HomeMy WebLinkAboutWA-02-167500 West 29th Avenue The City of
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Whelp
Telephone 303/235-2846 Ridge
FAX 303/235-2857
December 20, 2002
Colin Wells
6670 W. 30" Ave.
Wheat Ridge, CO $0033
Dear Mr. Wells:
RE: Case No. WA-02-16
Please be advised that at its meeting of December 4, 2002, the Board of Adjustment APPROVED
your request for a 10 foot front yard setback variance from the 30 foot front yard setback requirement
resulting in a 20 foot front yard setback for property zoned Residential and located at 6670 W. 30tH
Avenue with the following condition:
Addition shall be constructed of materials which match existing residence and remain
in character with surrounding properties.
Enclosed is a copy of the Certificate of Resolution stating the Board's decision which became
effective the date of the meeting, December 4, 2002. This variance shall automatically expire within
one hundred eighty (180) days of the date it was granted, June 2, 2003.
Please feel free to contact me at (303) 235-2846 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Kathy Fie1T
Administrative Assistant
Enclosures: Certificate of Resolution
Draft of Minutes
cc: WA-02-16 (case file)
Building File
C:\Documents and Settinp\kathyflMy Documents\Kathy\BOA\CORRESP\2002\wa0216approval.wpd
CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTION
I, Ann Lazzeri, Secretary to the City of Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment, do hereby certify that
the following Resolution was duly adopted in the City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson,
State of Colorado on the 4th day of December, 2002.
CASE NO. WA-02-16
APPLICANT'S NAME: Colin Wells
LOCATION: 6670 West 301h Avenue
Upon a motion by Board Member BLAIR and second by Board Member YOUNG, the following
resolution was stated:
WHEREAS, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and
WHEREAS, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-02-16 is an appeal to this Board
from the decision of an administrative officer; and
WHEREAS, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law; and there were no
protests registered against the application; and
WHEREAS, the relief applied for MAY be granted without detriment to the public welfare and
without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing the City of
Wheat Ridge.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Board of Adjustment Application Case No.
WA-02-16 be, and hereby is, APPROVED.
TYPE OF VARIANCE: Request for approval of a 10-foot front yard setback variance from the
30-foot front yard setback requirement resulting in a 20-foot front yard setback for property
zoned Residential-Two (R-2) and located at 6670 West 30`h Avenue.
FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
1. Approval of the request could potentially benefit the surrounding neighborhood.
2. There is not a viable alternative for location of the garage.
3. The request would not be detrimental to the public or injurious to other properties.
4. The request would not increase congestion in public streets.
5. The adequate supply of light and air would not be compromised.
6. A distance of 28 feet will remain from the front of the garage to the curb line.
7. Staff recommended approval.
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION:
Addition shall be constructed of materials which match existing residence and remain in
character with surrounding properties.
Board of Adjustment
Case No. WA-02-16
Page two (2)
VOTE: YES: ABBOTT, BLAIR, DRDA, ECHELMEYER, HOVLAND,
HOWARD, MONTOYA, YOUNG
NO: None
DISPOSITION: Request for approval of a 10-foot front yard setback variance from the 30-foot
front yard setback requirement resulting in a 20-foot front yard setback was APPROVED.
ADOPTED and made effective this 4th day of DECEMBER, 2002.
V
V
JE Y O TOYA, C air an
o stment
nt
C~L ~24
Ann Lazzeri, Secre ar
Board of Adjustment
standards.
3. There are unique circumstances due to existing landscaping located in the
right-of-way.
4. There may be benefits to the neighborhood if the existing landscaping is
enhanced.
With the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall have professionally installed, or as otherwise approved
by staff, a 50-foot long strip of landscaping along the eastern property line
with upright junipers planted at 6-foot intervals or, alternatively, areas
adjacent to the patio as agreed to by staff.
2. The existing landscaping in the right-of-way shall be enhanced with the
installation of one ornamental tree and fifteen shrubs.
3. The owner of 4400 Ward Road will be required to maintain in a viable
condition the landscaping within the right-of-way along 44th Avenue and
Ward Road. This is a trade-off to requiring the owner to create an identical
square footage of landscaping area within their own property.
The motion passed 6-1 with Board Member HOWARD voting no.
(Board Member YOUNG returned to the dais at this time.)
E. Case No. WA-02-16: An application filed by Colin Wells for approval of a 10-
foot front yard setback variance from the 30-foot front yard setback requirement
resulting in a 20-foot front yard setback for property zoned Residential-Two (R-2)
and located at 6670 West 30`h Avenue.
The case was presented by Mike Pesicka. He reviewed the staff report and entered all
pertinent documents into the record. A digital presentation was given. Staff
recommended approval of the application for reasons outlined in the staff report.
Colin Wells
6670 West 30th Avenue
Mr. Wells, the applicant, was sworn in by Chair MONTOYA. He explained that because
the property has no sidewalks there would actually be 28 feet from the proposed garage
to the curb and gutter flow line. If the variance is granted, he plans to build an additional
two-car garage and tam the existing single car garage into a bedroom with bath.
Chair MONTOYA asked if there were individuals present who wished to address this
matter. There was no response.
Upon a motion by Board Member BLAIR and second by Board Member YOUNG,
the following resolution was stated:
Board of Adjustment Page 1
12/04/02
Whereas, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer.; and
Whereas, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-02-16 is an appeal to this
Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and
Whereas, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law; and in
recognition that there were no protests registered against it; and
Whereas, the relief applied for MAY be granted without detriment to the public
welfare and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the
regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge.
Now, therefore, be it resolved that Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-
02-16 be, and hereby is, APPROVED.
Type of Variance: Request for approval of a 10-foot front yard setback variance
from the 30-foot front yard setback requirement resulting in a 20-foot front yard
setback for property zoned Residential-Two (R-2) and located at 6670 West 30th
Avenue.
For the following reasons:
1. Approval of the request could potentially benefit the surrounding
neighborhood.
2. There is not a viable alternative for location of the garage.
3. The request would not be detrimental to the public or injurious to other
properties.
4. The request would not increase congestion in public streets.
5. The adequate supply of light and air would not be compromised.
6. A distance of 28 feet will remain from the front of the garage to the curb line.
7. Staff recommended approval.
With the following condition:
I. Addition shall be constructed of materials which match existing residence
and remain in character with surrounding properties.
The motion passed 8-0.
5. CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING
Chair MONTOYA declared the public hearing closed.
Board of Adjustment Page 12
12/04/02
O
~
n
CD
O
~
O
N
~
C
w
~h O
O
O ~
O O
o c
o
~ o
~ o
07W
¢
O
N
~D
~z
fD
O
UQ ~
K
G
Z
7
D
J
7
TI
7
a
rl
Ui
eD
n
OEM( 0
~
n
O
C
v
r
, I
1-,, _
mtt mJ~
O
O
{
M
O
Mood
e+
*do
O
0
0
0
0
N
?I
d
01
Mood
mooo
OeWO
Meow
51
•J
R•
t4i
C
*do
Iq
0
•J
W
emop-
UO~G ~
n ~r
c
S~.
O.W
Owe
r
ara
0
N
weed
•J
weed
c
Omd
m•
•J
C
z
y
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT
TO: Board of Adjustment
DATE OF MEETING: December 4, 2002
DATE PREPARED: November 21, 2002
CASE NO. & NAME: WA-/02-16/Wells
CASE MANAGER: Michael Pesicka
ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a 10-foot front yard setback variance from the 30-foot
front yard setback requirement resulting in a 20-foot front yard setback
for property zoned Residential-Two (R-2).
LOCATION OF REQUEST:
NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT (S):
6670 W. 301h Avenue
Colin Wells
6670 W. 30`h Avenue
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER (S):
Same as above
APPOXIMATE AREA: 9,375 square feet (.21Acres)
PRESENT ZONING: Residential-Two (R-2)
PRESENT LAND USE: Single Family Residence
SURROUNDING ZONING: N, E, & W, R-2; S, R-1 & R-2
SURROUNDING LAND USE: N, E, & W, Single Family; S, Single Family & Open Space
DATE PUBLISHED: November 14, 2002
DATE POSTED: November 20, 2002
DATE LEGAL NOTICES SENT: November 14, 2002
ENTER INTO THE RECORD:
(X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS
(X) ZONING ORDINANCE
( ) SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS
(X) EXHIBITS
(X) OTHER
Board of Adjustment
1
WA-02-09/Gibson
JURISDICTION:
The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have
been met, therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case.
I. REQUEST
The property in question is located at 6670 W. 30`h Avenue, and is currently as a single-family
residence. The property is zoned Residential-Two (R-2) and is approximately 9,375 square feet in
area (Exhibit 1, Zoning Map).
The applicant (owner), Colin Wells (Exhibit 2, Deed), is requesting a 10-foot front yard setback
variance from the 30-foot front yard requirement. The purpose of the request is to allow for the
addition of an attached garage (Exhibit 3, Application, Exhibit 4, Applicant Letter).
II. SITE PLAN
The applicant has submitted a site plan showing the location for the proposed addition
(Exhibit 5, Site Plan). At approximately 9,375 square feet the property exceeds the minimum
lot area requirements for a single-family home in the R-2 zone district. The property has lot
frontage of 75 feet, which meets the minimum lot width requirement for a single-family
residence in the R-2 zone district. The proposed addition will not affect any utility easements
on the property (Exhibit 6, Improvement Location Certificate/Survey). The proposed
addition would be attached to the existing garage and access would be gained from the
existing driveway (Exhibit 7, Elevations). If the 556 square foot addition is built, the
property will not exceed the 40% maximum allowable building coverage in the R-2 zone
district.
III. VARIANCE CRITERIA
Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a variance request:
1. Can the property in question yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if
permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in
which it is located?
If the request is denied, the property may still receive a reasonable return in use. The
property is currently utilized as residential property, and this use may continue, regardless
of the outcome of this variance.
2. If the variance were granted, would it alter the essential character of the locality?
If the garage is built, the essential character of the locality could be altered. There are no
other properties on the block with substantial encroachments into front yard setbacks. The
average front yard setback of adjacent properties is approximately 28 feet. However, no
viable alternative exists that would be of less impact to the locality than what the applicant
has proposed.
Board of Adjustment
WA-02-09/Gibson
3. Does the particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the
specific property involved result in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner)
as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were
carried out?
The lot does not have a unique shape. It is a typical rectangular lot, and is relatively flat. At
almost 9,375 square feet in size, the lot exceeds the minimum lot size requirement in the R-
2 zone district. There are no unique topographical conditions that exist on the property that
render any portion of the lot unbuildable. The house was constructed in1956, and was built
up to the front and side yard setbacks leaving no room to encroach into those areas without
a variance. As proposed, the existing driveway could be used to access the addition.
4. Has the alleged difficulty or hardship been created by any person presently having an
interest in the property?
The applicant, who has sole interest in the property, has created a self-imposed hardship by
proposing a structure that does not meet setback requirements for the district. A one car
attached garage already exists on the property. The proposed garage could be built in the
rear yard of the property, but a new curb cut would be required, and only 9 feet 10 inches
separates the house from the west property line, which leaves little room for a driveway.
Placing a garage in the rear yard would require a large area for maneuvering a vehicle, and
would necessitate a long driveway and extensive paving over land that is currently
landscaped.
5. Would the granting of the variance be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located,
by, among other things, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent
property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing the
danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or substantially diminishing or
impairing property values within the neighborhood?
The request would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other properties
in the area. The adequate supply of light and air would not be compromised as a result of
these requests. The request would not increase congestion in the streets, nor increase the
danger of fire. The request would most likely not have an effect on property values in the
neighborhood.
6. If criteria 1 through 5 are found, then, would the granting of the variance result in a
benefit or contribution to the neighborhood or the community, as distinguished from
an individual benefit on the part of the applicant, or would granting of the variance
result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities?
The request would possibly result in a contribution or benefit to the neighborhood, the
request would not result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities.
IV. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Board of Adjustment
WA-02-09/Gibson
Upon review of the above request, staff concludes that the above criteria are supportive of
the variance request. Staff has found that there are unique circumstances attributed to the request
that would warrant approval of a variance. Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL for the
following reasons:
1. Approval of the request could potentially benefit the surrounding
neighborhood.
2. There is not a viable alternative for location of the garage.
3. The request would not be detrimental to the public or injurious to other
properties.
4. The request would not increase congestion in public streets.
5. The adequate supply of light and air would not be compromised.
With the following conditions:
1. Addition shall be constructed of materials which match existing residence and
remain in character with surrounding properties.
Board of Adjustment
WA-02-09/Gibson
Sl*e LocA-+f01^
N
W
N
lXHIBIT I
NW 25
S g
~ ~ a $ 3
R
MS-
R-1
OFFICIAL
ZONING MAP
WHEAT RIDGE
COLORADO
DEPARTMENT OF
"NNING AND DEVELOPMENT
- PARCEL/LOT BOUNDARY
(DESIGNATES OWNERSHIP)
- WATER FEATURE
* DENOTES MULTIPLE ADDRESSES
100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN
(APPROXIMATE LOCATION)
SW 25
®
O 100 500 Feet
ETTTSWWW~
MAP ADOPTED: June 15, 1994
el ml sI aI .I1L
N
o }
vJ
o
ooF~a
T~ vii3aai
x
x
w
p
U)
O
O
x
EH
O
N
W ~
W 14
A m
a"I W
F
z
U
m ~
~O
0
W W'
Q ~
F .O
O
O
O
U
O
u
r
O
N
a N
v H
w r1
n
W -
O f1
O
U
1J
O ad
U a
.u.
O w
ti
N
O
U
m
~i
JJ
N
N
O
G
Ol
x
U
O
t`
m
b0
h
3
F
I
I
H I
z1
I
~ Q I
Eh az I
I
x I
I
I
1
00
75 1
td wo I
o
O I
U ~ I
I
O O ~
m o I
I
I
I
I
O I
I
~ I
I
C I
y I
I
C'. ti I
O ^ I
m o 1
N ~ I
W tp I
W uj I
N I
Fj ~ I
I
w I
O I
I
~,v o
U O
aO 4 Z
v
03
~ B
o
g
o
~ 3 a
0
P~ y O
o v m,,
. ~ o 0
O T y y
o „ R
~
0 2 ° '
C
C
vj p
~
w
I ~
w q
I ~ o
~
a
!a
1 ~ ro w
v W
I
p
I m N
I b fJ
b .
I ~ x+ O
I
0
O
bop O
Sb U
S4
O
3
O
O
~
0
U
y a
N
I y n
I ~ ~
0
O
N
I(!
I
N
11
3
~
~
~ w
> ai
R
o
N
S
'
U)
I a ~
h
N
I ~ ~
O
w
I- w o
W
rD
I eu
O
ti h
U
w
O
I G E ~ ~
.
v
N
~
O N
I
.-i
JJ
y O y
I ~ ~ .a o
O
.7
O
U
~UUIP. dVN
I O 'J'/ ,
AMA ANA l mAum.ooo a Ly. C
O
W
O
S+
O
O
U
N
a
x
s
m
Z
a
it
0
M
N
n
t`
h
~N+
n
a
i
0
~s
C
s'
7
h o
O
u
a
~
ca
0..i d
~
a
~ a R
v
t0
_
P
N O
C
c
>r
r
~
B
y ~
N R V
O Cr
J
•U
N W
U
'
~
O i
^
d i w
~ y
m
F
C
y.'
.
U
u o u v -
N
o A
-,-A
on
o
GL
~
S
a
R
~
Q
O
'
NO
❑
~J
y
N
U v .a U F c
ti
G➢ U Y
~
]
-
CJ U
~
O
v m~ u v
~ w C p
a
w.
e
R w
a~
e
~
,y
~
° o
v
`o
a
a
r
~
p
y
G
.
o.
~.j '
^3
a o s c. u
o s
a O a
o
o
~
v
a
o ti v
c. v
cc
❑
O
"
-O °
~ 'a
~
y
y
U U
N ~ N
V
'
O
"J
'
n
'a
L
'
^
U
L
CJ a
m
~
IT7
`S
T
Y
u ~
Gq
a ti ~ ~
°
e
r.
.
i 'oi N
v
a
~ .
c 'u o T o
W a y
o Bun
w' m
v
d
.O
~ C w R a m
.J a
m
o .y U
p
Y_
~
2
F y~ ^J ~ r
.
3
y W
R k u
zzF ~J-
.
U
~
N
G
U
y e w
N ~ y
i
c3 U~
. tJ
s
_
iC
T. rri
N N .0 V U is
c~ O
7
> 3
O
y O u e°p m u° b
3~?~
~
3
A
w.
C v
G
r tit '
`
~
_
n~
'
Y z
.
.f ❑
G
la
~ d~ 3 O
N
h ti
G
R~ U
W 5. Fem., m u
~ ;J f7 V~ C
v F
'
~
>
U
_
ttl
O H 6
`
E
~ O' U ~
U t`®
w
N
F
w
~ O
a
G O
F v' F 'y 'N m o ,W o z 0 N
~O
6
4.
s
a
N ~
O R
~
'q
J
w
>1 p
A o . o
z
w ~ N
r ~
o c z
w
~a
O
Cf)
W
W
w
w
I]
C)
F
3
E
h SI
~i O
D
0
m
a
~ s
U
a
ci
rl
f]
v
pgy
C
U
T
g
0
a
Of WHEgp LAND L > CASE PROCESSING APP CATION.. of W!+Eq>P
V Pm~ n 3~J)ge 0803 o c o m
~OLORA00 OL ORPO
/n (Please print or type all information)
Applicant ~ ~U I It] 0 • 4e e I ~ J Address Lk 70 V d, 30 '~'dw" Phone 30,3 V V-9(Pql
City wneaf 2 Stated Zip UZI4 Fax? a2a2- 0(o
Owner 1q• id e I iS Address wv-w W, Sam 6vQ- Phone 50.3 X17- cl&q
City W {'IQ 1:dQ . State / Zip UZIy Fax 72-0 g3L-Od'O(o
Contact 11/1 1q. Weil Address (Q 00 btu • 0 M Ale. Phone 3034/7d"- 9W
City hlheal 1/-V AO Zip 0Z/L/ Fax7ZO93Z-O&b
(The person listed as contact ill be contacted to answer questions regarding this application, provide additional information when necessary, post
public hearing signs, and will receive a copy of the staff report prior to Public Hearing.)
Location of request (address): 0 W- 30fn dye-, hm e1 al e CO hl /
Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request.)
Application submittal requirements on reverse side
❑ Change of zone or zone conditions ❑ Special Use Permit
❑ Consolidation Plat ❑ Subdivision: Minor (5 lots or less)
❑ Flood Plain Special Exception ❑ Subdivision: Major (More than 5 lots)
❑ Interpretation of Code ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Right of Way Vacation
❑ Planned Building Group ❑ Temporary Use, Building, Sign
❑ Site Development Plan approval A'Variance/Waiver (from Section Zlo-115.e
❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment ❑ Other:
Detailed description of request see Out-fachel-k ~P tE P
Required information:
A D tN_
e,
assessors Pace. Number: Size of Lot (acres or square footo tagOP~;
Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning:
Current Use: Proposed Use:
I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this
application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above, without whose consent the requested action
cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners must submit power-of-attomey from the owner which approved of
this action on his behalf.
&U Cb9x~
Signature of Applicant - Sly a
Subscribed and sworn to me this day of 2(I~
N P tc
~-4 f
com ission expires r
be filled out by staff:
Date received( 6 Fee $ X6,00 Receipt No. 44 6 qk Case No. 01"- ,-l(
Comp Plan Desig.// Zoning 0` Quarter Section Ma{ 5~ 0A 5
Related Case No. Pre-App Mtg. Date Case Manager NCi51~ ko
tae
EHIBIT 4
Colin A. Wells
6670 West 30u' Avenue
Wheat Ridge, CO 80214
(H) 303-478-9691
(W) 720-932-0805
November 5, 2002
City of Wheat Ridge
Michael Pesicka
7500 West 291h Avenue
Wheat Ridge, CO 80215
Subject: Request for Zoning Variance for 6670 West 30`h Avenue
Wheat Ridge, CO 80214
Dear Michael,
This letter shall serve as official request and documentation of request for zoning
variance for above stated property. Information contained herein shall outline the basis
for request, and address potential concerns by the City of Wheat Ridge and adjacent
property owners. The intent of the request is to clarify with certainty that the proposed
improvement to the property has been thoroughly reviewed to ensure, if variance is
granted, a quality addition, with first rate craftsmanship will be constructed.
The specifics of the improvement are to include the addition of a new two (2) car garage,
attached to the existing residence on the north elevation. The new garage with the
footprint of 19'W x 20'D would be positioned on the east side, directly in front of the
existing single car garage. Plans also include to renovate the existing garage space and
incorporate a new master bedroom and full bath.
Materials selected for the project will be seemingly identical match to those of the
existing exterior of the residence. However, windows and doors will be of more modern,
thermally resistive, materials. Brick of same color and texture has been located and
would be used for the garage construction. General landscape improvements would be
included between the new garage and existing front entry.
The basis for this request results from the existing layout of the residence within the
property lines. As situated, the residence consumes all usable space on the east and west
side of the property. Setbacks on both sides would neither allow for a drive to the
backyard where by including a detached garage. The physical constraints of the
residence within the property preclude any garage construction other than what is
included in the variance request.
The following information will attempt to satisfy those question of fact as proposed in
Sec. 26-115.C.3.
A. The property in question will yield a reasonable return in use where by increasing
living space from 1,150 SF to 1,400 SF. The net result will be a three bedroom,
two bath house, more suitable for a four person family. Additionally, parking
spaces for two cars will be created.
B. If the variance were granted, there would be minimal alteration to the character of
the locality. Specifically due to shape of structure (maintaining existing look of
hiped-gable roof) and material selection (color and texture match of brick to
existing) the residence will maintain the same look as familiar in the
neighborhood.
C. As previously described, a mere inconvenience is not descript of the topography
of the property in question or its capacity to yield other options for a garage
addition. Simply, the improvement as proposed, is the only option for a two (2)
car garage along with increased living space.
D. The difficulty and hardship associated with this improvement rests in the existing
residence relative to the property lines. No improvements, alterations or additions
have been previously performed by myself as the owner of the property.
E. The granting of this variance should create no major impacts to public welfare, be
injurious to other property or impair air or light to adjacent property. The
addition of a two (2) car garage will be of benefit to congestion of public streets.
Lastly, the improvement should not impair adjacent property values, but
conversely have financial benefit from neighboring improvements.
F. Confidently, I believe this improvement will be of benefit to the neighborhood
and may promote additional improvements to adjacent structures. The area in
which this property is located is a nice quiet family neighborhood, and resulting
tasteful improvements will only ensure longevity of this environment.
With the above stated, I certainly hope the review committee will review the
information contained within this submittal, and make a determination for variance
approval. If additional information is required or changes to improvement must be
considered, I will be happy to entertain input and will provide feedback as required.
Sincerely,
Colin A Wells
}
I
~ ~ 4 A ~ s e~' ! ~ ~ a1 I
~e4YM
v,,..~.,,,~~._
J
i
i
i
LA t ~
f
y
f
a
p a f
,M s
~ i A 1
i
R
t 4 ` 9
! s i f t
ra it
_ e
} r t
W t P11222 RON III
sYefnRV - r r ~ r AIW6 i IL Nd
I ' r. R~ 3 r
s
}
t
¢ r 1
D
..era f_ ~ t
}
g F
Y r
a r S
4 Si i
? i i r r ~ a
° i i
P - ~ c t
">'4
ss.
.k~
r ~ f Kai ,.~vNM'-'S-nn. s efWUr~
M
fi
N
t~
19
,OZ=„I :ajaos vq W ~ (n ° rn E I
c c
Noc> I
p 3 > ol-C I
zZ 7~ I z o~ "NOT I
,I~ C I
10
J \`Vl 9 \Ar~, o o, p a
J I: U C C> O Q.
CCU
N s Ill > > E Nxoc
w t' f 7 I 4 > t> 2' I
4 C N C 4 3 W I fi ' i
J N Q C n r II ' "-'O n O i O O k 5R I -ij4i
o -Y ~U 4 o ~a>~
o N. a p 47 4 o c (Z} j
0 Q)
J1 g) 3 D i "N~co Imo;
o w 3~ r9 h3 q
w w 2 8 +L. U> > c I p
2 o o o co "
N IY o
a o w '~A1 10 fC I 1
w 0) a) d 4D W w j4 ~~v~ap
U o E o
a .oJE Z N
:E U) m c o-° a° c
+I 11'~~ F~ \ O U C~ cX
3 C O> N> O 2
0-0 =0
O> w
0- a') R z
W C 4E~ "N TLL O ° WE ~ > NV°m~
N m v W O p > J.... vi v, S F O
c _
m U > O~ > C O C O ~2K rw
m o m d d d 7 O
i L:
,N, N d 3w° zo
m6 L> E h E 0
0
U 1 E.
N 0 m o~ u` Iml Z O • N ] d Vl > 0 gO~ ~w
O 01 n c m m o ONO s (/7 +p+ L C i= 'p O ° N 0
pp wwo
•T, m m 0 0 Z - w K C> U p C ° 2- tt. I- _
U WW, Z u)
W LL O L J L L C O` D 'E
LU -J o °m d D 7 O C 0. > Rww
p ~U~oF
7 t 4' !D U Z
w
Z!L . 40 w U> N 7 ZOUWiz
N 0 m U
W Gc~ w`a° m w NOli c•c UL o VQwrF
m O N}} O U C C > C> 4 V 5
m O
1 ' R1 N cvi m m y 0~4 ~Q3N UU
019 E"D 5 i i E it J LL Z F T t- O % pt
mm UUU4 _
W O c0 F- U n>' 41c0 w
Ra ~n II IIYwaay J JUUN N > >4E U
~w01 0Uti4m L -C X r z
nU
a
a
~ r pa a ~ 4
i I q ',y.+«
~ _ ~ ~ ...,,.,r~ r,. , a' a ,
7 " ~jj..~d s , ~ n
« ~-r. Y $y ° t J e.
, $ ~ rte.. r ,p
a • s etia ~ y " .d
a D $ 4 a « e ~ g q « « ~ •r A ,
r ~ ~ r •t .a « « F „ ti: 4 re • « r
w « ~ ~ r~" e « " ~ yr
r , g'a , a Ir~
s ~ ~;'°•e
,r m s .y4 . ~ . f F + • f , s~ # ' 1~ q s 8
ti r . a. I haq ) gLlf rr s`A ~_y4I« 'd~ •a I ~ ,p a S
9 • R }
e « . ' 9, A ",r4 • { « .h ~ n r 4
~ ' «'ie~4: '.d« .v x' • r,a a ~ e, h. A ' r•t a 11.
a !I ° j~ ~.tif f .n
• ~ aY t d ° 'C, s ~ 'rcS K:` 4 ' r+ f r ~ ® a t ~
~ a 'F3 1v+~ , ♦ ° ~b
wR^ rMe.. a . Mrd. , . 3 fH • a as ~ , s.s ay+: «r c ra.°< a +r, 1 a r+.. ~y A y ~ °4 , a a. ✓ . 1 ~ r1 , I M , r .
q ! + V
r A' f « m ~ s
♦ a • r
s { a e a •dp` c r • / ~ 1 a > ` ry adkr ~ la
i a ~ , a
• r ~
r ~ ° ~ x
a W , n> a
, ~ e
r.
« - e o
~ ' v6. " o
e a
. ~ ~ ,
w ~ , '
* R + t i • p 4B w.` ,
o
4 y r + m 6 e A '
4 ~ « " " J " : ~ ' a b
J> a ~ ~ ~ a « > ° 1
' J . r .a pff tl e ~
• r "
* Y x. s J J 3 e S d a
. _ ' • 4. { r•'
'f ~ i i
• • ~ , ' i~ e. ,4. a 4. • 4 J~ m ^ ~ ,a 9 o ~ ~ ,4
•.J•'+^A' T..1 y..•~. P.• i 1. t j l~rj J• "a" ' 4 'A. Y .w.. Tl. . ♦b ! ~yJ „N
~J e i S ' r , ~iry4.G 8 a. n
' ~ 4 :
.p , .J , ,afi 4
b • • tie 4 "i. t J e
" , ~ . r R~ s. i{~J rill, r .'+n °JA.." ~ ` ~ f , . 4 e = p a ± .
a „r,~s. ;S. . a Y J A M "a• tf, a• ~p r v.4 1,. -
^ . • A
~ " « , r
t" J J • ' .r t• r.p
~ ~ ~ a • - y " i y 4 M
n1 a a t j.
` " ,tl t , , ~r ~ ~ ) r a a
r J " a~ ti a •.d, i v ,i e
' 0 ♦J
1 ♦ Y y MJ ~ t . d ..v
r • s . , • •
"J
y ~ P a M
e ~ • A Jay & J i °
• ~ ~ w4 J e J '
P . J} " r
J °D
~ -
v 1
. A a
e ° J A
J , r " • r
• ~y~ '
t
4
r
4
W
9
4 1
a~ 1
• > t
~
6 +
r
s
h
0
4 e ~ ~ „ > o 4
4 + ~ e 1 Y • , - r
{ y, ~ } a
•M
s a r o
a •:.k~ t ~ y R ~
A F t ~ ~ e Hy !Y
e ~ r O ► ~ '
M r F~]n
_ N~~ a
,Y
+
t f ~ ,
w g s e
, ,F a '
~ ~ s ~ ~ +t ~ e , a 4r 1 a
~ ! , a ~,~w ~
Y a ! 4 a 8 r 4 $
' *f ~ } e~ ' ~ ~ le 9
r ^ ~ q,' w 6 t ~ ~ ~
r ~ a~ ~ e i ~ 4
4' « n
q
f ~ .
4 } ° ljdPp~
7 , ~ t
a~ ~ •
e ~ ~ ~ ~ ; e
w ~
t
s s
k r r s k
ry ~
m
' ! A .
P ~ , ' Y v
° ~ ~'t~ e
`
9
A ~ • ~ •
w.rr~ u +Ma+.w, r, r.. ~r~ w. r. e~.~.~.~ a.. ..w. a w . e.%r+~. »o-.3. wr. e....r wnv.M..~M~'Mw'rM.www ee x... ,..x r, n ~ e Y,e. e
e ♦ + ~ 3 e }
• ° t~ : f ah .
* ! r
s a ~ ~ b ~ ~
0 x r #e e ~ ° ~•Y b• ° oo ° n e a s 4
y 'y . ror.w 4~.~w s> _ a e + r a 1r ep s s a ~ o♦ a r • .a t ~ s 4 r a Yee a •r a .+b 4N~® • e 1 • . r♦ era ♦ f. ~•."Y 0 •~s a ~ r. fw ♦ A'i . b as b rr Mi atb ;+e • ~
a ~~raw •i s' d~S ..r~~ ~wa~ rr.kl .
POSTING CERTIFICATION
CASE NO. k
PLANNING COMMISSION / CITY COUNCIL / BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (Circle One)
HEARING DATE: PEO Magkg t - 7-007-
I,
residing at
;(WI
(address)
as the applicant for Case No. LJA-OZ-1(a , hereby certify that I have posted the Notice of
Public Hearing at S&Agr OF ADJIJSTMEN7' IN TNT. ~ !L (a~ '.S
(location)
on this ff`3ay of NoJaplagg, , 2002 > and do hereby certify that
said sign has been posted and remained in place for fifteen (15) days prior to and including the
scheduled day of public hearing of this case. The sign was posted in the position shown on the
map below. /
Signa
NOTE: This form must be submitted at the public hearing on this case and will be placed in the
applicant's case file at the Department of Planning and Development.
cil.A 3o"bFoJE
e Aplan ni nglforms1posti ngeert
/
Rev. 616/01 l9(.,"70 0.
N
I
{
I
d
~
V
=
N
]
~
I
a
V
d'
a
~
N
Q
1
C
>
d
U
d
W
`
z
W
C
1
(y
K
~
a
d
d E °
a
d„ u
¢a c
E °
ae
c°
L4,
m
co
co
c°
c°
X U m L
~
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Q m ~ $
U
Q
N
O
a
a
v
`w ~
a
v
a
a
a
v
c
uio
o
_
w aio
aio
d do
o
c aio
m
aio
m
aio
> m
w
O
m
Y> m
_
~
U
c> m
°
m
a »
.w
-0
y>
N
U
>
N
U
r
-
o
N
d
d
N
d L U
Q] O U
O
E U
L U
m
U
U L U
N O U
m L O
U
0
N U
L_
S O U
L
d O U
,
Y
O U
N
`
a
M N
~
m N
D)
N Qj
m M d
D)
N N
~
Q
0 W
N y
~
M
5
J M
m
m
c d rn
e8 m
m
m
m
E
m
m
y
y
m
Q
D o
O m W
2i rn
m K
_ N K
o r K
U n K
°
K
_
!6 -p o.
m
N m
r m
s° m
c
r m
Zi m
m <o m
co m
M
<o m
_
V
d
`
t° d
21
' L
W (O L
L
~O L
~O L
(O L
_
'a 'o
a K v
N ~ Q ~ C N ~
Q
O
¢
U: c
U U °'O
K W W
E
m
v
N
v
M
a
a
v
u~
v
v
r
a
m
v
rn
v
C~
M
d
U
N)
°
°
a0
°
c0
°
ro
°
W
°
°
uo
°
a0
°
W
C
Q
m
°
m
°
m
°
m
°
m
°
m
°
w
°
m
°v
m
°v
O
U' O
o
v
m
v
°
v
m
v
m
v
m
v
v
m
m
°m
00
~
m
w
m
rn
m
m
m
m
m
m
Q -
E
°m
°m
°rn
°m
°m
°m
°rn
m
°rn
Q Q W z
n
n
n
n
r
r
n
W=0
o
N
O ~ Q Z
a
Z
z
}
F
- O S
g
c
~ I,
a
b
C
l W
w
AR
d
~
d
d
N
C
U
`
m
c
v
v
v
~
a
o
y
c
z
?
wl
K
C
7
-y
a
K
t
K
\
i
e~
d _
o
N
r C d
.
0
Q
E
E °
u
v
L o m
¢a c
E °1 °
at
so
<o
~
w r
a
N
N
N
N
NN
x U L
N
O
Q m,2 E
U
U
_
0
O
N
lE
d
a
V
❑ M
C
p
` ~
CO p
0
O
N
O
N
U °
m
m
N
y U O
NU
y
m
m~
2o
m 0
~
U
y
a
N
' O
0
SOU
o
m o
a
,
N
N
a
~ "6 C-
W
N
'
w
N
~
N
V~ J
a
N
N ❑
J
U
I
D U1 -O N L~
~ ~ ~ ~ K U N
a
Q
~j
>
>
L >
>
0 W. E N N
Y rG O
O
~i
N O
.
Ix U i LL W
E
m
d
u
m
°
m
°
°
iM
O
C
R
m
m
a
m
°
O
`o
v
m
v
m
p 00
~
m
4
O
E
m
W
V
M
M
F
QQW Z
z
n
n
n
O
W = in
2 F p ~
LL
N O
O Q Z
a
Z
} o W
Z
~ O 2
c
U r, a
~I
7500 West 29th Avenue
The City of
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Wheat Ridge
Telephone 303/235-2846
FAX 303/235-2857
November 20, 2002
Dear Property Owner:
This is to inform you of Case No. WA-02-16 which is a request for approval of a 10 foot front
yard setback variance from the 30 foot front yard setback requirement resulting in a 20 foot front
yard setback for property zoned Residential-Two (R-2) and located at 6670 W. 30th Avenue.
This case will heard by the Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment in the Council Chambers of the
Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue on December 4, 2002, at 6:30 p.m.
As an area resident or interested parry, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit
written comments.
If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at 303-
235-2846. Thank you.
Planning Division.
Ct\Documents and Settings\kathyWy Documents\Kathy\BOA\pubnotice\2002\wa0216.wpd
r Y/LL. 7 6 0•/O-" / g,.
Owner
:Becker Robert R
Pax,cl
:021590
Site
:6690
W 30Th Ave Wheat Ridge 80214
Xfered
:10/01/1987
Mail
:6690
W 30Th Ave Wheat Ridge Cc 80214
Price
Use
:1112
Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
2
Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1957 Pool:
B1dgSF
:974 Ac:
*
MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Braun Orvin
Parcel
:021638
Site
:2930
Pierce St Wheat Ridge 80214
Xfered
Mail
:2930
Pierce St Wheat Ridge Co 80214
Price
Use
:1112
Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
3
Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1935 Pool:
B1dgSF
:1,079 Ac:
*
-
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner Owner
:Eyster George W/Marion
Parcel
:021726
Site
:6795
W 29Th Ave Denver 80214
Xfered
:01/26/2000
Mail
:6795
W 29Th Ave Denver Cc 80214
Price
:$149,750 Full
Use
:1112
Res,Improved Land
Phone
:303-238-7375
Bedrm:
2
Bath:1.00 TotRm: - YB:1945 Pool:
B1dgSF
:889 Ac:.24
*
: MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Barckholtz Judith A
Parcel
:021762
Site
:6650
W 30Th Ave Wheat Ridge 80214
Xfered
:09/29/1997
Mail
:6650
W 30Th Ave Wheat Ridge Cc 80214
Price
:$141,000 Full
Use
:1112
Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
2
Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1955 Pool:
B1dgSF
:1,376 Ac:
*
: MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Deandrea Earnest R
Parcel
:021871
Site
:6791
W 29Th Ave Wheat Ridge 80214
Xfered
:01/29/1991
Mail
:6791
W 29Th Ave Wheat Ridge Cc 80214
Price
:$82,500
Use
:1112
Res,Improved Land
Phone
:303-202-6191
Bedrm:
3
Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1924 Pool:
B1dgSF
:1,064 Ac:
*
: MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
owner
:Funk
William A
Parcel
:021886
Site
:2930
Otis Ct Wheat Ridge 80214
Xfered
mail
:2930
Otis Ct Wheat Ridge Cc 80214
Price
Use
:1112
Res,Improved Land
Phone
:303-233-4412
Bedrm:
3
Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1961 Pool
: B1dgSF
:1,650 Ac:
*
: MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Hawkins Harold W
Parcel
:021905
Site
:6675
W 29Th Ave Wheat Ridge 80214
Xfered
:01/15/1976
Mail
:6675
W 29Th Ave Wheat Ridge Cc 80214
Price
Use
:1112
Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
3
Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1909 Pool
: B1dgSF
:1,478 Ac:
*
: MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Wells Colin
Parcel
:022064
Site
:6670
W 30Th Ave Wheat Ridge 80214
Xfered
:03/01/2002
Mail
:6670
W 30Th Ave Wheat Ridge Cc 80214
Price
:$190,000 Full
Use
:1112
Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
2
Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1956 Pool
: B1dgSF
:1,161 Ac:
*
: MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Kurth Ronald L
Parcel
:022323
Site
:6630
W 30Th Ave Wheat Ridge 80214
Xfered
:07/06/1994
Mail
:6630
W 30Th Ave Wheat Ridge Cc 80214
Price
:$95,000
Use
:1112
Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
3
Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1955 Pool
: B1dgSF
:1,682 Ac:
*
: MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Steger John J
Parcel
:022721
Site
:2955
Otis Ct Wheat Ridge 80214
Xfered
:04/23/1962
Mail
:2955
Otis Ct Wheat Ridge Cc 80214
Price
:$4,000
Use
:1112
Res,Improved Land
Phone
:303-237-8527
Bedrm
:3
Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1963 Pool
: B1dgSF
:1,215 Ac:
Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations
or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report.
MetroScan /
Jefferson
(CO) -
Owner
:Leslie V Watts Trus,_he
Par-el
:022866
Site
:2950 Otis Ct Wheat Ridge 80214
Xfered
:06/26/2000
Mail
:2952 Otis Ct Denver Co 80214
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
2 Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:
1961 Pool:
B1dgSF:
750
Ac:
*
: MetroScan /
Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Watts Leslie V/B M Trust
Parcel :
022869
Site
:6730 W 30Th Ave Wheat Ridge 80214
Xfered :
06/30/2000
Mail
:2952 Otis Ct Denver Cc 80214
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
3 Bath:2.00 TotRm: YB:
1958 Pool:
B1dgSF:
2,010
Ac:
*
: MetroScan /
Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Wheatridge Recreation District
Parcel :
195622
Site
:*No Site Address*
Xfered :
10/28/1969
Mail
:PO Box 638 Wheat Ridge Cc 80034
Price
Use
:9149 Exempt,POlitical Sub,Land
Phone
Bedrm:
Bath: TotRm: YB:
Pool:
B1dgSF:
Ac:.98
Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations
or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report.
17A
W d 1091 22
001
100 ' 50' 50' 100' 146.44'
37 5' 90' 75' 75' 75 75'
2- 3 -0 4 5 6 7 8
0
o Q IF F Y ~ 012 013 014 ~ co
M
29' 22 90'
` 9q 01 .
29 8 v 75' 75' 75' 75
9
10
Ave.
\N W. 30 th
N
S U B
_
ss
)D
o
006
l l
75 75 75 75
10
'
15
12 13 14
005
112 s
N
004
003
002
001 N
2-11
2-B
J
Gin
Ifi
75'
75'
75
75'
7~
r
i
ti
I 3-B
CITY 9 CO. OF DENVER
4A
777-425
` 016
m
~
I
4
IQ
Io
N
,25
'
20
112 5 5
4-C =
i
WHEATRIDGE REC.
0l9 m
DISTRICT WH
O
0 22
2141-434
E
W
90D59741 ~
020 6 m
02 4~v
I
I C~
024 p
B
~
p
10 0
° 7 v
P
Q`
P ? 023
O
'0 021 0
4'01
n
2512
3
1
r
112 5' 118.32'
West 29 th Ave. 60' 59 6 1 7 125 100' 150'
2-A 2F 2-G O
7
n
v
`
74.36
i
0(9D
II
12
12
O
IM
mmffmo
11
I
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT on December 4, 2002, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of
the Municipal Building at 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested
citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. The following
petitions shall be heard:
Case No. TUP-02-05 (continued from October 24, 2002): An application filed by
Trugreen Landcare for approval of a one-year Temporary Structure Permit to allow an
office trailer on property zoned Commercial-Two (C-2) and located at 8935 West 44th
Avenue.
Case No. WA-02-12: An application filed by Christopher Murray for approval of a 3'9"
fence height variance to the 6' maximum height allowed resulting in a 9'9" high fence on
property zoned Residential-One B (R-1B) and located at 3739 Chase Street.
Case No. WA-02-14: An application filed by Burger King for approval of a 6 foot
setback variance from the required 10 foot setback for a freestanding sign, resulting in a 4
foot setback AND a request for a 2 foot setback variance from the required 5 foot setback
for a second freestanding sign resulting in a 3 foot setback AND a request for a 9 foot
sign height variance from the maximum allowable 15 foot sign height resulting in a 24
foot high sign for property zoned Commercial One (C-1) and located at 3800 Wadsworth
Boulevard.
Case No. WA-02-15: An application filed by James & Jeremy Frisk for Longshots Bar
& Grill for approval of a complete waiver of Section 26-502 (Landscape Requirements)
and a variance of 10 parking spaces from the required 61 spaces resulting in 51 parking
spaces on property zoned Commercial-One (C-1) and located at 4400 Ward Road.
Case No. WA-02-16: An application filed by Colin Wells for approval of a 10 foot front
yard setback variance from the 30 foot front yard setback requirement resulting in a 20
foot front yard setback for property zoned Residential-Two (R-2) and located at 6670 W.
30th Avenue.
Kathy Field, Administrative Assistant
ATTEST:
Wanda Sang, City Clerk
To be published: Wheat Ridge Transcript
Date: November 14, 2002
~r
M ~
5
'
~
,yy
C ,
'k, 3 ~ ~ it
b N~ 1
ST
~~i
3
1
g~
4
Case No.:
A0Y76 _
Quarter Section Map No
App: Last Name:
egs _
Related Cases:
App: First Name:
Colin
Case History:
Owner: Last Name:
ame
Owner: First Name:
ame
App Address:
6670 W. 30th Ave.
Review Body:
City, State Zip:
JVVheal: Ridge, CO 80214 1
App: Phone:
303-078.9691
APN:
Owner Address:
2nd Review Body:
City/State/Zip:
ame
-
2nd Review Date:
Owner Phone:
Decision-making Body:
Project Address:
6670
~
_
Approval/Denial Date:
Street Name:
est30th Avenue
City/State, Zip:
heat Rid e, CO80214
Reso/Ordinance No.:
Case Disposition: pproved
Project Planner: [Fesicka
File Location:
Closed
Notes:
Follow-Up:
10 ft front yard setback
arianee from the required
1 30 ft front yard setback,
resulting in a 20 ft front _
BOA-1214102
39-253-70-004__
i
BOA-1214102
1121412002
J
F7
Conditions of Approval:
1. Addition shall be
onstructed of materials
hich match existing
residence and remain in i
District:
Date Received: 11T12355
Pre-App Date: r-~