Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWA-15-10♦�Ij City of " �ComMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 291h Ave. November 20, 2015 Caroline Mallory and Charlotte Kettering 4001 Marshall Street Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Dear Ms. Mallory and Ms. Kettering: RE: Case No. WA -15-10 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 Please be advised that at its meeting of October 22, 2015 the Board of Adjustment APPROVED your request of a 360 square foot variance from the permitted size of 600 square feet for an accessory building located at 3615 Teller Street in the Residential —Three (R-3) zone district for the following reasons: 1. There are unique conditions of lot size and variability within the neighborhood which will result in an accessory structure that is compatible with the surrounding area and the existing home. The proposed garage will appear incidental to the home, and significant property investment will occur as a result of approval of the variance. 2. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. 3. The alleged hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. 4. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare. 5. No objections were received regarding the variance request. 6. There was positive neighborhood testimony given. 7. The proposed investment is consistent with the Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy and other documents supported by the city that encourage property improvements. Enclosed are copies of the Certificate of Resolutions, as well as a draft copy of the minutes, stating the Board's decision. Please feel free to contact me at (303) 235-2846 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Tammy Odean Administrative Assistant Enclosures: Certificates of Resolution Draft of Minutes cc: WA -15-10 (case file) WA1510.doc ,6v w w.ci.wheatridge.co.us 1. City of Wheat Rdge BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Minutes of Meeting October 22, 2015 CALL MEETING TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chair HOVLAND at 7:01 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the Municipal Building, 7500 West 29`" Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. 2. ROLL CALL Board Members Present 3. 4. Alternates Present: Board Members Absent Staff Members Present: PUBLIC FORUM No one wished to speak at this time. Thomas Abbott Sally Banghart Janet Bell Paul Hovland David Kuntz Betty Jo Page Dan Bradford Michael Griffeth Lily Griego Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner Lisa Ritchie, Planner I1 Tammy Odean, Recording Secretary Ms. Reckert introduced the two new staff employees, Lisa Ritchie, Planner II and Tammy Odean, Administrative Assistant. PUBLIC HEARING A. Case No.WA-15-10 The case was presented by Lisa Ritchie. She entered the contents of the case file, packet materials, the zoning ordinance and the digital presentation into the record. She stated all appropriate notification and posting requirements have been met and advised the board there was jurisdiction to hear the case. She reviewed the presentation and staff report. Board of Adjustment Minutes — October 22, 2015 The applicant is requesting approval of a 360 -square foot (60%) variance from the 600 - square foot maximum size standard to allow a 960 -square foot detached garage located at 3615 Teller Street. Staff recommends approval of this variance. Member ABBOTT had an academic question related to the staff recommendation; is the proposed investment consistent with the Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy (NRS) and other documents supported by the city that encourage property improvements. He mentioned it is recommended in the following case, but not this one. Ms. Ritchie stated it would apply in this case also. Member BANGHART asked that if the garage were to be attached to the house there wouldn't be a need for a variance. Ms. Ritchie stated that is true, but the owners want to maximize solar orientation and not get rid of windows by attaching a garage to the house. Member ABBOTT asked that if the maximum square footage for an accessory building in R-1 is 1000 sq. ft. as opposed to a maximum square footage in R-3 being 600 sq. ft. Ms. Ritchie stated that R-3 has a fairly restrictive size because the lot sizes are generally smaller and that is why staff is supporting this variance. Member ABBOTT wanted to know the limit for a detached garage in R-2. Member KUNTZ said it is 1000 sq. ft. Member HOVLAND commented that if the property were in a different zone district there would be no need for a variance. Member GRIFFITH complimented Ms. Ritchie on her site plan exhibit. Member BELL asked where the driveway will be placed so it can reach the garage. Ms. Ritchie stated that because of the horseshoe drive currently there, which is compliant with code, the applicants will have to connect to it. Caroline Mallory and Charlotte Kettering (applicants) 4001 Marshall Street, Wheat Ridge Ms. Mallory and Ms. Kettering were sworn in. Ms. Mallory stated that this is her family homestead property and she would like to be able to go back to it as a senior and enjoy living in a house that is one level and is safe. They are concerned about security in the neighborhood right now and recently had a break in at the house. They would like to have an area where they can secure things; they would also like to upgrade the house and make an improvement in the city of Wheat Ridge. Board of Adjustment Minutes — October 22, 2015 2 Member BRADFORD asked what the timelines for the additions on the house would be. Ms. Kettering stated they hope to start in April of 2016. They plan to start with additions on the house, and then work on the garage. Member ABBOTT asked if the architecture on the garage will match that of the house. He stated the importance of the matching architecture for the neighborhood. Mr. Ritchie gave the members another exhibit to look at showing the garage elevations and materials and Ms. Mallory added the gabled roofing on the garage will match those on the house as will the siding. Member HOVLAND asked what the need is for a garage this large, but after seeing the Exhibit he saw the need to fit three cars and a workshop, tandem in set up. Ms. Mallory said they want to keep the garage consistent with the neighborhood and not have the neighbors see three garage bays from the street. Ms. Reckert stated the R-3 zone allows the construction of housing from single family up to high density residential. The applicants could have chosen to demolish the house and build four apartments in its place. So in keeping with the rest of the neighborhood, staff supports the variance because it is appropriate and in context. Member ABBOTT stated it is important to encourage indoor storage with the fourth tandem bay because it makes things look better outside. Ms. Reckert stated that with regards to neighborhood revitalization, this is a big investment and it is supported by our guiding documents. Ms. Ritchie stated that in the proposed language for the conditions, staff recommends a condition that the design and architecture be consistent with representations presented to staff. Member KUNTZ believes that the garage will be a good screen from the view of the apartments in the backyard. Member HOVLAND commented that it looks like a lot of thought has been put into in trying to make it fit and it looks like a good plan. Again, if the property was in a different zone this wouldn't be an issue. Steve Stamps 3699 Teller, Wheat Ridge Mr. Stamps was sworn in. Mr. Stamps thinks this plan is an excellent idea and the addition will be an improvement for the neighborhood. Board of Adjustment Minutes — October 22, 2015 3 Member ABBOTT added number 6 and 7 to "For the Following Reasons" below. He stated it is good to add to the list why the Board Members were persuaded to vote in favor of the application. Upon a motion by Member ABBOTT and a seconded by Member BELL, the following motion was stated: WHEREAS, application Case No. WA -15-10 was not eligible for administrative review; and WHEREAS, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law; and WHEREAS, the variance applied for may be granted without detriment to the public welfare and without impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Board of Adjustment application Case No. WA -15-10 be, and hereby is APPROVED TYPE OF VARIANCE: Request for approval of a 360 -square foot (60%) variance from the 600 -square foot maximum size standard to allow a 960 -square foot detached garage. FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. There are unique conditions of lot size and variability within the neighborhood which will result in an accessory structure that is compatible with the surrounding area and the existing home. The proposed garage will appear incidental to the home, and significant property investment will occur as a result of approval of the variance. 2. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. 3. The alleged hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. 4. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare. 5. No objections were received regarding the variance request. 6. There was positive neighborhood testimony given. 7. The proposed investment is consistent with the Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy and other documents supported by the city that encourage property improvements. WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The design and architecture of the proposed garage shall be consistent with representations depicted in the application materials, subject to staff review and approval through review of a building permit. Motion carried 8-0 Board of Adjustment Minutes — October 22, 2015 4 B. Case No. WA -15-11 The case was presented by Lisa Ritchie. She entered the contents of the case file and packet materials, the zoning ordinance and the digital presentation into the record. She stated all appropriate notification and posting requirements have been met and advised the board there was jurisdiction to hear the case. She reviewed the presentation and staff report. The applicant is requesting approval of a 5 -foot variance from the 100 -foot minimum lot width standard to allow a two-family dwelling in the R-2 zone district located at 7075 W. 32 n Avenue. Staff recommends approval of this variance. Member ABBOTT wants to know if the parking plan meets the City standard. Ms. Ritchie stated that the staff is going to look at the driveway connecting to the street and it will be reviewed when the building permit is submitted. Member BELL wanted to know if there is going to be a garage once the addition and all the work is done on the property. She is concerned about off street parking for visitors. Ms. Ritchie believes there is going to be a car port constructed. There is adequate room on the property for off street parking. Member BELL hopes there will also be parking available during the time of construction. Member PAGE asked how many parking places will be needed on the property. Ms. Reckert stated it is four per unit which also includes the garage. There is a lot of room so it should not be a problem. Member GRIFFETH asked if the other two- dwelling homes in the neighborhood were built legally. Ms. Ritchie stated that they appear to be so. Some of the homes were built before the City incorporated in 1969 so the City doesn't have all the building records. Member GRIFFETH asked if a two- family home has to be connected. Ms. Ritchie stated yes, it has to be one structure. Member HOVLAND pointed out that if the map is extended to the east side of Pierce, a lot of those homes appear to be two- family homes. Ms. Ritchie agreed. Board of Adjustment Minutes — October 22, 2015 Member BELL stated the southeast corner of Pierce and 32nd was permitted at one time to be a housing project and that is why there are multifamily homes built there. Dean Smith and Karen Smith 7075 W. 32nd Avenue, Wheat Ridge Mr. and Ms. Smith were sworn in. Mr. Smith thanked the members for bringing up the parking issue. He stated there is a single curb cut off of 32nd Avenue now and it doesn't get used a lot, but it is a place to park. Because of the topography of the site they are lucky enough to be able to turn around in the driveway and pull out front ways onto 32nd instead of backing out. A carport will be constructed on the site and part will be enclosed. Also, architecturally the second unit will be setback as to not compete with the original structure. Member HOVLAND asked if the height of the new structure is going to be much higher than what is there currently. Mr. Smith stated about 3-4 feet higher, which is well below what is allowed. Member ABBOTT appreciates the design of the new structure because it is complimentary to the existing structure and the neighborhood. It also looks like there will be no impact to the property on the east. Mr. Smith stated there are some big trees and a fence on the east side of the property and at one time they wanted the addition to be on the east, but after careful thought decided to push it back. The neighbors to the east will be impacted the most. They are renters and there have been discussions with them and they have given nothing but very positive feedback. David Cooley 7060 W. 32" Place, Wheat Ridge Mr. Cooley was sworn in. Mr. Cooley stated he is a senior citizen and has lived in and out of his house since 1957. He is not opposed to the addition, but it will impact his backyard a bit more. He would like to know the purpose of the second dwelling. Ms. Ritchie stated the applicants intend to rent out the front original part of the home and the owners will reside in the new addition. Member ABBOTT stated that his understanding is the property is zoned Residential -Two (R-2) so there can be two-family residences on the property whether it is rented or not. The board is looking at whether a two-family structure can fit appropriately on a 95 -foot lot as opposed to a 100 -foot lot. The architect has done a good job to put a nice, visually acceptable structure in view of Mr. Cooley's backyard. Jim Varner 7070 W. 32nd Place Mr. Varner was sworn in. Mr. Varner didn't know what to expect tonight, but is extremely pleased. He doesn't see the variance having any negative impact on him or his Board of Adjustment Minutes — October 22, 2015 6 property and is in full support. They only concern Mr. Varner has, is in regards to the privacy he gets from the foliage on the property line. He doesn't see the three foot high addition being much of a problem because of the foliage. He thinks it is a good improvement for the City of Wheat Ridge. Member ABBOTT asked if there is landscaping in the backyard. Mr. Varner stated there is vegetation growing on the 7075 W. 32"d property side and he is hoping it will not be pulled out because it is nice for privacy. Mr. Smith stated there is a fair amount of landscaping on the property line and they are going to do everything they can to save it. Some trees may be lost to disease and will have to come out eventually, but only one tree is slated to be removed. It is an evergreen tree next to the addition. Mr. Varner also mentioned a drop in elevation from his property to the Smith's so he really doesn't see any problem with the new addition height. Member KUNTZ stated that it looks like the north facing elevation windows are relatively small and that should also help with privacy. Member PAGE added number 5 to "For the Following Reasons" below, and stated it is good to add to the list to show why the Board Members were persuaded to vote in favor of the application. Upon a motion by Member PAGE and a second by Member KUNTZ, the following motion was stated: WHEREAS, application Case No. WA -15-11 was not eligible for administrative review; and WHEREAS, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law; and WHEREAS, the variance applied for may be granted without detriment to the public welfare and without impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Board of Adjustment application Case No. WA -15-11 be, and hereby is APPROVED TYPE OF VARIANCE: Request for approval of a 5 -foot variance from the 100 -foot minimum lot width standard to allow a 2 -family dwelling. FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: I. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality Board of Adjustment Minutes — October 22, 2015 2. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property that may not be possible without the variance. 3. The proposed investment is consistent with the Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy and other documents supported by the city that encourage property improvements. 4. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare. 5. Historically this property previously had a variance for a two family dwelling. WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The addition shall be consistent with the architectural representations shown on the submittal, or other as approved by staff. Motion carried 8-0 Member BELL and Member ABBOTT gave their compliments to Ms. Ritchie, Ms. Reckert and the staff for a job well done and setting a good example with the two variances tonight and how applicants can work together with their neighbors. 5. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING 6. OLD BUSINESS Ms. Reckert stated that a woman contacted her regarding approval of the Class II Floodplain Permit for an address on 42nd Avenue from the August 27`h meeting. The homeowner from Hoyt Street claimed she didn't have ample opportunity to speak, although her husband did speak. It has been discussed with the director of Community Development and other staff members and it was felt that the members of the Board of Adjustment had a fair hearing. Member ABBOTT stated that he understands the best defense is that they received a fair hearing. The board listened and based the decision on what was heard. The Board of Adjustment did a good job and all participated and listened. . Member GRIFFETH stated he had not heard the term Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy (NRS) yet and does everyone have to comply with it. Member ABBOTT said he didn't think so; different cases have different aspects worth accenting. Ms. Ritchie stated staff evaluates cases and compares them to plans and documents that have been supported by or adopted by City Council; the NRS is something being used as criteria; it is an evaluation and may or may not be appropriate. Member BELL stated that during a site visit on 32nd Avenue, she met a woman walking a dog and struck up a conversation. The woman's opinion was that she thought the Board Board of Adjustment Minutes — October 22, 2015 of Adjustment would not listen to her if she came to a meeting. She didn't realize the Board will always listen to keep the process fair. . Ms. Reckert stated she thinks the Board does a good job and appreciates Member ABBOTT's input and additions to the discussions and to keep up the good work. Member HOVLAND said that Member ABBOTT does a good job of explaining to the applicants what the BOA can and can't do. 7. NEW BUSINESS A. Approval of Minutes — August 27, 2015 It was moved by Member PAGE and seconded by Member BANGHART to approve the minutes as written. The motion passed 8-0. Ms. Reckert let the Board know that the November and December meetings will be combined and held on Thursday, December 10, 2015. As of now there are no cases scheduled. Member BELL asked if a sample motion can be included in the packet. Member PAGE asked if it could be printed on the divider paper. Member ABBOTT stated he likes all the "WHERE AS's" because it adds an element of formality because this is not a casual meeting. Member BELL agrees. 8. ADJOURNMENT Chair HOVLAND adjourned the meeting at 8:27p.m. I J; (I M /� ;� A Pau HOVLAND, Char Board of Adjustment Minutes — October 22, 2015 Tammy Odea ording Secretary 9 CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTION I, Tammy Odean, Secretary to the City of Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment, do hereby certify that the following Resolution was duly adopted in the City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, on the 22nd day of October 2015. CASE NO: WA -15-10 APPLICANT'S NAME: Caroline Mallory and Charlotte Kettering WHEREAS, application Case No. WA -15-10 was not eligible for administrative review; and WHEREAS, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law; and WHEREAS, the variance applied for may be granted without detriment to the public welfare and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Board of Adjustment application Case No. WA -15-10 be, and hereby is, APPROVED TYPE OF VARIANCE: Request for approval of a 360 -square foot (60%) variance from the 600 -square foot maximum size standard to allow a 960 -square foot detached garage. FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. There are unique conditions of lot size and variability within the neighborhood which will result in an accessory structure that is compatible with the surrounding area and the existing home. The proposed garage will appear incidental to the home, and significant property investment will occur as a result of approval of the variance. 2. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. 3. The alleged hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. 4. The request would not be detrimental to the public welfare. 5. No objections were received regarding the variance request. 6. There was positive neighborhood testimony given. 7. The proposed investment is consistent with the Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy and other documents supported by the city that encourage property improvements. VOTE: YES: ABBOTT, BANGHART, BELL, BRADFORD, HOVLAND, GRIFFETH, KUNTZ, and PAGE Board of Adjustment Page I NO: ABSENT: GRIEGO ADOPTED and made effective this 22nd day of November 2015. Wao v and, Chair Board of Adjustment Tammy Odean-,-Sretary Board of Adjustment Board of Adjustment Page 2 NIU -N t3rri7 Lau F'� F'ZiicJ WA -15-10 CNU = ot. a;ra Mallory and Kettering L ty I F Q" CM CUDCIM, 3615 Teller Street ' Vt=f`' T1s u� Request for a 360 square foot variance from the permitted size of 600 square feet for an accessory— (HW . cvt,, building permitted on a lot zoned Residential -Three UW- r own rCDD' Board of Adjustment October 22, 2015 1 U01 Aerial : 3615 Teller Street NIU -N t3rri7 F'� F'ZiicJ a;ra a Q" CUDCIM, cvt,, r rCDD' eft ut— caj `■ Current Zoning Aerial : 3615 Teller Street Variance Request The variance is requested for an additional 360 square feet to the maximum permitted size of an accessory structure of 600 square feet, resulting in a 960 square foot detached garage. The variance request is greater than the 50% threshold permitted to be approved by the Community Development Director Proposed Changes Apt - 3615 Teller Street 3615 Teller Street ,y'..t 3615 Teller Street Comparison of Development Standards Development R-3 Zoning Standard Proposed Standards Maximum Size for Accessory Buildings 600 Square Feet 960 Square Feet Rear Setback 10 feet 19 feet Side Setback (south) 5 feet 33 feet Max. Lot Coverage 40% 19% 3615 Teller Street Staff Recommendation Staff recommends APPROVAL of the request for the following reasons: • There are unique conditions of lot size and variability within the neighborhood which will result in an accessory structure that is compatible with the surrounding area and existing home. • The proposed garage will appear incidental to the horne, and significant property investment will occur as a result of the variance. • The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. • The alleged hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. • The request would not be detrimental to public welfare. ke 41( Ir City of �Wheat�idge TO: CASE MANAGER: CASE NO. & NAME: CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT Board of Adjustment Lisa Ritchie MEETING DATE: October 22, 2015 WA -15-10 / Mallory and Kettering ACTIONS REQUESTED: Approval of a 360 square foot variance from the permitted size of 600 square feet for an accessory building permitted on a lot zoned Residential -Three (R-3) located at 3615 Teller Street. LOCATION OF REQUEST: 3615 Teller Street APPLICANT (S): Caroline Mallory and Charlotte Kettering OWNER (S): Malket Partnership APPROXIMATE AREA: 17,700 square feet (0.41 acres) PRESENT ZONING: Residential -Three (R-3) PRESENT LAND USE: Single Family Residential ENTER INTO RECORD: (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) ZONING ORDINANCE Board of Adjustment Case No. WA -15-10 /Mallory and Kettering JURISDICTION: All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction for the Board to hear this case. I. REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a variance to allow an accessory building 360 square feet larger than the permitted size of 600 sq ft, resulting in an accessory building that will be 960 sq ft. Per the Residential -Three (R-3) zone district standards, a major accessory building can be no larger than 600 sq ft. This results in a variance that would be greater than permitted to be reviewed administratively and requires a hearing before the Board of Adjustment. Section 26-115.0 (Variances and Waivers) of the Wheat Ridge City Code empowers the Board of Adjustment to hear and decide on variances from the strict application of the zoning district development standards. Because the application includes a variance request that exceeds 50% of the development standard, the application is not eligible for administrative approval and is required to be heard at a public hearing before the Board of Adjustment. II. CASE ANALYSIS The applicants, who are also the owners, are requesting the variance at 3615 Teller Street in order to construct a 960 square foot detached garage with a workshop at the single family residence. (Exhibit 1, Aerial). The property is zoned Residential -Three (R-3), a zone district that provides high quality, safe, quiet and stable medium to high-density residential neighborhoods, and to prohibit activities of any nature which are incompatible with the medium to high-density residential character. The parcel is located on the west side of Teller Street, just north of 35`h Place. The total lot area is 17,700 square feet (0.41 acres), per the Jefferson County Assessor. The property is in an area predominately zoned R-2 to the south and R-3 to the north. The subject property is zoned R-3, but is immediately adjacent to the area zoned R-2. The neighborhood character is low density residential to the south and east, and medium to high density residential to the north and west. (Exhibit 2, Zoning Map). The subject lot currently contains a single family home that was constructed in 1949, per the Jefferson County Assessor. The lot is platted as Lot 2 of the Morningside Retirement Community Subdivision. The single story home has a footprint of approximately 1,487 square feet. In addition to the construction of the detached garage, the applicants are also proposing 880 sq ft of additions to the primary home. The total lot coverage proposed with the additions and the detached garage of 960 sq ft will be roughly 3,327 sq ft, or 19%. The maximum lot coverage permitted in the R-3 zone is 40%. The lot is rectangular in shape with roughly 170 feet of width and 100 feet of depth. The existing home is located on the northern portion of the lot, with a 45'-8" front setback, a 21'-9" setback to the northern side property line, a 16'-0" rear setback and an 85'-0" setback to the southern side property line. The home is constructed on an angle in relationship to the street. The lot gently slopes from the southwest corner of the property to the northeast corner, with roughly 8 feet of fall. (Exhibit 3, ILC, Exhibit 4, Site Photos). The property owners have been renting the property for a number of years and now desire to live in the home. They are planning improvements, including the conversion of an existing sunroom to make it a Board ofAdjustment Case No. WA -15-10 /Mallory and Kettering permanent space, an addition to the front living space, an addition toward the rear of the home, and other minor additions and upgrades. The property in its current condition has no garage. The property owners desire to add a three car garage and workshop to the property. The single story garage is proposed to be located on the southern portion of the lot, with a 33'-0" side setback and a 19'-0" rear setback. (Exhibit S, Proposed Site Plan, Attachment A, Materials and Elevations Board). Additionally, the applicants have concerns for the safety of their vehicles, as there have been four reported motor vehicle thefts within a 600 foot radius of their property within the past year, per the Wheat Ridge Police Department. They desire the ability to secure their three vehicles. The variances would result in a single family home with an oversized detached garage with a workshop. All other development standards for the R-3 zone district will be met. R-3 Development Standards: Required Actual Lot Area 7,500 square feet min 17,700 sf Lot Width 60 feet (min) 170 feet Major Accessory Building: Required Proposed -Building Coverage 40% max 19% -Building Size 600 sq ft max 960 sq ft -Height for Accessory Building 15 feet max I 1 feet Front Setback east 25 feet min 40 feet Rear Setback west 10 feet min 19 feet Side Setback (north) 5 feet (min) 113 feet Side Setback south 5 feet (min) 33 feet The 15 -day notification period for the public hearing is currently in progress. As part of their application, the applicants' provided a letter from residents at 3550 Teller Street stating they have no objection to the variance request (Exhibit 7, Letter from Craig and Debra Allen). As of October 15, 2015 no objections have been received. III. VARIANCE CRITERIA In order to approve a variance, the Board of Adjustment must determine that the majority of the "criteria for review" listed in Section 26-115.C.4 of the City Code have been met. The applicant has provided their analysis of the application's compliance with the variance criteria (Exhibit 6, Letter of Request with Analysis of Criteria). Staff provides the following review and analysis of the variance criteria. 1. The property in question would not yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located. If the request were denied, the property would continue to yield a reasonable return in use. The property would continue to function as a single-family residence, regardless of the outcome of the variance request. Staff finds this criterion has not been met. Board of Adjustment Case No. WA -15-10 /Mallory and Kettering 2. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. The variance is not likely to alter the character of the locality. The requested size variance will result in the property staying in the same character as the surrounding area. The surrounding area predominately has lots with varying sizes, number of units, and street orientations. The proposed additions and garage will result in a property well under the building coverage threshold for the zone district. The proposed architectural design is compatible with the existing home and other homes in the neighborhood. While staff typically does not support variances for size of accessory structures, in this case, the size of the lot and its location adjacent to a wide variety of residential property types results in unique considerations which justify this request. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 3. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property with this application, which would not be possible without the variance. The applicants are proposing a substantial investment in the property through the construction of additions and the detached garage. The project is expected to add value to the property, and the proposed investment is consistent with the Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy and will result in an owner occupied property. That being said, investment in the property could occur without the approval of this variance. Staff finds this criterion has not been met. 4. The particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved results in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out. There is no particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property that presents a unique hardship upon the applicant. Rather, the applicants desire the garage be detached in order to maximize the amount of sunlight into the home on the southern and western sides. The location of the home near the northern property line leaves no option for the garage to be located on that side. Staff finds this criterion has not been met. 5. The alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. The current property owners purchased the property prior to the establishment of the zone district boundaries and the construction of the existing house. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 6. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located, Board of Adjustment 4 Case No. WA -15-10 /Mallory and Kettering by, among other things, substantially or permanently impairing the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or substantially diminishing or impairing property values within the neighborhood. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare and would not be injurious to neighboring property or improvements. It would not hinder or impair the development of the adjacent properties. The adequate supply of air and light would not be compromised as a result of this request. The request would not increase the congestion in the streets. Nor would it cause an obstruction to motorists on the adjacent streets or impede the sight distance triangle. The request will not diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Conversely, the proposed improvements will likely have a positive impact on the neighborhood by upgrading an aging ranch home and promoting investment in property. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 7. The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are present in the neighborhood and are not unique to the property. As stated above, the applicants desire to construct a three car garage on the property that currently does not have one. There is a property safety concern that the applicants raise due to four motor vehicle thefts within a 600 foot radius within the past year, per the Wheat Ridge Police Department. The applicants desire the ability to secure their three vehicles. This is not a condition unique to the property. Staff finds that this criterion has been met. 8. Granting of the variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities. Single family homes and their accessory buildings are not required to meet building codes pertaining to the accommodation of persons with disabilities. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. 9. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual: The Architectural and Site Design Manual does not apply to single and two family dwelling units. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. IV. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Board of Adjustment Case No. WA -15-10 /Mallory and Kettering Having found the application in compliance with the majority of the review criteria, staff recommends APPROVAL of a variance to permit a garage in excess of the permitted size of 600 sq ft. Staff recommends approval for the following reasons: 1. There are unique conditions of lot size and variability within the neighborhood which will result in an accessory structure that is compatible with the surrounding area and the existing home. The proposed garage will appear incidental to the home, and significant property investment will occur as a result of approval of the variance. 2. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. 3. The alleged hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. 4. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare. 5. No objections were received regarding the variance request. With the following conditions: 1. The design and architecture of the proposed garage shall be consistent with representations depicted in the application materials, subject to staff review and approval through review of a building permit. Attachments: A. Materials and Elevation Board B. Letter of Support from neighbor at 3550 Teller Street. C. Resolution Template Board ofAdjustment Case No. WA -15-10 /Mallory and Kettering EXHIBIT 1: AERIAL Board of'Adjustment Case No. JVA-15-10 /Mallory and Kettering i EXHIBIT 2: ZONING MAP Board of Adjustment Case No. WA -15-10 /Mallory and Kettering EXHIBIT 3: ILC -OT FOLOO tL1.E(8F 1 ri '� N36A �.•�.'�! OW STORY FRAW r rrrl cD � LOT 1 v CO 'CF., HOUSE N �7 M m LOT FOLM 108.00' I Faro Mr, aaF COLLhONE SURVEYING, INC. NOF TH 7573 South Ames way Littleton, CO 80128 303-972-8000 fox 303-972-4=1 Or;Xld Scale r = W, IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that this improvement location certificate was primed for 0 15 30 MALKET PARTWJ:75 P (FAQ that it is not o land surveyplat or improvement srvey plot, and that it is not to be relied upon for the estoblishrment of fence, bulbConcrete i; or CC = Covered Coete other fuhre improvement fees This certificate is valid only for use by MALLET PARTfERSIp Canrrete and descrbes the Parcels appearance on 2015-03-14. 1 further certify that the L-- -.J improvements on the above described Parcel on this date. 2015-03-14, except utility —x—x— = Fence connections are entirely within the boundaries of the parcel. except as shown, that there are no encroochry nts upon the described Prerxses by improvements an any odtoi\i\g preiises, except as indicated and that there is ro apparent evidence or Sig' of any easement crossing or burdening any port of said parcel, except as noted Notice: Accordrq to Colorado law you must commence Note: All platted and apparent easements any legal action hosed upon my defect in this are shown Record easements, if any, are bl rovement location certificate within three years located by information provided by the after you tM-at discovered such defect %"IN- Customer,, unless otherwise noted In no may my action e R£&i�plya based upon any defect in thisp•,.•yL`' e improvement location certificate j be commenced more than ten 4-ncA� years from the date of the =9:-+ 16099 Emmacertificate shown hereon G -P-% •. S' r° Professiord Land SLrveyor Address 36£ TELLER STREET aR l u M°: r Order 40350018 %f1111*io Existing Property Condition Board of Adjustment Case No. WA -15-10 /Mallory and Kettering EXHIBIT 4: SITE PHOTOS Board of Adjustment 10 Case No. WA -15-10 / Mallory and Kettering Shown above is the rear of the home, taken from approximately the location where the garage is proposed, looking toward the rear of the home. The existing sunroom will be improved to be a permanent structure. The applicants desire to preserve the windows shown in this photo. Board of Adjustment Case No. WA-15-10/Mallory and Kettering EXHIBIT 5: PROPOSED SITE PLAN 100.51' A V #W15 0. OW STORY FRAME #W15 OISE STORY, FRAME 0 cy) Q0 LOT I 00 HOUSE FOUND PIN CAP ILLEGIBLE LOT FOUND IPIN L aBLE Pl j > o CC 452" x '\ � 1 !"t ► — r 2t.V 03 CD ;U � 28-05-08 mm FCUND PIN CAP ILLEGIBLE Board qfAdjustment 12 Case No. WA -15-10 /Mallory and Kettering EXHIBIT 6: LETTER OF REQUEST and RESPONSE TO CRITERIA The placement of the existing structure at 3615 Teller Street is situated with a southern exposure for light and winter heat with large windows and a sunroom. Solar heating and use of natural light will continue as a focus for the house. Due to the location of the house —the garage can only be placed on the south side of the property. There is no place to attach the garage to the house. There is sufficient room on the property to place a three car garage at a reasonable distance from the house to allow for solar light and heating and not compromise the required set backs or encroach upon neighbors. The unique handicap for this property is the condition of Teller Street and the recurring automobile thefts and vandalism. We would like to have a secure place for our vehicles. It is unfortunate that this single family home is locked into an R3 zoning which necessitates a variance to provide an appropriate structure to house three vehicles. Board ofA4justnient 13 Case No. IVA-15-10 /Malloiti� and Kettering Response to the Variance Review Criteria for 3615 Teller Street 1. The residence at 3615 Teller Street is a single family home. It is not a multifamily dwelling. It has been in this location for 65 years. 2. The variance would not alter the character of the locality. 3. We will be making a substantial investment in the redevelopment of this property. A three car garage is the norm for new single family dwellings. It will help increase the security and value for future resale. 4. There is no place to park three cars as there is no street parking for residents and visitors. The three car garage will allow off street parking for three cars and those of visitors. This will help prevent additional congestion on Teller Street. 5. The hardship for this property is that it is a single family home lost in an R3 zone. 6. A three car garage would not be a detriment to the public or injurious to other property or the neighborhood. The north property line is adjacent to a retention pond for Morningside Retirement Community. The west property line is adjacent to parking garages and a black -topped driveway for Morningside Retirement Community. The south property line is adjacent to a single family residence which is zoned R2. The south wall of the garage will be 33 feet from the adjoining property line. The improvements to the property will be an advantage to surrounding property owners. Letters from owners of adjacent properties regarding this garage will follow. 7. The need for secure off-street parking is a recurring problem for residents of single family homes on Teller Street and other adjacent streets where street parking is not an option. Examples of garage solutions are: 1. A detached three car garage at 3425 W. 34`h Ave. 2. A detached large workshop garage at 3405 Teller Street with very narrow set backs. 8. This is a single family home. 9. This is a single family home. Board of Acl usiment 14 Case No. W.4-15-10 / Mallon' and Kettering EXHIBIT 7: LETTER FROM CRAIG and DEBRA ALLEN August 31, 2015 Craig and Debra Allen 3550 Teller St. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Re: 3615 Teller St. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 To Whom It May Concern: My wife and I were approached by the owners of 3615 Teller St, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 about building a 3 car garage on their property. We have NO CONTEST to their request. If you have any questions, feel free to call 303-425-0213 or 303-359-1283 or contact us by mail. Regards, Craig E. Allen Debra K. Allen j 1 Board ojAdjustment 15 Case No. WA-15-10/Ma!lory and Kettering August 31, 2015 Craig and Debra Allen 3550 Teller St. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Re: 3615 Teller St. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 To Whom It May Concern: My wife and I were approached by the owners of 3615 Teller St, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 about building a 3 car garage on their property. We have NO CONTEST to their request. If you have any questions, feel free to call 303-425-0213 or 303-359-1283 or contact us by mail. Regards, Craig E. Allen Debra K. Allen City of Wh6atR,,,Liddgc POSTING CERTIFICATION CASE NO. WA -15-10 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT /HEARING DATE: V V laU I, �em[�'ne a2u QK oL residing at -/O O as the applicant for Case No. (name) October 22, 2015 e ++ems,' sko- (t ske-c_t (.0 30, Sz (address) WA -15-10 hereby certify that I have posted the Notice of Public Hearing at e04 (2,' Lo -LL location on this 6?cQ day of Qc o bN R. c�p/,S'and do hereby certify that said sign has been posted and remained in place for fifteen (15) days prior to and including the scheduled day of public hearing of this case. The sign was posted in the position shown on the map below. NOTE: This form must be submitted at the public hearing on this case an wi e placed in the applicant's case file at the Community Development Department. MAP 1 City of W heat �idgc PUBLIC POSTING REQUIREMENTS One sign must be posted per street frontage. In addition, the following requirements must be met: ■ The sign must be located within the property boundaries. ■ The sign must be securely mounted on a flat surface. ■ The sign must be elevated a minimum of thirty (30) inches from ground. ■ The sign must be visible from the street without obstruction. ■ The sign must be legible and posted for fifteen (15) continuous days prior to and including the day of the hearing [sign must be in place until 5pm on September 3, 2015. It is the applicant's responsibility to certify that these requirements have been met and to submit a completed Posting Certification Form to the Community Development Department. CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing to consider Case No. WA -15-10, an application filed by Caroline Mallory and Charlotte Kettering for approval of a 360 - square foot variance (60%) from the 600 -square foot maximum size standard to allow a 960 -square foot detached garage located at 3615 Teller Street will be held in the City Council Chambers, Municipal Building located at 7500 West 29`h Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado, on October 22, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. All interested citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. The full text of this notice is available in electronic form on the City's official website, www.ci.wheatridge.co.us, Legal Notices. Copies are also available in printed form in the Community Development Department. Published: Wheat Ridge Transcript, October 8, 2015 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing to consider Case No. WA -15-10, an application filed by Caroline Mallory and Charlotte Kettering for approval of a 360 - square foot variance (60%) from the 600 -square foot maximum size standard to allow a 960 -square foot detached garage located at 3615 Teller Street will be held in the City Council Chambers, Municipal Building located at 7500 West 291h Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado, on October 22, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. All interested citizens are invited to speak at the Public Hearing or submit written comments. Legal Description: THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Lot 2, Morningside Retirement Community Subdivision, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado -9 City of Wheatdge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29`h Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 LETTER NOTICE (As required pursuant to Code Section 26-109.1)) October 8, 2015 Dear Property Owner / Current Resident: This is to inform you of Case No. WA -15-10, an application filed by Caroline Mallory and Charlotte Kettering for approval of a 360 -square foot variance (60%) from the 600 -square foot maximum size standard to allow a 960 -square foot detached garage located at 3615 Teller Street. This request is scheduled for public hearing in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue. The schedule is as follows: Board of Adjustment October 22, 201.5 (a 7:00 p.m., As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at 303-235-2846. Thank you, City of Wheat Ridge Planning Division Individuals with disabilities are encouraged to participate in all public meetings sponsored by the City of Wheat Ridge. If you need inclusion assistance, please call Heather Geyer, Public Information Officer, at 303-235-2826 at least one week in advance of the meeting. .ci.�rheatridge.co.us Vicinity Map wz 15 1 o.doc Proposed Garage Location ,9L'691 o•�. Proposed Garage f � 6L O O CD City of W heat Ric LETTER NOTICE CERTIFICATION (as required pursuant to Code Section 26-109.D) Case No.: WZ-15-10 Date of Board of Adjustment hearing: October 22, 2015 I Tammy Odean, Administrative Assistant, Community Development Department, hereby certify that I mailed a total of 38 letters on October 8, 2015 to the attached recipient list at least 15 days prior to a scheduled public hearing. Signature: a -- Date: SCHMEISER WILLIAM F BERKOWITZ DEBRA MADRID PEALE INVESTMENTS LLC 4681 W 75TH AVE DEBORAH 63 S LOGAN ST WESTMINSTER CO 80030 6593 ZANG ST DENVER CO 80209 ARVADA CO 80004 STAMPS STEVEN R STAMPS SARAH K 3699 TELLER ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 MSIDE LLC 3650 VANCE ST 1 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 CITY & COUNTY OF DENVER GARZA MARY THERESA % DENVER ASSESSORS OFFICE 5790 W 71 ST AVE 1445 CLEVELAND PL ARVADA CO 80003 DENVER ANNEX I CO 80202 RAEL DEUTER 1675 LEE ST LAKEWOOD CO 80215 MALKET PARTNERSHIP 4001 MARSHALL ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 KRUSE MIKE 3510 TELLER ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 RIEHLE JANET 3610 HIGH CT WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 MUDGETT JEREMY COLON MUDGETT ERIN NICOLE 3625 HIGH CT WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 EVANS RUSSELL G EVANS MARIA C 7337 W 35TH AVE WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 LUJAN RICHARD H LUJAN LAURIE E 3509 HIGH CT WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 TOOLEY PATRICK 1731 HUDSON ST DENVER CO 80220 LUCIER KEVIN J 3541 HIGH CT WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 NUNEZ MARIA C PMB 142 2000 WADSWORTH BLVD DENVER CO 80214 MUNIZ ROBBI L Z 7255 W 35TH AVE WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 PFEIFER JEROME N 6582 EVERETT ST ARVADA CO 80004 ALLEN CRAIG E ALLEN DEBRA FABIAN RAUL 3550 TELLER ST 103 S LOGAN ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 DENVER CO 80209 BENSON PROPERTIES INC 0 PO BOX 1279 LITTLETON CO 80160 MALACARNE MARGARETA 3595 HIGH CT WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 VENDENA ROXY F VENDENA DINA 7512 LUPINE CT ARVADA CO 80007 KINSEY RONALD M 3577 HIGH CT WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 TOBIN DENISE DIANE 3590 HIGH CT WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 GRIGSBY KATE MENDER NATHAN 3601 TELLER ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 STEVENS DAWN L STEVENS MEV HOLDINGS LLC GAINES WALTER D JIM R 6701 W 36TH PL 47530 50TH ST 3502 TELLER ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 SAN DIEGO CA 92115 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 SCOTT MICHAEL SCOTT MIRINDA K 8270 JELLISON CT ARVADA CO 80005 WOMBLE TERRY D WOMBLE BRENDA L 3691 TELLER ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 THOMPSON GERRY L 7273 W 35TH PL WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 LOECHER ROGER P INVESTMENTS INTERNATIONAL 5500 W 44TH AVE DENVER CO 80212 STURTEVANT SHANNON 3560 OTIS ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 FICK PATRICK S 3535 TELLER ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 PROKOP TERESA L PROKOP MARK 3701 TELLER ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 CHAVEZ ROBERTO CHAVEZ CECILIA 3695 HIGH CT WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 TELLER STREET we%e-, r%-77 169.78' 0 J X X 2 W U Z3 O Z W �N::� Response to the Variance Review Criteria for 3615 Teller Street 1. The residence at 3615 Teller Street is a single family home. It is not a multifamily dwelling. It has been in this location for 65 years. 2. The variance would not alter the character of the locality. 3. We will be making a substantial investment in the redevelopment of this property. A three car garage is the norm for new single family dwellings. It will help increase the security and value for future resale. 4. There is no place to park three cars as there is no street parking for residents and visitors. The three car garage will allow off street parking for three cars and those of visitors. This will help prevent additional congestion on Teller Street. 5. The hardship for this property is that it is a single family home lost in an R3 zone. 6. A three car garage would not be a detriment to the public or injurious to other property or the neighborhood. The north property line is adjacent to a retention pond for Morningside Retirement Community. The west property line is adjacent to parking garages and a blacktopped driveway for Morningside Retirement Community. The south property line is adjacent to a single family residence which is zoned R2. The south wall of the garage will be 33 feet from the adjoining property line. The improvements to the property will be an advantage to surrounding property owners. Letters from owners of adjacent properties regarding this garage will follow. 7. The need for secure off-street parking is a recurring problem for residents of single family homes on Teller Street and other adjacent streets where street parking is not an option. Examples of garage solutions are: 1. A detached three car garage at 3425 W. 34`x' Ave. 2. A detached large workshop garage at 3405 Teller Street with very narrow set backs. 8. This is a single family home. 9. This is a single family home. The placement of the existing structure at 3615 Teller Street is situated with a southern exposure for light and winter heat with large windows and a sunroom. Solar heating and use of natural light will continue as a focus for the house. Due to the location of the house —the garage can only be placed on the south side of the property. There is no place to attach the garage to the house. There is sufficient room on the property to place a three car garage at a reasonable distance from the house to allow for solar light and heating and not compromise the required set backs or encroach upon neighbors. The unique handicap for this property is the condition of Teller Street and the recurring automobile thefts and vandalism. We would like to have a secure place for our vehicles. It is unfortunate that this single family home is locked into an R3 zoning which necessitates a variance to provide an appropriate structure to house three vehicles. Legal Description Provided by Customer LOT 2, M10RMNGSIDE RETIREMENT COMvUNITY SUBDIVISION, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. LOT 1 FOUND 100.51' NCK orE STORY ;n 1 ti FRAAE �: : •• Lt CC FOUND GALE COLUMBINE SURVEYING, INC. 7573 South Ames way Littleton, CO 80128 303-972-8000 fax 303-972-8001 �O v� 0-) r-tOl6E ` �I LOT .00' X FOUND PN/Grip GiEiLE x NORTH Original Scale 1" = 30' IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE � I herebycertify that this ' prepared for 0 15 30 y mprovement location certificate was MALKET PARTrERSHP tFGFND that it is not a land survey plat or improvement survey plat, and that it is not to be relied upon for the establishment of fence, building, or CC = Covered Concrete other future i rprovement lines. This certificate is valid only for use by F ---I �. MALKET PARTTNERSHP L - = Concrete and describes the parcels appearance on 2015-03-14. 1 further certify that the -' x— = Fence improvementsib on the above described parcel on this date, 2015-03-14, except utility connections, are entirely within the boundaries of the parcel, except as shown, that there are no encroachments upon the descrbed premises by irtprovements on any adjoining premises, except as indicated, and that there is no apparent evidence or sign of any easement crossing or burdening any part of said parcel, except as noted Notice_ According to Colorado law you must commence Note: All plotted and apparent easements any legal action based upon any defect in this ore shown Record easements, if any, are improvement location certificate within three years located by information provided by the after you first discovered such defect\\wLwuu�e„+,a customer, unless otherwise noted In no event, may any action `�4 �S! RECZ?�" based L.pon any defect in this " improvement location certificate be corrrrienced more than ten ; ca; Ca' -P © 1 years from the date of the ff. :-L G0199 t tr certificate shown hereon. ! -r e,sr awrence G PLS '.�,,s�o • ,•••„ SJ : Professiorid Laud Surveyor Address 3615 TELLER STREETmm�m�"'��\�\\ Order 40350018 `6 Z� n.,►„ City Of Wheat Ridgge 0yi25/2H15 12:24 CDbb ZONING APPLICATION FEES CM12323 Fr'SD ZONING APPLICATION FEES AOGUN' T'AMENT RECEIVED 420.64 CHECK: 1054 TOTAL MOUNT ---------------------- 410,00 --- ----- 420_ 00 Applicant City Owner City_ City of "�qWheat Rdge LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION Community Development Department 7500 West 29`h Avenue • Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 • Phone (303) 235-2846 Ll rz-u L- , .V-3 E- �,� Au o �� (Please print or type an iinformation) C> zur�Tl� �� ► j ��� I,�) c� Address 400'1-W P• F -Shy n," S -\ KA F— State Address State Zip Zip. 3 �'3 S + Phone Z- Fax Phone Fax Contact sA ,M E Address Phone City State Zip Fax (The person listed as contact will be contacted to answer questions regarding this application, provide additional information when necessary, post public hearing signs, will receive a copy of the staff report prior to Public Hearing, and shall be responsible for forwarding all verbal and written communication to applicant and owner.) Location of request (address): C; ! rz-�-L V-tc- 1-c2 p ay Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request): Please refer to submittal checklists for complete application requirements; incomplete applications will not be accepted O Change of zone or zone conditions O Special Use Permit O Subdivision: Minor (5 lots or less) O Consolidation Plat O Conditional Use Permit O Subdivision: Major (More than 5 lots) O Flood Plain Special Exception O Site Plan approval O Temporary Use, Building, Sign O Lot Line Adjustment O Concept Plan approval X Variance/Waiver (from Section Z�: O Planned Building Group O Right of Way Vacation O Other: Detailed description of request: _1 %-I CAW -J -'r' ii- S a' o Gr�;- v )= p A 11 C� sSc> -'Z- -4 Z u 1 t - P 1 r)y C 3 cr, e G A� G'�-' i F rc„ ,'v\ (n vv S t= TTL) LpU S1 Required information: Assessors Parcel Number: 1 O S S D 3 Size of Lot (acres or square footage): -74 o -+ S F Current Zoning: 1 Z 3 Proposed Zoning: Current Use: Proposed Use: --) C -.A z G G I-z.b 6 E I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above, without whose consent the requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners must submit ower -of -all rney from the owner which approved of lhi Notarized Signature of Applica 'IffNNIFER K LILENOTARY PUBLIC State of Colorado STATE OF COLORADO Countyof ? } ss NOTARY ID 20034001868 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JANUARY 16, 201 The foregoing instrument (Land Use Processing Application) was acknowledged by me this !L 1 x l dayof , 20- by (Q V6 I YL? i� a (QZ U l V I I U I i C F- - � H� Notaryblic My co(mrfiission expires f /&_/20 j 9 To be filled out by staff: Date received Comp Plan Design. Related Case No. Fee $ '126 C0 Receipt No. Case No. -QA -15-/b Zoning Quarter Section Map Pre -App Mtg. Date Case Manager