HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/02/1996
MINQTES OF MEETING
May 2, 1996
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION
1. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order
by Chairperson LANGDON at 7:33 p.m., on May 2, 1996 in the
Council Chambers of the Municipal Building, 7500 West 29th
Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado.
2. ROLL CALL:
MEMBERS PRESENT: Robert Eckhardt
Harry Williams
Jay Rasplicka
Carl A. Cerveny
George Langdon
Warren Johnson
STAFF PRESENT: Glen Gidley, Director of
Planning & Development
Sandra Wiggins, Secretary
•
PiTBLIC HEARING
The following is the official copy of Planning Commission minutes
for the Public Hearing of May 2, 1996. A copy of these minutes
is retained both in the office of the City Clerk and. in the
Department of Planning and Development of the City of Wheat
Ridge.
•
Planning Commission Minutes Page 2
• May 2, 1996
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. APPROVE THE ORDER OF THE AGENDA
Mr. Gidley informed those present that Case No. WV-96-1, the
second case on the agenda, had been withdrawn. He explained that
the City had no jurisdiction to pursue the vacation, since the
State will directly transfer ownership of the land to the owner.
The city will not be involved. With that change,, Commissioner
WILLIAMS moved to approve the order of the agenda for the meeting
of May 2, 1996 as amended. Commissioner RASPLICKA seconded the
motion. Motion carried 5-0. (Commissioner CERVENY was out of
the room for a brief period.)
5. APPROVAL OF MuvuiES
Commissioner ECKHARDT moved to approve the minutes for the
meeting of April 4, 1996 as printed. Commissioner JOHNSON
seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0.
6. PUBLIC FORUM (This is the time for anyone to speak on any
subject not appearing under Item 7 of the Public Hearing
section of the agenda.)
• No one had signed the roster, nor came forward to speak at that
time.
7. PUBLIC HEARING
1. ~_~a rr~~W7,-96-3 ~ An application by the City of Wheat
Ridge for approval of a rezoning from Agricultural-One
(A-1) to Planned Commercial Development (PCD) and for
the establishment of uses allowed and general design
parameters akin to an Outline Development plan. Said
property is located at approximately 12851 West 32nd
Avenue.
Mr. Cerveny returned to the meeting at that time.
Mr. Gidley presented the staff report. Entered into the record
and accepted by the Chairperson were the Comprehensive Plan,
Zoning Ordinance, case file, packet materials and exhibits.
Chairperson LANGDON asked if a representative from CDOT had to be
present.
Mr. Gidley explained that it was not necessary, since a joint
agreement was made during a court proceeding between the City of
Wheat Ridge, Colorado Department of Transportation and Mr.
• Richter. --
Planning Commission Minutes Page 3
• May 2, 1996
Dwaine Richter, 6565 South Syracuse Way, #1202, Englewood, was
sworn in. Mr. Richter stated he agreed with the comments Staff
had made. He reiterated he was the owner of 70 West Business
Center and stated he agreed with the rezoning. Mr. Richter
stated he felt the request for rezoning should be approved, as he
was giving up land zoned PCD and therefore the land he received
also should be zoned PCD.
Commission had no questions for Mr. Richter at that time.
Mr. Gidley read a letter from Colorado Department of
Transportation and requested that it be entered into the record.
Chairperson r,nNGDON accepted the letter.
Norm Ross, 3145 Zinnia Street, was sworn in. Mr. Ross noted that
he lives directly south of the 70 West Business Park. He stated
the area is primarily residential in nature. Restricted
Commercial zoning would be more appropriate, he felt. The
commercial-One zone designation would be acceptable, with a few
exceptions - those would be Section B., Nos. 2, 5, 9, 21, 31 and
25. Those uses did not belong in a residential neighborhood he
added. Mr. Ross also wanted the developer to submit a plan for
• the entire parcel. Care should be taken so that uses are not
allowed that generate high volumes of traffic. He felt the
construction material should be brick and there should be a bike
path along the vacated Youngfield Service Road or, sidewalks
should. be installed along-the relocated service road.
Commissioner CERVENY asked Mr. Ross when he had moved onto Zinnia
Street.
Mr. Ross answered approximately 1980.
Commissioner CERVENY asked about the sound barrier that had been
installed recently.
Mr. Gidley stated that a sound barrier had been installed along
the west side.
Commissioner CERVENY asked why the wall had been built.
Mr. Gidley stated the sound wall was installed along the west
side of 70 West Business Center specifically to abate concerns of
residents to the west.
Commissioner CERVENY asked what those concerns might have been.
Mr. Gidley stated the concerns included business activity, noise,
• lights, etc.
Planning Commission Minutes
• May 2, 1996
Page 4
Commissioner CERVENY asked if there were restrictions placed on
the C-1 zoning stated in the agreement reached in court.
Mr. Gidley stated there were no restrictions placed on the
existing C-1 zoning in the agreement reached by the court. That
was not an issue, he added. The issues were the relocation of
the service road, and the subsequent rezoning of the service road
to similar zoning as that land which was taken.
Commissioner CERVENY asked if the restrictions would be similar
zoning.
Mr. Gidley answered yes, the zoning would be PCD, with C-1-type
uses.
Commissioner CERVENY asked Mr. Gidley if similar restrictions
could be placed on the property consistent with the court order,
if intent is met?
Mr. Gidley answered if the restrictions were reasonable, he
thought it could be done.
Mr. Gidley informed Commission of the uses Mr. Ross indicated he
• would like to see eliminated from the list of C-1 uses for the
subject property. They were as follows: B.2. Adult
entertainment establishment (could not comply in terms of
location); 5. Auto service/repair/maintenance, etc.; 9.
Commercial machine shops; 21. Motor fueling stations; 25. Drive-
in restaurant; 31. Taverns/nightclubs/lounges.
Commissioner RASPLICKA asked if the items of auto- repair are
included or excluded in C-1 zoning uses.
Mr. Gidley answered currently they are included.
Chairperson LANGDON asked what uses would be left, if the ones he
named were not allowed.
Mr. Gidley answered that there is quite a long list of allowed
uses - 32 general uses and three or four times that many specific
uses. He added that in terms of placing a building on the land,
it is fairly limited, he thought it would be mostly landscaping,
setbacks, parking and drive aisles. From a practical standpoint,
Mr. Gidley stated it was likely the land would become parking for
adjacent commercial uses, drive aisles or landscaping associated
with. the primary use on the balance of the property.
Chairperson LANGDON asked if anyone in the audience would like to
speak, other than those signing the roster.
•
Planning Commission Minutes Page 5
• May 2, 1996
Patrir_ia Rubano, 13050 West 32nd Avenue, was sworn in. Ms.
Rubano stated she moved to the area in 1987. She asked the
Commission to consider the feelings of residents in the area,
since it is primarily a residential area. Currently, traffic is
a problem, as well as constant food smells.
Chairperson LANGDON suggested Mr. Gidley explain how the land was
zoned C-l.
Mr. Gidley offered to give a brief history of the property, which
he did, informing those present that the C-1 zoning has been in
place since 1974.
Commissioner ECHIiARDT stated he was never in favor of the present
zoning on the parcel, however, he did not feel there was much
that could be done to change it at this time. He elaborated.
No other comments were offered at that time.
Commissioner CERVENY moved that Case No. WZ-96-3, an application
by the City of Wheat Ridge for approval of a rezoning from
Agricultural-One (A-1) to Planned Commercial Development (PCD)
and for the establishment of uses allowed and general design
• parameters akin to an Outline Development Plan for property
located at approximately 12851 West 32nd Avenue, be Approved for
the following reasons:
1. The property is within the City of Wheat Ridge, and all
notification and posting requirements have been met,
therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case.
2. It will allow for future development of the 70 West Business
Center.
3. The criteria used to evaluate a rezoning request supports
approval of this request.
4. The zoning being established has been in place since 1975
when the property was annexed.
With the following condition:
1. That C-1 conditions and design parameters be allowed on the
property and that this property be included in any final
development plans for the 70 West Business Center.
Commission would suggest the owner of the property take into
consideration the character of the property and its' impact on
the surrounding neighborhood.
• Commissioner WILLIAMS seconded the motion. Motion carried 6-0.
Planning Commission Minutes
• May 2, 1996
8. CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING
Page 6
9. OLD BUSINESS
A. Commissioner CERVENY asked Mr. Gidley about a change in
the PRD between West 32nd and West 35th Avenues just
east of Nelson Street.
Mr. Gidley stated that City Council did not follow through on
Planning Commission recommendation regarding replat of the
subdivision. The public improvements are being constructed
according to the original plat.
Discussion followed.
10. NEW BUSINESS
A. Proposed Master Plan for NW 38th Avenue and Kipling
Area
Mr. Gidley noted that this area is being studied comprehensively,
as it is one of the largest areas of generally undeveloped
• property left in Wheat Ridge. He went over Concepts A through E
with Commission and invited Commission to attend a neighborhood
meeting scheduled May 9, at 7:30 p.m. Jefferson Avenue United
Methodist Church.
Commissioner CERVENY informed Commission that he would be unable
to participate on this case when it comes before Planning
Commission, as he is a "Lister" of an involved property.
11. DISCIISSION AND DECISION ITEMS
12. COMMITTEE AND DEPARTMSNT REPORTS
A. Proposed rezoning - District I
Mr. Gidley stated that before the City can pursue that, enabling
legislation must be adopted to the Code of Laws. Council has
approved the concept of the legislation Monday, April 29. Once
the legislation has passed, Mr. Gidley will present a Resolution
to Council setting forth the specific area and suggest reasons
why the City would pursue the mass rezoning. The process, he
felt would take most of the summer. Commission probably won't
see it_again before July.
B. Comprehensive Plan Update
• Mr. Gidley stated that Audrey Knight, a planner, had been hired
on a part-time, temporary basis. He added that Audrey has a
Planning Commission Minutes Page 7
• May 2, 1996
background in comprehensive planning. Most appointments have
been made to the steering committee. Copies of the steering
committee roster will be provided to Commission.
C. Council Actions Report
Mr. Gidley reported that Council is reviewing all board and
commission bylaws. In addition, they have voiced a desire to
meet with boards and commissions.
The nonconforming use matter will finally be placed on Council
agenda for first reading.
Council has requested that staff draft a change to the Commercial
zone regulations relative to nonconforming uses, mass rezoning
proposal and residential uses currently zoned commercial.
Council has authorized Public Works to move forward on the bike
path design along West 32nd Avenue, from Wadsworth Blvd. to
Dudley Street.
Council has requested that the City Administrator contact Crown
Hill representatives regarding the possibility of annexing.
• Mr. Gidley reminded those present of a Planning Commission
Workshop on June 15, Saturday. Mr. Gidley is on the planning
committee for the workshop. Additional information should be
arriving soon, he added.
Commissioners CERVENY AND ECKHARDT informed Commission they would
be unable to attend the May 16, 1996 meeting. Discussion
followed. By consensus, it was decided a memo would be sent to
Council urging the vacancies on Planning Commission be filled as
soon as possible.
13. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Commissioner CERVENY moved for
adjournment. Commissioner JOHNSON seconded the motion. Motion
carried 6-0. Meeting adjourned at 9:20 m.
c.~~ a
Sa~'cira Wiggins, S~ tary