HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/02/2005
STUDY SESSION AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
Municipal Building
7500 W. 29th Ave.
Mav 2. 2005
6:30 p.m.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - APRIL 18, 2005
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Item 1.
Staff Reports
a) Unnecessary Noise/Disturbing the Peace Ordinance
b) Joint EOC with the City of Lakewood
-
Item 2.
Community Graffiti Response Plan
Item 3.
Public Improvements
Item 4.
Fleet Replacement and Service Interval Schedules
Item 5.
Discussion of June Town Meeting
.......
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
Municipal Building
7500 W, 29th Avenue
GJh
'T4~
April 18, 2005
Mayor Cerveny call the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. City Council members present:
Karen Berry, Jerry DiTullio, Wanda Sang, Dean Gokey, Mike Stites, Larry Schulz, Lena
Rotola; Karen Adams was absent due to a family matter. Also present: Randy Young,
City Manager; Tim Paranto, Director of Public Works; Dan Brennan, Chief of Police;
Alan White, Director of Community Development; City Clerk Pam Anderson; staff.
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
as printed,
Item 1.
Staff Reports
Barbara Delgadillo asked Council direction on the 2005 CDBG allocation. She stated
- that the allocation to Stride, Inc. was for the purchase of the former Jefferson County
Housing Authority building This is no longer the plan. Council directed staff to bring the
CDBG allocation to Stride, Inc. to Council for reconsideration
Alan White, Director of Community Development, updated Council on the issue of
parking requirements Direction was given to Mr. White to ask staff to look at
alternatives to the current parking requirements in commercial zones, for example a
variance or other type of process and report back to Council on some of the
alternatives.
Mr. White briefed City Council on a provision in the regulations that allow an owner that
is short of parking spaces to approach owners within 300 feet to enter into a parking
agreement to make up the deficit, and to bring such agreements before the City Council
as the representative owner of the City property Discussion followed, and direction was
given to Mr White to pursue parking agreements.
City Clerk Pam Anderson presented a staff report on the 2005 Legislative Budget.
Direction was given to bring forward a budget supplement for the 2005 Legislative
Budget for Council Dinner meetings in the amount of 2,500 00
Direction was given to bring forward a budget supplement for the 2005 Legislative
Budget for legislative events in the amount of $500.00 per Council member.
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION MINUTES: Apri/18, 2005
2
Item 2.
Police Evidence Building
Tim Paranto, Director of Public Works and Police Chief Dan Brennan presented the
staff report on this item. Chief Brennan discussed the evidence storage capabilities,
mandated requirements, and issues with the current condition of the evidence storage
facility including security, climate control, fire protection and the needs for the future.
Commander Wade Hammond and Sergeant Kevin Armstrong were available for
questions and a discussion followed
Direction was given to staff to proceed with the re-design of the building, details and
costs of the project, assess and assign a "drop-dead" date and bring it back to City
Council for consideration.
The meeting was recessed at 7:30 p.m. Resumed at 7'40 p.m.
Item 3.
Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy (NRS) and Neighborhood Meeting
and Data Review
Jeff Winston, of Winston and Associates and Charles Buki of CZB, LLC presented the
Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Interim Report. The report covered the summary of the
NRS neighborhood meeting comments. Council asked questions and discussion followed
Mr. Buki made a PowerPoint presentation regarding the analysis of the data collection to date
and the emerging recommendations that will be brought back to City Council for consideration.
A discussion followed
-
Meeting adjourned at 9:30 p m.
APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON
BY A VOTE OF
to
Lena Rotola, Council President
The preceding Minutes were prepared according to 547. of Robert's Rules of Order, i.e they
contain a record of what was done at the meeting, not what was said by the members
STUDY SESSION
May 2, 2005
Item 1 a.
WHEAT RIDGE POLICE DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Gretchen Cerveny and City Council
VIA: Randy Young, City Manage~/')(.
FROM: Daniel Brennan, Chief of Police p~/'o \
DATE. April 18th, 2005
SUBJECT: Unnecessary Noise/Disturbing the Peace Ordinance
BACKGROUND
The Wheat Ridge Police Department responds to Disturbing the Peace calls on a daily basis.
Analyzing statistics for the years 2001 through 2004, we discovered that Wheat Ridge Police
officers handled Disturbing the Peace calls on an average of 112 per month
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
Citizens often call to report loud car stereos in their neighborhoods. These loud car stereos can
- often be heard several blocks away, disturbing the peace of our citizens. Many of these citizens
are reluctant to either provide their names to dispatch or allow the police to contact them as
witnesses against the person responsible for the loud car stereos. Officers who hear loud car
stereos and want to enforce the current Disturbing the Peace ordinance cannot be considered
as "victims" of the unnecessary noise
Citizens who live near parks or greenbelt areas are often confronted with loud portable stereos.
These citizens would like for the police to be able to stop the source of the noise, but they are
reluctant to have the police contact them so that a complaint can be lodged.
Additionally, as the Wheat Ridge Disturbing the Peace ordinance is currently written, the only
standard that can be used for enforcement is, "sound at such a level, or at such an hour, as to
disturb the peace of any other person" This standard is difficult to prove in court because it is
not an objective level by which to measure the noise
The result of these factors is that the people responsible for disturbing the peace of our citizens
are rarely held accountable for their actions.
ALTERNATIVES
1, Amend the current ordinance to permit the police to be the complaining parties and
provide an objective measure of unreasonable noise
2. Amend the ordinance as in option #1 and provide specific decibel levels as a measure of
noise
3, Continue enforcement efforts with the existing ordinance.
RECOMMENDATION
Option #2 would require the police department to purchase sound meters that cost
approximately $1500 each This option appears cost-prohibitive
Option #3 does not adequately address our current enforcement needs for the reasons stated
above
We recommend option #1, as implemented in the attached ordinance We believe that this
change in the ordinance's language will improve the enforcement and prosecution of
unnecessary noise that disturbs the peace of our citizens. We recommend that the Mayor and
the City Council consider repealing the current Disturbing the Peace ordinance, and enacting a
new ordinance, which effectively deals with regulating Unnecessary Noise and Disturbing the
Peace This new ordinance would allow for police officers to be the complainants on
Unnecessary Noise complaints, in addition to providing an objective measure of unreasonable
noise
The City Attorney's office has already drafted a new ordinance at the request of the police
department. This new ordinance subjects any noise/sound to an objective standard, specifically
that it will be deemed unreasonable any sound which is audible twenty-five (25) or more feet
from the noise or sound source The new ordinance also deals specifically with noise created in
multi-unit dwellings, and with trash truck pick-ups after 11'OOpm and before 7:00am The
ordinance will also allow for any member of the police department who personally observes a
violation of this ordinance to serve as the complaining party in the prosecution of such a
violation, regardless of whether or not the officer's observation was initiated by the complaint of
- another party
The new ordinance has been reviewed by the Police Department, Courts, the City Prosecutor,
and the Wheat Ridge Judiciary Each of these segments of the City's government have
endorsed the attached ordinance.
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER
Council Bill No
Ordinance No.
Series of 2005
TITLE. AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REENACTING SECTION 16-103 OF
THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS CONCERNING UNNECESSARY
NOISE AND DISTURBING THE PEACE
WHEREAS, pursuant to C.R.S S 31-15-401(1)(e) and its home rule authority,
the City possesses the authority to prevent and suppress unreasonable noise and
conduct that disturbs the peace of others, and
WHEREAS, pursuant to this authority, the City previously adopted a prohibition
against disturbing the peace, codified as Section 16-103 of the Code of Laws of the City
of Wheat Ridge ("Code of Laws"), and
WHEREAS, eighteen years of experience with said Section 16-103 has given the
City the knowledge of what noise enforcement issues are a priority within the City and
the best manner to address the same; and
--
WHEREAS, the City therefore desires to repeal and reenact Section 16-103 of
the Code of Laws as provided herein.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO'
Section 1 Section 16-103 of the Code of Laws is hereby repealed and
reenacted, to read in its entirety as follows'
Sec. 16-103. Unreasonable noise; disturbing the peace.
(a) It is unlawful for any person to make, continue or cause to be
made or to permit or assist another to make, continue or cause to be
made, any unreasonable noise which, under all of the circumstances
presented, would annoy, injure or endanger the comfort, repose or peace
of a person of ordinary sensitivities. The following noises and
circumstances shall be deemed as prima facie unreasonable
(1) Any noise or sound which is audible twenty-five (25) or more
feet from the noise or sound source or at the property line of the
property upon which the source is located
(2) Any noise or sound which is audible within a private residence
that the person responsible for the sound has no right to
1
occupy, specifically including but not limited to apartments,
common interest communities and other multi-unit dwelling
structures.
(3) A person or group of persons engaged in loud and continuing
activities which are audible twenty-five (25) or more feet from
such activities or at the property line of the property upon which
such activities are taking place, continuing for a minimum of
fifteen (15) minutes between the hours of 11.00 p.m and 7'00
a.m
(4) Any person performing or permitting the performance of trash
pickup with a truck which has a compactor or the capacity to
raise and dump dumpsters in any area zoned for residential
uses between the hours of 11'00 pm and 7:00 a.m For
purposes of this paragraph, testimony that the name of a
business which holds itself out as being in the business of trash
hauling was written on the trash truck shall be prima facie
evidence that the trash truck was owned by and under the
control of the employer so identified
---
(b) Any member of the police department who personally observes a
violation of this section may serve as the complaining party in the
prosecution of such violation, regardless of whether the officer's
observation was initiated by the complaint of another party.
Section 2. Safety Clause. The City Council hereby finds, determines, and
declares that this Ordinance is promulgated under the general police power of the City
of Wheat Ridge, that it is promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare of the public
and that this Ordinance is necessary for the preservation of health and safety and for
the protection of public convenience and welfare. The City Council further determines
that the Ordinance bears a rational relation to the proper legislative object sought to be
attained.
Section 3. Severability; Conflictinq Ordinances Repealed If any section,
subsection or clause of this ordinance shall be deemed to be unconstitutional or
otherwise invalid, the validity of the remaining sections, subsections and clauses shall
not be affected thereby. All other ordinances, parts of ordinances or codes adopted
thereby in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or the code or ordinance
adopted hereby are hereby repealed.
Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after
final publication, as provided by Section 5.11 of the Charter
INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first reading by a vote of to
on this day of . 2005, ordered published in
full in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Wheat Ridge and Public Hearing
2
and consideration on final passage set for , 2005, at 7'00
o'clock pm, in the Council Chambers, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge,
Colorado.
READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final reading by
a vote of to , this day of , 2005.
SIGNED by the Mayor on this
day of
,2005
Gretchen Cerveny, Mayor
ATTEST.
Pamela Anderson, City Clerk
Approved As To Form
Gerald E. Dahl, City Attorney
First Publication'
Second Publication
Wheat Ridge Transcript:
Effective Date
3
STUDY SESSION
May 2, 2005
Item 1 b.
WHEAT RIDGE POLICE DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Randy Young, City Manager
~rtl
FROM:
Daniel Brennan, Chief of Police
DATE. April 22, 2005
SUBJECT: Joint EOC with the City of Lakewood
-
BACKGROUND During the past several years staff has tried to create an Emergency
Operations Center (EOC) for the City of Wheat Ridge The EOC is currently located in the
Police Training Room; thus making it not accessible nor operational at all times. Extensive set-
up is needed to use this room as an EOC We have learned through county-wide emergency
exercises, etc., that it is apparent that our own EOC is not feasible at this time The City of
Lakewood's EOC is generally dedicated for EOC use Lakewood's EOC is set up with the
needed equipment and ready to be used at all times. The City has struggled with the
emergency management program as a whole for a number of years with equipment issues,
policies and procedures, as well as resources. As Homeland Security Issues continue to grow,
we are finding we don't have the resources nor the staff needed to meet the needs of the
community
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM Due to the physical location and limited resources, it has
become apparent that it is not economically feasible to create and maintain an EOC for the City
ALTERNATIVES Alternatives include continue working on our own EOC or joining another
local municipality(s) to establish a joint (or shared) EOC. The department explored with
Lakewood's Emergency Management department the prepared IGA - Feasibility of a Joint
Emergency Operations Center The cost of the feasibility study will be $35,000. Lakewood will
pay the $35,000 with Wheat Ridge reimbursing Lakewood $3,000 to participate in the study
Wheat Ridge was invited by Lakewood to participate in this study
RECOMMENDATION
1 Staff recommends entering into an IGA with Lakewood to research the
feasibility of co-locating a shared EOC with the City of Lakewood. A
feasibility study will be done in conjunction with a site screening analysis
to identify the best site for an EOC It is proposed that the primary facility
be located in Lakewood with a back-up facility located in Wheat Ridge
sometime in the future.
2. Staff recommends approval of funds ($3,000) to be taken from the police
department's emergency management program approved by City Council
in the 2005 budget.
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LAKEWOOD AND THE CITY
OF WHEAT RIDGE FOR REGARDING THE FEASIBILITY OF A
JOINT EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER
This agreement IS made and entered mto this day of , 2005 by and
between the City of Wheat Ridge, with offices at 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge,
Colorado, 80033, (sometimes herem after referred to as Wheat Ridge) and the City of Lakewood,
with offices at 480 South Allison Parkway, Lakewood, Colorado, 80226, (sometimes hereinafter
referred to as Lakewood), both of which are muniCipal corporations of the State of Colorado and
sometImes hereinafter referred together as "Parties."
WHEREAS, Lakewood wishes to determine the feasibility of relocating and constructing an
Emergency OperatIOns Center (EOC) and an E911 police communication centcr; and,
WHEREAS, Wheat RIdge desires to explore with Lakewood the feasibility of operating ajoint
EOC, but does not wlsh to consider relocatIng the Wheat Ridge E911 Communications center;
and,
WHEREAS, significant cost, organizatIOnal and operational efficienCies can be realized if both
Parties can jomtly operate an EOC at the same location, and,
WHEREAS, the Parties have determined It IS In the best interest of their residents to jointly
construct, operate and maIntam an EOC, and,
-
WHEREAS, the Parties are governmental entities, each with authonty to enter Into agreements
to provide any function, serVice, or facilIty lawfully authorized to each of them as proVided by
S 29-1-203 of the Colorado Revised Statutes.
NOW, THEREFORE, m conSIderation of the mutual covenants and commitments made herem.
the Parties agrec as follows:
I. Program DescnptlOn
A. The Parties enter Into thiS agreement for the primary purpose of researching the
feaSibility of co-locating an EOC The feasibility study will be done in
conjunction with a site screening analysis contract that the City of Lakewood has
entered into with the architectural firm of Reseutek Design Group, LLC The
feasibility study will identify the best site for an E911 police commUnIcatIOn
center and an EOC
B Lakewood shall fund the feasibility study in the amount of approximately Thirty-
Five Thousand Dollars ($35,00000) Lakewood shall have full authority to
choose the best site as evidenced by the feasibility study or to reJect all sItes.
C Wheat Ridge shall reimburse Lakewood Three Thousand Dollars ($3,000 00) for
its participation in the feaSibilIty study This financial contnbution recognizes
that Wheat Ridge IS participating m only the EOC portion of the study and not the
relocation of the Wheat Ridge E911 Communications Center Wheat Ridge may
participate in the study and review the study upon its completion. Wheat Ridge
shall have the authonty to state Its preference for the ultImate sIte location to
Lakewood and the Reseutek Design Group, LLC and partlclpatc In dISCUSSIons
related thereto
D After the site is selected, the Parties expect, but do not guarantee, that they wIll
proceed with the design and construction of the E91l Center and EOC
II. Funds Management
Each Party agrees that Lakewood shall be responsible for paying the InitIal cost of the
site selectIOn study Wheat Ridge shall reimburse Lakewood for $3,000 when invoiced
by Lakewood at the completion of the study
Each Party pledges its best effort to appropnate funds as specified in this SectIon but no
Party shall be liable for any amounts unless and until the governIng body of such Party
has appropriated funds pursuant to thiS Agreement.
III.
Term
-
This Agreement shall become effective upon the signature of both partIes. The
Agreement shall termInate upon completIOn of the feasibility study or August 1,2005,
whIchever occurs first.
IV
Termination
Any Party may withdraw from this Agreement, which withdrawal shall be effective thirty
(30) days after the Party mails by certified mail, return receipt requested, a written notice
of Withdrawal
V Indemmficatlon
Both Parties are governmental entitIes subJect to the proVISions of the Colorado
Governmental Immumty Act, C.R.S. 24-10-101, et seq Each Party shall be responsible
for its own neglIgent acts.
VI. Miscellaneous Provisions
A. ThiS agreement IS solely for the benefit of the parties hereto and no thIrd Party
shall be entitled to claIm or enforce any rights hereunder except as specifically
provided herein
B ThiS Agreement contains the entIre agreement between the parties, and shall not
be amended or modified in any manncr Without such amendment or modificatIOn
being agreed to and executed in writing by both paI1ies.
2
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed thiS Agreement as of the date first written
above
CITY OF LAKEWOOD
By'
Michael] Rock.
City Manager
ATTEST
By'
Margy Greer
City Clerk
APPROVED:
By'
Richard] Plastino
Director of Public Works
-
APPROVED AS TO FORM.
Roger W Noonan
City Attorney
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
By'
Randy Young
City Manager
ATTEST'
By'
Pam Anderson
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM.
Gerald Dahl
City Attorney
3
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LAKEWOOD AND THE CITY
OF WHEAT RIDGE FOR REGARDING THE FEASIBILITY OF A
JOINT EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER
This agreement IS made and entered mto this day of , 2005 by and
between the City of Wheat Ridge, with offices at 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge,
Colorado, 80033, (sometimes herem after referred to as Wheat Ridge) and the City of Lakewood,
with offices at 480 South Allison Parkway, Lakewood, Colorado, 80226, (sometImes hereinafter
referred to as Lakewood), both of whIch are municipal corporations of the State of Colorado and
sometimes herem after referred together as "PartIes"
WHEREAS, Lakewood wishes to determine the feasibility of relocatmg and constructing an
Emergency Operations Center (EOC) and an E911 polIce communicatIOn center; and,
WHEREAS, Wheat Ridge desires to explore with Lakewood the feasibility of operating ajoint
EOC, but does not wish to consider relocating the Wheat RIdge E911 CommunIcatIOns center;
and,
WHEREAS, significant cost, organIzatIOnal and operatIOnal effiCienCies can be realIzed If both
Parties can jointly operate an EOC at the same location, and,
WHEREAS, the Parties have determined it is in the best interest of their reSIdents to JOIntly
construct, operate and maintain an EOC, and,
-
WHEREAS, the Parties are governmental entities, each with authonty to enter Into agreements
to provide any function, serVice, or facility lawfully authorized to each of them as provided by
~ 29-1-203 of the Colorado Revised Statutes.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and commitments made herem,
the Parties agree as follows
I. Program Description
A. The Parties enter into this agreement for the pnmary purpose of researching the
feasibility of co-locatmg an EOC The feasibility study wIll be done in
conjunction with a site screening analysIs contract that the City of Lakewood has
entered into with the architectural firm of Reseutek DeSign Group, LLC The
feasibility study will identify the best site for an E911 police commUnIcation
center and an EOC
B Lakewood shall fund the feasibility study in the amount of approximately Thirty
Five Thousand Dollars ($35,00000) Lakewood shall have full authority to
choose the best sIte as evidenced by the feasibility study or to reJect all sites.
C Wheat Ridge shall reimburse Lakewood Three Thousand Dollars ($3,00000) for
its participation in the feasibility study This financial contribution recognizes
that Wheat Ridge IS partlclpatmg m only the EOC portion of the study and not the
1
relocation of the Wheat RIdge E911 Communications Center. Wheat RIdge may
participate in the study and revIew the study upon Its completion. Wheat RIdge
shall have the authonty to state its preference for the ultImate sIte location to
Lakewood and the Reseutek Design Group, LLC and participate In discussions
related thereto
D After the site is selected, the Parties expect, but do not guarantee, that they will
proceed with the design and construction of the E911 Center and EOC
II. Funds Management
Each Party agrees that Lakewood shall be responsible for paying the initial cost of the
site selection study Wheat Ridge shall reimburse Lakewood for $3,000 when invoiced
by Lakewood at the completion of the study.
Each Party pledges ItS best effort to appropriate funds as specified In thIS SectIOn but no
Party shall be lIable for any amounts unless and until the governing body of such Party
has appropriated funds pursuant to this Agreement.
III.
Term
-
This Agreement shall become effective upon the signature of both parties. The
Agreement shall termInate upon completIon of the feasibility study or August I, 2005,
whichever occurs first.
IV
TermInatIOn
Any Party may Withdraw from this Agreement, which withdrawal shall be effective thirty
(30) days after the Party mails by certified maIl, return receipt requested, a written notice
of withdrawal
V Indemnification
Both Parties are governmental entitles subJect to the provisions of the Colorado
Governmental ImmUnIty Act, C.R.S 24-10-10 1, et seq Each Party shall be responsible
for its own negligent acts.
VI. Miscellaneous Provisions
A. ThIS agreement is solely for the benefit of the parties hercto and no third Party
shall be entitled to claim or enforce any rights hereunder except as specifIcally
provided herein.
B This Agreement contaInS the entIre agreement between the parties, and shall not
be amended or modified in any manner without such amendment or modification
being agreed to and executed in writing by both parties.
2
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first wntten
above.
CITY OF LAKEWOOD
By'
Michael J Rock
City Manager
ATTEST
By'
Margy Greer
City Clerk
APPROVED'
By'
Richard J Plastino
Director of PublIc Works
-
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Roger W Noonan
City Attorney
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
By'
Randy Young
City Manager
ATTEST
By'
Pam Anderson
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM.
Gerald Dahl
City Attorney
3
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
MEMORANDUM
TO' Randy Young, City Manager
FROM. Joe Cassa
DATE: March 22, 2005
SUBJECT. Budget Transfer / Accounting Correction
Budget Transfer
~
Accounting Correction
D
1 It is requested that you make the following transfer / correction of funds'
FROM.
Acct #01-215-650-660
Acct #_
Acct #
Acct #
Acct #
$350.00
$
$-
$-
$-
TO'
Acct #01-215-700-704
Acct #_
Acct #_
Acct#_
Acct #_
$
$-
$-
$-
$-
2. The reason for thIs transfer / correction IS: Transfer dollars to ray for the architectural deSign
- services to establish a 10mt EOC with Lakewood.
3 The rules as to this transfer are as follows.
A. Transfer is within the Departmental budget with no funds being transferred into or out of the
Department.
B If transfer involves a 600-649 Personnel Services account, it must be within these accounts &
Department.
C. If transfer involves an 800 Capital account, it is less than $2,500.
D If this is an accounting correction a copy of the original purchase requisition must be attached.
Requested by' Michelle Stodden
Monies are / are not available.
Deputy City Manager
The above request is APPROVED / DISAPPROVED
, City Manager
STUDY SESSION
May 2, 2005
Item 2.
WHEAT RIDGE POLICE DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor Gretchen Cerveny and City Council
VIA:
Randy Young, City Manager
\~~
FROM:
Daniel Brennan, Chief of Police
DATE. April 18, 2005
SUBJECT: Community Graffiti Response Plan
-
BACKGROUND
Most of the Denver Metro area communities began to experience the social and economic
impacts from graffiti in the early 1990's. "Taggers" were the initial individuals or groups
associated with graffiti or "tagging." Taggers and street gangs have used tagging as a method
to identify territory or send a message to other groups. Graffiti is cyclical and a crime of
opportunity, making apprehension of offenders difficult.
Proactive patrol for graffiti violations was implemented in 1993 with the department's addition of
the Police Bike Patrol Program. Patrolling on mountain bikes allowed police officers, teamed
with officers from Animal-Park-Code Enforcement, the Gang Unit, and Selective Education
Enforcement, to focus on areas in the city known to harbor graffiti "artists" The City had a "no
tolerance" campaign for curfew violations, park violations after hours, and other juvenile criminal
activity Teams would spend a few hours each night patrolling neighborhoods, parks and
greenbelt. Juveniles contacted after dark would be interviewed, warned about participating in
criminal activity, and summoned to court for any violations. Interview cards with juvenile and
parent contact information were gathered and entered into the database computer system for
future comparisons.
During this time frame graffiti located by the Police Department was documented and
photographed. Several juveniles were prosecuted for "tagging" during this "no-tolerance"
campaign In addition, the Selective Education and Enforcement Unit provided paint and other
materials to property owners at no cost to remove the graffiti. These proactive bike patrols and
other prevention programs were discontinued due to budget cuts.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
The following information provides five year statistical background of graffiti incidents reported
to the Police Department:
YEAR TOTAL CASES APCE PATROL .NULL's
2000 93 39 50 4
2001 175 114 50 11
2002 172 150 18 4
2003 348 221 123 4
2004 287 121 152 14
TOTALS 1,075 645 393 37
-
These numbers do not reflect the incidents of graffiti discovered by Public Works and Parks,
which are often cleaned up without being reported to the Police Department. Graffiti calls for
service fit into three categories' graffiti on public right-of-way; graffiti in the parks and along the
greenbelt; and graffiti occurring on private property As mentioned previously, Patrol and
Animal-Park-Code Enforcement Officers have traditionally responded to graffiti calls for service
in the parks and on private property When the City began experiencing budgetary cutbacks,
the Parks and Recreation Department discontinued reporting the majority of graffiti incidents to
the Police Department because it took too long for them to respond. Today, the Parks and
Recreation Department uses Palm Pilots to track incidents of graffiti in the parks or along the
greenbelt. The Parks and Recreation Department makes every effort to cleanup the graffiti as
promptly as possible
The Public Works Department makes every effort to remove graffiti located on public right-of-
ways as soon as possible Currently, Public Works personnel document the date of removal,
type of property "tagged", location of property, and costs associated with removal. The Police
Department is working with both departments on standardizing reporting of these incidents so
we have a more accurate indication on the number of actual graffiti incidents occurring in the
community
The Police Department continues to respond to graffiti calls for service. When a call for service
is received or an incident of graffiti is observed, the officer is responsible for completing a report
and photographing the damage. If the incident occurs on private property the owner is
contacted in person, via telephone or certified letter (for out of town property owners) per city
ordinance. The property owner is issued a written warning to remove the graffiti within seven (7)
days. If graffiti is removed, the property is in compliance and no further action is required;
however, if graffiti is not removed, the property owner is written a summons to court and the
graffiti removed by the City (abated) Public Works personnel are contacted to remove graffiti in
public rights-of-way and Parks maintenance personnel are contacted to remove graffiti in parks,
greenbelt and open space areas. To date, 100% voluntary compliance from private property
owners has been achieved.
ALTERNATIVES
There are a number of approaches that can be taken to address the issue of graffiti in a
community Research has shown that approaches that focus exclusively on enforcement to
control offenders has had little effect on the amount of graffiti activity Apprehending and
prosecuting graffiti offenders is difficult, to say the least. The following alternatives are proven
programs, which include self-help projects and changes in offender prosecution, and have
shown a reduction nationwide in the number of graffiti events:
y Neighborhood Watch Programs for neighborhoods impacted by crime
y Clean-up squads of volunteers, employees, and adjudicated offenders volunteering
their time to remove graffiti. These groups often establish a semi-annual community
graffiti clean up day for neighborhood groups and associations.
~ Programs and educational materials to educate parents in graffiti recognition.
~ Enforcing curfew violations with a "no-tolerance" campaign.
~ Community Code Advisory Program (CCAP) provides a proactive way to address
property maintenance concerns that impact neighborhoods as a whole.
~ Continue to use City resources to cleanup graffiti in our parks and public works. The
City currently takes responsibility for all graffiti cleanup (parks, public right-of-ways
and private property) Public Works expended $16,866.02 from January 1, 2004
through March 2, 2005, an average cost of $252 per removal day Parks
maintenance expended $14,483 to remove 76 incidents of graffiti from January 1,
2004 through March 2, 2005, an average cost of $190 per removal day.
-
y Outsourcing graffiti cleanup to a private contractor. The costs associated with this
vary depending on the vendor and extent of cleanup required.
RECOMMENDATION
The Police Department has worked closely with personnel from Parks and Recreation and
Public works on the issue of graffiti. Based on input from many people the Police Department is
making the following recommendations.
II
Reporting and documentation guidelines should be consistent throughout all city
departments. The Police Department will work with Public Works and the Parks and
Recreation Departments on standardizing a reporting format. These reports will be
forwarded to the Police Department for input into the Records Management System.
Public Works and Parks Maintenance personnel will continue to remove graffiti from the
public rights-of-way, parks, and greenbelt areas based on availability of manpower and
budget restraints. Public Works and Parks Maintenance will continue to itemize per-
incident expenditures related to removing graffiti including man-hours, materials and
equipment hours.
In graffiti cases on private property, a police officer will respond to document and
photograph the graffiti The police officer will contact the property owner, issue a notice
to the owner to cleanup the graffiti, and provide the property owner with written notice to
remove the graffiti within seven (7) days. Educational information is provided to the
property owner on how to remove graffiti, vendor contact information and information on
obtaining free paint. A follow-up visit is made to ensure the graffiti has been removed. If
the graffiti has been removed, the property is in compliance If the graffiti has not been
removed, the police officer will forward a copy of the police report to the Animal-Park-
Code Enforcement Unit for administrative follow up which includes issuing a summons to
court and abatement of the property.
In addition, citizens are expressing an interest in volunteering for community programs
addressing neighborhood concerns. Using volunteers is a proactive approach used by
several municipalities to address property maintenance concerns impacting
neighborhoods as a whole. The most commonly used program is the Community Code
Advisory Program (CCAP) Volunteers would be provided training by city staff
personnel CCAP volunteers will hand out educational notices and information regarding
possible violations of nuisance codes, including graffiti, as well as resource information
about how to resolve the violation Volunteers will return to the property to check for
compliance If the violation is corrected, the volunteer sends a thank-you note If the
problem remains, the violations are referred to the Animal-Park-Code Enforcement staff
Volunteers will also establish a semi-annual neighborhood graffiti-removal day It will
take some time to establish a department volunteer program and train these volunteers
but this is certainly a worthwhile approach
A Graffiti Hotline is operational and will be monitored by Police Department personnel.
The graffiti hotline number is 303-235-2909 and it currently has a voice mail message to
contact police dispatch at 303-237-2220 A selection menu will be developed on the
Hotline to distribute information on removal procedures, removal companies, reporting
and community messages.
The Police Department proposes that the City's web page be updated to include an
informational page on resources for cleaning materials and removal of graffiti. A web
page currently exists, but shows as "under construction"
III
IV.
V Outsourcing graffiti removal can be made available on an as needed basis or on a
contract basis instead of using City personnel and resources. The Police Department
has contacted two vendors about outsourcing graffiti cleanup. Cabral's Mobile Power
Wash charges $75 to respond to the scene and $2 per square foot for graffiti removal A
total cost to remove a ten square-foot area painted with graffiti would be $95 Goodbye
Graffiti will be providing the department with an estimate on providing contract services
for all graffiti cleanup, with the exception of private property on May 2, 2005
It is important to keep in mind the difficulty in determining specific cleanup costs because
of the many variables that must be considered such as the size of the area that needs to
be cleaned, the location of the graffiti, the type of material being cleaned and the type of
paint or marker used. We hope the contract estimate provided by one of the vendors on
the costs to cleanup graffiti in the parks, greenbelt, open space and public right-of-ways
will assist us in making a cost/benefit determination.
Graffiti is an issue that affects the entire city It will take a concentrated effort by Public
Works, Park Maintenance, and the Police Department through the approval of the City
Council, to reduce this eyesore in our community
DB
--
() \ 'S tv d'''A~ e,C I tJ
j .,,-
":;\\CC~'I ~ '- >' ~V~_
"')- ? - v,
WORKING TOGETHER TO CREATE
A GRAFFITI FREE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
2005
-
I':~
r'A~
'~A
~..,
Goodbye Graffiti ™
Denver Office
300 East th Avenue, STE 314
Denver, CO 80203
Phone: 303-831-4747
Fax: 303-785-5363
Toll Free: 1-877-684-4747
www.goodbyegraffiti.com
Goodbye Graffiti™
Denver Office
#314-300 East y'h Avenue
Denver, CO 80203
Phone: 303-831-4747
Fax: 303-785-5363
(j
Goodbye Graffiti TM
Attention:
Chief Dan Brennan
City of Wheat Ridge
7500 W. 29th Ave
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Ph: (303) 235.2932
Fax: (303) 235.2949
Re: Graffiti Removal and Maintenance Proposal for the City of Wheat Ridge
Friday, April 29th, 2005
Dear Chief Brennan,
It is with great pleasure and excitement that we submit this graffiti removal proposal to
the City of Wheat Ridge.
I, George Harris, Associate of Goodbye Graffiti™ - Denver Office, am authorized to
represent our firm in any negotiations and am authorized to sign any contract that may
result. I can quickly be contacted by'
-
Phone
Email:
Fax:
Mail:
303-831-4747
gharris@goodbyegraffiti.com
303-785-5363
300 East ih Avenue, Suite 314
Denver, CO 80203
Thank you for this great opportunity and we hope to be working with the City of Wheat
Ridge to create a graffiti free city
Sin~rely,
/i/I /"~
i.j/ () .
/ . .
~~L
/
George Harris
Goodbye Graffiti™
Denver Office
Page 2
Table of Contents
-
Page 2 Cover Letter
Page 3 Table of Contents
Page 4 About Goodbye Graffiti™
Page 4-5 Methodology
Page 5 Certified Graffiti Removal Technicians
Page 6 The Launch of the Green Machine ™
Page 6 Our Ever Clean TM Program
Page 6 No Blasting Techniques
Page 6 Time Frame for Removals
Page 6 Response Time Removing Messages of Hate
Page 7 Communication with Law Enforcement
Page 7 Utilization of Environmentally Safe Products
Page 7 Use of Graffiti Proof Coating - The Green Building
Page 7-8 Quality Assurance
Page 8 ClickOff™ - A Powerful Tool
Page 8 Percentage of Time Devoted to Graffiti Removal
Page 9 Cost of Graffiti Removal and Maintenance for City of Wheat Ridge
Page 1 0 Highlight Summary
Page 11 Reference List
Page 12-14 Appendix A - Client Testimonials
Page 15-16 Appendix B - ClickOff™ Proposal Sample
Page 17-2 Reference Letters
~.. 11
( .. We Get ~t (J. . \M \
'~& KeeP. nit vi', I j .
~;::--.~
About Goodbye Graffiti™
Page 3
Goodbye Graffiti™ has removed over 5,000,000 pieces of
graffiti from public and private properties. Founded in 1997
in Vancouver, BC, Goodbye Graffiti now has ten offices
throughout Canada and the US
Goodbye Graffiti™ is the world leader in graffiti removal
technology We remove graffiti from any surface anywhere
using our complete line of proprietary graffiti removal
products. We use custom manufactured graffiti removal
vehicles. Our technological innovations include digital
ClickOffTM estimate generation, Scratchiti™ Stop Security
Film installation and the development of the world's first
turn-key graffiti removal franchise opportunity
Methodology
An integrated route list will be established including all City of Wheat Ridge properties and
parks. A small fleet of custom vehicles will patrol the entire Route List inspecting all designated
properties for graffiti. We will employ dedicated Certified Graffiti Removal Technicians running
daily routes who will identify the graffiti, photograph it, store the particulars of it in our database,
and then either remove it (One Step - 90% of cases) or (as directed by the Project Manager)
order a Graffiti Removal Truck to follow up with restoration equipment then remove it (Two
Step)
The Certified Graffiti Removal Technicians with these vehicles are the foundation of our ability
to provide fast, exceptional service for such a large area. All Graffiti Technicians wear uniforms, _
have personal tools and safety equipment, and are shining examples of our professionalism and
consistency We certify all our Graffiti Technicians using an intense training program. Once
they score more than 90% on the final exam, they are given their certification and are capable of
operating the War Wagons Th1 and cleaning more than 75 marker types off of over 50 different
substrates.
We guarantee 100% removal 1 00% of the time with no damage to any substrate on all
untouched graffiti,
Because of our extensive experience we always do it right, the first time, every time In eight
years, and after over 5 million removals, we have developed a complex system that is
inexpensive, fast, efficient, non-destructive, and environmentally sustainable
At Goodbye Graffiti™ we created our own trucks 0Nar Wagons Th1), graffiti removers, and graffiti
management system (ClickOff™). This system allows communities such as Wheat Ridge to get
professional graffiti removal services, at reasonable prices, using state of the art environmental
and operational technologies.
Condensed Removal Guide.
Sacrificial Coating - Our GP1 000 sacrificial wax based, water bome coating allows for a more
environmentally friendly graffiti removal approach. Once a coating is applied, the amount of
products used is decreased tremendously and therefore yields zero impact to the environment
and buildings.
Page 4
Spray Paint Bomb - With a quick patch test, our Graffiti Technician will apply either one of 15
proprietary products and then gently wash the graffiti away
Marker Tag - After identifying the marker type, the GT will utilize one of several wipe-on liquid
graffiti removal products. This team of environmentally friendly squirt and wipe products can
handle all paint and marker types.
Stickers - A special blade is used for sticker removal. This is followed up with the application of
an adhesive remover
Paint Restoration - Surface preparation, masking, and hand application of paint as required.
All colors will be packed in spray cans for small touch-ups when required. Full restoration will be
done on required areas.
Posters - Remove with non-abrasive techniques and collected for disposal.
Certified Graffiti Removal Technicians
Our Graffiti Technicians from across Canada and the US are trained at the Goodbye Graffiti™
headquarters in Vancouver, BC After initial interviews and reference checks, GTs are trained
using an intensive training and apprenticeship program.
The training program encompasses all systems, equipment, operations, duties, codes of
conduct and responsibilities of a Level 1 Graffiti Removal Technician. A 125 page GT manual is
provided to each trainee and is fully reviewed in a classroom setting. Practical training is also
provided using our porous and non-porous training and testing walls. A 2-hour written
examination and a two-day practical test with a minimum of 90% passing grade are required
elements for each graduate.
-
Some of the specific areas of training include.
o Graffiti Technician contract, responsibilities and code of conduct
o Vehicle care and operation
o GT toolkit and sundry equipment care and
operation
o Substrate identification and composition
o Paint and ink marker identification and
composition
o Customer service and working with the public
o Graffiti removal guide
o Graffiti restoration guide
o Personal safety
o Driving safety
o Fall protection safety
o Operations and administration
o Warehouse operations
o Goodbye Graffiti™ database
Successful graduates who have accumulated sufficient experience are encouraged to take on
managerial or supervisory roles such as Ever Clean Administrator, BIA Administrator or
Contract Operations Administrator, thereby assuming a Level 2 Jraffiti Technician role Each
GT represent Goodbye Graffiti™ as an ambassador of our company
Page 5
The Launch of the Green Machine™
Our newest graffiti removal vehicle will allow us to filter and reuse water ALL DAY LONG, then
dispose of it properly at the end of the day This vehicle is in the prototype stage but, when
completed, it will revolutionize the graffiti removal industry. We are proud to be developing the
first such graffiti removal technology available anywhere in the world.
Our Ever Clean ™ Program
Over the last eight years, Goodbye Graffrtf™,s Ever Clean TM Program has become the accepted
solution for property owners, managers and municipal governments who wish to solve their
graffiti vandalism problems. Ever Clean TM is a zero tolerance based approach that is currently
being used in tens of thousands of sites and equipment across North America. With Ever
Clean™, Goodbye Graffiti™ uses a program of weekly patrols and guaranteed removals to
eliminate all existing graffiti and keep it off through constant vigilance and quick, complete
removals of any new graffiti. Monthly service summaries with digital photos allow clients to
assess the progress of the program and to easily quantify the benefits and savings on a site by
site basis.
Hiohliahts of our Ever Clean TM Proaram.
o Weekly patrol of the entire City of Wheat Ridge sites
o Removal of all graffiti from buildings up to a height of 10 feet from the ground, including
all labour and materials
o Unlimited on-call service for all graffiti with 36 hour response time (weather permitting)
o Monthly service summaries via em ail showing all work done and digital pictures of all
graffiti removed during the month.
-
No Blasting Techniques
Goodbye Graffiti™ does not use sand blasting, soda blasting, or high-pressure washing - all of
which will permanently deface property and leave visible graffiti. Instead, our Certified Graffiti
Technicians use their training and experience, along with our proprietary line of graffiti removal
products, to remove all traces of graffiti without damaging the property.
Time Frame for Removal
Racial or Hate Graffiti:
Graffiti Report:
Identified on weekly patrols:
within 2 hours of notification
within 36 hours of notification
immediately
Response Time Removing Messages of Hate
As mentioned above, we will response in 2 hours for all racial or hate graffiti. Some graffiti does
require two days to remove, but the first application will ideally happen within 2 hours. Also, it is,
and has always been, the policy of Goodbye Graffiti™ to remove any hate graffiti for free for
anyone inside our main markets. This would include any public or City of Wheat Ridge property
This has become an excellent way for us to give back to the communities that have supported
us.
Page 6
Communication with Law Enforcement
We have, and always will, make our best efforts to help the police in any way we can. Company
representatives frequently co-present with Police Officers at business luncheons and crime
prevention events. We have also made our picture archives (over 3 million photos) available to
the police when they request it.
Utilization of Environmentally Safe Products
We produce many of our products for graffiti removal in-house in our plant in Vancouver, BC
Our zero impact systems have not only some of the
greenest products manufactured but we also use them
in such a way to have zero impact on the environment.
Our GTs are trained on product use, water care,
recycling and product conservation. The War Wagon TM
vehicles use hot water for fast, efficient cleaning and
our sacrificial coating systems can allow for quick and
clean removals while using no graffiti removal products
at all. All MSDS and Technical Data Sheets are
available. We are proud of both their effectiveness and
their environmental characteristics. To date we have
invested more than $1,000,000 developing cleaner
technologies and we are pioneering better applications ~ n I' _, ~., ~ .. ~
everyday. ....- '1 /I
-
Use of Graffiti Proof Coating - The Green Building
We have perfected a sacrificial wax based, water bome coating called GP1000. This coating is
applied to the surface using a rag, brush or roller It is invisible when it dries, and it often allows
us to wipe off the graffiti with little or no damage to the substrate. Then we simply reapply the
coating at no extra charge.
We use this coating with our Ever Clean TM program to provide a zero impact, environmentally
friendly solution to graffiti - The Green Building Program. When our sacrificial coating is
present on a substrate, the amount of graffiti removal products used is reduced tremendously
This means fewer chemicals are exposed into the environment. The sacrificial coating stops the
ink or paint from penetrating deep into the substrate allowing for quicker removals.
The GP1000 coating will be used on selected City of Wheat Ridge sites. This product is used on
bare porous surfaces, such as heritage buildings, to preserve the original finishing.
Quality Assurance
All City of Wheat Ridge sites are set up in ClickOff™ Data related to address, intersection, paint
colors, traffic pattems, cleaning guidelines etc. is all loaded into our database. This allows us to
track the frequency of service activity on the equipment as well as making it part of a patrol
route.
Page 7
The purpose of auditing Graffiti Technicians' work is to ensure all aspects performed are
consistent with Goodbye Graffrti™ standards. A pass or fail grade is given after inspecting the
employees' submitted daily work performed. 3 separate failing grades (less than 75%) are
reason for employment termination. Audit aspects include quality of work, site condition and
thoroughness. The Technician begins with 10 marks and one mark is deducted for each defect.
Examples of defects include improper poultices, omissions of wet paint signs and failed
removals. One-on-one audit reviews are performed immediately after grading has occurred.
Grades are to be posted on the Audit scorecard located in the GT room Profit Sharing and
annual bonuses are often calculated using these audits.
_ :;.
..... - - *-
-~
ClickOff™ - A Powerful Tool
JDI!W....71l
..(f;lJljl;f;..l...;1U
_Jv.')!b..-....-.np.........01
The GTs record all our technical data, removal information, site
information, and service logs, including pictures, each day
This allows for online delivery of these reports directly to our
clients. This also allows us to track the trends of graffiti by site
and item (each lamp post). Graffiti can be tracked by item, by
area or for overall trends. The proprietary data system allows
for both management and analysis with the click of a button.
I'~
I ,
il
~l 'Jo~,..GIl"~'"" ([S~7E)
'l\L~......S-
-~""""'. c<:: .....J)'...~
'_...."r_....
- -...-"--....-.
"rr_'.~...._
h._'_"""'.'
..........,.-..-
A complete cost per service analysis is produced which can be
used for long-term budget planning. Cost reduction or stability
is a goal of the program.
An example of a ClickOff™ proposal is provided in Appendix B
, ....---
"'-'--
I".'~
- ---- ~
..,.. -.,
~
-
Percentage of Time Devoted to Graffiti Removal
Since the company's founding in 1997, graffiti removal and abatement has been our complete
focus. Our commitment and dedication to this growing problem has allowed us to become world
leaders in the development of graffiti removal technologies and systems. We devote our time in
creating a graffiti free Wheat Ridge.
Page 8
Proposal
Outline of Areas and/or Items to Which Graffiti Will Be Removed From
Service Will Include Removal From:
. Parks
. Traffic Control Boxes
. Bus Stop Benches
. Utility Boxes
. Light Poles
. Pedestrian Signals
. City Owned Buildings
. Bridges
. Miscellaneous - To be determined as scope of work evolves
Cost of Graffiti Removal and Maintenance for City of Wheat Ridae
Weekly patrol of all City of Wheat Ridge public property with immediate removal of all graffiti
including posters, stickers, marker and spray paint:
Initial Clean up (Approx Value $8,000):
INCLUDED
Sacrificial Coating Application (Approx Value $2,000):
INCLUDED
-
Monthly Cost -12 months commibnent:
$5,985 per month
Includes 4 monthly patrols, removals, 10 color palette and unlimited call-ins. Other colors
available for special cases but program manages 10 plus 10 special requests.
Time Frame for Initial Clean-Up and Maintenance
The initial clean-up of existing graffiti is in the City of Wheat Ridge is expected to take three
weeks, upon granting of contract patrolling will start immediately and during the first three weeks
of the proposed program Goodbye Graffiti will focus on removal of graffiti from all areas working
zone by zone, once initial clean-up is complete the Ever-Clean Program will commence with
weekly patrols and graffiti removals as needed.
~t't ()1!~'TM '
W Ge I I
Ie. J
1~&KeePlt". U
~
Page 9
Highlight Summary
o Guaranteed 100% removal 100% of the time
o 2-hour response time for all racial or hate graffiti reports
o Immediate removal for all other graffiti identified on patrol - within 36 hours
o Extensive experience cleaning graffiti from city property and parks - bare or painted, porous
or non-porous substrates
o 10 color matched paint products provided
o Sacrificial wax based, water borne coating used
<a Weekly patrols on all Graffiti Clean-Up Routes
o Unlimited number of call-ins
o Complete accountability
o Commitment to protecting the environment
o Digital images of graffiti taken prior to removal
o Monthly detailed service summaries with digital photos provided using ClickOff™
-
o Cost per service analysis provided
o Unparalleled expertise
o All our graffiti removal technicians are trained and certified
o No Blasting Techniques - No substrate damage
o Your graffiti problem becomes our problem
o Goodbye Graffiti™ has over 8 years experience in dedicated graffiti removal - over
5,000,000 pieces of graffiti removed
@ Other services offered: hot or cold power washing, acid etch and scratch removal from
glass, anti-graffitilsecurity film installation
o
Goodbye Graffiti 1M
Page 10
Reference List
Bruce Macleod
Haney Mall - Oxford Properties
Vancouver, B C
604-467 -1554
Bill Granger
City of Port Coquitlam, BC
604-927-5488
Gary Houg
North Vancouver Recreation Commissions
North Vancouver, B.C
604-983-6308
Tom Shusterman
Park Royal Shopping Centre
West Vancouver, BC
604-922-3211
Jag Senghera
Graffiti Program Coordinator
City of Vancouver, BC
604-871-6300
-
Carmen Hinde
ICBC - 0& Y Enterprises
604-661-6580
Jeffery Watts
Facilities Director of Planning & Operations, Campus Services
Seattle Central Community College, WA
206-587 -5439
Brad Olson
Senior Real Estate Manager
Teresa E, Sante
Property Administrator
CB Richard Ellis Inc., Bellevue, WA
425-462-6914
#~~,
~
Goodbye Graffiti TM
Page 11
Appendix A - Client Testimonials
"We wish to commend you on your excellent promptness and responsiveness with regard to
servicing our contract. Furthermore, we appreciate the professional way in which you handle
your accounts and would not hesitate to recommend your company"
Kerry Lum, Manager
Abbey Place Development Ltd.
.- -~.."' ...~-.,.._. ___~,..,,~__~;..u__m~~___'~'~7_~~___...~~___~~~~..~_M__'n~_p~_W'_~~~_""'."__~_____"_~'___"'_.'''_'_''
"Goodbye Graffiti's removal practices and quality of work has been outstanding"
Jag Senghera, Graffiti Management Program Coordinator
City of Vancouver
o...._~~._.',_..___.~~~_____~_~~~______~--..__~~_~___._._____~__~____._,.,_._ ._,._._~.~, _.<___
"Since Goodbye Graffiti has implemented their Ever-Clean Program, B C Place Stadium has
been graffiti free Their quick response and regular site inspections have kept the building
looking fresh and clean each and everyday."
Brian Griffin, Manager of Stadium Operations
B.C. Place Stadium
.~- '_'7~_',~_'_'",~",~_",_,~,_~,,~~_,~_,____,_~_~.,_~_~__~'--'-'~~_._"_'~~H'_~' M"_~'_--...,'_ _"e_'. ~.~__ ~_~_.' ,,~ ..<".~.. ~_'~_,"_~_,.,,~..__.
"Our Custodial and Maintenance staff cannot effectively remove all of the graffiti with the
products available to them. Goodbye Graffiti has undertaken the massive project of removing _
graffrti on the majority of our buildings and has been able to remove the graffiti completely"
Jeffery Watts, Facilities Director of Planning & Operations, Campus Services
Seattle Central Community College
"~.'- .-'. ..~., '~- .~'~_.~_._-_._~~-~~._~-~-,-_.~~--_._._._-_. ~-'~~~"'-"'",--"-----"""""- ~--~___'"___~'__"""~~~'~~~,'__'_n_~~~~~_ .~_..
"We are very happy to have discovered Goodbye Graffiti and to have implemented their Ever-
Clean Program, it has made a big difference in the overall appearance of our shopping center
and we believe has actually reduced the recurrence of graffiti tags."
Teresa E. Sante, Property Administrator
CB Richard Ellis, Inc.
-'_.~-~'~'_'~_~'_~_~"__M_~'__.,_._______,_~~_
"Goodbye Graffiti went above and beyond the call of duty"
Scott Thompson
Columbia Pacific
~~-~-~.,_.__.~~~--~___~_~.__~_._."o_~<~~___..,
"We are very pleased with Goodbye Graffiti. We have already recommended you to our own
customers when replacing awnings."
Pamela Butcher
Rose City Awning Co. of Portland
Page 12
"We were exceptionally please with the great service and excellent work provided by Goodbye
Graffiti. They took great care to make sure all signs of the graffiti damage were cleaned. Now
the outside of our building looks much improved and the signs of vandalism are gone. Thank
you for the great work!!"
Nicole
Laurelhurst Veterinary Hospital
"We worked hard at in-house management but finally realized we needed professionals."
Keith Schiebal
Crosby Property Management
"You guys are great. Your work was efficient and looked great. You left no sign of graffiti."
Pete McKearnan
Sign Works
"Our sites always look great. They take great care of us and we really appreciate it."
Eileen Doole
Bosa Development Corporation
-
"Your work is excellent. The Ever-Clean program really works."
Doug Worbets
North Vancouver Recreation Commission
"You guys do great work. If you need a reference I'm your man."
Jim Nelson
Rogers AT&T
"Here today, gone tomorrow"
Robert Newton, Head of Park Maintenance
City of Port Coquitlam
"This is a fantastic service. We forget how much graffiti we get until we the monthly Ever-Clean
pictures arrive"
Jillian Henderson
Vancity Savings
Page 13
"Finding your company was a pleasant surprise. It solved my problem of removing graffiti from
porous surfaces. Everything came out beautifully. It looks perfect. You were timely, pleasant,
and professionaL"
Larry Valium
Interplay Design
~'~~_"R~'.~."'._"'____~__'"_'_'''~"~''> <.,-u.__~~____.. ~,~.__".'~_~~~_~~__""~_"'_'__~~ ~_~'""~~'_m~n.~~~~..~.._ _ _. L ~'"'.-' -".,,~
"I am very happy to have found this Graffiti removal company I have been a Property manager
for over 15 years and operate quite a few buildings in the Downtown core and the West end. I
continually have problems with people defacing my properties. It has been in the past a
headache to clean and remove the markings. Now, it is anything but a hassle. I call, they come,
they clean job finished. The quality of removals is fantastic as is the response time In
addition, their pricing is reasonable and makes the entire effort worthwhile I would recommend
Goodbye graffiti to any organization, which may need the service "
Paul Goldenberg
GOLDVIEW Property Management Ltd,
"I was thrilled with Goodbye Graffiti's professionalism and speediness. A job well done!"
Jan Daniel
Paracon Contact Lens Laboratory
"I was really impressed with your service. It was awesome."
Steve Leischner
Lovejoy Station
-
"You did a great job!"
Tom Muir
Lil' Cooperstown Pub & Grill
"Thank you so much Donna I know I can always count on you - what a great feeling!"
Carolyn Hooper
Property Manager for Dome Britannia
~e~:~~af!~' ~. ™ 'j
( & Keep It,! A
\~~~
Page 14
Appendix B - Sample of a ClickOff™ Proposal
-
ClickoffTM Proposal
One Click & it's Gone!
Goodbye Graffiti Burnaby (ESTIMATE)
1047 Deep Cove Road
North Vancouver, BC
Canada V7G 1 S4
REP
DATE
TERMS
PROPOSAL II
NICKM.
1/1012005
Net 30 Days
7774318
Tel: 1 (604) 861-7070
Fax: 1 (604)984~08
E-mail: nmichell@qoodbveqraffitLcom
Web' http.//www.qoodbveqraffitLcom/
NAME I ADDRESS
District of Maple ridge
Alln: Randy Vantunen
11995 Haney Place
Maple Ridge
BC V2X 6A9
LOCATION
POSTAL CODE
-
Tel: 1 (604) 467-7368
Fax: 1 (604)467-7360
E-mail: rvantunenat!maoleridae.ora
Holly Pari<
117lh Avenue @ Darby Street
Maple Ridge
ITEM
IMAGES
DESCRIPTION
QTY
RATE
TOTAL
Re: Graffiti removal
Removal Non Porous
A, B. C, Remove graffiti from Pari< equipment. play ground
0, E furniture, benches and fencing
7.00
11.00
77.00T ;
Removal - Spray Bomb
Small. Porous
F, G, H Remove small spray bombs from porous substrate
using GR product line followed by dwell time and low
pressure high volume, hot water power wash. Tags
on concrete picnic table.
3.00
39.00
117.00T
Restoration
I, J. K ,Restore spray bombed and tagged area using GR
product line followed by high hide phenolic primer
and two color matched, top coats of exterior latex.
Tags on fence.
120.00
0.95 ,
114.00T
Business Number: 862598612
SUBTOTAL
308.00 i
NOTE: Click thumbnails to enlarge images to full-screen size.
Page 15
A. '. '. 'Ii '.
F.,..,. '. Hili. I. J.'
o~;".,;t:.:. _ ,l,
K.
GST 21.56
TOTAL $329.56
SIGNATURE
-
Page 16
APR-21 -2005 13: 00 FRO'!: G(D)8YE GRAFFITI
6046844784
TO: 13037855363
1",.Yb
m. [ltJ..~
- ~\~..'
-
CITY OF VANCOUVER
COUNCillORS' OFFICE
COUNCILLOR TIM LOUIS
July 22, 2003
Mr. Perri Domm
President
Goodbye Graffiti Inc.
#1045 - 950 Powell Street
Vancouver, Be
V5A 1 HO
Dear Mr, Domm:
Thank you for your letter dated July 8, 2003,
You have done an outstanding job during the last year. I have heard many
positive comments about the job you are doing and I appreciated the overview
your letter provided.
Keep up the great work.
Sincerely,
('{ ~- .
l-, . .bl.uc.,L.
fAl\
Tim Louis
Councillor
c:Irlouis@city.vancouver,be.ca
604,873,7248
TLI cb
<153 W. 12th A.ve Vancouver, BC V5Y 1V4 T 604.873.n73 fax: 604.873-nSO www.city.vancQUv('r_bc.cl\
APR-21 -2005 13: 09 fR(J1: G(D)8'(E GRAFFITI
6046844784
TO: 13037855363
~.~'b
CITY OF VANCOUVER
COUNCILLORS' OFFICE
COUNCIUOR ELLEN WOODSWORTH
July 11, 2003
Mr. Perri Domm
President, Goodbye Graffiti Inc.
105 - 950 Powell St.
Vancouver, Be
V6A 1 H9
Dear Mr. Domm:
Thank you for your report and for the tremendous work Goodbye Graffiti is
doing in trying to keep the City of Vancouver free of graffiti.
--
Sincerely,
,d/~, 4~./J
Ellen Woodsworth
Coundllor
clrwoodsworth@City.vancouver.bc.ca
604.873.n45
EW/cs
453 W, 12th Ave VancOlNer. Be V5Y 1V4 .". 604.873,n73 fax: 604.873,7750 www,clty,vanclIUYP./'.bc.ciI
C 1 T 'I 0'
P.RT
COQUITLAM
March 3. 2004
Mr. Nick Michell
Goodbye Graffiti Burnaby
6455 Marguerite Street
Vancouver, BC V6M 3LS
Dear Sir:
This will confirm that the City of Port Coquitlam ha!l engaged Goodbye Graffiti Burnaby
to remnve graffiti from a numheT of public locations over the past three years. with great
success.
-
We are on a weekly program with this comptUlY for nul' high-profilc parlts, City Hall and
grounds and recreation centers, and the response to special requests has a1w4YS been
prompt and efficient.
Yours truly,
f~~~
Bill Granger
Manager. Parks and Services
Oper.ti_ C..en
l Tj7 llroadway StreeL l'on CoquiLla.1L Be. c....llb, Vir 2M!!
T d: 604-927 S4AA f.x: Ii04 971 54<11:1
www<ity'l'ort-coquitlam.bc.ca
APR-22-2005 e9:48 FRO'\:GO:DBYE GRAFFITI
604684<1784
TO: 13037855363
P,1'7
Hastings North Business Improvement Association
To Whom It May Concern.
T!1':: Hl$tings N..rth n..sinGSli IllJpi\)v~llJel.t AssodliiiClu l;QlIlllM:l.e<i Goodoye Gnufhl ior
clean up and graffiti removal in the Light Industrial Area. The Light Industrial Area 16
bolll.'1ded by Hastmgs to Powell Street and Commercial to Semlin Dnve. For the past two
years, Goodbye Graffiti bas wolked in the area and successfully cleaned it up, They
perfonned a massive graffiti removal and now just do weekly monitoring of storefronts
and alleyways removing any visible graffiti. There bas been a noticeable difference m
appearance and cleanliness in the Light Industrial Area.
Sincerely,
-
41~~~~~Oh-~
Stephanie Williamson
President
2401 Eost Hastings St.. VO~J\JVer, Be VSK lV8 Phone: 604-215-2401 FQlI; 604-216-0991 smail: hostingsnorthbia01eM.nel
APR-22-2005 09: qa FRO'l: GO:J:EYE G<i'FFITI
6046B44784
TO: 13037855363
P,7'7
JanUlUY 31, 2003
To Whom It May Concern;
Ke: Goodbye Gnffttl
Woo 12!iO !iaIlenT_. w-.,
rMOI 1OIIlhA-M
s.rr,.1lrilioh~
c..a m sn
T........... (tot) "1-4111
-.~
Goodbye Onffiti bas bf!en mRinhliJlin& a zero tolerance of graffiti OIl many of our Ihupgties for the past
rour years through their Bver Oean Program_ On c;ertain bni!4ip8l' where we bavc had exposed. porous
substrates. they hPe applied a ~ CIIIcd OP 1000 IIId this ha allowed us 10 .bave Goodbye Graffiti
do :apid mnovaJ& w~ still maintaining the original, pristme look of nW' jlfOJlCdics,
We have no hesitation in J1lCOI/I~adi~ both thcic Eva' Clean ~.....llIICI the use of IbeiT GP 1000
coating product.
Y OUIS l1'\lly.
(,."OLLIERS MACAVLA Y NICOLLS INC.
-
,..
/ Barb mJien:, CSM
Senior Property MRn"B<<
Real EstalC ManapJCnl Services
Direct Line: (604) 661-0834
BL:cp
c.ehn -1 1 ~.....-..
("'~ ~.~_....... &..Serw.5Ira ._
l'lcn_m_I.41___
-----..-....-..-------.........-..-..
-..-...--.--.....--...........---
APR-22-2005 09:"18 FRO'I:6lXlBiE GRR'FITI
6046844794
TO'l303?85'53G3
P.GI?
SEP ~9 2083 16:39 =R CB PJCHARP
u..' ,....en
CBD Itic:hard lis
ClI1c.....,4 ~I~. .,
I '0 ,11011I "..""" ... t
K",,00
lie....... WI< ,,1I04'IUt
Cl! 45.5'~ "
as tin 6'61 ~..
-- .....-.
ScpU:mbet 9. 2003
To WhOllD It May C~
We "I'IOW4 lib to.... ~of ow time \ooft'er ow ~miOP of Goodbye
<JIafDtJ .
Si...:.e they ha" beeAOD<!ite p<<formiD&.,amu n:movaI.lItIIi ~g(I. of pafIitt
J$$b'1aJll cnatir,g'. their ~ IIa lIeel1 01IlSlImd1l1i! Good-bye GfafIi1i anives lj'l ..
vay ~ aud pl1t~1 ~1e wbCD _ say 1bcy Mll unve. they bsYe
~,.,,1at.JY RS1IQ,,-e.,i lPfiiti tbou&bl ~:,jlP"f ~'ICP' of pn<< ~ ~ acd
fhay cIepaZt IeavmS dIolJ --.. flee of pdliti. ad clcbri,.
We Il'C Yery bappy 110 ~d.isco....04 ~ C~- tlJ bay. ~ thev
s'vu Cl::ao Progra. It has made . bi.& dl.iJtt~ m1be ov:nll appe&li1DC8 of 011I'
shoppiDg =net and ~ bcIieV8 it 1m .:wally reducc:d the 1IlC1IrIaCe of &rdIiti lagS.
S~,
-
Br.d 015011
Scior Real Estate MaDapr
1'f'R-21-201l5 13: I!l8 F'R(J'\: I'COJBYE ~lTl
604G844?84
TO:13e37ts::)':)~
P,l'o
--
-
CITY OF VANCOUVER
ENGINEERING SERVICES
Streets Administration
Graffiti Management Program
May 20, 2004
Goodbye Graffiti Vancouver
Suite 105 - 950 Powell Street
Vancouver, Be
V6A 1H9
To whom it may concern:
The City of Vancouver has had a contract with Goodbye Graffiti for graffiti removal
services OIl aU city owned property since September 2002.
Goodbye Graffiti's removal practices and qual~ of work has been outstanding,
On behalf of the City of Vancouver, I would not hesitate to recommend this
organization to anyone who is lookir\! for a graffiti removal contractor,
For any further inquires please feel free to contact me.
ag
Gra ti Management Program Coordinator
City of Vancower
~: 6CN-87'....
FtVl: fJH.117J-72f1D
Jas......".....e.;ry._.bc. ca
feCN
-
453 W. 1Zth Ave Vancouver, Be VW 1'14 tI' 604.sn.7011 lax: 604.873.7100 www.dtyvanc:ouver.bc.ca
APR-22-2005 09: 48 FRO'!: GO:IJ8YE GRf"FFITI
6046844784
TO: 13037855363
-
B.C. PLACE
STADIUM
June 29,1001
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Re: GODdbye Graffiti
As one of the largest sites in the City ofVancouvcr. B,C, Place Stadiwn is extremely vulnerable
to vandalism mc1 in particular graffiti.
It became an overwhelmioa problem that was impossible to keep up to and it was obvious that
assistance was required.
Since Goodbye Graffiti has implemented their ever.clean program. B,C Place Stadium has been
graffiti-free.
Their quiclc response and regular site inspections have kept the building looking fresh and clcIUl
each and eVeEYday,
Sincerely,
-is n .
BrilllGriV ~
Manager, Sladium Operations
B.C. Place Stadium
m ~c B1wd., Vancouvrr, B.C. Canadi V68 4Va Tel (6(14) 669-noo Fax (604) 66'.3411
Current Event 'nformaliol\ (604) 66'-7373
,. Division altl.C. _ c;o.poration. & Cr_ Corpomiofl of th. ,_ aI IflIi'" CoIu_
A
P,S'7
-
APR-22-2005 09: 48 FRl:J'l: GI:I:DBYE ~lTl
60<16844784
TO: 13037855363
~.q'r
.
,..
__I
--......
17et~
..... WA IIltI
~1A7_
- r ---'iIlt'
lUy 17,2004
o..SlirIJl' ~
Wo Juwoe 11M .. p1 .... III! ~1"fitc'i- of ..... wi1b ~ 0n8IIi to Wp ..
cIIU. with our ........ aaaltl PIOblcm. BeiDa a -~ v...... ill & cIIIdnL ~
_ - .. DIIW BrdBIi daily IIIIlI It Is . SUlIUIa lilt ..,,.. 011I' Or~"'" ....
y.... I _ tall ~....veIy .wo4OI\!'e.n DfN arU&i wi.. tie""" awDa1t1e
10 'Ibem.
Goo6)'e GAftiti hila UDlIt....... die mMIiv. pojcc\ vf l_~J pBiIi CIIl tbe majcllity
of '* ~.... _ .. booeD .... 1Ia tlmO\'C tile p.md CIOIIIpIeWy. 11liI. IIDt GIlly
....~~..... to.. blat to GIll' ,.......... ~ . Wfln_
w. ... ... .... 1M DC -............ to iIMIlMi . UlCrific:ial <<'..... .. Gar pftiras
..... wMb~...u...
-
1 ROl""''''' ->4 Goo""" GndIki tD od.n -1IIeir psfIiti 1'ODl)val.......
!:I,' ......
.. 1__...."
~
F...~D.:.~ otpl......... A ~
~ s.moe.
APR-22-2el05 09: 48 FRll'l: GCOJBYE ~ITI
6046844784
TO: 130378:)5363
ANGELA Y.M. LEE M.D.
INCOR.PaRA TED
U3.. fR~~' Rl[1
V^NC01IVDlIIC
C^~D^
V5V -+G3
Tn. (6\H) 117902#1
r Nl (604) 1fN-2-103
Goodbye Graffiti
Suite 105-950 Powell Street
Vancouver, Be
V6A IH9
Dear SirlMadarn;
Thank you for you help with graffiti removal, Both funes, the results have been
excellent. Steve's work is very impressive - the walls look like new. Thank you
once again for your professional services.
Sincerely,
t-'..:s'(
-
APR-22-2005 09: 48 FROM: GlDJBYE GRFFFITI
6046844784
IU: l~.j(~:>Jbj
~ .... D."..."...1It Ltd.
1203 -1M22 1SS-Street,
...,.,., Be v...._
Phomr. (804) 5.. ..a Fax: (604) .....182.
Match '4. ZOO~
Goodbye G/wIffili BulWlY
21029 3/8" Avenue
Llf'IgeY, Be V3A8N5
Re: SeMce CqJJIract
Oear Stal't
-
We WIIh to cammend you on yocIr~1ent ~ and ~ wifh reg8(d '"
selVlclng ollr 1:Of1lrKt. Ful1henncn. -llIJ1Pl'8Cia18 the prof8sslonal ~ In Mlich you handle yOur
liIlCQunts and WDUId not heGltat8lO I'eGOmmend '/fNr company.
s~, -.L
~
Manager
.....c. I
City of Wheat Ridge
Community Development Department
Memorandum
TO: City CouncIl
FROM: Alan White, Community Development Dlr!7tor ~
Tim Paranto, Public WorKs Director 1 ~
SUBJECT: Public Improvements
DATE: April 27, 2005
This subject was brought before City Council at a study session on January 31,2005. At that time
staff presented the dilemma it is faced with in administering conflicting regulations. These
regulations are contained in the Building Regulations (Chapter 5) and in the Zoning and
Development Regulations (Chapter 26). While the conflict in the two codes concerns how much the
City can require for escrow, the primary issue Involves whether to require the construction of public
improvements (principally curb, gutter, and sidewalk) in conjunction with all new construction.
Council dIrected staff to look at alternatIves and present them at a future study session.
The Larger Issue - Who Should Pay for Public Improvements?
-
It IS difficult for staff to develop alternatives WIthout the overall policy being decided. The question
that needs to be answered is. Who should pay for public improvements - those who benefit, or the
City at large? Or is there some combInatIOn of the two?
Policy Considerations
. The current escrow system is cumbersome and sImply is not worth the time to admInister it.
· Construction may not be feasible or practical with all new construction
. The payment In lieu of construction has a simIlar drawback, except the City can hold the
funds in perpetuity.
· Chapter 10 of the Code of Laws empowers the CIty Council to create speCIal or local
Improvement districts for the construction of sidewalks, draInage, and storm sewer systems.
· Exempting all constructIOn from the construction of public improvements burdens all
taxpayers in the City. Construction of public improvements is a given with most major
proJects and developers expect it. They increasingly ask for some amount of public subsidy,
however
· Should every street in the City have curb, gutter and sidewalk?
Alternatives
There are three basic alternatives
Require construction or payment III lieu of construction of public improvements
2. Escrow funds for a penod of years to provIde fundIng of public improvements
3. Do not reqUIre the improvements
Each alternatIve has pros and cons.
AlternatIve 1 raises the question of equity. Currently, someone building a new house must pay whIle
the rest of the block has improvements Installed as part of a future City capital project. There are
practIcal difficulties In constructing improvements when they don't connect to any other
improvements. If the City were to embark on a program of construction by assessment of costs
through special Improvement districts, equity would be maIntaIned.
AlternatIVe 2 is the system we are under now. The same eqUIty Issue arises In the event the City
ever uses the escrowed funds. CIty staff has to monitor the escrow for up to ten years. Owners are
extremely upset when they are told they won't receive any interest on the funds deposited with the
City.
Alternative 3 lets new construction off the hook. There may be Sizeable Impacts of a new
development, and for the City to construct the improvements is unfair to the taxpayers and, with
larger proJects, unrealistic The 500-foot measurement to exempt properties IS, as far as we can tell,
arbitrary
Recommended Action
-
1 The City Council should determine the priority of curb, gutter ancl/or SIdewalk throughout the
CIty.
2. The City CouncIl should determine what, if any, share of publIc Improvement costs are borne
by the City. City participatIOn may be different, dependIng on the level of development or
kind of development.
3. Staff wIll develop options to implement the City CouncIl polICies for presentation at a Study
Session
STUDY SESSION
May 2, 2005
Item 4,
- ~~
....- .--- --' ,--
MEMORANDUM
City of 'W'heat. Ridge
Department 01 Public Wurks
TO:
~~
Randy Young, City Manag
FROM:
Tim Paranto, Director of Public Works
DATE:
April 25, 2005
SUBJECT:
Fleet Replacement & Service Interval Schedules
The City Council, at its January 24, 2005 City Council Meeting, requested that the City policies
concerning fleet replacement and vehicle service schedules be reviewed by Staff and the
results discussed at a future City Council Study Session The attached tables and graphs
provide a comparison of schedules available from a cross-section of area municipalities
The most pertinent information regarding fleet replacement intervals was found in a survey
conducted in 2000 by the Rocky Mountain Fleet Management Association Unfortunately, the
contents of this data reflect only the maximum number of years before replacement, and do
not include mileage and other criteria. Data regarding fleet service intervals was obtained by
telephone survey
-
Recommendation for Fleet Replacement Schedules:
Based upon the information obtained, it is recommended that the City's current fleet
replacement schedule remain unchanged The City's current replacement schedule is similar
to other municipalities surveyed and uses several guidelines, including age of unit.
While not discussed in this memorandum, the leasing of fleet vehicles has been reviewed
periodically and found to be more costly than purchasing vehicles, and not generally practiced
among governmental entities
Recommendations for Fleet Service Interval Schedules:
It is recommended that service intervals for all marked police patrol vehicles remain at 3,000
miles The survey indicated that three out of the five municipalities serviced marked police
vehicles at 3,000 mile intervals
In light of the survey data results and higher vehicle standards, it is recommended that service
intervals for all un-marked police vehicles, light, medium and heavy duty trucks and vans and
administrative sedans be increased to 4,000 miles
While the preventive service interval for heavy equipment is less frequent than the
municipalities surveyed, a review of repair records does not indicate unusual equipment
failures associated with items serviced during preventive maintenance It is recommended that
service intervals for heavy equipment remain at 250 hours
Q)
~ Q)
Ol
~ :2
0 r:r
0 m
'" E Q)
.S! Q) .c
u .S1 $:
J: '6 .
'"
> a.
.
'" '0
u c
'0 1Il
Q. (jj
... c >
.2 1Il 0
< ...J
'" ..It: .
.S! () .
" :::J
.:::, '0
" 0
'" Q) G> 0
J: .S1 .!:! ~
u
VJ '6 ..r: Q)
.... CL G> ..It:
c: > 1Il
'" ...J
E .... 0
0
'" ~ .
u Q)
.. >-
Q. .~ 0 Q)
m Cl Qi
'" "- III 2!
- Q: ~ -
.... .!!1 nI <.9
'" .~ ()
'" 0
;:;: E
'0 .
- 1Il ~
0
r:: Q) <3
0 .S1 Q)
'" '6 ~
.;:: a.
.. Q)
Co E
E E
0
(J '0 0
Q) ()
~ ..It: .
....
'It 11l
1: E .
...
'" c Q)
J: :::J '0
(J , 'S
... Q) 0
.. .S1 !Xl
In '6 .
a.
>
:J
en
<lJ
()
o
Q.
'0
<lJ
..It:
....
11l
E
cb
.S1
o
a.
C\J
~
o
co
CD
'<T
N
o
(SJeaA) arnpa4:>S ~uawa:>elda~
~---
~ ---
---------
~-------
_------'1'-------------1---------- \
.--------r- - \ '
lJl
..
<3
',i:
..
';:>'
~
:3
0
'E
:3
~
; \
';;:>
.r::. \
'"
':i
...
0
- \
lJl
(\)
:;
'0
(\) ,
.r::. i
u \
<Il \
-c \
.. \
'E
..
- u \
OS
0- ,
& \
i
,
~ \
(\) \
~
- \
0 \
c \
0
.'!1.
...
OS \
Go
'E \
0 \
u
'" \
""
1:: \
OS \
.r::.
u
...
OS
!Xl
\
\
\
\
\
('Ool 0
'<"' '<"'
--
c:
(ll
:>
':;2
o
:;)
~
z:;-
:;)
'0
C
:;)
'0 Q)
Q) !(j
~ -~
iO
Q)
.r::.
~
.
'0
~
;;00
3
.
'0
o
o
%
~
...l
o
c:
(ll
:>
'%
2-
--
z:;-
:;)
'0
!::
en
'~
G)
()
',C
G)
-;.
'0
~
o
01
G)
iO
(,)
~
Qj
Q)
(;
o
z:;-
'0
Q)
()
...
Q)
c
c
o
(,)
.
~
:;)
oJ> 0
c: co
~ .
Q)
oJ>
Q)
:>
.~
....
oJ>
c
'E
~
('Ool
<t
tS1ea]..) a\Opa\\:>S lUaU1a:>e\da~
~
(;;)
~
c:
~ 0)
%~
t\)o.
;:'S
~
\
'iii
~
(5
0)
o
~
U
t\)
to
Ul
~
u
'Z
Cl>
,.
~
~
Cl \
;>0
~
ell
:x:
..
0
-
Ul
Cl>
~
'0 \
Cl>
~ \
(j) \
"C
ell
6
ell \
u \
..
- 0. \
& \
~
Cl> \
~
- \
0 \
c:
0
.~
.. \
..
0-
6 \
0
u
~
-C \
..
s:-
U
.. \
..
to \
\
\
\
\
\ \
<l' '" 0 <f)
<D ~
~ ~ ~ {S)-e3}.) 3\Op3\.\::lS )U3Ul3::l-e\d3'ti
--
'0
Q) ~
(ilQ)
_'0
? t\)
.g 3
4:
s'C
Bot\)
<I> 0)
.....-'0
U ~
t\) Q)
/,~
(ii~
....,
\
\
0)
'"
'0
~
(il
~
~
.
"0
c:
~
0)
6
...J
.
'0
o
o
~
-'&
...J
o
1D
di
0)
(5
o
~
(.)
0)
U
~
0)
E
E
o
(.)
.
~
'3
o
to
.
~
.~
".
....
o
~
o
'"
Cl)
to
(.)
.:.. E
0) ?
o.?
Q) U
0) t\)
~~
~~
Q) .-
~~
Q)-'6
~O)
E
E
~Q)
?'O
'OC:O)
~i9><'
t\),,:c.t\)
0) U
~?
;;
~~
?'"
'0 .S Q)
.,..."'-
.,.. I ~
t\)""- W
Q)u
-;I:S
------------/
-
~ Q) Q)
Q) z:: 01 01
01 '" '0 '0
'0 it i2
i2 ? <" <" <" en en '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t
~ (") (") en en \!) (") ~ en en <'" ~ <'" <'" <'" <" <'" <'" <'"
~ 'B Q) Q)
Q) s::. s::.
s::. '" ~ ~
~ 0-
&
~
'12
z:: '0 '0
;, '" c c
C ? (I) 0 0 to 0 \!) 0 0 0 I"'-
(I) ~ 0 0 0 0 (i) 0 (i) <I::J <'" <'" <"
(i) I"'- <'" <" ~ <" <" <" <" <" <'"
<" 3 ~
:>- 8
3 '" ...J
0-
'"
a:.
~
. z:: '0 '0
'0 '" 0 0
(/) 0 ? 0 0 0 0 0
<i 0 ~ 3- \!) <I::J
~ ! ~ '<t <I::J \!) <I::J <I::J en en 1.0 <" <" <'"
~ ,,; ~
~ 0.) ~
Ul '" ...J
...J 0-
~ &
I- ~
~
z::
~ . '" ~ ~
~ ? 0
<a ~ (i) <I::J <I::J <I::J (i) <I::J <I::J 0 <I::J <I::J <"
Q) E- (") <0 I"'- <I::J \!) Q) Q) <"
Q) .... ....
...J .... t C) C)
Q.. C)
'& '"
0-
W &
~ . ~ ~ ?:
?: '12 <3
~ <3 z:: 0
~ '" Q) Q)
0 Q) ? () 0 0 () 0 0 1.0 \!) 1.0
() ~ 0 0 .... <0 .... 1.0 1.0 <" <" <"
~ .... (") <I::J <" <" \!) Q) <" <" Q) <" <"
Q) E E
~ E 'B E E
E ~
I- 0- 0 {3
0 & 0
'Z. 0
0
(/) ~
~ '12
z::
..... '" .... ....
Q.. Q) Q)
~ Q) ? '0 0'9. 0 0 0 0 0
'0 ~ 1.0
0 '<t \!) 1.0 \!) '<t 1.0 :; l"'- I"'- <'" ::I <'" <" <" <'" <'"
:; E- o 0
0 0 t co co
co '"
0-
'"
a:.
~ --
~ ~ ro c:
~ (II
Q) E <) Q)
'0 "c, E <3
.~ <I> ~ ~~ 2 :> ~ tJ
Q) Q) c: ;> g> c: <) :> Q) c:
(II ~ ._ (II Q) <) t Q)
;.. "~ '% <I> ..... (II ~
'0 ~ ~ E
.... "ro Q) Q) ;> ,,:, ,,:, ~ <I>
0 '0 Z, ~ <3 <I> ~ ? <) <) (j) (j) (II ~
~ l ~ <I> b' Q) <) Z, ? ? E 0 0-
to c, ;> ;> ? ?; Z, z, ~ 0- ~ ...J S
0 '% % .~ z, Q) ~
01 E "E S ? ?; ?7 Q) Q) '0 ~
Q) (II Z, ",,'0 :;j ? ~ ~ ~ Q)
"'iO E c: '0 :;j E (f) <Il "':> E '0 '0 <) .!J1 0 ~ 0
? (II Z, "c, (II r: Q)
0 , . Q) Q) Q) Q) '0 ? ;- ;- Q) Q) ?: 6 "6 '0 U
~ Q) E 1: "6
g <) <) <) g (II (II Q) Q) ~\ ~
-0 -0 ~ - - -0 ~ 01 ~ Q) Q) z, tn Q) -e. (II t9
0 0 .~ ~ ~ (f) ...., <:( co l-
n. n. n. n. n. n.
c:
o
~
o
o
<Il
~
....
c:
Q)
E
Q)
~
c:
(II
'Z
....
Q)
~
U-
c:
.~
c:
:;j
o
'Z
~
<)
o
0::
'Ii
'0
~
:;j
'0
c:
o
<)
".,
Q)
~
:;j
<Il
o
o
Q
~
c:
o
0-
:;j
'0
Q)
~
..0
.IS
(II
o
.
-
Q) ro
Cl ~ l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l
"C Q) Q) Q) Q) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
ii: - .- .- .- :::l :::l :::l :::l :::l :::l :::l
C E E E E E E E E E E E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
-
.... Q) .s= .s= .s= .s= .s= .s= .s=
l'lI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Q) u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
..c: .~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l{) l{) l{) l{) l{) l{) l{)
~ (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') N N N N N N N
Q)
(j)
ro
. ~ l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l
"C Q) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
C C -- :::l :::l :::l :::l :::l :::l :::l :::l :::l
l'lI - E E E E ro E E E E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gi Q) - .s= .s= .s= .s= .s= .s= .s= .s= .s=
0 0 0 0 c 0 0 0 0
> u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 .~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l{) l{) l{) l{) l{) l{) l{)
....I "<t "<t "<t "<t "<t "<t "<t "<t N N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Q)
(j)
ro l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l rn
. ~ .s= .s= .s= .s= .s= .s= .s= .s= .s= .s= .s= .s= .s= .s= .s= .s= .s= ro c
"C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C '"C ~
0 Q) ~ ~ c 0
0 C .s= 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q) Q) ro
~ - C E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E C a. ~
Q) Q) 0 Q) ~
..II:: U E <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 Q) '"C
l'lI .~ .8 .8 .8 .8 .8 .8 .8 .8 .8 .8 .8 .8 .8 .8 .8 .8 .8 u l/l 0
....I Q) .~ Q) c
(j) (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') .C S
Q) ro
(j) > :::l
ro
. ~ l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
>. Q) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Q) c -- -- -- :::l :::l :::l :::l :::l :::l :::l
Gi E E E E ro E E E E E E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Q) C .s= .s= .s= .s= .s= .s= .s=
Q) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
... u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
C> .~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(') "<t "<t "<t "<t "<t "<t "<t "<t "<t N N N N N N N
Q)
(j)
.
>. ro
~ ~
0 l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l
Q) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l/l l/l l/l l/l
Q) C -- .- :::l :::l .s= .s= .s= :5
0 - E E E E ro E E E E E E 0 0 ro C C C c
... - .s= .s= - 0 0 0 0
Q) Q) 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 c E E E E
E u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
.~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
E (') (') l{) l{) l{) l{) l{) l{) "<t "<t N N <0 <0 <0 <0
0 Q)
0 (j)
ro
.... ~ l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l l/l ~ ~ ~
Q) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Q) c - -- .- .- :::l :::l :::l :::l :::l :::l
'"C - E E E E E E E E E E E 0 ro 0 0 0 0 0
::J Q) .s= C .s= .s= .s= .s= .s=
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
III .~ 0 0 0 0 l{) 0 0 0 0 0 0 l{) l{) l{) l{) l{) l{)
"<t "<t "<t "<t N "<t "<t "<t "<t "<t "<t N N ~ ~ ~ ~
Q)
(j)
Q)
~ x ro c
Q) >< ro ro
0 ro E .~ Q)
c E U
..c: c Q) Q) ro
l/l Ol -0 ::J
Q) C ro ..c: ~ l/l
Q) > c c U :::l Q) C
> > ro c - 21 Q) u :;; (j)
- ~ '"C ro -"" l/l ro ~ Q) W
Q) u , , E Q) Q) E
0 '"C Q) > -"" -"" > l/l I-
~ Q) ~ c U l/l :>2 :::l U U , , '"C Q)
~ >- -= ~ ~ ro 0
'"C ~ ro Q) u :::l :::l Q) Q) E a.
Q) <: ~ > :::l >- -= -= a. a. 0 z
ro c ....I E
g -"" -"" 0 ~ -= '5 Q) Q) 0
~ E E u - > ~ ~ Q) Q) ~ '"C <::
ro c -0 S 0 :::> ~ >- '"C ::J ::J :;; :;; Q) :;;
.... E E ~ '5 Q)
l'lI :::l ro (j) E -0 -0 l/l l/l U li1 0 ~
0 , , -0 Qj
Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) C ::J >- >- Q) Q) ro :::l .s= 0
.~ .~ u _2 .2 .2 E :E > > :::;- u -"" '"C U
'"C ro ro ~ ~ u ro
0 0 0 Q) Q) t ro
0 0 0 '"C rn Q) Q) ii5 ii5 ro ~ ~
CL CL CL CL CL CL <( :.::J ~ :r: :r: -, <( CO <.9 I-
(j)
....I
~
0::
w
I-
Z
W
o
:>
0::
w
(j)
I-
W
W
....I
U.
U.
o
W
....I
III
<l:
I-
Z
o
(j)
it:
<l:
CL
:!i
o
o
c
.Q
l/l
:~
o
l/l
C
o
~
~
Q)
a.
o
>-
.n
>-
Q)
~
:::l
l/l
Q)
C
o
.s=
a.
~
2
l{)
o
o
N
2:-
ro
:::l
~
.n
Q)
U.
C
o
a.
:::l
'"C
Q)
l/l
ro
.n
'"C
Q)
ro
o
FLEET REPLACEMENT GlJIDELINES
The current fleet replacement guidelines are based on the age and mileagelhours of the unit Old age or high
mileagelhours does not mean automatIc replacement, but instead tnggers an lnvestlgatlon into all reasons for
replacement. The following hst of reasons are used in determining if replacement is warranted.
REASONS FOR REPLACEMENT
I High and/or rising maintenance/repair costs.
2. High and/or rising operating cests (fuel economy).
3. Excessive downtime.
4. Past useful service, technological, or economical life (see definitions below).
5. Parts/service no longer available.
6. Federal, State and/or Local requirements render unit not legally usable.
7 Overall mechanical condition.
8. Overall physical appearance.
9. User distrust and/or dissatisfaction due to perceived unsafe condition of vehicle based on high mileage.
10 Poor utilization (unit too big/too small for job, seasonal use only, etc.). A unit that has no other deficiencies
other than poor utilization will be moved within the fleet rather than deleted, if possible.
DEFlNITIONS
$en-ice Life:
Refers to the amount of time a unit is capable of operating and rendering
service. This life may be nearly infinite if the unit receives adequate
maintenance and worn out parts are dutifully replaced.
'Technological Life:
Represents the relative productivity decline of a unit when compared
to a newer unit.
-
&oDomiclll Life:
Refers to the length of time that the average total vehicle cost is at its
minimum. The economically optimum replacement point is reached
When average period costs are at a minimum. (See illustration below).
r-
en
o
o
-------....-----.......----...-....---...--...-.....-...:c;.;.:;;:<,.~
-_.--
--'
-- .
...-
-..---..,-..
.--
n~
Decline in resale value
Operating and maintenance costs
Average of annual costs to date
-
FLEET REPLACEMENT GUIDELJJoo.'ES
LIGHT DUTY VEmCLES (UNDER 8,600 GVWR)
Description BourslMiles Years
Patrol Sedan 80,000 miles 2-4
Motorcycle 30,000 miles 4-5
Sedan, van, small truck 80,000 miles 8-10
MEDIUM Dm VEmCLES 8,600 TO 10,000 GVWR
Description HoursJMiles Years
Van, truck. cab & chassis w/gasoline engine 100,000 miles 10-12
Van, truck, cab & chassis w/diesel engine 150,000 miles 10-15
HEA VY Dm VEmCLES (OVER 10,000 GVWR) AND REA VY EOUIPME:'IT
Descriptioll HourslMiles Year
Dump truck w/plow and sander 150,000 miles 10-12
Street sweeper, mechanical 10,000 hoursl30,OOO miles 8-10
, Street sweeper, vacuum 8,000 hoursl30,000 miles 8-10
let rollder (sewer cleaner) 10,000 hours 12-15
Articulated loader 10,000 hours 12-15
Backhoe 10,000 hours 12-15
Gnder 10,000 hours 12-15
Tractor wlimplements 10,000 hours 12-15
Noles: These repla=nent guideline figures are an average of the figures currently being used by other
municipalities, thn modified as needed to reflect the low utilization of some equipment (same hours/miles with
extended years).
-
City of Wheat Ridge
Office of the Mayor & City Council
Memorandum
5,
TO' Mayor & City Council
FROM: Larry Schulz, Mayor Pro-Tern and Lena Rotola, Council President
DATE' April 26, 2005
SUBJECT: Study Session Topic, May 2, 2005 June Town Meeting
The Junc Town meeting is scheduled for Monday, Junc 6th, 2005 at the Wheat Ridge Recreation Center
at 6.30 p.m. Topics for discussion include
1. Draft agenda (to be distributed at the Study session)
2. Council member assignments
3 Update on postcards
Please contact eIther Lena or Larry if you have any questions.
-
pa:pa
City of Wheat Ridge
Office of the Mayor & City Council
Memorandum
TO:
Mayor and City CouncIl
FROM.
Council President Lena Rotola & Mayor Pro-Tern Larry Schulz;
City Clerk Pam Anderson
DATE
May 2, 2005
SUBJECT:
June Town Meeting DRAFT Agenda
June Town Meeting: Potential Agenda Items
It is important to remember that the Town Meeting is an opportunity for elected officials to communicate with the community
The presentations should be by elected officials as much as possible. The citizens want to hear form you! The reports should
be very brief (a few minutes at most) so as to allow for as much time as possible for questions and answers. The entire
presentation should not be more than 45 or 50 minutes. The topics should be distributed among the elected officials, and once
the agenda is set time limits can be determined.
Welcome and Introductions: Mayor
II. Strategic Plan Update (2 Council Members)
A. Where are we in the process: Vision statement. goals
B Timeline 2005 Agenda
C Importance of continued public involvement
III. Sales Tax Initiative: Mayor' Thank you to citizens for support "What we have done"
A. Public Safety (2 Council Members)
I Introduce Chief Brennan
2. Police Department Assessment and Police compensation plan
3 Recruitment and Retention issues (Balancing costs--- higher salaries vs. training costs for recruits)
B Economic Development (2 Council Members)
I NRS
2. Sales and Use Tax Education program
C Parks/Public Works/Seniors (2 Council Members)
I Large Item Pick-up: dates & details
2. Weed management program
IV Elections (possible charter amendment issue)
V Question and Answer
Other Update from City Manager on 1-70 W proposed development
ItImYUBID IDllJm
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
Municipal Building
7500 W, 29th Avenue
6:00 p.m,- 7:30 p,m.
Mav 2. 2005
0t Mayot'~eJ;'ly call the meetif'lg to order,9t"6 30 p m ~Council mprfibers pres~
.~~ (Karen)*rry,; Jerry D~lio;1Nanda Sang, Dean Gokey, Mike Stite{" Larry SchuG, Lena
" Rotola, Karen Adams Also present: Randy Young, City Manager; Tim Paranto,
Director of Public Works, Dan Brennan, Chief of Police, Alan White, Director of
Community Development; City Clerk Pam Anderson, staff
MINUTES OF
April 18, 2005
Motion by Mr DiTullio to approve the minutes of April 18, 2005, seconded by ,carried 7/ (1.
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
as printed.
Item 1.
Staff Reports
(1a), Unnecessary Noicel Disturbing the Peace Ordinance:
Police Chief Dan Brennan presented a staff report on a proposed ordinance repealing
and re-enacting the Unnecessary Noisel Disturbing the Peace Ordinance Discussion
gqd questions f<?IIQwed
~~UV1(,lA" '~~L\.,{. :t"li
'-'r , I .)
Direction was given to Ill" (l.Jlil SL ?'" 1'-"-.9",,-----, L"l-\. \.d..l-'-..' .tLI V
\) r l,c C( <v" .
1b. Joint EOC with the City of Lakewood: (
'::,. \ e\ru.-
Chief Brennan presented the staff report and options on the topic of a joint Emergency
Operations Center with the City on~e. U::ck..cu..'CV?l'
If{~-c>
, c \ ,'VI,
~ '/\1..l:t,/l.+--- .
C'\J.lV'" ..._-_...~----
/
V\ Y tv,~i
~; e.-L'(--" ^,~ \.....'-- <'
ItS A
J (, .J',t ,\ L, \ ".'" ". ~",
L . 0
l' -,' "_
'- L, '.:x:..C (- ':....':~
d.. ~ ' '--d <--L C~
\'-V
c,
~uG
V\,\~C
(, .~ v'\..~~"-- l'
"j'''d..A.-
--{"l
1 "0 <c <-' .( (
t. '- \.- -
f
'-'c'~ \"" '\il-,ct
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: July 8, 2002
2
(C,')\ II J
"- V\..~ ()..Q tc 0V--
~~
\ C-x ~<CLJ' ~ ' t'~",j[
C~tt~
Direction was given to Chief Brennan by City Council to
Item 2.
Community Graffiti Response Plan
Chief Brennan presented background, current policies and procedures, and proposed
alternatives for a Community Graffiti Response Plan
~tI 0'\-zeQf) i-LC0'{\A.'V-.I:~~",-,::~"v,- ."~ ~'-'-- C~~t)cc\t-l ~Q/ p~''-'-^- '~''--'
VVlcl"cle_v (U\2IC\'l\i:c'\\Ct.( (Vv~:r) ()lQf~I'tVf'1(OilS t'" I,,-\h' !"-~ /
l 'elf 0.lCc:" lC\ Q\ ~J' ',- (."j '-\-7 q,,- L... - h
J \) LJ \J l' i , '\ '^-'" U L ,,~[L~i") \::t.,.\..t.,," '.. (\/~-'c, - ~,~,:. I \ '
L ) ~
)~CuL.~')- i\c 1j)h~-~ ILL iJv.-,) c, o....J L \\---, , I. _1 (i L
i \ U J I) ~ ""-C'I ~ '-l'_-'..~ ) fC)"<l ,-' (",,- l'V\;\ ",^J'-~
ct 0, v ) ~ ,\ L C ro<:'V,- _ J
, 'I, '-Y\-' (,
v '') ,
~'-::. c \,~-:)-Tv~ \r,\\.c uJ~~ ~
6,/-> ,\,
i
~ ~ ~')W^V(~ 4-
L
~I~ L ,-4
I
~j
Vv'1.
.--,
-"; ~\, \X., ::,
'--"
4 -f'c-L tA,JlLV-- \1';: c e.,
"
l-LL\.-d
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: July 8, 2002
"V v:~= c:;: 7 ~o. ~QJ'%.C
~ \ ~~\L\ V--y-t..AVNl'-V- ,''l, A ~L 1 I;.~,-h ,'-~ -t,
3
II~~
C)
CS'CCir
*:~", \'v,' (~G)
Item 3.
Public Improvements
Alan White, Community Development Director, and Tim Paranto, Public Works Director
presented the staff report on this item This issue resolves around the conflicting
regulations in Chapter 5 and Chapter 26 of the Code of Laws regarding what the City
can require for the construction of public improvements
-l\\~1 \,J-,t,,~
A discussion followed on the policy and administration of pubic improvement policies
L__~ '\,; \~,/-....
') ~c "lL \. t K fL i1v~'-,- C~~ v,-j
,--l ,; ,( -..v-C <,
lee LU -t
liiY)l ..
rl ll.-C
~ e(e
Ct .Jr' .re ) j r'f-{.-~-r-
() .(sc\ ~i0
L ,'LH v
\
, ' ,
10('" ~i, ^
" ,-," C>\'__.v--
k\tv~
\l~
~/
ii' ",( Ita ',_ { \}~~
It "Vloe.., DeelY "'" (t \' J
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: July 8, 2002
4
Item 4,
Fleet Replacement and Service Intervals
Tim Paranto, Public Works Director, presented the staff report on this item He detailed
the review of the Fleet Replacement Schedule and Service Intervals and the
recommendation of staff regarding the policy
I ~G .-
lo' .~);-
ll,(j,~
j,Lv 0-A' il'
!.---,,--{,'-L</"
,-
'\- \: ~\;,.(
\'>-t'. c c.../
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: July 8, 2002
Item 5, Discussion of June Town Meeting
Mr Schulz presented the draft Town Meeting Agenda and discussion followed
5
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: July 8, 2002
Meeting adjourned at.
, \' i(") \'\. .~~
~.~
Pamela Y Anderson, City Clerk
APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON
BY A VOTE OF
Lena Rotola, Council President
6
to