Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWA-05-097500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Wheat Telephone 303/235-2846 Ridge FAX 303/235-2857 June 8, 2005 Jerry DiTullio Wheat Ridge Housing Authority 7500 W. 29 h Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Dear Mr. DiTullio: RE: Case No. WA-05-09 Please be advised that at its meeting of May 26, 2005, the Board of Adjustment APPROVED the request for a 5-foot side yard setback variance from the 10-foot side setback requirement for detached garages over 8 feet in height on property zoned Residential Three and located at 4501 Everett Street for the following reasons: 1. The applicant has very limited options for placement of garages sufficient to accommodate an 8-unit multi-family structure without the need for a variance. 2. Garages are seen by Jefferson County Housing Authority and Wheat Ridge Housing Authority as very much affecting the likelihood of achieving the goals of both Jefferson County and Wheat Ridge Housing Authorities. 3. Approval of the variance would hopefully provide an incentive to make improvements to a dilapidated property and perhaps be influential for adjacent properties to do or request the same. 4. The intent of the property being owned by the Wheat Ridge Housing Authority is to provide a public service resulting in a benefit to the community. 5. The adjacent property to the north is also zoned multi-family. 6. The corner lot status of this apartment building places the building with a significant double front yard setback therefore limiting available space in the rear and side yards. This has caused a hardship in the design of a viable project. 7. The 10-foot required setbacks do not seem to provide a definable benefit to this neighborhood due to the configuration of adjacent occupancies. 8. There has been no neighborhood opposition registered. With the following conditions: 1. If it is determined that any portion of the structure is within the 100-year floodplain, a Class I floodplain exception will be required prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. The structure shall not have an exterior with visible metal materials. Jerry DiTullio Page 2 June 8, 2005 The setback area being varied behind the garages shall be enclosed for security, prevention of storage of illicit materials, and graffiti control. Enclosed is a copy of the Certificate of Resolution, as well as a draft copy of the minutes, stating the Board's decision which became effective the date of the meeting, May 26, 2005. This variance shall automatically expire within one hundred eighty (180) days of the date it was granted, November 22, 2005, unless a building permit has been obtained. Please feel free to contact me at (303) 235-2846 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Kathy Field Administrative Assistant Enclosures: Certificate of Resolution Draft of Minutes cc: Henry Wehrdt Jefferson County Housing Authority 7490 W. 45th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 WA-05-09 (case file) Building File \\srv kng-001\usenVdield\Kathy\BOA\CORRESP\2004\wa0509approval.wpd CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTION 1, Ann Lazzeri, Secretary to the City of Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment, do hereby certify that the following Resolution was duly adopted in the City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, on the 26th day of May, 2005. CASE NO: WA-05-09 APPLICANT'S NAME: Wheat Ridge Housing Authority LOCATION: 4501 Everett Street WHEREAS, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and WHEREAS, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-05-09 is an appeal to this Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and WHEREAS, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law, and in recognition that there WERE NO protests registered against it; and WHEREAS, the relief applied for MAY be granted without detriment to the public welfare and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-05-09 be, and hereby is, APPROVED. TYPE OF VARIANCE: A 5foot side setback variance from the 10 foot side setback requirement for detached garages over 8 feet in height on property zoned Residential-Three. FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. The applicant has very limited options for placement of garages sufficient to accommodate an 8-unit multi-family structure without the need for a variance. 2. Garages are seen by Jeffco Housing and Wheat Ridge Housing Authority as very much affecting the likelihood of achieving the goals of both Jeffco and Wheat Ridge Housing Authorities. Approval of the variance would hopefully provide an incentive to make improvements to a dilapidated property and perhaps be influential for adjacent properties to do or request the same. 4. The intent of the property being owned by the Wheat Ridge Housing Authority is to provide a public service resulting in a benefit to the community. 5. The adjacent property to the north is also zoned multi-family. 6. The comer lot status of this apartment building places the building with a significant double front yard setback therefore limiting available space in the rear and side yards. This has caused a hardship in the design of a viable project. Board of Adjustment Resolution No. WA-05-09 Page two (2) The 10-foot required setbacks do not seem to provide a definable benefit to this neighborhood due to the configuration of adjacent occupancies. There has been no neighborhood opposition registered. WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. If it is determined that any portion of the structure is within the 100-year floodplain; a Class I floodplain exception will be required prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. The structure shall not have an exterior with visible metal materials. 3. The setback area being varied behind the garages shall be enclosed for security, prevention of storage of illicit materials, and graffiti control. VOTE: YES: ABBOTT, BELL, BLAIR, BYBEE, HOVLAND, PAGE NO: HOWARD ABSENT: DRDA DISPOSITION: A request for a 5 foot side setback variance from the 10 foot side setback requirement for detached garages over 8 feet in height on property zoned Residential-Three was APPROVED. ADOPTED and made effective this 26th day of May. 2005. an Bell, Vice Chair oard of Adjustment Ann Lazzeri, Secretary Board of Adjustment T It was moved by Board Member BLAIR and seconded by Board Member BYBEE to continue Case No. WA-05-08 to the June Board meeting. The motion passed unanimously. B. Case No. WA-05-09: An application filed by the Wheat Ridge Housing Authority for approval of a 5-foot side yard setback variance from the I0-foot side setback requirement for detached garages over 8 feet in height on property zoned Residential Three and located at 4501 Everett Street. This case was presented by Jeff Hirt. He entered all pertinent documents into the record and advised the Board there was jurisdiction to hear the case. He reviewed the staff report and digital presentation. Staff recommended approval of the application for reasons outlined in the staff report. Board Member HOVLAND commented that this request for a variance is due to a zoning change for the R-1 zone district to require setbacks relative to building height and asked why this requirement would apply to multi-family dwellings. Meredith Reckert explained that R-3 zoning also allows single family structures and therefore the setback requirement applies to all structures in the zone district. Board Member BYBEE commented that he could find no reasons not to approve this application. Board Member HOWARD suggested that setback requirements be revisited citing an example that presently a 20-foot setback would be required for two garages built adjacent to each other. Jerry DiTullio 3250 Newland Street Mr. DiTullio, chairman of the Wheat Ridge Housing Authority, was sworn in by Vice Chair BELL. He stated that, following the denial of a previous request for variance, the number of garages for the project has been reduced from six to five. The depth of the garages has also been reduced from 24 to 21 feet. He asked the Board to approve the variance based on the following reasons: There has been no neighborhood opposition. • Staff has recommended approval. The Housing Authority will be improving a dilapidated property. Garages will reduce on-street parking. • The l0-foot setback on this particular property serves no purpose in that the garages would face a back yard and would not therefore infringe on the adjacent property. • Approval of the variance would not set a precedent for any other future projects within the city. Board of Adjustment 05-26-05 - "RAFT Henry Wehrdt I r" 2659 South Pitkin Way, Aurora Mr. Wehrdt, Jefferson County Housing Authority, was sworn in by Vice Chair BELL. He is also project manager for the subject property. He explained the garages have been designed with hip rather than peak roofs. Without the variance, there would be more opportunity for continued graffiti problems on the buildings. With the requested setback, the area could be fenced which would reduce the amount of weeds and graffiti. The reduction in the number of garages would also increase the distance from the garages to existing structures by an additional 6 feet. This project will not only provide affordable home ownership, but will greatly improve the appearance and quality of the neighborhood. In response to a question from Board Member PAGE, Mr. Wehrdt explained that parking will be a cooperative effort with the other multi-family units. The parking area and driveway will be paved. In response to a question from Board Member ABBOTT, Mr. Wehrdt stated that units with garages sell first. Garages also improve the property by providing off-street parking as well as some additional storage space for personal items. Cheryl Brungardt 5621 West 36`h Place Ms. Brungardt was sworn in by Vice Chair BELL. She is a member of the Wheat Ridge Housing Authority. She stated that housing units with garages sell quickly and provide safe off-street parking for the homeowners. She pointed out that the majority of homeowners in the Housing Authority properties only have one vehicle. There are also individuals who do not own vehicles and that is one reason the Housing Authority likes to choose units that are near public transportation. This project will mostly likely encourage surrounding property owners to improve their properties. There were no other individuals present who wished to address this case. Vice Chair BELL closed the public hearing. Upon a motion by Board Member ABBOTT and second by Board Member BLAIR the following resolution was stated: Whereas, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and Whereas, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-05-09 is an appeal to this Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and Whereas, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law, and in recognition that there were no protests registered against it; and Whereas, the relief applied for may be granted without detriment to the public Board of Adjustment 05-26-05 welfare and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge. Now, therefore, be it resolved that Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA- 05-09 be, and hereby is, approved. Type of Variance: A 5-foot side yard setback variance from the 10-foot side setback requirement for detached garages over 8 feet in height on property zoned Residential Three. DRAFT For the following reasons: 1. The applicant has very limited options for placement of garages sufficient to accommodate an 8-unit multi-family structure without the need for a variance. i. Garages are seen by Jefferson County Housing Authority and Wheat Ridge Housing Authority as very much affecting the likelihood of achieving the goals of both Jefferson County and Wheat Ridge Housing Authorities. 3. Approval of the variance would hopefully provide an incentive to make improvements to a dilapidated property and perhaps be influential for adjacent properties to do or request the same. 4. The intent of the property being owned by the Wheat Ridge Housing Authority is to provide a public service resulting in a benefit to the community. 5. The adjacent property to the north is also zoned multi-family. 6. The corner lot status of this apartment building places the building with a significant double front yard setback therefore limiting available space in the rear and side yards. This has caused a hardship in the design of a viable project. 7. The 10-foot required setbacks do not seem to provide a definable benefit to this neighborhood due to the configuration of adjacent occupancies. 8. There has been no neighborhood opposition registered. With the following conditions: 1. If it is determined that any portion of the structure is within the 100-year floodplain, a Class I floodplain exception will be required prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. The structure shall not have an exterior with visible metal materials. 3. The setback area being varied behind the garages shall be enclosed for security, prevention of storage of illicit materials, and graffiti control. Board Member BLAIR commented that the function and duty of the Wheat Ridge Housing Authority is to provide a public service and the proposed project will improve Board of Adjustment 05-26-05 PRAFT the quality of the neighborhood. Board Member HOVLAND commented that the zoning code amendment which increased setbacks from 5-feet doesn't make sense in this area. There would have been no need for a variance in this case without the zoning code amendment. Board Member BELL stated that she would support the motion because of the location of the garages. The bulk plane in this situation is not as much an issue as it would be in a single family residential zone with a single story house adjacent to a single story house. It was moved by Board Member HOWARD that the variance request be changed from 5 feet to 3 feet. The motion died for lack of a second. The motion passed 6-1 with Board Member HOWARD voting no. C. Case No. WA-05-10: An application filed by Holiday Inn Express Hotel and Suites for approval of a variance of 10 feet from the required 30 foot setback from the right-of-way for signs over 25 feet high resulting in a 20-foot setback from the right-of-way for property zoned Commercial One and located at 10101 West I-70 Frontage Road South. This case was presented by Jeff Hirt. He entered all pertinent documents into the record and advised the Board there was jurisdiction to hear the case. He reviewed the staff report and digital presentation. Staff recommended approval of the application for reasons outlined in the staff report. Board Member HOVLAND asked if there were any safety or sight triangle issues involved with the proposed location of the sign. Jeff Hirt stated that this matter was not referred to the traffic engineer because the sign will not be located at the intersection of two streets where sight triangle regulation would apply. In response to a question from Board Member ABBOTT, Mr. Hirt stated that the size of the proposed sign is well below the allowed square footage. Todd Brummond Holiday Inn Express Mr. Brummond was sworn in by Vice Chair BELL. Mr. Brummond is managing member of the ownership group of the Holiday Inn Express Hotel and Suites. The required 30-foot setback for the sign would infringe upon the Valley Water District water easement and therefore a request for variance became necessary. There were no other individuals present who wished to address this case. Vice Chair BELL closed the public hearing. Board of Adjustment - 5 - 05-26-05 0616 O O o O r.r. O O Owe 0 ao ~ O o m ?OIL ara O 7J /v CD CD ('D CD CD P7'~ n n y a~ to O C-D /V lu- ~ W I.- - r° (D. CD (,'Dt 't & & f4 n uq ~ . vq ` ~ • IA IA CD 00 y r-+ CD CD CD v~ CD CD CD CD CD CD (D o0 00 P CD CD CCD V-+- e-+ ~"d O O N O UQ a~ 3r. r i n' i i i ~i !i er cr b fit O z 1 U) m n O Z N T, m !r m D 'O z 71 r- 0 O v r !D Z D z ,d X O O -n D Z D Z m o ~o m r m . Z M ~ r a x:ss. i{p 4_o A6 "a M C r t V! ~ M m I~ C 0 IrD 01 I.d • b O O tz r-+ CD A~ O r 0 C C n b O r O O UQ O rr- A~ n b O r O O UQ O e-f cam. n b O r 0 0 z 0 C.r. n b O CD r 0 0 0 v. n b O r O O ~Q rr- O~ V1 •P m ' fD ~e aCD IrD f9 C C O eD rD CD C r IQ A; 0 C" • CD 'J K n fD A~ W N ~ O aroma ~ , J ~ ~ O¢ O f9 Q+ K A~ ~O ~ ¢ rA UQ ~ C 01 r) 01 i,J r.. N ¢ ~71 (D CD A~ n v d p C¢D n O n UQ A~ CD p A~ CD BCD CD ° d t t O- (D p O coo UQ d CD M CD P) ~ ¢ O CD r-y D ° a CD 0 c Q- ~c ¢ CD Q- PD. ° (D (D 0 cn p7- CD Cn 0 (D C) (D a (D CD o 0 o a CdD ~ O O " CD CD CD O CD d ¢ CD CD CD . O p d .d v O CD P U CD (D ~ CD CD O CD A> ~4 -P W N CDI CD CD . (D CD CD N CD ~ Q- O ~ 11) O h p d Cr CD CD O C (CD 0 A~ ,oo CD o CCD CD d `O (D CD v' ~ . ~ O C O ~ d ~ N N d 0 ~71 ¢ CD o CD N ~C CAD `a O UQ O CD ~ y CD c ~c CD N O ¢ O O ° ~ o o ~ c ° O CD C ~ ~ O ~ n O CD O c~ PUBLIC HEARING ROSTER CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT May 26, 2005 Case No. WA-05-09: An application filed by the Wheat Ridge Housing Authority for approval of a 5 foot side yard setback variance from the 10 foot side setback requirement for detached garages over 8 feet in height on property zoned Residential-Three (R-3) and located at 4501 Everett St. Name Address In favor/Opposed ~Avv.2 ~~V0~ m TO: CASE NO. & NAME: ACTION REQUESTED: CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT Board of Adjustment CASE MANAGER: Jeff Hirt WA-05-09/Wheat Ridge DATE OF MEETING: May 26, 2005 Housing Authority Approval of a 5 foot side yard setback variance from the 10 foot side yard setback requirement for detached garages over 8 feet in height on property zoned Residential Three (R-3). LOCATION OF REQUEST: 4501 Everett Street APPLICANT (S): OWNER (S): APPROXIMATE AREA: PRESENT ZONING: Wheat Ridge Housing Authority Wheat Ridge Housing Authority 20,052 square feet (.46 acres) Residential-Three (R-3) ENTER INTO RECORD: (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) ZONING ORDINANCE (X) DIGITAL PRESENTATION Location Map ly e ❑ w E~ Q R-3 ❑ o U ~ 2 w w w w J w NE, w Subject C-1 C-2 .0 11 F-I= Board of Adjustment Case WA-05-09/Wheat Ridge Housing Authority 1 Jurisdiction All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. 1. REQUEST The property in question is located at 4501 Everett Street. The property has Residential Three (R-3) zoning. The applicant, Jerry DiTullio, Wheat Ridge Housing Authority chairperson, is requesting a variance on behalf of the owners, the Wheat Ridge Housing Authority (Exhibit 1, Application). The request is for approval of a 5 foot side yard setback variance from the required 10 foot side yard setback. Detached garages over 8 feet in height must be setback 10 feet from the side yard in the R-3 zone district. The applicant proposes to construct an approximately 1,302 square foot (62' X 21') detached garage on the property (Exhibit 2, Site Plan, Exhibit 3, Elevations). The proposed garage will be located 5 feet from the side property line on the north and 9 feet from the property line to the west. Per the Code of Laws, the minimum side and rear yard setback for a detached garage in the R-3 zone district is 5 feet if the structure is less than 8 feet in height, and 10 feet if the structure is over 8 feet in height. The proposed garage is over 8 feet in height; therefore the 10 foot setback requirement is applicable for both the side and rear yards. As a result, a variance of 5 feet to the side yard setback before the Board of Adjustment is required to allow for the proposed detached garage at the location shown on the site plan. The request is only for the side property line setback variance to the north. As the site plan shows the detached garage 9 feet from the rear property line to the west, a variance would be required to allow for this setback as well. This variance request however would be classified as a minor variance. Minor variances are requests for variances of 10 percent or less from the standard. Per Section 26-115 of the Code of Laws, the director of community development is empowered to decide upon applications for minor variances or waivers without a public hearing provided that the "findings of fact" support the request, all public notification procedures have been met, and no additional dwelling units would result from the request. A request for a variance to allow for a detached garage at this location was made before of the Board of Adjustment on March 24, 2005. This previous request was for approval of a 5 foot side and 5 foot rear yard setback variance from the 10 foot side yard and 10 foot rear yard setback requirement. The motion to approve the request failed, with 5 members voting yes, and 2 voting no; therefore the previous request was denied (Exhibit 4, Minutes). Per Section 26-107 (C) a new application for substantially the same development process may not be refiled for one year after denial. It has been determined by the zoning administrator that this application is not substantially the same development process as the previous request. The R-3 zone district also specifies that the maximum allowable size for a detached garage is 600 square feet per unit. The property has an existing 8 unit multi-family residential structure on it; therefore the maximum size allowed for a detached garage on this property is 4,800 square feet. Access into the proposed garage will be from the existing access off of 45th Place, going north into the property. A substantial portion of the property lies within the 100 year floodplain. It is not certain at this time whether any portion of the proposed garage will lie within the floodplain. If it is determined that it will, a Class I floodplain exception will be required to construct the garage. This may be placed as a condition upon the variance request if approved. A Class I floodplain special exception permit can be approved administratively by the City's Flood Plain Administrator. Board of Adjustment Case WA-05-09/Wheat Ridge Housing Authority It should also be noted that the property is a corner lot, making the setback requirements more restrictive. The R-3 zone district regulations state that any side or rear yard which abuts a public street shall have a setback of 30 feet for all structures (Exhibit 5, Buildable Portion of Lot). Goals of the Wheat Ridge Housing Authority are to increase the number of owner-occupied units in the City, increase property values and provide affordable housing. Since its inception in 2001, the WRHA has successfully bought, rehabilitated and reintroduced 24 townhouse units into the City's housing stock. Proposed improvements to 4501 Everett include new floor coverings, new windows and kitchen remodeling (new countertops, cabinets and appliances) (Exhibit 6, Proposed Improvements). It is the opinion of staff that providing affordable housing in Wheat Ridge is an important public service, and any reasonable accommodation for this would be beneficial. The purpose of this variance request is to allow for a detached garage that is large enough to provide adequate off street parking for an 8 unit apartment complex given the setback constraints of a corner lot and the location of the existing multi-family structure. It has been expressed by the applicants that providing garage space is a very important amenity to potential buyers. In past projects done by the Wheat Ridge Housing Authority it has been expressed by the applicants that the units with garages were the first to sell. Placing the detached garage within setback requirements would also likely eliminate a large portion of the courtyard for buyers. It should be noted that in 2003, the setback requirement which is applicable to this variance was changed. Prior to the current regulation, adopted by City Council in 2003, the setback requirement was 5 feet in the R-3 zone district for detached garages, regardless of height. Therefore the proposed garage would have been allowed under the previous setback requirements. All other development standards have been met with the proposed structure, with the exception of a possible subsequent minor variance request for the rear yard setback to the west as noted above. II. SITE PLAN The property is approximately 20,052 square feet, or .46 acres. The property measures 142 feet wide with a depth of 140 feet (Exhibit 7, Improvement Location Certificate). There is currently no covered parking on the property for the 8 residential units. Residents park in a small paved area behind the building, accessed off of 450' Place, or on the street along Everett Street and 45s' Place. The area surrounding the property consists of multifamily to the north and the west, a park to the east, and a commercial use to the south. There is a common paved area that encompasses three different properties, including the property in question. Three different multifamily buildings have unimpeded access to this paved area, although it does encompass three different properties. II. VARIANCE CRITERIA Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a variance request: 1. Can the property in question yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located? If the request is denied, the property may still receive a reasonable return in use. The property may still be used as a multi-family residence without the need for any variances. 2. If the variance were granted, would it alter the essential character of the locality? The request may have an effect on the essential character of the locality. None of the surrounding multi- family residential structures have garages. Board of Adjustment 3 Case WA-05-09/Wheat Ridge Housing Authority 3. Does the particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved result in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out? There are no unique physical conditions related to shape or topography that render any portion of the property in question unbuildable. The property in question is square in shape and flat but is a comer lot resulting in more restrictive setback requirements. 4. Has the alleged difficulty or hardship been created by any person presently having an interest in the property? The applicant has created his own hardship by requesting a garage in this location. However, there are limited options on the property for placement of a garage to accommodate an 8 unit residential structure given the setback constraints and location of the existing structure. 5. Would the granting of the variance be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located, by, among other things, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or substantially diminishing or impairing property values within the neighborhood? Approval of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the area. There may be a slight decrease in the supply of light and air to the properties to the north and west, given that approval of the variance would result in a structure closer to the property line than is allowed under current development standards. The request would not substantially increase the congestion in public streets, increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety. Property values of the property in question and adjacent properties will be improved as a result of this request, as it is the opinion of staff that the property in question and adjacent properties are in need of improvements. 6. If criteria 1 through 5 are found, then, would the granting of the variance result in a benefit or contribution to the neighborhood or the community, as distinguished from an individual benefit on the part of the applicant, or would granting of the variance result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities? The request may result in a substantial benefit or contribution to the neighborhood or community distinguished from an individual benefit on the part of the applicant. It is the opinion of staff that the property in question, and adjacent properties are in need of improvements. Providing an incentive to make physical improvements to a dilapidated property may be beneficial not only to the property in question, but to the surrounding area as a result. Property owners often take note of improvements made to adjacent properties and desire to do the same. The property in question is owned by the Wheat Ridge Housing Authority, the intent of which is to provide a public service resulting in a contribution to the community. The request would not result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities. III. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Upon review of the above request, staff concludes that the above criteria are supportive of the variance request. Staff has found that there are unique circumstances attributed to these requests that would warrant approval of a variance. Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL for the following reasons: Board of Adjustment 4 Case WA-05.09/Wheat Ridge Housing Authority 1. The applicant has very limited options for placement of a garage to accommodate an 8 unit multifamily structure without the need for a variance or variances. 2. Approval of the variance would hopefully provide an incentive to make improvements to a dilapidated property, and perhaps be influential for adjacent properties to do or request the same. 3. The intent of the property being owned by the Wheat Ridge Housing Authority is to provide a public service resulting in a benefit to the community. 4. The adjacent property to the north is also zoned multi-family. 5. The corner lot status of this apartment building places the building with a significant double front yard setback therefore limiting available space in the rear for a detached garage. 6. The 10 foot required setbacks do not seem to provide a definable benefit to this neighborhood as compared to a less dense location. With the following conditions: 1. If it is determined that any portion of the structure is within the 100 year floodplain, a Class I floodplain exception will be required prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. The structure shall not have an exterior with visible metal materials. Board of Adjustment 5 Case WA-05.09/wheat Ridge Housing Authority LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION Community Development Department 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Phone (303) 235-2846 (Please print or t)Pe all information) Applicant Wheat Ridge Housing Auth. Address 7500 W. 29th Avenue Phone 303-235-2846 City Wheat Ridge State Colorado Zip 80033 Fax Owner Wheat Ridge Housing Auth. Address 7500 W. 29th Avehue Phone 303-235-2846 City Wheat Ridge State Colorado Zip 80033 Fax Jerry DiTull a A) 7500 W. eht for WRIi 29th Avenue 303-235-284( Contact Henry Wehrdt g Address 7490 W. 45th Avenue Phone 303-422-8600 City Wheat Ridge State Colorado Zip 80033 Fax__303-422-3229 (The person listed as contact will be contacted to answer questions regarding this application, provide additional information when necessary, post public hearing signs, will receive a copy of the staff report prior to Public Hearing, and shall be responsible for forwarding all verbal and written communication to applicant and owner.) Location of request (address): 4501 Everett Street Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request) Application subminal requirements on reverse side ❑ Change of zone or zone conditions ❑ Special Use Permit ❑ Consolidation Plat ❑ Subdivision: Minor (5 lots or less) ❑ Flood Plain Special Exception ❑ Subdivision: Major (More than 5 lots) ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Right of Way Vacation ❑ Planned Building Group ❑ Temporary Use, Building, Sign ❑ Site Development Plan approval 6a Variance/Waiver (from Section ) ❑ Other: Detailed description of request: 1: ).Setback to north property line. (side yard) Required information: Assessors Parcel Number: Size of Lot (acres or square footage): Current Zoning: R-3 Proposed Zoning: Current Use: Proposed Use: I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above, without whose consent the requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners must submit power-of-attornZfr the owner which approved of this action on his behalf. ZWOOfU Signature of Applicant -A Subscribed d swom tome this rJp day of cA ~p t d .2005 "`Q.."`777_17a~"` No Pub c My commission expires4,,,)3- 06 To be filled out by staff: Datereceived Case No. V/A-0.SO g Comp Plan Desig. EXHIBIT I Quarter Section Map /V>carL Related Case No. Case Manager_ fyt-/K T GENERAL NOTES 1. THE WORD'CONTRACTOR'AS USED HEREIN SHALL MEAN THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTORS AND All PERSONS DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY EMPLOYED BY THEM. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL ORDINANCES, RULES. REGULATIONS AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF AN PUBLIC AGENCY PAVING JURISDICTION ON THIS PROJECT AND SHALL NOTIFY OWNER IMMEDIATELY UPON BECOMING AWARE THAT ANY SPECT OF THE PROJECT DESCRIBED HEREIN IS AT VARIANCE THEREWITH 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE ACCEPTABLE TO OWNER PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. 4. BY SUBMITTAL OF BID CONTRACTOR WARRANTS TO OWNER THAT ALL MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT TO BE FURNISHED ARE NEW UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE AND ALL WORK WILL BE OF GOOD QUALITY AND FREE FROM FAULTS AND DEFECTS. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL NSR SITE ANO VERIFYALLEXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL OF BID. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREIN AND REPORT ALL DISCREPANCIES TO OWNER PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL OF BID. 7. ALLSTANDARONOTESCOWNNEDHEREINARETYPICALUNLE58NOTEDOTHERWISE 8. ALL TRADE NAMES AND BRAND NAMES CONTAINED HEREIN ESTABLISH QUALITY STANDARDS, SUBSTITUTIONS ARE PRMITTED WITH PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE OWNER. 9. WHERE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS FOR APART OF THIS PROJECT ARE NOT SHOWN THE WORK SHALL SE THE SAME AS OTHER SIMILAR WORK FOR WHICH DETAILS ARE SHOWN. 10. THE GARAGE SHALL CONTAIN NO OPENINGS INTO ROOMS USED FOR SLEEPING PURPOSES 11. EACH TOILET SHALL BE LOCATED IN A CLEAR SPACE NOT LESS THAN WP WIDE AND SHALL PAVE A CLEAR SPACE IN FRONT OF NOT LESS THAN 24' PER IRC 2003. iZ FIRE WARNING SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH IRC 2003. 13. ALL REQUIRED EXISTS SHALL BE OPEN ABLE FROM THE INSIDE WITHOUT THE USE OF A KEY OR ANY SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OR EFFORT. 14. OPENINGS EXTENDING VERTICALLY THROUGH FLOORS SHALL BE ENCLOSED IN A ONE HOUR FIRE RESISTIVE SHAFT COMPLYING WITH IRC 2003. 15. PROVIDE A MINIMUM 22' X W ATTIC ACCESS OPENING IN EACH ATTIC WHOSE MAXIMUM CLEAR HEIGHT EXCEEDS W. PROVIDE 3P MINIMUM HEADROOM ABOVE EACH SUCH OPENING PER IRC 2003. 15. ALL WEATHER EXPOSED SURFACES SHALL BE COVERED WITH GRACE -B' WATERPROOF BUILDING PAPER COMPLYING WITH IRC 2003 NO-17-1 OR TYPE 15 ASPHALT SATURATED ORGANIC FELT COMPLYING WITH IRC 2003. STANDARD NO. 32-1 AND SHALL BE INSTALLED PER IRC 2003. IT GAS VENTS AND NON COMBUSRBIE PIPING MUST BE EFFECTIVELY ORAFTSTOPPED AT EACH FLOOR AND COILING THROUGH WHICH IT PASSES. 18. GUARD RAILS WITHIN HOME SHALL BE AT LEAST 36' HIGH AND SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED SO THAT A 4'DIAMETER SPHERE CANNOT PASS THROUGH PER IRC 2003, (42' HIGH AT EXTERIOR GUARDRAILS) 19. HOSE BIBS AND IRRIGATION SYSTEMS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH APPROVED BACK FLOW PREVENTION DEVICES. 20. EXHAUST PANS AND DRYER VENTS MUST BE DUCTED TO OUTSIDE AIR AND BE EQUIPPED WITH APPROVED BACK-DRAFT DAMPERS. 21. ALL INSULATION SHALL WAVE A FLAME-SPREAD RATING NOT TO EXCEED 25 AND A SMOKE DENSITY NOT TO EXCEED 45O WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH U.B.C. STANDARD NO. 42-1. 22. HANDRAILS SHALL BE PLACED NOT LESS THAN 34.OR MORE THAN 38' PER, IRC 2003 1. ALL ESCAPE OR RESCUE WINDOWS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM NET CLEAR OPENABLE AREA OF 5.7 SQUARE FEET. THE MINIMUM NET CLEAR OPENABLE HEIGHT DIMENSION SHALL BE 24 INCHES. THE MINIMUM NET CLEAR OPERABLE WIDTH DIMENSION SHALL BE 20 INCHES. WHEN WINDOWS ARE PROVIDED AS A MEANS OF ESCAPE OR RESCUE. 2. ALL. REFERENCES TO THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE SHALL SE TO THE 2003 EDITION 3. PROVIDE A 2Y SLOPE AWAY FORM THE BUILDING FOR A MINIMUM OF FIVE. FEET 4. THERE SHALL BE NO ON-SITE WATER RETENTION. S. GRADE DIFFERENTIALS GREATER THAT 12 INCHES SHALL BE SUPPORTED BY AN APPROVED RETAINING WALL 6. LOW FLOWWATER CLOSETSTO BE INSTALLED(MAX. I.SGALLONS PER FLUSH). 7. PRIMARY HEATING SYSTEM FOR ADDITION SHALL BE FLOOR RADIATION. STRUCTURAL NOTES 1. ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING-1,580 PSF 2. CONCRETE TO OBTAIN A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 3,000 PSI AFTER 28 DAYS 3. REINFORCING STEEL -Ml57 GRADE BO. 4. DIMENSION LUMBER-HEM FIR Y2, ib-850 PSI CODE ANALYSIS ZONED R-1 LOT SIZE= 140'X 143.23' LOT AREA= 19977.9 SO FT FLOOR AREA TABULATION NEW CONSTRUCTION FLOOR AREA = 1292 SO FT. OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION: H-4 CONSTRUCTION TYPE V-N OCCUPANT LOAD: 5 (100 SF/PERSON) Lm.a I inns rauw ~eennxo _~L9.fYtl wn~ 2 3; raw xnaKs mns~r I I Inao~1 PLOT PLAN REVISIONS V O hW 0 EXHIBIT 2 JOB NO. OATS 4021/05 S-~ OFV ~~~nrmwuo , ~ W L9.1]IM spoon Frse,ffxr _ _ REVISIONS FLOOR PLAN AND ROOF FRAMING PLAN ~j 3-TAS SHINGLE I 0'-21' I I 12 HR 2-2x12 FRO 2-2x12 HR 2- 1 HRD 2-2x12 HRD - 12 4F-- y.a ROOF DL 10 PSF 12 CEWNG OIL IO PSF y~ ROOF LL 00 PSF WIND LOAD IGO MPH EXPOSUREC 20-it `1P TYPICAL TRUSS - SIDING PER O4 - CORNERS - ELEVATION SECTION-1 1 12 4F-- INERS CHOICE G Ea SIDE ELEVATION SECTION-2 EXHIBIT 3 S~ 114-=1'-0 - ~ATE 4121/05 S2 OF 3 1. There is an approximately 2 foot grade change along a retaining wall between the property in question and the property to the south, the property to the south existing approximately 2 feet above the applicant's property. The manner in which the height of the fence is measured pursuant to the Code of Laws (from finished grade 5 feet inside the property which it belongs) makes it problematic to have a true 6 foot privacy fence for the property owners on this portion of the lot. 2. The request will have a minimal effect on the essential character of the locality. An 8 foot fence at the proposed location will be less impactive than normal given the significant grade change between the two properties. 3. Six citizens offered to speak in approval of this variance. With the following conditions: 1. The fence height variance is approved for 110 feet along the south property line as specified by the applicant in Exhibit 1 and as modified by the Board. Construction of a fence within the minimum required front yard must adhere to applicable height standards including the method in which the fence height is measured. 2. The fence may stairstep down to 4 feet prior to the front yard setback requirement. The motion passed 7-0. Chair DRDA advised the applicant his request for variance was approved. - D. Case No. WA-05-06: An application filed by the Wheat Ridge Housing Authority for approval of a 5 foot side and 5 foot rear yard setback variance from the 10 foot side and 10 foot rear yard setback requirement for detached garages over 8 feet in height on property zoned Residential-Three (R-3) and located at 4501 Everett Street. This case was presented by Jeff Hirt. He entered all pertinent documents into the record and advised the Board there was jurisdiction to hear the case. He reviewed the staff report and digital presentation. Staff recommended approval of the application for reasons outlined in the staff report. Board Member HOWARD expressed concern that Jerry DiTullio, a member of City Council, was presenting this case. Mr. Hirt stated that Mr. DiTullio was presenting the case as Chair of the Wheat Ridge Housing Authority and staff had concluded there was no conflict in this regard. Board Member HOVLAND asked if the utility easement would be affected by the variance. Ms. Reckert explained that the easements are 5 feet wide and that is what the setback would be. Board of Adjustment 11 - 03-24-05 EXHIBIT 4 Jerry DiTullio 3250 Newland Street Mr. DiTullio was swom in by Chair DRDA. He clarified that he was appearing strictly as Chair of the Housing Authority and not as a member of City Council. In discussions with the Community Development Department he learned that four garages could be built on this property without a variance. Since this is an 8-plex, the Housing Authority would like to build 6 garages to get more cars off the street and promote sale of the units. It is planned to build storage units and patios for the units. Board Member BELL expressed concern about the lack of a play area for children. Mr. DiTullio replied that there is a park across the street where children can play. Board Member HOVLAND expressed concern about homeowners using the garages for storage rather than parking cars. Mr. DiTullio stated that once the units are sold, a homeowners association would address these types of matters. In response to a question from Board Member HOWARD, Mr. DiTullio stated the garages would be constructed with vinyl siding. Doug Knop 1260 Corona, Denver Mr. Knop is one of the Housing Authority's technical advisors with the Jefferson County Housing Authority. He stated there was no other suitable configuration for the garages. Six garages would allow for more offstreet parking and make the units more desirable. If the number were reduced to five garages it would only eliminate one setback problem. Space is needed for turnaround radius and to provide courtyard space. Larry Nelson 8534 West Swarthmore Place, Littleton Mr. Nelson was sworn in by Chair DRDA. He is with Cornerstone Realty, broker for the Housing Authority. He stated that this is the third Housing Authority project and he has found that garages and private spaces are very important to buyers. In previous projects, the units with garages were the first to sell. Seven of the units will have private courtyards if six garages are allowed and there would also be adequate turnaround for vehicles. Board Member ABBOTT commented that there are many private homeowners who have similar situations when wanting to build a garage and there doesn't seem to be a hardship issue here other than marketability. Mr. DiTullio replied that the variance would adjust to an area that is poorly planned and zoned and each Board of Adjustment case is considered on its own merits and does not set precedence. This is a unique situation in the area. The objective of the Housing Authority is to improve the area and provide affordable housing. Board of Adjustment - 12 - 03-24-05 Meredith Reckert commented that staff believes there are unique circumstances because half of the lot is taken up with front setbacks. Board Member BELL commented that the need for affordable housing in Wheat Ridge is overwhelming and garages are desirable amenities. Board Member HOVLAND agreed that providing affordable housing and improving the neighborhood are worthy goals, but it is important to adhere to all the variance criteria. Board Member DRDA stated that he was having difficulty in finding a hardship in this case. Meredith Reckert commented that a unique circumstance is also presented by an attempt to improve a nonconforming property. Board Member BYBEE expressed concern that a 10 foot setback may be more conducive to collecting junk. Board Member BELL commented that she believed a hardship exists because of the lot configuration and the great need for affordable housing. This is the kind of situation that needs to be addressed when revising the Comprehensive Plan. Upon a motion by Board Member ABBOTT and second by Board Member BYBEE the following resolution was stated: Whereas, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and Whereas, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-05-06 is an appeal to this Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and Whereas, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law, and in recognition that there were no protests registered against it; and Whereas, the relief applied for be granted without detriment to the public welfare and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge. Now, therefore, be it resolved that Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA- 05-06 be, and hereby is, approved. Type of Variance: A 5 foot side and 5 foot rear yard setback variance from the 10 foot side yard and 10 foot rear yard setback requirement for detached garages over 8 feet in height on property zoned Residential-Three (R-3) and located at 4501 Everett Street. Board of Adjustment - 13 - 03-24-05 For the following reasons: 1. The applicant has very limited options for placement of a garage to accommodate an 8-unit multi-family structure without the need for a variance or variances. 2. Approval of the variance would hopefully provide an incentive to make improvements to a dilapidated property and perhaps be influential to adjacent properties to do or request the same. 3. The intent of the property being owned by the Wheat Ridge Housing Authority is to provide a public service therefore resulting in a benefit to the community. 4. The adjacent property to the north is also zoned multi-family. 5. The corner lot placement of this apartment building places the building with a significant double front yard setback therefore limiting available space in the rear. 6. The 10 foot required setbacks do not seem to provide a definable benefit to this neighborhood as compared to a less dense location. With the following conditions: 1. If it is determined that any portion of this structure is within the 100-year floodplain, a Class I floodplain exception will be required prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. The structure shall not have an exterior with visible metal materials. Chair DRDA reminded everyone present that a super majority vote of 6 affirmative votes was necessary to approve the application. The motion failed 5-2 with Board members DRDA and HOWARD voting no. Chair DRDA advised the applicant the request for variance was denied. 5. CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING 6. OLD BUSINESS There was no old business to come before the Board. 7. NEW BUSINESS A. Approval of minutes -January 27, 2005 Board of Adjustment - 14 - 03-24-05 EXHIBIT 5 a 0 oz ~ b r a m 0 c z 0 EVERETT STREET (50" R.O.W.) 0 z = Malkil w], P~ 9L 'o nr L ~ J r i EXHIBIT 7 x H OH_°Q N< w} IN-p C z~ zo 04 W O /~/~~I C~ W C N N W = Z LL K } H H 1+1 O Z W °J W~ Z ~ Q C~ F e y a d x O w C y ~ w Y w O w O o w o a w o ° w z 3 U cv z~ a i ° ~ FC Q O O oN O~~ S c J O H ~e N N N Q C w W 4 ~0 Con ~y W ~ z ° t` f-~, as.a w t- o N w > > m N ° N N N Q oQ ` z =_°zw r+t v1H WW .Wn N N :=0Oi- - w IN O ~E NwOW R Z WC U Q V 6 Z tZ''_..O W> } G~ N1-Z 2 O U d-~ NO G C H ~ VI C V O 6 Q I N I--+Ki H O °m~ ~`C., F°~•` NLJZ ° lx o xw°~N~k'~ Con w w BOO Co° >WQ o F}FJQZ~z LLJ w U O Z C W W °W ON C N J G _ UZ N O N 1- ~ 6 w N N ~ Q U C Lil Q O W OJ Z W O Z V K O° ° 6 Z O W~ O ZO W C H O O ~ I C J ~ C~~ } z w waU ,o~w o<~ ~ o a~ o~° _~~¢x V nW~ H7 O~Q Nd SZti 2OW ~ Z U O~ ~ °W ~ ~m~ ~5 Z? Z H FC O I- Z C W 6 F- Q Li } O O Z O C `5 O Z° O O 1~ W Z Y F ° U O V! Q O m C/f m N Z C~ Z w Z°~ Z O w W ° J N ~ N F~ W Y O y 0 O, N O NO V Q°~ ° G O° V V d ~ Z S Q~ C° J~ Q c~ ~ ti O V U Z Q N N Z p < W W~~ zcFiw ~ ~}wo zc~~ F LLo w o loc } o o?¢co3m~~ ^,~H,~//`jJZ O OOIi N dNNU ~ y\T ~ OU ~ ~ C ~CZ [=n QwZQNWyZjW° ~--~I /ti a_ 3C0 wO J ~6 p°10- K V' W O }N °}NZ ° _ d W O E ~ C C Z } W~ C d U C Z ° F~ ~ W I- N 1- d J °W N O Z O w Z Z O O W u O 1~`~l//l ~O\ N O O N Z 6 O N Q U O Q ° W O ° O 2 V N U' ~il Z 6 Z F- 6 C Z a IAN V ° O' V _~O ° V KO W U!- ' } O O ~ Vi Z ~ N M O' C 6 4 m V ° V C NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT on May 26, 2005, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building at 7500 West 29 h Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. The following petition shall be heard: Case No. WA-05-08: An application filed by Brothers Fence Company for approval of a variance to the 6 foot maximum fence height standard under Section 26-603 resulting in an 8 foot high fence for property zoned Commercial-One (C-1) and located at 9505 West 44th Avenue. Case No. WA-05-09: An application filed by the Wheat Ridge Housing Authority for approval of a 5 foot side yard setback variance from the 10 foot side setback requirement for detached garages over 8 feet in height on property zoned Residential-Three (R-3) and located at 4501 Everett Street. Case No. WA-05-10: An application filed by Holiday Inn Express Hotel & Suites for approval a variance of 10 feet from the required 30 foot setback from the right-of-way for signs over 25 feet high resulting in a 20 foot setback from the right-of-way for property zoned Commercial-One (C-1) and located at 10101 West I-70 Frontage Road South. Case No. WA-05-11: An application filed by Wheat Ridge Cyclery for approval of a variance to the required landscaping under Section 26-502 AND a variance to the required parking under Section 26-501 for property zoned Commercial-One (C-1) and located at 7051 West 38th Avenue, 7065 West 38th Avenue, 7085 West 38th Avenue and 3830 High Court. Kathy Field, Administrative Assistant ATTEST: Pamela Y. Anderson, City Clerk To be published: Wheat Ridge Transcript Date: May 12, 2005 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) s~ Owner :Kunz Lee R Jr Et Al Parcel :043085 Site :8995 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfereri 9 13 0001 6401 2844 \~l .10 Mail :4096 Youngfield St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 7004 2890 0. Use :3112 Ind,Improved Land rnone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm:3 YB:1985 Pool: B1dgSF:18,106 Ac:3.26 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Gustafson Jerry T Parcel :043142 U/UGLF}IVN~ Site :4543 Everett St Wheat Ridge 80033 xfarcrl •na its/i aszv Mail :7659 Youngfield St Arvada Cc 80005 7004 2890 0001 6401 2851 Use :5112 Res,Apartments,Improved Land rnone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm:l YB:1961 Pool: B1dgSF:2,880 Ac:.32 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Lawson Robert E Parcel :043221 Site :4540 Everett Ct Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :10/05/1990 Mail :7467 w 75th Ave Arvada Co 80003 7004 2890 0001 6401 2868 Use :5112 Res,Apartments, Improved Land Bedrm: Bath: TotRm:l YB:1962 Pool: B1dgSF:3,764 Ac:.28 * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Owens Robert T Parcel :043258 Site :4553 Everett St Wheat Ridge 80033 7004 2890 0001 6401 2875 Mail :2460 W Long Cir Littleton Co 80120 Use :5112 Res,Apartments,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm:l YB:1961 Pool: B1dgSF:2,880 Ac:.32 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) ' Owner :Stoltzfus Vernon Y Parcel :043265 Site :4500 Everett Ct Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :11/27/1995 Mail :14382 W 48th P1 Golden Co 80403 7004 2890 0001 6401 2882 Use :5112 Res,Apartments,Improved Land Bedrm: Bath: TotRm:l YB:1962 Pool: B1dgSF:7,750 Ac:.36 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Wheat Ridge Housing Authority Parcel :043266 Site :4501 Everett St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :11/23/2004 Mail :7500 W 29t -WnFeat R d4e Cc 80033 Price :$545,000 U•se :51R~s Apar nts, Improved Land Phone Bedrm: Bath: tRm:l YB:1962 Pool: B1dgSF:7,456 Ac*.45 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Hunt Roy Andrew Parcel :043308 Site :4510 Everett Ct Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered 071~111g4ti Mail :6023 Uno St Arvada Co 80003 7004 2890 0001 6401 2899 Use :5112 Res,Apartments,Improved Land rnone Bedrm: Bath: TOtRm:l YB:1961 Pool: BidgSF:4,754 Ac:.33 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :City O£ heat Ridge Parcel :188102 Site :*no Site ddress* Xfered :12/01/1985 Mail :7500 W 29th-,.Ave Wheat,--~Rridge Cc 80033 Price Use :9149 Exempt, Po '-ti.cal Sub,Land Phone Bedrm: Bad tRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF: Ac:.84 Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 303/235-2846 Fax: 303/235-2857 The City of Wheat Ridge May 12, 2005 Dear Property Owner: This is to inform you of Case No. WA-05-09 which is a request for approval of a 5 foot side yard setback variance from the 10 foot side setback requirement for detached garages over 8 feet in height on property zoned Residential-Three (R-3) and located at 4501 Everett Street. This case will heard by the Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue on May 26, 2005, at 7:30 p.m. As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at 303-235-2846. Thank you. Planning Division. \\srv-6-eng-001 \users\kfield\Kathy\B 0A\pubnotice\2005\wa0509.wpd ,S/ 7f e _ `150 / 6 ve r e4--- -Sf 5E 15 's SE 22 OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WHEAT RIDGE COLORADO PARCEULOT BOUNDARY (DESIGNATES OWNERSHIP) NE 22 WATER FEATURE * DENOTES MULTIPLE ADDRESSES 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN (APPROXIMATE LOCATION) O IGO XX0 500 9000 feet r DEPARTMENT OF MAP ADOPTED: June 15, 1994 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Last Revision: September 10, 2001 Lee Kunz Jr. & Barber Develo Kunz Jerry Gustafson & Pamela Gustafson Robert Lawson & Carolyn Lawson 4096 Youngfield St 7659 Youngfield St 7467 W 75th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Arvada, CO 80005 Arvada, CO 80003 Robert Owens & Debbra Owens 2460 W Long Cir Littleton, CO 80120 Vernon Stoltzfus & Carla Stoltzfus 14382 W 48th PI Golden, CO 80403 Ridge Housing Authority Wheat 7500 W 29th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Roy Andrew Hunt 6023 Uno St Arvada, CO 80003 City Of Wheat Ridge 7500 W 29th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 * Search Parameters * Jefferson (CO) * 5/12/2005 * 8:08 AM Parcel Number ...8 39 221 00 009 39 221 06 029 39 221 13 005 39 221 13 006 39 221 13 007 39 221 13 008 39 221 13 009 39 221 13 010 LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION Community Development Department 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Phone (303) 235-2846 (Please print or type all information) Applicant Wheat Ridge Housing Auth. Address 7500 W. 29th Avenue Phone 303-235-2846 City Wheat Ridge State Colorado Zip 80033 Fax Owner Wheat P_i,dge Housing Auth. Address 7500 W. 29th Avenue Phone 303-235-2846 City Wheat Ridge State Colorado Zip 80033 Fax Jerry DiTull'0 Contact Henry Wehrdt~agent for WRHA)Address 7500 W. 7490 W. 29th Avenue 45th Avenue 303-235-284( Phone 303-422-8600 City Wheat Ridge State C olorado Zip 80033 Fax 303-422-3229 (The person listed as contact will be contacted to answer questions regarding this application, provide additional information when necessary, post public hearing signs, will receive a copy of the staff report prior to Public Hearing, and shall be responsible for forwarding all verbal and written communication to applicant and owner.) Location of request (address): 4501 Everett Street Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request): Application submittal requirements on reverse side ❑ Change of zone or zone conditions ❑ Special Use Permit ❑ Consolidation Plat ❑ Subdivision: Minor (5 lots or less) ❑ Flood Plain Special Exception ❑ Subdivision: Major (More than 5 lots) ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Right of Way Vacation ❑ Planned Building Group ❑ Temporary Use, Building, Sign ❑ Site Development Plan approval 68 Variance/Waiver (from Section ) ❑ Other: Detailed description of request: "",Setback to north property line. (side yard) Required information: Assessors Parcel Number: Size of Lot (acres or square footage): Current Zoning: R-3 Proposed Zoni Current Use: Proposed Use: I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above, without whose consent the requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners must submit power-of-attorney ft m the owner which approved of this action on his behalf. Signature of Applicant w Subscribed, d sworn tome this ajp day of 2005 P..t l7YY Otir~yt~'a~ Nota Pub c My commission expires ~ c) 3. 06 To be filled out by staff: Datereceived Comp Plan Desig. Related Case No. - Fee $ Receipt No. - Zoning Pre-App Mtg. Date Case No. K/4--0-! -U 9 Quarter Section Map Case Manager f~i'"T Case No.: App: Last Name: App: First Name: Owner: Last Name: Owner: First Name: App Address: City, State Zip: App: Phone: Owner Address: City/State/Zip: Owner Phone: Project Address: Street Name: City/State, Zip: Case Disposition: Project Planner: File Location: Notes: Follow-Up: A0509 Quarter Section Map No.: NE22-. i Related Cases: A0506 /o Henry. Wehrdt _ LL Case History: ft side yard setback... RHA 500 W_ 29th Ave Review Body: BOA 5/26/05.._ heat Ritlge, CO 80033 j 03 APN: 9227-13-008 ame 2nd Review Body: 2nd Review Date: I- _ Decision-making Body: BOA: 5/26105 ...507 Approval/Denial Date: , Everett Street - - heat Ridge, CO 80033 Reso/Ordinance No.: Conditions of Approval: 11 i District: IV__.. Hirt _ cove ' Date Received: /29/2005_, - ~ Pre-App Date: '