Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
WA-98-21
1~ ? W z L.Li N 00 O N v e N W \ T s x O O M £o Z ` ~ F d g 4 p m y N D7 0 C .~A Z C m t'u c o m .2 ~ a @ o cc A a _ O ow N y cUa `%s7d e Lz? O i6 p " a v 0 o .a b t ~ 0. J a 1 OS~ OZ ZOI Z01 x -"ZT- 0 T Z ~S c3 a ~ V it m N - J T ~ m ,u\ Z 0 >.N Z W O W ~ CO > N U N cc EU F1 ~ n m MQ , If C \ Z roy o 63 ~ nJ 7 J O U U C w O E W y N a U m m F, o O U W o a Z 0 Q m Q ~ O O N. o m .z .N Z aa« W a'J v m c o. m 0 3 H 0 m T I^L U_ Z L N (mJ C m o E m 0 0 o Q c E m E `O m _ O a E m ; m Z m « H= C6 c « -"E m m C 0 0 m c o. U 22 E ~ = m m m m ~ t « •J- v~ m $ c aU ma C aH O y o€ y m U O 6a .N m n J m tC p N y~ a m _ ~m m Z2 C m p E V _ c t 6y 3 rnm a O p 40 v m° m `a _ v o mom `m ~ m ~ aE N C O. ~ m`c y9 G <a m` w0 p o m U O V Za O- T J'Tm m N U m C X N m `m a`p 2~ m aTCt c m a'- d..oE C apy 0 aqa° p90 n C m«°' 'mOT O 8 m Ttad O N N dm 050- mYT H! c A Em°E c m E_mv oES V~Tc am L C c m R o =>^E E o N EoEE 0 m U O ~m ~ O m p c E E9 c E ' - 02C2 2 m om m ~ 0 00 ZL « a m FFF N00 Uq-oL R ~<aa~im r«A a m _p ~3mE. 3 c c°" m p H wm$ 5 C N m F~°qm `=v mLm. oz W Q 0 Co W Co O M y Z m T U y O d a Ca - m¢ O i=U 7500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215 Wheat Telephone 303/ 237-6944 Ridge FAX 303/234-5924 July 27, 1998 Mr. Gene Hartley 6710 West 281h Avenue Wheat Ridge, Co 80033 RE: WA-98-21: Request for a 10' side yard setback to the 15' requirement for the purpose of a garage Dear Mr. Hartley: Please be advised that at its meeting of July 23, 1998, the Board of Adjustment APPROVED your request for aside yard setback with amendments. The approval allows a 5' variance to the 15' side yard setback in lieu of your requested 10'. Attached is a copy of the Certificate of Resolution stating the Board's decision which became effective the date of the meeting, July 23,1998. Should you decide to appeal the decision of the Board, you will need to notify the Jefferson County district court in writing within 30 days of the Board's decision. Please feel free to contact me at 235-2846 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Barbara Delgadillo Planning and Development Secretary /bd cc: Landmark 794 East Hampden Cr. Denver, CO 80237 WA-98-21 C 1Bwbua\BOA\CORRESP\wa982I I andmark.wpd CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTION I, Ann Lazzeri, Secretary to the City of Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment, do hereby certify that the following Resolution was duly adopted in the City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, on the 23rd day of July, 1998. CASE NO: WA-98-21 APPLICANT'S NAME: Contractor: Landmark, 794 East Hampden Circle, Denver Owner: Gene Hartley, 6710 W. 28th Avenue, Wheat Ridge LOCATION: 6710 West 28th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO Upon a motion by Board Member ABBOTT, seconded by Board Member ECHELMEYER, the following resolution was stated: WHEREAS, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and WHEREAS, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-98-21 is an appeal to this Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and WHEREAS, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law and there were no protests registered against it; and WHEREAS, the relief applied for may be granted without detriment to the public welfare and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-98-21 be, and hereby is, approved. TYPE OF VARIANCE: Request for approval of a 5-foot side yard setback variance to the 15- foot side yard setback requirements to allow construction of a detached two-car garage. FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: There are other structures in the immediate neighborhood which have nonconforming setbacks of this nature. 2. The proposed garage would be located on the southwest comer of the property approximately 73 feet from West 28th Avenue. Case No. WA-98-21/Board of Adjustment Resolution Page two (2) 3. The proposed location of this structure would allow for adequate separation between the adjacent habitable structure, and therefore would not impair the adequate supply of light or air, or increase the danger of fire. 4. Currently accepted community standards would expect a two-car garage in a dwelling of this type. Alternative locations would seem impractical and significantly detrimental to the livability of the primary structure and its rear-yard area. VOTE: Yes: Abbott, Echelmeyer, Howard, Mauro and Thiessen No: Hovland Absent: 7unker and Walker DISPOSITION: Request for approval of a 5-foot side yard setback variance to the 15-foot side yard setback requirements to allow construction of a detached two-car garage was approved. ADOPTED and made effective this 23rd day of July, 1998. A MAfJJR0r,V Chairman Ann Lazzeri, Secretai of Adjustment Board of Adjustment For the Following Reasons: 1. There are other development alternatives on the site which would allow compliance with the ordinance. _ 2. Approval of.this request would alter the essential character of the locality as no structure of this design, layout on the lot, or visual effect upon the neighborhood or the-primary structure itself, occur within the vicinity. 3. There are no demonstrable hardships. Board Member ECHELMEYER stated that he would vote in favor of the motion for _ denial because he felt that more effort could be spent in redesigning the structure to meet code requirements. Board Member THIESSEN stated that she is not in favor of granting a variance of this percentage and that is not visually appealing to the neighborhood. The motion carried by a vote of 6-0 with Board Members WALKER and JUNKER absent. Chair MAURO advised the applicant that his request had been denied. B. Case No. No. WA-98-21: . An application by Landmark for approval of a 10-foot side yard setback to the 15-foot side yard setback requirement to construct a detached garage. Said property is zoned R-1 and located at 6710 West 28th Avenue. This case was presented by Sean McCartney. He reviewed the staff report and presented slides and overhead projections of the subject property. He entered all pertinent documents into the record and advised that there was jurisdiction for the Board to hear the case. He stated staffs conclusion that, although approval of the request would not be detrimental to the public's welfare or increase fire danger between adjacent structures, there were development alternatives within the site which would allow for a garage to be constructed which would comply with development regulations established in the Residential-One zone district. He concluded the presentation by stating that staff recommended denial of the request based on criteria used for evaluation of a variance request. Following questions concerning clarification of setback requirements and location of the proposed garage, the applicant appeared before the Board. Board of Adjustment Pa.-e 4 07/23/98 Lester E. (Gene) Hartley .6710 West 28th Avenue Mr. Hartley was sworn in by Chair MAURO. He stated that, since an attached garage _ would be cost prohibitive, he planned to build a detached garage. He felt that his proposed locationwould look best and would be more serviceable. He explained that moving the garage back would entail additional expense for fill to make land level . Board Member ABBOTT asked for clarification on the need for fill. Mr. Hartley replied that the yard slopes considerably behind the present driveway and if he were to move the proposed garage back another ten feet, it would require considerable fill in order to make the ground level with the rest of the property. Upon a motion by Board Member ABBOTT and a second by Board Member ECHELMEYER, the following Resolution was stated: . Whereas, the applicant was denied permission by an Administrative Officer; and Whereas, Board of Adjustment Application, Case No. WA-98-21, is an appeal to this Board from the decision of an Administrative Officer: and Whereas, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law and there were no protests registered against it; and Whereas, the relief applied for may be granted without detriment to the public welfare and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing the city of Wheat Ridge. Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved that Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA- 98-21 be and hereby is APPROVED. Type of Variance: Request for approval of a 10-foot side yard setback variance to the 15-foot side yard setback requirements to allow construction of a detached two-car garage. For the following reasons: 1. There are other structures in the immediate neighborhood which have nonconforming setbacks of this nature. 2 The proposed garage would be located on the southwest corner of the property approximately 73 feet from West 28th Avenue. Board of Adjustment Page 5 07/23/98 3. The proposed location of this structure would allow for adequate separation between the adjacent habitable structure and therefore would not impair the adequate supply of light or air, nor increase the danger of fire. 4. - Currently accepted community standards would expect a two-car garage in a _ dwelling of this type. 5.. Alternative locations would seem impractical and significantly detrimental to the livability of the primary structure and its rear-yard area. Board Member THIESSEN stated that she would vote against the motion because, while she understood the owner's plight, she felt the situation presented more of an _ inconvenience than a hardship to the applicant. She indicated that she would vote for something less than the two-thirds setback variance requested. Board Member ECHELMEYER commented that the request concerns the back corner of a piece of property that has normally bordered horse property and the neighbor to the west has a very large truck garden. He also stated that he believed the necessity of filling in the slope would present a hardship to the applicant. Board Member HOVLAND expressed his agreement with Board Member THIESSEN and stated that economic cost is not one of the criteria used in evaluating a variance. He felt there were other alternatives available to the applicant. Board Member HOWARD agreed with Board Members HOVLAND and THIESSEN and felt that some compromise was in order. Board Member ABBOTT asked the applicant if he would consider a 5-foot variance rather than a 10-foot variance. Gene Hartley Mr. Hartley returned to the podium and agreed to accept 5-foot variance. He expressed frustration with the fact that there are other nonconforming situations in the City of Wheat Ridge. Board Member ECHELMEYER assured Mr. Hartley that the Board was not trying to make things difficult for him, but rather.was attempting to keep the neighborhood within the confines of the City of Wheat Ridge rules and regulations. Board Member ABBOTT offered an amendment to his motion to change the variance from a 10-foot to a 5-foot side yard variance. This amendment was acceptable to Board Member ECHELMEYER. Board of Adjustment Page 6 07/23/98 The motion carried by a vote of 5-1, with Board Member HOVLAND voting no and Board Members WALKER and JUNKER absent. Chair MAURO advised the applicant that the variance was granted. _ C.:, _ Case No. WA-98-22: An application by Linda Christensen for approval of a 10-foot side yard setback variance to the 15-foot setback requirement and a 15-foot front yard _ setback variance to the 30-foot front yard setback requirement to allow a private storage shed: Said property is zoned R-2 and located at 2790 Vance Street. This case was continued to the August 27, 1998 Board of Adjustment meeting due to improper posting and publication of the application. D. Case No. WA-98-23: An application by Sandra Hutchcroft for approval of a 9.5-foot yard setback to the 15-yard setback requirement for the purpose of constructing a storage shed. Said property is zoned R-1 and located at 3263 Taft Court. This case was presented by Sean McCartney. He reviewed the staff report, entered all pertinent documents into the record and advised that there was jurisdiction for the Board to hear the case. He presented an aerial view of the property and stated staff's conclusion that, although the property was found to be a pie-shaped lot and approval of the request should not be detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare, staff believed there were other development alternatives on the site which would comply with the development regulations established for the R-1 zone district. He concluded the presentation by stating that staff recommended denial based on criteria used for evaluation of a variance request. The applicant appeared before the Board. Sandra Hutchcroft 3263 Taft Court Ms. Hutchcroft was sworn in by Chair MAURO. Ms. Hutchcroft submitted copies of a document containing her comments which she felt supported a hardship in this case. A copy of this document was entered into the record as "Exhibit A". She stated that their home has four levels including a finished basement used as an office area. The only storage space left is the crawl space which is not ideal because of dirt and dampness and difficulty associated with crawling in and out of the area. Her plan called for a 10 x 20 foot storage addition to the house, bricked to match the existing structure, and she felt the addition would increase the value of the property and would not be degrading to the neighborhood. Location of trees on the property substantially reduced available space for a storage shed. Based on the 13.5-foot Board of Adjustment Page 7 07/23/98 PUBLIC HEARING SPEAKERS' LIST CASE NO% WA-98-21 DATE: July 23, 1998 REQUEST: An application by Landmark for approval of a five-foot side yard setback to the fifteen-foot side yard setback requirement to construct a detached garage. Said property is zoned R-1 and located at 6710 West 28th Avenue. (please print) S esker Nam Address/Phone In Favor Opposed ~~7~~ CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO: Board of Adjustment DATE OF MEETING: July 23, 1998 DATE PREPARED: July 14, 1998 CASE NO. & NAME: WA-98-2U Landmark CASE MANAGER: Sean McCartney ACTION REQUESTED: Request for approval of a 10' side yard setback variance to the 15' side yard setback requirement to allow the construction of a detached garage. LOCATION OF REQUEST: 6710 West 28'' Avenue NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT: NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER: Landmark 794 East Hampden Cr Denver, CO 80237 Gene Hartley 6710 West 28`x' Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 APPROXIMATE AREA: PRESENT ZONING: PRESENT LAND USE: SURROUNDING ZONING: SURROUNDING LAND USE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE AREA: 11,200 square feet Residential-One Single-family N:, S:, E: and W: Residential-One N:, S:, E: and W: Single-family residential Low Density Residential DATE PUBLISHED: DATE POSTED: DATED LEGAL NOTICES SENT: ENTER INTO RECORD: (X) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (X) ZONING ORDINANCE O SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OTHER July 3, 1998 July 9, 1998 June 30, 1998 (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIAL O SLIDES (X) EXHIBITS JURISDICTION: The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. L REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of 10' side yard setback variance to the 15' side yard setback requirement to allow for the construction of a 24'X 24' detached garage. Approval of this request will allow for the placement of a detached garage 5' from the west side property line. Currently, there is an existing single-car attached garage located on the west side of the house. The applicant has stated that they are planning to convert the existing single-car garage into livable space, and therefore would like to construct a new two-car garage. The applicant has proposed placing the garage 5' from the western property line to take advantage of an existing dirt driveway that runs the entire length of the property. If the variance is approved, staff would require a concrete driveway from West 28s' Avenue to the front of the garage. Pursuant to Section 26-10 (F) of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, a detached garage in the Residential- One zone district must retain a 15' side yard and 5' rear yard setback from the side and rear lot lines. In this case, the applicant can comply with the 5' rear yard setback requirement. Staff did suggest that a garage structure may be built, within 3' of the existing residence, on the west side of the property. A 24' wide detached garage, with a minimum separation of 3' from the existing , residence (with fire rated walls), would retain an I P setback from the west property line, and therefore require a lesser variance request. In addition, the applicant could attach a 23' garage to the west side of the structure and still comply with the 15` side yard setback requirement. To date, staff has not received any formal complaint regarding this request n SITE PLAN The property in question is square, measuring 109.5'X 102.3', located in a predominately flat area of Wheat Ridge. The property currently has a 1,938 square foot single-family residence with a single-car attached garage. The driveway for the garage allows for a side load access on the west side of the property. The existing driveway that extends the length of the property was created to allow for access to the property to the south of the applicant's property. Last December, the applicant purchased the west 16'X 102.3' from the owner of Lot 2 of the Henderson Subdivision Amended. The acquisition of land is represented on the attached Improvement Location Certificate. III VARIANCE CRITERIA Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a variance request: 1. Can the property in question yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located? Yes. If denied, the property may continue to be used as a single-family residential dwelling. The applicant does have the option to attach a 23' wide structure to the west side of the existing structure and still comply with the required side yard setback. 2. Is the plight of the owner due to unique circumstances? No. There aren't any unique circumstances attributed to this request. 3. If the variation were granted, would it alter the essential character of the locality? No. There are other structures in the immediate neighborhood which have non-conforming setbacks. However, the other structures were probably constructed prior to incorporation of the City of Wheat Ridge. 4. Would the particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved result in a particular hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out? No. This property is a 109.5'X 102.3' square lot located in a predominantly flat area of Wheat Ridge. Neither topography nor lot shape result in a particular hardship. 5. Would the conditions upon which the petition for a variation is based be applicable, generally, to the other property within the same zoning classification? Yes. All applications are reviewed on a case-by-case basis thereby changing the outcome for each request. 6. Is the purpose of the variation based exclusively upon a desire to make money out of the property No. The sole purpose of the request is to allow for additional enclosed parking. Has the alleged difficulty or hardship been created by any person presently having an interest in the property? Yes. The applicant, who has interest in the property, has created a self-imposed hardship. There are other development alternatives that exist on the property. 8. Would the granting of the variations be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located? No. If the request is approved, the proposed garage would be located on the southwest corner of the property approximately 73' from West 28t' Avenue. Therefore, the location of the proposed structure would not be detrimental to the public's health safety and welfare, nor would it be injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood. 9. Would the proposed variation impair the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion in the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. No. As previously stated, the proposed location of this structure would allow for adequate separation between any adjacent habitable structures and. therefore would not impair the adequate supply of light and air nor increase the danger of fire. Also, because the applicant intends on utilizing an existing driveway access, there should not be an increase in traffic congestion in the public streets. 10. If it is found in criteria 8 and 9 above that granting of the variation would not be detrimental or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood, and it is also found that public health and safety, public facilities and surrounding property values would not be diminished or impaired, then would the granting of the variance result in a benefit or contribution to the neighborhood or the community as distinguished from an individual benefit on the part of the applicant, or would granting of the variance result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities? No. The proposed request is purely for individual benefit and will not benefit the community or neighborhood. VI. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION Staff concludes that although approval of this request will not be detrimental on the public's welfare nor increase the danger of fire between any adjacent structures, there are development alternatives within the site that would allow for a proposed garage to comply with the development regulations established in the Residential-One zone district. Based on the criteria used for evaluation, a recommendation of DENIAL is given. If the request is approved, a concrete driveway, extending from West 28`h Avenue to the proposed garage, is required. VII. RECOMMENDED MOTIONS Option A: "I move that Case No. WA-98-20, a request for approval of a 10' side yard setback variance to the 15' side yard setback requirement to allow the construction of a detached garage on a property zoned Residential-One and located at 6710 West 28`h Avenue, be APPROVED for the following reasons: 1. Approval of this request should not alter the essential character of the locality. 2. The location of the structure should not impair the adequate supply of light and air to the adjacent properties nor increase the danger of fire." Option B: "I move that Case No. WA-98-20, a request for approval of a 10' side yard setback variance to the 15' side yard setback requirement to allow the construction of a detached garage on a property zoned Residential-One and located at 6710 West 28`h Avenue, be DENIED for the following reasons: 1. There are other development alternatives on the site that would comply with the development regulations established in the Residential-One zone district. 2. There are no unique circumstances or hardship." J I I I I I I I I L I IA I Y u J $ H' LER 1 . s y O 'P $ w 30TH Ave e a ~ 5 n n !D H SPARKS N e s 6 ~ ~ 7 9 M . . W 26TH AVE Is W 31ST AVE e a a 5 iz! a FIRST SPANISH ASSEMBLY OF GOD SUB y 3 $61 N y CA~ WZ- 5 OFFI0 AL ZONING M A P -ZONE DISTRICT BOUNDRY - PARCEL/LOT BOUNDRY WiHEAT I DeE (DESIGNATES OWNERSHIP) ' ` CITY LIMIT LINE COLORADO WATER FEATURE • DENOTES MULTIPLE ADDRE55E5 MAP ADOPTED: June 15, 1994 Last Revision: January 9, 1995 i L SX 25 o m lao av ero x» SCALE I'=400 DB'ARTMaC OF FLAWI* " DEVB.LR EW - 235-2852 "curer uascripuon Provided by Customer Lot 4 Mooraiieam Subdivision and the West 18' of the East 448' of-fha North 112 of Lot 2, Block 8, Henderson Subdivision Amended, and the South 10' of the Vied Street Adjacent to the North Line of the West'* of the East 148' of Lot 2, Block 8 Henderson 3i bdivfitfon Amended LOT 2 LOT 4 i CONCRETE , ih lV COLUMBINE SURVEYING, INC. 7573 S. Ames Way Littleton, CO 80128 (303) 972-8000 185 PIN M N O N TH 1 scale r IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that this improvement location certificate was prepared for LANDMARK GARAGES that it is not a land survey plat or improvement survey plat, and that it is not to be relied upon for the establishment of fence, building, or other future improvement lines. WEST 28TH AVENUE 109.5' --------------f o L"L4 Stti25!0' i M _ #6710 1 STORY 1`11 BRICK COVERED CONCRETE I further certify that the improvements on the above described parcel, except utility connections, are entirely within the boundaries of the. parcel, except as shown, that there-are no encroachments upon the described premises by improvements on any adjoining premises, except as indicated, and that there is no apparent evidence or sign of any easement crossing or burdening any part of said parcel, except as noted. 11nn - n---. - . a~ PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE'S DEED (Testate Estate) THIS DEED is made by Lester E. Hartley personal representative of the Estate of Wilma V. Moore deceased, Grantor, to Lester E. Hartley and Donna L. Hartley, in joint tenancy, Grantees, whose legal address is 2558 Eaton, Edgewater, CO 80214 of the County of Jefferson and State of Colorado. WHEREAS, the Last Will and Testament of the above named decedent was made and executed in the lifetime of the decedent, and is dated January 21, 1997, which Will was duly admitted to (ieaaay (informal) probate on August 25, 1997 , by the District' Court in and for the County of Jefferson and State of Colorado, Probate No. 97 PR 972. WHEREAS, Grantor was duly appointed Personal Representative of said estate on August 25, z a 8W < ca H 1997, and is now qualified and acting in said capacity. NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the power conferred upon Grantor by the Colorado Probate Code, Grantor :foes hereby sell, convey, assign, transfer, and set over unto said Grantee (for and in considerationof Ten Dollars and other good and valuable consideration ($10.00) Dollars)" "the following described real property situate in the County of Jefferson, State of Colorado: Lot 4 Moore-Ream Subdivision and the West 16' of the East 148' of the North 112 of Lot 2, Block 8, Henderson Subdivision Amended, and the South 10' of the Vacated Street Adjacent to the North Line of the West 16' of the East 148' of Lot 2, Block 8, Henderson Subdivision Amended also known by street and number as: 6710 W. 28th Ave., Denver, CO 50214 assessor's schedule or parcel number. With all appurtenances, subject to covenants, easements and restrictions of record, and general property taxes for the year 1997 and subject to easements and restrictions of record. As used herein, the singular includes the plural and the plural the singular. Executed ~L C. / / .1997. • Lester E. Hartley Personal Representative of the ale of Wilma V. Moore, Deceased. STATE OF COLORADO ) ss: COUNTY OF JEFFERSON ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this / day of 1 ! ~ ? 997 b•: Lester E. Hartley as Personal Representatives of the Estate of Wilma V. Moore, Deceased. WITNESS my hand and official seal. MY ~.•jOUBL\C :4 rtl~c c %Cr1~ c cJ o Nofary Public OF [OlOa11101` MR CQVAIS r OFM VA 17, gum CONFORMS TO CPC 46, Rev. 1-%, Pex ,N,N srratstxr~me's D® (Testate) °F WHEgTP LAND "uSE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION °f WHEgT~ a ~ a Planning and Development Department m 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 °pt oRno° Phone (303) 235-2846 cot oRro° (Please print or type all information) / Applicant G>~NDIVji4~K Address 7? 9 Y E "4MPiJeIU C4 Phone 7/- O/ City 1D,GA/v~~ Co go Z37 Owner E7ENE f ~ 2T~e~ Address 6710 cy 2$ k` AV z Phone Zak- H 6 3 City w Ff EA-r!R t r> 4- E L=0 Location of request (address) 6-110 in7 - 'L Fs t- /4-v E Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions li ste d below which pertain to your request.) ❑ Change of zone or zone conditions Variance / Waiver ❑ Site development plan approval g Nonconforming use change ❑ Special Use Permit. ❑ Flood plain special exception ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ interpretation of Code ❑ Temporary Use, Buildings, Signs ❑ Lot line Adjustment ❑ Minor Subdivision (5 lots or less) ❑ Planned Building Group ❑ Subdivision (More than 5 lots) ❑ Street Vacation ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final ❑ Other: Detailed description of the request: i t)~ S ✓r0 A c k- ©F S 2 -rACt{sfI Fill out the followin information to the best of your knowledge. Current Zoning: Size of Lot (acres or square footage): 112-00 . Current use: t Gt-E- TAMIL-`I Proposed use: S Arne Assessors Parcel Number: 39- Z S 3 - 1 I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above, without whose consent the requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners must submit power-of-attorne . om the er w approved of this action on his behalf. Signature of Applican me this c3tcl day of~(f 19 ~8 Subscribed and swo ~n pto U _ Ab o~'ht k 4 OLC! C\ Notary Public My commission expires Date received _(o ck-73-q i Receipt No. ~~rJ Case No. 09- 17 - Related Case No. Zoning / Quarter Section Map S-1109-57 I NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment on July 23, 1998, at 7:30 p.m. at 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. The following petitions shall be heard: 1. Case No. WA-98-20: An application by Jon Bradbury for approval of an 11' front yard setback variance to the 30' setback requirement to construct a garage. Said property is zoned R-2 and located at 4380 Newland Street. 2. Case No. WA-98-21: An application by Gene Hartley for approval of a 5' side yard setback to the 15' side yard setback requirement to construct a detached garage. Said property is zoned R-1 and located at 6710 W. 28' Avenue. Case No. WA-98-22: An application by Linda Christensen for approval of a 5' side yard setback variance to the 5' setback requirement for a storage shed. Said property is zoned R-2 and located at 2790 Vance Street. 4. Case No. WA-98-23: An application by Sandra Hutchcroft for approval of a 9.5' side yard setback to the 15' setback requirement for the purpose of constructing a storage shed. Said property is zoned R-1 and located at 3263 Taft Court. Barbara Delgadillo, cording Secretary ATTEST: Wanda Sang, City C1 To be Published: Wheat Ridge Transcript Date: July 3, 1998 C ABub=kBOA\PUBHRGS\980723. wpd 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80215 June 30, 1998 Dear Property Owner: The City of a~p~ WHEAT O Wheat ,m GRidge cOZ O R Apo This is to inform you that Case No. WA-98-21 which is a request for a 5' side yard setback to the 15' side yard setback requirement located at 6710 W. 28`h Avenue will be heard by the Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue. The meeting will be held on July 23, 1998, at 7:30 p.m. All owners and/or their legal counsel of the parcel under consideration must be present at this hearing. As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to notify any other persons whose presence is desired at this hearing. If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2846. Thank you. Planning Division. C:\Ba bua\BOA\PUBHRGS\wa9821.wpd (303) 234-5900 • ADMINISTRATION FAX: 234-5924 POLICE DEPARTMENT FAX: 235-2949 a v 3I ~ c v W d ~ d .U ~ C U •U N N C -Q m 'o = Q U ~6 m Z ? • vi c ~ m a y K c J a ~ a ' •-y U u ~ y a y N a 9 ~ ) N Y O a W O ~ m O C N d = d t o 0 a o # A a C y N O A N N N N x~ :o U RJ m W m W rn W m Q v m 3 3 3 3 m ar v a Q v w •M Q O ) C _ U C C i V N _ V S O N C V ~ N V a O N W d W T Y ry~ O N E N d~ N c c6g0 ~QO ctoo =Qo W N U i$U U M m O ai a `m OI l m ai of N OI O U w U `m O) "o m ai c 01 NN y ` 0 ~ ' > a1 Y (n JOK K ~ OR ~>K V d N d O d -~R O m N V m ~ y~ t ~ ~ .C 0 N•:L J ~ L = 5 d - a ad~ U o m V C7 N N U Q OJ J ~ 2 2 a) . N NO x sU 0~LLw ~ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ z m U w T N a W W W O Q W o 0 0 0 w w O d E ~ m m m co rn co so m ~o m m U ' Z aQw w ~ ~ N O Q o O w I_ CD a U Lr> CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT INVOICE NAME DATE: CASE NO. yVA ----q - a, FEE TYPE FEE CHARGE ACCOUNT NUMBER Application Submittal See Fee Schedule _ 01-550-01-551 Publications/Notices See Fee Schedule 01-550-02-551 24" x 36" Blue Line $ 3.25 01-550-04-551 24" x 36" Mylar Copy $ 6.00 01-550-04-551 Single Zoning Map $ 2.00 01-550-04-551 Set of Zoning Maps $20.00 01-550-04-551 11" x 17" Color Map $ 2.00 01-550-04-551 Comp. Plan Maps $ 2.00 ea. 01-550-04-551 Comp. Plan Book w/Map $25.00 01-550-04-551 Fruitdale Valley Master Plan $ 2.50 01-550-04-551 Subdivision Regulations $ 4.50 01-550-04-551 . Zoning Ordinance $15.00 (does not include annual updates) 01-550-04-551 Copies $.15/page 01-550-04-551 Copy of Meeting Tapes $25.00/tape 01-550-04-551 Miscellaneous: 01-550-04-551 TOTAL COST: c AplenningWomAinvoice