HomeMy WebLinkAboutWA-16-07City of
" Wheat �idge
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29`h Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857
Approval of Variance
WHEREAS, an application for a Variance was submitted for the property located at 11335 W.
33'd Avenue referenced as Case No. WA-16-07/Quail Hollow; and
WHEREAS, City staff found basis for approval of the variance, relying on criteria listed in
Sections 26- 115 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws and on information submitted in the case
file; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has provided notified and posting
pursuant to Section 26-109 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws; and
WHEREAS, there were no registered objections regarding the application;
NOW THEREFORE, be it hereby resolved that a 4' setback variance for the western property line is
granted for the property located at 11335 W. 33rd Avenue based on the following findings of fact:
1. The variance request would not alter the essential character of the subdivision.
2. The request would not be detrimental or injurious to the public welfare.
3. The orientation of the house to the west will provide more privacy for the hose to the south.
4. The variance will accommodate the new owners who have physical challenges.
With the following condition:
The home is built in compliance with the site plan and architecture included in the report.
www.cl.whentridge.co.us
City of
h6a-tP,:iid
e
�g
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
PLANNING DMSION STAFF REPORT
TO: Community Development Director DATE: June 3, 2016
CASE MANAGER: Meredith Reckert
CASE NO. & NAME: WA-16-07/Quail Hollow
ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a front setback variance in the R-1
zone district
LOCATION OF REQUEST: 11335 W. 33`d Avenue
APPLICANT/OWNER: Dillon Hall for Quail Hollow Patio Homes, LLC
APPROXIMATE AREA: 20,487 square feet
PRESENT ZONING: Residential -One (R-1)
PRESENT LAND USE: Vacant
ENTER INTO RECORD:
(X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) ZONING ORDINANCE
Case No. WA-16-07/Quail Hollow Patio Homes I
JURISDICTION:
All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to
make a determination regarding this request.
I. REQUEST
The applicant is requesting approval of a variance to the front yard setback minimum of
30' in the Residential -One (R-1) zone district. The purpose of the variance is to allow
construction of a custom home at 11355 W. 33rd Avenue. (Exhibit 1, Aerial Photo)
Section 26-115.0 (Variances and Waivers) of the Wheat Ridge City Code allows that the
Director of Community Development (Director) may grant administrative variances from
the strict application of the zoning district development standards. Administrative
variances are allowed for up to 50% of the development standard.
II. CASE ANALYSIS
Property description/history
The subject property is located on the west side of Quail Court and north of W. 33'a
Avenue. It is located in the Quail Hollow Subdivision which was platted in 2014 and
contains twelve lots. Lot sizes in the subdivision vary from 15,000 square feet (subject
site) to over 22,000 square feet. Zoning for the subdivision is Residential -One (R-1), a
zone district established to provide high quality, safe, quiet and stable low density
residential neighborhoods. (Exhibit 2, Subdivision Plat)
Four of the twelve lots are currently being developed with large custom homes. Homes
in the subdivision have footprints of at least 3500 square feet and are valued in the
$1,000,000 price range. (Exhibit 3, Site Photos)
The applicant wishes to construct a new single family residence on Lot 11, which will be
addressed as 11355 W. 33rd Avenue. The R-1 zone district requires minimum setbacks of
30' from the front property line and 15' setbacks from the side and rear property lines.
The applicant is requesting that the western property line be considered the front with a
4' variance to the 30' minimum front setback or a variance of 13%. (Exhibit 4, Site Plan)
The proposed home will be a single -story, ranch style with a walk -out basement and four -
car garage designed to meet the needs of the homeowners. All other requirements of the
R-1 zone district have been met including lot coverage (19.7%) and building height (24').
Because this particular home design has a four -car side -loaded garage more vehicle
maneuvering space is required than a front loaded garage. (Exhibit S, Favade
Architecture) In addition, the buyers are an older couple who specifically want a ranch -
style home with fewer stairs, requiring a slightly larger footprint.
Case No. WA-16-07/Quail Hollow Patio Homes 2
The property is 20,487 square feet in size and is configured as a flag lot. Access is via a
driveway that extends north from 33rd Avenue roughly 150'. The buildable portion of the
lot is 13,521 square feet in size and abuts a large detention pond and Lena Gulch further
to the north.
In the zoning code, a flag lot is defined in the zoning code as: A lot which is situated
such that the front lot line does not abut a public street. Primary access is by a private or
privately shared drive leading to a street. The front lot line of a flag lot is that property
most parallel to the street from which access is gained.
By this definition, the front lot line of the subject property is the southern property line
which is parallel with W. 33`d Avenue and would require a 30' setback. The applicant
has requested that the front yard setback be considered the west side and that the south
property line be considered a side yard, reducing the setback on this side to 15'.
The house as proposed has an "L" shaped configuration with the "living" area of the
house pushed to the north to take advantage of the views to the north and west. The
four -car garage is side loaded from the west, is single story in height and extends south
towards the south property line. Due to the turning radii needed to get in and out of the
garage, the approach to the house feels more like a "courtyard" rather than just a
driveway. The entrance into the home is recessed roughly 45'.
The proposed orientation results in a more logical relationship not only to the access
drive, but also to rear yards of properties in the subdivision. With the proposed
orientation, the side yard of the subject lot will abut the rear yard of the property to the
south providing more privacy for both homes.
Staff concurs with this logic and is therefore, processing this case as a 4- foot front yard
setback variance on the west side of the property where a 30 -foot front setback is
required.
Adjacent zoning and land use
Properties directly surrounding the subject site on the north, south and east are all located
within the Quail Hollow Subdivision, and are zoned R-1. Of the twelve lots in the
development, two are completed and four are under construction. In the broader context
beyond the subdivision boundaries, surrounding land uses include the Applewood Baptist
Church parking lot to the south. Vacant property abuts the subdivision to the west. Lena
Gulch and its regulatory floodplain abut the property on the north and single family
homes are located on Quail Street to the east. All of the properties adjacent to the Quail
Hollow subdivisions are zoned R-1.
Public Notice Response
During the 10 -day noticing period, no written comments were received in regard to the
lot coverage variance.
III. VARIANCE CRITERIA
Case No. WA-16-07/Quail Hollow Patio Homes 3
The Director of Community Development shall base his decision in consideration of the
extent to which the applicant demonstrates that the majority of the "criteria for review"
listed in Section 26-115.C.4 of the City Code have been met. The applicant has provided
an analysis of the application's compliance with the variance criteria. Staff provides the
following review and analysis (Exhibit 6, Applicant Letter)
1. The property in question would not yield a reasonable return in use, service
or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by
regulation for the district in which it is located.
If the request were denied the property would continue to yield a reasonable
return in use. The property is currently vacant however a conforming structure
could be built on the lot which meets all development standards.
Staff finds this criterion has not been met.
2. The variance -vvould not alter the essential character of the locality.
If the request were granted, the character of the locality would not be altered. The
proposed house is consistent with the size and style of the other houses in the
Quail Hollow Subdivision. Variation of the house orientation will create interest
and uniqueness expected in a custom home development. The reduction of the
setback on the west side by 4' will not be discernable.
Staff finds this criterion has been met.
3. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property with this
application, which would not be possible without the variance.
The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property which would
be possible without the variance. However, the reoriented front fagade design and
garage layout could not be used and the house would likely have to be multi -story
which would not meet the needs of the buyers.
Staff finds this criterion has been met.
4. The particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the
specific property involved results in a particular and unique hardship (upon
the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of
the regulations were carried out.
This is one of the largest lots in the subdivision with over 20,000 square feet of
area but it has one of the smallest buildable areas of 13,521 s%uare feet. One-
third of the lot area is taken up by the long driveway from 33 Avenue. The
average lot size for this portion of the development is 17,200 square feet.
Case No. WA-16-07/Quail Hollow Patio Homes 4
The rear property line is at an angle which presents challenges for home
placement on the lot. In addition, properties located on a cul-de-sac bulb are
allowed to have a reduced front setback of 10' to compensate for oddly shaped
parcels. So while this is considered a cul-de-sac lot, the reduced front setback
does not provide any advantage for home placement.
Staff finds this criterion has been met.
5. The alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person
presently having an interest in the property.
The hardship has been self- created in that a smaller home or a home with only a
three -car garage could be built on the property.
Staff finds this criterion has not been met.
6. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare
or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in
which the property is located, by, among other things, substantially or
permanently impairing the appropriate use or development of adjacent
property, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent
property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or
increasing the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or
substantially diminishing or impairing property values within the
neighborhood.
Granting of the variance would not negatively impact street congestion, fire
danger or the public safety. The slight decrease for the wester setback will not
impair adequate light or air to adjacent properties. The request will not have a
negative effect on property values.
The proposed home layout with the single story garage appurtenant to the
southern lot line will allow more privacy for the rear yard of the lot to the south.
Staff finds this criterion has been met.
7. The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request
are present in the neighborhood and are not unique to the property.
This lot has the smallest buildable area in the subdivision which has created
challenges for home placement and accommodation of a larger garage.
Staff finds this criterion has not been met.
S. Granting of the variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a
person with disabilities.
Case No. WA-16-07/Quail Hollow Patio Homes 5
Granting of the variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a person
with physical challenges. The buyer is an older couple who wants a single -level
ranch -style home, which will be more accommodating than a multi -story home.
Staff finds this criterion has been met.
9. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set
forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual:
The Architectural and Site Design Manual does not apply to single family home
construction.
Staff finds this criterion is not annlicable.
IV. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Having found the application in compliance with the majority of the applicable review
criteria, staff recommends approval of the 4' setback variance from 30' requirement for
the western property line for the following reasons:
1. The variance request would not alter the essential character of the subdivision.
2. The request would not be detrimental or injurious to the public welfare.
3. The orientation of the house to the west will provide more privacy for the hose to
the south.
4. The variance will accommodate the new owners who have physical challenges.
With the following condition:
1. The home is built in compliance with the site plan and architecture included in the
report.
Case No. WA-16-07/Quail Hollow Patio Homes 6
Exhibit 1 - Aerial Photo
Case No. WA-16-07/Quail Hollow Patio Homes
Exhibit 2 — Plat Sheet
QUAIL HOLLOW SUBDIVISION
A SUBDIVISION LOCATED IN TH;E SOUTHWEST 1/1 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 SECTION 2B, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANOE 69 WEST 6TH P.M.
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO
PAGE 2 OF
c,i �1S .e' .c~ •rci ro�',f:',f+mr... �. .f.Y,rG.eG...'.nriwf.,c ,G..rca,G_
► .3
A..F.
w GMM 1I irM 1---ti='mar sJ
.rr.1uPo�
74 --- ------rcorvG----- s m� . w-----'-... Iw-r._--------wLwn------------jlGGaTAfl
L.
I
�eap��'
��Tr,''�
I rt
--J L----� --- L - - - - - -- - -
- k
\ \ ` �' mss• ` rwn Goru.wi n �;u rrr � --
I } 1 '� _ •Y a G _- - a.'Aa rower i _ I
I 1 YJ�• aGM N R. i nfw Iry
(IOW
� . 1 �',+<.e. 45 4 1 � / (I I I `,�.ofami„ r i �a� .'�..• ;`...w.°' � � R� � N
> "Af-,•,,•�""'� ill 4 � � I I I � I �moY�`>r ""moi wn`.r ... i � � pt �
� / ryr vrf
/ f..,.. 11 41aaA-,� _- • .JI I I .r.' rr ,.' wvY.�sr fkS[jb�
M w
SKi� i e,Am s[I_ `fl ,`
jL•1; 15jj li 4 w.r..f I1 r i N.h:l 1 MM I
E I I MY.R wo.% • K � Ra. w n. f.r , I I r,. „ ��
II rrG----�M•'a I --- - - - - --
--I
I I Gwa •mower ` p Nrf o ww• w.aw. M ur rr f 5 na`N R '
r �... ..5• f � 44Y Win qo t w N n •\ �xrtt A
.fbta I
Z GGmRRr+. rnw ��.G��p.� IfYTI'Ifl Mac n. , 1 b, .CV N'.Yr
nA fi x:e�rw tia �,
Subject site
Case No. WA-16-07/Quail Hollow Patio Homes 8
Exhibit 3 — Site photos
Case No. WA-16-07/Quail Hollow Patio Homes
Looking north
toward the subject
property
Looking northwest
at adjacent vacant
property
Case No. WA-16-07/Quail Hollow Patio Homes
Home under
construction to the
northeast
10
Exhibit 4 — Site Plan
CITY OF VVHEAT RIDGE
I rtpwdc WaRpte—
PLOT PLAN
ED) A ME
D 11g,
41-2
Vo' -'R, 195,u i TrA i
J.
A31W
IIIs
clucK
A
433;3
T
ALIE 'EAR
GAfwA
5431 1.,
"sm -'-4 'steps it ?-
is=
SJ
ATCHLINE
SEE SHEET 2
jCCAf;7 . - !'• If-, Wt tr5rA MAN,#:
G: Chj, f,-
pgo3,r Tte rmL
'm ELr'o4?13N5 4W *ArrC r.% T,,f
V.v I
IZ'Mcinhard
rume �003ODrtF Sl.
-
LDT I'
QUM 1411"OW
C, T, 0" We' or%. COUWTY or jurremem
0004(ft 11196 W 3990 hlr .
Case No. WA-1.6-07/Quail Hollow Patio Homes
]Cc
WAR +3'
61K is'
T.
11a.11 --Z 14 DAY
YAW. -L-DMI-Ln4:
0c. WMI ;IUM9-25X
N DETAL-c
me *D. C34104:0DI
I
nDat_ -, ,eil 4, ery
DIAWN 1-; JL&
Is'l 7-
11
7
a■
PLOT PLAN
MATCHLINE
IZF SHEET 1
I
I • I I _ I,
I
II
I
I 1
I I
I I I
1 WE 33RD AVE. \1
i
r
uC1:a..c vv_enmtun
+c u,-rz Orroor
Cr 5-.N �,ur, s+s>_Y[N,.
10J ia� r.A.L S"
Z
MS PLD' M --N DEnc : P �P.n:jp
1-9 Pr, pr, c4pNtD 5P0'
ur-"k fm AK MV('ur rw r
wMG4TJtV'S. rV+1 iDVSIR.i IiCM
�•• vawv
W►L MOI1011' SL:nW,04
0:ftS Hu=nom: rLAM
�rd,
Manhc
NEI
DVR1 r_Strt no MiSrYaGlq
LE64L DESCRPTON
e►cKs_
Lor 1,rwa.+�
sd
OWr. HD,LO,r 3.ODMIDV
P-0 IV
C'11 Or WHE47 IWQ, COuim or irrmnor
5,w. it'
*094t33: 11336 0. SSIE •NSMA
SLALr FA."
JDO MD_ cSN.M% I
DATE !/a/r{� KV
N�H/poy
OAM 0T. filo
!�,I Ty' '.CP i
Case No. WA-16-07/Quail Hollow Patio Homes 12
Exhibit 5 — Fagade
Architecture
East side of home
South side of home
Case No. WA-16-07/Quail Hollow Patio Homes
West side of home
North side of home
Case No. WA-16-07/Quail Hollow Patio Homes 14
Exhibit 6 — Applicant letter
May 26, 2016
Meredith Reckon
Wheat Ridge Flinn ng Dept
ISM W. 79' Aw nr p
Wheal $tone, Colorado MJ33
RC_ Quad Hollow LOP 31 varrancp Request
Dear Meredith.
The purpose of this letter is to request a variance from Rhe required 30' froni yard set -back for trot 11
The home that was drstgned for the buyers of Lot 11 was based on the sat -buck requ-*ernents indicated
on the approvad Quall HMsow subdivision construction drbwtnrs. 7 hese dr.awing5 we• a apprrrrpd bV the
Cttp of Wheat Ridge on oil 16, 2014. We have relied 0n these app-ovpd Orawnigs for all horses that
haw bpm designed. constructed, or sold in the Quail Htdlo%, subdivision to date. 9 of the 9 homes
submitted to the City for review have born apptuved based an these same setback Imes The custom
hOf"e that was designed Far the buyrn of Lot 11 "ten6s 4' into the required front yard setback,
requiring a 13%, variance. Inc altarlird plot plan depicts the specihc location of the infrirwernent of the
front of the house. Our to th4 phvstal Iocdlion of thA lot and the configuration of She home. however,
thorn w -ill hr nn riq,306* impact 10 adjacent IotS Ofneig htioring proprrtie5 as a result of this Set -back
vananre being granted. 11 is the intent of this letter to explain why thnc varygte is necessary, and 10
dernOnstrale Plata maturity of the City's varlance review- cetera have been met.
The custom home de5rgned for the buyers of Lot 11 has a unique fi,cico pldn and both th a frOriq 011he
tv" find detached 4 -car garage face towards the west. the properts. contiguous to the weslern
Property line of Lot 11 as currently vacant land. The set -back hop along the western property liar of lot
11 fids always been shown as 15' and we have no record of ai►y correspondence from the City statim
that a _V front yard set -batt rs reQuired in flits Incatim. The unique phy%wal shape of lot 11 cOn biried
with this larpr ser -back requirenie*it has crratod a particular and unique hardship for the soon -10 -Ise
awnars of this lot. The elderff couple purchasing Lot 11 has already invested over $230,wa into this
home They hire sold the- previous home and have ma ved into a small dpadnwnt while thei await the
corosplE6011 of cons Irurtion. Thr hardship this larger front yard set -back has created for the, elderly
couple has not h"n dnne ter any person present of havlrag an itleresI in tho property
A, i he home drsi ned for lot 11 6 68 6' 110m the hnrne.on lot 10 and 56 S' from lire foome on lot 7 loo
which somrig would ahow for 45' and 30', resprctr.*IvL the encroachment of the hotrw on tat I 1 pas,
the front set -back hire will reit he, impair the appropryle uw or drrviopment of these or other lots in
the common ty, nor will it impair the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property We are
coniident that the grartlmg of thes varianrp will not alter the essential character of the Quail Hollow
nechborhood. bit rather will eManre d Additio-tally, the variance would not be otle-nental tc the
public we fare Or injurious Oct other properly or impro opmerots in the neighboncicioa In fdcl, allowing this
variance will help tis preserve and protect the propertf. v-alues of the homes wittwi the neilghborhgp d L+i
maintaining the serni-custcim Wk and teef that was rote-ided for and K expected of Quail Hollpry.
Case No. WA-16-07/Quail Hollow Patio Homes 15
We appreciate your rpvipvp an{) tomideralron of this vdriamLe request_ tt is Our QClire to provide lh8
highpse quaky hormes an the rnoal attractirw cornn►{,r+ity possrdle. It is with y Wr help that v rp (.#,i
accomplish This goal. Slroutd vau have any q,,w suons regarding this regk*est, plena reach out to u5
directly aj 7Za4U-16W. We ksok forward to yirur appeoval.
sincerely,
QVail Hollow Patio Nornes, LLC
Attarhrnpnr 5urnmarv.
I Exhbit 'A" - AiVron-d C )mtructinn Drawing s howirg iii iding setbacks
2. Exhibit '8'- Colored lot Layout showing the 0a 0wIrti for lots 6; ?,,,)and 11.
a. Build 'W reotprinh
h. 1uildir%@ ist-bar-k 1,nos
C. property l Ines
d. Oimens+ons from Build.ngs to Properly iirr_.:
3• Exhblt 'C-- P10+1 Flan for lot 11
Tabte 1, A+djWewt Lost Setb m* Tabk
p►ewidrd EYceads % EMceeds
lot 6 Rear Setback is, 35.0' 20.0.r 133%
Let 7 Res. 5ltbeck 15 41.5.
Lai10 Rear $etbwck is, 177%
' __- 53. G' _ 3$.5'_ 257'91
Case No. WA-16-07/Quail Hollow Patio Homes 16
I W
II I
I I � II ti I
1 u �
I YVLrcx aEM r/
I YDDFID 6' 9)ErNK SEE
I f// QUAILSTREETmcauauaua:.+I
FES \ —�PRAMkII
(PER UST DAIa) RAMS M
I I I EIOSTNC Wa� TO
—
10713 Ll I BE REMOVED (TYP) I
-
r PROPOSED NO 1`4iINGI
_ I WARROW)I 1. I
TICK GEM OOPED W/ L 5' DET" 1 1 I
_ SIIElYL1C
DETAIL SNEET 20
/ \\\ RETAI WLOe WX HEIGHT /
f
(REFER TO rnucava�
FRO`C4D HEADWALL (T MAX HEIGHT) TO BEI,• i - / I I EXSTNG CLIL
BLU
I I BY SC11GIN
AI ENGINEER (REFER '.1 I I / roil( REY01m
I I TD Swxnxm RN6) S DRAINAGE ! Uil1TY I r7 c�
\ II I
3
7Z--
O DRUNAQ 1A!
EASFTDIT REC /20061im21 I
I •5= — — — — — --1= UNIT— — ——iAt!-'9 `7:'--o>}'EOj — - — — — —LLL—LLL_.•. Pk0bSFD 46P
ARM
I
SIGN (Nwwff
V1 —
LOT J
\ \\\ U11IY
M MNL m T 5' SIDEWNR, SEE
11Y
\\ \ \\ ��. • T IAT r VAESIIT EWSISI NG IRIDES I I L -0f 1 ..�/ DETKIFT:"
\BE RE HOSED O/M II n �b� //: 'Y /nr l!'MNL! C 4t/IIT TYPE m ■l 3,
// YSTAIO i
\ \• ` - � �1 � IL 10 MEI' \\\ \ I I ( � r j �/ /'- PIANS Y-808-1
Ew
wr x Wn •ra•v wares n a .aa+A x aars< nsa�n r w vri x me s ..
even w o anwaa
A
L.
I I ORIGINAL SCALE: I'- AO HORBZ,
II I LEGEND:
so -CLT Elclsw
A9NFALi Ott �flL
TO BE Rwal m
STOP SIM MP
FDOT TYPE TB HANDICAP RA
(PER YIDMO
$TAP-46 M-608-1)
El/S111G BUILIZG
TO UC RElafim
PROPOSED NO PARIONO
f - SIN (WaT ARROIP)
1g. Ll ETISIO TREES TO
BE RELFO140 (TIP)
PRW= WAOVU (WS IUXFQGfT)l0 BE
DESIGED BY STRUCTURAL DOW I EFTR
TO STRUCTURAL PLANS)
DOSING TREES TO
BE FOA M4D M
�ftsom -No-paw—
SIGN
OPAf w—
S1a (BOTH -
I I
PROPOSED NO �ARYNO
`SIGN (¢0TH DRECMNS)
I I
I� II
PROPOSED 4001AAR BLLXX
EB:TANINC WALL. 2.6' MAX HEIGHT
(TO HE DESIGN BLED)
RIGHT-OF-WAY/ — - - BOUNDARY
LOT
LOT LINE - -
E]ISTNC CURB-
AMGUTTER ------
PROPOSED CIM
AND GUTTER
WILLING SEW."
BGLONG SF LRACK
-
EASEMENT LINE
—
EIISTW TREES
019)TO
BE REMOWD
E)OSTNG BEES
-
PROPOSED STOP SOI
ASPHALT TO OE IEMO.TD
PROPOSED PAVEMENT
100 YEAR FLOOORAN
EXISTING NETLANDS
9 1149-0.
9
4__ M
--►
LE�
id'An°' B,Ai D—
RqM A- R1 -1
RTIW
30-X30'
NO PARUINO
2NIr
STOP SIGN
OACKWOIID.71701W pHVADLTa AphYM
SOFOFR AND SYMBOL:
'
1177 p"ED LTAY)rprrwlwA
NOTES:
s' sIDEWALN / SIE TXT
ApFr �AL�
ULR' E91tT m i l• I f - 11 1. ADLSr ALL Y/iMOLE; vKfEs EPC TO FINISHED GRACE.
EE GET 5
APPLEWOOD 2 ALL REMOVALS (TREES. FENCES. POSTS, SIDEWALKS. CONCRETE. ETC) AND RUBBISH
\ �• �• T\ ,` — w1Trx WWI 97
r MODIFIED 5
SET BAPTIST CHURCH SHALL BE LEGALLY OKOSFD POF.
WAIT' COURT - y -- _ T DE1� SWEET 20 i 1 FYiK PAVEMENT DESIGN TO BE DESCNED BY SOLS FNCILEER AFTER OYMOT
to' ORANI ! lOT ! R R gtlplG NAS BEEN CQFTE7FD,
UTNTY EASEIfI/r. I a70T Tl,IK M FIA RAID L. SEE LANDSCAPE PIANS OF PROPOSED FENMC, PLANTINGS AND IDENTIFIER WE
\� IEC (N0611262Y. _ J \` T g011 Mi rt 1 S - - (POW 41 2B F4AN5 Y-605-1) DETAILS.
�:y I SDRAIL! I -) - -
STOP so
\\ 1� S ALL SCRs SHALL CONFORM TO YUED STANDARDS AND SPE6ICATION&
SETT
r PROPOSED z7 , ` 'SANl S ORAL ! N ^' / q/Ft - I - - - - - VERTICAL S' SIEWn L/ ���L N N I j �I� _ •PARSED 6' Bim! ANET PC AYING
1RIC-AL. FMCAIIa. CTC sLETVfS (CONdlis) SNRT HE IISTN.IID PFMR
VS UTUTY ENT (TV'P _ Z I YT DET y(�� 2!1 I IO ULAII �1 Ra 9a (BOTH aR6:cnaS)
7. EASFLENIS MA1 ARE TO BE VACATED AIE MOT $HOLM Fa ttFAMTY
a I QIjQ. _ }I I uTUTr E9Er (Tw
\\\�< ' f ♦ 1 I ' '�` Qlt (nn I I ' j1 B. NIM RAMS ARE SH M1 FOR ULSTRATIYf PLQPM ONLY.
. � SIMV 2D I I 20' SAW ARY LOT i g 1
\ C y9 \f,YA r``ZV 1AYM Fart I 15 ,_T. I 9. TRACT A CONTAINS A REWLATED ROOOPLAY AND IS DESIGNATED AS A
I I ,■I I NQF-BLLDADLE TRACT THAT 9141 BE WVITAM BY THE FOA A QWUU
ww $a n 1A 5 IU DWUL R - - r f
fC . I �. _ / II RIDGE. OWER THE aBRETY OF TRACT A 6 GUNNED ro TLE QTY OF MEAT
�\ \�'\\\ I •. y \ , /i - LOT 7 - - I UR1TY ESR (TTP) I AOGE
\ \ .1 .. _j. \/ / / / I I II.M A rt I jI I I 10 TRACI B CONTAINS A S70151MTER DUALITY OEIEIT" MEA THAT SHALL BE
N, LOT
ROOOWFFSMTA'. VIR
���_ MI 10' `Y ES IT DETK BEET 20 I I IS GRAM ED M THE FOA A PIPE A R EASELENT 0148 1FE ENIIETY OF TRACT 0
UIIY E91T YODFED i 90EWN1C 4 II 6 (71.W1FD 70 THE dTY OT MEAT RD4E.
iNN M n - - - - _ I . _ _ - I11. TRACTS C AID D ARE OEDKAIED AS P1Hlt RCNI-II-MY. F AT A NTUEOIS I MIE ,HE GTY MSEs ro YAI-ATE IE TWLT C AWO D RIdfT-P%WAY. TRACT C
J - J I I PaL BECOME A PMT OF LOT 10 MO TRACT D MLL HECQIE A PM7 OF LOT It
l IIVIYE -- -- I II
III 1 �S 12 TRACTS ENO F CONTAINS L NDTAPE UTILITY NO aN1ACE EASF]ERiS OMER
- I —1 I i THE DMETV' OF TRACTS E NO F. TRACIS E AND F MLL BE YNITNED BY THE
\\\ \ T6 SANITARY SIMMER *- '.� Z k \ )r1TC SETBACK I - - SDC HE18�L I $ I
\ \ \'tikSE E)NT REC )D912BD fff I� u '.. I �-. I J
I I E I FOA TRACT D 16 FOR IE PROPOSES DF DRAINAGE AND WILL i[ IIANTAWED BY
` �.\ 1 _ _ 4TBA0( / I I THE HOA A HE CITYE EA'I07 EASEMENT OVER THE F]FSEiY Q' 7RA4T G R
•O GRAN. ! tO AN. ! O ORAFL/ I I I GTIANTED ro TFE OTY Cf MEAT RDOG.
UTIITY ESYT (TTP - - - - UTV ESYT UTILITY QLM GET (GYP) II
20
T / 1 11 ALL ADA RAMPS SHALL BE CWT TYPE m LKESS OTFERIOM NOTED a BESE
SEDC SETBACK n.0 II n. __ -SEE DUAL SHELF I RAMS
TRA[T6 \ I ECORD DRAWING
ILimit rt
\ \V I 17 GRAIN. /j
\` :\ \��\�� �I ._\•. . V\ �, - P�^: "" _ . 1W x n. V\ I BLDG SE— R mum WIN SS MET
MAXIMUM BULOIIC COLFRALE ffi
1 T 1 I
YNLM IAT AMA 12500 SQUAWME FEET
ATOP II E
SETTMIX \ I i5 16 MFI11W LOT WIDTH 1W FEET
\ \\\ MARK BISHOP, P.E. N0. 26988
\, \ - - — — — \ \'A-� - l►l ]>4$/_W�i Vii,' —_ — — — q'''••......:
\ .. JEHN ENGINEERING °fcssloK�\ �18A0�
WATER WN3TY FO p1ANAa ! UlUT1' FRONT 30 FEET
PERYMENT DRAINAGE ; POW A PROPOSED MOg1 M LOO
EASEMENT REC. QroBum2t I HEREBY AFFIRM THAT THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR OVERLOOK
-
—EASEMENT AEC �AI19721 (aQ,rDWARp HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED IN SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE WITH THE MAR 15 FiFi
RETARMC WALL- 3. MAX HOOT
I ELEV=5419_-) (10 BE OCSGN 9") CONSTRUCTION PLANS APPROVED SIDE (MmSOR) 15 FEET
I j ` BY THE CITY Of WHEAT RIDGE. SIDE b DIMCENi TO STW • 30 FIDET
I
• 50% AEDUCION PER arY OF M07 MC£S APPROVAL
IJV OV C/
Lnlk r
M1y ~ °
� � fs•� .8s'o=lx.ss's � � � � �
n'n 83S18 1 °
HOiJOd
Fj0 i I fs'ft c
.01V '0 t0 f£ L'fZ
�d �6.6� —*' ed r tie £LT£ Z Z
.p't1
30VdSIM"O MCC
I �
1N3W3S` G
(3DVN3no0 %O'Zz)
I A'
A'S 668
ltv Ari b (o0'td HOaV
LO 8 lol now Sol-33)
n U � i oz'sc-vS=.�j
C:ICL o "' C0'*CV9=dol
I ao iivno 58cc
V£ NVld
dNif7
rl-
00`~ %0.01 A•9L Z•9l
A - x
Cd N XS�
ME fs ff •6Z
OLL dd `v c0,_ lL'6Z o HO80d c .� .� h ^ n
N 1
697C
,t — O
N ZS
Z LLL L ( p 1101 W �.j 0
c
N07QN N ° ° o
�n I Km
'T O ' v
LL' _.. .. - i1 Q U' C'S U)° ° a Y9'Z
_$�` 61 CL N bl d 101 d
x �z�--� £'zs n .£'LL o N ° a °� ` rs °
%9'oZ I %0.9 Yo'ot v
-�-- 04 ,�__ SS'9z u� ,00.001 ZL'LZqm '06
LLI
Mf ...n
.. I .f"9 Q Cw.O ° n
Kr) m nie .7 K N O co I I ALL' Q XLLJ 00
N N N O O N I r1�U O OwM�Cn W U n N N
N O r9i N '7Q W Q ^ MroM >co "� o
co � w F 16 Z r7 A C) W 6Y d � , n
�a�o pa g3� urn0 c0 O _.
6 �00x M^ I o 0 aLO ,Or� N r�z Yobe �aO
w aU \
3 971 Q cQQ� cr�� cn . I 0 s - -j W
o U Q CL
LU N I W � d 6
_ _ o I �, U)
\ w N F " h
o < La1 ,f OZ ,L'tti
` \ r rn Q �.� C9 ,L'C n ° ° ,0'Sl ' I � o .S'OL Y0'Ol XB'f
N Z p of N Wi. — — — — — — — —
\ M LnNW ° I %et-------%oot o o �� e M
a�
r".)0 :� WLn ° °
0 c6
CJ a O L, ^ W Z
Q' U) ~ Q� '� W .0'L W o 10 lV N
\ CO
Q rl F II((q���� K
_ ° O
Id-
1 O n Oz ° O ° No°
10 °
`r ` ��
6
bt
O N
N
04
Y00' l
7.
.V
N
I �W o
CoQ I �V) w I F----
0'tM^n oW ZO (� V
n�
^O I I ^p o��o I � 111111111 M J
Iz z
------------J------I�\Q J
—-------- —J ��`o 0 U")000u7
r
� o
') la U
o w C? : 0.Q CO .= r O � _ 3 -2
N 2 0:N .. O
o a
,o "'—c'ilir 3w I - r (,� . Q C o Z M < N N \
= U a. cv m
N N No N 6y!.•/,fit/!irilit!�ii��• `� OO ,W .A
W
N �/O0 Z O�
N O<O l- Q
0
0'9 L
,0'66 xc•s IN o
Safi — �0�x LL: w
W rl „�� I .O-� N U F-
3.5% ; Q0,�yya N �. I �00 Z dZZ W '^
Z \ C 4! W N 1 LO J �� w NOO V!
q ^ .9 L et Q i/j F-
(6 I cp M p (/) z Y
.c a lil tO (7 O N ' O H L i N> Uj V
Q $ W �- I F- crQOZ W m
` \ rn Q C� C'f ¢'OZ 0'Sl N I N O m m J 3 O
N N Z 0 N 1 i.. .LTZ c Yi'LL t7 U w N a o W M in
G. M���U)w ° ° ° ° o ---- Z r'Z a `n
` r)r7') > h U ° p F Q30 n i-
226 .o9 Z r7' � N 0 J ,; ° °� I R Q 0— w Z z tY
O 7jx \ W �3W
110 Lli
- �f- d °� ° ° ° m U WNL~ o Q 0
h ° n W 4_ Z U d' w
\ ct'd UO0L n LLJ J W ° N n° �� — Z �0=� W LY N
W N O) .OL ° w ° ° ° 1 ' a�QZ N
0 ... W D: °
W � � _ N
a �_ O r7 W �N U ° I N w w ►�
Wm n ° I-!R�Q ° ° ° p HWOO W
•� n Q > Z
r
N° 0 O
d O ,07 O ° n ° I 0 (n
`�- 9i O , a POI c ° ° ° ° I L
° W.N o z o W�
I m LLI p0 LLI
l -LU
Z
IJO�
NLLJ
O
w W
o
o
\ \
0
U) U
U
z
N N
_
— —I�LL�I
d ' L
LAJ
Y/
Z
a Q
L.LF
o o
V M
cx
p tl
J
m G
wap
c
J
3
U' J
Z
Q
=)R
0 U
a.
LO
N HLO
Z
LLJ
M
3o
.,i C,tiC.00 N
�wv>
z
O
w
OBD:
O
w
J 2aaQ
w�
Q
IEU
3ui
Qp
a0�
_ 2 F� N
Z .d �
{/� U
N d r
Q
-
•- J O W
w
�5
aL3
�00
H��
O Q F 0
waw
O
/
-i CY
o No
Z
N
.oi.i.
OWYSZ-f-9LOZ A38 0N10V80 - LL 101 00'1000HMHSO\NVId i0ld
MCA
OOOHMHSO\:d
-----------------------------------
0
---------------- — —
�o
/ N
/ N ,� J j
/ r _ Z jo tis U
,F-( 3 vi
Z
00 rOi J O U \ }
0-1 2 U a_ / = N m I p ^ O
Ln
F' W Z
a a m .yc
O J
0 T- 0o O (-)
O C r_
LL w O Q O
a. t/1 O D
—z
800
�000 i w o
�I F- f--
LdOZ
' / I w tal�Op N V1
Q Q z�>Z
Q F- WQm< W m
a. i p N 3 WMA
----------- z r��na o N in
I p Wao0 z rr
O Q tJ a-ZJH w Z p a ui
w
dN N 0 OOOU j w
n =n " M z wO2w � !� a' m
J aaJ�
Fn ww
Q. ,19•9-0L 3 „90,0-0.00 S _
aZ v~i
��
LiJ SJD �
'a� o W I p Hwou w
°i o O
N
° w totr
W4 o ° ° af
O z w
Z — — — — — — — — - — — — —
W W 0 O w
WI ° _ xS °� ° ° N N ° W ° ° °-� ,Qj ° CI1 N V
J
D a_ Z0 �V D a
c K ° °° �v V Z O p
C cii I ° ° Ilkp U J = to U rr
c� n Z aQ �� w N M
xoo Lao _ 3
Q
L9 OLS M „-02,-0x.00 N — — — ` w a z �N C7 N vi
o p U d Z W a
z w Z J 3
W
.3'a N O ~OM� 2
3 a Q U a 0> = w N
IEU
<Z �- p
u� a N U O V) J O W
Lu F�OJO Q ��� p•' j H �
O O U a
ZN
Id Oti:L 9IOZ/*/$, OM0 9Z-i-9LOZ A38 ONQV8O - LL 101 00'1000HM HSO\NVId l�OMO\ L OOOHMHSO\:d
City of
�Wheat d c
'OMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 298'Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857
LETTER NOTICE
May 20, 2016
Dear Property Owner:
This is to inform you of Case No. WA -16-07, approval of a front yard setback
variance to the required setback of 30 -feet for property located at 11355 W. 33rd
Avenue in the Residential -One (R-1) zone district. The attached aerial photo
identifies the location of the variance request.
The applicant for this case is requesting an administrative variance review which
allows no more than a fifty percent (50%) variance to be granted by the Zoning
Administrator without need for a public hearing. Prior to the rendering of a
decision, all adjacent property owners are required to be notified of the request.
If you have any questions, please contact the Planning Division at 303-235-2846 or
if you would like to submit comments concerning this request, please do so in
writing by 5:00 p.m. on May 31, 2016.
Thank you.
WA 1607.doc
+++++s.ci.+cheatridge.co.us
Site Plan
Site
AIL
fr
APPLEWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH PERRI RALPH J II PERRL DEBORAH A
11200 W 32ND AVE PO BOX 1562
WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80034
[,� � -�(, - D--�
QUAIL HOLLOW PATIO HOMES LLC
6143 S WILLOW DR 300
GREENWOOD VILLAGE CO 80111
♦ A i submitted E
City Of planner. � In.
" W heat Wiidge be accepted
LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION
Community Development Department
7500 West 29th Avenue • Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 • Phone (303) 235-2846
(Please print or type all information)
Applicant it111,uAyvx L- totS r i1e. Phone ?2A. 116e . 1600 Email I3L@ C/�ff.✓ �oEGa++.«w. c4,
Address, City, State, Zip 6/Y3 Y. Ae. 5v,14' •'.or („iCW,,.ft,0ao tacos, co Porn
Owner ti Aw- Attw fA7u AoteJ', ztC Phone -,7Zo. N88. /60o Email SAmy, y Ago✓E
Address, City, State, Zip M".-- As Adov--
Contact Wwrr tl*" Phone moi.. Y?.?- --J-49 t7Email
Address, City,State Zi (L.tF�fiotEco�►+•�N�rraf �^
p 5Aw.O- R -f H[3•ygc
(The person listed as contact will be contacted to answer questions regarding this application, provide additional information when necessary, post
public hearing signs, will receive a copy of the staff report prior to Public Hearing, and shall be responsible for forwarding all verbal and written
communication to applicant and owner.)
Location of request (address): fl3s,3— W. � w�T ,�rv6,� t o goo 33
Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request):
O Change of Zone or Zone Conditions O Special Use Permit O Subdivision - specify type:
O Planned Development (ODP, SDP) O Conditional Use Permit O Administrative (up to 3 lots)
O Planned Building Group O Site Plan O Minor (4 or 5 lots)
0,Temporary Use, Building, Sign O Concept Plan O Major (6 or more lots)
D Variance/Waiver (from Section 26- '±S-) O Right of Way Vacation O Other:
Detailed description of request: lftmyice grid ugir fear, _70, f e -air Y4ft Sep ---,e4,4<
%IZ Y0% vi /P77%ft/he<o GA r ONc Y ZZ'Cs �F Go T w.�1�►
56r /tirAcv7Eo L erre —
1 certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in
filing this application, 1 am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above, without whose consent
the requested action cannot lawfully b accomplished. Applicants other than owners must submit ower -of -attorney
from the owner which approved of th1h action on hiskhalf_f� ^I KATHRYN RASMUSSEN
Notarized Signature of Applicarig
State of Col rado ) ss
County of allwL
Thea f��rF oing instrument (Land Use Processi
by t 1� 1 " 5 Th
44;4—t,
Not1try Public
To be filled out by staff-
Date received 5/26/2otlo
Comp Plan Design.
Related Case No.
Assessor's Parcel No. �(
Size (acres or sqft) 7 l
Kc. 122/ 2016
NOTARY PUSUC
STATE OF COLORADO
NOTARY ID 2M5400@=
h1y COMMISS10M Ermr■sn seuetusv
was acknowledged by me this —day of , 20
My commission expires /2&/20 1 6
Fee s 7-0 O
Receipt No.
Pre -App Mtg. Date
Current Zoning
Proposed Zoning
Case No. WA -J(,1-07
Quarter Section Map
Case Manager U c c e r
Current Use
Proposed Use