HomeMy WebLinkAboutWA-99-227500 West 29th Avenue The City of
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215 Wheat
FAX 303/235-2857
November 4, 1999
Mr. Robert Alldredge
2890 Lamar
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
RE: WA-99-22
Dear Mr. Alldredge:
Ridge
Please be advised that at its meeting of October 28, 1999, the Board of Adjustment approved your
request for approval of a 17' side yard variance from the 30' side yard setback requirement for
property zoned R-1 and located at 2890 Lamar Street with conditions.
Attached is a copy of the Certificate of. Resolution stating the Board's decision which became
effective the date of the meeting, October 28, 1999. Should you decide to appeal the decision of the
Board, you will need to notify the Jefferson County district court in writing within 30 days of the
Board's decision
Please feel free to contact me at (303) 235-2846 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Barbara Delgadillo
Senior Secretary
/bd
Attachment: Certificate of Resolution
cc: WA-99-22
C:\Bubm\BOA\CORRESAwa9922N2.wpd
CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTION
I, Ann Lazzeri, Secretary to the City of Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment, do hereby
certify that the following Resolution was duly adopted in the City of Wheat Ridge,
County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, on the 28th day of October, 1999.
CASE NO. WA-99-22
APPLICANT NAME: Robert Alldredge
LOCATION: 2890 Lamar Street
Upon a motion by Board Member ABBOTT and second by Board Member BROWN, the
following resolution was stated:
WHEREAS, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and
WHEREAS, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-99-22 is an appeal to this
Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and
WHEREAS, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law, and in
recognition that there were no protests registered against it; and
WHEREAS, the relief applied for may be granted without substantially impairing the
intent and purpose of the regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Board of Adjustment Application Case
No. WA-99-22 be, and hereby is, approved.
TYPE OF VARIANCE: A 17-foot side yard variance from the 30-foot side yard
setback requirement for the purpose of constructing a detached garage.
FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
There are unique circumstances:
a) Shifting the structure south would create an impractical driveway
entrance.
b) The applicant will be replacing two existing nonconforming structures.
2. There will be visual buffering, including vegetation and a grade change for the
properties most impacted.
3. There will no negative effect on the public safety and welfare.
Board of Adjustment
Resolution No. 99-22
Page two (2)
4. Placement elsewhere on the property will require removal of existing mature
trees.
5. This variance should create a benefit to the neighborhood.
6. A letter of support was given by the neighbor across the street on Lamar.
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
The roof structure will include dormers which will match the house and face west
as was presented to the Board.
2. All portions of the existing shed and carport will be removed.
This variance does not set a precedent for expansion of further structures.
VOTE: YES: ABBOTT, BROWN, HOWARD,
HOVLAND, JUNKER, MAURO
ABSENT: ECHELMEYER, THIESSEN
DISPOSITION: A 17-foot side yard variance from the 30-foot side yard setback
requirement for the purpose of constructing a detached garage was granted.
ADOPTED and made effective this 28th day of October, 1999.
BOB HOWARD, CHAIR Ann Lazzeri, Secretary
Board of Adjustment Board of Adjustment
5. PUBLIC HEARING
A. Case No. WA-99-22: An application submitted by Robert Alldredge for approval of a
17-foot side yard variance from the 30-foot side yard setback requirement for property
zoned Residential-One and located at 2890 Lamar Street.
This case was presented by Meredith Reckert. She reviewed the staff report, presented
slides and overheads of the subject property and answered the ten criteria involved in
granting a variance. All pertinent documents were entered into the record. She advised
that all notification and posting requirements had been met and the Board had jurisdiction
to hear the case. Staff recommended approval for reasons outlined in the staff report.
Robert Alldredge
2890 Lamar
Mr. Alldredge was sworn in by Chair HOWARD. He read the following letter into the
record. This letter, dated 9-23-99, was written by Edward Lightner, 2895 Lamar (the
neighbor directly across the street) "Dear Members of the Planning Division: In regard
to Case No. WA-99-22 which is a request for approval of a 15-foot side yard variance
from the 30 foot side yard setback requirement for property located at 2890 Lamar
Street. The writer of this letter owns 2895 Lamar, the property directly west of the above
mentioned property, and also 2801 Lamar, the property southwest of the 2890 Alldredge
property. My wife, Lani, and 1 have no objections to the proposed variance. The
Alldredge's property is well maintained and we feel confident that any addition will
reflect good architectural taste. In conclusion, the variance will provide for easy access
to the garage, and we understand the desire for this variance. " Mr. Alldredge explained
that Mr. Lightner's reference to a 15-foot variance was due to an error made in the
original publication of the request which has necessitated reposting and republication for
the hearing tonight. Mr. Lightner indicated he has no opposition to the additional two
feet.
Mr. Alldredge stated that when he purchased the property, there were two nonconforming
structures on the property which he plans to remove if the variance is approved.
Board Member ABBOTT asked the applicant if he had contacted the church next door
regarding his application. Mr. Alldredge replied that he did not personally contact them;
however, the property has been posted and the church has not responded.
In response to a question from Chair HOWARD, Mr. Alldredge stated that he is not sure
what the height of the garage will be; however, it will be a standard height and the roof
line will be the same pitch as the house.
(Board Member HOVLAND arrived at 7:50 p.m.)
Board of Adjustment Page 2
10/28/99
Chair HOWARD asked the size of the garage. Mr. Alldredge replied that it will be 624
square feet.
It was the consensus of the Board that Board Member HOVLAND should abstain from
voting on this matter because he was not present for the entire presentation.
Board Member MAURO commented that removal of the two existing nonconforming
structures and replacing them with a garage will be an aesthetic improvement. The
garage will be also be less noticeable due to the drop in grade.
Meredith Reckert stated that staff has received no negative comments regarding this
application.
Upon a motion by Board Member ABBOTT and second by Board Member BROWN, the
following resolution was stated:
Whereas, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and
Whereas, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-99-22 is an appeal to this
Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and
Whereas, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law, and in
recognition that there were no protests registered against it; and
Whereas, the relief applied for may be granted without substantially impairing the intent
and purpose of the regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge.
Now, therefore, be it resolved that Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-99-
22 be, and hereby is, approved.
Type of Variance: A 17-foot side yard variance from the 30-foot side yard setback
requirement.
For the following reasons:
1. There are unique circumstances:
a) Shifting the structure south would create an impractical driveway
entrance.
b) The applicant will be replacing two existing nonconforming structures.
2. There will be visual buffering, including vegetation and a grade change for the
properties most impacted.
Board of Adjustment Page 3
10/28/99
There will no negative effect on the public safety and welfare.
Placement elsewhere on the property will require removal of existing mature
trees.
5. This variance should create a benefit to the neighborhood.
6. A letter of support was given by the neighbor across the street on Lamar.
With the following conditions:
The roof structure will include dormers which will match the house and face west
as was presented to the Board.
2. All portions of the existing shed and carport will be removed.
3. This variance does not set a precedent for expansion of further structures.
The motion passed by a vote of 5-0 with Board Member HOVLAND abstaining, and
Board Members THIESSEN and ECHELMEYER absent.
Chair HOWARD informed the applicant that his request for variance had been granted.
B. Case No. WA-99-24: An application submitted by Stanley Dyck for approval of a 192
square-foot maximum detached garage variance from the 600 square-foot maximum
detached garage requirement for the purpose of building a 792 square-foot garage for
property zoned Residential-One C and located at 3159 Depew Street.
This case was presented by Meredith Reckert. She reviewed the staff report, presented
slides and overheads of the subject property and answered the ten criteria involved in
granting a variance. All pertinent documents were entered into the record. She advised
that all notification and posting requirements had been met and the Board had jurisdiction
to hear the case. Staff recommended approval for reasons outlined in the staff report.
Board Member MAURO commented that the sign was difficult to see from the street.
Stanley Dyck
3159 Depew Street
Mr. Dyck was sworn in by Chair HOWARD. He stated that the garage is planned to be
architecturally consistent with the house and that the existing shed will be removed.
None of the neighbors has expressed opposition to the application for variance.
Board of Adjustment Page 4
10/28/99
PUBLIC HEARING SPEAKERS' LIST
CASE NO: GU A - 9~ --Zp
DATE: October 28, 1999
REQUEST
c -S
Speaker Name
(PLEASE PRINT)
Address/Phone In Favor / Opposed
7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80215
October 4, 1999
Dear Property Owner:
The City of WHEAT~o
%Vheat ,m
Ridge
C'OZORA~O
This is to inform you that Case No. WA-99-22 which is a request for approval of a 17 foot side
yard variance from the 30 foot side yard setback requirement for property located at 2890 Lamar
St. will be heard by the Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment in the Council Chambers of the
Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue. The meeting will be held on October 28, 1999,
at 7:30 p.m.
All owners and/or their representative of the parcel under consideration must be present at this
hearing. As an area resident or interested parry, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing
and/or submit written comments. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to notify any other
persons whose presence is desired at this hearing.
If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at
235-2846. Thank you.
Planning Division.
C:\Barbara\BOA\PUBHRGS\wa9922urt.wpd
(303) 234-5900 • ADMINISTRATION FAX: 234-5924 • POLICE DEPARTMENT FAX: 235-2949
a
m I
c
m
W W
c
a
c
w
y
y
'u
y
~
d
a
7
9
u
~
i
a
tr
a
m
d
~
.p
c
7
'd
a
u
y
O
I
u
K
[L
'
>
`o W
y
O
y
O
D
:
y
m .Q
0
`
a0
y U
16 '@
@
c
E 0.0
.y.
y t' 9-
#
y
N
N
N
N
N
N
- N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
x
~ m a
m
m
rn
c
y
U
m
rn
rn
m
m
3
3
3
3
3
3
-3
U_
0
O
O
y
L
IL
a
a
F v
e
v
U v
C
N
d 0
N
. O
y N
.
y 0
N
O
N
N O
N
N O
u j N
C
O
0
O
A
O~ > aD
W
C > eD
N CO
t N
M..: W
C
O y W
`
N
E L 0
O
MO
0 85 0
0
L
~ m 0
P
0
74> 0
oO~
O
~c
Eo'U
o
REV
a~EU
.
-OEV
mLU
`N
y
9
N
C C
U Y O
W N m
'O J O
Z J p
Q J m
C N p
(V
N
Q
I
N~.~
f
'"~Oa
N~~
I
yN9
1
LT
Oi
N09
~
O 'O
i/
n
y
-MCC
l0 O
C N
3 O)
.
.
V
L rn~
0~( C
M
u a) C
D N
"M
Y mm
W N y
%
0" N
a' N N
m
N
m
~
t
cm m
v
0 y
y
a_M y
C "
' N d K v
N :F C N y
m
p
N
r
N w o
iw
E
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑
z
y
{O
O
W
N
Q
N
M
M
M
m
M
M
o
e
v
m
v
m
v
m
v
a
m
Q 00
m
m
m
rn
m
m
W 0
E
m
Z
¢¢w z
x
F-o
LL N p
z
ova "
O.
o W z
a ) g
v
U n ~ a
~
V A
m
C
a
m
U
N
Qr
W
0
CN
i+
z
N
R O
(ti Q
v
a
a
a
P
z
79
H
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING j
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT on October 28,1999, at 7:30 p.m. at 7500 West 29th Avenue,
Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or
submit written comments. The following petitions shall be heard:
1. Case No. WA-99-22: An application submitted by Robert Alldredge for approval of a 17'
side yard variance from the 30 foot side yard setback requirement for property zoned R-1
and located at 2890 Lamar St.
2. Case No. WA-99-24: An application submitted by Stanley Dyck for approval of a 192
sq. ft. maximum detached garage variance from the 600 sq. ft. maximum detached garage
requirement for the purpose of building a 792 square foot garage for property zoned R-1C
and located at 3159 Depew Street.
3. Case No. WA-99-25: An application submitted by Derek Drummond for a 10' side yard
setback from the 15' side yard setback requirement for the purpose of building a 2-car
garage for property zoned A-I and located at 4440 Independence.
~lQti (snxi a 1»
Barbara Delgadillo, Recc • ing Secretary
ATTEST:
Wanda Sang, City Clerk
To be Published: Wheat Ridge Transcript
Date: October 8, 1999
C:\Barbm\BOA\PUBHRGS\991028pub.wpd
- " The City Of
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215 Wheat
FAX 303/235-2857 Ridge
September 28, 1999
Mr. Robert Alldredge
2890 Lamar
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
RE: WA-99-22
Dear Mr. Alldredge:
Please be advised that at its meeting of September 23, 1999, the Board of Adjustment continued your
hearing for approval of a 15' side yard variance from the 30' side yard setback requirement for
property zoned R-1 and located at 2890 Lamar St. to their next regular meeting of October 28, 1999.
Staff will publish and notice the hearing; the property will need to be posted on October 14. Staff
will have signs available for you to pick up on Wednesday, October 13.
Please feel free to contact me at (303) 235-2846 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Barbara Delgadillo
Senior Secretary
/bd
cc: WA-99-22
C:\Rarb-\B0A\C0RRESMwa9922.wpd
PUBLIC HEARING SPEAKERS' LIST
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT
TO: Board of Adjustment
DATE OF MEETING: October 28, 1999
DATE PREPARED: October15, 1999
CASE NO. & NAME: WA-99-22/Alldredge
ACTION REQUESTED:
LOCATION OF REQUEST:
NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT(S):
NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER(S):
APPROXIMATE AREA:
PRESENT ZONING:
PRESENT LAND USE:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
SURROUNDING LAND USE:
DATE PUBLISHED:
DATE POSTED:
DATED LEGAL NOTICES SENT:
ENTER INTO RECORD:
CASE MANAGER: M. Reckert
Request for a 17' variance from the side yard setback
requirement of 30'
2890 Lamar Street
Robert Alldredge
2890 Lamar Street
Same
15,930 square feet
Residential-One
Single-Family Residential
N, S, E, W: Residential-One
N, S, W: Single-Family Residential E: Church;
October 8, 1999
October 14, 1999
October 5, 1999
Q COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
(X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS
(X) ZONING ORDINANCE
O SLIDES
Q SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS
(X) EXHIBITS
O OTHER
JURISDICTION:
The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and
all notification and posting requirements have been
met, therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case.
I. REQUEST
The applicant is requesting approval of a 17' variance to the 30' required sideyard setback adjacent to
a public street. Purpose of the variance is for construction of a detached garage. Pursuant to Section
26-10(F), any side yard which abuts a public right-of-way shall have a minimum setback of 30'.
II. SITE PLAN
The property is located at the southeast corner of West 29th Avenue and Lamar Street. It is bordered
on the east by a quasi-public use (church). There is an approximate 5' grade change between W. 29'h
Avenue and the proposed garage location. An existing 6high privacy fence runs along both the north
and east property lines.
The property currently has two structures on it which are non-conforming relative to the setback in
question including a detached shed which is 13.8' from the property line. An attached carport also
encroaches into the same setback. It appears to be in line with the shed setback; however, it is
difficult to ascertain by the survey.
When the property was purchased in 1995, the applicant made inquiries regarding construction of a
garage using the shed's non-conforming setback (see attached exhibit `A'). Pursuant to Section 26-
7(D) Non-conforming Structures, single-family accessory structures can be expanded in line with the
non-conformity; however, once they are removed, any new structure must comply. The applicant has
realized that although that is still possible to build using the existing structures, the investment in the
garage does not warrant the use of the wall of a dilapidated shed. The applicant intends on
demolishing both the shed and the carport. There is an existing attached single car garage on the
property. See Exhibits `B' and `C' which are an explanation of the request and building elevations.
In regard to Exhibit `C', the applicant has indicated that he will be reorienting the elevation of the
garage so that the dormers will face west and match the house elevation. This is not consistent with
what is currently shown on Exhibit `C'. Revised elevations won't be submitted until the time of
building permit.
Although the property is oversized (15,000 square feet where 12,500 square feet is required), it is
heavily treed which precludes placement south of the house.
III. VARIANCE CRITERIA
Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a variance request:
1. Can the property in question yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if
permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in
which it is located?
Yes, if the variance is denied, the property could still be used as a single family residence.
WA-99-22 Page 2
Board of Adjustment
2. Is the plight of the owner due to unique circumstances?
There are unique circumstances in that the applicant intends on replacing two existing non-
conforming structures with a properly designed, more aesthetically pleasing garage which is
more consistent with the neighborhood. A grade change between the street and the property,
an existing 6' high fence and heavy foliage will provide visual buffering.
3. If the variation were granted, would it alter the essential character of the locality? .
Because the garage will be appropriately designed to match the peakline of the existing house,
it should not alter the character of the area. There would be more impact on the neighborhood
if it were built south of the house removing many of the existing trees.
4. Would the particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the
specific property involved result in a particular hardship (upon the owner) as
distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were
carried out?
The lot is regularly shaped and does not constitute a hardship.
5. Would the conditions upon which the petition for a variation is based be applicable,
generally, to the other property within the same zoning classification?
All applications are reviewed on a case-by-case basis thereby changing the outcome for each
request.
6. Is the purpose of the variation based exclusively upon a desire to make money out of the
property
Although the applicant will be investing a good deal of money into construction of the garage,
the request is not economically motivated.
7. Has the alleged difficulty or hardship been created by any person presently having an
interest in the property?
The hardship has been self-imposed.
8. Would the granting of the variations be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located?
Granting of the variance should be an improvement to the neighborhood as the structure will
be properly designed and will be architecturally consistent with the house on the property.
WA-99-22 Page 3
Board of Adjustment
9. Would the proposed variation impair the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent
property or substantially increase the congestion in the public streets or increase the
danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property
values within the neighborhood.
Because the variance requested will be on the "street side " of the lot, there should be no
negative affects on light and air to adjacent properties. The properties which will be impacted
the most are a quasi-public use (church) and a single-family residence on the north side of
West 29' Avenue. The grade change, existing foliage and screening fence will provide visual
relief for these adjacent properties. There will be no negative affects to the public safety as all
appropriate building codes will have to be met.
10. If it is found in criteria 8 and 9 above that granting of the variation would not be
detrimental or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood, and it
is also found that public health and safety, public facilities and surrounding property
values would not be diminished or impaired, then would the granting of the variance
result in a benefit or contribution to the neighborhood or the community as
distinguished from an individual benefit on the part of the applicant, or would granting
of the variance result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities?
Approval of this request would result in an individual benefit, although, the proposed
structure will be properly designed and more aesthetically pleasing than if the shed were
expanded to accommodate the garage space.
IV. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION
Staff concludes that while there is no proven hardship but rather unique circumstances since the
applicant will be replacing two existing non-conforming structures with a garage designed to
architecturally match the house. The two properties which will be most impacted are buffered by
existing grade change, fencing, and foliage. Heavy foliage precludes placement of the garage on the
south side of the house. There will be no negative impact on the public safety or welfare. For these
reasons, a recommendation of approval is recommended.
V. RECOMMENDED MOTIONS
Option A: "I move that Case No. WA-99-22, a request by Robert Alldredge for approval of a 17'
variance to the required 30' sideyard setback next to a street for R-1 zoned property located at 2890
Lamar Street, be APPROVED for the following reasons:
1. There are unique circumstances because the applicant will be replacing two existing
non-conforming structures.
2. There will be visual buffering for the properties most impacted.
3. There will be no negative affect on the public safety and welfare.
4. Placement elsewhere on the property will require the removal of existing mature
trees."
WA-99-22 Page 4
Board of Adjustment
Option B:' "I move that Case No. WA-99-22, a request by Robert Alldredge for approval of a 17'
variance to the required 30' sideyard setback next to a street for R-1 zoned property located at 2890
Lamar Street, be DENIED for the following reasons:
1.
2.
3."
E:QRecken\wa9922sr.wpd
WA-99-22 Page S
Board of Adjustment
I
~ W
i
N g o, ~ W °n
O~
5
Ily - W F, 1 N w
W MST AV
5
~ :
R-IAffi
'O ST TES FIRST 5PANI5H
PARK ASSEMBLY OP GOD
SUB
~ Z
w xin a
V/ 0 ¢
IN
N
N
2696
2686
26)0
2660
2663
2650
2651
b
N
P
ry
S
qq
d
~u
rv
N
~
£
2 to
L
OFFICIAL
ZONING MA
-
I
- PARCEL/LOT BOUNDRYY
WHEt~T RI DG~
(DESIGNATES OWNER5HIP>
COLORADO
CITY LIMIT LINE
W
-
ATER FEATURE
MAP ADOPTED: June 15, 1994
* DENOTES MULTIPLE ADDRE55E5
Last Revision: January 9, 1995
e
u
f-I
LER
w 5, Ave
SU
O F
0 W0 Ave
N z93o mn~ ~ ~ S B
l~l 25
SCALE 1-=400
D5'ARTM@!r OP PL"% MD MV aa'peff - 23,-2652
r
7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE
P.O. BOX 638 The City 01
WHEAT RIDGE. CO 80034-0638 (303) 234-5900
Wheat
City Admin. Fax # 234-5924 Police Dept. Fax # 235-2949 Ridge
March 13, 1995
Mr. Robert L. Allredge
902 Wadsworth Blvd., Suite #3
Lakewood CO 80215
Dear Mr. Allredge:
Please let this letter serve as confirmation regarding expansion
of a nonconforming structure located on property addressed as
2890 Lamar Street.
According to our discussion of last week, you indicated that you
would like to purchase the property referenced above as long as
the existing shed structure (which has a nonconforming setback),
can be enlarged. Pursuant to Section 26-7(D) of the Wheat Ridge
Code of Laws, a single-family dwelling or accessory structure
with a nonconforming setback can be enlarged provided that the
lot coverage requirements can be met and the addition does not
encroach beyond the existing nonconforming setback line. No
additional living units can be created by the expansion.
I have reviewed the improvement location certificate for the
property and have discussed your proposal with the building
inspector with the conclusion that a building permit can be
issued for the expansion as long as all pertinent building codes
can be met.
If you need further clarification or have any questions, do not
hesitate to contact me at 235-2848.
Sincerely yours,
Meredith Reckert
Planner
MR:slw
CC: Ron Selstad
Zone verification log
EXHIBI'T' A
Robert L Alldredge August 27, 1999
Judy M Sykes
2890 Lamar St
Wheat Ridge, Co 80214
To: City planning department
Re: Variance for a garage at the above address
We are requesting that we be able to build a 2 car detached garage on
the north side of our lot that would encroach into the side yard set back.
Please see enclosed plot plan of existing structures that currently
encroach into the side yard set back. Both the carport and the storage
building existed in their present location when we bought the property.
See enclosed Improvement Location Certificates.
I discussed with the City Building Department prior to our purchasing
the property; the concept of us building a new 2 car detached garage
some time in the future. They indicated that if we used the existing north
wall of the storage building as our northern wall of the new garage, they
felt that it would be an acceptable situation.
What we really want to do is to locate the new 2 car detached garage 13
feet from the north side of our property line. The north wall of the garage
would be in line with the north edge of the carport and therefore would
not set any closer to W 29th than currently exists. The east wall of the
new garage would be 11 feet from the rear of our property line that backs
up the church parking lot.
After the garage is built, or before if necessary, we will tear down both of
the carports and the storage shed. Part of the shed and half of the car
port has already been removed. We have already relocated 3 large pine
trees to other locations on our lot to save the trees and in anticipation of
building the garage.
We feel the new garage and the removal of the carports and storage shed
will be an attractive change to the overall looks of our home. We believe
anyone can see by the money and time we have spent on our property,
that we are interested in making it an attractive, pleasant and
compatible property and an asset to the Wheat Ridge community.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
4 ~ l'
Robert L. Alldredge
EXHIBIT B 13---7
~II
v~ ..C
Si IKFC'C
EXHIBIT C
, 0" m'. 5
=S 3P2
P Jao Co.w
:-r9 .
3°x L`~ L-oi
i
L
K
g:
j~)0~~ L:CdlfL N ljll W~N'Jau~`'~`r~
~I I i 0
a
1 ~
ea
I k
I I I ~ K
1=
rw
a6
-x-&- ~
^J
y
K
J
1
cc J _
G ~
_ y
o r•i - ~I a 3 J D 4 .p - _ - E m 9
O ' -rl J I - J J
>n 1 ' •-"J is " L - 1J 9 6:
ly:
co Z
o c_ I ? u N Q _ xcu sr
0 ] S J rJ E 7 F' W (7
D ~ .C o L-' Q
i k1 4., p N~ 3.
.n.. J N L i J K
I ~ 0. Oo~~ ya ~.'OG.+a
- - o a 4•b
O
X.0
c v a a ami m
I t O A - v-m"m
ti 0 U) Q - _ - y J r. t m
06
G} - I - a S v j C 7 v 3'0 a~
LL: z
O r - ' i L .il rn- O m
< CL
Cn O Q C ! P m j c o V m K m
F- L3 0
Z c7 Z \ o w > >Y• axi 0 F:
04
J W L 1 1 T _ Ol C'"C V d y Oy
1S1 c O W+~ - y v m` v
= Boa>u
a t Zrl
Q fl) I v _ > J oL ,Vm
1
r r ~
.,i
i y
S~r'~ ui
iHtN~ht L
D
0
j
c 9
a
o
^
a n
'
2
v ~
=
_ o
m
t
O
-
C
~
0
ro
s
Ln
• i Q-
O
I I O
O 1!7
Q
C7
a
O
0
Q
O
J
O
u
F-
Z
U O
U
co
Z
O
co
x
w
0 U-
mw
U
It z
.
0.
O
LL Q
w
.0
O x
z0
zw
O x
a
w
u It
W •r
12' N
0
LLI
W
Z
J
E
Q
U
H
Z
H £
u q
a ~z
Q
B
T
o m
a
t m m
N Q
❑ W
z H
N Z
c 7
m En
LLJ
Lu m
(n M F
rn m
F- w
C
~r
h
❑
Z
Q
W
❑
W
0
z a
O 4
N
w a
W H
n r°i
w
O
o x
T
c ~
J
U
O
G
A
O
m
O
U W
O
Y m m
m
O m $
c
❑
o C a
a
g
q
O~ cU
°N
z
Q
N m
n._
m ]
N D
c O
x
o
L_ o
mH
n E
W
U
O
Z
a
N I
-I
m G
O Z
l o T
0
U N
I m
H
`
1 0 c
o a
I ° m
m H
I o c
H 1
1
m o
U ° i
_
D
C W I
>
m a I
m m
❑ I
~ `O L
N C
I
m color o
I
N` 'y
D N
m
N Q I
N D D
o I
` `
~ O I
m N m
E 1
w'y
O h l
L T a
qq
m
I
t 'y g
Z
Q S I
a 5
N
'
W O m° I
m N
w
W0 ca o 1
y y o
i
E
U w m
o A m `o
m w m l
c m=
W 3 c 1
m c w
i
O
m
0
T m m
H
c 1
`
m c
o
a E y c;
L E a m
c m
rnW
i
n
E
o a
mx
i
L o
~
V
N
S
° c
L
p i
3 9 3
C I
p m y
G ~
~ O O
m
U O
I
m - I
N
1
j
O
'c c~ o Z
m -0
m
m
Z
m H°
0
a m m P
v n W
3
c x
c
s w
0
_
3 O Z
S m m rl
D
m
Z
W
c
S m°
H
H
cz
E c
m
O
Y a Q
m u `
'
[
W
Z H
O w W
-r,
a, m
0
O F x `E, W
c d
❑
H W m
H H
c a
O
PI O 1-1
Q C
z
L
u 1-1 N W O
U) H m a0
d
m
a a W
w H rI Q gnc
n
O kk44
;
5
c''c .
W
w Z m
w Q
El w x w
W H a C O
;
m a
c '3
r
W
0 a
° m E
W
o
Z
a
z H m
H
O
m
W a W
7
n
0 -
H ca 0 C4 U
D
H I Zi c Z 4f
o o
s m
mW
.
x
w a r W F
Q a
c
c A
❑
a
H
m
G4 Q
O
x m x
N
c
C$ D
E-E Z 0
H Q O
o
O W m q W m
m
>
8
W O Q
m W Q u'H
i
w m 0
W H H O?
H a
w a 2 u1
c p
O
H O
O
c r
L)
W
E~
O O
m I`p D
❑
w W d .1
O
m
a
W C N U
Irm
u'j
.-1 m E+
m W U H H
o
E+ r. m m -
o
D y
0
En
0
d
o
~,p
w
° Q o
a s
m
o
w m
a
d
c
r
4
. El 0: Q
-C
W
C
w W W
O tO
r
o O W w m
~
P
Z
L
4
W
y
4 W W H WI
r'
m h
y D L
m m
W Q
E+ Z
m
m
2
W a w
z Q w m
c `o
w P. O
Q W O E
l" n
1
c
~
U
°1
_
NE
vqm
P, H
m
m,
at
m
o
s
H
m e
h 5
n
Q m o
c
A
`a
N W U
E Q U
m
m
ti£ W
Q
Q H W a~
'
5
>
a:
m 2 a: E
3
; >
8
z t0 Q
0
H Z Q [ry • D
¢
w D N m
z
,
C•}
A4
z
m
C
w U
U H
V
3
U
U
H Z 3 H P~ O
3 I
o
d x
O m
x W
W x z w
H
~
n
H CO O
W H -O .
y m
n
Q m
D m
N
n D
m ~
n c m
m m
m -
U O` m
m m g
n ° m
L
m V
B 5 n
Q ~ N
c .E
m
C U N
N 5
N 7
q c
mn c m>
C N ~ S
a o
`m o o
8 ~
m ~ O m
m Z• m ~
m - L
m `m
° c
Z D m o
W c c D
W m N m
p m m o
L N
¢ N
w c 75 L
w p J D
w m ¢ m
° d
m
q m
z
Q D 6 L
Z `o 0
Q N C
m
¢ a m
Q V m
3 L C L
- LL
a " (wr
~ w
m ~ E 3
(LIl t C m
o m m
w
E c m z
c 1-
~ O H
m m z
y m
E Z5
~ N ° ~ y L D
3 C
D N D L p m
m ~ C N
aN C m A c o
m N - pj L O -
m m n m
Am 3 E Z
L ` L m o
m
0
3 c m 3 m y
N c~ N m c
m> n c E m m
D o m ° n
m N ci E o
C O ip m U U
E m z
n ° ° `m a`~ m 'n Z
N j c `CO C N Z
C D 2.S E T m
= y D m m y
3 W C N C m
m m vi m D
D y U m m~ C
n E n m vi ~
' m N V1 L m D T
D m c c c D=
D~= C U m m D
`m
m O m m m T~
c ° m
mdES-S~'y~
~ L
m N L~ C j m
° t m mt0 0 3
> a O m o
' torn m m m D y
n
m E L ~ -
~ L N O' C C N
N C N p m C
d h N Q N
D C m D y S A C
y mm °t ~E
N yv~~
m m 'y N N m 6 N
5 =
L E m
D L ~ % n
9 Q` d d~ o m
L T m
O 'v o c Y.
Z c m $ m Y°i
Q °
w y t N° c
m L - G O y
O i0 D d v Y c
F n D -
m m ~
m >v
.5661 Z M
`Q~i art~ 000 livis
z~ ~ ~e/v
V
rS
I
L
a
o
Q
_
zw
D
m m
N
E
n
Z
, Q
h
D
D
m
C
L
a
a
T
y
Iz
E
-E
E
C c
v
❑
z
N
O
~
77 U')
P
41
t G Z W O
+ Q H O
n H 7
v m W
W
F
U
[r
y6~
~ O
5 m
W
c+7 F U
Z
E E H
ac~
m
a
E Q
r
z
c
o
-OO V
r~l
❑Q w
Zy
q6
qq
O FHH W
¢ W
° n
H DD u o
0 W-
w
O
O
O
3
m
w
°
~ C1
ULL
y O
c
N Ww
~o U O w
O }
❑
4v
O
[
E
o
D
z
3
v
W
~
Q
m
r'I F
'I
a r o
d
'
°
U)(()
y w P. E
+
E m W O N
O p
3
z
c
U0
c ❑ zz O o yOvl
c
C E-4
>
c
a
❑
o of W
c
H D .IC
g
m
m
1-
C
b
0
0
O
w
W
❑
}
H
Z
Q
¢
¢
Q
3
;aF ~HEgrP LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION of vHEArP
o a
Planning and Development Department °
7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
~~C OR PDO Phone(303)235-2846 °oc oRPO°
(Please print or type all information)
o e w,+ L- A N -Jvn Address 2S90 1 21 mDc l~ Phone 3'1
Applicant -R
-
~5 U.~y Im. S~kCS City W~e<l., l\.id4e
Owner 'bst.J L• Hi6el,, Address ~~`t~ L anna> Phone 231-2 8i
City Ls~teaf~I i~~~
Location of request (address) Fs9FS t
Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions li
ste
d below which pertain to your request.)
❑ Change of zone or zone conditions
Variance / Waiver
❑ Site development plan approval
❑
Nonconforming use change
❑ Special Use Permit
❑
Flood plain special exception
❑ Conditional Use Permit
❑
Interpretation of Code
❑ Temporary Use, Buildings, Signs
❑
Lot line Adjustment
❑ Minor Subdivision (5 lots or less)
❑
Planned Building Group
❑ Subdivision (More than 5 lots)
❑
Street Vacation
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
❑
Other:
Detailed description of the request: N t aw
c k cl c ti
at e r , ch 133 e 1-
.
~ e y -a k b
Fill out the following information to the best of your knowledge.
Current Zoning: -
Size of Lot (acres or square footage): -''t tt c t"e-
Current use: S F
Proposed use:
Assessors Parcel Number: to q 03 1 S3 3 o o I
I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge
and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above,
without whose consent the requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners
must submit power-of-attorney from the owner which approved of this action on his behalf.
Signature of Applicant -4 - Fr A!L ~ta~Y a~
Subscribed apnd~ sworn to p4f this day oft , 19 q2
V
f /l~ G~K/
No ary Public
My comrAftr Wp1pCApn Expires 6-21 ;
Date received Receipt No. r 3 Case No.
Related Case No. Zoning - Quarter Section Map es
&16-
Edward T.Lightner
2895 Lamar St.
Denver Co, 80214
Ph. (303) 237 0308
Dear Members of the Planning Division;
In regard to Case No. WA-99-22 Which is a request for approval of a 15 foot side
variance from the 30 foot side yard setback requirement for property located at 2890
Lamar St.
The writer of this letter owns 2895 Lamar St. the property directly West of the above
mentioned property and also 2801 Lamar the property South West of the 2890 Aldrich
property. My Wife Lanny and I have No objections to the proposed variance.
The Aldriches property is well maintained and we feel confident that any addition will
reflect good architectural taste. In conclusion, the variance would provide for easy
access to the garage and We understand their desire for this variance.
Sincerely
Edward T. Lightner
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT on September 23, 1999, at 7:30 p.m. at 7500 West 29th Avenue,
Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or
submit written comments. The following petitions shall be heard:
Case No. WA-99-21: An application submitted by Suzanne Hatcliff for approval of a
waiver from Section 26-30 (N) which requires a 20' wide and 25' long paved driveway for
property located at 4200 Iris Court.
2. Case No. WA-99-22: An application submitted by Robert Alldredge for approval of a 15'
side yard variance from the 30 foot side yard setback requirement for property zoned R-1
and located at 2890 Lamar St.
Barbara Delgadillo, Recording Secretary
ATTEST:
Wanda Sang, City Clerk
To be Published: Wheat Ridge Transcript
Date: September 3, 1999
C:\Barbara\BOA\PUBHRGS\990923pub.wpd
7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80215
August 31, 1999
Dear Property Owner:
The City of 4WHE4T~O
Wheat c ,m
GRid.ge
cOZORNOO
This is to inform you that Case No. WA-99-22 which is a request for approval of a 15 foot side
yard variance from the 30 foot side yard setback requirement for property located at 2890 Lamar
St. will be heard by the Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment in the Council Chambers of the
Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue. The meeting will be held on September 23,
1999, at 7:30 p.m.
All owners and/or their representative of the parcel under consideration must be present at this
hearing. As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing
and/or submit written comments. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to notify any other
persons whose presence is desired at this hearing.
If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at
235-2846. Thank you.
Planning Division.
C:\Bubua\BOA\PUBHRGS\wa9922cert.wpd
(303) 234-5900 • ADMINISTRATION FAX: 234-5924 POLICE DEPARTMENT FAX: 235-2949
v
N =I
d
?
N
`
d
N
ry
C
O
~
~
a
N
Q
~
C
M
'v
u
m
n
d
K
o
`
Z
v
~
mi
i
Z
K
c
7
I
I
I
K
>
K
o
o
N
1~
W C
N
°
d E o
a
u
0
L O ~p
na c
E N O
N-
~
N
N
N_
N
N
N
N
x m a
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
v
m° w
U
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
u
O
u
f6
N
d
v
a
N
~ e
a
v
~
L
U v
C
N
Qj O
N
. O
N
m
O
N
N
O
N
O O
A
N
d O
N j N
c c 0
O
m>
w
cQ
N
my
?
V >N
cQ
d.~W
cN
.
L(A
m w w
aN
O N N
>
N
0
M
d`
O
m 0
`
U
, U
m r o
d
d
u
i
E
.2
D
a
Y
E
J N
m
E
a
m
y
D
N N
R N N
2
N N
N
6
Z
J
v
Q
J
mm d
ON
W
W
a
N?)'O
2!
c2!"6
NNg
T
'O
C
'O
TO
N
d
N
Q
_
-Md'
ROK
ctO~
;
mK
L
V 0'
ym~
U~d'
.J
JN N
aN M
YM N
W N!0
ON i0
~N iC
m N
N N
m
~L
L
O~> L
>L
L
L
'a-.~L
N
c N t
Q
d
E
Q
50
d r x
y
iw
E
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑
z
d
U_
r
LU
Q
M
a
M
M
M
M
M
N
O
`
~
c
n
m
m
m
m
ao
Q
co
o
`
v
m
~
v
_
m
v
v
a
m
v
m
m
m
m
w W 0
E
m
m
H > U
z'
Qw
W
0 Fn
N ❑
U
0 Q
Z
a
Z
O W
LO g
Una a
~I
N
O
CP.
F
[L~
0
P.
m
b
CG
w
0
d
z
u
0
v
v
T
L
bt
d
.-1
d
V
aN
0
v
E
z
H
III
I G N
W ~ i
I/ n _ \I J
t z'
y
i
i
i
I
i
a
m
p ~
U CL
}
>
i
r
w
G
r•
Q C:J
1"^
z
N.~
Jc>
_
V
rl .Z
V O N
l
C
l7 N -IL
w
o
wo
1'v: ~v _Cvd
c~
e
Hazy
O
3c
Lu
o~cJOO r•wr
-
p'
-
>
M wv,zz
C T••
co <
Z w J 0 1 w W U Q
w O
`
V•
-
060J O=ZZ
m <Z
LL
.
'
v
V
a v r
¢ G N J M S 3t W M N
K g~
I 3.c
- m'
o: id
.
~j
c u
0
U U
z
Z
Z
C r Q n1 :J 3]
_
.
\
s
:..4 i {I x:.}? L J _
j
_
O J
G
r
n O
'
~
rz
rnZ
G
~r
Q~;
000:-dG Z
f=
"ORC0
3
N
u
V
O
Q
O :J J `f
U Y
.
u.l .
0
~
i j
• ..LL _e-S"z
L. d
Z
U
Z ZO W z
y~ a-
Wl•-'•.--: WOOQGJ
i
_
~
O
:A
0
i.-.r
Z 2
.vv i
.e sr
- V O
-
O
-
'
-
"
:N O _
a O 0 r W
Z
Tf - - a+~
SwCtliN's^"
- i
'
G q
p••.
.
-i -
-a
Z
Or OGJZ
w
i i
U-
B
{ij
Q
.-~tnZ WCOh
d~
y
~
-
.8'9£
cfc
G i W
r
- G 2 W U Q
S
S
;
~ z
2
a
-
Q
~
Z
Z N r t L V]
'
j
~ _ 1
.
m
U
o
Id-
w
-
x=
~
O N Y O
,
y
ar
T
r
j
w_ L Z N O
N U W T UI Z
~
i
J J
I
w
. J
<
> q
^
L
3 W 4.i
O W rOQ o] W N O
y
_ J/
:SN l
O O N<
~
'
~
2
y `_.Th.T~
c
O+•6
i~T ~rr<.3.5
L'2:
1
4 . ~
~c+
C q-. }
._.OUZGCO O:A O
g
T
oo-
~ ~..%i
t vl: v
v
cc:+ W
¢
Qz a•-•dwc¢
WJ '~JLLJ J Z
.
- -
.
i a C
O
• L^ G Q : i O W C=
d
r
r
J
~
a V m
=
(50
G -
✓
iz wrE+
w~:-
3 C)
5 J CD
Z
'c a q
r
=D
'
+
j0
oOw zwrC .Or aCD OZ
CD W
yT
wZC
'S
•
d O
i
N W
.
W GU QQ
W U
S li Zw2 ZwSM ~«+w
L r
'
c4
¢
w
w a
}
aL
S
2 <
`
2
x
r
r
a
a
V
'u z
.z^
:7
^ 1
^
V
w
m
a ~
a
Z -
:ir w
Z
W
r
eZ
l.1 Z
m=
U
O Z
j a
.7 4
- J
Z
;
J
C
A J
Z
_
`
-
J %
r
> Z
..I Z
W Y
y
m
- U
J
Q d
- }
F Z
L x
m
C
J
< U
a'
1 r
Q
U
O
Z }
Z O
L
-
}r Z
J J
z
p x
G y
m
O
=
y
IL
s
s
O
h
h v
O
_
r
\
a
W
u
U
c
i
¢
Z
d w
Z Z
J
ti
Q
L V\-
Lou W
r3 co
W
x >
> a
p
W r
J n
w
r
Z 0
U
W X
J o
Q W
z
= _
a _
U
Z r
CA
W
C6
a J
a w
0 C:
W
Z a
<
V
O U
L
O=
W e
L= =
a
N a
0
a
~a
W a
¢ a.
Z
Er _
Wro
a
W
0
¢
LL
Ir
O z
r.p
O
Z C>
N
a
U
'r
O r
i
(L
w m
m n
r a
:i .
6E
S~
C VO
CyL
a $E
:ae
xa
~ =c
3
5m~
=a
F¢U
iF
7 in
N
> m
0
~ U
w0
a 0
y.
y J
tL
wr C
W r
m~
~z
~ J
Z Y
a
.V C
d
h
N
:J
i
a
i
c
S
Z
3.
O
k':
\I
Q
6
2
Q
a
J
a
n
s
^
L
a
C
N
io
W
0
a
N
p
Z
O
1 Z
Vj J
} L)
a L)
O a`
C
< 12)
U w
J
~ •J
a~
N p~
d A
E m
W U
yN
° m
Y
w N
N
T
O
S
d
N
N
U
X1,1
IE -
° i
a
w
i
m
O
T Z
p y C
O A U O
T N m D j m C
9 N N
N
O N 3 mO C 6
W d
~i d d > > O O
d d S S O O p d
> > 'p 'p n a y N
S D: N N Q Q K U
I
I
i l
~ I
m
m
N~'
s E °m BNB: E ( 0 10 n
L! Lwo A c'l 41 N J.'., 3 2
O
Z
d d N
O O N
E E= O' z H a m m ° y
Z Z N N N N C d N y
m c v t v E W vl U
° N J LL° W = Q N O. Q Z .N+ V
y J IL d d Q f0 S d N d d d f0 W
m a a 3 3 a~ a 3 T 3 ° ~ T~ w
U Q Q O O Q U Q O U O a. in U O K
N
O
Q
a
Q
O
O
D
0
U
s
N!
L
c
c
N
o
p
6
a
U
~
v
y
O
J
N
N
3
p
0
a
i
Z
LL