Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWA-03-22In Page 1 of 1 To: "'meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us"' <meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: Letter in support of administrative variance Dear Meredith: Thank you so much for your help with the wall variance. I am positive it would not have been approved without your hard work. Attached is the letter in support of the administrative variance for the room. I hope it is not too late-my dockets have been totally crazy! Have a good weekend. Lisa D. Hamilton-Fieldman District Court Magistrate 20th Judicial District l isa. fieldman @ judicial. state. co. us 7125 West 32nd Avenue Dec 4 2003.doc Printed for Meredith Reckert <meredith@ci.wheatridge.co.us> 1/12/2004 7500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Wheat Telephone 303/235-2846 Ridge FAX 303/235-2857 December 18, 2003 Lisa Fieldman 7125 West 32nd Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Dear Ms. Fieldman: RE: Case No. WA-03-22 Please be advised that at its meeting of December 3, 2003, the Board of Adjustment APPROVED your request for a variance to Section 26-603(A) Permitted Fence Heights for property zoned Residential-Two and located at 7125 West 32"d Avenue for the following reasons: 1. Upon review of the request, staff concluded that the above criteria are supportive of the fence height variance. Staff has found there are unique circumstances attributed to this request that would warrant approval of the variance. There are unique circumstances due to the grade change on the property. 2. The proposed fence will not increase congestion in the public streets nor increase any fire danger. 3. The wall, as designed, will occur approximately twelve feet back from the sidewalk. 4. The grade change from the curb and the proposed parallel parking area and the front porch is approximately 3.5 feet with the house occurring above the sidewalk. Therefore, the proposed fence will come to approximately 2.5 feet above the level of the front porch when viewed from the street. 5. As designed, this wall should create a visual enhancement to the general neighborhood. With the following conditions: The fence shall be constructed in accordance with the design and materials included in the packet and presented to the Board by the applicant. A permanent separation shall occur between parallel parking, the neighbor's driveway and the sidewalk. Lisa Fieldman Page 2 December 18, 2003 Enclosed is a copy of the Certificate of Resolution, as well as a draft copy of the minutes, stating the Board's decision which became effective the date of the meeting, December 3, 2003. This variance shall automatically expire within one hundred eighty (180) days of the date it was granted, May 31, 2004, unless a building permit has been obtained. Please feel free to contact me at (303) 235-2846 if you have any questions. Sincerely, -IIr Kathy Field Administrative Assistant Enclosures: Certificate of Resolution Draft of Minutes cc: WA-03-22 (case file) Building File 00ocuments and SettingsUathyWy Documents\Kathy\BOA\CORRESP\2003\wa0322approval.wpd CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTION I, Ann Lazzeri, Secretary to the City of Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment, do hereby certify that the following Resolution was duly adopted in the City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, on the 3`d day of December, 2003. CASE NO: WA-03-22 APPLICANT'S NAME: Lisa Fieldman LOCATION: 7125 West 32"d Avenue WHEREAS, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and WHEREAS, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-03-22 is an appeal to this Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and WHEREAS, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law, and in recognition that there WERE NO protests registered against it; and WHEREAS, the relief applied for MAY be granted without detriment to the public welfare and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-03-22 be, and hereby is, APPROVED. TYPE OF VARIANCE: A variance to Section 26-603(A) Permitted Fence Heights for property zones Residential-Two and located at 7125 West 32"d Avenue. FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. Upon review of the request, staff concluded that the above criteria are supportive of the fence height variance. Staff has found there are unique circumstances attributed to this request that would warrant approval of the variance. There are unique circumstances due to the grade change on the property. 2. The proposed fence will not increase congestion in the public streets nor increase any fire danger. 3. The wall, as designed, will occur approximately twelve feet back from the sidewalk. 4. The grade change from the curb and the proposed parallel parking area and the front porch is approximately 3.5 feet with the house occurring above the sidewalk. Therefore, the proposed fence will come to approximately 2.5 feet above the level of the front porch when viewed from the street. 5. As designed, this wall should create a visual enhancement to the general neighborhood. Board of Adjustment Resolution WA-03-22 Pagetwo WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The fence shall be constructed in accordance with the design and materials included in the packet and presented to the Board by the applicant. 2. A permanent separation shall occur between parallel parking, the neighbor's driveway and the sidewalk. VOTE: YES: ABBOTT, BLAIR, DRDA, HOVLAND NO: HOWARD ABSENT: ECHELMEYER DISPOSITION: A request for a variance to Section 26-603(A) Permitted Fence Heights for property zoned Residential-Two and located at 7125 West 32"d Avenue was APPROVED. ADOPTED and made effective this 3 d day of December, 2003. Paul Ds air Board of Adjustment Ann Lazzeri, Secreta Board of Adjustment result of the variance. 7. The city traffic engineer has reviewed and approved the street access from this property to West 47'h Avenue. With the following conditions: t u-0 1. The curb cut from Wadsworth Boulevar must ~ie closet and access to the property shall be limited to West 47'h Avenue. 2. The current garage door facing Wadsworth must be abandoned and permanently sealed. A new garage door accessing from the west will be allowed. 3. No parking of any kind may occur along the Wadsworth Boulevard frontage. 4. Parking areas must be clearly and permanently delineated from landscaped areas. Adequate legally designed east-to-west parking, as described by the applicant in testimony to the Board, must be created and maintained per Section 26-501(D) of the City's Code of Laws. 5. All current landscaping requirements of the city related to R-2 occupancies on a corner lot shall be created and maintained on this property. 6. The first 25 feet of driveway off of West 47`h Avenue shall be paved pursuant to applicable sections in the City Code. Board Member HOVLAND commented that he felt the motion addressed all the issues. Single-family use for this property is not realistic and, if left abandoned, it could become more of a detriment to the neighborhood than having a viable duplex in the area. The motion passed unanimously. (Chair DRDA declared a brief recess at 9:10 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 9:15 P.M.) B. Case No. WA-03-22: An application filed by Lisa Fieldman for approval of a variance to Section 26-603(A) Permitted Fence Heights for property zoned Residential-Two and located at 7125 West 32"d Avenue. The case was presented by Meredith Reckert. She explained that, after the case was published, it was discovered that the landscape buffer requirement did not apply. Therefore, the fence height variance is the only matter to be considered at this meeting. She advised the Board there was jurisdiction to hear the case. She entered all pertinent documents into the record and reviewed the staff report and digital presentation. Staff recommended approval of the application for reasons outlined in the staff report. In response to a question from Board Member ABBOTT, Meredith Reckert stated that staff determined there was no problem with sight distance triangle issues. Board of Adjustment ]2/03/03 Lisa Fieldman 7125 West 32nd Avenue Ms. Fieldman, the applicant, was sworn in by Chair DRDA. She explained that the design of the proposed fence and driveway would allow safer access onto 32"d Avenue by eliminating the necessity of backing out onto the street. The 6-foot gate section of the fence would also prevent headlights from shining into the master bedroom. She also believed the fence would provide extra security in light of the fact that she has experienced problems with prowlers during the last couple of years. She distributed copies of other fences in the area that are similar to the one she was proposing. She also stated that the aesthetic design of the fence should be an enhancement to the neighborhood. Board Member ABBOTT asked what the grade change is from street level to the front door. Bill Sroufe 1560 Thatch Circle, Castle Rock Mr. Sroufe, contractor for the applicant, was sworn in by Chair DRDA. He stated that the grade change referred to by Board Member ABBOTT is approximately 3.5 feet from the public sidewalk to the door threshold. He also explained that the fence would be constructed of concrete with a stucco finish. In response to a question from Board Member HOVLAND, Ms. Fieldman stated that she would have no problem with placing a concrete delineation between the public sidewalk and the driveway and a further delineation to prevent people from using her neighbor's curb cut to leave her property. There was no one present from the public who wished to address this application. Chair DRDA commented that there did not seem to be adequate proof of hardship in this case. Board Member ABBOTT stated that he believed the situation of backing out onto 32"d Avenue is a hardship in that it presents a danger for both the person leaving the property and other drivers on 32"d Avenue. He also commented that he would be opposed to the project if the fence were a solid wall, but the decorative cutouts in the fence make the substance of the wall to be within the four foot requirement. Board Member BLAIR commented that the proposed fence would not be inconsistent with other fence heights along 32"d Avenue. Upon a motion by Board Member ABBOTT and second by Board Member BLAIR, the following resolution was stated: Board of Adjustment Page 6 12/03/03 Whereas, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and Whereas, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-03-22 is an appeal to this Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and Whereas, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law, and in recognition that there were no protests registered against it; and Whereas, the relief applied for may be granted without detriment to the public welfare and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge. Now, therefore, be it resolved that Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA- 03-22 be, and hereby is, APPROVED. Type of Variance: A variance to Section 26-603(A) Permitted Fence Heights for property zoned Residential-Two and located at 7125 West 32"d Avenue. For the following reasons: rAF`I WR 1. Upon review of the request, staff concluded that the above criteria are supportive of the fence height variance. Staff has found there are unique circumstances attributed to this request that would warrant approval of the variance. There are unique circumstances due to the grade change on the property. 2. The proposed fence will not increase congestion in the public streets nor increase any fire danger. 3. The wall, as designed, will occur approximately twelve feet back from the sidewalk. 4. The grade change from the curb and the proposed parallel parking area and the front porch is approximately 3.5 feet with the house occurring above the sidewalk. Therefore, the proposed fence will come to approximately 2.5 feet above the level of the front porch when viewed from the street. 5. As designed, this wall should create a visual enhancement to the general neighborhood. With the following conditions: 1. The fence shall be constructed in accordance with the design and materials included in the packet and presented to the Board by the applicant. 2. A permanent separation shall occur between parallel parking, the neighbor's driveway and the sidewalk. The motion passed 4-1 with Board Member HOWARD voting no. Board of Adjustment Page 7 12/03/03 PHOTOGRAPHS OF FENCES/WALLS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE "FOUR FOOT" RULE DESCRIBED IN SECTION 26-603 OF THE CODE. All ARE WITHIN A TWO MILE RADIUS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. '111' 11 COLUMNS 7 FT WALL 6FT 1 IN SETBACK 6FT 31N 5750 W 32ND WHEATRIDGE 1r ! ~ j ~I.:," HEIGHT 9 FT SET BACK SIDEWALK 23 FT 5985 N HARLEN FENCE HEIGHT 8 FT SET BACK 1 FT 4 IN 7105 30TH AVE SET BACK 23 FT 3 IN FENCE HEIGHT 6 FT 5 IN 3525 ALLISON ST HEIGHT 6 FT SETBACK 11 FT FROM ROAD 3292 N MARSHALL ST HEIGHT 6 FT 1 IN SETBACK TO SIDEWALK 23 IN 3320 N MARSHALL ST CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO: Board of Adjustment DATE OF MEETING: December 3, 2003 CASE MANAGER: Meredith Reckert CASE NO. & NAME: Case No. WA-03-22/Fieldman ACTION REQUESTED: Request for approval of a fence height variance LOCATION OF REQUEST: 7125 West 32nd Avenue NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT (S): Lisa Fieldman 7125 W. 32nd Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER(S): same APPROXIMATE AREA: 10,500 square feet PRESENT ZONING: Residential-Two (R-2) PRESENT LAND USE: Single family SURROUNDING ZONING: N, E, W: R-2; S: PRD SURROUNDING LAND USE: N, E & W: single family residences S: multi-family DATE PUBLISHED: November 13, 2003 DATE POSTED: November 19, 2003 DATE LEGAL NOTICES SENT: November 20, 2003 ENTER INTO THE RECORD: (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) ZONING ORDINANCE ( ) SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS (X) EXHIBITS (X) OTHER JURISDICTION: The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. Board of Adjustment t Case No. WA-03-22/Fieldman I. REQUEST The property in question is located at 7125 West 32nd Avenue and is currently utilized as a single-family residence. The property has Residential-Two (R-2) zoning (Exhibit 1, Zoning Map). The applicant/owner (Exhibit 2, Deed) requests approval of the of a fence height variance to allow a fence higher than four feet in the front yard. The fence in question would vary in height from 4' to 9' in height. Please see Exhibit 3 (Improvement Location Certificate), Exhibit 4 (Application) and Exhibit 5 (Letter of Request). Staff had originally published this case as needing a landscaping variance. Staff has subsequently concluded that this variance is not needed. No action should be taken on the second portion of the request noted on the agenda. II. SITE PLAN The property measures 75' x 140' and contains 10,500 square feet. There is an approximate 10' grade change from the southwest corner of the lot to the northeast corner of the lot. A two-vehicle carport is provided east of the existing house. The driveway entering the property from 32"d Avenue slopes down into the carport. There is room behind the carport for an additional vehicle to be parked, however this is on the slope. There is no at-grade parking on the property. The applicant has submitted a site plan (Exhibit 6, Site Plan) showing the location of the proposed fence/wall on the south side of the house. The proposed fence will be decorative in nature and will create an outdoor patio space in front of the home (Exhibit 7, Fence elevation). The proposed wall will have a southwestern design and will vary in height from 4' to 6' by 18" wide niches. The perimeter wall transitions into a retaining wall on the east side to accommodate a sunroom addition, which is shown on the site plan but is not part of the request. The highest point of the retaining wall is where it attaches to the southeast corner of the house at a height of 9'. While it is a structural element which will support the foundation for the addition, the retaining wall is still considered a fence and is included as part of the variance request for fence height. III. VARIANCE CRITERIA Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a variance request: 1. Can the property in question yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located? Board of Adjustment Case No. WA-03-22/Fieldman If the request is denied, the property may still receive a reasonable return in use. The property is currently utilized as a single-family residence, and this use may continue. 2. If the variance were granted, would it alter the essential character of the locality? The design of the proposed wall is not solid but varies in height from 4' to 6' in the front and up to 9' where it meets the corner of the house. This is a neighborhood which is diverse in land use (single family residences and duplexes with multi-family to the south) and architectural styles (ranch homes adjacent to brick bungalows). While the proposed wall will be different than other fences in the area with a southwest design, it is this diversity, which makes Wheat Ridge unique. 3. Does the particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved result in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out? The property is rectangular in shape and has a grade change of 10' from the southwest corner of the property to the northeast. The proposed wall transitions to a retaining wall at the southeast corner of the house. The retaining wall is necessary to support the foundation for the sun porch addition, which will be built on the south side of the home. If the variance is not granted, the retaining wall can't be built. The retaining wall is required to support the foundation for the sun porch addition. 4. Has the alleged difficulty or hardship been created by any person presently having an interest in the property? The applicant has created her own hardship by proposing a fence, which does not meet the fence height requirements. However, there are other fences in the area which exceed the maximum height allowed in the front setback. 5. Would the granting of the variance be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located, by, among other things, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing the danger of tire or endangering the public safety, or substantially diminishing or impairing property values within the neighborhood? Approval of the request would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other properties in the area. The adequate supply of light and air would not be compromised as a result of the request, nor would there be an increase in congestion in the streets or an increase in fire danger. If the variance is granted, there could be an affect on the overall consistency of the neighborhood architecturally. Wheat Ridge is known as having diverse housing types and architectural styles. Board of Adjustment Case No. WA-03-22/Fieldman 6. If criteria 1 through 5 are found, then, would the granting of the variance result in a benefit or contribution to the neighborhood or the community, as distinguished from an individual benefit on the part of the applicant, or would granting of the variance result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities? The requests would not result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities. IV. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Upon review of the request, staff concludes that the above criteria are supportive of the fence height variance. Staff has found that there are unique circumstances attributed to this request that would warrant approval of a variance. Therefore, staff recommends approval for the following reasons: 1. There are unique circumstances due to the grade change on the property. 2. The proposed decorative fence will not increase congestion in the public streets, nor increase fire danger. With the following conditions: 1. The fence be constructed in accordance with the design and materials shown on exhibits included in this packet. Board of Adjustment Case No. WA-03-22/Fieldman » WZ-B1-5 R-3 i w as.n AvE _ 2 8 A .91 A SiniE SUPPLY WZ-9] a 8 C.5 FR $ W99] AV g R R a" -3 $ aBa R _ < ssn ~ y15 ® Af ID E H ~ N R o fFTR K Z 35UN WX5 AV Z A n ~ ku Y ~ - 8 >a~ W 3 RD AV n e' AN E 0 OD E ~ 0 Lo a O 0. s F' W 32M K w n u R R- p m ~ ~ R a a Z-A91 R R \ < ~ fl _ 8 w3ry7 q._ . / Z , 8 _ _ R W Q eS _ ` ~ u N R R R ~ OL A ~ ~ Q R ~ g 8 R ~ w 7 a. d R R .R A ~ 8 a~ A R 1 - g ALaY~ W Wi AA m R ~ ~ ~ _ ~R-2 ~;r I E 9 0) ~ A R 8 a a 8 R a 1 R Q m a as nA w ' 8 - 8 - R 8 - $ R e R R R DZ._. U- y n R R R . R. R l F g R g R R g R F - A _ s - i . W. MIH AV . YWARD HA g PARK J " I . a w CI I 1 WMiM AVE a ORTEN E NS R z HALL LL A fl R-2 ~ k TNh WIG E U P R O S n k n a 5U6 K2 $ W2M AV rE s R-2 R s IBIT 1 EXH W b~ ~ i n y N _ W P' RECEPTION NO. F0.-9952 18.80 Q0. --PG;. 0001-001 1• Fn on 743 -RECORDED IN JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORADO 6/27/96 11:21 raam BMW O Fth-C~ty . this ay of Jtme 25, 1996 4 H/)C/A ~12g SRCM Cmnty of JEFFEHSM and state of S lDocumentary Fee t~psrt std D to -BLYwTIIIIH 7125 SMSf 32M AVENUE whDae lapel sores. I. WM= RIMS 0DICRADO `8003$ of the ceenry of JEFFERBQi and state of Colorado, of the atcoratpart. WITNIS/TN, That the aid parry of the first part, for aM in consideration of the sue of Pte$128.000.00 ) ONE MM RED TWENTY EIGHT THa=W DOLLARS AND 00/109THS - to the said party of the first Dart In hard paid by the add party of the second Dart, the receipt wharsof is hereby mkrmwl.dged and cOrdtssad, has bargained, granted, Bald and cone", and by these presents does grant, Mnsin, sell, eonesy and confirm, unto the said party of the secord part, his heirs and suign forever, all the following ascribed lot NE 1/4 OF SID[MON -26, 1UWtEQUIP 3 BWDS Tf4: SOVIH 8IDE OF SAID TRACP, COUM OF sat also known as street ramber 7125 WEST 321M AVENUE %U= RXDGE, COIAMAM 80033 TOOEtXER with it and singular and hereditaments and appyrtsnsncn thereto belonging, or In armnise appertaining, and the reversion and ravarelan, reeslrtler er4 rcoelyders, rents, issues anat profits thereof; and It the estate, right, title m interest. claim aad demand whstsoever of the said party of the first part, either in Iw or a fty,gf, in W to the above bargained premises, with the hereditament. and appdrtenancee. TO HAVE AM To HOED the said promises above bargafn.d erW ascribed, with the appurtenances, into the said party of the second part, his heir, and assigns forever. and the sold party of the first part, for hiseelf, his heirs, tsamtors, and administrators, does coverwnt, grant, bargain, and asholio and with•the said Perry of the second part, his heirs and euigte, that at the tiro of the animating and delivery of that. presents, he is well seized of the prealsom above conveyed, as of good, aura, perfeet, mbeulute and 1nd.fatsibla .,at. of Inherits.., I. I.., In fee slept., and has goad right, full power and Lawful authority to grant, bargain, sell and canrvey the sent in eresr ant. fane as aforesaid, and that the smae are free .rd otter fr. all forcer and other grants, barRaina, Soles, liars, tests, onnsaenn and ercuRtrorcas of whatever kind or nature soever; EXCEPT GENERAL TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS FOR THE YEAR 1996 AND SUBSEWENT YEARS AND SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, COVENANTS AIM RIGHTS OF WAY OF RECORD, IF ANT; seat the aboved borgalrwd prmisn In the ,plat and Peaceable possession of amid party of the record Dart, his hairs aid adore against alt and every person or mrse m lawfully chiaim or to claim the uEote or try part thereof, the said party of the first part shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND. The Mnqular saber shall Include the stwmi, the plural the singular, sad the me of try parlor shalt be applicable to all 9erders. IN WITNESS WHFREOF, the said party of the first part has heraneto set his hard and seal the ay std year first above written. IvIva4~ tf[J,.Z (seu) STATE OF COLORADO DO . (SEAL) > ss. . taw pY•w I INS art w.4 scAewledged before se an this ay of ,7lIDB 25, 1996 EXHIBIT 2 Aljaff~ L A N D S U R V E Y I N G 5660 WARD ROAD • SUITE 160 ARVADA, COLORADO 80002 (303) 420-4788 C TE DATE 11/112470 EEE III 001OB# 01-9540 MORTGAGE CO. MCAT OTM_C QI M_ 1KOT ADDRESS 7355 w 3211D AVE BORROWERS NAME WANTI-TgN4161 9"! LEGAL DESCRIPTION IMPROVEMENT LOCATION ERTIFICA IveRcuenr$ Attn: LISA lit 756311W Cr 9= 3ASP 2 5 MW Or ma swTK 160 FM Cr ffi NOT 7/10 Cr MW SK . 1/4 Q 2111111 S 1/4 Or 7! M 1/4 a 26, 7 M MP 3 MW= 3 69 1oliIIIIIP Cr Rsls 6mg P.Y. momw A 30 PW w= AULM ME MW S= Or WD 7RACT, COORM CF =7XIRSION, S7= Or COURRID I_ V x. scd.: r-30' ° 715.0' I 725 Wed 334 Ar.R. 2aO' EXHIBIT 3 .UR.Iw,IRYV..MgM.. , LJ 0 I LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION Community Development Department 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Phone (303) 235-2846 (Please print or type all information) Applicant ` 'icr c\ a yvxra fN Address -I \e4 fTYk- Phone'7 2.o di g - ~ City(pJV A_ r&Qg ` State C_fl Zip Fax / Owner 01ayve_r3,c tanc:iv.e Address Phone eta City tr~~ State Zip Fax ContacTa, Sf© y r2 Address ho S, Sar i v ~S 10o Phon_e:Su-~, City ~e ~aS fer State C cp Zip 2 c_'i-z Fax~y~ Tic (The person listed as contact will be contacted to answer questions regarding this application, provide additional information when necessary , post public hearing signs, and will receive a copy of the staff report prior to Public Hearing.) Location of request NQ Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request): Application subtidual requirements on reverse side ❑ Change of zone or zone conditions O Special Use Permit ❑ Consolidation Plat ❑ Subdivision: Minor (5 lots or less) ❑ Flood Plain Special Exception ❑ Subdivision: Major (More than 5 lots) ❑ Lot Line Adjustment O Right of Way Vacation ❑ Planned Building Group ❑ Temporary Use, Building, Sign ❑ Site Development Plan approval ',Variance/Waiver (from Section ) ❑ Other: I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above, without whose consent the requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners must submit power-of-attomeycfrom the owner which approved of this action on his behalf. Signature of Applicant /v/ Subscri ed and sworn to me this day of 0bg~r, 20_q~> To be filled out by staff: 0 ; Date received ~d"-3 1 4 Comp Plan Desig. 0 Related Case No. _ Prep Notary Public My commission expires Heather Dickinson 500 South McCaslin E Louisville, CO 80027 Case No. 14/4- C)3- g- 41 Quarter Section Map :ase Manager k'.PT Required information: 1172,3 -2 S ks 1- Assessors Parcel Nnumber: 0 d Z z_l D Size of Lot (acres or quare foota e):O o S~ ~~ctc~ Current Zonin n C i rV ` a- g: I ( A-i Proposed Zoning: . Current Use: Proposed User] „1Jc 7125 West 32"d Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 720-318-5637 November 5, 2003 Wheat Ridge Planning Department Wheat Ridge, CO Dear Members of the Planning Department: Please accept this letter, the attached application, and the enclosed application fee, as my application for a variance from the Wheat Ridge city ordinance concerning the height of fencing in front yards. My reasons for requesting the variance are as follows: Security/Privacy. My house is a small raised ranch with a detached carport that sits approximately 30 feet back from 32"d Avenue. The master bedroom and the living room are in the front of the house, on 32"d. The living room has a large plate glass window on the 32"d Avenue side, and any passersby, either on foot or in vehicles, can see through that window straight through to the kitchen and anyone sitting or working in the either the living room or the kitchen. The master bedroom also has a large window, which opens, the bottom of which is only about 36 inches from ground level. I have had mail stolen from my mailbox, which is attached to the front of the house, and tools stolen from the front of the house. Twice I have come home to find my hose on from someone who apparently turned it on where the faucet is attached to the house to get a drink and then did not bother to turn it off, once my security light went on and we heard noises outside the front bedroom window and went out to find footprints in the soil in front of the window and twigs from the bushes there broken. My truck has been broken into while it was sitting in my carport. Except for the tool theft, these incidents have happened in the last two years. I feel exposed and vulnerable in my home. When I bought my house in 1996, I had a significant other who was six feet tall and a very strong man, and I was employed as an administrative law judge for the Colorado Public Utilities Commission. Since then, my significant other became ill and died, and I now sit as a District Court Magistrate and a municipal judge for various jurisdictions. I tell you this not to engender sympathy but to explain that, at the same time as the intrusions into my security and privacy have increased, and my need for security has risen because of my job, my resources for dealing with these problems have actually diminished. I need the proposed wall and gate to make the access to my house more difficult, and attempted intrusions more obvious from the street (attempting to go over a wall wSuld be much more obvious than simply walking up to the house). - Traffic Lights and Noise. The Planning Commission and staff and the City Council worked very closely with members of the community, including me, to make the development on the south side of 32"d between Saulsbury and Teller livable for everyone, and I appreciate that effort very much. Unfortunately, I do have one problem which has only been partially addressed by the layout of that development: lights from some EXHIBIT 5 vehicles, such as SUVs and trucks, shine into my master bedroom window when the vehicles enter and leave the parking area on the east side of the building and when they turn west on 32"d from Saulsbury. This summer I tried stacking bricks four feet high in approximately the area proposed for the wall to see if that would eliminate this problem, but it did not. The gate and one of the higher sections of the wall I have proposed would be placed to solve this problem. Traffic noise has also increased since the development was added. One resident in particular has a sporty red Volkswagen that is very loud as it rounds the corner from 32nd to Saulsbury. Loud, throbbing bass from passing cars, groups of motorcycles, and trash thrown from passing cars into my yard, have also increased since I bought my house, to the point where I cannot maintain a conversation in my front yard on a weekend morning, and being in my front yard for any purpose is not an enjoyable experience. A wall with some sections higher than four feet would go a long ways toward addressing these problems, and making my front yard usable again. The wall that I have designed is primarily a four foot high wall, but it has portions that are 4 feet 8 inches high,'portions that are 5 feet 4 inches high, and 18 inch wide sections that are six feet high. It is set back approximately 12 feet from the sidewalk, 15 feet from the street. In driving around my neighborhood, I found that many houses that front onto 32"d have some combination of fencing and planting higher than 4 feet tall on the 32nd Avenue side. For examples of lilacs, fitzers (spelling?), and hedges well over four feet high forming a solid fence or barrier, see 9889 West 32"d, 8820 West 32"d, 8521 and 8525 West 32"d, most of the houses between Garrison and the entrance to Lutheran Hospital on 32"d, several properties on Estes between 38`h and 32"d, 9390 West 37`h, and both north corners of Ammons and 32d. Some of these hedges are well-trimmed and maintained, but many of them are not. For examples of wooden 6 foot privacy fences in front of homes, see the southwest corner of 35`h and Saulsbury (both sides of a duplex), and 3775 Chase (entire perimeter surrounded by 6 foot privacy fence). And finally, for a brick and concrete wall that is, for all intents and purposes, solid to 6 and 7 feet, see the southeast corner of 32nd and Fenton. I do not want to and do not propose to wall my house off from the world. This is not a solid 6 foot wall. It is less solid and enclosed than many of the examples listed above: over 60 percent of the area above 4 feet would still be open, in what I believe to be an aesthetically pleasing design, yet it would dramatically change my sense of security and my use and enjoyment of my home. I respectfully request that you grant the variance I seek. Sincerely s~ - Lisa D. Hamilton-Fieldman w 1 APPROX I Note: ALL RW 6 PY.1. row) nNAnws ua BAStn w nr: ou~lc Bnewwx A, IN[ a-Nme a I,R ,or uNC alx0 v-B' V 0 • t Ir Y~ r SIDEWALK T N w o~ / fJ 9 v Wa l~ Conc. Wall PLAN A4 SCALE: 1/8" = 14-0" R s ~ / c wAU ~a+ \ ar-e• it e Y -T 4` c1, ~w+'sad tBw 6 B•_B• ~ PORI~T ~ d' f vwna a d REIA'NMG rAU .mow row s• RIO` mr ♦'-f RAN r'- - 1 CEN,fA P"NT 61C RA KTVRa1CM Oe REA"NC PAU, a10'. Q:J:- K~ 160X36" APPROXIMATELY PLANTING AREAS VERIFY OWNER NEW CONC. DRIVEWAY GUTTER / ( EXISTINGICURB CUT EXTEND CURB CUT 10' PQC71~dDQ~~L~Q(]~f 12INZ QDC~([7~M L/ ~ go i o ~MK~ L IEo -03 I MG MJG 2003DD0 D °`°m' W DD GROUP ra B..,BSar eowa . co mw~,sar 7125-Rl.DWG (DW)~N- E 3 CHANGES PER OWNERE IW 003. Z e Na - aewMOnQs~ mmwwmmmmmm~ Y EXHIBIT ■ 6 ••4 C WALL FOOTING CONFIGURATION, REINFORCING, AND SIZING TO BE SPECIFIED BY ENGINEER- a° 8„ J i s' _6 Ago rr-l w.D.. . 7:QOSS~swr~+ NEW 6" THICK 4' HIGH STUCCO FINISH CONC. WALL GATE PROVIDED A'~eN.CSlG-Gmurs Q~ 12 - BY rk-6 -j- Ele_-VOL-tl NICHE FOR PREFAB PO BOX PROVIDED BY OWNER . .I a ♦ ~ i 7%o 6 91~a b a 3-0 , a A - 3 NICHE FOR PREFAB PO BOX PROVIDED BY OWNER GATE PROVIDED BY OWNER NEW 6" THICK CONC. RETAINING WALL TIED TO HOUSE FOUNDATION AND OLD RETAINING WALL. EXISTING 6" THICK CONC. RETAINING WALL TO REMAIN S wee;;wr/=o~ ~y k ,S~'GT. = R=C1 WALL FOOTING CONFIGURATION, REINFORCING, AND SIZING TO BE SPECIFIED BY ENGINEER. e, Ae-`ev 1 conc. Wail Elevati A4 SCALE: 1/8" = V-0" CP~~C,~7 RIO ]~L(A [ C~~D~L /V1C~G , o2mp L~1 & 4 MG MJG 2003DDOI DESIGN ~ GROUP waec:ea PA B,s 1Ri0f : PA . D I n %7 CHANT: q EXHIBIT 7 .3 P i POSTING CERTIFICATION CASE NO. PLANNING COMMISSION / CITY COUNCIL / BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (Circle One) HEARING DATE: /,'-/3/03 r7 (n a m e) residingat_ (/02c 0, 3,2 JD C'() $2 33 (address) as the applicant for Case No. hereby certify that I have posted the Notice of Public Hearing at '71a ,5 ,yi. 6.2dAj7- }gym (location) on this jj/d y of _ A 1x~&M ~j~✓ 20__~21, and do hereby certify that said sign has been posted and remained in place for fifteen (15) days prior to and including the scheduled day of public hearing of this case. The sign was posted in the position shown on the map below. Signature: - i ~ ZIL NOTE: This form must be submitted at the public hearing on this case and will be placed in the applicant's case file at the Department of Planning and Development. ( / :2 k. V "P -C-)-3 . (~'r~~- Me oScan / fe - C #..1 rson Owner :Johnson Warren ".G Schedule :021588 •'i9 2Fil. 00 242 Site :7075 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 klai:1. :7075 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 7003 0500 0004 7661 3637 LandUse :1112Res,Improved Land Price - TaxDist :3142 OwnerP4 Bedrm:4 Bth:2.25- .YB:1957 Parking:Attached Firepl:2- TotArea:1,.391 Ac:.31 #.2 met=scan / Jefferson Owner :Frazier James R - Schedule :021693 Site :7060 W 32nd P1 Wheat Ridge 80033 Parcel Mail :708.0. W 32nd P1 Wheat Ridge Co 80033 7003 0500 X004 7661 364 LandUse :1112 Res,Improved Land - - 00;000 TaxDist :3142 OwnerPh :303-274-0171 Bedrm:4 Bth:~1.75. YB:1954 Parking:Detached Firepl: TotArea:1,242 Ac: #.3 * metros an / Jefferson Owner :Kresge Christine E ` Schedule :021847 Site :7030 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80Q33 M.a~l :703,0,W : 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge Co (V\Y']g" 7003 0500 0004 7661 3651 LandUse :1112 Res,Improved Land rice :$290,000 TaxDist :3142 \ OwnerPh Bedrm: Bth:3.50 YB:1964 Parking:Attached Firepl: TotArea:1,964 Ac: # 4 MetroScan / Jefferson Owner :Van Scoyk Mary E Schedule :022048 Site :7135 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 Parr=~ 7 661 3668 Mail :7193 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 7003 0500 0004 ? LandUse :1112 Res,Improved Land cc TaxDist :3142 OwnerPh Bedrm:2 Bth:-1.75 YB:1955 Parking:Attached Firepl:l TotArea:1,108 Ac:.25 # 5 * : MetroScan / Jefferson Owner :Nelabovige Joseph M A/Margaret J Schedule :-022252 Site :7130 W 32nd P1 Wheat Ridge 80033 "I 1^ Mail :7130 W 32nd 21 Wheat Ridge. Co 80033 7003 0500 0004 7661 3675 LandUse :1112Res,Improved Land rice TaxDist :3142 OwnerPh Bedrm:3 Bth:1.50 YB:1954 Parking:Attached Firepl:l TotArea:l.,329 Ac: #.6 MetroScan / Jefferson : Owner :Hamilton-fieldman Lisa D Schedule :022441 Site :7125 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 7003 osoo~oo04~661 3682 Mail :7125 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80033 LandUse :1112 Res,Improved Land Price :$128,000 Full TaxDist :3142 OwnerPh Bedrm:4 Bth:.1.75 YB:1954 Parking:Carport Firepl:l TotArea:1,120 Ac:.25 # 7 MetroScan / Jefferson • Owner :Omiecinski Janine Schedule :022667 Site :7095 W 32nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033 par^°' Mail :7095 W 32nd. Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80033 7003 0500 0004 7661 3699 LandUse :1112 Res,Improved Land rice :$181,500 Full TaxDist :3142 OwnerPh Bedrm:4 Bth:1.75 YB:1954 Parking:Basement Firepl: TotArea:1,120 Ac:.25 # 8 MetroScan / Jefferson • Owner :Greenleaf Barbara M Schedule :022744 Site :7140 W 32nd P1 ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge ann~~pa •zQ 191 nn 000 Mail :7140 W 32nd P1 ( No Mail ) Wheat Ridge 7003 0500 0004 7661 3620 LandUse :1112 Res,Improved Land rice TaxDist :3142 OwnerPh Bedrm: Bth:1.00 YB:1962 Parking:Attached Firepl: TotArea:882 Ac:.21 # 9 * - MetroScan / Jefferson • Owner :Van Scoyk'•Mary E Schedule :022827 Site :7193 W 32nd%Ave eat edge 80033 Parcel :39 261 00 230 Mail :7193 W 32nd 11v - Wheaat e C 8.d43-3~ Xferd :01/07/1974 LandUse :1112 Re7Tm oved Lll d Price TaxDist :3142 OwnerPh Bedrm:3 Bth: YB:1 99 Parking:Detached Firepl:l TotArea:2,678 Ac- :x.88 NOV 19 2003 Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. # 10 Owner Site Mail LandUse TaxDist Bedrm:3 # 11 Owner Site Mail LandUse TaxDist Bedrm: # 12 Owner Site Mail LandUse TaxDist Bedrm:3 MetroScan / Jefferson :Varner Dorothy M Et Al Schedule :022829 :7070 W 32nd 21 Wheat Ridge 80033 7003 0500 0004 7661 3705 :7070 W 32nd P1 Wheat Ridge Cc 80033 :1112 Res,Improved Land Price :3142 - OwnerPh :303-237-5934 Bth:1.50 YB:1956 Parking:Detached Firepl: TotArea:1,167 Ac: : MetroScan / Jefferson - :Saulsbury Properties Lllp :3195 Saulsbury St Wheat Ridge 80033 :1546 Cole Blvd #227 Golden Co 80401 :5112 Res,Apartments,Improved Land 3142 Bth: YB:2000 Parking: * MetroScan ulsbury Properties Lllp~ Schedule :431278 "A n9 013 7p03 0500 0004 7661 3712 Price OwnerPh Firepl: TotArea:12,151 Ac:1.10 / Jefferson Schedule Schedule :431279 :71 W 32nd Ave Wheat Rsflge 80033 Parcel :39 264 02 014 :1546 le Blvd #2~.V--Colden Cc 0401 Xferd. :03/26/1999 :1112 Res, pr ed Land Ct1/~ - Price :3142 G OwnerPh B .00 YB: 9 Parking:Det ched Firepl:l TotArea:1,735 Ac:.32 NOV 19 2003 Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 The City of Wheat Ridge Telephone 303/235-2846 FAX 303/235-2857 November 19, 2003 Dear Property Owner: This is to inform you of Case No. WA-03-22 which is a request for approval of a variance to Section 26-603(A) Permitted Fence Heights AND a waiver of the required 10 foot wide landscape buffer when adjacent to a public street for property zoned Residential-Two (R-2) and located at 7125 West 32"d Avenue. This case will heard by the Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue on December 3, 2003, at 7:30 p.m. As an area resident or interested parry, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at 303- 235-2846. Thank you. Planning Division. C\Documents and Settings\kathyOMy Documents\Katby\BOA\pubnotice\2003\wa0322.wpd Adjoining 39-21,1 W. 32 nd Ave. 9744 1 25' 25' 9398, 218.24' 40 155 t 027 2 .h 02 1 1 M 2-H A P PYo 3-A SUB 4-B 4-A o 85.44' 80 54' A N D I N G S 1100 44 13' 44 61 65 39 See 9 m CD OD _ 1 92 22' I I - 10044' CHERRY 31722 1 4 6 I_ N ose 2-H o m $ O 0 X18 " L N 119 7318' 125 Q67 5 I0 I- E. io 2-F 012 "4 123 N 2 0 003 S U „ 6 ; U B 011 N " i - F • 3 °p PA R R Y = v 126' 1 19219' co 004 cn 2-o M I N O R 60 of 7 01 0 6 N _ pIQ 3-G " ® m O 005 ,y, 1 1 1, 11 co 15 192 19' 125' _ ' 67 32 West 30 th Avenue 4-K ^ 02 I ti 2 A 3• 6962 2d 26 11 r 4 - 015 ® 0 0 08 c 0 07 0 006 N P N - PALMYR 7 P RK 2 m m 013 2 " O - 05 N - " 4-J W- 30 th A 3- J 91.68 91 68 91 68 91.6 G 14 ~o - - - i m 012 West N ih N 14 1.!' _ 75' 75` 75 75 6b V ie 9 8 7 9 9 296 00 a 002 003 258 2 5 N 228 227 229 - 253 75' oil" 7-9; 1 230 N ~ ~ O ~ n 6 ~ V 68 234 231 179 316 25 239 ° 240 ° 241 242 ~i 243 244 N 1 N O 141.5 75' 75' 1 75' 75, 2d 55 78. West 32 nd Ave i ng . 39- 264 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT on December 3, 2003, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building at 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. The following petitions shall be heard: Case No. WA-03-21: An application submitted by Jeff Petty for approval of a 24 square foot variance from the 12,500 square foot minimum lot area requirement to allow a two- family dwelling unit on property zoned Residential-Two (R-2) and located at 4695 Wadsworth Boulevard. Case No. WA-03-22: An application filed by Lisa Fieldman for approval of a variance to Section 26-603(A) Permitted Fence Heights AND a waiver of the required 10 foot wide landscape buffer when adjacent to a public street for property zoned Residential- Two (R-2) and located at 7125 West 32nd Avenue. Kathy Field, Administrative Assistant ATTEST: Wanda Sang, City Clerk To be published: Wheat Ridge Transcript Date: November 13, 2003 -1 MW t $ .901 Z \yi m 00 -T kof Wa ~ \ \ ' C r •C mm pQ N0 ~ C QC m• ~~\n~~ W r CS W \ F Q 0 C m a ~ U 'eit { m m m c r ml 3 w o F rc rc m3 a m s p ~00s 2u7 0 Q m £ 3pS 'c'I - CC x wLL rvp g ..i 1 G0 Lt m. i 30 m ~p m m o ~ saa o oz ~ fr [!j g~ Q . t I. m pn~ Y m~i= 'gyp !J I^.A~ ; t ~p,Cr ■Y~ E~ ~ ~ N~ ~•y I~' ~ -°EOQ~ a 1 0, l9 F♦ 1 Ij vC mCm Z U ~ ~ I' 0 ~0DC0~ It ~I Yp foo STc S"B£ C ~t„ O7 C o -00 C al Im 009 .0 jS W TTT t 0 m 3mm o'oa mEt >m<r. o moI o~ m mt O N < aN p~ YT+as g`' O J U F■Y u•.~. pU9 3-1 p~0 QC o !2 Spa` Wy' r` o NmmmE a ma wa p6yx~g z o O,mmm Z n O 'iOM8 0 mm04m J s 'oP 4-9e n o c g ~ IL E fei ~mm Om Eocco j r - o 2. 8 o ouao =1f N N rl W N 61 O\ on I N N \ O ~O 0 c~: a a ~ O O U Z CD -1 coo .U Gz 0 N C W LL N LL m W eA rn Z Jfr U_ p W zZ O: zo. M' a W C.) m W < w Y r ~ b a N N o m 8 Q H ~y P o p> O IL 9' CD 7 a a. O r m I 0 e 7 i~ L L~ O 40e oL~ u° O 4 8 CD I jMr S w O Y M Y Y `mom Y e~ u° y~y O 4 H ~Y M y C g m Y w mm S. i44M 08 Y M D.. r h u a v ~.1 w Y Y Y C Y ~ h m r ~ Y 2 sL 30 ° V L U L M O E ~ ~ rl LLm c y L ~ E « ° e ~hPq(lf 6W~ v en YV££ Li o Al o p lit M- L DHL M ~.C V ~'Mc3 w ~ L C «p~ Ys8 10H 2' s 1 o Vq , Y V pi w«~ YN V YN p0YY L CC ~.qL«Y a t:E « Y Y Lrn i $gO c $ A eCY Yyp{~ W°~ a Y O~C+ Y Y M0 4 Y 0 sm UY ~ mve p L PM CVY m L'O C W 4tl~ p ) _ ) 9 • L p a C~ ` L M g O p a Y 9 Y b q L L p y y y Y L «f ~ 8 ~ w 2 m ° to 1 m4 y „ L~y $ N g QQ ~ y Dm~iWnY ~ a Y Y ~ ~ C i _ ~ ° ° ° ~Y p .YL v.. - m 3 u 2 C m- elm W Y , u N C D ` m « M L C Y p ~ BBS ~ ~ ° YI ] ••O L LO+r .G W M L Y Y ~Q O G W = L 6 L ~ Y 3 C p ~ S 1 m a (L .O~ n 6 ~ L m ~ « Wm U r L G W _ y _ .C y V6Y SwLr•CYY ~y °m c a Y u m m E 31 Y° L 6 u J N O u C Y « Y O 3 Y a°• Z J W u g n ° g ~ q pp L L L« o• ~ m . . ~ w a- Y e y r ~•r Y v 4° V Y a- W m C Y W N y C-2 y o E qa y z . -M p m 9 °y..«4mll +t-uwL OZ p DZ 2 i' L O C Y A O Y C F 't Y N J a y Y v;tQaYg'mmo R 8 ri 3gB m>F~F 3 mU vai=~ 1 p ••vwi ovg .5 au N K d V yN E NCB •Wy °C Wun C L i w ~L Y Yi L m L V sY. i D 0w c Wm L. y y i Lm~ q~YCO«~tl i ~ ~o 3 '210 ~1 5 mm y ° ~io s« z p'p L V 11,~, C L N Y ~i i p O Y 60D1 ` . ` Y L C( ~ • `+f C L L ~ y d LR O •..CZF r o.YC9o , y L yl r Y o v p x Yg z ~ om ~ o' u Y x4~ tL 7« L ` Z~ ~ ~r 3f y ~ h m 9 L~ t p 9 E m ~ WmS C 8$ y~p' pLp W ~ W a > F yL G L O L tl L O Y p L{' t ~ q Y t p y5 K N ~ t w ~ U m S t ~ p L p~ S • W f ! ~ 1 y V Y C 4 m [i F W p O ...[[[Y! ! m •F L A > q gy L ~ Y ~ q q q C ~ C Y ~ ~ E ~ t ~L « W r tl ' Y« . w we xw L R Etl mYLM ws mim a 3 m L b Y w ME b 01 N O LD N o p S °s T~4, •i Q Q = C4 a b v .-1 a~ M 0 Y~ g a LN ~SM N er4 IN 3 W i R q RU iI T A A APP Y..~ WWT DROP EDfE OF 10' ■kS LOCATION. 00401 WEL FABRICATE AND "WALL A 0EOqpARTE IRON RAR.MG SIZED TO MEET THE WUWD m Com ALOK TNtS ET ♦ Eltroq EDCE OF OUT TRW GATE COL W1 e W ~ B " C=D - T?fEF PO iq%~ P , 811E TRW out DGats TO TIE N 9+ROV~EA ev 004R. ATTAM VW RON HMCES PNGNDEG By OOIER To BE CAST INTO CONCRETE WALL. At NEW wmmw AOC 1,111m OCOEa CMSSONS 0 N' BB-OW X45 _ 4i b RLNOVE MSTINO M BE O WB 1 EASTM k IS" NNAR 4' ROC( SLAB FOM WC A CONG BENCH NM A 12' SPACE BELOW FOR NOGG SR:NAGE. SI0'PORT SLAB N RtE CENTER WM A 4' WOE WML i Site Plan /{j SCALE:.3s i -0 Q ATM CD BOOR 10 TIE PRGNGW TIT ER RCt NINO6 FRONDED BT 0 'MBE CAST Mlp CONCM]E WN1 ISOKM PREFAB PATIO FRWPV= TO ' BE NWNOW BY OMIQL W SET W 11P OF CONO SI•AB BB1CN• MIECRAIE IM CNtm MALL 1O GAlLATE ADOBE LOCO PROVIC 5,1RAM VICE W EACH SIDE W M. i SHEET INDEX: Al - SITE PLAN A2 - SUNROOM ELEVATION AS - SUNROOM SECTIONS A4 - CONC. RETAINING WALL ELEVATIONS AS - FOUNDATION AND FRAMING PLANS AB - ROOF FRAMING PLAN GENERAL NOTES, 1. THE CONTACTOR OF RECORD FOR THIS PROJECT IS: DOUBLE D CONSTRUCTION SERVICES CONTRACTOR CONTACT INFORMATION: MR. DENVER DAMS 300 S JACKSON ST., SUITE 100 DENVER. CO B0209 303-398-7078 VOICE 303-398-7001 FAX 303-358-1877 CELL 2. THESE DRAWINGS SHALL BE REVIEWED, APPROVED, AND STAMPED BY A ENGINEER UCENSED IN THE STATE OF COLORADO. WHO WILL 1$ SELECTED, AND PAID DIRECTLY BY THE CONTRACTOR OF RECORD. W z a N pr) W 3. ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS ARE APPROXIMATE AND WIL NEW TO BE FIELD VERIFIED AND ADJUSTED FOR EXISTING CONDITIONS. 4. SIZING OF ALL STRUCTURAL MEMBERS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, FOOTERS. REINFORCING. BEAMS. JOISTS, HEADERS. RAFTERS. ETC. AND SPECIFICATION OF ALL MATERIALS. CONNECTIONS, TESTING. INSTALLATION METHODS, ETC. SHAD. BE THE RESPONSIBULTY OF AN ENGINEER LICENSED IN THE STATE OF COLORADO. 5. THESE DRAWINGS WERE CREATED PER INSTRUCRONS AND SPECIFICATIONS RECEIVED BY MG DESIGN GROUP FROM THE CONTRACTOR OF RECORD FOR THIS PROJECT. 8. ALL PARTIES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, ENGINEER. AND PERMIMNG AGENCIES. SHALL HOLD HARMLESS, MG DESIGN GROUP FOR ANY ERRORS OR OMMISIONS ON THIS SET OF DRAWINGS 7. ALL WORK ON THIS PROJECT SHALL CONFORM TO ALL LOCAL CODES AND REGULATIONS PROPERTY LINE EXISTING TO REMAIN DEMOUTION '?0 NEW CONSTRUCTION ONE, Tile Wo CJ(5HE W[90 C~0~1~4G3MC~4~0[~ DO MCt~C~a`~~ DESIGN] P.a Boa Resat BROW, w aONM-Um (N>lW-axa mvAVMnt~Wro^wF•ewn IND.' RMRIm/Im. ' OaTWJ - PPOL M. MJG 2003DDO1 OEGI{ER IAtAMNG ND. DO WC THE A - 7125 W'G A 1 7 E 01 R89JE DA JUNE/ 111/2003 A AS NOTED w7 3 r,% rl 2 FIXED TRAPAZOIOAL WINDOWS 3 8._8. L~ O 3 IN 12 PITCH ROOF COMPOSITION 3 TAB SHINGLES EXTERIOR GABLE. TO BE ROUGH SAWN PINE 7 NEW 3050 WINDOWS MOVE EXIST~~J J Front Elevation MINIMUM 24" ABOVE p00R TO NEW WO: 3 IB a I FlNISHED FLOOR - LOCATION AZ D OD000`~t1La[~ G>300flD0 [~00 M. MUD DDo DDf~10`~G°30D~~©I~ 000[~DC~ i~~ 7 NEW 3050 ENDOWS MINIMUM 24" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR M VD EMS1 G N GROUP P.0. Bm Isw BwINr. GO BGJGN-W <awNu-ysn mm®wan9ewgnawo-a~m 3 CHANGES PER OWNER IAUG93 Na. ReNSim/ISSUe OGte GESSIFR Raa. rro. MJG 20030DOI WEQ¢N GNAWNG NO. DD 7125-R1,OWG SM GALE JUNE/ 18 / 2003 - SGA!£ RENSON AS NOTED GF7 3 00 REMOVE EXIST DOOR, WINDOW BELOW WINDOW. ADD NEW E HEADER REPLACE WITH FOLDING S1 DOORS SELECTED BY OWNER. NE' TO BE SIZED AND DETAILED BY d c zr 04 N,0 W J ~qqa V F O V CRITICAL DIMENSION. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY R.O. NEW INTERIOR S TO BE T&G NDOW AND WALL REPLACE WITH FRENCH DOOR Sect. A- A p; SCALE: ;5/16- - 11'-0- ~-,~7GO~(U~Vl1~Lr~-l7UV ~G~/~~~(L71(V~00 (l 1p UU E3 V-0) L~ V l50 COo wOWW 300000 POO OUCtVut MM L1 ) 1/2" PLYWOOD SHIM 2 Anchor, Detail 12' CONC. PIER - 36" DEEP SECT. 13-13 REPLACE ANY EXISTING PIERS A3 SCALE a 18~t'=o' - MG DESIGN GROUP P.Q Boa 1SB7 W BGJ4 IW7 ~(JB~t~M-JRB N~WP~ 3 CHANGES PER OWNER INW No. R W.;M.Am o wte MJG 2003DDOI DO ogmr T mm / 7125-R1.DWG 3 1S BALE JUNE/18/200 Bev n 7 AS NOTED 3 a 7 DOUBLE 2X8 RIM JOIST SIMPSON ABE44 STANDOFF POST BASE 100' - 4" mFL100'-0" r 1 OIL REMOVE EXIST DOOR. WINDOW AND WALL BELOW WINDOW. ADD NEW ENGINEERED AVER. REPLACE NTH FOLDING TORS SELECTED By OWNER- NEW STOREFRO RT R3 BE SIZED AND DETAILED BY ENGINEER. DIMENSION. TO VERIFY R.O. REMOVE WINDOW REPLACE NTH SLIDING FRENCH DOOR 3' NOM: TYP. 2, VERIFY IN FEILD UM ALL NEW HEADERS TD BE SIZED AND DETAILED BY ENGINEER. - - [Fo[EdDHLDH n'@ LD3 ~D[ D ~D M~10 225i2 DO D MwIE C~OfD`~DD4~DJ DODDNDUD 3'-8" MG V ESIGN ROUP vn m tRW M BJDM =7 (]WH+*-fix macm9Mm94^~wwwocwn 3 CHANGES PER OWNER 1W3 No. Rectebn/~ewe Oob S-8. S-8- 84 PRO1 N0. MJG 2003DDOI -505- ;A~ HE DO czm;FT 7125-RieD WG A4 X-. JUNE/ IB / 2003 AS NOTED a7 3 NEW JOISTS TERMINATE ON EXISTING ROOF 2X4 STEM WALL TO SUPPORT ROOF JOISTS. CENTER OVER EXISTING EXTERIOR WALL MATCH EXISTING SOFFIT i ROOF FRAMING PLAN A6 SCML' 3 e - T - wo ~9-- RmD M1913 @@m9 ffG°u)u@VD@m D07DMIU IEBOVK P.0. B mw BMOe. W 00]W-1'A1 (]D]HM-~ mpaygP~Paa 3 CHANCES PR 0"M 119= No. PaNVm/laaa Dab a Paoa na MJG 20030001 O!i%tx AMC N0. DD - -OEM F M 7125-Rt.DWG A5 DA ADZE/ IB/20D3 AS NOTED w7 3 1._4. APPRM I w m. law Re• Hp1LiwE e~ns[o1p°a r ~4WCw)ax " iRE A mmm> =u e a-o ,•-4~ mm. iY SIDEWALK r-A \ F ~ b IN& T -s~awop~~s E ~ y Kr-e• A r 3 r s ,aw d.6 B~_e~ tIIl rmONs w e„ C vaR110M $AD ~ R[iA"N6 wALL rows r R3w row ' i R row s• axm PWRS,C RW s PWIROR OF r w REtAMNG W" R,0' OTKIN K p g, NF 16"X36" APPROXIMATELY X7 PLANTING AREAS VERIFY OWNER NEW CONC. DRIVEWAY EXTEND CURB CUT 10' Tit 29 m❑ Q32MD &WIE0 C~OM~`t~MMC~S~~OM ©OC3MC~(~[~]~'~ -03 P ML R0. MJG 2003DO01 SO - PAMG m OD - -T5mvmT M, 7125-Rt,DWG X011E AME/ 19 / 2003 R REw9Pf / AS NOTED o"7 3 Conc. Wall PLAN A4 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-&' MG DESIGN GROUP PA 9e, te~Al eaiNr, 00 60]Op-150T (JOJ)IM-3eSe apoy~p~pC,wgpauysvn 3 CHANGES PER OMERE IAII~3 Na R"wdm/~ASU" Data 61 t ` :.5.'4:.1, 3+}•._1. '.l'T WALL FOOTING CONFIGURATION, REINFORCING, AND SIZING TO BE SPECIFIED BY ENGINEER. 9" NEW 6" THICK 4' HIGH STUCCO FINISH CONC. WALL 6 ~54AW05-/3yp~ J hw" I BY OWNER . NICHE FOR PREFAB PO BOX PROVIDED BY OWNER 7.a"0N7'0 _ GATE PROVIDED' Q' 3-0 I 'tsawQS-9 81, _j 6 NICHE FOR PREFAB PO BOX PROVIDED BY OWNER GATE PROVIDED BY OWNER NEW 6" THICK CONC. RETAINING WALL TIED TO HOUSE FOUNDATION AND OLD RETAINING WALL. EXISTING 6" THICK CONC. RETAINING WALL TO.REMAIN - .32rrprQ :ir^ _ t fr ~y~~ 1 QN low A_ 1 WALL FOOTING CONFIGURATION, REINFORCING, AND SIZING TO BE SPECIFIED BY ENGINEER. Conc. Wail Elevati A4 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" Un UC ©Ciu`~1La ] G L~=3 JC~C TU04M wo ORMB MWCo @oM~BUaU@UooM [DoWH[ELff!~f) vn eo. lssm e.da., CO a0i0 lw (awHu-ms moav~vwo~Vaowv 3 CHANGES PER OBNER l= Na BaMelm/1"ua Bab vaa. w MJG 2003DD01 ocaa w~~xo as DD 7125-R1.DWG A7 n DACE JUNE/ 18 / 200 , AS NOTED W7 3 l Case No.: App: Last Name: App: First N ame: Owne r: Last Name: Owner: First Nam e: App Addre ss: City, State Z ip: App: Pho ne: Owner Address: City/St ate/Zip: Owner Phone: Project Address: Street Name : City/State, Zip: Case Disposition: Project Planner: File Lo cation: Not es: Follow- Up: A0322 Quarter section Map N Lisa Fieldman Related Cases: Po Bill Sroufe Case Histor y: Fieldman Lisa 00 S. Jackson St., #100 Review Body: Denver, CO 80209 303-5874512 APN: 125 W. 32nd Ave. 2nd Revie w Body: heat Ridge, CO 80033 2nd Review Date 20-318-5637 Decision-making Body 126 - Appro val/Denial Date: eat 32nd Avenue heat Ridge, CO 80033 Re so/Ordinance No.: Reckert dive O.: INE Parlance to fence height tandards and waiver to 10 landscape buffer... BOA - 1213103 _ 39-261-00.240 BOA - 1213/03 Conditic if Approval: District: III _ Date Rec eived: 11/712003 Pre-App Date: F_ .1'i ri F. Vj_ . r.' i:._ R- t r..; ill_T j7p