HomeMy WebLinkAboutWA-01-01/Z t_~_c
MEMORANDUM
To: Alan White, Director of Planning and Development
From: Paul Kennebeck~
Date: April 2, 2002
RE: Ankoviak vs. Board of Adjustment
The Jefferson County District Court upheld the decision of the Board of Adjustment
and denied the appeal of the Ankoviaks in the case of Stan and Shayne Ankoviak vs. the Board
of Adjustment of the City of Wheat Ridge.
As I am sure you remember, the Ankoviaks sought a variance to expand their existing
garage 10 feet into a 15 foot sideyard setback. After hearing the evidence, five members of
the Board voted for the variance and two voted against it. Six affirmative votes are required to
approve a variance and so the request was denied.
The Ankoviaks filed a Complaint under C.R.C.P. Rule 106(a)(4), which is an appeal of
the Board's decision based on the Record. The Court carefully reviewed the Record (guided
by our Briefs in support of the Board) and found that there was sufficient evidence in the
Record to support the Board's decision.
Two unusual aspects of the case were that the Ankoviaks insisted they had a right to
add to the Record Board findings that occurred as a result of a hearing in 1992 on a
neighboring property. That issue was Briefed separately by the parties and the Court ruled in
favor of Wheat Ridge and prohibited the 1992 Board Findings from becoming part of the
Record.
A second issue was that the Ankoviaks argued it is necessary for a Board to make
Findings to support its decision and, in this case, no such Findings were made. The reason no
Findings were made was that an affirmative motion was made by the Board but the affirmative
motion failed to pass because of an insufficient number of votes. Again (with the help of our
Briefs), the Court relied on previous Colorado law that indicated a lay Board such as the
Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment does not have to make Findings if the basis for the Findings
is explicit in the evidence presented to the Board and in the discussion by the Board.
The Ankoviaks have forty-five days from the date of the Court Order to appeal to the
Court of Appeals. It would seem to me that it would not be worthwhile for them to do this.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
cc: Gerald Dahl
PFK\53027.11\406218.02
DISTRICT COURT, JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORADO
Jefferson County District Court
100 Jefferson County Parkway
Golden, CO 80401
Plaintiffs:
STAN AND SHAYNE ANKOVIAK
Defendant:
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF WHEAT
' CourtUse Only
RIDGE
Case No. OICV 1247
Division 5
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff's appeal pursuant to
C.R.C.P. Rule 106. After reviewing the briefs, record on appeal, and applicable law, the
Court hereby DENIES the appeal and UPHOLDS the decision of Defendant Board of
Adjustment of the City of Wheat Ridge ("the Board").
The scope of review by a District Court in a proceeding under C.R.C.P. Rule
106(a)(4) is limited to a determination of whether the tribunal has exceeded its
jurisdiction or abused its discretion. Judicial review is to determine is there is any
competent evidence to support the decision of the Board. Board of County
Commissioners ofLarimer County v. Conder, 927 P.2d 1339 (Colo. 1996). No
competent evidence means that the ultimate decision of the administrative body is so
devoid of evidentiary support that it can only be explained as an arbitrary and capricious
exercise of authority. Ross v. Fire and Police Pension Association,; 713 P.2d 1304 (Colo.
1986).
Plaintiffs sought approval from the Board for a zoning variance to expand their
existing garage ten feet into a fifteen foot side yard setback. At the hearing, the Board
introduced the staff report, heard oral reports from staff members, and held discussion on
the matter. Five members voted for the variance, two voted against it. Under Board
procedure, six affirmative votes are required to approve a variance, and so the request
was denied.
Plaintiffs claim that the Board's denial was made without making any findings
that supported the denial of the variance. When reviewing the actions of quasi-judicial
actions under C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4), the absence of express findings by a lay board does not
affect the validity of the decision where the necessary findings are implicit in the action
taken. Hudspeth v. Board of County Commissioners, 667 P. 2d 775 (Colo. App. 1983) at
778.
At the hearing, staff member Mary Austin reviewed the staff report for the Board,
presented slides of the property, and reviewed the variance request evaluation criteria.
The staff report introduced into the hearing record indicated that the requested variance
did not meet the criteria. It stated that a variance could alter the essential character of the
neighborhood, that the applicant had created a self imposed hardship through the desire to
increase the garage, that there could be a potential problem with drainage that would
adversely affect the neighboring property, and that the garage addition would benefit the
applicant but would not have any beneficial effects on the neighborhood. Based on these
criteria, the staff recommended denial of the request.
The Board members considered and discussed these recommendations. They also
discussed the criteria and whether the requested variance met those criteria. Several
Board members expressed concern over the impact of the addition on drainage, light, and
air. These concerns are proper under Criteria number 5. The record contains ample
support for the vote recommending denial by Board member Echelmeyer. He stated that
the hardship was self-imposed. He also stated that this request for variance was basically
for the purpose of expanding a garage. Granting a variance in a situation would
eventually wipe out the set backs between properties, and adversely impact the
neighborhood by eliminating set backs as well as possibly causing drainage problems.
All of these stated reasons show that there was competent evidence for Board member
Echelmeyer's vote against the variance.
While not all Board members made express findings, the necessary findings are
implicit in the discussion amongst the Board members as well as the staff report and
presentation by staff member Mary Austin. There is sufficient competent evidence to
support the Board's decision. The Board did not exceed its jurisdiction or abuse its
discretion. Accordingly, the Board's decision is upheld.
DONE AND SIGNED thist_ day of 12002.
BY THE COURT:
a,
Frank Plaut
District Court Judge
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
I certify that a true and correct copy of the ORDER OF COURT was deposited on the
,,O,q day of2002, in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the
following:
Paul Kennebeck
Gorsuch Kirgis LLP
Tower I, Suite 1000
1515 Arapahoe St.
Denver, CO 80202
Richard Hill
Clanahan, Tanner, Downing & Knowlton, P.C.
730 17' St, Suite 500
Denver, CO 80202-3580
dy Monteith, Law Clerk
DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON,
STATE OF COLORADO
5';. t 2~ Fi1 26
Jefferson County Court & Administrative Facility
100 Jefferson County Parkway
CO.
Golden, Colorado 80401
Plaintiff(s):
STAN AND SHAYNE ANKOVIAK
V.
Defendant(s):
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF WHEAT
RIDGE
n COURT USE ONLY n
Richard H. Hill, Esq.
Clanahan, Tanner, Downing & Knowlton, P.C.
Case Numb
r ~/1
~l V I f
730 17th Street, Suite 500
T
Denver, Colorado 80202-3580
Telephone: (720) 359-9500
Facsimile: (720) 359-9501
E-Mail: rhill@ctdk.com
Attorney Registration Number: 5773
Division:
MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OF RECORD UNDER C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4)(III)
PLAINTIFFS, through their attorneys Clanahan Tanner Downing & Knowlton, P.C., in
support of this Motion for Certification of Record under C.R.C.P 106(a)(4)(III), hereby
request that the record in this matter include the following:
1. File maintained by the City of Wheat Ridge Planning and Zoning Department relative
to the Plaintiffs' request for variance, including but not limited to:
a. Plaintiffs' letter requesting a variance and the Application related thereto;
b. Letters from the City of Wheat Ridge to the Plaintiffs related to their request;
c. Notice of hearing related to the Plaintiffs' request;
d. Letters from neighboring landowners related to the Plaintiffs' request;
e. Letter and Memorandum from the Wheat Ridge City Forester;
f. Planning Division Staff Report related to the Plaintiffs' request;
g. Maps and plats related to the Plaintiffs' request;
h. Photographs related to the Plaintiffs' request;
100299025.DOC;1)
Motion Page 1
i. Board of Adjustment Staff Report and Board of Adjustment Meeting Minutry dated
April 23, 1992, relating to similar request for a side yard setback variance fur 12081
W. 32nd Drive.
2. Certificate of Resolution of the City of Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment r0l;ite,l to
Plaintiffs' request for variance.
3. Minutes of the April 26, 2001 meeting of the City of Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment
4. Verbatim transcript or tape recording of that portion of the April 26, 2001 1110Cting
devoted to the Plaintiffs' request for variance.
5. Notes of the April 26, 2001 meeting taken by staff members of the Planning and
Zoning Office, if any.
6. Packet of materials provided by the City of Wheat Ridge Planning and 7,uning
Department to all applicants for variances.
7. Relevant portions of the City of Wheat Ridge ordinances, including but not Ilii1itcd to
relevant portions of the zoning ordinance.
100 2 9 9 025.DOC;11
Respectfully submitted:
Clanahan Tanner Downing & Knowlton, D.C;,• .
By: Richard H. Hill #5773
Motion Page 2
Transcript of Case No. WA-01-01 heard before the Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment on
April 26, 2001. Board members present: Tom Abbott, Michelle Brown, Paul Drda, Bill
Echelmeyer, Paul Hovland, Bob Howard and Jerry Montoya. Board members absent:
Kent Young. Staff members present: Alan White, Planning Director; Mary Austin,
Planner; Travis Crane, Planner; Mike Pesicka, Planning Technician; Ann Lazzeri,
Secretary
Bob Howard: Okay, we'll start with Case No. WA-01-01. Can we hear the presentation
from staff, please?
MaryAustin: Case No. WA-01-01 is a request for a ten-foot side yard setback variance
from the fifteen-foot side yard setback requirement in an R-one zone which will reduce
the setback to five feet for the purpose of expanding an attached garage. I have the
property outlined in blue, or highlighted in blue on the overhead. The location of the
request is 12141 West 32"d Drive. The applicant and owner of the property is Shayne
Ankoviak. The approximate area of the lot is 15,148 square feet. The present zoning is
R-one. The surrounding zoning is also R-one on all four sides of the property. The
existing land use on the property is currently single family residential and the entire
neighborhood, the current land use is also single family residential. This case has been
published, the property has been posted and legal notices have been sent. At this time I'd
like to enter into the record the zoning ordinance, case file and packet materials and the
exhibits.
Bob Howard: So accepted.
Mary Austin: This property is within the City of Wheat Ridge. All notifications and
posting requirements have been met. Therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. At
this time, I'd like to run through some slides of the property. Once we get past Wal-Mart.
Okay. This slide is looking west at the property. The property in question is on the right
hand side of the slide, on, on the right hand side of the, the hedge that you see in the
foreground. And the location of the proposed garage is an expansion of the existing
single car garage that, that you see with the white door. Uh, and the garage, uh, is
planned to be expanded, uh,to, over to the left hand side of that. This slide is also
looking west. Uh, this looks at the north side of the house showing that there is an
extensive amount of property on the north side of the house. Uh, the existing single car
garage you, you can see on, on the far, very far left hand side of the slide. And this is a
slide of the existing, uh, surrounding neighborhood showing the single family residential
neighborhood, uh, looking to the north, kinda northeast. The applicant has submitted a
site plan showing the proposed location for the attached garage expansion and you all
should have received a copy of this in your packets. The existing structure is currently
about fifteen feet from the southwest property line. The requested variance is for an
expansion of that attached garage and also to provide extra storage space for the medical
equipment. Uh, the, the applicants do receive medical deliveries that are, measure
approximately one cubic foot in size and they receive these deliveries about once a week
for their fourteen year old son. The proposed addition would encroach upon ten feet of
this required fifteen foot setback, uh, which would leave a five foot setback on that
southwest property line. Uh, the size of the lot at approximately fifteen thousand one
hundred forty eight square feet does exceed the minimum lot area requirements for the R-
one district. The property does have a lot width of a hundred and five feet which also
exceeds the minimum lot width for a single family home. The applicant submitted a
letter outlining the reasons for their requested variance and you all would have received a
copy of that in your packets. Uh, as of this time, staff has received no objection to, or
public comment at all, regarding this variance request. Ub, there is, uh, one thing that
was recently received by the office, uh, the latest letter, even dated today, at the request
of Travis Crane, our planner, and at the request also of the applicant, the Ankoviaks, uh,
they requested that our city forester come out to the site and, and take a look at the
existing trees on the site and, namely, the shrubs that you see in the slide on the
foreground and, and come up with, you know, some kind of opinion as to, you know, if
these shrubs were removed what, what would be removed and just kinda, in general, to
look at impacts. So, at this time, I would like to pass you out each a copy of these letters.
It's just additional information we've recently received that we wanted to provide to you.
At this time, I'd like to run through the variance criteria. Criteria number one: if the
request is denied, it may still yield a reasonable return. Uh, the property is currently used
as a single family residence and, of course, this use may continue on the property, uh,
2
even if this request is denied. The property does currently have an existing garage that
could be utilized for storage. Criteria number two: approval could possibly alter the
essential character of the neighborhood. Uh, all the properties in the immediate vicinity
are zoned R-one as well with a fifteen foot setback, side yard setback requirement. Uh,
the variance in this case would reduce the side yard setback from fifteen feet to five feet.
Uh, there are currently few encroachments into side yard setbacks in this neighborhood
which stem from pre-existing conditions and there has only been one side yard variance
requested and granted, uh, for this neighborhood. Criteria number three: the lot does
meet the minimum standards for size and width in an R-one district. A section of the rear
yard does drop off toward the gulch on the north side of the property. There is a small
section in the rear of the property which is located within a floodplain zone. It may be
more costly to place a structure in the rear yard, uh, but neither the floodplain nor the
topography, uh, should deem the rear yard unusable or unbuildable. Criteria number
four: the applicant has created a self-imposed hardship through their desire to increase
the size of the existing garage on the property. The required side yard setback of fifteen
feet was in existence when they purchased the home and there may be other alternatives
to accomplish the ultimate goal of the applicant which, uh, is, as is stated in their letter, is
the storing of medical deliveries. Criteria number five: if the variance were granted, the
proposed structure would be located within five feet of the property line. The runoff
from the roof could potentially adversely affect the neighboring property and the variance
could potentially impair the adequate supply of light and air to this adjacent property.
The overall building separation between the neighboring property to the south would be
reduced to roughly sixteen feet. If this variance were granted, uh, it would not increase
congestion in the streets, and it would not likely diminish property values in the
neighborhood. Criteria number six: the expansion of the attached garage would make
delivery and service of the medical equipment more convenient for the homeowner. The
current structure does have an attached garage that may be more suitable for delivery
drop-off. Uh, it would not have any beneficial effects to the surrounding properties of the
neighborhood. It would be beneficial to this property owner alone. Based on the above
criteria, staff concludes that the criteria are not supportive of a variance request in this
case and, therefore, staff did recommend denial. And, I'm, I'm open, myself and Travis
Crane, who, uh, who did the analysis, are open to any questions you have of us before the
applicant gets up.
Bob Howard: Any questions of staff? Yes, Paul.
Paul Hovland: One question, just a clarification, it is indeed a ten foot variance they're
asking for. I see on the cover sheet they, it says a twelve foot.
Mary Austin: Uh, what happened, Paul, was, it was, it was originally published wrong.
Uh, the original thinking was that the encroachment was going to be within three foot of
the property line. We're okay on the publishing requirements because what they're
actually asking for is less of an encroachment than we published for, not more. If they
were asking for more, then, then we would have a problem with the publication, but
they're not.
Paul Hovland: One other question, not related to this case, but I see, uh, I was going to
ask this earlier. We're no longer dealing with ten criteria, we're down to six, uh.
Mary Austin: Yes. With the new rewrite of Chapter 26, uh, we now have new criteria
for a variance and we're down to six instead of the original ten.
Alan White: Several have been combined and, uh, we, we know we need to get you a
new copy of Chapter 26 when we get it from the attorney.
Michelle Brown: Uh, actually, can you put it back on the slide where we could see the
north side?
Mary Austin: That one?
4
Michelle Brown: Yeah. Well, I was just curious, specifically on the trees he was looking
at. So the trees he's taWng.....yeah, it's hard to tell which ones he's actually talking
about, uh, construction getting in the way of. Okay. That's all I really have there.
Bob Howard: Paul.
Paul Drda: Uh, somewhere else, on one of the other cases, think this is a question for you
Alan, you talked about a sixteen foot combined side setback and on this one it just talks
about a sixteen foot setback. I was curious about that word "combined" whether that is
germane to this or what that refers to.
Alan White: What that refers to is the, the setbacks on both sides of the house must total
that dimension.
Paul Drda: Is that applicable here as well?
Alan White: No.
Paul Drda: No.
Travis Crane: No. The fifteen feet on each side for the side yard setback in the
residential one district.
Paul Drda: Okay. So the other one is different.
Travis Crane: Correct.
Mary Austin: Right. What you're referring to, Paul, are two separate zoning districts and
the side yard setback is written differently for each district.
Paul Drda: Thanks.
5
Tom Abbott: Let's see, Mary, it talks about in number two there, it talks about there are
currently a few encroachments into side yard setbacks in this neighborhood which you
say stem from pre-existing conditions. Could you just expand on that a little bit for
everybody?
Mary Austin: Actually I am going to refer that question to Travis since he's, he's
the one that took a look at the neighborhood.
Travis Crane: Tom, I believe there are about three or four houses in the area that have
encroachments, uh, that probably existed before the city incorporated. There has been
one variance for the area, though, about three houses to the north of the Ankoviak's
house. There was a variance asked for and granted for a side yard setback.
Tom Abbott: Do you know anything about that variance?
Travis Crane: Uh, the only thing I know about it is the applicant, and this was done back
in I want to say 1993, had to store some of his tools. I think he was a construction worker
and he wanted to store some of his tools and keep them safe inside a garage.
Tom Abbott: Okay. So we don't know any real specifics beyond that....
Travis Crane: No, sir.
Tom Abbott: ...why the Board granted...
Travis Crane: No, sir.
Tom Abbott: ...I doubt they granted it just so he could store his tools.
Travis Crane: Uh, no, I have no idea.
6
Tom Abbott: Okay, uh, related to number five, it says that, uh, it would not likely
diminish the property values within the neighborhood. But then when we come down to
staff conclusions, number six says the proposed addition could potentially impact
neighboring properties. So, what's the, what's the difference in those two statements?
One seems to say it would not likely diminish property values and the other one refers to
some kind of undescribed potential impact.
Travis Crane: Well, number six in the conclusions is referring to potentially impacting
the property specifically to the south in, in respect to drainage. I had one of our drainage
experts come out and, and look at this property and he said there could be potentially a
problem with drainage.
Tom Abbott: You're not referring to property values, then....
Travis Crane: No, sir.
Tom Abbott: you're referring to the impact that you outlined in other places...
Travis Crane: That's correct...
Tom Abbott: ...with drainage and air and light.
Travis Crane: Correct.
Tom Abbott: Thank you.
Bob Howard: Any other questions? I have one question. What is the side yard setback
on the garage immediately to the south of that. Do we have any idea how close they are
to their lot line?
7
Mary Austin: I don't have, I don't have a measurement on that, Bob. Did you take a
measurement, Travis?
Travis Crane: I never took a measurement. Uh, I could speculate that it's probably
within the fifteen foot.
Mary Austin: Well, you said here that it would reduce it to, if they were, granted it, to
roughly sixteen feet between the....
Travis Crane: Between, the two, right. Correct.
Mary Austin: between the structures, so that is twenty-one feet. Which, which would
mean that probably the existing structure is about eleven feet within that property line
with the additional five feet with Travis' estimate, they would be...they would result in
being about sixteen feet apart.
Bob Howard: Any other questions of staff? All right, we will now hear from the
applicant.
My name is Stan Ankoviak. I'm the husband of the applicant, Shayne. And my address
is 12141 West 32nd Drive.
Bob Howard: Do you swear to tell the truth as you know it in this case?
Stan Ankoviak: Yes.
Bob Howard: Proceed.
Stan Ankoviak: Okay. I've resided in the City of Wheat Ridge for seventeen years and
at this address for approximately four years. We have two children attending Wheat
Ridge schools and one of them is the children, or the child in question on this, uh, letter
8
we had wrote for the reason of the storage of medical equipment. A couple of
inconsistencies that we saw in this, uh, the variance criteria that I've noted, and I have
some letters I'd like to give out to you, also. If I can do that first. Uh, the variance
criteria number one, uh, the city's position, uh, the property currently has an existing
garage that could be util... utilized for storage. Excuse me. Yes, it has a single car
garage. We park our car in there. It is a one-car garage. The only house within a several
block area with a single car garage. And our car, we need to have one car in the garage.
We prefer to have one car in the garage so we have one that we know is going to run all
the time. Uh, as far as criteria number two, approval of this request could possibly alter
the essential character of the neighborhood. Yes, it would alter the essential character of
the neighborhood. I would think it would improve it as by the letter that you see. There
are a couple of letters from the neighbors both to the west and the east and all eleven
houses on our street have signed that letter there. Uh, you know, that's, that is just our
street. We didn't go behind us or anything. We figured the people on our street were the
pertinent ones that were concerned with this here. And nobody was opposed to it and we
had two letters written on our behalf. Let's see here. The row of trees on the southwest
side of the property would have to be removed. We call them shrubs. They're trimmed
as hedges. That's, uh, Mr. Cassell's letter. It states there: the trees on the north side of
the house or, excuse me, the east side of the house. I have a picture of those here. You
had said you couldn't see a very good picture of `em. There are large trees planted when
the house was...the house was built there approximately the house is thirty-two years
old. Oh, excuse me, I'm sorry. Uh, so they were planted then. They would both have to
be removed if we were to build on the, uh, east side of our property. And I know, uh, uh,
Mr. Cassells, when he came out and looked at the property agreed that saving those plus
there's a juniper tree behind them was a lot, uh, more important than saving some, uh, the
hedges. And the hedges wouldn't be totally removed anyway. They'd be removed up to
where the garage would be extended out is all. Uh, the encroachments, other
encroachments in the neighborhood, yes, two of the three that I measured ...I only
measured three of `em... one across the street, he's at thirteen foot ...that's 12151. 12080
which is a couple houses down across the street, he's at eight foot. Those houses were
built, you know, that way and then I imagine the city (inaudible) later. The one variance
9
that was proposed and the board approved it, uh, approximately six or seven years ago.
Travis said it was, uh, ninety-three. It may have been. Uh, 12081, they have a four and a
half foot setback. Their house is built exactly the same as our house and our proposed
addition would be exactly the same as their proposed addition. Ours would go to ten feet.
And their variance was granted strictly for storing tools. That's what we were told.
Again, I don't have the records of it. I was not...I didn't look it up. But, talking to the
neighbors, all they did was went in and said we're gonna either to park our truck outside
with our tools in, but we want to park it inside. They had a single car garage already.
They allowed to them to buy another, or build on, put a second garage car on there and it
was for the purpose of storing tools. Uh, uh, number three: it may be more costly to
place a structure in the rear of the yard, however, neither the floodplain nor the
topography do deem the rear yard unusable or unbuildable. Building on the east side or
the back would definitely alter the character of the neighborhood. Two of the people in
the neighborhood, the neighbors to the east and the neighbors across the street, both
voiced some concern if we weren't allowed to build on the west side and tried to build a
detached structure on the east side or in the back it would definitely alter the character of
the neighborhood in a detrimental sort of way. Number 4: yes, we have sole interest in
the property. There may be other alternatives but basically the same thing we talked
about in three... building on the east versus the west side. An attached garage would look
very nice. It would, again, look like the rest of the neighborhood... everybody with two-
car garages. When we purchased the house, yes, the variance was in place. Yes, we are
fifteen foot away. The previous owners had told us, well, Mike and Becky had added on
only a few years prior. You know, we were thinking about adding on, too, you know, so,
we went in with, thinking we were gonna be able to do that. Again, that was probably a
little bit of foresight, or, we shouldn't have probably done that... checked into it a little
closer. But that variance had only been granted three years, four years prior to us moving
in there four years ago. Uh, number five, as I said, the neighbors to the east have no
problem with the addition as stated in their letter and the neighbors to the west. They all
believe it's a benefit to the neighborhood for us, for our house to pretty much match the
rest of the houses. Uh, number six, yes it'd be a costly convenience for us....it would be
a convenience, but on the other hand, we do need the room to store. It was stated that we
10
have one cubic foot of medical supplies delivered once a week. That one cubic foot of
supplies costs anywhere between three and four thousand dollars. Uh, once a month, we
also get larger shipments, you know, machines and stuff. Again, nothing real, real big,
but the stuff comes in three or four or five boxes sometimes. We get a large delivery
once a month. Uh, that's all I have. I did have another picture of the, the neighbors
house and the variance, or what their house ended up looking like. It's not a (inaudible).
And that house is two houses to the east of us, is all, so. I have nothing further. Anybody
have any questions?
Bob Howard: Any questions of the applicant. Bill?
Bill Echelmeyer: Besides the one cubic foot box, one cubic foot box, what other medical
equipment is involved and what size?
Stan Ankoviak: My son has, uh, short gut syndrome and he has to get a TPN drip, uh,
two or three nights a week. That, uh, comes on a weekly basis. The monthly basis we
get boxes of, uh, he is also hooked up daily to a, uh, uh, stomach pump we'll say it. It's
another, uh, machine, uh, that pumps in just a formula. That's a nightly thing. We go
through a box of formula a month, approximately. The formula, I'm not sure the cost of
it exactly, but.... so we get, we get three, four or five boxes a month. You know, one a
week and then once a month, uh, probably a stack of boxes yay high or something, you
know. We'd like to be able to have a place to put this stuff.
Bill Echelmeyer: You mentioned machines that you also get. (inaudible) on site?
Stan Ankoviak: Uh, they trade out the machines. Yeah, we keep the machines on site
but we trade them out...
Bill Echelmeyer: They're in your house now?
Stan Ankoviak: about every two months. Yes. Yes.
11
Bill Echelmeyer: So they stay there?
Stan Ankoviak: Yes. And we trade `em out every two months.
Bill Echelmeyer: (inaudible) and hold what?
Stan Ankoviak: Excuse me?
Bill Echelmeyer: The boxes that come in hold what ...bottled liquid or....
Stan Ankoviak: Some refrigerated IV drip solution, some formula, uh, medicine bags,
you know, the stuff you see hanging on an IV pole, stuff like that there. Syringes,
needles ...I mean we get boxes of needles that, you know, `cause we have to access his
port, draw blood, stuff like that there, so, several things like that also.
Bill Echelmeyer: What are you doing with those things now? Do they go in the garage?
Stan Ankoviak: Uh, no. Typically, they'll set `em on the front porch or we try and be
there when they deliver `em.
Bill Echelmeyer: How many times do they wind up on the front porch?
Stan Ankoviak: Uh, probably half the time, fifty percent of the time at least.
Bill Echelmeyer: And you're paying thousands of dollars for these?
Stan Ankoviak: Yes.
Bill Echelmeyer: Leaving them on your front porch?
12
Stan Ankoviak: Yes.
Bill Echelmeyer: Well, what's your priority? Placing an automobile next to your present
garage or the medical supplies? Which comes first in your judgment?
Stan Ankoviak: Well, our medical supplies comes first. If, if you're asking me do you
want me to pull my car out of the garage and put, uh, put my medical supplies in the
garage, or have a place to put my medical supplies when they're delivered.
Bill Echelmeyer: Okay.
Bob Howard: Any other questions of the applicant? Yes, Jerry.
Jerry Montoya: Uh, you just passed around three pictures here. I couldn't understand
(inaudible) like a double car garage.
Stan Ankoviak: Oh, that is the neighbor that had the variance.
Jerry Montoya: The one that had the variance?
Stan Ankoviak: The variance. That's what he built. That variance was approved, uh,
approximately seven years ago for the purpose of storing tools.
Bob Howard: Yeah, Tom.
Tom Abbott: Well, I guess I'm just struggling with some of the philosophy. Uh, you
know, one of the criteria is to help a person with disabilities. Uh, but the problem with
that one is that these variances run with the land. So, in the case, where we've granted
somebody a shed to store a, a bike, you know, for exercising and so forth, like that or
ramps. But those things can be removed when somebody sells the house. But when you
talk about building a permanent garage and you move next year, and that accommodation
13
for the disability remains in the neighborhood forever. I guess when I read the packet I
got the understanding that this was the purpose of this structure, was to accommodate the
disability. But when I hear you begin your, uh, discussion of the variance, you focused
much more on the need for the garage and how.... and when I read your neighbors
letters... it's the... you're the only house that doesn't have a double car garage and, so it's
not coming from the disability argument. It's really raising a whole other argument. It
says, well I want a garage and one of the avenues to justify the variance is I'll use this
disability argument.
Stan Ankoviak: I'm not gonna argue with you. We want a garage. And we feel that we
have a need for that garage. You know, will it be used for some other things? Well, of
course, it will be.
Tom Abbott: I, I appreciate that. I think it cleans it up in my mind... to say...
Stan Ankoviak Okay.
Tom Abbott: ...I want a garage, and it's serving more then one purpose. It's, it's, uh,
performing the normal functions of a garage and oh, by the way, it helps us accommodate
this disability so that, in my mind, I guess I'm saying if I was to vote for this one, I'd be
voting for the garage and not the disability since it seems the amount of equipment
you've got doesn't need a whole garage. You could have asked for a shed along the side,
or something, to accommodate that amount of material. So, I appreciate you stating you
want a garage. Okay, thank you.
Bob Howard: Any other questions? I have one question. Uh, you haven't made any
provisions for, for these medical deliveries with your existing garage. Now what kind,
what kind of provisions would you make on the, on the addition to a garage if it's the
same medical equipment?
14
Stan Ankoviak: Uh, Children's Hospital sent us a letter a few weeks ago...to give you a
little history. They're going to be changing providers. They're not going to be providing
some of our service. It's gonna to go to a contract basis. So we're thinking a separate car
garage ...we'd give them a garage door opener... they could at least get in the garage and
set the stuff in the garage. My wife is starting to work more now so we're not home as
much to accept the supplies and stuff. And so we're going to give them a garage door
opener for one side to get in.
Bob Howard: Could you offer those same conditions for your existing garage, so that
they could get into your existing garage?
Stan Ankoviak: I suppose we could.
Bob Howard: Thank you. Another question?
Tom Abbott: Let me ask you another question. You know, staff in here raises a
legitimate issue that does happen when you put buildings in close proximity where roof
runoff starts to create drainage problems. It doesn't have (inaudible) to run into. It's
only got five feet. And, you know the lay of the land between you and your neighbor.
What's the....
Stan Ankoviak: He has a garage there. No basement underneath the garage. It's
only-it's just a garage. Uh, his yard on that side slopes back to the creek, Lena Gulch
there, pretty dramatically. That is probably the crest right there. I would think the
water... part of it will run this way, part of it will run into Lena Gulch.
Tom Abbott: So, you're saying you don't feel it would run over into his yard.
Stan Ankoviak: No, I don't feel that. No. If you took a look at it, if you were there, you
would see his house. There's, there's a little low swell right there.
15
Tom Abbott: Okay
Bob Howard: Yes, Jerry
Jerry Montoya: Along the same lines. Traditionally, more sites (inaudible) the houses
were built (inaudible) with ice and snow in the winter. (inaudible) I mean (inaudible) you
can get this buildup. You've got that existing condition. How far do you see that
encroaching into the neighbor and, I noticed in some of the previous cases, there have
been gardens and stuff in there, but since it is a garage with a driveway, that has a little
bearing on my decision. Uh, you know, are you shoveling your snow and ice into the
neighbor's driveway, is what I'm saying basically.
Stan Ankoviak: Well, we don't do it now. Our driveways are pretty close together now
The garage over there....
Jerry Montoya: Do you know what the existing.....
Stan Ankoviak: Yeah no, no I don't think, I don't think it would affect it all. I don't
think that would ...I mean, it may not, may not melt right along the house which it doesn't
do, but it hits ...the sun hits his, it'd be his east side of the garage and it still would by
moving that over. It's not like, uh, there would be that much...
Bob Howard: Yes, Tom.
Tom Abbott: Have you done any design work on this garage? (inaudible)
Stan Ankoviak: Very, very premature. I mean, very excuse me, we had contractors
out...looked at it, but the first thing they all said was come get your variance before you
spend any money with us.
16
Tom Abbott: What I'm eluding to here is that when we've granted these sort of things in
the past, quite often we've stipulated that the addition has to match the house. If the
house is brick, the addition is brick
Stan Ankoviak: Our intention is to do just as the Osborne's have done two houses
down... get brick that is as close to the match as we can. The brick we have, the blonde
brick, he says he can pretty much match ...the one contractor which we would probably
go with and it would be bricked all the way around. The only thing then would be
siding... it's just the, uh... over the garage.
Tom Abbott: Your neighbors, although they express good will now, you put up a Hugh
M. Woods cheap garage, they....
Stan Ankoviak: No. They've... we've... yeah, they, they know we're doing. We've just
sketched it out sorta. They've seen what the neighbors have and that's basically the
design we'd like to try and go with. Because, yes, we want something that looks real
nice, too. We have no intention of moving out of the neighborhood.
Tom Abbott: Thank you.
Bob Howard: Yes, Jerry.
Jerry Montoya: Uh, one last question. Did staff tell you that we have the authority to
grant the variance with stipulations?
Stan Ankoviak: Uh.....
Jerry Montoya: Are you aware of that?
Stan Ankoviak: They may have told us that. I... off the top of my head, I do not
remember that conversation, but, it may have come up.
17
Jerry Montoya: I have no further questions.
Bob Howard: Anything else?
Alan White: For the record, there's no one signed up, uh, to speak on this item, except
the applicant
Michelle Brown: Can we just discuss amongst ourselves briefly. Can we just discuss
amongst ourselves briefly. I think we definitely should include a stipulation, or
condition, that it has to, you know match the brick, or has to be a brick structure or
something. I mean, personally.....
Paul Hovland: Yeah, I was gonna ask the same question but Tom, you asked first, about
the design of it. Since we frequently see a design, and have no design plan on this here...
(unidentified): .....make a motion?
Bob Howard: Motion is in order.
(inaudible)
Tom Abbott: What you can do is, after the motion is made, then it is really... then you
can come back, I think, with ideas like that and add `em on, and if the maker of the
motion accepts it, then it just slides right in without a lot of discussion prior to the
motion.
Bob Howard: Alan.
Alan White: Yes.
18
Paul Drda: Alan, so would drainage issues be covered by any building permits that
would be associated with the construction?
Alan White: Yes, that's something that we can look at with building permit review.
Paul Drda: (inaudible).... be a special case.
Alan White: It's, uh, generally not on garage conditions. So, if it's a concern to the
Board, it's, it's something you should bring up in your, your motion. Could I ask
everyone to.... we have a different camera and sound system and we're having a hard
time hearing you out here. If you could be real conscientious about talking into the
microphones, we'd appreciate it. Thank you.
Michelle Brown: Ready for a motion?
Bob Howard: Yes.
Michelle Brown: Sorry. Okay. In case number WA-01-01, applicant's name being
Shayne Ankoviak. The location, 12141 West 32nd Drive, Wheat Ridge. Uh, Whereas,
the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and whereas, Board of
Adjust, Adjustment Application Case Number WA-01-01 is an appeal to this Board from
the decision of an administrative officer; and whereas, the property has been posted the
fifteen days required by law; there were no protests registered against it; and whereas,
the relief applied for may be granted without detriment to the public welfare and without
substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing the City of
Wheat Ridge, now, therefore, be it resolved.... oh, that's yours ...I'm sorry ...that Board of
Adjustment Application Case No. WA-01-01 be approved for a request for a ten-foot side
yard setback variance from the fifteen foot side yard setback variance requirement in R-
one, R-one zone, reducing the five foot, uh, the setback to five feet for the purpose of
expanding an attached garage for the following reasons. The proposed addition would
be more in line with the existing character of the neighborhood. And second, uh, the
19
proposed addition would be located on the west side of the property, whereas on the east
side, the city forester indicated that there would be a problem removing four mature trees.
Bob Howard: Do we have a second to that motion?
Tom Abbott: Second. And I'd like to offer, uh, friendly amendments for your review.
Uh, number one, uh, the Board recognizes that there are other properties in the immediate
neighborhood which encroach to varying degrees into the required fifteen foot setback.
Number... another second one...Uh, letters/petitions of support for the desirability of the
additional garage and for support of the ten foot encroachment have been submitted by
eleven immediately adjacent neighbors. Also expressed by these neighbors was the
opinion that the addition would, quote, enhance the value of our homes, unquote. And a
third one.... the variance would, although not primarily to purpose, provide
accommodation for a disability as described in the application. There are three of them
there.
Bob Howard: That's agreeable?
Michelle Brown: That's agreeable. I'm agreeable to that.
Bob Howard: Any discussion on the motion?
Paul Drda (may have been Paul Hovland): Now, what about design restrictions or
drainage issues?
Tom Abbott: I think we should put some in. I think we all agreed to that. (inaudible) I
guess, I was...I just did my brief little (inaudible).
Michelle Brown: Uh, with the following condition, then, that, uh, the property, or the
addition, uh, sorry, writing it here... be constructed in such a manner...
20
Tom Abbott: Call it design compatibility... something like that... in
materials... compatible design and materials to existing structure.
Jerry Montoya: Could I add one thing... with special attention to drainage... to alleviate
any unnecessary drainage to the neighbor.
Paul Hovland: Or do you want to leave that up to the building inspector? Uh, I mean,
express our concern for the drainage issue... based on the approval of the building
inspector or something to that effect.
Tom Abbott: Yeah. I think they'd have to do some kind of a survey to see which way
water runs downhill there.
Michelle Brown: (inaudible)
Paul Hovland: Building inspector's the one (inaudible).
Michelle Brown: ...inspector (inaudible)
Paul Hovland: Address the drainage issue.
Michelle Brown: Okay. With the following condition. The addition design must be
compatible materials to the, uh, to the current existing structure of the house. Also, uh,
we have a request that the building inspector address the drainage issue, uh, when he or
she issues the permit.
Paul Drda: Would it be possible to, uh, instead of compatible, say something to the effect
it's, uh, as much as possible, matches it aesthetically? Compatibility can mean a lot of
different things.
Michelle Brown: Aesthetically compatible?
21
Paul Drda: Sure.
Tom Abbott: (inaudible) we kinda have to leave it up to staff to make that judgment
because aesthetics can be interpreted all over the place, too
Michelle Brown: Right, that's really...
Tom Abbott: I had, I had one question here that keeps on my mind, and that's this air
and light thing and I wonder if the neighbor immediately to the southwest, where this
structure's going, really understands the effect this building's gonna have on the shade
laying over onto their, onto their yard. Uh, this would be unusual, but I just think it's
something that's been left out. I would think, although that neighbor's mentioned in
here, they don't specifically mention that they understand the effect the building will
have on the shade over in their yard. I wonder if we can't include that as a condition that
the city has to receive a letter from that neighbor saying that they understand the shade
impact on their yard. It doesn't change our motion from a yes or no, but it means if this
neighbor all of a sudden says, now that I think about it, and this shade is gonna to
come it's gonna to cause me a ,problem. Uh, will, the city will have a letter on record if
he comes back next year after this building is built and says, my god, look what's
happened to my yard, the city can say, you wrote a letter saying you understood. You
know, in a very specific way rather than in a, very general terms that this, that these
letters we have... would it be unusual. I don't remember asking for something like that
before, but it just concerns me that... it's one thing to think you know what it's gonna
look like next door and it's another thing when, all of a sudden, that twelve foot wall
starts coming up right next door.
Michelle Brown: Okay. With an additional condition that the adjacent neighbor provides
a letter...
Tom Abbott: To the city...
22
Michelle Brown: To the city.
Tom Abbott: stating they understand and accept the impacts of shade on their, uh,
property caused by this structure.
Michelle Brown: Okay, that the adjacent neighbor provides a letter to the city, uh,
showing their understanding of the shade... impact of shade should, uh, should the
addition be built.
Tom Abbott: Right.
Paul Hovland: I don't really think that's much of an issue. Uh, the houses.... they're
oriented basically to the south. If anything, the house next door, the one that you're
concerned about, is casting more of a shadow the other direction I mean, granted, in
the, in the morning, there will... there'll be some shade in there.
Tom Abbott: (inaudible) I don't what time of day or what date this was taken. It was
probably just not too long ago....
Paul Hovland: A couple of days ago or something... it would have to be.
Tom Abbott: and there's relatively low sun still, but it's not dead of winter...
Paul Hovland: No.
Tom Abbott: and, uh, it's shady now, right now, three or four feet in this picture.
Paul Hovland: Mm-mmm.
Tom Abbott: So I don't know what the worst case scenario is. You know, the longest
23
day of the year scenario. Uh, I just, I just guess I would feel better if I knew this
neighbor was on record with the city. Also, as you know, we try to make these variances
unique. We, we... we're really not considering whether this guy got tool storage or not.
There's probably more to that story. And, so, I don't know ...I always kinda argue that
you put more of these things in there then another neighbor can't come back and say, for
no particular reason, you granted this variance. The more things that the person asking
for the variance had to accomplish, I think the more unique, then, it makes that variance
and the harder it is for somebody to come back and just make the flat statement that you
set a precedent. You gave it away down the street, now I want it. So, that, to me, it's
another way. You say, well if you can get a letter from your neighbor....
Paul Hovland: That, that neighbor already has given a letter. But it's short and it doesn't
address the shade issue, but....
Tom Abbott: So, I'll be willing to pull my hand on it if the maker of the motion doesn't
care, but I'm just throwing it out there.
Bill Echelmeyer: I, I'm going to vote against it. And the reason is for seven years we
have held a hardship must be evidence before we make this kind of a variance. And what
happened ten years ago to a piece of property down the end of the street and what the
gossip in the community says... he only built the thing for tools and that's the only.... and
we have to see the bottom of that case. But, it's really not applicable. We have stuck
very religiously for the past, at least seven years I've been on this board, in the fact that if
we go for a variance we do it because there's a valid hardship. And, in essence, in the
beginning it might have appeared that was so with the mention of medical equipment.
When you get right down to it, he wants to expand his garage. Every time we do this in a
neighborhood and wipe out a reasonable side yard and back yard and front yard
difference between properties, we hurt the community and we hurt the people whose
houses are there. (inaudible) his neighbors who, as you say, don't really see maybe the
impact that this may have over a period of time. The fifteen feet came about because of a
valid (inaudible) safety and drainage and it's been there for years and it's been tried for
24
years and we really haven't stepped aside from sticking to the fact that a hardship must be
there for this to be a valid variance. And, I'm gonna vote against it.
Bob Howard: Okay. Prior to the vote, for the record, there are seven members present
and for the variance to be granted, takes an affirmative vote... affirmative... six
affirmative votes. So, with that.....
Alan White: Could I ask for clarification before you vote. Was there a third condition,
uh, agreed upon or attached to the motion?
Michelle Brown: Yeah. We had three if we go with the shade issue which I think.....
Tom Abbott: Yeah. It's just made as a friendly amendment if you accept it or not.
Michelle Brown: I accept it. I have... yes. So there would be three conditions. One that
the design be compatible to the existing structure. One that the building inspector
address the drainage issue when issuing the permit. And, third, that the adjacent property
owner provide a letter to the city indicating their understanding of, the, uh, potential
impact of shade. I don't think anybody second (inaudible).
Jerry Montoya: Just one last comment. I do want to recognize that there's a medical
hardship here in this and it's been written into this motion, I think, that we recognize
there is a medical hardship.
Michelle Brown: I, I'm........
Jerry Montoya: In the motion, as stands, that it is there.
Michelle Brown: Actually, I'm not comfortable putting that there's a medical hardship
just because currently they're not storing them in the garage. Currently, they're keeping
them on the front porch. I understand that they do have a medical hardship in, in their
25
home. They, they have to save a child. However, I.....
Jerry Montoya: That was stated in this...
Tom Abbott: Do you want me to read that again, Michelle, what my words were there?
It says....
Michelle Brown: I'm sorry.
Tom Abbott: ....it said this variance would, although not primarily to purpose, provide
accommodation for a disability as described in the application. So, I... so that's the way I
worded it. If you're not comfortable with that, then I wouldn't accept the (inaudible)
amendment if I was you.
Michelle Brown: Read it again. How did you word it?
Tom Abbott: This variance would, although not primary to purpose....
Michelle Brown: Primarily to purpose?
Tom Abbott: Primary, primary in other words, he testified that, uh, the real purpose, he
wanted a garage.
Michelle Brown: Right. And that's what I'm trying to get here out of the motion.
Tom Abbott: So I say, although not primary to purpose...
Michelle Brown: Okay.
Tom Abbott: ...uh, will provide accommodation for a disability as described in the
application. It will provide for him to store this material....
26
Michelle Brown: Well, I think that I guess how I hear you saying it is, is we're not
necessarily granting it because it's a medical hardship...
Tom Abbott: I think that's what...
Michelle Brown: and I guess that's what I'm saying, Jerry ....I'm not comfortable
with saying we're granting it because of a medical hardship. I like the way he worded it.
Jerry Montoya: If that's not in, in the application, that affects my vote. That's what I'm
saying. Is it there or not? If it's not....
Michelle Brown: It's there. The only way I'm comfortable is, is how Tom worded it,
personally. If anyone else wants to come up with a......
Tom Abbott: It's there. It says it's not primary to purpose.
Michelle Brown: It's definitely not...
Tom Abbott: It says basically we didn't grant it because (inaudible)\
Jerry Montoya: (inaudible)
Bob Howard: I think we've had enough discussion on this. Let's please vote.
Ann Lazzeri: The motion then fails because we need six affirmative votes and Howard
and Echelmeyer voted opposed.
Bob Howard: Request for variance has been denied.
27
7500 West 29th Avenue The City of
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215 Wheat
Telephone 303/235-2846 Rid'g'e
FAX 303/235-2857
May 3, 2001
Shayne Ankoviak
12141 W. 32"d Dr.
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Dear Mr. Ankoviak:
RE: Case No. WA-01-01
Please be advised that at its meeting on April 26, 2001, the Board of Adjustment DENIED your
request for approval of a 10 foot side yard setback variance from the required 15 foot side yard
setback resulting in a proposed 5 foot side yard setback for the purpose of constructing an attached
garage addition for property zoned Residential-One (R-1) and located at 12141 W. 32"d Dr.
Attached is a copy of the Certificate of Resolution stating the Board's decision which became
effective the date of the meeting. Should you decide to appeal the decision of the Board, you will
need to notify the Jefferson County district court in writing within 30 days of the Board's decision.
Please feel free to contact meat (303) 235-2846 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Kathy Fiel
Planning Secretary
Enclosures: Certificate of Resolution
Draft of Minutes
cc: WA-01-01 (case file)
C:\Kathy\B OA\CORRESP\wa0I0 i denial, wpd
CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTION
I, Ann Lazzeri, Secretary to the City of Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment, do hereby certify that the following
Resolution was duly adopted in the City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado on the 26th day of
April, 2001.
CASE NO: WA-01-01
APPLICANT'S NAME: Shayne Ankoviak
LOCATION: 12141 West 32nd Drive
Upon a motion by Board Member BROWN and second by Board Member ABBOTT, the following resolution was
stated:
WHEREAS, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and
WHEREAS, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-01-01 is an appeal to this Board from the decision of
an administrative officer; and
WHEREAS, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law, and in recognition that there were no
protests registered against it; and
WHEREAS, the relief applied for may be granted without detriment to the public welfare and without substantially
impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-01-01 be, and
hereby is, APPROVED.
TYPE OF VARIANCE: A 10-foot side yard setback variance from the required 15-foot side yard setback
resulting in a proposed 5-foot side yard setback for the purpose of constructing a garage addition.
FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
1. The addition would be more in line with the existing character of the neighborhood.
2. The proposed addition would be located on the west side of the property whereas on the east side, the
city forester indicated there would be a problem in removing four mature trees.
3. The Board recognizes that there are other properties in the immediate neighborhood which encroach to
varying degrees into the required 15-foot setback.
4. Letters/petitions of support of the 10-foot encroachment have been submitted by eleven immediately
adjacent neighbors. Also expressed by these neighbors was the opinion that the addition would
"enhance the value of our homes."
5. The variance would, although not primary to purpose, provide accommodation for a disability as
described in the application.
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. The addition must be compatible in design and building materials to the current existing structure of the
house.
2. The building inspectors will address the drainage issue before the building permit is issued.
3. The adjacent neighbor will provide a letter to the city stating that he understands and accepts the impact of
shade on his property from the proposed structure before a building permit is issued.
Board of Adjustment
Resolution WA-01-01
Page two (2)
VOTE: YES: ABBOTT, BROWN, DRDA, MONTOYA, HOVLAND
NO: ECHELMEYER, HOWARD
ABSENT: YOUNG
DISPOSITION: A request for a 10-foot side yard setback variance from the required 15-foot was DENIED,
based on Chapter 2, Article 3, Section 2-53(d) of the City of Wheat Ridge Codes of Law which state that Board of
Adjustment motions not carried are thereby deemed denied.
ADOPTED and made effective this 26th day of APRIL. 2001.
15 04 raw (/1t~vx z~
BOB HOWARD, Chairman Ann Lazzeri, Secretary
Board of Adjustment Board of Adjustment
DRAFT
4. PUBLIC HEARING
A. Case No. WA-01-01 - An application filed by Shayne Ankoviak for approval of a
10-foot side yard setback variance from the required 15-foot side yard setback
resulting in a proposed 5-foot side yard setback for the purpose of constructing a
garage addition for property zoned Residential-One (R-1) and located at 12141
West 32nd Drive.
The case was presented by Mary Austin. She reviewed the staff report, presented slides
and overheads of the subject property, and reviewed variance request evaluation criteria.
All pertinent documents were entered into the record and accepted by Chair HOWARD.
She advised the Board that there was jurisdiction to hear the case. She distributed copies
of two letters from Bill Cassel, City Forester, dated April 24 & 26, 2001 regarding
identification of plant material on the subject property. This letter was made a part of the
case file. Staff recommended denial of the application for reasons outlined in the staff
report.
In response to a question from Board Member ABBOTT, Travis Crane explained that
three or four houses in the neighborhood have encroachments of side yard setbacks which
were in existence before the city's incorporation and that there is one house located three
houses north of the applicant which received a variance for a side yard setback in 1993.
Board Member ABBOTT asked for clarification regarding potential problems for
neighbors if the variance were granted. Travis Crane explained that staff did not believe
property values would be impacted; however, there could be potential drainage problems
to a neighbor caused by run-off from the roof of the proposed structure.
Stan Ankoviak
12141 West 32nd Drive
Mr. Ankoviak, husband of Shayne (the applicant) was sworn in by Chair HOWARD.
He distributed copies of letters to the Board from neighbors who were in favor of the
application. He stated that their house is the only one in the neighborhood with only a
single car garage. He believed that approval of the application would improve the
neighborhood. The other variance granted for 12081 West 32' Avenue was a 4.5 foot
setback for the purpose of building a two-car garage. His understanding was that this
variance was granted in order for the applicant to store tools in the garage. He stated that,
even though a garage could be constructed in the rear yard, neighbors to the east and to
the rear indicated they would have an objection to construction in that location.
Neighbors to east and west believe the garage addition would improve the neighborhood
because the house would then match the rest of the houses in the neighborhood. He
would like to utilize the garage to store medical supplies for his son which are delivered
weekly.
Board of Adjustment Page 2
04/26/01
Board Member ABBOTT expressed concern that variances run with the property. He
asked the applicant for clarification about the purpose of the garage. The applicant stated
that he wants a garage for his car as well as for storage of the medical deliveries.
In response to a question from Chair HOWARD, Mr. Ankoviak stated that the present
garage could be used for medical deliveries.
Board Member ABBOTT questioned the roof run-off drainage situation. Mr. Ankoviak
explained that there is a low swale between the houses which would cause most of the
water to run off into Lena Gulch.
Board Member MONTOYA expressed concern about ice encroaching into the neighbor's
driveway caused by shade of the proposed structure. Mr. Ankoviak replied that there
would be no difference in the amount of ice on the neighbor's driveway.
In response to questioning from Board Member ABBOTT, Mr. Ankoviak replied that he
plans to build the garage from materials that would match the house.
There were no other individuals present who wished to address the Board.
Upon a motion by Board Member BROWN and second by Board Member
ABBOTT, the following resolution was stated:
Whereas, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and
Whereas, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-01-01 is an appeal to this
Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and
Whereas, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law; and in
recognition that there were no protests registered against it; and
Whereas, the relief applied for may be granted without substantially impairing the intent
and purpose of the regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge.
Now, therefore, be it resolved that Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-01-01
be, and hereby is, approved.
Type of Variance: Ten-foot side yard setback variance from the required 15-foot
side yard setback resulting in a proposed 5-foot side yard setback for the purpose of
constructing a garage addition.
Board of Adjustment Page 3
04/26/01
For the following reasons:
1. The addition would be more in line with the existing character of the
neighborhood.
2. The proposed addition would be located on the west side of the property,
whereas on the east side the city forester indicated there would be a problem
in removing four mature trees.
With the following conditions:
1. The addition must be compatible in design and building materials to the
current existing structure of the house.
2. The building inspectors will address the drainage issue before the building
permit is issued.
Board Member ABBOTT offered the following friendly amendments:
Add the following reasons:
The Board recognizes that there are other properties in the immediate
neighborhood which encroach to varying degrees into the required 15-foot setback.
Letters/petitions of support for the desirability of the additional garage and for
support of the 10-foot encroachment have been submitted by eleven immediately
adjacent neighbors. Also expressed by these neighbors was the opinion that the
addition would "enhance the value of our homes."
The variance would, although not primary to purpose, provide accommodation for
a disability as described in the application.
The amendments were accepted by Board Member BROWN.
Board Member ABBOTT offered another friendly amendment as follows:
Add a condition that the adjacent neighbor provide a letter to the city stating that
he understands and accepts the impact of shade on his property from the proposed
structure before a building permit is issued.
The amendment was accepted by Board Member BROWN.
Board Member ECHELMEYER stated he would vote against the application because he
did not believe there is evidence of a valid hardship in this case.
Board of Adjustment Page 4
04/26/01
Board Member MONTOYA wanted the record to reflect that he recognizes a medical
hardship in this case.
Chair HOWARD advised the applicant that approval of the request would require six
affirmative votes.
The motion failed by a vote of 5-2 with Board Members ECHELMEYER and
HOWARD voting no.
Chair HOWARD advised the applicant that the request for a variance had been denied.
B. Case No. TUP-01-01 - An application filed by Wal-Mart for a 30-day temporary
use permit for the purpose of conducting an outdoor garden sale at the property
located at 3600 Youngfield Street and zoned Planned Commercial Development
(PCD).
Since no representative for Wal-Mart had appeared by 8:45 p.m., it was moved by
Board Member BROWN and seconded by Board Member ECHELMEYER that
Case No. TUP-01-01 be postponed until the May Board of Adjustment meeting.
The motion passed 6-1 with Board Member HOVLAND voting no.
In response to a question from an individual in the audience, Alan White advised that the
sign posted on the property would be changed to reflect the new hearing date; however,
because it has been postponed to a date certain, it would not be necessary to send out new
letters of notification.
C. Case No. WA-01-04: - An application filed by Tom and Debra Stano for approval
of a 22-foot front yard setback variance from the required 30-foot front yard
setback requirement resulting in a proposed 8-foot front yard setback and a 1-foot
side yard setback variance from the required 15-foot combined side yard setback
resulting in a proposed 14-foot combined side yard setback for the purpose of
constructing a detached garage for property located at 6295 West 42"d Avenue and
zoned Residential-Two.
The case was presented by Mary Austin. She reviewed the staff report, presented slides
and overheads of the subject property, and reviewed variance request evaluation criteria.
All pertinent documents were entered into the record and accepted by Chair HOWARD.
She advised the Board that there was jurisdiction to hear the case. Staff recommended
denial of the application for reasons outlined in the staff report.
Tom Stano
6295 West 42"d Avenue
Mr. Stano, the applicant, was sworn in by Chair HOWARD. He stated one of the reasons
for his desire to build a garage, is to get his vehicles off the street. Because he lives on a
Board of Adjustment Page 5
04/26/01
7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80215
April 26, 2001
Ms. Shayne Ankoviak
12141 W. 32"d Ave.
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Dear Ms. Ankoviak,
The City of ~OF WHEgT~
i~
Wheat
m
GRidge
c0( O R ADO
This letter is a response to request to identify the plant material along your west
property line next to your existing driveway. Specifically, you want to know if the plants
are categorized as a tree or a shrub.
The plant(s) in question, are a Amur Maple (Acer ginnala), also called a Ginnala
Maple. This particular plant is known as a shrub or small tree, depending on how it is sold
and/or maintained. The shrub form of this plant is grown is a traditional multiple stemmed
plant, with branches and foliage from ground to the top of the plant. It is grown as a
"bush" or multiple plants are sheared into a "hedge".
The tree form of this plant is either a single stem or a multiple stem (two or three)
and grown into a tree form, usually twenty to twenty-five feet tall, with stems and foliage
in the top two-thirds of the plant.
To answer your question concerning the type of plants on your property, they are
maintained as a hedge, and would be classified and appraised in that manner. Should you
have any further questions feel free to contact my office.
Sincere)
M B ill l Cassel,
City Forester
cc: Travis Crane, Planner
(303) 234-5900 • ADMINISTRATION FAX: 234-5924 POLICE DEPARTMENT FAX: 235-2949
MEMORANDUM
TO: Travis Crane, Planner
FROM: Bill Cassel, City Forester
DATE: April 24, 2001
SUBJECT: Proposed garage at 12141 W. 32"e Dr.
Per your request, and that of the property owner, I visited the above named property for
the purpose of inspecting existing landscape trees and shrubs as they relate to
construction of a new garage.
The area east of the existing house has the most room for a garage, however, four existing
trees would be damaged/destroyed from either the footprint of the building or the new
driveway. This assessment was made using measurements taken from the trees, formulas
from "Trees and Development"by Methaney and Clark, published by the International
Society of Arboriculture.
The proposed construction would cut into the Critical Root Zone of the trees. These trees
are all too large to be transplanted, even with large mechanical equipment.
Please feel free to contact my office if you have any further questions.
4/25/01
City of Wheat Ridge
Board of Adjustment
Re: Case #WA-01-01
0040 heard Members;
We the undersigned reside in the 12000 block of West 32nd Drive
& are familiar with proposed addition on the property at 12141
West 32nd Drive. We believe this addition would enhance the
value of our homes and are in favor of the petition for a variance.
Thank you,
12001 _
12060
12061
12080
1208 i!
v-12121
X1214 -
~>12151
12161 see attach letter
12181 'v%c~a~i ?70 ~ovC_
April 10, 2001
To Whom it May Concern:
Re: The Property at 12141 W. 32nd Dr.
As next-door neighbors to the east of the Ankoviaks, we have no objections to the addition they
are proposing on the west side of their property. We feel that the conversion to a two-car garage
would definitely benefit the appearance of our neighborhood. As the Ankoviaks have the only
home on our block with a one-car garage, the addition would give the neighborhood a more
uniform look.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
6L
eff and Janiene Arellanes
12121 W. 32nd Dr.
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Jack Eme drp
12161 W. 32n Dr.
Wheat Ridge, CO 8003.3
April 13, 2001
Stan and Shayne Ankoviak
12141 W. 32nd Dr.
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Dear Stan and Shayne,
Thank you for sending us a diagram depicting the addition you
wish to make to your house. We have no objection to the addition
you propose. We wish you success with your plans-
Sincerely,
Jack and Peg Emery
pv O
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT
TO: Board of Adjustment
DATE OF MEETING: April 26, 2001 DATE PREPARED: April 16, 2001
CASE NO. & NAME: WA-01-01/Ankoviak CASE MANAGER: Travis Crane-
ACTION REQUESTED: Request for a 10' side yard setback variance from the 15' side yard setback
requirement in an R-1 zone, reducing the setback to 5' for the purpose of expanding
an attached garage.
LOCATION OF REQUEST:
NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT(S):
12141 W. 32nd Dr.
Shayne Ankoviak
12141 W. 32nd Dr.
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER(S):
APPROXIMATE AREA:
PRESENT ZONING:
PRESENT LAND USE:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
SURROUNDING LAND USE:
Same as Above
15,148 ft.z
R-1, Residential-One
Single - Family Residential
N:, S:, E:, & W: Residential-One
N:, S:, E:, and W: Single - Family Residential
DATE PUBLISHED: April 6, 2001
DATE POSTED: April 12, 2001
DATED LEGAL NOTICES SENT: April 12, 2001
ENTER INTO RECORD:
( ) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS
(X) ZONING ORDINANCE ( ) SLIDES
( ) SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS (X) EXHIBITS
( ) OTHER
The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been met,
therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case.
I. REQUEST
The property in question is located at 12141 W. 32 ad Drive and is currently being used for single family
residential. The property is zoned R-1, Residential-One. (Exhibit 1, Zoning Map).
The applicant (owner) is requesting approval of a 10' side yard setback variance from the 15' side yard
setback requirement in an R-1 zone, reducing the setback to 5'. (Exhibit 2, Application and Exhibit 3,
Deed). The purpose of the variance request is to allow for an expansion of the existing garage.
II. SITE PLAN
The applicant has submitted a site plan showing the proposed location for the attached garage (Exhibit 4,
Site Plan). Exhibit 4 currently shows a side yard setback from the southwest property line of fifteen feet.
The requested variance would allow for an expansion of the attached garage, while providing extra storage
space for medical equipment. The applicants receive medical deliveries measuring approximately one cubic
foot once a week for their fourteen year old son. The applicants have stated that if the deliveries are left
outside on the front porch, the medicine will freeze and be deemed useless. The proposed addition would
encroach upon ten feet of the required fifteen feet needed in a Residential-One district, leaving a five foot
setback on the southwest property line. Pursuant to Section 26-10 (F) of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, a
one-family dwelling within the Residential-One zoning district must maintain a minimum fifteen foot side yard
setback.
There are no unique circumstances attributed to this property. At approximately 15,148 sq. ft., the parcel
exceeds the minimum lot area requirements for a single family house in the R-1 district. The property has a
lot width of 105 feet, which exceeds the minimum lot width for a single family home in the R-1 zone.
The applicant has also submitted a letter outlining the reasons for the requested variance (Exhibit 5,
Applicant Letter). This variance case was originally scheduled for the February meeting, bu the applicant
withdrew the application due to insufficient information.
Staff has received no objection to or public comment regarding this variance request thus far.
III. VARIANCE CRITERIA
Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a variance request:
Can the property in question yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if
permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in
which it is located?
If the request is denied, the property may yield a reasonable return in service and income. The
property is currently used as a single family residence and this use may continue on the property.
The property currently has an existing garage that could be utilized for storage.
Board of Adjustment Page 2
WA-01-01/ Ankoviak
2. If the variation were granted, would it alter the essential character of the locality?
Approval of this request could possibly alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The
surrounding neighborhood on West 32nd Drive is currently developed with single family residential
homes. All of the properties in the immediate vicinity are all zoned Residential-One (R-1). The
requested variance would reduce the side yard setback from 15 feet to 5 feet. The row of trees on
the southwest property line would have to be removed should this variance be granted. There are
currently a few encroachments into side yard setbacks in this neighborhood which stem from pre-
existing conditions. There has been one side yard variance requested and granted for the
neighborhood.
3. Would the particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the
specific property involved result in a particular hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished
from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out?
The lot in question has a typical rectangular shape. The lot meets the minimum standards for size
and width for a Residential-One (R-1) zone. There is a section of the rear yard that drops off
toward the gulch on the side north of the property. The house was placed towards the southwest
side of the property. There is a small section in the rear of the property which is located within the
flood plain. It may be more costly to place a structure in the rear yard, however, neither the flood
plain nor the topography do not deem the rear yard unusable or unbuildable.
4. Has the alleged difficulty or hardship been created by any person presently having an
interest in the property?
The applicant, who has sole interest of the property, has created a self-imposed hardship through
the desire to increase the size of the existing garage on the property. The required side yard
setback of 15 feet was in existence when the home was purchased by the applicant. There may be
other alternatives for locating the structure elsewhere on the property. There may also be other
alternatives to accomplish the ultimate goal of the applicant.
5. Would the granting of the variance be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located, by,
among other things, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property,
substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing the danger of fire or
endangering the public safety, or substantially diminishing or impairing property values
within the neighborhood?
There could be a potential problem with the drainage on the southwest side of the property. If the
variance were granted, the proposed structure would be located within five feet of the property
line. The run-off from the roof could potentially adversely affect the neighboring property. There
also seems to be a working utility easement on the southwest property line that could be impacted.
No easements are shown on the original subdivision plat or the improvement location certificate for
Board of Adjustment Page 3
WA-01-01 / Ankoviak
the property. This variance could potentially impair the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent
properties. Should this variance be granted, the side yard setback on the southwest side would be
reduced to 5 feet. This would reduce the overall building separation between the neighboring
property to the south to roughly 16 feet. Since the use of the property will remain as single family
residential, it would not increase congestion in the streets, nor would it increase the danger of fire.
It would not likely diminish property values within the neighborhood.
6. If criteria a through a are found, then, would the granting of the variance result in a
benefit or contribution to the neighborhood or the community, as distinguished from an
individual benefit on the part of the applicant, or would granting of the variance result in a
reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities?
The expansion of the attached garage would make delivery and service of medical equipment more
convenient for the homeowner. The current structure has an attached garage that might be suitable
for delivery drop-off. This would not have any beneficial effects for the surrounding properties nor
the neighborhood. Although this will be used as a drop-off for medical supplies, it will not result in
the reasonable accommodation of any person with disabilities.
IV. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION
Upon review of the above request, staff concludes that the above criteria do not support the
variance request. Staff has found that there are no unique circumstances attributed to this request
that would warrant approval of a variance. Therefore, staff recommends DENIAL for the following
reasons:
1. The plight of the owner is not due to unique circumstances.
2. The conditions involving the property have not resulted in a particular hardship upon the owner,
but are a mere inconvenience.
3. The hardship was self-created by the property owner.
4. The proposed addition would alter the essential character of the neighborhood.
5. The proposed addition would impair the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties.
6. The proposed addition could potentially impact neighboring properties.
Board of Adjustment Page 4
WA-01-01/ Ankoviak
S it_e_'
OFFI 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN
Z O N I N G M 7~ i~ APPROXIMATE LOCATION)
WHEAT RIDGE
COLORADO
MAP ADOPTED: June 15, 1994
Last Revision: November 10, 1997
- ZONE DISTRICT BOUNDRY
- PARCEL/LOT BOUNDRY
(DESIGNATES OWNERSHIP)
CITY LIMIT LINE
WATER FEATURE
« DENOTE5 MULTIPLE ADDRE55E5
N
H-
NE 21~?
rvazrx
o m w xo ra Iro
SCALE 1'=400
RTME4T OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT - 235-2652
EXHIBIT 1
, LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION
Planning and De%'elopment Department
7500 West 29th Avenue. Wheat Ridge. CO 80033
Phone (303) 235-2846
iPlease print of type all information'
Applicant aV1 d Address I ~),)J LJ Phone ,-~03 3k~AS~7
State Zip %DDY-2~ Fax
City Wl~eat i C p
Owner ? p1;C Address f~~y W 3ah6~( Phone 2503a3AS~7
City o (l a 2, State C Zip D D 3 Fax
Contact A o v i ci-k Address I I L)l k) -?>~Iyy\ Phone 30 Q 3a I to
City G r- ~C State ~ /Q Zip Dp Fax
;The person listed as contact will be contacted to answer questions regarding thi application, provide additional information when neccessai
post public hearing signs, and will receive a copy of the staff report prior to Public Hearing.)
Location of request (address): a C °~Ul CC)
Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request.)
Application submittal requirements on reverse side
Change of zone or zone conditions ❑ Special Use Permit
❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Subdivision: Minor (5 lots or less)
❑ Consolidation. Plat ❑ Subdivision: Major (More than 5 lots)
❑ Flood Plain Special Exception ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
❑ Interpretation of Code ❑ Street Vacation
❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Temporary Use, Building, Sign
n Nonconforming Use Change ❑•-rVariance / Waiver (.from Section
❑ Planned Building Group ❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment
Site Development Plan approval ❑,)Other:
Detailed ddescription of the request: VJe, 141 T) L-a t K-9 ~O bU; (t nz_
~%C X ,FRPI Yr1~1 ~ V~S2. C3 S P R,~!C~ S~rL c` P V~~~c~X S
le.s
Required information:
Assessors Parcel Number: Size of Lot (acres of square footage): ~X/S~/~1JSf
Current Zoning: Iii zones A-+ 8-1 Proposed Zoning: -2"C-
Current use: Proposed use: S&I+ne-
I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in
filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above, without whose consent the
requested action canno~ 104 ully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners must submit power-of-attorney from the
owner which ap V Fq~ n on his be alf.
Signature o ~ppIca
C 0 e. Subscribed and sworn to me this ACdday of 20-UL
•A B4 G' ~0 Notary ublic
` P My commission expires-I -aU -03
Date receiv ot3 Fee $ -00 Receipt No.C0161t1 6 Case No. W -0/-
Comp Plan De t 9
9 Zoning Quarter Section Map
Related Case No. Pre-App Mtg Date Case Manager T tv b rare
O
N
m
cu
m
0 10
I
N \
O Ln
O
O
O
a.
G
Q
0
O
J
a
LJ
}
0-1
m U
N z0
.
a)
x
W
LL
S LL
10 W
Z
LL 0
W
.o
z0
ZW
a
W
W N
W
x N
co
W
`yW
Z
Q
W
a
o Wx
v W
a
4
~ q
m O
Z4
0 O
m q
c
Q^ m
3
W
w W
0 -a
co
rn W
a
T
vim c `o
.gam ~ a
N m j
q
D H o U
1,
a W
N ~
z~
x4
H
O
O
W h
W N
h z
H
o m
T
C -m
0 C
U m
0
G
m
00
m
O H
U xO
o z
m m FC
N
o 0) j
'
m C
a
m O
0 d
N
O
x
m H
E
c 0
CT P
ro
Ip
~
W
U
i
m m
o E I
9
m H i
N i
i
c
m c
n
a q I
-
0
N
m
m
m 8
y
p I
m C C
O
x i
a
m
'
z i
a m a
m
O I
m ~ ~
a
I
O I
~ N
a
r1 E I
h
pl
o"m c
L 2`
G
h
0
~O
I
N
'
0
"
O
77 O m I
. O] OL..
L
m
J
N
I
to ° 1
m
O m N
O u: I
c
m m
O
O
qU W i
0 m
U
m
G .
o
N W W
c
m C9 I~ 0 I
ro
0
,~9
H o i
° E
a
v
3 fL"o I
m~ m
c
O i
H
m
y € a
m
r
r~~
3
i
~
c E
W
N .Tr 0 `U I
s
L U L
o
m `
`
c I
E I
m
o
> m
N
rn I
O > 0
m m l
$ I
m OC 0
U
~
I
~ ~
r=
'
N
m
a
m
q
o
o
z
6 N I
c
N•~ a
N
m Z o
a R
o
m
m a
a
W
o Y\
m - m
m
w
W
3 0 2
E
h
i m
O
H
w O
H C. q
tDW0
N h O
O W U
1o
H W =
O a O E
ac~u~n
o
m 0
m
° a
s N~
'
h
r
a
c
a
m "
E m
$ m N c rm. w N
n
N
U
C
m
.
0 G N TO p 0
m
d
C
0
m
~
ai LJ . m
mmo.
~
m m
~
m
m
G
a
z
0
C
QI N m E0 N
d 0
m
Oi m
$ m L m c ri
c i
m
~ L
LSI C N
O m C
10
m
U
L
Do 5
20 ro (0 'C
,
O' O
m
c 3
E E 31
m>
'
E
3
a
p
m
U
E
75
N N
G N m C a J
U
U
m
C U
L
N
C O
'
'
C
m_
0
,
o m
G
o
0
m a
m C N
m
6 N
O] >
'O C
F t0 C
0 E F
. N m
L
a 0
T O
m 'm
.
.
L a a. m c.:..Jl. T O
C@
m mm
m
m m N U
3
m
c O
m m m E~ m m
L
m
m m
>
m y O! m N 0 V C
a m0
0
G
OE
O
S
d
a 'Z m 0 ro
$
-
m N
os m
U c
m
9
m
E
m
N c
m o m
m m
o
a
o
arw
c ui =
a m m -mo
m Z,
m a
9 °
om
>
A ro
c
m a
m.o$ c•o_ `m
$
m
`m
m
-
p
~
J
Oc
OI
p O
O. 0 m
C tl`1 m m m m T
Z
U
0% C
L
N
R
o m y E
2
m
W
m 9
G
W
m c
1
a t$ m c .E o
`
¢ c
m
N
A's
E C7
0 m'>
o
N wpm
m m a S
'
°
w
W m
n
W
m@ m
m
a
m
m
z
3 rn
a
0
m
m
$ x
E v o
E
m
o
m•
c G
CC
O
J
t
o.
m
m
_
m E m
.0 o. rn@ ` m
rn
p 0
x
L 0 C
Y
r
M N E m-
z a
N
N m
O
Emm
2
°v
°
m
m m
O,
m m
rnm
~l
¢
¢
me
1`
`m
°
me
m m N> N
33•m ro o.m
L
¢
?
m
C
0
E
N E.
a L K 6
G
3
- L
m
~
0 0 m m G
G 0
p
~
t
O O
M
O
i
~
1
0
E f m
O C m 0 O~ N
E
~
1
E?
m
O
0 0
m
l
Z C
0 J
2
y
d
w 0 m 0
W NL.. N~ O C
0 O
5 W
LU
m
c
rn
O
x
O •
=
a
Se3Ern
m .G d s c
m
Ji
'
m m o
m
~ m
O
a
°
0 >
m
@a m
o,
m m
A - z
$G
PJ9 - tJ-,~ IyC-'ni -
L661 9 t M
w
~ Ol
m m
Z p '
a
m
m
~
m
O
°m
Z
W
N
a
y
m
q
m
a
a
c
t.
N
a
E
E
o
m U
5
q?
W
3 ~
m
di
~
•i
z ~ w
U
t O N W
O
N
n 3 W
y 'j~ P4
y
E <
c q
m q
'o a
m z
.3 0
m q
Ja
-a
m
z
N
>
c
.N_
m
G
H
G
-O~
F'
q
w
w
O
Z
3
dYyf -ba.r/I OWIOd
000 §6
~ n
op,
G/~II\ I V
V ~L Uv
t~
~O\
co ~ °
~v LO °v
} e
~WXU.~§M- 4M -1:27 MOF~cJ
Z_ '0),T Co P"g 00 67§
Ot 107
=0 ~MXD U =E K LOT
r,o~ poayew~e _
aup fiq..ado~d oq oo
~a6pa .0" gsip -so aw ~
9N
O i
d
Z
V 1131HX3
EXHIBIT 5
1,22,01
Stan & Shayne Ankoviak
12141 W 32nd Drive
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
City of Wheat Ridge
Planning & Development Dept
7500 W 29' Ave
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Attn: Travis Crane
Re: Variance in zoning for 12141 W 32nd Drive
Dear Mr. Crane:
This letter is to state our intent to ask for a zoning variance on our property at 12141 W
32nd Drive.
We would like to build an addition onto our existing garage, the addition would come to
within three feet of our property line on the west side of our property.
We are in need of additional secure storage space for our sons' medical equipment. We
receive weekly deliveries of medicine and equipment for our son who has short gut
syndrome. When deliveries are made my wife has generally been home to accept them.
Do to her work schedule she will no longer be able to be home to receive them. Our
intention is to let the delivery people use the addition to put the supplies in and service
the equipment.
I've enclosed some pictures with dimensions and addresses of other homes on our block
that are built closer than the 15' setback. Also as requested I've enclosed our deed and
survey with a rough site plan.
Yours truly,
Stan & Shayne Ankoviak
-
7500 West 29th Avenue
The City of
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215 Wheat Ridge
Telephone 303/ 235-2846
FAX 303/235-2857
April 12, 2001
Dear Property Owner:
This is to inform you that Case No. WA-01-01 a request for approval of a 12 foot side yard
setback variance from the 15 foot side yard setback requirement resulting in a proposed 3 foot
side yard setback for the purpose of constructing a garage addition for property located at 12141
West 32nd Drive and zoned Residential-One (R-1) will be heard by the Wheat Ridge Board of
Adjustment in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue on
April 26, 2001, at 7:30 p.m.
As an area resident or interested parry, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or
submit written comments.
If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at
303-235-2846. Thank you.
Planning Division.
CAKathy\B0A\pubnotice\wa0101.wpd
O
d
C
O
d
~
d
d
W
N
C
Z
3
D
~
D
rc
v
~
a
'd
U
L
u
`
O
Z
y
~
dl
~
N
d
R'
C
7
I
I
R
>
Q
j o w
O
N ~ N
N~
v
a
EO
m O
C O N
O O C
Eva
f0 w
#
0
0
0
0
`0
0
0
0
0
,'Cx- ~ a
~j
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
u
O
o
N
c
Y
N
IC
d
M
M
M
M
O M
M
M
M
M
C
4
d M
a
M
❑
M
.0
O
M
.0
0
Y M
a O
M
0,
M
0
Y
M
O m
M
N
10
O OJ
W
Y
N
W
C
W
C O
0
OJ
Z.
O
N
V I
T C O
C c O
`-6 °c O
V
O C O
J° O
U I C O
M C O
N c O
r O
y
N M U
y O
O
m M U
O
C (N' l U
Z U
f n M U
W O
N N_ U
U>
y
a
N N
m c'
N
O1
O N
r
N
m
m v
L m
O 0
2! m
N
Q rn
N
Zi m
N
> 6
Y
N
N
a
MlN~
ll V K
~~0-'
C~a'
M3 V
Cad'
N W K
O<O Q'
Z`OK
_
.
6.0
0 'O
y
N N
N N
R f6
❑ N N
-J N N
O N N
d
-O N N
a
d
N t6
N
M N
N
N C'
V N
L
!6 N
'O
~ N
N >t
d
L
d
>L
~ N
L
N
T~ L
L
~
L
~
L
>L
O
N >
C
>
C N N U
N
N
a
N
~ k, E
N
C
cL N
N
O
~
n
=
m
O
C U ciw
E
❑ ❑ 1:1 ® ❑ ❑
z
O
N
M
V
l0
f0
r
M
d
~O
~1J
~
« 1
~
~O
N
N
N
M
O
r
rn
rn
m
m
m
m
rn
m
m
r
N
a
°
rn
rn
m
m
m
O
O
rn
N
m
N
m
N
m
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y1
10
l0
~O
N
~O
~O
l0
N
V
i
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Q Q W ZO
n
n
r
n
r
W = (7 Fn
N
O~Q c~
?
a
40 Lu
z
c2
a
n
m
~U
~
J
N
O
w
G
O
9
z
z
w U
FO
v
v
T
.D
b
N
y
a
v
z
F
9
d
N 'I
-
C
d
J
pI
d
~
'O
C
C
~
y
N
~
u
~
a
m
Q
y
C
u
d
O
$
d
a
~
O
d
C
~
Z
d
~
dl
R'
C
I
I
I
K
>
K
d O 1
d
N O' O
W = d
N
o
a
y E
u
L
O d
c
E 1 .0
t0
#
0
0
0
x0~a
E: w d
w «
V
0
?
0
>
0
Q d
i
i
U
0
X
N
O
10
a
M
M
M
C
G
.J
M
O
M
O
` M
O
d
y
y
0 0
O~ O
y
j
y
a
>
U > m
>
w> m
N
m
d
Q
N
'
N
NN
'
y
j d
d
'y
y
d
d
L
T M N
C
D
pM R
p
NcM'1 N
O
-
0
V d d
d
.a
U
~ L
l N
,
d L °G
'O
L
L
O
C y N
w~ d N
Q
Q
C
O
N o
K ~U v~LLw
E
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
z
O
O
N
N
N
_d
u
~d
m
~d
°o
N
°o
r
w N
Y
Q
4
v
O
a
O
a
0
`o
m
m
rn
Q
N
N
N
O
d
a
E
~O
r
~O
r
~O
r
V
2
0
0
F
Q Q w
n
n
a
n
w=~ 0
3 CD >
0
N
0 < Z
a
Z
O w
Off = 3
A
N
C0
F
W
C
~i
O
td
z
L
U
N
tC
O
a
0
P,
m
v
7
N
Qw
O
d
E
z
N U
W
f'^ Q
a
C
d
T
A
d
h
a
y
U
a
0
`v
a
7
z
Y
H
I Gp 70
00
e
y WZb
Pi M
1
2l
OFFICIAL
ZONING MIAF
WHEAT RIDGE
COLORADO
MAP ADOPTED: June 15, 1994
Last Revision: November 10, 1997
r,•_•,~ 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN
~•'•_f (APPROXIMATE LOCATION)
ZONE DISTRICT BOUNDRY
- PARCEL/LOT SOUNDRY
(DESIGNATES OWNERSHIP)
- CITY LIMIT LINE
WATER FEATURE
« DENOTES MULTIPLE ADDRESSES
k LUv~
~I
N 2~
~TM
o m ¢o®
SCALE 1'-400
RTM34T OF PLANNING AND DE4aOPNRIT - 7354&51
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
•
Owner
:Carron Robert J/Joella
Marlene
Parcel :
074341
Site
:12132 W 32Nd Ave Wheat
Ridge 80033
Xfered :
10/31/1996
Mail
:12132 W 32Nd Ave Wheat
Ridge Cc 80033
Price :
$147,900
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
4 Bath:2.50 TotRm
: YB:1973 Pool:
B1dgSF:
1,640 Ac:
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
'
Owner
:Bohnker Norman E
Parcel :
077369
Site
:12142 W 32Nd Ave Wheat
Ridge 80033
Xfered :
03/27/1972
Mail
:12142 W 32Nd Ave Wheat
Ridge Co 80033
Price :
$37,500
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-238-1735
Bedrm:
Bath:2.50 TotRm
: YB:1970 Pool:
B1dgSF:
2,328 Ac:
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
•
-
Owner
:Pietrafeso Michael
Parcel :
078088
Site
:12122 W 32Nd Ave Wheat
Ridge 80033
Xfered
Mail
:12122 W 32Nd Ave Wheat
Ridge Cc 80033
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-234-1761
Bedrm:
Bath:1.75 TotRm
: YB:1972 Pool:
B1dgSF:
1,736 Ac:
-
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
•
Owner
:Daiss Keene I
Parcel :
078089
Site
:12182 W 32Nd Ave Wheat
Ridge 80033
Xfered :
03/22/1973
Mail
:12182 W 32Nd Ave Wheat
Ridge Co 80033
Price :
$38,500
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-233-4519
Bedrm:
Bath:2.50 TotRm
: YB:1970 Pool:
B1dgSF:
1,940 Ac:
*
: MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Mcclure Robert C Ii
Parcel :
078090
Site
:12232 W 32Nd Ave Wheat
Ridge 80033
Xfered :
10/26/2000
Mail
:12232 W 32Nd Ave Wheat
Ridge Co 80033
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
3 Bath:2.50 TotRm
: YB:1969 Pool:
B1dgSF:
1,295 Ac:
*
: MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
:
Owner
:Carey Mark S
Parcel :
078091
Site
:12173 W 31St Pl Wheat
Ridge 80215
Xfered :
02/13/1987
Mail
:12173 W 31St P1 Wheat
Ridge Cc 80215
Price :
$103,900
Use -
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-232-3842
Bedrm:
5 Bath:2.50 TotRm
: YB:1972 Pool:
B1dgSF:
1,575 Ac:
*
: MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Rico John D Jr
Parcel :
078092
Site
:12143 W 31St Pl Wheat
Ridge 80215
Xfered :
05/11/1973
Mail
:12143 W 31St Pl Wheat
Ridge Co 80215
Price :
$46,000
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-233-1766
Bedrm:
4 Bath:2.50 TotRm
: YB:1972 Pool:
Yea
B1dgSF:
1,575 Ac:
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
:
Owner
:Dell Colman Lee
Parcel :
078093
Site
:12103 W 31St Pl Wheat
Ridge 80215
Xfered :
07/09/1976
Mail
:12103 W 31St Pl Wheat
Ridge Co 80215
Price :
$74,500
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-237-8946
Bedrm:
Bath:2.50 TotRm
: YB:1972 Pool:
B1dgSF:
1,798 Ac:
*
: MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
•
Owner
:Wright Francis E
Parcel :
078094
Site
:12044 W 31St PI Wheat
Ridge 80215
Xfered :
05/12/1978
Mail
:12044 W 31St PI Wheat
Ridge Co 80215
Price :
$100,000
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-238-5585
Bedrm:
Bath:2.25 TotRm
: YB:1973 Pool:
B1dgSF:
2,199 Ac:
*
: MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Adams Glenda R
Parcel :
078152
Site
:12220 W 31St PI Wheat
Ridge 80215
Xfered :
12/03/1991
Mail
:12220 W 31St Pl Wheat
Ridge Cc 80215
Price :
$135,000
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
3 Bath:2.50 TotRm
: YB:1976 Pool:
B1dgSF:
2,428 Ac:
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Kenfield Allen F/Maril
yn A
Parcel :
078153
Site
:12290 W 31St P1 Denver
80215
Xfered :
08/02/1999
Mail
:12290 W 31St Pl Denver
Cc 80215
Price :
$250,000
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
4 Bath:2.50 TotRm
: YB:1977 Pool:
B1dgSF:
2,435 Ac:
The Information Provided 15 Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed.
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner Owner
:Olivas Jesus A
Parcel :
089357
Site
:*No Site Address*
Xfered :
01/24/1996
Mail
:1210 Union St Go n Co 80401
Price :
$135,000
Use
:1177 Vacant Rff9identiai,Limited Size
Phone
Bedrm:
Bat . TotRm: YB: Pool:
B1dgSF:
Ac*
- - MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Livingstone Scott L
Parcel :
110526
Site
:*No Site Address*'
Xfered :
03/15/1998
Mail
:11905 W Ple nt Ave Golden Cc 80401
Price :
$135,000
Use
:1155 Va t,Residential
Phone :
303-462-1258
Bedrm:
ath: TotRm: YB: Pool:
BldgSF:
Ac:
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
•
-
owner
:Pino David 0
Parcel :
127349
Site
:3234 Taft Ct Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
12/15/1983
Mail
:3234 Taft Ct Wheat Ridge Cc 80033
Price :
$248,900
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-232-1682
Bedrm:
3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1983 Pool:
B1dgSF:
2,744 Ac:
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Wallis Charles Stewart
Parcel :
127350
Site
:3244 Taft Ct Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
07/06/1998
Mail
:3244 TaftCt Wheat Ridge Co 80033
Price :
$322,500
Use
.:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-238-8328
Bedrm:
5 -Bath:3.00 TotRm: YB:1983 Pool:
B1dgSF:
2,955 Ac:
*
• Met=Scan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Marvel James C Jr
Parcel :
127351
Site
:3254 Taft Ct Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
04/05/1985
Mail
:3254 Taft Ct Wheat Ridge Co 80033
Price :
$44,800
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1987 Pool:
BldgSF:
3,082 Ac:
: MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Goldfain Paul D
Parcel :
127352
Site
:3264 Taft Ct Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
02/25/1991
Mail
:3264 Taft Ct Wheat Ridge Cc 80033
Price :
$223,000
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-238-8953
Bedrm:
4 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1983 Pool:
BldgSF:
3,371 Ac:
*
: MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Hutchcroft Jay L/Sandra E
Parcel :
127502
Site
:3263 Taft Ct Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
03/22/1995
Mail
:3263 Taft Ct Wheat Ridge Co 80033
Price :
$290,000
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-233-1083
Bedrm:
4 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1983 Pool:
B1dgSF:
3,039 Ac:
*
: MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Harberson David
Parcel :
127860
Site
:3253 Taft Ct Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
04/12/1988
Mail
:3253 Taft Ct Wheat Ridge Cc 80033
Price :
$199,200
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-233-2314
Bedrm:
4 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1988 Pool:
B1dgSF:
2,511 Ac:
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Popiel Bernadette T
Parcel :
127861
Site
:3243 Taft Ct Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
12/22/1997
Mail
:3243 Taft Ct Wheat Ridge Cc 80033
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
3 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1983 Pool:
131dgSF:
2,502 Ac:
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
•
Owner
:Bradley Timothy K
Parcel :
128346
Site
:3233 Taft Ct Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
06/05/1987
Mail
:3233 Taft Ct Wheat Ridge Cc 80033
Price :
$44,300
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-233-1947
Bedrm:
4 Bath:l.75 TotRm: YB:1988 Pool:
B1dgSF:
2,468 Ac:
*
: MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Thorsheim Laurenc
Parcel :
147967
Site
:*No Site Add s*
Xfered :
05/12/1977
Mail
:1350 We1c t Golden Co 80401
Price
Use
:1177 V ant, Residential,Limited Size
Phone :
303-237-1938
Bedrm:
Bath: TotRm: YB: Pool:
B1dgSF:
Ac:
The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed.
*_1 : MetroScan /
Jefferson
(CO) •
Owner
:Hill Hubert J
Parcel :
196271
Site
:-No Site Addre
Xfered :
04/21/1977
Mail
:785 Coors S olden Cc 80401
Price :
$9,900
Use
:1177 Va t,Residential,Limited Size
Phone :
303-238-4610
Bedrm:
i" ath: TotRm: YB:
Pool:
BldgSF:
Ac*
- - MetroScan /
Jefferson
(CO)
-
Owner
:City Of Lakewood
-
Parcel :
196273
Site
:*No Site Addres -
Xfered :
02/18/1977 .
Mail
:445 S Allis Pkwy Lakewood Co 80226
Price
Use
:9149 Ex m:pt,Political Sub,Land
Phone
Bedrm:
- at h: TotRm: YB:
Pool:
BldgSF:
Ac*.
53
- : MetroScan /
Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Wcp Llc
Parcel :
202783
Site
:*No Site Address*
Xfered :
10/30/1997
Mail
:250 Crawford D olden Co 80401
Price :
$396,600
Use
:1111 Vacan esidential
Phone
Bedrm:
B TotRm: YB:
Pool:
BldgSF:
Ac:4
.04
- MetroScan /
Jefferson
(CO)
Owner Owner
:Jennie Sue Condominium Assoc
Parcel :
422461
Site
:*No Site Address*
Xfered :
02/22/1996
Mail
:1316 Urban St Go 0 60401
Price
Use
:4151 Agr,H Owner Association
Phone
Bedrm:
Yfi: TotRm: YB;
Pool:
BldgSF:
Ac:.
20
*
• MetroScan /
Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Hawley Joseph W
Parcel :
428962
Site
:*No Site Address*
Xfered :
04/16/1998
Mail
:1075 Youngfield Golden Co 80401
Price
Use
:1111 V
a
c
an esidential
Phone :
303-237-8668
Bedrm:
^
~
~
imt_ TotRm: YB:
Pool:
BldgSF:
Ac:.
27
*
v
• MetroScan /
Jefferson
(CO) ;
Owner
:Higbie Lee
Parcel :
431510
Site
:*No Site Addr
Xfered :
06/10/1999
Mail
:11920 W S rity Ave Golden Co 80901
Price
Use
:1111 V ant,Residential
Phone :
303-238-4354
Bedrm:
Bath: TotRm: YB:
Pool:
BldgSF:
Ac:.
19
*
• MetroScan /
Jefferson
(CO) •
Owner
:O Connor Thomas D
Parcel :
431911
Site
:*No Site Addre
Xfered :
07/23/1999
Mail
:11810 W Co ax Ave Lakewood Cc 80215
Price :
$7,000
Use
:1111 Vacant,Residential
Phone :
303-233-0200
Bedrm:
i`Bath: TotRm: YB:
Pool:
BldgSF:
Ac:.
07
The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed.
U)40 %I
9
e
MetroScan / Jeffe
rson -
,
Owner
:Arellanes Janiene T/Jefferey A
Schedule
:032189
Site
:12121 W 32Nd Dr Wheat Ridge 80033
Parcel
:39 291 10 023
Mail
:12121 W 32Nd Dr Wheat Ridge Co 80033
Xferd
:07/20/1999
LandUse
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Price
TaxDist
:3130
OwnerPh
:303-232-1177
Bedrm:
Bth:1.75 YB:1963 Parking:Attached
Firepl:2
TotArea:2,030 Ac:
' MetroScan / Jefferson ' -
-
Owner
:Kent Friz T
Schedule
:032356
Site
:12140 W 32Nd Dr Wheat Ridge 80033
Parcel
:39 291 11 003
Mail
:12140 W 32Nd Dr Wheat Ridge Cc 80033
Xferd
:12/07/1993
LandUse
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Price
TaxDist
:3130
OwnerPh
:303-238-8824
Bedrm:3
3th:1.75 YB:1961 Parking:Attached
Firepl:l
TotArea:1,404 Ac:
MetroScan / Jefferson • -
Owner
:Clark Robert C
Schedule
:032425
Site
:12151 W 32Nd Dr Wheat Ridge 80033
Parcel
:39 291 11 001
Mail
:12151 W 32Nd Dr Wheat Ridge Cc 80033
Xferd
:10/22/1991
LandUse
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Price
:$105,000
TaxDist
:3130
OwnerPh
:303-239-9168
Bedrm:4
Bth:1.75 YB:1961 Parking:Attached
Firepl:
TotArea:2,461 Ac:
*
• MetroScan / Jeffe
rson -
Owner
:Ankoviak Stanley J/Shayne L
Schedule
:032479
Site
:12141 W 32Nd Dr Wheat Ridge 80033
Parcel
:39 291 10 022
Mail
:12141 W 32Nd Dr Wheat Ridge Co 80033
Xferd
:05/16/1997
LandUse
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Price
:$168,000
TaxDist
:3130
OwnerPh
:303-232-5267
Bedrm:4
Bth:2.50 YB:1962 Parking:Attached
Firepl:2
TotArea:1,382 Ac:
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson -
Owner
:Marino ry J/Char1een
Schedule
:032496
Site
:12025 W 3 d Ave Wheat Ridge 80033
Parcel
:39 291 00 008
Mail
:12025 W 32N ve Wheat Ridge Co 80033
Xferd
:05/31/1996
LandUse
:1112 Res, Impro Land
Price
:$125,500
TaxDist
:3130
OwnerPh
:303-232-2375
Bedrm:4
Bth:2.50 YB:1957 Parking:Detached
Firepl:l
TotArea:1,361 Ac:.38
\
MetroScan / Jefferson -
Owner
:Eick Je ey Allen/Mary Louise
Schedule
:032582
Site
:12005 W 32 d Ave Wheat Ridge 80033
Parcel
:39 291 00 009
Mail
:3205 Union Westminster Co 80030
Xferd
:01/06/1999
LandUse
:1112 Res, Impr ed Land
Price
TaxDist
:3130
OwnerPh
Bedrm: -
Bth:1.75 YB:1956 Parking:Basement
Firepl:l
TotArea:1,656 Ac:.31
MetroScan / Jefferson : -
Owner
:Sabatka Adrian A
Schedule
:032584
Site
:12181 W 32Nd Dr Wheat Ridge 80033
Parcel
:39 291 10 020
Mail
:12181 W 32Nd Dr Wheat Ridge Co 80033
Xferd
:08/30/1971
LandUse
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Price
:$30,000
TaxDist
:3130
OwnerPh
:303-233-8626
Bedrm:
Bth:1.75 YB:1962 Parking:Attached
Firepl:l
TotArea:2,044 Ac:
MetroScan / Jefferson ; -
Owner
:Emery Jack W
Schedule
:032586
Site
:12161 W 32Nd Dr Wheat Ridge 80033
Parcel
:39 291 10 021
Mail
:12161 W 32Nd Dr Wheat Ridge Co 80033
Xferd
:09/25/1987
LandUse
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Price
:$137,000
TaxDist
:3130
OwnerPh
:303-238-9346
Bedrm:4
Bth:1.75 YB:1966 Parking:Attached
Firepl:l
TotArea:1,717 Ac:
• MetroScan / Jefferson • -
Owner
:City Of Lakewood
Schedule
:056926
Site
;*No Site Address*
Parcel
:49 051 12 004
Mail
:445 S Allison Pkwy Denver Cc 80226
Xferd
:03/17/1982
LandUse
:9149 Exempt,Political Sub,Land
Price
TaxDist
:7029
OwnerPh
Bedrm:
Bth: YB: Parking:
Firepl:
TotArea: Ac:
The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed.
MetroScan / Jefferson
Owner
:Elliott Sharon J
Schedule
056987
Site
:-No Site Address*
Parcel
:49 051 14 022
Mail
:11681 W Pleasant Ave Golden Cc 80401
Xferd
:05/04/1982
LandUse
:1155 Vacant,Residential
Price
TaxDist
:7029
OwnerPh
Bedrm:
Bth: YB: Parking:
Firepl:
TotArea: Ac:
• MetroScan
/ Jefferson : -
Owner
:Mayer RichardC
Schedule
:057123
Site
:*No Site Address*
Parcel
:49 051 00 010
Mail
:12243 W 13Th Ave Golden Cc 80401
Xferd
:02/24/1999
LandUse
:1155 Vacant,Residential
Price
:$390,000
TaxDist
:4462
OwnerPh
Bedrm:
Bth: YB: Parking:
Firepl:
TotArea:
MetroScan
/ Jefferson
Owner
:Tavenner Jon C
Schedule
:057132
Site
:*No Site Address*
Parcel
:49 051 15 010
Mail
:11835 W 12Th Ave Golden Co 80401
Xferd
:08/22/1995
LandUse
:1155 Vacant,Residential
Price
TaxDist
:7027
OwnerPh
:303-237-9991
Bedrm:
Bth: YB: Parking:
Firepl:
TotArea:
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson -
Owner
:Hatchett William E
Schedule
:057311
Site
:*No Site Address*
Parcel
:49 051 14 027
Mail
:11771 W Pleasant Ave Golden Cc 80401
Xferd
:02/14/1995
LandUse
:1155 Vacant,Residential
Price
:$38,000
TaxDist
:7029
OwnerPh
:303-233-7770
Bedrm:
Bth: YB: Parking:
Firepl:
TotArea:
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson -
Owner
:Mcdonald James M/Sharon K
Schedule
:057382
Site
:*No Site Address*
Parcel
:49 051 02 012
Mail
:PO Box 646 Frederick Co 80530
Xferd
:03/07/1997
LandUse
:1111 Vacant,Residential
Price
:$82,000
TaxDist
:7041
OwnerPh
Bedrm:
Bth: YB: Parking:
Firepl:
TotArea:
*
y
• MetroScan / Jefferson
'
Owner
:Per.
Angelo
Schedule
:073119
Site
:12022 W 32Nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033
Parcel
:39.294 05 001
Mail
:12022 2Nd Ave Wheat Ridge Cc 80033
Xferd
:10/03/1990
LandUse
:1112 Res, roved Land
Price
:$110,000
TaxDist
:3130
OwnerPh
Bedrm:3
Bth:2.50 YB:1969 Parking:Attached
Firepl:2
TotArea:1,691
*
MetroScan / Jeffe
rson
Owner
:Olivas Jesus A
Schedule
:089357
Site
:*No Site Address*
Parcel
:49 051 15 004
Mail
:1210 Union St Golden Cc 80401
Xferd
:01/24/1996
LandUse
:1177 Vacant,Residential,Limited Size
Price
:$135,000
TaxDist
:7027
OwnerPh
Bedrm:
Bth: YB: Parking:
Firepl:
TotArea:
*
MetroScan / Jeffe
rson -
Owner
:Livingstone Scott L
Schedule
:110526
Site
:*No Site Address*
Parcel
:49 051 14 030
Mail
:11905 W Pleasant Ave Golden Cc 80401
Xferd
:03/15/1998
LandUse
:1155 Vacant,Residential
Price
:$135,000
TaxDist
:7027
OwnerPh
:303-462-1258
Bedrm:
Bth: YB: Parking:
Firepl:
TotArea:
*
MetroScan / Jefferson
Owner
:Thorsheim Laurence M
Schedule
:147967
Site
:*No Site Address*
Parcel
:49 051 08 008
Mail
:1350 Welch St Golden Cc 80401
Xferd
:05/12/1977
LandUse
:1177 Vacant,Residential,Limited Size
Price
TaxDist
:4462
OwnerPh
:303-237-1438
Bedrm:
Bth: YB: Parking:
Firepl:
TotArea:
*
*
Ac:.38
Ac:
Ac:
*
*
Ac:
Ac:
Ac:
Ac:
Ac:
The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed.
• MetroScan /
Jefferson :
Owner
:Hill Hubert J
Schedule
:196271
Site
:*No Site Address*
Parcel
:49 051 13 002
Mail
:785 Coors St Golden Co 80401
Xferd
:04/21/1977
LandUse
:1177 Vacant,Residential,Limited Size Price
:$9,900
TaxDist
:7027
OwnerPh
:303-238-4610
Bedrm:
Bth: YB: Parking:
Firepl:
TotArea:
Ac:
*
• MetroScan /
Jefferson
Owner
:Wcp L1c
Schedule
:202783
Site
:*No Site Address*
Parcel
:49 051 00 021
Mail
:250 Crawford Or Golden Co 80401
Xferd
:10/30/1997
LandUse
:1111 Vacant,Residential
Price
:$396,600
TaxDist
:4462
OwnerPh
Bedrm:
Bth: YB: Parking:
Firepl:
TotArea:
Ac:4.04
*
• MetroScan /
Jefferson
Owner
:Jennie Sue Condominium Assoc
Schedule
:422461
Site
:*No Site Address*
Parcel
:49 051 05 013
Mail
:1316 Urban St Golden Co 80401
Xferd
:02/22/1996
LandUse
:4151 Agr,Home Owner Association
Price
TaxDist
:4462
OwnerPh
Bedrm:
Bth: YB: Parking:
Firepl:
TotArea:
Ac:.20
• MetroScan /
Jefferson
Owner
:Hawley Joseph W
Schedule
:428962
Site
:*No Site Address*
Parcel
:49 051 15 018
Mail
:1075 Youngfield St Golden Co 80401
Xferd
:04/16/1998
LandUse
:1111 Vacant,Residential
Price
TaxDist
:7027
OwnerPh
:303-237-8668
Bedrm:
Bth: YB: Parking:
Firepl:
TotArea:
Ac:.27
MetroScan /
Jefferson
Owner
:Higbie Lee
Schedule
:431510
Site
:*No Site Address*
Parcel
:49 051 04 034
Mail
:11920 W Security Ave Golden Co 80401 Xferd
:06/10/1999
LandUse
:1111 Vacant,Residential
Price
TaxDist
:7029
OwnerPh
:303-238-4354
Bedrm:
Bth: YB: Parking:
Firepl:
TotArea:
Ac:.19
*
' MetroScan /
Jefferson
Owner
:0 Connor Thomas D
Schedule
:431911
Site
:*No Site Address*
Parcel -
:49 051 01 025
Mail
:11810 W Colfax Ave Lakewood Co 8021
5 Xferd
:07/23/1999
LandUse
:1111 Vacant,Residential
Price
:$7,000
TaxDist
:7041
OwnerPh
:303-233-0200
Bedrm:
Bth: YB: Parking:
Firepl:
TotArea:
Ac:.07
The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed.
*
MetroScan / Jefferson
Owner
:Beattie Daniel M
Schedule
:032409
Site
:3312 Vivian Dr Wheat Ridge 80033
Parcel
:39 291 10 011
Mail
:3312 Vivian Dr Wheat Ridge Cc 80033
Xferd
:05/20/1999
LandUse
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Price
:$219,000
TaxDist
:3130
OwnerPh
Bedrm:5
3th:2.25 YB:1966 Parking:Attached
Firepl:l
TotArea:1,203
Ac:
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson •
Owner
:Robbins Cynthia C
Schedule
:032410
Site
:3322 Vivian Dr Wheat Ridge 80033
Parcel
:39 291 10 010
Mail
:3322 Vivian Dr Wheat Ridge Cc 80033
Xferd
:05/06/1988
LandUse
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Price
TaxDist
:3130
OWnerPh
:303-233-8322
Bedrm:
Bth:1.75 YB:1962 Parking:Attached
Firepl:
TotArea:1,330
Ac:
*
' MetroScan / Jefferson
Owner
:Stone Walter R Jr
Schedule
:032461
Site
:3352 Vivian Dr Wheat Ridge 80033
Parcel
:39 291 10 009
Mail
:3352 Vivian Dr Wheat Ridge Cc 80033
Xferd
:03/19/1999
LandUse
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Price
TaxDist
:3130
OwnerPh
:303-232-6729
Bedrm:
Bth:2.50 YB:1962 Parking:Attached
Firepl:2
TotArea:1,848
Ac:
MetroScan / Jefferson ;
Owner
:Calhoun Gary R
Schedule
:032518
Site
:3302 Vivian Dr Wheat Ridge 80033
Parcel
:39 291 10 012
Mail
:3302 Vivian Dr Wheat Ridge Cc 80033
Xferd
:02/04/1999
LandUse
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Price
TaxDist
:3130
OwnerPh
:303-275-0617
Bedrm:
Bth:2.50 YB:1962 Parking:Attached
Firepl:2
TotArea:1,767
Ac:
The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed.
MetroScan / Jefferson
Owner
:Osborne Don M
Schedule
:032449
Site
:12081 W 32Nd Dr Wheat
Ridge 80033
Parcel
:39 291 10 024
Mail
:12081 W 32Nd Dr Wheat
Ridge Co 80033
Xferd
:05/28/1992
LandUse
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Price
:$90,000
TaxDist
:3130
OwnerPh
:303-232-6728
Bedrm:3
Bth:1.75 YB:1966
Parking:Attached
Firepl:l
TotArea:1,685
MetroScan / Jefferson
Owner
:Nelson Dennis G
Schedule
:032513
Site
:12080 W 32Nd Dr Wheat
Ridge 80033
Parcel
:39 291 11 004
Mail
:12080 W 32Nd Dr Wheat
Ridge Co 80033
Xferd
:11/18/1991
LandUse
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Price
:$125,000
TaxDist
:3130
OwnerPh
:303-233-4735
Bedrm:4
Bth:2.25 YB:1961
Parking:Built-In
Firepl:
TotArea:2,418
*
Ac:
Ac:
The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed.
* • MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) •
Owner
:Babkiewich Marie E
Parcel :
032161
Site
:3292 Vivian Dr Wheat Ridge 80033 -
Xfered
Mail
:3292 Vivian Dr Wheat Ridge Co 80033
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-237-7861
Bedrm:
Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1962 Pool:
BidgSF:
1,734 Ac:
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) :
Owner
:Schwartz Robert L
Parcel :
032162
Site
:11880 Tabor Dr Lakewood 80215
Xfered
Mail
:11880 Tabor Dr Lakewood Cc 80215
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-232-1959
Bedrm:
3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1959 Pool:
B1dgSF:
1,368 Ac:
MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) •
owner
:Plomondon James L
Parcel :
032167
Site
:11895 Tabor Dr Lakewood 80215
Xfered
Mail
:11895 Tabor Dr Lakewood Co 80215
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-233-9032
Bedrm:
3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1961 Pool:
B1dgSF:
1,442 Ac:
*
: MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) •
Owner
:Opp James H
Parcel :
032176
Site
:3232 Vivian Dr Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
09/26/1992
Mail
:3232 Vivian Dr Wheat Ridge Cc 80033
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-232-5431
Bedrm:
Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1962 Pool:
B1dgSF:
1,804 Ac:.27
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) •
Owner
:Berger Lewis C
Parcel :
032178
Site
:12366 W 34Th PI Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered
Mail
:12366 W 34Th 21 Wheat Ridge Co 80033
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-238-6939
Bedrm:
4 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1962 Pool:
B1dgSF:
2,417 Ac:
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Arellanes Janiene T/Jefferey A
Parcel :
032189
Site
:12121 W 32Nd Dr Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
07/20/1999
Mail
:12121 W 32Nd Dr Wheat Ridge Co 80033
Price .
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-232-1177
Bedrm:
Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1963 Pool:
B1dgSF:
2,030 Ac:
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) •
Owner
:Clark Harold H
Parcel :
032192
Site
:11870 Tabor Dr Lakewood 80215
Xfered :
10/17/1977
Mail
:11870 Tabor Dr Lakewood Co 80215
Price :
$61,000
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land -
Phone :
303-232-2047
Bedrm:
3 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1959 Pool:
BidgSF:
1,447 Ac:
*
MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Torborg Paul
Parcel :
032211
Site
:3252 Vivian Dr Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
04/03/2000
Mail
:3252 Vivian Dr Wheat Ridge Cc 80033
Price :
$199,000
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1962 Pool:
B1dgSF:
1,549 Ac:
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) :
Owner
:Macintyre Verna
Parcel :
032239
Site
:3315 Vivian Ct Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
11/08/1982
Mail
:3315 Vivian Ct Wheat Ridge Cc 80033
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-238-6965
Bedrm:
Bath:1.75 TctRm: YB:1961 Pool:
B1dgSF:
1,463 Ac:
*
: MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Graham Earl L
Parcel
:032243
Site
:3282 Vivian Dr Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered
Mail
:3282 Vivian Dr Wheat Ridge Co 80033
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
:303-233-4998
Bedrm:
Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1962 Pool:
BidgSF
:1,293 Ac:
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) :
Owner
:Mcnamee Mark/Linda K
Parcel
:032246
Site
:3231 Vivian Dr Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered
:04/01/1996
Mail
:3231 Vivian Dr Wheat Ridge Cc 80033
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
:303-237-7583
Bedrm:
4 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1962 Pool:
B1dgSF
:1,680 Ac:
The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed.
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) •
Owner
:Richard J Loose Trust The
Parcel
:032276
Site
:3371 Vivian Dr Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered
:11/02/1999
Mail
:3371 Vivian Dr Wheat Ridge Cc 80033
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
4 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1962 Pool:
B1dgSF
:1,759 Ac:
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
-
Owner
:Donald A Gray Trust
Parcel
:032282
Site
:11875 Tabor Dr Lakewood 80215
Xfered
:08/31/1993
Mail
:11875 Tabor Dr Lakewood Cc 80215
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1959 Pool:
B1dgSF
:1,450 Ac:
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) •
Owner
:Mullen Timothy Scott
Parcel
:032292
Site
:3291 Vivian Dr Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered
:11/04/1999
Mail
:3291 Vivian Dr Wheat. Ridge Co 80033
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
:303-237-2528
Bedrm:
Bath:1.75- TotRm: YB:1962 Pool:
B1dgSF
:1,890 Ac:
*
MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) :
Owner
:Hunter Mark R
Parcel :
032312
Site
:11890 Tabor Dr Lakewood 80215
Xfered :
07/15/1986
Mail
:11890 Tabor Dr Lakewood Cc 80215
Price :
$138,000
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-237-9866
Bedrm:
4 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1960 Pool:
. B1dgSF:
1,344 Ac:
MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) •
Owner
:Osse David J/Kathleen M
Parcel :
032320
Site
:12061 W 32Nd Dr Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
02/15/1996
Mail
:12061 W 32Nd Dr Wheat Ridge Cc 80033
Price :
$160,000
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-238-1702
Bedrm:
Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1962 Pool:
BldgSF:
2,044 Ac:
*
MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) •
Owner
:Romero Richard L Jr/Deanna L
Parcel :
032331
Site
:12296 W 34Th PI Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
09/03/1997
Mail
:12296 W 34Th P1 Wheat Ridge Cc 80033
Price :
$171,000
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
5 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1962 Pool:
. B1dgSF:
1,498 Ac:
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) :
Owner
:Kozlowski Alfred J
Parcel :
032339
Site
:3381 Vivian Dr Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
05/28/1991
Mail
:3381 Vivian Or Wheat Ridge Co 80033
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-238-3115
Bedrm:
4 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1962 Pool:
B1dgSF:
2,647 Ac:
*
MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) :
Owner
:Bedell James E/Kathleen M
Parcel :
032344
Site
:12375 W 34Th P1 Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
12/29/1997
Mail
:12375 W 34Th P1 Wheat Ridge Co 80033
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-233-7874
Bedrm:
5 Bath:3.00 TotRm: YB:1961 Pool:
B1dgSF:
1,872 Ac:
*
MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) :
Owner
:Kent Friz T
Parcel :
032356
Site
:12140 W 32Nd Dr Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
12/07/1993
Mail
:12140 W 32Nd Dr Wheat Ridge Cc 80033
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-238-8824
Bedrm:
3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1961 Pool:
B1dgSF:
1,404 -Ac:
*
MetroScan
Jefferson
(CO) :
Owner
:Lamoreaux Alfred S
Parcel :
032360
Site
:12335 W 34Th Pl Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
05/23/1997
Mail
:12335 W 34Th PI Wheat Ridge Co 80033
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-233-2344
Bedrm:
Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1962 Pool:
BldgSF:
1,350 Ac:
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
-
Owner
:Eastwood James Martin/Lilyan M
Parcel :
032378
Site .
:12345 W 32Nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
09/10/1997
Mail
:12345 W 32Nd Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80033
Price :
$135,000
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-274-1026
Bedrm:
3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1962 Pool:
B1dgSF:
1,780 Ac:
The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed.
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) '
Owner
:Smit Janice M
Parcel :
032386
Site
:12315 W 34Th P1 Wheat Ridge
80033
Xfered :
01/22/1981
Mail
:12315 W 34Th PI Wheat Ridge
Co 80033
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-234-9645
Bedrm:
Bath:1.75 TotRm:
YB:1962 Pool:
B1dgSF:
2,103 Ac:
• Met
roScan / Jefferson
(CO) '
Owner
:Kaye E Greenburg Trust The
Parcel :
032387
Site
:12295 W 34Th PI Wheat Ridge
80033
Xfered :
03/11/1997
Mail -
:12295 W 34Th P1 Wheat Ridge
Cc 80033
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone-
Bedrm:
Bath:l.75 TotRm:
YB:1962 Pool:
B1dgSF:
1,995 Ac:
Met
roScan / Jefferson
(CO) •
Owner
:Bayuk Ann M
Parcel :
032400
Site
:12376 W 34Th P1 Wheat Ridge
80033
Xfered :
02/24/1984
Mail
:12376 W 34Th 21 Wheat Ridge
Cc 80033
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-237-7371
Bedrm:
Bath:1.75 TotRm:
YB:1962 Pool:
B1dgSF:
1,850 Ac:
: MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) •
Owner
:Hillenburg Gerald E
Parcel :
032402
Site
:3391 Vivian Or Wheat Ridge
80033
Xfered
Mail
:3391 Vivian Or Wheat Ridge
Cc 80033
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-238-8696
Bedrm:
Bath:1.75 TotRm:
YB:1962 Pool:
,3ldgSF:
1,489 Ac:
*
- MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) '
Owner
:Naida L Durbin Trust
Parcel :
032403
Site
:3383 Vivian Or Wheat Ridge
80033
Xfered :
07/16/1993
Mail
:3383 Vivian Or Wheat Ridge
Cc 80033
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
. Bath:1.75 TotRm:
YB:1962 Pool:
B1dgSF:
1,875 Ac:
*
MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) •
Owner
:Visher Frank N
Parcel :
032404
Site
:3351 Vivian Ct Wheat Ridge
80033
Xfered
Mail
:3351 Vivian Ct Wheat Ridge
Cc 80033
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-232-6765
Bedrm:
4 Bath:1.75 TotRm:
YB:1962 Pool:
B1dgSF:
2,647 Ac:
MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) '
Owner
:Borri Ruth'J/Patricia A
Parcel :
032405
Site
:3341 Vivian Ct Wheat Ridge
80033
Xfered :
05/08/1997
Mail
:3341 Vivian Ct Wheat Ridge
Cc 80033
Price :
$186,900
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
4 Bath:2.50 TotRm:
YB:1962 Pool:
B1dgSF
:2,634 Ac:
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) '
Owner
:Harr Gerald O
Parcel
:032406
Site
:3331 Vivian Ct Wheat Ridge
80033
Xfered
Mail
:3331 Vivian Ct Wheat Ridge
Co 80033
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
:303-237-1262
Bedrm:
Bath:1.75 TotRm:
YB:1962 Pool:
B1dgSF
:1,434 Ac:
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Vigil Diana M
Parcel
:032407
Site
:3251 Vivian Or Wheat Ridge
80033
Xfered
:09/11/2000
Mail
:3251 Vivian Or Wheat Ridge
Co 80033
Price
:$258,500
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
3 Bath:2.00 TotRm:
Y3:1962 Pool:
B1dgSF
:2,011 Ac:
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) :
Owner
:Scotella Rocco A
Parcel
:032408
Site
:3241 Vivian Or Wheat Ridge
80033
Xfered
:03/06/1987
Mail
:3241 Vivian Or Wheat Ridge
Cc 80033
Price
:$95,000
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
:303-238-2980
Bedrm:
4 Bath:2.25 TotRm:
YB:1962 Pool
: BldgSF
:1,989 Ac:
MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Grosjean Gene L
Parcel
:032417
Site
:3261 Vivian Or Wheat Ridge
80033
Xfered
:01/28/1986
Mail
:3261 Vivian Or Wheat Ridge
Cc 80033
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
Bath:1.75 TotRm:
YB:1962 Pool
: B1dgSF
:1,754 Ac:
The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed.
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Schilling Robert C
Parcel :
032424
Site
:3222 Vivian Dr Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
09/04/1997
Mail
:3222 Vivian Dr Wheat Ridge Cc 80033
Price :
$159,900
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm
:4 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1962 Pool:
B1dgSF:
2,598 Ac:.21
: MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Clark Robert C
Parcel :
032425
Site
:12151 W 32Nd Dr Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
10/22/1991
Mail
:12151 W 32Nd Dr Wheat Ridge Co 80033
Price :
$105,000
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-239-9168
Bedrm
:4 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1961 Pool:
B1dgSF:
2,461 Ac:
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Whitney Steven L/Bernadette M
Parcel :
032427
Site
:3301 Vivian Dr Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
09/08/1997
Mail
:3301 Vivian Dr Wheat Ridge Cc 80033
Price :
$179,900
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
Bath:1.75 TotRm: YS:1962 Pool:
B1dgSF:
1,848 Ac:
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
•
Owner
:Pinnica Nancy Jean
Parcel :
032441
Site
:12121 W 32Nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
09/01/1998
Mail
:12121 W 32Nd Ave Wheat Ridge Cc 80033
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone.
Bedrm:
5 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1961 Pool:
B1dgSF:
1,571 Ac:
*
: MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Osborne Don M
Parcel :
032449
Site
:12081 W 32Nd Dr Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
-05/28/1992
Mail
:12081 W 32Nd Dr Wheat Ridge Cc 80033
Price :
$90,000
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-232-6728
Bedrm:
3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1966 Pool:
B1dgSF:
1,685 Ac:
MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
•
Owner
:Sarten Edith
Parcel :
032460
Site
:3190 Union St Lakewood 80213
Xfered :
09/25/1996
Mail
:3190 Union St Lakewood Cc 80215
Price :
$153,000
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1960 Pool:
B1dgSF:
1.,776 - Ac:
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
:
Owner
:Pearce Ralph C
Parcel :
032469
Site
:3321 Vivian Ct Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
07/11/1977
Mail
:3321 Vivian Ct Wheat Ridge Cc 80033
Price :
$61,300
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-234-9380
Bedrm:
5 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1962 Pool:
BldgSF:
1,866 Ac:
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
:
Owner
:Ankoviak Stanley J/Shayne L
Parcel :
032479
Site
:12141 W 32Nd Dr Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
05/16/1997
Mail
:12141 W 32Nd Dr Wheat Ridge Cc 80033
Price :
$168,000
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-232-5267
Bedrm:
4 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1962 Pool:
B1dgSF:
1,382 Ac:
: MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
:
Owner
:Mcgonagill Kenneth R/Jennifer A
Parcel :
032487
Site
:3363 Vivian Dr Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
01/28/2000
Mail
:3363 Vivian Dr Wheat Ridge Co 80033
Price :
$250,000
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bed=
Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1962 Pool:
B1dgSF:
1,732 Ac:
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Marino Gary J/Charleen
Parcel :
032496
Site
:12025 W 32Nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
05/31/1996
Mail
:12025 W 32Nd Ave Wheat Ridge Cc 80033
Price :
$125,500
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-232-2375
Bedrm:
4 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1957 Pool:
B1dgSF:
1,361 Ac:.38
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
:
Owner
:Nelson Dennis G
Parcel :
032513
Site
:12080 W 32Nd Dr Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
11/18/1991
Mail
:12080 W 32Nd Dr Wheat Ridge Co 80033
Price :
$125,000
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-233-4735
Bedrm:
4 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1961 Pool:
BldgSF:
2,418 Ac:
The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed.
: MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) '
,
Owner
:Scheuneman Eleanor L
Parcel :
032514
Site
:12000 W 32Nd Dr Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
06/25/1986
Mail
:12000 W 32Nd Dr Wheat Ridge Co 80033
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-237-1202
Bedrm:
Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1964 Pool:
B1dgSF:
2,014 Ac:
- MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
owner Owner
:Romig Jean M
Parcel :
032515
Site
:3235 Union St Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
08/23/1996
Mail
:3235 Union St Wheat Ridge Co 80033
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-238-2707
Bedrm:
Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1962 Pool:
B1dgSF:
1,121 Ac:.40
• MetroScan./ Jefferson
(CO) '
Owner
:Castilleja Edward L/Marlyce M
Parcel :
032516
Site -
:12271 W 32Nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
11/10/1997
Mail
:12271 W 32Nd Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80033
Price :
$198,500
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
5 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1969 Pool:
BidgSF:
1,643 Ac:
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) '
-
Owner
:Calhoun Gary R
Parcel :
032518
Site
:3302 Vivian Dr Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
02/04/1999
Mail
:3302 Vivian Dr Wheat Ridge Cc 80033
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-275-0617
Bedrm:
Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1962 Pool:
B1dgSF:
1,767 Ac:
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) '
Owner
:Osborn Marvin L/Helen K
Parcel :
032527
Site
:3281 Vivian Dr Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
06/24/1998
Mail
:3281 Vivian Dr Wheat Ridge Co 80033
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone. :
303-237-7046
Bedrm:
3 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1962 Pool:
B1dgSF:
1,582 Ac:
*
: MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) '
Owner
:Stephens John T
Parcel :
032535
Site
:12060 W 32Nd Dr Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered
Mail
:12060 W 32Nd Dr Wheat Ridge Cc 80033
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-238-1173
Bedrm:
Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1964 Pool:
B1dgSF:
1,351 Ac:
*
: MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Archer Raymond E
Parcel :
032537
Site
:3130 Union St Denver 80215
Xfered :
01/20/1977
Mail
:3130 Union St Denver Co 80215
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-232-5799
Bedrm:
5 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1963 Pool:
BidgSF:
2,335 Ac:
*
: MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Zona Gail Walters Trust
Parcel :
032545
Site
:12356 W 34Th P1 Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
11/01/1999
Mail
:12356 W 34Th 21 Wheat Ridge Cc 80033
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1962 Pool:
B1dgSF:
1,845- Ac:-
MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) '
Owner
:Sasaki Harold K
Parcel :
032550
Site
:12355 W 34Th PI Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
12/28/1972
Mail
:12355 W 34Th Pl Wheat Ridge Co 80033
Price :
$32,000
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1962 Pool:
BldgSF:
1,152 Ac:
MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Wagner Ludwig A
Parcel :
032559
Site
:11860 W 32Nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
03/22/1977
Mail
:11860 W 32Nd Ave Wheat Ridge Cc 80033
Price :
$7,100
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1978 Pool:
B1dgSF:
2,262 Ac:
*
: Met=Scan / Jefferson
(CO) '
owner
:Goto Eliza G
Parcel
:032560
Site
:12336 W 34Th PI Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered
:11/21/1991
Mail
:12336 W 34Th P1 Wheat Ridge Cc 80033
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
:303-238-5938
Bedrm:
4 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1962 Pool:
B1dgSF
:2,660 Ac:
The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed.
*----------------------------:.MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
•
Owner
:Wheeler Michael E
Parcel :
032565
Site
:3080 Union St Lakewood 80215
Xfered :
08/03/1981
Mail
:3080 Union St Lakewood Cc 80215
Price :
$106,000
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-232-0214
Bedrm:
3 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1963 Pool:
B1dgSF:
1,313 Ac:
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
•
-
Owner
:Polivka William G/Elizabeth Millet
Parcel :
032576
Site
:12001 W 32Nd Dr Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
06/05/1997
Mail
:12001 W 32Nd Dr Wheat Ridge Cc 80033
Price :
$252,000
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-205-0367
Bedrm:
4 Bath:2.50 TotRm: Y8:1961 Pool:
B1dgSF:
1,823 Ac:
*
• Met=Scan / Jefferson
(CO)
:
Owner
:Eick Jeffrey Allen/Mary Louise
Parcel :
032582
Site
:12005 W 32Nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
01/06/1999
Mail
:3205 Union St Westminster Cc 80030
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land - -
Phone
Bedrm:
Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1956 Pool:
B1dgSF:
1,656 Ac:.31
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
•
Owner
:Sabatka Adrian A
Parcel :
032584
Site
:12181 W 32Nd Dr Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
08/30/1971
Mail
:12181 W 32Nd Dr Wheat Ridge Co 80033
Price :
$30,000
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-233-8626
Bedrm:
Bath:l.75 TotRm: YB:1962 Pool:
B1dgSF:
2,044 Ac:
*
: MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Emery Jack W
Parcel :
032586
Site
:12161 W 32Nd Dr Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
09/25/1987
Mail
:12161 W 32Nd Dr Wheat Ridge Cc 80033
Price :
$137,000
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-238-9346
Bedrm:
4 Bath:1.75 Tot Rm: YB:1966 Pool:
B1dgSF:
1,717 Ac:
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
:
Owner
:Elliott Sharon J
Parcel :
056987
Site
:*No Site Addre
Xfered :
05/04/1982
Mail
:11681 W Pte ant Ave Golden Cc 80401
Price
Use
:1155 Va t, Re si dent ial
Phone
Bedrm:
the TOtRm: YB: Pool:
B1dgSF:
Ac:
: MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Mayer Richard C
Parcel :
057123
Site
:*No Site Add s*
Xfered :
02/24/1999
Mail
:12243 W 1 Ave Golden Co 80401
Price :
$390,000
Use
:1155 V ant,Residential
Phone
Bedrm:
ath: TotRm: YB: Pool:
B1dgSF:
Ac:.38
*
• Met=Scan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Tavenner Jon C
Parcel :
057132
Site
:*No Site Addr
Xfered :
08/22/1995
Mail
:11835 W 12 Ave Golden Co 80401
Price
Use
:.1155 V nt,Residential
Phone :
303-237-9991
Bedrm:
ath: TotRm: YB: Pool:
B1dgSF:
Ac:
MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Hatchett William E
Parcel :
057311
Site
:*No Site Addres
Xfered :
02/19/1995
Mail
:11771 W Ple ant Ave Golden Cc 80401
Price :
$38,000
Use
:1155 Vac t, Residential
Phone :
303-233-7770
Bedrm:
B h: TotRm: YB: Pool:
B1dgSF:
Ac:
MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Mcdonald James M aron K
Parcel :
057382
Site
:*No Site Add s*
Xfered :
03/07/1997
Mail
:PO Box 64 rederick Cc 80530
Price :
$82,000
Use
:1111 Va nt,Residential.
Phone
Bedrm:
ath: TotRm: YB: Pool:
B1dgSF:
Ac:
*
; MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Perri Angelo
Parcel :
073119
Site
:12022 W 32Nd'Ave Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
10/03/1990
Mail
:12022 W 32Nd Ave Wheat Ridge Cc 80033
Price :
$110,000
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
3 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1969 Pool:
.BldgSF:
1,691 Ac:
The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed.
r
*
-
-
: MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
-
Owne`
,
:Scherer Michael F
Parcel :
030687
Site
:12124 W 31St PI Wheat Ridge 80215
Xfered :
07/07/1978
Mail
:12124 W 31St P1 Wheat Ridge Cc 80215
Price :
$115,000
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-234-0761
Bedrm:
4 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1962 Pool:
B1dgSF:
3,659 Ac:
: MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) .
Owner
:Applestein Frank Louis
Parcel :
030688
Site
:12130 W 31St P1 Wheat Ridge 80215
Xfered :
02/23/1990
Mail
:12130 W 31St P1 Wheat Ridge Cc 80215
Price :
$129,500
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-232-7710
-
YB:1973 Pool:
Bldg--:
2,282 Ac:
*
MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) •
Owner
:Barkey Lois A
Parcel :
030689
Site
:12342 W 32Nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
11/07/1990
Mail
:12342 W 32Nd Ave Wheat Ridge Cc 80033
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-234-0814
Bedrm:
3 Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1961 Pool:
B1dgSF:
1,727 Ac:
/
MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) .
Owner
:Hackett James Michael
Parcel :
030710
Site
:12272 W 32Nd Ave Wheat Ridge 80033
Xfered :
06/29/1990
`
Mail
:12272 W 32Nd Ave Wheat Ridge Co 80033
Price :
$107,000
D
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-232-8243
Bedrm:
5 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1965 Pool:
B1dgSF:
2,053 Ac:
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) '
Owner
:Garcia Edward A
Parcel :
030737
Site
:12083 W 31St PI Lakewood 80215
Xfered :
02/27/1997
Mail
:12083 W 31St P1 Lakewood Co 80215
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-238-3940
Bedrm:
Bath:1.00 TotRm: YB:1962 Pool:
B1dgSF:
1,456 Ac:
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) •
Owner
:Sonstelie Walter E
Parcel :
030783
Site
:12223 W 31St P1 Wheat Ridge 80215
Xfered :
06/30/1977
Mail
:12233-W 31St P1 Lakewood Co 80215
Price :
$70,000
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-237-3058
Bedrm:
Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1962 Pool:
B1dgSF:
1,653 Ac:
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) •
Owner
:Young Donald L
Parcel :
030804
Site
:12064 W 31St 21 Wheat Ridge 80215
Xfered :
11/15/1976
Mail
:12064 W 31St P1 Wheat Ridge Cc 80215
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone :
303-238-2779
Bedrm:
3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1977 Pool:
B1dgSF:
2,267 Ac:
MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO)
Owner
:Shaine Benton
Parcel :
030819
Site
:12063 W 3lSt P1 Wheat Ridge 80215
Xfered :
03/23/1981
Mail
:12063 W 31St P1 Wheat Ridge Co 80215
Price :
$110,000
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
:303-232-0685
Bedrm:
Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1963 Pool:
B1dgSF
:1,535 Ac:
*
• MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) •
Owner
:Moreau Warren A
Parcel
:030862
Site
:3101 Union St Wheat Ridge 80215
Xfered
:06/21/1976
Mail
:3101 Union St Wheat Ridge Co 80215
Price
:$52,800
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
:303-238-6832
Bedrm:
3 Bath:2.25 TotRm: YB:1961 Pool:
B1dgSF
:2,508 Ac:
: MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) '
Owner
:Rcbuck Robert G
Parcel
:030865
Site
:3131 Union St Lakewood 80215
Xfered
Mail
:3131 Union St Lakewood Co 80215
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
Bedrm:
Bath:1.75 TotRm: YB:1963 Pool:
B1dgSF
:1,771 Ac:
*
- MetroScan / Jefferson
(CO) '
Owner
:Barth Harold A
Parcel
:030875
Site
:12273 W 31St P1 Wheat Ridge 80215
Xfered
Mail
:12273 W 3lSt P1 Wheat Ridge Co 80215
Price
Use
:1112 Res,Improved Land
Phone
:303-238-3356
Bedrm
:3 Bath:2.50 TotRm: YB:1962 Pool
: B1dgSF
:2,109 Ac:
Q
The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guar
anteed.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT on April 26, 2001, at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of
the Municipal Building at 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested
citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. The following
petitions shall be heard:
Case No. TUP-01-01: An application filed by Walmart for a 30-day temporary use
permit for the purpose of conducting an outdoor garden sale at the property located at
3600 Youngfield Street and zoned Planned Commercial Development (PCD).
Case No. WA-01-01: An application filed by Shayne Ankoviak for approval of a 12 foot
side yard setback variance from the required 15 foot side yard setback resulting in a
proposed 3 foot side yard setback for the purpose of constructing a garage addition for
property zoned Residential-One (R-1) and located at 12141 West 32nd Drive.
Case No. WA-01-04: An application filed by Tom & Debra Stano for approval of a 22
foot front yard setback variance from the required 30 foot front yard setback resulting in a
proposed 8 foot front yard setback and a 1 foot side yard setback variance from the
required 5 foot minimum side yard setback and required 15 foot combined side yard
setback resulting in a proposed 4 foot side yard setback and 14 foot combined side yard
setback for the purpose of constructing a detached garage for property located at 6295
West 42nd Avenue and zoned Residential-Two (R-2).
Case No. WA-01-05: An application filed by Paul Mintken for approval of a 12 foot
front yard setback variance from the required 30 foot front yard setback resulting in a
proposed 18 foot front yard setback for the purpose of constructing a garage addition for
property located at 3071 Union Street and zoned Residential-One (R-1).
Kathy Field, Senior Secretary
ATTEST:
Wanda Sang, City Clerk
To be Published: Wheat Ridge Transcript
Date: April 6, 2001
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
Notice is hereby given that the Public Hearing to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT on February 22, 2001 in the City Council Chambers of the
Municipal Building at 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado, has been CANCELED.
Kathy Field, Senior Secretary
C:\Kathy\BOA\PUBHBGS\010222.wpd
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT on February 22, 2001 in the City Council Chambers of the
Municipal Building at 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested citizens
are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. The following petition
shall be heard:
Case No. WA-01-01: An application filed by Shayne Ankoviak for approval of a 12 foot
side yard setback variance from the required 15 foot side yard setback for the purpose of
constructing an attached garage addition for property zoned Residential-One (R-1) and
located at 12141 West 32nd Drive.
Kathy Field, Senior Secretary
ATTEST:
Wanda Sang, City Clerk
To be Published: Wheat Ridge Transcript
Date: February 2, 2001
C:\Ka1hy\B0A\PUBHRGS\010222.wpd
TAB VAMOVI / ;;;6 Marshall St.
AM V MP Arvada CO 80002.3802
PhOne: 3034238200
Fax: 303423.6213
800-292-7968
FAX TRANSMISSION
This One DATE:
pates Includin8
If them is a problem with the transmission of this Fax, please call 303-423-620D.
TO: 7k-A-V(E C.
FAX: 363~A3s--aIks7
CpM[VII~iTS:
j)(0 t
e-- ~ ( Yet 04~~ r-
c.J(T71 ra
COMPANY: C (T-Y C-) F W tf&~T- R t 0 ri -
r/
~2 -
I 'd OHS ON JNIM)VdONVW AVW dIn03iSVM Wd0oo MI U
83d_..
~lr/1.c1 d'~l~ ms's SKf(t(~ 4 ~ ~tfr~"
~ r WASnQU1P-
AfAYMM.
FAX TRANSMISSION
Pages lnclWft This One
5406 Marihall St.
Arvada CO 60002-3802
Phone: 303-4236200
Fax: 303.423.6213
800-292.7966
DATE: u- r 5 ^ d r
If there is a problem with the transmission of this Fax, please call 303.423-6200.
To: ~U t S C N IL COMPANY: C r Y"Y y F LV H i' ~i °G
FAx: 303 - a 3 s- a.,P-s7
cods:
fi_.c9 Iri c, 11)
IW 9-
14 f44C t
IS //UA
M7`&JT-
?D GE-f-
mJ/
X mkt r-(0 tj P) ~7-krz. k 4
6
O /Z
R
/i? 4 C If A FlL~/ IAJ G
! Cl~r tf3Fv~y uf7~v~So
'd b90 ON 9NI LOVE HVA AVA dIn03iSVM NdU:s 1002. '83j..
7500 West 29th Avenue The City of
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215 Wheat
Telephone 303/235-2846 Ridge
FAX 3031235-2857
February 7, 2001
Shayne Ankoviak
12141 W. 32 Dr.
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Dear Mr. Ankoviak:
RE: Case No. WA-01-01
Your request for approval of a 12 foot side yard setback variance from the required 15 foot side yard
setback for the purpose of constructing an attached garage addition for property zoned Residential-
One (R-1) and located at 12141 West 32 ❑ Drive has been rescheduled for public hearing by Board of
Adjustment at 7:30 p.m. on March 22, 2001.
As a reminder, public notice fees must be paid to the City in the amount of $335.75. Payment must
be made no later than February 23, 2001.
Please feel free to contact me at 303-235-2846 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
2
Kathy Field
Planning Secretary
cc: WA-01-01 (case file)
CAKathy'00ATORRESP1waO 10192. wpd
7500 West 29th Avenue The City of
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215 Wheat
Telephone 303/235-2846 Ridge
FAX 303/235-2857
January 30, 2001
Shayne Ankoviak
12141 W. 32nd Dr.
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Dear Mr. Ankoviak:
RE: Case No. WA-01-01
Your request for approval of a 12 foot side yard setback variance from the required 15 foot side yard
setback for the purpose of constructing an attached garage addition for property zoned Residential-
One (R-1) and located at 12141 W. 32nd Dr. is scheduled for public hearing by Board of Adjustment
at 7:30 p.m. on February 22, 2001.
Based on the neighborhood notification mailing (totaling 91 letters), additional public notice fees in
the amount of $335.75 must be paid to the City per the City's fee schedule. Payment must be made
no later than February 5, 2001.
Please feel free to contact me at 303-235-2846 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Kathy Field
Planning Secretary
Enclosures: fee schedule
cc: WA-01-01 (case file)
Q\Kathy\B0A\C0RRESP\wa0101.wpd
0
N
m
cu
m
y1
r
0 19
1
.r \
O Ul
0
0
G7
CL
O
Q
Q
0
O
0
U
}
F -
z
U
N z
O
N
w
w
IL
It LL
10 w
N ti
Z
LL. Q
W
Q
z0
O N
F-
ti.
U N
W
w N
It =
a
m
0
N
w
W
z4
W
a
h
W
P4 >4
W
a
W
P4
W
h
a
~
4J
o
w
ci
C
Q
q
A
°m
U
5
~
O
[a
s
m
m
~
rn
Q
c
a
d
~
W
3
O H
W
a W
i
O
C
_a
U
rn W
m m
=
F
rn N
« m
`0 65 j
m N
C` E
C-3) a x
C5, p
m
O H
U W
O
m H
m N
m a
z
x
0
O
M
M J
~O N
°m0Lm
N c
OU W o
Z w v
C,4 a r4
MU h
A o
H U
~ P4 p c
c 0
0
m rn
m «
m
m
N
m w
m m H
0 «
L
3 `o
Nm c`o
m m
2
N ETp
Qa,p G G
m a
~
p
.0 'O V S q J~ C
J G C p
m
'J m
N
C q N
00 -
U-
C
m
m
a
G
9
.
m
V
0 '
$
N
a
5
N
N L
m
C
d N •N m q N
« O
-
m
m C L V .0
« La
N
T E
a E
0 m
? L
y C
NN oc
8 ID 3 c m
U
C
t «
m
J
q >i
(al
.
N.
U
a T
m
c
m
g 0 0 m
I
o
$
E
t
:
- c
t c
a .
m m
6
° a
m
n o m m` _ a
N
~
m C
~
I
°
O
1 .
m m
.
c .
m
q>> E m N
~
I m q
3 m
3 °m' c H m m
@ m j
m L c a m ai v
IaN~N
NO
Nm TNR
m a a a
9 0
$ o
p
a` m v c N a
cc 0
my 0
v 'm `0E
m> q
Q
m N
_
m m O m a 0 T
I
I N t- a
m
'
O
z
n°
c m g
gC
L
.
0 .
m
U
~•N~
°
T
~L .~ON
v m
I N
C
a S c
m ma:o
Eg
g@'>
>wm -~'g-
I o ro O
W OH
m
~ N z t a a m
E I
m~
-IH
`
Ea
I
c'S
.
o.rnLrn
E
rn
aE E~
- -
mmc
N ~r
2
o
I L t d
z
« N Z
0 M
0 0 0 N E
' U 0
0
N
0 9 0
m 0` N N N a
N
m
i s 3
I
-1 0
O
n
c 'i3 S
c= v x m
H a
N E m
C
O Q •m m 3° m o
-m•- _ 0
0«
I T 0«
Q W
C
m
0
I m
C
~
m N
Ul W O
°
m N«
S 0 tll C G m> a
U
O
8
~n
W0
m
m
L O O
m 0 0 m
F O m U
5 N
I_
h O
U
m
m>
0-, > 3 @ o
I g N m
0 W
N
Q ° tll
Q O1 °f L O. m O 0
- m
m m
2
-
O O
=
,2
m
0
i
N
N m
c
F N 3
a
s m c
•
a m W
7
H
c
a
°
(W7
_
o
~
\ - m W
H W ry'
Y
.
_
O i? cm °
a m c y
c
O m c$ a m q
r'
W
El
a
°
~ m
a
~ 'm m m °
@> o
m
-
I C
9 U
N
o
m m p1
8 g m
m m
a q "
t n
3 m
m V
m « O.
n
Q C m
m E a
C U N
0 N
N 0
E 3mc
O o T o
c ffi m
Vin. `O
a o
m ami
m
'm n c v
m m m
Z~
W N N 0
{wjj ~ m m
j as
W m
CC
LL ~ X
Q N
z '0 m
Q
m
Z
cc = m
o q
N ~
m E Em
m
G $ n um
0`0 3w
L° o M Z
m 0 m
m Z
n «
rn m
W ~
3,
U
1
_
A
C
O N
a L
N
zW
~
f]
0
a
O 0
'
c
t
T
a
E
E
E
~
L ~
S_
W
z
d
-As
bps
0
2
m
z E w
O 0 i
S
yaN7 y~ d G~
(L) j2
0 m W
N
N U E 4
C
C A
'o
o p
m Ga
Fca
v
N
U
C
c
N
c
F
G
'O
w
W
w
0
Q
Q
N
O
M
0
Z
a
n
V7
co
co
,S
o
O
m
L3;
°O
Q
W
L
4
H
«
o
n
~
3
G
U
®
co
A
Pa
•
o
Fi
uJ
d
ca
O
rNv
C
a
s.~
sr
°
k
~
2
I
- A o
ow Z
a y \
CO N
m
0
>J
h~
W
J
Q.
U
i
i
i
19
E
1a '
/ eV
sl.
P
C<N
°
m m
m
v
n° m
A I
I
t t 1
~Z
p
~ m w
O
.O
\
m
E
m °c
m
Ski
O
~p
c U'
=
o
°
i
c
c
w
H
a_
S m w
o
sv
rn°=
ma g
J
~
0
V
° J
a
11
° m
C
1
14
I $
.
N
S E
c
m
o
c
O
0
m
q
a E
=
N
L
o a
Y °m
m
E
t
m
44
W
m
c E
-
Y c
e
E c
N
E
tI
r1
o u
° a m
O
°
y
E m...~ i3$
O
C'I
i
\ `0.V
`
=
C
m m;i'
~
a
~
4]
V
\L
=
L
O~ r
= '
2
Q ,
m
r tS
m e
° F s
H
1
m m
L u a fr %j L
H
Q
+
w
u n
° Ll
m o a
J
=
PQ
3.
m
Y T
C ~
n
m - ryL'
- c o-- ~ CQ
o
u
r-I
o
u c
~
m m mm C:r
z
Q
p'
~
a
mm
5®E ~
F
O
H
.
O
N
I
~
a
r
p
°
n
,.t
nm
sL4
!
^
.
M
O
m
r.
m
m o
m_E
11. YItIII!{f/!q
m e °m
f
,I
Z
\
6
a
z
E°
ee a
t
° r4`
V]
C7
3
c
c
~y
~r O
r
¢
U
m- 6
J
z m
y Oi nB
0
4J
N-
U
m
~C
:
n
0
r-I
FC
6
I W
u E
T m
w
`i
U O
e
p
LR a G7J.--!
s-f
y U
m~
>
m
fb, ~
L m-
y
1
U LL
~ IL
~
03
O G ~ J
v
f~
a
l4r
u`S
N
n
6 ui
mQ
W U
LL
Ow
i0
7
_v ~ `tea Say."
CASE LOG
Case No.: A0101 Quarter Section Map No.: NE29 _
App: Last Name:
nkoviak
Related Cases:
App: First Name:
ha ne -
Case History:
12 ft. side yard setback
ariance from the required
Owner: Last Name:
3
nkoviak
15 ft. side yard setback for
-
Owner: First Name:
_
tan & Sha ne _
he purpose of
consttuctiog.a-garage------!
App Address:
12141 W. 32nd Dr.
Review Body:
BOA -2122/01
City, State Zip:
_ heat Ridge CO 80033
APN:
39 291-10-022
App: Phone:
303-232-5267
s
Owner Address:
ame 1
2nd Review Body:
_
City/State/Zip:
ame
2nd Review Date:
Owner Phone:.
ame
Decision-making Body:
BOA i
Project Address:
12141 1
O
-
Approval/Denial Date:
Street Name:
est 32nd Drive
3
City/State, Zip:
heat_Ridge, CO 80033
Reso/Ordinance No.:
Case Disposition:
Conditions of Approval:
Project Planner: Crane
File Location: dive
Notes:
Follow-Up: -~W
9000 OF AV~QsTn
~J ~ t
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
08!15/01 1-J1 P11 CD
RICHARD HILL
RECEIPT NO.T027110 AMOUNT
FMSD RICHARD HILL/RECORD 55.00
District: III
Date Received: 112312001
Pre-App Date:
PAYMENT RECEIVED AMOUNT
CK 721 55.00
TOTAL JJ.00