Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWA-09-05City of Wheatididge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building August 7, 2009 Catherine Snyder 2995 Webster St. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Dear Ms. Snyder: RE: Case No. WA-09-05 7500 W. 29`h Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 Please be advised that at its meeting of July 23, 2009, the Board of Adjustment APPROVED your request for a 5-foot rear yard setback variance from the 10-foot rear yard setback requirement resulting in a 5-foot rear yard setback on property zoned Residential One and located at 2995 Webster Street for the following reasons: 1. There is an existing six-foot privacy fence to the north and west on the property. 2. The house setback from the front of the lot is quite unique and sets it back further than required making placement of the shed impractical elsewhere. 3. Placement elsewhere would ruin the aesthetics of the property. 4. Five of seven criteria have been met with numbers 8 and 9 not applicable. 5. The shed location allowed by this rear yard variance directly abuts property zoned Planned Commercial Development with the subsequent required setback screening and landscaping of PCD along the long side of the shed. The Board of Adjustment also APPROVED your request for a 25-foot side yard setback variance from the 30-foot side yard setback requirement when adjacent to a public street resulting in a 5- foot side yard setback on property zoned Residential One and located at 2995 Webster Street for the following reasons: 1. It would not alter the essential character of the locality. 2. A substantial investment would be made in the property. 3. It would not be detrimental to public welfare or injurious to other properties or improvements. 4. Five of the seven criteria for the variance have been met. Criteria eight and nine are not applicable. 5. The location of the shed would be in the least conspicuous place on the property. 6. It would be adjacent to 38th Avenue which will be built to full width when that commercial property is developed. 7. The six-foot security fence minimizes effect on the adjacent neighborhood. w .ei.wheatridgexo.us Catherine Snyder Page 2 August 7, 2009 Enclosed is a copy of the Certificates of Resolution, as well as a draft copy of the minutes, stating the Board's decision which became effective the date of the meeting, July 23, 2009. This variance shall automatically expire within one hundred eighty (180) days of the date it was granted, January 19, 2010, unless a building permit has been obtained. Please feel free to contact me at (303) 235-2846 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Kathy Field Administrative Assistant Enclosures: Certificates of Resolution Draft of Minutes cc: WA-09-05 (case file) Building File WA0905.doc CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTION COPY I, Ann Lazzeri, Secretary to the City of Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment, do hereby certify that the following Resolution was duly adopted in the City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, on the 23rd day of July, 2009. CASE NO: WA-09-05 (A) APPLICANT'S NAME: Catherine A. Snyder LOCATION OF REQUEST: 2995 Webster Street WHEREAS, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and WHEREAS, Board of Adjustment application Case No. WA-09-05(A) is an appeal to the Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and WHEREAS, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law and in recognition that there were no protests registered against it; and WHEREAS, the relief applied for may be granted without detriment to the public welfare and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge. Now, therefore, be it resolved that Board of Adjustment application Case No. WA-09-05(A) be, and hereby is APPROVED. TYPE OF VARIANCE: A five foot rear setback variance to the ten foot required rear setback for property zoned Residential One. FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. There is an existing six-foot privacy fence to the north and west on the property. 2. The house setback from the front of the lot is quite unique and sets it back further than required making placement of the shed impractical elsewhere. 3. Placement elsewhere would ruin the aesthetics of the property. 4. Five of seven criteria have been met with numbers eight and nine not applicable. 5. The shed location allowed by this rear yard variance directly abuts property zoned Planned Commercial Development (PCD) with the subsequent required setback screening and landscaping of PCD along the long side of the shed. Board of Adjustment Resolution WA-09-05(A) Page two (2) VOTE: YES: ABBOTT, BELL, BLAIR, FISHER, HOVLAND, HOWARD, PAGE ABSENT: BUCKNAM and LINKER DISPOSITION: A five foot rear setback variance to the ten foot required rear setback for property zoned Residential One was APPROVED. ADOPTED and made effective this 23rd day of July, 2009. f4Pa,1ovland,-Vice Chair Ann Lazzeri, Secretary Board of Adjustment Board of Adjustment CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTION COPY I, Ann Lazzeri, Secretary to the City of Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment, do hereby certify that the following Resolution was duly adopted in the City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, on the 23rd day of July, 2009. CASE NO: WA-09-05 (B) APPLICANT'S NAME: Catherine A. Snyder LOCATION OF REQUEST: 2995 Webster Street WHEREAS, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and WHEREAS, Board of Adjustment application Case No. WA-09-05(B) is an appeal to the Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and WHEREAS, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law and in recognition that there were no protests registered against it; and WHEREAS, the relief applied for may be granted without detriment to the public welfare and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge. Now, therefore, be it resolved that Board of Adjustment application Case No. WA-09-05(B) be, and hereby is APPROVED. TYPE OF VARIANCE: A twenty-five foot side setback variance to the required thirty foot setback requirement on property zoned Residential One. FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: I. It would not alter the essential character of the locality. 2. A substantial investment would be made in the property. 3. It would not be detrimental to public welfare or injurious to other properties or improvements. 4. Five of the seven criteria for the variance have been met. Criteria eight and nine are not applicable. 5. The location of the shed would be in the least conspicuous place on the property. 6. It would be adjacent to 381h Avenue which will be built to full width when that commercial property is developed. 7. The six-foot security fence minimizes effect on the adjacent neighborhood. Board of Adjustment Resolution WA-09-05(B) Page two (2) VOTE: YES: ABBOTT, BELL, BLAIR, FISHER, HOVLAND, HOWARD, PAGE ABSENT: BUCKNAM and LINKER DISPOSITION: A twenty-five foot side setback variance to the required thirty foot setback requirement on property zoned Residential One was APPROVED. ADOPTED and made effective this 23rd day of July, 2009. LL P ul ovlan ice Chair Ann Lazzeri, Secretat Board of Adjustment Board of Adjustment 1. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. 2. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property that may not be possible without the variance. 3. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare and would not be injurious to neighboring properties or improvements. 4. The conditions necessitating the variance request are present in the neighborhood and are not unique to the subject property. 5. The addition is over fifty percent west of the mid-line of the existing structure. 6. A letter of approval has been submitted by-fife neighbor immediately to the south. l°= With the following conditions: 1. The addition must follow exisfrnkarchiteetural design and ;materials of the affected side of the existing house 2. Upright landscaping material or otIR,~pes of material shall be used to provide reasonable screening of this addition from the view of the street. 3. As the request is for upo fen fe the Board requests the applicant and staff to work on reducing ~hvaxince toless than ten feet. Board Member M&RD offerd a friendly~Mmendment to state that the addition cannot be buiv Ioser than feet from the lot line. The amendment was accept4~ BoardNembers ABBOTT and BELL. HOWARD voting no. Case No~T3 A-00 5 n application filed by Catherine Snyder for approval ol) a 5- or rear yard setback variance from the 10-foot rear yard setbacequirement resulting in a 5-foot rear yard setback; and (B) a 45. side~ard setback variance from the 30-foot side yard setback re jn emenf. hen adjacent to a public street resulting in a 5-foot side yard setbackson property zoned Residential One and located at 2995 Webster The case was presented by Meredith Reckert. She entered all pertinent documents into the record and advised the Board there was jurisdiction to hear the case. She reviewed the staff report and digital presentation. Staff recommended approval for reasons outlined in the staff report. Board Member BLAIR asked if there had been any response from the neighbors. Ms. Reckert stated that one phone call was received from an adjacent neighbor who, upon explanation of the variance request, indicated support of the application. Board of Adjustment Minutes -3- July 23, 2009 Catherine Snyder, the applicant, was sworn in by Vice Chair HOVLAND. She stated that she worked very hard to find a location for the shed that would be within the city guidelines, but came to the conclusion it could not be done without a variance. Her property is secluded with a six-foot fence. The proposed placement of the shed would be in the most inconspicuous portion of her property. Adjacent property to the west is not residential. She stated that many of her neighbors have sheds placed on the property line. Ms. Reckert agreed that many of the neighbors do property line. At the request of Board Member HOW shed she plans to have erected in her yE There were no members of the public HOVLAND closed the public hearing Upon a motion by Board FISHER, the following r, Whereas, the applicant was and Whereas,`Bo appeal to the and placed on the a photo of the this matter. -Vice Chair by Board Member administrative officer; on Case No. WA-09-05(A) is an an administrative officer; and been posted the fifteen days required by law and 4 o protests registered against it; and Wliereas, the reliefxApplied for may be granted without detriment to the pubhc fare amt ithout substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regu ft ns goAerning the City of Wheat Ridge. Now, theref6 e, be it resolved that Board of Adjustment application Case No. WA-09-05(A) be, and hereby is APPROVED. For the following reasons: 1. There is an existing six-foot privacy fence to the north and west on the property. 2. The house setback from the front of the lot is quite unique and sets it back further than required making placement of the shed impractical elsewhere. 3. Placement elsewhere would ruin the aesthetics of the property. Board of Adjustment Minutes -4- July 23, 2009 Board Member ABBOTT offered a friendly amendment: Five of seven criteria have been met with numbers 8 and 9 not applicable. The amendment was accepted by Board Members PAGE and FISHER Board Member ABBOTT offered a second friendly amendment: The shed location allowed by this rear yard variance directly abuts property zoned Planned Commercial Development with the subsequent required setback screening and landscaping of PCD along the long side q,~tJze shed. The amendment was accepted by Commissioners PAGE and RYAN. The amended motion carried 7-0. Upon a motion by Board Member BELL-and-second by Board Member FISHER, the following resolution was stated: Whereas, the applicant was denied pernPi9sion by°an administra ve officer; and Whereas, Board of Adlustmd"pplication Cas_ , o WA-09-05(B) is an appeal to the Board from the deci~i6if of an administrative officer; and Whereas, the property has been postedthe fifteen days required by law and in recognition thMUre were no p o`tests regi" red against it; and E WENS, Whereas, IhMtief apWied for may bre-g d without detriment to the public welfare and w►tRonUsu~ antiplly impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations govern ng the- N of Wheat Ridge. 'der ow, thereforebXit restved"that Board of Adjustment application Case No. S- }1-09-05(B) be, and hereJy is APPROVED. s. For M ollowing asons: 1. It tvauld hot alter the essential character of the locality. 2. A subantial investment would be made in the property. 3. It would not be detrimental to public welfare or injurious to other properties or improvements. 4. Five of the seven criteria for the variance have been met. Criteria eight and nine are not applicable. 5. The location of the shed would be in the least conspicuous place on the property. 6. It would be adjacent to 38`h Avenue which will be built to full width when that commercial property is developed. 7. The six-foot security fence minimizes effect on the adjacent neighborhood. Board of Adjustment Minutes -5- July 23, 2009 t- The motion carried 7-0. 5. 6. 7 8. CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING Vice Chair HOVLAND closed the public hearing. OLD BUSINESS Ms. Reckert advised the Board that more information seating alternates will be available at a later meeting.- Board Member PAGE reported that she submrttednc Adjustment banner at Carnation Festival. NEW BUSINESS A. Approval of minutes - June 25, It was moved by Board PAGE to approve the n carried unanimously. The at 8:40 and se- .2009 as a policy for Board of Board Member A. The motion Ann Lazzeri, Secretary Board of Adjustment Minutes -6- July 23, 2009 > - Ci~p S 5.PA 7 z i C- L7 1 ww 3~ 1 a . pre, r l l S ? unc ance l \ V 5~ HOME SERVICE . ~ s r n .a . _ , b _ A .'f Wx` BASE f IN/ PAINT S: 399 l Sl jl a~cav x~psa 53 Z'9 X24 52,499 a S9 53,079 1 $3439 a V W, L-.: I b4SE I W1 PAW 8'xi 2'x10'5" 8"16,106, 0,10x116 Jx12 11'6 x16 d 16 ' 9x20,11'6 i2'x12'x12'6' 12'x16'xl 2'6' :2'x20'u12'6' ~ 8<0,810 899 x2,34 8x.2x8'ICY[ 52 1-19 S2,382, d x2369 52,04 _ 8 :6'x8'11 S2Ifl9 _ 52,324 I !3x10x92' 5 2,199~ 52529 ~ 110'x17,952,469 1.52799 _ 10'x 16'x'92', 52.9°9 S33;9 I l0'x20'x9'` S3,3'9 53,849 12,12`,6' 52879 3309 1T-d6'x9'o~S3 V9 E 1 _ -909 112x20x95 15-,C89 { 54,519 16 6 :9., x4699 1 S5_29 ~ ~ 10 2 S, 399 2 0 S~ 979 1<x1 C21 56199 56779 W: L,H 1 BASE W/PAl^I( 0 .2'x12 o S1,999 11 S3,334 U, 165, 19'6"[ S,A6 q 53974 !9,20'x126 230 S4,59~1 0 12x1353889 54,339 16'x13 '1 S4199 54.649 2',20'x136"[ 54899 55389 1 112 'x94 x13 6 65,5]9 So 029 20'x158 75 9 58,.59 6,24x15 x8669 _ 59,309 $5,119 I 55,569 t t,: 9 A e irn ..,,D.,.N r. o C aa`=1 a 4i x An S_7.6 S ✓59 B~SE VA, c. s„,,. 'r._+,,. Home m _ ~nws ..a rd, ~ w.. , 9:- x~ 19, 169 36,7 9 I 57,299 !J =x H~l A5~ WlPANl 12'x 6'x9'6' 199 19'_ Y2" 55,829 56,469 )'2" 56,759 57,339 08t TUFF SHED- The Sundance ,series' W x i BASE W RAiw 6'x!D,6 S1,369 SI5 4 S, 0 399 8-3,6 S ~ 9 9 E4-< e 2/1/08 TSHD PB SS 0 rl, N` -P r~ MPOR'TANT2 Colors shown on this brochure are approximations For closer color matches, consul actual color swatches inside The Home Depot' pain) deparrlment. Key Ghrdar papa Aar ~ Bohr , _ Custom colors are available by customer request, and may require an additional fee. ro 11, or eef or 2a' Deep Shelving ire eel of Pegboard De Packs of Assorted )Sty Pegboa d nooks 3 .w s's rye I V2nI5 or roe of Ridge Vent idiom, Berner Rooi Decking 3 k l 24" Deep Workbencn h , e /,:x141 es car wdro neidn,f s Pegboard 48n g,r b, mldth o /dl e6dJdln One Large Pock art Heow Dory Pegboard Hooks One 2x2 Window One Raw of Ramos Weno,mA Whire RAlej fea,6er, Arrque Sterling Pebble Deft Grestor aelae Flaxen White B ck Road Khaki Green Evening Shadow Swiss Coifed o M INNOW op" _G 17n1a15K n Tat De/c..r./OGti AnOon grown L } A it icri I nar,r o le sor) a om! 00 1'1n[liJS of "'in 'aria r, / I)r h ] oris Va -/ed c rl cca, o ag /n) nres_ Add r _ s je'o~ n£ s, n s pro, , rdararat op or c:rel Spring Magnolia Sweef Sandy Sonora dorgus elC/ oo/I, elan Seb to (/..le. man ria a hour n➢fti ' lar:sa osk"seE rcirlr,,r.in ai _ he:i;>rre ]d „r,p.(ra S. s in d6s4 P (asa, Pce Home re' o mirrun. Syrian; lope "wer nawee Girl, oaPdatze o aura .aaket pries Inc Dort rstn'rna s To} apply. Hello, l am ~ ttt Classic liberty Red Burmese Beige Meadowlark - A4 AZ) ARIL CAI FU i. ID)'' . 14 IAI , Ur nr MN) 851 !n ML) Nq ' N, NV ^ Or o NMI ',2 )10 S NO)~k`.C DR) Sq. Tal- ci i 4) 01 VA - - " WA) - A M) r )I W) 91 o ? ~ HOME VCa fUST(eP E YP English Pinewood Green rf gm+ Z k SERVICES ° _ Effective 2/1/08 TSHD Pe 55 T2JUh J2008ID Sic, 11, ~ w ighl iv .r,. J /'IG'nnJ 1 set ra>rroe cis i._ u,.DDm h,t S1f7, Inc U~v 011 'HOME SERVICES w~ NP'....,.. v r \ ~ f i 'l4 1 N ' C \lt a , u nC.k~P."a 'i.x g b'~sv. -1 a 11 two } ffio TUFF SHED' The Sundance Series' SmartSide. 9 v M a 0 a ~ Q N 1 tf a N F f w- re ri p s ~ a 9 v_ o{ 0 d ?fii W1 L l=;£ ,ol ; N I ik sq IE3R Ea -0i 7a~ 7a; a i i Lpi, L aL (D n rt rt O I~j d Q D CD a) 1.0 110 W y c CD (D 6 -n rt te fll O C n a r N (D 1 o T rt N 77 O -0 6 O N > a) CD o- fl. w 0 In n O (D -c \L N fD ~ V1 N v O o C Ul Q r-F rt CD O (D (D , ^ V = O O v rh N 3 0 77 N O rt W< O N rt C Q CD N o~i' T O O O ~O Z 0 s y m 0 a ao m T a M O T O 0 0 a 0 °m 12 a 0 a a 0 a a a s 0 3 X = m x ~ P T a ✓n- 0 'dl"Vl 01 (A" o ne" m U1 D- ~ o s T M a U2 w - w = ui o C 0 o p c N w w 0 0 0 o s a 0 ca 3 S (D S A i N a v m O L 3 m 3 rf h rf d 3 CL d C N ez 3$ o ; ~ ~ a s g a✓ L J z 0 n 0 0 a 0 a m Q) a oL~ fD IC r+ f1 rT Di Vl N H 0 Q'O-h m w -h 2) c ty 'n rt ~ xC7 CL N m (A [7 W to CD 2) fD 70 (D rt z fu y (D A E pr (D cr rOf r+ tD fA (D n m CL fn m fn a, G D M a i (A rr y a M rt DJ 2) cr y 7C n fD 7 O G 7C M Ol C m p (r n fu _ O n rt 0 O S fD O 3 W n d 7 (D 00 c Q O 0 0- 0 0- (D O 7 v O C 6 C-) v m rt n 0 c n (D (D O (D O. O O - rt rrtr O 3 O N prt (D n O (D N n O n (D C C (D D Q 7 O n Z~ 77 O 3 < = n (D n 00 n Q Ln C (D a Q Lr) 0 N O 0 0 n O O O Q 3 LA O ~ d ~ C O (D (D cn O 6 C O 3 ((DD O_ O (D O O < C (D 6 (D O rt O O 7 N LO n O D 0 O CD 7 7 Cl N D v v O D r 0 rt (D (D (D mo C (D U) O (D CD iv W r O W 33 - Lo (D 3 7 C 3 O -rt-n :~E TD,, CD (D .fl! (D.,, (D d O O (D . , -0 CT (D rt aj 0 (D v d v N ❑ 3 O to Oi n (D `G CD ~O d C O (D O Q rt 0 CD p rt ?9 L cn =T m L rt n (D (D D n n 3 ( D s (D 3ry -0 CD (D (D n Co. L IL rt n Ln 0) U c (D O 07 :3 O' n Qj Cl ~ D O l0 (D O (D r ~W O O Q O Q O LO O Q 3 _S C 7 (p In rt =T (D Ln Q O rt O l f11 LL 07 N (n rt C 00 n (D C O (D O O CD OJ rt rt m (D -0 d ((DD Q (D p C o- (D Q Q 50 (D n 0 rt < C O O' (D C \ (D Lo 0 (D cn (D v Q ((DD rt (D v L n D 77 LL fll 7 u N U1 CD- (D 70 Q CD C 6 (n rt nT v~ G D N u ®®A41 ® City of Wh6atPud ge CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO: CASE MANAGER: Board of Adjustment DATE: July 23, 2009 CASE NO. & NAME: Meredith Reckert WA-09-05/Snyder ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a five (5') foot rear setback variance to the ten (10') foot required rear setback AND a twenty-five (25') foot side setback variance to the required thirty (30') foot setback requirement on property zoned Residential-One A (R- lA) located at 2995 Webster Street. LOCATION OF REQUEST: 2995 Webster Street APPLICANT /OWNER: Catherine A. Snyder APPROXIMATE AREA: 11,338 square feet PRESENT ZONING: Residential-One A (R-IA) PRESENT LAND USE: Single Family Residence ENTER INTO RECORD: (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) DIGITAL PRESENTATION (X) ZONING ORDINANCE Case No. WA-09-05/Snyder JURISDICTION: All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. L REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a five (5') rear foot setback variance to the ten (10') foot required rear setback AND a twenty-five (25') foot side setback variance to the required thirty (30') foot setback requirement adjacent to a public street on property zoned Residential- One A (R-lA) located at 2995 Webster Street. The purpose of the variances is to allow construction of a 192 square foot wooden shed over 8' in height. (Exhibit 1, applicant drawing) Section 26-115.C (Variances and Waivers) of the Wheat Ridge City Code empowers the Board of Adjustment to hear and decide on variances from the strict application of the zoning district development standards. Variance requests of over 50% from the development standards are required to be heard at a public hearing, before the Board of Adjustment. Because this is a two-part request with the larger request requiring a public hearing, both portions will be heard by the Board. II. CASE ANALYSIS Catherine Snyder is requesting this variance as the property owner. The subject property is 115.25 feet wide by 98.35 feet deep and 11,335 square feet in total area. (Exhibit 2 improvement t, 7 location certificate); There is an existing single family residence on the property approximately 1,952 square feet in size. (Exhibit 3,-Site Photos). The property is zoned Residential One A (R-1 A), which carries with it a set of development standards that include the following for main structures and accessory structures, including the proposed shed which will be over 8' in height: House Shed over 8'in height Front setback 30' 30' Interior side setback (south) 10' 10' Side setback adjacent to street 30' 30' Rear setback 15' 10' The property is a corner lot with Webster running along the eastern frontage and W. 30`h Avenue running along the northern property line. Case No. WA-09-05/Snyder The existing house with attached two car garage, which was built in 1954, meets the minimum 30' setback from Webster at the southeast corner of the property. The rest of the existing front wall of the house staggers back whereby the setback from Webster at the northeast corner is 45'. The northern setback for the house from W. 30a' Avenue is 29'. The setback from the south property line is 16' and the rear house setback is 25'. There are two covered patios on the western side of the structure which comprise the outdoor living space for the residence. One of the covered patios extends into the rear yard resulting in an 18' rear setback for this portion of the house. A 6' high solid fence totally encloses the side and rear yards of the property. Surrounding properties to the east, south and north are single family residential and are zoned Residential One A (R-lA). The Wadsworth Exchange Planned Commercial Development abuts the property to the west. The PCD has been approved for up to 93,000 square feet of commercial development. (Exhibit 4 ,adsworth Exchange ODP) , 30"' Avenue running along the north property line is constructed to a full width status except for the western 11' where it narrows down to a half-width. Upon development of the commercial property to the rear, Webster Street will be fully built out. Staff did not find any evidence of setback variances granted in the immediate vicinity. Although from the aerial photo, it is evident that there are many setback encroachments by what appear to be existing sheds. Attached is a drawing illustrating where a shed meeting required setbacks could be built without variances. (Exlubrt 5!F, allowable shed locationsj° III. VARIANCE CRITERIA Staff has the following criteria to evaluate variance requests and shall determine that the majority of the "criteria for review" listed in Section 26-115.C.4 of the City Code have been met. The applicant has provided their analysis of the applications compliance with the variance criteria (E apphcapt responses. Staff provides the following review and analysis of the variance criteria. Request A: A five rear foot setback variance to the ten foot required rear setback resulting in a 5' rear setback. 1. The property in question would not yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located. Case No. WA-09-05/Snyder If the request were denied, the property would continue to yield a reasonable return. The property currently has a single family home on it and it may remain in this manner regardless of outcome of the variance request. If denied, the applicants would still be able to construct a shed but it would be required to meet the setbacks for the R-lA zone district. Staff finds this criterion has not been met. 2. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. If the request were granted, the character of the locality would not be altered. While no other shed setback variances are reflected in the city's case log in the immediate vicinity, it is apparent that there are numerous violations by sheds erected without permits violating the required setbacks. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 3. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property with this application, which would not be possible without the variance. The applicant is proposing an investment in the property that could improve the existing conditions on the parcel. This investment would still be possible without the variance but would encroach into the existing small back yard which is 18'- 25' in depth. The front yard is nicely landscaped and maintained and erection of a shed in this area would negatively impact the aesthetics of the street view of the property. As both of the rear patios are covered, a shed in these areas would have to have a 3' separation from the edge of the patio roofs. Other options for shed placement are impractical. Staff finds this criterion has been met 4. The particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved results in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out. The surrounding physical conditions have resulted in the request for the shed to be built at the proposed location. The property is a corner lot which requires 30' setbacks from both the east and north. In addition, the structure design "staggering" the building back to the west has further constrained available room in the back yard. Other options for shed placement such as in the front yard are impractical and would negatively impact the neighborhood. Staff finds this criterion has been met. Case No. WA-09-05/Snyder 4 5. The alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. A person who has interest in the property has created the hardship. The request relates to the location of the proposed shed that does not meet current development standards. It is possible to relocate the proposed shed in a location on the property where setbacks can be met; however, this may prove to be inconvenient for the owner and may impact the aesthetics of the property. Staff finds this criterion has not been met. 6. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located, by, among other things, substantially or permanently impairing the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or substantially diminishing or impairing property values within the neighborhood. Staff concludes that the request would not be detrimental to public welfare and would not be injurious to neighboring property or improvements. It would not hinder or impair the development of the adjacent property. The adequate supply of air and light would not be compromised as a result of this request. The request would not increase the congestion in the streets, nor would it increase the danger of fire. The request will most likely not have an effect on property values in the neighborhood. The shed would not cause an obstruction to motorists on the adjacent streets and would not impede the sight distance triangle. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 7. The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are present in the neighborhood and are not unique to the property. There are numerous corner lots within the City that have the same development constraints with required 30' setbacks from both street frontages. The home design has further limited options for placement of the shed. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 8. Granting of the variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities. Single family homes and their accessory structures are not required to meet building codes pertaining to the accommodation of persons with disabilities. Case No. WA-09-05/Snyder 5 Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. 9. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual. The Architectural and Site Design Manual does not apply to single and two family dwellings. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. Request B: A twenty-five foot side setback variance to the required thirty (30) foot setback requirement adjacent to a public street. 1. The property in question would not yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located. If the request were denied, the property would continue to yield a reasonable return. The property currently has a single family home on it and it may remain in this manner regardless of outcome of the variance request. If denied, the applicants would still be able to construct a shed but it would be required to meet the setbacks for the R-IA zone district. Staff finds this criterion has not been met. 2. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. If the request were granted, the character of the locality would not be altered. While no other shed setback variances are reflected in the city's case log in the immediate vicinity, it is apparent that there are numerous violations by sheds erected without permits violating the required setbacks. The northern side yard is surrounded by a 6' high solid wooden fence which would provide additional screening from W. 30th Avenue. The proposed shed would be tucked into the northwestern corner of the property adjacent to a utility pole. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 3. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property with this application, which would not be possible without the variance. The applicant is proposing an investment in the property that could improve the existing conditions on the parcel. This investment would still be possible without the variance but would encroach into the existing small back yard which is 18'- 25' in depth. The front yard is nicely landscaped and maintained and erection of a shed would negatively impact the aesthetics of the street view of the property. As both of the rear patios are covered, a shed in these areas would have to have a 3' Case No. WA-09-05/Snyder separation from the edge of the patio roofs. Other options for shed placement are impractical. While there is more room to work with on the north side as there is 29' from the fence to the north wall of the house, it is the only large expanse of turf within the rear and side yards. Staff finds this criterion has been met 4. The particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved results in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out. The surrounding physical conditions have resulted in the request for the shed to be built at the proposed location. The property is a corner lot which requires 30' setbacks from both the east and north. In addition, the structure design "staggering" the building back to the west has further constrained available room in the back yard. Other options for shed placement such as in the front yard are impractical and would negatively impact the neighborhood. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 5. The alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. A person who has interest in the property has created the hardship. The request relates to the location of the proposed shed that does not meet current development standards. It is possible to relocate the proposed shed in a location on the property where setbacks can be met; however, this may prove to be inconvenient for the owner and may impact the aesthetics of the property. Staff finds this criterion has not been met 6. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located, by, among other things, substantially or permanently impairing the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or substantially diminishing or impairing property values within the neighborhood. Staff concludes the request would not be detrimental to public welfare and would not be injurious to neighboring property or improvements. It would not hinder or Case No. WA-09-05/Snyder impair the development of the adjacent property. The adequate supply of air and light would not be compromised as a result of this request. The request would not increase the congestion in the streets, nor would it increase the danger of fire. The request will most likely not have an effect on property values in the neighborhood. The shed would not cause an obstruction to motorists on the adjacent streets and would not impede the sight distance triangle. Staff finds this criterion has been met. The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are present in the neighborhood and are not unique to the property. There are numerous comer lots within the City that have the same development constraints with required 30' setbacks from both street frontages. The home design has further limited options for placement of the shed. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 8. Granting of the variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities. Single family homes and their accessory structures are not required to meet building codes pertaining to the accommodation of persons with disabilities. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. 9. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual. The Architectural and Site Design Manual does not apply to single and two family dwellings. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. IV. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Request A Having found the application in compliance with the majority of the applicable review criteria, staff recommends approval of the five foot rear setback variance to the ten foot required rear setback resulting in a five foot rear setback. Staff has found that there are unique circumstances attributed to this request that would warrant approval of a variance. While there are alternatives for placement, they are impractical and may negatively impact the aesthetics of the property. Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL for the following reasons: Case No. WA-09-05/Snyder 1. There are unique circumstances as the property is a corner lot and there is very little usable back yard, resulting in minimal viable options for shed placement. 2. The variance will not alter the character of the neighborhood. 3. The aesthetics of the property could be impacted if the variance is not granted. 4. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare. Request B Having found the application in compliance with the majority of the applicable review criteria, staff recommends approval of the twenty five foot side setback variance to the thirty foot required setback adjacent to a street resulting in a five foot side setback. Staff has found that there are unique circumstances attributed to this request that would warrant approval of a variance. Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL for the following reasons: 1. There are unique circumstances as the property is a corner lot and there is very little usable back yard, resulting in minimal viable options for shed placement. 2. The variance will not alter the character of the neighborhood. 3. The aesthetics of the property could be impacted if the variance is not granted. 4. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare. 5. The existing 6' fence along W. 30th Avenue will provide screening of the shed from the surrounding neighborhood. Case No. WA-09-05/Snyder 9 Sh,d- ~~aeemevit on p(o~" .r \ - ~ Tom.- _ _ ~l~~tvEYxlEhll 11-4 lj~, TerrAN na ate: 5 u 8 70 ' - Z-e9c - = 20' n EXHIBIT 1 0 O w LL w 0 z w J U F H z O 0 a U C€ N] O U g O N O 0 m a w E z m o m a 99 w w o p .4 z ov a Z LO, w 0 O Q w a U_ Z O w ~ N F- } w Do w 41 NOmm ZU O ' O a <.6 a 09gN U U) rc -0 O a <m ~ ¢v Z O O w a w Zto > O Q a J ~ H a N b N N Q C N a 0 d W ~i G G ~ ~ Pr . P. m O CO) o O R a° O ,m Z U d w d d M 00 M D\ N N 0 N y 'A1'O'W,041aaRS JQISgD& 966Z SZ'SII SZ'SII h a O tl m T N -0 vas~` m T~ C o0 c0 a N ~.c N > C. N N N 3w° p EC 0 a'0 1o ~o'ammo°m N C C 'NFO « NC N N U."'111 m'Cn_. aEa mot oa FE - 9O«O1 mca.. N O E 0 E p a r c L'c N v.EaE A N c Lg` m C o , t6 C fa 0 p > c o m n 'row c0~ a w E E :6w o„a5 O u E co 'O m-`o « C N V c N p v. rN El t6 O N _'o ~aii~3a2 =om pI TmTEO d~ o q y N T Y co o ui g Y N J N C N N -O c° U T (n N N N E an d E ~~"mEom`g O N N N N 'o Emc C N a-cc N 0 N E O v C E' E o a a d a>00M 0 a) .t.. E C V p (wJ N c m E C N C F o m c E 00 O o._oaNZmm% ~ o o~ W° Nza _aN ~WZ :bdm OR rs?. LOOKING EAST EXHIBIT 3 T SIDE 0-0-KING earRr s E S°s kv--%p-ru q L, Ol 0 K IN G~ I.AlE ST C YARD, 'nr T SIDE, LOOKING SOOT AC- ' CJ, WEST SIDS LOOKING NORTH Wadsworth Exchange Planned Commercial Development, Amendment No. I Outline Development Plan: An OfMal Development Plan in the City of Wheat Ridge A Parcel of Land Located in the SE 1 of Section 26, Township 3 South, Rgnp 69 West of the 6th City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado site Plan L 1/ - Sheet 2 of s ✓ ~ i(2_ 1 - I ~ ~ ERM49 f4WstY lYu R.OX Dedication RaRh4$i1 RF m x Access Ex1S[ Ceknel~e y (.letTeo) 3;Ffiy` RJ.6 D A• C \ J t Z I~51ASGCIItiA I , ` ll! III I ~ l F I6~~ 17 i I l l I . (1,(y'$~]~.~ gyry ~A j, .V. 33Z YJEL T{'S , i~ S. MV I i!h RA A Ij ) ~ r P P' DIP I 'e I ~ I ~ WEBSTER ST. 6 Foov So1[dPgnc¢q with Ovaratory Plantinge R96tdV'a t A alts design shown for epee Io vas as of the data of ties ODP R-2 Mtw Oav Access Site Plan SCAIE: 1=1~ I SC,ll.B IN FEET o loo BBO NoIeTN ExletMg-29' pabNC right of uwu~iiy~-.nv monn4cti t of veFUCUlar.8mG6ee io thle wrtofelt; wideigrmund utllillsa 131 ba~aeceaaad 29 foGt eras of 1aa6r1et1on I fmr Rt:acgtRartfai by ,Vi CKy. A uNtlud For Wedarth 61vd. axpwulon, / I@ 10 fo ¢eapw pgvalopm-M and fmp! araiF+uay. RM) FJadfaatbn to City Lay fVUYO plat cbcaaerA Solid FtaseNSy Trash Encbewe with Laad g Neightiohnmd Pedeatriam Cmrneatlan I 196 Td At- PARKING SPACES P -Ject 5k "4$ Typ. - Right-InRigiR-out Immeactldrl /1@HJL a «°eim WADSWORTH BMLEVARD 6 Aunt S lIa F.*;Iq elth OvwetcN Mi rlt"v r 1 I I II esr~ I lip Traffic Lana par Grnarte FlraSit Edq yc WeN 79th As to ktn tadrXhM' tra64a Aaan~a»CTat{nxa, rt didbaCida Man Ir nt ~a~i aoaenwu Fyli Moyweeat Harare-Ctw to Alb" with Pf". Place city of Ilkeat Ridge ASGdee FOlht fboJaot 54y g., Typ. I FI A, Rabll B, end B9d[eaa a tpt;, 3k daw opeelne are deter. 5tap etgnaga, Typ. Traffic Analyaie Glteria ` 20 Foot REfa1 Dadlcati. far Bladeworfh BouMvxd by Ntva plat document 511E :DATA TABLE Alicmabi- CoJar ge Mticlpatad Gmvdr$ge F'ei ZoMnd Albwanme F'er PrallmNaru 51ta'SlaafaTn EMnlc9noa ~0~00 6F. fl6s J _ _ Roads/Perkirig 53410 &F (45%) Cpengmace MhM 20%1'12940 5F (39%) I.. _TOtele Not I. Grdaa Ict eras la 4A01 as -700,401 5F. Ndt bt area, mMaie IX15 SF Iar Eaet 30tH AvehuefWebater Street daF.lba I. and 13'16 SF.. For Wadsworth Bmulevard dedlratlon, ie 4319 aurae - 15A,410 5F. 2. Data provided for th brM1lclpatad aov-rega par pretwkmru sit- V R far refarars- pwpoeea mnly and 4 Wu 4,,dt to dtange. f=01di 1. miff ba provided MW the Pinal otw4lapment Man. Tice _ sllawaLale :overage per zgnfM albwance" le valid per Nip outline Dellei©pmnt Plan. 3. I]$';tmtal parking apace: requlradt 190 parking Ip. provided 4. To the extort any Nwre governmental action to acquire ali or part of the 29-Foot reear Mtion area wwa to take the elte out -of compllanco with Clty requlrenont For mW. ink N property, the property Mall be conaldared laga lly pt ormke M regmds to those requlri wlta, pro,wi of that 3a; went of parkng reduction dodo not exceed 2s par¢ of t mMpratm - parkng requirement .1,,6 a greater reduction Ise bean ravt*Md and appro by tl community Devaicpn t Directu. SchaMPAX no SC.LLB &PFBI B B 90 tm aiL114e Cue fttstory WZ4W* WZ@H9i. tfetnn MM'. ho*, a,IM Bia kw,ow, bbMY 91, 20ia EXHIBIT 4 N Scale: 1 "=20' LO LEGAL DESCRIPTION (P-C-." 6, WEBSTER GROVE , COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO I~ West 30th Avenue v e v yo t VLA 98.35 S bG a d 0CA s ~~t t b ~k 10 61pl- CC) re SQ e d V-~ 6 eG LOT 6 1 f~ ~a.U y nc. rn N I ' 4.0 / One Story 0. Brick & Frame a 19.5 S / 11.0 21 CDIIe. d N vi ° 23.5 L Easement (Plat) 5' 98.35 LOT5 Patio v Conc. Drive . , =L-30.0- 1 ri N 7 J 0 d O v b m m h d rn N EXHIBIT 5 APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE ON 2995 WEBSTER STREE, WHEAT RIDGE, CO I am applying for a variance to decrease the setbacks on the north and west sides of my property, for the placement of a shed, which is 12'W X 16` L, height of 8.6 with your method of measurement. This shed has a loft, which increases the storage space from 182 sq. ft. to 302 sq. ft. On the west, I am requesting a 5' setback instead of 10' setback, and on the north 5' setback instead of 30' set back. The northwest corner of my property is the only space I can place this shed, based on the variance being approved. a. The property in question would not yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located. This property in question is not used for service or income. This is a private residence and the addition of a storage shed on the property, should make it more desirable for resale. To maintain property, there is a substantial amount of equipment involved. Having adequate storage space to keep all of this equipment, out of sight, in an attractive structure, creates a more desirable environment. b. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. No. It will enhance the character of the locality by providing a place for things that should be out of sight for normal daily living activities, such as tools, seasonal items, equipment, and building supplies. With a storage shed these things will be in their proper place, allowing me to put my car back in the garage, and have a place to do repairs, which will enhance the appearance of the property, EXHIBIT 6 APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE ON 2995 WEBSTER STREE, WHEAT RIDGE, CO c. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property with this application, which would not be possible without the variance. Yes. The shed I am interested in placing on my property is well built, with an attractive appearance, while providing a large area of storage space. This shed has a loft, which adds substantial area for storage. Having this shed will definitely get things out of sight, and improve the appearance of the property. It is not possible to place this shed on my property, without the variance. d. The particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved results in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out. Yes. All regulations were met with the placement of the house on this property, leaving no space to place a shed, without a variance of the regulations. On the east and on the north side of the house, the setback required is 30'. The house sets according to these regulations, therefore, no place for the shed. On the south side there is a requirement of a 5' setback for the shed, the house is 16' from the fence, which again leaves no room for the shed. To the west there is a 10' requirement as a setback if the shed is over 8' high. The southwest portion, of the property has a large covered patio, which is a nice entertainment area, as it extends out beyond the house an additional T with concrete, on to the yard area. To the north of the patio there is an roofed area, that extends out into the yard 7`, which leaves 18' so with the APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE ON 2995 WEBSTER STREE, WHEAT RIDGE, CO 10' setback there is no room to place the shed. The back northwest portion of the property is the only area large enough to place the shed, however, the set back restrictions, do not allow it to be placed, in this area, without a variance. The northwest area, sets on a dead end street, to the north, where there would never be another house built, and to the west is commercial property, which most likely would use the area adjacent to my property, on the north as their service area, so this shed would not be a detriment for the commercial property. This is the most reasonable area, for placement, all things considered and required. e. The alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. No, not in any way. f. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located, by, among other things, substantially or permanently impairing the appropriate use of development of adjacent property, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or substantially diminishing or impairing property values within the neighborhood. No, it would not. g. The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance requested are present in the neighborhood and are not unique to this property. APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE ON 2995 WEBSTER STREE, WHEAT RIDGE, CO Yes. I believe so, under the same conditions they would be, unless the city changed some of the regulations. All corner lots would face this same dilemma. h. Granting the variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with a disability. Not applicable. The shed will be accessible to a person with disabilities. i. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable slanders set forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual. POSTING CERTIFICATION CASENO. Yv A "U9- D,5 PLANNING CONMSSION / CITY COUNCIL / BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (Circle One) HEARING DATE: I, -20v residing at lu ~5 M DS (address) as the applicant for Case No WA --OR _Q 5 hereby certify that I have posted the Notice of Public Hearing at (locatio aq w on this day of 20 0 and do hereby certify that said sign has been posted and remained in place for fifteen (15) days prior to and including the scheduled day of public hearing of this case. The sign was posted in the position shown on the map below. r Signature: NOTE: This form must be submitted at the public hearing on this case and will be placed in the applicant's case file at the Department of Planning and Development. w w V Z 3 0 U e: R N R-2 a m ~ W 3MAVE A W.29TH AVE. u14-10 9- os/ Snya/er LEMESSURIER JAMES T LEMESSURIER KAYLA 2910 WEBSTER ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 7008 3230 0003 5514 8076 BELL EST R H 2935 VA WHE CO 80 33 7008 3230 0003 5514 8106 MUCILLI PASQUALE E MUCILLI ANGELA J 2940 WEBSTER ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 7008 3230 0003 5514 130+-7 C/C as?'~' WILSON DONALD L NZEN PHILIP R WIL SON SUSANNA M NZEN CAROL L 2915 WEBSTER ST WEBSTER ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 8003AT RIDGE CO 80033 7008 3230 0003 5514 8083 7008 3230 0003 5514 8090 EDELEN DONALD W WHITNEY DAVID J EDELEN JANET M WHITNEY SHARI L 2935 WEBSTER ST 2940 VANCE ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 7008 3230 0003 5514 Al,pn 7008 3230 UUU3 5514 blIJ BELL ESTHER H MCPHEE ROSE 2955 VANCE ST WHITE CHRISTOPHER A WHEAT RIDGE CO 80215 2955 WEBSTER ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 8137 7008 3230 0003 5514 8144 7008 3230 0003 5514 GREEN KEVIN F SCHARDEIN YNN S TOWELL CHRISTINE HUDSON 2960 WEBSTER ST 2975 VANC 2975 WEBSTER ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 WHE CO 80033 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 7008 3230 0003 5514 81687008 3230 0003 5514 8175 7008 3230 0003 5514 8182 FULTON NEAL 2980 WEBSTER ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 7008 3230 0003 5514 8199 DRIVER LAURA A 2995 VANCE ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 PURSELL GLEN D PURSELL THERESA M 2980 VANCE ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 8151 FORD JOYCE L 2990 VANCE ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 7008 3230 0003 5514 8212 7008 3230 0003 5514 8205 CATHERINE A NYDER TRUST BATTAGLIA DOROTHY J 2995 WEBSTER ST 3000 VANCE ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 7008 3230 0003 5514 8229 7008 3230 0003 5514 8236 7008 3230 0003 5514 8243 BAUMANN MARGARET M 3005 VANCE ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 7008 3230 0003 5514 8250 YOUNG CARLA J 3010 WEBSTER ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 7008 3230 0003 5514 8281 MORKRE LAURENCE M MORKRE LAURIE S 3020 VANCE ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 7008 3230 0003 5514 LOTZ LEAH N 3035 WEBSTER ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 7008 3230 0003 5514 8311 -7008 3230 UUUJ bbl4 n~U4 SEBERG VIR IA L 3030 WEBST T WHE _ 003 i 7008 3230 0003 5514 8335 7008 3230 0003 5514 8328 HARROLD JOSEPH P BLASCO JILL L HARROLD TIFFANY M 3045 VANCE ST 3040 VANCE ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 8342 7008 3230 0003 5514 YERBY ROY A LAW DAVID W KAISER KRISTYNE K LAW CATHY J 3005 UPHAM CT 1045 CODY ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 LAKEWOOD CO 80215 7008 3230 0003 5514 8267 7008 3230 0003 5514 8274 BERGSTROM RENEE MARIE EL COOK HARRY W BERBSTROM RANDY HARLOW COOK HELEN M 3025 VANCE ST 3015 WEBSTER ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 7nnA gpan nnna SSl.4 AP9A HAVENS WILLIAM MADISON HAVENS JANIS ANN 3035 UPHAM CT WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 7008 3230 0003 5514 8359 8366 LOMBARDI FRED M&E FINANCIAL LLC LOMBARDI VINCE 200 SPRUCE ST 6537 W. 73RD PL DENVER CO 80230 ARVADA CO 80003 7008 3230 0003 5514 8373 CANJAR MARY J 3055 WEBSTER ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 TENORIO RICK TENORIO ANNETTE 3050 WEBSTER ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 7008 3239 0003 5514 8397 7008 3230 0003 5514 8380 7008 3230 0003 5514 8403 A® City of l Wheat --Midge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29t' Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 CERTIFIED LETTER NOTICE July 9, 2009 Dear Property Owner: This is to inform you of Case No. WA-09-05 which is a request for approval of a 5 foot rear yard setback variance from the 10 foot rear yard setback requirement resulting in a 5 foot rear yard setback AND a 25 foot side yard setback variance from the 30 foot side yard setback requirement when adjacent to a public street resulting in a 5 foot side yard setback on property zoned Residential-One A (R-IA) and located at 2995 Webster Street. This request will be heard by the Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue on July 23, 2009, at 7:00 p.m. As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. Individuals with disabilities are encouraged to participate in all public meetings sponsored by the City of Wheat Ridge. Call Heather Geyer, Public Information Officer at 303-235-2826 at least one week in advance of a meeting if you are interested in participating and need inclusion assistance. If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at 303-235-2846. Thank you. Planning Division. WA0905.doc www.chwheatridgexoxs a aj I $ s a x x a s jEW 2j I ml l I nl I °I al el el °I ml ~I -I ml L i~ G R- L NDINGS - , ,ry n8 s R m oe z x $ - n ^R-1 IR-1 - 2T w]t ST PL n L-Y 1 R y' m LL m _ Ii x `h- r ^ .n {3 F x e snf 'm H'3f T _ _ _ ^ e m` m U ^ m ^ m ^ °n Ze ° n a S a m ^ ~ U a y m ^ A3° ~mH 9L ens x~8 D< w Dz z_ gW ~ m. _ x ^ eR_M ~a~RU 1R- A x aHx~ x x m m m e o W]OTH AVE m N j o ^ m J W 30TH AVE o °8. O mF R n 30TH AVE oL -2 x (n ,y x 3 x 8 rc sots x ~oR wit^ N 3 N z n O z O w W w 0 0 0 O zz z L-L HAYWARD PARK CITY HALL 8 r~ R-2 CUP-951 OFFICIAL W ~I . s ~ W o e z p ~ F- m a ~o m W ~ m 5 ~ N W O $ ZONING MAP - BOUNDARY (D SIGNAOTES OWNERSHIP) WHEAT RIDGE WATER FEATURE COLORADO ' DENOTES MULTIPLE ADDRESSES 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN (APPROXIMATE LOCATION) OEPAFTMENT OF PT ANNINr AND DFVFI OPMFNT SE 26 0 IM 200 300 400 Feet MAP ADOPTED: June 15, 1994 R-2 W o N m a ~ ~ Opppp~OppOp~Opppp~OpFOFp~OpOOpFOOp~ b w W J N N Nw in N J tq U f/1 w l N www wn WO ww ww wwwwwwW wwW Www W W D W n W KKD:KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK~K~K~'KKKKK~O'LL'KU m m m m M M M m m m m M m m m m M M M m m m m m M M M m m M M M m m mMMMMmmmMMMmmmmMMMmmmMMMmmmm~nMMmmmm n o0000o.OOO O OOOOO OOOO OOO00 OOOOO00000 ....momomo..OW°m°m°m°m.WOW°m°m°m°m°m°m°m°m°mm°mm.....W°m°m°W°W°m°m N a N 00000000000000000000000000000000000 wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww c~ C~ c9 C'1 c9 c7 C7 c7 C1 c7 c7 C~ c~ c9 c7 c7 C7 (7 (7 (9 C7 U' c7 C7 c7 c~ c9 U' U' c7 c7 C~ p pppppppopppppppppppppopppppppppppo rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr g Q¢Q¢Q~~ wwww g Q¢ ¢Q¢¢¢¢i~~a¢¢ g¢¢¢ g ~ g g ~ G u u u u u xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 33333333333333333333333333333333333 a n w rrrr>r~rF-rrrr rfrrr> r ,rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNU~L NOINNNNNUNOINNNQ LL'LL'd' K n' d' K KK O: oKOK fY LL' o wwx WWW W W wW WW W w w WW ww r r rWrwrwrrwrrwwwrww~3r3rWWrr~w3wrrm d NOWOWONUNNUNNUUUNUUQNNNNUUNN¢UNUNNN ¢a ww w¢w wwa w p ww w ww www w H 3 a a Q Qaa ¢ aQQ ¢ Q Q Q 333>3>3>33>33»>3»=3333»33»3>33 A A O f O N N O O m N O N N O O O N N O N N O O O N O O N YI O O N O N YI N M M< V N N W n n om000OOO. Ov oo 0 rnrnmooo0o y y . MM m NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNmmmMm mMMMmmmMf~ a 9 ¢ L a 6 O ` a M m m n M M M m M M M m m M m M m m m M ~n M m m M M M m m o m m M mm M m m mOMm aooOo Oan O Oa OOOo N N noooa oOOOOON OO NO O O m m m m m m m m m m 0 W W m m W m W W W m t0 m 6 m m W m. W m m m m w W N a OUOO O O OO O O O OOO O O O O O OO O O OOOO O O O O OO O O N V V N V V V N V V N V V V V V V V V V V V V wwWwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwW W Wwwwwww WWW (~U' U' OU' U' (7 C7 U' U' OU' C7 U' U' U' U' OC7 C7 U' 0000' 000 00 ❑pOpppOppppOppppOOpp~ 00 - ppOpOp❑ Op0 K KK K K KK K K U F O K K RE K RER Cc ERE K ¢ W rr Q r QE rrQ FQ QQ ¢ Q aa < < Ea < a WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWwWWWW WWWQWWW> ~ 3333333~3333333333335353333333¢3330 a r y~ Nd~~NN yhN~Ny r U NNy~ r r f g /1 U t /J f f yyNyNyyNyO lNN www w w wW w Ww W w W w W w W Ww W w' Kw' W W W p WWW NNNW mWNWNNW~NWWW~WWMy NWWNN2WLL'W r~~U e wwWZwZwZWwZwWZZZw ZZ2 pw 0WZZ w wSZrZWw~ 0> ~ > 0 Q 0 w 33 =33 ~ 3> 3 333>3>3>33>33 » >3 » 0 W ONONNOOWNONNOOONNONNNONNONONN OI~NONO N O N m m V V N N W F n W a W 0 O) O O O O O O O O O O O O O 1n O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M m m m m m m m M m m (O m CJ M , a Q rn c A O J Q m w 2 > 2 w ~J y ¢ p Z W g z0 MJ' LL W Z wQ QaU , O W zw Eg r r - N LL Z WNU Zx U' ~ x N~ IZ02 ZLL> z M ¢ ¢ p Z ' N Z J Y y w w~ ' 0 0 Dww W Jw ! N d xm r NZN z w J U J n.Q N W y W J J U N 'm wwm F: r N OLL z ~g gomm =io r 3~ 3 0 a w30 w J W Z Y O D w z < r o o ¢ N W w 3 w ow pr¢ UWJ ~x J Z ¢°Jdx~pD=I LLYN ZJQN M 3w w? ¢0WJY7Q O NZJ WJJwx¢p¢Q333» ~wZJOLL UnU WZ J WZn ¢NW rcoziopaxww~x~N>gz?zo°-<°-X30>QxQ3oo~E~z Di z - y > O (7 N O_' ~ Z O Q o Q LL N ZO Z W W Z J w W Z m W ZO WOW W Q<u mw N Zyy C < W23JLL'K-r nm 33Zw N > R' O ~miN->K~ ~J R'JW~(1JLL Z ¢ o a O 2 ommo mmi w gw S MMWW32mmowi° ,o NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT on July 23, 2009, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building at 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. Individuals with disabilities are encouraged to participate in all public meetings sponsored by the City of Wheat Ridge. Call Heather Geyer, Public Information Officer at 303-235-2826 at least one week in advance of a meeting if you are interested in participating and need inclusion assistance. The following petition shall be heard: Case No. WA-09-04 (continued from June 25.2009): An application filed by Robert Sherman for approval of up to a 10 foot side yard setback variance from the 15 foot side yard setback requirement resulting in a 5 foot side yard setback on property zoned Residential-One (R-1) and located at 3305 Moore Street. Case No. WA-09-05: An application filed by Catherine Snyder for approval of a 5 foot rear yard setback variance from the 10 foot rear yard setback requirement resulting in a 5 foot rear yard setback AND a 25 foot side yard setback variance from the 30 foot side yard setback requirement when adjacent to a public street resulting in a 5 foot side yard setback on property zoned Residential-One A (R-lA) and located at 2995 Webster Street. Kathy Field, Administrative Assistant ATTEST: Michael Snow, City Clerk To be published: Wheat Ridge Transcript Date: July 9, 2009 LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION Community Development Department 7500 West 29a' Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Phone (303) 235-2846 (Please print or type all information) Applicantl~l]~~Prlnr✓A.Snyder Address 299~i WebstereS~ PhoneJ'43F6146 City--y n floe State Co Zip Fax i e2 Owner s'Qme, as aboM. Address Phone Ci State Zip Fax Contact Soome o_boye--) Address Phone City State Zip Fax (The person listed as contact will be contacted to answer questions regarding this application, provide additional information when necessary, post public hearing signs, will receive a copy of the staff report prior to Public Hearing and shall be responsible for forwarding all verbal and written communication to applicant and owner.) Location of request R CJfD Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request) App&caiiou submittal requirements on reverse side ❑ Change of zone or zone conditions ❑ Special Use Permit ❑ Consolidation Plat ❑ Subdivision: Minor (5 lots or less) ❑ Flood Plain Special Exception ❑ Subdivision: Major (More than 5 lots) ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Right of Way Vacation ❑ Planned Building Group ❑ Temporary Use, Building, Sign ❑ Site Development Plan approval R Variance/Waiver (from Section ) ❑ Other: Detailed description of request: 5 l Variance, Required information: Assessors Parcel Number: Size of Lot (acres or square footage): Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning: Current Use: Proposed Use: I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above, without whose consent the requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners must submit power-of-attomey from the owner which approved of this action on his behalf. Signature of 0T. of «rr~~ 20OY expires J~-1 To be filled out by staff: Date received (P L 61 Comp Plan Desig. Related Case No. C ~r FeeS R ipt o CaseNo. IVy -6p-06- Zoning-,~ - Quarter Section M Q/' g_ Pre-App Mtg. Date Case Manager 4k m O W W z w J U z 0 _a ¢w N ~ W~ ~ g w J m w a ❑ w C9 a U Z O a WOO w w 5°Dm U N no 'r. O a a0 O N U f0 ¢UO J 3 am z w ~ ¢ w Z n > 0 Q a J ~ -1 zH p U w O O H fay H m a W H 2 N O W m 'ao w .w El 04 0 b N C a ~ U w rx ~ 60.4. > a r^ O O yy f/~ O F Q iC U a y C o a~i G ~ zu a c~ Y Q N Q v~ M O~ y N 0 N E1 U M'O-d -Ot 1009S ialsgOAk 966Z SZ'SI[ 9z,511 N a o~~No N T LO C d N ~.L N > n f/J "O X ..N. N N a N N C ~ c F, E d N O N o o°a c c c L N N N N U . n: C y=m mmn nm moc E ~`a N L t6 T[A E c p ~.-a O E o mU ` J .ro LOa a mw N E N O m rmi. ¢ £ O H C N w N n n c 0 m c a N C E 0 m W N go rnE4'8 o maa~3am gmom 3aTi~mo oow9 °c Y N ~ tq L N N m a u T rnN~'NE Imo? E L El N N Eom=o N E N N l6 o Em m c y N p- m = N N N C O. E- E o N> E O a C q nL m D Q N N N m > v n t m w a 0 N O w m E u E c U U= c -acNC~°m~ L OEo amOO"° O U N Zm my i.o, o a.m yza a ww~ 2Bg Property appraisal system ( Property 1 Information 1 OF 1 GENERAL INFORMATION Page I of 1 Schedule: 022876 Parcel ID: 39-264-06-007 Pnnt HeIR Status: Active Property Type: Residential Property Address: 02995 WEBSTER ST Owner Name(s) WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 CATHERINE A SNYDER TRUST Mailing Address: SAME ADDRESS AS PROPERTY Neighborhood: 2405 - BARTHS, COULEHAN GRANGE, WHEAT RIDGE AREA PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Subdivision Name: 803200 - WEBSTER GROVE Block Lot Key Section Township Range QuarterSection Land Sqft 0006 26 3 69 11102 Total 11102 Assessor Parcel Maps Associated with Schedule mao39-264 pelf PROPERTYINVENTORY Property Type RESID Design: Ranch Item Quality No. FULL BATH Average 1 3FIX-3/4 BATH Average 1 MAIN FIREPLCE Low 2 MAIN BEDROOM 3 Year Built: 1954 Improvement Number: 1 _ Graphic Parcel Mao MdRQU_es_t Location Adjusted Year Built: 1954 Areas Quality Construction Sqft FIRST FLOOR Average l m 1448 BSMT TOTAL Average 1000 COVERED PORCH Average 559 ATTACH GARAGE Average l m 504 SALE HISTORY Sale Date Sale Amount Deed Type Reception 12-16-1977 13,400 CONVER02_ 01-12-1982 51,800 CONVER0_1_ 02-28-1986 98,500 86021844 11-04-1993 0 Quit Claim Deed 93204133 04-19-2004 0 Warranty Deed F2014319 TAX INFORMATION 2009 Payable 2010 Actual Value Total 235,800 Assessed Value Total 18,770 2008 Payable 2009 Actual Value Total 249,700 Assessed Value Total 19,880 Treasurer Information View Mill Levy Detail For Year 20 2009 Mill Levy Information Tax District 3142 County TBA School TBA WHEAT RIDGE TBA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DIST. TBA URBAN DRAINAGE&FLOOD CONT DIST TBA URBAN DRAINAGE&FLOOD C SO.PLAT TBA WHEATRIDGE FIRE DIST. TBA WHEATRIDGE SAN. DIST. TBA Total TBA 09 F200811 http://www.co.jefferson.co.us/ats/displaygeneral.do?sch=022876&offset=0 6/24/2009 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE 06/25!03 8:33 AN cdbb CATHERINE SNYDER RECEIPT NG:CDB001664 AMOUNT FMSD ZONING APPLICATION F 300.00 d ZONE FMSD ZONING REIMBURSEMENT 180.00 ZREIM PAYMENT RECEIVED AMOUNT CK 1046 480.00 TOTAL 480.00