Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWA-99-067500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215 Wheat Telephone 303/ 237-6944 FAX 303/234-5924 March 30, 1999 Mr. Ronald Ragan 12647 W. 38th Drive Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 RE: WA-99-06 Dear Mr. Ragan: Ridge Please be advised that at its meeting of March 25, 1999, the Board of Adjustment APPROVED your request for a 10' side yard setback variance to the 15' side yard setback requirements to allow for the construction of a bathroom and office addition for the property located at 12647 West 38th Drive. Attached is a copy of the Certificate of Resolution stating the Board's decision which became effective the date of the meeting, March 25, 1999. Should you decide to appeal the decision of the Board, you will need to notify the Jefferson County district court in writing within 30 days of the Board's decision. Please feel free to contact me at (303) 235-2846 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Barbara Delgadillo Planning and Development Secretary /bd cc: WA-99-06 C:\Barbara\BOA\CORRESP\wa9906mgm.wpd CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTION I, Ann Lazzeri, Secretary to the City of Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment, do hereby certify that the following Resolution was duly adopted in the City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado on the 25th day of March, 1999. CASE NO: WA-99-06 APPLICANT'S NAME: Ronald Ragan LOCATION: 12647 West 38th Drive Upon a motion by Board Member ECHELMEYER, seconded by Board Member JUNKER, the following resolution was stated: WHEREAS, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and WHEREAS, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-99-06 is an appeal to this Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and WHEREAS, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law and there were no protests registered against it; and WHEREAS, the relief applied for may be granted without detriment to the public welfare and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-99-06 be, and hereby is, APPROVED. TYPE OF VARIANCE: Ten-foot side yard setback variance to the fifteen-foot side yard setback requirement to allow for construction of a bathroom and office addition. FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: Approval of this request will not be detrimental to the public welfare; and there has been no opposition by the immediate neighbor or anyone else living on the street. 2. The property's dramatic slope to the north does not allow for reasonable development, at least to place the bathroom near the necessary bedrooms. 3. Approval of the request will not impair the adequate supply of light and air to the adjacent property to the east. 4. The adjacent dwelling to the east has a setback of approximately twenty-five feet thus providing approximately thirty feet of separation between structures following the granting of this variance. Board of Adjustment Resolution No. 99-06 Page two (2) VOTE: Yes: ABBOTT, BROWN, ECHELMEYER, HOWARD, JUNKER, THIESSEN No: None Absent: HOVLAND, MAURO DISPOSITION: A ten-foot side yard setback variance to the fifteen-foot side yard setback requirement to allow for construction of a bathroom and office addition was approved. ADOPTED and made effective this 25th day of March, 1999. TOM ABBOTT, Vice Chairman Board of Adjustment Ann Lazzeri, Secretary Board of Adjustment A. Case No. WA-99-06: An application by Ronald Ragan for approval of a 20' side yard variance from the 15' side yard variance requirement for the addition of a bathroom on the east side of the residence. Said property is zoned R-I-and located at 12647 West 38th Drive. The case was presented by Sean McCartney. He reviewed the staff report, presented slides and overhead projections of the subject property; and answered the ten criteria used in considering a variance. All pertinent documents were entered into the record and accepted by Vice Chair ABBOTT. Mr. McCartney concluded that staff found the main basis of the request was due to the increasing needs of a growing family and the extreme topographic condition of the property. For a bathroom addition to be located on the main floor, the side yard is the only option where a room could be constructed without building within the front yard or having to create a major subterranean support. The city has not received any opposition to the application. Ron Ragan 12647 West 38th Avenue Mr. Ragan was sworn in by Vice Chair ABBOTT. He stated that his home has one and one-half bathrooms which is insufficient to meet the needs of his family of two adults and six children. The addition, including the roof pitch, will be finished to match the existing structure. He referred to letters (contained in the Board's packet) from surrounding neighbors indicating their support of the application. In response to a question from Board Member ECHELMEYER, Mr. Ragan stated that the existing foliage (Russian olives, juniper bush and other shrubbery) will remain and serve to screen the addition from the adjacent property. In response to questions from Board Member HOWARD, Mr. Ragan stated that the only entrance to the proposed addition would be from a bedroom. There are two bedrooms and one and one-half bathrooms on the upper level, and the lower level of the house contains two bedrooms and a laundry room. Vice Chair ABBOTT asked if the bathroom could be built on the lower level. Mr. Ragan replied that there is not sufficient room. Board Member THIESSEN stated that she could understand the hardship associated with the need for another bathroom which, by itself, would not require a variance. She expressed concern that the additional office space doesn't constitute a hardship. Board Member ECHELMEYER expressed his approval of the application because it is not detrimental to the neighborhood and there have been no protests against it. Board Member BROWN stated that she was in favor of the application because of the hardship associated with one and one-half bathrooms for six children and the fact that there is no room to add a bath in the basement. Board of Adjustment Page 2 03/25/99 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Minutes of Meeting March 25,1999 1. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by Vice Chair ABBOTT at 7:30 p.m. on March 25, 1999, in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. 2. ROLL CALL Members Present: Tom Abbott Michelle Brown Bill Echelmeyer Bob Howard Susan Junker Karen Thiessen Members Absent: Paul Hovland Linda Mauro Staff Present: Sean McCartney, Planner Ann Lazzeri, Secretary Vice Chair ABBOTT introduced Michelle Brown as the new Board of Adjustment member representing District Two. The following is the official set of Board of Adjustment minutes for the Public Hearing of March 25, 1999. A set of these minutes is retained both in the office of the City Clerk and in the Department of Planning and Development of the City of Wheat Ridge. 3. APPROVE THE ORDER OF THE AGENDA It was moved by Board Member JUNKER and seconded by Board Member THIESSEN that the order of the agenda be approved. The motion passed by a vote of 6-0 with Board Members HOVLAND and MAURO absent. 4. PUBLIC FORUM (This is the time for anyone to speak on any subject not appearing on the agenda.) There was no one signed up to speak. 5. PUBLIC HEARING Board of Adjustment Page 1 03/25/99 Vice Chair ABBOTT stated that he believed the application was reasonable because the proposed addition would still allow thirty feet between structures and would not be detrimental to the neighborhood. Upon a motion by Board Member ECHELMEYER and second by Board Member JUNKER, the following resolution was stated: Whereas, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and Whereas, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-99-06 is an appeal to this Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and Whereas, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law, and there were no protests registered against it; and Whereas, the relief applied for may be granted without detriment to the public welfare and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge. Now, therefore, be it resolved that Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-99-06 be, and hereby is, approved. Type of Variance: A ten-foot side yard setback variance to the fifteen-foot side yard setback requirement to allow for construction of a bathroom and office addition. For the following reasons: Approval of this request will not be detrimental to the public welfare; and there has been no opposition by the immediate neighbor or anyone else living on the street. 2. The property's dramatic slope to the north does not allow for reasonable development, at least to place the bathroom near the necessary bedrooms. 3. Approval of the request will not impair the adequate supply of light and air to the adjacent property to the east. Vice Chair ABBOTT offered an amendment to the motion to list an additional reason as follows: "The adjacent dwelling to the east has a setback of approximately twenty-five feet thus providing approximately thirty feet of separation between structures following the granting of this variance." The amendment was accepted by Board Members ECHELMEYER and JUNKER and the motion passed by a vote of 6-0 with Board Members HOVLAND and MAURO absent. Vice Chair ABBOTT advised the applicant that his request had been approved. Board of Adjustment Page 3 03/25/99 B. Case No. WA-99-08: An application by Tom Moran Construction for a five-foot front yard variance from the 30-foot front yard setback requirement for the addition of a sunroom. Said property is zoned R-1B and located at 14595 West 38th Place. The case was presented by Sean McCartney. He reviewed the staff report, presented slides and overhead projections of the subject property; and answered the ten criteria used in considering a variance. All pertinent documents were entered into the record and accepted by Vice Chair ABBOTT. He concluded that staff has found there may be evidence of a physical hardship attributed to the subject property; however, the face remains that the request for a sunroom is based purely on luxury and convenience rather than an every day need. the owner would legally be able to construct an open-sided covered patio which could encroach eight feet into the established from yard setback without the need for a variance. In answer to a question from Vice Chair ABBOTT, Mr. McCartney stated that the power of attorney matter had been resolved. Monte Zufeldt 9661 West 64th Place, Arvada Mr. Zufeldt was sworn in by Vice Chair ABBOTT. He is employed by Room With a View Sunrooms. He was appearing on behalf of the owner, Jan Orcholoski, who was not able to attend the hearing because of poor health. He explained that Mr. Orcholoski is severely handicapped and that a handicap ramp will also be installed. He stated there is no other location for the sunroom. Board Member ECHELMEYER stated that he observed several other residences in the immediate area that have similar front yard setbacks and felt the addition of the sunroom would not distract from the neighborhood. Vice Chair ABBOTT stated that the request does not meet the criteria other than for the handicap issue. He would like a doctor's statement that the applicant would benefit from the addition of a sumoom. Board Member JUNKER believed the small size of the lot constituted a hardship. Board Member THIESSEN stated that she would be more comfortable with a doctor's statement. Board Member HOWARD stated that the addition would be an improvement to the neighborhood and he would have no objection to the application. Board Member BROWN agreed that there was a hardship in that there is no other place to add the sunroom and felt the addition would also be an improvement to the neighborhood. Board of Adjustment Page 4 03/25/99 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO: Board of Adjustment DATE OF MEETING: March 25, 1999 CASE NO. & NAME: WA-99-06/ Ragan DATE PREPARED: March 17, 1999 CASE MANAGER: Sean McCartney ACTION REQUESTED: Request for a 10' side yard setback variance to the 15' side yard setback requirement to allow for the construction of a bathroom and office addition. LOCATION OF REQUEST: 12647 West 38t' Drive NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT: Ronald Ragan 12647 West 38' Drive Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER: Same APPROXIMATE AREA: PRESENT ZONING: PRESENT LAND USE: SURROUNDING ZONING: SURROUNDING LAND USE: DATE PUBLISHED: DATE POSTED: DATED LEGAL NOTICES SENT: ENTER INTO RECORD: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (X) ZONING ORDINANCE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS O OTHER 13958 square feet Residential-One Single-family residential N: Planned Commercial Development; W: E: Residential-One, and S: Residential-One A N: Office Professional, W:, S: and E: Single-family residential February 5, 1999 February 11, 1999 February 1, 1999 (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIAL SLIDES (X) EXHIBITS JURISDICTION: The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. A-1 I. REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a 10' side yard setback variance to the 15' side yard setback requirement to allow for a bedroom and bathroom addition on the east side of the property. If approved, the addition will be approximately 5' from the eastern property line. The applicant has proposed the room addition to provide additional bathroom space for a growing family. The applicant currently has 6 children living in a 4 bedroom house, with only 1-1/2 bathrooms. He has stated that it is becoming increasingly difficult to operate a daily schedule with such limited bathroom space. According to the applicant, the room addition on the east side of the property is the only option without going up with a second floor. Staff asked the applicant why he decided to place the addition on the east side of the property. The applicant stated that he believed this was the only option left on the property due to the dramatic slope of the property has from south to north. Staff stated that, according to the attached survey, there seemed to be some buildable space on the southeast corner of the building. A structure built on the southeast corner of the building could be placed to comply with the established 30' front yard setback. The applicant stated that he would rather not locate the addition in the front yard because he did not want to disrupt the character of the locality, being that most houses in the neighborhoods allow for at least 30' front yard setbacks. ammigir t io Pursuant to Section 26-10(F) of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, structures located in the Residential-One zone district must retain a minimum 15' setback from the side property lines. II. SITE PLAN The property in question is located on the western most section of Wheat Ridge. It currently has an 8T lot width on the south part of the property (front) and 145' of lot width along the rear of the property (north). Therefore the property was platted in a pie-shaped configuration. 7th Si-lApr-_D The property is located on the north side of West 38°i Drive, and runs parallel to an existing bluff that immediately drops approximately 60' down on the north side of the property. This topographic condition is noticed throughout the property. The south elevation of the building (front) shows the structure as a single story residence. However, due to the topography of the property, the north elevation (rear) of the building is actually a two-story structure, which currently has a walk out basement. Therefore, the applicant believes that the only development opportunity for the sight is either on the east side of the property or within the front yard area on the south east corner of the property. As the survey shows, the existing structure has 15' setbacks from both property lines. There is a church located to the west of the property in question and there is an existing single-family residence on the property to the east. The adjacent structure to the east is approximately 30' from the eastern property line. Therefore, approval of this request would still allow for adequate separation of the structures. Board of Adjustment WA-99-06 Page 2 4- III. VARIANCE CRITERIA Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a variance request: 1. Can the property in question yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located? Yes. If the request is denied, the structure may continue to be used as a single-family residence. The purpose of the request is purely for additional bathroom space for an 8 person family. 2. Is the plight of the owner due to unique circumstances? No. There aren't any unique circumstances attributed with this request. 3. If the variation were granted, would it alter the essential character of the locality? Yes. Because there aren't any other side yard encroachments in the general vicinity, approval of this request could alter the essential character of the locality. However, because the addition will be located on the side of the property, where there are several large, mature trees to allow for the addition to blend in with the existing structure. 4. Would the particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved result in a particular hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out? Yes. As the attached photos show, the property slopes down hill from south the north. The backyard of the property (north) has been terraced to allow for a level area, then it slopes dramatically down to the property to the north. Therefore, due to the dramatic slope of the property, the side yard seems to be the only option for an addition (unless a second floor is built). 5. Would the conditions upon which the petition for a variation is based be applicable, generally, to the other property within the same zoning classification? Yes. All applications are reviewed on a case-by-case basis thereby changing the outcome for each request. 6. Is the purpose of the variation based exclusively upon a desire to make money out of the property? No. The purpose of this request is to allow for an additional bathroom for an 8 person family. Currently the residence provides 1 '/2 baths within the two-story structure, and the other living space is devoted to bedrooms and other family rooms. Board of Adjustment WA-99-06 Page 3 1''-3 7. Has the alleged difficulty or hardship been created by any person presently having an interest in the property? Yes. The applicant, who has interest in the property, has created a self-imposed hardship in that he may be able to do some creative interior planning that may allow for the additional bathroom space. 8. Would the granting of the variations be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located? No. Even though there aren't any other side yard setback encroachments within the neighborhood, approval of this variance should not be detrimental to the public welfare. Also, because the addition is planned for the east side of the property, and the adjacent residential structure to the east is located approximately 30' from the adjoining property line, approval of the request should not be injurious to any future improvements for the adjacent property to the east. 9. Would the proposed variation impair the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion in the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. No. Because the request is for a room addition to be placed 5' from the eastern property line, and the adjacent residential structure is at least 30' from the adjoining property line, approval of this request should allow for adequate supply of light and air to the adjacent property. Also, because the request is for a bathroom addition for the current residents of the dwelling units, approval of this request should not increase the congestion in the nearby public streets. 10. If it is found in criteria 8 and 9 above that granting of the variation would not be detrimental or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood, and it is also found that public health and safety, public facilities and surrounding property values would not be diminished or impaired, then would the granting of the variance result in a benefit or contribution to the neighborhood or the community as distinguished from an individual benefit on the part of the applicant, or would granting of the variance result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities? No. This request is solely for the benefit of the homeowner and should not benefit the neighborhood or community. IV. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION Staff has found that the main basis of this request is due to the increasing needs of a growing family and based on the extreme topographic condition of the property. For a bathroom addition to be located on the main floor, the side yard is the only option for where a room could be located without building within the front yard or having to create a major subterranean support. Board of Adjustment WA-99-06 Page 4 A V. RECOMMENDED MOTIONS Option A: "I move that Case No. WA-99-06, a request for approval of a 10' side yard setback variance to the 15' side yard setback requirement to allow for the construction of a bathroom and office addition for a property zoned Residential-One and located at 12647 West 38' Place, be APPROVED for the following reasons: 1. Approval of this request will not be detrimental to the public's welfare. 2. The properties dramatic slope does not allow for many development opportunities. 3. Approval of the request will not impair the adequate supply of light and air to the adjacent property to the east." Option 13: "I move that Case No. WA-99-06, a request for approval of a 10' side yard setback variance to the 15' side yard setback requirement to allow for the construction of a bathroom and office addition for a property zoned Residential-One and located at 12647 West 38' Place, be DENIED for the following reasons: 1. The request is based on a self-imposed hardship. 2. There may be a creative interior design solution that would allow for the creation of more space for an additional bathroom." EAWCa ney\case fi1es\wa9906.wpd Board of Adjustment WA-99-06 Page 5 1 WZ-00-19 PGD PLAZA R- PGD ,Vz-o Am m ~S~ aJM mW ~ Ne CI -",I nA ~ Wz 2- Wz Y-4 APPL23400C> vI ee SHOPPM C@I AI~A~181T 4 oG- ~ nPEE.-90-1 OFF I G AL_ ZONE DISTRICT BUNDRY ZONING MAP -PARCEL/LOT BOUNDRY (DESIGNATES OWNERSHIP) I,~ `HE `T RIDGE - -CITY LIMIT LINE nI nQ A Ian DENOTES MULTIPLE ADDRESSES )HAP ADOPTED: June 15, 1994 Last Revision: February 20, 1998 ATFENT OF PLANNING AW DEVI3,OPFENT - 255-2852 0 z L ,--.w R-G a m I NX 21~ rrxrx o® SCALE 1'=100 14J.12 > 0 5.0 SCALE: 1" =20'-0" West 38th Drive ADDITION: 552.38 SQ. FT. (PERIMETER: 99'-8 15/16") STREET ADDRESS: 12647 WEST 38TH DRIVE, WHEATRIDGE, CO. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 1, BLOCK 1 RIDGE SUBDIVISION, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO P-7 K and Rmald Ragan tt 7 We5[38th Dave M~WheatRidge;Colorado Y~'= ^`USA 80033 ~ r z -ad FtZoNr Et~/671U11 " LovKitl[~ 1~oCZM'F-65(" A_g t~zohYr ~t~/drlotJ - LonluN~ 11nR1~- 120-ACt fl- VQt100 - tae cKYAt2D ( 6ool4N[4 Ws') From The Desk or Ronald and Kim Ragan 12647 West 38° Drive Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Phone(303)424-1920 Fax (303) 432-9603 raganjetstream@n worldnet.att.net February 15, 1999 Department of Planning and Development 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 REF: Application for Variance 12647 West 38th Drive Gentlemen, Please find enclosed our application, copy of deed, plot survey, and plot plan noting the variance proposal for your reference and review. Also, we have enclosed several photographs of our residence for your consideration. As our six children have rapidly become teenagers, we are under hardship in that our current living quarters have outgrown bathroom facilities for all of us to enjoy. Our four pre-adult daughters occupy our two facilities ninety nine percent of the time thus creating a difficult situation for those of us maintaining a timely work schedule. We request your kindest consideration in approving a variance allowing us to build an additional bathroom adjacent to our master bedroom giving all involved piece of mind. Pursuant to our request, it is not feasible to remodel the existing interior or to build on the west side of our garage. As our home was constructed on a slab, all plumbing and drain connections are concealed within the floor joist system. The only reasonable and just location is to extend the east side several feet, tying into the existing drain line running in close proximity to the master bedroom. Our only neighbor's residence is set back thirty feet from our property line with a graveled drive between the properties. Therefore, building on the proposed location will not be a hindrance or obstruction in any nature. We have contacted our neighbors, reviewing our proposed plan, and have attached their approval by signature for your judgement. The proposed construction will not be visible from the street frontage, as the eight-foot shrubs will remain in tact as well as all of the existing juniper trees. All construction will be executed and performed in strict accordance to the codes enforced by the City of Wheat Ridge with all-exterior walls, roof pitch and shingles matching the exact format of the existing structure. It is with our appreciation in advance of your consideration. nicer ly~~ i~~ i7~ From The Desk or Ronald and Kim Ragan 12647 west 38" 136ve Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Phone(303)424-1920 Fax (303) 432-9603 ragan.ietstream& orldnet.att.net February 15, 1999 Department of Plaunning and Development 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 REF: Application for Variance 12647 West 38`x' Drive Gentlemen, Pursuant to our enclosed application for variance, we have reviewed our proposed plot plan and building requirements with our neighbors both adjacent and across the street. By signature below, our neighbors fully understand, have granted approval and offer their mutual consent regarding the proposed addition to our residence. Mr. and Mrs. Eli Gonzales 12668 West 38th Drive Wheat Ridge, Colorado L4 &I, - L ,----y----°=date- r°~--`f - - - date------------- Ms. Alberta Kampman 12627 West 38`h Drive Wheat Ridge, Colorado ( dateX:, ZL Ronald and Kim Ragan 4-11 RECORD AND RETURN TO: FirstBank of Wheat Ridge, N.A. 4350 Wadsworth Boulevard Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 g- I 1 3052842 Ragan [Space Above This Line For Recording Data] DEED OF TRUST THIS DEED OF TRUST ("Security Instrument") is made on AUGUST 20, 1996 among the grantor, Ronald T. Ragan and Rim Ragan, Joint Tenants ('Borrower"), the Public Trustee of Jefferson County ("Trustee"), and the beneficiary, FirstBank of Wheat Ridge, N.A. and whose addressis 4350 Wadsworth Boulevard, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 which is organized and existing under the laws of the United States ("Lender"). Borrower owes Lender the principal sum of ONE HUNDRED THIRTY-FOUR THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED SEVENTY-FO AND 65100 Dollars (U.S. $ 134, 274.65 This debt is evidenced by Borrower's note dated the same date as this Security Instrument ("Note"), which provides for monthly payments, with the full debt, if not paid earlier, due and payable on SEPTEMBER 1, 2026 This Security Instrument secures to Lender: (a) the repayment of the debt evidenced by the Note, with interest, and all renewals, extensions and modifications of the Note; (b) the payment of all other sums, with interest, advanced under paragraph 7 to protect the security of this Security Instrument; and (c) the performance of Borrower's covenants and agreements under this Security Instrument and the Note. For this purpose, Borrower, in consideration of the debt and the trust herein created, irrevocably grants and conveys to Trustee, in trust, with power of sale, the following described property located in Jefferson County, Colorado: Lot 1, Block 1, RIDGE SUBDIVISION, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado. Together with all water and water rights of any type which are appurtenant to the property or which are or may be used on or in connection with the property at the present time or any time hereafter including, but not limited to the following: adjudicated water rights and decrees and priorities therefor; unadjudicated water rights and appropriations; rights in water from tributary and nontributary sources, whether surface or underground; conditional water rights; rights to existing under well permits issued by the State Engineer or other federal, state or municipal authorities; rights and permits and designated ground water basins; all rights claimed under contract, exchange, or plans or augmentation; all ditches, canals, reservoirs, pipelines, tunnels, wells and other structures for diverting and conveying water and all rights of way and easements therefor; and all shares of stock or other instruments evidencing any or all rights to any such water herein described. which has the address of 12647 West 38th Drive, Wheat Ridge [Street, City], Colorado 80033 ('Property Address"); [Zip Code] COLORADO-Single Family-Fannie Mae/Freddie Mae UNIFORM INSTRUMENT -6R(CO) (92o9) VMP MORTGAGE FORMS - (313)293-8100- (800)521-7291 C03006 (3-2-94) Distributed by FormAtion Technologies, Inc. - (800)937-3799 Page 1 of 6 Form 3006 1/91 Amended 5/91 ~EArP LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION ~E wEATP o o Planning and Development Department " "C = 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Phone(303)235-2-40 o:oRro~ (Please print or type all information) ~Riy~ Phone Applicant O A4b 171-16,41V Address Ao2lo-V7/~/c5: 38 ~v?y-/920 ~/i) City Owner 6 ~,41e,1E Address Phone City y~ Location of request (address) ~°2~y ~dJi2lUE Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions liste d below which pertain to your request.) ❑ Change of zone or zone conditions Variance / Waiver ❑ Site development plan approval Nonconforming use change ❑ Special Use Permit ❑ Flood plain special exception ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Interpretation of Code ❑ Temporary Use, Buildings, Signs ❑ Lot line Adjustment ❑ Minor Subdivision (5 lots or less) ❑ Planned Building Group ❑ Subdivision (More than 5 lots) ❑ Street Vacation ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final J~ ❑ Other: Detailed description of the request: eS45r -S/ Fill out the following information to the best of your knowledge. Current Zoning: 19-1 Size of Lot (acres or squaroo gage): f Current use: Iafe Proposed use: SIMti Assessors Parcel Number: 1 certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above,' without whose consen e requ ted action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners must submit power-of-atto e om t e o n ch a roved of this action on his behalf. Signa -T '4Subscribed and sworn to me this 72~- day oT-n-h-, 19 2s ep4 Public ° 4360Wadsworih80ulev commission expires 43VOWadsworthl ' e d o R 9Com Rf~Cot ° Date re o ` Receipt No. 000(x%9 Case No. *Aftl WqqTb Related Case No. Zoning R'I Quarter Section Map h1W2,q adoe0033 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT on March 25,1999, at 7:30 p.m. at 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. The following petitions shall be heard: 1. ase No. WA-99-06 : An application by Ronald Ragan for approval of a 10' side yard variance from the 15' side yard variance requirement for the addition of a bathroom on the east side of the residence. Said property is zoned R-1 and located at 12647 West 38' Drive. 2. Case No. WA-99-08: An application by Tom Moran Construction for a 5' front yard variance from the 30' front yard setback requirement for the addition of a sunroom. Said property is zoned R-1B and located at 10595 West 381 Place. Barbara Delgadillo, Re ding Secretary ATTEST: Wanda Sang, City Clerk To be Published: Wheat Ridge Transcript Date: March 5, 1999 C:TB b.\BOA\PUBHRGS\990325.wpd 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE March 4, 1999 Dear Property Owner: WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80215 The City of X W HEAT RO Wheat a ,m GRidge cOZ O R NID This is to inform you that Case No. WA-99-06 which is a request for approval to allow a 10' side yard setback variance from the 15' side yard setback requirement for the addition of a bathroom on the east side of property located at 12647 West 38`h Drive will be heard by the Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue. The meeting will be held on March 25, 1999, at 7:30 p.m. All owners and/or their representative of the parcel under consideration must be present at this hearing. As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to notify any other persons whose presence is desired at this hearing. If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2846. Thank you. Planning Division. C:\Barbara\BOA\PUBHRC S\wa9906cen.wpd (303) 234-5900 • ADMINISTRATION FAX: 234-5924 POLICE DEPARTMENT FAX: 235-2949 a d d N N N ~ C ~ d N Q ~ ~ C Y > ' d a ~ ~ Q a C ~ Z W ~ WI ~ d ~ C 7 ' a I I 0' > d' N C y yl E 0 a 0 m t 0 O N E p 0.0 m w as a - y'C _ U N~ d R O ~ O W O W O ~ O T O m X N U 3 6 m°$ 3 3 3 3 3 u O a E N O N O O lp O N> O o O ° O ° w O m E m0 . m m0 ~0 HO m t° U m U ca m U' v d y m y a Yt0 85 0 Msc ~jZ 0 0 m rn0 .t0 m , 0 a'~O ¢ U YY~.--O 0 N D 0 N a N N N i c 0 s N ~ ~ 0 0 d ro} c d J on v d m m O Q a2i .-o ¢ m2ia a C w n '~SNK ~ a 4: rn~ a ~o~ E>-o in 2 m o.'.N-O A -p y rK r m m c r m m m M m m v M O° m l v _ - V~ c~m10 d ~ O ' a nit N= ~ g L Wes c- a r ~ 0 = i Y s N O a o 3 ~ ~ i K Vl jA N Q E 0 E O N H 0Uci~oW E ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ z a U < o r r r m r m r o m m p `o m rn m m m rn 0 m rn m m rn m E m m n m n m °r m n rn W O U z w Z wa o x~o > O U- N Oda Z a Z S A Z H ~ I J n a . C .O d O a P a z„ H ~ v a m U d P. O z ro F t= O cn d c~ t~ II cn I\D cn Co IV O Co O s r-~ UD s 00 a 25.b Fj N O. ~ p ll~ r--d 'Q, 05 2 - m A n Z n N P a. - N t~7 x co Vl O T y N C/) co i--1 f-ri • N N Z'N O"OZt C~ Z ~ o O r o ~ ~ o 0 rn x I rn 0 m ~a O\ om I a-1 \ O N O (_7 0- 0 Q Q O J O U F O' -1 U D z O O t W 2 (D w V) (D z O W 0Qr z,0 u O'r F a. u cu w,.m c` - 1 T y q FF o O U w r U O da d q N a ~ 0.1 ° H o q d O G 0 9o T ° N q C7 O O cL q u H wo a N b b 0 a w O z w O C m 0 ai F a q 0 m a d m O w° O G 0 rn rn N z o O N u1 u1 U1 D\ ~ m rn rn \ a o 0 00 C v N O E O N A m a pi N ~ N N N o m n w g N o H P. v w o x G FG W rn cn ti W a ~s o m ao o a a 0 T O ~ F, o H T o ~ O c O N D ~ (y w A N N sD 3 y 0 7 V w as F d o q a a T U 7 y o H U d v m C y W m y W y~JTJ- N N w ~ y m U ys :a C y r N U a. s+ d H W W m w Ix. w m a N p. ~ O q 6 z w C7 A a xw 3 W O z pq E P4 W+ E W `o 34 w x ctl N V a.~ N l~ m U) 6 ro m I tx w m ra f t 0, k o 0 O T U a° U wo °L a o ~ d E w ~ p d b 0 3 y N MOl A ~ Hh a w 9 U 1 g 0 c W 0 V 0 ca O m W a F4 oh 7 a a ❑ wO Fr o ~3.F 3 ~ .o A o a~ c I ° a v T C N H N A d°^ q N « y U~ y N y_ N U q y y 6 y « ° s~'e3o aS C m y O G m ~ pa c°a«'o8~~~ N as o~d•a`oo c Ca N OM O b N y R 00 r N C ro c4 aoom3.a°',~ O m r a~ C r°ii d'C O. C A aEi 0 b.2 a'O Tow a C C m y Ab CO ~~°ivA m o a aa° 9b ` a v m w «U m7s;"«•o m y w o y° (o E Os b«q °C 0°0' a; q y y q q r 0 0 v w w ~ CN ~ p~ d T •C ti 0 C7 ~ ~ 'a o ~ m 7 a ~ y~ F~ yos N C O C a O N 4N C ~O U ° U p y v X09 F- Ia CF 15 21 m p a p°° Q a to a+ w `y ~ w W' d ~y 6 ~ ~ e$'"W a.~ ~vaa°i vi h-~hy~a. ~a❑q W°~ w a F~ ro~ d xF«aa >m„ W C o W w .3 ~ N~ ~ y Sap sz'$o~nN A m ~ d o 3 ~ v 0 e/y 0 w~ LU ¢a =r+Ow m C ~Oa m g ~ y N 7 7y\ W p~ C/J LL O T 7 U v 0 U w 0 ti °o nT a o b 8 m o a w I'" U o a y a ' o m_ a ~ F a y 0 a ° o « ~ C O W O z o O ~ q ❑ w a q p a W ° q a a o z a U d w c a ~ z G w o a a x z 3 D I 1 ZO•UO z w WAE nQ4V x H 3 0 E Z Jt q ~ .f F E C T1 E-4 n a` rn I N z o, 1 wW CWZ C ti m A x (z~ U E W N 00 0. WO~WOW CH m Cl~ cC~ O o: U O ~ w d" P+ a' W W U H CD O ~7~7 O S0 W N W 0.'w H ZO C4 N ~RGG o a 7 0.i C c~ h S I O m}~ HH V~2GU][~i~iEniM D J j ~v J 3 W.Q]zOwa H aau01 E b 1- S H ; O F6 W U UO a S wrA U oz Cd t ONO N aei 3 8 r S W2U=O=ZW WZ" a H. p1 3 } Z S z HwzwUFHmx co C7~na HEW> zdHa w a z N (J L + H a W wo>+HH W w W=~ o y i• Ua ;~3 N J >H Zm U°xoEac}Z. y S I i U, z a H ¢ 6 E U Ln In LO o H d'Q r d d I s iT f _ Q uH' H~zW S~~2 wo ZO ' 1/ W 4o J~ Zo ' ) 6CHFOC 6 y W W Z OOMF WM, 2Cz7 O C Z pa 6HH~U OHG mto w 0 M ~l --e El U4' In M F U En 0) Mw A W W W f-• i MW E w m J I z N e O W, O;> C~xUjy6 vml/l V a~~ co S 6 z aCO E-4U OCwac0..£ - - m H3 Cz, F 10 MAI OR ET 04 - I W E x 2 w 0 6 A z E¢o5r~a wawa H p H E 5 w W W U .,.e'. O Ga W. 9 2= H W -Cnpl H" M.. g Y U H F W •E ECR.O z co chi ~z+ W. E W 20Oa2A ~ C S 9 °l m H o C E H a ~--i m m 6 m I N W H a Hr•f .~4H W L]m m 6 p II G U 2 OU a2 U E z C H W O H ,p7 m w OW 2C1CC d tr; O W Cw?OUw = E W oW cUi)5 pF•, aLL 11 F r 6 3 W -E-P W H ~J w a o (.7 W o awoowFq Ci aG w 6 x H a s W r Z C U H o h O I C U' O. G' H= x 0 d a w w 6} o E W = OHO W m6xx Z'.Z.] NM yl m a H ~Er~7 t-y6H~-+W FEH6www a Case No.: ryypgg06 Quarter Section Map No.: NW29 App: Last Name: Ra an Related Cases: App: First Name: Ronald _ Case History: 10' side yard variance from i Owner: Last Name: he 15' requirement to ame 7771 construct an additional bathroom. Owner: First Name: ~ App Address: 12647 West 38th Drive Review Body: City, State Zip: heat Ridge, CO 80033_) App: Phone: 303-4244920 APN' Owner Address: ame 2nd Review Body: City/State/Zip: 2nd Review Date: Owner Phone: Decision-making Body: Board of Ad)'ustment i Project Address: 12647 Approval/Denial Date: 3/25/1999_,_,____ Street Name: est 38th Drive City/State, Zip: Res./Ordinance No.: es Case Disposition: pproved Conditions of Approval: None. Project Planner: IMcCartnne District: III _ File Location: Closed Date Received: J Notes: _J I Pre-App Date: Follow-Up: Wo o p „„2 a .