Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWHL-05-01Page 1 of 3 Meredith Reckert From: Alan White Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 9:43 AM To: Meredith Reckert Subject: FW: Olinger Property Importance: High For the file and I guess Council's packet. Alan White Community Development Director 303-235-2844 From: Jerry DTullio [mailto:jerryditullio@comcast.net] Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 8:38 PM To: 'Denise Lee'; khberry26@hotmail.com; t.womble@comcast.net; klpa@comcast.net; BFTireCo@aol.com; egokey@comcast.net; sangjw@netzero.net; councilorschulz@comcast.net Cc: Alan White; Randy Young; Jerry Dahl; Pam Anderson Subject: RE: Olinger Property Importance: High Hi Denise, Thank you for your enlightening and passionate email. Please be advised that the Olinger property application is now a quasi-judicial matter before City Council. This is a legal situation which does not allow Council to discuss the merits of the application outside the public hearing which is scheduled for a later date. On a separate matter, I respectfully request that name calling be avoided. It is not productive. I will forward your email to the Community Development Dept. so they can include it in the Council packet with the application. I will also "cc" the City Attorney as a matter of record. Thank you. Mayor Jerry DiTullio, Wheat Ridge 303.237.4806 Email: ierryditullio(_)comcastnet Website: www.ci.wheatridge.co.us -----Original Message----- From: Denise Lee [mailto:questions_thehrdept@msn.com] Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 11:38 AM To: jerryditullio@comcast.net; khberry26@hotmail.com; t.womble@comcast.net; klpa@comcast.net; BFTireCo@aol.com; egokey@comcast.net; sangjw@netzero.net; councilorschulz@comcast.net Subject: Olinger Property March 17, 2006 3/20/2006 Page 2 of 3 Dear Mayor and City Council, We are writing this letter in hopes that it helps all of us save the Olinger property. We have a few suggestions for you. First, you might want to take a look at the minutes from the March 16, 2006 Planning Commission meeting. The commission, unlike you, listened to the people most affected by the Olinger Property and denied the zone change. The meeting went well accept when a couple of simpletons on the commission tried to scare the residents by saying the Olinger Mansion will now to be torn down and more duplexes or an apartment complex will be built on site. "This Scheme" we feel goes against the Wheat Ridge 2020 plan. Wheat Ridge is trying to get rid of the transient population not attract more of it with an apartment complex. Even after the these scare tactics were tried the residents did not back down and the Planning Commission agreed the zone change was a BAD idea. Second, you need to take a look at the Community Development staff. The "Staff seems to be very agreeable with any destructive plan that comes along. They also appear to be telling property owners that zone changes are not a problem, before the Planning Commission and the residents even know about the proposed changes. For example, the property at 6690 W. 44th Avenue. The owner was allegedly told by the cities Community Development Department that a zone change for his liquor store was not going to be a problem. When the neighbors and City Council reviewed the rezoning it was denied. "Staff" seems to be promising things before they are approved. We personally would like to know if "Staff" live in Wheat Ridge or do they just destroy it and retire to another city? We think "Staff" need to take a long vacation. Third, the Olinger property needs to be declared an historic site including the farmhouse and pergola . According to the Wheat Ridge Historical Society the only thing stopping this in the name of the architect who built it. This is a ridiculous reason to deny the status change. Fourth, the property needs to be purchased back from the developer and turned over to the Wheat Ridge Historical Society, Jefferson County Open Space, or whoever wants to keep it the way it is. If you are able to purchase the property back there are several things that can be done with it. The mansion can be turned into Wheat Ridge's Library (the current one is tiny), a cultural center, meeting hall, or event center like Bennett Mansion and Berbert House. It can be turned into an historic public garden/park, leased to an insurance agent, another funeral home, or turned into a hospice. The lot can even be divided and sold to owners who will restore the. mansion and farmhouse and live there. Destroying the beauty of the Olinger property and quite of the neighborhood including our property values is not a good idea for Wheat Ridge. Concerned Citizens, Doreen Lee Denise Lee Dorisgene Plant 3/20/2006 Page 3 of 3 Dana Haines Kenny Haines 3/20/2006 Page 1 of 3 Pam Anderson From: kipa@comcast.net Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 10:36 AM To: Pam Anderson Subject: FW: Olinger Development Lena and Larry did not receive not sure but fairly certain public testimony has been closed... thanks.... Karen Adams Forwarded Message: From: Simone Howell Raarup <sal7howell@yahoo.com> To: khberry26@hotmail.com, t.womble@comcast.net, egokey@comcast.net, sangjw@netzero.net, klpa@comcast.net, BFTireCo@aol.com Subject: Olinger Development Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 20:47:59 +0000 Dear Council Members, I am writing to urge you to support the preservation of the Olinger Mansion and grounds, to deny the demolition permit, and to encourage a reworking of the current redevelopment proposal. Too many important buildings have been lost in Wheat Ridge due to a lack of awareness of and appreciation for their merit, regardless of designation. I was deeply saddened when I learned of this proposition and felt compelled to write you. I grew up in Wheat Ridge, graduated from Wheat Ridge High School, and my parents still live in the house where I grew up. When I describe Wheat Ridge to people now, I always refer to it as a small town community that belatedly turned into a suburb. As I hope you can appreciate, Wheat Ridge is vastly different from the beige, tract-home, generic suburban developments that dot our metropolitan area. There is a wealth of history to this community, including its dwindling architectural landmarks. Adding another commercial development to your city will do little to support this distinction, but saving one of your few landmarks will. For 92 years, the Olinger Mansion has stood on the corner of Wadsworth and 29th, witnessing the transformation of the town around it. Beyond its age, this site has become a visual icon for those who grew up nearby or who travel by it and its beautiful 02/27/2006 Page 2 of 3 pergola everyday. Think about the families with loved ones at rest in Crown Hill Cemetery. Currently, as one gazes from the cemetery to the east, one's eye might land upon the venerable white house, quietly at rest under the shade of the mature trees. Added to the site's age and its tie to a prominent regional family, it is a beautifully laid out site, with a thoughtful relationship to its surroundings. You simply can not replace this sense of place with yet another commercial development. I know that many people, particularly in the development community, will not support the protection and preservation of this site. I also realize that the notion of historic preservation is often seen as running counter to development, but I believe that these two fields can work together. Wheat Ridge is a relatively small city and as such many people discount the architectural value of its building stock. Thoughtful consideration ought to be given to our buildings before they are demolished, regardless of designation, and demolition permits should not be handed out simply because someone asks. It would probably be easy, in the short-term, to simply go along with the current redevelopment plans, but I urge you to take the longer view and consider what is really best for our community for years to come. I doubt that you can honestly state that building yet another commercial development will provide your town with the kind of visual recognition and iconic status that the Olinger site now holds. I hope that there will be good discussion on this subject and that public input will be taken into consideration. It is unfortunate that there has been such controversy about this issue, but I hope that you will support expansive and creative thinking on this and other issues. There are many organizations whose mission is to provide technical preservation assistance, help identify funding for preservation projects, and explore creative ideas for new uses for a site. I would be more than happy to provide you with a list of names and contact information should that be of interest to you and the Mayor. Kind regards, Simone Howell Raarup 200 Pearl Street, #405 Denver, CO 80203 02/27/2006 Meredith Reckert From: Laura Driver [lauradriver@mac.com] Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 11:52 AM To: kmurphy@getty.edu Subject: Press Release: Locals Fight Demolition of Historical Gem Press Advisory February 27, 2006 Contact: Kevin Murphy, Wheat Ridge Community Activist Cell 310-266-5214 Wheat Ridge Locals Fight Demolition of Historical Gem by Developer Wheat Ridge City Council will meet again to decide the fate ofthe 92 year old Olinger Mansion, the home to George and Margaret Olinger, who started Olinger Mortuaries in 1901. The Historical Society and Wheat Ridge residents have submitted petitions to support the preservation of the mansion, pergola, barn, well and farm houses as a landmark. Without City Council approval, the developers, DHE Wadsworth LLC and ASM Casa LLC, cannot change or tear down the mansion and property details. Unfortunately, the situation has become heated and political with the developers rejecting all proposals submitted by the Historical Society. The meeting will take place Monday, February 27th at 7pm at the Wheat Ridge Municipal Building to review the Historical Landmark status application. Residents in Wheat Ridge and the surrounding areas have been encouraged to attend this important meeting to oppose more unwanted commercial space and support Wheat Ridge's architectural and cultural history. FEB 2 3 2006 Jefferson County Historical Commission Golden, Colorado 2006 OFFICERS CHAIR STAN MOORE TREASURER Lucy BArmREY VICE CHAIR BUD WEARE CORRESPONDING SECRETARY RITA PETERSON RECORDING SECRETARY SALLY WHrrE February 19, 2006 Mayor and City Council of Wheat Ridge 7500 West 29" Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033-8001 RE: Olinger Property 7495 West 29" Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO Dear Mesdames and Sirs: Jefferson County Historical Commission (JCHC) has been informed of the efforts to work out a means of preserving the historically significant buildings and site features on the Olinger Property in Wheat Ridge and would like to respectfully enter a voice of support. We strongly support a respectful compromise addressing a clear perception of each party's views before the council vote on February 27, 2006. In a recently completed survey of historic buildings within Jefferson County, JCHC discovered that less than of a percent of the total current building stock in unincorporated county were historic sites with enough remaining integrity to convey our origins and heritage to an ever- expanding population. These significant sites were culled from a list five rimes the size, where other properties had either been demolished or dramatically altered so that they no longer spoke to the history of our origins. Of this small list of properties, buildings are still lost to demolition and development each year because the county has no regulatory historic preservation provisions to protect them. JCHC recognizes that preserving our past and integrating into our present and future development has broad economic and social value, as it plays a vital role in our identity as a county, and makes a strong contribution to the quality of life and environment as well. Just as we are working to preserve our sense of origins and heritage as a county, we support our sister municipalities within the county in saving what is unique to them as they develop. Savvy developers all over the country are learning that new development that will be more viable in the long-run can and should incorporate historic features that integrate the new with the old. Beloved buildings that speak to our connections in history are what draw people to a new development when they have a choice between that and something more generic and cookie-cutter in character. Though we appreciate your challenge of addressing property owner rights, to allow the demolition of the wonderful Olinger property would be a sad and irrevocable decision that future generations would lament as an undesirable loss. Once again, we applaud the efforts being made to work through this issue. Should there be any way we can assist in these efforts, please do not hesitate to contact us. Respectfully, f 4 4r~ - Deborah Andrews Jefferson County Historical Commission Historic Preservation Committee Cc: Stan Moore, chair, Jefferson County Historic Commission 6 U M ~ O O 00 M V N M pi y{ ce Q ct~ N O N a c "j I-am ~Yl7CLYSUYI, Page 1 of 1 Pam Anderson From: klpa@comcast.net Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 8:08 AM To: Pam Anderson Subject: FW: Olinger Property Rezoning I know we are done taking testimony on this issue but I see not all were copied on this so not sure what if any packet it should be in. thanks Adams Forwarded Message: From: "Doreen Lee" <leedll 129@msn.com> To: <egokey@comcast.net>, <sangjw@netzero.net>, <klpa@comcast.net>, <BFTireCo@aol.com>, <councilorschulz@comcast.net> Subject: Olinger Property Rezoning Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 17:00:01 +0000 We are writing this email because we are concerned about the zone change for the Olinger property. We do not want any commercial development in our neighborhood! People are already beginning to sell their homes because they fear the worst. Commercial development would only hurt our quiet neighborhood and drop our property values. We already have enough traffic through the neighborhood (including police) and becomes worse if there is an accident on Wadsworth. How would you like to have your $300,000+ house/property backup to a strip mall with a bunch of dumpsters or a four-story office building where the occupants can peer down on you in your yard? We would especially enjoy a smelly restaurant or a fast food joint that would attract a bunch of teenagers to hang around! Would you want to sit in your backyard with all that noise and unappealing smells? We already get enough smells (hops) from Coors. Wheat Ridge needs to concentrate on redevelopment (buying up and selling all the rentals as single family homes) and the transient population not changing what works. The Olinger property should be declared a historical landmark including the parking lot. If a dentist or insurance agent wants to set up a small office in the existing building that would be fine. The property should not be rezoned. The developer bought it as a zone 2 and he can sell it or use it as a zone 2. If the developer cannot make enough money as a zone 2 who cares? No one seems to care that a zone change would devalue our land! Thank you, Angry Wheat Ridge Residents and Voters Doreen Lee Denise Lee Kenny Haines Dana Haines Dorisgene Plant 2/6/2006 Pam Anderson From: Karen Berry [khberry26@hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 1:42 PM To: klpa@comcast.net; egokey@comcast.net; sangjw@netzero.net; councilorschulz@comcast.net; BFtireCo@aol.com; t.womble@comcast.net Cc: Randy Young; Jerry DiTullio; Pam Anderson; Alan White Subject: Message sent concerning Olinger Mansion Dear Jill: In response to your question, the case was continued for decision only. I will be sending an email to council stating that, if new information is presented by the applicant, staff, or landowner, I will make a motion to open the hearing to allow additional testimony from the public. I totally agree with you that you should be able to respond to any new testimony or information. Thanks for taking the time to voice your concerns. Sincerely, Karen Berry >From: "Jill Strunk" <jill_strunk@msn.com> >To: ><khberry26@hotmail.com>,<t.womble@comcast.net>,<egokey@comcast.net>,<sa >ngjw@netzero.net>,<klpa@comcast.net>,<BFTireCo@aol.com>,<councilorschul >z@comcast.net>,"'Jerry >DiTulliol" <jerryditullio@comcast.net> >Subject: Olinger Mansion >Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 19:06:08 -0700 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >X-Originating-IP: [70.59.36.57] >X-Originating-Email: [jill strunk@msn.com] >X-Sender: jill_strunk@msn.com >Received: from omc2-s33.bay6.hotmail.com ([65.54.249.43]) by >bay0-mc9-f4.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Sun, >19 Feb 2006 18:06:38 -0800 >Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.224.81]) by >omc2-s33.bay6.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Sun, 19 >Feb 2006 18:06:14 -0800 >Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft >SMTPSVC; Sun, 19 Feb 2006 18:06:14 -0800 >Received: from 70.59.36.57 by BAY105-DAV9.phx.gbl with DAV;Mon, 20 Feb >2006 >02:06:14 +0000 >X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78j GuWFBuhofpQu4p6wXRZJklOEvzFZloACc= >X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 >Thread-Index: AcYlwjaHfltLLpnsRmS1JZ4YbQ5V7w== >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Feb 2006 02:06:14.0342 (OTC) >FILETIME=[3A399E6O:O1C635C2]- >Return-Path: jill_strunk@msn.com >Dear Mayor and Wheat Ridge City Council, >When my husband and I bought our house at 6915 W. 29th Avenue five >years ago, one of the things we loved about the neighborhood was the >feeling that we were buying into the history of our community. We loved >the tree lined streets, the older houses and the beautiful mansion at >the end of the street. >We met our neighbor at 6815 W. 29th Avenue, Emma Bohm, who was 101 when >we bought our home and at one time owned the property that our house, >as well as several of the surrounding homes, now resides on. We live >across the street from the oldest house in Wheat Ridge. We take our two. >boys for walks up and down the streets around the neighborhood. We go >to the park across from the mansion and next to the City building. >We fear that if that beautiful mansion, the barn, the pergola and the >old farm house are demolished, it will completely alter the lovely feel >of our community. We bought our home because we knew that the community >was built out and that there wouldn't be a ton of development. In our >opinion, a new office complex and restaurant would significantly change >the neighborhood for the worse. >Our sincerest hope is that you, as our Mayor and Council members, will >preserve these historic structures. We hope that DHE Wadsworth LLC and >ASM Casa LLC will be able to create their office complex within the >walls of the mansion and leave the other buildings as they are. >Thank you, > >Jill & Dave Strunk >303.232.2676 On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how to get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement 2 February 15,2006 Lena Rotola District Council Member IV 4565 Field Street Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Dear Lena Rotola As a resident of your district I am writing regarding the Olinger property at 29th and Wadsworth. I hope you will vote for the preservation of this property because of its history related to this area and its proximity to city hall and Crown Hill. Your effort in this matter is appreciated. Sincerely, l i Margaret De Rose 4745 Dover Street Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 303-422-0709 o n o z ~d ~c~a o d ntza yy y~~ ° ~ maa x o o 1 CD CD ~j ao 0 CD m o w 0 O "g co o * 2 O CD t 0 c ) 0 c l ID o ° CD e'o CD o CD CD WI CD CD C :r"r1 'cS Q" CD CJQ 5 ° G. O a: " w <D ~ m p~ O i ~ ti • CD o FF~.~-~ y• 5 CD ~ O F•~•I CD CD 0. 00 CD ° m taD ' S ~ 0 ~ ~ m O dQ p t G. l SD Loa CWD CD I..na C l"F O CO, O N M O r CD CD tj A ~ F• pt 'Y 0 r 1 ° E • m o O - o r. O e! Q UQ ~.e awn C 0 CD c ° O o o o CD Q o d CD . ' D CD w rn ~ 0 x M El`s W CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: FEBRUARY 27, 2006 Page -2- Item 1. CONSENT AGENDA: A. Motion to approve an Investment Oversight Committee. B. Award ITB-06-12 2005 Crack Seal Project in the amount not to exceed $43,301.50. C. RESOLUTION 08-2006 - AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2006 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO REFLECT THE APPROVAL OF A SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $95,003.26 FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT RADIO UPGRADE PROJECT. Consent Agenda was introduced and read by Mr. Stites. Mr. Gokey asked to pull Item C. Motion by Mr. Stites for approval of the Consent Agenda Items A, and B.; seconded by Councilmembers Schulz and Rotola; carried 8-0. Motion by Mr. Gokey to approve Resolution 08-2006-A Resolution Amending the Fiscal Year 2006 General Fund Budget to Reflect the Approval of a Supplemental Budget Appropriation in the Amount of $95,003.26 for the Police Department Radio Upgrade Project; seconded by Mrs. Sang; carried 8-0. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ORDINANCES ON SECOND READING F Item 2. A REQUEST FOR HISTORICAL LANDMARK DESIGNATION FOR PROPERTY ZONED RESIDENTIAL-TWO (R-2) LOCATED AT 7495 W. 29TH AVENUE. (CASE NO. WHL-05-01) (CONTINUED FROM JANUARY 23, 2006 FOR ACTION ONLY) Item 2 was introduced by Mr. Womble. City Clerk Pam Anderson read the executive summary. Motion by Mr. Womble that the City Council decline to approve the application under Case No. WHL-05-01 for the following reasons: The absence of sufficient factors under Section 26-906 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws; The property owner does not consent to the designation; and The applicant and property owner have reached an agreement with respect to the preservation of certain structures and elements on the site. I further move that Case No. WHL-05-01 be postponed indefinitely. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: FEBRUARY 27, 2006 Page -3- I further move that City Council's action shall not take effect until the approval by the City Council of an Outline Development Plan for the subject property, which approval shall contain as conditions that: 1. The Olinger house shall be retained in its present location and exterior condition; normal maintenance and upkeep excepted. 2. The interior of the main house may be used for any purpose permitted by the then-current zoning. 3. The existing pergola shall be moved, if feasible, to a location or locations on the subject property or shall be reconstructed at one or more locations on the subject property. 4. An option to acquire the old house and barn on the site (for no monetary consideration) shall be granted to any responsible organization, conditioned upon such option being exercised and the buildings moved off of the site prior to the initiation of any construction on the site by the owner. 5. (a) No application for a demolition permit shall be accepted, nor any such permit issued by the City for the Olinger house (mansion) or the pergola until the pending ODP application for the subject property has either been approved or denied, pursuant to the customary review process for such applications. (b) The architectural design of any new structures on the property will be consistent with the elements of the architectural style of the Olinger house, including such elements as, by way of example, roof lines and shapes, building materials and colors, window patterns, building size, building mass. 6. The property owner shall have consented to the foregoing conditions of an Outline Development Plan approval on the record before the City Council. I further move that in the event the ODP shall not have been approved, with all of the foregoing conditions, prior to April 24, 2006, the denial of Case No. WHL-05-01 shall not take effect and said case shall be rescheduled for action only by the Council at the next available regular Council meeting; seconded by Mr. Gokey. Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. Janelle Shaver, 8890 W. 35th Avenue, spoke on behalf of the Wheat Ridge Historical Society. She gave documents to the City Clerk to be distributed to Council. City Clerk Pam Anderson asked if it was appropriate to distribute these items. City Attorney Dahl stated that the hearing was closed on January 23, 2006 and that includes any written documents which are the same as testimony. The only exception to that is statements that are taken from the applicant, property owner and staff on the proposal tonight. Additional documents going in the record are the same as testimony, of course we are preventing others from testifying and that would apply as well to the Historical Society and any additional exhibits. We are going to hold those in a file and indicate they were exhibits received after the hearing had already been closed. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: FEBRUARY 27, 2006 Page -4- Janelle Shaver continued her testimony and gave background on the Historical Society. They are in support of an Outline Development Plan for the Olinger property based on the provision that a final ODP contain nine specific conditions, which she outlined in detail. She read a letter from James Lindberg, Director of Preservation Initiatives and Rural Heritage of the National Trust for Historic Preservation. She also read an e-mail from Steve Turner, Director of Preservation Services for Historic Denver. Andrew Miller, 200 Spruce Street, Denver, property owner gave background on how he bought the property in summer of 2005 with the clear understanding that Wadsworth is a great commercial street. Had he known this controversy would erupt, he would have never bought the property. He has tried to come up with a proposal that would address everybody's concerns. He outlined all the concessions and compromises he has planned. Eighty percent (80%) of the beautiful trees on the property are diseased and will have to come down. City Council asked questions of staff, the applicant and the property owner. Lee Callas, 4390 Dover Street, answered questions from Council regarding potential funding for preservation efforts. Motion carried 8-0. Recess called at 8:21 pm. Meeting resumed at 8:33 p.m. Item 3. A REQUEST FOR THE APPROVAL OF A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PLAT FOR PROPERTY ZONED PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 4900 AND 4990 PARFET STREET. (CASE NOS. WZ-05-11 AND MS-05-04) (PHARO FOR BEAR LAND HOLDINGS) Item 3 was introduced by Mrs. Rotola. Ms. Anderson read the executive summary. Mayor DiTullio opened the public hearing. Councilor Adams stated for the record that she met with John Medved on unrelated matters on January 24, 2006. They were both aware of the application at that meeting and did not discuss the proposed application. On the advice of the City Attorney, she was requested to make this disclosure and the fact that this meeting will not prevent her from voting on this pending application. Mayor DiTullio swore in all individuals intending to testify in the public hearing. Meredith Reckert made the staff presentation. She submitted the zoning ordinance, subdivision regulations, case file and packet materials, and exhibits. She stated that all notification and posting requirements have been met and that there is jurisdiction to hear the case. o w„Eqr ITEM NO: u 9n REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MEETING DATE: February 27, 2006 TITLE: A REQUEST FOR HISTORICAL LANDMARK DESIGNATION FOR PROPERTY ZONED RESIDENTIAL-TWO (R-2) LOCATED AT 7495 W. 29TH AVENUE (CASE NO. WHL-05-01) ❑ PUBLIC HEARING ® BIDS/MOTIONS ❑ RESOLUTIONS Quasi-Judicial: Yes ❑ ORDINANCES FOR 1 ST READING ❑ ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING No Community Development Director EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: - ~ `-'IUVr City M~anag4f This public hearing was concluded on January 23, 2005 and continued for action only to February 27, 2005. Council's motion directed staff, the landowner and the Historical Society to meet to attempt to reach a compromise regarding the historical designation on the property. COMMISSIONBOARD RECOMMENDATION: The Wheat Ridge Historical Society recommended approval of the designation at a public hearing held on December 14, 2005. STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES: Staff, the landowner, and representatives of the Historical Society met on February 15'h. Attached is a roster listing the attendees at this meeting. Mr. Andy Miller, a partner in the ownership of the site, presented his proposal for saving some of the structures on the site. The proposal is to preserve the Olinger house at its current location and in its current configuration and move or replicate the pergola somewhere else on the site, without the historical designation of the entire I further move that City Council's action shall not take effect until the approval by the City Council of an Outline Development Plan for the subject property, which approval shall contain as conditions that: the Olinger house shall be retained in its present location and exterior condition; normal maintenance and upkeep excepted; 2. the interior of the main house may be used for any purpose permitted by the then-current zoning; 3. the existing pergola shall be moved, if feasible, to a location or locations on the subject property or shall be reconstructed at one or more locations on the subject property; 4. an option to acquire the old house and barn on the site (for no monetary consideration) shall be granted to any responsible organization, conditioned upon such option being exercised and the buildings moved off of the site prior to the initiation of any construction on the site by the owner; 5. the architectural design of any new structures on the property will borrow elements of the architectural style of the Olinger house, including such elements as, by way of example, roof lines and shapes, building materials and colors, window patterns, building size, building mass; and 6. the property owner shall have consented to the foregoing conditions of an Outline Development Plan approval on the record before the City Council. I further move that in the event the ODP shall not have been approved, with all of the foregoing conditions, prior to April 24, 2006, the denial of Case No. WHL-05-01 shall not take effect and said case shall be rescheduled for action only by the Council at the next available regular Council meeting." Report Prepared by: Alan White (303-235-2844) Attachments: 1. Attendance of 2/15/06 Meeting 2. Letter from Wheat Ridge Historical Society tD (1) C) C N T a L ' N L LO G? LL ti d t c~ a m a~ e F- 3 z o IL ° e w E U) C LLJ p J a mI \il z o ~ ~ M ~ M C-n a u r It ~I I J nl 11 N cli ~7 Cfl ATTACHMENT 1 N r m CEO V` O ~ a Ov N M J- r% 1 C"1 fn Q Q M M v ~ rU 0 d 0 3 U 1 3 M a7 r!' ,Z j UN s 3 b Q O r N M 4 6 Cfl ti OO ti c6 6 r r r r r r r r Date: Wednesday, February 22nd 2006 DRAFT To: Wheat Ridge City Council From: Wheat Ridge Historical Society Subject: Compromise Regarding Historical Designation of Olinger Property Introduction The Wheat Ridge Historical Society (WRNS) continues to be of the opinion that all of the Olinger property at 29th & Wadsworth merits landmark designation. Since that option has met with resistance from the owners we have agreed to a compromise that allows for preservation of some of the most significant structures/features on the site. From an historic perspective, the property contains the following contributing structures/features: 1) 1914 Olinger House, 2) Pergola, 3) Sunken Gardens, 4) Pump house, 5) 1892 Farmhouse, and 6) 1892 Bam. The Olinger House is by far the most significant structure with its closely associated Pergola and Sunken Gardens. The Pump house is significant as an example of our rural heritage relating to water and ditch rights. The Farm house and its associated Barn have their own important story to tell of the property's earlier agricultural connection. Non-contributing structures/features include the 1969 Chapel, the 1950's Garage, and the existing parking lot. Background The WRHS also believes, as do a large and growing number of extremely worried members of the community, that the property clearly meets the criteria for such designation. It is a well-documented fact that George Olinger was an important historic figure in Wheat Ridge, Jefferson County, and the surrounding Denver metro area. Indeed, under Sec.26-902 (Intent and Purposes) of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws such designation would A. "Preserve, protect, enhance and regulate"... a "reminder of past eras... "and a person of local historic importance" (George W. Olinger); B. "Ensure that the historic character of the property is preserved in development" of the property; C. "Stimulate cultural dimensions by fostering the knowledge of Wheat Ridge's heritage and cultivate civic pride in accomplishments of the past"; and D. Allow for future "cooperation with state and federal historic preservation efforts". ATTACHMENT 2 DUAFT Regarding criteria (Sec.26-906): While a property need only meet one(1) of the criteria for historic designation, the WRHS submits that the Olinger property actually meets four(4) of the criteria: 2.a. It exemplifies or reflects the broad cultural or social history of Wheat Ridge, 2.b. It is identified with an historic person, 2.c. The pergola is a distinguishing feature valuable for the study of its period, 2.e. Unanimous recommendation by the WRHS board of directors. We also believe that historic designation will not interfere with part A.1 of Sec 26-906 (i.e. the owners' ability to earn a reasonable return). There are a number of financial benefits for the landowner as outlined in Sec.26-904 (Benefits of historic landmark designation). There are tax incentives, investment tax credits, private or public grants such as the State Historic Fund and economic incentives to name a few. The WRHS would stand ready to assist in those processes whenever necessary. Furthermore, new development could be accomplished under the provisions of Sec 26-911 and by following normal land-use processes. Other cities (e.g. Golden, Arvada and Littleton) have successfully demonstrated that historic properties can produce a reasonable financial return for property owners and their municipalities. We might point out here that Sec 26 Art D{ probably needs to be updated to include provisions for the now-common concept of historic districts. That said, nothing in the current code disallows new construction on an historic property and both major and minor changes are allowed. In addition, rezoning for other uses is perfectly acceptable on historic properties, which would further increase the possibilities for financial return. The WRHS has absolutely no objections to that. Wheat Ridge prides itself on being a community with unique features. The 20/20 plan encourages us to embrace our heritage. We feel historic designation of the property, even with appropriate new development added, would be a great asset to our community. The wish of the WRHS remains to have the property developed with historic designation to safeguard this distinctive local landmark. Report of Meeting On January 23, 2006 the City Council directed staff, the owner, and the applicant (WRHS) to meet and reach a compromise. Subsequent to that, the owners have met with city staff to revise the owners' Outline Development Plan. On Wednesday, February 15, six members of the WRHS Board of Directors met at the Olinger House for a tour. This tour was facilitated by city staff at the owners' approval. Others in attendance included Jim Lindberg (Director of Preservation Initiatives from the National Trust for Historic Preservation), Steve Turner (Director of Preservation Services from Historic Denver, Inc.), Mark Rodman (Executive Director from Colorado Preservation, Inc.), Debra Andrews and Millie Roeder (two Board Members from the Jefferson County Historical Commission), Alan Feinstein (Executive Director for Jeffco Housing Authority), Bill Lundsford (Housing Development Manager for the City of Lakewood), Valeria Horan (Grand-daughter of George Olinger), and Ann Schwayder (Denver Post) and half a dozen others interested in the project. After the tour, five members of the WRHS Board of Directors met with one of the owners, Andrew Miller, at City Hall with Randy Young and City Staff. Also in attendance for a portion of the meeting DRAFT were the two gentlemen from the National Trust and Historic Denver, and Alan Feinstein. At this meeting Mr. Miller presented his new plan for development of the Olinger Property. As we understand it, this new plan is the end-result of work on the part of the owners within their organization and with City Staff. The new plan was not open for change, although the discussion following Mr. Miller's presentation was seen by us to be constructive at the time. While presenting and discussing his new plan for commercial use of the Olinger Property, Mr. Miller shared with us insights into his world of development where, in the case of an acquisition such as the Olinger Property, development would ordinarily involve Demolition of the old and Construction of the new according to the Uniform Building Code. As part of the discussion, we made it clear that the WRNS was founded on an interest in the history of Wheat Ridge where, its mission involves Preservation, Rehabilitation, Restoration, & Reconstruction of our local heritage according to The Secretary of Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. By the end of the meeting, we were asked to support the owners' new plan with the understanding that City Staff would recommend denial of the WRNS application for the Historic Preservation of the entire Olinger Property in trade for specific conditions to be contained within the owners' final approved Outline Development Plan. It was our understanding at the meeting that development of the property with these specific conditions would insure that three of the historically significant structures/features would be saved on-site, and two of the other historically significant structures would be offered for rescue off site. To this end, we appreciated the owners' willingness to make the saving of the Olinger House, Pergola, and Sunken Gardens a reality. Conditions of Compromise In consideration of the meeting and information we have since received, and with reference to The Secretary of Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties (see Standards attached), this report is submitted in support of an Outline Development Plan for the Olinger Property based on the provision that the final approved ODP contains specific conditions that portray the following intentions: 1. The property shall be subdivided into two parcels (see Site Plan attached) leaving the southern parcel containing the Olinger House, the Chapel and the Sunken Gardens as it is; 2. A deed restriction in perpetuity shall be recorded requiring that the Standards for Rehabilitation shall be applied to the exterior of the Olinger House and its existing setting, which includes the formal front entranceway, the design landscape around the house, and the mature healthy trees; 3. In the meeting it was presented to us that the Pergola needed to be moved due to existing CDOT right-of-way and future plans to widen Wadsworth. We have since learned from CDOT that plans do not yet exist for the widening of Wadsworth between 32"d Avenue and Colfax; the Pergola is not currently in jeopardy from State Highway dedication and won't be for many years. Thus, the Pergola shall remain in its historic location and shall be reconstructed by an experienced Preservation Contractor capable of performing the work in adherence with the Standards for Reconstruction; 4. The existing Sunken Gardens shall be retained under the Standards for Preservation. If the Sunken Gardens become endangered, then an alternate treatment plan (i.e. Rehabilitation or Reconstruction) shall be adopted. The choice of alternative treatment plan will recognize the Sunken Gardens is a significant historical feature associated closely with the Olinger House's original use and has priority over the Chapel in its consideration for ultimate survival on the property in its original location; t'qY f- 5. The existing 1892 Farmhouse and 1892 Barn shall be offered for removal from the property (for no monetary consideration) to any responsible party, conditioned upon such option being exercised and the building moved off of the site prior to the initiation of any construction on the site by the owners; 6. The architectural design of any new structures, including associated signage features, on the property will borrow elements of the architectural style of the Olinger House, including such elements as, by way of example, roof lines and shapes, building materials and colors, window patterns, building size, and building mass; 7. The existing trees on the southern parcel shall not be removed for reasons other than verified condition of disease. All reasonable attempts to leave existing healthy trees on the northern parcel shall be made excepting the removal of trees absolutely deemed necessary by the owners for new construction on the northern parcel; 8. The access onto the property from the northeast comer shall be restricted to "pedestrian only" traffic; 9. The property owners shall have consented to the foregoing conditions of the Outline Development Plan approval on the record before the City Council. Partine Thouehts We are continuing to discuss the issue of standards of rehabilitation, reconstruction, and preservation as applied to the House, Pergola and Sunken Gardens. It is critical to the City of Wheat Ridge that some standards be in place, in addition to the recorded deed restriction, to make 'saving the Olinger mansion' meaningful. Although no answer to the preservation of all the historically significant structures/features on the property is immediately available and no long-term guarantee exists for the saving of the entire property unchanged, the WRHS feels the proposed compromise presents one possible solution for the Olinger Property's continued presence in Wheat Ridge as a unique and irreplaceable landmark. I STANDARDS FOR REHABILITATION NOTE: AS APPLIED TO THE OLINGER HOUSE & ITS SETTING, THE TERM "PROPERTY" WOULD BE REPLACED WITH THE TERM "HOUSE & SETTING" IN THE STANDARDS AS LISTED BELOW. REHABILITATION IS DEFINED AS the act or process of making possible a compatible use for a property through repair, alterations, and additions while preserving those portions or features which convey its historical, cultural, or architectural values. 1. A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships. 2. The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided. 3. Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or elements from other historic properties, will not be undertaken. 4. Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right will be retained and preserved. 5. Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved. 6. Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in design, color, texture, and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features will be substantiated by documentary and physical evidence. 7. Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will not be used. 8. Archeological resources will be protected and preserved in place. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken. 9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work will be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment. 10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in a such a manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. Rehabilitation as a Treatment When repair and replacement of deteriorated features are necessary; when alterations or additions to the property are planned for a new or continued use; and when its depiction at a particular period of time is not appropriate, Rehabilitation may be considered as a treatment. STANDARDS FOR RECONSTRUCTION NOTE: AS APPLIED TO THE OLINGER PERGOLA, THE TERM "PROPERTY" WOULD BE REPLACED WITH THE TERM "PERGOLA" IN THE STANDARDS AS LISTED BELOW. RECONSTRUCTION IS DEFINED AS the act or process of depicting, by means of new construction, the form, features, and detailing of a non-surviving site, landscape, building, structure, or object for the purpose of replicating its appearance at a specific period of time and in its historic location. 1. Reconstruction will be used to depict vanished or non-surviving portions of a property when documentary and physical evidence is available to permit accurate reconstruction with minimal conjecture, and such reconstruction is essential to the public understanding of the property. 2. Reconstruction of a landscape, building, structure, or object in its historic location will be preceded by a thorough archeological investigation to identify and evaluate those features and artifacts which are essential to an accurate reconstruction. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken. 3. Reconstruction will include measures to preserve any remaining historic materials, features, and spatial relationships. 4. Reconstruction will be based on the accurate duplication of historic features and elements substantiated by documentary or physical evidence rather than on conjectural designs or the availability of different features from other historic properties. A reconstructed property will re-create the appearance of the non-surviving historic property in materials, design, color, and texture. 5. A reconstruction will be clearly identified as a contemporary re-creation. 6. Designs that were never executed historically will not be constructed. Reconstruction as a Treatment When a contemporary depiction is required to understand and interpret a property's historic value (including the re-creation of missing components in a historic district or site when no other property with the same associative value has survived; and when sufficient historical documentation exists to ensure an accurate reproduction, Reconstruction may be considered as a treatment. STANDARDS FOR PRESERVATION AFT NOTE: AS APPLIED TO THE OLINGER SUNKEN GARDENS, THE TERM "PROPERTY" WOULD BE REPLACED WITH THE TERM "SUNKEN GARDENS" IN THE STANDARDS AS LISTED BELOW. PRESERVATION IS DEFINED as the act or process of applying measures necessary to sustain the existing form, integrity, and materials of an historic property. Work, including preliminary measures to protect and stabilize the property, generally focuses upon the ongoing maintenance and repair of historic materials and features rather than extensive replacement and new construction. New exterior additions are not within the scope of this treatment; however, the limited and sensitive upgrading of mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems and other code-required work to make properties functional is appropriate within a preservation project. 1. A property will be used as it was historically, or be given a new use that maximizes the retention of distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships. Where a treatment and use have not been identified, a property will be protected and, if necessary, stabilized until additional work may be undertaken. 2. The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The replacement of intact or repairable historic materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided. 3. Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Work needed to stabilize, consolidate, and conserve existing historic materials and features will be physically and visually compatible, identifiable upon close inspection, and properly documented for future research. 4. Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right will be retained and preserved. 5. Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved. 6. The existing condition of historic features will be evaluated to determine the appropriate level of intervention needed. Where the severity of deterioration requires repair or limited replacement of a distinctive feature, the new material will match the old in composition, design, color, and texture. 7. Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will not be used. 8. Archeological resources will be protected and preserved in place. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken. Preservation as a Treatment When the property's distinctive materials, features, and spaces are essentially intact and thus convey the historic significance without extensive repair or replacement; when depiction at a particular period of time is not appropriate; and when a continuing or new use does not require additions or extensive alterations, Preservation may be considered as a treatment. p .cqa' j y! a /r 6 § gg 2 y`[ igbi•~ I $3 i f b FFg -Y' c a Y~ Yiu fq yg dd qg R.a Y ? a ' 6E ~ yyyCc~.y$~~ ~ ~"~~4x" ~ ~ ~-i~t g cgs 6qE~~ . ~ Y c r° Fqpg ~e€'r~ye 3 Is) 'b~ ~yY~~~ ~ $a ~YS $a ~Z.. ~$a~xE3 ay g ~k-~€ ~ ees a Al; ec fi €a s¢a "s7a M 0. - ? 4 Q. Org N~ W ~ . 3$ - w$ h Z~ _P - <Z LEI n 7 Y/r ie O' n ~ N J z o Q U ' N 4 a w N S r Z. 0 w E U O J W a V • ~ Y a. V i~ q fS9~ 4~ a a-.0p0 rYle ~ Oa~j• ~g - n ~ 2 1 ~~~flf Page 1 of 2 Meredith Reckert From: Alan White Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 9:03 AM To: Meredith Reckert Subject: FW: Historic Society application on Olinger property FYI for Monday night. Alan White Community Development Director 303-235-2844 From: Gerald Dahl [mailto:gdahl@mdkrlaw.com] Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 1:07 AM To: Randy Young Cc: Alan White Subject: Historic Society application on Olinger property Randy, You have asked for my opinion regarding whether the Council could reopen the public hearing on this matter on February 27 to allow additional persons to testify. I have reviewed the applicable portions of the historic preservation article of the Code of Laws and conclude that this is not permitted. Code Section 26-905 (process for designation of historic landmark), at subsection E, controls this question. It provides, among other things, that: Notice of the public hearing on the application must be published, posted and sent to the owner at least 15 days prior to the hearing. . If the property owner files an objection (which is the case here), the hearing must be held within 45 days of the City's receipt of the recommendation from the Historic Society. In January, the Council conducted the public hearing, closed it, and continued the matter to February 27 "for action only" This clearly means that the hearing was concluded. It is permissible for staff to describe the proposed motion on Feb 27, and for the applicant Historic Society and the property owner to make short statements regarding their positions on that proposed motion. These all pertain to the action proposed to be taken, are within the scope of the Council's motion to continue to February 27 "for action only," and does not result in the public hearing being reopened. However, to allow additional testimony beyond the limited statements described above would be to reopen the hearing. This cannot be done without re-noticing the hearing as required by Code Section 26-905.E. Further, even if a new hearing were to be properly renoticed, it would fall outside the required 45 day period imposed by that same section. I conclude that the Council must act on February 27, and that, beyond the limited statements permitted as described, may not take additional public testimony. Would you please arrange to have this message routed to the Mayor and Council? Thank you. 2/23/2006 North Denver explores historic designation and development The Wheat Ridge Historical Society applied for Historic Designation for the Olinger mansion located at Wadsworth and 29th Avenue. A developer who purchased the property wishes to rezone the 4.5 acre property for commercial development. the hearing to determine the landmark status of the site has been continued to Monday, February 27, 7:00 p.m., Wheat Ridge City Hall. Historic Denver is currently studying the feasibility of creating a historic district in a sub area of West Highlands bounded by Perry to Lowell, 32nd to 29th Avenue. by Elise Cohen WEST HIGHLANDS - In an RI and R2 zoned property, demolition and reconstruc- tion is a "use by right.." H the property gets reclassified as part of a Historic District the ability of a homeowner to scrape off an older home in order to replace it with a new home becomes a much more complicated procedure. Before an area can be designat- ed as a historic area, studies must be made, property owners must be informed, and nation of a historic district serves to pre- serve, protect, enhance and perpetuate buildings within the district which reflect outstanding elements of the city's cultural; artistic, social, economic, political, architec rural, historic or other heritage; Foster civic pride in the beauty and accomplishments of the past; Stabilize or improve the aesthetic and economic vitality and values of such structures and districts; Protect and enhance the city's attraction to tourists and visitors; Promote the use of outstanding his- public hearings will beheld. On March 7th, Historic Denver, neighborhood rep- resentatives and Front Range Research Associates will be at the monthly West Highland Neighborhood Association meeting to : present the progress toward creating a historic district in the small portion of West Highland called the Wolff Subdivision. Now that intensive surveys have been completed more is known about the potential historic district. Front Range Research Associates will present the results of the survey and the proposed boundary of the Denver Landmark historic district. Bring your questions about the impacts/benefits of such a district. According to Historic Denver, Inc. "desig- torical or architec- tural structures or districts for the edu- cation, stimulation and welfare of the people of the city;; Promote good urban design including the per- petuation of related private open spaces; and Promote and encourage contin- ued private owner- ship and utilization of such buildings and other struc- tures now so owned and used, to the extent that the objectives listed above can be attained under such a policy." Property owners who wish to redevelop, their property within the area should plan to attend this meeting, as well as any future' public meetings, in order to fully under- stand the implications of the historic desig- nation. "Growing Democracy" preview DOWNTOWN - Join ArgusFest for a sneak peek preview of Keya Lea Horiuchi's new film, `Growing Democracy'. Keya will be present for Q&A following this'screen- ing. In GROWING DEMOCRACY, filmmaker Keya Lea Horiuchi travels around the world to learn what people living outside of the U.S. think about it, specifically in `terms of U.S. healthcare, media outlets and foreign policy. During this process, she uncovers information and views rarely discussed within the American media. She weaves the international point of view with the widely polarized American point of view, while presenting facts and statistics. While the United States is a superpow- er, its policies are very different when compared to other industrial democracies. But are Americans aware of this discrep- ancy? While Americans are continually told through their media that freedom and democracy are promoted in countries abroad; a very different point of view is expressed from outside of the U.S. Thursday, February 23 , 7:00 pm Mercury Cafe 2199 California St, 'Denver try Club, wonde by oonthirPe Izni Howarth, The Harp School for Harmonious living, but several awardswere also given out The GoldenUibanRenewalAu- thorityreceivedthe CivicAwardfor their efforts and successes mhtstor- ic downtownGolden. Rose Anne Jones received the Charlie O'Brien Award for the many years of her efforts with the Golden Fine Arts Festival, which is one of the best art festi- vais in the country. Epilog Cor- poration received the Business Interesting f POSTED BYWHEAT RIDGE HISTORICAL SOCIETY Researched by charlotte whetsel, n~o~:Aent Photo posted by swheatley Bowles, Jayne Byl and Sue Young prepare for the Gary Wink, Carol Ann r ,pater Golden Chamber Anuual Meeting. oftheYearAward. Recognition was also given to n to the Ambassador of the Year, ing directors and volunteers. The Greater Golden Chamber of Commerce is an organization Of about held together by membership in the organization, volunteers of the organization and the staff oversee- an ing its operations - Gary ~ Carol Arm Bowles, Jayne Ill SueYoung. ginger mansion entforthose sign element often used in floral design. The Mansion is built on a hill. t The earliestpictureswehave mthe Furthexreseazchbythewneai Wheat Ridge News, Sept. 1; 1914, }lidgeI3istoricalSocietyhasuncov- showthehousewasonginallybuilt outofbrick, probabh ws thThe e 1a- ered some interesting facts about picture in our file shows the man tlie O]ingerMarlslon, builtin1914. sionwaspaintedwhite. The home is a prairie style Thecaray ede ing, the t~_ house intheschool of Frank Lloyd Wright, Designers of this styleal- "Last Saturday evening, most always had. a connection p upon t Club held a lawn Par. with Mr. Wright. His first prairie ry upon the grounds of Geo. W. Ond She country home. W Wadsworth) 29th style design was in 1877, it was a smccohouse.Then mquefeatures dffee,sandwiches and ice cream outhelawrl.Around of the prairie style home are low were p rambling, ground hugging styles builtonlowhillsbuilt-uptoinsuxe the grounds from the trees were full height basements, horizontal . hungnumerousJapaneselanterns, lines and lows ofwindows with a which 'with thedisplayoffire light one story projection in the rear to made a most pleasing sight. In the give the house proportion-ade- ballroom musicbyvloJmandharp fu rished,entertalrlrrl Lhose at- who enjoyed dancing. ending voted Mr. Olinger a ro entertainer as well as a successful business man and artistic home builder" The Mansion is -being con sidered for Wheat Ridge Histoi Land mark designation. The fi pal decision by Wheat Ridge Ci Council will be made at7p. .Fel 23 incity Hall, m0 I - Kids donate. POSTED BYHUMANRIGITIS HumanRights.mymilehighnews.cc Donation to Habitat for E manity will help provide hous'. in keeping with the Univers al D laration of Human ghts" - organ, Anewhumane g le called lion for young p P Rocky Mountain Youth for man Rights Club raised $501 donate to the Habitat for Hun ity Katrina Fund. Youth Le: Devyn Isaacson and membe the dub presented their done toAmanda Landon onWedne at the metro Denver office of: itat for Humanity yal The Rocky Mountain 5 for Human Rights Club first nized in the fall of2005just I Hurricane Katrina hit* e' to I _ members had planned I carwash to raise money fol c c activities, but when the de y tion of Katrina became aPF b they decided to raise the i if to help people who had lo; the nd- homes in the hurricane. the councilvotesto deny mark designation, the Mansion and 1897 farm house and barn alongwith the 1969 chapelwillbe a com- scraped and replacedwith mercial center. Please contact president Char- lotte Wbetsel at 303-423-0989 or Claudia Worth at 303 467-0023 for furtherinformation. "Human rights begtr each one of us, said gout er, Devyn Isaacson, and decided to donate to Hat Humanity in keeping-witk 25 of the Universal Decl of Human Rights." Artlc the Universal Declaration man Rights states every Now you're making news••• Visit www•mVm11ehighnews.c011 to post your own stories, photos, events and even get your own blog. LIVE IT > SHARE IT > READ IT N11eR1 News.~om M CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: January23, 2006 Page -3 Item 3. PUBLIC HEARING ON 2005-2006 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT ALLOCATION (CDBG). Mayor DiTullio opened the public hearing. Item 3 was introduced by Mrs. Rotola. Ms. Anderson read the executive summary. Barbara Delgadillo, Assistant to the City Manager, presented the staff report. She updated Council that the County has brought jurisdictional allocation to $336,059.00. Mayor closed the public hearing. Motion by Mrs. Rotola to award the City's final 2006-2007 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) jurisdictional allocation for Phase III of the street and pedestrian improvements of an area bounded by 46th Avenue and 1-70, Estes through Carr Streets; seconded by Mr. Schulz; carried 8-0. - Item 4. A REQUEST FOR HISTORICAL LANDMARK DESIGNATION FOR PROPERTY ZONED RESIDENTIAL-TWO (R-2) LOCATED AT 7495 W. 29TH AVENUE. (CASE NO. WHL-05-01) PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED FROM JANUARY 9, 2006 Mayor DiTullio asked that every person intending to speak on this item, including staff, stand up and swear to tell the truth in this matter. Alan White, Community Development Director, presented the staff report. He entered into the record an e-mail that was sent to some members of Council. Charlotte Whetsel, 8770 W. 38th Avenue, updated Council on behalf of the applicant, the Wheat Ridge Historical Society. Michael Sheldon, 5290 DTC Parkway, attorney for the property owner, testified in opposition to the application. The following people spoke in support of the application: Ed Eastman, 2900 Vance Street Marty Cahill, 2600 Quay Street Roily Sorrentino, 4175 Teller Street Ruth Schultz, 3830 Garrison Street Annette Temorio, 3050 Webster Street CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: January 23, 2006 Page -4- Barbara St. John, 3480 Everitt Street, submitted petitions of support. Mary Mills, 2945 Upham Street (also spoke at the previous meeting) Marty Green, 7385 W. 28th Avenue Jill Blasco, 3045 Vance, submitted petitions to City Council of mostly people outside of Wheat Ridge. Janelle Shaver, 8890 W. 35th Avenue, submitted petitions of approximately 145 signatures. It was easy to get the petitions and people were eager to sign. Their comments included fond memories from many years ago regarding their associations with the property; they asked that Council should preserve the area's landmarks whether or not they are historical landmarks; consider the public good, not just what is in the interest of private enterprise and revenue to the. City; a speaker asked all those that supported the application stand; a number of people stood; he also asked that those in opposition stand and there were no individuals that stood; they would like the area to remain the same; the property balances the cemetery beautifully; it would be great to keep 26th Avenue to 32"a Avenue as it is because of traffic; feel that there is an underlying bias for the property owner. Council questions and comments followed. Claudia Worth, 4650 Oak Street, representing the applicant, was present to answer Councilmembers' questions. Mayor DiTullio closed the public hearing. . Motion by Mr. Womble to continue Case No. WHL-05-01 for action only at the City Council meeting on February 27, 2006, to enable staff, the applicant and the property owner to discuss options for preservation or re-use of portions of the property, with the consent of the property owner; seconded by Mr. Schulz. Mr. Gokey made a Substitute Motion to approve Case No. WHL-05-01, a nomination for historic landmark designation for the entire property located at 7495 W. 29th Avenue, for the following reasons: 1. The site is associated with a person prominent in the community in the past. 2. The farmhouse and barn exemplify the broad cultural and social history of the community. 3. The farmhouse and barn embody characteristics of an architectural style of the late 19th Century. 4. The pergola is a rare example of an architectural type in the community. 5. The Historical Society recommends the site be designated as an historical landmark. Seconded by Mr. Womble; tied 4-4 with Councilmembers Adams, Rotola, Berry and Schulz voting no; failed 5-4 with Mayor DiTullio voting no to break the tie. Original motion to continue carried 8-0. Page 1 of 2 Pam Anderson From: KLPA@comcast.net Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 4:24 PM To: Pam Anderson Subject: FW: Olingers site THIS CAME IN ON DAY OF COUNCIL ...SHOULD IT BE IN PACKET OR SINCE ALL ARE COPIED ARE WE O.K.....NO LENA ON COPY??? Forwarded Message: From: "Mary Uhl" <mary@catinc,net> To: khberry26@hotmail.com, t.womble@comcast.net, egokey@comcast.net, sangjw@netzero.net, klpa@comcast.net, BFTireCo@aol.com, councilorschulz@comcast.net Subject: Olingers site Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:42:56 +0000 I am writing to you today to express my opinion about the proposed historical designation of the Olinger Site located on 29th and Wadsworth. As a resident of Wheat Ridge and a property owner I am shocked that Wheat Ridge is considering historical designation on a property that has not been brought to the city council by the owners, but by "concerned citizens". There are so many beautiful buildings in this city, why is this one being singled out? There is a wonderful home for sale on 29th that boasts "oldest house in Wheat Ridge": - why not that house? Because that property is not being considered for rezoning. If Olingers was located next to Safeway or King Soopers on a preexisting retail site, I don't believe that this issue would have ever come up. The Olingers property is a great opportunity for the city to gain some much needed tax dollars and improve the Wadsworth corridor. The new owners have outlined some good ideas and they seem to be interested in protecting the privacy of the closest neighbors. The demolition of an older farm house and barn (not something that is a rare site in Wheat Ridge) and a crumbling walkway do not seem to be that much of a loss. The Olingers building, though old, is not the jewel of Wheat Ridge. It is neither the best nor the brightest that the city has to offer. If we are, as a community, prepared to write and preserve our history, we should look to those prepared to make that commitment. Not to those that are trying to help us upgrade our city and raise our tax base. I suggest that if Wheat Ridge is serious about preserving its history, that we open the doors to those that do own, live and work in historical buildings and make the process easy and streamlined. Who better to understand what is and isn't worth saving than those who know these properties best - the owners. It would also be the owner(s) that would caretake these properties and ensure that Wheat Ridge retains its historical value for years to come. Please understand that I am absolutely against preserving the Olinger site unless it is coming from the owners of the property. I do not believe that it is in the best interest of Wheat Ridge to 1/23/2006 Page 2 of 2 force anyone to retain buildings on their property without their consent. Also, I believe that changing the Olinger property to multi-use will be, in the long term, a benefit to both the community and the neighborhood. Thank you for your time, Mary A. Flos 1/23/2006 fof wNea, ITEM NO ~ _ REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION , c'O p COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 23, 2006 TITLE: A REQUEST FOR HISTORICAL LANDMARK DESIGNATION FOR PROPERTY ZONED RESIDENTIAL-TWO (R-2) LOCATED AT 7495 W. 29T' AVENUE (CASE NO. WHL-05-01) ® PUBLIC NEARING ❑ BIDS/MOTIONS ❑ RESOLUTIONS Quasi-Judicial: Yes ❑ ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING ❑ ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING No Community Development Director EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: City ManaA~f This public hearing was continued from January 9, 2005 in order for staff, the landowner and Historical Society to discuss a compromise regarding the designation of the property as an historic landmark. The Wheat Ridge Historical Society has submitted the landmark designation request. The landowner has filed an objection to the designation. Under the provisions of the Zoning and Development Code, approval of historic landmark designation requires a three-fourths majority vote of the entire Council if an objection is filed by the landowner. If the landmark designation is approved, the existing structures can not be demolished or physically altered without approval of a landmark alteration permit. Major alteration permits require approval of City Council. The Wheat Ridge Historical Society recommended approval of the historical landmark designation at a public hearing held on December 14, 2005. COMMISSION/BOARD RECOMMENDATION: The Wheat Ridge Historical Society recommended approval of the designation at a public hearing held on December 14, 2005. STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES: Staff, the landowner representative, and representatives of the Historical Society met on January 17th. The Historical Society reiterated their position of designating the entire site. The landowner representative offered to save structures if the property owner were compensated, or donate structures to the Society to move them, or sell portions of the site to others. The Historical Society informed the group that they do not have land on to which to move the structures; the Baugh House property cannot be used. The Historical Society does not have any funding to move structures or acquire property, including purchasing any portion of the subject property. No compromise was reached at the meeting. The historic significance evaluation conducted for the City concluded that the property is not eligible for national designation because the property is not intact or significant enough to qualify, nor is it eligible without landowner consent. The property is not eligible for state recognition without landowner consent. Designation of the site will affect future redevelopment opportunities. Preservation of all existing structures at their current locations restricts the options for development. If designated as an historic landmark, any future development of the site would be a major alteration, requiring approval by City Council. Designation of the site is contrary to recommendations of the Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy concerning the redevelopment of the Wadsworth Corridor. For the following reasons, designation of the property as an historic landmark is not appropriate: The site has been altered over time with the construction of parking lots and drive aisles and the construction of a garage more recently. 2. The historic designation under the application submitted may affect the ability of the owner to retain a reasonable return on the property. 3. The Olinger house does not represent a particular architectural type indicative of a period, style, method of construction or use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship, nor is it a notable work of an identified master builder, designer or architect. 4. Although the pergola represents a unique architectural type, portions of the pergola structure have been replaced by non-historic materials. 5. The Chapel was constructed in 1969. 6. The property owner does not consent to the designation. Most of the testimony at the previous hearing centered on the significance of the Olinger House and the pergola. Very little testimony was given concerning the farm house and barn. Individual structures, not including the Chapel and garage, may be eligible for local landmark designation. The application filed by the Historical Society is for designation of the entire site. Council does not have the option of designating one or more structures as historic landmarks according to the City Attorney. The City Attorney has opined that, because of the requirement to hold a public hearing within 45 days from the date of the Historical Society recommendation, Council must conclude the public hearing at this meeting. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: 1. Approve the landmark designation application. 2. Do not approve the landmark designation application. Staff recommends the historic landmark designation not be approved. FINANCIAL IMPACT: There are no review fees collected for the processing of this application. There will be no direct monetary impact to the City if the request is approved. Redevelopment and any subsequent revenue gains to the City may be impacted by the landmark designation. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to DENY Case No. WHL-05-01, a nomination for historic landmark designation for the entire property located at 7495 W. 29`h Avenue, for the following reasons: The site has been altered over time with the construction of parking lots and drive aisles and the construction of a garage more recently. 2. The historic designation under the application submitted may affect the ability of the owner to retain a reasonable return on the property. 3. The Olinger house does not represent a particular architectural type indicative of a period, style, method of construction or use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship, nor is it a notable work of an identified master builder, designer or architect. 4. Although the pergola represents a unique architectural type, portions of the pergola structure have been replaced by non-historic materials. 5. The Chapel was constructed in 1969. 6. The property owner does not consent to the designation. I further move to direct staff to offer to continue the dialog with the landowner to explore alternatives for preserving structures on the site, particularly the Olinger House and pergola, with any preservation alternative to meet with the landowner's approval" OR, "I move to APPROVE Case No. WHL-05-01, a nomination for historic landmark designation for the entire property located at 7495 W. 29w Avenue, for the following reasons: 1. The site is associated with a person prominent in the community in the past. 2. The farmhouse and bam exemplify the broad cultural and social history of the community. 3. The farm house and bam embody characteristics of an architectural style of the late 19`h Century. 4. The pergola is a rare example of an architectural type in the community. 5. The Historical Society recommends the site be designated as an historical landmark." Report Prepared by: Alan White (303-235-2844) Attachments: 1. Application by WRHS 2. Resumes of Messrs. Olsen and Marmor Community Development Department NEMIMME City of Wheat Ridge Date determined "eligible" 7500 W. 29" Avenue Ordinance # Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Date Recorded Property Name (Historic and/or ; 41 L zki tionship to Owner:. 4 ~P ! his aa,ypf NA • PUBLIC, ' O ~OF COL0~6' 20A6- Subscribed and sworn to ary rumlc commission expires /~6 Q6o NameN.c 4E W "T~a~d Y-{y, LL(- ~y1/tCOf°g'asa ~`~/1Gl Phone: =j C.3 -a 2l - 1 Oo 0 Address: ZOO Sp;'tti... 4-Zo0 C:~e r\rPtr f 0 -Z, 30 Signature of Owner Does ❑ Does not Signature of Owner M.si Cafe or : Ownership: uilding ❑ Public (CStructure fjl-Priy2te .Site ❑ Object ,consent to designation. Status: O i d Present Use: ccup e ❑ Commercial ❑ Entertainment ❑.Unoccupied ❑ Educational ❑ R li i ❑ Govern ent M e g ous ,Other: z t ta..,r 6 r t{ ❑ Residential Ck~.'? ATTACHMENT I LOCAL HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION NOMINATION FORM Please type/print and complete all entries. Date: Existing Designation: ❑ National Register ❑ State Register Arc 'tectural: epresents notable work of master builder, designer or architect Dombodies distinguishing characteristics of an architectural type, period, style or method of construction *fmbodies distinguishing characteristics of indigenous materials or craftsmanship Historical: dentified with historic persons Identified with important events in national, state or local history Other: Exemplifies or reflects cultural, economic or social history of the nation. Recommend as historic landmark by Wheat Ridge Historical Society Further Comments: 4 y t. rne, y'r., Y (Add a separate sheet of paper if needed.) RkQ 4 Please attach a narrative of the historical significance of the property. Include a title search if the property is important for its association with a significant person. Further fftR-'`YET f°.. Construction Date: Architect/Builder: Building Materials: rl r• L Architectural Style: Special Featu (Add a separate sheet of paper if needed. Please include photos of each elevation of the structure.) Describe any additions to the property: F F-ice. N~~ } U A G c f C E i!~ r -,,A (Add a separate sheet of paper if needed.) Attach photographs and other documentation which supports historic landmark designation. Rev. 11/03/05 3 OAHP1403 determination Rev, 12/97 Colorado Official eligibility Cultural Resource Survey Historic Architectural Survey Form 1. State site number: 5JF.1392 2. Temporaray state number: 3. County: Jefferson 4. City: Wheat Ridge - 5. Historic building name: George Olinger house 6. Current building name: Olinger Mortuary 7. Building address: 7595 W. 29th Av.; Wheat Ridge, CO 80215 B. Owner name and address: Colorado Mortuaries, Inc., P.O. Box, Houston TX Geographic information 9. P.M. 6th Township 3 South - Range 69 West SW 1/4 of SW 1/4 of NW 1/4 of SE 1/4 of section 26 10. UTM reference - Zone 13 Basting 493120 Northing 4400790 11. USGS quad name: Arvada, Colo. Year: 1965 PR 1980 Map scale x 7.5' 15' Attach photo copy of approriate map section. 12. Lot (s): West 1/2 lot 3 Block: 1 Addition: Barth Subdivsion Year of Addition: 1882 13. Boundary Description and justification: 69-03-26-064800-01-03 This structure is located on the above described lot. Architectural Description 14. Building plan (footprint, shape): rectangular 15. Dimensions in feet: Length x Width 16. Number of stories: 2 17. Primary external wall material (s) (enter no more than two): Brick 18 Roof configuration (enter no more than one): Hipped 19. Primary external roof material (enter no more than one): Tile (OAHP use only) Date Initials Determined Eligible"- MR Determined Not Eligible-MR Determined Eligible - SR Determined Not Eligible-SR Need Data Contributes to eligible MR District Noncontributing to eligible NR District 0AHP1403, page 2 Site number: SJP.1392 20. Special features (enter all that apply): This structure consists of two major components. The portion on the west is the George Olinger house, built in 1914 as a single dwelling and converted in the.1970s into a mortuary. The portion on the east was constructed in the 1970s as a mortuary and was designed to match the architectural features of the Olinger house. There is a covered portico in front of the east building for funeral car loading. The west building is built elevated above street level and has a stairway leading down to W. 29th Ave. The south wall of the house has numerous windows on either side of the center front entry door. 21. General architectural description: The two buildings are conjoined to form a single unit but with very different details and methods of con- struction. The west building, a former single dwelling, has numerous windows and entry doors on the south and east walls. There is a garage built into the lower level of the west wall at the north end of the building. Grade changes allow a formal front entry on the south side of the building and a rear entry on the north side of the building. The entire west building is constructed using bricks painted white. The east building is taller and features four large windows on both the east and west walls. It does use similar white painted bricks but over a steel beam construction method. A drive through portico is adjacent to the south wall of the east building. 22. Architectural style/building type: - Commercial 23. Landscaping or special setting features: There is an extensive lawn in the south (front) and west (side) yards. There is a large asphalt paved parking area in the north yard and an asphalt paved driveway in the east (side) yard extending from 29th Ave. to the parking lot. The lot features numerous mature trees throughout the grounds including parking areas. Included are nine large oak trees lined parallel to 29th Ave. and to Wadsworth Blvd. There is a pergola on the west property line adjacent to Wadsworth Blvd. There is statuary in the Classical Greek tradition in the front yard. There is a concrete sidewalk, curb and gutter on Wadsworth but the lawn extends to the aspalt of W. 29th Ave. in the front yard. 24. Associated buildings, features, or objects: There is the caretakers' dwelling located at the northwest corner of the lot with a street address of 2960 Wadsworth Blvd. This'structure is a one and one-half story wood_ siding dwelling with front gable roof. Due to regrading of Wadsworth Blvd. in about 1959 this house now sits below Wadsworth. Associated with the structure is a garage or storage building at W. 30th Av. and Webster St. Jefferson County assessor lists caretakers' dwelling as constructed in 1892. Parcels within Barth Subdivision were known to have been rented prior to their first recorded sales, so this date appears reasonable. Onr+v, page 3 Site number: 5JF.1392 The pergola was an integral feature of the landscaping of the Olinger residence when it was constructed in 1914. Vines and other plants covered the 300 foot long pergola for many years providing.a shady walkway for both residents and pedestrians alike. Originally the Rocky Mountain Ditch lateral was located on the east side of Wadsworth near the structure... Since the 19705 there has been no vines but the structure remains and some restoration work has been done. Architectural History 25. Date of Construction:' Estimate Actual 1914 Source of information: Jefferson county assessors records. Wheat Ridge News (published copies at Wheat Ridge Historic Park) 26. Architect: _ Unknown - Source of information Not available 27. Builder/Contractor: Unknown Source of information: Not available 28. Original owner: George Olinger Source of information: Jefferson County assessors index; Newspaper articles 1914-1916, 29. Construction history (include description and dates of major additions, alterations or demolitions): The west part of the building was constructed in 1914 and was the home of George W. and Margaret Olinger. The house included living quarters and formal entertainment facilities. In the 1920 property tax assessment roll, the. Olinger house is one of the most valuable in Wheat Ridge. There may have been an addition at the north end of the building while it was a residence or it may have been added during construction of the adjacent mortuary. The mortuary was constructed in 1970 at which time the residential quarters were assimilated into the mortuary operation. 30. R Original location Date of move(s) Moved Historical Associations 31. Original use(s): single dwelling (suburban estate) 32. Intermediate use(s): 33. Current use(s): Commercial (mortuary) 34. Site type(s): Neighborhood commercial site QAHP1403, page 4 Site number: 5JF.1392 35. Historical background: This site was originally part of the AsahelzBeach 160 acre pre-emption which was purchased by Moritz and William Barth-in: 1872 and was platted as Barth Subdivision in 1882.-Simon Brown is the first identified purchaser of the ten acres described as Lot 3 Block 1. Parcels within Barth subdivision were rented prior to purchase, but indi- vidual renters of particular parcels have not been identified. George W. Olinger purchased the West,half of lot 3 on March 1, 1911. The house was built in 1914. At the time Olinger was manager of. his family's mortuary at 16th and Boulder Streets. This house is one of four Olinger-owned parcels along West 29th Ave.: the mortuary (1908), Olinger Gardens subdivision . (1919), the house (1914) and Crown Hill Cemetery (1907). Olinger also developed Welshire, Bonne Brae and Indian Hills subdivisions:. 36. Sources of information: Jefferson county assessors index; 'Olinger' family newspaper clipping file at Wheat Ridge Historic Park library; Thomas Noel, Denver: Rocky Mountain Gold, p. 223. Samuel Johnson, Auto- biography. Significance: 37. Local, landmark designation: yes R no Date of designation: Designating authority: 38. Applicable National Register Criteria: A. Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad pattern of our history. % B. Associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. R C. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or _ D. Has yielded, or may be likely to yield; information important in history or prehistory. Qualifies under Criteria Consideration A through G (see Manual) Does not meetany -of the above National Register criteria 39. Area(s) of significance: Significant person, 40. Period of significance: 1914-1940 41. Level of significance: Local (Wheat Ridge) and metropolitan (Denver) 42. Statement of significance: George W. Olinger made several significant contributions to the development of Wheat Ridge including his initial investment in Crown Hill Cemetery in 1907 and his development of Olinger Gardens at 29th and Sheridan in 1919. Later, following his death, the Olinger mortuary expanded its operations to this site. Olinger developed the Denver-area's largest mortuary business. His house was built to re- fleet his rising status in the Denver community. Both the construction methods and the landscaping features make this house stand out among Wheat Ridge residential structures. OAHP1403, page 5 Site number: 5JF.1392 43. Assessment of historic physical integrity related to significance: Despite conversion from a residence to a commercial use the west building constructed in 1914 retains its original exterior features. The newer east building uses architectural elements such as roofline and use of windows to establish a uniform appearance to the site. Continued maintenance of the landscaping and pergola contribute to the site's significance. National Register Eligibility Assessment 44. National Register eligibility field assessment: R Eligible Not Eligible Need D 45. Is there National Register district potential? yes E no Discuss: Most of the older structures associated with Crown Hill Cemetery are no longer standing such as the offices, maintenance, facilities and green house. The National Register Tower of Memories is one-half miles west of the Olinger house and mortuary. Due to architectural style and - adjacent land use differences with nearby residential structures, this structure would not contribute to a National Register district. 46. If there is National Register district potential, is this building Contributing Noncontributing Recording Information 47. Photograph numbers: Negative filed at: Wheat Ridge Historic Park, 4610 Robb St., Wheat Ridge 48. Report title: Wheat Ridge Historic Structure Survey.1998-1999 49. Date(s): February 24, 1998 50. Recorder(s):Robert J. Olson 51. Organization: Wheat Ridge Historical Society 52. Address: P.O. Box 1833, Wheat Ridge, CO 80034-1833 53. Phone number(s): 303-421-9111 (office) or 303-433-6097 (home) Colorado Historical Society, Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation 1300 Broadway, Denver, CO 80203, (303) 866-3395 VA +73 dog, Yl.Cdv~i~~'i ~'h 1Z-14-c7<~' Olinger Mansion 7495 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge Colorado A structure may be eligible for National/State Register designation if it is over 50 years old and meets one of the following criteria: Is this structure architecturally significant. 1. This house is certainly larger and more impressive than surrounding residential structures. 2. The architects or contractors have not been identified. 3. The residential portion (west) was built in 1914 4. There was an earlier residential structure now located at the north end of lot. 5. There was an arbor built along Wadsworth which still stands. 6. There was a landscaping element south and southwest of the front entry. Is this structure associated with persons (or institutions) which made significant, contributions to the community. George Washington Olinger (1882-1954) 1. 'George Olinger was owner or manager of Olinger Mortuaries, 1901 to 1940's which was located at 15th and Platte (1890-1909) or 1600 Boulder St. (1909-1999). 2. He was a principal in Associated Industries, which developed Bonnie Brae (Denver), Olinger Gardens (Wheat Ridge) and Indian Hills (Jefferson County) 3. He was a principal in Crown Hill Cemetery (1907) and other memorial parks. 4. He was a principal in building Tower of Memories (a National Landmark) 5. He was founder of Highland Boys youth organization 1916 until I940's. 6. He provided the first mass transit in Wheat Ridge (circa 1910's). 7. He was a founding member and officer of Colorado Funeral Directors Assoc. 8. He was a founding member and officer of American Funeral Directors Assoc. 9. He provided quality, affordable housing for his employees in 1919 at Olinger Gardens Subdivision. 10. He supported the fine arts through the Olinger Quartet, the Olinger organists and other musical groups. 11. He was an early advocate of "planned needs" in the funeral business, providing a financial model for individuals to plan their own funeral/death activities. 12. He was an early advocate of the "memorial park" which was aesthetically . pleasing and carefully designed to replace "burial grounds" Frances Vanderber 1. Frances Vanderher was a principal in Olinger Mortuaries, Crown Hill Cemetery, Tower of Memories. 2. Vanderber was son-in-law of George W. Olinger, and carried out many of his business and philanthropic endeavors. Olinger Mortuaries 1. Olinger Mortuaries was founded by John and Emma Olinger in 1890 at 15th and Platte Sts. They later constructed a modern mortuary at 1600 Boulder St. (1909-1999). 2. In 1969, an addition was constructed east of the Olinger family home and the entire complex became a full service mortuary. 3. By 1986 Service Corporation International purchased Olinger Mortuaries, Crown Hill Cemetery and other assets. 4. Jefferson County Open Space purchased portions of Crown Hill for open space and park purposes. 5. Olinger Gardens was a large employer of Wheat Ridge and Denver area workers (see Olinger Gardens Subdivision). Associated Industries 1. Served as a real estate development and financial arm of the Olinger business enterprises, planning, constructing and developing Bonnie Brae (Denver), Olinger Gardens (Wheat Ridge); and Indian Hills (Jefferson County) 2. Involved in numerous other business activites. Crown Hill Cemetery 1. In about 1907 George Olinger arranged to purchase about 150 acres of land from Henry Lee (later expanded to about 230 acres). In about 1908 burials began in Crown Hill Cemetery, both from Olinger and other mortuaries. 2. Crown Hill featured the landscaped architecture associated with memorial gardens rather than "burial ground" design used in earlier cemeteries. 3. Crown Hill featured "perpetual maintenance" and acquired water rights on the Rocky Mountain Ditch and water storage rights in Crown Hill Lake. 4. Crown Hill Cemetery was a large employer of Wheat Ridge area workers. Olinger Gardens Subdivision 1. Is located between Sheridan and Fenton Streets and 29th and 32°d Avenues. It was purchased by Olinger business interests from Moses Hallett estate (which acquired it from James W. Richards family). 2. It provided quality, affordable housing for the workers in various Olinger family businesses and others. Mass Transit 1. Olinger family businesses constructed and operated a street car line from 29th and Yates past Wadsworth into Crown Hill Cemetery sometime around 1910. 2. This line provided funeral cars, employee transportation, and general public transportation connecting with Denver Transit Company lines inside Denver. 3. Continued to operate a shuttle bus after the street car lines were taken out. Service Corporation International 1. Many Olinger family business enterprises were acquired during the 1980's. 2. This company plays a pivotal role in consolidation of the mortuary and cemetery business enterprises in North America. 3. The consolidation may now be affecting these potentially historical structures. w j y t t~ fi H 3 r. ~r 0 ® T. y W CD fD ' L1., (D 7 J I yi Y n O 0 Ii L~l ~v t III II ~I 0 fB w a C.6 January 17, 2006 Members of Wheat Ridge City Council Wheat Ridge City Manager Wheat Ridge Planning Department Dear members of Wheat Ridge leadership: At the January 9 city council meeting members of the Wheat Ridge Historical Society involved in the Historic Preservation application for the Olinger mansion at 7495 West 29`h Avenue were requested to submit professional qualifications for consideration in the case. Herewith are the qualifications for Robert Olson. Education Attended Jefferson County Public Schools K-12 including Lumberg Elementary., 7 h Grade Junior, Wheat Ridge Junior and Jefferson Senior High schools graduating from Jefferson in 1970 Attended Adams State College in Alamosa and graduated Cum Laude with a Bachelors of Art degree in 1975 and majors in history and journalism Attended Metropolitan State College in Denver. I took business administration, cost accounting and management classes 1976-1979. No degree sought. 1 Attended University of Colorado at Denver. Graduate level public history (i.e., governmental, museum or other nonacademic history) classes, 1984t-198q, including United States, Colorado and Denver history, archives management, an internship at the National Archives Denver branch and independent study under Drs. Thomas Noel and Lee Scamehom. No degree sought. Local history and historic site seminars, workshops and continuing education classes, Colorado Historical Society, US Department of interior, and others, 1981-2004 Employment/Volunteer activities (related to history) Wheat Ridge Historic Park, 1981-date. Activities include tours; accessions; research on historical properties, educational and cultural institutions; and serving as curator. All unpaid Wheat Ridge Historical Society. Offices include president, treasurer and board of directors, all unpaid Elitch Gardens Amusement Park. I served as unofficial company historian, 1978-1985. Regis University Dayton Memorial Library. I am currently writing a series of articles for various University publications. Non-historical employment, (1970-2006) includes Elitch Gardens Company, Mark VII Equipment, Quality Education Data and Regis University, where I a currently the book buyer. ATTACHMENT 2 Historical projects Liaison from Wheat Ridge Historical Society on Design Advisory Group or other advisory groups including Jefferson County Public Schools; Prospect Valley, Lumberg, Wilmore Davis and Edgewater elementary; Wheat Ridge middle; and Wheat Ridge and Jefferson high schools. Internship at National Archives including arrangement, description, and preservation of maps Historic Building Survey of over 200 pre-1919 residential and commercial structures within the cities of Wheat Ridge, Lakeside and Mountain View for Colorado Historical Society (this in- cludes the primary survey document cited by the Wheat Ridge Historical Society, the evaluation consultant the city hired on the Olinger site and others) Research associate for Dr. Thomas Noel on his 1997 book by Oxford University Press The Buildings of Colorado. Curator for the material donated by the City of Wheat Ridge to the Wheat Ridge Historical Society including city council minutes, tapes, support documentation; boards and commissions material; and city staff material Jefferson County school history research project. This involves extensive and ongoing research on Wheat Ridge and Jefferson county public and private schools. Jefferson County cultural and religious institutions project. This involves ongoing esearch on businesses, churches, civic associations and community organizations. I was appointed as City Historian for the city of Wheat Ridge. The duties have included advising city management, city departments, and the city council. Since 1996 there have been numerous and ongoing consultations for Public Works, Planning, Parks, City Manager, Mayor, City Council and individual City council members. Publications Four articles published in Historically Jeffco, the peer-reviewed historical publication of Jefferson County (three of the submissions were award winning on Wheat Ridge High School, Lakeside Amusement Park, and Adolph Coors Company) The History of the Sentinel Newspaper I have written several local history brochures, pamphlets and non-scholarly articles. Editor and publisher of The Chronicle newspaper, 1994-2002. Work included numerous articles dealing with history, historic preservation, and historic structures I am presently working a book length manuscript on Elbert County Colorado history The above is a true and accurate recitation of my record. Submitted for January 23 city council meeting. artl~(a~ ~ Education B.A., Cultural Anthropology, University of California, Santa Barbara, 1987 M.A., Public History and Historic Preservation, 1989 Professional AfTiliatfons Society for Historical Archaeology Registration Colorado Archaeological Permit #2004-33 Background Mr. Marmor has sixteen years of experience in cultural resource management and historic preservation consulting for transportation, utility corridor, and mineral development projects throughout the western United States. His experience includes studies and documentation required for compliance with NEPA, Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, and Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act. Mr. Marmor has completed a wide range of projects involving inventories, significance and impact assessments, mitigation, and the development of historic preservation plans. Mr. Marmor joined Felsburg, Holt & Ullevig in 2003. Northwest Corridor EIS Mr. Manor's role in this complex Environmental Impact Statement involves coordination of the cultural and paleontological resources investigations, and the inventory of historic architectural resources along multiple alternative transportation corridors extending between Golden and Broomfield. Numerous rural and agricultural properties were recorded, as well as canals. Significant resources identified for avoidance include the Ralston Community Church, a false front rural grocery store, two early 20th century farmhouses and barns, and the site of the Golden Fire Brick Company manufacturing plant. Historic Preservation Survey, Loveland Colorado This grant-funded project involved a reconnaissance-level historic resource survey of the City of Loveland's 90 square mile Area of Community Influence, as well as an intensive-level inventory of 100 historic commercial and residential buildings in the City's core area. The reconnaissance survey resulted in the field recording and data collection of 2,356 historic properties identified by Assessor's records as well as visual inspection. The intensive-level survey provided the basis for formation of two historic districts. Fort Collins, Colorado Central Business District Inventory Mr. Marmor was contracted by the City of Fort Collins to complete an intensive-level survey of 100 commercial, industrial, and residential properties centered around the historic central business district (adjacent to of the existing Old Town Historic District). The report provided significance assessments for each property as well as comparative data and recommendations for the establishment of a new historic commercial district along College Avenue. Lakewood Housing Project Historical Impact Assessment Mr. Marmor was hired by the City of Lakewood (Colorado) Housing Authority to assess potential indirect (visual and noise) impacts from planned construction of a new low-cost housing complex, to the historic Jewish Consumptives' Relief Society campus, which is listed on the National Registerof Historic Places. Mr. Marmor worked closely with the project's architect's and the State Historic Preservation Office to determine the placement, orientation, and massing of the proposed multi-story buildings in order to minimize the impact to the former tuberculosis sanitarium. Page 1 REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS: Jason D. Marmor Historic American Buildings Survey (NABS) Documentation of the University of Wyoming Campus and Library, Laramie, Wyoming To mitigate the impacts of proposed improvements on the University of Wyoming's architecturally distinctive campus, Mr. Marmor was engaged by the institution's Facilities Planning Office to prepare a detailed narrative of its historical development. Additionally, Mr. Marmor prepared detailed documentation of the University's monumental former library building, in advance of construction of a new botany greenhouse addition. Colorado Boulevard (Idaho Springs) Drainage Improvement Project Mr. Marmor was tasked with inventorying historical resources situated along a 2.5 mile stretch of Colorado Boulevard passing through the old mining town of Idaho Springs, Colorado. This investigation was required for compliance with Section 106, in conjunction with street improvements proposed by the Colorado Department of Transportation. The project involved a file search, a reconnaissance survey, and intensive-level recording of numerous historic roadside edge features, including flagstone sidewalks, stone and concrete retaining walls, wrought-iron fences, an early (1931) Federal Aid Highway Project marker post, and a "carriage step" rock. The survey identified significant features which contribute to the historic character of Idaho Springs and thereby warrant preservation. Valley Highway Environmental Impact Statement Mr. Marmor served as cultural resource specialist for an ambitious project sponsored by the Colorado Department of Transportation, to reconstruct and improve a 2.5 mile-long stretch of Interstate 25 through the heart of Denver, Colorado. The project involved a Class I file search, several reconnaissance surveys during development of the project's design alternatives, and a Class 111 intensive-level inventory of historical resources. He completed intensive-level documentation for 65 historical resources including. 59 previously unrecorded architectural properties, one grade separation structure and segments of five linear transportation features. Mr. Mannor also performed an evaluation of potential project impacts to significant historical features and parks protected by Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act. Inventory and Management Plan for the Historic Overland Trail through the Fort Collins (Colorado) Urban Growth Area Mr. Mannor was contracted by the City of Fort Collins to conduct comprehensive archival research followed by a field survey for remnants and sites associated with the historic Overland and Cherokee Trails, both significant 19th century stage and emigration routes. The archival research included a review of nearly 40 diaries, journals, and other firsthand accounts, and resulted in the identification of a complex web of trails that were later retraced. In conjunction with the survey, Mr. Marmor prepared a management plan to facilitate the protection and interpretation of these historic Page 2 Jason D. Marmor Ducks Unlimited Cultural Resource Survey Mr. Marmor assisted the Great Plains regional office of Ducks Unlimited, Inc. with cultural resource. compliance associated with this nonprofit organization's acquisition and planned wetland enhancement of a 343-acre parcel located along the South Platte River in rural Weld County, Colorado. The project area was considered archaeologically sensitive due to its location close to the Kersey Terrace, a locality that has in the past yielded evidence of very early Native American (Paleoindian) occupation. Intensive-level survey of the subject property resulted in the recording of two linear sites: the abandoned Union Pacific, Julesburg-LaSalle Branch line railroad, and the Empire Intake Canal. Huron Street Cultural Resources Survey To facilitate compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, Mr. Marmor completed an intensive-level cultural resources inventory of an Area of Potential Effect surrounding a 1.6 mile-long stretch of Huron Street proposed for improvement by the City of Westminster, Colorado. The project was associated with ongoing development in Westminster near the new 136th Avenue interchange on 1-25. The survey resulted in the recording of a segment of the historic Bull Canal, a small prehistoric site, and the ruins of an agricultural building complex. No significant resources were identified, and Section 106 clearance was obtained. Castle Rock Pipe Line Level II Documentation After exposed sections of an old wood stave water pipeline were discovered in a draw next to Douglas Road approximately two miles south of Castle Rock, during a cultural resource survey for the proposed Crystal Valley/Dawson Ridge interchange on 1-25, Mr. Marmor was hired to complete SHPO Level II Documentation. The 10" diameter pipeline carried water from East Plum Creek to the Town of Castle Rock from c.1916-1941.. This documentation, which included medium format back and white photography, a historical narrative, and maps showing the former route of this former municipal water supply system, was required to mitigate the disturbance of the buried pipeline. Cramer Farm Documentation On behalf of the Castle Rock Development Company, Mr. Marmor completed an intensive-level survey of the vacant Cramer Dairy Farm located northwest of Castle Rock off Hwy 85 in the Plum Creek Valley. Each major farm building.and feature was described, photographed, and mapped, and a historical summary and significance assessment were included. The documentation was required by the Town of Castle Rock prior to removal of the farm buildings. Page 3 Meredith Reckert From: Alan White Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 5:19 PM To: 'Gerald Dahl' Cc: Meredith Reckert; Randy Young Subject: Olingers Legal Questions Jerry, Mere and I met with Olingers owner and planner and as a result of that meeting I have several questions of a legal nature. They are making noise about legal action if the Council proceeds with historic designation unless they are somehow compensated. We may or may not hear some of these arguments at the next hearing. I know some of these may be answerable only by going to court, but I think we need to assess our exposure to legal action: 1. Would designation of the whole site as an historic landmark be a takings? Would the designation of structures (one or more) be a partial takings? How would we fare in court on either takings claim? 2. What is our exposure to legal action given the following sequence of events? A. The new owner bought the property without any historic designation, completed or pending. B. The new owner filed a rezoning application. C. WRHS filed an historical landmark designation application only after the rezoning application was filed by the landowner. D. We held the rezoning application in abeyance until a decision was made on the historic designation. 3. (Probably related to a takings claim.) Is designation of any structure or a portion of the site or the whole site inverse condemnation? 4. What influence, if any, does the Comp Plan have in the historic designation process? Alan White Community Development Director 303-235-2844 Lc) I J i No- . O Z V U) L CD O O N CD c~ C6 O U 4-0 U i O o 0 -N U ■ O o ~ ■O m J Z o~ U 0 4-1 m 0 0 0 ■ - L = c~ O 4-0 .U - 'U Q C: ~ o O U U) >1 ~U 4. O o 0 o O > oc 0 a~ a~ 0 a~ 0 0 LL O CN U AW L um 4-► CU V ~ C: 0 0 N U U) -t CU If CU CU Q O Q O > O ~Q CO U O C6 (a Q O U 4-a a) C6 E C~ ~ co O U V - O c m i O O ~ E 5) O 040 O m 0 U 70 Q 4-0 U U) 0 O O 0. A $ k 33 yX qa~~~~@ 2 mow rs Us Ono al, lf, -n a all zE" zs.i ~~ta x53 s < i I NN~yk~ nLro CM' BtlN a~ 17 ScA21 ~ y W„!~ 0 aA Y w 5 a an x .OBN. a¢YSi ~-fiV F~62 K3M ~ _ li S~9L ~Y 1trl rA,~ P fJ /1 S/ /J p 4 9 iii _ .rf/ /i d/ € V h ~ s} p ~ p / ✓ ~ t~Zt n0 Jf o r~) r J Ji 7J Jr J/ r _ J f r inn 'C.S ~ RaS r/ r.,a 4 s I/ (n ,=A l lJJ aE'Y(/~ C'/ rr~/r tF rrl l)/ J/// I !////'J g h IRA n /All / r ¢ IT, 'O r r/ ? ~O r r r, J / r r, , / 1/'Yr/J I V % j ~ IJ4 J / -5 'Ir 4{ /t O /r'r/i('3' ~ r s U i e I_ l~ r1, C ~a$ a y tl a f s Hi ' ~ s 8 d gm a Ek Fm $ d 9. , e_•Y bM U95U ~ 4 r S zx ° ~ `R XSt of b` ° 77 :8 n~ t 'will i wI ~A { I ~ f ; §y ' ROB ~ ~ ry ~ I E M1~~'' a ~h t g 3 ~ b ~g } I {II ` R 1»J I4 ~ -,0p-w e80ee o»L+ "-~f. d1 e ~ ~C~E 1~1 e `a I S 2, }a eg 43Y a E ° E .r 3 - Erc€~. Icon ° odor ,M 3 i rl o `o Y O ~ d ls F Ake? z. e ~ 'ilk. ~B Y w +w 3 O O O :Y O O c~ d F=a :Y O O a_.~axt<..~,. .`<o w: o ~ ~ ~ ~ M ~ - ~ 9ORY TMTJ Y.g+°^W * pax it '~'.{Y~iT f~yv~'..-' .A"Jvw . " , M ~tt m ni v.P 0 p§ x~ Y ai. v U_ E O O (a ~U) L _ (6 ~ U U O L V N to j CL a) : -Fz o ~ Q N ~ U O p 4-0 O O N E E O U O N O N N 12 06 O 4-0 m O 4-0 (D 4-A (6 O Q. O U) U 0 L 4-a Jc: O O (1) U Mm A-0 L O L Q U ~ U O U) L O O U U) O U O O O E O 4-0 U) N Q 4-0 Q Jc: U) m E U O U) CCf E 0 L Am-a .f.- O U) E N Co 0 C.) L O 4-0 O U O (a ry L N O 0 ~ N (D Jc: L ~ L to U) U) _ O . N D ~ w -Sa ~ 0 O VD c~a Z N m 4-0 U U p O U) O O 4-A CL c O O Q CL Q CO .0 (6 LO Jc: O ~ O N ~ O ~ O O ~ O c6 ~ ~ U 0.0 O 0 U) 4-0 ~ U X N U) U Q, O N O t6 ~ ~ o ca U) c~ 0 o Co cm o O O n U u. c6 C O C d E E O V co 4- O O Q E E 0 L J CO L O N co N L U 00 O 4-j 2 00.0 3: m O L Q O Q ~-a 0) O O a) .Co O (a O O Jc: E 4- O O U) n lr~ M O Q N O O 4- U) I..t~ N 4m O L O CL CL Cl) E cn Lle~ 0 am a O m 1W M~d L E J N 4-4 co 0 ~U O O N 4-A U O 4-0 .2) U) LO C~ U) O (6 O Al~ U) O 0 N LO U) O U) O Jc: N cn Q Q ~w gY;: `3 -s F:f h'. „;~.v~ We the undersigned support the preservation of and landmark designation effort for the Olinger property at 7495 W. 29th Avenue: 1 IName Address Si e Date 1 ~ L ~2 CwtJC 1E A O- 19A l M r ~'7 l~ 3 Ef L~EA1 4 0 1 Iz_IC4 ~6 7 we S 'Z i_$ 3o _U per- - = I Ir 9 e ~10 .7011q,s L) G~ / ?4los~ 1 G-r- 2 - - 13 14 r C t 97xr - Gel dBATE ~ - - 419 g t GQtJt J - ' ~ / ! k a b 16 - -_j jr I - / i 17 JF f ~ ~.ss w~~. f 18 _ E44r7,te- 19 - w d - is r~ a6 - 20 , j /a - 7 os 22 -23 I 2.,.~ 27 3035- J`- 28 P/f- uOtt n~. ci so Y'Yt" 57 29 30 - ~t? 31 ` Gl 32 33 34 Gf6XY, ~DO i/ I /~~/S~~DS G G V V ~4' £D 12 ~ lL~f lG • w-v L /wi✓ll.p L7-~ ~ CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California Jia, ~ l County of iC ss. On o G before me, J~-T? i) 0 (W S E~`>/ lV orx},¢,/ Date Name Title of Officer (e.g., "Jane Doe, Notary PublicV T personally appeared V f rV M u& N y r Name(s) of Signer(s) ' personally known to me 14V,oved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(9) whose narri is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that eEiil 0 klNSEiH he/she/they executed the same in his/hsr,*Wr C0mmi3sien # 1383063 authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/hedtheir qE Notary Public - CaliforNa n signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the Los Angeles County - entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, MY Comm.ExpiresNOV;,2p;X, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hoff' and seal. Place Notary Seal Above Signature of otary Public OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached D ument Title or Type of Document: E T/ Tl0 n.) Document Date: -./c;) y-- 05 Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer-Title(s): ❑ Corporate Officer-Title(s): ❑ Partner Limited ❑ General ❑ Partner - ❑ Limited ❑ General _ ❑ Attorney in Fact Top 0 11111021 of thumb here ❑ Attorney in Fact ' ❑ Trustee Top of thumb here' ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: Signer Is Representing: 0 2004 National Notary Association • 9350 Be Soto Ave., P.O. Box 2402 • Chatsworth, CA 91313-2402 Item No. 5907 Reorder Call Toll-Free 1-800-8]6-682] We the undersigned support the preservation of and landmark designation effort for the Olinger property at 7495 W. 29th Avenue: Name { N 1-' Address Signature Date 35 t 5 r 36 ` r~ ~ ce S7. Q JL Q, e 37 o .5 38 39 / al .?~7 S5 ~L7L/ 5- 40 ~ 9 3 a ✓p~ n A y- ~ - 41 -42 pW Ct~wIRUGOwSKI Jew 1'ey x,951 ~Arr 3oYo /~acs~ ST- 44 ~45 CLr as°° ~ s 30 3-Se > V a/a o 46 47 - 48 7 n a e S -6757 - - ~ - _ -4~ ~ - SJ SI B`/a 50 51 n Ad-w LSc-k 035 lxua S' ~ J~ j 5-, 52 53 - - 4 _ 1 ! , /~/jam / UJ L sa 1 55 r clt~2n 3 `J --LU/;,te r - /j ✓✓~~LLeM l a.9 73- a d- -J T _56+ 57 - -4 (~.(_r, 2 r2-Zl-c6S 58 59 dJ~ v%t7r~ 3Od ~ ~ 60 I - - - i'/y~hl I7- 5 _j 'ic~ Sl 3gol Cdr - Z Z_L-o 61 62 i Pfpl^~L~ ~c ~ 63 64 { / ~1t?S f I L66 67 , r /k( 2 ~TT~esFt n JaC.Cnrvwig-ng~ CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California i y Jt s. County of /1'a ~ritJ On o G before me,C77r U I NS~-Th! ~Jay7q~/ to 1 1 Name and Title of Officer (e.g., "Jane Doe, otary Public") personally appeared Name(s) of Signer(s) U-personally known to me zi ~ EErnJO f`JNSUH , COrnmisS C^ p i3Fy3i 16'j t 3.. .'.f v UGiIC, (-0ln(DrnQ ~j CIE OUliy if (j V, EN-proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(iq whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/9uee/t4ey executed the same in his/hexjth9j( authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. W T nd official seal. Place Notary Seal Above EZ ivy D Signature of tary Public OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required bylaw, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached DofY~ent Title or Type of Document: ~L•~t~ Tr i i d Document Date: I /b !g- Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer - Title(s): ❑ Partner -[I Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: RIMM Top of thumb here Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer -Title(s): _ ❑ Partner - ❑Limited ❑General ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: Top of thumb here 0 2004 National Notary Associa4on • 9350 De Soto Ave., P.O. Box 2402 • Chatswonh, CA 91313-2402 Item No. 5907 Reorder. Call Toll-Free 1-800-876-6827 A~P We the undersigned support the preservation of and landmark designation effort for the Olinger property at 7495 W. 29th Avenue: iName Address (Signature Date 69 70 r LV ~ Z - 7X15 at /L ZZ ~ 71 / 12, . 72 5 U7 73 ~74 rl~~t 73 -7nh /}z z a r~d~ 1 75 !V AV ?,9 Y L c /L Lz 76 ( ~ ~~~S A / I aLoL 78 79 nc ~Y r-_.T~~~ 1 zG V lz 1 /12C 7 c 2~ac ~i D D- i 80 L81- t~F~.a t l? S,CZ~ _ ~i ?f-AKov:A-vr 010 ~c~ISd~k; S W 3a 8R Z-23 US 82 83 84 85 - ~ e o x y Z 4G C15-L,' I ~ 8s I 87 , t I G0.d1 p 6Gav ~ p7,GGa'YIC"'~ ~ el i i F4 _30I` Pt~cE w.K. s9 ~ ~ 3 8'r /1 ~a q Cvl~ rw ~1 -ns Z' CQS _$-.fi t; _ SSW 3 cr - /Z/II 88 T~libn ~r - !2 . 91 9 { r~ g1,Df 2 - 94 1 Pa _ •I i~v _ r~J cs 95 , 97 97 98 CZ~ 9.9 1 CJtcG~ 3Q ~5 25 ~/.+1 ! T 2 Z~I O$ 109 101 6 ~1~ 1 S 2S 1~ . 102 r ~CA~ >y"- - IJ Z c~J 3 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of j ss. r J On o before me, ~7T t) o (KStT/f IV ai e y, Date r / Name antl rtla of Officer (e.g., -Jane Doe, No ry Public') personally appeared Name(s) of Q-pErsonally known to me Y ~~.-off Iv e nfTliJO ,yin ,fit ;Iq n Iary PCE-lu l c~liiG 7 •a, w~ AZT IP3 imt ~ w3 Y~ E -proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s)-whose name(s) is/are-subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/slae/thaK executed the same in his/hsUths~r__ authorized capacity(ies), and that by hls/trerlttlElr signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person( acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Place Notary Seal Above ' Signature of Notary Public OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: J7E r / Ti O~ Document Date: i 11 Y f U c Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: T Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer - Title(s): ❑ Partner - ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: Top of thumb here Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer - Title(s): ❑ Partner Limited ❑ General _ ❑ Attorney in Fact El Trustee Top of thumb here ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: 0 2004 National Notary Association • 9350 Be Soto Ave., P.O. Box 2402 • Chatsworth, CA 91 31 3-2 4 02 Item No. 5907 Reorder: Call Toll-Free 1-800-876-6827 We the undersigned support the preservation of and landmark designation effort for the Olinger property at 7495 W. 29th Avenue: 1 Name Address Sin ture Date 103 2q ~~i ~15 4) Z~ - e arc- 10 o+1ZJ /t~j~ Cl ¢ 27L~ ZLfA 5T sl`) 105 12ZI- f~.ewe , ZNG1t3ef !Z ZZy 106, 10 1 108 0 10 119 1 - - _ _ - 111 112 - - - 11 113 r 114 - 115 116 - - - - I ! ' 117 I~ 119 L 120 I _ ~ i ! ~ - - x 121 - - J ~ 122 a - . 123 - - - - ! 124 125 126 127 128 - - - 129 - 130 131 132 133 - 134 135 I 136 - - - - - - - - U - CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of C5 rte- jz~'-r7-f . On 17 before me, .1o / lccl7lf dVet~~~ Data I I Name and Title of Officer (e.g.,'Jane Doe, Notary Public' personally appeared Ke J t w P Rpersonally known to me r ,.nom n.°'. b •.S- C+proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(owhose name(4is/acP_subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she{tbep executed the same in his/hwAheir authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/heriltkeir signature(s)-on the instrument the person(s}, or the entity upon behalf of which the person(a} acted, executed the instrument. WITNE S my hand and official seal. Piece Notary Seal Above Signatur of Notary Public OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: 4p 7-" T! D/'J Document Date: se t6 5 Number of Pages: _ Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer - ❑ Partner -0 Limited ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee Title(s): ❑ General ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: KIM" IRIA111:1=1101 Top of thumb here Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer -Title(s):_ ❑ Partner Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: Top of thumb here 0 2004 National Notary Association • 9350 De Soto Ave., P.O. Box 2402 • ChatswoM, CA 91313-2402 Item No. 5907 Reorder.. Call Toll-Free 1-800-876-6827 We the undersigned support the preservation of and landmark designation effort for the Olinger property at 7495 W. 29th Avenue: Name Address Signa re Date 205 \'L1L cXC2 } (A~ I~ 6 206 j Suet r1 t: fa t~ _Ct' ~t'~ z4, z 30 207 d w `f/ SS 7, LF= -2) L o 208 /emu < 20 ~j G s~/ } G 9: Lq 210 4 J) -2- J OS 212 213 f - -14- o 5 L O~y ¢ jtzj-s F V" r 1----- - ,2 G S7 21 215M G~ a Y -Z CXo I 2 ~ ~ O 216 f✓1_i'1 _LL~ % P, 217 OTC 1~ ~/c /y ~ ~~3 y~ ` Z -UP F 218 . LJ ! I 219 n (L 220 ~S 221 bcnnlxl ~1 222 k' 91` 7 GLU G- ?Z 1 2 1~6 223 ..-`7vher~l am - 224 j GC o/3L.._ r fey uJ~J X5 - - 7 SAOlo~~ w7 1 U<-_ ~IZy -06 Y-j -06 1 225 ~'1~Y Aaya~ - ' / zzs OZ j ?Y_7__D_~-_ v cl- Or i - 3 228 l 1 NO G I f 7 g-8 1 .z~~` F o{ 229 i (V\r" 1f"c- C.) )~o Webs;e Ma j-3-G t 230 ) Q--v ` L' hip NU,-w • ~I ~ 1 ' /6 231 - ---F~/ c of 0110 do toont Y I ersoa_ . ~ ~ n LEN NN t~~~Plfy - - - anon-- ~y. •.v~ t ~G'Q~ w 4356 YV-dsrlo;lh Boulevard F OF coLOQ Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 We the undersigned support the preservation of and landmark designation effort for the Olinger property at 7495 W. 29th Avenue: Name Address Signature Date 171 J Lri ' 442 ! - - 172 " 173 IlI i a r ~<.i "rTS 174 (/44 IlLe5 3 Z1105 061 175 iG c f rsC La Ti 176 . C. 7 7 l ~ ✓,2. L1 78 _ C!il`> ~L /r7 fL 7/ L/=7C fin. - 17'9_ 2 ! ' c 180 181 ;1 0 ,I-A< z _ 'Y 182 183 - - - y 184 185 186 187 7~/-vIV1S ~~~v ~ / ~ ✓ ~c :i'! ' ~ 1 r i ,L ~ , - . ~r1 - 18s J 1 189~ : ll 1~1~ °r ~ iG~_ i 11 1 ~190~ - - w _ - 11 191 I - 192 93 _ - - - ~ 194 195 11) 7-1716W S _Of r ntR. i - r 196 197 orColorad GAMY Of Lemr&, 1 198 ~ _ - 199 appeared before r - ~ - is - 200 I 2 _ 01 _ - -Ty 202 - T - - 203 JEA TTEMAJOUFF L2204 - - N - - - I - RY PUBLIC / vvWnHUV My Commission Expires 09/13/2009 of w„EqT ITEM NO: o U o oRAOO m REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 9, 2006 TITLE: A REQUEST FOR HISTORICAL LANDMARK DESIGNATION FOR PROPERTY ZONED RESIDENTIAL-TWO (R-2) LOCATED AT 7495 W. 29TH AVENUE (CASE NO. WHL-05-01) ® PUBLIC HEARING ❑ ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING ❑ BIDS/MOTIONS ❑ ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING ❑ RESOLUTIONS Quasi-Judicial: ® ❑ Yes No IC 44L Community Development Director EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: City Manager The Wheat Ridge Historical Society is requesting approval of historic landmark designation for the property located at 7495 W. 29`h Avenue. The property is currently zoned Residential-Two and contains three primary structures. If the landmark designation is approved, the existing structures can not be demolished or physically altered without approval of City Council through a landmark alteration process. The property is subj ect to a zone change application to Planned Commercial Development to allow for construction of a restaurant/retail commercial center. The applicant does not intend on keeping any of the structures. Public hearings for the zone change have been delayed pending outcome of the landmark designation request. The Wheat Ridge Historical Society recommended approval ofthe historical landmark designation at a public hearing held on December 14, 2005. This request impacts or is related to Goal 2 of the Strategic Plan relating to the City being prepared for growth and opportunities. COMMISSION/BOARD RECOMMENDATION: The Wheat Ridge Historical Society reviewed this request at a public hearing held on December 14, 2005. A motion to recommend approval was made with all present Board of Directors supporting the motion. STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES: Historic landmark designation nominations can be initiated by the property owner, a member of the Wheat Ridge Historical Society Board of Directors or by a member of City Council. If a property owner objects to the historic designation, a three-fourths vote of all City Council members is required to approve the landmark designation. The property owner does not concur with the designation nomination and has filed a formal objection. The objection is based on there being no reasonable return on the property is the designation is made. Both the zone change case and the historic landmark designation case are quasi-judicial in nature. There have been discussions at the staff level regarding adaptive reuse of the old mansion and the possible relocation of the farmhouse and barn. Because of the quasi-judicial issue relating to both requests, these discussions have not occurred above the staff level. There are rigid guidelines prescribed in Article IX (Historic Preservation) regarding scheduling of public hearings for landmark cases. If a property owner objects to the nomination, a public hearing must occur within 45 days of the Wheat Ridge Historical Society recommendation. Staff has contracted with Felsburg Holt & Ullevig to undertake a historic significance evaluation of the property and buildings. At the time of this writing, the study is not concluded. It will be available by January 6, 2006, and will be distributed to City Council prior to the January 9 historic landmark designation public hearing. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: 1. Approve the landmark designation. 2. Do not approve the landmark designation so the property owner can proceed with his zone change request. 3. Move to continue the case so that negotiations regarding the structures can occur between staff, the Wheat Ridge Historical Society and the property owner. FINANCIAL IMPACT: There are no review fees collected for the processing of this application. There will be no direct monetary impact to the City if the request is approved. Redevelopment and any subsequent revenue gains to the City may be impacted by the landmark designation. If the request is denied, the processing of the zone change case will continue. If that request is approved and the property redevelops commercially, there may be sales tax revenues generated by any retail uses. Additional review fees will be required at the time of building permit and use tax will also be collected on any building materials if the property redevelops. RECOMMENDED MOTIONS: Option A: "I move to APPROVE Case No. WHL-05-01, a nomination for historic landmark designation for property zoned Residential-Two located at 7495 W. 29`h Avenue, for the following reasons: 1. The farmhouse and barn represent Wheat Ridge's agrarian past. 2. Neither the architect nor the builder has been identified. However, the mansion embodies distinguishing characteristics of an architectural type constructed in the Denver metropolitan area associated with a particular architecture firm in the early 1900's. 3. There has been information submitted that discloses the history of the family originally living on the property who were prominent in metropolitan Denver history. 4. The Wheat Ridge Historical Society Board of Directors has recommended approval of the designation." OR Option B: "I move to DENY Case No. WHL-05-01, a nomination for historic landmark designation for property zoned Residential-Two located at 7495 W. 29th Avenue, for the following reasons: 1. The property owner does not concur with the nomination and has filed a letter of objection. 2. Although the mansion structure is quite striking in design, it does not represent a particular style, method of construction or use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship of the period. 3. Not all structures on the property are 50 years old." OR Option C: "I move to CONTINUE Case No. WHL-05-01 so staff can meet with representatives of the property owner and the Wheat Ridge Historical Society to determine if there are any compromises regarding the saving of the structures on the property." Report Prepared by: Meredith Reckert (303-235-2848) Reviewed by: Alan White Attachments: 1. City Council staff report (with exhibits) 3 ,oF WHO o CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE m PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT C~CORP~O TO: City Council CASE MANAGER: M. Reckert CASE NO. & NAME: WHL-05-01/Wheat Ridge Historical Society DATE OF MEETING: January 9, 2006 ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a Historical Landmark Designation for property zoned R-2 LOCATION OF REQUEST: 7495 W. 29s' Avenue APPLICANT: APPROXIMATE AREA: Claudia Worth, Vice President Wheat Ridge Historical Society 4.6 acres of property area PRESENT ZONING: R-2, Residential- Two COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Small Office/Business Center and Single Family Detached (4 do's /acre) ENTER INTO RECORD: (X) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (X) CASE FILE (X) ZONING ORDINANCE (X) DIGITAL PRESENTATION Q SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS Location map Case NoMHL-05-01/WRHS j ATTACHMENT 1 All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to make a determination regarding this request. I. REQUEST The applicant requests approval of a historical landmark designation for property zoned R-2, Residential-Two located at 7495 W. 29`h Avenue. The applicant is Claudia Worth, Vice President of the Wheat Ridge Historical Society. Pursuant to Section 26-905 C., an application for historic designation may be submitted by the property owner, a member of the Wheat Ridge Historical Society Board of Directors or by a member of City Council. (Exhibit I, Designation Nomination Form with attachments) The property owner does not concur with the designation nomination and has filed a formal objection. (Exhibit 2, Letter of Objection) In the event that it is a non-owner applicant and the property owner objects to the nomination, a three- fourths vote of the entire City Council is required to grant historic designation. Upon designation, it is unlawful to demolish, destroy or undertake any major change to structures unless and until a landmark alteration permit is issued. Attached is supporting evidence regarding the history of the property from another party of interest who owns property in the neighborhood. (Exhibit 3, Information packet from Kevin Murphy) It should be noted that this property is subject to a zone change request to rezone the property to Planned Commercial Development and for approval of an outline development plan. An administrative decision was made with consultation by the City Attorney and the applicant's representative that the zone change will not proceed to Planning Commission until the historic landmark designation nomination is decided upon by City Council. II. EXISTING CONDITIONS The property in question is zoned Residential-Two, is comprised of 4.6 acres of land area and has street frontages on three sides; W. 29"h Avenue on the south, Wadsworth Blvd. on the west and the interior curve of the intersection of W. 30`h Avenue and Webster at the northeast comer of the property. An unbuilt half width of right-of-way for W. 30`h Avenue abuts the property on the north. (Exhibit 4, ALTA survey) Existing Structures: There are three primary structures on the property. On the north end of the site is a one and a half story frame structure referred to as the "farmhouse" which was built circa 1892. Structures associated with the farmhouse include the original barn with brick foundation and a newer, contemporary double car garage. The farmhouse has an 842 square foot footprint. A driveway runs along the northern side of the structures from Wadsworth east to the 30`" Avenue/Webster intersection. On the southern portion of the property is what once was a primary residence of the Olinger family which shall be referred to as the "mansion". It is of brick construction, contains a 3300 square foot footprint and has a red riled roof. The structure has a basement and a second story addition at the northwest corner. The interior of the structure was modified for office use. Other modifications to the original structure include a tented vinyl breezeway on the east side and a handicapped ramp on the Case NO.WHL-05-01/WRHS 2 west side. The "mansion" was originally constructed in 1914. The third primary structure on the property is the chapel structure which was built in 1969-1970. It has similar architectural features to the mansion including the same brick pattern and red tiled roof. It has abasement, a porte cochere on the south side and is 3300 square feet in size. Other miscellaneous features on the property include a brick well house and a pergola running along the Wadsworth frontage. The pergola appears to have been repaired numerous times and has vinyl slats running along the top, having replaced the original wood. The pergola and the climbing roses along the support columns became an identifying feature for the property to the extent that the mortuary was called the "Rose Arbor Mortuary". There is also a "sunken garden" area on the east side of the chapel. Access and parking: Existing access to the site is by two primary curb cuts; one each on W. 29`h Avenue and Wadsworth. When entering from the 29`h Avenue side, a person can drive either along the south side of the mansion and chapel through the porte cochere or proceed north to the parking area on the north side of those structures in the interior of the site. This parking area is large enough to accommodate around 100 vehicles. This lot was added when the chapel was built in 1969-1970. The other primary access from Wadsworth proceeds directly into the same parking area. A second access point farther north on Wadsworth appears to only provide access to the farmhouse. This driveway access does not connect to the large parking area north of the mansion and chapel. Landscaping: There is an abundance of existing landscape materials on the property. A variety of large trees are located around the mansion and chapel. Tree varieties include cottonwoods, oaks and blue spruce. The area to the northeast of the interior parking area is park-like with trees and shrubs. A solid privacy fence ranging in height from six feet to eight feet runs along the eastern property line. Another landscape feature is a sunken garden area with concrete walks and stairways on the east side of the chapel. Existing use of the property: It is unclear as to when and how the property was converted from residential to a commercial mortuary use. On August 5, 1969, the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners approved a zone change on the property from R-2 to RCl subsequent to the issuance of a building permit for the chapel. Seven days later, the Mayor and City Council of the newly incorporated City of Wheat Ridge came into office. Neighbors and adjacent property owners filed suit to overturn the zone change in district court. In April of 1970, the court found that the rezoning was an unconstitutional exercise of zoning powers by the Board of Commissioners and ordered the City of Wheat Ridge to take action to rezone the property back to R-2. At that time a church (chapel) was a permitted use in the R-2 zone district The use of the property as a mortuary office and chapel is considered non-conforming. Since the property was sold, chapel services have stopped but the mansion is still being utilized as offices. Under the existing zoning and development code, mortuaries and crematories are special uses in the C- 1, C-2 and I zone districts. Principal, commercial uses are not permitted in the R-2 zone district. Churches are a special use in the residential zone districts. III. HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION City Council may designate historic landmarks in the City with testimony and evidence presented at the public hearing and the following evaluation criteria: Case NOMfIL-05-01MRHS 1. Whether the property owner will retain the ability to earn a reasonable return on the property which is the subject of the application; and, It is impossible for staff to ascertain whether a reasonable return on the property can be made if the property is designated as a landmark and one or all of the existing structures remain. The property owner has indicated that he is not interested in an adaptive reuse of the mansion for offices. The interior of the chapel structure is ideal for a church use. A church is a special use in the R-2 zone district. There has been discussion of relocating the farmhouse and barn off-site. No additional support for this position has been provided by the property owner. 2. Whether the structure exemplifies or reflects the broad cultural, political, economic or social history of the nation, state or community; or Staff has concluded that structures on the property that are older than 50 years of age do not reflect cultural, political, economic or social history of the nation, state or community, although the farmhouse and barn could be seen as representing Wheat Ridge's agrarian past. Fifty years of age is a benchmark typically used in designating historic landmarks. 3. Whether the structure is identified with historic persons or with important events in national, state or local history; or George Olinger, and the Olinger family in general, is a name widely known in north Denver and the metropolitan region. The Oligners contributed significantly to the built, social and economic environment in the early to mid-1900's. 4. Whether the structure embodies distinguishing characteristics of an architectural type inherently valuable for the study of a period, style, method of construction or of indigenous materials or craftsmanship; or Staff believes that the structure on the property with the most distinguishing architectural characteristics is the mansion. The consulting firm of Felsburg Holt and Ullevig has been retained to prepare a historical significance evaluation of the property and structures. This information should be available prior to the January 9 public hearing. 5. Whether the structure is representative of the notable work of a master builder, designer or architect whose individual ability has been recognized; or No evidence has been presented which identifies that the structure(s) were the work of a master builder, designer or architect of the era. It has been speculated by an area property owner that the architect who designed the mansion may have been one of the members of the Fisher family (William, Arthur or Alan) who designed many of the notable historic structures in the Denver metropolitan area. 6. Is recommended as an historic landmark by the Wheat Ridge Historical Society board of directors. On December 14, 2005, the nine attending members of the Wheat Ridge Historical Society Board of Directors recommended approval to designate the property as. a local historical landmark. Case NoMHL-05-01MRHS 4 IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONXINDINGS OF FACT Staff has delayed giving a recommendation of approval or denial pending review of the historical significance evaluation. Staff has made the following findings of fact: L A nomination has been filed for historic landmark designation for property zoned R-2 at 7495 W. 29"' Avenue. 2. The property owner does not concur with the nomination and has filed a letter of objection. 3. The farmhouse and bam could be seen as representing Wheat Ridge's agrarian past. 4. Although the mansion structure is quite striking in design, it does not represent a particular style, method of construction or of use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship of the period. 5. Neither the architect nor the builder has been identified. It may be argued that the mansion embodies distinguishing characteristics of an architectural type constructed in the Denver metropolitan area associated with a particular architecture firm in the early 1900's. 6. There has been information submitted that discloses the history of the family originally living on the property who were prominent in metropolitan Denver history. 7. Not all structures on the property are 50 years old. 8. The Wheat Ridge Historical Society Board of Directors has recommended approval of the designation. V. RECOMMENDED MOTIONS: Option A: "I move to APPROVE Case No. WHL-05-01, a nomination for historic landmark designation for property zoned Residential-Two located at 7495 W. 29"' Avenue, for the following reasons: 1. The farmhouse and barn could be seen as representing Wheat Ridge's agrarian past. 2. Neither the architect nor the builder has been identified. However, it may be argued that the mansion embodies distinguishing characteristics of an architectural type constructed in the Denver metropolitan area associated with a particular architecture firm in the early 1900's. 3. There has been information submitted that discloses the history of the family originally living on the property who were prominent in metropolitan Denver history. 4. The Wheat Ridge Historical Society Board of Directors has recommended approval of the designation." OR Option B: "I move to DENY Case No. WHL-05-01, a nomination for historic landmark designation for property zoned Residential-Two located at 7495 W. 29`h Avenue, for the following reasons: The property owner does not concur with the nomination and has filed a letter of objection. Case No.WHL-05-01/WRHS 2. Although the mansion structure is quite striking in design, it does not represent a particular style, method of construction or of use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship of the period. 3. Not all structures on the property are 50 years old." OR Option C: "I move to CONTINUE Case No. WHL-05-01 so staff can meet with representatives of the property owner and the Wheat Ridge Historical Society to determine if there are any compromises regarding the saving of the structures on the property." Case NoMHL-05-01MRHS 6 4 Community Development Department City of Wheat Ridge Date determined "eligible" 7500 W. 29`" Avenue Ordinance # Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 0059 Date Recorded LOCAL HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION NOMINATION FORM Please type/print and complete all entries. Date: J, - 0Jr,- C7 S TdLP C lY ► C E Address _'j ( xj ,Z i ( )try 'Y 111 V ^ ~ Legal.Description: "Ph Tow3.S~rrlpR amx) (Dq [AFs.S ~4 c!,- act !4 Z- Nth lly' Property Name (Historic and/or common): V y < Name/True ~130L" ta w~ (I~t~y}~tdttCP nr Address: 9 (0 60 oe-.K izr o m ki L!"go CC3 v Phone: A ( Coo ' Relationship to Owner:_ Signature of Applicant QN, q• Subscribed and sworn to m his daggf • r G 20 476 c PUBLIC • Pp0 N otary Public Q(c M c i i i OF COLO y omm ss on exp res s Can lesion Exon s m116/2t106 Name E Sup Y lv [Lc rYSN1 ~asa L~ c Yhone: i 0-3 - a 7 l - t Oo 0 Address: ZQQ Sn<u-~-- . S~ r-zJC 4~-LO D ~'r~iZ✓(~ ~ Q'Z3p Owner Does ❑ Does not (consent to designation. Signature of Owner Date ~SSI)RT~a1li} Cate or : Ownership: Status: Present Use: ❑ Public Occu ied ❑ Commercial ❑ E te tai t p n r nmen Lr4.Structure tj3-Private ❑ Unoccupied ❑ Educational ❑ Govern ent X Structure .Site ❑ Religious KOther: mC r k ❑ Object ❑ Residential cu-.F-k ~ EXHIBIT I Existing Designation: ❑ National Register ❑ State Register x 910 W Arc 'tectural: epresents notable work of master builder, designer or architect em~bodies distinguishing characteristics of an architectural type, period, style or method of construction [~Embodics distinguishing characteristics of indigenous materials or craftsmanship His orical: dentified with historic persons Identified with important events in national, state or local history Other: Exemplifies or reflects cultural, economic or social history of the nation Recommend as historic landmark by Wheat Ridge Historical Society Further Comments: - c-- ~-W'a a~EA (Add a separate sheet of paper if needed.) Please attach a narrative of the historical significance of the property. Include a title search if the property is important for its association with a significant person. Further Construction Building Mat Architectural Special Features/Surroundings: (Add a separate sheet of paper if needed. Please include photos of each elevation of the structure.) Describe any additions to the property: F e `-{.±O r \,;(a&/ S ONNO 7 a b 11 L Rev. 11103105 3 Attach photographs and other documentation which supports historic landmark designation. OAHP1403 determination Rev. 12/97 Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Historic Architectural Survey Form Official eligibility (OAHP use only) Date Initials Determine3TI3g bli NR Determined Not Eligible-NR Determined Eligible - SR Determined Not Eligible-SR Need Data Contributes to eligible NR District Noncontributing to eligible NR District 1. State site number: 5JF.1392 2. Temporaray state number: 3. County: Jefferson 4. City: Wheat Ridge 5. Historic building name: George Olinger house 6. Current building name: Olinger Mortuary 7. Building address: 7595 W. 29th Av., Wheat Ridge, CO 80215 B. Owner name and address: Colorado Mortuaries, Inc., P.O. Box, Houston Tx Geographic information 9. P.M. 6th Township 3 South Range 69 West SW 1/4 of SW 1/4 of NW 1/4 of SE 1/4 of section 26 10. UTM reference Zone 13 _ Easting 493120 Northing 4400790 11. USGS quad name: Arvada, Colo. Year: 1965 PR 1980 Map scale x 7.5' 15' Attach photo copy of approriate map section. 12. Lot (s): West 1/2 lot 3 Block: 1 Addition: Barth Subdivsion Year of Addition: 1882 13. Boundary Description and justification: 69-03-26-064800-01-03 This structure is located on the above described lot. Architectural Description 14. Building plan (footprint, shape): rectangular 15. Dimensions in feet: Length x Width 16. Number of stories: 2 17. Primary external wall material (s) (enter no more than two): Brick 18 Roof configuration (enter no more than one): Hipped 19. Primary external roof material (enter no more than one): Tile OAHP1403, page 2 Site number: 53F.1392 20. Special features (enter all that apply): This structure consists of two major components. The portion on the west is the George Olinger house, built in 1914 as a single dwelling and converted in the.1970s into a mortuary. The portion on the east was constructed in the 1970s as a mortuary and was designed to match the architectural features of the Olinger house. There is a covered portico in front of the east building for funeral car loading. The west building is built elevated above street level and hasa stairway leading down to W. 29th Ave. The south wail of the house has numerous windows on either side of the center front entry door. 21. General architectural description: The two buildings are conjoined to form a single unit but with very different details and methods of con- struction. The west building, a former single dwelling, has numerous windows and entry doors on the south and east walls. There is a garage built into the lower level of the west wall at the north end of the building. Grade changes allow a formal front entry on the south side of the building and a rear entry on the north side of the building. The entire west building is constructed using bricks painted white. The east building is taller and features four large windows on both the east and west walls. It does use similar white painted bricks but over a steel beam construction method. A drive through portico is adjacent to the south wall of the east building. 22. Architectural style/building type: Commercial 23. Landscaping or special setting features: There is an extensive lawn in the south (front) and west (side) yards. There is a large asphalt paved parking area in the north yard and an asphalt paved driveway in the east (side) yard extending from 29th Ave. to the parking lot. The lot features numerous mature trees throughout the grounds including parking areas. Included are nine large oak trees lined parallel to 29th Ave. and to Wadsworth Blvd. There is a pergola on the west property line adjacent to Wadsworth Blvd. There is statuary in the Classical Greek tradition in the front yard. There is a concrete sidewalk, curb and gutter on Wadsworth but the lawn extends to the aspalt of W. 29th Ave. in the front yard. 24. Associated buildings, features, or objects: There is the caretakers' dwelling located at the northwest corner of the lot with a street address of 2960 Wadsworth Blvd. This structure is a one and one-half story wood_ siding dwelling with front gable roof. Due to regrading of Wadsworth Blvd. in about 1959 this house now sits below Wadsworth. Associated with the structure is a garage or storage building at W. 30th Av. and Webster St. Jefferson County assessor lists caretakers' dwelling as constructed in 1892. Parcels within Barth Subdivision were known to have been rented prior to their first recorded sales, so this date appears reasonable. OAHP, page 3 Site number: 5JF.1392 The pergola was an integral feature of the landscapingof the Olinger residence when it was constructed in 1914. Vines and other plants covered the 300 foot long pergola for many years providinga shady walkway for both residents and pedestrians alike. Originally the Rocky Mountain Ditch lateral was located on the east side of Wadsworth near the structure... Since the 1970s there has been no vines but the structure remains and some restoration work has been done. Architectural History 25. Date of Construction: Estimate Actual 1914 Source of information: Jefferson county assessors records. Wheat Ridge News (published 1914-1916, copies at Wheat Ridge Historic Park) 26. Architect: - Unknown Source of information Not available 27. Builder/Contractor: Unknown Source of information: Not available 28. Original owner: George Olinger Source of information: - Jefferson County assessors index; Newspaper articles 29. Construction history (include description and dates of major additions, alterations or demolitions): The west part of the building was constructed in 1914 and was the home of George W. and Margaret Olinger. The house included living quarters and formal entertainment facilities. In the 1920 property tax assessment roll, the Olinger house is one of the most valuable in Wheat Ridge. There may have been an addition at the north end of the building while it was a residence or it may have been added during construction of the adjacent mortuary. The mortuary was constructed in 1970 at which time the residential quarters were assimilated into the mortuary operation. 30. X Original location Moved Date of move(s) Historical Associations 31. Original use(s): single dwelling (suburban estate) 32. Intermediate use(s): 33. Current use(s): Commercial (mortuary) 34. Site type(s): Neighborhood commercial site OAHP1403, page 4 Site number: 5JF.1392 35. Historical background: This site was originally part of the Asahel-Beach 160 acre pre-emption which was purchased by Moritz and William Barthin, 1872 and was platted as Barth Subdivision in 1882..Simon Brown is the first identified purchaser of the ten acres described as Lot 3 Block 1. Parcels within Barth subdivision were rented prior to purchase, but indi- vidual renters of particular parcels have not been identified. George W. Olinger purchased the West,half of lot 3 on March 1, 1911. The house was built in 1914. At the time Olinger was manager ofhis family's mortuary at 16th and Boulder Streets. This house is one of four Olinger-owned parcels along West 29th Ave.: the mortuary (1908), Olinger Gardens subdivision (1919), the house (1914) and Crown Hill Cemetery (1907). Olinger also developed Welshire, Bonne Brae and Indian Hills subdivisions; 36. Sources of information: Jefferson county assessors index; 'Olinger' family newspaper clipping file at Wheat Ridge Historic Park library; Thomas Noel, Denver: Rocky Mountain Gold, p. 223. Samuel Johnson, Auto- biography. Significance: 37. Local landmark designation: yes x no Date of designation: Designating authority: 38. Applicable National Register Criteria: A. Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad pattern of our history. R B. Associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. A C. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or - - D. Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important. in history or prehistory. Qualifies under Criteria Consideration A through G (see Manual) Does not meet any of the above National Register criteria 39. Area(s) of significance: Significant person, 40. Period of significance: 1914-1940 ' 41. Level of significance: Local (Wheat Ridge) and metropolitan (Denver) 42. Statement of significance: George W. Olinger made several significant contributions to the development of Wheat Ridge including his initial investment in Crown Hill Cemetery in 1907 and his development of Olinger Gardens at 29th and Sheridan in 1919. Later, following his death, the Olinger mortuary expanded its operations to this site. Olinger developed the Denver-area's largest mortuary business. His house was built to re- flect his rising status in the Denver community. Both the construction methods and the landscaping features make this house stand out among Wheat Ridge residential structures. OAHP1403, page 5 Site number: 5JF.1392 43. Assessment of historic physical integrity related to significance: Despite conversion from a residence to a commercial use the west building constructed in 1914 retains its original exterior features. The newer east building uses architectural elements such as roofline and use of windows to establish a uniform appearance to the site. Continued maintenance of the landscaping and pergola contribute to the site's significance. National Register Eligibility Assessment 44. National Register eligibility field assessment: R Eligible Not Eligible Need D 45. Is there National Register district potential? yes E no Discuss: Most of the older structures associated with Crown Rill Cemetery are no longer standing such as the offices, maintenance facilities and green house. The National Register Tower of Memories is one-half miles west of the Olinger house and mortuary. Due to architectural style and adjacent land use differences with nearby residential structures, this structure would not contribute to a National Register district. 46. If there is National Register district potential, is this building Contributing Noncontributing Recording Information 47. Photograph numbers: Negative filed at: Wheat Ridge Historic Park, 4610 Robb St., Wheat Ridge 48. Report title: Wheat Ridge Historic Structure Survey 1998-1999 49. Date(s): February 24, 1998 50. Recorder(s): Robert J. Olson 51. Organization: Wheat Ridge Historical Society - 52. Address: P.O.. Box 1833, Wheat Ridge, CO 80034-1833 53. Phone number(s): 303-421-9111 (office) or 303-433-6097 (home) Colorado Historical Society, Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation 1300 Broadway, Denver, CO 80203, (303) 866-3395 A T3 11-4 1 _U( 01A z-iV -oS Olinger Mansion 7495 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge Colorado A structure may be eligible for National/State Register designation if it is over 50 years old and meets one of the following criteria: Is this structure architecturally significant. 1. This house is certainly larger and more impressive than surrounding residential structures. 2. The architects or contractors have not been identified. 3. The residential portion (west) was built in 1914 4. There was an earlier residential structure now located at the north end of lot. 5. There was an arbor built along Wadsworth which still stands. 6. There was a landscaping element south and southwest of the front entry. Is this structure associated with persons (or institutions) which made significant contributions to the community. George Washington Olinger (1882-1954) 1. George Olinger was owner or manager of Olinger Mortuaries, 1901 to 1940's which was located at 15'h and Platte (1890-1909) or 1600 Boulder St. (1909-1999). 2. He was a principal in Associated Industries, which developed Bonnie Brae (Denver), Olinger Gardens (Wheat Ridge) and Indian Hills (Jefferson County) 3. He was a principal in Crown Hill Cemetery (1907) and other memorial parks. 4. He was a principal in building Tower of Memories (a National Landmark) 5. He was founder of Highland Boys youth organization 1916 unti11940's. 6. He provided the first mass transit in Wheat Ridge (circa 1910's). 7. He was a founding member and officer of Colorado Funeral Directors Assoc. 8. He was a founding member and officer of American Funeral Directors Assoc. 9. He provided quality, affordable housing for his employees in 1919 at Olinger Gardens Subdivision. 10. He supported the fine arts through the Olinger Quartet, the Olinger organists and other musical groups. 11. He was an early advocate of "planned needs" in the funeral business, providing a financial model for individuals to plan their own faneral/death activities. 12. He was an early advocate of the "memorial park" which was aesthetically pleasing and carefully designed to replace "burial grounds" Frances Vanderber 1. Frances Vanderber was a principal in Olinger Mortuaries, Crown Hill Cemetery, Tower of Memories. 2. Vanderber was son-in-law of George W. Olinger, and carried out many of his business and philanthropic endeavors. Olinger Mortuaries 1. Olinger Mortuaries was founded by John and Emma Olinger in 1890 at 15th and Platte Sts. They later constructed a modern mortuary at 1600 Boulder St. (1909-1999). 2. In 1969, an addition was constructed east of the Olinger family home and the entire complex became a full service mortuary. 3. By 1986 Service Corporation International purchased Olinger Mortuaries, Crown Hill Cemetery and other assets. 4. Jefferson County Open Space purchased portions of Crown Hill for open space and park purposes. 5. Olinger Gardens was a large employer of Wheat Ridge and Denver area workers (see Olinger Gardens Subdivision). Associated Industries 1. Served as a real estate development and financial arm of the Olinger business enterprises, planning, constructing and developing Bonnie Brae (Denver), Olinger Gardens (Wheat Ridge), and Indian Hills (Jefferson County) 2. Involved in numerous other business activites. Crown Hill Cemetery 1. In about 1907 George Olinger arranged to purchase about 150 acres of land from Henry Lee (later expanded to about 230 acres). In about 1908 burials began in Crown Hill Cemetery, both from Olinger and other mortuaries. 2. Crown Hill featured the landscaped architecture associated with memorial gardens rather than "burial ground" design used in earlier cemeteries. 3. Crown Hill featured "perpetual maintenance" and acquired water rights on the Rocky Mountain Ditch and water storage rights in Crown Hill Lake. 4. Crown Hill Cemetery was a large employer of Wheat Ridge area workers. Olinger Gardens Subdivision 1. Is located between Sheridan and Fenton Streets and 29'h and 32nd Avenues. It was purchased by Olinger business interests from Moses Hallett estate (which acquired it from James W. Richards family). 2. It provided quality, affordable housing for the workers in various Olinger family businesses and others. Mass Transit 1. Olinger family businesses constructed and operated a street car line from 29th and Yates past Wadsworth into Crown Hill Cemetery sometime around 1910. 2. This line provided funeral cars, employee transportation, and general public transportation connecting with Denver Transit Company lines inside Denver. 3. Continued to operate a shuttle bus after the street car lines Were taken out. Service Corporation International 1. Many Olinger family business enterprises were acquired during the 1980's. 2. This company plays a pivotal role in consolidation of the mortuary and cemetery business enterprises in North America. 3. The consolidation may now be affecting these potentially historical structures. 1 c w+X'S" ~ o ~ s f ~ C17 1^ 1 07 E x ~r CD ` ' co C ~ -oe CL tD Al i *-r I t e Michael A. Sheldon & Associates, LLC Attorney and Counselor at Law 5290 DTC Parkway, Suite 160 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 (303) 770-0200 (303) 220-8027 - Telefax Michael A. Sheldon, Esq. December 13, 2005 VIA Telefax & Hand Deliver Mr. Alan White, Director of Community Development Department City of Wheat Ridge 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 nloie- RE: Formal Objection to Wheat Ridge Historical Society Local Historic Landmark Designation of Wadsworth Exchange Property Dear Mr. White, Please accept this letter on behalf of the owners of the above referenced property as the formal objection pursuant to Section 26-905 C of the City Code for the following reasons: 1. The request for local historic landmark designation is not timely made. It has only been made after a formal application of the property owner, DHE Wadsworth, LLC and ASM Casa, LLC for the development of this property for retail uses. The Wheat Ridge Historical Society had an opportunity to purchase this property when it was on the market prior to our Clients purchase and initiation of its Land Use plan application. 2. The Wheat Ridge Historical Society's efforts are in conflict with the City's comprehensive plan which shows retail uses for the property, as well as the proposed widening of Wadsworth Blvd., and the required streetscape implementation. 3. The Wheat Ridge Historical Society has not followed appropriate federal and state procedures in terms of both its own creation and its nomination of our client's property for local historic landmark designation. 4. The property is not historic by objective standards. The funeral chapel was constructed in 1970, the pergola is now held in place by concrete and plastic, and the interior of the "big house" has been gutted over the years in favor of contemporarv uoarades. EXHIBIT 2 Michael A. Sheldon & Associates, LLC Page 2 December 13, 2005 Mr. Alan White Our Clients have attempted to meet with the Wheat Ridge Historical Society to discuss several items, including moving the smaller northern house to a location of its choosing, but the Society has refused to meet with the property owner or its representatives. We intend to be present at the Wheat Ridge Historical Society Board of Directors meeting now scheduled for December 14th at 7:30pm to further express our objections, and at a City Council public hearing, presently scheduled for January 9, 2006 on any recommendation that he Wheat Ridge Historical Society may make to the City Council on its petition for historical Landmark designation to further express our objection pursuant to Section 26-906 of the Wheat Ridge City Code. At such City Council hearing, the property owner will take the position that no structure or building shall be granted historic designation for the reason that the property owner will not be able to retain the ability to earn a reasonable return on the property which is the subject of the application and further, the provisions of Section 26-906 (A) (2) cannot be met by the application. Finally, the property owner desires to implement Section 26-906 (C) which requires a 3/4th vote of the entire City Council on this application since the property owner does not desire historic designation by virtue of the filing of this written protest. before the scheduled public hearing. If anything further is required in connection with this letter of objection, please do not hesitate to call. Yours truly, Michael A. Sheldon & Associates, LLC Michael A. Sheldon, Esq. Cc: Mr. Gerald Dahl, Esq. Mr. Andy Miller Mr. Mike Pharo Wheat Ridge Historical Society, Claudia Worth, President engineering paths to transportation solutions Historic Resource Assessment of the Former Olinger<Property in the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado Submitted to The City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Department Prepared by Jason Marmor, Staff Cultural Resources Specialist January 6, 2006 Syracuse Way, Suite 600 Centennial, CO 80111 www.fhueng_com fax 303.721.0832 engineering paths to transportation solutions Introduction At the request of the City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Department, Felsburg Holt & Ullevig (FHU) completed a significance assessment of the 4.5-acre, former George W. Olinger property located at Wadsworth Boulevard and 291h Avenue in Wheat Ridge, Colorado. The property contains several historic buildings, including the George W. Olinger House (built in 1914 and later: used as a mortuary) at the south end of the property, and a farmhouse (built c. 1892) and an associated barn located at the north end of the parcel. The site also contains a long (approx. 200- 300 ft-long) historic pergola colonnade structure closely paralleling Wadsworth Boulevard; a small historic brick pumphouse; and landscaping including sunken garden areas and numerous large trees. Other, non-historic features are located on the property, including a tall, painted brick chapel building erected in 1969 adjacent to the Olinger House; a modern wood frame garage located behind the c. 1892 farmhouse, and large asphalt-paved parking lots behind (north of) the Olinger House/Mortuary and Chapel. Photographs of the property are appended to this report. The investigation was completed between December 29, 2005 and January 3, 2006 by Jason Marmor, FHU Cultural Resources Specialist. This report presents the result of that investigation, along with recommendations concerning the property's eligibility for designation as a City of Wheat Ridge Historical Landmark, as well as for listing on the State Register of Historic Properties (SRHP) and National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The assessment was requested in conjunction with the Wheat Ridge City Council's review, on January 9, 2006, of a Historical Landmark application filed for the property by the Wheat Ridge Historical Society. No inventory forms were prepared as part of this effort. Objectives and Methods The purpose of the project was to assess the condition, integrity, and significance (historical and architectural) of the former Olinger property and its individual buildings and features. Information was collected through a site visit conducted on December 28, 2005, and through limited archival research. Historical -information about the property and the Olinger family and business ventures was obtained from the Colorado Historical Society/Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation; the Western History Department of the Denver Public Library; and at the Jefferson County Recorder's and Assessor's offices in Golden. The information collected through a site visit and archival research were used to evaluate the site's significance in terms of the City's Historical Landmark criteria as well as the criteria of the NRHP and the SRHP. These criteria are detailed in the Significance Evaluation section of this report (below). Previous Historic Preservation Actions Concerning the Site The George W. Olinger house/mortuary was first recorded as a historical property in 1998-1999 by Robert J. Olson on behalf of the Wheat Ridge Historical Society, as part of a State Historic Fund- supported survey of historic structures in Wheat Ridge (Olson 1998, 1999). The Olinger house/mortuary was originally assigned site number 5JF1392, and Olson evaluated the property 6300 South Syracuse Way, Suite 600 Centennial, CO 80111 tel 303.721.1440 fax 303.721.0832 www.fhuen-,.com info@fhueng.com January 6, 2006 Olinger Property Historical Evaluation Page 3 as eligible for the National Register of Historic Places under Criteria B and C. This finding of significance has not been subject to formal review or concurrence by the Colorado Historical Society/Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (OAHP). The site number was later changed by the OAHP to 5JF1910. In late 2005 two efforts were undertaken by separate Wheat Ridge citizens to obtain designation of the Olinger house/mortuary property as a significant historical resource. In September of 2005, Mr. Kevin Murphy commenced an effort to achieve listing of the Olinger property on either the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) or State Register of Historic Properties (SRHP). A Preliminary Property Evaluation Form and supporting documentation has been provided to the Colorado Historical Society for review. At this point, the Colorado Historical Society believes that there is insufficient justification to support a finding of significance to the degree needed for either the State or National registers; furthermore, the architectural integrity of the Olinger house has been diminished -by probable alterations and the adjacent 1969 chapel building. Finally, property owner consent is required for listing on the state and national registers, and is unlikely to be obtained in -this case (Chris Geddes, personal communication, 12/30/2005). On November 5, 2005, Claudia Worth, President of the Wheat Ridge Historical Society, applied for Local Historic Landmark designation of the Olinger property by the City of Wheat Ridge. Unlike the state and national register programs, Local Historic Landmark designation can be made without land owner consent, if the Wheat Ridge City Council approves such a designation by a three-fourth majority of the entire membership. The November 2005 Local Historic Landmark Designation Nomination Form asserts that the Olinger house is significant for its architectural characteristics as well as its association with an important person: George W. Olinger. The Wheat Ridge Historical Society supports designation of the property as a Local Historic Landmark, and the city council will meet to decide the issue on Monday, January 9, 2006. Site Description The former George W. Olinger property is located on the northeast side of the intersection of W. 29th Avenue and Wadsworth Boulevard in the City of Wheat Ridge. The property is rectangular, and contains 4.45 acres. Opposite the property, on the west side of Wadsworth Boulevard, is Crown Hill Memorial Park, a cemetery established in the early 20`h Century by George W. Olinger. The City of Wheat Ridge municipal offices are located just south of the property. Modern residential neighborhoods are located on the north and east sides of the parcel. C. 1892 Farmhouse and outbuildings The property contains two main building clusters and several other features. At the north end of the parcel is a small, 1%2 story Vernacular Wood Frame farmhouse and two outbuildings. This dwelling has a separate address from the rest of the property: 2960 Wadsworth Boulevard. According to the Jefferson County Assessor's property record, this house was built in 1892. The main portion of the house measures 23 ft wide x 30 ft long. The dwelling is rectangular in plan, with a nearly full-width open front porch equipped with a balustrade railing and a shed roof. A steeply-pitched front gable roof covers the dwelling, and two red brick interior chimneys exit from the roof peak. Its walls are clad with clapboard siding, painted white. An enclosed rear porch, measuring 7 x 13 ft; is attached to the rear/east elevation. The house is fenestrated with narrow 1/1 double-hung windows. No alterations are evident. The house, which contains 1,230 ft2 of living space, appears to be well maintained and in very good condition. January 6, 2006 Olinger Property Historical Evaluation Page 4 A short distance behind and slightly north of the farmhouse is a historic, front-gabled wood frame barn. This barn measures 38 ft long x 20 ft wide and contains 760 ft' of interior space. This barn likely was constructed at about the same time as the farmhouse (c. 1890s). The barn is clad with horizontal board (drop or clapboard) siding, painted white. It is composed to two joined sections, including a 24 ft long x 20 ft wide east section covered by a steeply-pitched front gable roof, and a lean-to west section, measuring 14 ft long x 20 ft wide. The barn appears unmodified and in good condition. Another, non-historic outbuilding is located a short distance southeast of the farmhouse. This is a detached, wood frame garage covered by a low-pitched front-gable roof. The garage was evidently built much later than the farmhouse and barn, possibly in the 19506-1960s. The building rests on a high concrete foundation, and its walls are clad with lapped weatherboard siding. The building has garage doors on its east end. Four 12-light windows are placed on the building's west elevation. The garage .is a plain, utilitarian structure and appears to be in excellent condition. Olinger House/Mortuary At the south end of the parcel is the George W. Olinger House (built in 1914), and an adjacent, tall, brick mortuary chapel (built in 1969). The Olinger House is constructed of brick, painted off-white. The house is not a pure example of a distinct architectural style, but may best be classified as either Mediterranean or Italian Renaissance Revival-style (Pearce 1983:49-50; McAlester and McAlester 1988:397-401). Distinctive stylistic elements include a red clay tile-clad hip roof with wide eaves and modillions, brick masonry walls, and the use of paired Tuscan columns. The irregular-plan 1-story house/mortuary is covered by a flat-crested hip roof clad with red Spanish roof tiles. The roof has wide overhanging boxed eaves embellished with modillions. The facade is symmetrically arranged and features a full-width enclosed/glazed front porch, with a projecting central portico. This portico is equipped with paired Tuscan columns. The enclosed front porch is fenestrated with a series of large 18/2 windows. The centrally-placed main entry contains a wide, painted wood door with six lights. A semicircular eyebrow dormer is placed directly above the main entry. The house's fenestration is varied and consists mainly of multi-light double-hung and sash-and-transom windows. The west elevation features a projecting porch with a brick rail and a substantial tile-clad hip roof supported by paired short Tuscan columns. This porch provides access to a side entry equipped with glazed multi-light double-doors flanked by tall 8-light sidelights with thin muntins. This entry is reached via a concrete stoop covered by a modem wooden wheelchair ramp with a balustrade railing. A two story rear wing contains a ground floor garage and an upper story living space. This wing is covered by a widely-overhanging pyramidal hip roof that closely matches the style of the dwelling's main roof. This rear wing may have been added in 1949 - the date provided by the Jefferson County Assessor's record as the date of construction for this building. The entire house contains 4,449 ft' of space. The Olinger house/mortuary sits on an elevated pad. It is accessed on the front/south side by paired concrete walkways flanked at curbside by terra-cotta-clad ornamental lampposts, containing lion's-head elements in relief and supporting large electric lanterns. The main entry is reached by climbing a concrete stairway, flanked by brick side walls supporting tapered lamp posts holding spherical white-frosted globe lights. According to information compiled by Kevin Murphey, January 6, 2006 Olinger Property Historical Evaluation Page 5 as well as a 1925 photograph, large replica Classical statuary also was displayed on the grounds near the house. A short distance east of the Olinger house is a tall, rectangular-plan, painted brick chapel building covered by a flat-topped hip roof. The roof has wide boxed eaves but lacks modillions similar to those installed on the Olinger house. The chapel was built in 1969, and its design effectively mimics the design of the house. The main mass of the building measures 32 ft wide x 76 ft long. A substantial porte-cochere projects from the front (south side) of the chapel over a driveway, and consists of a flat-topped canopy supported by Tuscan columns. The chapel's facade is symmetrically arranged, with a large entry set in a semi-circular-arched opening. Double, painted wood doors are installed in this entryway beneath a multi-light, semi-circular-arched window. Tall, 3-part stained glass window panels are placed near each end of the facade. The building's long east and west elevations are fenestrated with a series-of large, multi-light, semi-circular arched windows placed at cornice-level, to illuminate the interior. Attached to the chapel's west elevation is a 1-story wing of painted brick with a flat-topped hip roof. The rear (north) elevation features a portico with paired Tuscan columns and wide concrete steps providing access to a set of doors similar to those on the front of the building. Pergola The site also contains a long (approx. 200-300 ft-long) historic pergola colonnade structure closely paralleling Wadsworth Boulevard. The pergola was in existence as least as early as 1925, based upon a historic photograph of the property with that date at the Denver Public Library. The pergola structure is composed of parallel rows of massive, cylindrical stuccoed columns with square bases, each approximately 2.5-3' in diameter. Seventeen sets of these columns or piers support an arbor structure consisting of longitudinal rails affixed to the tops of the columns, above which are placed perpendicular 4x4" cross-pieces and thin (lath-size) longitudinal stringers. This arbor was originally a wood structure, but in recent years it was replaced by more weatherproof vinyl fencing/siding. At present the arbor does not support any vines. The pergola covers an approximately 8' wide concrete walkway, which is cracked and deteriorating in many places. The pergola was used by Olinger family members as well as pedestrian passers-by on Wadsworth Avenue. Pump house A small historic brick pump house is located on the east side of the pergola, towards the north end of the property. The pump house is square in plan, measuring approximately 10'x 10'. Its walls are constructed of brick masonry, painted off-white. The building is covered by a low-pitched pyramidal hip roof with wide overhanging boxed eaves. An entry equipped with what appears to be the original painted wood panel door, is located on the east side of the pump house. This entry is accessed by a small concrete stoop. Sealed window openings are present on the west and south sides of the pump house. The pump house appears to be in very good condition. Landscaping The Olinger property presents a park-like appearance. The parcel also contains deliberate landscaping including sunken garden areas and numerous large trees, and large asphalt-paved parking lots behind (north of) the Olinger House/Mortuary and Chapel. January 6, 2006 Olinger Property Historical Evaluation Page 6 Historical Summary This site was included in the 160-acre homestead of Asahel H. Beach and Anastacia Baselas, patented on February 15, 1870. This homestead occupied the SE'/4 of Section 26 in Township 3 South, Range 69 West. Beach's and Baselas' land was purchased in 1872 by William and Moritz Barth, who ten years later (1882) platted it as Barth's Subdivision. The subdivision contained four 40-acte blocks, each divided into'four 10-acre lots. Lot 3, where the Olinger house was later built, was acquired from the Barths by Simon Brown at an unknown date. Brown may have built the small wood frame farmhouse that remains on the property today. On March 1, 1911, George W. Olinger purchased the west half of this lot from Mr. Brown (Warranty Deed, Book 177, p. 50, Jefferson County Clerk & Recorder's Office, Golden). The parcel was located opposite Crown Hill Cemetery, which was started by Mr. Olinger in 1907. George Washington Olinger was born on February 22, 1882 in Santa Fe, New Mexico. In 1890, George accompanied his parents, John W. and Emma Olinger, to Denver.where the senior Olinger opened a mortuary at Fifteenth and Platte streets. George began working in the mortuary in 1897, and following his father's death in 1900, George Olinger and his mother became partners in the undertaking business. Upon his mother's death in 1932, George W. Olinger took complete control of OiingerMortuaries, Inc. In addition to carrying on the thriving mortuary business started by his parents, Mr. Olinger became involved in real estate development in the Wheat Ridge area as well as a leader in boys' organizations in the Denver area. George Olinger was responsible for the development of Crown Hill Cemetery in 1907, a new mortuary at Sixteenth and Boulder Streets in Denver in 1908, and the Olinger Gardens subdivision (1919). In the 1920s he also created a number of other residential subdivisions, including Wellshire (or Welshire), Bonnie Brae, and Indian Hills (Rocky Mountain News 1954; Olson 1998). Mr. Olinger played an important role in the creation and maintenance of organizations founded to help build boys' character. He founded Highlander Boys in 1916, was instrumental in constructing the Temple .of Youth (later the State Armory), and he donated land and helped found Geneva Glen camp. Mr. Olinger also served as director of boys'-work for Rotary International In 1930 Mr. Olinger expanded the mortuary business by leasing a building at Speer Blvd. and Sherman Street in Denver. Two more branches were added in 1952 and 1953. According to the Wheat Ridge News (copies cueated at Wheat Ridge Historic Park), the Olinger house was built in 1914, three years after Olinger acquired the parcel (Olson 1998). The property also contained an older farmhouse and barn, which were put into use as a caretaker's residence. Elaborate landscaping, including sunken gardens and a long pergola, was installed on-the 4:45- acre property. George Olinger resided at this address in rural Wheat Ridge with his wife Margaret (whom he married in 1904), until his death in 1954. Following the passing of George W. Olinger, his daughter Gwendolyn and her husband Francis VanDerbur took control of Olinger Mortuaries, Inc. In 1968 Margaret Olinger died, and shortly thereafter, in 1969-70, the former George Olinger house was converted into another mortuary. At that time, a chapel and parking lots were added to the property. In 1987 all properties owned by Olinger Mortuaries Inc. were sold to Morlan International, Inc., who in turn sold them in the same year (1987) to S.C.I. of Houston, Texas. The property was recently sold to Sevo Miller, a real estate company who has intentions of removing the extant buildings and developing homes on the parcel. January 6, 2006 Olinger Property Historical Evaluation Page 7 Significance Evaluation National Register of Historic Places Established in 1966 under the National Historic Preservation Act, the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) is the Nation's official list of cultural resources worthy of preservation. To be considered significant, cultural resources must be over 50 years old, possess sufficient integrity, and meet one or more of the NRHP evaluation criteria. These evaluation criteria, as specified in Title 36 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 60, are as follows: "The quality of significance in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, and culture is present in districts, sites; buildings, structures, and objects that possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association and -A. That are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or B. That are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or C. That embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or D. That have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history." Evaluation/Justification: The Olinger house/mortuary has been altered by construction of the adjacent chapel building, by probable construction of the two story rear wing, and modifications to the projecting west side porch. Additionally, replacement of extensive gardens with :parking lots behind the former house/mortuary, has'also negatively affected 'the property's integrity. These changes have reduced the property's integrity to the extent that it cannot qualify for inclusion on the NRHP. Chris Geddes of the Colorado Historical Society, who is reviewing- a potential NRHP or SRHP nomination submitted by Kevin Murphy, has also questioned the property's alleged architectural significance, and whether or not the residential property best represents the contributions of the Olinger family to the history of the Denver metro area. For all of these reasons, FHU does not believe that the property is intact or significant enough to qualify for recognition on the NRHP. Colorado State Register of Historic Prooerties The Colorado State Register of Historic Properties is a listing of the state's significant cultural resources worthy of preservation for the future education and enjoyment of Colorado's residents and visitors. Properties listed in the State Register include individual buildings, structures, objects, districts and historic and archaeological sites. The State Register program is administered by the Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (OAHP) within the Colorado Historical Society. The Society maintains an official list of all properties included in the State Register. Properties that are listed in the National Register of Historic Places are automatically placed in the State Register. Properties may also be nominated separately to the State Register without inclusion in the National Register. January 6, 2006 Olinger Property Historical Evaluation Page 8 The State Register Nomination Criteria are as follows: "Significance in history, architecture, archeology, and culture is present in buildings, sites, structures, objects, districts, and areas that possess integrity of location, setting, design, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association and that meet one of the following criteria: A. The property is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to history; or B. The property is connected with persons significant in history; or C. The property has distinctive characteristics of a type, period, method of construction, or artisan; or D. The property has geographic importance; or E. The property contains the possibility of important discoveries related to prehistory or history." (Colorado Historical Society/Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation 2000). Evaluation/Justification: For reasons similar to those stated above concerning NRHP-eligibility, the overall Olinger property does not appear to possess enough integrity, architectural significance, or historical significance to qualify for the NRHP. However, the pergola structure represents a relatively rare property type in Colorado which may qualify by itself for recognition on the SRHP. Additional research about pergolas in Colorado may be required to substantiate such a nomination. Although the pergola's arbor structure has been replaced in recent years by non-historic materials (vinyl siding and fencing), the 34 vertical columns are intact. Property owner consent is required to officially list any property on the SRHP. City of Wheat Ridge-Historical Landmarks The City of Wheat Ridge's commitment to, and regulations for, historic preservation are presented in Article IX, Section 26-900-915 of the Wheat Ridge Municipal Code. The stated purpose and intent of Article IX is "to establish and preserve historic landmarks for the educational, cultural and economic benefit of Wheat Ridge citizens, by preserving, protecting, enhancing, and regulating the use of buildings and structures:that are reminders of past eras, events and persons important in local, state or national history, which are landmarks in the history of architecture, which provide examples of the physical surroundings in which past generations lived or which are archaeologically significant. The Code also asserts that "it is not the intention of this article to preserve every old building or structure in the city, but rather to provide a process to evaluate and protect only those buildings and structures deemed to have historical significance" (Sec. 26-90; Ordnance No. 2001-1215, § 1, 2-26-01). A historic landmark is defined in the Code as "Any structure or improvement designated as historic under the provisions of [Article IX]." The criteria by which properties are judged for Historic Landmark designation by the City of Wheat Ridge are as follows: "The [Wheat Ridge] city council shall consider whether the structure is of particular historical, architectural, cultural or archaeological significance which: January 6, 2006 Olinger Property Historical Evaluation Page 9 A. Exemplifies or reflects the broad cultural, political, economic or social history of the nation, state or community; or B. Is identified with historic persons or with important events in national, state or local history; or C. Embodies distinguishing characteristics of an architectural type inherently valuable for the study of a period, style, method of construction or of indigenous materials or craftsmanship; or D. Is representative of the notable work of a master builder, designer or architect whose individual ability has been recognized; or E. Is recommended as an historic landmark by the Wheat Ridge Historical Society board of directors. (Source: Sec. 26-906; Ordnance No. 2001-1215, § 1, 2-26-01). Evaluation/Justification: Unlike the'NRHP and SRHP, the City of Wheat Ridge's Historic Landmark ordnance appears to lack an explicit integrity requirement. The Olinger property contains the house of one of the community's leading historical persons, who contributed to the development and success of the Denver area mortuary business started by his father in 1890. George W. Olinger also was important for his role in developing real estate in the Wheat Ridge area, and for his leading role in boys' organizations in the Denver metropolitan area during the early 201h century. For these reasons, The Olinger House probably qualifies for designation as a City of Wheat Ridge Historical Landmark under Criterion B. The Olinger house is not an excellent example of a particular. period; style, construction method, materials, or craftsmanship, nor does if appear to be the work of a "master' architect. The Olinger house/mortuary therefore does not embody architectural significance;per Landmark criteria C or D. =Other features on theproperty appear to be potentially eligible for designation as municipal Historical Landmarks, including the pergola on the west side of the property, and the farmhouse and barn (2960 Wadsworth Blvd.) located at the north end of the property. The pergola is a substantial, highly visible; and noteworthy example of this rare property type in Colorado, and-it may qualify individually for Landmark designation under Criterion C. The farmhouse and barn are very well-preserved examples of late 19th Century agricultural buildings in Wheat Ridge. Given the former importance of agriculture to the community, the farmhouse/barn at 260 W. 29' Avenue appears to qualify for Landmark designation under Criteria A and C. However, in order to meet Criterion A, more research concerning the pre-Olinger use of the farmhouse and barn would be required. At present, little is known about the agricultural history of the property prior to 1911, when George W. Olinger acquired it. Conclusions Based on a limited review of available documentation and a site visit, FHU concludes that the 4.45- acre Olinger Property does not meet the NRHP eligibility criteria, and with the possible exception of the pergola, the property also does not qualify for inclusion on the SRHP. In either case, property owner consent is required. With respect to the City of Wheat Ridge's Historical Landmark program, the lack of an integrity requirement and the local focus of the ordinance points to several options for designation. The former Olinger house or the entire parcel (containing other associated features) appears to meet Criterion B of the Landmark ordinance for identification with a demonstrably important person in Wheat Ridge history: George W. Olinger. Under the same January 6, 2006 Olinger Property Historical Evaluation Page 10 municipal ordinance, the pergola would likely qualify by itself as a Local Historical Landmark under Criterion C, and the well-preserved 1892 farmhouse and barn would potentially qualify for designation as a Local Historical Landmark under Criteria A and C. Additional research concerning the pre-1911 use of the farmhouse and barn would be required in order to determine if they meet Criterion A of the City's historic preservation ordinance. January 6, 2006 Olinger Property Historical Evaluation Page 11 References Cited Bureau of Land Management General Land Office records online database (http://www.glorecords.bim.cov). Chase, Donald M. 1999 History of Colorado Funeral Enterprises by City or Town, from Colorado Funeral Directors Association website (hftp://www.cofda.orq/history/denver.htm). Colorado Funeral Directors Association, Englewood, Colorado. Colorado Historical Society/Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation 2000 State Register Bulletin, How to Apply the Nomination Criteria for the Colorado State Register of Historic Properties. Available online at CHS/OAHP website. Denver Post 1919 "Sixty-five Acres Bought by Olinger for Building Sites." The Denver Post, May 8, 1919, p. 9. Geddes, Chris, National and State Register Historian, Colorado Historical Society, personal communication with Jason Marmor on December 30, 2005. Jefferson County Assessor Property records and footprint sketches for 7495 W. 29th Avenue, Parcel No. 022433. Leonard, Stephen J., and Thomas J. Noel 1990 Denver. Mining Camp to Metropolis, Niwot, Colorado: University Press of Colorado. McAlester, Virginia, and Lee McAlester 1988 A Field Guide to American Houses. New York:, Alfred A. Knopf. Murphy, Kevin F. Preliminary Property Evaluation Form for the Olinger Residence/Mortuary (5JF1910), September 21, 2005. Olson, Robert J. 1998 Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Historic Architectural Survey Form for 5JF1910, the George Olinger House/Mortuary, 7495 W. 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge. On file at the Colorado Historical Society/Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Denver. 1999 Wheat Ridge Historic Structure Survey, Draft Survey Report, April 1999. Prepared for the Wheat Ridge Historical Society. State Historical Fund Grant # 98-01-043.On file at the Colorado Historical Society/Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Denver. Pearce, Sally, with contributions by Merrill A. Wilson 1983 A Guide to Colorado Architecture. Denver: Colorado Historical Society. Plat of Barth's Subdivision of the SE'/< of Section 26, T3S, R69W. Filed December 2, 1882 by William Barth and Moritz Barth et al. Scale 1"=200'. Book 1, p. 26A. Jefferson County Clerk & Recorder's Office, Golden. January 6, 2006 Olinger Property Historical Evaluation Page 12 Rocky Mountain News 1954 "Civic and Mortuary Leader George W March 10, 1954, p. 8. Olinger, 72, Dies." The Rocky Mountain News, Rocky Mountain Photo Company 1925 View of the George W. Olinger home at 29'" and Wadsworth. Rocky Mountain Photo Company Denver 14914, dated May 4, 1925. On file at Denver Public Library, Western -History Department, as well as online (http:gphotoswest.or, /cgi-bin/imager?10024411+X- 24411). Willits, Warren C. 1899 Willits Farm Map. -Denver: W.C. Willits, Scale 1"=3,300 ft. On file at the Denver Public Library, Western History Department, Denver. Worth, Claudia 2005 City of Wheat Ridge Local Historic Landmark Designation Nomination Form for the George Olinger House. Submitted by Caudia Worth, President of the Wheat Ridge Historical Society to the City of Wheat Ridge on November 5, 2005. 3 pp. plus attached 1998 site form prepared by Robert J. Olson. City of Wheat Ridge Of WHEA r P Planning & Development a o 9500 W. 29'" Ave. m Wheat Ridge, CO 80215 303-235-2851 www.ci.wheatridge.co.us ~Ot OR POO ARTICLE IX. HISTORIC PRESERVATION Sec. 26-901 Intent and purpose. A. The purpose of this Article is to establish and preserve historic landmarks for the educational, cultural and economic benefit of Wheat Ridge citizens by: Preserving, protecting, enhancing, and regulating the use of buildings and structures that are reminders of past eras, events and persons important in local, state or national history, which are landmarks in the history of architecture, which provide examples of the physical surroundings in which past generations lived or which are archaeologically significant; and 2. Ensuring that the historic character is preserved in development and maintenance of such buildings and structures; 3. Stimulating educational, cultural and spiritual dimensions by fostering the knowledge of Wheat Ridge's heritage and cultivating civic pride in the accomplishments of the past; and 4. Cooperating with state and federal historical preservation efforts. B. It is not the intention of this Article to preserve every old building or structure in the city, but rather to provide a process to evaluate and protect only those buildings and structures deemed to have historical significance. (Ord. No. 1997-1102, § 1, 12-22-97) Sec. 26-902 Supplement to zoning provisions; other code sections unaffected. A. The requirements of this Article are in addition to all other zoning provisions contained in this Chapter 26 and are not to be construed so as to waive any other existing and applicable zoning regulations, unless specifically excepted by city council pursuant to section 26-907, and shall apply to all zone districts in place at time of adoption of this ordinance or hereafter. B. Where a conflict exists between the provisions in this Article and other provisions of this Code, the provisions set forth in this Article shall not affect the provisions set forth elsewhere in this Code. (Ord. No. 1997-1102, § 1, 12-22-97) Sec. 26-903 Definitions. A. For the purposes of this Article, the following words and terms are defined as set forth herein: Community significance variance. A variance from height, setback, square footage or any other code provisions determined by city council as necessary to preserve the historic character and/or significance of an affected historic landmark. GED\53027\357901.09 -236 Development application. Any permit, site plan, rezoning, variance application or administrative relief that would change the character or appearance of property and/or improvements thereon. Exterior architectural feature. The architectural style, design, general arrangement and components of all of the outer surfaces of an improvement as distinguished from the interior surfaces enclosed by said exterior surfaces, including, but not limited to, the kind, color and texture of the building material and the type and style of all windows, doors, lights, signs and other fixtures appurtenant to such improvement. Historic preservation. The protection, rehabilitation, restoration, renovation and construction of buildings, structures and objects significant in Wheat Ridge history, architecture, archaeology, engineering or culture. Historic landmark. Any structure or improvement designated as historic under the provisions of this Article. Inventory. A listing of buildings and structures within the city which reflect an earlier time or which contribute to the overall historic character or heritage of the city, including a list of historic landmarks designated pursuant to this Article. Landmark alteration permit. Any permit issued by the city pertaining to construction, alteration, removal or demolition of a building or feature within a designated historic landmark or landmark site. Major change. Alteration to an historic landmark which may fail to preserve, enhance or restore the exterior architectural features of the landmark by affecting the special character or special historical, architectural or archaeological nature of the historic landmark which gave rise to the historic designation. Minor change. Alteration to an historic landmark which preserves, enhances or restores the exterior architectural features of the landmark or site. A minor change does not adversely affect the special character or special historical, architectural or archaeological nature of the historic landmark or site. Owner. Any person, persons or entities having such right to, title to or interest in any parcel of land or improvement so as to be legally entitled, upon obtaining the required permits and approvals from the city agencies having jurisdiction over building construction, to perform, with respect to such property, construction, alteration, removal, demolition or other work as to which such person seeks the authorization or approval of the preservation specialist or the city council. Preservation specialist. The person under the supervision of the city manager who prepares presentations for city council meetings at which historic designation applications are considered and serves as the initial recipient of historic landmark designation and development applications. Reasonable return. The capacity, under reasonably efficient and prudent management, of earning a reasonable return on an investment. GED\53027\357901.09 _237 Restoration. Putting a building or structure back into the form it held at a particular date in time as nearly as possible, the accomplishment of which often requires the removal of work which is not "of the period." Structure. Any building, improvement, shelter or any other construction built for the shelter or enclosure of persons, animals or chattels or any part of such structure when subdivided by division walls or party walls extended to or above the roof or without openings in separate walls. Wheat Ridge Historical Society. A Colorado nonprofit corporation, recognized as tax- exempt pursuant to section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, or any of its successors, the general purpose of which is to gather information about historic persons, events and places in the City of Wheat Ridge, provide for historic preservation, and to educate and stimulate interest in such persons, events and places. (Ord. No. 1997-1102, § 1, 12-22-97) Sec. 26-904 Benefits of historic landmark designation. A. Historic landmarks may be eligible for grants for preservation, restoration or stabilization from the city, state or other granting organizations. B. The city, in collaboration with the Wheat Ridge Historical Society, in its discretion, may write recommendations for such grants or monies and assist property owners in applying for state or national historic designation. C. The city council, in its sole discretion, may make available economic incentives to historic marks. The city council is authorized to seek and accept private or public grants which would enhance historic preservation. D. The city shall supply a plaque of appropriate size which states that a designated historic landmark is a Wheat Ridge Historic Landmark and protected under the provisions of this Article. E. If appropriate, the city council may grant a community significance variance. (Ord. No. 1997-1102, § 1, 12-22-97) Sec. 26-905 Process for designation of historic landmark. A. Any individual structure or building within the city is eligible for designation as an historic landmark. B. Inclusion of any property in the National Register of Historic Places as provided in the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 shall mean that the landmark is automatically designated a local historic landmark subject to the protections of this Article. C. An application for historic designation may be submitted by the property owner, by a member of the Wheat Ridge Historical Society Board of directors or by a member of city council. The application shall be on a form as provided by the city preservation specialist and shall be submitted to the city preservation specialist who shall first refer the application to the Wheat Ridge Historical Society Board of directors for review and recommendation. If the GED\53027\357901.09 -238 application is made by anyone other than the property owner, the city preservation specialist shall promptly send the owner a copy of the application via certified mail. The property owner may file a written objection to the application with the preservation specialist within thirty (30) days after the date the preservation specialist mails the owner a copy of the application. D. In accordance with its own rules and bylaws, the Wheat Ridge Historical Society board of directors shall review the application for historic designation and shall make a recommendation to city council on whether the city council should grant historic designation. Failure of the Wheat Ridge Historical Society board of directors to provide a recommendation within thirty (30) days of the date that the application is sent to it for referral shall be deemed to be a recommendation for denial. E. Upon receipt of a recommendation from the Historical Society board of directors, or after the passage of thirty (30) days from the date an application is sent to the Historical Society for referral, the preservation specialist shall schedule a city.council public hearing on such historic designation applications. Notice of the public hearing shall be sent to the owner of the property via certified mail, shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation and be posted on the property by a sign which conforms with the requirements of section 26-109(3) at least fifteen (15) days before the date of the public hearing. Such notice shall state the time and place of the public hearing, state that an application has been filed for historic designation of the structure and describe the location of the landmark by street address, legal description, map and/or other descriptive information sufficient to reasonably advise the public and/or any interested persons of the pendency of the application. If the property owner files a written objection to the application, city council shall hold said hearing within forty-five (45) days of the date of receipt of the recommendation of the Historical Society board of directors or within forty- five (45) days after the passage of thirty (30) days from the date the application is sent to Historical Society for referral. (Ord. No. 1997-1102, § 1, 12-22-97) Sec. 26-906 City council designation. A. Following public hearing, city council may designate by ordinance historic landmarks in the City of Wheat Ridge to accomplish the purposes of this Article. In making such designations, city council shall consider the recommendation of the Wheat Ridge Historical Society Board of directors, the testimony and evidence presented at the public hearing and the following criteria: No structure or building shall be granted historic designation unless city council determines that the property owner will retain the ability to earn a reasonable return on the property which is the subject of the application; and 2. The city council shall consider whether the structure is of particular historical, architectural, cultural or archaeological significance which: a. Exemplifies or reflects the broad cultural, political, economic or social history of the nation, state or community; or b. Is identified with historic persons or with important events in national, state or local history; or GED\53027\357901.09 _239 C. Embodies distinguishing characteristics of an architectural type inherently valuable for the study of a period, style, method of construction or of indigenous materials or craftsmanship; or d. Is representative of the notable work of a master builder, designer or architect whose individual ability has been recognized; or e. Is recommended as an historic landmark by the Wheat Ridge Historical Society board of directors. B. The city council may grant historic designation in the presence of one or more of the criteria set forth in 2a-2e. above, but need not find that all of those criteria are met. C. If an application for historic designation is submitted by either a city council member or a member of the Wheat Ridge Historical Society board of directors and the property owner does not desire historic designation and so indicates by filing a written protest before the scheduled public hearing, historic designation shall be granted only upon a three-fourths vote of the entire city council. D. It shall be unlawful to demolish, destroy or undertake any major change to a structure which is the subject of a pending historic designation application until such time as city council has determined whether such designation shall or shall not be granted. E.. The planning department and the public works department shall maintain an. inventory of all designated historic landmarks and all structures which are the subject of pending applications for historic designation. Upon receipt of an application for either a permit or a request to carry out any new construction, alteration, removal or demolition of a structure on or in an historic landmark or on a structure which is the subject of a pending application for historic designation, or a zoning change or development plan change, the planning or public works department shall forward such permit application, request or information to the preservation specialist within ten (10) working days. No permit shall be issued or request granted by said departments before a landmark alteration permit has been issued by either the preservation specialist or city council or until a determination has been made by city council not to grant historic designation. (Ord. No. 1997-1102, § 1, 12-22-97) Sec. 26-907 Community significance variances. A. In addition to historic designation, or at any time after granting historic designation, the city council may, upon application therefor, grant community significance variances to historic landmarks. B. When a community significance variance is sought after historic designation has already been granted, the notice and hearing requirements for granting such a variance shall be as set out in section 26-905(E) except that the notice shall state that an application has been filed for a community significance variance. C. The criterion for determining that a variance should be granted is that the variance is necessary to preserve the historic character and/or significance of the affected structure. GED\53027\357901.09 -240 D. The variance shall remain in effect only until such time as the use which created the historic character of the landmark changes or ceases. Failure to maintain the subject of a variance in good repair and working order may cause a rescission of the variance. (Ord. No. 1997-1102, § 1, 12-22-97) Sec. 26-908 Limitations on development affecting historic landmarks. A. No person shall carry out or cause to be carried out on any historic landmark any construction, alteration, removal or demolition, or make any changes that would impair the historic nature of the historic landmark without first obtaining a landmark alteration permit therefor in accordance with this Article. B. Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent any construction, alteration removal, or demolition necessary to correct an unsafe or dangerous condition of any structure, or parts thereof where such condition is declared unsafe or dangerous by the city building or planning and development departments, or fire department and where the proposed measures have been declared necessary by the city manager to correct the dangerous condition, as long as only such work which is necessary to correct the condition is performed. Any temporary measures required by the city under this section may be taken without first obtaining a landmark alteration permit, but a permit is required for permanent alteration, removal or demolition of an historic landmark. C. If the city provides the applicant with a landmark alteration permit, the applicant must apply for a building permit within six (6) months of the date of the permit. D. If the city denies a landmark alteration permit, no person may submit a subsequent application for the same construction, alteration, removal or demolition within one year from the date of the final action upon the earlier application. (Ord. No. 1997-1102, § 1, 12-22-97) Sec. 26-909 Initial processing of applications for landmark alteration permits. A. Applications for a landmark alteration permit shall be submitted to the preservation specialist on a form as provided by the preservation specialist and shall contain such information as required to assure full presentation of the facts necessary for proper consideration of the permit. B. Landmark alteration permit applications for minor changes shall be determined by the preservation specialist in accordance with this Article. Landmark alteration permit applications for major changes shall be determined by city council in accordance with this Article. C. The preservation specialist shall determine whether the landmark alteration permit application requests a "major change" or a "minor change" to the historic landmark: (Ord. No. 1997-1102, § 1, 12-22-97) GED\53027\357901.09 -241 Sec. 26-910 Minor change landmark alteration permits. A. In determining whether to grant an application for a minor change landmark alteration permit, the preservation specialist shall grant the permit if the requested alteration to a historic landmark would preserve, enhance or restore the exterior architectural features of the landmark or site. The proposed work shall not adversely affect the special character or special historical, architectural or archaeological nature of the landmark or site. B. Any person aggrieved by a determination of the preservation specialist to grant or deny a minor change landmark alteration permit may appeal such determination to the city council within ten (10) working days of the date of the preservation specialist's determination by filing an appeal with the office of the city clerk. Such appeal shall state the grounds for appeal, Within thirty-five (35) days of the date the appeal is received in the office of the city manager, the city council shall set a date for a hearing on such appeal, which hearing shall be held no later than sixty (60) days after the date the appeal is received in the office of the city manager. The city council shall have the power to overrule the preservation specialist's decision by a vote of a majority of the city council. The determination of the city council following the appeal hearing shall be issued within forty-five (45) days of the hearing and shall be a final determination for purposes of Rule 106, Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure. (Ord. No. 1997-1102, § 1, 12-22-97) Sec. 26-911 Major change landmark alteration permits. A. The city preservation specialist shall schedule the permit application for a major change on the next available agenda of the Wheat Ridge Historical Society board of directors. The preservation specialist shall notify the permit applicant of the date of the Historical Society board of directors meeting at which the application shall be considered via first class mail at least fifteen (15) days before the date of the meeting. B. At the conclusion of the Historical Society board of directors meeting at which the Society considers an application for a landmark alteration permit to make a "major change," the Historical Society board of directors shall forward to city council a recommendation it either grant or deny such permit. C. The city council shall schedule a hearing on such major change landmark alteration permit application. Notice of the hearing shall be as set forth in section 26-905(E) except that the notice shall state that an application has been filed for a major change landmark alteration permit. Such notice shall be sent to the permit applicant via first class mail and shall be published as in section 26-905(E). D. During the city council hearing on the major change landmark alteration permit application, city council shall consider the recommendation of the Historical Society, the evidence or testimony presented at the hearing, and whether the proposed work will materially adversely affect the special character or special historical, architectural or archaeological nature of the historic landmark. City council shall make its determination to grant or deny the major change landmark alteration permit within sixty (60) days of the date of the hearing and shall notify the applicant of its vote within fifteen (15) days of the date of the vote in writing, including the major change landmark alteration permit if the city council has voted to grant such permit. (Ord. No. 1997-1102, § 1, 12-22-97) GED\53027k357901.09 -242 Sec. 26-912 Maintenance of historic landmarks. All structures, architectural features, buildings and improvements which are designated historic pursuant to this Article shall be maintained in good repair so as to prevent deterioration. Failure to maintain all historic structures, architectural features, buildings, and improvements in good repair shall constitute a violation of this Article. (Ord. No. 1997-1102, § 1, 12-22-97) Sec. 26-913 Removal of historic designation. A. An application for removal of historic designation may be submitted by the owner of the property which holds such designation, by a member of the Wheat Ridge Historical Society board of directors or by a member of city council as in section 26-905(C). The application shall be processed in the same manner as in section 26-905(C) through 26-905(E) and section 26-906 except that the criteria for removal of historic designation shall be that: The property has ceased to meet the criteria for historic designation because the qualities which caused it to be originally listed have been lost or destroyed; 2. Additional information shows that the structure or property no longer meets any of the criteria for historic designation contained in section 26-906. B. Properties removed from the state register or the National Register of Historic Places shall not be considered to have been automatically removed from the city's historic inventory without formal action of the city council. C. If either a city council member or a member of the Wheat Ridge Historical Society board of directors submits an application for removal of historic designation and the property owner does not desire removal of historic designation and so indicates by filing a written protest before the scheduled public hearing, historic designation shall be removed only upon a three-fourths vote of the entire city council. (Ord. No. 1997-1102, § 1, 12-22-97) Sec. 26-914 Recordation of memorandum of action. A. Within fifteen (15) days of a city council designation of an historic landmark, the city shall cause to be recorded with the Jefferson County Clerk and Recorder a Memorandum of Action which sets forth the following: Address and legal description of the real property affected by the historic landmark designation which underlies the structure which has been designated as historic; 2. A statement that such real property is subject to Article IX, Chapter 26 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws pertaining to the historic landmark requirements. GED\53027\357901.09 -243 B. Within fifteen (15) days of the date that the city council removes an historic designation, the city shall cause to be recorded with the Jefferson County Clerk and Recorder a Memorandum of Action which sets forth the following: 1. The information contained in subsection (A)(1) above; and 2. A statement that the owner of such real property is no longer required to conform with the historic landmark requirements of Chapter 26, Article IX of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws. (Ord. No. 1997-1102, § 1, 12-22-97) Sec. 26-915 Violations and penalties. A. Any person who is an owner as defined in section 26-903 or a manager of property subject to any provision of this Article shall be responsible for compliance with all provisions of this Article. Historic designation may be subject to a review for loss of designation as a result of a conviction of the owner for a violation of this Article. B. Any person violating any provision of this Article shall be subject to a fine of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) or by imprisonment not exceeding one year, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each and every day during which a violation continues shall be deemed a separate offense and shall be prosecutable and punishable as a separate offense. C. The imposition of any penalty hereunder shall not preclude the city or any proper person from instituting any proper action or proceeding to require compliance with the provisions of this Article. In case any building or structure is erected, constructed, externally reconstructed, externally altered, added to or demolished in violation of this Article, the city or any proper person may institute an appropriate action or proceeding to prevent any unlawful erection, construction, reconstruction, exterior alteration, addition or demolition. (Ord. No. 1997-1102, § 1, 12-22-97) GED\53027\357901.09 -244 POSTING CERTIFICATION CASE NO. PLANNING COMMISSION / CITY COUNCIL / BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (Circle One) 4 HEARING DATE: I I`i /0 -T I Kau aM M W /t Y ~t f (name) residing at 366-0 u F w"- C-T (address) as the applicant for Case No. hereby certify that I have posted the Notice of Public Hearing at " 3475 JRTU A ~W~ .jtie5usons~c~ 3?01" T Wsr~~ (location)" on this a day of 20 0 and do hereby certify that said sign has been posted and remained in place for fifteen (15) days prior to and including the scheduled day of public hearing of this case. The sign was posted in the position shown on the map below Signature: NOTE: This form must be submitted at the public hearing on this case and will be placed in the applicant's case file at the Department of Planning and Development. J J_ R-2 U X eal Re. ~ =m HAYWAKP PARK D- g x Z NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge CITY COUNCIL on January 9, 2006, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the Municipal Building at 7500 West 29" Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. The following cases shall be heard: Case No. WHL-05-01: An application filed by the Wheat Ridge Historical Society for approval of designation of a local historical landmark for the buildings and property zoned R-2 (Residential-Two) and located at 7495 W. 29th Avenue and legally described as follows: THE WEST ONE-HALF OF LOT 3, BLOCK 1, BARTH'S SUBDIVISION, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. Kathy Field, Administrative Assistant ATTEST: Pamela Y. Anderson, City Clerk To Be Published: Wheat Ridge Transcript Date: December 22, 2005 9 d d ~ C ~ m C U ~ y V N ~ N C ra+ 'd y d u E a c j Z NI RN' m C O: I ~I K) O ~ g N ~ w y(1 O orv N d o c Co o E U U to N a C C g J U~ O m ~ra0 d E ~ Ro$0 N i J~c'm r N 9 m~i9 N V N a N N m a of tO a a O- a i Z ` a r --~~~:e E mN d' C 0 U d Q' m ~ IL ~ 00000 0 q Z M1 m m Ln N -0 Q' M M w O u a m "0 O ❑ O o ~ O W O E °o F U z' Q Q W p o LLI C9 n- 3: j n i _ LL N~ O'S Q Z a C3 z M1 }o uJ Z FMS g ~ U h ~ a ~I . The City of 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 303/235-2846 Fax: 303/235-2857 Ridge December 21, 2005 Dear Property Owner: This is to inform you of Case No. WHL-05-01, a request for approval of designation of a local historical landmark for the buildings and property zoned R-2 (Residential-Two) and located at 7495 W. 29th Avenue. This case will be heard by the Wheat Ridge City Council in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue. The meeting will be held on January 9, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at 303-235-2846. Thank you. Planning Division. \SS -ci-ens-001\usersUfield\Kathy\CC"TSWUBNOTIC\005\wh10501wpd 01/02/06 MON 17:28 FAX 3104407751 JPGM ADMIN 16001 I a THE J. PAUL GETTY MUSEUM 1200 GE7-rY CENTER DR YE, SurrE 1000 LOS ANGELES, CA 90049-1687 Faesimile Date: ]'anuary2, 2006 To: Meredith Reckert Senior Planner 1'.ity of Wheat Ridge FAX: :103-235-2857 From: Kevin Murphy Message: Meredith, :?lease see the following petition pages, which I have had notarized today. I will bring the originals to the meeting on Monday. 411so, you can expect my package of presentation materials to arrive Wednesday. Let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Thanks, KM Number of pages sent (including cover): 9 Please cheek to see if you have received all telecopied sheets. If not, send us a message via Paz at 310-140-7752 01/02/06 MON 17:28 FAX 3104407751 JPGM ADMIN We the undersigned support thr! preservation of and landmark designation effort for the Olinger property at 7495 W. 29th Avenue: ICJ 002 Name ividress Si a Date 1 10V r)- 14" ° a s ~t,c r Ad &E. i 8~z~"3 fit.-. end ~e v ~ 07.b L Ae~~o b5d ~a X 12 -0 'a ! ~ 440 / 6 e~Ccklks 5f tJ1 y nss lJ - -1 O5. lz~r~~ 5 - gsIs W ~Lfig s CitovNG- r y i 301d v L.. - - - .D. p tL u1.G~- Gte-APt-CZ-$f . . ~7~ l7 7P 90 gk/ JA~l J t7 ? .~.le,.,r►7j ~~c.~.et --lk-sr r.-u-. t 061 A. . /~~a AS V i ca~~ r+ ~o n~ r~.. a raw, YvX w~ t pU2 ' ` 01/02/06 MON 17:29 FAX 3104407751 SPGM ADMIN CALIFORNIA ALL•irURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT personally appeared 1 f -r ^r r• m td&jo Namets) of $10 State of California 1~~.%* Oe.aJ ss. County -1 On O G _ before me, ?r~ (0 / NSt? 7t1~ tyon},2y, a Dam Name lak Tine W Dineen 16.0., `Jane Doe, Nelary Gublk'9 &personally known to me P-proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(} whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same In his/hsr/thsir authorized capacity({es), and that by hisRw&eeir signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and offici seal. Place Nco Gee Abme ~algnmlun 01 01ey PuNICW Diary Puallc OPTIONAL DETTIJO k N3EfH Commission it 1383063 Notary Public - California Los An®eies County amycommExalre s Nov 3, 2CA6 Though the Information below is not required bylaw, It may prove valuable to persons retying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached D ument Title or Type of Document; _ e T/ T7 o n.) Document Date: J,? 4/" a -S ~ Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed btr Signer(s) Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer - Millais): ❑ Attorney in Fact Top of Numb hers ❑ Trustee El Guardian or Conservator E2 Other: ❑ Partner-❑Llmited ❑C3eneral Signer Is Representing: Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer -Title(s): ❑ Partner Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney in Fact Tap of mumb here ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: IM oo3 Pi 2004 NBllonal Naarv AssedeBM • B35C Oe Sao Awe., P O. Bua 2A02 • ChelBNrorth, CA 91313-9402 I[em No. 5007 Pecrder. Ca117oIFFTBe 1-800.9764927 01/02/06 MON 17:29 FAI 3104407751 JPGM ADMIN We the undersigned support the preservation of and landmark designation effort for the Olinger property at 7495 W. 29th Avenue: IM 004 Name i N 1 Address Signature Date 9L IL 07 y0~~in y~ S 'l g 41 2 JALIGlCI.... e 1~R.~~ ..~A±rw .3oy0 ~ta~l Slr aL O r ! 2 X ^!S'a r - .1 U~~4eri Sz I + 3 ao dd f.v a/a~ o s 3035. p217 -5 T /gym L-3a5 675 48 / IA C k. ri. I~.A CG MN//EQ d LPA ST ~c~r . 3030 Q~C .f~ I~~ 12~-a~ d /pla'1 Joan Ulln e r a 9.75_ f2c~&ff- /.z 4 . 56 itrj ~5C11W ~ ~ I~_'j(o7++~j 2-Zl-rh5 1 7~ - n cD _~n. 1 I. _ A 'Zoe oy'6 J i ~ !Q rY ?3 'v . w..~c~~✓e ~er,c~ I o s t~-~- _ q1 ~ 3so w, ~LckCL a'I( _ G,~aGvL~ ~1 7 0 o~ ~S M-S A~ 3 u.+vw7„ mil''"' " 3 01/02/08 MON 17:30 FAX 3104407751 JPGM ADMIN CALIFORNIA ALL-FrURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California J ss. County of "rr~.tt r+~strr~, ~or~rszri On v to before me, Dale , j Name mid Wile of o par (e.g., -JUG Does mary PabIk I personally appeared iC-personally known to me ry„8c'TTIJO Ke NSFTH Commission 1 1,383063 e ; iu q Notary Public - California r Los Angeles County MY Comm. F-xpim.; Nova, 2,,006 r C!i-proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s4whose name(a) Ware subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/sha/ttsay executed the same in his/he[(thei[ authorized capacity(ters), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(* or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument W THE S my hand and official sea Wave Notary See Abow algnapre of Imy PUNIC OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, It may prove valuable to persons retying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment or this form to another document. Description of Attached D ent Title or Type of Document t-'T rT 6 Document Date: V. IG'- Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ individual ❑ Corporate Officer-Title(s): ❑ Corporate Officer--Title(s): ❑ Partner Limited ❑ General ❑ Partner Limited 7.1 General ❑ Attorney in Fact TmosEammi~ op of thumb here ❑ Attorney in Pact Top at rhumb We ❑ Trustee El Trustee [I Guardian or Conservator C3 Guardian or Conservator F1 Other: ❑ Other. Signer Is Representing: _ I Signer Is Representing IR 005 ~D 200a Neganal Notmy Aesoolagon • °25C De ado AVa., P.D. Box 2902 •ChalawaM, CA 9 7 27 3-2401 Item Na. SOUT RaoNer, Call Tdl-Pree 1.6DWO-S 27 01/02/06 MON 17:31 FAX 3104407751 JPGM ADMIN [~J006 We the undersigned support the preservation of and landmark designation effort for the Olinger property at 7495 W. 29th Avenue: 1 D~ Ole 60 Name Address Si nature ( Date X75 ~lLkVA vY d27o1 (fie d 6- N`17 ' . ~ raj 71 ti %tl ~ T?17ES L/ ~2GY / 51 7 I I.G '2 .-/ri 7~I. T• , I2 •_23=L~~. . ~ . 1710 0 707,79. I 80 .¢4aa'Lf? e9 3olc? S <lsb S1-• _v 82 85 86 f g6fycv~ 4jS-)'q w. 3SP _ t zY/oar 87 06tJ L C /i sg 3t" Ptak r~_ _ 0/rs!~ vrC~ r 1 > 0 C 6s 90 _ off . IRTur~ 1AQ Z 2 92 93 (cY L7 ~II af~ . D/ : / U V w- B I. 94. y p \ II y ( 95 _ L 96 - - 97 99 100 ~ rJ'a,f~h9Q, 0 755 ~.ti,I'I'4` 02~~ W _ 2-2~1-QSc~+~ - - 01 101 102 A L•~ ~ I ~Cc K 4J 0 •t 7 6 r o 3 c~,Q s _ id -a ~ cs . _ MS : 10 3 c~ u mac; ~c n All, K*M u_. r. nw.""LT)V acs- v ~1 ,~,1-e' 1 01/02/06 MON 17:31 FAX 3104407751 JPGM ADMIN CALIFORNIA ALL42URPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California as. County of , GY On D & before me,"rT }f-'t Daot Name a tle of Oilkee 0-9..'Jene D69. IN P.O., Gpersonally appeared OEFTIJO KINSfTH • Cgrnmisai0 it 138nom r Notary Public; - California Los AngelDs County h1YCorr~m.LxF ov3.2OOb[rg irasN . ` Name(,) c1 Signer(s) Ca'Krsonally known to me Etproved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(a)-whose name(s) is/aresubscdbed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he%k1e/tkeey- executed the same in his/her(t_heu; authorized capacity(ies), and that by hislherAhzif- signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. PMOe Notary Sea I $i9ruWro I Notary PuDlk OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could p1 avanr fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another dooumant. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: _ Ott J"iTi Or>J Document Date: ) L 1 `1 6 c Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capscity(iss) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer-Title(s): ❑ Partner Limited ❑ tieneral ❑ Attorney in Fact Tap of thumb here ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator D Other: Signer Is Representing: I Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer-Title(s): ❑ Partner Limped ❑ General ❑ Attorney in Fact Top of thumb here ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other. Signer Is Representing: ID007 0 2004 NaUmal Notary Aeeod00011.9350 De Sala Aw., P.O, aez 2308 • Chat-wodh. CA 91913R402 Item Na 5907 Reorder: call Toll-Free 1-60D-$76-6827, 91/02/06 MON 17:32 FAX 3104407751 JPGM ADMIN 008 We the undersigned support the preservation of and landmark designation effort for the Oling property at 7495 W. 29th Avenue: Date _ Name Address Signature 103 ~ 443 5 4~ • ~4 10 AUe7y /_~071L e-/i¢ ,776,1 105 4ZZ.S f ens ~{i...~ ~d TrrlGCt~t/ ~Z Z~ 10 10 108 109 110 - - 112 113 114 115 _ _ 116 117 118 119 120 123 124 - - - 125 - 126 127 - - 128 129 130 131 132 - - - 133 134 . - - - 135 - - oaf-<•~~ n~ t~-iu ~....i Ems. ~*-a✓li'~^r : K~-'~--zZy.~ 3 vrr~>r9 Ar~eN~~.1~,.+eS.c.,..a~ sir. ~ ,01/02/06 MON 17:32 FAX 3104407751 JPGM ADMIN CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California R oog ss. County of rvl~~ On a before me, ITT t~ ! KS~ If ~er?~' Dale Name arW Wile at ofr~mr (v.g., •da~ta Cee, No,ery Pubn personally appeared t U I PJ impersonally known to me - BETTIJO i:INSEI;~ C:ommi Aon It 1'H:ilvai i,ll;JF ~r Nof ary Puhhc C:oltlrnrlr. r :l Los AnyQlcs ioun V ` NIy Coftvi txplius Nov3, L+pfroved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(eywhose nams4isfarasubscribed to the within Instrument and acknowledged to me that he/stleFthW executed the same in his/hefAhe9r authorized capacity(ies), and that by hi0mrAheir signature(s)•on the instrument the persons} or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s)- acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Place Notary Seal 4bwe signior of NCIry, Public OPTIONAL Though the information *owls not required bylaw, Itmey prove vaivable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document Description of Attached Document , Tge or Type of Document: e T/ r-/ 0,4 _ Document Date: 11z t u/ /as- _ Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capaclty(les) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Olficer-Title(s): ❑ Attorney in Fact Top of thumb here El Trustee C) Guardian or Conservator Other: p Partner-❑ Limited Ll General Signer Is Representing: Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer - Title(s): ❑ Partner Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator f] Other. Signers Representing: Top of thumb hcm 5907 neer 02006 Wtlond Neo7r~taeon-8360 1)$ Sele Are.. P.0.9o%240'i•Charswatih, CA 91313.ga02 Item Ne, rJen Coll TWO-Free 1.300.378.882] I I si IV. I Al Al xl J,L x $ x ~ x A x 1,~ s 8. N W N T OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WHEAT RIDGE COLORADO R x 8 ~ ~ $ ~ ~ 9 aw zcao flL ~ ~ ~ uEl- x l n R . 8 . ffi W" $ 8 PARCEULOT BOUNDARY (DESIGNATES OWNERSHIP) WATER FEATURE * DENOTES MULTIPLE ADDRESSES 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN (APPROXIMATE LOCATION) SE 26 O 100 200 iW 400 feet J 1 DEPARTMENT OF MAP ADOPTED: June 15, 1994 >°O PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Last Revision: September 10, 2001 NW 20 Al 91 1 el =1 =1 $I €1 N El al , 151 N N al K W w U J U I l3 I I I ?I NW I I 26 I °I =1 =1 $I sI N N 31 ' el ml ml el 3l 31' I` I I Ql RX_a R-1 n ' R- W 91UP d E $ m \ n 9g S R r f 2 g `n 3m5 rJUB $ W ~ 1 m l AN 1Y, sil T ° W3MAW AL Y W3U II AVE o T I I I _ ~ s R-2 ~ y 1= ~ R I N 0 U N W w 0 W 0 0 0 U Z Z 7 G HAYWAKD PARK CITY HALL I R-2 R-2 CUP-95-1 OFFICIAL . PARCELILOT BOUNDARY OWNERSHIP) ZONING MAP (DESIGNATES WHEAT RIDGE -WATER FEATURE COLORADO ' DENOTES MULTIPLE ADDRESSES IZI 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN (APPROXIMATE LOCATION) DEPARTMENT OF ^ 9` ' R-• W z 5T3 Q (J) ~o TZ Dz s 3 R- ~ ~ 3 a i? SE 26 N W N O 100 200 '00 400 acct MAP ADOPTED: June 15, 1994 0 EELSBUI (4 HOLT , ULLEVI engineeringparbst, to mans] ortdt on solutions December 27, 2005 Mr. Alan White, Director Community Development Department City of Wheat Ridge-Municipal Building (City Hall) 7500 W 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 RE: Proposal to Complete a Significance Evaluation of the Former Olinger Property in the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado Dear Mr. White, on behalf of Felsburg Holt & Ullevig (FHU), I am pleased to provide you with a cost proposal to complete a historical significance evaluation of the 4.5-acre former George T. Olinger property, located at Wadsworth Boulevard and 29th Avenue in Wheat Ridge, Colorado. The property contains several historic buildings, including a farmhouse built c. 1897, an associated barn, and the Olinger Mansion (built in 1914 and later used as a mortuary), which was evaluated in 1998-1999 by the Wheat Ridge Historical Society as eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). This finding of significance has not been subject to formal review or concurrence by the Colorado Historical Society/Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation. The objective of the current investigation is to provide an independent evaluation of the historical and/or architectural significance of the Olinger property and buildings. This effort will result in the preparation of letter report summarizing the evaluation methods and criteria employed as well as the results of limited archival research and field review. No inventory forms will be prepared as part of this effort. Both historical and architectural significance will be analyzed. The report will also discuss the findings with respect to the City of Wheat Ridge's historic preservation ordnance as detailed in Chapter 26 of the Wheat Ridge Municipal Code. The report will provide information needed for a review of proposed redevelopment of the Olinger property at a Wheat Ridge City Council meeting scheduled for Monday, January 9, 2006. The site and its individual buildings and features will be assessed in terms of condition, integrity, and significance. Limited archival research will be conducted at the Colorado Historical Society/Office f Archaeology and Historic Preservation; the Western History Department of the Denver Public Library; the Jefferson County Recorder's and Assessor's offices, and at the Wheat Ridge branch of the Jefferson County Library system. The data collected will be used to evaluate the site's significance in terms of the City's Historical Landmark criteria as well as the criteria of the NRHP and the State Register of Historic Properties (SRHP). All tasks will be completed by FHU Cultural Resource Specialist Jason Marmor, whose education and experience meet the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards for historians and architectural historians. Mr. Marmor has successfully completed numerous historical survey, documentation, and evaluation projects in Colorado. He is currently conducting historical resource investigations of numerous properties in Wheat Ridge for two major transportation projects (the Northwest Corridor Environmental Impact Statement and the 1-70/32" Avenue Interchange Environmental Assessment). 6300 South Syracuse'Way, Suite 600 Centennial, CO 80111 tel 303.7211440 fax 303,721.0832 www fhuenp eom info@fhuen8.coni December 27, 2005 Proposal - Olinger Property Historical Evaluation Page 2 An itemized cost estimate is presented below: Labor Task 1- Field Review Cultural Resource Specialist - 4 hours @ $85/hr ......................................$340.00 Task 2 - Archival Research Cultural Resource Specialist-16 hrs @ $85/hr ........................................$1,360.00 Task 3 -Letter Report Preparation Cultural Resource Specialist - 8 hrs @ $85/hr .............................................$680.00 Administrative Assistant-1 hr @ $65/hr $65.00 Total Labor ...............................................................................................................$2,445.00 Expenses Mileage - 100 miles @ $0.485/mile $48.50 Tntal Exnenses $48.50 TOTAL COST $2,493.50 FHU welcomes the opportunity to be of service. We will complete the work outlined above and deliver the letter report to the City of Wheat Ridge by Friday, January 6, 2006. Please let us know if special access arrangements are required to enter the subject property. If you have any questions please call me at (970) 219-9155 or (303) 721-1440. Sincerely, Felsburg Holt & Ullevig Jason Marmor Cultural Resources Specialist Meredith Reckert From: Alan White Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 9:03 AM To: Meredith Reckert Subject: FW: Landmark Status for Olinger Site a Must Mere, For the record. Alan White Community Development Director 303-235-2844 -----Original Message----- From: Karen Berry [mailto:khberry26@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 8:16 PM To: chambs@4edisp.net Cc: Alan White Subject: RE: Landmark Status for Olinger Site a Must Dear Mr. and Mrs. Chamberlain Thank you for your comments. Because a land use application has been submitted for the Olinger property, I cannot comment on the application outside the public hearing process. However, I will send your comments to the planning department so they can be made part of the public record. In addition, please feel free to express your comments at public hearings that will be held concerning this matter. Sincerely, Karen Berry >From: Cheryl & Keith Chamberlain <chambs@4edisp.net> >To: khberry26@hotmail.com >Subject: Landmark Status for Olinger Site a Must >Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 08:32:42 -0700 >MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) >Received: from mail.4edisp.net ([205.208.207.27]) by >bay0-mcll-f9.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); >Sun, 11 Dec 2005 07:30:27 -0800 >Received: from [10.0.1.6] [70.57.56.88] by mail.4edisp.net with ESMTP >(SMTPD32-8.15) id A61234430OD2; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 08:30:26 -0700 >X-Message-Info: 6sSXyD95QpXFXBU4y1S8UWOD8RW34gXZYAgc4qgnuWE= >X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) >Return-Path: chambs@4edisp.net >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Dec 2005 15:30:27.0092 (UTC) >FILETIME=[CFC6B540:01C5FE67] >Dear Ms. Berry: >I urge you to vote yes to approve landmark status for the historic >Olinger home and mortuary site. at 29th and Wadsworth. I research and >write about North Denver history and have written three articles about >the George Olinger family for the North Denver Tribune. From beginnings >in 1890 in the Highland neighborhood, they expanded their mortuary >chain throughout the Denver metro area to become one of the area's >prominent businesses. George Olinger also became nationally prominent >in the mortuary business. His philanthropic work included founding the >Highlander Boys organization, generous monetary support for charities >and hospitals and oversee Red Cross service during World- r II. >The family built the elegant and architecturally significant home at >29th and Wadsworth and it has been a Wheat Ridge landmark for decades. >The Olinger home and property would be a wonderful asset for the city >of Wheat Ridge and it would be a terrible mistake to lose it for >another strip mall or office park. It it a treasure that current and >future residents of your city can enjoy for generations. Its public >uses might include a library, a historic and cultural center or a park. >During the 1960s the city of Denver demolished many historic buildings >in its rush towards urban renewal. It seemed like a good idea then, but >with the passage of time, Denverites and their leaders came to realize >that they had made a terrible mistake, one which could never be undone. >I urge the current leaders of Wheat Ridge to heed Denver's hard-earned >lesson by voting to save one of your very few historic and architectural treasures. >I urge you to approve landmark status for the historic Olinger home and >mortuary site at 29th and Wadsworth. Thank you for your consideration. >Keith Chamberlain >(303) 477-2491 >chambs@4edisp.net on the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how to get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement 2 1~,, , zQoS t: 4t~ b ~9 a~ b~~ ~ rs . ~r qk~ (o Urv N-s& 41.11 M1 El hr) Wa-A bO U- ko 4,• Or& Ch.zx (o Lf~ WkP{uP ~ QS~ Tr, o.Vcpda.nr.(- Lvere- RaArw-L, Mt Kc FatfD b ©l~e v~ j V hsh(i,c Y Taw V f-:gyl'~~ ' p C'(►Iur~ln~~~p, (t~t~' ~hrxrlod4nt GU/~~ulsc ~[eJ~ -QRA , ~-f0f1e ~ tj 9~1C►1u 1~5 F°(~j StCPrcf (~?`~ce~ 0 Q 5~, Its Q a~ P4 &I rrP ~Q~in 1'11u.vFh.y, ~2Bcf'S ar ~ ~ rcllo , K~ uxm ~y a-4 -►4w~ is, aa~ Pc. W QA ~I t flli 1 r~eiaxe Jli Avrtc JOA r~r~+ k S~"~"s w TA &"IIHI M,k~ arc~l ~Icr, whim y VY~eeff U-VA 404 l ~V 0"N r._f Y V ,,II II^1 ~ ro r 'LS{sbltsL. 'I'S~art~ pa~9~naev~ PLO 0n~ Gtor4 ado Qla v.u~a r , p Vf\x- dj~ Wark °UtV` S~jv"Yan 4k a-+ e 4.4 P p- 4k`LA)kb 4W "~t -f- Ot ) Qw".r ~3\S' DY~~I+-X 3~CJC - ct v, Oaf cL J-ru-e u ear. be 4-" S ~$F~ , ~r(9AX Q (O(J cat 4-o s-ak,6w~J, mark .~5 ao a ~O 0.1~ -4P~•~ r c$ esFx ci, a v\ (Q oeR r orFS ~u C! i ) o "Ah Q 661, ~Y o~.2s 1 si on . p,~ (9-~~ l,lFl 0. h ~ ✓v~6u S ~ 1 ' D1 Cd ~CiYI~IQJ co so ~,rnbexS ~ h ~ ~ v- law , 1 ~~s Michael A. Sheldon & Associates, LLC Attorney and Counselor at Law 5290 DTC Parkway, Suite 160 Greenwood Village, CO 801 11 (303) 770-0200 (303) 220-8027 - Telefax Michael A. Sheldon, Esq. December 13, 2005 VIA Telefax & Hand Delivery Mr. Alan White, Director of Community Development Department City of Wheat Ridge 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 1 ' /vlo5' r, RE: Formal Objection to Wheat Ridge Historical Society Local Historic Landmark Designation of Wadsworth Exchange Property Dear Mr. White, Please accept this letter on behalf of the owners of the above referenced property as the formal objection pursuant to Section 26-905 C of the City Code for the following reasons: 1. The request for local historic landmark designation is not timely made. It has only been made after a formal application of the property owner, DHE Wadsworth, LLC and ASM Casa, LLC for the development of this property for retail uses. The Wheat Ridge Historical Society had an opportunity to purchase this property when it was on the market prior to our Clients purchase and initiation of its Land Use plan application. 2. The Wheat Ridge Historical Society's efforts are in conflict with the City's comprehensive plan which shows retail uses for the property, as well as the proposed widening of Wadsworth Blvd., and the required streetscape implementation. 3. The Wheat Ridge Historical Society has not followed appropriate federal and state procedures in terms of both its own creation and its nomination of our client's property for local historic landmark designation. 4. The property is not historic by objective standards. The funeral chapel was constructed in 1970, the pergola is now held in place by concrete and plastic, and the interior of the "big house" has been gutted over the years in favor of contemporary upgrades. Michael A. Sheldon & Associates, LLC Page 2 December 13, 2005 Mr. Alan White Our Clients have attempted to meet with the Wheat Ridge Historical Society to discuss several items, including moving the smaller northern house to a location of its choosing, but the Society has refused to meet with the property owner or its representatives. We intend to be present at the Wheat Ridge Historical Society Board of Directors meeting now scheduled for December 14th at 7:30pm to further express our objections, and at a City Council public hearing, presently scheduled for January 9, 2006 on any recommendation that he Wheat Ridge Historical Society may make to the City Council on its petition for historical Landmark designation to further express our objection pursuant to Section 26-906 of the Wheat Ridge City Code. At such City Council hearing, the property owner will take the position that no structure or building shall be granted historic designation for the reason that the property owner will not be able to retain the ability to earn a reasonable return on the property which is the subject of the application and further, the provisions of Section 26-906 (A) (2) cannot be met by the application. Finally, the property owner desires to implement Section 26-906 (C) which requires a 3/4th vote of the entire City Council on this application since the property owner does not desire historic designation by virtue of the filing of this written protest. before the scheduled public hearing. If anything further is required in connection with this letter of objection, please do not hesitate to call. Yours truly, Michael A. Sheldon & Associates, LLC Michael A. Sheldon, Esq. Cc: Mr. Gerald Dahl, Esq. Mr. Andy Miller Mr. Mike Pharo Wheat Ridge Historical Society, Claudia Worth, President Meredith Reckert From: Winifred Ferrill [winfer@lakewood.org] 12- Z w5' Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 5:34 PM To: Meredith Reckert Cc: Nina Johnson Subject: Building movers Hi Meredith; The building mover we have always used since I've been at the Heritage Center is: _ Pat McKune Professional Building Movers, Inc. 10780 W. Montgomery Avenue Littleton, CO 80127 303-979-0880 office 303-978-1941 fax 303-944-9287 cell I have asked Lyle Miller of the Colorado Historical Society to send you alist of historic building assessors. One that we have used in the past to do a survey on a structure is; Cathleen Norman, 303-985-2599. Her email is; prespub@earthlink.net Let me know if you do not hear from Lyle. Win Ferrill Win Ferrill Historic Preservation & Lead Curator HCA Division City of Lakewood 303-987-7853 1 Page 1 of 1 Meredith Reckert From: Meredith Reckert Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 9:17 AM To: mplandplan@aol.com' Subject: Stuff Good morning, Laura- A couple of updates regarding your projects: 1. Medved - Regarding billboards, I have found pictures dating from the fall of 1996. This is when many of the existing billboards were amortized. It did not affect those located south of the proposed new dealership. Do you also want me to check building permit files for anything there? 2. 1 spoke with Claudia Worth about meeting with the Wadsworth Exchange team prior to the Dec. 14 WRHS Board meeting. She said that there are 15 members of the Board of Directors and that she didn't feel comfortable meeting with them ahead of time as she didn't want to have to represent the Board's views. She indicated that it was appropriate for the team members to attend the Dec. 14 meeting and that they would be able to air their perspective on the designation at that time. It is a meeting that I will try to attend as well. Let me know if there is anything else you need in the mean time. I will be around tomorrow and Friday but have doctor appointments both days mid to late afternoon. M 11/22/2005 Page 1 of 1 Meredith Reckert From: Kathy Field Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 3:27 PM To: Meredith Reckert Subject: Board Meeting Claudia Worth called to report that the Wheat Ridge Historical Society Board will meet on the historical landmark designation of the Olinger property on December 14th at 7:30 p.m. at the museum (4610 Robb St.). The public is invited. In the future, you my can contact Claudia (VP-WRNS) at 303-467-0023 or Charlotte Wetzel (President-WRNS) at 303-423-0989. Kathy 11/22/2005 {~W"~°'ao of 7500 West 29th Avenue The City o ~ m Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 ylrheat Ridge 303/235-2846 Fax: 303/235-2857 November 17, 2005 Dear Property Owner: The City of Wheat Ridge recently sent you via certified mail a copy of a historic designation nomination for property under your ownership at 7495 W. 29`x' Avenue. The nomination was submitted by the Wheat Ridge Historical Society and is for the site and structures located on it. It is staff's understanding that you as the property owner do not consent to the nomination application. Attached to the submitted nomination designation form was a copy of Article IX. (Historic Preservation) of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws. Pursuant to Section 26-905. C. of this code section, a property owner who does not consent to the nomination application may file a written objection to the application within thirty days after a copy is mailed to you. The historic landmark designation is granted by the Wheat Ridge City Council through a public hearing process. In the event a written protest to the historic landmark designation is filed by the subject property owner(s), a three-fourths vote of City Council is required to approve the designation. Your deadline for submittal of a written objection is 30 days after notification is sent or December 14, 2005. Please contact me at 303-235-2848 if you have any questions regarding the process. Sincerely, Meredith Reckert, AICP, Senior Planner Mailing list: M & E Financial 200 Spruce Street, #200 Denver, CO 80230 M & E Financial 650 S. Cherry Street Suite 310 Denver, CO 80246 ASM Casa, LLC DBE Wadsworth, LLC 7495 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 ~ ` W ~ lY C w ~ d C d v N d 9 y a d U U d i ° ~ o a rv c z j ~ .U - C ml 7 I I ~ >I C d 0- Imo 0 0 . x 00 a t O ~p aa0 ' 1 .0 ? mom. N O a V x x v ~ d m U a m v Q o ~ E a Y M m u U c~ g . o 0 ra O O w~ p=1 IT 5 : r W U~ 00 u 00 ~ o- 2 u 0U U ~N C3 Cin N v~vw Q ' ~ N W 4 > 00 W U "=LLw d ~ n O V1 Vl ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ E Z ul r, N -43 -0 Cl) v 0- ° co Ir a Ir n- M W o C a co m• Ir m• m• C7 c 00 m m 00 Q - 0 TWO E F- > (1 z' u0- co Q W z ° Ir . u^ ° 0 W 3: U) r-I a°^ o o ^ > N W 0 m a a m m O Q Z 0 a -A O -0 a O W N Una L ~I N O E W d N C~ Y O a. 0 a m d m U 0. 4. O UO z m F T L N a U 0 E a z R 0 F N N~ CD C> CD Er z 'Y°1 m m W C a U 6 % ® PO % W A ] G y 9 o° ^ A a a O r - v d~ r O O Ej Y CD y D r W y n _ . o- ❑ Ln s. % Y S < m m i m W . n n 0 n .o rr R 1 ba ~ ~ a 0 w3 ° ~ n m ppi~ 3 m ~ 0 CD 41 CD -0 O V O1 7 3 m N ~ 2 V1 ~ a ~ n 1 ~ ~ ~ c ~ (D n ~ n m m m W m O ~ fy° , .o r ~ a C" r o, - Y " o I ~ m f1 C N ° ~ D E m Mao - - - ON Ell m m r o L r % m p I p ~ A9 % O N m W a I ~p o- 0 w w .a a - i % i ~ O ~ A D m° m W ~ m m m nn ~ ail oil Do O, f p~ nm m H~ Z 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 303/235-2846 Fax: 3031235-2857 November 14, 2005 Wheat Ridge Historical Society Board of Directors c/o Claudia Worth 4650 Oak Street Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 The City of Wheat Ridge ~~aFWMEgTgQ___ aataaaa° RE: Case No. WHL-05-O1/Request for historic landmark designation for property located at 7495 W. 29`a Avenue Dear Historical Society Board of Directors: The Community Development Department has received an application for nomination for historical designation for property located at 7495 W. 29"' Avenue. The application for designation was prepared by Claudia Worth. The affected property owners do not consent to the application and have been notified by certified mail that a nomination application has been submitted for their property. Pursuant to Section 26-905.D., the Wheat Ridge Historical Society board of directors shall review the application for historic designation and make a recommendation to City Council as to whether historic designation should be granted. The recommendation must be made within 30 days of receipt of this referral. Failure to make a recommendation within the specified time period constitutes a recommendation of denial. In the past, property owners have been notified when and where WRHS is meeting to consider the nomination application. Please advise us so we can notify the property owners when your review will occur. The property in question is roughly 4.2 acres in size and has multiple buildings on it which vary in age from about 25 years old to over 100 years old. The designation nomination does not specify which portions of the property and which buildings are under consideration and only the address of the old mansion is cited (incorrectly) on the nomination application. The Historic Architectural Survey Form attached to the nomination form refers to all buildings and other accessory structures (pergola, well house) on site. Please be as specific as possible as to which portions of the site your recommendation pertains to and which criteria apply to which site component. The criteria cited were: 1) Represents notable work of master builder, designer or architect, 2) Embodies distinguishing characteristics of an architectural type, period, style or method of construction, 3) Embodies distinguishing characteristics of indigenous materials or craftsmanship and 4) Identified with historic persons. In support of criteria #1, please provide the name of the master builder, designer or architect who participated in construction of the building(s). Also, the nomination application specifies that the following documentation has been used to determine the history (Jefferson County Assessors Records, Wheat Ridge Historical Society information and newspaper articles from the Denver Post and Rocky Mountain News); however, no documentation was submitted except for the Historic Architectural Survey Form. The more background information provided, the easier the history of the property, structures and former property owners is to substantiate. If you have questions or would like to discuss this further, do not hesitate to call me at 303-235- 2848. Sincerely, Meredith Reckert, AICP Senior Planner c: WHL-05-O1 2 Property appraisal system Parcel ID:39-264-06-001 Status:Active dress 07495 W 29TH AVE WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 cress: SAME ADDRESS AS PROPER Owner Name ASM CASA DBE WADS: Page 1 of 1 Nei vhhorhood: 2405 BARTHS, COULEHAN GRANGE, WHEAT RIDGE AREA11 Name: 064800 Date 12-16- 1Maps associated with Schedule: map39-264 ndf. Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF's. Location Map/Additional Information. Send mail to s esso @co iefferson co us with questions or comments about this Web site. Copyright @ 2005, Jefferson County, Colorado. All rights reserved A Map of How to Get to Our Office Web sim information current through: 11-05-2005 Version 3.5.0 - Release Date: SEPTEMBER 2005 11/R/2005 Lys ; ~"..ren+~rai r x'~z Inform.at~on _ Previous 5 OF 25 Next M uRRAY D A"L KuFCm"r=mm Eis-rE 2 IZENAtJ E:) LLP 0 2401 15th Street Suite 300 Denver, Colorado 30202 Phone 303.493.6670 Fax 303.477.0965 CONFIDENTIAL & PRIVILEGED ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION TO: Mayor & Council FROM: Gerald E. Dahl, City Attorney DATE: November 11, 2005 RE: Application of Wheat Ridge Historical Society I want to take this short opportunity to advise you concerning the referenced application which is a pending application by the Wheat Ridge Historical Society for designation as a historic landmark of the Olinger Mortuary Property at W. 29th Avenue and Wadsworth Boulevard. The Society is permitted to be the applicant by Sec. 26- 905.C of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws. Article IX of Chapter 26 of the Code establishes requirements for designation of historic properties. The mechanism for such designations requires review by the Council, following notice and hearing. I advise you that this application is quasi-judicial in nature. This is because: (1) it concerns a specific property, (2) will potentially affect the rights of the applicant, and importantly, the property owner, and (3) is reviewed by you at a hearing which is preceded by posted and published public notice and mailed notice to the owners. These characteristics make this application similar, for due process purposes, to rezonings and special use permits. As Council is aware, when an application is quasi-judicial, you must refrain from ex-parte contact with the applicant, the property owner, and the public outside of the public hearing. Of course, you are permitted contact with staff at any time. As always, if this memorandum raises questions, please do contact me. WRCA 051 Hi, Kevin- The historic designation process is somewhat different than our usual land use case process such as a zone change. The initial 30 day period is for a referral response from the historical society to the designation nomination. It also allows a non-consenting property owner the opportunity to file an objection. At this point, no City Council public hearing dates have been set for either of the processes (zone change versus historic designation). I would expect that both of them would occur after the first of the year due to noticing requirements and Council meeting dates cancelled due to the holidays. I will fax over a copy of the legal protest provisions. Keep in mind that this applies only for the zone change request. - Let me know if you need anything else. Meredith 303-235-2848 -----Original Message----- From: Kevin Murphy [mailto:Kmurphy@getty.edu] Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 5:54 PM To: Meredith Reckert Subject: Olinger Project Update Dear Ms. Reckert, Today I had telephone discussions with both Chris Geddes of the Colorado Historical Society and Claudia Worth, of Wheat Ridge, so I feel relatively up-to-date with the goings-on concerning the Olinger property. However, I do have a couple of questions I think you may be able to help with. Can you tell me the time line for the Landmark Application that has been filed? I realize there is a 30-day deadline, however I am not sure exactly what that means. Will the actual hearing with the City Council be in 30 days, or is this deadline just for notification (and if so, when is the actual hearing, if the date has been set)? I am preparing some information I'd like the Council to see and want to be sure they have time to peruse it in advance. Also, what is a "20% Protest for Zoning" ordinance? Could this be faxed to me at 310-440-7752? I would like to circulate a formal petition regarding the future of the site among area residents, and was wondering if this was something I should incorporate into my "strategy." I hope not to exacerbate an already hot issue, but obviously this one warrants a great deal of tenacity on the part of the neighbors and other concerned citizens - thank you for your patience, it's greatly appreciated. With best regards, Kevin Murphy Meredith Reckert From: Alan White Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 9:51 AM To: Meredith Reckert; gdahl@mdkrlaw.com Subject: FW: Olinger Mortuary Project Attachments: OfingerDescrip.doc; DSCN2209.jpg; Mortuary-i.jpg 00 [a Im OlingerDescrip.doc DSCN2209.jpg (148 Mortuary-i.jpg (29 KB) KB) (328 KB) Mere, FYI. Jerry, Randy wanted you to warn Council the landmark process is quasi-judicial and to not talk to or email Mr. Murphy. Alan White Community Development Director 303-235-2844 -----Original Message----- From: Kevin Murphy [mailto:KMurphy@getty.edu] Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 3:47 PM To: bftireco@aol.com; Sangjw@aol.com; tomisabbtt@aol.com; Alan White;: Patrick Goff; councilorschulz@comcast.net; egokey@comcast.net; klpa@comcast.net; khberry26@hotmail.com Cc: SenatorEGP@aol.com; Randy Young; Iris3580@comcast.net; < Subject: Olinger Mortuary Project Dear Council Members, As you may already know, Claudia Worth of the Wheat Ridge Historical Society has filed an Application for Preservation with the City of Wheat Ridge for designation of the Olinger Mortuary site, 7495 West 29th Avenue (directly across the street from City Hall). The passage of this motion will grant the former residence of George and Margaret Olinger historic status within the guidelines of the city of Wheat Ridge, and open the doors for other long-term historic designations and benefits. Residents not only in Wheat Ridge, but Arvada, Golden, Westminster, Lakewood, as well as Denver, are greatly concerned about the site's future, as it is a one of the most profound historic estates in-Wheat Ridge. Everyone would breath easier knowing they could count on the City Council to approve this measure so preservation and conservation efforts could proceed with this legendary landmark, and the risk of it being demolished to make room for a strip mall eliminated. I don't need to remind you how well the passage of this motion would reflect upon the Council, and Wheat Ridge in general, as preservation of extremely rare examples of the area's rich cultural heritage should be a top priority. Additionally, the prospect of the City utilizing funds allocated for open space parcels to purchase the site should be thoroughly investigated, as it is obvious that the integrity of the entire community would be greatly compromised by thoughtless development of this corner. For your information I have attached a document which profiles the legacy of the Olinger family since their arrival in Denver in 1890, plus an architectural description of the remaining elements of their magnificent estate, as well as a couple of photographs. Thank you kindly for your careful consideration of this effort. We will be distributing a packet of background information to you shortly, but do not hesitate to contact Claudia or myself with questions you may have in the meantime. Also feel free to pass this e-mail along to any other Council members. 1 Sincerely, Kevin Murphy Wheat Ridge STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE AND ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION OF OLINGER RESIDENCE, 7495 WEST 29TH AVENUE The Olinger Family and Their Denver Legacy The city of Denver was formed in 1860 by the combination of the Auraria and Denver City camps at the confluence of the Platt River and Cherry Creek. These camps were established when it was reported that gold was discovered in Cherry Creek in 1858. This news created a huge boom in population and the development of what is now the Downtown, Lower Downtown, Capital Hill, Auraria Campus, and Chessman Park areas. As with any burgeoning pioneer community, one of the mainstay businesses is the funerary and undertaking concerns. This drew John W. Olinger (1851-1901) and his wife Emma (1861-1932) from Santa Fe, New Mexico, to the area in 1890 to establish one of the regions' foremost business entities, initially located at 15'b and Platt Streets. In 1908, the Olingers built the first building in the area to be constructed as a mortuary in the Rocky Mountain region at 2600-16s' Street (16"' at Boulder) and was operated by John W.'s son George W. Olinger Sr. (1882-1954) and mother, George's wife Margaret (1881- 1968) and John W's wife Emma. The growth of the business was marked in 1930 by the purchase of the Yeager Mortuary, located at Speer Boulevard at Sherman (this location was sold by the corporation in 1981). In 1944, the business partnership of Olinger, Bona & Van Derbur was formed between the Olingers and Joseph E. Bona (1887-1978), his wife, and Francis S. Van Derbur (1907-1984). By then, the families of Olinger and Van Derber were joined by the marriage of daughter Gwendolyn Olinger (1908-1996) to Francis S. Van Derbur. Their youngest daughter, Marilyn Van Derbur Atler, would win the Miss America title in 1958, and is currently a prominent speaker on the subject of child abuse. Expansion of the business partnership continued with the building of another Olinger Mortuary on East Colfax at Magnolia to service the Park Hill area in 1951. The 1950's also saw the former Joss Mortuary, 2775 South Broadway, convert to Olingers in 1953. The concern of Olinger Mortuaries, Inc, was formed in 1959 with Francis Van Derber as President. Growth of the business was particularly strong during the 1960's, when Olinger Mortuaries, Inc. expanded into cemetery ownership, including the acquisition of Eastlawn Cemetery in 1963, the building of Evergreen Cemetery and the Mount Lindo Cemetery and Mausoleum the same year, and the purchase of the world's largest mausoleum with crematory, the Tower of Memories (built in 1926) in Crown. Hill Memorial Park, Wheat Ridge. Mt. Lindo Cemetery, located twenty minutes west of Denver, is the location of one of the area's most identifiable landmarks, the largest electrically-lighted cross in the world, which is illuminated nightly. With the death of George W. Sr. occurring in 1954, and the death of Margaret Olinger in 1968, their residence at 7495 West 29 ° Avenue, directly across Wadsworth Boulevard from Crown Hill Memorial Park, was converted to another Olinger Mortuary in 1970. Modifications to the home include the addition of the "Wadsworth Chapel" to facilitate services. With the 1980's came further change and growth to the Olinger enterprise, including the purchase of the Chapel Hills Cemetery in 1985, the Highlands Cemetery and Mortuary in 1986, and the Noonan-Bettman Mortuary in 1987. It should be noted that all property holdings of Olinger Mortuaries, Inc., were sold to Morlan International, Inc. in 1987, and changed hands again in 1987 when they were sold to S.C. I. of Houston, Texas, the current owner of record. The growth and development of the Olinger legacy was due to five generations of a single Denver family and their business associates. Their contribution to the Denver economic climate, as well as Colorado history, was more than profound. This is illustrated by the fact that one of the most notable of Olinger funeral services was that of Colonel William R Cody ('Buffalo Bill"), who died in Denver on January 10, 1917. His body was placed in a receiving vault at Olingers 16`s and Boulder Streets facility until the service on June 3, 1917 and was buried on Lookout Mountain in Golden. The gravesite is considered one of the most revered landmarks in the state of Colorado. To all Denver area residents, the numerous Olinger facilities sprinkled throughout the region have remained a familiar and tasteful mainstay to the community, and a reminder of our rich cultural and economic heritage.' Description of Olinger Residence, 7495 West 29t' Avenue: The former residence of Margaret and George W. Olinger, Sr. is an estate (ca 1925) occupying the northeast corner of West 29th Avenue and Wadsworth Boulevard. Original elements of the property consist of the main residence, surrounding gardens, a stucco pergola colonnade roughly 200 - 300 feet long running parallel to Wadsworth Boulevard, well house, sunken garden, caretaker's home, and original barn. Remnants of the formal grounds are still in evidence all across the property. The main structure, (architect to be verified), sits deep on the lot facing south and is surrounded by many mature cottonwood trees. The home's original main entrance is accessed from 29th Avenue by a double walkway flanked curbside by terra cotta-clad lanterns with lions-head details. Large terra cotta vessels flank the steps to the entrance, which boast globe-topped torcheres. A port-cochere is located on the west side of the building, with French doors leading directly into the home's Drawing Room. The original structure demonstrates intricate exterior brick patterning and eaveswork (see detail photograph), topped by a Spanish tile roof, an unusual and opulent treatment for the area. The sightline from 29th Avenue denotes the structures' stately though restrained single-storied Prairie-style roofline, though a second story is in evidence at the rear of the house over the automobile compartments. The pergola delineates the western edge of the property and consists of a double row of stucco pillars, which are each at least 2 feet in diameter, connected overhead by a grape arbor (see detail photograph). Mature rose bushes grow at the base of each pillar. An original concrete pathway leads down the center of the colonnade north, toward the caretaker's house, past an original pump house constructed in the same style as the main structure. Remnants of the formal gardens, such as concrete garden steps, are evident all along the pergola. Original hooks which one held strings of oriental lanterns during summer parties hosted by the Olinger family in the 1920s, 1930s, and 1940s are still intact. The main building on this site was converted to an operating mortuary in 1970, and a large chapel was added to facilitate funeral services. Other modifications to the site and structure include the paving of a large portion of the rear gardens, extending almost to the caretaker's home (see detail photograph). This paving was done, however, with high regard to the large cottonwood trees in the area, most of which were spared removal. At this time the exterior glazed brick of the main residence was painted white. Among the most memorable elements on the property was the presence of three large-scale replications of statuary from antiquity (the Discus Thrower and Venus De Milo being the most recognizable), which were present until just recently, when their deteriorating condition mandated their removal. The main house, pergola, and surrounding gardens are already highly regarded by many long-time Denver residents as landmarks due to their sheer architectural majesty. The fact that the area was once primarily farmland dictates that most structures from that era are farmhouses or outbuildings leaning toward a purely functional and somewhat rural architectural nature. This fact alone sets the Olinger residence apart from any other historic estate in West Denver, whether extant or not, for it was built in a grand modified- Prairie style and was embellished with gracious components associated almost exclusively with the well-heeled Denver establishment of the early part of the 200' century. True, estates such are this (the Bonfils Belmar, etc.) once dotted the farmland of the Front Range, however, this may be the one remaining country estate from early Denver on the West Side. It is incontrovertible that it should be revered as a symbol of early Denver society that is utterly irreplaceable. As of this date the surrounding area, though mostly residential, has succumbed to rapid commercial redevelopment (not all successful), and this particular property, with its elegant and graceful presence, adds rich historical value to Wheat Ridge. Simply put, it is a rare and beautiful architectural specimen in fundamentally pristine condition, further enhanced by the luxury of open space.2 1. Factual data courtesy of Donald M. Chase, Colorado Funeral Director's Association ("History of Colorado Funeral Enterprises by City or Town") 2. Architectural description researched and written solely by Kevin F. Murphy Meredith Reckert From: Alan White Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 5:57 PM To: Randy Young Cc: Meredith Reckert Subject: Olingers Randy, I just spoke with Jerry Dahl about Olingers. His opinion is that the landmark designation process is quasi-judicial. Council members should refrain from responding to Mr. Murphy's email or calling Ms. Worth. Mr. Murphy should be told that he needs to save that stuff for the hearing and should not contact Council. Because the landmark designation is quasi-judicial, it is not appropriate for Council to have a work session with the Olingers applicant to get a read on their leanings on the landmark designation. Their read can con at the hearing to consider the designation. They can then proceed with their rezoning application. On a related matter, the developer is offering to sell the mansion (the most historic part of the mortuary in my opinion) to the City! Any thoughts about this? A home for WR2020? Alan White Community Development Director 303-235-2844 Meredith Reckert From: Kevin Murphy [KMurphy@getty.edu] Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 12:42 PM To: Chris.Geddes@chs.state.co.us; kevinmurphy@sbcglobal.net Cc: Dale.Heckendorn@chs.state.co.us; Jeff Hirt; Meredith Reckert; jerryditullio@comcast.net Subject: Re: Olinger Residence Hello Ms. Geddes, Thank you very much for your e-mail. I'm glad the package arrived safely. As I said in my letter, your guidelines were very helpful and I did try to go line by line to include everything you were looking for (it seemed the emphasis was on the significance of the Olinger family, which is covered in my statement and the accompanying articles). The two biggest gray areas seemed to be the actual date of construction of the main house and the architect. I have since received information from the Wheat Ridge Historical Society that I was unable to locate about the construction date (it looks like 1914 is the elusive date) and a couple of possible architects. I can forward this to. you or revise the application, whichever would be easier. I understand the parameters of the historic designation, and my effort here is to merely lay the groundwork for the preservation effort and to heighten awareness among area residents, elected officials, and historic agencies before anything drastic occurs. I am most pleased to hear that you will be attending the meeting with the new owners, as it is voices such as yours that lend credence and authority to such important issues. I have spoken with Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner of the City of Wheat Ridge, and she understands that local sentiment leans toward a creative development incorporating the main historic elements into the new commercial plan (as it would be unrealistic to ask for much more), thus avoiding total demolition. Thank you again for your interest in the property, and as I said, I am coming across more information all the time and am more than willing to further develop the application as needed. Best of luck at the meeting! Sincerely, Kevin Murphy <Chris.Geddes@chs.state.co.us> 11/07/05 9:34 AM Mr. Murphy- I received your packet of information last Monday and, after sorting through everything, find I am still missing a number of pieces of information. Without going into too much detail, some of the information I requested in my letter was not provided. There is also some conflicting information related to dates of construction and changes to the property. Before anyone goes through the trouble of trying to accumulate this information, I would like to wait and see what transpires at a meeting I have been invited to attend with the owner, the city and Historic Denver. There is no point in doing all this research if the owner is already decided that the building will come down. I am not sure if you have had time to look through the packet that accompanied the preliminary evalution form, but there is information about the programs we administer, and it notes that the National and State Registers are really just recognition programs only. They do not offer protection from demolition or alterations. As I explained in my letter to you, without owner consent, the nomination cannot go forward. I will be in touch after the meeting with the owner and let you know where things stand, but.our position is that this is really between the City of Wheat Ridge and the owner. We at the Colorado Historical Society do not have the power or the authority to make an owner 1 preserve their property. The city really needs to make it clear to the owner if they feel strongly about the property being saved and then work with the owner to come up with a plan that will make everyone happy. We do appreciate your interest in trying to preserve this property. Should you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me; otherwise, I'll give you a call once I have a better idea of what is going on with the plans for the Olinger Residence. Chris Geddes National & State Register Historian Colorado Historical Society 225 E. 16th Ave., #950 Denver, Colorado 80203 - (303) 866-4683 chris.geddes@chs.state.co.us www.coloradohistory-oahp.org <www.coloradohistory-oahp.org> 2 WHEAJ , u m Community Development Department City of Wheat Ridge MORMON iUbstt M Date determined "eligible" 7500 W. 29th Avenue Ordinance # OtORp O Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 C ~ Date Recorded LOCAL HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION NOMINATION FORM Please type/print and complete all entries. Date: / f - o J - 0 t ~ 1 ✓ .7 t I CL E Address: 9 6 CJ ( ti 1 ~ U G Legal. Description: Tokow")Mig, `J t3. IS aML) cpp Ude-.s* N zl~,,l-; C5- 'ac.)1 ~ Ily n~ SQL 1 / ~ Property Name (Historic and/or common): l ')to kkAe 11:E 'P APOKXGANTT- XIO)T Name/Title. ~.rn a t~s ch~fFP_ ~'a j~ Address: $t~ ~ tx~`rtK p1 K.~N fife n l-,n v wn Phone: `I C~a ' Relationship to Owner: f ► Signature of Applicant:. d'• ` , 15- Subscribed and sworn to to his dFa~gf ern l z t , 20 ! / N~• puwc, ,PpO ota6Public D( M i i i O s y comm ss on exp res F 00 OS ER XN QR YIA? XO S. My Ce n [ssion Exoir Name: L W 0A a;c L~ SiVt C,csa L~P41161200 hone: =3 O 3 - a Z ( - 1 0c )o Address: ZOO > <U. Lx. S } f-~~ Z o J 1~e r r2 v' Up 0 Z30 Owner Does ❑ Does not I consent to designation. Signature of Owner Date CL$SIE~CA`PI01V Cate or : Ownership: Status: Present Use: Building ❑ Public Occupied El Commercial El Entertainment Structure fil-Private ❑ Unoccupied ❑ Educational ❑ Govern ent EK ,~y~ Z~Site - ❑ Religious ,COther: tltnv t V W ❑ Object ❑ Residential C~ Existing Designation: ❑ National Register ❑ State Register $I~MIFICAI,V Arc tectural: epresents notable work of master builder, designer or architect bodies distinguishing characteristics of an architectural type, period, style or method of construction Rmbodies distinguishing characteristics of indigenous materials or craftsmanship Historical: dentified with historic persons Identified with important events in national, state or local history Other: Exemplifies or reflects cultural, economic or social history of the nation Recommend as historic landmark by Wheat Ridge Historical Society s re Further Com (Add a separate sheet of paper if needed.) T~'Z~`z'O~CAX,-~N~'OItM'TXO~1 Please attach a narrative of the historical significance of the property. Include a title search if the property is important for its association with a significant person. Further Construction Building Mato Architectural Special Featu (Add a separate sheet of paper if needed. Please include photos of each elevation of the structure.) Describe any additions to the lzrrc ~[sL oiz. soua~cs`o IN~?(}~? Il~N Rev. 11/03/05 Attach photographs and other documentation which supports historic landmark designation. OAHP1403 determination Rev. 12/97 Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Historic Architectural Survey Form Official eligibility (OAHP use only) Date Initials DetermineTT1g1ble - MR Determined Not Eligible-NR Determined Eligible - SR Determined Not Eligible-SR Need Data Contributes to eligible NR District Noncontributing to eligible NR District 1. State site number: 5JF.1392 2. Temporaray state number: 3. County: Jefferson 4. City: Wheat Ridge 5. Historic building name: George Olinger house 6. Current building name: Olinger Mortuary 7. Building address: 7595 W. 29th Av., Wheat Ridge, CO 80215 8. Owner name and address: Colorado Mortuaries, Inc., P.O. Box, Houston Tx Geographic information 9. P.M. 6th Township 3 South Range 69 West SW 1/4 of SW 1/4 of NW 1/4 of SE 1/4 of section 26 10. UTM reference Zone 13 Easting 493120 Northing 4400790 11. USGS quad name: Arvada, Colo. Year: 1965 PR 1980 Map scale R 7.5' 15' Attach photo copy of approriate map section. 12. Lot (s): West 1/2 lot 3 Block: 1 Addition: Barth Subdivsion Year of Addition: 1882 13. Boundary Description and justification: 69-03-26-064800-01-03 This structure is located on the above described lot. Architectural Description 14. Building plan (footprint, shape): rectangular 15. Dimensions in feet: Length x Width 16. Number of stories: 2 17. Primary external wall material(s) (enter no more than two): Brick 18 Roof configuration (enter no more than one): Hipped 19. Primary external roof material (enter no more than one): Tile OAHP1403, page 2 Site number: 5JF.1392 20. Special features (enter all that apply(: This structure consists of two major components. The portion on the west is the George Olinger house, built in 1914 as a single dwelling and converted in the 1970s into a mortuary. The portion on the east was constructed in the 1970s as a mortuary and was designed to match the architectural features of the Olinger house. There is a covered portico in front of the east building for funeral car loading. The west building is built elevated above street level and has a stairway leading down to W. 29th Ave. The south wall of the house has numerous windows on either side of the center front entry door. 21. General architectural description: The two buildings are conjoined to form a single unit but with very different details and methods of con- struction. The west building, a former single dwelling, has numerous windows and entry doors on the south and east walls. There is a garage built into the lower level of the west wall at the north end of the building. Grade changes allow a formal front entry on the south side of the building and a rear entry on the north side of the building. The entire west building is constructed using bricks painted white. The east building is taller and features four large windows on both the east and west walls. It does use similar white painted bricks but over a steel beam construction method. A drive through portico is adjacent to the south wall of the east building. 22. Architectural style/building type: Commercial 23. Landscaping or special setting features: There is an extensivelawn in the south (front) and west (side) yards. There is a large asphalt paved parking area in the north yard and an asphalt paved driveway in the east (side) yard extending from 29th Ave. to the parking lot. The lot features numerous mature trees throughout the grounds including parking areas. Included are nine large oak trees lined parallel to 29th Ave. and to Wadsworth Blvd. There is a pergola on the west property line adjacent to Wadsworth Blvd. There is statuary in the Classical Greek tradition in the front yard. There is a concrete sidewalk, curb and gutter on Wadsworth but the lawn extends to the aspalt of W. 29th Ave. in the front yard. 24. Associated buildings, features, or objects: There is the caretakers' dwelling located at the northwest corner of the lot with a street address of 2960 Wadsworth Blvd. This structure is a one and one-half story wood. siding dwelling with front gable roof. Due to regrading of Wadsworth Blvd. in about 1959 this house now sits below Wadsworth. Associated with the structure is a garage or storage building at W. 30th Av. and Webster St. Jefferson County assessor lists caretakers' dwelling as constructed in 1892. Parcels within Barth Subdivision were known to have been rented prior to their first recorded sales, so this date appears reasonable. OAHP, page 3 Site number: 5JF.1392 The pergola was an integral feature of the landscaping of the Olinger residence when it was constructed in 1914. Vines and other plants covered the 300 foot long pergola for many years providing a shady walkway for both residents and pedestrians alike. Originally the Rocky Mountain Ditch lateral was located on the east side of Wadsworth near the structure... Since the 1970s there has been no vines but the structure remains and some restoration work has been done. - Architectural History - 25. Date of Construction: Estimate Actual 1914 Source of information: Jefferson county assessors records. Wheat Ridge News (published 1914-1916, copies at Wheat Ridge Historic Park) 26. Architect: - Unknown - Source of information Not available 27. Builder/Contractor: Unknown Source of information: Not available 28. Original owner: George Olinger Source of information: Jefferson County assessors index; Newspaper articles 29. Construction history (include description and dates of major additions, alterations or demolitions): The west part of the building was constructed in 1914 and was the home of George W. and Margaret Olinger. The house included living quarters and formal entertainment facilities. In the 1920 property tax assessment roll, the Olinger house is one of the most valuable in Wheat Ridge. There may have been an addition at the north end of the building while it was a residence or it may have been added during construction of the adjacent mortuary. The mortuary was constructed in 1970 at which time the residential quarters were assimilated into the mortuary operation. 30. R Original location Moved Date of move(s) Historical Associations 31. Original use(s): single dwelling (suburban estate) 32. Intermediate use(s) : 33. Current use(s): Commercial (mortuary) 34. Site type(s): Neighborhood commercial site OAHP1403, page 4 Site number: 5JF.1392 35. Historical background: This site was originally part of the Asahel Beach 160 acre pre-emption which was purchased by Moritz and William Barth in 1872 and was platted as Barth Subdivision in 1882. Simon Brown is the first identified purchaser of the ten acres described as Lot 3 Block 1. Parcels within Barth subdivision were rented prior to purchase, but indi- vidual renters of particular parcels have not been identified. George W. Olinger purchased the West half of lot 3 on March 1,-1911. The house was built in 1914. At the time Olinger was manager of his family's mortuary at 16th and Boulder Streets. This house is one of four Olinger-owned parcels along West 29th Ave.: the mortuary (1908), Olinger Gardens subdivision - (1919), the house (1914) and Crown Hill Cemetery (1907). Olinger also developed Welshire, Bonne Brae and Indian Hills subdivisions. 36. Sources of information: Jefferson county assessors index; -'Olinger' family newspaper clipping file at Wheat Ridge Historic Park library; Thomas Noel, Denver: Rocky Mountain Gold, p. 223. Samuel Johnson, Auto- biography. Significance: 37. Local landmark designation: yes R no Date of designation: Designating authority: 38. Applicable National Register Criteria: A. Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad pattern of our history. R B. Associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. R C. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or _ D. Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in history or prehistory. Qualifies under Criteria Consideration A through G (see Manual) Does not meet any of the above National Register criteria 39. Area(s) of significance: Significant person, 40. Period of significance: 1914-1940 41. Level of significance: Local (Wheat Ridge) and metropolitan (Denver) 42. Statement of significance: George W. Olinger made several significant contributions to the development of Wheat Ridge including his initial investment in Crown Hill Cemetery in 1907 and his development of Olinger Gardens at 29th and Sheridan in 1919. Later, following his death, the Olinger mortuary expanded its operations to this site. Olinger developed the Denver-area's largest mortuary business. His house was built to re- flect his rising status in the Denver community. Both the construction methods and the landscaping features make this house stand out among Wheat Ridge residential structures. OAHP1403, page 5 Site number: 5JF.1392 43. Assessment of historic physical integrity related to significance: Despite conversion from a residence to a commercial use the west building constructed in 1914 retains its original exterior features. The newer east building uses architectural elements such as roofline and use of windows to establish a uniform appearance to the site. Continued maintenance of the landscaping and pergola contribute to the site's significance. National Register Eligibility Assessment 44. National Register eligibility field assessment: R Eligible Not Eligible Need D 45. Is there National Register district potential? yes x no Discuss: Most of the older structures associated with Crown Hill Cemetery are no longer standing such as the offices, maintenance facilities and green house. The National Register Tower of Memories is one-half miles west of the Olinger house and mortuary. Due to architectural style and adjacent land use differences with nearby residential structures, this structure would not contribute to a National Register district. 46. If there is National Register district potential, is this building Contributing Noncontributing Recording Information 47. Photograph numbers: Negative filed at: Wheat Ridge Historic Park, 4610 Robb St., Wheat Ridge 48. Report title: Wheat Ridge Historic Structure Survey 1998-1999 49. Date(s): February 24, 1998 50. Recorder(s): Robert J. Olson 51. Organization: Wheat Ridge Historical Society 52. Address: P.O. Box 1833, Wheat Ridge, CO 80034-1833 53. Phone number(s): 303-421-9111 (office) or 303-433-6097 (home) Colorado Historical Society, Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation 1300 Broadway, Denver, CO 80203, (303) 866-3395 4 td.t~ oJo, V,-t (c~ Olinger Mansion 7495 West 29`h Avenue Wheat Ridge Colorado A structure may be eligible for National/State Register designation if it is over 50 years old and meets one of the following criteria: Is this structure architecturally significant. 1. This house is certainly larger and more impressive than surrounding residential structures. 2. The architects or contractors have not been identified. 3. The residential portion (west) was built in 1914 4. There was an earlier residential structure now located at the north end of lot. 5. There was an arbor built along Wadsworth which still stands. 6. There was a landscaping element south and southwest of the front entry. Is this structure associated with persons (or institutions) which made significant contributions to the community. George Washington Olinger (1882-1954) 1. George Olinger was owner or manager of Olinger Mortuaries, 1901 to 1940's which was located at 15th and Platte (1890-1909) or 1600 Boulder St. (1909-1999). 2. He was a principal in Associated Industries, which developed Bonnie Brae (Denver), Olinger Gardens (Wheat Ridge) and Indian Hills (Jefferson County) 3. He was a principal in Crown Hill Cemetery (1907) and other memorial parks. 4. He was a principal in building Tower of Memories (a National Landmark) 5. He was founder of Highland Boys youth organization 1916 until I940's. 6. He provided the first mass transit in Wheat Ridge (circa 1910's). 7. He was a founding member and officer of Colorado Funeral Directors Assoc. 8. He was a founding member and officer of American Funeral Directors Assoc. 9. He provided quality, affordable housing for his employees in 1919 at Olinger Gardens Subdivision. 10. He supported the fine arts through the Olinger Quartet, the Olinger organists and other musical groups. 11. He was an early advocate of "planned needs" in the funeral business, providing a financial model for individuals to plan their own funeral/death activities. 12. He was an early advocate of the "memorial park" which was aesthetically pleasing and carefully designed to replace "burial grounds" Frances Vanderber 1. Frances Vanderber was a principal in Olinger Mortuaries, Crown Hill Cemetery, Tower of Memories. 2. Vanderber was son-in-law of George W. Olinger, and carried out many of his business and philanthropic endeavors. Olinger Mortuaries 1. Olinger Mortuaries was founded by John and Emma Olinger in 1890 at 15`h and Platte Sts. They later constructed a modern mortuary at 1600 Boulder St. (1909-1999). 2. In 1969, an addition was constructed east of the Olinger family home and the entire complex became a full service mortuary. 3. By 1986 Service Corporation International purchased Olinger Mortuaries, Crown Hill Cemetery and other assets. 4. Jefferson County Open Space purchased portions of Crown Hill for open space and park purposes. 5. Olinger Gardens was a large employer of Wheat Ridge and Denver area workers (see Olinger Gardens Subdivision). Associated Industries 1. Served as a real estate development and financial arm of the Olinger business enterprises, planning, constructing and developing Bonnie Brae (Denver), Olinger Gardens (Wheat Ridge), and Indian Hills (Jefferson County) 2. Involved in numerous other business activites. Crown Hill Cemetery 1. In about 1907 George Olinger arranged to purchase about 150 acres of land from Henry Lee (later expanded to about 230 acres). In about 1908 burials began in Crown Hill Cemetery, both from Olinger and other mortuaries. 2. Crown Hill featured the landscaped architecture associated with memorial gardens rather than "burial ground" design used in earlier cemeteries. 3. Crown Hill featured "perpetual maintenance" and acquired water rights on the Rocky Mountain Ditch and water storage rights in Crown Hill Lake. 4. Crown Hill Cemetery was a large employer of Wheat Ridge area workers. Olinger Gardens Subdivision 1. Is located between Sheridan and Fenton Streets and 29th and 32"d Avenues. It was purchased by Olinger business interests from Moses Hallett estate (which acquired it from James W. Richards family). 2. It provided quality, affordable housing for the workers in various Olinger family businesses and others. Mass Transit I . Olinger family businesses constructed and operated a street car line from 29th and Yates past Wadsworth into Crown Hill Cemetery sometime around 1910. 2. This line provided funeral cars, employee transportation, and general public transportation connecting with Denver Transit Company lines inside Denver. 3. Continued to operate a shuttle bus after the street car lines were taken out. Service Corporation International 1. Many Olinger family business enterprises were acquired during the 1980's. 2. This company plays a pivotal role in consolidation of the mortuary and cemetery business enterprises in North America. 3. The consolidation may now be affecting these potentially historical structures. y. r n ~ r r C: .f• .n L 17 , G all ' n r~ ~4M. ^t] OQ fD to " ~ 44- SD ~ . 1 : ~ !l n to Pa CD _ 1 ,.loul'n,ll of tllf• Inunissioncrs•of ~ ~ .1c(Tersbn county, Colon1do, AUODS'I 19 . Cnuttyeiuu,r Jack Ire is ^Aio - Conmu::siun,r t e ❑ l wis 'A , Comm insions uv .t ri l.. Bo,iki""a 'A} ~'x!g h WHEREAS, the Plannim7 Lnltnecr fins pros,nt,d Hise nin No. 27, J,q fers.on C~::n ty at rJ -.n th-- y)'Y Nli'., 1.44, 1000, as pfcl,arod by the Planning Dcpar it:cat, and - i MIEREAS, Cho Board of Countv Commisnion„1'. Of the Count/ • - n, - t Jeffurson. Co l; ratio, nt sa id ap NOW, '1llERCPORE, BE IT RESOLVCD, that Base Map No. 27, Jefferson Countv coreeving :!v . N1 y, R70W, bo and hereby is approvoJ and adopted as the O:fic.i ! Baso Map of Jo -orson Co•wt., ,and the Chairman is hereby and herewith authorized to ar_ii his signature thereon. REZONING AND RECLASSIFICATION - - t~ CASE N0. B69-56 _ Francis5. Van Jerbur V Commissioner Trezise resolved that the following resolution be adopted, secanded by Comrissiono, Lewis and carried by unanimous 'vote. The roll having been called, the vote was as follr.ws: s i Commissioner Jack L. Trezise "Ave"; Commissioner Joe B. Lewis ".lye Commissioner Chester L. HOskinson "Aye"; WHEREAS, FRANCIS S. VAN DERBBR has filed an application to rezone the hereinafter described ~property in Jefferson County, Colorado, to amend the Jefferson County Zon_og N%= No. 4, from Residential Two (R-2) Zone District to Restricted Commercial One (R-Cl) Zme District; and WHEREAS, after notice as provided by law, a Public Hearing was held by this Board of County • Conm,issioners on July 22, 1969, and at the conclusion thereof was. taken urcer adr_semcnr, by proper resolution, for further consideration and for a decision to August 3, 1969; and - r WHEREAS, based on the evidence, testimony and exhibits, a study of the Comcrehens :•e Plan and . the recommendation -of the Planning Commies ion and the comments of the Director 0' the P-anning Department, this Board FINDS as follows: - 1. The Comprehensive Land Vse Plan recommends residential developmeno for t-is ar-a and,the proposed rezoning conflicts with that plan. -However, the An _icant `erein, in Case No. B67-89,'. had previously applied for rezoning within the 5,e catevorv an4 for the same use and purpose, but such previous application was withdrawn, ~_luntarcly, k until the Comprehensive Plan could be updated. Tnat new ComprehePsive Plan ' - process of being prepared and is not comoleted as of this date. This -card 's o_ - opinion that as a result of the character of the area being changed a_-.n beca_se sin. t[~~ general area is in a state of transition, as a result of many factors, the rroposef ~'!g rezoning sought herein will be in general agree.-lent -'th such undated Comore 'ecsir_ /Za3 - Plan. Among those transitional factors is the large increase o- traf` c a1c a ad_- ws7a worth Boulevard, upon which Boulevard the oroposed rezonina abuts. P_ i'io 2 i and within recent years, although some of the preipert: existing on Wa_ wort noule --arc is residentially zoned, only a few building permits have been issued or he pvrnose of residential construction. For many miles on Wadsworth Boulevard only £o. builc_ny- permits have been issued for the present zoning as new existing in th s case and t-e pF§@ retention of such zoning amounts to an unreasonable economic use of a procerty. - y 2. Additionally, the proposed use of the property conforms to other tees of oron along Wadsworth Boulevard which have recen lv been dewaloped, and the propos-d vse --herein will result-in unified development when consicered from a Iota--- st_^cpoi, . ' Further, a similar use has recently been approved by this Board in th- ianmec ate a3=a. The immediate area is,, therefore, in a state o transition su .icient -o gra t tie rezoning sought herein and such rezoning is in the best interests of :.e hearth, safety - and welfare ofthe 'citizens of the County of Jefferson.- , NOW, TBEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that rezoning application case No. B69-56 to amend the Ja _fersoa County Zoning Map No. 4 to include within the Restricted Commercial one (P,-Cl) Zc-s Dis =-ict an< to exclude from the Residential Two (R-2) Zone District the following. described i-:rnco: orated area of Jefferson County be and hereby is approved: ,✓~~t - West It of Lot 3, Block 1, Barth's Subdivision. - LOCATION: NE Corner of West 29th Avenue and Wadsworth Boulevard. CASE NO. B69-75 - Peter V. S Rose Capra Commissioner Lewis resolved that the following resolution be adopted, secoc:ed by Conmi==inner P Trezise and carried by unanimous vote. The roll having been called, the vote was s-as fo Lows: _ - Commissioner Joe B. Lewis -"Aye Commissioner Jack L. Trezise .,Aye..; Commissioner Chester L. Hoskinson "Aye": w-HEREAS, Peter, V. and Rose Capra have filed an application to rezone the property locatci at t Northwest corner intersection Robb Street and North 1-70 Service Road, Jefferson County, Colora- do, to amend the Jefferson County Zoning Nap No. 13 and 14, from Agricultural-One (A-1) District to Industrial Three (I-3) District, and ! i WHEREAS, after'notice as provided by law, and in accordance with C.R.S. 1963, 106-2-15, a publi, hearing was held by this Board of county commissioners on July 22, 1969, and at the concha:ion thereof was taken under advisement, by proper resolution, for further cons`deratio.n and :;or a- decisiom to August 5, 1969, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners desire additional time for further cons idcrpraon and for a decision, INOW, TIII-RECORF', DD IT RI'SOLVDD, that rp oning application case ao E n 75 Peter v. antl Rosc Capra to a,nend the. Jc,a„ "niT nnunt/ Zonijir; Map o 1 ap 9.l to mel w thin i' Lud~.'tiial- Three (I-3) Zone DIStrict, and ex,l dt from the A ncul ,ra One 1~ u-n Distr--t l.• anJ 1 Fe v u 1 5 I , r .fit i!,';. a i..... t 7`. r I ' s - II I ` 1 I y r ~ t , } j _ - ~ / ! 1 Do i n Qs' y F: i. r ~ J' 1 f 4Y% 1 1 VAR r a , i ~ c Kl 1 ~ ~ 111 - - - ~ :C ~ y; - r to 1 r 1 . t t ~Y f a 1 r. • i7 - , 1Y "it i 1 t a, f I u W HE COURT IN AHO °OR THE II' COUNTY C. 'RSON, STA"P C'r :,OLURA CO - i ENTRY OF 1UdGMENT I ~ 3 a THE SO. c QE COC _ LSI~ [ I . he eme ad i :.r d r„ <.a.< n, ned I ' . . . P.rse Towell H " h • y - n. ~ o pla ntx s Ceo e F :^.aC lx'c Z- Ftn r , ta^iar, o~exl ,.o Jean "trro G ea, T Kreutzer and L e T. i blon t _ r-r-on_ =-i.sated..under. bale 23 r. the CcL > 7 o_ Civil Proceuure, !-.i Colorado. of i f" erxnax:.x re= -,n. P.-7 nn r', -;t xon to the I_ . area. Ten lay o e ion gt t (i: err x,r < oA or. 1 ;e . LI; L _ rs'f 0, au,c pr<; rune April , - d i . . 2n . 1970. 1RFf K. 17kIi i I PP.'.Of THE !Sl ht(T COURT ~ i 1 n . .rk II IL i :9 i ~I o;~r c Or _ T-~ CONCLUSIONS r A":D ORD-RS TFE 133ARD OF L,=: OF THE COU::~-y -F E 07 C(A~ORACO' C' a rv .1.5 nc,a on for trial this 31st day. of ein^ rer csuntM by Ceorae C. Aucoin. 1970. . ,_,a.-: ~_o."ts Corr."icners z'rd a.ern ey at iaw, " by e ril t _.iss. --ounty A;.torrey, Robert Jac <s n- r`r ' F:c.e i^.'t by Maurice' _ and. the oeer9ar•_ C, -.,r core:der- . r'. • cO F~x a^d Henry ..t . . - a•. low, _ _ ace-.^^`° c_f r _.Ah order. adjudge ica t`re er r!er.ce a - . - and decree as .011 ew°: - d - ` this action in decl.ratory judgment . The sonl . - ,in real property local. ed at the inter- - involvEs the rezo ir';i of Nest h _•^,ic i and Wa25'orth 9o..i ...rd n Jefferson - k i on sect t t County. Cie{ of W 11"t F:... nh;,.. .a__ i,eer {0-, t. Cc r• 1. formerly altu.i a CI in y r i'stot rq the J.•CTrrsnr f tar r cr. r.F.°i'.i is di'l i.. `.act hav.'• h. ^a... :L Was located _ I " t + J fy _ a. - iu r_?dic C:on a'r r-•.ccss 'c. ..s a ia. _ o•I cr acou` i• . Fvocst i. 14E9, dly _ '-ror~ F°r7 den'ial • ! I i for on rr . v annrcx na _ c n F •_o the .:ca~i^. ac.. olb.cr c :^i n. y o[ Fur".Pr. .I':!• tl1e JC"t jl1-'P.1,.. 'n'd5 k . . zoned Resl¢'n`_lal 2 (P-21 r. nsity r,rident.al 1Re • cn or about 194,:rsva^_ c. :-.e rival zotir;_1 plcn for ;;n:ferson County' s i - h ' cr 1)C.1 `he e fe. don C' ,:nlV _ _ a e: T . - a -a.-er Plan for the nr c 1•: my a r' and that this ?`aster plan -e,il. ._a. v 2 (R-. icy r e r rrt_:. Fart rr. Tc`c C..-: _ nt. i:,. ezi t.o e. u.T. nn, upda--e :1a1t1r Plan, a=._ th,s `11 tL ^':rster _ fur -i er called far R!`s'.eo',_al f1 for t'a area. - - Tbr c. '.a :led= a,. _ 7'-ent. t. "r1; t 7cr i!% c`.arge a I ~o f building rr+ir ~e:• .ri r:::1' .as ..,.i:-1y acted . j Peon by the la curs i made 3. party to t"Ii.. own=rs. i The ,..`r plai-.ti:.s a c r_i•(r-.,hoYS and : - ^ . iiid s c. _i1eCe tf ',.ae, . v c . o.. • abutting proper 3'4 C~,...~wrxma. .aa.av.a..w.,. o..o:,..u«we..umffi<~ ' <e:e. 501 Cu,--ry of Jetders-n, and h"._ a . the h<-:'rtot.. re announced resider Vial z-or"T i tr..,. e'ti^e neigh rnood, _ \ is whether or ._c... .i: + powers by the 9oan ct re7or.inq chance co reas>ral2e rela- o.=hit to ....e vl Q~ : orJc rl 'el--c_Y^.'. bt. the community. or _r case t>. r.,,• . .-i-e ina^: The -.es-_ion refers -cs^:u- r -ems by . . f2mun or io, about All''It h' Is 71 C u No. B,°_-.p re.. e.: •''r: i ,.j.:. I 'fats . - -r . i" + :fear ..ere has }„-~cr', . 1'n.: . . r, . . <i: - _ i. a la-or increase in tra is ..1 s~a a . L evi & that Act,- has b. .,r WY 3, few roliaent:al t. -1.111'-~ P'. . is.;"e8 along tiaos - ' worth Boulecard• and that cnrnere.. .o'.:ctn to the Lost - _ / t tSyS econorsic use of the Subject _ :r2_e -bJ. °.r s._ rms"s the Count)' a • Coma S.ssioners chana_e3 the z.: in.^ -'o r=... .._.ial _.,•.-wrc:.al. ' The court ` ~ t a ck r.cr- - _ in c'nfo e¢i t.}' with " - - - the evidence L.e°(" -eC to t4- ('(,.a`.4 r _ +rs and their aztio.i i t~'-I ( i was therefore arbitrary acd c ;uric+.c - rc th, hest it tea. sr=- of the comn:;nity. „a The court furtu r find- .:at t. -coif of County C : .i"icner~ w~ did not follo. tLe trio Tr ❑^__o. - Tr. y Planting C:mnr~. r.ion - and the advice of t:.,. . y _.a. . . 6m Latham to t keep this are teradan w: •..r r•a to them it t?iN rezoning hea-ing. _ t.: i•, and devalue the ,it°'(r r I- . =nil r,•10°r- w-.~.. - change the chat am-' q " .5 ,t iat t': a ~ .e. sauce K".F~Y1~,•^va a;a~• ~FFq!REnhN7. ..PTV, I 1 c plan I . a_ the rc_oninn , I an a, _ _ hr ty the Mali of C., 1. ? - ,fecru. Court c such Tenoning ~ _ he i i r r Pl :1d c-t be e :-.'tt . =ItoresL ,.l t'•r . an ...,-e . t finds and c :si r that tLe CKY _ 15 NW l nv zoning mz,ps and csis.:ng i_g e- < C,'.•., xitlw4L its crwn stu2y -nr plan fp.^' ,.'.::e. 'therefore, the . City a_c c= I aw :Uh l doe.! w d should hp re7 zcnieq o' P,-2. 1i:F. CO a' _ City ! Whoa` F idue take appro- priate a-_t.en w -W rezone %to suhject. prop- F-2. w ct 1 t•,P rt. Y1:diLS Vested la. In, ,..r _ a, Cim: ~.t }'.erc.tofore _........xii. a. . iacicmni. chief IK i ..-aurae Lhc sub)ect wrisdi -'in City of A'tteet Rid ge. r r..•pe _ .r.. . I'. e. lr ~ - i c. , of rr i.! r.unc pro tune April L 11!7 _ dVI St`y'x j KEviN F. MURPHY October 17, 2005 VIA FAX The Wheat Ridge Historic Society City Hall Wheat Ridge, CO Dear Sir or Madam, As you are probably well aware, the Wheat Ridge City Hall is located directly across 29th Avenue from one of Wheat Ridge's foremost historical edifices, the former residence of George and Margaret Olinger (obviously the buildings have been the site of an operating mortuary since 1970). As you probably also know, the property has been recently sold and the prospect of demolition of the remaining elements of the estate is very high. Many of the area residents feel, as I, that it is in the best historical and cultural interest of Wheat Ridge to have some if not all of the original buildings placed on the state historic registry to possibly avoid demolition. I have submitted to Ms. Chris Geddes of the Colorado Historical Society the Preliminary Evaluation Form for this effort, however, it is lacking a couple of key pieces of information I thought your office may be able to furnish. I need to know the date of construction of the main house (the "mansion") and the architect. Unfortunately I have not been able to come across these facts through normal research channels or inquiry, and was hoping you might have either or both in your files. Considering the very nature of the project, I would appreciate any feedback from your office concerning this critical issue, and would very much welcome your participation. The main house, pergola, and surrounding gardens are already highly regarded by many long-time Denver residents as landmarks due to their sheer architectural majesty, and it would be a travesty to Wheat Ridge, not to mention Denver as a whole, to lose them. I can be reached by phone at 310-440-7517, fax at 310-440-7752, at this e-mail, or at kevi n murphy0sbcglobal. net. Sincerely, Kevin Murphy /kin 3050 UPHAM COURT WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80033 COLORADO STATE REGISTER OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES The Colorado State Register of Historic Properties is a listing of the state's significant cultural resources worthy of preservation for the future education and enjoyment of Colorado's residents and visitors. Properties listed in the State Register include individual buildings, structures, objects, districts and historic and archaeological sites. The State Register program is administered by the Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation within the Colorado Historical Society. The Society maintains an official list of all properties included in the State Register. Properties that are listed in the National Register of Historic Places are automatically placed in the State Register. Properties may also be nominated separately to the State Register without inclusion in the National Register. Over 1,600 properties are listed in the State Register. These listings include buildings, sites, districts, objects, and districts. At least one properly in every Colorado county is included in the register. NOMINATION PROCESS Properties may be nominated to the State Register by the owner, a local government, an agency or the Society. However, all nominations must contain the owner's signed and notarized approval of the nomination. The nominator must submit sufficient information to the Society on the State Register nomination form along with any accompanying documentation necessary to establish the property's historical significance and eligibility for inclusion based on State Register criteria. When a completed nomination is received by the Society, the nomination form is reviewed for sufficiency within 14 days. Incomplete nominations are returned to the applicants for additional information. Complete nominations are scheduled for the next State Register Review Board meeting and the owners and nominators are notified as to the date, time and location of the review board meeting. The Colorado State Register Review Board is composed of citizen members and professionals from the disciplines of prehistoric and historic archaeology, history, architecture and architectural history. The Review Board meets at least three times a year to consider nominations. These meetings are open to the public. At the conclusion of the Review Board meeting, the Board recommends to the Colorado Historical Society Board of Directors the approval or denial of the nominated properties for inclusion in the State Register. Within thirty days of the recommendation, the Society Board of Directors determines whether the nominated properties are to be listed in the State Register. The property owners are notified of the determination. NOMINATION CRITERIA Criteria for consideration of properties for nomination and inclusion in the State Register includes the following: A. The association of the property with events that have made a significant contribution to history; B. The connection of the property with persons significant in history; C. The apparent distinctive characteristics of a type, period, method of construction, or artisan; D. The geographic importance of the property; E. The possibility of important discoveries related to prehistory or history. BENEFITS OF LISTING Listing in the Colorado State Register of Historic Properties provides: ✓ Formal recognition of a property's importance to the history of the community and the state of Colorado. ✓ A body of information for local community planning, tourist promotion, neighborhood revitalization. ✓ A sense of community history and local pride. ✓ Eligibility to compete for grants from the Colorado Historical Society's State Historical Fund. These grants may be used for acquisition and development, education, and survey and planning projects. ✓ Eligibility to apply for state tax credits for restoration, rehabilitation, or preservation of State Register properties. ✓ Limited protection from state agency actions that would affect the property. Agencies must solicit the comments of the Colorado Historical Society to assure that State Register properties are given consideration in the state planning process. THE STATE REGISTER AND PROPERTY OWNERS No property may be listed in the State Register without the consent of the property owner. There are no restrictions imposed by the Colorado Historical Society as to what private property owners may or may not do with their property. Private property owners may alter or demolish a listed property subject only to applicable local government regulations and permitting procedures. In some communities, properties listed in the State Register may be automatically designated as local landmarks. Such landmark status may include the local review of proposed changes to the property through the application of design guidelines. A list of Colorado communities with local landmarking programs is available from OAHP and is also posted on the office website at coloradohistory-oahp.org. If you have questions or wish to obtain Colorado State Register nomination materials, please contact the State Register Coordinator in the Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation at 303-866-4681. South Elevation _ Drawing by Merrill Ann Wilson Smith's Chapel, Denver State Register HOW TO COMPLETE THE PRELIMINARY PROPERTY EVALUATION FORM Please type or print and fill in the form as completely as possible. Complete information will allow us to evaluate the building's significance and eligibility for nomination to the National Register of Historic Places and the Colorado State Register of Historic Properties. Use additional sheet if you have more information than will fit on the inventory form. Front of Form County and city - County and municipality in which the building is located. Use nearest municipality for rural buildings. Historic name(s) - Original and subsequent names of the building, if known. Current building name and address - Current name of the building and the exact address with zip code. Owner name and address - Correct owner name and address is crucial for the inventory. Indicate the name and address of a private individual or a specific federal or state agency. Original owner - Name of original building owner. Use - Briefly note the building's historic use(s) and present use. Local landmark designation - Indicate whether the building is an official locally designated landmark. State the designating organization and the date the designation was made. Plan shape - Provide a sketch of the building exterior floor plan to show the basic shape of the building and associated outbuildings. Include an arrow indicating North. Township, range, section, and USGS topographic quad map name, date, and scale - Much of this information should be available at the local tax assessor or planning office as part of the property record files. Attach a photocopy portion of the United States Geographical Survey (USGS) topographical quad map to the form. Topo map sections can be accessed on the Web at several sites such as Terraserver-usa.com or Topozone.com. The building or its location should be circled. If a USGS map is not available then a planning or similar small scale map be substituted. Lot, block, addition and year of addition - This information can be obtained from the local tax assessors or planning office. Rural addresses rarely have such information. If there are no block or lot numbers, then the township, range, and section are crucial. Original site or moved - Indicate whether the building is on its original site or has been moved. Note the date of the move. Construction date - Determine the construction date with care. Inclusive dates can be given for buildings built over a period of years (e.g. 1899-1902). If an exact date is unknown, after and before dates can be used (e.g. after 1887 and before 1893). Provide the name of the source for the construction date (e.g. tax assessor office or building permit). Architect and builder/contractor - List the names of the architect and the builder or contractor of the building, if known. Give the information source. Indicate if information is unknown. External materials, stories, and dimensions - List the major exterior building materials, number of stories, and the overall dimensions of the building. Associated buildings - Indicate the existence of any outbuildings (e.g. privy, separate garage, or shed) Back of Form Architectural description - Briefly describe the major stylistic elements of the building. Be sure to mention such features as porches, window styles, ornamentation, chimneys, roof types and any other distinguishing features. Photographs - Provide photographs showing each side of the building and any associated buildings. Black and white photographs are preferred as color photographs fade over time, however color photographs are acceptable. Place the photographs in an envelope and attach to the back of the inventory form. Construction history - Briefly describe the original construction and major alterations, additions, and demolitions to the building listing relevant names, dates, and materials. Historical background - Briefly discuss the history of the building as it relates to important events and persons. Information sources - List the information sources and references used in the preparation of this form. List individuals interviewed, newspapers (with dates), and books consulted or the source of historic photographs and other materials used. This is especially important for the information contained in the construction history and historical background sections. Significance - Indicate the appropriate area(s) of significance for the building. Statement of significance - Explain the reasons why this building is significant to your community's history. For example, is it the only or best remaining example of a particular architectural style? Does the building possess high artistic value or is it the work of a master architect or builder? Is the building closely associated with a person who was important in your community's history. Is the building associated with important historic events? Preparer of form - Please provide the name, address and day-time phone number of the person who completed the evaluation form. Materials request - You may indicate here materials you wish to receive after the property has been reviewed for its eligibility for listing in the National and State Registers. If you have more information than will fit in any of the boxes, attach additional sheets as necessary. Return the completed evaluation form to: Colorado Historical Society National and State Register Programs 225 E. 161" Ave., Suite 950 Denver. CO 80203 Contact the Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation at the Colorado Historical Society if you have any questions. The phone number is 303-866-3392. Information and forms are also available on the Web at coloradohistory-oahp.org. Revised 8/2004 1419 PRELIMINARY PROPERTY EVALUATION FORM NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES COLORADO STATE REGISTER OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES COLORADO HISTORICAL SOCIETY 225 E. 18"' Ave., Suite 950 Denver, CO 80203 COUNTY: CITY: HISTORIC BUILDING NAME(S): CURRENT BUILDING NAME: BUILDING ADDRESS: OWNER NAME $ ADDRESS: ORIGINAL OWNER: Source of information: HISTORIC USE(S): PRESENT USE LOCAL LANDMARK DESIGNATION: [ ] yes [ ] no Date of designation: Designating authority: STATE SITE NUMBER: OFFICE USE ONLY BELOW Eligible for National Register yes no date initials Criteria A B C D Contributes to a potential National Register district yes _ No district name: Eligible for State Register _ yes no date initials Criteria A B C D E Areas of significance: Period of significance Needs data date initials Style: UTM REFERENCE: NAD27 NA083 Zone: Easting: Northing:_ Elevation: OFFICE USE ONLY ABOVE GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: P.M.: Township: Range: ''A of ''A of of ''A of Section: USGS quad name: Year: [ ] 7.5'[ ] 15' Lot(s): Block: Addition: Year of addition: [ ] original location [ ] moved Date of move(s): CONSTRUCTION DATE: estimate: actual: Source of information: PLAN SHAPE: north arrow ARCHITECT: BUILDERICONTRACTOR: Source of information: EXTERNAL MATERIALS: STORIES: BUILDING DIMENSIONS: ASSOCIATED BUILDINGS: [ ] yes [ ] no Building types: ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION (remember to provide photographs of the building with this form): -additional page(s) CONSTRUCTION HISTORY (include description and dates of major additions, alterations, or demolitions): -additional page(s) HISTORICAL BACKGROUND (discuss important persons and events associated with this building): INFORMATION SOURCES (be specific): -additional page(s) SIGNIFICANCE (check appropriate categories) Architectural significance: Historical significance: [ ] represents the work of a master [ ] associated with significant person(s) [ ] possess high artistic value [ ] associated with significant event [ ] represents a type, period, [ ] associated with a pattern of events or method of construction [ ] contributes to a historic district STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE (briefly justify the significance checked above): FORM COMPLETED BY NAME: ADDRESS: PHONE: DATE: MATERIALS REQUEST Following the review of this evaluation form, I would like to receive the following materials: [ ] National Register of Historic Places nomination form and instructions [ ] 3% in. computer disk or [ ] CD in Word format or [ ] hard copy version [ ] State Register of Historic Properties nomination form and instructions (note that properties listed in the National Register are automatically listed in the State Register) [ ] 3Y: in. Computer disk or [ ] CD in Word format or [ ] hard Copy version [ ] Federal Investment Tax Credit information (OAHP1515) [ ] State Income Tax Credit for Historic Preservation information (OAHP1322b) [ ] State Historical Fund grant information (OAHP1510) Page 1 of 1 http://photoswest.org/photos/10024376/10024411.jpg 10120/2005 STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE AND ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION OF OLINGER RESIDENCE, 7495 WEST 29T" AVENUE The Olinger Family and Their Denver Legacy The city of Denver was formed in 1860 by the combination of the Auraria and Denver City camps at the confluence of the Platt River and Cherry Creek. These camps were established when it was reported that gold was discovered in Cherry Creek in 1858. This news created a huge boom in population and the development of what is now the Downtown, Lower Downtown, Capital Hill, Auraria Campus, and Chessman Park areas. As with any burgeoning pioneer community, one of the mainstay businesses is the funerary and undertaking concerns. This drew John W. Olinger (1851-1901) and his wife Emma (1861-1932) from Santa Fe, New Mexico, to the area in 1890 to begin one of the regions' foremost business entities at 15th and Platt Street In 1908, the Olingers built the first building in the area to be constructed as a mortuary in the Rocky Mountain region at 2600-16th Street (16t° at Boulder) and was operated by John W.'s son George W. Olinger Sr. (1882-1954) and mother, George's wife Margaret (1881-1968) and John W's wife Emma. The growth of the business was marked in 1930 by the purchase of the Yeager Mortuary, located at Speer Boulevard at Sherman (this location was sold by the corporation in 1981). In 1944, the business partnership of Olinger, Bona & Van Derbur was formed between the Olingers and Joseph E. Bona (1887-1978), his wife, and Francis S. VanDerbur (1907- 1984). Sometime shortly thereafter, the families of Olinger and Van Derber were joined by the marriage of daughter Gwendolyn Olinger (1908-1996) to a junior Van Derbur (to be checked/identified). Expansion continued with the building of another Olinger Mortuary on East Colfax at Magnolia to service the Park Hill area in 1951. The 1950's also saw the former Joss Mortuary, 2775 South Broadway, convert to Olingers in 1953. The concern of Olinger Mortuaries, Inc, was formed in 1959 with Francis Van Derber as President. Growth of the business was particularly strong during the 1960's, when Olinger Mortuaries, Inc. expanded into cemetery ownership, including the acquisition of Eastlawn Cemetery in 1963, the building of Evergreen Cemetery and the Mount Lindo Cemetery and Mausoleum the same year, and the purchase of the world's largest mausoleum with crematory, the Tower of Memories (built in 1926) in Crown Hill Memorial Park, Wheat Ridge. Mt. Lindo Cemetery, located twenty minutes west of Denver, is the location of one of the area's most identifiable landmarks, the largest electrically-lighted cross in the world, which is illuminated nightly. With the death of George W. Sr. occurring in 1954, and the death of Margaret Olinger in 1968, their residence at 7495 West 29th Avenue, directly across Wadsworth Boulevard from Crown Hill Memorial Park, was converted to yet another Olinger Mortuary in 1970. Modifications to the home include the addition of the "Wadsworth Chapel" to facilitate services. With the 1980's came further change and growth to the Olinger enterprise, including the purchase of the Chapel Hills Cemetery in 1985, the Highlands Cemetery and Mortuary in 1986, and the Noonan-Bettman Mortuary in 1987. It should be noted that all property holdings of Olinger Mortuaries, Inc., were sold to Morlan International, Inc. in 1987, and changed hands again in 1987 when they were sold to S.C. I. of Houston, Texas, the current owner to date. The growth and development of the Olinger legacy was due to five generations of a single Denver family and their business associates. Their contribution to the Denver economic climate, as well as Colorado history, was more than profound. This is illustrated by the fact that one of the most notable of Olinger funeral services was that of Colonel William F. Cody ('Buffalo Bill"), who died in Denver on January 10, 1917. His body was placed in a receiving vault at Olingers 16" and Boulder Streets facility until the service on June 3, 1917 and was buried on Lookout Mountain in Golden. The gravesite is considered one of the most revered landmarks in the state of Colorado. To all Denver area residents, the numerous Olinger facilities sprinkled throughout the region have remained a familiar and tasteful mainstay to the community, and a reminder of our rich cultural and economic heritage.' Description of Olinger Residence, 7495 West 29r' Avenue: The former residence of Margaret and George W. Olinger Sn. is an estate built in occupying the northeast comer of West 29~' Avenue and Wadsworth Boulevard. Original elements of the property consist of the main residence, surrounding gardens, a stucco pergola colonnade roughly 200 - 300 feet long running parallel to Wadsworth Boulevard, well house, sunken garden, caretaker's home, and original barn. Remnants of the formal grounds are still in evidence all across the property. The main structure, designed by , sits deep on the lot facing south and is surrounded by many mature cottonwood trees. The home's original main entrance is accessed from 29r' Avenue by a double walkway flanked curbside by terra cotta-clad lanterns with lions-head details. Large terra cotta vessels flank the steps to the entrance, which boast globe-topped torcheres. A port-cochere is located on the west side of the building, with French doors leading directly into the home's Drawing Room. The original structure demonstrates intricate exterior brick patterning and eaveswork (see detail photograph), topped by a Spanish tile roof (unusual for the area). The sightline from 29s' Avenue denotes the structures' stately though restrained single-storied Prairie- style rooffine, though a second story is in evidence at the rear of the house over the automobile compartments. The pergola delineates the western edge of the property and consists of a double row of stucco pillars, which are each at least 2 feet in diameter, connected overhead by a grape arbor (see detail photograph). Mature rose bushes grow at the base of each pillar. An original concrete pathway leads down the center of the colonnade north, toward the caretaker's house, past an original pump house of the same construction as the main structure. Remnants of the formal gardens, such as concrete garden steps, are evident all along the pergola. Original hooks which one held strings of oriental lanterns during summer parties hosted by the Olinger family in the 1920's, 1930's, and 1940's are still intact. The main building on this site was converted to an operating mortuary in 1970, and a large chapel was added to facilitate funeral services. Other modifications to the site and structure include the paving of a large portion of the rear gardens, extending almost to the caretaker's home (see detail photograph). This paving was done, however, with high regard to the large cottonwood trees in the area, most of which were spared removal. At this time the exterior red brick of the main residence was painted white. Among the most memorable elements on the property was the presence of three large-scale replications of statuary from antiquity (the Discus Thrower and Venus De Milo being the most recognizable), which were present until just recently, when their deteriorating condition mandated their removal. The main house, pergola, and surrounding gardens are already highly regarded by many long-time Denver residents as landmarks due to their sheer architectural majesty. The fact that the area was once primarily farmland dictates that most structures from that era are farmhouses or outbuildings leaning toward a purely functional and somewhat rural architectural nature. This fact alone sets the Olinger residence apart from any other historic estate in West Denver, whether extant or not, for it was built in a grand modified- Prairie style and was embellished with gracious components associated almost exclusively with the well-heeled Denver establishment of the early part of the 20i° century. True, estates such are this (Bonfils, Bowmar, etc.) once dotted the farmland of the Front Range, however, this may be the one remaining country estate from early Denver on the West Side. It is incontrovertible that it should be revered as a symbol of early Denver society that is utterly irreplaceable. As of this date the surrounding area, though mostly residential, has succumbed to rapid commercial redevelopment (not all successful), and this particular property, with its elegant and graceful presence, adds rich historical value to Wheat Ridge. Simply put, it is a rare and beautiful architectural specimen in fundamentally pristine condition, further enhanced by the luxury of open space.Z 1. Factual data courtesy of Donald M. Chase, Colorado Funeral Director's Association ("History of Colorado Funeral Enterprises by City or Town") 2. Architectural description researched and written solely by Kevin F. Murphy THE WAY LIFE SHOUT BE LIB vilcP Arhnr Photo by tnnu ~,nnn- _;,CAr the Arvada Police run along Wadsworth May 2 in the 21st annual Law Enforcement Torch Wa fficers from Wheat Ridge and all over Colorado took part in the run that benefitted Special no kAS officers in Pursuit "It Si10WS the drive and emony in Denver. Afterward, tteWtde help - the official Flame of Hope. = he riey for Special 1notivatiOn Of human . Torch headed off to Greeley to- kick kick off the summer games Colorado spirit, and how (these Former Wichfta Pohce Chief iC.Si1TP6RER:"" `athieteS) Ire Willing t0 Richard LaMunyon founded it] +hP,tnrcb-run about two de t= t}? #a1RidgePO11ce zigr . xi- ro amhas raised awarem Tula Balafas should OlCler t0 COmpete.7 and more than $15 million e at home resting, of _ lust a day, after Paula Balafas, Wheat. ; ng to acwrittenstatement e"Tou estTeh, a ldgePoiceofficer gh Balafas said over the ye stretch from Idaho she has pamcrpatedin tfiet Chief Homy she ng At 'her desk. Bala ' inbney and awareness for Spe because she is inspired liyr±* be 'trek as part of the :;vial -Olympics Colorado. The it represents. 7cement Torch Run, run included officers from "It,s important to make f[ Special Olym the leffeison County S! e i s aware of how special Bala refits ado "Department aK tnrei as the vciaf Olympics are>;" , s the Along day," Balafas Lakewood, Arvada andWheat motivationoof humdari Ridge policedepartments , was one of several Officers trat eled more than and how Qvercome great a Ad new recruits who `1;700 miles across the state ' willing o join forces from ju- with several torches until in oiderio compete: x-_ s around the state in Thursday, when three of them ; long effort to'raise combined in a unificationcer-, See TORCH page2 LOCAL NEWS ®SPORTS ®CLASSIf1EDS j `INDEX Bruce Buckler, owner of Cutting Edge & ` Arvada Police' officers have Framing Gallery said he believesmanyW done several other fund-raisers " ycidg"zLists might go to other cities bec. Special Olym- to supportthe they don't know they have an event of thew orvn.IfmorepeopleattendedtheFirstFriday < Several police departments yyalkthelocalart communitywouldflourish," ratsed:money.throughout;,2he "headded _ , yeaz to benefit the games, said ~11 I'll, ioutletforthemselyes,°hesaid.``' woman for Special Olympics Fourgalie esparticipate in the First Friday,_' Colorado Last year, local law Walkoiii8ihAvenueinWheat'Ridge:Ga, enforcementagenciesand'of- ieudsviodow,BigSlry Espresso CaM, Cut- ficerstlonateil$301,000toSRe- ngEdgeF{ammgg(Galleryandstudio 38. cial0lytopics CoIlmado llteeventsta=at6pn',andendsamund'`. 'Gall Pundsackanofficidfor or9p.m: aependingonthedemand,Ama1= Special Olympics Colorado, is anosaid.: grateful for all the support for a _ -the organization 'Special Olympics Colorar IDS benefit ' do ts`ao fortuttate tohave the . statewide support of iaiv en- L forcement to promote aware- davisit . twootherGoldenchuiches 2 -ress and fundraising efforts .:an,whichisliostiugthesaleandis . nened ' said. , ofher ?'located at 177Q7 W AthAva, and , sMu ,,'CalvatyEpsibpAChurchplan to send congiegantstoAftican wun- ;fries to develop close links with thou , urhes :;AIDS-iiddencommuoitim- st of All needs from the thou- l CHAPEL, FROMPAGE1 '2002 %'sands of items on We which'- t, I 'tange from skis to vintage lamps CityCounciL broad. to refrigerators-will be divided Whitesaidstepsforreioningthe . ttrreeways tobenefit theAlDS-re- property include `.`havingaplanof eyare. ;latedcauses ofeacltchurch. whereth6builditgsaregoingfoga harles "I dorit think most people in landscaping andwhereparlozrgis ' ourmuntryteallyhaveanyideaof tobe going ttodo '*eauentofthec iw,"saidDebo Afterthecityrevleoftpre-ap- iown- rah Rios, oropram director of First placation. a planning commission 111 L411f hefacil- :C1CJV~'W1,rt1L Monica andChades'sonAbra- vw-...,, said. I 40 chit- hamhasseenthesituationinZant= a, owcutive assistan Adela Pen ioncen- biainperson. " th at the Rose Arbor Chapel, said the chapel * l d all i ` l $75,000. Everywhere youwattcyousee;'.. . o nc u e e w sa "Ia7ce' peopleonthesaeet," yct caretaker'shouseandthebamsbe ecessary youseeindowntownDenwr.Only°:, .hindthechapeC- e rmunity ;iesnotjustdownwwn.lltesaddest:; nes Breaking ground for th Lamas- thingismostofthepeopleaielads', '?dsapelisearpectedtobeginint>L salewith -raisingthemselves" fall shesaid Golden & Highlands' Ranch Day Camps. 6113 - 8/12, age 7-12 M-F, 9-2:30 1 wk camps Home pick-up and drop-off available We've served thousands of kids with. our school mobile program & camps. www.avid4.com 720-249-2412 I~/ 0/ uibel, 23, talk B Esquibel, 23, talk' Cervantes. Esq Hansen after a difficult ch portto lead a productive t Foster f ByMFF FRANCdS ieH e>u_S>mews.com problems , after she, rlife. r brought treated me saidEsquit i lei for four' j a school. I that withol I ~varitedthecutelit8i troubled ones are ct Theliansensar ly. So foster famw I'll I ~ ~ y 0 C.A ~N R~ ~-b ~.O ~G'•O^.A R~ 0' ° ONq ~ ❑ A ~ A O Y p ~ ~ O w ^'~°O ~ fD 0..'. a V. A Y P~ ~ AC Y" Sf0 A~• m7l sin=~wc.<YCOy~'A, C;;,, }p. c -•v w 3 m ~e d F n_ o Y' L El o, o- a -0c 0.o S w Z 0. < W (An R G .n. [ ^ H 3 t-j 0.00 vON, N V y N C 7 pc a~ ~ O. ^ ti ~ y 0 N A A A ' 0 Gtl a P N 0 y m p 0. ( c vi `h r a = S N N~ a? c O O A ca a N 0 W ~ ~i S O O S9 A ~ a-~ 3 3 V Y {u Q n 7 'O S P O S O A 0 9~'' C^ m A~ Y o A c c 00 ~ ~ 04 y {Rp O ~ y . ° O Q Q. S O ~ ~ ~ Pi A~ Q Oy A 7 m S _ N R n..y 0: ° w C a Y 0 ~ R T. O S ^ ~ ] ~ ? (nE ti O C ~ ~ 7 W ..j O n A W Y `G A 0 C SN OyS N„~W ~m~~,T•C Y~~0 aft* A Y R A `G ♦p S 3 N C L v+jA in ~P%y Nn OT.roN~~. A. RQ°C.N+ - a o n£ v 0.Y R 0 A N Oy-. b ? N 0: ' G, ^ 7 ~ N Y p W +~i p .<rJ S.^• A 0 ".'.A p° W~ S p to A .E o " Q ~ d F F c = y c'< a_'D ~ fD ='m s o f ~ ~ n., Y m co. Q. y c'o 3 ~ y C ~ N N ^ ^ ~ ~ ti o., o C ~ ~ Q' ^0 OS E A O a N ~ ~ N 0 o- a_.~. S"' r:-< ass om -+08~a'• cc '~A 0 Ov O' R io tc C Y io A R 0. Y ~ ~ •-e ^ 0 vi w S o w ~ ~ a o- rn ° o a P. tro ? A, e Civic.minded Oli ~guNaER Coattot~edi~orriPag~2 paid in full. My grandfather probably had too much compassion to be an outstand- ing businessman because he gave and gave and gave. He did not die a wealthy man at all." The Olinger largess' extended to churches, hospitals. civic and charita- nger generously volunteered throughout, t the home front he was"; an active Rotarian, specializing in boys work, and a member of Highlands Masonic Lodge. A devout Presbyterian, he donated land for the Geneva Glen Christian Camp. Olinger loved to collect inspiring quo- tations, print them on colorful paper and mail them nff to fnrrner Highlanders ser- ble `causes, schools and his beloved . vicemen,shut-ins Highlander Boys. thought: in need of The civic-minded Olinger volunteered "There's no limit ti for the Y.M.C.A. during.World War I, set;- do if he doesn't can ing six months in France as a Ralson forread one especialll servicemen and their families. Within' "Oh, did he get rr days of the attack on pearl Harbor he send mail," declare. again stepped up to help families, this sisters often stuffed time for the American Red Cross. "There its to their gragdpai isn't much a man of my age camdo in tons of those say r active service," he told a reporter, "but I smite.;"He had a for feel this situation is serious enough to just walk down and try. Everyone must pitch inand help by er and 'stuff the_i doing the things he's best fitted to do. I ` recalls,. ",He'd pay like, boys and young men, and have long penny a packet. <I u nd anyone else he a little bucking up.' the good a'man can who gets the credit, she says with a le and we would one after anoth ope.",Knowlton imething like a tried to-understand their problems and if I got ;a quarter. His secretai In something about them. I feel f can put include some stamps and send that interest to good use." During WWII, shut-ins. They used to send him thousands of Denver-area servicemen beautiful letters back using thi ^eceived birthday cards from. Olinger. On and tell him that these little sal made their day ' hem to to most . stamps {^l developer and churchman he may have World been, but to the four granddaughters on whom he' doted, George Olinger was sim- t(0{) < ply "Gaba." "He was an, extremely loving m IB ILL ll t~J~ an. He was very, very good to all my my tern and me," says Valerie, "He called my grandmother 'Momo,' and we grandchil- at Lakeside Center dren called her "Grandma Momo."; es RaItNE--- Sotlhill$ and listening to Gabriel Heater's radio news of an evening. lavehirds dmh-an ore Olinger, was".perhaps generous to a Cages -Toys - Feed fault. His boundless' charity sometimes Supplies Classes.-Grooming vexed Margaret and was likely the cause Senior Citizen Discount ze; of occasional financial strain for the 303-43344329 company Close friend, confidant and senior vice president Joe Bona periodical5801'West 44th Avenue ly purchased part ownership to infuse cash. George would buy him out again m when;thinas improved, They learned to 3 influence !in 1920s,,tlo K urged folks 1101 bury, their d through catholic-owl mortuary. In 1 the firm becar partnership Olinger, Bona Olinger. son-ir Fran Cis waJ: av....: chain to proudly resumed A beaming George Olinger t the family legacy work in this WWII-era photo. Snapshots of his granddaughter with 'their pur adorn the walls behind his desk. photo coodery of John and Valerie Horc chase of Horan & Mccodaty in 1986, , h Another George Olinger legacy sur- first thing my friends open in the marl vives, After his passing, Margaret contin- ing." She sums up her grandfather tli ued mailing inspirational packets to way: "He was a wonderful family man: shut-ins and Nancy Knowlton is still stuff- man of great honesty and integrity, I ing envelopes with her grandfather's say- was so loving. I never saw him lose 1 ings. "To this day I still have some that cool. I never heard him say a swear woi I'm tucking into envelopes," she says. He just loved every day., He had not o "His work lives on." She's also taken it to enemy in the world."'A fitting tribute cyberspace in a thought-for-the-day e- this'-businessman and philanthrof "I try, and send it every with North Denver roots ` mail to friends. night around 10:30 or 11.00 so it's the Terns of Use Privacy SEa'temeOt 0 26m 0 '26y ~ 3m5' - x daVl Ai1NI~N . sunnmov ~ym MOV«w axa oMNave mad]~aX.x ~ - orlon aY3Htlmo L4%3 rw rY>- , " ~n. r 37Nif p.W1Y'LSR3 3%M1NX OLLd] M3JU @ . LXnr x . ]Jlbf MNI9NIW 14[3 3aMXtlX ?C4tlw B Y3aC l3\YYr £ HNtlX:rW015 O am v]W LMWSY ~ ~ - . %oe glbnm TIVJ5 .11lfd4y9 "tl WFll3WM U mnnb3LYM~q ].®3 YJ ~ m dJ13F: dAlrM p Sa V3tl LwMNM v~-~r1L~~t rfn JIpMJ { " « ]Xw1v.OXL[ LSn "aR MItl351A[N ~ LY s3a RWf ]IfIWUH 3btl $Y LwISrJ ]N a3 QllU - J3Y a LAa] YyJNLL5MU3Y: TTMYX afn35AbVLIMS ® .:-Mega ztY MS3!r Sv - V X mz x,La] A'° T mgxn LwlNron areaf ® " k sdrw .cn a Ja ufam x" is raa AmnIM wxaxro Las o " " ama nra ~ w.w s, x a aHm a mss aYJic a+ew 43 Ls s " " y 3Ia6\Y WF. Ls3x 2 _F wrasY a : m apes ax L n rcv. fgi>ss s3vs wod p ~ ° V aJUrO d.Y gGU BtlN BaW T/LLdNS ~ a°~v 0.X $ K v xxb arrow m -Lr«V n L0[9 ~ 8 S . ]L41Y.Y H(ea J3tl 1B . q MO a : w TryLNN W 1i3a15 , . y(~ -MLWI Y51 ]11SItl Yd a-IVXAV a r '9YR m3 MD O~X'Nj w oL azrsstl3lW 3Ml tl,PY - Lax SY ua3doda 3JSx 6aaA3ltW&MLa0.MS6aM' YMAL Y2 X/e .o xm rrv 3 Lams I - 5 ~ 'J3M :♦LS - da~iN 3tlt1 ~ :C LC t 3g1a] ` AN smvh~ 3tl 5Bgp 3.L0[ASS IX BY ipN dmr~umtlma~ \ M may Mf ~ 0.~ %x aXN,ASrRAT: Sg9S \ ` T V ~oGm 1a~ ro '--n sAwus .a fo-Lwmeiu~+wi am „4a dJ mmuwm aifia wx - \ ~ ax mWJ tl `b0 MAOgamx NYI s tOt~ZtS NMJ 3NL XMB W rr~- v a- 5llLL U3[ ` \ Y 1 rows Ma !V ']K03TKSL \ L \ \ \ ~ nY v59roN J]mya'µxJ ~ AL'L J ~ 3L31pxb mJ X\ Kg \ ` ~ f £z - :31 bY.3♦W44xIK0 KL♦ LIR~ \Y S} l \ ` II~H . a U 'tw tl pv aJPo iv b L lLLYla \ (N. \ ~ \ 93d As ' { ~ ryV NN SI 3 NmvaSX aRS ' ww avxfn nx a°a3e lxroe Ith'r «Wr q6 l\ \ ` \ \ 1'6%1 r1 aBL[J . P @5 fJ 3nn NItl033~XJ LNW Y9N6B NWta 3w '3dW3 idle pp g 1 A GS tt]~ f ~ a~ \ S)9r 0~3X FtlN'bbg3d . z axm] v'xors loenszware 1 lmma Y m n y 153M TM n l g M ^ N \ ry NUmd sswamY \ \ \ 3~~1]rA 'a N3REV8 Y.tL ` \l a3wf mm ~ a.L I 5~~. 9 pl NIMS aiWA] LSV3x11pN Nl aN[~ 3N0 31N31Nt r uHMf OML.NS1Y.r30 .v..M.h.6gx f0 vNaYJ9 MX(6,$ HYdI39 U.54Ya B b ~ 9 \ V P dY- M a 91 - 4 xt 4bls t g ~ \ \ l \I' ' V LJ m are 35 MN 4Htl]' D " 3eroba~ill rM 1 3J MYNY UMdtlTJ t3> CMI s3]v Ilad NN11xI15 -I[ ) 31eLL 03bONN1 5 55 QYP jY ' ' 3P'Po + ♦ 1 \ ]1a55.Z" . n 9 5 - 'AmM5 5 1J W LNd3tld SLL r IYNY N Z $ n C \ NAI [.g ~ - ` N C ~p "Pql AL O LL4 Ilya NuaL M' KK 111=4N ALItlf9E Aamd3 lb]3aLL NMaY rFJd LW"NW6 _ \ glal P `n 44 ~ ~ ' ~ n I \ t fXw] i \ r` x -L]ag i[ 3N x L " ~ \ 6--e.. qa .e } D~ Np 2 Y 9d8 YLSItl d3kY0.PW(e VPoJINd1 Po LLMMrW NJf aYR Mf N a pAV pI 31li N lON s 8 lL \ \ i`ye. JA4] AC OL es ' ~ \ \ ~ FK 'S ~ sad taxamvw xw fasYfd3.~aXO s tlu a " ' s \ ~ ` \ \ wrmv ~ X L g ~ . Y s.o n 5 Al" NYdpi se ' Y ° m`r= \ A mmNa Sawa R bss r n l` ` ` X L g ' r °m s3W V la 3 ba 3dY M o ;o \ \L <e La Y vtletl z a n 9mYr r rX d 3dRm]:avix; arrc 33 [oro$ Hxtlb fo nxruatol lrwusoa wrvnxvrv yya; edm \ 3]Y \ ` ~ ' a N a \ 1 \ T Jd f en .aLt °s ~ 2EOP tquaN. p ~ f . ~ -C \ ~ ^ Narx ~°u , JOIL ' \ S"r 5 3d 30x 3HJ S.IINIpX :C \t \~.a~Ae\' + c Am ,undns._io vJ,a \ ,nrn, . zTY~, \ L4gJ re'aei slvrn 3W3 a'fRHa urNxip%'pvu»] ~ \ ~ NbHM SW3R3tlMrII "WSK ad]gY3Hdb1ry~b 3ry~j1pH.3JY[61a 3lMn K ]r{m9pSr p a'ptl~ 1a] SIpX3a.T5Y3n N \'lv'~ \ \ - 31M3d . ~ - . aiwrs Jlu ]»u MFIllN a3 5b3mrR"xglrJtiubi] snu M31e4 No' oMN+tl sdsx nr re 1 2~ \ \'~\3 \ Z , S \ \ \ i y `t \ \ mwmrY m~ ~ 1 RA-,4 5 WI&I a - dsn dl(L raUM N Ae lmld]LV^QxY a3~Aam'uT Lw o sx3Pons ms ~ - nul arm Rbvhlx xm"sLNJk¢labia'MwP 1N♦f XmmmR rmf1Y 3a0jY 3N]M xn +N(M No A1w'ns Y~tLapmN T'r' 6f, Xa 1N( .\1Ni 15 9 4W qM AYyaHl9 1. =X= U k Nf " N (fi 3 ' ~ ~ Itt'd'30 ~19N3d &qY~f ` ~ f 3<`TI 1I3 3 ' 10L /JI4gE r Sfl Tt J r! mMU W SY XM9N% Ala3xtlO] Ypl{YbaabD CT 14t 53NN35 Iib3xN ~.'ymW 85' W' 2 s+S <nvvaa]~ 3 I ` u ti . . 3 rl Alb ~ w a~aJnn awa mLJnvm _ AfN1M ]O 31 3J Y mo q. s N3aaa r ..1 GSV3.a y n: F b3a]da ] • tl3mh1 i0 UNN r10Ya pb . s'3 . n 3vad LsaLJ SY ~ aJnx 15Y3 Ow N1 X11 P>t y Na ]'MCIIq j Ulypl 4 'oN'a9WJ lbSbffl3` fo +LWm'wx w ,wyya cr ]9J V'YSaxaxt ] ss - 'ax9~iow 3LO mor,nmp e~~xx~a+aA ' y - ; : " ' 6{]a(~TlfIOB ullI0M5WM ➢96Z,<ONa 31{N3AY H16Z1$3M 96tl#" 'Wd N19 3Hl`30 1S3M 69 30NV-9 'H1nQS £'d4HSNM01".'9L NOUOO S 30 b/CI. 35 3H1 'NI (MVOOl 2l3ObVd ,OA.~JnS V17V 4-7 COLORADO ARCHITECTS _ BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH / J Architect: William Ellsworth Fisher, Arthur Addison Fisher, erney ,se Birth/Death Dates: William (1871-1937), Arthur (1878-1965), Alan (1905-1978) Practice Dates: - Firms: L William Fisher, Architect (1892-1901) Fisher & Huntington (William Fisher and Daniel Huntington; 1901-1905) William Fisher, Architect (1905-1907) William Fisher Architect and Brother (William and Arthur Fisher; 1907-1910) William E. Fisher and Arthur A. Fisher, Architects (1910-1937) Arthur A. Fisher and Alan B. Fisher, Architects (1937-1956) Fisher, Fisher and Davis (Arthur A. Fisher, Alan B. Fisher, and Rodney S. Davis; 1956- 1959) Fisher and Davis (Alan B. Fisher and Rodney S. Davis; 1959-1967) Fisher, Reece and Johnson (Alan B. Fisher, John D. Reece, and Hilary M. Johnson; 1967-1978) Biographical Information Architects by Design: The Fisher Legacy Few families have impacted the look of Denver as the architects of the Fisher family. The careers of three Fisher architects have spanned nearly six decades and their cumulative designs represents some of the most prominent and acclaimed work in the state. Allen S. Fisher moved his family from Canada to Denver in 1885. His son William Ellsworth Fisher (1871-1937) was the first to enter the field of architecture. William began as a draftsman for the Denver firm of Balcomb & Rice in 1890. Two years later, after a brief period of study with the New York firm of C. Powell Karr, Fisher opened the firm of William Fisher, Architect. The firm evolved in name and partnership several times over the next 57 years in name and partnership, however, for the next 57 years an architect of the Fisher family would continue to offer services to the citizens and businesses of Denver and the Rocky Mountain Region. For ten years Fisher worked alone, designing mostly residents, particularly starter homes for young couples. In 1901 Daniel Riggs Huntington, a fellow draftsman from Balcomb & Rice formed a partnership with Fisher that lasted five years. Their work included increasingly expensive residences as well as apartment and commercial buildings until Huntington moved to Seattle in 1905. After two years again on his own, William formed a partnership with his brother, Arthur Addison Fisher (1878-1965) who had studied at the Beaux-Arts Atelier Barber in New York and apprenticed in the New York offices of Don Barber and Benjamin Morris. This pairing lasted thirty years until William's death. The firm prospered, constructed the majority of the known remaining designs which included several prominent homes, churches, hospitals, and schools as well as commercial designs such as the Denver City Tramway Building at 1100 14th Street and the A. C. Foster Building at 912 16th Street. Both listed in the National Register. Arthur served on the Denver Planning Commission and gained recognition for his hospital designs. In 1937 William's son, Alan B. Fisher (1905-1978), already working for the firm became a partner with his uncle. Alan had completed his schooling at the University of Pennsylvania and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Until Arthur's retirement in 1956 the designed COLORADO ARCHITECTS BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH numerous commercial buildings including several hospitals out of state, worked on the State Capital Annex, and the Denver Public Library with Burnham Hoyt. Rodney Davis joined the Fisher partnership in 1956 and continued with Alan for 11 years. Alan Fisher then formed a partnership with John D. Reece and Hillary M. Johnson until his death in 1978. Alan became active in historic preservation, was a founding member of the Denver Landmark Commission, and served as chairman from 1970 to 1973. Of 67 existing buildings in Denver that can be credited to the Fisher firm, 50 of them are either individually listed, within districts, or have been determined eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. In other words some 75% of the firm's identifiable remaining work in Denver retains enough of its integrity to be deemed worthy of recognition. It is doubtful that many architectural firms have left such a legacy. Certainly there is no other in Colorado. Credited Buildings Building Name Location Site No. rDate Assessment William Fisher, Architect 1892-1901 Unnamed House 1763 High St., Denver 5DV2749 1893 Unnamed House 1364 Franklin St., 1895 Wyman Denver Local HD Unnamed House 1455 Gaylord St., 1895 Demolished Denver Reed House 1040 Humboldt St., 5DV166.7 1899 Humboldt St. Denver HD Iliff House 2145 S. Adams, 5DV433 1899 Denver McDonald House 1800 Gilpin St., Denver 5DV2451 1899 Fisher & Huntington 1901-1905 Smith House 1801 York St., Denver 5DV907 1902 National Re ister Unnamed House 1368 Gaylord St., 1902 Wyman Denver Local HD Unnamed House 1345 Race St., Denver 1902 Wyman Local HD Unnamed House 2202 E. 14th, Denver 1902 Wyman Local HD Mulvihill-Gurtler House 4209 W. 38th Ave., 5DV636 1904 Denver Unnamed House 1133 E. 3rd Ave., 5DV6338 1905 Denver William Fisher, Architect 1905-1907 Fred A. Thompson 801 Humboldt St., 1905 House (Chessman Park book Denver credits both W. Fisher and A. Fisher as architects COLORADO ARCHITECTS BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Fred A. Thompson 809 Humboldt St., 1905 House (Chessman Park book Denver credits both W. Fisher and A. Fisher as architects Uriah Hellister House 103 Franklin St., 5DV167 1906 Country Club Denver HD West House 100 Franklin St., 5DV167 1906 Country Club Denver HD William Fisher Architect and Brother 1907-1910 Durango Public Library 1188 E. Second St., 51-P.3037 1907 Local Durango Landmark Sullivan-Cosgriff House 1130 E. 7th Ave., 5DV344 1907 Denver Bethuel Webster House 370 Humboldt St., 5DV167 1907 Country Club Denver HD Unnamed Apartment 820 Humboldt St./1515 1908 Building E. 8th Ave., Denver Warren United Methodist 1630 E. 14th Ave., 1908 Wyman Church Denver Local HD Liva Kountze Brown 135 Humboldt St., 5DV167 1908 Country Club House Denver HD Arthur Fisher House 128 Gilpin St., Denver 5DV167.14 1909 County Club HD National Safety Vault Co. 1536 Welton St., 5DV501 1909 Demolished Denver St. Stephens Episcopal 2552 Williams St., 5DV7024 1909 Church Denver Parker House 120 Franklin St., 5DV167 1909 County Club Denver HD Wolff Manufacturing 1626 Wazee St., 5DV47.16 1909 Lower Company Building Denver Downtown (Rockmount Ranch Wear Certified HD Building) William E. Fisher and Arthur A. Fisher, Architects 1910-1937 William E. Fisher House 110 Franklin St., 5DV167 1910 County Club Denver HD Railway Exchange 1715 Champa St., 5DV526 1910 National Building Addition Denver Register Denver City Tramway 1100 14th St., Denver 5DV140 1911 National Building Register A.C. Foster Building 912 16th St., Denver 5DV142 1911 National Register Isaac Solomon 6401 W. Colfax Ave., 5JF178 1911 National Synagogue, Jewish Lakewood Register Consumptives' Relief Society Wright House 345 Gilpin St., Denver 5DV167 1911 I Country Club HD 3 COLORADO ARCHITECTS BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Katherine Wolcott Toll 919 Race St., Denver 1912 House Blount House 314 Lafayette St., 5DV167 1912 Country Club Denver HD J.C. Penney Building 21-39 Broadway, 5DV60 1912 Denver Unnamed Building 2-10 Broadway, 5DV58 1912 Denver Bethuel Webster House 140 Humboldt St., 5DV167 1912 Country Club Denver HD Unnamed Bank Building 2239 E. Colfax Ave., 1913 Demolished Denver McPhee & McGinnity 2301 Blake St., Denver 5DV1490 1913 National Building Re ister Lafayette Hughes- 300 High St., Denver 5DV167 1913 Country Club William V. Hodges HD House Railway Exchange 1715 Champa St., 5DV526 1913 Champa Building (Additlon) Denver Street HD Broadway National Bank 100 Broadway, Denver 5DV54 1914 Building Colonel William E. 320 High St., Denver 5DV167 1914 Country Club Hughes-Gerald Hughes HD House Abbott House 160 Downing, Denver 5DV167 1915 Country Club HD Colorado National Bank 900-918 17th St., 5DV524 1915 Building Denver Foster-Buell Mansion 2700 E. Hampden, 5AH222 1915 Englewood Lorraine Lodge/Charles 900 Colorow Rd., 5JF323 1916 National Boettcher Summer Home Golden Re ister H.C. Van Schaack 323 High St., Denver 5DV167 1916 Country Club House HD McCartney House 350 Gilpin St., Denver 5DV167 c. 1916 Country Club HD WeickerTransfer 1700 15th St., Denver 5DV47.43 1918 Denver Local Landmark Daniel A. Millet House 860 Vine St., Denver 1919 Morgan's Subdivision Local HD McPhee & McGinnity 2301 Blake St., Denver 5DV1490 1919 National Building addition Re ister Holloway-McKenzie 180 Lafayette, Denver 5DV167 1920 Country Club House HD U.S. National 817 17th St., Denver 5DV843.16 1920 National Bank/Guaranty Bank Register Building COLORADO ARCHITECTS BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Green House 149 Gilpin St., Denver 55V167.15 1921 CountryClub HD Morey Middle School 840 E. 14 Ave., 5DV2090 1921 Denver Local Denver Landmark Voorhies Memorial, Civic Colfax & 15' St., 5DV161 1921 Civic Center Center West Denver HD Acacia Apartments 429 E. 14 Ave., 1922 Denver Bernard Apartments 850 Humboldt St., 1923 Denver The Waldman 1515 E. 9 Ave., 5DV2116 1923 Apartments Denver Company town of Parco Wyoming 1923-25 Sinclair Kuykendall House 380 High, Denver 5DV167 1924 Country Club HD Neusteter Department 720-726 16 St., 5DV496 1924 National Store Denver Re ister Lion Hotel 1425-1433 Welton St., 5DV1817 1924 Denver Wildo Building 1441 Welton St., 5DV1826 1924 Denver Denver Country Club, First Ave. & University 5DV167 1925 Country Club Clubhouse HD remodel University of Colorado 4200 E. 9' Ave., 5DV935 1925 School of Medicine and Denver Hospital Weicker Warehouse 2100 E. Colfax, Denver 5DV716 1925 E Midland Savings Building 444 17 St., Denver 5DV1733 1926 Register South High School 1700 E. Louisiana 5DV2092 1926 Ave., Denver Presbyterian Hospital Denver 1926 B'nai B'rith Infirmary for Colorado Blvd. & E. 1926 National Jewish Hospital Colfax Ave., Denver Jewish Consumptives' 6401 W. Colfax Ave., 5JF178 1926 National Relief Society Lakewood Register Max D. Neuster Rehabilitation Buildin YWCA Building 1535 Tremont pi., 5DV505 1926 Demolished Denver Taussig House 1625 E. 3m, Denver 5DV167 1926 Country Club HD Tower of Memories, 8500 W. 29 Ave., 5JF467 1926 National Crown Hill Cemetery Lakewood Register with Charles A. Smith Davis & Shaw Furniture 1434 Champa St., 5DV843.1 1927 Building Denver COLORADO ARCHITECTS BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Ideal Building 821 17th St., Denver 5DV125 1927 National (addition & remodel) Register Texas Pavilion for 6401 W. Colfax Ave., 5JF178 1927 National Women Lakewood Re ister Jewish Consumptives' 6401 W. Colfax Ave., 5JF178 1927 National Relief Power House. Lakewood Register Jewish Consumptives' 650 17th St., Denver 5DV1729 1927 Demolished Relief Security Build in St. Lukes Hospital Boise, Idaho 1928 Lawrence C. Phipps 3400 Belcaro Dr., 5DV168 1932 National House Denver Register Jewish Consumptives' 6401 W. Colfax Ave., 5JF178 1936 National Relief Society Lakewood Register TriBoro Dining Hall Arthur A. Fisher and Alan B. Fisher, Architects (1937-1956) New Railway Exchange 909 17th St., Denver 5DV525 1937 National Building Register Colorado State Capitol 1341 Sherman St., 5DV3844 1939 National Annex Building & Boiler Denver Register Plant (Associated Architects for the State Capitol Annex; Arthur A. Fisher member Country Club Gardens E. Ellsworth & S. 1940 Apartments Downing, Denver Denver Public Library 10 W. 14 Ave. Pkwy., 5DV3520 1955 National (with Burnham Hoyt) Denver Register Fisher, Fisher and Davis (1956-1959) Colorado Department of 251 E. 12th Ave., 5DV4147 1956 Employment Denver Undated Buildings International Trust Denver Demolished Company Building University of Denver Denver Demolished Stadium Greenlee Elementary 1150 Lipan, Denver School Chester Morey House Denver John Evans House Denver George B. Berger House Denver Harold Kountze House Denver A.C. Foster House Denver George W. Gano House Denver M William B. Berger House Denver Jarvis Johnson House 4150 Montview, Denver Hospital Casper, WY Hospital Sheridan, WY COLORADO ARCHITECTS BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Hospital Cheyenne, WY Hospital Thermopolis, WY Hospital Pueblo Hospital Colorado Springs Hospital Greele Hos ital Twin Falls, ID Katherine Mullen O'Connor House Denver Donald N. Gilpin House Broadmoor vicinity, Colorado S rin s Church of the Ascension Denver Information Sources Site Files Database, Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Colorado Historical Society, Denver. Student, Annette L., Historic Cheesman Park Neighborhood. Denver: Historic Denver Inc., 1999. Wilk, Diane. The Wyman Historic District. Denver: Historic Denver Inc., 1995. Revised: July 11, 2000 Case No.: App: Last. Name: App: First Name: Owner: Last Name: Owner: First Name: App Address: City, State Zip: App:Phone: Owner Address: City/State/Zip: Owner Phone: Project Address: Street Name: City/State, Zip: ase Disposition: Project Planner: 4=ile Location: Notes: Follow-Up: HL0507 _ Quarter Section Map No.: E26 I R-Historric~al `Society Related Cases: /o Claudia Worth Case History: Historic Landmark - Designation for George Olinger House . . 6509ak3t. Review Body: heat Ridge, CO 03-467.0023_,_ APN: 9-264-06-001_... 2nd Review Body: CC 2nd Review Date: . _ ._J. 77 Decision-making Body: r_ _ 495 Approval/Denial Date: est 29th Avenue _ heatRidge,Q0800333 Reso/Ordinance No.: ; I Conditions of P rval: District: Reckert ctive i Date Received: 77/4/2005 - Pre-App Date: