HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/27/2005
-
-
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
Municipal Building
7500 W. 29th Avenue
Friday, May 27, 2005
Mayor Cerveny called the meeting to order at 12:32 p.m.; City Council members present:
Karen Berry, Jerry DiTullio, Wanda Sang, Dean Gokey, Mike Stites, Larry Schulz, Lena
Rotola, Karen Adams was absent due to family matters; Also present: Deputy City Manager
Patrick Goff; City Attorney Gerald Dahl; City Clerk Pam Anderson; Director of Community
Development Alan White
Item 1. Discuss pending litigation for inclusion within the Prospect Recreation and Park
District of certain real property located within the City.
City Attorney Gerald Dahl briefed City Council on the agenda item regarding the inclusion
lawsuit brought by Prospect Valley Recreation and Park District to include property that has
been annexed into the City into the recreation district.
Motion by Mr. DiTullio to go into executive session for a conference with the City Attorney
under Charter Section 5.7 (b)(1) and Section 24-6-402 (4) (b), C.R.S., specifically concerning
litigation brought to include certain property into the Prospect Park and Recreation District. I
further move to return to the open meeting at the close of the executive session for the
purpose of taking any formal action deemed necessary; seconded by Mrs. Sang; carried 7-0.
Adjourned to executive session at 12:34 p.m.
Meeting reconvened at 1 :27 p.m.
Motion by Mr. Gokey to approve the filing by the City of the motion to intervene and
oppose the inclusion within the Prospect Valley Recreation and Park District of property
annexed in connection with the Coors/ Cabela's annexation and further to direct its staff
and attorneys to bring forward the products of any negotiations between the District and
the property owners in that area with a view to allowing the City to continue and foster
discussions between those property owners reserving to the City the right to determine
whether it will continue its opposition of the inclusion or not; seconded by Mr. Schulz;
Mrs. Sang would like it known for the record that we have been assured that we have
other options in the future. Mr. Dahl stated that this motion does not foreclose the ability
of the City to aggressively oppose the inclusion or withdraw is opposition. It allows the City to
CITY COUNCIL SPECDa MEETING MINUTES: May 27,2005
2
remain in the case while the parties continue to talk about the ways in which the District
could be involved.
Motion carried 6-1, with Ms. Berry voting no.
Meeting adjourned at 1 :32 p.m.
APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON June 13, 200sElY A VOTE OF -L to---..lL...