HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/1/15I
City of
WheatR d c
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA
October 1, 2015
Notice is hereby given of a Public Meeting to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge Planning
Commission on October 1, 2015 at 7:00 p.m, in the City Council Chambers of the Municipal
Building, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado.
*Agendapackets and minutes are available online athttp://www.ci.wheatridge.co.usl95/Plarming-
Commission
1. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. APPROVE THE ORDER OF THE AGENDA (Items of new and old business may be
recommended for placement on the agenda.)
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — September 17, 2015
6. PUBLIC FORUM (This is the time for any person to speak on any subject not
appearing on the agenda. Public comments may be limited to 3 minutes.)
7. PUBLIC HEARING
A. Case No. WZ-15-05: An application filed by Lloyd Anastasi for approval of a zone
change from Residential -Two (R-2), Agricultural -One (A-1), Neighborhood Commercial
(NC) and Planned Commercial Development (PCD) to Mixed Use -Commercial (MU -C) for
property located at 4600 Kipling Street.
B. Case No. WZ-15-07: An application filed by Read King Medical Development for
approval of a zone change from Mixed Use -Neighborhood (MU -N) to Mixed Use
Commercial (MU -C) for property located at 3790 Wadsworth Boulevard.
S. OTHER ITEMS
9. ADJOURNMENT
Individuals with disabilities are encouraged to participate in all public meetings sponsored by the City of Wheat
Ridge. Call Heather Geyer, Public Information Officer at 303-235-2826 at least one week in advance of a
meeting if you are interested in participating and need inclusion assistance.
2.
3.
4.
5.
I
City Of
]�9rWheatRoge
PLANNING COMMISSION
Minutes of Meeting
September 17, 2015
CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chair BUCKNAM at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council
Chambers of the Municipal Building, 7500 West 29a Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado.
ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS
Commission Members Present:
Commission Members Absent:
Staff Members Present:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Alan Buckram
Emery Dorsey
Donna Kimsey
Scott Ohm
Dirk Boden
Steve Timms
Amanda Weaver
Pam Olson
Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner
Steve Art, Economic Development & Urban
Renewal Manager
Lisa Ritchie, Planner II
Tamara Odean, Recording Secretary
APPROVE ORDER OF THE AGENDA
It was moved by Commissioner Ohm and seconded by Commissioner Dorsey to
approve the order of the agenda.
Motion carried 7-0
APPROVAL OF MINUTES — August 6, 2015
It was moved by Commissioner Ohm and seconded by Commissioner Dorsey to
approve the minutes of August 6, 2015, as written.
Planning Commission Minutes
September 17, 2015
1—
Motion carried 5-0-2 with Commissioners Weaver and Timms abstaining.
6. PUBLIC FORUM (This is the time for any person to speak on any subject not appearing
on the agenda.)
No one wished to speak at this time.
PUBLIC HEARING
A. Case No. WZ-15-06:
Ms. Ritchie gave a short presentation regarding the zone change process and the
application. She entered into the record the contents of the case file, packet materials,
the zoning ordinance, and the contents of the digital presentation. She stated the public
notice and posting requirements have been met.
The applicant is requesting approval of a zone change from Residential -One (R-1) to
Mixed Use -Neighborhood (MU -N) for the property located at 10191 W. 38th Avenue.
The applicant has no specific redevelopment proposal at this time. This request is in
response to redevelopment in the area: The recently opened Starbucks, Sprouts and
Morningstar Senior Living which is currently under construction.
The current zoning, R-1, only allows single family residential. The proposed change,
MUN, allows residential, commercial or mixed use (live/work). It is possible nothing
will change on the lot with this request, but a zoning change allows possibilities for the
future. The size of the property is less than'/2 acre which somewhat limits potential
development on the property.
A neighborhood meeting was held July 28'2015. Six people from neighborhood
attended with no objections to the rezone. One neighbor submitted a written objection,
but only if marijuana is allowed, which it is not.
Commissioner TIMMS had a question regarding Exhibit 3 — Aerial Photo in packet.
He is wondering how to access the property located to the North and if the rezone
would affect the access to this site.
Ms. Ritchie stated there is currently no access to that parcel, and it may not be
developable because it is in a flood zone.
Ms. Reckert stated that a majority of the site is in a floodway so no structures will be
built.
Commissioner OHM had a question regarding Exhibit 2 in the packet. He wanted to
know if the R-1 zoning is on 38u' Avenue.
Planning Commission Minutes -2—
September
2—
September 17, 2015
Ms. Ritchie stated this happens often in Wheat Ridge and the zone district goes to the
center line in the road. Ms. Reckert agreed.
Commissioner OHM was concerned the dentist office zoning line doesn't extend to the
middle of the road.
Ms. Reckert stated that this will be corrected.
Chair BUCKNAM asked if it will go to the center line.
Ms. Ritchie confirmed that when the rezoning map is redrawn, the zone district line
will go to the street center line.
Chair BUCKNAM wanted to know if city staff received any concerns from Parks and
Rec or any other agencies related to the 50'height for other uses in a MU -N.
Ms. Ritchie said there were no concerns.
The applicant, Michael Buck, had nothing to add.
Chair BUCKNAM opened the Public Hearing
No one came forward to speak.
Chair BUCKNAM closed the Public Hearing
It was moved by Commissioner TIMMS and seconded by Commissioner OHM to
recommend approval of Case No. WZ-15-06, a request for approval of a zone
change from Residential -One (R-1) to Mixed Use -Neighborhood (MU -N) for
property located at 10191 W. 38a' Avenue, for the following reasons:
1. The proposed zone change will promote the public health, safety, or welfare of
the community.
2. The proposed zone change is consistent with the goals and objectives of the
City's Comprehensive Plan.
3. The zone change will provide additional opportunity for redevelopment in the
area.
4. The criteria used to evaluate a zone change support the request.
The motion was approved 7-0
8. OTHER ITEMS
A. Resolution 02-2015. Mr. Steve Art, Economic Development and Urban Renewal
Manager, gave a short presentation regarding Resolution 02-2015.
Planning Commission Minutes -3—
September
3—
September 17, 2015
Mr. Art requested the Planning Commission to adopt Resolution 02-2015 for a
property on the northwest corner of 38a' Avenue and Upham Street. The developer has
requested the use of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) for the development which
requires a substantial modification to the Wheat Ridge Town Center Project Urban
Renewal Plan. The Planning Commission is asked to adopt the resolution stating the
development conforms to the comprehensive plan for the City of Wheat Ridge.
This area is on West 38a' Avenue and was bought by Wazee Partners. The parcel has
2 vacant residential buildings and lvacant auto shop. Wazee Partners approached the
property next door (Vectra Bank) to inform them of the proposed project. Vectra
inquired to Wazee the possibility of purchasing their parcel and constructing a new
bank. The plan would be to build the new bank first then build new retail and housing
components.
The site is zoned Mixed Use -Commercial (MU -C).
Commissioner OHM asked for clarification of the proposed site legal description as
contained in Attachment A.
Mr. Art stated this is the 4a' amendment for the entire project and that Attachment A is
a legal description of the parcel they will control.
Commissioner OHM inquired why there were discrepancies between land areas in the
attached documents.
Tyler Downs — Wazee Partners (Applicant)
Mr. Downs with Wazee Partners states the zone lot description doesn't match because
the parcel is measured to the middle of the street zone.
Ms. Reckert clarified that the legal description contains the full width of the right-of-
way for both West 38a' Avenue and Upham Street.
Commission OHM wants to know if this is a Mixed Use -Commercial (MU -C) zoning
and if height can go up to 50'.
Mr. Downs stated the height limit is 6 stories or 75 feet.
Commission TIMMS asked if there will be any age restrictions similar to 44a' and
Wadsworth multi -family development.
Mr. Downs stated there will be no age restrictions.
Commissioner TIMMS asked what is time frame is in terms of phasing and whether
they are asking for TIF for both the property tax and sales tax. Mr. Downs said that is
correct.
Planning Commission Minutes -4—
September
4—
September 17, 2015
Mr. Downs stated they need to accommodate a new bank building for Vectra to house
the safety deposit boxes which cannot be temporarily stored. Once the new building is
complete and the old one demolished then the rest of project will break ground in late
2016, early 2017 with 18 months of construction. The two multi -story buildings will
be built simultaneously.
Commissioner TIMMS wanted to know potential uses for the commercial building.
Mr. DOWNS stated the preferred uses would be a local dining based entertainment
node with a local coffee shop, local ice cream shop and a local sit down restaurant and
bar.
Commissioner TIMMS questioned the staff of discussion about potentially moving
WR City Hall to this area as this is identified in the comprehensive plan.
Mr. Art stated it was identified in the 38u' Avenue Corridor Plan. At some point there
is still plenty of room that a civic component could be part of this project.
Commissioner KIMSEY asked if there is any plan in mind for building materials yet,
even though they are in the site development design phase.
Mr. Downs stated that the corridor has a lot of great tan and red brick elements. Red
brick will probably be used in the building elevations, with stucco.
Discussion continued regarding placement of the structures, the potential for
subsidized housing, parking and whether the new bank will have a drive-through.
Commissioner BUCKNAM asked if there is any comment from the Jefferson County
School District in relation to this resolution.
Mr. Art stated that once the Resolution is adopted, then the county and school district
will be notified and they will have 30 days to comment.
Commissioner BUCKMAN wanted to know how this resolution applies to improving
the coordination in transportation improvements.
Mr. Art stated there will be a bus stop adjacent to the project and the on-site parking
area will take congestion off the street.
Commissioner BUCKNAM asked if bike parking be included in the project.
Mr. Art indicated it would.
Commissioner BUCKNAM asked how a healthy/active community will be created.
Planning Commission Minutes - 5—
September 17, 2015
Mr. Art stated there are preliminary plans for a swimming pool, a work out center,
urban gardens, and solar options.
Commissioner BUCKNAM opened Public hearing and no one came forward to speak.
It was moved by Commissioner OHM and seconded by Commissioner Weaver to
adopt Resolution 02-2015, finding the Fourth Amendment to the Wheat Ridge Town
Center Project Urban Renewal Plan for the northwest corner of 38a' Avenue and
Upham Street is in conformance with the Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan,
Envision Wheat Ridge.
The motion was approved 7-0.
91
Ms. Reckert introduced, Lisa Ritchie, as a new Planner and Tammy Odean as the new
Administrative Assistant to Community Development. She also mentioned a new
Planner Technician will be starting Wednesday, September 23 and that the planning
division will now be back to full staffing.
9. ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Commissioner TIMMS and seconded by Commissioner
WEAVER to adjourn the meeting at 7:49 p.m.
Motion carried 7-0.
Alan Bucknam, Chair Tamara Odean, Recording Secretary
Planning Commission Minutes
September 17, 2015
6—
City of
Wheat,Rj ge
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission CASE MANAGER: M. Reckert
DATE OF MEETING: October 1, 2015
CASE NO. & NAME: WZ-15-05/Anastasi
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approval of a zone change from Residential -Two (R-2),
Agricultural -One (A-1), Neighborhood Commercial (NC)
and Planned Commercial Development (PCD) to Mixed
Use -Commercial (MU -C)
LOCATION OF REQUEST:
4600 Kipling
PROPERTY OWNER:
4600 Kipling LLC
APPROXIMATE AREA:
12.54 acres
PRESENT ZONING:
Residential -Two (R-2), Agricultural -One (A-1),
Neighborhood Commercial (NC) and Planned Commercial
Development (PCD)
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Primary Commercial Corridor, Mixed Use Commercial
ENTER INTO RECORD:
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS
ZONING ORDINANCE
DIGITAL PRESENTATION
All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear
this case.
I. REQUEST
This application is for approval of a zone change from Residential -Two (R-2), Agricultural -One
(A-1), Neighborhood Commercial (NC) and Planned Commercial Development (PCD) to Mixed
Use — Commercial (MU -C) for property located at 4600 Kipling Street.
The zone change is the first step of the process for approval for redevelopment of this site under
MU -C zoning. If approved, and prior to any construction, a conceptual site plan and a site
development plan review will be required to confirm compliance with the city zoning code and
the Architectural and Site Design Manual. These reviews would be administrative with no
additional public hearings required. A consolidation plat would be required as well.
The purpose of the rezoning is to modify the list of uses and to simplify the review and approval
for future development on the property. (Exhibit 1, Applicant Letter)
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS/PROPERTY HISTORY
The property is located at the northeast corner of W. 44u' Avenue and Kipling and includes four
vacant parcels with split zoning with four different zone districts covering the property:
Residential -Two (R-2), Agricultural -One (A-1), Neighborhood Commercial (NC) and Planned
Commercial Development (PCD). All four lots are under single ownership and the total size of
the site is approximately 12.4 acres in size. The parcel at the hard corner of 44h and Kipling is
excluded from the subject site; this property is under separate ownership and includes a fueling
station and convenience store. (Exhibit 2, Aerial Photo)
The properties that surround the subject site include a variety of land uses and zoning
designations. To the east is Pennington Elementary which is zoned R-2, and to the northeast is
Ketelsen Campers (an RV dealer) zoned PCD. Across W. 441' Avenue to the south are small
commercial properties zoned C-1. Across Kipling to the east are the Kipling Village and
Camelot Club Apartments zoned R-3 and PRD, an herbal supplement store zoned C-1, an office
building zoned NC, and a church with split zoning. (Exhibit 3, Zoning Map)
The property is flat with a four foot grade change from the west to east. There are a various
mature trees on the property which appear to be elms and cottonwoods. (Exhibit 4, Site Photos)
III. PROPOSED ZONING
The applicant is requesting the property be rezoned to Mixed Use — Commercial (MU -C). This
zone district is generally located along major commercial corridors and at community and
employment activity centers and is established to encourage medium to high density mixed use
development. In addition to residential and civic uses, it allows for a wide range of commercial
and retail uses.
Planning Commission
WZ-15-05/Anastasi
The purpose of the MU -C zone district is to create a flexible approach to land uses and to
enhance the character of the City's commercial corridors by promoting development that
accommodates a mix of land uses, is more urban in character, and is more pedestrian friendly.
The property currently has four separate zonings on it — R-2, A-1, NC and PCD.
The R-2 zoning allows single and two family dwellings. The A-1 zoning also has a limited use
list and includes single family residential and agricultural uses such as general farming, horse
stables and landscape nurseries. The NC zone district is the City's most restricted commercial
zone district allowing low impact uses such as small offices and personal services. The Planned
Development zoning on the north end generally allows C-1 uses.
The most intensive zoning on the property is the PCD with the least intensive zoning being R-2.
The following table compares the existing R-2 and PCD zoning and proposed zoning for the
property.
Development
R-2 zoning
PCD zoning
MU -C zoning
Standard
Uses
Single family
Commercial uses
Residential and
and two family
(office, service and
commercial uses
residential
retail) including
(office, service and
restaurants, fueling
retail, restaurant )
stations, RV and auto
Drive thru uses, gas
sales and service
stations and car repair
as conditional uses
Architectural
None
None specified but
Mixed Use
Standards
would have to follow
development standards
ASDM
specified in zone
district — similar to
ASDM
Max. Building Height
35'
50'
Mixed Use — 6 stories
Single use — 4 stories
Max. Lot Coverage
40%
40%
80%
Min. Landscaping
N/A
10%
Mixed use — 10%
Single use - 15%
Min. Front Setback
25'
50'
0'-20' build -to
If the rezoning is approved, the applicant would then submit for administrative plan reviews.
The concept plan review requires neighborhood notification regarding the submittal. The design
for the property would be held to the standards set forth in the zoning code and the Architectural
and Site Design Manual.
Planning Commission
WZ-15-05/Anastasi
IV. ZONE CHANGE CRITERIA
Staff has provided an analysis of the zone change criteria outlined in Section 26-112.D.2. The
Planning Commission shall base its recommendation in consideration of the extent to which the
following criteria have been met:
1. The change of zone promotes the health, safety, and general welfare of the community
and will not result in a significant adverse effect on the surrounding area.
The change of zone promotes the health, safety, and general welfare of the community and
will not result in a significant adverse effect on the surrounding area. As outlined in the table
above, the PCD and MU- C have similar development standards and permitted uses and
while there are differences in allowed uses, the general intensity of use is similar.
The property with proximity to Kipling Street would be undesirable for low density
residential development.
Staff concludes that this criterion has been met.
2. Adequate infrastructure/facilities are available to serve the types of uses allowed by the
change of zone, or the applicant will upgrade and provide such where they do not exist
or are under capacity.
All responding agencies have indicated they can serve the property with improvements
installed at the developer's expense. Prior to issuance of a building permit, an administrative
concept plan review and site development plan applications will be required and referred to
all impacted utility and service agencies
Staff concludes that this criterion has been met.
3. The Planning Commission shall also find that at least one 1 of the following conditions
exists:
a. The change of zone is in conformance, or will bring the property into conformance,
with the City of Wheat Ridge comprehensive plan goals, objectives and policies, and
other related policies or plans for the area.
Envision Wheat Ridge, the City's 2009 comprehensive plan, identifies Kipling as a primary
commercial corridor and is high on the City's list of redevelopment priorities. While a
recreation focus is further south centering around the rec center and greenbelt, this portion of
the corridor is appropriate for higher intensity uses with taller buildings and high quality
design. The interior of the site is designated as Mixed Use Commercial.
Planning Commission
WZ-15-05/Anastasi
Excerpt from Envision Wheat
Ridge Structure Plan
■Mixed-use
Commercial
A%" J
Site
Goals met with the proposal include the redevelopment and reinvestment of underutilized
commercial areas with denser, high quality development.
Staff concludes that this criterion has been met.
b. The existing zone classification currently recorded on the official zoning maps of the
City of Wheat Ridge is in error.
Staff has not found any evidence of an error with the current zoning designations as they
appear on the City are zoning maps.
Staff concludes that this criterion is not applicable.
c. A change of character in the area has occurred or is occurring to such a degree that
it is in the public interest to encourage redevelopment of the area or to recognize the
changing character of the area.
Commercial development along the Kipling Street corridor continues to intensify with
new redevelopment of and reinvestment in tired, outdated structures and sites. Examples
of this newer construction include the GreenHerb building located 4585 Kipling
completed in 2013, the new Vitamin Cottage at 9500 W. 49u' Avenue and the Kipling
Ridge development at the southwest corner of Kipling and 38th Avenue, both of which
were completed in 2015.
Kipling is a state highway, is classified as a Principal Arterial and carries over 41,000
vehicle trips per day. As such, the use of the property as low density residential is not
desirable.
Planning Commission
WZ-15-05/Anastasi
The city is in the process of installing a 10' wide multi -use trail from 32°d Avenue north
to 44th Avenue. Redevelopment of this site will result in extension of this trail to the
northern perimeter of the property supporting the goal of increased pedestrian and
bicycle connections.
A zone change will consolidate the zoning on the property and prepare it for
redevelopment. The redevelopment of this parcel could act as a catalyst for additional
redevelopment and property investment in the area.
Staff concludes that this criterion has been met.
d. The proposed rezoning is necessary in order to provide for a community need that
was not anticipated at the time of the adoption of the City of Wheat Ridge
comprehensive plan.
The Comprehensive Plan recognizes the need for upgraded commercial space and
alternative housing options.
The rezoning to Mixed Use will aid in the progress to develop the property which will
then provide services and goods to residents of Wheat Ridge and commuters along the I-
70 corridor. The rezone also aids in the assemblage of the land under one zone district
which will promote the marketability of the property to developers. .
Staff concludes that this criterion has been met.
Staff concludes that the criteria used to evaluate zone change support this request.
V. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING
Prior to submittal of an application for a zone change, the applicant is required to hold a
neighborhood input meeting in accordance with the requirements of section 26-109.
A meeting for neighborhood input was held on October 28, 2014. Roughly 20 persons were in
attendance. Discussion topics are addressed in the neighborhood meeting notes. (Exhibit 5
Neighborhood Meeting Notes)
VI. AGENCY REFERRAL
All affected service agencies were contacted for comment on the zone change request and
regarding the ability to serve the property. Specific referral responses follow:
Arvada Fire Protection District: Can serve the property with improvements installed at the
developer's expense to be assessed at the time of site plan review.
Valley Water District: Can serve the property.
Planning Commission
WZ-15-05/Anastasi
Wheat Ridge Economic Development: The Economic Development division and Urban
Renewal fully supports the re -zone application. The zone change does not conflict with the
Kipling Corridors Urban Renewal Plan and therefore meets all the goals and objectives of the
plan.
Wheat Ridge Public Works: A drainage plan and traffic report will be required to be reviewed
as part of the concept and site plan processes.
Xcel Energy: No objections.
Comments received relate only to the zone change request. A separate referral process would be
required in the future if the zone change is approved and a site plan is submitted.
VII. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION
Staff concludes that the proposed zone change promotes the health, safety and general welfare of
the community. Staff further concludes that the proposal is consistent with the goals and
objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The zone change will consolidate zoning on the property
and prepare it for redevelopment. Redevelopment of the property may serve as a catalyst for
other property redevelopment or improvements in the area
Because the zone change evaluation criteria support the zone change request, staff recommends
approval of Case No. WZ-15-05.
VIII. SUGGESTED MOTIONS
Option A:
"I move to recommend APPROVAL of Case No. WZ-15-05, a request for approval of a zone
change from Residential -Two (R-2), Agricultural -One (A-1), Neighborhood Commercial (NC)
and Planned Commercial Development (PCD) to Mixed Use — Commercial (MU -C,) for
property located at 4600 Kipling Street. for the following reasons:
1. The proposed zone change will promote the public health, safety, or welfare of the
community.
2. The proposed zone change is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's
Comprehensive Plan.
3. The zone change will consolidate zoning on the property, prepare it for redevelopment
and may serve as a catalyst for other property redevelopment or improvements in the
area.
4. The criteria used to evaluate a zone change support the request."
Planning Commission
WZ-15-05/Anastasi
Option B:
"I move to recommend DENIAL of Case No. WZ-15-05, a request for approval of a zone change
from Residential -Two (R-2), Agricultural -One (A-1), Neighborhood Commercial (NC) and
Planned Commercial Development (PCD) to Mixed Use — Commercial (MU -C), for property
located at 4600 Kipling Street. for the following reasons:
Planning Commission
WZ-15-05/Anastasi
Exhibit 1— Applicant letter
Michael G. Photo Associates, LLC
July 7,2015
Ms. Motorola, Rookat Senior Plawec
City of::o Ridge
7500 Wes 29"'Avenve
WMe Ridge Cobmlo W33
Its: N Q Wen W Aoms: l Kipling
Gear Ms. Reckm:
The Purpose of Ibis letter is is debil our rtmom, mluen eM provide a arecrip0on ofths
proposal. ImIMea berein lsn resPnvzblbe su imos lia¢a nn Nes
t1gRq$�g@from onvc to llc tlueeilaoslialaf in 9c 26- 2Pnvme 0.es..fnooftheMushroomCcae,
My repuw to ro rtmne Ne pmPmy m Mhopt Um -f mspin. This should
uvlldaw tum xµuuu pert omimpr n (R-2, A-1. WC BIM PCU) wNcb art commit in
Placem Ne eumoe Pseels otNe 130.xre propep. Webwpeviowlymd WNyau
wdmcmh ofN Whe dges mahavebMaNeighMrlrod Naming,
Per ebb26_112 sabots shoscoom or Providel w Ne Muoicipl CMe, sai provide the
611nwingresgm.
£I. 7M1e tlmµx I=on/somwes rh beoflAeafeYunEemla=al waif
o/iM cmmwfo and will ro/room In o sign onru am," effect
on)M surrouMing arta;
We hliew Ne Wlimm mull afAi$ re g poll be a pmilive elect on be simmering
uw As mor, dw pmpmly, is almost uokvelopable given Ne nature of the mtrelnM
v I
award
to ifiuliam'. Reavoing Ncpmpvryb MUCwillryovideauoilmnmoraescall
NemMium-m-higherimwitY load urz oppawitioaloNM
oby Ocw
aieV
utaiel ocwon.
E3 AEegvae inJ nvnme ilirier are awilodte ro.rerve his rope
proper allowed by lM charpre ofvm, or rhe goWico.r will sperms,
wdproviso rvch wheremay & nor exist or me maser empm,iry;
The popeoryis wellswMwiN mistingwmersntl senimryxxerwvice. Wemlicipte
EmomequIri ,c will Air xNNeehnduvea on thegapeny. gMWd o6ai¢utiliry oWgatls
eiwyionazn9uirM, SUlmmdiolgmaial loMa on Ne
endmuNpmmay Ip: aeesallmed boom
script
crip We Avenue cipia atom jo, ob
CWT SMtazcess too
rood hom W Wcetas pins thisKipling, We M1opeb
M Ale to defive the pnnary inlenW mMWignmem ev pan ofWamuniog
7777 swxlxoe. vum nnrNo CuIomm laths ph. hay.luanl
Inasuuug Coranasa on
W&15-05/Anastasi
F3 At(emtone feMfN(owNg tnMlflaueruG,
o. ties nota =one Is in mnfwmaxe, or wal bnn%/Mpoperry
twocoo imam WlbM Ery ftl'hem AldA mngveMNlw
Plain 5odq objectives pJieiei mNmker COs, ngwoved
mNkiesmdav kr xx men
e tries existing:orc na xjrcmbn evneNty eemrdedan one fcel
,m,Ngmro, fN, into of Boost gNg, am
c Achage ofeMvl(o in eM rose Ms occurred. ae is oeevmrg to
suet adegree(M(/ I/ in his pith, Interest b enconsi
redecelopment oflbe rose or to""notr, Me changing eharacrer
ofthe
d IMyro allwng is recessroy in order lopmrideforarommeniy
redtb/xws lot oNicipvttd as rise time a fire adopion fthe Cot
ofWbevt Refire weMVlredu
Without douh Nis rewrwgmN bWe lmgue¢eofE3A. Thenrofium-u.-A:�ee
mrmiry IeMu�e, Cit Wu rewrtioseweW allow is inapoemty insto n. Nassgals
eMobjecdnsiveines PontMiry far lents Imhd&her i Wong to sity mwluay amdots The City's
Comprehnsive Pa Milan amiss, Niue,-bFippnin@nsiryrnidemiel, oiTx entl reuiluw
M Jl paniansofWe pnopetty
The Ciry'sst 'ng Alas is not in mm, bit it Mircmn WeaWmmeoaorcd ciseekeMud
mrring jesterncurrently in place. One might sign, Ntl a ensign of corrosion isc¢unitg
inllmuw This,fang ie enifeeletl Nthnf t nasi shoran FYfM1edevelvpmeht
wtitr. swmunaing landsmeeitherdevelopes n(art [eineam'dopW. ihamefo¢,
voun—it' mpg,. m, s,,usi siset �lop,,: prosiness . lying cmoiamml Ara
ly ofresideniM a rd mmmereiel4velnPen. nitrites Wetm in Writers of Nis
Property include wnvderuiw of a"Acrwn rcsuuratn asset an animal alsicOcspits.
lleseisesshouldke ideNnmme "mficipmed Weerevotawareofimoe&by
shoe, won motor awi,i,, mooting prvvma,lp w o¢azn.
Tile s hruttal CICKWIVA, doers C11M.0 form lists vx items to be Mistresses.
TMneedj :amcMnde. Thermed fro amieanena fnclWnuse
wnsNeretion off existing rmu5 into awntemporery mixW uce
ssme NY illaws Imsignfimr[flewoiliry in Ne mMepWs, ane
WU now Woxa a rose vWcoy Ofrmiderstd, ofice asM rtmil
nen Wish sh is wmisrmt want Ne develapmem goals of Ne City.
• PreaeN aMfurrvee$ec(or(he mulOgionedisM[(t hwloymeN
omlpJparcINchmrc(v oflM area. The psryW sod !sure eReet of
Planning Commission 10
WZIS-p5/Maztasi
the coming wrc districts is to prohibit secured development ofmr,
pmperry. Bare wowd M nor unified or cohesive cievempment of
the foreplay end Ne physivel consumer of Ne men win remuw m is.
Anne to o, 1111, r ad;emne a. ane;mpaer ltx.,.vaened_a,re
n shoseraccours. Preliminary discussions with personnel an Ne ciry'e
engmcering micartmem and sees the haRc plastics stabler COLT
conium me IikelihoW of fidl-nwvemmt intersection on Wed 11n
Avenue at the Jellison Street nligm ust and another fidl-movrnrnt
intersection on Kiplingat a comemribledi^...• wort of the Won 44%
Avmoeintcrsection. AcrcubiWividuN developmentpmelsmWd
Nbymintemelspiserwd.ideallYdnignWw&i =gecmahmugh
neR' now Je W hneltt wenW mWwnys.
• Am11aE;tlrynjvr;Ixies. �N sntereW sanimrysewuservim fie
available from mea pmviders N n capwiy, capable of supporting
medium to high-development intmsitie, on flit propefry. Exterior;
lion IowW in the Paimecer arnmeat rights of way mill be exrmini
two the properly as IuirW
• Present andJarun effect on vaefiefacllu;es aMservlces. neem
Arc, policeworse taMmnon..m mmee, pro s Imola, ere.
At be, present timesirh Ne properly undeveloped there isviNWly
no eRxt on public service provides. Oevcbpment of me 12.4-vire
Pmpnry will genmte a lower level of regweN public service which
wed have minimal impact on the serious cemce provider
• A discussion ofrhe relanowhip Issomen rhepwpowl andaMpend
IarMand/ior po(lHnv
of the ally, OevebPmem obese pmpenY for
mNium-whigher intensity moderated, oRme or must lend ones
s
consissual with Ne pmwnr duel. and eNectiveM
s efNe City. T
proposed MGC zone nm only provides for dm deshnble lard use
rypea bW Ow reforms various site end lend pe design wmpoomme
dlppNW by Ne City.
Plnx In on, some if ea,I to do more nr pMMde WGdrumd information at Nis rimc.
V iY.
beet G. Pbnm
MGPhp
c: Lloyd Aracusi
Manning Commission
W&15-05/Maztasi
Exhibit 2 —Aerial Map
Planning Commission 12
WZ15-05/Anash si
Exhibit 3 —Zoning Map
Planning Commission 13
WZ15-05/A aAasi
Exhibit 4 — Site Photos
Looking northwest at
fueling station on the
corner of 44a` and
Kipling
Looking north from
West 44a` Avenue
Planning Commission 14
WZ-15-05/Anastasi
Looking north from
West 44t` Avenue
Looking west on 44t`
towards Kipling
Planning Commission 15
WZ-15-05/Anastasi
Planning Commission
WZ-15-05/Anastasi
Looking east from
Kipling Street
Looking east from
Kipling Street
16
Looking north toward
Kipling from 44a`
Avenue
Planning Commission 17
WZ-15-05/Anastasi
Exhibit 6 — Neighborhood Meeting Notes
J W�ewow�tEMG�
co,aa,
airorwn..�a�epw m.mnwi eailemn spow.2o Aw evowmag.CD 8033MI r. mrvs.un a.amnss
NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTES
MeetNg Data: One6m28, 2014
Animating Staff. Meredith RUYeM1 Senior Plamier
Steve M, Emnomic Development Metmg+
Location of Mewing: What Ridge Municipal Building
Simard four mufmm«:mm
75CO W. 29"Avrnue
Wheet Bitlge, CO
Propeop Address: PmperrygenrnllY addressMm ON Kipling.Northeast
Wracrofli?, 40 Avenue and Kipling Ours including
4590, ON, and 4650 KiplingaM owner IarJ (PM 39 222-
09-018)
Properly Ownerys): Lloyd Amounts,
NationsPxoerOl Moment' No
sapless ear: Mika Poom
Email: win
PMne: 303-783-3772
7n7 Depen Sumn
Littleson, CO 83128
Esising Zonlism Planned Commercial Development WCD),A,cullurel-
Ou(A-1), NeighWrhuM Commercial NU. and
Residential -T , DR -2).
gaining Comp. Mae: Mimi Use Commercid, Primary Commaeiel Candor,
Neighrmhoud Commercial Cement
Existing She Condlllons: The property is Insured an Ne northeast roma of W.4Pn Avenue and Kipling
and includes four summit parcelsxth split swung with four di eat zone disNcD Water Oe
property: Planned Commercial Development (PCD), Agdaltmal-One (A-1), NeiahMshoud
Commercial (NC), and Residential -Two Mt 2). All fou Ions are wader single ownership and the foal
eudededne is approximsite, put acrce in size. The parcel auhe hap mmaof e; a foe Kipling is
excludes from the wblecr site, this property is urdasepamteownasllip and include; a NelinB season
and mnveumn arore.
Flamung commlad on 18
WZ 15-05/Anastasi
TM1e Peanuts that snnomd He vnbiect site mclWe a ensure of Ind uses and arming Alemannic To
the east is Pennington Elementary which is zoned R-2, and to Ne northeast is loselsen Campers tun RV
deaden zome'1 PCO. Acmw W. sit Accurate the south are small wmmemlal lmperge zoned C-1.
Aures Klplingm the sent arethe Ruffner Village and Camelot Club Annua s nand Rd cold PRD, an
heNel supplement store zsnN C-% an ogee building zoned NC, and a chu¢h with split zoning.
APWcant/Owner PretlMoary Proposal:
Theapplieantupmpaingmracememeintimpmpwyto Mixed Un Commacial(MU-C) Thee Isro
specific develation boos inflamed ',Has time. Thepuryemafthewnechwgeistocmnolidatethe
zoning and prepare for %tum decelungedt.
The follwbig is a summary of the neigbborhood meeting:
• In addition as staff. 19 members of me public aMnded the neighborhood medius
•
Staff explained the site conditions, zoning in Ne undisorhsd, and the mourn fortberezonittg
regular.
• The members of the public were informed of the reason for a zm¢change.
• The mambas of the public were informed oftheir psom iry TO make comments during the banks
and at Ne public Intends.
• Neighbor compared the proposed dwign to a precious'muhi-hmily development and were more
receptive the sergeant's single Armily replaced. Concerns were re1sM to drainage. prcarvarion of
,sitting noes, Mainland "His on W. 44's and Kipling and So imM arcing.
The fouowNg Issues were discussed re Miog the zone change requert and propend development:
How will escape to Kipling be determined? Niahmicoasmahoder ands vndficimPaRsmay
vill be reasoned to be submitted to TM1e Gry and COOTto determine access into IM tile. Iris Nie/y
plovers,
there wi// ss o an ass A oenueimfiomocatedaw asjx-0(besi ve thedmn t else -Point aJrXe
Properly. Amro /win 44° N'enve w(ll rq (scaled carona from Jellison Slreemn the taal5
Whorypeaofumartbangp Wp fwtbeproperty., TM1eproposedzone.hums, would Ee to
are.. We Commercial whicAollaws bwX residenllal andrommercial (and wan TM1e Property
isbilateral ovl fslale vM is mIrlate roledin deve(vprm il. Neem/d(iMmobmin
molidvledzommazon theprolneryond asuldhere solaria msomesneeim who imi ddion
develop It
Will Renewal Wheat Ridge get involvN in the developmenC Not unless the deceloper is colo or
folOwne m,l "Inver eo-looearlyi meproe'e.nmbmw.
Does; staff think that be Pmpeny is appropriate for residetid developmente Nm unlns oke
someenlivl wits rare ofshe lot m oPimary mmmercial me an a seroM/evader on rhe earzemside
afiFe soulFern portion c/iM1e loin
A women with a Mme on I depend',¢ Stan expteesN cement that new construction on the
parcel will block her view arms mountains. How tall can buildingsbe in the Mixed -Use
Commercial zone disWe?Buildings that how a mix ofines(relai/andrenidenz/a/ erg), ore a//oared
v e,ar%usour houcrvredsocal ea zAar M1ave ontyane ose con Fzsix Hones in M1e/gM1z Irishman,
ProPertv will Issued soon moment stories because opera in I enough
iandarea. The ',Its, the buOdng the more spimmmvlvge and moreparkng is re9uired
Planning Comntisaon 19
W&15-05/Anastaa
Are there other agents than wingto mixed use? Ona the mningappmval is p,me there is no
opportunity for neighWbotd open?
Thu'Awieem rouldaTabs lis a"" shange to Planned Commercial Development burn it a more
rigornw Mason due to place (or dew opmem required as part of fhe ry66'e hearings.
Are manjuane busitessa allowd in mixed on aming?
Mantuan businesses we art allowed In Me wood we zoning deaden.
has the twant owner held the pop;.ni
It win noted that new devetopmenton the pmperie mny bave a positive impM on some undesirable uses
Nnher to the north.
Sniff received no wA¢n comment prior to the neighborhood meeting.
PhM,gCommis...
WL15 05fAw.hsi
Planning Commission 21
WZ-15-05/Anastasi
♦,��
City of
Wheatlk* ge
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission CASE MANAGER: Lauren Mikulak
DATE OF MEETING: October 1, 2014
CASE NO. & NAME: WZ-15-07 / Read King
ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a zone change from Mixed Use -Neighborhood (MU -N) to Mixed
Use -Commercial (MU -C)
LOCATION OF REQUEST
APPLICANT(S):
PROPERTY OWNER(S):
APPROXIMATE AREA:
3790 Wadsworth Boulevard
Read King Medical Development
K&B Management LLC
41,624 Square Feet (0.96 Acres)
PRESENT ZONING:
Mixed Use -Neighborhood (MU -N)
PRESENT LAND USE:
Gas station with convenience store and carwash
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Primary Commercial Corridor
ENTER INTO RECORD:
(X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
(X) ZONING ORDINANCE (X) DIGITAL PRESENTATION
LOCATION MAP
Care No. WZ15-07/Readhrng 1
All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case.
I. REQUEST
Case No. WZ-15-07 is an application by Read King Medical Development requesting approval of a
zone change from Mixed Use -Neighborhood (MU -N) to Mixed Use -Commercial (MU -C) for property
located at 3790 Wadsworth Boulevard (gxhihit.
The proposed rezoning area includes one parcel, the total area of which is approximately 0.96 acres.
The purpose of the zone change is to better align the zoning with the location of the property and to
expand possible uses for the site including redevelopment for a freestanding emergency room.
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use
The property is located at the southeast corner of W. 38th Avenue and Wadsworth. Surrounding
properties include a variety of land uses and zoning designations With the
exception of the subject site, all three corners of the intersection at Wadsworth and W. 38Avenue are
zoned Mixed Use -Commercial (MU -C). To the north, across W. 38th Avenue, is the Safeway shopping
center. To the northwest is the Wilmore Center which includes a variety of retail and service uses. To
the west is the vacant Ford dealership slated to be redeveloped with a mix of uses including retail and
restaurant tenants at the hard corner.
To the east of the subject site is the Wheat Ridge United Methodist Church which is zoned MU -N.
Smaller properties to the south along Wadsworth include a single-family home zoned Restricted
Commercial, and two offices for a pharmaceutical organization and an architect.
Subject Property
The subject property has access on two street frontages, including a curb cut on Wadsworth near the
south property line and a curb cut on W. 38th Avenue at the far eastern edge of the property. The site
was platted in 1990 as the Texaco Minor Subdivision
The site currently includes a Shell fueling station with a convenience store and car wash all of which
was developed in 1989. The convenience store is located in the middle of the site with fueling
canopies to the north and south of store. The carwash is located on the eastern side of the site. The
current development is considered legally nonconforming as it does not meet current standards for site
design, building design, landscaping, signage, etcetera
III. PROPOSED ZONING
The applicant is requesting to rezone the property to Mixed Use -Commercial (MU -C), a zone district
that is intended for primary commercial corridors. The zone district allows for a wide range of land
uses including commercial, residential, and civic uses. If the rezoning is approved, the applicant will
be seeking to redevelop the site for a freestanding emergency room facility (Exhibit 4, Letter of
CaseNo. WZ-15-07/ReadKing
Any redevelopment of the site under a mixed use zone district would be reviewed as part of a separate
land use application. Site Plan Review is an administrative process that confirms compliance of new
development with the mixed use design standards.
The subject site is unique because it is the only corner of the intersection at Wadsworth and W. 38th
Avenue that is not zoned MU -C. The reason for the MU -N zoning on the subject site is not reflective
of its suitability for MU -C, but rather is reflective of the legislative process through which the two
adjacent corridors were rezoned.
The mixed use zone districts were established in the municipal code through a code amendment in
2010. Subsequent to the creation of the zone districts, Planning Commission and City Council
reviewed city -initiated zone changes for the Wadsworth and 38th Avenue corridors. It was determined
at that time that the logical boundaries for these legislative rezonings would be similar to the
boundaries of the respective urban renewal areas �rRA and ZOaM.
The MU -C zone district was created for primary commercial corridors such as Wadsworth and
Kipling, and the rezoning of the Wadsworth Corridor to MU -C was approved in July 2011. As shown
in Exhibit 5, the southeast corner of the intersection is part of the 38th Avenue Urban Renewal Area,
and as such it was not considered at the time for inclusion in the MU -C zone change
The MU -N zone district is generally located along neighborhood main streets and at neighborhood
commercial centers. The zone district allows a variety of land uses including residential, civic, and a
limited range of neighborhood -serving commercial and retail uses. In October 2012, the 38th Avenue
corridor including the subject site was rezoned to MU -N.
Given that the subject property is adjacent to Wadsworth Boulevard, the MU -C zoning designation is
appropriate at this location. Although new development is not being reviewed as part of the zone
change, the applicant does intend to redevelop the site in the future. The following table compares the
proposed and existing standards that would apply.
From a design standpoint the MU -N and MU -C zone districts are virtually the same. The most
significant difference between the MU -N and MU -C zone districts on this site are the permitted uses.
The MU -C zoning will accommodate the proposed use of a freestanding emergency room which
operates 24 hours a day. Staff has determined that it is more appropriate to classify the proposed use
as a hospital versus a medical office building. A hospital is a conditional use in MU -C and is not
permitted in MU -N.
MUsesAllows
new residential, commercial,
or mixed uses — allows hospital uses
with a conditional use permit
Allows new residential, commercial,
or mixed uses — allows medical
office but does not allow hospital
Architectural Standards
Determined by mixed use code
same
Building Height (max)
35 feet if building has residential use
50 feet for all other buildings
same
CaseNo. WZ-15-07/ReadKing
Build -to Area
0-20 feet (applies to north and west
0-12 feet (applies to north and west
(along front lot line)
frontages)
frontages)
Setbacks
South: 5 feet
same
East: 0 feet
Lot Coverage (max)
90% for mixed use
same
85% for single use
Landscape / Open Space
10% for mixed use
same
(min)
15% for single use
IV. ZONE CHANGE CRITERIA
Staff has provided an analysis of the zone change criteria outlined in section 26-122.E. The Planning
Commission shall base its recommendation in consideration of the extent to which the following
criteria have been met:
1. The change of zone promotes the health, safety, and general welfare of the community and
will not result in a significant adverse effect on the surrounding area.
The change of zone promotes the health, safety, and general welfare of the community and will not
result in a significant adverse effect on the surrounding area As outlined in the section above, the
existing and proposed zone districts have very similar development standards. The MU -C zone
district will expand land use options, but it is appropriate to allow a wider range of uses given the
site's adjacency to Wadsworth Boulevard.
Staff concludes that this criterion has been met.
2. Adequate infrastructure/facilities are available to serve the types of uses allowed by the
change of zone, or the applicant will upgrade and provide such where they do not exist or are
under capacity.
Adequate infrastructure currently serves the existing gas station. Prior to future redevelopment, a
Site Plan Review application will be required. That application will include a referral to all service
providers. In the event that current capacity is not adequate, the property owner/developer will be
responsible for utility upgrades.
Staff concludes that this criterion has been met.
3. The Planning Commission shall also find that at least one 1 of the following conditions
exists:
a. The change of zone is in conformance, or will bring the property into conformance, with
the City of Wheat Ridge comprehensive plan goals, objectives and policies, and other
related policies or plans for the area.
CaseNo. WZ-15-07/ReadKing
The proposed zoning is consistent with the policies and goals of the City's 2009 comprehensive
planEnvisionWheat Ridge—and with the Wadsworth and 38th Avenue corridor plans. The
comprehensive plan designates Wadsworth as a primary commercial corridor and calls for high
quality mixed use development in this area. The 38th Avenue corridor plan recognizes that the
intersection at Wadsworth is more auto -
oriented in nature where more intensive and
regionally -oriented land uses may be
appropriate.
The image to the right shows the location of
the subject site (in bright blue) relative to the
Structure Plan in Envision Wheat Ridge. The
site is located along a Primary Commercial
Corridor designation and adjacent to the Town
Center and Main Street designations.
The proposed MU -C zoning is appropriate for
this location in the City.
Staff concludes that this criterion has been met
b. The existing zone classification currently recorded on the official zoning maps of the City
of Wheat Ridge is in error.
Staff has not found any evidence of an error with the current Mixed Use -Neighborhood zoning
designation as it appears on the City's zoning maps.
Staff concludes that this criterion is not applicable.
c. A change of character in the area has occurred or is occurring to such a degree that it is
in the public interest to encourage redevelopment of the area or to recognize the changing
character of the area.
There is no evidence of any significant changes in the area. The zone change request from
MU -N to MU -C is appropriate given the location of the site, but is not directly related to
changes in the neighborhood's character.
Staff concludes that this criterion is not applicable.
d. The proposed rezoning is necessary in order to provide for a community need that was
not anticipated at the time of the adoption of the City of Wheat Ridge comprehensive
plan.
The proposed rezoning does not relate to an unanticipated need.
Staff concludes that this criterion is not applicable.
CaseNo. WZ-15-07/ReadKing
V. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING
Prior to submittal of an application for a zone change, the applicant was required to hold a
neighborhood input meeting in accordance with the requirements of Section 26-109 of the city code.
A meeting for neighborhood input was held on August 12, 2015. Two property owners from the
neighborhood attended the meeting and each expressed support for the rezoning and reinvestment
being proposed
VI. AGENCY REFERRAL
All affected service agencies were contacted for comment on the zone change request and regarding
the ability to serve the property. Specific referral responses follow:
Wheat Ridge Public Works: No concerns; drainage plans will be reviewed with Site Plan.
Wheat Ridge Economic Development: No concerns; supportive of reuse.
Wheat Ridge Fire District: No concerns; specific site requirements will be reviewed with Site
Plan.
Wheat Ridge Sanitation District: No concerns; applicant will be responsible for any
necessary infrastructure upgrades.
Wheat Ridge Water District: No concerns; applicant will be responsible for any necessary
infrastructure upgrades.
Xcel Energy: No concerns, contingent upon maintaining all rights to existing infrastructure.
CDOT: No concerns; any change in access will be reviewed with Site Plan.
No comments were received from Comcast or Century Link. Referral recipients are advised that no
comment received indicates having no objections or concerns regarding the proposal.
A separate referral process will be required in the future if redevelopment occurs.
VII. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION
Staff concludes that the proposed zone change promotes the health, safety and general welfare of the
community and will not result in a significant adverse effect on the surrounding area Staff further
concludes that utility infrastructure adequately serves the property, and the applicant will be
responsible for upgrades, as needed, if development is proposed in the future. Finally, staff concludes
that the zone change is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in which the site is part of a primary
commercial corridor.
Because the zone change evaluation criteria support the zone change request, staff recommends
approval of the request.
CaseNo. WZ-15-07/ReadKing
VIII. SUGGESTED MOTIONS
Option A:
"I move to recommend APPROVAL of Case No. WZ-15-07, a request for approval of a zone change
from Mixed Use -Neighborhood to Mixed Use -Commercial, for property located at 3790 Wadsworth
Boulevard, for the following reasons:
1. The proposed zone change will not adversely impact the public health, safety, or welfare.
2. The proposed zone change is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's
Comprehensive Plan.
3. The proposed zone change is compatible with the surrounding area.
4. The zone change criteria support the request."
Option B:
"I move to recommend DENIAL of Case No. WZ-15-07, a request for approval of a zone change from
Mixed Use -Neighborhood to Mixed Use -Commercial, for property located at 3790 Wadsworth
Boulevard, for the following reasons:
1.
2.
CaseNo. WZ-15-07/ReadKing
EXHIBIT 2: ZONING MAP
'the subject property is outlived in blue in the image below
36THAVE `
36
CasrM Wts�, dKng
EXHIBIT 3: SITE PHOTOS
Ca e No. WZ15-07/ReadSing 10
Read King
August 19, 2015
Lauren E Mikulak, AICP, Senior Planner
City of Wheat Ridge
7500 West 29th Ave
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
EXHIBIT 4:
LETTER OF REQUEST
Re: RKMS Wheat Ridge, LLC.
Southeast Corner of Wadsworth Blvd and 38th Ave.
Dear Lauren,
Please allow this letter to serve as our zoning change request and brief description of the property.
Below is our response to the Private Rezone Criteria for review and the Zone Change Application
Checklist.
Read King Medical Development is proposing to develop, an approximate 8,400 square foot single
story Free Standing Emergency Department on the 0.96 acre parcel of land at the SE corner of
Wadsworth Blvd & 38th Ave. The site will also contain parking for the building, landscaping around
the building, and a landscaped buffer zone between neighboring properties as per our previous Pre
Application meeting on July 9th 2015.
The property is currently zoned Mix Use - Neighborhood, MU -N. The proposed medical facility is a
24hr a day facility and its hours of operation are not allowed in this zone. We are requesting a rezone
to Mixed Use - Commercial, MU -C, to allow for this facilities hours of operation.
The application for rezone has 6 points of why a rezone would be justified for this property.
The need for a zone change. Our property sits at a vital intersection of two major roadway
improvement plans, The Wadsworth Boulevard Corridor Redevelopment Plan and the 38th
Avenue Corridor Redevelopment Plan. Rezoning this property would allow the intersection
to have one uniform zoning code. Redevelopment would also allow for the property to meet
the new corridors pedestrian access and urban form standards that these two new plans try
to accomplish.
- Present and future effect on the existing zone districts, development and physical character of
the area. As previously stated the zone districts in this area are not continuous. A rezone
would allow for cohesive planning along these two corridors. Redevelopment also allows the
project to physically meet the standards of the new zone such as build to lines, landscape
requirements, pedestrian access, and street frontage requirements.
Access to the area, traffic patterns and impact of the requested zone on these factors. Both
Wadsworth and 38Th have adequate capacity for the traffic generated by our facility and
our proposed facility will maintain existing curb cuts along both roadways in order to
maintain existing traffic patterns. The MU -C zone also includes parking maximums that
are designed to reduce demand on local roadway capacity.
- Availability ofutilities. Currently the site has adequate utilities in water, sewer, power,
storm water, and gas. Any modifications to these utilities will be modified on site and
the public infrastructure should not be required to be modified.
Present and future effect on public facilities and services, such as fire, police, water, sanitation,
roadways, parks, schools, etc. The rezone of the property to MU- C will not have any negative
effects on the surrounding community or public services. The redevelopment of the property
would remove the current gas station and its potential environmental issues and would
provide a medical facility that provides a public health service to the community.
- A discussion of the relationship between the proposal and adopted land and or policies of the
city. Changing to a MU- C zone is consistent and in line with the goals of the two major
thoroughfare plans that intersect at this property. The MU -N serves more of residential
function for planning purposes and the MU -C is more in line with the commercial feel to the
two major streets.
Best,
Matthew Camp AIA
Read King Medical Development
CaseNo. WZ-15-07/ReadKing 12
EXHIBIT 4: URA & ZONING
In the image below, the Wadsworth and Times Square Urban Renewal Areas (URAs) are outlined in
black and generally coincide with the Nlixed Use -Commercial W-C)zoning. The 38r Avenue
Urban Renewal Area is outlined in white.
The subject site is circled in red at the southeast comer of Wadsworth and 38r Avenue. Because it is
not part of the Wadsworth or Times Square URAs it was not considered for N -C zoning in 2011. It
was therefore rezoned to N -N as part of the 2012 rezoning of the 381h Avenue condor.
MseN¢ UT IS07IRead Kwg
EXHIBIT 6: NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTES
NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTES
Meeting Date: August 12, 2015
Attending Staff: Lauren Mikulak, Senior Planner
Location of Meeting: City Hall — 7500 W. 29"' Avenue
Property Address: 3790 Wadsworth Boulevard
Property Owner: K&B Management LLC
Property Owner Present? No
Applicant: Read King Commercial Real Estate
Blake Propst
Matthew Camp
Applicant Present? Yes
Existing Zoning: Mixed Use -Neighborhood (MU -N)
Existing Comp. Plan: Mixed Use Town Center, Primary Commercial Corridor,
Neighborhood Commercial Corridor
Existing Site Conditions:
The property is located at the southeast corner of W. 38th Avenue and Wadsworth and currently
consists of a Shell fueling station, convenience store and car wash. Based on Jefferson County
records, the parcel is approximately 0.96 acres in size. The current zoning is Mixed Use -
Neighborhood (MU -N).
The properties that surround the subject site are primarily commercial, with a variety of land uses and
zoning designations. To the north, across W. 38th Avenue, the property is zoned MU -C and consists
of the Wheat Ridge Marketplace, anchored by a Safeway grocery store. To the east is the Wheat Ridge
United Methodist Church with MU -N zoning. To the west, across Wadsworth Blvd, the property is
zoned Mixed Use -Commercial (MU -C) and consists of the proposed Corners at Wheat Ridge
development. To the north and west of the subject property, across W. 38th Avenue and Wadsworth
Blvd, is a commercial development zoned MU -C and platted as The Wilmore Center. Immediately
south of the subject property is a small property with RC zoning that contains a small single family
residence. Extending beyond these properties, the zoning consists of varied commercial zones along
Wadsworth Blvd, MU -N zoning along W. 38th Avenue, and various residential zones within the
neighborhoods.
CaseNo. WZ-15-07/ReadKing 14
The property has access on both street frontages, including a curb cut on Wadsworth Blvd near the
southern property line of approximately 34 feet in width. An additional curb cut is located on W. 38th
Avenue along the eastern property line of approximately 32 feet in width. The property is platted as
the Texaco Minor Subdivision, consisting of the one subject property.
Applicant/Owner Preliminary Proposal:
The applicant is proposing to rezone the property to Mixed Use -Commercial (MU -C). The purpose of
the zone change is to allow a free standing emergency room to locate on the site following demolition
of the existing structures.
The applicants' propose a business model that follows a trend of small, decentralized medical facilities.
Typically, the applicant's client, Neighbors Emergency Center & ER, partners with an area hospital,
which can provide the patient a full range of diagnostic and treatment services if patient needs cannot
be met within the freestanding emergency room facility. Ambulance service will transport the patient
to a larger facility, if necessary. Typically, an ambulance will not transport patients to the free
standing emergency room, rather they arrive in private vehicles as with urgent care facilities. Patients
can remain at the proposed emergency center for no more than 23 hours.
The following is a summary of the neighborhood meeting:
• In addition to the applicant and staff, two members of the public were in attendance Paul Battista
and Roger Loecher both of whom own property along Wadsworth.
• Support for the project was expressed. Questions were primarily related to the future development
of the site.
• Staff discussed the site, its zoning and future land use.
• The applicant discussed the reasons for the zone change request, and they described the operations
of the medical facility.
• The applicant and members of the public were informed of the process for a zone change.
• The members of the public were informed of their opportunity to make comments during the
process and at the public hearing, if required.
The following issues were discussed regarding the SUP request and proposed development:
Do you have a site plan?
No, the applicants are working to prepare a site plan, but site design is not a required
submittal for rezoning to a mixed use district. If the rezoning is approved, the site plan and
building elevations will be reviewed in a separate process after the zone change.
Is any ROW dedication required?
The Wadsworth PEL study has identified ROW needs along the entire corridor. There is
already an unusually wide right-of-way width adjacent the subject property because the wide
right -turn lane. It is likely that right-of-way will still be required and this would be assessed
more specifically during the site plan review.
Will the building be located close to the street?
CaseNo. WZ-15-071ReadKing 15
Yes, the mixed use zone districts have a build -to requirement instead of setbacks. The building
will be at the hard corner.
• How many of these facilities has Read King opened?
Their facilities have primarily been located in Texas, but they are expanding into other markets
including in Colorado. There are 9 open in Texas, 10 proposed to open this year, and 17
proposed to open next year.
• Does Read King specialize in medical facilities?
They offer a wide range of services, but one of their clients is Neighborhood Medical Partners
so they have specialized in these types offacilities. Both Read King representatives are
architects by training.
• What is the applicant's timeline?
They are hoping to move as efficiently as possible and expect to start the site plan review as
soon as possible after the zone change move forward.
• Is the gas station property under individual or corporate ownership?
The property is currently owned by an individual.
• Have the applicants purchased the property?
They are under contract to purchase the property.
Aside from the two neighbors at the meeting, staff received no comment from others in the area
regarding the proposal.
CaseNo. WZ-15-071ReadKing 16