The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWA-98-347500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215 Wheat Telephone 303/ 237-6944 FAX 303/234-5924 March 5, 1999 Mr. Edmond Moreno 4655 Swadley Street Wheat Ridge, Co 80033 RE: WA-98-34 Dear Mr. Moreno: Ridge Please be advised that at its meeting of February 25, 1999, the Board of Adjustment APPROVED your request for a 450 square foot maximum building coverage variance to the 400 maximum building coverage requirement and a one-foot, nine-inch side yard setback variance to the five-foot side yard setback requirement for your property at 4655 Swadley Street. Attached is a copy of the Certificate of Resolution stating the Board's decision which became effective the date of the meeting, February 25, 1999. Should you decide to appeal the decision of the Board, you will need to notify the Jefferson County district court in writing within 30 days of the Board's decision. Please feel free to contact me at (303) 235-2846 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Barbara Delgadillo Planning and Development Secretary /bd cc: WA-98-34 C:\Barbara\BOA\CORUSP\wa9834momno%2.wpd CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTION I, Ann Lazzeri, Secretary to the City of Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment, do hereby certify that the following Resolution was duly adopted in the City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado on the 25th day of February, 1999. CASE NO: WA-98-34 APPLICANT'S NAME: Ed Moreno LOCATION: 4655 Swadley Street Upon a motion by Board Member ABBOTT, seconded by Board Member ECHELMEYER, the following resolution was stated: WHEREAS, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and WHEREAS, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-98-34 is an appeal to this Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and WHEREAS, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law and there were no protests registered against it; and WHEREAS, the relief applied for may be granted without detriment to the public welfare and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge; and WHEREAS, the Board finds that, based upon all evidence presented and based upon the Board's conclusions relative to the criteria given for this variance, the evidence and facts in this case do support the granting of this request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-99-04 be, and hereby is, APPROVED. TYPE OF VARIANCE: A 450 square foot maximum building coverage variance to the 400 square foot maximum building coverage requirement, and a one-foot, nine-inch side yard setback variance to the five-foot side yard setback requirement for a property zoned Residential-Two and located at 4655 Swadley Street. FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: In the surrounding neighborhood the properties contain around 20,000 square feet in lot area and house various agricultural uses; therefore, the request for a hay shed is not uncommon in this area. The property is 8,925 square feet in excess of the minimum 9,000 square foot lot area required for a single family dwelling located in the R-2 zone district. Board of Adjustment Resolution No. WA-98-34 Page Two (2) 2. The property in question measures 75 feet in width and approximately 245 width in depth. Due to the considerable depth of the property there is a large area of developable space where a structure could be built without affecting any of the adjacent habitable structures. The rear portion of many of these properties are used for horse farmaculture. 3. The neighbors in the same block on the same side of the street at 4625 and 4675 Swadley submitted letters of support for these variances. 4. The structure is open on three sides and therefore does not affect the view plane to the degree of a fully enclosed structure. As the supporting poles and roof are in place, it would be considered generally impractical to move the structure at this time by a distance of one foot and nine inches. 6. As the lot is only 75 feet wide, options for circulation within the lot are limited; therefore, the need for the setback variance. 7. The nearest adjacent structure is a garage, fifty (plus or minus) feet away and this structure would not be directly imperiled by the granting of this setback variance. 8. The immediate neighborhood has several similar appearing rear yards. WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The structure may not be enclosed on more than one side. 2. One existing shed, as indicated at this hearing, shall be removed thirty days following the final inspection by the Building Department. The final inspection will be required to occur within 60 days giving the applicant at most 90 days to remove the existing shed. VOTE: Yes: ABBOTT, ECHELMEYER, HOVLAND, MAURO, THIESSEN No: HOWARD Absent: JUNKER, WALKER DISPOSITION: A 450 square foot maximum building coverage variance from to the 400 square foot maximum building coverage requirement and a one-foot, nine-inch side yard setback variance to the five-foot side yard setback requirement for a property zoned Residential-Two and located at 4655 Swadley Street was granted. Board of Adjustment Resolution No. 98-34 Page three (3) ADOPTED and made effective this 25th day of February, 1999. O INDA MAURO, Chairman Ann Lazzeri, Secretary Board of Adjustment Board of Adjustment 5. PUBLIC HEARING A. Case No. WA-98-34: An application by Ed Moreno for approval of a 450 square foot variance from the 400 foot maximum square footage allowed for a private storage shed to allow more space for hay storage. Said property is zoned R-2 and located at 4655 Swadley Street. This case was presented by Sean McCartney. He reviewed the staff report and presented slides and overhead projections of the subject property. He entered all pertinent documents into the record and advised that there was jurisdiction for the Board to hear the case. He stated that two neighbors, at 4655 Swadley and 4625 Swadley, had submitted letters of support, and that approval of the request should not alter the essential character of the locality nor have a detrimental impact on the adjacent properties. Board Member THIESSEN asked the reason for the setback variance request. Mr. McCartney replied that, since the applicant was not aware of the need for a building permit, construction had already begun on the structure which encroaches one foot and nine inches into the setback requirement. Edmond Moreno 4655 Swadley Street Mr. Moreno was sworn in by Chair MAURO. He stated that he was not aware of the need for a building permit and had a contractor begin construction on a shed which he plans to use for hay storage. A stop order was placed by the City of Wheat Ridge Building Division and he is now applying for a variance in order to complete construction of his storage shed. He has been storing hay outside with a covering of tarps which has resulted in the loss of three to four tons of hay every year due to moisture and formation of mold. Board Member ABBOTT asked if three open sides on the structure would be adequate to protect the hay. Mr. Moreno replied that the design would not only offer the protection that he needs but would allow for easy removal of the hay. He also stated that he has a 200 square foot shed on his property which will be removed when the subject shed is completed. In response to a question from Board Member HOWARD regarding the size of the structure, Mr. McCartney replied that the shed was 20 feet long and 16 feet wide. Board Member THIESSEN questioned the hardship associated with the side yard setback and asked if the requested variance would allow for adequate separation between structures if future building takes place on the adjacent vacant lot. Mr. McCartney stated that the code permits encroachment up to 30% into a side yard setback for structures such as porches which are open on three sides, and that the subject structure is similar in this regard. Board Member THIESSEN commented that the shed would not appear to be open when it is full of hay. Board of Adjustment Page 2 02/25/99 Board Member ABBOTT asked the applicant how high he intended to pile the hay. Mr. Moreno stated that it would be stacked to within several inches of the top of the shed, however the height of the stack would vary as he uses the hay. Board Member HOVLAND stated that he felt it would be an undue hardship to have the applicant move the structure at this time; however, he expressed concern about granting variances because a structure is already in place before the applicant has obtained a building permit. Board Member ABBOTT moved and Board Member ECHELMEYER seconded that Case No. 98-34, a request for approval of a 450 square foot maximum building coverage variance to the 400 square foot maximum building coverage requirement and a one-foot nine-inch side yard setback variance to the five-foot side yard setback requirement for a property zoned Residential-Two and located at 4655 Swadley Street, be approved for the following reasons. In the surrounding neighborhood the properties contain around 20,000 square feet in lot area and house various agricultural uses; therefore, the request for a hay shed is not uncommon in this area. The property is 8,925 square feet in excess of the minimum 9,000 square foot lot area required fora single family dwelling located in the R-2 zone district. 2. The property in question measures 75 feet in width and approximately 245 width in depth. Due to the considerable depth of the property there is a large area of developable space where a structure could be built without affecting any of the adjacent habitable structures. The rear portion of many of these properties are used for horse farm-aculture. 3. The neighbors in the same block on the same side of the street at 4625 and 4675 Swadley submitted letters of support for these variances. 4. The structure is open on three sides and therefore does not affect the view plane to the degree of a fully enclosed structure. 5. As the supporting poles and roof are in place, it would be considered generally impractical to move the structure at this time by a distance of one foot and nine inches. As the lot is only 75 feet wide, options for circulation within the lot are limited; therefore, the need for the setback variance. 7. The nearest adjacent structure is a garage, fifty (plus or minus) feet away and this structure would not be directly imperiled by the granting of this setback variance. Board of Adjustment Page 3 02/25/99 8. The immediate neighborhood has several similar appearing rear yards. With the following conditions: The structure may not be enclosed on more than one side. 2. One existing shed, as indicated at this hearing, shall be removed thirty days following inspection by the Building Department and the final inspection will be required to occur within sixty days. The motion passed by a vote of 5 to 1 with Board Member HOWARD voting no and Board Members JUNKER and WALKER absent. Chair MAURO advised the applicant that his request had been approved. B. Case No. WA-99-04: An application by Ken Billingsley for a variance from Section 26- 30(N) which requires a paved driveway area twenty feet wide and twenty-five feet long from the edge of pavement of a public street into the property, in order to maintain an existing gravel driveway. Said property is zoned R-2 and located at 4240 Iris Street. This case was presented by Sean McCartney. He reviewed the staff report and presented slides and overhead projections of the subject property. He entered all pertinent documents into the record and advised that there was jurisdiction for the Board to hear the case. He stated that staff recommended approval of the variance because allowing the existing gravel driveway to remain on site should not be detrimental to the public's welfare, alter the essential character of the locality nor hinder any future property improvements within the neighborhood. Ken Billingsley 4240 Iris Street Mr. Billingsley stated that he is planning to replace an existing carport with a garage and would like to retain his present gravel driveway. He was not aware of the pavement requirement until it was discovered by the garage contractor when he went to pull the building permit. He stated that six of the twenty-one houses in his neighborhood have complete gravel driveways and all of the houses have a gravel cap over the drainage culverts. Board Member HOVLAND commented that a requirement for a paved driveway seems more logical when there is a curb and gutter situation. Upon a motion by Board Member ABBOTT and second by Board Member THIESSEN, the following resolution was stated: Board of Adjustment Page 4 02/25/99 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO: Board of Adjustment DATE OF MEETING: CASE NO. & NAME February 25, 1999 DATE PREPARED: February 17, 1999 WA-98-34/ Moreno CASE MANAGER: Sean McCartney ACTION REQUESTED: Request for approval of a 450 square foot maximum building coverage variance to the 400 square foot maximum building coverage requirement and a 1'9" side yard setback variance to the 5' side yard setback requirement. LOCATION OF REQUEST: NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT: NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER: 4655 Swadley Street Edmond Moreno 4655 Swadley Street Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Same APPROXIMATE AREA: 17,925 square feet PRESENT ZONING: Residential-Two PRESENT LAND USE: Single-family residential SURROUNDING ZONING: N:, W:, E: and S: Residential-Two SURROUNDING LAND USE: N:, W:, S: and E: Single-family and Two- family residential DATE PUBLISHED: February 5, 1999 DATE POSTED: February 11, 1999 DATED LEGAL NOTICES SENT: February 1, 1999 ENTER INTO RECORD: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIAL (X) ZONING ORDINANCE SLIDES SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS (X) EXHIBITS (1 OTHER JURISDICTION: The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. I. REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a 450 square foot maximum building coverage variance to the 400 square foot maximum building coverage requirement, and a 19" side yard setback variance to the 5' side yard setback requirement to allow for an additional storage shed. The additional storage shed would be used for the storage of hay. This request first came to staffs attention as part of a stop work order issued by the Wheat Ridge Building Division. The applicant began construction on the shed before he knew that a building permit was required before he started to build. Upon viewing the proposed structure, it is noticeably evident that the structure will remain open on all but the north side (closest to the property) and will truly be utilized as more of a permanent cover for the hay. This type of construction allows for the easy removal of the hay. 'The applicant has stated in his application that the additional storage shed is required for the storage of feed hay he uses for his show horses. The applicant has estimated that they lose up to 4 tons of hay, per year, due to exposure to the elements. In the past, they have used tarp's to cover the hay, but have been unsuccessful in covering the hay during any windstorm. Pursuant to Section 26-15(F), of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, the maximum building coverage permitted for a storage shed in the Residential-Two zone district is 400 square feet. Currently, there are two storage sheds out on the sight: a 350 square foot shed that the applicant uses to store bridal equipment and a 200 square foot shed that will be removed upon completion of the shed in question. To date, staff has not received any opposition regarding this case. II SITE PLAN The property in question is located in District IVthe "rural" section of Wheat Ridge. In the surrounding neighborhood, the properties are contain around 20,000 square feet in lot area and house various agricultural uses. Therefore, the request for a "hay shed" is not uncommon for this area. The property is 8,925 square feet in excess of the minimum 9,000 square foot lot area required for a single family dwelling located in the Residential-Two zone district. The property in question measures 75' in width and approximately 245' in depth. Due to the extreme depth of the property, there is a large area of developable space where a structure could be built and not affect any of the adjacent, habitable structures. The rear portion of most of these properties are used for horse farmaculture. As previously stated, the applicant currently has two existing storage sheds on the property. The applicant intends on removing the 200 square foot shed upon approval of this variance request. 4 -z III VARIANCE CRITERIA Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a variance request: 1. Can the property in question yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located? Yes. If the request is denied, the property may continue to be used as a single-family residence. However, since the property is used to house horses, and the material needed for proper upkeep of horses is bulky in nature, there seems to be a need for the additional storage area that is not currently allowed for in the existing zone district. 2. Is the plight of the owner due to unique circumstances? No. Even though the property is larger than the average lot found in the Residential-Two zone district, the plight of the owner is not due to unique circumstances.. 3. If the variation were granted, would it alter the essential character of the locality? No. As previously stated, this property is located in a section of Wheat Ridge where semi- agricultural uses are common. Also, because the property is approximately 245' deep, the proposed shed, which will be located in the rear of the property, will be shielded from the adjacent public right-of-way. Therefore, approval of this variance should not alter the essential character of the locality. 4. Would the particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved result in a particular hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out? No. The property is rectangular in shape (75'X 245') and relatively flat in topography. Therefore, the physical shape or topography of the property does not result in a particular hardship. 5. Would the conditions upon which the petition for a variation is based be applicable, generally, to the other property within the same zoning classification? Yes. All applications are reviewed on a case-by-case basis thereby changing the outcome for each request. 6. Is the purpose of the variation based exclusively upon a desire to make money out of the - property No. Even though the applicant states his hardship based on money lost in weathered hay, the purpose of the variance is not based exclusively upon a desire to make money out of the property. The purpose of the variation is provide additional shelter for the hay. k3 7. Has the alleged difficulty or hardship been created by any person presently having an interest in the property? Yes. The applicant, who has sole interest of the property, has created a self-imposed hardship by not researching the development requirements established in the Residential-Two zone district. 8. Would the granting of the variations be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located? No. If approved, the storage shed should not be detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to other properties or improvements in that storage sheds are a common structure found in the Residential-Two zone district. 9. Would the proposed variation impair the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion in the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. No. Because the proposed storage shed will remain open on all but 1 side, the approval of the variance should not impair the adequate supply of light and air to the adjacent property. Also, because the shed will be located in the rear of the property, the shed should not increase congestion in the pubic streets. 10. If it is found in criteria 8 and 9 above that granting of the variation would not be detrimental or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood, and it is also found that public health and safety, public facilities and surrounding property values would not be diminished or impaired, then would the granting of the variance result in a benefit or contribution to the neighborhood or the community as distinguished from an individual benefit on the part of the applicant, or would granting of the variance result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities? No. Approval of this request will not directly benefit or contribute to the neighborhood or community. This request is purely for individual benefit. VI. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION The property in question is located in a section of Wheat Ridge where "semi-agricultural" uses are common and the support equipment which is generally involved with agricultural uses usually requires more storage than the standard residential use, thereby requiring the need for larger storage structures. Also, the average property size, in the immediate vicinity, is larger than the minimum lot size established in the Residential-Two zone district, allowing for a larger than average building area that , when built upon, does not directly impose on any adjacent properties. Therefore, approval of this request should not alter the essential character of the locality nor have a detrimental impact on the adjacent properties. k_1 V. RECOMMENDED MOTIONS Option A: "I move that Case No. WA-99-04, a request for approval of a 450 square foot maximum building coverage variance to the 400 square foot maximum building coverage requirement and a 19" side yard setback variance to the 5' side yard setback requirement for a property zoned Residential-Two and located at 4655 Swadley Street, be APPROVED for the following reasons: 1. Approval of this request will not be detrimental to the public's welfare. 2. Approval of this request will not alter the essential character of the locality. 3. The property provides "semi-agricultural" uses on site and therefore requires more storage than the typical property located in the Residential-Two zone district. 4. Staff recommends approval. Option B: "I move that Case No. WA-99-04, a request for approval of a 450 square foot maximum building coverage variance to the 400 square foot maximum building coverage requirement and a 19" side yard setback variance to the 5' side yard setback requirement for a property zoned Residential-Two and located at 4655 Swadley Street, be DENIED for the following reasons: I. The request is based on a self-imposed hardship." 4 -5 OFFICIAL ZONING MAP NHEAT RIDGE COLORADO MAP ADOPTED: June 15, 1994 Last Revision: April 7, 1998 D8'ARTP~1IT OF PIJM% AND DEVB0R EI4T - 735-78M ® AREA REQUIRING SITE PLAN APPROVAL ZONE DISTRICT BOUNDRY - PARCEL/LOT BOUNDRY (DESIGNATES OWNERSHIP) CITY LIMIT LINE WATER FEATURE • DENOTES MULTIPLE ADDRESSES NE 20 roaTM o w m SCA aro LE 1' so 400 .oo / ~u - n s t c J d M. > c z c z O c > Z O i O T Z - z n n • H K > >>z " ` co I: o a ~ i z - i W f eea y/ n~ e., N I - 2 ~ - • i - I, ~o n ~ a O n \ n 1 n { V l r• ~ of j 8 c, e~ ~ w p \ a i i O ~ ~3 • 0 b 2 Gh freFes<d i S`4 'pel<Es..~e ~ e2 J 'n 7S,o• J r a 0 m I\ a n i0 n D "V Con•c PA rio _ n I ~Fre Caf6e 1 J I 1 \ I r. r. O I I SS 3' TX, <CV.< J\ 1 Q/2 /CK~FRAME ~~Q N a 9J .9~ 0.553 C /i a" 'el 40 ' 6 5 o 4 I oh'/r~ Ge~c, n { ~ - 2 n I I n I . I IV T m AfFPO)(l N(P7F- LoLen flfl O F AoSn cvFll- 0412e19E ~J Y ?lal`~ hU~17 W II - 6-x NDRT7.1 No Scala SW~~~~r~ ~f, G/✓Ltr<cf{T/2/,c~s-r , ~v`. f J s/6Ss S / - dye Cdr rs<3 c~7 ✓ri, .F Quo n.p7L 6~~ ~e f fz, o//v c~nngfver.mn - s i i I } i x ~~8 .4- ~ Mr. & Mrs. Charles R. Newlon 4645 Swadley Street Wheat Ridge, Colo. 80033 12/13/98 Charles R. Newlon and Shelia Jo Newlon have no objection to Edmond Moreno building a hay shelter. Note that we are Edmond's next door neighbors to the south. Sincerly, Charles R. Newlon jl,~4 Sheila Jo Newlon 7yy 2;- (J 33 Cp~ L TO thecity Wheatridge CO i rn 0 N 0 0 0 IT a. O Cl) cr. 11! 0 cr. cr. CO W 2 O a - F e c e Q sF o O J ~ A a W ` W c° A w I r o C O a F u c o - U C z w H U a C W O G ~ z L U p U m to x O' ft _ w ca y w 0 2. p E 5 S y H M O Ems., spa z w ppW A~ W O O ~a x z F a n ~ W # .y m 9 m w y 0- cr a1- p .O O a y b U. N p 'O aj o`1 t N # ..r to O N O o 0 N v p. 0 L U~ r 00 E o o p yy • '.t . . Or 7 0 • N C O 0 Y h ~ ~7 ~ N~ d (C p y pj U ri y t r o t E a d y T. p m 0 3 d~ •C U y y 79 m. ~ a-w u~ o ; ~ ea - mom. r o A m - °t d c E oYpEw o v ~ . S oYp o °ya ° Z 0 Z Oz ° pop E e U - p U-0.0 RS 3 d O LL ` 0 3; w .O r0 T r c y u c .n O N N U O E Y s Y < y N .O y E x w y w o oc L u N s 0 o y~ a°i o = yap Q cI ,$s ~ L * p 0 0 a be A Y v d h r; V Y y C d W 00 N w Off. .0. U 7 y~ U w w E ~ - p s U 6 b C p E ra d p L U _ 6 O c d RT y 0 N h 'O icw Z L-] Uy 2 N 0 x~ . d y y E ='8 t5 ~ T ai U p 0 C y A I y r U y .0 ip d 2 Z d -0 -0 w C ^A.., w m U ~ cn 8 ~ w.. z = 3 4~~ o F ay ¢ s,~v j~ u ~ E.~ i . y 4 U v n d S `r y p y C y LL w. o w .r N r ~ a ° v° O o x 0 o °pL p E ME d y X . O10.a ° --•O 'O ° ° F - n p, U1 J o 0 d T U Y w m~ o~ a ~v9-0 ¢ o D 0,0PC f =cn 0.0 0.6 , ,.y 0 ~ ° r O U N 'J F U ° z =EY o+ o~. ~e.. 4rL a tav o ~t a c o m a o y2 'Cy$~° X o aw ° a~ > >d q p ' ° o U tm z p ~ a o < z a w 0C a ? v o 3 c u't z c : Q b O F d 00 w 0o 0 . k 0 ~ "w a co x 0Q W o v u mu 0 ~ vZ cry- rn o m oW ~ a . w oa N s T 4 W pN Y b F E N 'y r y aE p o p O'm ti wU N V a Ow a o.~~9. LL m v 3~ o h m 5303CL,w ^N = ° y U ti a m O U u., d ° a O 0 9 W p~OS cv' in V o g 3c, i E ~n~ y c w a T M U x O I 'C G d h p U _ " E 7 d> H °O - m sco ow o ~ ~ d ~ d o~ s o 0 -0 v CS 'm 3 w A° a o aW 3 3 U 0. 0 > t) y b = _ "ass i° a 14 m 7 •s~ ~y 'S Ea ° o .~e a~i 7s an S N m = u 5 c 7 hi N qO 'O p O O C q In O N 'C 'J ttl m 0. w v h °o aci c c'^i aQi o ° x T 3 c^ E v .4 78 x m 3 ^ F°y c i :2 5u 78 ° o z o .0 3 d ~ o a c r~ ~ ° ~ ~ 7 o •o ' w o c .S o E E U o b c~ S a78 ° a -5 m °i E o o ai n c° a y T L ma 7s ~ ~ ~ ° c B c w cn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ axi s ~ ca a ti ~ c a° b a=i o c°a cc ~ .S .9 b E o o b0 S .5 q ~ x ~ ] ~ G at 'S ~ .Q ac`, ~ o m o 'v o. ~ T y r b 4 3 °O E m a 3 d p x o' c ° E -S •s a a2 e m r~. 4¢ OR F-c x T a~ c3 3 Z, •o o d -5 'r... o w c S o o E 0.0 ° O cr3 w 53 W E A is vs a=i 'ca T v„{ 'a a T o ox o. 5 ap o n E.A E y S'3 O H L 0 = 5w N a E w d a s y n m E > 79 '..3 0 'x g m = " 3 o 0 3 S ^ z W '~o E+ C ~ o v ~ z ~ ~ E ° ~ ° +c O m b ~ z$ ~ s~ v 'n E E? ~ a=i E c C a=i a°~ c a~ a~ a F,=O = T ETaam£ gyp Tpg~ a ~ L] W ° H ;5 ^ _ ~ Aga 30 ~ p`0, s O m c E ~ ° ~ 3 ~ m V gypp' m a ° 0. h °N •5 E. ° ❑ 5 3 g 'S U c o, -S 2 79 X -S pC Co v ~o a4 SEo 79 ovCx7E~ao~ a~ zQ`~ p. 0. y b csi~ i A a E cXd. ° z £ a s a=i a9i CA o s 'C W 2 S 1.14 ar; •S E 'Sw E ° as G 3n z Z v 3 *Q 3 c G .='ma 8 p E 'S p o a O a v E W F p E nW m E C E O o E T m> s z^ y f~ z x 4 W L y 5 a a~q ° 19 ® O^U ~T,z,^°~pjpQ„Q33q .o ~3 p~Op..aEocc~.0--~a`i~~~~ p - UO ~ o .a N 'O N ~ N ~ ~ ~ E E N a3 ~ .a ~ ~ s ca 3 ° o cn m .b S ~D yam, N° o c .T 3 ° S ,h a A~- rJ L '3 N 'O z R A= s 'o o~ 0 3 3 E p "p c a 'cn ~-,tz m 0 -a O-S T° E ~ E~ ^y3 ~ g m R ~ b ~ S c~ ~ •o ~ E•o ~W ~ c E o S c m o en 5 z 0 pT xi ~ G T 'O 'C7 y? .S U 0. W ~ o m c4 ° 8 y a .E = o 78 o LL o W 73 3 ti 3 c c S s E° C aCi .5 g E A m 6 -a A a •o c z° E _AS E° w "s~° y ° z > h LL C a78 a b b° o° q S 8 G 0 ° o ' S y'~-o ' g S E q 4 cy o s a~i .4 4 a W •o a O y a 'S o z S `o `n ai a m „ •o ° o s ° o z 3 3 c s " U c w o W a+ y v v. x m m y. z v R 4 ry y. E •o z C =x.'.3 c>a m o`z ? cyx"x E ~z TW `z o a= a a d R ~ T... .c a o = 3 u 0 a~ °a = E' o E o y 0 a o v ° x a a a 5 °$3y > Q° z° 3 v Q a e G q>q o a s ~o a o v~ E c~a s~~ ~x z cba ~ ~F qr LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION ~F WHEarP Planning and Development Department n 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge. CO 80033 Phone 203) 235-2S46 (Please print or type all information) Applicant ~d Moreno Address 46,55 Swad le, ~ • Phone 3o,3-4a V-/'17I City wke- a fe dQe' l a0le)r (0 ,~6(MOrl d 070r010 Address 466-9 cSwa((lew SI, Phone 303-9W-4-// Owner - .d R 0-010 26033 City Wy 6 , Location of request (address) S Sf. pi-d ~o Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions li ste d below which pertain to your request.) ❑ Change of zone or zone conditions Variance / Waiver ❑ Site development plan approval Nonconforming use change ❑ Special Use Permit ❑ Flood plain special exception ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Interpretation of Code ❑ Temporary Use, Buildings, Signs ❑ Lot line Adjustment ❑ Minor Subdivision (5 lots or less) ❑ Planned Building Group ❑ Subdivision (More than 5 lots) C - F-1 Street Vacation 1 Final ❑ Preliminary F ❑ Other: Detailed description of the request: 1 m ore CoU2red spone or tDYa 44 o a We as ea.s a s 00V aft u d ear e 0s f or er 4o le L .4n e w o !so r, Moreno has a k ewl oss wh-'6 Fill out the following information to the best of your knowledge. need or more S oraode span ' Current Zoning: Size of Lot (acres or square footage): Current use: Proposed use: Assessors Parcel Number: I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above,' without whose consent the.requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners must submit power-of-at rng~y froM~hee owner which approved of this action on his behalf. Signature of ApplicantG~ti:Yw-X L~Cd •~cs3~ Subscribed and sworn to me this RA) day of ~C , , T9G~ Notary Public My commission expires ~C - Date received Receipt No. Case No. W Related Case No. A) 14 orn a Quarter Section Map NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT on February 25, 1999, at 7:30 p.m. at 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. The following petitions. shall be heard: Case No. WA-98-34 : An application by Ed Moreno for approval of a 450 square foot variance from the 400' maximum square footage allowed for sheds to allow more space for hay storage. Said property is zoned R-2 and located at 4655 Swadley Street. 2. Case No. WA-99-04: An application by Ken Billingsley for a variance from Section 26- 30 (N) which requires a paved drive area 20' wide and 25' long from the edge of pavement of a public street into the property in order to maintain an existing gravel driveway. Said property is zoned R-2 and located at 4240 Iris Street. l G jXC't'a" C, Barbara Delgadillo, Recor&ng Secretary ATTEST: L Wanda Sang, City Cler To be Published: Wheat Ridge Transcript Date: February 5, 1999 C:\Barb=%BOA\PUBHRGS\M225.wpd .,ie City of 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80215 Wheat 9Ridge February 2, 1999 Dear Property Owner: This is to inform you that Case No. WA-98-34 which is a request for approval of a 450 square foot variance from the 400 square foot maximum allowed for sheds to allow more space for hay storage on property located at 4655 Swadley Street will be heard by the Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue. The meeting will be held on February 25, 1999, at 7:30 p.m. All owners and/or their representative of the parcel under consideration must be present at this hearing. As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to notify any other persons whose presence is desired at this hearing. If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2846. Thank you. Planning Division. C:\B ubua\BOA\PUBHRGS\wa9834cert.wpd (303) 234-5900 • ADMINISTRATION FAX: 234-5924 POLICE DEPARTMENT FAX: 235-2949 a m N J~ C d d ~ a C ~ C ~ y N U 3 ~ a U ~ B a N Q 7 C « d U U ` L ~ O N C ~ 2 m . ~ NI O d ~ C '-y a U O U j O ~ ~NJ N rn O ~1 a `£o d w U L O ~ n m o N a - N'O L N W N W W N W W X U O w ~ N U rn m OJ m rn m m m rn m rn m m m rn m Q m° ~ 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 v R 'IC O. M M M M ('J M N N N C N _ O R O C 0 N NNE 0 Q ~ Y O CO 0 N WW O d 0 Q O 0- O nc, O N N 0 O O N 0 NM m d E'O d m :6 Z'6 0 3 NQ ° m f7o N U a ISO m r U N m o w o 3 a a; N 3 0 m U Q y a 's of ova ~Na ` 2V) Nam roc R 2 CD m m Q , ENK 0 mu K cmmE m oo N°m o.O- L' 0 OL 1 W M t6 Uo N O N ~M Z (nM O OM Z ia~ a C L.1 ° ' 1° L V' ~ V N L V' N L N L OJ Q `m O M <.7 ~ a «.Q m~ N C c v m a Ti L ~ ~ ~ d G m N amK"m ` Q ~.~?O w c a ~ d `O m rn 0 n d d' ~U U0 i w m d In u r lL r < N U' 0 0 rn m rn rn m m rn rn Q m rn rn m m rn rn m W O E rn rn rn m m m m m > V z Q Lu O W xFO U- N z_ O da a z CDw J = C N U rn a Cp U ~i O O C1. v H U Y U F 0 b v T P 0 v z H 7500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215 Wheat Telephone 303/ 237-6944 FAX 303/234-5924 February 1, 1999 Mr. Edmond Moreno 4655 Swadley Street Wheat Ridge, Co 80033 RE: WA-98-34 Dear Mr. Moreno: Ridge Please be advised that at its meeting of January 28, 1999, the Board of Adjustment continued your request for approval of a variance to the maximum square footage allowed for building coverage. Your request was continued for additional information until the Board's next regular meeting of February 25, 1999. Please feel free to contact me at (303) 235-2846 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Barbara Delgadillo Planning and Development Secretary /bd cc: WA-98-34 C:\Barbara\BOA\CORRESP\wa9834moreno.wpd NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT on January 28,1999, at 7:30 p.m. at 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. The following petitions shall be heard: 1. Case No. WA-98-32: An application by Curtis Krey for approval of a 5' variance from the 5' side yard setback requirement and an 8.5' variance from the 30' front yard setback requirement for the purpose of an 8'x 10' storage shed. Said property is zoned R-2 and located at 7110 W. 29' Avenue. 2. Case No. WA-98-34 : An application by Ed Moreno for approval of a 300' variance from the 400' maximum square footage allowed for sheds to allow more space for hay storage. Said property is zoned R-2 and located at 4655 Swadley Street. Case No. WA-99-01: An application by Galloway, Romero and Associates for approval of a 16.25 foot front yard variance from the 50' front yard setback requirement to construct a gas station canopy along with a convenience store, laundry building, and car wash. Said property is zoned C-1 and R-3 and located at 5600 W. 38' Avenue. 4. Case No. WA-99-02: An application by Best Marine Service for approval to allow a 6' chain link fence on the west portion of the front yard property line approximately 130' to provide security and employee protection on the north side of the building. Said property is zoned Industrial and located at 12098 W. 5011 Place. Barbara Delgadillo, Recording Secretary ATTEST: Wanda Sang, City Clerk To be Published: Wheat Ridge Transcript Date: January 8, 1999 C:1Kathy\BOA\PUBHRGS\1999\990128.wpd me City of 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80215 Wheat 9Ridge January 6, 1999 Dear Property Owner: This is to inform you that Case No. WA-98-34 which is a request for approval of a 300' variance from the 400' maximum square footage allowed for sheds to allow more space for hay storage on property located at 4655 Swadley Street will be heard by the Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue. The meeting will be held on January 28, 1999, at 7:30 p.m. All owners and/or their representative of the parcel under consideration must be present at this hearing. As an area resident or interested parry, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to notify any other persons whose presence is desired at this hearing. If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2846. Thank you. Planning Division. C:\Barbara\BOA\PUBHRGS\wa9834cert.wpd (303) 234-5900 • ADMINISTRATION FAX: 234-5924 POLICE DEPARTMENT FAX: 235-2949 v w~ v ! v 'v d C 'U y a ~ a d U d a O G z O > NI O ~ d a! C D 9 I K > a! N o ~ O N ~ l~ N N y d 1 0 0 a N w U L O N oo~ ~ o ~ M M M M M y C ~ L U W VI M W M N M N W ttJ N W N X N ' N U N N N t0 N (6 (6 N ¢ m° ~ 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 U •IC N a M M M ~ y N = N ° a c w - 0 4- p cN a mom ao 0 vO 0 ~ o D a arn N m ` :a d o c d ' Z p- o 2 O o p c N n0 m~` w ` o Y y p D K 3: c (q K a ; 0 f /J _ O Nam 2 C O a m3 m V (n a 9 N R 3 0 U z c U ry , w~ ¢ ry m U d y Y W UI Q 0 mO N sNO_' NtO d' _ mmy M Q 'O _O m O.m d O M co 09 A aU_ _ N dL ~~O N OL U~" W b N L V Uf0 N ~ " tp N ~M M 0 O OM Z ~a: - U O N. ` V V C > L> V' L V L N O¢ t 120 f 6¢ ~ C Of NO .Q N L V > (p w - o aa)wo d'~fl v - ~U c~~LLw E m ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Z d LO u ~ N ~ Q M N M M ° v M ~n M so M r M m M O p rn m m rn m m m Q 00 m n r n w 0 E m m w m rn rn m m U z Q Q w z o wx~ N O~Q z o L l Z } o w [ '=x 3 L I I U n~ a . . Q O A. W, s; N h qro N O w O a m p z U y U b 0 N 4J U N a 0 d z H _ *X: ~f. 'i JR~ i v,, 411, , ~~liil) I V I 1 {}N t c)1~r1 t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~,r ry M w~ M t.. I•~ 1 ~ I ~ ~ 11 1 r~ t ~ f t > f ~ r ~ ~ t t , . 1r_~lact ~ i t t i rt ~1t ( ~ ~ , , . f } ra I,~) l_ ~ I~r )t~~l~. ~ ~ ~ I. ~ .,tc..t~t~~'~ 1(~ ~t1., fa ! ~ 3 .at)aa l ra EZ~I ilt t~ ~ ~ ►x' ~ O ~ f )43 , ~ r1 ra 1 ra{~ t )O a rate r}ra t:llc~ `cal ~ , , ~ aI is C 1 rat taC I,(}t. ~ Intl ~ 1rn tall ; (l I t}~ra..la 3 .>t~t,a! fa ~ y,' t +`~(~r 1.11 ~ ! (~~~r1 r. tti(~~i f ! ~ ~ . ~ ~C..t.. ~ f 9~ ~ ~ ~ y / al.~ C)~lt #Et.. ! £ ~ , a ~ c. tl ~ v ~ 1 lac ~ ~ 1 1,O ~ ~~t) r t~ ka ~3 3 jE'~f ~ t . / i f ,1 ~ / 111 a ~ ~ "1 . t"r - ~ r ~ r ~ }~...(,..a r.►~.►~_ t.a (.~a_..:tit I i k.. I t.11~ ..~)t,~ tlt .f.t1 ~ - ~ . )J rlt.r t)I a,.aa(~ I,O~:: ~ ~:~a(`i1 `t► ~ ~~.w d.4,.~, c l t~t)~. ~ CJc}t c to ~ ( `t . , ) t.t1t. 11~t3t"t_~at r.a,~l t.t,} rrac. r t)( .►r~ a c~ I,c)t_ ~ ttac~r ► 1 ray ~ "iil il~ (,C)~_ ~ . ~ r ~ ~ 1111 a n(a tic 4V~.►!_ ~a ~ ~ c . ~ (~.a n r ( ) . ! cry t~ , , `it)a.l I fl c~t~t f►~~ xC• , . . ~ rr~ r r a a~ k ~ ~ ~l . , c c ~ c~ n . ~ ~ . I (tic ~ - ~_1►(~nf.c. ~f~ 111.1 r11~ ~,.t ~ ) _,f C f r' I ~1(~ )a) ~ ~a l- O ~ ~)c►~~ t 6 ~ rara l ray , h c)t1t:I:.Y tat .tt~! f t~r~~c}r~ :;t ~a c t. c)f t.t~ltarf.a(~ra, f k 0 j`, , w i ~ ~ 1. ~r f f 4 / N. i ; € ~ ear L- a r • i_~ o ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ y , ~ , ~ C.; c: ~ ~ ~~L1 t` - . ~ d ~ J~ I F d ~ r~.. a . Q a } ~l l ~ ~ ~ i~ 1 vJ w, h ~ ~ h. Lv',~' ,~C'c.~~~~.a7''~4ni ~ h ~ Q ~ E I ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~t 1 i ~ ~ ~ ~Y} i h ~ I I 1, I ,1 ~ ~v ~ _ ~ ~ f . a _ s ~ r 1 r x ~1~'.,[~t;I~ l 4.. I'.~{ ~ I. i rCr F rTr t!i K~ T ~ ~ , , , 1.~~1 111»J 1~I ltd) rr ~ t~ ('~~9~~~It „ , , , 11»~ ~ 1~1.I 111{~„) 1''l)1~ S 1111 ! I 1 1.~ N(? 1 ~ ~ } r . 11 I.1tN1~ ..,UI~V1:Y T 1 7 !{aIr \f~J) ~ (N file rt ! r. r 3 ~1~ 1. t./~♦ .t. A{~J r E~ 11.111, 11N1) 1l~ni ~ , ~ 1 I 11(~ 1 1 ~ [ Z i'. 1 ~ ~ ~ ~a ~ ~ I..~ ! 11I31.I.~11MI.h 1 ~ r , No coil (}1 1 l.N ,.1.. 131I 1 ICI) r ~ ~ 1 .1 N , ()1~ C? I 111.1 l a a r ~ , , tl 1 UR1. Ii~l 1t(~VI. ~ ~ r r . 1111 ! 111:.It ~1.1~ 1 I 1 Y ~ , ~ , 'I 11.111 1111. 1 ~I { ! ~ ~V ly. . ~/fl = 1.xt..l:.1 1 U 1 11,1 1 Y ' ~I~1. 1.N 1 I.1~1'.1.~` W I I ! ~ ' ~ r , N , 111111 11.11:alrl~. 1111. 1~..►~t..l{U11C.11~It, N~ N I » ► 111'(.1 t~ `1" 111. l I t" } c• w 1...~(~ll.1.131:.1) 1 ~~~af 1 I ~ r{`+V t~ r! r5f` ~ r}ik 1(~ i O h1 11 N Y J1 U.~ 0 I N S. ~ ~ r ~ 11t..1:L 1 !l.! 13~1~ 1 ~ r' ~ rr 1'► t r ~ » ~'u''" ~ "'t l 11 1 1.! 11N{) 11.!111 1 ! - r }c , ,xx , , ll,lli, .5 ;.111 I1 ' _ ~ C` ~ ~ .~ICN dl 11?~X J1~~, I11~{1.~~)I~':,,~.~11~"C` `~'11i l irr c~ A ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~..1. ~ ~ ~ e b ~ i 4 ~ , ~ G~ 4, ~ fiF n4 yid C„ ir) f;' 4x ~l V r.» ~ ~ .,i G .1 `ib 1. H ',i f d` ~r, ~ i : t%~~ r° „ err' r ,r F ~ b,.,~^ C~. a;~ cir a v ~ t, >r ~ > ~ t r N' ~ nj w ' t~ ~ A t r r .r u ~ i; i q. " p .t. li " i~ fl " AV~.J F ~Y~~M4. JW +~eC~. 1ST t Y Y t,~D t~Il ~at~' ~~~~~t~.~~...,_r . k. ~ . . w M. _,n ,~d~ ..f. i r r , i. CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT INVOICE. NAME DATE: J k -G CASE NO. P;~t- UD3s FEE TYPE FEE CHARGE ACCOUNT NUMBER Application Submittal See Fee Schedule 01-550-01-551 Publications/Notices See Fee Schedule. 1 01-550-02-551 24" x')6" Blue Line $ 5.00 01-550-04-551 24" x 36" Mylar Copy $ 6.00 01-550-04-551 Single Zoning Map $ 2.00 01-550-04-551 Set of Zoning Maps $20.00 01-550-04-551 11" x 17" Color Map $ 5.00 01-550-04-551 Comp. Plan Maps $ 5.00 ea. 01-550-04-551 Comp. Plan Book w/Map $25.00 01-550-04-551 Fruitdale Valley Master Plan $ 2.50 01-550-04-551 Subdivision Regulations $ 4.50 01-550-04-551 Zoning Ordinance $15.00 (does not include annual updates) 01-550-04-551 Copies $.25/page 01-550-04-551 Copy of Meeting Tapes $25.00/tape 01-550-04-551 Miscellaneous: 01-550-04-551 TOTAL COST: `lc) , e Ap1wning\forms\invo ice