HomeMy WebLinkAboutRes WA-03-10
ORIGINAL
CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTION
I, Ann Lazzeri, Secretary to the City of Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment, do hereby certify that
the following Resolution was duIy adopted in the City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson,
State of Colorado, on the 22nd day of Mav. 2003.
CASE NO: WA-03-10
APPLICANT'S NAME: David and Marilyn Roll
LOCATION: 4676 Upham Street
WHEREAS, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and
WHEREAS, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. W A-03-10 is an appeal to this Board
from the decision of an administrative officer; and
WHEREAS, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law, and in recognition
that there were no protests registered against it; and
WHEREAS, the relief applied for MAY be granted without detriment to the public welfare and
without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing the City of
Wheat Ridge.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that Board of Adjustment Application Case No. W A-03-
lObe, and hereby is, APPROVED.
TYPE OF VARIANCE: A5-foot side yard setback variance from the 5-foot side yard setback
requirement resuIting in a O-foot side yard setback and a I-foot side yard setback variance from
the 5-foot side yard setback requirement resuIting in a 4-foot side yard setback for the purpose of
locating a storage shed on property zoned Residential-Two (R-2) and located at 4676 Upham
Street.
FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
1. Granting of the request would not alter the essential character of the locality.
2. The majority of the Board finds that a hardship occurs related to the intent ofthe
ordinance in that the lot is substandard to lot size and lot width requirements of the R-2
zone district.
3. The applicant is limited in alternative placements due to existing structural improvements
and mature landscaping.
4. The request will not impair adequate supply of light and air to neighboring properties.
Board of Adjustment
Resolution WA-03-10
Page two (2)
5. Granting of the request will not increase congestion in the public streets nor increase fire
danger to adjacent properties.
6. Letters in favor of the proposed variance have been submitted by neighbors inmtediately
adjacent.
8. The requested side yard setback of the storage structure will be an improvement from the
existing 2- foot setback ofthe existing storage structure.
7. Although no precedent, in the legal sense of the word, has been established, according to
the city's land use atlas there have been other side yard setback variances granted in the
vicinity over the years.
VOTE:
YES:
ABSENT:
ABBOTT, BLAIR, DRDA, HOVLAND, HOWARD, SCHULZ
ECHELMEYER, ROLLINS
DISPOSITION: A request for a 5-foot side yard setback variance from the 5-foot side yard
setback requirement resulting in a 0- foot side yard setback and a I-foot side yard setback
variance from the 5-foot side yard setback requirement resulting in a 4-foot side yard setback for
the purpose oflocating a storage shed on property zoned Residential-Two and located at 4676
Upham Street was APPROVED.
ADOPTED and made effective this 22nd day of Mav.2003.
Bt4
Pall ,aIr
Board of Adjustment
~~~A;
Ann Lazzeri, Secre ry
Board of Adjustment