Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWA-99-137500 West 29th Avenue The City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215 Wheat Telephone 303/ 237-6944 FAX 303/234-5924 June 1, 1999 Mr. Louis Bruno Tall Timbers Construction 27553 Mountain Brook Drive Conifer, CO 80433 RE: WA-99-13 Dear Mr. Bruno: Ridge Please be advised that at its meeting of May 27, 1999, the Board of Adjustment DENIED your request for a 3' lot width variance to the 75' minimum lot width requirement and a 720 square foot lot area variance to the 9000 minimum square foot lot area requirement for the property located at 12425 West 29rh Avenue. Attached is a copy of the Certificate of Resolution stating the Board's decision which became effective the date of the meeting, (May 27, 1999). Should you decide to appeal the decision of the Board, you will need to notify the Jefferson County district court in writing within 30 days of the Board's decision. Please feel free to contact me at (303) 235-2846 if you have any questions. Sincerely, )6444 1~ Barbara Delgadillo Planning and Development Secretary /bd cc: (WA-99-13.) C:\Barbara\BOA\CORRESP\wa9913bmno.wpd CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTION I, Ann Lazzeri, Secretary to the City of Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment, do hereby certify that the following Resolution was duly adopted in the City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado on the 27' day of May, 1999. CASE NO: WA-99-13 APPLICANT: Tall Timbers Construction LOCATION: 12425 West 29`h Avenue Upon a motion by Board Member ABBOTT and second by Board Member ECHELMEYER, the following resolution was stated: WHEREAS, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and WHEREAS, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-99-13 is an appeal to this Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and WHEREAS, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law, and in recognition that there were protests registered against it; and WHEREAS, the relief applied for may not be granted without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA- 99-13 be, and hereby is, denied. TYPE OF VARIANCE: A 3-foot lot width variance to the 75-foot lot width requirement and a 720 square-foot lot area variance to the 9,000 square-foot lot area requirement. FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: If the existing patio on lot 16 is reduced in size, a single family dwelling can legally be constructed on lot 15 without need of a variance. 2. The hardship argued by the applicant is self-imposed and occurred will full knowledge and forethought. 3. Several adjacent neighbors have protested the appeal. 4. There are no apparent variances of this nature within the immediate neighborhood. Board of Adjustment Resolution WA-99-13 VOTE: Yes: ABBOTT, BROWN, ECHELMEYER, HOWARD, HOVLAND and MAURO No: None. Absent: JUNKER and THIESSEN DISPOSITION: A 3' lot width variance to the 75' minimum lot width requirement and a 720 square foot lot area variance to the 9000 minimum square foot lot area requirement to allow construction of a new residence was DENIED. ADOPTED and made effective this 27`h day of May, 1999. BOB HOWARD, Chair Board of Adjustment Ann Lazzeri, Secretary Board of Adjustment ORIGINAL CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Minutes of Meeting May 27,1999 2. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by Chair HOWARD at 7:30 p.m. on May 27, 1999, in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. ROLL CALL Members Present: Tom Abbott Michelle Brown Bill Echelmeyer Bob Howard Paul Hovland Linda Mauro Members Absent: Susan Junker, excused Karen Thiessen, excused Staff Present: Sean McCartney, Planner Ann Lazzeri, Secretary The following is the official set of Board of Adjustment minutes for the Public Hearing of May 27, 1999. A set of these minutes is retained both in the office of the City Clerk and in the Department of Planning and Development of the City of Wheat Ridge. 3. APPROVE THE ORDER OF THE AGENDA It was moved by Board Member HOVLAND and seconded by Board Member ABBOTT that the order of the agenda be approved. The motion passed by a vote of 6-0 with Board Members JUNKER and THIESSEN absent. 4. PUBLIC FORUM (This is the time for anyone to speak on any subject not appearing on the agenda.) There was no one signed up to speak. 5. PUBLIC HEARING A. Case No. WA-99-13: An application by Tall Timbers Construction for approval of a 3-foot lot width variance to the 75-foot minimum lot width requirement and a 720 square-foot lot Board of Adjustment Page 1 05/27/99 area variance to the 9000 square-foot minimum lot area requirement to allow construction of a new residence at 12425 West 29th Avenue. Said property is zoned R-2. This case was presented by Sean McCartney. He reviewed the staff report, presented slides and overheads of the subject property and answered the ten criteria involved in granting a variance. All pertinent documents were entered into the record by Mr. McCartney. He stated that this matter was originally considered as an administrative variance; however, since letters of opposition to this case were received by the city, it is necessary to bring the matter before the Board of Adjustment. Because the only hindrance prohibiting the applicant from legally constructing a single-family dwelling on lot 15 is the presence of the existing patio, and since there is no evidence of hardship or'unique circumstances attributed to the request, the staff recommendation is for denial. Board Member HOVLAND expressed concern that the existing house on lot 16 does not meet current rear setback requirements. Mr. McCartney explained that this is a legal nonconforming situation. In answer to a question from Board Member ABBOTT, Mr. McCartney replied that lots 15 and 16 were never consolidated into one lot Louis Bruno 27553 Mountain Brook Drive, Conifer Mr. Bruno stated that he and Henry Fisk (who was also present) are partners of Tall Timbers Construction and are the present owners of lots 15 and 16. He stated that they purchased the subject property in March of this year and plan to sell lot 15 for the purpose of building a single family dwelling consistent with R-2 zoning. He explained that when the current house was built thirty years ago, it was placed 5" 8" from the rear property line which did not conform to current setback requirements. He stated there would have been no problem if the house had been built to face onto 29th Avenue instead of Ward Court. Although the house could be built on lot 15 without a variance, the setback on lot 16 would become immediately apparent as an error that happened thirty years ago. The 3-foot variance would create a 12-foot setback and would bring lot 16 into conformance with setback requirements. He stated that there is an individual who is interested in building a house on lot 15 that would face 29th Avenue. He commented that the request for variance is an attempt to correct the error created thirty years ago in reconstructing the rear setbacks so that lot 15 could be used for its intended purpose. He did not agree that Tall Timbers Construction created the hardship because the house and patio were there before the property was purchased. He assured the Board that if the variance were to be granted, he would remove the patio and reconstruct a smaller one. He stated that he wanted to bring both lots into conformance with the general character of the neighborhood and that, if a house is built on lot 15 without the variance being approved, lot 16 would become the only house in the neighborhood with an immediately apparent nonconforming setback. Board of Adjustment Page 2 05/27/99 Board Member ECHELMEYER disagreed that an error occurred when the house was originally built. Because the builder owned both lots, she probably planned on using lot 15 as a large back yard. Mr. Bruno stated that lot 15 remained a buildable lot because it was never consolidated into one lot with lot 16. Board Member ECHELMEYER asked for clarification on the selling price of the house and lot 15. Mr. Bruno stated that the house on lot 16 is listed at $195,000, and that the house, including lot 15, is listed at $210,000. He said they were willing to sell the house with lot 15 for the price of $210,000 because they wouldn't have to go to the expense of removing the concrete patio. He also informed the Board that he has received an offer of $27,500 for lot 15. Albert Rich 2960 Wright Street Mr. Rich was sworn in by Chair HOWARD. He stated his opposition to the variance. He expressed concern that a structure on lot 15 would block his view and increase congestion and traffic in the neighborhood. Les Roberts 12485 West 29th Avenue Mr. Roberts was sworn in by Chair HOWARD. He stated his opposition to the variance. He expressed concern about a house being constructed in such a small area. He was also opposed to the removal of trees and other vegetation which would be necessary to accommodate construction of a house on lot 15. Kathi Dunbar 12525 West 29th Avenue Ms. Dunbar was sworn in by Chair HOWARD. She stated her opposition to the variance. She and her husband purchased their home in this area because of the space between houses and they don't want to see houses squeezed together in the neighborhood. Doug Dunbar 12525 West 29th Avenue Mr. Dunbar stated that his concerns had been addressed. Kim Johnson 12515 West 29th Avenue Ms. Johnson was sworn in by Chair HOWARD. She expressed opposition to the variance. She objected to building a house on such a small lot. Board of Adjustment Page 3 05/27/99 Bill Horner 12500 West 29th Avenue Mr. Horner stated that his concerns had already been addressed. Board Member ECHELMEYER stated that he would vote would against the variance because the neighborhood presently has homes with large expanses of yard and also because the developers will not be living in the area. Board Member ABBOTT asked if there were other nonconforming lots in the general area. Mr. McCartney replied that staff found no evidence of nonconformity of lot width or lot area. They found one legally approved variance for a front yard setback. Upon a motion by Board Member ABBOTT and second by Board Member ECHELMEYER, the following resolution was stated: Whereas, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and Whereas, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-99-13 is an appeal to this Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and Whereas, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law, and in recognition that there were protests registered against it; and I Whereas, the relief applied for may not be granted without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge. Now, therefore, be it resolved that Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-99-13 be, and hereby is, denied. Type of Variance: A 3-foot lot width variance to the 75-foot lot width requirement and a 720 square-foot lot area variance to the 9,000 square-foot lot area requirement. For the following reasons: If the existing patio on lot 16 is reduced in size, a single family dwelling can legally be constructed on lot 15 without need of a variance. 2. The hardship argued by the applicant is self-imposed and occurred will full knowledge and forethought. 3. Several adjacent neighbors have protested the appeal. Board of Adjustment Page 4 05/27/99 4. There are no apparent variances of this nature within the immediate neighborhood. The motion for denial passed by a vote of 6-0 with Board Member JUNKER and THIESSEN absent. Chair HOWARD advised the applicant that the request for variance was denied. B. Case No. WA-99-14: An application by Sandra Thompson for approval of a 5.47% variance from the 25% maximum lot coverage requirement thereby increasing lot coverage to 30.47% in order to construct a home meeting the handicapped space requirements. The property is located at 3231 Oak Street and zoned R-1 and is owned by Jim and Kathryne Gault. The case was presented by Sean McCartney. He distributed copies of information to members of the Board concerning the owner's medical disabilities and VA requirements for house construction. He reviewed the staff report, presented slides and overhead projections of the subject property; and answered the ten criteria used in considering a variance. All pertinent documents were entered into the record. Mr. McCartney explained that the applicant did receive an administrative variance to allow for a 3,474 square-foot lot coverage. The difference between the administrative variance and the proposed request is 368 feet which could be addressed with minor changes to the proposed floor plan and, therefore, staff recommended denial of the request. Sandra Thompson 3319 Raleigh Street, Denver Ms. Thompson, architect for Mr. and Mrs. Gault, was sworn in by Chair HOWARD. She stated that the house was designed to meet the needs of Mr. Gault, who is handicapped. She reviewed the floor plan for the proposed dwelling. The floor plan meets the requirements for VA assistance such as wider hallways, larger bathrooms and handicapped access to the home. She explained that when she originally submitted the plans and requested an administrative variance, there was an error in the actual lot coverage. The lot has since been surveyed to determine the correct lot coverage. She noted that there are other houses in the neighborhood that have received variances for physical disability accommodation. Board Member ABBOTT asked if there would be significant reduction in the square footage of the house if the plans included normal sized hallways, bathrooms, etc. Ms. Thompson replied that there would be no need for a variance in that case because there would be approximately 35% less space in terms of circulation. She noted that the 2-1/2 car garage also reduces the lot coverage. Board of Adjustment Page 5 05/27/99 PUBLIC HEARING SPEAKERS' LIST CASE NO: WA 99-13 Tall Tim REQUEST bers Construction - 12425 West 29 DATE: May 27,1999 th Avenue Speaker Name (PLEASE PRINT) Address/Phone In Favor / Opposed AJh~r~f~,~l 2g60 kJ~ it 40 0o, (mss I~~Bs w. Av-L ©PPUS~A ) nose ~i gorn e r J~soy U7 ~!r ~dse~ CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO: Board of Adjustment DATE OF MEETING: May 27, 1999 DATE PREPARED: May 20, 1999 CASE NO. & NAME WA-99-13/ Tall Timbers Construction CASE MANAGER: Sean McCartney ACTION REQUESTED: Request for a 3' lot width variance to the 75' lot width requirement and a 720 square foot lot area variance to the 9,000 square foot lot area requirement. LOCATION OF REQUEST: NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER: APPROXIMATE AREA: PRESENT ZONING: PRESENT LAND USE: SURROUNDING ZONING: SURROUNDING LAND USE: 12425 West 20 Avenue Tall Timbers Construction 27553 Mountain Brook Drive Conifer, CO 80433 Same 9,085 square feet Residential-Two Vacant lot N:, W:, and E: Residential-Two, and S: Lakewood N:, W:, and E: Single-family, and S: Park DATE PUBLISHED: DATE POSTED: DATED LEGAL NOTICES SENT: May 7, 1999 May 12, 1999 May 5, 1999 ENTER INTO RECORD: O COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (X) ZONING ORDINANCE O SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OTHER The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been met, therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIAL O SLIDES (X) EXHIBITS 4-I L REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a Y lot width variance to the 75' lot width requirement and a 720 square foot lot area variance to the 9,000 square foot lot area requirement to allow for the construction of a single-family residence. This request was originally requested as an administrative variance to allow for the same request. At the time of referral, staff received several letters of opposition from the adjacent property owners. Most of the letters were in opposition of any development being permitted on this property and that any construction would ruin views and create too much density. Therefore, the administrative variance was denied and referred to the Board of Adjustment. Currently, Lot 15 measures 79' by 115' and Lot 16 measures 85' by 115'. Because these are separate parcels and they both comply with the minimum lot width and lot area requirements established for a single-family dwelling in the Residential-Two zone district, a request to construct a single-family residence on Lot 15 would be considered an administrative action. However, the existing residential structure, which is located on Lot 16, has a patio that extends 7' over the adjoining lot line to the west. Staff informed the applicant that if the patio were removed, he would be able to construct a single-family dwelling on Lot 15 without the need of a variance. The applicant stated that he would rather keep the existing patio and allow for a larger backyard for the existing house. Also, the applicant will need to submit an application for a Lot Line Adjustment, and record a Plat map with the Jefferson County Clerk and Recorders office. It should be noted, however, that if the variance request and lot line adjustment are approved, the existing patio will be located on the adjusted property line. Therefore, approval of this request will create a nonconforming setback for the existing patio. Pursuant to Section 26-15(F) of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, a single-family dwelling constructed in the Residential-Two zone district requires a minimum lot area of 9,000 square feet and a minimum lot width of 75'. II. SITE PLAN The property in question is located in the Maple Grove Village Subdivision on the northwest corner of West 29`h Avenue and Ward Court. It is located in a single-family residential neighborhood and has the Maple Grave Park across the street, to the south. Currently, Lot 15 could be legally built on, allowing for a single-family dwelling, as permitted by the development standards established in the Residential-Two zone district. However, because the existing patio, on Lot 16, extends over the. adjoining property line to the west and the existing residential dwelling only allows for a T backyard, the applicant is requesting the variance. III. VARIANCE CRITERIA Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a variance request: Board of Adjustment WA-99-13/Tall Timbers Construction Page 2 4_~L_ 1. Can the property in question yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located? Yes. If the request is denied, the applicant could remove the existing patio on Lot 16 and legally construct a single-family dwelling on Lot 15. 2. Is the plight of the owner due to unique circumstances? No. There aren't any unique circumstances attributed with this request. 3. If the variation were granted, would it alter the essential character of the locality? Yes. This would be the only property in the immediate vicinity that would have a lot width less than 75'. However, it should be noted that the difference will only be T, which isn't considered a major visual hinderance. 4. Would the particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved result in a particular hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out? No. The property is relatively flat and square in shape and currently complies with the minimum lot width and lot area required for a single-family dwelling in the Residential-Two zone district. 5. Would the conditions upon which the petition for a variation is based be applicable, generally, to the other property within the same zoning classification? Yes. All applications are reviewed on a case-by-case basis thereby changing the outcome for each request. 6. Is the purpose of the variation based exclusively upon a desire to make money out of the property? No. The purpose of the request is to allow for an existing patio to remain and to enlarge the backyard of the existing dwelling on Lot 16. Has the alleged difficulty or hardship been created by any person presently having an interest in the property? Yes. The hardship has been created by the owner, who has interest in the property. 8. Would the granting of the variations be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located? Board of Adjustment Page 3 WA-99-13/Tall Timbers Construction No. Because the request is to vary the lot width and lot area, approval of this request should not be detrimental to the public's welfare nor injurious to other property improvements in the neighborhood. 9. Would the proposed variation impair the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion in the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. No. As previously stated, the request is to vary the lot width and lot area, therefore the proposed structure will comply with the required setbacks. Because of this, approval of this request should not impair the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties nor increase the danger of fire. 10. If it is found in criteria 8 and 9 above that granting of the variation would not be detrimental or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood, and it is also found that public health and safety, public facilities and surrounding property values would not be diminished or impaired, then would the granting of the variance result in a benefit or contribution to the neighborhood or the community as distinguished from an individual benefit on the part of the applicant, or would granting of the variance result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities? No. Approval of this request is purely for individual benefit. IV. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION Upon review of the above request, staff concludes that the only hindrance prohibiting the applicant from legally constructing a single-family dwelling on Lot 15 is the presence of the existing patio. Staff has found that there isn't any hardship or unique circumstances attributed to this request that would warrant approval of a variance. Therefore, staff recommends DENIAL. V. RECOMMENDED MOTIONS Option A: "I move that Case No. WA-99-13, a request of a 3' lot width variance to the 75' lot width requirement and a 720 square foot lot area variance to the 9,000 square foot lot area requirement for a property zoned Residential-Two and located at 12425 West 29`h Avenue, be DENIED for the following reasons: 1. If the.existing patio on Lot 16 is removed, a single-family dwelling can legally be constructed on Lot 15 without the need of a variance. 2. There is no hardship demonstrated." Option B: "I move that Case No. WA-99-13, a request of a 3' lot width variance to the 75' lot width requirement and a 720 square foot lot area variance to the 9,000 square foot lot area requirement for a Board of Adjustment WA-99-13/Tall Timbers Construction Page 4 01 property zoned Residential-Two and located at 12425 West 29`s Avenue, be APPROVED for the following reasons: 1. Approval of this request will not be detrimental to the public's welfare. 2. Approval of this request should not impair the adequate supply of light and air to the adjacent properties." Board of Adjustment WA-99-13/Tall Timbers Construction Page 5 U d_ ~ N f F ' u t 1 UNINCORPORATED .E;PPERS(:N COUNTY gam Ave n Q ~ r J ~ 3 4 J ^n A - R4 R-G LAKEWOOD Maps Grove Park ii--~------ -MAFLE_ GROVE AVE ii! RES. ii-- OFFICIAL ZONI NG MAP NHEAT RI DGE COLORADO MAP ADOPTED: Mie 15, 1994 Las} PAYWm:.lonuary 9,1995 ZONE DISTRICT 5OUNDRY PARCEL/LOT BOUNDRY (DESIGNATES OWNERSHIP) -==CITY LIMIT LINE - WATER FEATURE • DENOTES MULTIPLE ADDRESSES I SIX 21:~ n saw SCALE 1'=400 DWAV,Mr OF PIAW116 AW MW - Z5-=2 1'v U. L ar. s A ° A ~ P o WAizt;p couftr" ..0 r- 1 O c W li i ~ a a ~ y5f G i M o 2 z -J N ~ ~l r fJ m ~o TALL TIMBERS CONSTRUCTION, LLP 27553 MOUNTAIN BROOK DR CONIFER, COLO. 80433 PHONE/FAX 303-816-0378 April 22, 1999 City of Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustmernt Planning & Development Dept. 7500 W. 29th Ave Wheat Ridge, Co 80033 Re: Variance Dear Members of theBoard Attached to this letter you will find the application of Tall Timbers Construction, LLP to obtain a minor variance pursuant to the Wheat Ridge City Code section 26-6 for the following described property: Lot 15 Block 4, Maple Grove Village-Blocks 2 through 10 County of Jefferson, State of Colorado also known as 2915 Ward Court/12425 W. 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge Colorado 80033. The specific nature of the request for the variance is to reduce the minimum lot width by three feet (from 75 feet to 72 feet) and a finrther variance in the minimum lot area square footage by720 sq ft (9000 sq ft - 720 sq ft= 8280) on the above described property but retaining this lot as a buildable lot. A review of your records and the plat of this subdivision will disclose that Lot 15 is a separate buildable lot which has never been developed. Lot 16 has been developed but the rear of the single family residence located thereon is five (5)feet from the common lot line between the two. The proposed variance would bring the rear set back of lot 16 to twelve(12) feet which we understand from your current restrictions will bring Lot 16 into compliance with the R-2 minimum rear set back restrictions. Such a variance would also eliminate the encroachment now existing whereby the concrete patio at the rear of the Lot 16 residence en- croaches onto Lot 15 by seven (7) feet. ( See attached Improvement Location Certificate). Phone: 1-303-816-0378 Fax: 1-303316-0378 THELBRUNOS@JUNO.COM 'q- g Page 2. Please advise if this request for variance can be approved since the development of Lot 15 until the encroachment and the rear set back of lot 16 are brought into compliance. Thank you for your consideration and attention to this matter. Very uis, rUll0 Partner ( /I~ 5 W co < N ~ U U ca N ~Lz ~ i D s I ~ m v ~ a~~o d N v I y o c^q y .J v ~ ~ w ~ v I O T y d J a N G A d^^ c e ei. i 'W ;i Z I to w m m ° m c o ~ rn." c• ~ v ~ . p . ~ c 76 "A o • m a I q v o = ' e m o W ,o w T m i Z UU oq 2. I " w G U P v o d eP " •O w 9 Q x i v m m _ c c 3 v°-y w° y°. ° O1 N W I 1 ~ UI bl d •y ~ d d y~ G m~ O m w ,y W ~Ci I 1 m W W R1 N u"' G G A x T ~ G N ° S3$A O -N o 0 I G w~ " 4 w v° C v `rJ r y `a,' v rpi. ro ~C m O 16 W I O y v T° N y ti p ti w' > G a 2 O U O E 1 m - w N m C ° ro an d ° n m 3 x ri - ri w I o0 m O 1"i .Gy. w m G m K eP m Sa A U > U i = yr .-I `d v" a y g G v i+ q v? o w W d a q o c v a 0 b d 3 eWn ° o Do d y h 44 5 vi ° i° H q m ~•A U a 0 O 'o ° 1 3 o v v W •o Ei ~frI'i U 0 1 U O n N U d oP O N y ~O ° W Y 4 V O O c }Ci -.Ci c i c N O 3 m o w ro A^ -o c o W ° Ww C G ro I a L F U UI .~-I w a O n v W d> z ti N co c o w rn d„ m .o c o 3 0> w Q c, o cr . •--1 N N N C N C U O C w° I ° m W W w 'c' m y n, '^~a y F m' c 3 7-I O }i' O w I 1 L m m N> N L 4 z m u ° ri m m m o l I X I a c 'row d d o g 3 Q m v on ,0 -a xa !v H 7-I M 3-I ° 0 o v w° uNi w en o i w> bl o " > c Ga c v y rt W rt o M q w t~ w v .--i 1 ° o W (z m O O U) h N r] O I G y r-1 N y W? xi N N o U G) R4 ~ E Z I y m ,-I w a s a 0 w y h m m v~ .o s U rd O Wa' ro 16 O rl O q I w G, Ul w Cu `r^S „ F ti a x W a 77 O x 16 `v 5•i Z I y 'm o `O N h O FC „ Q 2 m'^ C z r G.^ w U w E y y Q `~3 9 ••o. fC O w La-a C m 3° A y 'c v~ W •m ° ` A N C C v] W" rn C4 O c !Z G W GL C X 7 m Z In U' 7+ 3 [xi mom, qm cJ m,, a3, 'm u o v Z rt O" m N p ya U c U z U) m c v v U w ° W v ~y Q s o n. v = m c° W P d y p $ m Cyi D v °O o q N ri C .k O v `r" U° E o C n m° w+ F j w° U c 3 o O ° O. 7 o O" .~a d O "3 T v c v Q v v „'a^ iO x v o GL v O N O v m y F m m' c c y rd O b F o w 3 o E -o i-7 £ U a u= m rte.. m v c F' F M vi U P+ P P 3 l aF WHEgr LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION °E WHEAT P P h p ti p ° Planning and Development Department 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Phone(303)235-2846 °o[oRno° (Please print or type alt informati)n) 71 Applicant/61144 /ees //INS//~NC7 a^t~ddress o?7553 f91~u-61-A/ t Phone 3D ~f/6-a37 City ~Nf Fee eo </33 Owner SA'VA Address S,4Ac9- Phone S?J&'e- City / Location of request (address) W. A7 4ue- m147,-Ur Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions li ste d below which pertain to your request.) ❑ Change of zone or zone conditions K Variance / Waiver ❑ Site development plan approval Nonconforming use change ❑ Special Use Permit ❑ Flood plain special exception ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Interpretation of Code ❑ Temporary Use, Buildings, Signs ❑ Lot line Adjustment ❑ Minor Subdivision (5 lots or less) ❑ Planned Building Group ❑ Subdivision (More than 5 lots) ❑ Street Vacation ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final ❑ Other: Detailed description of the request: /'d eve of A M VAel'Wee- I e r ~i! 71t ve "'WIP Al e R634 76- gd / "P44 Q P~,- S 5 W d3 PN~ Fill out the following information to the best of your knowledge. Current Zoning: 7-~L Size of Lot (acres or square footage)- Current use: n~ 1,44 Current Proposed use: Si Tv '41n( / - 2 Assessors Parcel Num er: 3"2 I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above, without whose consent the re action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners must submit power-of-a me m the o r w proved of this action on his behalf. Signature of Appl Subscribed and sworn to me this 0 day of , 19 Notary blic My commission expire!/2]2 Date received Receipt No. Case No. L' Related Case No. ~~1R~ I~ Zoning Quarter Section Ma~ e4- 11' NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT on May 27,1999, at 7:30 p.m. at 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. The following petitions shall be heard: Case No. WA-99-13: An application by Tall Timbers Construction for approval of a three (3) foot lot width variance to the 75 foot minimum lot width requirement and a 720 square foot lot area variance to the 9000 square foot minimum lot area requirement to allow construction of a new residence at 12425 West 29" Avenue. Said property is zoned R-2. 2. Case No. WA-99-14: An application by Sandra Thompson for approval of a 5.47% variance from the 25% maximum lot coverage requirement thereby increasing lot coverage to 30.47% in order to construct a home meeting the handicapped space requirements. Property is located at 3231 Oak Street and zoned R-1. 3. Case No. TUP-99-03: An application by Sandra Thompson for approval of a temporary use permit to allow recreational vehicle sales on a land with C-1 zoning: Restricted Use: RV's and boat storage only. Said property is located at 11868 West 4411 Avenue. Barbara Delgadillo, R ording Secretary ATTEST: Wanda Sang Catty Clerk To be Published: Wheat Ridge Transcript Date: May 7, 1999 C:\B.bua\BOA\PU13HRGS\990527.wpd PO BOX 638 TELEPHONE: 303/237-6944 The City of 7500 WCST 29TH AVENUE . WHEAT RIDGE. COLORADO 00034 ~7Vheat GRidge POSTING CERTIFICATION CASE NO. WA-J7-13 PLANNING COMMISSION - CITY COUNCIL - BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (Circle One) HEARING DATE: ( n a m e residing at ,j 573 /17o,141ikle 4601C (Q,&:Fc/ l6 ( a d d r e s ) as the applicant for Case No. W,4 - -yl - /~3 hereby certify that I have posted the Notice of Public Hearing at it s ~1.~ A 1~G1~7~7 o c a t 1 o' n on this day of N 190,-, and do hereby certify that said sign has been posted and remained in place for fifteen (15) days prior to and including the scheduled day of public hearing of this case. The sign was posted in the position shown on the map below. S NOTE: This form must be submitted at the public hearing on this case and will be placed in the applicant's case file at the Department of Community Development. M A P 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE May 5, 1999 Dear Property Owner: WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80215 The City of ~~pF W HEAT Wheat a ,m GRidge cN O R NID This is to inform you that Case No. WA-99-13 which is a request for a 3' lot width variance to the 75' minimum lot width requirement and a 720 square foot lot area variance to the 9000 minimum square foot lot area requirement for the property located at 12425 West 29th Avenue will be heard by the Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue. The meeting will be held on May 27, 1999, at 7:30 p.m. All owners and/or their representative of the parcel under consideration must be present at this hearing. As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to notify any other persons whose presence is desired at this hearing. If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2846. Thank you. Planning Division. C:\Barbara\BOA\PUB HRGS\wa9913letter.wpd (303) 234-5900 • ADMINISTRATION FAX: 234-5924 • POLICE DEPARTMENT FAX: 235-2949 D d `I C w W d ~ A! a C d y N C ` U ~ 9 ~ d N a 7 C - Q r m a ~ O N N ` ~ C 7 ~ ' D a d I K ' > R a N ~ 1~ N y N ~Ea a 0 y r U L O N E a C E 1 .0 YO = # M M M M M M M M _ N NDO= L N m a7 W m 'm 0 % U R d y R U m R O) R m R 01 d W R A R m N 0) d ¢ R 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 u 0 O 16 o a d ` C ~O L 10 ~O ~O ~O ~O o 0 l) l[l 'a W d N j N J N N OI N C d O a W O a O N O V m N- O d W d t j N c U d U N = t C N O OM y d ` N O8O d L 0 O DO -0 O p.L.O OOO J m d.:5 .O m GNU ~O1U E. RU U E R NNU 0N0 GIU CO o m N 9 ~~a o~ V > >'C > a>"O a -'`y"O vl `l CU d C a d d i, d ¢ ~O O C7 0 O 1i O) ~i ~ M O d N N M O N N E o 0 O E i0 J . p 00 E O O y y R a_ N d W V N J N Y d N Y L Y L U Y d - Y Y to Y H M O U R N Y cG ldl Nd D N J d Q J R J J J J _ N J d L C y N W U N a Q O ~ N Q 4= C N N 0 O w 0 w` 0X ° ~U c~ d E w R ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ z d L u r Y Q N o ` ` ° ro m m ` ° m Q co o m a o a n °r ~ n n n n n W E m rn m m m m rn m U Z Q W O W xFO N O z Z 0 a o W z LO 3 Ut~~ a ~I N ~O+ F: W O~q U ~i O R z m a' ^ U FO b T p 0 p z H a Q rn ~ m o w a ~ m o O m N n U U Q O O Z C O O- a) T 0 m cu '6 C m ' y Q o a) C C o m 9 9 o m m m °Q u, c m o m , 0 O N o u U N N of a O ` O O a) o O m J > > -O -O o_ fl. N N C O N N N Q Q U U CL LL C O Lo p ~O . O - p ~m N O O = N O co c U N ~ U O > m NN 0 -rom c CO M C) > m o U i p O L N 3 C m M Cl) j 0 C N 0 E O O O C O co U 0 U fu CO > cc E Q a'c o o s o m> E r O M c° I c m LO m N m~m~ a) j m Q - E o 9 m E v d CA Q d 3 m m > > I- (D fn r- N U co U) r O O m O Z CL E E a) a) c z Z is N ui 2 N c ai F4 w Z` o FL m 'a a ¢ w o a ¢ E z Y m U) m L) o v m J ii ` ` Q m a d ` d a) ) a ) a m a ) (D r 0 0 0 0 ` 0 Q ¢ ¢ U ¢ 0 a U) CU a w U