The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About6400 W 46th Avenuei CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 235-2855 Office INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: R O F Job Address: 6-1100 11(1/ 0 A Ve_ Permit Number: Ze9a049 0 ❑ No one available for inspection: Time /0 • - A PM Re -Inspection required: Ye No When corrections have been made, schedule for re -inspection online at: http ✓/www. ci. wheatridge. co. uslinspection f 46-'O Date: feInspector: ` DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type:" Job Address: Permit Number: ❑ No one available for inspection: Time '. AM/PM Re -Inspection required: Yes No When corrections have been made, call forre-inspectionat 303-234-5933 Date:e=: ! Inspector: r ) DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office ® (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: - Job Address: V`' Permit Number: _�Xpc� �) 613 �j L" -w !..-11, r r- v Ctrs U N P ❑ No one available for inspection: Time Re -Inspection required: (Yes No When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933 Date: S' D � ' D� t- Inspector: by s DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE _A Building Inspection Division r/ (303) 235-2855 Office INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: xn-� -% Job Address: V r1 k_ Permit Number: ac c--\ , „l Q ❑ No one available for inspection: Time `" AM/PM Re -Inspection required: Yes No When corrections have been made, schedule for re -inspection online at: httpYlwww. ci. wheatridge. co. uslinspection Date:L Inspector.— DO nspector DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE City of Wheat Ridge Residential Roofing PERMIT - 202000663 PERMIT NO: 202000663 ISSUED: 04/07/2020 JOB ADDRESS: 6400 W 46th Ave EXPIRES: 04/07/2021 JOB DESCRIPTION: Tear off tar and gravel, install 4 in. poly insulation, 1/4 dens deck and reroof with Certainteed Flintastik; 1/12 pitch; 15 squares *** CONTACTS *** OWNER (303)503-7042 REDOSH DOUGLAS J SUB (303)466-0161 BERNIE REITZ 019543 REITZ ROOFING, INC. *** PARCEL INFO *** ZONE CODE: UA / Unassigned USE: UA / Unassigned SUBDIVISION CODE: 2405 / BARTHS, COULEHAN GRANGE, WHEAT BLOCK/LOT#: 0 / *** FEE SUMMARY *** ESTIMATED PROJECT VALUATION: 10,000.00 FEES Total Valuation 0.00 Use Tax 210.00 Permit Fee 204.30 ** TOTAL ** 414.30 *** COMMENTS *** *** CONDITIONS *** ALL PITCHED ROOFS REQUIRE A MIDROOF INSPECTION REGARDLESS OF PITCH. FOR ROOF PITCH 6/12 AND OVER: Midroof & Final Roof inspections for ROOFS with 6/12 PITCH & OVER REQUIRE A 3RD PARTY INSPECTION. The 3rd party inspection report must be dropped off to the Permit Desk at the City of Wheat Ridge. The report MUST BE SIGNED by the Homeowner. REGARDING ROOF VENTILATION: Roof ventilation shall comply with Building Division Policy BD -18-001 for Balanced Ventilation Systems, or manufacturer installation instructions, whichever is more stringent. MIDROOF & SHEATHING: Effective December 1, 2014, asphalt shingle installations require an approved mid -roof inspection, conducted when 25-750 of the roof covering is installed, prior to final approval. Installation of roof sheathing (new or overlay) is required on the entire roof when spaced or board sheathing with ANY gap exceeding one half inch exists. Sheathing and mid -roofs may be called in at the same time, one hundred percent of the sheathing must be complete and 25-750 of the mid -roof may be complete. Asphalt shingles are required to be fastened to the roof deck with a minimum of 6 nails per shingle. Ice and water shield is required. Eave and rake metal is required. LADDER MUST BE SET FOR ALL ROOF INSPECTIONS: A ladder extending 3 feet above the roof eave and secured in place is required to be provided for all roof inspections. COMMERCIAL ROOFS: In order to pass a final inspection of elastomeric or similar type roof coverings, a letter of inspection and approval from the manufacturer technical representative stating that "the application of the roof at (project address) has been applied in accordance with the installation instruction for (roof material brand name) roof covering" is required to be on site at the time of final inspection. I, by my signature, do hereby attest that the work to be performed shall comply with all accompanying approved plans and specifications, applicable building codes, and all applicable municipal codes, policies and procedures, and that I am the legal owner or have been authorized by the legal owner of the property and am authorized to obtain this permit and perform the work described and approved in conjunction with thispermit. I further attest that I am legally authorized to include all entities named within this document as parties to the work to be performed and that all work to be performed is disclosed in this document and/or its' accompanying approved plans and specifications. Signature of OWNER or CONTRACTOR (Circle one) Date 1. This permit was issued based on the information provided in the permit application and accompanying plans and specifications and is subject to the compliance with those documents, and all applicable statutes, ordinances, regulations, policies and procedures. 2. This permit shall expire 365 days after the date of issuance regardless of activity. Requests for extension must be made in writing and received prior to the date of expiration. An extension of no more than 180 days made be granted at the discretion of the Chief Building Official and may be subject to a fee equal to one-half of the originalpermit fee. 3. If this permit expires, a new permit may be required to be obtained. Issuance of a new permit shall be subject to the standard requirements, fees androcedures for approval of any new permit. Re -issuance or extension of expired permits is at the sole discretion of the Chief Building Official and is not guaranteed. 4. No work of any manner shall be performed that shall results in a changeof the natural flow of water without prior and specific approval. 5. The permit holder shall notify the Building and Inspection Services Division in accordance with established policy of all required inspections and shall not proceed or conceal work without written approval of such work from the Building and Inspection Services Division. 6. The issuance goWnting of a p it shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any provision of any applicable ire_vany r regulation of this jurisdiction. Approval of work is subject to ield inspection. Signature of Chief Building Official Date REQUESTS MUST BE MADE BY 11:59PM ANY BUSINESS DAY FOR INSPECTION THE FOLLOWING BUSINESS DAY. City of Wheat Ridge Residential Roofing PERMIT - 202000663 PERMIT NO: 202000663 ISSUED: 04/07/2020 JOB ADDRESS: 6400 W 46th Ave EXPIRES: 04/07/2021 JOB DESCRIPTION: Tear off tar and gravel, install 4 in. poly insulation, 1/4 dens deck and reroof with Certainteed Flintastik; 1/12 pitch; 15 squares I, by my signature, do hereby attest that the work to be performed shall comply with all accompanying approved plans and specifications, applicable building codes, and all applicable municipal codes, policies and procedures, and that I am the legal owner or have been authorized by the legal owner of the property and am authorized to obtain this permit and perform the work described and approved in conjunction with thispermit. I further attest that I am legally authorized to include all entities named within this document as parties to the work to be performed and that all work to be performed is disclosed in this document and/or its' accompanying approved plans and specifications. Signature of OWNER or CONTRACTOR (Circle one) Date 1. This permit was issued based on the information provided in the permit application and accompanying plans and specifications and is subject to the compliance with those documents, and all applicable statutes, ordinances, regulations, policies and procedures. 2. This permit shall expire 365 days after the date of issuance regardless of activity. Requests for extension must be made in writing and received prior to the date of expiration. An extension of no more than 180 days made be granted at the discretion of the Chief Building Official and may be subject to a fee equal to one-half of the originalpermit fee. 3. If this permit expires, a new permit may be required to be obtained. Issuance of a new permit shall be subject to the standard requirements, fees androcedures for approval of any new permit. Re -issuance or extension of expired permits is at the sole discretion of the Chief Building Official and is not guaranteed. 4. No work of any manner shall be performed that shall results in a changeof the natural flow of water without prior and specific approval. 5. The permit holder shall notify the Building and Inspection Services Division in accordance with established policy of all required inspections and shall not proceed or conceal work without written approval of such work from the Building and Inspection Services Division. 6. The issuance goWnting of a p it shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any provision of any applicable ire_vany r regulation of this jurisdiction. Approval of work is subject to ield inspection. Signature of Chief Building Official Date REQUESTS MUST BE MADE BY 11:59PM ANY BUSINESS DAY FOR INSPECTION THE FOLLOWING BUSINESS DAY. City C08B O8:V� tar and gra Tear off ..-- �4.3u ~~-- W �� 46th Ave �� 202N APPL/PERMlT Mot ~_ AMOUNT pAyM[NT RECEI0V 414.310 PP / 4795 AUTH COD[: ?354Q393 41q,3O ----------- Kimberly Cook From: no-reply@ci.wheatridge.co.us Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 11:18 AM To: CommDev Permits Subject: Online Form Submittal: Roofing Permit Application Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Categories: Kim Roofing Permit Application THIS APPLICATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A PERMIT. DO NOT BEGIN REROOFING UNTIL PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED. PROPERTY INFORMATION Property Address 6400 W. 46th Ave. Property Owner Name Doug Redosh Property Owner Phone 303-503-7042 Number (enter WITH dashes, eg 303-123-4567) Property Owner Email kdb714@gmail.com Address Do you have a signed Yes contract to reroof this property? CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Contractor Business Reitz Roofing, Inc. Name Contractor's License 019543 Number Contractor Phone 303-466-0161 Number (enter WITH dashes, eg 303-123-4567) Contractor Email Address reitzroofinginc@gmail.com 1 Retype Contractor Email Address Attach City of Wheat Ridge Electronic Payment Form - **DO NOT ATTACH A PICTURE OF A CREDIT CARD** DESCRIPTION OF WORK TOTAL SQUARES of the entire scope of work: Project Value (contract value or cost of ALL materials and labor) Are you re -decking the roof? Is the permit for a flat roof, pitched roof, or both? (check all that apply) What is the pitch of the FLAT roof? How many squares are part of the FLAT roof? Describe the roofing material for the FLAT roof: Type of material for the FLAT roof- reitzroofinginc@gmaiI.com 6400 W. 46th Ave.. pd 15 10,00.00 No Flat roof (less than 2:12 pitch) 1:12 15 Certainteed Flintastic Other (specify below) If "Other" is selected Single Ply Modified Bitumen above, describe here: Provide any additional Tearing off tar and gravel, installing 4" Poly Insulation, 1/4 detail here on the Dens Deck and reroofing with Certainteed Flintastik description of work. (Is this for a house or garage? Etc) SIGNATURE OF UNDERSTANDING AND AGREEMENT 01 I assume full Yes responsibility for compliance with applicable City of Wheat Ridge codes and ordinances for work under any permit issued based on this application. I understand that this Yes application is NOT a permit. I understand I will be contacted by the City to pay for and pick up the permit for this property. I understand that work Yes may not begin on this property until a permit has been issued and posted on the property. I certify that I have been Yes authorized by the legal owner of the property to submit this application and to perform the work described above. I attest that everything Yes stated in this application is true and correct and that falsifying information in this application is an act of fraud and may be punishable by fine, imprisonment, or both. Person Applying for Bernard Reitz Permit Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser. 3 ♦ i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division r (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax IN/{S~PEC~TION NOTICE Inspection Type: 1 i I 1 3 Job Address: , ( t Permit Number: S` ~ ; ❑ No one available for inspection: Time AM/PM Re-Inspection required: Yes No *When corrections have been made, ca f r re-i ,ection at 303-234-5933 Date: U Inspector:1 DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE ~ XcelEnerqy-- ++~y~ OIY.IONN OR COUNIY ROOR PVt N0. MOft ~ H .1 t J ~ E (p , ACTION TAKEN ❑ NO SHUT OFF ❑ APPLIANCE OFF sr~Fr ❑ BO'fH APPL 8 MEfER OFF OWNER TENANT ❑ AGENT ❑ OTHER ❑ ❑ METER SHUT OFF - WARNING - AS SHOMMJ BFLW14 IS NOf IN COMPILWCE WfIH 0.1RRQJRY ACCEPIID PRK.l1CE5 /1ND FROCEWRES M1D 1HE CONDI110N FOUND , COUID QtFAE A IWUU2D. CORRECl10N5 SFIOUID BE MI1DE 6Y A QIYUJFlEA CONIRFCIOR CONfPLf 10UR IDCAL BUIIDING DEPART- MBJf FOR dDDE lWD PERMR REQUIREMENIS PRIOR 70 PERFORMING REPVR WIXtK . Nua[ [aanvunrvce Y ~ CON ONIDB RREREO' ,ti,.. ..4.3 1 1 ^ + ~ . OO ~ FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, ON mccEO er nra¢ p °"n /OCCUFANTSIGNRTIRE - ER NSIOM iIME 1E ~ f f~ ~ l~r~ f . AI t - ~ ME REIA ONSHIPOGOCQIPTMTO I 7500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 W/tC[[t Telephone 303/235-2846 Ridge FAX 303/235-2857 August 6, 2004 Joe Stout 6400 West 46th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Deaz Mr. Stout: RE: Case No. WA-04-06 Please be advised that at its meeting on July 22, 2004, the Boazd of Adjustment DENIED your request for a 23 1/2 foot side yazd setback variance from the 30 foot side yazd setback requirement when adjacent to a public street resulting in a 6 1/2 foot side yazd setback for property zoned Residential-Two (R-2) and located at 6400 West 46th Avenue for the following reasons: A significant hazdship has not been established. Other conforming arrangements aze available to the applicant. Enclosed is a copy of the Certificate of Resolution, as well as a drafr copy of the minutes, stating the Boazd's decision. Should you decide to appeal the decision of the Boazd, you will need to notify the Jefferson County district court in writing within 30 days of the Boazd's decision. Please feel free to contact me at (303) 235-2846 if you have any questions. Sincerely, K-~-~0 Administrative Assistant Enclosures: Certificate of Resolution Draft of Minutes cc: WA-04-06 (case file) Building File \krvci-eng-001 \userslkfield\Ka[hy\BOA\CORRESP\2004\wa0406denial.wpd CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTION 0 R I G I N A L I, Ann Lazzeri, Secretary to the City of Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment, do hereby certify that the following Resolution was duly adopted in the City of Wheat Ridge, Counry of Jefferson, State of Colorado, on the 22nd day of Julv 2004• CASE NO: WA-04-06 APPLICANT'S NAME: Joe Stout LOCATION: 6400 West 46'" Avenue WHEREAS, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and WHEREAS, Boazd of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-04-06 is an appeal to this Boazd from the decision of an administrative officer; and WHEREAS, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by ]aw, and in recognition that there WERE NO protesu registered against it; and WHEREAS, the relief applied for MAY NOT be granted without detriment to the public welfaze and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations goveming the City of Wheat Ridge. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Boazd of Adjushnent Application Case No. WA-04-06 be, and hereby is, DErTIED. TYPE OF VARIANCE: A 23 1/2 foot side yazd setback variance from the 30 foot side yazd setback requirement when adjacent to a public sireet resulting in a 6 1/2 foot side yazd setback for property zoned Residential-Two (R-2). FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: A significant hardship has not been established. 2. Other conforming azrangements aze available to the applicant. VOTE: YES: ABBOTT, BELL, DRDA, HOVLAND, HOWARD NO: BLAIR ABSENT: ECHELMEYER, MOLNAR Board of Adjustment Resolution No. WA-0406 Page two (2) DISPOSITION: A request for a 23 1/2 foot side yazd setback variance from the 30 foot side yazd setback requirement when adjacent to a public street resulting in a 6 1/2 foot side yazd setback for property zoned Residential-Two (R-2) was DENIED. ADOPTED and made effective this 22nd day of Julv. 2004. Robert Blair, Chair Boazd of Adjusunent ~ . Ann Lazzeri, Secretary Boazd of Adjustment 3. Granting of the request will not be injurious to otLer properties in tLe area. q. While the request itself is a self-created hardship, the benefits to be derived by the neighborhood, and not the applicant, outweigh the effects uf the view-obscuring fence. The motion passed 5-1 with Board Member DRDA voting no and Board Members ECHELMEYER and MOLNAR absent. (Chair BLAIR declared a brief recess at 825 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 8:30 p.m.) B. Case No. WA-04-06: An application filed by Joe Stout for approval of a ~ 23 1/2 foot side yard setback variance from the 30 foot side yazd setback requirement when adjacent to a public street resulting in a 6 1/2 foot side yazd setback for property zoned Residential-Two and located at 6400 West 46`h Avenue. The case was presented by Jeff Hirt. He advised the Boazd there was jurisdiction to heaz the case. He entered all pertinent documenu into the record and reviewed the staff report and digital presentation. Staff recommended approval of the variance for reasons outlined in the staff report. Jce Stout I)R 6400 West 46* Avenue Mr. Stout was sworn in by Chair BLAIR. He explained that the variance would allow him to build a garage without removing shade trees and also preserve space in the back yazd. He stated that this is the only house in the neighborhood without a garage and that all of his neighbors have expressed theu apptoval of his plans. Boazd Member BELL commented that the proposed garaBe would be in chazacter with other homes in the area and would, in faci, be an improvement since the garage is planned to be set back a way from the comer. Boazd Member BLAIR commented that the garage would be an unprovement over the 6-foot fences placed very close to the street in the azea. Chair BLAIR asked if there were any present who wished to address this matter. There was no response. Board Member DRDA commented that there aze other locations on the property to build a garage without the need for vaciance. He stated that he could not find a hazdship in tlus case. -4- Board of Adjustment 07i22/04 Boazd Member ABBOTT agreed that a hazdship was not present, although he agreed that the application would be in character with the neighborhood. Board Member BELL asked if there were other avenues available to the applicant such as rezoning. Ms. Reckert stated that a planned development where setbacks can be modified could be applied for but it is a very expensive process. Board Member BELL referred to the variance granted in 1982 to the house "kitty comer" from the applicant. Boazd Member BELL asked if a hazdship was found in this case. Ms. Reckert referred to minutes from that case that indicated approval was for a carport (which has since been enclosed). A hazdship was found due Yo utility wires and trees on the property. Board Member BELL commented that trees and utilities on the applicant's property then seems to be a hazdship. Ms. Reckert commented that the openciess of a carport as opposed to a gazage may have been a factor in the approval. The applicant indicated he did not want to build a carport and, further, if the variance were not granted, it would be necessary to place his home on the market and move. Upon a motion by Board Member DRDA and second by Board Member HOWARD, the following resolution was stated: p~~!R/'4 ~ ~.r Whereas, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative ofricer; and Whereas, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-04-06 is aa appeal to this Board from the decisioo of an administrative officer; and Whereas, the property 6as been posted the fifteen days required by law, and in recognition thst there were no protests registered against it; and Whereas, the relief spplied for may not be granted without detriment to the pubGc welfare and without sabstanHaily impairing the intent and purpose of t6e regulaHons governing the City of Wheat Ridge. Now, tLerefore, be it resolved that Board of Adjustment Apptica6on Case No. WA-04-06 be, and hereby is, denied. Type of Variance: A 23 112 foot side yard setback vpriaace from the 30 foot side yard setback requirement when adjacent to a pubGc street resulting in a b 1/2 foot side yard setback for property zoned ResidentiAl-Two and located at 6400 West A6th Avenue. Boazd of Adjustrnent - 5 - 07122/04 For t6e following reasons: 1. A significant hardship has not been establis6ed. 2. Other conforming arrangements are available to the applicant. T 5. 6. 7. The motion for denial passed 5-1 wit6 Board Member BLAIR votiog no and Board Members ECHELMEYER aod MOLNAR absent. CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING Chair BLAIR closed the public hearing portion of the meeting. OLD BUSINESS DRAFT At the June 24t' meeting, Boazd Member ABBOTT requested a response to Board Member ECHELMEYER's allegations that staff had not followed the Board's recommendation in a case involving 3694 Chase Street. He believed the Boazd had recommended 40% ]ot coverage and staff allowed 75% lot coverage in the case. In response, Meredith Reckert clarified that, upon reseazch of records, she could fmd no action taken by the Boazd at this address. However, there have been five variances approved in this azea and the property she believed Boazd Member ECHELMEYER referred to was Case No. WA-0 1-08 at 2941 Chase Street. This case was a request for an interpretation of building height and building story as weil as a request for two side yazd setback variances. The application was eventually withdrawn by the applicant and, therefore, no action was ever taken by the Boazd. A building permit was subsequently issued for construction of a single-family residence meeting all development standards for the R-I C zone district. NEW BUSINESS Board Member BELL discussed the possibility of revisiting neighborhoods where many nonconforming situations exist to make some provisions to be able to address situations such as Mr. Stout's. While his plans were in charactet with ttte neighborhood and would have been a definite improvement to the area, there was no solid evidence of hardship. She commented she believes a hardship exists when the code is not applicable to neighborhoods that have existed for 50-60 years. Perhaps a change in the ordinance would provide for better quality of life issues as well as appearances of neighborhoods. During discussion, a suggestion was made that perhaps variance criteria need to be reviewed and changes made, if necessary. Boazd of Adjustment - 6 - 07/22/04