HomeMy WebLinkAboutWA-05-147500 West 29th Avenue The City of
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Meat
Telephone 303/235-2846 Ridge
FAX 303/235-2857
August 12, 2005
James Pryor
2750 S. Wadsworth Blvd., C-200
Denver, CO 80227
Dear Mr. Pryor:
RE: Case No. WA-05-14
Please be advised that at its meeting on July 28, 2005, the Board of Adjustment DENIED your request
for a variance from the required 30 foot front yard setback resulting in a 21 foot front yard setback for
property zoned Residential-One C and located at 5725 West 37th Avenue.
Enclosed is a copy of the Certificate of Resolution, as well as a draft copy of the minutes, stating the
Board's decision. Should you decide to appeal the decision of the Board, you will need to notify the
Jefferson County district court in writing within 30 days of the Board's decision.
Please feel free to contact me at (303) 235-2846 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Kathy Fiel
Administrative Assistant
Enclosures: Certificate of Resolution
Draft of Minutes
cc: Edward Kaufman
13490 Lafayette Ct.
Thornton, CO 80241
WA-OS=14 (case file)
Building File
COF
CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTION
1, Ann Lazzeri, Secretary to the City of Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment, do hereby certify that
the following Resolution was duly adopted in the City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson,
State of Colorado, on the 28th day of July. 2005.
CASE NO: WA-05-14
APPLICANT'S NAME: James Pryor
LOCATION: 5725 West 37`b Avenue
WHEREAS, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and
WHEREAS, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-05-14 is an appeal to this Board
from the decision of an administrative officer; and
WHEREAS, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law, and in recognition
that there WERE NO protests registered against it; and
WHEREAS, the relief applied for MAY be granted without detriment to the public welfare and
without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing the City of
Wheat Ridge.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Board of Adjustment Application Case No.
WA-05-14 be, and hereby is, APPROVED.
TYPE OF VARIANCE: A 9 foot variance from the required 30 foot front yard setback
resulting in a 21 foot front yard setback for property zoned Residential One C.
FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
1. The character of the neighborhood would not change substantially as it is a relatively
dense area with small setbacks.
2. The garage, as required for access to 37"' Avenue, creates a unique situation in that the
depth does not fit without necessitating a variance. With access into the cul-de-sac or
lane, this would not have been an issue.
VOTE: YES: ABBOTT, BLAIR, HOVLAND, PAGE
NO: DRDA, HOWARD
ABSENT: BELL, BYBEE
Board of Adjustment
Resolution WA-05-14
Page two (2)
DISPOSITION: DENIED, based on Chapter 2, Article 3, Section 2-53(d) of the City of Wheat
Ridge Codes of Law which state that Board of Adjustment motions not carried are thereby
deemed denied.
ADOPTED and made effective this 28th day of July. 2005.
rda, Ch lr
Board of Adjustment
Ann Lazzeri, Secretary
Board of Adjustment
In response to a question from Board Member ABBOTT, Mr. Krizek stated that
the garage door on the new garage would be a raised panel steel door with
windows in the top row. He also stated that removal of the present garage door
would cause the space to be considered inhabited space which would increase the
assessment value of the building.
Board Members ABBOTT and BLAIR agreed to remove the second
condition.
The motion as amended by Board Members ABBOTT and BLAIR passed 5-
1 with Board Member DRDA voting no.
Chair DRDA advised the applicant that the request for variance was granted.
B. Case No. WA-05-14: An application filed by James Pryor for approval of a
variance from the required 30 foot front yard setback resulting in a 21 foot front
'IF yard setback for property zoned Residential-One C and located at 5725 West 37`s
Avenue.
This case was presented by Jeff Hirt. He entered all pertinent documents into the record
and advised the Board there was jurisdiction to hear the case. He reviewed the staff
report and digital presentation. Staff recommended denial of the application for reasons
outlined in the staff report.
Mr. Hirt explained that the house could not be placed any further to the north because of
a 10-foot utility and drainage easement.
r.
Edward Kaufman
13490 Lafayette Ct., Thornton
Mr. Kaufman was sworn in by Chair DRDA. He is the developer of the property as well
as a lot owner. He was representing James Pryor who is a partner in the LLC who owns
the development. The property, when developed, will have five single family ranch style
houses; however, under city code, only four driveways are allowed from the private
drive. The driveway for the fifth house must enter from 37o Avenue requiring a 30 foot
setback from the street to the garage. This would not allow for a garage adequate for
storage and handicapped accessibility. The houses will not have basements. A 3 foot
administrative variance was granted; however, another 6 feet is needed to construct the
desired 24' x 26' garage. The houses are pre-manufactured and cannot be changed at this
time. He did not realize at the time the houses were ordered that a fifth driveway could
not be built off the private drive. The garages will be built after the houses are in place.
Meredith Reckert commented that the 10-foot easement on the north could be researched
to find out whether or not 5 feet could be vacated thereby reducing the amount of
variance required by the applicant. Mr. Kaufman stated that he could not afford to wait
Board of Adjustment - 5 -
07-28-05
until the Board meets in another month to find the outcome of the easement issue and
requested that a decision be made by the Board tonight.
Upon a motion by Board Member HOVLAND and second by Board Member
ABBOTT the following resolution was stated:
Whereas, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and
Whereas, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-05-14 is an appeal to this
Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and
Whereas, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law, and in
recognition that there were no protests registered against it; and
Whereas, the relief applied for may be granted without detriment to the public
welfare and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the
regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge.
Now, therefore, be it resolved that Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-
05-14 be, and hereby is, approved.
Type of Variance: A 9 foot variance from the required 30 foot front yard setback
resulting in a 21 foot front yard setback for property zoned Residential-One C.
For the following reasons: pi xFI
1. The character of the neighborhood wchange substantially as it is a
relatively dense area with small setbacks.
2. The garage, as required for access to 37's Avenue, creates a unique situation
in that the depth does not fit without necessitating a variance. With access
into the cul-de-sac or lane, this would not have been an issue.
Board Member BLAIR stated that he would support the motion for the reasons stated,
especially since there would have been no problem if access for the fifth house would
have been allowed from the private lane.
Board Member ABBOTT stated that the area has many substandard situations and the
proposed subdivision would be an improvement to the neighborhood. Further, the
setback would have no distinguishable detriment to the neighborhood.
The motion failed by a vote of 4-2 with Board Members HOWARD and DRDA
voting no.
Chair DRDA advised the applicant his request for variance had been denied.
Board of Adjustment 6
07-28-05
0
e
BZ Development LLC
Real Estate Development - Marketing
Edward J. Kaufman
13490 Lafayette Court
Thornton, Colorado 80241
By Letter and FAX
August 10th, 2005
303 255-9307
Fax 303 255-9397
bzdevna,vahoo.com
Ref: Riley's Roost and Board of Adjustment
City of Wheat Ridge
Alan White, Director of Community Development
7500 29th Avenue
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033
Dear Alan,
This past month I went before the Board of Adjustment, BOA, to request of
review of the decision determined by Planning and Zoning denying my
application for a variance of six feet to allow for construction of a garage that
would allow for a vehicle of standard size, and with luck, a vehicle that
accommodates handicapped drivers. When the vote was taken, 1 was denied
any consideration.
That being said, 1 wanted to make you aware that the Planning and Zoning
Department, P and Z, from the front desk to Meredith Reckert, have been
extremely helpful in every phase of my development. They have given
appropriate advice and guidance every step of the entitlement process and
brought me back on track when I steered off course. When rendered a decision,
even though one may not agree, they have justification and alternative solutions.
They are short on personnel and long on commitment.
A brief history:
I applied for and received an administrative variance of three feet.
With a 30 foot set back from the southern boundary and a three foot
administrative variance, I still found myself six feet short.
I made application for a review with the BOA and had a hearing the 28th of
July.
After receiving a majority of votes, four for and two against, I was denied
the additional six feet.
I called your office for clarification of what 1 considered an unusual vote
count having a majority of votes and still not be considered the recipient of
an affirmative vote. At your suggestion, I write a letter to your office
stating my concerns.
As a comparative background for your review, I want to relate the only other case
on the agenda that evening.
An individual wanted to build a two-car garage on their property, which
already had a one car attached garage. They desired to build an
additional two-car garage in their back yard. The two issues were, did the
neighbors object and did it meet code requirements. The neighbors did
not object, but the set backs were not to code as I understood the
testimony.
They needed the additional garage, as the husband was taking up
woodworking as a hobby and needed the space in their current garage.
The two car garage would be five feet from the adjacent property lines.
There were no special needs to accommodate, just a hobby.
After an hour and one half, the BOA approved the denial that was issued
by P and Z unanimously.
It was my turn to present my case.
Like the first applicant, I too was denied by P and Z in their initial
recommendation to the BOA.
I needed a six foot variance to make a garage practical in size as the
current situation did not.
After posting the required public notification, there was not one objection.
explained that the variance would allow for handicapped vehicle parking
as well as allow for an individual to walk around a car of normal size, while
it was parked in the garage.
The 30' setback on a southern boundary was a serious obstacle, as in this
particular case, it required an access of a 37th, as I could not have an
access of my private drive because per code, one cannot have more than
four accesses of a private drive, I have five homes on a cul-de-sac. As I
understand, there cannot be parking on the private cul-de-sac for the
reasons of fire and safety. The City of Wheat Ridge allowed a Final Plat
to be approved, knowing the existing codes would inhibit parking with
these small building envelops.
I cannot park on the street nor can I park in the garage. I felt that this
amounted to a serious impediment to the development.
My homes were built with extra wide interior doors to accommodate wheel
chair bound individuals with garages designed to allow access for special
needs.
I have built three and will be constructing five more housing units in the
City of Wheat Ridge. These homes were designed to be owner occupied
and not rentals. Having constructed or in the process of building 1.5MM
dollars worth of homes, using local labor when appropriate, I feel my
request was unfairly denied. Not one person would be negatively
impacted by granting me six extra feet for a suitable garage.
After pleading my case, I was told that the BOA wanted to take this under
advisement and render their decision next month. I told the Board that it
that the facts were very clear. My request did not affect my neighbors,
there were no objections, it took cars off the street for parking, there would
be a twenty foot set back instead of thirty. I am surrounded on three sides
by over 50+ rental units. I have brought improvements to the property and
tax revenue the City of Wheat Ridge.
The BOA said they would vote immediately if I so desired. I requested a
vote. I thought I had won when the votes were counted. There were four
in favor of granting the variance and two against. I lost. I felt I was in
Wonderland where up was down and down was up. A majority vote
meant that if one had the majority, as I did, I won. No so in Wheat Ridge.
While I was in the building on the night of the 28th, I noticed a placard on an easel
that stated the following, (I am paraphrasing)
Wheat Ridge has more rentals than home owners.
Wheat Ridge has a declining population.
Wheat Ridge has a rising crime rate.
This placard, as I later informed, were some of the negatives that the City was
facing as determined by a consultant hired by the City. Going into meeting I felt
the BOA was responsible for the placard. I now know it wasn't, but facts
surrounding state of Wheat Ridge as determined by consultants.
When my partner and I targeted Wheat Ridge to build in, we were aware of the
above. We found a receptive P and Z department eager to assist. We built safe
and attractive units and built homes where a vacant lot stood for years. We are
doing the same on our project on Eaton.
The BOA has the power of arbitrary decision making. I left that meeting feeling
that I now know why developers are reluctant to make commitments to building
with hundreds of thousands of dollars at stake and why they cannot even win
their case when a simple vote of four members were for the amendment and two
against.
You explained the "Super Majority Vote System" in Wheat Ridge. In thirty years
of development I have never heard of this Orwellian mentality of vote tabulation.
Apparently, it was put forth as a great idea and it was put into place. You may
want to rethink this voting system.
I currently have another infill lot identified and was prepared to go under contract.
Between the fees required to build in Wheat Ridge and mentality of the BOA, we
are reconsidering if we want to get caught up in a system that is
incomprehensible.
After listening to the comments and questions of the BOA, it my opinion that they
are out of touch with the reality. They seem to be unaware of the current
economic status of the City as well as the other items printed on the placard in
the lobby. The BOA have shown they are not concerned with the needs of
developers who make serious investments in this community. Wheat Ridge
needs quality homes built and a place for new residents that add to the tax base.
We want to continue building, but the BOA, in their collective wisdom have found
a way to impede development.
If you can share this letter with the individuals listed in my "CC", I would be
greatly appreciative.
Sincerely.
C/ dwar
CC: Mayor Gretchen Cerveny
Planning and Zoning Director, Meredith Reckert
Councilpersons: Jerry Ditullio, Karen Berry
N
ao
0
0
N
W
J
C
O
V1
O
M7
70
MMI
70
CD
rot-
O
Q.
rli
CD.
N
O
(D
~LO
7v ~
W. O
CD. <
(D (D
r r pp
aj
rn~
O :3
(D
N CQ
CD
ai
mn
CD
A
rot-
n
CD -0
'0
n O
O
M, -h
Ln
n O
w o
mn O
3
rn ~
o
~
~
O
r
o
3
cn
Q
,
CD
~
0
c
rnO
P7'
•
x
W
O
O
O
rn
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
r+
r~
O
01
o
n
v
00
•
/o
IrD
A~
i
y
0
N
d
C
O
z
I~
i~
i~
Tw~
w
IrD
K
Mood
b
O
O
N
O
~Q
1 r
7~6
l ~
~cr
G
m
cf)
w
S
m
z
C
m
p
- -
J I_SO'00 Ox3 u
N ~D
1 r
zoo' ,
m
w ~
r ~
w~
a~
n
JJ/ z
-
urlurr a DaAINAGE
100.00'
S0'00'03
"W s
EASEMENT
-
-
30.35'
3
n.-_
1
44.00
t.1 U..I Spue Au'w !i
10.00'
o
it
.OOZI io
t v
~1
B1 CCtmaaw of
y
N 1
i
"
IA 1
A
D
C
LOT
5725 WEST
8
37TH AVE
~N
n n
1
1 .ooz1 J', 5
°
V
i
m
m
fi
_
_ 700.00'
N
S0-00.0
3"W
.
PRIVATE DRIVE (TRACT B)
SO.00'03"W I Ivu.w
r - -
I
i 48.00 -.1-0
L
N
s~
m
sl t. I~
rm
fD
101
P
O-W
b
O
O
m
A~
VW
0~
lot
m
O
r
0
v.
n
b
O
►'C
r
0
0
x
0
cam.
n
b
O
r
O
O
~Q
O
cam.
n
b
O
CD
r
0
0
n
O
r
0
0
x
0
C1
(11
~
W
N
~
01
n
O
►r
C
7Q
A~
(TQ
J
a
p
A~
`C
S
A~
rD
rD
0~.
O
fD
C
'
A~
CD
•.D
¢
~
eD
m
n
M
O
ft
0
O
O
J
CD
n
CD
eD
~
7
M
~
UQ
fD
t
~C
•.7
¢
n'
❑
C
UA
v
eD
ft
C
ry
n
n
J
eD
eD
m
C
~
v'
CD
A~
C
0~
M~+
r)
01
OEW 0
emt-
1~ •
~J
-P W N ~
Q, p y CD F O CD
CD (-D CD C-D CD
O CL U'
CD
bq Cp C CD
CD ( CD CD
' p ~C CD
~ ~ ~ CD ice'
CD
~ p O
A BCD BCD
CD ° u CD
CD p o
CD 0 d o CD U
CD
CD CD
~C (N
CD p O O CCDD
A~
5'
PUBLIC HEARING ROSTER
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
July 28, 2005
Case No. WA-05-14: An application filed by James Pryor for approval of a variance from
the required 30 foot front yard setback resulting in a 21 foot front yard setback for
property zoned Residential-One C (RAC) and located at 5725 West 37th Avenue
Name j~ Address In favor/Opposed
POSTING CERTIFICATION
CASE NO. I JA-05-14-
PLANNING COMMISSION / CITY COUNCIL / BO OF ADJUSTMENT ( ' cle One)
HEARING DATE: 7 2, Lo S-
I,
276 &-,ik -'2b
residing at
as the applicant for Case No. VV-4 - 0
Public Hearing at (A/ 4
4 hereby certify that I have posted the Notice of
(locat`ion)
P
on this day of 206~_-:and do hereby certify that
said sign has been posted and remained in place for fifteen (15) days prior to and including the
scheduled day of public hearing of this case. The sign was posted in the position shown on the
map below.
Signature
NOTE: This form must be submitted at the public hearing on this an wil placed in the
applicant's case file at the Community Development Department.
e:lplanning\forms\postlngcert
Rev. U7103
MAP
wHEary6 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
m PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT
00[ORPOO
TO:
Board of Adjustment CASE MANAGER: Jeff Hirt
CASE NO. & NAME:
WA-05-14/James Pryor DATE OF MEETING: July 28, 2005
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approval of a variance from the required 30 foot front yard setback resulting in
a 21 foot front yard setback for property zoned Residential-One C (R-1C) and
located at 5725 West 37t' Avenue.
LOCATION OF REQUEST:
5725 West 37t' Avenue
APPLICANT (S):
James Pryor
OWNER (S):
James Pryor
APPROXIMATE AREA:
5,085 square feet (.12 acres)
PRESENT ZONING: Residential-One C (R-1C)
ENTER INTO RECORD:
e
(X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS
(X) ZONING ORDINANCE
Location Map
Subject Para
(X) DIGITAL PRESENTATION
Board of Adjustment I
Case WA-05-14/James Pryor
Jurisdiction
All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case.
L REQUEST
The property in question is located at 5725 West 37'" Avenue. The property has Residential-One C (R-1C)
zoning.
The applicant, James Pryor, is requesting this variance as the property owner. The request is for approval of a
variance from the required 30 foot front yard setback resulting in a 21 foot front yard setback for the purpose of
constructing an attached garage (Exhibit 1, Letter of Request). Attached garages are subject to a 30 foot front
yard setback on R-1C zoned property.
The property has unusual circumstances relative to the setback requirements. The property has frontage on both
a public street (37th Avenue to the south) and a private drive (to the east) (Exhibit 2, Site Plan). Per the Code of
Laws Sec. 26-123 (Definitions) the front lot line is considered the common boundary line between an interior
lot and a street. The front lot line is therefore considered the south lot line, facing 37'" Avenue, making the 30
foot setback required from the south lot line.
The applicant/property owner proposes to construct a single family residence with an attached garage, with the
overall structure being a total of 1,959 square feet in size. The attached garage portion of the structure is
proposed to be approximately 624 square feet in size (24' X 26'). The proposed structure will be located 21
feet from the front property line on the south, making approval of a variance required to allow for the structure
in this location.
The property will have vehicular access off of 37"Avenue, as required by the subdivision plat (Exhibit 3,
Subdivision Plat Approved by City Council September 2002). Per Sec. 26-609, for residential uses, no more
than 4 dwelling units may use the same private roadway. The R-1C zone district only allows single family
dwellings. There are 5 buildable lots directly adjacent to this private drive, so given this requirement in the
Code of Laws it was specified on the plat that the subject property have access off of 37`h Avenue and not off of
the private drive. As a result, there are only 4 lots with direct vehicular access off of the private drive to meet
this requirement in the Code of Laws. The side yard setback (eastern setback) required adjacent to the private
drive is 5 feet."
Staff prefers at least 18 feet of driveway length to accommodate vehicles parked in the driveway. This is the
required minimum length of a parking space for a standard, 90 degree parking configuration. The 21 foot
driveway depth proposed therefore is sufficient for this purpose.
It is important to note that the applicant requested an administrative variance to the required front yard setback
that was approved on March 23, 2005 (Exhibit 4, Administrative Variance Memo). That request was for
approval of a variance of 3 feet from the required 30 foot front yard setback resulting in a 27 foot front yard
setback from 37th Avenue. Per Sec. 26-115 (C) of the Code of Laws, the Zoning Administrator is empowered to
decide upon applications for a minor variance or waiver (10 percent or less) from the standard if certain
conditions are met.
The applicant expressed in the above mentioned letter of request that this variance being requested to the Board
of Adjustment is necessary because the home was manufactured off site and the design was altered. In other
words, the home was manufactured with a larger layout than what was previously understood at the time of the
administrative variance request.
Board or Adjustment Z
Case WA-05-14/James Pryor
Alternate placement of the garage to meet setback requirements, given the dimensions proposed, appears to be
problematic given setback requirements and easements in place. The applicant cannot move the house further
to the north, as it would then be in the required 10 foot utility and drainage easement shown on the subdivision
plat. The only option appears to be to make the garage more narrow, however there may not be enough room
for a two car garage if this was the case.
There appears to be some encroachments into required setbacks in the vicinity, but staff has not found evidence
of any variance cases in the vicinity of the subject property.
All other development standards have been met with this request.
II. SITE PLAN
The property is approximately 5,085 square feet, or .12 acres. The property measures 50.85 feet wide with a
depth of 100 feet.
The lot is part of the Riley's Roost Subdivision, approved in September of 2002. The lot is currently vacant.
The house is proposed to be facing east, towards the private drive. However, the access must be off of 37`s
Avenue because of a condition on the subdivision plat and a requirement in the Code of Laws for no more than
4 dwelling units to have access off of a private drive.
The area surrounding the property consists of residentially zoned and used property. To the west, south and
northeast, there are existing multi-family structures. There are also some single family residential properties in
the vicinity.
II. VARIANCE CRITERIA
Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a variance request:
1. Can the property in question yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be
used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located?
If the request is denied, the property may still receive a reasonable return in use. The property may still be
used as a single-family residence without the need for any variances.
2. If the variance were granted, would it alter the essential character of the locality?
The request will not have an effect on the essential character of the locality. There appear to be existing
non-conformities in the vicinity relative to setback requirements, although staff has not found any
comparable variance cases in the immediate vicinity. While the Code of Laws requires the front property
line to be considered the south property line, this portion of the lot essentially functions as a side yard
given the configuration of the lot and the proposed configuration of the house facing east.
3. Does the particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property
involved result in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere
inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out?
There are no unique conditions related to shape or topography that render any portion of the property in
question unbuildable. The property in question is square in shape and flat, with no vegetation as the site
has been cleared for development.
4. Has the alleged difficulty or hardship been created by any person presently having an interest in the
property?
Board of Adjustment
Case WA•05.141James Pryor
The applicant has created his own hardship by requesting a garage in this location. However, there are
limited options on the property for placement of a two car garage.
5. Would the granting of the variance be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other
property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located, by, among other
things, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, substantially increasing
the congestion in public streets or increasing the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or
substantially diminishing or impairing property values within the neighborhood?
Approval of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in
the area. There may be a slight decrease in the supply of light and air to the property to the west, given
that approval of the variance would result in a structure closer to the property line than is allowed under
current development standards. The request would not substantially increase the congestion in public
streets, increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety. Property values of the property in
question and adjacent properties should not be affected by this request.
6. If criteria 1 through 5 are found, then, would the granting of the variance result in a benefit or
contribution to the neighborhood or the community, as distinguished from an individual benefit on
the part of the applicant, or would granting of the variance result in a reasonable accommodation
of a person with disabilities?
The request will not result in a substantial benefit or contribution to the neighborhood or community
distinguished from an individual benefit on the part of the applicant. Approval of the request may result
in one less car parked in the driveway or the street however.
The request would not result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities.
III. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Upon review of the above request, staff concludes that the above criteria are not supportive of the variance
request. Staff has found that there are not unique circumstances attributed to these requests that would warrant
approval of a variance. Therefore, staff recommends DENIAL for the following reasons:
1. If the request is denied, the property may still receive a reasonable return in use. The property may still
be used as a single-family residence without the need for any variances.
2. There are no unique conditions related to shape or topography that render any portion of the property in
question unbuildable.
3. The applicant has created his own hardship by requesting a garage in this location.
4. The request will not result in a substantial benefit or contribution to the neighborhood or community
distinguished from an individual benefit on the part of the applicant.
Board of Adjustment
Case WA-05-14/James Pryor
Jun-15-05 02:58P
SZ
LLC
Real Estate Development -
Edward J. Kanfinan
13490 Lafayette Court
Thornton, Colorado 80241
June 15, 2005
Fax Letter
City of Wheat Ridge
Planning and Zoning
Wheat Ridge, Colorado
Attn: Jeff
303 255-9307
Fax 303 255-9397
bzdev a vahoo.com
Ref: Riley's Roost Subdivision - Request for Variance of Six Feet for Southem
Boundary of Lot 8 that accesses from 37th Street owned by James Pryor
Per Sec. 26-115 Variance/waivers/temporary permits/interruptions
Paragraph C. Variances and waivers:
Paragraph 3. a. through f.
a. Yes, the property in question will yield a reasonable return in use and
service if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by
regulation for the district in which it is located.
b. No, this variance would not alter the essential character of the locality.
c. Yes, the specific property involved would result in a unique hardship
upon the owner as opposed to a mere inconvenience. Given the
length of today's automobiles, and the fact that there is no basement in
this home, there would be no room for storage and a full sized
automobile and/or a SUV would not fit.
d. Yes, the alleged difficulty and hardship was created the person having
an interest in the property. The problem arose when the home,
manufactured off-site was built, an additional four feet was added to
the original design. We initially felt an Administrative Variance would
suffice, but after having the Surveyor review our plans, it was apparent,
that we were not going to have the depth needed for reasonable use.
e. No is the answer to all concerns of the City. Granting this variance
would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other
neighbors.
P.O1
EXHIBIT I
Jun-15-05 02:59P
f. Granting the variance would result in the owner's vehicles being under
cover and with no vehicles parked in the drive. It would give the rest of
the community a clean and orderly look. All of the homes built in
Riley's Roost are "Handicapped Accessible" with oversized doorways
and back bracing for grab rails and are all built with one floor living.
This extra space would accommodate a wheelchair or handicapped
equipment.
Please attach this to my formal application.
Sincerely,
n rte,
es Pryor
Owner
P.02
m 4 Ib
N
Im
Ir I
M„ £O,OO.OS
b~ l ,00'131,
TO I T
r' J
nn nn1 . I M £O,OO.OS
(8 -L:)VdJL) 3APJG 31dnRld
M £O,OO.OS 00_00L
N N
- - - - - - - -
N
I~ .00 OL
W W ` .00 t~
z w z ]Ay H1L£ 1S3M SZLS
12.00' Z 'in Z 8 iM
QWM QW CO X:
O C
oll j 00
j < F (n r 1 no Q.-O ka
Nj l 7 7 I pw u-- ac wwa~gd
I mm V a .dS rh .ix.Y 00'b7il
° 12.00' ,00'OL
S£ OE
IM.
_s - - -O M,£O,OO.OS 00'M RDVNrot
0
b
V
n
L >
V
Z
L
IOw(
c1 I °'j w :
Lq b
Ls'unun,s LLJ
43SY3 v M
£O,OO.OS
D
Z
LLJ
Q
1=
r
F--
LJJ
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
u
Z
$
kj~
>
Q
~
7
M
N
!1
M
M
Z ~
5
V I
0
0
o
ZyZj=N~
*
~ 9
N
.
.
0 0
W-
~
d
CL
Lij
0
O
<>V
3:
;
N v
w
Z
C
i
O
h
N
DI
w
0
J
Y
a
m
W
z Z
J
Q °
m W J
~ I
I I
I
I
I I
! j
I I
I ,
w
V N
N
J
Q O
V °
z
Z
z
Qa~
C
0
.z =e
nT
7U7
~p
F
G7
C~
w 0
M j
r ~
yZN
r Z W O
~02~
A 006,
LLii~
Z°yjO
°C>Zr
U1 t; o
z
w
0 Z. oix-o
r~Orq
W x 6
LUZ
Z W:
L11 0
V)
Q O L]C W ~
OLL
zz
nom- L~UU
fn to V) LLJ
JO/OO l1-
N
W'
Lij
>)or
' c
n
CL f d> 2 If
00 Ln
NI-
N~ ° v
~
"'0 U0vF-i
in
a
o~
$ 3 S ~ F 1 S S 3 8 a S /O • /O - aOO,2 /O 5 3 3 ~ Cm~ o~ ~¢,(.~.a.Da,-; . I
RILEY'S ROOST SUBDIVISION d
A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAS
OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORADO
FINAL PLAT
19
r~ro
egg
w
9
P7
8
8
?3
r
11~ WbEf NDRTIE.LST I/•
) 1/2" 1 5 W IM NINOI
"INT IM LS 2!379
WIFLATTED
R-J z0NIN9
lo' unum AIO
'
~
' S
MIAI MADE Ge
N
lE ]
tEE
D
~
Y
€
»
0 FT.
5' 6.9
'
' $7613
0.15
I 60.65
I
_
N ~ -r
Y
LOTS S w
>a. R.
i l0i 1
s os1
fb.R
SYYS
6 69Y2'O>-E 16M.15'
~
Ins: a'
$vKSJC~'T
L,6T
N
efI1E i-- b'
-3s
L
RJ ZO .r ~s
I~
N f9•b'JS'9 303.95' ~ W
-IR.'tf- -130.00'-- I ']J
LITY AMf 300111MR ..TILL
Eplp EA3wOE ~
NT 9" ""1
fU1 LDIN~~RF1111• wI i-n I// i -
<
3f01e>•A. 1. FT.
gg~~ ^ e
~ . S' IRILITT A1D MAIMOE
EwsENlfrt stE NOM ]
M
TRMT G
RIPR-K-f11Y 21dF)Y
mpfI W R Nit FIJI
f -
1371 .e9
1001756 FA~5K
5' OTILITY R1
.K. EKLEIIT 8FE R1~
_
<3' IITYIT~-SIT
S f9•N'A•E l
s
I
0 FRR M
71f W.R~
1c zmlIIN0
N
~
10!!
Z
O
t
j
I
W
=1 M-r
E SIIM
ER 1fi 1N9
LOT 3
a 23.9)8
M ITV. g J
8
8g r---I
lOT
I
OJ1 tO.
3~O3S
9•b 1
.00'
lf
6
LOT :
9.932 W.FT.
3791
- - IJ0.00'-
rE wRxEe x9RTNEASr 1/.
3 1/1' Wes W IN RAP
POIxT 80R It L179
LOTS ♦.E. ANDERSON SIIWIVi
141 9Wl 6 PAtE If
MIA Ztl11M9
PLAT SOON 6 PAGE 21
LOT 9 A.F. ANOER80N fU8Aiv1
PRO zONINO
LFLATIPOOItEH PRYEt2SON N1fDIr
MD 201111p
M COIIMPR M0ITIEAHi I/1 SERI ON 3'.
7 IRRrn
11DI eE0 41Ot/3203 9100 RER N11. 61bEN.E lJ4LCm. N~ % I
Ma 5/01/2003 IEt: O9D 2SQ FAF CO9IDL79 '
It w
Lot 1
R ATN a{/plrlflW
'i
6,
PVT 10 PAGE q
u
f-J Z9NIN0
I
I
IIV~
J I/T WBf W 1% NA1pF MINT
HOY LS 1111
L' I
Li
L3
L3
LS
Le
LT
EXHIBIT 3
6CJlf I'• 500.
'
' PROJER F90-I
PREPKED I/D1/2002
~
9
EYIf90 ii23/2002
'
~~m>
fY
Y~
REr 19(D 9/le/90C9 R
I
t
1332.15
`A COIINER MKT I/1
I/1' MIKE W IM RANGE
rolxT foa Ls 2ft>9 rlctfle IINP
City of Wheat Ridge
Community Development Department
Memorandum
TO: Applicant; File
FROM: Alan White, Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: WA-05-05/5725 W. 37`a Avenue
DATE: March 22, 2005
m
Case No. WA-05-05 is an application filed by Edward J. Kauffman and is a request for approval of an
administrative variance; a variance from the required 30 foot front yard setback in the Residential-One C
(R-1C) zone district. The property is 5,085 square feet in size, 50.85 feet wide, and 100 feet in depth.
Pursuant to Section 26-208 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, a minimum front yard setback of 30 feet
is required. The applicant wishes to construct an attached garage to be located 27 feet from the south
(front) property line, which is 3 feet less than the required setback. The property is located at 5725 W.
37a' Avenue and is zoned R-1C.
Pursuant to Section 26-115 (C) of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, the Zoning Administrator is
empowered to decide upon applications for a minor variance or waiver (10 percent or less), without
requirement of public hearing, provided that the following conditions are met:
1. The variance or waiver does not exceed ten percent (10%) of the minimum or maximum
standard; and
2. That the Community Development Director finds that the "findings of fact," as set forth below,
are substantially complied with and support the request; and
3. The Community Development Director has notified adjacent property owners by letter notice
and posting of the site at least ten (10) days prior rendering his decision, and that no protests
have been received during such ten-day period; and
4. That no additional dwelling units would result from approval of such a variance or waiver; and
5. That the limitations of Charter Section 5.10.1 are not exceeded.
If all the conditions above are met, the Community Development Director may issue an administrative
variance provided the findings of fact below are met:
Findings of Fact: The Director of Community Development shall decide upon a request for a variance
or waiver, and shall base his decision in consideration of the extent to which the following facts,
favorable to the applicant, have been established by the evidence:
1. Can the property in question yield a reasonable return in use or income if permitted to be used only
under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located?
2. If the variation were granted, would it alter the essential character of the locality?
EXHIBIT 4
3. Does the particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property
involved result in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere
inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out?
4. Has the alleged difficulty or hardship been created by any person presently having an interest in
the property?
5. Would the granting of the variance be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other
property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located, by, among other
things, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, substantially increasing
the congestion in the public streets or increasing the danger of fire or endangering the public
safety, or substantially diminishing or impairing property values within the neighborhood?
6. If criteria one through five are found, then would the granting of the variance result in a benefit or
contribution to the neighborhood or the community, as distinguished from an individual benefit on
the part of the applicant, or would granting of the variance result in a reasonable accommodation
of a person with disabilities?
This request for an administrative variance meets all applicable conditions as required by Section 26-115
(C) of the City of Wheat Ridge Code of Laws. Staff has not received comments in opposition to this
request from the surrounding neighbors.
Case No. WA-05-05 is hereby:
R( APPROVED
❑ DENIED
WITH CONDITIONS:
1. Vehicular access into the property and the proposed garage shall be directly
from 37`x' Avenue.
2. All other applicable development standards shall be met for construction on
the property.
❑ WITHOUT CONDITIONS
, 9L -
Development Director
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT on July 28, 2005, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Municipal Building at 7500 West 29`h Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested citizens
are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. The following petition
shall be heard:
Case No. WA-05-13: An application filed by Republic Garages for approval of a
variance from the 10 foot side yard setback requirement for an accessory structure
resulting in a 5 foot side yard setback for property zoned Residential-Two (R-2) and
located at 3810 Cody Street.
Case No. WA-05-14: An application filed by James Pryor for approval of a variance
from the required 30 foot front yard setback resulting in a 21 foot front yard setback for
property zoned Residential-One C (R-1 C) and located at 5725 West 37th Avenue.
Kathy Field, Administrative Assistant
ATTEST:
Pamela Y. Anderson, City Clerk
To be published: Wheat Ridge Transcript
Date: July 14, 2005
MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Jefferson County Housing Authority
Parcel :021560
Site
:5755 W 37th Ave Wheat Ridge 80212
3261
2890 0001 6401
Mail
:6025 t^~ "~R*h ave ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge co
.
7004
Use
:9139 Exempt,County,Land
Phone
Bedrm:
Bath: TotRm:l YB:1960 Pool:
B1dgSF:8,568 Ac:.
55
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Seiler Harold E
Parcel :022636
Site
:3720 Fenton St Wheat Ridge 80212
7004 2890 0001 6401 3278
Mail
:3720 Fenton St Wheat Ridge Cc 80212
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1963 Pool:
B1dgSF:1,600 Ac:.
30
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
t
Owner
:Seiler Harold E
Parcel :022636
Site
:3• 0 Fenton St Wheat Ridge 80212
Xfered
Mail
:3720 e t W Ridge Cc 80212
Price
Use
:1112 Re ove and
Phone
Bedrm:
3 ath:3.75 TotRm: YB:1963 Pool:
B1dgSF:1,652 Ac:.
30
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
er Harold E
Parcel :022637
Site
:3700 ton St Wheat Ridge 80212
Xfered
mail
:3720 Fent St r Co 80212
Price
Use
:1112 Re ro d
Phone
Bedrm:
Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1956 Pool:
B1dgSF:1,740 Ac:.
15
e-~ -
MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Rose Marla R
Parcel :025114
Site
:5700 W 37th Ave Wheat Ridge 80212
^
Mail
:6381 Umber Cir Arvada Co 80403
7004 2890 0001
6401
3285
Use
:5112 Res,Apartments,Improved Land
Phone -
Bedrm:
Bath: TotRm:l YB:1958 Pool:
B1dgSF:4,073 Ac:.
28
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner Owner
:Cavanagh Michael -
Parcel :025288
Site
:3660 Fenton St Denver 80212
Mail
:3660 Fenton St Denver co 80212
7004 2890 0001 6401 3292
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone .
Bedrm:
3 Bath:1.50 TotRm: YB:1950 Pool:
B1dgSF:1,242 Ac:
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Lubeck Charles Martin
Parcel :025340
Site
:3675 Eaton St Wheat Ridge 80212
t 7004 2890 0001 6401 3308
Mail
:2 Robincrest Ln Littleton Co 80123
Use
:5112 Res,Apartments,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
Bath: TotRm:l YB:1958 Pool:
B1dgSF:4,200 Ac:.
28
* • MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) •
Owner
:Meeker James E
Parcel :025515
Site
:3690 Eaton St Wheat Ridge 80212
-
7004 2890 0001 6401
3315
Mail
:3690 Eaton St Wheat Ridge Co 80212
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
2 Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1955 Pool:
B1dgSF:952 Ac:
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) •
Owner
:George Steven C
Parcel :026795
Site
:3690 Fenton St Wheat Ridge 80212
7004 2890 0001 6401
3322
Mail
:3231 Alcott St Denver Cc 80211
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
5 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1950 Pool:
B1dgSF:1,189 Ac:.
37
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner Owner
:Luebke Enterprises Ltd
Parcel :047015
Site
:3765 Depew St Wheat Ridge 80212
7004 2890 0001 6401
j
333.9
Mail
:12163 W 30th P1 Denver Co 80215
j
Use
:5112 Res,Apartments,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
Bath: TotRm:2 YB:1972 Pool:
B1dgSF:34,599 Ac:2
.03
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Bolis Sara Marie
Parcel :441522
Site
:3702 Eaton St Wheat Ridge 80212
7004 2890 0001 6401
3346
Mail
:3702 Eaton St Wheat Ridge Co 80212
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1910 Pool:
B1dgSF:1,762 Ac:.
55
Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations
or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report.
• MetroScan /
Jefferson
(CO) '
Owner
:Bsg Development III Llc
Parcel :441x" 6401
3353
Site
:5675 W 38th Ave Denver 80212
4 2890 0001
70~
Mail
:13490 Lafayette Ct Thornton Co 80241
_ :aZ45,000
Use
:1111 Vacant,Residential
Phone
Bedrm:
Bath: TotRm: YB:
Pool:
BldgSF: Ac:
.ll
; MetroScan /
Jefferson
(CO) •
Owner
:Bsg Development III ~lc
Parcel :441524
Site
:5 th Ave e Er r 80212
Xfered :04/15/2003
Mail
:13490 e hornton Co 80241
Price :$245,000
Use
:11 acant,Residential
Phone
Bedrm:
Bath: TotRm: YB:
Pool:
BldgSF: Ac:
.ll
*
• MetroScan /
Jefferson
(CO) •
Owner
:Pryor James H
Parcel :441526
Site
:5715 W 37th Ave Denver 80212
7004 2890 0001 6401
3360
Mail
:7262 S Sourdough Dr Morrison Co 8046
5
cz ------T~.-,-.~-- -
_
Use
:1111 Vacant,Residential
Phone
Bedrm:
Bath: TotRm: YB:
Pool:
BldgSF: Ac:
.ll
• MetroScan /
Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:P or James H
Parcel :441527
Site
:5725 ve Denver 80212
Xfered :02/22/2005
Mail
:7262 S Sourdoug ison Co 8046
5
Price :$92,500
Use
•1111 Vacate sidential
Phone
Bedrm:
Bath: TotRm: YB:
Pool:
BldgSF: Ac:
.ll
*
• MetroScan /
Jefferson
(CO) •
Owner
:Konsella Stephen F
Parcel :441528
Site
: *no Site Address*
Mail
:14232 W Warren Pl Lakewood Co 80228
7004 2890 0001 640
1 3377
Use
:1177 Vacant, Residential, Limited Size
Phone
Bedrm:
Bath: TotRm: YB:
Pool:
BldgSF: Ac:
.12
MetroScan /
Jefferson
(CO) •
Owner
:Konsella Stephen F
Parcel :441529
Site
:*n Site Address*
Xfered :10/10/2002
Mail
:14232 rr Lakewood Co 80228
Price
Use
:1177 Va ential,Limited Size
Phone
Bedrm:
ath: TotRm: YB:
Pool:
BldgSF: Ac:
.17
Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations
or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report.
7500 West 29th Avenue
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033
303/235-2846 Fax: 303/235-2857
The City of
Wheat
Ridge
July 14, 2005
Dear Property Owner:
This is to inform you of Case No. WA-05-14 which is a request for approval of a
variance from the required 30 foot front yard setback resulting in a 21 foot front yard
setback for property zoned Residential-One C (R-1C) and located at 5725 West 37th
Avenue. This case will heard by the Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment in the Council
Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue on July 28, 2005, at
7:30 p.m.
As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing
and/or submit written comments.
If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning
Division at 303-235-2846. Thank you.
Planning Division.
\\srv-ci-eng-001 \users\kfield\Kathy\BOA\pubnotice\2005\wa0514.wpd
* Search Parameters
* Jefferson (CO)
* 7/13/2005
* 4:03 PM
Parcel Number...17
39 251 00 008
39 251 00 018
39 251 00 019
39 251 00 020
39 251 00 021
39 251 00 025
39 251 10 001
39 251 10 002
39 251 11 001
39 251 11 012
39 251 11 013
39 251 11 014
39 251 11 016
39 251 11 017
39 251 11 018
39 251 11 019
11-
00
00-008
(100.00')
11-015
0
(IUU.UU')
°
-
N
`160.70'
c
°
0.81
)
98.00'
(1
)
•
~
V
v
11-018
°
~1-01
C°
00-019
N N
01B
0
d
01
q /
309.81'
-
0
0
0
(51.00'
®
- v
00
11-01
(98.80')
%
o
11-01
2
142 71
11-019
11-013
o
~
°
(142 71
00-020
P. k,
11
01
99.00'
99 30'
0.00
) (1
0.3,
-
m 148.01'
139.5'
- -
o
(2 4
(136 2 )
1% 11-001
T
i
o
11-002
(125.00')
q
(17721')
10-001
cc
00-021
12
v,
11-009
1-003
156 80'
°61.31')
(176.21')
cn
(156 80')
(135.30')
N
10-002
(156.50')
-
o
811-008.
A-00'
(
61-006
-0
s-001
1-0c
(1 56.59T
l
0
00-025
w
10-003
cc
-.7
N
~
(137.30')
48.00'
(50.00'
(
10-004
-
(1
4
°
(157.00')
N
co
IV
O
10-005
00-02
4
o
oz•
-
157.00'
0-02%
)-0,'
o-o
-02
-
o
v
Z, yo
0
00-038
22~
41.08'
o
157 00'
rn
00
t1
700 '
8
9
•
o A
00
037
00-035
-03
0
-
.
°
157
30'
c
v
(90.50')
(
.
0-00
0-o1
50
.
LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION
Community Development Department
7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Phone (303) 235-2846
(Please print or type all information)
Applicant 'TAMes eggox Address~Qft) S.i. 4dSad+.&ALVp C-2ao Phone
fo~-3g~/
City 0eWV0& State do Zip F02-27 Fax 3~ °N ~l2y3
City
Zip_
Phone
Fax
Contact Address Phone
City State Zip Fax
(The person listed as contact will be contacted to answer questions regarding this application, provide additional information when necessary, post
public hearing signs, will receive a copy of the staff report prior to Public Hearing, and shall be responsible for forwarding all verbal and written
communication to applicant and owner.)
Location of request (address): 57 ZS LJ 3 -1 't-l` AV L' laJ(~Qa~fl2r~ c co
Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request)
Application submittal requirements on reverse side
❑ Change of zone or zone conditions
❑ Special Use Permit
❑ Consolidation Plat
❑ Subdivision: Minor (5 lots or less)
❑ Flood Plain Special Exception
❑ Subdivision: Major (More than 5 lots)
❑ Lot Line Adjustment
❑ Right of Way Vacation
❑ Planned Building Group
❑ Temporary Use, Building, Sign
❑ Site Development Plan approval
❑ Variance/Waiver (from Section )
❑ Other:
f5rx)
1 description of request: tl0 l
Required information:
Assessors Parcel Numb yyr:Size of Lot (acres or squaye footage): S oel~3
Current Zoning:_ ~R d Proposed Zoning: ,
Current Use: Proposed Use: /F
I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge
and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above,
without whose consent the requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners
must submit power-of attatney~from,#he owner which approved of this action on his behalf.
Signature of Applicant
TONI E RIVARD
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF COLORADO
To be filled out by staff-
Date received 1//, ` ~
Comp Plan Desig.
Related Case No.
State
me this _day of 20 Or
Z
Notary Public
My commission expires 9_ / O(P
Fee$ /E Receipt No.G6)1~7Aj Case No.
Zoning _ g- I Quarter Section Map
Pre-App Mtg. Date Case Managerd/2. T
- 1
Im I -
M„ £O,OO.DS
00'eo
o- L--
m
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - r'------- J
F ,00'00 L M„£0,00.05
(8 .LD`ddJ) 3^1214 ILVARId
n
M £O,OO.OS 1 0000L
_ _ J _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1O
° o0 o i c;
ri -I °O
o w 00-rti i N
_ z W Z " 3Ad HiZ 2 1S3M SZdS I;
12.00' OWIn ~w 8 10~
III I ~ ~ILO F M i ' ~ , 0 ~s
°'I I ~ ' ww~++~a~~na n
O O I mnv sw~~,Y=.r 00" mi
° 12.00' .000L ...=JII
,SE'OE J T - _ - -h
s _ 40 M„£0,00.OS 00'O01 awNwa ',unun.s
t~Z M„20,00
o~.
=
w
off,
Iz
a
<
I~
V
/I.
S
ri
w
j Vlk
I ~ I Vf
- M„£0,00.OS-
t
s
s
W
Q
1 `
i-
U)
W
z
<T-
3at2
906
o~ m
ZU C!V
ywy ? 0
n~
o a=
U s
Z FW't N ° cn
= N If
gd~,-mz Lij
~F
O2
Z vi
W DO W y w
a
w 0 O W~WWrJJ
V/mNOd LL 1r
h Z
w
Y
m Y-
z Z Z
z
9 o
m J
1
w I I
I
I
I I
i I
I
Z
_
aL
I
I
I
z
c
CQ
am=
~HriO
FZw0
J N
Fr
C O Z
0
3
Q b
U2
~
Z
t; o
U
x
a
N
QY W J
LL^Z
_a
O
Z
W 'LL
°
ZpFo
~
~x.
OW
I.Uz
N p00
j
zz~
0
>
QO dw~
a
p
Q °C'
0 -
0
C'y
< v
^
w
=
m NN
~o
U-
'Q
u
j=
~D r
NO
oo~N
m O ° II
o-
w
LnOD Z~
o»v o.
O Ot
E
A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-OUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER
OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORADO
FINAL PLAT
M 2'6TE• 26MJS' ~~C_-_-_+
- -
~~gOgRIER NORTHEAST V1 1324.06'
FOINT BOX LS ZCAP927oN RAtYE L WE GORIER WORDY T i/a
PT BOXALS ~79N RAKE
uolr+ rrLA2" w
x w•46•SS•r I31.e9' §I
I~ N 67.30'46'1 RI
AID I -
tri 10 UT1I,I TTASEIE
H.e ORA 11 E
WE IDTE 3 `
r« LOT6
n 5' 6.946 SOFT.
9.15 60.65 5765 I I
N `46 r
YM n
~55 wag r
w L2
a a _ yr
SPUN
? • 35- a
ss t w SCALE 1*- 40*
N n
y. n
i ~n I LUESKE APARTAENT, j
D w LOT t6 »F a 8~ R_3 ZONING ' Y
Ez gg
~ g SS.FT. LOT
g • ~ - SO1F5T. gz l I S
S&3 157LS N 69•A6 '35'W 305.95" Ir}ps: RI
n _ p I. p] - LOT 3 A.E. ANDERSON SUBDIVISION
, ~ o 175.95'- --I PSI) .00'-- Ib41 ~ PLAT ZOIfl HG PAGE 23
r S' UTILITY AND DRAIIM09 I S' UTILITY AID ORAINAIE
SN'46'_3 = M9'46'34'E n EASE1ffNT SEE NOTE 3 I-SASEIENT SEE "Ott 3 ( /
7
nl IXIYINO BUILDINGS TO REWIN I$nl LOTH
LpT w 3701 Do" ST. ~Ij 0.934 SO.FT. ~a H*I
Ig 1.465 • g I $ w w 37DPS _ o i e LOT 9 A.E. ANDERSON SUBDIVISION
ge I FI'`pV
LOT 1 PLAT ODOR 6 PAGE 23
SO.fT g ya~a 8 g LOT 3 'W 1 .00' ;N g I 3 PRO ZONING
8OFi. gl 0 23.FT. ~~I$ _-v,
L 973 30.
$615 ~~~~~11I11 N..
I- S' UTILITND ORAIMAOE
Sl2S yr+ IS EASE1ENr SEE NOTE 3
32 g
50~6s' ~m ses•ra•as~L 8b og z 9
LOT 2 td i:
SO w D{ SO.H' I Q S~ Er16Y5 al 6.932 W.FT. $ z : LOT 10 A.E. ANDERSON SUBDIVISION
H7C-NAY FIEIIH►Y 6 1 1. S' yyST ILITY AND pRA1 SOS ~TL 10N~NB6 PAGE 26
NCA Y /NI8 PVT BOOR 7S{ Nplp~Sa3 .46' EAO[MENI 668 NOTE S
03
100
Ht BR!~tr P0 NE
LOT 9 EYELYN SiRDIY1310N OR INNING
715 SO.FT. PLAT GOOK 10 PAGE 49 I (
a~i g I R-tC zoxlNG I pK0Ta3TZ LE o0p aION ( al
UPVLATYED
~r
Aa 2"6
_ j 1322.75• 1----}_ j OWfM
M 90•00'00'E 2614_49
`lr CORNER NORTHEAST IM 6E CORNER NORTHEAST 1/4 SECTION 25
3 I/2' GRABS CAP IN RANGE 3'1/TaRAiS CAP IN RAWK POINT
P91MY BOX LS 26279 VICINITY IMP BOX LS 13212
LINE
I• STEVE KONEELLA, BEING THE ORDER OF THE REAL PROPERTY OF 1.905
ACRES DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: .
THE KaOtH 137.43 FEET QF THE "TIM OF THE NORTHEAST WASTER OF
THE WORT11REST QUARTER O THE NDRiIEAST 9NARTER Of SECTION 45
EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCAISm IN RECEPTION NIMER 02031512 THE
JEFFERSON COUNTY RECORDS, TOOMM wM THE SOUTH I AGE OF THE
EAST 2 ACRES OF THE WEST ONE-HALF NORTHEAST ONE-WASTER
NORTHWEST ONE-11 NORTHEAST (yam OHygTER OF SECTION /e5
70WNEHIf 3 SOU TH. RA6IE 69 BEST 0671E-67H PRINCIPAL IERIOIAN CITY
OF NEAT RIDGE, JEFFERSON COUNTY COLORADO EXCEPT THAT PORTION
DESCRIBED PARRTIC LARLY lift"GI~ AS FOOLLLOO": COUNTY RECORDS
K um IDTARY SEAL
DATA CHART
MASER
BEARING
DI'YANCE
L I
S 69.46'34'1
S.13'
L 2
S 89.4635'E
2000'
L 3
N WW'03'E
25.W'
L x
S WW'03•W
25. W'
L 4
4 69'46'35"1
20. 0
L 6
N 71.06'49.1
21.67
L 7
N W'W'03'E
10.97
SCALE 1•- SW'
PROJECT K90-!
CITY COUNCIL CERTIFICATION
APPROVED THIS U DAY OP 02. NY TTE WHEAT slow tin
COUNCIL.
ATTE
CI f$K~~ W
liT
PLAN/INO ,Ca S&4*jdm cuirtF1GTION
PLANNING ~ BAY OF 2002. 1 THE WEST tiom
APPROiPED
PLANyNp MONENT DIRECTOR
m
UIH
FEET
A
OF
DI OF PURL WORM
SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE:
1. STEVEN D. LISTER, DO HIGHEST CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY OF TIE
a DARY F RILEY'S ROOST SMIV1SI0N WAS WX UNDER MY
SUPWISION. RESPONSIBILITY AND CHECKING DURING FEBRUARY, 2001 AND
TO TIE BEY OF W KNOWLEDGE IWORIMTION AND GUIEF AID IN
ACCORD WITH ALL APPLI Ea.WMDD STATUTE? CURRENT REVISED
EDDITION'NASS AAIAI NDED AND ACCOMYWING PLAT ACCURATELY.
R SURVEY.
AE0ISTERFD LAND suRYEYaR
1MW C9LOAAW NLNRER 1G63T
9500 WE87ItTNAYEMIE
LJUR7WD~CA2EWIA0080215
Li>R 303.235-
NCTICE:
IMO TO DEFECT IN IKT gREMCE AMY I,EOAL ACT10N
BASED
BARED UPON ANY Y SELECT IN THIS MYEY Nr ITNIN'. RS-AFTER YOU
FIRST DISCOVER !HUSH DEFECT. IM $UN HD EVENT MAY ANY ACTION AR
. THAN TEN YS
ANY OEfEttIN THIS SURVEY iO DWOEENOM NOSE TFRW TEN EARS PROW
-FkOtl
NAPE DATE O THE CERTIFICATION MM HEW.
NOTES:
1. 516 INCH DIAMMIk REND WITH CAP STA PW 'LANE END SRV INK: 16637'
SKY AT POINT KNOW TMR:G THE
BAS
SHOW PLATT 13 TIPS AS M TINE OUTNO LINES OFATHECNORRTTWAAISITOF THIS
ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 25 SEARS 11.90•00'00`E.
06I111LOrMIMAN BBDEBo OWL
Uj~ Ali
MD A Y PUBLIC
CASE HISTORY i-
WS-01-01 i`111` T~
THE
E
OF
FOR
AND
TREET
6. LOT 6 MAY ONLY GAIN VENICOLAA ACCESS FROM VEST 31TH AVENUE.
7. PARKING I6 NOT PERMITTED ON THE PRIVATE DRIVE
S.TIE PRIVATE DRIVE SHOULD BE CLEARLY SIGNED AS FIRE ACCESS.
9. 5/6 INN BRASS WASHER STAMED 'LS 16637' SET AT POINT SHORN TFRW:O
10'• THE DOER. "IS SUCCESSOR$ AND ASSEOR GRAirtS LIMITED RIWITS AND
1y2.~STTHHLE CURRENT ZONING OFTHE06 011TBEO TRACT t$ R-1C
AND
fWTERLOCXApRP0PER/YAf7tE aWOF: DOTS SaN6157ETIBRSTYtO
O FEIICEa
LA703CAPIID,OOa OTHER ►ENMANENI BT~UC}OREE IS PRW {a1T10.
COUNTY CLERK AND RE ONDEAS CERTIFICATE ,
THIS 00dMAENT~^ 770 FOR IL)IwINLT116 OFFICE OF ILt CV_tNTY.
STATE OF COLORADO 153
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON 1
THE Fp p,1/D iNSiRM1EMT me ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE NE THIS
DAY OF jam. 2002 BY STEVE KONSELLA AS OWNER.
Residential Worksheet (SF/Duplex)
Submittal requirements:
Copy of Deed El Site Plan (to scale) Elevations El
Address: 5-125- W 3-7 A, /F
Zoning: Q-1 ` Use: S'F Property in the flood plain? 00
Lot Size: S Of) 5~_ sq. ft. Lot Width: 9 ft.
Maximum Lot Coverage: 4-0 %
Proposed Improvements:
House: 1 559 sq. ft.
Addition to House: sq. ft.
Shed: sq. ft.
Detached Garage: sq. ft.
Proposed Lot Coverage: (Total) 3y %
sq. ft.
Required Setbacks: FR -30 74`' / S S S S
Maximum Size:
Provided Setbacks: FR ~ 1 S 7. 6 S 8.2 R /0
Maximum Height: 3 f ft.
Proposed Height: C ft.
sq. ft.
9f9 sq. ft.
R
7-o34-
sq. ft.
Proposed Size: 1 7r9 sq. ft.
Access Notes
For one and two-family dwellings, the first 25' of driveway area from the existing edge of pavement into the site
shall be surfaced with concrete, asphalt, brick pavers or similar materials.
For all uses other than one and two family dwellings, no vehicle entrances or exits may be closer than 25' to any
property line, except when used as joint access for two or more lots.
In residential zone districts, curb cuts shall be at least 10 feet and not more than 24 feet in width.
One and two-family dwellings may have horseshoe driveways, provided that the street accesses are at least 30 feet
apart, measured from the interior edges.
For all uses, one access point per property is permitted.
Landscapin¢ Notes
For one-and two-family dwellings, one tree for every 70 feet of street frontage is required.
1009E of the front yard and 25% of the entire lot must be landscaped prior to issuance of C.O.
2-a34-
sq. ft.
Existing Improvement(s):
House: sq. ft.
Shed: sq. ft.
Detached Garage:
Other:
Street trees required: Street trees provided:
N 0 100 200 Feet
Case No.:
P0514
App: Last Name:
Pryor
App: First Name:
_.ames
Owner: Last Name:
ame
Owner: First Name
:
App Address:
750 W. Wadsworth Blvd. C!
City, State Zip:
Denver CO 80227
App: Phone:
03-394.222.2_ _
Owner Address:
ame
City/State/Zip:
Owner Phone:
ame
Project Address:
725
Street Name:
est 37th Avenue
City/State, Zip:
heat Ridge, 0080033
Quarter Section Map No.: NE25
Related Cases:
Case History: foot front yard setback
anance
Review Body:
APN:
2nd Review Body:
2nd Review Date:
Decision-making Body:
Approval/Denial Date:
Reso/Ordinance No.:
Case Disposition:
Project Planner: Hirt
File Location: ctive
Notes:
Follow-Up:
~W
BOA: 7/2105 _
Conditions of Approval:
District:
Date Received: /5/2005.,.
Pre-App Date:.
CTTY OF WHEAT RIDGE
OTN7,10 1!.3" AM vdb
D5G DEVELOPMENT; LLC
RECEIPT NO;COM32' AMOUNT
FM~D TONING APPLICATION{ F _00 -0
ZONE
FMSD ZONING REINBURSEVk
"REIN
PAYMENT RECENED AMOUNT
CK 1119 390,00
TOTAL 390.00