Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUP-06-04c- Jl ~a~ rnom oy iuw t m ~ronrtaL ins menu items to first-time Vincenza's customer Larry Peterson as he and Virginia Zick Friday, Jan. S. Stefano has beena waitress at Vincenza's Italian Bakery for nearly three • ,mpt 1 n m service catch up on the cleaning while vis- itingwith her co-workers. Working at the restaurant is more than a job for Stefano. It's become a way of life since she dropped out of high school. Vmcenzas has shaped Her life and helped her grow froma trou- bled teen into a purposeful, re- sponsiblewoman. "I couldn't picture myself any- where else," she said. Stefano grewup inWheat Ridge, just down the street from the old Wheat Ridge Dairy. She attended Wheat Ridge High School, but ad- mits she was abit of a troublemak- er. She got tickets for breaking cur- few and drinking. She never had much interest in schoolwork or typical high school activities. Stefa- no and school just didrit.inix, and she dropped out after a few years, she said. Soon after, Stefano filled out an application at Vince=as and was hired the day of her interview. She started as a busperson. It was her first real job, she said. Greg Allanhad recently become the owner of Vircenza's when Ste- fano started. At first, she was fairly quiet, coming in and doing her job and punching out, Allan said. But Stefano is a people-person by na- ture, and she quickly.became a fa- vorite with regulars. Many of them 'See WAITRESS, page 3 ~ ~~*rnv Wheat Ridgeq decision may lead to suit Expansion request at center of problem between church, city BYBRIANAHOVENDICK brianah@milehighnews:com The city of Wheat Ridge may face a lawsuit for denying Ap- plewood Baptist Church's ex- pansion request The church has threatened to sue, and it might now af- ter the latest decision by the Wheat Ridge City Council. On Monday, Jan. 8, councilors up- held their Dec. 11 ruling that denied the church's request for a special- CityCOuouse permit sssuesand to expand its ed- declsiprjs auxiliary ucation ity on 32nd Avenue. More than 100 members ofApplewood Baptist Church packed the council chambers on Monday, Jan: 8, in a show of support for the church's re- quest for reconsideration. Calvin Wittman, Apple- wood Baptist's pastor, said the `church "simply wanted to send the City Council a vi- sual message," about how the ruling affects people who live and worship in Wheat Ridge. "We.are somewhat baffled by the decision," Wittman said. The church wants to con- struct a three-story-educa- tional building similar to its existing building that would house a large-multipurpose room and 14 classrooms for Sunday school, Bible study and other church activities. Councilors denied the re- quest because they felt the See LAWSUIT, page 5 THURSDAY, JANUARY 11, 2007 WHEAT RIDGE TRANSCRIPT LAWSUIT FROM PAGE 1 expansion would be detrimental to the neighborhood's residential character and would overburden streets with additional traffic. Several neighbors spoke out against the expansion at the Dec. 11 hearing. The church's architect, Stan- ley Pouw, told church represen- tatives that because their plans for the new building had been al- tered to meet the city's requests, a special-use permit would likely be approved, Wittman said. The church agreed to install a pedestrian traffic signal on 32nd Avenue between the sanctu- ary and the education building, Pouw said at the Dec. 11 hear- ing. The church does not want an acrimonious relationship with the city, Wittman said. "There are better things to spend public money on than a lawsuit," he said. City officials and attorneys for Applewood Baptist. Church would not comment on pending litigation. Several church members said the church expansion would be a community resource, meshing *well with the city's goals for eco- nomic revitalization. Many people who come to Applewood Baptist for church stay in Wheat Ridge to eat lunch and do their shopping, member ^ Brian Cecil said. I ` "It's about community," Cecil said. Wheat Ridge City Cc Monday, January 8, 2007 Present: Mayor Jerry DiTullio, Council President Mike Stites, Mayor pro tern Wanda Sang„Kar ble, Karen Berry NotPreselrt: Lena Rotola, Dean Gokey ISSUES IMPACT Council Bill 01-2007: Amending Chap- The bill amends the city's dangerous animal ordinance to make its definition of & ter4 of the Wheat Ridge: Code of Laws gerous and aggressive animals consistent with the definitions in the ordinancesc concerning the regulation of animals. surrounding municipalities and in Jefferson County. A consistent ordinance will a for better regulation and tracking of dangerous animals within and across Jeffers County. This model countywide ordinance was adopted by Jefferson County and the cities of Lakewood, Westminster and Arvada. A second part of the ordinance authorizing Wheat Ridges participation in a countywide licensing program, will r - take effect until the county has implemented the program and an intergovernmei ` - -agreement is approved. Resolution 01-2007: Approving the The resolution streamlines the police pension plan document by removing incon: adoption of the amended and restated tencies and provisions not applicable to government pension plans, which will pe city of Wheat Ridge money purchase - additional flexibility in plan operation and reduce future costs to maintain the plat pension plan for designated police de- tax-qualified status: - partmentemployees'- Resolution 02-2007: Approving an In 2006, JCETSA approved funding for the implementation and maintenance of t Intergovemmenbi Agreement(IGA) Regional Mapping Project for use by 10 E-911 Public Safety Answering Points with between Wheat Ridge and the Jefferson- Jefferson and Broomfield counties. Staff at a public safety communications cente County-Emergency Telephone Service Wheat Ridge will be able to use the regional map in their dispatch center and inp Authority( JCETSA) for the implemen- and fire response vehicles. The IGA governs the sharing of data. tation and maintenanceofa;geographic information system(GIS)regional map- ping project;:. , Resolution 03-2007: Approving a Nextel and law enforcement agencies in Wheat Ridge and Lakewood operate on frequency reconfiguration agreement same 800 MHz radio frequency band, resulting in continual interference. In 200( between Wheat Ridge, the city of Federal Communications Commission amended its rules for the 800 MHz band, Lakewood and Nextel West Corpora- as a result, the Nextel Corporation agreed to reimburse government entities for tf tion to reconfigure the 800 MHz to cost of moving their radio systems to the 400 MHz band, eliminating the interfer minimize harmful interference to public safety radio communication systems in the band. Motion to accept findings of fact for Upholds council's Dec. it decision to deny Applewood Baptist Church'sapplicafic Applewood Baptist Church a special-use permit. 7500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Wheat Telephone 303/235-2846 Ridge FAX 303/235-2857 December 14, 2006 Stanley Pouw Pouw & Associates Inc. 190 E. 9th Ave., # 250 Denver, CO 80203 Dear Mr. Pouw: At its meeting of December 11, 2006, City Council DENIED Case No. SUP-06-04, a request for a Special Use Permit to allow expansion of an education building as ancillary to a church in an R-1 Zone District located at 11225 W. 32nd Avenue for the following reasons: 1. There have been objections filed regarding the application. 2. There will be visual impacts on the neighborhood, as well as an increase in traffic on West 32nd Avenue. 3. There will be a negative impact on the light and air to adjacent properties. 4. There will be air and noise pollution generated by vehicles entering and exiting the expanded parking area. 5. There will be unacceptable safety hazards to pedestrians and vehicles. Enclosed is a draft copy of the minutes stating the Council's decision. The City Attorney will prepare findings for the next Council meeting on January. No testimony will be taken for this item. Please feel free to contact me at 303-235-2846 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Kathy Fie d Administrative Assistant Enclosure: Draft Minutes cc: Applewood Baptist Church 11200 W. 32nd Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 c9...\My Documents\Kathy\PCRPTS\PLANGCOM\CORRESP\2006\SUP0604 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: December 11, 2006 Page -4- Item 3. COUNCIL BILL 31-2006 -AMENDING SECTION 5-85 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS PERTAINING TO THE INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE. (Case No. WCA-06-06) Mayor DiTullio opened the public hearing. Council Bill 31-2006 was introduced on second reading by Ms. Berry. Ms. Berry read the executive summary. Clerk assigned Ordinance No. 1381. Alan White presented the staff report. Chad Root, Chief Building Inspector, answered Councils' questions. Mayor DiTullio closed the public hearing. Motion by Ms. Berry to approve Council Bill 31-2006 (Ordinance 1381) on second reading and that it take effect 15 days after final publication; seconded by Mrs. Sang; carried 7-0. Item 4. A Request for a Special Use Permit to allow expansion of an education building as ancillary to a church in an R-1 Zone District located at 11225 W. 32" Avenue, Wheat Ridge. (Case No. SUP-06-04) (Applewood Baptist Church) Mayor DiTullio opened the public hearing. Item 4 was introduced by Mr. Stites. Mr. Stites read the executive summary Mayor DiTullio administered Oath to all people intending to speak. Meredith Reckert, Wheat Ridge Community Development Department, presented the staff report and gave power point presentation. She entered a group of 8 letters into the record, which were submitted to City staff today. They were letters of objection from people who lived in Wheat Ridge and Lakewood. She also entered into the record the Zoning Ordinance, the Case File, and contents of this digital presentation. All proper notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore Council has jurisdiction to hear this case. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: December 11, 2006 Page -5- Architect Stanley Pouw, 14060 Elderberry Road, Golden, representing the applicant, explained the scheme for the new building and its proposed uses as well as the parking and landscaping. Traffic issues are a concern, but the applicant has agreed to put in a traffic light and will pay for that. The following citizens spoke against the Special Use Permit and urged Council to deny it: Mike Larkin, Lakewood, Tiffany Barnhart, Dan Barnhart, Pete Klammer, Tom Radigan Sheila Bardwell Ralph and Debbie Perri, Lakewood, Christine Tomavich, Lakewood, Holly Heaton Arthur Gibbard Julia Parisian Their reasons for opposition included, but were not limited to, parking in neighborhood streets instead of Church parking lot; church does not shovel their sidewalks; increased traffic, noise, air and light pollution; destroying the quality of life for people in Applewood; this does not belong in a residential neighborhood; will hurt property values; church does not pay taxes, residents do; unanswered questions about the proposed use of the building; church is growing into a mega church and needs to be in a commercial area. Mayor DiTullio called for a 10-15 Minute break at 8:44 p.m. Meeting reconvened at 8:58 p.m. Council questions and discussion followed. Fred Lantz did traffic study on the project and explained the methodology he used. Tim Paranto stated that City staff reviewed the traffic study. Motion by Mr. Stites to deny Case No. SUP-06-04 for the following reasons: 1. There have been objections filed regarding the application. 2. There will be visual impacts on the neighborhood, as well as an increase in traffic on West 32na Avenue. 3. There will be a negative impact on the light and air to adjacent properties. 4. There will be air and noise pollution generated by vehicles entering and exiting the expanded parking area. 5. There will be unacceptable safety hazards to pedestrians and vehicles. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: December 11, 2006 Page -6- Councilmember Stites further moved to direct the City Attorney to prepare findings for this Item and bring them back to the next Council Meeting for approval; seconded by Mr. Schulz; carried 7-0. DECISIONS. RESOLUTIONS, AND MOTIONS Item 5. RESOLUTION 62-2006 - LEVYING GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES FOR THE YEAR OF 2006, TO HELP DEFRAY THE COSTS OF GOVERNMENT FOR THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO, FOR THE 2007 BUDGET YEAR. Resolution 62-2006 was introduced by Mrs. Sang. Motion by Mrs. Sang to adopt Resolution 62-2006 levying a mill levy of 1.830 on general property taxes for the Year of 2006, to help defray the costs of government for the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado for the 2007 budget year; seconded by Mrs. Adams; carried 7-0. Item 6. RESOLUTION 55-2006 -ADOPTING THE SECOND MODIFICATION TO THE 38TH AVENUE CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PLAN. Resolution 55-2006 was introduced by Mr. Schulz, who also read the executive summary. Motion by Mr. Schulz to adopt Resolution 55-2006; seconded by Mrs. Rotola. Charles Durbin spoke against this Resolution. He is concerned about taking tax money away from the City, the schools, and various districts. He thought Wheat Ridge was trying to improve their tax base. Urban Renewal has $800,000 of promised TIF money tied up in litigation. This Resolution needs closer examination. Alan White presented the staff report and entered Urban Renewal Resolution 05-2006 into the record, which recommends forwarding this item to City Council. He clarified some of the comments Mr. Durbin made. Mayor DiTullio called for a 5 Minute break at 9:50 because of background noise. Meeting resumed at 9:55 p.m. Motion carried 7-0. 0 Q v 0 (D 0 (D ((D N O O 07 0 l< 0 0 C D 0 1 CD e~-i- CQ O ~ CD C: cn ~ (n. 01 O Cn O_ -0 W n o F. c C: I 0 CD CD Q c: 3 n W r-1- O O N 1 C ~ C _ ~ W N i CD CD J in CD z 0 C 0 s~ 0 0 ^ Y.L r t Y 1 l II v Y T-e 5 C i F° r' O 0 rt O 0 - CD N O O C) O CD Q O O C Q O (Z O K (7 N O O O CD CD cQ• CT O O O_ CD (D CQ O CD v n v O I CD Q C n v 0 D (n N O O C C 07 CD Q 0 w (n CD (D CD m C v K zT (2 v (7 O f2 '0 m. N O O Q Q O v CD (C] 3 07 O zr O O (Z CD CD (f? (n CD CD x v (n 0 (D Z 0 O C O N O O 0 O W Z Q (D Sy O cm 3- L O O Q 3 CD CD (n CD n (Q C ~ CD v CQ `G v Q.. CQ CD v n• ill O I CD C2 N O O CD N O cn n O 0- (D n C C7 CD (n (S CD 0 O CD (n CD n. O C (n cn r-F /1 co . V C n O O n O (D I ~ n ~ (n CD cOn CD ~ v v (D O Q.. O CD `G v .O (n n (D sll O (0 O sll O CD x v Ov O CD Q O f2 C 00 CD N O n O 0- (D 0 C n CD (n 0- CD n O CD n O O C (n CD (n co co .P CD Q. 0 0 C Q (Q n O (n C CD Q. v w CD CD C cn CD D n CD O_ rn co 0 CD Mol rm#L ♦ m VI rMIL LJ 41 1 r - 3 Ea 8 g? / p F k'/ ~ ~ 6 F_ ~ I 9 m ~ la ` /i ii a£x U I i I ``I , ~ ~ ~ ~ G rYl ~ G 1 I ~ i I 1 '4 I I _ _ _ ' bv:c / rr 4.. . 25 I% `aa.-'1 F. - ~Irt ag .I e. M /IL' 81 -o.x -Ty~. e ~s I~' I Ile I` C I Ill I; I , III j SEE i~ €I l 4 v so tl4~ l( aJ l II ,y ~ 6 al I ~ I 1 I I 1 I ka 1h, E I & i II d` 1 1 'I-i'i g4 opal II ~e~ I ~ I I F~e I n4 ek¢`n I 3G IIQ 1A 8 84'9"ETfBp ' / $ 3 - L 1 Gi5£M 32nD AV£NUC - I NBT.9'S5'C ]1. f,~ =g s xo r °z m 4N~£D O co~Fm~C~ Q ItYO NO W nA 3'-u m x~myna D~m.4}O U Aa~d O~ ?~emi'm~ n 4~ZZNN /T~~ ~9NQp V) ~cwo ~ o~ z Q o ZS AZ W O Z I ,g Z o > o : (D v 0- cn CD C)_ n (n o O O Cn ZT O CD o C m N r+. CD F _ E -1 . O 0 =3 CD G N ` C 31 =T CD Q Q D O C CD CD =b r Q CL) O O O 0 N N O Q C U) O CD N ~ Q CD D 3 - 0- < CD W CD ~ D ~ - C CD CD' G C- r+ v 0 CD En 3 cc cc m cn O 3 v r+ CD CD r+ O CD CD CD CD zr v CD l< CD O O O t% CCDD CD ~ v CD :3 CD =3 3 cn cn 0 O O CA 5vi a cr Q c0 O v N ~m nj ~ cn z -u o o Q (a C~ v 3 = - 0- o O o C - C o ° CD 0' < ° . ~ o =3 CD :3 w o 3 =T 0 -0 0 (n m m v FD 0 Q ~ ~ (0 ~ c 0 . ' ° c• cn o ~ C m CD CL CD n CD CD cn CD 0 C ~D O 0 m v Ti .G n r v 0 v; z r : _ n - jV s ;wn A I ` , l 9 O .J 2 i ` d Y F 1 t y~ VVIS: r ,00 g his 1x 1 k f b Y, , 3 1 i x ~ g t_ e x i 1 1 3 F rz 1 F~ ( 1 $ ~ !r: t f p~; l I: ' J01; RA x 11'. T Y. r I r ¢F [J7 ~ f k- l: M I' ~l ~r RR ;7 co -n CD Q. O CD O Q Q. 9 3 CD N W - Q S O 02 C Q T O O O ~ Q GJ N CD D Q. Q. m ~ D o 0 ou O O --4- 0 < r. -0 ' CD Q (n Q ~ i CD Q O CD O O cn N O < p 0 m O o ~ O v (Q CD cn --h CD . CQ ^ CD CD N v 00 O CD N N cn O 07 cn O P O Cn N (n Cn :--h O D CD ^ c o O cn w 3 v X_ 3 c 3 O -u m W O p C -0 ~ . Q (D CC Q cn 0 ~ ~ CD - CD 0 (n C CD ~ CD O P O Q C CD O Uri ~ Cr CA CC) 0 co O cn ol Cn CA CA ~ ~ ~ D (D tD r1 LeJ 3 rml- V♦ /rot, 1.1r su Mi /om VI : I , 44 fi son; r Tit ' r W", " a i~kt I Wl 1 t ~ ~5 I a p # " #~...nf MEq 3 1~t y PJ i RU'lWi l- z' _00 ill x'L:' P k` r tF t i : I i 111 i t a Ak SIP f P T 0- 7 ~ 12 r, :h l C r• w 9A K i C #n~~"•' ti ~ t t rc w ,iii i _ f"' S Y r M O rj~ ti f n s - `c x t- ; t I r s r r < 5 x' :f 5 eel'. 4 1 } 1 1 i i I. ~ 1\ l~ ~ i ~I~ 3 k n L~ / i ~ y~ kS _ D~a ~e ~ , to ~ ~airc ~ 2 } N (n COD O X X. (Q Q CD cn CD O -P v O cn CD CD (n O Q U) 3 (D 0. 0 Q CD w 0 v Q 0 (Q 0 CD v X O a r~ Q cn v 0 O CD cn cn CD CD CD CD Q v CD r~ I -I CD CD X_ cn (Q O a O c r-4- (n I CD CD O O cn Q O- Q Q CQ (Q 0 3 v CD w (Q CD (n' Q c~ v Q CD Q 0 CD CQ r,- v X Q cn W Q 3 CD r~ CO 3 v O Q r~ CD v 3 (D CD Q C) r~ O r~ 3 v r+ zr CD (nn' Q v O CD 0 N v (D (D r.1 U B (D roll- Q 2) CL U) O F 3 t ' E % a s 5 ; Fi ax~ e I `I r rt i navy i Lrv B P° r z N fl ~ a m ~ td1 z i z n x c n x D CD cn 0 CD CD Q CD QL 0 CD 9 CD 5c c cn. ~n.(D. 0 0 Q CD CD s (D (D cn cn 0 0 CD w N 1-1 cn MMI 0 rn ~a CD 0. CD 0 c ~a) C'n CD N mcn Q M ~CL 0 ~CD CD ~o CD ~cn0- CD N r- 0 o ~ 0 0 C~ CD CD Q 00 0 0 N Q v (D (D Lei 3 cn 0 0 rmPL 1 ~i,4I'l lip, tj (.o~~}ii I i t ; - ;a t,iM lf t !ia U i 2 t ~ I i l tv s . , l t f l 9 -gat it r; i, r } t s 1 t ; z x 3 T P ~ k _ ipal.'q YJN~xN . rcm Vrx , j t e r ] I I s~ i I i a, p t-t - fYiJ G cl- 2-Cit t ~ 7 a I ; ss- t q I }k 4 t -S' t ~ t ! f kT . v r` j 1 ~ c3 r - 9 I^ g i { e AP^LfWOOD CHURCH - BELFAY ENG{NEERfNG Sn O D Cl) D = O CD CD N co Q (n I C D 0 0 O Z3 N (Q CD CD c' CQ CD M o W O cn c n N =3 cn C/) CD r--l- -1 > o n v n o ' ' c n p -G CD o m 3 O Cn O O = C D C ~ Cn Q CD CD 0 CD m g< CD ~ 0- o CD c 3 o D C C o 3 cQ c m o v - w CD =3 in 0 < rn C " 70 o< CD CCD CD I = C D ~ CD CQ 3 CL CL CD co m CD -0 (D CD (n CZ CD C ~ cD C CD Q `G CD CD _0 CD 7 N 0- iv =3 cn =3 O =T n CD O O C'~ ° ° v = v n Z 0 X U) (n o- 0 m CD U) CD ~ m " CD cn ° ~ o m CD cQ CD C o v M v CD CD CD D Q 0 (D CD o ° ' v 0 cn 0 v _ n 0 Q CD : N CQ 70 v c 0 cn ~ ° Z3 Q 0 ~ 0- x' 0 C 3 < ' U) U) m c CD ' c n CD M Q. CD ° 0 CD v _0 0 ° ~ (n v ~ ~ 3 0 ~ o C~ v h o v CD Q CD :3 0 v CD O 0 w Q v o CD C7 cn a 0 CD (n _0 v CD CD 0 'I 0 n 0 0 CD = cn ~ ~ o v CD m cQ ~ o c CD =5 C) 0- C7 W CD M sv N c 0 -0 M 0- ° 0 o CD CO, CD cn CD Q D ° _ 3 F (n CD < c m n CD =3 v CD cn N C u , CD :3 C n y CD 0 - 0 CD CD _0 CD CD 0 w o 0 CD ;Z cn CD Q m 0 CD mmh (D A~ iil O c X O O Q =3 Z3 (Q Q _0 CD CD O Q' Q_ cr CD ,_-O -z O 0- -m CD 3 : l< n f CD =r' Q_ L DJ O Q_ N O CD N O r:3 CL ` O v Q n O cn CD a) CD Q_ ~N Q_ c O Cn n O Q CD ~ O 0 O Q_ ~ Q CD I O CD Q_ -M- w M, m CD CD n CD CD O CD cn. U) o CD :3 A =3 CD C D O cQ =3 3 _ 0 CD CD v s L n. Q_ . - CQ C` DD l- CL O ~ , 77 CD c W cn 3 c: CD O Q n O O CQ n C ~ O' . - O ~ N c Q_ cn = - O Q Q_ Q O O cn CD CD v 3 n O O CQ O- O O Q_ cn m n /c CD 0 rmlL tD ii/ _ 0 D v > ~ n =T CD v-~° 0 CD co 14< cn ~ cQ :3 0 (D 0 ::3 cones O - Q O _ o -0 ~ m < o 0 ch CD - C o (D v CD o =3 -0 o -v o 3 : m ::3 CD < (n X O_ m O CD ( r-l- CD M CD cn zy CD N CD ~ Q CD _0 CO -0 O ~ CD cn (n CD O (n 0- CD CQ CD O _ C: (D CQ O Cn M cn C 0 CD C CD cn O --h r-4- cQ CCDD Q n zy : r-+, Q CD Q CD Q. O 0 rmP- cn v D c C ~ ~ ~ v-o ,-4- o 0-CL =3 o 3 cp Q =3 Q 0 o m . n CD cn CL 0 ~ocQ cn 0 b =3 . 0 0 o =3 3 0 V+ ~ o r-l- -a CL 0 E5, m -1 -h =3 _0 v ~Cc X- CD 0- _0 cQ CD cn = ° m Q cn 3 cc' ~ o CCD CCD cQ CD Q 0 w I< C C CCD CCD CCD vo v~ ~D CD -s =3 -0 0 (n CL (D rl- ~ o (D 000 0 v cn ~ - n CD `Q O m m 0_ 0 Q CD +1 3 0_ c C CD O. CD w D N 0 n ~ D cn 0- 0 cn o 00 < 6:30 p.m. Pre-Meeting CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE, MUNICIPAL BUILDING January 8. 2007 7:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF December 11, 2006 CITIZENS' RIGHT TO SPEAK Citizens, who wish, may speak on any matter not on the Agenda for a maximum of 3 Minutes and sign the Public Comment Roster. 2. Citizens who wish to speak on Agenda Items, please sign the GENERAL AGENDA ROSTER or appropriate PUBLIC HEARING ROSTER before the item is called to be heard. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Executive Session with the City Attorney and appropriate staff under Charter Section 5.7(b)(1) for the purpose of receiving legal advice on threatened litigation by Applewood Baptist Church under land use case SUP-06-04, and specific legal questions related thereto. Executive Session Resume Regular Meeting. ORDINANCES ON FIRST READING Item 1. COUNCIL BILL 01-2007 - AMENDING CHAPTER 4 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS CONCERNING THE REGULATION OF ANIMALS. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA: January8, 2007 Page -2- DECISIONS. RESOLUTIONS. AND MOTIONS Item 2. RESOLUTION 01-2007 - APPROVING THE ADOPTION OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE MONEY PURCHASE PENSION PLAN FOR DESIGNATED POLICE DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES FOR THE PURPOSE OF STREAMLINING THE PLAN DOCUMENT, REMOVING INCONSISTENCIES AND PLAN PROVISIONS NOT APPLICABLE TO GOVERNMENTAL PENSION PLANS, PERMITTING ADDITIONAL FLEXIBILITY IN PLAN OPERATION AND REDUCING FUTURE COSTS TO MAINTAIN THE PLAN'S TAX- QUALIFIED STATUS. Item 3. RESOLUTION 02-2007-APPROVING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT (IGA) BETWEEN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE AND THE JEFFERSON COUNTY EMERGENCY TELEPHONE SERVICE AUTHORITY (JCETSA) FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION AND MAINTENANCE OF A GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM (GIS) REGIONAL MAPPING PROJECT. r. Item 4. RESOLUTION 03-2007 - APPROVING A FREQUENCY RECONFIGURATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, THE CITY OF LAKEWOOD AND NEXTEL WEST CORPORATION TO RECONFIGURE THE 800 MHZ BAND TO MINIMIZE HARMFUL INTERFERENCE TO PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS IN THE BAND ("RECONFIGURATION"). Item 5. Motion to accept the Findings of Fact for Applewood Baptist Church. CITY MANAGER'S MATTERS CITY ATTORNEY'S MATTERS ELECTED OFFICIALS' MATTERS ADJOURNMENT of wH~r ITEM NO: i a J ~CORp~ m REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 8, 2007 TITLE: MOTION TO APPROVE FINDINGS AND DECISION - AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY FOR APPLEWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH (SUP-06-04) ❑ PUBLIC HEARING ❑ ORDINANCES FOR 1 ST READING (Date:-) ® BIDS/MOTIONS ❑ ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING ❑ RESOLUTIONS Quasi-Judicial: ® ❑ Yes No City Manag City Attorney EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On December 11, 2006 the Council heard the application of the Applewood Baptist Church for a special use permit to build an additional education building on the north parcel of the church campus. Following the hearing the Council voted to deny the application and to direct the City Attorney to prepare written findings and decision for its consideration at the next Council meeting. The requested findings and decision is attached. STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES: The primary consideration for the Council is whether the application satisfies the requirements of Code Section 26-114 for approval of a special use permit. Those requirements, and the information presented at the public hearing bearing upon them, are detailed in the attached findings and decision. COMMISSION/BOARD RECOMMENDATION: N/A ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: (1) Do not approve the findings and decision; (2) Reconsider the decision to deny the permit; (3) Continue the matter for action to a future Council meeting. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the written findings and decision in Case No. SUP-06-04, denying the application of Applewood Baptist Church for a special use permit." or, "I move to deny approval of the written findings and decision in Case No. SUP-06-04, denying the application of Applewood Baptist Church for a special use permit for the following reason(s) Report Prepared by: Gerald Dahl, City Attorney (303) 493-6670 Reviewed by: Randy Young, City Manager Attachments 1. Findings and Decision COUNCIL CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE. COLORADO In Re: Application of Applewood Baptist Church for a Special Use Permit Case No. SUP - 06-04 FINDINGS AND DECISION THIS MATTER COMES before the Wheat Ridge City Council (the "Council") upon the application of Applewood Baptist Church for a special use permit to allow expansion of an education building as ancillary to a church in an R-1 zone district located at 11225 West 32nd Avenue in Wheat Ridge, Colorado. The Council, having conducted the required public hearing and being fully advised in the matter, enters the following Findings and Decision. FINDINGS 1. This Application was filed by the Applewood Baptist Church (the "Church") to request approval of a special use permit for the property located at 11225 West 32nd Avenue (the "Subject Property"). 2. The Subject Property is 6.85 acres in size, is currently zoned R-1: Residential-1, and has an existing 24,815 square foot education building, parking and landscaping. 3. The Church wishes to construct a 35,685 square foot addition to the existing education building, with expanded parking and landscaping. 4. The R-1 zone district is a low density zoning category which allows primarily single family residential development. There are also a variety of recognized ancillary uses such as the keeping of household pets and special uses. 5. Wheat Ridge Code of Laws (the "Code"), Section 26-204 permits special uses in the R-1 zone district including government buildings with outside storage, bed and breakfast facilities and churches. 6. As an expansion of a use ancillary to a church, the Application is one for a special use permit in the R-1 zone district. Code Section 26-204. The procedure and criteria for review and action by the City on special use permit applications are contained in Code Section 26-114. 7. Pursuant to Code Section 26-114-C, a special use permit is first reviewed administratively. A 10-day public notice period runs during which comments may be submitted in favor of or against the proposal. If relevant objections are received during the notice period, the request must be forwarded to the City Council for review. Community Development staff received two letters of objection regarding the request; therefore, it was forwarded to the City Council. 8. As described in the Planning Division staff report introduced into the hearing record, the campus of the Applewood Baptist Church is split between the City of Lakewood and the City of Wheat Ridge, with the main sanctuary building and ancillary parking located on the south side of 32nd Avenue within the City of Lakewood (the "South Parcel"). 9. The portion of the Church campus located on the north side of 32nd Avenue and within the City of Wheat Ridge, (the "North Parcel") is a 6.85-acre site containing a 24,815 square foot, three-story education building, parking for 213 vehicles and a storm water detention area. Three existing curb cuts on 32nd Avenue permit traffic to enter the North Parcel from 32nd Avenue. 10. The Application proposes the construction of a second education building on the North Parcel, connected to the first and located north and west of the existing building. 11. The Application proposes to reconfigure the parking area to reduce the number of curb cuts. The parking lot on the North Parcel currently contains 213 parking spaces. The Application proposes to increase this number to 441 spaces, including 12 handicap spaces. 12. Prior to the hearing, the Church's representative could not provide an accurate number of the current Church membership. However, it was indicated that the attendance on Sunday mornings varies from 629 to 999 persons between the two morning services. The Church presently employs volunteer crossing guards to assist pedestrians crossing 32nd Avenue for Sunday church services on the South Parcel and various functions in the education building on the North Parcel. Attendees at Sunday church services and for other events during the week park both on the South Parcel, which contains approximately 133 parking spaces, and also on the North Parcel. 13. The Application was heard by the City Council in a public hearing on December 11, 2006. Notice of the hearing was properly given as required by Code Section 26-109. 14. A the December 11, 2006 hearing, the City Council accepted the following exhibits into the hearing record: • Planning Staff report • Zoning ordinance 2 • Case file, including application and traffic report • Digital presentation 15. The primary witness on behalf of the Church at the December 11, 2006 public hearing was its architect Stanley Pouw. Mr. Pouw introduced the Church's consultant team, including a traffic engineer, a landscape architect, a civil engineer, and a lighting consultant. Mr. Pouw presented site drawings of the proposed building and described it as being oriented east and west to free up views of the mountains. Mr. Pouw testified that there are presently a total of 213 parking spaces presently on the North Parcel. Mr. Pouw testified that the Application proposes the construction of 228 additional parking spaces on the North Parcel, all dedicated to the new education building use which is the subject of the Application. Mr. Pouw testified that the Church would agree to the construction of a pedestrian crossing signal on West 32nd Avenue. 16. In response to questions from Council Member Adams and staff, Mr. Pouw: • described the proposed education building as containing approximately fourteen classrooms, a multi-purpose room similar to a gymnasium, a kitchen and restrooms. • described the use of the education building as for "church classes" and, potentially, youth group activities. In response to a further series of questions Mr. Pouw testified that the multi-purpose room could be used for other functions, such as weddings and receptions. • testified that the use of the multi-purpose room would not be restricted to church members, and that anyone could rent the multi-purpose room for an event such as a wedding or wedding reception. 17. In further response to questions from Council Member Adams, Mr. Pouw testified: • that the majority of use of the educational building would be on Sunday and on Wednesday night, but he also testified that the building would be available for use on other days. • that he was unable to describe what the number of hours of use of the building would be on an average week, stating that the Church program changes frequently and that the highest use would be on Sundays and Wednesday evenings. • that the parking for the proposed educational building was calculated on the basis of a classroom building. 18. In response to questions from Council Member Stites, Mr. Pouw testified that: • the existing education building does not have a gym or multi-purpose room. • the proposed multi-purpose room in the new education building would be approximately 60' x 90' and that 200 to 300 people could be 3 accommodated in that room. If the multi-purpose room were used for an athletic event, only the players would fit. • the multi-purpose room could be used for a youth meeting. • the disconnected Church campus (between the North and South Parcels) leads to the requirement of a pedestrian crossing signal on 32nd Avenue. that: 19. In response to questions from Council Member Gokey, Mr. Pouw testified • weddings and wedding receptions could take place on Fridays or Saturdays and that there was no restriction on this. 20. Council Member Sang stated that she has observed traffic on 32nd Avenue and that the pedestrians do not obey the crossing guards at the present time. 21. In response to questions from Council Member Schulz, Mr. Pouw stated that it was the Church's commitment that the new education building on the North Parcel would not be used as a sanctuary. Councilmember Schulz stated that he was concerned with the safety of crossing pedestrians even with a pedestrian traffic light. 22. The Church's traffic engineer, Fred Lantz of Lantz & Associates testified with respect to the process used to calculate the traffic and parking requirements associated with the Application: • Present traffic was counted • Did not use the sanctuary seats method • Instead, looked at Sunday services • Took Sunday services and increased by 10% per year • Carried this number out for 20 years 23. Mr. Lantz further testified that on Sundays the proposed increase attributed to the education building would be 18 vehicles into the property and 70 vehicles out between services. 24. In response to questions from Council Member Rotola, Mr. Pouw testified that the additional parking proposed as a part of the Application would help, but would not eliminate, the present problem of parishioners parking on the streets in the neighborhood. 25. The following persons testified in opposition to the Application: Mike Larkin: Mr. Larkin testified that he lives in Lakewood near the Church and that his concern is parking. The Church members do not park in the lot; instead they always park in the streets. The Church does not clear snow from its sidewalks. The Church's newsletter in 2004 stated that it is the Church's mission to grow and break all attendance records. Mr. Larkin testified that neighbors cannot get out of their driveways on Sundays. 4 Tiffany Barnhart: Ms. Barnhart testified that she lives adjacent to the North Parcel on the east and that the residential neighborhood is not designed to accommodate a church of this size. She testified that she was concerned with congestion, noise and air pollution as well as the safety of pedestrians crossing 32"d Avenue. She testified that the 25-foot access running through the parking area east of the existing education building would negatively impact her. She further testified that the Church maintains a school bus lot and trash bin on the parking lot associated with the North Parcel and that she had never been approached about this. Dan Barnhart: Mr. Barnhart questioned the scope of the Church's proposed use and why it is needed. Mr. Barnhart testified that he felt a mega-church is not appropriate for this location and questioned why the Church had refused to describe its full calendar of proposed events on the Subject Property. Mr. Barnhart questioned what would happen to the building if it were vacated. Pete Klammer: Mr. Klammer testified that the Church's newsletter indicated that 70% of the congregation lives within a 10-mile radius of the Church, which indicated that its impact was regional and not local in nature. Mr. Klammer testified to the present impacts from bus parking, litter and traffic and that with the recent approval of the Cabela's project, traffic on 32"d Avenue would already increase and that approving this Application would make that situation worse. Tom Radigan: Mr. Radigan testified that there were approximately 3,000 Church members, with 1,000 attending on Sunday. Mr. Radigan testified that 70% of the Church members who would use the new education building live outside of Lakewood and Wheat Ridge and that 90% drive to the Church, resulting in an impact out of proportion to the neighborhood. Mr. Radigan questioned whether the increase in size of the education building would increase use of the worship center. Finally, Mr. Radigan observed that there is no restriction on seven-day per week use of the education building as proposed. Sheila Bardwell: Ms. Bardwell lives adjacent to the Church. She testified that the surrounding area is residential and that the weekend traffic endangers persons using the bike path and trails. Ms. Bardwell testified that presently the parking lot lights produce glare and any increase in parking lot lighting would affect her ability to sell her home. Ralph and Debbie Perri: Mr. and Mrs. Perri testified that they own property adjacent to the North Parcel, and felt that the proposed size of the new education building would be too large. They stated that adding the 47,000 square feet of buildings on both North and South Parcels now, and including the 36,000 square feet of new educational building area, gives a total 83,000 square feet plus a parking lot which is the size of a Wal-Mart parking lot. They testified that this is too great a burden for a small neighborhood, and that the noise and air pollution and congestion existing now would only be made worse. Mr. Perri testified that approval of the application would change 5 his quality of life and stated that it was impossible to be able to buffer an 83,000 square foot complex. Mr. Perri testified that a small neighborhood church would be acceptable, but not this. Christine Tomavitch: Ms. Tomavitch testified that she is a realtor in Lakewood and that individuals in the neighborhood have had a right to quiet enjoyment of their homes. She testified that approval of the application would impact the reasons people move there and would have the potential to affect purchase decisions. Holly Heaton: Ms. Heaton testified that the proposal was not really for a church use and that it did not fit with the surrounding residential neighborhood. She testified to her concern with the noise which would come from the traffic to a Wal-Mart-sized building and parking lot, including motor vehicle exhaust, and that existing impacts to the neighborhood would be compounded. She further testified that the Church has become a mega-church; a business, and not an appropriate neighbor. Archibald Gibbard: Testified in opposition to the application. Julia Parasian: Ms. Parasian is a neighbor of the Subject Property. She testified to her concern with congestion and lighting and lights, and the view into her bedroom from the proposed educational building. She further testified that it is not clear what the proposed use of the property would be. 26. Standard of Review. Code Section 26-114.D establishes nine criteria for evaluation of a special use permit application. The Code Section requires that all nine criteria be met: [1.] Will not have a detrimental effect upon the general health, welfare, safety and convenience of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. [2] Will not create or contribute to blight in the neighborhood by virtue of physical or operational characteristics of the proposed use. [3] Will not adversely affect the adequate light and air, nor cause significant air, water or noise pollution. [4] Will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards, or unsafe parking, loading, service or internal traffic conflicts to the detriment of persons whether on or off the site. [5.] Will be appropriately designed, including setbacks, heights, parking, bulk, buffering, screening and landscaping, so as to be in harmony and compatible with the character of the surrounding areas and neighborhood, especially with adjacent properties. 6 [6] Will not overburden the capacities of the existing streets, utilities, parks, schools and other public facilities and services. [7] History of compliance by the applicant with Code requirements and prior conditions, if any, regarding the subject property. [8] Ability of the applicant or any permitted successor-in-interest to continuously meet the conditions of the proposed permit. [9] Other factors relevant to the specific application 27. Based upon the testimony and evidence received at the public hearing, the Council makes the following findings with respect to the application's compliance, or lack thereof, with requirements of Code Section 26-114.D: [1.] Will not have a detrimental effect upon the general health, welfare, safety and convenience of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The Council finds that this criterion is not met. The general health, welfare, safety and convenience of persons in the neighborhood would be negatively impacted by granting of the application, as a result of the increase in the present unacceptable level of traffic congestion, parking in neighborhood streets, noise and air pollution from idling vehicles. See also testimony of Mark Larkin, Pete Klammer, Tom Radigan, Sheila Bardwell and Holly Heaton. [2.] Will not create or contribute to blight in the neighborhood by virtue of physical or operational characteristics of the proposed use. The Council finds that this criterion is not met. The Staff Report describes blight as "a combination of physical, environmental and safety factors." (Staff Report, p. 7). The Council finds that the increased traffic and associated air pollution from the expansion of the Church campus would have a blighting influence on health and safety of residents of the neighborhood. See also testimony of Pete Klammer, Mike Larkin, Sheila Bardwell and Ralph and Debbie Perri. [3] Will not adversely affect the adequate light and air, nor cause significant air, water or noise pollution. The Council finds that this criterion is not met. The Staff Report notes that given the mass of the proposed structure there may be a negative impact on the light and air to adjacent properties, and that there may be air and noise pollution generated by vehicles entering and exiting the expanded parking area. The public testimony supports this conclusion. In particular, the testimony established that current levels of noise and air pollution from the existing operation are a significant detrimental impact on the surrounding neighborhood. See testimony of Tiffany Barnhart, Ralph and Debbie Perri, and Holly Heaton. [4.] Will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards, or unsafe parking, loading, service or internal traffic conflicts to the detriment of persons whether on or off the site. The Council finds that this criterion is not met. The Council is particularly concerned with the volume and safety of pedestrian traffic crossing 32nd Avenue. The Council finds that this situation is presently unsafe, with a major educational building north of 32"d Avenue and the sanctuary complex south of 32nd Avenue. The Council finds that pedestrian safety is already at risk as a result of this configuration of the Church's campus. The Council finds that this unsafe situation would be further compounded were the Application to be approved. The proposal would significantly increase pedestrian traffic across 32nd Avenue. The Council finds that the crossing guards which are presently employed to control pedestrian traffic across 32nd Avenue on Sundays are presently not effective. The Council further finds that installation of a traffic light would not sufficiently ameliorate this hazard, as the volume of people needing to cross 32nd Avenue within a short period of time would have the potential to overpower and ignore the traffic light. The Council further finds that 32nd Avenue, as a collector street, is not an appropriate street for the volume of pedestrian crossing which would be increased as a result of the Application. The Council finds that this present unsafe situation would only be exacerbated by approval of the Application. This finding is also supported by the testimony of Mark Larkin, Tiffany Barnhart, Sheila Bardwell and Meredith Reckert. [5.] Will be appropriately designed, including setbacks, heights, parking, bulk, buffering, screening and landscaping, so as to be in harmony and compatible with the character of the surrounding areas and neighborhood, especially with adjacent properties. The Council finds that this criterion is not met. The R-1 single family neighborhoods on the east and west are already impacted by the size and intensity of the present church use. Additional traffic, pedestrians, lighting, and activity throughout the week, including weekends, associated with an additional large educational building is an unacceptable and negative impact to those neighborhoods, out of character and scale to their reasonable expectations The testimony of the Church established that, while it was expected the heaviest use of the new educational building would be on Sunday and on Wednesday evenings, the Church could not guarantee, and in fact admitted, that the building could be used on other days of the week as well. The Church's testimony established that the new education building would contain 14 classrooms. This is equivalent to an elementary school. While elementary schools are often found in residential neighborhoods, the proposal is, in effect, to add an elementary school-level impact to the present impact of a church which draws membership from an area considerably greater than the City of Wheat Ridge. 8 Granting the Application would increase the total square feet of the Church's complex in this neighborhood to approximately 83,000 square feet, combined with a parking lot approximately the size associated with a "big box" retailer. This size and intensity of use, out of scale to that of a neighborhood church, is incompatible with the surrounding residential neighborhood. The Church's testimony established that the multi-purpose gymnasium room could be used on any day of the week, and, significantly, could be rented by non-church members for non-church activities. The Council finds that the Application thus proposes the equivalent of an elementary school and event center, the latter unrelated, on any given day, to the Church function itself. The Council finds that the total impact of all of these proposed uses is out of proportion to and incompatible with the character of the surrounding areas and neighborhood. This finding is also supported by the testimony of Tiffany Barnhart, Dan Barnhart, Julie Parasian, Ralph and Debbie Perri, Holly Heaton, and Stanley Pouw. [6.] Will not overburden the capacities of the existing streets, utilities, parks, schools and other public facilities and services. The Council finds that this criterion is not met. The testimony established that congestion exists on existing streets at present as a result of the present Church activities. The traffic report was completed using the average attendance at Sunday services, with a projected 10% increase per year. Accordingly, the additional traffic impact will double in ten years, and so on. The traffic report states that additional Church members are bussed in from a remote location. This adds to the cumulative impact which would further overburden existing streets and impose an unreasonable, increasing impact upon those facilities. This finding is also supported by the testimony of Pete Klammer, Tom Radigan, Fred Lantz, and Sheila Bardwell. [7] History of compliance by the applicant with Code requirements and prior conditions, if any, regarding the subject property. The Council finds that this criterion has been met. The Staff Report (page 8) indicates that a search of the City's Code Enforcement Records shows that there was one zoning code violation in 2003 relating to a dumpster enclosure. That violation was abated in a timely manner. [8.] Ability of the applicant or any permitted successor-in-interest to continuously meet the conditions of the proposed permit. The Council finds that this criterion is inapplicable as the Council has denied the Application. 9 [9.] Other factors relevant to the specific application. The Council finds that Code Section 26-114(A) is relevant to the Application. That Section sets forth the purpose governing review of special use applications: Special uses are discretionary uses which, if properly designed, developed, operated and maintained, may be approved for any specific location within a zone district wherein the special use is enumerated. The primary issues to be addressed are those related to justification of need and special design and operational considerations which mitigate potential detrimental impacts of a special use on surrounding land uses, the street system, or public services or facilities. In order to protect the public interest, a special use may be approved, approved with conditions or denied. Under this Code Section, one of the primary issues to be addressed is justification of need for the permit. The Church testified that the use of the existing educational building was heaviest on Sundays and Wednesday evenings, but did not testify as to overcrowding or space need problems on these days or the remaining days of the week. The Church failed to demonstrate a need for the additional building square footage that, without any evidence presented to the contrary, conceivably could be accommodated by, for example, more efficient scheduling of the existing educational building or means other than building a 35,685 square-foot addition. The Church could not readily identify the proposed specific Church or other uses of the proposed building. Questions from Council and staff concerning the use of the building were given vague or broad answers such as "educational programs or youth group meetings." The Church failed to clearly demonstrate why there is a shortage of space at the existing building, failed to clearly identify the use(s) and purpose(s) of the building addition and, therefore, did not justify the need for the new building. 28. The Council finds that the proposed use of the education building, even as described by the Church, is only partially related to the Church's religious function. By admission of the Church's representatives themselves, the proposed education building multi-purpose room would be available for rental by non-church members for non- church activities, whenever that space was available. The Church testified that the primary use of the education building and multi-purpose room would be on Sundays and Wednesday evenings, but could not readily identify programming uses specific to most days of the week. The Council finds and concludes that the building and its multi- purpose room would be available for non-church activities. 29. The Council finds that the fourteen classrooms proposed for the new educational building, with the associated multi-purpose room or gym, bathrooms and a kitchen, as well as the associated parking, effectively create the impact of an elementary school in this neighborhood. The Council finds that while elementary schools can be compatible with residential neighborhoods, the combination of this 10 elementary school equivalent new use and associated large parking lot renders the Application out of harmony and incompatible with the surrounding neighborhood. 30. The Council finds that the safety of pedestrians and motorists in this neighborhood is of prime concern. The Council finds that safety is presently compromised due to the unusual configuration of this large church campus being separated by a busy collector street. It is this physical configuration which creates a significant threat to public health, welfare and safety, which is not sufficiently ameliorated by the proposed street crossing signal. The Council finds, based upon the evidence in the record, that approval of the application would exacerbate the present unsafe situation and thereby further compromise public safety. 31. The Council finds that the Application proposes a non-residential use in a residential area; that traffic and other impacts on the site, combined with poor pedestrian planning and the fact that pedestrians will take the most direct exit from and to the various buildings on the North and South Parcels of the Church campus, rather than the safest route, renders the proposal unsafe. The Council further finds that the growth of this church has already negatively impacted the neighborhood and that approval of the application would not be compatible with the neighborhood. 32. The Council finds that the factors set forth in Code Section 26-114 for review of special use applications are each a compelling governmental interest, and that the Application has failed, for the reasons described above, to protect those interests. DECISION Based upon the foregoing findings and its review of the evidence and testimony, the City Council hereby denies the Application of Applewood Baptist Church for a special use permit to allow expansion of an education building as ancillary to a church in an R-1 zone district located at 11225 West 32nd Avenue in Wheat Ridge, Colorado, Case Number SUP-06-04. APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Wheat Ridge City Council this 8th day of January, 2007. Jerry DiTullio, Mayor ATTEST: Christa Jones, Acting City Clerk 11 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I certify that on January , 2007, a true and correct copy of the foregoing FINDINGS AND DECISION was placed in the United States mail, postage prepaid, and addressed to: Applewood Baptist Church 11200 West 32nd Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Stanley Pouw Pouw & Associates Inc. 190 E. 9th Avenue, #250 Denver. CO 80203 Thomas MacDonald 95017 th Street, #160 Denver, CO 80202 12 OTTENJOHNSON ROBINSON NEFF+RAGONETTI. December 28, 2006 VIA E-MAIL AND U.S. MAIL Gerald E. Dahl Murray, Dahl, Kuechenmeister & Renaud, LLP 2401 15th Street, Suite 200 Denver. CO 80202 Re: City of Wheat Ridge SUP-06-04 Dear Jerry: THOMAS MACDONALD 303 575 7520 MAC@OTTENJOHNSON. DOM Our firm has been engaged to represent Applewood Baptist Church (the "Church"), the applicant in the above-referenced special use application (the "Application"). On December 11, 2006, the Wheat Ridge City Council ("City Council") voted to deny the Application. Somewhat confusingly, City Council then directed you to prepare findings for approval at a later meeting. As you know, the time period for challenging a denial of a special use application under state law is thirty days from the final decision. Please clarify whether the voice vote on December 11. 2006, constitutes a final decision or whether City Council retains jurisdiction to further consider the matter after you have prepared findings. To the extent the December 11, 2006, vote constitutes a final decision by City Council, the decision violates the Wheat Ridge Municipal Code (the "Code"), Colorado law and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc ("RLUIPA"). fhe staff report prepared in connection with the Application contains the following findings of fact: This request for an administrative special use meets all applicable conditions as required by Section 26-114 of the City of Wheat Ridge Code of Laws. City Council Staff Report, p. 9. Based upon this finding alone, it is apparent that the denial violates both the Code and state law. More importantly, however, the decision violates Section 2(a)(1) of RLUIPA which prohibits a government from imposing or implementing a land use regulation in a manner that imposes a substantial burden on the religious exercise of a person, including a religious assembly or institution, unless the government demonstrates that imposition of burden on that person, assembly or institution is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest and is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest. 950 SEVENTEENTH STREET SOME 1600 DENVER COLORADO 80202 P 303 825 84DO F 303 825 6525 W OIIENIOHNSON.COM DENVER ASPEN STEAMEDAT SPRINGS A Gerald E. Dahl December 28, 2006 Page 2 None of the reasons for denial set forth in the minutes of City Council's December 11, 2006, meeting constitutes a compelling governmental interest. Even if one of the reasons could be construed as a compelling governmental interest, each reason was addressed by the proposed conditions of approval recommended by the city staff. Given that Section 26-114(E) of the Code authorizes City Council to impose conditions upon a special use approval, it is obvious that an outright denial was not the least restrictive means available to City Council for addressing its concerns. During the hearing, the Church expressed its willingness to comply with each of the recommended conditions proposed by Staff, although the Church believes the first proposed condition, recommending that the special use be a personal grant to the use of the Applicant and not run with the land, violates Section 2(b) of RLUIPA which prohibits government from imposing a land use regulation in a manner that discriminates against any assembly or institution on the basis of religion or religious denomination. In any event, that condition was not directed at any of the stated reasons for denial. As the Staff Report indicates, the Church has owned its property in Wheat Ridge since the 1960s, and the City has become increasingly more restrictive in the uses that it will permit on the property. Those restrictions and the December I I denial constitute a substantial burden on the religious exercise of the Church and its members. If the Church is forced to pursue its rights under RLUIPA, it will also assert other claims against the city. For example, if the Code gives City Council authority to deny the Application even though it satisfies all criteria for approval of a special use, as the staff found, then the Code runs afoul of the Free Exercise and Free Speech Clauses of the federal and state constitutions by vesting City Council with unbridled discretion to regulate expressive religious conduct. The Church would prefer not to have to sue the city. It is an integral part of the Applewood community. Many of its members come from within the community. It does not lightly undertake a legal challenge to the city. The denial, however, threatens the Church's core religious mission and its ability to provide religious education to its members. Therefore, Church representatives have asked me to convey to you the Church's firm resolution to pursue its rights under RLUIPA and the federal and state constitutions. Representatives of the Church will conduct a meeting shortly after the new year in order to discuss these matters. We respectfully request that City Council reconsider its decision. Very truly yours, Macdonald Thomas a V for the Firm 1TM/mb )071]6 1 cc: Pastor Calvin Wittman (e-mail) L. William Schmidt (e-mail) of wHear ITEM NO: m REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION c~CORP~O COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 11, 2006 TITLE: A REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW EXPANSION OF AN EDUCATION BUILDING AS ANCILLARY TO A CHURCH IN AN R-1 ZONE DISTRICT LOCATED AT 11225 W. 32ND AVENUE (SUP-06-04/APPLEWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH) ® PUBLIC HEARING ❑ BIDS/MOTIONS ❑ RESOLUTIONS Quasi-Judicial: Yes ❑ ORDINANCES FOR 1 ST READING ❑ ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING 1-1 No Community Development Director City Manager EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Applewood Baptist Church is requesting approval of a special use permit for the property located at 11225 W. 32nd Avenue. The property is currently zoned R-1, Residential-One and has an existing 24,815 square foot education building, parking and landscaping on it. The applicant wishes to construct a 35,685 square foot addition to the existing education building with expanded parking and landscaping. The subject parcel is 6.85 acres in size. This request is being heard on appeal of an administrative denial of the application. COMMISSION/BOARD RECOMMENDATION: A special use permit request starts as an administrative review. A ten-day public notice period begins during which comments maybe submitted in favor of or against the proposal. If any relevant objections are received during the public notice period, the request must be forwarded to City Council for review. Staff received 2 letters of objection regarding the request; therefore, it has been forwarded to City Council for review. STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES: One of the primary issues of controversy surrounding this request is traffic. Concern expressed both at the neighborhood meeting and in the letters of objection received was related to the existing traffic volumes on W. 32nd Avenue and the increase due to the expansion. Public Works has reviewed the traffic impact analysis and has concluded that W. 32" d Avenue can accommodate additional anticipated trips and that a westbound turn lane on 32"d Avenue is not needed. An item of concern of Staff's is the amount of pedestrian traffic that crosses 32nd Avenue between the main church and education building. W. 32nd Avenue is classified as a collector and carries roughly 8700 vehicle trips per week day (2001 count). The current pedestrian traffic is handled through church- provided crossing guards. Staff is recommending the installation of a pedestrian signal as a condition of approval and that it be installed prior to the issuance of a C.O. for the expanded building. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: 1. Approve the special use permit. 2. Deny the special use permit. 3. Continue the case for more information. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The City has received a one-time application fee for the land use application. The City will receive a one-time building permit fee and City use tax for the cost of the improvements to the property. RECOMMENDED MOTIONS: Option A: "I move to approve Case No. SUP-06-04, a request for approval of a Special Use Permit to allow expansion of an education building as ancillary to a church in an R-1 zone district at 11225 W. 32nd Avenue, for the following reasons: 1. This request for special use meets all applicable conditions as required by Section 26-114 of the City of Wheat Ridge Code of Laws. 2. Staff has received written comments in opposition to this request from two adjacent property owners. 3. All minimum development standards of the R-1 zone district regulations have been met. 4. The proposed design meets or exceeds the provisions of Section 26-501 (Off-street parking) and Section 26-502 (Landscaping) of the zoning and development code. 5. All agencies can serve the property with necessary upgrades. 6. There has been a history of compliance of the property with the provisions of the Zoning and Development Code. With the following conditions: The special use shall be a personal grant of use to the applicant, Applewood Baptist Church, and does not run with the land. 2. The SUP be limited to church-related education activities. A private school is not permitted under the purview of this SUP approval. 3. Upon reconstruction of the parking lot, the site be brought into conformance with today's standards for site lighting as indicated on the photometric plan. 4. At the time of building permit, a drainage plan and report, a grading and erosion control plan and civil design documents be submitted for review and approval. 5. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the education building addition, a pedestrian signal be installed on W. 32nd Avenue. Both the City of Wheat Ridge and City of Lakewood shall review and approve the design prior to installation and the City of Lakewood shall be responsible for maintenance." Option B: "I move to deny Case No. SUP-06-04, a request for approval of a Special Use Permit to allow expansion of an education building as ancillary to a church in an R-1 zone district at 11225 W. 32nd Avenue, for the following reasons: 1. There have been objections filed regarding the application. 2. There will be visual impacts on the neighborhood, as well as an increase in traffic on W. 32nd Avenue. 3. There will be a negative impact on the light and air to adjacent properties. 4. There will be air and noise pollution generated by vehicles entering and exiting the expanded parking area. 5. There will be unacceptable safety hazards to pedestrians and vehicles." Option C: "I move to continue Case No. SUP-06-04, a request for approval of a Special Use Permit to allow expansion of an education building as ancillary to a church in an R-1 zone district at 11225 W. 32"d Avenue, to the January 22, 2007 City Council meeting to give the applicant opportunity to provide the following additional information: 1. Size of the congregation. 2. Explanation of use of the existing facility. 3. Schedule of use for the existing facility for all days of the week. 4. Explanation of use of the proposed facility. 5. Schedule of use for the proposed facility. 6. Who is allowed to use the existing and proposed facilities. 7. Whether the traffic study needs to be updated to include all days of the week, not just Sundays and Wednesdays. 8. Vehicular and pedestrian traffic patterns related to the crossing of W. 32nd Avenue." Report Prepared by: Meredith Reckert, 303.235.2848 Reviewed by: Alan White Attachments: 1. City Council staff report (with exhibits) CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE m PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT C~CORP~O TO: City Council CASE MANAGER: Meredith Reckert CASE NO. & NAME: SUP-06-04/Applewood Baptist Church DATE OF MEETING: December 11, 2006 ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a Special Use Permit to permit expansion of an education building as ancillary to a church in an R-1 zone district LOCATION OF REQUEST: 11225W.32 nd Avenue APPLICANT: Applewood Baptist Church APPROXIMATE AREA: Overall campus site size (Wheat Ridge only): 6.85 acres PRESENT ZONING: R-1, Residential-One COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Single family detached residential (not to exceed 4 du's per acre) ENTER INTO RECORD: Q COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (X) CASE FILE (X) ZONING ORDINANCE Q DIGITAL PRESENTATION O SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS Location Map FCite Case No. SUP-06-04/Applewood Baptist Church All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to make a determination regarding this request. 1. REQUEST The applicant requests approval of a Special Use Permit to allow expansion of an education building as ancillary to a church in an R-1, Residential-One zone district on property located at 11225 W. 32nd Avenue (Exhibit 1 Letter of request). The R-1 zone district is a low density zoning category which allows primarily single family residential development. There are also a variety of recognized ancillary uses such as the keeping of household pets and special uses. Permitted special uses include government buildings with outside storage, bed and breakfast facilities and churches. Section 26-114. Special Uses defines the purpose of special uses as follows: "Special uses are discretionary uses which, if properly designed, developed, operated and maintained, may be approved for any specific location within a zone district wherein the special use is enumerated. The primary issues to be addressed are those related to justification of need and special design and operational considerations which mitigate potential detrimental impacts of a special use on surrounding land uses, the street system, or public services or facilities. In order to protect the public interest, a special use may be approved, approved with conditions or denied. " II. EXISTING CONDITIONS/ CASE HISTORY The campus of the Applewood Baptist Church is split between the City of Lakewood and the City of Wheat Ridge. The main sanctuary building with ancillary parking is located on the south side of 32nd Avenue in the City of Lakewood. The southern ownership appears comprised of around 5 acres and is bounded by 32nd Avenue on the north, Robb Circle on the west, W. 3151 Avenue on the south and Quail Street on the east. According to the Jefferson County Assessor's website, the church's ownership in Lakewood extends back until at least 1961. Existing on the north side of 32nd Avenue is an education building with an 8375 square foot building envelope, parking for 213 vehicles and a detention area. There are three existing curb cuts on 32nd Avenue into the various parking areas. (Exhibit 21 Existing conditions') The following is a legislative/project history of the property relating to improvements on the north side of West 32nd Avenue in the City of Wheat Ridge. It appears that the church had ownership of land on the north side of 32nd Avenue as long ago as 1969 with the earliest building permit activity on the property in 1972 when an existing barn on the property was remodeled into a youth center. A building permit was issued in 1980 for erection of a temporary classroom building and in 1983, a fill permit was issued for the placement of fill material on the western side of the property. A demolition permit was issued in 1984 for removal of a house on the property. A building permit for construction of the existing education building was issued on May 5, 1984. The proposed structure has a building footprint of 8375 square feet and was noted on the permit application Case No. SUP-06-04/Applewood Baptist Church as being 2-1/2 stories high with two full stories and a basement. Site improvements with the proposed structure included a new curb cut, construction of a small parking area to the northeast side of the structure, private sidewalks, drainage facilities and landscaping. No public hearing process was required for construction of the new building as at the time, churches and accessory structures were permitted uses in the R-1 zone district. The Certificate of Occupancy was issued on September 20, 1985. Another fill permit was issued on June of 1988 for construction of a parking lot to the west of the education building. On June 15, 1989, ordinance # 796 became effective which made churches conditional uses in the Residential-One zone district. Conditional uses were permitted uses which were subject to site plan review to ensure they were properly designed, developed, operated and maintained. Issues for design consideration included mitigation of potential impacts on surrounding land uses, street systems and public services or facilities. In 1990, a demolition permit was issued for a house on the western portion of property. In 1992, a fill permit was issued to allow placement of fill to the west of the existing parking lot. W. 32"d Avenue was reconstructed in 1992 by the City of Wheat Ridge. Case No. WV-93-6 was approved which vacated excess right-of-way from the 32 ad Avenue street reconstruction project back to the property owner. On April 4, 1996 Planning Commission approved Case No. CUP-96-1. The purpose of the CUP was for construction of additional parking (approx. 100 spaces) on the west half of the lot. The request was approved with the following conditions: 1. A six-foot high solid fence with a ten-foot strip of landscaping be installed along the western boundary; and 2. Vertical landscaping be installed along the north side of the parking lot. On July 17, 1996, a neighborhood meeting was held to discuss a potential conditional use application for construction of a sports complex to include a baseball field, two soccer fields and two tennis courts. No land use application for this request was filed. A building permit for construction of the parking lot approved pursuant to Case No. CUP-96-1 was issued in December of 1996. On April 10, 1997, a neighborhood meeting was held to solicit input regarding a pending CUP application. Subsequently, an application was made for approval of a CUP to allow the construction of a baseball field and volleyball pits as ancillary uses to the church. The intent of the application (Case No. CUP-97-3) was to allow the church to use the recreation amenities as part of their ministry but to allow DeEvelyn High School to use the baseball field for practices and home games. A public hearing regarding this request was held before Planning Commission on May 1, 1997. This case was continued so a compromise could be reached between the church and the neighborhood. On August 22, 1997, the Church submitted correspondence requesting withdrawal of the application. In February 2001, a revised zoning and development code was adopted which made churches special uses in all of the City's residential zone districts. Case No. SUP-06-04/Applewood Baptist Church On March 13, 2003, the church met with staff members to discuss submission of an application for a special use permit. Another item discussed was the requirement by the city for a consolidation plat. The consolidation plat would consolidate the two existing deed parcels into one. In May of 2003, City Council approved legislation modifying the special use permit process. Changes to the process included removal of the neighborhood meeting requirement, removal of the legal protest provision and removal of the Planning Commission public hearing. An application for SUP approval was to start as an administrative review. If one or more legitimate, written objections were filed against the application, the case would be scheduled for public hearing in front of City Council. On November 18, 2003, a neighborhood meeting to discuss the pending special use application was held at the Applewood Baptist Church facility. The proposed plan showed expansion of the education building to the north plus a future phase for a large worship center to the west of the education building. Parking was being shown as extending north to the existing floodplain line on the property. On January 12, 2004, City Council approved Case No. ZOA-03-15 which modified the land use process chart in the zoning and development code. The requirement for a pre-application neighborhood meeting for special use applications was included back into the legislative process. On January 14, 2004, the church submitted a land use application for approval of a two-lot consolidation plat. This case was to be reviewed concurrently with a pending review of a special use application due to traffic concerns. Any required land improvements and associated right of way necessitated by the expansion were to be reflected on the consolidation plat. On March 28, 2004 a neighborhood meeting was held regarding a revised SUP application. On April 13, 2004, another neighborhood meeting was held with the help of a facilitator from Jefferson County Mediation Services. Subsequent to this meeting, a smaller "committee" comprised of church members and neighbors met several times to attempt to negotiate a plan agreeable to all parties. In August of 2004 an application for SUP was submitted. A modified plan was proposed showing the addition extending to the west, instead of the north as shown previously. Parking was shown as being expanded to the north. A future sanctuary was not shown. The case was sent out on referral and comments regarding the application were sent back to applicant in September. No resubmittal ever occurred and the case was eventually withdrawn. On March 28, 2006 a neighborhood input meeting was held regarding expansion of the existing education building. See Section III of this report for persons in attendance and issues discussed. In May, applications for SUP and plat document were submitted. The plat component was taken to Planning Commission on October 19, 2006 and was approved to divide the 14 acres into two lots. (Exhibit 3, Subdivision plat) One condition was included in the approval and that was that parkland assessment be determined at the time of development of Lot 2 (rear lot). At the time of this writing, no development proposal has been submitted for Lot 2. III. SPECIAL USE PERMIT PROCESS Pursuant to Section 26-114, the Community Development Director has the ability to decide upon applications for administrative special use approval, without requirement for a public hearing, provided the following conditions are met: Case No. SUP-06-04/Applewood Baptist Church I . A completed application package has been submitted and fee paid; 2. The Community Development Department has notified adjacent property owners by letter notice and the site has been posted for at least ten (10) days; 3. No written objections have been received in such ten-day period; 4. The Community Development Director concludes that the criteria for approval, as set forth below, are substantially complied with and support the request. The Community Development Director can impose conditions or stipulations upon the approval, which may include physical design, operational, and maintenance considerations to ensure compliance with the criteria for review. The Community Development Director shall also decide the following: 1. Whether the SUP runs with the land in perpetuity; or, 2. Whether the SUP is personal to the applicant and may or may not be inherited; and /or, 3. Whether the SUP is granted only for a defined period, after which time the special use shall expire unless renewed subject to all of the requirements of this section. The mandatory pre-application neighborhood meeting was held on March 28, 2006. (Exhibit,4 Neighborhood Meeting Recap, Exhibit 5, Sign-Up sheet) Pursuant to the existing SUP process, notices of administrative review were sent to adjacent property owners and a posting occurred on the property for 10 days. Staff was in receipt of two letters of objection (Exhibit6, Perri letter, Exhibit 71 Barnhart letter). IV. PROPOSED PLAN A site plan, landscape plan, building elevations and photometric plan have been submitted for review (Exhibit, 8, Site development proposal). Development must adhere to the standards as dictated by the R-1, Residential-One, zone district regulations. All applicable development standards have been reviewed in accordance with the submitted plans, and have been met or exceeded. These development standards include lot coverage, landscaped area and quantities, parking requirements, height, architecture and exterior lighting. Lot coverage The R-1 zone district allows a maximum building coverage of 25%. Based on a lot area which is 6.85 acres (298,200 square feet), a total of 74,550 square feet of building footprint may be built. The site plan shows the combination of the existing education building (footprint of 8375 square feet) plus the addition (footprint of 14,389 square feet) for a total footprint of 22,764 square feet or 7.6%. Setbacks The R-1 zone district requires a minimum front setback of 30', minimum side yard setbacks of 15' and a rear setback of 20'. The proposed setbacks are 84' from the front property line (existing structure), 54' from the eastern side property line (existing structure), 70' from the western side property line and 203' from the rear (north) property line. Building The structure being proposed is an addition to the existing education building. The structure design "mimics" the look of the existing building with a connection between the two. This connection will Case No. SUP-06-04/Applewood Baptist Church accommodate handicapped accessibility with the inclusion of an elevator. The current education building is not accessible due to steps up into the structure and lack of an elevator. The R-1 zone district allows a building height of 35'. The following is a the definition of "Building Height" in the zoning and development code: "The vertical distance measured from the average elevation of the finished grade of the building to the highest point of the roof surface if a flat roof, or to the deckline of a mansard roof, or to the mean height level between eaves and ridge for a gable, hip, gambrel or other roof". Included on page 8 of the plan set is a calculation of this measurement with the average height of the structure at 35' to mid-roof, even though the vertical measurements of some walls exceed 35'. The architectural materials are red brick with white accents and similar roof and window treatments as the existing structure. Access/Circulation/ Parking There are currently three access points to W. 32nd Avenue. The eastern-most access point was installed when the education building was constructed and is 25' from the eastern property line. Another mid-property curb cut was built when the parking was expanded. When the newer parking area was added to the west in 1996, an additional curb cut was provided. There is a grade change between the adjacent lots which precludes vehicular movement between the two. The existing parking layout is depicted on the existing conditions map. (Exhibit 2, Existing conditions) The proposed plan will reduce the number of access points from three to two. The eastern-most cut will remain and a new curb cut will be constructed 150' east of the western property line. Staff has reviewed this second cut in proximity to Robb Circle to the south and has concluded that there is adequate distance between the two to avoid conflicting turning movements. The entire parking area will be reconfigured for more efficiency and opportunities for landscape installation. The eastern entrance currently extends north and terminates in a parking area east/northeast of the existing education building. The new configuration shows this drive aisle extending north to the expanded parking area behind the buildings. The parking area to the west of the existing structure is currently a hodge-podge of stall types including angled and head-in spaces. There is currently no landscaping in this front parking area. This area has been redesigned to have an orderly layout and provides large landscaped islands to "soften" the street view. From this front parking area, additional parking is accessible along the west side of the addition to the new parking area in the rear. There are currently 213 spaces provided. The proposed plan more than doubles the existing amount with 441 spaces. Twelve handicapped spaces have been provided which exceeds the city's requirement. Landscaping The code requires a minimum of 20% of the site to be landscaped. The proposed plan shows a landscaped coverage of 28.9%. The applicant has provided trees and shrubs in accordance with the non-residential requirements in the code of laws. Case No. SUP-06-04/Applewood Baptist Church A landscaped buffer is required along both the east and west property lines due to adjoining low density residential development. The code requires either a 6' high sold fence or a 15' wide landscaped buffer. Along the eastern property line, the landscape plan (sheet 6 of the plan set) shows a 15' wide buffer with a 6' high fence. A variety of coniferous trees are proposed in this area interspersed with deciduous trees and shrubs. There is an approximate 10' grade change between the edge of the western parking area and the western property line. The buffer along this property line is proposed at a minimum width of 30' width. No fence is shown along this property line but it will be planted with a row of deciduous trees. A row of deciduous trees and shrubs is provided along the north edge of the parking lot before it transitions into the detention pond. The landscape plan exceeds the standards for parking lot landscaping. Drainage A drainage pond has been provided which starts at the north edge of the parking lot and extends into the lot to the north. The approved plat document shows this pond as a being a shared detention easement. Public Works has approved a preliminary drainage plan. Other The applicants' representative could not provide an accurate number of the current church membership. However, it was indicated that the attendance on Sunday morning varies from 629 - 999 persons between the two morning services. A Sunday school schedule was provided with an interior floor plan guide. The floor plan includes structures on both sides of 32nd Avenue. (Exhibit 9, Sunday school schedule) Staff is aware that there are activities which occur on other days of the week as well although a schedule for those has not been provided. This information was requested by staff in a letter dated June 9, 2006. (Exhibit 10, June 9 2006 staff letter) V. SPECIAL USE PERMIT CRITERIA Before a Special Use Permit is approved, the applicant shall show, and the community development director or city council shall find that the proposed Special Use: 1. Will not have a detrimental effect upon the general health, welfare, safety and convenience of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. There will be visual impacts on the neighborhood, as well as an increase in traffic on W. 32"d Avenue. 2. Will not create or contribute to blight in the neighborhood by virtue of physical or operational characteristics of the proposed plan. The term "blight" can describe a wide array of problems that can range from the physical deterioration of buildings and the environment to health problems. Typically, it is a combination of physical, environmental and safety factors and can include the following: deteriorating structures, inadequate street layout, unsanitary conditions, deterioration of site, unusual topography, environmental contamination of building, endangerment of life by fire or other causes and inadequate public improvements or utilities. Based on this definition, it is questionable whether the proposed SUP will have a blighting influence on the neighborhood. Case No. SUP-06-04/Applewood Baptist Church 3. Will not adversely affect the adequate light and air, nor cause significant air, water or noise pollution. Given the mass of the proposed structure, there may be a negative impact on the light and air to adjacent properties. A drainage report will be required to ensure that stonn drainage does not impact the adjacent streets or properties. There may be air and noise pollution generated by vehicles entering and exiting the expanded parking area. 4. Will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards, or unsafe parking, loading, service of internal traffic conflicts to the detriment of persons whether on or off the site. The inefficient layout of the current parking area with the existing access points results in internal and external conflicts and confusion for the motorist. The reduction of curb cuts and redesigned layout will help the situation. Although the request will result in an increase in traffic in the area over a twenty year period, W. 32'd Avenue has adequate capacity to handle the increase. All of the City's parking requirements have been met. The primary concern for staff is the volume of pedestrian traffic crossing 32"d Avenue and the manner in which it is controlled. The current pedestrian traffic is handled through church- provided crossing guards. W. 32°d Avenue is classified as a collector and carries roughly 8700 vehicle trips per week day (2001 count). This is an unsafe situation and must be addressed prior to any expansion. 5. Will be appropriately designed, including setbacks, heights, parking, bulk, buffering, screening and landscaping, so as to be in harmony and compatible with the character of the surrounding areas and neighborhood, especially with adjacent properties. The property is surrounded by R-1 single family development on the east and west. To the north is vacant, R-1 zoned land recently sold to a private individual. The applicant has attempted to mitigate impacts to the neighborhood through increased landscaped buffering in the interior of the site and around the perimeter. With reconstruction of the parking, staff will be requiring the site lighting be brought into conformance with today's standards as indicated on the photometric plan. 6. Will not overburden the capacities of the existing streets, utilities, parks, schools and other public facilities and services. All responding utility agencies have indicated that they can provide service at the property owner's expense. There will be no impact to parks as a result of the expansion. History of compliance by the applicant with Code requirements and prior conditions, if any, regarding the subject property. A search of the City's code enforcement records has shown that there was one zoning code violation in 2003 past relating to a dumpster enclosure. The violation was abated in a timely manner. 8. Ability of the applicant or any permitted-in-interest to continuously meet the conditions of the proposed permit. If the conditions of an approved special use are violated, City Council has the authority to revoke the special use permit. Case No. SUP-06-04/Applewood Baptist Church 9. Other factors relevant to the specific application. There are no other relevant factors. VI. AGENCY REFERRAL All affected service agencies were contacted regarding the ability to serve the property. Specific referral responses follow. Wheat Ridge Fire Protection District: Can serve Consolidated Mutual Water District: Can serve with improvements at the property owners' expense. Wheat Ridge Police Department: No problems. Northwest Lakewood Sanitation District: Can serve with improvements at the property owners' expense. City of Lakewood: Has reviewed the traffic impact study and has identified no outstanding issues. Wheat Ridge Public Works Department: Has reviewed the traffic impact analysis and has concluded that W. 32nd Avenue can accommodate additional anticipated trips and that a westbound turn lane on 32nd Avenue is not needed. They are still concerned with pedestrian activity across W. 32nd Avenue. They believe the level of pedestrian activity warrants installation of a pedestrian crossing control signal which will be required as a condition of C.O. issuance of the new building. A preliminary drainage report has been approved. At the time of building permit, a drainage plan and report and grading and erosion control plan will be required, as will civil construction plans. Xcel Energy: Can serve. VII. STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Staff has made the following findings of fact regarding Case No. SUP-06-04: 1. This request for an administrative special use meets all applicable conditions as required by Section 26-114 of the City of Wheat Ridge Code of Laws. 2. Staff has received written comments in opposition to this request from two adjacent property owners. 3. All minimum development standards of the R-1 zone district regulations have been met. 4. The proposed design meets or exceeds the provisions of Section 26-501 (Off-street parking) and Section 26-502 (Landscaping) of the zoning and development code. 5. All agencies can serve the property with necessary upgrades. 6. There has been a history of compliance of the property with the provisions of the Zoning and Development Code. Case No. SUP-06-04/Applewood Baptist Church If a motion of APPROVAL is given, Staff recommends the following conditions: 1. The special use shall be a personal grant of use to the applicant, Applewood Baptist Church, and it does not run with the land. 2. The SUP be limited to church-related education activities. A private school is not permitted under the purview of this SUP approval. 3. Upon reconstruction of the parking lot, the site be brought into conformance with today's standards for site lighting as indicated on the photometric plan. 4. At the time of building permit, a drainage plan and report, a grading and erosion control plan and civil design documents be submitted for review and approval. 5. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the education building addition, a pedestrian signal be installed on W. 32" a Avenue. Both the City of Wheat Ridge and City of Lakewood shall review and approve the design prior to installation and the City of Lakewood shall be responsible for maintenance. Case No. SUP-06-04/Applewood Baptist Church 10 Meredith Reckert From: Leeanne DiGiacomo [leeannedigiacomo@mac.com] Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 8:24 AM To: Meredith Reckert Cc: Perri; David DiGiacomo; Dan Barnhart; Tiffany Barnhart; pklammer@comcast.net Subject: Applewood Baptist Church Meredith, I hope this message finds you well David and I own property in the City of Wheat Ridge at 4678/80 Swadley ST, and wish to have our comments included as the City Council considers a special use application from Applewood Baptist Church. Frankly, it doesn't make sense that the City of Wheat Ridge can't consider input from Lakewood residents as in this special case our Applewood neighborhood straddles the city boundary with Lakewood just as the church straddles the same boundary in the same manner. I hope that I am wrong, and Council will hear all comments from anyone who feels that they are impacted by this project proposal that would significantly impact our neighborhood. T understand that there is a hearing tonight (Monday, Dec. 11th) at the City Council, and that a decision will be made on Applewood Baptist Church's application for a special use permit. Unfortunately, it's not likely that either David or I will be able to attend as we are beginning our holiday travels (he gets on a plane late this evening). As you know, we have moved about six blocks away from our old home next door to ABC, but the size of the proposed project and expansion of the church and it's activities will negatively impact the whole neighborhood--including us. We have never understood why this project requires only a "special use permit," while a density change in a residential plat would require a more difficult process. I think that the meeting that I attended in may came on short notice, and was not well attended. I therefore believe that most of the neighborhood is not aware of the current plan, or the timing of the decision. I haven't even seen information in the church's own newsletter regarding this plan or process, at least not specifics that would help the reader know the proposal and timelines of the process. Because of the signage for a new housing development posted at Quail and 35th, I believe that neighbors think that a new housing development is going in, and that the church's plans have changed. I can only hope that word has spread because I know that many people would share my concerns, and they are as follows: 1. Having a "mega-church" in our neighborhood would forever change the character of our neighborhood with a negative impact. 2. My husband owned the property next to the church since 1978, living there from 1981 until 2006. The church has not been a good neighbor or steward of the neighborhood, and increasing the size will only make their presence worse. For example, in all of the years that there has been friction with the neighbors, you would think that they might have adopted a mile stretch along 32nd Ave. for cleanup in order to do something positive for the neighborhood and get along offer something back. But they haven't even done that, which, considering the size of their congregation wouldn't have taken a lot of effort. They don't even clean up the trash that blows around on their own large property. Their total contribution to our neighborhood?: They invite the neighborhood, along with anyone else who can read their signs along 32nd Ave. to a public party that they have every July, a relatively recent endeavor. 3. Their current building on the Wheat Ridge side is not in compliance with height restrictions. In order to pretend that they are in compliance, they installed a door (that is NEVER used) on the southeast side that sits at the top of a mound of backfill (and the whole building was built on fill), and then take the measurement from there. Now they propose that the new building matches that height. How can we trust that they won't go beyond what is approved by the City this time, and just do what suits them? 4. The drainage plan from last time around forever changed the drainage and vegetation on our former property at 3275 Quail ST, that shares about 450 feet of property line with the church. It's not just the drainage plan, but also that they installed grass that is watered regularly, with the runoff going onto our former property. What will all of the asphalt do to the drainage to Lena Gulch? With no vegetation on the higher ground to absorb water, then all moisture would run to the lower ground to the north end, to Lena Gulch eventually. 5. I know that there must have been a traffic study, but 32nd Ave. is a main thoroughfare for bicycles, especially on weekends, when church building use is in full swing. My husband was hit by a car while riding his bicycle at 32nd and Simms on March 9, 2004. This morning, as I finish writing this, bicyclists are sitting at the Starbuck's in Golden, having ridden in from Denver along 32nd Ave., unaware of the ABC proposal to add a lot of cars to their route-- especially on the weekends. 6. This area of our neighborhood also sees many pedestrians, especially children due to the elementary school, the RTD bus route that transports many young people to and from school, and our neighborhood swimming pool and tennis courts. My own experience while pushing a stroller or walking by myself, is that many of the church's parishioners are less than courteous drivers, or, to give them the benefit of the doubt, distracted drivers --the result is the same, pedestrian beware. 7. Cabela's: Because the City approved Cabela's, and we believe that that development will have a tremendous impact on our city and neighborhood, my husband told me not to be hopeful that the City Council will decide this current issue for the benefit of the community and neighborhood. I hope he's wrong. 8. School possibility: ABC has mentioned that they would like to eventually house a school on their property, and they have said that the design of the building would accommodate such a venture. We already have an elementary school a couple of blocks away. Schools necessarily condense traffic patterns at least twice a day (four times if 1/2-day kindergarten is held), and the traffic volume is increased at precisely the time that young pedestrians are walking to school. Such a school at ABC would not be a neighborhood school, but a school that would draw children from as far away as parents would be willing to drive them in --more traffic than a regular neighborhood school. If Council approves a change in the current plan, it should do so with the caveat that the buildings are never used for school (outside of Sunday school). Maybe Council couldn't make such a requirement stick, but perhaps they could get ABC to agree to this restriction (and other restrictions) in order to have their project approved. Additionally, we have a high number of immature drivers who frequent 32nd Ave between Wheat Ridge High School and Applewood shopping center throughout the day for staggered lunches. 9. Weddings, alcohol. OK, so people believe that Baptists don't drink alcohol. I guess that I haven't met enough Baptists to know the ones who don't drink. We don't want wedding receptions held at the new building because we don't want the crowds, additional traffic, and noise, especially on Friday nights and Saturday day and night. If the City approves the expansion, I don't believe that they can prohibit the wedding receptions or the serving of alcohol at the church in any of their buildings. 10. Unlike Cabela's there is no revenue generated --ABC, like any non-profit is even exempt from taxes associated with the building permit, and they take plenty of services, adding wear and tear to our roads, more for police, rescue, etc. In other words, this setup does nothing to benefit or improve our neighborhood, but instead just takes services and pays nothing. 11. Abatement: What happens when the church wants to move to another site? Who would purchase such a complex? Any other church that would have that kind of money would want to build their own church, or make more improvements to take this one . . . We want future use restricted. We want the zoning to be so tight as to never permit a commercial venture, office complex, shopping center, etc. on that site. I hope that the Council won't just say, "Well, that will be the decision of a future Council." 12. Aesthetics: Even moving that monster building sideways makes an ugly mess of our neighborhood. The size of the building, the amount of asphalt for parking, the absence of the green and golden field, etc--all an ugly change to our beautiful Applewood neighborhood. 13. Bus parking. The bus parking, if the project is approved, should be moved to the lowest area topographically to the back/north of the property. They'll do whatever they want anyway, but the buses should not be seen from 32nd Ave., and it's not right that neighbor who shares the greatest length of property line should have buses permanently parked along the west side of their property (the new owners, the Barnharts, of 3275 Quail ST). There's so much more that we object to, but the above items are the highlights. I'm sorry for my neighbors that I don't have time to be more thorough this morning, and I hope that 2 they will be well- represented tonight. Please remember that, although we now live in Lakewood, we remain property owners in the City of Wheat Ridge, and our comments should be included. I would like for Council to delay the decision, and insist on a neighborhood mediation with ABC in order to work out details of such a project if the City is leaning towards approval. If they are leaning towards denying the application in the interest of preserving our neighborhood, then they could just deny it outright tonight. My Best, Leeanne DiGiacomo 11516 W. 26th PL Lakewood, CO 80215 303.234.0162 property owned at 4678/80 Swadley ST, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 3 Page 1 of 1 Meredith Reckert From: Olga & Ross Casados [ocasados30@comcast.net] Sent: Saturday, December 09, 2006 11:59 AM To: Meredith Reckert Subject: re: Case number: SUP-06-04 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Red To Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner, My wife and I live at 32nd and Routt St. and we STRONGLY object to the "Special Use Permit" for the Applewood Baptist Church, because of the reasons listed below: 1. Traffic is already bad for East bound traffic, especially if you are turning onto 32nd from the north side streets. 2. There are no stop lights to allow a break in the flow of traffic east and west bound, thus resulting in backlog. 3. Cabella's will be opening soon and will add more traffic on 32nd as this is a continuous thoroughfare for East and West traffic. 4. By adding 380 more cars to a congested area already, this also threatens the lives of the Children going to Prospect Valley Elementary School. 5. Aren't religious institutions tax exempt? What monetary contribution is this facility going to make to the citizens and the City of Wheat Ridge? Sincerely, Ross and Olga Casados 3291 Routt Street Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 303-232-5877 12/11/2006 03/29/1997 04:12 303-233-2152 HESSIN PAGE 02 December 11, 2006 Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner City of Wheat Ridge Planning Division 7500 West 29 h Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 30033 Re: Case Number: SUP-0604 - Special Use Permit application to build another building on the north side of W. 32°d Ave. We are vehemently opposed to this type of development m our Applewood neighborhood. We live at 11610 W. 290i Place, three block south of 32"d Ave. on Simms St. from which we have been granted No protection from traffic because it is an access road for Wheat Ridge hospital, fire department, etc. traffic. When we built our boost here, our premise was that we were pmtected indefinitely from a commercial type complex being built in our neighborhood - this protection coming from elected officials, the law, etc. For all of the obvious objections, of which you are already aware, this application should be denied and put to bed permanently. Please, please deny this application, and let us live out the dream we have the for the area of Applewood. William and Anita Hessin 11610 W. 291" Place, Lakewood, Co 80215 e-mail: whessinafa cs.com FX: 303-233-2152 FROM FAX NO. : Oct. 21 2005 10:BBAM P3 The Apple wood Baptist Church does not have a right to build a mega entity in our lovely neighborhood and this has really become a David and Goliath issue. The David qualities are the citizens fundamental right to the quiet enjoyment of their homes. Goliath would try to impose a venture - commercial in size and motive - on a residential neighborhood where its huge footprint will cast a giant shadow, adding more noise, air pollution and destroying the very qualities that made us all move here. My church has a saying, "What blesses one, blesses all" which means if it is really the right thing then everyone will be benefited. Common sense tells us this is not the case. When this issue last surfaced and following a conversation with a member of the Wheat Ridge City Council, I was told that churches can "pretty much do what they want to" because of a federal law, RLUIPA. I contacted a constitutional lawyer Marci Hamilton who specializes in this type of problem and when I shared what I had been told, she said: "This is simply untrue. They need to read the recent decision in the 9u" Circuit: San Jose Christian College v. Morgan Hill. Before RLUIPA applies, the church has the burden of proving land use laws impose a "substantial burden" on its religious exercise." The Morgan Hill case (which relies on the 7th Cir case in C.L.U.B. v City of Chicago) sets a high standard (the right standard) and I don't see anything in the facts you describe indicating the church can meet this standard. If it can't, RLUIPA is out of the picture altogether." Ms. Hamilton continues, "The council should be made to understand that if it gives to this church any special preference vis-a-vis the land use laws (i.e., a pass), it will have to do the same thing for every future request from any religious institution or religious homeowner operating services out of their home. In addition, residential neighborhoods in these situations are starting to sue the cities who favor the churches. The council need to read RLUIPA narrowly in order to navigate the likelihood of being sued by the church or the neighbors. If they don't like the situation they are in, they should contact their reps in Congress... who created this mess. The city council also needs to get better legal advice if their position is that they have to roll over." Since this decision will affect all the neighbors surrounding this church "forever", I ask that the vote be a resounding "no" to their request for this commercial expansion. Christine Tomovich December, 2006 FROM FAX NO. : Oct. 21 2005 10:07RM P2 (published in the Sentinel the last time this issue came up.) We are writing regarding the Applewood Baptist Church's upcoming request for a zoning variance from the City of Wheatridge. The church's plan to expand their facilities and parking lot to roughly three times its current size will require a special use permit in order to build on church acquired property currently zoned RI (single family residential). As members of the neighborhood group Applewood Families for Residential Values, we oppose this proposed expansion. The expansion master plan includes a 3-story 28,000 square foot education center in phase 1, and an 1800 seat worship center in phase 2. Over 500 additional parking spaces will have been added by the end of phase 2. The scale of this planned expansion is simply inappropriate for the Applewood residential neighborhoods adjacent to the church along 32 d Avenue (which borders both Wheatridge and Lakewood). It is similar to having a large retail operation with the accompanying parking, traffic and noise issues inserted into a quiet residential neighborhood. In conversations between AFRV members and city officials, the Federal law which regulates a church's right to worship as it pertains to zoning regulations has, been cited many times. Although the church may try to use this law to convince the council that this Federal law, RLUIPA, will fall in their favor, case history shows that is not happening. We would hope that the Wheat Ridge City Council and the mayor become more familiar with RLUIPA which is not intended to allow churches to overture local city ordinances. Gary and Christine Tomovich Lakewood, Colorado Page 1 of 2 Meredith Reckert From: Pete Kammer [pkiammer@comcast.net] Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 12:13 PM To: 'Leeanne DiGiacomo'; Meredith Reckert Cc: 'Perri'; 'Dan Barnhart'; dave@digiacomojaggers.com Subject: RE: ABC motions for tonight Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Red I urge no I DEMAND that my elected representatives defend our neighborhood and its residential qualities, by denying the church's special use permit request, and inviting them to find a more appropriate venue for their business. I had one conversation with the pastor, trying to explain my opposition to their mega-church campus. He cynically asked me, what would I rather have, more houses with campers, like the Patricks behind our place? That about made my blood boil. In the first place, the Patricks are neighbors, not strangers, and we recognize each other, not like outsiders who zoom in once a week, don't know or couldn't care if they see my dog or kid in their way on the sidewalk; yes, dammit, I would rather have a hundred Patricks than one more snooty pastor on the other side of my fence! In the second place, the Patricks have been here years, if not decades, before me, have paid in more to the Wheat Ridge tax base than I have something you can't say for the church, can you? and as far as I'm concerned, I owe it to them to respect their lifestyle at least as much as the other way around. I truly resent the church's attempt to turn neighbors against each other. This church is a bad actor in this neighborhood; it does not act in good faith; it does not keep promises and commitments to its neighbors; it is devious and crafty in manipulation to get its way. We are not comfortable in ANY way that the representations before the city and community will bear any relation whatsoever to their ultimate plans and goals and final impact upon this residential district indeed, it is not in their interest for the district to remain residential; they are institutionally indifferent to the residential qualities of the vicinity. We were told, by the Pastor of this church, in public hearing, that the church would be "happy" to keep the neighbors apprised of their expansion plans if we would only subscribe to their newsletter. I have received multiple announcements of sunday schools and picnics and christmas chorales, all in four-color with smiley portraits, but the expansion project is off that radar. Broken promise. I was startled early one morning to hear earth-moving equipment and a semi trailer in the parking lot I have a photo of this; I made Meredith aware of it and apparently the church was initiating some ground contour changes without a city permit. Shifting machinery around after dark after midnight! Stealth and deception. The public meetings that the church has been able to host and schedule, in one case it did so on a jewish holiday, and another on a general election night with the obvious consequence of depressed attendance. Clever, crafty manipulation. By its nature, the site plays two municipalities off each other, with never any proper accountability for the whole. Both Lakewood and Wheat Ridge traffic departments have admitted to me, in off-record conversations, that such an inconvenient and hazardous site plan would never be approved entirely within either jurisdiction. Think of it: could Fatima put all their parking on the opposite side of 20th from their sanctuary? Could Walgreens have gotten their new store approved if their customers were streaming back and forth across 32nd? But the plans and proposals and photos to Wheat Ridge don't reveal the extent of activity in Lakewood they don't have to, do they? And the permits for structures and parking in Lakewood don't include full impact of the Wheat Ridge developments, do they? Does the church have any application in process in Lakewood at this moment for the burden they are proposing to add to Lakewood residents by this expansion on the Wheat Ridge side? OF COURSE NOT! Devious, crafty, and exploitative. I hope the Wheat Ridge council understands budgets and allocation and burden-sharing and hard choices. The 12/11/2006 Page 2 of 2 residential community on 32nd Avenue is already reeling from the oncoming wave of traffic that Cabela's will bring the documented numbers, undoubtedly sugar-coated as they are, are daunting, challenging, intimidating. But the city has already made that hard choice, I don't see any chance of deflecting the hundreds of vehicles per day that you have budgeted from our neighborhood. Having made that choice, having spent that budget, having taken that bite out of our part of the city, don't take more. Look elsewhere; let some other neighborhoods take a turn, share the load; BE FAIR! It's in your power to preserve or destroy the residential quality of our neighborhood. Just say no. It's the wrong thing in the wrong place at the wrong time. Pete Klammer, P.E. / ACM(1970), IEEE, ICCP(CCP), NSPE(PE), NACSE(NSNE) 3200 Routt Street / Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033-5452 (303)233-9485 / Fax:(303)274-6182 / Mailto:PKlammer@ACM.org Idealism doesn't win every contest; but that's not what I choose it for." From: Leeanne DiGiacomo [mailto:leeannedigiacomo@mac.com] Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 10:47 AM To: mreckert@ci.wheatridge.co.us Cc: Perri; Dan Barnhart; dave@digiacomojaggers.com; pklammer@acm.org Subject: ABC motions for tonight Meredith, Ralph Perri sent me a copy of the does for tonight. Under conditions, can you specify that the SUP does not include approval for a private or public school? I think that it's important that neither is approved. Our Charter Schools are "public schools," and I don't want ABC to have a Charter School or any kind of school there for all of the reasons mentioned in my earlier email. I am still opposed to the whole project. Leeanne 12/11/2006 December 5, 2006 Wheat Ridge City Council Members: I live in the most northern block of Lakewood bordering on 32°d Street. The Applewood Baptist Church is again trying to diminish the quality of our residential neighborhood with a second plan of addition changes and hearings. My block on Oak Street has been well-maintained for its lifetime with many original owners still living here. My husband and I built our home as the 2d house on this street. We raised our four children into responsible, professional adults following their graduation from Wheat Ridge High School. It is distressing to go through Applewood Baptist's second attempt to downgrade our residential area resulting in greater traffic, parking problems, noise, street blockage and other results of congestion. During their first meeting with the community and Council, it was questioned why the church planners had not built in a more rural area with sufficient land to start with, rather than try and diminish the living conditions of those who had settled here. Please again deny this church permission to ruin our neighborhood. If I am correct, the city of Wheat Ridge will not be gaining tax money from a church. I am not anti-church, having belonged to another Lakewood church for 35 years as an active member. Jean P. Griffith 3031 Oak Street Lakewood, CO 80215 n~ G'>'"'~. 30 On €*S Dec 08 06 03:33p TOM RADIGRN 303-202-3610 p.1 Karen Adams Wheat Ridge Councilor 303-484-1503 Office 303-484-1027 Fax Dear Ms. Adams; This letter is in response to the Special Use Permit (SUP 06-04) for expansion of the church education facility submitted by the Applewood Baptist Church (ABC). In the past, ABC has initiated several neighborhood meetings to discuss this phased expansion of their facility in an R-I zoned area. In order to facilitate the decision process by the City Planners and Leaders and avoid an opprobrious public response, several important factors are offered for your consideration: 1. ABC leaders have indicated that their existing worship center on the south side of 32ndAvenue is at or near capacity on Sundays for their approximately 3,000 members (2003 info). 2. ABC has indicated that the existing education center is utilized fully only on Sundays and Wednesday nights; And occasionally for special events on other days. 3. ABC acknowledged that up to 50% of its current Sunday attendees live outside the Lakewood and Wheat Ridge neighborhoods and that up to 90% of the attendees drive to events. 4. An effective, useful traffic impact study is not mandated by City regulations because ABC in this phase has not altered the size of the worship center. 5. The education center expansion in this phase will include approximately 227 additional parking spaces added to the existing 213 parking spaces. 6. The ABC traffic impact study presented to the neighborhood assumes only a 20% increment in traffic without any increase in the worship center membership. The study should assume a 100% increase in traffic flow consistent with the 106% increase in parking on the north side of 32"dAve and facility utilization on at least five days a week including Sundays and Wednesday nights. Wheat Ridge Public Works has relied upon this flawed traffic study to arrive at its conclusions. "Dec ,08 06 03:34p TOM RRDIGRM 303-202-3610 p.2 7. The new, three-story education building will add approximately 35,685 sq. ft. at a cost approximating $4 million to the existing building approximating 24,815 sq. ft., creating a mega complex approximating 60,500 sq. ft. 8. The education complex, when finished will consist of two connected, red brick buildings with a similar industrial appearance the size of an average Wal-Mart. 9. The ABC membership will have to expand above 3,000 members to fully utilize the new mega education complex. 10. City regulations do not restrict subsequent expansion or development on the site. 11. City regulations do not restrict seven day a week use by ABC. 12.The mega education complex resides in a school zone and could be operated currently with the neighborhood school traffic. 13.At current traffic levels, the pedestrian crossing on 32" dAvenue presents an unacceptable safety hazard. 14.The neighborhood residences previously expressed concerns about the outdoor lighting plans, the draining sensitive area around Lena Gulch, the industrial appearance of the mega complex, the increased traffic flow, the hazardous pedestrian crossing on 32"dAvenue and the unannounced future development plans of ABC. We implore the City Leaders to consider thoughtfully the factual concerns of the neighborhood, the considerable opposition expressed by the neighbors, the surreptitious plan of this Special Use Permit and the incongruous nature ofthis mega education complex. Sincerely, Catherine Henry, Tom Radigan ~i c 10845 W. 32nd Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 CC: Meredith Reckert, AICP Meredith Reckert From: Kenfield, Allen [allenk@realestatedenver.com] Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 3:35 PM To: Meredith Reckert Cc: Perri, Ralph Subject: SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLEWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH Meredith, I have only recently been made aware of the hearing tonight before city council of the Special Use Permit allowing the construction of an additional 35,000+ square foot classroom building on the North side of 32nd Ave. by Applewood Baptist Church. I am strongly opposed to such a massive addition to the church complex in the center of a residential area. T believe the intent of the Special Use Permit process is being greatly abused. The addition of such a large structure with the addtional auto traffic and pedestrian traffic it will create surely should require the full notification and input of the entire surrounding neighborhood. This includes both Wheatridge and Lakewood residents in the spirit of good neighbor relations. I would urge city council to continue this case until proper input from the entire community can be obtained and evaluated. Sincerely, Allen Kenfield (Property Owner) 12290 W 31st P1. Wheatridge, Colo. No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.15/581 - Release Date: 12/9/2006 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge CITY COUNCIL on December 11, 2006, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the Municipal Building at 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. The following petition shall be heard: Case No. SUP-06-04: An application filed by Applewood Baptist Church for approval of a Special Use Permit to allow expansion of an educational facility on R-1 zoned property located at 11225 W. 32nd Ave and legally described as follows: Lot 1, Applewood Baptist Church Subdivision. Kathy Field, Administrative Assistant ATTEST: Pamela Y. Anderson, City Clerk To Be Published: Wheat Ridge Transcript Date: November 23, 2006 POSTING CERTIFICATION CASENO. PLANNING CONMSSION CITY COUNCIL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (Circle One) HEARING DATE: / O I, residing at as the applicant for Case No.5 - 06- ,I0 , hereby certify that I have posted the Notice of Public Hearing at i i 225 W , 32 hd Ave (location) on this -IL day of ! rS-~ 20 ©,6 , and do hereby certify that said sign has been posted and remained in place for fifteen (15) days prior to and including the scheduled day of public hearing of this case. The sign was posted in the position shown on the map below Signature: NOTE: This form must be submitted at the public hearing on this ase and will be placed in the applicant's case file at the Department of Planning and Developr4ent. L ' W 3 r z R-1A R-1 x - - aim FT 'PELT x" V LEY H EM 5C i001 I -1 U ~ i ' ' F Q r ~ . m m m s " A cin urin a rr uM m N 2 Page 1 of 2 Meredith Reckert From: Steve Nguyen Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 11:13 AM To: Tim Paranto; Alan White; Meredith Reckert; Dave Brossman Subject: FW: Applewood Baptist Church - 11200 W. 32nd Avenue - Proposed Expansion Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Red Hi All, FYI. 5lc~.en/Ugvye~ Giry oll4/FeafGge pu6% ~l/o~~s Depadrie~f From: David Baskett [mailto:DavBas@lakewood.org] Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 9:50 AM To: Steve Nguyen Cc: Jim Richey Subject: RE: Applewood Baptist Church - 11200 W. 32nd Avenue - Proposed Expansion Steve, We would not have a problem with maintaining a puslibutton actuated ped crossing light. Assuming a mastarm installation with LED heads and one street light laminar on top of one of the poles. Would need to be built to Lakewood standards if we are to maintain. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Steve Nguyen [mailto:snguyen@ci.wheatridge.co.us] Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 9:05 AM To. David Baskett Subject: Applewood Baptist Church - 11200 W. 32nd Avenue - Proposed Expansion Dave, As you may be aware, the Applewood Baptist Church proposed to expand its facility through a special use permit process through the City of Wheat Ridge. John Padon from your office had been working with Wheat Ridge on this. The Applicant has resolved most of the concerns associated with the expansion with exception of the pedestrian activity on 32nd Avenue. Wheat Ridge is concerned with the pedestrian activity associated with, the church functions. We are requesting the applicant to provide a plan to provide remedial measures to address current and future traffic control for pedestrian activities on 32nd Avenue. The pedestrian crossing was and will continue to be a major activity on 32nd Avenue. We have requested the applicant to provide the short and long range detail plans to provide a standard traffic control in assisting the crossing pedestrians. The City of Wheat Ridge feels the pedestrian activity by the church is significant, and that it is therefore important to convert to a standard type of traffic control which conforms to driver expectation regarding pedestrians. This is of vital concern to the City due to this activity is taking place within the City Right-of-Way, which could open up certain liability to the City. The City of Wheat Ridge conducted a joint field observation on 11/03/04 where pedestrian crossing activity took place at night. It revealed that the lighting condition at the crosswalk is inadequate to maintain sufficient 12/8/2006 Page 2 of 2 visibility between vehicular traffic, pedestrians and the uniform traffic controller. In the event that a midblock traffic signal is selected as the traffic control on 32nd Avenue through this expansion, the City of Whet Ridge plan to work with the Applewood Baptist Church to design and build the signal in front of the Church where the current marked crosswalk is at. My question to you would be that would the City of Lakewood will to maintenance signal? This question based on 2 things 1.) Is that Lakewood owns most of 32nd Avenue. The boundary line is about 5 feet south of the north curb line 2.) Logistically, the proposed midblock signal will be about one or two blocks away from an existing one owns and maintains by Lakewood on 32nd Avenue between Quail and Pierson. By location, this location is still within the Lakewood maintenance range of its own existing traffic controls. Since the two Cities share the common boundary on 32nd Avenue, we have had similar arrangement (but in the reverse order) before with the signal at 32nd and Union where Wheat Ridge accepted the maintenance since it was built. Please let me know what your thoughts are on this at your earliest convenience. Call or e-mail me if you want o discuss further. Thanks N. Nguven. P.E. Engineering Fax: 12/8/2006 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 303/235-2846 Fax: 3031235-2857 The City of Wheat Ridge November 27, 2006 Dear Property Owner: This is to inform you of Case No. SUP-06-04, a request for approval of a Special Use Permit to allow expansion of an educational facility as ancillary to a church on R-1 zoned property located at 11225 W. 32nd Avenue. This case will be heard by the Wheat Ridge City Council in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue. The meeting will be held on December 11, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at 303-235-2846. Thank you. Planning Division. % i-eug-001\mmWfield\K by\CC"TS\PU NOTIC\2006~up06O4."d OW21 N\ Z- R t RI "1 t -1 I zl I ti ems t be,o I a i - - g S 8 L01115E ,MSo & m~ PARK RK a,so R-C „M ~ ~ a ^ N 3IW w ,r' 3 R-3 m% R-3 m~ a w „ 3M' x N HARD] If s~ a SUB WW1 AW m CO • • N 4q a m ~ m R ' E .il. l o r, J 2 i g Av R-1A R-1 • J m N l PR PECT N s ~R W V LEY 1- E EM w N 5 OOL ° • rD ~ o m s e J a R-1 = VJ O l Z 733R DAVE V W m E N P D 8 Y / m N W Z Q O >3 lL 2 _ R " J LL j m O Q IJJ~ m !L o "i s p ,a r / o m 5 F M D p p / Q Q 3G Q J ~ s m ~ ~ O O N Q s T m m R A CITY LIMITS OW28 OFFICIAL PARCEULOT BOUNDARY ZONING MAP (DESIGNATES OWNERSHIP) WHEAT RIDGE COLORADO NW 28 WATER FEATURE * DENOTES MULTIPLE ADDRESSES 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN (APPROXIMATE LOCATION) 0 100 ZOO *00 400 Fe~ Z DEPARTMENT OF MAP ADOPTED: June 15, 1994 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Last Revision: September 10, 2001 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owneerr :Applewood Baptist Church Parcel :022669 Site :11200 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 xfered -11/24/1961 Mail :11200 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 7006 0100 0002 8317 2021 Use :9159 Exempt,Church,Land Bedrm: Bath: TOtRm:1 YB:1960 Pool: B1dgSF:26,108 Ac:2.80 - MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner Owner :Larkin Michael W/Barbra E Parcel :048245 Site :3187 Robb Cir Denver 80215 Xfered :07/28/1995 Mail :3187 Robb Cir Denver co 80215 7006 0100 0002 8317 2038 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Fllun~ Bedrm:3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1964 Pool: B1dgSF:1,338 Ac:.27 * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Pritt Jeffrey Parcel :048269 Site :3197 Robb Cir Lakewood 80215 xfered :06/17/1994 Mail :3197 Robb Cir Lakewood Co 80215 7006 0100 0002 ^ Use :1112 Res,Improved Land 8317 2045 Bedrm:3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1962 Pool: B1dgSF:1,671 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Broccio Joseph S Parcel :048309 Site :3137 Robb Cir Lakewood 80215 v-°---A -n110611998 Mail :2895 Robb Cir Lakewood Cc 80215\hel~e 7006 0100 0002 8317 2052 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land \Y V P one Bedrm:3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1961 Pool: B1dgSF:1,821 Ac:.23 - - • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner Owner :Case Jason/Tracy Parcel :048322 Site :3159 Robb Cir Lakewood 80215 - •ns/27/2005 Mail 3159 Robb Cir Lakewood Co 80215 ` 7006 0100 ' 0002 8317 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land V' Phone 2069 Bedrm:3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1963 Pool: B1dgSF:1,685 Ac:.24 * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Jeppesen John C Parcel :048332 Site :3274 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 vf>,-,,j :04/26/2004 Mail :3274 Quail St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 7006 0100 0002 8317 2076 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land on Bedrm:3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1980 Pool: B1dgSF:1,923 Ac:.21 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Schleusner Joee Ann Parcel :048333 Site :3254 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfererl Mail :3254 Quail St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 7006 0100 0002 8317 2083 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Bedrm:4 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1975 Pool: B1dgSF:2,733 Ac:.21 * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Cress Paul Michael Parcel :048379 Site :3224 Quail St Wheat Ridge 60033 vc---A .,n/9t/7nnA Mail :3224 Quail St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 7006 0100 0002 8317'2090 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone - Bedrm:3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1977 Pool: B1dgSF:1,604 Ac:.20 ; MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner !Owner :Sugai Wilfred M;+ Parcel :048439 Site :11158 W 33rd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Mail :11158 W 33rd Ave Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 7006 0100 0002 8317 2106 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm:3 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1968 Pool: B1dgSF:1,748 Ac:.22 * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Applewood Knolls Swim & Tennis Club Inc Parcel :048448 Site :11520 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 xf.,-A - Mail :PO Box 1741 Wheat Ridge Cc 80034 7006 0100 0002 8317 2113 Use :2112 Com,Improved Land ne Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF: Ac: * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Baxter Glenneta M Life Estate Et Al Parcel :048459 Site :3084 Routt Cir Lakewood 80215 Mail :PO Box 1405 Dubois Wy 82" -`1 7006 0100 0002 8317 2120 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land,"' s\ Phone Bedrm:3 Bath:2.25 TotRm~o Y 961 Pool: / B1dgSF:1,458 Ac:.25 Information compi sourc eal Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to [Re y'or co leleness of information contained in this report. MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Lucas David M Parcel :048468 Site :3220 Routt St Wheat Ridge 80033 7006 0100 0002 8317 2137 Mail f :6231 Chase St Arvada Co 80003 ~ Use ~ :1112 Res,Improved Land Vl)j Phone Bedrm :3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1985 Pool: B1dgSF:2,607 Ac:.30 : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Perri Ralph J II Parcel :048540 Site :*no Site Address* °F---A ter" t, oo^ Mail :1090 Holland St Lakewood Co 80215 7006 0100 0002 8317 2144 Use :1111 Vacant,Residential Phone Bedrm : Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF: Ac:3.77 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Odom John A Jr Parcel :048837 Site :11440 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 XferPrl •nz/n~/~oo~ Mail :11490 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 7006 0100 0002 8317 2151 Use :4133 Agr,Mountain Meadow Bedrm :3 Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1899 Pool: B1dgSF:1,214 Ac:8.72 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Green Carol D Parcel 049188 Site :11254 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 -1 Mail :11254 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80033 7006 0100 0002 8317 2168 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone :303-420-4652 Bedrm :l Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1950 Pool: B1dgSF:2,151 Ac:1.88 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Turner Jerry B Parcel :049234 Site :11256 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 7006 0 Mail :11256 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 ],00 0002 8317 2175 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1964 Pool: B1dgSF:1,617 Ac:4.39 * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) - Owner :Bartoletti Properties Llp Parcel :066720 Site :11157 W 31st Ave Lakewood 80215 xf",,l -117/111/'111111 Mail :11157 w 31st Ave Lakewood Cc 80215 7006 0100 0002 8317 2182 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land one Bedrm: 4 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YBf 1969 Pool: B1dgSF:2,010 Ac:.28 * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) - Owner :Hock Linda J Parcel -nr<Rl. 2199 Site :3294 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 7006 0100 0002 8317 Mail :3294 Quail St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1968 Pool: B1dgSF:1,578 Ac:.20 * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Rohr Sylvester P Parcel :070666 Site :3298 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 v°---A Mail :3298 Quail St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 7006 0100 0002 8317 2205 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1972 Pool: B1dgSF:2,413 Ac:.21 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Patrick Rodney J Parcel :070814 Site :11435 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 7006 0100 0002 8317 2212 Mail :11435 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.50 TotRm: YB:1932 Pool: B1dgSF:1,285 Ac:1.09 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Astuno Rocco D Jr Trust The Parcel :071819 Site :3154 Routt St Lakewood 80215 7006 010 0 (1002 8317 2229 Mail :3154 Routt St Lakewood Co 80215 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1969 Pool:Yes B1dgSF:1,662 Ac:.27 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Scott Millicent A/George B D Parcel :071Raa Site _ :3184 Routt St Lakewood 802 7006 0100 0002 8317 2236 Mail Use :188 Chippewa Cir Henrietta 14 :1112 Res,Improved Land ;0 Phone Bedrm: , 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm:p YB: goo l,: B1dgSF:2,240 Ac:.28 A N ! / X JC/ 1 l Information compiled frol)1Q.~pur64 7tr'a1 Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the ace7trncy or completeness of information contained in this report. "*---I-------------------------• MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Mccartney Ronald D Parcel :074399 Site :11158 W 31st Ave Lakewood 80215 -^-/nc/iggq Mail :11158 w 31st Ave Lakewood co 80215 7006 0100 0002 8317 2243 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm :4 Bath:2.75 TotRm: YB:1969 Pool: B1dgSF:2,286 Ac:.26 * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Hansen Carl L Parcel :085997 Site :3054 Routt Cir Lakewood 80215 of°,-°A •ns/~n/i999 Mail :3054 Routt Cir Lakewood Co 80215 7006 0100 0002 8317 2250 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land one Bedrm: 4 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1961 Pool: B1dgSF:1,245 Ac:.27 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Ficco Louis J Parcel :136197 Site :11340 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :05/04/1989 Mail :3650 Vance St #1 Wheat Ridge Co 80033 7006 0100 0002 8317 Use :5112 Res,Apartment,Improved Land 2267 Bedrm: Bath: TotRm:3 YB:1979 Pool: B1dgSF:28,504 Ac:4.42 * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Otoole James P/Adele M Parcel :136382 Site :3495 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 7006 0100 0002 8317 2274 Mail :3495 Quail St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:3.00 TotRm: YB:1979 Pool: BldgSF:3,031 Ac: * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Bares Mark A Parcel :136383 Site :3455 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 -1 -nQ/~r/2002 Mail :3455 Quail St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 7006 0100 0002 8317 2281 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 6 Bath:3.75 TotRm: YB:1977 Pool: B1dgSF:3,009 Ac: * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Gibbard Arthur A Parcel :136384 Site :3415 Quail St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge 80033 0100 0002 8317 2298 Mail :3415 Quail St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 7006 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land one Bedrm: 4 Bath:3.25 TotRm: YB:1977 Pool: B1dgSF:2,490 Ac: * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Scezney Jerome F Parcel :136385 Site :3395 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 7006 0100 0002 8317 2304 Mail :3395 Quail St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 , Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:2.75 TotRm: YB:1976 Pool: B1dgSF:2,816 Ac: * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Hill Leila J Parcel :136386 Site :3345 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 V'-- - 0002 8317 231 Mail :3345 Quail St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 7006 0100 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land one Bedrm: 4 Bath:3.00 TotRm: YB:1976 Pool: Yes B1dgSF:3,034 Ac: * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Applewood ~Bapti at C ch Parcel :151122 Site :11225 W 32nd Av eat. Ridge 80033 Xfered :09/28/1993 Mail :11200 W 32nd Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :9159 Exemp ,Churc nd Phone Bedrm: Bat TOtRm:l YB:1984 Pool: B1dgSF:26,535 Ac:14.76 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Wright Ernest A Parcel :174511 Site :3240 Routt St Wheat Ridge 80033 of°Y°B :03/25/1994 Mail :3240 Routt St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 7006 0100 0002 8317 2328 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land one Bedrm: 4 Bath:3.00 TotRm: YB:1987 Pool: B1dgSF:2,264 Ac:.31 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Archer Dolores F S Parcel :174512 Site ys :3260 Routt St Wheat Ridge 80033: XFPYPA (l~ t~ <t0,~I11 Mail :3260 Routt St Wheat Ridge Co 84 3 7006 0100 0002 8317 2335 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land * Bedrm: 3 Bath:3.00 TOtRm: YB.'P$,4 0'01: B1dgSF:2,274 Ac:.36 Information compiled from various A9 ,,-YehfE hdions mdkeeloo representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Craven Anthony K Parcel :174513 Site Mail :3280 Routt St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge 80033 :3280 Routt St ( No Mail ) Wheat Rid e Cc 80033 •nl/24/1999 7006 31011 0113 g 2 8317 2342 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm :5 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1988 Pool: B1dgSF:2,369 Ac:.4 7 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Cellars Virginia B Parcel :174514 Site :3310 Routt St Wheat Ridge 80033 Mail :3310 Routt St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 7006 0100 0002 8317 2359 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm :3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1994 Pool: BidgSF:2,976 Ac:2. 34 * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Jefferson County School District R-1 Parcel :176990 Site :3400 Pierson St Wheat Ridge 80033 7006 0100 0002 8317 2366 Mail :1829 Denver West Dr Golden Cc 80401 Use :9139 Exempt,County,Land Phone :303-982-67 73 Bedrm: Bath: TotRm:l YB:1967 Pool: B1dgSF:45,361 Ac:10 .56 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Barnhart Daniel E/Tiffany L •onn432 Site :3275 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 7006 0100 3332 8317 2373 Mail :3275 Quail St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price , Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1981 Pool: B1dgSF:2,774 Ac:2. 27 * - MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Swainson Shawn P/Cathy A InrAll Site :3204 Quail St Wheat Ridge .80033 7006 0100 0002 8317 2380 Mail :3204 Quail St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 rice Fu Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1964 Pool: B1dgSF:1,381 Ac:.2 5 * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Hartline Harbert A Parcel :200436 Site :11151 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 7036 0],30 3332 8317 2397 Mail :11151 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1963 Pool: B1dgSF:1,984 Ac:.26 * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Turner Louise Et Al Parcel :201143 Site :11100 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :12/16/2002 Mail :5393 Maggie Ln Evergreen Cc 80439 ~c 7036 0130 0002 8317 2403 Use :4141 Agr,Grazing Land v Bedrm: 2 Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1922 Pool: BidgSF:968 Ac:11 .98 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Klammer Peter F •~nignn Site :3200 Routt St Wheat Ridge 80033 7006 0100 0002 8317 2410 Mail :3200 Routt St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price , Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:3.00 TotRm: YB:1984 Pool: B1dgSF:3,190 Ac:.39 Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Applewood Baptist Church Michael & Barbra Larkin Jeffrey Pritt 11200 W 32nd Ave 3187 Robb Cir 3197 Robb Cir Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Denver, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Joseph Broccio Jason & Tracy Case John Jeppesen 2895 Robb Cir 3159 Robb Cir 3274 Quail St Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Joee Ann Schleusner & Jeff Schleusner Paul Michael Cress & Traci Denise Cress Wilfred Sugai 3254 Quail St 3224 Quail St 11158 W 33rd Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Applewood Knolls Swim & Tennis Club Inc Baxter Glenneta M Life Estate David Lucas PO Box 1741 Sam Baxter 111 6231 Chase St Wheat Ridge, CO 80034 PO Box 1405 Arvada, CO 80003 Dubois, WY 82513 Ralph Perri II & Deborah Perri John Odom Jr. & Lorrie Odom Carol Green 1090 Holland St 11490 W 38th Ave 11254 W 38th Ave Lakewood, CO 80215 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Jerry Turner & Louise Turner Bartoletti Properties Up Linda Hock 11256 W 38th Ave 11157 W 31st Ave 3294 Quail St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Lakewood, CO 80215 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Sylvester Rolu & Mary Rohr Rodney Patrick & Jeanette Patrick Rocco The Astuno Jr. 3298 Quail St 11435 W 32nd Ave Rocco Violet Astuno Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 3154 Routt St Lakewood, CO 80215 Millicent Scott & B D George Ronald Mccartney & Constance Mccartney Carl Hansen & Betty Hansen 188 Chippewa Cir 11158 W 31st Ave 3054 Routt Cir Henrietta, NY 14467 Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Louis Ficco & Anthony Ficco James & Adele Otoole Mark Sates & Amy Sates 3650 Vance St #1 3495 Quail St 3455 Quail St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Jerome Scezney & Jacqueline Hunt Leila Hill & Mc Arthur Hill Applewood Baptist Church 3395 Quail St 3345 Quail St 11200 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Ernest Wright & Patricia Wright Dolores Archer Virginia Cellars & Robert Cellars 3240 Routt St 3260 Routt St 3310 Routt St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Jefferson County School District R-1 1829 Denver West Dr Golden, CO 80401 Daniel & Tiffany Barnhart Tiffany Barnhart 3275 Quail St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Shawn & Cathy Swainson 3204 Quail St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Harbert Hartline & Ruth Hartline Louise Turner & D Edwards Loren Peter Klammer & Cynthia Klammer 11151 W 32nd Ave 5393 Maggie Ln 3200 Routt St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Evergreen, CO 80439 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 * Search Parameters * Jefferson (CO) * 11/27/2006 * 8:54 AM Parcel Number ...41 39 282 04 049 39 282 05 023 39 282 05 030 39 282 05 031 39 282 05 034 39 282 05 054 39 282 05 055 39 282 05 056 39 282 05 057 39 282 05 058 39 282 05 059 39 282 05 061 39 282 05 064 39 282 05 065 39 282 05 066 39 282 05 067 39 282 05 068 39 282 05 069 39 282 05 078 39 282 06 003 39 282 06 004 39 282 06 005 39 282 06 006 39 282 06 007 39 282 06 008 39 282 06 016 39 282 06 017 39 282 07 001 39 282 05 087 39 283 02 011 39 283 02 023 39 283 03 001 39 283 05 001 39 283 05 002 39 283 05 003 39 283 05 004 39 283 05 029 39 283 05 030 39 283 05 031 39 283 05 032 39 283 06 003 ATTENTION APPLEWOOD NEIGHBORS Please be advised that the Applewood Baptist Church has applied for a "Special Use Permit" to build another building on the north side of W. 32nd Ave. to be connected to their already existing building. The new building will be much iarger than the existing building with a connector building between the two buildings. This will cause more traffic, congestion, noise, air pollution, etc. to an already congested complex. This will be a commercial type complex in a residential neighborhood. The current size of the existing three-story building on the north side of W.32 "d Ave. is approx. 24,815 sq. ft.* The proposed new additional three story building will be approx. 35,685 sq. ft.* with additional parking. (*Per the Applewood Baptist Church plan of 10-10-06). This would result in buildings totaling approx. 60,500 sq.ft. on the north side of W. 32"d Avenue. ****SEE ATTACHED SITE PLAN**** If you would like more detailed information please contact the City of Wheat planning department: Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner City of Wheat Ridge Planning Division 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Direct Number:, 303-25-1848 Fax: 303-235-2857 E-Mail: mreckertd)ci.wheatddne.c6.us Case h#umber: SUP-06-04 IF YOU ARE OPPOSED TO THIS TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT IN YOUR APPLEWOOD NEIGHBORHOOD, IT IS IMPERITIVE THAT YOU MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD IN WRITING AND IN PERSON AT THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING WHERE TH DECISION WILL BE MADE THAT NIGHT. ****Please inform your neighbors**** Make sure your voice is heard on this important matter that will affect your neighborhood forever. A decision will be made at the City Council meeting Date: Cbl*%ity Council Meeting ity Cle cityTreas: cii .R Ober 11 , 2086 at 7:00 P DeptHeadS: City of Wheat Badge 500" West 29t~ venue t Ridge, :;Colorado 80033 7500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 303/235-2846 Pax: 303/235-2857 eat Ridge November 27, 2006 Dear Property Owner: This is to inform you of Case No. SUP-06-04, a request for approval of a Special Use Permit to allow expansion of an educational facility as ancillary to a church on R-1 zoned x ? property located at 11225 W. 32"d Avenue. This case will be heard by the Wheat Ridge City Council in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue. The meeting will be held on December 11, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at 303-235-2846. Thank you. Planning Division. Usmci-eng401W m*GdQ~hyICCRPTSWMNOTIM006kupO604.wpd cv ~1yC Z G y=.~MC Si a m~ ~v b'C co m n R z r. D 0o 0 A ~ r t~ O O .x d x co a D `-7 w f _ n +J A TN _ R r\ n G a November 8, 2006 Meredith Reckert, AICP Senior Planner City of Wheat Ridge 7500 West 29t' Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 0 9:YJ a RE: Case No. SUP-06-04 (Applewood Baptist Church) Dear Meredith, As you know, we are the property owners adjacent to the west border of the Applewood Baptist Church. After reviewing their plans and the proposed development of another educational facility, we are extremely opposed to this type of massive commercial type development in a residential neighborhood. This is a quiet residential neighborhood, with the exception of the congestion and traffic, both automotive and pedestrian, on 32nd Ave. from the church buildings (on the south side of W.32nd. Ave) to the existing large educational building (approximately 16,000 sq.ft.) on the north side of W 32nd Ave. This congestion is made worse by the parking on side streets instead of in the church's existing parking lots. The increased traffic will have a negative affect on neighborhood safety and the people living in the neighborhood going about their normal daily lives. We are opposed to this massive addition because of the increased traffic on West 32nd Ave. and the surrounding streets, as well as the increased air and noise pollution it will bring to the Applewood area. I would assume that the new 308 space parking lot to the north will have exterior lighting as well as the proposed approximately 39,000 sq. ft three story building and connector. How will that affect the adjacent property owners? We also have a real concern about raising the elevation and drainage and how it would affect the surrounding properties. What about the elevation of the building? Are they planning on bringing in additional fill to raise the elevation? If so, this would raise the height of the building. Drainage is also a major concern for the adjacent properties. How do you buffer a massive commercial size development such as this to protect the adjacent property owners and the neighborhood from an existing three story 16,000 sq. ft. building and a proposed additional approximately 39,000 sq. ft. three story building, including the connector between the two buildings. This size of development, whether it be an addition as proposed, or if it's a commercial, office, retail or industrial complex, does not belong in the middle of a residential neighborhood. The Applewood Baptist Complex would consist of a existing 223479 sq. ft. building, with approximately 132 parking spaces on the south side of W.32nd Ave., the existing 16,000 sq. ft. education building with approximately 160+ parking spaces on the north side of W.32 °d Ave., plus a new 39,000 +1- sq. ft. three story building with a connector building and an additional 308 parking spaces. The complex would consist of approximately 77,479 sq. ft. of buildings and approximately 600 + parking spaces. This is a massive complex that does not belong in the middle of a residential neighborhood. I urge you not to approve this special use permit. Sincerely, CrLcx-l~ Ral h . erri, II and Deborah A. Perri Adjacent Property Owners -S'-4- 11/07/06 Dear Honorable members of City Council and planning committee members, As the new property owners of 3275 Quail, we are opposed to the approval of a special use permit allowing the creation of an additional wing for the Applewood Baptist Church and accompanying traffic way and parking lot. As expecting new parents and concerned citizens living close to the grade school, we are extremely concerned that the new addition, and related traffic and planned traffic ways, will create a dangerous increase in traffic and noise that our neighborhood simply cannot support. In addition, the site plan presented, if approved, would have an enormous impact on our property creating a thoroughfare, additional parking, a large building structure and trash bin next to our two-acre property. The effect would create traffic around three sides of our property, greatly affecting the residential nature of our lot and surrounding residences and contributing dangerous and loud traffic conditions. The current impact of church activities has already negatively affected traffic in our neighborhood and additional growth would only compound this problem. Currently the church has to employ traffic measures and people to manage traffic in and out of their lots on 32nd street on weekends and weekdays. This greatly impedes the flow of traffic (regardless of what church Traffic Impact Studies report) and causes excessive noise and potentially dangerous traffic conditions for children and cyclists that are a constant in this neighborhood. Cones are placed across 32°d Ave. to slow motorists down and protect pedestrians crossing the street. This slowing, caused by church attendees trying to get into the parking lot as well as pedestrians, causes regular back ups in traffic and motorists rubbernecking up and down 32nd Ave. Impatient drivers often speed excessively once past the cones, trying to make up for lost time, speeding by our home and those of our neighbors. We feel that the proposed plan would only compound these already troublesome situations. From the plans it appears that this special use request also would put a sizable 25' wide street right on die edge of our property bringing more of that traffic and noise along the entire West side of our property, transferring that noise to neighbors to the East and North of us. If the proposal of streets sandwiching our property on 3 sides isn't bad enough, we have also learned, from the developers wanting to construct several houses to the Northwest of us, that a street would go in on the property line to the North of us effectively putting. streets on all four sides of our property. It also appears that the church's plans propose a bus parking lot and an 8' trash bin directly on the edge of our property. When we bought the property with plans to raise our family in Wheat Ridge, we never imagined that our parcel would be sandwiched by strwts on 4 sides with views of parking lots and garbage bins. The construction of a thoroughfare behind our parcel would create a much different atmosphere than city planners had intended for a residential neighborhood. Please consider the effect it would have cn your home if your property were to be surrounded by streets on all sides and thus separating it from the rest a-d Xdd 13rN3SH-I dH WdLib:S 100a ST daS of the neighborhood. We just purchased this property as ow ideal home to raise our family, but beyond that we truly f!cl this special use plan would be blight on the neighborhood and impact others in our area negatively. We are truly confused as to why a 3 story, 37,000 sq ft bldg on top of an already oversized building is necessary to a residential oommunity. On another note, we have some serious concerns regarding drainage as the area in question already has pretty major drainage issues which could be greatly exacerbated by a large parking lot and more buildings. The proposed additional traffic flow and parking will not only create an unsafe environment for our family and neighbors, it will also create a noise polluted atmosphere in an otherwise quiet neighborhood. The planned bus parking makes us cringe at the thought of the sound of these large polluting vehicles parking just feet from our home. We feel that any planning should meet the needs of those that have made their homes here, not those that attend large communal events this neighborhood was not designed or intended to support. Please fell free to call or email us if you have any questions whatsoever. Thanks for listening and considering us and our neighbor's perspectives! Sincerely, Dan & Tiffany Barnhart 720.987-5716 dmb@lnbambart.com 303-596-7557 tbambart na denverzoo.org aV,,- T4 6'd XH3 13r83SHI dH WHLb:S T00a ST daS POSTING CERTIFICATION CASE NO. Su P - 06-Q~ DEADLINE FOR WRITTEN COMMENTS: C /8 IOro I, residing at as the applicant for Case No. .06-0 , hereby certify that I have posted the sign for Public Notice at (location) on this 210 day of 4tb 61" , 2000' , and do hereby certify that said sign has been posted and remained in place for ten (10) days prior to and including the deadline for written comments regarding this case. The sign was posted in the position shown on the map below. Signature: NOTE: This form must be submitted to the Community Develop rr/ent Department for this case and will be placed in the applicant's case file. JJ 'R R-1A z FT WE LL x V LE N E EM 5 00 5 B ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ Q g O W33R DAVE _ gg ~ gg _1 m E F Y R O (n . W w a c m . LU p F m Wx ; = O iL u Q m ° a -1 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 3031235-2846 Fax: 303/235-2857 The City of Wheat Ridge October 30, 2006 This is to inform you of Case No. SUP-06-04, a request for administrative approval of a Special Use Permit for the Applewood Baptist Church to allow expansion of an educational facility on R-1 zoned property located at 11225 W. 32nd Ave. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 1291, an administrative special use review can be granted by the Community Development Director without need for a public hearing. Prior to the rendering of a decision, all adjacent property owners are required to be notified of the request by certified mail. If you have any questions, please contact the Planning Division at 303-235-2846 or if you would like to submit comments concerning this request, please do so in writing by 5:00 p.m. on November 8, 2006. Thank you. eAplanningWor Vapubnot.wpd OW21 L- 0 - L FI w,o r g LOUISE TURNER _ K PARM " ayyp m H R-C 31. ~ W ai ~ ~ 3 p N 3i~ e 3 R-3 L i Q .Oo ;o. - f a N z HARDI atss xi, ams yw. . j_,4. _r 6 _ a CIS ' a ^ f SUBR CO .YF ' W36TNAVE . .ate CS1 _ T T ~ 1 . m LL, 6 u$ W 35 V PL i • i ~ 4 i ~ ~ 6 R-1A R-1 LL t PR PECT i L 5 in L V LEY RPR w E EM 0 5 OOL o a a 5 F e _:3 J O a R-1 W > S Li V) S .l p ^ 'n a wY FVE Z M W33R D AVE W t Y ill. m Z n ~ a N ~ N n s Q _ z E w w W x Q n 0 LN- p ,o S IN- O O N W ~ p 0 x a _ 0 R. A a m m $ 5W 28 OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WHEAT RIDGE COLORADO PARCEULOTBOUNDARY (DESIGNATES OWNERSHIP) WATER FEATURE * DENOTES MULTIPLE ADDRESSES 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN (APPROXIMATE LOCATION) NW 28 0 00 ® 400 Fen. n Z ~w0.uo . ? 6 L DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT MAP ADOPTED: June 15, 1, 2 Last Revision September 100 2001 1 f /nom ~n / 7'/"11-~'G~Y\1 l / Jefferson (CO) * , " - - • MetroScaa / Owner :1112200 :Applewooaptist Wheat Church 5 Ridge 80033 Xfered :11/669 Site Mail :11200 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 n-7pp6 p1pp ❑p02 8317 Use :9159 Exempt,Church,Land Bedrm: Bath: TotRm:l YB:1960 Pool: B1dgSF:26, 108 Ac :(2.S•., * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) G c Owner :Perri Ralph J II Parcel :0485, GO Site :*no Site Address* xfered :12/31/1984 Mail :1090 Holland St Lakewood Cc 80215 7006 0100 0002 8317'148-2---' Use :1111 Vacant,Residential Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF: Ac:3.77 * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Odom John A Jr Parcel :048837 Site :11440 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :03/02/999? Mail :11490 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80033 7006 011111 0002 8317 1499 Use :4133 Agr,Mountain Meadow Bedrm:3 Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1899 Pool: B1dgSF:1,214 Ac:8.72 * ---------------------------MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Green Carol D Parcel :049188 Site :11254 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :09/07/0n^` Mail :11254 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80033 7006 11100 0002 8317 1505 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land - -4652 Bedrm:l Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1950 Pool: B1dgSF:2,151 Ac:1.88 * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Turner Jerry B Parcel :049234 Site :11256 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 t7006 0100 0002 8317 1512 Mail :11256 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm:4 Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1964 Pool: B1dgSF:1,617 Ac:4.39 * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) . Owner :Ficco Louis J II Parcel :136197 Site :11340 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Mail :3650 Vance St #1 wheat Ridge co 80 7006 0100 0002 8317 1529 Use :5112 Res,Apartment,Improved Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm:3 B:1979 Pool: B1dgSF:28,504 Ac:4.42 * MetroScan / Jeffers (CO) . Owner :Otoole James P/Adele M Parcel :136382 Site :3495 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 YF---A - Mail :3495 Quail St Wheat Ridge Cc 800 7006 11100 0002 8317 1536 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land one Bedrm:4 Bath:3.00 TotRm: YB:1979 Pool: B1dgSF:3,031 Ac: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner Owner :Sares Mark A Parcel :1363831. Site :3455 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Mail :3455 Quail St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 7006 0100 0002 8317 1543 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land one Bedrm:6 Bath:3.75 TotRm: YB:1977 Pool: B1dgSF:3,009 Ac: * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) owner Owner :Gibbard Arthur A Parcel :136384 Site :3415 Quail St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge 80033 7006 11100 0002 83]7 15511 Mail :3415 Quail St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge Cc 80C Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm:4 Bath:3.25 TotRm: YB:1977 Pool: B1dgSF:2,490 Ac: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Scezney Jerome F Parcel :136385 Site :3395 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 _ Xfered :04/04/1997 Mail :3395 Quail St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 7006 0100 0002 8317 1567 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land, Bedrm:4 Bath:2.75 TotRm: B:1976 Pool: B1dgSF:2,816 Ac: * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) owner :Hill Leila J Parcel :136386 Site :3345 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 xf°,-va Mail :3345 Quail St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 70116 0100 0002, 8317 1574 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land one Bedrm:4 Bath:3.00 TotRm: YB:1976 Pool:Yes B1dgSF:3,034 Ac: Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. • : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) :Applewood Baptist C urch Parcel :151122 Owner Site :11225 W 32nd Av eat Ridge 80033 Xfered :09/28/1993 1111 ~T Mail :11200 W 32n ve Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price iC, Use :9159 Exe ,Church,Land Phone C, Bedrm: the TotRm:l YB:1984 Pool: B1dgSF:26,535 Ac`.76c~6 * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) -------*,:5 Owner :Barnhart Daniel E/Tiffany L Parcel :200432 Site :3275 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 7006 0100 0002 8317 1581 Mail :3275 Quail St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm:4 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1981 Pool: B1dgSF:2,774 Ac:2.27 * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Turner Louise Et Al Parcel :201143 Site :11100 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge 60033 Xfered Mail :5393 Maggie Ln Evergreen Cc 80439 7006 0100 0002 8317 1598 Use :4141 Agr,Grazing Land Bedrm:2 Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1922 Pool: B1dgSF:968 Ac:11.98 Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Applewood Baptist Church Ralph Perri II & Deborah Perri John Odom Jr. & Lome Odom 11200 W 32nd Ave 1090 Holland St 11490 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Lakewood, CO 80215 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Carol Green 11254 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Jerry Turner & Louise Turner 11256 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Louis Ficco & Anthony Ficco 3650 Vance St #1 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 James & Adele Otoole 3495 Quail St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Leila Hill & Mc Arthur Hill 3345 Quail St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Louise Turner & D Edwards Loren 5393 Maggie Ln Evergreen, CO 80439 Mark Sares & Amy Sares 3455 Quail St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Applewood Baptist Church 11200 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Jerome Scezney & Jacqueline Hunt 3395 Quail St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Daniel & Tiffany Barnhart Tiffany Barnhart 3275 Quail St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 CITY OF LAKEWOOD Traffic Engineering Division 480 South Allison Parkway Lakewood, CO 80226 303-987-7980 Fax 303-987-9452 October 16, 2006 Meredith Reckert Wheat Ridge Department of Planning and Development 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Dear Meredith: The City of Lakewood, Traffic Engineering Division has reviewed the Traffic Impact Analysis for Applewood Baptist Church dated August 27, 2006 and found it to be a good representation of the projected traffic from this development. The proposed development has shown staggered accesses by 150' to allow for an overlap of left turning movements. The church is providing a shuttle service to minimize the parking in the neighborhood and requesting that the congregation not park on street rather use the parking lots provided. Although the City would like to see the access on Robb Circle closed to further mitigate neighborhood traffic. The lot is rather small and does not generate a lot of trips with the additional access on to 32nd Avenue. The Traffic Impact Analysis shall be accepted and approved. If you have any questions feel free to contact me at 303.987.7986. Sincere, John Padon Principal Traffic Engineer c. Steve Nguyen, City of Wheat Ridge, Traffic Engineering Becky Clark Tina Dill Cheryl Wise 154 Padon DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (303) 235-2861 Gty of Wheat Rldge \ Depai-tr nt of public works 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 FAX (303) 235- 2857 October 16, 2006 Mr. Gary D. Theander, P.E. Mountain States Engineering, Inc. 12860 W. Cedar Drive, Suite 102 Lakewood, CO 80228 Re: - Third Review Comments of Special Use Permit Site Plan and Final Plat received on October 12, 2006. Dear Mr. Theander, I have completed the review of the above referenced documents for the Applewood Baptist Church Expansion Project located at 11225 W. 32"d Avenue, and have the following comments: Surveying Comments 1. All previous comments have been addressed for both the SUP Site Plan and the Final Plat. 2. The Final Plat is hereby approved for Mylar®. Please include Doug Berling's seal and signature on the Mylar® prior to submission. The above comments are as of the date reviewed and may not reflect all comments from other departments or reviewing agencies. If you have any questions, please contact me at 303.235.2864. Sincerely, David F. Brossman, P.L.S. Development Review Engineer CC: Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner Steve Nguyen, Engineering Manager File Applewood Baptist Eapansion2006_SUP & Plat - approvalAndoc D City partment of PubHe Works MEMORANDUM TO: Dave Brossman, Development Review Engineer Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner FROM: Steve Nguyen, Engineering Manager CC: Tim Paranto, Director of Public Works Alan White, Director of Planning and Development DATE: Friday, September 22, 2006 SUBJECT: Applewood Baptist Church, 11200 W. 32nd Avenue, Traffic Impact Review 95 Upon further engineering evaluation and a follow up discussion with the Development Team, Public Works will not require the westbound right turn lane on 32 d Avenue as stated in the earlier memos. The additional info submitted by the applicant reveals that the turning volume in question is marginal and that this movement will not occur on a daily basis. The Public Works Department is still concerned with the pedestrian activity associated with the church functions. We are requesting that the applicant provide an action plan or provide remedial measures to address current and future traffic control for pedestrian activities on 32 d Avenue. The pedestrian crossing is a major activity on 32nd Avenue, and the recent submittal has provided some additional discussion on this. However, please expand the discussion on short and long range detail plans to provide a standard traffic control in assisting the crossing pedestrians. The City feels the pedestrian activity by the church is significant, and that it is therefore important to convert to a standard type of traffic control which conforms to driver expectation regarding pedestrians. This is of vital concern to the City due to this activity is taking place within the City Right-of-Way, which could open up certain liability to the City. The fundamental question that needs to be addressed is would this pedestrian activity warrant a pedestrian signal in the near term or for build out condition as outlined in the MUTCD. In the event that a signal is not warranted, other considerations or design options which would protect pedestrians and effectively regulate safe speed at the crossing point under both day and night time conditions need to be explored. The City conducted an observation on 11/03/04 where pedestrian crossing activity took place at night. It revealed that the lighting condition at the crosswalk is inadequate to maintain sufficient visibility between vehicular traffic, pedestrians and the uniform traffic controller. Please let me know if you wish to discuss the details. 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 303/235-2846 Fax: 303/235-2857 September 21, 2006 Gary Theander Mountain States Engineering 2130 Kipling Street Lakewood, CO 80215 Dear Mr. Theander: The City of Wheat Ridge ~F WHEgT ~ P 0 U~ m C~<ORP00 This letter is in regard to your submittal for approval of a two-lot subdivision at 11225 W. 32" a Avenue (Applewood Baptist Church). SHEET ONE The development review team has finally come to a decision that a deceleration along W. 32nd Avenue will not be required; therefore no additional right-of-way will need to be dedicated by this plat document. This is contrary to what was indicated in a previous comment letter provided to you and Stan Pouw. Because no right-of-way dedication is required, only one public hearing will be required in front of Planning Commission. City Council review will not be required. Many of the following comments relate to the revised public hearing requirements and the required certification blocks. 1.. Modify the dedicatory language so it meets the requirements for a plat without dedication. 2. Modify the Planning Commission signature block so it meets the requirements for a plat without dedication. 3. Modify the City Certification (Mayor's certificate) so it meets the requirements for a plat without dedication. 4. Modify Note #2 to specify the correct flood zone designation for the southern lot as Zone X (unshaded). 5. Add the City's standard language for detention easements (see attached). SHEET TWO To meet the standards of the Wheat Ridge fire protection district, increase the width of the access easement from 20'to 25'. City of Wheat Ridge Department of Public September 20, 2006 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (303) 235-2861 7500 WEST 29T" AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 FAX (303) 235-2857 Mr. Gary D. Theander, P.E. Mountain States Engineering, hic. 12860 W. Cedar Drive, Suite 102 Lakewood, CO 80228 Re: - Second Review Comments of Preliminary Drainage Report/Plan, and Final Plat received on September 6, 2006. Dear Mr. Theander, I have completed the second review of the above referenced documents for the Applewood Baptist Church Expansion Project located at 11225 W. 32nd Avenue, and have the following comments: Drainage Preliminary Drainage Report 1. The previous comments have been adequately addressed for the Preliminary Drainage Report. 2. All specific technical review comments will be made at the time of submittal of the Final Drainage Report. Preliminary Drainage 1. The previous comments have been adequately addressed. 2. All specific technical review comments will be made at the time of submittal of the Final Drainage Report. Preliminary Drainage Plan 1. The previous comments have been adequately addressed. 2. All specific technical review comments will be made at the time of submittal of the Final Drainage Plan. Surveying Final Plat Prior to the creation of the Mylar®, please include a statement on Sheet 2 including arrows pointing to the lines for the old Tracts (SEE Sheet 2 of the Plat): "LOT LINES HEREBY REMOVED BY THIS PLAT." This will consolidate the 3 existing Tracts and subdivide the resultant parcel into 2 lots, which appears to be the intent. Preliminary Site Plan 1. No Special Use Permit Site Plan was include with this submittal. Please include a Site Plan with the next submittal. Applewood Baptist Expamion2006_ PDR & Plat- review2.ltr.doc Traffic Engineering 1. No Traffic Impact Study was included with this submittal. The Public Works Department requires two signed and stamped copies of the Final Plat, Final Drainage Report/Plan, and SUP Site Plan. Please provide these documents along with a CD or DVD-ROM containing the Final Plat in AutoCAD.dwg format with the final document submittal. Submittals will not be considered as being under review until all of the above-mentioned documents & electronic media have been received by the City. Right-of-Way Construction Permit(s)/Licensing Prior to any construction within the public right-of-way, the necessary Right-of-Way Construction Permit(s) and respective licensing will need to be submitted for processing by the City. Right-of-Way Construction Permits are issued only after approval of all required technical documents, including but not limited to, the Final Drainage Report & Plan, Final Plat, Final Development Plan, Traffic Impact Study, Storm Sewer Plans, Street Construction Plans, Grading & Erosion Control Plan, Traffic Control Plan, and easement or ROW dedications. 2-Year Warranty Period for Public Improvements The Contractor shall warrant all work performed within the public right-of-way for a period of two (2) years, commencing upon completion of all constructed public improvements and Final Acceptance by the City Inspector. Prior to the expiration of said 2-year Warranty Period, if the City Inspector deems that the constructed public improvements are in such condition as to require repairs or replacement, the Contractor shall complete such repair work upon request per the City of Wheat Ridge Permit Testing and Inspection Requirements. NPDES Permit The Federal Clean Water Act implemented by the EPA requires that stormwater discharges from certain types of facilities as part National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) be authorized under stormwater discharge permits. Construction sites greater than one (1) acre in size require an NPDES permit. The area of the proposed subdivision is greater than one acre and therefore shall comply with NPDES regulations. The NPDES permit for construction activities is issued by the State through the Colorado Discharge Permit System (CDPS), and may be obtained by contacting the Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment, Water Quality Control Division. A copy of the CDPS Permit is to be submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to issuance of the Major Grading/Landfill and Building Permits. Application for Minor Dumping/Landfill Permit prior to the commencement of any onsite grading, an Application for Dumping/Landfill Permit, along with the fees due will need to be submitted for review and approval. This Permit is generally issued at the time of the Building Permit. Right-of-Way Construction Permit(s)/Licensing prior to any construction of public improvements, utility service connections, etc. lying within the public right-of- way, the necessary Right-of-Way Construction Permit(s) and respective licensing will need to be submitted for processing by the City. Right-of-Way Construction Permits are issued only after approval of all required technical documents, including but not limited to, the Final Drainage Report & Plan, Final Plat, Final Development Plan, Traffic Impact Study, Storm Sewer Plans, Street Construction Plans, Grading & Erosion Control Plan, and any easement or ROW dedications. Applewood Baptist Expamion2006_ PDR & Plat - nviewIltr.doc Drainage Certification Required Prior to C.O. Upon completion of the drainage improvements, the Engineer-of-Record Mr. Scott Paling, P.E., shall provide to the City of Wheat Ridge a written, signed and sealed Drainage Certification Letter stating that the site grading was completed per the approved Grading & Erosion Control and Drainage Plans, all drainage facilities were constructed and shall function as defined in the approved Final Drainage Report/Plan, and that the site has been accurately surveyed to confirm that the grading and the construction of all drainage facilities was completed in accordance with these documents. The Drainage Certification Letter shall be submitted to the City for review and approval, and shall be accompanied with As-Built Plans for all constructed drainage facilities prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy. The As-Built Plans shall be submitted as follows: Two (2) copies of the "As-Built" Plans are to be submitted: a. 1 copy is to be on bond paper, and b. 1 copy is to be on electronic media (CD-ROM) and is to be in AutoCAD.dwg format. Please return all redlined plans with the next submittal. If you have any questions, please contact me at 303.235.2864. Sincerely, O David F. Brossman, P.L.S. Development Review Engineer CC: Steve Nguyen, Engineering Manager Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner File Applewood Bapdst Expamion2006_ PDR & Plat- reviewllt.doc BELFRY ENGINEERING Mechanical Et Electrical Consulting Engineers * 2811 West 9m Ave. TEL: (303) 892-5980 Denver, CO 80204 FAX: (303) 892-5979 email: belfay@belfay.com September 15, 2006 Meredith Reckert City of Wheat Ridge 7500 W. 29`h Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 PROJECT#: 06061 PROJECT NAME: Applewood Baptist Church Per our photometric calculations there is no light trespass at the property lines. The plans show minimal lighting 5 feet before the property lines. Sincerely, John C. Kirkman, PE THE CITY OF LAKEWOOD COMMUNITY PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT 480 SOUTH ALLISON PARKWAY LAKEWOOD, COLORADO 80226-3105 PHONE: 303 / 987-7982 / VOICE 303/987-7580/TOO FAx: 303 / 987-7979 September 13, 2006 Meredith Reckert Wheat Ridge Department of Planning & Development 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 RE: Lakewood Case # OR-06-011 Wheat Ridge Case # SUP-06-04 and MS-06-04 Applewood Baptist Church 11225 W. 32nd Avenue Dear Ms. Reckert, Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposal to expand the existing church building located at 11225 W. 32nd Avenue. The comments regarding the Special Use Permit proposal is linked to the potential subdivision of the land. The City of Lakewood staff offers the following comments for your consideration: 1. Detention should be provided on each lot. Detention ponds should not be allowed in the floodplain. 2. Create a Cross Access Easement for detention maintenance between the two proposed lots if only one detention pond is created. 3. Access to right-of-way should be required for the proposed northern parcel. 4. Please ask the applicant to show opposing and adjacent access points on future submittals. This includes all site plans, rezoning applications, traffic studies, etc. Staff would appreciate being notified on future development proposals for the property. If you have questions or concerns regarding these comments please contact me at 303-987-7527 or by e-mail at tindil@lakewood.org. Sincerely,- Tina Dill Project Manager cc: Olga Mikhailova, Ben Mehmen, Shawn deJong, Case File OR-06-011, OR-06-013 and File154-Dill 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 3031235-2846 Fax: 303/235-2857 September 12, 2006 Stanley Pouw Pouw & Associates 190 East 9d' Avenue Suite 250 Denver, CO 80203 Dear Mr. Pouw: The City of Wheat Ridge This letter is in regard to your application for approval of a Special Use Permit to allow expansion of a church at 11225 W. 32nd Avenue in an R-1 zone district. I have reviewed the revised special use permit site plan document and have the following comments. COVERPAGE 4 1. The legal description should reflect the portion of the lot to be developed with this proposal (i.e., Block 1, Lot 1). It should not include the 7 acres to the north. Do not include the dedicatory language from the plat document as this is not a subdivision. SITE PLAN 1. Show the access easement which runs from W. 32nd Avenue to the rear to provide access to the fixture development to the north. This easement must be a minimum of 25' in width. 2. The western property dimension of 608.80 does not match that.shown on the plat. However, I believe the error is on the plat document. Please verify. 3. The size of the property to the rear does not match that shown the plat. These figures should be consistent. LANDSCAPE PLAN 1. The four new street trees along W. 32nd Avenue must be 3" in caliper 2. In the landscape island to the west of the building, four emerald queen maples are indicated where only three are shown. PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 1. The footcandle readings are to be 0 at the property lines. Readings along the east property line exceed 0. Please make adjustments to fall within this standard. BUILDING HEIGHT CALCULATION PAGE I am unclear as to how you prepared your building height calculations and would like to sit down with you at your convenience to discuss them when you are back in town. This concludes the summary of comments. Please address each of these comments by revising the drawings accordingly. For clarification on any of these issues, please feel free to contact any of the Development Review committee members: Community Development Meredith Reckert 303-235-2848 Public Works Dave Brossman 303-235-2864 Traffic Engineering Steve Nguyen 303-235-2862 Comments regarding the subdivision plat and preliminary drainage report which were submitted separately will be forthcoming. If you have any questions or need further clarification, do not hesitate to contact me at 303-235- 2848. Sincerely, eredith Reckert, AICP Senior Planner rs '1 i a~ q~ ~~ucs I 9002 `8 ~sn~nd ~ , 4 sa.i.~i~ossd ~ rnnoa ~aa~s .za~o~ • ~ ope_io~o~ `a~pt~[ 1~agm H~`~~1H~ ZSI~I..d~S QO zlv~~~a ~sr~ ~~I~~as 'SM'd~( ~O 3a0~ ~~3Cliz! 1'd~Hly( ~O ~4~-9 SN0151/~O~d ~Hl ~11M 1N~151SN0~ ~1~ ~Ql~fb'H 1'v`1~W o ~~nlx i ~ ~o dol of r~ r ~Q'~Z4~ WO?~~ H91H . Z 3Q 1 ~1'~H ~'d13W ~ x i ~ ~o dol of ~a~~ wore +~~iH ,gi wnw~x~ ~l~~w~~ i n~~~ .j_ 'rs :z '"--iM j0 Ally s~~~ i~~ rL I 1 w  5Zlb'~ I SQ~~hI ~N I 5~1~d~ ~Z ~SOO~11 ~ dslbb'9 ~ ~31~~~ 5W00?.~ a ~Ni~~~~ ~+~~nH~ S2~'v`~ ~~bl ~5001/I ~ ~SSO~'t~! Z ~3~3~f N~H~ll~l ~J'd~ g-b ~SOO~/I ~ ~sbg~`~I 1131~~1 SWOO? 9N I Q"1 I t1~ NO 11`d ~(l S'~'d~ ~~3 ~SOO~/I ~ ~S51Q~~Z ~NfQ~11~9 NOI1'd ~b~ ~S4~bZ`QbZ ! %b'S3~ ~sb31"5L1 ~S~Z9`~cb t~/u r~/u ~599S~1rd %L'~ ~SZ~cb~cl ~s~b'_'OI Flu e/U ~scd~l~~ ~SOO~'09 ~s~89'S~ ~S9L0`bZ ~SbOG ~ ~5~14~~bZ ( %9'L ~S~9L~ZZ ~sbg~~~l ~Srd51`ZI ~SI~Z'Z ~S~L~'g ~~'d?~ ~1~f l01 NO I1 I QQ'd ' ~(1Q~ MAN ~l01~3NN0~ ~l~ I15I X~ ~ r~MOa~~ (~sgi~z'gbz) 5~~~ ~ ~~o~g ~o-~ N01511~i~[~f1S ~+~zl~H~ 1511~`d ~~aoz '~i, ~Nnr a~l~a `~s~zo~bo~oeo ~oN -~~N~~ ~.li~nww t ~~N~~►ns~v i aoo-t~ s. Ito a~i~N~ i 5~a s*~ ~a~a~+~sNn) x ~~toz ~v i s i , (5~b'~ I~t~ 51 1'd141) ~5zlb'~ ~ZZ 51 Q~QQ~ ~ ~Hl OS ' S?.~'d~ t~i~ I Ol Q~S'~~~l~N I S 19N I >{?.~'cf d H~~(1H~ ~Hl ~"(I HM "SZJ'd ~ tr N'~d ~zll(12~~r.~ S~I1I1I~'cf~ NOI1'd~~Q~ MAN ~t~l ~52~'d~ BIZ ~NI1'C101 (0 aN~ (fig) ~sn ~tMO 5.11 ~k0~ ~NI~J'dd Sb`H 9NIc~~I(19 NOIl'v~~f1Q~ ~N11S1>C~ .~na~ a~~o~o~~ '3~'d H19Z 'M ~ cn c ~ ~ ~ o ~ z ~ ~ ~ -i m 0 ~9N`~ a~do~~~~a ~a -~~iM ~i ~~o~e ~Z 101) NOISII~IQ4f~ ~Hl ~4 NOI1 'liW2~~ .l9 S I SS~~02~c! 3H1 ' H~z!(1}~~ ~Hl S'd ~1`1~M ~'d 9N I Q- i n~ ~o ii~a~na~ -i 'and 4NZ~ 'M 1 ~l IS m r ~ z cn ~ ~ D ~ ~ -i a~~in~~~ ~Ni~~~d a~v~ `~uia-tine Noii~~na~ ~~ilsix~ of Nai.~iaa~ (I >I~O"19 ~I 101) NOISIl~IQ9~5 ~H1 ~O NOIl~Od SIHl '3N0 1'~I1N~QIS~z! S) ~ zo-~o-dns '3~b` H18~ 'M o ,OOOZ L ~3~'d~S al~~i(l~~Z! 9NI~Z!'dd '9 i L.0~90-SW 10"~ - 1'd101 , y4332i~ 23t~3~~ J g ~r ~o-~o-dns D ~C7 10-~b0-SW D ~-Lb-dn~ 9N I ~lZJ'ad ~t7 Q I-9b-dn~ ~c~b"~SQZ!'v'H N011`d2~Od2~0~ 11.~02~c~-NON Oab2~0~0~ d `H~2~t1H~ 1SIld'd~ 40 '3~d Hl-bt~ 'M -~b-l~M '~~'v"~SC:~I~I'~`" fi ®r.. s e 1 1 1 d Oft SOXV A PA Zoo r -t ~in I N I daw ~ i ij6mf _ J i 1 r .Y~ .Y~ fr- ,:mow i ~ t ~t ~ ff~ l V t~ . I I i C s r • • ~i s r c ~ t~ i r- ,y _ 1 e, ~ i 1 f l~ ~ _ ~ ~ r ~ , w.~a~ .sar t S' i .n n - e . .rwr +e a.s ear a _ ~ w,. ~ ~ i 1 ~ :i ti :~.w.. r..• ."~mw.....~ r j i f ` f t 4 1 „ ry , ,r ,.w.... ~ r ~ r- _i ~ .,.1 m ~ i ,..r. ;t ...w s „ , ~ tiw r . . r~. H..,.. ~ , h , .,......m .M. „ } ~ F< ~ • r :s'~ ? ~ /1~1 5 ~ i ~ t, ~I t t',:~ L r 4 ~ n ` fr { :s, l s` r ~ ~ - i - ' -Part 3 _ 1a 1 f , . ~ lit w . , ;.e ~ , 3 ' C r lr ~«v 1 r ~.~F:n nS:: t e ~ f t t iil~;.•..j~. 1 ~.v ~ .Y. t +r j 1 ~,i Yru y~,_ R + - q -~t ' ~ a i 4, e. ~ f ' J y`V- ~ r r It ' ~3~ _ f ~ V'~ ~r l< t 1 S 1 ~ i { ~ , :i ti _ ..J k • ~l a .r ' !I ~ 11 ~ v. Z / ~ ~ ,s ~ ~ a ..w.! , ! ! r~ _ -s, ~ 4 ,3 j X S ~ / ~ 5 ~j~ rrn' , \ ~ ~ / n - ,ii / l' l~ ti ~ W„ 1 'c ~r \ t'ih. ` ~ _ - ~ t t iii i 1 al f { 1 91 Q 5 rw~ y\\~ ur , .ra- xr.r.. rc.. w. r ..n.~L.wM~✓ r v ` , ~ > s ~i 1' ~ tin.. a.~ v $ s ti` p i j y . ~ ) ~ L e J\ 1 1 ~ ~ } ( ~ S 4 j ~ x r ~.I' .w. ~ i11YYl~ V j ~ ~ ~ , ~ ; ~ a } 4 7 ~ J ~ _ x ~ I s I t r/ J > > lr ~f~~~ i; ~ t t 3 { T ~ J { I S r r 2 _ ■ Ea, ` t ~ S ~ ~ t, ` i ~k \ 1 1 6 ~ r' 1 ( ~n~ S r-,\, T ~ 1~ ~ ~ ' t f r ~ ~ j l f ) of n., s x "4 ~ ~ ~ t \ ~t L At, S F < J \ ~ i 1 i F.1~ ICI S \ a b ~ t 1 d' ti: Y r, ' f t 'iE: ~ ~1 Y' t ` t r ~ f I, t ; 7 ~ ` t Y ~ r ~ i t ~ s ri o = T '~,1 ~4 vN Y ~ X ~ 4„ ~ _ ~r "i ~'+a r , 5 ~ .r'°~J 2 r ~ ~ ~ ' 1 '1, f e, j t I M' r a :s r t~ i • y 1 T i 4 i , l+ a i4 V F x~' C t / ' t i ~ x..w i ; f ~ •.'.1, ^ l 71' ~r fr ~ s L ~r r 7' i ~ r „ . / t ~ ' Jx~ e~ Y FF~ 1 a ~r 't ~t f .nM a4 ~i f 1 L f r i ? . f,` t r i-_~ i f - - j s1, , : t t ~ A ~r . f <<'~ i 1{ / ~ ~ iR r~ t I 1 L t 2 ,N r ~ c fr 1 > j I 4 1 t 1. ~ J S ~ ,r'~ 3 f ~ t ~ r D S i~ y . 1. t i Y ~ ~w J i F ~ ~1 r i + ~y'° e~ ' f ~ ` N ~ ` i y ~Y.~ , vfi y A , . `s ' i t ~ J ~ 3, ; m w. -w Y- i j ~ H.~~ f n S'~=t ^Z{ i _ } ~ i ~ 1 } X i f < .N l f , } '~i ~ ~ r is ,u aiwrm ~Ao®r ",kill, lift mama* err V. -~~~iir ~rr► 4., j i Y ' f ~ •r r' ~ j' ~ ~ AIM zz ~ ~ * ~ v~ eJ,. D .,_y r ` ~v ~ ~ j..~ ~ ~ ~ 9002 `8 15Y1r~t1FI o-,i = ~eii a~d~s T i suoi~~naja ~uipllnq uot~~~npa 91 g b ° g ~i 3 -l _ opeaolo~ `a~pi~ ~~aqM H~`~~1H~ ~LSI~LdjdS QO : ~i~~ l [ ~ 0 f E~ ✓ 1 i :ter _ f ■ { i L ► c~_- s 1 r- r' __,Y i _ - one ~ i ]f1!"-. t rL dooa do 1Niodaiw - -k ~ z T ~ _ 7 ..O-, b~C l - ~t G~~', ~*t'~` I I i ii~~~ ~ ~ I V J7 -----~-~--1--~-----T--~-----------T--~------~---T-- , ~-,---,---r-- I I I I I i I I _ _ I I I I I I I I - 7 T - ~I I I I~ - ~T TI~ - ~I I I ~1~~~~1~ I I =~F~ I I ~r~ _ - -~1 ~=~1 I I I~-~ ~-~UI I ~~~l~~~ I ~IIL=1 II_= III I I VIII _ II II =III I I III I I II III I I Ill II II III I I VIII II II III I I VIII II II III I I ~II~ I I tt ®'~i V'✓ -----~--~---~--r--- r------- _J L- ~ I I_ _ I I I I_ ~ ~~~7T-~1 I I 1~-7 ~ i I~~~ ~-~1 I I I~-~1 ~ ~ III II II III I I III II II ~ L-J L-J z _ - - 00 _c I_ 1 I I i I F" J J i = ~ t 9002 `8 ~sn~n~ f SLIOi ~.L ~l~j a .~O~.~aLILi~~ ,9~ ,g o '"i-_ 1 . op~so~o~ `a.~pt~ ~~au~ it E+ a~u `s~s r I f s f f E N O I 1 l~ V I ~ ` i s ~oo,~ ~+s~~►~~ s~ 4 ~ 15J1~ i „0-,001 Ji 1 I Z400'1~ HSINI~ CtN0~35 1 1 7■_ ..O-, ZI a *a r a ~f t~ 1 y !  ! E! 1 JOO~f~ H51N1~ Q211i-Il ..O-,t~Z i J 1 ~1;~ -=u=- r ~d'dZl'dd ~O d01 ,.O-, 43~ ~00?~ ~O d01 .,o-,z~i -u~ T:: _ ~ ~ 'i~_ ~NIQ"il(18 9NIISIX~ ?JOO'1~ 1S?J I ~ „O-,i~01 1 vuaasr , ~NIQ"i1f19 ~N1151X~ ~u Zl00"i~ QN0~3S ..D-,911 _ ~NIQ"11(19 ~N1151X3 Z{00'1~ Q2{IHl a~ „0-,4321 I r 11 I T_I I II 1 I l T 1 _L-L GdbN*dd ~o d0.1 1 X0021 =4O d01 ~adda~~dd -40 dol I „O-, Zbl ~ .4oo~l 40d0i ~~r~~~~~ ~~t~~~ ~ ~ 9002 `8 lstt~nd ..o-.. _ ..en a,v~s Zt00"1~ H51N1~ ~ ! f t t3 ~1 ~ Y~ suot~e~aja ~uipjtnq uoi~~~npa 91 ~g ~r Y opp.~olo~ `a~pi~ 1~a~IM f H~`~~1H~ ~LSIZd~g QO ~ ~~Idd~ yy~ T~ rY _ S i i 1Z i ~ i' - - } f " i NO I1'dI~~~1~ 1~53M _ -L a. I 4. w ~y _ _ s~, _ . _ _ - r - ..~.J-.- r ~~"r E I . S t-' t~_ - Illq~gyl ~M .F 'SN~I SSd~J 1`dl~ `a~31HS ~aIS~SfIOHfM 1~~2~ ~~Qlfl~`12~OHS`E SH ~2i WO~Z Z~S~1 S 3 Q ~dI..UM 1HJIl d3~Jb' 1 2i01~~1~32~ S ~dAl aN`d d01 a323t11X~1 a 2~`d~1~ HlIM ~80~J S~bS g Q n 3d.ll ~Ilb'WSRJd a~W W9L b 1~Sa ~ ~ ~ ~ "SN3~ SSt/l~ 1`dl~ `~101~~~~~2~ ~ ~ K~ I q ~ I d UI X~ f ~ ~~Ol(l~ `l~IOHS £21 W05Z Z~S~I 6G 8 ~dAl HlIM 1HJIl'd~2~b 'SN3~ SSbI~ lt/l~ `~101~31~~2~ ~~Olfl~ `1230HS W05Z Z~S~I Z6 tl ❑ Ac 3d.ll HlIM 1H~Il'd~ati uoi;dia~sa4 aagwnN ~o~e~e~ ~1D ~aq~~ Ioq~~S G ~ « i f~ p ~~na~H~s ~~i~Niwn~ =r tY V } S~` „ e.r t/'~4 'f~j '/'fit '/yf '/~F ~}jF 0'0+ 0'0+ 0'0+ 0~6+ 0'0+ 0'0+ 0'0+ 0'0+ Q~Q+ 0'0+ 0'0+ 0'0+ 0'6+ 0'0+ 0'0+ 0'0+ 1 '0y 0'0+ l~ ~ ~y h ry n ry ; V V V'~ ~'V ~'W :Q0 °~0 OQ 00 4~ + + + + + + + + + 00 ~ ~ + + + i- iJ ~ to ~ ' ~ V ~ L Y ~ ~ LJ ~ It ~ ~ ~ V ~ V :OQ 40 00 0~ ~Q LO + + + + + + + 0~ + + + + + + + + + [i+ it ~ + <i i. ~/~r /ry./+~ ~f /y~ ~/~4 )/y~ 7 L' V Y ' ~ ~ I ' V L7 V' U ~'t,! V' ~ W ~ ~ ~ V V~ V V V V V U ~ f~ ' Oil 0 0 0 + + + + + + + + + 0 Q , + + + + + + + , + + , C7 ~ .^r~V.. ,.,.y, : . _ ,Y , ,~..w....., , ~r . . , ~ + r + + + + a- + + , , ~ .,rt t' 4 ~ a a ~ ~ ~ i~ ~ + + + + + :r, + + + ! ` ~ t sz t i;' ' "s }'i ;3 s ~ ~ t. OZ `9G 9Z Z~ 6~ ~Z ~Z + iI- ~ + + + + k, + s 4 ;.j S? i ? s i ;i at ~ t j it i i ; x. ~ ' ~ , ~ 8 , ...~~.Z ~ ~ b ~ _ t ;5 d ~ Q~ + + + + + + + + + + t ~k,. ~ - ~3 i t:' ~ 4;~~ ;Q + + ~ is , 4s Est , M {y r j; A r 1 n,:c,~ Z' q~ ' :i } }ryA +r~ i 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p.,".1{,i.,~,,., .+pF,~ U Y ~ JU (iWJ tJA~ tUA tCtA t!f F ~ + + + + + + + ~ ~ t. , ~ i } i . 0 0 ~ ~44 ;Q ~s Q 3 , ~ + + , + + 4 ' S. ~ j ~ i ~ t.i t ni S it a. ? r, z 'i ~ ~ ~ ~ G ~ + + + + + + + ~ x ~ + sf + + + + b: + + s 5i ~ f ; t„ , ,,a; ~ _ , t ~ , , , ~ , j V , ; ~y S 'a: if ; iZ'`~ :t Y'L L'Y .t ~ `tL~ .d t ; $ i~ n V ~ 1.! ~ U M' ~ V i ;V ~ ~ V U+ u L~ V V+ V+ , v+ ~ 1- j" "C Y T 'r i ~ f ~ + r , , . , ~ s v ~ a~ r..r ~ f~y~ ^f~, ~/~r [{I ~/~j ~/~J ~j~f /~Ajy ~(~F ~ ~ V' l1 iF k ti ~ ~ t J ii ~ ~r ` L, V Jy~ . f r ~ V 2: ri.-:•1J ~i s r a f>, t V ~ L I ✓ V V a V V ~J i { + { ~ f V ?l.1 i 1. V ~ V~ V V r V LI V V ~i a}?.: , , r • 'y r :fin.. S cz 1• , . i2 t `y r.. ` $ 4~ tf ,1 i 31 ~ / pnxx'~n y/~ s Y, i ~Q L~ Q~ ~ Z ~ ~ 1.9 ~ + ~ a~ ~ + ~ + ~ + a- + + + + ~ Q qG QG E~ Q~ 0~ ~iQ 0~ Z~ t; Q0 q~ 00 a + + + + + + + p~'~~ t 'a o~a ~o o~~ I'E ~ ; 1n ~ ~ ~ L'~ ✓ Y QC 'G ~Z 9L 8~ 9 Gz L~ LG ~Z Ob Qa d QO f~E 5Q 6 ~ + ~ + + + + + + ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ z ~ G ~~~:~..,:,:::-,N~:,~:~::.. , ~ o o a o ~ .r , , ,.r + + + " ' ~ + ~ ' iz S , + r• + ~ ~ , ~ 3 ,,,c, . . , . , . ~,e , N.. r d; m,,,.. r . „ f, S~ Z~ 6Z = 6Z Z£ ,ti, + ~ + ^F ~ .H~,..~.F....~.,.,.,, .,~n , r.;,r r.; s 2:'~,.'. ~ .,ices' . _ r.. .f" k. r f! , ~:i f ~ ' + ;t + .i . i . r... ~ j; j ~ « - w.,., „ , , j S } t ;f if ~ ~ z r tD ~ 0 0 ~ + + + + r r+ { r+; k' ~ + ~ r ~ _ _ ~ ~I r 3 It , _ , ~ h - ~ CD # ; No. 's;' l r ` 8' G ~'z . r...,:.G~.c .z G z L~ 9 z 8~ , ; + , ~k t z zt r _ F i Z ~y v,.,,_.. ~ it r3 a a R td 1i~ : i V~ 5 ~ t f ~j t2 ~v t 1 .,.N ~ 0 ~ {l 0 0 ,,.~~~,3 ~•~rc. G ~ ~ ~ 6 0 ~ ~Z ~ G t} 0 0 L ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ + ~ ; + + + + ~ , + + + ~ ~ + ~ , nT.;W r, s,o- ~ s7 C; .~n ..,+#r.~~.... .n, .t1 ; . 3y ~ ~ to t w 'I ii .._.......N. ; s ~ ; ; 'mom`'. rah ~ s ~ ? t . ;z ~ ~ . n *M.~.► a z + ~ -f~ 'f' ~ 14 1~;. T z we ~a~. `.®si! A24 fl C.QX1'aiel{~.019t P,i :a Ck A, ~t% S ~i 7 i'. M dt_q, ~y.F g &,rlyy g~r~~ •:iR. Y.~~G ~~tl fY'?'1 Iii ~~.1~....#~,.,... ~~-d.Li~i~~nY~2 s 1RR.,,. k Y~ t;~t~~ Y~ ~ i i ~ ~ ~ •P .,.a zz t~z z£ 9z :z t~z G1 4 Q' V' V iY V ~ z ~ 'r ~ ~h + + + -F ; ~ ~h -F Z~ 08 6 ~~3 L~ Z~ 9G ~.:k + + + + s... u ~ ~ ' i f ~i ~ n, . ..ri i ,~t w sr i ' ~ ,A s t; v,_~ f 'Z L'Z ~'Z ~ Z ~ Z Z x ,t f tv S ' ~ t/ j 1 S~ I 0 0 0~ r ~ 0 a 0 ~ a z 0 + + + + + + -r 4 ~}~)~r i ,r y ~ ~ r+ iV ~ ,.f i is i I ~^l oQ oo,, ~a ao ,;~a ` . , ~ ~ . ~ ~ , . , s` t ~ .ti i- t ` i z Q ~ ~ U iii ~ .t~ l1b ~,J E:..:` ~ ,.f , .p, : • r, ~f./ ' ' tS~ 's/ ~ ~ < Qa ~ f ~ f y.. £ 00 0 0> Qua ~ ~ Q 0 + ~ + + + ~ ~ ~ x f ip 1 l ~ .a t, :7 ~ .7 ~ ri V 4/ ~ 6 G ~ ~ ~.,L Q z ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ,f , + + + + f' ~ , i ? i~.t t 'V ~ ' . C R" yJ ~ q Y ~ ~ V ~ ~ f' t r ~ , , s s t:, ~ ~ a ~a ~q sz L9 ~ ~ + rn it i S , 7 7f. {rai, ..,....u a, i t, ~ ~ ~ti,,_ 6 8 0.. L Q ~8 z' , ~„~~..f r,. a ~ Q:~ Q ~ 0 + + + ~ , ~ 0 0 0 0 a ;,a r ~ + ~ + + 1 t(---y' r js . Q ~ ~ , . { . ; f~ Q ~ f~ ~ a, F + ~ . r ~w/ t, t" i 7,ti ii d r, (~t1 9`Q~r~ v_ i , i PV is s , ro 1 S r :a, t.Lf lf~, G. V ~ V,_rk.7= . .r~. /'Q ~•4J Yy , 4i~.~i r' i - t , {5r ~'o ~o ~q ~a z ~~o,, . ~ , .fir",,' { is r l i { yi •i f: i rU~ 'i .,~r ~I ~Y+'~a Yti 1J r i + + + + + ~ + i' ` f i t • i s ' ~ ~ 9 . z:•0' z q ~ ~ ~ , F i { ! << s j ,m. z• V V V t~ .....~,p . ~~Z ~ £ ~ L ~ ~ ~r ~ Q 0 ~ q ; t~ . ~ + t . , ~ r + ~ + + + + 't1 ~ q ~ s QQ E0.°~ 00 OQ .~qQ ~ f,~ + + + r,. ?r : t ~ Q'0 ~ a . } s{ ~ 0 L ~ ~ 0 0 q 0 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ , . + + + + t ` y. ,~:.0. QZ QO ~b0 . ~Q ~0 a3ilel~q~~ ~ + ~ a~ , ~ + + r f ~l. .~r :'u . ~~138 ~q 1(~3SNgq ~ , S! gN12f33NIg3V3 ~d N~J11~ M 3Nl 1figH11M 5~f3Cil ~q 1N~Wflggq ;/~r y'~~y l/~~ H 4 ^~~(+yy` {``I~ary~ 1t~~'}, yI «~I ~yry }ryy ~ t` ,~.7~.r~ r.. ..n .i - ~ N ~VI I ~~T •V~4~w..FJ~I~t\J /\iJ I..F 1J xi ~ ~ ~ s ~ 8'Q oL'~ G'z 6'0 9'0 q0 q0 X00 ~0 90 ~E L~ + ~13dq~d 3H! S! N13~3H ~31~t~Od~QgNl + + + + + + + + + ~ + ~ ~0 ,ll + + n~rs r.w -~e3nn^tnkit IAI'3lNf't~Yl1f1 CILfI i. i rr`": A n. 90OZ IHOIW\doo 3 1 g.. ,F,.h gat..... r.. r .:..r......... 9' l 6 (S t~`( `0 0'0 0'0 0-0+ 0 U 0 U ..~~~s,~.~kE►~~Vr~ ~'~ax~ 44- + + + 8-0 s + i0 1, G+r LZ+ 60+ OGL+ ~ + q+ ~ C + Z ~ I ~ + ~0 4- 4- 9* L 0* ~ G+ tz CG G L f 97 ~ + + rO !,0 1 3 F~~ - ; •0 Z O t7'o L-0 L 9~ 0~ c 8 GQ GL i>~~ x;~ + + + + + + + 1 -0 -0 9 4,0 9,0 9 f ~f o V0 -~1' V V 0 O CO VQ z0 s0 £0 s ur,. "0 V0 z0 Z0 i0 0 c0 + + + + + + + + + 1 0"-) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0-0 1 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 + + + + + + 00 00 00 00, + + + + + `''v `:1 g i i i, 1 Y` V 3nsi i ~a Li 1 1 i • r~ 5 I ~ A, ~ ~r , ~ 1 , ~1 ~'1, ~ ~`t, ~ 'F` ~ 1 ~ ~L ~ ~ ~ , ~ i' i ~ { ~ ~ l `l~' r ~ ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ I ~ ~P t <e ~ , ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ,1 'I ~ \ s , ~ ~ r, ~ I ~t ~ I 1 'I J~ ~ , . ~ ,s i ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ I x ~ ti ~ f ~b $ ~ 3 i F 1 P f ` ~ i i ' K • i ? . ~ i ~ A . r ~ ' i ~ ii I ' ~ ~ j~ r` i ~ ~ ~ , I 1 f i e f; 1 ~ r: , ~.Ep~ I ~i' ~ i ~ 2~: s^~ 1 q' ~ a s t ~ ~ ~ i i i ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ a ~ .a ~ a`-' { 'i.. y~ \ i } i ` Jr . i ~ yi `1 ~ . . ! N ` 3{]) ~ 3 ~ F 1111 t 1l r ` sa ~ ~ _ ar{, } ~ ~ I{ ~1 3 I 1 ~ ~ ~ st' p ~ f ~t 1 t v` ~ ~ , . ~ ~ ~ 4~' s ~ p, b~ ~ ~ ~ 1~ } i. ~ ~ r' r I ' i 1 ~ , i l ~ ~ 5~ ~ ~ l `x ~I, 1 JG 1 ~ ~ st' ~ ~ M ~.~W_.._... E 3 ~ ~ ~ ` tiJ Vf ~ 1 Y "7 ~ %y 9 ~ ` ~ ~ ~ 4i I ry=' ~ ~ C~✓~ 3., `~i" _ [ ~ ~a .x -s, ' ,:.y ?4 7 csr, 4 ~ v. s,~, a~;~x ' ;a t~' ~ ~ r, i`'~ C Y ' . ~..T. ~ w..,. i i ~ i i. ~ t~ t 1 ~ I: ...x.. w , ...vim ~ 'l. a~ I F ~ ~ f ~ , . 'w~ .e, . ~ p~ r ~ A ~ ~ + ~ ~ L: ~~w.. ~ ~ . aJ ,l._-~...,,_....., ~Aa 1~~ . ,,u..._.. f ` ~ 1~ i ~Ge I 1 i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~f ~ro ~S~ J mL v. ~ ~ 1 a_ , di r'' . .,,f. A ,q r w n.. ~ ~ one 1 1 4 m... . 4 • ~p$ w ~ ~ iF{0 1 S~ "k t 1 f ✓ ]i f, r ~4 K. T I w ~r ~ , ~ _ r > u~.. ~r~~ ~..a_,... gyn. rn~. ~ r a u Y i ~ ( ~ a s ~ : ~ . ~ r., ; i a . , ~ -s :tip' ~ NI c ~ r~ 3 :4 ma ~f. gr ~ ~ ~ Y ti ~ ~ { ~ u a.~ f ~ ~ 4 ~dt ~ ~ ~ a I ` ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ s I ~ ,s r~ ~ i \ ~ r, I ' ~ Ye I I / ` ~ y ~ ~ ' r,/' / ,R~.. I ~ G i I / . p , I i` ~,P i r 4 3 ~ ~ ~ I `p ¢ 4 ts:. ~ ~f. I ~ ~ ~ d~ ~ d t uu 6~ ~1 ~ .b ~ ~a. t , \ 4 ~ k 1 1 ( s i N ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - ~ f~: °u ~ ~ N y~Y ~ 'L 'y .e c a « i , tE s w g~ x q~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ 3, I ~ ~ ~ , ~ rE i 1 'gn,' , r r ' f TM`s - t . `t ' ~ I ~ ~ \ i x G Y. ~~lTN fT. .a,_ i yq~~, ~s ~ 1.. ' r FNP! ~ ' i ~ ! N 1 I 4 E A i ` ~ 't i ~ ~ i ~ 1 ~ ~ , t ~ ~4 ( we I ~ i / I - I r. 1 i I ;i; - ~r- ; ,~y I ; i f I ~ I I~ I ~ { I ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s,~ xj. i N~a J 1 I r I ~ ~ ~ f• ~ ~ I ~ , ~ ~ I ti ~ ~F I V ~ . ~ ` ~ ~ , ' E ~a f ~ 1 1 ~ ~ i 1 ~ ~ ' ~ i l ~F ~ E f -r r ~ t c ~ ti,. t d, 3 5.: ~ i { ~ 1 I ~ R r s` ~ ' l .-~e._  _w~ I y 1 14 t 1 , MI, ,x ~ _ ~ s . h , - _ 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 303/235-2846 Fax: 3031235-2857 August 14, 2006 Tina Dill, Project Manager City of Lakewood Community Planning and Development 480 South Allison Parkway Lakewood, CO 80226-3105 The City of Wheat Ridge RE: Lakewood Case #OR-06-011/OR-06-013 Wheat Ridge Case #SUP-06-04/MS-06-04 Applewood Baptist Church Dear Ms. Dill: ti In regard to the projects referenced above, please find attached one copy of the revised traffic impact study and special use permit plan set. Please review at your convenience.and return comments to me. If I can be of farther assistance, do not hesitate to contact me at 303-235-2848. Sincerely, Meredith Reckert, AICP Senior Planner City of Wheat Ridge ~oF WHEgT~/ Community Development Department = ° v m Memorandum ~o~oRAO~ TO: Dave Brossman FROM: Meredith Reckert SUBJECT: Applewood Baptist Resubmittal DATE: September 5, 2006 Attached are three copies each of the revised subdivision plat and preliminary drainage report for the Applewood Baptist Church. Please review and return comments at your convenience. City of Wheat Ridge Depathn nt of Public August 21, 2006 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 7500 WEST 29T" AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 Mr. Gary D. Theander, P.E. Mountain States Engineering, Inc. 12860 W. Cedar Drive, Suite 102 Lakewood, CO 80228 (303) 235.2861 FAX (303) 235-2857 Re: - Second Review Comments of Special Use Permit Site Plan and Traffic Impact Study received on August 10, 2006. Dear Mr. Theander, I have completed the review of the above referenced documents for the Applewood Baptist Church Expansion Project located at 11225 W. 32"d Avenue, and have the following comments: Drainage Final Drainage Report 1. No Final Drainage Report was included with this submittal. Final Drainage Report (Appendix) 1. No Final Drainage Report was included with this submittal. Preliminary Drainage Plan 1. No Drainage Plan was included with this submittal. Surveying Final Plat 1. No Final Plat was included with this submittal. Special Use Permit Plans 1. The Legal Description for the Special Use Permit should match only the southerly lot boundary as created on the Final Plat. Otherwise, all land uses including any associated limitations that were established by the SUP will extend to the northerly parcel as well, which may yield some unintended consequences. 2. For the Site Plan: a. Show all existing and proposed easements per the Final Plat. b. The detention facility needs to match the final site design of the Building Permit plans. No "conceptual' layout design, or notes stating the detention facility as shown is only conceptual in nature, shall be allowed on the SUP Permit Site Plan. 3. Need to include the native seed mix design, along with the rate and method of application. The City standards for use of native seeding shall be adhered to (please refer to the City seeding standards attached to this letter). Applewood Baptist Bxpansion2006_ xeview2.ltr.doc Traffic Engineering A copy of the Traffic Impact Study was forwarded to the Engineering Division Manager, Mr. Steve Nguyen, P.E., 303.235.2862 for review, and the following is his response: • Please see attached memo. The Public Works Department requires two signed and stamped copies of the Final Drainage Report/Plan, Site Plan, Traffic Impact Study, and Final Plat along with a CD-ROM (or DVD- ROM) containing the Map (in AutoCAD.dwg format). Please provide these with the next submittal or Building Permit Application. NPDES Permit The Federal Clean Water Act implemented by the EPA requires that stormwater discharges from certain types of facilities as part National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) be authorized under stormwater discharge permits. An NPDES permit is required for all construction sites greater than one (1) acre in size. The area of disturbance for the proposed expansion is greater than one acre and shall therefore comply with NPDES regulations. The NPDES permit for construction activities is issued by the State through the Colorado Discharge Permit System (CDPS), and may be obtained by contacting the Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment, Water Quality Control Division. A copy of the CDPS Permit is to be submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to issuance of the Major Grading/Landfill and Building Permits. Application for Minor Dumping/Landfill Permit Prior to the commencement of any onsite grading, an Application for Dumping/Landfill Permit, along with the fees due will need to be submitted for review and approval. This Permit is generally issued at the time of the Building Permit. Right-of-Way Construction Permit(s)/Licensing Prior to any construction of utility service connections, public improvements, etc. which lie within the public right-of-way, the necessary Right-of-Way Construction Permit(s) and respective licensing will need to be submitted for processing by the City. Right-of-Way Construction Permits are issued only after approval of all required technical documents, including but not limited to, the Final Drainage Report & Plan, Final Plat, Final Development Plan, Traffic Impact Study, Storm Sewer Plans, Street Construction Plans, Grading & Erosion Control Plan, and any easement or ROW dedications. Drainage Certification Required Prior to C.O. Upon completion of the drainage improvements, the Engineer-of-Record Mr. Gary D. Theander, P.E., shall provide to the City of Wheat Ridge a written, signed and sealed Drainage Certification Letter stating that the site grading was completed per the approved Grading & Erosion Control and Drainage Plans, all drainage facilities were constructed and shall function as defined in the approved Final Drainage Report/Plan, and that the site has been accurately surveyed to confirm that the grading and the construction of all drainage facilities was completed in accordance with these documents. The Drainage Certification Letter shall be submitted to the City for review and approval, and shall be accompanied with As-Built Plans for all constructed drainage facilities prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy. The As-Built Plans shall be submitted as follows: Two (2) copies of the "As-Built" Plans are to be submitted: a. 1 copy is to be on bond paper, and b. 1 copy is to be on electronic media (CD-ROM) and is to be in AutoCAD.dwg format. Applewood Baptirt Expawion2006_ review2.1t.doc 2-Year Warranty Period for Public Improvements The Contractor shall warrant all work performed within the public right-of-way for a period of two (2) years, commencing upon completion of all constructed public improvements and Final Acceptance by the City Inspector. Prior to the expiration of said 2-year Warranty Period, if the City Inspector deems that the constructed public improvements are in such condition as to require repairs or replacement, the Contractor shall complete such repair work upon request per the City of Wheat Ridge Permit Testing and Inspection Requirements. Please return all redlined plans with the next submittal. If you have any questions, please contact me at 303.235.2864. Sincerely, David F. Brossman, P.L.S. Development Review Engineer CC: Steve Nguyen, Engineering Manager Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner He Applewood Baptist Expaasi=2006_ review2dtr.doc F HINGING c1. SEE PLAR MULCHING] - AREA OF SEEDING AND MULCHING. - TYPE OF SEED MIX (PERMANENT. TEMPoPA9Y, OR LOkYGRONtK Z ALL BRANDS FURNISHED SHALL BE FREE FROM ALL NOXIOUS SEEMS WOULDNG RUBSIAV OR CY1MVaN THISTLE, COARSE FESCUE EUROPEAN BINDWEED. JOHNSON BRAGG, KK4o WHR) AND LEAFY SPURGE. 'B THE SEEDER SHALL FURNISH TO THE CONTRACTOR A SIGNED STATEMENT CERTIFYING THAT THE BEEO FURNISHED IS FROM A LOT THAT HAS BEEN TESTEG BY A RECWNVED LABOWORY. SEED WHICH HAS BECOME WET, MOLDY, OR OTHERMSE DAMAGED IN TRANSIT OR IN STORAGE WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE SEED TICKETS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY UPON REMM. 4. DRILL SEEDING MIX SHNl CONFORM TO THE TABLE ON THE RIGHT: S. IF THE SEED AVNLABLE ON THE MARMOT GOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM RIFTYNiD GERMINATION PERCENTAGES SPECIFED, THE SUBCONTRACTOR MUST COMPENSATE FOR A UESSIER PERCERTAGE OF PURITY OR GERMINATION BY FURNISMNG SUFFICIENT ADOMORN. SEEM TO MUM, THE SPECIFIED PRODUCT. THE TAGS FROM THE SEED MUTES MUST BE SUPPUEDTO CONTRACTOR AND FORNARDED TO THECITYGESCINSFELTOR 6. THEFORMULAUSEO FOR DETERMINING THE WANPW OF PURE LASE SEED nS) SMALL BE (POUNDS OF SEED) X(PUNTY) X(GERMINATION) - POUNDS OFf IRE SINE SEED (PSIS} 1. PERMANENT SEED MIX SHALL BE USED UNLESS OTHETMISE APPROVED BY THE CITY. S ALL AREAS TO BE SEEDED AND MULCHED SHNL HAVE NITRETOPSOL OR APPROVED SOIL AMENDMENTS SPREAD TO A DEPTH OF AT LEAST S INCHES (LOOSE DEPTH). HAUL ROADS AND OTHER COMPACTED AREAS SHALL. BE LOOSEN ED TO A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES PROS TO SPREADING TOPSO L B. SOIL IS TO BE THOROUGHLY LOOSENEDMLLED) TO A DEPTH OF AT LEST S INCHES PRIOR TO SEEDING. THE TOP 6IHOPES OF THE SEED.. SHALL BE FREE OF ROCKS GREATER THAN 4 INCHES AND SOIL CLOGS GREATER THAN 2INCH ES. SEEM RE OVER MIT COMPACTED AREAS THAT H4VEMT BEEN THGROUGHLY LOOSEN ED SHNL BE REJECTED. _ IG SEED IS TO BEAPMEO USINGAMECHANICAL DRILLTO AOEFM OOtNINCH ROW 5PMANOSHNL BE NO MORE THAN 6 INCHES. MATERIAL USED FOR MULCH SHALL CONSIST OF LONGSTIMMED STRAW AT LEAST 60 PERCENT OF THE MULCH, BY WEIGHT, SHALL BE 10 INCHES OR MORE IN LENGTH. MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED AND MECHANIDALLY ANCHORED TO A DEPTH OF AT LE4ST2 INCHES. MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED AT A HATE OF LOM LS OF STRAW PER ACRE _ It IF THE PERMITTEE OEMONSTPI TO THE CITY THAT IT IS HOT POSSIBLE TO DRILL SEED, SEED IS TO BE UNI FORMLY BROADCAST AT TWO TIMES THE DNU.ED FATE, THEN UGHT V NARROWED TO PROVIDE A SEED DEPTH OF APPROXIMATELY 114 INCH. THEN ROLLED TO COMPACT, THEN MULCHED AS SPEONED MOVE 12 SEEDING AND MULCHING SMALL. BE COMPLETED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF INNIK EXPOSURE ORT DAYS AFTER GRADING IS SUBSTANTNIY COMPLETE IN AGN£N AREA I S DEFINED BY THE CRY} THIS MAY REQUIRE MULTIPLE MOBILOATIONS FOR SEEDING AND MULCHING. 13. MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED WITHIN 20.HWRS OF SEEDING. I4 TACMMER SHOULD BE UTUZED TO HELP W.TI STAWDISRACEMQiT. Pm*V# I Mf r TTY FM $PECIE9 VARIETY NOTES IN MI POUNDSOFFLS P R BIG BLUESIEM NAW PRW3 10 L1 YELLOWINDARBRASS CHEYENNE PRIME IS 1 SWITCHGNASS BIACHWHL PNWS 10 OA BOBCATS GPAAN VAUGWI PLANS 10 u WESTERN! WHEATGNASS MRI34 pNCS 10 1.8 BLUEGPAA, HACHTA PNWS 10 0.3 THICKSPXE WiIEATGFASs DR. PROS 10 1 PRNRIESANDREED GOSHEN PNWS 10 0.7 GREEN NEEDLEGRASS LODOWA PROD 10 1 SLENDER WAE4TGRASS pgyOR pNCB B 0.6 STREAMBMK WAEATGRA53 SODM PROS 5 0.6 TOTAL 93 1WPORW VML 9~NK SPECIES VARIETY NOTES NM POTNDSOFPS PER ACRE SMOOTH BROMEGRASS UNCON PICS 30 3.9 INTERMEDIATE ` OAHE PIGS 30 4 5 MIEATGIWS . PUBESCENT WHEATGRASN LUNA PICS 30 4.2 ANNUAL WIDOWS WA NCB 1S 0.8 TOTAL 134 L044IOM 0" d®bIB NIX 1. SEEDED AND MULCHED AREAS SHALL BE INSPECTED FOR REQUIRED COVERAGE MONTHLY FORA PER OD OF TWO YEARS FOLLOWING INITIAL SEEDING. REPAIRS AND RESEEDING AND MLCHING SHALL BE UNDERTAKEN AFTER THE FIRST BRO WING SEASON FOR ANY MFA, FNUNG TO MEET THEREOUIREOCOVERAGE 2 REQUIRED COVERAGE FOR STANDARD. OPEN SPACE AND LO'N GROM H SEED MBJR SHWI. BE DEFINED AS M-LOMk 1. THREE (3) PLANTS PER SQUARE FOOTWITHAMINIMUM HEIGHTOF3 INCHES. THE3F4NTS PERSOUMEFOOTSHALLMOFTHEVARIL M0SPMUFWNDINTHECIY-APPROYEO MIX 2 NOBAREMEA GERTHNI4SOUMEFEET(RY0.FEEFBYTVAFEETOREWNI.Tl. S FREEOFEROOMARF/S. 4. FREEFROMINFESFATONOFNOMOUSYJEEOSINACCOROMCEWITHSECIIOiMU0 E GESCCWMAMAhSJAL- SPECIES VARIETY NOTES %IN MIX MUNOSOFPIS MUM BUFFALOGIWS TEXOM PRIME 20 - 3.2 BLUE DRAMA, HACHTA PNWB 20 0.0 WESTERN ARAM PNCS m 33 WAEATGR/SS SIOMATG DRAMA VAUGHN P. 20 1.0 THICKSPSE WHEATGRASS CRTAKA PNCS 10 1 STREAM A WNE ATGpA55 SOOAR PNCS 10 1.2 TOTN 11.0 S REQUIMOCOVERAGEFORMRFGRASBARFASSHA NDMWDASFIXIO'A5 1. ATIEA W%VEGETAMWCOVEROFGPABSSFECIESFWTED. 2 NO BARE AAFAS URGER TFAN45OUPAE FEET (iW'0.FEET BYTWYYFEETOIEWNNENt). 3. FREE OF ERWEDARFAS A FREE FROM INFESTATION OF NOXIOUS WEEDS IN ACOORJNOEIWTH SECTOR SA OF THE OESCCNTENNMANWL M' RILLMD GULLY EROSION SHALL BE FILLED WITH TOPSOILPRIORTORFSEFDING.THE RESEEDING METHOD SHALL BE MFROV EO BY THE CR Y. EEJ i5EEDING AND AAULCHING of r r CITY OF HHEAT PIDGE DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DIVISION ~toR~a° APPW4W CT. " 10/04 E-A03 5EED.N0TE5 SEEDING AND MULCHING NOTES DETAIL CODE G City of Wheat Ridge \ Department of public Works MEMORANDUM TO: Dave Brossman, Development Review Engineer FROM: Steve Nguyen, Engineering Manager St4 DATE: Friday, September 08, 2006 SUBJECT: Applewood Baptist Church, 11200 W. 32nd Avenue, Traffic Impact Review #4 I have reviewed the revised traffic impact study, received August 10, 2006, to the above site and have the following comments. 1. Please discuss the current and future traffic control for pedestrian activities on 32nd Avenue. It is our understanding that the pedestrian crossing is a major activity on 32°d Avenue. The recent submittal has provided some additional discussion on this. However, please expand the discussion on short and long range detail plans to provide a standard traffic control in assisting the crossing pedestrians. The City felted that the pedestrian activity of the church use is significant and therefore it is important to convert to a standard type of traffic control to accommodate the pedestrian that conforms to driver expectation. This is a vital concern to the City since this activity is taking place in the City right-of-way. The fundamental question that needs to be addressed is would this pedestrian activity warrant a pedestrian signal in the near term or build out condition as outlined in the MUTCD? In the event that a signal is not warranted, what other consideration or design options to provide treatments that protect pedestrian and to effectively regulate safe speed at the crossing point underboth day and night time conditions. The City conducted an observation on 11/03/04 where pedestrian crossing activity took place at night. It reveals that the lighting condition at the crosswalk is not ideal as it should be to maintain adequate visibility between vehicular traffic, pedestrians and the uniform traffic controller. 2. Please provide source or basis for the %2 % annual growth on 32nd Avenue as indicated in the study. 3. The 20-yr projected volumes for the north site are significant to warrant a right turn deceleration lane as per the City Code per section 26-620. Thus, right-of-way dedication and the construction of the west bound deceleration lane is required. City of Wheat Ridge of WHEgTP Community Development Department = ° v m Memorandum cO~~RPp~ TO: Dave FROM: Meredith SUBJECT: ABC resubmittal DATE: August 10, 2006 Attached are three copies of the revised special use permit package including site plan and traffic report. Attached also is information regarding their activity schedule. Revised plats have not yet been submitted. Please review and return comments. This information has also been given to the City of Lakewood. l 0 AAe"w M Ive, N?& ~ A ICU1 0-, Y Kx'o o All -flu Al ~,Vr 4 a Applewood Baptist Church To u o s ~ ~0~ T levy ~ upper level il S th B di pp , - ng ou u ~ Yraxer :n. - e1'r. % Preschool 4f South Foyer we ar l from - ~ ea<,<wymswew cmv. of 104 pa park ivg lot) level u Chapel - ` oup up level Student Center Worship Main Level Center -Worship Center -Preschool (Birth - 3) < w l / D n obwerk el > -Chapel (Students) North Foyer -Welcome Center TM p I`L' I bI it 1 "l North Ev from 32nd sheet Upper Level To main 1~ ~ o main level euo sue~s~ -Choir Suite/Music Offices -Baptistry 30„. "13nP45113'aiid Pressing ..301 T. main lNel> <To main level y 102 1P8 S school} ' Lower Level p p I> -Preschool (4's) e ii -Fellowship Hall ©a -Hospitality Room Tr rm < uvm main kml > -Main Offices g ~?1 or r, Fellowship Resttoom (Women) rM>~: Hall M sy,. Restroom (Men) Welcome Center r4 v Preschool(Birth - preK) n up to in kwl > rttt}tjtjry~ LL1111 Stairs Stomgt Office;.. Main North na n 204 203 202 201 Y Building I~~ Main Level H 208 209-210 211 f -i 212-213 214-215 304 303 302 301 Upper Level 309 310 311 312 313 314 315-316 Restroom (Women) - X 104 103 102 101 Restroom (Men) ~ ~4 . BLAST Area (K-6) 1 Lower Level-BLAST Area ® Stairs H ' 0 111- 112 113 I4 Exit ~Ovf 7-' 7 7 Sundav School for all ages as of 7-2-2006 9:00 A.M. Preschool - Children Birth through Pre-K are grouped by developmental stages Birth thru 3-yr-olds Preschool Garden (main level) S 4-yr-olds (K minus 1 year) 102-108 S Children All classes meet on the lower level of the North building. Grouped by current grade. Kindergarten Rocket Room 111 N Grade 1 .....................................................................................................................Skylab 104 N Grade 2 ..........................................................................................................Solar Station 103 N Grade 3 Astro Suite 102 N Grade 4 Launch Control 101 N Area 56: Grade 5 & 6 202-203 N Students Jr. High Main Sunday School (Classes for every grade) Opening in Chapel Classes: 7th gr girls-Student office; 7th gr. guys-310 S; 8th gr. guys and girls-Chapel Adults Target Group or Life Stage Room/Building Adult 1 ...............................Adults 60+ (Retired, Semi-retired, Active Working) Wiiest Ladies 208S Cheadle Co-ed .......................................................................................206 S Gray Co-ed 202-204S Thomas Coed 201 N Adult 2 ...............................Adults 50+ (Empty Nesters) Oxford Coed-Bible Book Study Fellowship Hall S Adult 3 ...............................Adults 35+ (Children are Jr. High to college age)) Team Co-ed(children are elementary or youth) 303 N M. Kintzel ...........................Ladies....................................................................................... 304 N S. Kintzel ...........................Men.......................................................................................... 313 N Team Co-ed (Singles, age 35+).................................................. 212-213 N Graham Co-ed (children are elementary or youth) .....................Choir Suite S Owens Co-ed (children are elementary or youth) 302 N Adult 4 ...............................Adults 18+ (College, newly married, young married)) Paschall Co-ed (Young married w/without preschool children) 204 N Barden Co-ed (Neady/Newlywed wAvithout preschool children).................. 301 N Special Interest Deaf Bible Study Hearing Impaired Adults (Card)................................................ 209 N Newcomers ........................AIIAdults (Deardorff)................. Fellowship Hall Hospitality Room S 10:45 A. M. Preschool - Children Birth through Pre-K are grouped by developmental stages Extended Teaching Care Preschool Garden (main level) S Children All classes meet on the lower level of the North building. Grouped by current grade. Kindergarten Rocket Room 111 N Grade 1 .....................................................................................................................Skylab 104 N Grade 2 ..........................................................................................................Solar Station 103 N Grade 3 Astro Suite 102 N Grade 4 Launch Control 101 N Grade 5 & 6(Alternate) Galaxy Lounge 113 N Area 56 Worship R.O.A.D. Worship (Gr. K-4) ...............................Alternates weekly: Worship or Fellowship Hall S Students High School Main Sunday School (Classes for every grade) Opening in Chapel Classes: 9th Girls-206S, 9th Guys-208S, 10th Girls-204S, 10th Guys-310S,11th Girls-202S, 11th Guys-301 S, 12th Girls-Student Office; 12th Guys-Chapel Jr. High Alternate Hour (Combined grades) Fellowship Hall Hospitality Room S Adults ..............Target Group or Life Stage Room/Building Adult 3 ...............................Adults 35+ (Children are elementary/college age) McKendry Co-ed (children are elementary or youth) 302 N Adult 4 ...............................Adults 18+ (College, newly married, young married) Match Co-ed (Nearly/Newlywed wAvithout preschool children).......... 301 N Goodwin College Students..................,............................................ 202-203 N Special Interest Bassett/Dick Couples (Young-Median Married, Gender-separated classes)...... 204 N Estudio Biblico Spanish-speaking Adults (Baas) 214-215 N Romanian Church Sunday School and Worship (Pastor Manzat) 201 N Life stage and age range are given as a guide only. Adults may attend any class they choose. Color-coded snap on back 7500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Wheat Ridge 3031235-2846 Fax: 303/235-2857 June 9, 2006 Stanley Pouw Pouw & Associates 190 East 9a' Avenue Suite 250 Denver, CO 80203 Dear Mr. Pouw: This letter is in regard to your application for approval of a Special Use Permit to allow expansion of a church at 11225 W. 3Z d Avenue in an R-1 zone district and for a two-lot subdivision. PLAT I have the following comments regarding the plat document. SHEET ONE 1. Modify the Owners' certificate by elimination of the repetitive opening sentence. 2. Modify the Owner's certificate so it is consistent with the requirement for a plat with right-of-way dedications. 3. Designate who from the church will sign the document with name and title. 4. In the notary certificate, correct the year from 2004 to 2006. 5. Modify Note #2 to specify the correct flood zone designation for the southern lot as Zone X (unshaded). 6. Add the City's standard language for detention easements (see attached). 7. Modify the City Certification (for mayor) to be consistent with current language. 8. Add a certificate for the Planning Commission. 9. In the recorder's certificate, correct the year from 2004 to 2006. 10. Add the following numbers to the case history box: SUP-04-04, MS-04-01, SUP-06-02, MS-06-07. SHEET TWO 1. Designate Tract A as being for storm water detention purposes. 2. Show perimeter drainage and utility easements as 10' along front lot lines, rights of way and rear lot lines and 5' easements along side lot lines. 3. Add the following numbers to the case history box: SUP-04-04, MS-04-01, SUP-06-02, MS-06-07. Attached is a redlined plat. Also attached are referrals received from other city departments and outside agencies regarding the plat document. Public Works Department: See attached package from Dave Brossman dated May 30, 2006 Xcel Energy: See attached letter from John Keller dated May 30, 2006. Consolidated Mutual Water Company: See attached letter from Michael Queen dated May 30, 2006. Northwest Lakewood Sanitation District: See attached letter from Bill Willis dated June 2, 2006. SPECIAL USE PERMIT SITE PLAN Attached are my comments relative to the Special Use Permit site plan submittal. 1. Include a vicinity map. 2. Show dimensions for the property for this phase of construction 3. Add a legal description, which matches the subdivision plat. 4. Add a note that this portion of the property is in a Zone X (unshaded) as designated on FEMA's Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community panel no. 080509CO215E, dated June 17, 2003. 5. Will there be any fencing? Please show location, height and materials of existing and proposed fencing. 6. Is any additional signage proposed? If so, show location and size. 7. Show the location of dumpsters and proposed method of screening. 8. Modify the site data breakdown to reflect existing and proposed conditions relative to the categories shown. 9. In the site data breakdown, building coverage category, separate out the multi- purpose/education building coverage from the building "connector" coverage. 10. Show the total gross floor areas for the existing and proposed conditions. Please include gross square footage for the existing structure, the new multi-purpose/education structure and the "connector" space. 11. Expand the parking breakdown to show how the required formulas and calculations were done for the proposed conditions. 12. Add a signature line for the Community Development Director. 13. At least one of the eight required handicapped spaces must be a van space served with an 8' wide aisle. 14. Add a "Notes" section. 15. Under "Notes", discuss existing zoning and site development conditions. 16. Under "Notes", discuss proposed changes. 17. Add a case history box with the following case numbers: WV-93-6, CUP-96-1, CUP-97- 3, MS-04-01, SUP-04-04, MS-06-07, SUP-06-02. 2 18. Modify the note regarding future right-of-way to read: "50' ROW Dedication Reservation if Needed for Development of Lot 2. To be dedicated by separate instrument." 19. Correct typographical errors (easement, Wheat Ridge) in the detention pond note. 20. Remove the reference to lot size with the pond (7.25 acres). 21. Show opposing and adjacent curb cuts on W. 32nd Avenue. BUILDING ELEVATIONS Add a note relative to the building height definition in the zoning and development code. The vertical distance measured from the average elevation of the finished grade to the highest segment of the structure, measured midway between peak and eave line cannot exceed 35'. Please demonstrate using the elevations at the four building corners of new construction that this height limitation is not exceeded. LANDSCAPE PLAN 1. Plant material quantities are sufficient to meet the City's landscape code. 2. If fencing is proposed, show it on the plan with information as to height and materials. 3. The four new street trees along W. 32 d Avenue must be 3" in caliper. 4. In the landscape island to the west of the building, four emerald queen maples are indicated where only three are shown. PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 1. Add the following note: "Lighting shall be consistent with the provisions of Section 26- 503 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws." 2. All lighting fixtures are to be fully shielded and downcast. This would appear problematic with the freestanding fixtures around the building. 3. The footcandle readings are to be 0 at the property lines. Readings along the south, east and west property lines exceed 0. Please make adjustments to fall within this standard. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Please provide the following supplementary information: 1. A weekly schedule of activities in all buildings within the Church's campus with an average attendance. It has been indicated that most activities occur on Sundays and Wednesday evenings. This information should include standing meetings and/or activities and reoccurring special events. 2. Location of residence by city for the current membership. 3. Current membership total and anticipated growth for the next 20 years. Attached are referrals received from other city departments and outside agencies regarding the special use with site plan request. Public Works Department: See attached package from Dave Brossman dated May 30, 2006 and memorandum from Steve Nguyen dated June 7, 2006. Consolidated Mutual Water Company: See attached letter from Michael Queen dated May 22, 2006. Northwest Lakewood Sanitation District: See attached letter from Bill Willis dated May 22, 2006. Wheat Ridge Police Department: See attached email dated May 18, 2006 This concludes the summary of comments. Please address each of these comments by revising the drawings accordingly. For clarification on any of these issues, please feel free to contact any of the Development Review committee members: Community Development Meredith Reckert 303-235-2848 Public Works Dave Brossman 303-235-2864 Traffic Engineering Steve Nguyen 303-235-2862 Once the changes have been made, please submit five copies of revised plan sheets and technical documents plus original redmarks. If you have any questions or need further clarification, do not hesitate to contact me at 303-235- 2848. Sincerely, Meredith Reckert, AICP Senior Planner C: Gary Theander 4 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (303) 235-2861 City of Wheat Ridges f Department of Public Works 7500 WEST 29r" AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 FAX (303) 235-2857 May 30, 2006 Mr. Gary D. Theander, P.E. Mountain States Engineering, Inc. 12860 W. Cedar Drive, Suite 102 Lakewood, CO 80228 Re: - First Review Comments of Preliminary Drainage Report/Plan, Preliminary Site Plan, and Traffic Impact Study received on May 15, 2006, and the Final Plat received on May 23, 2006. Dear Mr. Theander, I have completed the review of the above referenced documents for the Applewood Baptist Church Expansion Project located at 11225 W. 32nd Avenue, and have the following comments: Drainage Preliminary Drainage Report 1. The Historical Drainage section needs to include a description of the historical sub-basins, flow patterns, runoff rates, etc. 2. Compare the proposed (developed) runoff flows to the above-mentioned historical rates and patterns. 3. Include the following in the Detention Section: a. The provided detention volume as well as the minimum required volume. b. State the criteria used in determining the "adjusted maximum release rate". c. Identify the location of the emergency overflow weir and flow direction. 4. The runoff from Sub-basin B shall be directed into the proposed detention pond and not simply to the north. State in the Report that at such time as the area north of this proposed project is developed the runoff from this basin may be altered - but for the interim condition the runoff is to be routed into the detention pond. 5. All specific technical review comments will be made at the time of submittal of the Final Drainage Report. Preliminary Drainage Please refer to the latest City of Wheat Ridge Site Drainage Requirements (Rev 4/06) found on the City website for current requirements, as some of the information in this Report is no longer valid, such as Table 3-1, and Figure 501, T-I-F curve (need to use Figure 5-1 for Wheat Ridge). Preliminary Drainage Plan 1. A swale from the proposed detention pond outlet will need to be graded to direct flows into the existing drainage ditch flowing into Lena Gulch. 2. The northeasterly portion of the site (due east of the proposed parking lot) appears that the proposed grading will substantially increase the slope and alter the existing flow pattern. This slope shall not exceed 3:1, and Public Works recommends that this slope not exceed 4:1 in order to establish ground cover and allow for proper maintenance. If a 4:1 slope cannot be met, an engineered retaining wall will be required. In addition, if the proposed grading in this area alters the historical drainage, some additions/modifications may be required for the final design. Applewood Baptist Expansion2006_ raviewl ltr.doc 3. Extend the existing contours to 50' beyond the boundary of the subject property. 4. Both the detention pond outfall pipe/swale and the receiving drainage ditch which outfalls into Lena Gulch will require drainage easements (see Final Plat). Surveying Final Plat 1. The detention pond outfall pipe/swale and the receiving drainage ditch (the existing ditch) which outfalls into Lena Gulch will both require drainage easements (see redlined Plat). 2. The (existing) ditch easement needs to run from the easterly property line to the Lena Gulch easement boundary. 3. Upon the development and subdivision of the northerly parcel, the above-mentioned easements may be vacated or modified. 4. Include a Note stating "Tract A is a non-buildable tract reserved for stormwater detention, and that Tract A may be vacated/consolidated upon the development of and relocation of the detention facility to, Lot 2, Block 1, Applewood Baptist Church Subdivision". 5. Please remove the duplicate owner information in the Legal Description. 6. Need to correct all dates in signature and certification blocks. 7. Need to show all existing and proposed easements, including the standard 10' front and rear and 5' drainage and utility easements per City standards. 8. Correct the county Reception Number for the existing 10' drainage easement along the westerly side. Preliminary Site Plan 1. Show all existing and proposed easements per Final Plat. 2. Include a vicinity map. 3. Need to show the Legal Description per the Final Plat. 4. Show the floodplain. Traffic Engineering A copy of the Traffic Impact Study was forwarded to the Engineering Division Manager, Mr. Steve Nguyen, P.E., 303-235-2862 for review, and the following is his response: • Please see attached memo. The Public Works Department requires two signed and stamped copies of the Final Plat, Preliminary Drainage Report/Plan, Preliminary Site Plan, and Traffic Impact Study. Please provide these with the next submittal. Right-of-Way Construction Permit(s)/Licensing Prior to any construction within the public right-of-way, the necessary Right-of-Way Construction Permit(s) and respective licensing will need to be submitted for processing by the City. Right-of-Way Construction Permits are issued only after approval of all required technical documents, including but not limited to, the Final Drainage Report & Plan, Final Plat, Final Development Plan, Traffic Impact Study, Storm Sewer Plans, Street Construction Plans, Grading & Erosion Control Plan, Traffic Control Plan, and easement or ROW dedications. Applewood Baptist Expansion2006_ reviewl ltr.doc 2-Year Warranty Period for Public Improvements The Contractor shall warrant all work performed within the public right-of-way for a period of two (2) years, commencing upon completion of all constructed public improvements and Final Acceptance by the City Inspector. Prior to the expiration of said 2-year Warranty Period, if the City Inspector deems that the constructed public improvements are in such condition as to require repairs or replacement, the Contractor shall complete such repair work upon request per the City of Wheat Ridge Permit Testing and Inspection Requirements. NPDES Permit The Federal Clean Water Act implemented by the EPA requires that stormwater discharges from certain types of facilities as part National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) be authorized under stormwater discharge permits. Construction sites greater than one (1) acre in size require an NPDES permit. The area of the proposed subdivision is greater than one acre and therefore shall comply with NPDES regulations. The NPDES permit for construction activities is issued by the State through the Colorado Discharge Permit System (CDPS), and may be obtained by contacting the Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment, Water Quality Control Division. A copy of the CDPS Permit is to be submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to issuance of the Major Grading/Landfill and Building Permits. Application for Minor Dumping/Landfill Permit Prior to the commencement of any onsite grading, an Application for Dumping/Landfill Permit, along with the fees due will need to be submitted for review and approval. This Permit is generally issued at the time of the Building Permit. Right-of-Way Construction Permit(s)/Licensing prior to any construction of public improvements, utility service connections, etc. lying within the public right-of- way, the necessary Right-of-Way Construction Permit(s) and respective licensing will need to be submitted for processing by the City. Right-of-Way Construction Permits are issued only after approval of all required technical documents, including but not limited to, the Final Drainage Report & Plan, Final Plat, Final Development Plan, Traffic Impact Study, Storm Sewer Plans, Street Construction Plans, Grading & Erosion Control Plan, and any easement or ROW dedications. Drainage Certification Required Prior to C.O. Upon completion of the drainage improvements, the Engineer-of-Record Mr. Scott Paling, P.E., shall provide to the City of Wheat Ridge a written, signed and sealed Drainage Certification Letter stating that the site grading was completed per the approved Grading & Erosion Control and Drainage Plans, all drainage facilities were constructed and shall function as defined in the approved Final Drainage Report/Plan, and that the site has been accurately surveyed to confirm that the grading and the construction of all drainage facilities was completed in accordance with these documents. The Drainage Certification Letter shall be submitted to the City for review and approval, and shall be accompanied with As-Built Plans for all constructed drainage facilities prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy. The As-Built Plans shall be submitted as follows: Two (2) copies of the "As-Built" Plans are to be submitted: a. 1 copy is to be on bond paper, and b. 1 copy is to be on electronic media (CD-ROM) and is to be in AutoCAD .dwg format. Please return all redlined plans with the next submittal. Applewood Baptist Expansion2006_ review] ltr.doc If you have any questions, please contact me at 303.235.2864. Sincerely, David F. Brossman, P.L.S. Development Review Engineer CC: Steve Nguyen, Engineering Manager Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner File Applewood Baptist Expansion2006_ reviewl Itr.doc City of Wheat Ridge Department of Public MEMORANDUM TO: Dave Brossman; Development Review Engineer FROM: Steve Nguyen, Engineering Manager'5~ DATE: Monday, June 07, 2006 SUBJECT: Applewood Baptist Church, 11200 W. 32nd Avenue, Traffic Impact Review #3 I have reviewed the revised traffic impact study, dated February 14, 2006, to the above site and have the following comments. 1. Please discuss the current and future traffic control for pedestrian activities on 32nd Avenue. It is our understanding that the pedestrian crossing is a major activity on 32nd Avenue. The recent submittal has provided some additional discussion on this. However, please expand the discussion on short and, long range detail plans to provide a standard traffic control in assisting the crossing pedestrians. The City felted that the pedestrian activity of the church use is significant and therefore it is important to convert to a standard type of traffic control to accommodate the pedestrian that conforms to driver expectation. This is a vital concern to the City since this activity is taking place in the City right-of-way. The fundamental question that needs to be addressed is would this pedestrian activity warrant a pedestrian signal in the near term or build out condition as outlined in the MUTCD? In the event that a signal is not warranted, what other consideration or design options to provide treatments that protect pedestrian and to effectively regulate safe speed at the crossing point under both day and night time conditions. The City conducted an observation on 11/03/04 where pedestrian crossing activity took place at night. It reveals that the lighting condition at the crosswalk is not ideal as it should be to maintain adequate visibility between vehicular traffic, pedestrians and the uniform traffic controller. 2. Please provide source or basis for the/2% annual growth on 32nd Avenue as indicated in the study. The 20-yr projected volumes for the north site are significant to warrant a right turn deceleration lane as per the City Code per section 26-620. Xce/ EnergysM PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY May 30, 2006 City of Wheat Ridge Community Development 7500 West 291h Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Attn: Meredith Reckert Siting and Land Rights 55015 1h Street, Suite 700 Denver, Colorado 80202-4256 Telephone: 303.571.7799 Facsimile: 303.571.7877 Re: Referral Response for Case No. MS-06-04, Applewood Baptist Church Subdivision Public Service Company of Colorado (PSCo) has no conflict with the above-mentioned referral. When planning to ensure that adequate utility easements are available within the above mentioned referral, PSCo requests that the following dedication language or plat note, be placed on the preliminary and final plats for the subdivision: Eight-foot (8) wide utility easements are hereby granted on private property adjacent to the front and rear lot lines of each single family lot in the subdivision. Ten-foot (10) wide utility easement are hereby granted on private property adjacent to the front and rear lot lines of each commercial/industrial lot in the subdivision. In addition, ten-foot (10) wide utility easements are hereby granted around the perimeter of platted areas including tracts, parcels and/or open space areas. These easements are reserved for the installation, maintenance, and replacement of electric, gas, television cable, and telecommunications facilities. Utilities shall also be permitted within any access easements and private streets in the subdivision. Permanent structures and water meters shall not be permitted within said utility easements. Public Service Company of Colorado (PSCo) has reviewed the future use for the above-mentioned referral. As a safety precaution and to prevent injury, PSCo would like to remind the applicant to contact PSCo's Engineering Department at 1-800-628-2121 (builder's call line) regarding new easements for gas and electric service, relocation and/or any grading activities on or near existing overhead and underground electric and gas facilities. As a courtesy reminder, please call the Utility Notification Center 1-800-922-1987 to have all underground utilities located prior to any digging. If you have any questions about this referral response, please contact me at (303) 571-7596. Thank You, h~~ Agent, Siting and Land Rights i i I ONSOLIDATED mutual water May 30, 2006 City of Wheat Ridge Meredith Reckert Community Development 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Re: City of Wheat Ridge Case Number MS-06-04/Appiewood Baptist Church, 11225 W. 32nd Avenue Dear Ms. Reckert: This will acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated May 23, 2006 regarding the above referenced property. Our, comments remain the same as in prior correspondence to the Community Development Department. We have no additional comments or changes for the above referenced project: If you should have any questions or comments regarding this correspondence, please contact this office. Sincerely, Michael E. Queen Executive President Me cc: Walter S. Welton, CMWCo President Mike J. Glade; CMWCo Vice President Operations and Engineering Greg M. Stroeder, CMWCo Water Distribution Manager John M. Allen, CMWCo Project Engineer Neal A. Santangelo, CMWCo Project Engineer THE CONSOLIDATED MUTUAL WATER COMPANY 12700 West 27th Avenue • EO. Box 150068 • Lakewood, Colorado 80215 _ Telephone (303)23&0451 • Fax (303)237-5560 - ~~~m r o m goma »~V RfJ C m - m m I!I III I o III ~II I III ~~I I lil III I H z ss~~ S - 5 p ~ z :4 a m o a N v v u ~ - < F D m o m z :E O m o Z u 0 o O o m r ~ E m D mm ~ o e to ~ 'x f~ C rn D ' D m m _ VX ! D o { O.LI\1C I n • -.Tam-.-- - r " le. VA LEY m BRO K `SU Y W €g M _ A D N I - ROLI T a J.] ry $ew l®E u Y~ SUBM GN O ° I O I e B A N Z H A F S U B. s°~ I = N ~sv e I I e. _ p APPLEWOOD KNDL 1211 IL Im QUAIL ST. QUAIL ev vu i~ ¢ e ~ 6~ I'g s - tl: ° , .i 9FWK OE IIMHXOl55 UIENOm . c RESUB. OF° E 2 d TR-2D BROOKSIDE I PI RSONST ,I" " e er s -L B ! ~ emmuie ar IX ~ q , E° = SUB. - q DEFFERT I € G) q 0 i'.". a - - _ ANIE S SUB. _I APP EWO D HI U8 . - v m~m - - ~ M ss - l 1 o PARFET a - Y _ ' r ST. JEFFERSON Y I ' BRgOKSI MA OR E BICKLEY' 2 GARDENS g x ° . ROOK$IDE f/) S SU T OW CONDDMI NAM - _ STATES ]I zI m p I°, ROLLING°'• a-Pef ' a I N< I:n - AI ; HILLS 3 < u -e------ v§ j - I - m = m e i "-j . _ c el a 'r: =i SUB _ O =8 L CD G m MARTIN /MARTIN /CONSULTING ENGINEERS May 22, 2006 City of Wheat Ridge Community Development 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Attn: Meredith Reckert 5-Z3-Oc Re: Community Development Referral - SUP-06-04/Applewood Baptist Church located at 11225 West 32nd Avenue Dear Ms. Reckert, On behalf of the Northwest Lakewood Sanitation District, Martin/Martin Inc. acting as the District Engineer, offers the following in response to the referenced Community Development Referral dated May 15, 2006: The existing building is currently provided with sanitary sewer service by the mainline within West 32nd Avenue along the south side of the property. • If the new building is separate from the existing building, the new building will require a separate sanitary sewer service line to the existing sanitary sewer main within West 32nd Avenue. The sanitary sewer service requires a cleanout be constructed 5 feet outside of the new building and every 100 feet of service length. The sanitary sewer service (private) will not require an easement. If the new building is in fact an addition to the existing building (expansion to the existing building), a separate sanitary sewer service is not required but may be necessary to facilitate building plumbing. • The owner is responsible for verifying sanitary sewer main elevations to determine if the development can be serviced with gravity flow or if a private sewage ejector is required. • The owner is responsible for construction and maintenance of the sanitary sewer service from building to main. • A grease trap will be required if a kitchen/cafeteria is incorporated within the new building. The Northwest Lakewood Sanitation District must review and approve construction plans that involve food service. • Owner shall provide sanitary sewer flow calculations to the District prior to final acceptance. • Appropriate development fees and tap fees based on the final design are the responsibility of the Developer (Owner). Please call our office if there are any questions, Sin Te ~ 111 Willis, P.E. District Engineer Cc: Special District Management Services - Lisa Johnson FAX: 303.987.2032 Collins, Cockrel and Cole - Tim Flynn FAX: 303.986.1755 12499 West Colfax • P.O. Box 151500 • Lakewood, Colorado 80215 • Telephone: 303-431-6100 • www.martinmartin.com Civil Department Fax: 303-431-4028 • Structural Department Fax: 303-431-6866 • Marketing Department Fax: 303-456-9923 ONSOLIDATED mutual water S-Z3 -D(o May 22, 2006 City of Wheat Ridge Meredith Reckert Community Development 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Re: City, of Wheat Ridge Case Number SUP-06-04/Appiewood Baptist Church, 11225 West 32nd Avenue Dear Ms. Reckert: This will acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated May 15, 2006 regarding the above referenced property. Please be advised that the above referenced property is in an area served by The Consolidated Mutual Water Company by virtue of a Distributor's Contract with Denver Water. Domestic water service 'may `be provided to this property subject to compliance with the Company's; rules, regulations and requirements for such service as well as the water tap allocation policies as established by Denver Water. Our records indicate that the property addressed as 11225 West 32"d Avenue is currently receiving domestic water from the Company through a 1-inch meter (CMWCo Tap Number 192751Account Number 1109200). Domestic water service may continue to be provided to this property subject to compliance with the Company's' rules, regulations and requirements for such service: The Company requires that a new application for water service be completed by the owner and returned to the Company at the time there is a change in use The Company considers a remodel or building addition as a "change of use. The Company's rules, regulations, and requirements further state that each separate structure be served by `a separate tap and meter, and in order to receive domestic water service, the, property must also front a Company main. THE CONSOLIDATED MUTUAL WATER COMPANY 12700 West 27th Avenue - P.O.Box 150068 - Lakewood, Colorado 80215 - - Telephone (303)238-0451 - Fax (303)237-5560 City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Ms. Meredith Reckert May 22, 2006 Page 2 of 2 Fire protection requirements should be obtained from Wheat Ridge Fire Protection District and those requirements forwarded to this office by the Fire District at the earliest possible time. We can then determine if additional system improvements would be required to meet the demands set forth by the Fire District. If you should have any questions or comments regarding this correspondence, please contact this office. Sincerely; r, Michael E. Queen Executive Vice President Me cc: Doug Saba, Wheat Ridge Fire Protection District Walter S. Welton, CMWCo President Mike J. Glade, CMWCo Vice President Operations and Engineering Greg M. Stroeder, CMWCo Water Distribution Manager John M. Allen, CMWCo Project Engineer Neal Santangelo; CMWCo Project Engineer I I i i Y o z O Q IL V/ ee :2 w N 0 i 'ensue ~ - IA ~ a w " I l Ld i i ASIIH S = 1£ a ~n Qz ¢ _ w WR >A q _ 3 a f a gn ~ a _,:33a a.ONI l OM's O I~ I _ % ~ 9 Q ~ 31V15 I F K N a' WOINIWOONW 3015NOOtl I ~ M EN308tl0 A3111018 du VW 3 ISNO NB NOS83333f '1S ~ ° =i i33add O N i ~ - ar.,~ • p o< ~ ' _ ° ' wen IH 0 OM3 ddtl I 0 ° n w l E 8f1S S 31 NV I z m " a I 3 O m € ens a33330 ' I z ~ h35 NOSl131d ~ z 301CY.OONB OZ=N1 N al ~ .30 'BnS38 e ° Q3pX3XO S3S10HXNW 30~Wtl8 R ~A 3 A ` z 1- I W 1E } e ° v 8 O a °O A • 3 nm 2e ~ s r i A e n 'JS lltlnt) k 1$ 'tVf10 w 6 I'll H Zl S IONN OOOM3lddV ° o a r= w I ~ A ° I $ e a € 3 R9~ I Y a ,s~ N I I o y'8 n s 3 V H Z N V 8 - Y 5 i Q O x I g NOISWOene is n R ° 301 -:e" R 3 s O w w e< R _ h o i~ ~ ~ e ~ noa_ . a " a m ¢ ° f1S 1I 0218 A3l tlA ~ I s s i I nR _ SWWIS .s EE~~ EE ~~a I III !!I I I I!j z I I jj I III II• i~i w w o z pX' a_ MARTIN /MARTIN _ CONSULTING ENGINEERS 4900 June 2, 2006 City of Wheat Ridge Community Development 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Attn: Meredith Reckert rn Re: Community Development Referral - MS-06-04/Applewood Baptist Church located at 11225 West 32nd Avenue Dear Ms. Reckert, On behalf of the Northwest Lakewood Sanitation District (NWLSD), Martin/Martin Inc. acting as the District Engineer, offers the following in response to the referenced Community Development Referral dated May 23, 2006: The NW LSD currently has a sanitary sewer main traversing the northerly side of the existing lot (within the northerly half of proposed Lot 2, Block 1). The proposed plat shows these easements are defined by 1) Bk 964, Pg 580 and 2) Bk 939, Pg 408. The District is requesting vacation of these existing easements and dedication of a new 20 foot wide sanitary sewer easement to encompass the existing sanitary sewer main from the westerly lot line to the easterly lot line of Lot 2, Block 1 of the Applewood Baptist Church Subdivision. The new easement shall be recorded on the plat and by a separate District Easement Agreement to be recorded at the County. The Easement Agreement shall allow for District ingress/egress to the 20-foot easement from West 32nd Avenue Right-of-Way frontage of Lot 1, Block 1 for maintenance and construction purposes. NWLSD will prepare the Easement Agreement and assist in developing the alignment of the 20-foot easement. In relation to service availability, please refer to the previous letter dated May 22, 2006 regarding SUP-06- 04/Applewood Baptist Church. Please call our office if there are any questions, Sincerely, " Bill Willis, P.E. District Engineer Cc: Special District Management Services - Lisa Johnson FAX: 303.987.2032 Collins, Cockrel and Cole - Tim Flynn FAX: 303.986.1755 12499 West Colfax • P.O. Box 151500 • Lakewood, Colorado 80215 • Telephone: 303-431-6100 • www.martinmartin.com Civil Department Fax: 303-431-4028 • Structural Department Fax: 303-431-6866 • Marketing Department Fax: 303-456-9923 City of Wheat f Department of May 30, 2006 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (303) 235-2861 7500 WEST 29T" AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 FAX (303) 235-2857 Mr. Gary D. Theander, P.E. Mountain States Engineering, Inc. 12860 W. Cedar Drive, Suite 102 Lakewood, CO 80228 Re: - First Review Comments of Preliminary Drainage Report/Plan, Preliminary Site Plan, and Traffic Impact Study received on May 15, 2006, and the Final Plat received on May 23, 2006. Dear Mr. Theander, I have completed the review of the above referenced documents for the Applewood Baptist Church Expansion Project located at 11225 W. 32°d Avenue, and have the following comments: Drainage Preliminary Drainage Report 1. The Historical Drainage section needs to include a description of the historical sub-basins, flow patterns, runoff rates, etc, 2. Compare the proposed (developed) runoff flows to the above-mentioned historical rates and patterns. 3. Include the following in the Detention Section: a. The provided detention volume as well as the minimum required volume. b. State the criteria used in determining the "adjusted maximum release rate". c. Identify the location of the emergency overflow weir and flow direction. 4. The runoff from Sub-basin B shall be directed into the proposed detention pond and not simply to the north. State in the Report that at such time as the area north of this proposed project is developed the runoff from this basin may be altered - but for the interim condition the runoff is to be routed into the detention pond. 5. All specific technical review comments will be made at the time of submittal of the Final Drainage Report. Preliminary Drainage 1. Please refer to the latest City of Wheat Ridge Site Drainage Requirements (Rev 4/06) found on the City website for current requirements, as some of the information in this Report is no longer valid, such as Table 3-1, and Figure 501, T-I-F curve (need to use Figure 5-1 for Wheat Ridge). Preliminary Drainage Plan 1. A swale from the proposed detention pond outlet will need to be graded to direct flows into the existing drainage ditch flowing into Lena Gulch. 2. The northeasterly portion of the site (due east of the proposed parking lot) appears that the proposed grading will substantially increase the slope and alter the existing flow pattern. This slope shall not exceed 3:1, and Public Works recommends that this slope not exceed 4:1 in order to establish ground cover and allow for proper maintenance. If a 4:1 slope cannot be met, an engineered retaining wall will be required. In addition, if the proposed grading in this area alters the historical drainage, some additions/modifications may be required for the final design. Applewood Bapdst Expmsioa2006_ revwwl.lt .doc 3. Extend the existing contours to 50' beyond the boundary of the subject property. 4. Both the detention pond outfall pipe/swale and the receiving drainage ditch which outfalls into Lena Gulch will require drainage easements (see Final Plat). Survevine Final Plat 1. The detention pond outfall pipe/swale and the receiving drainage ditch (the existing ditch) which outfalls into Lena Gulch will both require drainage easements (see redlined Plat). 2. The (existing) ditch easement needs to run from the easterly property line to the Lena Gulch easement boundary. 3. Upon the development and subdivision of the northerly parcel, the above-mentioned easements may be vacated or modified. 4. Include a Note stating "Tract A is a non-buildable tract reserved for stormwater detention, and that Tract A may be vacated/consolidated upon the development of and relocation of the detention facility to, Lot 2, Block 1, Applewood Baptist Church Subdivision". 5. Please remove the duplicate owner information in the Legal Description. 6. Need to correct all dates in signature and certification blocks. 7. Need to show all existing and proposed easements, including the standard 10' front and rear and 5' drainage and utility easements per City standards. 8. Correct the county Reception Number for the existing 10' drainage easement along the westerly side. Preliminary Site Plan 1. Show all existing and proposed easements per Final Plat. 2. Include a vicinity map. 3. Need to show the Legal Description per the Final Plat. 4. Show the floodplain. Traffic Engineering A copy of the Traffic Impact Study was forwarded to the Engineering Division Manager, Mr. Steve Nguyen, P.E., 303-235-2862 for review, and the following is his response: • Please see attached memo. The Public Works Department requires two signed and stamped copies of the Final Plat, Preliminary Drainage Report/Plan, Preliminary Site Plan, and Traffic Impact Study. Please provide these with the next submittal. Right-of-Way Construction Permit(s)/Licensing Prior to any construction within the public right-of-way, the necessary Right-of-Way Construction Permit(s) and respective licensing will need to be submitted for processing by the City. Right-of-Way Construction Permits are issued only after approval of all required technical documents, including but not limited to, the Final Drainage Report & Plan, Final Plat, Final Development Plan, Traffic Impact Study, Storm Sewer Plans, Street Construction Plans, Grading & Erosion Control Plan, Traffic Control Plan, and easement or ROW dedications. App1ewood Baptist Exp=sion2006_ nviewl.ltr.doc 2-Year Warranty Period for Public Improvements The Contractor shall warrant all work performed within the public right-of-way for a period of two (2) years, commencing upon completion of all constructed public improvements and Final Acceptance by the City Inspector. Prior to the expiration of said 2-year Warranty Period, if the City Inspector deems that the constructed public improvements are in such condition as to require repairs or replacement, the Contractor shall complete such repair work upon request per the City of Wheat Ridge Permit Testing and Inspection Requirements. NPDES Permit The Federal Clean Water Act implemented by the EPA requires that stormwater discharges from certain types of facilities as part National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) be authorized under stormwater discharge permits. Construction,sites greater than one (1) acre in size require an NPDES permit. The area of the proposed subdivision is greater than one acre and therefore shall comply with NPDES regulations. The NPDES permit for construction activities is issued by the State through the Colorado Discharge Permit System (CDPS), and may be obtained by contacting the Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment, Water Quality Control Division. A copy of the CDPS Permit is to be submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to issuance of the Major Grading/Landfill and Building Permits. Application for Minor Dumping/Landfill Permit Prior to the commencement of any onsite grading, an Application for Dumping/Landfill Permit, along with the fees due will need to be submitted for review and approval. This Permit is generally issued at the time of the Building Permit. Right-of-Way Construction Permit(s)/Licensing Prior to any construction of public improvements, utility service connections, etc. lying within the public right-of- way, the necessary Right-of-Way Construction Permit(s) and respective licensing will need to be submitted for processing by the City. Right-of-Way Construction Permits are issued only after approval of all required technical documents, including but not limited to, the Final Drainage Report & Plan, Final Plat, Final Development Plan, Traffic Impact Study, Storm Sewer Plans, Street Construction Plans, Grading & Erosion Control Plan, and any easement or ROW dedications. Drainage Certification Required Prior to C.O. Upon completion of the drainage improvements, the Engineer-of-Record Mr. Scott Paling, P.E., shall provide to the City of Wheat Ridge a written, signed and sealed Drainage Certification Letter stating that the site grading was completed per the approved Grading & Erosion Control and Drainage Plans, all drainage facilities were constructed and shall function as defined in the approved Final Drainage Report/Plan, and that the site has been accurately surveyed to confirm that the grading and the construction of all drainage facilities was completed in accordance with these documents. The Drainage Certification Letter shall be submitted to the City for review and approval, and shall be accompanied with As-Built Plans for all constructed drainage facilities prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy. The As-Built Plans shall be submitted as follows: Two (2) copies of the "As-Built" Plans are to be submitted: a. 1 copy is to be on bond paper, and b. 1 copy is to be on electronic media (CD-ROM) and is to be in AutoCAD.dwg format. Please return all redlined plans with the next submittal. Applewood Baptist Eapansion2006_ reviewl.lt AM If you have any questions, please contact me at 303.235.2864. Sincerely, David F. Brossman, P.L.S. Development Review Engineer CC: Steve Nguyen, Engineering Manager Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner File Applewood Baptist Enpansion2006_ reviewl ltr.doc City of Wheat Ridge Department of Public MEMORANDUM TO: Dave Brossman, Development Review Engineer FROM: Steve Nguyen, Engineering Manager9~ DATE: Monday, June 07, 2006 SUBJECT: Applewood Baptist Church, 11200 W. 32nd Avenue, Traffic Impact Review #3 I have reviewed the revised traffic impact study, dated February 14, 2006, to the above site and have the following comments. 1. Please discuss the current and future traffic control for pedestrian activities on 32°d Avenue. It is our understanding that the pedestrian crossing is a major activity on 32°d Avenue. The recent submittal has provided some additional discussion on this. However, please expand the discussion on short and long range detail plans to provide a standard traffic control in assisting the crossing pedestrians. The City felted that the pedestrian activity of the church use is significant and therefore it is important to convert to a standard type of traffic control to accommodate the pedestrian that conforms to driver expectation. This is avital concern to the City since this activity is taking place in the City right-of-way. The fundamental question that needs to be addressed is would this pedestrian activity warrant a pedestrian signal in the near term or build out condition as outlined in the MUTCD? In the event that a signal is not warranted, what other consideration or design options to provide treatments that protect pedestrian and to effectively regulate safe speed at the crossing point under both day and night time conditions. The City conducted an observation on 11/03/04 where pedestrian crossing activity took place at night. It reveals that the lighting condition at the crosswalk is not ideal as it should be to maintain adequate visibility between vehicular traffic, pedestrians and the uniform traffic controller. 2. Please provide source or basis for the V2 % annual growth on 32°d Avenue as indicated in the study. The 20-yr projected volumes for the north site are significant to warrant a right turn deceleration lane as per the City Code per section 26-620. 6-n THE CITY OF LAKEWOOD COMMUNITY PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT 480 SOUTH ALLISON PARKWAY LAKEW OOD, COLORADO 80226-3105 PHONE: 303 / 967-7982 / VOICE 303/987-7580/TDD FAx: 303/987-7979 June 21, 2006 Meredith Reckert Wheat Ridge Department of Planning & Development 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 RE: Lakewood Case # OR-06-011 and OR-06-013 Wheat Ridge Case # SUP-06-04 and MS-06-04 Applewood Baptist Church 11225 W. 32nd Avenue Dear Ms. Reckert, Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposal to expand and subdivide the existing building located at 11225 W. 32nd Avenue. The City of Lakewood staff offers the following comments for your consideration: 1. Tract A, the detention pond, is not explained on the subdivision cover sheet. Detention should be provided for on each lot. Detention ponds should not be allowed in the floodplain. 2. Create a Cross Access Easement for detention maintenance between the two proposed lots if only one detention pond is created. 3. Access to right-of-way should be required for all development parcels. 4. The original proposal and Traffic Study indicated that Robb Circle would be the access for this development. Robb Circle should be dedicated right-of- way and built to public standards with curb, gutter and detached sidewalk. It should directly align with Robb Circle to the south. 5. Please provide a revised Traffic Study to the City of Lakewood if access is to Quail Street. Staff would appreciate being notified on future development proposals for the property. Staff requests opposing and adjacent access points be shown on future submittals. This includes all site plans, rezoning applications, traffic studies, etc. Please contact me at 303-987-7527 or e-mail me at tindil@lakewood.orci if you have questions or concerns regarding the comments. Sincerely, ~vLCaJW~-~ Tina Dill Project Manager cc: Olga Mikhailova, Ben Mehmen, Shawn deJong, Toni S-urgeon, case file OR-06-001, OR-06-013 and File154-Dill Community Development 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 303.235.2846 Fax: 303.235.2857 The City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Referral Form Date: May 15, 2006 Response Due: May 29, 2006 The Wheat Ridge Community Development Department has received a request for approval of a special use permit with a site plan to allow expansion of a church in an R-1, Residential-One zone district on property located at 11225 W. 32nd Avenue. No response from you will constitute having no objections or concerns regarding this proposal. Case No.: SUP-06-04/Applewood Baptist Church Request: Approval of a special use permit with a site plan for expansion of a church in an R-1 zone district. The property is approximately 14.67 acres in size. The specific request is to allow for construction of a three-story education building with a footprint of 12,000 square feet. The extent of construction includes expansion of existing parking areas and relocation of an existing detention pond. It is anticipated that an application for approval of a subdivision plat will be submitted under separate cover. The subdivision case will have a separate referral process. Please respond to this request in writing regarding your ability to serve the property. Please specify any new infrastructure needed or improvements to existing infrastructure that will be required. Include any easements that will be essential to serve the property as a result of this development. Please detail the requirements for development in respect to your rules and regulations. If you need further clarification, contact the case manager. Case Manager: Meredith Reckert Voice: 303.235.2848 Fax: 303.235.2857 Email: mreckert@ci.wheatridge.co.us DISTRIBUTION: Water District (Consolidated Mutual) Sanitation District (Northwest Lakewood) Fire District (Wheat Ridge) Adjacent City (Lakewood) Jefferson County Planning Department Xcel Energy Qwest Communications Colorado Department of Transportation Denver Regional Council of Governments JeffCo Health Department JeffCo Schools JeffCo Commissioners AT&T Broadband Urban Drainage and Flood Control District Regional Transportation District Wheat Ridge Post Office Wheat Ridge Police Department Wheat Ridge Public Works Wheat Ridge Parks & Recreation Department Wheat Ridge Economic Development Wheat Ridge Building Division Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority "The Carnation City" 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 303/235-2846 Fax: 303/235-2857 May 9, 2006 Stanley Pouw Pouw & Associates 190 East 9`h Avenue Suite 250 Denver, CO 80203 Dear Mr. Pouw: The City of Wheat Ridge (~oF WHEATRO i m cOtoRp~o This letter is in regard to your application for approval of a special use permit for expansion of the Applewood Baptist Church campus at 11200 W. 32nd Avenue. Another required component of the request was to be a final plat document. This document is required to consolidate the existing three church-owned parcels, to separate the church parcel from the rear portion to be developed by others, to dedicate shared detention and access easements and for dedication of any needed right-of-way. The application submitted acknowledges only the special use application. No plat documents were included in the submittal. The fee paid covers the costs of both land use approvals. Please advise me as to how you would like to proceed. I can be reached at 303-235-2848 Sincerely, Meredith Reckert, AICP c: Applewood Baptist church i WHEAT~C m c~~ORp~~ 7500 W. 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Wheat Ridge Planning Department 303-235-2846 NOTICE TO MINERAL ESTATE OWNERS APPLICANTS: You must submit this completed form to the Community Development Department no later than ten (10) days before the public hearing on your application. Failure to complete and submit this Certification of Notice shall constitute sufficient grounds to reschedule your public hearing. I, as of/with (Print name) (Position Job Title) (Entity applying for permit/approval) (hereinafter, the "Applicant"), do hereby certify that notice of the application for set for public hearing on (describe type of application) 2001 has been sent to all mineral estate owners at least thirty (30) days before the public hearing, as required by § 24-65.5-103(1), C.R.S., or, in the alternative, that the records of the Jefferson County Clerk and Recorder do not identify any mineral estate owners of any portion of the property subject to the above referenced application. heck here if there are no mineral estate owners of any portion of the subject property. I hereby further certify that I am authorized by the Applicant to make representations contained herein and act as the Applicant's agent for purposes of this Certificate of Notice and bind the Applicant to these representations by my signature below. Dated this oZ day of M~ , 200_4 By: INhNt1Y//k,GD !0073 Case No.: App: Last Name: App: First Name: Owner: Last Name: Owner: First Name: App Address: City, State Zip: App: Phone: Owner Address: City/State/Zip: Owner Phone: Project Address: Street Name: City/State, Zip: Case Disposition: Project Planner: File Location: Notes: Follow-Up: SUP0604 Quarter Section Map No.: NW28 pplewood Baptist Church Related Cases: MS0607. c/o Stanley Pouw Case History: SUP to allow an ducat, onal facility on PP lewood Baptist residentially zoned property I . 190 E. 9th Ave., #250 Review Body: dm. Denver, CO 80203 303.296.4343 APN. 39-282.05.064 11200 W. 32nd Ave. 2nd Review Body: heat Ridge, CO 80033 2nd Review Date: 303-232-9575 Decision-making Body: 11225 Approval/Denial Date: est 32nd Avenue heat Ridge, CO 80033 Reso/Ordinance No.: Conditions of Approval: District: III Reckert ctive Date Received: 514/2006 Pre-App Date: /29/2005. r _37 LLIN ~M5 FIE: P. TV- D F WHEgT LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION 4a m Community Development Department 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Phone (303) 235-2846 00 co t O R p (Please print or type all information) Applicant PpULU flr}~SSOGIwCrs: 4-yIC~ Address IQ0 t4:1;+C1f6 A-M #2S0 Phone 303-746b-4.3¢3 City Deh (bm^ State eso zip, 802203 Fax_JG "ZG6-QI12 Address 41.E w.32M4 Phone ?03 23 M 575 Owner &Rfeuwet City _-_--W ~ _ State Zip Fax 0 - _25 ~ pp Contact 314mi i/ i~l((1l Address (010 F440AW-l.#'= Phone 0 . 3 City-pg,ylU2lr State Colorado Zip R~`~3 Fax U (The person listed as contact will be contacted to answer questions regarding this application, provide additional information when necessary, post public hearing signs, will receive a copy of the staff report prior to Public Hearing, and shall be responsible for forwarding all verbal and written communication to applicant and owner.) Location of request (address): ( 22 32 hd W 80033 Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request): Application submittal requirements on reverse side ❑ Change of zone or zone conditions ;9 Special Use Permit ❑ Consolidation Plat ❑ Subdivision: Minor (5 lots or less) ❑ Flood Plain Special Exception ❑ Subdivision: Major (More than 5 lots) ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Right of Way Vacation ❑ Planned Building Group ❑ Temporary Use, Building, Sign ❑ Site Development Plan approval ❑ Variance/Waiver (from Section ) ❑ Other: Detailed description of request: 3S (ri IM o ~ 7~ (7 uA fcQ.tAncl Required information: Assessors Parcel Number: Size of Lot (acres or square footage): Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning: Current Use: Ll~lG1 ikYY Proposed Use:__Uffdi I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above, without whose consent the requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners must submit power-of-attor ey the owne which approved of this action on his behalf. Signature of Appplicant ubs bed ~ikd sworn to me this --4 day of fj ( 2o o& nn pp Gyr~ No y Public My commission expires g~a~ fa0~ 8 To be filled out by staff: d 1 5zl o F D t i $ e a e rece ve ee ceip No. Case No. 'omp Plan Desig. Zoning - Quarter Section Ma 'ated Case No. Pre-App Mtg. Date O Case Manager 'To M nTS5.l~~. 'R~'.... I...lf l 35 FL R-1 A 6 PDZ ti ~ ■ N A 0 200 400 Feet LLW-M .MENEEMEN LAKEW OOD 33 L a R-1 VE O. U) 0 ■ ■ PROPERTY LOCATION 100 Year Floodplain (approximate location) 0 O L1 c .+esmwd~*m Y; O. on oroow•* mM~mwmDq~ bm(n dby ,ymmm yO'n ro e o m -m w o by 7 Oro G °~~Go.n ok Hp*O!?o Mm Nw~Nw°~ nmaam w.m+y o wN^6n Him-.'OI m C. a'* c m ° `G ry M C w no o y fH., G c0 y m o to H d N ~I wrom°'w mmm o y <~~w ~,3.WYydprooCmH~m 7o mwm H ~mm nOOJ 5, `C G Oro G d m G7m o m m C7 o H O N 9 b -r m H _y Ip C H n GR o Lw w e< ry H w m H y "O•m "ti O O ,y IY_, C ^S' I Ry O' `C H M w .y. m G w m - m cl. d ~ro d p; n w y by O"'Y: O m mow, Hadoy M° O myn `.f o 00 N 7y M O O" 'z O w". w ''2'' ~p M O O uP H 6ID (D Z- ° rmy .N Imo. o Yti d i m- ro m =w ~~~mroa P. m O0 O•y~H ImD IYJd LV1 '°J' 'm'm Gm SH D'q.G•my MV- ~m mmw m m M~~cn~ °Da ti we,. Gmo "m --yyyy o5° ~y n r• to rn. '>•t ° w t, mi Y• y. C ~p m G0- aN.m M G w n w N c1 .C. a °.R~'~ •m O a, n crO m r G°'~ why .'7 C"' t" N O mH•W Hi.'~-y W~ C m 5 y N Mw m'Cm '."d Gmwm oy'...;D ymmoiPayw SroH o Mmw MGM' .w 0 'O ~y~'~" m-, C'7 m n m m Z 9 ~ e+. V ~ N •.F. Kl O LI r O W a m m 'Oy `Y' y m Cmi d o m m y M m n 'g, H d w. w .H-. w O m m MONO, W lt- 1'{ R to m H y g 'J (D t'1 0 m (D N w H ka~'o °.m '.."m c+n 6'wGO OY m m'd 5'mronc*d~m wnd rHi~G do _ 'a• r%m m H mm'"l'c~G,yy nP..° n h~° 5',M, m mo m ~.~...m m H m 9 4 (D w y LTJ R m w 'a• m Mro F C yY'r.M...-i-. O'm O w W m w GC y G LL n e+a• O er 'IS ,h N y 7, Y. O. 0 0 O m /y ml-Ipm°~mp HH ME pymy.-w oymy".':m~~o ~m°H Onmm,mMG~a•o~~l7rtn 9C" biH w 0m t°yZm t7m fD o nm 9 h' m Mo m ~n rn m 7 o' m y N w a H _ y m o o 16 o w m °c m =v w-" H" am+ f"m m "j C 10 0 Id O D y DV ray - _ 2 C•1 n- m w M< ro I tl ~.7 hym w W o' m "ro mwm~ m Mo M m O,.nw.a-,t '".e no do GG m ...y w no O'ne 1 O rt'C° t+ y O n ~ H C ~ Uy x O O (D O [-l ~'+mwHr(y"m m,my d(p OqW wHymmmm ormn~ MyN NYy mm m. 7rt x£ Gy am ID x--9C H Cd(y r~ny [1 o m° "m H w y' ❑ G y n `S w 5• m m ...e4 m H W m F e+ y m m m° O m fD `C E H (n NY' M d H H ~;I_ F+ C.'Z Y• m r, (D C N U9 ^e w My Y' y,d y... d n.GOm` yom Hroydro . dw ° M,bm < O O H w 7 w m I--C'. x, rt m M(D d ^ O n o o H- o O rt C7 o q H ',b m th - o O HmmmM ,Y em. O• m.m...C m r'a•w O-L.o m y p,mymn m...ymmums00 g- ooMHC m°om`Cd ! G I'd P. e' ,dmHC Hy n a m No °omn...~mml°no ~~m why 'GHO 7.d 9 rn 0 t+11-~ o p,wmmw~: ,ms O. C7 m0`J•n yW O N ww MO~~'•YO°mdy m~M~y~Ce mH."~ ~w'c"4 ~+H a•om M' m cf 'b M C y M O 6~' y m0O.-.Cm..o H'G y nw_ of c..~.'O ow GyR'y m7m H5.a•O o' mx,y e.m HC-Ij r H nm ~ro ~b -~'irl rt H I O.m y trroJ Pd I.J 0 (D 0WGyn'.1p m~ Gwyd~m~dr~m~.o o Id .....+m my~.GymmwGMi C) N o.-.aH0m t?H (-CC/]'71 ro I%j ~.y d0~-3 d H m o, m a• H e+ Cf 0 rmn ° Oa H no m H G m 'S' N y G R (D I"h t, n ~y. N 0 omm y m ,wH mn o.°m w°4Omm m m m °~ma. ,0 S m po p ~ N m t" W O rt m o y o y H r• ~ b CO 0 ,a d'Y~'S°p GGGyn H~mW womrooyHmYjNB,mf m (D : 0. y.0 H rt o M zy H. a0- ~T'ro o o P' m~ pyq Y' C-. y Mhy y o o m M "t y D°9 to ❑ CO .'C H o 0 0. to y 1.4 m. O T H H O y (D G P3 n mom a a0 my wuq rt n m pGUq n'mm w•a I°.,m ` F.H~yoow i"Do°m P,m H O MHmq~.m y .H"• m V n N q 0' w = m a: o C7 m W 3 LA m o H. C ~°mW wmymaoxwGwoNmE? mmam~CnMn.ooH rtr zOzF wpm 0 C~ h y H o 9 mY0 a o~omwHN Dy90 .H Cn wMHymr'4 mH yw ny,G,y'4C~yb C5 K mm H C7~ d• by N 3. ;qS H b n - n r Ma Ohyp M G W rt m m m m, O H o O O m o rom an ' womm wp n Cm'm fn Mrym. m n W mmm`< H~ m m ,...H mb'v'.'1dp g (D; Y m H Al"!-+.,m L'C y H o HH F+ m- N HHw mmN G Ha-r G<H y' o mw 0 E~:° Om d. w m ? (D; cr on ro MGO-mym m mOwpmroo no I m m Hom on M (D H C'. ~~i..v ° co 0 9) Q 9 C" m 5 n lr Y m H p, t; R• H O .••'a m m m H m ` H O w O', : 9 y OH O-on Cf y mdHn m_.+. Cyma„y• e!`y'. e'r O G o NG y ro O m y m oo o N N O R7 G `4 cwi n a ro° `,p' m y m m O w H p m m m H' m II, y a. M Gro o• a p' w tT . H NY'" d o n C .O W O 4 0 0 0 n ' w d n. GD O b y o N d b O m w N CD n '.ro Ho" ',O d d y- o H m G w" m m 5' m H, y d a e4 d w . O' ^ w m •4 w m H a y m ?•O dagm~ u 'w' w •wymy w wa.w wm yy'm e'nHH w° 0y•< n .m G'...H d pmw n, a' O M o O "'t syy C [ w x o 0 MwH °'.y w DHq a, P•gd'mmy'nnm y MO o mma•r. M ro O4 p; D9 m H w m m o 5' by M d w° m m O" o ,pew go, z w .1 m` m ~ w_ o N~ rt H m H m cr vO O.. r w a• H t{ C H cH nn,m. ,C ry wm n. m''.~.ow amwmq yP• mmm M r..w n O rt M _G _.y-,- M m W W ~ ° w m 0. rt m~.w n,N w yCwG *.m:rm5HG~domH•+m'C oy a n o7dwwo.C ° a' W W o ro p..m Z Do M m p 0 `C w~rmn `C omq n cyi q.w Soo -m G.m~-a'm maV ~.°cmr'a m. awn H, ydp.Hm WmW ym O N (D 0•. !7 w ,y µ • yz < N 7 ° O yH-rw SH hyyD9Gm~o ma+m.-. m'.a'~Cyiim~"~m•~ Y~ RYhy mwm Ym'4mm 0 rt GO?M H? JIC.. w~,'. Y-m m iom Mq 1yI!~ /S. o O a n ,..awKwm'o pq mbG.m°n. hymG,°y-wHYGCw .iD9d .+.~mHr.n0m°H ° o O N M c+ m O 6-0 2, myy~'CV•HN'G y•m O,Ym HHnG°.C.-H•DQ Mw CAa' mm.Y°romwmj'm I'l'r~ N N ~•~m " I`r"1. Y l cw+ H Gro 2 7 G o Y Hm,.'mm Gm am Cm o,.4 n 'n M q tl y e m r. ° r y~ v~ n a m rt " y 'O H I OO: JD 1 O 00 o° o,wy P° m 0 o n•... y 5' n. n m g m m y w m 0 W o p m t O n y'cHi .+.na a• ywm- GG..wmmm amy dm'd Om DgmmHNo w o. 'i m u, M• 1 NwN oMy S• H °a N Hmn m GtoH w.°+. P.y wKmm 7 Mo dbO ~.mon e. w"om„ a m m w ¢ p 1 <o d mm (pM w o y .T'H~ omhy m O'y aN,"-y o.+m MM m,<-" C. fD Y wt"~.~.`..m am o m rt ya m G rt ,y o' 4? ( 8 O _Dq M W O m H Mm :'m ..m MCH e< c n !D to w c"'dp ° a mMM.'.~ m :JD - m (D 1~: womb ' n. P. aqm mOmae'm 0'CO m"d°1ym m,O ° Mft ndx. y we a~ mp w tt SD o C n H m d M fy H N t] w y a m w d- O p, 0 rd O O n C n- t] w v M ."'n m d n Mro H+ Q eGY M 5 0 fD w o rte' e a jM , `m. O t SOS O wm ,y O G O o w oy.m Gam C.,- wma•o.O a+ ,;Y C~ t; d~ Gea w Fmm o .T'. m M u Vt~ ~L 0-w v °i 2,40em- p m y,j~mdH}m mDgH ma rohy Omn, lY .n N dOOn ywy.. 7_w 0 0 O - t7 D90'0 ro mH m Comm O.MC`,-`P.~l~ O mm FOmw•.,.~ mm.' O 5'm~c y' ow'°' o H. '°i:r a.~313 U310 AIR a ~m.»w b mG am o. H m ro- a•wo y m C I ~ o o.a o ° m ~ 5• n i° m . d 3?,J~ y..H.YHw y nm y..mwro .GO d.rm~..Hmm 'd w m0 H' o(Ig M 0 o m y O 1 m~ ft :II7 70 m`C O:+Fw tn+ W°p'HSC `C dOyro wom.Hi-6'm m eoM m 7 ~I-n .+mm :o m ro 0.0 V~ r• 97L O a oyH m w C., c+C M d m M MG 0 5'M"" nm p, H'<yf".d:r m.r a.n _r m OC O Eli mRy y"' o ° `G 'J Nm m OW mb H W Fla H H c,. m .C OdyMa dNaw mO. G. vi~M cf y..m M .R m -7 (DD) -1 M ll O` N 0- "i tr' y G. o a o .i m m .m-. N o a o m m y a• o ° m m.0 n a' P. o m .jf m ti ,p, j„( q. e~c+woGdw 7 °ye~aGC mH m'4 ~`v nwm s'n.~.. Y'y a °ym H_ m o m °m Cl .mTrt.. m z'C H.n m:C C oro H I°-l gym m.H am , Wy w ym m m ow w [Y'Jo < My - m o I ro rte. m H o a m d m G y' Mry w o a w - y i C w: v, pro ~ryii GC w ° omm 5' roam8ma y.d5'y Mmm ymy' MmmGn 'y n.o a~H Mro M ❑ d Gi m wao a pmceHm=m,°yg m° mG.wwoa w oa^m F~ H~ w m H ~~e° a~ N0301=at;!.rINIG3ll3 m o H m H o m x ro a m° m ° G c° ro y m v' a• ^ m d a y o Y o a H' . o d m o m o ° O MO 10 AO 31V1S m MrsH m H o m y.. 5-. wy. 5-. `4 m m m m 7 G p.d a a`a 5 O'm'G .M _'C_, M G I H HOS833331, 30 AINPTOO x l~a O tZI Id n n m o ro y d z o WI . I iP X Imj Gl ~ W. w m mo G+: H H . ca 9 a m ; N 4~ Vl C o .a c an a~ ~ a2 No.......... - DEED OF TRUST w ~ FROM ° w o z o k . . .MM. b w m ......_........_............................a . corporation. m TO m c THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE FOR THE USE OF F j Jf M ~ ~ b a STATE OF COLORADO, 1J7 ~~';'am Cmy of i.. ~ I hereby certify that this instrument was filed +i for record in my office at ..............................o'clock M., 19.......... and is duly recorded in book . i page lm No Reception No.. ~ A w' Recor erg 1 ~ M Fees, $ BgAOFOPO PYBLISNINO 00., OENVEq c O P H 7 0. ~ 2 z zn M ro ,l •4 O t',f1 A~1J To r q tj iv m •w o O H Oo {s] lC m G ' Ht P o C to .Ft qqo. F9 ;rt iP err O iW N. r0 in ca C : N ^"7 iH ivy iFh a. N it n iH iW T b N i iC m - 'Q oN O i Fi rt ~.m w 1 n .me ° a':N i cmi p w: o 9 ab :o.dp a i Y o w O•CGo `N x w •n a;rt b Cy G, m n Y• - _ - yC ooYp 5'ro°~' H O 'C v~ a+m dy m m rn ,w F. .°r ° E ` m M'- ,1~ i~aas.arr~ H ~'C ZG n G q' M<a \v\v N a.~,y v,,G,S ° wd ~lo00M^a V~ WG y m ~d5 G..n. .O .N m \\~l] m 1'tl Q~.^m Fob H G C `q H]y m y Go 5 ~H,m o m m,m C C 1 ~.m~ j y e7'I y w N O E', V dO °•a'0 to f~J to m m G m~m~twq "C•C5 w H Cm d0 5•m d a 01 - o mm ~p mm i VJ H50 Gm.Ci ~ Ymm~nl mwm wb'~'yv i daN Ew ro 'mw t ° n ro :O £ n w 1 P:e 1 0 :H O to w m 0 :w o mm 0 : m m R'd La, uo O Q+ d dC N oro M 9 M 1.0 n w G n .O I'tl Y mm1w mom 0 VV ON . 0 [n m 'o w? m w 0 :w 'n xn o a.Gw r n o m n m 5. to i0 C a' C 0 Nn :k7 .'o a y Mo =m m j n mwy"m5d w 0 ° m tim M - Vl ° moG Cy :3 E n ~ ven ~.m,e rt Sd: m mm m ° n •ak; p G 7 M E. N N O P. 0. Box 5773 Denver, Colorado 802217 dro e~^mmHW"'W pM ~M•y ,wJ. ~W ytPJn -y 5~ E.~ IYG~ -ol O r0.-In.'3 dOef r<+.H d !17 do. m'• ~J'S m _ 'N„n om 9.`n-:'roy°oy`~5ow HCem9,°a• N m b0 'c < 6 z o p o rr M e o n y m z ° m y o o G 7 o m ry 7•G M •y.y Y.;•rNN mcrG Oln Mpw O d G° b°Y 0.- H °.T mwd~ H~"m'~m7 yG '3"C'C M: N y 7~mO ~~.u7n ri m• y ti m m m mC•C' m... .•o m ym CYro itio "ro ut~m w.r+dG~ eC w' Ym,m .w. ,7, O' ~C nw p,m O° m N T1 N w C O H 0.(J F' G 'y N O y n, m~ M m M -0. y C." I tl'• M y 7 p m H n y N N Y • In m d m 0' m' 5o0 on`G'Gm~m$'OO 0-- roC~.h'0,'H 70 C. wG no yyH~'am .+m~w y'o e.e.rm.+n o'~w Gn my~. mm m5°wNq~ . w GH m o ~ m " V ~m o 0."51mm`rNO m~P. myS n.mN Cne<Ha m m G h. FwbM et C'm Fy m.C VN•o ~D R5o WN ,>','~Q o° nr m:ik n.'*F°bMwhy '-'trAY ~'~'m'tl7nma•V'.~p'c1mmO ~~M0 mew m`~G Wm~i-n cN'i.m r w G m,C m m m•~ o mm n o "jm 7 h] o C'H cki o p. o Mm P H I°6. et b m ` m k 00 ,G.+, .Y .O °Gro °i-n'7, 'v p• m 7 mm m H m eY C'C O y N ,n pi ° m N O y k O M tHG ~ m r n eror w O " m N by m v. p 7 `<rd ,~~,~r. p, wmCrCw ,:b,.w w0 C CC m "wpp ,~H m tl ~.°-.o °•p Vd'°'• S'G.e M 6.17 ~-.s ~ e'G. 0 H Mn7'n 'G ek7 ~y-. o•~n m M m y7 ~ .~+-"~~.m="~PH+y 7<i°n~o y7 mi+m e'K. ON 'Y x'°09 Amer ,yCm m C M o'C .C m 7 .m dm m M~ m w 0 Mm m m 5° 9r'.r.O roo M^ Om ~ 0 0000m 4'r m C ° m m'°r m o'C' m toC=-N 0 -,m.,4pmz'o ,y ~mm row Kn m~5 rom° mn .gym On 0 a+.'r1 (o cry M° o w y N yy G IY 0 .0° e m o o 7 dm m F°i, W 5'Ge maq dm,o w xr ~H `Y'om-' y x5 m o m 5 m o C ~.°p c x° iY "ym?mmy w.Nmyo.°., gmrt mN mcb wwR womc~I~~ °'MmG m m'y 7MOOm nm mbaym Gro ~i w7 'on 7 an d m o .Yr.H ciw° o, m w.m m w'C m M m a H' m 7 d 'S a o -r4N - 5 5~ m . d y d 0 5 w o w y m m rC y 7mowm - m noop' mp: r7 n p-0 w5. .4 ° 2 - ~"5mm Om nroo Gym.+w N °<wK+mym m°'e y7'o ro b ym0, 5n `06m 'o °'mmy om~ o,~ ~a'P. r.o o- b w y m K F C° Mm y o K o w H MarO, w F°'d m-< Mo°~ p'0 O G .JN ay r°Nn O' 0 y H NC w~ ee*m 5M Z'm M 5 5-P= FyZm. tir w. tim K''0 0 o H,m aV_p° i~n,ym pQ 5P.2 -Y~ ° mo o mom- H'<`^G'r mwM w.H iy wn 7p•< .'C .k 014 o' GM y nw G.mr' m n Cm .Y C•° o G' n m G'•n o ma7+mmm yto ~ moo1'~bm:"r~~,'b~b,m,•=n 0" ~o ~0°9'~, Inc o°oPt:--9, w h GC a.8 n H S o d` m m w m m C .0 qj w e..Y p,µe,. y°, w nro G'.Y,3..o'°C m rwn'C 0 1n,00'7m "7ro MS.m X10 m noromr7•m y'me Chye0 y C pH ,Cy° loP w7mma'0y °Hm P H~plK n dy' ON :po.O M o='oM° yoo 0pwF°e mm6 7r0m H n m •C 28I a Hw W mCn .wmmH m m° n m w nm 'CO .+~..w m...w N•~ K a5q r.'4~Omq o m m z 5,;.p,wo a•m m""-. 'x1d n~H 'r 7w 1°-b~y 0m oowGy~ol°-n e. `gym m0x moo' ~.7 m° ~e7 P0y O' w°y ?+m moo~Mwm m~rommm °c'o Hm mr°+. m0' d0mw ° w ro Q~Y•"a7q '."r 6... ° 0m~y m° M 7 o m 5 ❑ m y vi •Yn o 0 y C G' M 700 m 7G.~.C°mm ON MH~M~~ ~yw o °.m-:M Qm NV to Ory p,no, mH.CAa •rY.TJO ~.0 HH'"J_ '100 NN.'1 0.O 7 W M I A mMm '4 GW 0~' q'y C N y7 w TA 0•m w. mn p 7 m e~ 0 m r. m -P wS' 1 m C `C 7- 0 Ei m aq.- m m° P y a m 00 :1 vo~ °0 o'o0Z Noo'me~'., A. o 5.°70 X0;07 w.~'d mro ~w d ,my 0 do H.~mno ~'myn2f ci ~Kd M mo 00 ,<H 7w rmi, q' Q ro ,y o w Fmj VH m m .°A'o cP w 'rm'' M n'"' o a P. m m b ~ 'HT n M mw .Hw Gw Rr.w Gwm 0 w0 mm Wwe•ef eT Hmm ro• to o M C to 07 w my w lay ,45 Ls' R'6' mp H mf mM Gc~ Md,m a .aa~~a d. Ham mm dG•i ..w 1000 3c~ Ajj_ t~-`a X003.3 M 0 1 n dw 0;C c m G 00 a~d r, m y w n ' N.Ty Mew, w xm,Y ° y G•ro },N dm K m m ! f O O m R7M .~Sq;dV 5 w w p m 75 'y :"n O,m o.. • m O X0"-•.`"'m (D Mb ~ 'Uy°m~M Frt,•SmmH° omy •r' pw 5m m m ° 0 Mw 0 M mo jw mom w r n d o xeggq G`^o m d °Ec.m m Y q' m d m, 6:m °aa 7 7 ro dYN 'e m~ o m H :O-y m 'C .C-. rr 7 rrm wpm y Me*m m 0 m y m 7 w w G ,C m ae+Cg9 m o w m m W •mf N vi 7 0 s"~m m m•w Gp ~y yd m w, N Zv' Qi ~ o p~ a V v n n d O m H N' 1 m d' S .o ~A ~ I n^^I i W O m m o ?',Yro an d M Oy CR1O OFn'p o w 5: a'?.+m M>+-w N m.m..dCDq b H~ d b' m P m ow m ~P' v a.p b°m aOmX y ° :G.o Y'wmw°m:`°1 ..'mY yp O ma-. O w mW Mp m:° P i. 4 ° w2imdmmNm ,°y H <<*~m~o'D~ P.p 0a °~'o ,gy MdO mGO"y'er H a ~'d. ro (D d nrhy M M O H `GYO'om m .c mX p mmrodp'on o mm C7~". o Mmmma`m wm ,H.dpyO m.. pEG; tn mww oa.'o M o o°yp Mo m 0 O hr-' ~j -~Mm O O•m In OTJaamNp'C ...`Cmm dC.omm m<i D4 p,m MO,MM MOw~m °r.<. •,no m 0 n- (D mC .+N Np mm o m o 0n<'EMm bO~p ~mpw GC p "mo m `TSj'm.•my opo p x+ r7 < mmda aH MC °y~ Yy 70~0o n o m d°m°mro 7 C N ;J* l'7 ht 7 w H O Dq ~ p 1-3 0- m m'< p G O w N o p'...d° r p o m p m p' O m k oN`.ym°~' LO,f d n°mm °Mmn roro a+w .m~mn G~.nN Nro'p. r~Hmmo Oq [sJ H~ W y d y rx ro p 10 ~mm`°wm~+ mmyi°-na yr'•w ~~w '+`°ome Yo p,5-~ mmo nSD.mmd O° Y 9 a a h p~ Ga•m o G,wmm `°aeNa°c~n a•,yo o ro mmm. c,y~m KGp - z r. -R o, t1J p t M Hp ko CmIn Mom Gp~y'tlN Opm mr mm°~ .<mH p wiwm°'dD9 O'"5- Hd KC7- at" CoH w hJ° ~ ~wcmr~mw h'N Mm M~yymaN'*~°Np%mG.Nm,Nmy ~On O•``y prop ~`<nw ~°mH~y.O ~nyyO 7 Grort., .i C.-'N ay+W~O`iU- ~HmwKro °8 w m KP~ogmyKymmmm~om~ypo <pN m° G M°pp rt d D n O 7 p P 09 ppr.R dN O'y .-'a.od mmN .,m ~:',~C•°.~•e z ~'rt ,k'1 X. m o m F°.yN a.•K'HdM dm Y:oO~K.. ~DH4~y w°hi y'<CHm rn aw`°°n MbmaO (D `C L-r T/J "r w,s w ' N,-.HN m rp„ y m i~0-n"hJ G d° dm C m m~° m.~--'d m O m n E m° w r.~ m C H. O O rT C7 O w M N m P' w pm,N my Gym `~'O•bmo'o ~wnom%R,m m?'M=-'cmrvw H'oo mmo m°'`Cb~m<r-mmo° Sd .O,M dO b7M o no P. o n nCMro ~wroOGmK0 m mMp.Yp P.. Ow y•'C H:L4 r y MM ~ro M n oo--N o `C..mpm -Pao M~ p pNp•n, H o'o y'5' m xpc' m m O 0 o q omG~O m ~°r'. P..mf~awm`C Dqy m o ~-,m <M ~ mro„aOmw MOgmy.m~.dm°mw -NOoproy° mro0 °cmFrom mp D M n ° yO w b o n.-'?'e.w.~m * m m Cp 3 p `G y H w m w w (D oI p o O w p .p n o y w m'C o m m o n `m N ~w w w -.a p• C'< Uy rt 4. ° ro11 1 ° Gp K~7Ny P. m. G'N O'.n.ENMw oCrtln wyirmE w.'p `<7p .ww..°opM d~nPr ~ N v 0 N ° m M m p .a'p'p'.... m y p mC Ci;H yo GH nom'oo ,xm" eG M wn~mewr m y~'~ w p G 4 aoH PH m o rf O n r m°a.mpm ° w~'y ~•o dmo~p omomnm Q,°,Mmow mm° 'C ny°mn n m N T>' ° d m m ❑ ~G Vni ° E q m p.~w „N w m G CO ° G ° r°i, rmy w p .m w N CD N - O m' p P' r' N H m E m a m `L m G O m Y O v p' ° O 'C N LC D4 G° m Oq m o ro y a~.`G m o o p• y'3 m 1 d es H n r ON ° ~...o o K rT 'G' d e mM m pw p n6'N C Cp N pmy m nOMHZP- M Q C-y C7 rt m y' b romm'<dK m m,m^„y rrm mm a~~o~~°mmm Omwm ;'y~ryom,°j m d d'r* (D y w HHmm.Om n Rf Mdo mN GOw^R'C Omn nHn dNOn im-n (D (D "+j (D y V O p n n a' v+ d n O n d'o G o m b m Mh]Om'C Wm m ° mNmw C Om,~Gm~:dmye'M 'mmo am C~o.ddw~ompR. m DI M H OL o n. O ,ZIP .wr 'o Z o n momma p mnyb .Y P.~ HE'S p... .ryy wo•y mmm. m '.17. - b m ° m 0 dpq O y W. y w N" w M m m" p' P" c G d o o m O 6M I w 0- m- lq I p• d C'] GD O G w m MwHOm•w~ w Dn4 p''o a?' aN mtm~m~m7'.mH'~wro p°,.c e° wvw m`'m wno m rt IO-` M W D9 ymyytom m p mmo n_y H ~yo Hy d m.*° WH mdC W m e_ w p o 0 13 p'°p'a'~.owm"".~ Ommwyd' a0 tl1 m .s m m w G w p' (o E roo m m m ,C m b o q° O. p w o m O'- N N berm `°pm Nm ° .p-r p np.~^`>-'C .^..dm mG ~o.,-pmy w, M ..dd~mdmR9 pc* h N O+ - n m C 'o w 'C p' w p K d w p' m a.. m m ry .y _ m w_y'dy ° o N p mKm p' n O rt M w `G ~~mN mG m om"'ti one~m HnNO'p'O y~`< w~'m ~mi •m~•,wm~ro Wes' p n G V i°-n r N y5 D9 w bY0 crb' d,H•?' Ydp cTO. y'Pq d n m °n °y " m O. N .m+ N m y N°4 ~i-LL... N, a vim. O•o r r.O d0••"'3'n D9.m H'm C C}' m ~•~`Q,b N aq mp p.m t°y N m y m M N pC.~Y'ME{HS. C G i°-n 'o'er °Crmn oai ° p.w cYm p'C o ~m ~ m p Mpmm. w b rt 7 w ro 0 ~O r p' o, m om .m ~.*pm ~mm°mwpHm° p.^ ~p•-<wnd m y M ON'm~s'o'<O'~ m 7 ro~yymn mm°•oa' 000 mP 5 y m R.M ~rd~ M m m n-O m.. P- m' G m 0 F+ N AY y.y O K n G M m G m K }y W p w ,M N w p K O ID ~ e? r O m M •J' n m omm` MyDap ° m yM.mem~m'p ,x"mm _dN C°yo omM H N mY'~.m ...m o'° o m rr y d E o °i oy,Cmm.. m ii Nmmo y.°, :+m o'o w'~m'Gwmmro y p~ O "M'Mo pp w0 m m d m o y N H p' m y m •n d M N w w°~ O m~ p G w .+'ms i> w .N.. ° m d n C m m' H 'M" d o °mmo " 'Gym o `C m m b O Vii a' d M p- n h^' m O. O i- l P d rt C d oo `~mm ° m m-'w^'a m~ ~~w M- mpwro'°'°m Pt c°,- r.o y,a b m ` o ow Hw m~xo 6m om C .w p'^...Cpm m ,a H ~7 G n Ww'*3 ~0 !D GGC. tdoo--p x0' oow ~f°~ V m Z m K,Cl m p w'p cwi 'o MO'm o„H~m mm 'opm mo7oWM o m O p m m'"'E " nC) p'm`4o d~' M O m°.d Ymm 00 mm HRy °Dgtiw oY Kam.. •+m~<xroc dp'~m-np p'°,'ym<,rrpmaY M"Y ~'m omm w. `z'~S')- ITIy m r ~ro.NOGRaw 7 .+mopeCP.e .roNm O' ^ PMOn mmo m m ^ ~ ro o ~pnOd`p. C Pq mvyy°ma'fNO ~P.HN'm Gp•oNm d... ,.m WC^'7 <m K N C.O m ~nb~~wc w o m0m~omvnpEmmp°mo° MmNGOyYoN w ® b m mdo p pmc.°.miwI m mu"q' N O ti MmKm°Ho D mMm_". F.OP•`<~'~tl 'a7 i°mmOm GwcWaRP.tl=7 a`r~n`~'G ro`C `0 µ`G z ° C H .4 N `G f/i O G 1 N mE: 1 ,y N 1-3 ~ o r o ~ O 0 (D d K] m O H w H' 7 O p ° 13 m 0O C+7 0 m o E z W H p es' ' ow t7 y p w H r m I Z N.O m M m `C N I Z d d b per" (D k. W E p 1 1 a z H N y L E r r 4 C H W 1 P 2 rM w m M d O G O m ',y r m 1 CJ my w - (D C p H O. rt H d t I H 7o m C rt H. a C H (D H ° c l m- d o . 0 m ..J q d O y a N rt 1 H -3 y rt w y l ~ a p 's m o• H p rt I 7 N C g O O oo ° x o' C 1 ;7 ' m G n o 0 v F P c (D O° 1 . o Z' O w M G • Cy a o O o o 3 N in m 1 z p ro o ~ v X 1' m 0 w E m' H r H ' O ~O F y 1 r V] o O D) > M 41 1 O H H mm m < 0 'OM 1 0 0 r ~O o m _ 1 : , 1 1 m p+ C, S , d w m 0 O H 'o 'G y 9 ( V O W 1 1 1 1 p C 7y V1 m ( D "Y~ to 1 1 Pq O m H M p w m- o H C i i x N r ~ i t e x x o ° m O m M p _ r O 1 1 ~ C O 1 1 W M 1 1 d O_m 1 I Y• 1 1 m m i 6 t1~2lQO w (D .'7 1 kl$k2i 31~ A J NCO A M t' '~y.. ' ~ ~I Q3JL'OOdd rt O p ~ 1 N, V1 c r * d m~i r, NO 301JJO 311 1 hl C31' (D n I .m 00VU0100 d C 31 V1S b m NOStJlf J OA yT00 o W p 1 d 1 r ' 0 ° b a. n - m n H w I .°s f! I I U V ON), h No W H ~ a m. i a n w c o"-.o w a a•o-y a' F m H C` v+K mMm v. m .y y O 1?ir' roG m°as n t°n° DEED OF TRUST a.9 m .OZP _ is ,K'y HStn..oM FROM O ?-i io•o a - -•i c.e ~Venim Pu. y>'~ m''ro o, ,r G; o a i pw o G y i 7 i 3ri,j Ci .4 Cq c~~ • C m1w a :Y• :H y: O n TN W m o a corporation. C' ? l'+ 0::~ w y G P iel v i-+ C jCa O- 7 b .~ooa' 1 TO TO r :n iH g ;m . x y K P 1 g',..e a' THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE O 'G 'G iv a 'M d ° ° :O R N~ :r1 O .`a' NMy Yrj-m o'C FOR THE USE OF - R, M o F"K'P o w a {p 'fC n :0 Fro Y y 8 a, :.m F G - is y' y 4mwR,~ a•ma V 00 STATE OF COLORADO, 1 :m w C_ w m 0 P ~ a Y x ° m ss. m :a E i ~ MY C 0 p e1 ..County of J ° im !~o c CO 0 co A m m 0, to co 5,1 I hereby certify that this instrument was filed i'-' o : ~.C 0 S$ M -W for record in my office at.............................. o'clock ; n n m 1 p :W :(D4 m I\ m m~~ 1 GPm • ;R ;fD ti V O M r?t....- 19....----- !r• :o H E C',I n a ro ' w F a and is duly recorr~•'W boo~y y a0 `F M P w o w m ro r 10 co oom pave........... ._C}0---.. t 5 ~ ;w n ny m m M N rt . Y'• .'C a~+ o Film No C Recce tion =t ° m g o M eey Q~ R carder t s ~ t kKk V _ y F pai ~p F"v': ~m t'rk.. -Q,. 1 1 - Mo p. m w DePUty.' C n w -m Ym rdw m V ti ~ 1 vX H m m O Fees, $ V` H m HK m m W m a' G 4' K H O W n {Y P S W Il, •4' m Ma O y eT or~asnino co., oenvsA ~ , ~ o m Giro m C'm .ic5'q'Pr~t9 (,a, JEFFERSON BANK & TRUST 759.J'WEST COLFAX AVENUE LAKEVJ A COLORADO 80215 °eywnw $aP ~°.,o wP C a`~'Cygo W"G ywna~nJm.°-.cw bG 'G •oi, fn+, ry Xm ~omw mW mma nw ~m o "J ov ~,c G .Y a rom m a' as V° 5~~-n~c* MG•t+. m zm °nyy `.o `D "'a.:",vm Vaw m~ CmPO o 100, `..+nxy ~.WOOammo CC `-"'C i°-y~° GP 7'v'C ~o P.y a ° Hi°-y a ' ~ G ' r ~ H n ° ~ . m P°~'aa~'rrymm m ~ o y p'.+.m-• a"tl i=ri o ~'d m m y F F N. N w m F m m m C W P. p 'C 7 `G m P'. t.4 °m n~. on ~.yva0 ao P° o'G 0, mG °F~nir pym a'O roo. aa. F,yN 7GFP m'04 mmp Cq ~a wHroO•Cro,"~,mKFF ~~e.°IZ Faro yKr 6'E U9'tuPmaA.-'. ~'yF°H mo meT'°m~c+.~'1.Pa, O'a'.~.'.m ..n C°,W yn M ~me"i m~ K'Cma P roN ~m m ma omP aught PYa n, `C'S P. m° ..mw o. ~•y'<o ° mmmn~ m ro tr a `C m .-aq m m n m ° ro m w m P o '"'ova F m5 a r°n m'C ro c o ro V P y 5.5. n, m o F om Pa•a. O m F 5K r.mnm m5o ° a• ow w 0.a.m,~y P.n m~.o K~kf omm wm °nm wofrtn kw.m 'Gnm1 -0 KW G m`GPMm"Ym mmyro o'b =ac+~o ~'Y noF orom m„'" '.1 Cam.:. wkb 0 " o . P a'F moA Om'4 oi°-nm yP Kn neo Pmn,ro w... Hma''T O m W cry K,ay.o ce_?:Fm =+o m tm ZFCH" 'p G ❑ m C G m w w Rro .P-h 'H 'C Gro rK,FM X a m `G o M~ m a . m ' a. m was m o m yo i°n~~cr--~m`CY omoOm yp'y° wK CL ac' 0 O'w .`°1 y~..P* .°eG OH ow o'm° oo„y~'n. `y°~ may p ' u V (C G N N w N m ro .a0°am m ror'e'FO~ ~+...-•IY v~ aY aN aGG~_py N Om0H ° o' rom C'0 mw wm o~mr CmN yW mSa mwp D.°m~'ym mo mK ~a.~°-..oopWOm. w.b FMa• p.ro r'd omm PW `"y Wnn Pamw M W F n "'1iv a F '-T' F o L7.C m m . F c. a 5' w ro K m o a. m C a w m om m F m n o~ va:M a;, ~ G` m aHOK K w . an NP -h o FPo,p ~ O. w"'n ~p w P 0 ~G' WV a o- PW m m roa: m mP+ ~gm .+.G P '°m d Hn 0 °..h a m O~0- w~' b a'~mb NO CMm C`C 'yFo,K or. Ko y~ M G n Cw`<,'P3 PO Fro .o n~ao.`-:TKO yom '"p• ~~-nryy aP,~ yam. Owo PFyP'm a'G U90 .Y T1 rr r.~..y m Oer 'OC of .'S -P"O `Ym n °N GPF e1C21 6q •'JukJCN ~y.uM~ y~ r ~mE.~YFH~O MoF mM Ma K~"m.+m0'3 e+°•'" P ~.oWF H R m m u W-M ni-ry K GW O'a009•H.G-r nN mmm Hm,ry F° .m 'y yoK nyPyP0 mHFw. N$ a azoFro m r W.-~' maH mo o°'>V` 0 oyV t7".~„ c:W ~oaq o Mw GFu yam roy,P ~N'Fii.•.~'s' bm m F~ m K Fa~•n HOO° yFYy~y yi°i,w ny Gom~KeP+m~oFOKa oK Ono cr ry•y C. PP yaq° Ko v,CO o 00 ~0 0 Ka•m m Froam H eF a roy 0- m a P PFO W 'd o. o w G Cy0,_C p0C4 ~°-nomp0 mo` qH' m:1 nym p; Kg m~ o y` koq m'b Pyro aKy"'mm o UNQ H Pq eR N G . a'F m m O y S. y o f W ~ a'o~W ~'y w ~.y otl 0 0 w y a m F a. m m ya a• m o p• a 'rY m pu y m a' w W y~.~ M eG" m N V,° W. y y O aO,ny O, r'T'rO Hmy .Mn 0 c+2 f• wMm WCr NOhJm P m 0 .ro K o Q4 P -C I a.m °".0'o7G PXy° ~m mmm G,roo, a.5S. xro m_.M ~Y. m7b Gqoo~ M,y n rorom G o~M ~~m owa °mo P. ~..a. UW''+ m aF...C !/PHm 00 eTKO O ~C H < OmK '.Y ".N Fy mPOwmP nMGa" O M F~ `K.R1 iY° 'yN 0° 00a ~,m NW iYm 0 00 p.'r1 a mm , Om O `YG aP m0 H rCOP m` O a H m e4 p a y, n m a' n. C `C n~ m w v m v G+p; K F ° ° ,+.°n P K,°eP~.`oroy°'roa `<a,.mmw mmw y map, a'xF yP mw wd C F a a'o m G H c+o a'W C roF o~ ry m n a ,Cro ~°'^.a M7 m y oro Fm KH•m 0v° oA H n of 7 y a G;ro °.'r nm ° `<o 'aG P F n'4 ro m Q K C F m w °i o v a• w v G o b' y o R ~'0"n ° o~ M P o 7w mm mY y~ om.S WV, m,Pa mro Fp., MFG m c n •a F?' Kam mm a.F~ w. Fa' K~ C.` C, dare llccurreniary Date tMAR 7 1969 rw r s zy2 bra n 0 y tr G m 9J N o W y a C m H C' rom m Oq C o n o C - y. o n R+ '1 Ef~ .~p~'-~-' OV p, m n p, ~ 91 m m a m m '„'S' m ro o C p y o Hl w p ro C] m p y :^S ' vim. ,$j d H n d tm+, m m 21 p' m m C ° p m ~r It ~ E CI r, ~ G~i $ °0y-r'L1 'n .IS:S~ R- m{"~' o rma ? N :f H m m ro H C m F3 tl. „e C m It o l7 I b m G ro et M b 7 V1"~.. N.-,^~,' '4 ct -Ij fj r O m C m H d m d W' O m C° m I.C H m H d •E ME, :1 X N (D •mr rom 0 9 p 1-3 t" y N 1-3 0 WISP m• W m o. m N ro a y w _F"a 'd a, `C-7 ro x' ° m N H" w Q+' y - y Y3 c. e o• a c m w m ddi. d ~i - d X333""" ' ,,gg .P o. m m ti y nl ct p• ':l m Ul (D P -'F.. ~F+.;'~ H d m m °q oa O H m° m m ty a E 4 a p W m L~ y mv' p 7 Al A• d w. p m m m (D m n m• H- N Fn H t-' m n n i,s'1 as N( d m C Q+ CY 9 O H y w. o O H d' Fh m o H „ n o a m o d-.~ ;m d:;flR<1 [H,1 m c a K k o rrn- n o• d i rn 'n' a 0 0 m G z M' b A, ro Q~ m m .mf N d ro G O 'C d ° d. 0 y H .yam..mtl " m• o (D [D ,^OH d ° o~^t^a 4- m a y m m a G O m. P 7 m m 'U Si ~1 x 0' m G m 8 v m m O c.-h7 m m Z m n c.' ye. p m c. m y w 'A H t" m o N N , p s* y m /t OH M d rp m M `d G o d m o ro e+ fi 8 G H m O C C O O(D m n O CD CD O .'f CY g M a m m (S O 'b '"1.' a o r C Y H H. ,m m K Kl w m- p e. `D n p O (0 (U O m m W H Q. m ^p. 1'i y 'm G ct p- a..m. o: m 0 a .m-. G m O ° y m y m n k0 y m °y " m w d K 'II (D :Z .h1 b M m m m m m m m H y Y h l ¢ rp Cf Cn Sli (D O H'. I~ .y. m U m m m ro w p Ci• m m N. m m m m C m (D O H m m H r m I m a H NO UZl p• f_° m x m (DD y m ro i1 m m rn d 8. p n G ro a ,my, K W N LG t-F (t w o d 1 l< o rr b C x y i O m o. o m O 0 m O F' m, d 1 ti (D [+y m o e t, (D w :5 m . m~ q yj y m m Ho p m lO m m ro m tY ct (D C G m n d d m tr' c f° S- n m m C (D N m b' 7 1 C+] k '.d G c H O a m tu m m y m m p H H q m (t (D w I m o m m' M o. o n K m ° K1 G H w d w m m m 1 x O p mm• M O' O d v O m n y ro I m n 0 m (D 1 w a mm m 7 H m Fh m w 1 m d b m d g my. rr w M (D ym H ro O H m w m w m° p' Fh N d o 'd q i Y m i i y m N N w .n vi m o pp~qq- m m m N K C ° p' y o• I o G DI m tu n n m M C m m m 7 C C o H n k (D N co M K O m ro b 1 W n~ ro v o G H? a' m oq y m y E d m m m H O !11 a G ~C• m I m n o b m p m m dm o o aq tu n a. w O O n O M O o w 'C m 1 y, O d F] 50 Pa ro a tu b QJ 8 m m m,~y (D m X o a. K K 7a (7 m N 1 H y H X m lc.- ro 9 m m fl) i.C m o n q m '40 a. H ro n m 17' K cr ° o P. O tIp 13 tt O °J o, . m a a m b O (D v E M n m m 1 ro N . 7 'y C~,-:> H E m Q. br' m w P° 9 c w m a° G 0 L], n m w I >Z m ° O - m a d d m tD c o m m a w. m M (t O n o a ~e 1 O' a x w F,. (t m m_ r0 m o a C m m° p' m w [t :1 w d c o I 0 y G' m O CJ N 1 H _ d. iP m [D n N G ry m " m m C m O' Fi _ ro hj d• 4 aq, (D w (D 0 u9 y y m I m d J H L~~] o G w" H, w o d y~y m no (t (D a M i a H F-' 91 p Y o to :T 'd a. 'Cm H F'' X l< m m o I 7 a o` `d o 0, m N m w o m y` y 0 m M k lO (i' F' 1 a or" w. y SS H '°-n m .mdi y p m m o y Q, x t0 O m I n NJ iJO:i^ a ''U S 8 m w p m p 'w m o I m G yJ Sf23"1-n1Nf1O~ A n m N t7 C m ~ m w w ro m H. Ho 7 R (t N SD m m it .v iw ' F3;'Q °Ha z p m i H w w p Oq Z5 N a I° ~,~1 ObOa3L~ m zA K (e-•. _A m d m cD H ro m d• m m m Qj m m I d J lqW MP :J d z r m m H d m m .1 ° 69 Nld 6~ Z( uu < 6"~ r. m G AJ d a, m W m m Y H K M ro 6 1 ~tl~ y „ N 'y W (D "a- d O n m per,. O d d d S ,aJ y; p O° m t`.' o m ro m m 8 O m 4 o v; VJ L1 w a m d rom y m o G d p m ,°d y p G ro m r m L 4~ 9 V'1 V3 - tom] [+7 t7 'a H m (D d H m m ❑ o m H t, p I~ 5 117 ° 9 a a 'd SS n- y y m ° d w Q n o y g i, J.I i S ro W tV ~ ?*a r• ib 0 ~ o w w d' i9 c9 I-h 10 G3 q o ~ IE o No......... WARRANTY DEED TO STATE OF COLORADO, l} County of I I hereby certify that this instrument was filed for record in my office this day of....................................................... A. D. 19........ at.. ...............o'cloek:._..._---M., and duly recorded in Book Page......_.................--. I ..........................................................................Recorder. By ............:...................._............-..-...................--DeUUCY.... I Fees, $ Mail to:.. return to) 1 - future tax statements to:(a 8-W ...pron.-........ PTO. CO., n[.rea 7500 West 29th Wheat Ridge, C COPY The City of Wheal Ridge FAX 303/235-2857 April 7, 2006 Stanley Pouw Pouw & Associates, Inc. 190 E. 9'" Ave., Suite 250 Denver, CO 80203 Dear Mr. Pouw: The fees for the proposed land use applications total $4,250. This includes a credit of $2,400 for the previous land use applications. Please see breakdown of the fees below: Special Use Permit (with Site Plan) SOU Application Fee (non-administrative) $ 500 ~W Plus $300/acre (7 acres) $ 2,100 Publication/Public Notice Fee 150 Minor Subdivision (with dedication) Application Fee $ 800 Iu~ Plus $200/acre (14 acres) $ 2,800 Publication/Public Notice Fee $ 300 Total $ 6,650 Credit for publication/public notice fee (SUP0404) $ 300 Credit for application fee (MS0401) $ 300 Credit one-half application fee (SUP0404) $1,800 Balance due $ 4,250 Payment is due upon application. Enclosed is a copy of our fee schedule. Please feel free to contact me at 303-235-2846 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Kathy Field Administrative Assistant Enclosures: fee schedule 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 303/ 235-2846 Fax: 303/235-2857 Date: City Staff Present: Location of meeting: Property address: Property owner(s): Property Owner(s) present? Applicant representatives: Existing Zoning: The City of Wheat Ridge March 28, 2006 Meredith Reckert Prospect Valley Elementary School, 3400 Pierson Street 11225 W. 32"1 Avenue Applewood Baptist Church 11200 W. 32"d Avenue No Stanley Pouw (architect) Gary Theander (civil design engineer) Sheldon Emery (landscape architect) Fred Lantz (traffic engineer) Residential-One Comprehensive Plan Designation: South half: Single family detached residential not to exceed four dwelling units per acre North half: Agricultural/Estate Residential not to exceed one dwelling unit per acre Existing Use/Site Conditions: The property contains roughly 14.7 acres. There is an existing education building on the property with a building footprint of approximately 8,323 square feet, three stories in height with a basement. Other site improvements include three curb cuts, drives, landscaping, detention areas and parking for roughly 213 vehicles. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant intends on applying for a special use permit to allow the construction of an additional education building. The new structure will have a 14,450 square foot footprint with three stories of height. It will be similar in architecture and will be connected to the existing building. Parking for an additional 244 cars will be located to the north of the new building. The church currently has the northern portion of the property under contract for purchase by a developer who will be pursuing construction of clustered patio homes. It was noted that this development proposal is not part of the church's request for special use approval. The proposed housing project will be handled through a separate zoning process. A full-width dedicated street running down the western property line will provide access to the church's parking lot as well as access to the housing development. The following issues were discussed regarding the SUP request: • How big is the proposed building? About 35,700 square feet of total building area with measurements of roughly 70'x 170' or 11,900 square foot footprint added to a connector building. • Will fill dirt have to be brought onto the site? The property is being designed so that no additional dirt will be brought onto the property; the aim is to balance the necessary cut and fill on-site if possible, sometimes some fill is required. • Will the building be the same height as the original? Yes, the building addition will be 35' in height. Both the existing structure and the building addition will have an average height of 35' based on the City's definition of "building height" which is measured from average finished grade, although some of the building walls may exceed 35' in vertical height. The roofline of the addition should not be as high as the roof of the existing structure. • Why does the church need such a big building? Over the past five years, attendance has grown by 10%per year. The addition will be used for educational purposes and other church events. The addition will contain a multi purpose room with a portable stage. • Will the proposed detention pond hold water? Standing water will be in the detention pond only during a major storm. Security fences will not be necessary for safety. A drainage plan and report will be required with submission of the special use permit application. • Where will bus storage be located? At the northeast corner of the existing education building. • What type of lighting is being proposed? It was noted that the existing site and structure lighting emits glare and bleeds over the property line onto the adjacent residential properties to the east. If the existing lighting does not meet the City's standards, it could be brought into compliance when the new improvements are made. A photometric plan will be required with the SUP application. • What is maximum building coverage allowed in the R-1 zone district? A maximum of 25% of R-I zoned property can be covered with buildings. • What affect will there be on Lena Gulch and the wildlife habitat to the north? Would the church be willing to dedicate this area as open space? The increased amount of property covered by buildings and parking could negatively affect the Lena Gulch wildlife corridor. • Who will review the traffic impact analysis? How is it analyzed? The traffic impact analysis is reviewed by the city's traffic engineer using standardized traffic generation volumes based on use and size of the structure. • What provisions have been made for pedestrian crossing W. 32°d Avenue? The current system utilizing church volunteer crossing guards will be continued. • What provisions have been made for buffering to the homes to the east? A landscape buffer comprised of trees and shrubs is proposed. The landscape architect indicated that they would be willing to work with the neighbors along Quail Street regarding the landscaping. • Can the neighbors review the technical documents? Yes, once an application is made, the technical documents submitted with the application are considered part of the public record. The file can be reviewed in the Community Development department in city hall. • Can restrictions be incorporated into an SUP approval? Yes, there can be site development limitations and use restrictions; one such restriction could be to prohibit the use of the property as a private school. There are also grant of use flexibilities regarding vesting of the SUP approval. The following issues were discussed regarding the proposed housing development to the north (to be handled separately from the SUP request for the church expansion). These issues/questions were addressed by Steve McKendry, developer of the property who has the northern portion under contract for purchase: • How many units are proposed? 24-26 units • How tall will the buildings be? 1 to 1-112 stories in height. • Will the Lena Gulch 100-year floodplain be impacted? The developer is intending on channelization of a portion of the gulch in accordance with UDFCD's (Urban Drainage and Flood Control District) plans to provide more developable area. • What is the existing zoning on the property? The existing zoning on the property is R-1 which permits only single family residential homes with 12,500 sf. lots. The proposed, clustered patio homes will require a zone change to PRD (Planned Residential Development). This will be handled separately from the SUP request. • What sort of access is being proposed? Primary access will be via Robb Circle extended to the north as a full-width public street. Secondary, emergency access is yet to be determined. i rak Aale-wood V BAPTIST CHURCH CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD INPUT MEETING Applewood Baptist Church is proposing a;Special Use Permit on property located at 11225 W 32"a.'Ave, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033. A neighborhood meeting will be held on March 28, 2006 at 7:00 PM at the Prospect Elementary School Gym, 3400 Pierson Street, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033. . The purpose of this request is to allow the construction of a new Education Building to connect to the existing education building, and the necessary parking to go along with it. The project has ' j been redesigned with better buffering and landscaping. _I i E The City of Wheat Ridge has.adopted a requirement that prior to any application for Special Use - Permits an applicant must notify all residents and property owners within 600 feet and invite them to a Neighborhood InputMeeting. The purpose of this meeting is to allow the applicant to present his proposal to the neighborhood and to give the neighborhood a .forum to express their concerns, issues and desires, A Staff Planner will attend the meeting to discuss City policies and regulations and the process involved, however the Planner will remain impartial regarding viability of the project. ; Keep in mind that this is not a public hearing. Although a synopsis of the meeting will be entered as testimony, it is the public hearing in front of the City Council where decisions are rendered. If you want input in the decision-making process, it is imperative that you attend the public hearing. The kind of concerns residents normally have include the following: • Is the proposal compatible with the surrounding land use and zoning? • Are there adequate utilities and services in place or proposed to serve the project? • What is the impact on our streets? • How will this proposal affect my property? • Where will the storm drainage go? • How will the project be designed to enhance rather than detract from the neighborhood? What specific changes can be made to the proposal to make it more acceptable to me? If you have any questions, please call the Planning Division at 303 235 2846. If you are unable to attend the meeting, you may mail comments or concerns to: City of Wheat Ridge, Community Development Department, 7500 West 29'h Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033. 1111200 W. 32nd Avenue . Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 • Phone 303-232-9575 Fax .303-238-2513 F r MATI; Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 3062 Robb Cir 3137 Robb Cir 3273 Pierson St Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 3362 Simms St 11520 W 32nd Ave 3084 Routt Cir Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Lakewood, CO 80215 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 2997 Routt Cir 3370 Simms St 11575 W 32nd Ave Lakewood, CO 80215 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 11440 W 38th Ave 11100 W 38th Ave 3184 Routt St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Lakewood, CO 80215 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 11127 W 31 st Ave 11340 W 38th Ave 11225 W 32nd Ave Lakewood, CO 80215 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 3400 Pierson St 11100 W 38th Ave 3203 Pierson St #APPRO Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 3400 Simms St 3430 Simms St 3370 Simms St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Current Resident 3331 Routt St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 * Search Parameters * Jefferson (CO) * 10/6/2005 * 3:25 PM Street Number ...22 3062 ROBE CIR 3137 ROBB CIR 3273 PIERSON ST 3362 SIMMS ST 11520 32ND AVE,W 3084 ROUTT CIR 2997 ROUTT CIR 3370 SIMMS ST 11575 32ND AVE,W 11440 38TH AVE,W 3184 ROUTT ST 11127 31ST AVE,W 11340 38TH AVE,W 11225 32ND AVE,W 3400 PIERSON ST 11100 38TH AVE,W 3203 PIERSON ST #APPRO 3400 SIMMS ST 3430 SIMMS ST 3331 ROUTT ST Curr t Resident . C ent Resident Curren esident 11200 2 Ave 3187 bb C 11289 W Ave Lakew 80033 Denver 80215 Lake od, O 80215 Current Resident - Curr t Resident Curr t Resident 3197 Ra b C 11490 8th ~e 3046'1 b Cir Lakewoo O 80215 Wheat Ri CO 80033 Lakewood, 0215 Curr t Rest nt Cu ent Re ent Current R~est'dent 3067 R b Cir 3078 Cir 30k¢ o(b Cir Lake o CO 80215 Lakew o O 80215 La wodV CO 80215 Current Resident Curr t Resid t Current Resident 3095 uai t 3049 Ro it 3062 Robb Cir Lakewo CO 80215 Lakew d, O 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Current Resident Curr t Resi Curr t Resident 3137 Robb Cir 3045 Q St 3159 Ro it Lakewood, CO 80215 Lake ood, 80215 Lake od, C 80215 Current Resident Current esident Current Resident \ 11264 W 31 ve _ 3253 Piers S 3273 Pierson St J Lakewood O 15 Wheat Ri 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Curre t Resident Curr t Reside t Current wide 3274 Q it 3254 Q i t 11553 W st PI Wheat R' CO 80033 Wheat id CO 80033 Lake od, 80215 Curr>RoC dent Curre t R esiden Current Resident 3024 11555 sv e 3223 rson St 80215 Wheat g CO 80033 Wfkat Ri CO 80033 Curre t Resident Cur nt Re ent Curre Re ' nt 3224 Qu ' S 3342 ,Kms St 3047 tt Cir Wheat 80033 Wheal Ridge, CO 80033 L ewood, O 80215 Current Resident Curre t Resident i Current Resident\, 3362 Simms St / 11158 ve 11520 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 j` Whe i e, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Curre t Reside 299413'ou it Denver O 15 Current Resident 3370 Simms St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Cur t Reside t 3087 R tt r Lakewo O 80215 Current Resident 1151 29tljP~ Lakewoo O 80215 Curre Resident 3322 Si s Wheat g , O 80033 Currem,Resi 11595 Pd nd Ave e, O 80033 Curren Resident 11256 8 ve Wheat R' CO 80033 e Resid Curr 3292 Si a St Wheat a CO 80033 Curre~t Reside 11108 3 d Ave Wheat ge, CO 80033 Current Resident 3084 Routt Cir /1J Lakewood, CO 80215 Curr t Resident 3220 Ro tt Wheat , CO 80033 / Current Resident 11575 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Current Resident 2997 Routt Cir Lakewood, CO 80215 Cu t Resident 11502 PI Lakew od, 80215 Curr t Resident 2987 R tt Lake 60 80215 Curr t Reside Curre t Resident 3252 Si t 2984 Rd Cir Whea id CO 80033 Lakewo 80215 Curren esident Current sident 3272 Wheat Si t 11481 W Whe Kat idgCO 80033 Lakewoo ~ON2 215 Current Resident Curren esident 11440 W 38th Ave 11254 W ve Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 / Wheat ge, 80033 Curren eside Curren esident . 3025 Quai 3293 Pie rNp~t Lakewo C 80215 Wheat ge, CO 80033 wtt Curr Reside Curre esi 11157 t -Ave 3327 P' n St Lake od, C 215 Whe Ridge, -CO 80033 Curr t Resid t Cu t Resi t 3294 Qu ' t 3065 St Whea idge, O 80033 La oo , O 80215 Curr Res' t Curre Reside Curren es 10968 1 st Ave 115__W d Ave 10991 th PI Lake ood, O 80215 Wheat dge, O 80033 Lakewood, CNO 80215 Current,Resident Current Resident Curre Resident 3086 Parfe 3298 ail 11038 Lakewo , C 80215 Whea ~ e, CO 80033 Lak ood, bO' 80215 Curren Resident Curren Resident Current Rest ent 11057 31st Ave 11068 31s e 11027 W stA, Lakewood, O 215 Lakewo ,CO 80215 Lakewo 80215 Curre Resident Curr tR esident - Curre Resident 11435 Ave Whe 3 Ave 3154 Whe edge, O 80033 Whe a ~ CO 80033 Lake o , CO 80215 Current Resident - Curre Resident Current Resident i 3184 Routt St 3050gy 11127 W 31 st Ave Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 % Curr t Resident Currenl'lllc id Curren ,Resident 3060 l 11158 W s ve 3054 Rou C' Lakew 80215 Lake od, CO 8 15 Lakew O 80215 Curr t Resident Curr [Reside `Current Resident 1 10957 3 Ave 3241 t 11340 W 38th Ave Lake , CO 80215 Whe i e, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Curre Resident Curre KResid Curre esiden 3495 I S 3395 3345 Qu Wheats CO 80033 Whea80033 Whea idg CO 80033 Current Resident 11225 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Current Reside t 324 St at Ri e, CO 80033 Curre Resident 3310 t W at Ridg , CO 80033 Curre t Reside Current esident 3281 Ro t 3291 Rou Whea ida CO 80033 Whe idge, O 80033 Corte t Reside Current esi 3275 Q it t 3204 Qu ' t Wheat e, CO 80033 Wheat idge, O 80033 C rant Resident 3411 Wheat Pierson St Ridge, CO" 80033/ % Curren>Idge, de 11151 d Ave Wheat O 80033 Current Resident I1100 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 800) Current Resident 3203 Pierson St #APPRO Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Current Resident i 3370 Simms St Wheat Ridge, CO ~0013 Curren Resident 3201 Ro t Wh idg CO 80033 Current Resident 3400 Simms St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 j Current Resident 3331 Routt St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033% Curr t Resident 3200 St eat Ri e, CO 80033 Current Resident 3430 Simms St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033% Curre Resident Wh 3595 Q;rk+-ST- Wh at Ri e, CO 80033 Current eside Curren esident Cu nt Resident 3595 Qua' t 35,5 Qua 3595 Wheat dge, O 80033 Wheat g CO 80033 t Ri e, CO 80033 Anthony K. Craven Mark A. Sates David Wayne Moss 3280 Routt St. 3455 Quail St. 3221 Routt St. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Dolores F. Archer Arthur A. Gibbard Duane P. Chesley 3260 Routt St. 3415 Quail St. 3261 Routt St. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Applewood Baptist Church Michael Larkin & Barbra Larkin Phillip Wondra & Shannon Rae Wondra 11200 W 32nd Ave 3187 Robb Cir 11289 W 30th Ave Lakewood, CO 80033 Denver, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Jeffrey Pritt John Odom Jr. & Lorrie Furman Odom Margaret Howard 3197 Robb Cir 11490 W 38th Ave 3046 Robb Cir Lakewood, CO 80215 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Lakewood, CO 80215 Raymond Langen & Winona Langen James Mckay Warren Mcnassor & Virginia Mcnassor 3067 Robb Cir 3078 Robb Cir 3099 Robb Cir Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Cindy Danaher Nyla Leprino Alvan Perry & Rita Perry 3095 Quail St 3049 Robb Cir 2020 S Monroe St 9302 Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Denver, CO 80210 Joseph Broccio Paul Wood & Kathleen Wood Jason & Tracy Case 2895 Robb Cir 3045 Quail St 3159 Robb Cir Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Clare Hamilton E T Bond III & Esther Bond Richard Atchison & Charlene Atchison 11264 W 3lstAve 3253 Pierson St 12115 W 29th PI Lakewood, CO 80215 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Lakewood, CO 80215 John Jeppesen Joee Ann Schleusner & Jeff Schleusner Gary Riedel & Sherri Riedel 3274 Quail St 3254 Quail St 11553 W 31st PI Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Lakewood, CO 80215 Gene Mulligan & Ann Rita Mulligan Clifford Elson Timothy James & Daniel James 3024 Routt Cir 11555 W 32nd Ave 3223 Pierson St Lakewood, CO 80215 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Paul Michael Cress & Traci Denise Cress John Emge Barry Willmarth & Teri Willmarth 3224 Quail St 3342 Simms St 3047 Routt Cir Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Lakewood, CO 80215 Paul Wells & Johanna Wells Wilfred Sugai Applewood Knolls Swim & Tennis Club 1 16546 W 79th Dr 11158 W 33rd Ave PO Box 1741 Arvada, CO 80007 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80034 Declan & Ann-marie Constelloe Baxter Glenneta M Life Estate Lana Beun 2994 Routt Cir Sam Baxter 111 2997 Routt Cir Denver, CO 80215 PO Box 1405 Lakewood, CO 80215 Dubois, WY 82513 Roger Knight - David Lucas & Nancy Lucas Jeffrey Archer 1800 Washington Ave 3220 Routt St 11502 W 31st PI Golden, CO 80401 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Lakewood, CO 80215 Etha Logan Gary Schroeder & Patricia Schroeder Ralph Perri II & Deborah Perri 3087 Routt Cir 12600 W Auburn Ave 1090 Holland St Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80228 Lakewood, CO 80215 Jack Eastman & Anne Eastman Laura Nelson Scott Mitchell & Phoebe Mitchell 2987 Routt Cir 11511 W 29th PI 3252 Simms St Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Edwin Post & Elizabeth Post Bette Jean Rodricks Timothy Seidel & Lorraine Seidel 2984 Routt Cir 3322 Simms St 3272 Simms St Lakewood, CO 80215 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 John Peters & Marietta Peters Dawn Mlatecek John m Jr. & Lorrie Odom 11481 W 29th PI 11595 W 32nd Ave 11490 W th Lakewood, CO 80215 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Whea e, O 80033 Carol Green Jerry Turner & Louise Turner Phillip & Betty Burk 11254 W 38th Ave 11256 W 38th Ave 3025 Quail St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Lakewood, CO 80215 Gregory Jarvis & Barbra Ramsey Jarvis John Patrick Pruyn Jr. & Linda Pruyn Bartoletti Properties Lip 3293 Pierson St 3292 Simms St 11157 W 31st Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Lakewood, CO 80215 Elizabeth Hart James Shanon & D Jo Shannon Linda Hock 3327 Pierson St 11108 W 33rd Ave 3294 Quail St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Robert Roehl Madeline Hart Thomas Miller & Mary Miller 3065 Quail St 10968 W 31st Ave 11590 W 32nd Ave Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Raymond Black & Cynthia Black Freeman Amy Johnson Sylvester Rohr & Mary Rohr 10991 W 30th PI 3086 Parfet Dr 3298 Quail St Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Charlotte Derstler & Richard Salankey Craig Stephen Buth & Susan Marie Buth Wallis Gamble & Maureen Gamble 11038 W 31st Ave 11057 W 31st Ave 11068 W 31st Ave Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Susan Paddock Rodney Patrick & Jeanette Patrick Emerson Droullard & Lily Droullard 11027 W 31st Ave 11435 W 32nd Ave 11560 W 32nd Ave Lakewood, CO 80215 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Rocco The Astuno Jr. Millicent Scott & B D George David Cole & Marjorie Cole Rocco Violet Astuno 188 Chippewa Cir 3050 Quail St 3154 Routt St Henrietta, NY 14467 Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Fred Willson Walter Prebis & Lona Prebis Ronald Mccartney & Constance Mccartne PO Box 83 3060 Quail St 11158 W 31st Ave Manville, WY 82227 Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Carl Hansen & Betty Hansen Hugh Eugene Baker & Barbara Baker Anthony Marcello & Lori Joan Marcello 3054 Routt Cir 10957 W 31st Ave 3241 Routt St Lakewood, CO 80215 Lakewood, CO 80215 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Louis Ficco & Anthony Ficco James & Adele Otoole Jerome Scezney & Jacqueline Hunt 3650 Vance St #1 3495 Quail St 3395 Quail St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Leila Hill & Mc Arthur Hill Applew d Ba Church Ernest Wright & Patricia Wright 3345 Quail St 11200 W d Ave 3240 Routt St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Whea edge, O 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Virginia Cellars & Robert Cellars Jeffrey Nielsen & Jeffery Nielsen Ross Casados Jr. & Olga Casados 3310 Routt St 3281 Routt St 3291 Routt St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Jefferson County School District R-1 David Digiacomo & Leeanne Digiacomo Shawn & Cathy Swainson 1829 Denver West Dr 3275 Quail St 3204 Quail St Golden, CO 80401 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Harbert Hartline & Ruth Hartline Louise Turner & D Edwards Loren Rodney Casados & Linn Phelps 11151 W 32nd Ave 5393 Maggie Ln 3201 Routt St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Evergreen, CO 80439 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Peter Klammer & Cynthia Klammer 3200 Routt St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Leno Llc 15947 W Ellsworth Ln Golden, CO 80401 Deborah Kidder 3370 Simms St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Ro Knig 1800 ngton Ave Gold , CO 401 William Cook 3595 Quail St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Dmk Investment Company 120 S Riverside Piz Chicago, IL 60606 William Coo 35 ua' t Wheat 80033 Roger King 18 ington Ave Gn, 804o 01 Jill Mustoffa & Joerg Friebel 3615 Quail St Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Willi Coa t Ardalan Hardi & Tom Patterson Frederick Gimeno & Gimeno Donna Starr 3595 Qu 3615 Quail St 1628 Ogden St Wheat 'dge, 80033 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Denver, CO 80218 * Search Parameters * Jefferson (CO) * 10/6/2005 * 12:19 PM Parcel Number ...111 39 282 05 064 39 282 05 065 39 282 05 066 39 282 05 067 39 282 05 068 39 282 05 069 39 282 05 078 39 282 05 084 39 282 05 085 39 282 05 090 39 282 05 091 39 282 05 092 39 282 05 023 39 282 05 030 39 282 05 031 39 282 05 034 39 282 05 036 39 282 05 037 39 282 05 054 39 282 05 055 39 282 05 056 39 282 05 057 39 282 05 058 39 282 05 059 39 282 05 061 39 282 05 038 39 282 05 039 39 282 05 040 39 282 05 041 39 282 05 042 39 282 05 043 39 282 05 044 39 282 05 045 39 282 05 046 39 282 05 048 39 282 05 050 39 282 05 051- 39 282 05 052 39 282 05 053 39 282 05 071 39 282 05 072 39 282 05 073 39 282 05 074 39 282 05 086 39 282 05 087 39 282 04 049 39 282 06 003 39 282 06 004 39 282 06 005 39 282 06 006 39 282 06 007 39 282 06 008 39 282 06 .009 Search Parameters (continued) 39 282 06 010 39 282 06 Oll 39 282 06 012 39 282 06 013 39 282 06 014 39 282 06 016 39 282 06 017 39 282 07 001 39 283 02 Oll 39 283 02 012 39 283 02 013 39 283 02 014 39 283 02 015 39 283 02 020 39 283 02 021 39 283 02 022 39 283 02 023 39 283 02 024 39 283 02 025 39 283 02 026 39 283 02 027 39 283 03 001 39 283 04 001 39 283 04 002 39 283 04 003 39 283 04 004 39 283 04 014 39 283 04 015 39 283 04 016 39 283 04 017 39 283 04 018 39 283 05 001 39 283 05 002 39 283 05 003 39 283 05 004 39 283 05 005 39 283 05 006 39 283 05 007 39 283 05 026 39 283 05 027 39 283 05 028 39 283 05 029 39 283 05 030 39 283 05 031 39 283 05 032 39 283 06 001 39 283 06 002 39 283 06 003 39 283 06 004 39 283 07 004 39 283 07 005 39 283 07 006 39 283 07 007 39 283 07 008 39 283 07 010 39 283 07 011 39 282 05 110 39 282 06 019 ~r N, Z 5W21 _ l -11 =11 ~Iwi 1 halo 1 =1 L _ g $ LOUISE TURNER MM $ PARK 3m R-C 3m g UUU\ z "M 3 ~ ~ O 3,W R-3 L L m R-3 ' 3 / \ 6, ~m 3,ID' ® 361 / ~ T y F ~ ,1 ' (v 3si1 3M3 YMr HARDI 6 T ' f SUB ROB. ~>F'ff R W WR i AVE R_ Q e a • U W 35 1H PL • ell ~ 4 K B e . a ~ ~ W S & RAA R-1 PR PELT L~A w PR V LEY w E EM N ° ' S OOL m ° a • - (n 5 6 ~ 8 9 R-1 w t+ Z W33R D AVE U n Z p A ill 711 p, m m o cs~ < wm fi ~ j a m ° R A - - GITV LIMIT3 GITT LIMITS OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WHEAT RIDGE COLORADO 5W 28 PARCEULOT BOUNDARY (DESIGNATES OWNERSHIP) WATER FEATURE * DENOTES MULTIPLE ADDRESSES 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN (APPROXIMATE LOCATION) NW 28 O 100 200 30D CO Fm DEPARTMENTOF MAP ADOPTED: June 15, 1994 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Last Revision: September 10, 2001 N Z 1688 o 4 1 06-115 05-036 Vail ~3'22ezi~- 05-071 06072 (166. 60.01' 06073 05-074 t6Z50' 160.21' 06038 05-053 133.50' 1]6.50' 06039 13a.1a 06052 06-040 (n6 o1' 13¢.30' OS-0a o 0$1 03-0a2 /p,/q~~'~''yy_~~ '1 K9gpy I)6I 05-054 Brootside 05-055 5-064 05-064 06056 06057 7 135.W o5■ 05-061 1122211 06as 16s ] 169 ] (1715 01-01 44106.001 1 0602 1 06-003 1 06003 1 1 06032 1 06001 ` \ 03-01 103-001 1 03001 I 03-001 103-001 1 0 001 I 03 _ - 32Nff AVE_- 19 mz ai-oot 0300+- 0300+ ai6o1. 03001. ao+ 6z o+ 0x.1 WCO+~' 06W2 X0]3 WC03 ~ OSOOt~ :3 ~ 3 I -03 02 id mVL 01 1 1 apl s0d0 „b T .Beg °pig 1 • 50 l DI l OS031 e ~ ~\~y~ 0s3ppW1-+V--• py 1 ~~11 'x22 Bcw] n~¢~ f ✓ u as 2 J° A4f I '~]~r_ - 3157AVE WGO~`°' X034 dC X003 I . ° ✓ 02023 1 `;'lyli ~ m SW3 0300 y m ] 9% llb J- P~w~ IxI SO - 02$ rv U 02- 0^ ,weo 3e.Pr L f as 0 ry~ n4 ✓ _ _ 3157AY~- OAl - 0x019 c 31ST PL - 6s029 °S ✓ l 02624 Y 8 ~Op_ ~ 6 ~ 1' t~ 04Wt 1°]V I vo~ L- l 16:,.eP' Ro YJ a ry 0&025 \ Of8 ~ ar I I ~(AI/.•AS~1„~,'- f(I]M, 07W2 0]W3 070]4 .✓e~ , Vp s 1 O 017 - - A/ 0 / I fr _ _ s ) V\, \ 02-02s 02- 28 02 026 . K 02 029 nv1 +,w.] , °Ib~w' i" 6&02] ✓ ` w?z~y a z 6a-o6z oz az] ~\I~' o• o a]-wfi 0s P arw. / G e w - dws it, o it, o] ] u2s. % m 1 y V 64-616 v 06033 -30TH PL x167 v P b Z/' -44' j~ 2, 9 9, S 071-013 07412 07-011 u 6 3 ~w~y 10x5' el, n 1 z\ py t5 a] 06W 1,.016 110,1 \5 62 034 02639 xOI a 29TH FL _2 ^ rzac kkSS~.~, 14 n.,~-r~Rl•Rgf_ ,V 6SC08 4t,::f6'r, L?Bb , \ V,~yjtl. A t-. t1~568 06033 0]-609 ° OS025 x. r J o CY0o5 1 0&002 ,'3byp-Y „Par 1+-ro9 .3 az.ms e &OOt ~ 04004 ~J ~ ,arpx lq [09 r 1 ` 4 1x1 'I I' +t 012 -t ~ /i ~'S 02036 A 0S010 i / 06012 ~%-Ot3 11Par 1, .013 ° ~O t1D]6 Oa0^A \s'- 9 6&007 - 0s623 06.607 ^USS S' 'I 6&022 - g 05.61, p0 11014 10&\48- 8my @ 4ob b 1 1~ _ Rr OS021 OSOt2tl 06 0]9 . $ 06[08 8 1 11W7 oso 3 s n o6a 11-015~.p \ 0&619 asno `fi _ P ml eJ r5e.5] / 'o-F`T ItY - S> / _ E 1.p35 ! it-016 04015 10gV1 lm p OS036 3 ' yOY~~_. rC \ S64W5~ `,v ~s ~ OS017 8 0S016 _ 04006 .'.e 09W4 0.W3O4WZ.,°~o4W1. o4CU1 i 1o-001 b 11-Ot y ]P.x° 1_._._11 ].PP , 1 1].P6 I ev C$ 2115 0 42 ..ROB&CIR - - - - - _ 6406] 6 0 n ol,lL ~Bw _iex3o "I °O1O° P ++.063 16609 ~ ar I 3 0P039 ~e faO3z -F' ,SSet b~ G OS0,0 04011 °04001 - 04W1 16013 1&012 1&611 w 166,6p _ _ - ~,=0. P900 Pf3OL ,6638 N 11-662 11 633 I'llit' --38TH RIB-._._._ _ ,6063 '°5 116a0e am - n m25tl 1, Cn n 16W] _ u 16014 16015 4 a+& _ ./F R ,60056 1~~ y ,60]3 'j 162 1&COt $ 16W1 n $ 16016 lnao] i q f 1661] a I z. I g, 21l I W 9e]tl 1o1.W' 1Wm' 1&089 ~15A90. ! 16020 LAKC-_'M100 10005 16021 m,` ,6012 e 16035~µ "513x]' II~ AV 1&023 m 14 taros "ff ,60x6 N 1-M m I I =97M. nb. 17-013 17012 i I E_ - - r'~-> j~1 002 17011 I ! 1. eo - 17-010 Z? ~-I1p1 ap eo, I A{Y 17-009 m I- _ 1&087 1&000 I rvp 1]OO FFF"'t].O3] 1~~ -1 g' 3 tS0884S~Vy~~'G 'KI 17-014 L .a ,0 ! 1]615 m I 1 , R 1700& N f]C04 17 W3 a 1]W2 $ 1]031 1 t 0085 iS~1 17016 17 .17 1701 ' se,°' ! ar '3Y 1&062 -Ir oe' 7 y ~j~ ~ n - 3&063 Y N Y 1S0 `f 1] 020 . e oz7u 'I 1&054 'fry - ! 17TA_ I ez.e 1]oz1 022 n 17-MB g~ 623 n-oza nazs 17-MB n Pl. aJ sle' ]900 PP' 9. 9 J k~ \ -_-STS"' ~1S0761 1&013 U1"12 n OR- &0 ~ _rt' 1b01t87~ _ _ _ _ \ I Darg>7-~- 1-0,0 FI 1&0]4 1m]° taOW a \ \ r PB _ / 1a[OB ; 15073 ] j's I! 1S0 y 1 yl~ %xP I,, yC 1&a0] g 1aW6 16005. laW4 ~ 14N9 e 16002 16031 ]2 g4 --ta 115 be \yyy... ° 16014 - 1&015 q,5, I I I' '-F" 3i et 1SOBfi ygYYY~vvv"' IB018 / .A, m]0- KN yofW ]e5a 1roe 0035' it ] I R 16017 lfi~gg W 5 1 l _5 az r fa019 .'A. _ ,5069 - r_ It e' IJ~a~ 1&020 --36(61.. ta022ta023SJt6014 ~1&02s. 16026 w 1e-oz7$ is Ism, - 1s070 : \y \\Sy~.- I PPm'1 4 • I noeoZ yYY R1~ 3 _ 2am5 ._.77THAYE- - - - - I _ na m3 1 1s0. 1x2,,,1 I 'A51fti '-IB1. 1 _ 1 4010& a" g 20003 ,°s M'1 ! t4W9 r61 " "1m 1&058 +4W8° 14WY° 14 1403510 0514W0 1403$°' 14W2-- f&0]i iS05> 8 J- __$.r_ $ iS05 - 1&056 Q'y°µ iS~O _ 1 ]P 20.N6 14612 r PP PI ° 9W ]]50,~ 0 ° 0 Y 033°' - - 12b1 ` I'm P'11g q,p, Ielf~)1 BPCNB.{' o- I° I IB>M m' 1 \ ~ Bi.xb III at 6tlp VV 06 pJ$ 101 1 e 26002 m +4013 11014 m0 16015 " t4016m 4.4 '1401]m ',4010 14019w 't4@Om -t4M1 14022m 26007 _ - gg - 1&O.SY° 1&053 1&052 ts051 ~o isos0 OS 02 9 04-049 B anzh 15330' L Ofi _ 1 05-031 - µs 68A - ~ e 0.5-090 04-049 (1 . 0' 15330' i m « -05-021 05-030 - 05-034 04-049 05-023 I 04-049 WHEAT IDGE '6171' 3' 7T 15231• 170.21' It8701')~_ 332.] 3' 16001' 168.51' 160.81' 1 - I - _J - - - 1 I e ! E/' I W V m p9 07-ao1 05-065 - ? M20291 112580 • - 69 ' X a V ~1) p2s ao ) _ - 122.51 .7 p7-. 1 N 07-061 30' 21 12550' 1 (12220) 06088 (12 30'1 _(12550) J 159.70' 1 0 ,2550' p 050') L12550] 1169]01 u 0 _001 07-001 05 067 659•) _ 6' m - 07-00 5-054 r ~,qy o - 17026 0 001 0 side 8 - - 59 07030) Y 1 50• 12550 v\ ~ 06068 ! 112 so') (12550') 5". 1 i 07- 1 07001 1 170.80' 120 0' 112559 V 0 1 05-055 . (120 9) %v ax(12550 II ~ 07- 1 07-0 I 05-069 1205 125 0' 171 50' I1205 550) 07-001 7-001 71 56) ..J _ (120.20 5.50' 160.60' 07 e05 064 05 064 W5 064' 001 07-001 5t O~w . - - N - 66-666 Appli - -66- ! d 0&006 I 06-008 6-009 '03.83' 06056 (123.70) (122.3W) n2.50' ' 0 06.OOZ % a G601 0&005 ' (123.80') 122.20 '34.70 - _ Ij 142.50' I 06-006 011 OS-057 12381- 1 .21 08-004 1 ' ! 012 06 w 14130 ' 135 23' 4]50 M005 - mol I 123.]0`) 122]0' ' - side Mb m 05-078 956•, 135 80' 123.]0') 122.30 . 06-003 -014 08-002 06069 N 05-061 !I 1z4.o6' 1zz.on - i ' 13230 (13620' I l i 06-0160 W017 n06-018 OB-015 163.H' 15 231' 33 - - - raq , - a F 05-065 m.oo1 o]-001 3 ! 12020 125. , \9' - 02020) 025901 _ 122.51 u 07-001 a 07-001 ' 0' 1 12550 02220 1 21 13x) ( (1255x1 osofifi 07-x01 07-001 +ss io' +m W' ss0' . 020.0) 02s s01 (169]0) 07-001 07-Wi OS67 12050' y (125.20•) W m ' 07-001 05-054 " 0]-001 r 0] " sine ro side S b I170301 tzo 16' 125 sa OS~9 ! (120 `A) 112650'1 1. 07-001 07-001 110.00' I 12050' 12s 50' 05 055 f oo0 07 001 - _ - - 0S- 9 1205a 12550' t]150' 112050'1 1125501 0] 001 _ 0].001 m - (1715x) O' (+zo z6' +z5so' 13 +06.50' g 16091' y05-064 05-064 05-064 APP' 9 9 _ _ _ _ - 06 0 - W008 00-009 !13 1123.)0 "1 223V 63 , _ OS056 I 0 0& ' VR.50' C q 007 OB 06010 O&M5 _ - I I 123.60' 122.20 1 139.>0' j (16250 li 0&006 0&011 _ 0& 1R3 BI' 12221 0&000 OSO$] p+ ' 161.0. 06005 _ 06012 0 W (161.30 "O- 13523 123.]0' (122.30' p Q C 3 - SI 05-078 I ' +ni°• 12290' i35 W 06.003 06014 08-002 0 $ 06059 05-061 126.00 122.00' ' m it z0' I u236 1 0 - 13620' p `L... i _ y08-016: 0601/1] x0601 8 1°06019 06-015 OSO8] o / p' 1 ti3 B0' ! 702a 8530' 8150 1 00 50' 123.30' 101.]0' 1 166.00' 12 0' 16]70 16600' - roo T oS032 01001 03-001 03001 01001 01001 03-001 03001 Oz-011 02-012 02-016 06003 OS001 L E WOOD I I a1-o0s 01-010 01-011 01.012 01-013 1-0 01-014 05-036 05-030 I 06-115 05-036 05-034 37 ' ' ~ 05-054 Vail 81%"' & W roc 23 2. ' V . 05-071 05072 160. - 60.01' o no 05073 \ $ 05-074 1 ~ \ (167.501 01 _ _ _ ` 1fi0.21' 160.37 - - . 05-030 y. 05053 ~ (133.50' I - nfis6' i 05039 1 , 05058 134M' X 05-052 i 05-040 n7e nnl ~ i 05057 05-031 05-064 R 05-064 05-042 70bLl~ 7 ce H ub 05-063 OS 135.80' ` , 135.50' ~ ~I y\/l 05048 i ososs 05-061 650 05 090 11221DI 0506 169] 11691 (1719 LY scle 05-055 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) owner :Applewood Baptist Churc h Parcel : 022669 Site :11200 W 32nd Ave Lakewo od 80033 _ Xfered : 11/24/1961 Mail :11200 W 32nd Ave Lakewo od Cc 80033 Price Use :9159 Exempt,Church,Land Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: l YB:1960 Pool: B1dgSF: 26,108 Ac:2 .80 * ; MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) ' owner :Larkin Michael W Parcel : 048245 Site :3187 Robb Cir Denver 80 215 Xfered : 07/28/1995 Mail :3187 Robb Cir Denver Co 80215 Price : $144,000 Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1964 Pool: BldgSF: 1,338 Ac:. 27 : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Wondra Phillip C Parcel : 048262 Site :11289 W 30th Ave Lakewo od 80215 Xfered : 07/10/1996 Mail :11289 W 30th Ave Lakewo od Co 80215 Price : $180,500 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1961 Pool: B1dgSF: 2,236 Ac:. 31 * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) owner :Pritt Jeffrey Parcel : 048269 Site :3197 Robb Cir Lakewood 80215 Xfered : 06/17/1994 Mail :3197 Robb Cir Lakewood Cc 80215 Price : $139,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1962 Pool: B1dgSF: 1,671 Ac:. 31 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Odom John A Jr Parcel : 048274 Site :11490 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :06/08/1978 Mail :11490 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :4133 Agr,Mountain Meado w Phone Bedrm: 5 Bath:4.7S TotRm: YB:1901 Pool: B1dgSF :5,076 Ac:8 .16 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Howard Margaret S Parcel :048278 Site :3046 Robb Cir Lakewood 80215 Xfered :12/17/1999 Mail :3046 Robb Cir Lakewood Co 80215 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1961 Pool: BldgSF :1,650 Ac:. 26 * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Langen Raymond E Parcel :048284 Site :3067 Robb Cir Lakewood 80215 Xfered Mail :3067 Robb Cir Lakewood Co 80215 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1960 Pool: B1dgSF :1,930 Ac:. 24 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Mckay James E Parcel :048285 Site :3078 Robb Cir Lakewood 80215 Xfered :08/07/1985 Mail :3078 Robb Cir Lakewood Co 80215 Price :$132,500 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm :3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1962 Pool: BldgSF :2,510 Ac:. 29 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Mc Nassor Warren T Parcel :048291 Site :3099 Robb Cir Lakewood 80215 Xfered Mail :3099 Robb Cir Lakewood Co 80215 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone :303-238-0175 Bedrm :3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1960 Pool: B1dgSF :1,616 Ac:. 23 • Met=Scan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Danaher Cindy M Parcel :048296 Site :3095 Quail St Lakewood 80215 Xfered :08/07/2003 Mail :3095 Quail St Lakewood Co 80215 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm :4 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1968 Pool: BldgSF :1,990 Ac:. 22 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Leprino Nyla B Parcel :048298 Site :3049 Robb Cir Lakewood 80215 - Xfered :02/01/2005 Mail :3049 Robb Cir Lakewood Co 80215 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm :3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1961 Pool: B1dgSF :2,536 Ac:. 23 Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Perry Alvan S Trustee Parcel : 048305 Site :3062 Robb Cir Lakewood 80215 Xfered : 02/26/2001 Mail :2020 S Monroe St #302 Denver Cc 80210 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1961 Pool: B1dgSF: 1,453 Ac:. 34 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Broccio Joseph S Parcel : 048309 Site :3137 Robb Cir Lakewood 80215 Xfered : 01/06/1998 Mail :2895 Robb Cir Lakewood Cc 80215 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1961 Pool: B1dgSF: 1,821 Ac:. 23 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Wood Paul R Parcel : 048312 Site :3045 Quail St Lakewood 80215 Xfered : 11/25/1998 Mail :3045 Quail St Lakewood Cc 80215 Price : $199,900 Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1965 Pool: B1dgSF: 2,034 Ac:. 19 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Case Jason/Tracy Parcel : 048322 Site :3159 Robb Cir Lakewood 80215 Xfered : 05/27/2005 Mail :3159 Robb Cir Lakewood Co 80215 Price : $290,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1963 Pool: B1dgSF: 1,685 Ac:. 24 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Hamilton Clare C Parcel : 048323 Site :11264 W 31st Ave Lakewood 80215 - Xfered : 11/30/1994 Mail :11264 W 31st Ave Lakewood Cc 80215 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone : 303-234-9065 Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1964 Pool: BidgSF: 1,579 Ac:. 27 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Bond E T III Parcel : 048330 Site :3253 Pierson St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :10/22/1997 Mail :3253 Pierson St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$155,000 Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone :303-238-2745 Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1966 Pool: B1dgSF :1,483 Ac:. 21 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Atchison Richard N Parcel :048331 Site :3273 Pierson St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered Mail :12115 W 29th PI Lakewood Co 80215 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1967 Pool: B1dgSF :2,600 Ac:. 21 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Jeppesen John C Parcel :048332 Site :3274 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :04/26/2004 Mail :3274 Quail St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price :$270,500 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1980 Pool: B1dgSF :1,923 Ac: .21 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Schleusner Joee Ann Parcel :048333 Site :3254 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :06/02/2003 Mail :3254 Quail St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1975 Pool: B1dgSF :2,733 Ac: .21 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Riedel Gary L Parcel :048353 Site :11553 W 31st Pl Lakewood 80215 Xfered :07/09/2002 Mail :11553 W 31st P1 Lakewood Co 80215 Price :$269,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone :303-232-5757 Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1964 Pool: BidgSF :1,689 Ac: .27 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Mulligan Gene J Parcel :048357 Site :3024 Routt Cir Lakewood 80215 Xfered Mail :3024 Routt Cir Lakewood Cc 80215 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm :5 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1960 Pool: B1dgSF :1,518 Ac: .31 information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Elson Clifford R Parcel : 048360 Site :11555 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered : 08/29/1996 Mail :11555 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price : $70,000 Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 2 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1924 Pool: B1dgSF: 1,122 Ac: .31 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :James Timothy A Parcel : 048378 Site :3223 Pierson St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered : 11/21/2000 Mail :3223 Pierson St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1964 Pool: B1dgSF: 1,315 Ac: .20 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Cress Paul Michael Parcel : 048379 Site :3224 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered : 10/25/2004 Mail :3224 Quail St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price : $220,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone : .303-274-7590 Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 Tot Rm: YB:1977 Pool: B1dgSF: 1,604 Ac: .20 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Emge John W;+ Parcel : 048391 Site :3342 Simms St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered : 10/11/1988 Mail :3342 Simms St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1972 Pool: B1dgSF: 1,800 Ac: .22 * ; MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Willmarth Barry Parcel : 048399 Site :3047 Routt Cir Lakewood 80215 Xfered : 06/25/1999 Mail :3047 Routt Cir Lakewood Co 80215 Price : $195,000 Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Sedrm: 3 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1960 Pool: B1dgSF: 1,305 Ac: .30 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Wells Paul W Parcel : 048434 Site :3362 Simms St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered : 01/16/2003 Mail :16546 W 79th Dr Arvada Co 80007 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1964 Pool: B1dgSF: 1,539 Ac: .22 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Sugai Wilfred M;+ Parcel : 048439 Site :11158 W 33rd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered : 04/20/1994 Mail :11158 W 33rd Ave Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price : $150,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1968 Pool: B1dgSF: 1,748 Ac: .22 * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Applewood Knolls Swim & Tennis Club Inc Parcel : 048448 Site :11520 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered Mail :PO Box 1741 Wheat Ridge Co 80034 Price Use :2112 Com,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF: Ac: * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Constelloe Declan/Ann-marie Parcel : 048450 Site :2994 Routt Cir Denver 80215 Xfered : 05/30/2000 Mail :2994 Routt Cir Denver Cc 80215 Price : $252,000 Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1961 Pool: B1dgSF: 1,420 Ac: .32 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Baxter Glenneta M Life Estate Et Al Parcel : 048459 Site :3084 Routt Cir Lakewood 80215 Xfered : 10/18/1984 Mail :PO Box 1405 Dubois Wy 82513 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1961 Pool: B1dgSF: 1,458 Ac: .25 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Beun Lana J Parcel : 048460 Site :2997 Routt Cir Lakewood 80215 - Xfered : 12/06/2002 Mail :2997 Routt Cir Lakewood Co 80215 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.50 TotRm: YB:1960 Pool: B1dgSF: 1,609 Ac: .27 Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Knight Roger E Parcel : 048480 Site :3370 Simms St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered : 06/18/2003 Mail :1800 Washington Ave Golden Co 80401 Price Use :1111 Vacant,Residential Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF: AC:1 .00 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Lucas David M Parcel : 048488 Site :3220 Routt St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered : 11/26/1985 Mail :3220 Routt St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price : $42,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1985 Pool: B1dgSF: 2,607 Ac:. 30 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Archer Jeffrey D Parcel : 048490 Site :11502 W 31st P1 Lakewood 80215 Xfered : 08/23/2002 Mail :11502 W 31st 21 Lakewood Co 80215 Price : $246,500 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1960 Pool: B1dgSF: 2,438 Ac:. 28 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Logan Etha L Parcel : 048516 Site :3087 Routt Cir Lakewood 80215 Xfered : 01/27/1992 Mail :3087 Routt Cir Lakewood Co 80215 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1960 Pool: B1dgSF: 2,211 Ac:. 27 ; MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Schroeder Gary L Parcel : 048520 Site :11575 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered : 01/02/2002 Mail :12600 W Auburn Ave Lakewood Co 80228 Price : $175,000 Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 2 Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1920 Pool: B1dgSF: 1,427 Ac:. 30 * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Perri Ralph J II Parcel : 048540 Site :*no Site Address* Xfered : 12/31/1984 Mail :1090 Holland St Lakewood Co 80215 Price Use :1111 Vacant,Residential Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF: Ac:3 .77 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Eastman Jack W Parcel : 048550 Site :2987 Routt Cir Lakewood 80215 Xfered : 06/14/1972 Mail :2987 Routt Cir Lakewood Co 80215 Price : $33,600 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1961 Pool: B1dgSF :1,974 Ac:. 31 * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner Laura E Parcel :048554 Site :11511 W 29th Pl Lakewood 80215 - Xfered :05/05/2003 Mail :11511 W 29th P1 Lakewood Co 80215. Price :$250,500 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 2 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1961 Pool: B1dgSF :1,426 Ac:. 31 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Mitchell Scott Parcel :048575 Site :3252 Simms St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :07/03/2002 Mail :3252 Simms St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$240,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1964 Pool: B1dgSF :2,062 Ac:. 42 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Post Edwin V Parcel :048584 Site :2984 Routt Cir Lakewood 80215 Xfered Mail :2984 Routt Cir Lakewood Cc 80215 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:3.00 TotRm: YB:1960 Pool: B1dgSF :2,282 Ac:. 32, MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Rodricks Bette Jean Parcel :048587 Site :3322 Simms St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered Mail :3322 Simms St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm :2 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1963 Pool : B1dgSF :1,859 Ac:. 23. Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Seidel Timothy R Parcel :048607 Site :3272 Simms St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :09/27/1996 Mail :3272 Simms St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price :$135,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone . - Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1963 Pool: B1dgSF Ac:. :1,578 23 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • owner :Peters John C Parcel :048618 Site :11481 W 29th 21 Lakewood 80215 Xfered :05/12/1972 Mail :11481 W 29th Pl Lakewood Cc 80215 Price :$33,800 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1962 Pool: B1dgSF :1,471 Ac:. 33 * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Mlatecek Dawn Parcel :048651 Site :11595 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :08/29/2005 Mail :11595 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$244,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 2 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1954 Pool: B1dgSF :1,223 Ac:. 33 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Odom John A Jr Parcel :048837 Site :11440 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :03/02/1992 Mail :11490 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price :$400,000 Use :4133 Agr,Mountain Meadow Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1899 Pool: BldgSF :1,214 Ac:8 .72 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Green Carol D - Parcel :049188 Site :11254 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :09/07/2005 Mail :11254 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: l Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1950 Pool: BldgSF :2,151 Ac:1 .88 * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Turner Jerry B Parcel :049234 Site :11256 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered Mail :11256 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1964 Pool: B1dgSF :1,617 Ac:4 .39 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner Owner :Burk Phillip A/Burk Betty J Parcel :065838 Site :3025 Quail St Lakewood 80215 Xfered :01/23/1992 Mail :3025 Quail St Lakewood Cc 80215 Price :$1081900 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land - Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1965 Pool: BldgSF :1,802 Ac:. 20 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Jarvis Gregory A Parcel :065877 Site :3293 Pierson St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :01/24/2000 Mail :3293 Pierson St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price :$173,000 Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1966 Pool: B1dgSF :2,088 Ac:. 20 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Pruyn John Patrick Jr Parcel :066625 Site :3292 Simms St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :07/31/1992 Mail :3292 Simms St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$90,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1967 Pool: BidgSF :1,007 Ac: * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Bartoletti Properties Llp Parcel :066720 Site :11157 W 31st Ave Lakewood 80215 Xfered :07/18/2002 Mail :11157 W 31st Ave Lakewood Co 80215 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm :4 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1969 Pool: BldgSF :2,010 Ac:. 28 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Hart Elizabeth A Parcel :066817 Site :3327 Pierson St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :10/03/1995 Mail :3327 Pierson St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price :$136,650 Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone :303-237-3787 Bedrm :3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1968 Pool: B1dgSF :1,252 Ac:. 21 Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Shanon James R/Shannon D Jo Parcel : 066818 Site :11108 W 33rd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered : 08/17/1993 Mail :11108 W 33rd Ave Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price : $129,950 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1968 Pool: B1dgSF: 1,534 Ac:. 21 * - MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Hock Linda J Parcel : 066819 Site :3294 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered : 06/19/1992 Mail :3294 Quail St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1968 Pool: B1dgSF: 1,578 Ac:. 20 * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Roehl Robert A Parcel : 066961 Site :3065 Quail St Lakewood 80215 Xfered : 09/01/2005 Mail :3065 Quail St Lakewood Cc 80215 Price : $265,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1967 Pool: B1dgSF: 1,998 Ac:. 19 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • owner :Hart Madeline D Parcel : 068258 Site :10968 W 31st Ave Lakewood 80215 Xfered : 08/07/2001 Mail :10968 W 31st Ave Lakewood Co 80215 Price Use :1112 Res,lmproved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1968 Pool: B1dgSF: 2,351 Ac: .22 * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Miller Thomas R Parcel : 070590 Site :11590 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered : 11/15/1985 Mail :11590 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price : $127,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1984 Pool: B1dgSF: 2,124 Ac: .27 * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Black Raymond L Parcel : 070643 Site :10991 W 30th Pl Lakewood 80215 Xfered : 04/15/1983 Mail :10991 W 30th P1 Lakewood Cc 80215 Price : $142,900 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone : Bedrm: 4 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1968 Pool: BldgSF: 2,094 Ac: * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Johnson Freeman Any F Parcel : 070653 Site :3086 Parfet Dr Lakewood 80215 Xfered : 08/08/2001 Mail :3086 Parfet Dr Lakewood Cc 80215 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1969 Pool: B1dgSF: 2,013 Ac: .33 * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Rohr Sylvester P Parcel : 070666 Site :3298 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered Mail :3298 Quail St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1972 Pool: B1dgSF: 2,413 Ac: .21 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Derstler Charlotte V Parcel : 070693 Site :11038 W 31st Ave Lakewood 80215 Xfered : 08/14/1996 Mail :11038 W 31st Ave Lakewood Co 80215 Price : $142,500 Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.50 TotRm: YB:1969 Pool: B1dgSF: 1,770 Ac: .23 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Buth Craig Stephen Parcel : 070694 Site :11057 W 31st Ave Lakewood 80215 Xfered : 09/11/2000 Mail :11057 W 31st Ave Lakewood Co 80215 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1968 Pool: B1dgSF :2,153 Ac: .28 • MetroScan-/ Jefferson (CO) Owner :Gamble Wallis S Parcel :070695 Site :11068 W 31st Ave Lakewood 80215 Xfered :06/17/1994 Mail :11068 W 31st Ave Lakewood Cc 80215 Price :$194,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm :4 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1968 Pool: B1dgSF :2,456 Ac: .2E Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Paddock Susan Trust Parcel : 070769 Site :11027 W 31st Ave Lakewood 80215 Xfered : 12/04/2001 Mail :11027 W 31st Ave Lakewood Co 80215 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1968 Pool: B1dgSF: 2,065 Ac:. 31 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Patrick Rodney J Parcel : 070814 Site :11435 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered Mail :11435 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.50 TotRm: YB:1932 Pool: B1dgSF: 1,285 Ac:1 .09 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Droullard Emerson K Parcel : 071815 Site :11560 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered : 05/21/2002 Mail :11560 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 2 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1969 Pool: B1dgSF: 1,537 Ac:. 27 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :AStuno Rocco D Jr Trust The Parcel : 071816 Site :3154 Routt St Lakewood 80215 Xfered : 04/05/1995 Mail :3154 Routt St Lakewood Co 80215 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1969 Pool: Yes B1dgSF: 1,662 Ac:. 27 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Scott Millicent A/George B D Parcel : 071894 Site :3184 Routt St Lakewood 80215 Xfered : 06/18/1993 Mail :188 Chippewa Cir Henrietta Ny 14467 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1969 Pool: B1dgSF :2,240 Ac:. 28 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Cole David R Parcel :074379 Site :3050 Quail St Lakewood 80215 Xfered Mail :3050 Quail St Lakewood Cc 80215 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1969 Pool: B1dgSF :1,999 Ac:. 33 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Willson Fred B Family Trust Parcel :074397 Site :11127 W 31st Ave Lakewood 80215 Xfered :08/26/2005 Mail- :PO Box 83 Manville Wy 82227 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1969 Pool: B1dgSF :1,759 Ac:. 25 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Prebis Walter J Parcel :074398 Site :3060 Quail St Lakewood 80215 Xfered :09/29/1993 Mail :3060 Quail St Lakewood Co 80215 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm :3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1969 Pool: B1dgSF :1,824 Ac:. 20 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :McCartney Ronald D Parcel :074399 Site :11158 W 31st Ave Lakewood 80215 Xfered :04/06/1999 Mail :11158 W 31st Ave Lakewood Co 80215 Price :$255,000 Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm :4 Bath:2.75 TotRm: YB:1969 Pool: B1dgSF :2,286 Ac:. 26 * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Hansen Carl L Parcel :085997 Site :3054 Routt Cir Lakewood 80215 Xfered :05/10/1999 Mail :3054 Routt Cir Lakewood Co 80215 Price :$242,000 Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm :4 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1961 Pool : B1dgSF :1,245 Ac: .27 : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Baker Hugh Eugene Parcel :087420 Site :10957 W 31st Ave Lakewood 80215 Xfered :03/21/1974 Mail :10957 W 31st Ave Lakewood Co 80215 Price :$51,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm :3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1968 Pool : B1dgSF :2,422 Ac: .32 Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Marcello Anthony R Parcel : 088558 Site :3241 Routt St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered : 02/13/1990 Mail :3241 Routt St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price : $40,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:3.25 TotRm: YB:1991 Pool: B1dgSF: 2,145 Ac:. 40 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Ficco Louis J Parcel : 136197 Site :11340 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered : 05/04/1989 Mail :3650 Vance St #1 Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :5112 Res,Apartment,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm:3 YB:1979 Pool: B1dgSF: 28,504 Ac:4.42 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) ' Owner :Otoole James P/Adele M Parcel : 136382 Site :3495 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered : 09/08/1989 Mail :3495 Quail St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price : $207,500. Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:3.00 TotRm: YB:1979 Pool: BidgSF: 3,031 Ac: • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Sares Mark A Parcel : 136383 Site :3455 Quail St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered : 09/26/2002 Mail :3455 Quail St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price : $497,900 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 6 Bath:3.75 TotRm: YB:1977 Pool: B1dgSF: 3,009 Ac: * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Gibbard Arthur A Parcel : 136384 Site :3415 Quail St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered : 07/29/2002 Mail :3415 Quail St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:3.25 TotRm: YB:1977 Pool: B1dgSF: 2,490 Ac: MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Scezney Jerome F Parcel : 136385 Site :3395 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered : 04/04/1997 Mail :3395 Quail St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$325,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:2.75 TotRm: YB:1976 Pool: B1dgSF :2,816 Ac: : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Hill Leila J Parcel :136386 Site :3345 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :06/20/1983 Mail :3345 Quail St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:3.00 TotRm: YB:1976 Pool: Yes B1dgSF :3,034 Ac: * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Applewcod Baptist Church Parcel :151122 Site :11225 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :09/28/1993 Mail :11200 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price Use :9159 Exempt,Church,Land Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm:l YB:1984 Pool: B1dgSF :26,535 Ac: 14.76 : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Wright Ernest A Parcel :174511 Site :3240 Routt St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :03/25/1994 Mail :3240 Routt St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price :$214,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm :4 Bath:3.00 TotRm: YB:1987 Pool: B1dgSF :2,264 Ac: .31 * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Archer Dolores F Parcel :174512 Site :3260 Routt St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :01/16/2002 Mail :3260 Routt St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm :3 Bath:3.00 TotRm:- YB:1985 Pool: B1dgSF :2,274 Ac: .36 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Craven Anthony K Parcel :174513 a P Site :3280 Routt St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :03/24/1999 ( Mail :3280 Routt St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$349,000 Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm :5 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1988 Pool : B1dgSF :2,369 Ac: .47 information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) owner :Cellars Virginia B Parcel : 174514 Site :3310 Routt St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered : 04/29/1999 Mail :3310 Routt St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1994 Pool: B1dgSF: 2,976 Ac:2.34 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) ' Owner :Moss David Wayne Parcel : 174515 M Site :3221 Routt St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered : 04/25/2003 Mail :3221 Routt St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1987 Pool: BidgSF: 1,610 Ac: .31 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) ' Owner :Chesley Duane P Parcel : 174516 Site :3261 Routt St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered : 01/25/1996 Mail :3261 Routt St ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1989 Pool: B1dgSF: 2,412 Ac: .40 * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) ' Owner :Nielsen Jeffrey,C Parcel : 174517 Site :3281 Routt St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered : 08/10/2000 Mail :3281 Routt St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:3.00 TotRm: YB:1984 Pool: B1dgSF: 2,621 Ac: .40 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) ' Owner :Casados Ross Jr Parcel : 174518 Site :3291 Routt St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered : 07/26/1990 Mail :3291 Routt St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price : $155,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1985 Pool: B1dgSF: 2,826 Ac: .39 : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) ' Owner :Jefferson County School District R-1 Parcel : 176990 Site :3400 Pierson St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered : 04/15/1966 Mail :1829 Denver West Dr Golden Co 80401 Price Use :9139 Exempt,County,Land Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm:l YB:1967 Pool: B1dgSF: 45,361 Ac: 10.56 : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) ' - Owner :Digiacomo David R Parcel : 200432 Site :3275 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered : 12/20/2001 Mail :3275 Quail St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm :4 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1981 Pool: B1dgSF :2,774 Ac: 2.27 * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) ' Owner :Swainson Shawn ?/Cathy A Parcel :200433 Site :3204 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :12/01/1999 Mail :3204 Quail St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$166,900 Full Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm :3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1964 Pool: B1dgSF :1,381 Ac: .25 * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) ' Owner :Hartline Harbert A Parcel :200436 Site :11151 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :09/28/1993 Mail :11151 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm :3 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1963 Pool: B1dgSF :1,984 Ac: .26 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Turner Louise Et Al Parcel :201143 Site :11100 W 38th Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :12/16/2002 Mail :5393 Maggie Ln Evergreen Cc 80439 Price Use :4141 Agr,Grazing Land Phone Bedrm :2 Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1922 Pool: B1dgSF :968 Ac: 11.98 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Casados Rodney J Parcel :201827 Site :3201 Routt St Wheat Ridge 80033 - Xfered :10/22/2003 Mail :3201 Routt St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$355,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm :4 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1984 Pool: B1dgSF :3,039 Ac: .34 Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Klamm er Peter F Parcel : 201900 Site :3200 Routt St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered : 03/15/1996 Mail :3200 Routt St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price : $280,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 4 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1984 Pool: B1dgSF: 3,190 Ac:. 39 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Leno Llc Parcel : 208264 Site :3203 Pierson St #APPRO Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered : 03/11/2004 Mail :15947 W Ellsworth Ln Golden Co 80401 Price Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1967 Pool: B1dgSF: 1,861 Ac:. 25 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Kidder Deborah L Parcel : 413637 Site :3400 Simms St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered : 11/19/1993 Mail :3370 Simms St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price : $238,000 Use :1155 Vacant,Residential Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: BldgSF: Ac:. 47 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Knigh t Roger E Parcel : 413638 Site :3430 Simms St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered : 06/18/2003 Mail :1800 Washington Ave Golden Cc 80401 Price Use :1111 Vacant,Residential Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: BldgSF: Ac:. 64 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Dmk Investment Company Parcel : 413639 Site :3370 Simms St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered : 11/23/1993 Mail :120 S Riverside Plz Chicago 11 60606 Price : $170,000 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 6 Bath:2.75 TotRm: YB:1976 Pool: B1dgSF: 4,076 Ac:. 45 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : owner :Knig ht Roger E Parcel : 413640 Site :3331 Routt St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :06/23/2003 Mail :1800 Washington Ave Golden Cc 80401 Price Use :1129 Res,Improved Outbuilding Land Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB:1976 Pool: BldgSF : Ac:. 42 * : MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Cook William C Parcel :420133 Site :3595 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :12/05/2003 Mail :3595 Quail St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$329,150 Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone Bedrm: 3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1999 Pool: BldgSF :1,642 Ac: .16 * • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Cook William C Parcel :420134 Site :3595 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :12/05/2003 Mail :3595 Quail St Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 Price :$329,150 Use :1155 Vacant,Residential Phone Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: BldgSF : Ac: .07 • MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Must offa Jill A Parcel :436080 Site :3615 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :08/20/2004 Mail :3615 Quail St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$125,000 Use :1155 Vacant,Residential Phone Bedrm Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: BldgSF : Ac: .43 MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) • Owner :Cook William C Parcel :436081 Site :3595 Quail St Wheat Ridge 80033 Xfered :12/05/2003 Mail :3595 Quail St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$329,150 Use :1155 Vacant,Residential Phone Bedrm : Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: BldgSF : Ac: .06 * MetroScan / Jefferson (CO) : Owner :Nard i Ardalan Parcel :436082 Site :*no Site Address* Xfered :03/09/2001 Mail :3615 Quail St Wheat Ridge Co 80033 Price :$50,000 Use :1111 Vacant,Residential Phone Bedrm : Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool : BldgSF : Ac: .09 Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Metroscan / Jefferson (CO) Owner :Gimeno Frederick E Site :*no Site Address* Mail :1628 Ogden St Denver Co 80218 Use :1111 Vacant,Residential Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: Parcel :447517 Xfered :03/29/2005 Price :$160,000 Phone B1dgSF: Ac:.71 Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. a w 3 2 ~z z N M 1 A lewood Baptist Church C O N C R P T U A L SITE. PLAN WHEAT R [ D C L' COLORADO a, 114h. 2M6 POUWh ASSOCIATES. INC. A'.ll wm w u uu Scale: L' = 40' mmmmmmmmwm~ a CTTY OF WWEAT RIDGE 09/07/05 11.5A AM CIA APPLEWOOD BAPTIST RECEIPT NnaC 24i. Oh AM! 114T FMSK) IOWINC APPLD'ATION F 200,00 70IgF PAYMENT RECEIVED AMAHkff CK 28657 200,.00 IOIAL 200,00 POUW&ASSOCIATES, INC. 190 East 9" Avenue, Suite 250 Denver, Colorado 80203 303-2964343 fax 303-296-9172 Date: September 8, 2005 Re: Applewood Baptist Church - New Education Building 11200 West 32nd Avenue, Wheatridge, CO 80033. Dear Sir: Please find enclosed six copies of our site plan showing the proposed Classroom Building. As the new architect, we have maintained the building in exactly the same location as has been shown to you and the neighborhood before. We believe that this is good site planning as it hides the majority of the parking area behind the proposed building. We have redesigned the parking lot to the south of the new building, so that we have two rows of landscaping in addition to the landscaping adjacent to west 32nd, to screen the cars from view. We have made some refinements in the grading and the landscaping next to the building that will improve the function and design of the project. We also want to subdivide the property to allow low density residential development on the north portion of the property. For this reason we would like to reserve a 30 foot strip of land on the west side of the property for access road R.O.W. dedication at the appropriate time. The site plan has the necessary notes that explain our concept in detail. We are still refining that detention area size and location towards the north side of the property. We appreciate your input in this pre-application meeting. Sincerely, POUW&ASSOCIATES, INC. ?Sey S. Pouw President A r c h i t e c t u r e + P I a n n i n g + I n t e r i o r s APR. 3.2006 2:19PM MEIVI~ORANDUM VIA FACSIMILE M0.434 P.1 POUW & ASSOCIATES, INC 190 East 9th Avenue, suite 250, Denver, CO 80203. P303 296 4343 / F. 303 296 9172 TO: MGVM 7 Vl RQ,cP,d f FROM: ~O{A lA~ SUBJECT: DATE: CC.: PROJECT NO: FAKNO. ~O ~v 2 S v~ NO OF PAGES: i Nts, is ace oY ~ r ~ ~Fwr~ APR. 3.2006 2:19PM APPKEWOOD NO.434 ' P.2- 26392 t < . CITY pr.'CilML,A`RID~ , at, 08/,0Rc1? All APTAE. JOCD AAPTTST faMCT.r'T tdn.CO'I:'f660 ' i Ar9caui~r 100,00 7 liNl F 4!1 P. "`i1ITl5 AFf'I,ICAI „ ~pP!E RF.CC719ED AI1DUt•IT. p 100,00 U. 3G'?^ 4GTAL 7Yv.0o.nn APR. 3.2006 2:20PM P N0.434 P.3 alp Applevaood Baptist Church Check Request sqo -3ZO Date Submitted: Date Check Required: Pay to: Please Address: I attach receipts on back city: , st: Zip: D3 of form Telephone: /y S- Internet Address: MinistryAcc unt# , Item Description/Use Amount e 6fE $00/awv LO Total Spec~al^lnstru;ctions, T ~t re.1 4V ~t `fu T Signature of F}erson submitted r t: Approval signature: * Please obtain approval for amounts over $100. Chelcks are printed once a week and approved requests must be in the financial office by 4 pm on Tuesday to be processed this week. ABCadminrorms,xlp rev. 14-W City of Wheat Ridge of W"EqT Community Development Department Pm Memorandum ~~C OR A00 TO: Alan White Steve Nguyen Meredith Reckert Dave Brossman Travis Crane Tim Paranto Chad Root FROM:: Jeff Hir6~r SUBJECT: 9/29 Pre-Application Meeting DATE: September 12, 2005 One pre-application meeting is scheduled for Thursday, September 29, 2005. At 2:00, Stanley Pouw of Pouw and Associates is the applicant for the property located at 11200 West 32nd Avenue (Applewood Baptist). Please see attached narrative and plans. POUW&ASSOCIATES, INC. 190 East 9" Avenue, Suite 250 Denver, Colorado 80203 303.296-4343 fax 303-296-9172 Date: September 8, 2005 Re: Applewood Baptist Church - New Education Building 11200 West 32nd Avenue, Wheatridge, CO 80033. Dear Sir: Please find enclosed six copies of our site plan showing the proposed Classroom Building. As the new architect, we have maintained the building in exactly the same location as has been shown to you and the neighborhood before. We believe that this is good site planning as it hides the majority of the parking area behind the proposed building. We have redesigned the parking lot to the south of the new building, so that we have two. rows of landscaping in addition to the landscaping adjacent to west 32nd, to screen the cars from view. We have made some refinements in the grading and the landscaping next to the building that will improve the function and design of the project. We also want to subdivide the property to allow low density residential development on the north portion of the property. For this reason we would like to reserve a 30 foot strip of land on the west side of the property for access road R.O.W. dedication at the appropriate time. The site plan has the necessary notes that explain our concept in detail. We are still refining that detention area size and location towards the north side of the property. We appreciate your input in this pre-application meeting. A r c h i t e c t u r e + P I a n n i n g + I n t e r i o r s Sincerely, POUW&ASSOCIATES, INC. - F,w-,'. ,~F% t,~ ~ ~'r~`'i'' '"~r „ y' c ; ` ! `Fi r W4~ lY ~ ..r` '..f f gip:;, '°i~ +wlMw rwwr ~r1► apur _4 arr~e► atwr~o gA~lb . , u v ~ F , m ; ry,. w i „ ~ f , P, ,ff' r 1 } " } .C i t ^ s r h ~i ~xF. { 1 i r, fi: ~ 't ~ t 1 f 2 nom, W,/,~~ Y _ n r.~ t ,a ~ T I .,..,v, ~ ~ ,r ~ 5 r ~..,w4 y ~S, i i s" z,.~ i 11~ . i ~ t ~ } ? t , e. F +9 ;i "44 _ t i ! f ~ Y ~ P :,l,j ~ j J % ~y (i .1 ;r 1- l~ ` ( ~ yr. { F ` 'f'T;:, ;r J} F. 4~~ P i r, ) i~► l `k.. ' ' i / ( t ~t 1 ' r. ai.onr ~ ~wpru ra~ss saris mmm mrrs a.. , . nw. anr> assn srrs► , I,.` ~ ~ • `t f ~ S ....e ~i s ',f l w~ .a. sh. s- ~1 ~ ` 4~ , 1 ~ 1, ~ '1 1 ~ ~ ~ t i r l ~ ` ~ i ~ ~ ~ r i s. S.. f r a. 7, y l' . s ^'S. f ~ .s;~ _..,.~_..e i, ' ( ~ aM~e I I 1 .fd y 'c ,r ~ /i~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ e.,. „ r~~ ~ / } 1 ...___y "'r ~ f - ~ s~ i i i r ■ S ~ ti ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3  ; ` i ti,,,,. /~J ~ r I t ~ ` r ~ _ ~ ~ 1 4 ~ Y~ y~ i ~ 1 f~~ ~~~i F _ ~~k ~ i ` ..t. .ro l ~ -~-p- ' ~ ,a " 1 I t t.4 1° } ~ ~ ~"M ~ 4 ? ~ ~ -r.. ~qe,)e+~ ~ ~ k ~ ~ - j S A t 5 l• ~ r 2 4 4. / J ~ ,,a ~ t r ~ ' ] . p~ i,. ~I. } - ~.-..r. .~_.u_ P-... t ~ ' 1N~ t n/ 4 w ~ ~ \ 1 i ~ ~ Y T L ~ 7 f`~' y ~ ■ 1 1+~+ i 4 ;ti,.; t j } "i ~ } ~ 4 ti y s ~ l_. r a ~t i r # ~ z l v ,r t I Y t 41? ' , ' } ~ 4 i~ 'f~ a S ` ~ r l"• -r 1 1 1 ` i v. fi f 1 ~ t i' S t I 1 1 1 V f ' t, t i t ' i t t 1 i 3 h r . ~ ...n ~ f AID S r ~r a s ~ l a t s_ - 4 x t _ 1v c,' L~ 4 i .T i- ,~r ' i  1 ~ 1 1 ILI _u r r v v lr ,V 1 1 1 1 1 ►.,..7 1 1 \64, 11 V I v kt. I I Wheat Ridge, Colorado W PO-UW & ASSOCIATES, INC. NORTH L! 90 East 9thh -"howerolue D 15' 30' 60' preliminary site plan Sulke 250 u Deao--,,ver, Cdic-,aafido) OOZOB SGALE: 1 " _ 30' September 2, 2005 Page 1 of 1 Meredith Reckert From: Stan Pouw[stan@pouw-associates.com] Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 5:18 PM To: Meredith Reckert Subject: RE: Applewood Baptist Dear Meredith: Thanks for the info. I'll contact Kathy next week. Get some rest! Take care, Stan From: Meredith Reckert [mailto:mreckert@ci.wheatridge.co.us] Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 3:06 PM To: stan@pouw-associates.com Subject: Applewood Baptist Hi, Stan- discussed the proposed plan modifications with the rest of the development review team. In light of your questions about possible r-o-w dedication for W. 32nd Avenue and the fact that there has been no activity on the project for over a year, we are suggesting you sign up for a pre-application meeting. This will give you a chance to describe the changes and potential impact of the project on the technical documents. We hold our pre-application meetings every Thursday afternoon. If you want more info on the process, go to the City's website, to the Community Development Department, planning division page where we have a blurb about the process posted. Please contact Kathy Field, our administrative assistant, to schedule a pre-app appointment. Thanks- Meredith 303-235-2848 10/25/2005 DynaCal - Applewood Baptist Church Page 1 of 3 You are viewing a complete list of all activities for Applewood Baptist Church in Wheat Ridge, Colorado. You may select one or more ministries from the list at the left and view only those events. Click on the event description for more details. is All Events ct Calendar Views Previous Sele ate Today Next S Morithlyblew Fu ll creen c ° ' Pr t Wednesday, September 29, 2004 view efs Department/Category Description Time/Log Applewood BC Wednesday Family Dinner 5:00 PM - Featured Calendars ® Regular Wed FH, Kitchen Adult Ministries Students Student Games 5:00 PM - All Events Hi/Mid School 202-203 N Children's Ministry Students Leadership Training for Student 5:00 PM - Member Ministries Student Leaders Discipleship Leaders Music/Drama Ministry Hospitality Preschool Ministry BLAST G-Force 6:00 PM - Special Events BLAST Wed 101 N, 102 N, 103 N, 113 N Student Ministries Adult First Place 6:00 PM - Sunday School Discipleship 212 N Worship Adult Prayer Meeting 6:00 PM - Prayer Ministry 202S, 204S Orchestra, Band Orchestra Rehearsal 6:00 PM - Orchestra Worship Center Worship Choirs Choir Session One 6:00 PM - Choir 1 Choir Suite Adult Life Trek University - Session 1 (click for 6:00 PM - Discipleship details) 201 N, 204 N, 301 N, 302 N, 303 N, 304 N, 310 N, 315 N Students Priority One - Grades 9-12 6:45 PM - Hi School Chapel Students The Foundation - Grades 6-8 6:45 PM - Mid School FH Adult Life Trek University - Session 2 (click for 7:00 PM - Discipleship details) 201 N, 204 IN, 301 N, 302 N, 303 N, 304 N, 310 N, 315 N Worship Choirs Choir Session Two 7:00 PM - Choir 1 Choir Suite V Thursday, September 30, 2004 Department/Category Description Time/Lo, http://www.dynacal.com/applewoodbc/calendar.asp?OrgId=2865 9/29/2004 DynaCal - Applewood Baptist Church Page 2 of 3 Adult Heritage Singers - Sr Adult Choir 1:00 PM - Sr Adult Min 206 5, 208 S College grounded - college worship 7:00 PM - College Ministr 202-203 N, Worship Center k i Friday, October 01, 2004 P NabbMw Department/Category Description Time/Lo- Adult Women's Conference Planning Retreat Women's Ministr Courtyan: BLAST T&T Club Lock-in 6:00 PM - BLAST Special 102 N, 103 N, 104 N, 113 N, 201 N, 204 N, 301 N, 302 N, 303 N, 304 N Students Friday Night Prayer 7:00 PM - Hi/Mid School 202-203 N 6 F Saturday, October 02, 2004 F Department/Category Description Time/Lo, Adult Women's Conference Planning Retreat Women's Ministr Courtyar( College College Work Day 9:00 AM - College Special 4 Sunday, October 03, 2004 02011111101 Department/Category Description Time/Lo, Worship Blended Worship 8:00 AM - Blended Worship Center Worship Contemporary worship 9:30 AM - Contemporary Worship Center Sunday School Sunday School 9:30 AM - Sunday School 1 Worship Contemporary worship 11:00 AM Contemporary Worship Center _ Sunday School Sunday School 11:00 AM Sunday School2 Romanian Church Romanian Baptist Church Worship 12:30 PM RomanianWorship 206 S, 208 S, Chapel - Music (Special) Scrooge Rehearsals - click for details 2:00 PM - Music Rehearsal 301 S, 310 5, Choir Suite, FH, Worship Center Mbr Min Deacon's Meeting 4:00 PM - Deacons Hospitality - BLAST AWANA - for kids from 3 yrs - 6th grade 5:00 PM - BLAST Sunday 101 N, 102 N, 103 N, 104 N, 110 N, 113 N, 201 N, 202-203 N, 204 N, 301 N, 302 N, - 303 N, 304 N, NBuilding Students Student Praise Team Rehearsals 5:00 PM - Hi/Mid School Chapel Outreach FAITH Team Training 5:00 PM - F.A.I.T.H 202-208 S, 204 S, 206 S, 208 S, Worship Center Outreach FAITH Outreach 5:45 PM - F.A.I.T.H 202-208 S, 204 S, 206 S, 208 S http://www.dynacal.com/applewoodbc/calendar.asp?OrgId=2865 9/29/2004 DynaCal - Applewood Baptist Church Outreach F.A.I.T.H k Monday, October 04, 2004 Department/Category Adult Sr Adult Min Adult Sr Adult Min Applewood BC Staff Event l Tuesday, October 05, 2004 Department/Category Adult Sr Adult Min Adult Women's Ministr Adult Women's Ministr College College Ministr k 0 1 Previous Wed © Copyright 2004 DynaCal, LLC All Rights Reserved Page 3 of 3 FAITH Celebration 7:45 PM - 202-208 S, 204 S, 206 S, 208 S, Worship Center Description Time/Log Chautauqua - Senior Adult Week at Glorieta Glorieta, Homebound Ministry Meeting 10:00 AM 208S Education Staff Meeting 11:00 AM Mumma, Description Time/Lo, Chautauqua - Senior Adult Week at Glorieta Glorieta, Friendship Connection Ladies' Bible 9:00 AM - Study Friendship Connection Ladies' Bible 6:45 PM - Study College Week-night Bible Study - click for 7:00 PM - details away http://www.dynacal.conVapplewoodbc/calendar.asp?OrgId=2865 9/29/2004 Applewood Baptist Church-Adult Ministries Meet 3ames Wagstaff Education Pastor James is responsible for all the education programs of the church. more Meet Shala Deardorff Women's Ministry Director Shala Deardorff is the wife of Pastor Duffy Deardorff. She is a graduate of the University of Tulsa, with a degree in Business Administration and a minor in Sociology. Her primary interest is in the area of women's ministry where she presently serves as director. Contact Info: 303-232-9575 x42 Meet Dr. Bob Clark Pastor to Senior Adults Page 1 of 5 Adult Discipleship and Personal Growth WEDNESDAY Choose a class at NIGHTS class at 7 p.m. or Classes begin Wec Sept. 8 or 15, and to 13 weeks. Life Trek University Applewood's new approach to discipleship and music ministry opportunities on Wednesday nights! Adult Sunday School and Bible Study 6:00 p.m. - 6: Classe: "Frazzled Fe "Basic Christ "Prayer MeE "Apologet "First Place" (2 r week) Celebration Cl Orchesti 7:00 p.m. "Master Your "Unless the Lorc "Men of "God's Plan fc Celebration You can still be im Music and Worshil by attending a dis, class at either hou spending the othe choir or orchestra. During Life Trek U there are activitie children from biW 5th grade, and stL 6th-12th grades. Sunday School is the foundational stratec for leading people to faith in the Lord Jes and for building great commission Christi through Bible study groups that engage 1 http://www.applewoodbaptist.com/adultniinistry.htm 9/27/2004 Applewood Baptist Church-Adult Ministries During his 22-year tenure at Moody Bible Institute as a Professor of Christian Education... more Contact Info: The staff and leadership of Applewood Baptist Church are constantly aware of the changing needs of our community and congregation. New Bible study, ministry and training opportunities are made available as we sense the leadership of the Lord. These opportunities may include discipleship training, short-term Bible studies or other special interest studies. Special Events Special Event Page witness, word, welcome, worship and work. Page 2 of 5 Adult classes generally focus on a group of adults in the same age rang Adult classes are usually interactive and study a specific section of scrip topic, which typically changes monthly. Age range is given as a guide o are welcome to attend any class they choose. = Adult Sunday School ar Study Sundays Sunda School Session One 9:30 a.m. Classes Life Stage Room, Adult 4 (College/Young Professionals, Young aarr Barden College 315-316 Bassett Co-ed (nearly / newly / young married) 02-203 Adult 3 With school age/college age children, Arrington Co-ed 303 N Graham Co-ed Choir Su Evans Co-ed, singles 12 N S. Kintzel Men 13 N M. Kintzel Ladies 04 N Owens Co-ed 302 N Adult 2 (Empty Nesters, 50+) Oxford Co-ed Bible Book Study 1204 N Adult 1 (Retired, Semi-retired, Active Working AdL Dick Ladies 02-204 Dolan Men Prayer C Cheadle Co-ed 206S Gray Co-ed 208S Lloyd Co-ed 01 N Thomas Men 1 211 N Special Interest Card Deaf Bible Study (hearing impaired Adults) 09 N Deardorff Newcomers' (all adults as scheduled) Hospitali Spanish Speaking Adults 01 N Sundays Sunda School Session Two 11:00 a.m. Classes Life Stage Roornj Neel II adults 302 N Adult 4 (College/Young Professionals, Young ar Goodwin Colle a Students 02-203 Co-ed (Young Professionals, 22-35) 04 N Adult 3 With school age/college age children, McLeod Co-ed 303 N McKend Co-ed 302 N Special Interest Russian Speaking Adults 01 N hnp://www.applewoodbaptist.com/adultministry.htm 9/27/2004 Applewood Baptist Church-Adult Ministries Page 3 of 5 Spanish Speaking Adults 14 N Life Trek University - Discipleship/Per nal Gr Leader Class Room, Clark Prayer Meeting - Bible lesson, praise, intercession and thanksgiving 02-204 Meyer Basic Christianity 302 N l Arrington Apologetics 303 IN Newman Frazzled Female 04 N F arr First Place - weight loss through a life- life- hanging relationship with God. Call Julie Parr at 303-232-9575 x18 for details about he next session. 2-213 . Le ader Class Room, - Shunk Men of F.A.I.T.H. - developing men of faith through fellowship, accountability, integrity, rust, and honor 15-316 Kranker Master Your Money 302 N Dick Unless the Lord Builds the House 04 N DuPriest/ Deardorff God's Plan for Intimacy (women's class) 08 S Wednesday On-going Classes 6:00 .m. Leader Class Room, Romanian Church Bible Study 01 N Russian Speaking Adults 01 N *NewComers This four-week class is for attenders and new members who are interested in knowing about our church. You will meet the staff, c ask questions, find out what we stand for and how we serve the I together as member ministers. The class meets in the Fellowship Conference Room at the 9:30 Bible study hour. A new four-week series beains on the first Sunday of each month. Men's and Women's Ministries pi5cavlennj qoa '5 Witt.,.F3earia~ ru~t..,I~ ret si f~ ivf t e ~t,vwW e4je, of t9. 4'5 wvr4 ..Fri€rf-4ski r...)Ze-Ackt" a 4t to t..e Wvrt4 Armt n4 vr5! These ministries seek to encourage and disciple men and women to Poll. Lord's leadership through prayer, Bible study, missions and fellowship. have several foundational ministries in place. Others are being planned added as God gives direction. Seminars and special events are schedule busy schedules and lifestyles of men and women of all ages. http://www.applewoodbaptist.com/adultministry.htm 9/27/2004 Applewood Baptist Church-Adult Ministries Page 4 of 5 - M ' Mi i t en s n s ry Tuesdays a.m. 6:30 Men's Prayer Breakfast No reservation is necessary- join us for breakfast and prayer. Fellowship Hall Wednesdays 7:00 p.m. Men of FAITH - weekly accountability and study group Women's Ministry Tuesdays Friendship Connection Weekly Bible Study "Jesus, the One and Only", a study by Beth Moore Cost: $17 to cover workbook. Child care is provided for ages 9:00 a.m. through Kindergarten. o register lease contact: Sheri Meador 303-422-3572 Friendship Connection Weekly Bible Study "Jesus, the One and Only", a study by Beth Moore 6:45 p.m. Cost: $17 to cover workbook. No child care is provided. o register please contact: Sheri Meador 303-422-3572 Thursdays omen on Mission Meeting the first Thursday of each month for 9:30 a.m. mission education and support Contacts: Ann Dolan 303-423-8278 or i George 303-451-9019 S ecial Events I December 4 Christmas Royal Tea Senior Adults Senior adults at Applewood have many opportunities for study, fellowst ministry: Bible study classes, the Be Active, Live Longer Club (a monthl fellowship and outreach), retirement and nursing home ministries, sociz retreats, senior adult choir and field trips. Senior Adults a month, B.A.L.L. Club is $4 per person, and reservations are not required. TI' an informative, relevant program, and entertainment. 10:30 a.m. 004 Dates: September 28, October 26, November 23, December 21 Dates: March 22. Aoril 26, Mav 24 http://www.applewoodbaptist.com/adultministry.htm 9/27/2004 Applewood Baptist Church-Adult Ministries Page 5 of 5 Singers lult Choir (Rehearsal or Concert) Ruth Strodtman 303-985-3581 the Event Calendar under the Resources tab to find th led Heritage Singers Concert. ©2001 applewoodbaptist.com. All rights reserved. Applewood Baptist not responsible for typographical errors. All information subject to change without notice. http://www.applewoodbaptist.conVadultministry.htm 9/27/2004 City of Wheat Ridge of ""Eqr~ Community Development Department Memorandum ~~<oRAO~ TO: Alan White FROM: Meredith Reckert SUBJECT: ABC - Legislative History DATE: March 23, 2004 Updated October 2006 Per your request, the following is the administrative history of the Applewood Baptist Church property located at 11225 W. 32"d Avenue. The property is zoned Residential-One and is 14 acres in size. • It appears that the church had ownership of land on the north side of 32nd Avenue as long ago as 1969. • The earliest building permit activity on the property was in 1972 when an existing barn on the property was remodeled into a youth center. • A building permit was issued in 1980 for erection of a temporary classroom building. • In 1983, a fill permit was issued for the placement of 98 cubic yards of fill material on the western side of the property. • An existing structure (house?) on the property was demolished pursuant to a demolition permit issued in 1984. • A building permit for construction of an education building was issued on May 5, 1984. The proposed structure has a building footprint of 8293 square feet and was noted on the permit application as being 2-1/2 stories high with two full stories and a basement. Site improvements with the proposed structure included a new curb cut, construction of a small parking area to the northeast side of the structure, private sidewalks, drainage facilities, landscaping and construction of curb, gutter and sidewalk. No public hearing process was required for construction of the new building as churches and accessory structures were permitted uses. The Certificate of Occupancy was issued on September 20, 1985. There have been allegations by neighbors that illegal fill was brought in which increased the building height to exceed the 35' height maximum. There is no separate freestanding fill permit but there may have been fill imported as part of the building permit approval process. The allowable building height at the time of construction was to be measured from finished grade. • A fill permit was issued on June 9, 1988 for construction of a parking lot to the west of the education building. • On May 7, 1989, a change of address notification was issued for the education building changing the address from 11305 W. 32nd Avenue to 11225 W. 32nd Avenue. On June 15, 1989, ordinance # 796 became effective which made churches a conditional use in the Residential-One zone district. Conditional uses were permitted uses which were subject to site plan review to ensure they were properly designed, developed, operated and maintained. Issues for design consideration included mitigation of potential impacts on surrounding land uses, street systems and public services or facilities. • In 1990, a demolition permit was issued for a house on the western portion of property. • In 1992, a fill permit was issued to allow placement of fill to the west of the existing parking lot. • W. 32nd Avenue is reconstructed in 1992. • Case No. WV-93-6 was approved which vacated excess right-of-way from the 32nd Avenue street reconstruction project back to the property owner. • Planning Commission approved CUP-96-1 on April 4, 1996. The purpose of the CUP was for construction of additional parking (approx. 100 spaces) on the west half of the lot. The request was approved with the following conditions: 1. A six-foot high solid fence with a ten- foot strip of landscaping be installed along the western boundary; and 2. Vertical landscaping be installed along the north side of the lot (parking lot). • On July 17, 1996, a neighborhood meeting was held to discuss a potential conditional use application for construction of a sports complex to include a baseball field, two soccer fields and two tennis courts. Thirty people attended the meeting. No land use application for this request was filed. • A building permit for construction of the parking lot approved pursuant to Case No. CUP-96- 1 was issued on December 12, 1996. • On April 10, 1997, a neighborhood meeting was held to solicit input regarding a pending CUP application. Twenty-one area residents attended the meeting. • An application was made for approval of a CUP to allow the construction of a baseball field and volleyball pits as ancillary uses to the church. The intent of the application (Case No. CUP-97-3) was to allow the church to use the recreation amenities as part of their ministry but to allow DeEvelyn High School to use the baseball field for practices and home games. A public hearing regarding this request was held before Planning Commission on May 1, 1997. This case was continued so a compromise could be reached between the church and the neighborhood. On August 22, 1997, the Church submitted correspondence requesting withdrawal of the application. • In February 2001, a revised zoning and development code was adopted which made churches special uses in all of residential zone districts. I On March 13, 2003, the church met with staff members to discuss submission of an application for a special use permit. Another item discussed was the requirement by the city for a consolidation plat. The consolidation plat would consolidate the two existing deed parcels into one. If there are no right-of-way dedications, the plat can be reviewed administratively. In May of 2003, City Council approved legislation modifying the special use permit process. Changes to the process included removal of the neighborhood meeting requirement, removal of the legal protest provision and removal of Planning Commission public hearing. The application starts as an administrative review. If one or more legitimate, written objections are filed against the application, the case is scheduled for public hearing in front of City Council. • On November 18, 2003, a neighborhood meeting to discuss the pending special use application was held at the ABC facility. • On January 12, 2004, City Council approved Case No. ZOA-03-15 that modified the land use process chart in the zoning and development code. The requirement for a pre-application neighborhood meeting for special use applications was included in the legislation. • On January 14, 2004, the church submitted a land use application for approval of a two-lot consolidation plat. This case was being reviewed concurrently with a pending review of SUP application due to traffic concerns. Any required land improvements and associated right of way necessitated by the expansion should be shown on the consolidation plat. • March 28, 2006: Neighborhood meeting held regarding a revised SUP application. • On April 13, 2004, another neighborhood meeting was held with the help of a facilitator from Jefferson County Mediation Services. Subsequent to this meeting, a smaller group comprised of church members and neighbors met several times • August 2004: Application for SUP submitted. Comments regarding the application were sent back to applicant September 2004. No resubmittal. Case withdrawn. • May 2006: Applications for SUP and plat document submitted. • October 2006: PC public hearing on plat. APPLEWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH SUBDMSION A SUBDIVISION PLAT OF TRACT 22 AND THE W-1/2 OF TRACT 21, BROOKSIDE SUBDIVISION, LOCATED IN THE NW-1/4 OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST, 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO SHEET 1 OF 2 APPLENOOD SMTST CHURCH, o Colorado non-profit cwpvalim, being the dens of Me MW pmpvty of 14.73 octet aeaeribM as fallowle Tract 22 and Me Met 1/2 of Treat 21, Br,aYebe Subahtaion, Caonty of "Hason, Slate at Colorado, together with Mat portlon of Met 32nd AwMM, adjoining eW)ecl propety as wooled by Ordinance No. 910. Sales of 1993 and recorded Octaber 1. 1903 undo, Raeptlon N. 93155172 in We County of Jet(... State a Colorado. ALTOGEMER rantaNNg 641,600 Mute feat Or 14.73 Meas more W IOM AND being .IM deeaned . fu. Canmoncn9 at Me C-1/4 came Of Section 2% TawnMlp 3 South. Range 69 West, of Me 6M Prtncipol McMbn1 Menem 58919'5593 a aieta,co of 1475.77 feet obeg Ito muth line of Ms NW-1/4 of nob StatM 26; thence 1,10090'56'W a title.. of 21M feel M Me southeast darner of o pWito of edam right of way for Went 32nd Avenue counted at ROCeptlon No. 93155172 of the Jefenson Canty records and Me Pont of Batsman; Men. NOP30'S6'W a distance of 1305.49 feet along Me tat lint W Mid wanted fight of way and along the east but of Me W-1/2 of Mid Tract 21 M Me northeast comer of We W-1/2 of Mb Tact 21; Mena S8915'27'01 a alelanoe at 49143 feet data Me Mrth Ind Of Mid Treat 21 aM Me naM tine of Mid Treat 22 of Woolson SubdWisian to Me nafthwast asuil of and TOtt 2P Mn. SOY34'SYE o dislana o1 1299.85 feet .1.1 Me rat If.. of sold Treat 22 to Me aaUn at Me-f. Mcnae N8919'SS'E a dislance of 188.99 feel then =13n th Fne of Mid Trat 22 to the Northwest comer Of We orated portlea of AM.. as loaned at ReaPGon Hm 9315517?. then[ SVW)41E o distance of 8.00 feet along the veal line of mid wanted right Of way to Me southwest coma Mereet Men. N8919.55-E a dbtanw of 303.07 feet dead the Muth and of said vaated right of way la Me Pnxt of N no. laid al. subdhidmi and platted sold land as por Me drawing h ten .ntakdo under Me name and style of AWlewoM Baptist Church SubaiWldil a aMaMson of a part of Ilia City of Meet Riage. Colorado and by tau pfesel do MiScons to Me City Of (Meet Ridge and Mo. porno.. of .1 Draped, shown as Mss aents for Me etrunlion. Ymlallag., aaaG., Unantanon., "air and ""scant Or all taeacked. Wit IaluMa but b not Wien to total.. and stook aces, as INe, voter an0 sanlMry 9swer Iba, hyonante, enter At.. ant plpe6. Minna. Dance. street light. and all apNn..a. Maeto. ROBERT MUNR, TRUSTEE APPLE,A00 BAPTIST OHURCI, A C DRAOO NN-PHORT CORPORATION NOTARY CERTIFICATE STATE OR COLUHAOO ) MNN OF JFFFERSN)SS THE FOREGOW INSTRUMENT WAS AOENOWNGED BEFORE TIE NIS _ DAY OF A.O. 2000, BY ROBERT MINT7. AS TRUSTEE. MOM MY HAND AND OFTIOAL SEAL MY COMMISSION E04RE4 NOTARY PUBUC PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATE Apeoved MN - day of ~ 2006, by Me Meet Ridge Planing Commnalon. NNRPERSN CLERK AND RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE STATE OF COLORADO )SS CONK OF iFFfltSN) 1 HEREBY Ml MAT Bit$ RAT WAS BUD IN THE OFFICE OF ME COUNTY LTERIL AND RECOROTR OF .BFFERSOH COUNTY AT CODION, tDLORARO, AT _ O'C.OC( ill. ON ME _ DAY OF 2006 AD., N BON - PAGE REOPTON NO, JEFFERSON COUNTY Qt MID RECORDER BY: MIN)w NOTES L BASS OF BEM GS THE SOUM UNE OF TIE NW-1/4 OF SECTION 28. TOMSH P 3 SOUTH, RANGE fig :EST, aTH PRINCIPAL. MERIDM BEARS SB IWM-W AS MONUMEDTED AND SHOWN HEREON, AND AS 9NO:N ON THE ON RIGHT OF WAY If REFEROMM MON.NENTS MAP. 2. FLOOD ZONE UNITS ARE SHOWN ACCORONG TO ME FEMA FLOOD IN9JR.gNCE RATE NM FOR JEFFERSON CONK, COLORADO AND IXCORPCOIEO AREAS MAP NUMBER 0 8 05 9 00 215-E AND MAP NUMBER OSO58C0194-E BOTH DAM JUNE 17. 2003. ME PROPERTY NORM OF MIS LINE 5 IN ZONE-AE OF ME 100 YEAR FLOOD HAZARD AREA. AND HAMM BASE FLOOD EIEVAnNS. ME REMAINDER OF ME SUB.ECT PROPERN, INCL W ME SOUTHERN LOT. LIES IN ZONE-X (UNSHADED) VOUCH 15 OUTSIDE OF ME 100-YEAR FLOOD HA7AR1 AREAL 1 MRS SURyEY ODES NOT CONSTITUTE A 1171E SEARM BY MOUNTAIN STATES F110NEFAING ASSOOARS P.O TO DITEWINE OMNEe9HP OF MS PMM- RIGHTS OF WAY, EASEMENTS, MO ExGIIIBRMCES OF RECOM IERE BASED IXNW A TIRE NLJCY BY LAND TTLE GUARANTEE COMPANY UNDER ORDER NO. A80811603 OATED SP. 20. 2001 AT 5:00 P.M. 4. NOTICE. AMORDNG TO COLORADO lAW YOU MUST COMMENCE MY LEGAL ACTION EASED IPUH MY DEFECT N THIS SURVEY WARN TMfEE YEARS AFTER YOU MST DISCOYEtED SJOI DEFECT. N NO EMONT MAY MY ACTION BASED UFONI MY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE C %flWOO ED MORE MAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF TINE CERTIFICATION SHO:X HEREON. 5. M EASEMENT FOR A e FIRE LINE CONNECTION IS DOX IED AT REC. NO F0057378, THIS DESORPTION COLS NOT IDENTIFY A SEECFM WIDTH OR LOCATION OF MIS EASEMENT. B. SUBJECT PROPERN IS ZONED R-1 (flESDENTAI-ONE) ACCOANG TO TIE ON OF WIFAT MOM. 7. ME DRAINAGE DITCH SHOWN IS APPAREHRY NOT N M EASEMENT OF RECORD B. TEN-FOOT (IG) V.TE EASEMENTS ME HEREBY ORMTED ON FRVATE MahEtN OF EACH LOT IN THE SUBDIVISION OR PLAT1E0 AREA AS SIOM ON ME ATTACHED RAT. FIVE-FOOT (5) WIDE EASEMENTS ME HEREBY GRANTED ON PRIVATE PROPERN OF EACH LOT IN TIE SNROINBN OR FLATTED AREA AS SNOW ON THE ATTACHED RAT. THM ASEMEN ARE DEDRAJO) MAINTEENANC .ERA EMMENT OFFSELECTRIC. GAS, IELEN50NINSCATBIORANAM AND LAND TOECNMUNICATIONS FACUTIES UTILNOS SMALL AL50 BE PERMITTED WNW MY ACMM EASEMENTS AND PRIVATE STREETS N TIE 9JBDNSDIL RERMNENT STRUCTURES .WD WATER TEETERS SNN1 NOT BE PERMITTED WMN SAID UnUN EASEMENTS 9. ME STORY OETENTHIN AREA HERE SHOWS AS MTE)l EA90JENn SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED BY ME OMER AND SVBSEOJEHT 09NFR1 HORS. SUCCESSORS AND ASSINS. IN THE EVENT MAT SUN CONSTRUCTION MD MNNTENMM IS MY PERFORNEO BY SAID OWNER, ME ON IY MOAT ROCS 91NL HAVE ME MONT TO ENTER SUO1 AREA AND PERFORM NECESSARY WORN, ME OUST OF WHOH SAID OWNER, HORS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS AGREES TO PAY. NO BUIEOING OR STRUCTURE WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE DETENTION AREA MD NO CHANGES OR ALTERATIONS AFFECTING THE HTORAUUC NARACTEAll OF THE DETENTION AREA WILL BE MME WITHOUT ME APPROVAL OF THE DIRECTOR OF 11U9UC MORNS 10. A lO WOE UTUTY A: RRANAM EASEMENT IS HEREBY DEDICATED BY MS PLAT OMODENT WITH ME EXISTING tO DRAINAGE EA4yIER RECEROFD AT REOPTON NO 84119721 AND ENTENOW TO TIE NORM PROPERTY UNE AS SIOYAI HEREON. CITY CERTIFICATION APPROVED NISI DAY OF 2006, BY ME ON OF WHEAT MOM ATTEST'. SCAtE 1'~ 2000' M wM AY£ `e GFM GtWL WY&AE k ~ S SITE - a sees. 4 Ft u ~ W tam A . VICINITY MAP IS CERTIF I, DOIOLAS R. BERUNG A PROFESSIONAL 9310 SURVEYOR RFOSTERED IN TIE STALE OF CODRADO. DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARY N ADREWOaD BAPTIST CHBRN SUBDVIS ON WAS MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY ORECT SUPERM50N MO TO ME MST OF MY XMWMLE GE. NFOMl AND BEARER. N A=QM AME W N ALL Appl~ STAW~ CURRENT AMONPMYM AAT )ACC MD1Y REPRESENTSSAID S.RYEY.AS AMENDED, ME t an CUW MAYOR COMWRN WiO.DPMENT DIRECTOR DOUOM R. BOLNG DATE R5 31594 DRECTOR OF Is, %KMO APPLEWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH SUBDMSION A SUBDIVISION PLAT OF TRACT 22 AND THE W-1/2 OF TRACT 21, BROOKSIDE SUBDIVISION, LOCATED IN THE NW-1/4 OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST, 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO SHEET 2 OF 2 n n PORTION OF REACT 12 3d BR"WE W®]INSION PORTION OF TRACT 12 BRO0f5DE SUBDINSION ^I ZONED R-1 10' DRAINAGE h UnUW uSENENT AP P LE W000 KNOLLS 12TH FILING LOT 1 I LOT 2 I LOT 3 I LOT 4 I WT 5 I ZONED R-1 N I I I I ~SOO'w'w'E 5' ORANACE Y 620 UnUW EA9 DIT B' SANITARY WWR EASrJAENr \ W. 939. PG. 408 i LENA GULCH rt `I i\ PORTION OF TRACT 11 ^ a] w , I ' BROW DE SUMINSION \ ACCESS AND ` I ZONED R-1 '0 MANXNANCE r T E ` O, 9p K "2 C. NO. 0. F0206289 1 1 1 \ I 500.3SWE I ; 6.20' ' - SWUWE - - r ) ifi.00' SOD93.14-E \ ' \~4 .J 1I I~ ~Y 14.87 \ ~ I m \I TRACT B 1 I " m N~ C BANZHAF &EIDIWSON w o ZONED R-1 NM '45'W 6H5 16' SANIT ARY PG 158 BN. 161Q 27'E N89l * y D1 38' PORTION OF TRACT '34'33°E BROOKSIDE WBOIWS 0' ZONED R-1 ' 5/8 REBAR W/LASIIC GAP I LS 1]669 I GULCH IN 00 YEAR FO ZONE - (SM PUT NOTE 2.) 18' SANITARY SEWER EA ENT em. 961. PG 580 SET 5/B' REHAB W/ PLAn'. CAP L$ 3 w4 ;I k-'-DRAI DITCH PUT NOT TE ~I I SEE PLAT / 2ANL / j)%'13 rm LOT 2 PAR " EL UNES u~ 343,400 Sq. Ft. 119s PUTT ; W qz a` oS Sw'34'33'E 10' DRAINAGE 8 16.25' UTILITY EASEMENT SEE PLAT NOTE 10 I SlV>.T L 1 hf mIO ~I SOO'34'33'E `L IV DRANA 2E EASEMENT WT6 lF 0 25 w to SCALE 1'- 50' 10 PSCO U1El1Y NOC31'67'V - - - - -FAS~Ir 121.32' PFC. NO. 64112w0 N09D1'lYE 1305.49' w w WIL ~r - - - - - MD01539~] 198.98' - - - Nw'31'57 W - - _ _ _ 15.63' NOOW39-W x96.83' - - - - - -t? EW9E IENT E FOR WT 2 POINT 0' C01114m NIFENT C-1/4 MR- SEa 26 T3% R69W. 6111 P.WL FIND. 2-1/Y AWN. CAP W 24682. 1991. N RANGE BOX k ^1 22' CAP AP INGRESS/EGRESS N5926'03'E N A'A' NDO'31'5]'YI I I I I I h IC0ww N99+01'IT I;mr l 'u ERL IeNi iN W.40 NOOI x? III I I ' W- M wL3w I ' y In I $ ~.I aI ~ ~ z ~ <j W I _3I3I N t lm _ - _ - I~ q u . - N 3I r ~ I r 0.I °1I~' l POf? N OF RGW VACATED ~ l I AT IEa Na 931551x2 AT ATUTY NIX 931 RE9RiER I m I IXtYERLT F LOT 1 10' PSCO umw R v I IaACi sz 298.200 Sq. Ft. W0. Na e T s11MODO I I FND s/6' RmuE III W / ~ w I S 1PW40IWE ~1aer 1297 5003 ICOV 10.00' wO 14E 1200' _ FONNERLY ;I n PIo TRACT 22 / 10' ORANACE ! J gI~ Un111Y EASEIIFNT N69Y9WE ' ~ 10.00 7296.85' _ SEr 5/8' 13B.Vi - W/ PuSnC CAP \ REG NO. 8/119721 1O 11014 OF TRACT 23 IS 345()4 pt Tmm OF iR.6CT 23 HROONSOE WO0IN90N Bftwlc OE W8DI ION ZONW R-1 I ZONW R-1 IW z IZ Q IIZ YM I~ L 1 73 CDR. BRI SEC. 28 I 735, R69W. PAL ENO. 2-1/2' AWN CAP W 24982, 1991, A RANGE BOX WEND SW 26, 2906 REVISFC .wG 31. 2906 PUtOING MAY 1% 2006 asa ~ ~-,v pUZG 15DM a 5.a ~I - 5n5o Shh9~ "saae_ ~ - ~ P 3 0 li s 4- ~ H o 54 - W Stray II I 3S 5 t m i± _~544t" - _ ~4 ~ I q5 /I c4 - 16 I % a ~ I r / n---- 0 _ r _ - v ,,ZSVS ~ rl n ~ I' I I J S a ob` l _ o . - - a \ J~,~, sazs, x o U o ~ _ f1 o U A p a. Y w L t Q is _ Q - a g 3 0 ~ o w 5 K ° ~J a.;a Y a Y A S$ ~ ~ a9 ~ ~ ➢ 8 ~ § ~S. ~'I 9 „3 4 ~ $ R Q„` y p£ 8,~h - yg %g '3 N' ~ N g fc ^ & e a x o U A ~a U 4 v T~T O ~-I C U v N G G O 3 U e o % z O Q z F Q O O w Q J ~ W i W ~ = P W J W F - a - F ~ O 1 Q. N z M a w x a F O j 3 Y z O ~ z ~ F _.Fi II Q t ~ Q w W W J W F N x a Q r F ' o ~ W z~ F 9 ~ ~s Al ~ f ` a av~ s ss l a V m "s ys a ~m is g ae~a x o U m _ v m all v e' x - U c a L c 3 0 v 09 ~ v ^ W 9 l~--I O O W a i Z O x - r Q w 4 r w o w j 3Y. & ~ ~ 4 9Qq P~ ° ~ nMt 9 S U a a, a ~ww qm a~y~~ \r 34V 4NZf 1S3M ~o 2, 4w, A ~ w I I I". 96I .SS.`8 - n IL' H e I LL a 9 nu 9 y 5 o~PF45 2 ~nt£. a~u wa aa¢i as coo 005 3 W J Q d a EVEV-962-£0£ Va " ° ' ° oe Ih~ IO~~ ti0 409 W ~ew. av«-:«i.«i u z 3sa e ninny ql,5 YCe3 Q5 ' eulfiu3 fiulllnzur~ loai>♦aaPf/laaluoyaary MU M AAtldl38 a e a i sevoossy v mnoa - H021(1H0 O0OM3lddV a7 g n0wo ilium P, Fit( s f a 140C fa teals ;own, pa; C I ~aa Y a, D1 . ~ F i. . ~ 1• "Y-~'f$I L1 'i ; ~ ~ l I' I ~ tin ~ . H I loan too My I, I I I ~ i I a~ F I I ~ a 1 I I ..=11 a al . l !J ; I } ~ a b I I } P I,'n PI d fiiei a s .a a- 'b'~la 1'I rL b A; 1 ~d . a a as . a ' @ ti a 3 R T ~ 2 26251 p F c 1F6~ 5s Y ~ e ! ~y a, itiil'i33~ga 4 e!!99 lgisi{ liii t2Ei ti 1 IMP ~ ° i e M! MIN 3 2 ' )f! ) 1 kk 0111 ' ~laF >-1ti 1(31 1 sfiHM 11 d es is f eie. . - " € • 22 g,1. lh It 'M HUM 1, gig{€ei aiif{{ E~ { 3z~jt7EEy$~3a`i e~ ai1 lf g!!Y if i' i till. )t ji) ~ KIM I~ii .€.31 B5i22 ~2F P $ 1 S 5 ~ S..a~ `.8~'' Sn T a °q A ~ ~ 3 b « a , o ov o~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 1, BLOCK 1 APPLEWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH SUBDIN50N. 5URVEY0R'5 CERTIFICATION I, DOUGLAS R. SERUNG, A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF COLORADO. DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARY OF APPLEIVODD BAPTIST CHURCH SUBDIVISION WAS MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOMEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF. IN ACCORDANCE WTH ALL APPLICABLE COLORADO STATUTES, CURRENT REVISED EDITION AS AMENDED, THE ACCOMPANYING PLAT ACCURATELY REPRESENTS SAID SURVEY.' DOUGLAS R. BERLING DATE PLO 34594 CITY OF MEAT RIDGE - DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NOTE5 - VICINITY M, I. CASE HISTORY WVAS-6 GUP-96-I MS-4-01 MS-04--04 5-C( M M5-06-07 SVP-06-02 2. EXI5TIN6 ZONING 15 RISIDENTIAL.ONE. THIS PORTION OF THE 5UBDIV1510N (LOT I, BLOCK I) IS TO BUILD AN ADDIT ON TO THE EXISTING EDUCATION BUILDIN6, AND PARKING REQUIRED SCALE. 1'= 2000' BY THE TOTAL EDI).ATION BUILDING AS WELL AS THE CHURCH. THE PROCESS 15 BY A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. THE OTHER PORTION OF THE SUBDIVISION (LOT 2, BLOCK 1) WILL BE DEVELOPED BY OTHERS. PROPOSED OHAN&E PRESENTLY THE EXISTING EDUCATION BUILDING HAS PARKING FOR ITS OWN U5E (85) AND CHURCH USE (150) TOTALING 2B OARS. THE NEW EDUCATION FACILITIES REQUIRE AN ADDITIONAL 214 CARS, WHILE THE CHURCH PARKING 15 INCREASED TO 144 OARS. 50 THE TOTAL PARKING ADDED 15 22B OAR. (TOTAL 15 441 OARS) THIS PROPERTY 15 IN ZONE X (UNSHADED) AS DE516NATED ON FEMA5 FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP, COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 08050900215E, DATED JUNE 'IT, 2005. 5. APPLEWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH SUBDIVISION Lot I, Blcck 1 4, AREA = 6.85 ACRES (29e,2005f) 5. SITE DATA BREAKDOWN EXISTING CONNECTOR NEW EDUC. ADDITION TOTAL BUILDING COVERA6E 8,3755F 2,2515f 12,158ef 14,589sf 22,7645f 7.6% EUILDIN6 (6PA) 24;515sf ( 60P.f 29,076.1` 55055sf 60,5005f LANDSCAPE IO'OOOSf(S) n/a n/a 76,S68sf 869655f 28.9% HANDSCAPE 5,158sf n/a n/a 10,79451` 15,952.f 4.1% PARKING 81;56b5f n/a Na 95025 f 115,189sf BSA% TOTAL - L071 298,2005f 6. PARKING REQUIREMENT EXISTING EDUCATION BUILDING 24,8155E 0 1/5005£ 65 OARS PROP055D EDUCATION BUILDING CLASS ROOMS LEVEL I 14,5595f a I/SOOSf 45 CARS GYM / KITCHEN LEVEL 2 14,5056f ® 1/1005f 145 CARS OLASS ROOMS LEVEL 5 6,99151` ® l/5005f 25 OARS CHURCH PARKING NEEDS 144 OARS TOTAL 441 CARS 7. 517E L16HTIN6 REQUIREMENTS ❑ TYPE I MAXIMUM IS- HIGH FROM U1 GRADE TO TOP OF FIXTURE. METAL HALIDE Q TYPE 2 12' H16H FROM GRADE TO TOP OF FIXTURE. METAL HALIDE LI&HTIN6 SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 26-505 OF WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. W. 441X AW9 Ct£A0. CftFFM W. 5. AVE. H SITE W. 3yJ AVE. 9 V' W. 36M AVE. SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLEWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH Wheat Ridge, Colorado POUW & ASSOCIATES, INC. Il90 Eml 91h Avenue Sud4e 250 Denver, Colorado 50203 303-296-4343 cover sheet October 10, 2006 N00°30'x6"W -.1305. ss I 128 DRApNAGE DITCH / I I ~I I \ l c* I I I , \Y lj4 ~ I I Y ~ / tr I III . POUW & ASSOCIATES, INC. 190 But 9ffi Avenue Suite 230 Deaver, Colorado 80203 303-296-4343 I ~ I ~ I 1 ! se POND _ 25' HIDE ACCESS EASEMENT FOR LOT 2 INGRESS/EGRESS Q1 i ' n Ss v 45' JP C A (P I BUS PARKIN& n ' H 11--~~PSP GLONR' IAI ~ HEN SUf U. .1. N ~I P V 1 1 v ~ \ e to 1° , - I, I 'I I ~ ~ I I i I' ~ i III I I EE P T NOfE ~'I 11 1 ~ I \ N°JT I 1 ~ I' A A ~ /~;\1 I ~J t\ I I ' \ v 11 \ 1 ' i i U' i ~ II I I y; 1 , A~ I m 1 j ye ~~o I r I I II I f f I _ I ~ Sa 34'33',E 1296.8b' w - A A V, I r~ 1 I EX15TI NG BUILDING (P if L F r I ~ \ I IA Ii'I\ / III > ~,j VAN -YAC~GE55. VANxg AGGE9~'i, of I I ~ U p 1 \ NEVI A \ I of Ill~rnS1 14.'12' 1 1 _ 3` j> A G l 1 ~ II 55 I 1 I I 4 1 y . 7 1 I IIG H ° I 0 1 Ld K Tilff9- ~2zhrt_.~ _ - 1600_8 ` T 10'DRAINAGE EA5EMENT J^I REC. NO. 84119721 UTILITY IEASEMENDT ^II A P P L E W 0 0 D BAPTIST CHURCH Wheat Ridge, Colorado NORTH 0 1E special use permit site plan 5LA1£''' CO' October 10, 2006 4TOP 3b' OF RCOF 134Rnb• I FLOOR FIN ISH 113'-O" 9EWIb FINISH FLOOR ESE";'. Y 134'-O• THIRD FIN15H FLOOR III'3" SELIX07 FINISH FLOOR 11P`i t"71 , I I I I I I I IIP°1 IT-111 I Ip 1 f NI I 15-----~ I 11° _yl Itl-°J Y ° 111 l L _ ~ i1____-1 I I `_-J ~-may I I I - 01 Itl _ 1 I _ 'I 11 I -_--h I II 'r - I 1 I 0 I IP°1'tl I I If`lf`3' I I ~ oSvJ I I ~°dA=~ 1 ! II 1 I II I I If"➢f°9P I 1 I ~c~b-~ I I I S O U T H E L E V A T I O N SL E. /B" _ I'-O" Sqb- N OR T H E L E VAT I ON h 159'-O" 4 MIWOIM GF RCGF POUW & ASSOCIATES, INC. 190 Fmt 9th A venous suite 250 IIDemver, Colorado 80203 339-296--4343 APPLEWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH Wheat Ridge, Colorado 4~~ 6i education building elevations scut. Ire• August 8, 2006 14T-O' TOP OF ROOF 1°Ab' TOP OF PARAPQT 24b" TreRD FINIEM FLOOR nz sEC-o' O m FIVISN FLODR ICO'q• FIRST FIN1511 FLOOR U T H E L E VAT I ON /B. - ,.-0„ 146Y TOP GF ROOF E%ISTllii ®lILD11K 142-" V TOP OF PPRAPET 120 THIRD FLOOR E%ISTINS PJIILDIN$ '-D" sEGONp FL ff II6E%1 9iIN6 WILDIN9 104'-O• FIRST FLOOR E%ISTIN$ %IILDIKS N O R T H E A 5 T E L E V A T I O N SG : VB•-Ill. POUW & ASSOCIATES, INC. E90 ]Ent 9th Avenue Suite 250 Denver, Colorodo 50203 303-296-41343 50UTHWE5T ELEVATION y ALE I/B' - 1'-O" N O R T H E L E V A T I ON scale: ve'-,'-o" 146'-D' TOP Gf RPOF 2XI9TN5 &IILDIN6 143-0' TOP GF PARPPE 20'0' TAIRD FLWR P(ISTINb &IILDIN6 116'-D' sEGOND FLCCR ExlsnN6 aILDIN6 104-" Flaw FLOOR ExlsrlN6 a11LDINs 143-' TOP OF ROOF 190'.0' TOP OF PARR 1340' THIRD FINISX FL03R 113-0" SELOND FINISH FLOOR 100-' PIRBT FINISX FLOOR APPLEWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH Wheat Ridge, Colorado D 4' B' I6' connector elevations -J 6OALE: I/o'' I°. August 8, 2006 1 1421' W E 5T E L E V AT I ON 50u : va. - r-o• APPLEWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH Wheat Ridge, Colorado POUW & ASSOCIATES, INC. 19U East 9th Avmue o 4 a• 16• education building elevations Simla 23C R.J-LJ IIDe®wea, Colorado 80203 .cue, ve• , ro' August 8, 2006 3,33-296-4343 APPLEWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH LANDSCAPE PLAN 500 30 56-E 4 , ~P 00 F \ r - RIM 54zi r. ~~{{yy~~~I~q ~ ~SO SYt 2-6, - VI 1NV YXIY-@a125o - - ~ TREE TO REMAIN ETYPJ _ 8 SANITARY SEWER EA \B F' SEMENT r F BK. 939, PG" 40R 1 z NOTEi, SEWER LINE, NOT _ IRRIGATION AND/OR , , F IN EASEMENT DRAINAGE DITCH \ V NO EASEMENT OF RECORD A F 24" STORM - ' 11 m' NIA It{ I I RIM.- 5421 02 / A INV I DVT N = 541$413,1}2 i ( a yIINV = 2] (ACCESS AND\\ MAINTEWANCE F } 1 I. EASEMENT \ \ \ F S00*3 50033VRNI~~ 4 ~ e \ 00'33'14"E R 0 AREA NOT TO BE OISTU PISSED 1800 5003314'E) d - - C, 168] p / - w 1 < p ( I t r N N. 10' PSCO UTILITY , EASEMENT soo 3D'56E II • 6 Ec. No. 84112500 - 10'' U-TIL 5 3 2 a 3 B TLS 3 PP 3 3 PC b H LAB T AP- ] BP 1 ! 9 GLB r 14 l GL b BBC 6 66J 1 \ 1 CU fJ -TREE TO I SPA -REI-IAM TYPj 1` \ Bb2J_ TP 'S > A cJ ST t~ \ {3416T1,Wa / - vl ~ ETO BE uKC(/,~ d~ O~~ T~ I~Ylryll 1~«. i ...4 '3 c ~`aEb-. \ .4 e•l11 .e O. J,i ~ `61 eLr6 awl i 49 9 ~NG 1 AAt1f g~ ~ aS 14M c d~ a PBU n IIL°L o S s - .s e p x \ EXISTING SEMEN TFEE TORE REC 841112500 TOYED . . BU L,DIN Q_ TREM TO EXISTINSi TREE TOE CCC~~' 1 REI111 ttPJ' I6~' V6 . ~ Exa GLE, . L Ry\D\B 21 OUR J Q - cP R FOR 6 . EXIST see TREE O T IH (T YEiU G_ RMHOVIS GF' - - I4 I'GLB RIM 542201 V ~ W INV IN 5413.21 INV OUT SRIbl-3 .n _ LIM" IN \ 11 { I t-1- e\ 16' SANITARY SEVER lIm I 1~ jl ..EASEMENT m { L ~ SKI. 884, PG. 580 OS -SD- DS 05 -SD- 05 SD- 000666 50-_ DS -~STas ---SD- 05 S00'34'33'E ta159 \.STO~2M, MH RIM = 54227 i2 NV IN 541455 r,'\- RICO= S42E SEEDING AND M.U.N. WSTAL.. AND( SEEDING AND MULCHING MAINTENANCE NOTES FL,4NT LIST 1. SSEP.1EWFOR: 1, SEEDED AND MULCHED AREAS SHALL BE INSPECTED FOR REQUIRED COVERAGE MONTHLY pmlglule T. - ARFAOFSEEDINGPNDMULCHING FMAPEWO00FTWOYEARBFMONNGINinA S EDINGREPAIRSANORE-SMDINGANO -TYPE OFSEEOMIX(PERMANENT.TEMPORARY,ORLOWGROWFH). MULCHINGSH SEUNDERTAKENNTERTHEFIRSTGROWINGSEPMFORANYADISSFAILING 2 ALL BRANOSFUMISHEDSHALL BEFREE FROMAIU NOXIOUS SFFDS INCULDINGRUSSWJGR TOMEETTHEREOUIREDCOVER4GE CPNAOUN THIBTLE. WARSE FESCUE EVPAPEAH BIHDN£EO.JOHNSONGRPSS.KNAP WEEP PND LEAFY 2" REQUIRED COYEMOE FOR STANDARD, OPEN SPACE AND LOWGROWTH SEED MIXES SHALL SPURGE, BE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS: 3. THESEEI SHALL FURNISH TO THE CONTRA. A SIGNS. STATEMENT CERTIFYING MATME 1" THREE I3) PLANTS PER SQUARE FOOT WITH A MINIMUM NMI OF 3 INCHES. THE3 SEED FURNISHED IS FROM A LOT THAT HAS BEEN TESTED BY A RECOGNIZED LABOMTIXIYSEED - PLANTS PERSQUARER FOOD SHALL BEOFTHEVANSTYANDSPEC IESFOUND RTHECITY WHICH HASBECOME WET.MOLDY. OR OTHERWISE DAMAGED IN TRANSIT OR IN STORAGE WILL NOT SE APPROVED MIX ACCEPTABLE. BUD NCKETSSHALL BEPFA MDTO THE CLTYUPON REQUEST. 2, NO BARE AREAS LARGER THAN 4SWARE FEET(TWILFEET BY TNOFEET OR EQUIVALENT). 4. OMU SEEDINGMIX SHALL CONFORM TO THE TABLE ON THE RIGHT. 3. FREE OF ERODED AREAS, 5. IFME SEED AMMAR. ON TH EMPA1 DOES NOT MEET TE MINIMUM PURITY ANO FREE FRCI INFESTATION OF NOXIOUS WEEDS I N ACCORDANCE WITH SECT( ON 64 OF TUP 4 GERMINATION PERCENTAGES SPECIFIED, THE SUBCONTRACTOR MUSTCIXMFN. FOR A LESSER , GESCCRDERNMANUAL. PERCENTAGE OF PURITY OR GERMINATION BY FURNISHING SUFFICIENT ADDITIONAL SEED TO EQUAL REO U IRED COME RAGE FOR TURF GRASS AREMSHALL BE DEFIN ED AS FOLLOWS: 3 ME S PECIRED PRODUCT. ME TAGS FROM TH E SEED MIXES MUST BE SUPPLIED TO CONTRACTOR MR ' . AT LEAST W% VEGETATIVE COVER OF GRASS SPECIES PLANTED. 1 FORWARDED TO ME CT GESL INSPECTOR - NO ENE AREAS LARGER MAN 4SWARE FEET UWOFEET BY TWOEEET OR EOUNAIEM). 2 6. ME FORM AUSED FOR DETERMINING ME WADTTY OF PURE LIVE SEED PUS) SHALL BE (POUNDS OF SEED) X IPURNYIX(GERMINATION)= PW NOS OF PURE UVE SEED( PMT . 3. FREEOFEROMCAREAS. T. PERMANENT SEED MIX SHALL BE USED U NLESS OTH FRWISE AP PROVED BY ME CRY 4. FREE FROM INFESTATION OF NOXIOUS WEEM IN ACCORDANCE VAH SECTION 6.40E ME e. Al. TO BE SEEDED AND MULCHED SHALL HAVE NATIVE TOPSOIL ORAPPROVEO SOIL GESCCRRERNMM. AMENDMENTS SPREAD TO A DEPTH OF AT LEAST 6 NI (DOME DEPTH). FALL ROADS MD OTHER 4. RILL MD GULLY EROSION SHALL BE FILLED Wrl TOPSOIL PRIM TO RESEEDING THE COMPACTED AREAS SHALL BE LOOSEN ED TO A DE PM OF 6 I NCHES PRIOR TO SPREADING TOPEOV PRESS DI NO METHOD SHALL BE APPROVED BY TH E CRY. 9, SOIL IS TO BE THOROUGHLY LOOSENED QILLED)TO A DEPTH OF AT LEAST 6 INCHES PRIOR TO SEEDING, WE TOP B INCH ES OF ME SEED BED SHALL BE FREE OF ROCKS GREATER THAN 4 INCHES Yl~etrlMflY HpeL 'e. Lev ANDSOILCLOOSGREATERTIAN 2 INCHES. SEEDING OVER MY COMPACTED AREAS THAT HAVENT BEEN THOROUGHLY LOOSENED SHALL BE REJECTED, 10. SEED 5TO BE APPLIED VSINGAMECHANICAL DRILLTOADEPTH OF IM INCH. ROW SPACING SHALLBENOMORETHNOINCHES. NATERLLLUSEDFORMULMSMA WNSISTO WNGSTEMMM STRAW. ATLEAST60PERCENTOFTHE MULCH, BYWEIGHT.SMUL BE 10MCHESOR MOREIN LENGTH. MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED ND MECHANICALLY ANCHORED M A DEPTH OF AT LEAST 21 NCHES. MULCH SHALBEMP LIED AT A RATE OF 4m DR. OF STRAW PER ACRE i i. I r ME PERM ITIEE DEMONSTRATOR TO ME CITY THAT IT IS NOT POSSIB LE TO DRILL SEED, SEED IS TO BE UNIPO ALLY BROADCAST AT MO TIMES THE DRILLED RATE, THEN LIGHTLY NARROWED TO PROVIDEASEED DEPTH OF APPROXIMATELY IN INCH, THEN ROLLED TO COMPACT. MEN MULCH ED AS SPEaREOABOVE. 12. SEED ING AND MULCHING SHALL BE COMPLETED WITH( N W DAYS OF INmAL EXPOSURE OR T DAYS AFTMGRADING IS SUBBTANTIALLY WMFLERE INA GIVENNEA (AS OERNEO BYT E CIM.THIS MAY REQUIRE MULTIFLE MOBIL WTONS FOR SEEDING MO MULCHING. 13. MULCH SHALLSE APPLIED W W 24NOVRS OF SEEDING. 14. TACKIFIER SHOULD BE UDUMD TO HELP WITH STWW DISPLACEMENT SPECIES VARIEN MUTES %IN MIX BUFFALOGRASS TE%gN PAWS 20 32 BLUEGRAMA HACHITA PNWB 20 0S W RAW p3WBA PALS 20 32 SIDEOATSGRAMA VAUGHN PI 20 1S TNI PIK CRITANA RHOS 10 1 EATGRA3G SCDAR PNCS 10 12 I TOTAL tlA I - J $ 5 ytlq CIXb aw. 6g. BcISM1IRC Ne2a Lomm WPe See By 6 C Aaar plMIIMINe'E"Id Onf:' Emsela Waalllpb ]'-Cel 6`I 10 4ta MYroltlee'°s,M-lwl' 6dmedlwe'NPN ]'-Cel Pd Q Fexlgy pHNYNenlu'PeMero PaYncn deM1 ]'-UI IX b GIeOIUIa VlaUlrtbe "wfaflel' 1 lal Ipye! 1°-UI 6 Nb cIXdale G,sl GMt Ife.Ll/4el $'-Cel RC UP n O,mae Mrs n rwl oak 3°-UI IOU 4 f\fe ui Ue-Ian lan Pm, 2'GI UP 4 wevun Pm, 3°-UI GP a Pfe ullsyem'fJa,Rlc4w' Qtlrnblew Pm, ]•-CAI E I R - CoN Obrv bn. 0clrttific Nenu Gmmm FG 61N BP 9 PMVx eNaleY B'Ietle'av plro 6' BB dIA ll P,w nl9,a PueVlen IM PP I Rnw PaMOee pl,u R, Is 6' BIB EMLLS GWe b,{✓•. eclenlflc Neme Camon Wm & u 14 Commalw eottllollw v etw P l 5-Ge WE I D IT WIN' Ewa<ymu lwlwl'Enm I .r Gal S-Gel ROD pJll B2 r .kM YxlioMelle'Filrva of BYlm' . 1 IMI" Rr. Rwew LM 5-Gel 61 ]M Jwl ww aebM'butlle' M,MmdM d1e jW 5-Gel A9.1 l9 51wre dw' J ww BIwN Jw 9-W W3C IK -I P.vu bmeyl C BYIVn MM CFeny 5-Gal M PoLS efOmaUU'W Owl' O'o-LOU bNC 5-Gel TI TLe n Ru. l.llauve nY«-Iwf .,a.c s.Gal OlR l] P-, x 1Itac Q,M R IOU W Rae 5.Oel FGS 36 I- VIIWaW Fn lry CUeM1' Fel . B,'_ 5-Gel J66 3e 6Pbem eblflore JapermeBWbF._ .-I I Z 1 z M N 3 m K 3 - N m sD~ 36~DM~ - ~ INV= 5434.31 na" - N~s DID I T I - 1. All formal landscaping will be served by a fully automatic, high efficiency " Irrlgatlon system. 2. Turf areas shall be seeded with Earth carpet tall fescue mix. LE(£fID " I` - !-3F Exletlw,. T2ee b RIDdir I N \ V ` A RHroved Exutln'4 Dram to N. Fopoeed Shsse T,ea raapoaetl EvwEMMXI Trm Fcpoeetl Qneme+ul Tree p.opo.ed BY,ube Pmwe Twf WOOD FENCE NTs Edge ' Nauva Ueee geed Prepared by: Submitted: August 19, 2004 2004 Revised; estaber 13, [1 77 „ TT 1 ,20 Revived; Marsh 2 2, 2005 0 40' ~n pr Pn W' U\ ltlLLltJ 11UC 1 l1Vll Revised: enuary 79, 2008 Revised; February 16, 2006 b///A/O 7lA//lY Reviseda April 17, 2006 T Revised; July 27, 2006 North Scaled"•40'-0" Revised: September 18, 2006 0.rchMupi AraGAaUAnd Cutpof -,.aaaom K$F ,m am m ` i Rml r e ,~W ~o am A.~ N m w ~ n~anwn.~a,me aomaimplarompi mirmOgams,pW, aaaaDoomaI Lan ,aFr,LV rx.+wea ea m mean. .ww<~w a- amo. aon awl, r ,mp+wuLraaw..l.m.,, ,.a> w. m.wz ~ ~ ..m. I,mmw ~m,.a,a TT TT T- y,-G 1. - vo®.m w N laM uDI , an 'ia OR am - w. m,alPoOi~ A of u W+w oa s +leRn rw1Lwm f a0&ir.' ab-D ~P w a a ..-loaDo f.a, a.. wou r. uwaa-om, w .er, am f7.-m DO. ~Y.yub lFi _ - ,R, nW.4arUB.6~ ,L N.+iw+[4Oa.6T n an any aug 9' "a r;.w an a. o, a. a n a., a a . a. y an o n Mroe--es-ee--oe--bs-'as°°be-bawc°m'tr+'w-~pn-iITExN3°°dT°'a'B°tY'L-DI \I: ~d on o fdl '0.0 a¢ °s a os as os a, m °s as os a. o ♦ - °.z °s ° 1 ,e a 11 +a "1 .11 o 6 os ,o +0 'its s x m a, o, DO D D 'DO .11 s „ •1] ,a a a, as i „ al 'D a ~DL ',a 1. 1. D D a, al Dot .,a ~ Ia a. 1. to a, a ! b a 3. t e I a I, a Do _.2.. , t rr s v zr or yd I .a a n a.+ y1 ,a 11 1 b:a$~. oc ,.f D 2a or '17 'D D 'ID '2a,Rp Ip 'a w E d oa a •ssrs.>A ni,. n •p i. ."~'n s \ \,:04' a, D -D3 o '17 '31 s~-s' a. a., EY S rJ1. s n ',a a -op I ea a a z ~e Bl n ~'aA 'OD '11 1 ~on oo a .4.; a Do on a. loo ,s za N-o a zo 44 ploo '00 D 'OD ~Oa '01 '0 _~;.•ufjf~j /•].l {s ! :I¢ on _ a 1~an a an on 'ar i - - , i ° a air, an o 'u D '2D xa x SST - a 2. 00°.f /-T yY' 3 a \ - o !°.0 'an 'a, D an on o, s ,eyx ' To, al $ n hz-u a, , I.♦ ~5 I a'P~ an 1_ an o °n < r' a a D 70 ~1A '2~ 'l 10 '2a "a '71 an ,.a ,Oi ,e „ ,f ae a r 11 1 'a '41 D o f "n , f B -^e.. ya~, 1 7 22 19L D 11 _ Rs Ik \ YY T b v j T e ~A4 ITS II I~10, ~b 3 a 2 a -iB Ill I? .'a DO .12 Io "D S k. w11 G -gin t ''m •.0 m o.o a., o oc-„ Y!,. -ap x. •zn b _ o as xa a>-.n a ? ',ate 2.. d1 la2~1 i" I. v,' ..a DO '2 •ac~, a air U. D. 'DO 'DA DO ~oo '14 'a. A I an an •an o., ~9 I• Y 3s-tf x. I# li Ia •u on Sara 3 'va T l9y° T1 ml b. 'o FzAAYK1IA A"B.-tu 'z. 0 'DO an a a a. a.fi - ~avrtrl4 'foe a5z lo'll' `lip cl an ♦ Om Y~'rs'xs fi gd •Ap a A. ,I~ NE 'w 4'x. l eri. r r z. S q s "a I. 'T a '5~ 21 11 'pa DA s. .,I ~"-1+ { 'oz R.tfl_L[vr Ill gn 0. t DID 'D on a n 1, z IF, xll I 1 a a 11 1 lo Do %I 'a an ° VS 1° .rla 3~ ~l 3 'x! ( _ Iplj}I AAA V-- lnl I~ §p,_. a + ,s 9n on~- z2 3 - 2 b iI a. dl a •+n d.a bn C'1 'Do d Iall' I-I 1 0YY. as •an Li J an ° ! b. a,o a+ b {i . ,nLH D "D 12 f ~ ' °s °s b 01l tea , ~ I 14 1 ID Ip "a an b a, a2 a. - ,s w. an n oo m a2 •nu 3., a , or•,! ,a Ir-T 1S t I'~ rr~i. : x. .an I o.° '4 53 '13 IF 'a an a an an o! .FI , a a Y~ IT u n. a z. 21 p s } s o.o ,11I!P..!1111! •fx? ' a. IA '32 'DD I, 'a a' "a on b. a, ! 1 A ,n ! Y s - a. q ao a .,a 4D ND 11 rffii~, 1 -5111'. oa n on bn aro a a }i-"'4A[ -a 1J ao / a. L•ILI a a z, >n 55 1? of In I. '2a 3 ~Da '11 'pa X6 3. ai f S J •an .On 'DA I °o b+ & 1. -ap as ,a v 'DA Io \ -iS 1. 'a 'a a i6 -11 'an 0a n, ! a •.a as I. 0a o. . 0. b. as a< as a. n. ,n as an o. '03 'G9 a. n♦ n., 0n 'D7 '06 '08 '09 1 - 1a 1. ,x 11 12 , L L I i *D 'pa *io DD , ~ I I. I e a a! ani rob an 'm Io 'Do -00 -b -60 am 0 00 ~i 'I, I-DI ,i . a.ua_..ns._sr-•aa~.e. 'ss ba. 1ie17 'a - I p •aa 'DO 'a 'DO 'DO -a D •OVPIiFRO' n E° 'Do b 1 n oa °a o2 ♦ '03 'Up 'DD oa 0 0• n a, o o o. b a.o an an no 'Do 'Do %D D DO an •no an an 0 a, ao on oo an oo no 00 0n an ao aD an e.o on as oa a.a o.a 0.0 oa 0n a 0a ea on 0a Do on on 00 o.a on on o0 an. io, oa on on ao ao oa On ,A o.0 0a on o0 0o. as oo a0 0 ool~ P o.. LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE SymLG label Q, cimom, H-pa, NompOpa Lamp. Fib Lummm LLF wo. AREALIGHTWI.1 ONE250WA17CLEAR C3 A 12 KSF22WM R3 3. SHORT. GITOR MEFALRALIOE 9392120f .1E5 20000 S]2 295 REFLECTOR. FIAT HORQONTAL POS. j GLASS LENS. AREA LIGHT WILL TYPE ONEDISCI O- AR 9 19 KSF3 2E9M TO S. SHORT. Camil MEFALHALIOE, 03021AtIE5 NOW IS 590 O REFLECTOR FIAT HOR120NTALPOS. GIASG LENS. 0.1]5M MEO PWSMATIC TVPEV 0 B G. GLOGEWITH CLEAR WmenslorlNw ASL390B.IE5 8000 0.72 2U O TEXTUREOTORANO TYPE 5 FEFI£CTOR AREA LIGHT-1 ONE CLEAA • E E HSFE 250M R3 HE 3,SHORLCLROFF REFL METAL HKIOE -12110 ES 00W0 0]1 Z35 WMOUSEVIDESRIELO, SpI£ONTAL ROG FIAT GI LENS. NGOUTI iIHG *~aoRnd PHOTOMETRIC PLAN . S £ t.b IS STATISTICS 1$ ."Dom"'. 9ymWl A,y Mu ha, mi G.Ia2ore%1 } 11D, 67k NIA 12 I i I a~ F ~ U~ o~ e ¢ mm Zw„ mm Wxa Zq~8s Z" W m B 'LW s°o E Qa . J E t 7- C-) ai D U O O 3.1 W J a 18 , 1 PM 41 /i y -7 , I~ t, 1 nT Xq L - - - - - - - - - - - - j ~1✓ 11 t7~ _ M dKn n+ aroo jy-0 ~13cr32 - - PiV2rttge 60 ef 6(u1dr;~ 35---- i - V i I1 F7777~\ t184. .0 (1124-0 + 12Qi o -t 52DL. -112Lo`( ~yj. _ 3 34t26t 31 4 52 h`?oi _ `7 J_ +5_LO \ t=50.0--_ - -______-1.. 3 ' v~ V 'W 0 _ 6u~tddl+ He~a(wt ca(cu4ations prQliminary groAio j pan \ : - \ \ huq*s 17, 2m5 ~ \ scan ism o~ 1 L 0 100 200 Feet TOPOGRAPHIC S OF TRACT 22 AND THE W-1 /2 OF TRACT - LOCATED IN THE NW-1 /4 O TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFE SHEET 1 OF 1 i ~ APPLE WOOD KNOLLS 12TH FILING Q PORTION OF TRACT 12 ~ ~ BROOKSIDE SUBDIVISION ~ LOT 1 LOT 2 ZONED R-1 LOT 3 LOT 4 LOT 5 RIM = 5418.07 ~ Q INV (15") IN = 5410.07 Z N INV (18") OUT = 5409.77 ~ ~ .t-. _a u7 FND 5/8" REBAR TELEPHONE BOX SS SS W~A~UM. CAP SS N ~ S ~ v LANE ENGR. LS 438 ~1 / MP ~ _ f x s ~ - - - - ~v'-_ _ - - ~ _ ~ 1 i i ~ ~x`i ~ 1 RIM = 542.27 \ ~ ~ ~ In INV IN = 5412.67 ~ ? ~ ` ~ ~ INV OUT X412.57 ~ a RIM = 5420.04 INV IN = 5410,$4 ~ ~ ~ - \ INV OUT = 5410.74 ~ ~ ~ ~C PORTION OF TRACT 1~ / ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ , ) y~ ,x ~ \ \ ~ ~ ~ ( ~ ~ BROOKSIDE SUBDIVISION ~ / ~ ZON~ Y~~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ tui 1~,~ ~ 8') \SANITARY S~WER ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ EASEMENT ~ \ ~ ~ } \ \~~~1~ ~ \ ~ BK. X39, P`. 40$~ `r s. SS SS g» \k ~ ~ 6~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ \ 'i big RIM - 5419.81 ~ li ~ ~ ~ . INV IN = 5411.01 ~ \ \ ~ M'I i~~ ~ ~'~,~I,i~. \ ~ ~ \ \ \ INV OUT = 541x.91 Ul ~ ~a ~ 1 J . ~ ~ d ¢ r. ~a ~ ~ a. - ~ ~ f `^7> x ! t ~ ~~ji ! 4~. / 1 ~ t.... f Y i ~ ~ I / \ i... i....,. f 1 V ~ V a ~~'X ~ ~ (C . ~ . ~ ` , ` RIM = 5421.02 I , ~ ~ t ~E ~ ~ INV ~N = 5413.12 i ' ~ r1 / 3 llii ~ C> A y S INV OUT = 5413.22 ~ 1 ~ r ~ ~k Q i ~ ~ f ff ~ ~ 3,~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ v~ ~ ~ PORTION OF TRACT 11 ~ ~ " ~ ~~i'''~t,,cn ~ ~ ~ r- ~ LL CONCRETE t. BROOKSIDE~ UBDIVISION ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ZONED RS1 - ACCESS A`RJ~ ' ~ \ / ~ S ~Q,, ~ I AI N TE~I ACE ~ ~~i _ ~ ` f ~ PARKING L~}T v'" t ~ 1 p,, ~ P J'' ✓ \ ~ -4 ~ 1 i r 3 ! i 1 t i I t t. I f ! \ S ~ REC. OS 02082~69~~ `I~~ ~ ~ \ / .~j P i ~t _s RIM = 5422.28 ~ x ~ ~ ` ~ l ~ ~ / r i INV IN = 5410.08 I I' ~ ~f 'V INV OUT = 5409.48 cn ~ X x r„~ ~ ~ J f~% ~ / _ _ ~ J N ~(C ~ k \ / i RIM = TRACT B ~ I; ~ x ~ i~\ ~t ~ I INV IN BANZHAF SUBDIVISION ~ `I ~ ~ ~ INV O ti~ \ \ x ~F ZONED R-1 00 ~.:.w~~ ,,,,7,~ ~c \ 1~1 ~"f \ ~ \ 16 SAf 16' SANITARY SEWER ~ / N ~ ~ j` i s-, - i i i ~ ~ ~ .I EASEMENT \ Ivy I II~f ~ cNn BK. 1616, PG. 158 ~f ~ ~ - ~~~~~~~~~M~t ` X 1 t~ L 1 i 1 ~~'--'~r _I_ ~ •t RIM = 5422.75 I \ ~ i .o PORTION OF TRACT 10 ~ ~ ~ INV IN = 5414.55 ~ \ ~ ~ NN BROOKSIDE SUBDIVISION ~ INV OUT = 5414.45 ~ j ai ZONED R-1 ~ ~ ~ ~ FND 5/8" REBAR INV\ 35417.95 t~~ f I 1 ~ ~ W/PLASTIC CAP LS 17669 ~--r L s t J LEGEN D ~ . i r . t ~ ° ° ~ ~ WOOD FENCE E- - x- x- x- x- x- x- WIRE FENCE O ~ ` ~r 1 ti .e-° - - -w- - -w- - - WATER LINE ~ S~ Y . e 1 J ss ss SANITARY SEWER LINE ~ V f _ _ -----SO-----SD----- STORM DRAIN LINE ~ 4 P ~ GAS LINE 1 r { off OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE L. t uE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE a A ]i GUY WIRE D4 1  DOUGLAS R. BERUNG DATE NKjL~ °LP~ A 17-, 2a~ ~ WATFR AAANHnI F PI ~ 34594 ,1• 5,-'00 0 ION ACT Vi s )F ~ i r ~ /44C C-4 A 11 ___.__.~___w..__ { ~ n V } i .r r w. ,+~~9 ~ ..gym,. ~vN .w... c ~ ~l a w^"^ ~~q r,. n f s.~ rrrr r ~ ~ 1 n~i 'J of y / / Q~~ , / ~ "l ...w «r .w- .r r a .n d'• ~IJ~ N.~ .w.~ Sn ~m+ y y J r r^' S' r f '~i - - . _ t r RAM ,r,~- ~,,W w d' rwrr ~ x L'~ r arr arir ,f. 'r ` ""a.~.+~-fin .,n, ..r~:s. ~,y wt r ~ +:+:w+nn~..w~.w ~ fin"" ..+,n,, ' w'^..; +...r ~ ~ f .,.,.r..n.r.+wrn+wr~f .......rte .r+.r~w!!ri: l 'Ir r,a` tJ`:~f~( ~',,,,,,,J ~ .sue ~ ? ~ hx d r M,_ N,.,, ,s ^t ~Z ~ =L. e !r ? ,~.n r ~ , „d' ~ v`i: t { ' F~~, * Y^P.Y r ' f J ~l` ` N'~ ~ J '"4, 1 ~ r n :~1 . ; ,n,r . 'u'.,~ r 1 l` ~e~ w. ~ Y. rv~~ ,ter ~ t}. ''1 r ? { f i ,rs ~ > ,f r, Is 7 i r/. ~ ~ ~ z 1 V i ~ z, ~ .r°` ii ti 7 M ~ .F.`A 7 1 F ~ C i .1 Yb7 w 7?~ ~ ~ M... ~ ; . F ~r n Y ~ { { ((yy~ ! .•i yip { 1 i~/ a S .l ~ ~ 'F. ~l f~ 2{r~ r i t ~ n y ~ P r. t K J l~ ~J S ~4 Nfv~'~ Sa ,l~ r ..J ~ .Fr it ~ r /r M ' . r ~ Y' , . , f i ~ ~ k . ' : , ~i- 1 7 r.`i ~ <t e~ i~J f~ j Y ~ l ~/f ' ~ E 1e l s~ rr ki 1 Z S ~'t 1 r { ~/!.if ~ " ,r' ~ M1J J ± k P ~ `t . z, ,n•,~ r ~ } °J ~ % 'F r ' i 1 "h i_ { Y4, t 1 F i'a ~ i i ..~1~ 3~ 1 ~F 4 i C~ S. 1~ ,r/' ~ a i ~ a 4 ~ - V Y . ~ ~ ~ } J 1 4 ~ ••''ti l ~2 / ~ y t i ~i F ~ R 1. ggi 0.5, 'f 0u I ~ ~ ~~i ; v f $ ~.Y p A rr< i i C 4, . ~'t f ~~1. rte, ~ ) 7 ` ~ /o „N =~f' f ~ 4 ~ t 4M 1 e . i ~ v f ~ 1 ~ ~ ww t` ` 4 n.. ~ l ? ,,I* ~ tit i ~ r I Y ~i i Y" i ) tt~ `l _ ; ~ ~ i f ; ~ r.N F, s l r ~ 3 i i' S~ ~ `t h. ~ ` ` f 2 "y I i I 1 Y Y 8 ~ r. ~ ~ ' a _ ~ t • ~ E i~ it F 'j... z.r j i• 1 i r~ ~ , ~ ~'-m~y* ~ N _ . „w k _ _ , l • `"a 'f t` " „'s. i f { i ' . f ` ,4 i , `F~ r.-.f 'iF"^ ~ ~.nx.~ C l 3 ~M~ 1 1 ~h, ,5~ ~ ~ 'i~ F y..! > i F:~ ' it 4WD...,, , i~ ~1~: e` ~t ~'Sw ~ `i i r'~• "•v.fi' 4. ~t y Y A j ) 4 1 ,,t , i ~~f. ' s t W s. Yt ~L `I ~ ~ y c f ~1 _ , 5 S V~ `y `f 4', t• t. ~ ~ ~S ~ a nia~ t- 6, q` t M1 ' ~ ~ 1 2 i ~ 'i ' 1 1~ 'z~. u ~ 'Z T~~ t f i% { i ~ 'S t 1 i i ~y 1 L P r 4 i~ i~ L~ 1 v r ' S H[ 1 4 1 IS f ~ i 1. ~ / } t ` ~t 1 t i Fr,_ 3 k j: c ' ; n Z ~ . ~ - r~ i 5 f- ~r r.,. I, S ~ :IMIIAI ii p1111~M ffOi! I~fil i . . g 9 o ' ` l 1 ~1. 1 i~ 5 1 r i 1 , t i:~  " w- APPLEWOOD BAPTIST wt NORTH POUW & ASSOCIATES, INC. o ~51 30, 6o special R90 East 9th--, Avenue SCALE: 1 " = 30' Sufte 250 Denver, CaRiorado 80203 303-296-4343 f ~ i N V~~~ ® ? ~m ~ _ _ e....,,...-. t~_.. , - j r, - ~ c :~r .r. Z~.,~~--- - - - a~ . J r ,.r,, - 67.00' 1 1 ~ f- RIM = 5421.27 >r- 512.67 ~ , \ ~S~ 541 2.57 ~:g .1, w • m e • . . 9 8.20' • • ~ ~ ~ y ~l, ~ + . • ~ \ _ 1 ~ ~ ti S ~ EXISTINCx / , TREE TO _ , ~ REM,4 (N ~ ~ 8' SANITA~ZY SEU'JER (tYP.~ ~ R EASEMENT r ~ ~ BKv 939, P`G. 404, ~ ~ ~ NOTE: SEWER LINE, NOT ~ , . ~ ~ ~ IN EASEMENT. ~t \ ~ ~ 24" ~ • - ' _ ~ \ cP \ 0' PSC(~ l1Tll I EASEME --~i ~ EC. N0. 841125 PG 3 t r ~ Wood Fence 1 ~ \ L . t ~ ~ \ w 3 P 2 PG 3 BP 3 Cz S TLS 3 PP --~=5 2 P u~C ~ Z .~+'e~ ~ ~n~ _ _ _ ~ . ~t~Gi'F, 'Y~C.~. ~E'~ET.~,...~.f.~l,:.,a~'b'~ ~R~~ r a ~ ~ 1 ~ ; 1 ~ Y ~ ~ ~ c,~ 1~ i ~ ~ j._ I ~ ~ RIM = 5421.02 {i r r ~ ~ ~ ♦ INV IN = 5413.12 ~ ~ ~ INV OUT = 5413.22 ll } ~ f ~ ....L~1.. _ ~ a 5432 1~ .~4._ T~~IT - . f' S~MENT ACCESS AND ~ ~ _.r. _ ~+d"1r~ .rw"\... f~E~. ~42~OC} MAINTENANCE \ S • _ _ EASEMENT ~ ~ _ >C T 1~ _ _ T~~~ TC~ - _ ' 08269 - 2 IN - r CT'x'~='.~ ,1 S00°33'4"~. ~ ~ ~ S5J -P - ~ 8.2 ~ w \ - . _ . . o 1 , J S00 33 14 E - ~ ~ ~o ~ ,4REA NOT YO BE OfSTURBEO ~ \ = _ 4`~ 16.00' S00°33'14"~ _ o o, 16:8/ a = - ~ ~G' ~ ~ s43~ L ~r / ~ s i e ~\l (/J ~ I ~ ~ ~ O RIM = 542201 ~ mow.... C~~~ / INV IN = 5413.21 0 S~ =T 1 i ~ r . ~o ' ' ~ ~ INV OUT = 5413.`1 o _ _ . Sh1 . , , . . , ' ms ~ 1 ~-n ' \ \ / N 16' SANITARY SEWER ` • N . I ~ ' ~ I ...EASEMENT . ~ F_ ~ ~ ~ / ~ SKI. 964, PG. 580 , ~r ~ NC~t~ o w ~,~'~~N • 433 f N ~ 4S SD ` SD DS ' SD DS SD 4S - 0 4S . ~ • . ~S SD 4S ~ SD ~ 4S SD = S00°34'33"E `18^i.51' RIM = 5422.75 STO M MH i iNV iN = 54~ 4.55 \ _ S00°34'33"E RIM= 5428.86 i14.lT~ 1►~-rr~iw~utir w~ovf+ 1 GT i ~ 1 SEEDING AND MULCHING INSTALLATION NOTES SEEDING AND MULCHING M 1. SEE PLAN VIEW FOR: 1. SEEDED AND -AREA OF SEEDING AND MULCHING. FOR A PERIOD OF TV TYPE OF SEED MIX (PERMANENT, TEMPORARY, OR LOW-GROWTH). MULCHING SHALL BE 'I 1 _ + , r- 1 i ♦s~ 2. ALL BRANDS FURNISHED SHALL BE FREE FROM ALL NOXIOUS SEEDS INCLUDING RUSSIAN OR TO MEET THE REQUI CANADIAN THISTLE, COARSE FESCUE, EUROPEAN BINDWEED, JOHNSON GRASS, KNAP WEED AND LEAFY 2, REQUIRED CO SPURGE. BE DEFINED AS FOLL y' T U .r e 3. THE SEEDER SHALL FURNISH TO THE CONTRACTOR A SIGNED STATEMENT CERTIFYING THAT THE 1. THREE ( SEED FURNISHED IS FROM A LOT THAT HAS BEEN TESTED BY A RECOGNIZED LABORATORY. SEED PLANTS WHICH HAS BECOME WET, MOLDY, OR OTHERWISE DAMAGED IN TRANSIT OR IN STORAGE WILL NOT BE APPROV ACCEPTABLE. SEED TICKETS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY UPON REQUEST. 2. NO BARE b i • ~t d. 4. DRILL SEEDING MIX SHALL CONFORM TO THE TABLE ON THE RIGHT: 3. FREE OF ~ _ f. . - 5. IF THE SEED AVAILABLE ON THE MARKET DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM PURITY AND 4. FREE FR GERMINATION PERCENTAGES SPECIFIED, THE SUBCONTRACTOR MUST COMPENSATE FOR A LESSER GESC C PERCENTAGE OF PURITY OR GERMINATION BY FURNISHING SUFFICIENT ADDITIONAL SEED TO EQUAL ,1 t i b 1 THE SPECIFIED PRODUCT. THE TAGS FROM THE SEED MIXES MUST BE SUPPLIED TO CONTRACTOR AND 3. REQUIRED CO FORWARDED TO THE CITY GESC INSPECTOR. 1. AT LEAS 6. THE FORMUW USED FOR DETERMINING THE QUANTITY OF PURE LIVE SEED (PLS) SHALL BE 2. NO BARE f (POUNDS OF SEED) X (PURITY) X (GERMINATION) =POUNDS OF PURE LIVE SEED {PLS). 3. FREE OF t _ + ~ _ i 7. PERMANENT SEED MIX SHALL BE USED UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE CITY. 4. FREE FR 8. ALL AREAS TO BE SEEDED AND MULCHED SHALL HAVE NATIVE TOPSOIL OR APPROVED SOIL GESC C AMENDMENTS SPREAD TO A DEPTH OF AT LEAST 6 INCHES (LOOSE DEPTH). HAUL ROADS AND OTHER 4. RILL AND GULL 1 j 1$ t COMPACTED AREAS SHALL BE LOOSENED TO A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES PRIOR TO SPREADING TOPSOIL. RESEEDING METHO 9. SOIL IS TO BE THOROUGHLY LOOSENED (TILLED) TO A DEPTH OF AT LEAST 6 INCHES PRIOR TO i _Y 4 SEEDING. THE TOP 6 INCHES C F THE SEED BED SHALL BE FREE OF ROCKS GREATER THAN 4 INCHES y AND SOIL CLODS GREATER THAN 2 INCHES. SEEDING OVER ANY COMPACTED AREAS THAT HAVEN'T LOYIuwGROWTH DRILL SEEDING MIX codes Quan. Sym. Scientific Name Common Name ' • size ~ . w ,w Fescue Turf ••a BEEN THOROUGHLY LOOSENED SHALL BE REJECTED. SPECI 10. SEED IS TO BE APPLIED USING A MECHANICAL DRILL TO A DEPTH OF 1(4 INCH. ROW SPACING Folius Pekin cotoneastor ••t• 1 ~a Edeer SHALL BE NO MORE THAN 6 INCHES. MATERIAL USED FOR MULCH SHALL CONSIST OF LONG-STEMMED BUFFALOGF mera ld Ga let ' ~ stet Emerald ~ uon mua 5-Ga 1 STRAW. AT LEAST 50 PERCENT OF THE MULCH, BY WEIGHT, SHALL BE 10 INCHES OR MORE IN LENGTH. ! ~fe tbw~wre see iriaL° 41 Ib awn i ~l~.t•www wr I I (a i..w ~.~lLe. ir»n G i" : 1 9 • * ~ w 1 9. w ~ C_► a ~ MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED AND MECHANICALLY ANCHORED TO A DEPTH OF AT LEAST 2 INCHES. MULCH BLUE GRA J SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF 4000 LB. OF STRAW PER ACRE. ESTE 11. IF THE PERMITTEE DEMONSTRATES TO THE CITY THAT IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO DRILL SEED, SEED IS TO BE UNIFORMLY BROADCAST AT TWO TIMES THE DRILLED RATE, THEN LIGHTLY HARROWED TO WHEATGF PROVIDE A SEED DEPTH OF APPROXIMATELY 1/4 INCH, THEN ROLLED TO COMPACT, THEN MULCHED AS SIDEOATS GI SPECIFIED ABOVE. THICKSPI 12. SEEDING AND MULCHING SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF INITIAL EXPOSURE OR 7 DAYS WHEATG AFTER GRADING IS SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETE W A GIVEN AREA (AS DEFINED BY THE CITY). THIS MAY STREAMB/ J Prepared by. REQUIRE MULTIPLE MOBILIZATIONS FOR SEEDING AND MULCHING. WHEATGR 13. MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED WITHIN 24-HOURS OF SEEDING. 14. TACKIFIER SHOULD BE UTILIZED TO HELP WITH STRAW DISPLACEMENT. 0 4' 80, I N C 0 R P 0 R A T PE Q LANDSCAPE ARCH ITTECTURE LANTZ ASSOCIATES 13335 W. 72ni Cir. Alva 4 CO 80005 (303) 887-3714 (303) 4234949 fax July 28, 2006 Steve Nguyen Engineering Manager City of Wheat Ridge 7500 W 29P Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 RE: Applewood Baptist Church July 2006 Revisions Dear Steve, Attached are revised pages for the Traffic Impact Study for the Applewood Baptist Church. The changes reflect the west driveway being relocated 150' east of Robb St and the elimination of the access to the single family homes along the extension of Robb St north of the Church. The traffic volumes reflect the deletion of the trips for the single family homes. The trips were also reassigned to reflect the new access location and the resulting internal circulation. As the Level of Service analysis shows, all movements are at LOS C or better in both the near term and in 20 yrs. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Fred Lantz, P.E. Cc: Stan Pouw Meredith Reckert KQj Applewood Baptist Church Revised Traffic Impact Study Access/Intersection LOS Access/Intersection Movement Existing LOS LOS with Addition LOS in Future (20yrs) Sun Wed Sun Wed Sun Wed 32" Ave & Robb St A A A A A A WB Left A A A A A A NB B B B B B B North Side - Western A A A A A A EB Left A A A A A A SB B A B B B B NorthSide - Middle A A EB Left A A - - - SB B B South Side A A A A A A West Left A A A A A A NB Left B B B B B C NB Right A B A B B B North Side - East A A A A A A EB Left A A A A A A SB B A B A B B 32 Ave & Quail (south) A A A A A A WB Left A A A A A A NB Left B B B B B C NB Right A B A B B B 32" Ave & Quail (north) A A A A A A EB Left A A A A A A SB B B B B B B July 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES 20 Figure 5 Applewood Baptist Church Sun AM with Ed Building U) z T T f0 N N C3 W z Mm 10 so X 8 s X E 189 1 X A 230 32nd Ave ~e 198 217 224 Noz276~ 2 221 z5~ 254- 28x4 23 19 y cnM ~rn ~ N A 6 5 w o m a U) z 0 July 2006 Rev LANTZ ASSOCIATES Page 15 Figure 6 Applewood Baptist Church Wed PM with Ed Building z z m ~ ` 0 0 co N N d W z 8 so X 2 4 N X N N C-23~ X A 230 32nd Ave 245 23 260 9J 374 ~m37z 3 6J , 339 4J 3 -1 34" 36 ~ 22 y N M ~ M N 3 ~ 9 > m v L J O July 2006 Rev LANTZ ASSOCIATES Page 16 Figure 8 Applewood Baptist Church Wed FM - 20 yr U) z m m 0 0 y N W z w 32 eo v 34 X3 4" s' X277 32nd Ave 's' X319 X364 45q~ ~.42o-+ 386-1 39o- 368-t 40o- 40 24 N <O M A 3 s o > o ~ m v U) L_ J O July 2006 Rev LANTZ ASSOCIATES Page 18 Figure 7 Applewood Baptist Church Sun AM - 20 yr z z T T t0 (0 3 3 m ~ 0 o m 0 w z 12 OD OD 32 N N i 419 m~ X240 32nd Ave X191 " X 20 X234 4 284 zs4-- 272-$ 348~ ~4 a s 23 21 vv ~M N 3 ~5 9 > ~ O O U) t 3 O July 2006 Rev LANTZ ASSOCIATES Page 17 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: 32nd Ave & Robb St Sun AM with Ed Building 7 4~ F 4\ P Lane Configurations I ? Y Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 224 2 3 260 12 8 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 243 2 3 283 13 9 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 246 534 245 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 97 99 cM capacity (veh/h) 1320 506 794 Plretirti,.Lanea#... K ',EB 1 „ WB 1,;, WBf?.,,+ Volume Total 246 3 283 22 Volume Left 0 3 0 13 Volume Right 2 0 0 9 cSH 1700 1320 1700 592 Volume to Capacity 0.14 0.00 0.17 0.04 Queue Length (ft) 0 0 0 3 Control Delay (s) 0.0 7.7 0.0 11.3 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.1 11.3 Approach LOS B Average Delay 0.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 24.9% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church July 2006 Rev LANTZ ASSOCIATES HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: 32nd Ave & West Driveway Sun AM with Ed Building ~rlgyement ::x.m!', . EBL ,EBT,,y116`T. y11BR',,.5¢L, ,SBR ,4't ' Lane Configurations T Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 7 225 230 10 19 33 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 8 245 250 11 21 36 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (f /s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 261 515 255 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 99 96 95 cM capacity (veh/h) 1304 517 783 bir'eciop;;Lanel.#, >Y. .vi. A.., e Volume Total 8 245 261 57 Volume Left 8 0 0 21 Volume Right 0 0 11 36 cSH 1304 1700 1700 659 Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.14 0.15 0.09 Queue Length (ft) 0 0 0 7 Control Delay (s) 7.8 0.0 0.0 11.0 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay (s) 0.2 0.0 11.0 Approach LOS B Average Delay 1.2 Intersection Capacity Uti lization 23.8% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church July 2006 Rev LANTZ ASSOCIATES HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: 32nd Ave & South Side Driveway Sun AM with Ed Building Lane Configurations T+ I T T1 F Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 221 23 8 203 37 36 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 240 25 9 221 40 39 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 265 491 253 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 99 92 95 cM capacity (veh/h) 1299 533 786 Volume Total 265 9 221 40 39 Volume Left 0 9 0 40 0 Volume Right 25 0 0 0 39 cSH 1700 1299 1700 533 786 Volume to Capacity 0.16 0.01 0.13 0.08 0.05 Queue Length (ft) 0 1 0 6 4 Control Delay (s) 0.0 7.8 0.0 12.3 9.8 Lane LOS A B A Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.3 11.1 Approach LOS B Intersection Capacity Utilization 24.2% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church July 2006 Rev LANTZ ASSOCIATES HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: 32nd Ave & East Driveway - NS Sun AM with Ed Building Lane Configurations I T T+ Y Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 1 256 198 8 17 13 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 1 278 215 9 18 14 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 224 500 220 vC1, stage 1 confvol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 97 98 cM capacity (veh/h) 1345 530 820 Volume Total 1 278 224 33 Volume Left 1 0 0 18 Volume Right 0 0 9 14 cSH 1345 1700 1700 626 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.16 0.13 0.05 Queue Length (ft) 0 0 0 4 Control Delay (s) 7.7 0.0 0.0 11.1 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 11.1 Approach LOS B Intersection Capacity Utilization 24.6% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church July 2006 Rev LANTZ ASSOCIATES HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 13: 32nd Ave & Quail St Sun AM with Ed Building Mgvement „1NBT , NL NBR, Lane Configurations Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 254 19 29 189 17 29 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h ) 276 21 32 205 18 32 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 297 555 286 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 98 96 96 cM capacity (veh/h) 1265 481 753 Volume Total 297 32 205 18 32 Volume Left 0 32 0 18 0 Volume Right 21 0 0 0 32 cSH 1700 1265 1700 481 753 Volume to Capacity 0.17 0.02 0.12 0.04 0.04 Queue Length (ft) 0 2 0 3 3 Control Delay (s) 0.0 7.9 0.0 12.8 10.0 Lane LOS A B A Approach Delay (s) 0.0 1.1 11.0 Approach LOS B t~{}~ ryfg 1~~ Ir ter !d lffl~ 14 tI} I dt fp , 3 t' l ~ ' € I SF [I1 4T It 'Y 1- 1{ .i(t S 1 ~g A # 4 i ) .G 9tt tt *+vF arinn F . ~ 4 fW . .61rvd fk ii «t L «r M n. S Average Delay 1.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 25.8% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church July 2006 Rev LANTZ ASSOCIATES HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: 32nd Ave & N Quail Sun AM with Ed Building t ti r i , SQL< EBL EBT WBT VRr SBR Moyetllet~t t r f... Lane Configurations I . , T , T, . , Y . Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 1 282 217 1 5 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 1 307 236 1 5 1 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 237 545 236 vC1, stage 1 confvol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 99 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 1330 499 803 D~reeti4n,rLane,, . EB,1 EB 2(;..WB, i . Volume Total 1 307 237 7 Volume Left 1 0 0 5 Volume Right 0 0 1 1 cSH 1330 1700 1700 532 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.18 0.14 0.01 Queue Length (ft) 0 0 0 1 Control Delay (s) 7.7 0.0 0.0 11.8 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 11.8 Approach LOS B lrtte~c~Loh'Symfna r' Average Delay 0.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 26.1% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church July 2006 Rev LANTZ ASSOCIATES HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: 32nd Ave & Robb St Wed PM with Ed Building 7 tAll ivloyean~nt_, - Lane Configurations ll~ Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 373 4 4 260 6 8 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 405 4 4 283 7 9 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 410 699 408 vC1, stage 1 confvol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 98 99 cM capacity (veh/h) 1149 405 644 WB Volume Total 410 4 283 15 Volume Left 0 4 0 7 Volume Right 4 0 0 9 cSH 1700 1149 1700 514 Volume to Capacity 0.24 0.00 0.17 0.03 Queue Length (ft) 0 0 0 2 Control Delay (s) 0.0 8.1 0.0 12.2 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.1 12.2 Approach LOS B (nte~S~ r~ohsBarftn2rY~ Average Delay 0.3 Intersection Capacity Uti lization 31.6% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church July 2006 Rev LANTZ ASSOCIATES HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: 32nd Ave & West Driveway Wed PM with Ed Building t ti r Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 9 372 230 8 1 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 10 404 250 9 1 5 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 259 678 254 vC1, stage 1 confvol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 99 100 99 cM capacity (veh/h) 1306 414 784 011e, ,ilt 5110"XI E82„.ly, y1~ pgi,6.~ Volume Total 10 404 259 7 Volume Left 10 0 0 1 Volume Right 0 0 9 5 cSH 1306 1700 1700 683 Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.24 0.15 0.01 Queue Length (ft) 1 0 0 1 Control Delay (s) 7.8 0.0 0.0 10.3 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay (s) 0.2 0.0 10.3 Approach LOS B Average Delay 0.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 31.3% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church July 2006 Rev LANTZ ASSOCIATES HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: 32nd Ave & South Side Driveway Wed PM with Ed Building „EB7„ FBR uuBL Ul6T . , MBL ._NBR . . Lane Configurations } Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 337 36 23 224 14 8 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 366 39 25 243 15 9 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 405 679 386 vC1, stage 1 confvol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 98 96 99 cM capacity (veh/h) 1153 408 662 Volume Total 405 25 243 15 9 Volume Left 0 25 0 15 0 Volume Right 39 0 0 0 9 cSH 1700 1153 1700 408 662 Volume to Capacity 0.24 0.02 0.14 0.04 0.01 Queue Length (ft) 0 2 0 3 1 Control Delay (s) 0.0 8.2 0.0 14.2 10.5 Lane LOS A B B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.8 12.8 Approach LOS B Average Delay 0.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 31.7% IC U Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church July 2006 Rev LANTZ ASSOCIATES HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: 32nd Ave & East Driveway - NS Wed PM with Ed Building ' F t ti d . Lane Configurations I T T+ Y Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 6 339 245 5 0 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 7 368 266 5 0 2 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft1s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 272 651 269 vC1, stage 1 confvol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 99 100 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 1292 431 770 W Volume Total 7 368 272 2 Volume Left 7 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 0 5 2 cSH 1292 1700 1700 770 Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.22 0.16 0.00 Queue Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 Control Delay (s) 7.8 0.0 0.0 9.7 Lane LOS A A Approach Delay (s) 0.1 0.0 9.7 Approach LOS A ~trfR~pr~l~lY { , Average Delay 0.1 Intersection Capacity Util ization 29.4% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church July 2006 Rev LANTZ ASSOCIATES HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 13: 32nd Ave & Quail St Wed PM with Ed Building )fAQV„er~e0t ~ " .,o J ~BT , EBR...utr13L, .,W~T....Ne4-':N_BR ' ' Lane Configurations + Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 317 22 24 238 12 33 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 345 24 26 259 13 36 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 368 667 357 vC1, stage 1 confvol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 98 97 95 cM capacity (veh/h) 1190 414 688 Dir fl?n„k1n. . 02 ' .":I" 1"Li N0.' 2a, ` Volume Total 368 26 259 13 36 Volume Left 0 26 0 13 0 Volume Right 24 0 0 0 36 cSH 1700 1190 1700 414 688 Volume to Capacity 0.22 0.02 0.15 0.03 0.05 Queue Length (ft) 0 2 0 2 4 Control Delay (s) 0.0 8.1 0.0 14.0 10.5 Lane LOS A B B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.7 11.4 Approach LOS B f t, io S m E a f Y w ct ni um I r+~ r', T ' i ; , r f , r . . . . „ . ,~4 ~K , . w,. , , Average Delay 1.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 29.6% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church July 2006 Rev LANTZ ASSOCIATES HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: 32nd Ave & N Quail Wed PM with Ed Building t ti / Lane Configurations Sign Control Grade Volume (veh/h) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (veh/h) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume vC1, stage 1 confvol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) p0 queue free % cM capacity (veh/h) Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right cSH Volume to Capacity Queue Length (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS I t T+ Y Free Free Stop 0% 0% 0% 4 346 260 1 2 2 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 4 376 283 1 2 2 284 None 668 283 4.1 6.4 6.2 2.2 3.5 3.3 100 99 100 1279 422 756 4 376 284 4 4 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 1279 1700 1700 542 0.00 0.22 0.17 0.01 0 0 0 1 7.8 0.0 0.0 11.7 A B 0.1 0.0 11.7 B Intersection Capacity Utilization 29.8% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church July 2006 Rev LANTZ ASSOCIATES HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: 32nd Ave & Robb St Sun AM - 20 yr Lane Configurations T3, Vi t Y Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 284 4 4 319 20 10 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 309 4 4 347 22 11 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 313 666 311 vC1, stage 1 confvol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 95 99 cM capacity (veh/h) 1247 423 729 ;U Total 313 4 347 33 Volume Left 0 4 0 22 Volume Right 4 0 0 11 cSH 1700 1247 1700 492 Volume to Capacity 0.18 0.00 0.20 0.07 Queue Length (ft) 0 0 0 5 Control Delay (s) 0.0 7.9 0.0 12.8 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.1 12.8 Approach LOS B Average Delay 0.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 28.2% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church July 2006 Rev LANTZ ASSOCIATES HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: 32nd Ave & West Driveway Sun AM - 20 yr t ~ ~ ti r Lane Configurations Sign Control Grade Volume (veh/h) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (veh/h) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) p0 queue free % cM capacity (veh/h) Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right cSH Volume to Capacity Queue Length (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS f T* Y Free Free Stop 0% 0% 0% 43 251 240 12 44 83 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 47 273 261 13 48 90 None 634 267 274 4.1 6.4 6.2 2.2 3.5 3.3 96 89 88 1289 427 771 47 273 274 138 47 0 0 48 0 0 13 90 1289 1700 1700 603 0.04 0.16 0.16 0.23 3 0 0 22 7.9 0.0 0.0 12.7 A B 1.2 0.0 12.7 B Average Delay 2.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 29.4% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church July 2006 Rev LANTZ ASSOCIATES HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: 32nd Ave & South Side Driveway Sun AM - 20 yr Movement, , EBT„ Mk - WBL 1NBT NBL( 'NCR Lane Configurations Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 272 23 8 211 41 40 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 296 25 9 229 45 43 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 321 555 308 vC1, stage 1 confvol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 99 91 94 cM capacity (veh/h) 1239 489 732 Ali pirect)4n,,Lane:#i ,'s. , ,.'.S 1., WB. uW6{2,,.. Volume Total 321 9 229 45 43 Volume Left 0 9 0 45 0 Volume Right 25 0 0 0 43 cSH 1700 1239 1700 489 732 Volume to Capacity 0.19 0.01 0.13 0.09 0.06 Queue Length (ft) 0 1 0 7 5 Control Delay (s) 0.0 7.9 0.0 13.1 10.2 Lane LOS A B B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.3 11.7 Approach LOS B Average Delay 1.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.1% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church July 2006 Rev LANTZ ASSOCIATES HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: 32nd Ave & East Driveway - NS Sun AM - 20 yr ' --i~ t t \r r/ Lane Configurations Sign Control Grade Volume (veh/h) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (veh/h) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) p0 queue free % cM capacity (veh/h) Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right cSH Volume to Capacity Queue Length (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Free Free Stop 0% 0% 0% 1 311 191 32 58 28 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 1 338 208 35 63 30 242 None 565 225 4.1 6.4 6.2 2.2 3.5 3.3 100 87 96 1324 486 814 1 338 242 93 1 0 0 63 0 0 35 30 1324 1700 1700 559 0.00 0.20 0.14 0.17 0 0 0 15 7.7 0.0 0.0 12.7 A B 0.0 0.0 12.7 B Intersection Capacity Utilization 1.8 29.8% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church July 2006 Rev LANTZ ASSOCIATES HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 13: 32nd Ave & Quail St Sun AM - 20 yr Lane Configurations T+ I t 11 F Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 348 21 32 204 19 32 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 378 23 35 222 21 35 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (f 1s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 401 681 390 vC1, stage 1 confvol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 97 95 95 cM capacity (veh/h) 1158 404 659 Volume Total 401 35 222 21 35 Volume Left 0 35 0 21 0 Volume Right 23 0 0 0 35 cSH 1700 1158 1700 404 659 Volume to Capacity 0.24 0.03 0.13 0.05 0.05 Queue Length (ft) 0 2 0 4 4 Control Delay (s) 0.0 8.2 0.0 14.4 10.8 Lane LOS A B B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 1.1 12.1 Approach LOS B 1nter~e~E~n,~x~ma~`_,P,,,~ Average Delay 1.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 31.3% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church July 2006 Rev LANTZ ASSOCIATES HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: 32nd Ave & N Quail Sun AM - 20 yr 4--- t --Ip. Mpuernentw,„ _ 9EBL EBT, W$T „1h18R, „ySB1. , SOR Lane Configurations + T+ Y Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 1 379 234 1 6 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 1 412 254 1 7 2 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 255 669 255 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 98 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 1310 422 784 lire,Cton,3t ane,, , ; 'E6,1=..~B ? . Volume Total 1 412 255 9 Volume Left 1 0 0 7 Volume Right 0 0 1 2 cSH 1310 1700 1700 477 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.24 0.15 0.02 Queue Length (ft) 0 0 0 1 Control Delay (s) 7.8 0.0 0.0 12.7 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 12.7 Approach LOS B Ill" gft'Sdill-, Average Delay 0.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 31.7% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church July 2006 Rev LANTZ ASSOCIATES HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: 32nd Ave & Robb St Wed PM - 20 yr Lane Configurations T+ t Y Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 457 4 4 291 7 8 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 497 4 4 316 8 9 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 501 824 499 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 98 98 cM capacity (veh/h) 1063 341 572 Volume Total 501 4 316 16 Volume Left 0 4 0 8 Volume Right 4 0 0 9 cSH 1700 1063 1700 435 Volume to Capacity 0.29 0.00 0.19 0.04 Queue Length (ft) 0 0 0 3 Control Delay (s) 0.0 8.4 0.0 13.6 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.1 13.6 Approach LOS B I 3 Average Delay 0.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 36.4% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church July 2006 Rev LANTZ ASSOCIATES HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: 32nd Ave & West Driveway Wed PM - 20 yr Movement , , j„ EBL _E$T WBT„ WBR _ „SBL~ $BR_ _ Lane Configurations T Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 45 420 277 32 6 18 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 49 457 301 35 7 20 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (f /s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 336 873 318 vC1, stage 1 confvol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 96 98 97 cM capacity (veh/h) 1223 308 722 0,01, KIM E0,13 1; Volume Total 49 457 336 26 Volume Left 49 0 0 7 Volume Right 0 0 35 20 cSH 1223 1700 1700 540 Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.27 0.20 0.05 Queue Length (ft) 3 0 0 4 Control Delay (s) 8.1 0.0 0.0 12.0 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay (s) 0.8 0.0 12.0 Approach LOS B Average Delay 0.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 34.0% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church July 2006 Rev LANTZ ASSOCIATES HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: 32nd Ave & South Side Driveway Wed PM - 20 yr Lane Configurations T* + V Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 386 40 46 281 28 16 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 420 43 50 305 30 17 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (f /s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 463 847 441 vC1, stage 1 confvol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 95 90 97 cM capacity (veh/h) 1098 317 616 Direct(in s `ahfll E '1• a ~ B 1, ~V . .MtB 2 + rN6 ~t~1 ,'i , 'i ! , . aa . . w , . , . . Volume Total 463 50 305 30 17 Volume Left 0 50 0 30 0 Volume Right 43 0 0 0 17 cSH 1700 1098 1700 317 616 Volume to Capacity 0.27 0.05 0.18 0.10 0.03 Queue Length (ft) 0 4 0 8 2 Control Delay (s) 0.0 8.4 0.0 17.6 11.0 Lane LOS A C B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 1.2 15.2 Approach LOS C Average Delay 1.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 34.7% ICU Lev el of Service A Applewood Baptist Church July 2006 Rev LANTZ ASSOCIATES HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: 32nd Ave & East Driveway - NS Wed PM - 20 yr M,avement _ . fBL, EBT,WB,T, ,1718R, >S$t.;' SBR Lane Configurations } Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 12 390 319 34 2 8 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 13 424 347 37 2 9 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 384 815 365 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 99 99 99 cM capacity (veh/h) 1175 343 680 Volume Total 13 424 384 11 Volume Left 13 0 0 2 Volume Right 0 0 37 9 cSH 1175 1700 1700 568 Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.25 0.23 0.02 Queue Length (ft) 1 0 0 1 Control Delay (s) 8.1 0.0 0.0 11.5 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay (s) 0.2 0.0 11.5 Approach LOS B ~InferB@4ftor?~Suhi'lnar~ Average Delay 0.3 Intersection Capacity Util ization 32.3% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church July 2006 Rev LANTZ ASSOCIATES HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 13: 32nd Ave & Quail St Wed PM - 20 yr lNBL 4V8Tx SrE6T Mouemexat ' EBf;s _ , _ _ , , Lane Configurations Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 368 24 26 340 13 36 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 400 26 28 370 14 39 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (f /s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 426 839 413 vC1, stage 1 confvol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 98 96 94 cM capacity (veh/h) 1133 327 639 ~1TMBtJ WB 1 t~1NB'2 sNRi2 LaRet# 1; ; t ! ~sTeeXo O .s US a , ~ ,s~. , . s , ~ , Volume Total 426 28 370 14 39 Volume Left 0 28 0 14 0 Volume Right 26 0 0 0 39 cSH 1700 1133 1700 327 639 Volume to Capacity 0.25 0.02 0.22 0.04 0.06 Queue Length (ft) 0 2 0 3 5 Control Delay (s) 0.0 8.3 0.0 16.5 11.0 Lane LOS A C B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.6 12.5 Approach LOS B a~ Average Delay 1.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 32.6% I CU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church July 2006 Rev LANTZ ASSOCIATES HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: 32nd Ave & N Quail Wed PM - 20 yr Lane Configurations I ? T+ rf Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 4 400 364 2 2 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 4 435 396 2 2 2 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (f ts) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 398 840 397 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 99 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 1161 334 653 Dire'cklons.Lataa?#? :E13:.1 .,EB.2°iWS.1...s1.1,. Volume Total 4 435 398 4 Volume Left 4 0 0 2 Volume Right 0 0 2 2 cSH 1161 1700 1700 442 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.26 0.23 0.01 Queue Length (ft) 0 0 0 1 Control Delay (s) 8.1 0.0 0.0 13.2 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay (s) 0.1 0.0 13.2 Approach LOS B 10 iiis~010- 1 5 Average Delay 0.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 32.9% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church' July 2006 Rev LANTZ ASSOCIATES Applewood Baptist Church Education Building Addition Traffic Impact Study Prepared for: Applewood Baptist Church 11200 W 32"d Ave Wheat Ridge CO 80033 303-232-9575 303-238-2513 fax o 1 I! Prepared by: Fred Lantz LANTZ ASSOCIATES 13335 W 72"d Cir Arvada, CO 80005 303-887-3714 i 23410 303-423-4949 fax Z/k/06 February 2004 Revised February 2006 Applewood Baptist Church Revised Traffic Impact Study Table of Contents Table of Contents 2 Introduction 3 Figure 1 -Vicinity Map 4 Existing Conditions 5 Figure 2 - Existing Traffic Volumes - Sunday 9 Figure 3 - Existing Traffic Volumes - Wednesday Evening 10 Education Building Addition 11 Figure 4 -Site Plan 14 Figure 5 - Sunday Traffic Volumes with Addition 15 Figure 6 - Wednesday Traffic Volumes with Addition 16 Figure 7 - Sunday Traffic Volumes in 20 Years 17 Figure 8 - Wednesday Traffic Volumes in 20 Years 18 LOS Calculations 19 LOS Definitions 21 Pedestrians 23 Summary and Conclusion 24 Appendix 26 February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES 2 Applewood Baptist Church Revised Traffic Impact Study Introduction Applewood Baptist Church is located on W 32"d Ave between Quail St and Robb St. The sanctuary is located on the south side of W 32"d Ave with an education building located on the north side of W 32"d Ave. Parking is provided on both the north side and the south side of W 32"d Ave. A crosswalk in W 32"d Ave is used by pedestrians to cross between the buildings. Church services are held on Sunday mornings. There are three services, 8:00 am, 9:30 am and 11:00 am. Sunday school is at 9:30 am and 11:00 am. The church is planning to expand the education facilities by constructing an addition to the Education Building on the north side of W 32nd Ave. This Traffic Impact Study will look at the existing conditions on Sunday morning and Wednesday evening to determine the traffic impacts of the construction of the education building. While the Church is used other times during the week, the traffic on Sunday mornings and Wednesday evenings is the heaviest. Figure 1 is a vicinity map showing the location of the Church. The February 2006 revision includes changes made to the Site Plan and access location changes. February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Vicinity Map © 2002 by Rand McNally & Company. All rights reserved. Applewood Baptist Church Revised Traffic Impact Study Existing Conditions W32 d Ave at the church is a two lane roadway with a two-way left turn lane in the center and bike lanes on each side. There are sidewalks on both sides of the roadway. The church presently has four access points onto W 32"d Ave. Three driveways are on the north side and one on the south side. There are two separate lots on the north side with one access serving the western lot and two accesses serving the eastern lot. The education building is on the eastern lot. February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES W32 nd Ave Street Section Applewood Baptist Church Revised Traffic Impact Study February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Central and Western Access Points on North Side Eastern Access on North Side Applewood Baptist Church Revised Traffic Impact Study Traffic Counts were taken on Sunday morning to determine the amount of traffic using the driveways. Counts were taken at the end of the 9:30 am service when vehicles were leaving the Church at the same time that vehicles were arriving for the 11:00 am service. Counts were also taken at the end of the 11:00 am service. The church traffic lasted 30 minutes, thus the initial counts were 30 minute counts. The traffic counts indicated that the heaviest period was the time between 9:30 am and the 11:00 am services. Additional traffic counts were then taken over an hour period in order to calculate a Level of Service at each of the four access points and the adjacent intersections. Figure 2 summarizes the traffic counts at the driveways and intersections during the Sunday February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Access on South Side & Crosswalk on W 32nd Ave Applewood Baptist Church Revised Traffic Impact Study services. These traffic counts have been increased by growth factors to represent the increase in traffic since the counts were originally taken. Traffic counts were also taken on Wednesday evening because of the activities that occur that evening. The traffic counts were taken between 5:30 pm and 6:30 pm, as requested by the Cities of Wheat Ridge and Lakewood to determine the amount of traffic occurring during the afternoon rush hour. A Level of Service analysis was also prepared for that time period. Figure 3 summarizes the traffic counts at the driveways and intersections during the Wednesday evening period. February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Figure 2 Applewood Baptist Church Existing Traffic - Between Middle Services cn U) z z z N T t0 ' N ~ a ~ w z Z 51 X 01 8 X 0 8 X216 32 d A X2 ~z39 229 X h 197 n ve 9 22~-1 223 226 2ae 244 -1 224 ~ 220 4 Y ~rn ~ N N 3 cn o ? o ce O d U) L 3 O February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Page 9 Figure 3 Applewood Baptist Church Existing Traffic - Wednesday Evening U) z cl) z z T ' N 3 ~ 3 ~ d z 36 0~ ~za o 3249 ~~a9 X261 32nd Ave M m Y29402t 4 a 32 330 323- 222 soa O d a in t 0 February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Page 10 Applewood Baptist Church Revised Traffic Impact Study Education Building Addition The Church is planning to construct an addition to the Education Building on the north side of W 32nd Ave. This addition will serve as additional space for the Church's educational activities. The Education Building will be on Lot 1, the southern portion of the church property on the north side of 32"d Ave. Lot 2, the northern portion of the church property on the north side of 32nd Ave will be developed with a maximum of 30 single family homes. While the development of Lot 2 is not part of this study,iR;s ~ 4! S - 7 i o p o e ` m d e v e T o p m e r i t vill=be tricluded'm this stud. ""i 1. M- This Education Building addition will improve the access and circulation to the property on the north side of W 32"d Ave. and will allow the elimination of two of the existing access points on 32"d Ave. The easternmost access point will remain, the center and western access points will be eliminated and new access point constructed on the west side onto an extended Robb St. The church will access the newly constructed extension of Robb St north of 32nd Ave. The new extension of Robb St will also serve access to the single family homes on Lot 2. Figure 4 is the Site Plan that shows the proposed access points. Robb St north of 32nd Ave will be offset approximately 15' to the east from the existing roadway south of 32nd Ave. This offset is due to the limitations of the property line. The design of Robb St north of 32nd will allow it to be relocated directly across from the existing street south of 32nd Ave when the property becomes available in the future. The 15' offset is insignificant in the near term and the intersection will not cause any operational problems until it can be eliminated in the future. February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Applewood Baptist Church Revised Traffic Impact Study Since the Education Building addition is to increase the education space, it will serve the existing congregation and will not in itself generate additional traffic Tlie'iirprovement to facilities, however, could help to i -f6'ase the congregation. To evaluate the impact of additional traffic that could be generated by the new addition, the existing traffic will be increased by 10% per;year. This growth rate represents the average growth of the church over the past 4 pears. The average Church attendance has increased from 510 in 2000 to 910 in 2004, an average of 11 % per year. Church School attendance has increased 10% per year over the same period. The 10% per year increase in traffic was derived from this data. Lot 2 is proposed to contain a maximum of 30 single family homes. The number of trips generated by these homes is estimated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation 7`" Edition manual. The estimated trips are shown in the following table. Lot 2 - 30 Single Family Homes Estimated Trips ITE Daily AM PM Land Use Rate Trips Rate Trips In Trips Out Rate Trips In Trips Out 210 9.57 287 0.75 6 17 1.01 19 11 The trips from Lot 2 will be added to the Church traffic for the LOS analysis. Traffic on the street system was increased by '/z% per year to represent the growth in traffic since the traffic counts were taken. This growth rate is typical in built out areas of Jefferson County for streets like 32"d Ave. February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES 12 Applewood Baptist Church Revised Traffic Impact Study The new traffic generated by the Church growth and the development of Lot 2 will be distributed to the new access configuration to determine if the Level of Service (LOS) at each access and the adjacent intersections decreases with the additional traffic. This analysis will be done for the initial build out of the Education building and for a 20 year time frame for both Sunday mornings and Wednesday evenings. e 5 ah 6show the?`protee edtra£fic fgr the Education building=. addition and=for the single faintly homes on Lot 2 added to the°existingti trr f Figure 5 is for Sunday mornings and Figure 6 is for Wednesday evenings. It is estimated that the Education building will be completed within 2years and the Single Family homes will also be constructed in that time period.lae chuxch traffic leas increased byT 10%-per year to represent thgxowfiha-inteaffic °for tle'perid`d betweenthis study and the opening of r the Education Building. The street traffic was also increased by 1/2% per ryearto account for traffic growth`until the construction` is completed. The traffic volumes for the Church and on the street were increased at the same rate for 20 years to represent possible future conditions. It is unlikely that the Church traffic will continue to increase 10% per year for 20 years, so this analysis will represent a "worst case" scenario. February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES 13 C ~U ~~IV O w a 3nN3AV PUZ£ 1S3M n F 1 1 N O ♦ LL ' s a I w ]-b~KIO M9 ~ - II I I - e 5 1! III C I I ' g iT f~Y O.. t i i I I Q H 5 I' II 1 zz a i1 H u0 ' all ~ I ~ y y , 1 I/ 1 8 1 ~ 5445- I O e ' ` 1 1 I 1 % I / I 11`1 1 ;`5 VIII i 1I I I{ w s =;1 a x® 11 ;I '0 ~ Q I - _ y qq tf I 1 6 It ~ C♦ \ 111°111 1 II I /I Ill 3 Y' I h'11I 9 1 I; ; 1 ,,1111111111,1T1III,III,a11A1 h1IIIT~.IIII~ 111j1 n i A A 1 I A; ; ~ 1 III ~ ~ I I I 11 Illj I, S 1 I I II!III I n n \ SA X 1 1 1 +111'1 hk4' ' 36 3j II I I !;;i F11 k'(I lL'f'1 11'1°T~ 1,1111 Je lilj f♦I♦I I ° 111 111111 I. 9 1 I`ill' I ~~Illlj - V , I I 1 IIIII, 'I ~S s. I 1 ~IIIIIII / ~ 9,} AJ 111111 T ♦1 11 1 111111 / ' v' "rill ♦ ♦ ` , 1 , (111111 , IIIII, _ -I _y ♦ ♦ ,'=5637-- \ I ~j I F 1 _ 1 tT - O X43__. _ _-6436 - p \\ZI I a 10 1 - 4 1 a ~ ;1 z 0 0 0 ~m , o J Q~ 1 I G O d' I 1 O4 m ,1 3~ Figure 5 Applewood Baptist Church Sun AM with Ed Building a a K U) Z T 3 0 0 b X51 West Driveway > o N N W Z e227 F204 8 X 1 190 X e3 32nd Ave ~a 199 218 ~~Jcq) 8~ 22 - 226 261- 259-q 2sp, `No j 23 19 2 MM rn N T N 3 > > O ~ d co L 3 o February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Page 15 Figure 6 Applewood Baptist Church Wed PM with Ed Building 65 a o tU Z T m 3 0 o 6 ~ West Driveway i o N Q ~N t6 W Z x-226 ~ - 96 N O 2 Z- C\1 C-4 F-247~ 1 X 32nd Ave L, 2, 257 269 k~-_ 18 1 36 341 -t aas 321 as 4 , 0 ~ g 36 0 22 y N M ~ M T ~ 3 3 a U) L 3 O cf) February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Page 16 Figure 7 Applewood Baptist Church Sun AM - 20 yr rn z T l0 0 `j-133 West Driveway 3 > ~ o ~ ^ Ul CJ W Z ~w v 256 mm 22 41 l X N 1 (-208 32nd Ave 205 „ 234 44 277 V 3116 3481 344 244 0 23 ° 21 N N M 3 co 9 O N cn L 0 O February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Page 17 Figure 8 Applewood Baptist Church wen rin - zu yr a a o cq Z a m 3 0 0 X24 West Driveway j o j r m (7 mV W Z 47 71 f322 N 2 X N N 34 2 32nd Ave ~4s 360 373 55~ 412 IT 430 434 412-1 444- $ m 40 m~ 24 y Nr M0 M T lV (n 3 - o ~ U) L 3 O U) February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Page 18 Applewood Baptist Church Revised Traffic Impact Study LOS Calculations Level of Service (LOS) conditions were calculated for each access and the adjoining intersections to determine if the increase in traffic due to the Education Bldg addition and the Single Family homes on Lot 2 would cause traffic congestion in the area. The following table shows the existing LOS and the LOS with the construction of the education building addition and the single family homes and the LOS in the future (20 years). February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES 19 Applewood Baptist Church Revised Traffic Impact Study Access/Intersection LOS Access/Intersection Movement Existing LOS LOS with Addition LOS in Future (20yrs) Sun Wed Sun Wed Sun Wed West Access at Robb - - A A A A WB Left - - A A A A 32 Ave & Robb St A A A A A A EB Left A A A A WB Left A A A A A A NB B B B B C C SB B B B B North Side - Western A A - - - EB Left A A - - - SB B A - - - North Side - Middle A A - - - EB Left A A - - - SB B B - - - South Side A A A A A A West Left A A A A A A NB Left B B B B B C NB Right A B A B B B North Side - East A A A A A A EB Left A A A A A A SB B A B A B B 32" Ave & Quail (south) A A A A A A WB Left A A A A A A NB Left B B B B B C NB Right A B B B B B 32" Ave & Quail (north) A A A A A A EB Left A A A A A A SB B B B B B B February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES 20 Applewood Baptist Church Revised Traffic Impact Study LOS Definitions The Level of Service (LOS) of an intersection is determined by the delay vehicles experience at the intersection. At a stop sign controlled intersection, the LOS is only calculated for the directions that must stop or yield to other traffic. A LOS is not calculated for the through traffic because it does not have to stop or yield and thus will not be delayed. Intersections are designed to operate at LOS C or better and are allowed to operate at D or better during the AM and PM peak hour periods. The following table shows the seconds of delay that determine the LOS at stop sign controller intersections. LOS Criteria for Stop sign controlled intersections LOS Average Total Delay (sec/veh) A <5 B >5 and <10 C >10 and <20 D >20 and <30 E >30 and <45 F >45 As the LOS calculations indicate, there is little or no delay to vehicles entering and exiting the Church at the present time during the Sunday services and the Wednesday evening programs. There are also no delays to vehicles at the adjacent intersections during the same time periods. This was also confirmed by observations during these hours. t February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES 21 Applewood Baptist Church Revised Traffic Impact Study The LOS does not change with the increase in traffic due to the Education Building addition and the construction of the single family homes on Lot 2 during Sunday services and on Wednesday evenings. he 20_y_ear" ° rojeohons`also show that there will be no`significant change in the LOS at t11e access points or-the °adjacent intersections in the future for both Sunday P °Inings and Wednesday evenings. T iezefore;the; raffi'c"generated by the Education Building addition and the-- si ] fau~dy-'homes-0n=l of 2 wilt not cause-an ach e"rsetmpaclto-the street; lt3e°tivor~c February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES 22 Applewood Baptist Church Revised Traffic Impact Study Pedestrians With the education building and some of the parking on the north side of the roadway, there is considerable pedestrian traffic crossing W 32nd Ave. Observations before and after the 11:00 am service indicated approximately 125 pedestrians crossing W 32nd Ave during each time period. There were fewer pedestrians observed during the Wednesday evening activities. A crossing guard is provided before and after the Sunday services and on Wednesday evenings to assist the pedestrians. The guard places traffic cones in the bike lane and also in the left turn lane to add emphasis to the crosswalk. In addition, the guard has a Stop Paddle to stop traffic. This method is very efficient for both the pedestrian and the vehicles on W 32"d Ave. The crossing guard crosses pedestrians during breaks in traffic. The maximum number of vehicles stopped on both Sunday and Wednesdays was 5 vehicles. Vehicles did not back up during either period to block the adjacent intersection. As the pedestrian activity increases, the Church will be looking at ways to improve the pedestrian crossing. February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES 23 Applewood Baptist Church Revised Traffic Impact Study Summary and Conclusion The traffic generated by the Education Building Addition and the single family homes proposed by the Applewood Baptist Church can easily be accommodated by the existing street system. The development will eliminate two access points on the north side of W 32°d Ave and will place the western access onto an extended Robb St. The Robb St intersection will initially be offset to the east approximately 15'. This offset will not cause traffic operation problems in the near term due to the low volumes of traffic at the intersection. The offset will be eliminated in the future when the ROW becomes available on the north side. Traffic circulation will also be improved on the Church property north of W 32nd Ave with the construction of the Education Building and the Robb St extension. Pedestrian traffic will continue to cross W 32"d Ave when there are activities at the Church. The present crossing guard program is very efficient in assisting pedestrians and should be continued. The crossing guard is able to look for gaps in traffic and thus does not delay traffic on W 32nd Ave or cause any traffic congestion. As pedestrian activity increases in the future, improvements to the pedestrian crossing, such as a traffic signal should be considered. No congestion was observed in the areas surrounding the church during the Sunday services and during the Wednesday evening services. The Church has asked its members to park in the parking lots and not on the street. The additional parking that is being constructed with the Education building on the north side of W 32°d Ave will be sufficient to accommodate church February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES 24 Applewood Baptist Church Revised Traffic Impact Study traffic. The improved circulation and access will ensure that vehicles can be parked on-site and will not be forced into the surrounding neighborhood. February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES 25 Applewood Baptist Church Revised Traffic Impact Study Appendix LOS Calculations Traffic Counts Response to Review2 Response to Comments February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES 26 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: 32nd Ave & Robb St Existing Traffic - Between Middle Services 4.1 capacity (veh/h) 796 Volume Total 243 3 273 18 Volume Le# 0 3 0 12 Volume Riaht 2 0 0 7 Volume to Control 11.3 Applewood Baptist Church February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Uolurne_(u`ehlh) 222 2 3 251 11 6 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 241 2 3 2M 12 7 Pedestrians HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: 32nd Ave & West Driveway - NS Existing Traffic - Between Middle Services turn flare Median cM capacity (veh/h) 1301 514 777 239 263 20 Intersection Capacity Utilization 23.9% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES llfllumes(vehlh) 8,1 220"239 '3 3 15 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: 32nd Ave & Middle Driveway - NS Existing Traffic - Between Middle Services --I. F t \0. 4/ Right turn flare (veh) Mediantype None Median storage veh) vC.conflicting volume 255 495 252 Applewood Baptist Church February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Uojume (vehlh) 0 223 229 6 14 13 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly"orvrate(ueh/h) 9 242 -249 7 15 14 Pedestrians Volume Total 0 242 255 29 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: 32nd Ave & South Side Driveway Existing Traffic - Between Middle Services -V 410' ~ 4\ P Right turn flare (veh) {Nediantype Median storage veh) vC , conflicting volumj vC1. staae 1 conf vol tF 540 793 Total 258 9 218 37 0 9 0 37 23 0 0 0 700. 1307 1700 540 0.15 0.01 _ 0.13 0.07 0 , 1 0' 5, 0.0 7.8 0.0 12.2 A B 0.0 0.3 10.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 23.7% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Volume-_(vehlh) 216 21: ~ i 8 201 34 35 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: 32nd Ave & East Driveway - NS Existing Traffic - Between Middle Services t ti ►r Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.16 0. Control Delay (s) 7.7 0.0 Applewood Baptist Church February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Volume'(veh/h)` 1 248 197 8 15 12 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hour)y `flow rate (veh/h) 1 270 214 9 , 16 = 13 Pedestrians Volume Total 1 270 223 29 Volume L'ef( 1 ` 0 0 16 Volume Right 0 0 9 13 Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 10.9 Approach LOS: B HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 13: 32nd Ave & Quail St Existing Traffic - Between Middle Services 7 j I*\ P ht turn Median Total 286 32 204 Intersection Capacity Utilization 25.2% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES volume (veh/h) 244, 19 29 188 11, 29 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 o.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (ve_ h/h) 265 21 32 204" 18 ; 32 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Lane LOS A B A Approach Delay (s) 0.0 1.1 10.9 Approach LOS B HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: 32nd Ave & N Quail Existing Traffic - Between Middle Services Intersection Capacity Utilization 25.6% ICU Level of Service A f: 7 Applewood Baptist Church February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES yolumvehlh) 1 272 216 0 5 _ 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourlyfi~ouq rate (vgh/h) 296 235 0 . , 5 t 1 Pedestrians Volume Total 1 296 235 7 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8: West Driveway & Robb St Sun AM with Ed Building ( t t 1' flare 1 conf vol 4.1 Average Delay 6.1 Intersection Capacity Utiliiafon 13 3% ICU Level of Service A " Applewood Baptist Church February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Uolme:,(veh/h) , S "0 10 0 ' 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Yolume_ Right 0 22;" 0 cSH 1006 1700 1592 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: 32nd Ave & Robb St Sun AM with Ed Building -,;V r4--- 4_ 4N t t y l d tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 2.2 cM capacity (veh/h) 1306 1320 Volume Total 9 246 3 259 22 Volume Left 9 0 3 0 13 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 97 100 99 95 99 96 422 452 794 453 455 786 Applewood Baptist Church February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Volume (veh/h) 8 224 2 3 227 11 12 2 6 19 3 30 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: 32nd Ave & South Side Driveway Sun AM with Ed Building ` F 4N /r Intersection Capacity Utilization 24.4% ICU Level of Service A r~ Applewood Baptist Church February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Volumg (veh%h) 226 23 S 204 37 t 36 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourlyiow rate ( eh/h)- - , 246 25 222 : - 40 39 Pedestrians Volume Total 271 9 222 40 39 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: 32nd Ave & East Driveway - NS Sun AM with Ed Building Applewood Baptist Church February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Uotume (uehlh) 1 261 .199 8 - 17 131, Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Houl ly'flow rate (ueh/h} 1 284 ` 216 9 18 ? 141 Pedestrians Volume Total 1 284 225 33 QueueLength {ft). 0 0 0 : ` ' 4 Control Delay (s) 7.7 0.0 0.0 11.1 Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 11.1 Approach LOS _ B HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 13: 32nd Ave & Quail St Sun AM with Ed Building vC~ cSr~fUctmg volume 302; w 561 ,292 , vC1, stage 1 conf vol uC2 ~t,~ge2~conf~ol tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 iC 2s~a9e(s) ~ tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 qugpe free% 97 96 ~96 cM capacity (veh/h) 1259 476 747 Volume Total 302 32 207 18 32 Applewood Baptist Church February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES 711 9 ° 190 17 29 : 2 VAlur a ((vehlh) 25 92 Peak Hour Factor 0. 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: 32nd Ave & N Quail Sun AM with Ed Building Intersection Capacity Utilization 26.4% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES VoluJn{ueh%h) _ -;1, . 2$7 218 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourlyflow'rate (veh/h) - . 1 342 . 237 1 ; 5 S 1 Pedestrians Volume Total 1 312 238 7 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8: West Driveway & Robb St Sun AM - 20 yr 4- t r` l turn flare Median Approach LOS A Average Delay 6.2 I~fersect on Capacity lJtilizat on - 19.2% ICU Level of Service A. Applewood Baptist Church February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES volume (vehlh) '133 ` `0 - 1 67 0 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 cSH 973 1700 1526 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: 32nd Ave & Robb St Sun AM - 20 yr or, 4- 4N T l 41 turn 1 4.1 7.1 6.5 2.2 3.5 1259 1298 Volume Total 48 266 4 302 35 146 Volume Leff 48 . 0 . 4 0 22 53, Volume Right 0 4 0 24 11 91 Volume to Capacity 0.04 Applewood Baptist Church February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Volume (veh/h) 44 241 4 4 255 22 20 2 10 49 1 84 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 481'1262 4 `4 - 278 24 22 2r 11 53 1 91 Pedestrians HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: 32nd Ave & South Side Driveway Sun AM - 20 yr Nt Lane Configurations if Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 000 0% 0% Volume (yehlh) j, 211, 23 8 241 41 40 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 6.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly, flow rate (vehlh) 301 25 j 9 262" 45 43 Pedestrians Applewood Baptist Church February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Volume Total 326 9 262 45 43 Volume-Left', 0 9 0 45 0 Volume Riaht 25 0 0 0 43 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: 32nd Ave & East Driveway - NS SunAM-20yr F t ti r Volume Total 1 343 247 88 Applewood Baptist Church February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Uglume (uehlh) , 1 316. 2Q5 22,3 `28 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow`rate" (veh/h) .1 343 223 ; - , 24 58 30 Pedestrians Control Delay (s) 7.7 0.0 0.0 12.7 Larie.LS N B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 12.7 APproaiqh~LOS ~B " HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 13: 32nd Ave & Quail St Sun AM - 20 yr Volume Total 401 35 226 21 35 Intersection Capacity Utilization 31.3% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Uolurfie (uehlh), ? . 948 21t `32 208 19 32 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (ueh/h) 37&'? 23 35 °226 -21 35 Pedestrians LeneLOS ,A B_ Approach Delay (s) 0.0 1.1 12.1 ApproachlLOS r,' B, HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: 32nd Ave & N Quail Sun AM - 20 yr Pedestrians Intersection Capacity Utilization 31.7% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES volume (yeh/h) :1- -3 234 "r 1 6 r 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Volume Total 1 412 255 9 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: 32nd Ave & Robb St Existing Traffic - Wednesday Evening Volume (veh/h) -374, 4 I. 4 236 6 ~ 7 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly'flow rate (veh/h) 35*2 4 + 4 257 7 8 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (fUs) Percent Blockage; Right turn flare (veh) Median !type: None Median storage veh) yC, conflicting volume 357 620 354 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tq' 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 cM capacity (veh/h) 1202 Applewood Baptist Church February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES '*i ` ~ 4 4 wu Volume Total 357 4 257 14 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: 32nd Ave & West Driveway - NS Existing Traffic - Wednesday Evening Pedestrians Intersection Capacity Utilization 22.2% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES V61ume,(veh/h)% 330: 240 3 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Right turn flare (veh) Median, type None Median storace veh) Volume Total 1 359 264 0 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: 32nd Ave & Middle Driveway - NS Existing Traffic - Wednesday Evening Intersection Capacity Utilization 28.5% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES / --j, ` 1. Volume Total 8 351 265 7 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: 32nd Ave & South Side Driveway Existing Traffic - Wednesday Evening f~' F 4N turn flare /10 Median Intersection Capacity Utilization 28.8% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Vol Wei (veh/h) 294:1- 30, 19 232 12 7 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourtyfib* rate,(vgh/h) 320_ 33 21 252 13 8 Pedestrians Volume Total 352 21 252 13 8 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: 32nd Ave & East Driveway - NS Existing Traffic - Wednesday Evening t \1' r Right turn flare (veh) Median, type None Median storage veh) vG, cortlicting volume 273 ' 604 272 vC1. staae 1 conf vol tC, single (s) 4. tF (s) 2.2 cM capacity (veh/h Applewood Baptist Church February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES l Volume (veh/h) ,S 5 296 1249 2 )i 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 5 322 ` 271:2 0 2 Pedestrians Volume Total 5 322 273 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 13: 32nd Ave & Quail St Existing Traffic - Wednesday Evening 0.0 0.7 11.0 Applewood Baptist Church February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Volume (veh/h) 'y 274 22 24 239 12 - 33 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (ueh/h) 298 24 26 260 13 ' 36 Pedestrians Volume Total 322 26 260 13 36 QuieueLength(ft) i0 2 0 >2 4 Control Delay (s) 0.0 8.0 0.0 13.4 10.2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: 32nd Ave & N Quail Existing Traffic - Wednesday Evening F t ti r Applewood Baptist Church February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Volume (veh/h) 4 303 261 1 2 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 4 ~ 329 284 1 2 2 Pedestrians Volume Total 4 329 285 4 Queuef16ngth (ft)!.' 0 0 0 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8: West Driveway & Robb St Wed PM with Ed Building f- t t P Applewood Baptist Church February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Udlume (veh/h) 6 .0 19 20'0 ! 11 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Houriy=,ftow rate (ueh/h) 7 0 21 22 0 12 _ Pedestrians Volume Right 0 22 0 - cSH 967 1700 1567 Volume to Capadity 0.01 .0.02 ' 0.00 ' Queue Length (ft) 1 0 0 Lane LOS A Approch Delay (s) &7 0,0 0.0 Approach LOS A HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: 32nd Ave & Robb St Wed PM with Ed Building T /0 l 22 0.02 0.24 0.00 0. Applewood Baptist Church February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Volume (veh/h) 18 364 ' 4 4 226 20 6 1 7 6 1 10 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 o.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 20 396 4 4 246 22 7 .1 8 7 1 , . 11 11 Pedestrians Volume Total 20 400 4 267 15 18 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: 32nd Ave & South Side Driveway Wed PM with Ed Building 39 0 0 0 9 0.24 0.02 0.15 0.04 Control Delay (s) 0.0 8.2 0.0 14.4 10.5 0.0 0.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 31.9% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Volumg (vehlh), ; 34-1. 36 ~ 23 236 14 i 8 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 37'1 39 25 257 15 9 11 - 1: Pedestrians Volume Total 410 25 257 15 9 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: 32nd Ave & East Driveway - NS Wed PM with Ed Building t F ~ ti r 0.01 0.22 0.17 Control Delay (s) 7.8 0.0 Applewood Baptist Church February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Volume (veh/h) 6 3413, 257 ' 2 0 > 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 7 373 i 279 , 2 0 2 Pedestrians Volume Total 7 373 282 2 Approach Delay (s) 0.1 0.0 9.8 Approach LOS HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 13: 32nd Ave & Quail St Wed PM with Ed Building tF cM caoacity (veh/h) 1186 407 684 Intersection Capacity Utilization 29.8% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Volume (veh/h) ( 321 22 24 247 12 ` 33 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 349 24 26, 268 13 36 Pedestrians yo2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 Volume Total 373 26 268 13 36 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: 32nd Ave & N Quail Wed PM with Ed Building Vol 4.1 2.2 p0 queue free % ^ 100 99 ! 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 1268 414 746 Volume Total 4 380 293 4 Applewood Baptist Church February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Volume (veh/h) 4-350 269 1 2 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 4 380 292 1 2 2 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8: West Driveway & Robb St Wed PM - 20 yr t t P Applewdod Baptist Church February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Volume (ueh/h) 24, 0 19 114 0 11 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vehlh) 26 0 21 124 0 12 Pedestrians Volume Right 0 - ,124 0 cSH 905 1700 1438 Volume to Capacity 0.03 , 0.00 0.00 Queue Length (ft) 2 0 0 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: 32nd Ave & Robb St Wed PM - 20 yr 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 33.8% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Volume (veh/h) 55 412 4 4 271 75 7 3' 8 10 3 22 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hdurly flow rate (veh/h) ,60 448 4 4 295, 82 8 39 11, 3 24 Pedestrians cM capacity (veh/h) 1182 1108 239 245 609 235 258 707 Volume Total 60 452 4 376 20 38 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: 32nd Ave & South Side Driveway Wed PM - 20 yr Intersection Capacity Utilization 37.2% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Volume (veh/h) 430 40 46 322, 28 16 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Vnlume Total 511 50 350 30 17 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: 32nd Ave & East Driveway - NS Wed PM - 20 yr -..0 F 4, ti r 0 Applewood Baptist Church February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Volume (veh/h) 12 434 360, 2 2 ' 8 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 13 472 391 2 2 9 Pedestrians a - Volume Total 13 472 393 11 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 13: 32nd Ave & Quail St Wed PM - 20 yr 7 j F 4\ P turn flare Median storage veh) VC--j" cpnflicting volume 474 897 461 vC1. staae 1 conf Vol tC, single (s) 4. cM capacity (veh/h) Applewood Baptist Church February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Volume (veh/h) 412, 24 26 349 13 36 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow, rate (veh/h) 448 26 ` 28 379 14 39 Pedestrians Volume Total 474 28 379 14 39 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: 32nd Ave & N Quail Wed PM - 20 yr --j, F t ti r Volume to Caoacity 0.00 0.28 Control Delav (s) 8. Applewood Baptist Church February 2006 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Volume (veh/h) 4 444 373 2 2 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 4 , 483 405 2 2 i 2 Pedestrians Volume Total 4 483 408 4 Volume Left 4 0 0 2" Volume Right 0 0 2 2 Approach Delay (s) 0.1 0.0 13.7 Approach LOS B Traffic Counts - Between Middle Services Applewood Baptist Church Hourly Count - August 2004 T 3 ~ > ? a3 z W Z NM _ ~N 50 ~M ~zss X230 `204 -,1, X193 ~zs X211 32nd Ave -t 25z-1i 217-1 zi 0s~i 2 19 -t 0 2414 2 19 ~m 216 ~rn ~ N U) 3 U) O rl ~ C7 N 'O U) L J O LANTZ ASSOCIATES August 2004 Traffic Counts - Wednesday Evening Applewood Baptist Church 5:30 - 6:30 pm m T 3 `0 3 o N p 3 1 w 24 447 0 q : 4 X250 2 X263 N~ X251 -j" 0 1 2 32nd Ave -2 51 3 313-1 x 313 225 t5 ~o 244 268 011 ~41. 319 22 N m 3 in - o K o C7 co L 3 O LANTZ ASSOCIATES January 2005 All Traffic Data Services, Inc. 6214 Secrest Street Arvada, CO 80403 File Name Site Code Start Date Page No Groups Printed Unsh itted WEST&32NDAM 00000000 02/23/2003 1 WEST DRIVE NORTH SIDE 32ND WEST DRIVE NORTH SIDE 32ND Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Righ Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left 7hru Righ Pads Int. t Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0930 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 12 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 12 100 100 Apprch % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 41.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 58.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 MST DRIVE NORTH SIDE Out In ToUal I~ 0 0 Right Thru Loft pods 41 aJ 1 `A ~O o ° No& J N 2 z 0?1§Zff0930 r 011Y520N 09,30 o ° C ~ Unshifted ~ °a o ~ Left O +1 T 7hru Right Peds 0 0 I~ ON N Trial WEST DRIVE NORTH SIDE All Traffic Data Services, Inc. 6214 Secrest Street Arvada, CO 80403 File Name : WEST&32NDNOON Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 02/23/2003 Page No :1 WEST DRIVE NORTH SIDE 32ND WEST DRIVE NORTH SIDE 32ND I Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Rig Peds Left Thru Right Reds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Rig Peds Int. tal To Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1030 AM 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 10 1045 AM 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 12 Total 6 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 22 Grand Total 6 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 22 Apprch % 100 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total % 27.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 40.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 trv iunrve rvun I N JIVe ON In Total I~ 0 61 L-bl 01 Right Thru Leff Peds *1 1L+ ma~ T North 072320[.L3 10w 07fY320 id uneniRed +Tr Left lluu Right Peds 0 0 0 Out In TUaI WEST DRIVE NORTH SIDE Lp ~p z 0 All Traffic Data Services, 6214 Secrest Street Inc. Arvada, CO 80403 File Name Site Code Start Date Page No Groups Printed Unshifted MIDDLE&32NDAM 00000000 02/23/2003 1 MIDDLE DRIVE NORTH SIDE 32ND MIDDLE DRIVE NORTH SIDE 32ND Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Righ Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Righ Pads Int. total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0930 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 100 100 Apprch % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 75.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MIDDLE DRIVENORTH I Out In Trial 0 0 Right Thiu Left Peds ~O North y ^ 2 o S w N - 022920D3 x'30 z t O]1232003~30 ~ m O~ o p~ UnshiXed o a~ N G Lan Thru y +1 T Right rate 01 01 01 q Out In Trial MIDDLE DRIVE NORTH SIDE All Traffic Data Services, Inc. 6214 Secrest Street Arvada, CO 80403 rmuns PrintedUnshifted File Name : MIDDLE&32NDNOON Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 02/2312003 Page No : 1 MIDDLE DRIVE NORTH SIDE 32ND MIDDLE DRIVE NORTH SIDE 32ND I Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Rlgh Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Righ Peds Int. Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1030 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1045 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0' 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 6 Total 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 7 Grand Total 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 7 Apprch % 100. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100, 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100. 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total % 14.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 ~Outu~~vniv InTdal ® 0 0 Right Th. Left Pebs +j 1L+ T North awym 1030 1= 10"* Unshifled +1 Tr Leff Thm Right Pe 0 0 0 [---q I-q w In Tdel Lp Do a 2 y a All Traffic Data Services, Inc. 6214 Secrest Street Arvada, CO 80403 Grouos PrintedUnshifted File Name : 32ND&EASTAM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 02/23/2003 Page No : 1 EAST DRIVEWAYS 32ND EAST DRIVEWAYS 32ND Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Rig i Peds Lek Thru it Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Rlg Peds Int. f tal To Fac[or 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 7.0 7.0 1.0 0930 AM 0 0 0 0 6 21 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 29 7 0 70 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 6 21 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 29 7 0 70 Apprch % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.2 63.6 18.2 0.0 1000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 80.6 19.4 0.0 Total % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.6 30.0 8.6 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 41.4 10.0 0.0 EAST DRIVEWAYS ON In Trial I~ ~ =p I 0 01 u Right Thru Let Peds r~ o mJ ~A ~O rv North ' m m r z rP23rNA[630 ' z r2oro a c930 ° Onshifletl N ° 2 Left Thru o ~ Right Peds ON In Total EAST DRIVEWAYS All Traffic Data Services, Inc. 6214 Secrest Street Arvada, CO 80403 r_...~~~~ o.m~enr mmleen File Name : 32ND&EASTNOON Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 02/23/2003 Page No : 1 EAST DRIVEWAYS 32ND EAST DRIVEWAYS 32ND Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Righ Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Rig Peds Int. t i To tal Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 10:30 AM 1 0 0 0 3 42 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 36 3 0 88 10:45 AM 1 0 0 0 7 57 0 0 2 0 1 0 2 36 11 0 117 Total 2 0 0 0 10 99 0 0 4 0 1 0 3 72 14 0 205 Grand Total 2 0 0 0 10 99 0 0 4 0 1 0 3 72 14 0 205 Apprch % 1000 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.2 90.8 0.0 0.0 80.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 3.4 80.9 15.7 0.0 Total % 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.9 48.3 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 1.5 35.1 6.8 0.0 tA51 UMVtvvAyS Out In Trial 0 E;p F---q r 01 0 2 0 Right Th. laR Peds 4~ 1 North J=Mp 0,30 17223X1031045 unshifted T r Right Peds 4 Out In Trial veer nvmm~mvc LA ~O S m z a a m LANTZ ASSOCIATES 13335 W. 72" d Cir. Atvada,C080005 (303) 887-3714 (303)4234949fax January 11, 2005 Steve Nguyen, PE Engineering Division Manager Department of Public Works City of Wheat Ridge Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 RE: Applewood Baptist Church Expansion Project Comments from 2"d Review of Traffic Impact Study Dear Steve, The following is in response to your comments on the Traffic Impact Study for Applewood Baptist Church. The responses also include the comments from the City of Lakewood. The comments are included for your use. Srrrcetheproposedwestaccess wtllfanctionsimilarto am ofsetinlersectlon wtthRohhStpleare allow adequatedirmncetomirdmizeleftturrrcohjltctr Adiscursionisneededtoaddressthtsconfigurattorria terms afPraffc operation arrdsof 9! The ofsetdislahceshallbe atlearlJ3-0fee1 The curreatsileplarr does motinatcate"ch. The western access is aligned so that vehicles can circulate around the new building and have a direct straight access to 32"d Ave. The traffic volume turning left from westbound 32"d Ave onto Robb St is minimal during the hours that the Church uses their access. Because of the low turning volumes, the conflicts will be minimal and the Church does not believe that there is a problem with turning traffic. Moving the access to the east will cause internal circulation problems for vehicles in the parking lot. Because of these reasons, the Church prefers to leave the western access as it is shown on the site plan. Z TraffccounlsandLOSanalyses willmeedto he tmclmdedfortheintersection ofQaailandRohh at.Tla Ave,wesrncetheyarepartofthecharrchtraffccirculationamdaccers Theseamalysesforthe mtersecttomsanddrtvewaysdoesnotaccaurrtforthe b-a~cde/ayararesultforthe comcurremt pedesbianacttvttyam3-'P'Avenae P/earefeld-ver amddtscussthemagmiludeanditstmpacis Traffic counts and LOS analysis was included for Quail and Robb in the response to the first review of the Traffic Study. The analysis of the intersections did not include the impact of the pedestrian crossing because the pedestrian crossing activity did not cause 32nd Ave traffic to back up to either intersection. The pedestrian activity did not impact either intersection. Page 2 Applewood Baptist Church Response to Review2 January11, 2005 The crossing guard watched traffic on 32"d Ave and only crossed pedestrians when there was a gap in traffic. The crossing guard only stopped traffic that arrived during the time pedestrians were crossing. There were never more than 5 vehicles stopped at the crosswalk in either direction during the hours that I observed the crossing. Most of the time there were one or two vehicles stopped, if any vehicles were stopped at all. 3 Please lrrdreale otherlime ofthe weekwhenlhefacilio harasignfcarrtase Include lrapcfiguresrf lheyconsideredsign(cantforanalysir OurinformationindcatedthalWedoesdaynightact vity s .sigmfcamllhalmniformlraBiccontroltsutili ed Pleaseprovidetraf odataaaddlscussthecapacity an d ap e r at i o n s i n th e r ep o r 1 Traffic counts were taken on a Wednesday evening in November and confirm that the traffic volumes are insignificant. The counts were taken from 5:30 pm to 6:30 pm. During that time eriod, practically all of the vehicles used the main parking lot on the south side of 32" Ave., only 2 or 3 vehicles were observed in the north lot. Pedestrians did cross 32nd Ave and a crossing guard was present. The traffic crossing guard crossed pedestrians during gaps in traffic, and again only stopped vehicles that approached the cross walk while the pedestrians were crossing. The maximum number of vehicles stopped in either direction was 5. The attached traffic count diagram shows the number of vehicles during the hour traffic count. The LOS analysis shows that all intersections/driveways were at LOS B or better in the near term and long term condition. 4 CitygjZakewoodcommemlll2 Thechurch:rpan6nglolaccessonRohhCircleshouldheclosed This lotonlyhasl/Sspares whichcamadequalelyheseruedhytheaccessoNY. ' 4verme Remminglhe accessamRobb Street willhelp to/reep the church traffic on 32~Auenaemrdredacethepotenlialfor vehiclesparkimgimtheneighha hood Thism6wimmeml willhauetmpll atioms ontra_,0'7q erations om 32e,ilvermetraffcpatlemimlheareaamdcurremlemergencyaccesstolhechurchfacOl,y Theclasure willrrolmecessaryguararrteethatprnkzmgprohlem onRohh Circle willhe ehimimated The Church does not want to close the access on 32nd Ave as it provides an important secondary access point for the parking lot on the south side of 32"d Ave. The Church attempts to be a good neighbor by giving cones to the neighbors for them to restrict parking in front of their homes. The Church also makes periodic announcements requesting its members to not park in front of the homes in the neighborhood. Page 3 Applewood Baptist Church Response to Review2 January 11, 2005 S The trafrcgerierationlahlepravrdedinthestudysupplemeatdated8/27/2004doesrrotshowhow the 20yearlr cprojeclioms werederiuedarlohow theyarerelaledto the dram growth lmformation provided The future Church traffic was estimated by using the 10% per year growth that the Church is presently experiencing. Thus the Church traffic was increased 200% to represent the 10% per year for 20 years. This estimate far exceeds the growth in traffic that is expected to occur, thus truly represents a worst case scenario for traffic volumes. Street traffic volumes were increased V2% per year. This growth rate is typical in Jefferson County for streets like 32"d Ave that are in built out areas. Even using such a high growth rate for the Church, the driveways continue to operate at acceptable LOS in the future. 6 Pleared~rcussthecurremtamdfaturelra~iccamtrolforpedesbiamactiviliesom32"iflverrae Itiraar um de rs t am dmg th a t !h e p e de s lri am cr a. rs i mg i s a m aj o r ac t i v i ty o m 3Z a A v e mr e The Church presently utilizes crossing guards to assist pedestrians in crossing 32"d Ave. Prior to 9/11, the Church used paid Police Officers, but this service is no longer available. They also set out cones at the crosswalk to alert approaching drivers that the marked crosswalk is being used. The Church understands the importance of protecting the pedestrians crossing at the crosswalk and is considering options that may be available. They are willing to have their crossing guards trained by Wheat Ridge or Lakewood. They are willing to again use paid Police Officers. They are also considering a pedestrian actuated traffic signal. They are willing to discuss the options with Wheat Ridge and Lakewood and implement the best option available for the future. Responses to the City of Lakewood's comments are as follows (many of the answers are identical to the Wheat Ridge answers): l Allafihemewparlamgsvaces willhesigrr~zWcamtlyfarlherfromlhe chmrchlham om slmelpmklmgimlhe meighhorhood flowdoeslhechurchplamtomiligaleparlamgimlhemeighhorhoodrsoulhofi. " ,9vnwe The Church has given cones to some of the neighbors in the area who are concemed about parking so that they can cone off the area in front of their house. The Church also periodically makes announcements to its members reminding them not to park in the neighborhood. Page 4 Applewood Baptist Church Response to Review2 January 11, 2005 2 The church r az kinglolaccers onRohh Crrdeshouldhe closed Thislot onyhar l/Sspaces, which canadegualelyheservedhylhe accesrom.72a°Avemwe Retmovimglhe access onROMSlreel willhelp !o keeolhe churchlrafro om 22' ,4wwe cmdreduce thepolenllalfor whiclesparlamgimlhe meighhmhood The Church does not want to close the access on Robb St. The access serves as an important secondary access to the parking lot. Wheat Ridge also does not want this access closed. 3 Therorlhpar6nglolaccesrshouldheolignedmidwayhehveerrRohhCimleandthesoulhparlaaglot driveway lo m i a i m iz e left - Aviv c o nfli c G r. The western access is aligned so that vehicles can circulate around the new building and have a direct straight access to 32nd Ave. The traffic volume turning left from westbound 32nd Ave onto Robb St is minimal during the hours that the Church uses their access. Because of the low turning volumes, the conflicts will be minimal and the Church does not believe that there is a problem with turning traffic. Moving the access to the east will cause internal circulation problems for vehicles in the parking shown on the site plan. 4 The lra csludysupplememl /dated&27/2W4 doesmalshowhow the 20-yeartr cprofeclioms were derived Whalassumpllomswere uredforchurchgrowlhaudhackgrouadlraf~icgrowlhv The future Church traffic was estimated by using the 10% per year growth that the Church is presently experiencing. Thus the Church traffic was increased 200% to represent the 10% per year for 20 years. This estimate far exceeds the growth in traffic that is expected to occur, thus truly represents a worst case scenario for traffic volumes. Street traffic volumes were increased V2% per year. This growth rate is typical in Jefferson County for streets like 32nd Ave that are in built out areas. Even using such a high growth rate for the Church, the driveways continue to operate at acceptable LOS in the future. S The churchhz galleafew aciivilieslhallakeplace oliXedmeslayeveliimgform S-OOlo B OOpm The #2gric , r& dy sh o uld i m c lu de a m e v alu a tl o m of lh e a d a c e n l slr e e l /31 a/ p e a k p er i o o T the 2 y e a- am d 2 0 yearlraffchormoms Traffic counts were taken on a Wednesday evening in November and confirm that the traffic volumes are insignificant. The counts were taken from 5:30 pm to 6:30 pm. During that time eriod, practically all of the vehicles used the main parking lot on the south side of 32" Ave., only 2 or 3 vehicles were observed in the north lot. Pedestrians did cross 32d Ave and a crossing guard was present. Page 5 Applewood Baptist Church Response to Review2 January 11, 2005 The traffic crossing guard crossed pedestrians during gaps in traffic, and again only stopped vehicles that approached the cross walk while the pedestrians were crossing. The maximum number of vehicles stopped in either direction was 5. The attached traffic count diagram shows the number of vehicles during the hour traffic count. The LOS analysis shows that all intersections/ driveways were at LOS B or better. 6 The fiaj/restudystaleslhallhe~ educalranburldrngw/llbeoppmxrmalelly 000SFinsize Other plammmgdocumenlrindicalelhesize willhe claserlo 30, OOOSF please confirm the correclsize Also, r v r II 1h e new e du c a l r o m h u r ldr ng i n c r e a s e 1h e am o un 1 of e ve n l r /ac l i v r l i e s duri ng We a h es day e u e n i ng ar & d other weekdaytim eperiod:P Ifso lhisimcreaseshouldhe imclmdedim the weelydayamalysir. The Traffic Study inadvertently used the building foot print, not the square footage in the report. The correct square footage is approximately 22,500 square feet. The traffic study did not use the square footage in the traffic analysis. The existing traffic volumes were inflated to represent future conditions as discussed earlier. Sincerely, Fred Lantz, P.E. Enclosures: LOS Summary Traffic Volumes LOS Analysis Page 6 Applewood Baptist Church Response to Review2 January 11, 2005 Level of Service Calculations Wednesday Evening (5:30 - 6:00 PM) Roadway/Driveway Movement Existing LOS (1 Hour Count) Near Term LOS (With Ed Bldg) Future LOS (20 Year Projection) Robb St A A A WB Left B A A NB Left & Right B B B North Side - Western A A A EB Left A A A SB Left & Right A B B North Side - Center A EB Left A SB Left & Right B North Side - Eastern A A A EB Left A A A SB Left & Center A B B South Side A A A WB Left A A A NB Left B B B NB Right B B B Quail St A A A EB Left A A A WB Left A A A NB B B B SB B B B Traffic Counts - Wednesday Evening Applewood Baptist Church xsu - 6:30 pm m T 3 3 - o - ~ m p a a 3 W 47 2 X2 4 v~ X250 2 :263 X251 0 23 32nd Ave 51 313 4 1--,7 313 1 288 t5 ~o 290+ 0J' -q 2 = r r 319-) 25 22 N 3 w 9 ? ~ N U) L J O LANTZ ASSOCIATES January 2005 Applewood Baptist Church 2006 - Wednesday Evening 5:30-6:30 PM cn L_ O LANTZ ASSOCIATES January 2005 Applewood Baptist Church 2024 - Wednesday Evening 5:30-6:30 PM T t6 T I6 3 3 o ~ N Ul U W 82 d N X272 32nd Ave 16 a~ X210 90 ` f N 256 353 ~a 31~ 317 ai84 2 4 r~ 330 25 29 ~ 24 o ~ m in L_ O LANTZ ASSOCIATES January 2005 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: 32nd Ave & Robb St Existing Traffic - Wednesday Evening Intersection Capacity Utilization 28.2% ICU Level of Service Applewood Baptist Church LANTZ ASSOCIATES Volume;(rleh/h),.; 313 4 4 247. 6 _ 7 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Houriy.tTowrate,(veh/h) ,340. _ 4 "4 °26.8'. 7 ! „8 ' , Pedestrians Volume Total 345 4 268 14 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: 32nd Ave & West Driveway - NS Existing Traffic - Wednesday Evening .s t ti r Volume Total 1 347 273 0 yalumg L8ft ' . ' 0. S °0. '°0 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 Applewood Baptist Church LANTZ ASSOCIATES vofuin'e(vehlh) Y, 319 5,1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly=flow rate{uehlh), :9 34T,,"273 0 0 0 - Pedestrians HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: 32nd Ave & Middle Driveway - NS Existing Traffic - Wednesday Evening --1,, ~ 4, ►f Pedestrians Volume Total 7 340 276 5 Applewood Baptist Church LANTZ ASSOCIATES volume ~veh/h} E , 313 , 250 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 " 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Control Delay (s) 7.8 0.0 0.0 12.5 Approach Delay (s) 0.1 0.0 12.5 gt7p~`o~ch LOS ~ ~ $ HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: 32nd Ave & South Side Driveway Existing Traffic - Wednesday Evening Volume Riqht 27 0.20 0.01 0.16 Control Delay (s) 0.0 8.0 Applewood Baptist Church LANTZ ASSOCIATES Uolam (veti/t}f; , = ` 288 25 1.6 253 10 _I 6 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rafe (uehlh) , 31;3 , 27 17 2.75 11 _ 7 Pedestrians Volume Total 340 17 275 11 7 Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.5 12.2 Approach] LO,S . B` HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: 32nd Ave & East Driveway - NS Existing Traffic - Wednesday Evening Intersection Capacity Utilization 26.6% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church LANTZ ASSOCIATES 1(91 ufne (veh(h) . 4 " 290 251 2 0 _ 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hour~yfilow rde,(vehlh) 2" 0 ; 2 Pedestrians Right turn flare (veh) Median type ' None Median storage veh) VG, csanfli000olume :27, 5981' 274 vC1. staae 1 conf vol Volume Total 4 315 275 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 13: 32nd Ave & Quail St Existing Traffic - Wednesday Evening 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 2.2 2.2 cM capacity (veh/h) 1289 Applewood Baptist Church LANTZ ASSOCIATES Vfllume (vehlti~ 0 245, ` 22 23" 25211, 0 12 4' 29 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hnurty flow, rate (veh(h). 0 '.291 24- 25 274 0 13 4 32 2 1 1, Pedestrians Volume Total 0 315 25 274 49 4 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: 32nd Ave & Robb St 2006 - Wednesday Evening r F 4\ r Applewood Baptist Church LANTZ ASSOCIATES volume (u~h/h) 314 4 4 256 6 ; 7 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourtyflowrafa~aeh/h),.341 4-i 4 278 7 8 , Pedestrians vC ronfaicting Voliartie 346 630 343 p0,gefree%. 100" 99>99 cM capacity (veh/h) 1213 444 699 Volume Total 346 4 278 14 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: 32nd Ave & West Driveway - NS 2006 - Wednesday Evening Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.7% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church LANTZ ASSOCIATES Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly fiow,rate ~veh/,h) , 1,3 336. 278 11 8 4 Pedestrians Lane V7idih (ft) .r Walking Speed (ft/s) Petcerjt;Blockage - Volume Total 13 336 289 12 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: 32nd Ave & South Side Driveway 2006 - Wednesday Evening ~i 4~ F 4\ P Volume Total 343 17 278 11 7 Uotume,Lett;: 0 17 -0 19 = 0 Volume Riaht 27 0 0 0 7 Volume to Caoacity 0.20 0.01 0.16 0.03 0.01 0.0 8.0 0.0 13.6 10.1 0.0 0.5 12.3 Applewood Baptist Church LANTZ ASSOCIATES V6lurri (vehlh) 297 25 , _ 16 256 10 ? . 6 , Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly=#law;rate°(veh/h) 36 27, ,7 278 11 7 Pedestrians cM capacity (veh/h) 1216 432 712 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: 32nd Ave & East Driveway - NS 2006 - Wednesday Evening t ~ ~ t ti r Applewood Baptist Church LANTZ ASSOCIATES Volume (uehlh);,',5, `=292 1 289 3' 1. 3 .11 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 H6gdjKWrate.( ehlh) 5 . 317 292 . - 3 1 3 Pedestrians Volume Total 5 317 296 4 Volume Left . , 5' 0 ; 0 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: 32nd Ave & Quail St 2006 - Wednesday Evening ~ ~ ~ #e t ~N t ~ ti 1 Applewood Baptist Church LANTZ ASSOCIATES ValumE (veh/h) . 9 , 270 22 23 259 1 f12 4•" 29 2 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly_flow rate (ueh/I1 , 1 293 24 282 1 13 4 32 2 3 1 Pedestrians Volume Total 1 317 25 283 49 4 Voldmg"Left 1 . n~ 0 ' ` 25 `0 . "13 ; 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: 32nd Ave & Robb St 2024 - Wednesday Evening Volyrrie {veh7h) 353 4 4. 282 . 7 - 8 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Houtly_filowrate{veh/h) 384 4 _4 307 8 9 Pedestrians Lane N/idth {ft) ' Walking Speed (fUs) Percent;Blo(*age Right turn flare (veh) Mediarrp~ ' None S Median storage veh) VC '388, Intersection Capacity Utilization 30.5% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church LANTZ ASSOCIATES F 4% r Volume Total 388 4 307 16 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: 32nd Ave & West Driveway - NS 2024 - Wednesday Evening t- t V r Right turn flare (veh) M~dianiype• None Median storage veh) vC,c 4fltpiti lume 313 730 i 304 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf _uol tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) . tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0'queeiree,"/o - 97 97 98 cM capacity (veh/h) 1247 379 735 Applewood Baptist Church LANTZ ASSOCIATES Voltuha,{veh/h) ; 31 330 272 16" 12 14 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 "rly#IowFate(ueh/h) 34 358 296 11 13 15 Pedestrians Volume Total 34 359 313 28 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: 32nd Ave & South Side Driveway 2024 - Wednesday Evening ~ 7 ~ F 14\ /1, Pedestrians Intersection Capacity Utilization 29.8% ICU Level of Service A Applewood Baptist Church LANTZ ASSOCIATES Vo10 me;(y0h,1 317 25 16 278 10 6 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Volume Total 372 17 302 11 7 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: 32nd Ave & East Driveway - NS 2024 - Wednesday Evening Right turn flare (veh) Medlar)„type - 'None Median storage veh) uC eQrrlicting volume; 326 680 ' 321 vC1. staae 1 conf vol tC, single (s) 4. tF cM capacity Applewood Baptist Church LANTZ ASSOCIATES \/olyme;(veh/h}, 315 290 10 Z 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92- N b-d-d flow-rate (tieFi/h) " 9." - 342 _ 315 11 2 4 Pedestrians Volume Total 9 342 326 7 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: 32nd Ave & Quail St 2024 - Wednesday Evening turn flare Median storage veh) uC, Gonflicting'volume `312, 343 6.99 699 330, 722 711 311, vC1. staoe 1 conf vol tC, single (s) 4. tF cM capacity Applewood Baptist Church LANTZ ASSOCIATES Uolu/rr{vehm) 1 ,292,' 24 25 2$6 1 =13 4, .32r 2 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flout/ rate ~veh/h): 1 317 26 , - 27 311 1 14 41 A6 2 1 1 Pedestrians Volume Total 1 343 27 312 53 4 LANTZ ASSOCIATES 13335 W.72ioCir. Arvada, CO 80005 (303) 887-3714 (303)423.4949 fax August 27, 2004 David F. Brossman Development Review Engineer City of Wheat Ridge 7500 West 29" Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 RE: Applewood Baptist Church Response to First Review Comments Traffic Impact Study Dear Mr. Brossman: This is in response to your first review of the Traffic Impact Study for the Applewood Baptist Church located at 11225 W. 32"d Ave. I have included the Comments from Steve Nguyen for your use. 1. It appears that the proposed expansion is considered as an increase in the supportfacilities (or secondary use). The traffic increase related to the expansion needs to be projected accordingly. As related to this proposed expansion, additional data and discussion are needed to support the 20% increase to church traffic as indicated in the study. As a suggestion, yearly membership counts can also be provided to assist in establishing the potential background growth. The Church has provided average attendance numbers that show the attendance has grown from approximately 510 in 2000 to 910 estimated for 2004. The increase each year has varied from 6 to 33% with growth tapering off in the most recent years. Thi: is an average increase of 100 people per year over the past 4 years. That relates to an average increase of 11% per year over the 4 year period. Church School attendance has also increased, but at a slower rate. Church School attendance has increased 10% per year over the past 4 years. The 20% increase in traffic was derived from this projected increase. It was assumed that it would take approximately 2 years for the Education Building to be opened from the date of this original study. Page 2 Response to Review 1 Applewood Baptist Church Traffic Impact Study August 27, 2004 2. Since the proposed west access will function similar to an offset intersection with Robb Street. Please allow adequate distance to minimize left turn conflicts. A discussion is needed to address this configuration in terms of traffic operation and safety. The Church presently has three access points on the north side of 32nd Ave. The proposal is to close one of the access points to eliminate one access on 32nd Ave. The western access will allow adequate storage for left turning traffic in the existing two way left turn lane. As the site plan is finalized, the location of the driveway will be such that it will minimize the left turn conflict with the Robb St intersection. 3. Please provide a trip generation table to identify existing and new traffic generated by this expansion. This will include arty peak hours ofthe adjacent streets or the generator. A trip generation table is included below based upon the traffic counts taken on 32nd Ave between the second and third services on Sunday morning. This period was determined to have the most impact on 32nd Ave as it has the most traffic leaving the site at the same time traffic is entering the site. This table also shows the trips projected with Education Building completed as well as future trips based on the Church's present growth rate. A drawing showing the counts along 32nd Ave is included in the enclosure. Church Trips Along 32nd Ave Existing With Ed Bldg Future (20 Year) In Out In Out In Out 50 135 59 162 109 297 4. LOS calculation needs to address both short and long-term trafc for all locations. 20 year horizon will be used as long-term traffic condition. Additional LOS calculations were made for existing conditions, for near term conditions and for the future. The Trips are shown in the table above. Drawings showing the near term and long term are included in the enclosure. A summary of the LOS conditions is shown in the following table. Page 3 Response to Review 1 Applewood Baptist Church Traffic Impact Study August 27, 2004 Level of Service Calculations One Hour Counts (August 2004) Near Term (With Education Building) Future Projections (20 years) Roadway/Driveway Movement Existing LOS (1 Hour Count) Near Term LOS (With Ed Bldg) Future LOS (20 Year Projection) Robb St A A A WB Left A A A NB Left & Right B B B North Side - Western A A A EB Left A A A SB Left & Right B B B North Side - Center A EB Left A SB Left & Right B North Side - Eastern A A A EB Left A A A SB Left & Center B B B South Side A A A WB Left A A A NB Left B B B NB Right A A A Quail St (South) A A A WB Left A A A NB Left & Right B B B Quail St (North) A A A EB Left A A A SB Left & Right B B B As the above table indicates, all of the movements at the intersections along 32nd Ave will operate at LOS B or better now and in the future. This indicates that 32nd Ave can easily accommodate the increased traffic from the Church. Page 4 Response to Review 1 Applewood Baptist Church Traffic Impact Study August 27, 2004 5. Traffic counts and LOS analyses will need to be included for the intersection of Quail and Robb at 32"d Avenue since they are part of the church traffic circulation and access. Traffic counts were taken at both intersections. The additional LOS analysis does include both intersections. 6 Traffic count will need to be a full hour of the busiest period as needed for standard analysis. Additional traffic counts were taken for a one hour period as requested. 7. Please indicate other time of the week when thefacility has a significant use. Include traffic figures if they are considered significant for analysis. The Church is open daily and has some functions during the week. None of the functions are significant when compared to the Sunday Services and thus were not included in the analysis. 8. Parking supply seems to be adequate for current use based on observations conducted by the Public Works Department. However, additional parking will need to be identified and addressed to accommodate the proposed expansion to prevent overflow onto adjacent streets. Overflow parking on adjacent streets tends to have traffic impacts on the neighborhoods in various ways based on previous experiences. The Church has implemented several measures to address the impact of Church vehicles parked on adjacent streets. They have asked their members not to park on the street in front of neighbor's homes. This has decreased on street parking considerably. They have also started a shuttle service to bring in members by bus from an off site parking location. Page 5 Response to Review 1 Applewood Baptist Church Traffic Impact Study August 27, 2004 The attached enclosures have details supporting the above answers. I trust that this answers your questions concerning the Traffic Impact Study for the Applewood Baptist Church Education Building expansion. The additional analysis provided in this letter does not change the recommendation in the original Traffic Impact Study. As this additional analysis shows 32nd Ave can easily accommodate the additional that could be generated by the addition of the Education Building on the north side of 32nd Ave. If you have any further questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Fred Lantz, P.E. Cc: Duffy Deardorff, Applewood Baptist Church Enclosures: Traffic Volumes LOS Analysis City Comments Letter Applewood Baptist Church Near Term Traffic (With New Ed Bldg) Co U) z z T m m 3 3 m m ~ O m w z T M° 10 54 c 1 8 X3 226 -iss F 2a 4 21 214 ~ 249 ~ 2 217 24 9-- m 23 n M M ~ N ~ N I m in n ` O o d a in t 0 August 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Applewood Baptist Church Future Traffic (20 years) Co z Co z T m T m 3 3 m m o ~ m 3 ~ w z z T 19 00 18 Na 2 N O X4 264 ~zzs r20 239- 2 241 280- 3 --3 21 20 _ 21 N 0 N~ y m in N > 9 ~ N a cf) L 0 O cf) August 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: 32nd Ave & Robb St Traffic Counts - Between Middle Services Volume Total 238 3 272 18 VolumeLeft D 3 ; 0 12 Volume Right 2 0 0 7 cSH 1700 1329 :1700 592 Volume to Capacity 0.14 0.00 0.16 0.03 Control Delay (s) 0.0 7.7 0.0 11.3 Applewood Baptist Church August 2004 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Volume (veh/h) 217, 2 ! 3 250, 11 6 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourlyflow rate (veh/h) , 236 -2 3 272 12 7 Pedestrians Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.1 11.3 Approach LOS B Applewood Baptist Church Preliminary Drainage Report August 31, 2006 Revision Preliminary Drainage Report (Proposed Structure and Parking Lot) APPLEWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH 11225 W. 32nd Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado Prepared By in Civil Engineering and Land Development 2130 Kipling Street Lakewood, Colorado 80215 303.987.3980 303.987.3988 Fax MSEA Project Number 01-56 Revised August 31, 2006 March 31, 2006 111~11 _'C 1~ aL~ ` Applewood Baptist Church Preliminary Drainage Report August 31, 2006 Revision APPROVAL BLOCKS FOR DRAINAGE REPORT I. ENGINEER'S STATEMENT. I hereby certify that this report (plan) for the preliminary drainage design of the Applewood Baptist Church site was prepared by me (or under my direct supervision) in accordance with the provisions of the City of Wheat Ridge Storm Drainage Design and Technical Criteria for the Responsible Parties thereof. I understand that the City of Wheat Ridge does not and shall not assume liability for any drainage facilities designed by others. al Gary D. Tfeandbr, P.E. Registere Professional Engineer State of Colorado P.E. #27468 Applewood Baptist Church Preliminary Drainage Report August 31, 2006 Revision Table of Contents INTRODUCTION Page 1 HISTORICAL DRAINAGE SYSTEM Page 2 PROPOSED DEVELOPED DRAINAGE SYSTEM Page 2,3 CONCLUSIONS Page 4 REFERENCES Page 4 APPENDIX A Page 5 PROPOSED DRAINAGE PLAN In Pocket HISTORIC DRAINAGE PLAN In Pocket Applewood Baptist Church Preliminary Drainage Report August 31, 2006 Revision L INTRODUCTION A. SYTELOCATION 1) The site is located on north side of West 32nd Avenue between Simms Street and Quail Street, City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson. The site is further described as being located in Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the 6t' Principal Meridian, the NW1/4 of Section 28. 2) The site is adjacent to the Applewood Knolls 12th Filing. B. SITE DESCRIPTION 1) The total site consists of an area of 14.67 acres. For the purposes of this report, only the area to be disturbed for the addition of a new education building and associated parking lot, approximately 7.0 Acres, will be considered. 2) An existing 8295 SF education building footprint, and associated parking, covers approximately 2.66 acres of the site. The remaining area of the site consists primarily of natural vegetation. 3) The north end of the site lies within the Lena Gulch Major Drainageway. 4) Existing drainage facilities consist of: • A detention pond area north of the west parking lot, and surface detention in the parking lot northeast of the existing building. • 24-inch and 36-inch diameter CMP storm drainage pipes running along the west property line in an existing 10-foot wide drainage easement. • Lena Gulch flows northeasterly through the northern part of the property. • A minor tributary flows northwesterly into Lena Gulch through the north half of the property. C. PROPOSED PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1) The project consists of excavation for overlot grading, construction of required detention facilities, parking lot, and an education building. 2) The proposed land use shall be church facilities. D. FLOOD HAZARD AND DRAINAGESTUDY 1) Flood zone limits are depicted according to the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District study for Lena Gulch by Wright-McLaughlin Engineers date April 12, 1975. This flood zone information was provided by the City of Wheat Ridge. Page 1 of 5 Applewood Baptist Church Preliminary Drainage Report August 31, 2006 Revision II1 HISTORICAL DRAINAGE SYSTEM A. MAJOR BASIN 1. The site is contributory to the Lena Gulch Major Drainageway. Basin characteristics are described in the Manual on Drainage Maps, Urban Drainage & Flood Control District (UD&FCD). 2. Major Basin drainage characteristics and planned land uses as defined by the Planning Division. The Major Basin, Lena Gulch, is a natural local drainageway, which flows northeasterly through the north end of the proposed Lot 2 of the subdivision. B. HISTORICSUB-BASIN DESCRIPTION 1. The existing site has been divided into two sub-basins. Basin "HA" is presently detained on-site and Basin "HUN" flows offsite undetained. 2. The existing Church facilities include two existing detention ponds/areas with a computed storage volume of approximately 29,000 cubic feet, which exceeds the minimum required (computed using current standards) by approximately 9,000 cubic feet. 3. The site is historically one basin. Drainage runoff from the entire site historically has flowed overland in a sheet flow manner and discharging into the Lena Gulch Drainageway. III, PROPOSED DEVELOPED DRAINAGE SYSTEM A. CRITERIA 1. The proposed developed site is divided into 3 sub-basins. Basin "A" is detained on site. Basin "UN1" flows offsite undetained to the east and north/northeast, and Basin "UN2" flows undetained to the west. 2. Basin 'A' includes the proposed detention pond, all of the proposed parking lot area, and the proposed education building. (6.35 acres) 3. Basin 'UN1' consists of proposed landscaped areas and undisturbed existing landscaped areas along the east property line. (0.29 acres) 4. Basin 'UN2' consists of proposed landscaped areas and undisturbed existing landscaped areas along the west property line. (0.45 Acres) Page 2 of 5 Applewood Baptist Church Preliminary Drainage Report August 31, 2006 Revision 5. The Rational Method was selected to determine rainfall criteria since the subject property is less than 15 acres. Minimum required detention volumes and maximum release rates were determined in accordance with the criteria in Storage, UD&FCD, Volume 2. 6. Design storm peak flows and required detention volumes were determined using a 5-yr frequency for the minor storm and a 100-yr frequency for the major storm per City of Wheat Ridge Figure 5-1. B. RUNOFF Basin 'A' flows into the proposed detention pond located adjacent to the north end of the proposed parking lot. The proposed detention pond will have a controlled release outlet structure, which will control release into the existing drainage easement along the west property line of Lot 2 of the proposed subdivision. 2. Runoff from the presently existing church facilities, Historic Basin `HA' (3.48 Acres) is calculated to be 7.7 cfs for the 5-year storm event and 17.8 for the 100-year storm event. This compares to the calculated runoff for the Proposed Development Basin `A' (6.35 Acres) of 13.9 cfs for the 5-year event and 30.3 cfs for the 100-year event. 3. Basins 'UN1' and 'UN2' flow offsite undetained. The flows generated from these small basins are not anticipated to have any adverse impact upon adjacent properties. C. DETENTION The minimum required detention volume (MRDV) for the developed Basin `A' is approximately 36,369 cubic feet volume, and the Minimum Water Quality Capture Volume is computed to be 8,250 cubic feet volume. Consequently, 44,619 cubic feet of detention storage is required. Approximately 45,000 cubic feet of storage volume is provided in the proposed detention pond. 2. The adjusted maximum release rate for the developed basins for the initial (5-yr) storm is 1.1 ds and for the major (100-yr) storm is 5.0 cfs. Both will be controlled by the outlet structure in the proposed detention pond, and conveyed to the existing drainage easement along the west property line of Lot 2 of the proposed subdivision, with eventually discharge into Lena Gulch. These adjusted rates were determined by reducing the maximum allowable release rate by the calculated runoff from the undetained Basins `UN1" and `UN2'. Please refer to the calculations provided in the Appendix. Page 3 of 5 Applewood Baptist Church Preliminary Drainage Report August 31, 2006 Revision 3. The detention pond will include an emergency overflow weir for excess storm water passage. This downstream slope area will be stabilized with rip-rap. The emergency overflow will be conveyed to the existing drainage easement along the west property line of Lot 2 of the proposed subdivision and eventually discharge into Lena Gulch. 4. The existing detention pond, located at the north end of the west asphalt parking lot, will not exist after the construction of the proposed parking lot, and will be replaced by the proposed detention pond located at the north end of the proposed parking lot. IV, CONCLUSIONS A. IMPACT OFIMPROVEMEVTS 1. The proposed drainage improvements will provide adequate facilities to balance the increased runoff resulting from the additional impervious areas associated with the new building and parking lot. 2. The proposed detention pond was sized to meet or exceed the minimum required storage volumes. 3. Parking lot storm flows will be maintained at or below allowable depths. Storm drain inlets are proposed at the north end of the proposed parking lot to capture the storm runoff from Basin `A'. 4. No adverse impacts to adjacent properties are anticipated. B. AREAS IN FLOOD HAZARD ZONE 1. There are no improvements proposed in the flood hazard zone associated with Lena Gulch. V, REFERENCES A. Site Drainage Requirements Rev, 04/06City of Wheat Ridge. B. Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manua/, Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, prepared by Wright-McLaughlin Engineers, updated 2001. Page 4 of 5 Applewood Baptist Church Preliminary Drainage Report August 31, 2006 Revision Appendix A Page 5 of 5 TABLE 1 (Proposed) RATIONAL METHOD Calculations for Runoff Coefficients (C-Values) STANDARD COEFFICIENTS ROOFED PAVED CONCRETE LANDSCAPED 5-Yr 0.85 0.88 0.87 0.15 10-YR 0.90 0.90 0.88 0.25 100-YR 0.90 0.93 0.89 0.50 BASIN AREA DISTRIBUTION TOTAL AREA ROOF AREA PAVED AREA CONCRETE LANDSCAPED BASIN (Ac) (Ac) (Ac) AREA (Ac) AREA (Ac) %IMP 0.9 0 A 6.351 0.521 3.862 0.463 1.505 74.8% LN1 0.288 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.288 0.0% UN2 0.453 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.453 0.0% TOTAL AREAS 7.0911 0.5211 3.862 0.463 2.246 66.9% CALCULATE 5-YR WEIGHTED "C" COEFFICIENTS- WEIGHTED ROOF AREA PAVED AREA CONCRETE LANDSCAPED BASIN "C" "C" "C" AREA "C" AREA "C" A 0.704 0.850 0.880] 0.870 ] 0150 UN1 0.150 0.850 0.880 0.870 0.150 UN2 j 0.1501 0.850 0.8801 0.870] 0150 CALCULATE 100-YR WEIGHTED "C" COEFFICIENTS- WEIGHTED ROOF AREA PAVED AREA CONCRETE LANDSCAPED BASIN "C" "C" "C" AREA "C" AREA "C" A 0.823 j 0.900 j 0.930 1 0.890 j 0.500 UN1 0.500 0.900 0 930 0.890 0.500 UN2 0.5001 0.900] 0.9301 0.8901 0.500 Applewood Baptist Church Page Al N Z O a F- n a O O J Z _O r a U L Vl c co m O m N O O M ~ N O. m CL 3 Q ¢ U O.O. m ao N O LL LL L.QO ^L. Z CL w N J } m ~ `a r (n O O X 0 0 z (A r LO ~ w w 0 O O W ~ r H " J N O W > Cl W r a O O ~ r W J LO LO (O I- M Lq y. N V Cl) 0 r a) r- C G ~ r 0 0 p i O N O CV i+ o r N V U) ~ C G! O M U Y N M > m O ° J LO M Q N U w co 0 0 v Q r 0n 0~ Q L M V V C v r 00 Cl) Q V N j ( 7 T Z Q Q (6 0 0 M 0 T7 LO r r W m 0 0 0 U Z Z N Q w O » 0 U) U. 0 LL QO 0Z CL M ~ W } ..I 0 00 a 0 0 C) z OO 6 L' a U w 0 O O LL1 _ co 1- C) J y O W ; Q E. w r a O J _ CD ~ z w J M 0 h U N V co O rr r 0 _ i+ rl- O O i N N O N o r N = V U R = O O O M V' U L CN M O C ° J Q co V * O N co o 0 co M O U w o r [ j io c 0 ^ co N N a r L6 66 C v -co M Q M N V V Z Q Q O 0 0 Q M O O n CD m W U) In M W °o O O O U Z wO Q a » o Q a L U .Q m o] O 9 O cx a TABLE 4 (Proposed) MINIMUM REQUIRED DETENTION VOLUME (MRDV) V;=Required Detention Volume in cubic feet Q;=Maximum Allowable Release Rate I=Developed Basin Imperviousness (see Table 1) Ki=Detention Constant (defined below) A= Area of Subbasin V5=K5A K5=(0.77*1-2.65)/1000 V10o=K10oA K100=(1.78*1 - 0.0021- 3.56)/900 MRDV SUBBASIN I A (Acres) V5=K5*A (ft') V100=K100A (fta) A 74.8% 6.351 15189.56 36368.64 UN1 0.0% 0.288 0.00 0.00 UN2 0.0% 0.453 0.00 0.00 TABLE 5 (Proposed) WATER QUALITY CAPTURE VOLUME (WQCV) UDFCD Storm Drainage Criteria Manual, VOL 3, "Structural BMPs" EXTENDED DETENTION BASIN DESIGN wqcv =(0.91 * 13 - 1.19 . 12 + 0.78 * I) WQCV = (wqcv/12)*1.2*A WQCV SUBBASIN V100 WQCV 100+WQCV (ff) A 36368.64 8249.73 44618.37 UNi 0.00 0.00 0.00 UN2 0.00 0.00 0.00 Equations for Maximum Allowable Release (QRI) QR5=0.2A QR15o=1.0*A TABLE 6 (Proposed) MAXIMUM RELEASE RATES (QRl) SUBBASIN A (Acres) QR5 (cfs) QR100 (cfs) A 6.351 1.270 6.351 UN1 0.288 0.058 0.288 UN2 0.453 0.091 0.453 TOTAL 7.091 1.418 7.091 Adjusted Maximum Allowable Release Total Site Allowable Release Rate to be reduced by peak flows of developed undetained basin. TABLE 7 (Proposed) ADJUSTED MAXIMUM RELEASE RATES Q5 Q100 (cfs) (cfs) A 1.416 7.091 -UN1 0.212 1.324 -UN2 0.333 2.084 TOTAL 1.085 T 5.007 * From Tables 2 & 3 Applewood Baptist Church Page A3 TABLE 1 (Historic) RATIONAL METHOD Calculations for Runoff Coefficients (C-Values) STANDARD COEFFICIENTS ROOFED PAVED CONCRETE LANDSCAPED 5-Yr 0.85 0.88 0.87 0.15 10-YR 0.90 0.90 0.88 0.25 100-YR 0.90 0.93 0.89 0.50 BASIN AREA DISTRIBUTION TOTAL AREA ROOF AREA PAVED AREA CONCRETE LANDSCAPED BASIN (Ac) (Ac) (Ac) AREA (Ac) AREA (Ac) %IMP 0.9 0.9 . 0 HA 3.485 0.192 0.835 1.209 1.250 60.1% HUN 3.606 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.606 0.0% TOTAL AREAS 1 7.0911 0.1921 0.835 1.209 4.856 29.5% CALCULATE 5-YR WEIGHTED "C" COEFFICIENTS- WEIGHTED ROOF AREA PAVED AREA CONCRETE LANDSCAPED BASIN "C" "C" "C" AREA "C" AREA "C" HA 0.6131 0.8501 08801 08701 n i sn U.1 CALCULATE 100-YR WEIGHTED "C" COEFFICIENTS- WEIGHTED ROOF AREA PAVED AREA CONCRETE LANDSCAPED BASIN "C" "C" "C" AREA "C" AREA "C" Applewood Baptist Church Page Al N Z O L~ r Q a /O V O W J Z `O r L t U N a'D N O M O N a O Cl) 3 N N 0. m O. = ¢ ¢ U O i CL 0 L 0 U- 4" U. 00 =z N J Q.' >7 m LO LQ r s a Z N N _0 Fn W O W H W Lu n > W a O J U 2 H O Z W J d' O (V V O 0 +:s r N d E .0 . 1 + M O P L N C6 ,4: ma CL O C V co c0 = L O O O U w v > LO O ° J M ~ ¢ V: U w ^ (O I~ Q L M N r C Q co n U ¢ ~ C9 z ¢ M M Q M O m m Ln 0 6 D ' v/ Z (7 Z ¢ Z O W a = o L LL 4I 0 Nz Cl) W O m o LQ V C) Z N N (7 V5 W O W C C s F W a L V W CL O J N O Z W J V O r N C s d ~ 0 Cl) O L O M V O C V U d ° V LOO O > a u~ O c J ¢ ~ ° g n o0 U N n CO II U d Q L CO V' L C co CD 0 co O U ,It (D Z ¢ ¢ M M CD C~ CD m LO m o 0 0 ~ U N Z z ¢ Z O = W _ z a) 0) co IL t 3 L U N .Q N m O 9 N n a TABLE 4 (Historic) MINIMUM REQUIRED DETENTION VOLUME (MRDV) V;=Required Detention Volume in cubic feet Qi=Maximum Allowable Release Rate 1=Developed Basin Imperviousness (see Table 1) Ki=Detention Constant (defined below) A= Area of Subbasin VS=K5A K5=(0.77*1-2.65)/1000 V1oo=KiooA K,oo=(1.78*1-0.00212-3.56)/900 MRDV SUBBASIN I A (Acres) V5=K6*A (ft3) V100=K1ooA (ft3) HA 60.1% 3.485 6626.05 16232.51 HUN 0.0% 3.606 0.00 0.00 TABLE 5 (Historic) WATER QUALITY CAPTURE VOLUME (WQCV) UDFCD Storm Drainage Criteria Manual, VOL 3, "Structural BMPs" EXTENDED DETENTION BASIN DESIGN wqcv=(0.91 *13-1.19*12+0.78*1) WQCV = (wqcv/12)*1.2*A WQCV "too+WQCV SUBBASIN V100 WQCV (ft3) HA 16232.51 3591.55 19824.06 HUN 0.00 0.00 0.00 Equations for Maximum Allowable Release (QR!) QR5=0.2A QRm0=1.0*A TABLE 6 (Historic) MAXIMUM RELEASE RATES (QRJ SUBBASIN QR5 A (Acres) (cfs) QR100 (cfs) HA 3.485 0.697 1 3.485 HUN 3.606 0.721 3.606 TOTAL 7.091 1.418 7.091 Adjusted Maximum Allowable Release Total Site Allowable Release Rate to be reduced by peak flows of developed undetained basin. TABLE 7 (Historic) ADJUSTED MAXIMUM RELEASE RATES Q5 (cfs) Q100 (cfs) HA 1.418 7.091 -HUN 1.461 TOTAL -0.042 -1.744 * From Tables 2 & 3 Applewood Baptist Church Page A3 TABLE RO.3 Recommended Percentage Imperviousness Values Land Use or Surface Characteristics Percentage Imperviousness Business: Commercial areas 95 Neighborhood areas 85 Residential: Single-family Multi-unit detached 60 Multi-unit attached 75 Half-acre lot or larger Apartments 80 Industrial: Light areas 80 Heavy areas 90 Parks, cemeteries 5 Playgrounds 10 Schools 50 Railroad and areas 15 Undeveloped Areas: Historic flow analysis 2 Greenbelts, agricultural 2 Off-site flow analysis when land use not defined 45 Streets: Paved 100 Gravel (packed) 40 Drive and walks 90 Roofs 90 Lawns, sand soil 0 Lawns, clayey soil 0 *See Figures RO-3 through RO.5, Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual, Volume 1, June 2001, for percentage imperviousness. 14 DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL TABLE 3-1 (42) RECOMMENDED-RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS AND PERCENT IMPERVIOUS LAND USE OR SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS Business: Commercial Areas Neighborhood Areas Residential: Single-Family Multi-Unit (detached) Multi-Unit (attached) 112 Acre Lot or Larger Apartments Industrial: Light Areas Heavy Acres Parks, Cemetaries: Playgrounds: Schools: Railroad Yard Areas Undeveloped Areas: Historic Flow Analysis- PERCENT FREQUENCY PERVIOUS 2 5 10 100 95 .87 .87 .88 .89 70 .60 .65 .70 .80 * .40 .45 .50 .60 50 .45 .50 .60 .70 70 .60 .65 .70 .80 * .30 .35 .40 .60 70 _65 .70 .70 .80 80 .71 .72 76 .82 - 90 .80 .80 .85 .90 7 .10 .18 .25 .45 13 .15 .20 .30 .50 50 .45 .50 .60 .70 20 .20 .25 .35 .45 2 (See "Lawns") RUNOFF Greenbelts, Agricultural Offsite Flow Analysis 45 .43 .47 .55 .65 (when land use not defined) Streets: Paved 100 .87 .88 .90 .93 Gravel (Packed) 40 .40 .45 .50 .60 Drive and Walks: 96 .87 .87 .88 89 Roofs: 90 .80 .85 .90 .90 Lawns, Sandy Soil 0 .00 .01 .05 .20 Lawns, Clayey Soil 0 .05 .15 .25 .50 NOTE: These Rational Formula coeffic ients may not be valid for large basins. *See Figure 2-1 for percent impervious. 11-1-90 URBAN DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 9 8 T z 0 6 w a co 5 w x U 2 1 4 } F !n 2 w l z 3 2 1 0 0 i i I ` I I 1 ~I I i I I ~F I ~ K~ y I S I 4 i i NE I 2 YEAR 10 N 20 30 40 50 60 m TIME IN MINUTES FIGURE 5-1 EXAMPLE 5.2 TIME - INTENSITY - FREQUENCY CURVES T. 3 S. . R.66 W. 5-1-84 URBAN DRAINAGE a FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT LEGEND PROPERTY LINE Flo. o#e y EASEMENT LINE 31 T,/ ---5425--- EXISITNG GRADE CONTOUR J lA... 5425 FINISH GRADE CONTOUR ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ DRAINAGE BASIN BOUNDARY BASIN _ t DESIGNATION Ca RUNOFF A COEFFICIENT - _ f ° ~'~'s ~ 3,48 0.87 BASIN AREA C goo RUNOFF u ~ ~ x y ~ (ACRES) COEFFICIENT ~ t a i"'x n u ?:TM ..max a.F E i 'h 1 dn' - e D ~ 44TH AVE o a ~ CLEAR CREEK e 0 38TH AVE c~n c~ i~ o Z I ~ APPLEWOODI KNdLLS 1 2~TH FILI I ~I ZONED R-1 ~ SITE J I a PORTION OF TRACT 12 ~ 33RD AVE Y BROOKSIDE SUBDIVISION I ~ LOT 1 I LOT 2 I LOT 3 ~ ~ ~ 32ND AVE \f oa 0 J ~ ~o~ W ~ NY I ~ ~ f L~ ~ ~ J ;A4 y ilfl V ~ ~ ~ Z Q facer ~ 6 ~ \\lS j . m I ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~y /Ytl ~ ~ ~ 26TH AVE i T~ 4 1  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ f , i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~n 4 CP V~ ~ .P ` / ~ ~ ' ~ ,,.r 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ' / i ~ ! ~ ~ PORTION OF TRACT tit 0 ~ ~ ~ BROOKSIDE SUBDIVISION,.'`', l ~ '~i, y ` ~ 1 8' SANITARY SE1~lER ~ ZON'E~'R.=~.l'~---' ~ ~ '~c~ .p; c~~ ~ 1 EA`aFMEN~`, 'i `ilk---~'~\ i ~ i a~,~ ~ v BK. X939, 408 ~ ~h~~°` i ~1 \ i°~~, NOTE; SEWS LIN~ NOT , ~a`\ ~ ~ ~ ~a,,IN EASEMENI~~ N T~ _ - - - .a _ i v. r~~r_P_-._ cA ~ S` ~ i 1 1 t`' . , ~ i ~ ~ ~ 1 lW ~ r ss~ t ti' Y ~ ti ~ tai \1 i ~ ~ , ~ 1 ~ "tie ~ 1 1 ~T PORTION OF TRACT 11 ~ ~~~~~~1~~*:\~~~~~; \ ; ,~~1 BROOKSIDE SUBDIVISION I~ , ; \ ~ r'.'~ ZONED R-1 rj N i i i ~ ~ i ~r' ~ i ~ i ~vi AI N TE'~R1AE ~ `y~~ ~ ; ,'t ~ ~ ~ ~ l l ~ r t I I Y t, t pip 1,~~ REC!~''(V0. F02082~~ i~ r~~~ \ ~ 4~ ~ ~ i~/ ; ' l~ is i' ~S. ~ J ~ f ~ ~ f 427 ~ / i ~ ~ Ji ~ 1 7 ~ V j S00°33'14~E ~ . . 1~~„ `i-''~~~ ~~~Ii f'~~ t~~ n ~ ; ~ 6.00 i % ~0~'~3 li4 ~ ~~ii -~..a 'O ~ ~ ~u ~i . / 'S i ~ o cn '~1~ r(~tiitn~ ~N`y ~ ~ ~ ~ A_~ ,~t K f r W'/i~~~, ~X.~\ ~-~i~\~: 0a\ll'~~`~ fit' ~ 7 1 TRACT B rt ~ . ~l~y~ ~~~'~~~z.~ / ~O~ i BANZHAF SUBDIVISION N, r. ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ►~;;i I; N_ • ~ ~ _ i• ZONED ~PIITARY SEWER ~ ~ \ "I~~ , ~ ~ EASEMENT ~ %~`n i ~~~;~I~~~ii;~#;i~~ 1~~ ~~6~ SANITARY SEWER rn , ` ~,i~~i i~l,i ~ A~EMENT 'e?.__'~r~...... BK. 1616, PG. 158 ~ ~ ; ~ ~~,~~1,,~I,;~ ~s~ cn eK~ spa, PG. 580 / Ff ~ NOTE: SEWER LINE NOT ~ I~ ~ ~~►'i1~~~~~i~~" ~ i~ 1;`~ ' IN EASEMENT ~Y ~1~,1i ~,'~~~I\`I ~„~.c~,b ' - 1 S00'34 33 E ~~\_~"i\\`,~ ~'=~?-~~N: ; t 16.00. ~ ' - rte.........--w..-,~ ~~R~.-elf-,mil-3~+~l~l~...l~-. ~ j~ S00 34 33"~ ; ~8'I>~~4\.\~,~~'~,~; 11 I L~ ~ PORTION OF TRACT 10 J i ~ ~s~\' BROOKSIDE SUBDIVISION.' i ~ `R ~ 16054 33 E ~r y~` . Z0~1F~~1~NG~ 8" ~ I ~ INV 317.95 i--} SANITARY SEWER l' .i T r`  Q w Cadf 11910 DRAINAGE W i W 00 C7 I ~ Mars 1 " 50' Q O Z Z I ~ i a i ~ U I ~ f O I ~ i i I ~ I ~ LEGEND PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT LINE ---5425--- EXISITNG GRADE CONTOUR D ~ 44TH AVE 5425 FINISH GRADE CONTOUR 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ DRAINAGE BASIN BOUNDARY Q ~ GEAR CREEK BASIN J L DESIGNATION Ca RUNOFF A COEFFICIENT ~ r 3.48 0.87 BASIN AREA C goo RUNOFF (ACRES) COEFFICIENT 38TH AVE c~n c~ 1 ~4J1`~ c~~ y ~ o z ~ SITE - 33RD AVE Y ~ ~ c~n 32ND AVE ~ ,~5 ~C~ ~ C~~ 0 ~ ~ w ~ ~r r ~3"`""" ~ (,7 ~ J Z Q Y _s Q--- ~ C~ _ , ~Ma. q~ - Raj /.:Y ~ 26TH AVE ~ uY VICINITY MAP I ~ A P P L E W 0 0 D( K N O L L S 1 2~ H F I L i I I ZONED R-1 NTS PORTION OF TRACT 12 ~ I ~ ~z ~ ~ z~ w ( 54 Z W~ ~ 3 ~ 5436 ~ ~ -5436- ~ 3~ ,~."~l ~ ~ "d. ~ a BROOKSIDE SUBDIVISION I ~ SOT 1 I LOT 2 I LOT 3 ,4L.3 ~ LOT 4. .,,1 ~ ~ ~ ~ .s _ ~Cn- ~l ~o o~.L. ~a~ 0 APPLE WOOD KNOLLS 1 2TH FILING ~ , ~ ~o~ N"I ~ _ I m I ~ i - ~IIII,I,~ ~II~,~1'I'~~ ~ ~ ! 't~ S00'30 56 E • ~ 111  1 ~ f _ ~ ~ ! ~ Q ~P i I ~ ~w ~ I I ~ ~ ~ I ~ , ,r ~ 1 ! S r .y ~ 4. I II' / r ' 1 ~ C ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ i ' EXIS~T'ING ~ ~ ~ -i ~ ~ PORTION OF TRACT 1~2 J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ DETE~ITI N ~ ' ~ f ~ ~ ) _ ~ BROOKSIDE SUBDIVISION, ( ~ ~ ~ \ I 8' SANITARY SE1dfER ~ EA EMEN~~ ~ , ~ ~ . a~, ~ BK. X939, 408 ~ i',~~ ~ e ~ / ~/~'-ice ~ 1 ~ ,F`~. ~\1 i ~ \ NOTE;, SEW IIN~ NOT , ~a ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~~.~IN EASEMENfi~ N ~ ~ C _ t .fix' 1 ~P \ ~ it ~ ~ ~ _4 » _ ` 1 ~ i ~ :r _viu . r- 1 , 1 5442-'_ 5443-' ~ `f \ 1 - ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f 1 ~I \ p - 1 ` ~ ~ 4 tr- ~ 0.15 , . . ~ ` ~ i~i~ j ~ ~ ~ _ s_. 1 r ~ ~ \ ~ l ~ ~ ~,~~1 \,~1 1 i ~ R` ~ I 1 e PORTION OF TRACT 11 % ~ , ~ f \ i f-~; BROOKSIDE SUBDIVISION ~ I~~; v ~ f ZONED R-1 E~ N ~ ~ ~~~t~~~~~~~' ~ ~ ~ i ACCESS A~N~Q ~ ~ ~ ' ' '~f` , , ~ i ~v1AINTE~~PIA~E @ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ _ ~n pip 1,~~ REC!"~10. F02082~,~ ~ ~ li ~ ,c \ . . . i K S00'33~14j~E 1 i f~/ r ~i~~i ~j i~f~~ c~ w ~ i~ ~,~J ( µ 16.00 ~ ~ ~0~.1'~3'1~4"~ ~ ~~i~ ~ + ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ i `s 116 871'j F•r ,//if! ~ ~Q ~ i r ~ , ~ ~ coo t ~.~'`<~O~.~l(l ~~z.l ~ , ~ i~ ti ~ A_~ ~t L AN HAFACT B ~ I~ 't ~ \ 1~ 1~1~~~'~~`~~ / `o~ ~i' B Z SUBDIVISION ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ Ij ~ ~N. , \ ,I- \ ~ 1 i, fir. ~ i ZONED ~ITARY SEWER ~ ~ ~ ~~~;1~ i~~;~ii ~ j ~s• SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT \ ~ 1 ~~~~~il~ i;~i'i ` \ A~EMENT 1 t BK. 1616, PG. 158 ~ ~ ~ Y~ ~ ~~,~~1 ~~i,~,+ eK~, g64, PG. 580 / NOTE: SEWER LINE NOT (cn . ~ ~ly~,~ ~ ; IN EASEMENT ~---~)~;I;~~~~ii~~~~~ ~~~'rJ ' J' t. SOQ34~33"E ~ iii~~ ~1~~U~\~~WOJN r r i 16.00' ~ 'i ~'<<~ t ~ j~ S00°34 33 ~ ; `Q~8'1~~~4'~: ~ f j 1 v a j i K PORTION OF TRACT 10 J ~ ~ ~ ~ SOQ'34 33 E ~ BROOKSIDE SUBDIVISION. ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ 16.25 SANITARY SEWER  14- A N_ Ch! _ i ~ w 00 0 i ~1. a0 ZZ i i i i ~U i i 0 i i i i i i i 9002 `6£ 43Jew IGNp/SU : •.~yo~ 99-60 jagwnN }oa(oad d3SN iUl 3i 'E' y `'moo xe:j 886£'186'£0£ /0?u 06d° 086£'L86'£0£ 9M8 opeaoloo 'pooaea~e-j 1aaa1S Buildiy 0£6Z BuiRanmS puel pue 6uu99ul6U3 JjAIO w saueljnsuoO ~g paiudazd OPrJOIOJ `o ?Pi2I luauA1 anuany puz£ 'A1 SZZI I HDHfIHD ssTSdVg QooMIzddv (1011 Upped pue aanlangS pasodocd) poda-a o5putp.zQ ~.z~utu~ija.zd 9ooz'TE qz)jeW Podaa a5euieaa /ueuiwllaad q:)anq:)lspdeg pooMaiddy 89bLZ#'2['d opuzojo33o alulS zaaujSug juuojssojozd pazalsTSag 'Td `z puua J- Q CLUO •szaglo ,Cq pouSisop sallgjou3 oSmuzp Xuu ioj SIjliqujl oumssu IOU llugs puu IOU soop 02ptg IuagM 30 Y(l?0 agl lugl puulszapun I ;oazagl soi)zud olgisuodsod agI zo; upolpo juojugoaL put LiB.s aSuujuIQ uuolS a$P. d lBogAk jo XI!D agI 3o suoisjAoid agI Slim oouupzoom uj (uojsjAZadns loanp Xui zapun io) ouz Xq pazudazd sum alts gozng0 Isjldug poomaiddy oql ;o u2isap a3uuiuzp XzuuiLuilazd oql ioj (uuld) lzodaz sigl lugl (jllzao Xgazaq I -*I'VgHgsVJS s. ua9ATID ra •I 900Z 'i5 4J1eW L-d0dd2I 900 IIV2IQ 2I03 S?IOO.19 IVAO-dddd lzoda'd 96eu1eza AJuuiwllazd gozngD Isildeg pooMaIddy aa~aod ui uedd a6euiead b abed v xipuaddV £ abed S30N9'd3332d E abed SNOISn]DNOJ Z abed W31SAS 39VNInG 03dO13A34 03SOd02dd Z abed T abed W31SAS 39VNIV210 1VOI'dO SIH NoLonw'MI slualuoa jo aia-udZ 900Z'TE 4oaeW }jodaa 96eudea0 /ueudwilaad 4oan40 4sd4deg pooMalddV b3° 12Oed •a6p!'d TeagM Jo /4!D ayT Aq pap!nad seen uo!TewaoJu! auoz poOg s!ql 'S16T 'ZT I!ady aTep sjaau!6u3 u!lg6nejoW-Tg6!aM Aq go!nE) eual aol ApnTs TouTs!4 loaTuoo p0013 pue a6eu!eJ4 uegjp ayT oT bu!pjoooe papidap we s1pil auoz poold (T .tOn1S39b'NIV89GAIt G&VZbH00073 •a •sap!poej gamga aq !legs asn pue1 pasodoid aql (Z •6u!pl!nq uo!Teonpa ue pue'Tol 6u!~aed'sa!a!lpe; uolTuaTap pajmbai To uo!Tonjjsuoo '6u!pea6 TolJano JOT uopeneoxa ;o sTs!suoo ToaCoad agl (T NOLdIYJS301J3108d 03SOd0?Id D •Aquadoid ayT To jleq gTuou agT gbnoaga goln!) eua-l OTUI A!aaTsaMgTJOU sMOiT /ue;nquT jou!w y 'ATaadoad aqT jo lied uaagTaou ayT g6nagT Ap4seaq)pou sMold going eua-l •au!l AT,adoid TsaM ayT 6uole bu!uuna ad!d a6eu!eap waoTs dWO aa;awe!p you!-9£ pue gou!-bZ y •Tol 6u!jaed TsaM agT To you eaae puod uopaTap y :To Ts!suoo sa!T!poeT a6eu!eap 6ups!x3 (y •AeMa6eu!eja Ao[eW going eua-! ayT u!gT!M sail aT!s aqT To pua Lpou agl (S Uo11e4a6an lein4eu jo Aluewud sTs!suoo aT!s aqT To eaae 6u!u!ewa~ agl •a4p ayT ;o sane 99•Z AlaTew!xoadde sJanoo '6u!~aed paTeposse pue 'Tuud;ooT 6u!pl!nq uolTeonpa dS S6Z8 6u!Ts!xa uy (Z •paaap!suoo aq !lp 'saaoy 9.9 Ala;ew!xoadde 'Tol 6upljed paTeposse pue 6u!p!!nq uo!Teonpa Mau a 10 uo!T!ppe ayT aoi paganTs!p aq oT eaje ayT Aluo 'Taodaj s!gT jo sasodmd aqT ao3 •saaoe L9,K Jo eaae ue 3o sgs!suoo alp IeToT aql (T NOlldl21JS3031I5 •9 6u!l!d 44ZT s!lou)l pooMalddy ayT oT Tuaoe[pe st aT!s agl (Z •gZ uo!TOaS 3O %MN aq4 'ue!p!aaW ledpu!ad u,9 ayT To TsaM 69 a6ueb g4noS C d!gsumol ui paTeool 6u!aq se paquosap aagTanj sl aT!s aql •uosaa}}a(' 3o /qunoo 'abp!b TeagM To /,I!:) 'TaaaTs !lend pue 4aal4s sww!S uaaMTaq anuany puZ£ TsaM jo ap!s g3pu uo paTeool s! @q!s aql (T NOLV3072US 'b' NOI1.91700,YLNI "I 90OZ'TS goaeW Taodaa a6eu!eap Aaeu!w!laad gomgo Ts!Tdeq pooMalddy b 3o Z 32u j •wa04s ao[ew ay; Aoj Aouanbajj AA-001 a pup waoas Aouiw ay; Aoj /ouanbaal AA-s a 6uisn pauiwaa4ap wam sawnloA uoiaua4ap pwinbw pup smog dead wao4s ubisa4 (9 •Z awnlOA'camcin 'a6pjoaS ui epa4ln ayT gaim aouepaoooe ui pauiwaa4ap aaam sa4ea asealai wnwixew pup sawnJOA uoiTua4ap pajinba.i wnwiuiW •saaoe ST uegj ssal si /gaadoid aoafgns aq4 aouis eiaaauo pe;uiea auiwialap oa papalas sem pog4aW leuoijeb aql (S •Iaoaed yomgo aq4 }o uoi:Pod uaayWou ay4 poi paiels 4uawdolanap lei;uapisaa pasodoad ay; Aq pauielap aq pim paaeaaua6 smog aqq pup azis ui sane £9.0 AlaTewixadde si eaje sigl •seaae padeospuel awos pup sauawanoadwi Ae/N-jo-4g6id aaaa;S ggod pasodoad jo s1sisuoo,g, uiseg (y (saJue TS•0) •auil AWadoid asea aqj o} eaae padeospuel 6uiasixa pagan4sipun pup 'seaae padeospuel pasodoad go s4sisuoo TNn, uise9 (saaoe TT•9) •6uiplinq uoiTeonpa pasodoad aqa pue'eaae Tot 6ui~aed pasodoad aq4 jo pe 'puod uoguaTap pasodoad ay; sapnloui,V, UISeg (Z •4seaywou/LWou pup gsea aqa o; pauielapun aTisyo mog „TNn„ wseg •,g, uiseg aoJ uieaap oT uoiIua;ap a4is-uo apinad asnw laoaed s,goango ay; jo uoiTaod q)aou ayj uo auawdolanap leiauapisaa pasodoad aql •ueld sigl Aq pasodoad aou si uiseg siga aoj uollualap pup uoisua:xa aaaa;s ggod ao; AeM-jo-4g6ib pasodoad ay; si g, uiseg •alis uo paweaap st „y„ uiseg •suiseq-qns £ o;ui papinip si a}is ayl (T b'R131RL3 •b' W31SAS39VNIVYa a3dOMAffa a3SOdO2/d •Aemabeuiead young eual ay; oTui smog ails aapua aga woa; a6euieao viseq auo ApeouoTsiq si aais aql (T NOUdRO530 NISb'9-917S V •a~is ay; jo pua q:aou aq4 gbnagT Alaa4seaq:pou smog yoiym'Aema6euieap leool lean4eu a si 'young euaq 'uiseg ao(eW agl •uoisinia 6uiuueld aql Aq paugap se sasn pue pauueid pup soPsua}oeaeyo a6euieap uiseg ao[eW (Z •((igd)Ron);oiaasi(i iaTuog poou )9 abeuieap uegan 'sdeW a6euiea4 uo jenueW ay4 ui paquosap We Sopsiaapeaego uiseg Aema6euiea4 aoCeW young eual aya oT AaoTnquTuoo si a;is ayl (T NISb'9 YO[b'N 3 TI 1491SAS 396' AT M9 7VOIYO1SIH 900Z'TE goaeW soda,d a6euiead Aaeuiwilaad yoango Tsiadeg poomaiddy b3o £ aged 7002 POMP & 'sjaau1,6u3 m1y6ne7oW- ileum (q paaedajd ' 1_1451p 7oa;uoo pool4 pue a6emejp uegan ~enue{y eu540 a euieap uuo;•q uegan g •a6pib;eayM ~o ~7.<7 s;uauia{m ab a euieup a;is • y SgONflNgJaN *Al •golno eual 4TlM pa;eloosse auoz paeze4 poolT agT ul pasodoJd sTuawanoJdwi ou aue aaagl (T 3102 G8VZ 'H 00073 NI SV38V •TJodaa sly; ul uMogs se ,e, ulseg oT saUllloeT uolTuaTap aplnoJd oT paJlnbaJ aq plM laoaed goango a44 To uolTJod 4TJou a44 To Tuawdolanap lelTuaplsaJ pasodoJd agl ,y, ulsee woJT-Tour w Ojs a4T wnTdeo oT Tol buiJjed pasodoJd a44 To pua 4TJou agT Te pasodoJd we sTalul uleap wAoTS sgjdap algernolle Molaq Jo Te paweTulew aq IIIM smolT wJoTs ToI 5UNed •sawnlon a6eao4s paJlnbaJ wnwlulw aqT Taaw o; pazls seM puod uolTuaTap pasodoJd agl (Z •Tol 6uplied pue 6ulpllnq Mau a41 gTIM paTeloosse seaJe snolnaadwl Ieuoplppe a4a woJT 6ulTlnsaJ }Tour paseanul aqT aoueleq of sal]IlpeT aTenbape aplnowd IIIM STuauJanoaduJl a6euleJp pasodoJd agl (T SLV3N3A0YdG✓I3010b'db✓l "b' SN0151773NOO 7H •Tol buhlJed pasodoJd a4a To pua you a4a Te paTeool puod uolTuaTap pasodoJd a4a Aq paoeldaJ aq lllM pue '101 6ul~Jed pasodad agT To uoipnJTsuoo agT aaTTe Tslxa Tou IIIM 'Tol bul~Jed Tlegdse TsaM a4T To pua gjAOU a44 le paTeool 'puod uopuaTap 6ulTslxa a41 •deJ-du 44lM pazlpggs aq plM eaJe slyT a6essed JaTeM wJOTs ssaoxa JoT JIaM MolTJano /oua6Jawa ue apnpu! IIIM puod uoTuaTap a41 •going euap oTul sa6Jegoslp golgM'puod aqT To q:pou alerts a6euleap 6ulTSlxa a44 oT pa/,anuoo pue 'puod uolTuaTap pasodoJd aqT w ampnJTs aalTno agT /,q palloJauoo aq IIIM grog sp 9Z"b sl wJoas (JA-ooT) Jo[ew a44 JoT pue sp 96"0 sl wJOTs (JA-S) lelalul agT JoT sulseq padolanap agT JoT aTeJ asealaJ wnwlxew paTsn[pe au (Z •awnlon Taal o!gno 6Z9'9E AIaTewlxoJdde sl y, ulseg padolanap agT JOT (ACNW) awnlon uolTuaTap paJlnbaJ wnwlulw a4J- (T NOIIN3L-70 'J •salTJadoJd Tuaoe[pe uodn Toedwl asJanpe AUe ane4 oT p gedpque Tou ale pa4eJaua6 sMolT agT pue pauleTapun aT!sTTo sMOld ,TNn, sulseq (Z '4olnE) eua-l oTul asealaJ IOJTUOJ IIIM go14M 'ainpni4s Tapno asealaJ papoJTuoo e ane4 IIIM puod uolTuaTap pasodoJd aql •Tol 6ul~Jed pasodoJd a44 To pua 4TJou a4T oT Tuaoe[pe paTeool puod uol;ua;ap pasodoJd a4T o;ul sMoU y, ulsee (T 9ooZ'T£ 40JeW 330N17Y 9 TJoda,d a6euleJa /ueulwllaJd gom4o Tsl;deg poomalddy b3a 4 e2ed V xipuaddV 900Z 'T£ piew :Podaa a6eweao /ueuiwllaad y:)myo 4si;deg poomalddy 4V a6ed yoan40 isildes poomelddv - - OOS'0 068"0 OE6'0 006'0 005'0~~~ 06T O 0050 0680 0£6'0 OE6'0 1 006'0____ _ -1 ' bE8'0 - ' - 006 0 9E8 0 V ..J.. v=Itiv ..i.. v:jzly ..0.. 1.0.. O,. NISV8 (33dVOSONV'7 31321ONOO V321v 03AVd V3NV dooN 031HOGM -S1N3101dd30O,.0.. 031HS13M 21A-004 31VIf1OIvo 4'0 054'0 OL8'0 OL= 088'0 8'0 _ 058'0 058'0 - loS6'0 14ZL'0 - - - 4Nf1 9 0540 . OL C 088 0 _ ..0., v321v D. V3NV ..0., 1101. 1,0.. NISVS 03dV3SONVI 31321ONOO V3HV 03AVd v3Nv 4002! a31HE)19M -S1N3101dd30O..0.. 031HOGM NA-9 31vino-lV0 %6'ZL Z163 £6b'0 6ZE'b 479'0 SSZ'L SV32iV ~V101 %0'0 b450 000'0 000'0 000'0 b45'0 6Nfl %E'8L LE4'0 4b0'0 ZSb'0 000'0 OE9'0 g %5'8L Z9Z'4 Z5b'0 LLS"£ 4Z5'0 444'9 _ V k 6.0 dWl% (ov) V321V (av) v321v (ov) (oV) (ov) NISVS 03dVOSUNVI 319MONOO V98V 03AVd V38V 400N V321V IV101 NOIln8R11S10 VMV NISVG 050 68.0 £6'0 06'0 NA-004 5Z"0 88"0 06"0 06'0 UA-OL 54'0 L9'0 88'o 58'0 JA-S 03dVOS0NV'l 313HONOD 03AVd 03d002i S1N3101c1=1300 OUVONVIS (son(en-0) sluaioi}}ao0 }}ouna .1o} suoile(nole0 COHAW IVNOIIVU b 3I8b1 D a a 0 n co v a N_ O s C 0 N cc N D N m C O Z W D co z O Z N C) c 0 0 o g W 2n 07 W W 0 A 0) D cn o o rn >D z , m y o , v A D CO (O A - D N N A fJ 0 n o N ~ N A ~ p w w l o o D r CD O A o 0 o < c i O N 0 7 0 C a _ a W N CD o _-4 rt 3 O O O A N 'h ~o ~n co r m z 0) w o V 2 0 Ui Ct) r O W m w ' ~ I! < DD C r m CA O m N N OD cn O O mm Cl) N z CA cn c n 0 0 0 o o ~ O X~ Xr cm z W O In 0 m z ~ m - a) D CA zO z N C O O O O ' " W D - W o O rn > D z an, ; v A A N i - D f0 CO ? O N a O I N O v V N A D W rn ~j r m O A V o m o < cn O 3 (n 0 0 rt W N m ~ - 0 O A N h co r m z o ~ 2 c ii Cl) r O ca m w ' « < D < M m w o r 0 c N N ~ m co c m o 0 Cl) a,c n Nn Z 0 0 0 o o ~ Vt ~D C r- zM 0n N -n o v 0 c0i ~ D c a ~ a 00 A W ill -o N c 7 O D r O v O O £V abed gojng0lslldeg pooMaiddV p g Z sapey wad . Z9Z'4 L46'0 IV-L01 £9£'Z 84£'0 Mn - SZ9'9 SZ£'I - y (S3D) oolo (SID) So S31VN 3Sb'3l3M Wnwixvw a3lSflf av L 312VI vlseq pau!elapun padolanap 10 smog read Rq paonpaj aq of aleb asealab elgeMollV el!S lelol asealaa algeanolIV wnwlxeW palsnfpV 949'9 SZ£'4 SZ9'9 1V101 4450 1 WO u 4490 444'9 ZZZ'4 444'9 I V (SID) oota~ (SID) sad (savoy) y NlSdaanS ft) S3-LVM 3S`d313H WnWIXVW 9 31OVi V.0' 4=oma0 VZ'0=570 ('at)) asealaa elgemollV wnwlxelgl ao; suollenb3 _oo:o____ oo'o 00 o I 6Nn 88'SZ4S4 49'9648 ! 4£'6Z99£ ! V 1£;;) A~bM o"A N(sveans ADOM+00 t AObM V.Z' 4.(Z VAObM) = A00M 0 .8L'0 + ZI.6C 4 - el . 46'0)= AobM NEJIS30 NISV9 NOI-LN3130 030N3-LX3 „sdWB IeanlonjlS„ -IOA 'lenueW epalup abeuleia wiolS OOdan (ADOM) 3Wn-IOA aNn1dVO Ainvnt) N31b'M 9 3181'!1 00'0 00'0 449'0 %0'0 Mn 4£'6Z99£ Z4'48£SL 444'9 V - Q:4 b,aot oo~A (EU VN=SA (Sa-13V) V I NlsvssnS Aaaw 006/(95'£ -zIZ00'0 - 1.8L'0=om.N V°01N=00[A 0004/(99'Z-I.LL'0)=SN VsN=SA u!seggnS;o eajV =V (Moleq paugap) luelsuop uo0ualaa=!H (L algel aes) ssausno!Aiedwi ulseg padolanap=j alab esea!ab a!geMollV wnwlxeW='0 leaf o!gno ul awnloA uo!luelaa pannbea=!A (AaNw) 3wn,10A NOI1N3130 03Nint)3N wnWINIW v 3-levi a 10I2i1Si0 io~iN03 OOOl3 00 35VNIM NVOan 06-I-11 snoLAUadm6 luaoaad jo3 I-Z ajn613 aas.x SULseq a6.aeL +o} pLLeA aq lou Aew sluatOt33a03 eLnwao3 LeuoLleb asa4i :310N OS' 9Z' Si' SO' 0. LLoS 5FeL3 ` SUMel OZ' 90' IO' 00' 0 LLos pups ' suMel 06' 06' S8' 08' 06 : s3ood 68' 88' L8" 18' 96 :s LpM Pue aALJO 09' 09' Sb' Ob' 0b (Pa)apd) LaneJ0 E6' 06' 88' L8' 001 paned S9' SS' Lb' EV ("SUMe I„ aas) Sb' SE' SZ' OZ' OL' 09' OS' St* OS' OE' OZ' Si' Sb' SZ' 8I' Oi' 06' 98' 08 08' Z8' 91' ZL' IL' 08' OZ' OZ' S9' 09' ob' SE' 0£' 08' r OL' S9' 09' OL' 09' OS' Sb' 09' OS' Sb' 0b' 08' OL' S9' 09' 68' 88' L8' L8' 001 Oi S AON3n63d3 : slaajls (pauLiap lou asn pueL uagM) Sb sLsALeuV Mo13 alLsddO Le.AnlLnoLa6V `sltaquaa.ag Z -sLsFLeuV Mot3 OLJOISLH :spajv pa OLanapun oz seaaV PjPA ppo [L eb OS :SLOOqDs Ei :spunoa eLd L :saLaplawa3 's).aed 06 saJD GPOH 08 seaaV lg6Ll" :LeLulsnpul oz sluawl.apdV .aa6.aeq .40 401 a,aoV Z/i OL (PND211e) ldun-L4PW OS (PagoplaP) ltun-L1LnW kLiwe3-aL6uLS :LeLluaptsad OL seaaV P00g.aogg6tapi S6 seaaV LeLOjawwo0 :ssauLsng z Sn0IA83dWI S3I1SI2313VdVH3 33V32InS 1N3D23d 20 3Sn ONVI Sn0IAb3dWI 1N3383d ONV S1N3I3I33303 330P4n2- 03ON3WWO338 (ZV) I-£ 318V1 33014nd i nNVW VI831I D 39VNIVH • i I Ol~OS: 3ON3a3d3a ggg :Aa t AON :at' ; (calnulw) 'NOI.LV81N3ONOO JO 3WI1 aO Nouv8na Wao1S 09 09 04 OE oz Ot 0 0 L" I 1 . i f I .I. 1 fak-fi t O*Z I - - : - 1 ' OT m 0.9 m CD O*L tos aan~ld VII13-LI80 lb:DtNHC)3.L CNV NJIS3a 3JVNIV8(3 W801S LEGEND RVI IAN Nv►, PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT LINE ---5425--- EXISITNG GRADE CONTOUR J ~ r 5425 FINISH GRADE CONTOUR ~ ~ ~ ~ DRAINAGE BASIN BOUNDARY C~ 1 D BASIN DESIGNATION Ca RUNOFF AL 1 " A COEFFICIENT D o.~s ~ 44TH AVE BASIN AREA 3'~ 0.87 o ACRES C goo RUNOFF COEFFICIENT a ~ CLEAR CREEK 0 38TH AVE v~i c~ z r._. ~ SITE J a ~ Y ~ 32ND AVE 0 J W N W L~ ~ N J is ~ Z Q ~r PORTION OF TRACT 12 ~ ~ BROOKSIDE SUBDIVISION I ~ a ~ ~ w . ~o° ~a r ~ ~ 26TH AVE = N ICY FNS ~A I m ( ~ FND 5/8" REBAR VICINITY MAP WIA~.U CAP I ~ i /ALUM. CAP w ~~~`3Q'" LANE ENGR. LS 438 NTS ` . Q E 4 • ®ws 1 ~ ~ • ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ,1 aP I1`~T flF BE~INNI~I Cl~ i~  f 1 1 " 1 I■ I / _rr. " } T i 1rI i l 0 l l 3 ~ 1 ~ I Y f■ - ~ ~ rt~H~ ~ i~ ~,~rr f ~ f ~ ~ ~ r' f ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ 1/ 1 m f 1 1 1 ~ t 1 ~ ~ 1 + ~ ~ r ~ ~ti_. `w _ 3 eta ~ fi f 1 ~ ~ I l f ~ N 1 r ~ 1 f ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r i i 1 I`~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ 1"7 `.a~ o ! ~ 1 s ~ ~ ~ ~ t W ! ~ M a ti ~ 1 9 1 1 ~r 1 _ e~ CY_ , M .~t ~ ~ ~ Wit. ~ N _ 1 ~ 4 ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 W t ~ , ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t 1 ~ ~ i 1 ~y.~ 1 1 ~ P ~ _ 1 , ~ t r~ a ~ ~ I I ~ ~ 1 ! 1 H ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ 5?` 1 ~ ~f P ~ ~ d 1 ~ C~ W N p ` 1 ~ t 1 W 1 ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 Q 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ! t OC) ~ i , ~ I ~ ~ I ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ t PPP t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ! ~ + { 1 ~ t~ P ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 r ~ ~ 1 ~ w ~ ~ _J_~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r e~p~ ~ ~ 1 ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 ~ 1 i ! 1 1 t ~ 1 t ti ~ i 1 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ o 1 =d ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ 1 f 4 ! 1 1 ~ 1 ti~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~y ~ ~ ~ i ~ 1 ~ 1 1 ~ ! g t ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ w ! r 1 k ~ 1 ~ 1 4 ~ ~ r \ 1 P f r <'r 1 0 ~ e, ♦ ~ t 1 ~ / f~ 1 1 1 C 1 ~ 1 J .t ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~0 it ~ ~ f 1 ~ ~ f / s f - 'Z . s. ~ 1 k 1 f o ~ ~ I~ , i 1 /i 1 ! i f , I 1 Wis. i ,..f \ 1I 1 r r 1 ~ ~ t 1 a a ~ ~ f I i 1 1~ ~ 4 ` ~ ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ 4 f i ~ > ri . ✓ ~ \ ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ j _ ~ f f ~I~ r ~ ! f ~ l ~f 4 1 f i E~ 'v ~ f I I i f t! it t i f CP ~ ~ ~ t t1 i i , f ~ ! J A ~ t r ~ ~ I ~'f ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ 1 l~ 1 t /r ~ ~ ~ 1 f ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~r ~ i t f f J L. ~ l 1 ~ ~ ~ s 1 ~ r ~ c~ ll ~ + 1 r ~ ft ~ _i ~ k f a f k ~ f P ~ fl ~ I t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 ~ ~ tx t- t1C1 1 ~ 1 ~ 11 ~ W Z t!1 ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ \ 1 1 11 s W ~ ~ / W l 1 i 1 ~f ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~'V ~ ~ ~ \ ~ P i ti~ o ~ e ~ ~ tS` ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ r • ~ 1 l~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ Q ~ 1 ~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ co ~ \ M . a ~ ►y t ~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 1 1 Y ~ ! 1 M ~ I li ~ il! ! ~1 / m 1 1 ~ l til e 1 I! cp ` 141 i ` ! 11! 1 II ~ 1 ! ~i w < IP 11 1 ~ ICI if ~ P r„ 1 i 11 f !!f I ~1 ~ I ~ 1 IPI ~1 t ! 111 t ~ ~ ~ 1!f 11 ~ t 1 ~1 it _ _ ~ 1 I I i~ ! 1 , t.. ..,.1., ~ l ff ,'r f / \~1 .,j? w~,... \ \ \ ~ e s 1 1~~'j~S~ .ter rrw~wwr ~o ri ~ w ~ ~ ~r~w .w aw I r, ti ~ ~ ~ 11 \ ~ i ~ ~ P ~ ~ ~ \ ~ 7..tr r ~ ~ ~ 1 \ \ ,,e~1 f ~ ~ ~ ~ U IVI I f ~ ~ ~ ~R`~ I T _ 'i 4r ~ ~ :s f ~ ~ 1 ► 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ I Sµ ~ i F S , i P \i  i i SCALE: Hor. 1" 5V i ~ vort. I i i i i i ~ i i ~ i i i i i ~ i i ~ ----------iT------ r~ r