Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWA-15-04City of � 6a W CC?P�1h�ttnit* rrY DEVELOPMENT T City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 291x` Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 June 1 1, 2015 Ken Relyea 177 W. Alameda Ave. Denver, CO 80223 Dear lair. Relyea: Enclosed Tease find a copy of the Approval ofVariance and the staff report. All variance approvals automatically expire within 180 days of the approval date unless a building permit for the variance is obtained within such period of time. The expiration date for this variance approval is December 7, 2015. Please feel free to contact me at (303) 235-2846 if you have any questions. Sincerely, htN'�- �Q �VNV�� Krim Waggoner Administrative .Assistant Enclosure: Approval of Variance and Staff Report Cc: WA -15-04 (case file) W A 1504.doc wwww.ci.whestridge.co.us • City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29'h Ave, Wheat Ridge., CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235,2846 F: 303,235.2857 WHEREAS, an application for a variance was submitted for the Property located at 3660 Hoyt Court referenced as Case No. WA- I 5-04/Heinzeroth; and WHEREAS, City staff found basis for approval of the variance, relying on criteria listed in Section 26-115 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws and on information submitted in the case file; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has properly notified pursuant to Section 26-109 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws; and WHEREAS, there were no registered objections regarding the application; I . 'The request would not alter the essential character of the locality, 2. The applicant is proposing substantial investment in the property. 3. There are unique circumstances due to the original subdivision plat, 4. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare and would not be injurious to neighboring property or improvements, 5. There have been no protests submitted during the ten-day public notification period. f � I P� i4nstne, A P —A Date Developil nt Director www-d-wheatridge.coms 91 City of "�qWheat I , dge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO: Community Development Director CASE MANAGER: Meredith Reckert CASE NO. & NAME: WA- 15-04/Heinzeroth DATE: June 4, 2015 ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a 12' side setback variance to the 25' rear yard setback requirement in an R-2 zone district LOCATION: 3660 Hoyt Court OWNER (S): Tom Heinzeroth and Susan Breckinridge APPROXIMATE AREA: 9470 square feet of land area PRESENT ZONING: PRESENT LAND USE: Residential -Two (R-2) Single Family Residential ENTER INTO RECORD: (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) ZONING ORDINANCE Administrative Review WA- 15-04/Heinzeroth JURISDICTION: All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, an administrative decision may be made on this request. I. REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a variance request for construction of a detached garage in an R-2 zone district at 3660 Hoyt Court. The specific request is to allow a 12.5' rear yard setback variance from the required 25' rear yard setback requirement in an R-2 zone resulting in a 12.5' rear setback for construction of a 24' x 30' detached garage. (Exhibit 1, Letter of Request/Responses to Evaluation Criteria) Section 26-115.0 (Variances and Waivers) of the Wheat Ridge City Code allows that the Director of Community Development (Director) may grant administrative variances from the strict application of the zoning district development standards. Administrative variances are allowed for up to 50% of the development standard. All other development standards have been met. II. CASE ANALYSIS Existing Site Conditions The property is 9870 square feet in size and is zoned R-2. The lot is a "through -lot" with frontage on both Hoyt Court and Hoyt Street. There is an existing home on the property with a footprint of 1600 square feet built in 1959. This figure includes an attached single car garage. (Exhibit 2, Site Photos) The home's front faces Hoyt Court and the rear of the property has frontage on Hoyt Street. The applicant is proposing a detached garage located in the northeastern corner of the property with access to Hoyt Street. (Exhibit 3 and 4, site plan and structure elevations) The property was subdivided as part of the Leo Subdivision which was approved in 1955. (Exhibit 5, Leo Subdivision) Leo Subdivision included fourteen lots. Twelve of these properties are double -fronted between Hoyt Street, Hoyt Court and Independence Street. Section 26- 411.C.3. of the Subdivision Regulations prohibits through lots with new development unless they are essential to provide separation from major arterials. Rationale for this provision is to avoid new lots which have to meet a greater setback on both the front and rear. The property is surrounded on all sides with R-2 zoning and single family development. (Exhibit 6, Aerial Photo) Administrative Review 2 WA-15-04/Heinzeroth Pursuant to the R-2 zone district regulations, rear setbacks abutting public streets must have a 25' setback. A garage could be built meeting the required 25' setback from the east side but it would put the garage less than 10' from the rear of the home. R-2 Development Standard Required Proposed Lot coverage 40% maximum 17% existing 24.6% with new garage Setbacks for detached garage Front (west): 25' 30.1' Rear (east) 25' 12.5' Side north): 10' 81 Side south 10' 43' Resulting variance requests 12.5' rear setback variance (50%) No objections were received during the 10 day posting period. III. VARIANCE CRITERIA In order to authorize an administrative variance, the Director must determine that the majority of the criteria for review listed in Section 26-115.C.4 of the City Code have been met. Staff provides the following review and analysis of the variance criteria. 1. The property in question would not yield a reasonable return in use, service, or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located. The property could still be used as a single family residence without the need for a variance but it would preclude construction of a detached garage in the most logical location. There are alternative locations where a garage could be constructed that would meet setbacks but could negatively impact the aesthetics of the backyard due to the separation of the new garage from the rear of the house. Staff finds that this criterion has not been met. 2. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. There appear to be other setback encroachments in the area. A property two parcels to the south at 3620 Hoyt Court has a garage similar in size with a 12' rear setback from Hoyt Street approved pursuant to Case No. WA -97-19. Administrative Review WA- 15-04/Heinzeroth Staff finds that this criterion has been met. 3. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property, with this application, which would not be possible without the variance. This project represents a substantial investment in the property. There is currently a single car attached garage on the property. Additional covered parking can be an important asset desired by contemporary home buyers if and when the property would be sold. There is no room for expansion of the house to the north, south or west. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 4. The particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved results in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out. There are unique conditions related to the lot configuration due to public street frontages on both the front and rear sides of the property. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 5. The alleged difficult' or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. The hardship was created by the original subdivision approval in 1955 which included 12 through -lots. Staff finds this criterion has not been met. 6. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located, by, among other things, substantially or permanently impairing the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or substantially diminishing or impairing property values within the neighborhood. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare and would not be injurious to neighboring property or improvements. It would not hinder or impair the development of the adjacent property. The adequate supply of air and light would not be compromised as a result of this request. The request would not increase Administrative Review 4 W A -15-04/H einzeroth the congestion in the streets, nor would it increase the danger of fire. The request will most likely not have a negative effect on property values in the neighborhood. Staff finds that this criterion has been met. 7. The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are present in the neighborhood and are not unique to the property. There are 12 lots in the Leo Subdivision which have double frontages. Each of these properties will have the same challenge with 25' setbacks on both the front and rear of the properties. Staff finds that this criterion has been met. 8. Granting of the variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities. Single family dwellings and their accessory structures are not subject to accessibility requirements. Staff finds that this criterion is not applicable. 9. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual. Single family dwellings and their accessory structures are not subject to the requirements of the ASDM. Staff concludes that this criterion is not applicable. 1V. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Having found the application in compliance with the majority of the review criteria, staff recommends approval of the variance request. Staff has found that there are unique circumstances attributed to this request due to the lot configuration and the plat design approved in 1955. Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL for the following reasons: 1. The request would not alter the essential character of the locality. 2. The applicant is proposing substantial investment in the property. 3. There are unique circumstances due to the original subdivision plat. 4. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare and would not be injurious to neighboring property or improvements. 5. There have been no protests submitted during the ten-day public notification period. Administrative Review 5 WA-15-04/Heinzeroth EXHIBIT 1 -LETTER OF REQUEST 1 ) The property owners located at 3660 Hoyt Court would tike to build a 14x30 detached garage. Currently they have only a one car attached garage The new contemporary homeowner needs more space prrsrntiv than they have in the past. In this particular case the Heinzeroths' are wanting to put their belongings under cover. At the present time they have a boat and two vehicles. With this addition they would be able to sahsfy those needs 2 1 This variance would nit atter the essential character of the neighborhood. The Heinzeroths have spent a lot of time going throughout the area checking out different properties to make sure they would not impact their neighborhood in a negative way. After seeing many driveways coming off the various surrounding streets, it was apparent to them this additional driveway would not have any impact out of the ordinary. 3 ) Without the variance the homeowners would not be able to construct the detached garage to put their belongings under cove r. Without the variance the Heireroths' would hair to xt the gorogc bock an sJJitwlial 12.]'. By nlUVing tilt, afliarism paray b:ic.k the yard would be eaten up by the construction, They have 5 grandchildren that they spend a great deal of time with at their residence. The fear is that they are not only losing space for the children to play, but it would also create a large blind spot for watching the children while they play 4) The shape of the lot plus the size of the house make it impossible to have any other chokes than this particular variance. The lots are very narrow for the width of the houses that were built in the neighborhood If the house had been built deeper and not as wide, the homeowners would have an opportunity to build a garage next to or lust behind the principal building. Because there Is not enough side setback, the detached garage must be accessed from Hoyt Street_ I The Heinzeroths' have not created any particular or unique hardship When they bought the property there were already two fronts. They have not added any additional physical characteristics to this property that would be a self-imposed hardship. 6) By granting this variance it would not be detrimental to the public welfare In fact it would take vehicles from street parking, by removing the vrhides off the street. This would make it safer for children playing, and not coming out from between vehicle into Public right of way The detached would not impair any adjacent properties It also would not impair light or air from the neighbors, in fact by being located closer to Hoyt Stir, It would allow better light and air flow to the neighbors while enjoying their back patios The homeowners feel it would increase property values by offer+ng better curb appeal to the neighborhood by not having cars in front of [tie house. Administrative Review 6 WA- 15-04/Heinzeroth T) As previousiy stated, the Heinreroths haw* driven through the area to evaluate their request for the SM variance In the process they have found many driveways on arl the street~, therefore reakring another drive would not bean unusual circumstance yr condition to the area. In addition there is a garage with the. exact location and drive that they are requesting two doors away. 8-y N/A 9.1 N/A Administrative Review W A-15-04/Heinzeroth EXHIBIT 2 -SITE PHOTOS WA- 15-04/Heinzeroth Front of house Rear of house EXHIBIT 3 -SITE PLAN W>E_Q�/10/761 171AL dOBR t�-199 RoEJMU CUEW �11011Lat.r rsr�e AOo— 3-0 =T COOT L AND S U R V E Y ING NiutE ;4tO Wry TPUNT 54ao WAND ROAD • swnt 160 - Ap-M G�AAjftn ! lOM2 (309)420786 lMPreovEwowr LejtA 10N CErrrlrlCA-M LEGokLDESCRIF , Sale: I *-W (/[w 0.lerrr) F—. r; NM -iso suwrriaal, 16111DPYt d ur.ca M l oeltrd as Shewn oomrrr or JBFFEN 0lr, An Imp— &-W PIN in R400mawee start Or CMMADD for PYrciu l.trmfon of ImproKmm m J Administrative Review 9 WA-15-04/Heinzeroth I LOT 13 1 Fawd I Ctoss + ]XI S 1 r 6 Now: R� � QrDray Wslktvay F.tc� Fxlndr - .4 COMM _ b orm�lyeCf b � $ � C ^ O- glory o !' v I. _ 1 o Cirlcrek Brick yy lo.cr s 10.1' S �+ 7A Sbod - - - � 10.5 6 30.1 _ Common 1� Food cr— IZi li �1 1 I I IAT 11 1 I Administrative Review 9 WA-15-04/Heinzeroth EXHIBIT 4 - BUILDING ELEVATIONS SA«.G hS 1leauac. .�i�-LV �Lc..ti a=T. tcMETA ►3aa�r PlAji, ' 1. "'1 C� `1 IdEN, Ally � �.I :� .-�. �I � .Ip.I Z'r�N t1U SII' .T•�111 .Mr— 1<rl sT s_k L :.7 Administrative Review 10 WA-15-04/Heinzeroth 8 BOOK i iZ PAGE �Z,� LEO SUBDIVISION OF A PART OF THE SI/2 WI/2 W1/2NE1/4NW1/4 SECTION27 T35. R.69W. OF THE 6TH PM, I I Ij I CA DEL VUE SUB. 125'KNOW /. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That we the undersigned, Mary T Reed and Lao✓ Reed, being the owners of the ----'-------- -----J I L iCJ S112 W/72 W1/2 NE1/4 NW114 Section 27 %35 R 69 of the 6TNPM except the North 25 feet, the West 25 feet and the East N WEST 37TH AVE. v� !®feet thereof; have laid out, subt6vided and platted into tots, streets and avenues under the name and style I North line-Sli2B'I%1WWAFV-fAV174— T'1=89 - - -" - �J of C£0 SUBDIVISION and do by these presents pram and dedtocle to Jefferson County, Colorado, in fee simple, all such streets 12615/?e/5 !� and avenues, and that those certain restrictive covenants recorded in Book-2�e-ZolPopelS4of the records of Jefferson County 25' j25 p§' \+ she// apply to al/ lots in This subdivison I ^ 14 STAT£ OF COLORADO-' I I r COUNTY OF JEFFERSON I I The above and foregoing mop and dedication of LEO SUBO/V15lO'V was acknowAtaged before me this3_"day old r :.1955 I 2 13 ^ � � I � DY Mary T Reed and Leo ✓ Reed ¢ I Witness my hand and afficai sea/ My commission expires !-M-gq-"55 �I -- — F �--- - - - �TTQR/Y�ICALIF h o I W 9erna % 4. E� k, on altarney-of-low duly licensed Jc prothte before courts of record of Colorado, do hereby certify that = l hove examined the Idles of al/ fonds hereinabove dedicated and shown upon the within plot es a public way, and the/ title to o I w ^ Ie 1 3 12 Z o "� I Q such fonds is in the dedicators, free and clear of al/ lien and encumbrances. cxrelr needy of rrwrT r-emrdK( r 6..k yes Haat 99 a- 6­f9;i a7 R'gc x.35. N 72815• r cn i h I 54IRVEr9??—/�1C'ATE WL yl W 4 ,� I I ^ I3 I t, Robert B Morrison, a registered land surveyor in the Stale of Colorado, do hereby teddy that' the survey of LEO SUROlV/SION 13 W i J was made under my supervision and that the accompanying map accurately and properly shows sold subd/vis/on. Wj- I al z \\� W O L---___- eCORr �[ �A"0 SIIIIVE,011 •',�•. �r77 tyl a 2 I ✓A',�, � ryh N i i SCALE /"=50• The foregoing Surveyors Certificate was subscribed and sworn to before me Ldo), of --?16 1955 by Robert 6 Morrison 5 ^ IQ ^ Dimensions at rounded corners ore tc Wilness my hand and offica/ seal. My commission expires—:a,.�. ' -'S# - - ,,� �ka Z. + s to theintersection of /opines extended — N L_-_____ .9ad,, on street intersections are /5feel- W Y Y g -z day o/• 1955 '' Approved 6 the Jefferson Count Planning Commissan lht The foregoing plot is approved to filing and conveyance of the public way, roods and streets shown thereon is accepted by — 128.15' the County of Jefhrson, Colorado, lhday o/�-'•� f9�5 Sabyect to the folioovng condhons: V Z O WEST 36TH AVE W I a The County shall underfoke mainlence of any such public way, rood or street only after construction of such public way, 75 75• rood or street hos been satisfactorily completed by the Subdivider BOARD�F yam_ COMM/SSVNMR Q I i � I = I NOT A PART VF THISJ'1r-t- I W I SUBDNISION I -- 3 1 7 aE8K--AA JAR-ECORDERS CERT/f/GATE I I 1 I '7- i I Accepted for tiling in the al/ice o/ the Clerk and Recorder of Jefferson County al Golden, Colorado this_:•day o><4--1955 Reception No._14,a:a�,_ Time--2--tis�Z- h1. - W 35TH AVEC M I - - - Soafh line 1VF1/4 .NW//4 Section 27 -3-69 + , 7 • 4r UNSUBDIVIDED EXHIBIT 5 V EXHIBIT 6 —AERIAL PHOTOS site Case No. WA -97-19 Administrative Review 1 WA- 15-04/Heinzeroth CRY of' Wheatr4cige MWMOIMM���# © (as required pursuant to Code Section 26-109.D) This is an administrative variance review with a 10 -day posting period. Public comments concerning this request are due in writing by 5:00 p.m. on MaY--?-1-,-?PI�. I Aqggpqer, Administrative Assistant, Communi hereby certify that I mailed a total of 11 letters on MPY-_l,.l,.- 2015 to the attached recipient list. Signature: `Jowt/v Date//f /�«�.� - City of Wheatl we COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 291h Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 LETTER NOTICE May 12, 2015 Dear Property Owner: This is to inform you of Case No. WA -15-04, a request for a 12.5 foot (50%) variance from the 25 foot requirement for a rear setback in the R-2 zone district for construction of a detached garage. The attached aerial photo identifies the location of the variance request. The applicant for this case is requesting an administrative variance review which allows no more than a fifty percent (50%) variance to be granted by the Zoning Administrator without need for a public hearing. Prior to the rendering of a decision, all adiacent property owners are required to be notified of the request by certified mail. If you have any questions, please contact the Planning Division at 303-235-2846 or if you would like to submit comments concerning this request, please do so in writing by 5:00 p.m. on May 21, 2015. Thank you. W A 1504.doc www.cl.wheatridge.co.us Vicinity May A request for a 12.5 foot (50%) variance from the 25 foot requirement for a rear setback in the R-2 zone district for construction of a detached garage. i I Found r+ Gari v I % 3 Vote: n 2' nrcowmte Walkway Exlm& v oraoSubjeo .. C5 ; a pros. o v O w two CotrtttC > 7A T � • r '� , O• �' UITYC t?N•• • —70.1 — I I" Fottate t # CfCM j Site Plan LO 1 13 128.13 Concteoc �` O – •� (kir StDy o r' - . _'.C.'' = r'J Wick 123.15 10.0 x 10.1' SAsd --"` 9 A GILMER, RYAN W FULLERTON DALE L 3660 HOYT TRUST 3680 HOYT "'T" 3635 HOYT Cl' 3660 HOYT CT WHEATRIDGE CO 80033 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 TRUJILLO LOUIS A 3665 HOLLAND CT WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 NORRIS EDWARD S NORRIS KATHLEEN J 3620 I-fOYTCT HEAT RIDGE CO 80033 DION RUSSELL M SUTHE'RLAND LARA LEE 3675 HOYTC'F WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 MASS CARL I MASS CELINA P 5812 QUEEN ST ARVADA CO 80004 BRUNT Z DORIS J 3655 HOYT CT WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 ROMANSKI ANN B 3640 IJOYTCT WHEATRIDGE CO 80033 MICHAEL F & KAREN K GABRIELE LVG TRUST 3690 HON,7CT WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 RUTH ELAINE KERSELI, LIVING TRUST 3645 HOLLAND CT WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 Property appraisal system Page I ot'l Property rn '1npforormabon Property Address: 03660 HOYT CT [owner Name(s WHEAT RIDGE CO, 80033 5758 13660 HOYT TRU Mailing Address: SAME ADDRESS AS PROPERTY PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Subdivision Name: 465600 - LEO W -M. 1-71m- PROPERTYINVENTORY Property Type REBID Year Built: 1959 Adjusted Year Built: 1967 TAX INFORihATION 1Lq&Vrtr InfQrmaw L View Mill Levy Detail For Year 2015 Mill Levy Information 'County School WHEAT RIDGErt . . . ... ..... FIRE DIST WESTRIDGE SAN DIST WH WATER DIST man womwiiiiiI http://`J*effco.us/ats/displaygeneral.do?sch=023372 6/4/2015 DATE 04/10/201WEE 175.00 JOB# 15-199 �" CLIENT AFFORDABLE GARAGES ADDRESS 3660 HOYT COURT LAND SUR V E Y I NG NAME 3660 HOYT TRUST 5460 WARD ROAD+ SUITE 160 ARVADA, COLORADO 80002 (303) 420-4788 LEGAL DESCRIPTION IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE (PER CLIENT) 1 LOT 12 Note: LEO SUBDIVISION, Certificate is Based on Control as Shown, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, An Improvement Survey Plat is Recommended STATE OF COLORADO for Precise Location of Improvements. Scale: 1"--20' Found �e !• Cross I I 3 '3 128.15 r„ 26.1 ! c r 64.6— 3 i•� Note: 0.2' of Concrete Walkway Extends ontoSubject Property • o Concrete O U ! _ 7.4 T ,.`.._.._..s.:�._.._.._.. v i i •Concrete • N o` M f a Drive, o� i .._.._.�.._.._ .4- 30.1— Found 4._.30.1Found Cross i I I L LOT 13 I I N, I 128.15 26.1 64.6— �0')ft — a Concrete One Story c s: _: � -- -�. �, - - - Brick I I 0 i 10.5 3 • I i 23.0 "! i Concrete 128.15 LOT 11 10.0' x 10.1' Shed J i■ H ' � _Z> Vr t'itT5 VI n -I t , 3, 6,0 `6 " -, 14 T 41 A -A Ix t'l r -ft--, o--. =fl I t'itT5 VI n -I t , 3, 6,0 `6 " -, 14 T 41 A -A Ix t'l r -ft--, o--. 1.) The property owners located at 3660 Hoyt Court would like to build a 2430 detached garage. Currently they have only a one car attached garage. The new contemporary homeowner needs more space presently than they have in the past. In this particular case the Heinzeroths" are wanting to put their belongings under cover. At the present time they have a boat and two vehicles. With this addition they would be able to satisfy those needs. 2.) This variance would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The Heinzeroths have spent a lot of time going throughout the area checking out differe�l properties to make sure they would not impact their neighborhood in a negative wa After seeing many driveways coming off the various surrounding streets, it was apparent to them this additional driveway would not have any impact out of the ordinary. 3.) Without the variance the homeowners would not be able to construct the detached garage to put their belongings undercover. Without the variance the Heizeroths' would have to set the garage back an additional 12.5". By moving the detached garage back the yard would be eaten up by the construction. They have 5 grandchildren that they spend a great deal of time with at their residence. The fear is that they are not only losing space for the children to play, but it would also create a large blind spot for watching the children while they play. 411 -) The shape of the lot plus the size of the house make it impossible to have any other chM ices than this particular variance. The lots are very narrow for the width of the houses that were built in the neighborhood. If the house had been built deeper and not as wide, the homeowners would have an opportunity to build a garage next to or just behind the principal building. Because there is not enough side setback, the detached garage must be accessed from Hoyt Street. 5.) The Heinzeroths' have not created any particular or unique hardship. When they bought the property there were already two fronts. They have not added any additional physical characteristics to this property that would be a self-imposed hardship. 6.) By granting this variance it would not be detrimental to the public welfare. In fact it would take vehicles from street parking, by removing the vehicles off the street. This would make it safer for children playing, and not coming out from between vehicle in public right of way. The detached would not impair any adjacent properties. It also would not impair light or air from the neighbors, in fact by being located closer to Ho Str. It would allow better light and air flow to the neighbors while enjoying their back patios. The homeowners feel it would increase property values by offering better cur appeal to the neighborhood by not having cars in front of the house. 'I previously stated, the Heinzeroths have driven through the area to evaluate their request for the 50% variance. In the process they have found many driveways on all the streets, therefore realizing another drive would not be an unusual circumstance or condition to the area. In addition there is a garage with the exact location and drive that they are requesting two doors away. mum Elm To whom it may concern; Ken Relyea with Affordable Garages has the authority to fill out the land use processing application and also act on my behalf for the setback variance for the property located at 3660 Hoyt Ct., Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Thom Heinzeroth We would like to request a 50% variance for a setback of 12.5' opposed to the required 25'. We are asking for this so that the homeowner does not have to lose a larger portion of his yard to the construction. SVUATF�'Nl F', N'T(W,,� t MR ITY 3660 1, 1 his Wenwnt SMINK \ rehoes to 440 1 loot. 'Ind i'c'\e"mcd on hchdCo! 01'c I rust Inirsuant to the provkiom.-� (,)1'k,S, 'I I be uYst has been WMIUM MI&I #,#}a' ld\w'o I the S [,ae (O'Cokirado, 3. Ile YUHng achims Air Oh, mim is NOW S. Yoscmite Streci, I kniver, C0 80237, 4. '11h; muix, ami Ivshion ME 1wromi WOW& 10 CX0,'U1LC iW,',11-U11'M1tS awnilvd, or otherwise Iiffecfiny tile hi in pnqwny on WhAf oflo wuA an: Thomas (). Heinzerodi & Suskin A Breckinridge,'I't-tistee ot'3660 11t)N't Trim 5 1 he WHO; oFIR 1hreping 1wrm"i w GO ilk, trusi is finiin:�J h% Atiic1c 5. Sk:cfion of the Rust -\,grevrnent fo1'„o6o I fol , Frust, (v Pimsom to ( M. §31014 i 716L this Sivenion of Moudy �Imcnds zlnd super"ed"es ill idl respects any jue6nall execian! Slawnion of Awkwhy Air 3666 1 hy 1ANt, 3660 11MOTIMM' Thmas (). Heinzeroth. in his capachy ns FnBwc oT 3 W 1 hyi I jwt By sus'an J. B , reckinr I idge. in hor capn cky Li�, "Emswe of 36N) I hy IM!, S T Al F M (I M DRAI X) i he 16regoin � l -� \' "�5_ 2 1 p, inminm iN a owkno” kdpcd hekwe nw t 4 No VN C. 'rhumas (). Heinzeroth & Stisan J. 11reckinridge. hi Wher calwitly in; I ruswc 36M HoN i Sust "Inca my hwx! wKI oOkud sad, TODD I VAN RO OYAN FN7TPA1Tf PUN41 - WATE OF COLLOARADD Wall 11THC Notuy WSKJOMI oww4vWX44 An M Commission Expires 211612018 A ✓ V, City of ]�qrWh6atRijge LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION Community Development Department 7500 West 291h Avenue # Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 # Phone (303) 235-2846 (Please print or type all intbrmation) Address 1-7-7 -4e Applicant 41EPhone5:�6 —4an �tO 6A4q City ... !::I:) �t44) State Co Fax; A--734— 04roo Address Phone"— City_ 'Z� zip_, State Fax 6 Address Phone Mate --.-----,—F ax (The person listed as contact will be contacted to answer questions regarding this application. provide additional li—Coj�mation when —neeessary, post public hearing signs, will receive a copy of the shaft prior to Public Hearing. and shall be responsible for forwarding all verbal and written communication to applicant and owner.) Location of request (address): Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request): Please refer to submittal checklists for complete application requirentents; inconwlele applications 1411 not be accepteJ 0 Change of zone or zone conditions 0 Special Use Permit 0 Subdivision: Minor (5 lots or less) 0 Consolidation Plat 0 Conditional Use Permit 0 Subdivision: Major (More than 5 lots) 0 Flood Plain Special Exception 0 Site Plan approval CITemporary Use, Building, Sign 0 Lot Line Adjustment 0 Concept Plan approval 0 Variance/Waiver (from Section 0 Planned Building Group 0 Right of Way Vacation St OtherbA�_�gA- Required information: Assessors Parcel Number: Size of Lot (acres or square tootage): Current Proposed Zoning:____,,__ Current Proposed I certrli, that the nifin-mation e'via' c�fhibits herewith subinineti arc, true and correct to the best o 'ini Awoivletlge an(i t hot infifing this I am acting with the knowle(lge andconsent qfthose permnis listed above, witit(nit vhose consent the requesfecl action canrl()l Irrxrfrrllt, be aceoniplishetL AI)I,Vicants other than owners nn m submit oi �h ichofyirovedqfthan actionon his behalJ. Notarized Signature of Applicant_ State ol"Colorado, ef Ss County of To be filled out by staff - Date Cornp Plan Related Case No. Case Quarter section --Map - ------ Pre-App Mtg. Date-_- Case Manager Case No, WA1 504 Date Received 4/2WI2tI1I 5 1 Related Cates 'Case planner Botts Case Descrirjtiorfsa,­Acf k- . 19 RI of WhOatRidge 14; e" d MA Narne KenRetyela III Name Ph— (303) 5485497 Address 177W,Alameda Ave. coy Denver State to" Zip 8b 3 - FNSD RNINC, Rpt ICATI,,I�N p 4 PAYMENT RECUw,,,r,, Name Tom Heinzweth Name Phone (303) 90l -3322 'TOTAL Address 3660 Hoyt Ct. city XA/heat Ridge State CO Zip 60033- 240" C411PAWt Name Ken Retyea Name Phone pb3)'5A8-5497 i"Wd(ess 177WAlarnedaAve. City Denver State GQ yip 60223Addm,s, 3660 Street Hoyt Ct, City `Wheat Ridge State CO Zip 86033 Lacation Description Project Name 171-1 -----------------------Parcel No. r 3927209005 NW27 It 39-272.09-005 Qtr Section: NW27' 'District No,: 11 Pve-App Date Neighborhood Meeting Date App Na Rs, view Type Review Body Review Date Disposition Comments Report LM Case Disposition j Dispo6tion Date Conditions of Approval Notes Res 4 Ord Status Open Stotago:, of WhOatRidge 14; e" d MA L ICATINON FEES 1r18, 1 lei FNSD RNINC, Rpt ICATI,,I�N p 4 PAYMENT RECUw,,,r,, MEN(: 12449 AMOUN 11 'TOTAL 208.00 240"