HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/08/1997
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
7500 W 29th Avenue, Municipal Building
SEPTEMBER 8, 1997
The Regular City Council was called to order by Mayor Wilde at 7 15 P m Councilmembers
present: Teri Dalbec, Jerry DiTullio, Jean Fields, Janelle Shaver, Ken Siler, Tony Solano,
and Claudia Worth Don Eafanti was absent; he is vacationing in Europe Also present:
City Clerk, Wanda Sang, City Treasurer, Jim Malone, City Manager, Robert Middaugh, City
Attorney, Gerald Dahl, Chief of Police, Jack Hurst; staff; and interested citizens
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF August 25, 1997
Motion by Mrs Dalbec for the approval of the Minutes of August 25, 1997, seconded by Mr
Solano, carried 7-0
PROCLAMATIONS AND CEREMONIES
Mayor Wilde administered the Oath of Office to Janet M. Leo, EDARC Commissioner for
District IV
CITIZENS' RIGHT TO SPEAK
Jordan Mencher, 3595 Estes Street, was very upset that commercials for the Clear Creek
Festival of the Arts, that were paid for by the committee, aired only a few times, asked that
the Council instruct the City Attorney to look into this
Maxine Stewart, 3465 Otis Street, treasurer for Citizens for a Wheat Ridge Recreation
Center in 1997, gave update on their committee's activities She asked that citizens support
this ballot question
Mary Duer, 7325 West 48th Avenue, spoke in favor of speed bumps on 48th Avenue, but
thought it might be a little excessive to have six speed bumps on such a short stretch of
street.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
September 8, 1997
Page -2-
Rick Eskeldson, 7220 West 48th Avenue, spoke in favor of speed bumps on 48th Avenue
John Kellow, 4740 Patiet Street, wanted to bring to Council's attention that the City is
dumping storm water in a ditch that belongs to the Bayou Ditch Company; City is not paying
their fair share
Jack Hurst, Chief of Police, read a statement regarding an article in the Jefferson Sentinel
with the headline "Victim's mom says police killed her son" Chief Hurst has personally
reviewed all the details of this case and held discussions with officers directly involved in this
case, he is satisfied that police response was appropriate, thorough and effective
Bob Middaugh stated that he has reviewed this matter with Chief Hurst and supports him
and Officer Berkowitz. This is absolute irresponsible journalism and he stands behind the
Chief and the department on this
LOCAL LIQUOR LICENSING AUTHORITY MATTERS
Item 1.
Modification of Premises for Applejack Liquors, Inc
Item 1 was introduced by Mr DiTullio, title and summary read by the Clerk.
James Shpall, applicant, was present to answer questions.
Motion by Mr DiTullio to approve the modification of premises for Applejack Assoc Inc., dba
"Applejack Liquors Inc.", 3320 Youngfield Street, Wheat Ridge, Colorado, and authorize the
Mayor and City Clerk to sign the application, seconded by Mr Solano, carried 7-0
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ORDINANCES ON SECOND READING
Item 2.
Council Bills No 32, 33, 34, 37, 27, 28, 38,31, 30, and 29, making
amendments to the City's Code of Laws regarding residential density and
density limitations and an amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan
corresponding to the various density changes made by the Council Bills
Item 2 was introduced by Mr DiTullio Motion by Mr DiTullio to suspend the Council Rules
for this item only and allow Councilmembers to speak more than twice, seconded by Mr
Solano, carried 6-1 with Mrs Worth voting no
Motion by Mr Siler to allow the Clerk to read three letters into the record, seconded by Mr
Solano, carried 7-0
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
September 8, 1997
Page -3-
City Clerk, Wanda Sang, read a letter from Wheat Ridge United Neighborhoods, Inc., which
was in favor of the Ordinances and asked that Council support their passage The second
letter was from Tom Shoup, who asked that 1 all the Ordinances be withdrawn, 2 all
property owners be notified by certified mail of zoning changes The third letter was from
Kathy Hass and Georgia Hass, who expressed their displeasure at the lack of proper
notification to property owners, they asked that Council include an amendment that excludes
existing duplex and multi-family units from the density requirements
Mr Middaugh and Mr Dahl explained the background and reason for these Ordinances
This is a legislative issue, not a zoning matter
The following speakers were sworn in by the Mayor'
Avis Cheryl Compton, 4630-40 Pierce Street, stated that she and her mother own a six-unit
property, that is zoned R-3, which is one of the two types of structures that were not
exempted in the first reading. If anything happened, she could probably only rebuild four of
these units, they are facing about 1/3 loss in the value of their property, they can't afford that.
Her other concern was insurance, how would that be covered? She also feels that
insufficient notice was given to homeowners
Ron Selstad, 23461 Morning Rose, Evergreen, made his comments as a Real Estate
Broker, appraiser, owner of Wheat Ridge rental property, and former Wheat Ridge
Councilmember The proposed changes affect 6-700 existing properties, no matter how you
phrase it, this is a rezoning process and you have given no notice to the owners of these
properties He asked that this be tabled indefinitely; he would support passage of Council
Bills 30 and 31
Harold Smethills, 15669 West Maple Drive, owns multi-family units in the City; does not
understand the animosity toward people who rent; most of us have been renters in our life, if
1/2 of the residents of Wheat Ridge are renters, have they been considered in this process?
Density is not Wheat Ridge's problem, it is the age of its housing; it is old and getting older
This proposal is misguided and unfair; the effect will be to deprive people of new, affordable
quality housing in Wheat Ridge and will take significant property value away from the very
people who have built so much of this City
Jack Squire, 3270 Allison Street, duplex owner, didn't receive notice until he got one of the
cards that the Realtors sent out; his property is a lifetime investment; feels that
grandfathering in existing properties is a must and anything less is unconstitutional
Harold Lofgren, 4655 Everett Street, duplex owner, feels they should be grandfathered in
He would like to be notified next time a change is proposed
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
September 8, 1997
Page -4-
Jimel Skaff, 4015 Ammons Street, duplex owner, asked to be grandfathered in
Tony Ficco, 12425 West 38th Avenue, is concerned about changing the square footage
allowed in the R-2 and R-3 of the remaining land that's left in the City 94% of the City is
already developed; this requirement is being aimed at a few people, because of the 6% of
the land that's available to be developed, doesn't state that it's zoned R-2 or R-3, it could be
A-1, 1-1, C-2, etc We are going at this like we are a new City Where does this leave a
property owner who has held his property for years and now he may be finally in a position
to develop it and he can't develop it.
Lou Ficco, 11315 West 38th Avenue, asked that Council take more time to look into this and
not rush into anything
Dan Boyce, 3433 Wadsworth Blvd., owns 1 acre with 3 houses on it; might want to develop
that into apartment houses at some point; asked that his property also be exempted.
Bob Fischer, 5055 West 33rd Avenue, owns 5-unit apartment in Wheat Ridge, wants R-3
exempted
Nancy Snow, 11155 West 40th Avenue, Chairperson of the Comprehensive Plan Committee,
gave background as to how they came to make the recommendations. This City has a really
strange zoning system, called pyramid zoning, the gripes are that you can have an
apartment building right next door to a single family neighborhood, if we don't do something,
people are going to tear down our many, many, small homes and put in apartments and
people don't want that. She encouraged Council to pass this tonight.
Boyd Adsit, 3245 Moore Street, President of Wheat Ridge Alliance for Progress, asked that
any further action be postponed until after specific notification of effected property owners
has been made and public hearings have been held. The Transcript has a very poor
circulation, it is published on Friday, he gets his the next Thursday
Deanna Leino, has owned property in Wheat Ridge for 30 years, would appreciate being
notified by mail if anything like this comes up, asked that exception be passed
Terry O'Neill, asked that this be postponed, but pass the exemptions so that property
owners are protected.
Nancy Werkmeister, 2996 Reed Street, homeowner in Wheat Ridge, spoke in favor of the
density plan, a lot of time, effort, thought, and communication has gone into this plan With
lower density you have more stability in your population, is in favor of grandfathering in
existing properties, asked that this plan be passed tonight.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
September 8, 1997
Page -5-
Dave Bandimere, invited anybody present to come to 32nd and Benton and look at the
quality of their apartments compared to the immediate neighborhood, the property has been
in his family since 1937
Rose Moore, owns property in Wheat Ridge, asked for exemption for R-3 zoning
Edgar Gregory, 6710-20 West 47th Avenue, owns property with his grandmother; had a lot
of questions that weren't answered, thinks this should be postponed
Roberta Thomas, 6595 West 32nd Avenue, has a hard time understanding the reasoning for
these changes, she hasn't seen much building going or, or much change, the people who
live in Wheat Ridge were either born here, or moved here for the unique quality of the City
She has R-3 property; was given no notification, please rethink this
Gail Vichiola, 6601 West 32nd Avenue, doesn't understand the need for these Ordinances,
only understands the need for grandfathering
Andrew Loushin, 4635 and 4610 Field Street property owner, (doesn't live in Wheat Ridge)
wished they had bought their property elsewhere after hearing about these Ordinances,
would appreciate the R-3's being grandfathered in
Catherine Dunlop, 7160 West 30th Avenue, stated that the City of Wheat Ridge does not
have the funds to notify everyone about every issue, people have a responsibility to keep
informed about issues they are concerned about; meetings have been held by the
Comprehensive Plan Committee with each District; Planning Commission held public
meetings and Council had public input at the first reading Comprehensive Plan has been
developed with input from a lot of citizens all over the City of Wheat Ridge, people are
concerned about unrestricted growth, increasing density and protecting the character of their
neighborhoods City has the right and a responsibility to provide guidelines for future
development of the City The previous guidelines are very old She urged Council to pass
these Ordinances
Margaret Parry, 3060 Teller Street, her family owns several duplexes and a fourplex in
Wheat Ridge, spoke in favor of the density ordinances
Martin Borose, 7200 West 31 st Place, firmly supports this particular Comprehensive Plan,
wants to have a residential area without a multi-family unit sitting square in the middle of it.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
September 8, 1997
Page -6-
Louise Turner, 11256 West 38th Avenue, is a firm supporter of low density and has watched
for 28 years as the low density districts in Wheat Ridge have been whittled away by
rezonings, however, there is a basic flaw among the ordinances in this group which violate
the longstanding assumption and belief that we have a right to rely on our zoning; our rights
in any zone district are clearly spelled out in the zoning law and she doesn't care if it's her
right to have a horse, or her neighbors right to put a given number of units on a given sized
lot; if it is spelled out in the existing zoning, it is a use by right. Asked that Council make a
commitment not to take low density land and rezone it for high density development.
Motion by Mrs Worth to go past 11 00 P m and finish this Item and Item 6 and continue the
rest of the Agenda to next Monday, September 15, 1997 at 6'00 pm and continue until we
finish our Agenda at that time, seconded by Mr Solano, carried 7-0
Kim Stewart, 11700 West 46th Avenue, owns and occupies along with her mother a duplex
there, was very happy when moratorium occurred, grandfathering in existing property is
important; supports what the Council has done, asked that all current existing things be
grandfathered, including those properties that are currently zoned to be built upon.
Diane Simmons, 7160 West 29th Place, voiced her support for the proposed density
ordinances because they provide a proper and fair means of assuring that Wheat Ridge will
retain the quiet, safe, country atmosphere which attracted us all here in the first place, this
will protect our City from becoming just another victim of uncontrolled urban sprawl, urged
Council to pass the Ordinances
Jerry Roach, 7805 West 41 st Avenue, was concerned about people in a single family home
on R-2 property that eventually wanted to build a duplex and couldn't do it under the new
Ordinance He feels this constitutes downzoning by Ordinance
Roger Loecher, 4599 Carr Street, people are happy with their zonings, they don't want to
change and face the uncertainty of what can happen
Sandy Collins, 3415 Teller Street, duplex owner, applauded Council and staff for moving
density ordinances forward, this will protect the integrity of neighborhoods for all residents,
plenty of notice was given by the City
Tom Slattery, 6869 West 32nd Avenue, Vice Chairperson of the Comprehensive Plan
Review Committee, clarified some issues that have come up tonight. He disagreed with the
Committee to increase the lot area for duplexes, feels the 12,500 square foot requirement is
plenty
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
September 8, 1997
Page -7-
Ron Patera, member of the Comprehensive Plan Review Committee, explained how they
based their decisions and recommendations on input from citizens who attended the public
meetings What Council has in their hands tonight reflects the sentiments and concerns of
the community He also recommended that Council grandfather the existing structures He
believes in the 15,000 square foot requirement for duplexes
Susan Seeds, 6147 West 35th Avenue, asked that Council pass their decision on quality of
life for all Wheat Ridge citizens rather than money; asked that these Ordinances be passed
with the appropriate amendments
Jim Hamburger, 5509 West 26th Avenue, owns R-3 property; doesn't think it's fair to
devalue people's property; quality of life here hasn't changed, he is angry about it.
LaVonne Holden, 3321 Yarrow Street, duplex owner, feels the current lot size for duplexes
is more than adequate, we don't need 15,000
A. Council Bill 32 - An Ordinance concerning residential density limitations upon two-
family dwelling units in the R-2 District.
Motion by Mr DiTullio for approval of Council Bill 32 (Ordinance 1087), I further move to
delete the words (2) redevelopment of a property where reconstruction of a structure is only
part of such redevelopment; seconded by Mrs Shaver
Motion by Mr Siler to amend the Council Bill to change the 15,000 square feet back to the
12,500; seconded by Mr Solano; failed 2-5 with Councilmembers Siler and Solano voting
yes
Motion by Mr Solano to amend the Council Bill to exempt existing R-2 property owners that
do not have an existing structure from this, seconded by Mr Siler; failed 2-5 with
Councilmembers Solano and Siler voting yes
Original Motion carried 6-1 with M r Siler voting no
B Council Bill 33 - An Ordinance concerning residential density limitations upon two-
family dwelling units in the R-2A District.
Motion by Mr DiTullio for approval of Council Bill 33 (Ordinance 1088), I further move to
delete the words (2) redevelopment of a property where reconstruction of a structure is only
part of such redevelopment; seconded by Mrs Worth
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
September 8, 1997
Page -8-
Motion by Mr Solano to amend the Council Bill to exempt existing R-2 A property owners
that do not have an existing structure from this, seconded by Mr Siler' failed 2-5 with
Councilmembers Solano and Siler voting yes.
Original Motion carried 6-1 with Mr Siler voting no
C Council Bill 34 - An Ordinance concerning residential density limitations upon multi-
family dwelling units in the R-2A District.
Motion by Mr DiTullio for approval of Council Bill 34 (Ordinance 1089), I further move to
delete the words (2) redevelopment of a property where reconstruction of a structure is only
part of such redevelopment; seconded by Mrs Worth
Motion by Mr Solano to amend the Council Bill to exempt existing R-2 A property owners
that do not have an existing structure from this, seconded by Mr Siler; failed 2-5 with
Councilmembers Solano, and Siler voting yes
Original Motion carried 6-1 with Mr Siler voting no
D Council Bill 37 - An Ordinance concerning residential density limitations upon multi-
family dwelling units in the R-3 District.
Motion by Mr DiTullio for approval of Council Bill 37 (Ordinance 1090), seconded by Mrs
Shaver
Mrs. Shaver asked for a friendly amendment to add the grandfathering clause to this Council
Bill This was accepted
Motion by Mr Siler for an amendment to grandfather in current property owners to be able to
develop land that they presently own, seconded by Mr Solano, failed 2-5 with Mr Solano
and Mr Siler voting yes
Original Motion carried 6-1 with Mr Siler voting no
E Council Bill 27 - An Ordinance concerning residential density limitations upon
multifamily dwelling units in the R-3A District.
Motion by Mr DiTullio for approval of Council Bill 27 (Ordinance 1091), I further move to
delete the words (2) redevelopment of a property where reconstruction of a structure is only
part of such redevelopment; seconded by Mrs Fields
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
September 8, 1997
Page -9-
Motion by Mr Solano to amend the Council Bill to exempt existing R-3 A property owners
that do not have an existing structure from this, seconded by Mr Siler; failed 2-5 with
Councilmembers Solano, and Siler voting yes.
Original Motion carried 6-1 with Mr Siler voting no
F Council Bill 28 - An Ordinance concerning residential density limitations in Planned
Residential Developments in the PRD District.
Motion by Mr DiTullio for approval of Council Bill 28 (Ordinance 1092), seconded by Mrs
Shaver
Mrs Shaver asked for a friendly amendment to add the grandfathering clause to this Council
Bill The grandfather clause will be a new subsection (I) which reads the requirements of
this subsection 26-25(IV)(B)(1) shall not apply to impose a density requirement of less than
twenty-one units per acre, with respect to the reconstruction of residential dwellinqs in the
PRD district, where such structures and their reconstruction meet all of the following
requirements....."This was accepted
Motion carried 6-1 with Mr Siler voting no
G Council Bill 38 - An Ordinance concerning residential density limitations in the PCD
District.
Motion by Mr DiTullio for approval of Council Bill 38 (Ordinance 1093), seconded by Mrs
Dalbec; carried 6-1 with Mr Siler voting no
H Council Bill 31 - An Ordinance amending Section 26-30(c)(4)(d) of the Wheat Ridge
Code of Laws, concerning Planned Building Groups
Motion by Mr DiTullio for approval of Council Bill 31 (Ordinance 1094), seconded by Mrs
Fields, carried 7-0
Council Bill 30 - An Ordinance amending Section 26-30(D) of the Wheat Ridge Code
of Laws concerning Consolidation Plats
Motion by Mr DiTullio for approval of Council Bill 30 (Ordinance 1095), seconded by Mrs
Fields, carried 7-0
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
September 8, 1997
Page -10-
J Council Bill 29 - An Ordinance amending Section 26-25(IV)(B)( 1) of the Wheat Ridge
Code of Laws, concerning site development requirements for Planned Residential
Developments
Motion by Mrs. Dalbec to postpone Council Bill 29 indefinitely until a revision has been
brought forward until hearings have been held by the Comprehensive Plan Review
Committee and Planning Commission, seconded by Mr Siler
Motion by Mr Solano to amend the motion to postpone this to September 22, 1997,
seconded by Mrs Worth. Mrs Shaver asked that the changes be published in the
newspaper Mr Solano and second accepted this as a friendly amendment; carried 5-2 with
Mr Siler and Mrs Dalbec voting no
K. Motion amending the Comprehensive Plan of development adopting a text change for
residential land uses
Motion by Mr DiTullio that the text in the Comprehensive Plan describing residential land use
be amended to read as follows. Residential. ThIS category includes all structures or
establishments for permanent residence, including private household umts, both owner and
renter occupied, grouped according to the number of family units In the residence; group
quarters or residential institutIOns for permanent, non-family occupancy in which lodging
accommodations are provided WIth or without meals; mobile home parks of a permanent
nature.
A. Agricultural estate, one unit per acre.
B. rural estate residential, a minimum of one-half unit per acre.
C. Single family residential, one-five units per acre.
D Single family residential, six-mne units per acre.
E. Single family/duplex resIdential, four-seven umts per acre.
F Multi-family residential, ten-twelve units per acre.
G Apartments and condominiums, a maximum sixteen units per acre.
seconded by Mrs Worth; carried 6-1 with Mr Siler voting no
L. Motion to amend the Comprehensive Plan by adopting a new interim residential land
use map
Motion by Mr DiTullio that the interim future residential land use map, dated August 20,
1997, illustrating interim residential land use categories for the Comprehensive Plan of
Development of the City of Wheat Ridge be approved, seconded by Mrs Worth, carried 7-0
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
September 8, 1997
Page -11-
Mayor Wilde stated that he will veto Items ABC D E F and G, he will provide a letter
Item 6.
Resolution 1623 - referring a ballot question to the voters of the City at the
November 4, 1997, General Municipal Election, concerning revenue in excess
of constitutional limitations received in the fiscal year ending December 31,
1996
Resolution 1623 was introduced by Mrs Worth, title read by the Clerk.
Motion by Mrs Worth for approval of Resolution 1623, seconded by Mr Solano
Motion by Mr Solano to amend to add "or the Teen Center", seconded by Mr DiTullio,
carried 7-0
Original Motion as amended carried 6-1 with Mrs Dalbec voting no
Meeting adjourned at 12 12 a.m.
September 15,1997 - Continued Meeting from September 8,1997
Mayor Wilde called the continued meeting to order at 6'00 p.m Councilmembers present:
Teri Dalbec (arrived at 6'05 pm), Jerry DiTullio, Don Eafanti, Jean Fields, Janelle Shaver,
Ken Siler (arrived at 609 pm), Tony Solano, and Claudia Worth Also present: City Clerk,
Wanda Sang, City Treasurer, Jim Malone, Acting City Manager, Bob Goebel, City Attorney,
Gerald Dahl, Director of Parks, Gary Wardle, staff; and interested citizens
Item 3.
Council Bill 39 - An Ordinance providing for the approval of rezoning from
Commercial-One to Planned Industrial Development District and for approval of
an Outline Development Plan on land located at 9500 West 49th Avenue, City
of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado
(Case No WZ-97-10) (Pacifica Holding Company LLC)
Council Bill 39 was introduced on second reading by Mrs Worth, title read by the Clerk;
Ordinance No 1096 assigned
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
September 8, 1997
Page -12-
Mike Kendall, representing Pacifica Holding Company, gave summary of the project.
Motion by Mrs Dalbec to suspend the Rules and allow Council more than two times to
speak; seconded by Mrs Shaver; failed 4-4 with Councilmembers Worth, Eafanti, Shaver,
and Dalbec voting yes (This needed 6 votes to pass)
Meredith Reckert was sworn in by the Mayor and presented the staff report and showed
slides of the property
Motion by Mrs Worth that Council Bill 39 (Ordinance 1096), a request for approval of
rezoning from Commercial-One to Planned Industrial Development and for approval of an
outline development plan for property located at 9500 West 49th Avenue, be approved for
the following reasons 1 A rezoning is required to expand allowed uses 2 There are
some light industrial uses which are appropriate for the area if performance standards are
used 3 All requirements for a PID outline development plan have been met. With the
following conditions 1 Semi-trucks and trailers be allowed on the property for pickup and
deliveries only 1 A. All semi-tractors may not be parked no more than one hour before
loading or unloading or one hour after loading or unloading 1 B No overnight parking will
be allowed of semi-trucks. 2 No shift work be allowed between the hours of 10'00 P m
and 6 00 a.m 3 The two eastern buildings be limited to a 5 HP maximum for anyone
machine 4 The two western buildings be limited to a 40 HP maximum for anyone
machine 5 No attachment of additional equipment such as special equipment, cranes, lifts,
etc., to outside walls will be permitted and no attachments such as cranes or lifts be allowed
on the roof 6 Item #9 on the outline plan be eliminated from Buildings 'A' and 'B' 7
Include the idling section in the diesel emissions ordinance
Seconded by Mrs Dalbec; carried 7-1 with Mrs Dalbec voting no
Motion by Mrs Worth that the request for approval of a final development plan for property
located at 9500 West 49th Avenue, be approved for the following reasons 1 All maximum
requirements of the zoning code have been met. 2 All requirements for a PID final
development plan have been met. With the following conditions 1 If the variance is
approved, the plan be revised accordingly 2 No other freestanding signs be allowed on the
property; seconded by Mr Solano, carried 7-1 with Mrs Dalbec voting no
Motion by Mrs Worth that the request for a five-foot sign setback variance for property
located at 9500 West 49th Avenue be approved for the following reasons 1 Approval of
the reduced request wold not prove a hazard to the public health, safety and welfare 2 It
would not have a negative impact on property values or the public welfare 3 Proposed
location is more aesthetically pleasing than other locations meeting setbacks
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
September 8, 1997
Page -13-
With the following conditions 1 A building permit be applied for and issued prior to the
existing sign being completed. 2 No other freestanding signs be allowed on the property;
seconded by Mr Solano
Motion by Mrs Worth to amend her motion to have condition 2 read: No other freestanding
signs be allowed on the property with the exception of tenant identification signs not to
exceed 10ft in height nor 50 square feet; seconded by Mrs Dalbec; failed 3-5 with
Councilmembers Shaver, Worth and Dalbec voting yes
Vote on original motion carried 7-1 with Mr DiTullio voting no
ORDINANCES ON FIRST READING
Item 4.
Council Bill 45 - An Ordinance establishing the salary for the elected positions
of Mayor, members of Council, City Clerk, and City Treasurer, of the City of
Wheat Ridge, during the term of office commencing November 10, 1997 and
repealing Ordinance 1009, Series of 1995
Council Bill 45 was introduced on first reading by Mr Solano, title read by the Clerk.
Motion by Mr Solano that Council Bill 45 be approved on first reading, ordered published,
public hearing be set for Monday, October 13, 1997, at 7'00 pm in City Council Chambers,
Municipal Building, and if approved on second reading, take effect 15 days after final
publication, that as an additional provision the staff be directed to prepare a chart to address
salaries for the four-year terms, seconded by Mrs Dalbec; carried 6-2 with Councilmembers
Siler and DiTullio voting no
DECISIONS. RESOLUTIONS. AND MOTIONS
Item 5.
West 48th Avenue Neighborhood Traffic Management Project approval
Item 5 was introduced by Mr Siler; title and summary read by the Clerk. Mr Solano passed
out a neighborhood petition in favor of six speed humps that had been given to him
Bob Goebel presented the staff report.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
September 8, 1997
Page -14-
The following speakers were called by the Mayor'
John B Beall, 7221 West 48th Avenue, spoke in favor of action on 48th Avenue to curtail
the speeding and on any other street in Wheat Ridge, he is opposed to speed bumps or
humps, feels 1) they may be illegal, 2) many traffic engineers consider speed bumps/humps
ineffective in changing driving habits, 3) expense The only widely recommended speed
control is surveillance and enforcement.
Harry Taylor, 7350 West 48th Avenue, is in favor of all six of the speed humps
James Swenson, 6790 West 48th Avenue, added an additional name to the petition for six
speed humps He is also in favor of all six speed humps.
Scott Read, 7180 West 48th Avenue, urged that Council vote in favor of the six speed
humps.
Lisa Marcellus, 7390 West 48th Avenue, spoke in favor of the six speed humps
Motion by Mr Siler that the City construct five speed humps, as identified in the concept
mitigation plan, on West 48th Avenue between Upham Street and Otis Street. I further move
that the City construct an additional speed hump on West 48th Avenue near West 48th
Circle I further move that all costs associated with this work be paid from Acct. No 30-304-
800-843 and that these funds be encumbered for the length of the work in accordance with
Ordinance 3787, 1989 series, seconded by Mr Solano, carried 8-0
Item 7.
Bid Award for Miscellaneous Remodel Project (RFQ #007-97)
Mr Solano left to attend a neighborhood traffic meeting.
Motion by Mrs Worth that the Miscellaneous Remodel Project be awarded to RMA Group in
the amount of their quote of $2,352 00 for the Police Briefing Room and the Under Stairs
Storage I further move that the City Manager's Office for $6,886 00 be postponed until the
first regular meeting in December All costs be charged to the following accounts Building
Fund Acct. No 60-201-802 and Capital Improvement Fund Acct. No 30-610-811 I further
move that the funds be encumbered for the length of the Project which expressly allows the
expenditure of funds in 1998 for this Project in accordance with Ordinance #787, 1989
Series, seconded by Mr Eafanti, carried 7-0
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
September 8, 1997
Page -15-
Item 8.
Approval of Expenditure Items.
Motion by Mrs Worth that the attached purchases be approved in the amounts indicated and
that all costs be charged to the account shown on the purchase order report; seconded by
Mr DiTullio, carried 7-0
Item 9.
CONSENT AGENDA
A. Bid Award for Telephone Equipment & Installation (RFP #97-004)
B Bid Award for chemical fertilizer (Mapo bid #007-96)
Motion by Mrs Worth for approval of the Consent Agenda, seconded by Mr DiTullio, carried
7-0
CITY MANAGER'S MATTERS (Bob Goebel sitting in for Mr Middaugh)
Consensus was to hold budget meetings on October 7, 9, 16, 1997
Consensus was to hold the Boards and Commissions Dinner at Heritage Square to see
"Hunchback of Notre Dame" Outgoing Commissioners will be given a plaque for their
services on that night.
Mr Middaugh faxed everybody a pro statement on the Rec Center and wondered if anybody
on Council had amendments on that. Mrs Dalbec would like to talk to Mr Middaugh about
adding an explanation as to land costs and road and bridge construction to fully explain the
17 Million Consensus was that Teri Dalbec work with the City Administrator on that.
Mr Goebel stated that he, Mr Middaugh, Mr Hurst, and the Fire Chief will attend a meeting
in Maryland on September 28 - October 3, hosted by FEMA, where they will learn about
emergency procedures
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
September 8, 1997
Page -16-
Motion by Mrs Worth to adjourn the Regular Meeting and have Councilmembers Matters
after the Study Session, seconded by Mrs Shaver; carried 6-1 with Mr Solano voting no
Meeting adjourned at 8 45 P m
- I
APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON SEPTEMBER 22,1997 BY A VOTE OF 8 TO 0
- -
I _
.', ~, ~.
... , . (--.. I ~. '-. ~ (\_, (I . .~
Ctau'dia Worth, Council President