HomeMy WebLinkAboutWA-99-247500 West 29th Avenue The City of
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215 Wheat
FAX 303/235-2857
November 4, 1999
Mr. and Mrs. Dyke
3159 Depew Street
Wheat Ridge, CO 80215
RE: WA-99-24
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Dyke :
Ridge
Please be advised that at its meeting of October 28, 1999, the Board of Adjustment approved your
request for approval of a 192 square foot garage size variance to the maximum of 600 square feet
allowing a 792 square foot garage for property zoned R-1C and located at 3159 Depew Street with
conditions.
Attached is a copy of the Certificate of Resolution stating the Board's decision which became
effective the date of the meeting, October 28, 1999. Should you decide to appeal the decision of the
Board, you will need to notify the Jefferson County district court in writing within 30 days of the
Board's decision
Please feel free to contact me at (303) 235-2846 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
4e-~f
Barbara Delgadillo
Senior Secretary
/bd
Attachment: Certificate of Resolution
cc: WA-99-24
C:Tab=\B0A%C0RRESF~wa9924.wpd
CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTION
I, Ann Lazzeri, Secretary to the City of Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment, do hereby
certify that the following Resolution was duly adopted in the City of Wheat Ridge,
County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, on the 28th day of October, 1999.
CASE NO. WA-99-24
APPLICANT NAME: Stanley Dyck
LOCATION: 3159 Depew Street
Upon a motion by Board Member ABBOTT and second by Board Member HOVLAND,
the following resolution was stated:
WHEREAS, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and
WHEREAS, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-99-24 is an appeal to this
Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and
WHEREAS, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law, and in
recognition that there were no protests registered against it; and
WHEREAS, the relief applied for may be granted without substantially impairing the
intent and purpose of the regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Board of Adjustment Application Case
No. WA-99-24 be, and hereby is, approved.
TYPE OF VARIANCE: A 192 square-foot maximum detached garage variance from
the 600 square-foot maximum detached garage requirement for the purpose of building a
792 square-foot garage.
FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
There are unique circumstances due to the existing garage converted to living
space in the 1960's and due to the oversized lot. Proportionally, a 600 square-foot
garage on a normal size Rl-C lot would result in 12% coverage. A 792
square-foot garage on a 9,375 square-foot lot results in a 8.4% coverage. Overall
coverage by buildings, house, new garage and converted garage would be 24%.
The maximum allowed coverage by buildings is 40%.
2. There will be no negative impact on the public safety and welfare.
Page 1
Board of Adjustment
Resolution No. 99-24
Page two (2)
3. There will be no negative impact on the character of the neighborhood. The side
yard setback will actually exceed the requirement.
4. The variance should result in a benefit to the neighborhood.
5. Letters of support for the variance have been received from several neighbors.
6. Other garages in this block exist without benefit of setback from said alley.
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
The existing storage shed shall be removed from the property.
2. The structure shall include design features as presented to the Board.
VOTE: YES: ABBOTT, BROWN, HOWARD.
HOVLAND, JUNKER, MAURO
ABSENT: ECHELMEYER, THIESSEN
DISPOSITION: A 192 square-foot maximum detached garage variance from the 600
square-foot maximum detached garage requirement for the purpose of building a 792
square-foot garage was granted.
ADOPTED and made effective this 28th day of October, 1999.
BOB HOWARD, CHAIR
Board of Adjustment
Ann Lazzeri, Secretary
Board of Adjustment
Page 2
There will no negative effect on the public safety and welfare.
4. Placement elsewhere on the property will require removal of existing mature
trees.
This variance should create a benefit to the neighborhood.
6. A letter of support was given by the neighbor across the street on Lamar.
With the following conditions:
1. The roof structure will include dormers which will match the house and face west
as was presented to the Board.
All portions of the existing shed and carport will be removed.
3. This variance does not set a precedent for expansion of further structures.
The motion passed by a vote of 5-0 with Board Member HOVLAND abstaining, and
Board Members THIESSEN and ECHELMEYER absent.
Chair HOWARD informed the applicant that his request for variance had been granted.
B. Case No. WA-99-24: An application submitted by Stanley Dyck for approval of a 192
square-foot maximum detached garage variance from the 600 square-foot maximum
detached garage requirement for the purpose of building a 792 square-foot garage for
property zoned Residential-One C and located at 3159 Depew Street.
This case was presented by Meredith Reckert. She reviewed the staff report, presented
slides and overheads of the subject property and answered the ten criteria involved in
granting a variance. All pertinent documents were entered into the record. She advised
that all notification and posting requirements had been met and the Board had jurisdiction
to hear the case. Staff recommended approval for reasons outlined in the staff report.
Board Member MAURO commented that the sign was difficult to see from the street.
Stanley Dyck
3159 Depew Street
Mr. Dyck was sworn in by Chair HOWARD. He stated that the garage is planned to be
architecturally consistent with the house and that the existing shed will be removed.
None of the neighbors has expressed opposition to the application for variance.
Board of Adjustment Page 4
10/28/99
Board Member BROWN inquired about the recreation area space planned for the garage.
Mr. Dyck explained that the pitch of the roof and dormers will allow for a second floor
which will be used for recreational space.
Meredith Reckert noted a correction to her earlier presentation. There is a ten-foot
setback from the proposed garage to the rear property line rather than a five-foot setback.
Chair HOWARD asked the applicant if he would consider moving the garage in 15 feet
rather than 10 feet. Mr. Dyck replied that he would rather not move the garage any
further into his yard.
In response to questions from Board Member ABBOTT, Mr. Dyck replied that the
proposed garage will be a two-story structure with dormer windows and a pitch roof that
will conform to the house. The garage will be constructed of brick to match the house.
Upon a motion by Board Member ABBOTT and second by Board Member HOVLAND,
the following resolution was stated:
Whereas, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and
Whereas, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-99-24 is an appeal to this
Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and
Whereas, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law, and in
recognition that there were no protests registered against it; and
Whereas, the relief applied for may be granted without substantially impairing the intent
and purpose of the regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge.
Now, therefore, be it resolved that Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-99-
24 be, and hereby is, approved.
Type of Variance: A 192 square-foot maximum detached garage variance from the 600
square-foot maximum detached garage requirement.
For the following reasons:
There are unique circumstances due to the existing garage converted to living
space in the 1960's and due to the oversized lot. Proportionally, a 600 square-foot
garage on a normal size Rl-C lot would result in 12% coverage. A 792 square-
foot garage on a 9,375 square-foot lot results in a 8.4% coverage. Overall
coverage by buildings, house, new garage and converted garage would be 24%.
The maximum allowed coverage by buildings is 40%.
Board of Adjustment Page 5
10/28/99
There will be no negative impact on the public safety and welfare.
3. There will be no negative impact on the character of the neighborhood. The side
yard setback will actually exceed the requirement.
4. The variance should result in a benefit to the neighborhood.
5. Letters of support for the variance have been received from several neighbors.
6. Other garages in this block exist without benefit of setback from said alley.
With the following conditions:
The existing storage shed shall be removed from the property.
2. The structure shall include design features as presented to the Board.
The motion passed by a vote of 6-0 with and Board Members THIESSEN and
ECHELMEYER absent.
Chair HOWARD informed the applicant that his request for variance had been granted.
C. Case No. WA -99-25: An application submitted by Derek Drummond for a 10-foot side
yard setback from the 15-foot side yard setback requirement for the purpose of building a
two-car garage for property zoned Agricultural-One and located at 4440 Independence
Street.
This case was presented by Meredith Reckert. She reviewed the staff report, presented
slides and overheads of the subject property and answered the ten criteria involved in
granting a variance. All pertinent documents were entered into the record. She advised
that all notification and posting requirements had been met and the Board had jurisdiction
to hear the case. Staff recommended approval for reasons outlined in the staff report.
Derek Drummond
4440 Independence Street
Mr. Drummond was swom in by Chair HOWARD. He stated that his property is
surrounded on two sides by commercial properties, one adjacent neighbor to the north,
and apartments across the street. His plan is to expand his one car-garage to a two-car
garage with room over for additional living space. He stated his neighbor to the north is
in favor of the application.
In response to a question from Board Member ABBOTT, Mr. Drummond explained that
the planned addition would extend an additional 16.5 feet from the existing one-car
Board of Adjustment Page 6
10/28/99
6
PUBLIC HEARING SPEAKERS' LIST
CASE NO: l
S L~
z) A- 9~i- 5
c _
DATE: October 28,1999
REQUEST
3is D E~ ST -
E7 gf)iF5
7- F-o i5
5
Speaker
Name
(PLEASE PRINT)
Address/Phone In Favor / Opposed
3f5
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT
TO: Board of Adjustment
DATE OF MEETING: October 28, 1999 DATE PREPARED: Oct. 19, 1999
CASE NO. & NAME: WA-99-24/Dyke CASE MANAGER: M. Reckert
ACTION REQUESTED:
192 square foot garage size variance to the maximum
of 600 s.f. in R-1C
LOCATION OF REQUEST:
NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT(S):
NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER(S):
APPROXIMATE AREA:
PRESENT ZONING:
PRESENT LAND USE:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
SURROUNDING LAND USE:
DATE PUBLISHED:
DATE POSTED:
DATED LEGAL NOTICES SENT:
ENTER INTO RECORD:
Q COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
(X) ZONING ORDINANCE
Q SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS
Q OTHER
3159 Depew Street
Stanley and Susan Dyke
3159 Depew Street
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Same
9,375 square feet
Residential-One C
Low Density Residential
N: R-3; S, E, W:R-1C
All sides: low density residential
October 8, 1999
October 14,1999
October 5, 1999
(X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS
Q SLIDES
(X) EXHIBITS
JURISDICTION:
The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all notification and posting requirements have been met,
therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case.
I. REQUEST
The applicant requests approval of a variance to build a 792 square foot freestanding garage on property
zoned Residential-One C located at 3195 Depew Street. Pursuant to Section 26-13(F) Residential-One
C Development and Use Regulations., detached garages cannot exceed 600 square feet in area on a
single property. The applicant is requesting approval to build a garage 792 square feet (33'x 24') in size,
thus a 192 square feet variance is required.
II. PROPERTY CONFIGURATION
Existing on the property are a brick Tudor-style home built in the late 1930's, a freestanding garage
which appears to have been converted into living space in 1963 and a shed.. Parking for the property
occurs in a parking pull-out off the alley. There is no covered parking on the parcel.
The property is 9375 square feet in size (125'x 75') which is almost double the minimum lot size
requirement of 5000 square feet in the Residential-One C zone. Although the lot is oversized, the 600
square foot limitation for a freestanding garage must still be followed. The existing shed will be
removed when the garage is built.
Proportionately, a 600 square foot garage on a normal sized R-1 C lot would result in 12% coverage. A
792 square foot lot on a 9375 square foot lot results in 8.4% coverage. Overall coverage by buildings
(house, new garage and converted garage) if the variance is approved would be 24%. The maximum
allowed coverage by buildings is 40%.
Properties such as this over 9000 square feet in size are usually located in the R-IA zone district. In the
R-IA zone district freestanding garages are allowed up to 1000 square feet in size which would compute
to an 11% coverage. Total lot coverage by buildings is allowed up to 30%.
Attached under Exhibit `A' is an explanation of the request. Attached under Exhibit `B' are letters of
support from adjacent property owners.
III. VARIANCE CRITERIA
Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a variance request:
1. Can the property in question yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if
permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in
which it is located?
The property could still be used as it is now if the variance is not approved.
2. Is the plight of the owner due to unique circumstances?
WA-99-24/Dyke Page 2
Board of Adjustment
Circumstances are unique in that the lot is almost double the minimum requirement for the zone
district in which it is located. The only covered parking on the lot was converted to additional
living space in the early 1960's.
3. If the variation were granted, would it alter the essential character of the locality?
Because much of the construction in this area occurred before incorporation, there are many
existing non-conformities in the neighborhood including but not limited to lot width, lot area,
setbacks and additional units. Because the lot is so oversized, Staff believes that the variance
would not have a negative affect of the character of the area. There is no problem meeting. the
required setbacks.
4. Would the particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the
specific property involved result in a particular hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished
from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out?
Staff concludes that there is no hardship.
5. Would the conditions upon which the petition for a variation is based be applicable,
generally, to the other property within the same zoning classification?
Any property owner in the City may apply for the same type of variance. However, each request
is reviewed on a case by case basis, thus the outcome may not be the same.
6. Is the purpose of the variation based exclusively upon a desire to make money out of the
property
This request is not economically motivated.
7. Has the alleged difficulty or hardship been created by any person presently having an
interest in the property?
The hardship is self-imposed.
8. Would the granting of the variations be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located?
No. The construction of the garage will eliminate need for the parking pull-off and shed on the
property and therefore will have a positive affect on the aesthetics of the area. There will be no
negative affect on public welfare.
9. Would the proposed variation impair the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent
property or substantially increase the congestion in the public streets or increase the
danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property
values within the neighborhood.
WA-99-24/Dyke Page 3
Board of Adjustment
There should be no impacts to the surrounding streets. All appropriate building and fire codes
will have to met. The construction of the garage should help aesthetics and possibly, property
values due to elimination of the shed and pull-off parking area.
10. If it is found in criteria 8 and 9 above that granting of the variation would not be
detrimental or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood, and it is
also found that public health and safety, public facilities and surrounding property values
would not be diminished or impaired, then would the granting of the variance result in a
benefit or contribution to the neighborhood or the community as distinguished from an
individual benefit on the part of the applicant, or would granting of the variance result in a
reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities?
Approval of this request would result in an individual benefit.
IV. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION
Staff concludes that there are unique circumstances due to the oversized lot and that proportionately
there should be no more impact than a 600 square foot garage on a 5000 square foot parcel. Staff further
concludes that there will be no negative impact on the public safety and welfare or character of the area.
For these reasons, a recommendation of Approval is given for Case No. WA-99-24 with the condition
that the existing storage shed be removed from the property.
V. RECOMMENDED MOTIONS
Option A: "I move that Case No. WA-99-24, a request for approval of a 192 square foot variance to the
maximum 600 square foot size for a detached garage in an R-1 C zone district located at 3159 Depew
Street, be APPROVED for the following reasons:
1. There are unique circumstances due to the oversized lot.
2. There will be no negative impact on the public safety and welfare.
3. There will be no negative impact on the character of the area.
With the following condition:
1. The existing storage shed be removed from the property."
Option B: "I move that Case No. WA-99-24, a request for approval of a 192 square foot variance to the
maximum 600 square foot size for a detached garage in an R-1 C zone district located at 3159 Depew
Street, be DENIED for the following reasons:
1.
2.
3"
FAR.ke N.0924u.wo
WA-99-24/Dyke Page 4
Board of Adjustment
u
-
h
W 32
ND
o
A
VE
9190
J~
3182
R
3193
3100
tLJ91B9
3110
9 ]9
9170
191M
R
3165
3190
91T1
.j
y1e,,,,r
9110
z91W
9101
~
V 3103
3100
9o9s
~
N
~
_
9091
f
CIS
9013
9
x
5024
5%5
5Wt
W
Ashland Reservoir,
1:~- I
I ~
I
I
R-3
OFFICIAL
ZONING MAP
WHEAT PIDGE
COLORADO
MAP ADOPTED: June 15, 1994
Last Revision: July 14, 1999
ZN
O
q
31%
9199
31%
L
9116
3191
3190
Vw
3171
11,
31T
3153
31N
3139
9139
3137
9190
9100
9 10
3106
B
Saw
S:,SS
903
3
Simi
Sm
9039
9IXA
9019
3010
"..W1
I
9W3
'..rol
3003
2994
YNS
210.3
XW7
2W9
0.2
Al
Me
z9r
29x
3439
39av
33L
I
1939
'3993
a9»
]
2930
2959
2992
N
2939
Y29
N
'N]0
N
2926
?R9
2192
VV
2922
145
'tV21
V21
1910
0.29
3918
L 2917
2915
I 2i19
3914
2913
0.50
1919
F
10
2IX19
N10
1910
3
.
2105
29J3
2901
1%1 '
XAI
21JJ
~
~ W 2981
AVE
~
~
~
]
9" ri'd'
R-3
~
.....3®u`
284
A
~
0
1
1912
2819
}
L
1960
]MN
]BCO
]D01
1780
Q
~~3 ^
TIBI
zr6
_IC
N
2
T110
1
o
Q
[
2112 1
G
12
2
g
277NffiE.
R-IC
R- I CE'
~v
U6
UF5
FG
ED
WATER
L K 14
n
ZONE 015TRICT BOUNDRY
- PARCEL/LOT BOUNDRY
(DE5IGNATE5 OWNERSHIP)
- CITY LIMIT LINE
WATER FEATURE
• DENOTES MULTIPLE ADDRE55E5
12
3
o
u
_
ICHARD HART
27W
:5TATE PARK
TnD
F
naD
2668
PHD
EDGEWATS2
I ww
E 25
runl
9 991W aro 9x
SCALE 1'=400
EPAR(MEM OF PL"NG AND DEeOPMW - 235-2852
i
i
Cl
f1i~ lYo /v /tGl •C/
41
fit
lit
Gr9
I-oGY -7
fin ~ O
. c-
L/ n Y1 ~tiC P !/Inn Q~inl" Q,IJ_~l a 4 P
f
/,~~~4~-
3159 Depew Street
Wheat Ridge, CO 80214
September 12, 1999
City of Wheat Ridge
Planning and Development Department
7500 West 29`h Avenue
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Dear Members of the PD Department,
As Wheat Ridge property owners since 1991, we wish to construct a 33' x 24'
detached garage alongside the rear perimeter of our residential property, abutting
the alley way to the west. Since the square footage of our proposed garage is 792
square feet and city regulations state that the maximum square footage for a
detached garage may exceed no more than 600 square feet, we respectfully
request a variance.
This request is based upon our necessity to build and maintain a 3 car garage. We
are a family of four with both parents being professionals, so each of us requires our
own vehicle. Soon, our twin 14 year-old sons will be driving and since they attend
separate high schools and maintain different schedules, each son will need his own
car or motorcycle. Because our home is 1938 vintage, it provides extremely little
storage capacity. Every typical, active family of four at the turn of this century has
reasonable storage and workshop needs, which this 3 bay garage would help ease.
Since we do not have either a driveway or a garage located on our property, our two
vehicles must be parked alongside Depew Street. At night, during weekends, and
when we travel, we wish to have our vehicles within a secured garage because of
frequent, inclement Rocky Mountain weather and also because of prior vandalism to
our vehicles while parked outside our house along the street. (While this vandalism
has not been so serious as to notify the police, it has occurred. Shortly after our
relocation to Colorado, miscellaneous coins and keys were ransacked from the
unused cigarette receptacle of one vehicle. Another time, items were thrown out
from a locked car onto our front lawn. A neighbor's back glass panel to his vehicle,
parked along the alley way parallel to our property, was broken out approximately
three summers ago. Graffiti has been painted along our fence line parallel to our
alley way.)
Another point which we will stress regarding our property is its distinctive
architecture. Because our residence is a "historical property" (the former home of
Babe Didricksen Zaharias, international women's golf celebrity during the late
1940s and into the middle 1950s), our proposed garage is designed to be
architecturally compatible as well as size proportionate with our three story brick
Tudor-styled home. Architecturally and size-wise, our proposed garage would be
similar to the recently constructed detached garage at 3675 Chase Street, also in
Wheat Ridge.
When we briefly discussed our construction intentions with each of the neighbors
Adjacent to our property, everyone expressed only positive comments regarding the
choice of our design (four dormers, brick facing to match our residence, similar
Tudor styling, 3 bay with secure remote-coded garage doors facing the west alley
way, appropriate setbacks, exterior lighting, concrete foundation, drive ways and
walkways, fenced trash bin area, etc.). Neither the size nor the shape of this
garage project would restrict any neighbors' views or privacy. In fact, neighbors
have quickly said the our proposed garage structure would likely help to continue
the appreciation of all property values within the neighborhood, due to its projected
attractiveness and architectural compatibility with our residence.
Since relocating to Wheat Ridge from southern Kansas eight years ago, we have
grown very fond of the "small town community-feeling" of our neighborhood.. We
plan to remain at our current property for many years provided that our storage,
security, and recreation/study needs can be better achieved with the addition of this
three bay brick-faced garage. Because our family enjoys playing recreational table
tennis and foosball, and because Dr. Dyck is a professor of history at Colorado
Christian University and desires to conduct research and to publish in his discipline,
all four of us would well utilize both a recreational space as well as a private study
and computer work station area.
So, this garage project is the natural extension of our family's active lifestyle. This
garage would provide not only secure, peace-of-mind sheltered parking for all of our
vehicles but it also would offer the space for all four of us to better enjoy various
storage, recreational, and home study options throughout all twelve months of the
year.
Thank you for your kind consideration of our variance request.
Sincerely,
P ~
Stanley P. Dyck Susan K.
D ck
Addendum enclosed
Home owners who reside immediately adjacent to our property:
To the north: Beverly Eston (power of attorney for owner Jeanne Gregory)
5508 West 32nd Street
Wheat Ridge, CO 80212
Unlisted telephone: 303-205-1999
To the south: Mark and Geri Rhodes
3153 Depew Street
Wheat Ridge, CO 80214
Unlisted telephone: 303-232-2958
To the west, across the alley: David and Karen Small
3176 Eaton Street
Wheat Ridge, CO 80214?
Unlisted telephone: 303-232-7883
°F wNegr LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION °F wHEar
ti p ti 90
Planning and Development Department m
7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
°0c oR na° Phone(303)235-2846
°oe oR P°o
(Please print or type all information)
Applicant 4 H e N YJ t cl~ Address 315 q 0Q (Xxlc7 S T Phone o z s
r n City U J L e., f- 1( p C 0 s~ 2-1
Owner 5 ~e Y l/H c Address _1131541 De 0-f J 5'E Phone 3o Z -
'tu o, City f~ 2c~ f ~~~9 ~g02l~(
Location of reque t (address - 110
Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request.)
Change of zone or zone conditions Variance / Waiver
❑ Site development plan approval K Nonconforming use change
❑ Special Use Permit ❑ Flood plain special exception
❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Interpretation of Code
❑ Temporary Use, Buildings, Signs ❑ Lot line Adjustment
❑ Minor Subdivision (5 lots or less) ❑ Planned Building Group
❑ Subdivision (More than 5 lots) ❑ Street Vacation
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final ❑ Other: CL
Detaile des iption of the request: x It/ v CL
- t 2 5. larSZ t t~ GL
V i a ti i V c~ T ~t 1 cu wit u
t, o•0 5 f
Fill out the following information to the best of our knowledge.
Current Zoning: _ h
Size of Lot (acres or squuaarre\f otag 75 1.2,:5 9 7 3f
Current use:
Proposed use:
Assessors Parcel Number: Lo Siufl /of 2 hoe 011
I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge
and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above,
without whose consent the requested action cannot lawf y be accomplished. Applicants other than owners
must submit power-of-alto fr the owner ich a roved of this action on his behalf.
Signature of Apple ep o <
-a--o--o- _ Subscribed and sworn tome this 61A day o6:, 19
PUB L\r,
..0 ,C01I Notary Public
aes: My commission expires -/o
Date received - Receipt No. 0 3 Case No.
Related Case No. Zoning ~L C, Quarter Section Map
VAN DYKE
ENGINEERING INC
9542 W. LOUISIANA AVE.
LAKEWOOD. COLORADO 80232
303-985-8096
303-987-8808 ((.x)
I. h
0
nl
Pos'`~~aJ
n
_4 - (pLLD
W W
D V
'bti 33' .I
LAwl'
3<•-3.
Q~ s
Lqw .J
O
I C6AI- Db'SCfLJ PytON: 4OT 2Z 11 uV 7-HC CO-7A( Vz OF LOF 23,
O LOCe 5, OUA16 C2 Gr)&pOa ~l tX CCWr PFt
2611P B FC~t TN646'OF COU,VOF~IfiF/~QifYy
.STArC OF 0,,00.
h /e// ~ OFF S rJrO~v
~jTn~Aye gem -p
TE /YOV~Y~wc
it
THIS P
IDENTIFIED. FLOOD PLAIN NO).
ERTIEICATE:
HIS IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE WAS PREPARED
mrrm 1 BC.
THAT THIS NOT A LAND SURVEY,
YEP, AND THAT T141S MAP IS NOT TO BE RELIED
OR UPON FOR
IPROVEME TS, SUCH UCH AS FENCES, BUILDINGS, ANY OTHER
TIRE THE EXACT LOCATION OF PROPERTY LINES. L1NE5. I FURTHER
THIS DATE _$-I 'E"'E"TS INDICATED ON THE ABOVE PARCEL WERE AS OF
ALL WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES 10F SAID PARCEL. EXCEPT AS SHOWN. ANCONNECTIONS D THAT THEREE'
ARE NO ENCROACHMENTS UPON THIS PROPERTY BY IMPROVEMENTS FROM ADJACENT
PROPERTIES, EXCEPT AS SHOWN, AND THAT THERE IS NO SIGN OF EASEMENTS CROSSING
OR BURDENING THIS PROPERTY, EXCEPT AS NOTED .I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THE
LOCATION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ABOVE, ARE BASED UPON THE LOCATION OF
EXISTING MONUMENTS IN THIS LOCAL, AND THAT THIS MAP DOES NOT CONSTITUTE
ANY THING BUT AN ILC, AND IS SUBJECT TO ANY INACCURACIES THAT A SUBSEQUENT
IMPROVEMENT SURVEY WOULD DISCLOSE
NOTICE.-
ACCORDING O COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON
ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHI
rrrr vn I N THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH
c~ w . HT HAY ANY I GrAI. ACTON BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY
BE LUMMLNJ ,U MURL THAN IB PLANS FNGM IRE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION
AN
I SHOWN HEREON. [CRS 13-80-105(3.)]
JOB// 947/
tl I
h
Q
Q
3
C;A,E
7z /3,- 0&4o03
W
W
co
LD
>
LU
La
O Z c
o
M
OD
m
m
hie
F U N
Go
co
co
W Z
J O F
Z
O
U)
LU
LU co x
W
0
O
W
.
pcnw
cc C)
Z
~
Ln O
pZU Q
m _
R
m
>
~
Z
p>mw
Q
F
0
?
nJ
O
wf
>
p
R❑
IEC<zI7Z
¢
Oc
Z
Um
-
ZJ
wpZOOZ
Q
crx
UCUa~
F-
N
Lz
U-
0
O
W
W
O
N
2
U.
0
p
w
w
a
F-
U)
0=
LL
Q
h
fA
F-
L m
w * v
JY Y laY C
E O
L
Y
#
m* *
m
a
+ L0
3 0 V
m
J
*
Z
i
m C
w
LL
v* O` Jf f
N
#
m V) U) m m 3
0
D
3
mf #
# N ca
f
"ys, Z m U)
j
.m
* Q m
oof
>
m 3 w m « y~Y 0
Woi
0) z
°s
m# Ozf
vYF- -0 -30-
N
WO
O Q
`
m #
#
3
Of
-
m
m
N
p
~
p
~
Z -o* 00
J3
0
w c
E C
O
cf)
m *
~
c
m
~ m co m
m
r
W
N
m
0Z*
1L W
m z*
c
i
cU
c °
JO
a) .¢f
TQ 0
3- 0, ) 0 C m
0
z>
-2
.
cmfn ,O•,N
;'Y m 0 m
~
a
WU)wm
#
J
m y°
D °
}
aC
he
OW
z
UmU-0.4 m¢*
m
D
m EN -r m c ~FZ
0 a)
O
O
N
y0
c0>
JOf
? y O
c
L j m 0 V)
-00 u-
.n O
0
Y
m
0
f
a
°
3
~
J
'
0 !L
F in
F'
U j, U.
U m a = w
OO
-LZ# #
c-00 c a) LL
^
°
mLL
IL
Z
Ez
¢
y
J F-
¢ ~ 0* xf
y
>W
a) '5 w O
4 0> ° mL m0° o-)
>
tn
--7
¢ OLL c9
ZWf
m D¢„-° m 3 m U
~c°N
K J
~y
O❑ NJ W
(n w# >¢f #
NL 0-0 m" 0-0 S
c
U E 0 m-0 O.
0 ca
LL
E
LL
O
F
-
Y
m
3
Cc
}
}
Z
# m
#
#
W
LL¢
C
O.
a)
CL0 l
° t
'
Q
F
Q
y
L X
LL # Y p f
0
m~ ter- N C U
m c m 0.- 0 O
70
Y
J*
'2* 'm
#
F O
J
LU
y
'C0
p
O
chf W #
O 0
>.l C
•Z m 0.0 r-
LL - m
o
im er
°
- w
-
w
0 a
* 00 # p f
m a E d o 0
o, -o ~
LAD
>
al) CD * tp
m
ui
U)
?
X
x
m m
m p
p ? c
V1 U)
F`J
*
Wf
#
m
~
,
Y -0 m y L -3
c
R S
O¢
Q* -00:# Zf
00
L J M m ) V
y
F' U
m F-
.90 c F- O
m
co m 0 3 i c Y
r
03
p 0
a.J# 0Z# 0#
a)
j ID a)
- r U O)
Wx
F
pc
t0f too* j#
m.3O-yvEcc
m O m
Ly
p?
w m
W O)
Y.3 m- N
# 2 f f
cn
c J m 0
y 0- vmi -p 3 to N m O
r
Oa)
cc cc
-Izf °
f P#
oi r-
~
oc
¢
m
]Y c c E c
„
:3 a)
F' 0
* VO* D_*
W m
Y
~
i
Y m
m
O c
M a) L O m
,
a
U
+ m
° Y D N Y L m m L
w
U
Z
W
W
U.
W
m
z
K
W
x
O
F-
m
O
IL
m
0
Z
p
W
x
Q
F
Q
Q
F-
m
s
x
W
W
N
N
O
co
y U
W
a O
w-
p ~
LO =
m 3
0
N
N
m
~ fq
v y
a
m m
CD °
s Q
Y
U L
L m
U O
3
0
0
J
Z
W
D -
N
Z
cc
O
2
u
J a
x
f
z
~ N
. a
am
H r N
'o m
0 o n
Q o
m Q
° w N
OO g
U LL y
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING j
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT on October 28,1999, at 7:30 p.m. at 7500 West 29th Avenue,
Wheat Ridge, Colorado. All interested citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or
submit written comments. The following petitions shall be heard:
Case No. WA-99-22: An application submitted by Robert Alldredge for approval of a 17'
side yard variance from the 30 foot side yard setback requirement for property zoned R-1
and located at 2890 Lamar St.
Case No. WA-99-24: An application submitted by Stanley Dyck for approval of a 192
sq. ft. maximum detached garage variance from the 600 sq. ft. maximum detached garage
requirement for the purpose of building a 792 square foot garage for property zoned R-1 C
and located at 3159 Depew Street.
Case No. WA-99-25: An application submitted by Derek Drummond for a 10' side yard
setback from the 15' side yard setback requirement for the purpose of building a 2-car
garage for property zoned A-1 and located at 4440 Independence.
Barbara Delgadillo, Reco ing Secretary
ATTEST:
Wanda Sang, City Clerk
To be Published: Wheat Ridge Transcript
Date: October 8, 1999
C:\Bazb=\BOA\PUBffi2GS1991028pub.wpd
The City of
7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80215 Wheat
9Ridge
October 4, 1999
Dear Property Owner:
This is to inform you that Case No. WA-99-24 which is a request for approval of a 192 sq. ft.
maximum detached garage variance from the 600 sq. ft. maximum detached garage requirement
for the purpose of building a 792 square foot garage for property located at 3159 Depew Street
will be heard by the Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment in the Council Chambers of the
Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue. The meeting will be held on October 28, 1999,
at 7:30 p.m.
All owners and/or their representative of the parcel under consideration must be present at this
hearing. As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing
and/or submit written comments. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to notify any other
persons whose presence is desired at this hearing.
If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at
235-2846. Thank you.
Planning Division.
C:\Barbara\BOA\PUBHRGS\wa9924cen.wpd
(303) 234-5900 • ADMINISTRATION FAX: 234-5924 • POLICE DEPARTMENT FAX: 235-2949
P~l
a
a
O
a
N
n
~
a
'a
u
$
a
K
°
10
`
c
z
v
~
al
K
G
7
9
a
O`
0
j
o
IS
E o
`
a
y
U
L ° m
n.O C
m
E
0
.
w
N~a-
#
m
m
m
m
m
A
rn
m
m
x m~
a
m
rn
m
rn
rn
rn
m
rn
m a
¢ m°$
O
m
3
a
3
m
3
m
3
m
3
a
3
m
3
m
3
u
0
O
'1p
in
a°
a
a
a
a
v
E v
N
N
N
>
L N
N
W
N
T N
N
9 N
O
W
O
m
NO
>
w
~
J N
N N
N N
a
0
N
w
0
~6 c0
N O
X
0
d
d
d
N
in0
U
a
v
c 30
a U
`
a30
m a U
3
O a U
3
O a U
E O U
3
a U
U)
`
v
¢ c
°
m.•ai
O N
m
um
a
n
aai
Ql n
aai
L n
Kaai
(U n
ad
0
fn N
ai
:4 W m
m n
Laro
00 m
6
94
a m m
EW:-
v
m cl m
❑ m
❑ m
Y M O-
m
mrn O-
~
mo°
'
R M
'
w N
N
~ma'
a°D m
-O I~CL
ornK
~NLL'
iO R
Own
~(O LL
N 'o n:o
`
m
M
c ,°o t
i+~ m
I- c~ m
M m
=
m m
c
N m
m c~ m
a
-
U~ vc._
° m m
r
9
a
L
c,°~
a
a
L
E
a
L
a
t
a
r L
a
L
-O L
G
~ N 'O a L
u
9
~
~
F
N
C y d wa
¢
f~
Q !F C a N
m 3 C
O
a) 1
O
d c
U a o x
w W
E
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑
a
z
a
°
r
N
L"
Q
O
h
W
rn
O
N
M
O
U'
o
m
m
m
m
m
ro
m
m
Q
W W O
E
m
rn
rn
rn
rn
m
rn
rn
U
z
Q Q W z
0
w=C) Fn
2F, p
j
_
LL
N
O~Q z
o
ow zz
= g
U 12 a
~I
0
C1.
m
z
a
Y U
b
T
P
a
N
w
0
A
z
F
E
O
dim
U N
C U R
A A O)
E m
S ~ N
yEm
N~r
r m
m~ O
a
y O
T
r
d
R
v
d
p y.
1-131
ci
mi
H
p Of
1 N) ry
O
T y z
a m
NO C v c
T y
A ~
CO n m C
3 3 d d > > O
N d y' p' O O G
R' d' N N Q Q ~
I
,
a
v
y
I
n
N
n
O
! N
ik
O
z
d
m
d d
;;6E E
E E z 'z a N w a ti _a o
a A Li N y m .01, d
N_ C b N ~ y
z z m m v c 'o oO E
o a r 'o m 0 y U
N J LL d d Q N O. d N d 5 d N N
N 6 6 O C 6 .T 6 O T O` T tC N
m a a 3 3 0. a 3 3 0 o m
U Q¢ O O Q p Q O U 0 a y U O
0
N
0
a
0
d
U
N
O
a
Q
O
0
c
0
U
d
C C
c o
m
FL
U O
y J ~
IL i z
a
3
O
0
LL