HomeMy WebLinkAboutWA-08-13City of
~WheatR~io¢-e
7500 West 29th Avenue
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033
303.235.2846 Fax: 303.235.2857
Approval of Variance
WHEREAS, an application for a variance was submitted for the property located at 24 Hillside
drive, referenced as Case No. WA-08-13/Majerus Construction; and
WHEREAS, City staff found basis for approval of the variance, relying on criteria listed in Section
26-115 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws and on information submitted in the case file; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has properly notified adjacent property
owners pursuant to Section 26-109 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws; and
WHEREAS, there were no registered objections regarding the application;
NOW THEREFORE, be it hereby resolved that a variance of up to ten (10) inches from the
required fifteen (15) foot side yard setback; reduced from fifteen (15) feet to fourteen (14) feet two
(2) inches (Case No. WA-08-13/Majerus) is granted for the property located at 24 Hillside Drive to
construct a single family residence, as described, based on the following findings of fact:
1. The request would not alter the essential character of the locality.
2. The applicant is proposing substantial investment in the property.
3. There is a unique hardship that the property owner is not responsible for that may create
a difficult economic situation and delay the project.
4. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare and would not be injurious to
neighboring property or improvements.
5. A 10 inch encroachment into the required 15 foot side setback will have a minimal
impact.
6. There have been no protests submitted during the ten-day public notification period.
11-17-0
Date
u~~ WHEGr~Om
C~~ORA00
TO:
CASE NO. & NAME:
ACTION REQUESTED:
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT
Case File
CASE MANAGER: Jeff Hirt
WA-08-13/Majerus DATE:
November 12, 2008
Approval of a variance of variance of up to 10 inches from the required 15 foot side yard
setback resulting in a 14 foot 2 inch side yard setback on property located at 24 Hillside
Drive and zoned Residential One (R-1).
LOCATION OF REQUEST:
24 Hillside Drive
APPLICANT (S):
Majerus Construction, Jon Majerus
OWNER (S):
Eugene and Ann Fletcher
APPROXIMATE AREA:
20,212 (.46 acres)
PRESENT ZONING:
Residential One (R-1)
PRESENT LAND USE:
Single Family Residential
ENTER INTO RECORD:
(X) CASE FILE & PACKE
T MATERIALS
(X) ZONING ORDINANCE
Location Man
All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, an administrative decision may be made on
this request.
1. REQUEST
The applicant is requesting approval of a variance of up to 10 inches from the required 15 foot side yard setback
resulting in a 14 foot 2 inch side yard setback (Exhibit 1, Letter of Request). The purpose of the variance is to
allow the construction of a single family dwelling where a foundation has been poured at an incorrect location
with an approved building permit (Exhibit 2, Approved Site Plan).
Section 26-115.C (Variances and Waivers) of the Wheat Ridge City Code allows that the Director of
Community Development (Director) may grant administrative variances from the strict application of the
zoning district development standards. Administrative variances are allowed for up to 50% of the development
standard. All other development standards have been met.
II. CASE ANALYSIS
Existing Site Conditions
Jon Majerus of Majerus Construction is requesting this variance on behalf of the property owners, Eugene and
Ann Fletcher. The subject property is 102 feet wide along Hillside Drive by 185 feet deep at its deepest point
and 20,212 square feet in total area (Exhibit 3, Improvement Location Certificate). The single family dwelling
previously on this property was demolished for the new structure proposed. This demolition permit was issued
on August 13, 2008. As of this date, the only improvement on the property consists of a poured foundation for
the new single family structure.
Case History
Subsequent to the demolition of the existing single family dwelling, a building permit for a new single family
dwelling on the subject property was submitted on July 7, 2008, with the permit being issued on August 25,
2008. The plans were approved by all necessary departments with some comments and conditions (Exhibit 4
Building Permit Approval).
As the general contractor, Majerus Construction, moved forward with the project and poured the foundation an
Improvement Location Certificate (ILC) was prepared to verify that the foundation was poured in the correct
place per the approved plans (See Exhibit 3, ILC). The ILC however revealed that the foundation had been
poured incorrectly, encroaching 10 inches into the north setback. As the property is zoned Residential One (R-
1), the side yard setback is 15 feet. The foundation has been poured at 14 feet 2 inches from the north property
line (Exhibit Site:Photos). The Community Development Department learned of this error on Thursday,
October 23, 2008. On the following day a stop work order was issued on the project.
It is important to note that at the time of application for this building permit, the Community Development
Department did not have a policy or requirement that a survey or ILC be submitted to verify the dimensions and
location of the poured foundation for this project. Thus, the applicant volunteered this information to the
department for evaluation and consultation on next steps. Without this policy in place, the Planning Division
would conduct a site inspection prior to approval of a Certificate of Occupancy but would have no definitive
means to ascertain the precise setbacks.
Alternatives
The Community Development Department consulted with the applicant, property owner, and the Chief Building
Official to determine the alternatives and approximate costs. The two alternatives are as follows:
Administrative Variance
Case No. WA-08-13IMajerus
1. Remove and replace the foundation with site improvements essentially starting over. The cost of this
process, according to the general contractor and the Chief Building Official, would be between $30,000
and $40,000.
2. Apply for an administrative variance to allow the 10 inch encroachment into the side yard setback.
Adjacent Properties
All properties on all sides of the subject property have R-1 zoning and are single family dwellings. The
property to the north sits at or more than 15 feet from the south property line (See Exhibit 6, Site Photos). The
height of the structure is approximately 24 feet at the peak of the roof, well below the maximum 35 foot height
in the R-1 zone district. All other development standards have been met with this request. No objections were
received during the 10 day posting period. There was one letter in support of the request received from a
property owner at 9 Skyline Drive, directly behind the subject property (Exhibit 6, Letter of Support).
VARIANCE CRITERIA
In order to authorize an administrative variance, the Director must determine that the majority of the "criteria
for review" listed in Section 26-115.C.4 of the City Code have been met. Staff provides the following review
and analysis of the variance criteria.
The property in question would not yield a reasonable return in use, service, or income if
permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is
located.
The property could still be used as a single family residence without the need for a variance. The
foundation could be replaced and/or modified without the variance. However, the replacement and/or
modification of the foundation would be a substantial cost - approximately $30,000 to $40,000 based on
discussions with the Chief Building Official and the general contractor for the project.
Staff finds that this criterion has not been met.
2. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality.
The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. A 10" encroachment into the
required 15 foot setback would have a very minimal impact on the area.
Staff finds that this criterion has been met.
3. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property with this application, which
would not be possible without the variance.
This project represents significant investment in the community. Substantial additional investment that
may take away from the overall investment will be required without the variance. If the variance is not
approved, the foundation will have to be reconstructed which will be a substantial expense for the
applicant and may take away from investment elsewhere in the property. The additional investment
would be approximately $30,000 to $40,000 to reconstruct the foundation based on discussions with the
Chief Building Official and the general contractor, unless another solution is arrived at by the structural
engineer. This number may be substantial enough to impact the feasibility of the project.
Staff finds this criterion has been met.
Administrative Variance
Case No. WA-08-13/Majerus
4. The particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property
involved results in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a
mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out.
There are no unique conditions related to physical surrounding, shape, or topographical conditions that
create a hardship. There is a unique hardship in that a mistake was made by the foundation contractor -
not the property owner - which will create a difficult economic situation without the variance as well as
delaying the project to enable the owners to move into the house.
Staff finds this criterion has been met.
5. The alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest
in the property.
The hardship was created by a person having an interest in the property. The foundation contractor has
created the hardship, and as a subcontractor to the general contractor they have an interest in the
property.
Staff finds this criterion has not been met.
6. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other
property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located, by, among other
things, substantially or permanently impairing the appropriate use or development of adjacent
property, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, substantially
increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing the danger of fire or endangering the
public safety, or substantially diminishing or impairing property values within the neighborhood.
The request would not be detrimental to public welfare and would not be injurious to neighboring
property or improvements. It would not hinder or impair the development of the adjacent property. The
adequate supply of air and light would not be compromised as a result of this request. The request
would not increase the congestion in the streets, nor would it increase the danger of fire. The request
will most likely not have an effect on property values in the neighborhood. The setback encroachment
of 10" is minimal when compared to the 15 foot required setback.
Staff finds that this criterion has been met.
7. The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are present in the
neighborhood and are not unique to the property.
The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are not present in the
neighborhood and are unique to the subject property.
Staff finds that this criterion has not been met.
8. Granting of the variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities.
Staff finds that this criterion is not applicable. Single family dwellings are not subject to accessibility
requirements.
Administrative Variance 4
Case No. WA-08-13/Majerus
9. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the
Architectural and Site Design Manual.
Staff finds this criterion is not applicable as the variance request involves a single family dwelling.
III. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Having found the application in compliance with the majority of the review criteria, staff recommends approval
of the variance request. Staff has found that there are unique circumstances attributed to this request that would
warrant approval of a variance. Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL for the following reasons:
1. The request would not alter the essential character of the locality.
2. The applicant is proposing substantial investment in the property.
3. There is a unique hardship that the property owner is not responsible for that may create a difficult
economic situation and delay the project.
4. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare and would not be injurious to neighboring
property or improvements.
5. A 10 inch encroachment into the required 15 foot side setback will have a minimal impact.
6. There have been no protests submitted during the ten-day public notification period.
Administrative Variance 5
Case No. WA-08-13IMajerus
EXHIBIT 1: LETTER OF REQUEST
10/30/08
Jeff Hirt
City of wheat Ridge-planning
7500 w. 2e Ave.
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
DearJeff,
It was nice speaking with you today. i want to thank you again for all of your due c0ligence regarding
this unfortunate situation. I have reviewed the variance criteria and have the following comments to
address some of those. At this point, a variance application has not been completed as I have not been
told to do so, but I can certainly get that done if that is something I need to do. Please advise what steps
1 creed to take on this. Below, I will make comments on the variance criteria. Hopefully we can work
something outI
A) The Issue we have with this relates to the future use of the space as set forth in the plats. R the
foundation has to be torn out and replaced at that area of encroachment, we would lose at least
10" of finished space in both the master bathroom and master closet areas. This space would
definitely be noticed as the space allotted is not all that large to began with. Additionally, the
space would also be lost in the basement which is slated to be firdshed as a spare bedroom. I
am not sure at this point what decision the homeowner would make regarding this issue. They
may require the entire foundation to be removed,
B) The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. The north setback
requirement is 15 feet. we are currently encroaching into the setback 95 Inches, This
represents an overall percentage of encroachment of 5.3% which is minimal. Visually, there
would be no issues as there is plenty of space between this home and the home to the north.
C) Obviously, there is a substantial investment In the property. The unfortunate Issue for us is
there will be significant cost Increases to the project if-we are not allowed the variance. The
worst case scenario involves tearing out the entire foundation which cost $85,500 to install, plus
costs to tear it out and all the time lost. The other fact involves the caissons that were poured,
We installed 43 caissons at 25 feet in length, and drilling new caissons a foot away from each
other may be difficult to accomplish. If we are able to orgy remove and replace the foundation
wail that encroaches onto the north property one, we run the risk of harming the structural
Integrity of the existireourndation as there is an ample amount of steel in this foundation
because of the soils Issues. I would have to discuss this with the strumnal engineer. The
variance would provide an economical solution to the problem and save the homeowner a lot of
anguish and stress with the building of their dream home. Also, the delays in time with having
to redo the foundation would force the homeowner into charging their lease considerations on
the townhome they are temporarily living in.
D) The topography and shape of the kit have been dealt with prior to this and did not present a
major hardship at the time. The current hardship involves the significant costs to fix the
situation and the emotional stress it would cause the homeowner due to the time delays. The
homeowners also are scheduled to adopt another child next year in China {I thirds its China) and
this maydiarupt those plans as they wanted to get settled Into their new home before the child
Comes time.
E) The person that has an interest in this property Is the homeowner as this is their dream hone
they have been planning foryears, This hardship Is not at all their fault, but the fault of human
error on the construction side.
Case No. WA-08-13/Majerus
F) As mentioned in line 11, there is still plenty of room between the homes on the north property
line. The benefit of having the foundation shifted to the north by 16" is it gives the homeowner
a little more room to maneuver their vehicles in to the side load garage which is always how the
home on this property was positioned. Due to the shape of the lot, there was never a lot of
room for turning a vehicle into the garage, but the extra 16 Inches will aid in this.
G) f am trying to find some information on this as to whether variances have been allowed on other
properties In years past. At the current time, I do not have examples that show allowances of
variances to other properties, but am looking into it. Is there any way to find out at the City of
Wheat Ridge if variances have been allowed?
H) Currently, the homeowners do not have a disability, but if the variance were not allowed, and
we moved only the foundation vrall in violation of the setback, it would create limited room in
the master bathroom and closet areas that may be an Issue for a disabled person down the
read.
1) The plan has passed all planning and zoning retlulrements as per the permit requirements. If a
variance is allowed, everything would follow and be built per the plan submitted and will blend
In very well with the existing community.
Thank you very much far your consideration regarding this issue. If you have any questions or need
anything from me, please call me at 724-280-8555• Take care]
sincerely,
J6n Wo
president/Majerua Construction
Administrative Variance 7
Case No. WA-08-13/Majerus
Administrative Variance
Case No. WA-08-13/Majerus
ARCHrrEMRAL
~yturf 8 ROCF PLAN
t~_
EXHIBIT 3: ILC
aim Ybfl Cd1w .lnM AYiT. S0. Ww.oa~ fnisatu IWIS
13L sN-s.V-efl1. PI% .»Wd~_ew3
rypaw~ww eenu nN
C 61MNSM
hnh~h
°
~
y
o ~
r eeea. w.
Peiaps
o MNN pn
.
~
"
~
.
.
1p~
o
11
o
4 umi..
,
N.SJ6~& .7
4.
Sfwd
{,1 f11tl6u Nebr
Q
usw ceswankft
lOT 1. ft B, AARNIiOtMT MEOITS PAR, 2
oounrr uF .~F PAPA
f rw.igry•
twin GW
3W
wr ears
aw J'P IrWhUrCN OWY
LW A WON 8
»
At
n.Y
I"=30'
.,or $
YIIOi0i1,14UM ®{IMV
Mid
Nd110t AOCCNOIN6 70 i. wMM" USA
is
C~ ~ l4'd1~A1'f LFSCCP~W il~R
di 1NLllh1 HiANl NSR[CIE4
9
EXHIBIT 4: BUILDING PERMIT APPROVAL
7500 W. 28" Ave.. Wheat Rirlpe, Co 80033
Cdoe: 303-235-2855*Fox: 30"35.2$57 AVna k
tnspeeWn.Lkw 303.234.5033 ~amarra nP LFI.t#
Bultdlrog Permit Wleatlon
PMpWyAddloW
'2 "A .ta~L auro~_ Gil~~•$
Malone AdtO m: idldAW" tlmn ompmry a ftsV
Waatrpsca(aoss+spW): Nei am
Ds"dpdon of warf
01uwflse s 177+1
LV.Our
rmrmmNw4w! t+1dli ~ w,red''-war..
24}tA"iCOVAU1g8:
zww. R-1
x"".141°iplL
``*us f1
DEPARONEWT USE ONLY
9
koo*Ate#; L s*erv
ar;*r oij ti►Els.wf y
Ow
fplOrYARlE~p3 C4Y9i5plS
rt~lt.~f m~mwaweo ~a~
Administrative Variance 10
Case No. WA-08-13/Majerus
CMUC Oft- QYWO6R! reM`ATS_Ati1~'O_R} E,+s'r?-eMf4AlAtRrA e ~9^rATIM6.d1CYA 1} /T(~~y ~,y
1~~ C 1'I~G1l S16llpr4H~: R~r ~..~f/ '~!r. 'fE
Administrative Variance ] j
Case No. WA-08-13/Majerus
Administrative Variance 12
Case No. WA-08-13/Majerus
EXHIBIT 6: LETTER OF SUPPORT
City of Wheat Ridge M micipal Building 7500 W. 2H'' Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 3031352846 i:: 303,235.2857
CERTIFIED LE'i"fER NOTICE
November 3, 2008
Dear Property Owner:
This is to inform you of Case No. WA-08-13, a variance of up to 10 inches from
the required 15 foot side yard setback resulting in a 14 foot 2 inch side yard
setback on property located at 24 Hillside Drive and zoned Residential One (R-1).
The applicant for this case is requesting an administrative variance review which
allows no more than a fifty percent (50%) variance to be granted by the Zoning
Administrator without need for a public hearing. Prior to the rumdeting of a
decision, all adiacent~ r~ ron~ erly owners are required to be notified of the request
by certified mail.
If you have any questions, please contact the Planning Division at 303-235-2846 or
if you would like to submit comments concerning this request, please do so in
writing by 5:00 p.m. on November 12, 2008.
Thank you.
AV.ABtlpj.itdi~ilq
r.[nsazls~t
WA0813_do 't rw
6...4
it
W`
r
aw e COA.r ,
t ✓ a
Or dr,.<af IV bef.~.r
wx1r ri.whefi .CO.us
j'v j g q eky11N e...e
Administrative Variance 13
Case No. WA-08-13/Majerus
POSTING CERTIFICATION
CASE NO. WA-N-I~
DEADLINE FOR WRITTEN COMMENTS: f i 1 tZ fO
I, ITU " M p
(name)
/Z1
residing at `d`t'to S. 3b 1`. S o Na c~- . L ~4-4 u L--, Cz,
(address)
as the applicant for Case No.
hereby certify that I have posted the sign for
Public Notice at (S (R Qn L^ k t4 ~ R` J-1 C cb
f1
(location)
on this 'I r-d _ day of &-t1 V-~ri 610e- , 20 0 $ , and do hereby certify that
said sign has been posted and remained in place for ten (10) days prior to and including the
deadline for written comments regarding this case. The sign was posted in the position shown on
the map below.
Signature:
NOTE: This form must be submitted to the Community Development
and will be placed in the applicant's case file.
(k,S MAP
~ r
t
r! ~ r
1 S 1 n-P D/'
for this case
C
L
FLETCHER EUGENE E
FLETCHER ANN S
24 HILLSIDE DR
WHEAT RIDGE CO 80215
VISNAK ROSEMARY
26 HILLSIDE DR
WHEAT RIDGE CO 80215
HOLLENBECK LYLE E
22 HILLSIDE DR
WHEAT RIDGE CO 80215
MCNULTY PHILIP J
MCNULTY DEBORAHJ
9 SKYLINE DR
WHEAT RIDGE CO 80215
ROBERTS DAVID B
ROBERTS MARILYN V
7 SKYLINE DR
WHEAT RIDGE CO 80215
KUROBANESADAHARU
KUROBANESACHIKO
HUDSON MICHAEL CO TRUSTEE
23 HILLSIDE DR
WHEAT RIDGE CO 80215
DECKARD VIRGINIA C
21 HILLSIDE DR
WHEAT RIDGE CO 80215
MC ATEE JEANETTE ANN
19 HILLSIDE DR
WHEAT RIDGE CO 80215
39-284-16-027
39-284-16-028
39-284-16-026
39-284-16-033
39-284-16-034
39-284-15-008
39-284-15-009
39-284-15-010
7008 015D 0003 4502 7989
0
G
Sps ~
7008 0150 0003 4502 7996
7008 0150 0003 4502 8009
7008 0150 0003 4502 8016
7008 0150 0003 4502 8023
7008 0150 0003 4502 8030
7008 0150 0003 4502 8047
7008 0150 OD03 4502 8054
City of
`Wheat~,dge
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 291" Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857
CERTIFIED LETTER NOTICE
November 3, 2008
Dear Property Owner:
This is to inform you of Case No. WA-08-13, a variance of up to 10 inches from
the required 15 foot side yard setback resulting in a 14 foot 2 inch side yard
setback on property located at 24 Hillside Drive and zoned Residential One (R-1).
The applicant for this case is requesting an administrative variance review which
allows no more than a fifty percent (50%) variance to be granted by the Zoning
Administrator without need for a public hearing. Prior to the rendering of a
decision, all adjacent property owners are required to be notified of the request
by certified mail.
If you have any questions, please contact the Planning Division at 303-235-2846 or
if you would like to submit comments concerning this request, please do so in
writing by 5:00 p.m. on November 12, 2008.
Thank you.
WA0813.doc
www.ci.wheatridge.co.us
NE 26
n7
N
3
N
OFFICIAL
ZONING MAP
WHEAT RIDGE
COLORADO
PARCEULOT BOUNDARY
(DESIGNATES OWNERSHIP)
WATER FEATURE
* DENOTES MULTIPLE ADDRESSES
100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN
(APPROXIMATE LOCATION)
SE 28
0 100 200 '.co 400 Feet.
WHGIp
DEPARTMENT OF MAP ADOPTED: June 15, 1994
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Last Revision: September 10, 2001
LAND USE CASE PROCES-SING APPLICATION
Community Development Department
7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Phone (303) 235-2846
(Please print or type all information)
Applicant M yj rvS Cvvs4r ,o o, Address 44No r- 4„ rV^ t 7 Phone72e-Z8b-Fbb.s
City t , 4-q l e4ew State Co Zip q-0 12 3 Fax 301 -gY9 - Sfr 7
Owner Qua `f A d c k1t f' Address Phone 3 -74s-7z 42
City
Contact S etti W'4 J e rvS Address y~ Y S- 36t' l l' C { Phone'?za -2Y6"8 6
City t_,4-+l--t J%, State CO Zip lZ-~ Fax 3- 9.114117
(The person listed as contact will be contacted to answer questions regarding this application, provide additional information when necessary, post
public hearing signs, will receive a copy of the staff report prior to Public Hearing, and shall be responsible for forwarding all verbal and written
communication to applicant and owner.)
Location of request (address): 2 Lf « 1 l s t o e or , 1~k e4 d R' d 4" C ID F't -Z1 S-
Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request):
Application submittal requirements on reverse side
❑ Change of zone or zone conditions ❑ Special Use Permit
❑ Consolidation Plat ❑ Subdivision: Minor (5 lots or less)
❑ Flood Plain Special Exception ❑ Subdivision: Major (More than 5 lots)
❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Right of Way Vacation
❑ Planned Building Group ❑ Tem~porary Use, Building, Sign
❑ Site Development Plan approval O- Variance/Waiver (from Section )
❑ Other:
Detailed description of
1-1 4.r a V4~14. C?_ o,,,d-L,s
day of ML~_ 120 ~
Required information:
Assessors Parcel Number:
Current Zoning: 1~ °L
Current Use:
Size of Lot (acres or square footage): . 6 7 6
Proposed Zoning:
Proposed Use:
I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge
and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above,
without whose consent the requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners
must submit power-of-attorney from the owner which approved of this action on his behalf.
Signature of
~N
I
. tiuBUG.
To be filled out by staff:
L, e
expires a
Date received /d1)169' Fee $ o~-~-O_Receipt No._C~/9 Case No.
Comp Plan Desig. Zoning C/ Quarter Section Map
Related Case No. Pre-App Mtg. Date Case Manager
Page 1 of 1
Jeff Hirt
From: Fletcher, Gene [Gene. Fl etcher@gwest.com]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 8:54 AM
To: Jeff Hirt
Cc: mojomajician@yahoo.com
Subject: Set back Variance for 24 hillside
Jeff,
I am the owner of 24 Hillside Drive, Wheatridge Colorado. I approve my builder, Jon Majerus to apply for a set
back variance for the north wall foundation.
Please let me know if I need to do anything else to help expedite this process. I will be speaking to the neighbors
this afternoon.
Gene Fletcher
home 303-232-3528
cell 303-995-7242
This communication is the property of Qwest and may contain confidential or privileged information.
Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received
this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies
of the communication and any attachments.
10/31/2008
FROM
(TUE)NOV 4 2008 9:54/ST. 9:54/Ho.7500000900 P 2
QMCLATM DEED
THIS DEED, made this 3rd day of September, 2008 Between
Eugene E. Fletcher
Whose legal address is: 24Hillside Drive, Wheat Ridge, CO 80215
Of the County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, Grantor and
Eugene E. Fletcher and Ann S. Fletcher, asjoint tenants
Whose legal address is: 24 Hillside Drive, Wheat Ridge, CO 80215
Of the County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, Grantee.
Witness, that the grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and NO/100ths ($10.00) DOid.ARS, the receipt
and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, has remised, released, sold and QUITCLAIMED, and by these
presents does remise, release, sell, and QUITCLAIM unto the grantee, his/her heirs, successors and assigns forever, all
the right, title, interest, claim, and demand which the grantor has in and to the real property, togetber with improvements,
if any, situate, lying and being in the County of JEFFERSON, and State of Colorado, described as follows:
LOT 4, BLOCK 8, PARAMOUNT HEIGHTS, PART TWO, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF
COLORADO.
Also known by street and number as: 24 Hillside Drive, Wheat Ridge, CO 80215
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same, together with all and singular the appurtenances and privileges thereunto
belonging, or in anywise thereunto appertaining, and all the estate, right, , title, interest and claim whatsoever of the
grantor, either in law or equity, to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of the grantee, his/her heirs, successors and
assigns forever.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the grantor has executed this deed on the date set forth above.
EugerE. Fletcher
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF DENVER
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 3ry of September, 2008 by Eugene E. Fletcher,
SEAL.
Notary
B EPUBL C
M 4 ommis
STATE OF CdLORAOO
ITV CDIiIM~SION EXPIRES Wi7rM2
~Z 9f'l $ W o
c J w~
<
o a o h FQ' aia
I N J r'd~~m O Z ?i
N m
o0 OV `-^0P
a zaoz_~ <o
o dm o ab
f " 06aLINx zm~
Z of =
w.s~cFW I0~9
Date 0 N z~ ly :4 -..tT o'~ oa7S
Z aW ~O N a~~ W"m<
lb m
~wwga r°
F ro~ Sf ^i
~ } ars.,.. zw
YLLI
JO ^O• J SOS! BG ~~j~'/(1l' 1ll.ei)~3H`z
JS m az,
CW7 00 ,y F mmoz~o o c~a G7
7 JU C0. N Q O.
3~ZmOm °W
a~v Z z ~ow'~~m rO
10
-c'"N 2 o F~ z b'~ WE
N! FNaFpIR QO Iil w M mow
o m ~af`on 0 oid 18mo
19. z 013
-W F5
Z~ =W6
° 4y~ I-'~tw 4!
z 4 m U Z r
j v^ m f1YJ ~NQQ 3 m
1S °o n Q ~ Q > n ` ° O p~-p
° ao 0 0n~~ Fl J aF, w0Fj o <
J $U }O
r UU 4 r MZ'Z~Wrs rc~r
° a =Wr~ O~K
O f~ F0~~~~ UywjU
° 7 x
~i ° I w~a o E O~O/OS sl 7 F~!-~w °~J
n U Q
$ my rnC E °c~w g5~wx~ k'b
CY)
x E ~ooE9 ~7 >~•a~i O°pd, Wa<
ozi
Fmo
Ls U: F
w oil 9 11 9 u:m \ l\ -~IONaiZ D i ?
m J WUp°UUIi~ /
Case No.: A0813 ! Quarter Section Map No.: E28
App: Last Name: Majerus Construction Related Cases:
App: First Name: clo Jon Ma'erus J Case History: 10 inch side yard setback
Owner: Last Name: Fletcher Parlance ...deadline to
object 11112108...
Owner: First Name: Gene&Ann
App Address: 40 S_Johnson Ct____! Review Body: dm_
City, State Zip: Littleton, CO.80123__.__; _
App: Phone: 20 280-6665 J APN: 39.28416-027
Owner Address: 24 Hillside Dr.2nd Review Body:
City/State/Zip; heat Ridge, C080215i 2nd Review Date: !
Owner Phone: 03-995-7242 !
Decision-making Body: Project Address: 4
Approval/Denial Date:
Street Name: H_illside_Drive_
City/State, Zip: heat Ridge, C080215 ResolOrdinance No.:
Case Disposition: Conditions of Approval:
District:
Project Planner: Hirt
File Location: ctive Date Received: 1013112008_ _
Notes:
Follow-Up: Pre-App Date: _-.,,..,.,_,_7
_I
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
10/31/08 11:50 All edbb
Majerus Construction
RECEIPT NO:CDDOO0919 AMOUNT
FMSD ZONING APPLICATION F 200.00
zone
PAYMENT RECEIVED AMOUNT
CK 2259 200.00
TOTAL 200.00