Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/07/1995 AUGUST 7, 1995 STUDY SESSION MINUTES CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 7 00 P.M. The City Council Study Session was called to order by Mayor Dan Wilde at 7 00 P m Councilmembers present Teri Dalbec, Donald Eafanti, Vance Edwards, Jean D Fields, Ken Siler and Claudia Worth Councilmembers absent Rae Jean Behm and Tony Solano Also absent City Treasurer, James Malone Also present City Clerk, Wanda Sang; City Administrator, Robert Middaugh; City Attorney, Gerald Dahl; Director of Planning, Glen Gidley; Director of Parks and Recreation, Gary Wardle; and interested citizens Item 1 Discussion and presentation on bus shelters Mr Gidley, Director of Planning, gave a brief background as to the City of Wheat Ridge Code of Laws which covers and regulates Courtesy Benches The ordinance is fairly specific as to where and how they can be located However, it does specifically exempt RTD bus shelters and any other courtesy bench or shelter that is a City owned or City sponsored courtesy bench shelter Mr Gidley introduced Mr Robinson and Mr Young, representatives of Outdoor Promotions, LLC They presented a background of the shelter bus transit program and business as it exists around the country and the cities they are working with The company is dedicated to committed high quality service The bus transit shelters improve air quality, less cars, less congestion The shelter design and quality is something the City has a direct hand in deciding the style and placement of a shelter Mayor Wilde questioned who owns the present shelters? Mr Gidley stated RTD owns the present shelters The company will consult with RTD to remove the ones that are presently installed If RTD would not want their shelters removed there are many places where shelters could be placed Consensus was 6-0 directing staff to draft an Ordinance regarding the bus shelters, and shelters be allowed with advertising in R3 zone district and higher Staff investigate in changing the profit sharing so the City could locate some shelters with non- advertising in residential areas Staff be authorized to investigate and bring to the City Affairs Committee STUDY SESSION MINUTES AUGUST 7, 1995 PAGE -2- 2 Discussion of Proposed Prospect Park Development Plan Mr Wardle, stated the City purchased the Rock property and the Gillhouse property over the past ten years in anticipation of this project Currently the City has budgeted $400,000 dollars for this project There have been two public meetings to solicit information from the neighbors Phil Morreys, THK Associates, Inc , project manager, and representatives presented the Master Plan Consensus was 6-0 that the master plan that was presented to City Council be taken back to another neighborhood meeting for citizens and neighbors to review and have formal input in making modifications to the final plan Consensus was 5-1 that the playground be changed on the Master Plan to the other side of the concrete path Consensus was 6-0 that at the neighborhood meeting, to get citizen input, that the upper path be discussed as whether to use crusher fine, asphalt or concrete surface 3 Discussion Nonconforming Use Provisions, Zoning Ordinance, Section 26-7 Mr Gidley presented a history and background regarding nonconforming uses within the City and a proposed amendment to Zoning Ordinance, Nonconforming Use Provisions, Sec 26-7 Following a lengthy and heated discussion Consensus was 6-0 to put on as an agenda item at Study Session within the next month for closer scrutiny and study, develop a list of nonconforming uses, plus comments from Mr Dahl and Mr Gidley as to options 4 Discussion Nonconforming Billboards In B-1 Zone Mr Middaugh addressed the subject Consensus was 6-0 that the time frame of January 1, 1996 for enforcement of the law, as stated in Mr Middaugh's memorandum, be extended to July 1, 1996 for legal purposes There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 10 18 P m ~ I ) I ~' titLdA... ...~L,LVC-- Wanda Sang, Cit~~lerk