Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3125 Xenon Streeti CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE -.A Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office - (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type:`' Job Address: 3125 X£'v-jor) S_( Permit Number: ;20 ( � 0 I? 2 f ❑ No one available for inspection: Time C or ) Re -Inspection required: Ye! 1 Nn�--P When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303 -234 - Date: t Inspector: Z DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: 2yurF Job Address: Permit Number: -0C� r r C 1 2 4 ❑ No one available for inspection: Time AM/PM Re -Inspection required: Yes J14r When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933 Date: -7, 2 • 1 �, Inspector: DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE � A City of Wheat Ridge Residential Roofing PERMIT - 201801824 PERMIT NO: 201801824 ISSUED: 06/25/2018 JOB ADDRESS: 3125 Xenon ST EXPIRES: 06/25/2019 JOB DESCRIPTION: Reroof remove and install Owens Corning Storm Asphalt Shingles with 26 total squares, 25 squares house and 1 square shed. Pitch 4/12. *** CONTACTS *** OWNER (720)300-6758 ROBIE DAVID B SUB (303)761-6400 J. Bretz 018118 Excel Roofing, Inc. *** PARCEL INFO *** ZONE CODE: UA / Unassigned USE: UA / Unassigned SUBDIVISION CODE: 2403 / APPLEWOOD VILLAGES, PROSPECT V BLOCK/LOT#: 0 / *** FEE SUMMARY *** ESTIMATED PROJECT VALUATION: 10,279.92 FEES Total Valuation 0.00 Use Tax 215.88 Permit Fee 220.15 ** TOTAL ** 436.03 *** COMMENTS *** *** CONDITIONS *** Midroof & Final Roof inspections for ROOFS 6/12 PITCH & OVER: 3rd party inspection will be required for both the midroof and final inspections. The 3rd party inspection report AND THE ORIGINAL PERMIT CARD needs to be dropped off to the Permit Desk at the City of Wheat Ridge. The report MUST BE SIGNED by the Homeowner. REGARDING ROOF VENTILATION: Roof ventilation shall comply with IBC Sec. 1203.2 or IRC Sec. R806. The installation of ridge venting requires the installation or existence of soffit venting. For calculation purposes, one hat or turtle vent equal to one-half of one square foot of opening. Effective December 1, 2014, asphalt shingle installations require an approved midroof inspection, conducted when 25-75 percent of the roof covering is installed, prior to final approval. Installation of roof sheathing (new or overlay) is required on the entire roof when spaced or board sheathing with ANY gap exceeding one half inch exists. Sheathing and mid -roofs may be called in at the same time, one hundred percent of the sheathing must be complete and 25-75 percent of the mid -roof may be complete. Asphalt shingles are required to be fastened to the roof deck with a minimum of 6 nails per shingle. Ice and water shield is required. Eave and rake metal is required. A ladder extending 3 feet above the roof eave and secured in place is required to be provided for all roof inspections. Roof ventilation is required to comply with applicable codes and/or manufacturer installation instructions, whichever is more stringent. In order to pass a final inspection of elastomeric or similar type roof coverings, a letter of inspection and approval from the manufacturer technical representative stating that "the application of the roof at (project address) has been applied in accordance with the installation instruction for (roof material brand name) roof covering" is required to be on site at the time of final inspection. City of Wheat Ridge Residential Roofing PERMIT - 201801824 PERMIT NO: 201801824 ISSUED: 06/25/2018 JOB ADDRESS: 3125 Xenon ST EXPIRES: 06/25/2019 JOB DESCRIPTION: Reroof remove and install Owens Corning Storm Asphalt Shingles with 26 total squares, 25 squares house and 1 square shed. Pitch 4/12. I, by my signature, do hereby attest that the work to be performed shall comply with all accompanying approved plans and specifications, applica le building codes, and all applicable municipal codes, policies and procedures, and that I am the legal owner or have been authorized by the legal owner of the property and am authorized to obtain this permit and perform the work described and approved in conjunction with this ermit. I further attest that I am le ally authorized to include all entities named within this document as parties to the work toe performed and that all work to be performed is disclosed in this document and/orffits' accompanying approved plans and specifications. Signature of OWNER or CONTRACTOR (Circle one) Date 1. This permit was issued based on the information provided in the permit application and accompanying plans and specifications and is subject to the compliance with those documents, and all applicable statutes, ordinances, regulations, policies and procedures. 2• This permit shall expire 365 days after the date of issuance regardless of activity. Requests for extension must be made in writing and received prior to the date of expiration. An extension of no more than 180 days made be granted at the discretion of the Chief Building Official and may be subject to a fee equal to one-half of the original permit fee. 3. If this permit expires, a new permit may be required to be obtained. Issuance of a new permit shall be subject to the standard requirements, fees and procedures for approval of any new permit. Re -issuance or extension of expired permits is at the sole discretion of the Chief Building Official and is not guaranteed. 4. No work of any manner shall be performed that shall results in a change of the natural flow of water without prior and specific approval. 5. The permit holder shall notify the Building and Inspection Services Division in accordance with established policy of all required inspections and shall not proceed or conceal work without written approval of such work from the Building and Inspection Services Division. 6. The issuance or granting f a permit shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, an violation of any provision of any apph code or any r inance or regulation of this jurisdiction. Approval of work is subject to f any inspection. Signature of Chiet Building Official Date REQUESTS MUST BE MADE BY 11:59PM ANY BUSINESS DAY FOR INSPECTION THE FOLLOWING BUSINESS DAY. Lagenia Reimer COI(1 O/ /I 2 Z_/ From: no-reply@ci.wheatridge.co.us Sent: Monday, June 25, 2018 7:56 AM To: CommDev Permits Subject: Online Form Submittal: Residential Roofing Permit Application Categories: Gina Residential Roofing Permit Application This application is exclusively for new permits for residential roofs and for licensed ?1� contractors only. This type of permit is ONLY being processed online --do not come G to City Hall to submit an application in person. Permits are processed and issued in the order they are received and due to the volume of requests, time to process varies and is subject to change. YOU WILL BE CONTACTED WHEN YOUR PERMIT IS READY FOR PICK-UP AND WILL BE GIVEN A SPECIFIC DATE AND TIME WINDOW TO COMPLETE THE TRANSACTION. You will be notified if your contractor's license or insurance has expired, and you may update those documents at the time you are issued your permit. For all other requests: Homeowners wishing to obtain a roofing permit must apply for the permit in person at City Hall. Revisions to existing permits (for example, to add redecking) must be completed in person at City Hall. All other non -roofing permits must be completed in person at City Hall. The Building Division will be open from 7:30-10:30 a.m., Monday through Friday to process these types of requests. THIS APPLICATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A PERMIT. DO NOT BEGIN REROOFING UNTIL PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED. Is this application for a Yes residential roof? How many dwelling units Single Family Home are on the property? PROPERTY INFORMATION Property Address Property Owner Name 3125 Xenon St Gina and Dave Robie Property Owner Phone 720-300-6758 Number (enter WITH dashes, eg 303-123-4567) 6 d Property Owner Email Field not completed. Address Do you have a signed Yes contract to reroof this property? Applications cannot be submitted without an executed contract attached below. Attach Copy of Executed contract.pdf Contract CONTRACTOR INF0 A ION Contractor Business Excel Roofing, Inc Name �— `1 Contractor's License 018118 Number (This is a 5 or 6-�' digit number for the City of Wheat Ridge) Contractor Phone 303-761-6400 Number (enter WITH dashes, eg 303-123-4567) Contractor Address (Primary address of your business) 4510 S Federal Blvd Contractor Email Address excel@excelroofing.com Retype Contractor Email excel@excelroofing.com Address DESCRIPTION OF WORK TOTAL SQUARES of �26 the entire scope of work: _ Project Value (contract value or cost of ALL materi 10279.92 als and labor) Are you re -decking the No roof? Is the permit for a flat Pitched roof (2:12 pitch or greater) roof, pitched roof, or 2 both? (check all that apply) What is the specific pitc 4112 of the PITCHED roof? How many squares are 26 part of the PITCHED roof? Describe the roofing Owens Corning Storm materials for the PITCHED roof: Type of material for the Asphalt PITCHED roof: Provide any additional\ 25 sq house ; 1 sq shed detail here on the description of work. (T'- this T' this for a house or garage? Etc) SIGNATURE OF UNDERSTANDING AND AGREEMENT I assume full Yes responsibility for compliance with applicable City of Wheat Ridge codes and ordinances for work under any permit issued based on this application. I understand that this Yes application is NOT a permit. I understand I will be contacted by the City to pay for and pick up the permit for this property. I understand that work Yes may not begin on this property until a permit has been issued and posted on the property. I certify that I have been Yes authorized by the legal owner of the property to submit this application and to perform the work described above. I attest that everything Yes stated in this application is true and correct and that falsifying information in this application is an act of fraud and may be punishable by fine, imprisonment, or both. Person Applying for Norma Navarro Permit Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser. ♦ i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Bung Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 235-2857 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: Job Address: &f X gz,,~ ,ter Permit Number. ❑ No one available for inspection: Timej s6 AM/PM Re-Inspection required: Yes .N When corrections have been made, call for re-inspection at 303-234-5933 Date: 09 Inspector: DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE Astra Engineering LLC February 27, 2009 Complete Basement Systems 3250 Quentin St., #104 Aurora, CO 80011 Per your request, we made a site visit to the subject property on February 24, 2009 for the purpose of performing an inspection of the earth anchor installation. Per our inspection, it appears that all of the earth anchors were installed per the specifications and recommendations supplied by our office and the manufacturer. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact the undersigned. Sincerely, Tyrone R. Carter, P.E. Principal 2323 S. Troy Street #1-208 Aurora, Colorado 80014 Ph. 303-751-5075 Fax 866-235-1731 t1 oFw"Eqr~ City of Wheat Ridge Building Division Date: • 7500 W. 29th Ave., Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Office: 303-235-2855 * Fax: 303-235-2857 Plan -a)fo °OCOrsna° Inspection Line: 303-234-5933 Permit -7cl Building Permit Application Property Address:; 3 12 j ~C- N 0 r-A ST Property Owner (please print): -DAVE R0516 Phone: 3 6 3 - 481 - 590(? Contractor: C c7MpUe-T r_ F)-4Siit%7 S~ST~ 5 Contractor License Phone: 3 o3- a05 FS s Sut Co itiactors- Electrical City License Plumbing City License Mechanical City License Company: Company Company: 99- Exp. Date: Exp. Date: Exp. Date: Annrnval- Annrnval, Annrnval' !s -T ✓ Use of space (description): Description of Work; CC713A` i}7t0~ Wk" /}PlC40(l.S F2 t2E.DA-c R 4 s 9 6 Sq. Ft./L.Ft added: Squares BTU's Construction Value /A~ as calculated per the Building Valuation Data sheet) Plan Review (due at time of submittal): $ O~- '-i Gallons Amps OWNERICONTRACTOR SIGNATURE OF UNDERSTANDING AND AGREEMENT I hereby certify that the. setback distances proposed by this permit application are accurate, and do not violate applicable ordinances, rules or regulations of the City of Wheat Ridge or covenants, easements or restrictions of record; that all measurements shown, and allegations made are accurate; that I have read and agree to abide by all conditions printed on this application and that I assume full responsibility for compliance with the Wheat Ridge Building Code (I.B.C) and all other applicable Wheat Ridge Ordinances, for work under this permit. Plans subject to field inspection. CIRLCEONE:: I(OWNER) (CONTRACTOR) or PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE of (OV R) (CONTRATOR) PRINT NAME: ,z cf Hjm A1J SIGNATU . Dater 2 2 9 Mailing Address: (if different than property address) City of Wheat Ridge Building Permit Submittal List The following items are required for the single- or two family building permit submittal for the property located at 3 1?-5 `,(E1JtNJ $T . If any of the required items are not included in the submittal, the submittal will be considered incomplete and returned immediately without review. This sheet must be submitted with the building permit application. Please initial beside each required item, signifying that it has been included. Review Required by: ❑ Building ❑ Planning ❑ Public Works SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS: Plans: ❑ Three (3) full-sized (24" x 36") plans (Contents of plans detailed in the Single- and two-family handout) - yellow heading ❑ Three (3) stamped sets of foundation plans. ❑ Three (3) copies of a grading and erosion control plan. ❑ One (1) copy of a soils report. DOCUMENTATION: ❑ One (1) completed building permit application. ❑ One (1) property deed. ❑ One (1) certified survey or Improvement Location Certificate. 0 Proof of utility availability (form provided by city). ❑ One (1) building permit submittal list. The following items are required for the commercial or mUlti-family-building permit submittal for the property located at . If any of the required items are not included in the submittal, the submittal will be considered incomplete and returned immediately without review. If you had a pre-application meeting with Staff, you must submit the checklist you received. Otherwise, this sheet must be submitted with the building permit application. Please initial beside each required item, signifying that it has been included. Review Required by: ❑ Building ❑ Planning ❑ Public Works SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS: Plans: ❑ Four (4) full-sized (24" x 36") plans (Contents of plans detailed in the Commercial & Multi-family handout) - pink heading ❑ Two (2) copies of a final drainage report and plan OR Two (2) copies of a drainage letter and plan ❑ Two (2) copies of a grading and erosion control plan ❑ Two (2) copies of a traffic impact study OR Two (2) copies of a trip generation study DOCUMENTATION: ❑ One (1) completed building permit application. ❑ One (1) property deed. - ❑ One (1) certified survey or Improvement Location Certificate. ❑ Proof of utility availability (form provided by city). ❑ One (1) building permit submittal list. Astra Engineering LLC January 22, 2009 /APPROVED. Subject to Field Inspections Complete Basement Systems 3250 Quentin Street, #104 Aurora, CO 80011 Wheat Ridge Building Dept. Date: A dl . . Plan Per your request, I made a site visit to the subject prgpert}crctr( January 8, 2009 for the, purpose of performing a structural assessment of the residential structure. It is my understanding that the reason for this assessffient rgeuest was~tto crac s iced in the foundation walls and brick veneer of the house. The subject property is a single-story, siltgIe-family house wth'an attaekii d tvv garage and full basement locate~i'in do ~stabi'islied nig}borlioodb It is our tutderstanding that the house was constructed agpro?xrmate1y:50 years-ago The house iS'a' conventionally wood framed structure,fmished with brick veneer; ~cxrth 'ptfpos`es of this report, the house faces east. The foundation system used to support the house is most likely a poured concrete wall bearing directly on the ground or on continuous spread footings. There was no inspection performed of the roof structure. The following are the findings of my inspection and suggestions for further action, if required; 1. I inspected the exterior of the house and noticed numerous significant cracks in the exposed portion of the foundation, primarily on the south side of the house. Many of these cracks extended upward into the brick veneer. It is unknown if there is any reinforcement in the foundation wall and if there is any lateral support such as buttress walls. Some of the cracks were greater than of an inch in width and extended from the foundation well upward into the brick veneer. From a visual observation, it appears that the south foundation wall has bowed in at least three inches at the top and near the center of the span. It was difficult to tell the exact amount of inward deflection as a portion of the brick veneer is still attached to the top of the foundation wall and has begun to lean 2323 S. Troy Street #1-208 Aurora, Colorado 80014 Ph. 303-751-5075 Fax 856-235-1731 -4 CM7 S inward as well. From a visual inspection of the interior, it appeared that there was some inward deflection of the south wall as was noted from the exterior inspection. Again, from the interior inspection, the foundation wall appeared to bow inward approximately three inches. Additionally, there were significant diagonal cracks starting at the bottom of the foundation wall at each corner of the south wall and extending upward toward the middle part of the wall. Some of these cracks appeared to be recent and some of the cracks had been previously filled with a sealant but had since reopened. Based on the age of the house, there may not be any significant lateral support (counterforts) on this wall and steel reinforcing is probably minimal. Due to this apparent continued movement, the foundation should be stabilized and brought back to a more plumb condition. My inspection of the grade (slope) of the ground adjacent to the foundation on the west side of the house showed that there was significant slope toward portions of the house. Due to the types of expansive soil frequently found along the Front Range, moisture infiltration into the soil adjacent to the house foundation tends to increase the moisture content, causing the soil to swell and exert significant pressures against the foundation walls. If the foundation walls do not have lateral support in the form of buttress walls or counterforts, there may be inward deflection of the wall, as was noted in the basement inspection along the south wall. Recommendations: To help maintain the structural integrity of the house, the east basement wall should be brought back into a plumb position along the entire length. This can be accomplished with foundation earth anchors (tiebacks) I would estimate that five earth anchors would be needed to accomplish this portion of the remediation. I would recommend that the soil adjacent to the foundation on the south wall be excavated so that the earth anchors have a better chance of returning the wall to a more plumb position. It must be understood that it is almost impossible to completely return the wall to a fully plumb position due to numerous structural factors. The design of the earth anchors, including the layout is attached as an addendum to this report. Due to the significant cracking of the foundation and brick veneer, it may be necessary to fill these cracks with an epoxy sealant to help keep out potential moisture infiltration. It must be understood that moving the foundation may cause some additional cracking and doors/windows may require adjusting. This movement is normal and may Z V--F- 5" take some time to stop as the garage structure moves back to equilibrium. Also, I would recommend that all loose grout be removed from any cracks prior to putting any pressure on the anchors. We would recommend the ground slope adjacent to the house should be increased and maintained so that there is a minimum of six inches of drop in the first five feet out from the house. Due to the grade on the west side, it may be necessary to install a below ground drain system (French drain) to collect and carry any water away from the foundation. The design of this drain system is beyond the scope of this report. Most geotechnical engineers in the metro Denver area recommend that at least a 10 percent slope of the grade is maintained within the first five feet out from the foundation so that surface water is directed away from the foundation. Additionally, geotechnical engineers recommend against irrigation near the foundation as it may increase moisture content of the soil and lead to negative impacts to the structure in the future. As a general note, all downspouts should have minimum five foot long extensions such that water from the roof is completely removed from areas adjacent to the foundation. This would include the installation of appropriate splashblocks. It must be understood that this inspection was limited to visual observation only and that there is a possibility of structural issues that are not visually evident. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact the undersigned. Sincerely, Tyrone R. Principal 3 V-r- S- FRONT SUPPORT WORKS EARTH ANCHOR (TYP. OF 5) SEE DETAIL SHEET 52 FOR PLACEMENT OF EARTH ANCHORS Q ~t BASEMENT E N S FOUNDATION WALL l^{ BACKYARD i v w -m A ° O n m N O D D x n Z °z n A Z A (n 3 a K ° O K y 3125 XENON ST Complete Basement Systems A 3 0 ~ WHEAT RIDGE A N W Z CO 80215 3250 Quenlln 51. 9104 o e CO 0 A O . 80p PHONE 3034)05 9751 O FAX: 30MNI-1092 W Z A z C.,000) •3~gm~~ ityF 5 12' MIN FOUNDATI WALL INTERIOR- FACE OF FND WALL BASEMENT SLAB A n SQUARE NUT ROUND WASHER SQUARE WASHER WALL PLATE PVC, WALL SLEVE -THREADED COUPLER 5 REQ'D) ANCHOR STEEL ROD 4.5' AND 9') EARTH ANCHOR SQUARE NUT e O 00 2 A W -A _ H O 0 M D z Z o n o ° n :E K 00 I^ V I A z M K n ° e O A O o tl z A w 3125 XENON ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80215 g~U Complete Basement Systems B S z a M1 M... entin St.# 106 3 m ~'1'f Mil g s' g co 8001 P RM: HONE: 30.180751 3 Permit Number Building Permit 19384 ~CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE 10/21 /2005 7500 West 29TH Avenue Wheatridge, CO 80033 Inspecfion Line 303-235-2855 303-234-5933 Residential Remodel PROPERTY 3125 Xenon St Unit: owtvER: David Robie (303) 462-5808 Description Iteplace Trnsses, drywall, roofmg, elechical due to water damage ~ ]Paid . $532.76 ~ - Units: Occupancy: Walls: Roof: Stories: Sq Feet 0 I Mreby artify NN [he selbaek dispances propoeeJ Ey dM1is permlt vpplineion mre uccunm, nnd do not vWbm appLceble ordimnces rulen or regulnlloos of tFe City of ' Wlwt Ridge o roveno nsem 1 or reatdeHona o(rccoN, [hat nll measu enta showq a a 11 gmions mod< are, cunm, tA e 1 hale revd md agree t b d by Wgm'xc, fmc'T appL 0 dthallneeumefullresponabJityf nplimce thlM1 V\heat lUtlQ B IdinRCade(UBC) ntlvll ~h pPli, bl WYwar ntle t hie pernnt O) -SIGNEDDATE ITMepermit wae issuetl In vaordance with eM1e provulons sat forth in your app4cvlian and is subjal ro IM1s luws of IM1<Sinte af Calorado untl ro tM1e Zoning Reenliatlam antl Buildine Code o! W hevt Rldge, Coloredo ar any a1M1er nppLcable ortlmanres of Ihe City. 1, 1T4pe'mtlfhvllenpireif(A)IM1ewarkaulM1Or¢etlisnalaommeneMwilAinslxp'(60)OvysGomisxuetlnleor(B) thebuiltlnngnunliorbzedissmpm0etlor ibantlonetl for+ periotl of 1E0 tlrys. J, I(thiepetmtlexp4es.vnewperM[meybeecquireJfara &eofono-M1VlflM1enmounlnormWyrequi'fd.~^ovlJetlmc~¢ o gre(suse bernorwillb~mame^,tM1e orlelnW p~am and specificetiov mJ any suspeneion or abmAOnmrnt hvs me aeeeded one (1) ynr. ees ve mn yensian ar •b . eueeds on<(1) yevq full fees shnll be p+id (or v nm permit. .4 Howoe4ofaoymanneraha116edonetM1a1wi11changetM1enalunlllox'ofx'aMrcnusingadnmngeproblem 5_ Contracbnhallnolify[heBuilJinglnspeclm[wenty-(om(EQFOOnlnvdvanreforallinspeRionsvnOSM1Vllrcren'ewd¢enapVrovalaninsprelioneardbe(orc pmttWine wi[A mtttsvive pFVnes af tlle fob. 6 i4elwaoceofvpermitorfheapprovdo(drswing.vnndspecifiavtiomshvlimlbewnatruetlrobenpermilfor,norvnapprovalof,anyOobtlanaf[he . Friday, October 21, 2005 rage I oi I j rr:, Building Permit CTTY OF WHEAT RIDGE 7500 West 291T-I Avenue , Jw~~ Wheatcidge, CO 80033 , 303-235-2855 ciyarvm~ isepe Residential Remodel Permit Number 19384 1 0/21 /2005 Inspection Line 303-234-5933 PROPERTY 3125 Xenon St UDIt: owNEx: David Robie (303) 462-5808 Description Replace Trusses, drywall, roofing, electrical due to water damage. Authorized By guilding Approval Zoning Authorized On 10/21/2005 Approved By KS trusses must meet 30 Ib per sq ft. snow load Friday, Oc[ober 21, 2005 Page ] of 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ~ ~F WHEqrP gUILDING INSPECTION LINE - 303-234-5933 ~ o, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE ~ 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 - (303-235i-2855) ~lORPO~ . . APPl-1l-A Property Address: 3/•1 f X 4~^N e eJ S?, Contractor License No.: Company: j~c`S i ORA~l~ OteJ S,4--2 U Building Permit Number: Date: Phone: 3 63°09A Phone: 3,'j •_1SL-Y/N6 OWNER/CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE OF UNDERSTANDING AND AGREEMENT I BuildinaDeat Va/uationFigule: S I hereby certify.that the setback distances proposed by this permit application are accurete, and do not violate applicable ordinances, rules or regulatlons of the City of V31U0:$ W heat Ridge or crovenants, easements or restrictions of record; that all measurements shown, ond allegations made are accurete; that I have read and agree to abide by all Permit Fee:$ . conditions printed on- this application and that I assume full responsibility for plan Review Fee:$ compliance with fhe W heat Ridga Building Code (I.B.C) and all other applicable W heat Ridge Ordinances, for work under this permit. Plan subJect to field inspection. Use T3X:$ DATE'-_0 z1'-k TOt'd.l:$ Use of Space (description): Description of work: (Z,fp~~~r j~e-•.+iS'c~ .,,,ryLL-, P.-40'='N4/ Ff-cr'" I Sq.Ft.added Expiration Date: Expiration Date: Expiration Date: Approval: Approval: Approval: (1) This pertnitwas issued In accordance with the provlsions set forth in your applicaGon and Is subJedto the laws ofthe State of Colorado and to the Zoning Regulatlons and Buflding Codes of Wheat Ridge, Colorado or any otfier applicable ordinances of the Ciry. (2) This permit shall expire if (A) the work authorized is not commenced within sixly (90) days from issue date or (B) the building authorized is suspended or abandonad for a period of 180 days. (3) If this pertnit expires, a new permit may be acquired for a fee of one-half the amount normally requlred, provided no changes have been orwill be made in the original plans and specifications and anysuspensfon or abandonment has notexceeded one (1) year. If changes have been or if suspension or abandonment exeeeds one (1) year, full fees shall be paid for a new pertnit. (4) No work of any manner shall be done thatwill change the natural flow of water causing a draina8'e problem. (5) Contractor shall notify the Buildin9 Inspector twenty-four (24) hours in advance for ail inspections and shall receive written approval on inspectlon card bafore proceeding with successive phases of tha Job. (6) The issuanca of a permit or the approval of drawings and specificatlons shall not be construad M be a pertnit for, nor an approvai of, any violation of the provislons of the butlding codas or any other ordinance, law, rule or regulation. All plan revlew Issubjeettofleldlnspections. , Chief Buildina Official Electrical License No: Plumbing License No: Mechanical License No: Company: Company: Company: Restoration Servicea, Inc. 5295 Lincoln St. Denver Co. 80216 P6. 303-296r4106 Faz.303-296-4223 10/20l2005 Estimate: ROBTE_DAViD B Claim Number: palicyNumber: O6K143-096 06-ET-4906-7 Insured: ROBIE, DAVID B Type of Loss: Wa~ property; 3125 XENON ST CO 80215-6541 WHEAT RiDGE Deductiblc: $1,000.00 , Price List: CODESFSCI Home: (303) 462-5808 Restoratian/Scrvicc/Rcmodel F= Factored Tn, D= Do Not Apply Date of Loss: 07/2112005 Dace Inspected: 10/04/2005 Summary for Water 25,045.14 LineIttmTotal 0 Q 2.900 /o x 5,96233 172.91 State Sales Tax @ 4.700°a x 5.96233 280.23 i.ocal Sales Tax 25,498.28 Replacement Cost Value (0.00) Less Depreciation 25,498.28 AcWal Cash Value (ACV) 0°. x 10 25,49818 2,549.83 . Overhead 10.0°/s x @ 25,498.28 2,549.83 Profit 30,597.94 Actual Cash Value (including Overhead and Profit) (1,000.00) Less Deductible (p,pp) I.ess agreed value of salvage retained by the insured $29,597.94 Net Actual Cash Value Paymem Kevin Thompson (303) 941-2754 ALL AMOUNTS PAYABLE ARE SUBJECT TO THE "1'ERMS, CONDITIONS AND LIMIT5 OF YOUR POLICY. Restoration Services, Inc. ROBTE, DAViD B 10/20/2005 ROBIE_DAVID_B Milu Level k cum P + Room: Garage 664.00 SF Walls 1091.50 SF Walls & Ceiling 47.50 SY Flooring 83.00 LF Ceil. Perimeter 427.50 SF Ceiling 427.50 SF Floor 83.00 LF Floor Perimeter DESCRiPTfON QUANTTTY UNTf COST RCV DEPREC. ACV Temporary shoring post - Screw 18.00 DA 27.81 • 500.58 500.58 jack (per day) The sbwe ltem Is for 6 Jacke foi 3 days to adJas[ the ezistlng Ndge board and the back garage wall where the last trusa wlll sit. Contem Manipulauon chazge - per 36.00 HR 32.70 1,17720 1,177.20 hour the above item is to detach and resM the contents in the garage. Job-site stor. container - pick 2.00 EA 99.25 198.50 198.50 up/del. chazge (each way) Job-site storage container - 20' long 1.00 MO 9320 93.20 93.20 - per month Detach & Reset Overhead door & 1.00 EA 351.85 351.85 351.85 hardwaze - 16X 7'- Staadard grade Detach & Reset Overhead (garage) 1.00EA 13533 13533 135.33 door opener - Standard grade Labor to se[ up and take down 4.00 EA 25.42 101.68 101.68 scaffold - per section Scaffold rentai - per secflon (per 12.00 R'K 28.52 34224 34224 week) The above item is foar sectlons for [6ree weeks. Stud wall - 2" x 4" z 8' - 24" oc 16.00 LF 12.24 195.84 195.84 Sheathing-plywood-1/2"CDX 112.OOSF 1.28 14336 14335 The above two items are to temp wall the garage door hole daring repairs. R&R 5/8" drywall - hung & fire 552.00 SF 1.45 800.40 800.40 taped only the above item 6 to access the wa11 framing to put in 4i4 pos['s to support [hree trnss girders. Alse to build a new Imee wall above the wall at m1d span. 4" x 4" square wood post (133 BF 60.OOLF 4.66 279.60 279.60 per LF) The above item is far the poat's under the girder aveaea Framing shap - 24" long 8.00 EA 15.56 124.48 124.48 the above item ia to sttap the 4z4 poat'a to the exisstlng wall's Remove loist - floor or ceiling - 427.50 SF 031 132.53 132.53 7ac6 - w/blacking - 24" oc Remove Sheathing - spaced 1" x 6" 800.00 SF 0.40 320.00 320.00 ROBIE_DAVID_B Page: 2 Restoratlon Services, Inc. ROB(E, DAVID B 10/20/2005 CONTIPTULD - Garage DESCR1P770N QUANTITY UNIT COST RCV DEPREC. ACV Removt Rafters - 2x6 - 24" OC (3- 427.50 SF 0.52 22230 222.30 5/I2 Gable, per SF of tloar) Truss - 4/12 slope - heavy loading 183.OOLF 6.09 1,114.47 1,114.47 Girder trusa - 4/12 slope 126.OOLF 7.75 996.50 976.50 Cazpenter - General Framer - per 24.OOHR 55.37 1,328.88 1,328•88 hour The above item is tLree men at one 8 hour day to assemble t6e hip and girder traesea to match the existlng roof line. Sheathing - plywood - 3/4" CDX 500.00 SF 1.99 1,592.00 1,592.00 Framing humcane tie 31.OOEA 4.98 15438 15438 Framinghanger - large 2.00EA 8.53 17.06 17.06 FramingLanger 13.OOEA 7.79 101.27 101.27 Crane and operawr- 14 ton 4.00HR 112.54 450.16 450.16 capacity - 65' ex[ension boom Carprnter - General Framer - per 12.00 HR 5537 664.44 664.44 hwr the above labor ia to straiten aud brace the garage walla aRer the nRera hAVe been removed and to tarp t6e roof for weather dadng repairs. ELECTRICAL 1.00EA 968.00 968.00 968.00 The below items are to rebaild back garage will per engineer letter. Cazpenter - General Framer - per 16.00HR 5537 885.92 885•92 hour The above icem la to cu[ the existlug rafters to meet w(th the closest trass to the wa0 and put in sll braciug. 2" x 4" x 16' #2 & better Fir / Larch 1 Z.00 EA 7.14 85.68 85.68 (material only) 1Le abme item is for bndng materials. RBcR Srud wall - 2" x 4" -16" ac 100.00 5F 2.00 200.00 200.00 The above item is to rebuild the wall that will wpport the eristing rstten. Framinghanger 20.OOEA 7.79 155.80 155.80 Framinghwricanetie 10.00EA 4.98 49.80 49.80 RoomToWls: Garage 13,863.43 0.00 13,847.45 ROBIE,_DAVID_B Page: 3 ROBiE, DAVTD B Restoratlon Services,Inc. 10120/2005 t _ Room: Front Elevalion DESCRiPTION QUANTiTY UN17' COST RCV DEPREC. ACV R&R Gutter / downspout - 53.001,17 4.10 217.30 21730 aluminum R&R Soffit & fascia - wood - 2' 43.00 LF 8.43 362.49 362.49 overhang R&R Sofft - box framing _ Z' 41.00 LF 5.24 214.84 214.84 overLang Prime & paint exterior fascia - 43.00 LF 1.16 49.88 49.88 wood, 6"- 8" wide Prime & paint exterior soffit - 86.00 SF 1.21 104.06 104.06 wood 't~vo ladders with jacks and plank 2.OOEA 95J5 191.50 191.50 (per daY) Room Totals: Front ElevsHon 1,140.07 0.00 1,140.07 < ? Raom: Right Elevatloa DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNI7' COST RCV DEPREC. ACV RBcR Gutter/downspout - SO.OOLF 4.10 205.00 zw.uu aluminum R.~R Soffit & fascia - wood - 2' 40.00 LF 8.43 337.20 33720 overhaag R&R Soffit - boz framing - 2' 38.00 LF 5.24 199.12 199.12 overLang Ptime & paint exterior fascia - 40.00 LF 1.16 46.40 46.40 wood, 6"- 8" wide 96 91 91.96 Prune & paint exterior soffit - 76.00 SF 121 . wood Two ladders withjacks and plank 2.OOEA 95J5 191.50 191.50 (per daY) Page. 4 ROBIE_DAVID_B Restoration Services, Inc. ROBiE, DAVID B 10/20/2005 CONTiNUED - Rig6t Elevstian DESCRiI'TfON QUANTITY UNTT COST RCV DEPREC. ACV Room Totals: Right ElevaNon 1,071.18 0.00 1,871.18 .H., ~.e Room: Dtuing room 44933 SF Walls 621.92 SF Walls & Ceiling 19.18 SY Flooring 56.17 LF Ceil. Perimeter 172.58 SF Ceiling 172.58 SF Floor 56.17 LF Floor Perimeter DFSCRiPTfON QUANTITY UNIT COST RCV DEPREC. ACV R&R I/2" dtywall - hung, taped, 160.00 SF 2.08 332.80 332.80 with smooth wall finish The above item is so the wall can be reframed per engineer. Contcnt Manipulation chazge - per 2.00 HR 32.70 65.40 65.40 hour SeaUprime the surface azea - one 160.00 SF 030 48.00 48.00 coat Paint the surface area - rivo coau 160.00 SF 0.54 86.40 86.40 Paint part of the walls - one coat 28933 SF 032 92.59 92.59 I have here to paint ose wall 2 tlmes to cover the pHmer. Room Totals: Diniug room Area Totals: Main Levcl 1,113.33 SF Walls 600.08 SF Floor 600.08 Floor Aroa 80933 Exterior Wall Area 600.08 SF Ceiling 66.68 SY Flooring 600.08 Total Area 101.17 Exterior Perimeter of Walls 625.19 0.00 625.19 7,773.42 SF Walls and Ceiling 139.17 LF Floor Perimeter 139.17 LF Ceil. Perime[er 1113.33 interior WaU Aroa Ares itema Total: Matn i.evel Raof 16,699.89 0.00 16,699.89 ROBIE_DAVID_B Page: 5 Restoration Services,Inc. ROBiE, DAVID E 10/20/2005 i - I R ' T I ~ ..~--m-a . Y~er-ti Room: Roofl 2906.83 Surface Area 223.04 Total Pe[imeter I,ength 115.99 Total Hip Length 29.07 Number of Squares 24.83 Total Ridge LengtL DESCRIPTION QUANITTY UNIT COST RCV DEPREC. ACV R&R £la.clilng - pipe jack 6.00 EA 2531 151.86 151.86 R&R Chnnney flashing - lazge (32" 1.00 EA 266.63 266.63 266.63 x 60") Laminated - 30 yr. - comp. shingle 31.98 SQ 123.00 3,933.54 3,933.54 rfg. - w/out felt Remme Tear off, haul & dispose 29.07 SQ 40.00 1,162.80 1,162.80 of 1 st layer composition ahiagles R&R Roof vent - nuUe type 4.00 EA 38.90 155.60 155.60 R&R Drip edge 223.OOLF 1.52 338.96 338.96 Roofing fdt - 301b. 29.07 SQ 22.00 639.54 639.54 Room Totals: Roofl 6,648.93 0.00 6,648.93 Area Totals: Roof 153.29 Exterior Wall Area 2906.83 Surface Area 24.83 Total Ridge Length Area I[ema Total: Roof t < 29.07 Number of Squares 223.04 Total Perimeter Length 115.99 7otal Hip I.ength Room: GENERAL 6,648.93 0.00 6,648.93 DESCRIPTION QUANTfI'Y UN1T COST RCV DEPREC. ACV Temporary toilct (per month) 1.00M0 110.00 110.00 110.00 Dumpster load - Appmx. 30 yazds, 1.OOEA 385.22 385.22 38522 5-7 tons of debris General Laborer - per hour 16.00 HR 32.70 523.20 523.20 The sbove labor is to cut and de baclc t6e vegetation aroand the job sita Two men one day. ROBIE_DAVID B Page: 6 Restoration Services,Inc. to/2o/z0o5 ROBTE, DAVID B CON7'INUED - GENERAL DESCAiPT(OPT QUANTI7'V UIV17' COST RCV DEPREC. ACV Room Totals: GENERAL 1,018.42 0.00 1,018.42 Line ltem Sa6totals: ROBTE_DAViD_B 24,367.24 0.00 24,367.24 Adjastments for Base Service CharQa Adjoslment 710.54 Carpenter - General Framer 234.12 Drywall Installec/Finisher 122.78 Ovefiead Doar Installer 87.14 Painter 12332 Siding Tnstaller Total Adiustrnents for Basc Service Charges: 677.90 LtneItemTotals: ROBIE_DAV[D_B 25,045.14 0.00 25,045.14 Grand Total Areas: 1,11333 SF Walls 600.08 SF Ceiling 1,713.42 SF Walls and Ceiling 600.08 SF Floor 56.68 SY Flooring 139.17 LF Floor Perimeter 0.00 SF Long Wall 0.00 SF Short Wall 139.17 I.F Ceil. Perimeter 600.08 Floor Area 600.08 Totai Area 1,11333 Interior Wall Area 962.63 Extecior Wall Area 101.17 Exterior Perimeter of Walls 2,906.83 Surface Area 29.07 Nwnber of Squares 223.04 Total Peruneter Length 24.83 Total Ridge Length 115.99 Total Hip Length ROBIE_DAVID_B Page: 7 ROB1E, DAViD B Restoratlon Services,Inc. Trade Summary O&P Items CONTENT MANIPU[.ATTON GENERAL DEMOLTTION DOORS DRYR'AT i. ELEC'IRiCAL HEAVY EQUIPMENT FRAMIIVG & ROUGA CARPENTRY LABOR ONLY PAINfiNG ROOFING SCAFFOLDING SpFFIT, FASCTA, & GUTTER TEMPORARY REPAIRS Sub[otal Base Service Charges State Sales Tax Local Sales Tax Overhead Profi[ O&P Items Subtotal Leyy Dednctible Grand Total ROBIE_DAVIDB @ 2.900% @ 4.700% @ 10.00% @ 10.00% t0/20/2005 Totxl Dollars % 1,53430 5.01°/. 385.22 1.26°/. 487.18 1.59Y. 1,133.20 3.70°/. 968.00 3.16°/. 450.16 1•47% 9,544.89 3011°/. 523.20 1.71 519.29 1.70Y. 6,648.93 21.73°/. 826.92 2.70°/. 1,535.95 5.02Y. 110.00 036•/. 24,367.24 79.64°/. 677.90 2.22% 172.91 0.57% 28023 0.92°/a 2,549.83 833°/a 2,549.83 833% 30,597.94 IOO.IW°/. (1000.00) 29597.94 Page: S CENSpace Structural, LLC Structural Engineering / Design / Inspection / Repair 11332 Oswego Stree[ 1401 E. Bndge Street Hendersoq CO 80640 Brighton, CO 80601 Phone: (303) 286-0116 Phone: (303) 655-9116 September 5, 2005 Mike Cooper Claim Representative State Fann Fire and Casualty Company 1555 Promontory Circle P.O. Box 339409 Greeley, CO 80633-9409 Owner/Resident: Subject Location: Insurance Claim Dear Mr. Cooper: David Robie 3125 Xenon St. Wheat Ridge, CO 80215 06K-143-096 Project#: C0.2603.00 CENSpace Structural, LLC investigated the subject location on August 19, 2005. The following report includes the project objective, observations recorded from the site visit, analyses of the observations as well as recommendations to repair the damage. Supplemental photos and sketches have been attached and aze referenced in this report. OBJECTIVE: The cause and extent of the roof damage at the subject location is to be determined as well as feasible methods to repair the damage. OBSERVATIONS: The subject location refers to a single story wood-framed home built in 1952. For the purposes of this report the front of the house faces south. The exterior is constructed with a brick masonry faqade and the hip framed roof is covered with asphalt shingles. There is an attached two-caz gazage at the east end of the house, which pazallels an enclosed porch at the back of the home. Some time ago, the owners noticed cracks in the ceiling along the wall between the gazage and porch room and more recently, cracks were discovered in the garage roof rafters. Upon fiuther investigation, the owners discovered that the exterior roof was sagging over the garage portion of the home. The following observations describe the existing condition of the home at the time of inspection. The issues described below are based upon visual inspections and field measurements performed utilizing non-destructive methods. 1. The hip roof is conventionally framed with 2x6 rafters spaced at 24" on centers. The rafters tie into 2x8 ridge boards and hip rafters along the interior of the roo£ Some additional 2x4 support framing was also provided throughout the roof system (Refer to Figure 1). Another C0.2603.00 Page 1 of 6 CENSpace Structural, LLC Structural Engineering / Design / Inspection / Repair notable observation includes the existence of a concrete masonry unit (CMU) fireplace between the main portion of the home and the gazage. Also, the roof pitch between the main house and the gazage are different. The gable roof pitch over the main section of the home was measured as 4.25:12 and the hip roof pitch over the gazage was measured as 3.5:12. 1.1. Some structural damage exists in the attic space over the main portion of the home. Significant cracks were discovered in five 2x6 rafters inside the attic space. Portions of the observed cracks along all five of these members appeaz to be recent based upon the light color of the wood inside these cracks. Three of the interior 2x4 diagonal supports also have cracks along the lengths of these members. The cracks originate from the notch cut into the ends of each member to fit azound the 2x4 horizontal support (Refer to Figure 2). 1.2. Some of the gazage roof framing is damaged. One hip rafter, which extends from the southeast corner of the exterior garage wa11 beyond the center of the garage roof, is badly cracked neaz midspan (Refer to Figure 3). This hip rafter is the main roof support member in the gazage. A 2x6 horizontal support member undemeath this rafter is also cracked as well as a few of the longer span common rafters in the gazage. Refer to Sheet D.1 for a sketch of the partial roof plan. 2. A lazge gap exists in the wall-ceiling line along the enclosed porch room adjacent to the garage (Refer to Figure 4). It appears that the floor has sunk in this azea because the ceiling is nearly level and there aze gaps between the floor and the walls. The owners stated that this room was added/enclosed before they took residence and indicated that other cracks appeazed in this room prior to any significant snow event. ANALYSIS OF OBSERVATIONS: Since it is unknown when the roof sag appeared over the gazage, no incident of any particulaz snow event that may have caused the observed damage has been determined. However, structural analyses of the garage roof framing indicate that many of the existing roof inembers, including the members that cracked aze inadequate to carry the normal design roof loads. It is likely that some of the lazger snow events, which have occurred over the last two to three years, would have caused the observed roof damage. The normal design roof snow load for this azea is 30 psf and the dead load of the roof is estimated to be 10 psf for asphalt shingles including the associated roofing materials. Struchual calculations reveal that roof rafters having a cleaz span of 10 feet or longer do not have the design capacity to cany these loads. About half of the rafters in the gazage and several of the rafters in the attic cleaz span at least 10 feet. The long hip rafter that cracked was supported neaz midspan by a vertical member that frames down to a single, horizontal 2x6 "beam" spanning across the width of the gazage. Load calculations suggest that a lazge point load was transferred from the long hip rafter to the horizontal beam causing the beam to crack. Once this support beam cracked and deflected downwazd, the hip rafter similazly broke and deflected causing the evident sag in the roo£ This may also explain, at least in part, why the measured roof pitch of the garage is significantly different from that of the house. Only a few of the rafters inside the attic have a clear span over 10 feet due to the intermediate framing shown in Figure 1 below. However, the load transferred from the rafters to the interior C0.2603.00 Page 2 of 6 CENSpace Structural, LLC Structural Engmeering / Design / Inspecnon / Repair horizontal supports, appear to have cracked the 2x4 diagonal supports that frame down to the interior bearing walls. This pattern of cracking is commonly the result of heavy roof snow loads. The cracks in the five rafters noted in Section 11 above aze minor but are also thought to be the result of roof snow loads. RECOMMENDATIONS: Based upon the analyses of observations stated above it is recommended that minor repairs be made to the five cracked 2x6 rafters and the three 2x4 diagonal supports in the attic, but the garage roof should be replaced. The existing gazage roof framing is significantly under-designed and is not expected to withstand another moderate snow event without sustaining additional structural damage. In consideration of repairing/reinforcing the existing gazage roof, it is not feasible to shore the badly sagging roof back to its original position and simultaneously replace the main hip rafter that supports most of the roof azea as well as the other broken members. The volume/height in the gazage ceiling may be maintained by installing two premanufactured metal plate connected trusses to replace the two 2x6 horizontal "beams" spanning the width of the gazage. These two trusses may be designed to carry new inframing roof rafters properly designed to span between the truss framing. The strengkh of the exisring gazage headers should also be considered if the roof loads aze redistributed using this framing configuration. Alternatively, the gazage roof may be redesigned to be framed entirely by premanufactured trusses. The cost of reframing this section of the roof entirely with trusses would likely be higher and the bottom of the truss framing would extend down further into the gazage than would conventional rafter framing. Special consideration should be given to the connections between the new roof and the existing roof as well as between the girder trusses and the gazage because this is a firewall, which extends to the roof, and its fire rating must be maintained. Since the roof deflection over the main house is not considered significant, the cracked rafters may be reinforced/repaired by scabbing new, properly designed members alongside the damaged portions. A similar repair is recommended for the cracked diagonal supports. Also, addirional vertical supports may be installed along the interior bearing walls to supplement the existing supports. In order to provide the best repair solution for replacing the garage roof and reinforcing the damaged attic members, it is recommended that the engineer, the building contractor and a truss designer represenring the truss manufacturer, convene at the subject location to devise a roof design and repair procedure. These recommendations represent the opinions of the undersigned based upon the information presented in this report. It is possible that the current observed conditions might change over time and can significantly affect or influence the opinions stated and recommendations presented herein. CENSpace Structural, LLC makes no guarantee, neither implicit nor explicit, that any portion of the contents of this report and/or associated drawings represents the complete or sole solution. Acceptance of this report by the clienUagent sigtifies that it is understood that additional investigation(s) or destructive testing/inspection(s) may be required to discover Page 3 of 6 C0.2603.00 CENSpace Structural, LLC Structural Engineering / Design / Inspection / Repair unknown conditions or to explore previously inaccessible azeas of the structure and that modifications or addendums to this report and/or any associated drawings could be required. Tim Morgen, P.E. Structural Engineering Manager C0.2603.00 Page 4 of 6 Sincerely, CENSpace Structural, LLC fStructural-Engmeering / Design / Inspection ( Repair A view from the attic access shows the various roof framing members at the interior roof. Diagonal supports connected to the horizontal member shown here provide the interior roof with some additional support while the garage roof franung, having less interior support, exhibited more damage. Three of the diagonal supports observed in the attic are cracked along their lengths. The cracks originate from the notch cut into the top ends to accept the 2x4 horizontal support member. Page 5 of 6 C0.2603.00 Figure 1: Interior roof framing Figure 2: Cracked roof support in attic. CENSpace Structural, LLC Strvctural Engmeering / Design / Inspection / Repair The separation along the wall- ceiling intersection is thought to be unrelated to the other structural roof dauiage observed during the investigation. The porch room was enclosed by the previous owners of the home and the current owners believe that cracks similar to this one have existed in this room addition since they have resided in the home. Inadequate floor construction is suspected as the main cause for the sepazation shown here. The main hip rafter at the garage is badly cracked as shown here. Most of the 2x6 framing supporting the garage roof ties into this hip rafter. This is the area that is noticeably sagging as viewed from the exterior roof. The 2x6 horizontal member supporting this rafter also cracked. C0.2603.00 Page 6 of 6 Figure 3: Garage hip ratter. Figure 4: Enclosed porc6 room. D. ROBIE RESIDENCE SHEET D.1 1. 6,_6.. 2 U Q~ O o d I ~ ° W tt N O J U Z W ~ ~ GARAGE ROOF PARTIAL PLAN SCALE 1 /4"=1'