The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWA-99-087500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215 Wheat Telephone 303/ 237-6944 FAX 303/234-5924 March 30, 1999 Tom Moran Construction Attn. Herb Kelly 3250 Oakland Street, #G Aurora, CO 80010 RE: WA-99-08 Dear Mr. Kelly: Ridge Please be advised that at its meeting of March 25, 1999, the Board of Adjustment APPROVED your request for a 5' front yard setback variance to the 30' front yard setback requirement for the property located at 10595 West 38" Place. Attached is a copy of the Certificate of Resolution stating the Board's decision which became effective the date of the meeting, March 25, 1999. Should you decide to appeal the decision of the Board, you will need to notify the Jefferson County district court in writing within 30 days of the Board's decision. Please feel free to contact me at (303) 235-2846 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Barbara Delgadillo Planning and Development Secretary /bd cc: Janina Orcholski 10595 W. 38`h Place Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 WA-99-08 C:\Barb=\BOA\CORRESF ~wa9908moran.wpd CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTION I, Ann Lazzeri, Secretary to the City of Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment, do hereby certify that the following Resolution was duly adopted in the City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado on the 25th day of March, 1999. CASE NO: WA-99-08 APPLICANT'S NAME: Tom Moran Construction LOCATION: 10595 West 38th Place Upon a motion by Board Member ECHELMEYER, seconded by Board Member BROWN, the following resolution was stated: WHEREAS, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and WHEREAS, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-99-08 is an appeal to this Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and WHEREAS, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law and there were no protests registered against it; and WHEREAS, the relief applied for may be granted without detriment to the public welfare and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-99-08 be, and hereby is, APPROVED. TYPE OF VARIANCE: Five-foot front yard setback variance to the thirty-foot front yard setback requirement. FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: Approval of this request will not be detrimental to the public welfare. 2. the property is located on the comer of two public right-of-ways and was platted with only a 65-foot depth. 3. Approval of the request will not impair the adequate supply of light and air to the adjacent property to the east. An extension on the front side of this property is fairly much in keeping with just about every house on the street with the exception of the immediate neighbor. Board of Adjustment Resolution No. 99-08 Page two (2) This approval is tentative depending upon a letter from the occupant's physician indicating a true handicap hardship does exist, and the Board grants authority to the staff to accept or not accept the applicability of the physician's letter to this case. VOTE: Yes: ABBOTT, BROWN, ECHELMEYER, HOWARD, JUNKER, THIESSEN No: None Absent: HOVLAND, MAURO DISPOSITION: A five-foot front yard setback variance to the thirty-foot front yard setback requirement was approved. ADOPTED and made effective this 25th day of March, 1999. TOM ABBOTT, Vice Chairman Board of Adjustment Ann Lazzeri, Secretary Board of Adjustment ~ e B. Case No. WA-99-08: An application by Tom Moran Construction for a five-foot front yard variance from the 30-foot front yard setback requirement for the addition of a sunroom. Said property is zoned R-1B and located at 10595 West 38th Place. The case was presented by Sean McCartney. He reviewed the staff report, presented slides and overhead projections of the subject property; and answered the ten criteria used in considering a variance. All pertinent documents were entered into the record and accepted by Vice Chair ABBOTT. He concluded that staff has found there may be evidence of a physical hardship attributed to the subject property; however, the face remains that the request for a sunroom is based purely on luxury and convenience rather than an every day need. the owner would legally be able to construct an open-sided covered patio which could encroach eight feet into the established from yard setback without the need for a variance. In answer to a question from Vice Chair ABBOTT, Mr. McCartney stated that the power of attorney matter had been resolved. Monte Zufeldt 9661 West 64th Place, Arvada Mr. Zufeldt was sworn in by Vice Chair ABBOTT. He is employed by Room With a View Sunrooms. He was appearing on behalf of the owner, Jan Orcholoski, who was not able to attend the hearing because of poor health. He explained that Mr. Orcholoski is severely handicapped and that a handicap ramp will also be installed. He stated there is no other location for the sunroom. Board Member ECHELMEYER stated that he observed several other residences in the immediate area that have similar front yard setbacks and felt the addition of the sunroom would not distract from the neighborhood. Vice Chair ABBOTT stated that the request does not meet the criteria other than for the handicap issue. He would like a doctor's statement that the applicant would benefit from the addition of a sunroom. Board Member JUNKER believed the small size of the lot constituted a hardship. Board Member THIESSEN stated that she would be more comfortable with a doctor's statement. Board Member HOWARD stated that the addition would be an improvement to the neighborhood and he would have no objection to the application. Board Member BROWN agreed that there was a hardship in that there is no other place to add the sunroom and felt the addition would also be an improvement to the neighborhood. Board of Adjustment Page 4 03/25/99 Vice Chair ABBOTT stated that he believed the application was reasonable because the proposed addition would still allow thirty feet between structures and would not be detrimental to the neighborhood. Upon a motion by Board Member ECHELMEYER and second by Board Member JUNKER, the following resolution was stated: Whereas, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and Whereas, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-99-06 is an appeal to this Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and Whereas, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law, and there were no protests registered against it; and Whereas, the relief applied for may be granted without detriment to the public welfare and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge. Now, therefore, be it resolved that Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-99-06 be, and hereby is, approved. Type of Variance: A ten-foot side yard setback variance to the fifteen-foot side yard setback requirement to allow for construction of a bathroom and office addition. For the following reasons: Approval of this request will not be detrimental to the public welfare; and there has been no opposition by the immediate neighbor or anyone else living on the street. 2. The property's dramatic slope to the north does not allow for reasonable development, at least to place the bathroom near the necessary bedrooms. 3. Approval of the request will not impair the adequate supply of light and air to the adjacent property to the east. Vice Chair ABBOTT offered an amendment to the motion to list an additional reason as follows: "The adjacent dwelling to the east has a setback of approximately twenty-five feet thus providing approximately thirty feet of separation between structures following the granting of this variance." The amendment was accepted by Board Members ECHELMEYER and JUNKER and the motion passed by a vote of 6-0 with Board Members HOVLAND and MAURO absent. Vice Chair ABBOTT advised the applicant that his request had been approved. Board of Adjustment Page 3 03/25/99 Upon a motion by Board Member ECHELMEYER and second by Board Member BROWN the following resolution was stated: Whereas, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and Whereas, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-99-08 is an appeal to this Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and Whereas, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law, and there were no protests registered against it; and Whereas, the relief applied for may be granted without detriment to the public welfare and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge. Now, therefore, be it resolved that Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-99-08 be, and hereby is, approved. Type of Variance: A five-foot front yard setback variance to the thirty-foot front yard setback requirement. For the Following Reasons: Approval of this request will not be detrimental to the public welfare. 2. The property is located on the corner of two public right-of-ways and was platted with only a 65' depth. Approval of the request will not impair the adequate supply of light and air to the adjacent property to the east. 4. An extension on the front side of this property is fairly much in keeping with just about every house on the street with the exception of the immediate neighbor. This approval is tentative depending upon a letter from the occupant's physician indicating a true handicap hardship does exist. The Board grants authority to the staff to accept or not accept the applicability of the physician's letter to this case. The motion passed by a vote of 6-0 with Board Members HOVLAND and MAURO absent. 5. CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING Vice Chair ABBOTT declared the public hearing to be closed. Board of Adjustment Page 5 03/25/99 6. OLD BUSINESS A. Variance at 7110 West 29th Avenue Board Member ECHELMEYER reported that the shed has now been relocated. B. Variance at 38th and Garrison - Board Member THIESSEN asked the status of the trailer at this location. Mr. McCartney explained that the Board of Adjustment had given permission to the homeowner to keep the trailer on his property for six months while he was completing a construction project on his residence. This six month period ended February 27 and when notified that the time period was expired, the homeowner contacted the city to say that he was in the final stage of construction and would soon be applying for a certificate of occupancy. However, code enforcement action has been initiated by the City. C. Garage on West 35th Avenue. Vice Chair ABBOTT reported that the property which involved a request for a variance to allow an addition to store Rolls Royce automobiles has been sold. NEW BUSINESS A. Reorganization of the Board. There was a consensus of the Board to continue the elections for Chairman and Vice Chairman to the April 22nd meeting when there will be more members present. B. Approval of Minutes of February 25, 1999. Board Member HOWARD moved and Board Member ECHELMEYER seconded to approve the minutes of the February 25, 1999 Board of Adjustment meeting. The motion passed by a vote of 4-0 with Board Members BROWN and JUNKER abstaining, and Board Members HOVLAND and MAURO absent. 8. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Board Member HOWARD and seconded by Board Member THIESSEN to adjourn the meeting at 8:50 p.m. The motion passed by a vote of 6-0 with Board Members VLAND and MA O absent. i TOM ABBOTT, Vice Chairman Board of Adjustment ~.r Ann Lazzeri, Secretary Board of Adjustment Board of Adjustment 03/25/99 Page 6 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO: Board of Adjustment DATE OF MEETING: March 25, 1999 DATE PREPARED: March 18, 1999 CASE NO. & NAME: WA-99-08/ Moran Const. CASE MANAGER: Sean McCartney ACTION REQUESTED: Request for a 5' front yard setback variance to the 30' front yard setback requirement. LOCATION OF REQUEST: 10595 West 38"' Place NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT: Tom Moran Construction 3250 Oakland Street, #G Aurora, CO 80010 NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER: Janina Orcholski 10595 West 38" Place Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 APPROXIMATE AREA: 7,800 square feet PRESENT ZONING: Residential-One B PRESENT LAND USE: Single-family residential SURROUNDING ZONING: N:, W: E: Residential-One B; S: Residential-One SURROUNDING LAND USE: N:, W:, S: and E: Single-family residential DATE PUBLISHED: February 5, 1999 DATE POSTED: February 11, 1999 DATED LEGAL NOTICES SENT: February 1, 1999 ENTER INTO RECORD: O COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIAL (X) ZONING ORDINANCE O SLIDES O SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS (X) EXHIBITS (1 OTHER JURISDICTION: The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. I. REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a 5' front yard setback variance to the 30' front yard setback requirement to allow for the construction of a 10' X 16' sunroom. If approved, the sunroom will be constructed around the existing front entrance on the south side and be located approximately 25' from the south property line. J The applicant is the contractor for the project and was informed, during the building permit process, that s the proposed sumoom was encroaching into the 30' front yard setback requirement. Pursuant to Section 1 26-12(F) of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws all structures built within the Residential-One B zone district must retain a 30' front yard setback from the designated front property line. However, if the sunroom e . p' 14, were open on at least two (2) sides the Code of Laws would permit the structure to extend a maximum of 8' into the same designated front yard setback requirement. In this case, the sunroom is not considered q) N ao open and need to comply with the setback requirements established for enclosed structures. It should be noted that there are other residences in the immediate vicinity that have patio covers which legally extend into the established front yard setback. To date, staff has not received any opposition regarding this request. II. SITE PLAN The property in question is rectangular in shape measuring 65' (north and south) X 120' (east and west). Because of the shallow north to south depth and the Code of Laws requirement for a 30' setback for all structures, the property does create a physical hardship. Also, the property is located on the corner of Nelson Street and West 38' Place, thereby the setback requirements would be 30' from Nelson Street (Section 26-12(F)(a)), and 30' from West 38t' Place. III. VARIANCE CRITERIA Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a variance request: 1. Can the property in question yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located? Yes. If the request is denied, the structure may continue to be used as a single-family residence. The purpose of the request is to allow for a sunroom addition that will be built around the entrance of the residence on the south side of the structure. The sunroom addition is purely for convenience. Board of Adjustment WA-99-06/Ragan Page L 2. Is the plight of the owner due to unique circumstances? No. There aren't any unique circumstances attributed with this request. 3. If the variation were granted, would it alter the essential character of the locality? No. Although approval of this variance would allow for the construction of the first enclosed sunroom in the neighborhood, there are other residences in the neighborhood which have covered (but open) patios that legally extend into the established front yard setback. 4. Would the particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved result in a particular hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out? Yes. As previously stated, the property, which is located on the corner of Nelson Street and West 38th Place, was platted with a shallow depth (65') which does not allow for much development opportunity. Typically, corner lots are larger in size. 5. Would the conditions upon which the petition for a variation is based be applicable, generally, to the other property within the same zoning classification? Yes. All applications are reviewed on a case-by-case basis thereby changing the outcome for each request. 6. Is the purpose of the variation based exclusively upon a desire to make money out of the property? No. The purpose of the request is to allow for the entrance of the residence to be enclosed. 7. Has the alleged difficulty or hardship been created by any person presently having an interest in the property? Yes. The applicant, who has interest in the property, has created a self-imposed hardship in that a sunroom is considered more of a luxury than an everyday need. The applicant could construct a patio cover that would be permitted to extend 8' into the 30' front yard setback requirement (if the structure were open on at least 2 sides). 8. Would the granting of the variations be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located? No. Even though approval of this request will allow for the first enclosed structure in the neighborhood to encroach into the front yard setback, there are other properties which have covered patios along West 38' Place. Also, because the proposed structure will remain Board of Adjustment WA-99-06/Ragan Page 3 /3 approximately 25' from the south property line and will be located outside of the established sight-distance-triangle, approval of this request should not be detrimental to the public's welfare. 9. Would the proposed variation impair the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion in the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. No. Because the sunroom is proposed to be located in the designated front yard (25' from the front lot line) and will allow for at least 40' setback from the eastern property line, approval of this request should not impair the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties nor increase the danger of fire. Also, because the structure will be located outside of the designated sight-distance-triangle, approval of this request should not increase congestion in the public streets. 10. If it is found in criteria 8 and 9 above that granting of the variation would not be detrimental or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood, and it is also found that public health and safety, public facilities and surrounding property values would not be diminished or impaired, then would the granting of the variance result in a benefit or contribution to the neighborhood or the community as distinguished from an individual benefit on the part of the applicant, or would granting of the variance result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities? No. This request is solely for the benefit of the homeowner and should not benefit the neighborhood or community. IV. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION Upon review of the above request, and based on the physical layout of the property, staff has found that there may be evidence of a physical hardship attributed to the property in question. However, the fact remains that the request for the sunroom is based purely on Luxor and convenience, and not an every day need. The owner would legally be able to construct an open-sided, covered patio that would be able to encroach 8' into the established front yard setback (22' from front lot line) without the need of a variance. V. RECOMMENDED MOTIONS Option A: "I move that Case No. WA-99-08, a request for a 5' front yard setback variance to the 30' front yard setback requirement for a property zoned Residential-One B and located at 10595 West 38 h Place, be APPROVED for the following reasons: 1. Approval of this request will not be detrimental to the public's welfare. 2. The property is located on the corner of two public right-of-ways and was platted with only a 65' depth. Board of Adjustment WA-99-06/Ragan Page 4 6 Approval of the request will not impair the adequate supply of light and air to the adjacent property to the east." Option B: "I move that Case No. WA-99-08, a request for a T from yard setback variance to the 30' front yard setback requirement for a property zoned Residential-One B and located at 10595 West 38' Place, be DENIED for the following reasons: 1. The request is based on a self-imposed hardship. 2. The owner would be able to construct an open-sided, covered patio that would be able to extend 8' into the designated front yard setback without the need of a variance." E:Vv Xc eykc a fi1es\wa9908.wpd Board of Adjustment WA-99-06/Ragan Page 5 s • W 4= AV9 C` Ex i A- I s WR 3A 15T g 8 g z N 1161 AYE ~ i' J b80 .4098 A-1 b91 bB0 b 3 b8 e94~ tae GIR[ A- I ~9 ~15 4W; 3820 1 1 S -1- W 3BM AVE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WHEAT RIDGE COLORADO MAP ADOPTED: June 15, 1994 Last Revision: February 9, 1999 MPAOM31r OF RA44W, ND PR4L 9ENi - 235-7854 WLN-i'! R-C >'6- 12 p '-•O - o O o o 4151 AVE 4W 4846 b42 ~ - r BLEVINS b s Sp t- U ,002 SUB ygg9 J99 Jy ? n C - 3989 SB)2 A 3089 984 By0 i 3958 3948 ~ 3948 .y9 92 J JgEZ Y I ••J~~/ 3918 39, oe .5-J 5909 3902 J F l 5899 y Bg 2 ( I _ { rt : y~~ . ~ ~t - ~ r J ? ' 386 : ~ ~i ~ I ~ ~ C Ni I O o O ® AREA REQUIRING 517E PLAN APPROVAL 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN L _'1 (APPROXIMATE LOCATION) ZONE P15TIZICT BOUNDRY - PARCEL/LOT BOUNDRY VE51GNATE6 OWNERSHIP) WATER FEATJRE » DENOTES MULTIPLE AD0RE55E5 5E 2 Aaem o » Eo® SCALE 1•.400 6-(-e 5kdll-l a h x-38 rN ~L I V O Ly ~ W 4~ g /J~t' ~VF✓ ~ ~ SCAL: ✓S- 7 021zu: as uo: tip rAA Cdlua 3.00 1). F. 6.20 0 M rY 6 V c 3 °z N Jefferson County , RECORDED IN COUNTY OF JEFFERSON STATE OF COLORADO _ - _ AELCPTION NO. 8705603.1 04/30/87 10:45 9.f0 I'll .-14VU. M....1., I,.. 240 dill, „f ' April t;, fl7.Ix tx,,.II KYLE T. TYCKSEN AND KATHRYN.ANI TYCKSEN _ rmnnp .r Jefferson an-i $tkl' "'if L., nl•,..n n..,.,.-r.tL arol JAN ORCHOLSKI . 10595 Weat 30th Placa ~rWlleat Ridge, Colorado 60033 ' flh•rnm+ly ,•f ' JCf lCrapn nut?Utr•,rf.•Inrmh,. nlthr .er.•ml ty n' n1T?V.n./VT11,Th.r,hr.anl l.y y' orthr (an 1•u1L(... nd ,n n...... rnM Ihr.nm of($62.C00.00) SIXTY TWO THOUSAND AND NO/100------------------------------------ DDLLAe S. i n, it- --d roily nr Ihr flr.t ,.,I m land ".14 LI' the w,d Pvty •.f Ihr wr,•nd pert, thr rrfnpi u'hef rap Ir hrrrl,l' I .••nfr•a-d and a,anu. L•dr•'d. ha, reap NVI, Im,ca,nrti, r„ Id and rnnveyrd. and by there prr •mrdor. Rent. harrain. IL r~•n•ey ...I r•nihrm. At., ;hr ..0 ratty of the n. nil port. III. K0,6 Ad 11 the nl.-A 1•d n.po, r,d a{Ixml. •IV,M,••IIVIIU anA M,nrmthr ' Jefferson) :,ul!,I FtWe„r hd,wnJn, b,•rn.' Lot 6r Black 1. -:':c' '''r, a`A eM1•f;.'°,C .r UNEATRIDGE MOOR THIRD F1 County of Jefrersonr"' - ,+q;v+,'r= State of Colorado. I.nd m,n+b r 10595 West 36th Place, Wheat Ridge, Colorado 60033 TuGF.TIII:N nnh LLI m•I .,neubr tL. nr, ...M nmru+• anti pgnrt trnanr.a Ihrr.,., nrh.neinc. n• m rnywiae •Pp..n I manta. fNl 11,• II - rv,wn amt r,•rrI--,.... in.6 r nn•I rrmitindrre, rrAl.. Inuit and I,,-W. thrreOr. sail all the •rql•. ncnl. nt L•, ea.rInn,and,hn,:pnl xfvp•,.•t.ro(thr said pony ulthr Arm asr6eilhrr in low or eglnty.o(. •n rnd b, the ul..., :.nrrn:nr,l I•am„•., .,th I t.„ hrl.,Ittamrnb and aPPul'tvnanr.•. It, It.\t t. A$n T11.1- 'Lit i Iw ravl p, rl•n r, r :d.n r 1•:r Punrd and d,wrnlwd, with the arrurMnannr, uM.. I hr ..,it pn M of thv v„ r.1 part Ira h"'. Yn.1 a••,rn• A•, rr rr- And Ihr rxW PYrIT „f Ihr m.I Pnt, A.r hm+."r-ho IU,".. ra.rnl,,... p n.1 rdnt.nGl ra:,.n n d,..,.•a •nnnl. of 1,111. 1•hrr,011. anti AFf-r In and with Ihr sold IIAM01h-W-n,IWT. h,• m•,r• and ar•,r„•, thm m the I I I ,1..• en •e:dmr had deli •'eR' Pf Ih„er Pmrt'n:., hr o wrdl srrsrd niche prrmner al•n r , nnv ry rd. a. Pf ......l,.urr, pr, 1„ L a1,.„lute ,,Pd mdrtrPrl6lr r.tatr of In bent a hre. in lax, in fir .i mplr•. and her and nrhT, roll p,.u„r oaJ ),.f.1 lu li... It, In c1':~nl. hPr l'1,, n. ,It end r y thn . .nnn and W'Ah 11 e (orris, ol, and Inez 11, 1. ran. Ar,• fr., iu,d , Irnr !,,,III all Aomt•r .nil ,nhnr cn,m.. Itorrainr. vale. Iirn.. t..r.. o.,••rmr,.,. x,nlrm,,,. m1,+.-.,•(„Irot•. rv au,d er nalnn•.•,nI'nr. EXCEPT general taxes for the current year and subsequent years, cosements. restrictions, reservations, j tuvenants and righta-cf-way of record, if any, and EXCEPT that certain Deed of Trust of record, which the party..of, the_ second part assumes and agrees I CO pay, W. _44V.. . " . ann IAr eL.., rJ Larrnmr,l 1-.,h ,•r. I the ~pnrlmul prx. euld,• pw.rwnm of the r.IJ party a( 0l, •rrnml inn. III, hrtr\ an,) a•9rn• ac0iml all \1,.1 x.'•?!' Ix•I•nP h^n,Tr lac(11111' C!m Pllne 1,r Ix Aaim the whole •t any Part 1 hrTenl, Ihr .md early of Ihr hat purl #111,11 xn,l wdl WARRANT ANTI PbREVER PF.VEND. Thr nhexlar number ehail Inrhnh1 hr nlu rel. I A•• nh,rst t!fr •r1icPLu'. nhd thi• ary of any CrnJ.r shall Lr aPld4•ahle p• ell C.•ndrr.. .IN'WIT.NT$Se'11T.Nflll'•tlu,.unl parll, of In, pr•I Port ht. hragmh•vt h, hand and rest the day and rea r h.1, l alrV T. T e soclL r• Y Y ~lx~m .l 'r lc[ALI Kathryn In Iyc"oil I So:A 1.1 '1_'i STATEM l nLnka all . .rape. ,-f Jeffarsod,~ TL.•pn,.r..tnb W.M1U.....at.0. M.lnnal•nlc.nll, (ate a.. I h+., 24tH daynr April ly 97,Py Kyle T. Tyckaen And Knthryn Ann Tyckacn to ,,.x,..,,,, . I.nn prr r n... r,,.-. ~ddwa. /J FtiJ.~3. .wSCl, u•nne.r my/ a^, al. /it /4 c. 71 ~L✓-s•J -bk a; w Eqr LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION w Ear P ~ P ~ O ti O m Planning and Development Department 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge. CO 80033 oc,,.R,oa Phone(303)235-218;6 ` ccRa~° (Please print or type all information) i 44d 1~ S~ Address 3250 % 0A/L1s}nJI'~> S • Phone -s7Zo /t2b Applicant gyp' O ~r l'` < ~/!"W1n/4- Address ~-L. Owner / Phone City Gr/// ~"r 61 8'0033 Location of request (address) Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request.) ❑ Change of zone or zone conditions 2 Variance / Waiver ❑ Site development plan approval ❑ Nonconforming use change ❑ Special Use Permit ❑ Flood plain special exception ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Interpretation of Code ❑ Temporary Use, Buildings, Signs ❑ Lot line Adjustment ❑ Minor Subdivision (5 lots or less) ❑ Planned Building Group ❑ Subdivision (More than 5 lots) ❑ Street Vacation ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final ❑ Other: Detailed description of the request: AW - S /nltD D' SE~?~A~/L M14/~~cf -I~IhS jI S- Lo Z 0n17_ Fill out the following information to the best of your knowledge. Current Zoning: Size of Lot (acres or square footage): Current use: Proposed use: )mil Assessors Parcel Number: /0- 008, 1 certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge- and that in filing this application, I amacting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above,' without whose consent the requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners must submit power-of-a me from the owner which approved of this action on his behalf. Signature of, pplicants Subscribed nd sworn to me tthis-3 day of& t9 e Notary -.Public My commission expires Date received Receipt No. Case No. Related Case No. Zoning Quarter Section Map J~ /5-l 0 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT on March 25,1999, at 7:30 P.M. at 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. The following petitions shall be heard: 1. Case No. WA-99-06: An application by Ronald Ragan for approval of a 10' side yard variance from the 15' side yard variance requirement for the addition of a bathroom on the east side of the residence. Said property is zoned R-1 and located at 12647 West 38' Drive . 2. ase No. WA-99-08: An application by Tom Moran Construction for a 5' front yard Vvariance from the 30' front yard setback requirement for the addition of a sunroom. Said property is zoned R-IB and located at 10595 West 38' Place. Ay&~ Barbara Delgadillo, Re ' 4ding Secretary ATTEST: Wanda Sang, City Clerk To be Published: Wheat Ridge Transcript Date: March 5, 1999 CABarb= BOATUBRRGS\990325.wpd The City of 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80215 March 4, 1999 Dear Property Owner: Wheat Ridge This is to inform you that Case No. WA-99-08 which is a request for approval to allow a 5' front yard setback variance from the 30' front yard setback requirement for the addition of a sumoom for the property located at 10595 West 38' Place will be heard by the Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue. The meeting will be held on March 25, 1999, at 7:30 p.m. All owners and/or their representative of the parcel under consideration must be present at this hearing. As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to notify any other persons whose presence is desired at this hearing. If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2846. Thank you. Planning Division. C:\Barbara\BOA\PUBHRGS\wa9908cert.wpd (303) 234-5900 • ADMINISTRATION FAX: 234-5924 POLICE DEPARTMENT FAX: 235-2949 D d C N P d d d N ~ •U d a ~ D ~ ~ N C Q ~ d U $ : a C ° ` d c ~ Z ? dl ~ c y U D U d O 01O N = 49 W = N N Fa a 2E8 0. d- L O Z O-D C E LD d " y 'C ap ~ d m o m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 y~ x d a A 0011 Omi m m m OOi d N d°« U N 3 N 3 N 3 N 3 N 3 d 3 N 3 N 3 N 3 u 0 O ° M ° M M M o d M ° c d M.6O a m v°o m w ooo m w OA m 'm moo am " 2°o m am m o yam O m i Oa aa d ` m E „ E V1 o 05 d d m L U OU m m O 85 O (A d m a O N U :E 50 F U m S m O a to U 0 M U y d N U M d O M d 0, N C d N" W 0 C U N M d 0 N d d a Q m v :o c EZa_ mYc a d 3 m,R 2::2 an d o m d i+ N d N a5oa. dn E2 LLm °~mK DO . N N~ mNd x0 V c ~ I-o... c D N d 0~ 00. ? 'c o m.- ' > v m N1 , > d O m d d = N U N N D o m d d L O d L C O d O ~ L > M L d r L an d t O ~ m Q O L O t V N Q C7 > > > > m j to w E m m 2 L U Um oW K F E ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ d Z d LO v W Y Q m ro m m m m ro °rn N cl ~ ` m rn rn w rn rn rn rn rn rn m 00 c ° rn m rn m m rn rn l X W O E m m m m m m rn m m > V z' Wald o N O Q ? a z z F- g Una OA A d F a 0 0. ro b a4 p z H d O 0 .n E z ro F N a r I o~ 1J c r- 01-4 NCO < V) 0 CD CL" F L O O Q U CO o 4~ T x T Z N O m Lki F-• cr M } N ¢ U ~ d ~ Z w co 0 W O F U Il! WN W w x co O Q ~ O } H H x z O w U Z 3 O O C7 Q W C- LA- iu r N r V r W co o Cl N Z OI _ w H T o to ~ Q' co O o J d Q r-i cc a a) a) ¢ .c O U z N W M H x 3 U N CD iD co O r /1 7 N r o C 4 .I a 41 Y to tZ 0 CD r W QU H d N O t F d (7 d! U CCD ~ co OOOC3~ } I41 OW !m to U O r r d N ~ -i O W O +j C: CO Co 0 'C3, CO J•.IOh O CD I-I C) r W m7Co° a z z Q z M Z 2 Q 4 ~ 7 7 ca Y se z COw L O O O O O I fOD cc t. o ~ 17 o tit ao to to rn r r r r N N V V1 N r ~ r r CDr OD 0) C3 M j o O C), C7 m OCD I oto In f O r O , r r O ~ ' O OD Omtl c3 OD z z a F i 2 x }J F- Y Y Q w z z z Y Y 00 S O I I L O Y N S N of r-{ N LL m Y M H H w Y 3 a rn D) 0 a R a Case No.: A9908 ____J App: Last Name: Moran Construction J App: First Name: om Owner: Last Name: Orchoiski Owner: First Name: anina J App Address: 3250 Oakland Street, #G _ City, State Zip: urora CO 80010 App: Phone: 303340-5770 Owner Address: 1059538th Place City/State/Zip: L Owner Phone: 303-423-6040 Project Address: 10595 Street Name: West 38th Place City/State, Zip Quarter Section Map No.: E21 Related Cases: None. -J Case History: Request for a5' front yard ariance for the addition of sunroom. Room will project out 10' with a width Review Body: APN: 2nd Review Body: 2nd Review Date: Decision-making Body: Approval/Denial Date: Reso/Ordinance No. Case Disposition: pproved Project Planner: McCartney File Location: Closed Notes: Follow-Up: ~----..._......._.....-_J Board of Adjustment 312511999 as _-J Conditions of Approval: one. District: lll_ J Date Received: Pre-App Date: J