Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/23/2000 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Minutes of Meeting March 23, 2000 ORIGINAL 1. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by Chair HOWARD at 7:30 p.m. on March 3,2000 in the Conncil Chambers of the Mnnicipal Building, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. 2. ROLL CALL Alan White introduced Jerry Montoya as the new Board of Adjustment member representing District III. Members Present: Michelle Brown Bill Echelmeyer Bob Howard Paul Hovland Linda Mauro Jerry Montoya Members Absent: Tom Abbott Staff Present: Alan White, Planning Director Mary Austin, Plarmer Gerald Dahl, City Attorney Ann Lazzeri, Secretary The following is the official set of Board of Adjustment minutes for the Public Hearing of March 23,2000. A set of these minutes is retained both in the office of the City Clerk and in the Department of Plarming and Development of the City of Wheat Ridge. 3. APPROVE THE ORDER OF THE AGENDA It was moved by Board Member MAURO and seconded by Board Member MONTOYA to approve the order ofthe agenda. The motion carried 6-0 with Board Member ABBOTT absent. 4. PUBLIC FORUM (This is the time for anyone to speak on any subject not appearing on the agenda.) There was no one signed up to speak. 5. PUBLIC HEARING A. Case No. TUP-OO-01: (continuedfrom February 24,2000) An application filed by BGT Enterprises for approval ofa temporary use permit to maintain existing storage ofRV's at 10165 West 49th Avenue (Lot 3) and to allow commercial vehicle display and storage at 10145 West 49th Avenue (Lot I) without lot improvements. Said properties are zoned Commercial-One. This case was presented by Alan White. He reviewed the staff report, ~resented slides rn:d overheads ofthe subject property and entered all pertinent documents mto the record which were accepted by Chair HOWARD. He advised that all notification and posting requirements had been met and there was jurisdiction for the Board to hear the ~ase. He answered the five criteria used in evaluating a request for a temporary use permit. Staff recommended denial of the application for reasons outlined in the staff report. Board Member ECHELMEYER expressed concern that there has been a temporary use on this site since 1987. Mr. White stated that staff shared that concern as well as the concern that no outside storage, other than the allowed RV storage, should occur in this area. In answer to a question from Chair HOWARD, Mr. White stated that the applicant has not been operating without a TUP since 1986, although there have been several TUP's granted over this period of time. Terry Oman 8305 S. Wadsworth, Littleton Mr. Oman, the applicant, was sworn in by Chair HOWARD. He stated he purchased the property four and a half years and has spent considerable funds to improve the property. He noted that the overhead was taken at the time he bought the property and therefore does not show the improvements. At the time of purchase, the entire area was RV storage. Since that time the property was divided in to five lots, three of which have been sold to and developed by Foothills Bank, Burger King and Amoco Oil. RV storage is now confined to a portion of the two remaining lots which are being marketed. He has also begnn road improvements which will be completed upon the sale of those lots. He would like to keep the RV storage and U-Haul business for cash flow nntil the lots are sold. He stated that it is not his intent to keep renewing the TUP. He would rather have the U-Hauls on the triangular portion of the property rather than placing all RV's in that area with screening. He would like to display eight vehicles in the subject area which is visible from the street. Other U -Haul vehicles would be placed north of his office which would not be visible from the street. He commented that this is the third time the U-Haullocation has been changed but the first time it has become a problem. In response to a question from Board Member MAURO, Mr. Oman stated that he intends to keep gravel in the area where the U-Hauls are displayed. Board Member MONTOYA asked if the applicant had the right to store RV's in the area where the U-Haul vehicles are presently displayed. Mr. White replied there is no evidence that RV storage would not be permitted in the area. Alan White read into the record a memo dated January II, 2000 to Meredith Reckert, Senior Plarmer from Martin Orner, Economic Development Specialist. Chair HOWARD asked if anyone wished to speak to this matter. There was no response and no one had signed the public hearing roster. Board of Adjustmenl Minutes Page 2 03/23-00 Board Member MONTOYA asked ifhe should vote on this matter since it was continued from the February meeting beforehe was a member ofthe Board. Chair HO:" ARD advised that he could vote because the matter was not discussed at the February meetmg. Upon a motion by Board Member HOVLAND and second by Board Member the following resolution was stated: Whereas, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and Whereas, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. TUP-OO-Ol is an appeal to this Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and Whereas, the property has been posted the required fifteen days by law and there were no protests registered against it; and Whereas, the relief applied for may be granted without detriment to the public welfare and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge. Now, therefore, be it resolved that Board of Adjustment Application Case No. TUP-OO- 01 be and hereby is APPROVED. Type of Variance: Temporary Use Permit to allow for rental ofU-Hauls on the portion of property known as Lot No.4. For the following reasons: 1. The Board finds that based on the evidence presented and based on the Board's conclusions relative to the five specific questions to justify the temporary use permit, the evidence and facts in this case do support the granting of this request. With the following conditions: 1. The Temporary Use Permit is not to exceed one year or until the property is sold. 2. The area for displaying the U-Haul vehicles would not hold more than eight (8) vehicles, including trucks and trailers; and the portion for viewing will be limited to approximately sixty (60) feet heading east from Street A and approximately forty (40) feet heading south from Street B, creating an approximate triangle in that area. Board of Adjustment Minutes 03123-00 Page 3 Board Member MAURO offered an amendment to add a third c.ondition whic~ would require four to six inches of gravel to be placed in the U-Haul display area which would extend to the curb. This amendment was accepted by Board Member HOVLAND. The motion died for lack of a second. Upon a motion by Board Member ECHELMEYER, the following resolution was stated: Whereas, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and Whereas, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. TUP-OO-Ol is an appeal to this Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and Whereas, the property has been posted the required fifteen days by law and there were no protests registered against it; and Whereas, the relief applied for may not be granted without detriment to the public welfare and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge. Now, therefore, be it resolved that Board of Adjustment Application Case No. TUP-OO- 01 be and hereby is DENIED. Type of Variance: Temporary Use Permit to allow for rental ofU-Hauls on the portion of property known as Lot No.4. For the following reasons: 1. The Board concurs with the staff's conclusions and the Economic Development Specialist's conclusion that this property, if given a Temporary Use Permit for a year, would present a traffic hazard to the area; it would have a blighting effect on the area, which is blighted to a degree now; and it would be detrimental to the program that the City Council has outlined, even to the point of asking for contributions to improve this particular site area for the betterment of the community. The motion died for lack of a second. Upon a motion by Board Member MAURO and second by Board Member BROWN, the following resolution was stated: Whereas, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and Whereas, Board of Adjustment Application Case No. TUP-OO-Ol is an appeal to this Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and Board of Adjustment Minutes 03123-00 Page 4 Whereas, the property has been posted the required fifteen days by law and there were no protests registered against it; and Whereas, the relief applied for may be granted without detriment to t~e public w~lfare and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of regulatIOns governIng the City of Wheat Ridge. Now, therefore, be it resolved that Board of Adjustment Application Case No. TUP-OO- 01 be and hereby is APPROVED. Type of Variance: Temporary Use Permit to allow for rental ofU-Hauls on the portion of property known as Lot No.4. For the following reasons: 1. The Board finds that based on the evidence presented and based on the Board's conclusions relative to the five specific questions to justify the temporary use permit, the evidence and facts in this case do support the granting of this request. With the following conditions: 1. The Temporary Use Permit is not to exceed one year or until the property is sold. 2. The area for displaying the U-Haul vehicles would not hold more than eight (8) vehicles, including trucks and trailers; and the portion for viewing will be limited to approximately sixty (60) feet heading east from Street A and approximately forty (40) feet heading south from Street B, creating an approximate triangle in that area. 3. Four to six inches of gravel will be placed in the U-Haul display area and the gravel will extend to the curb. The motion failed by a vote of 3-3 with Board Members MONTOYA, HOWARD and ECHELMEYER voting opposed, and Board Member ABBOTT absent. B. Case No. WA-00-02: (continuedfrom February 24,2000) An application filed by Trailer Source, Inc. for an interpretation of allowed uses as listed in their Plarmed Commercial Development (Tabor Development Plarmed Commercial Development Outline Development Plan.) Said property is located at 4651 Tabor Street and zoned PCD. This case was presented by Alan White. He reviewed the staff report, presented overheads of the subject property and entered all pertinent documents into the record which were accepted by Chair HOWARD. He advised that all notification and posting requirements had been met and there was jurisdiction for the Board to hear the case. Staff recommended Board of Adjustment Minutes Page 5 03123-00 denial of the application for reasons outlined in the staff report. He entered a letter dated March 14,2000 from Kenneth G. Brengle, Jr., President of the West Chamber indicating his support for the applicant's request. The letter was made a part ofthe case file. Board Member BROWN asked the staffs reason for the opinion that the sale of all-terrain vehicles (ATV's) and snowmobiles should not be allowed. Mr. White explained staffs interpretation is that there is nothing similar to ATV's or snowmobiles in the list of permitted uses for this development. Mr. White requested that staff be given the opportunity for a closing statement before a motion is considered. Dick Scheurer 143 Union Boulevard, Suite 625, Lakewood Mr. Scheurer stated there is ample evidence to support the finding that sales of ATV's and snowmobiles are in the scope of the Plarmed Development approved by Council in 1995 lll1der the similar use provision. James R. Blumenthal 5395 Easley Road, Golden Mr. Blumenthal was sworn in by Chair HOWARD. He presented slides and a history of his business which was started primarily for sales of horse trailers. Because there was a demand for A TV's, these were added to the inventory line in 1997. The reason for selling the snowmobiles and jet skis is that, in order to carry the Articat brand of ATV's, the Articat dealership requires three lines to be carried (ATV's, snowmobiles and jet skis.) He pointed out sales tax payments to the city have increased from approximately $4,000 in 1997 to approximately $40,000 in 1999. He stated that when the additional!.3 acres was added to the property and taken to City COlll1cil, the City COlll1cil voted against the sale of ATV's and snowmobiles and ordered the city to take action against Trailer Source. He commented that these types of sales have taken place since 1997 and the city never indicated they couldn't do so until the matter went before City COlll1cil. He stated that customers are allowed to drive an A TV around the property; however testing facilities are located off-site. Since marketing changes are inevitable, he thought it was cumbersome to come before the city every time a new item is marketed. He asked the Board of Adjustment to overturn the previous direction and allow the sale of A TV's and snowmobiles which use is compatible in character and impact with other allowed uses. Board Member HOVLAND expressed concern that sales could be expanded to include dirt bikes or other vehicles that don't require licenses. Mr. Blumenthal responded that they have turned away similar products such as motorized bicycles. Board Member MONTOYA asked if Trailer Source sold pickup trucks. Mr. Blumenthal stated that, lll1der the original PCD, they are allowed to sell pickup trucks but are limited to fifteen at anyone time. Dick Scheurer returned to the podium. He presented a list of uses allowed in the Plarmed Board of Adjustment Minutes Page 6 03/23-00 Commercial Development and stated his opinion that ATV's and snowmobiles are compatible in character and impact with those uses. He commented that these uses are not listed in the appropriate zone district; however, many products were not arolll1d at the time the zoning ordinance was written. He stated it should not be necessary to rezone every time a new product comes on the market. He had prepared an analysis of impacts listed in the PCD as they relate to the sale of ATV's and snowmobiles and submitted copies of the analysis to the Board members. This analysis was made a part of the case file. He stated that the Blumenthal's have a record of cooperation with the City and there were no letters of warnings or surrnnonses issued which indicated the sale of ATV's and snowmobiles were not legallll1til the matter went to City Council. He stated there is case law that says when an interpretation is required due to ambiguous language, the interpretation should favor the land owner and not add more restrictions over what a landowner may do with his property. He referred to the letter from Mr. Brengle of the West Chamber (earlier entered into the record by Alan White) which expressed concern about business owners operating in a plarmed development having to come before City Council each time they want to add a product line. He also entered into the record a letter from Sergeant Jay Gray of the Wheat Ridge Police Department which indicated traffic at the subject site has not been a problem as well as a letter from Rosanna Colson and Ed Volleberg who indicated their support of the application. These letters were made part of the case file. In regard to Mr. White's request for rebuttal, he stated he had no objection to Mr. White giving rebuttal. However, he did voice concern to the Board about counsel giving rebuttal because he was not sure ifMr. Dahl represented the Board or Mr. White. James Blumenthal returned to the podium. He stated that it was his intent to be a good neighbor and not to do anything wrong. He stated that he felt he has been held lll1justly at bay by others and asked the Board to rule in his favor. Kim Stewart 11700 West 46th Avenue Ms. Stewart was sworn in by Chair HOWARD. Ms. Stewart expressed her opposition to the sale of ATV's and snowmobiles because she felt that each new product added increased traffic impact on the neighborhood. She stated that she had contacted the police department over the past years when she observed situations such as lll1attended semi's parked in the northbound lane of Tabor Street. She also stated that she has contacted staff regarding problems at Trailer Source. She asked the Board to consider that a loose interpretation in this case would open the door for other situations which would have negative impacts on neighborhoods. Gerald Dahl, city attorney, stated that he plarmed to address the Board on behalf ofthe staff and plarming director who interpreted the ordinance to say snowmobiles and ATV's are not permitted on the PCD. He stated he was not representing the Board of Adjustment. Mr. Scheurer indicated he had no objection to Mr. Dahl speaking on behalf of the staff. Board of Adjustment Minutes 03123-00 Page 7 Mr. Dahl submitted copies of two documents entitled "Findings and Decision" and "Memorandum of Points and Authorities: Administrative Official Charged with Enforcement of a Statute or Ordinance" to the Board. These documents were entered into the record and made a part of the case file. He stated these two documents uphold the authority ofthe planning director's decision in this case. He stated that case law gives deference to the decision of the plarming administrator in cases of ambiguous language. He stated the fact that Trailer source pays taxes to the City of Wheat Ridge, has been a good corporate citizen and that no city violations had been issued has no bearing on the interpretation nor does the fact that Mr. Blumenthal chose not to sell dirt bikes. Further, the similar use language does not refer to the idea of marketing driving the business and having to come back whenever there is a new product line. He referred to Kim Stewart's testimony that additional traffic generated by these product lines will cause a negative impact to the neighborhood. He stated that the property was established as a PCD in 1995. Snowmobiles and ATV's were in existence at that time but were not included in the list of uses in the PCD. He reminded the Board that this is not general commercial retail, but a PCD with a list of uses which needs to be adhered to. He urged the body to adopt these findings by resolution. Dick Scheurer returned to the podium for rebuttal. He stated that the Board's instruction was to decide if ATV and snowmobile sales is a similar use in terms of character and impact with other uses in the PCD. He stated that evidence shows that ATV's and snowmobiles have a very close relationship and originated out of the equine uses. He stated that the record is devoid of any information to form a basis for a finding that ATV's and snowmobiles are more objectionable than other uses in the PCD. He asked the Board to make a common sense decision in favor of the applicant. Upon a motion by Board Member HOVLAND and second by Board Member BROWN the following resolution was stated: Whereas, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and Whereas, the Board of Adjustment Case No. W A-00-02 is an appeal to this Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and Whereas, the property was originally posted for the fifteen days required by law and in recognition of protest registered against it; and Whereas, the relief applied for may be granted without detriment to the public welfare and without substantially impairing the intent and purposes of the regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge. Now, therefore, be it resolved that Board of Adjustment Application Case No. W A-OO- 02 be interpreted to include possible ATV and snowmobile sales. Board of Adjustment Minutes 03/23-00 Page 8 Type oflnterpretation: Interpretation of the permitted use regulations in a Planned Commercial Development. The Board finds that, based upon evidence presented and based upon the conclusions relative to other similar uses, the applicant's request would be an approved use in the Planned Commercial Development. Board Member ECHELMEYER stated that he would be in favor of the application if the semi traffic could be controlled. Board Member HOVLAND stated that, while he shared a concern about traffic, there were other items in the list of permitted uses that could generate at least as much traffic. He stated that the Board's purpose was not to regulate the site but to determine if this is an intended similar use. In response to a question from Board Member MAURO, Mr. White explained that the interpretation would only apply to the subject plarmed development and would not affect other plarmed developments within the city. Board Member HOVLAND asked if the interpretation could include traffic restrictions. Mr. Dahl cited Section 2-61-D(3) of the city code which says the Board has the authority to affirm, reverse or modifY. Because a super majority vote is required, the motion failed by a vote of 4 to 2 with Board Members HOWARD and MONTOYA voting no. Dick Scheurer referred to a code provision which requires a simple majority in case of interpretations as opposed to a super majority. Gerald Dahl informed Mr. Scheuerer that the code had been amended within the last year to provide for a super majority vote in all cases considered by the Board of Adjustment including cases of interpretation. Chair HOWARD informed the applicant that the zoning administrator's interpretation will stand. (Chair HOWARD declared a brief recess at 10: 1 0 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 10:20 p.m.) C. Case No. TUP-00-02: An application filed by Lisa Aiello for approval of a temporary use permit to operate a retail garden, fresh produce market and Christmas tree lot from April 1, 2000 through March 31, 200!. Said property is located at 10590 West 44th Avenue and zoned Agricultural-One. This case was presented by Mary Austin. She reviewed the staff report, presented slides and overheads of the subject property and entered all pertinent documents into the record which were accepted by Chair HOWARD. She advised that all notification and posting requirements had been met and there was jurisdiction for the Board to hear the case. She Board of Adjustment Minutes Page 9 03/23-00 reviewed the five criteria involved in evaluating a temporary use permit. Staff recommended denial of the request for reasons outlined in the staff report. If the proposed business is going to operate on a continuous year-rolll1d basis, proper zoning with required site improvements should be pursued. Lisa Aiello 6364 Newland, Arvada Ms. Aiello was sworn in by Chair HOWARD. She supplied copies of her presentation to members ofthe Board. She stated that, even though this is her second request for a TUP, it was not her intention to make a yearly request. She intended to give the business a two- year trial period and then pursue purchase of the property, request a rezone and build a permanent structure for her business. Pat Aiello 1096 Aspen Drive, Clear Creek County Mr. Aiello, the applicant's father, was sworn in by Chair HOWARD. He stated that, if the TUP is granted and the business does well again this year, they will definitely negotiate a purchase of the property and come back to the city for a zoning change. Board Member HOVLAND expressed concern about noise resulting from the change in location for the refrigerated trailer which would affect the apartments located to the south. Ms. Aiello stated her intent in changing the location ofthe trailer from last year is to provide more visibility for her tent. Mr. Aiello stated that there were no complaints about noise from the trailer last year; however, they would be willing to abide by the Board's wishes concerning the location of the trailer. Board Member HOVLAND asked if the applicant had complied with last year's condition that the space beneath the trailer be enclosed with plywood. Mr. Aiello stated they did not add an enclosure because they determined there was no problem with noise. Chair HOWARD questioned the reason for requesting a full year, which is a change from last year's TUP which expired on December 31. Ms. Aiello explained that, since she was plarming to purchase the property, it would be easier to leave the equipment on the property rather than moving it at the end of December only to bring it back again in another three months. She indicated, however, that she would be willing to accept an expiration date of December 31 this year. Larry Olson 11556 West Kentucky Drive, Lakewood Mr. Olson, owner of the subject property, was sworn in by Chair HOWARD. He verified that he would be willing to sell the property to the applicant but indicated he needed another year to take care of title matters, etc. in order for this to happen. He also owns the property next door to the west. In response to a question by Board Member ECHELMEYER, he stated that this location was a site for a fruit market from 1950 through the 1970's. Page 10 Board of Adjustment Minutes 03/23-00 Kathy Weiss 4370 Moore Street Ms. Weiss was sworn in by Chair HOWARD. She presented a petition containing signatures from the surrolll1ding neighbors who were in favor of the application. Upon a motion by Board Member MAURO and second by Board Member BROWN, the following resolution was stated: Whereas, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and Whereas, the Board of Adjustment Application Case No. TUP-00-02 is an appeal to this Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and Whereas, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law and there were no protests registered against it; and Whereas, the relief applied for may be granted without detriment to public welfare and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge. Now, therefore, be it resolved that Board of Adjustment Application Case No. TUP-OO- 02 be, and hereby is, approved. For the following reasons: 1. There were no complaints registered against last year's TUP. 2. The intent of the applicant was to operate on a two-year basis, and this would be the second test year in that plan. 3. Plans do indicate a future property purchase if all goes well. With the following conditions: 1. The site will be operated as the site plan has indicated on March 23, 2000. If needed, plywood noise barriers will be erected on the refrigeration unit and painted to match. 2. The hours of operation will be the same as last year: the unit may not be turned on before 9:00 a.m. and must be shut off at 7:00 p.m. every night, including weekends and during Sunday services for the church across the street. 3. The TUP shall last from April 1, 2000 to March 31, 2001. The motion carried by a vote of 6-0 with Board Member ABBOTT absent. Chair HOWARD advised the applic~t that her application was granted. D. Case No. W A-00-03: An application filed by Daniel Grantham for approval of a 12-foot side yard setback variance from the 15-yard side yard setback requirement for the purpose of a garage addition for property located at 2970 Upham Street and zoned Residential-One. Board of Adjustment Minutes Page 11 03/23-00 This case was presented by Mary Austin. She reviewed the staff report, presented slides and overheads of the subject property and entered all pertinent documents into the record which were accepted by Chair HOWARD. She advised that all notification and posting requirements had been met and there was jurisdiction for the Board to hear the case. The ten criteria used in evaluation of a variance request were reviewed and she noted that the city had not received any objections to the application. Staff recommended denial of the request for reasons outlined in the staff report. Board Member MONTOYA expressed concern that the slides indicated there is a shadow line from Mr. Grantham's structure on the property line and extending the garage would shade a portion of the neighbor's property. Daniel Grantham 2970 Upham Street Mr. Grantham was sworn in by Chair HOWARD. He stated, for the record, that he was not aware of the staffs recommendation for denial until the day before the hearing and was therefore lll1able to contact his neighbors. In regard to establishing a hardship, Mr. Grantham stated that he purchased the property under the impression that the previous . owners had received approval to build a garage. The house to the north would be twenty- two feet from the proposed addition and, therefore, would not alter the character of the neighborhood. He stated he would be willing to reduce the size of his garage from twelve feet to ten feet. The only alternative to this plan would be to build an additional garage in the back of the property which he felt would not be in keeping with other homes in the area and would present an inconvenience. He believed the proposed addition would also increase property values in the area. Upon a motion by Board Member ECHELMEYER and second by Board Member BROWN, the following resolution was stated: Whereas, the applicant was denied permission by an administrative officer; and Whereas, W A-00-03 is an appeal to this Board from the decision of an administrative officer; and Whereas, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law and there were no protests registered against it; and Whereas, the relief applied for may not be granted without detriment to public welfare and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge. Now, therefore, be it resolved that Board of Adjustment Application Case No. WA-OO- 03 be, and hereby is, denied. Type of Variance: A 12-foot side yard setback variance from the IS-foot side yard setback requirement for the purpose of building a garage addition. Board of Adjustment Minutes 03/23-00 Page 12 1. This variance would considerably impact the property values in the area in that there are no other properties within this particular zoning that have exceeded the IS-foot side yard setback. For the Following Reasons: The motion carried by a vote of 6-0 with Board Member ABBOTT absent. Chair HOWARD advised the applicant that his request had been denied. 5. CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING Chair HOWARD declared the public hearing closed. 6. OLD BUSINESS There was no old business to come before the Board. 7. NEW BUSINESS A. Anoroval of Minutes It was moved by Board Member HOVLAND and seconded by Board Member MAURO to approve the minutes of January 27, 2000 and February 24,2000. Motion carried 5-0 with Board Member MONTOYA abstaining and Board Member ABBOTT absent. B. Board of Adiustment Traininl!: Session - Since there are no cases scheduled to come before the Board at its April meeting, Alan White armounced a training session to be held at 6:00 p.m. on April 27, 2000. 8. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Board Member HOVLAND and seconded by Board Member ECHELMEYER to adjourn the meeting a111 :27 p.m. The motion unanimously carried. C? ~ ~~L<J-~ BOB HOW RD, Chairman Board of Adjustment / ~ ~~~ Ann Lazzeri, Secretary Board of Adjustment C:\Barbara\PCRPTS\PLANGCO:M\PCMINUTE\000323.wpd Board of Adjustment Minutes 03/23-00 Page 13