HomeMy WebLinkAboutRes WA-95-2
CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTION
I, Mary Lou Chapla, Secretary to the City of Wheat Ridge Boazd of Adjustment, do hereby
certify that the following Resolution was duly adopted in the City of Wheat Ridge, County of
Jefferson, State of Colorado, on the 23rd day of February , 1995.
CASE NO: WA-95-2
APPLICANT'S NAME: Army B. Coury
LOCATION: 10088 W. 32nd Avenue
Upon motion by Boazd Member ABBOTT ,seconded by Board Member
ROSSILLON the following Resolution was stated.
WHEREAS, the applicant was denied permission by an Administrative Officer; and
WHEREAS, Board of Adjustment Application, Case No. WA-95-2
is an appeal to this Board from the decision of an Administrative Officer; and
WHEREAS, the property has been posted the required 15 days by law and there WERE NO
protests registered against it; and
WHEREAS, the relief applied for MAY be granted without detriment to the public welfaze
and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing the
City of Wheat Ridge.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Boazd of Adjustment Application Case
No. WA-95-2 , be and hereby is APPROVED.
TYPE OF VARIANCE: A 14' sideyazd setback & a 4' rearyazd setback in a Residential-
One zone district
PURPOSE: To allow construction of a shed
FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
1. There is an existing metal shed at the proposed location at the southeast comer of
the lot.
2. The plight of the owner could be considered unique as there are existing mature
trees on the lot which greatly restrict the owner's options as to alternative
locations.
3. The granting of this variance could negatively affect the residents to the south as
the shed will be visible from their backyazd. However, it would appear that they
have no objections since they signed the petition of support.
CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTION
CASE NO. WA-95-2/Page 2
4. The granting of the variance should not impair the amount of light and air to the
homes the south and east substantially more than the existing shed. The granting of the
variance does not increase-the fire danger to the structure.
5. All four adjacent property owners signed the petition registering their approval of
the requested vaziances.
WTTH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. The variance is granted only for the placement of the shed for the size and
location of the application and testimony.
2. The replacement structure may not be constructed of metal.
VOTE: YES: Abbott, Howazd, Junker, Rossillon and Walker
NO: None
DISPOSITION: A 14' sideyard setback variance and a 4' rearyard setback variance
granted by a vote of 5-0.
DATED this 23rd day of February, 1995.
'~
SUSAN JU Chairman Mary Lbu Chapla, Secretary
Board of Adjustment Board of Adjustment