Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3575 Quail Streeti CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: "I U7_- ��` n o l P1 bg, bey a Job Address: 2 � � &iad If, Permit Number: 101 N1 qy ❑ No one available for inspection: Time iL�M PM Re -Inspection required: Yes 60) When corrections have been made, call four re -inspection at 303-234-5933 Date: Inspector: L qle, Love' f f " DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE City of Wheat Ridge E -Res. Water Heater Replcmnt PERMIT - 201802947 PERMIT NO: 201802947 ISSUED: 11/07/2018 JOB ADDRESS: 3575 Quail St EXPIRES: 11/07/2019 JOB DESCRIPTION: Remove and install 48gallons/60K btus gas water heater located in the mechanical room. *** CONTACTS *** OWNER (303)263-1750 GIMENO FREDERICK E SUB (303)421-2161 Stephen Lanyon 017835 Blue Sky Plumbing *** PARCEL INFO *** ZONE CODE: R-1 / Residential SFR USE: R-3 / Residential SUBDIVISION CODE: 2403 / APPLEWOOD VILLAGES, PROSPECT V BLOCK/LOT#: 0 / *** FEE SUMMARY *** ESTIMATED PROJECT VALUATION: 2,126.88 FEES Hot Water Heater 40.00 Total Valuation 0.00 Use Tax 44.66 ** TOTAL ** 84.66 *** COMMENTS *** *** CONDITIONS *** Both the front and back of this permit are required to be posted on the job site at all times. If the complete permit is not present, inspections WILL NOT be performed. Work shall comply with 2012 IRC & 2017 NEC. Per IRC Sec. R314, smoke detectors are required to be installed in every sleeping room, in hallways outside of sleeping rooms, and on every level of the structure. I, by my signature, do hereby attest that the work to be performed shall comply with all accompanying approved plans and specifications, applicable building codes, and all applicable municipal codes, policies and procedures, and that I am the legal owner or have been authorized by the legal owner of the property and am authorized to obtain this permit and perform the work described and approved in conjunction with this permit. I further attest that I am legally authorized to include all entities named within this document as parties to the work to be performed and that all work to be pert"ormed is disclosed in this document and/or its' accompanying approved plans and specifications. Signature of OWNER or CONTRACTOR (Circle one) Date I . This pen -nit was issued based on the information provided in thepermit application and accompanying plans and specifications and is subject to the compliance with those documents, and all applicable statutes, ordinances, regulations, policies and procedures. 2. This permit shall expire 365 days after the date of issuance regardless of activity. Requests for extension must be made in writing and received prior to the date of expiration. An extension of no more than 180 days made be granted at the discretion of the Chief Building Official and may be subject to a fee equal to one-half of the original permit fee. 3. If this permit expires, a new permit may be required to be obtained. Issuance of a new permit shall be subject to the standard requirements, fees and procedures for approval of any new permit. Re -issuance or extension of expired permits is at the sole discretion of the Chief Building Official and is not guaranteed. 4. No work of any manner shall be performed that shall results in a change of the natural flow of water without prior and specific approval. 5. The permit holder shall notify the Building and Inspection Services Division in accordance with established policy of all required inspections and shall not proceed or conceal work without written approval of such work from the Building and Inspection Services Division. 6. The i mice or gr ti of a permit shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, an violation of any provision of any appl a co e or an rdinance or regulation of this jurisdiction. Approval of work is subject to field inspection. Signature of Chief Building Official Date REQUESTS MUST BE MADE BY 11:59PM ANY BUSINESS DAY FOR INSPECTION THE FOLLOWING BUSINESS DAY. Laaenia Reimer From: no-reply@ci.wheatri dge.co.us Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2018 4:16 PM To: CommDev Permits Subject: Online Form Submittal: Residential Water Heater Replacement Permit Application Categories: Gina Residential Water Heater Replacement Permit Application This application is exclusively for RESIDENTIAL REPLACEMENT WATER HEATERS - LIKE FOR LIKE ONLY. YOU MUST ATTACH A VALID CREDIT CARD AUTHORIZATION FORM IN ORDER FOR THE PERMIT TO BE PROCESSED. Your Permit will be emailed to the email address provided below once it is processed. THIS APPLICATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A PERMIT. DO NOT BEGIN WORK UNTIL PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED. Is this application for a Yes replacement water heater like for like?` PROPERTY INFORMATION' Property Address 3575 Quail St Property Owner Name Fred Jimeno Property Owner Phone 303-263-1750 Number (enter WITH dashes, eg 303-123-4567) Property Owner Email fdgimeno@msn.com Address Attach Credit Card scan0276.pdf Authorization Form - **DO NOT ATTACH RANDOM DOCUMENTS** CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Contractor Business Blue Sky Plumbing & Heating Name 1 Contractor's License Number (This is a 5 or 6 digit number for the City of Wheat Ridge) Contractor Phone Number (enter WITH dashes, eg 303-123-4567) Contractor Address (Primary address of your business) 17835 303-421-2161 4765 Independence St Contractor Email Address tommiw@blueskyplumbing.com Retype Contractor Email Address DESCRIPTION OF WORK Number of gallons Is the water heater GAS or ELECTRIC? If GAS, enter # of BTUs If electric, enter n/a Where is the water heater located (for example, basement, crawlspace, etc)? Project Value (contract value or cost of ALL materials and labor) tommiw@blueskyplumbing.com 48 Gas 60000 mechanical room 2126.88 SIGNATURE OF UNDERSTANDING AND AGREEMENT I assume fill Yes responsibility for compliance with applicable City of Wheat Ridge codes and ordinances for work under any permit issued based on this application. I understand that work Yes may not begin on this i property until a permit has been issued and posted on the property. I certify that I have been Yes authorized by the legal owner of the property to submit this application and to perform the work described above. I attest that everything Yes stated in this application is true and correct and that falsifying information in this application is an act of fraud and may be punishable by fine, imprisonment, or both. Person Applying for Tommi Whittenburg Permit Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser. PERMIT: Z��%p%� ADDRESS:JOB CODE: INSPECTION RECORD Inspection online form: http://www.ci.wheatridge.co.us/inspection Cancellations must be submitted via the online form before 8 a.m. the day of the inspection Inspections will not be performed unless this card is posted on the project site Request an inspection before MIDNIGHT (11:59 PM) to receive an inspection the following business Foundation Inspections Date Inspector Initials Comments 102 Caissons / Piers 103 Footing / P.E. Letter 104 Foundation Setback Cert. 105 Stem Walls 106 Foundation wall Insulation Do Not Pour Concrete Prior To Approval Of The Above Inspections Underground / Slab Inspections Date Inspector Initials Comments 201 Electrical / Cable/ Conduit 202 Sewer Underground Int. 203 Sewer Underground Ext. 204 Plumbing Underground Int. 205 Plumbing Underground Ext. 206 Water Underground Do Not Cover Underground or Below / In -Slab Work Prior To Approval Of The Above Inspections Rough Inspection Date Inspector Initials Comments 301 Rough Framing 302 Wall Sheathing 303 Roof Sheathing 304 Sheer Inspection 305 Insulation 306 Mid -Roof 307 Metal/ Lath / Stucco 308 Rough Electrical Residential 309 Rough Electrical Commercial 310 Electrical Meter Residential 311 Electrical Meter Commercial 312 Temp. Const. Meter 313 Rough Plumbing Residential 314 Rough Plumbing Commercial 315 Shower Pan SEE OVER FOR ADDITIONAL INSPECTIONS Rough Inspection (continued) Date Inspector Initials Comments 316 Rough Mechanical Residential 317 Rough Mechanical Commercial 318 Boiler / Furnace 319 Hot water tank 320 Drywall screw and Nail 321 Moisture board / shower walls Rough Grading EMiscellaneous �� " l�' `[� 320 NCTA ,us f. CVer. %t -1D(1. Co►^Sut(; �-2A,(6r Final Inspections Date Inspector Initials Comments 402 Gas Meter Release 403 Final Electrical Residential 404 Final Electrical Commercial 405 Final Mechanical Residential 406 Final Mechanical Commercial 407 Final Plumbing Residential 408 Final Plumbing Commercial 409 Final Roof �� " l�' `[� 320 NCTA ,us f. CVer. %t -1D(1. Co►^Sut(; �-2A,(6r 410 Final Window/Door S P+�.► 411 Landscape/Park/Planning Inspections from these entities shall be requested one week in advance. For landscaping and parking inspections please call 303-235-2846 For ROW and drainage inspections please call 303-235-2861 For fire inspections please contact the Fire Protection District for your project. 412 Row/Drainage/Public Works 413 Flood plain Inspection 414 Fire Insp. / Fire Protection 415 Public Works Final 416 Storm Water Mgmt. 417 Zoning Final Inspection 418 Building Final Inspection Note: All items must be completed and approved by Planning, Public Works, Fire and Building before a Certificate of Occur ancy is issued. Approval of the Final Building Inspection does not constitute authorization of occupancy. For Low Voltage permits please be sure that rough inspections are completed by the Fire District and Electrical low voltage by the Building Division. The City of Wheat Ridge Third Party Form Check List Property Address�&,��// Permit Number Permit Issued Date Owner Information Property Owner Information MV Y /h Property Owner Addresses F?—sx' Vit' Inspection Company (a' Inspector Name Inspector Contact info. C lzb I NO — Inspector Statement and Acknowledgement * I hearby acknowledge the roof I am inspecting is 6/12 or over all roofs that are under 6/12 must be inspected by the City of Wheat Ridge Buiding Dept. * I hearby acknowledge the roofing system for the referenced building has been inspected and found to be in compliance with the minimum requirements of the 2012 IRC and 2012 IBC as well as all City of Wheat Ridge Policies and Procedure and Manufacturer' recommendation Inspector: __j Date: / /{ Property vwner Statement OT ACKnowiea ement *1 hearby acknowledge that I am e o n r of the building referenced above and I give my consent for the listed third- y i p ction company to perform my roof inspe tion in lieu of the City of Wheat Ri B I ' g Division inspection. Propery Owner/ Agent: Date: This original document as well as the roofing check list, must be submitted to the Chief Building Ofi'tcal within seven days of the final inspection. Drop off in person Submit via Email Permit counter 2nd floor Kcook c!'.wr eatridge.co.us 7500 W. 29th Ave Wheat Ridge CO 80033 Drafted Date: 7/26/17 Please add note to reverse side The City of Wheat Ridge Inspection Check List notes Mid -Roof _Roof Inspection • N/A 0 Pass ❑ Fail Structural roof components • N/A Xpass G Fail 0 Verify that no more than 2 layers of shingles exist c N/A Pass Fail Pass E3 Fall dashing for roof and walls • N/A If new sheathing is installed verify that it is listed in the 0 Pass C. Fail permit description (Valuation must be adjusted) Verify sheathing nail pattern ( See policy & Proceedures) XN/A o Pass 0 Fail Crickets and saddles where needed XN/A 0 1 Pass 13 Fail 0 N/A � Pass 0 Fall Verify B vent must have boot same gauge as pipe Cl N/A] Pass 0 Fail ` Verify vent caps � Pass Q Fail Verify no flashings are damaged or rusted R N/A o Fail Step flashing shall be min. of 4x4 piece per shingle M N/A Pass c Fail Verify scuppers allow for proper drainage 0 N/A Pass 0 Fail Ice and water shield 2' in heated wall spaces Ct N/A Pass Underlayments must follow 2012 IRC / 2012 IBC © N/A Pass 0 Fail 0 Fail Verify roof slope for proper drainage 0 N/A );1 Pass Pass 11 Fail Dripedge shall have min of 2" overlap 0 N/A 0 Fail Dripedge should extend down min 2" pastro f of deck 0 N/A Pass Q Dripedge shall be mechanicaly fastened 0 N/A Pass Fail 90 LB roll roofing shall not be applied to roof slopes P, N/A F1 Pass 0 Fail less than 2:12 slope: Exception, detached garages, patios, carports, open on three sides with min. slope of 1:12 Modified Bitumen, EPDM, TPO min slope 1/4:12 slope G N/A 0 Pass 0 Fail Above roof insulation R-25 Q N/A ,,Pass Et Fail Below roof residential R-38 * N/A _° Pass 17 Fail Below roof commercial R-32 * N/A k Pass 0 Fail Modified Bitumen, EPDM, TPO min slope 1/4:12 slope )R(N/A R Pass 0 Fail be installed in accordance with the manufacturers must specifications- Must have manufactures letter of warranty with the address on the letter for final inspection Metal Roof Shingles Ranuirements Metal roof shingles shalt not be installed on slope less N/A R Pass 0 Fail A 3:12 Metal valley flashing shall be the same material as roof N/A 13 Pass 0 Fail Metal valley flashing shall extend a min of 8" from the Jr� N/A a Pass Cl Fail 6 centerline with a min. of 3/4 " high splash diverter rib built-in at the flow line with sections overlapping a a min. of 4" The Roofs Requirements 0 Fail Clay and concrete tile shall have a min. 2-102:12 slope /X N/A 0 Pass `�� Slopes 4:12 and under require double underlayment The City of Wheat Ridge Inspection Check List notes Mid -Roof Notes Company Name: �•�'� ,,���,� �3 �.s�-���� Inspector signature:—' Date of Inspection: •_7!-17 d/A a Pass D Fail d/A Pass Q Fail r/A pass 0 Fail UA Pass Cl Fait 13 Pass A Fall d1A VA VA VA H/A 't/A ►1/A VA WA WA Y/A v/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 Paz D Fail O Pass U W Pan Q Fail PM E3 Fail 4- passQ Fall Pass 0 Fail Pass a fall ,{ :Pass Cl Fall ' p` Q Fall The City of Wheat Ridge Inspection Check List notes Final Roof Structural roof components Verify that no more than 2 layers of shingles exist Flashing for roof and walls If new sheathing is installed verify that it is listed in the permit description (Valuation must be adjusted) Verify sheahing nail pattern ( See policy & Proceedures) Crickets and saddles where needed Verify B vent must have boot same gauge as pipe Verify vent caps Verify no flashings are damaged or rusted Step flashing shall be min. of 4A piece per shingle Verify scuppers allow for proper drainage Ice and water shield 2' In heated wall spaces Underlayments must follow 2012 IRC / 2012 IBC Pass 0 Fail Verify roof slope- for proper drainage Pass 0 Fail Dripedge shall have min of 2" overlap Pass a Fall Dripedge should extend dowry, min 2" past roof deck 13 Fail Dripedge shall be mechanically fastened 12" OC Pass cl Fall 90 LB roil roofing shall not be applied to roof mopes �s PaSs less than 2:12 slope: Exception, detached garages, patfios, carports, open on three sides VAM min. slope of 1:12 o Pass G Fall Modified Bitumen, EPDM, TPO min slope 4/4:12 slope c Pass a Fall Above roof insulation R-25 13 Pass a Fall Below roof residential R-38 ra Pass o Fail Below roof commercial R-32 a Fail Modified Bitumen, EPDM, TPO rain slope 1/4:12 slope p Pass, must be installed in accordance with the manufacturers specifications- Must have manufactures letter of warranty with the address on the letter for final inspection Metal Rots# Ahlogigs &eouirem$n#s Metal roof shingles shall not be installed on slope less 0 PM 0 Fail 3:12 Wmtaj -Va4wy J%sh1m%ti ed be't'he same matentl as roof o POSS a Fall Fall Petal valley flashing shall extend a min of 8" from the o PM 0 centerline with a min. of 3/4 " high splash diverter rib built-in at the flow line with sections overlapping a a min. of 4" ,jlle l� R,ec�uiremerrts 0 Fall Clay and concrete Ole shall have a min. 2-1/2:12 slope o Pass Slopes 4:12 and under require double underlayrnerd The City of Wheat Ridge inspection Check List notes Final Roof Notes Company Name: Inspector signature: Date of Inspection: ► ' , City of Wheat Ridge Residential Roofing PERMIT - 201707406 PERMIT NO: 201707406 ISSUED: 09/19/2017 JOB ADDRESS: 3575 Quail ST EXPIRES: 09/19/2018 JOB DESCRIPTION: Residential Re -roof to install GAF asphalt shingles - 63 sq Pitch = 12/12 *** CONTACTS *** OWNER (303)263-1750 GIMENO FREDERICK E SUB (303)346-8285 James Cambron 100103 JBC Contracting, LLC *** PARCEL INFO *** ZONE CODE: R-1 / Residential SFR USE: R-3 / Residential SUBDIVISION CODE: 2403 / APPLEWOOD VILLAGES, PROSPECT V BLOCK/LOT#: 0 / *** FEE SUMMARY *** ESTIMATED PROJECT VALUATION: 34,618.00 FEES Total Valuation 0.00 Use Tax 726.98 Permit Fee 557.05 ** TOTAL ** 1,284.03 *** COMMENTS *** *** CONDITIONS *** Effective December 1, 2014, asphalt shingle installations require an approved midroof inspection, conducted when 25-75 percent of the roof covering is installed, prior to final approval. Installation of roof sheathing (new or overlay) is required on the entire roof when spaced or board sheathing with ANY gap exceeding one half inch exists. Sheathing and mid -roofs may be called in at the same time, one hundred percent of the sheathing must be complete and 25-75 percent of the mid -roof may be complete. Asphalt shingles are required to be fastened to the roof deck with a minimum of 6 nails per shingle. Ice and water shield is required. Eave and rake metal is required. A ladder extending 3 feet above the roof eave and secured in place is required to be provided for all roof inspections. Roof ventilation is required to comply with applicable codes and/or manufacturer installation instructions, whichever is more stringent. In order to pass a final inspection of elastomeric or similar type roof coverings, a letter of inspection and approval from the manufacturer technical representative stating that "the application of the roof at (project address) has been applied in accordance with the installation instruction for (roof material brand name) roof covering" is required to be on site at the time of final inspection. Midroof & Final Roof inspections for ROOFS 6/12 PITCH & OVER: 3rd party inspection will be required, the 3rd party inspection report AND THE ORIGINAL PERMIT CARD needs to be dropped off to the Permit Desk at the City of Wheat Ridge. The report MUST BE SIGNED by the Homeowner. City of Wheat Ridge Residential Roofing PERMIT - 201707406 PERMIT NO: 201707406 ISSUED: 09/19/2017 JOB ADDRESS: 3575 Quail ST EXPIRES: 09/19/2018 JOB DESCRIPTION: Residential Re -roof to install GAF asphalt shingles - 63 sq Pitch = 12/12 I, by my signature, do hereby attest that the work to be performed shall comply with all accompanying approved plans and specifications= applicable building codes, and all applicable municipal codes, policies and procedures, and that I am the legal owner or have been authorized by the leg,al owner of the property and am authorized to obtain this permit and perform the work described and approved in conjunction with thispperm . I further att st tha am legally authorized to include alI entities named within this document as parties to the work to be },rforr anfl ork t ie performed is disclosed in this document and/cit its' accompanying approved plans and specifications. Sigfiature of OWNER or CONTRACTOR (Circle one) bate 1. This permit was issued based on the information provided in the permit application and accompanying Flans and specifications and is subject to the compliance with those documents, and all applicable statutes, ordinances, regulations, policies and procedures. 2. This permit shall expire 365 days after the date of issuance regardless of activity. Requests for extension must be made in writing, and received prior to the date of expiration. An extension of no more than 180 days made be granted at the discretion of the Chief Building Official and may be subject to a fee equal to one-half of the original permit fee. 3. If this permit expires, a new permit may be required to be obtained. Issuance of a new permit shall be subject to the standard requirements, fees androcedures for approval of any new permit. Re -issuance or extension of expired permits is at the sole discretion of the Chief Building Off-cial and is not guaranteed. 4. No work of any manner shall be performed that shall results in a changeof the natural flow of water without prior and specific approval. 5. The permit holder shall notify the Building and Inspection Services Division in accordance with established policy of all required inspections and shall not proceed or conceal work without written approval of such work from the Building and Inspection Services Division. 6. The issuance or granting of a permit shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, an violation of any provision of any applicab co or any ordmanc or re ullat n of this jurisdiction. Approval of work is subject to f any inspection. 'k N Signature of Chief Building Official Date REQUESTS MUST BE MADE BY 11:59PM ANY BUSINESS DAY FOR INSPECTION THE FOLLOWING BUSINESS DAY. Dane Lovett Z c ��y q o O From: no-reply@ci.wheatridge.co.us Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 7:22 AM To: CommDev Permits Subject: Online Form Submittal: Residential Roofing Permit Application Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Residential Roofing Permit Application This application is exclusively for new permits for residential roofs and for licensed contractors only. This type of permit is ONLY being processed online --do not come to City Hall to submit an application in person. Permits are processed and issued in the order they are received and due to the volume of requests, time to process varies and is subject to change. YOU WILL BE CONTACTED WHEN YOUR PERMIT IS READY FOR PICK-UP AND WILL BE GIVEN A SPECIFIC DATE AND TIME WINDOW TO COMPLETE THE TRANSACTION. You will be notified if your contractor's license or insurance has expired, and you may update those documents at the time you are issued your permit. For all other requests: Homeowners wishing to obtain a roofing permit must apply for the permit in person at City Hall. Revisions to existing permits (for example, to add redecking) must be completed in person at City Hall. All other non -roofing permits must be completed in person at City Hall. The Building Division will be open from 7:30-10:30 a.m., Monday through Friday to process these types of requests. THIS APPLICATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A PERMIT. DO NOT BEGIN REROOFING UNTIL PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED. Is this application for a Yes residential roof? How many dwelling units Single Family Home are on the property? PROPERTY INFORMATION f=� L 1/ Property Address 3575 Quail Ct Property Owner Name Fred Gimeno Property Owner Phone 303-263-1750 Number (enter WITH dashes, eg 303-123-4567) 7- Property Owner Email Address Do you have a signed contract to reroof this property? Applications cannot be submitted without an executed contract attached below. Attach Copy of Executed Contract Field not completed. Yes 17-150 Starr-Gimeno Agreement.pdf CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Contractor Business JBC Contracting, LLC Name Contractor's License 100103 Number (This is a 5 or 6 digit number for the City of Wheat Ridge) Contractor Phone Number (enter WITH dashes, eg 303-123-4567) Contractor Address (Primary address of your business) 720-275-0077 4504 Ketchwood Cir Highlands Ranch CO 80130 Contractor Email Address jim.c@jbccontractingllc.com Retype Contractor Email Address DESCRIPTION OF WORK jim.c@jbccontractingllc.com TOTAL SQUARES of 63 the entire scope of work: Project Value (contract 34618 value or cost of ALL materials and labor) Are you re -decking the roof? Is the permit for a flat roof, pitched roof, or No , Pitched roof (2:12 pitch or greater) 2 both? (check all that apply) What is the specific pitch of the PITCHED roof? How many squares are part of the PITCHED roof? Describe the roofing materials for the PITCHED roof: Type of material for the PITCHED roof: Provide any additional detail here on the description of work. (Is this for a house or garage? Etc) 12/12 63 GAF Armorshield II Asphalt Re -roof complete, 12/12 pitch SIGNATURE OF UNDERSTANDING AND AGREEMENT I assume full Yes responsibility for compliance with applicable City of Wheat Ridge codes and ordinances for work under any permit issued based on this application. I understand that this Yes application is NOT a permit. I understand I will be contacted by the City to pay for and pick up the permit for this property. I understand that work Yes may not begin on this property until a permit has been issued and posted on the property. I certify that I have been Yes authorized by the legal owner of the property to 3 submit this application and to perform the work described above. I attest that everything Yes stated in this application is true and correct and that falsifying information in this application is an act of fraud and may be punishable by fine, imprisonment, or both. Name of Applicant James M Cambron Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser. i BC MWI ; c GUTTA 9LOG�A%J.... _ )BC CONTRACTING. LLC E 8. 4504 Ketchwood Circle, Highlands Ranch CO 80130 jbc&cnvrn°ofingspecialists.Can -�- 303-346-3295^ e� '^7 R=.p2 7.Q Phone !G7_"' - �-7v �' Z_ >� L� Name f�P M (H/C/W) ("cm Job Address35'�S L f0ty. State) W&Y--A" (t-0 k -O Mi.)'TY)Q3�____ Billing Address 6*Y"E- _ (City. State) (iso) UWe the owner agree to pay upon Complexion the sum of C Total of Insurance Allowance i ! Permit Fee ft Amount Sl, Email Source Upgrade/Extra: $ SCOPE AND SERVICES FOR LABOR & MATERIAL, TERMS AND CONDITIONS (please read entire docaurtatt carefully) Upgrade/Extra: C Repair roof with ,� Rexrvw roof viri Shingles (Type) it7 ) Marwfaamire W i� Tear of # L-aMaterial " Install Feil Ice and Water Shield $- feel upslope from cave La Re -Flash Cylcy 4e k)rlights NewV � New Vol � e of Ridge J.& ITGalvanized Nails ReplacePlunimBJ� Paint roof stacks to mats j J►� (Pr'f'-f 2 C�YS Install I ft Drip Edge C can InswI Drip Edge @ gabks Vr- Vcats: Old New 4- Y. Patio flat roof Year guarantee on labor JBC Contracting ib ft11168h SII material and labor y �,..g�� Permit fufulrshed by JBC Contrwft Fsnsn-kS 4A- wed CE Germ -up & haul off all trash f vin roof Ron yard with magnetic roller Gutters cleaned of roofJng debris Soffit/Roof Joint Flashings Protect Deck, Plants, old Grounds BeautY Course at Headwalls Replace Step Flashing at Sidewalls Association approval by own«Appro _ 5eaml Upgrade/Extra: S Property Oester is-%YJ Is not- intending to make payment from the proceeds of a property and astiatty W-- polky dales, L 1/we agree to rembe 16C Contract ft ILC 02q to roptaca asd/m' repide all Item listed w thb agreement sof the property bleatifled above (Proper", provided my Insmsoce company aOPtorse payment to too to haee the uritis 600es.1 authorize IRC to discuss the Property and work heeded with my insuranu wmpaay. Upon the Insurance companys approval of the damages and cost orrepaim 16C may begin work on the Propetty.I will pay the dedtMib on my Insurance pocky to W- IBC cannot waive, rebate, discount, or pay my dodwdbr. My espows will rat oaaW the amotat of the hMrance po0cy deductible for work agreed upon between my Insurance company and INC taaxpt that 1 matt pay for nay atpBrades ta tr Wort[ or matallah that will be osed. Any alteration or deviation from the above spedlimRfaos involving arts cwt will be po7f0rmed only npoa written orders and will beamo an antra ehago ower and above the esdmgft. 18C may file a supplemental claim for payment for material or labor increases or N the Insurance company's moasuremmm and Indusions are incorrect I agree to prorMe on necessary documentation for the claim Including all documentation m &c1l tau payment from my insurance Company and mortgage company. 1 an responsible for submitting W obtatNng approval from my home owners' association before any work starts. I will carry lire, tornado and all other necessary insurance. 11 agree that the Property will secure the payment due under this agreement and IBC may put a lien agamet dw Property Nall amounts due under this agreement are oat paid when due. This agreement shah become binding only upon me and either iK or Its authortzed agent signing this agreement or upon commescemeat of the work This agreement contains the entire understanding between me and JBC, and no other mderstandinSc verbal or Otherwise, s1aaU be binding nmless In writing and signed by both me and JBC or our agreement is evidenced by email or 1= 3, iBCs labor warranty don not cover damage to roofs caused by tightening gab (50 NPif), burricana tornado, hail, impact of forelgu objects or other vio)ant storm or casualty, or damage to roofs due to settlement dil"mr11011, failure or craeldng of the roofdeck waUs, or toundattora The labor ww anty will be bull and void N the agreemeet Is not paid In tali when due. The labor warranty Is 1100-ttansfembis. no material warranty Is 0011 -transferable unless otherwim stated by the manufacturer. 4. ISC will ensure the material listed In this aVv mmt Is what Is Installed. All work will be completed in a workmanUe manner according to standard practices In Colorado. tabor and material warranty covers roof only. The labor warranty is limited to roof issues caused by incorrectly installed roofing materials, but dots not include repair car reimbursement for mold or mildew or for water damage to the tot Brim of the home, PIC Is not responsible for any damage to Concrete or driveways. 03S - T olOr S. final payment will be due upon substantial completion of the root I will pay a Nunn Burge of murIspOtsw 18a R drawi ed 1.5% per month on the full amount w paid when due. I will pay all of)80s espouses of coUeetloo, ' Extra Work including reasonable attorney fees, and $50 for each returned check, 6. IBC may wtthdrew N I do not accept this proposal within _ days leo mosey wo be Collected rots after 72 bours from whoa I signed MU agreement sen4 at tinct optbo, saber the matefUls have beet delivered or the majortty of to work stated in"agreement Inas been Imura= Co Lt Claim 8 couple" i MAY rtsand this tngteement wrd fa 72 hours of the dote 1 dgned this agreemeet or within 72 boars of When 1 receive written notice from my insurance company that the claim for Comet k% payment for roofing work en the property Is denied to whole or In part except that this does not apply when the insurance company denies, in whole or in part, a claim related to a request for supplemental services U the damage requiring the supplemental rooftng serAm could not have been _ reasonably Poreseeo as a necessary and related roofing acmce at IAs time of the initial rooting inspection or the date this agreement was signed. To resetnd, 1 may mail by US. man, personally deliver, tax or email the notice to IDC 7. within 10 days after 1 rescind the agreement IRC shallrsbnt to roe any payment or depoeria or S Date evidences of indebtedness for the work an the property, except IK may keep ill or a p0mon of any payments or deposits made by me to compensate 16C for roofing work wwalty performed on the I have rete v¢d a wtrvut copy of JBCs Insurance Cerdfieate (yam)property in ■ workmanbia manner. J8C will have ail common law remedies available m k to collect any amounts is believes remain due to It INSPECTION RECORD OccupancylTVpe 'ViNSPECTION LINE: (303) 234 -5933 Inspections will not be made unless this card is posted on the building site Call by 3:00 PM to receive inspection the following business day. 1 C::4- e A9n 44 L INSPECTOR MUST SIGN ALL SPACES PERTAINING TO THIS JOB FOUNDATION INSPECTIONS DATE INSPECTOR INITIALS COMMENTS: Footings /Caissons Drywall Screw Stemwall / (CEG) Concrete Encased Ground Reinforcing or Monolithic Electrical Weatherproof/ French Drain Plumbing Sewer Service Lines Mechanical Water Service Lines ..Roof CONCRETE SLAB FLOOR Electrical (Undergrou Plumbing (Underground) Heating (Underground) ROUGHS Lath / Wall tie Mid -Roof Electrical Service Rough Electric Rough Plumbing Gas Piping Rough Mechanical uniii.�rKa -a�? Tn RP SIGNFn PRIOR TO PROCFFOING Framing Insulation Drywall Screw FINALS Electrical Plumbing Mechanical ..Roof Building Final Fire Department R.O.W & Drainage INSPECTIONS FOR PLANNING & ZONING, FIRE AND PUBLICE WORKS SHOULD BE GALLED AT LEAST ONE WEEK PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTIONS. Parking & Landscaping "NOTE: ALL ITEMS MUST BE COMPLETED AND APPROVED BY PLANNING AND ZONING, BUILDING AND PUBLIC WORKS BEFORE A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY IS ISSUED. FINAL INSPECTION BY THE BUILDING DIVISION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AUTHORIZATION OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY NOR PERMISSION FOR OCCUPANCY. OCCUPANCY NOT PERMITTED UNTIL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY IS ISSUED PROTECT THIS CARD FROM THE WEATHER ♦ i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235 -2855 Office • (303) 237 -8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: �N*e- 400i Job Address: m5 Q q/L �f Permit Number: O92L1 q6 i s s k ❑ No one available for inspection: Time ° . 5� AN Re- Inspection required: Yes C' "When corrections have been made, call for r at 303 - 234 - 5933 re Date: Inspector: "y DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE ♦ 4' CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 235-2857 Fax INSPE TION NOTICE ^t c Inspection Type: ,L MJ). Job Address: u " Permit Number: r, rr ^/`'-rCC r r\ ❑ No one available for inspection 'me AM/PAtI~ Re-Inspection required: Yes Ne When corrections have been made, Gaff for rafn ec}t~fs~on 11 f 30fF-2 S33 ~ " frC 3 Date: Inspector: DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE City of Wheat Ridge Residential Roofing PERMIT - 092436 s` PERMIT NO: 092436. ISSUED: 09/16/2009 JOB ADDRESS: 3575 QUAIL ST EXPIRES: 03/15/2010 DESCRIPTION: T /o: Install 65 sqs CT ':landmark special, lifetime ** CONTACTS * ** owner 303/860 -0697 Fred /Donna Gimeno go 303/425-7531 John Borfitz 019983 J &(K Roofing Inc.' ** PARCEL INFO ** ` ZONE'. CODE: R-1 USE: R -3 `.'SUBDIVISION:` 0666 'BLOCK /:LOT #: 0/ ** FEE SUMMARY ** ESTIMATED PROJECT VALUATION: 24,433.00 n, FEES _Permit Fee ...508.70 'otal Valuation Tse Tax '* TOTAL * *' )nditions:: nail installation :& mid -roof inspect lama 1/,2 of an inch apart.' requires p tter shield required from eave edge t asurements shown, and .allegations made are accurz plication and that I assume full responsibility if plicable Wheat: Ridge Ordinances, for work under '. t gnature of contractor /owner This permit was issued in accordance with the ps State of Colorado and to the Zoning Regulations.' 439.791 L, 009.4 T required. Board sheathing spaced more good overlay on entire roof. Ice and d' inside exterior walls. s 9." this permit application are accurate, and do: not violate applicable nit. Plans subject to field F inspection. date 2. Article Number 11111111'-n6o 3901 9e44 6338 9176 37ServiceType CERTIflEDMAI_=_ 4. Re$tnCIeo unnvo~y: 1. Article Mr. & Mrs. Frederick Gimeno 3575 Quail St. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Form te oP Ueirvery Si9neture ~es la tlelivery atldress tliHerent irom item 14 0 . tl VES, entar tlellvery addrass below: , l---~- ~r CIty Of Wheat~dge MMUNI7Y DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29q' Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 e: .sus.zs3.L5D i Mazch 20, 2008 Mr. and Mrs. Frederick Gimeno Certified ' 3575 Quail Street 7160 3901 9844 6338 8176 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 SENDERS O. D RE: 3575 Quail Street Single Family Residence Mr. and Mrs. Gimeno, In consideration of a resolution of the ongoing issues involving the occupancy of the residential structure at the above address without the required Certificate of Occupancy, the Building Division of the City of Wheat Ridge has taken the following actions: 1. As a result of the failure to comply with Flood Regulatory District elevation requirements, the City of Wheat Ridge will not issue a certificate of compliance for the structure. 2. The Ciry of Wheat Ridge will document and retain in its' permanent public records information relating to the Certificate of Occupancy and lack of compliance with the Flood Regulatory District regulations. Enclosed is a Certificate of Occupancy for your residence at the above address. Included on the certificate is notation that the property in not in compliance with City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Code Section 26-806, D(1), which requires that the lowest finished floor of the structure be elevated to a minimum of one foot above base flood elevation. Based on the above actions, the Building Division shall consider this matter closed. Should you have any questions or require any additional information regarding these actions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, John C. S umacher, Jr., CBO Chief Building Official Office (303) 235-2853 Faac (303) 235-2857 ischumacher&ci wheatridge.co.us www.ci.w heatr idge.co.u s COPY CERmIVicatlg oF occvPANCx Citp,of Wfi-eat Ridge 2500 Td 29th Ave WlZeate Rid'ge C0 80Q-33,Permit# 060383 Issued: 03/20/08 Stipulatibns: The,property is npt in campliance w"1th Ci:ty of Wheat }2idge Muiiicipal Code Sec. 36-~806, L7(i)i WkriinY3 Y'2quir¢s that tYie low8st finished floor eyf the structure be elevated to-a minimum of ohe"foot above htxse flocrdelerration'. This Certifi6ate v€rifkes-that~the bitilding constructcdand(' or the use proposed of the building and/or gremzses, under thea-bave germit~nucriberand on property describedbelow.,~ flaes complywith t~k~e Wheat kidge Buil~lang Cpde anddevelopment staridaxds at the zone district iri which it is located and may be occupaed. All other licensing requirementsfor the City muse,bE me~C. Site Address: 35'15;Qua3.1 'St Parcel Number: 39-282-05-110 pwnes : Fred &'Dorina, C.'imeho~ ContracCor:; Fnr the Fo11ow7ing PuYpoSe: Res. New SFR Cod .Editions Nb change shall be made i,n the USE of; 2003 ICC/2005 N2C thi$,building Nzithout-priOr notict 2003 ICCJ2002 NEC and a new Certificate bf Occupancy 1997 UBC/2002 iaTEC from,tl`ie City of W}leat Ridge. Sprinkler, y~tain ~r--- C i f B i ding Inspector Zoriing Administrator CERmIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY City of Wheat Ridge 7500 W 29th Ave Wheat Ridge CO 80033 Permit# 060383 Issued: 03/20/08 Stipulations: The property is not in compliance with City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Code Sec. 26-806, D(1), which requires that the lowest finished floor of the structure be elevated to a minimum of one foot above base flood elevation. This certificate verifies that the building constructed and/ or the use proposed of the building and/or premises, under the above permit number and on property described below, does comply with the Wheat Ridge Building Code and develapment standards of the zone district in which it is located and may be occupied. All other licensing requirements for the City must be met. Site Address: 3575 Quail St Parcel Number: 39-282-05-110 Owner: Fred & Donna Gimeno Contractor: For the Following Purpose: Res. New SFR Cod Editions NO change shall be made in the USE of 2003 ICC/2005 NEC this building without prior notice 2003 ICC/2002 NEC and a new Certificate of Occupancy 1997 UBC/2002 NEC from the City of Wheat Ridge. Sprinkler ystem C i f B i dinq Inspector Zoning Ad nistrator City of : W heat ge CC7MMUNITY ~6V1il,OPMEN`f City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29'h Ave. March 20, 2008 Mr. and Mrs. Frederick Gimeno V✓heat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303235.2846 F: 303.2352857 3575 Quail Street Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 RE: 3575 Quail Street Single Family Residence Mr. and Mrs. Gimeno, In consideration of a resolution of the ongoing issues involving the occupancy of the residential structure at the above address without the required Certificate of Occupancy, the Building Division of the City of Wheat Ridge has taken the following actions As a result of the failure to comply with Flood Regulatory District elevation requirements, the City of Wheat Ridge will not issue a certificate of compliance for the structure. 2. The City of Wheat Ridge will document and retain in its' permanent public records information relating to the Certificate of Occupancy and lack of compliance with the Flood Regulatory District regulations. 3. Enclosed is a Certificate of Occupancy for your residence at the above address. Included on the certificate is notation that the property in not in compliance with City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Code Section 26-806, D(1), which requires that the lowest finished floor of the structure be elevated to a minimum of one foot above base flood elevation. Based on the above actions, the Building Division shall consider this matter closed. Should you have any questions or require any additional information regarding these actions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, John C. Schumacher, Jr., CBO Chief Building Official Office (303) 235-2853 Fax (303) 235-2857 ischwnlcher a ci wlieahid~4e.co.us rvNt w.ci.w hea tri dge. co. u s Date: Q-4t I o g A Certiflcate of Occupancy or Completion has been requested for: ADoarss: ~35-75 G-Lkxid a,. PURPOS[ OP 8TRUCTURE:2) [D~ Building Department Approval: Remarks: tJ/'7?f ,,2,T7 Zoning Approval:_ Remarks: Public Works Approvi Remarks: Fire Marshall Approw (If Applicable) Remarks: 13- z i-v8 N-Y /.i 3/2 - / Sanitation District Approval: (If Applicable) Remarks: Water District Approv (If Applicable) Remarks: INSPECTION RECORD 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 (303) 235-3855 r4rInsoection Line,_(303) 2345933 inspections will not be made unless this card is posted on the building site 24 Hours notice required for inspections ~l, ( k , t.,; ; ,N Job Address - . T e Occu anc Building Permit No. c Date Issued Yp p y Owner Contractor Contractor Address ' INSPECTOR MUST SIGN ALL SPACES PERTAINING TO THIS .JOB FOUNDATION INSPECTIONS DATE APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL INSPECTOR INITIALS COMMENTS: Footings/Caissons Sterrnvall , •1 Reinfacing a' Monolithic Weatnerproof / French Drain Water/Sewer Service Lines S SLAB FIOOR ~ ~ , ii ' f : _ ~ , i. • i pec6tical (Underground) Plumbing (Undergrour.d) Heating (Underground) . __=j o~~.Cr. cn TL7J71~ktL~~.)1lcinc .~A/P*i..• -Iei Electrical Service CT1 , W~71n C?7 vv ~ ~ ' _ Rough Electric % c50 Rough Plumbing • 177 Air Test Gas Pipiag t/y-, ~ Rough Mechanical Ffamilg Roofing ' Insulatan Drywall Screw FiNaLs E'lecdical Plumbing _ Mgchanical Frame / interior Finis - ~ R.O.W 8 Drainage F're Department parking & Landscaping "*NOTE: ADDITIONAL INSPECTIONS / COMMENTS ON BACK - OCCUPANCY NOT PERMITTED UNTIL VERTilmcP►i t vr OCCUPANCY IS ISSUED PROTECT THIS CARD FROIV! THE WEATHER City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Department Building Inspection Division October 12, 2007 Frederick and Donna Gimeno 3575 Quail Street Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Mr. and Mrs. Gimeno, Certified Article Number 7160 -0 9844 6338 8916 SENDERS RECORD , It has come to the attention of the Building Inspection Division that you are constructing a bridge over Lena Gulch on your property at 3575 Quail Street. Application for the required permit far the bridge has not been made, and a permit for the bridge construction can not be approved due to the location of your property in the Lena Gulch 100-year floodplain. It is required that you cease construction of the bridge and remove all construction that has been completed immediately. Additionally, during the course of investigation of this matter, it has been determined that you are occupying the residence on the property without the legally required Certificate of Occupancy. A Certificate of Occupancy can not be issued at this time because the Engineer-of-Record has indicated that the basement floor elevation does not meet the CiYy of Wheat Ridge requirement of one foot above base flood elevation. City documents indicate that you have been made aware of this deficiency, but have failed to properly address it prior to occupying the residence. This letter is to inform you that the City of Wheat Ridge Building Inspection Division can not legally permit occupancy of the residence in its' cunent state, or construction of the bridge over Lena Gulch. We respectfully request that you contact the Building Inspection Division or Community Development Department immediately to discuss the actions necessary to rectify the illegal conditions which exist on your property. Please also be advised that if contact is not made prior to October 22, 2007, it will become necessary for the City of Wheat Ridge Building Inspection Division to issue a Stop Work order for the bridge, and a Notice and Order declaring the residence a Dangerous Building under the 1997 Uniform Code for Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, and to initiate proceedings to remove the bridge and vacate the property. Please contact us immediately so that an acceptable resolution to the situation may be found. Cordially, ?ohnC Fl chumacher, Jr., Chief Building Official City of Wheat Ridge Buil 7500 W. 29`11 Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Office (303) 235-2853 CBO ding Department From the desk of John Schumacher, CBO Chief Building Official Building Inspection Division Office (303) 235-2853 Fax (303) 235-2857 October 26, 2007 Gerry, For your reading pleasure, here is the sequence of events that occurred concerning 3575 Quail Street according to the documents in the file. I have placed the documents in order as they occur in the sequence of events. May 2, 2002 - A letter from Robert Goebel, then Director of Public Works, is sent to Lawrence E. Dezman, concerning a hydraulic analysis of the property at 3575 Quail Street, and the need for a Class II Special Exception to the Floodplain to build a single-family residence on the property in the future. December 9, 2005 - Donna Starr-Gimeno submits SFR perniit application to the City. December 16, 2005 - Building Division CBO Chadley Root approves permit for issuance. Permit is NOT issued at this time. February 16, 2006 - Donna Starr-Gimeno submits application for Floodplain Development Permit to be reviewed by the Board of Adjustment. March 17, 2006 - Public Works Department approves Building Permit application, conditioned on approval of the BOA and submission of a drainage certificate prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. March 23, 2006 - The BOA approves the Class Il Special Exception request, conditioned on the structure meeting the the development standards of of Section 26-806(F), the structures' finished floor elevation being one foot above the base flood elevation, stated as 5410, and flood-proofing of the basement in accordance with the standards set forth in Section 26-808. It is also stated that and "elevation certificate" shall be required prior to issuance of a CO. March 29, 2007 - Planning approves Building Permit "pursuant to Case No. WF-06-O1." April 7, 2006 - A letter is drafted to the Gimeno's stating that their Exception Permit has been approved by the BOA, and stating the conditions for approval and issuance of a CO. A Certificate oF Resolution is attached, which also states the conditions of approval. May 5, 2006 - Jones-Devish Engineering forwards a letter to the Ciry concerning the floodplain requirements and work to be performed on the proposed single-family residence to be constructed. The illustration shows the finished floar height at 5407, three feet below BFE. May 17, 2006- The Building Division issues the Building Permit for construction of the single- family residence, conditioned on Case WF-06-0 1, notes on plans, and drainage certification prior to CO. May 25, 2006 - An internal memo from Tim Paranto to Jeff Hirt states that Jones-Devish does not understand the floodplain requirements, restates the general requirements for approval, and states that PW cannot issue the required Special Exception Permit until the flood-proofing requirements are adequately addressed. May 30, 2006 - Planner Jeff Hirt forwards a letter of comment to Jones-Devish, requesting submission of information addressing errors and omissions in first submittal made on May 5, 2007. It also states that construction of the SFR cannot take place until the Special Exception Permit is approved. July 26, 2006 - Building Division issues "Stop Inspections Order" stating that flood-proofing has not been addressed to PW and no more inspections will be performed until flood-proofing has been approved. July 27, 2006 - Donna Starr-Gimeno sends e-mail letter to Tim Paranto acknowledging correspondence between Jones-Devish and the City, and stating that she is "neither able nor willing to stop construction" to address flood-proofing issues. August 1, 2007 - Community Development Director Alan White forwards a letter to the Gimenos advising that their Building Permit is suspended, that flood-proofing, as stated to them in the BOA hearing, must be addressed prior to the lifting of the suspension of the Building Permit, and that no additional work may be performed. August 7, 2006 - The Building Division posts a"Stop Work Order" based on work having been performed without inspection, and failure to address flood-proofing. August 8, 2006 - Stop Work Order is lifted by Alan White. No explanation is available. Jones-Devish forwards Inspection Memo #2 concerning buoyancy and basement floor construction. August 14, 2006 - Inspection Record card shows approval of reinforcing or Monolithic, with no other notes. September 5, 2006 - Inspection record card shows approval of "concrete slab floor." September 25, 2006 - A letter dated September 22, 2006 is received from Donna Starr-Gimeno addressing inspection of the SFR foundation. Attached are inspection letters from Jones-Devish, which indicate the contractor was given permission to pour both the footings and the walls. October 5, 2006 - The Class II Floodplain Development Permit was approved by Tim Paranto. The Permit specified that the Base Flood Elevation was set at 5410, and requires that the lowest floor elevation be 5411. October 2006 through August 2007 - Inspections are conducted and approved by Building Division. August 13, 2007 - Building Final Inspection is "approved pending permit requirements for dog run", and "OK to occupy" is noted on inspection notice. PW conducts a Final Inspection and notes some drainage concerns along the westerly property line and associated with the dog run inlet. August 14, 2007 - Dave Brossman, Development Review Engineer and Bill Larow, Stormwater Coordinatar met with the Engineer-of-Record, Mr. Henry Hollender, P.E., Ms. Gimeno, and her contractor, to discuss the comments/concerns on the PW Final Inspection Report. Changes to the roof drains, to the outlet pipe for the area drain by the dog run, and the placement of some additional erosion control along the southerly (Lena Gulch) area were all agreed upon. Mr. Hollender stated that he would be submitting a Drainage Certification Letter with As-Builts in a week or so. August 23, 2007 - Mr. Henry Hollender, P.E. requested a meeting with Tim Paranto and Dave Brossman to discuss the Drainage Certification Letter and As-Builts required prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. Mr. Hollender stated the Certification Letter and As-Builts provide evidence that the site was completed "in general conformance" with the approved engineering documents. However, Mr. Hollender also acknowledged the lowest floor elevation was constructed at 5410.56, which is 0.44' below the 5411 elevarion as required in the Class II Floodplain Permit. Due to the fact that the site was NOT completed per the approved civil engineering drainage & site design documents, PW had to reject the Certification. PW stated to Mr. Hollender that a Certificate of Occupancy can not be issued either until such time as evidence is provided that the basement was constructed using proper floodproofing techniques, or remedial measures have been taken to bring the lowest floor elevation into compliance with the approved documents, and a revised Drainage Certification Letter with associated As-Built Plans or floodproofing certification have been submitted for review and approval. August 24, 2007 - Memo from PW to Building Division states that PW cannot sign off on CO request due to elevation issues noted in drainage certificate. September 5, 2007 Gimeno and her engineer, Henry Hollender, met with Meredith Reckert and Tim Paranto to discuss the impact of the flood elevation to the approval of the construction of the home below the required elevation. October 11, 2007 - During water quality inspection, PW inspector notes bridge over L,ena Gulch under construction. During investigation of permit requirements for bridge, Building Division notes that 3575 Quai] Street is now occupied without CO. October 12, 2007 - Certified letter is sent to Gimenos advised to stop construcrion ofbridge and contact the City concerning occupancy without CO. October 18, 2007 - Meeting between Gimenos and John Schumacher and Meredith Reckert occurs. Gimenos present written information concerning occurrence of events, and reasoning for granting of request for CO. They are advised that they will be contacted afrer consideration of the matter. 3 The City of Wheat Ridge Flood Plain Development Permit Application Information Permit Date -04, /b 6 Owner~ (lc K- f!-'„ H.eno 4~.F 1 we, s)*Ae -l,44,z Telephone ~Z10 - 6S-13 ~ Project VSingle Family Residential _Multi-Family Residential Manufactured (Mobile) Home Non-residential Telephone._~'~-f;(~.v-04• ~ Project DescripNon " New Construction Substantial Improvement (>50%) _Improvement (<50%) Rehabilitation Channelization Fill Bridge/Culvert Levee Class of PermiUFee Schedule CI s I(structures for non-human occupancy) $300 s II (structures for human occupancy) $840 (includes public noticing fees) :3 and ur)derstand and will comply with the requirements of this Flood Plain Permit. ~ Date (To be completed by Flood Plain Administrator) Flood Hazard Data Watercourse Name 6~>u L e~ln✓ The project is proposed in the Floodway Floodway Base (100-yeaz) flood elevation(s) at project site Elevation required for Lowest Floor .5'¢ NGVD / Floodproofin; Source Documents: Reports/Maps S; 4, D>' I4 a-X s~,~e~ O~/.Ui~ f.~/ ~✓Y.S G~P . ~'1./,L c~ NGVD Z Proposal Review Checklist Site development plans aze complete and depict flood hazard data. -TEngineering data is provided for proposed map and floodw•ay revisions. =Floodway Certificate and data documents no increase in flood heights. Subdivision proposals minimize flood damage and protect utilities. f Lowest floor elevations are above the base (100-year) flood level. Manufactured homes address elevation and anchoring requirements. A Floodproofing Certificate certifies floodproofing designs. Other: Permit Action x Permit Approved: The information submitted for the proposed project was reviewed and is in compliance with approved flood plain management standards (site development plans aze on file). Permit Denied: The proposed project does not meet approved flood plain management standazds (explanation is on file). Variance Granted: A variance was granted from the base (100-yeaz) flood elevations established by FEMA consistent with vaziance requirements of NFIP regulations Part 60.6 (variance action documentation is on file). Flood Pla' Administrator's Signature Date T'/ d~Aj Comments: 0 sa 5g_/L Gc c .0zv 3--~ r-G Compliance Documentation Map Revision Data. Certified documentation by a registered professional engineer of as-built conditions for flood plain alterations were received and submitted to FEMA for a flood insurance map revision. Fill Certificate. A community official certified the elevation, compaction, slope and slope protection for all fill placed in the flood plain consistent with NFIP regulations Part 65.5 for map revisions. Elevation and Floodproofing CertiTcates. The as-built elevation of the builiding's lowest floor was certified as NGVD; or the building's floodproofing level was certified as NGVD; by a registered professional engineer or licensed surveyor and is on file. Certificate of Occupancy or Compliance Issued on Rev.3/11/03 ~ Date GRADING. EROSION CONTROL, AND SEDIMENT CONTROL GENERAL NOTES. 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE AT LEAST THREE DAYS PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. Y 2. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES WILL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO GRADING ACTIVITIES. J L L E G E N D 3. AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION, ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND ~f REPAIRED AS NEEDED TO PREVENT ACCELERATED EROSION ON THE SITE AND Deciduous Tree ADJACENT PROPERTIES. "_L~ 4. ALL TOPSOIL SHALL BE SALVAGED. TOPSOIL AND OVERBURDEN SHALL BE Sanitary Manhole REDISTRIBUTED WITHIN THE GRADED AREA AFTER ROUGH GRADING TO 1 i PROVIDE A SUITABLE BASE FOR AREAS WHICH WILL BE SEEDED AND Unknown Manhole PLANTED. RUNOFF FROM STOCKPILED AREAS SHALL BE CONTROLLED TO i PREVENT EROSION. 5. IF IT IS NECESSARY TO REMOVE MATERIAL IN EXCESS OF 200 CUBIC t 1 Ex. Contours YARDS TO ANOTHER SITE IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, A GRADING PERMIT IS NECESSARY FOR THE OFF-SITE PROPERTY. IF THE MAZ~ERIAL IS MOVED 1 Proposed Contours TO A PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN ANOTHER JURISDICTION, EVIDENCE IS REQUIRED THAT THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT HAS APPROVED THE GRADING 1 i OPERATION. Silt Fence 6. SOIL STABILIZATION MEASURES SHALL BE APPLIED WITHIN 30 DAYS TO DISTURBED AREAS WHICH MAY NOT BE AT FINAL GRADE, BUT WILL BE LEFT DORMANT FOR LONGER THAN 50 DAYS. t Vehicle Tracking Control L i 7. PERMANENT VEGETATIVE COVER CONSISTING OF SOD SHALL BE USED TO L STABILIZED ALL EXPOSED SURFACES THAT WILL NOT BE COVERED BY IMPERVIOUS MATERIAL. e 8. FUGITIVE DUST EMISSIONS RESULTING FROM GRADING ACTIVITIES AND/OR WIND SHALL BE CONTROLLED USING THE BEST AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY, AS DEFINED BY THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, AT ~ i THE TIME OF GRADING. 1 9. THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN SHALL BE MODIFIED BY THE Y e CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, OR ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, AS FIELD t S CONDITIONS WARRANT. I 1 10. SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSPECTED AND REPAIRED AS NECESSARY i DO NOT RELIEVE AN AFTER EACH STORM EVENT. SEDIMENTS SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN ONE HALF OF THE DESIGN DEPTH HAS BEEN FILLED. REMOVED SEDIMENT SHALL i i ~ Jt: BE SODDED. BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE. 11. WATER TRUCK MAY BE REQUIRED TO CONTROL AIRBORNE EROSION AS =L._ - L DETERMINED BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE. ■  ~.J ~C' ~i. ` yl r ~ . 1. J r ~ r "`S , - i' ~ i I J i 12. STRAW BALE BARRIER SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE AND BE PROPERLY ' ~ ~ fr' r ~ C 1 ~ r,f r ; ` E-... { ~ I MAINTAINED UNTIL PERMANENT LANDSCAPING IS E TABLISHED. c t l % p t..~ i f'' I'd ~ tif•• k y j / l ~ l ` ~ I ~ ~ i ^ _g f_i '•k 1 ! ~ " Y~ ~..,r / S o ~ I E i,~; , ~ u ~ i j ~ ~ ~ ~ i` ~ y ~ r ; i 'T~' t rr, f ~ - - i ~ f r i ~ `i ~ 1. l _ r , ~--EXISTING GRAVEL (TYP.~ s ,r, 1 ~ 3 j 3 ~ i , r~ ~ ~ 'r,,,. ~ x.._ 1 A _ ~ _ _ , , _ ~r f L 1 ~ ~ ~ / ,r' - - r i G'7.,~, 1 t .i t ~ ~ ; r ' 1~~,1~, i > ,a , r 1, ,t,~ r r~ i , ~ , d Y f ~ ~ L. i~ ' lY h , I . ` f~ , ~ . ~ 1. ~1~.~.. t.. I 1 - v . , 1, tJ J f. ~ , r. r !11 ~ G ~ f, ~E)I I, r d `4, ~ . , _ i C E. .m f ~ ~ 1 ( I U n.._....-.... l' r r ~T_ ~ ~~_v r,_. ~ _ ~ _ _v . . YV ~ r ~ _ ~ _ _ _ w J,,,. _ _.r , ; i DATUM INFORMATION ,w w- t`4 t, V ^ y''~ i._f M \ ~ .-'~"r~~ 'rte f/~` ~T J 'ti.~. / u' J~`7r ~ ~y,.-~ ~ r inn/ "-~,,N,' iv~'~ ~'~iJL,,~ r,, , ~ { _.4 f Horizontal coordinates are based on a local system. i ~ _S'.., ' I 1 ( {q t ll i_/ V rL_~ r'1 tip a~~ ~~t ~1 Ir',r J i~- s ~ i ~.,i ~';1 r ~ ; ~t ; ~ ~ r ~ i t ` ,.7 r' ~ l ~ ~ T'he vertical benchmark for this survey is NGS/NOAA Point G412 having an elevation r ~ r k•. *-v of 5395.11 feet as published in the City of wheat Ridge benchmark listing. { F - ~ l ~ ~ ~ ~ I • / ~ \ 1 S' f UTIIITY NOTES / / ~ t P~ ~//fir' 1 ~ { Except for observable/visible surface evidence and utility marks placed by -f~ ~ ~ ~ ~~1 ~ , ~ ti ~ t ~ ;r i...; i. un~own parties on the site, no utility locations were researched, marked or v 1 ~r ~ l ,~V 1\ 1\ , 1` located by D&S Surveying Services, LI~C. tk: ~ i i r-j ~ ~ ~ ~ Due to OSHA regulations and the inability to enter confined spaces and / - ~ / `f ~ ~ ~ manholes, pipe sizes (if shorn) are appro~nate and must be verified prior to 1. ~ / \ ~ ~ V ~ ~ - x~' f„ ~~.1 use. v ~ i~ UTII~ITY IACATIONS MUST HE DETER~dINED PRIOR TO DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION. ` _ . ~ _ 1 - HVS Engineering, Inc. expressly disclaims, assumes no liability for the ~ 'i - `t ~ _ A underground location of or existence of utilities including but not limited to, 3 storm seiner, sanitary sewer, water main lines\stubouts and telephone, electric, i , , ~ .r_ f~ gas or cable locations. i_ 4 5 14 24 ~4 ~_S i p ~J f 1 inch = 20 ft. E 'l r i S I 7~ •.a{ i f T j 1 GRADING REVISIONS REQUIRED BY CHANGE IN FlNISH FLOOR ELEVAl10NS 9/18/06 HH i uu ~ ;u~ ~ ~ t~  - --_L--. ~~7.._.._ ■ I /111 1 1 IT11 ITI ►IATIrI^ A TA►1 ■ hVJ tIVUIIVttK11VU, IIVu. GRADING PLAN 5777 OLDE WADSWORTH BLVD., R-800 FF FRED AND DONNA GIMENO ARVADA, COLORADO 80002 PHONE: (303) 940-5807 FAX: (303) 940-5803 3575 QUAIL STREET DESIGNED BY: HH WHEAT RIDGE, CO. DRAWN BY: LIVIR REVISION: IN. RAN+1 DATE: 03/15/06 REV REVISION DESCRIPTION DATE CHANGED CH BY 3575 Quail Street 1. March 3, 2006, Posted property for Board of Adjustment Hearing. 2. March 23, 2006, Received Board of Adjustment approval for construction. 3. Submitted plans to city. 4. Jones-Devish Engineering hand-carried letter about flood proofing to City of Wheat Ridge. 5. May 19, 2006, Paid $17,940.82 for Single Family Residence Permit 6. May 20, 2006, Started construction. 7. July 26, 2006, received a Stop Work Order from Chadley Root, building inspector with the following notation. "Flood Proofing has not been submitted or signed off as ok from public works. There will be no more inspections until the flood proofing of basement has been approved. Need address Q driveway." g. July 27, 2006, Received letter sent to engineer Jones-Devish dated 5/30/06, written by Jeff Hirt of the Community Development Depaztment. This letter was not sent to me. This letter was written 11 days after the issue of the building permits. This letter was sent to me via email from Mr. Paranto on 7/26J06. 9. July 27, 2006, Synopsis of letter written to Mr. Paranto, Mr. Root, and Mr. Hirt: As for the rest of the points in your letter the belaw explanarion covers all the numerated points: 1. Flood proofing will extend a minimum of 1 foot above the 100-year flood plain elevation of 5411 and wi11 be a Tremco Watchdog Seamless Waterproofing Membrane. This product is sprayed on at 60 mils and cures at 40 mils with 500 % elongation. Watchdog Waterproofing provides a 10-year transferable warranty to the homeawner• 2. There is an Exterior Drain Tile System consisting of trenching at 118" fall minimum per linear foot, with attached poiythene to foundation wall and extended into the trench. There will be installed 4" rigid perforated pipe with waterproof fitrings, and gravel to fill the sides and top of pipe with a minimum of 6". The cover system wilI consist of mirafi fabric and discharge is to be to a supplied and installed sump pump pit with pump. The sump pump pit will only have one opening at the floor level. The high point of the drain is to be the bottom of pipe, 12" belozu the top of the footer. 3. The basement floor will be raised a total of 3 feet above the original plans. This is to accommodate for the 100-year flood plain height The finished floor will be 5410.1. 4. The sump pump is explained in ifem 2. 5. All penetrarions through the basement slab and walls will either be located above the 100-year flaod plain height of 5410 or be sleeved and sealed. All rubber water stops will be installed inta all concrete cold joints between the footings, walls and slabs. This should answer your questions about the flood-proofing design. I am expecting the Special Exception Permit to be issued for my new home. Please let me knozu when I will have the permit. If there are additional questions, please contact me at the numbers below or on cell phone at 720480-9549. 10. July 28, 2006, I have Geotechnical/Environmental Engineer Matthew Behrens from InTEC send an addendum to 7/20/06 for inspection of all the foundation excavation and cobble placement. 11. August 3, 2006, had all the footings, column pads and increased footing sizes inspected by Jones-Devish Engineers. 12. August 8, 2006 Stop Work orders from City of Wheat Ridge stating; "No inspections were done by the City. Need to inspect rebar. Remove Concrete. No Flood proofing signed off by flood plain administrator.° Chadley Root. 13. Aixgust 8, 2006, increased size of basement slab as required by the City of Wheat Ridge to 12° to resist 2 feet of buoyancy as required by the city due to possible flooding. 14. August 9, 2006, picture of basement prior to pouring floor and before inspection. 15. August 14, 2006 inspectaon of stem walls and basement walls. 16. All inspections by the City of Wheat Ridge regarding interior/exterior drains, sump pump, back-flow valves and waterproofing are passed. Reasons to issue Certification of Occupancy 1. The residential struciure at 35 75 Quail Street has never been or never will be in the 100-year flood plain. (See attached documentation; "The 100. year flood elevation determined by the Howard Noble I'roperty analysis provided by Futura Engineering, Inc., dated Apri117, 2002 and approved by the City of Wheat Ridge indicates that the 100-year flood plain elevation on this property is 5410. Any habitable portion constructed below elevation 5411 shall be flood proofed in accordance with the City of Wheat Ridge Floodplain ordinance.") Approved again on Mazch 10, 2006 Department of Public Works. (See attached Grading Plan schematic) 2. Floodplain Interpretation: Article VIII Sec. 26-803 General Provisions Section, Subsection E, Interpretation. "In the interpretation and actual buoyancy is only one foot but the City requested two feet of buoyancy. Tt►is increases the actual safety factor to 240 k. There is an additional Drainage Report and Plan by Henry Hollander, Registered Professional Engineer as to drainage issues and final grading plan. 1. There is a retaining wall constructed by the City as part of the Lena Gulch Project. m. There are two additiona125 high Rock Retaining walls along the entire front of the residence, between the residence and the 100- year flood plain. n. All phases of construction were inspected and passed by the City of Wheat Ridge Inspectors and the City of Wheat Ridge Chief Building Official. o. Wheat Ridge Building Officials issued an Occupancy Permit for 3575 Quail Street. p. Article VIII Floodplain Control Section 26-810 Subsection C(2) (e) Ensuring that those who occupy the areas of special flood hazards assume responsibility for their actions. i. Our residence is covered by homeowners, flood and construction insurance in excess of 1.8 million dollars through 8/20/08. (Rocco Santengelo insurance, Construction Benefits, Inc.) 2. Article Num6er 7160 3901 9644 6338 8916 3. Service Type CENTIflED MAIL 4. Restricted Delivery? (EMra Fee) ❑Yes i. ArticleAddressetlto: Fredrick and Donna Gimeno 3575 Quail St. Wheat Ridge, 80033 BD - Re: 3575 Quail St. PS Form 3811, July 2001 Domestic A. ReCeiVed by (Pleese Pnnt cleary) tl.~ ye[e ot,ue11very c. siena ~ Aqentt Addresaee . le elive a es ent imm ttem 77 Ves If YES, enter delivery addreas below: ENo DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 7500 WEST 29T" AVENUE • WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 L) June 28, 2002 . Mr. Lawrence Dezman, P.E. v` U~ S Future Engineering, Inc. 12741 East Caley Avenue, Suite 126 Englewood, Colorado 80111 Re: Howard Noble Property Hydraulic Analysis - Letter of Approvai Dear Mr. Dezman, (303) 235-2861 FAX (303) 235-2857 ~ I This letter is to inform you that I have reviewed your letter dated May 28th, 2002 which addresses Bob Gcebel's comments regarding the above referenced property. Based upon this information, the hydraulic analysis for this properry is approved by the City of Wheat Ridge. As noted in your letter, the processing of the Class II Special Exception to the flood plain wlll be completed by the respective homebuilder. Please be aware that a bullding permit can not be issued by the City until this requirement has been met. Regarding the easement vacation request from Mr. Noble, I would prefer that a detailed written request be siirbmitted for review by City staff. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 3 -2 -2863. Si rely, Greg Kn son, M.P.A. Interim Dlrector of Public Works cc: Alan White, Planning & Development Director Steve Nguyen, Interim City Engineer Darin Morgan, Codes Administrator ✓ File -)(-?Ja.oA.a-ax bac-~--~ 3[200~--2-854 CrrY oF cvHEnr ninGE CERTIFTCATE OF WATER ANb 3EWER SER'VICE AVAILABII.ITY 7Noie ia Applicant: A buildirig permit will noY be issued without this Cerralicate aigiLed by the D"utrict or Agency supplyiag services. This Certificate exvires one veaz firom date QCoomnal bv authoriain¢ a¢ent. ' bate Descripfiori C7se of Buiiding rA E*Ai:*Vnc•vi.~ 3A4~1eb-o Owner Address Telcphone C- '9-2.0 - '-~EO^ 9~1 SE'PVER Nameo£District: ~ p4n4D, Indirvidual5eyticPetmitNo. 6ewer Scrvice Aysilablc . Sewer Sccvioc Not AWailxblc Cosmnmm or Condirions: T heieby eeitiFy ebat availabiliiy of servioe is u indieated above. Signawre of Authori2ed Agoa[ Aate JefPerson Couaty Fiealth Depaxtmenf (IF SEP7TG) Authorized Sigaature Date " ~ WATF.4 Nameo(District LaSY1,.~t~-UC~Ch1~ ColOtadOWeuPeituit W Water Sexvioe Available ( )Wsar Srrvice Not Availahle CemmcntsorCoaditlocs WATER SERVICE IS AYAILABLE SUBJECT ?0 COMPLIANCE WITH THE COMPANY'S RULES, REGULATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR SUCH SERVICE. ? I °"TTV °"°P'1117('""I'P"T"r savioo IN ais MRIcama aoouc. Jaifaraoa Gounty Hetlth btpertme4t (IF VIE1,L) Authoxized SignaAac Date TO'd 8S:ST SOOZ ZT MQ ZSKS£Mt:XE-~ Md 8 91VINNtild FROM :WESTRIDGE SRNITRTION FRX N0. :303 424 2628 Dec. 14 2005 11:54RM P2 -k"U-La-~cxk 3t CI OF WHEAT RLDGE CERTIE'ICATE OFWATETt.4ND SEWER SERVYCE AVAILABILTTY Note to Applicant: A buildiag permit will aot be issued without this CertiBcate siped by tho District or Agency supplying setviecs. This Ceruficat.eires one veaz from date of aimroval bv ' in¢ a,¢mt• Date Description Uae ofButlding ~ 'Frer\ t.'C>,~nar~ C'1xMe v10 'JI SIoD- 01J~'F Owner Address TeIephoae srwEx Name of Aistrid: i o%4L Individual Sepeic Peomit No. (~'9evver Sarvix Available Sewer Savice Not Aveilable corments or condirions: Plea!~ e --,e e,ca'k-6CLed Ietirour- I z. ~.1'4I s I hercby ccxtify tLat avulabiliry of seMce is at i¢dicated above. Signaaue of AutLorized Agwt Date Jef[e,rson CounYy Health Depnrtmtrt (IF SEPTIG) tWATE* NamaofDiclrick: ~_.SYI~AC~(c~ \^PLChin5;, ColoiadoWellPamit Wator Servleo Available Waur Savice Not Aveilable Commmta or Condieions: I hercby cectify tLat availabiltty of seNicO is as indieated above. 6ignawre o[ Authori2eA Agent Date Jefferson county xaalth neparbmnt (IF wsu,) anmonzed sign.n,n ZQ'd WST SOOZ ZL OeQ LS8ZS£L£0£:Xe-i Pld '8 JNIMItJId FROM :WESTRIDGE SANITRTION FRX N0. :303 424 2628 Dec. 14 2005 11:54RM P3 WESTRIDGE SANITATION DISTRIGT 3705 Kipling Sheet - Suite 101 Wheat RId9e, Coloredo 80033 Phone (309) 424-9487 Fau (303) 4242628 December 14, 2005 City of Wheat Ridge FAX: 303-235-2857 RE: Certificate of Water and Sewer Service Availability 3575 Quail Street, Wheat Ridge Colorado 80033 Single-Family Residence New Construction Please be advised as of this date, the above address is within the District boundaries, and the District has sufficient capacity to serve according to Westridge Sanitation District Rules and Regulations. Also be advised that depending on location of the building on the lot, additional requirements may include main extension, property easement on adjoining lot(s), a long service line, and/or lift station, the cost of alt to be borne by the property holder. WESTRIDGE SANITATION DI3TRICT Kim Dahlin, Office Manager C CHURCH and Associates, Inc. adivisionof InTE Integrated Testing and Engineering Company of Denver Metro, LLC Geotechnical 8 OmSite Wastewater Engineering Environmental & Geological Engineering • Construction Services May 19, 2005 Donna Starr-Gimeno 1623 Ogden Street Denver, Colorado 80218 Re: Soils and Foundation Investigation Proposed Residence 3574 Quail Street, Wheat Ridge Jefferson County, Colorado Ms. Donna Stan-Gimeno, As requested, CHURCH/InTEC has preformed a soil and foundation investigation for the proposed residence. The attached report presents the results of the field investigation, laboratory testing and recominendations for foundation type and bearing pressures, slab floor and basement wall recommendations, and recommendations related to the proposed construction. CHURCH/InTEC appreciates and wishes to thank you for the opporhxnity to be of service to you on this project. If we can be of additional assistance during the materials testing-quality control phase of construction, please call us at (303) 463 9317. Respectfully submitted, Church & Associates, a division of InTEC of Denver Metro, LLC. c v Pilee-Pk-.>-~ " a1/ Dileep Cherlopalle, E.I. Staff Engineer 16 Edward O. Church, P.E. Chief Engineer 4~~---- »Copies Submitted: Above (3) 4501 Wadsworth Blvd. • Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 •(303) 463-9317 • fax (303) 463-9321 • www.InTEC-Geotech.com Aos[in Dallas/FL Worth Houston San Antonio (512) 252-1218 (817) 858-0870 (28 1) 371-3330 (210) 525-9033 fax(5121252-1219 faxlXITRSR-004fi faYl9R71277_a24d v- 0 imsl<_onao InTEC Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2 2.0 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION 2 3.0 SITE CONDITIONS 2 3.1 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION .........................................................2 3.2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3 TABLE 1- SLAB RISK CATEGORYSN'ELL RANGES 3 4.0 DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDATIONS 3 4.1 ANALYSIS OF RESULTS 3 4.2 BUILDING FOUNDATIONS 4 4.2.1 SPREAD-TYPE FOOTINCS 4 4.3 SLAB-ON-GRADE CONSTRUCTION .........................................................4 4.4 LATERAL LOADS AND SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE 5 4.5 SURFACE DRAINAGE 6 4.6 SITE PREPARATION ........................................................6 4.7 EXCAVATIONS ........................................................6 5.0 LIMITATIONS 7 FIGURE 1- SITE PLAN AND LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2- LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURES 3 THROUGH 5- SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGiJRES 6 AND 7- GRADATION TEST RESULTS APPENDIX A- IMPORTANT 1NFORMATION ABOUT THIS REPORT APPENDIX B- TYPICAL FOUNDATION DRAIN DETAILS APPENDIX C - EARTHWORK RECONIMENDATIONS lntegrated Testing and InTEC EXECUTIVE SUNIMARY This report presents the results of a soils and foundation investigation for the proposed residence at 3574 Quill Street in Wheat Ridge, Colorado. The proposed residence will have a full basement with an attached garage. The purpose of our invesrigation was to evaluate subsurface conditions at the site and provide geotechnical recommendations for the proposed construction. The report presents a description of subsurface conditions encountered at the site, recommended foundation systems, and design and consh-uction criteria influenced by the subsurface condifions. The report is based on data developed during the field investigation, laboratory test results and our previous experience. A summary of our findings and recommendations is presented below: • The test borings encountered clay with sand to approximate depths of 13 to 25 feet below existing site grades. Underlying the clay was gravelly sand that was encountered to the extent of the borings. • Laboratory analysis indicate that the soils exhibit moderate to no consolidation potential under a surcharge pressure of 1000 pounds per square foot and wetted conditions and some compressibility at increased loadings. • Free water was encountered at depths of 17 and 29 feet in test borings during and after 24 hours of drilling. Caving was not observed in the test borings during drilling. • Based on the results of the field investigation and laboratory analysis, the proposed structure can be supported on spread footings bearing on a minimum of two feet of stnxctural fill with a limited risk of differential movement. Design and consiruction criteria aze presented in the body of the report. • There is a low risk of slab movement at the proposed slab elevations utilizing the existing materials. A structural floor over a void space should be used if the risk of movement is not acceptable. Slabs supported on grade should be free to move vertically, and not connected to the foundation system. • In order to minunize the chance for moisture infiltration into the foundation soils and limit the potential for movement of the foundations and/or slabs, Positive drainage down and away from all foundation wa11s and the structure should be established and maintained at atl times. • Exterior ar interior foundation perimeter drain with crawlspace drainage should be installed below basement elevations. Integrated Testing and Engineering Company InTEC Page 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report is submitted pursuant to a geotechnical engineering investiga6on made by this firm of the site of the proposed residence to be located at 3574 Quail Street in Wheat Ridge, Colorado. The object of this study was to evaluate the physical properties of the subsoils underlying the site to provide recommendations for foundation design, slab support, basement construction and related earthwork. 2.0 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed residence will have a full basement with an attached garage. The proposed construction will consist of concrete basement walls and wood frame construction above grade. Although foundation loads are unknown at the time of this report, it is anticipated that the structure will be relatively lightly loaded with column and wa111oads on the order of 20 kips and 2 kips per linear foot, respectively. It is assumed that the basement slab elevaUon will be approximately 8 to 10 feet below exisring site grade. Should design details differ form those presented, this firm should be notified so we can provide additional recommendations, if required. 3.0 SITE CONDITIONS The subject property is located at 3574 Quail Street in Wheat Ridge, Colorado. The site is currently undeveloped and relatively flat within the proposed building envelope. The ground surface is native grass and small trees. A creek flows along in the west side of the subjectproperty. 3.1 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Subsurface conditions were investigated on April 18, 2005 by drilling two exploratory borings at the location shown in Figure 1. The borings were drilled to approximately 25 to 35 feet below existing site grades. The borings were advanced using a 4-inch diameter continuous flight auger powered by a CME-45 drilling rig. Samples were taken at selected intervals using a Califomia ring sampler, which was driven into the soil by dropping a 140-pound hammer through a free fall of 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampler into the soil is known as a penetration test. The number of blows required for the sampler to penetrate 12 inches is evaluated and gives an indication of the consistency or relative density of the soils and bedrock encountered. The results of the penetration test and log of materials encountered are presented in the Log of Exploratory Borings in Figure 2. Samples were retumed to the laboratory where they were visually classified and testing was assigned to evaluate the engineering properties of the soil layers. Laboratory testing consisted of moisture and density determinations, 200 sieve analyses, Gradarion test and swell and consolidation tests. The results of the laboratory testing are presented in Figures 2 through 7. lutegrated Testing Soils and Foundation Investigation, Job No. C051048 InTEC Page 3 3.2 SUBSURFACE CONDTTIONS As indicated on the Logs of the Test Borings, the subsurface conditions consisted of soft to medium stiff clay with sand to approximately 13 and 25 feet below existing site grades. Underlying the clay was loose to medium dense sand that was encountered to the eatent of the borings. The overlying sand, clay encountered generally had medium plasticity, fine to medium grained sand, was moist to wet, and brown to tan in color. The underlying gravelly sand generally was medium to coazse grained, wet, and brown in color. Free water was encountered at depths 17 and 29 feet during and after 24 hours of drilling in test borings. Caving was not observed in the test boring during drilling. It should be noted that groundwater might be encountered during construction from perched conditions not encountered during drilling and/or seasonal fluctuations. The building contractor should be prepared to deal with groundwater, if encountered. The geotechnical practice in the Denver area uses a relative scale to evaluate swelling potentials. When the sample is wetted under a surcharge pressure of 1000 pounds per square foot (PSF), the measured percent swell is classified as low, moderate, high, or very high. It is important to note that measured swell is not the only criteria for slab-on-grade recommendations and additional factors are considered by the geotechnical engineer when evaluating the risk for slab-on-grade construction. The following table presents the relative classification criteria. Additional important information regarding geotechnical risk is included as Appendix A. TABLE 1- SLAB RISK CATEGORY SWELL RANGES Risk Category Percent Swell Under A 1000 PSF Surchaz e Pressure Low 0-<2 Moderate 2 - <4 Hi h 4-<6 Very High 6 or Greater Swell-consolidation test results for samples exhibited moderate consolidation potential (3.8%) when wetted under a surcharge pressure of 1000 PSF. Swell-consolidation test results are presented in Figures 3 through 5. 4.0 DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 ANALYSIS OF RESULTS Based on the results of the exploratory borings and laboratory testing, it is recommended that the proposed residence be supported on spread footings bearing on a minimum of two feet of stntctural fill.. Post-construction moisture increases or decreases in the supporting soils will Integrated Testing and Engineering Soils and Foundation Investigation, Job No. C051048 InTEC Page 4 likely cause some foundation movements and, thus, careful site drainage and moisture protection procedures as outlined in Section 4.5 of this report will be critical for the satisfactory performance of the building. 4.2 BUILDING FOUNDATIONS 4.2.1 Spread-Type Footings Shallow spread-type footings bearing at uniform depths below finished grade, in conjunction with the recommended site preparation and moisture protection provisions, are recommended for support of the structure. An allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,500 pounds per square foot (PSF) is recommended for the design of shallow spread-type footings bearing on two feet of structural fill. Structural fill should extend a minimum of two feet on both sides of the footings.. Minimum depths of footings should be 3 feet below lowest adjacent finished grade for the perimeter footings and 12-inches below fmished floor slab elevation for interior footings in heated areas. Two feet and 1.33 feet aze the minimum recommended widths of square and continuous footings, respectively. In order to minimize the sensitivity of the structure to differential movement, footings and walls should be reinforced to allow for a degree of load redistribution should a localized zone of the supporting soils become saturated. Stem walls should either be positively sepazated from floor slabs or reinforced to prevent cracking at the slab stem wall interface. The bearing pressure recommended above applies to full dead plus realistic live loads and can be safely increased by one-third for total loads including wind or seismic farces. Total vertical movements of footings designed as recommended above, are estimated not to exceed 1-inch for moisture contents of the materials encountered during test drilling or compac- tion moisture contents introduced during placement of the sh-uctural fill. Differential movements are estimated to be less than 75 percent of maximum vertical movements. Significant moisture increases above these contents could create additional movements and could create excessive movement in some areas of the site. Accordingly, the site drainage and moisture protection provisions recommended in Section 4.5 are critical design considerations. 4.3 SLAB-ON-GRADE CONSTRUCTION The materials encountered near the proposed slab elevations aze considered suitable for support of lightly loaded slab-on-grade construction due to minimal risk for slab heave. It is recommended that a structural slab system be utilized for the floors if no movement can be tolerated. The potential heave is estimated to be less than I inch for slabs supported by the materials encountered in the boring. Slabs-on-grade should not be attached to interior or exterior Integrated l'esting and Engineenng Company Soils and Foundation Investigation, Job No. C051048 InTEC Page 5 bearing members. The slabs should be consmxcted as „floating slabs, which are free to move m the vertical direction. The following design and construction details are recommended for slab-on- grade construction. Slabs should be separated from exterior walls and interior bearing members. Vertical movement of the slabs should not be restricted. Using brittle floor finishes such as tile on slabs in areas with expansive soil increases the risk for damage. Exterior slabs neaz critical entryways should be supported by a haunch with a minimum 12-inch void below the slab. Slab bearing partitions should be minimized. Where such partitions aze used, a slip joint should be constructed to allow free vertical movement of the slab. Slip joints should allow at least 2 inches of vertical movement and be maintained following construction. This value is not to be construed as a heave estimate and the partition void should be re-established if the void closes to 0.5 inches. i7nderslab plumbing should be eliminated where feasible. Where such plumbing is unavoidable it should be thoroughly pressure tested during construction. Plumbing and utilities, which pass through the slab, should be isolated from the slab. If a forced air heating system is used and the furnace is located on the slab, we recommend provision of a collapsible connection between the furnace and the ductwork. The above design and construction criteria will not prevent movement, but will reduce damage if movement occurs. 4.4 LATERAL LOADS AND SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE The ultimate passive soil resistance against edges of footings, gradebeams, etc., with properly compacted backfill, should be considered as being equal to forces exerted by a fluid of 250 pounds per cubic foot unit weight. Below grade walls must be designed for lateral loads. For "active" conditions, the walls should be designed for an equivalent fluid pressure of 55 pounds per cubic foot (PCF) for properly compacted backfill. For "at rest" condirions, equivalent fluid pressures of 65 PCF should be used. These loads do not include swelling pressures, hydrostatic loads or surchazge loads such as sloping backfill or vehicles. In the basement, interior or exterior foundation drains around the perimeter of the proposed structure should be installed. Foundation drains will reduce the risk of "wet basement" conditions and the buildup of hydrostatic pressures. Foundation drains should lead to a positive gravity outlet ar a sump where water is removed by pumping. Foundation drains should be installed similar to the details presented in Appendix B. sting ancl Engineering Company Soils and Foundation Investigation, Job No. C051048 InTEC Page 6 4.5 SURFACE DRAINAGE The risk for wetting of foundation soils can be reduced by cazefully planned and maintained sarface drainage. The following precautions should be observed during construction and be maintained at all times after the structure is completed. Excessive wetting or drying of open foundation excavations should be avoided as much as possible during construction. Backfill adjacent to foundation walls should be moistened and compacted. Any settlement of backfill after completion of the structure should be repaired and positive drainage reestablished. The ground surface surrounding the structure should be sloped to drain away from the structure in all directions. A minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet should be achieved and maintained after construction. Roof downspouts and drains for the residence should dischazge to the surface well beyond the limits of all backfill. Irrigated landscaping should not be placed within 5 to 10 feet of the foundation walls. Plastic membranes should not be used to cover the ground surface immediately surrounding the structure. These membranes trap moisture and prevent normal evaporation from occurring. Geotextile fabrics aze a suitable option to control weed growth and allow some evaporation. 4.6 SITE PREPARATION Organic material, man made fill, and any debris or deleterious materials should be removed from the foundation area and wasted off site or used for non-structural purposes. Where required, structural fill should be placed in 8-inch uncompacted thickness lifts and compacted to 95 percent of the standard Proctor maximum dry density (MPD) within 2 percent of the optimum moistwe content (OMC). Structural fill should be non-expansive material that meets the requirements set forth in Appendix C. Coarse-grained material larger than 3 inches in diameter should not be utilized. Structures supported by insufficiently compacted structural fill may settle. Any fill not utilized for structural purposes should be compacted to 90 percent MPD within 2 percent of the OMC. A geotechnical engineer should review earthwork placement activities. 4.7 EXCAVATIONS Excavations should not remain open for extended periods of time, permitting wetting or drying of the bearing materials. Moisture changes of the bearing materials may increase the risk for movement. The materials encountered within the depth of excavations on site are generally categorized as Type C soils according to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Based on published OSHA guidelines, temporary excavations in the near surface Type C soils can have a maximum temporary slope of I.5:1.0 horizontal:vertical (H:V) or 30 degrees.. and F,ngineering Company Soils and Foundation Investieation, Job No. C051048 InTEC Page 7 Exceeding these inclinations will increase the chance of deformation, especially over a long time period. Some localized deformation of the bank may occur, especially during wet weather, loading or with vibrations. Care should be taken when working near the sides of excavations at all times, and the slopes should be monitored by onsite personnel during construction for evidence of sloughing, bulging ar toppling of the sidewalls or cracking at the ground surface. Surchazge loading at the top of the cut by equipment, materials, or vehicles must be avoided, since surcharge loading will increase the risk of caving. Spoils of the excavation must be placed a minimum of 3 horizontal feet from the edge of the excavation. We are providing OSHA information for preliminary planning purposes only. Final evaluation of excavations, excavation slopes and soil and bedrock materials exposed in excavations should be done during construction by the contractors "competent person" as required by OSHA guidelines. 5.0 LIMITATIONS Although the boring was located to obtain a reasonably accurate determination of foundation conditions, variations in the subsoil conditions are possible. If subsurface conditions or the proposed construction differ from those described herein, we should be notified. A representative of our office should observe foundation excavations and verify bearing stratum. The cost of construction observations is not included in this investigation. Evaluation of the site for past or present contamination of the soil or groundwater or for the presence of wetlands, surface contamination or hazazdous materials was beyond our scope of services for this project. I If we can be of further service in discussing the contents of this report, or in the analysis of the influence of subsurface conditions on the design of the structures, please contact us. Testing c.,;lc -A Fn,,.,tIat;nn TnvPCtivatinn inh No. C051048 PROPOSED RESIDENCE SCALE 3574 QUAIL STREET 7" = 30' - JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORADO PARTIAL SITE PLAN AND LOCATION JOB NO. C051048 OF EXPLORATORY TEST BORINGS FIGURE 1 TB-2 3.8°i s 0% 10 u u L ~ 15 L LJ 10 Min D 1 Day 20 0.3%1 6/12 WC= 24.3 DD= 95.3 7n2 s WC= 11.2 DD= 87.3 -200= 31 5/12 10 WC= 28.2 DD= 93.4 -200= 54.2 u u 6/12 15 WC= 20 a DD= 1092 LL 14/12 WC= 12.7 DD= 98.8 12/12 10 Min 1 Day~ 30 10/12 EXPLANATIONS: ~ CLAY WITH SAND, SOFT TO MEDIUM STIFF, E~ SAND WITH GRAVEL, LOOSE TO MEDIUM MEDIUM PLASTICITY, FINE TO MEDIUM DENSE, MEDIUM TO COARSE GRAINED, GRAINED SAND, MOIST TO WET, BROWN WET, BROWN TO TAN INDICATES DEPTH TO FREE WATER AND THE NUMBER OF DAYS AFTER DRILLING THE - MEASUREMENT WASTAKEN 0 4%T INDICATES REIATIVE MOVEMENT WHEN SAMPLE IS WETTED UNDER A PRESSURE OF 1000 POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT fl 7/12 INDICATES THAT 7 BLOWS OF A 140 POUND HAMMER FALLING 30 INCHES WERE REQUIRED TO DRIVE A 2.5 INCH O.D. SAMPLER 12 WCHES NOTES: 1. THE EXPIORATORY BORINGS WERE DRILLED ON 4-18-2005 USING A 4-INCH DIAMETER CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER POWERED BY CME 45 DRILLING RIG. 2. WC = WATER CONTENT DD = DRY DENSITY (PCF) -200 = PERCENT OF FINES PASSING THE NUMBER 200 SIEVE. JOB NO. C051048 LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2 TB-1 11 10 ~ i 9 8 ~ ~ 7 6 ~ 0 " m 5 ~ 4 W 3 Z i LDIT 1 0 0 CONSOLIDATION LINDER CONSTANT PRESSURE DUE TO WETTING -I _z -3 ~ ~ -4 ~ a -5 ~ -6 ~ _7 ~ i _g -9 -10 -11 0.1 JOB NO. C051048 1 10 APPLIED PRESSURE - ksf Sample of Sandy Clay From TB-1 @ 4' Natural Dry Unit Weight = 87.3 PCF Natural Moisture Content = 112 % CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULT 100 FIGURE 3 ii io fli 9 ~ 8 ~ 7 i 6 G 5 ~ 4 W 3 711 2 £ 1 \ o NO MOVEMENT HIM UNDER CONSTANT ' PRESSURE DUE TO WETTING _2 1 -3 ' s ~ ~ -4 ~ m ~ -5 C~. ~ U 6 i _7 i s : -9 -10 i -11 E I ~ Kill ~ 0.1 1 10 APPLIED PRESSURE - ksf Sample of Sandy Clay From TB-1 @ 9' Natural Dry Unit Weight = 93.4 PCF Natural Moisture Content = 28.2 % 100 70B N0. C051048 SWELL - CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 4 11 - 10 4 1 ' H H 9 I ~ 8 7 i I 6 i f Li 5 ~ W 3 i 2 ~ 1 0 ~ 0 CONS OLID ATI ON LJ N DE R CONST ANT PRESSURE DUE TO WETTING -1 ~ _Z -3 0 -4 ~ -5 I N a ~ o -6 U _g _g 5 -10 ! -11 0.1 1 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE - ksf Sample of Sandy Clay From TB-2 @ 2' Natural Dry Unit Weight = 95.3 PCF Natural Moisture Content = 24.3 % JOB NO. C051048 CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULT FIGURE 5 ~ CHURCH and ASSOCIATES, Inc. a division of In-TEC Inte¢rated Testine and Eneineerine Companv of Denver Metro LLC Geotechnical & on-Site Wastewater Engineering - Environmental & Geological Engineering - Construction Services - Phone:303-463-9317 Fax:303-463-9321 Gradation Test Results #200 1l100 450 #30 #16 #8 H4 3/8" 3/4" 1-12" 3" 0.01 0.1 1 10 Diameter of Parficle in Millimeters DESCRIPTION:Gravelly Sand From TB-1 @ 14' GRAVEL 4% SAND 63% FINES 33% MOISTURE 20.0% 100.0 90.0 80.0 70.0 ~ 60.0 ~ °i 50.0 c v V L QI 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 JOB NO. C051048 GRADATION TEST RESULT 0 10 20 30 v e 40 'A a" ~ SO V ~ V 4 60 70 BO 90 ]00 100 FIGURE 6 CHURCH and ASSOCIATES, Inc. a division of In-TEC Inteerated Testine and Eneineerine Comnanv of Denver Metro LLC Geotechnical & on-Site Wastewater Engineering - Environmental & Geological Engineering - Conshvction Services Phone:303-463-9317 Fax:303-463-9321 Gradation Test Results 100.0 90.0 80.0 70.0 ~ 60.0 p' 50.0 0 d V L a 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 0 ]0 20 30 a u 40 'v cz e 50 ~ d ~ 60 70 80 90 100 0.01 0.1 I 10 100 Diameter of Particle in Millimerers DESCRIPTION: Sandy Clay From TB-2 @ 19' GRAVEL 37% SAND 54% FINES 10% MOISTURE 12,7% JOB N0. C051048 GRADATION TEST RESULT FIGURE 7 Appendix A Important Information About The Report The data collected by InTEC of Denver Metro, LLC during this investigation was used to provide geotechnical information and recommendations regarding subsurface conditions on the site investigated, the effect of those conditions on the proposed construction, and the foundarion type for the named client. The stratification lines indicated on the boring log are approximate, and subsurface conditions encountered during construction may differ from those presented herein. This uncertainty cannot be eliminated because of the many vaziabilifies associated with geology. For example, material and engineering chazacteristics of soil and bedrock may change more gradually or more quickly than indicated in this report, and the actual engineering properties of non-sampled soil or rock may differ from interpretations. Quantitative conclusions, regazding the performance of geotechnical structures prior to construction are not possible because of the complexity of subsurface conditions. Rather, engineering judgments and experience are used to estimate likely geotechnical perforxnance and provide the necessary recommendations. Put another way, we cannot be sure about what is not visible, so the collected data and our training and experience are used to develop predictions and recommendations. There are no guazantees or warranties implied or expressed. The owner and/or client must understand that uncertainties are associated with geotechnical engineering, and they, the owner and/or client, must determine the level of risk they aze willing to accept for the proposed construction: The risks can be reduced, but not eliminated, through more detailed investigation, which costs more money and takes more time, and through any appropriate construction, which might be recommended as a result of that, more detailed investigation. To reduce the level of uncertainty, this report was prepazed only for the referenced client and for the proposed construction indicated in the report. Unless authorized by Church/InTEC in writing, the owner will assume additional geotechnical risk if this report is used for any construction that differs from that indicated in the report. Our firm should be consulted well before changes in the proposed construction occur, such as the nature, size, configuration, orientation, or location of any unprovements. Additionally, the knowledge and experience of the local geotechnical practice is continually expanding and it must be understood the presented recommendations were made according to the standard of pracrice at the tnne of report issuance. If the construction occurs 1 or more years after issuance of the report, the owner and/or client should contact our firm to determine if additional investigation or revised recommendations would be advisable. The geotechnical practice in the Denver Region must consider the risk associated with expansive soils and bedrock. The geotechnical practice in the Denver azea uses a relative scale to evaluate swelling potentials. When the sample is wetted under a surchazge pressure (loading) of 1000 pounds per squaze foot (PSF), the measured amount of swell is classified as low, moderate, high, or very high. Table 1 presents the relative classification criteria for the percentage of expansion based on initial sample height at the indicated surchazge pressure. Table 1 Risk Category Percent Swell Under a 1000 PSF Surchazge Pressure Low 0 - <2 Moderate 2 - <4 High 4 - <6 Very High 6 or Greater Sowce: Colorado Associarion of Geotechnical Engineers, Guideline for Slab Performance Risk Evalua6on and Residential Basement Floor System Recommendations (Denver Metropolitan Area), 1996 General Geotechnical Risk Discussion Page 2 The relative classification can be correlated to potential slab datnage as follows: Low: slab cracking, differential movement, and heave; moderate: slab cracking and differential movement, partial framing void and fumace plenum closure; and high to very high: large slab cracking and differential movement, closed voids, closed furnace plenum, and possible pipe rupture. (These effects aze based on monitoring and observations by several firms in the Denver metropolitan area and are not lnuited to the relative ciassification. More or less damage can occur in all classifications because of the uncertainty associated with subsurface conditions and geotechnical engineering.) It is unportant to note that measured swell or soil expansion is not the only geotechnical criteria for the type of floor and foundation recommendations. Additional criteria considered include: a. soil and bedrock type and variability, b. stratigraphy, c. ground water depth and anticipated post-construction moisture conditions, d. surface water drainage and features, e. post-construction landscaping and irrigation, f. construction details and proposed use, and g. local experience. Post-construction landscaping and owner maintenance will greatly affect structures on expansive soils and bedrock. Typically, irrigated landscaping increases the soil moishue content above the pre- construction water content. Slabs, pavaments, and structures significantly reduce evaporation of soil moisture. Therefore, post-construction heave and resulting damage to buildings and other improvements aze likely to occur on sites with expansive soils because of the high probability that subsurface moisture content will increase as the property and surrounding area is developed. Poor owner maintenance, such as negative slopes adjacent to foundation walls and irrigated landscaping adjacent to the foundation, also will significantly increase the risk of damage from expansive soil and bedrock. The property owner, and anyone he or she plans to sell the property to, must understand the risks associated with construction in an expansive soil azea and also must assume responsibiliry for maintenance of the structure. The owner and prospec6ve purchasers also should review "A Guide to Swelling Soils for Colorado Homebuyers and Homeowners," which is a special publication (SP 43) produced by the Colorado Geological Survey to assist homeowners in reducing damage caused by swelling soils. Af r-6~ 7'tiy- I ~o BACKFILL ~ WALL MIRAFI 140N OR EQUIVALENT GEOTEXTILE FABRIC CLEAN WASHED GRAVELII A POLYETHYLENE SHEETING ~~eQr'D o-p: ~a • • SLAB -~~p a:.p.o~ 9~ 0 o- O..o' ' d o~ - . o Q pQoo- o`.. : 12" Q~. ooQoa ~Q MIN 0e 0o o.~ ~0 . 4-INCH DIAMETER PERFORATED (INSTALL PVC PIPE MINIMUM SLOPE OF I I/8" PER FOOT FOR RIGID PIPE MINIMUM SLOPE OF V4" PER FOOT FOR FLEXIBLE PIPE DRAIN ABOVE LINE - NOTES: 1. DRAIN PIPE SHOULD LEAD TO SUMP OR P0517NE GRAVITY DISCHARGE. ' 2. COVER GRAVEL COMPLETELY WITH GEOTEXTILE W SANDY OR SILTY SOILS. 3. BO7TOM OF DRAIN SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES BELOW TOP OF SLAB AT HIGH POINT. 4. GRAVEL SPEGFICATIONS: CLEAN WASHED GRAVEL, 100 % PASSING I.5", 60-100% RETAINED #4, <3% PASSING #200 InTEC CHURCH &ASSOCiates, Ina adM~Tam of TYPICAL EXTERIOR m<ev~t=aresunama~o~~ea;naco,,of oenVerueo-e,uc Geoteol gASEMENT WALL DRAIN niml6 OnSlle VJaxtewWe~ Engineednp - Emd~rnmenial Geobgiml Epgineeting --(MVrutlimSeMws ' 4501 Wadsworth Boulevard Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Phone~(303) 4639317 ~ NOTES: 1. DRAIN PIPE SHOULD LEAD TO SUMP OR POSITIVE GRAVITY DISCHARGE. 2. COVER GRAVEL COMPLE7ELY WITH GEOTEXTILE IN SANDY OR SILTY SOILS. 3. BOTTOM OF DRAIN SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES BELOW TOP OF SLAB AT HIGH POINT. 4. GRAVEL SPEGFICATIONS: CLEAN WASHED GRAVEL, 100 % PASSING I.5", 60-100 % RETAWED #4, <3% PASSING #200 IIITEC CHURCH & Assoclates, Ina aaMsm~o+ TYPICAL INTERIOR inma,.~a resn~c ~,e E,vmeen~v cartro.nv w o.~~.er n+so-e. uc a~,BASEMENT WALL DRAIN 4501 Wadsworth Boulevard Wheat Ridge, Colorado80033 Phone:(303) 463-9317 ZeLurC vr iio rc:R rvvi i vn ~o~ ~...SLOPE OF I/4" PER FOOT FOR FLEXIBLE PIPE Page 1 SPECIFICATIONS FOR EARTHWORK 1.0 SCOPE Includes all clearing and grubbing, removal of obstructions, general excavating, grading and filling, and any related items necessary to complete the grading for the entire project in accordance with these specifications. 2.0 SUBSURFACE SOIL DATA Subsurface soil investigations have been made, and the results are available for examination by the contractor. The contractor is expected to examine the site and determine for himself the character of materials to be encountered. No additional allowance will be made for rock removal, site clearing and grading, filling, compaction, disposal, or removal of any unclassified materials. 3.0 CLEARING & GRUBBING A. GeneraL• Clearing and grubbing will be required for all areas shown on the plans to be excavated or on which fill is to be consriucted. B. Clearing: Clearing shall consist of removal and disposal of trees and other vegetation as well as down timber, snags, brush, existing foundations, slabs, utilities, and rubbish within the areas to be cleazed. C. Grubbing: Stumps, matted roots, and roots lazger than 2 inches in diameter shall be removed from within 6 inches of the surface of areas on which fills are to be constructed. D. Grass & Topsoil: Grass, grass roots, and incidental topsoil shall not be left beneath a fill area, nor shall this material be used as fill material. Grass, grass roots, and topsoil may be stockpiled and later used in the top 6 inches of fills outside roadways and building pads. 4.0 EARTH EXCAVATION A. Earth excavation shall consist of the excavation and removal of suitable soils for use as embankment or structural fill, as well as the satisfactory disposal of all vegetation, existing man-made fill, debris, and deleterious materials encountered within the area to be graded and/or in a bonow area. InTEC Project No. C051048 Page 2 B. Excavated areas shall be continuously maintained such that the surface shall be smooth and have sufficient slope to allow water to drain from the surface. 5.0 STRUCTURAL FILL & EMBANKMENT A. General: Embankinents shall consist of a controlled fill constructed in areas indicated on the grading plans. B. Materials: (1) Phvsical Characteristics: Structural fill material shall consist of soils that conform to the minimum following physical characteristics: Sieve Size Percent Passing (Square Openings) by Weipht 3 inch 100 No. 4 50-100 No. 200 15-60 The plasticity index of the material, as determined in accordance with ASTM D4318, shall not exceed 30. Results of our investigarion indicate that most of the near surface on-site soils will meet these requirements. However, some blending or importation of fill _ may be required. The fill materials shall be free from roots, grass, other vegetable matter, clay lumps, rocks lazger than 6 inches, or other deleterious materials. The existing site soils will be suitable for fill around the exterior of the building and are recommended for this use. (2) Borrow: When the quantity of suitable material required for all excavation and grading activities is not available within the limits of the jobsite, the contractor shal] provide sufficient materials to construct the grading requirements to the lines, elevations, and _ cross sections shown on the drawings from borrow areas. The contractor shall obtain from owners of said bonow areas the right to excavate material, shall pay all royalties and other charges involved, and shall pay all expenses in developing the source, including the cost of right-of-way required for hauling the material. C. Construction: (1) Buildina Area Treatment: Any existing man-made fill or other deleterious material encountered shall be removed in its entirety and replaced with structural fill. Prior to placement of fill; the building area shall be cazefully inspected by a representative of the geotechnical engineer to insure satisfactory removal of native soils and the removal of any existing man-made fill. Foundations shall bear on a minimum of two feet of InTEC Project No. C051048 Page 3 structural fill. Structural fill should extend a minimum of two feet beyond the perimeter of the footings. All footings must have concrete placed within a 72-hour period after establishment of finished subgrade, to avoid moisture loss. Once placed, footings and walls must be backfilled within 72 hours. Subgrade soils shall be protected during installation of the footings to minimize moisture loss. The exposed cut surfaces in soil, as well as surfaces to receive fill, shall be scarified to a minimum depth of 10 inches and moisture conditioned as necessazy to bring the upper 10 inches to optimum moisture content or above. The upper 10 inches of the native soils shall then be compacted to a minimum of 96 percent of maximum dry density as determined in accordance with ASTM D698. Where soft, wet soils are encountered at the bottom of cut surfaces, the surface may be stabilized by working lazge rock into the subgrade or utilization of lime stabilization or biasial geogrid reinforcement layer placed _ on the subgrade. This shall be done only at the discretion of the geotechnical engineer. Where vibratory compac6on equipment is used, it shall be the contractar's responsibility to insure that the vibrations do not damage neazby buildings or other adj acent property. (2) Compaction: Fill shall be spread in layers not exceeding 8 inches, watered as necessazy, and compacted. Moisture content at the time of compaction shall be 1 percent below optimum moisture or higher. A density of not less than 96 percent of maximum dry density within the building pad shall be obtained for the backfill around the footings and stem walls. A density of not less than 96 percent of maacimum dry density within the building pad shall be obtained for structural fill. Structural fill, as well as the native soils, outside the building pad azea shall be compacted to a minimum 90 percent of maximum dry density. Optimum moisture content and maximum dry density for each soil type used shall be detemuned in accordance with ASTM D698 for native soils and for structural fill. Compaction tests on exposed surfaces should only remain valid for 48 hours if there is no drastic change in existing weather conditions. (3) Weather Limitations: Controlled fill shall not be constructed when the atmospheric temperature is below 35 degrees F. When the temperature falls below 35 degrees, it shall be the responsibility of the contractor to protect all azeas of completed work against any detrimental effects of ground freezing by methods approved by the geotechnical engineer. Any areas that are damaged by freezing shall be reconditioned, reshaped, and compacted by the contractor in conformance with the requirements of this specification without additional cost to the owner. D. Slope Protection & Drainage: The edges of the controiled fill embankments shall be graded to the contours shown on the drawings and compacted to the density required in paragraph S.C (2). Slopes steeper than 1 vertical to 3 horizontal shall be protected from erosion. InTEC Project No. W51048 Page 4 6. INSPECTION & TESTS A. Field Inspecrion & Testing: The owner shall employ the services of a registered, licensed geotechnical engineer to observe foundation excavations and verify the bearing stratum. The geotechnical engineer shall provide continuous on-site observation by experienced personnel during construction of controlled earthwork. The on-site observer shall maintain a daily field log of all operations, observations, and test results. The contractor shall notify the engineer at least two working days in advance of any field operations of controlled ear[hwork, or of any resumption of operations after stoppages. Tests of fill materials and subgrade will be made at the following suggested minimum rates: (1) Daily written field observations of conshuction activities, not limited to, but including: weather conditions, equipment used by the contractor, moisture conditions of on-site soil, soils encountered during excavation or drilling, processes used by the contractor, daily progress, and deviations from specifications. (2) One fieid density test for each 500 square yards of original ground surface prior to placing fiil or constructing floor slabs. (3) One field density test for each 500 cubic yazds of fill placed or each layer of fill for each wark area, whichever is the greater number of tests. (4) One moisture-density curve for each type of material used, as indicated by sieve analysis and plasticity index. B. Report of Field Density Tests and Construction Observations: The representative of the geotechnical engineer shall submit, daily, the results of field density tests and construction observations required by these specifications to the geotechnical engineer of record, structural engineer, civil engineer and owner, within 48-hours of tests or observations. C. Costs of Tests & Inspection: The costs of tests, inspection and engineering, as specified in this section of the specifications, shall be bome by the owner. D. Scheduling of Tests & Inspection: The contractor or subcontractor whose work will be monitored shall provide the representative of the geotechnical engineer a minimum of 48 hours notice before commencement of earthwork activities, and 24 hours notice of cancellation of earthwork activities. InTEC Pxoject No. C051048 % I ~ Q r. ~ 7c" _ I I V ~ w in S. ~ n z CL ~ ~ cu 0 g U- O ots t1.. ' !m ~ C 0 ~ n 0 Fred & Donna's Addition 3575 Quail Street Wheat Ridge, CO Job # 05109 Calculations (Per Current IRC) Prepared by Jim A. Devish, P.E. Jones-Devish Consulting engineers 701 W. 48th. Avenue Denver, CO 80216 Voice: 303 293 8991 Fax: 303 293 8928 Item 1) Joist 2) Beams & Headers 3) Columns 4) Foundation Material Specifications: Table of Contents 1) Wood Beams & Headers: 2) LVL Beams: 3) Wood studs: 4) Steel: a) Plates and beams b) HSS columns c) Reinforcing: 5) Concretc: 7 Page 11-3.1 4.1-20.2 21.1-22.1 22.1 Fb= 950 psi., Fv=75 psi, E=1500000 psi 1.9E Fb= 875 psi., Fc=1300 psi, E=1600000 psi Fy=36 ksi F}r46 ksi Fy= 40 ksi #4 & smaller, F}r690 ksi, #5 and lazger c..- ^,cnn n 28 days Fred 8 Donna's Residence 3575 Quail Street Wheat Ridge, CO #05109 1) TJIs Loading: a:= tb•in L:= 14.5-ft pdl 17.5•psf p1j:=40•psf wdl Pdl*a NI = 23.3331bR ~ (ull:= p1l•a mp = 533331b8 I wT wdl + 0)11 (OT = 76.6671b8 1 Use 11 718" TJI/PRO 110 @ 16" o.c. coIlallow:= 76.5•psf (MallaW 105.0'psf . W11 < COtlallow @ Dt,L L 480 OKi wTL < r)TT,allow OKI R= O)T• 2 R= 555.8331b Use IUS1.81/11.88 face mount hanger, or 1T711.88 top flange hanger 2) TJis Loading: a = 16•in L = 21.0•ft Pdt = 17.5•psf pll= 40-psf (Odl Pdl•a wdl = 233331b8 1 wli PII'a wp = 533331bR I wT O)dl + 0)(1 O)T = 76.6671btt t Use 11 7/8" TJI/PRO 560 @ 16" o.c. wilallow 67.0•psf O)TLallow 113.5 •psf ~ wII ~ wllallow @ ALL L 480 OK. COTL 03TLallow OK! Jones Devish Consulting Engineers 303 293 8991 Jim A. Devish P.E. 1) TJls.mcd 1 oYL Fred & Donna's Residence 3575 Quail Street Wheat Ridge, CO #05109 R O)T- 2 R = 8051b Usa lUS3.56111.88 face mount nanger, or 1T-i 411.88 top flange hanger 3) TJIs Loading: a:= 16-in L:=22.5•ft Pd1:= 17.5•psf P11:=4O-psf wdi pdl•a wd1 = 233331b8 ~ cult pll•a wi1 = 533331b8 t wT wdI T wli COT =?6.b67,b8 1 Use 11 7/8" TJI/PRO 560 @ 16" o.c. wllallow:= 56.0-psf wTLallow = 116.0•psf ~ wIl < ~llallow @ ALL L 480 OK. cU7y < w1l,allow OK! R:=wT-~ R=862.S1b Use IUS3.56/11.88 face mount hanger, or ITT411.88 top flange hanger Jones Devish Consuiting Engineers 303 293 8991 Jim A. Devish P.E. 1) TJls.mcd 2of2 Fred 8 Donna's Residence Jim A. Devish P.E. 3575 Quail Street 4) SS w UL.mcd Wheat Ridge, CO 1of2 4) Simple span joist with uniform load Loading: A P'd1:= 17.5•psf p'p:=40-psf W r a:=5.5-8 L:=5.0•R ~ (Odl = P'dl'a uodl = 96.251b8 L , Ri R, 1 Beam Diagram wp:= p'p•a wil = 220fb8 uot:=mdj+cup wt=316.251b8~ Check 2x12 Him Fir #1: Attributes: F6:= 950•psi F,= 75-psi Fp,= 405•psi E:= 1500000-psi t:= 1.5•in d= 1125•in Cp:= lA (OCC) CL:= 1 CT:= 1.0 Cp = I.0 , a.-= t•d A = 16.875in- 2 S:= t- 6 S= 31.641 in3 3 I t.d2 I = 177.979in4 Shear. ~ L Rmax= Rmax = 790.6251b 2 a,:= 1.5•RA~ av=70.278psi F',:= CD•F, F, = 75psi a, F', OK! Bearing: F'cper FcpcT Rmax A:=- 'cper A = 1.952 in2 lreqd A lreqd = 1.301 in lprovd:= 1.5•in Ireqd < lProvd OKI Jones Devish Consulting Engineers 303 293 8991 Fred & Donna's Residence 3575 Quail Street Wheat Ridge, CO Flexure: LZ M;= wt• g M 6(. $ F'6:= CD-CL•Cp•CT Fb af F'y OK! Deflection: M = 988.281 Ibft ap = 374.815 psi F'y = 950psi 360 - 0.167in 40 = 0.125in 5•w~~•L4 384-E•I L A~- 480 J = 0.012 in OK! Use 2x12, with U210 face mount hanger or W212 top flange hanger Jones Devish Consulting Engineers 303 293 8991 Jim A. Devish P.E. 4) SS w UL.mcd 2of2 Fred & Donna's Residence 3575 Quail Street Wheat Ridge, CO Jim A. Devish P.E. 4a) SS w UL.mcd tof2 4a) Simple span joist with uniform load: Loading: A P'd1:=17.5•psf p'p:=40•psf wT a:= 16•in L:= 8S-ft wdl P'dl'a mdI = 233331bfl 1 T ~ ' R, R~ rup = p'll•a ~p = 533331b8 1 eeam Diagram 6671bft 1 (o = 76 = w +0) . t (0t : dt II Check 2x12 Him Fir #1: Attributes: Fb:= 950•psi F,,:= 75•psi Fcper:= 405•psi E= 1500000•psi t:= I.5•in d:= 11.25•in Cp:= 1.0 (OCC) CL 1 Cr:= LO Cp: = 1.0 A = t-d A = 16.875in2 2 S:=t•6 5=31.641in3 3 I= 177.979 in4 I. t• d 2 Shear. wt•L Rmax : 2 Rmae av:= 1.5• A F'v:= CD•Fv a, F'„ OK! Bearing: F'cper:= Foper Rmax A - F'cper A = 0.805 in2 A Rmax = 325.8331b a, = 28.963psi F, = 75 psi lreqd t Ireqd = 0.536 in lprovd I .5 •in lreqd < lprovd OKI Jones Devish Consulting Engineers 303 293 8991 Fred & Donna's Residence 3575 Quail Street Wheat Ridge, CO Flexure: LZ M wt' 3 M Qf. S F'b CD'CL'CF'Cr'Fb v f F'b OK! Deflection M = 6923961bft af = 262.598psi F'y = 950psi 360 - 0.283 in 480 = 0.213 in 5•wll•L4 A = 0.023 in 384•E•I A L OK! 480 Use 2x12 @ 16" o.c. , with U210 face mount hanger Jones Devish Consulting Engineers 303 293 8991 Jim A. Devish P.E. 4a) SS w UL.mcd 2of2 Fred & Donna's Residence 3575 Quail Street Wheat Ridge, CO #05109 5) Simple span beam with uniform and point load: Loading: ddl 17.5-os P'll 40-psf a:=0.67-ftL:=14.5•ft b:=10.0•ft c=L - b c =4.5ft (Odl P'd1,a wdl = 11.725168 1 wit P'II•a coIl = 26.81b8 I O)t wdl + wtl (ot = 38.5251b8 I Pdl 295-1b P11:= SOO-Ib Pt Pdl + PII Pt = 79516 Jim A. Devish P.E. 5) ML SS w UL.& PL.mcd 1 of2 0 WT P , ~1 q 1 n <1 R7 L R2 Beam Diagram Check (2) 1 3/4"x11 1/4" x 1.9 E LVL Beam Attributes Fb:= 2600•psi F, 285•psi Fcpe,:= 750•psi E= 1900000•psi 3.5-in d:= 1125-in (12-in\.I11 Cp 1.0 (Occ) CI:= 1 CF I d I Cp = 1.007 \ l A:= t•d A= 39.375 in2 2 3 S:= t- 6 S= 73.828 in3 I:= t• a I= 415.283 in4 Shear. wt•L Pt•c Rt + L Rt = 326.031b 2 o)t•L Pt•b RZ 2+ L RZ = 827.5821b Rma~= R2 a,:= I.S-RA~ av = 31.527psi v CD'iv r'v = -35psi av < Fv OK! Bearing F'cper = Fcper Jones Devish Consulting Engineers 303 293 8991 Fred & Donna's Residence 3575 Quail Street Wheat Ridge, CO #05109 A:= Rm A= I.103 in2 Fcper A lrzud t l•eyd = C.315 in iprovd: S.S-in lreqd<lProvd OK! Flexure: @ point load x b wt•x•(L-x) Pt-b-x MX:= 2 + L MX = 6349.57116ft @ midspan x:= 2 wt•x•(L - x) Pt-b•x i''(cl 2 f L Mcl = a987.485IbR Mmax:= Mx Mmac af:= S af= 1032.057psi Fb CD'CL'CF'Fb F'b = 2618.693psi ab < F'b OK! Deflection: L 480 - 0363 in [b•(b k 2•c)~.5 x:= 3 x=7.958ft Jim A. Devish P.E. 5) ML SS w UL.& PL.mcd 2of2 AX:= O)IX •(L3-2•L•xZ+x3) + •[b•c.(b+2•c)-[3.6.(6+2•c)]'S1 OX=0.09in 24•Ed 27•E•1•L L x:=- x=7.25R 2 A'A wll'X (L3-2•Lx2+x3) + Pll •[b•c.(b+2•c)•[3-b•(6+2•c)]'S] Oc1=0.091in 24•E•I 27-E-I•L A < ~ OK! 480 Use (2) 1 3/4"x11 114" x 1.9 E LVL Beam with HU412 facemount hanger or GN3,56/11.25 top flange hanger Jones Devish Consulting Engineers 303 293 8991 Fred & Donna's Residence 3575 Quail Street Wheat Ridge, CO #05109 6)Simple span beam with uniform toad : Loading: P'dt 17.5 -psf p'p 40•psf a:= 21-ft L:= 23.17-ft (Odl P'dl'a wdl = 3675 lb8 ~ o)II P'll•a o)II = 8401b8 t O)t wdl + wll wt = 1207.51b8 ~ Check W12x35: Attributes: Fy:=36•ksi E:=29000•ksi Lb:=2.0•ft Lc:=6.9•ft L~: 7.1•ft Aprevd:= 103•in2 S:= 45.6in3 I:= 285.0•in4 T:= 10.5•in tH,:= 30-in k:= 1.0 in NeXi:= 3•in Shear: F,:= .4•Fy F, = 14.4ksi RI (ot• 2 RI = 13988.8881b R 6v av = 4.441 ksi f.tµ, av < Fv OK! Exterior Web Crippling: Rmax:_ .66•Fy•(NeXj + 2.5k) tN, Rmax = 39204 tb RI< Rmax OKI Flexure: Lb L„ Fb:= .66•Fy Fb = 23.76ksi z M:=tut- 8 M=81.03kkip•ft ab M 66 = 21324ksi ab < Fb OK! Jones Devish Consulting Engineers 303 293 8991 Jim A. Devish P.E. 6) SS w UL.mcd 1 of2 e wT 1 ~•-,-rT,~ ~ L F~ Ri Beam Diagram Fred & Donna's Residence Jim A. Devish P.E. 3575 Quaii Street 6) SS w UL.mcd Wheat Ridge, CO 2oY2 #05109 Deflection: L - = 0.772 in 360 a 0:= 5• ~~t L 4= 0.659in 384•E-I o < L OK! 360 Use W12x35: Bear both ends on top of column with a 1/2"x6 1/2"x0'-10" Cap plate,provide (4) 1/2" A307 bolts and provide 1/4" gusset ea side of beam. Cantilever beam 2'-6' to carry reaction from W12x16 beam with a 1/4" single plate connection w(3) A325 bolts. Jones Devish Consulting Engineers 303 293 8991 Fred 8 Donna's Residence 3575 Quail Street Wheat Ridge, CO #05109 7) Simple span beam with uniform 8 point load: loading: P'd1:= 15•psf p'II:=40•psf a:=17.5-ft L:=23.17•ft b: 10.5-ft c:=L - b c =12.67ft wdl P'dl•a wdl = 262.51b8 ~ I wt! P'II'a (oII = 7001bti O)t (Odl + cOII wt = 962.5168 t Pdl 305•Ib P11:= 525•tb Pt Pdl + PIl Pt = 8301b Check W12x53: AtYributes: Fy:= 36•ksi E:= 29000.ksi Ly:= 1.33•ft L,:= 10.6•ft Lu:= 22.0-ft Aprovd:= 15.6•in2 S:= 70.6-in3 I:= 425.0•in4 T:= 9.5-in tW : 37•in k:= 125•in Next 6'in Nint = b'in Shear: F,:= .4•Fy F, = 14.4ksi wi•L Pt-c RI 2+ L RI = 11604.431b cut•L Pt•b RZ 2+ L RZ = 11526.6951b Rmac R2 6° . T t~ aV = 3.279ksi w aV < Fv OK! Exterior Web Crippling: Rmu .66 •FY • (Next + 2.5k)tH, R2 ~5 Rmar OK! Interior Web Crippling: Rmax:_ .66-Fy (Nint + Sk) tµ, pt < Rma, OK! Rmu = 80219.71b Rmm = 1.077 x 1051b Jones Devish Consulting Engineers 303 293 8991 Jim A. Devish P.E. 7) SS w UL & PLmcd 10@ E w, P ` I R1 L c R2 b Beam Diagram Fred 8 Donna's Residence 3575 Quail Street Wheat Ridge, CO #05109 Flexure: Le < Lb < Lu Fb .66-Fy Fb = 23.76ksi @ ?aint load x c ot•x•(L - z) Pt•b•x MX' 2 + L @ midspan x z L wt•LZ z MCI 8 + MX- b Mmaac Mcl 6h MSa, 6b = 23.879ksi ab _ Fy OK! Deflection: L - = 0.579in 480 rb•(b + 2•c)1.5 x:=L 3 J x=11.2ft MX = 68J89kip•ft Mcl = 140.486kip•R pX:= wIX •(L3-2-L•x2+x3) + Ptl •[b•a(b+2•c).[3.b{b+2•c)]'S1 24-E-I 27-E-I-L x:= 2 x= 11.585 ft@ midspan Qct._ WII'X (L3_2•L•x2+x3) + •[b.c•(b+2•c)•[3•b•(b+2c)J'S1 24•E•I ~ 27•E•I•L 4 < L OK! 480 Jim A. Devish P.E. 7) SS w UL & PL.mcd 2of2 OX = 0.387 in Acl = 0387in Use `N12x53: Bear both ends cn ?ep of cclumn with a 112"x10".c0'-10" C2p piate,previde (4)4/^_" A307 bolts and provide 1/4" gusset ea side of beam. Cantilever beam 2'-6' to carty reaction from W 72x16 beam with a 1l4" single plate connection w(3) A325 bolts. Jones Devish Consulting Engineers 303 293 8991 Fred & Donna's Residence Jim A. Devish P.E. 3575 Quail Street 8) SS w UL.mcd Wheat Ridge, CO 1of2 #05109 8)Simple span beam with uniform load Loading: B p'dl IS•psf p'p:= 40•psf ~WT q a:=21-ft L:= 14.5•ft 1 L ~ I ~dl P'dl'a wdl = 3151b8 ~ Ri Beam Diagram I wtt P'ti'a (oII = 8401b8 O)t = 0)dl +w11 wt = 11551bft ~ Check W12x16: Attributes: Fy:=36•ksi E:=29000-ksi Lb:=2.0-ft Lc:=4.1•ft L~:=4.3•ft Aprovd:=4.71•in2 S:= 17.1in3 103.0•in4 T:= 10.5•in tµ.:= 22-in k:= .8750•in Next 3'in Shear: F,:= .4•Fy F, = 14Aksi Rl wt• Z RI = 8373.751b R 6v:_ aV = 3.625ksi T•tW av < Fv OK! Exterior Web Crippling: Rmax:_ .66-Fy(Next + 2.5k)tW Rmax = 27116.1 lb Rl Rmax OK! Flexure: Lb _ L~ Fb .66•Fy Fb = 23.76ksi 2 M:= wi. 8 M= 30.355kip-ft 66 S Qb = 21302ksi ab < Pb OK! Jones Devish Consulting Engineers 303 293 8991 Fred & Donna's Residence Jim A. Devish P.E. 3575 Quail Street 8) SS w UL.mcd Wheat Ridge, CO 2oY2 #05109 Deflection: L - = 0.483 in 360 CUi]-L 4 A :=5• 0=0.28in 384•E•I A< - OKI 360 Use W12x16 beam, hang end of beam from cantilevered beam as previously stated, bear beam on 1/2" x4"x0'-10" Cap plate, provide (4) 1/2" A307 bolts and provide 1/4" gusset ea side of beam Jones Devish Consulting Engineers 303 293 8991 Fred & Donna's Residence 3575 Quail Street Wheat Ridge, CO #05109 9) Simple span beam with uniform 8 point load: Loading: p'al:= IS•psf p'll:= 40•psf a:=ll.5•ft L:=23.33•R 6:=3-ft c:=L - b c =20.33ft (Odl P'dl'a 0)dl = 172.51b$ I I wjl= p'lpa wll = 4601bR rut wdl + wp mt = 6325Ib$ I Pdl 800•Ib PII:= 1600db Pt Pdl + Pll Pt = 2400Ib Check W18x46: Attributes: Fy:= 36•ksi E:= 29000•ksi Lb:= 133•ft L~:= 10.6•ft Lu:= 22.0•ft Aprovd:= 15.6•in2 S:= 78.8-in3 I:= 712.0•1 4 T:=15.5•in tW:=.36•in k: 1:25•in Next:=6•in NNt:=6•in Shear: F,= .4•Fy F, = 14.4ksi cnt•L Pt-c RI + RI = 9469.497Ib 2 L tuj•L Pt•b RZ + RZ = 7686.7281b Z L Rmax R2 ~ Qv:= .j.m w 6v = 1378ksi aV < F, OK! Exterior Web Crippling: Rmax:_ .66•Fy•(Next + 2.5k) tw, RZ < RmyX OK! Interior Web Crippling: Rmax .66. Fy-(Nint + Sk) tµ, Pt Rmax OK! RmyX = 78051.61b Rma~ = 1.048 x I OS lb Jones Devish Consulting Engineers 303 293 8991 Jim A. Devish P.E. 9) SS w UL & PL.mcd 1 of2 E Wi PI R, ~ Ra 8eam Diegram Fred & Donna's Residence 3575 Quail Street Wheat Ridge, CO #05109 Flexure: Le < Lb < Lu Fb .66 •Fy Fb = 23.76 ksi @ point load x c o)t.x-(L - x) Pt.b•x MX_ + 2 L L @ midspan x:= z L uot•LZ 2 Met = 8 + MX• b Mmax Mcl Mmax ab. S 6b > pb Deflection: L 480 - 0.583in 6b = 21.689ksi OK! rb•(b+2•c)1.9 X'- L 3 ~ x= 6.608R Mx = 25.562kip•ft MCI = 142.427kip•R wll'X 3 2 3 PIl px:=-•~L -2•L•x +x~+ •[b•c-(b+2•c)•[3•b•(b+2•c)]' 5] 24-E•I 27•E-I•L x: z x= 11.665ft @ midspan Qc1'_ '0Il'X (L3-2-L~x2+x3) + Ptl •[b•c•(b+2.c)•[3•b•(b+2•c)]'S~ 24•E•I 27•E•I~L A < 480 OK! Jim A. Devish P.E. 9) SS w UL 8 PL.mcd 2of2 4X = 0.127 in Acl = 0.16in Use W18x46: Bear both ends on top of column with a 1/2"x6"x0'-10" Cap plate,provide (4) 1/2" A307 boits and provide 114" gusset ea side of beam. Cantilever beam 2'-6' to carry reaction from W12x16 beam with a 1/4" single plate connection w(3) A325 bolts. Attach perpendicular W18X46 to W18x46 beam with a minimum of (3) A325-N bolts. Verify quanity and plate location with Architect Jones Devish Consulting Engineers 303 293 8991 Fred & Donna's Residence 3575 Quail Street Wheat Ridge, CO #05109 10) Simple span beam with uniform load: Loading: P'dl:= 17.5•psf p'll:=40-psf a:=725-ft L:= 14.5•ft Wdi P'dl'a wdI = 126.8751b8 1 (oII P'11'a I (oII = 2901b8 O)t O)dl + all wt = 416.8751b8 I Jim A. Devish P.E. 10) ML SS w UL.mcd 1of2 A WT 1 L / R, Ri Beam Diagram Check (2) 1 3/4"x11 1/4" x 1.9E LVL Beam: Attributes F6:= 2600•psi F,:= 285•psi F,p,,:= 750•psi E:= 1900000•psi t:= 3.5-in d:= 1125•in (12 inl 111 Cp 1.0 (OCC) CL 1 Cp I a •I Cp = 1.007 \ l A:= t•d A= 39375 in2 2 3 St• 6 S= 73.828 in3 I:= t-d2 I= 415283 in4 Shear: mt L Rmax:= Rmm = 30223441b 2 Rmac av:= 1.5• A 6, = 115.137psi F'v CD'Fv F'v = 285 psi 6v< F'v OK! Bearing F'cper Fcper Rmac A:=- F'cper A = 4.03 in2 A Ireqd L lreqd = 1.151 in lpmvd:= 5.5•in lreqd < lprovd OK! Jones Devish Consulting Engineers 303 293 8991 Fred & Donna's Residence 3575 Quail Street Wheat Ridge, CO #05109 Flexure: 2 Tv1:= wt- B M= 10955.99616ft 6f:= S 6f=1780.784psi F'b:=Cp-CL•Cp-Fb F'b = 2618.693 psi 6p < F'b pK! Deflection: 360 - 0.483 in 480 = 0.363 in 5 •wdl•L4 ~ 384-&I 4 = 0.16in 4 < 480 ~KI Use (2) 1 3/4"x 11 114" x 1.9 E LVL Beam, bear on (2) 2x trimmers ea end Jones Devish Consulting Engineers 303 293 8991 Jim A. Devish P.E. 10) ML SS w ULmcd 2of2 Fred & Donna's Residence 3575 Quail SVeet Wheat Ridge, CO #05109 11) Simple span beam with uniform load: Loading: a P'dt:= 15.0•psf p'tl:= 30•psf a:= 11.0-ft L:= 16.75•ft I O)dl P'dl•a wdl = 1651b$ t wp = p'p•a wp = 3301b8 Ot wdl + 0)11 cot = 4951b tt t Jim A. Devish P.E. 11) ML SS w UL.mcd 1 of2 wT T L T R, Ri Beam Diagrem Check (2) 1 3/4"x13 1/4" x 1.9E LVL Beam: Attributes F6:=2600•psi F,:= 285•psi Fcpc,:= 750•psi E. 1900000•psi t: 3.5•in d:= 1325•in Cp:= 115 (Snow C (1z.9n)•1tl ) L~= i ~F \ d/ J CF = 0.989 A:= t•d A= 46375 inz 2 3 S:= t. 6 S= 102.411 in i:= t- a2 I= 678.476 in4 Shear: out•L Rmax z Rma, = 4145.6251b R ~ a,:= 1.5• A a, = 134.09psi F',:= Cp•Fv F, = 327.75 psi 6, < F', OK! Bearing F'cper Fcper Rma~ A - F'~~ A = 5.527 inZ ireqd ~ lreqd = 1.579 in lprovd 5.5 •in lreyd < iprovd OK! Jones Devish Consulting Engineers 303 293 8991 Fred & Donna's Residence Jim A. Devish P.E. 3575 Quail Street 11) ML SS w UL.mcd Wheat Ridge, CO 2of2 #05109 Flexure: 2 M:= out• 8 M= 17359.8051bR af S af = 2034.124psi F'b CD'CL'CF'Fb F'b = 2957.293 psi ap F'y OK! Deflection: 3~ = 0.558in 480 - 0A19in 5 •Cudl •L4 4 384•E-I 4 = 0.227in A < L OK! 480 Use (2) 1 3/4"x 13 1/4" x 1.9 E LVL Beam, bear on (2) Vimmers ea end: Jones Devish Consulting Engineers 303 293 8991 Fred & Donna's Residence 3575 Quail Street Wheat Ridge, CO Jim A. Devish P.E. 12) SS w UL.mcd 1 oY2 12) Simple span joist with uniform load: Loading: A p'dl:= 15.0•psf p'll: 30•psf Wr a:= ll.o-ft L:= 8.75•ft I I I I wdl = P'di•a wdl = 1351b8 1 ' L ' R~ R, i wII P'11'a o)II = 2701bft Beam Diagram = 4051b8 I + _ O)t : uOll wt O)dl Check 2x12 Him Fir#1: Attributes: P6:= 950•psi F, = 75•psi Fcper:= 405•psi EI500000•psi t:= 3.0•in d:= 11.25•in Cp 1.15 (SnOw) CL 1 C,:= 1.0 Cp 1.0 A:= t-d A= 33.75 inZ 2 3 S:= t• 6 S= 63.281 in 3 I:= b d I= 355.957 in4 Shear: wi•L Rmax. 2 Rmax vv:= 1.5• A F',:= CD-F„ aV 5 F'v OK! Bearing: F'cper = Fcper Rmae A - F'cper A = 4375 in2 A Rmax = 1771.8751b a, = 78.75psi F', = 86.25psi Ireqd I Ireqd = 1.458 in lprovd 1.5•in lreqd < lprovd OK! Jones Devish Consulting Engineers 303 293 8991 Fred 8 Donna's Residence Jim A. Devish P.E. 3575 Quail Street 12) SS w UL.mcd Wheat Ridge, CO 2of2 Flexure LZ M:= wt• g M= 47373051bft M ap:= S af=898333psi F'b CD'CL'CF'Cr'Fb F'b = 1092.5psi af F'b OK! Deflection L L -60 =0.292in -480 =0.219in 3 5•wp•L4 ~ 4 = 0.082 in 384-E-I 0 ~ OKI 480 Use (2) 2x12, bear on (2) trimmers ea. end Jones Devish Consulting Engineers 303 293 8991 Fred 8 Donna's Residence 3575 Quail Sheet Wheat Ridge, CO #05109 13)Simple span beam with uniform load : Loading: P'di 15•psf p'll;= 30•psf ~ a = 18.5-ft L:= 22.5-ft cDdl = P'dCa cudi = 277.5 1b8 ~ Wtl P'll•a 1 (oll = SSSIbf£ wt wdl +cOII wt = 832.5 Ibft 1 Check W12x30: Attributes: Fy:= 36•ksi E:= 29000•ksi Lb: 2.0•ft Lc:= 6.9•ft Lu:= 10.8•ft Aprovd:= 8.793•in2 S:= 38.6in3 I:= 238.0•in4 T:= 10.5•in tW:= 26-in k= I.0•in Next;= 3'in Shear: Fv:=.4-Fy F, = 14.4ksi Ri (ni• 2 RI = 9365.6251b R av:= T_t v, = 3.431 ksi w a, < Fv OK! Exterior Web Crippling: Rmax:_ .66•Fy(NeXt + 2.Sk)tµ. Rmax = 33976.81b Rt < Rmax OK! Flexure: Ly L~ Fb =.66•Fy Fb = 23.76ksi 2 M:= wt• $ M = 52.682kip•ft ab:= S ab= 16378ksi 6y < Fb OK! Jones Devish Consulting Engineers 303 293 8991 Jim A. Devish P.E. 13) SS w UL.mcd 10@ s Wr T ~ T R, R, Beam Dieptam Fred 8 Donna's Residence 3575 Quail Street Wheat Ridge, CO #05109 Deflection: L - = 0.563 in 480 a wp•L A :=5. 384•E~[ L ~ < 480 4 = 0.464 in OK! Jim A. Devish P.E. 13) SS w Ul..mcd 2of2 Use W12x30, bear one end on 1/2"x6 1/21"x 10" plate w(4) 1/2" A307 bolts: Attach opposite end to W18 with 1/4" single plate and (3) 3/4" A325-N bolts Jones Devish Consulting Engineers 303 293 8991 Fred & Donna's Residence 3575 Quail Street Wheat Ridge, CO #05109 14) Cantilevered roof joist with uniform load: Loading: p'dl:= 15•psf p'11:= 30•psf a:= 24•in L:= 6.5•ft 6:= 3.0•ft Odl P'dl•a o)Il P'II•a wt = wdl + wll wdl = 30168 t cup = 601b8 t (ut = 901b8 " Try 2x6 Him Fir, #1: Attributes Fb:= 950-psi F,:= 75•psi Fcper: 405•psi E= I500000•psi t:= 1.5•in Cp 1.15 (Snow) CL 1 C,:= 1.15 Cp 12 2 Jim A. Devish P.E. 14) Cant w UL.mcd 1 of2 WT L b RI R2 Beam Diagram d:= 5.25•in A:= t•d A= 7.875 in 2 S:= t• 6 S= 6.891 in3 3 I t•a2 I = 18.088in4 Shear. (Maximum shear occurs at cantilever end when both spans are loaded) Rm~ ~t •(L + b)Z Rm~ = 624.8081b Rmin:= w •(LZ - bz) Rmun = 230.1921b 2•L 2•L vv:= 1.5 • RA a, = 119.011 psi F'v:= CD•F„ F', = 86.25 psi av<_ F'„ OK! Bearing FcPe,.'= Fm Rmax A:= p~Wr A= 1.543 inZ lreqd A Ireqd = 1.028 in iprovd:= 1.5-in lreqd < lprovd OK! Jones Devish Consulting Engineers 303 293 8991 Fred & Donna's Residence 3575 Quail Street Wheat Ridge, CO #05109 Flexure: (maximum moment occurs when only the simple span is loaded) LZ M:= (Ot• 8 M= 950.625Ibft M 6f:= S 6f=372.047psi F'b = CD'CF'CL'Cr'Fb F'b = 1507.65psi 6p < p'b pKi Deflection: Maximum deflection occurs when only the simple span is loaded) L L 240 - 0325 in 480 = 0163 in Sw~~L4 4 4 = 0.029in 384E•I Jim A. Devish P.E. 14) Cant w UL.mcd 2of2 L 4 -480 OK! Use 4x8 @ 48" o.c., Attach to wall with U26 face mount hanger and a H2.5 hurricane clip @ beam Jones Devish Consulting Engineers 303 293 8991 Fred & Donna's Residence Jim A. Devish P.E. 3575 Quail Street 15) SS w UL.mcd Wheat Ridge, CO 1 of2 #05109 15) Simpie span jolsi wiih uniform load: Loading: A P'dl 210•psf p'p 420•psf Wr a:= 1.0-ft L:= 19.0-ft wdl P'dl'a wdl = 2101b8 1 ~ R, Ri t Beam Diagram wil:=p'pa w11=4201b8 0)t (0dl +0)II o)t = 63016tt I Check 10x14 Doug Fir #1 Attributes: Fb:= 1350•psi F,:= 85•psi Fcpe,:= 625-psi E= 1700000-psi t:= 9.5•in C 1.15 Snow C 1 C 1.0 12.~ •~il D = ~ ) L r CF ( a ~ Cp = 0.987 A:= t d A= 123.25 inZ 2 S:= t• 6 S= 288.563 in3 3 I t.d2 I = 1947.797in4 Shear: (ot•L Rmax 2 Rmy., = 598516 aV:= 1.5. RA~ a, = 70psi F'v CD'Fv F'v = 97J5 psi av < F'v OK! Bearing: F'cper = Fcper Rmas A:=- Tcper A = 9.576 inz lreqd A t Ireqd = 1.008 in lprovd I.S -in Ireqd < lprovd OKI d:= 13.S-in Jones Devish Consulting Engineers 303 293 8991 Fred & Donna's Residence Jim A. Devish P.E. 3575 Quail Street 15) SS w UL.mcd Wheat Ridge, CO 2of2 #05109 Flexure: 2 M:= cut• 8 M= 28428.75Ibft 6f = af = 1182222psi S F'6:= Cp-CL•Cp•CT Fb F"b = 1532335psi 6f < p'b pK1 Deflection: 8 - 0.633 in = 0.475 in 4 0 360 5•u)ll•L4 ;84-E-I L ~ 5 480 -A = 0.372in OK! Use 10X14 Timber Beam, bear on top of 10X10 wood column, attach w(2) 1/4" thick T plates with (3) 3/4" A307 bolts in ea member 16) Stair landing, use 3x6 tongue and grooved planking. Jones Devish Consulting Engineers 303 293 8991 Fred & Donna's Residence 3575 Quail Street Wheat Ridge, CO #05109 17) Cantilevered roof rafter with collar tie : Loading: a:= 2.0•ft Lh:= 4.625•ft H:= 3-ft l p'dl 10•psf. LLh I p'dl = 14.141 Ibft Z l p'pS 30•psf Ce 1.0 I= 1 .1 P's Ce't'P'lls P's = 30Ibft ` wdl P'dl•a wdl = 28.281 Ib8 I 1 (alt P's'a mp = 601btt (Ot = Odl +(O11 wt = 88281 lbtt I Oerermine Reactions: EFy 0 R:= wt•(Lh + Le) R= 408.31b EMR 0 Z Lc 2) T= 314.731 lb T:= wt (L2H cmx p Lh LC2 x:= ~ • 1- 2 Lh 2 x MX. TH- wt2 Lc:= 0•ft Ld 6.54ft x=2313ft H':=H•!1- X I ` Lh) MX = 236.0481bft H' = 1.5 ft Jim A. Devish P.E. 17) Rafter W Collar Tie. mcd 1 of3 N W T ~-F- Ld/ T Z H Ln i► T Lc,R Beam Diagrem Check 2x8 Him Fir #1: Attributes: Fb:= 950•psi F,:= 75-psi Fcp,r:= 405•psi E:= 1500000•psi t:= 1.5•in d:= 725•in Cp:= 1.15 (Snow) CL= l C,:= 1.15 Cp:= 12 A:= t-d A= 10.875 inz 2 3 Sb 6 S= 13.141 in3 I:= ri dZ I= 47.635 in4 Jones Devish Consulting Engineers 303 293 8991 Fred & Donna's Residence 3575 Quail Street Wheat Ridge, CO q05109 Shear: R a,:= 1.5-A a, = 56317psi F'v CD'Fv F'v = 86.25psi 6y < F'v OK! Bearing: F'cper Fcper R ~ . F'cper A = 1.008inZ Ireqd A t lreqd = 0.672 in 1provd 3.5 • in lreqa < IPrmd pK1 Flexure @ x: ap:= MSX ap = 215.559psi F'b = CD'CL'CF'Cr'Fb F'b = 1507.65psi 6f < F'b OK! Flexure @ cantilever: LZ Mc = (Dt' 2 Mc = Olbft Mc 6f = S 6f = Opsi F'b CD'CL'CF'Cr'Fb F'b = 1507.65psi 6f < Fb OK! Jones Devish Consulting Engineers 303 293 8991 Jim A. Devish P.E. 17) Rafter W Collar Tie.mcd 2of3 Fred & Donna's Residence Jim A. Devish P.E. 3575 Quail Street 17) Rafter W Collar Tie.mcd Wheat Ridge, CO 3of3 #05109 Deflection (approximate): = 0.231 in = 0.154ia Lh Lh 240 360 5•wp•~Lh~4 0 A = 0.009 in 384•E-I d < L OK! 360 Use 2x4 @ 24" o.c. Check 2x4 Doug Fir #1 collar tie: Tension: T = 314.7311b @ Wood plate. Use contircus 12 ga =trap nailed to each stud w (2) 10d n2i!s =_nd ever !zpped at ,he end by 48" Jones Devish Consulting Engineers 303 293 8991 Fred 8 Donna's Residence Jim A. Devish P.E. 3575 Quail Sireet 18) SS w UL.mcd Wheat Ridge, CO 1 Of2 #05109 18) Simple span heatlerwith uniform ioad (1st. filoor): Loading: A P'dl 15'Psf P'II 40'PSf wr a:= 11.25-ft L:= 6.5•ft ~dl P'dl'a ~dl = 168.751bt1 ~ ~ ~ R, R, wll P'II'a o)ll = 4501b8 1 Beam Diagram wt:=WdI+(OII o)i=618JSIbtt~ Check (3) 2x10 Him Fir #1: Attributes: F6:= 950•psi F,:= 15•psi Fcpr:= 405•psi E:= 1500000-psi t:= 4.5-in d:= 925-in CD 1.0 (Occ) CL 1 C,:= 1.0 Cp 1.0 A:= 6d A= 41.525 in2 2 S: t6 S= 64.172in3 3 t• aZ I= 296.795 in4 Shear: wt•L Rmax:= 2 Rmax aY:= 1.5• A F',:= Cp-F, Q, < p', OK! Bearing: F'cper Fcpar Rmax A:=- F'cper A = 4.965 in2 A Rmax = 2010.9381b 6v = 72.466psi F'v = 75psi lreqd t ireqd = 1.103 in lprovd:= 1.5-in Ireqd < IProvd OK! Jones Devish Consulting Engineers 303 293 8991 Fred & Donna's Residence Jim A. Devish P.E. 3575 Quail Street 18) SS w ULmcd Wheat Ridge, CO 2of2 #05109 Fiexure: 2 M= w,8 M= 3267.7731bft Qf:= M S af = 611.066psi pb CD.CL.CF.C,-pb F'y = 950ps1 6f < p'y OK! Deflection: - 0.217 in - 0.163in qg 360 5 •u~t~ • L4 p:= A =0.041in 38d-E•I L OK! A 5 360 Use (3) 2x10 headers Jones Devish Consulting Engineers 303 293 8991 Fred 8 Donna's Residence Jim A. Devish P.E. 3575 Quail Street 19) SS w UL.mcd Wheat Ridge, CO 1 Of2 #05109 19) Simple span header with unlr`orm load (max span 2ntl. floor) Loading: A p'dl 307.5•psf p'p - 615•psf WT a:= l-ft L:= 5.25•ft ~q (Odl P'dl'a mdI 307.5 Ib81 = R, R, (oll:= p'll•a qj = 6151b8 1 Beam Diagrem 51b 8 l co = 922 . t O)t = wdl + wil Check (3) 2x12 Him Fir #1: Attributes: Fb:=950•psi Fv :=75•psi Fcp~r:=405•psi E:=I500000•psi t: =4.5•in d:=1L25•in CD:= 1.15 (Snow) CL= I Cr:= 1.15 Cp = 1.2 a:= t d A= 50.625 in2 2 3 S:= t• 6 S= 94.922 in 3 4 I = 533.936in I rd 2 Shear: wt-L Rmax 2 Rmax = 2421.5631b 6':=1.5• Rmar a A V =71.75psi F'V:= Cp•Fv F'v = 8625 psi 6y < F'v OK! Bearing: F'cper:= Fcper Rmax A - F'cper A = 5.979 inZ lreqd A t Ireqd = 1.329 in iprovd:= 1.5-in Ireqd < lprovd OK! Jones Devish Consulting Engineers 303 293 8991 Fred & Donna's Residence Jim A. Devish P.E. 3575 Quail Street 19) SS w Ul.mcd Wheat Ridge, CO 20f2 #05109 Flexure: LZ M~ 8 M= 3178.301 Ibft M 6 f:= 6p = 401.8psi s F'y:= Cp-CL•Cp-Ci Fb F'b = 1507.65psi Qf < F'b OK! Deflection: 8 - 0.175 in = 0.131 in 4 0 360 5•wlpL4 p -A = 0.013in 384-E-I L OK! ~ ~ 360 Use (3) 2x12 headers Jones Devish Consutting Engineers 303 293 8991 Fred & Donna's Residence 3575 Quail Street Wheat Ridge, CO #05109 Jim A. Devish P.E. 20) SS w UL.mcd 1 of2 20) Simple span header with uniform load (max span 2nd. floor): Loading: A P'dl = 15'Psf P'll:° 30'Fsf W4 a:= il-ft L:= 5.25•ft t (Odl P'dl-a wdI = 1651b8 ~ R, ~ R 1 wp p'p•a wli = 3301btt Beam Diagram = 4951b 8~ wt wdt + 011 wt Check (3) 2x8 Him Fir#1: Attributes: Fb:= 950•psi Fv:= 75-psi Fcper:= 405-psi E:= 1500000•psi t:= 4.5•in d:= 7.25•in Cp 1.0 (OCC) CL 1 Cr= 1.0 Cg = 1.2 A:= t-d A= 32.625 inZ 2 3 S:= t- 6 S= 39.422 in 3 4 t• d2 I= 142.904 in Shear: mt•L Rm~ Rm~ = 12993751b 2 R 1,5. ~ av = 59.741psi F',;= Cp•F, F', = 75psi av< F', OK! Bearing: Foper Fcper RmaY A - F'cper A = 3.208 in2 lreqd A t Ireqd = 0.713 in lprovd 1.5 -in lreqd < lprovd OKI Jones Devish Consulting Engineers 303 293 8991 Fred & Donna's Residence Jim A. Devish P.E. 3575 Quail Street 20) SS w UL.mcd Wheat Ridge, CO 2of2 #05109 Flexure I [v(;= mt• 8 M = 1705.4316ft 6p;= S ap = 519.132psi F6:= Cp•CL•CF'Cr'Fb F'b = 1140psi Q p < g'y OK! Deflection: 8 - 0.175in = 0.131in 4 0 360 5 •wi~ • L4 ~ 384•E-I A - 0.026in L OK! 360 Use (3) 2x8 headers Jones Devish Consulting Enaineers 303 293 8991 Fred 8 Donna's Residence 3575 Quail Street Wheat Ridge,. CO #05109 21) Auially loaded Column with Lateral Load Loading: Vertical: Le:= 14.0-ft b:= 1•ft a:= 1.0•ft hW:= 14•R P'RdI = 17.5•psf p'pd140•psf P'FdI 0•psf p'Fll = OO-psf wwalldl 7-psf Lateral: 85 mph Wind, Exp B Ceµ, .62 CyN, 1.5 qs 25.6•psf IN, t pK,;= Cew•Cqw•qs•Iµ, Pw = 23.8081b$ 2 (nµ,: PWa o)w.=23.808Ib81 Try 2"x6" Douglas Fir-Larch #2 Attributes dX:= 5.5 - indy:= 1.5 - in ~ A= dX•dy A= 8.25 in 2 S:= dy'dX 3 6 S= 7.563 in F6:= 875•psiFc:= 1300•psi Fcp:= 625•psi E:= 1600000•psi Cpc 1.1 Size factor defaults to unity for ail sizes except Dimension Lumber Cgb 1.3 Size factor defaults to unity for ali sizes except Dimension Lumber Load case #1: Gravity Loads Only Pdlt (P'RdI + P'FdI)'b.a + wwalldl'hw a PFll = P'Fll-b•a PRII P'Rll-b•a Pdlt = 115.5 lb Cd .9 Pdlt + PFII = 115.5 lb Cd 1 Pdlt + PFII + PRII = 15 5.5 lb Cd 125 Pdlt = 115.5 Ib PgII = Olb Pgp = 401b Jim A. Devish P.E. 21) Axially loaded column with Lateral load.mcd 1 of3 P R~ dc ~ YEi~l dy L 3 x COLUMN DIAGRAM X Y -~I dx ~ ~J II J A I~ Pdlt _ 12$ 3331b ~Govems) Cd Pdit + PF'll _ 115.5 lb Cd . Pdlt + pFtl + PRIt _ 124.41b Cd Pt = Pdlt + pFlt + PRII Pt = 155.51b Le%:= 20•ft Ley:= O.O-ft (Full length sheathing support) Jones Devish Consulting Engineers 303 293 8991 Fred 8. Donna's Residence Jim A. Devish P.E. 3575 Quail Street 21) Axially loaded column with Lateral Wheat Ridge,. CO load.mcd #05109 ZOf3 K•LeX K•Ley K 1 = 43.636 = 0 dx dy Cd .9 SR is the maximum slenderness ratio LJd SR 43.64 K~g = 3 (for visually graded lumber) c:_ .8 (for sawn lumber) FcE:_ `KcE'E) FcE = 252.041psi SRZ F°c Cd'CFc'Fc F"c = 1287psi FcE ~ 1 + F~c cE _ 0.196 = 0.747 g^c 2-c z -.5 FcE FcE FcE F"~ Fc - F"c CP - CP = 0.187 2c 2-c c Column Capacity p'C;= Cd.Cpc.Cp.pc F'c = 240.942psi Pallow F'c•A Pallow = 1987.7711b pj < palloN, OK! Use 2"x6" Douglas Fir 42 Column Load case #2: Gravity Loads +Lateral Loads Flexure: Cd 1.6 Cr 1.15 CL 1 2 M ~W Le Mµ, = 6999.5521b-in w = g af MW - af = 925.561 psi S F'b:= Cd•CL'CFb'Cr'Fb F'b = 2093psi 6f < F'y OK! F"'c Cd-Cpc-Fc FcE = 0.11 T F"c = 2288psi FcE 1 + F- = 0.694 2•c Jones Devish Consulting Engineers 303 293 8991 Fred 8 Donna's Residence 3575 Quaii SVeet Wheat Ridge,. CO #05109 2 .5 FcE FcE Fcg 1+- I+- - F"cF"c CP - - - CP = 0.108 2•c 2.c c g'C;- Cd.Cpc.Cp.F, F'c = 246.109psi Pailow F'c'A Pallow = 2030.396Ib P[ ` Pallow OK! Combined Stress: PT PT:= 80332-16 fc:= A fc = 97.372psi F'b = 2093psi f0 1Z 1 6f < 1 fc Tb 1 ( FcE ~ FcE J (1 6f f~~Z F ) + f F~ = 0.877 ~ I b im A. Devish P.E. 21) Axially loaded column with Lateral load.mcd 3of3 .42 1 OK! Check bearing stress on top piate:( note! axial stress in stud = bearing sVess in wall pate) Pt 6br: A 6br = 18.848psi pall;= Fcp-A Pall = 51562516 PL 5 Palloµ. OK! Use 2"x6" Douglas Fir #2 Column Jones Oevish Consulting Engineers 303 293 8991 Fred & Donna's Residence Jim A. Devish P.E. 3575 ouail Street 22) Columns.mcd Wheat Ridge, CO 1of1 #05109 22) Columns: 22a) Steel columns: use 4x4x3/16 HSS columns under all steel members w/ Base plate 3/4"x10"x0'-10" w/ (4) 518" dia anchor bolts., Pallow= 51 kips @KLu=10' 22b) Porch Column 10x10 Doug. Fur #2 wood post wl C81010 base plate. OK! by inspection 23) Foundations: 23a) Cont. Footing: Use 12" D x 24"W x Cont footing reinforced w/ 3#5 b:= 24•in psoil:= ISOO-psf Cap b,pso;j Cap = 3000168 1 OK! By inspection 23b) Column Pads: ReacGons and Pad sizes shown on page 24. Reinforce all pads wl # 5@ 12" o.c. each directiori. 24) Basement wall: Reinforce horizontal w/ #4 @ 24" o.c. and # 5 bars @ a:= 2.67•ft b:= 5.33-ft H:= 8•ft pslai:= 55•psf d:= 4-in HZ P:= Psiar 2 P= 17601b MmM:= P. a-b Mmar = 3130.8421bft H ~ 1.7 •Mm~) 2 p AS = 0296 in S~ O•Fy•d Use #5 bars @ 12" o.c. verticai &#4 bars @ 24" o.c. horizontal Fy 60•ksi ~ .9 Jones Devish Consuiting Engineers 303 293 8991 ~ ~ I v9r~-E~u08 C~'a6PIy lea4M 'iaaiic I!end5L5E o eouapisa)~ s,,euuoQJ~ paa-j . ` r I. I r• ~ do F iz 1 ~ ~ ~ i 4b, o ~ „o N cA J _ ~ ~'~f v • . ~ ~ ~ I~ Z ~ ~ ~ ~ N C4 ~ o- qcs - ~ , , v ~ , - ~ # i - - ~ Vi .v' . fj-i \v ( ~ N \ - : ~ - - - I ° ---I-~ - - . ~ a , ~ ?4 I i f N! eV ~ ~ ~ O ~ Jnvi i'/wiY UJJVUVUU tl~ ~gP. isa~i s,Euuoa '8 PaaJ I u~ = 1- ~ 7 Z~ _r ~ n _ -.I I ~ N V J ° ~ , N v~ iI ~ o c h ~ -3 ~ _ ~ ~ N jl~'_'~ F ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ LL IIIIIIIII~II .t~'~ a Z, IIIIIIIII~. li;; i , • L-r'~f. ~ , . . , ~il I i mI I I lei I I I I [i`I I I IE ~ 'i IIII1'Ti. Ii~IIIIiIII .I,IiIIf~, ~ iiiiiiiiiiii 1 iiiii `r'~ f77~7 rt' if Illli I il~llllllll II?fll I'illllllllil~lll;ll~illllllll'!Itlllmllil~' !I IIFhi1111i11i1'!I!il~!ill~il~ ~Illllllf; ; ~`Y . 1~~~~ ~ ; ~ 1~-~`~-~► ;i~ll Illllllli,llllllll IIII II~~; IIII,!I'~II~I I !illil~il IIIII~~II!:~Il~,i'Il,lljl II '!I'II Ill;ilil!II!II!.III!IIIII'!IIIIIII~'`~, - w~a - . ar ~ 141~ a' ~ ~S x I N I ~ 3YVOH M3N 0350dOkid ~ I aouap!saH s,Buuo(j T pel~ i p° ~ a ~ - - - _ _ _ - , C. ?i 1 Q ~ Z J =~M ~ „o O i CI l~y' ~ !+I I I I i F?'_L I1, c0 N J ~ Z . ~ ~ ~ ~~i~llll i I I~ I 1 I 9=1 I! I f' ~II II~III IIiIIi '~I1~5I! I I 't ' I I~ I~I i I I I I I I I I :i . I I I i-~,;~J I ^ zi ~ ` M ~o h~ v OI r~ O ~ ~ F ~ w x $ ~ o2 ~ w N J ~ zt O`') T- ~ ~ rn) ~.__,r,.~. ~ ~ o ~ ?3 u ~ ~z m ~ CL 21 a q N m~~cs 73- ~ ~ a JI~VII/flJl\UJJWVYY ~lb Q aouap. isaa s,Luuoa 'S Ps j I n=~ ~ z~ /-IN N~ 0 r w~ ~ ~ A ~ ~ a _o ~ \ ~~k I I ~ , ~n ,r i _ ri, 1~ ~t' ~ ~ ~`h I N N F~ Q yan - 3 ta _Q oL i CZ ~ M V I 3 i . ~ . ~ ~ , ~ r . ~ . _ ~ . ~ . ~ ~ . , . s , • I ~ o-L ~ I e , ~ • ~ - o . ~ ~ i - ~ - ~ LL 8 ~ a zt m.~wMmo STOP WORK 01D\-T"`%ER YOU ARE HEREBY ORDERED TO STOP WORK LOCATED AT C ! ~ 7 ~-a` ~u•' BY ORDEft OF THE CITY OF WHCAT RIDGE BUILDING DEPAR'TN[ENT FOR 'i'HE H'OLLOWING RCASON(S): ( O~ V) b Vl Cdwt~Ut1'rnA ~ `Phis notice may be removed ONLY by PHE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, BUILDING DEPARTMFN7' ! Date:--l Building inspector 1\~~1 ~~I0~ A ~ ~ ~ ~ Inspection Memo #2 To: Mr. Matt Piper, AIA Piper Zenk Architecture LLC 1242 Jackson Street Denver, CO 80206 From: Jim A. Devish, PE Date: August 8, 2006 Subject: Fred & Donna's Residence Basement floor 2575 Quail Street Wheat Ridge. CO 80206 #05109 Jones Devish Consulting Engineers discussed the results of the phone conversation between the Doug, the Soils Engineer and the City of Wheat Ridge. Based upon his recommendations from this conversation, the basement floor slab is to resist 2 feet of buoyancy due to flooding. The buoyancy force is equal to 124.8 pcf.. In order to resist this force the basement slab is to be thickened to 12" with one layer #4 bars each direction centered in the slab. The weight of said slab is approximately 150 to 150 pcf depending on the density of the concrete mix. This results in a safety factor of 120%. My understanding of my conversation with Doug is that actual buoyancy is only one foot but the city requested two feet of buoyancy. This increases the actual safety factor to 240%. Please contact our office if we can be of further assistance. JONES DEVISH Consulting Engineers, Inc 701 West 48th Avenue Denver, CO 50216 (303) 293 $991 (303) 293 8928 Fax jun@jonesdevish. com Page 1 of 1 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 The City of Wheat FAX 303/235-2857 Apri17, 2006 Fred & Donna Gimeno 1623 Ogden St. Denver, CO 80218 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Gimeno: RE: Case No. WF-06-01 Ridge Please be advised that at its meeting of Mazch 23, 2006, the Boazd of Adjustment APPROVED your request for a Class II Floodplain Exception Permit to allow construction of a single family home on property zoned Residential One and located at approximately 3575 Quail Street for the following reasons: 1. Approval of the request should not have a detrimental effect on the 100-year floodplain as per testimony by the city's director of public works. 2. The requirements of the floodplain ordinance have been met. 3. The floodplain administrator has reviewed and approved the engineer's study. With the following conditions 1. The proposed structure must be consistent with the development standards of Section 26- 806(F). 2. The proposed structure must maintain a lowest floor elevation that is at least one foot above the base flood elevation of 5,410 feet above sea level. The basement, if any portion is below the flood elevation, must be "flood-proofed" to the standazds of the city as stated in Section 26-808 of the city code. 3. Prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, an elevation certificate shall be prepared and certified by the engineer of record and filed with the city. 4. Staff recommended approval of the application. Enclosed is a copy of the Certificate of Resolution, as well as a draft copy of the minutes, stating the Boazd's decision which became effective the date of the meeting, March 23, 2006. Fred & Donna Gimeno Page 2 Apri17, 2006 Please feel free to contact me at (303) 235-2846 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Kathy Fie Administrative Assistant Enclosures: Certificate of Resolution Draft of Minutes cc: Henry Hollander 5777 Old Wadsworth Blvd., #800 Arvada, CO 80002 WF-06-01 (case file) Building File \\srv-ci-eng-001\usersUQ'ield\Kathy\BOA\CORRESP\2006\wf06o 1 approval.wpd COPY CERTIF'ICATE OF RESOLUTION I, Ann Lazzeri, Secretary to the City of Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment, do hereby certify that the following Resolution was duly adopted in the City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, on the 23rd day of March. 2006. CASE NO: WF-06-01 APPLICANT'S NAME: Donna and Fred Gimeno LOCATION: 3575 Quail WI3EREAS, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and WHEREAS, Boazd of Adjustrnent Application Case No. WF-06-01 is an appeal to this Boazd from the decision of an administrative officer; and WMREAS, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law, and in recognition that there WERE NO protests registered against it; and WHEREAS, the relief applied for MAY be granted without detriment to the public welfare and without substantially impairing the intent and puxpose of the regulations goveming the City of Wheat Ridge. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Board of Adjustrnent Application Case No. WF-Q6-01 be, and hereby is, APPROVED. TYPE OF VARIANCE: A Class II Floodplain Exception Permit to allow construction of a single family home on property zoned Residential One. FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. Approval of the request should not have a detrimental effect on the 100-year floodplain as per testimony by the city's director of public works. 2. The,requirements of the floodplain ordinance have been met. 3. The floodplain administrator has reviewed and approved the engineer's study. WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The proposed structure must be consistent with the development standazds of Section 26- 806(F). Board of Adjustment Resolution WF-06-01 Page two (2) 2, The proposed structure must maintain a lowest floor elevation that is at least one foot above the base flood elevation of 5,410 feet above sea level. The basement, if any portion is below the flood elevation, must be "flood proofed" to the standards of the city as stated in Section 26-808 of the city code. 3. Prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, an elevation certificate shall be prepared and certified by the engineer of record and filed with the city. 4. Staff recommended approval of the application. VOTE: YES: ABBOTT, BELL, BLAIR, DRDA, HOVLAND, HOWARD, LINKER NO: None ABSENT: REINHART DISPOSITION: A request for A Class II Floodplain Exception Pemut to allow construction of a single family home on property zoned Residential One was APPROVED. ADOPTED and made effective this 23`d day of March, 2006. 4ofiat l,Chair Adjustment , Ann Lazzeri, Secretazy Board of Adjustment DRAFT construction of a single fanuly home on property zoned Residential One and located at approximately 3430 Simms Street. Planning Staff recommended continuance of this case because insufficient information had been submitted to make an official recommendation for the request. It was moved by Board Member BLAIR and seconded by Board Member DRDA to continue Case No. WF-06-02 indefinitely. The motion passed 7-0. ~ B. Case No. WF-06-01: An application filed by Donna and Fred Gimeno for approval of a Class II Floodplain Excepfion Pernut to allow construction of a single family home on property zoned Residential One and located at approximately 3575 Quail Street. This case was presented by Jeff Hirt. He entered all pertinent documents into the record and advised the Boazd there was jurisdiction to hear the case. He reviewed the staff report and digital presentation. Staff recommended approval of the request for reasons outlined in the staff report. Board Member ABBOTT asked why this request had not been referred to the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District. Tim Paranto explained that the Lena Gulch floodplain has been modified since the 1975 study which was used in the evaluation of this case. Those modifications have altered the elevations. In this case, the applicant hired an engineer to establish the best scenario for the floodway. The city is in the process of entering into a contract with Urban Drainage and F1ood Control District (LTDFCD) to study Lena Gulch inside Wheat Ridge to establish a new Lena Gulch Floodplain study. This study should be completed within a yeaz. He further explained the UDFCD has no authority or regulatory powers with this case. The city can send plans to them for review, but in this case it was not necessary because of staff expertise and a good report from the applicanYs engineer. The applicant's engineer has taken on the liability of establishing the floodplain and floodway elevafions for this property. City staff has also analyzed the case to make sure this property would be protected from any flood damage. In response to a question from Board Member HOWARD, Mr. Pazanto stated that about 90% of the property is designated as in the floodplain under the present study, but he anticipates about 50% of the property would fall outside the floodplain once the new study is completed. Boatd of Adjustrnent _ 2 _ 03-23-06 PRAFT Henry Hollander 6600 Allison Street, Arvada Mr. Hollander, engineer for the applicant, stated that he had nothing to add to the staff's presentation. He stated that the proposed house would have a basement that would be below the floodplain. He asked for clarification that trris basement could be built if it is flood-proofed. In response to questions from the Boazd, Mr. Pazanto stated that as long as the basement is constructed so that no water could enter the house in event of a flood it could be built below the floodplain elevation. Donna Gimeno 1623 Ogden Street, Denver Ms. Gimeno, the applicant, explained how the house would be situated on the lot. There were no other individuals present who wished to address this case. Boazd Member ABBOTT asked for an explanation of "flood-proofing ° Mr. Paranto explained that, for a basement to be allowed, the applicant would have to guazantee that everything would stay dry in case of flood. Openings for emergency access and light would have to be above the floodplain elevation. He also stated that flood-proofing is addressed in the existing code. Upon a motion by Board Member ABBOTT and second by Board Member BLAIR, the following resolution was stated: Whereas, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and Whereas, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WF-06-01 is an appeai to this Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and Whereas, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law, and in recognition that there were no protests registered against it; and Whereas, the relief applied for may be granted without detriment to the public welfare and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge. Now, therefore, be it resolved that Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WF-06-01 be, and hereby is, approved. Type of Variance: A Class II Floodplain Exception Permit to allow construction of a single family home on property zoned Residential One. Board of Adjustment - 3 03-23-06 For the following reasons: R ~~AR 1. Apgroval of the request should not have a detrimental effect on the 100-year floodplain as per testimony by the city's director of public works. 2. The requirements of the floodplain ordinance have been met. 3. The floodplain administrator has reviewed and approved the engineer's study. With the following conditions: 1. The proposed structure must be consistent with the development standards of Section 26-806(F). 2. The groposed structure must maintain a lowest floor elevation that is at least one foot above the base flood elevation of 5,410 feet above sea level. The basement, if any portion is below the flood elevation, must be "flood-proofed" to the standards of the city as stated in Section 26- 808 of the city code. 3. Prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, an elevation certificate shall be prepared and certified by the engineer of record and filed with the city. 4. Staff recommended approval of the application. In response to a question from Boazd Member AOWARD, Jeff Hirt stated that if the floodplain exception were to be granted, the applicant would qual?fy for floodplain insurance. L The motion passed 7-0. C. Case No. WA-06-03: An application filed by the Seniors Resource Center for approval of a 13-foot front yard setback variance from the 30- foot front yard setback requirement and an 11-foot rear yard setback variance from the 20-foot rear yard setback requirement for property zoned Residential One and located at 3227 Chase Street. This case was presented by Jeff Hirt. He entered all pertinent documents into the record and advised the Boazd there was jurisdiction to heaz the case. He reviewed the staff report and digital presentation. Staff recommended approval of the application for reasons outlined in the staff report. Palmer Pekarek 3227 Chase Street Nir. Pekarek is Vice President of Public Affairs for the Seniors Resource Center (SRC). He stated that Jefferson County gave the property at 3227 Chase Street to Board of Adjustment - 4 - 03-23-06 701 West 48th Avenue • Denvcr, CO 80216 • Phone (303) 293-8991 • Fax (303) 293-8928 May 5, 2006 Community Development Department City of Wheat Ridge 7500 West 29th. Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 RE: Addendum No. 1 Proposed New Home for Fred & Donna Starr 3575 Quail Street Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 To Whom it may concern, Please accept this letter as the our official response to the flood plane issues for the above referenced project. Sketches of the flood plane elevation with reference to the basement floor slab elevation are attached for your reference. These drawings illustrate that the design flood plane level is less than 3 feet above the basement floor slab height, and that many feet of soil occur between and above the flood level and the basement walls. Based upon the sketches, the following revisions to the drawing shall occur: 1) The footings shall bear upon 24 inches of compacted structural fill (re: soils report) 2) The basement floor slab shall bear upon 6 inches of compacted structural fill bearing upon 18 inches of compacted gravel (1 inch to 1112 inch in diameter) 3) A French drain shall be installed around the perimeter of the footings (re: soils report) 4) Rubber water stops shal) be installed into all concrete cold joints between the footings, walls and slabs S) A flexible rubber spray on waterproofing membrane or approved equal shall be installed, according to manufacturer's instructions, around the foundation walls to 6 inches above the design flood height 6) Window sills shall be placed 6 inches above the design flood height, eliminating water infiltretion through any of the windows. 7) The sanitary sewer line from the residence shall have check and gate vales as required to prevent back flow into the basement. All penetrations through the basement slab and walls shall be located above the design flood height or shall be sleeved and sealed. Page 1 of 2 The above revisions hereby become part of the construction contract. Hopefully, these solutions address your concerns. Please contact our office, if we can be of further assistance in this situation. espe~t€~1 , ~//Y!/ rewzI.I oh' - Jim A. Devish, P.E. Principal Page 2 of 2 ~ h;►~ ~ 0 ~ a O O J LL. W U z w v~ w E~ m ~ ~ aa t0 C C O 0 ¢ ia I c ~ 2 701 West 48th Avenue • Denver, CO 80216 • Phone (303) 293-8991 • Fax (303) 293-8928 May 5, 2006 Community Development Department City of Wheat Ridge 7500 West 29th. Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 RE: Addendum No. 1 Proposed New Home for Fred & Donna Starr 3575 Quail Street Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 To Whom it may concern, Please accept this letter as the our official response to the flood plane issues for the above referenced project. Sketches of the flood plane elevation with reference to the basement floor slab elevation are attached for your reference. These drawings illustrate that the design flood plane level is less than 3 feet above the basement floor slab height, and that many feet of soil occur between and above the flood level and the basement walls. Based upon the sketches, the following revisions to the drewing shall occur: 1) The footings shall bear upon 24 inches of compacted structural fill (re: soils report) 2) The basement floor slab shall bear upon 6 inches of compacted structural fill bearing upon 18 inches of compacted gravel (1 inch to 1 1/2 inch in diameter) 3) A French drain shall be installed around the perimeter of the footings (re: soils report) 4) Rubber water stops shall be installed into all concrete cold joints between the footings, walls and slabs 5) A flexible rubber spray on waterproofing membrane or approved equal shall be instailed, according to manufacturer's instructions, around the foundation walis to 6 inches above the design flood height 6) Window sills shall be placed 6 inches above the design flood height, eliminating water infiltration through any of the windows. 7) The sanitary sewer line from the residence shail have check and gate vales as required to prevent back flow into the basement. All penetrations through the basement slab and walls shall be loceted above the design flood height or shall be sleeved and sealed. Page 1 of 2 The above revisions hereby become part of the construction contract. Hopefully, these solutions address your concerns. Please contact our office, if we can be of further assistance in this situation. espe Jim A. Devish, P.E. Principal Page 2 of 2 ~ ~ N b~t d i ~ : ~zI ~p ~t 2 M ~IG'~ i~ ~ O$ ~I y! S F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ a O J La.. _ , 2 ~of 2 „ ~ W co !Q ~ N ~ ~ o~ tp C G O 0 ~ , ♦ ~ 22'08! f.:,~ 6 - ~ . . v'. . ' . ~ . ; . uw "A~ENtRR~Y' LLQ , 14. ~ .x~ • y Un ~ '~•F ~ - k'~.~. r ~ ' ~ 1 .sa~ ^.f' ~ . , ' . i . 4:♦ r rt ~ ~ ~ I 5414`~'~~ ~ 4 f~ . T~ 1 TT EA i~30 8,2 ~ F ~ l._ . . `f~~ ~ ✓ ~ A , o 90 L-------'--`. . I Qf23 s 184.4t! , ~ . 4 F •NHE4f `7~' ~ o q,~m l.lty ~f V V ~o~oRpo° Res. New PERMIT NO: 060383 JOB ADDRES5:3575 Quail St DESCRIPTION: Single Family res Ridge SFR PERMIT - 060383 ISSUED: OS/17/2006 EXPIRES: 11/17/2007 CONTACTS owner 303/660-0697 Fred Donna Gimeno PARCEL INFO ZONE CODE: R-1 SUBDIVISION: ua USE: R-3 BLOCK/LOT#: OI FEE SUMMARY Engin. Review Fee Grade/Eill Permit Permit Fee Plan Review Fee Total Valuation Use Tax TOTAL Comments: MR: Approved pursuant to ca CR: OK w/ notes on plans. DFB: A drainage certificati -See attached sheets- I hereby certify thaC the eetback d ..~~s. rulese-6r-regulations cf and tNiat t' assume of 1. Thie permit was issued in accomanc State of Colorado and to the Zunin' ordinances of the City. 2. Thia pecmit eha11 expire if (A) thbuilding authorized is suepended o 3. If this pexmit expires, a new perm chan9ee have been or will be made exceeded one (1) year. If changes be paid for a new permit. 9. No work of any manner shall be dor 5. Contractor shall notify the Buildi written approval on inspection cax fi. The iseuance of a permit or the aF an approval of, any violation of t All plan review is subject to fie: ESTIMATED PROJECT VALUATION: Sb4,oo~.~~ FEES 150.00 23.50 4,605.65 2,993.67 L .00 10,168.00 17,940.82 No WF-06-O1 ject to field inspections. from engineer of record required prior to C/O. ces proposed by thie permit application are accurate, and do not violate applicable City of Wheat Ridge or covenants, eaeements or restrictions oE recocd; that all to abide by all conditions pzinted on this . e; that I have read and agree are accurat ,nsibility for compliance with the Wheat Ridge Building Code (I.B.C) and a11 other iork under this piTyit. P/ ans subject to field inspection. the with the provisions set forth in your applicatCOloradolorsanyeotheor applicablef the xegulations and auilding Codes of wheat ftidge, work authorized is not commenced within sixty (60) days from issue date or (B) the abandoned for a period of 180 days. rovided no . may be acquired for a fee of one-half the amount normally required, p a the original plans and specifications and any suspension earabfulln Y has fees shall iave been or iE suspension or abandonment exceeds one ;1) y that will change the natural flow of water causing a drainage p=oblem. 3 Inspector twenty-four (24) hours in advance for all inspections and sha11 receive before proceeding with successive phases of the job. hal rwal of drawings and specifications sl not be construed l toW b=ule Por regulatioo e provisions of the building codes or any other ordinance, inspections. aace aig ~ INSPECTION REQ : (3 3)234-5933 BUILDING OFFICE: (303)235-2855 NESS gEQUESTS MUST BE MADE BY 3P~ ANY BUSINESS DAY FOR INSPECTION THE FOLLOWING BUSI DAY. # for insp( the As applicant.for terms~ ~c~h.cI rnnna[:#i0n ~ Wtttl ILDING PER11lI1T ?ction #his permit mus# be posted on site and visibie from the street. TERMS AND CONfl1TIONS ag permit in the City of Wheat Ridge, I do hereby agree to the t forth below for the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy in itding permiY. The issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 1) The cortihpletion of ali required landscaping and, related site improvements. inspecti~ns are performed by the Planning and Zoning Division. 2) The co pletion of site drainage/grading requirements per the approved site grading~plan and/or final drainage report and plan, if sucM report and plan is applica le. For all residentiai, and nonresidentiai projects with an approved.fnai draina.ge report and pian, a letter of certificatian is required frQm the civil engineer of record. Inspections are performed by the Public Works Department. 3) The completion and acceptance by the City of Wheat ftidge of all required public improvernents, or a Development Covenant or cash escrow may be required in lieu of construction, as determined by the Public Works Department. The Public Works ~epartment performs public improvements inspections. 4) The co pletion and approval of a Certificate of Occupancy Application form and finaf inlspections. inspecfions are perfiormed by the 8uilding Division. Afl the abovel items mus#. be compieted and approved by Planning and Zoning, guild;ng andIPublic Works before a Certifiicate ofi Occupancy is issued. Final inspection by the Building.Division daes not constitute authorizatian of a Certificafe o# Occupancy nPr permiss+on for occupancy. Occupancy o# the structure is root permit#ed un#il the Gertificate of Occupancy is issued. (Uniform 8uilding Code, Section 909) The City is ndt responsible for any real estate closings or other agreements conceming the propetty hich may be afifected by failure to complete the above items and obtain a Certifcate of~ccupancy. I have read, I ~ understand and agree to the foregoing terms and conditions. .1 have received a copy of th pp i ion for C~eVrfcate ofi Occupancy. Name / . 05/17/06 19:31:18 bp]O1-1s PERMIT INFORMATION: PeYmiL#: 060383 permit Cd: Res. New SFR Pexmit Dt: 05/19/2006 Expirea: 11/13/2006 LANO PAACEL INFORMATIGN: Zone Cd: Reeiden[ial SeA Funcc Use: xesideatial Subdiviaion: tlnassi.gned Cont Type: Onassigned Legal: SoH DESCRIPTION: Single Family xesidence. FEES Engin. Review Fee Grade/Fi11 Permit Pexmit Fee Plan R¢view Fee Total Valuation Use Tax QTY UE 0o 15 . 00 0o 2 50 564,889. 08 4,60 .65 564,809 .08 2,99 .69 564,889 .08 .00 564,889 .08 L0,16 .00 17.94 0.02 CONTACTS: owne[ Fzed S Donna Gimeno 3038600 PERMIT NOTES: 05/17/06 MR: Apprwed p,rsuant to Case 15/10/06 CR: Ok w/ notes on plans. Subj 05/19/06 DFB: OK. A drainage certifica INSPECTION INFORMATION: City of Wheat Ridge Page 1 PERMIT TNFORMATION - 060383 kshutto f+r~m the manufacturer shall be ~ t-,•mertts Aaa~es~: 3s~s oua~~ st . „,-,'t~. for fftnal roof inspectiott which specify Pamel Cd: 39-282-OS-110 a ~ oo.,,,a Gimeno ~ ;-rx rnaierials have been installed to meer o,,,,eR: Fre Address: WH rhree-seca,d wind gust--IBC ii City/St/Zip: 44:w$e 1Vot2; Do: o Owner / contractor is responsible for Ic~atin nasc zone oe: ~c g propertv lines and constructing improvements acec:ding to the : annex Lot: elock No: o ePProved Plan and required develoPment standards . The City is not responsible for inaccurate infomia:ion submitted within the plan set and any conspuction crrors resultlng hom Inaccutate infomiation. P'I° LANDSCAPR R .O mtF*.*a**~ .00 .00 Single end two-family residentiel usa 0 o Sxtion - 26-502 (113,1, a& b) . o o LOne aneet /ree per seventy (70) Ieer (or porlMn .00 Il+sneo,n ofstreelJrontaje to be p/nced ivrthrnlha jronf .00 nlhotkpriorlo (.esuance oja cer[rfrcaJe ojoccupnnc7 16 Nolersrhanrwenly-fiveperoent(15°/.)ejrhegrusf o. 00 /ot oreo pnd no less than one hvndredtxroent (JOOSQ ojlhe jron()nie1 aha/! Le (an& raped GnhetthePlannin D Qartmentfn~n i~--- tnMn and al es of e et- M. WF-06-O1 [o field inspection. i from engineer of record reqvired prior w C/o. -Sehed sheets- r•~LCG Y RFnr.rcn-- Foro S~t1O" z6-SOt ( !e~ n+sx)-o ~r nvo-jom~ rea/lings. !he frsl /we~yy.~Ne P~rr++enf t J~`~° jrom Me exisling ~ nto the rite sha/!be surfared wi~lr evnp~ 4P~~4 brtaE/xmrr or,rlmi/ar rnwena& Cjty of Wheat Ridae PRESCRIPTIVE ENERGY CODE BOILERS 1 FURNACES A MINIMUM OF 90% AFUE Gp5 WATER HEATERS A MINIMUM OF.60 ENERGY FACTOR ELECTRIC WATER HEATERS A MINIMUM OF.93 ENERGY FACTOR SETBACK THERMOSTAT REQUIRED (EXCEPT HYDRONIC HEAT) R.21 WpLL3 • RJE CEILINGS • R-19 CRAWLSPACEE oF WHEqT R ~ u ^ roLOftP ~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTDEPARTMENT BUILDING INSPECTION LINE • 303•234-5933 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE ' 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 - (303-235-2855) PropertyAddress: 357;+S Q0a-i I Contactor Li '✓=?J 1 0~eq ~ OWNEWCONTRACTOR SIGNANRE OF UNDERSTANDING AND AGREEMENT Buildina Dept. Valuation Figure: $ / . ~ I hereby.certifiy that tha setback dwtanees proposed by this pertnit apptiwdon are accu2te, and do notvlolate applicable ordlnances, rules or regulatlons of the Cfty of W heat Ridge or covanants, easemants or restrictfons of record; that all measurements shown, and allegatlons made are accurate; that I have read and agrea to abide by all condfUons printed on this eatlon end ~~~hhhat I assume full responsibitity for compltancewith theWhea~ Idge IldingCoQ.B.C)andallotherappllcableWheat Ridge Ordinances, for viork under Is pertnlt F~ans syla~GLo field Inspecilo,n. ~ (O W N ER)(CONTRACTO R): ~ Value:$; Pemut Fee:$ Plan Review Fee:$ TeTY: Total:$ Use of Space (descriptfon): f ,~1 Description of work: c,,-G ~ ; a ~ ~2 ca~~ : 3~i -a a Sq.Ft.added ~ BUII.DINEPARTMENT USE ONLY 'COMMENTS:~ Approval: e zoning: R ` 3,v~~u/ . IG COMMENiS: Approval: .0 , WORK3COMMEN75: Approyal: ' iPARTMENT COMMENTS: - ApProval: . Roof: Buflding Permit Number. ~ Date: /L, Sq.P ~ itial Units: Electrical Licensa No: Plumbfng License No: Mechanical License No: Company: Company: Company: Expiration Date: Expiration Date: Expiration Date; A~i roval: Approval: Approval: (1) This permttwas Issued inaccordanc8 with the provislons set forth in your applfcatlon and is subjectfo the laws of the State of Coloredo and to the Zoning Regulations and Building Codes of Wheat Ridge, Colorado or any other applicable ordinances of the City. - ~ (p) This permit shall exptre if (A) tha work authorized ts not commenced withln sixty (90) days from Issue date or (B) the building auNorized is suspended or abandoned for a pariod of 180 days. . (3) If this permit expires, a new permit may be acquired for a fee of one-halfthe amount nortnally required, provtded no changes have been orwill5e made In the original plansand specifcations and any suspension or abandonment has not exceeded one (1)year. If chanees have beera or if suspenslon oT abandonment exceeds one (1) year, full fees shail be paid for a new pertnit. (4) No work of any manner shall be done thatwill change the natural flow of water causin9 a dralnaga problem. (5) Contractor shall noBTy the Bullding inspector twanty-four (24) hours In advance for all Inspections and shall receNe written appmval on InspecGon card befire proceeding with successiva phases of theJob. (6) Tha issuance of a parmit or tha approval of drawinqs and specitications shaii not 6e consWed to be a permit for, nor an approval of, anyvlolatlon ofthe provfslons ofthe building codes or anyother ordinance, law, rule orreAulation. All pian review Is subJectto fleld inspectlons. cense No.: ComPany: I/p ~F Ph : ~ZD-elSo - ~SZ/g COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTDEPARTMENT oF W"E'°T q BUILDING INSPECTION LINE - 303-234-5933 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 - (303-235-2855) 7~ !lI SpJF T~e • PL24L2 Property Owner: 5~('eC~4- Property Address: 3-3~6- L`2va. I S't Contractor License No.: ComPanY. Wb Building Permit Number; Date: Phone: 3D=~! -?3(,D - Q( q ~ ~Phot' : `?ZD -z{$o - ")Szl1 OWNEWCONTRACTOR SIGNATURE OF UNDERSTANDING AND AGREEMENT I Buildina Dept Valuation Figure: I hereby certiry that the setback disfances proposed by this permit appiicatlon are accurate, and do not violate applicable ordinances, rules or regulations of the City ot Wheat Ridge or covenants, easements or restrictlons of record; thatall measurements shown, antl allegatfons made are accurate; that I have read and agree to abide by all wnditions printed on this pUon and ~,hat I assume full responsibilfry for compliance with the Wheat I ge Ilding Co e(I.B.C) and aIl otherapplicable Wheat Ridge Ordinances, for work under Is permftI~ans stpitct to field inspectlon. ; . (OW NER)(CONTR4CTOR): e- Pemut Fee:$ Plan Review Fee:$ US TOt31:$ Use of Space (description): Descriptfon of work: \ Sq.Ft.added COMMENTS: Approval: Zonfng: ~ USE COMMENTS: aV i N4 nJo~SO/..f .QQL%/LS Approvai:~ %/Fevr ~ . ~ IORKS COMMENTS: Apprayal: DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: Approval[ Walls:'_/a((,,, Roof: Electrical License No: Company: Plumbing License No: Company: OFe D ~0P4 Residential Units: Mechanical License No: Company: Expiration Date: Expiration Date: Expiration Date; qpproval: Approval: Approval: (1) This permitwas issued inaccordance with the provlsions setforth in your appiication and is subjectto the laws of the State of Coloredo and to the Zoning Regulations and Bullding Codes of Wheat Ridge, Cotoredo or any other applicable ordinances of the Cfty. (2) This permft shall exp(re If (A) the work authorized is not commenced within sixty (90) days from Issue date or (B) the building authorized Is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days. . (3) If this permit exptres, a new permit may be acqulrad for a fee of one-half the amount normally required, pmvfded no changes have been orwill be made In the origin2l plans and specifications and any suspension or abandonment has not exceeded one (1)year. If changes have beera orif suspenslon or abandonment exceeds one (i) year, full fees shall be paid for a new permit. (4) No work of any manner shall be done thatwiil changa the natural flow of water causing a drafnage pro6lem. (5) Contractor shall notliy the Building Inspactor twenty-four (24) hours In advance for all Inspections and shali receive written approval on inspection card beTore proceedlnB wim successive phases of the job. (6) The Issuance of a parmit or the approval of drawings and speciflcations shali not be construed to be a permit for, nor an approvalof,anyvlolatlon f~i provfslonsofthebufldingcodesoranyotherordlnance,law,ruleorregulatlon.Aliplanrevtew Is sub e'$eId i dtfons. Chief Bildina Official COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEhFT4DORF BUILDING INSPECTION LINE - 303-234•5933 C1TY OF WHEAT RIDGE 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 - (303•235•2855) stFALTCA 1 Property Owaer: cr~rPA AcW%_V+V__ 4_'J PropertyAddress: itractor License No.: , CompanY: W 6 Phone:3oe--116O-D(-4_ Pho~n~e: 7ZD-z/80 - RS41 IER/CONTRACTOR StGNATURE OF UNDERSTANDINO AND AGREEMENT I Bu!ldina Deat. Valuatfon Figure: $ reby certlfiy that the setback distances proposed by this pertnlt'appllcatlon are irate,end do not vlolate appllcable ordinances, rules or regulatlons of the Cfty of :at Ridge or covenaMs, eagamanta or reatrictfons of record; thatall measuremeMs Hn, aratl allegatlona mada ere accurete; that I have read end agree to abide by eIl iitlons printed on thia ca8on end at I assuma full responsibility for ipllancewlththeWhea tltl pe IldingCo e(I.B.C)andallotherappllca6leVJheat 3e Ordfnaneas, for work under Is permit ans s to Beld inspec~tl/0J~1 NER)(CONTRACTOR):SIGNEG . DATE/' NER)(CONTRACTOR):PRI D DATE Pezmit Fee:$ Plan Review Fee:$ Us~ TOYaI:$ e of Space (descriptfon): scription of work: Q pt added :ONINGCOMMENTS: Approval: Zoning: 3UILDING COMMENT3: Approvai: BUII.DIlVG DEP 09 'UBLICWORKSCOMMEM3: ~~REnfu/RES /30T~tl~~~'C~~.~~•\ Approyal:p CAqRT/-1~6.,1 . DiI LZ 3~/9~0(~ ~.OF RE~o.eD ~~+iPEa PX164 ro C.O•. :IRE DEPARTMEN7 COMMENTS: Approval: • . Occupancy: Walls:. Roof: Stories: Restdentfal Units: ?0~S , 4nL lectrical License No: Plumbing License No: Mechanical License No: ompany: Company: Company: xpiration Date: Expiration Date: Expiration Date; ,noroval: Approval: • Approvalt (1) Thlspermitwastssuedinaccordancewiththeprovtsionssetforthinyourappliptlonandlssu6JedtothelawsoftheStataof Coloredo and to the 2aning Regulatlons and Building Codes of Wheat Ridge, Coioredo or any otherapplicabla ordtnances of the Ctty. (2) This permit shall expire If (A) the work authorized Is not crommenced within sixty (90) days irom Issue date or (B) the 6u(Iding authorized Is suspended or abandoned tor a period of 180 days. . (3) Ifthlspermttexpires,anewpermltmeybeacquiredforafeeofone-halftheamountnortnaliyrequired,provfdednochanges have been orwill be mede in the origtnal plansend specifications and any suspenslon or abandonment has not exceeded one (t)year. If chanees have bean or if suspension or abandonment ecceetls one (1) year, full fees shall be paid for a new pertnit. (Q) Noworkofanymannershallbedonethatwfllchangethanaturaiflowofwatercausingadrainagepro6lam. M r.nntradr,r shatl nnniv the Buildtna Insoector iwentv-four (24)hoursIn advanex fnr .il Buflding Permit Number: Date: wO~ WH~l'9i DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ° c~ m SINGLE-FAMILY/DUPLEX BUILDING PERMIT APPZ,ICATION REVIEW CDLORP~~ Date: 3117LD~p I,ocation: 3575 Qv.~~-rL ST,fEtT ATTENTION: BUILDING DEPARTMENI' I have reviewed the submitted application documents to construct a S~.vl.cE FA6A4-,G V ZE3idgStICrs to be located at the above referenced address. Please note the sutnmary comrqents below. L Drainage: a. Proposed Grading/Drainage Letter & Plan required: !!!"Yes _ No b. L.ot drainage/grading to be reviewed by Building Division: c. Site drainage/gading plan has been reviewed and is: _[OK _ Not OK; refer ro stipulations. 2. ✓ Public Improvements to be completed: a. street paving/patching: Yes No b. curb & gutter. of DRrvKuT~ Neo~ Yes No c. sidewalk: Yes No If not, the amount of escrow taken: $ w1~ Items escrow is taken for: Has Escrow Agreement been executed: _ Yes Je'No 3. ✓ State Highway Access Permit needed: _ Yes No 4. ✓ Dces all existing roadway/alley R.O.W. meet the standazds of the Ciry: ✓Yes _ No If not, what is requested: NA4' If R.O.W. is required, has the deed been received: _ Yes _ No 5. v-' APPROVED: The Public Works Department has reviewed the submitted material and hereby approves this Permit Application, subject to the above and/or attached stipulations. Signature David F. Brossman, P.L.S. Date 6. 44 NOT APPROVED: T'he Public Works Department has reviewed the submitted material and does not approve this Pernrit Application for the reason(s) stated: Signa7ure David F. Brossman, P.L.S. Date 130,4 .4PPjg0w4z. AE7'v/,zeD ra 7. ✓ Stipulations attached: _ Yes _ No Do.d-a,,w,. 8. -Z A Drainage Certification Letter is required prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy (C.OJ 9. N07'E: Any damage to the existing Public Improvements as a result of this conswction is to be repaired [o meet City standards by the Pertnit Applican[ prior [o the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (303) 235-2861 7500 WEST 29T" AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 FAX (303) 235-2857 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS RESTORATION DATED 3117Lb6 ADDRESS 3-S75 RvftoL 57-;P~ Deaz Contractor: In conjunction with the approval of the building permit application for the above referenced address, this letter is to inform you that all existing public improvements ]ocated along the frontage of said address shall be restored, (if damaged from related construction) to an acceptable condition, as determined by City of Wheat Ridge Public Works Department, and prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Prior to any construction commencing, the City's representative will conduct an onsite inspection to determine the existing condition(s) of the public improvements at this address. If you have any questions, please contact me at 303-235-2864. Sincerely, David F. Brossman, P.L.S. Development Review Engineer Cc: File Rev 4103 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS REVIEW FEE STRUCTURE FOR BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Location of Construction: 3575 QJu.4j1_ Sm,*-&-aeT Purpose of Construction: F~~twriz_V )ea. Building Perxnit Value: Single Family X Commercial Multi-Family DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FEES Development Review Processing Fee: $100.00 $/O D. pp (For document processing) Single Family Residence Review Fee: $50.00 $ 50• DO (For review of applicable technical documents) CommerciaUMulti-Family Review Fee: •(For review of existing technical documents) $100.00 $ •(For review of technical documents for conshuction in RighUOf-Way, Final Drainage Report, anfl Erosion Control Plan) $500.00 $ CDOT Access Permit Fee: $150.00 $ (for document application and processing) Traffic Impact Study Review Fee: $200.00 $ (For document review and processing) . TOTAL REVIEW FEES (due at time ofbuilding permit issuance): $ / So, 00 PLEASE NOTE THAT IN TO TH ABOVE FEES, THERE WILL BE ADDITIONAL LICENSING AND PERMITI'ING FEES RE RED F CONS U TION O OVEMENTS WITHIN PUBLIC ffiGHT-OF-W Y. 7 ~ Signature of Applicanty z qW&I L~ Date KAFORMS & LE7TFStS\DEVELOPMENT FORMSTe< StrucNre (68-04).doc Rev W04 ~ APPLICATION FOR MINOR GRADING/FILL PERMIT APPLICANTS NAME: WNE~T 9 m (c ~~LORM~~ APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: (Include Ciry, Statq Zip) ADDRESS OF FILL: L(5- DATE OF APPLICATION: _ //7 /f//z All pernvts shall be applied for through the Public Works Department. An approved permit is effective for a period of one (1) year from date of issue and may be renewed. All fees shall be in accordance with those fees established by the Uniform Building Code or other applicable City adopted Resolutions or Ordinances. Note: All public improvements, when constructed, shall be mainfained (by the respecrive individual(s) and/or company respansible for the construction af that public and/or private imprnvement in the respective develapment) on a daily basis, or as needed, such that they are free oj mud and other construction debris tracking from !he site. . Failure to comply wiih this requirement will result in the enforcement of Article II, Specified Nuisances, Section I5-I6 (4) af the City of Wheat Ridge Code ofLaws. MINOIt GRAI)ING EXCAVATION AND FILL PERMITS 1. 1-50 Cubic Yards: No permit is required for dumping or excavarion of earth materials, which do not exceed 50 cubic yazds, provided, however, that any fill deposited is on natural terrain of less than thtee (3) horizontal to one (1) vertical slope, or such fill is less than three (3) feet in depth and is not intended to support permanent shuctures, and in addition, such fill or excavarion does not obstruct or otherwise adversely affect any drainageway. Should any of the above standazds be exceeded, or a drainage way be affected, a pemut shall be required under the guidelines for No. 2. 2. 51-500 Cubic Yards: Dumping or excavation of earth materials not exceeding 500 cubic yazds may be allowed with a permit approved by the City Engineer. All applications are to be submitted on the appropriate completed application form and shall be accompanied by the appropriate fee and sketch plan indicating the following infomiation before the permit will be issued. A. Location and dimensions of all properry boundaries and structures on the site. B. Location and extent of azeas to be filled and/or excavated. C. Location of eacisting and proposed drainageways, irrigation ditches, etc., and indication of how and where historic run-offwill be maintained on and through the site. D. Cross-section azea to be filled and/or excavated indicating original slope, new slope and depth of fill. E. Statement that indicates the proposed use or purpose for said fill or excavaflon. F. Relative elevation of adjacent properties. G. Erosion control plan showing placement of conuol devices such as hay bales, etc. 3. 501-10,000 Cubic Yards: Operations in which earth material fill or excavarion exceeds 500 cubic yazds, but does not exceed 10,000 cubic yazds, may be allowed by a permit issued by the City Engineer after review of an application and supporting information. The following information shall be submitted with the required application form: A. A site plan, prepazed and signed by a Colorado registered professional engineer, at a scale of no less than 1 inch to twenty feet (1:20) which illustrates the following: B. Location and dimensions of all property boundaries and structures on the site. C. Location and extent of azeas to be filled and/or excavated. D. Location of existing waterways and drainage courses indicating any changes. (for a site containing an established irrigarion ditch, a letter of approval from the appropriate ditch company shall be required). E. Location of existing and proposed points of ingress. F. Location and extent of existing vegetation, proposed changes in such vegetation and methods of rehabilitation on site vegetation after earthwork operations aze complete. G. Erosion control plan. H. Grading plan with existing (dashed lines) and proposed (solid lines) ground contours with contour intervals of 2 feet and spot elevations. 1. At least two cross secuons (east to west and north to south) through the site showing depth of Fill and/or excavation. J. A drainage report may be required if site runoff chazacteristics aze changed. K. Relative elevations of adjacent properties and structures. L. Statement of purpose of intended fill and/or excavation. 4. Performance Standards: The following provisions shall apply to all Minor Grading, Excavation and Fill Permits: A. Rehabilitation: Within thirty (30) days after cessation of filling and/or excavation, rehabilitation for the site shall have been completed in accordance with the approved plans. Rehabilitation shall consist of leveling, grading, landscaping or any combination thereof to minimize potential erosion and be acceptable to the City Engineer. B. Debris: Debris and/or contaminants shall not be used except with the approval of the City Engineer. "For the purpose of this Section, the term debris sball have the same meaning as the terms "gazbage, trash or junk" as defined in the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, Section 15-4." In no case shall debris or contaminates identified or classified as hazazdous waste by local, state or federal agencies be used as fill in any fill azeas within the City of Wheat Ridge. C. Excavation and/or fi11 azeas shall be graded to facilitate weed control until final grades aze set and site rehabilitation and use occur (must be leveled with side slopes not to exceed 3 to 1). ],ORMS k LE1"fENS\/.PPS k4EAMIt9W1mm Gm~9 RFillPamiLdoc 2 Rev ]/OS CxtyQf VJheat Ridge \ I Departmeeet oF Pubtit Works ME:MORANDUM To: Jeff Hirt, Planner Tech ~ FROM: Tim Paranto, Director of Public Works Cc: DATE: M8Y 25, 2006 SueJECr: Class il Special Exception Permit, 3575 Quail Street I have reviewed the May 5, 2006 submittal prepared by Jim Devish to address the required flood-proofing of the basement of the proposed new home at 3575 Quail Street. It appears that Mr. Devish does not understand the requirements for flood-proofing this property. In summary, the requirements are generally: 1. Flood-proofing must extend a minimum of one foot above the 100 year flood elevation. in this case, the elevation is 5411. 2. The flood-proofing musf assume a direct hydraulic connection to Lena Gulch for an 'sxtended period oftime. , 3. The basement floor and walls must be designed to withstand the buoyant forces (or • uplift) exerted by the water elevation of 5411. 4. A sump and pump is required to be constructed in the basement floorto dispose of any seepage into the basement. The sump must be monolithic with the floor and have no openings other than the top. This sump should be placed near a floor drain to accept any water bypassing the check valve and gate valve installed on the sanitary sewer service line. 5. All penetrations through the floor and walis must be designed to be water-tight. As you are aware, the Special Exception Fermit cannot be issued until the flood-proofing design has been properly addressed. As always, I am available to answer any questions in this matter. 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 303/ 235-2846 Fax: 303/235-2857 The City of Wheat Ridge May 30, 2006 Jim Devish, P.E. Jones-Devish Consulting Engineers 701 W. 480' Avenue Denver, CO 80216 Dear Mr. Devish: This letter is in regards to the Class I Floodplain Exception Permit under review for the property located at 3575 Quail Street. Comments were made in response to the May 5, 2006 submittal by the City's floodplain administratar. The following are the comments from that submittal regarding the flood-proofing of the basement of the single family home. 1. Flood-proofing must extend a minimum of one foot above the 100 year flood elevation. In this case the elevation is 5411. 2. The flood-proofing must assume a direct hydraulic connection to Lena Gulch for an extended period of time. 3. The basement floor and walls must be designed to withstand the buoyant forces (or uplifr) exerted by the water elevation of 5411. 4. A sump pump is required to be constructed in the basement floor to dispose of any seepage into the basement. The sump should be placed near a floor drain to accept any water bypassing the check valve and gate valve installed on the sanitary sewer service line. 5. All penetrations through the floor and walls must be designed to be water-tight. Please resubmit the necessary information to address these comments. This permit and the allowance for consfixction of the proposed single family residence cannot take place until approval is received for the floodplain permit. If you have questions, please feel free to contact me at 303.235.2845. As the review is being done by the City's floodplain administrator, I will direct technical questions to that person. The Ciry's floodplain adminisirator is Tim Paranto, 303.235.2860. Sincerely, J ff irt nner Community Development Department i i ZNRWMddM DN[Q'11[l8 AM121 MUM 10 UIJ AHI ~~q k7N0 panoLUaJ aq letu mloa stq,L ` r 1 J ~ t . 9"li) 4 C~ 7 ..S 7k1 ~ i ~(S)NOSUd DNIMOT10A HS NJ INJWM(MiQ DNla'IItIH HQN IdJHM J0 UIJ JH1, J0 MH0 A ~ > . .i.d agsdDo'l Xorn ao.i.s oi Q21dalWAaMUH Hldd noA N a f(AT X O dois 0 ~ (P , w 4 ~ N a m 0 0 ~ ❑ ❑ Z W O O 0 0 ~ m m a < cDi 0 CD ~ N U m 0 N U c~i 0 ~ ~ 3(D D ~ v 9 ❑ C_ 0 Q D a a ~ N cn N El m 0 ❑ v_ c v ~ 3 •N.• ❑ ~ =r ❑ El W acn ~ O C d ~ ~ m CITy O m p a ~ Y °0 3oo~a 0 n 33 0 o -NO C ` n Z mO ~ ~ ~ 0 w 10 I~TI ~ "'w~ < 0 ~ ~ m Z~a~O Z o CD v, v 0 D':Z.z ~ y ^ : ~ ♦ J f~D O ~ m ~m ~ --I W:5 03 wCD w~ 0 A p 6-1 fW f) W O 7 N S SU N 6 N (D 7 N v CD n ~ ~ N N 0 0 0 0 ~ y C- 0 ~ n CL a N N 0 0 0 O $ ~ C Z ~ ~ "i (D ~ ~ W ~ N m < m ~ N • oo ~ r O Z ~y ~ v ~ L Z 0 y' -I CD 0 0 ~ m ~ -i ~ Z r 0 m N ~ w O , w:E oS wCD w~ 0 A 0 W n IW , 0 7 y S SU N Q (D N 7 N d (D 0 0 ~ V ~ N a ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~I P^ V 2 0 y ~ L. 0 aD a a N N 0 Q 0 ~ C 0 0 Z M9 ~ (D W o 0 m r* Wcn O w (D Lvl rn • ,0 o r O Z (D N v, 3 0 o rn • ` / fll ~ a v ~ m ~ ~ v K t~ w~ O 3 W CD N 7 w0 y A O 1 ~ mm W O W Q J m N CD 0' ~ 7 a) a CD . C) 0 ~ N V (D 0 3 ~ ~ \ •j ~ t ~ ^ ' \ \ , V^. C- 0 Q D C a A N N 0 " 0 S' C ,Jt C~ 'C ~ „ m (D O ~ ~ C) o' v !e tn m G p• W ~ < m oC) rO Z cNn N ~ . ~ 0 ~ , ° Z 0 N ~ M v ' M ~ 1623 Ogden Street Denver, Colorado, 80218 Wheat Ridge Building Inspections 7500 West 29d, Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 September 22, 2006 Re: 3575 Quail Street New Construction Chad, ~ SEP - ~LL 2 5 2006 Pursuant to our phone conversation of September 22, 2006, enclosed are the inspections from Mr. Jim Devish, the structural engineer. These on site inspections detail the footings, foundation walls, and basement slab floor. Should you have questions, please feel free to contact me any time. I will also leave a copy of the inspection notes at the site with the permit. Thank you for your help in this matter. Donna Inspection Memo # 1 To: Mr. Matt Piper, AIA Piper Zenk Architecture LLC 1242 Jackson Street Denver, CO 80206 From: Jim A. Devish, PE Date: August 4, 2006 Subject: Fred & Donna's Residence 3575 Quail Street Wheat Ridge, CO 80206 #05109 Jones Devish Consulting Engineers inspected the footings and column pads, for the above referenced project, on August 3, 2006. The forming required some minor back fill along the sides to confine the concrete in the forms. This was being addressed during the inspection. The reinforcement for the footing and column pads was properly sized, tied and lapped. The contractor was instructed to use #4 bars @ 16" o.c. each direction @ the circular area located in the South east corner of the lower level as the contract documents were not real clear. We also reviewed and discussed the future reinforcement in the basement walls. It was explained to the contractor that the reinforcing for the walls is to be: #4 bars @ 1 6" o.c. in the vertical wall and two #4 bars top & bottom of the wall with #4 bars @ 16" o.c. In the horizontal direction that will need to be added. The contractor was asked how he planned to hold the reinforcement from the ground. The contractor illustrated that he was planning on physically holding it up during the pouring sequence. It was also noted the footing was wider than specified in the contract documents. Since this project was designed as spread footing, this was a conservative modification from the Soils Engineer. Jones Devish Consulting Engineers has no objection to this Modification. The contractor was given permission to pour the footing. Please contact our office, if we can be of further assistance. As our pleasure working with you. rn►.rUc r%UXTTCu J?-Il -I f-J LJ-r Y {0} 1 Consulting Engincers, Inc 701 West 48th Avenue Dcnvcr, CO 80216 (303) 293 8991 (303) 293 8928 Faa jim !l,joncsdevish.coiq dw it is ~ ~ ~ Page 1 of 1 Inspection Memo #2 To: Mr. Matt Piper, AIA Piper Zenk Architecture LLC 1242 Jackson Street Denver, CO 80206 From: Jim A. Devish, PE Date: August 8, 2006 Subject: Fred & Donna's Residence Basement floor 3575 Quail Street Wheat Ridge, CO 80206 #05109 Jones Devish Consulting Engineers discussed the results of the phone conversation between the Doug, the Soils Engineer and the City of Wheat Ridge. Based upon his recommendations from this conversation, the basement floor slab is to resist 2 feet of buoyancy due to flooding. The buoyancy force is equal to 124.8 pcf.. In order to resist this force the basement slab is to be thickened to 12" with one layer #4 bars each direction centered in the slab. The weight of said slab is approximately 150 to 1 SO pcf depending on the density of the concrete mix. This results in a safety factor of 120%. My understanding of my conversation with Doug is that actual buoyancy is only one foot but the city requested two feet of buoyancy. This increases the actual safety factor to 240%. Please contact our office if we can be of further assistance. TQNFC T~EVrcu ConsulUng Engineers,[nc 701 West 48th Avcrme Dcnver, CO 50216 (303) 293 8991 (303) 293 8925 Fax jim@jonesdevish.com { Page 1 of 1 Inspection Memo #3 To: Mr. Matt Piper, AIA #05109 PiPer Zenk Architecture LLC 1242 Jackson Street Denver, CO 80206 Al' ~ From: Jim A. Devish, PE ~a •a Date: August 14, 2006 Subjed: Fred & Donna's Residence 3575 Quail Street Wheat Ridge, CO 80206 Jones Devish Consulting Engineers inspected the stem walls and basement walls, for the above referenced project, on August 14, 2006. The reinforcement in most areas was properly placed. There was an length of stem wall on the North and South elevation where the vertical reinforcement was not long enough. The contrector was instructed to place additional reinforcement of the proper height. This was being completed during the inspection. The other item of concern is the elevation step between the basement and the garage floor. This section, on both the North and South elevations, will now act as a short grede beam. The contractor was instructed to provide (3) #4 top & bottom of the grade beam and to provide the (3) vertical hooked bars equally spaced. The owner was to verify that this has completed satisfactory. The wall forms were not streight and plumb. The contrector informed me that the forms would be straight and plumb prior to pouring. The contractor was given permission to pour. Please contzct our office, if we can be of further assistance. As always, it is our pleasure working with you. ♦ 1 Tn! ~ j GiNt~ i~Evnn Consulting Engineers, Inc 701 West 48th Avenue Demer, CO 80216 (303) 293 8991 (303) 293 8925 Fau jim@jonesdevish.wm I ~ I , O . . C Page 1 of 1 3575 Quail Street Alan White From: Tim Paranto Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 10:24 AM To: Alan White Subject: FW: 3575 Quail Street Alan We should talk. Tim Page 1 of 3 From: Starr-Gimeno, Donna - DPD [mailto:Donna.Starr-Gimeno@ci.denver.co.us] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 4:05 PM To: Tim Paranto Cc: Matt Piper; brossmand@ci.wheatridge.co.us; STELLA STARRELLI; jgerber700@aol.com Subject: 3575 Quail Street Tim, I received the letter written by Jeff Hirt of the Community Development Department written on May 30, 2006. This letter was NOT sent to me, rather it was sent to Jim Devish, P.E of Jones- Devish Consulting Engineers. This letter is much the same as the letter you send from your files on May 25th to Jeff Hirt, of which I have a copy. You sent this copy of the letter to me via email on July 26. On May 19, 2006, I paid $17, 940.84 to the City of Wheat Ridge and received building permits for my new home. Devish-Jones Consulting Engineering addressed these issues, via a letter that was hand-carried to the Community Development Deparrinent on May 5, 2005, prior to the issuance of the permits. Your letter to Jeff Hirt was dated 6 days later on May 25 and the letter sent to Jones-Devish was dated May 30, nearly 2 weeks after the permits were issued. Since the time the permits were issued, I have obtained a loan and construction has started on the site. As with any construction project, loans are accruing interest, construction work schedules are tight and workers who are expecting money for their work. I am willing to work with the city to solve these issues of the flood plain, however, there was an errar made, not on my behalf, of which I was unaware. I am told by the engineer the studies needed for the basement floors and walls to deterxnine buoyant forces will be costly and involve additional time. (Item #3 in the original letter) I am neither able nor willing to stop construction to commission yet another engineering study. The additional time and cost at this point in the construction phase will be fatal to this project. As for the rest of the points in your letter the below explanation covers all the numerated 7/31/2006 3575 Quail Street points: Page 2 of 3 1. Flood proofing will extend a minimum of 1 foot above the 100-year flood plain elevation of 5411 and will be a Tremco Watchdog Seamless Waterproofing Membrane. This product is sprayed on at 60 mils and cures at 40 mils with 500% elongation. Watchdog Waterproofing provides a 10-year transferable warranty to the homeowner. 2. There is an Exterior Drain Tile System consisting of trenching at 1/8" fall minimum per linear foot, with attached polythene to foundation wall and extended into the trench. There will be installed 4" rigid perforated pipe with waterproof fittings, and gravel to fill the sides and top of pipe with a minimum of 6". The cover system will consist of mirafi fabric and discharge is to be to a supplied and installed sump pump pit with pump. The sump pump pit will only have one opening at the floor level. The high point of the drain is to be the bottom of pipe,l2" below the top of the footer. 3. The basement floor will be raised a total of 3 feet above the original plans. This is to accommodate for the 100-year flood plain height. The finished floor will be 5410.1. 4. The sump pump is explained in item 2. 5. All penetrations through the basement slab and walls will either be located above the 100-year flood plain height of 5410 or be sleeved and sealed. All rubber water stops will be installed into all concrete cold joints betcveen the footings, walls and slabs. This should answer your questions about the flood-proofing design. I am expecting the Special Exception Permit to be issued for my new home. Please let me know when I will have the permit. If there are additional questions, please contact me at the numbers below or on cell phone at 720-480-9549. Donna Lieutenant Donna Starr-Gimeno Denver Police Department Public Nuisance Abatement Unit 1311 West 46th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80211 720-913-0543 Cc: Legal file Matt Piper 7/31 /2006 3575 Quail Street Jim Devish General Gerber Construction Page 3 of 3 7/31/2006 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 303.235.2846 Fax:303.235.2857 T7te City of Wheat Ridge August 1, 2006 Fred and Donna Gimeno 1623 Ogden Street Denver, CO 80218 Deaz Mr. and Mrs. Gimeno, This letter is in response to your e-mail to Mr. Tim Pazanto on July 27~h. Please let this letter serve as notice that your permit for a single family residence at this address has been suspended pending approval of the Class II Floodplain Exception Permit. The Boazd of Adjushnent approved the Floodplain Exception at a hearing on March 23, 2006 with conditions, including that the basement, if any portion is below the flood elevation, must be flood- proofed to the standards of the City as stated in Section 26-808 of the city code. You were awaze of this condition by virtue of attending the hearing and ]ater by a letter sent by this department dated Apri17, 2006. As of this date the floodplain administrator has not received an acceptable floodproofing plan and has not issued the Floodplain Exception Permit. Issuance of this permit is required in order for the suspension of your permit to be lifted. No additional work may be performed at this address until the floodplain permit is issued. If you have any questions, please contact me or the floodplain administrator, Tim Pazanto. Sincerely, Alan C. White, AICP Community Development Director cc: Tim Pazanto, Director of Public Works Jerry Dahl, City Attorney j, ciryofWheatRage . Depanment of Public Works MEMORANDUM TO: John Schumacher, Chief Building Official FROM: Dave Brossman, Development Review Engineer DATE: August 24, 2007 SUBJECT: Certificate of Occupancy for Gimeno SFR Public Works received the Certificate of Occupancy request for the above-mentioned residential building located at 3575 Quail Street on August 13, 2007. Please be advised that the as-built information included with the Drainage Certification shows the finish floor elevation to be less than the required 1.0' above base flood elevation as required by the City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Code of Laws. Please be advised of the following: 1. Public Warks can not accept the Drainage Certification for this site. Public Works can not sign off on the Certificate of Occupancy request at this time. Per City Code requirements, the Department of Community can not issue the Certificate of Occupancy until proper repazations have been made, and the Engineer-of-Record has certified the basement floor was completed at an elevation that is a minimum of 1.0 ft above the base flood elevation (whichever vertical datum is used). Subsequent to said reparations, the basement elevation shall be established and a revised Drainage Certification Letter accompanied by the revised As-Built plans shall be produced by the Engineer-of-Record and submitted to Public Works for review and approval. In light of this, I am hereby returning the Certificate of Occupancy request with this memo. CC: Tim Paranto, Director of Public Works Sally Payne, Interim Direc[or Steve Nguyen, Engineering Division Manager Meredi[h Reckert, Senior Planner 7o JohnS - 3575 Quail St - Gimeno SFR CO Request (8-24-07).dw Date: Ll V/ A Certlficate of Occupancy or Completion has been requested for: ,a►ooRESS: 3 5:75 Q uad S:L~ PU2POS[ OI' STRUCTURE: j/--R Building Department Approval: Remarks: /f~ Zoning Approval: Remarks: ~ Public Works Approva Remarks: Fire Marshall Approva (If Applicable) Remarks: Sanitation District Approval: (If Applicable) Remarks: Water District Approval: (If Applicable) Remarks: CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY City of Wheat Ridge 7500 W 29th Ave Wheat Ridge CO 80033 Permit# 060383 Issued: 08/13/07 Stipulations: Single Family Residence This certificate verifies that the building constructed and/ or the use proposed of the building and/or premises, under the above permit number and on property described below, does comply with the Wheat Ridge Building Code and development standards of the zone district in which it is located and may be occupied. All other licensing requirements for the City must be met. Site Address: 3575 Quail St Parcel Number: 39-282-05-110 Owner: Fred & Donna Gimeno Contractor: For the Following Pu Code Editions 2003 ICC/2005 NEC 2003 ICC/2002 NEC 1997 UBC/2002 NEC Sprinkler System ,pose: Res. New SFR NO change shall be made in the USE of this building without prior notice and a new Certificate of Occupancy from the City of Wheat Ridge. Chief Building Inspector Zoning Administrator CERTIFICATE MUST BE POSTED BY FRONT DOOR OF COMMERCIAL OCCUPANCIES City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Department 7500 W. 29th Ave., Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Landscape Improvements Escrow Apreement This agreement made this 24th day of August, 2007 by and between the City of Wheat Ridge and Donna Gimeno (property owner). Escrow in the amount of Three hundred dollars ($300.00) is being held until all landscaping improvements (grass hydro-seeding) are completed at: 3575 Quail Street In the event that landscaping improvements required by Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, Section 26-502 and/or as agreed to by the property owner is not installed by October 31, 2007, the City of Wheat Ridge or its designee shall have the right to enter upon said property to construct and/or install such improvements or do other such work to accomplish that purpose as may be necessary, provided that the City of Wheat Ridge shall first give notice in writing to the property owner of its intent to do so. If the City of Wheat Ridge exercises its right to perform work of any nature, including labor, materials and use of equipment either by force account or contract, the City shall have the absolute right to withdraw the escrow funds to complete said landscape and drainage improvements. The only precondition to the City's right to withdraw the escrow funds for this purpose shall be a letter from the Community Development Director, stating that the landscape and drainage improvements have not been completed or provided and that the compliance date of October 31, 2007 has expired. Approved and Agreed: Propertv Owner Signature Print Name Business Address / Phone Date Citv of Wheat Ridae, Colorado By: Title Date: Considerations when raising basement floor - Possible stair support caisson location change - Extension of plumbing for bathroom and floor drains - Column separation from newly added floor - Stairway reconfiguration and headroom requirements - Possible alteration of joist layout to accommodate stairway reconfiguration - Possible change in glass over tub (tempering) City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Department Building Inspection Division October 12, 2007 Frederick and Donna Gimeno 3575 Quail Street Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Mr. and Mrs. Gimeno, It has come to the attention of the Building Inspection Division that you are constructing a bridge over Lena Gulch on your property at 3575 Quail Street. Application for the required permit for the bridge has not been made, and a permit far the bridge construction can not be approved due to the location of your property in the Lena Gulch 100-year floodplain. It is required that you cease construction of the bridge and remove all construction that has been completed immediately. Additionally, during the course of investigation of this matter, it has been determined that you are occupying the residence on the property without the legally required Certificate of Occupancy. A Certificate of Occupancy can not be issued at this time because the Engineer-of-Record has indicated that the basement floor elevation does not meet the City of Wheat Ridge requirement of one foot above base flood elevation. City documents indicate that you have been made aware of this deficiency, but have failed to properly address it prior to occupying the residence. This letter is to inform you that the Ciry of Wheat Ridge Building Inspection Division can not legally permit occupancy of the residence in its' current state, or construction of the bridge over Lena Gulch. We respectfully request that you contact the Building Inspection Division or Community Development Department immediately to discuss the actions necessary to rectify the illegal conditions which exist on your property. Please also be advised that if contact is not made prior to October 22, 2007, it will become necessary for the City of Wheat Ridge Building Inspection Division to issue a Stop Work order for the bridge, and a Notice and Order declaring the residence a Dangerous Building under the 1997 Uniform Code for Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, and Yo initiate proceedings to remove the bridge and vacate the property. Please contact us immediately so that an acceptable resolution to the situation may be found. Cordially, John C. Schumacher, Jr., CBO Chief Building Official City of Wheat Ridge Building Department 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Office (303) 235-2853 The City of 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80215-6713 (303) 234-5900 Vheat GN 9 Ridge City Admin. Fax # 234-5924 May 2, 2002 Lawrence E. Dezman, P.E. Futura Engineering Inc. 12741 E. Caley Ave., Suite 126 Englewood, Colorado 80111 Police Dept. Fax # 235-2949 Re: Howard Noble Property Hydraulic Analysis f'~'I'~10 Dear Larry, ~ m va I have received your submittal of the hydraulic analysis for the Howard Noble property at the southwest end of Quail Street, south of 38`h Avenue near Lena Gulch. This analysis is a requirement of the Wheat Ridge Flood Plain Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 26, Article VIII, of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws. Because this is in conjunction with a request to allow for the constnxction of a single family home by another party in the future, it requires the issuance of a Class II Special Exception to the Flood Plain. Enclosed is a copy of an application for the required permit. This application is required to be presented to the Board of Adjustment for approval. As the Flood Plain Administrator for the city, I am required to review the documentation and make a recommendation to this Board. To continue my review, I have several points which need to be addressed or clarified: ❑ Please verify that all of the referenced elevations aze plus 5,400 feet above sea level, and the datum which you used. This documentation will also be required upon completion of the structure when, as the engineer of record, you will provide to the city an elevation certificate for the finished floor completed by a Professional Land Surveyor. 0 Please provide a cross section in the Lena Gulch low flow channel directly south o£your cross section E-E. I am concerned about the 635 cfs meeting the 2380 cfs in the bypass channel below the drop shucture and the elevation of the flow at this confluence point. ❑ The proposed swale requires 15' of width. The existing ground may not allow this width to occur without fill or excavation to create a straight 2% grade from the high point at the NW corner of the lot to the release points of the swales. Please provide a site grading plan which shows the proposed swales, the existing contours and the proposed contours and final grades of the lot. ❑ Please provide an erosion control plan for the period of conshuction and site grading, as well as permanent control of the release points of the swales. ❑ The north swale discharges to the east without a defined flow path back to Lena Gulch. Q, RECVCLED PAPER ~QCoQ, c,~',•G'' F WHEqT O ~ The City of Wheat Ridge c~ m Flood Plain Development Permit LoR Po° Application Information Permit LA55 'ir Date Owner Telephone Address Contractor Telephone Address Project Location/Directions Project Description Single Family Residential _New Construction _Channelizatiori Multi-Family Residential _Substantial _Fill - Improvement (>50%) Manufactured (Mobile) Home _Improvement (<50%) _Bridge/Culvert Non-residential _Rehabilitation _Levee Other/Explanations Class of Permit/Fee Schedule Class I(structures for non-human occupancy) $150 AClass II (structures for human occupancy) $340 (includes public noticing fees) I have read and understand and will comply with the requirements of this Flood Plain Pernut. Applicant Signature Date (To be completed by Flood Plain Administrator) Flood Hazard Data Watercourse Name LEIJ~ 6~1A LGF~ - The project is proposed in the Floodway Floodway Fnnge X Base (100-yeaz) flood elevation(s) at pxoject site NGVD Elevation required for Lowest Floor NGVD / Floodproofing Source Documents: Reports/Maps Xs XsR~~s 1;?, 2n tX '779. X r/ \ XSR2jp ~/r_-. XSR?OR XsR~DB 6a50cfs @zr ~ s XsR c~ XSR2 X~nR? R j7 lob j ' XSR?~y X,t / 27 'S 15~ 7 Xs R?7 1. 'o R Xss 27 9 ,b --XsR XS R IL~- XSR 54oc /0 s XsR7a I Xsx7 Ris F XSRfBR X ! XS xA@ S i 4;( •v .R J. SR o X SR7J RT B XsRf 45 Xs7 7j XSR7 , XSR79 XSR7J @1S.D XsR 17.1 ,~6W s s R s=r.7~ f T ~ 32c ~ c~ rz~5 a • XSRi H~# T s ° ~ 77]]~~~~YS y XS~ XSR.70 ® i 7 XSR7 XSRT y .7 f 4e S X R7~S.~ XSR XSRTS / x fft ,7 X&RTS / /~~`1 try Xs - X's X& 72 R 3 X987 X R '/X/~R7'X z'~ ~1`\1\ ~ X '~iC~ ~,fXX CE '~~/v •T ! ~ / qD off`, / XSR7 ! \ E ` b~' \X 4~~~, / X`SR7 1 I ~/6 /~82~~ ♦ 'jo 73'x ` I ~ ~ X yT SR7s 0 YJ X& R7Sr X . a s XsR? ) /ac?.. XSRo qR XsRTB ~ ~ 2n S • % RTO 2~D . I~EU Q'` XsR J7 9 X R7?s / j ! _ r la. 2r.!> 1 ! , r z- ARTICLE VIIL FLOODPLAIN CONTROL Page ] of 16 ARTICLE VIII. FLOODPLAIN CONTROL Sec. 26-801. Authorization; findings, objectives. A. Statutory authorization. The Legislature of the State of Colorado has in C.R.S. § 31-23-301, delegated the responsibility to local governmental units to adopt regulations designed to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of its citizenry. Therefore, the city council of Wheat Ridge, Colorado, acting pursuant to its powers and authorities granted and reserved under Article XX of the Constitution of the State of Colorado and the Home Rule Charter adopted thereunder, does hereby ordain following as its floodplain zoning provisions. B. Findings of fact. The City of Wheat Ridge hereby finds that: 1. The flood hazard areas of Wheat Ridge are subject to periodic inundation which results in loss of life and property, health and safety hazards, disruption of commerce and governmental services, extraordinary public expenditures for flood protection and relief, and impairment of the tax base, all of which adversely affect the public health, safety and general welfare. 2. These flood losses are caused by the cumulative effect of obstructions in areas of special flood hazards which increase flood heights and/or velocities and when inadequately anchored damage uses in other areas. Flood losses are also caused by uses that are inadequately floodproofed, inadequately elevated or otherwise protected from flood damage. C. Public objectives to be achieved. The city council hereby finds it in the public interest, and in the furtherance of the public health, safety and welfare, that the following objectives be fulfilled: 1. To promote the public health, safety and general welfare, to minimize flood losses in areas subject to flood hazards, and to promote wise use of the "Flood Regulatory DistricY" by: a. Prohibiting certain uses which are dangerous to life or property in time of flood. b. Restricting uses which would be hazardous to the public health in time of flood. c. Restricting uses which are so particularly susceptible to flood damage, so as to alleviate hardship and reduce demands for public expenditures for relief and protection. d. Restricting permitted Flood Regulatory District uses, including public facilities which serve such uses, to be protected against floods by providing floodproofing and general flood protection at the time of initial construction. 2. To protect occupants of the Flood Regulatory District from a flood which is or may be caused by their own, or other, land use and which is or may be undertaken without full realization of the danger through: a. Regulating the manner in which structures designed for human occupancy may be constructed so as to prevent danger to human life within such structures. b. Regulating the method of construction of water supply and sanitation systems so as to prevent disease, contamination and unsanitary conditions. http://library4.municode.com/mcc/DocView/1 1 707/ 1 / 143/1 52?hilite=floodplain;floodplai... 10/17/2007 ARTICLE VIII. FLOODPLAIN CONTROL Page 2 of 16 c. Delineating and describing areas that could be inundated by floods so as to protect individuals from purchasing lands for purposes which are not in fact suitable. d. Ensuring that potential buyers are notified that property is in an area of special flood hazard. e. Ensuring that those who occupy the areas of special flood hazards assume responsibility for their actions. 3. To protect the public from the burden of extraordinary financial expenditures for flood control and relief. a. Regulating all uses within the Flood Regulatory District so as to produce a method of construction and a pattern of development which will minimize the probability of damage to property and loss of life or injury to the inhabitants of the flood hazard areas. b. Minimizing the need for rescue and relief efforts associated with flooding which are generally undertaken at the expense of the general public. c. Minimizing prolonged business interruptions. d. Minimizing damage to public facilities and utilities, such as water and gas mains; electric, telephone and sewer lines; streets and bridges located in areas of special flood hazard. e. Helping maintain a stable tax base by providing for sound use and development of areas of special flood hazard so as to minimize future flood-blight areas. f. Participating in the National Flood Insurance Program to assist property owners in obtaining adequate insurance coverage. 4. To protect the hydraulic characteristics and storage capacity of the Flood Regulatory District and small watercourses, including the gulches, sloughs and artificial water channels, used for conveying floodwaters so as to promote retention of sufficient floodway area to convey flood flows which can reasonably be expected to occur by: a. Regulating filling, dumping, dredging and alteration of channels by deepening, widening or relocating, so as to maintain natural storage capacity and slow flow characteristics. b. Prohibiting unnecessary encroachments. c. Encouraging uses such as agriculture, open space, recreation, greenbelt, riding trails and parking. d. Preventing or regulating the construction of flood barriers which will unnaturally divert floodwaters or which may increase flood hazards in other areas. e. Restricting or prohibiting uses which are dangerous to health, safety and property due to water or erosion hazards or which result in damaging increases in erosion or in flood heights or velocities. f. Requiring that uses vulnerable to floods, including facilities which serve such uses, be protected against flood damage at the time of initial construction. (Ord. No. 2001-1215, § 1, 2-26-01) http://Iibrary4.municode.com/mcc/DocView/I 1707/1/143/ 152?hilite=floodplain;floodplai... 10/ 17/2007 ARTICLE VIII. FLOODPLAIN CONTROL Sec. 26-802. Definitions. Page 3 of 16 Unless specifically defined below, words or phrases used in these regulations shall be interpreted so as to give them the meaning they have in common usage, so as to be consistent with the definition given the term in other portions of this zoning code, and to give these regulations their most reasonable application. Appeal. A request for a review by the board of adjustment of any interpretation made by the floodplain administrator (or his representative) of any provision of these regulations or a request for a special exemption permit from said provisions. Area of shallow flooding. A designated AO or VO zone on the current flood insurance rate map (FIRM). The base flood depths range from one (1) to three (3) feet; a clearly defined channel does not exist; the path of flooding is unpredictable and indeterminate; and flow may or may not be evident. Area of special flood hazard. The land in the floodplain within a community subject to a one (1) percent or greater chance of flooding in any given year. Base flood. The flood having a one (1) percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. Channel. That area of a watercourse where water normally flows. Crawl space. An unfinished, enclosed area beneath a habitable floor or a building that is uninhabitable because of its shallow height of four (4) feet or less, but can be utilized for storage. Development. Any manmade change to improved or unimproved real estate, including, but not limited to, buildings or other structures, mining, dredging, filling, grading, paving, excavation or drilling operations located within the Flood Regulatory District. Equal degree of encroachment. Established by considering the effect of encroachments on the hydraulic efficiency of the floodplain along a significant reach of the stream on both sides. Flood or flooding. A general and temporary condition of partial or complete inundation of normally dry land areas from the unusual and rapid accumulation of runoff or surface waters from any source. Flood insurance rate map (FIRM). The official map on which the Federal Emergency Management Agency has delineated both the areas of special flood hazards and the risk premium zones applicable to the community. Flood insurance study. The official report provided by the Federal Emergency Management Agency that includes flood profiles, the flood boundary-floodway map, and the water surface elevation of the base flood. Floodplain. See "Flood Regulatory District." Floodplain administrator. The city engineer or his designee is assigned the responsibility to coordinate and deal with all aspects of these regulations. Flood profile. A graph or longitudinal profile showing the relationship of the water surface elevation of a flood event to existing ground surface along a stream or river. Floodproofing. A combination of structural provisions, changes or adjustments to properties and structures subject to flooding primarily for the reduction or elimination of flood damages to properties, water and sanitary facilities, structures and contents of buildings. Flood protection elevation. An elevation one (1) foot above the elevation or flood profile of the 100-year flood under existing channel and floodplain conditions. It is one (1) foot above the elevation of the flood for the flood regulatory district as shown on the official map and engineering reports of the City of Wheat Ridge. Flood regulatory district. The area adjacent to a watercourse which is subject to flooding as the http://library4.municode.com/mcc/DocView/11707/1 / 143/ 152?hilite=floodplain;floodplai... 10/ 17/2007 .b,RTICLE V[II. FLOODPLAIN CONTROL Page 4 of 16 result of the occurrence of the 100-year flood. Thus, the area is so adverse to past, current or foreseeable construction or land use as to constitute a significant hazard to public health and safety or to property. The term includes, but is not limited to, mainstream floodplains; debris-fan floodplains; and dry wash channels and dry wash floodplains. The flood regulatory district is composed of the Floodway District and the Flood Storage District. Flood storage district. The fringe portion of the Flood Regulatory District in which flows are characteristically backwater and areas of shallow flooding. Floodway district. The portion of the Flood Regulatory District required for the reasonable passage or conveyance of the 100-year flood which is characterized by hazardous and significant depths and velocities. Lowest floor. The lowest enclosed area of a building including basement. However, a crawl space usable solely for storage is not considered a building's lowest floor; provided, that the crawl space is built in conformance with section 26-806F. Manufactured home. A structure that is transportable in one (1) or more sections, built on a permanent chassis, and designed to be used with or without a permanent foundation when connected to the required utilities. This term also includes park trailers, travel trailers and other similar vehicles placed on a site for greater than one hundred eighty (180) consecutive days. Note: This definition applies only to Flood Regulatory District Regulations. Manufactured home park or subdivision. A parcel or contiguous parcels of land divided into two (2) or more manufactured home lots for rent or sale. Mean sea level. For purposes of the National Flood Insurance Program, the National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) of 1929 or other datum to which base flood elevations shown on the community's flood insurance rate map are referenced. New construction. Structures for which the start of construction commences on or after the effective date of these regulations. New manufactured home park or manufactured home subdivision. A parcel or contiguous parcels of land divided into two (2) or more manufactured home lots for rent or sale for which the construction of facilities for servicing the lot (including, at a minimum, the installation of utilities, final site grading, the construction of concrete pads, or the construction of streets) is completed on or after the effective date of these regulations. 100-year flood. One (1) that has a statistical frequency of occurring once in one hundred (100) years. This is determined from an analysis of floods on a particular watercourse and other watercourses in the same general region. It has about a one (1) percent chance of occurring in any given year. Reach. A hydraulic engineering term to describe longitudinal segments of a stream or river. A reach will generally include the segment of the floodplain where flood heights are primarily controlled by manmade or natural floodplain obstructions or restrictions. In an urban area, the segment of a stream or river between two (2) consecutive bridge crossings may be a reach. Significant reach. A reach extending to the point upstream, downstream and both sides of the channel where no change in elevation of the 100-year floodwater surface elevation occurs, as caused by permitted uses in the Flood Regulatory District. Special exemption permit. A grant of relief from the requirements of these regulations which permits construction in a manner that would otherwise be prohibited by these regulations. This term is synonymous with a variance. Start of construction. The date the building permit was issued for any improvement; provided, that the actual start of construction, repair, reconstruction, placement or other improvement was within one hundred and eighty (180) days of the permit date. The actual start means the first placement of permanent construction of a structure on a site, such as the pouring of slab or footings, the installation http://library4.municode.com/mcc/DocView/1 1 707/1/143/1 52?hilite--floodplain;floodplai... 10/17/2007 ARTICLE VllL FLOODPLAIN CONTROL Page 5 of 16 of piles, the construction of columns, or any work beyond the stage of excavation, or the placement of a manufactured home on afoundation. Permanent construction does not include land preparation, such as clearing, grading and filling; nor does it include the installation on the property of accessory buildings, such as garages or sheds not occupied as dwelling units or not part of the main structure. Storage capacity of a floodplain. The volume of space between a given flood stage and existing ground surface occupied by floodwater of a given stage at a given time, regardless of whether or not the water is moving. Structure. Anything constructed or erected, the use of which requires a more or less permanent location on or in the ground. Includes, but is not limited to, objects such as buildings, factories, sheds, cabins, manufactured housing and fences. This term does not include signs, utility or light poles. Structure, permanent. A structure which is built of such materials and in such a way that it would commonly be expected to last and remain useful for a substantial period of time. Structure, temporary. A structure which is built of such materials and in such a way that it would commonly be expected to have a relatively short useful life or is built for a purpose that would commonly be expected to be relatively short-term. Substantial improvement. Any addition, repair, reconstruction or improvement of a structure, the cost of which equals or exceeds fifty (50) percent of the fair market value of the structure either before the improvement or repair is started or, if the structure has been damaged and is being restored, before the damage occurred. For the purposes of this definition, "substantial improvemenY" is considered to occur when the first alteration of any wall, ceiling, floor or other structural part of the building commences, whether or notthe alteration affects the external dimensions of the structure. The term does not, however, include either: (a) Any project for improvement of a structure to comply with existing state or local health, sanitary or safety code specifications which are solely necessary to assume safe living conditions; or (b) Any alteration of a structure listed on the National Register of Historic Places or a state inventory of historic places at the effective date of these regulations. Violation. The failure of a structure or other development to be fully compliant with the community's Flood Regulatory District regulations. Water surface elevation. The height above mean sea level according to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) of 1929 (or other datum, where specified) of floods of various magnitudes and frequencies in the Flood Regulatory District. (Ord. No. 2001-1215, § 1, 2-26-01) Sec. 26-803. General provisions. A. Jurisdiction. The provisions of this article shall apply to all lands within the Flood Regulatory District as defined on the official maps and engineering reports of the City of Wheat Ridge. B. District types. The Flood Regulatory District covers the area inundated by the 100-year flood. The Flood Regulatory District has been divided into two (2) subdistricts: The Floodway District and the Flood Storage District. The Flood Regulatory District, the Floodway District, and the Flood Storage District are not separate zoning districts, but are overlay districts over existing zoning districts. In addition to meeting the conditions of the underlying zoning district, any property to be developed in the Flood Regulatory District must meet the conditions of the applicable overlay flood district. C. District determination. All properties within the boundaries of the 100-year flood as shown http://library4.municode.com/mcc/DocView/I 1 707/1 /143/ 1 52?hilite=floodplain;floodplai... 10/17/2007 ARTICLE VIII. FLOODPLAIN CONTROL Page 6 of 16 on the current flood insurance rate map for the City of Wheat Ridge, shall be in either the Floodway or Flood Storage District and shall be subject to the requirements of sections 26-805 Floodway District, or 26-806 Flood Storage District, respectively. D. Boundaries. The boundaries of the Flood Regulatory District, Floodway District and Flood Storage District have been defined by computing the 100-year flood limits under existing channel and floodplain conditions as shown on the official maps and engineering reports. The boundaries of the Flood Regulatory District, Floodway District and the Flood Storage District shall be as they appear on the official maps and engineering reports kept on file in the office of the city engineer. The boundary lines on the map shall be determined by the use of the scale and other surface features appearing on the map. When there is a conflict between the boundary lines illustrated on the map and the actual field conditions, the dispute shall be settled according to section 26-808. E. Interpretation. In the interpretation and application of these floodplain regulations, these provisions shall be held to be minimum requirements, shall be liberally construed in favor of the governing body, and shall not be deemed a limitation or repeal of any other powers granted by Colorado Statutes or the Charter or ordinances of the City of Wheat Ridge. F. Warning and disclaimer of liability. The degree of flood protection intended to be provided by these floodplain regulations is considered reasonable for regulatory purposes and is based on nationally recognized and/or published engineering and scientific methods of study. Larger floods may occur on occasions or the flood height may be increased by manmade or natural causes, such as ice jams and bridge openings restricted by debris. These regulations do not imply that areas outside Flood Regulatory District boundaries or land uses permitted within such districts will always be totally free from flooding or flood damage. Anyone constructing new structures within the Flood Regulatory District is accepting complete responsibility for non- regulated events. These regulations shall not create a liability on the part of or a cause of action against the City of Wheat Ridge or any offcer or employee thereof for any flood damages that may result from reliance on these regulations. G. Official maps and engineering reports. The location and boundaries of the Flood Regulatory District shall be as identified by the Federal Emergency Management Agency in "The Flood Insurance Study for Jefferson County, Colorado", dated June 17, 2003, and any amendments or revisions thereto are hereby adopted by reference and declared to be a part of this article. The location and boundaries of the Floodway and Flood Storage Districts shall be as shown in the following engineering reports and accompanying maps: 1. Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) panels dated June 17, 2003 for portions of the City of Wheat Ridge. 2. Clear Creek: Flood hazard area delineation, report, prepared by Gingery Associates for Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, November, 1979. 3. Major drainageway planning for Lower Clear Creek: Phase B, prepared by Wright- McLaughlin Engineers for Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, October 1981. 4. Lena Gulch: Lena Gulch Master Drainage Plan, prepared by Wright-McLaughlin Engineers for Urban and Flood Control District, June 1975. The flood insurance rate map and the above-mentioned engineering reports constitute the current flood insurance study for the City of Wheat Ridge and are hereby adopted by the above reference and declared to be part of these regulations. The flood insurance rate map and the above-mentioned engineering reports, which constitute the flood insurance study are on file at the Wheat Ridge Municipal Building, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. (Ord. No. 2001-1215, § 1, 2-26-01; Ord. No. 1293, § 1, 6-9-03) http://library4.municode.com/mcc/DocView/1 1 707/1 / 1 43/ 1 52?hilite=floodplain;floodplai... 10/17/2007 ARTICLE VIII. FLOODPLAIN CONTROL Page 7 of 16 Sec. 26-804. Flood Regulatory District. A. Application and description. 1. The Flood Regulatory District includes all lands that are inundated by the 100-year flood as shown on the official maps and engineering reports for the City of Wheat Ridge. GRAPHIG LINK:FIood Re~ulatory District 2. Based upon the official maps and engineering reports for the City of Wheat Ridge, the Flood Regulatory District has been separated into two (2) subdistricts: the Floodway District and the Flood Storage District (see Figure 26-804.1 above). 3. The respective regulations of section 26-805 and section 26-806 shall regulate all lands within the Flood Regulatory District. (Ord. No. 2001-1215, § 1, 2-26-01) Sec. 26-805. Floodway District. A. Application and description. These regulations shall apply to all properties designated as within the Floodway District. B. Permitted uses. The following open uses shall be permitted within the Floodway District to the extent that they are not prohibited in a particular area by any underlying zoning ordinance and do not include any structures, filling or deposit of materials, and do not cause any increase in the base flood elevation of the Floodway District. 1. Agricultural uses such as general farming, pasture, truck farming, forestry, sod farming and wild crop harvesting; 2. Public and private recreational uses not requiring permanent or temporary structures such as parks, swimming areas, golf courses, driving ranges, picnic grounds, wildlife and nature preserves, game farms, fish hatcheries, shooting preserves, target ranges and hunting, fishing and hiking areas; 3. Utility facilities such as flowage areas, transmission lines, pipelines, water monitoring devices, roadways and bridges; 4. Uses very similar in nature to these permitted uses may be allowed, provided that they are consistent with the provisions of these regulations. C. Prohibited uses. 1. Structures, fill or deposition of materials shall be prohibited in the Floodway District. 2. The storage or processing of materials that are buoyant, flammable or explosive, or any hazardous liquid or soluble matter which in times of flooding could be injurious to human, animal or plant life shall be prohibited within the Floodway District. (Ord. No. 2001-1215, § 1, 2-26-01) Sec. 26-806. Flood Storage District. A. Application and description. These regulations shall apply to all properties designated as within the Flood Storage District. http://library4.municode.com/mcc/DocView/11707/1 /143/152?hilite=floodplain;floodplai... 10/17/2007 ARTICLE VIIL FLOODPLAIN CONTROL Page 8 of 16 B. Permitted uses. The permitted uses in the flood storage district are the same as those uses permitted in section 26-805B. However, in the Flood Storage District, special exemption permits may be applied for as specified in paragraphs C. and D. C. Special exceptions--Class I. Any use enumerated in this paragraph may be permitted only upon the issuance of a Class I special exception permit by the floodplain administrator as provided in section 26-808C. and in compliance with subsection F., of this section. 1. Structures for non-human occupancy. Fences, sheds, signs and accessory buildings may be permitted only upon a finding that the structures do not create a negative impact on the base flood elevation or flow velocity. 2. Structures for human occupancy. Improvements to existing structures may be permitted only upon a finding that the improvements proposed are not substantial improvements, as defined in section 26-802. 3. Fill or deposition of material. Filis or deposition of materials may be permitted only upon a finding that the proposed plan will comply with subsection F., of this section. D. Special exceptions--Class ll. Any use enumerated in this paragraph may be permitted only upon the issuance of a Class II special exception permit by the board of adjustment as provided in section 26-808 and in compliance with subsection F., of this section. 1. Structures for human occupancy. New construction or substantial improvement of any residential, commercial, industrial or other nonresidential structure may be permitted only uoon a certification bv a re8istered professional en ineer to the floodplain more flood one (1) foot or 2. Manufactured homes. New manufactured home parks and manufactured home subdivisions, expansions of existing manufactured home parks and manufactured home subdivisions, and existing manufactured home parks and manufactured home subdivisions where the repair, reconstruction or improvement of the street utilities exceeds fifty (50) percent of the fair market value of the streets, utilities and pads before the repair, reconstruction or improvement has commenced, and for manufactured homes not placed in a manufactured home park ormanufactured home subdivision, may be permitted only upon a certification by a registered professional engineer to the floodplain administrator that: a. All manufactured homes or those to be substantially improved shall be elevated on a permanent foundation such that the lowest floor of the manufactured home is elevated one (1) foot or more above the base flood system. Manufactured homes shall be anchored in accordance with subsection F.12., of this section. b. Adequate surface drainage and access for a hauler will be provided. E. Prohibited uses hazardous materials. The storage or processing of materials that are buoyant, flammable or explosive, or any hazardous liquid or soluble matter which in times of flooding could be injurious to human, animal or plant life shall be prohibited within the Flood Storage District. F. Development standards. The following regulations shall apply to all permitted development and uses within the Flood Storage District: 1. All new structures which are walled and roofed and greater than one hundred twenty (120) square feet in size must be elevated one (1) foot above the base flood elevation. 2. All development shall be evaluated based on any analysis of an equal degree of http://Iibrary4.municode.com/mcc/DocView/I 1 707/1 /143/1 52?hilite=floodplain;floodplai... 10/17/2007 ARTICLE VIII. FLOODPLAIN CONTROL Page 9 of 16 encroachment based on conveyance of the 100-year flood extending for a significant reach on both sides. 3. No Flood Storage District uses shall adversely affect the effciency of or unduly restrict the capacity of the channels or floodways of any tributaries to the main stream, drainage ditches, or any other drainage facilities or systems. 4. All new construction and substantial improvements shall be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral movement of the structure and to withstand hydrodynamic loads. 5. All new construction and substantial improvements shall be constructed with materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage. 6. All new construction and substantial improvements shall be constructed by methods and practices that minimize flood damage. 7. Electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing, and air conditioning equipment and other service facilities shall be designed and/or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding. 8. All development proposals shall have adequate drainage provided to reduce exposure to flood damage. 9. All new and replacement water supply, sanitary sewage, or onsite disposai systems shall be designed and located so as to minimize or eliminate infiltration of floodwaters into them and discharge from the systems into floodwaters. 10. All subdivision proposals shall be consistent with the need to minimize flood damage. 11. All development proposals shall have public utilities and facilities, such as sewer, gas, electrical, and water systems, located and constructed to minimize flood damage. 12. All manufactured homes to be placed within the Flood Regulatory District must be elevated and anchored to resist flotation, collapse or lateral movement and capable of resisting the hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads created by the 100-year flood. Methods of anchoring may include, but are not limited to, use of over-the-top and frame ties to ground anchors. Specific requirements may be: a. Over-the-top ties shall be provided at each of the four (4) corners of the manufactured home, with two (2) additional ties per side at intermediate locations and manufactured homes less than fifty (50) feet long requiring one (1) additional tie per side; b. Frame ties shall be provided at each corner of the home, with five (5) additional ties per side at intermediate points and manufactured homes less than fifty (50) feet long requiring four (4) additional ties per side; c. All components of the anchoring system shall be capable of carrying a force of four thousand eight hundred (4,800) pounds; and d. Any additions to the manufactured home shall be similarly anchored. 13. Any fill or deposition of materials must be shown to have some beneficial purpose and the amount thereof will not be greater than is necessary to achieve that purpose, as demonstrated by a plan submitted by the owner showing the final dimensions of the proposed fill or other material and the use to which the filled land will be put. 14. Any fll or deposition that does reduce hydraulic capacity shall require appropriate hydraulic studies including an equal degree of encroachment analysis and a review of the urban impact of such reduction. bttp://Iibrary4.municode.com/mcc/DocView/1 1 707/1 / 143/1 52?hilite=floodplain;floodplai... 10/17/2007 ARTICLE VIII. FLOODPLAIN CONTROL Page 10 of 16 15. Any fill or deposition will be protected against erosion by riprap, strong vegetative cover, bulkheading, or other accepted means of erosion protection. 16. All fences shall be designed so that the bottom portion, except for supporting fence posts, are elevated one (1) foot above base flood elevation or in a breakaway design if approved by the floodplain administrator. (Ord. No. 2001-1215, § 1, 2-26-01) Sec. 26-807. Nonconforming uses. The existing lawful use of a structure or premises which is not in conformity with the provisions of these regulations may be continued subject to the following conditions: A. No such use shall be expanded or enlarged except in conformity with the provisions of these regulations. B. No substantial improvement to any nonconforming structure over the life of the structure shall be allowed unless the nonconforming use is permanently changed to a conforming use. C. If such use is discontinued for twelve (12) consecutive months, any future use of the building and premises shall conform to these regulations. D. Uses or adjuncts thereof which are nuisances shall not be permitted to continue as nonconforming uses. E. Any alteration, addition or repair to any nonconforming structure permitted pursuant to subsection B., above, shall be protected by floodproofing measures pursuant to section 26-808C.4.a. (Ord. No. 2001-1215, § 1, 2-26-01) Sec. 26-808. Administration. A. Floodplain administrator. The city engineer of the City of Wheat Ridge or his designee shall be the floodplain administrator. The duties of the administrator shall include, but not be limited to: 1. Coordination between departments and divisions: a. Coordinate the application, permit, review, appeal, certification and enforcement processes between the office of the city engineer and the department of community developmenYs divisions of planning, building, and code enforcement as appropriate to ensure compliance with these regulations and an efficient use of staff. b. All applications and certifications shall be submitted to the department of community development from which further routing shall occur. c. All administrative decisions require the property to be posted for fifteen (15) days. If no protests are filed, the permit may be issued by the floodplain administrator. If a protest is filed, then a hearing before the board of adjustment will be scheduled. 2. Development permit review: a. Review all development permits, which includes building, miscellaneous and fill permits, to determine whether a property is within the Flood Regulatory District http://library4.municode.com/mcc/DocView/] 1707/1/143/152?hilite=floodplain;floodplai... 10/17/2007 ARTICLE VIIL FLOODPLAIN CONTROL Page 11 of 16 and that the applicable requirements of these regulations have been satisfied. b. Review all development permits to determine that all necessary permits have been obtained from federal, state or local governmental agencies from which prior approval is required. 3. Information to be obtained and maintained: a. Obtain certification from applicanYs engineer or architect and record the actual elevation (in relation to mean sea level) of the lowest floor (including basement) of all new or substantially improved structures. b. Maintain for public inspection all records pertaining to the provisions of these regulations. c. All records required by these regulations shall be maintained with the associated development permits in the department of community development. 4. Use of other base flood data. When base flood elevation data has not been provided by the applicant or his representative, the floodplain administrator may obtain, review, and reasonably utilize any base flood and floodway elevation data available from federai, state or other sources as criteria for requiring that new construction, substantial improvements or other development in the Flood Regulatory District in order to administer subsections 26-806C., D. and F. 5. Alteration or relocation of watercourses: a. No alteration or relocation of a watercourse shall occur without the approval of the floodplain administrator. Consideration of gravel extraction operations shall be in accordance with state law (C.R.S. § 3-4-1-301). b. Upon receiving approval, the applicant shall notify adjacent communities and the Colorado Water Conservation Board prior to any alteration or relocation of a watercourse and submit evidence of such notification to the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The applicant shall provide all data required by the Federal Emergency Management Agency for a letter of map revision. c. The carrying capacity of an altered or relocated watercourse shall be maintained. 6. Interpretation of flood insurance rate map (FIRM) boundaries. The floodplain administrator shall make interpretations, where needed, as to the exact location of the boundaries of the areas of special flood hazards (for example, where there appears to be a conflict between a mapped boundary and actual feld conditions). Any person contesting the location of the boundary shall be given a reasonable opportunity to appeal the interpretation as provided in subsection B., below. B. Mapping disputes. The following procedure shall be used by the floodplain administrator in deciding contested cases in which the location of a district boundary is disputed: 1. In all cases, the person contesting the location of the district boundary shall be given a reasonable opportunity to submit his own technical evidence if he so desires. The floodplain administrator shall not allow deviations from the boundary line as mapped. If the evidence clearly and conclusively establishes that the mapped location of the line is incorrect, a Federal Emergency Management Agency letter of map revision must be completed by the applicant prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. The administrator shall render a written opinion within thirty (30) days following receipt of the applicanYs technical evidence setting forth the findings of fact and the reasons for the decision. 3. Contestants shall have the right to appeal such decisions to the board of adjustment. http://library4.municode.com/mce/DocView/I 1707/1/ 143/152?hilite=floodplain;floodplai... 10/17/2007 ARTICLE VIII. FLOODPLAIN CONTROL Page 12 of 16 Application for appeal must be made within thirty (30) days. C. Special exception permits: 1. Application. There shall be two (2) types of special exception permits: Class I and Class il. Any use listed in section 26-806C. (special exceptions--Class I) may be allowed only upon issuance of a Class I special exception permit by the floodplain administrator. Any use listed in section 26-806D. (special exceptions--Class II) may be allowed only upon issuance of a Class II special exception permit by the board of adjustment. The approval of either special exception permit does not substitute for any other permit thatmay be required by city ordinance, such as building, miscellaneous, or fill permits. 2. Submittal requirements. Pursuant to a special exception permit application, the administrator may: a. Require the applicant to submit, at the time of application, a plan certified by a registered engineer, competent in open-channel hydraulics, which accurately locates the applicanYs property with respect to the Flood Regulatory District limits, channei of stream, existing Flood Regulatory District developments, together with aIl pertinent information such as: the nature of the proposal; legal description of the property; fill limits and elevations; building's lowest floor elevations in relation to the datum used on the Federal Emergency Management Agency map and study; floodproofing measures and elevation in relation to mean sea level to which any structure has been floodproofed; a report covering the effects of equal degree of encroachment of other nearby residents of the Flood Regulatory District; and a description to the extent to which any watercourse will be altered or relocated as a result of the proposed development. In addition, all subdivision proposals and other proposed new developments which are located in any Flood Regulatory District shall include within such proposals base flood elevations. b. Require the applicant to furnish as much of the following additional information as is deemed necessary by the floodplain administrator for the evaluation of the effects of the proposal upon flood flows and floodplain storage and to render a decision on the proposed Flood Regulatory District use: (1) A typical valley cross-section showing the channel of the stream, the floodplain adjoining each side of the channel, cross-sectional area to be occupied by the proposed development, and high-water information. (2) Plan (surface view) showing elevations or contours of the ground; pertinent structure, fill or storage elevations; size, location and spatial arrangement of all proposed and existing structures on the site; location and elevations of streets, water supply and sanitary facilities; soil types; and other pertinent information. (3) Profile showing the slope of the 100-year flood and the bottom of the channel or thalweg of the stream. (4) Specifications for building construction and materials, floodproofing, filling, dredging, grading, channel improvement, storage of materials, water supply and sanitary facilities. (5) Hydraulic calculations for all proposed channelization. 3. Factors upon which the decision shall be based. The determination of the floodplain administrator or the board of adjustment on each special exemption permit shall be based on the effects of the proposed project with respect to the objectives and purpose of these regulations as stated in section 26-801. http://Iibrary4.municode.com/mcc/DocView/I 1707/1/ 143/ 152?hilite=floodplain;floodplai... 10/ 17/2007 ARTICLE VIII. FLOODPLAIN CONTROL Page 13 of 16 4. Conditions attached to special exception permits. Upon consideration of the factors listed above and purposes of these regulations, the floodplain administrator or board of adjustment may attach such conditions as deemed necessary in furthering the purposes of these regulations. A copy of these conditions shall be presented to the applicant and a copy of these conditions shall be transmitted to the chief building inspector, which shall be kept on file. Such conditions may include specifications for, without limitation because of specific enumeration, modification of sewage disposal and water supply facilities, modification of other waste disposal methods and facilities, landscaping periods of operation, operational controls, sureties, deed restrictions, and adequate floodproofing. a. Floodproofing: Special exception permits requiring floodproofing measures such as the following shall be designed consistent with the flood protection elevation for the particular area and flood velocities, forces and other factors associated with the flood protection elevation. The floodplain administrator shall require that the applicant submit a plan or document certified by a registered professional engineer that the floodproofing measures are consistent with the flood protection elevation for the particular area. Floodproofing measures may include the following: (1) Anchorage to resist flotation and lateral movement. (2) Installation of watertight doors, bulkheads and shutters. (3) Reinforcement of walls to resist water pressures. (4) Use of paints, membranes or mortars to reduce seepage of water through walls. (5) Addition of mass or weight to structures to resist flotation. (6) Installation of pumps to lower water levels in structures. (7) Construction of water supply and waste treatment systems to prevent the entrance of floodwaters. (8) Pumping facilities for subsurface drainage systems for buildings to relieve external foundation wall and basement floor pressures. (9) Construction to resist rupture or collapse caused by water pressure or floating debris. (10) Cutoff valves on sewer lines or the elimination of gravity flow basement drains. Furthermore, measures must be taken to ensure that the construction does not in any way cause the 100-year flood to become more damaging to other residents within the Flood Regulatory District. 5. Class 1 special exemption permits; timeliness of decision. The floodplain administrator shall render, within thirty (30) days of receipt of all necessary application documents and materials, a written decision granting or denying a permit application. If a denial is made, the decision shall set forth the administrator's findings of fact and reasons for the denial. In the event the floodplain administrator fails to render a decision within said thirty (30) days, it shall be deemed that the application is denied and applicants shall have a right to appeal as provided herein. Applicants shall have the right to appeal any adverse decision to the board of adjustment. Such application for appeal must be made within thirty (30) days from the date of the floodplain administrator's http://library4.municode.com/mcc/DocView/11707/1/143/152?hilite=floodplain;tloodplai... 10/17/2007 ARTICLE VIIL FLOODPLAIN CONTROL Page 14 of 16 decision. D. Review by the board of adjustment. 1. The board of adjustment of the City of Wheat Ridge shall hear and decide appeals of Class I special exemption permits which have been denied by the floodplain administrator and requests for Class II special exemption permits as provided within these regulations. 2. The board of adjustment shall hear and decide appeals of Class I special exemption permits when it is alleged there is an error in any requirement, decision or determination made by the floodplain administrator in the enforcement or administration of these regulations. 3. Those aggrieved by the decision of the board of adjustment may appeal such decisions to the Jefferson County District Court, as provided by the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws. 4. In passing upon such application, the board of adjustment shall consider all technical evaluation, all relevant factors, standards specified in other sections of these regulations, and: a. The danger that materials may be swept into other lands to the injury of others; b. The danger to life and property due to flooding or erosion damage; c. The susceptibility of the proposed facility and its contents to flood damage and the effect of such damage on the individual owner; d. The importance of the services provided by the proposed facility to the community; e. The necessity to the facility of a waterfront location, where applicable; f. The availability of alternative locations for the proposed use which are not subject to flooding or erosion damage; g. The compatibility of the proposed use with the existing and anticipated development; h. The relationship of the proposed use to the comprehensive development plan and floodplain management program for the area; i. The safety of access to the property during times of flood for ordinary and emergency vehicles; j. The expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise and sediment transport of the floodwaters expected at the site; k. The costs of providing governmental services during and after flood conditions, including maintenance and repair of public utilities and facilities, such as sewer, gas, electrical, and water systems, streets and bridges. 5. Upon consideration of the factors of subsection D.4., above, the board of adjustment may attach such conditions to the granting of special exemption permits as it deems necessary to further the purposes of these regulations. 6. The floodplain administrator shall maintain the records of all appeal actions, including technical information, and report any special exemption permits to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, upon request. E. Conditions for special exemption permits. http://Iibrary4.municode.com/mee/DoeView/I 1 707/1 /143/1 52?hilite=floodplain;floodplai... 10/17/2007 ART[CLE VIII. FLOODPLAIN CONTROL Page 15 of 16 1. Special exemption permits may be issued for the reconstruction, rehabilitation or restoration of structures listed on the National Register of Historic Places or the state inventory of historic places, without regard to the procedures set forth in the remainder of this section. 2. Special exemption permits shall not be issued within any designated Floodway District. 3. Special exemption permits shall only be issued upon a determination that the special exemption permit is the minimum necessary, considering the flood hazard, to afford relief. 4. Special exemption permits shall only be issued upon: a. A showing of good and sufficient cause; b. A determination that failure to grant the special exemption permit would result in exceptional hardship to the applicant; and c. A determination that the granting of a special exemption permit will not result in increased flood heights, additional threats to pubiic safety, extraordinary public expense or create nuisances, cause fraud on or victimization of the public as identified in section 26-801(c), or conflict with existing local laws or ordinances. (Ord. No. 2001-1215, § 1, 2-26-01; Ord. No. 1288, 1, 2, 5-12-03) Sec. 26-809. Certificate of compliance. A. No vacant land shall be occupied or used, and no building hereafter erected, altered or moved into the Flood Regulatory District until a special exemption permit has been issued by the floodplain administrator or the board of adjustment indicating that the use or proposed use or structure complies with the provisions herein. B. A certificate of compliance shall be applied for upon completion of any project, construction or use for which a special exception permit was granted, and the excepted land use shall not commence until a certificate of compliance is issued. C. Issuance of a certificate of compliance by the floodplain administrator shall be required before a certificate of occupancy may be issued by the department of community development. The certificate of compliance shall indicate that there has been compliance with these Flood Regulatory District regulations and any conditions attached to a special exemption. D. The floodplain administrator shall require the applicant, when applicable, to submit a certification by a registered professional engineer or architect that the finished fill and building floor elevations, floodproofing measures or other flood protection, factors were accomplished in compliance with the provisions of these regulations and any conditions attached to a special exemption permit. The floodplain administrator shall within ten (10) days after receipt of such certification from the applicant issuea certificate of compliance only if the building or premises and the proposed use thereof conform with all the requirements of these regulations and any conditions attached to a special exemption permit. Said submitted certification, along with a copy of the certificate of compliance, shall be kept on record in the department of community development. (Ord. No. 2001-1215, § 1, 2-26-01) Sec. 26-810. Enforcement and penalties. http://library4.municode.com/mcc/DocView/I 1707/l/143/152?hilite=floodplain;floodplai... 10/17/2007 ARTICLE VIII. FLOODPLAIN CONTROL Page 16 of 16 Every structure, building, fill or development placed or maintained within the Flood Regulatory District in violation of these regulations is a public nuisance and the creation thereof may be enjoined and maintenance thereof may be abated by action at suit of the City of Wheat Ridge, the state or any citizen thereof. Any person who places or maintains any structure, building, fill or development within the Flood Regulatory District in violation of these regulations shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, uponconviction thereof, shall be fined not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) or imprisoned not more than one (1) year or both. Each day during which such violation exists is a separate offense. In the event it becomes necessary for the city to bring action to enjoin or abate any such violation of this section, the city shall be entitled to recover, in addition to any fine or penalty imposed hereby, its cost of bringing said action and/or abating any such structure, building, fill or development placed or maintained within the Flood Regulatory District, which costs shall include attorneys' fees as well as the actual costs incurred by the city. (Ord. No. 2001-1215, § 1, 2-26-01) Secs. 26-811--26-900. Reserved. http://Iibrary4.municode.com/mcc/DocView/I 1707/1 /143/152?hilite=floodplain;floodplai... 10/17/2007