HomeMy WebLinkAboutWA-03-157500 West 29th Avenue
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033
Telephone 303/235-2846
FAX 303/235-2857
August 14, 2003
Mark & Julie Bymaster
3295 Fenton Street
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Bymaster:
RE: Case No. WA-03-15
Ridge
Please be advised that at its meeting of July 24, 2003, the Board of Adjustment APPROVED your
request for approval of a 5-foot side yard setback variance from the 10-foot side yard setback
requirement for a two-story structure on property zoned Residential-One C (R-1C) and located at
3295 Fenton Street for the following reasons:
The two-story addition directly abuts closely only a few feet of the existing dwelling
on the property immediately adjoining on the south.
The architect has made an effort to design an addition which is compatible
aesthetically with the existing structure and is compatible with the existing
neighborhood.
3. Structural considerations within the existing foundation prohibit the addition of a
second story to the existing foundation.
4. The second story addition will be minimally visible from the street as it occurs
primarily in the core of the structure. The proposed wood siding on the first floor
would not be significantly visible from the street view.
5. Testimony was given by some adjacent neighbors in favor of the variance.
6. Staff recommended approval of the variance.
Enclosed is a copy of the Certificate of Resolution, as well as a draft copy of the minutes, stating the
Board's decision which became effective the date of the meeting, July 24, 2003. This variance shall
automatically expire within one hundred eighty (180) days of the date it was granted, January 20,
2004, unless a building permit has been submitted.
The City of
Wheat
Mark & Julie Bymaster
Page 2
August 14, 2003
Please feel free to contact me at (303) 235-2846 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Kathy Field
Administrative Assistant
Enclosures: Certificate of Resolution
Draft of Minutes
cc: WA-03-15 (case file)
Building File
CADocuments and Set ings\kathyWy Documents\Kathy\BOA\CORRESM003\wa03l5approval.wpd
D
CASE NO: WA-03-15 CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTION C > 00
APPLICANT'S NAME: Mark and Julie Bymaster
LOCATION: 3295 Fenton Street
WHEREAS, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and
WHEREAS, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-03-15 is an appeal to this Board
from the decision of an administrative officer; and
WHEREAS, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law, and in recognition
that there were no protests registered against it; and
WHEREAS, the relief applied for may be granted without detriment to the public welfare and
without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing the City of
Wheat Ridge.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Board of Adjustment Application Case No.
WA-03-15 be, and hereby is, APPROVED.
TYPE OF VARIANCE: A 5-foot side yard setback variance from the 10-foot side yard setback
requirement for a two-story structure on property zoned Residential-One C (R-1C) and located at
3295 Fenton Street.
FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
The two-story addition directly abuts closely only a few feet of the existing dwelling on
the property immediately adjoining on the south.
2. The architect has made an effort to design an addition that is compatible aesthetically
with the existing structure and is not incompatible with the existing neighborhood.
3. Structural considerations within the existing foundation prohibit the addition of a second
story to the existing foundation.
4. The second story addition will be minimally visible from the street as it occurs primarily
in the core of the structure. The proposed wood siding on the first floor will not be
significantly visible from the street view.
5_ Testimony was given by some adjacent neighbors in favor of the variance.
6. Staff recommended approval of the variance.
Board of Adjustment
Resolution No. WA-03-15
Page two (2)
VOTE: YES: ABBOTT, BLAIR, ECHELMEYER, HOVLAND, HOWARD,
PETERSON, SCHULZ
NO: DRDA
DISPOSITION: A request for a 5-foot side yard setback variance from the 10-foot side yard
setback requirement for a two-story structure on property zoned Residential-One C (R-1 Q and
located at 3295 Fenton Street was APPROVED.
ADOPTED and made effective this 24th day of July. 2003.
Pa Dr a, air
Board of Adjustment
Ann Lazzeri, ecretar
Board of Adjustment
B. Case No. WA-03-15: An application filed by Mark and Julie Bymaster for
approval of a 5-foot side yard setback variance from the 10-foot side yard setback
requirement for a two-story structure on property zoned Residential-One C (R-
1 C) and located at 3295 Fenton Street.
This case was presented by Mary Austin. She entered all pertinent documents into the
record which were accepted by Chair DRDA. She advised the Board there was
jurisdiction to hear the case and reviewed the staff report and digital presentation. Staff
recommended approval of the case for reasons outlined in the staff report.
Ms. Austin entered into the record a letter received the morning of the Board's meeting
from Sharon Maez, 3285 Fenton, whose property abuts the applicant's property to the
north. The letter indicated support for the application.
In response to a question from Board Member HOVLAND, Ms. Austin explained that the
applicant could "pop the top" on the existing structure without a variance. However, the
foundation of the existing structure would not support a second story. The staff report
stated that "if the proposed addition were to conform to required setbacks, the additional
living space would be located ten feet from the property line and the attached garage
located on the five-foot setback line. This would create an undesirable staggered wall
effect." The R-1 C zone district is the only district that requires a 5-foot minimum
setback for the first story and an additional 5 feet for each story.
In response to a question from Board Member ABBOTT, Ms. Austin explained that
because the applicants are located to the north of their neighbors, there would be less
impact to light and shadow on the neighbors.
Board Member ECHELMEYER asked how this situation came to staffs attention. Ms.
Austin explained that it came to light during the building permit review process.
In response to a question from Board Member ABBOTT, Ms. Austin explained that the
staggered wall effect produced by an additional 5-foot setback for the second story would
be an undesirable situation for the applicant rather than the city.
Jim Nienaber
Evergreen, CO
Mr. Nienaber, architect for the applicant, was sworn in by Chair DRDA. Regarding the
turning radius into the garage from the alley, he stated that an 18-foot wide garage door is
planned to give more swing radius into the garage.
Board Member ABBOTT expressed concern about the aesthetic compatibility of the
addition in that the existing house is brick and the addition will be covered with siding.
Mr. Nienaber explained that the existing house and the addition will be painted the same
Board of Adjustment
07/24/03
painted the same color. He further explained that siding was planned in order to meet
budget constraints. Architectural details on the addition, such as windows, are planned to
match the existing house.
Chair DRDA asked if there were those present who wished to address this matter. The
following individuals responded:
Patricia Wyland Ladwick
5825 West 33rd
Ms. Ladwick was sworn in by Chair DRDA. She spoke in favor of her neighbor's
application and stated that the planned addition is in keeping with the unique flavor of the
neighborhood.
Mark Bymaster
3295 Fenton Street
Mark Bymaster, the applicant, was swom in by Chair DRDA. He stated their desire was
to provide additional living space that would maintain the character of the house. Many
options were investigated and the proposed addition proved to be the most satisfactory.
Julie Bymaster
3295 Fenton Street
Julie Bymaster, the applicant, was sworn in by Chair DRDA. She pointed out that the
proposed siding would be in character with new homes recently built on 33rd Avenue.
Barry McBride
5801 West 33rd Avenue
Mr. McBride was sworn in by Chair DRDA. He lives directly north across the street
from the applicant. He spoke in favor of the application which would be in keeping with
the diverse nature of the neighborhood. He felt the addition would be an enhancement to
the neighborhood. It also maximizes the landscaping that faces his house. It is also
consistent with other homes in the neighborhood that have "pop-tops" with five-foot
setbacks. He believed a ten-foot setback for the second story would create a
"hodgepodge" effect in the neighborhood.
There were no others present who wished to address this matter.
Board Member DRDA expressed concern that there is a self-imposed hardship because
there are other ways to create additional space without a variance.
Board Member PETERSON commented that R-1 C is the only zone district that requires
an additional setback for each story.
Board Member HOVLAND indicated that he was in favor of the application and
commented that a pop-top would have a greater impact on the house to the south than the
Board of Adjustment Page 3
07/24/03
proposed application. He also commented that he was very familiar with this
neighborhood and appreciated its diverse architectural nature. He also pointed out that
the corner lot presents setback limitations.
Board Member BLAIR favored the application. He commented that if the view were
taken that the ordinance must be followed as stated, there would be no need for the Board
of Adjustment. He felt it was the Board's function to decide whether the application was
out of character and harmful to the community or whether it was an enhancement to the
community.
Board Member ABBOTT commented that, while there are more "cut and dried"
hardships, he agreed with Board Member BLAIR.
Board Member PETERSON stated that, while he believed there were other alternatives
available to the applicant, he would vote to approve the application because the neighbors
were in favor of the application.
Board Member SCHULZ stated that he believed the proposed addition was a wise and
attractive way to add square footage to the house and is in keeping with other houses in
the neighborhood. He commented that increasing the height of the house would look
awkward.
Upon a motion by Board Member ABBOTT and second by Board Member
HOWARD, the following resolution was stated:
Whereas, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and
Whereas, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-03-15 is an appeal to this
Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and
Whereas, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law; and in
recognition that there were no protests registered against it;
Whereas, the relief applied for MAY be granted without detriment to the public
welfare and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the
regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge.
Now, therefore, be it resolved that Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-
03-15 be, and hereby is, APPROVED.
Type of Variance: A 5-foot side yard setback variance from the 10-foot side yard
setback requirement for a two-story structure on property zoned Residential-One C
(R-1C) and located at 3295 Fenton Street.
Board of Adjustment Page 4
07/24/03
For the following reasons:
1. The two-story addition directly abuts closely only a few feet of the existing
dwelling on the property immediately adjoining on the south.
2. The architect has made an effort to design an addition which is compatible
aesthetically with the existing structure and is compatible with the existing
neighborhood.
3. Structural considerations within the existing foundation prohibit the addition
of a second story to the existing foundation.
4. The second story addition will be minimally visible from the street as it
occurs primarily in the core of the structure. The proposed wood siding on
the first floor would not be significantly visible from the street view.
5. Testimony was given by some adjacent neighbors in favor of the variance.
6. Staff recommended approval of the variance.
The motion passed 7-1 with Board Member DRDA voting no.
Chair DRDA advised the applicants that their request for variance was approved.
C. Case No. WA-03-16: An application filed by ARC Wireless Solutions for
approval of a variance to Section 26-709 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws (Sign
Code) to allow an increase to the maximum sign area allowed for a freestanding
sign on property zoned Planned Industrial Development (PID) and located at
10601 West I-70 Frontage Road North.
This case was presented by Mike Pesicka. He entered all pertinent documents into the
record which were accepted by Chair DRDA. He advised the Board there was
jurisdiction to hear the case and reviewed the staff report and digital presentation. Staff
recommended denial of the case for reasons outlined in the staff report.
In response to a question from Chair DRDA, Mr. Pesicka stated that if the variance were
denied, the lower portion of the sign would have to be removed.
In response to a question from Board Member HOWARD, Mr. Pesicka stated that the
present sign is 216 square feet and 173 square feet is allowed under the code.
Board Member ABBOTT asked if the code would allow the subject sign to be raised to
50 feet in height. Mr. Pesicka explained that while the previous business was limited to
having a sign 32.5 feet in height, the present business could legally raise the height of the
sign to 50 feet.
Board Member PETERSON commented that the applicant would have had no way of
knowing the sign code had changed and that the existing sign was not in compliance.
Board of Adjustment
07/24/03
Q
~~95E (.rJfl-03-/
PUBLIC HEARING ROSTER
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
*J X92./) d F /(I DJ ~ ~ BAIT
7-a5~ o~
2 TUL(~
3a9~ ~E.,v ~a
c U CA
Na µ
(Please Print)
Address
d Gw
in Favor/Opposed
VjAwk
32`5 F~nfTa~( s~
-c~~fYt/®~G
bz
0
0
CD
N
0
W
0
W
O
O
CD
r+
J
N
-P
O
W
It
r
CfQ
tz
0
°a
~o
~a W
N ~
O
W
O
cn 2)
O
■ ■
0
rMIL n O
CD 2)
cD - h
.O ZO ,
(D ~ O
(D O
(D rMIL
m
r,,L O (1).
I
O O CD
O
rmIL
C
O CD W
Q) rMIL
rMIL
O
CL o
T
(p F 125.cb,
r
0
Z
Y
i
o
t25.ce~
s
s,
=D'
s
m U"
o L~"
~ o
w
0
w
77.
t
-
W
W
~o
W
m
N ~
O
W
t~
i•
r'
_e
l
T.
p ft
rr~
F
I~
l~
f
~4-,
\\I N
I
f~l
i
i
I~
A
I1~,I
'III "i
ul
II i
L
I
N
0
i
t
t~
O
•J
Cd
0
w
Y o
p, w
~ Cn
m
0
w
r-r-
m
MZ
O
e~-r
e•-r
O
CD
CD
O. W
51
CC
•J
c ~
•J
O
C
OM
0
CD
rD
rot
e•t
n ~r
O ~
O
rte.
~Q
O
01
n
:6~
CD
CD
CD
•J
tJ) r+ tU O
~ O. O N Q O CD -0
-1 CD
CD
O O
Cv N O O N
:3 - CD
Z3 zr
Z3 0
o - O
o y O w• X CD O CD =
> CD Z3 CD
12(n r-l- _0 :3 CD ZD
N
CD 0
CD O r- f-
cn CD
CD 3 p CD
O O :
:3 < w CD O0 to
CD zr CD X = r+ O
CD r' (Q CD CD cr_
(n- 0 Z3 Cr CD (n ~ 00 CD
O - CD
CD p T ~
l< 0 C: =3
(n :3 (a W CD
~G
CD w ;7
0 r-4- (n CD
Z3 0
~
~
0
CD
CD
0
0
3
o
3
~
~A
M
o
o
roL
ii
'A
vI
D
w
~
o
T
V
w
0
D
r
0
m
v : (f of ~JNZ qT R io GF- /646AI~o Or AL)j-OJ7'1fl. ~
I (LoM, ~/ZAD Avo &,An-o~) ~IAFi22
a ~r~s Fz N ;o -0 sT
u~- a3~° 5F616-
1W, 3),S S J 6,) Sr,
Qo4~, Al F-/Li '
WE A2f TNf O1,inr,F2j Of i4L /0h0/0 ,ay Q t s
ST s14
4A j
,7 ~i SovT)4
ui°~n7y ~~~L aF 3 ass f5 rra sr. Gun /s T~~~ o ✓c y
l~ous~ ~~~aT SHo~c.~-1 ~ ~°~q,~n.T~ Ci~~ ~✓i7e 3LSs F~7o~ ~7,
6r~~Sc7/ ~,J 7o Till 2£4uzs7- -~rjggT o
Fl vE fur S~ 4gCi< ~~Lo Doti Tdz /J`w,oasl, ~Wu
Y76IL1 S`rn &(27' L/,,Z -fm; l/S uA c 7~~ r wr-
Nei/<' 7
N "
ow UA~uEl i~ 7 z Rr~fa A % ~qj ~F~n r/
L S v~
wn'w [x✓~ ✓AZiq,✓c~j f 7k~ ciT
Try 91 roc r~~ lVX16111joIg Z~6 No; oa Lcr 7
iG9G/~
`y-e~
7`o2
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT
TO: Board of Adjustment
DATE OF MEETING: July 24, 2003 DATE PREPARED: July 18, 2003
CASE NO. & NAME: WA-03-15/Bymaster
CASE MANAGER: Mary Austin
ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a 5-foot side yard setback variance from the 10-foot
side yard setback requirement for a two-story structure.
LOCATION OF REQUEST: 3295 Fenton Street
NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT (S): Julie and Mark Bymaster
3295 Fenton Street
Wheat Ridge, CO 80215
NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER (S): same
APPROXIMATE AREA:
PRESENT ZONING:
9,375 square feet (.215 Acres)
Residential-One C (R-1C)
PRESENT LAND USE: Single Family Residential
SURROUNDING ZONING: N S E & W: Residential-One C
SURROUNDING LAND USE: N S E & W: Single Family Residential
DATE PUBLISHED: July 10, 2003
DATE POSTED: July 10, 2003
DATE LEGAL NOTICES SENT: July 10, 2003
ENTER INTO THE RECORD:
(X)
CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS
(X)
ZONING ORDINANCE
O
SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS
(X)
EXHIBITS
O
OTHER
JURISDICTION:
The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements
have been met, therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case.
I. REQUEST
The property in question is located at 3295 Fenton Street, and is currently a single family
residence. The property is zoned Residential-One C (Exhibit 1, Zoning Map).
The applicant and owner, Julie Bymaster, is requesting approval of a 5-foot side yard setback
variance from the 10-foot side yard setback requirement for a two-story structure, resulting in a
5-foot side yard setback.
II. SITE PLAN
The applicant has submitted a letter of request outlining the reasons for the variance. (Exhibit 2,
Letter of Request) The applicant is proposing an addition onto the rear of the existing single
family home. The existing residence is currently situated 5 feet from the south (side yard)
property line. (Exhibit 3, Survey) The plan proposes a 2-story addition of living space onto the
existing home and an attached garage joined to that new living space. (Exhibit 4, Site Plan)
(Exhibit 5, Elevations)
The R-1C zone district requires a 5-foot minimum setback for the first story and 5 feet for each
additional story.
As a single story structure, the current 5-foot side yard setback is conforming. Based on the 5-
foot per story setback requirement, the 2-story portion of the addition is subject to a 10-foot
setback, while the attached garage portion of the addition is subject only to a 5-foot setback
requirement.
If the proposed addition were to conform to the required setbacks, the additional living space
would be located 10 feet from the property line and the attached garage located on the 5 foot
setback line. This would create an undesirable staggered wall effect. The applicant is seeking to
construct the entire addition in line with the established 5-foot setback.
Staff has received no objection to or public comment regarding this variance request thus far.
III. VARIANCE CRITERIA
Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a variance request:
1. Can the property in question yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if
permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in
which it is located?
If the request is denied, the property may still receive a reasonable return in use. The
property is currently utilized as a single family residence, and this use may continue,
regardless of the outcome of this variance request. However, it is unknown whether an
addition could be designed to accommodate the varying setback line.
2. If the variance were granted, would it alter the essential character of the locality?
Board of Adjustment
WA-03-15IBymaster
If the variance were granted, the character of the locality would not be altered. This is an
older area of the City in which lot size and age and types of structures vary. The Building
Dept. records verify that there is a 2-story structure constructed within 5-feet of the north
property line (side yard) at 3265 Fenton St.
The character of the locality is much more likely to altered if the addition to the existing
home is constructed with varying setbacks.
The R-1C zoning district is the only residential zoning district that has a side yard setback
requirement that increases with additional stories for one-family dwellings. A second story
addition onto an existing single story structure ("pop-top") would not require relocating the
foundation to increase the setback. Therefore, any type of "pop-top" could result in a two-
story structure on the 5-foot setback line.
3. Does the particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the
specific property involved result in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner)
as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were
carried out?
The lot does not have a unique shape or a unique topographical condition. The lot, being a
corner lot, is subject to a minimum 30-foot setback along both Fenton St. and W 33rd Ave.
With the required setbacks along street frontages, the rear of the existing home is the only
viable location for an addition.
4. Has the alleged difficulty or hardship been created by any person presently having an
interest in the property?
The existing zoning district, with the required setbacks, was in place at the time the
property was purchased by the applicant. However, the applicant did not establish the
current location of the home on the 5-foot setback line. The applicant simply wishes to
build in line with the existing structure.
5. Would the granting of the variance be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located,
by, among other things, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent
property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing the
danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or substantially diminishing or
impairing property values within the neighborhood?
The property currently accommodates a single family home and this will not change with
this variance request. Therefore, the request would not increase congestion in public streets
nor would it be detrimental to the public's welfare or endanger public safety. Since the
variance would apply to the 2-story portion of the addition, the request could potentially
impact the light an air to the adjacent property. The proposed addition may well aid in
increasing the property values of the neighborhood.
Board of Adjustment
WA-03-15IBymaster
6. If criteria 1 through 5 are found, then, would the granting of the variance result in a
benefit or contribution to the neighborhood or the community, as distinguished from
an individual benefit on the part of the applicant, or would granting of the variance
result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities?
The proposed addition could potentially provide a benefit to the neighborhood with the
increased value of the residence when construction is complete. The request would not
result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities.
IV. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff concludes that the above criteria are supportive of the variance request. There is a unique
situation involving existing structures and additions and the application of an increasing setback
per story requirement of the R-1C zoning district. Utilizing a varying setback line for a single
family structure could potentially impact the character of the area more than the requested
variance. Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL for the following reasons:
1. The character of the locality will not be altered.
2. The character of the neighborhood is more likely to be altered if the addition
is constructed with varying setbacks.
3. The applicant did not create a hardship by establishing the current location of
the residence.
Board of Adjustment
WA-03-I5IBymaster
5E 24
J l ~I ~I al MI M Al zil -.I V l Al AI AI ^I 1 I AI AI AI 1 at at W dl J
q
N
I
.I
FK
.I
D L.
il ~l
Nil 11 11
11
1
3]50
„
^n
~
~
3]45
w
3]3]
5
LL
3Tb
3Ydl
3>IS
~
~
$
~
3]W
A
n
TM
5E 25
i
DEPARTMENTOF
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
OFFICIAL
ZONING MAP
WHEAT RIDGE
COLORADO
- PARCEULOT BOUNDARY
(DESIGNATES OWNERSHIP)
WATER FEATURE
* DENOTES MULTIPLE ADDRESSES
100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN
(APPROXIMATE LOCATION)
NE 25
0 00 200 900 400 %m
MAP ADOPTED: June 15,1994
Last Revision: September 10, 2
L
Mark and Julie Byinaster
3295 Fenton Street
Wheat Ridge, CO 80212
City of Wheat Ridge
Community Development Department
Board of Adjustment
7500 W. 29th Avenue
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Judy 3, 2003
Dear Members,
We are requesting a variance to allow a second story addition that will align with the existing
structure. The existing home has a 5 foot set-back from the property line on the south. Another
home at 3265 Fenton St., only three houses from ours, already has established a precedence in the
neighborhood with a two story addition on a similar set-back.
The neighborhood is an eclectic one. There is a mix of homes ranging from the original early 1900
era farmhouse across the street, to the newer homes to the northwest of our property that were built
in the early 1990's. Most of the homes to our immediate east, south and west were built between
1930 and 1960. There is a wide variety of home styles, lot sizes, and set-backs within this mixture
of older and newer properties.
Our home, built in 1948, is located on the southwest corner of 33rd and Fenton across from
Panorama Park. It has two bedrooms, one bathroom, a partial basement, and a one car garage.
The improvements we propose would contain a family room. a much more efficient laundry room,
a two car garage, and an upstairs bedroom with an additional bathroom. This plan would fiirther
free space in the existing structure to create a larger, more accommodating dining room. a 1/2 bath,
and pantry space in the kitchen. These improvements should greatly increase the value of the home
and put it within a competitive price range of the newer homes across the street on 33rd. The
addition is carefully planned to blend with the existing home and to enhance the aesthetics of the
neighborhood by attempting to minimize the "tacked-on" look of many similar additions.
Since 1995 when we purchased the property, we have considered many options to improve the
space within our home. We considered the unfinished cellar-like basement, but a low ceiling and
lack of appropriate egress windows makes it cost prohibitive to add a bedroom. Therefore, if we
ever moved, we could not sell the home claiming a third bedroom because of these existing
limitations. We also considered converting the one car garage to a master bedroom, but the space
is narrow and would not easily accommodate a second bathroom. The room also would have to be
accessed through the small existing laundry room. These solutions might improve our space
problems, but do not significantly improve the value of the home if it ever was sold. We concluded
that the best solution for us would be an addition.
The neighbors directly impacted by any addition we would build, either one or two story, are at
3285 Fenton St. They are immediately to our south and also have a 5 foot set-back from their
property line. They are aware of our plans and have verbally told us they have no issues over
them. We have been careful to preserve their privacy by limiting windows on the first floor (which
EXHIBIT 2
will look out onto a co-planned solid fence) and by plamning only one window to the south on the
second floor. This window will be a privacy window, necessary only for the light of the southern
exposure
Since February, we have worked extensively with an architect and a structural engineering firm to
come up with a plan that is simple, yet accommodates what is considered to be the minimum
requirements in today's expectations for a family home. In the process, we found that corner lots
have more limitations with setback than we first realized. hi our case, these limitations are further
compounded by the small size of the lot and the structure and layout of the existing home. We
could not go directly up with a "popped top" because of foundation concerns. We could not build
north because of the proximity of the street. We could not extend more than five feet to the front of
the home on the east for similar reasons. The south already had only 5 feet to the property line, so
our only option is to build to the west. However, because of the alley on that side there was a ten
foot setback requirement so we had to carefully plan the space for a shallow garage as well as the
living space needed. The layout of the existing home creates access difficulties from the old home
into the addition. Therefore, the most logical flow into the addition restricts the new structure from
being extended past the southern third of the existing house on the west side. We also were
mindful of staying within the required percentage ratio of the structure to the small lot size.
Despite conversations with the city about the difficulties inherent on a corner lot with an alley, we
inadvertently missed the information about set-backs for an addition with a second story and
proceeded with a plan that incorporated the set-back to the existing structure. Because of the
design of the existing home, it is not a matter of simply moving everything over 5 more feet. This
option would not only destroy a bay window in the room intended to become the dining room, it
may create additional and costly roof and structural issues. If we reduce the existing plan by 5 feet
it eliminates the laundry room. If we keep the laundry room as planned, then the loss of 5 feet
greatly reduces the size of the family room/living room. The family roornAiving room plan already
is on the small side of what is typical for most homes built today and reducing it further would
make it smaller than the room we use for that purpose now in the existing home.
At this point, a complete redesign would be a difficult option for us. With the set-back limitations
of a comer lot and some of the other difficulties created by its narrow size, and the restrictions
within the existing structure, the intent of the addition may be compromised. More importantly,
we have already invested a great deal of time and money into this project, and the cost of starting
over or making extensive changes may be prohibitive for our budget.
It has been an unfortunate and frustrating error. However, because of the time and financial
investment we have already made, because of issues with the lot and existing stricture, and
because ours would not be the first home in the neighborhood to have an exception to the two
story, ten foot set-back, we would like to proceed with this plan and ask for a variance that will
allow a second story addition that aligns to the 5 foot setback of the existing structure.
Thank you
S cer
an t a d Julie Bymaster
FREMONT 7875
PARKER D. SHEPPERD
41544
- CIVIL ENGINEER.
1657 MONROE STREFT
DENVER6. COLORADO
-
July 16, 13 95 8. Yf! 33 YE..
~
i
h
110
u
1 Sty
Lot 1 Brk y
Res N
l~
h
Shaklee Sub.
\
i
The Central Bank and Trust Co. Curry
CERTIFICATE: SURVEY 13687>
I hereby certify that this plat is a true
and accurate record of my survey on July 16y 19-48., of,
Lot 1, Shaklee A Subdivision, Jefferson County
Colorado,
EXCEPT the Rear 7J feet thereof,
and shows the location of major improvements and that
said improvements are located within the boundary lines
of the above described prop shown hereon.
Registered ngine
EXHIBIT 3
151 Au~Y
P
d
I
•ri8` w1~E
cow. O iA
~9fo`-lu.
Oe ud
1
~ C~aE!e
1
1.
I
~.AOI Tb 1,1
T
O QaEAMF1G8
_I__-l r--J
® tot: i
L 1
~tl
1.51
I
- 10
i
1
FATIO
5i 9•g! 711
I
I e~cts3nr~~ f2~sweNC.E
I
I
1 Q LOT V-ze : 9315
v puu rAt je aka 1 2ti
N oho cdJER~ ~io%
1
Y
SITE rLdtl
NI
r
1
I
w
I
Ill
1 Q
i L
w
1
~P~~ 111°101 ~
1
L'OT 1 1
C,KA4LLr,e su~•olvlsla.l
'15.001
FEQT0 J sTP-0MT
EXHIBIT 4
,f
(f
f
T
17
i
L
O
Z
f
3
POSTING CERTIFICATION
CASE NO. -
PLANNING COMMISSION/ CITY COUNC F/ BN OARD OF ADJUS Circle One)
HEARING DATE: 2bb7
I, Mark 6yyn s ~e,I-
(n in e)
residing at 3295 Fs 1 tto'rC -Vre
(address)
as the applicant for Case No. - ~3-1 ~ , hereby certify that I have posted the Notice of
Public Hearing at v qs k&-6 S
(location)
on this 2 day of `I u M L , 20_0,j_, and do hereby certify that
said sign has been posted and remained in place for fifteen (15) days prior to and including the
scheduled day of public hearing of this case. The sign was posted in the position shown on the
map below.
Signature: 4ft
NOTE: This form must be submitted at the public hearing on this case and will be placed in the
applicant's case file at the Community Development Department.
e:\planning\fonns\postingcert
Rev. 1/1/03
V-0,f
MAP
es 1 i-,, 4')
r-C4nfa'yC. -5+
N--~
GU , 03 51,Sy`n e;-s lze,-- *G
# 1 ' MetroScan / Jefferson
Owner :Fischer Robert W Jr Schedule :023534
Site :3260 Gray St Wheat Ridge 80212 7003 0500 0004 7661 0902
Mail :3260 Gray St Wheat Ridge Co 80212
LandUse :11120res,Improved Land Res,Improved Land Price :$22,400,032
TaxDist - OwnerPh
Bedrm:768 Bth:448.00 YE: Parking:-1280 Firepl:768 TotArea:280,064 Ac:
# 2 MetroScan / Jefferson
Owner :Bymaster Mark/Julie A Schedule :024175 r
Site :3295 Fenton St Wheat Ridge 80212 7003 0500 0004 7661 0919
Mail :3295 Fenton St Wheat Ridge Co 80212
LandUse :11120res,Improved Land Res,Improved Land Price :$32
TaxDist OwnerPh .
Bedrm:768 Bth:256.00 YB: Parking:-1280 Firepl:256 TotArea:311,296 Ac:
# 3 Met=Scan / Jefferson '
Owner :Fabrizio George R Schedule :024435
Site :3280 Gray St Wheat Ridge 80212 7003 0500 0004 7661 0926
Mail :3280 Gray St Wheat Ridge Co 80212
LandUse :11120res,Improved Land Res,Improved Land Price :$32
TaxDist OwnerPh .
Bedrm: Bth:256.00 YB: Parking:-1280 Firepl:256 TotArea:292,096 Ac:
# 4 ' MetroScan / Jefferson '
Owner :Floyd Dennis Roy Schedule :024503
Site :3265 Fenton St Wheat Ridge 80212 7003 0500 0004 7661 0933
Mail :3265 Fenton St Wheat Ridge Co 80212
LandUse :11120res,Improved Land Res,Improved Land Price :$32
TaxDist OwnerPh
Bedrm: Bth:384.01 YB: Parking:-1536 Firepl:256 TotArea:852,992 Ac:
# 5 : Metr Jefferson •
Owner :Gordon James B/Lenette S Schedule :02465n
Site :3270 Gray St Wheat Ridge 802 7003 0500 0004 7661 0940
Mail :3270 Gray St Wheat Ridge Co 02
LandUse :11120res,Improved Land Res, mp o L Price :$32
TaxDist OwnerPh
Bedrm: Bth:256.00 YB: Park' g:_ 1 Firepl:512 TotArea:267,776 Ac:
# 6 : MetroScan / Jefferson
Owner :Jaryno Robert Schedule :024979
Site :3265 Gray St Denver 80212 7003 0500 0004 7661 0957
Mail :3265 Gray St Denver Co 80212
LandUse :11120res,Improved Land Res,Improved Land Price :$32
TaxDist OwnerPh
Bedrm: Bth:256.00 YB: Parking: Firepl: TotArea:252,672 Ac:
# 7 MetroScan / Jefferson '
Owner :Maerz Howard B Schedule :025067
Site :3285 Fenton St Wheat Ridge- 80212 7003 0500 0004 7661 0964
Mail :3285 Fenton St Wheat Ridge Co 80212
LandUse :1112Ores,Improved Land Res,Improved Land Price :$32
TaxDist OwnerPh
Bedrm:512 Bth:256.00 YB: Parking:-1280 Firepl:256 TotArea:262,144 Ac:
# 6 : MetroScan / Jefferson •
Owner :Henkel Darren Schedule :025965
Site :3275 Fenton St Wheat Ridge 80212 7003 0500 0004 7661 0971
Mail :3275 Fenton St Wheat Ridge Co 80212
LandUse :11120res,Improved Land Res,Improved Land Price :$32
TaxDist OwnerPh .
Bedrm:768 Bth:448.00 YB: Parking:-1536 Firepl: TotArea:413,184 Ac:
# 9 : MetroScan / Jefferson '
Owner :Mcbride Beth Schedule :025990 11 Site :5801 W 33rd Ave Wheat Ridge 80212 7003 0500 0004 7661 0988
Mail :5801 W 33rd Ave Wheat Ridge Cc 80212
LandUse. :11121]res,Improved Land Res,Improved Land Price :$32
TaxDist OwnerPh
Bedrm: Bth:256.00 YB: Parking:-1536 Firepl:256 TotArea:386,560 Ac:.
Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations
or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report.
# 10 : MetroScan / Jefferson :
Owner :Castro Rudolph F Trust Schedule :026143 ^n
Site :3295 Gray St Wheat Ridge 80212 7003 0500 0004 7661 0995
Mail :3295 Gray St Wheat Ridge Co 80212
LandUse :11120res,Improved Land Res,Improved Land Price :$32
TaxDist OwnerPh
Bedrm: Bth:576.01 YB: Parking:-1280 Firepl:256 TotArea:535,296 Ac:
# 11 : MetroScan / Jefferson •
Owner :Ladwig Patricia R Schedule :026773
Site :5825 W 33rd Ave Wheat Ridge 80212 7003 0500 0004 7661 1008
Mail :5825 W 33rd Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80212
LandUse :11120res,Improved Land Res,Improved Land rice :$32
Tax Dist OwnerPh .
Bedrm: Bth:256.00 YB: Parking:-1280 Firepl:512 TotArea:345,856 Ac:'
# 12 MetroScan / Jefferson •
Owner :Steinkruger Dale Schedule :026836
Site :3285 Gray St Denver 80212 ' is nnti
Mail :3285 Gray St Denver Co 80212 7003 0500 0004 7661 1015
LandUse :11120res,Improved Land Res,Improved Land Price ,
Tax Dist OwnerPh
Bedrm:768 Bth:384.01 YB: Parking:-1280 Firepl:256 TotArea:423,168 Ac:
# 13 : MetroScan / Jefferson :
Owner :Claus Carol J Schedule :187476
Site :3481 Benton St #6 wheat Ridge 80212 7003^0500 0004 7661 1022
Mail :PO Box 12410 Denver Co 80212
LandUse :11140res,Townhomes,Improved Land Res,Townhomes, mproved Land,032
TaxDist OwnerPh .
Bedrm:512 Bth:384.01 YB: Parking: Firepl:256 TotArea:243,200 Ac:
# 14 : MetroScan / Jefferson •
Owner :Jefferson County Schedule :195617
Site :3400 Fenton St Wheat Ridge 80212 7003 0500 0004 7661 1039
Mail :1700 Arapahoe St Golden Co 80419
LandUse :91390exempt,County,Land Exempt,County,Land Price :$32
TaxDist OwnerPh
Bedrm: Bth: YB: Parking: Firepl: TotArea: Ac:
# 15 MetroScan / Jefferson •
Owner :Anderson Craig Schedule :410905
Site :5845 W 33rd Ave Wheat Ridge 80212 7003 0500 0004 7661 1046
Mail :5845 W 33rd Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80212
LandUse :11120res,Improved Land Res,Improved Land Price :$38,576,672
TaxDist OwnerPh .
Bedrm:768 Bth:576.01 YB: Parking:-1280 Firep1:256 TotArea:489,728 Ac:
# 16 : MetroScan / Jefferson •
Owner :Walz Kelvin R Schedule :410906
Site :5885 W 33rd Ave Wheat Ridge 80212 Pa 7003 0500 0004 7661 1053
Mail :5885 W 33rd Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80212 X1 LandUse :11120res,Improved Land Res,Improved Land Price :$38,492,192
TaxDist OwnerPh .
Bedrm:768 Bth:448.00 YB: Parking:-1280 Firepl:256 TotArea:453,888 Ac:
Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations
or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report.
7500 West 29th Avenue
The City of
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Wheat Ridge
Telephone 303/235-2846
FAX 303/235-2857
July 10, 2003
Dear Property Owner:
This is to inform you of Case No. WA-03-15 which is a request for approval of a 5 foot side yard
setback variance from the 10 foot side yard setback requirement for a two-story structure on
property zoned Residential-One C (R-IC) and located at 3295 Fenton Street. This case will
heard by the Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment in the Council Chambers of the Municipal
Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue on July 24, 2003, at 7:30 p.m.
As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or
submit written comments.
If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at
303-235-2846. Thank you.
Planning Division.
CADocuments and Set ings\kathyWy Documents\Katby\BOA\pubnotice\2003\wa03I5.wpd
* Search Parameters
* Jefferson (CO)
* 7/9/2003
* 2:24 PM
Parcel
Number ...18
39
251
17
013
39
251
17
014
39
251
17
011
39
251
17
012
39
251
00
044
39
251
14
003
39
251
14
004
39
251
14
005
39
251
19
001
39
251
19
002
39
251
19
003
39
251
19
015
39
251
19
014
39
251
19
013
39
251
19
012
39
251
18
007
39
251
18
006
39
251
18
005
16
65'
5
(PARK)
55 45 y9 9
to
II
12
1.-60, 77 10
00
44
8 -0 0 H I
G H
S
13 14
c
m 006 005
~
°o m 17
C
2_ 96 1'
65'
_ v
N N
t
LL
007 6507' 6500
51.06
p04 003 002 001
60' 60'
77
439M A R• E T
A
6814
6-C I7 6-B
5$ 4 m 3
2
m
I o
c
SUB
- 011 012 v
p D- 017 016 015
014 013
4
i
75' 100'
2 j
JEFFCO
209-473
JEFF
CO
209
-473
O
209 -473
140.4
5
32.3
19 16
132.3
1
25
23'
.
14
75
10
_
O
0 003
I -D
1-8
007 m
001
015
20
HA
02
06 6
® 15
014 2
0 c 004
001
10
I
AND
3
2A
'
2-C
013
00
023
7
14
'
'
005
003
50
SD
CO,
ti
S
B
U)
4
012
06
28
8
13
0 L I N G E R
it
300'
05 ~n
18
SHAKLE
SUB 5
3
C
'
°
140 4
ou
-
07
~
0
12
0
N
`
c~
~
005
6
2n
d I
010
4
I1
48
5D
5-C I 5-C
ti
o6
7
19
oos
I
j
5
'
pg
•1•F
"0
°n
Om
-
10
07
132.5'
4•A
009
2T
012
1
014 1014
o
4-E
4
D
9-A
F
-
EATRIDGE F0402346
8
j~574
8"B
0
M44066t
1325
100'
21'
100
1 '
.
.
50.1
ATRIDGE F0402347
W
32
nd
. Ave.
i
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT on July 24, 2003, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Municipal Building at 7500 West 291h Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested citizens
are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. The following petition:
shall be heard:
Case No. WA-03-15: An application filed by Mark and Julie Bymaster for approval of a
5 foot side yard setback variance from the 10 foot side yard setback requirement for a
two-story structure on property zoned Residential-One C (R-1C) and located at 3295
Fenton Street.
Case No. WA-03-16: An application filed by ARC Wireless Solutions for approval of a
variance to Section 26-709 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws (Sign Code) to allow an
increase to the maximum sign area allowed for a freestanding sign on property zoned
Planned Industrial Development (PID) and located at 10601 West I-70 Frontage Road
North.
Kathy Field, Administrative Assistant
ATTEST:
Wanda Sang, City Clerk
To be published: Wheat Ridge Transcript
Date: July 10, 2003
40NE4.
A, LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION
Community Development Department
7500 West 29"' Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Phone (303) 235-2846
1 O R AD(Please print or type all information)
Applicant e-&r o r Address 62g5 FPn4on r%. Phone303e7317-645/
CAYAAA n iiTdgo State CO Zip 8QZ I Z Fax -
Owner(~i Iu~if~ n3aSkr Address~F(f FPrt~{W 5~. PhoneL2D2),2- i go:5-1
City \r,\ poe. State CO Zip 8o7 -l Z Fax
(H)303-231- 8051
Contact NAQLrk i l TpY Address5,?JS Ie-rlon 4. PhontG)7zo-zV-1898
City mI 4 State C.o Zip 90017- Fax -
(The person listed as ntact will be contacted to answer questions regarding this application, provide additional information when necessary, post
public hearing signs, and will receive a copy of the staff report prior to Public Hearing.)
-on
Location of request (address): 7 Q 5 FP Yl4
Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request):
Application submittal requirements on reverse side
❑ Change of zone or zone conditions ❑ Special Use Permit
❑ Consolidation Plat ❑ Subdivision: Minor (5 lots or less)
❑ Flood Plain Special Exception ❑ Subdivision: Major (More than 5 lots)
❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Right of Way Vacation
❑ Planned Building Group ❑ Temporary Use, Building, Sign
❑ Site Development Plan approval ErVariance/Waiver (from Section 1~5 )
❑ Other:
Detailed description of request: ~QYience +6 Allot. A Sechnd 54-oo Clr'Adir~n -6
. e- IL41ex•.
1i wikh 4'he. P t4inG horrtp , Se- 4hrk e
Required information:
Assessors Parcel Number: Size of Lot (acres or square footage): q'315
Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning:
Current Use: Proposed Use:
I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge
and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above,
without whose consent the requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners
must submit power-of-a ney fro the ner which a ed of this action on his behalf.
A.
Signature of Applicant R~
cribed ~ sv~ptryp~e t}f~s ~ ~Cday of 20 03
' Gc c
to a_ cx~
A PUBLIfr otary Public
N dF'c' - y commission expires <//L~/,3
To be filled out by staff: MYCommission Expires 04/1 6120 0 6
Date received /d 3 Fee $ , ad ~ Receipt Nok~ r Case No.
A14-03-4-5:'
Comp Plan Desig. Zoning C Quarter Section Map
Related Case No. Pre-App Mtg. Date Case Manager
i
I
I
f
I
s ~ o
O
A %
I
o
Z
z
4 111 0
Q ~ CV
LL
y_1
8
z
~NIy
1Y
1
o
J
V-
4~.
40
~m
v~
i..,...L tStec my -
i
{yy X
~i
` V
]/~i ~
{''""yw
j1 1dL
{
p
~ i
a
g l' L U~'_._.
s
i
~I
irk
.1
I
F~&P@ RY
F y:.`
i
f~
~
~
as"
s;:
a
a~
OOFLTH
boo
m
0
12
0
O
O m0
O O
0
U'
n
0
A
Q
0 .
O'
0'
U4
}
F
Z
on
.0
.v
Z
O
w
W
W
10 W
N Z
LL. W
0
Oz0
O m
F
0-
w
It
W' t
K rl
V d 0 .~j T N 'F 0 y 4i
a 3 8 c 7 ~
I c ~ 3 mC m
G R o0 g ' .S n ti 'C N d gy .G y
I N q ~ ..G. S 3 y m d W d m
I N d C ~ D W _ F d❑ U °
gg v w ° ° w
O i o y a h M i0 N m o w° 00 . vv y 7
1 r-I F U J~ O F F ro G - q .5 7 v 04 O
3
M m O I o m R C U ~ w e w> .c ^ u m u y' ~ ~ p Uall o Z~
o W I U V
w
m G° S c o
44
9i > '0 'o c c m° w ° 3 m m N
p
z O F .ro. w .9t1
m q O p a S N d m .o S' F c ~A A m F y o o C
o. o U 'V [xWx~ O> .S m v° .S y d m m v ,3 c UU
w o w° 9 & N
m y W s~ 2 O O o v v a° w >
m w 'o UC C~ .0 O y J .o .`.3 0 .0 m Fi
0[a
O b 14 O w I •>7 m m G N❑ 9 9 F' n m w u N u O y A W
U ° I F .N G w y d GL~' V° m axi ~o v y
A U I m W y y O N _ Q G O W
pq rd
ti 4- Z
W 0 C v ° d i i a n n 'O .u m F 3 a m o, v v N
C :3 '9 I I B (d Cn :a n
,3 I I 'd m S a o y v A 'o - y
9
v v~ rn ° I a o C :3 ' c h o> a' w 'g rn
0 3 75 4
E~., Ra v awi c b 1 i 'd m o v c an d c"
N N N w U C' °O t5 y W Ga 7 0
Z V1 }a ~ }a O I I m _ U1 ~ ~ ,c ~ m v ° p Or m a°i m
v~I, v h 1J :S I I m~ w W 'v u .c " O 3 x a
N ~ ZP V1 G I I g N O w F. g w 9 n G .O W W m N ~ cMi
W }A O I N N A F ~tl d N y. 4 m
C4 m y C C O I I a v 3 v ° m tL
S v N
d o y d v ZQ
'O ,S3 N O I y N v m -N W
> pp w ti
N w I I IU M 'g Y y S d T O 4 Q 0~0 O S! N
v
a~ C Sa C C I I B Q o •o y a v a 't7 m F v p v 3
t8 -2
O v v o .ca I ° o a' w N m c d a G ` m Yn col
v to 11 W v w l I c w o v v° 3 o Q •o v e`b N sa v
,3r, N N ul N d C C .n G v c°i q •o v v° O~y ro g A C R o
L~ U W Oi W O L ,y 3 A O O E - y m I~ c v> m F r 4 ° N O N . •7.
N m W N v m i v 2 a. N~ c cc o y a°j O Q m m a w 3 a p 0 k 3
h r FD e"n I I V m v v w s' x ewn o N w w 3
Y. W H `o w i i v g o . -~~i w > 3 a F w m m v F FG N w 'c,
O 16 N y o I s o A 3 c w° .a Q a v V h. vl o
0 z H I
71 - U v YI 3 N }y' 0 o m a. a w m C m o b .e y F:-c3 o
(0 JJ 11 w > O U1 W H 3 ❑ W y m c m U W 20 'y
W m 7.. o coy U ° ~q ° v qc W v a ;o e`h ryy1
Q c U a U Z o i c d m °1 .-I ,-vi o w 3 c o° C m 0co ^ ` 'O ` - ~C)
U
m 1J N C y O m O y v N ❑ w a~ c m 6' m (d
R'i m w m .c w O I F o o F v ~e v F 'v 5n 'y v o w o ~c Z ['~i] m'
a o ~u $y' 3 0 z l m m i-] to u n ~ 0 F a m w m v o Ir
a
3
r {nn
R 1--~v ,clr-Z(7r7- O q c~ 1
~~;U'a~ u 1VV
pBJJ MV 3N MOO 31VIS
r
0
N
b
N
Q
d
a
V
0
_U
O
z
n
v a
U V
a a
t~-
C C S w S
.
i
O tl F O O
"
O.
C a
O N
m o0
Qi
T
o
a~
o
U N
U •O c d
3w
y O 'N
s~
o
$
~
~ ~ "
N
a ?
~ a
a
a
y
~
~ a
.p
A N S
O U
SA
..U+
CO "
b ~O yT y
4
al
aC w m y
U
a
y o o
> d
w"
al
`d
}a
O
~
O y
A0 6°
m
w
v
v
U
N
9c
z
C P
.tl O n
UI
w p
N
8 o
~
a. 6
"
3 a>
q `
N b
:tl
a
n
a'
'S v p
0
m
" U
>
a
N .O ,D
w
N
n `a
`eL
m
o
~ s ~
N
°
'o ~ ' 3 ~
o
m
C
.
a
ro
.
Do
tl
O
S
N
0
C S
I
O O
?d S T
U
N
y
U O
O
-
y IO
N p 0
N
y w N
}-I
C
y A U F N
W
o,
U v
i
U
.q v a
w
N b
m
N tl
o
a
T ,
o
y N o v
m
d
W
r
O
j1l N r.
a
u
❑
c
N
o sa
c w
n
o
o
b
'a v c s
d
o
m p
,
d m w
u
a~
F
"
W 'd
ti m
o w c
°3
H
v w
wy
w
m
Z
H o W
o
~
tl m
v
C
?O
N
n y y
N
O
p
W
m
m
p
00 N
O
tl
7
Q
'S
N
N
b
M
N
W
Q
.S
O
'
U
m
o v
O
y
v. N
>
y
N RI
U1
S
joy' 'S CO N
w ~d .b
ydi
O '4
3 v
W
rn
C
o
a/
O-
fy
o
.
tli
w
m s,
G
ro
i
° a a o n
N
CCC
j
~
W
Si
UI
y~ H
N m y
~
tl w y OD
?4 N
'
V1
U U~ m G Ot
'
,S
N
~
U N
a
'
G7
al
A
7-1
ar
'O U ~
h
1t
w -
d v°i O y
° 'S
U C
S
+
N
Si
v
C
'S ~
w ~ H
v J
-S
R
F
R
o
'
N
W
tl w
W N m
U y C.
rd
f'i
O
:
'
.Q
N
va N
Zi
G° G
v s ro
x
m
a
Z
5
° O
p
-"i
o
04
0.1
h
o
h -o ay
-
a
v
a3
a
N
3
al
w
S m W
.,>y
al
q
3
y
Z
3
_
r
~
z
7
'a
v
o
v
o 'd
.S c y e ,a
s,
in
E cY
b
(
O-,
]
.
W
'P
v
n
m
"O W
a
B ~
Y a
n
~
o
'g
o
rn
° w
G
`
b 'S ~
❑
m
m
O
I~
Yi
G
m
G p
.
?i
?'J O
m .
c .
.
w W .y
N
0,
>
'd
N
rl
>
c
C z° W N
N
r^!i
"0
.O x
N
Q~
Sw
tl
9
m ?C
~4
al
zm
W O W
~
W
3
O
0
H
~
d
.
v
d 'y 'x 'O
u~X
d w N
O
`yJ' ❑ o
C
'
YA
S
a ~e~
xi G C A S
O
N
H
s
'
o
~4
N
y
°
U
i6
rte. }a la
v .p
T C U ❑ o
.7 a)
W
~y
y N is 04
tl
fd.y
4
j,
i-0
o
0 07 U
o A
6 a> 3
.tl O
a
F m v z .-i V]
in
Q
J
L,
h
~ M
~ z
N
N
v
Case No.:
A0315
Quarter Section Map N
App: Last Name:
Bymaster
Related Cases:
App: First N ame:
ulle
Case Histor y:
Owne r: Last Name:
Bymaster
Owner: First Nam e:
Mark & Julie
App Addre as:
295 Fenton St.
Review Body:
City, State Z ip:
heat Ridge, CO 80212
App: Pho ne:
03-239-8051 ~
. APN'
Owner Address:
ame ~
- 2nd Revie wBody:
City/St ate/Zip:
I
2nd Review Date
Owner Phone:
ame
Decision-making Body
Project Address:
295 _
Approval/Denial Date:
Street Name
Fenton Street
City/State, Zip:
IWheat Ridge, CO 80212
Re so/Ordinance No.:
Case Disposition:
Project Planner: ustin
File Lo cation: ctive
Notes:
Follow- Up: r
o.: IN-E25
i..
5 ft.side yard setback
ariance in R-1C zone dist.
o allow a 2nd story
ddition
BOA - 7124103
9-251251-19-015-015
BOA-7/24/03
Conditions of Approval:
District: 1~...
Date Rec eived: 713/2003,..
Pre-App Date: I
I.! IOF WHEAT TRINE
n-1/r, hD-, 11:4 AN. crib
J,_t is W11.16LTER
c hill l"-
6.'Ei'ETPl ld0:L'0154U.: n..-vn1
r. 30 rlil
H_C ,T: 7i1h1TFJlR. HFt if~FUMH
`iih r
1+
7) 1 ,
F'wYilFjy7 i'c_ETI:0 lifjllidi
Uti)
In /,i✓'` TT
wil
jllTr=lI