Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
WA-09-01
mods City of ~Wheat~idge 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 303.235.2846 Fax: 303.235.2857 Approval of Variance WHEREAS, an application for a variance was submitted for the property located at 6665 West 31St Avenue referenced as Case No. WA-09-O1/Consanten; and WHEREAS, City staff found basis for approval of the variance, relying on criteria listed in Section 26-115 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws and on information submitted in the case file; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has properly notified pursuant to Section 26-109 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws; and WHEREAS, there were no registered objections regarding the application; NOW THEREFORE, be it hereby resolved that a 152 square foot size variance for a detached garage; increased from the 1,000 square foot maximum to 1,152 square feet (Case No. WA-09- Ol/Constanten) is granted for the property located at 6665 West 31St Avenue to construct a detached garage, as described, based on the following findings of fact: 1. The applicant is proposing to invest a substantial amount into the property. 2. There will be no negative impact to the public welfare or other properties in the area. 3. The request would not substantially increase the congestion in public streets, increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety. 4. There have been no protests submitted during the ten-day public notification period. 5. The variance would not alter the character of the neighborhood. With the following conditions: 1. The design and architecture of the proposed garage be similar in character to the existing house, subject to staff review and approval through review of a building permit. 2. If any porton f the of the new driveway extends into the area in front of the line 25 fopl line at Iequires paving, it must be paved prior to Certificated of Occupancy. Date Director ~~4~ ® City of Wh6at.1<i!jge CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO: Case File DATE: April 27, 2009 CASE MANAGER: Adam Tietz CASE NO. & NAME: WA-09-O1/Costanten ACTION REQUESTED: Request approval for a 152 square foot variance to the 1,000 square foot maximum for a detached garage on property zoned Residential-Two (R-2). LOCATION OF REQUEST: 6665 W. 315` Avenue APPLICANT (S): Michael Costanten OWNER (S): Michael Costanten APPROXIMATE AREA: 21,600 square feet (.49 acre) PRESENT ZONING: Residential-Two (R-2) PRESENT LAND USE: Single Family Residential ENTER INTO RECORD: (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) ZONING ORDINANCE Case No. WA-09-01 Costanten All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, an administrative decision may be made. 1. REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a 152 square foot size variance to the 1,000 square foot maximum size limit for a detached garage at the address indicated above (Exhibit 1; Le*t 'of Re uest).. The request will result in the construction of a 1,152 square foot detached garage. Section 26-115.C (Variances and Waivers) of the Wheat Ridge City Code allows the Director of Community Development (Director) to grant administrative variances from the strict application of the zoning district development standards. Administrative variances are allowed for up to 50% of the development standard. if. CASE ANLYSIS The property is zoned R-2 which allows for single family and two family dwelling units as well as detached garages, sheds and other ancillary buildings. These development standards were established to provide high quality, safe, quiet and stable low to moderate density residential neighborhoods, and to prohibit activities of any nature which are incompatible with these residential characteristics. The existing home has frontage along W. 31" Ave. The lot is 135 feet wide and approximately 160 feet deep. The front portion of the property is fairly uneven and slopes both from west to east and also from south to north while the rear portion of the lot is relatively flat (I zQbits 24Site P*60,s)'. The garage is proposed to be constructed on the rear portion of the property so minimal grading will be required. It will be 11 feet from both the rear and east property line and will be approximately 13 feet high at the mid-roof (Exhibits 5 and 6,.Site"Plan and ConstrucY:on:Elevgjions). The R-2 zone district allows for forty (40) percent maximum building coverage. The site contains a 2,150 square foot home with an attached two car garage and a 192 square foot storage shed making the lot coverage 10.8 percent. The proposed garage will be constructed in the northeast corner of the lot and will be 1,152 square feet in size. The construction of the garage will increase the lot coverage from 10.8 percent to 16.2 percent. The proposed garage meets all other development standards. The property is oversized for the R-2 zone district but fairly common for the neighborhood as many of the homes are on large lots. The lot size is approximately 21,600 square feet. The minimum lot size for a single family home the R-2 zone district is 9,000 square feet, while duplexes require 12,500 square feet. The R-2 zone district allows for any unit, whether it is a two or single family dwelling unit, to have a detached garage of 1,000 square feet each. As the lot is, it is able to accommodate a duplex because of its size. If a duplex were located on the lot, each unit would be allowed a 1,000 square foot garage resulting in a Administrative Variance Case No. WA-09-01 Costanten 2,000 square foot garage. Because the size of the lot is so large, it is also large enough to be subdivided into two (2) new lots. One lot would be able to accommodate a duplex while the other would have the ability to accommodate a single family home. If a subdivision were to occur, the two new lots would allow for each unit to have a 1,000 square foot garage. This could result in 3,000 combined square feet of garage space being constructed on the same amount of land. Based on the Jefferson County Assessor's records, there appears to be multiple detached garages in the area that are near or exceed the 1,000 square foot limitation. (Exhibits 7- 11; Aerial-and site photos). There is no record of variances being requested for any of the garages that exceed 1,000 square feet in the area. It is unclear how these garages were constructed with no variance requests. It is assumed that the garages were constructed prior to the current zoning code adopted in 2001. The previous code allowed property owners to combine the square footage for all accessory buildings allowed in order to construct one larger structure. The proposed detached garage will utilize a portion of the existing concrete driveway to access the new garage from W. 31St Ave. A new driveway of crushed road base will be used to access the garage as it stems from the main driveway to the rear portion of the property. Driveway paving regulations require all driveways must be paved for the first 25 feet onto the property from the property line. It doesn't appear as if any of the road base driveway will extend into this area. The applicant has expressed the proposed garage will be built of quality construction and will match the existing home. It will be consistent with the existing home using the same siding, shingles and other materials. III. VARIANCE CRITERIA In order to authorize an administrative variance, the Director must determine that the majority of the "criteria for review" listed in Section 26-115.C.4 of the City Code have been met. The applicant has provided their analysis of the application's compliance with the variance criteria (Exhzbzt I2). Staff provides the following review and analysis of the variance criteria. 1. The property in question would not yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located. If the request were denied, the property would continue to yield a reasonable return. The property currently has a single family home and a storage shed on it. They may remain in this manner regardless of the outcome of the variance request. If denied, the applicant could still construct a detached garage on the lot but it would have to meet the 1,000 square foot size limitation. Administrative Variance Case No. WA-09-01 Costanten Staff finds this criterion has not been met. 2. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. If the request were granted, the character of the locality would most likely not be altered. The property is located in a residential area where the homes have large lots and there are several garages that exceed or are near the 1,000 square foot size limitation. In addition, the increase of 152 square feet to the maximum garage size will have a minimal impact on a lot that is more then double the minimum size for a single family home in the R-2 zone district. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 3. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property with this application, which would not be possible without the variance. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property. If the applicant was not asking for a variance to the maximum size for a garage they physically still would be able to construct a detached garage on the lot that meets the size requirement. Without the variance, the applicant may be forced to store vehicles and tools outdoors, which is the reason the variance is being requested. Staff finds that this criterion has been met. 4. The particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved results in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out. The lot is a fairly large parcel that is square in shape and has a unique topography. It slopes from west to east and south to north on the front portion of the property while it remains relatively flat on the rear portion of the property. The garage will be constructed on the rear portion of the lot where the topography, shape or physical condition of the lot does not create a hardship. Staff finds this criterion has not been met. 5. The alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. The hardship described above relates to the topography and shape of the property. Typically the topography and the shape of a property have a role in the justification for a variance to the setback requirements. The topography and shape of the property in this case have no bearing on the nature of this request.. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. Administrative Variance 4 Case No. WA-09-01 Costanten 6. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located, by, among other things, substantially or permanently impairing the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or substantially diminishing or impairing property values within the neighborhood. Staff concludes that the request would not be detrimental to public welfare and would not be injurious to neighboring property or improvements. It may have a positive impact on property values in the area. It would not hinder or impair the development of the adjacent properties. The adequate supply of air and light would not be compromised as a result of this request. The request would not increase the congestion in the streets, nor would it increase the danger of fire. It also wouldn't cause an obstruction to motorists on the adjacent streets and would not impede the sight distance triangle. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 7. The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are present in the neighborhood and are not unique to the property. There are unique circumstances in the neighborhood that necessitate the request for a variance. The properties and homes in the vicinity are similar to the subject site. The majority of properties are very large with several that have garages over 1,000 square feet. There are several other properties that do not have garages that exceed 1,000 but have multiple outbuildings or garages that are very near the size limit. The granting of the variance would not make this property unique in the neighborhood. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 8. Granting of the variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities. Single family homes and their accessory structures are not required to meet building codes pertaining to the accommodation of persons with disabilities. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. 9. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual. Administrative Variance Case No. WA-09-01 Costanten The Architectural and Site Design Manual does not apply to single and two family dwelling units. It should be noted that any building over 120 square feet in any zone district is not permitted to be metal. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. IV. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Having found the application in compliance with the majority of the applicable review criteria, staff recommends approval of the variance request. Staff has found that there are unique circumstances attributed to this request that would warrant approval of a variance. Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL for the following reasons: 1. The applicant is proposing to invest a substantial amount into the property. 2. There will be no negative impact to the public welfare or other properties in the area. 3. The request would not substantially increase the congestion in public streets, increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety. 4. There have been no protests submitted during the ten-day public notification period. 5. The variance would not alter the character of the neighborhood. With the following conditions: 1. The design and architecture of the proposed garage be similar in character to the existing house, subject to staff review and approval through review of a building permit. 2. If any portion of the of the new driveway extends into the area in front of the line 25 foot line that requires paving, it must be paved prior to Certificated of Occupancy. Administrative Variance Case No. WA-09-01 Costanten Letter of Intent 03/24/2009 I Michael J. Costanten wish to erect a garage on my property at 6665 West 31" Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO. for car and tool storage. The proposed garage will be 1152 square feet. My property is just shy of Y2 acre. I believe it would be an asset to the neighborhood and the Wheat Ridge community. By storing my vehicles inside it may also reduce theft and or vandalism. The garage will be constructed to look much the same as the house, which will help it to blend with the existing construction. At least three of my neighbors also have garages over 1000 square feet. Presently this area of my property is an unused field. Michael J. Costanten k zzl- N. N. ry- r N c.ea Case No. WA-09-01 Costanten ti a Administrative Variance Case No. WA-09-01 Costanten o n i I , I I ~ 25,4' ~ PROPOSED FiARAGG II I 47._6. o i 1~ I1.0` I PROF05ED DRIVEWAY I HITH 4" THtGK r,00C.RE TF SLAB ON NRADE w - + FAIEMN5 HOME 2150 5. DARE Fl. " PROP05ED DRIVEHAY ! . EX161 M, SHED 112 501JARE F1 PROPOSED 6ARA5E = 1152 SQUARE PT. Wk"fH b" ROADBASE 1 t I Q I C7 J T---- I 1 p \ f I \ a I I \ l I EXI5TIPt5 HOME ~ O I \ EXtSTfNO \ DPI VEAAT ~ - - _ - -J \ I M PdRGH \ I ~ L t I , 25 GColoS~. wesi D15, r Vcnuc 5~_T~F?LAN or wJ k zz- N. nA Administrative Variance 10 Case No. WA-09-01 Costanten Exhibit 6 z a 8 d• } § `e & ftN iy99~ ~~C4 el r a m al ~v wµ `tl .r I` 2Pf r 9e to s `L'~ M1 q) SI 9 ¢ UI 9 i d x A r 4 I gl A 5 1 m .MNLMI IV'JX V+a[FL iCYELL~IVx ~'IYM OVi-N nYN N V 0 O > 1 z Exhibit 7 N 'O v O G O k w C C 6 ti O C C C O v^ G C ~ U U CC Oi v~ ~ o x n IC Administrative Variance 13 Case No. WA-09-01 Costanten 0 Z Case No. WA-09-01 Costanten Administrative Variance 14 03/31/2009 Responses for Variance Review Criteria 6665 W. 315` Ave Wheat Ridge, CO A. I purchased the property in 2007 mostly due to the oversize lot. I need a large storage area to house my car collection. I also have a vast amount of tools and spare parts that also require storage space. 8. The extra space would not alter the character of the neighborhood. There are four other oversize garages within sight of my driveway. The construction will blend well with existing buildings on the properly. C. I plan to invest $20,000 plus in improvements to the k property. The garage, driveway and landscaping. The improvements will help to maintain the look of Wheat Ridge as a desirable place to live and raise a family. I have already invested over $700 in plans for the garage. D. The property is large enough to include an oversize garage without looking cramped. Currently this portion of the property is just an unused weed field. Without the extra 150 sq. ft. of garage space I will not have the space needed to house all my belongings inside a building. E. Persons with Interest in the property have not caused any hardship to the property or the neighborhood. 1 Administrative Variance 15 Case No. WA-09-01 Costanten F. The granting of the variance will not in any way cause street congestion or impair or diminish the property or any adjacent properties. The added building will not only improve the property greatly, but will add value to the neighborhood. G. As said before there are four other oversize garages within sight of my driveway. The neighborhood is unique in that almost all the properties have larger lots than normal neighborhoods. An oversized garage will only add value to the property and the entire neighborhood. H. N/A 1. N/A Finally, I would like to add that I have resided in Wheat Ridge almost 50 years. It is a great place to iivel I am only asking for 150 square feet of extra space. It would help me a great deal to have this variance passed. if you have any questions please feel free to contact me. 303-638-8617 or mcostanten@msn.com 0 Cordially, ZI Michael J. Costanten Enclosures: Pictures of other oversized garages within view of my property. Administrative Variance 16 Case No. WA-09-01 Costanten sped ~r City of Wheatf<idge POSTING CERTIFICATION CASE NO. WA-09-01/Constanten DEADLINE FOR WRITTEN COMMENTS: April 20, 2009 I M ICM 1 L J77 G yS T,9 ~~E~ _ (name) residingat W, 3157-,11r W14194'f246Ci G© e621Z (address) as the applicant for Case No. WA-08-05/Coleman, hereby certify that I have posted the sign for Public Notice at _ 661,S- Ly , 31 S'~ d~ c.146*7 ✓2 ,,P6e. Co cS'o 2 /y (location) on this 'I Ol ay of k /°2 L , 20 o , and do hereby certify that said sign has been posted and remained in place for ten (10) days prior to and including the deadline for written comments regarding this case. The sign was posted in the position shown on the map below. Signature:,y NOTE: This form must be submitted to the Community Development Department for this case MADRID MICHAEL MADRID BRENDA 6640 W 32ND AVE WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 COSTANTEN MICHEALJ 6665 W 31ST AVE WHEAT RIDGE CO 80214 TANNER WILLIAM P 6705 W 31ST AVE WHEAT RIDGE CO 80214 LUTREY MICHAEL G LUTREY BARBARA A 6625 W 31 ST AVE WHEAT RIDGE CO 80214 WESELOH GLEN M WESELOH TINA E 6730 W 31ST AVE WHEAT RIDGE CO 80214 8031 HUGHES WARREN R 6630 W 31ST AVE WHEAT RIDGE CO 80214 39-253-08-004 39-253-08-014 39-253-08-013 39-253-08-015 39-253-09-004 39-253-09-003 7008 3230 0003 5514 6874 7008 3230 0003 5514 6867 7008 3230 0003 5514 6850 7008 3230 0003 5514 6843 7008 3230 0003 5514 6836 Q~pC CO A4R'g co USP`' 7008 3230 0003 5514 6829 eRi1( City of Wheat~dge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 291h Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 CERTIFIED LETTER NOTICE April 9, 2009 Dear Property Owner: This is to inform you of Case No. WA-09701, a request for an administrative variance of 152 square feet to the 1,000 square foot maximum allowed for a detached garage on property zoned Residential-Two (R-2) and located at 6665 W. 31" Avenue. The applicant for this case is requesting an administrative variance review which allows no more than a fifty percent (50%) variance to be granted by the Zoning Administrator without need for a public hearing. Prior to the rendering of a decision, all adjacent property owners are required to be notified of the request by certified mail. If you have any questions, please contact the Planning Division at 303-235-2846 or if you would like to submit comments concerning this request, please do so in writing by 5:00 p.m. on April 20, 2009. Thank you. WA0901.doc www.ci.wheatridge.co.us J' l el el n UB 8 W 31ST AVE 3195 o m ml~ 31[5 q MIN SU gi K 31]5 N 31]595 91 3165 5 ~ 8. CL~ n 9 W 30TH AVE N STITE5 PARK 2 a _2 2n FIRSTSPANISH A55EM15LY OF GO p club a a $ W 29TH AVE Ir_ $ Im Z W ~ ~ W F O Q Z I Z 3 ~ MM00. s(17'~-- NW 25 L^ I a a I m el ^I I ml ..,I e e; h71~;o<so H R L . a z L N N } ] 3 OFFICIAL ZONING MAP O SW 25 (D SIG NA TES OWNERSHIP) c WHEAT RIDGE - WATER FEATURE COLORADO ` DENOTES MULTIPLE ADDRESSES 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN o 100 200 s00 400 fla (APPROXIMATE LOCATION) ~]9 Om DEPARTMENTOF MAP ADOPTED: June 15,1994 O pp PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Last Revision: September 10, 2001 e l al~x Im' m ~ n LL1 d -l ~ R R a ~ A ~m ~ w L m' ~ 8 EDGEWATER It O O O M O m N 00 U ~ rn O O O ;,,;I Q 0 Q ~ Q M 0 W co O c W Vl ~ c: J M N Q m O Q O] O M 0 O_ O O O U (6 O O V Residential Worksheet Address: (ppfLt(/~~ N V~ Zoning: (1~ Z Property in the flood plain? Lot Size: 21 sq. ft. Lot Width: 3 5~ ft. Maximum Lot Coverage: (v % sq. ft. Proposed Improvements: House: Addition to House: Existin rovement(s): sq. ft. House:. sq. ft. sq. ft. Shed: %z sq. ft. Shed: sq. ft. Detached Garage: ~sq. ft. Proposed Lot Coverage: (Total) % Detached Garage: Other: sq. ft. 3, ~q q. ft. sq. ft. Required Setbacks: FR 30 Provided Setbacks: FR Z Z' Maximum Height: ft. Proposed Height: z ft. SJL9 S R S S _R Maximum Size: 14pO& sq. ft. Proposed Size: sq. ft. Access Notes For one and two-family dwellings, the first 25' of driveway area from the existing edge of pavement into the site shall be surfaced with concrete, asphalt, brick pavers or similar materials. For all uses other than one and two family dwellings, no vehicle entrances or exits may be closer than 25' to any property line, except when used as joint access for two or more lots. In residential zone districts, curb cuts shall be at least 10 feet and not more than 24 feet in width. One and two-family dwellings may have horseshoe driveways, provided that the street accesses are at least 30 feet apart, measured from the interior edges. For all uses, one access point per property is permitted. Landscaping Notes For one-and two-family dwellings, one tree for every 70 feet of street frontage is required. 100% of the front yard and 25% of the entire lot must be landscaped prior to issuance of C.O. Street trees required: Street trees provided: S,RK,LRAL N,I REFERENCE: 20031NRRM IONPL RESIOENXAL LpOE MINX AMENDMENT PER TX, LWAL BIILDINS OEFARRfET 1A11N6 -NRI50111q 01, THIS PROJECT. .A MO, 1. PEENED FNTAnYE THIS FOJNOATIqu DESIGN IS BAirJ UPON THE AzyMPTION A ARE CORRECT TM T THE S.Y+i ORTINS SOIL IS CMA9LE OF PRO TIES µ N-LOw<BLE B[ARIIIS cAPALItt ~ 1500 psf. 5 A.SBMPTIOX yNLL BE vELEEp BY Lc THE pFy6N EN~INEFRIXS FIRM OF'MALPIFF EYaINEERIUb' OR BY A WµIFIEp EIK F££R HO SHALL RESPONp IN HRITEII FORy TO'MPLOJFF EIKINEERIN4' SipiINS THESE ASSrTNnIXG , F I SHALL BE RPCEp M l"N"YRB®'0' ,1F SOIL NIOER mE FN' TIXSS HAS, BEEN OISNRBED REMOVE ALL LOO SAIL PRIOR TO RA41N5 ldCRETE IN THE FORMS. GOKRESSI N6ThI OF '/J00 31 AF R AOF EB DAYS. LEMENi IX (gNLFEIE TU~ 15IN CONTACT H~SOAL~SHALL BE ttFE II OR ttPE II MwIFIEp. g9M1H YUM+OF fgNLRETE AW1 BE 9- IX PER CUBIC Y~ OF ~NORETC~SWLL' i BE Ap~NAT~TSHB 61T~E ~wT WTI ME ~ ~NE E~1~NE~E2 IF M" E C/JNTENT LEVEL IN THE SOIL EYCfl6 O.I% ITT II I ODED CETfrNT SHALL BE If 1. ttFE I FIEp CE10rt SWLLL FF£T BYAFIGnOry A5T.1 C ISO AND SHALL CONTAIN 20 PEFCBn FLY pSH. TIE RT A41 DK1f~B MEET A5M c 6 10 ~ F REdIREMETS I. E MAAMBM WATER-111ENT RATIO SHALL BE 045 HITH AIR ENTRAINMENT BETWEEN 5 ANO I TERCET. INFORCINS STEEL BARS STALL cONlORM i0 ASTM AlEN ERARE 420. PROTECTION FOR REINFORCING cGLRE1 SHALL BE IN AC! pANMB WIT IBC SECTION 1111 RE.-ORCINS E, SN, BE COATI. pA01Np CORNERS, MA. SA NIM)M BETE FOR EXTERIG¢. FLATHORK SNµy pEVaOF 9, P51 ZOMERE`f VE STREIGTN IN 26 RATE. NAVE R P IS ENTRAINMENT BETS£N % aLRER LIN TILNIE MINES cONF MIN, FLY ADN ANO ~POZ IT11' 20. ARE3' um IY FTABLE AS CONS AS Y MEET THE 3500 MP STRENGTH. "JITTERS RE. AMINO RP4pENT 16 NT AN, MHE0E0~ O THE FMEOFpwTOry µgLN LL FO TBRIOR ANO EKLE.10P SUBS. AEMJ1ABON OF SPRAY MEMBRANE ORINS OOMROIW AT A RATE OF 10 MORE THAN E,, SF. PER GN10N AFTER PHISHINS IS 5~ rv6LY RKIXMEHOO "'I BE' HARE PERIMETER EKPANSION LONTMSFBETTSEEN S~ AND AND LIABILITY FOHOED µ ELI, PTUR~E BpNio°sE To coilcxLE"i ~ISUgz-pM{RApE BIN ASERME IF EFREBI noH of THE sues AOHHERES TO ALL e+6wEER1x6 RFC,MI.1EHHOgnon's .w0 RESIGNS. HAWSER.. 6. ALL WTBER yuyl BE HEM-FIR GRADE O E OR EETTE( WITH A BASE HIM. ALLOYNHLE EIOREME IRP SENBRE "'B'S FOR MEMBERS HAS) I BSO ES E%LLWIHI wpJ15TMDNI 1. FOR USE, SIZE LOAR TON ENNROMRl1T ETC. LMLL`-- OHHEPROF NOTED ALL LMIBER IN DONTALT BLOT POOORETE SHALL BE M" TREATER TO ORO PLF, STWS SHALL BE STµpARp 6RABD OR BETTS, 1. E(W µyOWABL IFRM "LN-' REFERZZOTAL yHEg TO HPM=A- VENEEDO WI.BER .11 AN ALLDMAELE BENDING STREES OF 2650 AND THE HgRIR 1285 P51. OPBH I W TO a W pE SHALL HAVE (I)-TRIMMER OPEHBES SREATER THVwNI SNAIL HAVE TOE HIRE SHALL HAVE 11-ITAIARS ARE EO-NINA SBl, (jI 6 Rz AN, (31-KING SNRS. B. EPEE-EPANEERED RN' F TWKfLS y - BE CEDER EFE 1151NI THE FOLLOM NS LAAO CRITERIA, A. THE TOP CHORD SHALL HE IDEABB TO wPPORT A UNIFORM LIVE LOAR OF 30I ANTE A UNIFORM OEM LOAB OF lO 3F. B. ME BOTTOM IHORB SHALL BE BESIENEp TO 5)FPORT A UNIFORM LIVE LOAp OF 10I AMP A IMIFORM LBEEO EAM OFBE AH OF FROM THE BE O CIgRp~ ANB TOP LIORO IS LESS THAN I IN, 1 10 CLEANAREF EST PE LOAF PAT l"'FRO c. TM ELI EN61NFHt SHALL REVIEM ALL TRUSS RRAWIN65 11IO2 TO FABRIGTON OF mll55E5, GENERAL, WHO- AMINE ARgMO THE ENTIRE FOJNRATION SHALL IIYAIIDE A Sb' MIRE STRAP OE INERT S,ZI AS RCLK OR BARK AHO IRR16AlHIXH yIpLL BE OE516NER 6O AS Npi TO RIS' WR6E wgTER ON iHZ STRIP. THE SLOPE OF Tff 6ROUNp gF+FgCE ANp pyENAE LPNOS:MIN6INLL Mffi THE SPFLIF RATIONS OEZORT. IN OZLO.O GEOLO616AL .RI, SPEGI PRIMEATION NO M ENNT£O HOME LAIC APING AND MAINTENANCE ON ° LLINS SI IMLE%TE RAIL REPORT CONTAINS MORE 5TRIHSENT RERBREMENTS. lR. ALL BIMENSIOxs SWJWN ON SRNI DRAAIN65 ARE BAFEB ON OIMENDONB AND INFORMATION FR I ® BY ARIN TEZTS, LOOFRALTORS, OR OTHERS PNO ARE IRTENOEB To LOCATE SIRWT,AL HENS RELATI TO NDN-zTELONRAL cOMPONETS THE DESIGN ENGINEER M15T BE NOTIFIEI IN THERE IMPI pEN 5 WHI MIAGXi BE PFFFCTEO BY LOLATIpAI GIPNBES N ONO MME µ THETOESIGN E4MEER HE RESPOICSIBLF FOR ME 11HATE PRE615E L.O. OB RAIMENT OF ANY COMFONEHT. 11 E OWRR ANA HIS FORM ION OERTiA,,OR TL IRIMY MAT ALL OIMEI151ON5 ARE CORRECT ANO THAT THE FOHNOATON FITS THE NEPI HARASS THAT IS SITU ON TOP OF THE FOLOT ATOM P R O F L T 0ES16N LOA, VALUES.. S I ROOF AW OEILINbi MINE, EEISYIC. 680.99 SN EH = SO ~ ILLAWND EMBED - IOO• IMPORgAHLE 1., = 11 ROOF HO. = cE FACTOR . I,O RWF BEAR N PORTAHCE FACTOR = I.O 5 = Ib SITE LLA55 O ELIN6 OEPO = 5 SEISMIC OE51HH OAI 11 B THE BP SIC WIN TTVESyNE 15 HI ON A 5-SELONO y5T HIND SPEED OF TOO MILES PER LM HR ANO BOI NOT AE T, EmOTI1RE, 5RT FACTOR, OR FREPRRE COEEFIOIEHTS NE BASIL HIM, PRES,RE, ALOE HAS MJISTETJ BY THESE COEFFICIENTS ARM E%PONRNS'C' FMTORS FOR OETER41NIN5 THE WINO LOAD BE516N VARE, FOR "I PRO¢LT. "I WALLS. A. BLWK ENO EWES OF WALL SHEATHINS ON GARAGE WALLS ANO WJ.L5 E EEPHIS 10 IN HIEIHXT, BM L WITH OR NAILS Ai 6' LC. A TME EWES - l'" IN THE FIELD OR OS£ 16.1 STARES AT I- OC. AT THE EWES ANO B' c1. IX ME FIELD, B, OVERNEA, 6AMASS OOOM MALL SHALL HAVE PF L LILT IN 'T' µ0 • ' HATES AROJ.D THE 00085. L. ALL HEADERS SHALL BE HELB TIHHT TO THE TOP pUiE, O EMERIOR DORMERS 5HµL BE NAILED WITH A MININVM OF I Ru, NAILS AT IS CO. . IT. BE STEAM FB AT EALM ENO TO THE TOP ELATE INEIRE OF THE WALL. F 5 UDLUNAL BEARINS TO NT5 SHALL BE OF BO O1 OR 6RE TER B. AN TO, 6 wALLTMS4EATHl ME AR SE VI6' 058 ATTALXEpTW 1 SH HAILS AT R AT ALL EgSEZ ARB 12' OO. M THE THUD OR 111x- % IB SASE STARES AT 5. OL. AT EWES ANO B' O.L. EIOB. ROOF. XSTALL ALL TR,55 SEPOE5 AS ED, FI PROFILE PRO, TO SHEATHINH ROOF. "OlEKINO SHOJLB BE APE AT EVERY PORNER AND ETTOA EVEYRIHEE,ETNOF AAII lTE XN RTC 5NL ATE NO ETH TO B E NAILS1E WITH a IHB L, THORNTEMA, OT M5 ARE NESTER AT FACT ENO OF EVERT BIRDER HRL55. D. RE5 CLIPS ANOLO BE ALTPfNTEN LET AN0 RIGHT AT EVERY E IF n BEARIN6.1 ARE PRAMEO AT 24. 0, THE T,,A, ,IT SEAR WITHIN s OF THE DI . FBnSME, CENTER To cExrER F. INSTALL 09' ROOF VETS PER BOO SHAME EEFT_ VENTS . HARIDOOLB BE TA 9HHILL RE ORP ODHN FROM OSB AMEEAHTTXi1EiI6S 11 6 OF IH. 1HEO WITH B7 BASE ETAMp EElI 3'BO', P ONNES `A.THE, G INDUCTS AEBLEE, x 16 NAILIA, NNW ALL E% OR DESPOERS WILL BE NAILEO .1 A HI MMM OF 2180 AT ALL T-TEPDERZ `wi- BE ITST A5 F«Lw. , 2x4 Dv - IBB RAILS AT IF, c. lNE OR -160 NAILS AT 16'11. 2x80)-ATE NAILS AT 14' O, 2%lo (U - 16O NAILS AT 16'11, A - INO HALE AT IOGxl, 2XIO 9 I" LK (4) - SO NAILS AT 16'11. II TAE- LVL (5) -16p xAILS AT l6'O6 . 4- DAL OR - ISO HAILS AT 16'11. IE- LK 01- 1. WAILS AT IB'LC. S,t 11) AT KIN,"'T TO" 6EL L ARIINH POSTS SHALL SE WNLEO µ MIT, 0 A M N M,M OO E 60 AANA LS AT IM11 W TH TxO NA LS AT I I BEK p L HPNERES MEN SMPSON EFIFOATON5. FN , ,I OR LL HOLES THROYM TWS EAIES EGESSA¢Y REAR GONTI NUOUS SHALLOW FOOTING SECTION U SCALE, XOT TO y~ALE TONOG AM OF n DOOR BLOGKOUT DETAIL 5CALE NOT TO SCALE FINISHER 6RME LEVEL M1 P I § I h PROPO£p 6ARP6E 4 a k b'P E'i' i F 3 XO PROPOS D. oK WAY I CRETE e R,NI 9 S' NO INS = 2150 SHAPE Fi. M HA ST AFTER = 1F] SOUARE 11, PRIX'aJE0 FI I VEfKT IRWC 06ARASE 5(a1ARE - RE _ FT. I ROAOBASE % ( O T _T I B I I I. 1 1 a I I I I I ` I \ r-~ q Exl5nw wm1E NINTINS I T" F11.Y \ F \ ~PORON L \ I - b A ,B57 NET E n SITE PLAN I SCALE: I. 1p'q' K OINT Irz' OX I2' ANCHOR Ea5 AT. 4B' OC. STARTN6 0' 1. CORNERS. WALK-TL. lOOMl 11- FROM OVERHEAD ,OOMA TO, I qM,TIOX OR . 3 GAR GARAGE EABYRH1RAOE HAS NOT BEEN EN61N6EER THE FOLLNULNRAL MEOPHAT ON 19 BAS ON INOATRY STAXBAROS. 4- THICK R HANRAL HO' LL O5t PPROFEE11 VIE H14. ANOII S.- DEEP 6 HL4 % Uli-JOINS AT 121' OC. MAXJ EACH MAY SLOPE FLOOR 5- MINIM, }LDOrWS AT EAGH ENO OF OO\HERRFBAO DOOMS, 11" MIN FROM EI16E OF DOOR RE I AOR FROM ENT OF WALL TO .OF STRAP (TTPILAU / F,RM,MFOO12- / ANO SLAB 4 PTOP OR n FOUNDATION PLAN I scALa v4' , r-o• I NSPEGTI ON5 NOTE: IF MSPECTIONS ARE TO BE FERFORMFD Br THE ENGINEER THE, MJST RE RECUESiEv ALL DIMENSIONS MUST BE A MINIMN4 OF 24 HOURS IN ApVANCE, VERIFIED WITH ARGHTEGTURAL ALL WORK M115T SE COMPLETE AND SATISFACTORY AT TIME OF INSPECTION. IF T PLeTEp PER LOCAL LOOPS AND RETAILS N1111O IN PLANS AND FIELD VERIFIED CAWDRK I5 NONST=OrICOMDRAIi1NG5, THE INSPECTION WILL FAIL AND MAST BE RE-SLHEDHLED. THE CONTRACTOR OR A MALIFIEO REPRESENTATIVE PVST BE ERESENT OIRIN6 THE 1NST£CTON, ALL NOTES AND DETAIL5 SHALL BE REVIEWED BY THE OWNER AND HIS CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO 5IBMITTIN6 FOR A BUILDING PERMIT. SUBMITTING OF THESE DRAWINGS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT CONSTITUTES ACCEPTANCE AND APPROVAL BY THE OWNER AND INDICATES ALL NOTES, DETAILS, AND DIMENSIONS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED. SPECIAL NOTE THE REIN DAI 51EL I"D5TR1 HAS 6HAN6Ep THE DE516NATON ON THEIR REINFORCING STEEL EARS A5 FOLLOWS. OLD PDRAHATON NEW AE IONATON ERAOE GRADE 40 GRADE 300 ORME INI 60 SRADE 420 512E N0.3 NO. 10 SIZE NO 4 NO. 13 SIZE N0 5 NO I6 SIZE NO .6 N0. IN SIZE NI T NO, EE FREE TOM HE ANT, . TXROJON SLAB °anA00 FfClgtf, R ioa g ¢e31~pC' _ `aEIL' NAl C\\~`iw O YHaeA ` m1s' 4704 Hadan Street, Suite 330 Denver, CO 80212 (303) 423-8982 CLIENT: MIKE COSTANTEN NEW OARA6E AT 6665 WE5T 515T AVENUE, WHEATRIDGE, GO SGALE AS SHOWN _ _TDATE: 12/5/OH DRAWN 8Y SEM NOTES DTL5, FND., SITE ENGINEERS_JOB p :6951 rSFEET: I OF 2 .-HO iRµ5VERSE REBAR IS REANINF0 FOR HOORAY' LESS I HROO, FOR 1-6- KI µ0 6REATERFEE xl3 BEHAR A ~ LANDSCAPE DETAIL `I/ 'y~ALE: NOi TO SCALE T2B ~ w TOO, ' N D .FNNA, d 42 _ NY m0 m~ x$ m~ L m m 6 o ro o•,ERNEAD 16 6' BO AO 6 A RASE woR AR ASe ooR 1AR i~sE D,,R Yd V! 0d Yi' tid' Yd' gd' Yd V! QFLOOR PLAN "'III w snFSa+xY +0'oFENINS 30 0 IGNIE PES AT F51-2%IO IffPGER (3J-]xl0 HEADER IN (I(H--KIIRll'IMER WT1 n1-TRIMMER EP4x RA£Tdt 'O'E BEARING yy5 ANO x SPA AND (~1-KI SND 30 ^oPalllas fil-]%IO HEADER A WM MRNOMER SND T ElI NINAGM END I I l I I I - - ~ I : I I I I I 1 I I II 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I m 1 L__ - - - - - - I x o 2 m'e~a (31NNi IN, AD, ( Ol 9-iRIMIrtRs roamlwumPl w rn-KINS s AT EP[H FND q~i^i'd'a n~Nw ne'i~2 rcy~ $°p=Y ;o e /3l SOUTH ELEVATION ~l SLALE: I0. = I'-O' 'Gf I. (3}N VB' 6'9'OFFA'ITO 11 HEADER WITH (e-2x10 HEADER (31-TRIMMERS . .1. rn-TRIMMERS SI INS S AT EACH AHO (n-KING 1rv°5 DM, T eV, ENO ROOF PI ~ ~ INSPEGTION5 NOTE: TIO ARE BE PERFORMED BY THE ENGINEER THEY M15T BE REGlE5TE0 11 MINI ALL DIMENSIONS MUST BE A A MINIMUM OF F 24 HOUR R IN ADVANCE. VERIFIED WITH ARCHITECTURAL ALL WORK MJST BE C -M - AND 5ATIEFAGTORY AT TIME OF IN5PECTION. IF PLAN5 AND FIELD VERIFIED LAND 15 NOT COMPLETED PER LOOAL CODE5 AND DETAILS INDICATED IN ' C/JNSTILICTON URA wN65, THE INSPECTON WILL FAIL AND BUST eE RE-SCHEDULED. IF CONTRACTOR OR A pUALIFIED REERESENTATIl MNST BE PRESENT DURINS TIE INSPECTION. ALL NOTES AND DETAILS SHALL BE REVIEWED BY THE OWNER AND HIS CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO SUBMITTING FOR A BUILDING PERMIT. WBMITTMG OF THESE DRAWINGS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT GONSTITUTE5 AGGEPTANGE AND APPROVAL BY THE OWNER AND INDI6ATE5 ALL NOTES, DETAILS, AND DIMENSIONS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED. 2 scu z Al ' FeeD IMI, AT_ -IN 314. ON .1. O~ 35 TE A RA=Rx~L~ T NMFO 6 a. nIRAGERaOFEL=N2=5,a. i0 n ENTER I MAULS M- TAR O y S gAT11NS WITI ONR uP sIDING TOF~ DN FOJMnrlox EER FLAN sRADE EL. = ac-a n BUILDING SECTION 2 ~a 03/4= RAeF AM EL - 112-5 314' mm uF slDlNs ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ TRIM AT ~E °ooRS ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ NO wNDw.s mEi' 0 0 0 00 00 IN I n WEST ELEVATION 4TH«wrrRETE UI SCALE 1/4' m -D _ o /0 i L: a'+p'~fpaS x¢((31)08 'F 9EC^msl~ SPEGIAL NOTE THE REINFORCING STEEL INWSTRY HAS CHANGED THE pE51GNATION ON THEIR REINFORCING STSSL BARS AS FOLLOWS: OLD DESIGNATION NEW DESIGNATION GRADE SRADE 40 GRADE 3OO GRADE GRADE 60 GRADE 420 SIZE N0.3 NO. 10 SIZE N0.4 N0. le SIZE . S NO. 16 512E NO. 6 NO, N9 SIZE NO" N0. 22 1" I V IQRJI.dII l i 4704 Harlan Street, Suite 330 Denver, CO 80212 (303) 423-8982 CMENL MIKE C05TANTEN NEW GARAGE AT: 6665 WEST 515T AVENUE, WHEATRIDGE GO SCALE: AS SHOWN DATE 12/5/05 DRAWN BY: 5EM ' ROOF, SECTION ELEV5. ENGINEER'S JOB # : 6951 i SHEET: 2 OE 2 LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION Community Development Department 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Phone (303) 235-2846 (Please print or type all information) ApplicantMic-I,Ae4 --T. COST,<w-r.O Address 66667 W. 31S7f}✓F Phone 3o3-63R-"/7 City W H ERrk 1 L)&6- State C C) Zip 90 Z / y Fax f}ve Phone 3-63r /J OwnerihlC{IA-EL -3-. Gc+SiA,V><-' Address446. - /a 31S7 - City ut e RT 2 /D6c State Co Zip k62 / yFax Contact r"7i c- k4-k:(. :5-. Ccv$Tr)NT~nI Address l%6o.. Zo• 3/S7- fhle Phone343-63dN%I? Citywk{ t qT 2 / .661f State C Q Zip S`6 Z / y Fax (The person listed as contact will be contacted to answer questions regarding this application, provide additional information when necessary, post public hearing signs, will receive a copy of the staff report prior to Public Hearing, and shall be responsible for forwarding all verbal and written communication to applicant and owner.) / G Location of request (address): G 6 S l 9 / ST Aj-,° W) T~1 J)6c. Cy O'6 2 / Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request) Application submittal requirements on reverse side ❑ Change of zone or zone conditions ❑ Special Use Permit ❑ Consolidation Plat ❑ Subdivision: Minor (5 lots or less) ❑ Flood Plain Special Exception ❑ Subdivision: Major (More than 5 lots) ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Right of Way Vacation ❑ Planned Building Group ❑ Temporary Use, Building, Sign ❑ Site Development Plan approval _CKVariance/Waiver (from Section ) ❑ Other: Detailed description of request: Z w is H Te EXCeed -IM! 1r)9X11Wu ry G4296e S / 2 C 0C IO~L) SO FT By 15L SQ. FT 7'o+Rl S/Zc. It 5? -Sk F71, Required information: Assessors Parcel Number: Size of Lot (acres or square footage): -2n Current Zoning: R Z. Proposed Zoning: [c 2 Current Use: 51^6l< Fgh/4y bt-,JeL4/A-?a Proposed Use: S/.✓9/eF.BirZi/Z I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above, without whose consent the requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners must submit power-of-attorney from the owner which approved of this action on his behalf. Signature of AeLAicant -1 y of 20~ ELIZABETH i A. FEREGA S scribed and sworn tome t5Noublic NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO My commission Expires t0/13/2009 mission expires To be filled out byystaff-G Datereceived Jli&~ Fee s boc-' Receipt No. Case No. Comp Plan Desig. Zoning e~ Z Quarter Section Map cYG[J Related Case No. Pre-App Mtg. Date Case Manager A r~r-l ~I Y" f 3 Il m o a U v 0 W Q Y Zi H z h H H o ~ m a o Y O cn R a a - O C Q ~ U R O C m v 0 N m T J U z W z El F 0 U h la W mU aL. H 0 N m m m N N m L O O b n v - L W O n m++ G m N t m u 3 C a v v a VI (y l R - L Il 'O C . ~ O C L N a u ` DI N OI L O~ N u 3 D) ] v F i v m~ a w v m a m u N N ` v > . v L z - - m L Il N > R C> B y . N O Y a+ ] V ~ N N C O) R N y -0 u< W G N N Q O O 6 R W m~ w O U G m U U > c c v a R L m o o U ro U 4 v f Il m w T U m y m D R W a C Il v b U 'q w ry C O a R V v Il L> E v Ui a .y f , G - L •p U G ro A N R U' D a u E v C C-J '-0]mG NN VCa OJUL" c R~m m o z o- b v w. V o - i v v R c m m J N U O 3 L L R R N m N ] y- W d~ a O H N Y T a+ N C 0 c C N Of m v U O u V 4 N V N C v U i p G N O O ' O T T O H 4 n N -0 m m y O C c- m E 3 'r ti R a > ~ a s J VI v o o 'O L U C A N U l C ' J c v R C N O C H c c N N N y n U 0 U N L R R C.O > N G w'O - 3 u m Q ~ O O R S Y u K v U 0 b w - 0 ' P7 - C L a+ i. ~ 0 R a / -w u m m -o m L G g A A G m o c L a+ t v v N u N N m U m m v v w > c v R R Ul w S C v R C t+ V 4 ti > y C J O m-0 Y v Y Lv- G N J u v U W N m Il O a s m w 0 m W' N 3 a A U 0 o F c R o - c W II R v G m a + c y ` C L p O R W O - O C L H y W V N v) L R a T J d v O_ J m 3 U a U G v E ? ro - N G U O_ n ` 14 n w Y d , s v W N N d C L L + o w Q - b G 4 ] o W t m W N R N U] U m y -0 ^ E C a+ i(t O N L C L U C-0' U S.' v O R W R N ~ U O- L ~ O V G W O -n Y G N~ OI b N U M N UI 2 L J m~ C .C O1 m O 3 N - R ~ O 9 G a ✓a Rv U U' -0' m N~ v m O y C 3 a W R O U a Vl Y U Ot Y Y a d d Il- m C F b~ R m v 2 O W v Y '•1 m Y m Il ma m Lb ya' G-~ v R c L v a D _ v W N ~ II R O 0 N W ~ y * W3 a a ro NC LCyN2RNw u]'L4N 3 C Rv W m> t E J N v Il O ~ p{ 7.~ V m R v G ry G R R L v o a o m v a Y 'O ry 0 R C C D m m H 11 v^ v a - J a Y u y N y L ^ C a C y G V .O4 m C C O ~ ~ a N Ol N R N 2 A N L ' m R N OI R J VI r' C L - T - R U O ~ b > ~ a O R W •C m .C d C m R N N> L N W 0 H 3 M Il W O p tt Ta W R W a'- m C OI u U v G m'O R R J a v O L N L O~ U C U U O. 3 Y V G a m G a U L C R- m 0 0 K 0 V w v 2 ~ f 'O II o c ~C R H o G Y • G L v Y e F w R` R w R N a .O 'n G C m I Y'. E - L C W t ' g rd u m a 7 R VI PQ m~ > o u w b ti o VI W L W VI O D._ u N b N N U o V p R v y v W o m- a c m w L M m- 4 N c w m a v ro - E a w w c m Il m m c w` A G u y v. v Rxm U O m y v LL a II C 3 - _ m G E R U• N L L N R W Y U y w U W - J J ro - YC o N L > N L - W I U N q M ' ' O N U C W C O N c C• a u o T R r ` L N O in O Y U w n G U v Il O- a A C U 'n p m m C X V 'J RVC F a a+V mo-L E c m CY N'UM ]X ' v • ^ • O m o O c v R v y m -w m m L N E ' U' V N ` Y W m V) N C .C T a Il C- o a H F R N O C Q v m O c v d- R m > U R R ~.q W R U ~ m L Y N N N v C -0 U Y 0 ~ a L C W U m .q N U m mn NnY avL V`LEV w 2~ L m c R v vT LN RO F F Y - EUVIOb AGUU Ca>JVON pR 5 > m o m c v d L R o v N Y m m N z L v Lo m C c N 0c q r4 O d 6 C C v- N N i y i V. LmYIR Rmo a _ a wc~ u G m Ln •a- w u E Y rA W R ~ m E a v C m 4 v U G ~ E C u w a m a c] c] a m R v m u o o Y- X V U Y -0 U G R z m J Q L C R - N -y O W O I[) ll N J L C m 3 R N N W L m m 9 K 0 JV 'G ~ a rrr 1-a b C- L L C v u Df A •O N 2 W K 1/1 L U' '2 m v N 3 W 0_ C w E m F O n L A G ~ N a N W H N C N Y„ R C- s - m c c L , Q N o L a w • O (y' U V) a . O m C y - m G Y M D, i' G J C L S c N o- F N 'm v W a ~ E W L ~ 3 E J m v 4 v- U J - m W C m m 1- ~ p C y T•^ L - c w v E 3W C 0]V NU 3 R aV~-> ' N+y. L R W O w o v N ` 3 W V N-0 m - 4 3 vi ^ b C m 3 U .O E a~ a C V H 3~ 0 c a C O C m- N - a g v 4 U a N U a N m O W QJ v ~mL W J R RN~• m.- EmU UN'aN L C C • L H V Il N W ~y C - R N X V u V N S N N 3 U y N O v v m~ m "O E O R L H O G m ~ t v- - v RC V y L LQ G L C L V m Y V 'O C U W y m~ ' mac] v 5 ~ -F v A .-RR m cv w U F S ` R O S L ~ J C m O VI p~ N 4 ~ 3 W N -Y t V1 ` N - 2 H N C U , G L N` 1] y.. x ` ~ ~ ~ Y O N N H V m H G S N c N VI t R a m z m N ¢ m m L T C v u- N m 3 4 L m N W G K U ] + v W O C O Z > ` a Y N a L > R V - 'U VI 'n N W y ~ R N T m VI i 9O M: L.~.~ Ca.N CC mUGMW G W LO O-Z , F a o o L v v 3 Q `0 m Q.^ o m o V u m N w • ~i o c m Z _a v - d w P4 a L N= M Y b M V N 0 G ` c L D m i c v m oy W o v o a L n rn o U ' ' ^ o w G m Il C 2w ON C Y Y U C v~ W C m G w b NO W WvmNVUG NUj O N ll 9 NT Z i # L N W w y N • F' L O U m ~ W m h 0 O W D E N 3 u .y I N f C T m w > N a + N R N N v (n m v v a y , o v yr ~ a A q V 2 L 1Y R v O_ L Il O W N m VI y w x mn 1- D_ O N Q O Y UUQ m 0.N . [[O Q !L 5 W is U CO n O ut W W h O qq K C O J v O U U 0 N P T •r_ M 0 z W z •a- O W U i v a N a O C 3 Ct w 3 w J w a M N U a i m O a 0 W 0 r Z 6 tt 3 3 O P N 0 v Lo ~ W P P m ~ o~ y a 3 O w v N W I- CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE 03/25/05 3:33 PM cdba Michael Castanten RECEIPT NO.CDA001332 AMOUNT FMGD ZONING APPLICATION F 200.00 ZONE PAYMENT RECEIVED AMOUNT CK 992 200.00 TOTAL 200.00