HomeMy WebLinkAboutWA-05-176545 W 44th Ave
Wheat Ridge, Cc 80033
October 15, 2005
City of Wheat Ridge
Planning Dept
Attn: Jeff Hirt
7500 W 29th Ave
Wheat Ridge, Cc 80033
SUBJECT: YOUR AND MY TELEPHONE CONVERSATION WHICH BEGAN
APPROXIMATELY 9:37am FRIDAY OCT 14, 2005
Dear Jeff,
First, I wish to be very clear, I have no issues with you,
personally. Any involvement I have had with with you, you were
very nice and fair. Also, I had the feeling, during our subject
conversation, you were embarrassed with the message which you
had for me.
You stated the traffic engineering department would not permit
the two (2) angle parking spaces in front of the proposed building
to be striped because of their stated safety concerns, because of
vehicles backing over the right-of-way (ROW) There are thirteen
(13) parking spaces in front of the current development four (4)
of which are angle parking spaces. Vehicles parking in any of
those thirteen (13) spaces, to leave the premises would back over
the ROW. During the twenty four (24) plus years the current
development has been there, SAFETY of vehicles backing over the
ROW has not been a problem.
Inspite of the fact that SAFETY has not been a problem and inspite
of the fact that I went through the process and was given unamious
approval by the Board of Adjustment for the partical waiver for
landscaping to make room for those two parking spaces, you were
told to tell me that the traffic engineer department not only
disapproved this late in the process, but they have the authority
to do that even though the above stated permission was granted.
Included in your message that the traffic engineer dept would not
permit the striping of the two parking spaces in front of the
proposed building is that I could put the two parking spaces on my
adjacent property, BUT in order for those two spaces to count as
two of the thirteen spaces, I would need to eliminate the property
line between the existing project and the new project.
That is when I reminded you that this is a retail project and the
retail customers would come and park in that area whether it was
striped or not. You agreed, but stated, even though customers
park there, that area cannot be striped and cannot be used for two
of the thirteen required spaces.
-2-
I can tell wh I was of the impression mb~ a ed be' 9
y you wer terse carrier of
that message, as I would have been embarrassed, too. I am of
the mpinionrthat did not come from the traffic engineering dept.
That came from someone who is using the traffic engineering dept
to support this ANTI-BUSINESS maneuver.
I object and find that unacceptable. I made it very clear, from
the beginning, that I would apply to the Board of Adjustment for
the same waiver as I did, and received,in 1981 for the existing
project.
If the traffic engineering dept has such power, then staff has
the responsibility to advise BOTH myself and the traffic engineering
dept of my plans when we are in the early stages of planning. It
is not acceptable that after the plans were completed and the Board
of Adjustment has approved the waiver to make room for those two
parking spaces, one of which is in compliance for handicap, that
traffic engineering can step in and basically say, 1) property
owner you cannot make such plans with staff, and 2) Board of
Adjustment you cannot grant such waiver of landscaping to make
room for those two parking spaces.
You included in your subject message to me the issue of property
lines. I own all of this property and IN GENERAL would not have
reason to object to eliminating that property lin etween the exist-
ing project and the new project or any of the oth r property lines
involved. Unfortunately it seems obvious that someone hopes to use
the absence of a property line in an anti-business maneuver. I will
not tolerate such tactics. I made it very clear, in the beginning,
that the adjacent property, owned by me is to remain grandfathered,
as it is now. The plans submitted and approved, included the fact
that the adjacent property would remain grandfathered.
Jeff, I standby my letter to you, dated 09-30-05.
the satement I requested is acceptable, other that
the current project will remain grandfathered if I
any or all of the property lines involved with the
and the removal of any of those property lines wil
affect the new project.
No revision of
to simply say
choose to eliminate
current project
1 not adversely
In addition to my request for the above official signe Statement
by the City of Wheat Ridge, I request an officially si ned
statement by the City of Wheat Ridge retracting the message.of which
you were the verbal carrier,that the striping of the two (2) angle
parking spaces to be infront of the proposed building, will not be
included as two (2) of the thirteen (13) required spaces.
As I stated earlier, there are thirteen parking spaces in front of
the curren~project with four of them angle parking. If anyone
parks in any of those thirteen spaces, to leave thev would back
over the ROW. Adding two more angle parking spacesto the new
project with customers backing over the ROW will cause the same
safety problems we have had for the past twenty four plus years,
-3-
which is NONE. The traffic engineering dept has no basis for
stating there is a safety problem issue at either the current
development or the proposed new development.
In general, my planning with the City has been very pleasant.
I would like to believe any anti-business tactics is an embarrass-
ment to any of those good,folks with which I have been working.
Including but not limited-to Doug at the fire dept, Alan White, and
Meredith, each encouraged me to eliminate involved property lines
because of benefits to me. I am sure they were unaware there may
be those who would use the disappearance of property lines as a
means to hassle a long time business person who is also a long
time property owner who landscapes and beautifies his property-more
than most. I followed procedure to obtain the waiver to have room
for the two striped parking spaces in front of the proposed building.
The work of the land surveyor that eliminates any property lines
WILLINOT be filed until the City puts a stop to those who wish to
hassle.
THEREFORE:
1. I expect those two requested officially signed statements no
later than 12:00 noon on Tuesday, October 18, 2005.
2. I expect to begin construction of the proposed building very
soon, without any ANTI-BUSINESS hassling tactics by any of
those with the City who may wisl.to,do so.
If I do not receive those requested officially signed statements
within my stated deadlineand if I receive anymore anti-business
hassles from those who may wish to do so, fro4 he City of Wheat
Ridge, it is attorney time.
n erely,,/-)
i
.7erry oach
Copies to:
Wanda Sang, city counsel
Dean Gokey, City counsel
Randy Young, city manager
Gretchen Cerveny, mayor
- District II
- District II
41
F
ja
yY
~41
ri
wtf 3
V
Prior to his presentation, Jeff H= entered a letter from the applicant into the
record. A copy, of this letter was provided to each Board Member and also made
a part of the case file. After the Board had opportunity to review the letter, I&
Hut outmed all pertinent documents into the record which were accepted by Chair
BLAM He advised the Board there was jurisdiction to hear the case and
reviewed the staff report and digital presentation. Staff recommended denial of
the request for reasons outlined in the staff report.
The applicant is planning to build. a 2,700 square foot addition to an existing
commercial structure. With these proposed changes there are required
landscaping improvements under the Code.
Board Member HOWARD commented that the applicant could have applied for a
zone change to Planned Commercial Development Meredith Recka t explained
that zoning is in place to allow the addition and therefore the applicant could not
be required to rezone to a planned Commercial Development, even though staff
would have preferred it. There would be more flexibility with landscaping under
aPCD. -
y 1<taa
j eh g.
7331 V to; 44"' Avenue
I& Roach, the applicant, was swum in by Chair BLAIR. He stated that his
originai plans called for a six-foot landscapebuffer in front of the fence on the
northern boundary of the property. He and his architect were then told that the
buffer was not necessary because of the six-foot fence. In response to a question
from Board Member BL.AIR, Mr. Roach stated that he could not recall the name
Mr. Roach disagreed with the staff report that landscaping in front of the existing
building was nonconforming because he reccived a variance for the landscaping
its 1481. He stated he would be providing more landscaping in front than required
by the city while many neighboring properties do not seem to take pride in
landscaping. He provided photos of those properties. He, offered to add
additional landscaping at the corner of 44°h and Vance at the other end of the
building.
Board Member ABBOTT suggested that it would be advantageous to Mr. Roach
and the city if his two lots were combined Mr. Roach stated that a land surveyor
is presently looking into this. Meredith Reckert commented that, while
combining the lots would help to more eJcttively deal wltb parking and
Board of Adjustment
09-22-05
20 "d 6r. 11 9x?7- 02 day
l
e six-foot buffer strip at the rear of the property would still-~~-;~,
to accommodate fire access around the rear of the building
-2-
ZS8ZS4L202:~~
and '8 9NINgH-d
ky
6545 W 44th Ave
Wheat Ridge, Cc 80033
September 30, 2005
City of Wheat Ridge
Planning Dept
Attn: Jeff
7500 W 29th Ave
Wheat Ridge, Cc 80033
E
Dear Jeff,
The issue of the property lines on the adjacent property should not
have been an issue included in the recommendation for Denial.. During
my early discussions with the City, I made it very clear that if
this new development did not allow us grandfather such conditions
of the existing development, includinJo
ut not limited to the parking,
landscaping, and the roof mount HVAC is, I would not add.-the new
development. I was assured the new development could be done and
the condition of the exixting project would remain grandfathered.
Later, at the meeting at the fire station and in the presence of
Alan White and Travis, Doug,of the fire department, stated with-.a
very helpful attitude, I would have cost savings, mainly in fees
if the one property line between the new development and the exising
project would be eliminated. I pointed out, at that time, cost
saving is fine, if the existing project remains grandfathered.
_ Also, the issue of the 6 feet of landscaping along the 70 feet of
the North 6 foot fence should not have been included in the
recommendation for Denial. Per discussions with Travis, Travis
told both the architect and myself that the 6 feet of landscaping
is not required because the 6 foot fence is there.
r r
To avoid the chances of more unpleasant surprises, I will not
continue the process of eliminating any property lines at my
property at the 7300 block of W 44th Ave, UNTIL I receive, in
writing, officially from the City of Wheat Ridge, the following
assurances:
Removing any or all of the property lines will not alter any
of the following:
1. Parking as it exists at
parking plans for the ne
2. Landscaping as it exists
and landscaping plans fo
W 44th Ave,
3. Not require screening of
4. Will not adversely effect
at these properties.
7337, 7393, 7397 W 44th Ave and
w development at 7331 W 44th Ave,
at 7337, 7393, 7397 W 44th Ave
r the new development at 7331
the present HVAC roof mounts,
new and existing development
RECOMMENDATION FOR DENIAL.
-a-
A reminder, I did volunteer to add some landscaping to the south-
west cornor of 7397 W 44th Ave and added that such landscaping
would be such that it would not interfere with presnt parking and
parking access, present loading and unloading and loading and
unloading access, and also not to interfere with handicap and
pedestrian access. One Board member added a friendly amendment .
to my request for a partical waiver, to comply with the offer
which I just described.
My opinion, including those issues in the recommendation for Denial
is a return to some reasons why the City of Wheat Ridge, hopefully
in the past, had the reputation that developers should avoid the
City of Wheat Ridge. That reputation is what many of us have
worked very hard to be convincing that the City of Wheat Ridge
should no longer have.
I request and expect prompt actin hat those 2 issues be eliminated
so we may, without additional del y begin construction. Prompt
action is a must because 1) weather soon will be a factor, and
2) more important price of materials will soon increase because of
New Orleans. I am told the price increase will probably be.
substantial,
incerel
erry RoaschU6Qv
P S - Reference the FAX which I just received, case #3 on
pagegN is in error. As you will note the triangle which
has availableyyis on the southwest area of the plans of
he new Teve bpment.
tl` However, in the letter to which you referred, I did volunteer
to landscape at the southwest cornor of 7397 W 44th Ave,
whi4s the Northeast cornor of Vance and 44th Ave. I
decsrioed that offer in this letter, also.
Thank you for that FAX. I will review more closely to see
if I recognize any other errors.
6545 W 44th Ave
Wheat Ridge, CO
Sept 26, 2005
City Of Wheat Ridge
Planning Department
Attn: Chet
7500 W 29th Ave
Wheat Ridge, Cc 80033
SUBJECT: 6 FOOT LANDSCAPING BESIDE NORTH FENCE AT 7331 W 44 AVE
First, I wish to thank all who participated in the Sept 22 meeting.
Chet, based on the information which you had-, you presented my case
very well and the board approved the waiver which I requested.
Now, the 6 foot landscape in front of the 6 foot fence at the North
side of my property. As you know, I was asked, at this meeting,
who said and when was it said that both the 6 foot fence and the
6 foot landscaping is not required at the North end of my property.
I responded that it is too bad my architect, Eric Scholz, is not
here because he reminded me that both of us were told that at a
meeting..
The morning of Sept 23 I called Mr Scholz. He reminded me that
when we met with Travis to review the notes made in red on the
blueprints. Mr Scholz also reminded me that this was the same
meet in which Travis told me the City is much more tough now,
compa`Yed to when, by waiver, I was allowed to do the landscaping
which is now in front of 7337 W 44th Ave. Travis went on to say
because the City is more tough, I would not be granted the waiver.
After the above mentioned meeting, I called the fire department to
request a meeting with them and stated that I would bring with me
a site plan which would allow more room for the fire equipment.
The fire chief called me back to say we could meet the folloeing
morning and that he invited Chad Root to be present at our meeting.
We met that morning. Travis and Alan White also attended that
meeting. The fire chief had no objections with my site plan.
Since I knew what was acceptable with the fire Dept. I made a
more detailed site plan and then called Travis to meet with him.
We met and discussed my site plan and agreed that my architect
should redo the site plan to reflect my drawing of the site plan.
I left with Travis a copy of my drawing. There was a discrepancy
with what I left with Travis, The drawing did not include the
6 foot landscaping beside the North fence, but my note which
accounted for the total landscape square feet did include that
landscaping.
-2-
After I received the revised site plan, done by the architect, I
met with Travis. As was agreed, the site plan done by the architect
did not include the 6 feet of landscaping beside the 6 foot fence
to the North. Fortunately, the architect did not include the
discrepancy which I did. I pointed out to Travis that architect
surprised me with the planter at the Northeast cornor of the
building. I told Travis that surprise was discussed with the
architect and the architect and I agreed that 171 square feet
for landscaping is available at the Southwest area of the proposed
building and we would gain an additional 50 square feet of landscape
area. Travis was pleased with that.
The above mentioned meeting between Travis and myself was on Aug 15.
After that meeting I wrote a check to the City for X390.00 to be
included with my application for the Sept 22 meeting with the Board
of Adjustment. Between Aug 15 and Sept 21 when I received my notice
of Denial, nobody contacted me to advise me that what Travis told
both me and the architect was not correct.
Enclosed is a photocopy of the envelope used for my notice of Denial.
The post mark is Sept 20, which means I could not receive the Denial
any sooner than the day beforethe Board meeting. That did not give
me much time to be able to tell the Board such details as 1) who
said and 2) when was it said that BOTH the 6 foot fence and 6 feet
of land scaping are not required.
To sum this all up, the following is my situation. Because both
the architect and I were told, by Travis, that BOTH were not required
I have a complete set of building plans to construct a building.
Those plans would need to be changed using the services of the
structural engineer who was done with his work on this project. It
means more fees to the structural engineer to use his services
again. The architect may need more fees, depending on how much
more he is required to do. Therefore, this means more fees and
loss of time.
All of this to plan for a smaller building to accommodate 6 feet
of landscape along a 70 foot fence. That landscaping would be
sandwiched between a 6 foot tall fence and parked vechiles, where
few would see the landscaping. This makes no sense, especially
when now we are told we were adivsed incorrectly.Z Should be able
~,rHouf to proceed with my current building plans and without the 6 foot
landscaping. As you know, I am not against landscaping. I have
ns ra ed that I provide more landscaping and beauty than most.
You can appreciate why the architect requested to see, in writing
what was discussed at our Sept 22 meeting. He and I were told one
thing and now we are told NO.
,,Sincerely,
/-J l erry Roach
5m
o ~
a-c~
o
mz
me
8m
CD
tat
tat
-kr
a~
•L':r
i
tD
s,
C a
CD a
0D
8 rn
o U
0
w
w
•P~RrF
H.
Ny.
','FTJ~ 6L4 ~ r
Tb r
tni~t gy
Hasi2P
C~ =g
f-J
C
Cc
7500 West 29th Avenue
The City of
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Meat
Telephone 303/235-2846 Ridge
FAX 303/235-2857
October 7, 2005
Jerry Roach
7331 W. 44th Ave.
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Dear Mr. Roach:
RE: Case No. WA-05-17
Please be advised that at its meeting of September 22, 2005, the Board of Adjustment APPROVED the
request for a partial waiver of Section 26-502 (Landscaping Requirements) specifically related to the
ten-foot landscape requirement abutting 44th Avenue for property zoned Restricted Commercial and
located at 7331 W. 44s' Avenue for the following reasons:
1. The variance does not alter the essential character of the neighborhood as there is
currently angled parking adjacent to the street.
2. It would not be detrimental to the public welfare and, as designed, the landscaping that
the applicant has included can be perceived as a possible benefit to the neighborhood by
increasing some of the landscaping as seen from the public view.
3. it is not in the best interest of the city or its citizens that this commercially zoned
property remain a vacant, paved and otherwise unimproved parcel.
With the following conditions:
1. Landscaping will be required as shown on the review with planters and trees as
approved by the city.
2. Parking spaces in front that lack adequate depth must be addressed and approved by the
city.
3. Landscaping of the 171 square foot triangle at the comer of 44th and Vance, as
proposed in the applicant's letter, be required.
However, the Board of Adjustment DENIED the request for a partial waiver of Section 26-502
(Landscaping Requirements) specifically related to the required 6 foot wide landscape buffer along the
northern property line for property zoned Restricted Commercial and located at 7331 W. 44 h Avenue.
Jerry Roach
Page 2
October 7, 2005
Enclosed are copies of the Certificates of Resolution, as well as a draft copy of the minutes, stating the
Board's decision which became effective the date of the meeting, September 22, 2005.
Please feel free to contact me at (303) 235-2846 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Kathy Fiel
Administrative Assistant
Enclosures: Certificates of Resolution
Draft of Minutes
Cc: WA-05-17 (case file)
\\srv-ei-eng-001\users\ ieldVCazhy\BOA\CORRESP\2005\wa0517apprmal.wpd
COF
COPY CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTION
I, Ann Lazzeri, Secretary to the City of Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment, do hereby certify that
the following Resolution was duly adopted in the City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson,
State of Colorado, on the 22nd day of September, 2005.2005.
CASE NO: WA-05-17(A)
APPLICANT'S NAME: Jerry Roach
LOCATION: 7331 West 44`n Avenue
WHEREAS, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and
WHEREAS, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-05-17(A) is an appeal to this
Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and
WHEREAS, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law, and in recognition
that there WERE NO protests registered against it; and
WHEREAS, the relief applied for MAY be granted without detriment to the public welfare and
without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing the City of
Wheat Ridge.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Board of Adjustment Application Case No.
WA-05-17(A) be, and hereby is, APPROVED.
TYPE OF VARIANCE: A partial waiver of Section 26-502 (Landscaping Requirements)
specifically related to landscaping along the northern property line for property zoned Restricted
Commercial.
FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
1. The full six foot buffer in this location would seem to serve no practical purpose as to the
intent of the ordinance.
2. The inclusion of the full six-foot landscape buffer precludes the required twenty-foot
drive path around the north side of the building addition as required by the fire
department.
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. Any property remaining along the north property line of 7331 W. 44th Avenue after
provision of the required fire department access required parking dimensions will require
landscaping.
Board of Adjustment
Resolution WA-05-17(A)
Page two (2)
VOTE: YES: ABBOTT, BLAIR, PAGE
NO: HOWARD, HOVLAND
ABSENT: BELL, BYBEE, DRDA
DISPOSITION: A request for a partial waiver of Section 26-502 (Landscaping Requirements)
specifically related to the required 6 foot wide landscape buffer along the northern property line
for property zoned Restricted Commercial was DENIED based on Chapter 2, Article 3, Section
2-53(d) of the City of Wheat Ridge Codes of Law which state that Board of Adjustment motions
not carried are thereby deemed denied.
ADOPTED and made effective this 22nd day of September, 2005.
Bob Blair, Acting Chair
Board of Adjustment
. z1a '
Ann Lazzeri, Secret
Board of Adjustment
CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTION
I, Ann Lazzeri, Secretary to the City of Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment, do hereby certify that
the following Resolution was duly adopted in the City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson,
State of Colorado, on the 22nd day of September, 2005.
CASE NO: WA-05-17(B)
APPLICANT'S NAME: Jerry Roach
LOCATION: 7331 West 44`h Avenue
WHEREAS, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and
WHEREAS, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-05-17(B) is an appeal to this
Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and
WHEREAS, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law, and in recognition
that there WERE NO protests registered against it; and
WHEREAS, the relief applied for MAY be granted without detriment to the public welfare and
without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing the City of
Wheat Ridge.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Board of Adjustment Application Case No.
WA-05-17(B) be, and hereby is, APPROVED.
TYPE OF VARIANCE: A partial waiver of Section 26-502 (Landscaping Requirements)
specifically related to the ten-foot landscape requirement abutting 44th Avenue for property
zoned Restricted Commercial.
FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
1. The variance does not alter the essential character of the neighborhood as there is
currently angled parking adjacent to the street.
2. It would not be detrimental to the public welfare and, as designed, the landscaping that
the applicant has included can be perceived as a possible benefit to the neighborhood by
increasing some of the landscaping as. seen from the public view.
3. It is not in the best interest of the city or its citizens that this commercially zoned property
remain a vacant, paved and otherwise unimproved parcel.
Board of Adjustment
Resolution WA-05-1703)
Page two (2)
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
Landscaping will be required as shown on the review with planters and trees as approved
by the city.
2. Parking spaces in front that lack adequate depth must be addressed and approved by the
city.
3. Landscaping of the 171. square foot triangle at the comer of 440i and Vance, as proposed
in the applicant's letter, be required.
VOTE: YES: ABBOTT, BLAIR, PAGE, HOWARD, HOVLAND
NO: None
ABSENT: BELL, BYBEE, DRDA
DISPOSITION: A partial waiver of Section 26-502 (Landscaping Requirements) specifically
related to the ten-foot landscape requirement abutting 44th Avenue for property zoned Restricted
Commercial was APPROVED.
ADOPTED and made effective this 22nd day of September, 2005.
~c~~~ ~ vV r V
Bob Blair, Acting Chair Ann.Lazzeri, SeckaFy
Board of Adjustment Board of Adjustment
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Minutes of Meeting
September 22, 2005
1. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Acting Chair Blair at 7:30 p.m. in the Council
Chambers of the Municipal Building, 7500 West 29u, Avenue, Wheat Ridge,
Colorado.
2.
ROLL CALL
Members Present: Tom Abbott
Bob Blair
Paul Hovland
Bob Howard
Betty Jo Page
I
3.
4.
Members Absent: Daniel Bybee
Janet Bell
Paul Drda
Staff Present: Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner
Jeff Hirt, Planning Technician
Ann Lazzeri, Recording Secretary
The following is the official set of Board of Adjustment minutes for the public
hearing of September 22, 2005. A set of these minutes is retained both in the
office of the City Clerk and in the Community Development Department of the
City of Wheat Ridge.
PUBLIC FORUM
No one indicated a desire to speak at this time.
PUBLIC HEARING
Acting Chair BLAIR stated that with only five members present, four affirmative
votes would be required to grant a variance. He informed the applicants that they
had the right to request a continuance if they wanted their cases to be heard when
more members were present. There was no response from either applicant.
A. Case No. WA-05-17: An application filed by Jerry Roach for approval of
a partial waiver of Section 26-502 (Landscaping Requirements) for the
property zoned Restricted Commercial and located at 7331 West 44`s
Avenue.
Board of Adjustment 1
09-22-05
Prior to his presentation, Jeff Hirt entered a letter from the applicant into the
record. A copy of this letter was provided to each Board Member and also made
a part of the case file. After the Board had opportunity to review the letter, Mr.
Hirt entered all pertinent documents into the record which were accepted by Chair
BLAIR. He advised the Board there was jurisdiction to hear the case and
reviewed the staff report and digital presentation. Staff recommended denial of
the request for reasons outlined in the staff report.
The applicant is planning to build. a 2,700 square foot addition to an existing
commercial structure. With these proposed changes there are required
landscaping improvements under the Code.
Board Member HOWARD commented that the applicant could have applied for a
zone change to Planned Commercial Development. Meredith Reckert explained
that zoning is in place to allow the addition and therefore the applicant could not
be required to rezone to a Planned Commercial Development, even though staff
would have preferred it. There would be more flexibility with landscaping under
a PCD.
Jerry Roach
7331 West 44`h Avenue
Mr. Roach, the applicant, was sworn in by Chair BLAIR. He stated that his
original plans called for a six-foot landscape buffer in front of the fence on the
northern boundary of the property. He and his architect were then told that the
buffer was not necessary because of the six-foot fence. In response to a question
from Board Member BLAIR, Mr. Roach stated that he could not recall the name
of the person who gave that information during one of several meetings he
attended with the city and fire department.
Mr. Roach disagreed with the staff report that landscaping in front of the existing
building was nonconforming because he received a variance for the landscaping
in 1981. He stated he would be providing more landscaping in front than required
by the city while many neighboring properties do not seem to take pride in
landscaping. He provided photos of those properties. He offered to add
additional landscaping at the corner of 44a' and Vance at the other end of the
building.
Board Member ABBOTT suggested that it would be advantageous to Mr. Roach
and the city if his two lots were combined. Mr. Roach stated that a land surveyor
is presently looking into this. Meredith Reckert commented that, while
combining the lots would help to more effectively deal with parking and
landscaping issues, the six-foot buffer strip at the rear of the property would still
be required. In order to accommodate fire access around the rear of the building
Board of Adjustment - 2 -
09-22-05
as configured, the 6 foot wide required buffer needs to be waived by the Board of
Adjustment. This buffer cannot be administratively waived by staff.
Board Member ABBOTT asked the applicant if he would consider continuing the
case in order to give more time to work out parking and landscaping issues. Mr.
Roach indicated that he would prefer not to delay building construction because
of approaching winter weather.
Chair BLAIR asked if there were any present who wished to address this case.
There was no response.
Upon a motion by Board Member ABBOTT and second by Board Member
PAGE, the following resolution was stated:
Whereas, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer;
and
Whereas, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-05-17(A) is an
appeal to this Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and
Whereas, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law, and
in recognition that there were no protests registered against it; and
Whereas, the relief applied for may be granted without detriment to the
public welfare and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of
the regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge.
Now, therefore, be it resolved that Board of Adjustment Application Case
No. WA-0-17(A) be, and hereby is, approved.
Type of Variance: A partial waiver of Section 26-502 (Landscaping
Requirements) specifically related to the required 6 foot wide landscape
buffer along the northern property line for property zoned Restricted
Commercial.
For the following reasons: DRAFT
1. The full six-foot buffer in this location would seem to serve no
practical purpose as to the intent of the ordinance.
2. The inclusion of the full six-foot landscape buffer precludes the
required twenty-foot drive path around the north side of the building
addition as required by the fire department.
With the following conditions:
Board of Adjustment - 3 -
09-22-05
1. Any property remaining along the north property line of 7331 W. 44th
Avenue after provision of the required fire department access
required parking dimensions will require landscaping.
Board Member HOVLAND commented that the building seemed to be too deep
to accommodate buffering and parking. He asked if the building was redesigned
to be larger when the applicant thought the landscaping buffer was not required.
Mr. Roach replied that the initial plan was drawn up with space for the landscape
buffer. After meeting with the fire department where he was told he didn't need
the buffer because of the six-foot fence, he and the architect proceeded on that
basis.
OVLAND
The motion failed 3-2 with Board Members NAM
voting no.
Chair BLAIR advised the applicant that his request regarding the landscape buffer
along the north property line was denied.
Upon a motion by Board Member HOVLAND and second by Board Member
PAGE the following resolution was stated:
Whereas, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer;
and
Whereas, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-05-17(B) is an
appeal to this Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and
Whereas, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law, and
in recognition that there were no protests registered against it; and
Whereas, the relief applied for may be granted without detriment to the
public welfare and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of
the regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge.
Now, therefore, be it resolved that Board of Adjustment Case No. WA-05-
17(B) be, and hereby is, approved.
Type of Variance: A partial waiver of Section 26-502 (Landscaping
Requirements) specifically related to the ten-foot landscape requirement
abutting 44th Avenue for property zoned Restricted Commercial.
For the following reasons:
Board of Adjustment - 4 -
09-22-05
1. The variance does not alter the essential character of the
neighborhood as there is currently angled parking adjacent to the
street.
2. It would not be detrimental to the public welfare and, as designed, the
landscaping that the applicant has included can be perceived as a
possible benefit to the neighborhood by increasing some of the
landscaping as seen from the public view.
Board Member ABBOTT offered the following friendly amendment:
Reason No. 3: It is not in the best interest of the city or its citizens that this
commercially zoned property remain a vacant, paved and otherwise
unimproved parcel. It-) R AF The amendment was accepted by Board Members HOVLAND and PAGE.
Board Member HOVLAND requested an amendment to add two conditions
to his motion as follows:
1. Landscaping will be required as shown on the review with planters
and trees as approved by the city.
2. Parking spaces in front that lack adequate depth must be addressed
and approved by the city.
Board Member PAGE agreed to the amendment to add the two conditions.
Board Member ABBOTT offered another friendly amendment as follows:
Condition No. 3: Landscaping of the 171 square foot triangle at the corner of
44th and Vance, as proposed in the applicant's letter, be required.
The amendment was accepted by Board Members HOVLAND and PAGE.
The motion passed 5-0.
(The meeting was recessed from 9:10 to 9:17 p.m.)
B. Case No. WA-05-18: An application filed by Michael Pusaterifor
approval of an 8 foot rear yard setback variance from the 15 foot rear yard
setback requirement for a swimming pool on property zoned Residential
One and located at 3201 Nelson Street.
This case was presented by Jeff Hirt. He entered all pertinent documents into the
record which were accepted by Chair BLAIR. He advised the Board there was
Board of Adjustment "
09-22-05
~ O
~D
CD ~
O
N ~
N r'r'
O
C!1 ~
W
W
.p
~D
~D
V1
*OIL
J
7v ^ D
r
(D aj -0
~o
r) ai
o
n
OLo w
3 rn CD
CD r
3
m
n (D
Ln -s
`J O
Up
~o r)
O
r~-r N
N LTI
O O
:D N
(D
Q
CD (D C: Q (D
w N (7 (D C, ;=-cli
0. --1 O -0
(D (D CD
-O -p r* y - N O -c a
rt Co (Q cn LO C7
Q (D n (D -0 (D (D r.~. X
CD 3 0 -0 Q) Ct (D =3 (D 0- r -t- - - (D rt
C: (n O
(D (D 0 0) O -0
M. 0 O -1
C~
r-r 0- LO O
O~ (D ~ o < LO Lo -0 aj 0 O X
,
0- rt O
CD rt =3 cL
G
ET (1) 0 3
-a 0
n o
(D (D
n
~n 0 Q' o°G3
~
A CD
CD D ~ G
O
CD
C N =3
g r- r ~
rn cD m cl - O
=
N
F-`
~
3
(D
C
CD
Ul
(D
_0
n
(D
LO
'
•
(D
O
-0
(D
(D
~
ca
0
.
3
m
r
C)
cr
ca.
QJ
_
o
<
m-
CD
rt
0
CD
-
l
CD
rr-
M
~
Q
_
rn
O
-
0
07
D
rn
Ei,
o
•
:37
L
~D
CD
0
(=D,
(D
~
-0
n:
a-
m
t
CD
-o
-0
0-
CD
-l
M
-
-1
Lo
n
0
~
r
y-
IrD
b
O
O
t ml
n
A~
UQ
fD
b
O
O
N
0
~a
b
A~
C
n
b
O
rr-
r
O
O
UQ
O
n
b
O
r
O
O
UQ
O
cam.
n
O
r
0
0
v.
n
b
O
r
0
0
n
b
O
r
0
0
0
C
cD
n
b
O
r-r
r
O
O
UQ
O
rr-
fD A7 A~ ~ A~
n C ~ ~ rn
C C ~
a~• ~ o ~ aria
C e
~ O ~
A~
W N F-+
C ~ n cC
UQ •J
f
IrD
fD
o fD
CD
C
"t CD
C9 ~
C
M~ •
r)
01
Lri W N h-L
< rf
Q rnr CD
rt 0 n
~.Ln
~ zy- -0
r-r p G G w
CD rr (D 77
r-r D
N CD ~ fD a)
• On p
QC: 6~
CD
Q p
~ ~ rt Q
~ CD O n
un L QJ
::E Ort CCDD LO
p
n o rn
O i- D cn
Q (D ~
aj
(D -i M. cn ~ m
:3 Ct CD n
1° -0 (A M
Lnn
rt C --n Ln
D = O
O 0
CD ~
a CD
F-I
rt
O
O
6
n
ED,
O
n
Ln
O
Qj
rt
CD
ry-
0
rr
O
O
Q
r~-r
rt
D
rt
O -11
D Q O CD
D Q Q CD CD
O cn rt cn M O CD
CAD
LC :O p -0 aj CD
I =r r-t- C: 07 _0
CD- 0 Q O CD
- :3 CD
CD CT FIT O <
m r-r (D r~i-
cn fD D Q Q O r -r
O La Q p O rt 0C:
CD CD w CD fD
p rnr '0 D N O ~
CD -0 ~ Ort LO O
07 0)
CD
n CD CD 6 CD
CD CAD to M O U)
p
CD r-i. 1
r=t CD D 0 0 w CD "O
m -0 -0 (D
Ln -0 CD 0-
O
D r)
Q a)
Ct 07 O
O -ti Lo
O (D
can co r-r N =r O. ray- `G
'O CD O Ln
r*
r-r O -
~ ~ fl1 CD -
cn fD D, -0
CD :3 CD CD
U) (D Lo r-t- aj GO CD
p 1 ~ ~ a)
O E m HT
rt
CD- ~ O
O
6 Q
CD _Ln
O
d
d
Di
O
rt
CD
O
6545 W 44th Ave
Wheat Ridge, Co
Sept 22, 2005
City of Wheat Ridge
Planning Division
7500 W 29th Ave
Wheat Ridge, Cc 80033
SUBJECT: SOME STATEMENTS ON PLANNING DIVISION REPORT ARE A
MISSTATEMENT OF FACT
#1 - Page 2, the #4 of your stated REQUEST.
No reques was made for #4 because the fence is a 6 foot
view obscuringfence from the other side. The other side is where
the view is to be obscured. I am surprised this was made an
issue in this Report, as during one of my visi.ts with Planning,
and with the architect present, it was agreed that this fence is
conforming.
#2 - Top paragraph of page #3.
I am surprised this is an issue in this Report. When I,.in
person, brought the architect's revised drawing, I made an issue
that the architect surprised me with the planter protruding from
the northeast cornor of this proposed building and stated the
landscaping belongs in the area southwest of the proposed building
where the architect stated 171 sq ft is available to landscape.
That is when.staff could clearly see those three (3) parallel
parking spaces which the architect indicated as 20 feet long.
However no comment by staff about the 20 foot long parking spaces
are not conforming. The comment made - we can make an issue of
the correct place for the planter when we meet with the Board of
Adjustment. Now I am surprised. It seems, wi.th the load staff
has, that comment was overlooked.
Conclusion - To.solve this problem perceived by staff, remove
the architect's propos d planter at the northeast cornor, which
d 71
has 121 sq ft, but ads sq ft of landscaping in the available
southwest area; then,,we have plenty of space for three (3)
parallel parking spaces which are 22 feet in length, each.
#3 - Page 31 paragraph 2
Non conforming is not correct. It conforms with waiver
granted in year 1981. I am surprised that it was stated that this
was nonconforming when an issue was made of this waiver.
#4 - Page 3, paragraph 6
Staff?s comment about landscape buffer is not correct. See
facts stated in #1 - fence is a conforming fence.
-2-
#5 - Page 4, staff's answer to staff question #4
Applicant has created "own hardship." This is a retail
business and view of front needs to be more open. We are still
providing the required amount of landscaping. When, I the
applicant, provide the flowers, at this site, as I do with my
other properties, there will be more than the required landscaping.
I am surprised an issue was made of this. At various meetings,
I brought photos of other properties of mine, which show I
landscape not only more than is required, but I,landscape more
than most.
#6 - page 4, staff's answer to staff's #6 question.
"Not result in a substantial benefit or contribution to the
neighborhood." With all of the efforts many of us in the City of
Wheat 'Ridge have made to promote good development and a better
appearance to Wheat Ridge, I find the above statement by staff,
a big surprise. Also, I am somewhat offended by that statement,
especially since I provided. staff with various photos which showed
staff the beauty I add to my properties. Many property owners do
not do that.
I volunteered to add some landscaping at the southwest cornor of
7397 .:;W 44th Ave, which is identified as the northeast cornor
of Vance and 44th Ave. I told staff I would be willing to remove
some paving~to add landscaping. I al.so volunteered to,,. with a
degital camera, take photos of the cornor of Vance and 44th Ave
to help point outphat I would do there, Staff said they would do
that for me. This offer of mine is missing for the staff report.
That offer included,- put thos0hotos on a disk fot easy viewing.
I do expect corrections to be made to tIr- the wrong information on
the subject staff report. The good folks who volunteer their time
to serve on the Board of Adjustment.need the correct information
reference this site before they can make a decision reference my
request for a partial waiver of land scape requirements to I he
front only. I say front only, as when corrections are made, o this
report, it will be evident that all else is in compliance.'
This subject.request for partial waiver is the same request for
waiver I.made and received in the year of 1981. The results of
that waiver is in front of 7337 W 44th Ave, the adjacent property.
As one can see, I have add more beauty to that landscaping. During
one of my sessions with Planning, I stated I would make the same
waiver request, as I did in 1981. .The response I received from
Planning was I would not received the waiver because they are more
tough now. I was so surpeised with that anti-business comment,
I contacted a city council person. That individual was not happy
with the response I received.
I request and wish for the same waiver which received in 1981.
cerely,~
Jerry oach
~oF W"E°'so CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
m PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT
00(OaP00
TO: Board of Adjustment CASE MANAGER: Jeff I-Ert
CASE NO. & NAME: WA-05-17/Roach DATE OF MEETING: September 22, 2005
ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a partial waiver of section 26-502 (Landscaping Requirements) for
property zoned Restricted Commercial (RC).
LOCATION OF REQUEST: 7331 West 44`s Avenue
APPLICANT (S): Jerry Roach
OWNER (S): Roach Investment Limited Partnership
APPROXIMATE AREA: 12,080 (.28 acres)
PRESENT ZONING: Restricted Commercial (RC)
ENTER INTO RECORD:
(X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS
(X) ZONING ORDINANCE
Location Map
Subject Parcel
(X) DIGITAL PRESENTATION
❑
44 CL
P
V
i uaan
co
V
V
f-
r U)
r
LIU
~to Q v ~
M I
e°l
E
° IT j on °o
T
V) n
PGA n~
Board of Adjustment I
Case WA-05-17/Roach
Jurisdiction
All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case.
1. REQUEST
The property in question is located at 7331 West 44" Avenue. The property has Restricted Commercial (RC)
zoning.
The applicant, Jerry Roach, is requesting this variance as the property owner. The request is for approval of a
partial waiver of section 26-502 (Landscaping Requirements) of the Code of Laws. The proposed changes on
the property include an approximately 2,700 square foot addition to an existing commercial structure. With
these proposed changes there are required landscaping improvements in the Code of Laws. As a nonresidential
use, such improvements include:
1. 20 percent of the gross lot area must be landscaped - Sec. 26-502 (D)(3)(c)(1)
2. 1 street tree for every 30 feet of lot street frontage - Sec. 26-502 (D)(3)(a)
3. A landscaped area 10 feet in width from the edge of right-of-way on 441i Avenue - Sec. 26-502
(D)(3)(c)(2)
4. Parking lots adjacent to residentially zoned property must provide a landscape buffer 6 feet wide.
Within this landscape buffer there must be either a 6 foot high view obscuring fence, decorative wall or
landscaped hedge that is 6 feet in height - Sec. 26-502 (E)(1)
The site plan submitted is deficient from the requirements listed above in numbers 3 and 4
The property has frontage on 441i Avenue, therefore the 10 foot landscape strip is required from the edge of
right-of-way on 44" Avenue referenced above in number 3. The property adjacent to the north also has
Residential Two (R-2) zoning, and the applicant is proposing to have a parking area abutting the north property
line. Therefore the 6 foot landscape buffer referenced above in number 4 is also a requirement Effim
This case was published as a request for a partial waiver of Section 26-502 of the Code of Laws. To be precise,
the request is for approval of a waiver to the requirement for a landscaped area measuring 10 feet from the edge
of right-of-way for nonresidentially zoned property abutting 44 h Avenue and a waiver to the requirement for a
landscape buffer of 6 feet for a parking lot adjoining property zoned for low- or medium-density residential use.
Il. CASE ANALYSIS
The subject property has a number of constraints to allow for a 2,700 square foot commercial addition on site.
Most problematic related to the zoning and development code is with regards to parking and landscaping
requirements.
The proposed addition is for the purposes of retail space. The number of parking spaces required for retail in
the Code of Laws is at a rate of 1 space per 200 square feet of floor area. There is a provision in the code to
exclude 10 percent of the floor area for this requirement (for such areas as utility rooms, hallways, restrooms,
etc.). Although the addition is attached to an existing structure, it is on a freestanding parcel at this time.
Discussion on the setback implications is below. As a freestanding parcel, parking rates are determined on the
subject parcel alone in this instance. The number of required parking spaces, given the above mentioned 10
percent exclusion for a 2,700 square foot retail structure is 13, one of which being a handicapped accessible
space. 13 spaces are shown on the site plan with one handicapped space.
Board of Adjustment 2
Case WA-05-17/Roach
At least 5 of these parking spaces as shown do not conform to the city's dimensions for parking spaces. Parallel
parking spaces must have a width of 8 feet and a depth of 22 feet per the Code of Laws. There are three such
parking spaces shown on the east side of the proposed addition that do not meet the 22 foot depth requirement.
There are also two parking spaces in front of the proposed addition (south side of addition) which do not have
adequate drive aisle width, at 8 feet for angled parking.
There is angled parking existing to the east, and essentially the proposed angled parking will match what is
already on site. The existing parking at this location however is considered nonconforming. The creation of
new nonconforming angled parking spaces may not be allowed as shown.
Although this is a request for a waiver to the landscaping requirements, the parking layout and area available for
landscaping are interrelated. There may be other alternatives for placement of parking spaces to provide the
required number of spaces to be in compliance with requirements for drive aisle and size requirements, although
it appears to be difficult to do so.
The existing structure, and the proposed addition will encompass three different properties ,°(k~,xlubit - - rl.
All are currently under the same ownership. As noted above, the property in question is zoned Restricted
Commercial (RC). The properties to the west, however, are zoned Commercial One (C-1). There are
implications with the setback requirements if the applicant wishes to construct the addition with the current lot
configuration. Currently there is a lot line going through the existing building, and with the new addition under
the current lot configuration there will be another lot line going through the building. Sections 26-217 (RC
development standards) and Section 26-218 (C-1 development standards) both allow a zero setback if the
structure is constructed of masonry or nonflammable material and in accordance with the building code.
Staff has understood the intent with this development to be to consolidate two or more lots in the future to
eliminate at least one of the lot lines going through the building.
It has been noted that several of the parking spaces, as shown on the site plan submitted, do not meet the city's
regulations. The intent of the landscape waiver, at least in part, is in order to allow for more room to construct
the required number of parking spaces. Providing the required landscape buffer on the north property line, for
example, would eliminate the 8 parking spaces shown. Providing the 10 foot landscape buffer on 44`" Avenue,
for example, would eliminate the two parking spaces in front of the building. It would be more beneficial to
consider the site as a whole, as it will function as one structure with unimpeded vehicular and pedestrian access
throughout the exterior of the building and the site. The parcel for which the landscape waiver is being
requested and the parking layout is being considered is currently freestanding, and must be considered as such.
It would be more beneficial to do this analysis after the lot (or lots) have been consolidated and make a
determination then if there is a need for any waivers or variances, or if the applicant can meet all development
standards with the addition.
For variances that are denied, Sec. 26-107 of the Code of Laws states that a new application for substantially the
same development process may not be refiled for one year after denial. If this request is denied however, the
applicant may proceed with either consolidating the lot or lots, or reconfiguring the site to meet (or more closely
meet) applicable development standards. This may result in another request for a variance or waiver. It is likely
that request would not be considered substantially the same request. hi other words, it is likely that if this
request is denied and another request comes forward it may be reheard before the Board of Adjustment at any
meeting in the future.
IIl. SITE PLAN
The property is approximately 12,080 square feet, or .28 acres. The property measures 80 feet wide with a depth
of 151 feet.
The area surrounding the property in question consists of commercial uses to the south and west, single family
residential to the east and single and multi-family residential to the north.
Board of Adjustment 3
Case WA-05-17/Roach
Staff did not find any comparable variances in the immediate vicinity of this request.
IV, VARIANCE CRITERIA
Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a variance request:
Can the property in question yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be
used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located?
If the request is denied, the property may still receive a reasonable return in use. There may be alternatives
for the layout of the parking and landscaping to accommodate the proposed addition. It would be
beneficial to consider the site in its entirety after the applicant consolidates the lot or lots.
2. If the variance were granted, would it alter the essential character of the locality?
The request will have a minimal effect on the essential character of the locality. The proposed changes
are consistent with what exists on the site. The existing conditions however are nonconforming under
current regulations with regards to parking and landscaping.
3. Does the particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property
involved result in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere
inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out?
There are no unique conditions related to physical surrounding, shape or topography of the subject
property that render any portion unbuildable, or make it impossible for the applicant to construct
landscaping improvements.
4. Has the alleged difficulty or hardship been created by any person presently having an interest in the
property?
The applicant has created his own hardship by requesting a waiver to the landscape standards. When
considering the site as a freestanding parcel, however, it is very difficult for the applicant to be in
compliance with applicable landscaping and parking regulations without the need for a variance or
waivers.
5. Would the granting of the variance be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other
property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located, by, among other
things, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, substantially increasing
the congestion in public streets or increasing the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or
substantially diminishing or impairing property values within the neighborhood?
Approval of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in
the area. There will not be a decrease in the supply of light and air to adjacent property. The request
would not substantially increase the congestion in public streets, increase the danger of fire or endanger
the public safety. Property values should not be impacted as a result of this request.
6. H criteria 1 through 5 are found, then, would the granting of the variance result in a benefit or
contribution to the neighborhood or the community, as distinguished from an individual benefit on
the part of the applicant, or would granting of the variance result in a reasonable accommodation
of a person with disabilities?
The request would not result in a substantial benefit or contribution to the neighborhood distinguished
from an individual benefit on the part of the applicant.
Board of Adjustment 4
Case WA-05.17/Roach
The request would not result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities.
V. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Upon review of the above request, staff concludes that the above criteria are not supportive of the variance
request. Staff has found that there are not unique circumstances attributed to these requests that would warrant
approval of a variance. Therefore, staff recommends DENIAL for the following reasons:
1. If the request is denied, the property may still receive a reasonable return in use.
2. The request would not result in a substantial benefit or contribution to the neighborhood
distinguished from an individual benefit on the part of the applicant.
3. The site plan does not meet all applicable parking regulations in addition to landscaping
regulations. The two are interrelated; therefore it is not in the best interests of the applicant to
approve the landscaping waiver without addressing issues with the parking layout.
4. Although the subject parcel is freestanding, the site should be considered as a whole because it
functions as such being one structure with unimpeded access throughout the site and shared
parking and pedestrian areas.
5. It would be beneficial to consolidate the lot or lots and at that time address parking and
landscaping issues. If necessary, the applicant will have the ability to make another request for
a variance or waiver without adhering to the 1 year stipulation in Section 26-107 of the Code of
Laws while considering the overall functionality of the site.
Board of Adjustment
Case WA-05.17/Roach
Dt5iBKPPRKIIKttJI@[VN
'.A/AAtAK1':
AREA
ALLOWABLE WILDING AREA (TABLE 503186) = WX SF
AREA MODIFICA77016 FOR FRONTA6E INCREASE = 1017 5F
TOTAL 5F ALLOYED = lOpf7
TOTAL 5F PROP05ED = 4939 5F
PARKIN5 SUMMARY:
PARKI16 REQUIRE? : 13 SPACES
HANDICAP PARKM REQUIRED = 1 PER 25 SPACE5
PARKINS PROVIDED = 12 + I HC = 13 SPACE5
LANDSCAPE SUFPtARY:
6ROS5 LOT AREA OF NEW PROPERTY = 12107 5F
LANPWAFE PROVIDED 20% = 2360 5F
ADDITIONAL CITY AWIRDIEM
10' LANDSCAPE PROVIDED BE7YaN PARKM AND PROPERTY LIRE
TREES PROVIDED EVERY 30' AT STREET PER CITY REQUIREMENT
&A MAXINR/M 6LAZIN6 ON IEWWILDINS
EXHIBIT I
~ SITEPIAN
Sr4EtE`-MG
0
PXGrP19PA4KM3v7
O
20
5.
10
■
15
EXI5TIN67 BUILDING TO REMAIN
7240 50 FT
1 2 3 4 6 7 ~8
~mec nwaxscnoaes
i p
rw9mu i0 ~lu~I Fl~ccfGmerwx A ~ xnxx
I aewm
G.RR91t6KEGfws~NV
- romrsvr.® \
\
AW~YIfOMW51£lBt - \
45 ~ \ \
tE19FO O
W4' T4
I
NEW I STORY ~
RETAIL 4
2700 W FT
wusurn.we~
11
Rq.P '
I
1
!lWfS'L9W.K
I8 12
~ ~Da9Mn.B6tro~
AE5T 44TH AVENUE
aaxurcRrk
I.
I`I
~v
EXHIBI'T' 2
0
d
Co
Co
o •d
M
U- m
h o
1 d
~W ~
W a
f t'.
.ri
. a
>r
fi
A y
4 4
f
R
s
S ~ f
S,! f -
t
r f~
w
~ v
N
~W
F x
O
O ~
f U
1 m
r% o
rn z
1
d
1
n
~ LL
1 ~
r-f
,I z
~ N
N W
co W
Q
O
O
dc 10
~
Y
~ 4
t y
~
_ a i
~ ~ ~ ~ .
~ yti;~ t f ~..y ~ ~
a i
r$! ~ s, .ti - y ~
t
r s ~
r
v :
' ~
w
r
Y,
x ~
a
i~
Cf h r
y~ ~3 f^ .t Y t
O C,4 ,
Cd r.
- r4 -0 rn
ts 05
C* ca >
0 as
w
d~~oa.mm . v~
J 00
l W !
j _
P
d
, m
E- 0.4 r
W ,
L' b- ~i 11 V.
. t m u 'o .C O
LS G J
V f a:
W o U 8
LL
C) z a:
¢cr<o~ I I 1 Vvi
~y D O^ O
a ' O ° J I ( J 1N
cr- Z
~ 3 m w L
ui cc
T r
a 4
r
{
a
s
r to,
«a
as
a
W
C
uy o d ~
d
'
r
td
u
w
O
a
y y w m b'
e
Ei
3
y
m
q>X~~
~
.
I
Ir
p
o
aQ
R
b w
O)
~
m Ej
,
w
ry~
Ul~
'
_
S
4fd
E
m C C _
° m
:sa o
f
g•
3 y6J
~-v-
- m.oi
.
yw C m y
$pa - a8 -
1
m
m 0 0. ad ,w
:9~. C r
o u
w
i
❑
>bnv ai
~d
~
im d
m
a:d u
1
>
cd
~E
F O
CJ
T-
._'1
,
a
-
d
o' of mod
vu o
r
_
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT on September 22, 2005, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of
the Municipal Building at 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested
citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. The following
petitions shall be heard:
Case No. WA-05-17: An application filed by Jerry Roach for approval of a partial
waiver of Section 26-502 (Landscaping Requirements) for property zoned Restricted-
Commercial (RC) and located at 7331 West 44`h Avenue.
Case No. WA-05-18: An application filed by the Michael Pusateri for approval of an 8
foot rear yard setback variance from the 15 foot rear yard setback requirement for a
swimming pool on property zoned Residential-One (R-1) and located at 3201 Nelson
Street.
Kathy Field, Administrative Assistant
ATTEST:
Pamela Y. Anderson, City Clerk
To be published: Wheat Ridge Transcript
Date: September 8, 2005
~4j il ~
a--• MetroScan / Je £erson
(CO)
Owner
:Park Kerry J
Parcel :024104
Site
:7350 W 94th P1 Wheat Ridge 80033
7004 2890 0001 6396 6780
Mail
:7350 W 94th P1 Wheat Ridge Co 80033
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm
:3 Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1947 Pool:
B1dgSF:1,339 Ac:.23
MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) •
Owner
:Fatzinger Charles W
Parcel :024456
Site
:7301 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge 80033
7004 2890 0001 6396 6797
Mail
:7304 Coors Ct Arvada co 80005
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :303-423-4606
Bedrm
:2 Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1937 Pool:
B1dgSF:920 Ac:.49
* • MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) •
Owner
:Wheatridge Gardens
Parcel :024567
Site
:4415 Teller St Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfer.~ -1 6396 6803
00131
Mail
:3250 E 2nd Ave #200 Denver Co 80206
7004 2890
Use
:5112 Res,Apartment,Improved Land
Bedrm
: Bath: TotRm:8 YB:1957 Pool:
B1dgSF:30,400 Ac:1.35
* • MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) •
Owner
:Roach Investment Limited Partnership
Parcel :025155
Site
:7337 W 94th Ave Wheat Ridge 80033
.ice,.. .
Xfered 6396 6810
0001
Mail
:6545 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80033
7004 2890
Use
:2112 Com,Improved Land
-421-3107
Bedrm:
Bath: TotRm:l YB:1953 Pool:
B1dgSF:3,128 Ac:.21
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) •
Owner
:Lonardo Pasquale
Parcel :025517
Site
:7330 W 44th Pl Wheat Ridge 80033
7004 2890 0001 6396 6827
Mail
:4637 Saulsbury St Wheat Ridge Co 80033
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :303-940-7712
Bedrm:
3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1960 Pool:
B1dgSF:992 Ac:.25
MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Lonardo Piasquale
Parcel :025517
Site
:7330 W 94th ) Ridge 80033
Xfered :11/06/1979
Mail
:4637 Saulsbv- Wheat Ridge Cc 80033
Price
Use
:1112 R9-s~'Improved L4and
Phone :303-940-7712
Bedrm:
4 ="tath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1960 Pool:
B1dgSF:864 Ac:.25
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) •
Owner
:Roar Investment Limited Partnership
Parcel :025539
Site
:7393` 4t-,AvE'"Wfieat Ridge 80033
Xfered :12/31/1997
Mail
:6Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80033
Price
Use
:2112 Com,Imp ved Land
Phone :303-421-3107
Bedrm:
Bath: TotRm:l YB:1957 Pool:
B1dgSF:4,331 Ac:.57
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Roach Investment Limited Partnership
Parcel :025805
Site
:7331 44th Ave Whea edge 80033
Xfered :12/31/1997
Mail
:6545 W 9 A eRidge Co 80033
Price
Use
:1111--Vaaarlt, sidential
Phone :303-421-3107
Bedrm:
Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool:
B1dgSF: Ac:.29
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) •
Owner
:Flieder John R
Parcel :026124
Site
:7250 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge 80033
7004 2890 0001 6396 6834
Mail
:4833 S Robb St Littleton Cc 80127
Use
:5178-Misc,Residential,Mixed Use Land
Phone
Bedrm:
Bath: TotRm:2 YB:1957 Pool:
B1dgSF:4,684 Ac:.52
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Kajewski Steve
Parcel :038580
Site
:4416 Upham St Wheat Ridge 80033
..r A •nR/?n/1992
Mail
:PO Box 21 Louisville co 80027
7004 2890 0001 6396 6858
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
one
Bedrm:
4 Bath:3.00 TotRm: YB:1971 Pool:
B1dgSF:1,920 Ac:.29
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Stancoll Llc
Parcel :109809
Site
:7300 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfarort °n"'^-.,.^,.-
Mail
:1200 17th St #3000 Denver Cc 80202
7004 2890 0001 6396 6841
Use
:2112 Com,Improved Land
e
Bedrm:
Bath: TotRm:l YB:1952 Pool:
B1dgSF:1,841,~~c C.22
/71
Et 9
Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representatimis:yi o -
or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report l-~l ,
: MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) •
Owner
:Karl
Milloie
Parcel :195R7s
6396 6865
Site
:7340
W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge 80033
7004 2890 0001
Mail
:7340
W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80033
Use
:2112
Com,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
Bath: TotRm:l YB:1967 Pool:
B1dgSF:34,800 Ac:4.16
Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations
or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report.
7500 West 29th Avenue
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033
303/235-2846 Fax: 303/235-2857
The City of
Wheat
Ridge
September 8, 2005
Dear Property Owner:
This is to inform you of Case No. WA-05-17 which is a request for approval of a partial
waiver of Section 26-502 (Landscaping Requirements) for property zoned Restricted-
Commercial (RC) and located at 7331 West 44th Avenue. This case will heard by the
Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment in the Council Chambers of the Municipal
Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue on September 22, 2005, at 7:30 p.m.
As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing
and/or submit written comments.
If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning
Division at 303-235-2846. Thank you.
Planning Division.
% -ci-eng-001\users\kfield\Kathy\BOA\pubnotice\2005\wa05l7.wpd
Kerry Park Charles Fatzinger Gardens Wheatridge
7350 W 44th PI 7304 Coors Ct 3250 E 2nd Ave #200
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Arvada, CO 80005 Denver, CO 80206
Roach Investment Limited Partnership
Rlllp
6545 W 44th Ave
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Pasquale Lonardo & Elfina Aka Lonardo
4637 Saulsbury St
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Pasquale Lonardo a Aka Lonardo
4637 S St
W~l eaYRidRidg geZ'~80033
Roach vestment Li Partnership
Rlllp
65451W 44 e
Whea dge, CO 033
ach Investment Limited Partnership
Rlllp
6545 W 4ti Ave
WIT idge, CO 80033
John Flieder & Marsha Flieder
4833 S Robb St
Littleton, CO 80127
Steve Kajewski Stancoll Llc Milloie Karl
PO Box 21 1200 17th St 43000 7340 W 44th Ave
Louisville, CO 80027 Denver, CO 80202 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
* Search Parameters
* Jefferson (CO)
* 9/6/2005
* 11:28 AM
Parcel
Number ...12
39
231
14
001
39
231
14
002
39
231
14
003
39
231
14
004
39
231
14
005
39
231
14
006
39
231
14
007
39
234
00
006
39
234
00
096
39
234
03
015
39
231
14
008
12-002
13-001
; 13-031
19.54')
115.01'
14-009
N
14-039
- -
I
H PL
1
(124.80')
(156.20')
.
j
i
N
j
14-008
C
14-040
j
a
14-001
~
j
i
(206
71'
14-002
o
°
(126.50')
154.50'
.
j
N
(82.20') v
66.80'
4
0
j
-00
-
-005
L
14-007
0 12-007
14-004.
a 14-00
t t>s
ar2
ge
0
1
i
~
-
°
I
i
103.80'
8 20'
I
00'
64
00'
81
00'
77
00'
303.2011
)
80.
.
.
.
C -2 /
L-
00-006
03-015
03-001
04-001
0
I
v, i II
)1
N
N
O
a
00-006 03-015 03-001
co Im
1136.70'1 029.30"
L-
71
N
00-096
A
O
0
0
00-029
00-031
(310.20')
--3T6.2o7-
00-039
(310.51'
00-040
(310 52'1
00-029
O
03-015 0
O
03-002
~
136.50')
(129.00')
j
'
I
03-014
° 03-003
i
136.20'
(129.00')
.
03-013 'oqo
03-004 C
I
I
(136.00')
(128.70')
I
03-012
03-005
i
.
1'.%20'
I
~
I
0
03-011 n
0
03-006
~
I
ti
(128.31')
.
j
03-010 a
03-007 c~
!
~
I
128.01)
( 50.)
I
03-009 °
o
„ 03-008 m
99-002
00-028
i
'I
120.20')
i
I
00-032
(299.30')
00-038 p
0
(170.31')
00-037
Square Footage
Existing 7240
Addition 2700
Total Proposed 9940
Parking
10% exclusion 8946
Parking Required
44.73
(1/200 - 10%)
Existing Striped Parking
13 observed
(per photos)
Landscaping, existing (approximate)
Square footage Percentage of total
7331 W 44th
1300
500 0.148674
7337 W 44th
1600 0.167715
Total (2 east lots)
3400
7393 W 44th 12000 0.535954
Total (all three lots) 15400 0.349706
Total square footage (all 3 lots) 44037
o.fp cr
2 73 J-~ uv~
4/4 A/ 4;? -S r- I-). PC
Li+sr 1&x16'/ - ISI &
/VcRrm (.,k 76 yad
/F,4:5 T
6r- di-vc~- 3x7
~16a r/+-
I 5&,UG 3X37
1 f
6LOC. 3 x37
~5 a S X ~
rf o
Rc(C 141R/-U a~l~
T
X -4
O
W OOC
W G
N N
W
N S
mD
W
V cp
W
tT G
y S
0)
f
f a
0 W
f 0
O
N
= a
O O
CD 0°
O
O N
cn
C cn
N
K al
o °
w ~
N N
W
N S
° D
GI cD
V
• 3
~(D
6 C
LA S
f~D fD
.~i
f
Fa
n A
f n
N O
y O
C
O O-
N O
OD
b °
O 12
C N
N
N
W ~
IN
?I-
N
h
~ G
b
6
fi
:
7k
v ~
S
J
V
i
~
rl
V
G
w
O
d
N
0
r~l
V ~
p
-a
-n
, :2
W1
m
1~
;o
0
<
>
®
C
r
z
®
J
J
~1
O O O
OU
~
T
W :a" W
/
~
G7
y
N N N
M
m
S?o
p
00 00 00
N cn?
-f
n
m
O
J
N
J
8
~2
W
❑
p
-a
-n
Q3
~
<
>
®
m
z
R
r
z
/
_
_
O
o0
0
Z
_
W W
W
N N
N
m
(A (A
CA
m
sto
p
N
m
Z
TI
N
N
C
j
c
o 00
01~
~
-n
CO
n
1
3
J
0
m
O
-rh-
N
-N
U
~
11
1331- Jl W. li`fn fwt~
• I
to
cr~snt. tots t 3~ -_a Hea~~ _
' f
! t Sol. w, el e`tca YMA^ • 3t bl #h o{
'
-
'
! ~ - \ots )re cep. wo..la_.._. heed 2413 of LS _
-
(a.w t?
'13,93 CZonwa R•2)
LbtS LS vn .._rt~ of
lA ro_ _ l~Itix sz, ( 04-80 ~b of _Ls -
Lo gZ LS , ykwwbLe Zb/ e-f
-
tad+s c I~~z 5a~ra s -
- - - i-
-
ot~.
1r nntwed ust aria - ~w.t ,r I~Y,.e
_
• I
I Ner•l'~r` oc a aS~ ~
_
_ _
VJQA. d• u~nc~ toI us strip aaja~dr~ k~ 406-
3
i
- F
I
baS<~ ern lob o of bl a,~ 45~ _ ~pt~,t 1
v -
_ ~ ~
aCC Ct rt~+
w h aeon a to is-
on~~W rovrot\t ~ta„aNas
; :
stops--
-
f7rl,
studios
ARCHITECTURE
w+DSM AFCHREMURE
OEVELOPNEW CONSOLING
TRANSMITTAL
D a t e: 7-21-05
T o : Meredith Reckert, AICP
Project: 7331 W.44"St.
Attached: 1 revised site plan
From: Eric Scholz p z
Via: Mail
Action:
Hello Meredith,
Attached you will find a revised site plan for the project at 7331 W. 44". We made some minor changes to the site plan
to meet Fire Department Requirements. Please note that our other site calculations, parking and square footage stayed
basically the same.
Please call if you need further information,
Thanks,
Eric Scholz
Form Studios, Inc
FORM Studios Incorporated, 4439 North Broadway, Ste D, Boulder CO 80304 PHONE Ivan: 303-323-1923 FAX: 303-442-1556 EMAIL: Eric@4 rmstudios.hirr
Z-Z 11
X33
z
Z~
CJ
7 r
~J Si?r y~[~. ~&\~a~ chi,. ---~~J~~ v .
-1331
. Pad
lS b~{{e,< n~ N
J tD
' Con . 'Pla~~
July 20,2005
Douglas Saba, Fire Marshall
Wheat Ridge Fire Protection District
3880 Upham Street
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80034
303-403-5900
!~A C°3,
RE: 7331 W. 44" Ave, addition, review dated 7-18-05
Dear Mr. Saba,
~ GAY✓~
f'Tif 1,
studios
ARCHITECTURE
wDs EnaGxne K
DMOPMFM CONSMMG
Attached you will find responses to your comments that I hope you find now comply with your requirements:
1. The attached siteplan illustrate compliance to your listed requirements.
2. See the attached specifications sheets for all proposed gas or electric appliances.
3. The twenty foot wide drive aisle is now shown on the east side of the building. As you can see, the parking is still
shown. The extra width came from the landscaped area that has been shifted to the northeast.
4. Please note the required turning radius shown on the attached siteplan.
5. The north end of the building will contain a sign that states : FIRE LANE - NO PARKING. For the east side of the
building, we felt that since the required 20'-0" drive aisle is provided, the parking could remain and a sign would not be
required here.
6. Acknowledged, and communicated' to the contractor.
7. The contractor shall keep a set of approved plans and permits on-site at all times.
8. The Owner will deliver a set of stamped engineered plans that illustrate properly designed structure for all roof loads.
9. The Contractor will notify the Fire District of all inspections pending.
10. Acknowledged, and communicated to the Contractor.
11. Acknowledged, and communicated to the Owner.
12. Please note the addition of (3) 6" x 4'-0" concrete filled steel bollards on the attached siteplan.
13. Acknowledged, and communicated to the Owner.
14. Acknowledged, and communicated to the Contractor.
15. Acknowledged, and communicated to the Contractor.
16. Acknowledged, and communicated to the Owner.
17. Acknowledged, and communicated to the Owner.
If you have any remaining concerns, feel free to contact me or Peter Carey at the same phone number.
Sincerely,
Eric Scholz, Architect
Form Studios, Inc.
303-323-1923
FORM Studios, Inc., 4439 N. Broadway, Ste D, Boulder, CO 80304 PHONE/ van: 303-323-1923 FAX: 303-442-1556 EMAIL: Eric@formstudios.biz
4~
0 TRAMN s
Model
Number
Description
Y S C 036 A 3 R L A C 0 0 0 C 1 0 0 0 1 A 1
1 2 3 4,5,6 7 8 9 10 1112,1314 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
DIGIT 1 - Unit Function
Y = DX Cooling, Gas Heat
DIGIT 2 - Efficiency
S = Standard Efficiency
H = High Efficiency
DIGITS-Airflow
C = Convertible
DIGITS 4A6 - Nominal Gross Cooling
Capacity (MBh)
036 = 3 Ton
048 = 4 Ton
060 = 5 Ton
072 = 6 Ton
090 = T/2 Ton, Single Compressor
092 = 7% Ton, Dual Compressors
102 = 8y2 Ton
120= 10 Ton
DIGIT 7 - Major Design Sequence
A = First
DIGITS- Unit Voltage
1 = 208-230/60/1
3 = 208-230/60/3
4 = 460/60/3
W= 575/60/3
K = 380/60/3
DIGIT 9 - Unit Controls
E = Electromechanical
R = ReliaTelt. Microprocessor
DIGIT 14 - Fresh Air Selection
0 = No Fresh Air
A= Manual Outside Air Damper 0-50%
B = Motorized Outside Air Damper 0-50%
C = Economizer, Dry Bulb 0-100%
without Barometric Relief
D = Economizer, Dry Bulb 0-100%
with Barometric Relief
E = Economizer, Reference Enthalpy
0-100% without Barometric Relief
F = Economizer, Reference Enthalpy
0-100% with Barometric Relief
G = Economizer, Comparative Enthalpy
0-100% without Barometric Relief
H = Economizer, Comparative Enthalpy
0-100% with Barometric Relief
DIGIT 15- Supply Tan/Drive, Type/Motor
0 = Standard Drive
1 = Oversized Motor
2 = Optional Belt Drive Motor
DIGIT 16-Hinged Service AccessFilrers
0 = Standard Panels/Standard Filters
A = Hinged Access Panels/Standard Filters
B = Standard Panels/2" Pleated Filters
C = Hinged Access Fai ls2" Pleated Filters
DIGIT 17-Condenser Coil Protection
0 = Standard Coil
1 = Standard Coil with Hail Guard
2 = Black Epoxy Pre-Coated Condenser
Coil
3 = Black Epoxy Pre-Coated Condenser
Coil with Hail Guard
DIGIT 20 - Convenience Outlet
0 = No Convenience Outlet
A = Unpowered Convenience Outlet
B = Powered Convenience Outlet
(3 phase only)
DIGIT 21-Communications Options
0 = No Communications Interface
1 = Trans Communications Interface
2 = Will Communications Interface
3 = Novar2024 Controls
4 = Novar 3051 Controls
DIGIT 22 - Refrigeration System Option
0 = Standard Refrigeration System
A= Thermal Expansion Valve (TXV)
B = Dehumidification (Hot Gas Reheat Coil)
DIGIT23 - Refrgeration Controls
0 = No Refrigeration Control
1 = High Pressure Control
2 = Frostat
3 = Crankcase Heater
4 = High Pressure Control and Frostat
5 = High Pressure Control and Crankcase
Heater
6 = Frostat and Crankcase Heater
7 = High Pressure Control, Frostat and
Crankcase Heater
DIGI7-24 - Smoke Detector
0 = No Smoke Detector
A = Return Air Smoke Detector
B = Supply Air Smoke Detector
C = Supply and Return Air Smoke
Detectors
DIGIT 10 - Heating Capacity
L = Low
M= Medium
H = High
X = Low, Stainless Steel Heat Exchanger
Y = Medium, Stainless Steel Heat
Exchanger
Z = High, Stainless Steel Heat Exchanger
DIGIT 11 - Minor Design Sequence
A = First Sequence
DIGITS 12, 13 - Service Sequence
= Factory Assigned
DIGIT 1S -Through the Base Provisions
0 = NoThrough the Base Provisions
A = Through the Base Electric
B = Through the Base Gas Piping
C = Through the Base Electric and Gas
Piping
DIGIT 19 - Disconnect/Circuit Breaker/
Phase Monitor (3 phase only)
0 = No Disconnect/NoCircuit Breaker/No
Phase Monitor
1 = Unit Mounted Non-Fused Disconnect
2 = Unit Mounted Circuit Breaker
3 = Phase Monitor
4 = Phase Monitor & Non-Fused
Disconnect Switch
5 = Phase Monitor & Circuit Breaker
DIGIT25 - Monitoring Controls
0 = No Monitoring Control
1 = Clogged Filter Switch
2 = Fan Failure Switch
3 = DischargeAir Sensing Tube
4 = Clogged Filter Switch and Fan Fail
Switch
5 = Clogged Filter Switch and Discharge
Air SensingTube
6 = Fan Fail Switch and Discharge Air
SensingTube
7 = Clogged Filter and Fan Fail Switches
and Discharge Air SensingTube
8 = Novar Return Air Sensor
Example:
Model numberYSC036A3R1.A**0000C10001 At Odescribes a unitwith the following character istica. DXCOolingwith natural gas heating, 3 ton nominal cooling capacity, 208-23016013powersupply,
ReliaTeP controls, low heat model. 0-100% dry bulb economizerwitholn barometric relief, standard ectdrive motor, standard access panels, standard condenser coil with no coil protection,
through the base electric and gas access, non-fused disconnect, no convenience outlet or communications interface, standard refrigeration coil. high pressure control, return air smoke detec[onand
clogged filter switch.
14 RT-PR0006-EN
0 TRANE®
General ( m ` o s)
Data Standard Efficiency
Table GD-1 - General Data
3 Ton Convertible Units
47on Con
vertible Units
YSOD36AI
YSC036A3, A4, AW
YSC04841
YSC048A3, A4, AW
Cooling Performance'
Gross Cooling Capacity
37,400
37p00
50,300
49,200
SEER2
10.5
10.7
10.1
10.0
Nominal CFM/ARI Rated CFM
1,200/1,200
1,200/1,200
11600/1,600
1,600/1,600
ARI Net Cooling Capacity
36,000
36,000
48,000
47,000
System Power(KtM
3.91
3.79
5.28
5.40
-Heating Models
Lm
Medium
High
LaN
Medium
High
low Medium
High
law
Medium
High
Headng Input(etu)
60,000
80,000
120,000
60,000
80,000
120,000
60,000 80,000
120,000
60,000
80,000
120,000
Heating Output(Btu)
47,000
63,000
95,000
48,000
64,000
96,000
47,000 63,000
95,000
48,000
64,000
96,000
ARKW
80
80
80
81
81
81
80 80
80
81
81
81
Steady State EfficiencyN
80
80
80
81
81
81
80 80
80
81
81
81
No. Bunters
2
2
3
2
2
3
2 2
3
2
2
3
No. Stages
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
Gas Supply Line Pressure
Natural (minimum/maximum)
4.5/14.0
4.5/14.0
4.5/14.0
4
.5/14.0
LP(minimumhnaAmum)
10.0114.0
10.0/14.0
10.0/14.0
10.0/14.0
Gas Connection Pipe Sim (in.)
12
12
12
12
12
12
12 12
12
12
12
12
Compressor
rr.,.,e
1Mermert
c
144ert
oedc
1/Scroll
1/Scroll
Tube Sin(in.)OD
0.3125
0.3125
0.3125
0.3125
Face Area (sq ft)
719
719
6.17
9.59
Rows/FPI
2/17
2117
2/17
1/17
Indoor Coil-Type
Lanced
Lanced
Lanced
Lanced
Tube Size (in.)
0.3125
0.3125
0.3125
3125
Face Area (sq ft)
5.67
5.67
6.68
6.17
Rows/FPI
2116
2116
3/16
3/16
Refrigerant Control
Short Orifice
Short Orifice
Short Orifice
Short Orifice
Drain Connection NolSize(in.)
1Pl NPT
1P NPT
IA/4 NPT
1P/c NPf
No Used/Diameter(in.)
1/22
122
122
122
DriveType/No. Speeds
Direct/1
DirecV1
Direct/1
DirecUl
CfM
2,550
2,550
2,850
3,610
No. Motors/HP
1/0.20
110.20
1/0.33
1/0.33
M to RPM
1,075
1,075
1{075
1,075
Direct Ddvetndco Fan Type
FC Centrifugal
FC Centrifugal
PC Centrfugal
FCCentnfugal
No. Used/Diameter(io.)
1/10 x 10
1/10 x 10
1111 x 11
1/11 x 11
DwaTypeMo. Speeds
DirecU2
Direct/2
Direct/2
DimcU2
No. Motors
1
1
1
1
Motor HP(Standard/Overseed)
0.3310.50
0.33/0.50
0.60/0.80
0.60/0.80
Motor RPM(StandanHOversaed)
95mi'low
93011,100°
1,000/1,100
1,00011,100
Motor Frame Size(Standard/Oversized)
48/48
48/48
48/48
48/48
M
RT-PR0006-EN 16
I
Performance
Data
Table PD -2 - Gross Cooling Capacities (MBH) 4 Ton Single Phase YSCO46AI
AmbientTemperabtre (F)
85 95 105 115
Dry Entering Wet Bulb (F)
rv,n WW11, et 67 71 At 67 73 61 67 73 61 67 73
Airflow
(F)
MN SHC NHi 5HC NBi SHC
V9SHC wHi SHC NHi SFiC
Iv1Eti SHC NHH SHC NHH SHC
N1Efi SHC MH 94C NHH SHC
75
45.5 38.7 52A 30.0 56A 20.1
41.6 36.6 49.0 28.3 54.4 18.9
376 34.5 44.4 26.7 51.8 175
33.5 32.3 39.8 24.5 48.0 15.8
1410
80
46.5 46.5 52.5 37.6 56.8 28.1
43.2 43.2 49.1 35.9 54.8 26.7
39.9 39.9 44.6 33.8 52.0 25.2
36.5 36.5 401 31.6 48.2 23A
85
50.3 50.3 53.0 45.1 57.4 34.9
47.0 47.0 49.7 43.7 55.0 33.9
43.6 43.6 45.3 41.6 52.2 32.8
40.2 40.2 41.0 39.5 48.3 31.0
90
53.3 53.3 53.8 52.5 57.7 41.1
50.8 50.8 50.8 50.8 55.5 41.0
47.5 47.5 47.5 47.5 52.5 40.1
44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 48.6 38.6
75
46.8 41.3 53.1 31.3 56.9 20.5
42.7 39.1 50.1 29.7 55.0 19.2
38.7 370 45.4 27.5 52A 17.9
34.4 34.4 40.8 25A 48.9 16.3
80
48.7 48.7 53.4 39.5 57.5 28.9
45.2 45.2 50.3 38.2 55A 27.8
412 41.8 45.7 36.0 52.7 263
38.2 38.2 41.1 33.9 49.1 24.7
1600
85
52.2 52.2 53.9 475 58.1 36.1
49.3 49.3 51.0 46.7 55.7 35.3
45.7 45.7 46.7 44.7 52.9 34.5
42.1 42.1 42.1 42.1 49.2 33.0
90
54.9 54.9 54.9 54.9 56.4 42.8
52.7 52.7 52.7 52.7 56.2 42.9
49.8 49.8 49.8 49.8 53.3 42.5
46.2 46.2 46.2 46.2 49.7 41.3
75
48.1 43.8 53.6 32.5 573 20.8
43.8 41.6 50.8 31.1 55.5 19.6
39.8 39.5 46.3 29.0 52.9 18.2
35.8 35.8 41.5 26.7 49.6 16.7
80
50.5 50.5 54.0 41.2 58,0 29.6
47.1 47.1 51.1 40.3 55.9 29.0
43.4 43.4 46.7 38.2 53.2 274
39.8 39.8 42.0 36.0 49.7 25.8
1760
85
53.6 53.6 54.8 49.8 68.6 37.1
51.1 51.1 52.0 49.4 56.3 36.6
477 47.7 48.1 47.9 53.5 36.1
43.9 43.9 43.9 43.9 49.9 34.9
90
56.1 56.1 56.1 56.1 59.0 44.2
54.2 54.2 54.1 54.1 56.9 44.8
51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 54.1 44.7
48.2 48.2 48.2 48.2 50.5 43.9
75
49.1 46.3 54.2 33.5 577 21.2
44,9 44.0 51.5 32.4 55.9 20.0
40.7 40.7 47.1 30.4 53.3 18.6
370 370 42.2 28.1 50.1 170
80
51.9 51.9 54.6 42.7 58A 30.1
48.8 48.8 51.8 42.2 56.3 30.2
45.0 45.0 47.7 40.4 53.7 28.5
41.2 41.2 42.9 38.2 50.3 26.9
1920
85
54.7 54.7 55.5 51.8 59.1 38.1
52.5 52.5 52.9 51.8 56.8 37.8
49.4 49.4 49.4 49.4 54.1 37.6
45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 50.5 36.6
90
57.1 571 571 57.1 59A 45.6
55.3 55.3 55.3 55.3 574 46.4
52.8 52.8 52.8 52.8 50.7 46.7
49.8 49.8 49.8 49.8 51.3 46.2
1. All capacities shown are grossand have not considered indoor-fan heat. To obtain NET cooling capacity subtract indoorfan heat. For indoorfan matformula, refer to appropriateairflow
o
tablenctes. I
2 MBH= Total Gross Capaciry
3 SHC=Sensible Heat Capaciry
Table PD-3 - Gross Cooling Capacities (MBH) 4 Ton Three Phase YSC04BA3, A4, AW
AmbientTemperature (F)
85 95 105 115
Dry
Entering Wat Bulb (F)
CFM
Bulb
61 67 73
61 57 73
51 b/ /3
bl b/ /4
Airflow
(F(
N16i SHC NHi SHC NHi SIC
MBH SHC MN SHC AN SIFE
MHH SIC wHH SHC NW SHC
MBH SHC VW SHC M3H SHC
75
44.8 38.6 51A 29.8 56.1 20.1
41.0 36.6 48.2 28.2 53.7 18.9
37.3 34.7 44.2 26A 50.8 176
33.4 32.7 39.6 25.2 47.1 16.0
80
46.0 46.0 51.6 37.4 56.5 279
42.9 42.9 48.3 35.8 50.0 26.6
39.7 39.7 44.4 34.0 51.0 25.2
36.4 36.4 40.0 32.0 472 23.6
1440
85
49.6 49.6 52.0 44.8 56.7 34.8
46.8 46.8 48.9 43.6 54,2 34.0
43.6 43.6 45.1 41.8 51.2 32.7
40.3 40.3 41.0 39.8 474 31.1
90
52.5 52.5 52.9 52.2 57.2 41.6
50.2 50.2 50.1 50.1 54.6 41.1
47.2 47.2 47.2 472 515 40.1
43.9 43.9 43.9 43.9 47.7 38.6
75
46.1 41.1 52.1 31.1 56.7 20.5
42.1 39.0 49.1 29.6 54.4 19.3
38.3 37.1 45.1 278 51.5 18.0
34.3 343 40.6 25.7 47.9 16.5
80
48.1 48.1 52.4 39.3 57.2 29.0
44.9 44.9 49.2 379 54.7 227
41.5 41.5 45.4 36.2 51.7 26.3
38.1 38.1 41.0 34.2 48.0 24,8
1600
95
51.4 51.4 63.0 47.3 577 36.7
48.7 48.7 50.0 46.4 55.0 35.5
45.6 45.6 46.3 44.8 51.9 34.6
42.1 42.1 42.1 42.1 48.2 33.0
90
54.2 54.2 54.2 54.2 58.0 43.5
51.9 51.9 51.9 51.9 55.4 43.2
49.1 49.1 49.1 49.1 52.3 42.5
45.9 45.9 45.9 45.9 48.7 41.3
75
472 43.5 52.8 32.3 573 20.9
43.3 41.5 49.8 30.9 54.9 19.7
39.1 39.1 45.8 29.1 52.0 18.3
35.6 35.6 41.3 271 48.5 16.8
80
49.7 49.7 53.1 41.0 57.8 30.1
46.7 46.7 50.1 40.0 55.3 28.8
43.3 43.3 46.2 38.3 52.3 27A
39.7 39.7 41.8 36.3 48.7 25.9
1760
85
52.8 52.8 53.8 49.7 58.1 377
50.3 50.3 51.0 49.1 55.6 37.0
47.2 47.2 47.2 472 52.5 36.1
43.7 43.7 43.7 43.7 48.9 34.9
90
55.5 55.5 55.5 55.5 58.7 45.3
53.4 53.4 53A 53A 56.1 45.2
50.7 50.7 50.7 50.7 53.1 44.7
476 47.6 47.6 47.6 49.5 43.8
75
48.2 45.8 53.3 33.4 57.8 21.3
44,4 43.8 50.4 32.1 55.4 20.0
40.3 40.3 46.5 30A 52.5 18.6
36.6 36.6 41.9 28.3 49.0 172
80
51.0 51.0 63.7 42.7 58.3 31.1
48.1 48.1 50.7 41.9 55.7 29.6
44.7 44.7 47.0 40.3 52.8 28.4
41.1 41.1 42.6 38.3 49.2 26.9
1920
85
53.9 53.9 54.6 51.8 58.6 38.7
51.6 51.6 51.9 51.5 56.2 384
48.6 48.6 48.6 48.6 53.1 37.7
45.2 45.2 45.2 45.2 49.4 36.6
90
56.6 56.6 56.6 56.6 59.3 47.0
546 54.6 54.5 54.5 56.8 471
52.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 53.8 46.9
49.0 49.0 49.0 49.0 50.3 46.1
n..[ :
1 All capacities shown are gross and have not considered indoor fan heat. To obtain NET cooling capacity subtract indoor fan heat For indoor fan heat formula, refer to appropriate airflow
tablenotes.
2 MBH=Total Gross Capaciry
a SHC=Sensible Heat Capacryy
RT-PR0006-EN
29
N 40 0 40 Feet
A
E CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION
Community Development Department
0 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Phone (303) 235-2846
(Please print or type all information)
C
Address 46LF5- Avr_ Phon 6' Bc/3
State Co Zip A0~~3 F 0 0-7//A
(Zlme-o -rrVVESr~V1C-/V Li atTEO
Owner PA v4A-sr/TpAddress Phone
City State Zip Fax
n ~
Contact JP R y/ / S a 4c 1-f Address 65CJ_ • 4 ~ ut- Phone S 6- 8
City W s.t A *:y - 14 r 0f--a State L o Zip--a-Q336 Fax B
(The person listed as contact will be contacted to answer questions regarding this application, provide additional information when necessary, post
public hearing signs, will receive a copy of the staff report prior to Public Hearing, and shall be responsible for forwarding all verbal and written
communication to applicant and owner.)
Location of request (address): `j 33 1 cJ • Ll r CT U l=
Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request):
Application submittal requirements on reverse side
❑ Change of zone or zone conditions
❑ Special Use Permit
❑ Consolidation Plat
❑ Subdivision: Minor (5 lots or less)
❑ Flood Plain Special Exception
❑ Subdivision: Major (More than 5 lots)
❑ Lot Line Adjustment
❑ Right of Way Vacation
❑ Planned Building Group
❑ Temporary Use, Building, Sign
❑ Site Development Plan approval
[XVariance/Waiver (from Section )
❑ Other:
Detailed description of request:
Required information:
Assessors Parcel Number: O S 8 Dfl-
Current Zoning: j~z G
Current Use: UI+4f qv ( L. T
Size of Lot (acres or square footage): 1 ~1 y8 G
Proposed Zoning: _
Proposed Use: A A J=g%S4_
I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge
and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above,
without whose consent the requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners
must submit power-of-attorney from the owner which appLQy_ed of this action on his behalf.
Signature of Applicant.
I A.
h'tsp day of G 20 l~`J
NA, OUBOG Public - V `
pF COLO~P y commission expires CJL1(f>`(/(v
To be filled out by staff:
Date received
Comp Plan Desig.
Related Case No.
4N Commission,EApires•,Wt81
°o eat
Fee$ ~ Rec ipt No.
Zoning
Pre-App Mtg. Date
Case No. vV4"66--/7
Quarter Section Map
Case Manager
Property appraisal system
Previous 6 OF 11 Next
Page 1 of 2
Printer Friendly Page
Sch:025805 Parcel ID:39-231-14-005 Status:Active Property Type:Vacant Land
Property Address 07331 W 44TH AVE
WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033
Mailing Address: 06545 W 44TH AVE
WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 4710
Owner Name
ROACH INVESTMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
RLLLP
Area:2
Neighborhood: 2405 BARTHS, COULEHAN GRANGE, WHEAT RIDGE AREA
Subdivision Name: 169400 COULE
HAN GRANGE
Block Lot Key Section Township Range
QuazterSection Land Sgfr
004 E 007 23 3 69
0 12066
=E]❑===
Total 12066
Sale Date Sale Amount Deed Type
Reception
08-20-1976 36,000 ~
CONVER02
OS-31-1978 0~
80074667
09-30-1980 69,000 ~
CONVEROI
12-31-1997 0 Quit Claim Deed
F0532782
Assessor Parcel Maps associated with Schedule:
map39-231.Ddf.
Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF's.
Location Map/Additional Information.
Send mail to assessor@coJefferson.co.us with questions or comments about this Web site.
Copyright @ 2005, Jefferson County, Colomdo. All rights reserved.
A Map of How to Get to Our Office
Web site information current through: 09-17-2005
Version 3.5.0 - Release Date: SEPTEMBER 2005
httD://ww14.co.iefferson.co.us/ats/diSDIavizeneral.do?sch=025805&offset=5 9122/2005
Hme
Properly; Rarutrds Gerreral
In€ormation -
Maps
Property appraisal system
Maps
Previous 7 OF 11 Next
Page 1 of 2
Printer Friendly Page
Sch:025155 Parcel ID:39-231-14-004 Status:Active Property Type:Commercial
Property Address 07337 W 44TH AVE
WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033
Mailing Address: 06545 W 44TH AV
WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 4710
Owner Name
RLLLP
ROACH INVESTMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Area:2
Neighborhood: 2405 BARTHS, COULEHAN GRANGE, WHEAT RIDGE AREA
Subdivision Name: 169400 COULEHAN GRANGE
Block Lot Key Section Township Range QuarterSection Land Sgft
004 E] 008 23 33 69 0 9540
Total 9540
Sale Date Sale Amount Deed Type Reception
02-O1-1977 40,000 0 CONVER02
OS-31-1978 0~ 80076113
09-30-1980 86,000 ~ CONVEROI
12-31-1997 0 Quit Claim Deed F0532782
Assessor Pazcel Maps associated with Schedule:
map39-231.pdf.
Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF's.
Location Map/Additional Information.
Send mail to assessor@co.iefferson.co.us with questions or comments about this Web site.
Copyright @ 2005, Jefferson County, Colorado. All rights reserved.
A Map of How to Get to Our Office
Web site information current through: 09-17-2005
Version 3.5.0 - Release Date: SEPTEMBER 2005
httD://wwl4.co.iefferson.co.us/ats/disi)lavizeneral.do?sch=025155&offset=6 9/22/2005
Hang -
Property;P.aaJrds In formation ttanerall
Property appraisal system
02515511Pronertv Address: 07337 W 44TH A
Page L of 1
NUMBER BUILT GRADE FLOOR ISTRUCTURE TYPE IIUNITSI QFr JISQFr IJARE
-7 1953 Average Strip Shopping CenterF~ 3128 I0 954C
Send mail to assessor@co.ieffzrson.co.us with questions or comments about this Web site.
Copyright @ 2005, Jefferson County, Colorado. All rights reserved.
A Map of How to Get to Our Office
Web site information current through: 09-17-2005
Version 3.5.0 - Release Date: SEPTEMBER 2005
htti):Hwwl4.co.iefferson.co.us/ats/commercialinventorv.do?sch=025155 9/22/2005
HoJ
PromrtY f ocords Commercial
InYen~ijr~r
Maps
Previous 7 OF 11 Next
Property appraisal system
Previous 10 OF 11 Next
Page 1 of 1
IISch:025539 Parcel ID:39-231-14-003 Status:Active Property Type:Commerciall I
W 44TH AVE
II IIWHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 II
Wailing Address:1106545 W 44TH AVE II
11 IIWHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 471011
Name
H INVESTMENT LIMITED
:2
Neighborhood: 2405 BARTHS, COULEHAN GRANGE, WHEAT RIDGE AREA
Name: 169400
Date
Assessor Pazcel Maps associated with Schedule:
man39-231 pdf.
Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF's.
Location Map/Additional Information.
Send mail to assessor@co.jefferson.co.us with questions or comments about this Web site.
Copyright @ 2005, Jefferson County, Colorado. All rights reserved.
A Map of How to Get to Our Office
Web site information current through: 09-17-2005
Version 3.5.0 - Release Date: SEPTEMBER 2005
http://wwl4.co.jefferson.co.us/ats/displaygeneral.do?sch=025539&offset=9 9/22/2005
N~3e -
Pmpery Records General
Information _
Maps
Property appraisal system
Maps
Previous 10 OF 11 Next
Page 1 of 1
Address: 07393 W 44TH A
TYPE
111 111957 IlAveragell l IlRetail -Single Occupancyll1 114331 110 ~E
Send mail to qssessor@_qojefferson.co.us with questions or comments about this Web site.
Copyright @ 2005, Jefferson County, Colorado. All rights reserved.
A Map of How to Get to Our Office
Web site information current through: 09-17-2005
Version 3.5.0 - Release Date: SEPTEMBER 2005
htti)://wwl4.co.iefferson.co.us/ats/commercialinventory.do?sch=025539 9/22/2005
Herne - -
C
Prq Recards' ommercial
pert5 Inventory
I
N T
vi
CG . ~ A T o si
t 0_ o m ~ O z
a d o E o 0
c U o r oN
Q n m m ~ c° ~ ^ o
o °D
A a a y o 0 8
c c
0
~ N m
0 ~ y~ m I
'N .C C 0 v W U
2 n
13 2
nQ M ° - 2 y'~ c n
W O O
y n J T t~ 6
h O 9_. > 9 T
= N 00 0 °N' o f7 c o E E S
~4
U v~ m o m s ~ y ~ o z
a. Urs d r-~
~D.. L O .G N C 9 L V
jl 4J _ y
m U y'~
°w sa o ¢ ~ '@ E g
3
U 'y 'O Y LNfI 3 y y _ Tyra
4-1 Q) 4-1
w ° o r v y y Vn¢1 m
m C)
J U ~,y a d n o E y O 3
v C7 M O y y O0 N
d U U U'~ o 3 v O .G O E c Q o w ~aO7 0 3 4~
Q • 'P`j"+ N V o o E t -I 1~ U] X c a 'o g r O~ c c`C
!Yi vii y'^n c U a O,Li D C E¢^. oo E
h v E U UU]
~d 253
°a~ QI v m y `u D 3 - m v Z '~'a i= Iraq co 'y
A O .p C C O T L Q N N W 0
10
Wh oo W n o c n 3 o N c.' p a
z 6 .T 9 G .N C d
C 0 F V C LDO N D Y O 6 Y]
ea
M 3 v °J o 3 v u y F ° o T
t D
F~ 0u 3 0 .g n= %~a m m n
15
5
t
a
9
3
3
I
8
0
I
m
0
3
m
o
E s
U v
a m
P
v
d
a
z
i
VI N ~ p` h C ~ V
T> O m O Z
q c E- U `p T
m E `o
iy m v v
Q ro E~ 3 a
y EU- y '3 c e
.7 y N ~ N V
FO 0
N m N > pg~ 3
p N - 0°0 h r m
N t G G. o
O
0 o A ° t$7{1 j °c.
M E N > v 9 v
vi h O O t°. 0 4 - e° p m ° m o =
Ul ~ 9 = 44
-I C `v ~ s m z 'ti 'a
p v a m S E
U vy°i m° m z~ ,o '7 z
a E o = A y y
10 v
-~V L t 0 N C t U
G v aaVV O pp~~
ro O y o o ~i y arsax7a°ca'1
14
10 4J ul _j
A N N N c °cUt ~Ln 3
N H s ~ o g 4 Lt
4-1 co
d 3 M N m m v .y. (OQ 9 r '6 Ed
U)
C)
W > E v o r s
C
.C ..G G c v ai 9 N -ZT
a U o r ° s d c O C O a t o t''
QQ pp U m' _
W * ai c a E y-i j pp U o m Q g O w „T,
U~ 7s r-i
1-~ 1° ami d E" m U U E 0.l c a a F o f
V O oo a rn U
rW rJ °o (y O c n 3 s w
10
G c 0 d Z a S c y w c 3
a L y 3 yyH p
['q D O U 3 O t.. G. L .y 9 A A 10.. 6 L P
,2
S q T ° V
N
a d o c y O ~ p
Q o o
[U ~ ~ d
~ .E c
a w ro ~ ~ a
v `
y
00 'O y W 'N 0 3
9 N u
Ls F h Z
O ° t d
o U nN O 6 0r`! V
O cNJ y ~11 `y ~ a
= m n a) o
o m w U c o e'i o
h N O (n 9 .244 C Y O r w R
~4 00
m y C `u o FD d1 C o c o N ~E `N
U o ~J ~j A s °aj y o i
}1}yJl O ~ a-°i m ~ ~ o• ~ 9 E
a N to oat A z r~~ 3~
ro U v <r
wry L.. L O vFi 9 S v
C N N
M ~J E
N
~C E" t W CY) `v X39
Lp. 4-4 U)
Q h N .E z to - M N o c " Q m ` '6F9~
V off o A w ro M M r-, O t°.. O o ~•OOO °°°o°
Q: c y° Crt N ,O{a o E m aoi s°. O A °
a . in U 3= m W .C O .G E c Q t ° W O `0 3
-ZT ° o E s NN rl N XUU c v a 7a `o O T
LO r- -A 4j
h c D0 c' M O (1) p rl c a x m W E-. o f
m o h c 'o o ; a Zt: lv~~ ou y
T Q N G W
W °a W o c m h rFi o z a° o" s, 3 2
w q c 9 'd s c `o c ~
0 3 y F T
Fa `oU 3 0 n.~"ha c c
i
1
i
I
i ~
I~.
I
t
I
I M
I )
I
a ~
dC' !5fNt`7 3J),l
~ X
I
v
n
I~1
~I I
I
~ n
t
~3
~t~
I
~~~~~~■~I~S ~~~~~i
1
i /j f ~ d ~l U
1
I i Y
x ~ 1 ~
z
r~r ~r ~ wr~rr . r
~Y~!' i S , ` u r~~u.
_ r_
i Fxrsrrr~s r~nrcE ro ~vur~
I i 1
i
1 2 3 4 6 7 8
'TJ'1b iNAY
~tr~ n~,~rc r~ux~ wgnrc~
i i 1 Q f ` _
~ ~ EXIT TO f?~MAIN ~xt5rlN5 ro RENWN F~toF~vS~ Go1~5iR~~JOty ~i ~ HATGH lnmtGAA~
~ 20~s LA1~,~G ~F
~ ~ \ - I I DNE I~VAY ~
d`Il ~'I`~ 1 2
t j ~ y -
~ ~ V_ _ \
~ i J A l ~ G(agRC''NT" t7r~6E OF ASt~t.T 1
~ TD ~ R~V15FD ~
t ~ ~
~ _
i~ i \ \ ~ ~ " \ \ ~ ~ ~ • f
~I
\ ~ ' \ a
i 1
i~
tai d~
S
AREA S'IMMARY: ;u
I i ALLONIABLE BUILDING AREA (TABLE 503 IBG) = 9 ARFA MODIFICATIONS FOR FRONTAGE INGREASP = I, TOTAL 5F ALLOYVED = 1 I ~ TO7AL 5F PROP05ED = 9, •
a► M w r r
1,
i
PARKING SUMMARY: l
i I ~ PARKING REQUIRED = 13 ~F'AGES
HANDICAP PARKING REQUIRED = I PER 25 SPACES
I~ PARKING PROVIDED = IZ ~ I HG = 13 SPACES t
r
i LANDSCAPE SUMMARY: / f
68055 LOT AREA OF NEW PROPERTY = 121
LAND5GA~ PROVIDEIA•20~ = 23 I v
i II ~ ADD/TIONAL CITY RFQUIREMFNTS~ t
10' LANDSCAPE PROVIDED BETYYEEN PARKING ANl7 P 7REE5 PROVIDED EVERY 30' AT STREET PER GIN R li 60% MAXIMUM GLAZING ON NEW BUILDING i
ti~ -
Y..
III
ti' L _z
G R
i J
U
h. _s~,-
s
1 1 j.,
a e`.. .y i~~
c 3
F
1
1 ~ I L.
\ ~
F
_ ~
i~ i..J
\
IsrINs ua¢srur SIDEMt.+c TO Saar 97 W 44TH AVE
DATE: *26-05
Ex►srrW7 uROuUr TO R"iN
aiTE PLAN WOVE EXISTIN& 0" ~
SW,' R`l'-0' •s RELOcArF SPEW LIMIT 616N
d
i
i
i
i
i
i
s. r
'a
i
i
i ~ ~a
„~e,~,r 4
r+~ r~
i EX5 TO (ffMAIN
r~
_ F
~j
e
I
1 s_
Ci__~.._
i
I J
F
I AREA SUMMARY: _ -
i A ~ u L ` s
i ~ ~ Fl~' T ON5 FOR FRO! N A ~'RFASF . Ip~ I i
~ rora~ s~,~.~or~v . io i rora~ ~ ~or~osFV = aa i r I ~ ~
i
PARKING SUMMARY: ~ i i! _
4
I ~ PARKING REQUIRED = 13 SPAGFS T
~ HANDICAP PARKI~i RfQU/RED = 1 PER 25 SPACES
PARK/N6 PROVIDED = 12 ~ I HG = 13 SPACES I
~ LANDSCAPE SUMMARY: w
I GR055 LOT AREA OF IvEW PROPERLY = 1210 II LANDSGAP~ PROVIDEG~21 ~ = 260 ~ ADDITIONAL GIT1' REQliIREMENTS: ~
_ ~
R 3
3 Y
/ 10' LANDaGAPF PROVIDED BFTN~EN PARKING AND PR0 I~ TREFS PROVIDED EVERY 30' AT 57REEr PFR U1Y RE(d ~ ~ 60~ MAXIh~1M GLAZING ON IOW BUILDING, 6' LANDSCAP TO THE NORTH
4 i
i4
1
I
V
1
I i~ f~
1t T
I ~ -
1 Y 4
1
i l~
a mot, ~i_ a
Yw a f
I 1 i~
~ / u
r s f ~
I s`
1 y i
Y _ ~
t~ d
- ~
rs
,mot - .r ' r. ,
ti~ r~~rt~.=... i._._..
f i M~°
t. J
s V!
1
DATE: 10=W5
lNFST 44TH AVENUE /
~ SITE PLAN ° ~ ~n
5 10 15
A1.0
V
I
~ ~ ■
I
i
Ti"! CLtd J ~
I
I
r
I 1
{ b
f
I I
f r
1~ i
-1
l'
~ ~ TWD i~YAY
l
i~ Y, ~ .
~t~ri~ ux~ecvr ro ~atN
,L
s N ! ■ r
i . r
'I
I~
.1
I~
i
5
e
AREA SUMMARY: ~ l; I .rte _ - R
I ALLONfABLE BUILDING AREA (TABLE 503 IBG) = 9 ,4REA MODIFICATIONS FOR ~RONTAGF INCREASE = I, TOTAL SF ALLON~IJ ° ~ I ~ TOTAL 5F PROPOSED ° q r.
~ ~ /'ft`s - - G
1~~T~41L ~ 2700 5~? ~7
i Fx~~r~as r ~ q ro r~~N
PAiFKIN6 SUMMARY: r. - vt~ei~
PAKKING REQUIRED = 13 SPACES
HANDICAP PARKiI~i REQUIRED = ~ PER 25 SPACES
II PARKING PROVIDED = IZ + I HG = 13 SPACES
LANDSCAPE SUMMARY:
GR055 LOT AREA OF NEW PROPERTY = 12 20% GR055 L07 AREA REQUIRED L APE = 2 II LANDSCAPE RFOVIDED~20~ = 24
10 °n~'w~Y i
1 ifs
ADDITIONAL CITY REQUIREMENTS: l
10' LANDSCAPE PROVIDED BETWEEN PARKING AND P TREES PROVIDED EVERY 30' AT 57'REFT PER GIN R I 60~ MAXIhfl1M GLAZING ON NEW PUILDING
~ ll i
~ t
I
III
-mil
1~
~ [
~ . :F } _ - f
T `
O 5
- ~ 4 "f r
a
` r~
c4m
TO REMAIN WA cms cm
7EXrT I STIt~6 GIJT
1 EX15TtN6 SEPTR TO REMAIN
WA 7Rm5 f'~R G11Y GODS A1.0
i
Case No.: -
App: Last Name:
App: First Name:
Owner: Last Name:
Owner: First Name:
App Address:
City, State Zip:
App:Phone:
Owner Address:
City/State/Zip:
Owner Phone:
Project Address:
Street Name:
City/State, Zip:
Case Disposition:
Project Planner:
File Location:
Notes:
Follow-Up:
A0517 !
Quarter Section Map No.:
NE23
Roach
Related Cases:
kerry
Case History:
anance to parking &
landscaping...
Roach Investment LP !
-
/o Jerry Roach
545 W. 44th Ave.
Review Body:
BOA: 9/22105
heat Ridge,, CO 80033
03-456-4843
A`PN°
9-231-14-005
2nd Review Body:
2nd Review Date:
Decision-making Body:
BOA9/22/OS
_
-I
332
,
Approval/Denial Date:
est 44th Avenue
_
heat Ridge, C080033 (
Reso/Ordinance No.:
Conditions of Approval:
i
District:
Crane
ctive _ Date Received: 5/15420057
Pre-App Date: l~
i i
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
018/19/nib 10x356 All rdb
TERRY ROACH
RECE'IP'T 140oCO1957G AMOUNT
PMSD ZONING APPLICATION F .300.00
ZONE
FM4D ZONING REINBUREEMENT MOO
?REIM
PAYMENT RECEIVED MOUNT
CK 7287 3 0,00
TOTAL 3gn.0U