j ~~GV RGPO s I < 5 s ~s l 6 2 I e 10% LEGEND: 1 5% = AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC - TRAFFICO VOLUME (vpd~OUR HOUR DIRE zX = PERCENT DISTRIBUTION FIGURE 5 LAN MIQ CI~i SITE TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND DISTRIBUTION i KM Project No. M-010414 Skyline Estates Filing #2 TIS T el T...e2 Title3 lz._.rval Begin !:AM 01:00 )2:00 j D3:00 04:00 05:00 96:00 07:00 08:00 99:00 10:00 11:00 2:PM )1:00 02:00 93:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 W.L. Contractors 6435 W. 55th Ave. Arvada, CO 80002 RIDGE E OF PARFET Site: 1 Date: 05/29/01 Day: Tuesday WB 3 5 16 9 6 22 64 131 85 75 71 91 104 102 119 103 100 101 84 51 29 16 11 3 Totals 1,401 A [Peak 07:00 Volume 131 P Peak 02:00 Volume 119 * DataFile : KM RIDGE #1 Printed : 05/30/2001 Page : 1 W.L. Contractors 6435 W. 55th Ave. Arvada, CO 80002 ritle l fitle2 Title3 Interval Begin 12:AM 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:PM 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 Total RIDGE E OF PARFET EB Site: I Date: 05/29/01 AM Pea Volume l PM Pea Volume 3 6 2 18 8 22 51 93 88 86 78 107 137 102 107 153 144 194 125 81 53 18 8 8 1,692 11:00 107 05:00 194 Tuesday i " Data File : KM RIDGE 9 1 Printed : 05/30/2001 Page : 1 W.L. Contractors 6435 W. 55th Ave. Arvada, CO 80002 303-422-7985 (:rnunc Printerl. (7,mun 1 File Name : RIDGE&PARFETAM Site Code : 99923634 Start Date : 05/29/2001 Page No : 1 PARFET RIDGE PARFET RIDGE Southbound Westbound N orthbound Eastbound Start Time Ri ht Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Int. Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 19 5 6 0 3 4 14 0 51 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 22 6 2 0 3 1 23 0 57 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 25 4 4 0 2 2 16 0 53 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 34 6 1 0 1 7 30 0 79 Total 0 0 0 0 100 21 13 0 9 14 83 0 240 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 28 4 3 0 4 5 26 0 70 08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 20 6 5 0 2 2 15 0 50 08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 10 8 1 0 5 6 21 0 51 08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 12 2 6 0 4 4 11 0 39 Total 0 0 0 0 70 20 15 0 15 17 73 0 210 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 170 41 28 0 24 31 156 0 450 Apprch % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 80.6 19.4 53.8 0.0 46.2 16.6 83.4 0.0 Total % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.8 9.1 6.2 0.0 5.3 6.9 34.7 0.0 PARFET Out In Total C-pj 0 0 0 0 Ri ht Thru Left North w m m~ y 5/2912007 70000 AM o H-2 J 5129/20018 45 00 AM g °m - tO 'v5~~ Group 1 ~s p ~y pl ¢ 1 a LJ N - Left Thru Ri ht 24 0 28 72 52 724 Out In Total ARFET W.L. Contractors 6435 W. 55th Ave. Arvada, CO 80002 303-422-7985 File Name : RIDGE&PARFETAM Site Code : 99923634 Start Date : 05/29/2001 Page No :2 PARFET Southbound RIDGE Westbound PARFET Northbound RIDGE Eastbound [ tart Time S Rlgh Thru Left App. Righ Thru Left App. Righ Thru Left App. Righ Thru Left App' Int. t Total t Total t Total t Total Total _ Peak Hour From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersectio 07:15 AM n Volume 0 0 0 0 0 109 20 129 10 0 10 20 15 95 0 110 259 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 84.5 15.5 50.0 0.0 50.0 13.6 86.4 0.0 07:45 0 0 0 0 0 34 6 40 1 0 1 2 7 30 0 37 79 Volume Peak 0.820 Factor High Int. 6:45:00 AM 07:45 AM 08:00 AM 07:45 AM Volume 0 0 0 0 0 . 34 6 40 3 0 4 7 7 30 0 37 Peak 0.806 0.714 0.743 Factor PARFET Out In Total E0 0 0 _ 0 '7 t Thru LL/ NN r ~O w N ~ - o ~ T Notch =o o M C N _ c--t 5/29/2001 715:00 AM ~2 o N o ~ 5/2912001 8:00:00 AM m N m m -l Group 1 O` ° um a- ' T ' Left Thru Ri h[ 10 0 70 35 20 55 Out In Total PARFET W.L. Contractors 6435 W. 55th Ave. Arvada, CO 80002 303-422-7985 (;,nine Printer/. I InShifferl File Name : RIDGE&PARFETPM Site Code : 99923634 Start Date : 05/29/2001 Page No : 1 PARFET RIDGE PARFET RIDGE Southbound Westbound N orthbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Ri ht Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Int. Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 27 1 7 0 3 4 32 0 74 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 25 3 3 0 5 2 24 0 62 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 14 1 7 0 4 2 35 0 63 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 34 1 4 0 2 4 42 0 87 Total 0 0 0 0 100 - 6 21 0 14 12 133 0 286 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 36 2 5 0 6 2 55 0 106 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 29 1 8 0 3 3 46 0 90 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 24 2 6 0 5 5 38 0 80 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 11 3 2 0 4 6 41 0 67 Total 0 0 0 0 100 8 21 0 18. 16 180 0 343 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 200 14 42 0 32 28 313 0 629 Apprch % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 93.5 6.5 56.8 0.0 43.2 8.2 91.8 0.0 Total % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.8 2.2 6.7 0.0 5.1 4.5 49.8 0.0 PARFET Out In Total F 01 9 0 ol Right Thru Left M o ~ o T _A ~o mJ North t° =o W nJ y A ~512:;2100 01 4: 00:00 PM~ ~2 'O 5/2201 5:45:00 PM O Unshietl ~s o a 1D - Lek Thru Ri ht 32 0 42 ELM 74 116 Out In Total PARFET W.L. Contractors 6435 W. 55th Ave. Arvada, CO 80002 303-422-7985 File Name : RIDGE&PARFETPM Site Code : 99923634 Start Date : 05/29/2001 Page No :2 PARFET RIDGE PARFET RIDGE Sou thbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound rt Time FSt~t I Rlg[ Thru Left Rlg Thru Left T t l Rlgt I Thru Left ToApp tal Rlgt Thru Left App. Total Total t o a Peak Hour From U4:UU I M to 05:45 YIVI - Peal( 1 or 1 Intersectio 04:45 PM n Volume 0 0 0 0 0 123 6 129 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 95.3 4.7 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 36 2 38 Volume Peak Factor High Int. 3:45:00 PM 05:00 PM Volume 0 0 0 0 0 36 2 38 Peak 0.849 Factor 23 0 16 39 59.0 0.0 41.0 5 0 6 11 05:00 PM 5 0 6 11 0.886 14 181 0 195 7.2 92.8 0.0 2 55 0 57 05:00 PM 2 55 0 57 0.855 PARFET Out In 0 TO l RI?ht Thru Left , °n ❑ f °Y T T w^ 9 North ~a ~n p Q _ C ~ - ^ m c 5/29/2001 4:45:00 PM 2 ❑ F ~ ° i3 N 5/29/2001 5:30:00 PM M _ r T ~ Unshiftetl u- 4~ T -4 _ Left Thru Ri ht 16 0 23 20 39 59 Out In Total PARFET Int. Total 363 106 0.856 3: Ridge Road & Parfet Street Year 2001 Existing Traffic AM Peak Page 1 Synchro 5 Report H:\020312\traMxistingAm.sy6 kirkhagre5-ff51 Pedestrians Volume Total 120 140 22 3: Ridge Road & Parfet Street Year 2001 Existing Traffic PM Peak 0% 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Page 1 Synchro 5 Report H:\020312\trat\Existing Pm.sy6 kirkhagre5-ff51 \/nli imc Tntal . 212 140 42 1: Ridge Road & Site Access Year 2022 Background Traffic AM Peak Page 1 Synchro 5 Report H:\020312\traNbackam.sy6 kirkhagre5-ff51 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 M Vnlume Total 197 224 7 Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 Volume Total 353 252 4 Page 1 Synchro 5 Report H:\020312\traflbackpm.sy6 kirkhagre5-ff51 I: 1: Ridge Road & Site Access Year 2022 Background Traffic ` PM Peak 2: Ridge Road & Parfet Street Year 2022 Background Traffic AM Peak Lane Configurations 41> s 4+ 4+ Gn It rxe s. z s.52.z~y~ s T ^ ~ hG,`^c~'"-n W-,rt A N K h 4,, y,r~u._...F4. ,xa N ,P' s n....d,. nod no/ 0% 0% Hour 0.92 0.92 3.5 cM 1386 870 0.92 3.5 4.0 Page 2 Synchro 5 Report H:\020312\trat\backam. sy6 kirkhagre5-ff51 tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6. Volume Total 190 221 36 40 aw W-Ow WIN 2: Ridge Road & Parfet Street Year 2022 Background Traffic PM Peak Page 2 Synchro 5 Report H:\020312\traflbackpm.sy6 kirkhagre5-Ml Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 92 0.92 0.92 Volume Total 338 242 75 28 3: 54th Avenue & Site Access Year 2022 Background Traffic 4 AM Peak Page 3 Synchro 5 Report H:\020312\traflbackam.sy6 kirkhagre5-ff51 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 \/nlnmc Tntni :A5 12 3 5 3: 54th Avenue & Site Access Year 2022 Background Traffic PM Peak 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Page 3 kirkhagre5451 Synchro 5 Report H:\020312\traf\backpm.sy6 Volume Total 22 48 10 3 1: Ridge Road & Site Access Year 2022 Total Traffic AM Peak Lane 0% Factor 0.92 Page 1 Synchro 5 Report H:\020312\trafltotal am.sy6 kirkhagre5-ff51 TM.1 9ns 932 24 1: Ridge Road & Site Access Year 2022 Total Traffic PM Peak 0.92 Page 1 Synchro 5 Report H:\020312\trat\totalpm.sy6 kirkhagre5-ff51 --tj. 4" ti Volume Total 380 273 52 2: Ridge Road & Parfet Street Year 2022 Total Traffic AM Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Volume Total 195 230 43 45 Intersection Capacity Utilization 36.1% ICU Level of Service A Page 2 Synchro 5 Report H:\020312\trafltotalam.sy6 kirkhagre5-ff51 2: Ridge Road & Parfet Street Year 2022 Total Traffic PM Peak * /111- 4/ Page 2 Synchro 5 Report H A020312\trafltotalpm.sy6 kirkhagre5-ff51 ~U Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 Volume Total . 352 270 96 35 3: 54th Avenue & Site Access Year 2022 Total Traffic * AM Peak 0.92 0 92 022 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Page 3 Synchro 5 Report H:\020312\traf\totalam.sy6 kirkhagre5451 Vnl, imm Tntai . 47 29 35 5 3: 54th Avenue & Site Access Year 2022 Total Traffic PM Peak % t j* ♦ Lane 0% Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 Page 3 Synchro 5 Report H:\020312\trafltotalpm.sy6 kirkhagre5-ff51 I C> TM.1 57 97 91 3 KIRKHAM MICHAEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS March 31, 2003 Ms. Mary Austin City of Wheat Ridge 7500 West 29`h Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 RE: Technical Review Comments of 2-12-03 Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 (First Submittal) Dear Ms. Austin: Omaha • Des Moines • Denver Phoenix • Ellsworth & Louisburg. KS www.kirkham.com The following is a point-by point response to the Technical Review Comments dated February 12, 2003 pertaining to Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 (First Submittal). Please review these for processing towards approvals from the City of Wheat Ridge. We have enclosed 5 sets of the following as requested by you for this second submittal: 1. Redline Plan Sets from Submittal No. 2. Final Plat 3. Outline Development Plan 4. Final Development Plan 5. Construction Plans • Street Plans • Overlot Grading and Ditch Improvement Plans • Storm Sewer Plans • Irrigation Plans 6. Drainage Report (3 copies) 7. Traffic Impact Study (3 copies) 8. Excel Energy Plan, Design #44912 9. Homeowner's Association Documents 10. Signed Maintenance Agreement (Industrial Portion Separate) 11. Minor Dumping/Landfill Permit 12. Developer's Agreement (Melody Homes will work with the city on the developer's conditions.) 13. Check for the $800 Street Width Delineation fee (Check No. 17101) It is our understanding that you will distribute the plans to the following City departments: 1. Department of Public Works 2. Planning Department 5600 South Quebec Street 0 Suite 200 D • Greenwood Village, CO 80111 • (303) 694-2300 • FAX (303) 694-2822 Ms. Mary Austin March 31, 2003 Page 2 Planning Department General comments: Comment No. 1 ■ No comment response required. Comment No. 2 ■ The street name for Oak Street has been changed to Newcombe Street as requested. Comment No. 3 Please advise Melody Homes when the parkland dedication fee has been determined and assessed. Comment No. 4 • The fencing permit requirement has been noted. Outline Development Plan comments: Comment No. 1 ■ The ODP title has been revised as requested. Comment No. 2 ■ The legal description has been amended as requested. Comments No. 3 through No. 7 • The certification blocks have been updated as requested. Comment No. 8 ■ A case history block has been added as requested. Comment No. 9 • The Development Schedule has been amended as requested. Comment No. 10 An Ownership/Unified Control Statement has been added as requested. Comment No. 11 ■ A table has been added to page 2 that addresses the uses of the tracts as requested. Comment No. 12 ■ The proposed streets have been labeled as requested. Comment No. 13 ■ Tract H is a part of Tract C. Ms. Mary Austin March 31, 2003 Page 3 Comment No. 14 ■ The acreage of the industrial lot has been adjusted to match the plat as requested. Comment No. 15 ■ Appropriate access for the industrial lot will be determined at the time the owners of the industrial lot present a formal FDP application for the industrial lot. The area zoned PH) is required to submit a separate FDP according to FDP Comment No. 14. Comment No. 16 ■ The irrigation easement in block three between lots 9 and 10 has been labeled and included in the table listing all tracts as requested. Comment No. 17 ■ The site drawing has been combined onto a single page as requested. Comment No. 18 ■ The ODP has been revised to show the following as requested: ■ General indication of areas to be landscaped ■ Proposed boundaries • Lot lines, easements, right-of-ways, adjacent zoning, land use, streets, ditches, etc. ■ Existing easements, drainage areas, parks and areas dedicated to public use • Location and extent of major use areas • Vegetation and land use features which may influence development Comment No. 19 ■ A statement declaring that the site is not affected by the 100-year flood plain has been added as requested. Comment No. 20 ■ The ODP clearly delineates the areas of PRD and PID zoning as requested. Comment No. 21 • A development standards table has been added to the ODP as requested. Comment No. 22 • The front setback has been noted to be 20 feet to 25 feet with a minimum stagger of 2 feet between adjacent structures. Ms. Mary Austin March 31, 2003 Page 4 Comment No. 23 ■ The maximum building coverage is limited to 40% as requested. Comment No. 24 ■ A site data table has been added as requested. Comment No. 25 The Requested residential development standards have been included, with the following modifications: ■ Materials to be used on residential structures (added as a section of the plan): Homes in the Skyline 3 community shall be consistent with the elevations included as part of this document. Overall fagade and architecture shall conform to the plans included in this document. ■ Residential structures on corner lots adjacent to open space tracts shall include on the side adjacent to the tract the same enhancements required for structures on corner lots. • Residential structures on corner lots shall have a return of decorative wainscoting treatment of either brick or stone and two windows consistent with the elevations included as part of this document. Overall fagade and architecture shall conform to the plans included in this document. ■ The front setback shall vary from 20 feet to 25 feet and there shall be a minimum stagger of 2 feet between adjacent structures. • No two similar structures shall be constructed with the same elevation on adjacent lots or lots across the street. ■ Porches, Decks, Patios and Balconies if open on at least two sides may encroach into a required front yard setback up to eight feet or into a side or rear yard setback a maximum of one-third the required setback. • Architectural features such as cornices, eave beltways, bay windows, sills or canopies may extend or project into a required setback a maximum of thirty inches. Comment No. 26 • Industrial development standards have been included in the ODP as requested. Comment No. 27 ■ The permitted uses section has been revised as requested. Final Development Plan comments Comment No. 1 0 Pages 5 and 6 have been removed as requested. Ms. Mary Austin March 31, 2003 Page 5 Comment No. 2 • The title of the FDP has been revised as requested. Comment No. 3 ■ A case history box has been added as requested. Comment No. 4 ■ The Case# and Map# lines have been eliminated as requested. Comment No. 5 through No. 8 ■ The certification blocks have been changed as requested. Comment No. 9 • The legal description has been changed as requested. Comment No. 10 ■ The typical section for Ridge Road (to be constructed by others) has been added to page 2 as requested. Comment No. 11 • A note stating that all utility lines within and affecting the boundary of the proposed development will be placed underground has been added as requested. Comment No. 12 • A development standards table has been added as requested. Comment No. 13 ■ The maximum building coverage for residential zoning has been changed to 40% as requested. Comment No. 14 ■ A note specifying that the industrial lot is not a part of this FDP has been added to page 1 of the FDP as requested. Comment No. 15 • The square footage of each lot has been added as requested. Comment No. 16 ■ The streets have been labeled as requested. Ms. Mary Austin March 31, 2003 Page 6 Comment No. 17 ■ The landscaping for Tracts G and I has been changed to sod as requested. Comment No. 18 ■ Tracts A and B have been dedicated to the city. Please see FDP Notes 44 and 45. Comment No. 19 ■ Disturbed areas within the industrial lot will be seeded with native seed as shown on erosion control plans. The owner of the lot will be responsible for maintenance. Comment No. 20 • The location of temporary or interim uses of land or buildings has not been determined at this time. Comment No. 21 and No. 22 • The certification blocks have been updated as requested. Comment No. 23 • An elevations page detailing typical elevations for residential structures has been added to the plan set as requested. Comment No. 24 • Melody Homes does not have control over the postal delivery process and therefore they desire not to make specific representations which may or may not be accommodated by the U.S. Post Office. Comment No. 25 • The tree planting list has been changed to show 42 evergreen trees as requested. Comment No. 26 ■ The certification blocks have been changed as requested. Comment No. 27 ■ Melody Homes has provided additional Right-of-Way for the future construction of Ridge Road, including portions of Right-of-Way not a part of Skyline Filing 3. Details have been provided for the layout and overall design of Ridge Road where it relates to the Skyline Filing 3 property. Complete Ridge Road construction plans have not been included with this submittal. Ms. Mary Austin March 31, 2003 Page 7 Comment No. 28 ■ The Skyline Filing 1 HOA is currently responsible for maintaining Tract C. No additional disturbance of the area is proposed. Comment No. 29 ■ No residential project signage is planned. Comment No. 30 The note regarding streetscape maintenance has been added to the FDP as requested. A copy of the Streetscape Maintenance Agreement for the residential portion has been included with this submittal. The industrial portion should provide a separate agreement. Comment No. 31 A copy of the covenants for the Homeowner's Association has been provided for review. The intent is to include Skyline Estates Filing 3 as a part of the Skyline Estates Filing 1 Master Association. Comment No. 32 • The location of residential street lighting has been provided by Excel Energy for the proposed development. A copy of the design from Excel Energy has been included as a separate item in this submittal. The Excel Energy design has been referenced on the FDP signage and striping sheet. Comment No. 33 • A development schedule has been included on page 1 as requested. Comment No. 34 ■ A signage and striping sheet has been added to the FDP to show any traffic regulation devices as requested. Comment No. 35 • The fence has been revised within the front yard setback as requested. Comment No. 36 The fencing between Skyline Estates Filing 2 and Filing 3 is now shown as wood privacy fencing. Comment No. 37 No two similar structures shall be constructed with the same elevation on adjacent lots or lots across the street. Ms. Mary Austin March 31, 2003 Page 8 Comment No. 38 ■ The architectural elevations have been included in the FDP as requested. The included elevations were also used in Filing 2. These plans are representative of the overall character and structure for the development. Comment No. 39 In order to maintain consistency with Skyline Estates Filing 1 and Filing 2, the site plan has been laid out with attached sidewalks. Comment No. 40 ■ The sidewalks have been clearly dimensioned and distinguished on the site plan as requested. Comment No. 41 ■ A detail of the typical front yard landscaping has been provided as requested. Comment No. 42 ■ The landscape plan legend has been revised as requested. Comment No. 43 ■ All tracts now meet the deciduous tree standards as requested. Comment No. 44 Melody Homes has agreed to convey to the city the necessary tracts for the future Columbine Basin improvements. The developer's agreement includes language requiring Melody Homes' fair contribution toward the future construction of the open channel by Wheat Ridge/Arvada/UDFCD. In the interim, a roadside ditch has been provided to accommodate the current runoff in this area. Until conditions warrant maintenance of the fully constructed drainage way by the city, the adjacent property owner or the HOA shall provide interim maintenance within these tracts and/or easements. The conditions should be detailed in the Subdivision Agreement. Comment No. 45 ■ Melody Homes has provided additional Right-of-Way for the future construction of Ridge Road, including portions of Right-of-Way not a part of Skyline Filing 3. Details have been provided for the layout and overall design of Ridge Road where it relates to the Skyline Filing 3 property. Complete Ridge Road construction plans have not been included with this submittal. Ms. Mary Austin March 31, 2003 Page 9 Plat comments: Comment No. 1 ■ The certification blocks have been updated as requested. Comment No. 2 ■ A case history block has been added as requested. Comment No. 3 • Melody Homes has agreed to convey to the city the necessary tracts for the future Columbine Basin improvements. The developer's agreement includes language requiring Melody Homes' fair contribution toward the future construction of the open channel by Wheat Ridge/Arvada/UDFCD. In the interim, a roadside ditch has been provided to accommodate the current runoff in this area. Until conditions warrant maintenance of the fully constructed drainage way by the city, the adjacent property owner or the HOA shall provide interim maintenance within these tracts and/or easements. The conditions should be detailed in the Subdivision Agreement. • Since the site plan has been designed with attached walks, a note about maintenance of the area between detached walks and the back of curb is not necessary. Comment No. 4 ■ The certification blocks have been updated as requested. Comment No. 5 Notes numbers 6-8 have been replaced as requested. Comment No. 6 ■ Note added as requested. Comment No. 7 • The street label for W. 53rd Avenue has been changed as requested. Comment No. 8 and No. 9 • The spelling has been corrected as requested. Comment No. 10 ■ The unlabeled tract of land between lots 5 and 6 has been labeled as requested. Comment No. 11 ■ The legal description has been corrected as requested. Ms. Mary Austin March 31, 2003 Page 10 Comment No. 12 ■ A data table has been added as requested. Comment No. 13 • The easement for the proposed relocation of the Juchem Ditch has been delineated as requested. Comment No. 14 ■ A check for $800 (Check No. 17101) for the Street Width Delineation fee has been included. Department of Public Works Drainage Study comments: Comment No. 1 • An NPDES permit will be obtained from the State of Colorado Department of Health - Water Quality Control Division. A copy will be submitted to the City of Wheat Ridge prior to grading. Comment No. 2 ■ Melody Homes has provided additional Right-of-Way for the fixture construction of Ridge Road, including portions of Right-of-Way not a part of Skyline Filing 3. Details have been provided for the layout and overall design of Ridge Road where it relates to the Skyline Filing 3 property. Complete Ridge Road construction plans have not been included with this submittal. Comment No. 3 Melody Homes has agreed to convey to the city the necessary tracts for the future Columbine Basin improvements. The developer's agreement includes language requiring Melody Homes' fair contribution toward the future construction of the open channel by Wheat Ridge/Arvada/UDFCD. In the interim, a roadside ditch has been provided to accommodate the current runoff in this area. Until conditions warrant maintenance of the fully constructed drainage way by the city, the adjacent property owner or the HOA shall provide interim maintenance within these tracts and/or easements. The conditions should be detailed in the Subdivision Agreement. Comment No. 4 The inlets on Oak Street (now renamed Newcombe Street) have not been relocated to the sump. The sump shown in the profile view is the pan located at the intersection of Newcombe Street and W. 53rd Avenue. The inlets have been designed as on-grade inlets. Ms. Mary Austin March 31, 2003 Page 11 Comment No. 5 ■ The future design of the industrial site has been considered in the drainage report. It is designed such that the future detention pond will release into the same pipe system as the two ponds for the residential development. The release rate of the future pond has been included in the design of the outlet pipe system. Comment No. 6 ■ The drainage pond and open channel along the eastern portion of the site are owned and maintained by the Skyline Estates Filing 1 Homeowner's Association. The existing ditch will not be disturbed by the proposed residential development. The ditch size and capacity have been reviewed in the report and are shown to be adequate. Comment No. 7 • The drainage of the site during the 100-year storm has been designed so that the developed flow rates are less than the existing flow rates to the downstream storm sewer system. Comment No. 8 ■ A discussion of the relocation of the Reno-Juchem irrigation ditch has been included in the report. The outfall of the proposed system was determined by the existing ditch location and invert. The proposed pipeline does not conflict with the existing ditch along the eastern border of the property. Comment No. 9 • The P.E. seal and signature will be provided on the final drainage study as requested. Drainage Study (Appendix) comments: Comment No. 1 ■ Melody Homes has provided additional Right-of-Way for the future construction of Ridge Road, including portions of Right-of-Way not a part of Skyline Filing 3. Details have been provided for the layout and overall design of Ridge Road where it relates to the Skyline Filing 3 property. Complete Ridge Road construction plans have not been included with this submittal. Comment No. 2 ■ The historical runoff from the industrial site into the residential detention pond is included in the pond calculations. Calculations have also been included to determine the release from the future industrial detention pond. Ms. Mary Austin March 31, 2003 Page 12 Comment No. 3 ■ Basin K design information has been included as requested. Comment No. 4 ■ P.E. seal and signature will be provided on the final drainage study as requested. Drainage Plan comments: Comment No. 1 ■ Melody Homes has provided additional Right-of-Way for the future construction of Ridge Road, including portions of Right-of-Way not a part of Skyline Filing 3. Details have been provided for the layout and overall design of Ridge Road where it relates to the Skyline Filing 3 property. Complete Ridge Road construction plans have not been included with this submittal. Comment No. 2 • A detailed cross section of the existing open channel along the east side of the site has been included as requested. Comment No. 3 ■ The inlets on Oak Street (now renamed Newcombe Street) have not been relocated to the sump. The sump shown in the profile view is the pan located at the intersection of Newcombe Street and W. 53rd Avenue. The inlets have been designed as on-grade inlets. Comment No. 4 • The design of the underdrain system will be provided following the design of the sanitary and water lines by the Clear Creek Water and Sanitation District. Comment No. 5 ■ P.E. seal and signature will be provided on the final drainage plan as requested. Grading and Erosion Control Plan comments: Comment No. 1 • Final design for the industrial site is not being provided at this time. The industrial site will be graded with the development of the residential portion. Erosion controls have been provided for the rough grading of the site in the erosion control plan for the residential development. Comment No. 2 ■ In the event of State 3 drought conditions are declared during construction, a temporary erosion control plan will be provided. Ms. Mary Austin March 31, 2003 Page 13 Street Construction Drawings comments: Comment No. 1 ■ The streets have been redesigned using the correct K-values for the vertical curves as requested. Comment No. 2 ■ Melody Homes has provided additional Right-of-Way for the future construction of Ridge Road, including portions of Right-of-Way not a part of Skyline Filing 3. Details have been provided for the layout and overall design of Ridge Road where it relates to the Skyline Filing 3 property. Complete Ridge Road construction plans have not been included with this submittal. Comment No. 3 • The street names have been labeled on the plans as requested. Comment No. 4 • Utilities are now shown on the overall site plan and appropriate plan views as requested. Comment No. 5 • A note regarding City Code, Section 26-412(3)(a) has been added to the plans as requested. Comment No. 6 • A detail for the low-density residential driveways has been added as requested. Comment No. 7 • A note has been added regarding the labeling of all manhole lids as requested. Comment No. 8 • No comment response required. Comment No. 9 ■ Melody Homes has provided additional Right-of-Way for the future construction of Ridge Road, including portions of Right-of-Way not a part of Skyline Filing 3. Details have been provided for the layout and overall design of Ridge Road where it relates to the Skyline Filing 3 property. Complete Ridge Road construction plans have not been included with this submittal. Ms. Mary Austin March 31, 2003 Page 14 Comment No. 10 ■ The curb taper detail has been removed based on revised plans. Comment No. 11 • The design of the underdrain system will be provided following the design of the sanitary and water lines by the Clear Creek Water and Sanitation District. Survey Department Final Plat comments: Comment No. 1 ■ The legal description of the Subdivision has been revised as requested. Comment No. 2 Melody Homes has agreed to convey to the city the necessary tracts for the future Columbine Basin improvements. The developer's agreement includes language requiring Melody Homes' fair contribution toward the future construction of the open channel by Wheat Ridge/Arvada/UDFCD. In the interim, a roadside ditch has been provided to accommodate the current runoff in this area. Until conditions warrant maintenance of the fully constructed drainage way by the city, the adjacent property owner or the HOA shall provide interim maintenance within these tracts and/or easements. The conditions should be detailed in the Subdivision Agreement. Comment No. 3 ■ The zoning for the proposed development and the surrounding areas has been indicated on the plat as requested. Comment No. 4 ■ A case history box has been included on the plat as requested. Comment No. 5 • The 20' easement for the realigned Reno-Juchem Irrigation Ditch has been shown on the plat as requested. Comment No. 6 Right-of-Way monuments will be set at the specified locations as requested. The monument type will be set per the City of Wheat Ridge requirements as requested. Comment No. 7 ■ No comment response required. Ms. Mary Austin March 31, 2003 Page 15 Comment No. 8 The boundaries for the existing and proposed detention areas have been defined as requested. Wording revised as requested. Final Development Plan comments: Comment No. 1 ■ The legal description and boundary have been revised as requested. Comment No. 2 • The Reno-Juchem Irrigation System has been identified as requested. Comment No. 3 ■ The total area of the subdivision has been provided in feet as requested. Comment No. 4 ■ The Basis of Bearing statement has been corrected as requested. Comment No. 5 ■ Street names have been labeled on the plans as requested. Comment No. 6 Melody Homes has agreed to convey to the city the necessary tracts for the future Columbine Basin improvements. The developer's agreement includes language requiring Melody Homes' fair contribution toward the future construction of the open channel by Wheat Ridge/Arvada/UDFCD. In the interim, a roadside ditch has been provided to accommodate the current runoff in this area. Until conditions warrant maintenance of the fully constructed drainage way by the city, the adjacent property owner or the HOA shall provide interim maintenance within these tracts and/or easements. The conditions should be detailed in the Subdivision Agreement. The boundaries for the existing and proposed detention areas have been defined as requested. Traf><e Engineering Department Comment No. 1 No comment response required. Comment No. 2 0 The traffic study includes an overall street network map in the report as requested. Ms. Mary Austin March 31, 2003 Page 16 Comment No. 3 The TIS study states that Skyline Filing No. 3 would have one direct access to Ridge Road and one shared access with Skyline Filing No. 2 to the west. The shared access to the west was originally Parfet Street. The updated site plan replaces Parfet Street with Oak Street as the referenced shared access road. Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 site traffic was assigned to Ridge Road accesses at Nelson Street and Parfet/Oak Street. Figures have been updated to the correct street names as requested. Comment No. 4 • See previous response. Comment No. 5 Although Parfet Street will not connect to Ridge Road at this time, Oak Street will. The site traffic assignment shown in Figure 4 accurately reflects the situation. If Parfet Street were to connect to Ridge Road, Skyline Filing No. 3 site traffic is unlikely to use this access. Nelson Street and Oak Street provide direct access to Ridge Road. The study allowed for four vehicles during the AM peak and 6 vehicles during the PM peak using the Oak Street access. If Parfet Street were to connect, at most 6 vehicles from Skyline Filing No. 3 would utilize the access. Traffic Planner Street Construction Plans comments: Comment No. 1 ■ No comment response required. Comment No. 2 • Melody Homes has provided additional Right-of-Way for the future construction of Ridge Road, including portions of Right-of-Way not a part of Skyline Filing 3. Details have been provided for the layout and overall design of Ridge Road where it relates to the Skyline Filing 3 property. Complete Ridge Road construction plans have not been included with this submittal. Comment No. 3 A maintenance agreement has been included as requested. Appropriate maintenance of the industrial property is the responsibility of the property owner. The industrial site is currently, and shall remain, owned by the State Land Board as administered by Rich Scheirburg. Ms. Mary Austin March 31, 2003 Page 17 Comment No. 4 The development has been designed with attached sidewalks rather than detached with a treelawn. The landscaping for the development has been included in the Final Development Plan. Subdivision Improvement Agreement ■ The Subdivision Improvement Agreement has been included with this submittal as requested. Melody homes will work with the city on the developer's conditions. Application for Minor Dumping/Landfill Permit ■ The Application for Minor Dumping/Landfill Permit has been included with this submittal as requested. Public Improvements Cost Estimate and Guarantee ■ A preliminary cost estimate for the residential lots will be forwarded under separate cover within one week of this submittal. Right-of-Way Construction Permit/Licensing ■ Please advise when to obtain the required Right-of-Way Construction Permit. We trust the above satisfactorily address the comments received February 20, 2003. Should you have any concerns please contact me at 303-694-2300 or at wca@kmdenver.com. Sincerely, KIRKHAM MICHAEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS G Ad,Wi C&A William Curtis Archdeacon PE, PLS Division Manager Colorado Land Development Cc: Darrel Pennington, Melody Homes Tim Eversoll, KM File M020312 " Homes W- a D.R. HORTON COMPANY March 27, 2003 Mary Austin, AICP Planner City of Wheat Ridge 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Subject: Second Submittal, Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 Dear Ms Austin This letter is to address certain comments prepared in your response dated February 12, 2003. We have endeavored to address each item as you have indicated. Even so, there were still a few items where we need to explain our intent and make sure that the documents clearly reflect what we are proposing. Residential & Industrial Melody is constructing the residential portion of the site as shown on the construction plans. Though rough grading, minor drainage way, and detention improvements are, or may be, needed on the Industrial site, appropriate maintenance is the responsibility of the industrial site property owner. The Industrial site is currently, and shall remain, owned by the State Land Board as administered by Rich Scheirburg. As requested we have denoted the type of maintenance needed within the Industrial area in accordance with municipal standards on the grading and erosion control plans. Additionally, the City and Melody agree that a separate Final Development Plan process is necessary to establish requirements with this parcel. The industrial site should also be required to implement a separate SIA when associated development occurs. Common areas dedicated by the plat to the HOA will receive the appropriate maintenance by that entity. Issues regarding interim conditions such as initial drainage structures along the southerly property line and scope of maintenance should be detailed in the Subdivision Improvements agreement. 11031 Sheridan Boulevard 9 Westminster, CO 80020 • 303.466.1831 • Fax 303.466.1838 • www.meIodyhomesinc.com • Page 2 Ridge Road: March 27, 2003 As you are aware Melody has taken it upon them to provide additional right-of-way for the future construction of Ridge Road, including portions of right-of-way not a part of Skyline filing 3. We have agreed to pay our fair share for improvements to Ridge Road fronting the Skyline Filing 2 property to the City of Arvada. They will use those funds, either independently or jointly with Wheatridge, to improve Ridge Road when appropriate. Ridge Road will remain in its existing condition West of Filing 3 for the foreseeable future. We propose that the Wheatridge accept similar payment at the time of Subdivision Agreement approval for the portion of Ridge Road that fronts Filing No.3. If Ridge Road is constructed at this time the improved Northern edge will not extend past Filing 3 in either direction, there will be a problem with matching new grades with existing grades and the City will incur the additional responsibility of ultimate maintenance of road improvements that are of no current benefit. We have also agreed to provide details for the layout and overall design of Ridge Road where it relates to our property. However, we have not provided a complete Ridge Road construction plan document with the second submittal. To the greatest extent possible minor occurrences within Ridge Road as a result of the residential should not be reflected in the planning documents but rather can be included in the residential SIA Columbine Drainage way Improvements, Ownership, and Maintenance (tracts A&B): Based on your comments it appears that the city intends that the residential HOA maintain all open space tracts. We need to reach agreement with the city to properly differentiate maintenance and ownership responsibilities between the industrial and residential Parcels. Urban Drainage has proposed major improvements including a 30-foot wide major drainage channel as outlined in the Columbine Drainage study. We agree to convey to the city necessary tracts for these future improvements. To our knowledge these regional improvements will not be completed within the near future. Since the improvements required shall not be of any benefit at this time it seems reasonable to include language in the developer's agreement requiring our fair contribution toward the future construction of the drainage channel by Westminster/Arvada/UDFCD. In the interim we will improve the road side ditch to accommodate current runoff in this area. It is reasonable, until conditions warrant maintenance of the fully constructed regional drainage way by the City, that the adjacent property owner or the HOA perform interim maintenance within these tracts and/or easements. These conditions should be detailed in the Subdivision Agreement. • Page 3 March 27, 2003 Architectural Conformance and/or Standards (character of development The Outline Development Plan specified under the title "CHARACTER OF DEVELOPMENT" several statements that fail to generally describe the community. In an effort to avoid establishing limiting language on the plan that would require future amendments the following revised language is proposed and has been noted on the plan. "The theme and character represented by this plan is consistent with and similar to the neighboring Skyline Estates Filing No. 1 and Skyline Estates Filing No. 2 communities. The architectural elevations included with this document represent the general design, style and quality of homes to be constructed in the Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 community. The intent of the community is to provide quality housing with homes ranging from 1,500 sf to over 3,000 sf. These homes include a variety of styles, including, ranch, two story and multi-level homes. Home varieties shall also include various garage stylings and configurations." Subdivision Improvements Agreement: For your convenience we are preparing conditions for Exhibit B and the Engineers Cost Estimate to incorporate in a draft SIA. We will forward this document under separate cover within one week of the second submittal. Should you have any questions or need further information please feel free to contact me at: 303 - 466 -1831 xt 1067. Sincerely, 1 f ABC `?'P,'Z4U47 Darrel Pennington Community Planner, Melody Homes, Inc C: Bill Archdeacon, Kirkham Michael 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 3031235-2846 Fax: 303/235-2857 The City of Wheat Ridge February 12, 2003 Roger G. Hollard Melody Homes 11031 Sheridan Boulevard, Suite A Westminster, Colorado 80020-3258 RE: Skyline Estates Filing 3 - First Submittal Dear Mr. Hollard: I have completed my initial review of the above-mentioned project, and I have the following comments: General: 1. I have included comments from all responding agencies. Any questions regarding these comments should be directed to the agency that created the comment. 2. The street labeled as Oak Street that connects from Nelson to W 53rd Avenue should be renamed to either Newman or Newcombe, whichever most closely lines up with the Denver area street grid. The street labels should then be changed on all three documents, ODP, FDP, and Final Plat 3. Pursuant to Section 26-421 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, a subdivider shall contribute parkland dedication to the City. The Parks and Recreation Department has indicated that a fee in lieu will be required. This fee is based upon valuation of the land. Since the land is held by the State and has no assessed value, the parkland dedication fee cannot be quantified at this time. When such information becomes available, the fee in lieu of parkland dedication will be assessed. 4. You should be aware that the fencing detailed on the Final Development Plan for the common areas will require a separate permit at the time of construction. Outline Development Plan: 1. The title of the ODP should be amended to read, "Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 - Outline Development Plan -An Official Development Plan in the City of Wheat Ridge..." 2. In the Legal Description, line 2 should be amended to read, "...6th principal meridian, City of Wheat Ridge,..." 3. The date blocks in all certification blocks should be changed from "2002" to "20 " 4. The Planning Commission certification should be changed from "Approved this..." to "Recommended for Approval..." 5. The certification line for the Planning and Development Director should be changed to read, "Community Development Director" and placed under the heading City Certification. 6. The City Council Certification block should be changed to read, by the Wheat Ridge City Council." and should be titled City Certification. 7. In the Owner's Certification, line three should be changed to read, accordance with the uses, restrictions... " 8. A Case History box should be added with the following case numbers listed: "WZ-02- 13" and "WS-02-01 9. The Development Schedule should be amended to better reflect the actual project status. 10. Please add an "Ownership/Unified Control Statement" to page one of the ODP. This should include, among other things, a written statement describing anticipated future ownership character, the proposed manner of maintaining unified control throughout the planning, development, use, operation and continued maintenance of the planned development. Of particular importance is the control and maintenance of common areas and tracts. 11. A table should be added to page two that addresses the usage of each of the tracts. 12. Please label the proposed streets on the site plan. 13. The site plan shows two tracts labeled Tract H. One of these tracts should be amended to a unique label. 14. The Industrial Lot is detailed at 2.42 acres in size on the Outline Plan while the Final Plat details this area as 1.73 acres in size. Please clarify. 15. An access point should be shown for the industrial lot. Staff feels this access point should be on the western property line of the industrial lot on Oak Street. 16. The site plan details an irrigation easement or tract in block three between lots 9 and 10. This tract needs to be labeled and included in the table listing all tracts. 17. Since the Outline Development Plan is the document that establishes the zoning and general development concept, a large scale drawing showing fine detail is not absolutely necessary. If possible, please combine the site drawing shown on pages 2 and 3 onto a single page as long as the scale is not less than 1"=100'. 18. The site drawing on the Outline Development Plan should show, at a minimum: • a general indication of areas to be landscaped • property boundaries • existing and proposed lot lines, easements and rights-of-way on and adjacent to the site, adjacent zoning, land use, streets, streams, ditches, etc. • location of all existing, alleys, easements, drainage areas, parks and other areas to be reserved or dedicated to public use. • approximate location and extent of major use areas. • any significant vegetation or land use features within or adjacent to the site which may influence development. 19. A statement needs to be added declaring that no portion of the property is located within the 100-year flood plain. 20. The Outline Development Plan needs to clearly delineate the areas of PRD (residential) zoning and PID (industrial) zoning. 21. The Outline Development Plan. should address all the development standards for both the residential zoning and the industrial zoning. This is typically best accomplished by creating a development standards table with regulations for the industrial and residential areas. I have included an example of this table. 22. Since this development has PRD zoning, certain standards may be varied from the City's standard residential districts. Staff is not opposed to a reduced front yard setback requirement from the typical 30-foot requirement in Wheat Ridge. We propose a minimum front setback standard of 20 feet with a requirement for staggering the front line of homes constructed on adjacent lots by a minimum of 5 feet. 23. To be consistent with the City's most dense single family residential district (R1 C) the maximum building coverage should be limited to a 40% maximum instead of 75%. 24. A site data table is needed which contains project data for the entire site including total site area, area in PRD zoning, area in PID zoning, area in open space tracts, area in drainage tracts, number of lots, typical lot sizes and dimensions, calculations for net and gross density. 25. Residential development standards to be included: • Discuss the materials to be used on the residential structures including the minimum amount of brick or stone. Be as specific regarding overall fagade treatment as possible. • Residential structures on corner lots or on lots adjacent to open space tracts shall include, at a minimum, decorative wainscoting treatment in brick or stone and a minimum of 2 windows on the side of the structure facing that element. • The front line of homes shall be staggered on adjacent lots a minimum of 5 feet. • Home models shall be interspersed so that the same home plan is not constructed on adjacent lots. • Porches, Decks, Patios and Balconies - if open on at least two sides may encroach into a required front yard setback up to eight feet or into a side or rear yard setback a maximum of one-third the required setback. • Architectural features such as cornices, eave beltcourses, bay windows, sills or canopies may extend or project into a required setback a maximum of thirty inches. 26. Industrial development standards to be included: • Buffering of Industrial Areas Whenever a parking lot is placed between the public right-of-way and the structure(s), a screening of the parking area shall be established between the right-of-way and the parking area. This view-obscuring screen shall be composed of live plantings, berms, fences or walls, or a combination thereof. The height of the screening will be subject to the sight distance triangle requirements as outlined on this development plan. Outdoor Storage for the Industrial Lot Outdoor storage associated with the primary use of the industrial lot is allowed as an accessory use when explicitly identified on an approved Final Development Plan. The materials to be stored must be screened by a six-foot view-obscuring fence, wall or landscaping which fully conceals such facilities from adjacent properties and public streets. The height of any storage materials shall not exceed the height of the fence. Architectural finishes shall include exterior materials of brick, stone, wood and glass. Building fagade treatment shall include elements that provide a human scale, create texture and relief and incorporate architectural fenestration and articulation. Metal buildings are prohibited. • Every industrial use shall be operated in its entirety within a completely enclosed building with the exception of outdoor storage areas identified on an approved Final Development Plan. • Industrial development shall meet the requirements of Section 26-505, Industrial Performance Standards of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws. 27 The Permitted Uses sections should be revised. The list of uses for the PRD zoning (residential) and the PID zoning (industrial) should be separated and discussed more specifically. Permitted Uses for the PRD Residential Lots The permitted residential uses should not include townhomes, condos or second- story residences. The residential uses may be defined by simply stating: single- family dwellings, customary accessory structures such as detached garages and storage sheds and customary ancillary uses. If model homes are anticipated, they should be included in the permitted residential uses. An example of a list of Permitted Uses for the PID (industrial) Zoning follows: 1. Animal Veterinary Hospitals and Clinics (no cremation) 2. Antique Stores 3. Apparel and Accessory Stores 4. Appliance Stores (including Incidental Service and Repairs) 5. Bakeries, Retail 6. Banks, Loan and Finance Offices 7. Bicycle Stores 8. Blueprinting, Photostatic Copying and Other Similar Reproduction Services 9. Book Stores, Newsstands, Stationery and Card Stores 10. Building Contractor's Service Shop and Storage Yard Incidental to an Office/Showroom Principal Use. This Shall Include Carpenters, Painters, Roofers, Electricians, Plumbers, Heating and Air Conditioning Contractors and Similar Uses as Approved by the Director of Community Development. 11. Butcher Shops, Including Meat, Poultry or Seafood Stores 12. Cabinet and Woodworking Shops 13. Camera and Photographic Service and Supply Stores 14. Caterers 15. Department or Variety Stores 16. Drug Stores 17. Eating Establishments, Sit Down 18. Electrical Supplies and Service 19. Equipment Rental Agencies 20. Floral Shops 21. Furniture Stores 22. Garden Supply Stores 23. Gift, Novelty or Souvenir Stores 24. Greenhouses and Landscape Nurseries 25. Grocery or Convenience Stores, no Gasoline Pumps 26. Hair, Nail and Cosmetic Services 27. Hardware Stores 28. Hobby and Craft Stores 29. Home Furnishing Stores 30. Home Improvement Supply Stores, Includes Interior Decorating 31. Jewelry Stores 32. Laundry and Dry Cleaning Shops 33. Leather Goods and Luggage Stores 34. Linen Supply 35. Liquor Stores 36. Locksmith 37. Lumber Yards and Building Supply Stores 38. Manufacturing, Processing, Assembly or Light Industrial Operations 39. Medical and Dental Offices or Clinics 40. Music Stores 41. Office Supply Stores 42. Offices: General Administrative, Business and Professional Offices 43. Optical Stores 44. Paint and Wallpaper Stores 45. Pet Stores 46. Pharmacies 47. Picture Framing Shops 48. Research Laboratories, Offices and Facilities for Research 49. Shoe Repair and Sales Shops 50. Shops for Custom Work or for Making Articles, Materials or Commodities to be Sold at Retail on the Premises 51. Sporting Goods Stores 52. Studio for Professional Work or Teaching of Fine Arts, Photography, Music, Drama or Dance 53. Tailor, Dressmaking or Clothing Alteration Shops 54. Television, Radio, Small Appliance or Computer Repair and Service Shops 55. Tobacco Stores 56. Toy Stores 57. Video Rentals 58. Warehouse/Office (Maximum 75% Total Area as Warehouse) 59. Similar Uses as Determined by the Director of Community Development Pursuant to Section 26-307 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws. Final Development Plan Review: 1. Please remove pages 5 and 6 from the next FDP submittal. These pages will be reviewed, but they will not be recorded as part of this FDP. 2. The title of the FDP should be amended to read, "Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 - Final Development Plan - An Official Development Plan in the City of Wheat Ridge..." 3. A Case History box should be added which lists the following case numbers: "WZ-02- 13" and "WS-02-01". 4. Eliminate the lines of Case # and Map # in the upper comer. 5. On page one under Tract Information, change the ownership of Tracts A and B to "HOA". Ownership of all tracts must be retained by the Homeowner's Association. 6. Please revise the Planning Commission certification block to read: "recommended for approval..." 7. Please revise the City Council certification block to read: "...by the Wheat Ridge City Council..." 8. Please change all certification blocks to read: "20 " 9. In line two of the Legal Description please add the words "City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson..." 10. A typical road section for Ridge Road needs to be included on page 2. Please assure that it includes the required detached walk and tree lawn. 11. Please clarify that all utility lines will be placed underground. 12. Please add a development standards table on page one. This table should detail the development standards that were defined in the Outline Development Plan, and compare them with the standards provided on the Final Development Plan. This table should address such things as: land use, maximum building coverage, minimum lot size, minimum landscaping, parking, setbacks, accessory structures, number of residential lots, maximum building height, net and gross density, etc 13. Under the Zoning Land Use Table, the maximum building coverage for residential zoning shall be 40%, not 75%. 14. A note should be added to page one, under the development standards table, indicating that the Industrial lot is not part of this Final Development Plan and prior to any development on that lot an approved FDP will be required pursuant to Section 26-311 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws." 15. Please add the square footage for each lot on pages 3 and 4. 16. Please label the streets on pages 3 and 4. 17. Page 9 details Tracts G and I as being landscaped with native seed. It would be desirable to change this area to a low water drought resistant sod as planned for the tracts to the north. 18. Tracts A and B are to be owned and maintained by the HOA. An easement covering these tracts should be dedicated to the City of Wheat Ridge for drainage channel maintenance of the Columbine basin. The City will in turn make arrangements with UDFCD for the actual maintenance work performed on the channel. The HOA shall be responsible for maintaining the fringe area of the tract (outside the actual channel). 19. Please be more clear by adding, to the note that addresses the landscaping for the industrial lot on page 9, a statement that an interim treatment of native seed will be provided and maintained until development occurs. 20. Describe and show the location of any temporary or interim uses of land or buildings, such as model homes and parking. 21. In the Owner's Certification, line four should be changed to read, "...accordance with the uses, restrictions... " 22. In the Notary Certification, the word "commission" is misspelled. 23. Please provide an elevations page that details typical elevations for the residential structures including information regarding materials to be used. The details should reveal the minimum amounts of brick or stone by facade location and percentage. 24. Please address specifics of mail delivery as approved by the post office. Will any centralized mail boxes need to be accommodated? 25. The Tree Planting List on page 7 details 15 evergreen trees to be planted in the common areas, however the plans show 37. 26. Please change the Planning and Development signature line to read "Community Development Director" and place it under a heading of City Certifications. Add a signature line for the Director of Public Works. 27. The site plan needs to show the required public improvements to be constructed along Ridge Road. 28. Nothing is shown on the landscape plan for ground treatment along the east side of Tract C. Please specify what is proposed. 29. If any residential project signage is proposed for either entranceway on Ridge Road or 54th Avenue, the location must be shown on the Final Development Plan and a detail included. The detail must convey materials, height and overall size. 30. A note should be added to the Final Development Plan that reads: "Recorded streetscape maintenance agreements will be required to ensure that maintenance of the landscaping within the adjacent right-of-way is the responsibility of the homeowner's association. " 31. A copy of the covenants for the Homeowner's Association is needed for review. Please clarify whether the HOA for this filing will be part of the HOA for any other filings. 32. Residential street lighting needs to be shown and detailed with type of fixture, illumination, height and location. 33. A development schedule is needed on page 1 indicating any phasing and approximate dates for project beginning and completion. 34. The FDP needs to show any traffic regulation devices, signage and striping (crosswalks) needed to facilitate safe movement of vehicles and pedestrians. 35. The fence along the south side of lot 3, block 2 is not permitted to be 6 feet in height within the required front yard setback. Please adjust this on the drawing on page 8. 36. The fencing along the west side of the lots in block 3, adjacent to the lots in Filing 2, appears to be shown as the three rail fence type. Please verify whether this is correct or clarify what is being proposed, even if it is to be constructed as part of Filing 2. 37. A note needs to be added stating that the home models shall be interspersed with no two lots adjacent to each other containing the same model. 38. More information is needed regarding any specific architectural elements or design requirements in Filing 2 and how they compare to what will be offered in Filing 3. As such, additional architectural requirements may be requested. We want to assure a compatible product to give the entire development a unified character. 39. All streets shall be designed to accommodate detached sidewalks. Modify the site plan sheets and typical street sections accordingly. Provide information regarding sidewalk requirements of Filing 2. 40. Please clearly distinguish and dimension the sidewalks on all plan sheets. 41. On the landscape plan please include a detail of typical front yard landscaping to be provided for each residential lot. This should include information about what is provided when each home is constructed such as minimum number of trees and shrubs and sod or other ground cover. Per the City's regulations, each lot shall have a minimum of one street tree for each 70 feet of frontage. Be advised that certificates of occupancy are not released until front yard landscaping and street trees are in place. 42. Per the City's regulations, ornamental trees are required to have a minimum caliper of 2 inches. Please make the appropriate modification to the landscape plan legend. 43. In all tracts, deciduous street trees must be provided at the rate of 1 tree per 70 feet of frontage or portion thereof. Please assure that all tracts are meeting this standard. Evergreen and ornamental trees do not qualify as street trees. The tree requirement should not be construed to mean trees planted 70 feet on center. 44. If tract H is to be constructed as a drainage feature with this FDP then there appears to be no reason why it cannot be landscaped, at a minimum, with ground cover and required street trees. In an industrial area street trees are required at the rate of a tree per every 30 feet of street frontage or portion thereof. 45. A detached sidewalk and tree lawn, consistent with the cross-section, is required along Ridge Road. This must be shown on the FDP. Ridge Road is identified as a streetscape corridor in the City's Streetscape and Architectural Design Manual. For that reason, street trees along Ridge Road are required to be a minimum of 3 inches in caliper. These street trees are required at the rate of 1 tree for every 30 feet of frontage or portion thereof. Plat Review: 1. The County Clerk and Recorders Certification should include a signature line for the Deputy Clerk. There should also be a signature line for the Jefferson County Clerk and Recorder. 2. A case history box should be added to the plat. Within this case history box, case numbers WZ-02-13 and WS-02-01 should be listed. 3. Note number 9 on sheet 1 should be amended. Per Urban Drainage and Flood Control District comments, these tracts are not accepted by the UDFCD. Tracts A and B should be owned by the HOA. There should be an easement that runs over Tracts A and B to the City of Wheat Ridge for conveyance of drainage through the Columbine Basin. The City will make arrangements with UDFCD for maintenance of the channel while the HOA will be responsible for maintaining the fringe area outside of the actual channel. This should be illustrated on plat document as clearly as possible. A note needs to be added stating that the homeowner is responsible for maintaining the landscaped area in front of the lot between the detached sidewalk and the curb. 4. The certification block for the Director of Planning and Development should be changed to read Community Development Director. 5. Notes number 6-8 should be replaced with one note that reads: "Ten-foot (10') wide easements are hereby granted on private property adjacent to all public streets and front and rear property lines of each lot in the subdivision or platted area. Five-foot (5') wide easements are hereby granted on private property adjacent to all side lot lines of each lot in the subdivision or platted area. These easements are dedicated for the installation, maintenance, and replacement of electric, gas, television cable, drainage and telecommunications facilities. Utilities shall also be permitted within any access easements and private streets in the subdivision. Permanent structures and water meters shall not be permitted within said utility easements." All associated utility notes on pages 2 and 3 should be revised 6. A note should be added that reads, "The storm detention area here shown as shall be constructed and maintained by the owner and subsequent owners, heirs, successors and assigns. In the event that such construction and maintenance is not performed by said owner, the City of Wheat Ridge shall have the right to enter such area and perform necessary work, the cost of which said owner, heirs, successors, and assigns agrees to pay. No building or structure will be constructed in the detention area and no changes or alterations affecting the hydraulic characteristics of the detention area will be made without the approval of the Director of Public Works." 7. Please correct the street label of "West 53th Avenue" to 53`a 8. The word "additional" below Tract B is misspelled on page 2. 9. The word "separate" below the Ridge Road Right-of-way is misspelled on page 2. 10. There is an unlabeled Tract of land located on page 3 between lots 5 and 6 in Block 1. 11. The words "City of Wheat Ridge" should be added to line 3 of the legal description on page 1. 12. Please add a data table that contains the total area to be subdivided, the size of the largest lot, size of the smallest lot, and average lot size. 13. The easement for the proposed relocation of the Juchem Ditch needs to be delineated. 14. This development is subject to the City's Street Width Designation process. This requires one hearing before City Council to establish the actual street pavement width for all proposed streets. This will be done concurrently with the rest of the application. A City fee of $800 applies to this process and needs to be submitted prior to this case being scheduled for public hearing. Please make all required changes prior to resubmittal. You should be aware that any changes required by any of the referral agencies might impact my comments. The City charges a resubmittal fee for any corrections required past the second submittal. If any changes are required after the next submittal, you will be subject to these fees. At the time of your next submittal, please submit five (5) full sets of plans for review. If you have any further questions, feel free to give me a call. I can be reached at: 303.235.2852. Sincerely, Mary Au'stitf, AIC✓ Planner, City of Wheat Ridge Development Standards Table for Outline Development Plan Item Industrial Residential Maximum Lot 80% building and hardscape 40% building coverage Coverage coverage Landscaping Minimum 20% Refer to Section 26-502 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws Minimum Setbacks - Front 50 feet 20 feet 1 Side 5 feet per story' 7.5 feet z Rear 10 feet for a one story 10 feet z building, plus an additional five feet per story' the front of each home shall be staggered a minimum of 5' if adjacent to a dedicated right- z if adjacent to dedicated right-of- of-way, minimum setback of way, minimum setback of twenty thirty feet. feet. Lighting Refer to Section 26-503 of the Refer to Section 26-503 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws Wheat Ridge Code of Laws Parking Refer to Section 26-501 of the Refer to Section 26-501 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws Wheat Ridge Code of Laws Architecture As approved on the Final As approved on the Final Development Plan and in Development Plan accordance with the Streetscape and Architectural Design Manual Access Access only from Oak Street Signage Refer to Article VII of the Refer to Article VII of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws Wheat Ridge Code of Laws Fencing and Sight Refer to Section 26-603 of the Refer to Section 26-603 of the Distance Triangle Wheat Ridge Code of Laws Wheat Ridge Code of Laws Accessory Buildings Refer to Section 26-204 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws Maximum Height 50 feet 35 feet: single family dwelling 20 feet: detached garage or shed Minimum Lot Size No limitation provided all square feet other requirements can be met Minimum Lot Width No limitation provided all square feet other requirements can be met City of Wheat I~dge I Department of Public Works January 28, 2003 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (303) 235-2868 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 FAX (303) 235-2857 Mr. Steven P. Kocher, P.E. Kirkham Michael Consulting Engineers 5600 South Quebec Street, Suite 200D Englewood, Colorado 80111 Re: Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 - First Review Comments of Final Drainage Study, Grading & Erosion Control Plan, Surveying Comments & Street Construction Plans Dear Mr. Kocher, I have completed the first review of the above referenced documents for the Skyline Estates Subdivision received on November 06, 2002, and have the following comments: Drainage Study (Discussion) 1. An NPDES permit shall be obtained from the State of Colorado Department of Health - Water Quality Control Division. A copy of this permit is to be submitted to the City of Wheat Ridge. 2. Please include the hydraulics for the Ridge Road improvement into the report. This may include street capacity calculations, inlet locations, etc. 3. The Columbine Basin Study requires that the open channel in the Wheat Ridge section be constructed. Please see the report the design details for the channel as shown in the Columbine Basin Study. 4. Please relocate the inlets on Oak Street to the sump area near Ridge Road as redlined on the plans. 5. The future development of the industrial site will need to be included in the drainage plan and design. The development of the Industrial site will require a separate detention pond; the detention pond for the industrial site will need a release location. The logical location would be the existing pond to the east. Therefore, the pond should be sized to include historic flows from the property. 6. The drainage ponds and open channel along the eastern portion of the site are subject to City Code, Section 26-412(C)(1)(g) which states that the following improvements shall be provided by the developer to the current department of public works standards: Installation of landscaping in areas held in common by a subdivision's homeowners association The open channel shall be designed per UDFCD requirements using Volume 3 for the design and BMP requirements. The velocities of the runoff in the open channel shall satisfy the UDFCD requirement to reduce scour effect. Please reflect this in the report and plans. Please label the surface type to be placed in the open channel on the drawing as well as calling it out in the report. Please discuss the maintenance of the open channel that will be required by the HOA. Skline reviewl.itr 7. Please provide development outfall information or any off-site drainage improvement to address any impact downstream as a result of the developed flows. 8. Please discuss the relocation of the Reno-Juchem Ditch in the report and discuss the conflict the outfall location conflict area with the open channel along the east side of the development. Also, discuss any solution accepted by the ditch company. 9. Please provide P.E. seal and signature on the final approved report. Drainage Study (Appendix) 1. The appendix shall include calculations for the Ridge Road improvements such as inlet calculations, locations, and proposed street capacity. 2. Please include calculations for the industrial site - historic runoff to be provided in adjacent pond. 3. Please provide basin K design information. The design shall meet UDFCD criteria for open channel design. 4. Please provide P.E. seal and signature on the final approved report. Drainage Plan 1. Please provide drainage plan for Ridge Road improvements. 2. Provide a detailed cross section of the existing open channel along the east side of the site. 3. Per the plan, the inlet location is not placed at the sump location; please relocate the inlet on Oak Street to the sump area near Ridge Road. 4. Provide a typical detail for the under drain system where it daylights at the open channel along the east side of the property. 5. Please provide P.E. seal and signature on the final approved report. Please provide 2 signed and stamped sets of the drainage report and plan with the second submittal. Public Works Department will require 2 copies of the final drainage report, civil plans, and FDP plans. Grading & Erosion Control Plan 1. Please provide erosion control for the industrial site and include maintenance language on the plans. 2. In the event the Denver Water Board and Valley Water District declare State 3 drought conditions and adopt rules prohibiting the placement and watering of sod, all areas for which sod was approved on the final development plan shall be protected with temporary erosion control solutions until approved permanent solutions may be placed. The Engineer of Record shall design and submit a temporary erosion control plan to the City of Wheat Ridge for approval and placement in the initial construction. The developer shall be responsible for maintaining all erosion control items. Should the drought conditions improve and the Board and District allow sod placement and watering, the approved landscape plan shall be fully implemented within 120 days of such decision by the Board or District. Street Construction Drawings 1. The K-values calculated require minimum vertical curve design criteria. Please find enclosed a chart with these values and make the necessary changes to the street construction plans as required. 2. Please include the Ridge Road improvements into the construction plans. This is to include plan and profile sheets for the sections to be constructed for the frontage of Filing 42 and Filing #3. 3. Please label the street names on the plans. 4. Please show utilities on the overall site plan and appropriate plan views (i.e.: street lights, inlets Skline reviewl.ltr and manholes). 5. City Code, Section 26-412(3)(a), requires the following: No subdivision or final plat shall be approved unless the plans and specifications al the subdivision provide that all, new utilities shall be placed underground. 6. The access grades for low-density residential driveways are not to exceed 14%. Please see attached detail for clarity of the design. 7. The manhole lids are to be clearly identified as to City Storm Sewer, Irrigation Ditch, or Sanitary Sewer. 8. The city standard details for the street construction plans will be provided to Kirkham Michael electronically for readability purposes. 9. Include Ridge Road proposed street section. 10. Please clarify where the curb taper detail will be applied on the site. Please provide stations on the detail. 11. Please provide a detail for the trench with the sanitation pipe and the under-drain system. The sanitation district shall approve the spacing between the pipes. Survey Comments Final Plat Remarks: 1. The boundary of the Subdivision as shown on both the graphical portion and in the Legal Description on the Plat does not close by 9.46 feet (double-check the bearing along the northerly boundary line). Due to this, the area for the Subdivision boundary as well as the areas and closures for the interior lots and Right-of-Way cannot be checked by the City of Wheat Ridge at this time. 2. The area shown as 35' of Right-of-Way to be used for drainage purposes along Ridge Road, shall be dedicated as a drainage easement to the City of Wheat Ridge and include a note stating that the maintenance of the specific drainage facilities such as inlets, headwalls, outfall structures, etc. within said easement are to be the responsibility of the City of Wheat Ridge. The maintenance of the remainder of the easement area (exclusive of said drainage facilities), including landscaping, shall remain the responsibility of the Skyline Estates Homeowners Association. 3. Please indicate the zoning both on-site and for parcels adjoining the Subdivision. The on-site residential zoning may be placed in the form of a note, while the industrial parcel(s) or parcels with a zone designation other than residential may be placed directly on the graphical portion of the Plat. 4. Need to include a Case History box on Sheet 1 (Case No. WZ-02-13). 5. The 20' easement for the proposed realignment of the Juchem Ditch will need to be shown on the Final Plat. 6. Right-of-Way monuments will need to be set at the following ROW centerline intersection points: a) Nelson Street and Ridge Road b) Nelson Street and West 53rd Avenue c) Nelson Street and Oak Street d) Nelson Street and 50 Avenue (City of Wheat Ridge boundary) e) West 53rd Avenue and Oak Street D West 53rd Avenue and the City boundary (west line of NEIA Section 16) The monument type to be utilized will be a 3" diameter brass cap on a 30" pipe set inside a City of Wheat Ridge range box. The monuments shall be set under the supervision of a Professional Land Surveyor licensed in the State of Colorado per C.R.S. and City monumentation standards (please see attached sheets for City standards), with the top of the brass cap lying 6" below Skline reviewl.ltr finished asphalt grade. The City shall supply the monuments and range box hardware upon request of said PLS. 7. Further comments may be forthcoming pending the response by the State regarding the Right-of- Way dedication along Ridge Road. 8. The boundaries of the areas shown as existing or proposed Detention Areas need to either be defined by being a Non-buildable Tract reserved strictly for storm detention. Please include the standard language required by the City (please see attached sheet for example). Final Development Plan Remarks: 1. Please adjust the Legal Description and the graphical portion of the Final Development Plan to match the boundary as shown on the Final Plat following the Plat corrections. 2. Identify the Reno-Juchem Irrigation System on the Site Plan. 3. At the end of the Legal Description, include the total Subdivision area in square feet as well as in acres. 4. The last line of the Basis of Bearing Statement states that a 2" Aluminum cap monument is stamped "TLS 27601". The Final Plat indicates the number stamped on the monument as PLS 19003. Please make the appropriate correction(s) so that the Final Plat and the FDP match each other. 5. Need to include the street names on the Site Plan. 6. Tracts A and B shown on the plans as R.O.W. to be dedicated to the City, should be revised to reflect the comments made in respect to the Final Plat. The boundaries of the areas shown as existing or proposed Detention Areas need to either be defined by a Detention Easement, or shown as being a Non-buildable Tract reserved strictly for the purpose of stone detention. Include the standard language pertaining to these areas as required by the City (please see the Final Plat). Any questions related to these survey corrections can be addressed to Mr. Dave Brossman, P.L.S. at 303-235-2858. Traffic Engineering A copy of the street construction plans and traffic impact study has been forwarded to the City's Traffic Engineer, Mr. Steve Nguyen, P.E., 303-235-2862 for review and has the following comments: 1. The traffic impact study needs to be prepared and stamped by a Colorado Professional Engineer with experience in transportation engineering. 2. The study needs to include and overall (scaleable) street network map in the report. This map will include street network for Filing No. 2, Filing No. 3 and existing and future adjacent streets, which feed into this area. 3. The number of proposed street constructions to Ridge Road does not agree with the traffic study and the roadway plans. The street network map in the report needs to be revised as it appears in the street improvement plans. 4. Traffic distribution and assignment will need to be re-assessed to reflect the final proposed street network as discussed in comment number 3. Associated capacity and level of service needs to be calculated to accurately reflecting these changes. 5. It appears that the Parfet Street connection will not be implemented at this time, but rather sometime in the future. Please provide two traffic distribution scenarios; one with the Parfet Street connection and one without. Capacity and level of service calculations for the street network will also need to be included in the report to reflect the above scenarios. Address any impact from the changes as necessary. Skline reviewt.ltr Traffic Planner Comments A copy of the Street construction plans has been forwarded to the City's Traffic Engineer, Mr. Dave Mentor, 303-235-2866 for review and has the following comments: 1. Ridge Road is an identified streetscape corridor street and is subject to City Council's adopted Streetscape and Architectural Design Manual requirements. A copy of the Manual is available through the Planning Department for $10.00. 2. Please include information along Ridge Road that reflects the cross-section detail provided previously by the City Traffic Engineer. Various details related to the construction of curb, gutter, and detached sidewalk along Ridge Road are included in that cross section. (A copy of the cross section is attached). 3. A maintenance agreement will need to be signed by the developer prior to first Certificate of Occupancy. This agreement reflects the responsibility the homeowner association (HOA) will have for maintaining vegetation within the R.O.W. and/ or sidewalk easement along Ridge Road - including the treelawn area (landscape strip created through the required construction of curb, gutter, and detached sidewalk along Ridge Road). The HOA will be responsible for maintenance of vegetation not the parcels adjacent to Ridge Road are immediately developed. (A maintenance agreement copy is attached). Maintenance by the HOA will cover all R.O.W. vegetation along Ridge Road in the City of Wheat Ridge R.O.W. 4. In the treelawn, the developer shall install: • Irrigation system • Turf (or other approved ground cover - see Streetscape Manual) • Street trees @35' - 40' spacing; 3" caliper (see Streetscape Manual for approved varieties) Subdivision Improvement Agreement Upon City Council approval of the Final Plat, a Subdivision Improvement Agreement will need be executed by the project owner/developer. For the developer/owner's information and submittal in the second review package, a copy of this Agreement is provided. Please note that there may be additions to this document for this development. Application for Minor Dumping/Landfill Permit Prior to the commencement of any onsite grading, an Application for Dumping/Landfill Permit, along with the fees due will need to be submitted for review and approval. For your information and submittal in the second review package, a copy of this permit is provided. Public Improvements Cost Estimate & Guarantee Prior to any construction commencing for the required public improvements within the right-of-way, an itemized engineer's cost estimate will need to be submitted for review and approval. Upon acceptance of this estimate, a letter of credit reflecting total costs of the approved cost estimate plus 25%, will need to be submitted by the owner/developer for review and approval. Right-of-Way Construction Permit(s)/Licensing Prior to any construction of the public improvements, the necessary right-of-way construction permit(s) and respective licensing will need to be submitted for processing by the City. Skline reviewl.ltr Please return all red-fined prints with the second submittal. If you have any questions, please contact me at 303-235-2868. Sincerely,~ . wL Michael Garcia Development Review Engineer Cc: Greg Knudson, City Engineer Steve Nguyen, Traffic Engineer Dave Brossman, City Surveyor Dave Mentor, Traffic Planner Travis Crane, Planner Mary Austin, Planner File Skline reviewl.ltr . a, C` h 41 . y;E h r N m~ W m] H h r tt E' 11 gal !~.gg R1% _gh CONTACT NUMBER: I DATE RECEIVED: December 17, 2002 DATE REVIEWED: December 27, 2002 SUBDIVISION NAME: Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 SURVEYOR: NAME: George G. Smith, Jr., P.L.S. Kirkham Michael Consulting Engineers ADDRESS: 5600 South Quebec Street, Suite 2000 Englewood, CO 80111 PHONE: 303.694.2300 FAX: 303.694.2822 CITY REPRESENTATIVE: David F. Brossman, P.L.S REMARKS: 1. Please adjust the Legal Description and the graphical portion of the Final Development Plan to match the boundary as shown on the Final Plat following the Plat corrections. 2. Identify the Reno-Juchem Irrigation System on the Site Plan. 3. At the end of the Legal Description, include the total Subdivision area in square feet as well as in acres. 4. The last line of the Basis of Bearing Statement states that a 2" Aluminum cap monument is stamped "PLS 27601". The Final Plat indicates the number stamped on the monument as PLS 19003. Please make the appropriate correction(s) so that the Final Plat and the FDP match each other. 5. Need to include the street names on the Site Plan. 6. Tracts A and B shown as 35' Right-of-Way to be used for drainage purposes, need to be shown as 35' Drainage Easements dedicated to the City of Wheat Ridge. There needs to be a note on the Plat stating that the maintenance of Tracts A & B shall remain the responsibility of the Homeowners Association. 7. The boundaries of the areas shown as existing or proposed Detention Areas need to either be defined by a Detention Easement, or shown as being a Non-buildable Tract reserved strictly for the purpose of storm detention. Include the standard language pertaining to these areas as required by the City (please see the Final Plat). PLEASE RETURN ALL REDLINES WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. SURVEYING REPRESENTATIVE: George G. Smith, Jr., P.L.S. The above comments are as of the date reviewed and may not reflect all comments from other departments or reviewing agencies. CONTACT NUMBER: 1 DATE RECEIVED: December 17, 2002 DATE REVIEWED: December 27, 2002 SUBDIVISION NAME: Skyline Estates Filing No. 3 SURVEYOR: NAME: George G. Smith, Jr., P.L.S. Kirkham Michael Consulting Engineers ADDRESS: 5600 South Quebec Street, Suite 2000 Englewood, CO 80111 PHONE: 303.694.2300 FAX: 303.694.2822 CITY REPRESENTATIVE: David F. Brossman, P.L.S. REMARKS: 1. The boundary of the Subdivision as shown on both the graphical portion and in the Legal Description on the Plat does not close by 9.46 feet (double-check the bearing along the northerly boundary line). Due to this, the area for the Subdivision boundary as well as the areas and closures for the interior lots and Right-of-Way cannot be checked by the City of Wheat Ridge at this time. 2. Tracts A and B shown as 35' Right-of-Way to be used for drainage purposes, need to be shown as 35' Drainage Easements dedicated to the City of Wheat Ridge. There needs to be a note on the Plat stating that the maintenance of Tracts A & B shall remain the responsibility of the Homeowners Association. 3. Please indicate the zoning both on-site and for parcels adjoining the Subdivision. The on- site residential zoning may be placed in the form of a note, while the industrial parcel(s) or parcels with a zone designation other than residential maybe placed directly on the graphical portion of the Plat. 4. Need to include a Case History box on Sheet 1 (Case No. WZ-02-13). 5. The 20' easement for the proposed realignment of the Juchem Ditch will need to be shown on the Final Plat. 6. Right-of-Way monuments will need to be set at the following ROW centerline intersection points: a) Nelson Street and Ridge Road b) Nelson Street and West 53rd Avenue c) Nelson Street and Oak Street d) Nelson Street and 54 ° Avenue (City of Wheat Ridge boundary) e) West 53rd Avenue and Oak Street f) West 53 d Avenue and the City boundary (west line of NEIA Section 16) The monument type to be utilized will be a 3" diameter brass cap on a 30" pipe set inside a City of Wheat Ridge range box. The monuments shall be set under the supervision of a Professional Land Surveyor licensed in the State of Colorado per C.R.S. and City monumentation standards (please see attached sheets for City standards), with the top of the brass cap lying 6" below finished asphalt grade. The City shall supply the monuments and range box hardware upon request of said PLS. 7. Further comments may be forthcoming pending the response by the State regarding the Right-of-Way dedication along Ridge Road. 8. The boundaries of the areas shown as existing or proposed Detention Areas need to either be defined by a Detention Easement, or as being a Non-buildable Tract reserved strictly for storm detention. Please include the standard language required by the City (please see attached sheet for example). PLEASE RETURN ALL REDLINES WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. George G. Smith, Jr., P.L.S. The above comments are as of the date reviewed and may not reflect all comments from other departments or reviewing agencies. PLO FLOOD ~ CO Q 0 O ~ O ~bebn L. Scott Tucker, Executive Director December 12, 2002 Board of Directors Executive Committee: o Travis Crane Cathy Reynolds . City of Wheat Ridge Chairman City/County of Denver m o Department Of Planning and Development Debra Vickrey a o 7500 West 29th Avenue Chairman Pro-Tern Arapahoe County o U Wheat Ridge CO 80033 Paul Danish ~ , Secretary Z Boulder County Dear Mr. Crane: Gretchen Cerveny m Treasurer City of wheat Ridge = This letter is in response to your request for our comments concerning Case No. WZ-02- Elaine Valente r" 13, Skyline Estates Filing No. 3. We appreciate the opportunity to review this proposal. Member at Large Adams County Z 'a We have reviewed this proposal only as it relates to major drainageways and District Members: Beverly Bradshaw master plans, in this case "Outfall Systems Planning, Columbine Basin" dated December, City of Englewood 1994. We have the following comments to offer: Steve Burkholder e City of Lakewood Noel Busck This proposal recognizes the existence of the above-referenced OSP. The OSP 1 City of Thornton o a . calls for a 35-foot wide right-of-way for a future drainage channel. This Ken Fellman City of Arvada proposal provides that right-of-way. Stephanie Foote City/County of Denver Kathy Green o 2. Note No. 9 on the final plat indicates that Tracts A and B are to be dedicated to City of Aurora m the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District. The District does not accept B. H. Hoffmaster Engineer a dedication of tracts. The tracts should be dedicated to the Citv of Wheat Ridge. Michelle Lawrence Jefferson County With the exception of the tract dedication we have no objection to approval of this Becky Lennon City of Centennial proposal. If you have any questions concerning these comments, please contact me. Kathleen MacKenzie City/County of Denver e W. Mike Maxwell °n Sincerely, Douglas County z Deborah Ortega 0 a City/County of Denver Art Patton 4 Engineer De oo t,- E. _ B Susan Spence Town of Superior Chief, Floodplain Management Program Karen Stuart City/County of Broomfield WGD/mc flood\bi II\wheatridge Consolidated Juchem Ditch and Reservoir Company January 5, 2003 Travis Crane City of Wheat Ridge 7500 W. 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Mr. Crane: The Consolidated Juchem Ditch and Reservoir Co. has no objection to the basic concept of ditch realignment through Skyline Estates Filing No. 3. However, final approval will and profile construction Weisbeck of Kirkham Michael has assured me that prints furnished to your office. be indicated by my sign off on plan drawings being prepared by Scott Consulting Engineers. Mr. Weisbeck of the approved drawings will be Sincerely, Robert B. Dexter President clc CLEAR CREEK VALLEY WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT P.O. Box 156 Arvada, Colorado 80001 November 25, 2002 Mr. Travis Crane Department of Planning and Development 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 REF: Case No. WZ-02-13 Skyline Estates Filling No. 3 @ (Ridge Rd & Nelson St) Dear Mr. Crane: Reference is made to your request regarding proposed development at Skyline Estates Filling No. 3, in the vicinity of Ridge Road and Nelson Street, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. The referenced site is not in the boundary of the Clear Creek Valley Water and Sanitation District. At this date, there is sufficient capacity in the downstream District system of facilities to serve the development. The District will serve the proposed development of this site subject to compliance with all applicable District rules and regulations and subject to inclusion of the property into the District and availability of downstream capacity at the time of actual formal application for sewer connection permits. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office at 303-233-2058. I would be pleased to discuss this matter with you in greater detail at your request. Very t ul . for the District cc: District Office File: C77-0 VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 12101 WEST 52ND AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80033 TELEPHONE 303-424-9661 FAx 303-424-0828 November 24, 2002 City of wheat Ridge 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Attn: Travis Crane Dear Travis: In reference to Case No. MS 02-13, Melody Homes (South of west 54th Place, North of Ridge Road, East of Parfet Street) Valley Water District has reviewed your inquiry and offers the following comments: 1. Valley Water District has adequate capacities to serve the development. Water main lines and fire hydrants will be required to meet AFPD requirements at owner's expense. 2. Valley Water District can provide water service to the development subject,to-valley Water District rules and regulations. Water service tap and line will ,.be.'required for, each separate building structure at owners expense. 3. Valley Water District is supplied water through a master meter distributors contract with the Denver Water Department and must follow Denver Water operating rules and engineering standards. 4. Valley Water District currently has the capacity through their Denver Water contract at the present time to serve the project. Valley Water District in its contract with Denver Water must follow all Denver Water conservation/drought requirements imposed. 5. Additional water main lines and fire hydrants may be needed to serve the property that meet AFPD requirements at owner's expense. 6. Owner will be required to provide necessary easements to the District that meet Denver Water Department requirements. Valley Water District currently has existing easements for water lines currently on the property. 7. Owner of the property, will need_to provide a detailed plat of the project to the Valley Water District. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 303- 424-9661. Sin rely Robert Arnold District Manager Arvada Fire Protection District Division of Fire Prevention November 12, 2002 W. Travis Crane Department of Planning and Development City of Wheat Ridge 7500 W. 29'" Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 RE: Skyline Estates Filing 3 Dear Mr. Crane, We have reviewed the site plan for this project for conformance with the 1997 Uniform Fire Code and have the following comments. 1. Fire protection is provided to this site by Station 2, 12195 W. 52nd Ave. and Station 1, 7900 W. 57h Ave_ 2. All-weather fire dept. access roadways, minimum of 24 feet of unobstructed width, consisting of the first lift of asphalt minimum will need to be provided to within 150 feet of all portions of the building prior to above grade construction. UFC 97 901.3 Amended 3. Street signs temporary or permanent will need to be installed prior to above grade construction. UFC 97 901.4.5. 4. The address numbers for the residences will need to be posted on a temporary basis and permanently affixed to the building in a minimum of 4 inch numbers visible from the street frontage. UFC 97 901.4.4. Amended. 5. Water lines and fire hydrants will need to be installed, operational and capable of providing the minimum required fire flows prior to above grade construction. UFC 97 901.3, 903.2 6. Water lines will need to be looped as required by the Valley Water District and the Denver Water Board. 7. Submit proposed fire hydrant locations for review and comments. Fire hydrant locations will need to be approved by the Division of Fire Prevention and the Valley Water District. UFC 97 903.2. 7300 Kipling Street • Arvada, Colorado 80005-3876 • (303) 463-7655 • Fax (303) 422-5549 Page Two 8. The minimum required fire flow based upon Type V-N construction shall be 1,500 gallons per minute. If shake shingles are to be used for siding, the minimum required fire flow shall be 2,000 gallons per minute. UFC 97 Appendix III-A. Sincerely, Arvada Fire Protection District eeve Slteig-@de~ Deputy Fire Marshal TO Planning and Development FROM Officer L. Gregor Police Department SUBJECT Case No:WZ-02-13. DATE November 7, 2002 I have reviewed the plans for the above listed site. Please consider the following recommendations while developing this site: LANDSCAPE: 1. All mature trees to be trimmed of branches up 6'-8' from the ground to allow for natural visual observation from surrounding areas to the parking lots and building. 2. All shrubs and bushes mature height to not exceed 36". This height reduces the risk of persons hiding. It also allows for natural visual observation onto the property both for the parking lot and building. 3. Plants/ Landscape immediately next to the building should be low-growing ground cover, not to exceed 18" mature height to allow for maximum natural visual observation and eliminate concealment for potential offenders. 4. Ground cover should not include rock material. Rocks can be used to break windows in the buildings and cars. Consider using natural products such as bark or mulch. BUILDINGS: 1. The building finish should be with an anti-graffiti paint or sealant. FENCING: 1. Consider using wrought iron fence instead of cedar. By putting up a wrought iron fencing around the property, you will minimize the chance of vandalism, graffiti and climbing. The initial investment in the fence will be higher, however the long term pay-off by not having to repair the fence will be greater. SITE: 1. During construction, the property should be clearly posted with "No Trespassing" Page 1 of 2 signs. This may help deter trespasses, and allow the Police Department to cite offenders with the crime along with any others offenses that may be committed by trespassers. LIGHTING: 1. Exterior lighting around the buildings and in parking lots should be a minimum of 1.5 candle minimum maintained. This will provide for brightly lit areas that discourages criminal activity due to the illusion /perception of observation and recognition. While my recommendations do not guarantee a crime-free environment, it has been experienced that application of the concept of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) will reduce the opportunity for crime to occur and will enhance the quality of life. Please consider these suggestions while developing this property. Thank you. qr- ~ 'Les Gregor Police Officer Multi-Housing Unit Page 2 of JAN-28-03 TUE 03:00 P" MELODY HOMES, INC. FAX l' 303 466 2368 RIDGE VENTURE, LLC c/o Peregrine Group Development LL4 1580 Lincoln Street, Suite 770 Denver, Colorado 80203 Phil, (303) 832-1377 Fnx (303) 832-1569 Ianuat y 27, 2003 Mr Bill Cassel City Forester City of Wheat Ridge 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Co 30033 P. 01 41 0~rQ~ 23s2~s7 .1V r- Re. Tree removal at abandoned tree nurvery; approximately I7.2 ac Ridge parcel bear Mr. Cassel: I am writing this letter to offer City of Wheatridge an opportunity to remove from this property any trees or shrubs that you believe would benefit the city of Wheatridge and its citizens. As you may know, Melody Homes is currently under contract to purchase the majority of the property comprising the abandoned tree nursery north of Ridge Road and west of Miller Street in the city of Wheatridge. Melody's purchase is contingent on City of Wheatridge's approval of a plan for rezoning the property for a mix of residential and light industrial development. Melody has submitted a proposal for rezoning known as the Skyline III proposal. It is my understanding that you visited the nursery site with two Melody representatives last year and exaurined the remaining trees. Melody representatives reported to me that you found that ttoarly all 0011c trees are in poor condition. Most of the remaining trees are not salvageable. The reason for the poor condition of the remaining trees is that they were planted too close to mature property, Additionally, the trees have not been irrigated or pruned for many years. Most trees on the site have been severely stressed and stunted because of their growing conditions and lack of care. The recent severe drought has been very hard on these already stressed trees. However, I understand that evert though none of the trees on the site could be rated as being of high or even good quality, you believed there are a number of individual trees worth saving. You expressed an interest in salvaging the. better trees and moving them to new homes at city facilities in Wheatridge. I'm happy to help you and the city save those trees which you feel are worth saving. JAN-28-03 TUE 03:01 P" MELODY HOMES, INC. Mr. Bill Cassel City Forester January 27, 2003 Page Two FAH V303 466 2368 P. 02 Whether or not Melody moves ahead with the purchase and development of this property, it is my responsibility to prepare this property for sale and development. In order to do so, I must clean up the site, removing years of trash and dead branches and removing dead and stunted trees. I invite you to inspect the remaining trees and identify those you believe are worth saving. I also Grant you permission to remove all those that would benefit the city of Wheatridge. I only ask that you fill in the boles and remove any discarded trees or branches so that no hazard is created by your activity. Please contact me to let me know when you intend to visit the site and when you plan to remove those trees still worth saving. I would imagine that early spring would be the most appropriate time. I hope this can be done before more trees fall prey to this drought- I look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience Sincerely, RIDGE 'DENTURE LLC ~ Richard A.. rg\~y_~ / \ RAS/elk v hcc: Slevc Wilson DRAFT CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING November 20, 2002 The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chair Coates. Commissioners present: Mary Margaret Coates, Marion Garramone, Bunny Gordon, Jack Rose, Floyd Sasa, Jean Schilling, Susan Seeds. Commissioners Absent: Charles Spielman. Staff present: Joyce Manwaring, Parks Director; Ann Lazzeri, Secretary TTFM 1 - DFTFRMINATTON OF QUORUM Chair Coates declared a quorum present. ITEM 2 - APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM October 16, 2002 - It was moved by Jack Rose and seconded by Floyd Sasa to approve the minutes of October 16, 2002, as presented. The motion passed unanimously. ITEM 3 - TNTRODUCTTON OF GUFSTS - There were no guests. ITEM 4 - REVIEW OF PARK NAMING PROCESS AND POLICY DTSCTISSTON - The Commissioners reviewed the park naming process and policy. Comments were made that there didn't seem to be reason to change the policy. Susan Seeds suggested that staff keep a running list of park naming ideas received by the city. Further, it might be a good idea to have a booth at the Carnation Festival to receive input for possible park names. Also, when consideration for a park name comes up, suggestions could be requested at First Monday meetings. ITEM 5 - 2003 111 1DGET - Joyce Manwaring stated that, since the sales tax issue was defeated, it has become necessary for the city to make several budget cuts. The Parks and Recreation Department will probably be affected in areas such as Performance in the. Parks, flower plantings, parks maintenance and parks construction, street tree plantings as well as other areas. Personnel layoffs will also be proposed as well as an increase in some fees. Suggestions were made that volunteers could help maintain flower beds, etc. Joyce commented that this would be nice but wanted the Commission to be aware she doesn't have the staff to coordinate large-scale volunteer projects. Suggestions were also made that the annual Boards and Commissions Dinner could be a potluck rather than having it catered. Parks & Recreation Commission Meeting November 20, 2002 Page 1 DRAFT Joyce Manwaring presented three items that require comment from the Parks and Recreation Commission. Best Friends Kennel on 44th is planning to expand toward the greenbelt. It was moved by Susan Seeds and seconded by Bunny Gordon that the Parks Commission recommend to City Council that a buffer between the business and the greenbelt be aesthetically pleasing and that there not be an access to the greenbelt through the business. The motion passed unanimously. Minor Subdivision on Harlan between 38th and 41 St. It was moved by Bunny Gordon and seconded by Jack Rose to forward a recommendation to Planning Commission for a contribution of cash in lieu of land dedication for the minor subdivision on Harlan between 38th and 41St Avenues. The motion passed unanimously. Skyline Estates Subdivision. It was moved by Bunny Gordon and seconded by Floyd Sasa to forward a recommendation to Planning Commission for a contribution of cash in lieu of land dedication for the Skyline Estates Subdivision. The motion passed unanimously. Fire Management Plan Review - January Meeting December Meeting - It was moved by Marion Garramone and seconded by Floyd Sasa to cancel the December meeting with the provision that, should something urgent arise, a meeting would be called. The motion passed unanimously. Susan Seeds requested to see a list of plantings planned for the Davis property. Joyce Manwaring will provide this list. Davis property is 80% complete. The apartments will install a wrought iron fence to the west which will open up the view from the apartments as well as from Jay Street. The city contributed some money toward the fence. The city is working with Christopher House nursing home on the north in regard to creating an access into the park. Planting will take place in the spring. Staff is still looking into nontraditional playground equipment. 44th and Kendall design process is now budgeted for 2004. Parks & Recreation Commission Meeting November 20, 2002 Page 2 DRAFT The Open Space Management Plan is now available on CD. CD's were distributed to members of the Commission. Manwaring field is progressing and one field should be playable next year. City Council is no longer requiring monthly reports and Joyce Manwaring asked if the Commission members would still like to receive them. There was a consensus that the Commission would like to continue receiving a monthly report giving highlights of Parks and Recreation Department activity. There are four active property acquisitions: property west of 44th and Kendall; two properties directly south of the Recreation center and the Arvex property. Tabor Lake fence project should occur this year. City Council approved applying for a joint venture grant for trail replacement. Susan Seeds reported that her husband and a neighbor reported seeing a bald eagle at Tabor Lake. A neighbor also asked Susan what happened to the tree on the island in Tabor Lake. Joyce Manwaring will look into this. Several people in Susan's Pilate class asked about the availability of a piece of equipment used in this class called the reformer. Joyce Manwaring stated that she didn't think the city owns the reformer but that it is owned by the Pilate instructors who contract with the city. Joyce will have the fitness instructor write up an explanation regarding this matter. Joyce Manwaring asked Commissioners to encourage people to fill out comment cards if they have a comment about the Recreation Center. R,mny Gordon suggested that the city may consider a trail sign system that she saw when she was in California where trail rules were stenciled in bright green directly on the asphalt trail. Bunny reported that she has been approached by a citizen who would like to have her deceased husband's name carved on a fallen tree in the greenbelt as a memorial. Joyce Manwaring stated that while she appreciated the sentimentality behind this request, the open space management plan must be followed. Joyce will look this up in the management plan and report back. She mentioned that there is a memorial tree planting program; however, there could not be a plaque to accompany the tree. / Parks & Recreation Commission Meeting November 20, 2002 Page 3 DRAFT Mary Marg, ret~_ Coates commented that there was an informative article on dog parks in the Rocky Mountain News. Other members reported seeing a segment regarding dog parks on Channel 9 News. It was moved by Jack Rose and seconded by Bunny Gordon to adjourn the meeting at 8:22 p.m. Parks & Recreation Commission Meeting November 20, 2002 Page 4 Gty of Wheat Wdge Depadment of Public November 7, 2002 Robert Niedringhaus, Planning Manager Facilities Management State Department of Human Services 4130 Julian Way Denver, CO 80236 301866.7295 RE: Acquisition of Ridge Road Right-of-Way Dear Mr. Niedringhaus: The City of Wheat Ridge appreciates the State Department of Human Services willingness to consider dedicationbyway of Quit Claim Deed and Right-of-Way Agreement for portions of Ridge Road between Parfet Street and Miller Street. Please find attached acopyof the description letter and associated deed history as prepared by Melody Homes, Inc. As you are aware, Melody Homes, Inc. is preparing a submittal for development of property in both the City ofArvada and the City of Wheat Ridge. It is for this reason that they have approached you and the City of Wheat Ridge in an attempt to secure the Right-of-Way along the north side of Ridge Road for the City of Wheat Ridge. Please review the attached information in consideration ofthe dedication ofthe Ridge Road Right-of-Way. The following information has been attached for your review: 1. A description of the Chain of Events as prepared by the Arvada City Surveyor for that portion of Ridge Road (Parcel A) that is adjacent to Skyline Filing #2 (dated 9/30/02). A copy of the deeds from 1943. 2. Copies of the deeds relating to the Skyline Filing #3 Ridge Road Right-of-Way (identified as Parcel B). 3. A survey map of the Ridge Road Right-of-Way to help visualize Parcels A-D. Parcel A - Skyline Filing #2 (State Department of Human Services) Ridge Road Right-of-Way. Parcel B - Skyline Filing #3 (Consolidated Nursery/ Martin Hart) Ridge Road Right-of-Way. Parcel C & D - Ridge Home (State Department of Human Services) Ridge Road Right-of-Way. 4. Copy ofthe contract from the State Land Board to the Department ofHuman Services to sell landthatincludesParcels C&D as shown on the land survey. Legal Description as attached and Patents include the Ridge Road Right-of-Way. State Department of Human Services Parcels A, C & D As you have previously discussed with Melody Homes, the Right-of-Way along the north side of Ridge Road was retained by the Department of histitutions (now known as the Department of Human Services) as a result of transfers of title by deed and a land transfer between state agencies (the State Land Board and the Department of Human Services). Therefore, we are respectfully requestingthatyou dedicate to the City of Wheat Ridge the Ridge Road Right-of-Way identified as Parcels A, C & D by the Kirkham- Michael survey. Ifyou have any questions, please contact Dave Brossman at 303.235.2864 or ScottBemhart from Melody Homes at 303:466.1831 x1077. Greg Knudsen, M.P.A. Interim Public Works Director David F. Brossman, P.L.S. City Surveyor 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 303-235-2846 DATE: 6 November 2002 The City of 4 The Wheat Ridge Department of Planning & Development has received a request for a rezoning final development plan and subdivision at the property described below. Your response to the following questions and any comments you may have regarding this proposal would be appreciated by Monday December 16, 2002. No response from you by this date will constitute having no objections or concerns regarding this proposal. CASE NO.: WZ-02-13 LOCATION: APN 39-161-00-001 (south of West 54'h Place, north of Ridge Road, east of Parfet Street) REQUESTED ACTION: Rezone property from Agriculture-One (A-1) to Planned Residential Development (PRD) and Planned Industrial Development (PID). Subdivide into thirty-seven residential lots. Included with this request is a final development plan. PURPOSE: Create a thirty-seven lot residential subdivision, with a three-acre parcel of Industrial land. APPROXIMATE AREA: 17.67 Acres Please describe your ability to service the property, while considering the following: • The adequacy of public facilities or services provided by your agency to serve this development. • The availability of service lines to the development. • Will any service lines need to be extended to accommodate development? • The adequacy of capacities to serve the development. • Servicing of this proposed development subject to your rules and regulations. • Specific easements that are needed for this proposal. • Any comments that would affect approval of this request by your agency. Please reply to: Travis Crane (303.235.2849) Department of Planning and Development Fax: 303-235-2857 Completed by: (Name, Agency/Department, Date) DISTRIBUTION: 1 yater District Sanitation District Fire District Adjacent City Jefferson County Planning Department Xc&Energy Qwest Communications Colorado Department of Transportation Denver Regional Council of Governments JeffCo Health Department JeffCo Schools JeffCo Commissioners A"G& broadband Urban Drainage and Flood Control District Regional Transportation District Wheat Ridge Post Office Wheat Ridge Police Department Wfieat Ridge Public Works U17heat Ridge Parks,&"Recreation Department Wheat Ridge Forestry Division` Wheat Ridge Building Division Wheat Ridge Economic Development "The Carnation City" O ~ ~ 'fir T w x'ro o m ~ o M p a x a CD a rn o a. K ago • N M ~o o n ~ o N N c a a h rn N' o' 5 cro as ~ o rn ~ a0 N ~n 5'~0 as o CD o c c 0 n 0 ~-11 c C s 0 a ^a n N J ~C 0 ~n 0 CD LA -~n J N c N a N' c 0 ~n a 0 a n w 0 ro I C c w o' 0 0 a m C o' a a+ rn C z 0 ro v° 0 a J 0 II N a It n rn N .O N a ro A a" rn 0 ~n °o 0 a. E OQ m F o' a a+ 0 F C O C A A ,a c ti c O c >r 0 co a •I• 0 rn N II J J C w c m o' 0 0 -n a a ro ro w N N a o_ C R: C a: m a Q' O N. N rn C c b b N r 0 T N W ;-h A W a 0 II J r 0 C m N O a N rn m rna a < w c C CD O M 0 0 N O O 0 v n N l.i b a 0. d c s y er A T KIRKHAM MICHAEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS November 1, 2002 Mr. Travis Crane City of Wheat Ridge 7500 W. 29°i Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 RE: Skyline Estates, Filing No. 3 KM Job No. M-020312 Dear Travis: CITY OF QHEAT R'DGE 3°.5E: P1 Cilu P181-0-0 HCiM^=: Tlyi= Y!'.EIR`I lO.(:T i4UCl AM,N P11'" 'Oi'HNU RE11BURSEME`dT 30iiAO 7t,.'ETI`i 'O'rdlilOi RE-MB13RSEMEtv"s ~1tdF E'R1'MEd1 REt RIVE-D RPiiitihiT f~K Tfi I,L Enclosed for review, you will find the following items for the above-referenced project: 1. Application 2. Check in the amount of $7275 (application fee) 3. Legal Description 4. Outline Development Plan (18 copies) 5. Final Development Plan (18 copies) 6. Architectural Elevations and Sample Architecture (18 copies) 7. Overlot Grading and Erosion Control Plans (2 copies) 8. Drainage Report (2 copies) 9. Storm Sewer Plans (2 copies) 10. Roadway Plans (2 copies) 11. Traffic Impact Study (2 copies) 12. Juchem Irrigation System Plans (2 copies) 13. Noise Survey by Engineering Dynamics Incorporated 14. Robert Messana Mineral Interest Letter 15. Neighborhood Addresses' 16. Pre-Application Meeting Notes 17. Neighborhood Meeting Notes/List Construction Documents for the future widening of Ridge Road have not been included with this submittal, due to the preliminary nature of the proposed cross-section guidelines and specifications. The developer is proposing to escrow funds for the proposed improvements, which will be made at a future date. 5600 South Quebec Street • Suite 200 D • Greenwood Village, CO 80111 • (303) 694-2300 • FAX (303) 694-2822 a~ November 1, 2002 Mr. Travis Crane Page 2 of 2 Thank you for your time in review and approval of this project. Please contact the at (303) 694-2300 if you have questions or require additional information. Sincerely, KIRKHAM MICHAEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS Steven P. Kocher, P.E. Land Development Manager cc: Scott Bernhart, Melody Homes H:\0203121CORR\LE7TER I0-16-02ODP-FDP-SUBMIITCAL.DOC 7500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215 Wheat Telephone 303/235-2846 Ridge FAX 303/235-2857 June 26, 2002 B. Scott Bernhart Community Planner Melody Homes, Inc. Dear Scott: The fees for your land use application total $7,275. Please see breakdown of the fees below: Rezonine (Planned Development District Application Fee $ 750 Plus $15/acre (18 acres) $ 270 Publication/Public Notice Fee; $ 300 Final Development Plan Application Fee $250/acre (18 acres) $4,500 Publication/Public Notice Fee waived* Subdivision Plat Application Fee $ 300 Plus $15/lot for single family residential (37 lots) $ 555 Plus $100/acre for non-single family residential (6 acres) $ 600 Publication/Public Notice Fee waived* Amount due $7,275 *Publication/public notice fees are waived if published concurrently with rezoning application. Payment is due upon application. A copy of our fee schedule is available at our office or on our wet site at www.ci.wheatridge.co.us. Please feel free to contact me at 303-235-2846 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Kathy Field Administrative Asst. RIDGE VENTURE, LLC c/o Peregrine Group Development LLC 1580 Lincoln Street, Suite 770 Denver, Colorado 80203 Phn. (303) 832-1377 Fax (303) 832-1569 November 5, 2002 Ms. Mary Austin Planner City of Wheat Ridge Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Dear Mary: Melody Homes is authorized to seek approval for Development Plans, Final Development Plan, Final Plat, Development Agreement and any other related land planning approval for Skyline Estates Filing #3. My authorization as the property manager and optionee on behalf of the State of Colorado Board of Land Commissioners is secured through a Property Improvement and Disposition Agreement that was signed in July, 1996 and its current term runs through July, 2005- It is for this reason that this letter should be sufficient evidence for Melody Homes to proceed through Planning Commission and City Council for Skyline Estates Filing 43. Should you need any additional information or clarification regarding ownership, please contact me at Peregrine Group Development, LLC (303-832-1377) or Scott Bernhart, Melody Homes, Inc. (303-466-1831 x1077). The above and foregoing Affidavit as subscribed before me this 5a' day of November, A.D., 2rk02 personally By: Richard ~ Peregrine rburg up evelopme o ary P lic My Commission Expires. 7 o y3 2 O0 S rno.. ,."IN ~3 4""Y Hqmel~ W. a D.R. HORTON COMPANY Mary Austin, AICP City of Wheat Ridge Planner 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 RE: Skyline Estates Filing # 3 (Rezoning to PD-R/PD-I, Final Development Plan, Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Final Plat Application) Dear Mary: The application for Rezoning, Final Development Plan and Final Plat is attached for City staff review and referral to the Planning Commission and City Council. Skyline Filing #3 is planned as an extension of the highly successful and existing Melody Homes Skyline neighborhood located to the north of this site. The second filing is proposed directly west of this site and is located in the City of Arvada. Skyline Filing 43 is located between 54`h Avenue and Ridge Road, west of Miller Street and the Ridge Home State Human Services property. Melody proposes 37 single-family home sites and a 3 acre industrial zoned parcel. The average lot size will be approximately 9,000 square feet with the smallest home sites being 66' x 120' or 7,920 square feet. Melody proposes to generally follow the guidelines of the City of Wheat Ridge Rl-B zone district and specific industrial regulations. The 3 acre industrial parcel is proposed adjacent to Ridge Road as an extension of the 4 acre area planned as industrial within Arvada to the west of this site. It is important to note that the proposed industrial zoning is directly related to the provisions of the Ridge Home Urban Renewal Plan as adopted by the City of Arvada in 1996. The Ridge Home Plan included the Skyline Filing #3 property even though it is located in the City Wheat Ridge. Arvada staff, Planning Commission and City Council has made it clear to Melody Homes that the Ridge Home Plan should be utilized in land use planning by both Arvada and Wheat Ridge. The surrounding area has experienced a change in conditions with regard to current residential land uses and potential limited industrial uses. It is for this reason that Melody Homes has included an Industrial area in the application. When considering the size of the home sites and the adjoining single family uses, the proposed uses would be compatible with the surrounding area. This site was used at one time several years ago as part of the Consolidated Nursery operations, and as such has retained a number of lower quality trees. Melody Homes met with the City of Wheat Ridge Forester, Bill Cassell on site to determine if any trees could be salvaged. It was determined that a few of the trees could be re-located for future uses and that the City may be interested in using some of the trees. Melody supports the use and relocation of the few remaining viable trees by the City of Wheat Ridge, as may be 11031 Sheridan Boulevard • Westminster, CO 80020 • 303.466.1831 • Fax 303.466.1838 9 www.meIodyhomesinc.com recommended. Many of the trees are standing, but no longer living and could potentially pose a local fire danger. Melody Homes anticipates building the same series of homes proposed in Filing #2 (Arvada). While this series of homes is similar in size to those currently being constructed in Skyline Filing #1 (north of West 54th Avenue), our offering has been improved with the addition of numerous garage recessed and side load models. It is our belief that the series of home proposed in Skyline #3 includes some of our best homes and as always will be of superior quality. These homes will range in size from 1600square feet to nearly 2700 square feet. We anticipate the sales price will range from $275,000 to nearly $350,000. Currently there are 11 home models and 22 elevations anticipated to be offered within Skyline Filing #3. Please take time to review the attached fact sheet regarding Skyline Filing #3 for additional statistics about our homes and the City of Wheat Ridge Codes as they would apply to this neighborhood. As always if you have any questions please call meat 303- 466-1831 x1077 or on my cell phone at 303-944-0151. S'• Icer y, Scott Bernhart, AICP Melody Homes Community Planner JUI. GF 2002 1:53PM 'AP LFSERJET 3200 Robert P. Messana, P.C. Attorney at Law 315 W. Oak St., Ste. 704 Telephone (970) 482-6551 Fort Collins, CO 80521 Facsimile (970) 482-1107 Email address: Robert P. Messana robert®messanalaw.com Web address: www.=ssanalaw.coni July 3, 2002 Melody Homes, Inc. Via Facsimile (303)466-1838 Mr. Scott Bernhardt and U.S. Mail 11031 Sneridan Blvd. Westminster, Colorado 80020 RE: Mineral Title Examination Township 3 South, I Range 69 Went Oh P.M. Section 16: Part of the SW/4NE/4 identified as Skyline Estates Filing No. 3; Jefferson County, Colorado Dear Mr. Bernhart: Pursuant to your request under cover of facsimile dated June 20, 2002, but for the account of Melody Homes, Inc., this office has examined title to the captioned lands in order to provide the following information: Ownership of the mineral estate (including leasehold estate), as defined by C.R.S. § 24-65.5- 102, underlying the captioned lands. Subject to the limitations set forth below, ownership of the mineral and leasehold estates appears as follows: 1. Mineral Estate: The State of Colorado for the use and benefit of the Department of Institutions c/o The Colorado"State Land Boatd 1313 Sherman Street, Room 620 Denver, Colorado 80203 p.2 JUL CZ 2002 1:53PM 'iP LFSERJET 3200 P•3 Melody Homes, Inc. Mr. Scott Bernhardt July 3, 2002 Page 2 of 2 If. Leasehold Estate: None included in the materials examined. The above named party should be notified pursuant to C.R. S. § 24-65.5-103, 30 days prior to the initial public hearing on your development application. Please note the term "application for development" is broadly defined to include a preliminary or final plat for a subdivision, a planned unit development, or any other similar land use designation used by a local government. The term includes application for zoning, rezoning, general development plans, and special use permits where such application is in anticipation of new surface development. The term does not include building permit applications. The information provided above is based upon an examination of the records maintained by the Office of the Colorado State Land Board, Transnation Title Company, Denver, Colorado, and the records of the Jefferson County Clerk and Recorder, from inception of title to June 19; 2002, at 7:45 a. m., and is certified to such date. This opinion is conditioned upon the accuracy and completeness of the said materials and the undersigned has not undertaken to verify the same; thus, any errors contained in or omissions from the materials examined will necessarily be reflected herein. In addition to the above, the records of the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission and of the Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology were reviewed (via the internet). Based on this review there is neither evidence of mining operations nor of a producing oil and/or gas well on the captioned lands: This letter is neither intended to, nor does it constitute an opinion as to the quality ofMelody Home's title in or to the captioned lands. Insomuch as it may acquire any interest in the mineral estate, Melody Homes is encouraged to retain by exception and reservation, in any subsequent conveyance, all right, title and interest in and to the same. Please note, addresses are based upon the most current and reliable sources available to this office, including various county records and internet records; and are deemed reasonably reliable. Thank you for allowing this office the opportunity to assist you in this matter. Should you have any questions regarding the above, please feel free to contact us. Yours truly, R ROBER MESSANA P C obert P. Messana Attorney at Law F:WCa Wllody Hamel, Irc`S 8 Title (Skyline 3)1LW Opvdl d SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 3 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ALL THAT PART OF THE WEST '/z OF THE SOUTHWEST Y4 OF THE NORTHEAST %4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO, LYING NORTH OF THE COUNTY ROAD KNOWN AS RIDGE ROAD, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST'/4 OF SAID SECTION 16, THENCE NORTH 00°13'11" WEST, ON AND ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST %4, A DISTANCE OF 71.25 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF RIDGE ROAD, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE NORTH 00°13'11" WEST ON AND ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST %4, A DISTANCE OF 1246.20 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST %4 OF THE NORTHEAST Y4; THENCE SOUTH 89°35'34" SECONDS EAST, ON AND ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST''/4 OF THE NORTHEAST %4, A DISTANCE OF 665.06 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID WEST %2 OF THE SOUTHWEST %4 OF THE NORTHEAST'/4; THENCE SOUTH 00°12'59" EAST, ON AND ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST %2 OF THE SOUTHWEST'/4 OF THE NORTHEAST %4, A DISTANCE OF 1068.47 FEET TO A POINT OF THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID RIDGE ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 74°38'30" WEST, ON AND ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 688.90 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 17.67 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. 0 engineering c dynamics incorporated 1 May 2002 Mr. Scott Bernhart Melody Homes, Inc. 11031 Sheridan Blvd. Westminster, Colorado 80020 RE: Train Noise Assessment, Skyline Estates Filings #2 and #3 ED] Job # C-3132 Dear Mr. Barnhart: FAX PAGE 1 OF 6 303-466-1838 Voice: 303-466-1831 Engineering Dynamics, Inc. has completed a railway noise impact assessment for the proposed Skyline Estates subdivision Filings No. 2 and 3, that is located North of Ridge Road, South of 54' Ave. and West of Kipling St. in Arvada and Wheat Ridge, Colorado. This analysis is performed in order to determine the impact of vehicle traffic on Ridge Rd. and train traffic from the BNSF railway line that runs adjacent to Ridge Rd; this is a spur line that runs to the Coors facility in Golden, Colorado. The distances from Ridge Rd. and the BNSF Railway to the closest residential lot (Lot 1 in Block 4) are approximately 450' and 500', respectively. 1.0 1.1 1.1 Background and Input Data BNSF Rail Line Data The average number of trains that run along this line is 1 per day. Other data that is required and was used for input to the HUD noise prediction procedure is shown in Table 1.1. Table 1.1: HUD Rail Line Noise Prediction Procedure Input Data Distance in feet from the NAL to the railway track 525' Number of trains per day 1 Number of engines per train 1 Number of cars per train 10 Fraction of nighttime operations, in this case BNSF did not know the percentage of nighttime operations. Therefore, per the procedure the fraction is 0.15 0 Average train speed 20 Welded or Bolted track Bolted Whistles required Yes Ridge Rd. Vehicle Traffic Data The average number of trains that run along this line is 1 per day. Other data that is required and was used for input to the HUD noise prediction procedure is shown in Table 1.2. Table 1.2: HUD Roadway Noise Prediction Procedure Input Data Distance in feet from roadway 450' Distance to nearest STOP sign <1200' Average vehicle speed 35 ADT for cars and medium trucks 8000 ADT for heavy trucks 200 Fraction of nighttime operations, 15% 15% Year of traffic projection 2020 3925 south kalamath street • englewood, colorado 80110 9 303.761.4367 • Fax 303.761.4379 *engineering JWV& 1 dynamics incorporated Mr. Bernhart Skyline Estates Filings No. 2 and 3 1 May 2002 Page 2 of 6 2.0 Procedure Results The combined cars, medium truck and heavy truck DNL was calculated using the HUD Roadway Noise Prediction procedure outlined in'The Noise Guidebook', U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Document Number HUD-953-CPD(1) September 1991, Worksheet C, Chapter 5, pages 6 to 13, 28 and 29. The results of Worksheet D show that the Roadway DNL is 55, at Lot 1 in Block 4. DNL levels at all other lots will be less than on this lot. See attached copies of Worksheet C, two sheets. The combined locomotive and railcar DNL was calculated using the HUD Railway Noise Prediction procedure outlined in 'The Noise Guidebook', U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Document Number HUD-953-CPD(1) September 1991, Worksheet D, Chapter 5, pages 14 to 17, 30 to 31. The results of Worksheet D show that the Railway DNL is 53, at Lot 1 in Block 4. DNL levels at all other lots will be less than on this lot. See attached copies of Worksheet D, two sheets. The combined DNL, from rail line and roadway noise at Lot 1 in Block 4, is 57. In accordance with the Site Acceptability Standards given in the Chapter 2 page 13 of'The Noise Guidebook', sites with a DNL less than 65 are Acceptable for development. 3.0 Conclusions Roadway and railway noise over the entire Skyline Estates Filings Number 2 and 3 was calculated using HUD procedures. The results of these procedures show a combined DNL of 57, which gives the entire project a Normally Acceptable rating. If you have any questions, please contact me at our Englewood office. Sincerely, ENGINEERING DYNAMICS, INC. 4It'~ 0 WO~1.4- Stuart D. McGregor Senior Acoustical Engineer 3925 south kalamath street • englewood, colorado 80110 9 303.761.4367 9 Fax 303.761.4379 Worksheet C Page 1 Hoke Assessment Guidelines Roadway Noise List all major roads within 1000 feet of the site: ~tdge ~dgd 3. 4. Necessary Information 1. Distance in feet from the NAL to the edge of the road a. nearest lane It. farthest lane c. average (effective distance) 2. Distance to stop sign 3. Road gradient in percent 4. Average speed in mph a. Automobiles b. heavy trucks - uphill c. heavy trucks - downhill 5. 24 hour average number of automobiles and medium trucks in both directions (ADT) a. automobiles b. medium trucks c. effective ADT (a + (10xb)) 6.24 hour average number of heavy trucks a. uphill b. downhill c. total 7. Fraction of nighttime traffic (10 p.m. to 7 a.m.) 8. Traffic projected for what year? 28 Road 1 Road 2 Road 3 Road 4 wWHS y Sa G~ZOO G 35 3~ 3S 6000 7_00 !?aaka 00 ioa 7- V O Zzaza 76 Worksheet C Roadway Noise Page 2 Noise Assessment fiuktslinss Adjustments for Automobile Traffic 15 16 9 10 11 12 13 14 glop Average and Speed Night- Time Auto ADT Adjusted AT (Workqhan i) Barrier Attenuati Partial on DNL Table 3 Table 4 Table 5 (line 5c) 06`40 X ~.oa X Oao _ 277-0 qg _ O = qg Road No.1 X Road No. 2 X X x Road No. 3 X X X d N 4 X X X o. Roa Adjustments for Heavy Truck Traffic 25 26 27 is 19 17 A Tr Average Truck 20 22 21 and9o 23 Night- Time 24 Adjusted Truck DNL (Work- Barrier Partial DNL Gradient Speed ADT -7- Table 6 Table 7 Table 8 Table 5 ADT chart 2) Attn. t X0.91 X 10L, = S f Uphill /dL 1.8 X X "0 = 292 Road No. 1 Add - 0.31 X100 = $1 Downhill X X _ - Uphill - X Add X = - - Road No. 2 - Downhill - X - _ X X = - - Uphill _ Add X X Road No. 3 - Downhill -x - _ Uphill -X-X- = X Add X = - - Road No. 4 - Downhill --X - _ Combined Automobile & Heavy Truck DNL Total DNL for Lt, Cf s q F.t Road No. 2 Road No. 3 Road No. 4 All Roads Road No. i Date 30 ri O Z 29 77 Worksheet D Page 1 Noise Assessment Guidelines Railway Noise List All Railways within 3000 feet of the site: 1. g AjSF 2. 3. Necessary Information: Railway No. t Railway No.2 Railway No. 3 1. Distance in feet from the NAL to the railway track: 5-00 2. Number of trains in 24 hours: a. diesel b. electrified 0 3. Fraction of operations occudng at night 0,1 S- (10 p.m. - 7 a.m.): 4. Number of diesel locomotives per train: 5. Number of rail cars per train: j o a. diesel trains b. electrified trains 0 6. Average train speed: c O Q 7. Is track welded or bolted? ~~1 S 8. Are whistles or horns required for grade crossings? 30 78 Wbrksheet D Page 2 Noise Assassmant Guidallms Railway Noise Adjustments for Diesel Locomotives 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 96 17 No. of Average Locomotives Speed Night- Home time No. of Trains Ad. No. K DNL Barrier Partial DNL 2 Table 9 (enter 10) Table 5 (line 2a) ris. of Wodcchart 3 Attn. 1 So "6 10 X I = 7.5 z- 1 Railway No. 1 Z X X X % X X = - _ Railway No. 2 % % X X Railway No. 3 % - Adjustments for Railway Cara or Rapid Transit Trains 18 Number 19 Aversge 20 21 Bolted Night- ti 22 No. of Trains (Line 23 Ad)- No. 24 25 26 DNL Partial Work- Barrier of cars Speed Table 10 me Rails (enter 4) Table 5 2a or 2b) of Opns. char 4 Attn. DNL 50 111/50 q _ o, 3 S '15 Railway No. 1 . % - _ X Railway No. 2 X X X X = - _ Railway No. 3 X X X % ° - _ Combined Locomotive and Rahway Car DNL Railway No. 1 Z. Railway No. 2 Railway No. 3 Total DNLforall Railways SZ" 31 79 Scott Bernhart, 09:21 AM 6/25/2002, Skyline Filing 3 Fees Page 1 of 1 X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 6.0.1 Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 10:21:37 -0600 From: "Scott Bernhart" <SBernhart@melodyhomesinc.com> To: <marya@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: Skyline Filing 3 Fees Mary, Did you have a chance to verify our fees for the ODP/FDP/FP, rezoning to a PRD/PID on Skyline Filing 3? Here is what my best guess is: 17.67 total acres 12.35 residential acres 37 home sites/lots Planned Development Fee- $1015.05 application fee+ $300 publication Final Development Plan Fee- $3,087.50 application fee + $300 publication Using 12.35 acres for FDP on residential only Mary is this right? $3,087.5 V $250 per acre Can you verify? Final Plat Fee- $855 application fee + $300 publication Do you want one lump sum or individual checks for each application type, or a briefcase full of 10's and 20's? Do we pay three different $300 publication fees or just one time...? $4,957.55 for Application Fees $900 for publication $5,857.55- Total Application Cost $158.31 per home site Thanks for all your help last Friday and Wednesday. ~TT`7 i-C WHE4f nl'GE 'r i9g 4r_ FM CtlG B. Scott Bernhart, AICP ` , C% Community Planner r,Ei rODY HOMES _p;r. Melody Homes, Inc. AD.R. Horton Company LT-PAT np; , E'r' i'1 U7 h'Ei~tT G=r hND,,I (v . i i i7y_ A J Printed for Mary Austin <marya@ci.wheatridge.co.us> 6/26/2002 of wee,yr LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION {oF wHenrP _c Planning and Development Department V o 7500 West 29' Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Phone (303) 235-2846 Cet ORP~~ (Please print or type all information) .~r/11 .i~~ 3o3-Y66'/83/ Applicant ne(0JY HoineS,Tnc. Address//03/S4e110/an vd. Phone x /07? City htJeS1~%NSfer StateCo/ordJa Zip SDd2o-3258 Fax363-YL6-/838 363-83Z- 1377 Owner R i efd rd Se~ie/ ~urij Address 1580Lin eo%SfYf '"40 4 Phone X /I City _1~eK ve- r State('o/ordde Zip So2o3 Fax.303-83Z-1565 µ HClddy 363-%66-/83/ Contact_ Scott $ern4drt f/orweS Address //d,3/-~'JC~"/~d4. Phone X/o'77 City State Co%+"ddo Zip Seb20-32:5S Fax3o3 t/38-769Y (The. person listed as contact will be contacted to answer questions regarding this application, provide additional information when necessary, post public hearing signs, and will receive a copy of the staff report prior to Public Hearing.) See C' l Location of request (address): Befweem R ~dx Rod J aM J StO Ave EaSf of Od k Sf, f{ ~i:yn c«r» f Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request.) Application submittal requirements on reverse side XChange of zone or zone conditions (n) ❑ Special Use Permit ❑ Consolidation Plat ❑ Subdivision: Minor (5 lots or less) ❑ Flood Plain Special Exception XSubdivision: Major (More than 5 lots) ❑ Interpretation of Code ❑ Preliminary XFinal ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Right of Way Vacation ❑ Planned Building Group ❑ Temporary Use, Building, Sign ❑ Site Development Plan approval ❑ Variance/Waiver (from Section ) ❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment XOther: F(H -d I Cleve/oo. e,,+ ;P/a, i S.fri c Detailed description of request: e e n; vt -f'0 ~let" h ve /016A"near Fndl Aeye 40 P"u 4 1_/dM /Hd / JG diV Si0 d t Required information: g21- 171 Assessors Parcel Number: 9- /6 00 -001 SMeLdmd gnt Size of Lot (acres or square footage): k 7.67 _ Current Zoning: A- 1 Proposed Zoning: PD - R d,,/ PQ - Z Current Use: Vdedv f Proposed Use: eF.*%4ResWe4,d/-_TMdfrl-,'al I certify that the information and a ibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, I am acting with th wledge and consent of those persons listed above, without whose consent the requested action cannot lawfully be accomplis Applicant other than o rs must submit power-of-attorney from the owner which approved of this action on his behalf. Signature of Appl' Su cC tome this _1eday of e,#& JO 20O Z 9,9 N S O yary Public commission expires ' • COLo t Date received l 0 ~ Fee $ e A9Receipt No. J/ Case No. 0~- Comp Plan Desig. Zoning Quarter Section Mapit' Related Case No. Pre-App Mtg. Date Case Manager ~i s__! Case No.: App: Last Name: App: First N ame: Owns r: Last Name: Owner: First Nam e: App Ack re ss: City, State Z ip: App: Pho me: Owner Address: City/St ate/Zip: Owner Phone: Project Address: Street Name : City/State, Zip: Case Disposition: Project Planner: File Lo cation: Notes: Follow- Up: 02 Quarter Section Map N Melody Homes, Inc. Related Cases: c/o Scott Bernhart ' Case Histor y: chierburg_ Richard 11031 Sheridan Blvd. Review Body: Westminster, CO 80020 303-066-1831 APN: 1680 Lincoln St. Ste. 770 2nd Revie w Body: Denver, CO 80203 2nd Review Date 303-832-1377 Decision-making Body 10286 Appro val/Denial Date: Ridge Road heat Ridge, CO 80033 Reso/Ordinance No.: of E16 Rezone from A-1 to PRD with outline & final development plan & plat PC 39-161-00.001 CC CC 11.111, Co ions of Approval: F. District: IV ustin Active Date Rec eived: 11/112002 L.. Pre-App Date: B. Scott Barnhart, AICP Community Planner Melody Homes Inc. a D.R. HORTON COMPANY 11031 Sheridan Blvd., Ste.A • Westminster, CO 800203258 303-466-1831 x1077 • Fax 303466-1838 Direct Fax 303-438-7694 sbernhart@melodyhomesinc.com www.meIodyhomesinc.com SRO "0004 k, W, t a D.R. HORTON COMPANY Mary Austin, AICP City of Wheat Ridge Planner 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 RE: Skyline Estates Filing # 3 (Rezoning to PD-R/PD-I, Final Development Plan, Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Final Plat Application) Dear Mary: The application for Rezoning, Final Development Plan and Final Plat is attached for City staff review and referral to the Planning Commission and City Council. Skyline Filing #3 is planned as an extension of the highly successful and existing Melody Homes Skyline neighborhood located to the north of this site. The second filing is proposed directly west of this site and is located in the City of Arvada. Skyline Filing #3 is located between 54th Avenue and Ridge Road, west of Miller Street and the Ridge Home State Human Services property. Melody proposes 37 single-family home sites and a 3 acre industrial zoned parcel. The average lot size will be approximately 9,000 square feet with the smallest home sites being 66' x 120' or 7,920 square feet. Melody proposes to generally follow the guidelines of the City of Wheat Ridge Rl-B zone district and specific industrial regulations. The 3 acre industrial parcel is proposed adjacent to Ridge Road as an extension of the 4 acre area planned as industrial within Arvada to the west of this site. It is important to note that the proposed industrial zoning is directly related to the provisions of the Ridge Home Urban Renewal Plan as adopted by the City of Arvada in 1996. The Ridge Home Plan included the Skyline Filing #3 property even though it is located in the City Wheat Ridge. Arvada staff, Planning Commission and City Council has made it clear to Melody Homes that the Ridge Home Plan should be utilized in land use planning by both Arvada and Wheat Ridge. The surrounding area has experienced a change in conditions with regard to current residential land uses and potential limited industrial uses. It is for this reason that Melody Homes has included an Industrial area in the application. When considering the size of the home sites and the adjoining single family uses, the proposed uses would be compatible with the surrounding area. This site was used at one time several years ago as part of the Consolidated Nursery operations, and as such has retained a number of lower quality trees. Melody Homes met with the City of Wheat Ridge Forester, Bill Cassell on site to determine if any trees could be salvaged. It was determined that a few of the trees could be re-located for future uses and that the City may be interested in using some of the trees. Melody supports the use and relocation of the few remaining viable trees by the City of Wheat Ridge, as may be 11031 Sheridan Boulevard 9 Westminster, CO 80020 • 303.466.1831 • Fax 303.466.1838 • www.melodyhomesinc.com recommended. Many of the trees are standing, but no longer living and could potentially pose a local fire danger. Melody Homes anticipates building the same series of homes proposed in Filing 42 (Arvada). While this series of homes is similar in size to those currently being constructed in Skyline Filing #1 (north of West 54t' Avenue), our offering has been improved with the addition of numerous garage recessed and side load models. It is our belief that the series of home proposed in Skyline #3 includes some of our best homes and as always will be of superior quality. These homes will range in size from 1600square feet to nearly 2700 square feet. We anticipate the sales price will range from $275,000 to nearly $350,000. Currently there are 11 home models and 22 elevations anticipated to be offered within Skyline Filing #3. Please take time to review the attached fact sheet regarding Skyline Filing #3 for additional statistics about our homes and the City of Wheat Ridge Codes as they would apply to this neighborhood. As always if you have any questions please call me at 303- 466-1831 x1077 or on my cell phone at 303-944-0151. " I., Y> se? Bernhart, AICP Melody Homes Community Planner Skyline Filing #3 - Melody Homes October 17, 2002 Character of Development: Planned Development Section 26-301(C) Melody Homes is proposing to build homes within Skyline Estates Filing #3 in a compatible manner to the existing pattern of development in the immediate area. The 37 home sites are adjacent to the 70 proposed lots in Skyline Filing #2 (Arvada). The industrial portion of Skyline Filing 93 is planned as an extension of the existing industrial within Skyline Filing #2. The current Master Plan for the area is the Ridge Home Property Urban Renewal Plan (1999) as adopted by Arvada with input from the City of Wheat Ridge. Skyline Filing 92 and #3 meet the specific intent of the Ridge Home plan. It is for this reason that the proposed Skyline Filing #3 land use plan closely reflects the Ridge Home plan and includes a request to amend the current City of Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan for this area. 2. Melody Homes is proposing 11 models and 22 distinct elevations for construction at Skyline Filing #3. These homes include a variety of styles, including, ranch, two story and tri-level homes. Five homes are garage recessed and one is a side load, making for a dynamic mix of architecture. Homes will be located on lots that require a 30 foot front setback in accordance with City guidelines, providing a unique neighborhood that is distinct from Skyline Filing #2 (18.5' front setback). The streetscape will provide an open and estate like atmosphere, with regard to the distance of the homes from the flow line of the streets (37'). 3. The design of Skyline Filing #3 is complementary to the efficient use of land and facilitates more economic arrangement of circulation systems and utilities. 4. This site was used several years ago as a tree nursery and as such, does have many remaining trees. Melody Homes met on site with Bill Cassell, the City of Wheat Ridge Forester to discuss what should be done in the future with any remaining recoverable trees. Mr. Cassell's initial review indicated that the site did have some trees that could be used by Wheat Ridge or Melody Homes. Some trees could be relocated while the dead, dying and poor quality trees, which represent the vast majority of trees on the site would be removed. Melody supports relocation and use of the viable trees as identified by Melody and the City of Wheat Ridge. 5. Several useable spaces are proposed to be landscaped and available to the neighborhood as open spaces. The home sites in Skyline Filing #3 will be approximately 5% larger on average than the home sites in Skyline Filing #2. The industrial area will be zoned for less intensive uses that are not likely to create conflicts with the adjoining neighborhood area. Buffer areas have been included between the industrial zoned area and residential home sites. 6. The wide variety of homes proposed to be constructed on this site will provide for coordinated styles through the use of limiting confronting lot frontages and similar style of homes. No two elevations will be built across from one another and no two same models will be built adjacent to one another within Skyline Filing #3. 7. Interior circulation is well designed and provides for easy access and controlled intersections safe overall design. 8. Melody will install adequate public facilities in accordance with a submitted utility plan sufficient to serve the entire neighborhood. 9. Conformance with the adopted City of Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan is proposed through a plan amendment. This amendment would reflect the newer provisions of the Ridge Home Property Urban Renewal Plan (1999) and the changes to the surrounding neighborhood with regard to residential development and industrial development patterns. 10. Handicapped access will be provided through a series of ramps and at grade sidewalk intersections, including mid block ramps to increase access to handicapped citizens. Other provisions of the ADA will be included as needed. 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Telephone 303/ 235-2868 FAX 303/235-2857 September 19, 2002 Mr. Mike Elms Community Development Director City of Arvada 8101 Ralston Road Arvada, Colorado 80001-8101 Re: Skyline Estates Filing #2 & #3 Dear Mr. Elms, The City of Wheat Ridge The City of Wheat Ridge would like the City of Arvada Planning Commission to consider the following request for the hearing for Skyline Estates Filing #2: ❑ The City of Wheat Ridge will request that Melody Homes construct the public improvements along Ridge Road at the time of construction of the single family residences. The public improvements shall include: curb, gutter, detached walk, bike lanes and the open channel required by the Columbine Basin Study. City staff has concluded that there is sufficient impact by the proposed development warranting these improvements at this time. The developer has proposed that these improvements be tied to the development of the industrial parcels. There are potential problems with allowing the developer to defer these improvements until such time. Two of these concerns are that there is no time frame as to when these lots will be developed, and the lots may be developed over different time periods. The first concern is that lots may not be developed for several years while the impact from the new neighborhoods is an immediate impact. Lack of public improvements will limit the accessibility surrounding the new subdivisions. The second item mentioned refers to the low probability of both industrial parcels developing at the same time. Should one parcel develop immediately and the other sits vacant for several years, the problem again refers to back to the lack of continuity for the Ridge Road improvements for the new subdivisions and neighborhoods. The City of Wheat Ridge would like to thank you and staff for your time and consideration in this matter. Sincerely, Greg Knudson Interim Public Works Director 7500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Wheat Telephone 303/ 235-2868 Ridge FAX 303/235-2857 September 14, 2002 Mr. Mike Elms Community Development Director City of Arvada 8101 Ralston Road Arvada, Colorado 8000'1-8101 Re: Skyline Estates Filing #2 & #3 Dear Mr. Elms, The City of Wheat Ridge would like the City of Arvada Planning Commission to consider the following request for the hearing for Skyline Estates Filing #2: ❑ The City of Wheat Ridge will request that Melody Homes construct the public improvements along the north side of Ridge Road at the time of construction of the single family residences. The public improvements shall include: curb, gutter, detached walk, bike lanes and the open channel' required by the Columbine Basin Study. City staff has concluded that there is sufficient impact by the proposed development warranting these improvements at this time. The developer has proposed that these improvements be tied to the development of the industrial parcels. There are two concerns with allowing the developer to defer these improvements until such time. Specifically that there is no established deadline as to when these lots will be developed, and the lots may be developed over different time periods. Regarding the first concern, the lots may not be developed for several years while the impact from the new neighborhoods is an immediate impact. Lack of public improvements will limit the accessibility surrounding the new subdivisions. Regarding the second concern is the low probability of both industrial parcels developing at the same time. Should one parcel develop immediately and the other sits vacant for several years, the problem again refers back to the lack of continuity for the Ridge Road improvements. Th ity of Wheat Ridge would like to thank you and staff for your time and consideration in this matter. S' c ely, Greg Knudson, M.P.A. Interim Public Works Director KIRKHAM MICHAEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS 56005uth Quebec St t.SWte]AOD•Gre woa VO ge,C080111 Project: Date: Designed: Checked: 1yf111' see UR~c Bi2ossr*?~J /YjrrS'E I~,~tt I-5 rv\ck- W eA cl--~ Sco`~ ~erN~jdr'~ ~V !p ~o~ba2 1-~o it,A2I ~tir~r~ivv ~/v~ ~ Gocv~ Puduc LJore.es 303. Z 35. zg~ y ~irz P•~• 3=3•z~s•z868 C©W& P'Opoly-5 ~3 z~s-2894 C-&-Az 'P.•i, 3°3' Z3S- 28Lo 04 E-Pl~l ~ 7540+7 c~ ~f r 9 -S, -2 T - ww-Y. rr C i ~y of Pwv"o- 7 )-o Aq - l I'AO /-NeS 383-166 i,~/o?) W t, ~~.-wwtw~ 303- 'IS- CA-fYOF \\4e52T FIME; FiU 303 -235- aaG2. -3a S- Z31- - 29lo(n Job number: Sheet of 1 1 N M r 00 06 fib r' RESOLUTION NO. 23-2000 Series of 2000 TITLE: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE AND THE CITY OFARVADA FORTHE PURPOSE OF STREET ASPHALT OVERLAY. WHEREAS, Section 14.2 of the Home Rule Charter of the City of Wheat Ridge provides express authority to enter into intergovernmental agreements providing for cooperative efforts between governments; and WHEREAS, Wheat Ridge is currently conducting a street overlay project which includes Miller Street from W. 49th Avenue to Ridge Road; and WHEREAS, Wheat Ridge and Arvada have discussed jointly overlaying existing asphalt pavement from W. 49'h Avenue to Ridge Road along Miller Street, hereinafter called the Project; and WHEREAS, the Parties desire to cooperate to the fullest extent possible to ensure that the construction project is accomplished according to the mutual desires of each party for the best interest of their respective citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that: Sec. 1 The Mayor of the City of Wheat Ridge is hereby authorized to execute the Intergovernmental Agreement attached hereto with the City of Arvada to reconstruct the shared street known as Miller Street between W. 49th Avenue and Ridge Road. DONE AND RESOLVED THIS a-2, a Day of MaL4 2000. Cerveny, Attest: Wanda Sang, City AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ARVADA AND THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE FOR REIMBURSEMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS TO MILLER STREET This Agreement, dated this 22nd day of May , 2000, is by and between the City of Arvada, a Colorado municipal corporation (hereinafter "Arvada") and the City of Wheat Ridge, a Colorado municipal corporation (hereinafter "Wheat Ridge"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS,, Section 29-1-203, C.R.S., as amended, permits and encourages local governments to make the most efficient and effective use of their powers and responsibilities by cooperating and contracting with other local governments in order to provide any lawfully authorized function, service, or facility; and WHEREAS, Wheat Ridge is currently overlaying the existing bituminous pavement on its portion of Miller Street from West 49 h to Ridge Road and is willing to include Arvada's portion of Miller Street from West 49`h to Ridge Road (hereafter the "Project"), as shown on Exhibit "A" of this Agreement; and WHEREAS, Arvada has appropriated funds from its 2000 budget sufficient to reimburse Wheat Ridge for the work to be done on Arvada's portion of Miller Street, at the costs reflected on Exhibit "B" of this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Parties desire cooperate to the fullest extent possible to ensure that the construction of the Project is accomplished according to the mutual desires of each party for the best interests of their respective citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above and the mutual covenants made herein, the Parties hereby agree as follows: 1.0 SCOPE OF WORK. 1.1 Wheat Ridge shall provide the design, contractor, construction inspection, and contract administration for the Project, and to this end, has awarded a construction contract to Asphalt Specialties Company, Inc. (hereafter "Contractor"), for construction of the Proj ect. 1.2 Wheat Ridge will coordinate construction activities between Contractor and Arvada, and will give Arvada at least one (1) week's advance notice prior to commencement of construction within Arvada. 1.3 Contractor shall provide performance and payment bonds in the amount of one hundred percent (100%) of the value of the contract. 1.4 Arvada may inspect the Project, but shall communicate to Contractor through Wheat Ridge. 2.0 TERM. The term of this Agreement shall be from commencement of construction of the Project, which shall be approximately June 2000, and termination shall be upon the completion of the Project and payment therefore, or no later than December 31, 2000, whichever shall first occur. 3.0 COMPENSATION AND PAYMENT. 3.1 Arvada shall allocate funds from the 2000 budget in an amount not to exceed $15,000, as reflected in Exhibit "B," attached hereto and incorporated herein, to reimburse Wheat Ridge for Arvada's portion of the Project. 3.2 Compensation shall be paid by Arvada to Wheat Ridge within thirty (30) days of receipt of invoice from Wheat Ridge, upon acceptance of the work and final inspection by Arvada. 4.0 TERMS AND CONDITIONS. 4.1 Wheat Ridge and Arvada hereby agree that, upon execution of this Agreement and commencement of the Project, they will cooperate with each other to the fullest extent in the scheduling of the work, supervision, and review, when applicable, to ensure the successful completion of the Project. 4.2 Upon completion of the Project, the Parties shall own the improvements .located within their city boundaries. 4.3 Each Party shall be responsible for its own negligent acts. Wheat Ridge shall be solely responsible for the design, construction, inspection, and administration of the Project, and shall be solely responsible for any liability resulting from or relating to the design, construction, inspection, and administration of the Project. 4.4 Each Party shall reimburse the other Party for any costs, expenses, or legal fees that either Party may incur for any liability resulting from the negligent acts of the other Party. 6.0 WARRANTY. The Parties.agree that any contracts awarded for the performance of the Project shall be warranted by the selected Contractor for a one (1) year period, and that surety be provided for enforcement of this warranty. 7.0 INSURANCE. 7.1 During the term of this Agreement, both Parties shall maintain property and general liability insurance policies, in the amounts required by the Colorado Governmental 2 Immunity Act (Section 24-10-101, C.R.S., et sec insuring them from claims arising from the Project. 7.2 Both Wheat Ridge and Arvada shall require that all contractors, subcontractors, and independent contractors employed by both Parties for the Project maintain property, general liability, and statutory worker's compensation insurance in such amounts as to insure Wheat Ridge and Arvada to the statutory limits of their liability. 8.0 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS OR ACTION. The Parties agree to execute any additional documents or take any additional action that is necessary to carry out this Agreement. 9.0 ASSIGNMENT. This Agreement shall not be assigned by either Party without the prior written consent of the other Party. 10.0 FORCE MAJEURE. Any delays in or failure of performance by any Party of his or its obligations under this Agreement shall be excused if such delays or failure are a result of acts of God, fires, floods, strikes, labor disputes, accidents, regulations or orders of civil or military authorities, shortages of labor or materials, or other causes, similar or dissimilar, which are beyond the control and such Party. 11.0 BINDING EFFECT. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of, and be binding upon, the Parties, their respective legal representatives, successors, heirs, and assigns; provided, however, that nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to permit the assignment of this Agreement except as otherwise expressly authorized herein. 12.0 EXHIBITS. All exhibits referred to in this Agreement are, by reference, incorporated herein for all purposes. 13.0 NOTICES. Any notice required or permitted by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been sufficiently given for all purposes if sent by certified mail or registered mail, postage and fees prepaid, at the address set forth on the signature page below, or at such other address as has been previously furished in writing, to the other Party or Parties. Such notice shall be deemed to have been given when deposited in the United States mail. 14.0 PARAGRAPH CAPTIONS. The captions of the paragraphs are set forth only for the convenience and reference of the Parties and are not intended in any way to define, limit or describe the scope or intent of this Agreement. 15.0 INTEGRATION AND AMENDMENT. This Agreement represents the entire agreement between the Parties and there are no oral or collateral agreements or understandings. This Agreement may be amended only by an instrument in writing signed by the Parties. If any other provision of this Agreement is held invalid or unenforceable, no other provision shall be affected by such holding, and all of the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 16.0 DEFAULT. Time is of the essence. If any payment or any other condition, obligation, or duty is not timely made, tendered or performed by either Party, then this Agreement, at the option of the Party who is not in default, may be terminated by the nondefaulting Party, in which case, the nondefaulting Party may recover such damages as may be proper. If the nondefaulting Party elects to treat this Agreement as being in full force and effect, the nondefaulting Party shall have the right to an action for specific performance or damage or both. 17.0 WAIVER OF BREACH. A waiver by any Party to this Agreement of the breach of any term or provision of this Agreement shall not operate or be construed as a waiver of any subsequent breach by either Party. 18.0 ATTORNEY'S FEES. If any Party breaches this Agreement, the breaching Party shall pay all of the prevailing Party's reasonable attorneys' fees and costs in enforcing this Agreement. 19.0 GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Colorado. Venue for any action arising under this Agreement or for the enforcement of this Agreement shall be in the appropriate court for Jefferson or Adams County, Colorado. 20.0 GOVERNMENTAL IMMUNITIES. 20.1 The Parties hereto understand and agree that liability for claims and injuries to persons or property arising out of the acts or omissions of either Party is controlled and limited by the Colorado Constitution and the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act (Section 24-10-101, C.R.S., et m q-). 20.2 Arvada and Wheat Ridge agree that in the event any claim or suit is brought against either or both Parties by any third Party as a result of the operation of this Agreement, that both Parties will cooperate with each other, and with the insuring entities of both Parties, in defending such claim or suit. 21.0 COUNTERPART EXECUTION. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 4 CITY OF ARVADA, a Colorado municipal corporation Ken Fellman, Mayor 8101 Ralston Road P.O. Box 8101 Arvada, CO 80001-8101 ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM City Attorney CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, A Colorado W. 29~' Avenue it Ridge, CO 80215 AP D AS O/ORM• C City ttorney 5 7500 West 29' Avenue City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215 Wheat Ridge Telephone (303) 235-2846 Fax(303)235-2857 Neighborhood Meeting Summary Date: June 19, 2002 City Staff Present: Mary Austin, Planner Michael Garcia, Development Review Engineer 4 Location of Meeting: Wheat Ridge Municipal Building, 2"' floor conference room Property Address: 10285 Ridge Road Property Owner: Sate of Colorado Property Owner Present? No Applicant: Melody Homes Applicant Present? Yes Existing Zoning: A-1 Comp Plan Designation: AER (1 unit/acre) Existing use/site conditions: Vacant land Applicants proposal: To rezone the property from A-1 to PRD and PID and receive approval of an Outline Development Plan, Final Development Plan and Final Plat. The applicant intends to develop the site with 37 single family residential homes and an industrial area along Ridge Road. Issues discussed: Questions were posed regarding plans for the industrial area. Melody Homes commented that the industrial area is planned to be compatible with the industrial area in the City of Arvada along Ridge Road. It is not planned to be an intensive manufacturing area. The industrial area will p\nost likely not be a part of the homeowners association. Maintenance of Ridge Road: The road is entirely within the City of Wheat Ridge and will be maintained by Wheat Ridge. Questions were raised about the keeping of large animals on the residential lots. Melody Homes responded that the covenants will likely prohibit large animals and they will not be listed as a permitted use. Traffic circulation: A traffic impact study will be required to be submitted by Melody Homes and approved by the City. i (D 00 V cn W N s O t S n r LAJ 0 ~ o N p z 0 W W a W Lv ~ v a N _c W W 3 O M r m n D N m N z z m S O cD z X m m N O _ C z z E m W 0 Z m O a SU z cn -L Q. -<< 0 O m o c 0 O ~ N v m m N m ® -i z (O N V of W N 91 a ~ 1 w ~ a U) N w o a Lj z rn m cU) rn ® G) 2 X T c-E z M W O z m r z D i 2' v 2 O m ~M 0 3 O -I m e m m o -a z Z O N I N o• C C O Q r_ m 3 M O Z n Center ~ 9al 0z 1oz n, ie. II P w I 16 0 019 n~.xf9, ti n.er 02 asses 03 U' 2 TRACT 5 12 TRACT T 018 .w a E We 1 54th I t i I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I ~ I I ~ I I 51 51 51 I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I I STATE OF COLORADO I STATE OF COLORADO ~ STATE OF COLORADO I I I 1492 - 38 1417- 505 F I I vl I T.I 1 _ I 1e yi 10t 39-164-01- 001 39-164-01- 002 °q26` PT OF COORS PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT NO I AMD. 2 y R I d 9 e R R 9 8 C. n vs In 4T oDZ ~ f Adjoining 39- 164 1 STAN II Iry F 'O o 4 i - Adjoi nin g 39- 161 C enser 0. e ]90~ G.0 5 . 30 W' 5~+° 51 .]00 61 47 ua¢ 39- 161- 00-002 I- A UNNUMBERED LOT I vz 33 0 01 002 p03 CONTAINER PT OF COORS PLANNED INDUST RIAL N m SYSTEMS m - N N MINOR DEVELOPMENT FL G.1 AMEN DMENT 2 SUB. - SUB. 3 0 I- e r w w ¢ MIN. ~ 106= zD 004 se o Cr, m BB9°C319"W 69 C G ® T° a CITY Of Wr1ER PoGGE 2163- 138 g R O ]O x. Oi' Fl ]0 'a La K INOU 6TRIAU PARK AMENDED. W. 50th z-e I-A Avenue Im aaz n' Is1» z9 ]o 3BG x~ -o Q O 3 O 4 3 02 O Q 001 K O2 ®0 B OOe L & K IN DU STRIAL PA K IBB ]fi 196 3]' w O 2 AMENDMENT 6 SUB. sOB ne J J 004 3 ODV ~ ~ 003 e1 ® 002 z1s - R. C0 i zaB s 6 L RppO ASSOCIATED WAREHOU SE SU& ,I.~ 52 1, 161 ed ' - - 227 30 39 - 012 e 93 023 m = Bz5 - s1 xwr 00 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :3190 Corp Parcel :042786. Site :5185 Miller St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :05/31/1978 Mail :2141 NW 25Th Ave Portland Or 97210 Price :$537,000 Use :3112 Ind,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm:l YB :1976 Pool: B1dgSF :25,218 Ac:2.31 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Lic Investments Inc Parcel :085141 Site :5000 Oak St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :06/23/1986 Mail :4030 Vincennes Rd Indianapolis In 46268 Price Use :3112 Ind,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm:3 YB :1970 Pool: B1dgSF :156,720 Ac:8.85 : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Coors Brewing Company Parcel :136211 Site :10619 W 50Th Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :12/31/1990 Mail :PO Box 4030 Golden Co 80401 Price Use :3112 Ind,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm:ll YB :1968 Pool: B1dgSF :428,859 Ac:27.05 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner Owner :Lic Investments Inc Parcel :176621 Site :5 St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :10/17/1986 Mail :4030 Vincenn Rd Indianapolis In 46268 Price Use :3111 Vacant,Ind rial Phone Bedrm: Bath: To YB : Pool: B1dgSF : Ac:.98 Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations 9.. : ® . .a -A (ZED ® 3913t9DD1] ® )a 4 a PT OF SKYLINE ESTATE S Fl-G. NO. I nTiOX e ~ ~ . ee a~re a nPVno♦ CEMEin9Y P950CI o _ ( 4c I (go 1 a \ 153-a80 B o R . x y4 ' ^ 0y m® i O 00 \ lot - )s ]s¢5 sx 9a9ga5 I 114 t14 os-.n ~¢rsa oot (SID ATAII OF © 51 51 ~+n O ® IF, _ '^+[I 111 ~b. ,6511 ~ ~ uv° ® ® 4'•r A OEM ~ ~ j ¢ w¢¢~ O ~ .C e DFAF cE) ` n i O TIFFT 1 STATE OF COLORADO PI r 1°59, I Ls ¢ r Eon III F s,.,E wu[ ° ,xelxix0 s[xms 6\ ¢ 1 1 1 ~ ..rw m. 51 51 51 51 III O STATE OF COLORADO 11 STATE OF COLORADO STATE OF COLORADO [oLOxaoo sia.E LE i1 1192- 38 rl 4 1917-505 b~ E 3 P^°e 0 z P) ° ° ° P- P- 9. 31 aQo1 4 5`s .d STATE OF LOLOR ADO A - n FF OF "0"' 11- Adjoining 39-164 Center J MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) - : Owner :3190 Corp Parcel :042786 Site :5185 Miller St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :05/31/1978 Mail :2141 NW 25Th Ave Portland Or 97210 Price :$537,000 Use :3112 Ind,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm:l YB:1 976 Pool: B1dgSF :25,218 Ac: 2.31 : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :State Of Colorado Parcel :203938 Site :Ridge Property Xfered :12/17/1986 Mail :3550 W Oxford Ave Denver Co 80236 Price :$44 Use :9129 Exempt,State,Land Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: BldgSF : Ac: 18.75 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :State Of Colorado Parcel :204630 Site :Ridge Property Xfered :12/17/1986 Mail :3550 W Oxford Ave Denver Co 80236 Price :$44 Use :9129 Exempt,State,Land Phone Bedrm: Bath: Tot Rm: YB: Pool: BldgSF : Ac: 6.36 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Jacksonville Beach Development Co Parcel :433374 Site :*No Site Address* Xfered :12/10/1999 Mail :8101 E Prentice Ave #605 Englewood Cc 80111 Price :$4,690,000 Use :1111 Vacant,Residential Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: BldgSF : Ac: 16.02 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :City Of Arvada Parcel :433375 Site :*No Site Address* Xfered :12/09/1999 Mail :8101 Ralston Rd Arvada Cc 80002 Price Use :9149 Exempt,Political Sub,Land Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: BldgSF : Ac: .64 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Bromley 132 Llc Parcel :435888 site :*No Site Address* Xfered :09/07/2000 Mail :PO Box 247 Eastlake Cc 80614 Price Use :1111 Vacant,Residential Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: BldgSF : Ac: .18 Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Erickson Rodney R Etal Parcel :426914 Site :11256 W Crestline Or Littleton 80127 Xfered :02/12/2002 Mail :10976 W 55Th Ln Arvada Co 80002 Price :$302,130 Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1 999 Pool: B1dgSF :1,908 Ac:.17 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Swendroski Michael Etal Parcel :000000 Site :*No Site Address* Arvada 80002 Xfered :01/22/2002 Mail :5640 Oak Ct Arvada Cc 80002 Price :$299,780 Full Use Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF : Ac: • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Albert Edward Parcel :000000 Site :*No Site Address* Arvada 80002 Xfered :01/28/2002 Mail :5621 Oak Ct Arvada Co 80002 Price :$323,680 Full Use Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF : Ac: • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Robertson Adam/Lori A Parcel :000000 Site :*No Site Address* Arvada 80002 Xfered :02/01/2002 Mail :5620 Oak Ct Arvada Co 80002 Price :$304,160 Full Use Phone Bedrm: Bath: Tot Rm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF : Ac: * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Koellner Kristina Parcel :000000 Site :*No Site Address* Arvada 80002 Xfered :02/01/2002 Mail :10836 W 55Th Ln Arvada Co 80002 Price :$287,150 Full Use Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF : Ac: * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Mathew Abraham K Etal Parcel :000000 Site :*No Site Address* Arvada 80002 Xfered :02/01/2002 Mail :5570 Oak Ct Arvada Cc 80002 Price :$303,520 Full Use Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF : Ac: * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Saft Louise G Parcel :000000 Site :*No Site Address* Arvada 80002 Xfered :02/05/2002 Mail :10936 W 55Th Ln Arvada Cc 80002 Price :$262,880 Full Use Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF : Ac: * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Theisen Grace A Etal Parcel :000000 Site :*No Site Address* Arvada 80002 Xfered :02/05/2002 Mail :5641 Oak Ct Arvada Cc 80002 Price :$363,170 Full Use Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF : Ac: * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Saft Janet I Parcel :000000 Site :*No Site Address* Arvada 80002 Xfered :02/28/2002 Mail :10956 W 55Th Ln Arvada Co 80002 Price :$285,840 Full Use Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF : Ac: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Capra Kenneth J Etal Parcel :000000 Site :*No Site Address* Arvada 80002 Xfered :02/28/2002 Mail :5550 Oak Ct Arvada Cc 80002 Price :$316,190 Full Use Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF : Ac: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Deboer Erik Parcel :000000 Site :*No Site Address* Arvada 80002 Xfered :03/04/2002 Mail :10876 W 55Th Ln Arvada Co 80002 Price :$289,240 Full Use Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF : Ac: Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Campbell Bryan E Etal Parcel :000000 Site :*No Site Address* Arvada 80002 Xfered :03/04/2002 Mail :10856 W 55Th Ln Arvada Cc 80002 Price :$297,950 Full Use Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF : Ac: * - MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Namba Todd K Etal Parcel :000000 Site :*No Site Address* Arvada 80002 Xfered :03/04/2002 Mail :10796 W 55Th Ln Arvada Cc 80002 Price :$305,550 Full Use - Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF : Ac: ; MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) ; Owner :Aguilar Mark T/Sally R Parcel :000000 Site :*No Site Address* Arvada 80002 Xfered :03/04/2002 Mail :10916 W 55Th Ln Arvada Cc 80002 Price :$317,980 Full Use Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF : Ac: * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Ward John R Etal Parcel :000000 Site :*No Site Address* Arvada 80002 Xfered :03/19/2002 Mail :5580 Oak Ct Arvada Cc 80002 Price :$307,640 Full Use Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF : Ac: * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Beck Melissa A Parcel :000000 Site :*No Site Address* Arvada 80002 Xfered :03/20/2002 Mail :5531 Oak Ct Arvada Cc 80002 Price :$320,340 Full Use Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF : Ac: : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Bohm Peter/Tveta - Parcel :000000 Site :*No Site Address* Arvada 80002 Xfered :03/21/2002 Mail :10935 W 54Th Ln Arvada Cc 80002 Price :$275,580 Full Use Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF : Ac: : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • - Owner :Nelson Brian D Etal Parcel :000000 Site :*No Site Address* Arvada 80002 Xfered :03/25/2002 Mail :5560 Oak Ct Arvada Cc 80002 Price :$284,770 Full Use - Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF : Ac: * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Griffin Amie Etal Parcel :000000 Site :*No Site Address* Arvada 80002 Xfered :03/25/2002 Mail :10955 W 54Th Ln Arvada Cc 80002 Price :$326,650 Full Use Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF : Ac: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Brown Simon T Etal Parcel :000000 Site :*No Site Address* Arvada 80002 Xfered :03/25/2002 Mail :10975 W 54Th Ln Arvada Cc 80002 Price :$315,020 Full Use Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF : Ac: - • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) ; Owner :Cordova John T/Jeanne M Parcel :000000 Site :*No Site Address* Arvada 80002 Xfered :03/26/2002 Mail :10855 W 54Th Ln Arvada Cc 80002 Price :$293,020 Full Use Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotP= YB: Pool: B1dgSF : Ac: • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Hall Derek D Etal Parcel :000000 Site :*No Site Address* Arvada 80002 Xfered :03/27/2002 Mail :5540 Oak Ct Arvada Cc 80002 Price :$298,970 Full Use Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF : Ac: Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations 3 z -T - -----I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I ARVADA I I OE 16 OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WHEAT RIDGE COLORADO PARCEULOT BOUNDARY (DESIGINATES OWNERSHIP) NE 16 WATER FEATURE * DENOTES MULTIPLE ADDRESSES 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN (APPROXIMATE LOCATION) O 100 200 300 9W P,e c DEPARTMEN70F MAP ADOPTED: June 15, 1994 o0 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Last Revision: September 10, 2001 City of Wheat Ridge ~aY y Notice of Neighborhood Input Meeting Melody Homes is Proposing A Rezoning & Subdivision Plat The Date and Time of the Meeting: Wednesday June 19`x', 2002 at 6PM The Location of This Meeting is: Skyline Estates Models Office at 10897 West 55Th Lane (see attached map) Northeast Corner of Parfet Street and West 55`h Lane The purpose for this proposal is: Request to Rezone from Agricultural A-1 to Residential Zoning (either PRD or Rl-B) with 35+ single-family homes and a 1.5+- acre industrial parcel (adjacent to Ridge Road) The City of Wheat Ridge has adopted a requirement that prior to any application for rezoning of property, a minor and major subdivision and for special use permits an applicant must notify all residents and property owners within 600 feet and invite them to a neighborhood input meeting. The purpose of this meeting is to allow the applicant to present the proposal to the neighborhood and to give the neighborhood a forum to express their concerns, issues and desires. A staff planner will attend the meeting to discuss City policies and regulations and the process involved. The planner in attendance will remain impartial regarding the viability of the project. Keep in mind that this is not a public hearing. Although a synopsis of the meeting will be entered as testimony, it is the public hearings in front of the Planning Commission and City Council where decisions are rendered. If you want input in the decision making process, it is imperative that you attend the public hearings. The kinds of concerns residents normally have include the following: • Is the proposal compatible with surrounding land uses and zoning? • Are there adequate utilities and services in place or proposed to serve the project? • What is the impact on our streets? • How will this proposal affect my property? • Where will the storm drainage go? • How will the project be designed to enhance rather than detract from the neighborhood? • What specific changes can be made in the proposal to make it more acceptable to me? If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at: (303) 235-2846. If you are unable to attend the meeting, you may mail comments or concerns to: City of Wheat Ridge Yo CA V, 41,5 _;C 7 • 7 ~e~b~jLe t Planning Department 7500 West 29`h Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215 I a Cl 8 v v O _ 5 `C v Q (p 0 0 3 - Tl 77 5 v W 4 . O 'n O' ~ - Q n z; 1 8 S o a S S 0 1 ~ o 8 N f/) 5 n ~ T 8 MILLER STREET F s I - vZ• t 3 ~ n . a D +n o n v { ~ I e 0 5 ~ L cti a Z O L s S T O L O a o L a V e O 0 T. m ~ ~ O U 1 4 v ® J J s MILLER S TREET 8 Y ✓ 8 5 / g 8 s e C) 0 E q N ti h% n r N m~ m] N in in r I n ;M 11 L1C~~~ Melody Homes Skyline Filing 3 Fact Sheet City of Wheat Ridge Neighborhood Meeting June 19, 2002 6PM Total Site- 17.67 acres (2.09du/acre-gross) Single Family- 12.35 acres (69%) 37 home sites (2.99du/acre-net I/det) Industrial- 3.14 acres (17%) Open Space- 1.76 acres + 2.18 acre existing detention (22%) Right-of-Way- 4.00 acres (22%) Average Lot Size- 9,000sf Gross Density (w/out ind.)- 2.55 du/acre Proposed Zone District- ? RIC R1B S,OOOsf--min. lot size 30' front setback 5' side setback 10' rear setback 25% lot landscaped 40% lot coverage 7,500sf-min. lot size 30' front setback 5' side setback (15' between homes) 10' rear setback 25% lot landscaped 40% lot coverage Public Works 4' walk width (attached) 50' ROW for local streets Parks/Open Space Dedication of Parks- 43homes X 0.016acre = 0.69 acre dedicated (4% of site) Cash in Lieu- Value of 0.69 acres post platting Encroachments- Porches/Decks/Patio- 8' front encroachment 1/3 side encroachment Architectural Features- 30" encroachment JUN-07-02 FRI 12;57 PM MELODY HOMES, INC. FAX NO. 303 466 2368 P. 01/03 0 MEWDYHOMES. Facsimile Cover Sheet To_ I!!tar 4 _ Com~ an - 'Phone: Fax: 3c53 - 2 ~5 - 2S S7 From: -scot` Phone: Fax: Date: Pages including this cover oaae: it yuu & not rt M&Wise. we W1 466-1831 1erkh Inc. - 2- X00 2 Comments: _ /V wo TM NorIt~ oolMailed I, n aldtrJ,ed b Nk FAX ft*SSW k Wm&ed 0* kr yw QWWkWdW We of Ve b ar Mgt ina ,Mrer, WWW. brdeywig ybyr rrmed YwrMbNabyMl5 yr(N ~coeXe**bw In n,p Dk+ee " ra bvWdMibn«mpykq ellhe oamMridfpnkV~MbMed IfywhMyMmm#mdM rnmr+icMeon in mw, 1 nalyy us by b.&OW,e ud ohm the daeumpp b v<by mi. 71o is yw. JUN-07-02 FRI 12:57 PM MELODY HOMES, INC FAX NO. 303 466 2368 P. 02/03 City of Wheat Ridge Notice of Neighborhood Input Meeting Melody llontcs is Proposing A Rezoning, Outline Plan (Subdivision) and Amendment to the City of Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan The Datc and Time of the Meeting: Wednesday June 19'h, 2002 at 6PM The Location of This Meeting is: Skyline Estates Models Office at 10897 West 55`h Lane (see attached map) Northeast Comer of Parfet Street and West 55"h Lane The purpose for this proposal is: Request to allow Residential Zoning (Planned Unit Development) with 35-F single-family homes and a 1.5+- acre industrial parcel (adjacent to Ridge Road) The City of Wheat Ridge has adopted a requirement that prior to any application for rezoning of property, a minor and major subdivision and for special use permits an applicant must noti fy all residents and property owners within 600 feet and invite them to a neighborhood input meeting. The purpose of this meeting is to allow the applicant to present the proposal to the neighborhood and to give the neighborhood a forum to express their concerns, issues and desires. A staff planner will attend the meeting to discuss City policies and regulations and the process involved. The planner in attendance will remain impartial regarding the viability of the project. Keep in mind that this is not a public hearing. Although a synopsis of the meeting will be entered as testimony, it is the public hearings in front of the Planning Commission and City Council where decisions are rendered. If you want input in the decision making process, it is imperative that you attend the public hearings. The kinds of concerns residents normally have include the following: • Is the proposal compatible with surrounding land uses and zoning? • Are there adequate utilities and services in place or proposed to serve the project? • What is the impact on our streets? • How will this proposal affect my property? • Where will the storm drainage go? • How will the project be designed to enhance rather than detract from the neighborhood? • What specific changes can be made in the proposal to make it more acceptable to me? If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at: (303) 235-2846. If you are unable to attend the meeting, you may mail comments or concems to: City of Wheat Ridge Planning Department 7500 West 29`h Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215 JUN-07-02 FRI 12;58 PM MELODY HOMES, INC. FAX NO, 303 466 2368 P. 03/03 ~~ll D n m k' 0 G C7 C7 w A JUN-05-02 WED 02:31 PM MELODY HOMES, INC. FAX NO. 303 466 2368 P. 02 Suite 5, 2002 Dear Neighbor: Zbt A neighborhood meeting is scheduled for hme 2002, 6PM, at the existing Skyline 1 model home office Inc. located at 10897 West 55'" I,ane (NE comer of Parfet and West 55" Lane). Melody Homes, will. The submitting a request to the City of Wheat lodge to create 38-40 home sites as part of Skyline Filing 3. Property is located smith of the existing Skyline neighborhood between Oak Suet and Nelson Street and between West 54°i Avenue and Ridge Road (17 acres). Proposed homes will be similar in size and price to the existing Skyline neighborhood to the north. T7tis neighborhood meeting notice is required as a courtesy to the public, Prior to submittal of the plan to the City of wheat Ridge. if you have questions regarding this matter, please contact either Melody Homes or the city of Wheat Kidgc at: B. Scott Aernihart, ATCP Melody 110mcs, Inc. 11031 Sheridan Blvd. Westminster, Colorado 50202 (303) 466-1831 x1077 Mary Austin City of Wheat Ridge Planner 7500 West 2e Avenue Wbeat Ridge, Colorado 80215 (303) 235-2852 Kind Regards, B. ScottBemhart, AICP community planner Melody Homes, Inc. Attached: Model Directions/Map General Site Plan JUN-05-02 WED 02:31 PM MELODY HOMES, INC. FAX NO. 303 466 2368 P. 01 0 MELODY HOMES. lnl-~ww~IwL 1,.. lOl iwi. I~iN Facsimile Cover Sheet co-pan C',~ o~ iJEaed~ ~<<f e Y'/~.h~,er_ Phone: Fax: From: cottzt e,el;QC 'f Com an : _ Melody Homes, Inc._ Phone: (303)466-1831 _ _ Fax: 303 466-1838 Hate: - CJ 2 Pages including this cover a e: I!youwnwnewwneenydtksaml plgm.Pleasecad"eehce Men la tINw11e5. ouwxwisc, we wN es5ylne you hne nsehsd the aa„artussbn satidfaRwdy. Comments: J u N ~ t °i ~ The.d=o n*W"NedhaaftandbeaFAXnautepeisHaledonly1wOwowAft"areleeI„aA=ksj Ivrtled tociyerlt«e^YwY°III'edI ii loedd *gMbeeeamed n,etOkr I Yaa hftmefylWKed V%Wif eu Mic !etched aft daaaneed[n s .7eplew, 6geen1 P,morO0ft of ft wlmmston b pWdAd. Q you Mw mo&Ad eus canwr" catim in awe. Plate roa ft w Mladel* by I@WO w and rat" the who &CuMftda b m Ey nw0. Thank you. JUN-05-02 WED 02:31 PM MELODY HOMES, INC, yam- ~,~x e s e>s ;o£~ b N a p < Lca4, x f~feus f3mrd Y Y~ t " 7 A ~ V i t C \ Y+L~ µW ^d ~ y ~L ~ te } k y~ ~ • ~ S ~ ~i t ~ \ ~ s p„fit ~ ~d ep e 'I S6pt ~ eLY Q _ , 3 ol\ L "rn, Rw` 4JP ~ ) l j \ Y Y p a 4pl t G ~ ~ tyo` s fia a~ Lw n O _ lyplt tvl o ~ r a ~ - ..ont ` f3 ~J p \ tG9~ p i Fs' : t '~9 A -LO D nF Yd`Y ~L r It T 2 s ti~ ~ N 1 s~ / ~l~TI"7 Qja W N FAX NO. 303 466 2368 O,.% . T\ rr Le\" a 1° Y . 94"t rtw - {,It, • i r 3 Z 140\ IFAII " I 0 A I~ nmt. i n rt i fi ~ ~ l~pt Q o `P z ml j 5 P. 03 i rJ,JXfS Ylp _ ~1 1 IRS s 1 I II 1 m n A A I W Z -a _ S ~m 69 a u gaMS F d4jy10 jkl ~?YS F A C S I M I L E CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING 8; DEVELOPMENT 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80215 PH: 303-235-2846 FAX: 303-235-2857 T0: SCOTT BERNHART OF: MELODY HOMES FAX: 303-466-1838 PHONE: 303-466-1831 x1077 PAGES: a INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET. DATE: JUNE 5, 2002 RE: SKYLINE ESTATES FILING 3 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING. SCOTT, ATTACHED IS THE SAMPLE LETTER FOR NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGS. SOME OF THE REQUIRED COMPONENTS ARE MISSING IN YOUR LETTER. I LIKE YOUR DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION. A MEETING DATE OF JUNE 20TH WILL NOT WORK BECAUSE WE HAVE PLANNING COMMISSION THAT NIGHT. MONDAY (17TH), TUESDAY (18TH) OR WEDNESDAY (19TH) THAT WEEK WOULD WORK. CALL ME TOMORROW OR I'LL CALL YOU. I'D LIKE TO TALK ABOUT ZONING DISTRICTS. MARY l 4zom }.die &44 nl... Mawr 4 , PZ2~ City Wheat Ridge MEMORANDUM Department of Public Works TO: Mary Austin, Planner FROM: Greg Knudson, City Engineer . Mike Garcia, Development Review Engineer DATE: May 6, 2002 SUBJECT: City of Arvada, Skyline Estates, Filing No.2 - Public Works Response to Review Comments Dated March 4, 2002 In an effort to facilitate the May 8, 2002 deadline from the City of Arvada, Public Works has completed a non-comprehensive review of our March 4, 2002 comments, in conjunction with the second submittal package received on April 25th 2002 from the City of Arvada, with the following items noted: Drainage 1. The 35-feet of right-of-way required by the City of Arvada to accommodate the future design of the Columbine Basin drainage system is not shown on the latest submittal. Upon submittal of this information a detailed review can be completed. 2. The suggested retention pond, to be located along Ridge Road, is not shown on the plans. The drainage report indicates that there will be no adverse effects from the proposed design. We would request that the City of Arvada acknowledge that consideration has been given for this request, and the reasoning for not implementing this request. Upon submittal of this information a detailed review can be completed. 3. The request for an approval letter from the Yokum-Reno Ditch Company, was not received with this submittal. Grading & Erosion Control Plan 1. The request to provide the erosion control plan(s) for Filings 2 and 3 has not been done. Upon submittal of this information a detailed review can be completed. Survey Requirements 1. The request to show the boundary line between Wheat Ridge, Arvada and the Skyline Estates Filing 3 has not been done. 2. The request to indicate the ownership and dimensions of the property east of the Witback property has not been done. Submittal 2 ResponseMemo.wpd 3. The request to show t' Yokum-Reno Ditch Company irrige n easement has been done and is being reviewed. 4. The request to dedicate 50-feet of right-of-way dedication for Parfet Street for the area east of the Witback property has not been done. Upon submittal of this information, a detailed review can be completed. 5. The request to dedicate 35-feet of right-of-way, along with the proper alignment with Ridge Road, for the Columbine Basin future design to the City of Wheat Ridge has not been done. Upon submittal of this information, a detailed review can be completed. 6. The requested detention/retention area easement has not been done. Upon submittal of this information, a detailed review can be completed. Traffic Planning Original requirements outline in item 1 and 2 of the March 4, 2002 letter have not changed. Traffic Engineering 1. The request to align the Parfet Street right-of-way north of Ridge Road, and widen the south side Parfet Street right-of-way to the east has been done, and is being reviewed. 2. The request for a traffic impact study has not been done. Upon submittal of this information, a detailed review can be completed. 3. The request to consider an east-west alignment of local streets with the two access roads being Miller Street and Parfet Street has not been done. Please contact myself or Mike if you need any additional assistance with this project. Submittal 2 ResponseMemo.wpd Bob Goebel, 10:42 AM' 7/2002, Skyline estates Page 1 of 1 X-Sender: bobg/ci.wheatridge.co.us@pop3.norton.antivirus X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 11:42:01 -0700 To: gary@ci.arvada.co.us From: Bob Goebel <bobg@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: Skyline estates Cc: MaryA@ci.wheatridge.co.us, MikeG@ci.wheatridge.co.us Gary, We just had Mr. Witbak come in and speak with us about the project up at Ridge Road and Parfet Street. As you recall, he owns the property in Wheat Ridge that is in the alignment with the proposed Parfet street extension to the north of Ridge Road. I am concerned that he has not been contacted by the developer or Arvada regarding this project. I am also concerned that Scott told him that Wheat Ridge would condemn the property if necessary. This infuriated the resident and we are disappointed that Scott would make such a statement without our support or knowledge. We made it clear to Scott and to you that we would not be involved in any condemnation and that the property line dispute was purely a civil matter between the two owners. We also spoke about the relocation of this access point so that it would be completely in Arvada and not enter Wheat Ridge. As you know, our City Council would have to approve this ROW. Mr. Witbak is claiming ownership to the property as his fence has been there for more than twenty years. That is why he placed a shed and his above ground pool in that location. I suggest that the owner of the property contact Mr. Witbak to resolve this issue. Wheat Ridge will not support the project until this issue is resolved. Please keep me informed on your progress. Bob Printed for Mary Austin <marya@ci.wheatridge.co.us> 3/27/2002 7500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215 Wheat Telephone 303/ 235-2868 Ridge FAX 303/235-2857 March 4, 2002 Mr. Gary Hammond City of Arvada 8101 Ralston Road Arvada, Colorado 80001-8101 Re: Skyline Estates Filing #2 Dear Mr. Hammond, The City of Wheat Ridge has received your referral for the Skyline Estates Filing #2 and would like to take this opportunity to thank you for taking the time to meet with our development staff on Wednesday, February 20, 2002 to discuss issues pertaining to this development. The following comments are some of the issues that need to be addressed with the Skyline Estates development: Drainage 1. The development of Filing #2 (City of Arvada) and Filing #3 (City of Wheat Ridge) will require that the two cities work together to accommodate the drainage from these areas. The Columbine Basin Study that was approved in 1994 by Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (URDFCD) is to be followed with the required dedication necessary. The Study requires that there be a minimum of 35 feet of R.O.W. dedication along Ridge Road to acquire the land necessary for the future design of the Columbine Basin drainage system. The City of Wheat Ridge will require this dedication for the filing located within the Wheat Ridge boundary. It is the understanding that the City of Arvada is also requiring the 35 feet of R.O.W. dedication located within its boundary. The City of Wheat Ridge is suggesting that the developer locate a retention pond along Ridge Road in an effort to contain the newly developed flows. Soil tests should be completed at the cost to the developer in order to evaluate if a retention pond can be used as a temporary solution until there is a better solution to transmit this runoff to an appropriate outfall. It is our understanding from the meeting we had that the City of Arvada may allow the developer to construct a detention pond and allow historic release rates to flow east into the City of Wheat Ridge. There is concern regarding allowing any release into Wheat Ridge since there is no outfall for the runoff to flow. Also, with the implementation of Phase H water quality issues, it may be beneficial for both Cities to separate the Industrial Planned areas from the single family waters. We would like to work with the City of Arvada to incorporate the drainage system for this development to minimize the impact to either City. 2. The Yokum-Reno Ditch alignment in Filing #3 needs to be approved by the Ditch Company with a copy of the approval letter incorporated into the appendix of the Final Drainage Report. Grading & Erosion Control Plan 1. The grading for Filing #2 should not have an adverse effect on the City of Wheat Ridge. Grading for both Filing 92 & #3 should be incorporated to minimize the grading (cut and fill quantities). 2. An erosion control plan should be included for both Filings. Survey Requirements/Comments The following items currently need to be addressed : 1. The boundary line between the City of Arvada and the City of Wheat Ridge, and the Skyline Estates Filing #3 Subdivision boundary line need to be clearly indicated. 2. The ownership and dimensions of the property lying to the east of the Witback property need to be identified. An Irrigation Easement will need to be shown for the Yokum-Reno Ditch. 4. A 50 ft Right-of-Way dedication for Parfet Street will need to be made to the City of Wheat Ridge in the area east of the Witback property, in order to complete the connection of Parfet Street to Ridge Road. 5. A 35 It strip of Right-of-Way (which corresponds to the Urban Drainage master plan) needs to be dedicated to the City of Wheat Ridge. The North Right-of-Way line for the drainage area is to be parallel with Ridge Road, with the South Right-of-Way line for the drainage area being contiguous with the North Right-of-Way line of Ridge Road. 6. A Detention/Retention Easement area is to be shown on both of the documents for any areas which are determined to be used as such. Easement areas will need to be described using bearings and distances on both of the documents. Specific Language will also be required pertaining to the easement areas to be shown on both of the documents and will be required on all of the Final Plat and Final Development Plan documents. Traffic Planner Comments 1. The City of Wheat Ridge has adopted and made into policy a Streetscape Corridor Plan. This policy was accepted by the Wheat Ridge City Council in February 2001 and is now being implemented on all corridors indicated in the Streetscape Manual. We have enclosed Manual for your informational purposes. Under this new Policy, Ridge Road is listed as a road that will require the Streetscape requirements. There are no current designs that are to applied at this time for the Ridge Road corridor therefore the City of Wheat Ridge will require the developer to escrow for these future improvements. 2. Ridge Road is an identified streetscape and is subject to the City Council's adopted Streetscape and Architectural Design Manual requirements. Requirements may inlcude: detached sidewalks, associated treelawns with turf and irrigation and approved street trees, and/or escrow funds to be held for additional street amenities to be added by the City for an anticipated future streetscape project. The Traffic Planner, Mr. Dave Mentor may be reached at 303-235-2866 if you have any further questions regarding these requirements. Traffic Comments 1. Parfet Street Right-of-Way (ROW) extended alignment appears to be clear of private property and any encroachment between private property owners is a civil matter. We recommend that the ROW alignment of Parfet Street north of Ridge Road and the south connection should be widened to east at developers expense. 2. Traffic Impact Study is to include impacts south of Ridge Road, especially at the railroad crossings. Should safety gates be required at the railroad crossings, these are to be installed at the developers expense. 3. City of Wheat Ridge would prefer to see local streets on an east-west alignment with the two access roads being Miller Street and Parfet Street. The City Traffic Engineer, Mr. Steve Nguyen, P.E., may be reached at 303-235-2862 if you have any questions. Planning Comments In response to the referral from the City of Arvada regarding Skyline Estates Filing No. 2, the City of Wheat Ridge has the following comments: The City of Wheat Ridge staff recently met with Melody Homes in a pre-application meeting regarding Skyline Estates Filing No. 3. That proposed filing is within the boundaries of Wheat Ridge, on property east of and adjacent to Filing No. 2. It appears that the various filings of Skyline Estates are very similar with over lapping issues for both Arvada and Wheat Ridge. Wheat Ridge staff would like to participate in a joint planning effort to achieve an integrated and unified development. 2. The City has concerns regarding the open space area along the eastern boundary of Filing 2. We realize that this tract accommodates the water line for Valley Water District. The western edge of Filing 3 in Wheat Ridge is proposed to have lots which back onto this tract as well. We would prefer to see this area designed along a street alignment, instead of an unusable tract that could be a maintenance problem. 3. Further property research needs to be conducted in order to identify alterative solutions for the "areas of concern" (details A & B). The drawings need to clearly designate the city boundary between Arvada and Wheat Ridge to assure land is being properly platted. Ms. Mary Austin, City Planner, may be reached at 303-235-2852 if you have any questions. Conclusion These comments are a result from out meeting with the City of Arvada and the pre-application meeting the City of Wheat Ridge had with Melody Home on February 19, 2002. Thank you again for your time and cooperation in making this development beneficial for both Cities. The City of Arvada will be receiving a referral from the City of Wheat Ridge for Filing #3 when a formal application is received from Melody Homes. Please call me at 303-235-2868 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Michael Garcia Development Review Engineer cc: Robert Goebel, Public Works Director Greg Knudson, City Engineer Steve Nguyen, Traffic Engineer Dave Brossman, City Surveyor Dave Mentor, Traffic Planner Alan White, Director of Planning and Development Mary Austin, Planner File (3) Arvada _skyline _refenal.ltr Wheat Ridge Pl Ining and Development Dekartment PRE-APPLICATION MEETING SUMMARY Date: 1S R16 IDS Attending Applicant(s): Stp}}.A{ sV, Address/Phone: S\We, v~.1sw. ` . auri,c Attending Owner: Address/Phone: ti Attending Staff: T CMLI M• (=txci..;i~ !A- AusKv% K Qtsux, ar ss mwn M• J~kc.Keek-'~ D Mu.~er s, ~~LLVen , ~ G.<b~\ Address or Specific Site Location: d~2 l h~R tSen S} Existing Zoning: X. Existing Comp. Plan: Ai60- Applicant/Owner Preliminary Proposal: PR-zone \ta~XM 'ti s1n.b a,L +o J\\..y J;r s;..Jte t`aMel lnaaiin~l JSe• Res \ be = 1, 04 rte (141X 1ya - 43 homy, ln~• a 4.2~ ac ~5 y o f (-Ar~ - \rtb. \and w:\\ b, Ala a P"+ d Wog,.\a k44 AID YWxc er ~,M?oc Will a neighborhood meeting need to be held prior to application submittal? `1 es Planning comments: [ Cow.m~lS~w' i C+~ ~'ax.c4.t . Tt'~P ~ V bo}4. .a i1'e\:«.:..xQ 1)ea'l, P1~. F~h~l ~ww'•t, t`~a,. ~ mss ~nolwd.e rca. ` t^ 'dne PR\~ a,it(u3c Coorn• (t VAS 44" a 2Sy. ~f t\... ass 1>r 1 x~ F uvs e: rcgJ:ceb jose t%, tnd. Or<a 5 Public Works comments: r1j0\rt a aa~bv.VA *0 Q: k3L p.a Re rnal to r<y&cea 2 a ~n ~325, ~ OAS.'„ :5 n.p\a,..e,•~ed.. • nn 1 - _ aas:., \be4:3„ - 35' ded:uho~ --M be. .r- tV"~4- \ rota Cpoiklh\a in Sv) (Z') ° b< FJ^~~(en b\ wm*%l Swan V, W1.k ZCC.a"hM• ~.~•tc~.. - tn~a\ ~r'„r~e, 1 Ya'aS\.., eo(~~+oi ` Fi-til C-~ra~ P\a(n v~~\ 1oe rcgovte~, ~4ern c~ t1 bcs<u4ea bQ th, 3S' O•v dea~~aiun 2ba+. aex of iti.° pe.•~, w,.i3 b.( loc,xi.a ~r zn. CTUM,°cf. T►••is tot ..~1n.a. Qom.. n ire@~c \~npact SFv b,k i\\ `oQ Hq~~t~d dw.topww~~ L\ Uua:~ Ina. A+e~ ti Building comments: Streetscape/Architectural Design comments: mat Po~J is streRk-SC e~t~igq,{Qa siruF - ~Me~< t5 eass~bl;i1 h,~t a} {;w ^ F d-V - u4A e..t ~ tt ~kJCJ a?\~s t rcc s a u r{~e ~ bw.e~.i'RiS w.vl be regN\re3. Other comments: Staff Initials: l~ f 1~1 V1V 4' 1V111~rJ Skyline Filing 3 Fact Sheet City of Wheat Ridge Pre-Application February 19,2002 1:30PM Total Site- 17.1 acres Single Family- 7.04 acres (41%) 43 homes Industrial- 4.26 acres (25%) Open Space- 1.76 acres (10%) Right-of-Way- 4.00 acres (24%) Gross Density (w/out ind.)- 3.34 du/acre Proposed Zone District- R1C 5,000sf--min. lot size 30' front setback 5' side setback 10' rear setback 25% lot landscaped Public Works 4' walk width (attached) 50' ROW for local streets 25p~ 2~~ Parks/Open Space Dedication of Parks- 43homes X 0.016acre = 0.69 acre dedicated (4% of site) Cash in Lieu- Value of 0.69 acres post platting Encroachments- Porches/Decks/Patio- 8' front encroachment 1/3 side encroachment Architectural Features- 30" encroachment i,V Ft~- -TG7--\ .l v c iI! a I. I~ F T m 04% V7 I-F E~\\ - ZO'd TT:8 ZOOZ 6T 9aj ZZ8Z469-2x:: j -G*UIW R*MDl 41n'7.00 - lIeywaF i hltthtt~ i I yyxy1,, --wry rax:ow~yu-[es[[ _ Jai zw,, llwo P.02 ABM p ARH~IX •HEAI)~~ J I -'ter ~ Y'I vl C f i'/G75 Z V N li] i/ r E LL p o ug~ ih E c h 'R 5 ~ a o c` K¢ ri u O¢ f m F -V fi Y Q Q J c b l ~a z A Q V fi C 3 Y fi Y Q j E Z 3 P1.h Al tf P.~ Y cL. L d SkyllhelL Skctch Plate s 200 t~ RU S& H0 Me roper}y tar •r Rer<weI Plat: Sitt Over-lay Mel 01y Koller S O%c . B. Saft Ber►t~ •r+ 3 .re;op 1IOv ri I I I I I I ~ 1 I1 11 I ~ i -_J L--J L- -J l 1 - god 1= f. y T I I I I I t - C.. o - 1~ ..1 Q S :y t l I I I I ( t i i i S' I I I I I I I S 4~ II it +II i r Lrr~ Lse~.C La .1` II II II I ~ 1 II it II I t it It II It 1l II it li II 1t ~ I City of Wheat Ridge Planning and Development Department Memorandum TO: Alan White Michael Pesicka Meredith Reckert Mike Garcia Darin Morgan Dave Brossman Mary Austin Dave Menter Travis Crane Steve Nguyen FROM: Kathy Field SUBJECT: 2/19 Pre-App Meeting DATE: February 11, 2002 One (1) pre-app is scheduled for Tuesday, February 19th at 1:30 p.m. The applicant is Melody Homes. Please see their attached proposal and site plan. krv L 2l\0(/02- \~t O WL_ 17~°-6 0 5 J<tir~ - S 471~L~? U -08-02 FRI 01:38 P' MELODY HOMES, INC. FAX NO. 303 466 2368 j` To: City of Wheat Ridge Skyline Filing 3 General Description Applicant- Melodyl-lomes Subject- Skyline Filing 3 Jurisdiction- Wheat Ridge, Colorado Melody 11omes is requesting initial review of the proposed Skyline Filing 3 site layout for approximately 17.66 acres within the City of Wheat Ridge. The proposed development would include 43 home sites with anticipated lot sizes at or above 6,600sf. riling 3 of Skyline Estates will include a north south coimection between W. 54 Avenue ,aid ridge Road (Nelson Street). An industrial tract is shown along Ridge Road, in accordance with the most recent master plan (Ridge Home Property Urban Renewal Plan) While this plan was adopted by the City oFArvada in 1999, the plan appears to be the most recent master plan covering this area of Wheat Ridge and Arvada. The future industrial area would be approximately 3 acres in sire and able to accommodate between 100 and 150 employees in up to a 50,000sf facility. P. 02 1 r~l,.~ . 'r~`•i FILING NO. RVADA t `a E~li LANE r.-.. ..yam h Gj s Sys /que , . f ICI fUL%l e ;a~ Psi N ~ _ 4t -t. 54-0 i 1 ` i rte' i Zoo+ ± ---11 IV- - (iI',Y'I .1.101 111'!1 'Al. I I'll ?O'. Z G~ G g 1 ~ ste) P PTlnn lrzt 9.;ryn.n C . IVi Vi 1 I. L,. (uo uI ul d ~::Xne+n.aR.e Ia.3 SOIDII 1I.I.A01 -IT U('ELOHIENTIFIL1011( Nfl.Al R a ' I. j _ ~ ' ~RTP IDOF ~uaa ry wAlw slctj s eY IR'm w f fie x'X wL_ tl] . (uzw4xl I fGENg T - - AI M ® -?11~ E sa a unE SwW aFla 1111.1 le CAP SET BE MERRICI< k CD 7 in - 11MmRI5t cult if YI/i, 6 COR k WNEAI RIDGE Ron, ~ - / III Iii ,x ¢vl ul In PLASTIC CAP - PL 21001 I RN11.M1O~ 1W OIfR$EC¶wi Ib " NoT~ - ~rla, . S 12<Q! IBWITHL NO. C5CREAP - RAR LWTH 2- I rON 1101<nO ,tmVITA ll'w Ay r i-111 -NWI14 ofU Ilia SVI14 III eEasinen1i l6Ol O 19 elween Elbe moots, WAsl l OR I I If • - I- . %Ijits l-ado .,,al 1/I6 CORNER MARXINGS 190D033 vtl 01 It p~O k n I 'lh SW E riper of Ill. NW114 start the SW aoner of 11,A NWI14 of Ile. SWI/!. IT1 PLASTIC CAP - LS LI Z55' COLA µ0 nCC a 2I!1mnI 11111st - Pnnnll aces Are d 11Y1 PLABRC CM - LS 12438 ml Bl I llbo d pemnlpee' m mtl by Maiddlaa SOrvoyln8, Inc M foul CAP 3. La N d Po 0 arum Ma Cn2 doled - Chp IN MONUMENT BOX SET BY CONCRETE LEGEND - B ml 2fi, 199fi, wams ePaalnV lr Cly ll11d 1 P I No, for MC.record5563i dal , e ,eomdl t0 - w lost. I Y aammanlc and 1 n hrr ncec Its ]W ptararauan of .R MONUMENI' RECORD - c, CENIF.RI IN[ - Oda l a,a, IMBUT CAP - Mom. RIGHT-Of,-WAY - 1 - 1 . 0- any. POLE ,I. If'- - veYed ell- is e-I Inmlod wliBln Ipe 100 year /land z e per TEMA - ' AT11 PLASTC CAP - 1.S 1900:1 OIJ OAS METER' I_} PAD MOUNT TRANSfORMER Flood Insistence Rala Mop for Ill. City of Arvada, Comatl,nlfy no. 085071 e... I WAIN 140. 5 REOAR MET 2• CM ELECTRIC METER 0 STMM SEWER MANHOLE , Ala, No. 181050 1 led FnLn ory 19. 1992 (Zone 'N ) and for IN. O,,, al 1/16 CORNER MARKINGS V- OVERHEAD URIITT LINE at TELEPHbNC MANIIOLE Wi1en R n 1 Id0C m I Y !1 0851179, Ile, No, OnOSC ulalorl Tely ary 4 Apt 2• ALLOY r'AP - PLS 27601 €0 INI£T . w PI WATER VALE 190fl (2anv! I R MARKINGS AR OML MI ITERATED P PRE TI , T CLEAN (NT - - 5 Properly a hlacl to di41` rlObto. USTC pnP - bif' ME PE iEL6PIA0N PEpESTAI. - A - urypERGR011lIO CAS LINE (PAINTED) ' PVT POF NIR1 CUY AHCIwR - LINMRCROUND 1EIEPIIOR ONE (PAINTED) B. Iloense re virded In Doak 28311 of Page B84 does not fled Iles. cU.. IWAP III $0111 I': All TOUT CAP - BENT -'Nz._ UNDE.RGRoump rLECIRIC IINC (PAINT-ny _ Ann OBLITERATED PLA611G.CAP MI S CAS VALVE' SANITARY SEW R ANII MG '0 AREA LIGHT' - NOTICE A coo mfln9 la Calara de l rv Y mast corume a r ay /loll, IMUe I naY la 9a I ,,Irian eased qo,1 an, dated rn .11i, /,,I, m +I~ryN ml Imyrw,l Mpmarpy~lYalANhlES1.A(A~ YIy11N@Or-VI ' T11 PUSTIC CAP - LS 0300 " DITCH LINE - t 1 s- bi liI, hreeenyn dbr map da/e I In nn , I .elan Based upon a n,n dv/act e . . {W II Blitl® SIf-~ ' 7L1 I slle gFr '~~I-- ~ r fFM1ICE LINE " a In /Ale vvrav Is. m,mnenved n MeI n Yanra Irn,n he aoln a/ nrn ~e I lm I a rll. r 1 - a t _ . . . ~ aa ,arann. ee n mr„ , i anl... lell.iaa~.. M 11 ll+al V lo, loe..•'IAa City of Wheat Ridge d I Department of Public Works MEMORANDUM TO: Mike Garcia, Development Review Engineer FROM: Dave Brossman, City Surveyor DATE: Thursday, February 21, 2002 SUBJECT: Skyline Estates Mike - Here is a quick re-cap of some surveying issues which were discussed during our meeting with the staff from the City of Arvada in regards to the Skyline Estates Filing #3 Subdivision. These items currentlyneed to be addressed on both the Plat and the PreliminaryDevelopment Plan, and at a future date will be required on all final documents. 1. The boundary linebetween the City of Arvada and the City ofWheat Ridge, and the Skyline Estates Filing #3 Subdivision boundary line need to be clearly indicated. 2. The ownership and dimensions ofthe property lying to the east ofthe Witbackproperty need to be identified. 3. An Irrigation Easement will need to be shown for the Yokum-Reno Ditch. 4. A 50 ft Right-of-Way dedication for Parfet Street will need to be made to the City of Wheat Ridge in the area east of the Witback property, in order to complete the connection of Parfet Street to Ridge Road. 5. A35ft strip ofRight-of-Way (which corresponds to the Urban Drainage master plan) needs to be dedicated to the City of Wheat Ridge. The North Right-of-Way line for the drainage area is to be parallel with Ridge Road, with the South Right-of-Way line for the drainage areabeing contiguous with the NorthRight-of-Way line of Ridge Road. 6. A Detention/Retention Easement area is to be shown on both of the documents for any areas which are determined to be used as such. Easement areas will need to be described using bearings and distances on both ofthe documents. Specific Language will also be required pertaining to the easement areas to be shown on both of the documents and will be required on all of the Final Plat and Final Development Plan documents. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance in this matter. David F. Brossman, P.L.S. 7500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Wheat Telephone 303/ 235-2868 Ridge FAX 303/235-2857 EC E0 SEP 1 6 2002 September 14, 2002 Mr. Mike Elms Community Development Director City of Arvada 8101 Ralston Road Arvada, Colorado 80001-8101 COMMUNITY DEVEL. DEPT. Re: Skyline EstaiesTiiirrg-#2 & #3 Dear Mr. Elms, The City of Wheat Ridge would like the City of Arvada Planning Commission to consider the following request for the hearing for Skyline Estates Filing #2: ❑ The City of Wheat Ridge will request that Melody Homes construct the public improvements along the north side of Ridge Road at the time of construction of the single family residences. The public improvements shall include: curb, gutter, detached walk, bike lanes and the open channel required by the Columbine Basin Study. City staff has concluded that there is sufficient impact by the proposed development warranting these improvements at this time. The developer has proposed that these improvements be tied to the development of the industrial parcels. There are two concerns with allowing the developer to defer these improvements until such time. Specifically that there is no established deadline as to when these lots will be developed, and the lots may be developed over different time periods. Regarding the first concern, the lots may not be developed for several years while the impact from the new neighborhoods is an immediate impact. Lack of public improvements will limit the accessibility surrounding the new subdivisions. Regarding the second concern is the low probability of both industrial parcels developing at the same time. Should one parcel develop immediately and the other sits vacant for several years, the problem again refers back to the lack of continuity for the Ridge Road improvements. Th ity of Wheat Ridge would like to thank you and staff for your time and consideration in this matter. S' c ely, Greg Knudson, M.P.A. Interim Public Works Director Page 2 Comments Skyline Estates, #2 SFD (Sketch Plan) SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING COMMENTS: Vanderhoof Elementary is currently using three temporary classrooms. The School District would request fees in-lieu-of land dedications for this plat based on the City of Arvada Land Development Regulations. Any fees in-lieu-of amounts would be held in escrow accounts for future application by the School District in accordance with our procedures and the City of Arvada Land Development Regulations. Sincerely, Kathy Tully Director Property Management /Jp xc: Ron Mitchell Kathy Frank Barbara Goings Jay Stewart North Transportation J JEFFCO PUBLIC SCHOOLS Building Bright Futures PLANNING COMMENTS JEFFERSON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. R-1 EDUCATIONAL SERVICES CENTER 1829 DENVER WEST DRIVE P. O. BOX 4001 GOLDEN, COLORADO 80401-0001 !r Property Management Department 1829 Denver West Dave, Building #27 Golden, GO 80401. phone: 303-982-6755'. fax: 303-982-6804 http.,/204.98.1.2/property/ SUBDIVISION NAME: Skyline Estates, #2 LOCATION: S of W 58th Ave, W of Independence St, N of 1-70 & overlapping the Burlington RR DATE: Feb. 7, 2002 STATUS: Sketch Plan Number and Type of Dwelling Units: 80 SFD Total Dwelling Elementary Middle Senior Total Units Yield Yield Yield Yield 80 SFD .50 .26 TOTAL FROM THIS PROPOSAL: 40 Elementary 20 Middle School 20 Senior High 1.02 80 Total It is estimated that costs to provide classroom facilities for the students anticipated from this proposed development will be $1,449,420. Currently students from this proposed development will attend: Vanderhoof Elementary School - 5875 Routt Ct, Arvada 80004 Drake Middle School - 12550 W 52nd Ave, Arvada 80002 Arvada West Senior High School - 11325 Allendale Dr, Arvada 80004 The present capacities and enrollments for these schools are: T CAPACITY 6 ; ; 03104 CPC NEW ADDN NEW PC TEMP BLDG TOTAL CAP Vanderhoof 514 520 514 594 0 594 f594 3 675 669 868 0 868 0 868 1622 1748 0 1748 0 1994 CPC - Current Program Capacity represents the number of student spaces that are available if there are no temporary buildings at the school. NEW PC - New Program Capacity. the CPC +the New Additions Capactyy. This represents the number of student spaces that will be available at the school when additions or additional spaces are constructed from the 1992 Bond Issue. PERM DSGN CAP - Permanent Design Capacity (the way the school was buih) Totul CAP -Total Capacity is the Permanent Design Capacity plus the capacity of the temporary building(s). NOTE: These are estimates from School District comp g and may be subject to change. s LSO 9001 .26 1 i Our Mission: To provide a quality education that prepares all children for a successful future. Oftlip 'y HoMeS Inc. a D.R. HORTON COMPANY May 7, 2002 Members of the Planning Commission City of Arvada VIA: Hand Delivery Re: Skyline II Dear Commissioner, We have submitted our formal application for rezoning for the 26 acre "Skyline II" community. The property is located between the existing Skyline community and Ridge Road. As you may remember from your review of our informal sketch plan last November, we propose building single family homes on the northern, uphill portion of this property. Two parcels fronting Ridge Road are being reserved for industrial use per the Ridge Home Plan. We hope to move into the "Skyline II" community in Spring 2003 as we complete our last homes in our original Skyline community. We look forward to working with your staff, members of the Planning Commission and the Council in achieving the thorough and timely review of our proposal. Since our presentation to Planning Commission we have been working with staff to address their comments and those of adjoining property owners, the Planning Commission and City Council. Attached you will find the cover letter outlining changes to our initial proposal. We want you to see the value and quality Melody Homes brings to Arvada and urge each of you to visit our Skyline Community model homes. Skyline is Arvada's most popular new home community.... over 100 families are on the waiting list. The majority of our purchasers are current residents of Arvada. As part of Melody's longstanding commitment to housing affordability, we are continuing to offer a discount to all public employees. This discount, coupled with Melody's well-known quality and value, has made Melody the builder of choice for the families of hundreds of public employees throughout the metro area. Skyline sales prices are currently ranging from approximately $250,000 to $350,000. Ten different models, each with two elevations, range in size from 1605 square feet to 2505 square feet. The most popular models are 2 stories at 1870, 2033 and 2505 square feet, and the 2043 square foot ranch. Even though we must change our designs to meet Arvada's new Design Standards, visiting our existing model homes provides you an opportunity to experience Melody's commitment to quality, value and design; a commitment evident with all new designs to be presented in our proposed Skyline H community. (cer B. Scott Bernhart, AICP Community Planner CC: Mike Elms, Director of Community Development; Gary Hammond, Senior Planner 11031 Sheridan Boulevard • Westminster, CO 80020 • 303.466.1831 9 Fax 303.466.1838 9 www.melodyhomesinc.com We fully understand the logic and regional benefit of Parfet being continuous from 54`h to the I-70 frontage road. We are willing to do everything reasonable and within our power to assist both Wheat Ridge and Arvada in achieving this connection. av Ridge Road right-of-w We were pulled from the last Planning Commission Agenda because Wheat Ridge alleged the existence of a 20 ft "no man's land" between our property and the ROW of Ridge Road. The deed from the State of Colorado to our property owner quite clearly extends to "the northerly right-of way" of Ridge Road. We are working with our surveyor and the Title Company to clarify and eliminate any discrepancy in the deed and surveys. We are confident that we will have the necessary information supporting our deed and Ridge Road access before FDP and Final Plat approval. We would strenuously object to any additional delay in the consideration of this Preliminary Plat and PDP because of this issue. Should you desire an update on our efforts in this regard we would be pleased to accommodate. Thank you for the time an effort you and the other professionals on staff have put into working with us on this project. We believe that these few, relatively straightforward issues and the lack of conflict with the neighborhood is indicative of not only the quality of our proposal, but the quality of the effort on all our parts. Melody Homes a D.R. HORTON COMPANY September 6, 2002 Mr. Gary Hammond Senior Planner 8101 Ralston Road City of Arvada Arvada, Colorado 80001-7437 VIA HAND DELIVERY Re: Skyline Estates Filing 2 PDP Dear Gary, In response to your request that we address the few remaining areas of discussion we offer the following. Ridge Road Improvements It is our understanding that based on discussions between Arvada and Wheat Ridge staff, Arvada staff is now recommending that we be required to install improvements to Ridge Road at the time we construct the residential portion of this development. We believe that the original position of the City is appropriate and we would agree to build the Ridge Road improvements at the time of the actual development of the 3.22-acre industrial parcel fronting Ridge Road. Parfet Street Extension Again, based on discussions with Wheat Ridge, you are now requesting that we agree to acquire and extend Parfet Street from the southern boundary of our property, across property in Wheat Ridge that we don't own and to then construct Parfet Street to its intersection with Ridge Road. We have agreed to contact the owner of the Wheat Ridge property (Vernon and Diane Witback) to determine whether there is any interest in selling a portion of their property fronting Ridge Road. To date our phone calls have not been returned. We are willing to convey to Arvada the right-of-way for the Parfet across property we own in an alignment acceptable to the City. Further, we are willing to construct Parfet within the ROW we own. We believe that it is not our responsibility to acquire property in Wheat Ridge and to extend Parfet to Ridge Road. Our plan proposes 3 points of access in addition to the future Parfet/Ridge Road connection. The residential portion of our property could be developed without a single access to Ridge Road relying instead on 2 points of access to 54th Avenue. 11031 Sheridan Boulevard* Westminster, 00 80020 9 303.466.1831 • Fax 303.466.1838 • www.meIodyhomesinc.com STAFF REPORT PAGE 19. protects critical wildlife habitat, and otherwise accomplishes the purposes and intent of the Land Development Code. 4. The subdivision complies with all applicable use, development, and design standards set forth in Article 6 and Article 7 of the Land Development Code that have not otherwise been modified or waived. Applicants shall avoid creating lots or patterns of lots in the subdivision that will make compliance with such development and design standards difficult or infeasible. 5. The subdivision complies with all applicable regulations, standards, requirements, or plans of the federal or state governments and other relevant jurisdictions, including but not limited to wetlands, water quality, erosion control, and wastewater regulations. 6. The subdivision will not result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment, including air, water, noise, storm water management, wildlife, and vegetation, or such impacts will be substantially mitigated. 7. The subdivision will not result in significant adverse impacts on adjacent properties, or such impacts will be substantially mitigated. 8. Adequate and sufficient public safety, transportation, utility facilities and services, recreation facilities, parks, and schools are available to serve the subject property, while maintaining sufficient levels of service to existing development. 9. As applicable, the proposed phasing plan for development of the subdivision is rational in terms of available infrastructure capacity. The Planning Commission could recommend denial of the preliminary plat if they find it does not meet any one of the approval criteria as stated above. The recommended conditions for the PDP above shall also be required in the Preliminary Plat for approval. skylineldoc STAFF REPORT PAGE 18. 18. COMMUNITY TRAIL ALONG RIDGE ROAD. A community trail is required along Ridge Road, which consists of 6.5' wide detached off-street trail and parallel on-street trail. The developer will be required to build the community trails as part of the municipal improvements along Ridge Road. 19. ENCROACHMENTS. The preliminary development plan indicates that there are several by the neighboring property owner. The developer must address the encroachments into Block 5 of the area for industrial development and for the extension of Parfet Street right-of-way. To the extent that they involve land to be dedicated to the City, the encroachment must be removed prior to dedication. The City will not accept dedication of land that involves a possession /title dispute. This issue must be resolved prior to application of a Final Development Plan. 20. SUBDIVI DER'S/ DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. The developer must sign a Subdivider's/ Development Agreement prior to approval of the final plat by the Community Development Director. PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW A preliminary plat is incorporated into the PDP. It provides for necessary rights-of-way, easements and other plat design requirements through the development. PRELIMINARY PLAT SUMMARY It is the responsibility of the applicant to provide information to the Planning Commission to demonstrate that the preliminary plat meets the following approval criteria. The Planning Commission will need to hear the testimony at the public hearing and evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed preliminary plat. The Planning Commission could recommend approval of the preliminary plat, if they find it meets all of the approval criteria as follows: 1. The subdivision is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The subdivision is consistent with and implements the intent of the specific zoning district in which it is located. 3. The general layout of lots, roads, driveways, utilities, drainage facilities, and other services within the proposed subdivision is designed in a way that minimizes the amount of land disturbance, maximizes the amount of open space development, preserves existing trees/ vegetation and riparian areas, STAFF REPORT PAGE 17. the street or outside of these fences. Screen fencing must be installed by the developer prior to receiving a certificate of occupancy for any lot adjacent to the fence. In addition, fencing for the individual lots must be in conformance with the fencing plan approved as part of the Skyline Estates Filing No. 2 development plan. 13. FIRE DISTRICT COMMENTS. The developer should be aware of the comments received from the Arvada Fire Protection District in relationship to development of the property. 14. FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT AND FINAL CONSTRUCTION PLANS. The final drainage report and the final construction plans for utilities in the subdivision must be approved by the City Engineer prior to approval of the final plat by the Community Development Director. 15. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ESCROW. The developer must comply with the requirements of Article V, Chapter 27 of the Municipal Code, which includes requirements for escrowing for public improvements and street restoration in developments. 16. PARFET STREET EXTENSION. Right-of-way for Parfet Street to Ridge Road must be acquired and Parfet Street constructed as part of the residential portion of Skyline Estates Filing 2. All reasonable effort shall be made by the developer to acquire the necessary right-of-way and the developer shall pay its proportional share of the cost for such right-of-way acquisition and its proportional share of the construction of the connection of Parfet Street to Ridge Road. When constructed, it should be lined up with existing Parfet Street south of Ridge Road. This alignment, including the alignment on the south side of Ridge Road, must be shown on the construction plans for Skyline Estates Filing 2. The right-of-way for extension of Parfet Street must be secured prior to submittal of a Final Development Plan/Plat. 17. OAK STREET EXTENSION. Prior to application for approval of the Final Development Plan, the developer must provide evidence of title for the full amount of land needed to connect Oak Street to Ridge Road. However, if Parfet Street from Skyline Filing 2, in Arvada and Nelson Street in Skyline Filing 3, in Wheat Ridge are connected to Ridge Road, it will not be necessary for the developer to connect Oak Street to Ridge Road. STAFF REPORT PAGE 16. 4. SCHOOL LAND DEDICATION. The developer shall pay a school land dedication fee in accordance with Section 7.12.4 of the Land Development Code, in lieu of dedication of land, to the city prior to approval of the final plat for Skyline Estates Filing No. 2. 5. ELEVATIONS. All dwellings in the project shall meet or exceed the Residential Architecture Standards of Section 6.6.2 and 6.6.3 of the Land Development Code. 6. RANCH MODELS. Ranch models in Skyline Estates Filing No. 2 will be permitted to have a maximum lot coverage of 40%. 7. AFFORDABLE HOUSING. The developer must provide seven affordable housing- small lots in accordance with Section 6.10 of the Land development Code for his share of the affordable housing requirement. These lots measure 50 X 100 feet, or 5,000 square feet in size. 8. PIPING OF THE IRRIGATION DITCH. The developer must pipe and provide an easement for the Juchem Ditch as it runs through the site. 9. RESIDENTIAL LANDSCAPING. The developer must provide deciduous street trees between the detached sidewalk and the curb as shown on the Landscaping Plan, in conformance to Section 6.5.3 of the Land Development Code. 10. OPEN SPACE LANDSCAPING. The developer intends to plant a variety of evergreen and deciduous trees, shrubs and ground cover in the open space tracts as shown on the landscaping plan. Landscaping for these areas must be installed by the developer prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for any lot adjacent to the tract. However, due to the current drought conditions, escrow funds are being required in the amount of 110% of the installation cost for the landscaping. The developer must meet the current policy in effect at the time a certificate of occupancy is requested. 11. OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE. The Skyline Estates Homeowners Association must maintain the 2.03 acres of landscaped open space planned for the subdivision, in perpetuity. 12. SCREENING FENCE. The developer must provide a 6' solid wood-screening fence with brick posts on the west and east property lines and on the property lines adjacent to West 53rd Avenue and West 54th Avenue, with the finished side facing STAFF REPORT PAGE 15. 7. To the maximum extent feasible, the proposal mitigates any potential significant adverse impacts on adjacent properties or on the general community. 8. Sufficient public safety, transportation, and utility facilities and services are available to serve the subject property, while maintaining sufficient levels of service to existing development. 9. The same development could not be accomplished through the use of other techniques, such as height exceptions, variances, or minor modifications. It is the responsibility of the applicant to justify the requested preliminary development plan. The Planning Commission will need to hear the testimony at the public hearing and evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the request based upon that testimony. The Planning Commission could recommend denial of the preliminary development plan if they find it does not meets any one of the approval criteria as stated above. It is the opinion of the Planning Staff that the Preliminary Development Plan for Skyline Estates Filing 2 is in conformance with the codes and ordinances of the City of Arvada and can be recommended to City Council for approval. If the Planning Commission chooses to recommend approval of this request, the following conditions should be made a part of that approval: 1. LAND DEDICATION. The developer is required to pay a land dedication fee in accordance with Section 7.11.5 of the Land Development Code. For this development the city will be requiring payment of a fee equal to a land area of 1.98 acres at its current market value, in lieu of dedicating property. This fee must be paid prior to approval of a final development plan/plat on the site. 2. PARK DEVELOPMENT FEE. The developer shall pay a per unit park development fee prior to approval of the final development plan/plat. This fee is currently $1043.81 per single-family dwelling unit or $73,067 for the filing. 3. TREE MITIGATION. The developer will be required to replace 234.5 caliper inches of live trees that are planned for removal from the property, on a one- inch to one-inch ratio. STAFF REPORT PAGE 14. marketed to another developer. Preliminary development plans will need to be approved by the Planning Commission and City Council for these parcels. The following conditions will apply to industrial development. 1. Parfet Street to Ridge Road must be constructed as part of Skyline Estates Filing 2. When constructed, it must be lined up with existing Parfet Street south of Ridge Road. This alignment, including the alignment on the south side of Ridge Road, must be shown on the construction plans. The right-of-way for expansion of Parfet Street shall be secured prior to application of the Final Development Plan. 2. A community trail is required along Ridge Road which consists of a 6.5' wide detached off-street trail and a parallel on-street trail. PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUMMARY The Planning Commission could recommend approval of the Preliminary Development Plan only if it finds that they meet all of approval criteria set forth in 53.7.3.H of the Land Development Code as follows: 1. The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan or reflects conditions that have changed since the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposal is consistent with any previously approved amended Outline Development Plan. 3. The PUD addresses a unique situation, confers a substantial benefit to the City, or incorporates creative site design such that it achieves the purposes set out in 54.10.1 and represents an improvement in quality over what could have been accomplished through strict application of the otherwise applicable district or development standards. This may include but is not limited to improvements in open space provision and access; environmental protection; tree/vegetation preservation; efficient provision of streets, roads, and other utilities and services; or increased choice of living and housing environments. 4. The PUD complies with all applicable use, development, and design standards set forth in the Land Development Code that are not otherwise modified or waived according to the approved terms of the PUD development plan. 5. The PUD is consistent with and implements the intent of the specific PUD district, and shall comply with all applicable threshold standards and PUD development/ design standards set forth in §4.10 of the Land Development Code. 6. The PUD is integrated and connected with adjacent development through street connections, sidewalks, trails, and similar features. STAFF REPORT PAGE 13. adjacent to the irrigation easement, Tract H. All other property line fencing will be the standard 6' solid wood fence. Trees on the site: A tree inventory has been provided as part of the-preliminary plan development and reviewed by the City's Landscape Architect. There are 29 trees existing on the site, with most of them being elm or cottonwoods. More than a third of the trees are located along the existing Juchem Ditch. The developer will be required to replace any live trees that are removed from the property, on a one-inch to one-inch ratio. As proposed the plan shows 234.5 caliper inches that the developer needs to replace. A total of 202 trees meeting the required caliper inches will be added to the site during development. Preliminary Landscaping Plan: A landscaping plan has been submitted. as of the preliminary development plan. The developer intends to plant a variety of evergreen and deciduous trees, shrubs and ground cover in the open space tracts as shown on the landscaping plan. Landscaping for these areas must be installed by the developer prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for any lot adjacent to the tract. However, due to the current drought, funds are being escrowed for these improvements until such time as they can be irrigated. The applicant also will provide deciduous trees between the detached sidewalk and the curb, in conformance to Section 6.5.3 of the Land Development Code. Train Noise: Engineering Dynamics Incorporated has completed a study concerning railroad noise impact on the Skyline development. The analysis included an assessment of the impact of vehicular traffic on Ridge Road and train traffic from the BNSF railway line that runs adjacent to Ridge Road. This line runs to the Coors Brewing facility in Golden, Colorado. The distance from the Ridge Road and BNSF Railroad to the closest residential lot in Skyline Estates Filing No. 2 is 450 feet to 500 feet, respectively. The study concludes that roadway and railroad noise over the entire Skyline Estates Filing No. 2 shows a combined DNL level (Day/Night) of 57, which gives the development a Normally Acceptable rating. The railroad noise level was calculated by using the Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Railway Noise Prediction procedure as outlined in 'The Noise Guidebook.' A DNL under 65 is considered acceptable for development of a project on a site adjacent to a railroad. FUTURE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT Included in the development is 5.88 acres of property that will remain PUD-I (Planned Unit Development-Industrial). The industrial portion of the development will be STAFF REPORT PAGE 12. block on Parfet Street, Owens Street and Oak Court. These areas will be landscaped by the developer and are included in the landscaping plan. The Skyline Estates Homeowners Association must maintain all open space tracts for Filing 2. Encroachments: The preliminary development plan indicates that there are several encroachments by the neighboring property owner into Block 5 of the area for industrial development and for the extension of Parfet Street right-of-way. The developer must address these areas of encroachment and to the extent that they involve land to be dedicated to the City, the encroachment must be removed prior to dedication. The City will not accept dedication of land that involves a possession /title dispute. This issue must be resolved prior to application for the Final Development Plan. Land Dedication: The developer is required to pay a land dedication fee in accordance with Section 7.11.5 of the Land Development Code prior to approval of the final plat. Park Development Fee: The developer shall pay a per unit park development fee prior to approval of the final development plan/plat. This fee is currently $1043.81 per single- family dwelling unit. Impact on Schools: The Jefferson County R-1 School District states that students generated from this development will attend Vanderhoof Elementary, Drake Middle School and Arvada West Senior High. The District projects 40 elementary students, 20 middle school students and 20 senior high students for a total of 80 students from the Skyline Estates Subdivision. School Land Dedication Fee: The developer shall pay a school land dedication fee in accordance with Section 7.12.4 of the Land Development Code, in lieu of dedication of land, to the city prior to approval of the final development plan/plat for this filing. Perimeter Screening Fence: The developer will provide a 6' solid wood-perimeter fencing with 2 foot by 2 foot brick posts at property corners and not less than 100 feet on center on the west and east property lines and on the property lines adjacent to West 53rd Avenue and West 54th Avenue. The finished side must face the street or outside of these fences. Fencing must be installed by the developer prior to receiving a certificate of occupancy for any lot adjacent to the fence. Fencing for the rear property lines that are adjacent to the open space Tract C will be limited to a 3-rail open fence. This fence should also be provided for the property lines STAFF REPORT PAGE 11. requirement. These lots are 5000 square feet in size and have a 50-foot frontage. They are located in Block 3, on the west side of Owens Street. Setbacks and Development Standards: The following development standards are proposed for this filing. Standard Lots Maximum lot coverage 35% Ranch Model coverage 40% Minimum lot frontage 66 ft Maximum building height 35 ft Setbacks: Front 18.5 ft Side 7.5 ft Rear 10 ft Affordable Housing Lots Maximum lot coverage 30% Minimum lot frontage 50 ft Maximum building height 35 ft Setbacks: Front 18 ft Side 5 ft Rear 10 ft (Side setbacks adjacent to streets are considered as front setbacks and are required to be 18.5 feet for standard lots and 18 feet for affordable lots.) Ranch Models - The developer has requested that the PUD establish the maximum lot coverage for ranch models in Skyline Estates Filing No. 2 at 40%. Section 4.10.2 of the Land Development Code allows the Planning Commission and City Council to modify the maximum lot coverage for ranch models as part of the PUD approval. Elevations: Melody Homes will be constructing their Summit Series in this filing. All dwellings in the project will meet or exceed the Residential Architecture Standards of Section 6.6.2 and 6.6.3 of the Land Development Code. Examples of the type of'homes built by the applicant will be presented to the Planning Commission and City Council as part of the preliminary development plan. Piping of the existing irrigation ditch: The Juchem Ditch runs through the southeast quarter of the site. The developer will be required to pipe the ditch as it runs through the property and provide an easement (Tract H) for the piping between lots 5 Et 6, Block 4. All work on this ditch will have to be approved by the Juchem Ditch Company. Open Space Tracts: Included in the proposed subdivision is 2.90 acres of open space. Of that amount 2.03 acres will buffer the future industrial development on the south of West 53`d Avenue. These landscaped parcels are located at the end of each residential STAFF REPORT PAGE 10. Ridge Road is also classified as a collector street on the city's transportation Plan. The Arvada street cross section for a major collector calls for a 36 foot flowline to flowline width, a 5 foot detached sidewalk, and a 8 foot landscape strip between the back of the curb and the sidewalk. However, the City of Wheat Ridge has indicated that the design of Ridge Road is subject to the requirements of their adopted Streetscape and Architectural Design Manual. Wheat Ridge states that "Ridge Road improvements may include: detached sidewalks, associated tree lawns with turf, irrigation and approved street trees". Wheat Ridge may require the developer to escrow funds to be held for additional street amenities to be added by the City for an anticipated future streetscape project. The developer must make improvement to Ridge Road as required by The City of Wheat Ridge. Since Skyline Filing 2 and the proposed Filing 3, located in the City of Wheat Ridge, will be neighboring developments in two different cities, with common road connections and different street standards, the City of Arvada is recommending that the local street sections conform to those in Skyline Estates Filing No. 1. This will require right-of-way dedications of 50 feet for all local streets, a 32 foot flowline to flowline width, and a 4 foot detached sidewalk with a 4 foot landscape strip. This cross section is shown in the City's Comprehensive Plan. If this design is used, the streets in Arvada and Wheat Ridge will match. The developer indicates that the City of Wheat Ridge is in agreement with the design previously used in Skyline Estates. With regard to the connection of Oak Street to Ridge Road, if Parfet Street from Skyline Filing 2, in Arvada and Nelson Street in Skyline Filing 3, in Wheat Ridge are connected to Ridge Road, it will not be necessary for the developer to connect Oak Street to Ridge Road. Lots: The seventy single-family lots in Skyline Estates will range in size from 6,930 square feet to 12,606 square feet in size, with the average lot size being 7,405 square feet. Lots in Skyline Estates Filing 1 ranged in size from 6,270 square feet to 15,066 square feet, with the average being 8,949. Affordable Housing: Section 6.10 of the Land development Code requires a developer to provide at least 10% of the lots in a development as "small Lots" - lots that are less than 6,000 square feet in size. The intent is to provide a greater supply of new single-family housing on small lots for individuals and families seeking relatively affordable housing in the City of Arvada. The developer is required by Section 6.10.3 of the Code to provide from 10% to 15% of the lots in the development as small lots. In the case of Skyline Estates Filing 2, the developer proposed to provide 7 lots or 10% of the lots, to meet this STAFF REPORT PAGE 9. LAND USE BREAKDOWN Single Family Residential = 17.30 acres Open Space = 2.90 acres Industrial = 5.58 acres Total 25.78 acres Access and circulation: Primary access to the second filing of Skyline Estates will be provided by extending Parfet Street south from West 54th Avenue to Ridge Road. In addition Oak Court and Oak Street will connect to Ridge Road. Parfet Street is on the City's Transportation Plan and on the Ridge Home Property Plan as a collector street. Parfet Street is the only street in the area that will provide north- south continuity from 1-70 Frontage Road to West 58th Avenue. In addition, this connection will provide the best access to the industrial area between Ridge Road and the residential development. Unfortunately, there are two extenuating circumstances that affect the connection of Parfet Street to Ridge Road. One, the land where the connection must be made is in the City of Wheat Ridge. And two, the property is under private ownership and the extension of the street will have a negative impact on the existing house and accessory structures on the site. City Staff still believes that Parfet Street, through the planned industrial portion of the development, should be constructed as part of the municipal improvements for Skyline Estates Filing No. 2. When constructed, it should line up with existing Parfet Street south of Ridge Road. All reasonable effort shall be made by the developer to acquire the necessary right-of- way and the developer shall pay its proportional share of the cost for such right-of-way acquisition and its proportional share of the cost of construction of the connection of Parfet Street to Ridge Road. The developer's position is that if the City wants Parfet Street to connect to Ridge Road, it is the City's responsibility to obtain the right-of-way for the connection. However, the City takes the position that it is the developer's responsibility as part of this development, due to the fact that a significant portion of the need for the extension and impact on infrastructure is attributed the Skyline residential development. If this right-of-way is not obtained now and dedicated as part of this development, it wilt place a burden on the developer of the industrial property, which will make the site less desirable for development. In addition, the extension of Parfet Street will lessen the impact of traffic from the industrial area on the residential development to the north. STAFF REPORT PAGE 8. 1. The proposal is consistent with the Arvada Comprehensive Plan, or reflects conditions that have changed since the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposal is consistent with the previously approved amended Outline Development Plan. 3. The PUD addresses a unique situation, confers a substantial benefit to the City, or incorporates creative site design such that it achieves the purposes set out in Section 4.10.1 of the Land Development Code and represents an improvement in quality over what could have been accomplished through strict application of the otherwise applicable district or development standards. 4. The PUD complies with all applicable use, development, and design standards set forth in the Land Development Code that are not otherwise modified or waived according to the approved terms of the PUD development plan. 5. The PUD is consistent with and implements the intent of the specific PUD district, and shall comply with all applicable threshold standards and PUD development /design standards set forth in Section 4.10. 6. This PUD is integrated and connected with adjacent development through street connections, sidewalks, trails, and similar features. 7. To the maximum extent feasible, the proposal mitigates any potential significant adverse impacts on adjacent properties or on the general community. 8. Sufficient public safety, transportation, and utility facilities and services are available to serve the subject property, while maintaining sufficient levels of service to existing development. Planning Commission could recommend denial of the request if they find that any of the above criteria are not met. PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW Skyline Estates Filing No. 2 is intended to be an extension of the existing Skyline development, currently under construction to the north of this site. The Plan includes 70 single-family lots and 5.58 acres of industrial park property. Also included in the proposal is 2.90 acres of open space that will buffer the industrial and residential portions of the project. STAFF REPORT PAGE 7. Traffic Generation: The RNL Design Report included a traffic Analysis as a part of the Ridge Home Property Plan. The site of the applicant's request was included in that analysis. The study extended from Kipling Parkway to Ward Road and West 49th Avenue to West 58th Avenue. The study concluded that when total build out of all of the Ridge Home property occurs, the development is expected to generate 18,000 vehicle trips per day. In addition to the RNL Report, a Traffic Impact Analysis was done by Kirkham Michael Consulting Engineers. This study included the intersection of Ridge Road/Parfet Street and West 54th Avenue/Parfet Street and concluded that Skyline Estates Filing No. 2 was "not anticipated to create significant capacity deficiencies with in the study area". The Traffic and Transportation Department has reviewed the applicant's Traffic Study and concurs with the conclusions and recommendations made in the study. It is estimated that the rezoning of Tract D (Skyline Estates Filing No. 2) will generate 1000 trips per day, 700 from the residential portion of the development and 300 from the industrial area. A "trip" is any movement into or out of the site. Posting: Section 3.3.3 Posted Notice of the Land Development Code requires the posting of the property for the rezoning, the Outline Development Plan amendment, and the Preliminary Development Plan and Plat with signs indicating the time, place, and nature of the public hearing, 15 days prior to the hearing date. The applicant will need to present a posting log at the public hearing verifying that this requirement has been satisfied. Written Notification of adjacent Property Owners: Section 3.3.2 Written (Mailed) Notice of the Land Development Code requires that the applicant notify all adjacent property owners in writing of the proposed rezoning, the Outline Development Plan amendment, and the Preliminary Development Plan and Plat of the hearing date before Planning Commission and City Council at least twelve days prior to the meeting date. The applicant must submit an affidavit indicating that this requirement has been met prior to the Planning Commission and City Council hearings. REZONING SUMMARY It is the responsibility of the applicant to justify the requested rezoning. Planning Commission and City Council will need to hear testimony at the public hearing and evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the zoning based upon that testimony. The Planning Commission could recommend approval of the request to rezone the property to PUD-R (Planned Unit Development- Residential - 3.52 units/acre) for 19.90 acres of a 25.78-acre site, if they find the following: STAFF REPORT PAGE 6. 3. The PUD complies with all applicable use, development, and design standards set forth in the Land Development Code that are not otherwise modified or waived according to the approved terms of the PUD development plan. 4. The PUD is consistent with and implements the intent of the specific PUD district, and shall comply with all applicable threshold standards and PUD development /design standards set forth in Section 4.10. 5. This PUD is integrated and connected with adjacent development through street connections, sidewalks, trails, and similar features. 6. To the maximum extent feasible, the proposal mitigates any potential significant adverse impacts on adjacent properties or on the general community. 7. Sufficient public safety, transportation, and utility facilities and services are available to serve the subject property, while maintaining sufficient levels of service to existing development. The Planning Commission could recommend denial of the amended Outline Development Plan, if they find it does not meets any one of the approval criteria as stated above. REZONING REVIEW The applicant is proposing to rezone the property from PUD-1 (Planned Unit Development - Industrial) to PUD-R (Planned Unit Development- Residential - 3.52 units/acre) for 19.90 acres and 5.88 acres will remain as the existing PUN of the 25.78-acre site. Policy Analysis: Conformance to the 1995 Community Character Plan - See review under Outline Development Plan Review, previously in this report. 2. Compatibility with the 1999 Ridge Home Property Plan - See review under Outline Development Plan Review, previously in this report. 3. Compatibility with Adjacent Zoning Districts - The property to the north and east is being developed or will be developed by Melody Homes in the same manner as requested by this zoning. The property to the east contains large lot residential in Wheat Ridge. A greenbelt area will buffer the site from the industrial zoning adjacent to Ridge Road. The Planning Commission and City Council should review the proposed rezoning in relation to the existing and future development in the immediate area to determine compatibility and appropriateness of the proposed rezoning request. STAFF REPORT PAGE 5. contain retail, office and industrial uses that are designed for access by the automobile. In the auto-urban areas roads and parking lots are dominant. 2. Compatibility with the 1999 Ridge Home Property Plan - The Ridge Home Plan indicates that the property should develop as residential, open space and industrial. The Land use indicated on the plan, generally breaks down as follows: USE AND LOCATION PERCENT OF SITE Residential on the north portion of the site 65% Open space near the center of the site 15% Industrial on the south portion of the site 20% The request to amend the Ridge Center Outline Development plan is in conformance with the Ridge Home Property Plan. 3. Compatibility with Adjacent Zoning Districts - The property to be re-zoned from industrial to residential will be combatable with the residential development existing and proposed for the area. To the north of this site is the first filing of Skyline Estates, where 220 single-family lots have been platted. The applicants' request will be an extension of that development. In addition, Melody Homes is currently working with Wheat Ridge to develop a similar project to the east of this site. OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUMMARY The Planning Commission and City Council will need to hear the testimony at the public hearing and evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the request based upon that testimony and its relationship to the codes, regulations and policies of the City of Arvada. The Planning Commission could recommend approval of the amended Outline Development Plan (ODP) if they find the following: 1. The proposal is consistent with the Arvada Comprehensive Plan, or reflects conditions that have changed since the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The PUD addresses a unique situation, confers a substantial benefit to the City, or incorporates creative site design such that it achieves the purposes set out in Section 4. 10.1 of the Land Development Code and represents an improvement in quality over what could have been accomplished through strict application of the otherwise applicable district or development standards. STAFF REPORT PAGE 4. Existing Outline Development Plan includes the following: Open space Residential-low density Office/ industrial park Commercial /office Commercial/ office Residential Medium Density Tract A 16.67 acres Tract B 74.35 acres Tracts C/D 83.41 acres Tract E 47.07 acres Tracts F/G 69.67 acres Tract H 51.60 acres TOTAL 342.77acres The amended Outline Development Plan land uses wilt be as follows: Open space Tract A 16.67 acres Residential-low density Tract B 74.35 acres Office/industrial park Tracts C 57.65 acres Office/ industrial park Tract D 5.88 acres Residential-low density Tract D 19.90 acres Commercial/office Tract E 45.59 acres Commercial/ office Tracts F/G 69.67 acres Residential Medium Density Tract H 53.08 acres TOTAL 342.79acres Policy Analysis: 1. Conformance to the 1995 Comprehensive Land Use Plan - The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, as adopted by Planning Commission on December 5, 1995, and ratified by City Council on April 1, 1996, indicates this area will be developed as "Suburban and Auto-Urban - Industrial Suburban is shown on a small portion of the north portion of the site and the Auto-Urban - Industrial is indicated on the remaining portion of the site. The Suburban District is a combination of residential development and open space. The District permits three types of housing styles; Single Family, generally one house on one lot, Cluster Housing, where houses are grouped together to provide more common open space, and Planned Housing, that can be a mixture of housing types including single family, duplexes townhouses and apartments. The Auto-Urban - Industrial Districts STAFF REPORT PAGE 3. development. The plan proposes the extension of Parfet Street and Oak Street as connections to Ridge Road. Also in attendance, in addition to Scott Bernhardt, representing Melody Homes was Gary Hammond of the Arvada Community Development Department. Concerns expressed by the residents included the following: 1. A desire to have deeper lots on the west side of the development. 2. The type of perimeter fencing for the project. 3. Pedestrian access to West 54th Avenue. 4. The effect development will have on the existing water table. 5. An increase in traffic on Parfet, Ridge Road and Miller Street. 6. Stop signs at key intersection on Ridge road. 7. The impact of noise from industrial operations and the train on the proposed residential development. Environmental Survey: The applicant has had an environmental investigation conducted on the site by Western Environment and Ecology, Inc. They state, "no threatened or endangered species or their habitats were observed on the subject property." The following was determined from the study of the site: 1. No bald eagle or bald eagle nests were observed on the property. 2. The property does not contain any Preble's Meadow Jumping Mouse. 3. There are no Prairie Dog colonies on the site. 4. No habitat for the Ute Ladies' - Tresses Orchid was found on the property. Notification to Owners of Severed Mineral Estates: Section 24-65.5-101 of the Colorado Revised Statutes (C.R.S.), requires that all development applicants notify owners of mineral interests that have been severed from the surface estate of the proposed development of the site. Pursuant to C.R.S. Section 24-65.5-103 the applicant has notified owners of possible mineral interests on the property, at least 30 days prior to the initial public hearing by Planning Commission. AMENDED OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW Melody Homes is requesting approval of an amendment to the Ridge Center Outline Development Plan (ODP) in order to change the land use designation for Tract D from Industrial Park to Residential and Industrial Park for the 26-acre site. The ODP is being amended in order to subdivide 19.90 acres of the property into 70 single-family lots. STAFF REPORT PAGE 2 The Ridge Home Property Plan that was adopted in 1999 also included land uses for development of the 167-acre site, located immediately west of Kipling Parkway and north of Ridge Road. The plan includes 133 acres in the City of Arvada and 34 acres in the City of Wheat Ridge. The development concept for this area incorporates "New Urbanism" for creating a pedestrian-friendly mixed-use district, anchored by a future light rail transit station, adjacent to Kipling Street. The development will provide a balance of land uses, ranging from single and multi-family residential units to flex/industrial space, office and retail uses. SITE ANALYSIS Zoning and Land Use: The site is currently zoned PUD-1 (Planned Unit Development - Industrial). The surrounding area land uses and zonings are as follow: Zoning Land Use North PUD-R/PUD-BPR Residential West A-1 (Agricultural) Wheat Ridge Large lot Residential South A-1 (Agricultural) Wheat Ridge Industrial East A-1 (Agricultural) Wheat Ridge Vacant Water and Sewer: The Valley Water District will provide Water service to the project and the applicants are in the process of annexing to the Clear Creek Sanitation District. Water Rights: The applicant states that there are no water rights associated with the property. Fire Protection: Fire protection will be provided to this site by the Arvada Fire Protection District. The site will be served from station #1, located at 7900 West 57th Avenue and station #2, located at 12195 West 52nd Avenue. Floodplain: The site is not located in the 100-year floodplain. Neighborhood Meeting Summary: A neighborhood meeting was held by the applicant for the proposed development on February 6th, 2002. The meeting was held at the Melody Model Homes for Skyline Filing No. 1, at 10897 West 55th Lane. The plan presented to the 8 neighboring property owners, proposed the development of single-family units on approximately 20 acres of a 26-acre site, south of the existing Skyline Estates w W 6 n i s i I u, . ~ ER U S l N CITY OF ARVADA ~ a o YF W. 54TH A . N / ' Skyline / Filing No cc) ~r / f/ R`OOE ROPO / U t;, a. a P E 5 ROPO R~OGE N OR N at RN Ci ' BURLINGTO F N / f r J f / clly of / . , N p m / / r EI , / WHEAT RIDGE/ BOUNDARY, / f 50TH W Q ~ w 0 0 O U } Y F UU U ~ Skyline Filing 2 02-Z-1 / 02-ODP-1 / 02-PDP-4 vicinity map north-0- J SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 2 OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT REZONING AND PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PLAT NATURE OF REQUEST The developer, Melody Homes, is requesting approval of an amendment to the Ridge Center Outline Development Plan, a rezoning from PUD-1 Planned Unit Development - Industrial) to PUD-R (Planned Unit Development- Residential - 3.52 units/acre) for 19.90 acres of a 25.78 acre site, with 5.88 acres remaining PUD-1, and a Preliminary Development Plan (PDP) and plat for Skyline Estates Filing No. 2. LOCATION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. STAFF REPORT The location of this proposed amendment to the Ridge Center Outline Development Plan, rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Plat is a 26-acre site north of Ridge Road between Oak Street and Parfet Street extended. BACKGROUND This area was annexed into the City in 1985. An Outline Development Plan was also approved at that time for the 342.7 acre Ridge Center site. Several amendments that adjusted residential units on tracts in the plan and changed the height limit for a commercial/ office tract have been approved by the City Council. The City approved the final plat for Skyline Estates Filing No.1, the 220 single-family lots along the north portion of the Ridge Center site, in 1999. A preliminary development plan for Skyline Estates Multifamily, a 229-unit apartment development on Tract H, was approved by City Council on September 24, 2001. The final development plan has been approved administratively by the Community Development Department. z V v' Ltl .ya C u H E H Z W W N 2 H N a x a s E E t LL ~ C LL _C ~ d C j C m F p E z u E F y t O rc¢ G O F u E 0¢ i w W L Q C u J Y C l~ C L v U 3 C v Z c m v a a c W H 3 m z L 0 N C F D a c l9 m a v n V 0 m ~m U~ 9 C D i mE L ? 0 US 1 1 m 3 L o ~ L E N 9 m Er ff° ~'m F ~D W~ o °a z wa n'. m 3 a v a V C 0 0 a a s V u _ t~ C w Ztw° C r I I I ~ i I f i f I Proposed 60' ROW Parfet Street New garage W -Pool with deck," posed Ridge ROW xisting Rid Road Existing Pavement Parfet Street E fisting 50`\ RdW Parfet Str concerted efforts to develop this property have been unsuccessful, despite 17 years of trying. Without extensive and very expensive improvements made to this area by Melody, I fear my industrial property will continue to lie fallow just as it has for the last decade, a decade in which other communities have experienced this region's greatest success in the development of commercial/industrial property. Melody has annexed our property to water and sewer districts so my industrial property can be serviced. They are engineering the entire parcel, including my two (proposed) industrial parcels. Melody Homes will bring utilities and streets to my property and grade my property so that it drains properly. Melody has already made extensive road improvements throughout this area. These early improvements, and those proposed with Skyline II, further benefit my property and make its development into industrial/office use that much more achievable. I saw the development and approval of the Ridge Home Plan as a reasonable plan that provided for the quality development of this area into a mix of land uses. The approval of this plan also presented me with the ability to finally develop my industrial property in this area, something I have been unsuccessful in doing despite a concerted and long-term effort on my part. Some of you may be concerned that my two remaining industrial parcels are "too small" to accept any significant level of industrial development. I can see how you might come to this belief by just looking at a simple land use plan. These are substantial parcels. The smallest is larger than a football field in area, the other nearly as large as three football fields. At Stephany's Chocolates. we can employ as many as 300 people in three shifts in a single story plant of 22,000 square feet. Our lot is approximately 1.25 acres. My Skyline parcels are a large enough area to allow us to build 2 1 /2 Stephany's Chocolates. I have been doing this kind of economic development for decades and would not agree to this Skyline II proposal if I believed that it left me with a compromised industrial property. I respectfully request that you help me succeed in the development of my property consistent with Arvada's own plans for this area by approving our Skyline Filing II proposal. Sincerely, Martin T. Hart cc: D.L. Oyler, President, Melody Homes S. Wilson, VP, Melody Homes Martin T. Hart 2401 East 2nd Avenue, Suite 25o, Denver, CO 802o6 303322'7775; Fax 303-322-2009 martin@mthart.net November 12, 2002 Duane Woodard, Esq.; Chairman, Arvada Planning Commission Members of the Arvada Planning Commission Arvada, Colorado 80001 Re: Skyline Filing II Land Use Application Dear Chairman Woodard and Members of the Commission: A }tVy -ter V I am the owner of property in Arvada comprising the southern half of the proposed Skyline Filing II Community. I currently have an agreement with Melody Homes for their purchase of a portion of this property to extend their very successful Skyline Community. I will retain ownership of that portion of this property zoned for industrial/office use. As a business person who has worked hard to create value and jobs in the City of Arvada, I hope you will give some consideration to my perspectives on the issue of rezoning a portion of my property to allow the construction of new homes by Melody. I understand that the Planning Commission is concerned about the rezoning of a portion of my property from industrial to residential use as outlined in the City's own Comprehensive Plan and the Ridge Home Urban Renewal Plan. As a long-time Arvada businessperson and property owner, I respect that perspective: I have a long personal history of helping build jobs for Arvada. I was one of the original investors when Tony Zarlengo formed the Arvada State Bank. With Gary Roffe and others, I have been an owner of Arvada's own Stephany's Chocolates for nearly 20 years. I am very proud of our very real success in promoting job growth in Arvada; at Stephany's alone, we employ as many as 130 people in a single shift. I understand your valid concerns about the "loss" of potential industrial/commercial property. My experience has been that none of my Skyline property can be developed into industrial, office, or commercial use unless Melody successfully develops the northern portion of the property for residential use. And the sooner Melody completes their work, the sooner my remaining industrial lots can be developed. I recognized this fact some time ago. That is why approached Melody about a partnership that would support the successful development of all of my property. I must rely on Melody Homes to accomplish what I could not do myself (economically) to successfully prepare my industrial property for development. This is a simple fact; my -8- Question 10. What is the explanation of the different industrial acreages in the staff report? Answer On page 1 of the staff report in the first paragraph, it states that 5.88 acres of the site (TRACT D) will be zoned PUD-I. That is the remainder of the 25.78-acre site that will remain zoned PUD-1 if the applicant's request for 19.90 acres of PUD-R zoning is approved. On page 4 of the staff report, in the amended Outline Development Plan chart, there is reference to the same 5.88 acres of TRACT D as office industrial park land use. On page 8 of the staff report, in the third line down there is a reference to 5.58 acres of industrial property. This figure should have been 5.88. However, to more accurately reflect the amount of available industrial property for development, the figure should have been 4.67 acres of industrial property. The difference in the two figures is reflected in the amount of land devoted to road right-of-way in the industrial area of 1.21 acres. In summary the 5.88 acres referenced on page 1 of the staff report refers to the area of the industrial zoning. The 5.88 acres on page 4 of the staff report is the area devoted to the industrial land use by the amended Outline Development Plan. The 5.88 acres includes the area that will be devoted to street right-of-way. The 19.90 acres of residential zoning and land use also include street right-of-way. In addition, in the next sentence it states, "open space of 2.90 acres will buffer the industrial property from the residential portion of the project." The figure of 2.90 is the open space of all of the tracts in the residential portion of the project. Of that, 2.03 acres will actually buffer the residential area from the industrial portion of the development. The additional .87 acres is the total of the tracts of open space, mainly located south of West 54`n Avenue. Additional landscaping will also be provided with future industrial development on the industrial sites. On page 9, the Land Use Chart should read as follows: LAND USE BREAKDOWN Single Family Residential = 17.00 acres Open Space = 2.90 acres Industrial = 5.88 acres Total 25.78 acres -7- Staff recommends that the open space requirement be set at 25% for the industrial zoned area and that this shall be provided in landscaping area at the time of the Preliminary Development Plan. Staff also recommends that the residential open space be set at 10% to be consistent with the standard of 10% in Suburban Character Districts. Question 8. If the plan were approved, would the Commission be able to mitigate any adverse consequences with regard to certain adjacent properties; for example the Witbek property and the issue of the location of their well and the issue of Parfet Street. Answer- Bill Honer, with the Engineering Division, met with the Witbeks on site on Monday November 11 to discuss the improvements on their property. The water well that was mentioned in the previous Planning Commission meeting is south of the southeast corner of a new garage that was attached to the east side of the existing house. This well was drilled this year and is about 40' deep. The location of the well was dictated by a required minimum distance from their existing septic system, which is located in the southwest corner of their property. The attached sketch shows the approximate location of the main improvements on the property, which were taken off of an aerial photo. The locations are approximate, however, it appears that the well and new garage would be outside of the proposed Right-of-Way. The east side of the garage, which has the car door in it, would be about 5 to 10' off the edge of the Right-of- Way. The Witbeks do have an above-ground swimming pool with a deck and fence on the east side of their property which would be in the middle of the Right-of-Way which would have to be removed or relocated if the road was constructed. The existing pavement for Parfet Street to the south of Ridge Road is not centered on the existing Right-of-Way and would have to be relocated to the east, at the time of construction of the road to the north of Ridge Road. This would not further impact the Witbak's property on the north side of Ridge Road. (See attached map) Question 9. Provide more information regarding the traffic on Miller Street and the trucks turning out and into the loading area of the glass plant and how that issue would be addressed. Answer- It has been estimated that this proposal and adjacent land uses will add approximately 260 trips per day on Miller Street. It is the opinion of staff that while an improved truck circulation/loading arrangement is preferred, it is beyond the need generated by this development. While City staff is open to Coors' proposal to realign Miller, nothing in this proposal will preclude that from happening in the future. -6- Answer- Staff Comment: Section 6.4 Open Space of the Land Development Code is one of the design requirements that PUD's must meet unless waived or modified by the approving authority. This is referred to in Sections 3.7.3 Preliminary Development Plan & Rezoning and 4.10 Planned Unit Development (PUD) Zoning Districts which have approval criteria that a PUD "achieve and further the purpose of Sections 5, 6, and 7." Section 6.4, Open Space is a part of the requirements for the approval of a PUD and sets out the amount, type, and purpose of the open space required. The table on page 6-12 provides that industrial and residential uses in a PUD should have 35% open space. This compares to a non- PUD requirement of 10% for residential single family in a suburban district. There is no requirement in this table for a standard industrial district. These provisions were taken from the community character districts of the 1995 Comprehensive Plan and were placed in the Land Development Code for the first time when it was adopted in September 15, 2006. There are a number of errors in this table and staff is proposing modifications to the table as a part of the Land Development Code revisions. For instance, industrial uses in a PUD have always had an open space requirement of 25% rather than 35%. Other examples are the 35% open space requirement in a residential PUD when a non-PUD is only required to have 10%. The 35% residential amount is not referenced anywhere in the community character districts. A 35% requirement for open space for industrial developments is not practical, nor would it encourage industrial uses to locate within Arvada. Similarly a 35% requirement for a non-cluster residential development is not necessarily feasible. The open space requirement for industrial uses is determined at the time of the preliminary development or site plan and calculated by the amount of open space and landscaping on each lot. Typically, the front setback areas, parking lot landscaping, and miscellaneous landscaping adjacent to the building amounts to the 25% desired. In residential developments the open space requirement is determined at either the outline development plan or preliminary development plan, whichever occurs first. Residential open space is typically common open space available to all residents. This differs from common open areas in industrial establishments in that a common area is not needed except for landscaping purposes as the use is for manufacturing and not for active or passive recreation. For the Ridge Home Outline Development Plan, there is not a plan that has modified the 35% requirement. This is because the 35% requirement was adopted only two years ago and this is the first industrial request. All of the other PUD industrial developments within the city have a 25% requirement. -5- amendment to bring the total number of units up to 220 single family units for the first filing of Skyline Estates. This 1.48 acres parcel was added to Skyline Estates due to the realignment of Miller Street. Question 6. What is the City's response to the question regarding tree lawns and alternative ways of creating such areas, landscaping, etc., and what the position might be regarding tree lawns in the future, if the drought continues, and if that position fits our comprehensive plan. Answer- Landscape Architect Staff Comment: The plans include a 4' and an 8' strip between the back of curb and sidewalk. Each is shown with street trees and irrigated turf. The 8' strip is sufficiently wide for a healthy tree planting and for efficient irrigation of turf. However, there are more water conservative designs for an 8' landscape strip than irrigated turf. The 4' strip is too narrow for the tree plantings, since healthy trees in a space that small will damage curb and sidewalk. The developer could move the sidewalk 8'f rom the curb onto a sidewalk easement outside the R.O.W. Or, the trees can be placed behind the sidewalk closer to the house to avoid that problem. Turf spray irrigation in a 4' wide strip is almost impossible to do efficiently. (Though new to this region and untested by the city, underground systems that "weep" into turf root zones are available.) The developer needs to prepare alternative designs: - that minimize (preferably eliminate) irrigated turf - that include shrub beds or groundcover areas using plant material that is native and drought resistant - that include hard surface materials around logical access points, at mailboxes, at residential entrances, etc. - that include non-spray irrigation systems (like drip irrigation). The designer needs to reconsider the design of the narrow planting strips and provide a water conservative design that is an attractive complement to the community and consistent with the theme of the Skyline Estates development. Question 7. Mr. Woodard felt he needed further information with regard to Section 6.4 of the Land Development Code, PUD Zoning District, and the staff report because they seem to be at odds regarding the minimum amount of open space by type and district. He stated there is a requirement of 35% open space in the industrial and residential areas unless modified by another PUD Plan; he wanted to know if there was another PUD plan that did in fact modify the 35% open space requirement. -4- Residential-Low Density Tract B 74.35 acres Open Space Tract A 16.67 acres Office/Industrial Park Tract C/D 83.41 acres Commercial/Office Tract F/G 69.67 acres Ridge State Home Facility Tract E 47.07 acres Residential Medium Density Tract H 51.60 acres Total 342.77 acres Preliminary Development Plan/Preliminary Plat: March 7, 1995 Planning Commission recommended denial of a PDP/PP of 287 lots on 142.6 acres due to concerns regarding compatibility of the development to the area, the street and access design, conformance to the ODP, lack of an innovative design as required by the PUD ordinance, and the lack of an adequate buffer from the soccer and ballfields to the north. March 21, 1995 The applicant was granted a reconsideration in order to revise the plans to address the concerns raised by Planning Commission at the March 7, 1995 hearing. This reconsideration was continued several times in order to allow time for the Ridge Home Land Use and Facilities Plan by RNL consultants to be completed. September 1995 The final draft of the Ridge Home Land Use and Facilities Plan was completed and reviewed by Planning Commission and City Council. May 6, 1996 City Council approved a PDP/PP for 265 single-family lots on 142.6 acres. 1998 ODP Amendment 2 In 1998, City Council approved a second amendment to the Ridge Center ODP for Tract E (Commercial/Office) and a height change rezoning from Building Height Limitation 35H to Building Height Limitation 55H for Tracts E and G (Commercial/Office) in the center. 1998 ODP Amendment 3 In 1998, City Council approved a third amendment to the Ridge Center ODP to transfer a 1.48 acres parcel from Tract E (Commercial/Office) to Tract H (Residential Medium Density), a height change rezoning for this parcel from Building Height Limitation 55H to Building Height Limitation 35H, and a POP -3- Question 5. Provide a timeline on the Ridge Home property itself from the time it was turned over to Urban Renewal from the State and what has happened, and what kind of plans have been approved. Answer- The Ridge Home property was never turned over to Urban Renewal from the State of Colorado. The State Land Board sold the original Skyline Estate property to Continental Homes, who sold it to Melody Homes, the current builder. The remainder of the Ridge Home property is under contract to Rich Schierburg for development. SKYLINE ESTATES HISTORY OF THE SITE 1985 Annexation The City approved an annexation of the 342.7-acre Ridge Center site. 1985 ODP In August of 1985, City Council approved the Ridge Center ODP covering 342.7 acres and providing for mixed-use development of the Ridge State Home and Training Center site. The 1985 ODP proposed the following land uses: Residential-Low Density 74.35 acres Open Space 16.67 acres Office/Industrial Park 83.41 acres Commercial/Office 69.67 acres Ridge State Home Facility 98.67 acres Total 342.7 acres 1985 Zoning The initial zoning of the Ridge Center site in 1985 rezoned 342.7 acres from Jefferson County Exempt to City of Arvada PUD-BPR (Planned Unit Development- Business, Professional, Residential), PUD-1 (Planned Unit Development-Industrial), and PUD-R (Planned Unit Development-Residential) at 3.0 units/acre. 1987 ODP Amendment 1 In 1987, the City Council approved amendments to the Ridge Center ODP that added Tract H to the ODP designating 51.6 acres of the existing Tract E as a new Tract H for medium density residential development (8 units/acre) for a maximum of 413 units and reorientation of some street locations. The 1987 ODP Amendment included the following land uses: -2- Answer- In the approved traffic study for this project it has been estimated that 15% of the traffic generated from this site is going to or coming from the south, in both the near term and in the year 2021. If Parfet Street is not built traffic assigned to Parfet will use Miller Street since it is the closest north-south street allowing access to the Kipling/1-70 area. The traffic generated by this site has been estimated at approximately 700 trips per day from the single family and 300 trips per day from the abutting industrial land to the south. The adjacent land in Wheat Ridge to the east is also a mix of single family and industrial. Traffic from these two land uses has been estimated at 430 and 300 trips per day respectively. Using the distribution of 15% of the traffic from these uses and assigning the trips to Miller Street we estimate that approximately 260 trips per day will be added to Miller Street. In the Ridge Home Renewal traffic impact study it has been estimated that approximately 5300 trips per day will use Miller Street at full build out of the area. If the traffic volume identified above, and assigned to Parfet, is transferred to Miller and added to the build out volume there will be approximately 5560 trips per day on Miller Street. Miller Street is classified as a collector and as such is designed to accommodate up to 8000 trips per day. Therefore the Traffic and Transportation Division has estimated that the impact from this project and the adjacent and similar land uses will have a very minimal impact on Miller Street. Question 4. Are there parcels of land in previous comprehensive plans zoned industrial that have been changed to non-residential uses? What were the changed conditions that justified the rezoning to something other than what the Comprehensive Plan recommended? Provide a list of those changes that have happened since 1999 when the RNL Study was adopted. Answer- The only development to change zoning from PUD- I (industrial) was the Arvada West Town Center (Albertson's) at West 64'h Avenue and Indiana Street. A portion of the Parkway Center Industrial Park was rezoned to commercial based on the following changed conditions: A - The continued residential expansion in western Arvada had increased the need for commercial rather than industrial uses. B - Industrial property in the area had been slow to develop and the switch to commercial development would further the goals and visions of the Comprehensive Plan by "providing employment, service and shopping opportunities in close proximity to newly developed residential areas in the City." The City has received a letter from a property owner concerning industrial development on the property. A copy of the letter is attached for your review. M.E.M.O.R.A.N.D.U.M To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission From: Gary Hammond, Senior Planner Through: Mike Elms, Community Development Director Mike Smith, Planning Manager Date: November 12, 2002 Subject: Skyline Estates Filing No. 2 - Additional Information Requested by Planning Commission At the October 22, 2002 Planning Commission meeting, following the public hearing, Commissioners requested that City Staff provide more information concerning the following questions: Question 1. If the applicant's request is approved, how will it amend the RNL Ridge Home Plan? Answer- It will not amend the RNL Plan. Planning Commission's recommendation should consider whether the applicant's plan meets the existing RNL plan. A copy of the Ridge Home Plan is attached with the area of Skyline Estates Filing 2 outlined. The Ridge Home RNL plan was adopted as part of the 1995 Comprehensive Plan in 1999. The current zoning on the site is not in conformance with the RNL Plan. The Planning Commission and City Council should assess the applicant's request to amend the Outline Development Plan and rezone the property if it is to determined the request is in conformance with the RNL Plan, (i.e., the Comprehensive Plan), or reflects conditions that have changed since its adoption. Question 2. Planning Commission would like additional information on the train usage in the area and clarification from the railroad, if possible. Answer- This line is a spur operated by the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad and serves many industries in Arvada and Golden including, among others, Coors and Conoco. Ed Gallagher, Division Engineer for the BNSFRR in Colorado, has calculated that an average of 8.5 trains travel through this area daily. This represents an average total of movements in both directions. Question 3. Need more information on the traffic impact, including the adjoining property proposed in Wheat Ridge, the Parfet road situation, and the impact on Miller Street. -5- Mrs. Miller stated because of the complex nature of the hearing and the possible need for further information from the staff regarding these issues, especially concerning the RNL Study which some members have not seen and other members have not reviewed in some time, she would suggest a continuance of the hearing. It was moved by Mrs. Miller that 02-ODP-1, 02-Z-1, 02-PDP-4 and 02-PP-4, Skyline Estates Filing No. 2 Outline Development Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Preliminary Development Plan and Plat, located at the NE Corner of Parfet St. & Ridge Rd., be continued to the meeting of November 19, 2002, at the 5:30 Session. DISCUSSION OF MOTION Mrs. Miller felt more information was needed in order to arrive at a decision. She asked the Commission if they had additional questions or requests for more information from staff. Mrs. Bolin wanted to see some information from staff on the RNL Study and requested another copy be sent to her. She wanted additional information on the train usage in the area and clarification from the railroad, if possible. Ms. Myers asked for additional information on the traffic impact, including the adjoining property proposed in Wheat Ridge, the Parfet road situation, and the impact on Miller Street. Mr. McHugh wanted information on changed conditions; if there are parcels of land that we had in previous comprehensive plans zoned industrial and we've changed those - he wanted a list of those changes that have happened since 1999 and the RNL Study was put together. Mrs. Bolin asked for some type of a timeline on the Ridge Home property itself from the time it was turned over to Urban Renewal from the State and what has happened, and what kind of plans have been approved. Mr. Ward stated he would like to have the City respond to his line of questioning regarding tree lawns and alternative ways of creating such areas, landscaping, etc., and what the City's position might be regarding tree lawns in the future, the drought, and if that fits our comprehensive plan. Mr. Woodard felt he needed further information with regard to Section 6.4 of the Land Development Code, PUD Zoning District, and the staff report because they seem to be at odds regarding the minimum amount of open space by type and district. He stated there is a requirement of 35% open space in the industrial and residential areas unless modified by another PUD plan; he wanted to know if there was another PUD plan that did in fact modify the 35% open space requirement. He wanted to know if the plan were approved, would the Commission be able to mitigate any adverse consequences with regard to certain adjacent properties; he made reference to the Witbek property and the issue of the location of their well and the issue of Parfet Street and wanted that addressed. He wanted information regarding the traffic on Miller Street and the trucks turning out and into the loading area of the glass plant and how that issue would be addressed. The following votes were cast on the motion: Those voting Yes: Ward, Bolin, Woodard, McHugh, Miller, Myers. The motion carried. -4- Mr. Ward asked if the applicant would consider other alternatives. Mr. Bernhart stated it was common to propose grass; the liability for other materials could be costly for the homeowner or the association. Mr. Ward asked if the landscape plan only included the front yards. Mr. Bernhart stated yes; most homebuilders only landscape the front yards. Mr. Ward asked if the request was approved, would the applicant be willing to submit a landscape plan that does not include grass in the area between the sidewalk and curb area. Mr. Bernhart stated there are many issues associated with other materials; they would be willing to consider it. Ms. Myers asked what the traffic impact would be considering the entire development. Bob Manwaring stated you would be looking at approximately 1,070 trips per day. Mr. McHugh asked if there was a consensus regarding the Ridge Home Plan between Arvada and Wheat Ridge. Mike Smith stated the Ridge Home Plan was adopted as part of our comprehensive plan. Mr. Woodard asked what the title issues were with Block 5, Lot 1. Mr. Wilson stated staff made a condition stating all title issues must be resolved prior to final approval. Mr. Woodard questioned the amount of industrial property being proposed. Mr. Wilson stated they understood the important of industrial property; he stated once streets are taken out of the 27 acres, you then have a net acreage. He further stated they have tried to meet the standards of the Ridge Home Plan. He felt the proposed industrial parcels were large. Mr. Woodard was concerned about the detention ponds meeting the requirements of open space for the residential, but not for the industrial parcels. Mr. Wilson stated if Oak Street were not necessary that would open a larger parcel. Mr. Woodard requested an Executive Session be called in order to receive legal advice. It was moved by Mrs. Bolin that Planning Commission adjourn to an Executive Session in order to receive legal advice. The following votes were cast on the motion: Those voting Yes: Ward, Bolin, Woodard, McHugh, Miller, Myers. Those absent: Michow. The motion carried. AN EXECUTIVE SESSION WAS CALLED AT 10:02 P.M. The meeting was readjourned at 10:50 P.M. 3- Mr. Bernhart stated one way would be to cap it and rebuild the well; another way would be to realign the road. Mr. McHugh asked if any consideration was given to realigning Parfet. Mr. Bernhart stated the triangle portion is in Wheat Ridge; the physical constraint would be the railroad. Mrs. Bolin asked why Oak Street was off-set. Mr. Bernhart stated if Oak Street was continued, it would be on the Wheat Ridge side. Mrs. Bolin asked why it couldn't be moved to the west. Mr. Bernhart stated it would leave a significant piece of property undevelopable. Mrs. Bolin questioned the number of trains and the use of those trains. Mr. Jacquet stated they do receive product by rail four times a day. Mrs. Bolin questioned 24 trips going down Miller. Bob Manwaring stated there would be approximately 700 trips per day; 15% going south and 20-25% trips per day going down Miller - so you are looking at approximately 140 trips per day with 8% during peak hours. Mr. Woodard referred to the sketch plan brought before Commission and there was some real concern expressed by losing industrial property. Mr. Bernhart stated the plan was designed according to the City's comprehensive plan. Mrs. Miller asked if the original outline development plan meet the comprehensive plan. Mike Smith stated the original plan did show the area as all industrial. Mr. Ward questioned the Valley Water District. Mr. Bernhart stated Valley Water District is a special district and they have an obligation to provide water to certain annexed areas. The residents of Skyline would be paying an additional tax to the district. Mr. Ward inquired about a homeowner's association. Mr. Bernhart stated all the filings will be under one homeowner's association as an umbrella. Mr. Ward questioned the affordable housing issue. Mr. Bernhart explained the criteria for affordable housing and stated they platted lots according to City requirements. Mr. Ward inquired about the proposed tree lawn areas. Mr. Bernhart explained they were proposing that the areas be grass. -2- Mr. Bernhart spoke to Parfet and stated access to the south was an issue between Wheat Ridge, the applicant and the City of Arvada; he stated there would have to be a stop sign at Ridge Rd., but that would not decrease traffic. He further stated the development would generate approximately 24 trips per day at peak times and did not feel it was a significant impact in the area. He felt the connection of Parfet was a policy decision between the City of Wheat Ridge and Arvada and stated they would be willing to contribute their fair share of the cost. Regarding the train, it was his understanding that the train stops once a week and did not feel it did back up traffic. He stated Valley Water District would be providing the water to the development; they are not proposing wells for the project. He spoke to the Coors Plant and stated they are only talking about 24 trips per day and did not feel that would impact the plant. Mr. Steve Wilson, representing Melody Homes, referred to a photo of the Witbek property and how Parfet would go into the property. He stated they have made changes to the plan as requested by Planning Commission, City Council, staff and the neighbors. He further stated they have met all requirements and felt the application benefits the City with regards to the Ridge Home property. There being no one else wishing to speak, the public input portion of the hearing is closed. Ms. Myers asked for clarification on the rezoning from industrial to residential. Mr. Bernhart stated the intent of their specific design was to meet the Ridge Home Plan. Ms. Bolin felt the open space and residential were out of proportion with the Plan. Mr. Bernhart explained how they calculated the open space. Mr. Woodard questioned the open space requirement, if any, in the PUD zoning district; asked how much net open space is required for industrial property. Mike Smith stated under the PUD the Commission does have flexibility. Ms. Myers asked about water availability. Mike Smith explained the restrictions during the drought years and the City's water supply was calculated with the drought years included. Ms. Myers asked if there is any requirement for buffering between industrial and residential. Mike Smith explained the requirements of landscaping and solid walls; also explained the landscape requirements. Ms. Myers questioned the application of Flg. 8 with the City of Wheat Ridge. Mr. Bernhart stated they are planning to go before Wheat Ridge next week. Mrs. Miller asked if the reason for residential was more financially sound than industrial. Mr. Bernhart stated they were following as closely as possible . Mrs. Miller asked how the road would effect the W itbek's well. SUMMARY MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD OCTOBER 22, 2002 J2-ODP-1 SKYLINE=F.LG. NO.2 OUTLINE DEV. PLAN AMEND., NE Comer Parfet & Ridge Rd, 02-Z-1 REZONING,. Skyline Fg. No. 2,'NE Corner 'Parfet & Ridge,-Rd.-,, 02-PDP-4 SKYLINE FLG. NO.'2 P.REL.'DEV..PLAN, NE Corner Parfet & Ridge, Rd. np=pp-d RKYI INF FLr NO 2 PREL.'PLAT. NE Corner Parfet & Ridge Rd. - The public hearing was opened Mr. Woodard entered into the record staff report 02-ODP-2, 02-Z-1, 02-PDP-4, 02-PP-4, dated 10-22-02, posting log and affidavit of mailing. Gary Hammond stated he wanted to revise condition no. 16 to add a sentence at the end of the paragraph to replace the existing last sentence. Mr. Scott Bernhart was present and gave a brief history of Melody Homes; he referred to Skyline Flg. 1 development; he stated in Skyline Flg. 2 they will be offering 11 models of homes. He referred to the sketch plan and stated they have decreased the number of homes and increased the lot sizes since the presentation of the sketch plan; he pointed out the industrial site and stated they have removed the storm detention area from the industrial portion; he further stated they have tried to match the Ridge Home Plan regarding the transition from residential to industrial areas. He stated it was their intention to meet all design criteria of Arvada. He referred to the Ridge Home Master Plan. He handed out a sketch of the depths of the lots (Exhibit 1) to Commission. He spoke to the rezoning and felt they exceeded the R-I zoning district and met the R-L standards. He further spoke to the light industrial proposed. He stated they have provided 14% of the residential area for open space; they are going to be paying a fee in lieu of for park development, and will be paying the school fees; he felt they have met all landscape requirements. He spoke to having three access points off of W. 54'h Ave. He discussed the desire of Wheat Ridge for the applicant to provide the improvements to Ridge Road and explained that this could cause some problems in the configuration of the roadway. He discussed Parfet and the extension going into the City of Wheat Ridge and the property they do not own. Mr. Chuck Stiesmeyer spoke in opposition. He was concerned about the construction of Parfet to 60' wide from the original 30' wide; he was concerned about the speed of the traffic on Parfet; he further stated his concern about Ridge Rd. being improved. He was against the increased density. Ms. Diane Witbek spoke in opposition. She did not want to see Parfet going through; she was concerned about people going over their well with the construction of Parfet. She did not want to see the increase in traffic and the speeders. She felt there were other alternatives. Ms. Dion Dana spoke in opposition. She agreed with the previous speaker; asked if the industrial portion was going to be right up to their fence line. She questioned how water was going to be provided. Mr. Lester Cook spoke in opposition. He was concerned about the water situation and the wells in the area. He wanted to know where the applicant was going to get the water to serve the homes. Mr. Neal Jaquet, representing Coors Co., stated Coors owns property at 50th & Miller. He spoke to the Coors Glass Plant and the truck traffic going into and out of the plant; he was concerned about the additional traffic from the development of the homes. He spoke to their proposal of acquiring additional property in order to reconfigure Miller St. and creating a truck court adjacent to the plant. Ms. Diane W itbek stated the train stops every weekend at the bottle plant and is there for a minimum of 30 minutes; this causes traffic backups. -11- 21. RIDGE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS. The north half of Ridge Road located in the City of Wheat Ridge must be constructed at the time other public improvements are installed for Skyline estates Filing No. 2. Ridge Road improvements shall include curb, gutter, detached walk, bike lanes, and the open channel required by the Columbine Basin Study. 22. DETACHED SIDEWALK AND LANDSCAPING. The developer shall provide, as part of the final development plan, a landscape plan for the area between the detached sidewalk and the curb and gutter for local streets in Skyline Estates Filing No. 2. This plan shall prevent water from flowing into the gutter or onto the sidewalk. If a water-conserving plan is not feasible or approved, the developer shall provide a plan with 5-foot wide attached sidewalks on local streets in the subdivision. 23. LOT ELIMINATION. That Lot 1, Block 4, southern most lot on the eastern edge of this subdivision, as shown on the colored rendering entitled "Skyline Estates Filing No. 2", be removed to create a contiguous' open space with the parcel to the east. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: 1. The subdivision is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The subdivision is consistent with and implements the intent of the specific zoning district in which it is located. 3. The general layout of lots, roads, driveways, utilities, drainage facilities, and other services within the proposed subdivision is designed in a way that minimizes the amount of land disturbance, maximizes the amount of open space development, preserves existing trees/vegetation and riparian areas, protects critical wildlife habitat, and otherwise accomplishes the purposes and intent of the Land Development Code. 4. The subdivision complies with all applicable use, development, and design standards set forth in Article 6 and Article 7 of the Land Development Code that have not otherwise been modified or waived. Applicants shall avoid creating lots or patterns of lots in the subdivision that will make compliance with such development and design standards difficult or infeasible. 5. The subdivision complies with all applicable regulations, standards, requirements, or plans of the federal or state governments and other relevant jurisdictions, including but not limited to wetlands, water quality, erosion control, and wastewater regulations. 6. The subdivision will not result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment, including air, water, noise, storm water management, wildlife, and vegetation, or such impacts will be substantially mitigated. 7. The subdivision will not result in significant adverse impacts on adjacent properties, or such impacts will be substantially mitigated. 8. Adequate and sufficient public safety, transportation, utility facilities and services, recreation facilities, parks, and schools are available to serve the subject property, while maintaining sufficient levels of service to existing development. 9. As applicable, the proposed phasing plan for development of the subdivision is rational in terms of available infrastructure capacity. The following votes were cast on the motion: Those voting Yes: Ward, Bolin, Michow, Woodard, McHugh, Miller, Myers. The motion carried. -10- 10. OPEN SPACE LANDSCAPING. The developer intends to plant a variety of evergreen and deciduous trees, shrubs and ground cover in the open space tracts as shown on the landscaping plan. Landscaping for these areas must be installed by the developer prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for any lot adjacent to the tract. However, due to the current drought conditions, escrow funds are being required in the amount of 110% of the installation cost for the landscaping. The developer must meet the current policy in effect at the time a certificate of occupancy is requested. 11. OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE. The Skyline Estates Homeowners Association must maintain the 2.03 acres of landscaped open space planned for the subdivision, in perpetuity. 12. SCREENING FENCE. The developer must provide a 6' solid wood-screening fence with brick posts on the west and east property lines and on the property lines adjacent to West 53rd Avenue and West 54th Avenue, with the finished side facing the street or outside of these fences. Screen fencing must be installed by the developer prior to receiving a certificate of occupancy for any lot adjacent to the fence. In addition, fencing for the individual lots must be in conformance with the fencing plan approved as part of the Skyline Estates Filing No. 2 development plan. 13. FIRE DISTRICT COMMENTS. The developer should be aware of the comments received from the Arvada Fire Protection District in relationship to development of the property. 14. FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT AND FINAL CONSTRUCTION PLANS. The final drainage report and the final construction plans for utilities in the subdivision must be approved by the City Engineer prior to approval of the final plat by the Community Development Director. 15. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ESCROW. The developer must comply with the requirements of Article V, Chapter 27 of the Municipal Code, which includes requirements for escrowing for public improvements and street restoration in developments. 16. PARFET STREET EXTENSION. Right-of-way for Parfet Street to Ridge Road must be acquired and Parfet Street constructed as part of the residential portion of Skyline Estates Filing 2. All reasonable effort shall be made by the developer to acquire the necessary right-of-way and the developer shall pay its proportional share of the cost for such right-of-way acquisition and its proportional share of the construction of the connection of Parfet Street to Ridge Road. When constructed, it should be aligned with existing Parfet Street south of Ridge Road. This alignment, including the alignment on the south side of Ridge Road, must be shown on the construction plans for Skyline Estates Filing 2. The developer shall pay its proportional share of the cost for design and construction of Parfet Street. In the event of the developer's failure to secure the right-of-way for Parfet Street, the developers' proportional share of the costs related to right-of-way acquisition, design and construction of Parfet Street shall be escrowed prior to approval of the final development plan by the Community Development Department. 17. OAK STREET EXTENSION. If Parfet Street from Skyline Estates Filing 2 in Arvada and Nelson Street in Skyline Estates Filing 3 in Wheat Ridge are connected to Ridge Road, it will not be necessary for the developer to connect Oak Street to Ridge Road. 18. COMMUNITY TRAIL ALONG RIDGE ROAD. A community trail is required along Ridge Road, which consists of 6.5' wide detached off-street trail and parallel on-street trail. The developer will be required to build the community trails as part of the municipal improvements along Ridge Road. 19. ENCROACHMENTS. The preliminary development plan indicates that there are several by the neighboring property owner. The developer must address the encroachments into Block 5 of the area for industrial development and for the extension of Parfet Street right-of-way. To the extent that they involve land to be dedicated to the City, the encroachment must be removed prior to dedication. The City will not accept dedication of land that involves a possession/title dispute. This issue must be resolved prior to application of a Final Development Plan. 20. SUBDIVIDER'S/DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. The developer must sign a Subdivider's/ Development Agreement prior to approval of the final plat by the Community Development Director. 9- MAIN MOTION DISCUSSION: Mrs. Bolin felt they developer has come up with a workable plan and thought it would be a successful development. Mr. Ward stated he would not be supporting the motion because he felt as the application stands does not adequately support the reduction of irrigation water waste that is required in this region both now and far into the future. Mr. Woodard stated he would be supporting the motion. He stated this has been a difficult site with encroachment issues and felt the area would be a long time in developing. He was very satisfied with the good will of Melody Homes taking care of the encroachments that appear on the preliminary development plan and preliminary plat as well as dealing with the landscaping and Ridge Rd. improvements. He felt this rezoning and the extension of Parfet St. to the south to Ridge Rd. is key tc the development both in the City and in Wheat Ridge. The following votes were cast on the motion: Those voting Yes: Bolin, Woodard, McHugh, Miller, Myers. Those voting No.: Ward. The motion carried. It was moved by Mrs. Miller that 02-PP-4, Skyline Estates Filing No. 2 Preliminary Plat, located at the NE Corner of Parfet St. & Ridge Rd., be recommended to City for approval subject to the following conditions: 1. LAND DEDICATION. The developer is required to pay a land dedication fee in accordance with Section 7.11.5 of the Land Development Code. For this development the city will be requiring payment of a fee equal to a land area of 1.98 acres at its current market value, in lieu of dedicating property. This fee must be paid prior to approval of a final development plan/plat on the site. 2. PARK DEVELOPMENT FEE. The developer shall pay a per unit park development fee prior to approval of the final development plan/plat. This fee is currently $1043.81 per single-family dwelling unit or $73,067 for the filing. 3. TREE MITIGATION. The developer will be required to replace 234.5 caliper inches of live trees that are planned for removal from the property, on a one-inch to one-inch ratio. 4. SCHOOL LAND DEDICATION. The developer shall pay a school land dedication fee in accordance with Section 7.12.4 of the Land Development Code, in lieu of dedication of land, to the city prior to approval of the final plat for Skyline Estates Filing No. 2. 5. ELEVATIONS. All dwellings in the project shall meet or exceed the Residential Architecture Standards of Section 6.6.2 and 6.6.3 of the Land Development Code. 6. RANCH MODELS. Ranch models in Skyline Estates Filing No. 2 will be permitted to have a maximum lot coverage of 40%. 7. AFFORDABLE HOUSING. The developer must provide seven affordable housing- small lots in accordance with Section 6.10 of the Land development Code for his share of the affordable housing requirement. These lots measure 50 X 100 feet, or 5,000 square feet in size. 8. PIPING OF THE IRRIGATION DITCH. The developer must pipe and provide an easement for the Juchem Ditch as it runs through the site. 9. RESIDENTIAL LANDSCAPING. The developer must provide deciduous street trees between the detached sidewalk and the curb as shown on the Landscaping Plan, in conformance to Section 6.5.3 of the Land Development Code. -8- DISCUSSION OF MOTION: Mrs. Miller referred to the corrections regarding Sheet 1 of 61 and Sheet 4 of 61 which eliminates the references to setbacks in the PUD-I district, including the language on the preliminary plat. Mrs. Bolin offered an amendment to another condition to read: 23. That Lot 1, Block 4, southern most lot on the eastern edge of this subdivision, as shown on the colored rendering entitled "Skyline Estates Filing No. 2", be removed to create a contiguous open space with the parcel to the east. Mrs. Miller accepted the amendment. Mr. McHugh felt the rezoning would assist in the redevelopment of the industrial area with sufficient transition from industrial to residential areas. Mr. Ward offered an amendment to swap Lots 1 & 2 on Block 1 for like amount of open space in Block 2 in order to provide more equity to the residents of these deep lot homes as far as open space buffering is concerned between the residential and industrial. Mrs. Miller asked for discussion. Mr. Woodard asked for a motion from Mr. Ward. Mr. Ward withdrew the request for a friendly amendment It was moved by Mr. Ward that Lots 1 and 2 of Block 1 be placed immediately south of Lots 1 and 20 of Block 2 in exchange for a like amount of open space from Block 2 back to Lot 1 in order to provide more equity in open space buffering between residential and industrial. DISCUSSION OF MOTION: Ms. Michow stated should would not be supporting the amendment because she liked the larger open spaces in the central portion of the subdivision and she was not inclined to redesigning their open space at this point. She felt the more useful open space is better than less usable open space on the perimeters of the development. Mr. McHugh stated he agreed with Ms. Michow. He further stated that although he would like to see a larger buffer between the industrial and the residential, he felt there was a usability factor that should be considered. Ms. Myers stated she would not be in support of the motion; stated it was not just open space, but that is also the area that is going to be used for water detention. She felt breaking that area up would lose the continuity of the site. Mr. Woodard stated he would not be supporting the motion for the reasons stated. He felt it was important when you consider the gradient of that area and the needed detention. The following votes were cast on the motion: Those voting Yes: Ward, Woodard. Those voting No: Bolin, Michow, McHugh, Miller, Myers. The motion did not carry. -7- 18. COMMUNITY TRAIL ALONG RIDGE ROAD. A community trail is required along Ridge Road, which consists of 6.5' wide detached off-street trail and parallel on-street trail. The developer will be required to build the community trails as part of the municipal improvements along Ridge Road. 19. ENCROACHMENTS. The preliminary development plan indicates that there are several by the neighboring property owner. The developer must address the encroachments into Block 5 of the area for industrial development and for the extension of Parfet Street right-of-way. To the extent that they involve land to be dedicated to the City, the encroachment must be removed prior to dedication. The City will not accept dedication of land that involves a possession/title dispute. This issue must be resolved prior to application of a Final Development Plan. 20. SUBDIVIDER'S/DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. The developer must sign a Subdivider's/ Development Agreement prior to approval of the final plat by the Community Development Director. 21. RIDGE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS. The north half of Ridge Road located in the City of Wheat Ridge must be constructed at the time other public improvements are installed for Skyline estates Filing No. 2. Ridge Road improvements shall include curb, gutter, detached walk, bike lanes, and the open channel required by the Columbine Basin Study. 22. DETACHED SIDEWALK AND LANDSCAPING. The developer shall provide, as part of the final development plan, a landscape plan for the area between the detached sidewalk and the curb and gutter for local streets in Skyline Estates Filing No. 2. This plan shall prevent water from flowing into the gutter or onto the sidewalk. If a water-conserving plan is not feasible or approved, the developer shall provide a plan with 5-foot wide attached sidewalks on local streets in the subdivision. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: 1. The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan or reflects conditions that have changed since the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposal is consistent with any previously approved amended Outline Development Plan. 3. The PUD addresses a unique situation, confers a substantial benefit to the City, or incorporates creative site design such that it achieves the purposes set out in §4.10.1 and represents an improvement in quality over what could have been accomplished through strict application of the otherwise applicable district or development standards. This may include but is not limited to improvements in open space provision and access; environmental protection; tree/vegetation preservation; efficient provision of streets, roads, and other utilities and services; or increased choice of living and housing environments. 4. The PUD complies with all applicable use, development, and design standards set forth in the Land Development Code that are not otherwise modified or waived according to the approved terms of the PUD development plan. 5. The PUD is consistent with and implements the intent of the specific PUD district, and shall comply with all applicable threshold standards and PUD development/design standards set forth in §4.10 of the Land Development Code. 6. The PUD is integrated and connected with adjacent development through street connections, sidewalks, trails, and similar features. 7. To the maximum extent feasible, the proposal mitigates any potential significant adverse impacts on adjacent properties or on the general community. 8. Sufficient public safety, transportation, and utility facilities and services are available to serve the subject property, while maintaining sufficient levels of service to existing development. 9. The same development could not be accomplished through the use of other techniques, such as height exceptions, variances, or minor modifications. -6- 7. AFFORDABLE HOUSING. The developer must provide seven affordable housing- small lots in accordance with Section 6.10 of the Land development Code for his share of the affordable housing requirement. These lots measure 50 X 100 feet, or 5,000 square feet in size. 8. PIPING OF THE IRRIGATION DITCH. The developer must pipe and provide an easement for the Juchem Ditch as it runs through the site. 9. RESIDENTIAL LANDSCAPING. The developer must provide deciduous street trees between the detached sidewalk and the curb as shown on the Landscaping Plan, in conformance to Section 6.5.3 of the Land Development Code. 10. OPEN SPACE LANDSCAPING. The developer intends to plant a variety of evergreen and deciduous trees, shrubs and ground cover in the open space tracts as shown on the landscaping plan. Landscaping for these areas must be installed by the developer prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for any lot adjacent to the tract. However, due to the current drought conditions, escrow funds are being required in the amount of 110% of the installation cost for the landscaping. The developer must meet the current policy in effect at the time a certificate of occupancy is requested. 11. OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE. The Skyline Estates Homeowners Association must maintain the 2.03 acres of landscaped open space planned for the subdivision, in perpetuity. 12. SCREENING FENCE. The developer must provide a 6' solid wood-screening fence with brick posts on the west and east property lines and on the property lines adjacent to West 53rd Avenue and West 54th Avenue, with the finished side facing the street or outside of these fences. Screen fencing must be installed by the developer prior to receiving a certificate of occupancy for any lot adjacent to the fence. In addition, fencing for the individual lots must be in conformance with the fencing plan approved as part of the Skyline Estates Filing No. 2 development plan. 13. FIRE DISTRICT COMMENTS. The developer should be aware of the comments received from the Arvada Fire Protection District in relationship to development of the property. 14. FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT AND FINAL CONSTRUCTION PLANS. The final drainage report and the final construction plans for utilities in the subdivision must be approved by the City Engineer prior to approval of the final plat by the Community Development Director. 15. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ESCROW. The developer must comply with the requirements of Article V, Chapter 27 of the Municipal Code, which includes requirements for escrowing for public improvements and street restoration in developments. 16. PARFET STREET EXTENSION. Right-of-way for Parfet Street to Ridge Road must be acquired and Parfet Street constructed as part of the residential portion of Skyline Estates Filing 2. All reasonable effort shall be made by the developer to acquire the necessary right-of-way and the developer shall pay its proportional share of the cost for such right-of-way acquisition and its proportional share of the construction of the connection of Parfet Street to Ridge Road. When constructed, it should be aligned with existing Parfet Street south of Ridge Road. This alignment, including the alignment on the south side of Ridge Road, must be shown on the construction plans for Skyline Estates Filing 2. The developer shall pay its proportional share of the cost for design and construction of Parfet Street. In the event of the developer's failure to secure the right-of-way for Parfet Street, the developers' proportional share of the costs related to right-of-way acquisition, design and construction of Parfet Street shall be escrowed prior to approval of the final development plan by the Community Development Department. 17. OAK STREET EXTENSION. If Parfet Street from Skyline Estates Filing 2 in Arvada and Nelson Street in Skyline Estates Filing 3 in Wheat Ridge are connected to Ridge Road, it will not be necessary for the developer to connect Oak Street to Ridge Road. -5- 4. The PUD complies with all applicable use, development, and design standards set forth in the Land Development Code that are not otherwise modified or waived according to the approved terms of the PUD development plan. 5. The PUD is consistent with and implements the intent of the specific PUD district, and shall comply with all applicable threshold standards and PUD development /design standards set forth in Section 4.10. 6. This PUD is integrated and connected with adjacent development through street connections, sidewalks, trails, and similar features. 7. To the maximum extent feasible, the proposal mitigates any potential significant adverse impacts on adjacent properties or on the general community. 8. Sufficient public safety, transportation, and utility facilities and services are available to serve the subject property, while maintaining sufficient levels of service to existing development. DISCUSSION OF MOTION: Mrs. Miller stated felt that we have the same situation of unusable industrial land in this area as we did at 64`" & Indiana; she felt the improvements will enhance the industrial area. Mrs. Bolin asked for an amendment that the density be reduced to 3.47 un/ac. Mrs. Miller accepted the amendment. The following votes were cast on the motion: Those voting Yes: Ward, Bolin, Michow, Woodard, McHugh, Miller, Myers. The motion carried. It was moved by Mrs. Miller that 02-PDP-4, Skyline Filing No. 2 Preliminary Development Plan, located at the NE Corner of Parfet St. & Ridge Rd., be recommended to City Council for approval subject to the following conditions: 1. LAND DEDICATION. The developer is required to pay a land dedication fee in accordance with Section 7.11.5 of the Land Development Code. For this development the city will be requiring payment of a fee equal to a land area of 1.98 acres at its current market value, in lieu of dedicating property. This fee must be paid prior to approval of a final development plan/plat on the site. 2. PARK DEVELOPMENT FEE. The developer shall pay a per unit park development fee prior to approval of the final development plan/plat. This fee is currently $1043.81 per single-family dwelling unit or $73,067 for the filing. 3. TREE MITIGATION. The developer will be required to replace 234.5 caliper inches of live trees that are planned for removal from the property, on a one-inch to one-inch ratio. 4. SCHOOL LAND DEDICATION. The developer shall pay a school land dedication fee in accordance with Section 7.12.4 of the Land Development Code, in lieu of dedication of land, to the city prior to approval of the final plat for Skyline Estates Filing No. 2. 5. ELEVATIONS. All dwellings in the project shall meet or exceed the Residential Architecture Standards of Section 6.6.2 and 6.6.3 of the Land Development Code. 6. RANCH MODELS. Ranch models in Skyline Estates Filing No. 2 will be permitted to have a maximum lot coverage of 40%. -4- Mr. Wilson he stated if that is required in order to get a recommendation of approval, they would agree. Mr. Woodard stated the revisions made by Mr. Hammond regarding Sheet 1 of 61 and Sheet 4 of 61 which eliminates the references to setbacks in the PUD-1 district be made a part of the record. It was moved by Mrs. Miller that 02-ODP-1 Skyline Filing No. 2 Outline Development Plan Amendment, located at the NE Corner of Parfet St. & Ridge Rd., be recommended to City Council for approval. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: 1. The proposal is consistent with the Arvada Comprehensive Plan, or reflects conditions that have changed since the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The PUD addresses a unique situation, confers a substantial benefit to the City, or incorporates creative site design such that it achieves the purposes set out in Section 4.10.1 of the Land Development Code and represents an improvement in quality over what could have been accomplished through strict application of the otherwise applicable district or development standards. 3. The PUD complies with all applicable use, development, and design standards set forth in the Land Development Code that are not otherwise modified or waived according to the approved terms of the PUD development plan. 4. The PUD is consistent with and implements the intent of the specific PUD district, and shall comply with all applicable threshold standards and PUD development /design standards set forth in Section 4.10. 5. This PUD is integrated and connected with adjacent development through street connections, sidewalks, trails, and similar features. 6. To the maximum extent feasible, the proposal mitigates any potential significant adverse impacts on adjacent properties or on the general community. 7. Sufficient public safety, transportation, and utility facilities and services are available to serve the subject property, while maintaining sufficient levels of service to existing development. The following votes were cast on the motion: Those voting Yes: Ward, Bolin, Michow, Woodard, McHugh, Miller, Myers. The motion carried. It was moved by Mrs. Miller that 02-Z-1, Skyline Filing No. 2 Rezoning from PUD-1 (Planned Unit Development-Industrial) to PUD-R (Planned Unit Development-Residential), 3.47 un/ac, located at the NE Corner of Parfet St. & Ridge Rd., be recommended to City Council for approval. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: 1. The proposal is consistent with the Arvada Comprehensive Plan, or reflects conditions that have changed since the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposal is consistent with the previously approved amended Outline Development Plan. 3. The PUD addresses a unique situation, confers a substantial benefit to the City, or incorporates creative site design such that it achieves the purposes set out in Section 4.10.1 of the Land Development Code and represents an improvement in quality over what could have been accomplished through strict application of the otherwise applicable district or development standards. -3- Ms. Michow questioned the letter from Mr. Martin Hart and asked why he cannot develop his property unless Melody Homes develops the northern portion of the property. Mr. Wilson stated Mr. Hart has been unsuccessful in the past to develop his property; the benefits to his property is outlined in the letter. He further spoke to the improvements Melody Homes is making to the site and how this benefits Mr. Hart's property. Ms. Michow inquired if access would be more direct from Parfet or Miller. Mr. Wilson stated from a regional point of view, Parfet makes the most sense. Mr. McHugh questioned the overlay of the RNL Plan and asked if there was an acre-by-acre comparison. Mr. Wilson stated they scaled it off; they did not do an acre-by-acre comparison. Mr. McHugh felt there was more open space in the RNL Plan. Mr. Wilson stated the RNL Plan it does not include street right-of-way. He felt the open space for the residential and industrial is consistent with the RNL Plan. Mr. McHugh was concerned about the mitigation of the buffering between the industrial property and the large residential lots. Mr. Wilson stated the entire parcel is zoned for industrial use; approximately 2/3 of the site is being proposed for residential rather than industrial. He further stated the industrial will attract 50% more traffic into the site than the residential portion. He stated the industrial uses are going to be limited to light manufacturing type of uses. Ms. Myers asked what the dotted lines represented in the color drawing. Mr. Wilson stated originally they represented the setbacks. Mr. Woodard asked if the applicant was in agreement with the conditions stated in the staff report. Mr. Wilson stated yes. Ms. Michow questioned the RNL Plan and wanted examples of light industrial manufacturing and flex tech. Mike Smith gave an example of the Ojalla development; he stated the proposed lots would accommodate light industrial. Mrs. Bolin referred to the RNL Plan providing a trail corridor between the residential property and the industrial. She stated she did not see a trail. Gary Hammond stated the trail is located on Ridge Rd. Mrs. Bolin asked if the applicant would agree to losing one lot on Block 4 on the east side to make the open space slightly larger. -2- SUMMARY MINUTES OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION NOVEMBER 19, 2002 02-ODP-1 SKYLINE FLG. NO. 2 OUTLINE DEV. PLAN AMEND., NE Corner Parfet & Ridge Rd. 02-Z-1 REZONING,' Skyline Flg. No. 2, NE Corner Parfet & Ridge Rd. 02-PDP-4 'SKYLINE FLG. NO. 2 PREL. DEV. PLAN, NE Corner Parfet & Ridge-Rd. 02-PP-4 SKYLINE FLG. NO.2'PREL. PLAT, NE Corner Parfet & Ridge Rd. This public hearing is continued from the meeting of October 22, 2002 Mr. Woodard entered into the record the memo dated 11-19-02 from Gary Hammond regarding revisions to conditions and additional conditions; the RNL Study (a copy of which can be reviewed in the Community Development Department); and a memo dated 11-12-02 from Gary Hammond regarding additional information requested by Planning Commission. Ms. Michow disclosed that she was absent from the meeting of October 22, 2002, however, she did review the video tape of the meeting. Mr. Woodard stated that Ms. Michow would be able to hear testimony and vote in this hearing. Mr. McHugh asked if the applicant was in agreement with the new conditions proposed this evening Mr. Wilson stated they are in agreement. Mrs. Miller asked what the discount involved for state employees. Mr. Wilson stated Melody Homes has a program that allows a 3% discount for state employees purchasing Melody homes. Mr. Ward wanted clarification of lots west of Parfet - is that in Lot 1. Mr. Wilson stated yes. Mr. Ward asked why the open space so small on lot 1 in comparison to lots 2 and 3. Mr. Wilson stated the distribution of the open space, industrial and residential, is a result of amendments made to the plan based upon comments made during the sketch plan presentation before Commission and Council; we wanted to provide a significantly sized parcel for industrial. He referred to a map showing the overlay of the Ridge Home Plan on the site and how the proposal conforms to that plan. Mr. Ward asked if it was possible to exchange some lots in order to provide more open space for buffer between the industrial and residential lots. Mr. Wilson stated it would be possible to move a lot onto Block 2 open space, but on Block 3 we cannot make the open space any smaller because of the detention pond ion the site. Mr. Ward asked if the applicant had considered a condition prohibiting grass in the area between the back of the curb and sidewalk. Mr. Wilson stated they would be willing to comply with any ordinance or policy of the City relating to ground cover or irrigation regarding tree lawns. SYNOPSIS MINUTES OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION NOVEMBER 19, 2002 02=0DP-1-'SKYLINE`FLG. NO.2 OUTLINE DEV.'PLAN AMEND., NE Corner Parfet &RIdge Rd. 02-Z-1 REZONING, Skyline Fig. No. 2, NE Corner Parfet & Ridge Rd. 02-PDP-4, SKYLINE F.LG. NO.2 PREL'DEV. PLAN,:NE Corner Parfet & Ridge Rd. 02-PP-4 SKYLINE FLG. NO.2'PREL.`P.LAT. NE-Corner Parfet &:Ridge Rd. It was moved by Mrs. Miller that 02-ODP-1 Skyline Filing No. 2 Outline Development Plan Amendment, located at the NE Corner of Parfet St. & Ridge Rd., be recommended to City Council for approval. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: (Pages 5 & 6) The following votes were cast on the motion: Those voting Yes: Ward, Bolin, Michow, Woodard, McHugh, Miller, Myers. The motion carried. It was moved by Mrs. Miller that 02-Z-1, Skyline Filing No. 2 Rezoning from PUD-I (Planned Unit Development-Industrial) to PUD-R (Planned Unit Development-Residential), 3.47 un/ac, located at the NE Corner of Parfet St. & Ridge Rd., be recommended to City Council for approval. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: (Page 8) The following votes were cast on the motion: Those voting Yes: Ward, Bolin, Michow, Woodard, McHugh, Miller, Myers. The motion carried. It was moved by Mrs. Miller that 02-PDP-4, Skyline Filing No. 2 Preliminary Development Plan, located at the NE Corner of Parfet St. & Ridge Rd., be recommended to City Council for approval - subject to the conditions stated in the staff report, Items 1 through 20, Pages 15-18, with additions and modifications. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: (Pages 14 & 15). The following votes were cast on the motion: Those voting Yes: Bolin, Michow, Woodard, McHugh, Miller, Myers. Those voting No: Ward. The motion carried. It was moved by Mrs. Miller that 02-PP-4, Skyline Estates Filing No. 2 Preliminary Plat, located at the NE Corner of Parfet St. & Ridge Rd., be recommended to City Council for approval subject to the conditions stated in the staff report, Items 1 through 20, Pages 15-18, with additions and modifications. This motion is based on the following findings of fact: (Pages 18 & 19). The following votes were cast on the motion: Those voting Yes: Ward, Bolin, Michow, Woodard, McHugh, Miller, Myers. The motion carried. 2- 2. Melody states that they agree with the City of Wheat Ridge that the Parfet/Ridge Road connection is not necessary at this time. Staff Response - Staff understands the applicant's comments. However, we believe that Parfet Street should be connected at this time, as part of Skyline Estates Filing # 2. Therefore, no revision to condition #16 is suggested. 3. Melody Homes continues to propose escrow of funds for improvements related to the Ridge Road cross-section and widening within the City of Wheat Ridge. Melody proposes to escrow funds, in lieu of partial construction of the community trail and other Ridge Road and drainage improvements. The urban drainage channel land will be dedicated by Melody, but should not be built by Melody when considering that this is a regional facility tied to regional uses, not just the Skyline Estates Filing 2 neighborhood. Staff Response - Engineering Staff has checked with Wheat Ridge and they do not have a problem with the applicant escrowing funds for the Ridge Road Improvements. Staff proposes the following amendment to Condition 21. 21. RIDGE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS. The developer shall be required to escrow funds for the construction of the north half of Ridge Road, located in the City of Wheat Ridge, for a distance of 520 feet adjacent to Skyline Estates Filing No. 2, prior to issuance of the first building permit in the subdivision. Ridge Road improvements shall include: curb, gutter, detached walk, bike lanes and the open channel required by the Columbine Basin Study. THIS AMENDED CONDITION HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE UPDATED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Members of City FROM: Gary Hammond, Senior Plan THROUGH: Mike Elms, Director of COmmL Mike Smith, Planning Manager DATE: December 9, 2002 SUBJECT: Skyline Estates Filing 2 Rezoning, Outline Development Plan Amendment, Preliminary Development Plan and Plat. Please find attached a letter from Melody Homes concerning Planning Commission approval of Skyline Estates Filing 2. In addition to six statements in support of their request, Melody Homes has three minor discussion points for City Council to consider. Staff review of these points is as follows: The screening fence for the development on the east and west sides that will be adjacent to existing or proposed single-family development should not include brick columns. Staff Response - Staff concurs with Melody Homes that the perimeter fencing on the east and west side of Skyline Estates Filing 2 does not require brick posts. This fence will be maintained by individual property owners and is considered a rear lot fence, not a perimeter fence. Conditions of approval #12 on page 16 of the Staff Report should be amended to read as follows: 12. SCREENING FENCE. The developer must provide a 6' solid wood-screening fence with brick posts, in conformance with Section 6.5.7. G of the Land Development Code, located on the property lines adjacent to West 53rd Avenue and West 54th Avenue, with the finished side facing the street or outside of these fences. This fencing must be installed by the developer prior to receiving a certificate of occupancy for any lot adjacent to the fence. In addition, fencing for the individual lots must be in conformance with the fencing plan approved as part of the Skyline Estates Filing No. 2 development plan. THIS AMENDED CONDITION HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE UPDATED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Christopher K. Daly, City Attorney Publication Dates: Dec. 5, 2002 December 19. 2002 THENCE NORTH 00813'11" WEST, ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF THE EAST 26 ACRES, A DISTANCE OF 1,318.61 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16; THENCE NORTH 89837'l 1" EAST, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 859.27 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16; THENCE SOUTH 0081311" EAST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1246.20 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 25.78 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. BASIS OF BEARING: BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER, SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AS BEARING N 00013'11 " W. THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER, MONUMENTED BY A 3 1/4" BRASS CAP STAMPED "CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LS 13212". THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER MONUMENTED BY A 2" ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED:"PLS 27601". Section 2. The Official Zoning Maps of the City of Arvada are hereby amended in accordance herewith. Section 3. This ordinance shall be effective fifteen days after publication following final passage. INTRODUCED, READ, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this 2nd day of Dec. .1 2002. PASSED, ADOPTED, AND APPROVED this 16th day ofDecember, 2002. Ken Fellman, Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: 2 Approximate Location: (Parfet Street and Ridge Road) (Skyline Estates Filing No. 2) COUNCIL BILL NO. 02- 049 ORDINANCE N0. 3785 AN ORDINANCE REZONING CERTAIN LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF ARVADA, SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 2, FROM PUD-I (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT- INDUSTRIAL) TO PUD-R (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-RESIDENTIAL), 3.47 UNITS PER ACRE FOR 19.90 ACRES OF A 25.78 ACRE SITE WITH 5.88 ACRES REMAINING PUD-I, AND AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAPS OF THE CITY OF ARVADA, COLORADO, PARFET ST. AND RIDGE RD. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARVADA, COLORADO: Section 1. The following described property is hereby rezoned from City of Arvada PUD-I (Planned Unit Development-Industrial) to City of Arvada PUD-R (Planned Unit Development-Residential), 3.47 units per acre for 19.90 acres of a 25.78 acre site with 5.88 acres remaining PUD-I: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PART OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF ARVADA, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE NORTH 00813'11 " WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 16, A DISTANCE OF 71.25 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF RIDGE ROAD, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE SOUTH 74838'30" WEST, ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 277.09 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16; THENCE SOUTH 89832'35" WEST, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 591.80 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 26 ACRES OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16; City of Arvada Agenda No.: 8.n. Council Agenda Information Sheet Date: December 16, 2002 Item: CB 02-049 An Ordinance Rezoning Certain Land Within the City of Arvada, Skyline Estates Fig. 2, from PUD-1 (Planned Unit Development-Industrial) to PUD-R (Planned Unit Development-Residential), 3.47 un/ac, for 19.90 acres of a 25.78 acre site with 5.88 acres remaining PUD-I, and Amending the Official Zoning Maps of the City of Arvada, Colorado, Parfet & Ridge Rd. Initiated by: Melody Homes, Inc./City of Arvada/Community Development Dept. Financial impact: $N/A Budgeted? N/A Funding Source: N/A Action Proposed: Second Reading and Public Hearing The developer, Melody Homes, is requesting approval of an amendment to the Ridge Center Outline Development Plan, a rezoning from PUD-I Planned Unit Development -Industrial) to PUD- R (Planned Unit Development- Residential - 3.47 units/acre) for 19.90 acres of a 25.78 acre site, with 5.88 acres remaining PUD-I, and a Preliminary Development Plan (PDP) and plat for Skyline Estates Filing No. 2. The developer is requesting approval of an amendment to the Ridge Center Outline Development Plan (ODP) in order to change the land use designation for Tract D from Industrial Park to Residential and Industrial Park for the 26-acre site. The ODP is being amended in order to subdivide 19.90 acres of the property into 70 single-family lots. Skyline Estates Filing No. 2 is intended to be an extension of the existing Skyline development, currently under construction to the north of this site. The Plan includes 70 single-family lots and 5.58 acres of industrial park property. Also included in the proposal is 2.90 acres of open space that will buffer the industrial and residential portions of the project. Planning Commission voted 7-0 in favor. e , ,t Suggested Motion: Moved by: I move that CB 02-049, An Ordinance Rezoning Certain Land Within the City of Arvada, Skyline Estates Fig. 2, from PUD-1 (Planned Unit Development-Industrial) to PUD-R (Planned Unit Development-Residential), 3.47 un/ac, for 19.90 acres of a 25.78 acre site with 5.88 acres remaining PUD-l, and Amending the Official Zoning Maps of the City of Arvada, Colorado, Parfet & Ridge Rd., be (approved on Final Reading, Numbered 3785 and Ordered Published by Title This motion is based on the findings of fact adopted by Planning Commission (if approved) This motion is based on the following findings of fact: (Page 8 of staff report, if denied) YES NO O ABSENT NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Project File Number: 02-ODP-1 / Z-1 / PDP-4 / Preliminary Plat Sent by First Class Mail: November 27, 2002 The City Council for the City of Arvada will hold a public hearing on Monday, December 16, 2002, at 7:30PM or soon thereafter, to consider a Rezoning, Preliminary Development Plan, Outline Development Plan Amendment and Preliminary Plat of approximately 25.78 acres of land, located between Ridge Road and West 54`h Avenue adjacent to the Parfet/Oak street alignment. The Melody Homes request to rezone the property would change the zoning from Planned Unit Development Industrial to both Planned Unit Development Residential (north-19.90 acres) and Planned Unit Development Industrial (south-5.88 acres). The residential designation would have a density of approximately 3.47 dwelling units per acre. In addition, the City Council will consider the applicant's request for approval of a Preliminary Development Plan and Plat to allow for 70 single-family residential homes on lots averaging 7,996 square feet. The Public Hearing will be held in the City Council chambers of the Arvada Municipal Building located at 8101 Ralston Road, Arvada, Colorado. All interested parties may appear at the public hearing for this request and speak on the matter or may file written comments with the Community Development Department no later than 8 days prior to the hearing. Written comments should be addressed to, and any additional information can be obtained from: Community Development Department Arvada Municipal Building 8101 Ralston Road Arvada, Colorado 80001-8101 Telephone: 720-898-7435 The development review process includes a public hearing before *Planning Commission and before City Council and is designed to provide opportunities for citizen involvement and comment. Prior to the public hearings, landowners, immediately adjacent to the subject property are notified of the applicant's request by way of this notice. The City Council is forwarded all written comments received by the specified deadline. *Skyline Filing #2 was approved by the Planning Commission and is scheduled for City Council review at the above date and time. 9WOX AWl3W I I 'ON'JN~lli 53AY,-- 3NR4H5 l+\ 1 E ~ E . 133k15 i1~2~dd U ~ SS ~ , Q4 g 3 Y v I+ a I ~yWRd e . IN 1 3s ' ~ I, ~ R W S O ~ r i WNS I yl? a 0 -S i H V) 1 2 LU V U S_ W LL 604 an 6 nooL 9 Gnu 77,K-t769- EX: Xp3 1310IN WED 11"k Lc(egi m 11 *"N via A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PART OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 16. TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH. RANGE 69 WEST OF. THE 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF ARVADA. COUNTY OF JEFFERSON. STATE OF COLORADO. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE NORTH 0093'11• WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 16, A DISTANCE OF 71.25 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RK*iT-OF-WAY LINE OF RIDGE ROAD, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE SOUTH 7436'30' WEST. ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LIE. A DISTANCE OF 277.09 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16; THENCE SOUTH 8932'35- WEST. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 591.80 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 26 ACRES OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16; THENCE NORTH 00'13'11' WEST. ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF THE EAST 26 ACRES. A DISTANCE OF 1,318.61 FEET TO A PONT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16; THENCE NORTH 8937'11- EAST. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE. A DISTANCE OF 859.27 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SEC71ON 16; THENCE. SOUTH 0093'11- EAST. ALONG SAID EAST LINE. A DISTANCE OF 1246.20 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN TRFASURM DEED RECORDED JUNE 1% 1992 UNDER RECEPTION Na 92069702 CONTAINING 25.78 ACRES. MORE OR LESS. BAST ; OF BEI~aM1r BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE EAST LIE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER. SECTION 16. TOW" 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 67H PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AS BEARING N 0093' 110 K THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER. MONUMENTED BY A 3 1/4- BRASS CAP STAMPED 'CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LS 132120. THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER MONUMENTED BY A 2' ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED: -PLS 27601•. SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 2 'I -1 1 I 1 2 to ~I I L70 MELODY HOMES 32 31 30 I SKYLINE ESTATES _ I LL FILING N0. 1 AMENDED 12 AREA UNDER CONSTRUCTION ~jj x- 115 I r---I I r --1 r ---I I r 12 -1 r l F I I BD o.- - eo 160 s I I 111 1 12 I I I \,3 2 I I I I ORIGINAL S0A(E: 1-00 IL-_J I L---J L---J ( L---J 3 r--1 r---I r---1 r----l II V L-J I F 1 10 1 I I 1 101 1 13 I it 1 2 J L L--J L_--J L---J 7 r---1 I 1 r---I r---1 I I r ----I 1 10 I I 4 J L 1 91 114 ~ 3 12 81 115 I 8 i 5 aY OF L--J L-_-J ARVADA UNITS J l rr -1 r--1 r---1 ®7 r--"1 ® 1 r----l I® e 1 6 - ~ v/ 5 I® a l l 13 ®1 1 I 116 2 < I 1 r - -1 r - - 1 1 r - 6 17 7 SKYL INE ESTATES 1 7 1 1 14 I I 1 I J L _ _ J L 1 1 7 I - -J L _ I ~ 1 3 FILING NO, 3 _ IAL URE RE~ ` tJ L- _J L---J ~ - - L_ PMENT 6 r- -"1 r--1 I r- , L18 -J I I r- 6- 1 9 1 I (City of WheaWdgd _ 6 15 5 J L r , I I L'---J --J I- 0~ - - 13 \ r'~ L--J L --J I 19 1 - - 4 I r--1 r--'1 r- 4-1 L ' 1 r I e J L L--J 7 i l 16 I F 5 5 _ - r L-J s I 20 J I J L -J rr I 1 i 12 - J L-_ 5 r- r--~ r-- --1 2 F - J L_- i L_-J s 4 1 1 17 1 1 1 3 1 1 r ~ 10 r r J 9 J L O 47- 1 MONO 6 1 it _ 1 - - - I - - r - - -T r l es - - OTtl1 I 0 RR o- L L L J r 9 r 1 ~ r y ~ L A11 4 ID I C _ - 1 8 1 1 i 2 - CENIERJNE r L 3 J J L 1 1 p 1 3 I r ~ 1 1 10 I - 1 J L--J L-_ qq - A3 a L---J 7 L 1 J L _ 1 1 L 10 1 ` r r X r _ r - L ~ L 2J J L J L ® I® 2 ( 12 ~ I e I 1 I 9 - I - - - ---1 ' I J L J L ( J r 10 1 ' I r I 200 I . . - r- -I r---- 1 ' DPEN SPACE _ WEN SPACE L- -J L-.J :7{• vv[ ?7-:?Iv I F- 12 L 114 ARTHUR do BARBARA AHO L RECg79094011 r - - - - - - I13 / 112 I L - _ - J - - 111 L-- _J GREGORY R. SKALLA I10 i REC*90047858 L - - - J r-- I Is ® i LESTER IB i I M. CODK L--- -J TRUSTEE r-- REC9 87035269 17 I L.- .J - - - _ r-- a1YW 16 I ARIADA U115 16 - - - J 15 1 FRANCH018 PAUL R L-'-- -'J . KATHRYN L. ARAGON r - - - -1 5300 QUAIL STREET 14 1 WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 3931548SO RE L - J C I- - - - 13 (City of Wheatridge) 1- 12 I L-- -J CHARLES @ JILL RICHARDSON I+ 5220 QUAIL STREET L - _ - WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 RECOF0311078 t INDUSTRIAL \ BLOCK 5 \ LOT 1 I.vsx ® I i 1 ll~.' 53R➢P"~ I 1 I I J INDUSTRIAL 1 BLOCK 5 J zd c I 3 z j r / c>~ a AY F (City of Sam ge) - " RQPD ~i ~VERNON G. &I BOOK 12A7N2A 5 DION I DIANE M. ~ ~ ..mGE PAGE 59O Wx~CK tt,4A~" IRECS870751971 OElEN11'AC OP N SPACE SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. a FUTURE URE PUNNED cPEN SPADE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Project File Number: 02-ODP-1 / Z-1 / PDP-4 / Preliminary Plat Sent by First Class Mail: October 9, 2002 The Planning Commission for the City of Arvada will hold a public hearing on Tuesday. October 22, 2002, at 7:OOPM or soon thereafter, to consider a Rezoning. PreliminarU Development Plan, Outline Development Plan Amendment and Preliminary Plat of approximately 25.78 acres of land, located between Ridge Road and West 54th Avenue adjacent to the Parfet/Oak street alignment. The Melody Homes request to rezone the property would change the zoning from Planned Unit Development Industrial to both Planned Unit Development Residential (north) and Planned Unit Development Industrial (south). The residential designation would have a density of approximately 3.33 dwelline units per acre. In addition, the Planning Commission will consider the applicant's request for approval of a Preliminary Development Plan and Plat to allow for 70 single- family residential homes on lots averaging 7,996 square feet. The Public Hearing will be held in the City Council chambers of the Arvada Municipal Building located at 8101 Ralston Road, Arvada, Colorado. All interested parties may appear at the public hearing for this request and speak on the matter or may file written comments with the Community Development Department no later than 8 days prior to the hearing. Written comments should be addressed to, and any additional information can be obtained from: Community Development Department Arvada Municipal Building 8101 Ralston Road Arvada, Colorado 80001-8101 Telephone: 720-898-7435 The development review process includes a public hearing before Planning Commission and before City Council and is designed to provide opportunities for citizen involvement and comment. Prior to the public hearings, landowners, immediately adjacent to the subject property are notified of the applicant's request by way of this notice. The Planning Commission is forwarded all written comments received by the specified deadline. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PART OF THE SE 1 /4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF ARVADA, COUNTY OF JUTERSON. STATE OF COLORADO. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE NORTH 0093111' WEST. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 16. A DISTANCE OF 71.25 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LIVE OF RIDGE ROAD. SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING THENCE SOUTH 7436'30' WEST. ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE. A DISTANCE OF 277.09 FEET 10 A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16; THENCE SOUTH 8932`35` WEST. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 591.80 FEET 70 A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 26 ACRES OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16: THENCE NORTH 00'13'11- WEST, N.ONG SAID WEST LINE OF THE EAST 26 ACRES, A DISTANCE OF 1.318.61 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LIVE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SEC71ON 16; THENICE NORTH 8937'11- EAST. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE. A DISTANCE OF 839.27 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16; THENCE SOUTH 0093'11- EAST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE. A DISTANCE OF 1246.20 FEET 70 THE POINT OF BEGNVN a EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT POR71ON DESCRIBED IN TREASURER'S DEED RECORDED JUNE 1% 1992 UNDER RECEPTION No. 92069702 CONTAINING 25.78 ACRES, MORE OR LESS BASIS OF BEARN : BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER. SECTION 16. TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH. RANGE 59 wM OF THE 67H PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AS BEARING N 0093' 11- it THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER. MONUMENTED BY A 3 1/4- MASS Qkv STAMPED -CITY OF MEAT RIDGE LS 13212 THE NORTHEAST CORNER DF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER MONUMENTED BY A 2- MI)MINUM CAP STAMPED. 'PLS 27601-. City Council Minutes December 16, 2002 Page 5 The Motion was Approved B. CB02-050 An Ordinance Repealing and Reenacting Chapter 31, Taxation, of the Arvada City Code (Ordinance No. 3783) Mayor Fellman opened the public hearing on CB02-050. Craig Kocian, City Manager, said most of the proposed changes to the tax code are either minor or required to come into compliance with state law. He said this item has been discussed with City Council in a study session. Mayor Fellman closed the public comment portion of the public hearing was closed. Councilmember Anderson moved that CB02-050, An Ordinance Repealing and Reenacting Chapter 31, Taxation, of the Arvada City Code be approved on final reading, numbered 3783 and ordered published by title only. Mayor Fellman said he is proposing three friendly amendments to the motion. He said in Article 11, he would like to change the title of that section to eliminate the word "Utility". In definition No. 46, midway through it refers to "basic local exchange teletypewriter service" and he would like to eliminate the word "teletypewriter". He said the last change is in Section 31-41, Lb. He asked to reword this section so that the first sentence reads "With the exception of carrier access services, and interstate private communications services, and except as otherwise provided by this section for mobile telecommunications services, telecommunication services for all international, interstate, watts/800 services and intrastate telecommunications service originating from or received on telecommunications equipment in the city if the charge for the service is billed to an apparatus, telephone, or account in this city, to a customer location in this city, or to a person residing in the city without regard to where the bill for such services is actually received. Councilmember Anderson accepted the three friendly amendments and said she would amend her motion to publish the ordinance in full. The following votes were cast on the Motion: Those voting Yes: Fellman, Urban, Allard, Anderson, Azari, Smith, Williams The Motion was Approved C. CB02-051 An Ordinance Authorizing a Restated Plan Document for the City of Arvada Retirement Plan (Ordinance No. 3784) Mayor Fellman opened the public hearing on CB02-051. Chris Daly, City Attorney, reviewed this item with City Council. He said some of these changes are mandatory due to tax laws passed since 1994 as well as some cleanup language. He said the one policy change was proposed by the CARP Board and deals with part-time employees who receive only partial credit towards vesting each calendar City Council Minutes December 16, 2002 Page 6 year. He said this ordinance would change so that a part-time employee receives one year's vesting credit for each calendar year they work 1,000 hours. Pete Adler, CARP Board, addressed City Council regarding a vesting question. Mayor Fellman closed the public comment portion of the public hearing. Councilmembers Anderson and Smith expressed concern about part-time employees getting the same benefits as full-time employees. Councilmember Smith verified that there is no financial impact on the city and Mr. Adler said correct. Councilmember Williams expressed his concern that there will be less money in the forfeiture account to redistribute to the full-time employees. Councilmember Allard moved that CB02-051, An Ordinance Authorizing a Restated Plan Document for the City of Arvada Retirement Plan be approved on final reading, numbered 3784 and ordered published by title only. The following votes were cast on the Motion: Those voting Yes: Fellman, Urban, Allard, Anderson, Azari, Smith, Williams The Motion was Approved D. CB02-049 An Ordinance Rezoning Certain Land Within the City of Arvada, Skyline Estates Filing No. 2, from PUD-I (Planned Unit Development-Industrial) to PUD-R (Planned Unit Development- Residential), 3.47 units per acre for 19.90 acres of a 25.78 acre site with 5.88 acres remaining PUD-I, and Amending the Official Zoning Maps of the City of Arvada, Colorado, Parfet St. and Ridge Rd. (Ordinance No. 3785) E. Skyline Estates Flg. 2 Outline Development Plan Amendment, Parfet & Ridge Rd. F. Skyline Estates Flg. 2 Preliminary Development Plan, Parfet & Ridge Rd. G. Skyline Estates Flg. 2 Preliminary Plat, Parfet & Ridge Rd. Mayor Fellman opened the public hearing on C1302-049, the Outline Development Plan Amendment, the Preliminary Development Plan and the Preliminary Plat. Mike Smith, Community Development, stated that the posting log and mailing affidavit have been received and are in order. Mayor Fellman made them a part of the official record. Mayor Fellman swore those in wishing to speak. Scott Bemhart , Melody Homes, the applicant, addressed City Council and reviewed the project. He said there is a total of 212 lots planned, with sixteen of them being addressed City Council Minutes December 16, 2002 Page 7 today in this second filing. Mr. Bemhart discussed the open space. He said they are in agreement with all of the recommendations of the Planning Commission and all of the conditions. Mr. Bemhart raised three discussion points for City Council to consider. Two of the requests have been added to the updated conditions of approval. The third issue deals with Parfet Street and staff feels that it should be connected at this time and staff does not recommend any revision to condition #16. Steve Wilson, Melody Homes, addressed City Council. He asked that City Council make the same findings as the Planning Commission did. Barbara Aho, Wheatridge, asked that the trees on the lots on the west side be kept. Mr. Bemhart addressed the issue of the trees. He said they are on lots 14, 15 and 16, but the majority of trees are on 15 and 16. He said he couldn't commit the company to specifically save those trees, but that they will do what they can to try to grade around them. He said they would actually be mitigating almost 406 caliper inches of trees. Mayor Fellman closed the public comment portion of the public hearing. Mayor Fellman called a five-minute recess. Mayor Fellman reconvened the meeting. Councilmember Anderson said she noticed from the tree inventory that most of the trees are not in good shape, but that she understands Ms. Aho's request. She asked if any of the trees could be saved. Mr. Bemhart said they would make a commitment to try to save some of the trees. He said the on-site engineers determine if that can happen. He said because of the depth of the lot, there is a good chance some of those closest to the rear lot line can be saved. Councilmember Anderson asked if Parfet would be the main entrance and the through street connected with Oak. Mike Smith said correct and there would also be a connection at 54'". He said there is a third filing in Wheat Ridge. Councilmember Smith asked staff what the typical traffic count is to define a collector street and Bob Manwaring said 8000 vehicles per day. He said on a residential street there is typically under 1000. Councilmember Williams asked where traffic will be impacted the greatest. Mr. Manwaring described the distribution patterns. Mr. Williams asked about the traffic light at 581" & Oak. City Council Minutes December 16, 2002 Page 8 Councilmember Azari asked about Parfet and the escrow of funds. He also asked about Filing No. 3 which will be done in Wheat Ridge. Councilmember Azari asked about the seven smaller lots and whether they would be marketed as affordable housing. Mr. Azari said in Filing No. 1 there were different fencing standards applied and asked if they would be applied in this filing. Mr. Bembart reviewed the fencing plan. Councilmember Williams moved that C1302-049, An Ordinance Rezoning Certain Land Within the City of Arvada, Skyline Estates Filing No. 2, from PUD-I (Planned Unit Development-Industrial) to PUD-R (Planned Unit Development-Residential), 3.47 units per acre for 19.90 acres of a 25.78 acre site with 5.88 acres remaining PUD-I, and Amending the Official Zoning Maps of the City of Arvada, Colorado, Parfet St. and Ridge Rd. be approved on final reading, numbered 3785 and ordered published by title only. This motion is based on the findings of fact adopted by the Planning Commission. Councilmember Azari said he has concerns with the connection on the south and negotiations with Wheat Ridge. He said he would hope that the City of Wheat Ridge does integrate their plan with Arvada. Mayor Pro Tern Urban asked if there is any way to create an agreement with Wheat Ridge. Chris Daly, City Attorney, said the city has no control over Wheat Ridge in that regard, but they could certainly urge them. Councilmember Urban asked if some correspondence could at least take place. Councilmember Anderson said City Council should talk to the Wheat Ridge City Council and discuss the countywide transportation plan. The following votes were cast on the Motion: Those voting Yes: Fellman, Urban, Allard, Anderson, Azari, Smith, Williams The Motion was Approved Councilmember Williams moved that Skyline Estates Flg. 2 Outline Development Plan Amendment, Parfet & Ridge Rd. be approved. This motion is based on the findings of fact adopted by the Planning Commission. The following votes were cast on the Motion: Those voting Yes: Fellman, Urban, Allard, Anderson, Azari, Smith, Williams The Motion was Approved Councilmember Williams moved that Skyline Estates Flg. 2 Preliminary Development Plan, Parfet & Ridge Rd. be approved subject to the attached updated conditions of approval. This motion is based on the findings of fact adopted by the Planning Commission. The following votes were cast on the Motion: Those voting Yes: Fellman, Urban, Allard, Anderson, Azari, Smith, Williams City Council Minutes December 16, 2002 Page 9 The Motion was Approved Councilmember Williams moved that Skyline Estates Flg. 2 Preliminary Plat, Parfet & Ridge Rd. be approved subject to the attached updated conditions of approval. This motion is based on the findings of fact adopted by the Planning Commission. The following votes were cast on the Motion: Those voting Yes: Fellman, Urban, Allard, Anderson, Azari, Smith, Williams The Motion was Approved H. Meyer Haunted Attraction Preliminary Development Plan, 13251 W. 64" Ave. City Council Minutes December 16, 2002 Page 10 Mayor Fellman opened the public hearing on Meyer Haunted Attraction Preliminary Development Plan, 13251 W. 64" Ave. Councilmember Smith disclosed that prior to the plan being submitted to the city, the applicants invited Mr. Smith over to their property. He said he has not entered into discussion about this issue since that time and his prior contact does not affect his impartiality. Mayor Fellman also disclosed that he was contacted prior to the plan being submitted to the city. Mike Smith, Community Development, stated that the posting log and mailing affidavit have been received and are in order. Mayor Fellman made them a part of the official record. Mayor Fellman swore those in wishing to speak. Zachay Meyer, 5883 Urban Ct., Arvada, the applicant, addressed City Council and described the project. He reviewed the hours of operation, sound, parking and planned attractions. Those speaking in Support of the Issue: Gene Woods, Arvada AL. Walters, Arvada Dennis Meyer, Arvada Mayor Fellman closed the public comment portion of the public hearing. Councilmember Smith asked Mr. Meyer about his plans to keep the partying of teenagers to a minimum. Mayor Fellman asked if traffic turning onto 64`b becomes a problem, would it be possible to post signs and have them exit a different way. Mr. Meyer said his staff would plan that. Councilmember Anderson moved that Meyer Haunted Attraction Preliminary Development Plan, 1325 L W. 64' Ave. be approved subject to the attached updated conditions of approval. This motion is based on the findings of fact adopted by the Planning Commission. The following votes were cast on the Motion: Those voting Yes: Fellman, Urban, Allard, Anderson, Smith, Williams Those voting No: Azari The Motion was Approved SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 2 _ I 5 ARTHUR k BARBARA AHO L REC97909409D94D1 1 7 114 r - - - - 7 h3 / L - - - r= ---7 112 L - - J GREGORY R. SKALLA RECk90047858 - - J I r- -r h0 6 . p r- I I LESTER B M. COOK . - L- -J TRUSTEE F RECD r - - 1 W 37035269 g a L- -J ti - - - - - - - r- Ow w 7 ARVAOA LIMITS r- -r 16 PAUL R. FRANCHOtS L - - J I KATHRYN L. ARAGON r - - 1 I . 5300 QUAIL STREET 15 WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 REC#93154890 L - - J r- --1 4 I (City of Wheatridge) L - - 13 L- -J CHARLES k JILL RICHARDSON 12 \ 5220 QUAIL STREET L ' ~s acres WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 2 22 - , +JTATIET TI RECmED3110]8 I ~ -I I I ) 2 MELODY HOMES - 36 SKYLINE ESTATES 32 31 30 FILING NO. 1, AMENDED REC I FIIOO835 t 16 AREA UNDER CONSTRUCTION I r--~ L - - J r---I I 15 I I 10 I L.-J 1 L 13 r --r 12 L .-J I® 31 1 13 1 1 L - - -1 L - - J r- -I 1 71 1 q L - - J L - - J 1 51 1 15 1 t 5 5 L - - J L - - J 41 1 17 1 r- - I I 1 I 18 t3 I L - - J L - - J r- --I I- 19 -l 2I 1 1 1® 1 1 1 20® 1 L - - J L - - J (City of Why e~ah'id DANA DION BOOK 2725 PAGE 590 n l 112 L-- J L-..J 1 101 1 +3 1 1- L-.-J gl 14 L - - J L - J I 3 1 1 15 I L - - J L - - J r--r ® 71 16 r-- - r 7 7 L. J , 5 7IXLt~ - J ' I e r 4 l - F20 F- I s l L J _ r-- L2z J I 1 2 L J - 23 I ® 11 L - - - J kvERNON G. @ 0.28 ACRES.~~ DIANE WURACK IREC087075197 I - i i L - - J r---i 10 L _ - J L-9 J r ---I I 3 I L - - J ®7 L - - J L 6- J 1 116.07 1 4- J 3 L - - J L 2- J L - - J 1 cn 0 0 - I I ° 12 I1 41H A« 7 r-~ I-- 2 I I 1 I L- J JL- J F2 I L J 1 3 5 CITY - L IM L - 6 ~2 - L- J ~ 7 J L - 3 SKYLNE ESTATES FILING NO. 3 - L FUTURE RESIDENTIAL - B DEVELOPMENT - (qty of WWhaNidge) c7, 13 L s 4 LL- J L_- J 5 -12- L _ J - L_- J - ",No 6 1 11 1 NO-JB1]1°1 l"TCN DITC11 L- J L J NIEPo/NE I _ ?a1 _ L 1D L 7 J L r - r - -I !12 e 1 9 L_ J L OP N 6P LE OPEN SPACE Y~1 J 4 i 5 J v i i 6 rt L7 7 L8 F J 9 ' I L_J I L_J F 11 L_J r12 - L---J +2' - DEiEN1tCN\ SKYLINE ESTATES _ OPEN SPACE FILING NO. 3 FUTURE PLANNED .i INDUSTRIAL / DEVELOPMENT UNINGONPORATEO JCFF9840N COUNTY RAR01.0 D. LUTB $ROOTS COMPLEA GOY OF ARVADA - t'^~CT A CITY Of ARVADA 414 Am 20.49 Act"- % 0440A c i~ I Tamer ra XAU1tluW NI GELN Fl p.adBnl f • L0" DBR,UY T Q I` 1. 1 O. 411IAors i I - GTV OF WHEAT qp~E .01 ,~7JjdA4'K"' RBEIdu10a1 Ta~90 Att.f 'IM3~.i~Y ql DL O y' 1 i ! 4i ~ '1 1 TRACTr 11 I OIIh./InduEl~Jyy PuX 1 / I ~ ~ /JAS MT' 111 I I pp Lea" OOP BOUNDARY - CRY LBBTS PROPOSED STSEET k~~O EXISTING STREET L" UK BOUNDARY o mo 3ao... woo goo BE11:B IN OUT W. 50TH AVE• LEE ST. IBS ervxiarosjaeza«ny _1 CEMETERY L~ L ISM, ~ RENO DI7CH ~ 1 tL' t r5 5 hI ~f ,,Loll 7 Sr 5-l C ` I/ ' 1 1 1 > ! 1 1 'L el tl (v k•W k, % i / 1 1 ' 1 1 ! 11 1 11 >l~ 1 1 T~'`ffFt6 -'k 1 ~ ~ J CommecW . " - I r (C . . I II I' CITY Of ARVADA 0) W. 50TH A% AREA TRACT H LAND USE RESDENTIAL/LGV DENSITY AC 74.35 DU'S/AC 3.0 W'S 223 SINGLE FAMILY UNITS TRACT A OPEN SPACE 16,67 TRACT C OFFICE/INDUSTRIAL PARK 57.65 TRACTD OFFICE/INDUSTRIAL PARK S.BB TRACT D RESIDENTIAL 19.90 35 70 SINGLE FAMILY UNITS TRACT F, G WNERCIAL/OFFICE 6A67 TOWUNIOLSES TRACT E WNMERCIil OFFICE 4559 PATIO HUNE$ TRACT H RESIDENTIAL/wIRUM 5308 8.0 SINGLE FAMILY ATTAOEO IQISITY/MLl]-PRIWY TOTAL. 342,79 STATEMENT OF INTENT- 1 It W the latent oP tM Calmurb tleparWnt of Ins<InRbns, the Call to State Board of Land Comisz r2, eW tM CIq ♦ Arvam to yovWe far a ywllty N+etl use tlevalcprent an tM1e yesent Rkp State Ho-x orW Trr.YtlnB Oth"a site Both tM1e OutiNe Bevebpnmt Plop arA the Wth1 zorinp proPOSetl for tM Nte K Ntpntletl to yotact a~J -t developetl partkns of property irm sIBnIPICant advV:d Npocts Prop tlevNof-1, oa the A. ahd to provw a pWlh uuetl ap roam to site des that 0 . the bPSt use F Mpoy'aq':y aro povke c t4Mty Weee¢n verqus elenents of aM use 41 0 MIWe c edol, WofeseWnl offlce, resWentlal, `i , uW light roustrhl uses. L Propozetl fMnslrq far the eventual tlevelapnent of the to Is unc-taln at this tole but N b the 6rtmtbn of the aemrs at the she that certNn tracts WU be sdtl N fee zlnpl¢ at. tracts keeea on o IVq tern boss to ahm quality eleveby:ent of the Nte In occxaence with appOcoole State Ontl local reBulatbrs 3 The site I: , sed of apyoxMntely 343 Dues and k h. by 4 MXntlfleo aerarz as foiloe9 a Colorado State Beartl of Land Caret-onerz, 620 CentearLt SO.., 1319 Braman Street, Sarver, C..-. W203 h Coloeotlo State Department of institutions, IWO Vest O fdC Aver. . lh,-, Cater.. 80236 c City of Arvodo, 8101 Rot . Road, Arvotlo, Colaroeb BMft a Glem G. Scott, 49M No- Street, Wheat "e, Geared, BW33 A A reti for propouk AN W arm oar tl ontl su tted to -bus selected aevNaPere M early 19B7 far d0velcp nt of the site At VIA tine. It .peers WvHopment of the Tract B Trcct H sMNtl eleveop first With bsequent aevehoe nt an other "tbv of the site A Trects A, B L N xlll be offered far pudic zme curlnp I987TM1¢ Ntent k L. toll the Iona to one Eexelaper xM1O .ol ye pore ware pu'suont to P, Develcgnent R..u.ter. The ske plan Wt Nusbote o unlfktl plan for the prgerty P^ov.NB for o snWtn iranzl.b of net rezltlentai tlensNks StalUal at 3 So ar acre on Tract B Inc-Nag to 12 W per .Qe the eestern Portion of hoI H The lorntkn of mfferNO nauzW at or the zheu relrrfwro ttv to trerrcnm of azltlendel tlensltkz The net rezltleMlal tlere tks of imct X y Y fron SS W Per a- m the wstern portion oP Track H MreaLp to 12 DU per' acre the east, stM he rorr8e of M1ous4p paluctz to i"Clutle zNple fWiy etteMtl, sNgie fanl'y clefted, lea hares, to- norm, one win-fonly awntrgs. Tae ¢ Nl rat reAventki de Sty ehdt net exceed B W per ev'e m track R The r,zh " slee for SiVe foMY detagvy M anY small be SAW ..are feet 6 The 3rd A .Agent transfers NAB arras frm Tract E to Tract H Tae NteNm prcpowtl street 09n is are ako rMsetl with the 3rd oneMrent 1. The 4th Am¢Mnmt atlas n~Atl f..l deett a M the apYoVvi Mu0N0 typaz on Tract M AtldltpndlY• the arcntlnent 1Mtz the total n l of uNtz far the 28.38 acre part. coyoslnB the zazterm O-U. of Tract H to 2a GO. S. The 5th Anhtln¢nt o stele FaAtY dsNiNBS to the approved heusNO hpes on mt A LAND DESCRIPTION. THAT PART OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SWTH, RANGE 69 VEST OF THE 6TH PM, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF. COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESC91M AS FOLLOWS RIDGE CENTER OUTLINE DEVELOPEMENT PLAN AMENDED BY: PREPARED BY. o MIAE Y OF ARVADA, COLORADO AMENDED 5 CONSULTING ENGINEERS p~ANNNGRDEPDT. H DATE: 2/25/02 roe V mr r 1 O I~ i y9~-~ L p +0~ rA Am H Ln7m;v> r Amy A m 1r m~0Ir Pt ~Q m - Z-1 g~ C s y~ Z C ~ I I L--- I I ~u n ~tl 5 £0'd 8b:VT ZOOZ 9 ja0 8ZO£-I0-£0£:xeJ 1d3Q 9NINNNld N0UMU 1 nn6v ours. cB woaB / I '°-RBGB8IB40W . RBCa/0511018 I l11"W 1 1I- C ~`u, r N ' 0I I N 91 j II ~L"- II ~3 ~ I I I § ~ 58 ~ I ~I I NA .aj R g P Rq - 97AEET \l ` t \W\ 6$ I No I I ; lii 6 v I \~__--L _ I gy1ag I \ I II. EI` 3 ~ ~ } R~~# e I ~ I N6 ` I \ a 10 A 8 1 l 1 } " ~ m \ 11 ¢ \ ~ 1 \ \ \ ~p6aB~~4 'li1 I 6. \\RR \ o \ 1248.20' 500'13'11"E L l C- mtRMOO RR8 1 r i J ill b I o l p p irGliii x m ~ :66.r m v . 0i R R D I p,, p [7 A r m ~R D 6G n 1 j v 2 I ZO'd GV:VT ZOOZ 9 Jac K0£-T£b-£0£:Xed AM 9NINNHId HOHA2IH f ~ L-; W O - 1 W O z z rT~ z (hr~1 W V C W O W Q a y 7~ CS U ~ U E N O C . ping w eW y ■ N ■ ■ N ■ N ■ N ! ■ N N ■ N ■ ■ ~ u N " IealIS ~MI!W ~ 3 C99 ■ N ■ 6 JNO .6_ y 30 v °a P - vv ca 333 c"` - 2c N5 aE m m ° _c ~n.mS E mt = r SU ■ OmC~NCE 263a ■ N ■ t G . . ■ ■ _ um .3 f . - E - 0 W v a1C 'o H Y 4 g~ = 5 u = _ E~ Q c7 v~ 5 2 m 52 0 L7 t6 a A a }}r.~ F= •S' 2 0 79 G 2 tip o G,~. u N m SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 2 A PART OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF ARVADA, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO PRELIMINARY PLAT STATISTICAL INFORMATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PART OF THE SE le OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH. RANGE 69 WEST OF TH N PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF ARVADA. COUNTY OF JEFFERSON. STATE OF COLORADO, BUNG MORE PARTCUTARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 16: THENCE NORM 0013'11" WEST. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 16, A DISTANCE OF 71.25 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORNERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE OF RIDGE ROAD, SAD POINT ALSO SONG THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE SOUTH OF 16; THENCE NORTH 89'37'11" EAST. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 059.27 FEET TO A PUNT ON SAID EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHMLST QUARTER OF SECTOR 16: THENCE SOUTH D013'11" EAST, ALONG SAID EAST UNE, A DISTANCE OF 1246.20 FEET TO THE PUNT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN TREASURER'S DEED RECORDED JUNE 10, 1992 UNDER RECEPTION No. 92069702 LEGEND: CONTAINING 25.76 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. - - BAGS OF BEARING BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE EAST UNE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER. SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH. RANGE 69 NEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AS BEARING N 0013' 11" W. THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER, MONUMENTS) BY A 3 1/4' - BRASS CAP STAMPED "CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LS 13212". THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST OUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER MONUMENTD BY A 2' ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED: - 'PLS 27601'. NOTES: O L THE FOLLOWING ITEMS LOCATED ALONG THE BOUNDARIES OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY - HAVE CREATED AREAS OF CONCERN: )MT AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE HORSE BARN AND SHED C PROPERTY. (SEE DETAIL SUBJECT R -SHE OHE- LYAND WESTERLY PROPERTY UNES OF ® AREAS OF OCCUPATION ALONG THE SOUTHE R F THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AS DENOTED BY (SEE DETAIL A AND DETAIL B) TW£El ANNEXATION PETITION, DEED, AND RELD CONDITIONS CY © C S DETN (SE ) g~ B VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1'= 1200' PROPOSED BOUNDARY UNE PROPOSED R.O.W. PROPOSED LET LINE PROPOSED FLOWJNE PROPOSED CENTERUNE PROPOSED UTILITY ESMT. PROPOSED IRRIGATION ESMT. PROPOSED LANDSCAPE EA1T. PROPOSED LOT NUMBER PROPOSED BLOCK NUMBER EXISTING R.O.W. EXISTING PROPERTY LINE EXISTING EASEMENT EXISTING FENCE EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC CITY LIMITS TOTAL SITE AREA ZONING PUD-R: ZONING PUD-1: NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS: AFFORDABLE HOUSING LOTS: DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE: OPEN SPACE REWIRES: OPEN SPACE PRONDED MINIMUM REWIRED LOT SIZE: MIN. AFFORDABLE HOUSING REWIRED LOT SIZE: RIGHT-OF-WAY-DEDICATION: AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 25.78 ACRES 20.91 ACRES 4.87 ACRES TO LOTS , 7 UNITS 3.33 DU/AC 2.10 ACRES 10.00% (OF PUD-R AREA) 2.85 ACRES =13.581 (OF PUD-R AREA) 6000 SOFT (EXCLUDING AFF. HOUSING LOTS) 40OU SOFT 5.09 ACRES 0.51 ACRES (54TH AVE.) 0.18 ACRES (OF PUD-R AREA) TRACT INFORMATION PROJECT TRACT A HOA OPEN SPACE 0.16 ACRES TRACT B HOA OPEN SPACE 0.98 ACRES SITE TRACT C HOA OPEN SPACE 0.43 ACRES TRACT D HDA OPEN SPACE OAD ACRES TRACT E HOA OPEN SPACE 0.97 ACRES TRACT F HOA OPEN SPACE 0.06 ACRES TRACT G HOA OPEN SPACE 0.40 ACRES TRACT H HOA OPEN SPACE 0.05 ACRES TRACT I HOA OPEN SPACE 0.11 ACRES SHEET INDEX: LOT INFORMATION 1 COVER SHEET PUO-R: ZONING 2-3 PRELMINARY PLAT BLOCK 1 LOTS 1-15 SINGE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 3.08 ACRES BLOCK 2 LOTS 1-20 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 3.50 ACRES BLOCK 3 LOTS 1-23 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 3.78 ACRES BLOCK 4 LOTS 1-12 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 2.11 ACRES ZONING PUD-i: BLOCK 5 LOT 1 COMMERCIAL/INDUSIRIAL 1.54 ACRES BLOCK 5 LOT 1 COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL 123 ACRES PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PREPARED FOR, S MELODYHOMES,. p~ 2 9 E M MICCHAEL W CONSULTING ENGINEERS 5&O 9M GMa 9LL 9A XS. DmW'~c ®III 11031 SHERIDAN BLVD. WESTMINSTER, COLORADO 80020 PHONE (303)-466-1831 FAY- (303)-466-1838 SHEET 1 OF 3 JKTLINL tJIHItJ I'ILIINU INV. L SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 2 A PART OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF ARVADA, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO PRELIMINARY PLAT 00 1 M BOB. .PROPOSED m 3 o UTIUTY MT. ~4 i ~pmm u~r-ono M ZQNUN m O A rcpo°u Z 3 d~ 3 11 b2 0 o ~Li mm K Uf OD K N U 31Grcu wN~p rc 2 4i 3 U PROPOSED 30.00' LANDSCAPE EASEMENT S 60 R.p.W I 1 l P\ O\ unutt 1. EASEMENT Ie I AREAS OF OCCUPATION TO BE RESOLVED PRIOR TO FINAL PLAT AND FDP (SEE OETMU A AND B) . BLOCK 5 LOT 1 1.54 ACRES c -589'32'35"W 59180' ~-"91r f DANA DION VERNON G. k BOOK 2725 PAGE 590 DANE M. WFBACK I RECx87075197 :00• Gtt OF WHEAT R W . RIDCE BWNOARY I UNE i I oLLo ( (I SQo iL ` jNU r MISTING 30.w WATER EASEMENT III (TO BE PARTIALLY ABAND ' (REC. NO. F1200729 ~I AREA OF CONCERN 'I SEE DETAIL C _ 43$3Ow I `SECTION UNE r dge R°°d LURE Ri 60.00' R.O.W. ' EXISTING BARBED WIRE FENCE EXISTING 100.00' R.O.W BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD EXISTING 55.00 ill W R.O.W. SHEET 2 OF 3 MATCH LINE SEE SHEET 3 77 00 07~ sEMENT n I / 2 116.0]' i~ t!2,002 8 00' PROPOSED ° 17 1 ~ . Q_ unutt EASEMENT 115. 50.0v SMNO 1 50.00' _ R O W Ie e 1O~ O O R.O.W. UGIFM 1 . . . to DITCH C DITCH CL TRACT G 1 ' 0.10 ACRE I TRACT E 0.97 ACRES TRACT B 50.00' 3200' HT 16 3s° E ~ q. 53g9 A ~ f I 1365"! i i / I I 301p i ory ~~z8 i I S 48-26'21'W W a J g I / I T\ ' BLOCK '6 LOT 1 II 3.22 ACRES OUSTING 30.00 WATER EASEMENT IREC. NO. F1200]29)1 0.98 ACRES PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION so G 1 so 100 QRIGNAL SCALE: I'=50' WIRE OF OCCUPATION TOTE 1, SHEET i) m s: 1zo.3•s AREA OF OCCUPATION (SEE NOTE 1, SHEET I) E~ DETAIL B NO SCALE PkC 0.47' LS 12~ 0.17' METAL \~J PkC LS PIPE 19360 RO ~l 0.16' W DETAIL C NO SCALE JKTLIIVt tJIHItJ t•ILIIVb 111J. L DETAIL A NO SCALE SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 2 A PART OF THE SE 1 /4 OF THE NW 1 /4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF ARVADA, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO PRE IMINARY34PLAT 33 ' 32 31 30 Nc so.oo L~>-EDW 30 ( ~~Etl5nNG50.00' PRELIMINARY ' ' R.O.W. 1 SKYUNE ESTATES 30.00' FILING NO. lt SDED l NOT FOR E%ISTRG R.O.W _ EMSTNGESMT. E/cUNOER-C~INSRitlCTlO h CONSTRUCTION l EG PUBLIC ROM. - R F09375 9- - - - e--~-$t` S4W AVenue - _ - OO a WOO _ N89'37'11 859.27'_ _ i - PROPOSED R.O.W 0 16ACT A - - r - TRACT D 0.10 ACRES CT F 0.06 A R ACRES i 1911 1 ° 115.28 115.31 115.2a "'I, NT 8.00' PROPOSED N BAD' PROPOSED I. I L m IT i UTILITY o o o -Yd'-UTILITY EASEMENT o 1 J EASEMEN T p p w ~8.00' 2 UPRO6P ED 13 UT~ttPEASEMS~T ! WATER EASEMENT Q I 30 30' EASEMENT tt5.a0' 116.07 TO BE PARTIALLY ABANDONED) 115.8 ' (REC. N0. F120072.) 11 8.00' PROPOSED I I UTILITY ESMT:o r o W ';C j iz I 1,I ° rc m d . e 10° J I ml m 14 w 8.00' PROPOSED n unum EASEMENT I I ~ u "%In tts.e0' i 1 1 seD' ttfi.DT~Il M o y a of 13 E 9 `4 e 8.00' PROPOS l I 1 11115.60' ( ( N ESMT. UTILITY s -(O rvti /o ' I F .I 16.OO PROPOSED UTILITY O ° N w o 0 06' .112 i^ TRACT C m i 2 i" EASEMENT 8 1° e I I m K w 4u 0.43 ACRES l i~ J ° I ' I SQo 11 s. 1 I 15.80 11 ED 3 102.25 : 8.00' PROPOSED -9 c 1 rvln / L~ 2J $ O r 0 I a ®B ^ EASEMENT 03 50.00' 50 t tts. R.O.W. 15R.0 W. tt I CITY OF S Z I I I~ B0IMDMYE m ^ 8.00' PROPOSED 4 o } 7 1 ' ' b LINE N i 6.PROPOSutt ED J to UTILITY ESMT. < U0710 ESMT. ,e I I„ e 6000• 1oD.oo' I so o w too :a m 2 1 0 4 _ ~iO I I 1 1 30.00'MSTNG p I WATER EASEMENT ORIGINAL SCALE 1"=50' p W 1 rc s u R.O.W. I tt .60' 115. ~I 1 16.0]' (TO BE PARTIALLY ABANDONED) 00729) 0W29) 1 ! 16.00' PROPOSED I_ (REC. NO. "200729) UTILITY ESMT. 6 o $ 16.00' PROPOSED _ 100.00• r w.! p o O 1 ~J ( e UTUIT Um 1. 1 _ . - - - - el RI 1 0' li nsao• I° 131 6Q 6 ° 19 A Ala yO r u N Fl I E N 100.9' F I PROPOSED o~rco I :E FI3 to 4 1C CIF 4I Ie°. J I IRRIGATION PROPO I F 1 a EASEMENT OVER TRACT H ~E>• m :q 8 W I'm° 5 w W PROPOSED 2G W I I [~pJ 20.9' N 1 a' 116.07' (BY SEPARATE DOCUMENT) 8.00• PROPOSED _ I 115.80' 1 115 I 131.60' 100.00' ] MSTNG E UTILITY ESMT a 1 ; 8.00' PROPOSED J N ~EA9wENT TRACT11 .11 ACRES ACT H 0.05 A IRRIGATION DITCH CENTERLINE I Pr l ,I UTITY EASEMENT IN I- 1 1.60 7 8.00' PROPOSED 4 11 7 I a 11 a $ o °y 21, O ti W UTILITY ESMT. i O 6.00' PROPOSED 3 100.00' o° 115.80' ! 11 ~UTILITY EASEMENT : Izu.uu 1 ' 116.07' - - 30.00' EXISTING 9.00' PROPOSED R - 1Y $ Y 1 i WATER EASEMENT i o UTILITY ESMT. y j e .8 q ds ° 22 m l 1 1. (TO BE PARTIALLY ABANDONED) 60 3 i w u b ' Id 3 I (REL. NO. F1200729) .O.W. i~ 50.9' 100.00 2 i 115.80" R.O.W. _50.00' 8.00' PROPOSED I I I i 1 23 N R.O.W. 116.07' UDUTY I .I 131. EASEMENT o I~ .I n 5 F 2 1 e 'q 1no.oo' 1D ry " 8.00 PEASEMROPOSED o Unutt ENT y a 2 I ' MATCH LINE SEE SHEET 2 SHEET 3 OF 3 Q, 311 ILINE CJ IM ILJ 1-ILIIVV INV. G SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PART OF THE BE 1/4 ON NW 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TONNSIIP 3 SOUTH. RANGE 69 WEST ON THE 6N PRINCIM MERIDIAN, CITY OF ARVADA, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTIWUI Y DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST WARTER OF SAID SECTION 15; THENCE NORTH 00T3Y1' WEST. ALONG THE EAST UNE OF TIE SOUTHEAST WARIER OF THE NORTHWEST WARTER ON SAID SECTION 16, A DISTANCE ON 71.25 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE OF RIDGE ROAD, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE POINT OF BEG NNING THENCE SOUTH 741530' WEST. ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE, A DISTANCE OF 2".09 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID OF 16: E OF 16; 1246.20 f TO THE PUNT OF 9EGINI CONTAINING 25.78 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. UNE A DISTANCE OF BASIS OF BEARING: BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE EAST UNE OF THE SOUTHEAST WARIER OF THE NORTHWEST WARIER, SECTON 16. TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AS BEARING N MIS 11' W. THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST WARIER. MONUMENTS) BY A 3 1/4' BRASS CAP STAMPED 'CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LS 13212'. THE NORTHEAST CORNER V THE SOUTHEAST WARIER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER MONUMENTED BY A 2' ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED: 'PLS 27601'. NOTES: 1. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS LOCATED ALONG THE BOUNDARIES OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HAVE CREATED AREAS OF CONCERN: Q HORSE BARN AND SUED PROPERTY. (SEE ENCROACHMENT AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SUBJECT ® AREAS OF OCCUPATION ALONG THE SOUTHERLY A!ND WESTERLY PROPERTY LINES OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AS DENOTED BY L (SEE DETAIL A AND DETAIL B) DISCREPANCYC )TWEEN AN UNATION PETITION, DEED. AND REM CONDITIONS (SEE DETAIL 2. LOCATION OF PLANTINGS ON LANDSCAPE PUN ARE CONCEPTUAL. AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE 3. LOT 2. BLOCK 5 AND LOT 1 BLOCK 6 WILL REWIRE AMENDED MNAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT. PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN A PART OF THE SE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF ARVADA, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO COVER LEGEND: 1 U 77~~ PROPOSED BOUNDARY UNE PROPOSED R.O.W. PROPOSED LOT UNE PROPOSED ROWUNE PROPOSED CENTERUNE PROPOSED SETBACK PROPOSED UTUTY ESMT. PROPOSED IRRIGATION ESMT. PROPOSED LANDSCAPE MT. PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR PROPOSED IRRIGATION DRAIN PROPOSED WATER UNE PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED LOT NUMBER PROPOSED BLOCK NUMBER EXISTING R.O.W. EXISTNG EOA IXISTNG ROW UNE EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR EXISTING FENCE METING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC EXISTING TREES CITY WITS VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1'= 4W' W M icalIQH AM CONSULTING ENGINEERS :W~:,AR M,A40mnIReWX.°b`°°MITI 6OF LII( 49HY➢ W6 pg wn . SHEET INDEX: 1 COVER SHEET 2 TYPICAL SECTIONS 3-4 SITE PLAN 5-6 GRADING AND UTILITY PLAN 7-10 LANDSCAPE PLAN 11-61 ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PREPARED FOR SSMEIODYHOMES_ 11031 SHERIDAN BLVD. WESTMINSTER, COLORADO 80020 PHONE: (303)-466-1631 FAX (303)-466-1838 STATISTICAL INFORMATION TOTAL SITE AREA: ZONING PUD-R: ZONING PUD-I: NUMBER OF IN FLUNG UNITS: AFFORDABLE HOUSING LOTS: DWEWNG UNITS PER ACRE: OPEN SPACE REWIRED: OPEN SPACE PROVIDED: MINIMUM REWIRED LOT SIZE: MIN. AFFORDABLE HOUSING REWIRED LOT SIM RIGHT-OF-WAY-DEDICATON: 25.76 ACRES 20.91 ACRES 4.87 ACRES 70 LOTS 7 UNITS 133 DU/AC MD ACRES - 10.005 (OF PUD-R AREA) 285 ACRES -13.586 (OF PUD-R AREA) 6000 SOFT (EXCLUDING AM. HOUSING LOTS) 4000 SOFT 5.09 ACRES 0.51 ACRES (54TH AVE) AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 0.18 ACRES (OF PUD-R AREA) TRACT INFORMATION TRACT A HOA OPEN SPACE 0.16 ACRES TRACT B HOA OPEN SPACE 0.98 ACRES TRACT C HOA OPEN SPACE 0.43 ACRES TRACT D HOA OPEN SPACE D.10 ACRES TRACT E HOA OPEN SPACE 0.97 ACRES TRACT F HOA WEN SPACE 0.06 ACRES TRACT G HOA OPEN SPACE 0.10 ACRES TRACT H HOA WEN SPACE 0.05 AMES TRACT I HOA OPEN SPACE 0.11 ACRES LOT INFORMATION ZONING PUD-R: BLOCK 1 LOTS 1-15 SINGLE FAMIL Y RESIDENTIAL 108 ACRES BLOCK 2 LOTS 1-20 SNGLE FAMIL Y RESIDENTIAL 3.SG ACRES BLOCK 3 LOTS 1-23 SNOE FAMIL Y RESIDENTIAL 3.76 ACRES BLOCK 4 LOTS 1-12 SINGLE FAMIL Y RESIDENTIAL 2.11 ACRES ZONING PUD-I: BLOCK 5 LOT 1 COMMERCIAL/HNDUSTRIAL 1.54 ACRES BLOCK 6 LOT 1 COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL 123 ACRES ZONING LAND USE TABLE RESMENTAI ZONING: PIJ -R RESIDENTIAL STANDARD LOT: MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE 35.OOi MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 66.0 FT MAXIMUM BOLDING HEIGHT: 35.0 FT SET BACKS: FRONT: 18.5 FT SDE 7.5 F REAR: 10.0 R AFFORDABLE LOTS: MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGC 30.005 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE 50.0 FT MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: 3S0 FT SET BACKS: FRONT: 18.0 FT SDE: 5.0 FT REAR. 10.0 FT _ coCIA, ANDUSTUAL 70NNG PUD-1 PERMITTED LAND USE USAF MANUFACTUPoNG UGHT INWSlT)AL 1 AC MINIMUM LOT SIZE: MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE 50.005 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE 100.0 Fi MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: N/A SET BACKS: FRONT; 50.0 R SOL 5.0 REAR: 10.0 R SHEET 1 OF 61 SKYLINE ES I A I ES F ILINU NU. L rur SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 2 PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN A PART OF THE SE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF ARVADA, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO TYPICAL SECTIONS I I Ili[ SECTION A-A TYPICAL LOCAL STREET SECTION N.T.S. 60 ,J i2 ,o 0 IDS 0 100 200 6 ORIGINAL SCALE: 1'=100' I PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1 I ,2 R I1 )3 i0 t0 ,3 II I 1 9 is 10 it 13 I e is s I ® B ® ® T t6 ® ©8 B T L I J 6 n I I e t6 5 ,e 6 °SHEET 3 & 5 ESMT~ I V. I ESMT. 6 CL I I I I I I 5 2'-it 1d 14' 2'-11 I 4 ( SIDEWALK SI9EWAIH I 0.5 0.5' L i1 11 5' 2'7 32' Y2' S' I FL-R SECTION B-B 2 TYPICAL MINOR COLLECTOR STREET S ECTIO N , RO.W 96' R.O.W. ROW 36.5• ROW. g. . 48.5' R.O.W. R.O.W. 26' R-FL 36, PL-R 12 FRONTAGE ROAD (CONSTRUCTED BY OTTERS) W. 5 4T AWNNE (CO.YSTRUCTED BY OTHERS) I I _ - C 4' MOUNTABLE 6' VERTCAL 6" VERTICAL VERTICAL CI1RB k GUTTER CL CURB & GDTIER CURB & WTTER CL CURB @ CUTTER PROPOSED 5.0' SECTION C-C SECTION C-C SIDEWALK FRO NTAGE ROAD/W. 4TH AVENU N.T.S. E TY PICAL SECTIO N I ] 9 } I 16 22 3 2 3 19 R3 2 ®2 1 P~ 1 I I ~p / A A L 1I ® I SHEET 4 & 6 r' I i SHEET 2 OF 611 SKYLINE ESIA Its FILING NU. 2 HUH ~m Ro 9i Ne~~ s8&~ PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN A PART OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF ARVADA, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO SITE PLAN SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 2 - - - - - - - _ ~ ~ ~ ~i i w MELODY ~OME3 0I III SKYLINE E TATES I OO.oO' (FILING N0. 1, AMENDED I ElOSnNG R.O.W BEC_g F1 00231 - - - mil` ~ ' E%IS `B0: - - - - - -I- - - FA-MN9fR-P. NSTRHPliO 7TT T/TTTTT~ T~ TRA 0'6 C7A ACRES FNCE a mm ~m b~ FK K a Nr ~o W of aN ONUN Mfr m B.00' PROPOSED Unum ENT. .5 uacmcn L---- -t---J Ir - To do- - 93 I~ zso I,r SIDE SETBACK L I 4 (TYP.> S;DE ETBAC N (WP) I IL----- ----J I" I I, 2 - r---- ~ ; l (n I I ~ ~n I I i' ° 1 L-----J I r-----1 ~ i 3za FLF B PROPOSED 0 Unutt MT. 1 fio.a L-----J R.o.r l2uuu . - - - - - 1 y ~ ' I i Ir-----~ ; i I ;IM I ll" I I ` ~ Ip ' -J ( iL ( I E I c !I 7 8.00• PROPOSED I UBUW ESMT 1 I I a T L---- J ;F -1 e19 I s IL J ' 6Df6 !R.o1 - 32b Ir----- ~ I iFl{I II i s I u I£ PROPOSED T TRACT C 0.43 ACRES IT IC all L-- JI I 1TSeS I B.OD' PROPOED -Ij ~UTUtt ESMT. Il Iel 7 I L - - - _ - I x6U'R PROPOSED _ Io UnuTY MT. ~I c L - -IT3:as - el 5 I L--ITias- Ie i L - -ft48Ti t-r OD' PROPOSED of UTUtt MT. el 3 I L--13ea`- r---- s. 1 i„1 1 859.27' 3§QQ' _ N89'37'11°E E T EXISnNC CONCRTE FL-FL c 0.00' PROPOSED unutt I _ FASE11 tEN~~ J o II 8.00' PROPOSED L UTUW EASEMNJ 1 II _--'TT36o J I I'. 13 I i --175 w~ I li 14 --iT5.eo J I 15 i 16 --Tis.GO J s:oCVROPmEO-}a UnLltt EASEMENT( I slo r 8.00' PROPOSED o Unutt EASEMENT Ili e l ' I II. Lisso--Jl I 10I1~ I I:~ L ~1sso--Jl of II; I 9 li~ L~sao--Jl 16.00 PROPOSED unuw e I EASEMENT a', L i5ao- - JI S r3, 7 1 L 11115 50- - _I °I ~I L - -3T3o - I 16.00' PROPO~ I unutt ESIAT. L - i3-3o - o i a 17 jai; 1 e r--_...-- y ICI : 11v.S0' J z _ 8.00' PROPOSNED _ _ _ I • ~I ~ j unutt EASEMr to F - ilil° ~ 2 --1 J j I'so.w•'•' I R.OW I , q ILL nI r----- e.DO•'R.. unutt EASEMN~ I _ na IF MATCH LINE SEE SHEET II of 0 12 eI j .L ;rseo--J it &00• PROPOSED 'I UTUW ESMT. ' 13 el IL 11~~-J IF- I of II 14 ~I IL its.eo -J jr----- 1 II- of I 15 ~I IL -ts6o` - J ' Ir---- I 16 IL ~ ~-J IF---~ o r gI 'I / III [L J -mo.DO'- , 1 a o III :L -Ioo.oo,- -J r-----l a I' ~It9 to I~ '1L _mo.Do'- J M (r--- 8 41 20 I r II '"L -1oo.o0•- -J I .11 ACRES li IF----1$ ~ 12T I ~ I 'L loo oo-J r r ~o al 22 0 Mi I L_100.00'-J~ Im {r---~5 11 0l 23^ns.~ll T "L J " I io 1 ,T F O.C F- 111Z 12 1 6.00' PROPi UPUtt EASE 'I u 10 ;I L-iF nr~ rl 4 Oa RI ~ L-it- Ir- 1I 7 it g ?I Ir- 5 jACT H 0.051• 1 I SIDE it1BAG( °o I _LbT L- nb.m' r--- L '1£XIrnO.W. S r R. I --~I 30.00' EASnNG WATER EASEMENT BE PARMALLY ABANDONED) (REC. NO, F1200729) E%IS'RNG BARBED WIRE ' ~ FNCE 30.00• EMSTNG WATER EASEMENT TO BE PARTALLY ABANDONED) (REC. NO. F12W729) I wI. o - ~o ~Qa jNU &00' PROPOSED Unutt EASNNT E%ISnNG OVERHEAD ELECTRic tt DF /NHaEAT RIDGE BOUNDARY UNE PROPOSED 20.00 RRIGABON NT OVER TRACT H ABATE DOCUME" EASPNG RENO J CHN IRRIGAMN DITCH CENTER UNE 30.00' EASING WATER EASNENT f0 BE PARnALLY ABANDONED) (REC. NO. n200729) 8.00' PROPOSED unutt EASNENT i 50 0 5o 100 mmm~ ORIGINAL SCALE: 1'=50• PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET 3 OF 61 SKYLINL LS I A I L5 F ILINU NU. L F'UF' SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 2 ~Q Shy 00 NB$°n efSui oa~° xGw om U KFOw ~Q~UN w~a w°.m rcrd~U w ngy 3 2 O p m 0 VI-°o KNU ~'o 21dKU WN~~ rc x 3 U I . _ J UTUTY ESMT 4 x 10.00' BEAR SETBACK _L1P~ _J 50 I Z SIRE SETBACI( • (TYPJ I I 8.0~' PROPOSE, I UTILITY EASEMENT PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN A PART OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF ARVADA, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO SITE PLAN MATCH LINE SEE SHEET 3 111 - L II 17 I i'm°I 8.00' PROPOSED J to 1 L. J jLUTUtt EASEMENJ i 2 u „ .as 15. V 16D0 PROPOSED L -i w EAEMAT ----i r 11132100' r- It60>_~o r p f~ II PROPOSED R: : u Lvv 1 ]2.00 1 FL R 8.U00'tt EASEMENT iel L M 50.00 1 EXISTING I. 150.00 VTI' " O 0 - - J, .L - _ - J {)JW, 1360 iIS6' .R.O.W RENO-UICHEM I. 1 R'O'W' ( Ji N DITO1 CL L --11807 ~I PROPOSED PROPOSEDI 4D' DETACHED 1 1 TRACT G N 1 18.50' 4.0' DETACHED 1 WALK (TYP.) : 0.10 ACRES FRONT SETBACK WALK (TYP.) ( ;a 1 1 PROPOSED I (j TRACT E I " j WA NDTttP)EO 0.97 ACRES ''15c% TRACT 8 / E 0.98 ACRES 1 AVE , a e \ PROPOSED CENTER LINE "T41 ' R RENC-XCHEM ]2.00 - 160 e a REALIGNMENT OF 50.00',8 R oN IRRIGAnON DITCHR.O.W / t UntJtt ESMT. A• J i I i I! I PROPOSED Bom, J \ 1 LANDSCAPE EASEMENT I MOOT FRONT SETBACK I 348'26'21W 35 08• 50.00' MONT SETBACK . ( ) \ \A \ ~ U BLOCK 6 LOT 1 I I \L(~ 3.22 ACRES I E \ , 1 3000 AREAS OF OCCUPATON 1 TO BE RESOLVED PRIOR TO FINAL PLAT AND FOP (SEE DETAILS A AND B) BLOCK 5 LOT all 1.54 ACRES I I I 500' 1 WATER EASEMENT 1 (REC. NO. F1200'2BJ i 5.00' / ,,1 2~9 SIDE SETBACK (Tv) _ //E%ISnNG Ridge, Road / E%STING GAS UNE OHE EKISTNG 23.422 EXUSMNC BARBED HARE ASPHALT ROADWAY / IXISnNG 100.00' R.O.W DOSING TELEPHONE I BURLINGTON NORTHERN RNLROAD PEDESTAL \ I_FEXSASPHAALLT8G3 ROADWAY 11 EXISTING h I~ 55D0' R.O.W. EXISTING BARBED WIRE FENCE CITY OF WHEAT ~RIDBE BOUNDARY LINE F0o Fs4o EMSTING 30.00 WATER EASEMENT (TO BE PARDAUY ABANDONED) (REC. NO. F1200729) AREA OF CONCERN SEE DETAIL C IXI~ 5/ T TAL PEDESTAL -SECTOR UNE 50 0 50 100 ORIGINAL SCAI£ 1"=50' PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROP CI FALLS Win HORSE BN H( DETAIL A NO SCALE WIRE OF OCCUPATON NOTE 1, SHEET 1) ~1T1 5 2120.3'2 NO SCALE P&C 0.4>'~38 0.17' METAL P&C LS PIPE ` 19380 Rg bD ale' \O.u' DETAIL C NO SCALE AREA OF OCCUPATI ON (SEE NOTE t, SHEET 1) DETAIL B SHEET 4 OF 611 1 I i I I I I rrrm~ R.O. Stl9 EXISTING FENCE SYO i DANA DION VERNON G. & BOOK 2725 PAGE 590 DIANE M. WRBACK RECW075197 SKYLIIVL L5IAILJ I-ILIIVG NLJ. Z rut- ° x ¢ ~m m ~U Kp IXISTINC BARBED WIRE FENCE Nm rc°° ° Uq u w°~wm W V~K% EF m / PR / iH1.00 ~ f~ l r / i l / I t Tom` 10 / CH /I /Y SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 2 PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLA N A PART OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF ARVADA, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO GRADING AND UTILITY PLAN 50 0 50 IGO I ORIGINAL SCALE: 1"=50' ELODYNEHOMEESTAT II 5 YLI I l I I I j w pEp FNNNO 1 AM 30 00 ( ( N ( O'er I I~ II 60.0 - . , . - - G RA. - - - - - - N 1) r.. - EMSFNO ESMT. q p UNDER CONSTRUCTION T -R." - - 7 J PUBLIC R.O.W. EC ' z7 - 859 PRELIMINARY E 37,i Na9 . - - - - - - - NOT FOR . CONSTRUCTION / - - / / I PROSDSED " 2 k / / . i. / / ✓ / / / ROPOSED y e" WATER / / 8 WATER UNE (WPJ- / I' E%I6HNG it w / / / PROPOSED 8" i SANITARY SEER DUNE (IYPJ / / WATER 30. EASEMENT (TvP TO BE PARHALLY ABANDMEG) / (REC. NO. F1204902) 10 ` B G ! PROPOSED SANITARY SEER W /4 RRI ATONTINE / / I l / / N PROPOSED - - / - /EX1511NG = EAD O Nom- ELESPl1 t UllUtt WATER l i NE (WP.) so (>1p) ' .R060. /16 50 I WHEAT RIDGE / a i NtOW` BOUNDARY WINE R.O.W. 32.00' - i / / / . 3200' 1 1 / / I WATER WINE / (TD BE 402A1ED) / / 14 / I 1 32. / IXI600' WATER EASEMENT (EI BE PARTIALLY ABANDONED) I (REC. NO. F1204902) f r PROPOSED' , 9 ABANDONED 4" 20.00' IRRIGATION IRRIGAHONP ~A'TO / UNE .EASEMENJi / / PROPOSED / ( I 1 % s oAFx I Z 1 I PROPOS 8 SANI Y SEERL ( ) I /LINE (Tro.) I P,RpPOSED 8" _ $pNITARY SEWER I ~ ~/ABANDON (3) CASs IRONED PIPES JRRICAIIDN PIPES / I / I 1 / (TYH.) y ~ / I I D / / F ME T ! % ' REALIGNMENT GAT ON I % UGN N PROPOSE RE 32.00 OF RENO-JUCHEM IRRICATON GL-R / " PPEPOSED 8" J HUN J DIRH 3y RCP / / / ) a r DITCH/ 6 RCP 22 WATER LINE I M ( I / / I I / 50 0' / /2 f 1 FL-FIL FLFL r rA) LLL MATCH LANE SEE SHEET 6 SHEET 5 OF 61 SKYLINL LJ IA ILJ rluNb NU. z ruI SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 2 PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN A PART OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF ARVADA, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO GRADING AND UTILITY PLAN o O~o G UKFOm ~fohK fD 3 M _ / 3 I. / 2 o m 0 0 =~mm ur o_o KNU 3 Grcu war rc ~i rc u 3 U MnNG 00.00' BURMNCTON NORTHERN RNIROAD EXISTING TELEPHONE E%IANG G15 UNE PEDESTALS I ~ I i i i E%ISTNG 55.00 R.O.W. SHEET 6 OF 61 1. / J N~~ PROPOSED REAIJGNMENT OF REMMUCHEM IRRIGATON DITCH JG• RCP % . 1 a - ~i 1/I I / O / ( I ( PR .W. / / I J I I I 020v % / l F-F P OS TI r LL I,(I ; ROPOSED STORM SEINER / / / i i O/ / ' Sam, ' / R.O.W. i I(iazoa' 1 I /Y Z .O I R-R / N NTON POND / PROPOSED ST~RMI N Itt SEWER it REP~ tl N/ 1 , i PROPOSED j STORM SEWER ' DO RCP / / / 1 I I I © I II ~ I J / $.D / ' WA EASEMENT I T 50 0 50 100 ORIGNAL SCALE: 1"-50' / PRELIMINARY NOT FOR - CONSTRUCTION m ~o I E%ISTMG / 00 / J WA EASEMENT (TQ BE-P R3: ABANDONED) (REC. NO. F1200]29) \ f //~j'PROPOSED-ST / 5"14383 - Ids G 0ERH AD EMC71 ~ m IECTRIOAL LINE i _ EXISTING TELEPHONE RE PEDESTALS 0.W! i NG BARBWIRE EXISTING 23.423 FENCE i ASPHALT ROADWAY \\I / J J ~ /~/-~/j I I I VERNON G. h BOOK DANA DIANE 590 DIANE' M. WffBACK REC#87075197 j I 5I III I II SKYLINE ES I A I ES FILING NU. 2 f UF' 0 15 30' 60' 0 y NORTH SCALE V=30'-0" EXISTING LANDSCAPE SIGHT DISTANCE ASSUMING /30 MPH STREET + - PERIMETER FENCE BRICK/ (TYP) COLUMN (TYP) STREET TREE PROGRAM BY HOA ONE TREE" 1.4 PER LOT 13 12 I 12, +n+0+ SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 2 PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN A PART OF THE W 1/2 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF ARVADA, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO LANDSCAPE PLAN WEST 54TH AVE. r PERIMETER TRANIIN 3 RAIL FENCE ` STREETTREEPROGRAM BY FICA. ONE TREE PER LOT 11 I, 1 PERIMETER FENCE STREETTREE PROGRAM ITYP) BY HOA ONE TREE BRICK 11 12 PER LOT COLUMN (tYP) 0 14 7 H LINE SEE SHEET 8 r ~ ~ ~ r MOM" NOMS DUUEA ~~re ~ae~ewaeem:e nowmcmw oenw,cao~woemr Fmc36t ~111~ PYpne:]N8931169 SHEET 7 OF TREE PLANTING LIST SYM COMMGNNU4 B0TANIC0LNWE SIIEa COND. BECIOU WSCPNGPYTRFFS KC KENNCKYC0FFFt7NEE GYMN0LLPDL60pYA TC SA BUMMRASH US FENNMVPNIG'911WAIP TCALAL.m BO BURRQU( QUERC E C m T WHO VdBiTERN FARY CELTS CCM NTAOB CEE CA1'm T %B HBO ASO NOWE"URTHfRNREO01K NA OUERCUSCLIS BUENA E TCALBSB PA PATMJREASH FRAXINUS LVA MORP TCA MA AUNMNNRPIEASH AMERIC %WUMsN PoY FFAVNUSpMEflICPNA'N1NM4E L.M TGLLBSS EVEftGRE AP AUSR2Wi% MMI NE A P M.BB.%S. (SPECMFN) CS MYJSPRJCE cEAPm . ECLN RW RCCff CCKY 0UNiaNNNB4A URIP SSCO JUNIPERUSSPMMILORUM W. m: " . %S. HTB9 0PoWI REE OUR MME OUR AC" GPIWIA BCAUMP,BSB CR CRC CANABAREDCHC%ECHEARY PRUNUSVIRGIN44N45fPJBFAT 1T3'CALBSB m TaR4 H4WINgU! GRATAEGUS•PAUL•sSfJAIET 11I[CAL %B 1CH 1H0RNLESS000KSPURHAWTIpFN LRATAEGUSCRUSGLLNMERML4 11O CALM M PPPIENTCTWOP E MALUS'RADAHT 11?CALSSB SSL SPRINGSNOWGRA&J'RE M4U3'SPMUSNCW 11?CALm SEE SFNOBLONSERJILEBERRY AMEIA10HIERCaU0.-NSIS O'CWNP SHRUB PLANTING LIST EVERGREENSMUES CCJ CAOACYCaWETJUMPE0. JUNIPERUSSMINA'G1GaWCgRPET ar w BNJ BROADMWRJUNIPEfl JUNIPERUS SABIN4&iDFDMAR m°~'a` ~x Ti TMAJUMPER JUNIPERDSSASIN4TPMW6pF0W' ($W MP MUOO PINE PINUS MLIGO TTJ TABLETOP BLUEJUMPER JUNIPERUS BWPUL0RUM TU&ETW BLUE DECID UOUSSHRUBS ACC AMERIRNCOMPACTCRA BERRY VIBURNUMTMLOBUMWMPACTUIN APP APACHEFLUME FALLUGN PARADDYA err- AM PIPHONY WATFAERS%REA 4%MFA WMAIM'PMNOM'WAIFIVE(T w AC aP RIBES M BB RUMBLER LUSH TUAA K0LMNTII4AIMBIUS # I~ % ~ Y r BMS SLUEMNUSHAEA CMYOPTEMS%CLW0FNEN56 ~ IC P ~ M U I MARF DWARFK0RF4lLUlAC SIRING4MEYEW fE 9 frBlBN'KK RM PR FC FEFNBUSH CWWAEPAIWVIAMIUEFgA1N 0 15' 3M 60 NORTH SCALE 1"=394" SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO.2 PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN A PART OF THE W 1/2 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF ARVADA, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO SHRUB PLANTING LIST LANDSCAPE PLAN GDP GOLDDROPPOTEIRBIA PaTENnlu'WNOROP MM MWMax MAXOGaJr cERWPARPUSMOMANUs PL COMMONPURPIELfthc SYNNGAVVLGARS 5- ~ 16 WSSWl51Gf PER0VSIWALfUF1IGfNA SrW.w RB R43BRBRUSN, iALLGREFH CXRYSOOUWUSNWSEOSUSGMVEgFNS BY SW YUCCA SO V SILVERBERUERSE9 EIAFAGOJGMISV AM SB H SFA BUCKTHOflN OIDES RH NEflHGIACI0E5 BOB SMWIHSIIMAC ANUSG RHUSGUBPP BE S44K4TG0NSERl9LESFARY AMELWCXIERNNIfIXN ST STS STAGXORN SUMAC RNUST SC SflIFA01N000i0NEA5LEli NSTER COTONEAS VARRC TUR 115 mREELEAFS1 RXUSTRLORATA&lTA aw. v.Rw w WAYFARING iREE FE VINRNUMI.ANTANA WSL WF51£RNSWG CHERRY PRUNUO PXUNUS BE9'EYI CN GIRLLFOUNFaNMW.IXAM' NUSLFDIFGLIUB CN COTOIEwYALLVN I SALA SLLIX FXIGUA PERENNIAL PLANTING LIST GROUND LOVERS. VINES. GROSSE,& PERENNIAL RONVERS, DOC OWAAF DOUBLE COREOP&B COREOPSISGRANDIFLM'SNNRAT 1GLLWNf BBF BURGUNW BWBIF GAILIAR0VXGNJ101FL0M'WRGUNDT 1G4 C0M. ftOWFR CPH NGPHLO% PHL0%SUBUTATA(WNRE,PNiPLE1. 1GALC0M. 0 RD REDDA LLY RE HEMERORWSSP. 1GAL GCM. SI IERMH SIBE T, CALC i DL LLA 'SIF11AVOR tl0R0DAYJLLY EMER CNWS HEME GAL CONI 1 A ASTER ASTEWRNPRIII 1GALCONf BE BIACKETFDSURN RUOBECIMMGIDA G C0Nf BF BWiKX LWLOM%GPANNMORA'BIINUNOf I GALC0NT.. C" CREE%NGNGPHUOPHLO% PH PHLO%SUBNATAWWK C T. = SSP SCPRLETWGLERPENB1EMg1 PENBTFAfON iA&ANS ON ' COM. SF SUIPNURMOWER ENOGONUMUMBELIAIIIM IGAl CQtt. PGF 1 PRAINEN MTIBIDAYELLOW IGA.,CONT. YSR ROSE T6LONSUSIIHR0SE MELNNIHEMUWSUNFLENEMUM'SIINFIEPf 1 COM, CY OJMMONWHIIEYAMOW ACHILLFAMILLEFIUM SALO M NBC NAl1VE0EE BLLM MONARRFRNLOSA OCAT, 1GLL. CONT BAG BLUEAVENAGPA4B HENLT0iRILN0HSFMPE4NRFN5 1GALCONT, MNUALC TM YELLOWMARGOLD TAGETESEVITA 1GAL. WM. PP PURPLE PETUNIAS PFTUNNSP, 1GAL. CONT RG REOGEWNSUM SERMNXSP. 1GAL. CONT. m FMRVME_HM MYOSOTRVLVATNA 1G4 CINR THIS REDHUSSARSALVN SALVLASPIENOENSWEDHUSYY 1G<LWM. RSD. RFDSNAppRgCW 0RRNHilRPLl4PURNRA5CEN3 1CAL CAM' CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1, ALL BLUEGRASS SOD AREAS ME TO RECEIVE 3BYARDSHM BY, OF SOIL PREPARATION MATCHING THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS TS% ORGANIC MATTER. 2MM CSVCM MT. SB PH RANGE 16:1 TO SO:I CARBON TO NITROGEN&MAGED MPJURE 2, ALL PLANTINGS BOB COMAMED WITH STEEL EDGMAREM BEM10.G4FDWIIH T DEPTH, 1109E CLEAN RIVER ROCK MULCH OVERW®CONROL FABRIC. . WENT BPMRE FORAPPRWAL PRORTO INSTALLATION 3. aOMUNNOCWERBFDSPRET0BEMULCHE0WRH 3'OEPM.SHRF➢OFOCEOMAHILCH. S BMITSAF0RMPR0VATOMMU0WBTALA1f0N aLPUMINGSBEDSa TOKMWMNEDBYINX% GREENIN1EWAfMMGT ST EDGES, VERS0N 0RAPPR0VED E0UALEl1GER0NLY C0NR24GT0Ri0BIIBMRBNAPIEFgiPFPMIVAL EDGMISWTNEOUIRE0WHEfl MISPDJALFNFMMRBGWWS,ORMM FENCE, EDGERWILLSEREONREDWHENa=ENTMO"Fr ULFENLE. 3. ALLTREESARE TO SESTAKEDORGUYEDPER0UF F0RAPERRXCf CNEYEM 6. REFERiOPVNSANO BPECIFlWPONSFOR FURRIERINFMIMRW RECAANNGIMM1<&APE INSTALUTCN. E TTORFPNRINIMES.PAWCEYT I mECONTRACTOEFOR W UBLICLILMDANOPRWATE PRNATEPROFERTT ON S\NGED P OUN MNOR RS ORffTNE EWCF ORBYIRU&C0MPACL0R50PEYATI0NSDUPINGMSTPLAII0N0RTIES'ECffffD MUNfENPNCEFEN00. CALL FORMIRYLOGTfSPRYJRTOANY IXG\VATION N%ANVSFIFJ➢OJNDOKKIS NMCT0RSFVJIRFP0RTAN 0 3. 0I.PMOR C IMMO PEPACH11EC1,PPo0RT0 WNTWUMGWI1NmE 0 mE IMME0L TH RINQUE PORTIONOFOFm R ORS CTORSHALLBEMSM NEBPONSIBLf FORRIEREPaRCPANYQ''RIEIRTRENGIES 9. E O CXVAT OR IXCAVATONS RNT SETRE ISIXPECTFJ11 LWiWIMAH0 T0Fg1ONmEWA]SCME iD. M GATION I MDIPWGATI0N AN0PIPNBPNDSPECIFMTO IFICATI0NBASCLQ56Y 0.5 F035BIE 11, DONOTDI RBmEMMNGPAVIW.LIGMNG,LMBS O.IXtIRICGATh4'•1HAT FXASTINGMJACENTM0 ESITEUNLFSSNOIFDONME%PMS. - 12. ALLTREE PITS INS0D0R NATNEARFA9MER)RECENF3'0FPINCf SHRFDDE0LIDM MULCH .NOWEEDCOMMOLFAMCOREOGMBM MIPEDINRB;SEMF 13, REMRT0m MGINEER4%ANSFORGMOIWSMWALKDRa RJPAM GRAM! ANDSTREVUGHTINF0RMATIONANDL0CATYJN. 14. 4LPFRFNNLL.ANNUAL,MDGRWN000VFRP NGSAAETOREOWULYBPACFL TREE NA5IPAEGNARSPACING,A1L51X11B E B USIN I I RLOT LY NGSBY SPNIES METOT0SE6E EOUALIYU %AMNGBBYSPECIESSPACFDU9NGRIEBPMANGTFESYCVM . ORTHERLAN. + P 15. TREELOONSTN RYOJFRIRRIG4MNlLINEE mEIANDSGFE DkPRM.TGRWILLHAVE R I TO MOVEfR IRRIWRONUNES UNFSIF IFmEY WFcRFFREW RECTPIAGENfNTOFIRFES - WM 16.ALLTREEi0BE0FBPECIMENWAVY. TOR0RRESPoN9BLET0REVIEW%MTM4IERXL W1m0WNEfl REPRECEMARVEPNgi10VIEU64 0E1lvFRYWBRE - 11. WNRACTORSPN,LSEEDALLRONCODDEDORSOMFISWNICHAREDISNRBFDBTWF WGRA M W(MMWESEMMIXUNLE35OmERMFEAgT mEPW j ~7~`~` i l`~ / BRICK COLUMN (ryp) -t LINE SEE SHE I 1 J I STREET TREE PROGr BY HOA. ONE TREE ER LOT i I j TRANSITIONAL FENCE BRICK COLUMN (TYP) I. +U. NORRSDULLEA PLwnvg terdasgNddMVe 25 INDUSTIAL AREA SKYI INF FSTATF naw.MCDM. oamer.Cdaemwml Fac so38421fes Pkro:30J BB211E6. SHEET 8 OF 61 S FII ING NO. 2 PDP TYPE B' BUFFERING REQUIREMENTS PROVIDED 6 FOOT HIGH SOLID MASONRY WALL OR SOLID FENCE WITH BRICK COLUMNS 6 FOOT HIGH SOLID SOLID FENCE WITH BRICK COLUMNS (SEE DE TAIL SHEET 9) 20'WtDE MINIMUM STRIP MINIMUM STRIP WIDTH 30 ONE TREE PER 30 LINEAR FEET OF BUFFER 633LF?30- 26 TREES 29TREES 0 15' M. so. &z I i N OR TH SCALE 1"=30'-O" - .]I I~VVNVVR BY HOA. ONE TREE PER LOT 1)( 3 SIGHT DISTANCE, ASSUMING 25 MPH STREET g aEZSSs a ~~Sa~a PERIMETER FENCE 'BRRII1 /TYP1,\ _ COWMN'(T PERIMETER FENCE\ BRICK COLUMN (TYP)\ SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO.2 PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN A PART OF THE W 1/2 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF ARVADA, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO LANDSCAPE PLAN - BRICK COLUMN (TYP)\ w' LU 2 Z' J ~ ~ \I .A~uDly)+; " ~ XJJVIVIIIVV r LANDSCAPE EASEMENT LINE INDUSTIAL AREA INDUSTIAL AREA LEGEND NATIVE SEED MIX : ARKANSAS VALLEY LOW GROW MIX SEEDING RATE: 25 LBS. PLSIACRE O DECIDUOUS TREE PERENNIALS AND GROUND COVERS ' TO 0E USED IN ALL DESIGNATED AREAS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON COMMON NAME EPHRAIM CRESTED WHEATGRASS THE PLAN %MD( 30 DWARF PERENNIAL RYEGRASS 25 90110 FESCUE SR3200 BLUE FESCUE 20 O D ORNAMENTAL TREE \ BLUE GRASS SOD NON-IRRIGATED NATIVE REUBENS CANADA BLUEGRASS CHEWMGS FESCUE 15 10 DECIDUOUS SHRUB GRASS SEED MOUNTAIN COBBLE 4-8" DIA . G NO 1 . MATCH COLOR FROM FILIN \ EVERGREEN TREE 3 RAIL FENCE (SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET) EVERGREEN SHRUB B'HT. PERIMETER FENCE AND COLUMNS. (SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET) ORNAMENTAL GRASSES NON-PERIMETER FENCING DETAIL NTS TYPICAL FRONT YARD LANDSCAPES SCALE 1"=20'-0" IpxwmENruaR - i I cauMxAxEVBtwuNTTrtE I FWNOAMIN% 'IIG$ Q. yppEiPEEUWN MN]MUM SPMING40C PROPERTYUNE\ - WIXGFEN OETACHEp SRVIN% FWNOALONPIANNNGS.j II OFNEI S1RFfT PROPERIYIIN( 4Yy1pElNEEIAWN oxlouoESmFta NORFJS DULIFA IxmEEUwx ' axEPFxun i i Plenrt"q _ ilNw.,lum o.ma;c"wnmmxN Fu' 30S U92 11B5 Plwne:3Pt0931165 SHEET 9 OF 69 euYI INIF FSTATFC FI INir NCl 9 PPP r FtN s wr sbvm w Rau IJyVpNL s F.I LOT OVp61s unv IgTPlI ma smE Or rEU(.v.G PLa+G srE uu FESn PR 'u S. PUNVIRVPENGNGUMM PFAIMEfERFENCE m smGNUFFN. v BRIC%GIXIIMN SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 2 PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXISTING TREE LEGEND A PART of THE w 1 /2 of SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 9 WEST EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED CITY OF ARV DA,000NTYOF JEFFERSON, STATE PRINCIPAL 'IAN, + LANDSCAPE PLAN kit 1223 / E'4 ~ / _ / E£ 24 252 - 27 28 umnmww Fraarrrr,.._JJ _ - i ~y_ _64's - I 1 5 4 f s+ rll / 12 f I . / j i bY,a. / i 11 I I/k i / II111I I ' % I / I1 11fi ~ i / I 1Ii' i ~ II I11,II I 1 i I / 1 l f ~ I 56 / 0 i r I , 2 13 EXISTING TREE INVENTORY ID# TREE TYPE M. TRUNK REMARKS 7 ELM TREE 10' SINGLE-STEM FAIR 2 ELM TREE 10, SINGLE-STEM FAIR 3 ELM TREE IT SINGLE-STEM FAIR 4 ELM TREE 6' SINGLE-STEM FAIR 5 ELM TREE 6' SINGLE-STEM FAIR 6 ELM TREE IT SINGLE-STEM FAIR 7 ELM TREE 5' SINGLE-STEM FAIR 0 ELM TREE 8' SINGLE-STEM FAIR 9 ELM TREE IV SINGLE-STEM FAIR 10 ELM TREE 6' SINGLE-STEM FAIR 11 SERVICESERRY 12'HT. SINGLE-STEM FAIR 12 ELMTREE 410 SINGLE-STEM FAIR 13 MULTI-STEM COTTONWOOD 3112' MULTI-STEM FAIR 14 CRABAPPLETREE r SINGLE-STEM FAIR 15 CRABAPPLE TREE 4' SINGLE-STEM FAIR 16 ELM TREE 412' SINGLESTEM FAIR 17 ELM TREE 311? SINGLE-STEM FAIR 10 ELM TREE 312 SINGLE-STEM FAIR 19 CRABAPPLE TREE 3' SINGLE-STEM FAIR 20 CRABAPPLE TREE 212' SINGLE-STEM FAIR 21 MULTI-STEM ELM TREE 91/? MULTI-STEM FAIR 22 MULTI-STEM COTTONWOOD 2T MULTI-STEM FAIR 23 COTTONWOOD 712' SINGLE-STEM FAIR 24 C07ONWODD 67" SINGLESTEM POOR 25 SEWTCEBERRY 12 SINGLE-STEM FAIR 26 COTTONWOOD 612' SINGLE-STEM FAIR 27 COTTONWOW 12' SINGLE-STEM FAIR a C070 MOOD it SINGLESTEM FAIR 29 COTTONWOOD IT SINGLESTEM FAIR TOTAL CALIPER INCHES OF TREES V OR GREATER 234.5' THAT WILL BE REMOVED FROM SITE 1 TREE MITIGATION CHART TYPE 8: BUFFERING NON-RESIDENTIAL I RESIDENTIAL EDGES REQUIREMENTS PROVIDED 2345 CALIPER OF TREES TO MITIGATE 132(T) CAI. DECIDOUS TREES THE TREES BEING REMOVED=117(?) /16' TYPE S: BUFFERING NON-RESIOENTIAL/RESIDENTIAL 29 EVERGREEN AND _9 EDGES-NE TREE PER 30 LINEAR FEET OF DECIDUOUS TREES BUFFER. 833LF130= 28TREES REQUIREMENTTOTAL 161 TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES PROPOSED FOR PROJECT 203TREES 'a CL FACN 1W."R F`W NORJUS moll" DULLEA wenm9 umoareaaaemav 710W lt1 oe.'Otaa M)i 0 49 BO' 160' Pom1a: ]09341169 NORTH SCALE 1'=80'-0° SHEE T 10 OF 61 SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL N.T.S ~F x TREE PLANTING DETAIL N.T.S. ~ xa Y 6' PERIMETER FENCE & BRICK COLUMN DETAIL N.T.S. PERIMETER FENCE TRANSITIONAL FENCE ffi,,W 4UMN I 2 SAM M3CAPEPIANFOPFFNCMA~ EN10 C MLMATN PNNT F10RMD MOPTMTO FUW.OWMN3 W FlLING N0.1 1 PgIXTWWGfENCEIO MATCXiWNONO i. 3 RAIL FENCE- N.T.S. xw aasssaml I ~{P k \ T IIA1- r A I u t 0 v v a i N N ~ M P W U Z N ~ V) U C y 0w H 0 w 0~ m ~ U W Za SO Z 7 m ~-i O W G `c m O N ~ a ~ o c W ~S zzo=~c~ 0 o c_ n m o o < o ° 0 3 Y~ y o rt c r 5 0 s 3 ~ m°o m F s o - m rt~ o m O a m ai m m z W m o. O 3 o5~ : - m O a m O W o a O - N _ ~ A o vv ~o e ~W o ? a W e p mN °O - u O 3 O 0 w 9 m o O O o.0 v i m O' o 03 ~ o N3c ~f N ~ q S N 0 d D r r z„ _9 d „'m = m 9 0 o .0 o F m d ~ y o 'o I - T n ~s i sland >o 0 ~-o df. C a - - d - a° O m O m 'm m ~ u 3 v m 0 0 'o o~ o fo Em o _ N ~ ~jl ry NO Nn0 N0-' i ~ ~ o boo - V 1 v r + i l o L v m 1 ' O i 'y ~ ~"zJ 2 ff. C n ~ C p~~ _ T ~ 2. 3.c y i a 7 c m 7 2 o F ~'c 0 L S> (l O G K 7 ti G 7 m 1 Q> > Q d 'S'6 rt ~ ~ 5 n s 2 ~x ~ n o ~ O n 0 cn w A w 0 v 0 v00 ~N M a W U Z N N 0 0 0 0 W Z 0 Z co 7:; X O G O 9 N W O v W .V T "a 0 c v v a~ .ocyB~ ~a v'c 7' y a~oa o m x n ~ d =y N F o a~ p 3 n S x o y ~ " y o o v 7 m n o ~ o ao~ o~ v r3 o~ u~ o ~ 3 0^ 7 0.~ A O s m y ^ 0 T n~ o a. d r a 10 m~ - a o ~ I ` L 1 19 O ~ I 1 gl I _ ~ N wa ~ JI n v ~a d o d F 13 ma 0 0 - 3 O ¢a d ' m~ i~' off. o; - I N N O O d o v So d ~ N d _ p m ~ d O a s Q O A m K n d ll o _ x d ~ O m m in° O m ~ q O.. o° O N ~ N = m , " 3 v n. o ~ ~ ~ v o' r~o ~ v,~ 3 F n = y c ry v a. ~ _3.» T~ y o-v, 3 sa° n.' ry ~xya o T o'.? O w v W ~ 0 n 0 0 v° x~ ~ ^ M v 1 U W W z v N 0 m O'n l1J QJ V Z W D D co Ef~1~ v , 3 O 3 0 S1, a o - 3 3 0 0 v w V v Y ~A 9 ti a 0 v w E O O 5 y ^O y v v e a H y Oc~Nm 0 g o o v y 7 N g c o m ~ v o~ o ~ti a3 o ~ ~ c an ~ y 9 F F 3 a 3 m j 0 a o` m m m a „o 0 3 a a u N 0 r h~ F-~ 7 w o~ 0 n O D nawo n t3;- =mr m0 F IIF =om' < YI _mo ~ i O ll - _v ~ P3 n _;3r :Z i= ND ~nv o0 3 c~ d i~ o noo ass 4 c a a m a 0 3 r r 0 m T 0 0 a v u a ~ o h ~ O o + PL O m < m n P _.c -O m f, "'ova ty Tov _ C o n 7 A m? ry G S P v LL m n c ~ n ' 0 0 v m b-O o v ~ x G te~I i e tl I ~ 'I 1---I O b~c Z J ' O W .t T iy i i 2 s t 1 A+ P~ G O W nb 1 t.;g t ;F i~ tY j t a Y i, 't - _ i mzos~oz m o o l~ J ti 3"3 H a'~a'o ,<Q r c o` v o ~ ~ ~ 3 v p o _ ^ ~ 2 v o m n ° ~ _ m o y p ~,a e 9 T h o ~ v 7 g F ? s a p m o ry E S E. y 9 ~ T ~ o 0 I o O ~ a 0 0 J 7 N N w w a CO WCO 0 O 3 ~T d ~ o „ r II O N mid °"0 II n.~ O~ 0 b'O I m 0 n ` I 3 ,e 3 F 1 O F - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 0 ~o oa0 d 'o O ~ v _ov 3 o " d N 0-11 o_' i I I ~ a u I _ y 1o w o : o. 'w_ 3~ II W ° ° m _ ao ? G m 1 ° 3 I Jy ill II I I O n IFT N <m 3 0 O 3 _ m of < 9 _md d N S d --o--~ OO O - o 30 d ~ {p3 ^ d N d N O N N d 0 C J O I O Q ,N s, N o ° O 3 I O I U I O I I O 1 I orn I _ I -Oo I m£ I ~ 1 mo 3v d n O ,y T m v s v ' f 3 a rc 3 E? y~ o' x c - m 3 3 z v E c 7 3~ W 'S ~ i1 J 00 7 _ ry ~ pm H ~ 1 to J y n~ n_ S N p4 ~ 'J v ~ O ~ W ~ n 0 .7 0 v 0 V M tn o ~ N v ~ x • a a. w m D U a S 75 W O v W 0 c ~ 3 o ~ r ~ m m O O [t] v~ ._1 c :n ; c a C i ^m m ~ y ~ y x G~~ae~o'v c o c m~ i S o~~ 0 3 y O S~ ~ p, L O ry n O y o a ry a m E 3 i a y a' p c Q o d 2 3 M Q ~ s ~ 0 7 P ° c m y 3 F F ~ 9 y C p O - F n O v n F O N f o° F mp v~ a n O Foro- O T nm0 3 O 9 O b ,b n_N i .Ni N w o_ y m ' ? " a. s n c-° a '3 y. a d v ~ y 3 H n. ~ ~ f = 5 p w c o x .a a y = s~ 3 a~ T y. 'c 3 N y a3a y y a' C y OO v N Q O 6 N p y= p0 F y O ~ O O O _ Tn~, - ~ 9 c aw ~ y ~ H C S O O v" 9" a- ro 0 m _ F D O O O ° rv L7^ d y o O O o D~ a a tri a °m m ~x N n 7 N y O Op n 0 V v v O I v M U w V L V 0 0 m 2 w Z Z "Co fib °o 3 Cr'y/~1 V v W v W ~g I tv } I c a `y c 7i I ti 'T j O T W ~ v V V ~ V mo O@ z' O v X., 37 ya~a'o ,~u'om y ~ o v V y - o o ~ _ v T w a ~ o 0J~ p O Q °3 7c 0 a~ aw g ~ o = 7 n O O - n ~ 7 O Cf c m m O r ,n O 0 W - n o~w w , poi O wo , yo ~w O a 0 .3 xw 00 c, m0 mn0 O ~ e'O 3 w 4 J T O N ~ n ~ CG CG G rD O N S a ~ v~ S^ S v~ T O r T, 4. V C r' ° ry.T ~ y O ^o ~x 7 O ~ n 0 n 0 V v v b~ v~ x co O W U Z 0 N N 0 0 0 K O] (D 99 Z 07 0 r)r d-~ W S S O N W [G ~J I O W TZO='?O'? ~y3~yo? c o ~ Y o n n 0. ; v ~m E_ 9 'm an c j F 3 g 'c a ~ o a < _ g 3 0 2n ~ ~ n o m ~ F m 9 z ^ n~ a e m d9 3J_ N 3 ny of p - O° < nmmg m: a C a m' v O O o m w3' "s c a 4 o O a m`p m a O a o ' m ~ o a £ n _ m _m _o m O ~0 c „o eo m m3 °w r N _ ~ Om w 08l n r J N W I I - _ _I I I Ym m a v O H O ~ O a mmm ~ m 3 "-a ay - o° om 0 0 p c v a ~ - -m O U L od9 O W m R I O O 3 ' a a F J m _ A E7 a 0 m 0 1 m _N -0 ' 'o eo : o Y 03 N N a r -n O a c m ~ a ~ n a m - v m ° m v 0 CG G (D O n A n O uIII a-- OI o I so 0 m I n 0 O a a c m r N m~ J S 3 J. 2 3G Z < J r v n I\ V~ ~x N O ~ n C 0 v 0 uo ND ~ "r z En O w 5 O e: S rr, w J moo S u cn Q r~ V J w w szo5"3c? c v ~ Y N O O 1 :o L I \ J O ° tnml Io - d y G O y 3 `G y a O C N I< O1 i 0.m O~ ~ ~ 00 0 ~m i nT o;v 0 n g w"`, h w 'w m L fu F O Y ~ .i T u. w ~ y ac c o c f n ~ son a y 3 £ ~ £ N 9 a - -19 OT I I C n~ ~ o mo I ~ J I I I o d I I I m 0 F m o 0 j~ ~ m ~ I m~ I I alp F I I I I O a 0 rJ m o! m (n -o n 0 J n moo a m o c 3Qw °O s m O p tU of ° T a I . o ~o wl I m O w ° ~ J n °1 ~m n~ fF o CO ~ n w o 0 0 3 mo E ,m I o F S 00 COO v w " Master ww a m < Bath *Z F w ~ snm s w a ' EE n- X n R ^ EL rD rD - G f' ' v O N p . y 'O -6 i J i1 'O . n< J J - !'1 - Z m J rlo v=~ n 2~ b 7 y~ n r ~ o' _ W ~ ~ m" r O y ~ O O ~ n O 7 0 v v a ~o M P W U Z V) L 0 0 m x r t S a , ` y \ ej I A ~I `•~t3 L ` S n4 JP~~~j ~ I~ , it f ~ \h~ c ;1~ itl~ r• ; IBC ` 1 _ ~JJ' ~J w ~ ' Y J 1 a ,a.jma"nN ~o~oa~ o Po mvmo 0 ^ o x o < ~ o o v v ' oor~~o 3~,^<0' g- ~ v m a a c R T c " o i o ~ m ~ ~ T vt° m F. 9 „ro u 91 0 o a ? ~ F 3 o ~ ~ 3 ^ a'~ a ? c n ~ n.`G Y 3 ~ O 41 n ~ T y ~ $ C ~ ^ n ~G _ co 0 <O -"6 N w N M p C a ~ d y D o o ` ' wp" co N m0 dog ago y ma o CL W co , W 6 0' E~ CL cu :0- o 0. oi_O. d 03 % 0 y c);N W n p 0 L) N 0 m 3 y N 0 j < N ~ rp m - r - O TO p a a o O n m' m - m d x ~ -O m~ W 0 x W o ~ - m O ° O o -C I I °n O ^2 (C -10 x 0 m 3 {O co I_ - - - Z Ill V O O _.-m=~ ~_3 goo o•7-s__~v m ^ 6 i ? C ' i O. m O Spa 'O "t f ~ J ' c .T vY'~ _ o rorov ' EL 0 f 3 F c g c o a' v 5¢ Z ? S v o- C. 3 -oi ? c 5 0 o n. m y y T g i R 2. g: c v p0 c' ~ ~ 3 rr ~ 5= 'J ~ o. o ~ n O n V~j w O w m 0 v v~ vti x c: co L P W U Z N 0 0 K m W Z V z 0 CO W O +J V) Na) P9 N W v n: N G ~ o c 41 i t gbP~NN~ N a ~a p o i ti c o Q v N n ~ o o v v gcm3~<c Y~ o ti j1H C n o = - o ~ 0 E-4 o 'moo 'o E.3 'p n 1 3 c s o ~ = 3 R a~ 2, 0 n 3 O 2 T C J O m m 50 m W O O N _ n 3 O 0 o I ~ I m I 9I1 FTJ m Im hm OI I o' I I o a°o 0 O J w w n w O w w N O a 0o 00 °o w o O m a a o w w O a O Q~ Q w m N N ~ - = cry c. a f n. ~ c .o c _ c v. ~ a ' ~ v T o nw F W rt O r~ 7 w. O` dG o ~ 0 n 0 v 0 v~ ~ N N Z Q Y O V O F iC O a 0 r~ r r~ v J 0 v W U 0 N W o T cry o > ~+G v a a ^AC ~ C Z C G C v m x_ CL N Q 0 0 CS G S m m d_ n a 3 zI mo 3° m~ o e £ q O CD n n N a d 0 d_ m m 0 7 C7 d N 8m~ yx05 z a3u *O~ fd ~ O 0 d W - ? =r SS W 0 0. 0 0 F'p 8m o~ mnr- :p0 -0,:! mp 5 4i5 3 S 7 p O 0.-~ p O p n < a z ry o m 3,~ o`,~ o v" c a r N N m _m O m4j xo0 N ~ 9m a~ m; ~m ~m V m ~ p m c~ " O G H S N p O n x 0 O i a~ a o y „ O 'S O •d. N C .v.' O r~ 2 9 L S.-1 y Y ~ O N ff. d p y f9 _ ~ m o i rt y9 _ P y o 9 O y \ I V O ~ 1 FT 03 ` s f 1 \sI Ask da ~e Ask d Aft A %NJ km ^^Vll ~ r. n n 0 0 odkir v 0 u m N E r Y 4 O U O F a O s a 0 m O 7:~ 0 9 N W U G 0 W ~ry 0 o~ s~ c u d 7 mm O .II O d W O CL O O 3 A m -A va 'O ~o "3 a om a x'o "3 OWN ~x°^e mo you 3p4 08 co, iho9 - - - - - - - - - - I - - - F-H m N 0 0 3 O d O S C n da O O 3 N m mo 0 v3 N Ni v~ C O-9 D xo, N a= m u o3a n'c lD •a' emm .a O b ~ o ~ - y~~ V55 ® S~ m ma - I W rp -n J -O S b~ ~Q y3 O] x3 mW Zm v_3 N r \-J °lo 00, 09 e r w 4 A Jow low A ~a Ank m~ l-I r ry _ 'n?mc'~T°5 c'v~sa~n n ry3~3 ~,~o~,~'o 6LL ~ ~ x cLL 9 ~ y - C c m~ y N _ y c o o C a a 3 ' 6 0 e v. m y y0 S n ~ a~ Q 6 3` i p o ru w n o o£ o. o g r o n z N m~ I`n y~ ~ v , c .e u u^ a n 3 0 ° n s a c m a m F ~ o o a y - O 7 W ~ n O n 7 0 V v U ~ ~ N N cf~ G iQ L O U Z O F a 0 z 0 Q G O N W v O N W .c ~W v~ vE ya V ~ C0 c c ~ u v P 80/ oo/ m]~r ~zC oA~ ' E~ x00 < ' ° ~O G 3 '00 3 S ® men, . a __=31 f=-.i ~ 0 n oZ o v o m .1n. C1 m n CD v~ -I r° cc 2 c ~u ~ ° ar ° ;a o ,o 8 o EE o xo _ Fo v A u N ap %OO CD N CD and :8 _ CD ® z - - 1 -F l _ o x n N Z O^ ET 5 R C 9 G c' a' g'Ogm~°oB 0.~~~v3 zR_~ m ~ 0 0. . 0.~ m y v. ,r ?f.'a mad 23 v'. EE o ="c ~w S m n o s~ n y F f T~v ~ o Bm~~Tys o m ry 9 ■r ~m l~J i mW i ~ I 1 Rvl 30 1M w 08~ _ - A U3 \ I Aft %4J had \-J R G -V rho : C n is - w E v~j E a a0 C0 ~3 y a7 mm C a Z N m~ n~ m m n v p, ~ D ^ m . d h = - [ TI ~ S S ~ ~ b ~ H~ O 7 N ~ cNn cn n 0 0 V v O U 00 ID O N - (n G F Y L Q d O U L O O L pie -I--+ 7~ 91 V d m e w O 7 n ~C Q Q (7 co n N N mj 3 `o= m00 a32 .w d N N n b d N ~ v r CD aN ay mN ~O as ; 4 O o~ fT 4y O = a o nm ~o mw m> £l i r LJ y-! ® PW- 00, WW ~iloo J r rw WO mm \-I A Ii ma~ Mai 01111114 Nw l I 010 y J n_f SN~ C n 00 flO o. CI- N a W '0 d 'a C1 m 0oav CD S is ~ l u _ o m o w ' ~ Q w or u0 m3 N 3l 80 ~ _ ill N r~ It < d m9 3 c ~ v0~ _r° m s ZN5G i _ ~gSy ~TxJ _ n c 3^ i ~'~~oSEavx ?_''cm c~ CE 7 rya a=:`3 = w v a ~ •mii ' OG n a S II. a ~ .O ~ m ~ i a n v o O O V cn n 0 o': v 0 U m ,J m ~ o N cn C. iz Q o. O V O F O A m 0 ~-I W O 9 W 'c r N o C u C ~ U O E C W E a c E' E o Y o n b ~ o O 4 0 m v 4 LO F N Qv L0 a'm 3 av r ar m r r W r Oak Alk ~qw A A VdA d ~ C ^ °S' n. Dc tip ° a° . a v fD O 3 c ' ' 9 w ^ c~ s _ s. m m fl. T g ~ < 3 v LL ' ( A' 3 ' a 2 ti c m ? m v rt o o 3 0 3 . ° o av 'o ~ ~o _ a j G 3 o , o ~ m y c o c S ? w 6 c o. z' N ~ z G S O S I s s d z u O ' a_ NOO Oro-i L NOs 90" dp F _ ° ' ~ - m mm o . i rri O N a w (7 0 n 7 u v uo y~ Y d 0 v z 0 F Y O L D m 3 0 W mm o U u ~ o r yi 1 C W r V C U v r m 'm G 3 0 P` ._y O~ - Opp w W.--, N0 I--I Dw o N ID d p ry ~ m a° n o I I - ~ •W n m mn D C _ O ° ~ 3 r 0 1° ~ £ w p r O ' Up o m o mm o w y p m I =x ~ = uN n~ O nom. - N 001 - N O a 0 y w O o rc ~p ZPJ, 33-~'_O_zu s n z c _ O 00 N y m0 mn° .Qo ° a-p 3 w r l~J AAy Ae•A 090, 00 A W W A l~J Oak we l~J = 2 = C ~ z _ r, n r - ¢ ` y n r. - y o a < ~ m n 2 x v v. w n 3-` x° o n p4 d 0. n O 00 r~- O .T n O n 7 0 v v 0 u~ ~o a o. F 0 v z 0 F m 0 m 0 0 O V) k, V v L o ~c W r° 0 v W na 00 3m w 3 nw WF~ °F d0 w OO N - O-N c o v J O v N R o mo m m m ° o J F o m ~ v m m _ m 0 W a -n c a w0 "O o3 m m 3 . m N ~ m a5 eo o G)w a8 w ~ O r - ' I I ~ J I _ _ I _ N I I _ _ I - o 'Il 5 9 I~ d I~' IIIIIIIpIIIB[LLrr m 9 ~4 O m ~ o w J ~ w O v 0 J w C~ G O v, n n N N =zo,-5~ ?q~z- sV ' - 3 - - F c ~ n ~ ~ 3 g 3 b J r m m li 0I _w $°o ~ I ' d l Q~ I O O Jw c m m r lam! d V 1 Q0 d 0114 4' Oak .y~ A qI mm L-A z e o C N ~ O ammo cad N O m O A _ d 3 v m _ 8m ad 00 N OmG, o~ O d v n J m aa o O mm c o J O J o3 m ~ o m m A 0 m ~a m O ~a e°o ~ eo m3 03 N tJ 0 T~ 1 V ~ a N W n 0 0 V N U o c cn c. O F O O r~ r ~-1 0 V J O ~ ~J (J _ n o I v w n ~ m'w_ I I I ~JO o~ ml `G N on C~~ L7 O a p~ 0 s N v m f m 0 j m o N a I On w w - F m o o l F I I 0 a 7 m d _o 0 n M O O o c 3 o v O a O p N S G C~ G 0 O n N N a c c 'z O j o~ 3 0 o z _ ~r•: ~ v, vu ry 2 y m ~ 3 ~.o S v c Q, a n p 5 m ~a ~Oo m3 N T o N a a O N ~ ~ w C. m a I I m II II or II 'p mb I I o1p II of dal v o m m I ~ p I m d o n °1 aw F £ a ~ 0 om w - 'o 0 a h m N m N odp "O A m3 Z gwW ~am6u N °^'ON °$m5~ 00 ~0 o F S Coo a <a m m rQv m ~ N - j N m~ o V ~ H~ CD v ~ d n4 w S• N 45' i 0 N r 9 C T ICW y® PEW maw rs' and 90 r ~N A l d A A A ae bmg lid n m 'a c v' T n o' S w -i< = H= Y _ 6 ~ O G v T n ~ O y w T ~ n R m 5 cc 5 6y ry a.F C m ~ ~.C 5'v c: ow _ ti c _ 5 c 'o x T- 5 a 5 0 _ 6 c. H o n 0 i v v cn o cn CJ r~ i®r V Adliro" z O H fL O Y 0 ~-I W r° :E o d d W mO ~ y °0 0 -v T» 0 3 o m d N F ~ J ~ C W v /y f W L' 'Ift A w Alk Ak yt L-A O.; U x m o -a m : o O 4 CG CG G Q n n m N o." 'a a 5 ti- w o u ELI ~~E. is c sf sn- mss,: cdcTn"°'`3 ^o~:'d so oSa `<~3 v~ ~ R _ w 2. 7, w n - a B x o o. . ~ n~ o ~ Q D v o T u r a. rc o c_ y x o g ~..o o y o s v v y y c ry .T 7¢ x a .ate, H s s~ v, 3 ~ v e+ 3 ,s n i n e r w 7 v S O C °'x6 ~ o 3 m 7 m ~ a o m o o CD o cn m r- 0 V v O U C Now Z Q L O V r O F m O Not O m 7 U P ~A lv k u O v w P z o-' tt; =i Y F„ i :,e t9! k ig f s £il , is 1\ i c c a `c d r m f m m 0 n 0 s 3 m d MEW 00, v 1 A Md A AA d AEk Ask ye sv G ` G C G ~ f ~ ~ , ~ y ' T G „ p O ~ d ~ _ ~ a ~ u'OD S 3 •u'• " '?J~ 0 G ry 5',0 N S Cdr n 7 N ~n O n 7 c c O i. C y i• y ~ t _i e I flyl r fir' 7' - r~ k • now a Q 0 U O F O L fL A O bA C v W P: ~Z 1 ` Y ` !z e ~ . iYV 4 i w W ~bf ii e L ; ~ L I- Z Y z~ I . G Y ~i rs Z OO = n o 3 ac °3~ 0 0~ 3 Y o _l ry~ -c ^ o v o n s _ 2 o o ? c n n w ' o ~a 9 Sv o~ v F y sg ~3 0 0 ~ c 3 ~ o a rya F ~ 3 g s c c o - 0 I I O a L7 0 w ~ m ~ W m n w I I ,I II 11 4 1I II II J., N d fiI m IC !G$ a 6 o O O n. O n CA n O a~ o O w w w w a a W W n s o F o 3 ~ d I o - < r ~ I 'y I~ I I m J u ~ I mll I xl0 I n ~ 37 I m O O a : 3 F 1 O A S ° ~ O IV ~A oat p O n O Q 3 0 _ w = , ll I u _ r a a - I Y I ~ ~I 'EJ71~ ;v .e o9 _ _ Co _ a NO n ° N 0 0 7 n w 3 o o o 3 0l / II I 1 I- - ,db 0 1 _ _ V j T - -T T N~ IEI 0 mn ' NZ mo no:0 -O m - om f.iO 1 o "x o 3 ? vm3 m m-af a ~ o n- co - N - m N S~ a ~ a ° p 0 - 3 010 U I O I I I a i I n n I mE mj I as 3a O m m = 'J _ ci 'C 5 'O_ Z S L O < T C5 7 e5 3 ~o- - s y v E= s s~~ T I~ 1r-i rt ~x n O n Melody's decorated model homes are located in the following neighborhoods: PLEASANT VALLEY in Longmont Alpine St. & Ute Hwy. 66 (303) 485.5550 Celebration & Heritage Series: • Lindell - multi-level (2230 sq. ft) • Washington Park - ranch (2043 sq. ft.) • Cedar - multi-level (1347 sq. ft.) • Silverthorne - two-story (1700 sq. ft.) • Sierra - two-story (1680 sq. J) SAVANNAH in Frederick GRAND OPENING Hwy. 52 (Dacono Exit) & Weld County Rd. 15 Traditions Series: (303) 833-4197 Cottage Series: (303) 833.1525 Cottage & Traditions Series: • Longview - two-story (1491 sq. ft.) • Derbyshire - two-story (1285 sq. ft.) • Winchester - two-story (1145 sq. ft) • Fairhaven - two-story (1080 sq, ft.) • Silverthorne - two-story (1700 sq. ft.) • Osage - two-story (1357 sq. ft) • Huron - multi-level (1426 sq. ft.) • Pawnee - two-story (1685 sq. ft.) • Keystone - multi-level (1604 sq, ft.) RIDGEWOOD HILLS in Fl. Collins EXPANDED HERITAGE & NEW CLASSIC SERIES College Ave. & Trilby Rd. (970) 229.5692 Metro # (303) 466-3580 Heritage & Classic Series., • Silverthorne - two-story (1700 sq. ftJ • Keystone - multi-level (1804 sq. ft.) • Washington Park - ranch (2067 sq. ft) • St. James - two-story (2640 sq. ft.) • Glenwood - two-story (1870 sq. ft.) • Manitou - multi-level (1507 sq, ft.) • Canyon - ranch (1375 sq. ft.) CHERRYWOOD PARK in Thomton 138th Ave. & Colorado Blvd. (720) 872-0230 Celebration Series: • Spruce - two-story (1108 sq. ft) • Cedar - multi-level (1347 sq. ft) • Sierra - two-story (1680 sq. ft.) • Keystone - multi level (1804 sq. ft.) NORTHBROOK in Thornton East 138th Ave. & Holly St. (720) 929-9662 Heritage Series: •Silverthorne - two-story (1700 sq. ft.) • Glenwood - two-story 1870 sq, ft.) • Lindell - multi-level (2230 sq. ft.) SUGAR CREEK in Brighton NEW SUMMIT SERIES Bromley Lane & South 34th Ave. (720) 685-3102 Summit Series: • Humbolt - ranch (2087 sq. ft) • Belford - multi-level (2255 sq. ft.) • Windom - two-story (2346 sq. ft.) • Shavano - two-story (2624 sq. ft.) • Seneca - ranch (1665 sq, ft) RIVER RUN in Commerce City NEW SUMMIT & TRADITIONS SERIES 112th Ave., East of Hwy. 85 (303) 227.0636 Summit & Traditions Series: • Eldora - two-story (2033 sq, ft) • Manitou - multi-level (1507 sq. ft.) • Lakota - two-story (1251 sq, ft.) • Hopi - ranch (1362 sq. ft.) THE FARM in Arapahoe County NEW CLASSIC SERIES Arapahoe Rd. & South Buckley Rd. (720) 870-6388 Classic Series: • Broadmoor - two-story (3251 sq, ft.) • Stanley - ranch (2585 sq. ft.) • Teller - two-story (2927 sq. ft.) SADDLE ROCK RIDGE in Arapahoe County GRAND OPENING Smoky Hill Rd. & South Riviera Way (303) 627.6216 Celebration Series: • Redstone - ranch (1605 sq. ft.) • Sierra - two-story (1680 sq. ft.) • Keystone - multi-level (1804 sq. ft.) i MANZANITA in Parker Stroh Rd. & Motsenbocker Rd. (303) 841-1649 Celebration Series: • Keystone - multi-level (1804 sq. ft.) • Canyon - ranch (1375 sq. ft.) • Cedar - multi-level (1347 sq. ft.) • Manitou - multi-level (1501 sq. ft) • Telluride -ranch (1670 sq. ft.) CASTLEWOOD RANCH in Castle Rock LARGE LOTS - 30 FT. BETWEEN HOMES Ridge Rd. & Mikelson Blvd. (720) 733.1905 Celebration & Heritage Series: • Silverthorne - two-story (1700 sq. ft.) • Eldora - two-story (2033 sq. ft.) • Washington Park - ranch (2043 sq. ft) • Lindell - multi-level (2230 sq. ft.) • Tabor - two-story (2505 sq. ft) WOODMEN HILLS in Colorado Springs ONE-HALF ACRE PLUS LOTS Woodmen Rd. & Meridian Rd. (719) 495-6300 Heritage Series: • Glenwood - two-story (1870 sq. ft.) • Eldora - two-story (2033 sq. ft) • Washington Park - ranch (2043 sq. ft.) • Oxford - two-story (2358 sq. ft.) • Tabor - two-story (2505 sq. ft.) RIDGEVIEW at Stetson Hills in Colorado Springs NEW COTTAGE SERIES COMING APRIL 2002 Powers Blvd. & Stetson Hills Pkwy. (119) 550-0818 Celebration & Heritage Series: • Canyon -ranch (1375 sq. ft.) • Cedar - multi-level (1347 sq. ft.) • Walden - two-story (1336 sq. ft) • Keystone - multi level (1804 sq. ft.) • Manitou - multi-level (1507 sq. ft.) • Spruce - two-story (1108 sq. ft.) e Silverthorne - two-story (1700 sq. ft.) • Telluride - ranch (1670 sq. ft.) SKYLINE ESTATES in Arvada 56th Place & Oak St. (720) 898-5514 Heritage Series: • Glenwood -two story (1870 sq. ft.) • Washington Park - ranch (2043 sq. ft.) • Oxford - two-story (2358 sq. ft.) • Tabor - two-story (2505 sq. ft.) I CUSTOMER SERVICES MELODY MORTGAGE 11031 Sheridan Blvd. Westminster, CO 80020 (303) 439-2511 DESIGN CENTER 11031 Sheridan Blvd. Westminster, CO 80020 (303) 785.4040 OPEN HOUSE: Saturday 8 am -12 pm Thursday 3:30 pm - 6 pm Melody Homes Inc. BUILDING NEIGHBORHOODS SINCE 1953 2121102 Rendering of map is artist's conception and does not show exact distances. It is intended to give only general directions to each Melody neighborhood. All square footages am approximate. zn Z Q s w \ re~ 0 O x 04 00 P7 x H H W z W L W W N L6 LO U) Ln Er) T N M O N Lc) N N N N w L6 N N N n co L6 > CM w VJ 49 fA fA to fn 44 fn to N n (gy o a U > W 0: 0 U CO E c O- ' L O > - w - C a) : -E >O O LO E c M 7L .0 OW U L M L v o 'o« U ; LL 6 ? .3 ui c mN ' L L (n > LL O L N LL.fl LL ~ N N U- C N Q E N c :Foci a co a c aT Q L a Q N N (n N LL OE mE N CO a a N ca co E d o ~m LL N M O d 6, IL Y H T a c N C C c a a)~ L Q^ ^ d' LL -`Oy LLCaI > m e m L c 0 O O N V a CO ° a~ Q c c ) a) a) cc (D ° c m e o a 0 E L c 0 - N CO -O Co a o f p v1 ^ 0 O n Co c L a a) T n a N E 'c O C O 0 Co c O LL N. a) o m tq a a) N j x L r O . jya LLa y.O cu a) .0 LL L d ~N C N N i6 a)~y yE yN~ 0 -0 tO co Tea 0) m0 co- c E9 -C. c0- 'ca m 'v o wL r L C TCV -O M y w x N ll LL LL c LL m a) nd >,a Ta E E w^ Co ~-o ~a N c co M E E ooa iO~ w5 N E m E X 0 m° a ? a1 N E N O Q a NON co Co N O C ~ c co O C O O c a E ca - N M E= O T E C N C c y E O N E O N O°-. a O E N E a O O O O O It c 0 O z N C Y "00 = O O N N O N N Q N N~ o a O O O_ 0 9 a E M N N N 'O N m O ca ONE CU M N 0 a_ a °-~m °.Z m o02`m °-N E Qc X 0n cm~L Ecm E.°0 E~ 9 d~ aN_o ¢N~ ° CL ¢ 0-'•0 a~ co o oaL a °.t0o~ 'Xm`as 0Nm o n-o~ o ° c L 7 0-6 oa w ° -E E o ° y m o_ 0. wa M °a 0 y0 a0 c LO o m c E m L "t O W ^ E `0 x o. E as 5. m? `oaE N nNa C. 0 a 0 ' E O N y^ r y L m 0- 0 0 m O E as ¢ O L L M O- O Q E (D a ° E Co c o co E (-o E N d° 3 m a" o o 0 m Y" m Q o vi o L m $ o °1 p o r o t a o 0 a, m N a o E o$ E E E E --t, cO °'D 'n 'a ° E L d 0 c C (a N O C m 1 9 > c tq a1 O O al O Q O O MOO Ma._ O aJ 0 0 V U co a -0 -`O » W C N m co 'c a IL L c o N L ? U d c O N L S N 0 C LO .o O h a 0 Q ~ O N C_ m to OJ LL 0a N a M d N M'-"O C a N M N c d 19 C Z L m a1 L C y L Co a) E (a L a) Z L a N C L m M a C M m~ L dt a c m L E 0 a O W L m t° W M O E Q I '3 c . c E a m a O N N c~ U Z 0 co S o> > Z os LL O Z, an d o> H C7 M cn d m 3 0 a 3 os a o d R O L m j L co ca 0~C > m `m m O _m co m z° m m m m Z 3 ro m J .T o ¢ o m o m °N' S o d ' p m `m a J m m 'Q J 3 `m a } 75 .2 6 `m J° m 0 N m o = m o W O y O N c -O o o- W 0 0 W ° > 0 p W E 0 0- 0 0 0- 'Q f6 chi Z E a x 3 Q 3 a di m m "Ca Q N Q N In Q N Y Q N k Q N W Q N Q N- J Q=p OQN I Q N O" p-G Z s Mk ARVADA PUBLIC WORKS Fax:720-898-7603 Mar 24 2003 15:16 P.01 I000,~ Date March 24, 2003 CITY OF ARVADA 8101 RALSTON ROAD ARVADA, CO 80002 FAX COVER SHEET FAX # (720) 898-7603 Receiver Dave Brossman - City of Wheat Ridge Receiver Fax # 303.236.2857 Number of Pages It Item Description No. 3. Message 1 thought 1'd send along to you my comments regarding the easements in Wheat Ridge which effect the Arvada parcel of Skyline Estates. Let me know if you want to discuss any of this. Sender William Puck- Mapping Department - Engineering Phone # 720.898.7656 If you have any trouble receiving this transmission, please telephone (720) 898.7656 .NlailiagAddress~ CIl' 0FABVADA P. O. BOX 8101 ARVADA, CO 80001 8101 ARVADA, CO ARVADA PUBLIC WORKS Fax:720-898-7603 Mar 24 2003 15:16 P.02 Skyline Estates Filing No. 2 - City of Arvada Engineering Administration comments by William Puck. 1) There are a few comments regarding the easements supplied that will occur within the City of Wheat Ridge immediately east of the property. They are: 2) Please title the easements and drawings accompanying the legal descriptions with what their intent is. For example, one might be a Temporary ,Slope Easement for Construction and the other a,Permanent Drainage Easement. 3) For the Exhibit A, please add a tie distance to the Northwest Corner of the Southwest Quarter for referencing purposes both in the legal description and the on the supplemental drawing. 4) With regards to Exhibit B, please add a tie distance to the Northwest Corner of the Southwest Quarter for referencing purposes both in the legal description and the on the supplemental drawing. 5) Both easements are within the accepted standards of closure for the City of Arvada that is 1:10,000. ARVADA PUBLIC WORKS Fax:720-898-7603 Mar 24 2003 15:17 P.03 Elas3ffi EXHIBIT A February 24, 2003 A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16; THENCE NORTH 00°13'11" WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, A DISTANCE OF 341.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WEST LINE, NORTH 00013111" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 920.30 FEET TO A POINTc' -4--o-+ ge,iV 1~ A- `k~ 1Ju.a Corwer V~ 'e'tJ4 5c~ it THENCE SOUTH 08009'32" EAST A DISTANCE OF 120.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 01024'37" EAST A DISTANCE OF 129.02 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 04017'02" EAST A DISTANCE OF 146.22 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 04038149" EAST A DISTANCE OF 78.83 FEET TO A . POINT; THENCE NORTH 89046'49" EAST A DISTANCE OF 69.23 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 00013'11" EAST A DISTANCE OF 78.64 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 89°46149" WEST A DISTANCE OF 67.61 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 02000130" EAST A DISTANCE OF 124.72 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 01032125" WEST A DISTANCE OF 65.87 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 06027147" WEST A DISTANCE OF 134.84 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 00004143" WEST A DISTANCE OF 44.96 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 89046'49" WEST A DISTANCE OF 23.26 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 30,467 SQUARE FEET (0.700 ACRES) MORE OR LESS. pAG.E 1 OF 3 ARVADA PUBLIC WORKS Fax:720-898-7603 Mar 24 2003 15:17 P.04 BASIS OF BEARING: HEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AS BEARING NORTH 00°13`11" WEST. THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 16 IS MON'UMENTED BY A 3" BRASS CAP STAMPED "CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LS 13212" AND THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 16 IS MONUMENTED BY A 2" ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED: "PLS 19003". PREPARED BY: GEORGE G. SMITH, JR, PLS PLS 19003 ON BEHALF OF: KIR'KHAM MICHAEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS 5600 SOUTH QUEBEC STREET, SUITE 200D GREENWOOD VILLAGE, COLORADO 80111 (303) 694-2300 H:\010414\LAP-o10414\Sux ey\legale\cffsite Coast North.doc PAGE 2 OF 3 ARVADA PUBLIC WORKS Fax:720-898-7603 Mar 24 2003 15:17 P.05 TO T " ORhMNG .'0.' .'.AITTEN PERV~9HION OF KIR~N~N .1M 91 CONSULTNQ ENGINEERS. EXHIBIT 4th Av_e i, ' I _ - - _ - - - r WEST LINE, SW Y4. NE Y..'17/ SEC 16, T3S, R69W N00113'11-W_ _ - - - (BASIS OF BEARING) --'i r-- -PROPOSED~--- ! - NO :SKYLINE ESTATES- - ^ - " _ - - F1L1Nc No. 2 0. ---1.-fAR~UADAI - I -_z o I I I , L_ I I i I I LINE TABLE LINE BEARING LENGTH L1 $08'09'32"E 120.00 L2 S01 '24'37"E 129.02 1-3 S0417'02"E 146.22 L4 S04'38'49"E 78.83 L5 N89'46'49"E 69.23 L6 S00'13'11" 78.64 L7 S89'46'49"W 67.61 1-8 S02'00'30"E 124.72 L9 S0132'25"W 65.87 L10 S0627'47"W 134.84 1-11 S00'04'43"W 44.96 L12 S89'46'49"W 23.26 NOTE: THIS EXHIBIT DOES NOT REPRESENT A MONUMENTED LAND SURVEY. IT IS ONLY INTENDED TO DEPICT THE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION. POINT OF d gidge g°a - NW CORNER. SW Y41 NE Y4, SEC. 16, T35, R69W FOUND 2" ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED: "PLS 19003" - - Y r - - i - AREA - 30,467 sq. ft.t - 0.700 ac.: r . t~ r w r '1 I I I R-ROF9sE-D- SKYLINE ESTATES 4jl=;~ -Ado- 3i (WH T RIDGE] r I I i -Y til I I I 1 ; I ~ :z L12 j I of ~ r~ri ~L~- I OrTi XfrWT " CORNER, NE 1/4, . 15, T3S, R69W NO 3" BRASS CAP MPED: CITY OF WHEAT .E LS 13212 200 0 200 400 ORIGINAL SCALE: 1"=200' SCALE: 1"=200' MELODY HOMES MM KUMHAM MICHAEL W MN, wq eNeeem, CONSULTING 1INGINEER5 f or ] NYA NO. +i-mai 1~ tp_ ARVADA PUBLIC WORKS Fax:720-898-7603 Mar 24 2003 15:17 P.06 EXHIBIT B February 24, 2003 A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16; THENCE NORTH 00013'11" WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, A DISTANCE OF 71.25 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF RIDGE ROAD AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WEST LINE, NORTH 00°13'11" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 270.65 FEET TO A POINT', yooV,_A4.4'1W) CovwE~o~S~e~Y.~~~tYA .l(o THENCE NORTH 89046149" EAST A DISTANCE OF 34.20 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 05012159" EAST A DISTANCE OF 93.97 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 01°23'39" EAST A DISTANCE OF 114.26 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 77°39'40" EAST A DISTANCE OF 49.47 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 89021145" EAST A DISTANCE OF 165.49 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID NORTHERLY LINE; THENCE SOUTH 74035'30" WEST, ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 270.97 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 17,541 SQUARE FEET (0.403 ACRES) MORE OR LESS. PAGE 1 of 3 ARVADA PUBLIC WORKS Fax:720-898-7603 Mar 24 2003 15:18 P.07 BASIS OF BEARING: BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AS BEARING NORTH 00013111" WEST. THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 16 IS MONUMENTED BY A 3" BRASS CAP STAMPED "CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LS 13212" AND THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 16 IS MONUMENTED BY A 2" ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED: "PLS 19003". PREPARED BY: GEORGE G. SMITH, JR, PLS PLS 19003 ON BEHALF OF: KIRYJL M MICHAEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS 5600 SOUTH QUEBEC STREET, SUITE 200D GREENWOOD VILLAGE, COLORADO 80111 (303) 694-2300 H:\0}0414\=D-010414\Survey\legals\Offsite Const South.doc PAGE 2 OF 3 ARUADA PUBLIC WORDS Fax:720-898-7603. Mar 24 2003 15:18 P.08 c sDRl m 'rp - ,Z CR^w NC wI oUr wR1r w eEM"l==10N pr KIRKWAM vJCUwEI CCUSULTNC ENCINEERS. EXHIBIT B .Ave - NW CORNER, SW A, - - - NE Y,, SEC. 15, T3S, R69W FOUND 2" ALUMINUM CAP - - - - ' STAMPED: "PLS 19003" - - SKYLINE ESTA7ES - - - o FILING IO. Z (ARUADA) - = ` ' ° - - - - - - m o o prf- _ rn v - - - - - 'c = + SKYLINE ESTATES - - - - - N - 3 JL -Ncr.- _ - - --J J ~(WHE4t7 RJDGE) J I r - ' o 1 AREA . - - - - ° o L15 17,541 sq. ft-t r y rn ; 0.403 ac.* j POINT OFI 0'-' L16L u1 - LINE TABLE LINE BEARING LENGTH L13 N89-4649"E 34.20 L14 S05-12'59"E 93.87 L15 S01-23'39"E 114.26 L16 N77-39'40"E 49.47 L17 S89'21'45"E 168.49 L18 574'38'30"W vrrrnrwrrwrr i $ 270.97 NOTE: THIS EXHIBIT DOES NOT REPRESENT A MONUMENTED LAND SURVEY. IT IS ONLY INTENDED TO DEPICT THE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION. sneer No DAT N00'13'11"W L15 71.25' POINT OF O,& COMMENCEMENT e SW CORNER, NE 1/4, Rld SEC. 16,'T3S, R69W FOUND 3" BRASS CAP STAMPED: CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LS 13212 200 0 200 40D ORIGINAL SCALE: 1"=200' SCALE: 1"=200' °x-/03 MELODY HOMES PGSION, C RAwN, 3 ^ ; CN CDI Y r A 0. lv a pr a W "-mw, ICMICH" EXHIBIT B w^~` W MMICHAEL cONSVLTING HNGiNEBRS CITY OF1 j~VriVA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - ENGINEERING DIVISION FACSIMILE: 720-898-7603 A TDD: 720-898-7869 PHONE: 720-898-7640 July 14, 2003 Ms. Mary Austin - Planner City of Wheat Ridge 7500 West 29'h Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Dear Mary, Attached you will find a copy of my proposed address map for "Skyline Estates Filing No. 2". The addresses shown on that sheet have been coordinated with the United States Postal Department and our emergency services department within the City of Arvada boundaries. When talking with the United States Postal Department, it was highly suggested that the addresses assigned for Nelson Court end in either a 3 or 4, and Nelson Street end in 1 or 0. By using that criteria there will be less chance of duplicate or extremely similar numerical duplication that sometimes occurs within areas of postal delivery routes. Please be advised that the planner in charge of this project within the City of Arvada (Gary Hammond) has informed me that the subdivision is nearing final acceptance, and the construction phase will begin within the next couple of months. If there is anything else I can assist you with, do not hesitate to give me a call on my direct line of 720-898-7656. Sincerely, _ William "Bill" Puck - Engineering Administration City of Arvada P.O. BOX 8101 A 8101 RALSTON ROAD A ARVADA, COLORADO A 80001-8101 i f .e~~ 4 T1i~►~T a~"~1~NA11f T,A~ TRACT I ~ 4 T~~cT u: ~ LOT 1 u~ ONMEJZ: HOA• 1 7': {q, i,. ' ~ r J,1 ~J.1 ~ cam. ~1 ~ B C3~43 cam. ~ S45`t 3'10" S00'13'11 "E , ~ 12.78x.., ~ d ~ i .row r i ~ c. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~iiA`~h, an"~ ~.~A~..;~ ae A i m ! ` ~ ~ fu1r~.1.1i! ti-~1nl1~uFP 1.~e9WY60W ~ i~Y'~°' 31~ ■ 50 0 5b 100 S44`46~5Q~W . 19.79' 2.83' ORIGINAL SCALE: 1"=50' _j ~TAI,..~ i d ~~'E' ~ ~ NE CORNER, SE 1 /4. NW 1 4, 30' WATER UNE EASEIuiENT _~I SECTION 16, T3S, R69W (REC. NO. F1204902) o FOUND 2" AI..Ui~iNU~i CAP (TO BE VACATED BY ST +'ED: "PI.S 19003" ~pARATE DOCU~AENT) 01 ~ EAST UNE. SE NW SECTIt~I 16. ~t~ i~ ~ 8' .E. W s f 1~ h h ~ ~ ~ Q C~ O h ~y 11 ~ 1 CI 9 J M Op ~.s~o ~ 'r° ~ ~.sst t° .sat .t. r' ~ O ± ass .c. ata cam. ~ a~a r o.ia oa. o i 5394 " a ~z 53~~ 5374 53f~ ~ -jJ e i ..r ~ ,7.. ~ .T . -T....-.. TRACT D usE: o~ sP~ 2.415 sf. OMAVER: HOAR ~ 0.06 ac. i ~ y . I ~~g co a ~ ~ p i a o ' ctE. 5385 5375 5365 .L T~. 3 ~ ~ ~ 5395 o m a ~ ~ 12 ~ 13 14 ~ 15 °a° Q ~ ~ ~ ~'~642 sf. ~ 7643 af. ~ 7.643 sf. ~ 7.643 si. ~ 7, 4 0.16 oc. Q.18 oc. w Q18 Q18 oc. ~Z ~ p2 Z b V ~ O ~ - - - - ~ - - - _ ~ w ~ ~o O - ~ 86:00'' r ~ fi~:0(T' ~ib~:OQ" T'b~Ut~' ~ - ~ v ~ W ~ .IaIOQ''t.3~'11"Nit a- F~ 4 ~ + ~ r ~i ~ ~ ^ , g ~ Y~ ~ m rya ~ .a ~ * 's A ~ f Q ~D`-" ~ S 3 ~ o I h 7 8a2 st. 'n 7,43 st. 'n 7,s 3 rf. 7,st~.3 sf. ~ 7 ~ S ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ Q16 oc. ~ W Q11{ +se~ ~ Q18 oc. ~ 0.18 oc. r' I ~ r e a o o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5398 ~ 5~~ 5378 53~ t w t~ ( ' Z ~ _ _ ~ o ~ I ~ ~ ' ► 1 ~ Sri 17 0 ir.r> } w ~ ~ N _ r ~ m ~'9 5379 ~9 s.. r- 1"~'~ ~ Q ip o o u 0 co ~ cr g a► 1 p 00 11 aD 12 00 1 ~ 7.842 sf. ~ 7.6 3 sf. ~ 7843 sf. ~ 7,843 ~f. ~ n ~ 0.18 dc. 0.18 oc. 0.18 ac. 0.18 ac. ~ f N W ~i ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ G.E. b~2344'38` ~ 577 sf8 ~ R~206.00' _ C8 G.E. ~ Hor► _ .L _ 0.43 cam. Lp~~ ~ ~9'30"E ~ ' - $ 5'82 Ct~84.33~ : f N d ,3fo" ~ "i - - o a ^ G3 ° ~ `s'` 3~ w ~`~J• f.. Z~ C1 N$5~,,~ `8 S ~ ~`rr~~.r~ ~$$~'"o C1~B Sl a N~ ~ ~ 5393 ~ ~~~8n chi ~ ~ N ~ $ s~ ~ 3 5383 ~ p ~ F cp g = i• ~ ~N r ~ ~ ~ 5377 " 0 0 ~ p ~ ~ Off ~ icy t/1 ~ r ~ 5 1 't r i ~i ~ N .i p ~ ey ,~.s32 ~f. ,~.sas 5373 j ..~c ~ a~ a~ a~ w u. a r ~ ~ _ _ _ t ~s. 20" DRAINA-GE (CITY i-.~A I E A T R I D GE) 4lir {p i •'i 4" ■ 9i 7 ®o i tirw# • ®wv r® 1 %oL L 11 11JU 11 1 11 64, 30' CURVE DULTA RADIUS ARC CH CHORD CURVE DELTA RADI LE~Jt~~~1 i i LENGTH a *,on is nl6aide. olicaLl y.-. UNE `gyp Co cl , • w ~ • • w • a ' va ~ ~ `Y ~ s~ 4s ~a w C c2 xr a41 ~r OS-- coo ?.oJ" S45`I 310 E G C3 a w • ~ v / 1~ cl MLLU Nowsmalm Co 52 Sl 2. 83• SUO'11 OE C4 riri*w 22 2&QQ: s •4 • r AIM X12 zip -1, MR ml~ i' i 11031 Shen( 113.16* TRACT H C5 7 4s r • ~N51 26 ww 21.61s v13 ~1 Z•V a~ 1 0s -low C14 Z3*S low& cs 25&9~ §013" C St LTING HN" r.: in S Westm ON- - 'I li GltlE,; N wA --jils,,mmus" all. C7 127*9 uiw „ A ste 8' C30 1 1 15. 00 < SC14L.E: 1 =50 C8 ~ L6 A tK: (34 W4-"M FAX- (M) 6"-i6a ii 101111 25*,QT §,22 "W 51 L 7 Y-5 14'-11 WALL SO LEDGE O 48 A.F.F . " 26 W SH 42'I16O` - L Ov TUB- ' i - - Nod - 1 2 1 2'-21/Y 2'-1 1/Y 2--1 1/2" " 4 A FIIRR ST S R Is O Q 1 m CLOSET lR/1S j ]RTS _ FAMILY ROOM $ OPT. OVAL TUB IN MASTER BATH .m T 1]'-6' % 10'-6' " " = " . i C1R CAE NiPu ET SCALE 119 Y D . ; e 2xB BAND = OPT. BAY WINDOW 5041 SL S ENT ADDS 15.5 SO. ET. SCALE 1/4- = r-0" 1/z OPT. LIVING ROOM - DEN BAY SCALE: 7/4'= r-B" 3 FOR 12 12 1/2" _ W45.10 W363D e® RECESS 2x6 BAND ENT. q _ sI1RRWN0 * 6s KITCHENsBn2 3 ,/z' rl MASTER BATH n scA1E: , a = 1 =o zx4 s" FLAT W/ 7/16" 0E8 DECK STD. SCALE: 1T6' = t-o `l to OPT. FIREPLACE ROD.. DIMEN61DNs SCPLE 174- 11 -0 F - xz ] NAAN f.F. *ysBy6 y BATH 4' G.F. MASTER BATH ~IOPT. RIB BCAIE 1 6 t'-p' o- MASTER BATH SCALE: i 4 = 1-0 1/x" OPT. 9` .313 O ~ •1 n 1 PAPO rv MASTER _ - - - - a -ID 6_0 4 s OPT BAT IR/IB 14'-rF 15-] _ . r-9 ,/Y CLG 424, !T nc 11 CLA)SET ^il g ~ - iR 2 11 1/2 2 1 SOBS BP BATH FAMILY - MNn RNEt WAUL ROOM A _ O w A.F.F., 17'-6' % 10'-6 BEDROOM 2 j VOLUME ' 11' 9 • r CARPET j g - % 9 - r-9 1/2- 0.G. ° CARPET - m m A ~s6, r o u BE BET rL ND SIIRFAft t _ B ' FAMILY RWM 1 0 RpOR MG BREAK A0 S R ACE 1 REP W/ Fl A E m L• ~ ® 3- 3 41/4 ` B IN ING ROOM No ~SURFALE RQ9:VING ' ' ` y i/ . ' :j - • - - 11 -8 1 z y t _t 5-O 1/2! „ 16'-4 1/z - ARCHED OPENING r-9 v Lr ' - DINING OPT. 2566 ! i a6e BP R „ ABNCE DOOR p n s SI. OOM . . N = _ R PLANT MEU` O 12-6-X"--6' I PI " STUDY - OPTS I 1]'-9 1F2' 0.EF, VOLUME CARPET „ 10-0 BEDROOM 3 s• - 11. x W-11' -s • i r l \ II • MG. r /2 = n B M IwEE WALL ~ j CARPET i R S-2' 1 I n n 1 r OPT. 2866 SC 1 / L-------J 1 1 1 /SERMCE DOOR /0.05EF 1I1 K - 1 I1 . OPT. 3-M 5/e" TYPE X GYP. BD. - ON WALLS AND CUM N BEEN h o UM MN II GARAGE GE . SURFACER COMMON ON TO RO- _ t 1 L C AND ALL ARE~ JRAL STtIJU C1URAl MEMBERS j O 1 it r REF -J 11 GARAGE II CONCRE,E 3!I' a EE. 7'j" j /2 I L Mun ry LIVING RM DEN 41 ~ ihl 11 OH R 1 - tVOLUMEA 'CARPET 1 r m n 16' x BR GARAGE DOOR t i ' MASONRY L \ - j O SUMMIT SERES ONLY CBNL. BMW POxP P 3 II O _ I 6090 A •I 32~ B2. G KITCHEN LLVG RM - BE. BE, D ( LVG RM - DEN r~ STUDY ARCH SCALE: 1 4= 1-D '~`j SCALE 1/4- - 1-V Y j co 2 i 'O0n 00- W X01 Z 210- U y ] o a Z 0 0-0 mom O x C O [ W = LL p E m° -c o Lm o ~ 29 z u) C „ O ? M ~m 0. M_ 7 C 5E y m r0. I C\ V1 = h m ~ 1I•°+ e' . r off cARAg DDax I, •___T i 16' x Y ON GARAGE DOOR o~. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MASONRY flO a ~ D SUBMIT SERIES ONLY MLY f - ~ - p ~y 9x16 OLUMNS ~ 6000 A i BRKX/ STONE VENEER WT. BAT UNIT 1665 aQI DO[ 9fII W.MDRm A-2 It- LEFT SIDE ELEVATION - A SUMMIT 5(:41 E: 1/4' - 1'-D' ROOF PLAN - ELEVATION A TRADIRONS - SCALE: I/g- = 1'-0- 78 4*wry relef/q c~ o•) UP m AT11C (UBL 3A~C ~ AS WHYS OR 1 5(0 ISS7). ALL WN15 TO HAIF OF WNUS ARE W IINFS£CT SUEEN HG IN M EQUAL ALL EXPOSED METAL TO BE PLANTED TO MAT CCLM M ADJACENT SURFACE RUN N1 PLUJAMNG/ EXHAUST VENTS TO REPR OF HOUSE UO NOT SPLICE TRIM M FASCIA BOARD AT M ASOW ANT MENINGS. NO mm MAFmE SHALL BE CUFF SHMTER THAN S-0'. INSTALL GUTTERS AT ALL HMIZONTAL FASCIAS PER CWE A wso?"I FRONT ELEVATION - A SUMMIT - - SGLLE: 1/. - I---O-- 11 u 1 TI 1 111 "1 1111 111111 I fil 11 . :II I 4.1 I .I I'' ly~A 7 Ji .I ' ry' _ Y i~ I II I~' I I I' ITII fl 1R 5. I 1 I I(I 1 I® 1 I I T REAR ELEVATION - A SUMMIT SCALE: t/{" a T_0' FASCIA -1x6 FA A .1x4 MIN _13' L SIDING :.-lll II 1[ 1 L1 '[y I L L~ is I ~A LL "4YL I rill 7JLIu RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION - A SUMW7 SCALE I/4' - 1'-0. .,rte W/ t' 1PIM m ~Nm W w jpro i OIOa ci EQU3DoC6 w O o mod LL E >,o Tt1 O DUm O_ s v/(? Lmm W t O C° z 0Cm S 0 Z ow. a~m~30 ~1.4 TNIM S" LAP SIDING L./1 W TW v1 e` r V v 1 VJ UNIT 1665 R~T~M A4A NO 3 PRONOE 1/150 OF ATTIE AREA AS VENTS OR 1%300 IF HALF OF VENTS ARE IN IIPPFA ATTC (UBC 3205(C). 1997). ALL VENTS TO HAVE INSECT SEREENING . EOUAL AL EMOSED METAL TO BE PANTED TO MATCH COLOR OR ADJACENT SURFACE. RUN Al PLUMBING/ EXHAUST VENTS TO REM OF HOUSE DO NOT SPUCF MM OR FMCIA BOARD AT OR ABOVE ANY OPENINGS. NO WM BOARDS SHA L BE CUT SNORTER THAN 3'-0'. INSTAL GUTTERS AT ALL HORIZ(NTAL FASCIAS PER CODE. ROOF PLAN - ELEVATION C REAR ELEVATION - C SIMMR-- - SCAE T/o - r-D' RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION - C SUMMIT SG . '/Y' " t'-W FASOA TRpI NM 9DNN( R 1 TRIM I J I i O O a) W E W >Om 0 Go ti z o P ? _ O m ~o/1 h y W L6v LL O C O m Z ~o 2V0 oo M I:~w 0 ~ 6 N~ Q z ~C $ W 0 _Z CO Es Owe m ' mL m T-~a ~ V 1 W - r -a V~ UNIT 1665 9m,IIM ♦ S 5 I ' ° J FRONT ELEVATION =C LEFT SIDE ELEVATION - C r".ror C-Alf.) SUMMIT - SCALE-/. SUMMIT SCALE 1/4' - 1' 0' cwr a 1/2- WNL w O I'-O SMf + O O 1/. OFT. 13AY NOOK P P V1( 4-2,4 e . OR. oSR O . O MA51'M W i ®Pl VPULi PiKF - , ~ ~/OO (OR OPTRVAUUL, 2666 o? > L, T'-s /Z NI /J OP. OOR W" l OP-r, MA51-F-p BATH INCLUPF5 Orr. 2' CANrILEVEf: vr-i . ~H DIVING )9=6' f - -l I I I- OVlwwt B1~0' I wxc vn,w z'»z' caxc. sua 1 I 1 I /q+E a ~v`L enr ~ N ~ ~ ' MA57EP NOOK p 1. XNV RIq O 1,12 pAMLY io 1 HUR ' p ~y ' ' , I ' ' ,O.W. O 3 1/1 5 SKL1 FS W/ fM PEP BLOB tl _ I b (Lnl R4 • 1/3' (PU Z... i.0-9- O K Ni ° I3 M 2668 A m 2668 1n' m _ o O . o , M IT BW -i- KItCNt 0 1 ' 11 1/3 ryy pgOVE-'-1 I I_ 1a2 2R 6 2S ZySR BI- SS n _ L O.. vWLT w/ 5 SE LVES g PE(. 91ELVCS -J ' '0 -O T Z 2 T 5 1 12 a 1 1 TON, O ]'9+/3 Z2W nRIC xc(ss m m i ~ 1 l I ] S 2 I/ % Vn CR 68I? 2 m, - ?F PINING Y. NLL NLCquxxs 1 E i ; - I ; JI { ° - ° ~ - * - t M W _ I ffi m - LIVING - RCOPIXL RUSx O COPNEP 1 (pgNL Ta~E / UPI. VLXWK PIB / B2] CIHME, / L---- 5~ COLIRAUON~SUwRACS NUgx"N°N6.XC.s PO~C k sw.HURG SRNCT. xN.ENr (Y,. TO VNCEPLM O( ROOF, U2« ol.21T 6oao LB / GAP.AGE CONC. 61AB NE / GPR~. J ,6'T O.N. ARPGE O'AR `o ~ aXlp B~RI« PEruRXS/ a' ELEVmwxs Jai S.dp~~v ae✓ MAIN I,FVF:L FI,OOp PLAN SGYE: 1/4'-Y-0' INFORMAROR OONMCNTS LONTNPNNEO ME HE EXCULS HEREIN, ORE THE TE E PROPERTY OF MELOGY HOMES INC, My USE. DUlUCIIRW. OR TRANSFER O RIE MEHiS OR X ESSE SI oOCJMEX `E T TNT OF THE THE EXPRESSED W MELODY ODY HOMES IS 5 CONSE $TMCRV PROHIBREO- n MELODY HOMES INC. w U c f) 1h I z ~ Q a_ W JOB H 98002 DATE : 12-06-00 DRAWN BY: MTH REVISIONS: SH_E_I: Al SEE F-3 FOR R4EPVLE oE1MLs ChB & D 266R T/,6- OS O W a OrTI ONAI, FIpF- pI-ACF- 5TUV Y orrNING e ~ r rw t 5 BRICK TWAIN CONC. PORCH F I?ONT SUMMIT F,.L. FVATION 'A' ~4r.a.- /6 70 seiNOx SCALE: NTS \ w/ 12x VENT w/ 2x2 TRIM 9" HDBD SIDING 6 FASCIA F I OPT . iiiSERVICE RAPP L==J OPT 42"X42" CONC STOOP LFFf SUMMIM 'A' P/A. 16 7o S/,cyG:~e.7t [~LF,VATION SCALE: NTS BRICK OR STONE/ kwti 9GQT ,wee 9" HDBD. SIDING F F,60 X 70 .H. DOOR BRICK OR STONE P-,16HT SUMMI-' 'A' F, I,FVATION SCALE: NTS Gourse ~ cc/~t er /o~' /6,70 ~1~11;rle oY SHINGLE SIDIN SHINGLED EYE[ 6" LAP SIDING BRICK NO SF SUMMIT ELEVATION 'C' F pONf SUMMIT FIFVAfION SCALE: NCH /(a~0 NTS DBL 12x18 VENT w/ 2x2 TRIM HDBD. SIDING L-- l-F.,FT SUMMIT 'C' FLF.-VATION r==:::;I -JJ OPT 42"X42" CONC STOOP BRICK OR STONE L1T SCALE: NTS DBL 12x18 VENT w/ 2x2 TRIM 9" HDBD. SIDING 6" HDBD. SIDING 160 X 701O.H. DOOR BRICK OR STONE MASONRY r/y X a' 6e 6Z Course (9 corner /oh pIGNT SUMMIT" 'C' F,,LF.,VA-rl0N Ile l% /670 SCALE: NITS - FIREPLACE ELEVATION A2 SCALE: _ 114-=,•_0.• Ell i wN ROWDER' MSTR BA W/4 BDRM OPT. - BATH xo 9141,OglOp s x C ]I' Y M' S yBY L an. X vm # T-~ STD MSTR BATH Oi In YA r S-~ Tp' ~ 'an g ~ W]d Aw ate yo-. 1 t a tr a ty_N. 2- Kitchen KitChen CABINET ELEVATIONS ELEVATIONS A2 SCALE: 1 \ m s xY a5o' i+ NB O etR -s' na/aT Ye x a, -~3 tRIS J s vuxw otrmdu OPT. OVAL TAB /'511\1 MASTER BATH L2~) SCALE: OPT. BAY Q LIVING 60.5 ~/Wl. t 7f 1 T91Fp IKS W/ $pfPl BAY (9 NOOK SCALE: t/4' -OP,. W/ STANDMD )Ad ROW PLAN- -STANOM W/ OPFONAL 2nd ROW PLAN A4i SCALE P~~ ] VR I _ I° I -I L O.S I/, • , rel JH n,nlms vao arts SIa. 4 1fm1 Ewphlm['smEm mix DDm J sN vwmE ID(mJ Z. 'ro - cac Ig101 (-z :)FRONT ELEVATION "A" SUMMIT A41 5CAE£: t/ti=Y-o' t ' T I fff~ii C. 16 S6F11 MXIS (M) ' Tr~u Em 41 5/4 .,'TRY e're' Arcf HXi (1TP.} 91E®9%G _ .'y O 12 L N s~ - B B116WAI VFHR (111' ) R m TO _ n Q. . _ in J>I B S S ~ y 41 N 1~ • F ® N,O - i5l iby - i N favd m - " " } 1 4 RIGHT ELEVATION SUMMIT A A4, SCALE: 1/4'=1' o' \ , r & 0 ••rse~ d - 6 corner /afr a ISSUE DATE ELEVATION NOTES: 12-28-00, PRONBE ATRE KNTS EWAL - TO 1/150 OF ATTIC AREA OR E ED 6: IR 6: 1] ( 6_1} I I/3 Ci VENTS ARE N UPPER ATTC ALL TO HAVE a REVISIONS CORROSK-RESISTANT METAL 12 HE91 W/ WERINGS. PPMT ALL E%P D MR. SURFACES _ - I I TO MATCH AD.NCFNT SURFALL DINO' t DO NpT SP"a TiIM OR FASCIA e _ ROAROS ABOK OPENINGS - O.S wI~ SW,- NO TWM BOARDS SNALL BE CUT SHOR7ER TN. Y-0' - - 6 It 6 D m~ PRONDE IS/FELT AND GPLV. o PRO.IECT NUMBER : : METAL TF5 YpMeIED TO s 0.S ~P A W ~ W P NIO` SNOS O tfi 0.C. AT ALL RRIIX VENEER e NM1700 ¢ Y Nff T~ SJ 3/ L I RUx ALL PLULbxG / E%MAVST - - - - NTS TO RE.Ve OF HOUSE I 11F R FRAME IIMII s ROOF PLAN A4i- $CA(E: I/g•=Y-O~. SHEET: PRONIEFE RUBBERS AT AU' HORIZONTAL FILSPAS N' NOT F ABOIE ANOTER RPV t "A" SUMMIT 1 OF: - /~:)REAR ELEVATION "A" SUMMIT A4i SCALE: SNOOK BAY @ ELEVATION "A" SUMM _IVING ROOM BAY @ ELEVATIO REAR ELEVATION "C" SUMMIT A4j 5CALE: 1/4-1' U D=nmu rlmFlux-~ . CLEFT ELEVATION "C" SUMMIT A4j SCALE t/P=1'-D" FRONT ELEVATION "C" SUMMIT q4j SCALEe -0" 6.W ml_ 1[X15 [FF.~ f lyl- TFCLL F %lA 13 5~ WIX 4EYCFA i/1 ~ 1 WY 6 WlBll AIL BTIX'VLYTp 1W d Fwr1~ os -.4 c~s~oA/fi /G{t/d ~B"i6 AYl gl1(M.) 6. IC WRT ~Ifxi6 (iW.) N "C" SUMMI ,S/y'x r" ie# Gour.re ce/r1EI t /e /S ELEVATION NOTES: PRO`AOE AT11C WITS ENPL TO I/150 V AIIIC ANEA OR P ED ,/,GO OF A~C EA 1/3 Of VEN 5 ARE M UFFER ATTC. ALL KHTS 10 HAW CORNOSW-RESISTANT METAL MESN W/ I/~' CPENINP$ PAINT ALL EY OSED MT SURFACES TO MATC ADJAPENT y RFALE. DO NOT SPLICE TRM OR FAS A BOARDS ABOVE OPENINGS L t - _ l _6rz 1 - I I I I] R e I I D I a 12-V I CA OL4 r 0 _ S Wwt~WTi nj I I I 1[$ IA RIIYE kNL L „ _ J 0.S DS 6 ROOF PLAN A41 kALE: 1/W-l -0" NO TWM BOARDS STALL BE WT SNORTER THAN X-C PRONDE 151 FELT AND GALV. METAL PES MOUNTED TO SNOS O TV 0 E. AT ALL. BRICK VENEER ' RON ALL PLUMBING / EANAU51 VENTS 70 REAR OF HOUSE PRO`AOE GUTTERS AT ALL HORIZONTAL FASOAS Y NOT ABOVE ANOTHER ROOF (~~)LIVING ROOM BAY (9 ELEVATION "C" SUMMIT A4j 5CALE: 1/C-Y-O' . GENERAL NOTES: 1. REF. SIRUCNR.LL ENGINEER'S ORAMNGS FOS ALL SlR11CR1ML NOTES. MEMBER SEES AND MTNLS 2 PRONOE WATER RESISTANT GW. W. TO A NE1WT OF )P ABC` DRAN INLET. 3. SAFETY/1EMPFAED LIALNG SNAl BE PRONOEO PER CURRENT U.B.C. AT ALL D00B5. SOEUTM NB/ 9N1'XEA ENCLOSURES AtO MNUOWS WHERE REOb- 4_ ALL STARS SHALL HAVE w 1MY SHE AND 9 MM. _ RUN INMDUAL RISERS AND TREADS SHALL NOT. VARY MIX, IRAN-3/B'. HANMAL HOGNIT SNAL NOT BE LESS THAN N OR TREATER THAN 38' ABOIE STAIR N09x4 S AL E% OR STAIRS AIAL HAVE A { MIN. TO B' uAY BBB ND 9' MIN. 1REA0S. INpNWA MSERS AD TREADS SHALL NOT VARY BY ABBE THAN 3/B'. HANDRAIL HBWT SHALL NOT BE LEBS TH. SR' M GREATEN THAN EB' ABWE NOSING. STAIRS GREATER THAN u IN MDT, SNAIL HAVE INCH HANDRAIS 5. PRONOE 5/8' tt E'Y GW. W. UNDER STARS IF ME SPACE IS TO BE F BRED. 011 AL AREAS BETMEEN GARAGE AND LMNG SPACES, AND Al SUPPORTNG STRUCNRAL MEMBERS IN GARAGE. 7. MAAWM HEIGHT FROM FINISHED BOTTOM TO TEA OF EGRESS WELL IN BASEMENT STALL NOT BE GREATER THAN H' OR A LADDER IS TO BE FRONDED. B. THRESHOLD HEISR MEASURED AT Al DBMS TO THE INTEPoM Fl.OOR SHALL NOT EXCEED t' M B' MIEN MEASURED TO AN EXIERDR LANDING. 9. PRONDE AN INPERNWS MEMBRANE BETx 04 CONCRETE AND X FRAME AT AL PORCHES/ PATIOS SOLIAR FOOTAGE INFORMATION: MNH LEl9- 72 BS. MO IEVEL 3N ST. UPPER IEVEL: 386 S.F. LOWER U : 355 SF. TOTAL 1804 SF. WT. 4TH 190 sS. TOTAL 1994 SF. I.G8.0- APMO PRE-FAB. SM VENT GAS F.P ETPRE55 GIP. BD. O E.P. 3' (~T)LVG. RM FIREPLACE PLAN A2 SCALE: I/C=1 -0' E%iENO TO ROOF OEIX ABOK OPR 8-10 PATIO OFT. S° BS n.' OPT_ BAY n'-0" 11-61/Y z•-2' l0•-10" z'-s I/ ui e l aI +I 321 ]0" I C \ I ncmcccss 5 _ ~ \ - \ BEDRM. 3 -r 1 N C BEDRM. 4 I CARPET I I 1 -C - I~ _ M PO 1 I / I e'-5 Y-]'¢ 2 6° s' 5 ry I ~ I I ® of loge A - }opo yl O pEx i0 B OW 1 ~ ] _ p E I 2 o6e i ~ b MAIN 1 BATH NNA 6 1O a a. C 2 6 ] _ Ae s 1 BEDRM 2 RAT 1 RUE ~^!1 vtElr . CARPET fRMME 1/2 G1P.BD.O I 11'-9 1/Y AF.F i 9 nPNU Tn I` ' @ELO]Y I I CIN~A60YE of ~.1 =I A 2 4'-31 it-61/2" 2•_2' 2]'-0 UPPER LEVEL W COPT. _4TH_ BEDR_ 6OM 4 A] I n'-o 11'-61/Y 2_2 IX-31/2 S-II 31'-1' ufl aI 22•v o" pmc I " acss ~ I . BEDRM. 3 - ^ n fiMPET I iq I e'-6 1/2 2'-0 ' 3'-0 • OP x To BEL9N 1 I ® I66° A O 6 V 206° 6 MAIN A BATH r f._y NNtt 2-6- - -s' lo. RUE BEDRM. 2 RA U I %Axi SHELE ] I/Y cn.WO.o - CgppET m M E 1 id It'-9 I/2' AE. I I oPEn To BEL9W - - ~ ExrtxO QNC. AB04E e~ wl 01 al R <'-31/2" II-fi I/Y 2'-3 1}'-31/Y 2T-0' (j:)UPPER LEVEL A2.1 SCALE: 1/. =,-0' 4 A] FInGIEs 26 DA G MSN%G ~x i6 26 GGJ OULTWR G ~ Is' - iTx I6_ SCI ~ A ND OO W/ 5" "FENAW x i6 6 SCfFT WHITS - OCS LINE SOFFI T VENTS TIK D.L OUTTER 26 AERT- - AT WT. 3 1R AND DC M T W/ 5' F%IEN9g1 $ .GLES CAR GARAC£ 6f i 6 ` muss ORMi. ASPHPLT 116'-5 H6'-5' _ - - SHINCLFS E ` 2Oq ° _ _ 2 TRUSS BRIH G. II Y-1 1/2-1 1 B9N'G. 1113-1 t 26 GA 41. GUTTER AND GG SIER BEDROOM , _ fi XAROBU. c W/ EXTENACNN AT E AT OPT 5 % ELE 9 1/2 xAROBD - . . - - -26 6A 61 GUTTER - la f lMU f°f° SE M ASTER BATH 1 WIND I - - f la TRIM OVMSpLVJ - w W/ EXTENSION I_PPRELp PPR LEWL 6 I. TRUSS BRN'G. 1 ION' ] T/Z"y YIOS' T 112 r _ TRUSS BRX G. n TOY-9 I/2 1 JOST BRH'G JOIST SHMG I IOY~B 1/2F 8 p MASTER BFDRM"A _J ION V la f lR1Y L.I. ix 4 1RIU a°y°R o4° 8 BPoIX _ tS HPAOBO. BRICK 9 1/2" HAROBO SIDING (i(i,) 901NG (l W.) J MPSIER BEDROOM - FA C[ ERIC( aR 4°4°SL <e4°9 RAI M1t OTT. 5 %ECE MASTER BATH WNEER VENEER ` { ' NEED . lx 1 TRIM { x f i% MAIN LEVEL iJ M IN LEn W1 - ;00'-0 lDD'-D' i RIGHT "A" ELEV.-SUMMIT 12". 'B" ATTIC r2 -~LEET "A" ELEV.-SUMMIT A6 SCALE: 2 12'. fe" WNT J SHINGLE STRI (FAQYT ELCVAPON CNLt~ 6~ lx 2 METE ix 6 FAStlA 2 (FRONT EIEV MY) SXINGIES 12 - " 6 ~6 GUTTER p6 W- AN NO DONNSPOU] W/ 5' E%TENSION 26 GA 41. GUTTER 1+ 4 TRIM DA RUS$ BflN'C AND pO.SRBUT ' FBI ' . f' V 16'-5 W/ 5 EXlEN9W 8 x Ifi BRN G~ tlfi -5 TRUE! ' SUFFIi VENTS _ F.O.B. 6 E SIDING 4°1 5 BRN G. 1 ° S -1 1 2 4 .1. LW KRED SHUTTER (PIP) A UING - 1 9 1/2" XAROBD. BAT. REF. $NT Al J.UPPER LEKL 6 l6' ] 1 2 V t ADING (llP.) UPPER LEYll~ l - / 108 -7 1/2- ' JOIST BRN'G. to 4 INI JLYST BPN C. ' lOY -9 1/2 III II 1 II 10Y-R T/2 i ° 9 I WT III a°4 III s 11 III 2 6 9 1/2_ HARONO. - . QITiE 26 C A .1, AND DP.SPWT xD I1f _-,11 / SIDING (T1P.) W/ 5' EXTENSION OPT. 5"O scO- - 14ax IEYEL l t a 4 TPoM IJ `~1 W' o M AIN LEVEL h -0 1DO'-o - wt MERL NARDD. XA IRIu Q REAR "A" ELEV. -SUMMIT sOALE. AB 114"°Y-O" 2. BL W/ 2- O EA 2- I-3/4 9 1/L" LN '/4-, 6 iPIM [,y G. F PORCH POSTsx 0 (I BRN'C.) `5/4% E . LEV PORCH-SUMMIT HALT RIGLES I I' FU N'E - BRICxMWO - _ - , a FRONT "A" ELEV--SUMMIT - ASPHALT SHINGLES y T Y ' 9P~~ l i 1B VEN W/ la f TRIM 7/I6' RIM & OSB BACKING y V 1 B"X Ifi" SCfFIi VFHTS C EONS °e TRUSS MR.. - T 113-11 2 I~6 f~l WI--1 li 4 TRIM 26 GA W. w FLASHING ~fl TRUSS BRNQ y O 10Y-9 1/Y - ' E - O ~ ~ OPT. 3 LIR -1-E ~CARAGE SHOVM KEI DASxED _-1E-- 1 S ` •v /'1 . y r•1 I" ~1 1 1 -IE __1jE FACE RPoIX S I 1 1 x 1 I-- Q1 1 E YfBTEEfl X ®9 1 t 1~ 6 x 3 T/' 3/6 S1L B.TO Axc1E {uV) Ir~ NT "h " W ® ay ] EL / 1/2 1 U _ B PNLEL _=J r= LAOS a a \111' S a ISSUE DATE m_T"J_nT ELEVATION NOTES: PRONDE ATTIC VENTS EQUAL TO 1/150 OF ATTIC AREA OR ;/300 CF ATTIC AREA PRONDEO q/2 Ci KNTS ARE W UPPER TRC ALL VENTS TO HAYS CORROSIVE-RESISTANT METAL MESH W/ 1/f" OPENINGS. PAINT ALL EXPOSED MT-. SURFACES TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE. 00 NOT $PUCE TRIM OR FASPA BOARDS AaTA OPENUNGS. NO TRIM BOARDS SHALL BE CUT SHIXTER THAN 3'-0" W10WOE 151 FELT AND GALV. METAL TES MOUNTED TO SNOS O 16" O.C. AT ALL BRICK VENEER REVISIONS i 1 PROJECT NUMBER NMI804 E SHEET: A6 oF: INS GA G.1. FIA96MG B'x 16' 26 GA G1. WT1ER 6' x 16' tTa IB' $GFEIT YEN'S ANB OOWNSPWL w/ 5' FX1EN9011 SDFf1T 4FHT$ ` /,T¶C GA W. WTTEA RCIX LINE AT WT. ] WE SO EXTEN M N CAR GARAGE 6 6 ~ i SIO % TRUSS BARES. - ASPXALT 116"-5"~ lt6' 9MIAE5 I- 2 w ' TR1155 BNN'G 1RU55 ' 113-1 t 2 it -t 1 2 76 GA GI WILE AID WiNNSPWT - C ~MASIEA Bfg _ 1 W/ 6 EXTENSION - 1RIM 1k 4 go4oA m AT GPL 5 EN I MISTER BA1N 0 112 HANDED 9WNG (TYR.) YPJ J- I I I UPPFA IEVELn UPPER LEVEL I ~ - THU55 BRNG ~ tUB-J t/2~ 106'-] 1 %2' ~ ~tOY-9 1/Y VBRN'G. I JGSI BRN'G _ I IDY-91/2 tUY-91/2" MASTER BEDRMb ✓ HAROBD, t05'-a`V s-1/Y NARDED. I. 4 IM SIDING 901X) (TYR iYP.) MASTER BEDROOM FACE ORD. 4140a x41PoN AT CpT. 5 PIECE PIECE VEHE£F` R H1 (ttP.) MASlE0. GAIN 1, 4 TEN MArv LEVFL~ uAIN LEVEL 100'-0" RIGHT "C" -SUMMIT ELEV . A 6.1 SCALE: 1/4'-1'-0_ R"n te" AiiIC BVACHET (SEE DETAIL_ ASPXAL MIS SHEET) SWN(3E5 12 12 26 Gk al. GLITTER 6 AND DOWNSPOUT Ix 6 FASCIA EXTENSION Ix] SXINAE 1 26 GA GI. WT1ER fx 4 IRIM .M AND OOYMSPWI AIM ' ' E%TENSMH WU55 DiW G. iRUiS FINN a SC£i1T VENTS I 1x6 TRIM (TYP.) i BRN'G 4 4 Y 4°a 4 1 1 2 I (lYp.IERM Ixa TRIM (TYP.)- ° L 6' HARDBO. 5°4 A OPT. LYING RM. GRIND 9 1/2' NA9DBD. .&RD BAY REF. $Hl A4 SIDING ( UPPER LEVEL„ IIFl'ER LEVEL ~ 100'-J ~2 10Y-T 1/2 JgST BRN'G. .N%ST BRN'4 E lr 4 TRIM - OY-91/2' 1m'-9 II III III II I III 6°4 A III III O 11 1 pe6e 91/Y MANOR D. 1 If -111 I / 1/2 SDINC (TYP.) 26 GA. G.I. GUTTER- uTE AND DOWNSPOUT ' _ i. 50 SGD. E%IENGW W/ 5 kk.l 1, tx 4 iMM MAN LEVEL/. s ~MNN 1EVE~L IW' p" 1C0Y D• _ OPT. NREPL REAR "C" ELEV -SUMMIT 3 . A6.1 SCALE: 1/e=f_O' . 6'x 16' SOfiIT VENTS ASPHALT 4MIGIES - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ 26 GA C.1. -'TER 2-2x4 POST- ! OOMNSPWT r WRAPPED w/ s E%TENSW IXVSS BRN'G,i 10 6" NPROBB. z LEFT "C" ELEV.-SUMMIT A6.1 SGLE: 1/4"-1'-0' 12 x 18- VENT GRINS - lx 2 iRIEIE 4° 01 4°I°FND t I - AS% IT F- WING-ES ' 16 670 2-'1 x a POSt wRAGPED BERIX MOLD _ R C EDYNOD MCKPL QVC. WAI% k PCRCX 4 FRONT " C" ELEV.-SUMMIT A 6.1 SCALE: 1/C-T-O" 12 U210 HANGER 2x 8 LEDGER W/ 2-16d NAILS - ~6 RAPIER ILA 6 O EA RAFTER 2a 4 MST W/ 1/2' SOFFIT 2-2x 10's 9' 5/4 x 4 5/4 x 4 9/4'1 6 1M G FIR n C.V.G. IN la 2.G -IN ~j ~ 2. 2 PICXET PIXtW PGSI B4 (NON- RN 'C.) POST 0 5' "CI 5/4'.4 TRIN r5 -"\"C" ELEV. PORCH-SUMMIT Pb.l SCALE: lx 4 TRIM SHINGLES 12 a 18' VENT W/ la a 1MM 6 7/ E, OCR BACKING 8'v I6" SOFFIT VENTS fi SIDING TRU55 &4N'C. BRACRIEIS W/ p'T. 11 -1 12 7- CAR GARAGE a a TERM 26 GA. GI. ELAsDNC JRUSS BRN'a r---l { E- WT. 3 CAR L==_J11ft Tai GAR. sxovnu DAAIED K COLUMN ELEVATION NOTES: PROVIDE ATTIC VENTS EWAL 10 1/150 Of ATTIC AREA OR /3GO CE ATTIC AREA PROVIDED 1/2 GE VENTS ME IN UPPER ATTG ALL VENTS TO NAVE CGRROSK-RESISTANT METAL MESH W/ 1/4' CPENINCS PMNT ALL E%POCE0 MT- WRFACES TO MATCX ADJAGENT SURFACE. DO X01 SPLICE .1. OR FASCIA BOARDS ABOVE WENINGS. NO TRIM BOARDS SNLL BE WT A SHORTEN Yll. 3'-0_ PROVIDE 15[ FELT .0 CALI METAL TIES MOUNTED TO STUDS O 16" D.C. AT ALL BRKK VENEER 4 .NEE SPACE STANDARD, LAV. OPT. OPT. OVAL TUB 11 .aSIM BATH sME 1/a' - 77 ~ a~ ~ O N ® T O W CO U N O ref O O_ m 0Gf ® T L - Z Z ~ O O ~ D i V / Q =oo (/Z awo ~e v 3a~ U m J O A -2 9]OOt DNE: 8-0499 WAKN VDE OECKL9: AEO i 1x6 FASCIA 1x3 SHINGLE STRIP 6" LAP HD. BD. SIDING 107-3 1 2" GARAGE BRG. OPTIONAL 3- CAR GARAGE ~EJ 0 TRON STANDARD PLAN 12" x 18" VENT W/ 4" TRIM TYP. ON FRONT ELEVS. E] rul 00 ` BRICKMOLD ELEVATION A SCALE: NTS 116'-5" BRG. ASPHALT HINGLE ROOF TYP. 107'-9 1/2" BRG. 1x4 TRIM GRIDS ROWLOCK COURSE 100'-0" F.F. BRICK OR STONE S~~/%rs Jl 1x4Tf HARDBOARD ~P SIDING 9" HARDBOARD LAP SIDING BRICK OR STONE 100'-0" ~ F. F. n r II\1Ivi y ✓G fin. LEFT ELEVATION STANDARD PLAN SCALE: NTS F~a. /~70 6" HARDBOAF LAP SIDING BRICK C STONE .RIGHT ELE STANDARD PLAN VATION SCALE: NTS 11 HARDBOARD AP SIDING JO'-0" F. ,.4 TRIM /x'70 Gvr~er to 116'-5" BRG. -9 1/2" 5 OVER 1 DIVIDED LITES 5/4 x 4 TRIM 100'-0" F.F. BRICK OR STONE Fla, Ir,70 CAR GA GARAGE V1tUlN 1' LLh V A'1'lUN U STANDARD PLAN SrAtiC-:1,M 6" HARDBOA LAP SIDING BRICK 0 STONE L,,-- 7a rcrw" RI HT ELE STANDARD PLAN C crlrne.~ /o{s VATI ON SCALE: N75 1 I I I \I IV[ /.e.. IM i- 1x4Tf ]A T 1 1 \1IVI LEFT ELEVATION C STANDARD PLAN SCALE: WrS HARDBOARD SIDING " HARDBOARD AP SIDING RICK OR STONE 100'-0" F. F. PIiL. I x'70 HARDBOARD P SIDING !E OF DROP CEILING STANDARD PLAN ONLY 12' 10)) @ MA STER 07'-9 1 2" MASTER W/ 'PER LEVEL ' " - 0 00 . F. x4 TRIM REAR ELEVATION A ~ Coo&. STANDARD PLAN SCALE: NTS Lt - O~PT. FIREPLACE-ENTCTR.a '-SIN FPA1. R!.1. `1 - r OF f P & gRCH FAMILY ROOM OPT. FIREPLACE/ENT. CNTR. IN fANILY ROOM cCgLf: 1/9 I'-0' ♦T-9 T-9 T. CAN -O_ ?OLaB- s ?o WALL/LAN. NOOK NOOK aPOWDER' _ ScaLE. V4' = r-o- o- suLE: 1/4- --I -D- T- o TO' puM. Y y y 3 KITHENII 1':. 1 1. AM o-KITC AS PB HEV _ SCALE: I/a" = I -0 -F- w 11 1 ! 60x0 ! L____I .11 L o STRUCMNAI PLANT I ° I B.M T o ~p ' SELF (OMIT WITH ' NO O K II II {-y \'J sECpNp FLpoR.) (~L I (fLUSI W/ OPT. LJ 9 C ' !p K ITCHEN ' II BAY CEILING.) N NYL NNYL ' 1 C 1 ^ r C ~ II O TANDEM 2.6 WALLS O STD. PLAN. 2.4 WALLS n ? _ !I - I OPiL UPPER LEVEL fi 1 II G " GE LINE OF FAMILY "OCR ` ~i ABOVE A I. ' 2,6 WALL u ROOM _ t6V -qEi.- fr-2- IS-4 E E5 w 11 CARPET i 3'_61/Y n L 0~7DOOR 1-Y u II 3 6 WALL -T~ H T DINING IT I 1 BAJ / D / .a 1 CARPET 1 3/8- TYPE Y GW. B0. ON 'ALL WALLS CLGS AND SURFACES m [ 1 n 11 . LPANG AREAS. DO NON TO 1 PEAOSN II AN AU ANp ALL $iNUCTU CTVAL MEMBERS ua p qAM LRC i N NNYL U ac. py~ I ~ % LIVING GARAGE A ROOM , CONCRETE 11 ENTRY f !0-9 I II IT VINYL PRPEi C 11 N 0 II ~i~fF~ .L66 WNYL vINY1 I Ii 11 _ I ~ BRICK ®fR WALL ®41 ONi ONLT DRYER _ _ fiOPO sm- Q Tex PORCH SEi 3' rv n :o OPT. PY (Bps I se FT a ' ` A CONC a0ap LD 'P - O' !60]0.OH - GARAGE DOOR O ~ RETURN OR ,3E RAIL COLUMNS W/B! ry ~T OPT- TA CM / W/ pf ELEV. I LlE V4T(Ni 1 ~~i GARAGE NLT L - IU -1 ® TANDEM GARAGE -Z ! O A ! O AGEN 1 n.fa GARAGE GARAGE I n," I JAAA/31~ Quu TO KITICHrvELN_. 6 ,/2 D N ~ `mV 77-1 ~i n io CID ~ o m i f O W U ® Z~ C~D 0(Z) O C\2 O I fL Do m b-i uO ® WE, z cf) zZ OC) J 0L- v 0 o h~ ~ j50 ~Pi z Sao O 60 m4 UP, .OJ GA(E. 3-2299 IMJWTI YDE f1fIXED: AEO A-2 L 1 i MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN MAIN LAWL ROOK PLAN 1042 SF IOiu: 3033 SE s AIC. Y-C' . W/ N 6" LAP HD ASPHALT SHINGLE R( SOILDER COUR BRICK W/ LIN- 7"x4"x3/8" _AG BOLTS 116-5" BRG. TRIP 108'-7 1/4" F.F. 107'-9 1/2" OIL RG. 100'-0" F.F. i ?033 FRONT ELEVATION A STANDARD PLAN SCALE: NTS RAISED E 12x12 VENT 1x4 TRIM 9" HARDB LAP SIDIN LEFT ELEVATION A STANDARD PLAN 7ya,t-. r,7-0.3 3 SCALE: NTS 9" HAR LAP SIC Or f, e x r ~~rr >/n Cr /01j RIGHT ELEVATION A STANDARD PLAN 203 3 s,~~Ke. j~- SCALE: NTS RAISED HEEL 9" HARDBOARD LAP SIDING 1x4 TRIM REAR ELEVATION A 1x4 TRIM STANDARD PLAN SCALE: NTS 6" HARDBD. LAP SIDING ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF (TYP.) 6:12 PITCH 5/4" x 6" TRIM BRACKET (SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET) SHINGLE SIDING 116'-5" BRG. 1 x 2 FRIEZE - 1x6 FASCIA 1x3 SHINGLE STRIP 5/4x4 5 1 12 = 0 0 0 6:12 PITCH 12 5 1/2 00 El ICKMOLD FRONT ELEVATION C STANDARD PLAN SCALE: NTS 108'-7 1 /4" F.F. Y 107'-9 1/2" BRG. 5/4 x 6 TRIM ( P.) 5/4 x 4 TRIM 6 OVER 1 DIVIDED LITES 100'-0" F.F. j~lGk. ?-033 I Lx I L VLIN I RAISED 1- 1x4 TRIM 9" HARDE LAP SIDIN LEFT ELEVATION C 4 .N►.4fo,/y yp (a4 - Zd33 STANDARD PLAN SCALE: NTS OPT'L LVC & BED 2 9" HAR LAP SIC ENLARC BIRD B RIGHT ELEVATION C STANDARD PLAN ~~cc.-.- Zr 33 SCALE: N TS r' cilre r EL 9" HAF LAP SII 1x4 TRIM REAR ELEVATION C STANDARD PLAN SCALE: NTS p/~ Zo33 Ski/,Ia 2z x'-6 LIVING 1/r OPT. BAY LIVING AZ SCALE =1._t, SOLD DLO]( ,D MER :1 M PWrs Iz'-o ~39 OPT. F.P./ SENT. CENTER AZ SCALE: 1/s'=r-0" 1/]' REM RR"D TOP- OPT. OVAL TUB 3 AT MASTER BATH A2 SCALE: 1/3"=r-0" GARAGE 9 CMC. SUB IM7'O OR GPR. MGR 8 '0,ro 0R... I," 16-_=_0'-FIB -L. L MM-fi 0-0" OPT. 3-CAR z GARAGE PLAN A2 SCALE: 1/`_1 -0- II_ 'll ZERO CLE.CE iY-9 ~Y-p' rs.-3. J' V r-5 112- r-9 12' - PT. PATIO s-n r/Y A] 9A WL fY. / mi. Jbd'6 5068 PAM SD ySpp "06T( N ER lMP - - 1 1 MBR IrN NOOK WL I.V. 0 C /CPT OPT. V"T - - ly( (F ( NT. Is z,n' .-r ' V wws-xA, 0112 W90E Wt r\ IwE (i wAty 1 r~ L.O.N. O M-1/Y 0. AR 1 1 \ 0'-10 In Da-T 15_3. . 'r DAR iW 6' i - ~ FAMILY s 9 - ~ I r utT/cPT 5'-r z-6" t-f-T' dO I „ uca QO KIT NNtL VR T -taw wut 13 ' aAV,o / Ut 10P Of w41 Ai 39 ~ n - cet Rd0 1 o mTS-1 ' ' " 1 ' I -0 S-u I/Y 4 r-10 In 1I If s - L___ ' ry + J ¢ $ $ FIRE LL [F u, 39 r Y I 7 ' T 4 - p / 5-p CDING O . t I I. W AEI.PNI r p e ~ 1 I0 Ta PUNI 1 I - S 1 1 m M O r. DR 010',IILNI RCD 43~ V i 41 8 / 3 'M-112'. oYp'. Tro. I IVI v. o ph O . TTT9]] a 1 I DINING It j ' I LVAUL /CPL RA$_~. ~ - kr ISm R6 /fPC - - 1 sx ¢ 6 - ® W NTOVIl _ p C ~ cawds TO a IT-101n. -S In V-5 In' • 8 1114AA p YV1 AT e'CuR.c ID£ - MTDtt W / w VII M3 m w% _ WE m3 m w/uRT s I ~I DER, DEW I 1 BR 3 6 J p LIVING - LAUN DEC IAA' I- DLT/MT DEN OPT. BR.3 vvi DID C Ts' ac /CPT ET BR 2 Y ' / AM N T9 CtG/ s J T ACCESS qq 5 3 M m ' R.ap SD I a PORCH s F== C-s S a 11-21/4- OrvCYB YB smnnU w/ \ Co. ' _ MIG SUf, B 3%+J . L' Y 5/ M OR . CD MM/STWF 0LREER o ML wlll$ffAC D EARS CDUR0 .V DOMIER TO U.DflMm O SfFAC¢ CWIWOR m Pi TO NA RRw/WT, 3 OF OF xmarA w/W r. 3 uxxG AvfAS - Fxlum ip cAB waALx IIXCFN$EIE Boor DFaI U. mr. w GMAa C.C. ws3X ' Y wEc Y-o GARAGE CORC. AAS WIATO DR. GAB OR ° . fi-0 6'-0 3-9 1'-9 Y-r )'-t , - Ifi-p" • •-6 1'_e' IT-0" 5'-fi 10'-6' 'w-0- 1Y-0" FLOOR PLAN A2 SCALE: VC=r-1 JI cf) co N p Fr CQ Cn ~i ® ~ cC xa W A2 OR OPT. 3/4 BATH 4 W OPT. BR 3 A2 SCALE: 1/4-=,'-0" MAIN FLOOR PLAN M. PAY RAY m 60109DI-I.. r 016"Ifi ~qp 9R % - F- T_ _ w1E oo xxi aloER - . ~ ,6 v s Xz s-Ir ,r-alf' r-' ' s-r ' t t t Wi. xx FAMILY 7 i o NL ¢4 X7 € MUK. Y D " n. r-sac wi xx 10 T - }Ia x z KI O ¢c IW r-vy ' T:r ' r n'-syz' a'-a• z . . , r-R15• 1._,0. • WI. T-iw8IX1 1 9M X6 . _ wC(Il~a10 TiW w n xl ~ 4~ i•y. 'JS6 aD Cf ~ vNYi IA CC w[-- t Npx ao ahY r'i BR. 2 ~ , a i Y~n¢ DINING m h ; ¢ ~ nut rc ~ i^ 1_lV ~ i CYI. 6FIL WW pp ~i1W n -0- b WY Tag alma row 1. . ~ Wr. IAY. t Y.WIY ,Mcw S ~ P AT W 119. g WL - ° GARAGE LIVING r 1 R/5 ~ 1 S q ~ ,Y-r ' T'- S-Y 5-SJ~• TD'-iXF 0 0 T-TOaw 2-... / Wi, w. . f R I u W DEN / i BR 3 f RDRCH H . • om wR w r 9TC BAY . Y 9 aC - ~(~/n B 9 Wlp, u} ~WXC:UNE . YY -1 A C - MAIN FLOOR NOTES A AaxNr aegis w i/16 nsa aaw - _ - - "lAUffi nYf nC YM N9M1XM " - ATO ,R'wWNEm RIaE - - -,mrx wails Imne anmNa: - - uuurArneao iumeDNm malt w . irlEwoR .Yi: >/la-nse: seanwc - BAY PLANS OPT . BTlvwr.l. ~"mW l{I.aR Wul anslwY+oW wlaxn slxnPnc srax w+za w ' -T 1/Y Y-V K-9• 1_V IX,fflKR YNl aeATxW w SIIYIS u xDND w nwx.-IWu rRUw6 wAwxes ' nz 4~ ealo sw MIfAOL 1/T G?9N 6¢V® az 1YHCU aem W A . 94IX 1LRR .I YASYMtI T616' M '002 wiwiN SHR11V1014x IN MT T . OA m N rn N m w ulaaw W u azemxc w sous u xarmwzwanuN wuwR.s QO` - ~ , m ~ n~ m ~~.w w '>mw U OD FAMILY w ic i a. m H ajr Tac as.. a 11W z m ° z N J 0 an w. ac w mD now .asrs w aM3YFa➢ 6-.m,s u xmEe w smanwN aUWXOS rn Q V vi O p w m a.a9mu Room naw m_.R,r+++.. ii O FAMILY r,a6am aeRaxD w LIO w w[MRD _ _ cg LL FJKR AS MDIEO w SIMICD.flN c } m ~ /r=i -D' IN,s..-~, [luwxex mn HaR aauu I/r L19.PM01 p m ~l >%'o • II' 61 - ' • . n D.a,n+*Flgq tlHCmirrvu - Y-D Y-P 5 -9 SEE 511NC1WNTpi10ATw HAYS W L 0 5wD an z x W 'lai lux. . r W N o O Z V/C N ~ 1 OWM o __YV nG_ y. ~WA µ1FR RW &W .Ywm1 aEw r E a i&10M $ Z M^vO W p tll 0 y ' .IY / fl M r a WA _i C ~.T OL ' 1 r..yp = C 9. SlfPE GI➢Aa {ILX1D D1W YI➢ o 2 Q) r/d M_ BR. Y~ Xiw 1Www2 tY-s LIVING 1LL ¢G a w 5-s' Y-p LIVING AREA SCHEDULE swu¢ aEi (IEVAIKKI A [ uux aaw III9FA Rfpf X A H A 1wM U_YNG AfA Xd) Twl s-r ENTRY ARCH ELEV. S IYr - i'-V (Y➢ "j (1016] Fa HASOC w V1 t#j Nl~ UNIT 2087 A2.1 %F41-1 ~ i MAIN FLOOR PLAN A 4-M2Wns F/W;~) xly iA4yB k,l ,3 u.w nom- - y' R_IG T ELEVATION o - Six 9WYE POf' -t -I tR B~71, EXTERIOR ELEVATION NOTES xe~a IwYI° sMa¢ a ,q mYw a 34 nc nx xs3nmE Yo BYrmu 10 36f _xmci wES xom onuw2 - BI.IYMU vrr FYI nYK!PeIYM YY3r3c~ ~ m F3IL x/,C n.. sunac it ~ a sous ws xmm a smucnnn s~ - ~S _9?x~wfpAy2(p .~I XlFlm[ ,/2. 4SP9Y BJVO. J:1 L 4£ SEMI y//1AI B21,nC I^ m Dpm v A-SON mm u e A N oxn i/ i Vn,' W m Npp z ry x LEFT ELEVATION 4/ Y 6e/y~ ~ m p m ",§t BE*srv ew.w. n. .w nom StXlC.nX Z mpv a~ U ask sleFkw 7 003z G06t /SP nom msrs m wsm® L-- m F33srs u xorzo a sminnx O m 0 W.°v3 w ¢m..cexs T pp ft1 ~ % O GO//1 C3~ /0 31C TM D56 9L Wtt 1 o x m ano nom.mis m S°afEPID iii S O O LL r-nBms ws xmm m z,wliw.Y o 'p U in o IXUF3°S 3WIPIDm mm,: ,n' - \ o m o m T /l L W 0.y[ SS~S 5 =C~ ~ -tfla tWVR FAB3Yf °PD]f FtlRmA1X11 RAXS 0 t%. tFlll 2 PD]f MU M311°AMN E W w ~ o -lU SWfif SIA° Six AS ffmFES BY IOCN. CRE I '/E YaQF Bmi l p(.ItE tllpllpl$ WY V.WY fP01 Z V/ m N M ~m m Y~Y m z Y Es@ CSLIPM4IE PFR KNN 91E LndngWpi ~6' LV 9YNE 1. GWME RW 19;3f/ X % a) (8) (x3 0 JYSIS 6FlM S/g lllYihE GR9°I ~I.W M YIIFIMI GWIfI ~-E C M -0 AS xEgA~mSBSE ~ 5. ~C ix ~ G m Y->a Q° xoFEaa Yxm~ X30 =f uYx M]E sauEx mus M3R4B W[Y ~Sw ,x QS 03 ]d ,x RINi smr ,s LIVING DINING FAMILY FTT BASEMENT BUILDING SECTION A-A M MA M 3 DDDD YLL4 FLmi m n n n i.OI. FRONT ELEVATION A sV kiB rz n.• Ml L 44 x _ YYX PU7 GARAGES LND HALL MBR YNX RW CRAWL SPACE BUILDING SECTION B-B w w E_-+ H UNIT 2087 m me se w-= ` A3A REAR ELEVATION 12 - 5~ 116 FMA GI2 ,2.. 9'IM 9p14 6:12 5 Sr 51(ME G° xiAx,o/An., start ,olRx uwI Mrz ^ Wel iLMN y=a RIG T ELEVATION S-,-0 6X,C 9 T Hllr W. , - - n ter-~ &DRR IaR i~ rt~l A_A ROOF PLAN a,z- ai2 BUILDING SECTION A-A 412 9WaE 7 IeArwf y vaA=PtY wuoo R2 RrM ~xX PMI~ _ uux xArz Ana YNY RVR PA T ,2 f EXTERIOR ELEVATION NOTES A Il A~YLLt 9EM2E a j ,,55~! ml a ry1f I1SE as a ,mw¢s a 2r nc rm 6a2Anox _ i 2 - 1212 5PM .VO ,/2' ai1WL m 1®E I M/aQ ,la ~MSrm~IwaamX~a. - Ywrlcn6EO xuaealm arc a - - = eR : _ - 6xrtwm w2 >nf asa 9E@EA' ' t2 - TT - asNB 4AtPa6nasmnwx 5(~ ~Q5 - ix6 FAWx _ 1 ' 1Y' lM~eSXFI1iM:¶y SfE YETYL s/xt1 MIFWCR 1/161P3Y NY0. - ~ - Y.V1 M1E N)FRO ~~n' SIDE NIFID a YHRW - - - 6 ~t r/y x ~ • LEFT ELEVATION bC/f cow,r~ Go/AEI ~O/S u ttnvt Te I,FlGt I Y-f MOTE M(6/ID]) sowc e e ,2 ~6 ,X6 WNWW ] ~ 1X611a1 NFM IYB 1RY JA-A9_6 FRONT ELEVATION C . -1-n n.A .2 Q5 n• a,. va as n '--uAw MR GARAGE LND HALL MBR n`I AWL SPACE CRAWL " Ln FOJIHG BUILDING SECTION B-B _ YX„ MR 6- UP aM(. ,u aYem mw RE R,K 5/M, 51a1E a ®6IX ,EN'FI( wo W T.U. P 68rzRa 6V19EA1H16 a sons As twrtn a snucnMU2 „wnc aArxs z. ' rr6arc ,/2• msMl mAw. ex TKYll as ,oEPM YuI aMSm _ J~rE S u i ii N mamrt t a l N rn ~ m ' a txm6a MAIL vEAnrc a snms ,ts xM,m w slmcran aArws.. _ _ _ 140 1 RP4Y SVm NlWatt/2' XY W O B o. Z Data v a 3/r TO am YEA J O m ? - W Wo FlYa ,p51S a aPMEp6 F.4ls is xorFDa smcnxu O IA ODt°•X W _ Q mlra lL nmm60.1_:__ ]/3' w 4Sfl 5EA1NR [q a LIO fl t a aOtfYtEO 2 jX o C2 W m 0 LL t.,nsrs A5 xurt0 a 5101CRHN. E 0 U ~ p 1] W.YMa Mwi tlna ®xc,/Y 5 CK WA'a ~ 0 O m O m L J . YxawtVl rc'e E~mr 0 / E . ~ A ~ ~ m 0m M t i,mu~ ~ NO IDfF 11 VF N M 2 L a . ~ O y o Z V, C N 1 aME O}p1YJ15 YM' VN(f 1P]I O F 91bMt 9mrtA 91NL k16V IMO 8 IxlaAlttl2 P6M Ac1YU s¢ IIILYIIa'S z c' E x? O . 4 M63 a rtrow[ lre~°R = ' O O r c J • I:,Ka 6aYW M DIANE SPAR As ff➢ARO fiY ISIS Y J C' t = m ~ a T~ V 1 W z cf) UNIT 2087 - AIC REAR ELEVATION OPT. BAY PLANS NOOK 7-9 a6 NOOK ,p,-o FAMILY n°rt: ,x[ x°Bx uro ruuv nod, BArs u¢ xB, Avuunc ,/r_r-o ,.r..w.-wx, Wrdw Vf%S DINING ROOM ARCH ELEV. WN 1/4- - 1--P [If1E Y ,j MAIN FLOOR NOTES- I tas~- r ~/-m -i. imru mrsmcru~ xsmeo I A lrcx•u MmrS,11L_:_ - AsP~wt s9gBS w _ ' at Bxr ,sl ml w _ ~ . I wr. am - >nft~ asa.B~ w c-Y 44" 6-5• P-T ' 6_,? = • 19545 0 ]C nC MIM N911AMN - um i/Y d,ruu ro wstt xiw m , : " sow vB. r - _ - r - mrui uus xoRB onmxg S uAwxtnRD xAwLdNW Snxc w- Fi I - [xiww wC x/15' nxa srAUUC - - r' F-iE-r sass ac w " w s-moz As xmm w s,9xvdu dx. n i`= wi k ,/Y cn'su aw,¢ - z I ex'w'°iucrimwv„nmrme z udom sxPCnc send lurm w ' ftnac i p w vui 4ulww w snros ieaxxs°oeAwxn d O FAMILY dlww, P¢Y BOdm. O - -s a T-x' nc - Bl. naro~ xea w,sm wul mxs9uBnwr ^ 9EIX 19Wd s''-a' Y-s' -,B =.T s W ac xWxwlu hw m Y_}' Y-,~' 'J~' ' w p1FSw wui sxpiww w irv°s V J m ~ N m r it AS IpnBw$IPUCIWN pUMWS Q06 1)n (,r ri d1W]'t l/Y 4~93JY E¢Wa. C W . f 06 n. rmcu uux now Wxsm,BW9 U m ` a: Y x' x/f 1fC ata sxuiwx5 L- z , z w - w mo now ,mis w ww¢xm co O 0 i-xisrs As xon° w sisucnw.t D o ~ o 7 `'7 ly IXl m ; Bn zem nlnrwa O Ei m ;p wO z S" T- w a cax nrm CwiTM„nW 3/4 /x- ,a asa s[AmdB U 2 O= r OO z T ro m :r - ,-w5is As xolm w s~9icnau i 0 > aaa+auw,/x' fth =f-- s cre. Wum. n /1 m O B. BA4,ddt nrca mrsdin,w. ID B- ` w 3 sBB pP11LTIPY B¢dwnw nWS ~ ~ Ur L 06 ~ t xa Bn xMB i x 1.9rx wmw,rAB IE,wl sVU H • N yO Baw •/R! (u ° ~xort B mw°5£msc 9Art. O Z U) C N 9-31 ' ' xsnTa rung BBBn -o . r ~ ~ nqynd5pna{y~~Wnra~u rtn na. _ - z r' E ~ v 0 DINING i i - Ea FO OA N o omen iBC w mAUxc xWlc ton 1' a uF a olt9un Wxa BBw d m o C. T-9' aG T_y.l i uOK - 9. 4[R W1 M M 1' 1n V.WEM S m L ~i .VPat j4 }W.m Ia IWidxSC» L m r~0- Wa c ,2~ Yl D]gSlf PAIp. (IPrd) 5 F GARAGE e = n n x~Y nw¢,[ craw ly , wmu i~Y ./,Y wmc e~ ir1 LIVING - U11 NG lA aG l6afi W w ¢ ,Wla W w 9 • B y.1a ~ A.2 l • • B B 4-Y O B B • e Ati. t "i 1 BPA vB PORCHi O CH a Na1L Rn pi a'to wlih asxerti, n AadizE PePS y,.,m 1qR ;0.nmvm5~ m b w flvtwl , wic I A-A PARTIAL PLAN C MAIN FLOOR PLAN A W W AREA SCHEDULE nx~APw B uux now , ounce now io*u mwc xnu mi xn+ Y AfI. NllR C SIM rVMFR M F. B]) -w- _ ft CCVn1FA. 1 ,Y 591 K M5 Ly B L i B[mCPi YNNw T Wm991Yl Na B[ F F 1 PER nu,ow. E r^ l J 1 r , ll1 b fi 3 ~ ^1 1r { 61 ~I~ UNIT 2255 \ fi - 9fn llllE 96, ~ - vwx,.w~Y A2.1 - VIar,Px6 -wclNr pY E Olt LIVING „_m 7-6'_ R M /Y sI } R/Y ° p a+o stn so - - « ~ I 9 Io-Y 8 n i IY-Iq• a x-P 5._~. i 2 BR. . r h Y-9.66 ' OPI. Mi. MBR. M. NC _ 'S o e: N o M ~ l . BR.3 _ . Y : YY-A a6¢c ,14 0 ~ i' f-I 1 S-I' m ~ S-10J4 'm ~ R ~ R [x I R LOFT/BR.4. r-r an - ss %f-y~5• 3 -df' lX6 YNl w/,o~ ' m wiu w/®A ~ s'-Y' o Euv o 3'-6' Y-6 XYN6 - y 6M O MIO fIX 60M O EIE1'. C 'M40 x% ' r~ a oI[x ro moY o -ar urt.6#..evon --n--- N Y Flx - _ 6 9~ EMR ,6 9~ I Bf4 ] n'-r r -s- F A AAA UPPER FLOOR PLAN UPPER FLOOR NOTES A ffiICM PCOE NASMILIYI[ 151 MT SIMi6 PI IS/ M Yne am ¢a a xwum MEI/a a' ac xm xsLUx>t xmx/ ro xmE -mxn ExBS xmm RnYYx~ BI.11fMN SAfb llYl R151M)CMIt YxpxACRfiID Iwm6oAm scxc a EAEIV.%t wuL %/%K ncn 9EAIIBIG a snos As xorzY a SIRVfiRxn mAxms xlmmx t/Y YNSR, mum. nmmc IYZ b'IVSM bow. a mw a sr%mw+x xxAwx¢ xmem I/Y crvsu mAm CI. imCN uAw flroi 1%WSIA11CImk J/1' 1 am 9 M6 M 2,10 Ts nl M D M tll EINSRIS➢ FJp515 AS XOR4 IN SRNCNPn m x a.lmcu InvrR nrca mxslRUCnox. l/1' 16C 9£AIHVf a a,o n" w m W xNB~ Fans As mlm a sm'cann g4 YNI nIXR [qxC 1/Y w m. - W. D. RMM~ ~q sf smmnxu 66umnnw a,+¢ ~f. 21YPCLL xxxor MEAD IEprt Mxl m Y-o I A fRGx lro U M1E ( xm owwax. 1 x1FACF,ICI EWS PE SAM R 1H5 may MAU mnr xm comam 6u2 xm awnxc moES oAmw su Nxfi11 K EftR4 WM4Y 9WL xT BE YQa 1HM M' Aff. A Am YA1( - U- U a) S(Ai11C / 3Y(R~]l~pa]R' M fx➢f 6lyf~kpAl.3 HLOAL 4 GT9N B}Vm f NW(f AS Xa1FD O N ~Nm W w j0~ E U MIDV U Z N 3 Z 0 7 000M ~ 2 0 = 6-W ~o DUm '3 ' m C 'n C-. Q z VJ C(7 N 0w ° W p~ N 5 O C J 0~ m C d P-i I t~ vl UNIT 2255 Ma„m% i ixd ROA RY YYm A22 S, I ~ ~Y5 W FAA,A a.w9 IMhA RAh PpIX T9(cIX LONfR RWP 1 PF. &Il 81Y Ow GHT ELEVATION Y M, n6 F. f w~gm(pnL~p1 SII Cfl/15/NI.1 IFt9t F4R u wRa°>E°R M. k" [af. LEFT ELEVATION be/t "gorrPL 161-4 C' GOfvvt/ /O fr I%] 9416[ s➢ .6 F=S F9M iW FM Fd "D RLV. par 6'w4 w EXTERIOR ELEVATION NOTES ,N6. FAAY. , w 5) 711C ~ MM M SF£ dIK5/W.i Wd Mh wmiw% F%IFIL]fMLL]t16~IlS8-91FAlIdG - - d mos ♦s xO1F0 d AI9ICNRAL uFRF RM dAiN¢ uul RAs xRRlrt +i R' 6RS.l mum, 62TM11[u end yy{p ' uFxrm smncm sae wrtm d Q)FPMI N.4L SIEITN6 d $IWS M ROF AS XOhD d SIP.CMUL x. I. Fplyp6 d Tax. 1/l / f WhPtlf CRAM °Wlm. i R6 P6 @li Q° LI RiY IYNN C 9RI nV. IF, fAN1A_ UFPLR RAR 0 PmYFAS- ,]61PO1 IY61F01 4ASRR RMR LOXN RAR AlD£R NJflSF 9Wl/STdE HRFfl+ uu~uu FRONT ELEVATION A _I _U mawr_. n.A Iz ~ , uRKP 0.AR n< Bl. nl MBR ,L61 A R I LRMR RAR FAMILY "6' n.n Loral Rod io WLSPACE ` ,.6 FW,NC W d RA LOFT BR 3 BR 2 nA - - - - - - - Ra _ IFPFR RMN m PP KITCHEN nna .a R R _ LIVING DINING GARAGE _ uAn Rad BASEMENT - i.0. RmR BUILDING SECTION A-A Y I~ YKIFA III14h LOVER wRP RAR ,Y 9Fn s 9 n VFRR RMR YMI RAR - m9 PAIING 4IM RGA i.P(. BUILDING SECTION B-B LUMP R LIlF. n a uiveaP wu xAnem a inns N In 'EON m As mim d sn°radu. n64x¢ )1 mum , ~ a+ 10 O . RmwR 6W9 ! y ~oou mus~T+k Ynw n W to . im Psh 9lAhlN: D O (p ti 0 m d MO AAS d 1 ASIS sa wt dANx¢ ? Z O io As mhoM d un a w o U ° v . Lm Psa 91FAmM6 O o `L V ~ f0 d LIO RSR .951sdIM515 AS MORO d SIMICMK W..,YN¢ Q T O Q N C vw nod mxc ,/r cR. mum o. eax4dr and mlelmxma' ~ y x p > K W o M sP zmmn+d F6wAmx Rua p O V U O ^Q) Llm W 2 PmM4 POP MO 9Jiif g111AT41 AS AdndD RY lOnl ttmE 1 ~ ~ = m ~ ~ 1 fRKf CP61mm5 WT VIAY fFd - d Q o W (n 9YA111 Rudd 9uu wsT,Vm N]RVIAh RR PCII419h [CmIIYM 2 C m r 0 wO.~GIPN#POP R PPUAE 5 mE Y n S O M c: Z JpmS e d C199W mNm M O..RAI£ 9KC a O VI d As Rdwp d m6n O m c O r ~ a m P 2 l~[jJ I ~ W C/D ~ m UNIT 2255 A3A REAR ELEVATION muur ruj►n °=1-P - X(iIT In fA91A Bfz- In fA _ r yeI T [ s/AUt Aar uHrz RAIE. UA91 LffFR RAZE - m~rcB~ LoXm ilfffN RAIE R sL~u.i .il tk6lffl➢ iRY M. IXf M(.LO/ JA1® 19Y 1R. % UMIX1/MI 3E LEIIB 5 pu o ~a ViiFR RCCR Yl1X MlE ~ i ' i _ W.'m RM➢IG ~ Kil Yta RIXF l ~ ' ~ I B B lIl(. ~JJ'. &U 'R , ROOF PLAN .21 aC LOFT BR 3 BR 2 LIVING DINING KITCHEN tr BASEMENT BUILDING SECTION A-A VWLR GUl[ n.P n cz UPPFR RaP YISi RAR nQ n.n Y RMR B.aF. nY eAVYar RLw h f 1891 RVF ~i~ WkFR RW1 Ylll RAIF Y.W M1F ~ . MIR4lR Ijl 4W3JY WA®. ~ = ~ azTwYx Hale vxRR _ >IH[nm Smo4nc sm[ waER a Raa mwa rut YeArxw a slBOs uxl ROa _ -L~ - - As luTmaslwrnRu T.Yf. LenR+c oBAYaws IBIFI R 1/3 B]AW. N WW BI mcu Lraa Hlsm y caBBm-Bay IN, M. Z wua LfFnm M ,,4 m, 1 LEFT ELEVATION , • VOK/IC m,Eraac In~ ~wY eaaa. ~ I L a E a I Ja61S M ME Wo I GI O c m w SI . a^ QT91fY INi[R R[d LaSTU1CIlIXt GARAGE 6 1} WT. M MBR FAMILY BUILDING SECTION B-B f B=I- nLa YA51LR RKB Lf YI1 RAIE rva nR LOIEP RCtl1 Laf. TA Fwo 3/4 TAG aS9 4¢A1WgC p LIO RCIX ARTS a I .C53 A51plm a S1AlIC111RH aA`p1GS IWLRMR n'GR. Po40 I 0. BA4YaL Fl" an Ca511XICMf I 3E SIINBBFU EpPOAMH RAYS ~ 2 FABNK0.Pm 6t LOJI CtlNNXMMY A 91GYAL BJL@F 9lXLLXYEGM1 M'D BAR ffR ACNN 91F [UA1KN5 f. fmoxo cA¢uz Boo( rY~s~ ~ipoR JIIBTB ~L~ CIp9.yFl B~ ~N~N G41MY 9•A4 LLi~lii MII f YAtiIFR ROR torAx RArz Ixz LReS fn xEAO uml coReB TRu SII aE(IA 5//AI I% aCCI( NYd rlOk 1\9. wccLSr saE rrml Y[ p n/IAI (a RYBLWo lOfJt RWP r.or. BBEUSI sLOrs~9aoc vFRmx n 4. 0 U) m "2Nm ~E W Oro OZ mcOV g O v X° 'X Ln OgLn mee~m 2 O COLL z DU m ° ° m L W S2 (D o Z (n C N 0 . Q N Z mEs(g) 6 Om C J m O G m ~a ~ ~lv vl UNIT 2255 sm fm[ uR-RL'YYnr ' sm F k}j(€ 4 t i I I t f RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION C 7 OPTIONAL FIREPLACE - ENT. CENTER. Vz- 12 - 7' OPT. LIVING RM. BAY ADDS 155 SO. FT. 1/4- = I'-0' PAwTED ~ ' - _ _ e z- T t/2 .,gyp o rTUm Pw eza ssx 4,4 P4 ~S'I'UDY SHELF DETAIL - - nKITCHEN _ - - nBATH IN LIEU 6 PUwOER ,/C UNDRY \ W/ OPT. eEOFwu ,/t=P-O- r `wraEw Y-9 1/2' .O. WN 1R„S 1 ' CPT. SM W/CAB iLO - w ® DINING ROOM .0. LAY. 1. Y~ 1/P=Y-O• Ap'_p- {ice - ir_o,i,• w e LAUNDRY A FRAYS _ UNDEfeRAYE 2.4 FLAT 2'4 ANIEl i0 Y 2,K PiErF RECESS PDR ~o• 2.4 PILASTER T- Km h RH: 55 AADI SHMAS B SIIR W -2' z.a'S S-s t/2' , t/ 7/2' 33~ 5 FAMILY ROOM ~msN DiYErsans nNICHE DETAIL w2r W2130 EILLEP --s ~t- _ - y_g t CPT. 9%70 TOTAL &F. PARTIAL FLOOR PLAN @ MAIN LEVEL O ~ m Mo- n w z 10 z- 3OR-- E r N ODV9 Ea 013 O'~ x. 2 00 r x Rg. >00 m 0. ru C=r0 r3 G m_ n v 1 W ~1 F w T V 1 E-i ~ v T L/ 1 ■ uNiT-Z~as Y~Ol e~M ~K9O9~ E~eus ~Y6101 A/~ /Y OPTIONAL FAMILY RM. BAY OPT. SAY - (ADDS ts.5 SOFT.) A r-9 , R' y ATN 19tOC a OPTON 1 4' U BF / T-9 1 T O.WN1 5 OPT. 9NK 9 Y-T uN. V562] 192] S. CPi. vmz] /~IeATN Y-91 " O.WNL o } pOWS ~ W/ Y 0 1~8 1/1• T9E oEa % \AN91ER ahlN iAfE VJ V4' - r-o" IW-7 TIT BEDROOM 2 h g R 3i 19-2 , , r-71/2 n b L _ C C -RA95 o i BEDROOM 4 1 i BEDROOM 3 c T-9' 0.G M gg ,0'-6' Y IY-6' L CN6'ET i 1 I ~ ?-D" tt0. ary b m ROOF BEIOW 2-9 1/Y ~ B~ 5 0 e'-t0 t/1 3'-T T-Y 11"-9" 14-4' PARTIAL FLOOR PLAN @ UPPER LEVEL OEOFOON • O nM 1/4". 1•-O• D _1 yr le-0 t/T 5-71 2 6'-101/2" 6-101 T-9' 9'-0" X-31 ISDGE CAN1pSKft e 48' Afi 3 1 -u 1/z" 9036 SLD. iEYP - 5 to $lD. NICIL VAULT e MA ERSUITE ER A 14- IL m h BEDROOM 2 T_g F____ 289 N _ ii m ymy V Sr lY-6' M IT T-9 ac ATDC n ACCf555'-101/Y'- ' K ~ D i 4tPCR~ n wT. uv n5 9'-0' s- 17 TRDE 524 r R DR o In 5088 BY-YA59 LOFT t , 10' 2" X T-9' 4G _ _3 1/2 ~ '-51 3 6'-Y J~ \ OPEN TO BEDROOM 3 BROW - 1Y-9" x 1I-6" T-9" ClG 2030 E 2020 f 5036 A . 50Q KD. 2'-9 1/2' e'-0- 3 5 2=0 I 6'-10 i/Y 9'-6' Y-g- ]'-2" 1-3 3siT ii-a 39-6 ~ --3 C V 6 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 1.015 5T. 1/4'. V-9' EINE OF Will mow i oPC04 c / W W >O Z_ 0m Z 0 20 W O. o h $C. a T i = Q Y aU gym ~ ~ 2 - ~ S 0~~ Q'z Nc^ z ME10 ~ 9 cm. ~1 1-NN Mai W T V ) ~d 1h, C/ D k~NiT 2346 9mu Sim - i S~_ FRONT ELEVATION 'A' SCME : I/9- - V-0 LEFT SIDE ELEVATI.ON'A' W/ OPT. WTS 9 : 1/9• - r w REAR ELEVATION'A' W/ OPT. BAT k GPRAGE BCCR WALE : 1/e' = Y_p 1 ~~vWC RW1 Wib O TW 6 X d' 4cli "t-rie C-vr,q&- Kok ASRNKT ' YCOO-ILKI. 9111: T oY-D t/Yw MNN tE,4L ¢4 -o T.¢ FWWATgf FRONT ELEVATION W (z) Ir = ,r cac ct 2x 2 7M %P.) C cr /of; 116•-5 ~ 1 6'-5 w '.G1D I£fl BRG SECp1D~BRG 1M T1K9 2CDND -9 rf. 3¢IDIEY41. iS. Jam- ',y~r, _''~ry-_-_p foY-91K. MNMYHII~~ MNX I£`hl Q49 9• LAP 9¢ND , SRlES AND REAR im' o v MAW If1f1 iF. ~~NwJe+e~ LEFF SIDE ELEVATION'A' Y9 SOME : 1/If - 1•-9• ~~A =.1,11Z Jt2W(c} ,Ml} ALLSINTS ro INK ,T W M MAL ML EiW3D MEFK TO RE F/l1TFD TD MAT¢ MM M A¢M¢MT A RfACE K1N9 TO RPM Or Nplff. RUN ML Flu1W DD WT ¢MQ MI TRIM OWFCa K W7 B , AT ¢t S- MY 4VEWNGS slsrA¢ wTTERS AT ML xWTZwTU rASans vrn wDE fi-S SECWD L[vEl BnG t )1 SECOfq 1EK1 r 1of-9 1h'1 DES MVD FF,N DAP ov_o•. 11111111111 U Z W T/1 7 Oom 2=C >1 = oz 03 - O 7D Z W o Q ED C/') W w Z w 0 0 O ^D •.1 UNrF 2346 A4 REAR ELEVATION'A' S : ,/a• - 1•-O• RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION'A' W/ CPL ar.Ya 9 : 1/a• - 1•-O- REAR ELEVATION 'A' M/ OP,. TR.. KG E : 1/9- - I•_D• GARAGE RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION'A' W/ ORT. TANDEM WALE S : ,/a• - 1'-V RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION'K Sf!!E : 1/a• - 1'-9- FRONT ELEVATION 'C' W : ,/6- - F-O 6• U qi N L T WILT ~1 T-9,/4" BOTTOM OF HEADER t/yAr'F 4pd F L GlrsrtC corner !1IN LEFT SIDE ELEVATION'C' W/ OT. BAYS S : V6 . 1•-0- REAR ELEVATION 'C' w/ OPT. BAT tr GARA6 . WALE : 1/&- -'/~FrA'~/RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION 'C' / EA W DFT. BAYS S : "w - 1•-D' gCOtID !£YFL LS. ,oY-B , h'w MNX tETfl 0.G 9• EAV 4pFIL - 4DE5 al0 PEAR 1Ltl•-O w REAR ELEVATION'C' R : ,/6• - 1•_D- sccwo IL5ELIF.F. ,OY-9 th w -Man ~EVEC ac /5/I % B TRIM ~6- LAP 9DINO I/4 X 4 MM FRONT ELEVATION 'C' SCALE : v.- - V-0. (2) 12 . ti CAM .r/y END WNn ,16'_5•w 9:NND IEYEI BPG T SECDND IEYEL FS. _ 4aM IEKL CEG MAIN toY-91h'w u 00'-D w LEFT SIDE ELEVATIOM'C' ~AX ND ES mPER Arnc6(IZ SZ2OS(CB9n. WALL YWHn HAA OMIJ 5~CN3EFN~W61n m EwAI ALL EFPOSFO METAL To BE I,AAMi To 4ATw Cd.IX1 M ADJACENT A AM PUN /LE FLINLLWo/ EMNAVST WN1 To PEM a HMM. Do HOT 9'IYS ,PW M FAMA BOARD AT M AIMW ANY aPCl1 M Ho TPM DOARIS SIAM w wT $NCRTEP T m Y-o . INS,ALL wT,FRS AT ALL NwIZJNTAL FAWAS FER w L ASRIALT S NISE5 BRAENET - BEE XTA t]/Al - 14 FAS A STRiV - fRCNT LILT la FRIEZE ~ u,6~Q ~BOIRB --F.M OILY_ ~ i5/4 % 6 TRIM- 5/4 Y 4 C k MM -5A % 4 TRW V/ m wo- > w om Z mcop 2 m 5oE^P- 0. 0m;14 x-ff . 0 ID 1 CpLL> o.9V2. co ~ Z ~ EEO th«.. L m r~ a V L W e~ w ~ V 1 ~ .t v7 UNiT 2346. ns REAR ELEVATION 'C' W/ CPT. ~ S : r - - - - - - - - - reBn ro DtlLW RM DINING ROOM ARCH ~Ip F3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - solo Sa Y -T ~ ; - . a d B a, „ FAMILY n> EIB B B 9MT DDd DEN ` NOOK yq aG - - T-r OC- - - IV-IT lY-„ -Y- Y 6G , ~ I , J mm. .Ydl CA41M'[fY d A 6 I X I - w y nZ vim - 'o LAUNDR KITCHEN POWDER DR rx a0 ,e D„ „s, - • 3NN2 DDd d " N ! ` - ry g I R = GARAGE a r Pa s - : 'i' Y- Y_Y Y_F f-9" 1'- Y-nY Y.y - -I l6r IBD~E -r I-i- ISPYFN LIVING i DINING ICI b ' O ac• ~ I r~ . I ' a W)D W BB ENTRY I a - 1 NNl ~ ~ I 1 ~ ~ ID'-1' ID'-r 66 SW •-IC ~-I ~ T- PORCH WL B!Y MAIN FLOOR PLAN A MAIN FLOOR NOTES ieD2rtaa1 A 7WW'L Wf 4151xY_1NM' ASRNLI 9V96 d ,51 Rlld OPT. BAY PLANS ^P qs: o ~a xsu Wx AIU ,p' DWYIdz zo NroB .e-. PACx 1Nf41p1FD DNERRY n.1WC.~ auT NN fd51n S-Y Y D' S'-P 4 uxAKKilxfO NIY~ W rnww NNL Ynr asa surlNx; d snxs AS WDrtu aYSOUCnNw b ~MRnCR 1~ b~ KWn. _ 6 MWl® SYxp[,K Sr[IE ro1EW d fYRIxR WL 4FATMG d SII.M 4 - AS NJ1FD d51WCMH # IMF Y xif~W(R 1~/Z~4 AY BW. rnltlFl- FAMILY tP. T-9'CL 9tlIX bffR.IYA~IYxY iES ,fi•>c NC1EIdiK k 1fFTCK ChR IN R, d nmow NNl surlac d snns FAMILY N DNm n.tmru uti. nnN mism.-mw mo- I/Y.,'-D' IV~~rnvq l/f to oSx 91EAMNG d LID iLWf -0SBdIJp51S 00p As ann d smucnnx nuNWL: ¢ OD~ ,/r ra asB. vunWw d LID {LPN 1Y515 Cfl I XI53 Y Ip1fD d $1BIICRRK nPYI11S M ~v NI {IPx 0N4` ,/1' LIP. BDNID 41 DIN G D. eAHWBxr xrcx musaY*sY = C ~LL SR BInKTniY fP.nA,NN ftHIS (O o IY•,nDrx! m m~e aB rtAh, V l) m (DNE~ NDRD DIXQMZ.) ^ 0 0 r 1 Slf CID3W' W1FD DDfP , N«Aw.A,FB IEAUB RDr. S NH®R4L/dµ~/y B. ItlE Q fgIDAMN B6M a B. uY[ or Innn10 ABNE Q (n C iq fl ~GNAIE DDIX CCp> B.~ ~fIMA .•AI OrtPoIFAD A~~Gv W 0 ,a «NDI x DY » I2. 1N Pf101 O 1}.IPMNN. Cbm21F PAT4 srD~ LIVING 96Wll .,w LIVING /!'-l'-V I_w~ AREA SCHEDULE SMJW r F WINK C YW M1O lm~ M5 LYrFN M1COI N 11% .I. lhnC WA M1, zI. iA <i ik W Y Y X> 0 p1(pt SI H m W.YI15rYi 1~ HMDfitB3) -fN Z ria srL~s U91 CDIM,Ot If w B,YiNaikY~ IT . ~91 ll. M O 0.GP 511HL NRT YM PT9nND BUdx: m oa u m s y 1~ . PJ~~~ ~ n YlIL MIN . W!U . z!. dxs Lun wsr. M BwmL p S w N L V, N V• . I E t ~ U) on aN xu ua a dal n rca a® n UNIT2624 w a< aA DO1M ! Fi36 A2.1 OIV®V.11Y6 OILY 1 I. r I PARTIAL PLAN C ; OPT. BEDROOM 5 DINING 1 zmm -1C ,r- IY-n r-r • T-' • r-r -I l--OPB AY - A 1 n NAI Rd't s-tflc xxD wn snm 4- RDIO sn p MAS ROEDROOM ,G-IV N'_~i Y f IC-T " BEDROO 2 =1 M.BATH ~ p 11 ~ IW'L a dL Y.l. Y _ i___ OpEV 'C ^ T x g , ' ' hi~ ~ Yp x RA_ °i M BEDROOM 3 c W.I.C. MAIN BAT d„ r-roc r-f 1-Y '-6' dMt 11-41 _ L 4 u l xR IJ R w a u~ b ,d5 nw I ( ,i3A A3 z A R/s q ~nm fti , «g' - 4 IY-3 Y- Y-r r_J LOFT/ BEDR OM 4 i r_Yt~ n-R 6 D9U 03 N iR MID ROT w I i '-,1' - Y- S-R ' Y-a IC-,P A-A IY-5' Ip_9' Jo'-r UPPER FLOOR PLAN A WAIL 114•-r-0' 1-11 x'7 n-R A LOFT/ BEDROOM 4 mw ro &IDR 7 r-JnD 6 9➢ 41N JM N I ~w A ry _I• !-x• 5•-1 • VA, iT-5 ID'-Y PARTIAL PLAN C W ' 114•-1'-0• M•- OPT. BAY PLANS UPPER FLOOR NOTES taxsDdr--- I. A ~IIW R.1T~06R y ,5, MT m w ,S/ xax a mrn0 xa nnlsgs a w xf oc iM xAU,pl xAVI' oxrwx m R¢c -JRYII uxxss RDED 0nm■2 RI. YIIAfACRXfD 11 s[IA a IXRRw Y4 !D!b nSfl 9rATY1G d sons As xon a snnntwu wA.WS _ xmxw I/Y DY91Y eoum. RzrmnusmY wrn Mli VMM:V■ Ibl'IRY SINTIE; S1tlE \9rn1 d Dowd wru v..e.n d snra As xalm d sn6R.~nx N1f1D]G I~ 4T9Y PWn. ffiv f0.UYC dAWYS 8111R'u \fl®1 MY x0axdfAt h glp'J! D,{R ,Jx RL d tdwm R.1LL su»mw a solos A5 NO1FD d SdA9PN CIUWXCS N1FAw I/Y 6'R9d Rdln, [I. tl Y4^ J/f t!C nS& sGItWG d LID flCd d wmk HDRD . a $AVCNDIL F0515 A$ dA\YIIIf~S a.lmcu IivrtR nom caISIRICIrx J/1' TW n5R 9GDw1' d L,o x1aR AbIS d naKpRp I-.asls As xDlm a snR:luua mAwx6S uwl nam m■c I/Y CR. B]A0 E ~m cow W ]0;5 Q p9" ME.., 2 Wok DUm ~ 1 0 T y L mth a Q N c„ Q m E` 00m 2 C r~ ~ a C S s 0 N L D _ co Mimi co YY HM IfOL Yi aV1F ly6 GfDID R UNIT2624 am Rns sim VIB Am R. oxwlw A2.2 MASTER BEDROOM 1W fA414 9' 4P SW tx1 Q/MA ~ rclu s w, LR91 lum uIN RArz Yw ROd eix ~sdnE PaoE ` I e1$ RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION SOUL t/0'_t'-n' C Cver gi /e r wT(m) x RAZE 11FRA RRF YAM flAIE SnpEA NPY YIN i1Wf xoT. n" I li roY 2.8 101 MI `~F tx a hI ~3ay EFT ELEVATION0» -m.n run - mRR RA2 LOFT MBR n W.I.C. MBATH T-Y ¢G T-Y ¢6 ~ n Y-9' ¢6 9-i' ¢6 ~ n.C2 - ~~RWY AW RAR - _ WS1R Rp/ IoMEX %A1F LIVING FAMILY nn GARAGE DEN N on xx. m T-s• ¢n nn r4 ac Y$ n.n - NY RWI I nF ;pFR R¢R BASEMENT . . CRAWL SPACE ~ BA9gif R1Uf _ 1.6 iDJ1Y4 BUILDING SECTION A-A BUILDING SECTION B-B EXTERIOR ELEVATION NOTES 1. s~ean A A4Wx d vmrw x/IC aSN. otnc d AI$S 1 N 6C YM N4UlY'N NO 1/7 dYldl W b4E ~ -IMNYL 1Nf511WR➢ OofNYY -Y ~Ila H'IWI. 1Ru1 pYafR 1g1 M RAW ~W d _ -Y[ RiN s/.al RM1R[R rNL T/IF nsa 9FATMG -ItM RAA- ~SnWSrs_wrtvd SlYCfd4. ml~ ~ IRE® 511111LK SRI[ HIIIR d gp -u14G R¢d MNoITE3IWL 9fAMNG d SIIW N -t'"Y RAC u «RO d smWlwx d"tYla puNwm b11AYR 1/C orosw eoAln aev Sv+m1 1¢,mm eMac YIMm N4~ f(a1Rw?W -YUl Rod BID]t 19EtA v/,1191NY 1E516 ac T.U. -IM mm a 1 IiIm VhR 15, ml d IXIFRIR NNL 9CA11YW d m uwWOd ouwxus smWnnu ~Nm Yuwaz 1/C c,vsu soAm a ill WOE _ !/1' Ta aM 9 T)i W d No flLO1.0.515 d MptlpRD 0 4 >YV rm¢rs AS IIORO d slnucnMu mY 7 O ai i Q. `mom"" ` a o Q o s/r ra na 9FAMW6 mN~ d blo Ram Y156 d d~aam .usrs m w m m STMCIUYl [ d"YYMS YUI Ram ¢tHO I/Y o LL w Wr. BJIm y tlMIP.-~ • p0 m- 4F S,RUCMPN fON aw W ' - l 2 RIM11Egl/® Bf~IIXKR4 ~ L,, AA ~ x 'M'i s~ Am a Ly m Nw x 4W CWD111AR POI .ICIIW 9R nMf11b6 O V/[ 1. le(54 /RpR ~ tS E Y T9 ~ g,.q ~ bY m Ka ajpµx m 0 5 rj ,r sxurRN b1 C11oEP tId 3E aEiY 5/m., Z W } 0 J W 8 N O P W Y L co w E ` E / _I Av IAl Y][ J VM b W Q ~p ~ UNIT ""'4 YY Mm Ml YK ¢tpp } t- I a FRONT ELEVATION A SCAM f/!_f-' iv -4 ROOF PLAN SCAIL 1/B'_,'-a' lam-N In FA Ixx Er,rw s¢musw Y UP SPC IPffB FUM 1 RFR RW h RI uAel Mfi uAB Row (TF) 612 6 MI m. 6 1x1 WN .N161 Igd11W. EXTERIOR ELEVATION NOTES (idrtls'tt6T"' "1>e~elrz - A TM[H WO LwSBxYIYYP ' r6 qB I/ II 0 l a Iz . - 1145/m Rtl a - y~ x~ - AtlI5451 if nC YM N9lAMw . - : ND-1/(YM1YMLtO N Iz IY kR Mk22B -rwx'x IfxESS xBlm Y21 x Gtx s ~a - IM fASax r m lc f • u n B1.11A °Y"1I - 1 Y , ~ w p l~I S YMp(,µT/® n 7/ir xm $B.wa t10 _ _ _ _ /W I 4F O l LWFA MI[ TfDl hj M SRUAS5W1/O SN4 . IN W Buwx¢ - - - v x~Be0T~ 4 ~4kl 9oum" tx.. _ f : ~ x 6~ WAI G161R nw el] IM1PFR ftIXF 2LE1® $11111E/[ SIIYf IURF a _ _ _ - Yµ,"m pltflLw Wl9CAtOGw511U$ wErxR stoE fiP M/an a SrINCrtw0. 3 OEUt 10/mI, 0 M1fUw G19AN YJA9 B} rrwY Ben'. NNFx a5 x M YIW ROR &EIX qEw YASBAY 1FS IC - rAf. NwliwBt k 1Efl11LLL O.w IS/ rR1 b fi VP 4YHG w FN YALL 9EATaC w $rUl ,I, W aslBxnw2twxwxas, • 1M MB0NR 1/2 G193.IY PAlfm. LEFT ELEVATION ,/I' 0G OSB. SGI a 1 flf X158 m w SCNF: 1/B•~1'-0' 1>0'.1 m 1-JJSIS.IS Will) aslFllC11,M rW1 PiAYWS „1- lkt a58 IC a Jm III S )IM I-nsm M As N DM M a srBlciwz WS Y.a ROfP Q6LW 11T w P. BaYm Me tB.lwn BflAC»Yrnrcx axsnnrnnY i BI trot z B2o$fs d%mwQk% In sRYaE 31f~ 1x1 fuBA ,mrc2z AS IROLOFD Irc tact .2 rle;xc wv MY z w2ix mrolxos v2X fT01 slne,t Beam vY2t sFarx nn (Rp. " 6 LWd4VAlf 14R AM& SIU WNnaS m mfl (6/&2) p fVAAa MlT rl.tlA 1. E .nsrs Bta oBOYB x t Tr~ 9W K U iz Ix AsAS n BY 6 IY6 fASn\ 6 6' UV $CWI i 1 ~Y IX. WMFA / SQ CE2K 5 AD.1 - aiFR MR BI wxo/w A2YB ti li 11111 11.1111 1PW 11P. - YAN RAl[ 6 U➢ 9gNG 1n YO]a flMM" W Pw RI WT SIDE [M 00 5[L Cfru {//211.1 (x/xtoIX w2BBIX n YAN RWI a. B-B YI POSI A-p N ROOF_ PLAN PBx TRJSYS UN nL 17 12 6~ ~6 0H M.- oNCFA1rNS5 dT2 nit LOFT MBR - - >-s' na r-sr na. LIVING FAMILY ¢ an >-r ac BASEMENT BUILDING SECTION A-A rnb wxi 11/ m tBY rs b~ 6 12 12 etz FEll RIGHT ELEVATION s/y wx REAR ELEVATION soot 1/e'-1'-0- I~-n scut: I/6-.1'-0' [awl<t //6e/t Gouge mA i 2flU5S FRONT ELEVATION C PM 1.9145 W. O.C IIW -WS W4 nC rs Q6 n.x _ ywvw nArc W.I.C. MBATH B'-Y ac P-Y nc no -Yoko IUY GARAGE DEN D x-Y nc ncac n.n _iolgROa± CRAWLSPACE _ eA,I rb/w BUILDING SECTION B-B Om ~ ~Nm (1 W >O b mco< E 302 o o13om m2% poi DVS, _W Nm~ =qa Q NcM O ~ c') 0 O 2 5 ~ a Z w W O O N _I co Y Bin A UNff 2624 xa, wY .uxxmw xi, A3.C S Section 6.5 Landscaping, Buffering, Screening, Fences, and Walls 6.5.12 Outdoor Retail Display Areas The following standards apply to outdoor retail display areas that will be occupied for more than 30 consecutive days in any zoning district, including a PUD District, unless a different standard is explicitly stated in an approved PUD plan. rr A. No outdoor retail display area may be located on $ Yequired parking area except for approved temporary outdoor sales B. No outdoor retail display area may be located on a required landscaped area C- The amount of permitted outdoor retail display area in the CC-District shall be as follows (percentage of total lot area): 1. CC-A Sub-District: 100% 2. CC-B Sub-District: 0% 1 CC-C Sub-District: 75% 4. CC-D Sub-District:: 0% 5. CC-E Sub-District: 75% D. In Sub-District CC-C, outdoor retail display shall consistof only licensed and/or titled vehicles and trailers, boats, pools and spas, and landscape and building materials. Additional merchandise categories may be approved by the City only through the conditional use procedure set forth in §3.14 of this Code. 6.6.1 General Intent for All Buildings All new primary structures in the Standard Zoning Districts, New Communities Sub-Districts, Clear Creek Sub-Districts, and PUD Districts should strive to meetthe following goals, unless more specific goals for a particular area or type of building are stated elsewhere, and those more specific goals are inconsistent with the general intent statements below. A. Visual Interest and Compatibility. New buildings should create visual interest in ways that are compatible with the architectural character of the surrounding area, through the use of similar elements such as rooflines, materials, colors, fenestration, and other architectural details. This standard shall apply to new buildings that are part of an existing activity center or other unified, planned development, including all development in a PUD zoning district. B. Texture and Relief. All buildings should create texture and relief in facades, should avoid large, flat, unbroken, wall planes, and should take advantage of the sun to bring out changes in plane, material, and detail through light and shadow. C. Human Scale Detailing. Facades of buildings that face the street should incorporate human scale detailing through the use of reveals, belt courses, cornices, expression of structural or architectural bays, recessed windows or doors, material or material module changes, color and/or texture differences, or strongly expressed mullions. D. Public Entries. Primary public entries of buildings should be emphasized through the use of differing colors or materials, arches, arcades, or other architectural treatments. E. Materials. All primary buildings should use materials that are durable, economically maintained, and of a quality that will retain their appearance over time. Colors. Large areas of wall should be subdued in color and not reflective. Bright or highly saturated hues shall be used sparingly and limited to accenting a building, and Page 6-32 Article 6: Development Standards Section 6.6 Building Design Materials Colors and Lighting shall not be used to act as signs or create "sign buildings." Monotonous color palettes are strongly discouraged. G. Mechanical Equipment. For all primary structures rooftop, wall-mounted, and ground-mounted mechanical equipment and appurtenances shall be screened so that they ar4not visible when viewed from public streets or the ground level of adjacent properties. 6.6.2 The following general standards shall apply to all new residential single-family, duplex, and multi-family structures in all zoning districts, including PUD Districts. These standards are in addition to the more specific design standards for single-family/duplex dwellings in §6.6.3 and for multi-family dwellings in §6.6.4 below. A. Intent. All residential buildings shall emphasize the location and importance of entryways, and shall avoid tall, monotonous facades near street frontages. B. Facade Materials 1. Wher d face. Highly reflective opaque materials, natural cinder block, and metals are not permitted as exterior finishes. 2. Siding material shall be continued down to within 9 inches of finished grade on any elevation. C. Facade and Roof Colors. 1. Primary or other bright colors should be used sparingly and only as accents. 2. In addition, all building projections, including, but not limited to, chimneys, flues and vents, shall match in color the permanent color of the surface from which they project or match the building's trim color. The Community Development Director may approve alternatives where the color or material of a projection, such as a brick or stone chimney, complements the permanent color of the surface from which it projects. D. Entryway Design. The front entry of any residential structure with no porch shall be emphasized by the use of at least two of the following: 1. An elevation at least 1 foot above the grade of the nearest sidewalk, 2. The location of the front door in a visually prominent location; 3. The inclusion of side-lights (glazed openings to the side of the door), and transom-lights (glazed opening above the door) in the entry design; or 4. The installation of tallerormore dense landscaping than would otherwise be required near the entryway. E Side Facade Design . Where a side facade of a residential building abuts a street, the facade shall be designed to provide human scale by the use of 1. At least one change in the vertical or horizontal wall plane within 20 feet above grade. 2. At least one change in the color or material of the wall, 3. Provision of a bay window, porch or balcony; 4. Detailing the wall with reveals, belt courses, cornices, projections or other devices,- or 5. Provision of windows or glazed doors to overlook the street. Rear Facade Design- Double frontage lots shall be required to comply with §6.2.2 (Double Frontage Lots), which require the use of greater Article 6: Development Standards Page 6-33 k, Section 6.6 Building Design Materials Colors and Lighting building setbacks or stepped setbacks for taller buildings. In addition, primary structures of two stories or more that are located on sites where the rear lot line is adjacent to a sidewalk without a tree lawn shall incorporate at least one of the following rear elevation treatments: 1. At least 50% of the building facades shall have a brick or stone cladding extending from ground elevation to the eav of the building, or 2. At least 50% of the building facades shall~hbve a minimum 4 foot horizontal difference in the rear wall plane at the height of one of the floors. G. Residential walkout structures where the rear of the structure is visible from a public right-of-way shall incorporate at least one of the following rear elevation treatments: 1. At least 50% of the rear building facade shall have a brick or stone cladding extending from ground elevation to the eave of the building; or 2. At least 50% of the rear building facade shall have a minimum 4 foot horizontal difference in the rear wall plane at the height of one of the floors. H. Universal Design. Wherever possible, primary structures for residential use are strongly encouraged to incorporate elements of "universal design," such that the structures may be accessible to persons of all ages and abilities for the life of the structure. For example, dwelling units may be designed with at least one no-step entrance, wider interior doorways and hallways, wall reinforcement in bathrooms, and accessible environmental controls and light switches. 6.6.3 Single Family Detached / Duplex Residential Architecture In addition to the general standards set forth in §6.6.2 (Residential Architecture) above, the following standards shall apply to each new subdivision or PUD containing 10 or more single-family or two-family (duplex) dwelling units in all zoning districts. A. Intent. The architectural design of the single-family detached homes and duplex homes should create visual variety, promote an integrated character for the neighborhood, and avoid monotony in home designs and layouts. B. CINNE-ft Fifty percent of all street access garages shall use at least one of the following devices. ~a 1. Recessed Garage Doors: Garage doors facing the street shall be recessed a minimum of 4 feet behind either: a. The front wall plane of the house, or b. The front wall plane of a porch that extends horizontally at least 30 feet or across 75% of the remaining facade of the house, whichever is greater. 2. Separation of Garage Doors. All two- and three-car garages with doors that face the street shall include at least one 2-foot wide column or an additional 2jpotfaeade.setback separating each two garage doors. 3. Side Loaded Garages: Garage doors shall be located at a right angle to the - s#reet (or as closely as possible), and the design of the garage wall facing the street shall be faced with the same predominant materials used on the remainder of the front house facade. See Table 6.2.1 for permitted setback reductions. 4. Rear Yard Garages: The garage shall be located to the rear of the house either as a detached structure or as a part of the house. If constructed as part of the house, the front wall of the garage shall be set back at least 15 feet behind the front facade of the house. See Table 6.2.1 for permitted setback reductions. s Page 6-34 Article 6: Development Standards N Section 6 .6 Building Design Materials Colors and Lighting C. Facade and Porch Requirements. 1. Except as exempt under C.2 below, the minimum cladding and front porch requirements for single-family detached or duplex dwelling units shall be Feature Mini um Requirement [a] 75% brick or stone front facade up to 25~o of all homes the eave line (All 100% clad homes on corner lots count towards this minimum requirement) [b] Covered front porch with a minimum An additional 25°% area of 25 sq. ft., extending at least 4 of all homes ft. beyond the front wall plane of the home [c) Either an all brick or stone front An additional 25% facade up to the eave line, or a of all homes covered porch [d] Neither an all brick or stone front A maximum of 25% of all homes facade up to the eave fine, nor a covered porch MIN. Ci o MIN. 2'0 BP.ICK. FRONT CO,'ERFO F.i1-ACE5 FRONT POR'HF=: sl X. 2d1 f3•.t.L:',NCE OF'TCK NEII HER IWICK F=I.(hDE5 ANDPI)K, NOR FOW:HES FRONT rGKCHF- Brick and Porch Cladding Distribution 2. Exemption for Final Lots. The cladding and porch requirements in subsection C.1 above shall not apply to the final 10% of lots or the final 10 lots, whichever is smaller, in the approved final subdivision orapproved final phase of a subdivision, provided that the amount of homes with neither brick/stone cladding nor covered porches shall not exceed 30% of all homes. 3. Application of Cladding. Where brick or stone cladding or stucco is used, they must be applied to logical places on the building facade, and cladding shall begin and end at logical breaks related to the structure of the house (such as ground floor window sill level, ceiling lines, or interior corners of projecting bays or similar elements). . and must wrap all sides of a column on which it is used. Belt coursing such as rowlock, header, and/or other suitable course patterns shall be used to transition from brick and stone to other materials. Article 6: Development Standards Page 6-35 Section 6.6 Building Design, Materials Colors and Lighting' D. Roof Design and Materials. - 1. Roof Pitch and Design. Roof slopes shall have a ii~c.'> _ - nd shall have The maximum length of a continuous roof ridgeline is 35 feet. At least 50% of all units shall have a roofline that changes elevation at least once. 2. Roof Materials. Roofs of single-family det ched and duplex homes may be constructed of conventional asphalt (3-015) roofs, but roofs constructed of clay or concrete tiles, slate, Masonite, or heavy duty/hail resistant dimensional composition are preferred. E. Additional Standards r R-NT Zone Distri t. 1. Lots of at lea'si dths, differing by at least 5 feet, shall be incorporated into each block. 2- when viewed from the street in front of such residential units. 1__~ Residential units on corner lots shall have a minimum of two occupied /r stories, when viewed from the street in front of such residential units. 4. At least 50% of all residential units shall have a covered front porch with a o minimum area of 25 square feet, extending at least 4 feet beyond the front ( wall plane of the home. 44, t" 5. Where street-accessed garaged'are used, at least 50% of all curb cuts for Z ` garages shall be no wider than 12 feet 6. See §5.3.3.8, which allows accessory dwelling units in the R-NT District, subject to specified conditions. 6.6.4 Multi-Family (Including Single-Family Attached) Residential Architecture The following standards shall apply to all new multi-family residential structures, including single-family attached residential structures, in the Standard Zoning Districts, New Communities Sub-Districts, Clear Creek Sub-Districts, and PUD Districts. A. Intent. Multi-family shall be designed housing to reflect the same level of quality, detail, and craftsmanship similar to single-family housing. & General Requirements. The architectural design of all multi-family residential structures shall comply with all requirements of §6.6.2 (Residential Architecture) as well as the requirements of this section. C. Site Planning. 1. Multi-family sites of 10 acres or more shall include a minimum of one public street or private drive that is built to the city standards, is continuous through the site, and connects to a public street on both ends. The Community Development Director may waive this requirement for a through-access street or drive if the Applicant shows there are adequate alternatives available for residents and vehicles to travel through the development to adjacent properties and developments. 2. Primary structures should be placed so that open space amenities occur between buildings, and so that open spaces are visible from curves in streets, to maximize the perception of open space within the development. 3. Primary structures and landscaping should be located and designed so that residents can easily observe the common open spaces, circulation paths, and access points into the development. 4. At least 50% of required off-street parking shall be provided in garages, rather than surface lots. Where surface parking lots are used, they should be located between buildings, rather than adjacent to street frontages, wherever possible: Page 6-36 Article 6: Development Standards FROhiEI,ODY_MMES INC (FRI) 6. 6' 03 :109/ST. 9;09/NO. 4863156100 P 1 _ raye i ; From: 'Darrel Pennington To: marya@ci.wheatridge.co.us Subject: Skyline3 Mary, Sory this has taken some time to send to you. Below I have restated notes 3 and 4 from the ODP. Per our discussions last week; would you take a quick look at this and see if you would concur. Also, I have a sample picture of what the side of the homes looks like. The trim and slicing enhancements help considerably, I will go ahead and fax this to you as well. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks dp. 3. Residential structures on corner lots shall have along the "side of the home a four foof return of decorative wainscoting treatment of either b. ick or stone, two windows, trim board enhancements, variation in siding material, and all visible.side yards shall have-i5bvacy fence to help screen and break up the side plane of the home. Overall h"de and a-chitecture shall conform to the plans included in this document. 4. The front setback shall, vary.a minimum of 2.5 feet so that no more than one-third of any street frontage . shall have homes with 'setbacks of 20 feet, 22.5 feet, and 25 feet, No three adjacent structures shall have the same front setback. rfirM FROM MELODY HOMES i'.. a <z9 ~a Ozer > 0 t3' tP x VI Y~~^l or 0 z ~ m Neg. x - (FRI) 6. 6'03 9:0. 9:09/NO.4863156100 P 2 MASTER DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS OF SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO.1 THIS MASTER DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDIT SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 1 ("Master Declaration") is made and Delaware corporation ("Master Declarant"). WHEREAS, Master Declarant is the owner Colorado, which is described on Exhibit A, attaphed WHEREAS, Master Decl covenants, conditions, restrictions, set forth herein; and WHEREAS, a only by recording.a der county in which and RPM in the name of the court name of each ersmi a the common ~terestlcti LIONS OF Homes, Inc., a inty of Jefferson, State of reference; and described on Exhibit A certain liabilities and other charges y )ity ma}-1'i created pursuant to CCIOA (as hereinafter defined) sae manner as a deed. The declaration must be recorded in every t community is located and must be indexed in the grantee's index and in the name of the association, and in the grantor's index in the No common interest community is created until the plat or map for NOWT; THEREFORE, Master Declarant hereby declares that a plat which includes the property described on the attaclfi& h a as been recorded and that all of the real property described on that attached Exhibit A shall be held, sold,_and conveyed subject to the following covenants, conditions, restrictions, easements, rights-of- way, obligations bilities, charges and other provisions set forth herein, which shall run with, the above-described property andlKe binding on all parties having any right, title, or interest in the above-described property or any part thereof, their heirs, personal representatives, successors, and assigns, and shall inure to the benefit of each owner thereof. ARTICLE 1. Section 1.1. Agencies. "Agencies" mean the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA), the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC), the Department of Housing and Urban Development, including the Federal Housing Administration (HUD), the Veterans Administration (VA) or any other governmental or quasi-governmental agency or any other public, quasi-public or private entity which performs (or may in the future perform) functions similar to those currently performed by any of such entities. Section 1.2. Allocated Interests. "Allocated Interests" means the share of Assessments and votes in the Master Association allocated to each Lot. The Allocated Interest for each Lot shall be a fraction, the numerator of which is one (1) and the denominator of which is the total number of Lots within the Community from time to time. Section 1.3. AnnexableArea. "Annexable Area" means the property described on Exhibit D attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, plus such additional real estate from such locations as the Master Declarant hereby reserves the right to elect in its sole discretion in an amount not to exceed the maximum pernritted pursuant to CCIOA. Section 1.4. Assessment "Assessment" means annual Assessments and special Assessments, which are provided for in this Master Declaration. For purposes of Sections 4.1, 4.9 through 4.13, and 12.6 of this Master Declaration, "Assessment" means annual Assessments, special Assessments and late charges, fines, fees, interest, costs, expenses, reasonable attorneys' fees, and any other charges, which are provided for in this Master Declaration. 1 Section 1.5. Board of Directors or Board "Board of Directors" or "Board" means the body, regardless and the Bylaws of the Master Association to act on behalf Section 1.6. CCIOA. "CCIOA" means the Colorado Common Section 1.7. "Common Elements" means exist for the common use of Master Declaration are descri Master Declaration et seq., as amended. Master Association other than a Lot which Elements at the time of recordation of this red herein by this reference. Comt mmm mead the rQ -iin I° cribed on Fxhih;t A to this Master Declaration, as supplemented and amended from hme tottmte land wtth respo which a Person, by virtue of such Person's ownership of a Lot, is obligated to pay fo3riea esta4e~ taxes tttfance premiums, maintenance or improvement of other real estate described in this Master De2latahgzt Th CoWunity is a planned community under CCIOA. The name of the Community is Skyline Estate§--,Fil q. Sectloil~ t Design Review Committee or Committee. "Desigwkeview Committee" or "Committee" means the committee appointed by the Master Declarant or by the Master Association to review and approve or disapprove plans for Improvements, as more fully provided in this Master Declaration. Section 1.10. Development Rights. "Development Rights" means the following rights or combination of rights hereby reserved by the Master Declarant, as such Development Rights may be further described in this Master Declaration, to: 1.10.1. add real estate to this Community, as provided in Section 13.5 of this Master Declaration (Annexation; Withdrawal); 1.10.2. subdivide or replat Lots, as provided in Section 13.7 of this Master Declaration (Subdivision or Replatting of Lots); or 1.10.3. withdraw real estate from this Community, as provided in Section 13.5 of this Master Declaration (Annexation; Withdrawal). The Master Declarant may exercise its Development Rights in all or any portion of the Community, and no assurances are made as to the boundaries or order of exercise of any such development rights. The Master Declaranf s right to exercise Development Rights shall terminate automatically as provided in Section 1.24 of this Master Declaration (Special Master Declarant Rights). Section 1.11. Improvements. "Improvements" means all improvements, structures, and any appurtenances thereto or components thereof, of every type and kind, and all landscaping features, including, but not limited to, buildings, outbuildings, swimming pools, tennis courts, patios, patio covers, awnings, solar collectors, painting or other finish materialO* any visible structure, additions, walkways, sprinkler systems, garages, carports, driveways, fences, screening walls, etaining walls, stairs, decks, landscaping, hedges, windbreaks, plantings, trees, shrubs, flowers, vegetables, 3Sod gragel, bark, exterior light fixtures, basketball hoops, poles, signs, exterior tanks, and exterior air conditiomngfcooung, ty' and and water softening 71 equipment. .:a Section 1.12. Initially Unoccupied Lots. "Initially Unoccupied Lots" means only those I than the Master Declarant. Section 1.13. Lot t "Lot" means each platted lot showiPU on rn r attached Exhibit A, as the same maybe resubdiurdei or r in this Master Declaration), or any.o Tealplogerf. as Association, with the except on offihe rumor Eler tents a "unit" under CCIOA andiLs1a71'nOt bE7neces.,~atyta_uust Lot. initial Owner other 11 corded`subdivisitiff map of the real property described on the pk tt6d*d'ra time to time (subject to the restrictions contained mayAe edfter be brought within the jurisdiction of the Master and publicly dedicated property. Each Lot shall constitute the term "unit" as a part of a legally sufficient description of a Included. Lots that M MBe Included _'i ans five hundred (500) Lots, which shall be the maximum number of Lots that may be subject-fp'3hrs 5'AasterlDeelafafion, including the Lots within the property described on the attached Exhibit A and those Lots which may bedded if all of the Annexable Area is annexed to this Master Declaration. However, the aforesaid numbe ofl..mtS Mi May Be Included is not a representation or a guarantee as to the actual number Lots that will ultimately be-inelut`fed in or constructed as part of the Community. Section 1.15. Master Association. "Master Association" means Skyline Estates Filing No. 1 Master Association, hic., a community association as provided in CCIOA. Section 1.16. Master Declarant. "Master Declarant" means Melody Homes, hic., a Delaware corporation, and any other Person(s) acting in concert, to whom the Master Declarant, by recorded document, expressly assigns one or more of the Master Declarant's rights under this Master Declaration (which shall be the extent of the Master Declaranfs rights to which such assignee succeeds), and who: 1.16.1. As part of a common promotional plan, offers to dispose of to a purchaser such Master Declaranfs interest in a Lot not previously disposed of to a purchaser; or 1.16.2. Reserves or succeeds to any Special Master Declarant Right. Section 1.17. Master Declaration. "Master Declaration" means this Master Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions of Skyline Estates Filing No. 1 and any other recorded instruments, however denominated, that create this Community, including any supplements and amendments to those instruments and also including, but not limited to, plats and maps. Section 1.18. Member. "Member" means all Owners of a Lot collectively or, following termination of the Community, of all former Owners entitled to distributions of proceeds under CCIOA or their heirs, personal representatives, successors or assigns. The Master Association shall have one (1) class of membership. Membership in the Masfe Association shall be appurtenant to, and may not be separated from ownership of a Lot. Each Lot shall havenone, dl) membership in the Master Association and there is only one (1) Member per Lot, even if the Lot is owned by.mu-t i Owners. Section 1.19. Owner. "Owner" means each fee simple title holder of a other Person who owns a Lot, but does not include a P< obligation. There may be more than one (1) Owner of a Lot Section 1.20. Person. "Person" means a natural nei company, a joint venture, or any other Section 1.21. Master Declarant or ly as security for an a trust, a limited liability State of Colorado. "Security Interest Lml an rdterest rt~sgestate or personal property created by contract or conveyance which secures payment ocperf ce b`f any" -9aadio . The term includes alien created by a mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed securijy deed Gonna ov_deeI tan santract, lease intended as security, assignment of leases or rents intended as secty, p~g Igef any ezslnpperest in the Master Association, and any other consensual lien or title retention contract' mienled'as sec~-f & an obligation. For purposes of Section 4.11 of this Master Declaration (Certificate of Status oflAssessxne d, w th respect to notice of cancellation or substantial modification of certain insurance pohcrest to Stecuoi5 6 3q°f this Master Declaration (General Provisions of Insurance Policies), "Security Interest" shall also rneantrrd z fer to any executory land sales contract wherein the Administrator of Veterans Affairs, an Officer of the United--- f America, is the seller, whether such contract is recorded or not, and whether such contract is owned by the _"said-Admhistrator or has been assigned by the Administrator and is owned by the Adm nistrator's assignee, or a reriot`e assignee, and the land records in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of the County in which the property is located, show the Administrator as having the record title to the Lot. Section 1.22. Security Interest Holder. "Security Interest Holder" means any Person named as a mortgagee or beneficiary, or in a similar capacity, under any Security Interest (including, for purposes of Section 4.11 of this Master Declaration (Certificate of Status of Assessments) and, with respect to notice of cancellation or substantial modification of certain insurance policies, to Section 6.3 of this Master Declaration (General Provisions of Insurance Policies), the Administrator of Veterans Affairs, an Officer of the United States of America, and such Adm nistrators assigns under any executory land sales contract wherein the said Administrator is identified as the seller, whether such contract is recorded or not and the land records of the Clerk and Recorder of the County in which the property is located, show the said Administrator as having the record title to the Lot), or any successor to the interest of any such Person under such Security Interest. Section 1.23. 75% Control Period. "75% Control Period" means a length of time expiring seven (7) years after initial recording of this Master Declaration in Jefferson County, Colorado. However, the 75% Control Period shall terminate earlier, upon the first to occur of the following events, if any, if any of the following occur within the time period that is specified in the first sentence of this Section: (a) sixty (60) days after conveyance of seventy-five percent (75%) of the Lots to Owners other than a Master Declarant; (b) two (2) years after the last conveyance of a Lot by the Master Declarant in the ordinary course of business; or (c) two (2) years after any right to add new Lots to the Master Declaration was last exercised. Section 1.24. Special Master Declarant Rights. "Special Master Declarant Rights" means the following rights, which rights are hereby reserved for the benefit of the Master Declarant, and which rights may be further described in this Master Declaration: to build and complete Improvements in the Community; to exercise any Development Right; to maintain sales offices construction offices, management offices, and signs advertising the Community and sale of Lots; to use easementsthrough the Common Elements for the purpose of making Improvements within the Community or within real estate vil ich may be added to the Community; to merge or consolidate a Community of the same form of ownership orgo appoint or remove any officer of the Master Association or any Board of Directors member during any 75°{o Cod troI'efibd. All of the Special Master Declarant Rights may be exercised by the Master Declarant with xespect to anyportronof the property now or hereafter within the Community. Master Declarant may exercise any or allof these Speww&W r teDeclarant Rights at any time and from time to time. Such rights shall term nafe an(omatical y. at.such lime-4s Mash Declarant no longer owns any portion of the Property described on the attacheo4ib st9 and D Section 1.25. "Subassociation" means any Colorado corporation oI Coldradoli tlitedliability company and its successors and assigns, organized and established or authorizes pursju latp,;of in connection with, one or more Supplemental Declarations, the membership of whidliAs composed of Owners,o Lots within the area covered by the Supplemental Declaration. Supplemental Declaration mean s_a'fvritten instrument containing covenants, conditions, restrictions, or equitable servitudes and/or .any othdrippx+isrons, or any combination thereof, which may be recorded on any portion of the oronetty dekiabed in the attaeed Exhibit A and/or the Annexable Area annexed to this Master Declaration. ARTICLE 2. 2.1. Master Association. The Master Association has been or will be formed as a Colorado corporation under the Colorado Revised Nonprofit Corporation Act. The Master Association shall have the duties, powers and rights set forth in this Master Declaration and in its Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws. As more specifically set forth hereinafter, the Master Association shall have a Board of Directors to manage its affairs; except as hereinafter provided, the Board of Directors shall be elected by the Members. Section 2.2. Board of Directors. The number, term and qualifications of the Board of Directors shall be fixed in the Master Association's Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws. The Board of Directors may, by resolution, delegate portions of its authority to an executive committee or to other committees, to officers of the Master Association or to agents and employees of the Master Association, but such delegation of authority shall not relieve the Board of Directors of the ultimate responsibility for management of the affairs of the Master Association. Action by or on behalf of the Master Association may be taken by the Board of Directors or any duly authorized executive comnittee, officer, agent or employee without a vote of the Members, except as otherwise specifically provided in this Master Declaration. Section 2.3. Voting Rights. Each Member shall be entitled to one (1) vote for each Lot owned except that no votes allocated to a Lot owned by the Master Association may be cast. The total number of votes which may be cast in connection with any matter shall be equal to the total number of Lots then existing within the Master Association. ARTICLE 3. MASTER ASSOCIATION Section 3.1. Authority of Board of Directors. Except as provided in this Master Declaration, the Articles of Incorpo Association, the Board of Directors may act in all instances on behalf of the Master Section 3.2. Election of Part of the Board of Directors No later than sixty (60) days after conveyance of to Owners other than a Master Declarant, at least one (1) directors must be elected by Members other than the Mast of fifty percent (50%) of the Lots that May Be Included to , and one-third percent (33 1/3%) of the directors must be el Section 3.3. Except as otherwise appointed by the Master Decl officers and members of the Declarant may voluntanly sp before ternunation ofibe 75° the 75% Control Pend, £ha recorded msfnlmnY e~cptei effective t Period. of the Master Period hat May Be Included percent (25%) of the lays after conveyance t less than thirty-three Declarant. e during the 75-0/a Control Period, the Master Declarant or Persons ,ficers andmet ers of the Board of Directors, and may remove all Bich haveen appointed by the Master Declarant. The Master `_aoirit and remove officers and members of the Board of Directors hat event, the Master Declarant may require, for the duration of the Master Association or Board of Directors, as described in a rant, be approved by the Master Declarant before they become Termination of 75% Control Period Not late Phan l ie icmunation of the 75% Control Period, the Members shall elect a Board of Directors, at least a majority of whom at be Owners other than the Master Declarant or designated representatives of Owners other than the Master Declarafit. The Board of Directors shall elect the officers. Section 3.5. Delivery of Property by Master Declarant After the Members other than the Master Declarant elect a majority of the Board of Directors, the Master Declarant shall deliver to the Master Association all property of the Owners and of the Master Association held by or controlled by the Master Declarant, if and to the extent required by CCIOA. Section 3.6. Budget. Within thirty (30) days after adoption of any proposed budget for the Community, the Board of Directors shall mail, by ordinary first-class mail, or otherwise deliver a summary of the Master Association budget to all the Members and shall set a date for a meeting of the Members to consider ratification of the budget not less than fourteen (14) nor more than sixty (60) days after mailing or other delivery of the summary. Unless at that meeting the budget is rejected by the vote or agreement of Members to which at least eighty percent (80%) of the votes in the Master Association are allocated, then the budget is ratified, whether or not a quorum is present. In the event that the proposed budget is rejected, the periodic budget last ratified by the Members must be continued until such time as the Members ratify a subsequent budget proposed by the Board of Directors. Section 3.7. Rules and Regulations. Rules and regulations affecting, concerning and governing the Lots, Common Elements, and/or this Community may be adopted, amended or repealed from time to time by the Board of Directors, and the Board of Directors may establish and enforce penalties for the infraction thereof, including, without limitation, the levying and collecting of fines (in accordance with Section 13.1 of the Master Declaration (Enforcement; Fines)) for the violation of any of such rules and regulations. The rules and regulations may state procedural requirements, interpretations and applications of the provisions of this Master Declaration, including without limitation, blanket requirements, blanket interpretations, and blanket applications. By way of example, and not by way of limitation, the Rules and Regulations may state that "reasonable" as used in Section 10.4 of this Master Declaration (Household Pets) means a specified number of pets. Any rules and regulations that are adopted shall be in accordance with, and sligall not be inconsistent with or contrary to, this Master Declaration and all provisions hereof. i Section 3.8. Master Association Books and Records. i The Master Association shall make available to Owners, prospectivetpurcliasers? Secunt3E Interest Holders, and insurers or guarantors of any such Security Interest, current cores of'dustMaserDeclaraho_ and the Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws, rules and regulations, books reeosds Ad fi ncia stag;rnen of th Master Association. "Available" shall mean available for inspection, upon reque t d 3 g nrma weelfid5y: usme hours or under other reasonable circumstances. Section 3.9. Informatwnegar~ngSecurylrtterestl Each Member shall, within twen 2t~3) daps of enc tyy( ua[berirt =mber's Lot with a Security Interest, and at other times upon request of the Master Assoctatronxrovrde the m:, " ster Association with the name and address of such Security Interest Holder, a copy ofthe instnriient(]creatingah J ecur ty Interest(s), and the loan number(s) (or other identifying number of such Securr 46#9 ) WJibin twenty (20) days after any change in the name or address of a Security Interest Holder onra- em ers.ot, aid at_-o} er times upon request of the Master Association, such Member shall provide -Fe'afoXeysaarl rpulthon f the AMQR'Wssociation with respect to each Security Interest held by such Security Interesodeg n-~lFSli and Other Contracts. Any agreementifor p£ofessronal management of the Master Association's business or other contract providing for the services of the Nlaen'Declarant shall have a maximum term of three (3) years and any such agreement shall provide for terming _0 . ether party thereto, with or without cause and without payment of a temrination fee, upon not more than nmetyM days' prior written notice; provided, however, that any such management agreement(s) entered into by the Master Association with a manager or managing agent prior to termination of the 75% Control Period shall be subject to review and approval by HUD or VA, if at the time such agreement is entered into, HUD has insurance or VA has a guarantee(s) on one or more Security Interests (and if HUD or VA requires such approval), and shall terminate absolutely, in any event, no later than thirty (30) days after termination of the 75% Control Period. Section 3.11. Cooperation with Subassociations, any Community Association(s) andlor any District(s). The Master Association shall have the right and authority at any time, from time to time, to enter into agreements and otherwise cooperate with any Subassociations, community association(s) and/or any district(s), to share the costs and/or responsibility for any maintenance, repair, reconstruction, or other matters, to perform maintenance, repair or reconstruction for any Person(s) in consideration of payment or reimbursement therefor, to utilize the same contractors, subcontractors, managers, or others who may perform services for the Master Association and/or any Subassociations, community association(s) and/or any district(s), or to otherwise cooperate with any Subassociations, community association(s), or any district(s), in order to increase consistency or coordination, reduce costs, or as may otherwise be deemed appropriate or beneficial by the Board of Directors in its discretion from time to time. The costs and expenses for all such matters, if any, shall be shared or apportioned between the Master Association and/or any Subassociations, community association(s) and/or any district(s), as the Board of Directors may determine in its discretion from time to time. Additionally, the Master Association shall have the right and authority at any time, from time to time, to enter into agreements and otherwise cooperate with one or more Subassociations, community association(s) and/or district(s) to collect Assessments, other charges, or other amounts which may be due to any Subassociations, community association(s) and/or district(s) and to permit any Subassociations, community association(s) and/or district(s) to collect Assessments, other charges, or other amounts which may be due to the Master Association; in any such instance, the Master Association shall provide for remittance to such Subassociations, community association(s) and/or such district(s) of any amounts collected by the Master Association or to the Master Association of any amounts collected by such Subassociations, community association(s) and/or such district(s). Section 3.12. Merger. The Master Declarant hereby reserves the right to merge the Master Association with one or more other common interest communities without the approval of any Owner or any other Person A This right shall teminate automatically as provided in Section 1.24 of this Master Declaration (Special Masten Ded-Jaza Ri lrts). ARTICLE 4. Section 4.1. Personal Obligation for Each Owner of a Lot, including so expressed in such deed, covenants and and all Assessments as provided in this b hereinafter provided. The obligation for. covenant with all amounts due fromAtir otherwise expressly provided in be jointly and severally liabVit Each Assessmentg4R be.tb'e~~ rt The personal oblgatiohfor'del title unless exprey asumedjb nt Jai acceptaneb o£ deederefor, whether or not it shall be obligated =t - ay to the Master Association any [lb, on nth sgch smM to be established and collected as by elach~ o the Master Association is an independent able in-idlwhen due without notice or demand (except as an with ut set-off or deduction. All Owners of each Lot shall for'e payment of all Assessments attributable to their Lot. Owner of such Lot at the time when the amount became due. rg Assessments) shall not pass to such Owner's successors in Assessments. The Assessments l6*d by the Master Association shall be used to promote the recreation, health, safety and welfare of the resrdents ofe Lots, and for all of those purposes and activities which may be required of the Master Association or wlneli the Master Association may be empowered to pursue pursuant to this Master Declaration or the Articles of Incorporn or Bylaws of the Master Association, or by law; provided, however, that such Assessments levied during the-0,75% Control Period may not be used for the purpose of constructing capital Improvements but may be used to maintain capital Irnprovements. Section 4.3. Initial Annual Assessment. Until the effective date of an Master Association budget ratified by the Members with a different amount for the annual Assessments, as provided above, the amount of the annual Assessment against each Lot shall not exceed Six Hundred Sixty and no/100 Dollars ($660.00) per annum, exclusive of any amounts due to any other community association and/or any other Person or entity. However, the rate of the Assessments paid by Initially Unoccupied Lots shall be less than those paid by the other Lots, as provided in the next Section. Section 4.4. Rate ofAssessment. 4.4.1. Annual and special Assessments shall be sufficient to meet the expected needs of the Master Association and shall be apportioned among the Lots in accordance with their Allocated Interests. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, the amount of the annual Assessment against the Initially Unoccupied Lots shall be set at a lower rate than that charged against other Lots, because the Initially Unoccupied Lots receive and benefit from fewer services funded by the Assessments than the other Lots. Colorado Revised Statutes §38-33.3-315(3)(b) states that "Any common expense or portion thereof benefitting fewer than all of the units shall be assessed exclusively against the units benefitted." Based on this provision, the Initially Unoccupied Lots shall pay annual and special Assessments at the rate of forty percent (40%) of any annual Assessment or special Assessment charged to Lots other than the Initially Unoccupied Lots. The annual Assessments shall include an adequate reserve fund for the maintenance, repair and replacement of those items that must be maintained, repaired and replaced on a periodic basis, and for the payment of insurance deductibles. 4.4.2. During the 75% Control Period, the Master Declarant may in its discretion, but shall not be required to, cover certain costs of the Master Association by payment of any amount(s), which shall be treated as an advance against Assessments then or thereafter due from the Master Declarant; provided, however, that any such advances which have not been credited against Assessments due from the MasYgr Declarant as of termination of the 75% Control Period shall then be repaid by the Master Associatid'n to the Master Declarant, without interest, to the extent that the Master Association has funds in excess ofjits workiilg capital funds, reserve funds, and operating expenses to date for the calendar year in whrc`li th&A.-Control Period terminates; and provided further, however, that any of such advances wlucfi aretlot reiaz to the Master Declarant shall continue to constitute advances against AssessIrentstheno~r fliercafter du from the Master Declarant until automatic termination of the Special i tetr D -4_ 111 n Rights as provided an Section 1.24 of this Master Declaration (Special Master Declarant Rights) Ifth M ter Declarant elecfis n its discretion to pay any amounts as provided in this subject on Maser Del Clararmtt sha no~iinder any coYrcumstances, be obligated to continue payment or fundmg_gf any sixc>t am unf{s) m fhezfututq ' Section 4.5. Date of CoAA en ent of trtsO ssessritfnts ' Annual Assessments shall commenceatsnch tinie Me-, oazDirectors may determine in its discretion. After any annual Assessment has bean eh theaster Assoc on, annual Assessments shall initially not be greater than the amount set forth in SecUa 4ftt;Nlaf r Declara ` n (Initial Annual Assessment), and thereafter shall be based on a budget adoptq - elas er U crabBR as provided in this Master Declaration. A budget shall be so adopted by the Masfe? Soeiatho_i~ o less freguentlp` an annually. The annual Assessments shall be due and payable in quarterly ttishnexs, .t°wc or otr-rich other dates, and with such frequency (which may be other than quarterly, bur notless fegtr _ y that annallas the Board of Directors determines in its discretion from time to time, provided that the rst annual ssessmenhall be adjusted to reflect the time remaining in the first Master Association fiscal year. Any"owneipure_oasme ascot between installment due dates shall pay a pro rata share of the last payment due. 1 its Special Assessments. hi addiho the annual Assessments authorized in this Article, the Board of Directors may levy, in any fiscal year, with the approval of the votes of sixty-seven percent (67%) of a quorum of the Master Association votes cast by Members voting in person or by proxy at a meeting duly called for this purpose, a special Assessment applicable to that year only, for the purpose of defraying in whole or in part the cost of any construction, reconstruction, repair or replacement of a capital Improvement upon the Common Elements or any portion of real property for which the Master Association has repair and/or reconstruction obligations, including fixtures and personal property related thereto, or for repair or reconstruction of any damaged or destroyed Improvements located on said Common Elements or real property, or for the funding of any deficit of the Master Association. Any such special Assessment shall be set against each Lot in accordance with the Allocated Interests set forth in this Master Declaration, except that the rate of special Assessments against Initially Unoccupied Lots shall be set as provided in Section 4.4.1 of this Master Declaration. A meeting of the Members called for the purpose of considering the establishment of a special Assessment shall be held in conformance with Section 4.7 of this Master Declaration (Notice and Quorum for Any Special Assessments). Notwithstanding the foregoing, special Assessments levied during the 75% Control Period may not be used for the purpose of constructing capital Improvements. Section 4.7. Notice and Quorum for Any Special Assessments. Written notice of any meeting called for the purpose of taking any action authorized under Section 4.6 of this Master Declaration (Special Assessments) shall be sent to all Members not less than thirty (30) days nor more than sixty (60) days in advance of the meeting. At the first such meeting called, the presence of Members or of proxies entitled to cast sixty percent (60%) of the Master Association votes shall constitute a quorum. If the required quorum is not present, another meeting may be called subject to the same notice requirement, and the required quorum at the subsequent meeting shall be one-half (1/2) of the required quorum at the preceding meeting. No such subsequent meeting shall be held more than sixty (60) days following the preceding meeting. Section 4.8. Assessments/Charges for Services to Less Than All Lots. The Master Association may, at any time from time to time, provide services to any Subassociation or other area(s) (containing less than all of the Lot(s)) in the Community. If such services are not funded by the Master Association's annual or special Assessments, then such services shall be provided, if at all, pursi-pnt to an agreement in writing between the Master Association and such Subassociations or the Owners of the Lots;for which such service is to be provided, with such agreement to include a statement and terms for payment of the costs fees3and expenses that are to be paid by such Owners for such services, and which amounts shall include overhead expenses of the Master Association. Services which may be provided by the Master Association pursuant- o this Sec on (and which are not to be provided to all of the Lots) may include, without limitation, (a) the constnt Uon; raze oration mauagement maintenance, upkeep, repair, replacement and renovation of Intgrvements o.. operty ,mvnedb} such Subassociations e or Owner(s); (b) the provision of any services or functions to or-£ot such areaO pr or Subassociations; (c) the enforcement of the provisions of any Supplemental Declaration or any olhet: document on agce meal for;'ori behalf of, and in the name of the applicable Subassociations or Owners; (d) the p yme t of~Unes or oth aiiloiutYs for a Subassociation or Owners with funds provided by a Subassociation orBsuch Owtrer (e~ the'p roctltrement of insurance for a Subassociation or such Owners; (f) the collection of assessments for inthj namo of atid`sn`be)ralf of any Subassociation; (g) the collection of charges for use of facilities ofd SubasSOC~atlon; and (lj the a' ointment and supervision of a manager(s) for a Subassociation or area. Section 4.9. Liekforylssessmetit,~ 4 9 1 Th Maater Assoctationitas a statutory lien on a Lot for Assessments levied aga nst that Lot or the Ownerhereofuteludmg fipr fins used against the Lot's Owner (in accordance with Section 13.1 of this Iviasfer A lazaton (Enfo"rcemenines)). The teams, provisions and policies for fines, including without 1 intatto the ouri (s), dui daf sj and levying thereof, maybe established by the Board of Directors (in accordaewrtlr Section. l3, jlip~the Master Declaration (Enforcement; Fines)), at any t me from time to time, by resolution o other action°of the Board. The amount of the lien shall include all those items set forth in this Section fiomthp timsuch items become due. If an Assessment is payable in nstalhnents, each installment is a hen frofu fire t1IImefbecomes due, nclud ng the due date set by any valid Master Association acceleration of 4.9.2. Recording of this Master Declaration constitutes record notice and perfection of the lien. No further recordation of any claim of lien for Assessments is required. However, the Board of Directors or managing agent of the Master Association may prepare, and record in the county in which the applicable Lot is located, a written notice setting forth the amount of the unpaid indebtedness, the name of the Owner of the Lot, and a description of the Lot. If a lien is filed, the costs and expenses thereof shall be added to the Assessment for the Lot against which it is filed and collected as part and parcel thereof The Master Association's lien may be foreclosed in like manner as a mortgage on real estate. Section 4.10. Priority of Master Association Lien. 4.10.1. A lien under this Article is prior to all other liens and encumbrances on a Lot except: 4.10.1.1. Liens and encumbrances recorded before the recordation of the Master Declaration; 4.10.1.2. A Security interest on the Lot which has priority over all other security interests on the Lot and which was recorded before the date on which the amount(s) due to the Master Association became delinquent; and 4.10.1.3. Liens for real estate taxes and other governmental assessments or charges against the Lot. 10 4.10.2. A lien under this Section is also prior to the Security interests described in the preceding subsection 4.10.1.2 to the extent, if any, provided in CCIOA. 4.10.3. This Section does not affect the priority of mechanics' or materialmen's liens or the priority of liens for other assessments made by the Master Association. 4.10.4. The Master Association's lien on a Lot for Assessments ,§hallibe sltperior to any homestead exemption now or hereafter provided by the laws of the State of Colorado ora* ex4ption now or hereafter ' § provided by the laws of the United States. The acceptance of a deed tolaur1*1b1ect h5 tlii Master Declaration shall constitute a waiver of the homestead and any otheF_exemghon s againstsaN MasterAssociation lien. Section 4.11. Certificate of Status of The Master Association shall firmish to an Owl its designee, upon written request delivered porsonay e the Master Association's registered agent, a fatten f tc levied against such Owner's Lot. The sta: shall be request and is binding on the Master to the Owner or Security Interest-.11 certified mail, first class poswe_gV shall have no right to assezt-a 1ou tb The Master Association sha i _vet Arta, wne; s designee; tT o Aecurity Interest Holder or rhfietdma fu clapostage prepaid, return receipt to if ettn forth amyg t of unpaid Assessments currently us}e(1 thk. 71firteen (14) calendar days after receipt of the otors, and every Owner. If no statement is famished dehed personally (including delivery by telefax) or by iii ed, to the inquiring party, then the Master Association Assessments which were due as of the date of the request. nable fee for the issuance of such certificates. of Assessments; Remedies of the Master Association. Any As@ ssmentn 6 --'-i ten (10) days after the due date thereof shall bear interest from the due date at the rate of twenty'one- dreentl(21°Va er annum, or at such lesser rate as maybe set from time to time by the Board of Directors and the 3biitjofMectors may assess thereon a monthly late charge in such amount as may be determined, from time to trine, by the Board of Directors. The Master Association may bring an action at law against the Owner personally obligated ~ay the same, or foreclose the lien against such Owner's Lot. If a judgment or decree is obtained, including, with d~ tation, in a foreclosure action, such judgment or decree shall include reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the court , together with the costs of the action and interest (as provided above) and may include late charges. No Owner may be exempt from liability for payment of any Assessment by waiver of the use or enjoyment of any of the Common Elements or by abandonment of the Lot against which the Assessments are made, or because of dissatisfaction with the Master Association or its performance. This Article does not prohibit actions or suits to recover sums for which this Master Declaration creates a lien, nor does this Article prohibit the Master Association from taking a deed in lieu of foreclosure. Section 4.13. Surplus Funds. Any surplus funds of the Master Association remaining after payment of or provision for Assessments, and any prepayment of or provision for reserves, shall be retained by the Master Association and need not be paid to the Owners or credited to them to reduce their future Assessments. Section 4.14. Working Capital Fund. The Master Association shall require the first Owner (other than the Master Declarant) of any Lot who purchases that Lot from the Master Declarant to make a non-refundable contribution to the Master Association in an amount equal to Two Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($200.00) (regardless of whether or not Assessments have commenced as provided in Section 4.5 of this Master Declaration (Date of Commencement of Annual Assessments)). Said contribution shall be collected and transferred to the Master Association at the time of closing of the sale by Master Declarant of each Lot and shall, until use, be maintained for the use and benefit of the Master Association, including, without limitation, to meet expenditures or to purchase additional equipment, property or services. Such contribution to the working capital fund shall not relieve an Owner from maldng regular payments of Assessments as the same become due. Upon the sale of such Owner's Lot, an Owner shall be entitled to reimbursement at closing (in the form of a credit 11 on the closing settlement statement) from the purchaser of such Lot (but not from the Master Association) for the portion of the aforesaid contribution to working capital fund which has not been used by the Master Association at the time of conveyance of the Lot by such Owner. Section 4.15. Other Charges. The Master Association may levy and assess charges, costs and fees for following, in such reasonable amounts(s) as the Board of Directors may determinl to time, including reimbursement of charges that are made to the Master Assoc Person: copying of Master Association or other documents; return check c gi telephone calls; transfer charges or fees upon transfer of ownership of a7 ot; j other charges incurred by the Master Association for or on belialf o'€ any_~lvnei(s) Section 4.16. Chargesfor If any Master Association ex) Directors, the Master Association may Owner's Lot. 5. at not limited to, the any time from time ging agent or other faxes; long distance demand letters; and as determined by the Board of y against such Owner and such Appointment and Authority of Representative. ")5 1 1 Ttge DesrgnR: kW Committee shall consist of three (3) or more persons appointed by the Board of rectors 13rov,de iowever, that until automatic termination of the Special Master Declarant Rights as provrdd mechdr 124 this Master Declaration (Special Master Declarant Rights), the Master Declarant may appo)nt the Desrm Review Committee. The power to "appoint" the Design Review Committee, as provided fiezemn slp nclude without l m tat on the power to: constitute the in tial member(h p of the Design Review Comam~ttee; appoint member(s) to the Design Review Committee on the occurrence of any vacancy therein, fo~vhatever reason; and remove any member of the Design Review Comm ttee, with or w thout cause, at any fine, and appoint the successor thereof Each such appointment may be made for such term(s) of office, subject to the aforesaid power of removal, as may be set from time to time in the discretion of the appointor. 5.1.2. The Committee may at anytime, from time to time, appoint a representative to act on its behalf. If the Committee does so, then the actions of such representative shall be the actions of the Committee, subject to the right of appeal as provided below. However, if such a representative is appointed by the Committee, then the Committee shall have full power over such representative, including without limitation the power to at any time withdraw from such representative any of such representative's authority to act on behalf of the Committee and the power to at any time remove or replace such representative. Section 5.2. Review andApprovalby Committee, Reimbursementfor Expenses, Requirementfor Approval by Governmental Entities. Except as provided in Sections 5.13 (Variance) and 5.16 (Master Declarants Exemptions) of this Master Declaration, no Improvements shall be constructed, erected, placed, planted, applied or installed upon any Lot unless complete plans and specifications therefor (said plans and specifications to show exterior design, height, materials, color, and location of the Improvements, plotted horizontally and vertically, location and size of driveways, location, size, and type of landscaping, fencing, walls, windbreaks and grading plan, as well as such other materials and information as may be required by the Committee), shall have been first submitted to and approved by the Design Review Committee. 5.2.1. The Design Review Committee shall exercise its reasonable judgment to the end that all Improvements conform to and harmonize with the existing surroundings, residence, landscaping and structures. 12 5.2.2. In its review of such plans, specifications and other materials and information, the Design Review Committee may require that the applicant(s) reimburse the Committee for the actual expenses incurred by the Committee in the review and approval process. Such amounts, if any, shall be lev. ed in addition to the Assessment against the Lot for which the request for Design Review Committee approva was made, but shall be subject to the Master Association's lien for Assessments and subject to all other raghtssof the Master Association for the collection of such Assessments, as more fully provided in this Mq ter~eclazation. 5.2.3. In addition to the required approvals by the Design Review CbmmAgas provided in this Article, the construction, erection, addition, deletion, change or mstal}a"of any 140 q cements shall also require the applicant to obtain the approval of all goveznmental entitles wtt7llursdtctr6n=tltereover, and issuance of all required permits, licenses and approvals tiyatl su~h eiittties 1Wrthout huvfutg the generality of the preceding sentence, issuance of building pemnt(g by vile City ofAlrvada Colarad if required, shall be a precondition to commencement of any contstmcuon' a 41 te ahonAof 4d1dthonlto or cf tinge in any Improvement. Section 5.3. Delegation (~tanee)fDe'srgu Rey~~ew annd Approval. The Master Declarant during .the tmte w7i the MaseiDeclarant has the right to appoint the Design Review Committee, and the Board thereaffer may legatd 3 all design review and/or approval functions pursuant to this Master DeclartrotIo ai archtectal/destgn review committee appointed by one or more Subassociahons and rraya ceptSr Itr arc ectute)ldesign review committee appointed by one or more Subassociatrons delegtfion o~° a7levae~aa approval functions of such architectural/design review committee(s) 1`11 with the._ - htlolapp ' t the Design Review Committee may, at any time, detemaine to reclaim the delegated~hts o reclbtm e elegated rights, written notice must be given to the Board of Directors of any Subassocia onto wlti h suck- is were delegated, that such right is being reclaimed by the Master Association and t re 76--th t on shall be effective upon receipt of the notice by the Board of Directors of the Subassocration'-Vlo delegatioia of design review and/or approval to any Subassociation shall constitute a waiver of the Master Asspc ation rigli of design review and/or approval as provided in this Master Declaration. Procedures. The Design Review Committee shall decide each request for approval within forty-five (45) days after the complete submission of all plans, specifications and other materials and information which the Committee may require in conjunction therewith. If the Design Review Committee fails to decide any request within forty-five (45) days after the complete submission of all plans, specifications, materials and other information with respect thereto, then such request shall be deemed to have been denied by the Committee. Section 5.5. Design Guidelines. The Design Review Committee, with the advice of the Board of Directors, may, at any time from time to time, enact, issue, promulgate, modify, amend, repeal, re-enact, and enforce, a manual of Design Guidelines for the Community, or other design or architectural guidelines, to interpret and/or implement any provisions of this Article and the Master Declaration. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, such provisions may contain guidelines to clarify the types of designs and materials that may be considered in design approval, may state requirements for submissions in order to obtain review by the Committee, may state procedural requirements, or may specify acceptable Improvement(s) that may be installed without the prior approval of the Design Review Committee. Any architectural or design guidelines so adopted by the Committee shall be consistent, and not in conflict, with this Article and Us Master Declaration. Section 5.6. Vote and Appeal. A majority vote of the Design Review Committee is required to approve a request for approval pursuant to this Article, unless the Committee has appointed a representative to act for it, in which case the decision of such representative shall control. In the event a representative acting on behalf of the Design Review Committee decides a request for architectural approval which is adverse to the applicant, then the applicant shall have the right to an appeal of 13 such decision to the full Committee, upon a written request therefor submitted to the Committee within thirty (30) days after such decision by the Committee's representative. Section 5.7. Prosecution of Work After Approval. After approval of a request for architectural approval, the work to complete the, same --an' ll be accomplished as promptly and diligently as possible and in complete conformity with the approval. Failurd3 to_Implete the proposed Improvement within (1) year after the date of approval of the application therefor, or Yo coibplele the hnprovement in accordance with the description and materials finished to the Committee and, the=t onddros imposed with such approval, shall constitute a violation of this Article; provided, however ,that the Design Rev bW Committee, in its discretion, may grant extensions of time for completion of any-proposedTmprovements Section 5.8. Notice of Completion. Upon completion of the Improi "Notice of Completion" to the Design R Committee shall not be deemed to have and granted as provided in this Article. ('Applicant") shall give a written "such Notice of Completion, the which approval has been sought Section 5.9. Ins_pectign of-W rk. ; 3 ~ ~ The Design Review ComrniM or is duTyr authorized representative shall have the right to inspect any Improvement prior t t durtng rte; c mplelionthe same, in order to determine whether or not the proposed Improvement is l ewgtcompled ohasbeePP ompleted in compliance with this Article and any approval therefor s granted by theom ut[ee i Ilowever ,unl the Committee expressly states, in a written document that an Improvement is''bemg comjletedi liars been completed in conformance with the approval therefor, no such conformance shallbe i r r i p li d from wspection of the Improvement either during the work or after completion thereof. Notice of Noncompliance. If, as a resulfaf inspections or otherwise, the Design Review Committee finds that any Improvement has been done without obtaining the approval of the Committee, or was not done in substantial compliance with the approval that was granted pursuant to Section 5.7 (Prosecution of Work After Approval) the Committee shall notify the applicant in writing of the noncompliance; which notice shall be given ("Notice of Noncompliance"), in any event, within sixty (60) days after the Committee receives a Notice of Completion from the applicant. The notice shall specify the particulars of the noncompliance. Section 5.11. Correction of Noncompliance. If the Design Review Committee determines that a noncompliance exists, the applicant shall remedy or remove the same, and return the subject property or structure to its original condition within a period of not more that forty-five (45) days from the date of receipt of the Notice of Noncompliance. If the applicant does not comply with the Committee's ruling within such period, the Committee may, at its option and prior approval of the Board of Directors, record a Notice of Noncompliance against the property on which the noncompliance exists, may remove the non- complying Improvement or may otherwise remedy the noncompliance, and the applicant shall reimburse the Master Association, upon demand by the Board, for all costs and expenses incurred with respect thereto. Section 5.12. Records. The Design Review Committee shall maintain written records of all applications submitted to it and all actions taken by it thereon, and such records shall be available to Members for inspection at reasonable hours of the business day. Section 5.13. Variance. The Design Review Committee may grant reasonable variances or adjustments from any conditions and restrictions imposed by this Article or Article 10 of this Master Declaration (Restrictions), in order to overcome practical 14 difficulties or prevent unnecessary hardships arising by reason of the application of any such conditions and restrictions. Such variances or adjustments shall be granted only in case the granting thereof shall not be materially detrimental or injurious to the other property or Improvements in the neighborhood and shall not militate against the general intent and purpose hereof. „s Section 5.14. Waivers, No Precedent I The approval or consent of the Design Review Committee or any represeptative thereof to any application for architectural approval shall not be deemed to constitute a waiver of any right to-withhold o- deny a roval or consent by the Committee or any representative thereof as to any application or othermatters3whatsmiWas;to which approval or consent may subsequently or additionally be required Nor shall any such appTOvalpr consentbe deemed to constitute a precedent as to any other matter. a Section 5.15. Liability. The Design Review Conamm Person submitting requests for approval failure to approve or disapprove in rega. Design Review Committee shall not be. submitted for review, nor the confomian any other matters and any approval o approval of any of-the ,same-TrI~L~eni upon, rights accoded,achon9 eat by is-Aereof,shdl" be able in equity or damages to any reason of any ac ' n, failure to act, approval, disapproval, or nnllg1unsdi on hereunder. In reviewing any matter, the safety,hether structural or otherwise of the Improvements ud S codes or other governmental laws or regulations, nor b}~ e Design Review Committee shall not be deemed an shall be a third party beneficiary of any obligation imposed d by the Design Review Committee. Exemption. Notwithstdndmg al ytlnng lieiein to the contrary, until automatic termination of the Special Master Declarant Rights as provid'm-Sectiona.24 of this Master Declaration (Special Master Declarant Rights), the Master Declarant shall be e,pa- t fifm the provisions of this Article except for the requirements to obtain approval from all governmental entihesith jurisdiction thereover (as provided in Section 5.2.3 hereof). ARTICLE 6. INSURANCE Section 6.1. Insurance. The Master Association shall maintain insurance in connection with the Common Elements. The Master Association shall maintain insurance as required by applicable law or applicable regulation, including CCIOA, which insurance shall include, without limitation, property insurance, commercial general liability insurance, and fidelity coverage. In addition, the Master Association may maintain insurance against such other risks as the Board of Directors may elect from time to time, including, but not limited to, personal liability insurance to protect directors and officers of the Master Association from personal liability in relation to their duties and responsibilities in acting as directors and officers on behalf of the Master Association, and may maintain insurance on such other property and/or against such other risks as the Board of Directors may elect in its discretion from time to time. Section 6.2. Worker's Compensation Insurance. Subject to the following sentence, if the Master Association performs any work on real property or Improvements thereon, including without limitation any maintenance, repair or replacement, the Master Association shall obtain and maintain worker's compensation insurance. The Master Association need not carry worker's compensation insurance if the work performed by or on behalf of the Master Association is performed by a Person who carries worker's compensation insurance and the Master Association has obtained proof of such insurance. All policies of worker's compensation insurance shall be in conformance with state law. 15 Section 6.3. General Provisions ofInsurance Policies. Except for worker's compensation insurance which shall comply with Section 6.2 of this Master Declaration (Worker's Compensation Insurance), all policies of insurance carried by the Master Association shall comply with this Section. All policies of insurance carried by the Master Association shall be carried in blank_efpohcy form naming the Master Association as insured, or its designee as trustee and attomey-in-fact for all Owners,"" cs;ch Owner shall be an insured person under such policies with respect to liability arising out of any Owner's htembership in the Master Association. The policy or policies shall contain a standard non-contributory Security hit n. t I alder's clause in favor of each Security Interest Holder and a provision that it cannot be canceled or mateiallykaltered by either the insured or the insurance company until at least thirty (30) days' prior written notice thereof rsgtveritb the tnsired and each Security Interest Holder, insurer or guarantor of a Security Interest The. .Mastef Assoc~'fiimi'sh a certified copy or duplicate original of such policy or renewal thereof, with proof. f pre 'umi pay me `an a cer ficate identifying the interest of the Owner in question to any party in interest mcludmg)SecuntySnteresHolers, uon request. All policies of insurance carried by the Master Association shall also cbntaur wary rs bf subrog on~'Iiy the insurer against any Owner or member of such Owner's household: Turther, al cies.shall`cbntainlwaivers of any defense based on invalidity arising from any acts or Association. Section 6.4. The Master the responsibility for' that is tamed by the' of the property wltu`cI and maintenance,j an Directors Notwl)rsI either in the form of negligence of one_or- may be assessed Ati under the control of the Master mtfe-n non-discr armatory policies and procedures relating to thereof, which falls within the deductible portion of a policy ~Iatior>, ~haIIdie li~dt~re by the Person who is responsible for the repair and maintenance 3 0 ~destroy~y be apportioned among the Persons sharing in a joint duty of repair paltly"oz oily borne by the Master Association, at the election of the Board of for8go mg after notice and hearing, the Master Associat on may detemrhre that a loss, e tole paid by the Master Association or an uninsured loss, resulted from the act or is. Upon said determination by the Master Association, any such loss or portion thereof in question in such amount(s) as the Board of Directors deems appropriate. Payment of Insurance Proceeds. Any loss covered by an insurance policy described in Section 6.1 of this Master Declaration (Insurance) must be adjusted with the Master Association, but the insurance proceeds for that loss shall be payable to any insurance trustee designated for that purpose, or otherwise to the Master Association, and not to any Security Interest Holder. The insurance trustee or the Master Association shall hold any insurance proceeds in trust for the Master Association, Owners and Security Interest Holders as their interests may appear. Subject to Section 7.1 of this Master Declaration (Damage or Destruction), the proceeds must be disbursed first for the repair or restoration of the damaged property; and the Master Association, Owners and Security Interest Holders are not entitled to receive payment of any portion of the proceeds unless there is a surplus of proceeds after the property has been completely repaired or restored and any budget or reserve deficit funded, or unless the Community is terminated. Section 6.6. Master Association Insurance as Primary Coverage. If at the time of any loss under any policy which is in the name of the Master Association, there is other insurance in the name of any Owner and such Owner's policy covers the same property or loss, or any portion thereof, which is covered by such Master Association policy, such Master Association policy shall be primary insurance not contributing with any of such other insurance. Any such Owner's policy shall also contain waivers of subrogation. An Owner shall be liable to the Master Association for the amount of any diminution of insurance proceeds to the Master Association as a result of policies of insurance of an Owner. Section 6.7. Acceptable Insurance Companies. Each insurance policy purchased by the Master Association must be written by an insurance carrier which is authorized by law to do business in the State of Colorado. The Master Association shall not obtain any policy where (a) under the terms of the insurance company's charter, bylaws, or policy, contributions or assessments may be made 16 against the mortgagor or mortgagee's designee, or (b) under the terms of the carrier's charter, bylaws, or policy, loss payments are contingent upon action by the carrier's board of directors, policy holders or members, or (c) the policy includes any limiting clauses (other than insurance conditions) which could prevent mortgagees or any Owner from collecting insurance proceeds. a Section 6.8. Insurance to be Maintained by Owners. - An insurance policy issued to the Master Association does not ehmmate the need for Owners to obtain insurance for their own benefit. Insurance coverage on each Owner's Lot and the Impravements hereon, as well as on all the furnishings and personal property belonging to an Owner, and publi habttrty insurance coverage on each Lot, shall be the responsibility of the Owner of such Lot. Owners shall also bie responsible for obtainigg any policies of title insurance required in connection with any sale of a Lot other, than3he purchade by thetral Owt[er(s) from the Master Declarant. In the event the insurance policies underwritten b differentxsuietts areheld y Owners or are held by one or more Owners and the Master Association then the Owner-1halie responstlle foat such Owner's insurer agrees, in the event damage occurs to the covered&property tAacihtats payment=° the insurance proceeds of such Owner's policies such that the insurer willpa MI undisputed proceeds an°d -a -to d si puted proceeds, a fraction equal to one divided by the total number of damagedU-,ots o many diT4ted-p oceea irp to the amount of coverage provided by such insurance), subject to the right of such r recovezroxne br insurer any such sums for which the other insurer is found to be liable. r Section 6.9. 4- ~ *.4&k* oflnsyrancePolicies. All msuranee6 Wicaes r necl b the Iaslei Association shall be reviewed at least annually by the Board of Directors to as6i iii that the cove, ge_plpvided by such policies adequately covers those risks intended to be insured by the Master, Asscrahon ARTICLE 7. DAMAGE OR DESTRUCTION Damage or Destruction. 7.1.1. Any portion of the Community for which casualty insurance is required to be carried by the Master Association under this Master Declaration which is damaged or destroyed must be repaired or replaced promptly by the Master Association unless: 7.1.1.1. The Community is terminated; 7.1.1.2. Repair or replacement would be illegal under any state or local statute or ordinance governing health or safety; 7.1.1.3. The Members casting sixty-seven percent (67%) of the Master Association votes, in person or by proxy, including every Member whose residence will not be rebuilt, vote not to rebuild; or 7.1.1.4. Prior to conveyance of any Lot to a Person other than the Master Declarant, a Security Interest Holder rightfully demands all or a substantial part of the insurance proceeds; 7.1.2. The cost of repair or replacement that is covered by insurance carried by the Master Association, but which is in excess of insurance proceeds and reserves, is an Master Association expense. If the entire Community is not repaired or replaced, the insurance proceeds attributable thereto must be used to restore the damaged area to a condition compatible with the remainder of the Community and, except to the extent that other Persons will be distributees, the remainder of the proceeds must be distributed to all the Owners or penholders, as their interests may appear, in proportion to the Assessment liability of all the Lots. 17 Section 7.2. Use or Distribution oflnsurance Proceeds as to Common Elements. hi the event of damage or destruction to all or a portion of the Common Elements, due to fire or other adversity or disaster, the insurance proceeds, if sufficient to reconstruct or repair the damage, shall be applied by the Master Association to such reconstruction and repair. If the insurance proceeds with respect to such dargage or destruction are insufficient to repair and reconstruct the damaged or destroyed area(s), the Master Association shall levy a special Assessment in the aggregate amount of such insufficiency pursuant to Section 4.6 ofthus Master Declaration (Special Assessments), but without approval of the Members, and shall proceed to make,sucli repaus qr reconstruction. No distributions of insurance proceeds shall be made unless made jointly payable to the Onrers arl any Security Interest Holders of their respective Lots. The Assessment provided for herein shallbe a debt of each Owner and alien on such Owner's Lot and the Improvements thereon. Section 7.3. Use or Distribution of Except as otherwise provided in to or destruction of any structure located c "Repaired and reconstructed," as used 1 condition in which it existed immediately before. If the Owner(s) of a Lot do wnq provided above, and diligently pursue t 11- - Committee, then the Master Association-- 8.3 of this Master Declazahdn -as e- A's complete such reatr olr xecons~>r lion Declaration this Master on 7.1 of thts aster Dec garatrdn (Daiiidge of Destruction), any damage of s " ll be pzo tly leparredwapd reconstructed by the Owner(s) thereof sSeon slta Testor the structure to substantially the same Io sh damage ordestrtirhon includ ng having the same boundaries as nmerii;e repair-oar'-_rgonshuction activities within a reasonable time, as une'i confomla~uee with the plans approved by the Design Review F its rasonabYe~discretion after providing the notice required in Section aon's.Rght to Repa r, Ma retain and Reconstruct), enter upon the Lot and vlegjl is vote not to rebuild any Lot, that Lot's Allocated Interests are Lot had been condemned as provided in Section 13.14 of this Master Association shall promptly prepare, execute and record an amendment to ARTICLE 8. F.XTF.RiOR MAINTENANCE Worker's Compensation Insurance. The Master Association shall carry, or shall ensure that its contractors carry, worker's compensation insurance as provided in Section 6.2 of this Master Declaration (Worker's Compensation Insurance) at any time that the Master Association performs, or causes to be performed, maintenance, repair or replacement. Section 8.2. General. 8.2.1. Maintenance, repair or replacement of the Common Elements and all hmprovements located thereon, and of any drainage structure or facilities, or other public hmprovements required by the local governmental entity as a condition of development of the Community or any part thereof, shall be the responsibility of the Master Association, unless such Improvements have been dedicated to and accepted by the local governmental entity for the purpose of maintenance, repair or replacement or unless such maintenance, repair or replacement has been authorized by law to be performed by a special district or other municipal or quasi-municipal entity. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Master Association shall maintain and repair the Common Elements, and the Improvements thereon. Further, the Master Association may provide such other maintenance, repair and replacement as the Board of Directors deems appropriate from time to time, including without limitation publicly-dedicated property and Improvements located thereon. The costs to be expended for such maintenance and repair shall, subject to Section 8.5 of this Master Declaration (Owner's Acts or Omissions), be collected by the Master Association as Assessments as provided in Article 4 of this Master Declaration (Assessments). 8.2.2. Without limiting the generality of subsection 8.2.1 above, until such time as Tract H is developed for residential use, the Master Association shall provide maintenance, repair and replacement of the Drainage Easement located in Tract H of Skyline Estates Filing No. 1, as recorded in Book 151, Page 37 under 18 Reception Number F0988769 of the official Jefferson County, Colorado records, asset forth in Note 11 on the Final Plat of Skyline Estates Filing No. 1, amended, recorded on September 7, 2000, in Book 156, at Page 43, at Reception No. F1100835, in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Jefferson County, Colorado. 8.2.3. Without limiting the generality of subsection 8.2.1 above, the MasterAssociation shall provide maintenance, repair and replacement of the underdrain main collection lines) inAhe Community, whether such main collection line(s) are located on Lots, Common Elements 'and/orpubliely-dedicated property, provided that the Owner shall maintain the individual service lateraE ni a)naip collection line to such Owner's Lot. 8.2.4. Except as provided in subsections 8 ._i apand ove th-- amtenance, repair and replacement of each Lot, and the Improvements theregon shiAb per' one by the Own, Me thereof at such Owner's sole cost and expense. However, the foregomg3s sub' tc tl e _to, slo§is ofi~ection 8.5 of this -x .1 Master Declaration (Owner's Acts or Omissions) I -P, + 3 Section 8.3. Master hi the event any Owner manner satisfactory to the Board period after written notice to -said (30) day time period to pepf~ aj repair or reconstr echo d slialib Vi Reconstruct gain pnce, repair and/or reconstruction obligations in a oe}n may, if said failure continues for a thirty (30) day :.upon said Lot subsequent to the expiration of said thirty e, repair or reconstruction. The cost of such maintenance, Owner of the Lot on which such work is performed. of and Non-Interference with Grade and Drainage; Irrigation Slabs. 8 4 It '°Each Owner shall maintain the grading on such Owner' s Lot (including grading around the bmlduig fpundationnd the Master Association shall ma retain the grading on the Common Elements, at the slope and pitchrfix`ed by the final grad ng thereof, includ ng landscaping and ma ntenance of the slopes, so as to maintain the.e'stablished dra nage. Each Owner and the Master Association agree, for themselves and their success and assigns, that they will not in any way interfere with or obstruct the established drainage pattern over any real property which they have a duty to maintain, from adjoining or other real property. hi the event that it is necessary or desirable to change the established drainage over any Lot or Common Elements, then the party responsible for the maintenance of such real property shall submit a plan to the Design Review Committee for its review and approval, in accordance with Article 5 of this Master Declaration (Design Review Committee), and any such change shall also be made in accordance with all laws, regulations and resolutions of all applicable governmental entities. 8.4.2. The occupant of a Lot, including the Owner thereof, should not plant flower beds (especially annuals), vegetable gardens and other landscaping which requires regular watering, within five (5) feet of the foundation of the residence or any slab on the Lot. If evergreen shrubbery is located within five (5) feet of any foundation wall or slab, then the Owner of the Lot should water such shrubbery by "controlled hand-watering," and should avoid excessive watering. Further, piping and heads for sprinkler systems should not be installed within five (5) feet of foundation walls and slabs. 8.4.3. For purposes of this Section, "established drainage" is defined as the drainage which exists at the time final grading by the Master Declarant is completed. Section 8.5. Owner's Acts or Omissions. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Master Declaration, in the event that the need for maintenance, repair or reconstruction of the Common Elements, a Lot, or any Improvements located thereon, is caused by the act or omission of any Owner, or by the act or omission of any member of such Owner's family or by a tenant, guest or invitee of such Owner, the cost of such repair, maintenance, reconstruction or expense to avoid such damage 19 shall be the personal obligation of such Owner to the extent that said Owner would be liable for the acts of such Persons under the laws of the State of Colorado. A determination of the act or omission of any Owner, or any member of an Owners family or a tenant, guest or invitee of any Owner, and the amount of the Owner's liability therefor, shall be made by the Master Association at a hearing after notice to the Owner, provided that any such determination which assigns liability to any Owner pursuant to the terms of this Section may be appealed by said Owner to a Art of law. ARTICLE 9. F.ASF.MF.NTS Section 9.1. Easements. s ' s In addition to any other easements which may be granted~or reserved eli ew-here In this Aaster Declaration, the following Sections describe easements to which the Comrratti{jy is oz mayliliesablect _ 11 Section 9.2. Maintenancee4$epailr and R`e lacemlent,Vkh1 ofA dress and Easement Each Owner hereby grants to the Master Asociationiarid the other'r wnerand to their agents and employees and contractors, a right and easement on, opr aross andliiouli`sitch Owner's Lot for maintenance, repair and replacement as provided in this Master Declaration, _Includmg w ut limitation as provided in Article 8 of this Master Declaration (Exterior Maintenance) If tlam~ is inflicted, or a-*&ong likelihood exists that it will be inflicted, on the Common Elements any other proprty' an.ot, tlie_ Ownei er sponsible for the damage or expense to avoid damage, or the Master Association i£tt iss ze Ka!_§j le vs5iable for the cost of prompt repair. The rights and easements granted in this Section may be exercised,-~9nly duzin reasnabihours after reasonable notice to the Owners or occupants of any affected Lot ezcJpt thYno"such n~7hce sliaIl,tle required in connection with any exterior, non-intrusive maintenance, repair and/or i acemept .an l exco that; ii emergency situations entry upon a Lot may be made at any time provided that the Owner or oce pants of ear ffected Lot shall be warned of impending emergency entry as early as is reasonably possible. Thy ntertror of y residence shall not be subject to the easement granted in this Section. Easement forAccess to Common Elements. Each Supplemental Declaration shall provide for an easement, to all Members, for access to any Common Elements whiclare accessible from property now or hereafter owned by the Subassociation. Such easement for access shall be subject to rules and regulations of the applicable Subassociation provided that such rules and regulations shall be uniform as to all Persons who are subject thereto and may not discriminate against the Members. The Community is intended to have private streets which are intended to be owned, maintained, repaired and replaced by one or more Subassociation. Section 9.4. Common Elements, Utilities and Drainage Easement 9.4.1. Master Declarant hereby reserves a blanket easement upon, across, over and under the Common Elements for utilities and the installation, use, replacement, repair and maintenance of utilities, including, but not limited to, water, sewer, gas, telephone, electricity, computer cable, and master television antenna or cable or satellite television systems, if any. By virtue of this blanket easement it shall be expressly permissible to erect, use, and maintain the necessary facilities, equipment and appurtenances on the Common Elements and to affix, use, repair, and maintain water and sewer pipes, gas, electric, telephone, computer and television wires, cables, circuits, conduits and meters. In the event any utility or quasi-utility company famishing a service covered by the general easement created herein requests a specific easement by separate recordable document, Master Declarant reserves and is hereby given the right and authority to grant such easement upon, across, over or under any part or all of the Common Elements without conflicting with the terms hereof, provided, however, that such right and authority in the Master Declarant shall automatically cease at such time as the Special Master Declarant Rights terminate as provided in Section 1.24 of this Master Declaration (Special Master Declarant Rights), at which time said reserved right shall vest in the Master Association. The easement provided for in this Section shall in no way affect, avoid, extinguish or modify any other recorded easement(s) on the Common Elements. 20 9.4.2. In addition to the easements described in Section 9.4.1 above and those easements shown on the plat(s) of the Community, Master Declarant hereby reserves, to itself and to the Master Association, easements for drainage and drainage facilities across the five (5) rear and five (5) side feet of each Lot. No Improvements (except fencing or landscaping with the prior written approval of the Design Review Committee) shall be placed or permitted to remain on any Lot nor shall any change m `grading be pemutted to exist which may change the direction of flow or obstruct or retard the flow of water-through channels or swales within such rear and side yard drainage easements. Master Declarant reserves to itself a to the Master Association the right to enter in and upon each five foot rear and side yar d drainage easements, at any time, to construct, repair, replace or change drainage structures or to perform such grading, drainae or corrective work as Master Declarant or the Master Association may deem necessaryair deshablehn then stile discretion from time to time; provided, however, that such right and auPhonty m ihe' asteflDeellrant shall automatically cease at such time as the Special Master Declarant Rights tenr matei as ro ii Section 12 of this Master Declaration (Special Master Declarant Rights) atw ch tti ie said'reserved nghtishaU est solely in the Master Association. Section 9.5. To the extent that any Lot or COmm$n Eidments encioaclfes on any other Lot or Common Elements, a valid easement for the encroachment exists `4 Property. The iYZaster l?e~7ara~i %xeb Eserv-& °£di the use and benefit of the Annexable Area, a non-exclusive, perpetual easem anclrtglitmf ay I o er, ross and under the Common Elements for utilities and the construction, location erection mstallatian storage; s mtenance, repair, renovation, replacement and use of any utilities Improvements tlia may ion hereaft~i serve the Annexable Area or any portion thereof (herein the "Annexable Area Easement) By ya}fite of tins nneale Area Easement, the Master Declarant generally intends to provide for utilities services to those portions) oOhe Annexable Area which have not been included, from time to time, in the Community pursuant to Section 13 5of,Ks Master Declaration (Annexation; Withdrawal). Hence, the Annexable Area Easement shall be in effecf i ea& portion of the Annexable Area, from and after recording of this Master Declaration, but shall cease to be effects as to each portion of the Annexable Area at such time as both of the following have occurred with respect to such' portion of the Annexable Area: annexation of such portion of the Annexable Area to this Master Declaration pursuant to the aforesaid Section; and expiration of the Master Declarant's right to withdraw such portion of the Annexable Area from this Master Declaration. ARTICLE 10. Section 10.1. General Plan. It is the intention of the Master Declarant to establish and impose a general plan for the improvement, development, use and occupancy of the Lots. Section 10.2. Restrictions Imposed. This Community is subject to the recorded easements, licenses and other matters listed on Exhibit C, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. In addition, the Master Declarant declares that all of the Lots shall be held and shall henceforth be sold, conveyed, used, improved, occupied, owned, resided upon and hypothecated, subject to the following provisions, conditions, limitations, restrictions, agreements and covenants, as well as those contained elsewhere in this Master Declaration. Section 10.3. Residential Use. Subject to Section 13.8 of this Master Declaration (Master Declarant's Use), Lots shall be used for residential use only, including uses which are customarily incident thereto, and shall not be used at any time for business, 21 commercial or professional purposes. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, Owners may conduct business activities within their homes provided that the following conditions are satisfied: 10.3.1. The business conducted is clearly secondary to the residential use of the home and is conducted entirely within the home; 10.3.2. The existence or operation of the business is not detectable from utsn e of the home by sight, sound, smell or otherwise, or by the existence of signs indicating that a busmess is Being conducted; 4 ' 10.3.3. The business does not result in an undue volume of traffic or garlang within the Community, which determination may be made by the Board ofDirectrs in 4fis sole discretiog from time to time; 10.3.4. The business conforms to all zoAg refinize~Sagd is; f rW m mature; and 10.3.5. The business Directors from time to time on s Section 10.4. be imposed by the Board of and quality of the Community. No animals livestock buds poultry leptile's or ins ct's of any kind shall be raised, bred, kept or boarded in or on the Lots; provided, howeeF, thf the Own rs of; each Lot may keep a reasonable number of dogs, cats, or other domestic animals which are bpAa fidehoehol pets6o long as such pets are not kept for any commercial purpose and are not kept in stich mumben or m suc7lmanaer as to create a nuisance to any resident of the Lots. The Master Association shallleave, amd is hereby give `flee right and authority to: set a size or poundage limit on pets; regulate the type(s) of pets thak are ermined to bye Dept; detem»ne in its sole discretion that any dog(s), cat(s) or other household pet(s) are being-kept forlcommercial urposes or are being kept in such number or in such manner as to be unreasonable or to create a nuisance; i(etemvne that an Owner is in violation of the leash laws of the applicable jurisdiction and other applicable governmentalsla}a5', ordinances, or other provisions related to pets; or determine that an Owner is otherwise in violation of the provisions of this Section. In any of the foregoing instances, the Master Association may take such action or actions astif'deems appropriate to correct the same. An Owner's right to keep household pets shall be coupled with the responsibility to pay for any damage caused by such pets, as well as any costs incurred by the Master Association as a result of such pets. Section 10.5. Temporary Structures; Unsightly Conditions. Except as hereinafter provided, no structure of a temporary character, including, but not limited to, a house trailer, tent, shack, storage shed (except as otherwise provided in subsection 10.6.8 of this Master Declaration, or outbuilding shall be placed or erected upon any Lot; provided, however, that during the actual construction, alteration, repair or remodeling of a structure or other Improvements, necessary temporary structures for storage of materials may be erected and maintained by the person doing such work. The work of constructing, altering or remodeling any structure or other Improvements shall be prosecuted diligently from the commencement thereof until the completion thereof. Further, no unsightly conditions, structures, facilities, equipment or objects shall be so located on any Lot as to be visible from a sheet or from any other Lot. Section 10.6. Miscellaneous Improvements. 10.6.1. No advertising or signs of any character shall be erected, placed, permitted, or maintained on any Lot other than a name plate of the occupant and a street number, and except for a "For Sale," "Open House," "For Rent" or security sign(s) of not more than a total of five (5) square feet. Notwithstanding the foregoing, reasonable signs, advertising, or billboards used by the Master Declarant in connection with the sale or rental of the Lots, or otherwise in connection with development of or construction on the Lots, shall be permissible. 22 10.6.2. No wood piles or storage areas shall be so located on any Lot as to be visible from a street or from the ground level of any other Lot. 10.6.3. No types of refrigerating, cooling or heating apparatus shall be permitted on a roof. No such apparatus shall be permitted elsewhere on a Lot, except when appropriately screenefl ahdapproved by the Design Review Committee subject to any provisions of the Design Guidelines. 10.6.4. Except as may otherwise be permitted by the antennae, television antennae, or other antennae, satellite dish, c shall be placed, erected or maintained on any Lot except inside provided, however, that any such devices may be erected 3 it i or construction upon the Lots; and provided furthertov a er, t1 lltte dish) W_.li apply to those "antennae" (including certain sate Telecommunications Act of 1996 and/orregulahons;promulgat As to "antennae" (including certainsa°tellrte dishes) wkuch C-4 Act of 1996 and/or regulations pto gatedlthereunder =as arne! s e , no exterior radio device of any type mcealed from view; ant during its sales subsection shall not Iq ebyFred by the amended from time to time. :d by the Telecommunications Association shall be empowered to adopt rules and reguita ®rss governing the, typ s of- antennae" (including certain satellite dishes) that are permissible hereunder, and fo the W end perrn ffe y the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and/or regulations promulgatedtherermder, as atne ded esfabg reasonable, non-discriminatory restrictions relating to appear aned safety ,Fahoandamtenance. l 517 #'edce sha be potrrnifed except, subject to any provisions of the Design Guidelines, with the poor wn napjroval afthe e LQ~ Review Committee and except such fences as maybe constructed, mstalledr located theM`aster clarant in its development of, or construction of Improvements in, the generators, clotheslines, drying yards, or service yards, shall be constructed, ned on any Lot. _0.6.7. Dog runs shall be permitted only with the prior approval of the Design Review Committee, to any provisions of the Design Guidelines. 10.6.8. Notwithstanding Section 10.5 of this Master Declaration (Temporary Structures; Unsightly Conditions), permanent storage sheds shall be permitted but only with the prior approval of the Design Review Committee and in conformance with the Design Guidelines. Section 10.7. Vehicular Parking, Storage and Repairs. 10.7.1. No house trailer, camping trailer, boat trailer, hauling trailer, boat, or accessories thereto, truck (excluding pickup trucks that are I ton or less), self-contained motorized recreational vehicle, jet ski, or other type of recreational or commercial vehicle or equipment, may be parked or stored on the Lots, or parked or stored on any property visible from the ground level of any other Lot, unless such parking or storage is entirely within the garage area of any Lot or will be suitably screened from view by a fence in accordance with the requirements, and prior written approval of, the Design Review Committee subject to any provisions of the Design Guidelines, except that any such vehicle may be otherwise parked as a temporary expedient for loading, delivery, or emergency. This restriction, however, shall not restrict trucks or other commercial vehicles which are necessary for construction or maintenance of any portion of the Community or any Improvements located thereon. 10.7.2. No recreation vehicles or disassembled or partially disassembled vehicles of any type shall be parked, stored, maintained, or used in the front yard or driveway of any Lot, or parked or stored on any property visible from the ground level of any other Lot, but may only be stored within the fully enclosed garage of that Lot. However, recreation vehicles and motor homes may be temporarily parked for a maximum of three 23 (3) consecutive days in the driveway. Recreation vehicles shall include, but not be limited to, motor homes, pick-up trucks with camper shells, trailers, motorcycles, motorbikes, snowmobiles, jet skis, all terrain vehicles, and other apparatus intended for use on land, water, or the air, and the trailers used for their transportation. 10.7.3. Except as hereinabove provided, no abandoned or inoperable automobiles or vehicles of any kind shall be stored or parked in the Community, or parked or stored on any property vide from the ground level of any other Lot. An "abandoned or inoperable vehicle" shall be defined as any, automobile, truck, motorcycle, or other similar vehicle, which has not been driven under tts ownpnpuLSroa'or a period of forty- eight (48) hours or longer, or which does not have an operable propulsion jyste#1 lnstdlle(1 therein, or which is not then currently registered and licensed; provided however, that otberw4e perimi ed ecles parked by Owners while on vacation (for a maximum of two (2) wa8ks) orlduruig a penodnf illness'`sshall not be deemed to be abandoned. 1 3 s 10.7.4. In the event the Master-Association, deterlmrie at a1r%&le is parked or stored on any Lot in violation of subsections 10 714'10.T.2 or 10 7 ahov4e, their- a v~rittgri t otice describing said vehicle"shall be personally delivered to the ovverdhereot if such gwnet anbel~ sor b y ascertained) or shall be conspicuously placed upon the veluclc (Sf tie owner flieeof}camnSYbe reasonably ascertained), and if the vehicle is not removed wnhm a reason abl - e thereaRer s determined by the Master Association in its discretion from time to tm3e the aster ASSOCiahon s ve the right to remove the vehicle at the sole expense of the owner 3hei~f s„ ~v1 su~h~s;buta~limited to, maintenance, repair, rebuilding, dismantling kind of ~hicles, trailers or boats, may be performed or conducted in the on wit mpletely enclosed structure(s) which screen the sight and sound of the id fr m adjoining property. The foregoing restriction shall not be deemed to prevent aumotor vehicle, boat, trailer, motor-dr ven cycle, or other veh cle, together w th incident and necessary to such washing and polishing. Nuisances. No nuisance shall be permitted in the Community nor any use, activity or practice which is a source of annoyance or embarrassment to, or which offends or disturbs the resident of any Lot or which interferes with the peaceful enjoyment or possession and proper use of any Lot, or any portion thereof, by its residents. As used herein, the term "nuisance" shall include each violation of this Master Declaration, the Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws, rules and regulations, standards and/or guidelines of the Master Association or the Board of Directors, but shall not include any activities of Master Declarant which are reasonably necessary to the development and construction of, and sales activities in, the Community. No noxious or offensive activity shall be carried on in the Community nor shall anything be done or placed in the Community which is or may become a nuisance or cause embarrassment, disturbance or annoyance to others. Further, no immoral, improper, offensive or unlawful use shall be permitted in the Community or any portion thereof. All valid laws, ordinances and regulations of all governmental bodies having jurisdiction over the Community, or any portion thereof, shall be observed. Section 10.9. No Hazardous Activities, No Hazardous Materials or Chemicals. No activities shall be conducted on any Lot or within Improvements constructed on any Lot which are or might be unsafe or hazardous to any person or property. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, no firearms shall be discharged upon any Lot and no open fires shall be lighted or permitted on any Lot except in a contained barbecue unit while attended and in use for cooking purposes or within an interior fireplace, or except such campfires or picnic fires on property which may be designated for such use by the Master Association. Further, no hazardous materials or chemicals shall at any time be located, kept or stored in, on or at any Lot except such as may be contained in household products normally kept at homes for use of the residents thereof and in such limited quantities so as to not constitute a hazard or danger to person or property. 24 Section 10.10. No Annoying Light, Sounds or Odors. No light shall be emitted from any Lot which is unreasonably bright or causes unreasonable glare; no sound shall be emitted from any Lot which is unreasonably loud or annoying; and no odor shall be permitted from any Lot which is noxious or offensive to others. Any exterior lighting installed or maintained on a Lot<o:lmprovements(s) shall either be indirect or of such controlled focus and intensity so as not to disturb the rest ends If adjacent or nearby property. Section 10.11. Restrictions on Trash and Materials. No refuse, garbage, trash, lumber, grass, shrubs or debris of any kind shall be kept, stored, or allowed to accuu such items be deposited on a street unless placed in a a- garbage pickup. All equipment for the storage or dispJ& condition. No garbage or trash cans or receptacles-,s be=i dlk materials, scrap or Agny Lot nor shall any & for the purpose of r a clean and sanitary manner. Section 10.12. Lots to Each Lot shall at all times trash, litter, junk, boxes, containers except as necessary during the_ pe (Restrictions on Trash andat&rta7 some condition by the Owner of the Lot. No cry shall be permitted to remain upon any Lot in Section 10.11 of this Master Declaration The! erm' lease" asused here"° )shall include any agreement for the leasing or rental of a Lot, or any portion thereof and shall3pi iflc~i nclude, , out Ihnitation, month-to-month rentals and subleases. Any Owner shall have the right to lease s>ich OvmeX sI of any portion thereof, under the following conditions: 1All leases shall be in writing and notice of the lease, including the name of tenant(s) and the durafon f the lease, shall be delivered to the Board of Directors or the Master Association's managing agent, ny, within thirty (30) days after such lease has been signed by the lessor and the lessee; and 10.13.2. All leases shall provide that the terms of the lease and lessee's occupancy of the leased premises shall be subject in all respects to the provisions of this Master Declaration, and the Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws and rules and regulations of the Master Association; and that any failure by the lessee to comply with any of the aforesaid documents, in any respect, shall be a default under the lease. Section 10.14. Landscaping. Within the time frame hereinafter provided, the Owner (other than Master Declarant) of each Lot shall install landscaping on all unlandscaped portions of such Lot which are not covered by a building or other Improvements in accordance with the applicable landscaping plan for the Community and the applicable Design Guidelines. The Owner, or Subassociation (if provided for in a Supplemental Declaration), shall thereafter maintain all landscaping on such Owner's Lot in a neat and attractive condition, including periodic and horticulturally correct pruning, removal of weeds, and replacement of landscaping. The Owner of each Lot (other than Master Declarant) shall completely landscape such Lot as aforesaid, within twelve (12) months after conveyance of such Lot to the first Owner thereof (other than the Master Declarant). Landscaping plans and other required documents shall be professionally done, must meet the applicable zoning guidelines regarding landscaping, shall be in accordance with this Master Declaration and the applicable Design Guidelines, and shall be submitted to the Design Review Committee for review and approval, and such approval shall be obtained prior to the installation of any landscaping by or for such Owner. If any Owner fails or refuses to install or maintain landscaping, as hereinabove provided, then the Master Association may, at the direction of the Board of Directors, enter upon such Lot and install or maintain landscaping on such Lot and the Owner thereof shall be obligated to pay for the same, in accordance with and subject to the provisions of Section 8.3 of this Master Declaration (Master Association's Right to Maintain, Repair and Reconstruct). 25 ARTICLE 11. Section 11.1. Owners'Easements of Enjoyment Subject to this Article, every Owner shall have a non-exclusive right and easement or tl~e purpose of access to their Lots and for use for all other purposes, in and to the Common Elements, and such elasement hall be appurtenant to and shall pass with the title to every Lot. t: _1 Section 11.2. Extent of Owners'Easements. Subject to the other provisions of this Article the rights hd ease'mehls of errjoySnent created hereby are subject to the following: the Common Elements may not be used iiaffymannerwhich vaoiates.the statu4es, roles, or regulations y 11 place any structure on of any governmental authority with jurisdiction over the Cottiinom ements 'and no,Ow er the Common Elements. In addition, such rights'.and eamhe s are sub- to9 followng rights of the Master Association: I i 11.2.1. The right of theMas. ter Assoc1 6 to bo ow- oney for any purpose and to mortgage said property as security for any suck joanr provided howevei rat the Master Association may not subject any portion of the Common Elements to at~ecutty Intermit kept in accordance with CCIOA; and ll 2 2 i'-bf the Ma-tet A~spbciation to take such steps as are reasonably necessary to protect the CommoniTemeiii lea tstfozeclosure~'"and Master Association to enact, issue, promulgate, amend, repeal, re-enact and and regulations, with which each Member shall strictly comply; and 1 1. Tht right of the Master Association to suspend the voting rights of a Member for any period during wh eli, - Assessment against such Member's Lot remains unpaid and, for a period not to exceed sixty (60) days, £or any infraction of the Master Association Bylaws or the rules and regulations of the Master and 11.2.$. The right of the Master Association to dedicate or transfer all or any part of the Common Elements owned by the Master Association to any public agency, authority, or utility for such purposes and subject to such conditions as may be agreed to by the Members, provided that no such dedication or transfer shall be effective unless the same is done in accordance with CCIOA. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the granting of permits, licenses and easements for public utilities, roads or for other purposes reasonably necessary or useful for the proper maintenance or operation of the Community shall not be deemed a transfer within the meaning of this subsection; and 11.2.6. The right of the Master Association, through its Board of Directors, to enter into, make, perform or enforce any contracts, leases, agreements, licenses, easements and rights-of-way, for the use of real property or Improvements by Owners, other Persons, their family members, guests and invitees, for any purpose(s) the Board of Directors may deem to be useful, beneficial or otherwise appropriate; and 11.2.7. The right of the Master Association to close or limit the use of the Common Elements while maintaining, repairing and making replacements in the Common Elements. Section 11.3. Use of Common Elements by Master Declarant An easement is hereby reserved by the Master Declarant on, over, under and through the Common Elements as may be reasonably necessary for the purpose of discharging any of Master Declarant's obligations or exercising any Special Master Declarant Rights or other rights of the Master Declarant, and no Owner shall engage in any 26 activity which will temporarily or permanently interfere with the Master Declarants easements through the Common Elements. Section 11.4. Delegation of Use. Any Owner may delegate the right of enjoyment to the Common Elements and facilities, the members of such Owner's family, tenants, or contract purchasers who reside on such Owner's Lot. ' z Section 11.5. Payment of Taxes or Insurance by Security Security Interest Holders shall have the right, j which are in default and which may or have become premiums on hazard insurance policies or secure new Common Elements, and any Security Interest Hold( reimbursement therefor from the Master Association. Section 11.6. Portions of the Common Association only in accordance with 'arges or Assessments rd may pay overdue e of a policy for the be owed immediate to a Security Interest by the Master Section-11.7., ItDe,~~st-g'naCtlon o Commim Elements. Master'Dec]arant me=orng3lus asfDeclaration has designated certain areas of land as Common Elements mtende~for or,. e common tGSe anal e~riap ent of Owners for recreation and other related activities, as provided in this Master Der ammtaon an other apgli 81e documents. The Common Elements owned by the Master Association is not dedicated heieyfor use by thej erl public. Duty to Accept Property and Facilities Transferred by Master Declarant The Master Association shall accept title to any Common Elements, including Improvements thereon, as well as personal proper 'equipment, and easements, transferred to the Master Association by the Master Declarant, together with responsibility to perform all duties and functions of the Master Association which are set forth in this Master Declaration or otherwise assumed by the Master Association. As of the date of recording of this Master Declaration, interests which are planned to be transferred by the Master Declarant to the Master Association are planned to consist only of fee simple title to Common Elements to be located in the property described on the attached Exhibit A and/or the Annexable Area and/or easements. ARTICLE 12. DISPUTF RESOLUTION Section 12.1. Intent of Article; Applicability of Article; and Applicability of Statutes of Limitation. 12.1.1. Each Parry (as defined below) agrees to encourage the amicable resolution of disputes, without the emotional and financial costs of litigation. Accordingly, each Party covenants and agrees to submit all Claims (as defined below) each alleges to have to the procedures set forth in this Article and not to a court of law. 12.1.2. By acceptance of a deed for a Lot, each Owner agrees to abide by the temis of this Article. 12.1.3. No Claim (as defined below) may be initiated after the date when institution of legal or equitable proceedings based on such Claim would be barred by the applicable statute of limitation or statute of repose. Section 12.2. Definitions Applicable to this Article. For purposes of this Article only, the following terms have the meanings set forth in this Section: 27 12.2. 1. "AAA" means the American Arbitration Master Association. 12.2.2. "Claimant" means any Party having a Claim. 12.2.3. "Claim" means, except as excluded or exempted by the terms of this Article, any claim, grievance or dispute between one Party and another, regardless of how the same;may have arisen or on what it might be based, including without limitation those arising out of or related to (,the interpretation, application or enforcement of any of the Governing Documents or the rights, obliganons and duties off' an y Party under an y of the Governing Documents; ii the design or construction of t• gn Improvements, (xi)any statements, representations, promises, warranties, or other communications made by ononb6half of aiay Party. 3 t 12.2.4. "Governing Documents" means tYM ster Ileelarahon 4he Articles of Incorporation of the Master Association, the Bylaws of the Master Assocrationltarid aliny_zuleS andre:_~ € at or design guidelines adopted by the Board of Directors. 3 } 12.2.5. "Inspecting Party mean Patty c usmg;anm`sp on the Subject Property to be made. 12.2.6. "Party" means each oftli following: Ma evDe 1 ant, its officers, directors, partners, members, employees and agents; YheastergAssoerahoi%}t officers, directors and committee members; all Persons subject to this Masterhec4Qfi n any bulk officers, directors, partners, members, employees and agents; and any Pen; of not'4theze se soli ect to Hs7s Master Declaration who agrees to submit to this Article 1 s = A 6_12 - 1 $1 17 " esp d ne any Party against whom a Claimant asserts a Claim 12 2` 8 "SSiblectProp` means the property being inspected pursuant to the inspection right providedain Se)ytton '2 7 of t}iifaster Declaration (Right to Inspect). ?..1 L L "Termination of Mediation" means a period of time expring thirty (30) days after a mediator has been agieed'uptin'by the parties (however, a mediator shall be selected no later than forty-five (45) days after the Clain7ant has given notice to the Respondent of the Cla m and if the part es are unable to agree on a mediator9fe shall be chosen by the AAA) and the matter has been submitted to mediation (or within such other t fY a as detemuned by the mediator or agreed to by the Cla mant and Respondent) and upon the expiration of which the Claimant and Respondent have not settled the Claim Section 12.3. Approval Required for Master Association Actions. Except as provided in Section 12.6 of this Master Declaration (Exclusions from "Claim"), the approval of seventy-five percent (75%) of a quorum (as provided in Section 12.4 of this Master Declaration (Notice and Quorum for Master Association Actions)) of the Master Association votes cast by Members voting in person or by proxy at a meeting duly called for this purpose, or voting pursuant to written ballot, must be obtained before the Master Association shall have the power to institute action on any Claim pursuant to this Article, or to make any counterclaim or cross-claim in any lawsuit or other action brought against the Master Association. Such approval must be obtained in accordance with the requirements of Section 12.4 of this Master Declaration (Notice and Quorum for Master Association Actions). Section 12.4. Notice and Quorum for Master Association Actions. Written notice of any meeting of Members which includes a vote pursuant to Section 12.3 of this Master Declaration (Approval Required for Master Association Actions) shall be sent to all Members not less than thirty (30) days nor more than fifty (50) days in advance of the meeting. Such written notice, or if the vote is to be by written ballot then such written ballot, shall include the following information: 12.4.1. A statement regarding the nature of the Claim Such statement shall include, without limitation, the name(s) of the proposed Respondent(s), the basis and reason for the Claim, and any other information necessary to adequately explain the nature of the proposed Claim; and 28 12.4.2. A good-faith estimate of the costs and fees, including the fees of consultants, expert witnesses and attorneys, reasonably anticipated to be incurred by or for the Master Association in prosecuting the Claim, with such estimate prepared by the primary attorney the Board proposes to have prosecute the Claim on its behalf, and $ 12.4.3. A statement advising Members that the costs and fees of proseeutng any Claim may substantially increase the amount of assessments payable by the Owners to t1ke=I3fast Association; and 12.4.4. A good-faith estimate of the manner in which any moneys4e4badbly nticipated to be recovered from the Claim will be distributed or paid to consultants, gxpegya, aj nesses3, the Master Association, its attomey(s) and any others, prepared by the primary attorney8te Boardproposes to aw prosecute the Claim on its behalf; and 12.4.5. A good faith estimate of the pzole ted time ' fpm zesoluti of tie Claim and 12.4.6. All terms and provtsron of the agt ement ` e en the ster Association and the attorney(s) the Board proposes to haeprosucute the Clauns F The presence of Members or of proxreF'st, or t by ballo the ece pt by the Master Association of written ballots, entitled to cast sixty-sevenpezcerts(67"~0) of of thel4last" L Association votes, shall constitute a quorum at any meeting at which the Members vqC approval of- Cla aster r Association wishes to bring. Section M5 Rkquered~Eor#ofPr` or Ballot. Each wi en-pm5c_'Tand each b4 lqch purports to vote on, or authorize a vote on, approval of the Master AssoemahQn bzs?lgmg a Claun sha main the following statement: ictWt my annual assessments may be significantly increased by fees associated with the proposed claim, Uwe APPROVE the ie Master Association to bring such claim. Exclusions from "Clain'. Unless specifically exempted by this Article, all Claims between any of the Parties shall be subject to the provisions of this Article. Notwithstanding the foregoing, unless all Parties thereto otherwise agree, "Claim" does not include the following, whether such are brought by lawsuit, counterclaim or cross-claim and the same shall not be subject to the provisions of this Article: 12.6.1. An action by the Master Association to enforce any provision of Article 4 of this Master Declaration (Assessments); and 12.6.2. An action by the Master Association to obtain a temporary restraining order or injunction (or equivalent emergency equitable relief) and such other ancillary relief as the court may deem necessary in order to enforce any of the provisions of Article 10 of this Master Declaration (Restrictions) or of Article 5 of this Master Declaration (Design Review Committee); and 12.6.3. any suit between or among Owners, which does not include Master Declarant or the Master Association as a party, if such suit asserts a Claim which would constitute a cause of action independent of the Governing Documents; and 12.6.4. any suit in which any indispensable party is not a Party. Section 12.7. Right to Inspect. Prior to any Party commencing any proceeding to which another Party is a party, including but not limited to an alleged defect of any Improvement, the Respondent shall have the right to be heard by the Claimant and, if any Claimant is the Master Association, by the Members, and to access, inspect, correct the condition of, or redesign any 29 portion of any Improvement as to which a defect is alleged or otherwise correct the alleged dispute; provided, however, any correction to, or redesign of, an Improvement shall be made upon terms and conditions acceptable to all affected Parties. In the exercise of the inspection rights contained herein, the Inspecting Party shall: 12.7.1. Be careful to avoid unreasonable intrusion upon, or harm, damage or oasts to the affected Party including, without limitation, using its best efforts to avoid causing any damage to, nr interference with, any Improvements to the Subject Property; t 12.7.2. Minimize any disruption or inconvenience to any perso n-whmoccupres;(the Subject Property; 12.7.3. Remove daily all debris caused by the inspection find looatedbri the Subject Property; and t 12.7.4. In a reasonable and timely manner atSe solo cost and e%%~PPens of the-pecting Party, ~asq promptly remove all equipment and materials from c Sub ecL&o -e an drepatr anAplace all damage, and restore the Subject Property to the condition of the Sdb~ is Prop y a of the daf~e of the inspection unless the Subject Property is to be immediatelytrepa><red 4 $ The Inspecting Party shall not perrmt any en claun of other e iTrnbrance arising from the exercise of its right to inspect to accrue against or attach to to Suject Properly fhe Inspecting Party shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the affected Owners and'tlfeu fenanfs, guests, a t oyees and agents, against any and all liability, claims, demands, losses, costs, and darriages rncumgcf mcludm court costs and attorneys' fees, resulting from any breach of this Section by the`Lnsuedtirn -arty U 2 '811-- Good Faith Negotiations. The Parties shall make every reasonable effort to meet in person and ncofer K' _4 e putposes osresolving the Claim by good faith negotiation. Any Party may be represented by attomeysnd uidepegden consultants to assist such Party in negotiations and to attend meetings. Prior to proceeding with any claim against a Respondent, each Claimant shall give a which notice shall state plainly and concisely: 12.8.2.1. the nature of the Claim, including all persons involved and Respondent's role in the Claim, 12.8.2.2. the legal or contractual basis of the Claim (i.e., the specific authority out of which the Claim arises); and 12.8.2.3. the specific relief and/or proposed remedy sought. 12.8.3. Mediation. 12.8.3.1. If the Parties do not resolve the Claim through negotiations within thirty days after submission of the Claim to the Respondent(s), Claimant shall have an additional thirty (30) days to submit the Claim to mediation under the auspices of the AAA in accordance with the AAA's Commercial or Construction Industry Mediation Rules, as appropriate. 12.8.3.2. If Claimant does not submit the Claim to mediation within such time, or does not appear for the mediation, Claimant shall be deemed to have waived the Claim, and Respondent shall be released and discharged from any and all liability to Claimant on account of such Claim; provided, nothing herein shall release or discharge Respondent from any liability to any person other than the Claimant. 12.8.3.3. Any settlement of the Claim through mediation shall be documented in writing by the mediator and signed by the Parties. If a Termination of Mediation occurs, the mediator shall issue a notice of Termination of Mediation. The Termination of Mediation notice shall set forth that the Parties are at an impasse and the date that mediation was terminated. 30 12.8.3.4. Each Party shall bear its own costs of the mediation, including attorneys' fees, and each Parry shall share equally all charges rendered by the mediator. 12.8.3.5. If the Parties agree to a resolution of any Claim through negotiation or mediation in accordance with Section 12.8.3 and any Parry thereafter fails to-abide by the terms of such agreement, then any other Party may file suit or initiate arbitration ptIceedings to enforce such agreement without the need to again comply with the procedures set fgrth Seapon 12.8 of this Master Declaration (Mandatory Procedures). In such event the Party:'Jalang aetion to enforce the agreement shall be entitled to recover from the non complymgPatty (ar tfrr)ore` one non- complying Party, from all such Parties pro rata) all costs inc4 iftiin enforcmng s ch agreement including without limitation, attomeys' fees and courtcosts '?a 12.8.4. Binding Arbitration x 12.8.4.1. Upon Ter unation o Me prtronl if-, G unati'&sires to pursue the Claim, Claimant shall thereafter be entttlec to untta e fma( binding arbztr on of the Claim under the auspices of the AAA in ac ordane°e wtth the AAA's Whim` cial~or Construction Industry Arbitration Rules, as appropriate. Any gmtnt upon the'aws3rd YSmered by the arbitrator may be entered in and enforced by any courtha3nnjur>sicti onaver su Clair. Unless otherwise mutually agreed to by the parties to the Claret there slmall a one atbi for who, to the extent feasible, shall have expertise in the area(s) U dmffluta whrcih nayv3clude legal expertise if legal issues are involved. A :Each Aari~'sfiO bear its own costs and expenses and an equal share of the aditntsiratrve ees of arbitration. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a Party contests thd0 alidity or scope of arbitration in a court of law, the arbitrator or the court sonabl aLomeys' fees and expenses incurred in defending such contests, including mgel or on appeal, to the non-contesting Party. All decisions respecting the any Claim shall be decided by the arbitrator. .1 2.8.4.3. The award of the arbitrator shall be accompanied by detailed written findings offact and conclusions of law. Except as may be required by law or for confirmation of an award, ifeither a party nor an arbitrator may disclose the existence, content, or results of any arbitration without the prior written consent of all parties to the Claim Section 12.9. Liabilityfor Failure of Master Association to Maintain an Action. No director or officer of the Master Association shall be liable to any person for failure to institute or maintain or bring to conclusion a cause of action, mediation or arbitration for a Claim if the following criteria are satisfied: (i) the director or officer was acting within the scope of such director or officer's duties; (ii) the director or officer was acting in good faith; and (iii) the act or omission was not willful, wanton or grossly negligent. Section 12.10. Severabiliry. All provisions of this Article are severable. Invalidation of any of the provisions of this Article, by judgment, court order or otherwise, shall in no way affect or limit any other provisions of this Article which shall remain in full force and effect. Section 12.11. Amendment Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Master Declaration, this Article 12 shall not be amended unless such amendment is approved by Members to which at least eighty percent (80%) of the votes in the Master Association are allocated. 31 ARTICLE 13. Section 13.1. Enforcement; Fines. I 13.1.1. Enforcement of the covenants, conditions, restrictions, easeme* reservations, rights-of- way, liens, charges and other provisions contained in this Master Declaration, the Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws or rules and regulations of the Master Association as amended may bevy ar~ypxbceeding at law or in equity against any Person(s) violating or attempting to violate any suchprovrslon Except'as otherwise provided in this Master Declaration, the Master Association and any ~aggneved Owner slfall have the right to institute, maintain and prosecute any such proceed) "s"ubject to~Aihcle 1-! of Hits Maste Declaration (Dispute Resolution). For each claim, including, but not htnrte to, couutcrglarrxrs, cross o]anns ar third-party claims, in any proceeding to enforce the provisions of CCIQA r 46M aste3eclarptioi Axdjes of Incorporation, Bylaws or rules and regulations of the Master Association the courtshall ward o the party prevailing on such claim the prevailing party's reasonable collection cos and attombyfecs'and'costs incurred in asserting or defending the claim. Failure by the lMfaster ssocrahdn or a 7y Owuue to.- rce any covenant, restriction or other provision herein contained, ora o $ r provrsrotn; of anyp aforesaid documents, shall in no event be deemed a waiver of the right to do so rtieteafter. 13.1.2. SulIect ~{o the fo7loivrng sentence`,te Master Association shall have the right to levy and t collect flues, (as pxovrc~ed m Ariele 4 f this faster Declaration (Assessments)) for the violation of any provision of anpypf to afo enrior to collection of any fines, the Master Association, the Board of Directors or an au o ge ent company of the Master Association, shall mail a notice of violation to thePerson(s~ alleed toble m_ tol~tlon of any such provision and such notified Person(s) has a right to a hearing il~pon s~rbmissron to tbe~oazd of Directors of a written request for hearing, which is properly signed by such Pez3on(s)'~rrd d~tedrw~i' i'ni ten (10) days after the notice of violation has been mailed or such other time as the ]3tiard of~uectors may decide in its discretion from time to time; failure of a notified Person to request for hearing m wtitigg within the required time period shall constitute a waiver of such right to a hearing. Severability. All provisions of this Master Declaration, the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Master Association, are severable. Invalidation of any of the provisions of any such documents, by judgment, court order or otherwise, shall in no way affect or limit any other provisions which shall remain in full force and effect. Section 13.3. Conflict of Provisions. In case of any conflict between this Master Declaration and the Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws of the Master Association, this Master Declaration shall control. In case of any conflict between the Articles of Incorporation and the Bylaws of the Master Association, the Articles of Incorporation shall control. Section 13.4. Conflict with CCIQA. In the event that any of the terms or provisions of this Master Declaration are in conflict or inconsistent with CCIOA, the terms or provisions of CCIOA shall control and govern. In case of any such conflict or inconsistency, the applicable terms and provisions contained in this Master Declaration shall, to the extent possible, be construed in accordance with CCIQA, and any conflict with or violation of CCIOA by any terms or provisions of this Master Declaration shall not affect, void, or render unenforceable any other term or provision of this Master Declaration (which shall be in full force and effect in accordance with their terms.). Section 13.5. Annexation; WithdrawaL 13.5.1. Additional property may be annexed to this Master Declaration with the consent, at the time such annexation is to be effective, of Members casting sixty-seven percent (67%) of the Master Association 32 votes and with the consent, at the time such annexation is to be effective, of the owner of the property to be annexed. 13.5.2. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Master Declarant may annex to this Master Declaration the Annexable Area or any portion(s) thereof, until termination of this right as provided below, without consent of any other Owners, Security Interest Holders, or any other Person. The Master Aig-a is right to annex the Annexable Area without approval shall terminate automatically at the time oftenutnation of the Special Master Declarant Rights as provided in Section 1.24 of this Master Declaration Lggi j -idl Ib8ster beclarant Rights). Each such annexation shall be effected, if at all, by recording an Annexahon.ofAddttiandi Land and/or Supplemental Declaration in the County where the annexed pmper(y, lslonafed .;vvhrcYr document: 13.5.2.1. shall provide described in such Annexation of Ad 13.5.2.2. shalllst~at the stex Decla4i, (-r otke Person(s)) is the owner of the Lots thereby created, if an - y a 13.5.2.3.-' hallsstg>antdentifygguumber to each new Lot if any; and Common Elements within the property being annexed; property includes one (1) or more Lots, reallocate the € - 13j 5 2 ' may include such other provisions as the Master Declarant deems appropriate. jOtheiprovisions that may be included in an Annexation of Additional Land and/or Supplemental Declaratioii>include, without limitation, covenants, conditions, restrictions, requirements and/or other provisions that apply or will apply to some or all of the property that is thereby being annexed to this Maser Declaration. Any of such other provisions referenced in the preceding sentence may be amended with the consent of the Owners of sixty-seven percent (67%) of the Lots to which such other provisions apply. 13.5.3. Except as otherwise specifically stated in the Annexation of Additional Land and/or Supplemental Declaration, all provisions of this Master Declaration, including without limitation (as to Lots) those provisions regarding obligations to pay Assessments to the Master Association and any right to cast votes as Members, shall apply to annexed property immediately upon the effective date of the Annexation of Additional Land and/or Supplemental Declaration (which shall constitute the date of recording of the Annexation of Additional Land and/or Supplemental Declaration unless otherwise stated therein). 13.5.4. Subsequent to the date of recording hereof, each Person who purchases any portion of the property described on the attached Fxhihit n ("Parcel"), will have agreed pursuant to applicable documents that such Parcel will be governed by this Master Declaration. The Master Declarant, therefore, reserves the right (but not the obligation) during the time period set forth in Section 1.24 of this Master Declaration (Special Master Declarant Rights) to annex the Parcel to the Master Declaration without to ther authorization from the Person who has purchased such Parcel, even if such annexation occurs subsequent to conveyance of the Parcel by Master Declarant. 13.5.5. The property which is described on the attached Exhibit A and each portion of the Community which is annexed to this Master Declaration by the Master Declarant shall be subject to a right of withdrawal by the Master Declarant. Such withdrawal may be accomplished, if at all, in accordance with CCIOA. However, the Master Declarants right to withdraw each such portion of the Community shall expire and terminate, as to each portion of the Community, upon the first conveyance of any Lot in such portion of the 33 Community to any Person other than the Master Declarant, but in any event, no later than the automatic termination provided in Section 1.24 of this Master Declaration (Special Master Declarant Rights). Section 13.6. Minor Violations of Setback Restrictions. If upon the erection of any structure, it is disclosed by survey that a minor violation ornfringement of setback lines has occurred, such violation or infringement shall be deemed waived by the Owners of each Lot immediately adjoining the Lot on which is located the structure which is in viola tronrofthe setback, and such waiver shall be binding upon all other Owners. However, nothing contained in this Sectrrm sliall l r;11 It the prosecution of a suit for any other violation of the restrictions, covenants, or other provisions co7itamed mYhis~vlaster Declaration. A "minor violation," for the purpose of this Section, is a violatior of not more thaufot r4(4) feet meyond the required setback lines or Lot lines. This provision shall apply only to th e ongrnl'stnlcture_ss and shall iiok be applicable to any alterations or repairs to, or replacements of, any of such struCturea Section 13.7. Subdivision or Repjalttini'af, ots a I The Master Declarant hereby rese w a nght ta. sub rvide o any any Lot(s) owned by the Master Declarant in the Community. Without limrfm.the g nerahty otthe-fioregoifig, the Master Declarant reserves the right to move any Lot l ne(s) on Lot(s) owned by=_the~vlaster?Declamantforre purpose of accommodating Improvements which are constructed or are to be constructed, pii ded that such_Lot, lure adjustments, if any, shall not change the number of Lots in the Community at the tmme each sych Lot hne`_2djustmetis approved by the applicable governmental entity. The rights provided for m .this Section s~a111 fgrnunate "autoflmatically as provided in Section 1.24 of this Master Declaration (Special Master Declarant Rigts~~No tma bGfiiither subdivided from that existing at the time such Lot becomes subject to this Master A claza)ion a (cept' y lyf ter Declarant. Section 118. ` ' Masteclarant's Use. Notwithstanding anytjming to the contrary contained in this Master Declaration, it shall be expressly pemussible and proper for Master Declarant, its employees, agents, and contractors, to perform such reasonable activities, and to maintain upon portions "of'the Lots and the Common Elements such facilities as Master Declarant deems reasonably necessary or incident teal to the construction and sale of Lots, and development and construction of Improvements, specifically including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, locating, maintaining and relocating management offices, signs, model units and sales offices, in such numbers, of such sizes, and at such locations as it determines in its discretion from time to time. Further, nothing contained in this Master Declaration shall limit the rights of Master Declarant or require the Master Declarant to obtain approvals: (a) to excavate, cut, fill or grade any property (with the consent of the Owner thereof) or to construct, alter, demolish or replace any Improvements; (b) to use any Improvements on any property (with the consent of the Owner thereof) as a construction, management, model home or sales or leasing office in connection with the development, construction or sale of any property; and/or (c) to require Master Declarant to seek or obtain Design Review Committee approval or any other approvals under this Master Declaration for any such activity. Any real estate used as a sales office, management office, or a model, shall be a Lot. Section 13.9. Duration, Revocation, and Amendment. 13.9.1. Each and every provision of this Master Declaration shall ran with and bind the land for a term of twenty (20) years from the date of recording of this Master Declaration, after which time this Master Declaration shall be automatically extended for successive periods of ten (10) years each. Except as otherwise provided in this Master Declaration (including, without limitation, Sections 12.11 (Amendment), Sections 13.9.2, 13.9.4, and 13.9.5 of this Master Declaration)„ this Master Declaration may be amended during the first twenty (20) year period, and during subsequent extensions thereof, by a vote or agreement of Owners who own more than sixty-seven percent (67%) of the Lots. 13.9.2. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Master Declaration, while Master Declarant owns any portion of the property described on the attached Exhibits A and D, no amendment may be made to this Master Declaration except with the affirmative vote or agreement of Members holding ninety percent (90%) of the Allocated Interests. 34 13.9.3. Every amendment, if any, to the Master Declaration must be done in compliance with CCIOA. 13.9.4. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Master Declaration, the Master Declaration maybe amended in whole or in part, at anytime from time to time, by- h Master Declarant without the consent or approval of any other Owner, any Security Interest Holder or'anykher Person, in order to comply with the requirements, standards, or guidelines of any of the AgencreS or of reftnized secondary mortgage markets. Such right of amendment shall terminate automahca pasprovtd6ain ection 1.24 of this Master Declaration (Special Master Declarant Rights).:.;, 13.9.5. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary cons med m th e Mauer De aration, this Master Declaration, may be amended in whole or in park at ane from tmre to tmie,.l y=~, U aster aster Declarant without the consent or approval of any other Owner auy Secun~j InterestlI "lees or any other Person, in order to correct clerical, typographical, or chnical errors:uchg)ik df am'en t shall terminate automatically as provided in Section 1.24 of this Ma~er Der arahon (Spegca~ Master~ecz Rights). 13.9.6. Except as-to amen ntslwhich iuaylie made by the Master Declarant, amendments to the Master Declaration may be prepared, xeeut'pd, record~daand certified by any officer of the Master Association designated for that ph'pos~or the abseriea. of designation, by the president of the Master Association. Such certification shall, r`1 r the c eAf amndmei requiring the approval of Owners, certify that the Master Associationh s receded a req_ is, approvals. Amendments to this Master Declaration which may be made by the IYastereckuantpuuan to t }h 's Master Declaration or as permitted by CCIOA, may be signed by the Masteri2e6 kuant and shallrequir no other signatory. of Mailing Address. Each Owner and;';each Security Interest Holder, insurer or guarantor of a Security Interest, shall register his/her/its mailing addrg"ss with the Master Association, and except for annual statements and other routine notices, all other notices or derndids intended to be served upon an Owner, or upon a Security Interest Holder, insurer or guarantor of a Security Interest, shall be sent by either registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, addressed in the name of such Person at such registered mailing address. However, if any Owner fails to notify the Master Association of a registered address, then any notice or demand may be delivered or sent, as aforesaid, to such Owner at the address of such Owner's Lot. All notices, demands, or other notices intended to be served upon the Board of Directors or the Master Association during the 75% Control Period shall be sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, c/o Melody Homes, Inc., 11031 Sheridan Blvd., Westminster, Colorado 80020, unless such address is changed by the Master Association during the 75% Control Period; subsequent to termination of the 75% Control Period, the Master Association shall notify the Owners of a different address for notices. Section 13.11. HUD or VA Approval. During the 75% Control Period, the following actions shall require the prior approval of HUD or VA if, at the time any such action is taken, HUD has insurance or VA has a guarantee(s) on one or more Security Interests and HUD or VA require such approval: amendment of this Master Declaration (except as provided in Sections 13.5, 13.9.3 and 13.9.4 of this Master Declaration); termination of this Community; or merger or consolidation of the Master Association (except as provided in Section 3.12 (Merger). Section 13.12. Termination of Community. The Community may be terminated only in accordance with CCIOA. 35 Section 13.13. Transfer of Special Master Declarant Rights. A Special Master Declarant Right created or reserved under this Master Declaration may be transferred only by an instrument evidencing the transfer recorded in every county in which any portion of the Community is located, and in accordance with CCIOA. Section 13.14. Eminent Domain. The taking by eminent domain of a Lot(s) or Common Element(s) or any p xtiori the-eof, shall be done in accordance with applicable law, including without limitation CCIOA. Section 13.15. Limitation on Liability. The Master Association, the Board of D officers, directors, members, partners, agents and or for any failure to act unless the action or faihre Section 13.16. No No representations, given or made by Master De by any of their officers, 4 Community, or any broc+ compliance with apphle.l. writing. tee,- tlrester Declarant, and the idle to any Person for any action done or withheld with malice. of any kin # express or implied, shall be deemed to have been ahon, thin card of Directors, the Design Review Cotmnittee, or agents or employees, in connection with any portion of the 1 condition, structural integrity, freedom from defects, zoning, e, or view, or in connection with the subdivision, sale, operation, thereof, unless and except as shall be specifically set forth in Regarding Safety. MASTER DE(;LANT, THE MASTER ASSOCIATION, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND THE DESIGN REVIEV4~ITTEE, AND THEIR OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, MEMBERS, PARTNERS, AGENTS AND EMPLOI$ HEREBY DISCLAIM ANY OBLIGATION REGARDING THE SECURITY OF ANY PERSONS OR-PROPERTY WITHIN THE COMMUNITY. BY ACCEPTING A DEED TO PROPERTY WITHIN THE COMMUNITY, EACH OWNER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT MASTER DECLARANT, THE MASTER ASSOCIATION, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE, AND THEIR OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, MEMBERS, PARTNERS, AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES, ARE ONLY OBLIGATED TO DO THOSE ACTS SPECIFICALLY ENUMERATED HEREIN, OR IN THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, BYLAWS OR RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE MASTER ASSOCIATION, AND ARE NOT OBLIGATED TO DO ANY OTHER ACTS WITH RESPECT TO THE SAFETY OR PROTECTION OF PERSONS OR PROPERTY WITHIN THE COMMUNITY. Section 13.18. Headings. The Article, Section and subsection headings in this Master Declaration are inserted for convenience of reference only, do not constitute a part of this Master Declaration, and in no way define, describe or limit the scope or intent of this Master Declaration or any of the provisions hereof. Section 13.19. Gender. Unless the context requires a contrary construction, the singular shall include the plural and the plural the singular and the use of any gender shall be applicable to all genders. Section 13.20. Run with Land; Binding Upon Successors. The benefits, burdens and all other provisions contained in this Master Declaration shall be covenants running with and binding upon this Community and all real property and Improvements which are now or hereafter become a part thereof The benefits, burdens and all other provisions contained in this Master Declaration shall be binding upon, 36 and inure to the benefit of the Master Declarant, the Master Association and all Owners, and upon and to their respective heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set its hand and seal this day of ,2001. MELODY HOMES, INC., By Its: STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) 4 P. The foregoing instrument was aclaieWledg d bei as -of Melody' '6 AIne., x Witness my hand and offieial @teal (SEAL) = _ ` w.~.Voi by Public My Commission 230 PM 37 EXHIBIT A TO MASTER DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS OF SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 1 (Community) The following property as shown on the Final Plat of Skyline Estates 7, 2000, in Book 156 at Page 43, at Reception No. F1100835, in the County, Colorado, as amended and supplemented from time to tine:;; Lots through , inclusive, Block Lots _ through inclusive, Block Lots _ through , inclusive, Block ; Lots through , inclusive, Block_;. AND The following property as in Book 151 at Page 37,,a Colorado, as amendglazu Tracts on September of Jefferson ylihe Estates Filing No. 1, recorded on the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Jefferson County, A-1 EXHIBIT B TO MASTER DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS OF SKYLINE EST (Comm Tracts as shown on the Final Plat of ! Page 37, at Reception No. F0988769, in the office of th amended and supplemented from time to time. 3 k x 8 s. Yzq P Book 151, at Colorado, as B-1 EXHIBIT C TO MASTER DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS OF SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 1 (Certain Title Exceptions) If recorded, the following documents are recorded in the office of the Clerk Colorado: 1. TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS FOR THE YI DECLARATION AND FOR SUBSEQUENT 2. ANY TAX LIEN, FEE, OR IN THE NORTH JEFFCO I BY INSTRUMENT RECO] 3. TERMS, CONDPI SEPTEMBER 16, County, OF SUBJECT PROPERTY DISTRICT, AS EVIDENCED TION NO. 85088240. AGREEMENT RECORDED 1, 1987 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 87077271. 4. ANY TAX, LIEN EE, OR AS$E„SSMENT BY REASON OF INCLUSION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY IN T I0CLEAk:CkEEK'b _ Y WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT, AS EVIDENCED BY INSTRUMENT REQORDIfD~ OCTOBER 05, 1998, UNDER RECEPTION NO. F0708313. 5. ANY TAX, LIEN FEE, OR ASSESSMENT BY REASON OF INCLUSION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY IN TIM VRUJTDALE SANITATION DISTRICT, AS EVIDENCED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED MARCH 26'11995. UNDER RECEPTION NO. F0029255. 6. ANY TAX, LIEN, FEE, OR ASSESSMENT BY REASON OF INCLUSION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY IN THE VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, AS EVIDENCED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 26, 1997, UNDER RECEPTION NO. F0483404. 7. ALL RIGHTS TO ANY AND ALL MINERALS, ORES, AND METALS OF EVERY KIND AND CHARACTER AND ALL COAL, ASPHALTUM, OIL AND OTHER LIKE SUBSTANCES IN OR UNDER SAID LAND AND THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR THE PURPOSE OF MINING TOGETHER WITH ENOUGH OF THE SURFACE OF THE SAME AS MAY BE NECESSARY FOR THE PROPER AND CONVENIENT WORKING OF SUCH MINERALS AND SUBSTANCES AS RESERVED IN PATENT RECORDED JANUARY 06, 1995, AT RECEPTION NO. F0002618. 8. EASEMENTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, AND RESERVATIONS ON THE RECORDED PLAT OF SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 1 AND SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 1, AMENDED. 9. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF SKYLINE ESTATES SUBDIVISION FILING NO. 1 SUBDIVIDERS AGREEMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 9, 1999 UNDER RECEPTION NO. F0988770. FIRST AMENDMENT RECORDED AUGUST 17, 2000 UNDER RECEPTION NO. F1101255. 10. THE EFFECT OF ORDINANCE NO. 3635 RECORDED AUGUST 10, 2000 UNDER RECEPTION NO. F1097923. C-1 11. THE EFFECT OF CITY OF ARVADA ORDINANCE NO. 3556 RECORDED OCTOBER 14, 1999 UNDER RECEPTION NO. F0961790. 12. THE EFFECT OF CITY OF ARVADA ORDINANCE NO. 3633 RECORDED JULY, 21, 2000 UNDER RECEPTION NO. F1087510. 3 13. RIGHT OF WAY GRANTED TO PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COL PAD"" INSTRUMENT RECORDED JANUARY 4, 1966 IN BOOK 1844 AT PAGE 760. 14. RIGHT OF WAY AS GRANTED TO PUBLIC SERVICE COMP~\NYF COLORADO IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 30 1975,IN BOOK 2944 A;FPAGE 903 f 15. ANY TAX, LIEN, FEE, OR ASSESSMENT BYI EASON MINGEbS ON~OF JECT PROPERTY IN THE VALLEY WATER DISTRICT„AS EVIDENAD-81 IN&TRUI IEIVT CORDED DECEMBER 31, 1998, UNDER R-E CE VON1 01 F0768656t 16. THE EFFECT OF ORDINANCENO 34 4 RECD OC;~dBE 9, 1998 UNDER RECEPTION NO. F0724786. al I 17. TERMS, CONDITIQNS, BL~GAIONSAND EASEMENTS SET FORTH IN THE EASEMENT VACATION AND. SUBS= ITI IOT~AGREDMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CONSOLIDATED JUCHEMDI2'CH A' D SEIVOF C-0,01 AND KDB HOMES, INC. AND THE CITY OF ARUADA;RECORDED OOTOBER>7, 1999 UNDER RECEPTION NO. F0957791, AND RECORDED OCTOB~R_14. 199 UND~RREOBPTION NO. F0961791. 18. TERMS,CONDITIONS, OBLIGATIONS AND EASEMENTS SET FORTH IN THE EASEMENT VACATION IND SUBSTITUTION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN FRANK WEHLING, GREGORY S A, ARTHUR J. AND BARBARA J. AHO AND H.F. INVESTMENT COMPANY, LLC AND HOMES, INC. AND THE CITY OF ARVADA RECORDED OCTOBER 7, 1999 UNDERRWEPTION NO. F0957792. 19. ALL RIGHTS TO ANY AND ALL MINERALS, ORES, AND METALS OF EVERY KIND AND CHARACTER AND ALL COAL, ASPHALTUM, OIL AND OTHER LIKE SUBSTANCES IN OR UNDER SAID LAND AND THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR THE PURPOSE OF MINING TOGETHER WITH ENOUGH AND CONVENIENT WORKING OF SUCH MINERALS AND SUBSTANCES AS RESERVED IN PATENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 19, 1999 UNDER RECEPTION NO. F0979875. C-2 EXHIBIT D TO MASTER DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS OF SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. I (Annexable Area) All of the property as shown on the Final Plat of Skyline 2000, in Book 156 at Page 43, at Reception No. F11008. County, Colorado, as amended and supplemented from t All of the property as shown on the Reception No. F0988769, in the oft supplemented from time to time; ,n The proper m the W %a publicly on September 7, r of Jefferson as recorded in Book 151 at Page 37, at County, Colorado, as amended and f Section 16, T3S, R69W, 6th P.M., as well as the property located 16, T3S, R69W, 6m P.M., Jefferson County, Colorado; of the property described on Fxhihit A to this Master Declaration and any D-I MASTER DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND OF SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO. 1 ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS Section L1. Section 1.2. Section 1.3. Section 1.4. Section 1.5. Section 1.6. Section 1.7. Section 1.8. Section 1.9. Section 1.10. Section 1.11. Section 1.12. Section 1.13. Section 1.14. .....1 Agencies ...............................1 Allocated Interests f s..............................1 Annexable Area a a I Assessment t c..,...........................2 Board of Directors or Board 2 CCIOA .rv 3 E 2 Common Elements 3 y 2 Community.. sr ..............................................2 Design Review Cnmrnee or Commtft ...............................................2 Development Rights _ ..................................................2 r - Improvements w= ............................................................3 x Irnthally Unoccupr d-Zot 3 Lot,. ; y 3 hots that Ma Be Scluded, 3 lvlaster ssoegat ozt y~ 3 MM- Declarlsnt 3 s V ster Declaiahon 3 mberl - Q et y~ ................................................4 .......................................................................................................4 )P- rson 4 Section 1 21 r -security Interest 4 Section,l2•_:, cJecunty Interest Holder ............................................4 Secthon1.23j 75% Control Period ............................................4 Section J, Special Master Declarant Rights 5 Section i.25. Subassociation ............................................5 Section 1.26. Supplemental Declaration ............................................5 ARTICLE 2. MEMBERSHIP AND VOTING RIGHTS 5 Section 2.1. Master Association ............................................5 Section 2.2. Board of Directors ............................................5 Section 2.3. Voting Rights ............................................5 ARTICLE 3. MASTER ASSOCIATION 6 Section 3.1. Authority of Board of Directors 6 Section 3.2. Election of Part of the Board of Directors During the 75% Control Period 6 Section 3.3. Authority of Master Declarant During 75% Control Period ............6 Section 3.4. Termination of 75% Control Period ...........6 Section 3.5. Delivery of Property by Master Declarant 6 Section 3.6. Budget ...........6 Section 3.7. Rules and Regulations 6 Section 3.8. Master Association Books and Records ...........7 Section 3.9. Information Regarding Security Interests ...........7 Section 3.10. Management Agreements and Other Contracts 7 Section 3.11. Cooperation with Subassociations, any Community Association(s) and/or any Dis trict(s).7 Section 3.12. Merger 8 ARTICLE 4. ASSESSMENTS 8 Section 4.1. Section 4.2. Section 4.3. Section 4.4. Section 4.5. Section 4.6. Section 4.7. Section 4.8. Section 4.9. Section 4.10. Section 4.11. Section 4.12. Section 4.13. Section 4.14. Section 4.15. Section 4.16. Personal Obligation for Assessments 8 Purpose of Assessments 8 Initial Annual Assessment Rate of Assessment.......... 1 8 ARTICLE 5. DESIGN Section 5.1_. ' Section-51A Section ~ 3. 1 Section 5.4. Section 5.5: s Section 516., i Section.5:7._._. c Section 5 8_ Section5.4 ' Sectiowr.10. Section 5.11. Section 5.12. Section 5.13. Section 5.14. Section 5.15. Section 5.16. 8 A 9 a ........10 10 . 10 F ........11 3ociation 11 ........11 ........11 ........12 ........12 ......................................................................12 Appointment and Authority of Representative ....................12 mmittee; Reimbursement for Expenses; Requirement for Approval°by Gore ental Entities f D i R d A l e 3 ....................12 13 n (ad #cceptance) o es gn eview an pprova D legati e s . P`ocedur ....................13 Design 'Ca idelines ....................13 Vote and Appeal ....................13 Prosecution of Work After Approval ....................14 Notice of Completion ...................14 Inspection of Work 14 Notice of Noncompliance 14 Correction of Noncompliance 14 Records ....................14 Variance 14 Waivers; No Precedent 15 Liability ....................15 Master Declarant's Exemption ....................15 ARTICLE 6. INSURANCE ............15 Section 6.1. Insurance 15 Section 6.2. Worker's Compensation Insurance ................15 Section 6.3. General Provisions of Insurance Policies ................16 Section 6.4. Deductibles ................16 Section 6.5. Payment of Insurance Proceeds 16 Section 6.6. Master Association Insurance as Primary Coverage 16 Section 6.7. Acceptable Insurance Companies 16 Section 6.8. Insurance to be Maintained by Owners 17 Section 6.9. Annual Review of Insurance Policies ................17 ARTICLE 7. DAMAGE OR DESTRUCTION ................17 Section 7.1. Damage or Destruction 17 Section 7.2. Use or Distribution of Insurance Proceeds as to Common Elements 18 Section 7.3. Use or Distribution of Insurance Proceeds as to Lots 18 ii ARTICLE 8. EXTERIOR MAINTENANCE ..................................................................18 Section 8.1. Worker's Compensation Insurance Section 8.2. General Section 8.3. Master Association's Right to Repair, Maintain and Reconstruct. Section 8.4. Maintenance of and Non-Interference with Grade and Drain a - - I Recommendations Around Foundations and Slabs Section 8.5. Owner's Acts or Omissions .................................................Y.,.,,. ARTICLE 9. EASEMENTS Section 9.1 Section 9.2 Section 9.3 Section 9.4 Section 9.5 Section 9.6 Easements . Maintenance, Repair and Replac, Easement for Access to Commo Common Elements, "ities and Easement for Encroachments Easement for Unannexe ProUer ARTICLE 10. RESTRICTIONS ......................18 ......................18 ......................19 ..........................19 ..........................19 20 v 20 s ncl Easement .............20 . I .............20 ~ 20 21 21 21 Section 10 1 General Plan ..............................................................................21 Section 10.2. Restiicaonposd 3 ................................................................................21 Section 103 RedetiaLUe ....................................................................................21 Sectt6n.104 1 HxsehodPeYs ................................................................................22 _ r Section 30 5 Tg'mporary Sir_uc mss; Unsightly Conditions ...................................................................22 s Section i0 6 Iviliscellaneous provements ........................................................................................22 Section X10 7 ; : V hic- king, Storage and Repairs ...........................................................................23 Secti6n4s0 8 a . Nuisanoes .......................................................................................................................24 Section l0 9 No Hazardous Activities; No Hazardous Materials or Chemicals ....................................24 Section 10 104to Annoying Light, Sounds or Odors ..........................................................................25 Sectic# W Restrictions on Trash and Materials .................................................................................25 Sectioai4110. 7~.=12. Lots to Be Maintained ......................................................................................................25 Sectio13. Leases ...............................................................................................................................25 Section 10.14. Landscaping ......................................................................................................................25 ARTICLE 11. PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THE COMMON ELEMENTS 26 Section 11.1. Owners' Easements of Enjoyment ............26 Section 11.2. Extent of Owners' Easements ............26 Section 11.3. Use of Common Elements by Master Declarant 26 Section 11.4. Delegation of Use ............27 Section 11.5. Payment of Taxes or Insurance by Security Interest Holders ............27 Section 11.6. Conveyance or Encumbrance of Common Elements ............27 Section 11.7. Designation of Common Elements ............27 Section 11.8. Duty to Accept Property and Facilities Transferred by Master Declarant 27 ARTICLE 12. DISPUTE RESOLUTION ...................................................................................................................27 Section 12.1. Intent of Article; Applicability of Article; and Applicability of Statutes of Limitation.... 27 Section 12.2. Definitions Applicable to this Article ............................27 Section 12.3. Approval Required for Master Association Actions ............................28 Section 12.4. Notice and Quorum for Master Association Actions ............................28 Section 12.5. Required Form of Proxy or Ballot 29 Section 12.6. Exclusions from "Claim ............................29 Section 12.7. Right to Inspect 29 Section 12.8. Mandatory Procedures ............................30 iii Section 12.9. Liability for Failure of Master Association to Maintain an Action 31 Section 12.10. Severability .......................................................................................................................31 Section 12.11. Amendment .......................................................................................................................31 ARTICLE 13. GENERAL PROVISIONS Section 13.1. Enforcement; Fines Section 13.2. Severability Section 13.3. Conflict of Provisions Section 13.4. Conflict with CCIOA Section 13.5. Annexation; Withdrawal. Section 13.6. Minor Violations of Setback Restrictions r ,.;-5. Section 13.7. Subdivision or Replatting of Lots g Section 13.8. Master Declarants Use ...d....:..'.............',o Section 13.9. Duration, Revocation, and Amen-t Section 13.10. Registration ofM!pdin - address 3 Section 13.11. HUD or VA Approval l ; 3 . Section 13.12. Temmmation ofCon3mtudity Section 13.13. Transfer of Special Mas`ttgr Declarant Rrghts Section 13.14. EmincutTlotS~am Section 13.15. Liitntatr'an, I," pity Section 1-3.16 No~2epsesen 4onst Guarahhes or Warranties....... Section 13 17 Disla mer R ardmg Suety Section TMS -ad, Section 3 19 Gender a Section 13 20 s Rim with,kand; Binding Upon Successors Coition Elements Certain Title Exceptions Annexable Area ...............32 32 i 32 a 32 .3 ...........a.............. 32 ..............34 y t 34 34 35 ..............35 35 36 36 36 36 36 .............36 36 36 iv Skyline Filing 3 Fact Sheet City of Wheat Ridge Pre - Application February 19, 2002 1:30PM Total Site- 17.1 acres Single Family -7.04 acres (41%) 43 homes Industrial- 4.26 acres (25 %) Open Space- 1.76 acres (10 %) Right -of -Way -4.00 acres (24 %) Gross Density (w /out ind.)- 3.34 du /acre Proposed Zone District- RIC 5,OOOsf- -min. lot size 30' front setback 5' side setback 10' rear setback 25% lot landscaped Public Works 4' walk width (attached) 50' ROW for local streets ,e,i! C'd S s4 Parks /Open Space Dedication of Parks- 43homes X 0.016acre = 0.69 acre dedicated (4% of site) Cash in Lieu- Value of 0.69 acres post platting Encroachments- Porches/Decks /Patio- 8' front encroachment 1/3 side encroachment Architectural Features- 30" encroachment oft Bernhart - 002.GIF KIRK" MICHAEL Fax:303- 694 -2822 Feb 19 2002 8 :11 P.02 �t O A lY 2� 1 S n S vJ ir Lf Z2 am 11:uu P. 02 `t I 1 l I' I I � � s i 1 1 I ' 11 1 '1 — _'r 1 - - ;_. 7Z�! A 2 4 I rrr jl o a P. 5 i SA T 3 N i t Cz tz) R rri C) z Pt.h Al n r L Skyitnea Skc-tck Plate MelelyHo : 1 s 2.00 fi� Ri $& lisma PrOperty ur ov ShC 1--- -1 Rer.<wat Plav1: g $it'e Overlay • - � �� �� �I 11 II I! 11 �► % 1� �� ll I1 II I1 If i II it II � II II it r - W L.. —J L__. -J L - -J \,: Trcct Troctlftter E tot 1 4 ILI NG NO* / RVADA W. 1 54RLLANI �c az - - - - - - - - - - - — - T, t 4 r F L — — — J 11 ,,— ;4;m ,a E r7 Lluf I I11 yip I F F i r 4 IL — — L — — — J 11 ,,— ;4;m ,a E r7 Lluf I L— --j r I I r - -- I I I F F i r 4 ,a E r7 I ?LCO . _1 3 Tom Lul We i ..... ... ... S. zoo 4- /-08 -02 FRI 01!38 PM MELODY HOMES, INC FAX NO 303 466 2368 X i j ' ero: City of Wheat Ridge Skyline Filing 3 General Description Applicant- Melody Homes Subject- Skyline Filing 3 Jurisdiction- Whcat Ridge, Colorado Melody Ilomes is requesting initial review of the proposed Skyline Filing 3 site layout for approximately 17.66 acres within the City of Wheat Ridge. The proposed development would include 43 home sites with anticipated lot sizes at or above 6,600sf. piling 3 of Skyline Estates will include a north south connection between W. 5e Avenue and ridge Road (Nelson Sh -cot). An industrial tract is shown along Ridge Road, in accordance with the most recent master plan (Ridge Honne Property Urban Renewal Plan) While this plan was adopted by the City of Arvada in 1999, the plan appears to be the most recent master plan covering this area of Wheal Ridgc and Arvada. The future industrial area would be approximately 3 acres in sine and able to accommodate between 100 and 150 employees in up to a 50,0008f facility. P 02 . _ . _j Lt _ - (I11.OY'1 I.18Y' I 1 it SO F!rt "V8Ni its 2 G> 4 o° 8 1 e.w -. P PTION H11 A:r1--4n90 FBn I4' N an Jalluraw.. .� Mll f in YflMrl. J IBP llu EI /3 cl 'IM1S Snort rnryi,., Into y a 71t duS'{rlr�. .. / - / ,,� 11C✓/ � i/ UFYEI IIf F. fli FILfNfr IJIl 1 S ^ j EAS _A1 1, I ✓ ( IT WAR. $IEI 1(��%� 5 9Y']PIB�W (d J3J0 W TIM 03 (1]3 ) SPIID TINE SWI /�, WI /J M .01. IB GO ® / / / v. mull c fm sw /. /� CAP SET BE MERRICA(k CO. I %I /1 Af 11"l.", In ' n / � At COB k WHEAT MORE GORY � PLASTIC CAP PL^v 2]001 I Tl ({G I•P SgNJINE4r fANN3B NEl /J �� No�[5� YATN NrJ. L WTi 2` ION A I µp10E0[(i1 }IFRd.Rh11'a NY 4Ernox le.� I II h xle of I 6". for Ills 'W 1. SOO'ID J0`E Oran, the Wes] IIne al y " 4 un 'the NWI /d PI GO SIYI /d - of Seats. 16 helween fit. monrmeNr fmmJ at I /14 CORNER MARRING$ (- — zes• pURUN ilNnG b gG�G the SRI Eargei P/ the NWl /d and ILe SW earn., el the NWI 14 of the SWI /J. TH PLASTIC CAP,- LS 900] VAG Y; tlimnneln 1 1 Al-say ,. Nu!•. GGw m fl,. n ;w wllhmrl menrumd NY Merldlnn Alrrvo I In.. TTi PLASTIC CAP - LS 12A]e _ _ porea _ y n0• M(OVT CAP . 3. Load nlle Guartmlee CnmPany C.-indlat.rit No. Mr..556]a4, ailed - CONCRETE LEGEND GeomnhUr 26, 1996, wns call ly ra llad IPOn for record data mUmd]n9 � CAP IN MONUMENT 00% SET BY dUhty -a/ way, easamenls and n L naex In the as,ctrolian o1 1 R MONUMENT RECORD m 5 CENTF.RIJNA R.O.W. RICNi -Of, -WAY per fEMA MOUT CAP - OR, GUY.POLE 4. The surveyed slle 1. not IaNed o w111:hr Ibe IRO Yen, Thd zn a oe R,JUOUVd 9:u m 2` ALLOY MAN Gd OAS METER - O PM MOUNT TRANSFORMER Flood lniurnnce R.I. Map Y , Y . . Anl PLASTIC cal' - Ls 19007 (or In. Cit o! Arvndn _ I WIIN N0. 5 REBM At 2' CIA ELECTRIC METER �' STORM SEWFR MANHOLE _ Wheat o. 910511 _ "..9. N I dated feLrnnry i9, 199a (Zone `1(' Cammunll NP I)B5072 and for IIIe CITY of WLenl Zone Cammunlly, No. O085079. Map ( NO. a005f, delta fnbniary A,. 1 /IA CORNER AP- PLO 2]601 - -V— OVERT IEAD MUTY LINE, w T9F.PHONE IIm.E, 190A (Zone 'C`), 5ru.. �u� ATIi rAp - PL '[J INIFT . M WATER VALVE :R MARKINGS - ay ME IIYGRAIIT, T CLEAN MIT 51 properly md,lOCl la" dilcb N01Ms. _ An ORIITERATED PLASTIC CAP MTP TIFLEIMioNE PEDESTAI. —a— IINYERCRGMO GAS TINE (PAINTED) — I — UNDERCR9VND TURPH NNE LINE (PAINTED) 6. i.loe0se roaaMeO In Rook 28311 01 Page 11114 doer not a!(ocl Ihls. silo. j1:dl. •: I } - - ' —� POVATi Pair WB1 NY ANCHOR ^I¢— UMOf.R(tt0!RID REP,IRIC IJNE (PAINTER)' ' Alll(TUT CAP - BENT CAS VALVE 0 AR, FA LIGHT ' NOTICE: . Aaaardln0 la Colorado low yon mrtrl commence any /rdnl uellun Ann OBI.ITERATEO PLASWC.CM Iy SANITARY SFWER .MANIIOLE An-at upon any d.Ieal In Int. sn—, ..Ilia line. y.rns allay you ILSI I�I® 1 Wyly ;pl"'.}Imn;yLgnppyAl -� 1 � - - "T ' AGO PLASTIC CAP - I.S D]OO DITCH LINE � rllseam, snnh. derenl. In no l m ay any n aellea hated pn a n n dale. I a rl:eT I r Ind-cum OUT D hLn51h� CF A 0 r _frmci: VNEE 'a 'Id sellonszhiw�� �� % °ed m than ten I'onn I,on1 Ilia .1. .1 o