HomeMy WebLinkAboutWA-02-127500 West 29th Avenue
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033
The City of
Wheat
Telephone 303/235-284
FAX 303/235-2857
December 20, 2002
Christopher Murray
3739 Chase St.
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Dear Mr. Murray:
RE: Case No. WA-02-12
Ridge
Please be advised that at its meeting of December 4, 2002, the Board of Adjustment APPROVED
your request for a 39" fence height variance to the 6' maximum height allowed resulting in a 99" high
fence on property zoned Residential and located at 3739 Chase Street.
Enclosed is a copy of the Certificate of Resolution stating the Board's decision which became
effective the date of the meeting, December 4, 2002. This variance shall automatically expire within
one hundred eighty (180) days of the date it was granted, June 2, 2003.
Please feel free to contact me at (303) 235-2846 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Kathy eld
Administrative Assistant
Enclosures: Certificate of Resolution
Draft of Minutes
cc: WA-02-12 (case file)
Building File
C:\Documents and Settings\kathyi\My Documenta\Kadiy\HOA\CORRESP\2002\wa0212approval.wpd
CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTION
I, Ann Lazzeri, Secretary to the City of Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment, do hereby certify that
the following Resolution was duly adopted in the City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson,
State of Colorado on the 4th day of December, 2002.
CASE NO. WA-02-12
APPLICANT'S NAME: Christopher Murray
LOCATION: 3739 Chase Street
Upon a motion by Board Member ABBOTT and second by Board Member BLAIR, the
following resolution was stated:
WHEREAS, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and
WHEREAS, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-02-12 is an appeal to this Board
from the decision of an administrative officer; and
WHEREAS, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law; and there were no
protests registered against the application; and
WHEREAS, the relief applied for MAY be granted without detriment to the public welfare and
without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing the City of
Wheat Ridge.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Board of Adjustment Application Case No.
WA-02-12 be, and hereby is, APPROVED.
TYPE OF VARIANCE: Request for approval of a 3-foot 9-inch fence height variance to the 6-
foot maximum height allowed resulting in a 9-foot 9-inch high fence on property zoned
Residential 1B.
FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
The physical surroundings and topographical conditions of the area have created a
hardship in that the apartment structure adjacent to this property, and sharing this
property line, sits with only a 6-foot setback from this affected property line thereby not
offering 3739 Chase the normal relief provided by normal setbacks. The apartment
structure adjacent to this property and sharing this property line sits on a lot elevated
considerably from 3739 Chase.
2. The request would not alter the essential character of the locality. Neighbors sharing this
property line on both sides of 3739 Chase have screening affected by vegetation, garages,
etc.
Board of Adjustment
Resolution WA-02-12
Page two (2)
3. The allowed fence would be wood with metal posts and would extend 6-feet above the
current concrete wall providing the allowed 6-foot fence along a rear property line.
VOTE: YES: ABBOTT, BLAIR, DRDA, ECHELMEYER, HOVLAND,
HOWARD, MONTOYA, YOUNG
NO: None
DISPOSITION: Request for approval of a 3-foot 9-inch fence height variance to the 6-foot
maximum height allowed resulting in a 9-foot 9-inch high fence on property zoned Residential
1B was APPROVED.
ADOPTED and made effective this 4th day of DECEMBER, 2002.
NTOY , Ch irman
o stment
Ann Lazzeri, Secretar
Board of Adjustment
It was moved by Board Member HOVLAND and seconded by Board Member
DRDA to continue Case No. TUP-02-05 to the January 23, 2003 meeting because the
applicant failed to meet the deadline for posting. If requirements are not met at the
January 23~d meeting, the case will be dismissed. The motion passed 8-0.
B. Case No. WA-02-12: An application filed by Christopher Murray for approval of
a 3-foot 9-inch fence height variance to the 6-foot maximum height allowed
resulting in a 9-foot 9-inch high fence on property zoned Residential One B (R-
1B) and located at 3739 Chase Street.
The case was presented by Mike Pesicka. He reviewed the staff report and entered all
pertinent documents into the record. A digital presentation was given. Staff
recommended approval of the application for reasons outlined in the staff report.
Christopher Murray
3739 Chase Street
Mr. Murray, the applicant, was sworn in by Chair MONTOYA. He explained that, if
granted the variance, he plans to build a wooden fence in front of an existing concrete
wall which varies in height. The purpose of the fence would be to provide privacy to his
back yard which faces the back of an apartment building. He stated he plans to use metal
poles to support a fence. The proposed fence would extend six-feet in height from the
top of the concrete wall of the adjacent apartment building.
Board member ECHELMEYER noted that this request would be in keeping with the rest
of the neighbors who have used different means such as garages and tall fences to screen
their property from the apartment complex.
Upon a motion by Board Member ABBOTT and second by Board Member BLAIR,
the following resolution was stated:
Whereas, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and
Whereas, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-02-12 is an appeal to this
Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and
Whereas, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law; and in
recognition that there were no protests registered against it;
Whereas, the relief applied for MAY be granted without detriment to the public
welfare and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the
regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge.
Now, therefore, be it resolved that Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-
02-12 be, and hereby is, APPROVED.
Board of Adjustment Page 2
12/04/02
Type of Variance: Request for approval of a 3-foot 9-inch fence height variance to
the 6-foot maximum height allowed resulting in a 9-foot 9-inch high fence on
property zoned Residential 113.
For the following reasons:
The physical surroundings and topographical conditions of the area have
created a hardship in that the apartment structure adjacent to this property,
and sharing this property line, sits with only a 6-foot setback from this
affected property line thereby not offering 3739 Chase the normal relief
provided by normal setbacks. The apartment structure adjacent to this
property and sharing this property line sits on a lot elevated considerably
from 3739 Chase.
2. The request would not alter the essential character of the locality. Neighbors
sharing this property line on both sides of 3739 Chase have screening
affected by vegetation, garages, etc.
3. The allowed fence would be wood with metal posts and would extend 6-feet.
above the current concrete wall providing the allowed 6-foot fence along a
rear property line.
The motion passed 8-0.
C. Case No. WA-02-14: An application filed by Burger King for (A) approval of a
6-foot setback variance from the required 10-foot setback for a freestanding sign,
resulting in a 4-foot setback; (B) a request for a 2-foot setback variance from the
required 5-foot setback for a second freestanding sign resulting in a 3-foot
setback; and (C) a request for a 9-foot sign height variance from the maximum
allowable 15-foot sign height resulting in a 24-foot high sign for property zoned
Commercial One (C-1) and located at 3800 Wadsworth Boulevard.
The case was presented by Travis Crane. He reviewed the staff report and entered all
pertinent documents into the record. A digital presentation was given. Staff
recommended approval of the application for reasons outlined in the staff report. Since
the request is located in the urban renewal area, it was reviewed by the Wheat Ridge
Urban Renewal Authority. Mr. Crane distributed copies of the review made by the
Authority which found that the application should have negligible impact on the urban
renewal area. Staff recommended approval of all three variance requests for reasons
outlined in the staff report.
Concern was expressed by members of the Board about the necessity to remove trees
when the sign is moved. Travis Crane reminded the Board that the applicant would still
Board of Adjustment Page 3
12/04/02
O
CC
~
CD
~
o
~
~
o
N
~
O
O
Owe
weew
O.We
S
UG
81,
0
mew 0
n
O
A:
O
w
0
0
rot-
fD
O
N
N
~z
fD
UA
OEW •
*NEW
w
I'+
i
I
n a a
a
/ R
rrm of ~
V
,
di
Y
/ iT
h
Nyl
N
.l
N
0
,x.
f~
3
n
C
s
J
c~
n
P
i
1
n
R
7n
rv
K
Iwo
0
0
~a
0
vs'
CfQ
0
0
N
hr
o
o
0
`ol
.
o
r
A'
Q
n
zrw
ow
n
F\
03
0
roll
0
0
0
Ow
?I
d
n
Mot
a
ara
z
n
0
n
w
UA =w
Moo.
n
O-W
n roll
O ~
*do
MoW.
Ooood
O
MoWs
n
0
N
HoW
rot-
01
O.We
O
*.We
n
y
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT
TO: Board of Adjustment
DATE OF MEETING: December 4, 2002 DATE PREPARED: November 25, 2002
CASE NO. & NAME: WA-02-12/1\4urray
CASE MANAGER: Michael Pesicka
ACTION REQUESTED: Request for approval of a 3 foot 9 inch fence height variance to the 6 foot
maximum height allowed resulting in a 9 foot 9 inch high fence on
property zoned Residential-One B (R-1B).
LOCATION OF REQUEST: 3739 Chase Street
NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT (S): Christopher Murray
3739 Chase Street
= Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER (S): Same as above
APPOXIMATE AREA: 10,890 square feet (.25 Acres)
PRESENT ZONING:
Residential-One B (R-1B)
PRESENT LAND USE:
Single Family Residence
SURROUNDING ZONING:
N, S, & E, R-1B; W, PRD
SURROUNDING LAND USE:
N, S, & E, Single Family; W, Multi-Family Residential
DATE PUBLISHED:
November 14, 2002
DATE POSTED:
November 20, 2002
DATE LEGAL NOTICES SENT: November 14, 2002
ENTER INTO THE RECORD:
(X)
CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS
(X)
ZONING ORDINANCE
O
SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS
(X)
EXHIBITS
(X)
OTHER
Board of Adjustment 1
Case no./Name
JURISDICTION:
The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and'pbsting requirements have been
met, therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case.
L REQUEST
The property in question is located at 3739 Chase Street, and is currently a single-family residence. The
property is zoned Residential-One B (R-1B). (Exhibit 1, Zoning Map).
The applicant (owner), Christopher Murray (Exhibit 2, Deed), is requesting approval of a 3 foot9 inch
fence height variance to the 6' maximum (Exhibit 3 Application). Pursuant to Section 26-603A
"Generally, no divisional fence, wall or hedge above the height of forty-eight (48) inches shall be
permitted within a minimum. required front yard, or above the height of six (6) feet in instances not
otherwise specified. Applicant is proposing a 7.5-foot high fence post on the south end of the fence and
a 10.5-foot high fence post on the north end (Exhibit 4, Applicant Letter). Pursuant to Section 26-603C
"Support columns, poles or posts shall be permitted to be constructed up to one (1) foot higher than the
permitted fence heights".
II. SITE PLAN
The applicant has submitted asite plan showing the location for the proposed fence (Rxhib*&j
Site Plan). At approximately. 10,890 square feet the property exceeds the minimum lot area,
requirement for a single-family home in the R-113 zone district. The property has lot frontage of
75 feet, which exceeds the minimum lot width requirement for a single-family home in the R-1B
zone district.
III. VARIANCE CRITERIA
Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a variance request:
1. Can the property in question yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if
permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in
which it is located?
If the requests are denied, the property may still receive a reasonable return in use. The
property is currently utilized as a single-family residence, and this use may continue.
2. If the variance were granted, would it alter the essential character of the locality?
The variance would most likely not alter the essential character of the locality. The property
that abuts the rear yard has a concrete pad that is raised approximately 2 to 4 feet above
grade, and a four-foot chain link fence rests on top of the concrete pad. Applicant is
requesting that his rear fence match the height of the concrete pad and chain link fence. The
proposed fence would not alter the character of the locality since it will only match what
already exists on an adjacent property.
Board of Adjustment 2
Case no./Name
3. Does the particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the
specific property" involved result in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner)
as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were
carried out?
The lot does not have a unique shape, and is rectangular in shape. At approximately 10,890
square feet, the lot exceeds the minimum lot size requirement in the R-113 zone district.
The property does slope from south to north. This has created a need for the fence to
increase in height moving from south to north so it will be level.
4. Has the alleged difficulty or hardship been created by any person presently having an
interest in the property?
The applicant has not created a self-imposed hardship. The existing concrete pad and fence -
that abut the applicant's rear yard have created a unique condition; the entire property has
been built above the natural existing grade of the area. The applicant's house was built in
1952 and has remained unchanged. The apartment complex to the west was built in 1985,
and on a higher grade than the surrounding area. The result is the apartment complex sits
three to four feet above the applicant's property. The rear yard setback for the apartment
building is approximately 9 feet off of the property line.
5. Would the granting of the variance be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located,
by, among other things, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent
property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing the
danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or substantially diminishing or
impairing property values within the neighborhood?
The requests would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other properties
in the area. The adequate supply of light and air would not be compromised as a result of
these requests. The requests would not increase congestion in the streets, nor increase the
danger of fire. The requests would most likely not have an effect on property values in the
neighborhood.
6. If criteria 1 through 5 are found, then, would the granting of the variance result in a
benefit or contribution to the neighborhood or the community, as distinguished from
an individual benefit on the part of the applicant, or would granting of the variance
result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities?
The requests would not result in a contribution or benefit to the neighborhood, and would
merely be a convenience for the property owners. The requests would not result in a
reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities.
Board of Adjustment
Case no./Name
IV. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Upon review of the above requests, staff concludes that the above criteria are supportive of the
variance requests. Staff has found that there are unique circumstances attributed to these requests
that would warrant approval of a variance. Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL for the
following reasons:
1. The physical surrounding and topographical conditions of the area have
created hardship.
2. Request would not alter the essential character of the locality..
3. Request would not be detrimental to the public welfare.
With the following conditions:
1 Limit the fence to `a maximum height of 9 feet 9 inches.
2. A chain link fence will not be permitted.
Board of Adjustment 4
Case no./Name
EXH! B
1''r
i
S,k~
o~a~;or
5E 24
.J l m MI al al al $I al
l Gl t
$I $I $I
-1 L 1 $1
RI $1 %
x a
$
FK D L.
o
C-1
$
R
~17 17a
W3THP
R-
LUEBKE PR
n A
$ $ p 3]
'
APT5
b 3P0
N
Q
G
n3o
✓ LL$ 37ss
m N
Wz71-n
as 3](5
$
3
3]
]is 30 3]b
R.
3T30
R R F-
F
-
3Tdl S 3]13
n 3]W _a R R n 3N3
3]•q
°n
R-1 C-
3715 3m
3315 - 3710
e
=n n
W
.
W3'lM AVE
3590
31W
Z
=
'
m
fi
N `s
3=
z.
R-2] _111
W ' E1PANORAMA a0
0 M D R3 PARK J R-3
Sam
F wo g ao
R R
U R-1
~ - RI ~P ~J a1°
n n A S 6 ,Na 0 33W
L45 ~
3,35 x
338.5 a49
331] aa6
33ts ~ aa°
339 ~ R
3311 a9
af0
3169 3 `W
tj 9G60
aeB
33W
33m
a10
Sa01 aC4
S N
a]s
as ~ m ~
w
ass
33as ~ i
N-C
19 ~•J N
NIS n
3395 W2aa20
L
W
a -3' W
9233
n
3as
J
3335
I
.0
3Ma
33° 5
p
aA8
N
@
Ti
:
E
393
>LSS
329
3m1
C
R-1
C
U' =
m
a
R
31
c
r
3a0 3215
3L5
3359
333,
an
m
A
r,1
3a3
I I
q
Ld
{
3ra 3zz1
a5
3215
390
390
3a,
39,
CUP-9d-1
R-3
a1s
~
-
B3
3213 3319
33tt
3z,B
3219
R-CR
1 11 1 G I ~1 1 ~I_
__1 F XI rI~ 31~ ~
3t~1~
310.5
5E 25
OFFICIAL
ZONING MAP
A
NE
25
D
SIIGINATES OWNERSHIP)
WHEAT 1 RIDGE
-WATER FEATURE
COLORADO
DENOTES MULTIPLE ADDRESSES
100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN
0 i00 2co
3co 400 P-
(APPROXIMATE LOCATION)
J W
'
0.°°
DEPARTMENTOF
`O3° - PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
MAP ADOPTED: June 15, 1994
I asf Rrxvicinn Aanf-h- In 9nn1
N
10
-V
min
Wr
U
Z
loU
m z
O
U)
w
.0 LL
W
ti
It z
v
LL W
z0
ox
a
W
U ti
W ti
XN
W
A
q
N
8
+l
A
m
E
V
of
N
ro
O
h
W
O
W
.4
it
9
W
W
Q
rn
H
F
q
ro
H
O
q
ro
H
LT
.4 44
W O
7 1
h O
U
;l
41
W
O
zl.J
W
a
W
W
H
W
0
04
0
0
+J
W
O
p
r
N
O
m
O
O
U
LW'J
Q
H 0
ai
E W
W IC
3 b1
H Q
W
r,
a
O
E a
m o
U
M W
O
t
U Gl
41
I Ul
M
a) q
-,1
ro
W Z
N N
W
'O W
ro W
W
H-I h
ro
OI 0 44
a) 4J f7Y
~ 0
O ~l
A O
8U
C m A -fGi
da
LL N r C
.i y N W
U N N A
d M Y 'O
H d C
H N
d 4~ rn
Y d -HGf
N Y T
aA+ °
W
W T Y
A M 0
~ U1 'J
N O -Y.I
N
g b O N
xi
o 'O T
o W rn
o C 0 -wHl
fa U N
.y 'O Y
W e C
1 v m aF!
0
o H+ >
E ron ti H
y -.f W
m b E
d 3
d -.I -.i Y .-04
F d W -H .-4
Y} 310
ftl M
O A w .WG m
OI Y
C b d. d 'O
O W y rn W
-N Y O A
0
Y C W Y .-I
W H H
W H
H rn U
d m T O
O F H b
O F 000
U Y H 'O
G N 0 CL w
'O E m N
b W H W O
"00w
O x U Y 0
Ni U W
0 b H G
N M 0
H T W N Y
Y T w
G H W T'O
0 W> U G
rn W U G z
d -.f W O
Y H-I Y N.
~d H Y W
Y- W G w
O F 0 -N w
3 O
o -Gi G hya
y 0 -HI o
F ~wpf y y
pm] W .q A G
Z U G O
M IH p O V
EE
3 Wj' {W,I O tW.
m ooY
7
H
fj1 • ~~j•
E•I W
E
Fa
'DZ G W H
pa 0
W O E W W
O U 00
W Y
x~w
H O
•~~1 ~I
O a ~-I
U w E O H
W E W O
N tHO RW a
7 W
IC' W U W
W 7i x'
xi x O W E
H E N w
a d• E O
'z.. O •ia
H
H
W H✓ E W
E W 7l W W
W
W W N
O m U m l~
10 r~
H W 1!1 x
N W 1~f E
W U' H ri M
2c 0
N 7.f
H WWW O~ N
W !9L!~y W W
W r•1•i W T-I
°°00Zx
t` m U W E
O1 x
m m W E E
O W
E a W
•Zf H W W 7i
H 'm p U O
W z Nry~+ F H y. LO~
$ N IZa w W QI
~1 O Icy V W Q•i
H H H W O
H 'd. U W a
4 ~ O W H 17 O
C9 N Pi W 04 W U
7-I W W W O W
H ,41 W 0 O
~~yy O W W~4
~.f H W E+ U E+ W
H E h z z p
U U H W
4
W W ..f.. O..4 0 H
IA VIn O-PI H U VI
_
n
N
Hi
N
O
m
O
Q~j
0
a
U
W
U
H
ai
H
W
W
E
W
W
LL
H
N
W
CO
x
Ol
M
t`
(h
ro
N
O
•U
Ci
ro
4'1
Ul
N
yl
0
A
0
of
X
O
N
ro
rn d
C O)
>
C m A
_
fp y d
Y d
N Yd^
W d Y
N Y O
y
d rl 'O
-.i N N
C
c v -H
O N
c 5H
-.i o
x+
H O
O d T
H Y
d -HI
+F+r
q Y H
o -.i o
W 0 3
A H 0
O a~
Y 'O G
G G -H
w c W
d a .c
A C Y
y m W
U H
N Y Y
G G c
d d d
H H rn
O. .n W
GL H A
0 W y
T!
b C W
C -N O
IE ~~pp
E H
rn NN d
C H N
E G vl
Ytl 0 fytl
.i H F
w G 'O
d -.i G
F
WC •i
y .'O
H G
0 G 0
O
ryi
Of fn -HEI
G H 0
-N d .-f
W U
G H N
0 'O
H+ c w
d
0 G Y
O G
.IF.a C C
-r H
S W N
> H,
Hai W Y
.'✓C H Y
H W
w t
{9 Y Y
O F
H'O Of
m"w
'O W . Hi 'O Ma
.i m F Y y G 0 C]
m b y a i d .H2
W
N-I H .--I d G S
d O d d O W
Y 7 w'O IM y~.f ffi
-•i d C U W
O tyE -Ei d d d H
y y y H H N pp~~
7 W m W d d m N
d F O Ed H R
N Gy y O a Itl r 0.
W W o m m a
G H 0 rn ti d ul [4
N .-I N F d O
c m f0 xi Y U
d c Y A c w
Y O d Y N P
H vl t ftl M q
H Y'O Y F
d W F Y H
m a>'i -of
W 0 a o" m w
A -HI W o , s
y H 0 W rn -d Y E
-'I 0> m C P
Y F A fE d E m
-.i 'CI f0 t H N .2
3 x c O W w
.C i° N m m .H-i
'o -.i E m ~C
d Iw H E H
A W W H Hi Ni N
U E A a r %
m W.. c d if
t-
'O aY N N Y H
w A d H ..2
O Y N-I d d N
fn G IH ` O N-I ~a a ~>ff
U 0 H m d -HGi E .~i U z
r O W N R
U b y Y -.i C ~~yy
G W C G W 3 -•i m PG w
W C 0 0 m 0 W H H
Y -•i m H rl W .-4
H N E OG
Of Of , 0
O rn N C ftl 0 O q
W H d d W -.i d W OG
b A Y Y 3 W d (a m] ~x O]
'O 'cO F '.'I U Y N iG {L
0> IC -Hf W 0 T rn fHG W
O 3 F Y W H O
G N G h W O A W 4
W •n 0 Y .m U 3
m H o w -HI v i~ w ~ I.
-'Yi 5W y 0l 0 op OI
W H m W Of 0 .-i Of W H
H W G H W r-I 5
W rn rn W Y y H U•
A" -H W ftl W H H
fU N 'O F Y > W>
F W m G Y W G W
O
Y 0 -.i. h
'r 'G G _G o m a
„ Y 0 0 T A 0 0 H H
3 m H A H 0 2
. o -Hm m> m. e m 0.z'
5 W A- x Y H G
H F .-i W G O
O . W 'O 0 lu m O
F H -.Hi G -HGi U Hi o U
fu pp d 0 '0 Hi 'O
H z F H G '0 O 0 G U]
a ~~CC y m 0 G Y -Hi z
H~~] N E x o
N '.Y N Y q W aT+ H H F
r d C -'I Y 'I 1H d U
-'I d N .-i 'J H > H
N Y C N .--1 O H d (L
rn 0 G d W O F 0 Y F
H H ftl > d Y W W (O
A o001 m I
d W T
N t C
m Y m
U Of Ni
ftl C{ O
a E
-r1 d
'O ti
G U
0 F
Y rl y
7 C
a W
0
rl H
d N
F .-I
Y '.J
G Of
O G
C 0 -Hi
-HI H m
0 LW'
m o
EEC C N
N O H
W M .-'4
d W
CL
c l>if aF+
-.i d
0>
H W 0
A C 7
1 0 .-I
> rl a
O rl d
A N F
N y Y
.G G 'WO
u -.i C
.i
0
p 0 U
z d G
W
W w rl
q C .-I
tea]' t
WV •O N
tG 0
w
O 'O
pWqz p a m
R 0 d
-.Hi m e
R
H F 'J m
H G H-f
WWW -.i -N .-i
0. d 0
$ F
.-I y F Y
. H
-I 1 d
w o A
a G H U
0 0 W -H
rn Y w
H L
0 d Y 0
F F H
] Y W A
li w
O O T Hi
Y c r-I
r G N N
H H 0
Of N O
N H
W d W d
N .--1 'O
E N O G
wa rn
!
333 AVY1N3wfmQ 31VE
N
s ~
U q
O O
N
N V
Q Lu
C) CO
i
O
Hi
O
0
N
N
W
O
vi
w
-w
d
O
-Hi
m
EN„
O
E
ti
d
N
ti
W
-HI
U
..i
Ni
NJ
0
S
m
G
s
e
N
m
G
3
fC
N
W
w
q
U
m
N
N
M
w
9
d
C
d
r
n°
O
W
W
q
3
m
M
FWHEgT LAND UCASE PROCESSING APP CATION oe WHE4T
V n U O
t CoLORPO PO tX2ff - COn {ootoRna Pm
(Please print or type all information)
Applicant 4WAI9/'O l y Address 3939 ~i'/tAS E 1J" -r - Phone 3D3-+5z 07~
City. LJHEAr RIt (oe~- State /So zip Sella Fax
Owner Address Phone
City State Zip Fax
Contact Address Phone
City State Zip Fax
(The person listed as contact will be contacted to answer questions regarding this application, provide additional information when necessary, post
public hearing signs, and will receive a copy of the staff report prior to Public Hearing.)
Location of request (address): 373`1 C ~i95C 1i> U~H~AY QiJ)Gc ~o 9'0a ho
Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request.)
Application submittal requirements on reverse side
❑ Change of zone or zone conditions ❑ Special Use Permit
❑ Consolidation Plat ❑ Subdivision: Minor (5 lots or less)
❑ Flood Plain Special Exception ❑ Subdivision: Major (More than 5 lots)
❑ Interpretation of Code ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Right of Way Vacation
❑ Planned Building Group ❑ Temporary Use, Building, Sign
❑ Site Development Plan approval )i Variance/Waiver (from Section )
❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment ❑ Other:
Detailed description of request: l3otldtN5, A A*Aje-e 6.J ThG t:JeST ~E5Nn o-I A6o46
'SA10 20062 74 A t442/AAM@ `02 ThF A oj41t7 0-1C SAr~j )5A C6E
Required information:
Assessors Parcel Number: Size of Lot (acres or square footage):
Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning:
Current Use: Proposed Use:
I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this
application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above, without whose consent the requested action
cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners must submit power-of-attorney from the owner which approved of
this action on his behalf.
Signature ofA LM zL~
ubs ibe sworn to me this day of ®GfefiE _ 200.9-.
` Note y u lic
N9:;oVg`~Ga Qo
My commission expires
r• t
Date received Fee ecei No. ✓5 P Case No.
Comp Plan Desig. Zoning J<- r Quarter Section Map IV~a 5
Z~~
Related Case No. Pre-App Mtg. Date Case Manager 'Pei'
EXHIBIT 4
lh,s ,b A App/reAriond 1441z A J~t~eiat~iCu
o..j
-?.e
AEl& Plf ~ntc~
oeJ uessr" .
6OAj
~
?oeopee7y fit
40Q?'10
e~T/~ T In
7'0
c t'e'al Cr AT .
~c
-7 op
oll' 7`A COA)C6T';' RE7 ,nl,nJ 9 U/~ll.
~U1eeE~~/n/ % ~t~ c?RovsJ~, T~E hC-e~~r7' t~ -
I M~ f /i2S7° ~o sTf o,~e - boa A t ooo l el
,6° Io /Z F~,5r. 7-A6-,
a/cJ zS ira.~~c ova- v &L)oaj..
d~ENCC
~B~ w®vld ~ct~ Thy ~ree~/>9c~ o r Yh~
/~c=Sdi~E S o~ ThE ~t~o% SRd p2dp~vz /
1Fi o--roQE = S a-F Trit. W 65-r 6A) D o-F The
f 2opckry q t 3?39 aq,16 .
-~G'f~v~=L ~a = 1:5 0- ahG ' ~d~~RT•tr Cau++~G~ Ej1P
f e
-PaaAalC Lv,!5 6K -
(Th6 bprak o-F LoaE kj5 mgnJ®2 .
v.SfhCI-i I7R5 A S1X ~OT ~GNr
d nY To~ Th 6 ,Q~sFa,~e 1 Al
Cj
W.vl
EXHIBIT n
Geis ~tw~a ~~lu y 3-739 C4Ase S-raE~F--r. Ljoepn- x, 61OLO. Somz
=zo
-7S
ILO
Cf-EAS~, .STrz~,T'
~s ~r
z
~
~
o
~
_ _ _
o
~
o _
~
oo
i
~O
~w
_
_ _
_
__Z..--,j
e
y
_o
k~-~ 'I
.
z j
11 _
_ _
_
.
Ul
_
e
A
_ ~
<
m
a
n";
E
I
I
_
~
~ [
6
S
f
.
_
_
_
z
x
n
~
g
i
II
a-
Q _
~
a
v
~
3
I
r L
~
i
t
i.
I
i
d
v
w~
N
W
`
d
N
C
'U
y
a
~
~
O
v
K
a
Q
y
c
U
m
U
u
d
a
K
o
R
c
2
:
.
NI
O
~
C
7
Sa
o
N
u. C N
N
a! E o
a
L
O R
n 0 C
N
:JO
it
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
r O =
~wa
d
R
u
t:
15
O
•c~
O
O.
N
N
T
N
N
N
N
T N
G
9
N
N N
R N
~
N
~ N
N
N
t~6 N
V~
O
R
~i OJ
o in
R OJ
E in
LL (O
in
O
N in o
R of
m m
)
m M
. N
X N
❑ in o
N OJ
"o
N
2 N
v
N
NO
NO
NO
c;~
cN0
`
NO
p
=RO
m0
G I
41
~2 N U
= N U
-N N U
❑ O U
m fN6 U
U
J 0
O
A U
V
Y
(n
•0
L
L N
~ U O)
L N
m U O i
I L N
p U
m
d R U
C}
L N
Q U rn
'C N
J U m
-E
L
U
C L N
w o O I
L N
L U D
N
a
Rov
'
mo°
'
o_
°
N~ m
o~
'
N
aoO
in m
o
No:o
S
nm.~
V N
y
~(O d
M
E V d
M
Nro!
M
dN ~
. C]d
.w
R K
M
L V )
~ M
L NO
m
O[7~
~ M
-O n D-
N
D.
E
N
~
N
N 0 2.'
CL
R
U
N
N
U
`
VJ Q
'a.
❑
U
a1 'O W L
O
N j
3
C N a) of
Q u. c N N
r
~a
O
~
a) 00
CC ~U ci~LLW
E
a
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑
R
z
N
M
v
~n
m
r
m
to
~
n
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
j~
~
~
~
~
ro
N
W
W
W
i
W
<
'
°
e~ O
~
V O
O
v
v
c
v
v
v
v
v
v
00
Obi
m
m
m
Obi
Obi
A
m
a
m
m
m
°rn
m
°rn
rn
m
°m
O
2
o
o
o
m
m
m
t
o
t
o
m
~
~
c
o
w Q W p
n
n
n
n
n
r
N
0
Q ?
a
W
O
z
U LO a
a
v
T
d
U
C
N
E
U
P
~
~
v
V
a
'm
u
u
`
a
K
o
R
~
c
Z
~
NI
N
p
W
d
`
\
`N'
~
C
J
~
a
9
\
v
j O
N
N p' p
N ~ y
N
0
N w U
-
L
p
wo
O p C
£ N O
R
#
N
N
N
N O D-
d
N
N
N
N R N
U
Q
Q
Q
Q
u
0
O
lQ
o
d
N
N
°
~
V
c
N
N
~ m
W
O
R
o
L 07
o
r.: W
m
>.y
°
N
d
m
mU
coo
Na
w
~
y
m
~
NU
> 16
cNU
=t
i
F00
a+
v
U m
a
p U m
'o c
d
v
Q
t u>:4
~~p :4
mo
va
d
M~
~M~
w~o
-
L
L
C7
UI ~ N L~
~
~
~
O
C N N m~ p N
Q
o
E N N
O U C u LLJ
£
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑
z
O
m
m
N
m
m
Cl)
.2
0
0
0
Cl)
o
m
m
LLI
O
Q
°v
°v
°v
O
p
0 00
s
m
m
O
£
0
m
0
m
0
m
U
F- 9
QQ W z0
r
n
n
w Fn
O >
N
0 3: Q
Q ?
d
z
~ =
c
W) J
Un~
~I
i a
0
N
T
0
E
E
Lil
nn
c
Ce
O
E
R
z
d
N
O
a
Q.
n
N
N
W
w
O
E
~ U
~r O
v
a
d
T
U
N
J
U
fL
0
E
z'
F
7500 West 29th Avenue
The City of
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Wheat Ridge
Telephone 303/235-2846
FAX 303/235-2857
November 20, 2002
Dear Property Owner:
This is to inform you of Case No. WA-02-12 which is a request for approval of a 3'9" fence
height variance to the 6' maximum height allowed resulting in a 9'9" high fence on property
zoned Residential-One B (R-IB) and located at 3739 Chase Street. This case will heard by the
Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex at
7500 West 29th Avenue on December 4, 2002, at 6:30 p.m.
As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit
written comments.
If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at 303-
235-2846. Thank you.
Planning Division.
C:\DocumenB and Settings\kathyAMy Documents\ Cathy\BOA\pubnotice\2002\wa02l2.wpd
-
~
3
g~
.~.v
1A
*
*
- MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
/
Owner
:Morr
ow Paula J
Parcel
:021512
Site
:3765
Chase St Wheat Ridge 80212
Xfered
:04/04/2002
Mail
:3765
Chase St Wheat Ridge Cc 80212
Price
:$194,000 Full
Use
:1112
Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
4
Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1956 Pool:
B1dgSF
:1,020 Ac:.
14
MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Hatmaker Sammie B
Parcel
:021545
Site
:3740
Chase St Wheat Ridge 80212
Xfered
:10/25/2001
Mail
:3740
Chase St Wheat Ridge Cc 80212
Price
:$169,500 Full
Use
:1112
Res,Improved Land
Phone
:303-980-1478
Bedrm:
Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1951 Pool:
B1dgSF
:920 Ac:
*
MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Paul
A & Margaret D Diederich Family Trs
Parcel
:021771
-
Site
:3770
Chase St Wheat Ridge 80212
Xfered
:07/24/1995
Mail
:3770
Chase St Wheat Ridge Cc 80212
Price
L.
Use
:1112
Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
Bath:1.00 TOtRm:. YB:1951 Pool:
BidgSF
:1,256 Ac:
*
; MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Onstott Stephen P
Parcel
:021952
Site
:5700
W 38Th Ave Wheat Ridge 80212
Xfered
:03/03/1998
Mail
:6228
Yarrow St Arvada Cc 80004
Price
:$260,000 Full
Use
:1112
Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
2
Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1923 Pool:
BidgSF
:992 Ac:.
72
*
: MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Bang
as Peter A
Parcel
:022172
Site
:3730
Chase St Wheat Ridge 80212
Xfered
:04/01/1996
Mail
:3730
Chase St Wheat Ridge Cc 80212
Price
:$107,500 Full
Use
:1112
Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1951 Pool:
B1dgSF
:1,114 Ac:.
18
*
: MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Rodr
iguez Richard L
Parcel
:022228
Site
:3710
Chase St Wheat Ridge 80212
Xfered
:03/10/1986
Mail
:3710
Chase St Wheat Ridge Cc 80212
Price
:$68,000
Use
:1112
Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1951 Pool:
B1dgSF
:1,296 Ac:
MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Lix
Thomas L
Parcel
:022241
Site
:3745
Chase St Denver 80212
Xfered
:08/18/1998
Mail
:3745
Chase St Denver Cc 80212
Price
:$135,950 Full
Use
:1112
Res,Improved Land
Phone
:303-456-5370
Bedrm:
2
Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1952 Pool:
B1dgSF
:905 Ac:.
18
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Hors
Kathleen J
Parcel
:022271
Site
:3720
Chase St Wheat Ridge 80212
Xfered
:05/26/1999
Mail
:3720
Chase St Wheat Ridge Cc 80212
Price
:$137,000
Use
:1112
Res,Improved Land
Phone
:303-432-0404
Bedrm:
2
Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1951 Pool:
B1dgSF
:1,084 Ac:
MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
*
Owner
:Murray Christopher M
Parcel
:022328
Site
:3739
Chase St Wheat Ridge 80212
Xfered
:07/02/1998
Mail
:3739
Chase St Wheat Ridge Cc 80212
Price
:$126,000 Full
Use
:1112
Res,Improved Land
Phone
:303-873-1700
Bedrm:
2
Bath:1,50 TotRm: YB:1952 Pool:
BidgSF
:1,172 Ac:.
25
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Veitch John R
Parcel
:022832
Site
:3715
Chase St Wheat Ridge 80212
Xfered
Mail
:3715
Chase St Wheat Ridge Cc 80212
Price
Use
:1112
Res,Improved Land
Phone
:303-422-1362
Bedrm:
Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1956 Pool:
B1dgSF
:2,106 Ac:.
25
Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations
or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report.
*-----------------------MetroScan / Jefferson (CO)
Owner :Hinrichs Loretto Parcel :080860
Site :3675 Chase St Wheat Ridge 80212 Xfered :07/18/2001
Mail :3675 Chase St Wheat Ridge Cc 80212 Price
Use :1112 Res,Improved Land Phone
Bedrm:4 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1968 Pool: B1dgSF:1,621 Ac:.20
* ---------------------------MetroScan / Jefferson (CO)
Owner :Zadra Edward T Parcel :203786
Site :*No Site Address* Xfered :08/04/1948
Mail :100 Jefferson County Pkwy #2520 Golden Cc 80419 Price
Use :1177 Vacant,Residential,Limited Size Phone
Bedrm: Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool: B1dgSF: Ac:.02
Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations
or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report.
4
N,- .2GREN
2
ooa
MINOR SUB.
oz~
74'
51'
'
Z5
144.2
125 12$
°c 00 - 048
0 193 009 '0
- 026 3
002 12Ao
6
O 171 O10 in
~
025 4
003 II o
CD
o
ti
rn
7
145
5
ru
-
011
co
= 024
I ooa 10
8
ANDERSON
A E
60
F
.
sutj
6
023
m
i C A S E
U.
.
14
01 Z
w
9
9
-
°0
022 7
005 °m
O 44 CD
013
LL
W
10
_
O 81 ~
N
8
021
03
8
006
'
014
135,
I!
!
1
-
I
!
0105 v
007 7
O 205 m
j
023
co
`
12
0
v
3s'
SUB
-
oz2
13
U ;
020 I
i
r-
r56
14
49 00
I
I
161 161
I
D
0
c
f
0
024
!
15
a
loo
I
1
0 019
o
009 m
0
1
`D
O
i
m
1
00 108
r-
0 16 c
27
I~
YOUNG
•
4
j
•
004 1
p
I'n
I
°m 4
018
Oi0 0
co
n
.
5
!
33
4
Q
028
l0
! o
w SUB
3
0 1 1 0
m
O
145'
LL
I W
6
0
01 6
1
-
w
I
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT on December 4, 2002, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of
the Municipal Building at 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested
citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. The following
petitions shall be heard:
Case No. TUP-02-05 (continued from October 24, 2002): An application filed by
Trugreen Landcare for approval of a one-year Temporary Structure Permit to allow an
office trailer on property zoned Commercial-Two (C-2) and located at 8935 West 44th
Avenue.
Case No. WA-02-12: An application filed by Christopher Murray for approval of a 3'9"
fence height variance to the 6' maximum height allowed resulting in a 9'9" high fence on
property zoned Residential-One B (R-1B) and located at 3739 Chase Street.
Case No. WA-02-14: An application filed by Burger King for approval of a 6 foot
setback variance from the required 10 foot setback for a freestanding sign, resulting in a 4
foot setback AND a request for a 2 foot setback variance from the required 5 foot setback
for a second freestanding sign resulting in a 3 foot setback AND a request for a 9 foot
sign height variance from the maximum allowable 15 foot sign height resulting in a 24
foot high sign for property zoned Commercial One (C-1) and located at 3800 Wadsworth
Boulevard.
Case No. WA-02-15: An application filed by James & Jeremy Frisk for Longshots Bar
& Grill for approval of a complete waiver of Section 26-502 (Landscape Requirements)
and a variance of 10 parking spaces from the required 61 spaces resulting in 51 parking
spaces on property zoned Commercial-One (C-1) and located at 4400 Ward Road.
Case No. WA-02-16: An application filed by Colin Wells for approval of a 10 foot front
yard setback variance from the 30 foot front yard setback requirement resulting in a 20
foot front yard setback for property zoned Residential-Two (R-2) and located at 6670 W.
30th Avenue.
Kathy Field, Administrative Assistant
ATTEST:
Wanda Sang, City Clerk
To be published: Wheat Ridge Transcript
Date: November 14, 2002
Case No.:
App: Last Name:
App: First N ame:
Owns r: Last Name:
Owner: First Nam e:
App Addre ss:
City, State Z ip:
App: Pho ne:
Owner Address:
City/St ate/Zip:
Owner Phone:
Project Address:
Street Name :
Ci ty/State, Zip:
Case Disposition:
Project Planner:
File Lo cation:
Notes:
Follow- Up:
A0212 Quarter Section Map N
Murray Related Cases:
hristopher M. Case Histor y:
ame..
739 Chase St.
Review Body:
seat. Ridge, CO 80212
303-432-0267
APN'
ame
2nd Revie w Body:
I
2nd Review Date
ame
Decision-making Body
P739
Appro val/Denial Date:
Chase Street
JWheat Ridge, CO 80212
Re so/Ordinance No.:
ec
T
Pesicka
dive
o.: NE2.
Variance to th a fence
height stan dard in a
minimum rear yard
BOA -12/04/02
39-251-00-011
BOA -12/04102
Conditior, Approval:
District: ll .
Date Rec eived: 10/14/2002
Pre-App Date: I
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
10/18/02 8,50 AM cd6
CHRISTOPHER MURRAY
RECEIPT NO.-CO13418 AMOUNT
FMSD ZONING APPLICATION F 200.00
ZONE
FMSD ZONING REIMBURSEMENT 90,00
ZREIM
PAYMENT RECEIVED AMOUNT
CK 2510 290.00
TOTAL 290.00