The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWZ-15-02City of Wheat jjdge �CO!hAmuNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29`h Ave. December 23, 2015 Will Damrath Regency Centers 8480 E. Orchard Rd., Ste. 6900 Dear Mr. Damrath: Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 At its meeting of December 3, 2015, Planning Commission APPROVED the 32nd Avenue Variance of Case No. WA -15-09, a request for approval of a variance to the 0' to 20' build -to line in the Contemporary Overlay District adjacent to 32nd Avenue on property located at 12755 W. 32nd Avenue, for the following reasons: 1. The location of the drive-thru lane along the north side of the building will act as a buffer de- emphasizing the auto use. 2. The criteria used to evaluate a variance have been met. Planning Commission DENIED the Youngfield Street Variance of Case No. WA -15-09, a request for approval of a variance to the 0'to 20' build -to line in the Contemporary Overlay District adjacent to Youngfield Street on property located at 12755 W. 32nd Avenue for the following reasons: 1. Approval of the variance may endanger the public welfare by creating conflicting turning movements both on the site and off. 2. It could serve as precedence for future requests for variances to the build -to line along Youngfield and 32nd Avenue. 3. The evaluation criteria do not support the request. And, that the specific development plan be modified to reflect the drive aisle on the west side of the building as one-way south. Planning Commission APPROVED Case No. WZ-15-02, a request for approval of a Specific Development Plan for property zoned PCD located at 12755 W. 32nd Avenue, for the following reasons: 1. The proposal is consistent with the City's guiding documents including the Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy, Envision Wheat Ridge and the I-70/Kipling Urban Renewal Plan. 2. The proposed SDP is consistent with the approved ODP document. 3. All requirements for an SDP have been met. 4. The criteria used to evaluate an SDP have been met. With the following condition: 1. Staff will provide guidance for the applicant to redesign the portion of the development plan where the variance was denied. www-ci.wheatridge.co.us Please feel free to contact me at 303-235-2846 if you have any questions. Sincerely, .T— Tammy Odean Administrative Assistant Enclosure: Draft of Minutes cc: Wayne Sterling, Sterling Design WZ-15-02 & WA -15-09 (case file) WZ 1502.doc WA 1509.doc 1. PUBLIC HEARING A. Case Nos. WZ-15-02 & WA -15-09: Ms. Reckert gave a short presentation regarding the zone change, variance process and the application. She entered into the record the contents of the case file, packet materials, the zoning ordinance, and the contents of the digital presentation. She stated the public notice and posting requirements have been met; therefore the Planning Commission has jurisdiction to hear these cases. The applicant is requesting approval of a Specific Development Plan (SDP) for a Starbucks Cafe with a drive-thru, with variances to the build -to line for the property located at 3210 Youngfield Street & 12755 W. 32nd Avenue. Ms. Reckert explained that a variance can be considered concurrently with a zone change, but there needs to be a separate motion. The site for the Starbucks Cafe drive- thru is located in Applewood Village Shopping Center. It consists of two parcels and is currently vacant but use to be a fueling station and a retail strip building. In 2012 the City completed a Capital improvement project (CIP) to 32nd & Youngfield which included installation of new curbs and gutters and an 8 foot wide pedestrian path and pedestrian lights. All access into the property was eliminated with the 32"d/Youngfield street project. Ms. Reckert stated that recently another SDP was approved for a King Soopers Fueling Station also in the same shopping center. Along with the construction of the fueling station there will be a traffic signal installed on 32nd at the major interior drive adjacent to the fueling station. The site plan shows the layout of the site, including a 2500 sq. ft. cafe with an attached covered patio on the west side of the building. The main access point to the site will be via an internal drive from 32nd Avenue which is also the loading access to Applejack liquor store (Applejack alley). Once entering this access point there are three options: the first option is continuing north into the Chili's rear parking area, the second is to go to the drive-thru on the north side of the proposed building, and the third option is to park on the south side of the proposed building to go inside. The access point from 32nd Avenue will be a right-in/right-out. An additional access point will align with the drive-thru exit on Youngfield for out -bound right -turns only. The applicant is desirous of having the drive aisle on the western side of the building accommodate two —way traffic. Staff does not support this design for a variety of reasons; primarily due to potential conflicting traffic movements both on-site and on Youngfield. If the western drive is limited to one way south, this issue would be minimized. Included with the application are requests for variance to the 0' to 20' build -to requirement from adjacent streets. These requests are for the build -to lines on both 32nd Avenue and Youngfield Street. The variance on the 32nd side would result in a 65 foot setback. The variance on the Youngfield side is a 34 foot setback to allow for two-way traffic on the west side of the building proposed by the applicant. Other than the two setbacks not being met, all the other standards are compliant with the approved Outline Development Plan (ODP). If the variances are not approved than the SDP must be redesigned. Commissioner OHM asked how you would exit the site to go east on 321,d. Both Ms. Reckert and Mr. Westberg said that the best way to exit and go east on 32nd is to drive through the shopping center. Commissioner OHM opined about the variance criteria; he felt the outdoor canopy would be best situated on the east side of the building instead of the west. He also felt the two-way on Applejack Alley would not allow for enough stacking space and is not a good circulation plan. He also questioned why there was no sight triangle at 32nd turning north onto Youngfield. Ms. Reckert stated that because it is a signalized intersection, there is less of a concern for the sight triangle. Mr. Westberg added that a sight triangle is not needed because the lane being turned into to go north on Youngfield is a merge lane. Commissioner TIMMS had a question about the variance on the Youngfield side that staff does not support. He wondered what staff would propose if not a two-way drive aisle. Ms. Reckert stated that staff would support a one way aisle south. Commissioner TIMMS asked if the variance is denied, would the applicant adjust the building accordingly or would there be a complete reconfiguration. Ms. Reckert stated the applicant could better answer that question. Commissioner Kimsey had questions regarding pedestrian access. She clarified that the only pedestrian access is from 32"d Avenue and indicated that she also preferred the outdoor canopy on the east side of the building instead of the west. Ms. Reckert said that a majority of the pedestrians will probably come from 32nd as opposed to Youngfield, but some will also enter from the shopping center. Commissioner DORSEY gave his opinion regarding the two-way lane on the west side of the building. He feels it is complicated and likes the way the Starbucks at 38`h Ave. and Kipling St. is designed because the access is from an interior entrance inside the shopping center. Commissioner DORSEY indicated that he would like to see the subject building moved to the south side of the property with the drive-thru relocated to the south side of the building. He also questioned when the new traffic light would be installed. Mr. Westberg stated the new traffic signal will take about 3-4 months for design and purchase of the poles. The traffic signal will not affect the Starbucks project. It is anticipated that the signal will be complete by the time the fueling station receives a Certificate of Occupancy. Commissioner WEAVER shared the same concerns as the other commissioners regarding the two-way drive adjacent to Youngfield St.; she is also concerned about bike and pedestrian access. Ms. Reckert stated that this property is different than the one at 38th Ave. and Kipling as it is an infill lot. The developer has been conducting master planning exercises to look at internal access and how pedestrian and internal conflicts can be avoided. Commissioner BODEN asked about the variance on the 32nd Ave. side of the property. Ms. Reckert stated the proposed design would de -emphasis the drive-thru component and that there is a requirement for 10 stacking spaces. Commissioner BUCKNAM shared his concerns on the ODP referencing the ASDM and the 0'-20' build -to line. He would like to see the structure brought closer to the street. He also asked if there were any designs to eliminate the Youngfield exit allowing more one way circulation. Ms. Reckert stated that a multitude of different designs have been considered. Mr. Westberg added that Public Works is always concerned with traffic and there have been a lot of designs reviewed over the last year. The drive to and from Chili's is a late addition and will give another option for exiting or entering the site. Mr. Westberg also stated that once the vacant Wells Fargo to the east is demolished, than the ease of entering and exiting the site will be alleviated due to access to the new traffic light by the fueling station. Commissioner BUCKNAM asked why the sidewalk was not built as separated from the street anticipating there would be some sort of development on this site. Mr. Westberg stated at the time of the environmental assessment there was no emphasis on separated sidewalks. Commissioner BUCKNAM also asked that with regards to the sight line looking east on 32nd and the elevation change. Are there any concerns from a safety standpoint on quickly approaching traffic heading westbound on 32nd Mr. Westberg said that the elevation drops off where the new signal will be installed so there is no concern. Commissioner DORSEY asked about the right -out onto 32nd Ave. and questioned if cars will have sufficient room to get into the left lane to go west on I-70. Mr. Westberg stated yes, but it may not be prudent and a much better idea would be to go through the Chili's parking lot to one of the traffic lights. Will Damrath, Regency Centers 8480 E Orchard Road, Greenwood Village, CO Mr. Damrath is the owners' representative for the property where the site is located. The property is very important to the shopping center, albeit a complicated site to work with. It is very narrow which can complicate the develop ability. Another challenge is to maintain the existing delivery location for Applejack Liquor who is the largest tax generator in town. . Wayne Sterling, Sterling Design 7988 S. Bemis St. Littleton, CO Mr. Sterling stated that Sterling Design has been working with Starbucks on many different sites since 2006 and have been working on this site plan for over a year and a half. There have been numerous design scenarios considered and their client is comfortable with the most recent site plan with the exception of the variance for the two-way. Mr. Sterling continued to explain design features on the property including the 32" screen wall. He indicated that Starbucks is adamant about separating drive-thru customers from pedestrians. They are also required to have a 10 -car stacking lane. Regarding two-way circulation on the west, cars on the west side going north will have a stop sign so it doesn't seem to be a concern with the cars coming from the drive-thru. Mr. Damrath answered a question regarding master planning efforts for the southern portion of the shopping center which includes two additional developments. He indicated that while circulation issues may not be ideal today, but will be in the future. Discussion continued regarding parking and circulation on the site. Commissioner DORSEY asked if this new Starbucks will replace the Starbucks in the interior of the shopping center. Mr. Damrath stated that this is project is considered a relocation so the interior Starbucks will close. Commissioner BUCKNAM stated 32nd Ave. is one of the busiest bike routes from Golden to Denver and when discussing pedestrian connections what sort of bicycle connections are proposed? Mr. Sterling stated bicyclists can enter with the vehicular traffic or from the sidewalk connection and there will be bike racks available. Commissioner BUCKNAM still had concerns with regards to the two-way and wondered why the building can't be moved closer to 32nd Ave. as the Starbucks is on 38`h and Kipling. The dead-end and turnaround seem to work there. The applicants responded that the access is different at the two sites. Having the two- way on the west side of the building will give another option to exit and hopefully ease congestion at the alley. Mr. Damrath also stated that future plans with adjacent sites will open up and help circulation. Mike Haaf, Landscape Architect with Sterling Design 2009 W. Littleton Blvd., #300, Littleton, CO Mr. Haaf stated that the access points and this site plan helps with the traffic circulation on the southern portion of the shopping center. Ms. Reckert reminded Planning Commission that they are the approving authority in this situation and the applicant can appeal to City Council if the variances are not passed. Commissioner OHM asked if one variance does not pass, whether the SDP passes. Ms. Reckert stated that Planning Commission can ask the applicant to redesign and come back. The applicant can also work with staff to modify the design without the variances or the applicant can appeal to City Council. Commissioner OHM reiterated he is not in favor of the variance and has concerns over the circulation and the placement of the patio. He states a good option would be to move the building so the architecture can be seen and the circulation would be safer for traffic to move into the shopping center or on to 32"d Avenue. Commissioner Weaver asked what happens if the variance for the west side of Youngfield is denied. Commissioner BUCKNAM explained that the applicant would then have to build the building closer to the property line and there would be no two-way access on the western side. It was moved by Commissioner TIMMS and seconded by Commissioner WEAVER to APPROVE the 32nd Avenue Variance, a request for approval of a variance to the 0' to 20' build -to line in the Contemporary Overlay District adjacent to 32"d Avenue on property located at 12755 W. 32"d Avenue, for the following reasons: 1. The location of the drive-thru lane along the north side of the building will act as a buffer de-emphasizing the auto use. 2. The criteria used to evaluate a variance have been met. The motion was carried 7-0 It was moved by Commissioner OHM and seconded by Commissioner WEAVER to DENY the Youngfield Street Variance, a request for approval of a variance to the 01to 20' build -to line in the Contemporary Overlay District adjacent to Youngfield Street on property located at 12755 W. 32"d Avenue for the following reasons: 1. Approval of the variance may endanger the public welfare by creating conflicting turning movements both on the site and off. 2. It could serve as precedence for future requests for variances to the build -to line along Youngfield and 32"d Avenue. 3. The evaluation criteria do not support the request. And, that the specific development plan be modified to reflect the drive aisle on the west side of the building as one-way south. Motion carried 7-0. It was moved by Commissioner WEAVER and seconded by Commissioner BODEN to recommend APPROVAL of Case No. W Z-15-02, a request for approval of a Specific Development Plan for property zoned PCD located at 12755 W. 32nd Avenue, for the following reasons: 1. The proposal is consistent with the City's guiding documents including the Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy, Envision Wheat Ridge and the I- 70/Kipling Urban Renewal Plan. 2. The proposed SDP is consistent with the approved ODP document. 3. All requirements for an SDP have been met. 4. The criteria used to evaluate an SDP have been met. With the following condition: 1. Staff will provide guidance for the applicant to redesign the portion of the development plan where the variance was denied. Motion carried 7-0. PUBLIC HEARING ROSTER CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION December 3, 2015 Case Nos. WZ-15-02 & WA -15-09: an application filed by Regency Centers L.P. for approval of a Specific Development Plan for a Starbucks Cafe with a drive-thru, with variances to the build -to line for property located at 3210 Youngfield Street & 12755 W. 32nd Avenue. (Please print) Name Address In Favor/Opposed r /�" T 7Gc--To-✓ �f.2- f- W City i e COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEof NT CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission CASE MANAGER: Meredith Reckert DATE OF MEETING: December 3, 2015 CASE NO. & NAME: WZ-15-02 & WA-15-09/Starbucks ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a Planned Commercial Development (PCD) Specific Development Plan (SDP) with variances LOCATION OF REQUEST: Southwest corner of Applewood Village Shopping Center addressed as 12755 W. 32"d Avenue PROPERTY OWNER: Regency Centers APPROXIMATE AREA: .8 acres PRESENT ZONING: Planned Commercial Development (PCD) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Primary Commercial Corridor, Community Commercial Center, Mixed -Use Commercial ENTER INTO RECORD: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS ZONING ORDINANCE DIGITAL PRESENTATION ttevieW — c � _ -Wast 32nd Avenue WZ-15-02 & WA-15-09/Starbucks All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. I. REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a Planned Commercial Development (PCD) Specific Development Plan (SDP) with variances from the 0 to 20 -foot build -to line on property located 12755 W. 32"d Avenue for construction of a Starbucks Cafe. (Exhibit 1, Applicant letter) The City's planned development approval is a two-step process. The first step is for the zone change to PCD and approval of an Outline Development (ODP). The ODP document sets allowed uses and development standards for the property. The ODP also contains a general concept plan which labels areas of landscaping, parking, building footprints, access points and areas for new development. The ODP approval requires a public hearing in front of both Planning Commission and City Council, and an ODP has already been approved for the subject property. The Specific Development Plan (SDP) is the second step of the process which focuses on the details of the development such as final drainage, street improvements, architecture and final lot layout. New SDP approvals require review by Planning Commission. A City Council public hearing is not required unless the application is denied by Planning Commission or the applicant objects to conditions placed on the approval. A neighborhood meeting is not required for a Specific Development Plan. II. EXISTING CONDITIONS/PROPERTY HISTORY The Applewood Village Shopping Center is comprised of approximately 35 acres in the western quadrant of the City of Wheat Ridge, adjacent to the I-70 corridor. The shopping center is bordered by West 38`h Avenue to the north, low density residential neighborhoods to the north and east, West 32nd to the south, and Youngfield Street to the west. (Exhibit 2, Aerial Photo) The Applewood Village Shopping Center is the City's largest commercial center. It serves area residents as well as drawing customers and patrons from the region, via its access to I-70. The Applewood Shopping center was rezoned from Neighborhood Commercial, Restricted Commercial and Commercial -One to Planned Commercial Development pursuant to Case No. WZ-14-09. The intent of that application was to incorporate new ownership parcels, consolidate the boundary of the center and to prepare several existing building pads for new development. Most of the redevelopment opportunities are on the southern one-third of the shopping center. The shopping center is located in a busy commercial corridor and has easy access to 1-70 through the 32nd Avenue and Youngfield on/off ramps. Youngfield and both West 32nd and 38th Avenues are classified as minor arterials and carry numerous vehicles per day. The location is also a popular stop for travelers to and from the mountains who can fulfill most of their shopping WZ-15-02 & WA-15-09/Starbucks needs in a single stop. A major interior drive aisle connects 32"d and 38`h Avenues. Neither of these major access points is currently signalized; however a signal will be installed at the 32nd Avenue access prior to completion of the new King Soopers fueling center. III. OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN Attached is a copy of the approved Outline Development Plan for the shopping center which contains two sheets. (Exhibit 3, ODP document) Allowable Uses: Uses permitted under the ODP are C-1 uses which allow office, service and retail uses, including large format retail stores. The approved list of uses was expanded in 2014 to allow drive- through facilities on the site as a use by right. Development Standards: The ODP typically defines development parameters on the front sheet of the document. In determining setbacks, a notation on Sheet 1 directs the reader to the Architectural and Site Design Manual (ASDM). The property is located within the Contemporary Overlay district in the (ASDM) which establishes a build -to requirement, essentially requiring all new structures with public street frontage to be located within 20 feet of the property line. All other setbacks defer back to the C-1 zone district regulations. Lot Coverage: Lot coverage in the shopping center is limited to a maximum of 35% building coverage (526,803 square feet), 55% hard surfaced coverage and a minimum 10% landscaped coverage. In addition to the landscape coverage minimum, the ODP specifies that for individual lots, plant quantities and materials be consistent with Section 26-502 (Landscape Regulations). Parking: Parking on the site is required at a rate of 4 spaces per 1000 square feet of gross building coverage which is consistent with the requirements in the zoning code for unified shopping centers over 100,000 square feet in size. Language was included under Note 7 to allow blanket access, parking and circulation throughout the shopping center. Building Height: Maximum building height allowed is 50' which is consistent with most commercial zone district classifications in the City. Architecture: References have been made to the ASDM for fagade design, transparency, architectural materials and screening. Architectural materials used for recent upgrades in the center include brick, stucco and rock. Access: WZ-15-02 & WA-15-09/Starbucks Primary access into the shopping center comes from 32"d and 38`" Avenue and from a signalized access point from Youngfield at roughly mid -point in the shopping center. There are also minor access points for individual parcels along both 32nd and Youngfield. The ODP includes language allowing external access points to be reviewed and potentially consolidated with any future redevelopment. Internal access points may also be evaluated and potentially redesigned with redevelopment. A previously approved SDP for the King Soopers fueling site to the east requires installation of a signal at the primary 32nd Avenue access point prior to C.O. III. SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN The proposed SDP area for the new Starbucks is at the very southwest corner of the shopping center. It includes two parcels which formerly contained a gas station and strip retail building. The sites are currently vacant. (Exhibit 4, redevelopment area) The properties were previously owned by Longs Peak Metropolitan District and were acquired as part of the acquisition for right-of-way for improvements to the 32"d/Youngfield intersection. Right-of-way acquisitions for the street project included 10' from the Youngfield frontage and 30' from 32nd The intent of the acquisitions and improvements is to accommodate a future regional commercial node to the northwest known as Clear Creek Crossing (CCC). The development of CCC has not occurred but the associated 32"d Avenue and Youngfield street improvements were completed by the City in 2012. Improvements adjacent to the site included installation of new curb and gutter and an 8' wide pedestrian path and pedestrian lights. All accesses into the property were eliminated with the 32"d/Youngfield street project. Regency acquired the properties in 2013. The structures were demolished in 2014. Land uses directly abutting the development site are, to the north, parcels zoned Planned Commercial Development (PCD) which include a Chili's Restaurant, Wells Fargo Bank drive- through, and Mucilli's Shoes and Repair. Parcels to the northeast and east are the Applejack Liquor store and the old Wells Fargo bank building, respectively. A drive access from 32nd Avenue used by Applejack for loading purposes separates the subject site from the vacant bank building (Applejack alley). The bank building does not have access to this drive. The parcels to the south across 32nd Avenue are zoned PCD, and are used as a Walgreen's pharmacy and First Bank. To the west is the 1-70 corridor. (Exhibit 5, site photos) WZ-15-02 & WA-15-09/Starbucks Attached is a copy of the Specific Development Plan (SDP) which contains eleven sheets, each of which is also described below. (Exhibit 6, SDP document) Sheet 1 is the declaration page of the document which includes legal descriptions, signature blocks, site data table, etc. Sheet 2 of the document shows the proposed layout of the new development. Site improvements include construction of a 2500 square foot cafe with an attached covered patio on the western side of the building. Access to the site is via the interior drive from 32nd Avenue to the east which also provides loading access to the Applejack liquor store (Applejack alley). This access point to 32"d will be limited to a right in/right out only but will have a mountable turn prohibitor at 32nd Avenue which will still accommodate liquor store deliveries. Once entering the site from the Applejack alley, the driver can either proceed to the drive- through on the north side of the building or park in the parking area to the south of the building along West 32nd Avenue. A pedestrian crossing is provided in this area to accommodate bus patrons and pedestrians. Further to the north but still on the site, internal access is provided from the same alley which will connect with the existing property to the north (Chili's rear parking area). An additional access point aligning with the drive-through exit is provided to Youngfield for out- bound right -turns only. The building is placed in the northwest corner of the site. The property is located within the Contemporary overlay district in the ASDM which requires buildings to have a 0' to 20' build -to adjacent to public street sides. Neither the southern nor the western building setbacks are compliant with this requirement. As such, the applicant has requested variances from the build -to requirement from both 32nd Avenue (Request A) and Youngfield (Request B). Numerous discussions and design options were explored with the applicant. Concessions were made on the part of the City including allowing the patio adjacent to Youngfield to count as the build -to (instead of the building itself). The City has also contributed to the developability of the site by the construction of public improvements on both the 32nd and Youngfield frontages. As proposed by the applicant, the drive area adjacent to Youngfield allows two-way traffic. This would allow vehicles exiting the drive-through to either go right onto Youngfield (north) or turn left to go south via this western drive. Because it is proposed as two-way, the access on the western side of the structure will also accommodate vehicles from the southern parking lot to go north. Alternatively these drivers would exit onto 32nd Avenue and immediately enter the right turn land headed for northbound Youngfield. This northbound movement has the potential for creating conflicts on-site with vehicles exiting the drive-through. The two-way access drive also shifts the structure further to the east violating the build -to requirement adjacent to Youngfield. WZ-15-02 & WA-15-09/Starbucks III t Staff also has concerns for potential traffic conflicts on the adjacent public streets. If additional "d traffic is allowed to exit going north on Youngfield, vehicles in the turn lane westbound on 32 Avenue onto north bound Youngfield will have to avoid these vehicles exiting the site to go north. The proposed turning design increases the frequency of merge/diverge conflicts on Youngfield in proximity to two major intersections and a highway interchange. If the western drive is limited to one way south, this issue would be minimized. I , ` L Merge/Diverge Coeflk*s SITE LIGHT (T`TP.) I , RAS ANDSCAPE( LA RIGHT -OUT ONLY j� TRAJNK YOU / ( SEP1EJQ EX s0 ' PAVEMENT 1 `.. EXIST CONCRETE/ AALT P'_.ENT EXI NCRETE P EM1tENT I� EXIT ONLY STOP SIGN v Yy1 RIGHT. ' RN S 1_ - T) 12 30 a � - 24.0' - u � •i o- I L: I m 1 10' TELEPHONE. ANY 7929 E 289.91 J - - LS 4 -WJ Area of potential conflictICRETE o �_ 12 a - - Y -11- PETE L, Ib ASPHALT A\\ LS 12] b a6 3' - ! - Hi- ---E5 tvCH-S5 57 SCREEN WPL. - .T 4.0' 27.8 , - LS 15 102 - 9(Y 2.0 ROW EXIST. B' CONC SIDF'JALK - `r OEMC-Ar-ON CARATE - - - - - - - - - - - W. 32ND AVENUE Sheet 2 also shows future right-of-way dedications for both Youngfield and 32"d Avenue with gray shading behind the existing back -of -walk. Two feet will be dedicated for 32"d, with 6'dedicated for Youngfield at the time of overall shopping center platting. Sheets 3 and 4 are the landscape plans for the site. A total of 10% landscaped coverage is required where 23% live landscaping is provided. An additional 9% of hardscape is provided via internal sidewalks and uncovered patio areas. A 32" high screen wall is provided along the WZ-15-02 & WA-15-09/Starbucks corner radius and the 32"d Avenue frontage. All quantities for street trees and additional trees and shrubs have been met or exceeded. Sheets 5 is a photometric plan which is generally is consistent with the City's standards for footcandle readings and pole height. Sheets 6, 7 and 8 provide details for on-site directional signage and menu boards. Sheets 9 and 10 show fagade elevations for the facility. Four-sided architecture is provided with a combination of brick, stucco and stone used on the exterior of the building. Fagade transparency is shown as 33% and 40% respectively on the south and west facades. Staff concludes that the proposed building architecture is consistent with the standards in the ASDM. Sheet 11 provides a colored perspective of the building. IV. VARIANCE CRITERIA Included with this application are requests for variances to the 0' - 20' build -to line required in the Contemporary Overlay district in the ASDM from Youngfield and West 32nd Avenue. The purpose of the variance request on Youngfield is to allow two-way traffic on the western side of the building. The proposed setback is shown as 34' between the Youngfield right -of way line and the columns supporting the patio cover. The 32"d Avenue request, which results in a 65' setback, is to accommodate the drive -lane on the north side of the building, making it less visible. If the variances are not approved, the SDP must be redesigned to comply with the build -to requirements. In order to approve the setback variances, Planning Commission must find that the majority of the criteria for review of variances listed in Section 26-115.C.4 of the City Code have been met. Staff provides the following review and analysis of the variance criteria. (Exhibit 7, Applicant's response to variance criteria) 1. The property in question would not yield a reasonable return in use, service, or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located. The property would yield a reasonable return in use, service and income without the variance approvals. The Starbucks could be built with only one-way access on the western side with no substantial impact to customers or employees. Drivers would simply exit directly into the northbound right turn lane on 32"d. There could be a positive impact on patrons using the outside patio as traffic passing by would be less than if it were two-way. WZ-15-02 & WA-15-09/Starbucks The variance on 32nd Avenue allows the drive through to be located on the north side of the building tucked between the Starbucks and Chili's. Staff finds that this criterion has been met for the 32"d Avenue variance, but not the Youngfield variance. 2. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. While the Youngfield variance may not significantly alter the character of the area, it will be inconsistent with the City's new paradigm for encouraging pedestrian friendly development and a higher quality of architecture and urban design being presented at the street. Other redeveloping properties in the shopping center will be required to meet the build -to line. Approval of this variance may encourage additional future development which is non-compliant with the build -to requirement. This is less of a concern along the 32nd Avenue frontage. Staff finds that this criterion has been met for the 32"d Avenue variance, but not the Youngfield variance. 3. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property with this application, which would not be possible without the variance. The City would like to see this property redeveloped as it is currently an eyesore and is underutilized. This project represents a substantial investment in the shopping center however; it could be developed without the variances. Staff finds this criterion has not been met. 4. The particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved results in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out. There is no particular shape or topographical reason why the variance should be approved. Staff finds this criterion has not been met. 5. The alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. The hardship has been created by the applicant with the desire to have two-way traffic on the west side of the structure. Staff is supportive of locating the drive-through lane along the north side of the building, which will act as a buffer de-emphasizing the auto use. WZ-15-02 & WA-15-09/Starbucks Staff finds that this criterion has been net for the 32"d Avenue variance, but not the Youngfield variance. 6. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located, by, among other things, substantially or permanently impairing the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, ,impairing the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or substantially diminishing or impairing property values within the neighborhood. Approval of the variance request on Youngfield could be detrimental to the public welfare by increasing the risk of conflicting turning movements for vehicles exiting the drive-through and cars traveling north on the west side of the building to exit onto Youngfield. Off-site traffic could also be impacted because of the merge/diverge movements on Youngfield. The two-way on the west side of the structure may impact the amount of light and air to patrons using the restaurant patio impairing the use of this design feature. Staff finds that this criterion has not been met. 7. The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are present in the neighborhood and are not unique to the property. There are no unique conditions which merit a variance to the build -to on Youngfield Street. Approval of this variance could be used as justification for additional variances along the Youngfield frontage as other properties redevelop, which is in direct conflict to the urban design and pedestrian goals of the City. The 32"d Avenue variance is unique as it shifts the drive-through aware from public street view. Staff finds that this criterion has been met for the 32nd Avenue variance, but not the Youngfield variance. 8. Granting of the variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities. Approval of the subject variance would not directly result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities; although the redevelopment will be in compliance with all federal, state and local regulations relating to accessibility. Staff finds that this criterion has not been met. WZ-15-02 & WA-15-09/Starbucks 9. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual Staff has reviewed the site plan and building elevations and has concluded that the proposal will generally be consistent with the ASDM with the exception of the variance to the build -to line on Youngfield. This includes meeting the goals for internal connections with adjacent properties, pedestrian connections, increased buffering, and enhanced architectural materials. Staff finds that this criterion has been met for the 32"d Avenue variance, but not the Youngfield variance. V. SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN CRITERIA Criteria for the review of SDP documents is provided in Section 26-305.D. Staff has provided an analysis of these criteria below. Planning Commission shall base its decision in consideration of the extent to which the criteria have been met. 1. The proposed specific development plan is consistent with the purpose of a planned development as stated in section 26-301 of zoning and development code. The intent of a planned development is to permit well-designed, innovative developments which may not be feasible under a standard zone district and to promote flexible and efficient use of land. Other general purposes of a planned development are: • To promote the efficient use of land to facilitate a more economic arrangement of building, circulation systems, land use and utilities. • To promote compatible development with adjacent commercial, residential and/or industrial land uses through proper land use transitions and buffering techniques. • To promote conformance with the adopted comprehensive plan, established policies and guidelines for the area and for the community. Staff has concluded that the SDP is consistent with these goals by providing logical and compatible commercial development with internal connections and consolidated access points. Staff concludes that this criteria has been met. 2. The proposed specific development plan is consistent with the design intent or purpose of the approved outline development plan. WZ-15-02 & WA-15-09/Starbucks The intent of the Outline Development Plan was to provide a document whereby existing buildings could be accommodated and new redevelopment opportunities could be incorporated into the shopping center. Care was taken to ensure there would be consistency with architectural themes and design elements throughout the shopping center, including the requirement of consolidated access points and upgraded architecture and landscaping. The proposed SDP is consistent with the approved ODP in teens of land use and design. Staff concludes that this criteria has been met. 3. The proposed uses indicated in the specific development plan are consistent with the uses approved by the outline development plan. A drive-through restaurant is designated as a permitted land use on the ODP. Staff concludes that this criterion has been met. 4. The site is appropriately designed and is consistent with the development guidelines established in the outline development plan. The design of the site has taken into consideration safe, consolidated access and an upgraded landscape design which will be compliant with the development guidelines on the ODP and in the Architectural and Site Design Manual (ASDM). The following is a comparison of standards establishes on the ODP and those provided on the SDP. Development standard Approved on ODP Starbucks - Provided on SDP Building height 50' 25' Building coverage 35% 9% (withpatio) Min. landscape coverage 10% 23% (live) Setbacks Front (32nd Avenue): 0' -- 20' 65' Side adjacent to a 0' — 20' 34' public street (Youngfield): Rear (north): 10' 24' Side (east): 5' 165' Parking Per section 26-501 Complies Uses allowed C-1 uses including Complies drive-through and drive -up facilities Staff concludes that this criterion has been met. WZ-15-02 & WA-15-09/Starbucks 5. Adequate infrastructure/facilities are available to serve the subject property, or the applicant will upgrade and provide such where they do not exist or are under capacity; All utility agencies were previously serving the property and based on referral responses received, will be able to do so with the proposed redevelopment. There will be no impact on parks, schools or other public facilities or services. Staff concludes that this criterion has been met. 6. The proposed specific development plan is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual, Streetscape Design Manual, and other applicable design standards. Staff has reviewed the site design and has concluded that the proposal will generally be consistent with the ASDM. The two exceptions are the variances from the build -to line, one of which Staff does not believe meets the criteria for variance approval (Youngfield side). The redevelopment will be compatible with and complimentary to adjacent commercial uses and to the shopping center as a whole with similar architectural elements and materials. Staff concludes that this criterion has not been met. VI. TRAFFIC AND DRAINAGE Commercial development in the Youngfield/I-70 corridor continues to intensify with new development of and reinvestment in tired, outdated structures and sites. West 32nd Avenue accommodates roughly 12,000 vehicle trips per day. It is also heavily used by regional bicycle traffic as it is one of the only arterials that run from downtown west to Golden. Joint use of the access into the site from 32nd Avenue and the Applejack alley will accommodate both patron traffic and deliveries for the liquor store. Furthermore, installation of the proposed signal at the major access from the shopping center at 32"d Avenue will facilitate easier access into and from the shopping center. The city is requiring that the traffic signal be installed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the fueling station. A master drainage report for the southern section of the shopping center was reviewed. In general, storm water is collected in an inlet in the southern parking area and is conveyed via storm sewer to the new detention pond to the east of King Soopers fueling station. The detention pond will provide water quality at today's standards before releasing at the accepted rates set by the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District. The storm flows will be discharged into a proposed storm sewer within Wright Court and flow to the existing storm WZ-15-02 & WA-15-09/Starbucks sewer main within West 32"d Avenue, and eventually to Lena Gulch. The storm water improvements must be constructed and certified prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the fueling station and Starbucks cafe. As the property is comprised of two parcels, prior to issuance of a building permit a consolidation plat must be approved to accommodate the new redevelopment site. VII. AGENCY REFERRALS All affected service agencies were contacted regarding their ability to serve the property. The developer will be responsible for any needed upgrades to accommodate the proposed development. Specific referral responses follow. Consolidated Mutual Water District: Can serve with improvements installed at the developer's expense. Upgrades of existing infrastructure may be needed in the interior of the shopping center. CDOT: No concerns. All improvements are in place. Wheat Ridge Fire Protection District: No concerns about servicing the property. They will assess the need for water supply, hydrant locations, site access and building configuration prior to building permit. Renewal Wheat Ridge: Renewal Wheat Ridge has reviewed the application and has determined that it does not conflict with the I-70/Kipling Corridors Urban Renewal Plan. Wheat Ridge Police: Can serve. Wheat Ridge Public Works: PW has reviewed a master drainage report for the southern portion of the shopping center. They have also reviewed a traffic impact analysis for the southern portion of the shopping center. A plat will be required to remove internal lot lines prior to building permit issuance. Northwest Lakewood Sanitation District: Has adequate capacity to accommodate development. Xcel Energy: Can serve. VIII. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION Staff has concluded that the proposed Specific Development Plan is consistent with the planned development regulations, with the goals and policies of the City's guiding documents, and with the Applewood Village Shopping Center ODP. Because the requirements for an SDP have been met and the review criteria support the SDP, a recommendation for approval is given with conditions listed below. However, Staff is recommending approval of the variance from 32nd WY -15-02 & WA-15-09/Starbucks Avenue but denial of the variance adjacent to Youngfield and that site plan be modified to show one-way traffic on the western drive aisle. IX. SUGGESTED MOTIONS: VARIANCES 32"d Avenue Variance Option A: "I move to APPROVE Variance A, a request for approval of a variance to the 0' to 20' build -to line in the Contemporary Overlay District adjacent to 32nd Avenue on property located at 12755 W. 32nd Avenue, for the following reasons: 1. The location of the drive-through lane along the north side of the building will act as a buffer de-emphasizing the auto use. 2. The criteria used to evaluate a variance have been met. " Option B: "I move to DENY Variance A, a request for approval of a variance to the 0' to 20' build -to line in the Contemporary Overlay District adjacent to 32nd Avenue on property located at 12755 W. 32nd Avenue, for the following reasons: 1. 2." Youngfield Street Variance Option A: "I move to APPROVE Variance B, a request for approval of a variance to the 0' to 20' build -to line in the Contemporary Overlay District adjacent to Youngfield Street on property located at 12755 W. 32nd Avenue, for the following reasons: 1. 2." Option B: "I move to DENY Variance B, a request for approval of a variance to the 0' to 20' build -to line in the Contemporary Overlay District adjacent to Youngfield Street on property located at 12755 W. 32nd Avenue, for the following reasons: 1. Approval of the variance may endanger the public welfare by creating conflicting turning movements both on the site and off. 2. It could serve as precedence for future requests for variance to the build -to line along Youngfield and 32nd Avenue. 3. The evaluation criteria do not support the request. And, that the plan be modified to reflect the drive aisle as one-way south." SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN WZ-15-02 & WA-15-09/Starbucks Option A: 1 move to APPROVE Case No. WZ-15-02, a request for approval of a Specific Development Plan for property zoned PCD located at 12755 W. 32"d Avenue, for the following reasons: I . The proposal is consistent with the City's guiding documents including the Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy, Envision Wheat Ridge and the I-70/Kipling Urban Renewal Plan. 1. The proposed SDP is consistent with the approved ODP document. 2. All requirements for an SDP have been met. 3. The criteria used to evaluate an SDP have been met." Option A: I move to DENY Case No. WZ-15-02, a request for approval of a Specific Development Plan for property zoned PCD located at 12755 W. 32nd Avenue, for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3." WZ-15-02 & WA-15-09/Starbucks EXHIBIT I - APPLICANT LETTER ra �lY _ 1S —f �c Sterling Deign Associates, Inc Written Request and Description Date: 03.27.15 To: Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner Cxy of Wheat Ridge Community Drrclopment Department 7500 W. 29th Ave 1r -d Floor W1 n:at RidM CO 00033 Fr tarn Owen K cera n. PE RE, SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PI AN Starbucks at W 32— Avenue A Youngfield Str"t 3210 Young"Id Street, Wheat Ridge, CO 80013 Sterling Design Associates has wired a Specific Develuprnent Plan (SDP) submittal cn behalf of Regency Centers, L.P. for the development of a Starbucks cafe with drive-tMu. It is dee Intent al Regency Centers, LP, to redevelop a PDrtcn of the southwest corner of the Applewood Wlage Shopping Center into a 2,500 square !pot Srarbucks aic wath a drive-thru and asscxutecf parkriE Thr Crarh,r4c cirq q.n it t9rnpri-d of two Cxr�tin$ prarcch conDlnitig approximately 0 8 acre The proposed Starbucks site lies within a Planned Commercial Development (PCD) roving as defined n the Applewood Village Shopping Center Amendment >:9 Outline Development Plan (ODPI The Applevenod Village Shopping Center is also located to the Contrmparar-y Overlay Area as defined to the Wheat Ridge Arch tecwnl .and Site Desvri Manual. The proposed Starbucks cafe has adequate amessrbilicy and utility services to the site. Access to the site will be from an improved txltranee to the Appk4u* Wine & Spirits servtcaideitvery alley as well as a rght-in only access off of W, 32'+ Avenue approved W a Special use Permit, which includes approval of a right -out only egress onto Youngfield Street The proposed Starbucks cafe will provide indoor and outdoor patio seating as well as a dare-thrv, The building has been posooDned in order to balance vehicular cirtiubti m while maintaining the required "build to` distance off of Youngfield Street The site will provide ample off-street parkuvg and drive-thru Sucking of up to eleven cars before on-site circulation is affected. Proposed s devvalk on-site as well as a connection to the W. 32.1 Avenue sidewalk , near lire exisarng RTD bus stop, will prornute a pedesrrwr friendly entrance to the Starbucks cafe A consolidation re -plat of the two existing parcels will be prepared and recorded prior to the issuance of a building perrrat The re -plat will be subn*utd as a separate document not included with this SDP subnnmiml. Jar M. Newell, PE Warne T. Sterling, RLA, LEED AP Juu% w, Lcoemn Bhd alit t-roetort CO to IA 101 79{ 4727 0 w.....Sec't •li�nc�rea. co». c Sterling Design Associates, Iic The proposed Starbucks SDP is consisterx with rho r>ni-r,:l ri ,rte— rF.h. ah.f,......e vanagy Shopping Corte* OOP. "cow are responses to the SDP review criteria as stated in Section 2& 345.0 of the Municipal Code. I . The proposed specific developrnrrht plan Is consistent with the purpose of a planned development as stated .n section 26.301 of this article Response' The prols6144 Stalbutkd site is located within a PCD in the Applewood Village ShoFong Center. The esrl"-S cheWinj ;9mr s2ritans a sfrrrilirsc group of mixed retail uses and the Starbucks caft is consistent with other businesses within the 2. The proposed specific development plan is conststent with the design intent or purpose rsf rhw orrrr—tui rniri,nn rte &lnrman+ rl— Response: The Applewood Village Shopping Center ODP states ongning and fuwre development of the shopping center will be consistent with the land uses established in LI- rcD, The W u&Aywu 9ui wu0.s s.ilC is n.tlrrs'stent Mtn =61' land uses within the 'l—. nfvrv.nr 3. The proposed uses indicated in the specific devesopnKpt plan are consistent wrth uses approved by the outline development plan. Kesponse: I he Applewood Village Stropping Grow as characterised in the ODP by all formats of retell use. The proposed Starbucks cafe is consistent with other retail facilities -within shs drrelepnxvit. 4. The site is appropriatialy designed and is consistent with the developrnefht gutdelioni s esuNished in the outime development plan. Response: The new development guldeflnes as oudir d in the Applewood Vttage- Shapp"ng Centy Ameihdment 09 ODP is consistent with the proposed Sarbucks cafe as decg w d. The bu.MtnS des:sr+ utiGeea • vsi+ec + of mauei irlm .nludiiig swne, trick gtass, stucco and structural steel canoopies. The irsduslon of lobi screen walls and refuse enclosure screen which snatch primary building materials are consistent with the Applewood Shopping Center Devellopment Qadeflw 5 Adepuaorc infrastrAxLureftoldies ire avaiht& rn N+vn rhe subwtt prop". or the applicant will upgrade and provide such where they do not exist or are under capacity, Response: AiSequatlr water and sewer servoce is available for the proposed Star bucks (Afit. Water and sewer trains whit be tonnececd wirhin thi R#L•ol.Way in W. 32A Averiue. Swan drainage t'nprovtrnentl. mtluding a denenuon pond and swarm sewer are proposed as plot of the King coopers Fuelling center located near the southeast corner of the site. This detention pond was des toned to rrrovulp rlrt~ir .-1, proposed Surburks cafe In addition to the detention {fond, storm sewer will be constructed up to the propmpid Starluir4e r in Cit* whirl+ wo convey on sate storm sewer flows tQ the proposed pand. Jay M. Newell, PE Wayne T. Scerlint, RLA, LEER AP 2woo W. tim.cm and ir)oo uirl.mn cO Sol 30 10).294 4M ph .mow StMnt:lrftN4a��rtocnrr Sterling Design Associates. IIc 6. The proposed specik development plan Is in substantial comPhanep wah thp zpplu?'taT standards srt forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual, StreetVApe Design f 1alJual risj utile Aloluuk! U1mIll stsmasism. Dtr"nsir The aiae Wotan ■f the propoicd Suu Lout s tete {Aunties all etp K111t. IUW_ rrnpact drwnlnpment [hat int� tes with swroundliina businesses, The Dr000sed sidewalk configuraunn pr Prnims a vn WAt4c srnirlanment with corint` ton poin[a Eo yyy. 32ro Avenue and the service alloy ro rhe P*.Lt rJ ri,.. ire A..;I r;.,0 rr""""T^S R`4t1 Ysaa riaikililr from, Elie intersection at Younafreld Street and W. 32- Avarua- Thr P uir6ns aka pre+id" screerang the drive-thru lane from off-site traffic. Landscaped areas,'Atl utilise cdoAul and tmural low watrr demand plantings, heeded gr ass. gra! a Wtlrid tsf dalduauc and evEiycpl Irm. We look forward to your feedback and working with you in an attempt to develop an "i-OPualrl prnlem tar Snrbutyts 3md d►t City of What Kldge. Mease fed free to contacE myself should &rare be any questions of if additional rnfornutron is needed. Owen Keenan, PE OW EWeer Gwrlir� !'1wc.�, Oc<rv.,ro< )ar M. Newell, pf Wayne 1. tkeriln& RLI, LEIB AP trWeML CO OD12D !DJ >Ra,4i27 pr EXHIBIT 2 -AERIAL APPLEWOOD VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER -AMENDMENT#9 OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN LAND LOCATED IN THE EAST 1/2 OF THE N.W. 1/4 OF SECTION 29, PURPOSE FOR AMENDMENT TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, THIS AMENDMENT IS FOR: IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. 1. EXPANDING THE BOUNDARY OF THE PLAN SO AS TO REZONE AND INCLUDE ADDITIONAL PARCELS PREVIOUSLY ZONED NIC. RL AND C-1 AS SHOWN IN THE KEY MAP BELOW LEGAL DESCRIPTION 2. PROVIDING GENERAL GUIDELINES AND PARAMETERS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT AND RE -DEVELOPMENT IN THE SHOPPING CENTER. ZONED NL ZONED R{ f ( i ZONED PCO J � r� r� Ow'ZONE.- YOUNGFIFLOST KEY MAP CHARACTER OF THE DEVELOPMENT THE EXISTING REGIONAL MIXED USE COMMERCIAL RETAIL SHOPPING CENTER IS CHARACTERIZED BY ALL FORMATS OF RETAIL USE. THE SITE IS ADJACENT TO THE INTERSTATE AND ACCOMMODATES CONVENIENT CAR ACCESS. PARKING IN FRONT OF BUILDINGS AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION THROUGHOUT THE CENTER. THE EXISTING MIXED USE COMMERCIAL RETAIL SHOPPING CENTER BECAME A PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT (PCD) IN 1975. IN 2007 THE SHOPPING CENTER WAS INCLUDED IN THE CONTEMPORARY OVERLAY AREA AS DEFINED IN THE WHEAT RIDGE ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE DESIGN MANUAL ASDM) DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINE ONGOING USE AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SHOPPING CENTER WILL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE LAND USES ESTABLISHED IN THE PCD INCLUDING SITE DESIGN BASED ON THE ALLOWED BUILDING AREAS, PAVING AREAS, LANDSCAPE AREAS AND PARKING. THE ASDM IS TO BE USED AS A GUIDELINE FOR BUILDING DESIGN AS FOLLOWS. NEW BUILDING DESIGN IS TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE APPLEWOOD SHOPPING CENTER PCD. CHAPTER 4, SECTION 4 1 COMMERCIAL RETAIL AND MIXED USE IN THE ASDM IS TO BE USED AS A GUIDELINE FOR BUILDING PLACEMENT, FACADE DESIGN, MATERIALS, TRANSPARENCY AND SCREENING EXISTING BUILDING DESIGN MAJOR ADDITIONS: (50% OR MORE INCREASE IN THE EXISTING BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE) TO BECONSISTENT WITH THE APPLEWOOD SHOPPING CENTER PCD. CHAPTER 4, SECTION 4.1 COMMERCIAL RETAIL AND MIXED USE IN THE ASOM IS TO BE USED AS A GUIDELINE FOR FACADE DESIGN, MATERIALS, TRANSPARENCY AND SCREENING. FACADE IMPROVEMENTS: TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE APPLEWOOD SHOPPING CENTER PCD AND USE CHAPTER a, SECTION 4.1 COMMERCIAL RETAIL AND MIXED USE IN THE ASOM AS A GUIDELINE. MINOR ADDITIONS: (LESS THAN 50% INCREASE IN THE EXISTING BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE) TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE APPLEWOOD SHOPPING CENTER PCO. OWNER'S CERTIFICATE The below signed owner(s). a legally designated agertt(s) thereof, do hereby agree that the property Iogauy descnbed hereon will be developed as a Planned Developmem in accordance with the uses. restrictions and conditions Contained in this plan, and as may otherwise be required by law. 1 I-) further 1-9-a that Me approval of a -onrtg to Planned Development, and approval of this outime development plan, does not create a vested propend ngttt. Vested propend rights may ony arse and acwe pursuam to the provisions of Section 26-121 of the Wheal Ridge Code of Is U.S. Retail Partners, LLC Slate of Colorado ) )SS Couny of Jeeerson ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _day of . A.D. 20 by Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE 1, Cameron M. Walson, do hereby comfy that Me survey of the boundary of Applewood Village Shopping Center was made by me or- my direct supervisor and to the best of my knowledge, information and oelief, n accordance with all applicable Colorado statutes. current rawsed edition as amended. the accompanying plan accurately represents said survey (SurveyDrs Seal) Signature CITY CERTIFICATION Approved this day of by the Wheat Ridge City Council. ATTEST City Clerk Maya Community Development Director PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION Recommended for approval this day of . by the Wheat Ridge Planning Commission. Chairperson COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDERS CERTIFICATE State of Colorado ) ISS County of Jefferson ) I hereby cortify Mat this plan was filed �n the offce of the County Clerk and Recorder of Jefferson County at Golden. Colorado, at o'clock M. on the day of AD.. m oo Bk_ Page_ Reception No. JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER By: Deputy LANDSCAPE AREA: EACH REQUIRED SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN (SDP) IS TO MEET OR EXCEED THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPE REOUIREMENTS OF THIS ODP. SCREENING TRASH ENCLOSURES: MATCH PRIMARY BUILDING MATERIALS. ROOF EQUIPMENT: SCREENED WITH PARAPETS. GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT'. SCREENED WITH LANDSCAPING OR FENCING. LOADING AREAS: SCREENED WITH LANDSCAPING OR BUILDING ELEMENTS AT THE OWNER'S DISCRETION. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Recommended for approval this bay of _, by Me Wheat Ridge Etbromic Development Dmswn. Economic Development Manager SITE LOCATION SITE DEVELOPMENT STATISTICS EXISTING OVERALL: A SITE AREA - 1,436,304 SF = 32.97 ACRES B. GROSS BUILDING AREA - 387,110 SF= 26.9% C. LANDSCAPED AREA- 148.694 SF= 10.35% D. PARKING AREA- 907,472 SF - 632% E. PARKING SPACE SUMMARY SPACES REQUIRED 1,548 (4. D/ 1DOD SF BLDG( SPACES PROVIDED INCLUDES 56 ACCESSIBLE F. USES PERMITTED- ALL C-1 G. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT - 50 GENERAL NOTES: PROPOSED OVERALL WITH AMENDMENT 9- A SITE AREA- 1,505,152 SF = 34 554 ACRES 8. GROSS BUILDING AREA - 35% MAXIMUM MAXIMUM ALLOWED. 526.803 SF= 35% C. LANDSCAPED AREA -10% MINIMUM MINIMUM REQUIRED'. 150,515 SF= 10% D. PARKING AREA -55%MINIMUM E. PARKING SPACE SUMMARY SPACES REQUIRED -4 CARS PER 1000 GROSS S.F. F. USES PERMITTED- ALL C-1 USES, MOTOR FUELING. DRIVE-THROUGH BANKING FACILITIES. DRIVE THROUGH EATING ESTABLISHMENTS AND ITINERANT SALES PURSUANT TO SECTION 26-627 OF THE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 1. THIS OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE. SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENTS SUCH AS SITE LAYOUT AND BUILDING ARCHITECTURE HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSED ON THIS DOCUMENT. AS A RESULT, A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PRIOR TO THE SUBMITTAL OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY OR BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION FOR SUBSEQUENT SITE DEVELOPMENT. 2. EACH SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN (SDP) SHALL MEET THE INTENT OF THE SITE DEVELOPMENT STATISTICS, ABOVE. AS INTERPRETED BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE ADMINISTRATION. 3. FENCING SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 26-603 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 4. SITE AND BUILDING LIGHTING FOR NEW SITE DEVELOPMENT AREAS SHALL BE REVIEWED BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE ADMINISTRATION TO CONFIRM CONSISTENCY WITH THE GOALS OF THE DEVELOPMENT. 5. SIGNAGE FOR NEW SITE DEVELOPMENT AREAS SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH ARTICLE VII OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE UNLESS MODIFIED BY A FUTURE MASTER SIGN PLAN OR APPROVED BY CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE ADMINISTRATION WITH THE SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. 6. LANDSCAPE MATERIAL QUANTITIES AND SIZES LOCATED WITHIN NEW SITE DEVELOPMENT AREAS SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 26-02 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 7. THE OWNER. HIS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS GRANT RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGE OF ACCESS TO. AND FREE MOVEMENT THROUGH ALL CURB CUTS, PARKING AREAS, AND DRIVE AISLES WITHIN THE SHOPPING CENTER TO CUSTOMERS AND PATRONS OF THE SHOPPING CENTER. 8 BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 26-501.E.4 OF THE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE 9 DEVELOPMENT IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE CENTER SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR UPGRADED VERTICAL LANDSCAPING REDUCTION OF LIGHTING AT NIGHT AND HOURS OF OP A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BELOW: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29 AND CONSIDERING THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER TO BEAR SB9'29'29'W WITH ALL BEARINGS HEREIN RELATIVE THERETO. THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE. S89 -29'29W A DISTANCE OF 1263.09 FEET, THENCE NOO'3Q3l'W, A DISTANCE OF 98.24 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID POINT BEING ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR YOUNGFIELD STREET AND 60.00 FEET EAST OF THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29; THENCE PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29. N00'54'01 -W, A DISTANCE OF 556.10 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1. APPLEWOOD VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER SUBDIVISION THENCE THE FOLLOWING TEN (10) COURSES ALONG THE WEST, NORTH AND EAST BOUNDARIES OF SAID LOT 1: 1. CONTINUING PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-OUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29, NOO'54'01 W, A DISTANCE OF 667.77 FEET. 2. N89'26'17'E, A DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET. T NOO.54'OM, A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET; 4. S89'26'17W, A DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET; 5. PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-OUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29. NOO.54.01-W, A DISTANCE OF 135 14 FEET; 6. ALONG THE ARC OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 182.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 77.25.57', AN ARC DISTANCE OF 245.96 FEET WITH A CHORD BEARING N37 -48.56-E. A DISTANCE OF 227.67 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT -CF -WAV FOR W. 38TH AVE.; 7. ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT -QF -WAV, N76'31'47'E, A DISTANCE OF 701.71 FEET; 8. SOO:46'08-E. A DISTANCE OF 670.37 FEET; 9.S89 . S8926'17'W, A DISTANCE OF 0.68 FEET; 10. S00'53.19 -E. A DISTANCE OF 762.82 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 2. APPLEWOOD VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER SUBDIVISION, THENCE CONTINUING, SOO.53'19'E ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 2, A DISTANCE OF 133.50 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 19. APPLEWOOD VILLAGE; THENCE THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) COURSES ALONG THE NORTHERLY, EASTERLY AND SOUTH BOUNDARIES OF LOTS 19 AND 20, APPLEWOOD VILLAGE: /. S48'30'24 -E, A DISTANCE OF 234.05 FEET; 2. ALONG THE ARC OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 45.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 188'38'41', AN ARC DISTANCE OF 148.16 FEET WITH A CHORD BEARING S37'10'16'W. A DISTANCE OF 69.74 FEET; 3. SOO'54-01-E. A DISTANCE OF 38.91 FEET; 4. S89 29'29"W. A DISTANCE OF 111.57 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 20: THENCE CONTINUING. SIA DISTANCE OF 37.43 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 23. APPLEWOOD VILLAGE; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 23. SOO-54'01'E. A DISTANCE OF 11521 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE PARCEL DESCRIBED BY THE SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. 2008031587; THENCE THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL: 1. N82:331:21 -W. A DISTANCE OF 83.90 FEET; 2 N88I59'W. A DISTANCE OF 72.07 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PARCEL DESCRIBED BY THE BARGAIN AND SALE DEED RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. 2006093175; THENCE THE FOLLOWING TEN (10) COURSES ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL: 1. N88* 14'22W, A DISTANCE OF 58.35 FEET; 2. ALONG THE ARC OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 9.50 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 87.14.16'. AN ARC DISTANCE OF 14.46 FEET WITH A CHORD BEARING N44 -37.16W, A DISTANCE OF 13.11 FEET; 3. S89'05'15W, A DISTANCE OF 87.36 FEET: 4. SDO'24'32'E. A DISTANCE OF 8.16 FEET; 5. ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 9.50 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89.3721', AN ARC DISTANCE OF 14.85 FEET WITH A CHORD BEARING S44'21'39W. A DISTANCE OF 13.38 FEET: 6. 589.07'49%, A DISTANCE OF 136.21 FEET; 7. ALONG THE ARC OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT RAVING A RADIUS OF 9.50 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90'4044', AN ARC DISTANCE OF 15.04 FEET WITH A CHORD BEARING N45 -31'50W, A DISTANCE OF 13.51 FEET; 8. NOVI 1'28W, A DISTANCE OF 2 D FEET: 9, S89'48'32'W, A DISTANCE OF 32.54 FEET; 10. THENCE SDO'54'DE 1', A DISTANCE OF 4.64 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PARCEL DESCRIBED BY THE SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. 2011096840; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL S89'2429'W, A DISTANCE OF 149.91 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PARCEL DESCRIBED BY THE SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. 2011D96812: THENCE THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL I. CONTINUING S89'29'29W, A DISTANCE OF 100.77 FEET; 2. ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 39.50 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89.36.53'. AN ARC DISTANCE OF 61.78 FEET WITH A CHORD BEARING N45'4705 W, A DISTANCE OF 55.67 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 1,505,152 SQUARE FEET OR 34.554 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. CASE HISTORY WZ-73-14:RG1 to RC WZ-75-15:RC to PUD WZ-77-19: 1st amendmem WZ-82.6: 2nd amendment Ai 14 ;5 3rd amendment 3rd stn amendment WZ-94-4 5th amendment MS -96-2'. plat WZ-98.1' 6th amendment WZ-0409: 7th amendment WZ-10-06: 8th amendment WZ-14-9. 9th amendment SHEETINDEX 1 COVER SHEET 2 OVERALL SITE PLAN ERATION LIMITATIONS. Naos Design Group, LLC Ktmley Horn APPLEWOOD VILLAGE 4949 SOUTH SYRACUSE ST. SUITE 460 990 SOUTH BROADWAY SUITE 200naos (pD 03 759.570aosd 7Y0.30?4281 37 DENVER, COLORADO 80209SHOPPING CENTER EXHIBIT 3 1 of 2 (p) 303.228.2300 www.naosdg.com M7WAW.kimley-horn.com 1"1 - -- - -_ - - - /'% - -- i - .. - REVISION DATE: 2/17/15 F AVENUE WEST 3B1h O O rc O a WEST 32nd AVENUE W N r7 w NO w o 7Q O r WEST 32nd AVENUE ,LP Q0 =ht,. SITE DEVELOPMENT STATISTICS EXISTING OVERALL: A SITE AREA - 1,436,304 SF = 32.97 ACRES B. GROSS BUILDING AREA - 387,110 SF= 26.9% C. LANDSCAPED AREA- 148.694 SF= 10.35% D. PARKING AREA- 907,472 SF - 632% E. PARKING SPACE SUMMARY SPACES REQUIRED 1,548 (4. D/ 1DOD SF BLDG( SPACES PROVIDED INCLUDES 56 ACCESSIBLE F. USES PERMITTED- ALL C-1 G. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT - 50 GENERAL NOTES: PROPOSED OVERALL WITH AMENDMENT 9- A SITE AREA- 1,505,152 SF = 34 554 ACRES 8. GROSS BUILDING AREA - 35% MAXIMUM MAXIMUM ALLOWED. 526.803 SF= 35% C. LANDSCAPED AREA -10% MINIMUM MINIMUM REQUIRED'. 150,515 SF= 10% D. PARKING AREA -55%MINIMUM E. PARKING SPACE SUMMARY SPACES REQUIRED -4 CARS PER 1000 GROSS S.F. F. USES PERMITTED- ALL C-1 USES, MOTOR FUELING. DRIVE-THROUGH BANKING FACILITIES. DRIVE THROUGH EATING ESTABLISHMENTS AND ITINERANT SALES PURSUANT TO SECTION 26-627 OF THE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 1. THIS OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE. SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENTS SUCH AS SITE LAYOUT AND BUILDING ARCHITECTURE HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSED ON THIS DOCUMENT. AS A RESULT, A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PRIOR TO THE SUBMITTAL OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY OR BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION FOR SUBSEQUENT SITE DEVELOPMENT. 2. EACH SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN (SDP) SHALL MEET THE INTENT OF THE SITE DEVELOPMENT STATISTICS, ABOVE. AS INTERPRETED BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE ADMINISTRATION. 3. FENCING SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 26-603 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 4. SITE AND BUILDING LIGHTING FOR NEW SITE DEVELOPMENT AREAS SHALL BE REVIEWED BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE ADMINISTRATION TO CONFIRM CONSISTENCY WITH THE GOALS OF THE DEVELOPMENT. 5. SIGNAGE FOR NEW SITE DEVELOPMENT AREAS SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH ARTICLE VII OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE UNLESS MODIFIED BY A FUTURE MASTER SIGN PLAN OR APPROVED BY CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE ADMINISTRATION WITH THE SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. 6. LANDSCAPE MATERIAL QUANTITIES AND SIZES LOCATED WITHIN NEW SITE DEVELOPMENT AREAS SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 26-02 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 7. THE OWNER. HIS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS GRANT RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGE OF ACCESS TO. AND FREE MOVEMENT THROUGH ALL CURB CUTS, PARKING AREAS, AND DRIVE AISLES WITHIN THE SHOPPING CENTER TO CUSTOMERS AND PATRONS OF THE SHOPPING CENTER. 8 BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 26-501.E.4 OF THE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE 9 DEVELOPMENT IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE CENTER SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR UPGRADED VERTICAL LANDSCAPING REDUCTION OF LIGHTING AT NIGHT AND HOURS OF OP A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BELOW: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29 AND CONSIDERING THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER TO BEAR SB9'29'29'W WITH ALL BEARINGS HEREIN RELATIVE THERETO. THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE. S89 -29'29W A DISTANCE OF 1263.09 FEET, THENCE NOO'3Q3l'W, A DISTANCE OF 98.24 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID POINT BEING ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR YOUNGFIELD STREET AND 60.00 FEET EAST OF THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29; THENCE PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29. N00'54'01 -W, A DISTANCE OF 556.10 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1. APPLEWOOD VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER SUBDIVISION THENCE THE FOLLOWING TEN (10) COURSES ALONG THE WEST, NORTH AND EAST BOUNDARIES OF SAID LOT 1: 1. CONTINUING PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-OUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29, NOO'54'01 W, A DISTANCE OF 667.77 FEET. 2. N89'26'17'E, A DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET. T NOO.54'OM, A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET; 4. S89'26'17W, A DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET; 5. PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-OUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29. NOO.54.01-W, A DISTANCE OF 135 14 FEET; 6. ALONG THE ARC OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 182.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 77.25.57', AN ARC DISTANCE OF 245.96 FEET WITH A CHORD BEARING N37 -48.56-E. A DISTANCE OF 227.67 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT -CF -WAV FOR W. 38TH AVE.; 7. ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT -QF -WAV, N76'31'47'E, A DISTANCE OF 701.71 FEET; 8. SOO:46'08-E. A DISTANCE OF 670.37 FEET; 9.S89 . S8926'17'W, A DISTANCE OF 0.68 FEET; 10. S00'53.19 -E. A DISTANCE OF 762.82 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 2. APPLEWOOD VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER SUBDIVISION, THENCE CONTINUING, SOO.53'19'E ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 2, A DISTANCE OF 133.50 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 19. APPLEWOOD VILLAGE; THENCE THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) COURSES ALONG THE NORTHERLY, EASTERLY AND SOUTH BOUNDARIES OF LOTS 19 AND 20, APPLEWOOD VILLAGE: /. S48'30'24 -E, A DISTANCE OF 234.05 FEET; 2. ALONG THE ARC OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 45.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 188'38'41', AN ARC DISTANCE OF 148.16 FEET WITH A CHORD BEARING S37'10'16'W. A DISTANCE OF 69.74 FEET; 3. SOO'54-01-E. A DISTANCE OF 38.91 FEET; 4. S89 29'29"W. A DISTANCE OF 111.57 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 20: THENCE CONTINUING. SIA DISTANCE OF 37.43 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 23. APPLEWOOD VILLAGE; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 23. SOO-54'01'E. A DISTANCE OF 11521 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE PARCEL DESCRIBED BY THE SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. 2008031587; THENCE THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL: 1. N82:331:21 -W. A DISTANCE OF 83.90 FEET; 2 N88I59'W. A DISTANCE OF 72.07 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PARCEL DESCRIBED BY THE BARGAIN AND SALE DEED RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. 2006093175; THENCE THE FOLLOWING TEN (10) COURSES ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL: 1. N88* 14'22W, A DISTANCE OF 58.35 FEET; 2. ALONG THE ARC OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 9.50 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 87.14.16'. AN ARC DISTANCE OF 14.46 FEET WITH A CHORD BEARING N44 -37.16W, A DISTANCE OF 13.11 FEET; 3. S89'05'15W, A DISTANCE OF 87.36 FEET: 4. SDO'24'32'E. A DISTANCE OF 8.16 FEET; 5. ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 9.50 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89.3721', AN ARC DISTANCE OF 14.85 FEET WITH A CHORD BEARING S44'21'39W. A DISTANCE OF 13.38 FEET: 6. 589.07'49%, A DISTANCE OF 136.21 FEET; 7. ALONG THE ARC OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT RAVING A RADIUS OF 9.50 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90'4044', AN ARC DISTANCE OF 15.04 FEET WITH A CHORD BEARING N45 -31'50W, A DISTANCE OF 13.51 FEET; 8. NOVI 1'28W, A DISTANCE OF 2 D FEET: 9, S89'48'32'W, A DISTANCE OF 32.54 FEET; 10. THENCE SDO'54'DE 1', A DISTANCE OF 4.64 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PARCEL DESCRIBED BY THE SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. 2011096840; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL S89'2429'W, A DISTANCE OF 149.91 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PARCEL DESCRIBED BY THE SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. 2011D96812: THENCE THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL I. CONTINUING S89'29'29W, A DISTANCE OF 100.77 FEET; 2. ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 39.50 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89.36.53'. AN ARC DISTANCE OF 61.78 FEET WITH A CHORD BEARING N45'4705 W, A DISTANCE OF 55.67 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 1,505,152 SQUARE FEET OR 34.554 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. CASE HISTORY WZ-73-14:RG1 to RC WZ-75-15:RC to PUD WZ-77-19: 1st amendmem WZ-82.6: 2nd amendment Ai 14 ;5 3rd amendment 3rd stn amendment WZ-94-4 5th amendment MS -96-2'. plat WZ-98.1' 6th amendment WZ-0409: 7th amendment WZ-10-06: 8th amendment WZ-14-9. 9th amendment SHEETINDEX 1 COVER SHEET 2 OVERALL SITE PLAN ERATION LIMITATIONS. Naos Design Group, LLC Ktmley Horn APPLEWOOD VILLAGE 4949 SOUTH SYRACUSE ST. SUITE 460 990 SOUTH BROADWAY SUITE 200naos (pD 03 759.570aosd 7Y0.30?4281 37 DENVER, COLORADO 80209SHOPPING CENTER EXHIBIT 3 1 of 2 (p) 303.228.2300 www.naosdg.com M7WAW.kimley-horn.com 1"1 - -- - -_ - - - /'% - -- i - .. - REVISION DATE: 2/17/15 F APPLEWOOD VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER - AMENDMENT #9 OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN LAND LOCATED IN THE EAST 1/2 OF THE N.W. 1/4 OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. RIVERVIEW ACRES THIRD FILING ZONED R -1A ZONED R-2 ACCESS MO. __ a 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ZONED R -1A 1 111 111 111 111 O 111 1w1 \ z _ /\Jr�_► � 111111 ^c°�e 0 ACCESS DRI E �� ° =% 1111 � •. 1/ � / \ � / \ \ \ / ZONED R -1A 11 11 i \ ACCESS DRIVE 1 � ZONED R-1 No - WRIGHT STREET L_ Ju ---I --------------- --- ------------- ---- -- - — y — _ > a IYQITNGFIECQ STREET_ y I ZONED NC WRIGHT COURT WKj1 /ATER ZONED NC WINH 'I L1 L-LLLI{ 7777-4 Kimley Horn 990 SOUTH BROADWAY SUITE 200 DENVER, COLORADO 80209 (p) 303.228.2300 APPLEWOOD VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER SHEET N O . 2 O 1f 2 APPLEWOOD -t- VILL04GE D N O N D) M TA LS �TRrt� ZI XENON STREET ZON D R -1A nimim L_ Ju ---I --------------- --- ------------- ---- -- - — y — _ > a IYQITNGFIECQ STREET_ y I ZONED NC WRIGHT COURT WKj1 /ATER ZONED NC WINH 'I L1 L-LLLI{ 7777-4 NOTES: ® 1. EXISTING BUILDINGS SHOWN HATCHED 2. AREAS OF POSSIBLE DEVELOPMENT OR REDEVELOPMENT ARE LABELED *FUTURE SOP AREA, 3. EXIS71NG IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED TO REMOVED ARE S IMPROVEMENTS MAY,ALSO BE REMOVED AND WILL BE IDENTIFIED IN FUTURE SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS. 4. ALL FUTURE DEVELOPMENT MAY NOT BE LABELED 'FUTURE SOP MEA' BUT WILL STILL BE SUBJECT TO SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS (SDP). I ZONED R2 I I I I I WRIGHT COURT I � SS DRIVE I ZONED R2 I, I Ij I II I I Kimley Horn 990 SOUTH BROADWAY SUITE 200 DENVER, COLORADO 80209 (p) 303.228.2300 APPLEWOOD VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER SHEET N O . 2 O 1f 2 }_ -t- j D N O N D) M TA LS �TRrt� ZI XENON STREET nimim m I 111I c_- � Iil 111111 IIII .._ �Il Ll 111 L111J� SII QI v 1-70 INTERSTATE HWY v V v V NOTES: ® 1. EXISTING BUILDINGS SHOWN HATCHED 2. AREAS OF POSSIBLE DEVELOPMENT OR REDEVELOPMENT ARE LABELED *FUTURE SOP AREA, 3. EXIS71NG IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED TO REMOVED ARE S IMPROVEMENTS MAY,ALSO BE REMOVED AND WILL BE IDENTIFIED IN FUTURE SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS. 4. ALL FUTURE DEVELOPMENT MAY NOT BE LABELED 'FUTURE SOP MEA' BUT WILL STILL BE SUBJECT TO SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS (SDP). I ZONED R2 I I I I I WRIGHT COURT I � SS DRIVE I ZONED R2 I, I Ij I II I I L----------------- -------W W - - - - - --R - rx- - - Kimley Horn 990 SOUTH BROADWAY SUITE 200 DENVER, COLORADO 80209 (p) 303.228.2300 APPLEWOOD VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER SHEET N O . 2 O 1f 2 T MIT « ACj SS DRIVE j D N O N D) M TA LS �TRrt� ZI XENON STREET nimim m I 111I c_- � Iil 111111 IIII .._ �Il Ll 111 L111J� SII QI v 1-70 INTERSTATE HWY v V v V 0 Z I V Q Q Q Q Q Q Q �Q ZONED NC � - I �•� iLtC I i �\n \ «A� S DRIVE _ ,r L----------------- -------W W - - - - - --R - rx- - - THE ACCESS POINTS AND INTERNAL CIRCULATION SHOWN ON THIS ODP REFLECT THE EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT AT THE TIME OF THE ADOPTION OF THE ODP. THE ACCESS POINTS MAY CHANGE. LIKELY CONSOLIDATED, AS INDIVIDUAL PARCELS ARE REDEVELOPED AND INCORPORATED INTO THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT. THIS WOULD ALSO LIKELY CAUSE A CHANGE IN THE INTERNAL CIRCULATION SHOWN ON THE ODP. CHANGES TO THE NUMBER AND LOCATION OF THE ACCESS POINTS AND RESULTING CHANGES TO THE INTERNAL CIRCULATION THAT MAY OCCUR AS A RESULT OF REDEVELOPMENT OF INDIVIDUAL OR MULTIPLE PARCELS WILL BE EVALUATED DURING THE REVIEW OF THE SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR THOSE PARCELS. REVISIONS TO THE ODP WILL NOT BE REWIRED UNLESS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. 80 40 0 80 SCALE 1" = 80' Naos Design Group, LLC 4949 SOUTH SYRACUSE ST. SUITE 460 DENVER, COLORADO 80237 O (p) 303.759.5777 (1) 720.360.4281 S S Kimley Horn 990 SOUTH BROADWAY SUITE 200 DENVER, COLORADO 80209 (p) 303.228.2300 APPLEWOOD VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER SHEET N O . 2 O 1f 2 • www.naosdg.com www.kimley-horn.com u D N O N D) M TA rn D) all v v v 1-70 INTERSTATE HWY v V v V 0 V Q V Q Q Q Q Q Q Q �Q THE ACCESS POINTS AND INTERNAL CIRCULATION SHOWN ON THIS ODP REFLECT THE EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT AT THE TIME OF THE ADOPTION OF THE ODP. THE ACCESS POINTS MAY CHANGE. LIKELY CONSOLIDATED, AS INDIVIDUAL PARCELS ARE REDEVELOPED AND INCORPORATED INTO THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT. THIS WOULD ALSO LIKELY CAUSE A CHANGE IN THE INTERNAL CIRCULATION SHOWN ON THE ODP. CHANGES TO THE NUMBER AND LOCATION OF THE ACCESS POINTS AND RESULTING CHANGES TO THE INTERNAL CIRCULATION THAT MAY OCCUR AS A RESULT OF REDEVELOPMENT OF INDIVIDUAL OR MULTIPLE PARCELS WILL BE EVALUATED DURING THE REVIEW OF THE SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR THOSE PARCELS. REVISIONS TO THE ODP WILL NOT BE REWIRED UNLESS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. 80 40 0 80 SCALE 1" = 80' Naos Design Group, LLC 4949 SOUTH SYRACUSE ST. SUITE 460 DENVER, COLORADO 80237 O (p) 303.759.5777 (1) 720.360.4281 S S Kimley Horn 990 SOUTH BROADWAY SUITE 200 DENVER, COLORADO 80209 (p) 303.228.2300 APPLEWOOD VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER SHEET N O . 2 O 1f 2 • www.naosdg.com www.kimley-horn.com REVISION DATE: 2/17/15 RanPnnv C;PntPr-q RF\/ICIrIAI r1ATF• 1n/14A& PREPARED BY: NAGS DESIGN GROUP, LLC CC AI F• AQ CHr1WAl . matt- 91`11nnil . IRRI IF rIATF• nQ/19Hd EXHIBIT 3 -APPROVED ODP EXHIBIT 4 -REDEVELOPMENT AREA EXHIBIT 5 -SITE PHOTOS View north from 32nd at site — red building in background is Chili's restaurant View north at Applejack alley — in the image, the subject site is to the left — brown building to the right is the old Wells Fargo Bank building CIVIL ENGINEER STERLING DESIGN ASSOCIATES. LLC 2009 W. LITTLETON BLVD 9300 LITTLETON. CO 80120 (303) 7944727 CONTACT MR JOEL TOMPKINS, PE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT STERLING DESIGN ASSOCIATES. LLC 2009 W LITTLETON BLVD 9300 LITTLETON. CO 80120 (303)794-4727 CONTACT. MR WAYNE STERLING. RLA SURVEYOR POINT CONSULTING. LLC 8341 S SANGRE OE CRISTO LITTLETON. CO 00127 (720) 258.8838 CONTACT. CAMERON M WATSON. PLS ARCHITECT FREIHEIT & NO ARCHITECTS, INC.. P S. 5209 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD NE SUITE 200 KIRKLAND. WA 98033 (425)827-2100 CONTACTMR. THOMAS L SPARER. AIA CHARACTER OF DEVELOPMENT IT IS THE INTENT OF REGENCY CENTERS. L P TO REDEVELOP A PORTION OF THE SOUTHAEST CORNER OF THE APPLEWOOD VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER INTO A 2,500 SF STARBUCKS CAFE WITH A DRIVE-THRU AND ASSOCIATED PARKING INDOOR AND OUTDOOR PATIO SEATING WILL BE PROVIDED. ACCESS TO THE SITE WALL BE FROM AN IMPROVED ENTRANCE ON W 32ND AVENUE AND FROM WITHIN THE SHOPPING CENTER PARKING LOT ALONG THE EASTERN PROPERTY BOUNDARY A RIGHT -OUT -ONLY ON THE WESTERN PROPERTY BOUNDARY PROVIDES EGRESS ONTO YOUNGFIELD STREET AND AN INGRESS/EXIT DRIVE AISLE AT THE EASTERN BOUNDARY PROVIDES EGRESS INTO THE SHOPPING CENTER TO THE NORTH AND ONTO W 32ND AVENUE TO THE SOUTH. THE PROPERTY IS WITHIN THE "CONTEMPORARY OVERLAY DISTRICT- VO4ICH REQUIRES A 0'-20' BUILD -TO LINE WHERE BUILDINGS ARE ADJACENT TO PUBLIC STREETS INCLUDED IN THIS REQUEST ARE VARIANCES TO THE REQUIRED BUILD -TO LINE FROM BOTH WEST 32ND AVENUE AND YOUNGFIELD STREET. THE BUILDING HAS BEEN POSITIONED IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN VEHICULAR CIRCULATION ON SITE AND WITHIN THE SHOPPING CENTER, WHILE ADDITIONALLY SCREENING THE DRIVE-THRU LANE FROM OFF-SITE TRAFFIC. THE SITE WILL PROVIDE AMPLE OFF-STREET PARKING AND DRIVE-THRU STACKING OF UP TO ELEVEN CARS BEFORE ONSITE CIRCULATION IS AFFECTED. A PROPOSED ON-SITE SIDEWALK AND WALKWAY CONNECTION TO THE W. 32ND AVENUE SIDEWALK WILL PROMOTE A PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY ENTRANCE TO THE STARBUCKS CAFE. LANDSCAPE AREAS WALL UTILIZE COLORFUL AND TEXTURAL LOW WATER DEMAND PLANTINGS AND TREES. THE BUILDING DESIGN UTIUZES A VARIETY OF MATERIALS INCLUDING STONE. BRICK. GLASS. STUCCO. AND STRUCTURAL STEEL CANOPIES. THEBUILDING MASS CONTAINS VARIED ROOF LINES AND MULTIPLE HORIZONTALIVERTICAL WALLPLANES. SITE ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES INCLUDE A REFUSE ENCLOSURE AND LOW SCREEN WALLS. ALL OF WHICH ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLEMENT THE CHARACTER AND MATERIALS OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING STARBUCKS DRIVE-THRU - APPLEWOOD VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER PCD AMENDMENT #1 AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE COLORADO SITUATED IN THE SE 1/4, NW 1/4, SECTION 29, T 3 S., R 69 W. OF THE 6TH P.M. H CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN PROPERTY OWNER REGENCY CENTERS 8480 EAST ORCHARD ROAD, SUITES900 GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80111 (303)300-5335 CONTACT. MR WILL DAMRATH DEVELOPER REGENCY CENTERS 8480 EAST ORCHARD ROAD. SUITE 69W GREENWOOD VILLAGE. 00 80111 (303)300.5335 CONTACT. MR. WILL DAMRATH CASE HISTORY VICINITY MAP 32ND AVE SHEET INDEX I OF I I COVER SHEET 2 OF I I SITE PLAN 3 OF I I LANDSCAPE PLAN 4 OF I I LANDSCAPE NOTES & DETAILS 5 OF I I PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 6 OF I I SIGNAGE PLAN 70F I I SIGNAGE DETAILS 8OFII SIGNAGE DETAILS 9 OF I I BUILDING ELEVATIONS 10 OF 1 I BUILDING ELEVATIONS I I OF I I AERIAL PERSPECTIVE SUP -13.04, WZ-14-. MS -11.1. WZ-1502(TINS REQUEST), WA -15-M SIGNATURE BLOCKS LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 29. TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH. RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE. COUNTY OF JEFFERSON. STATE OF COLORADO. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SAID NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 29 AND CONSIDERING THE SOUTH UNE OF THE SND NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER TO BEAR S89'2929'W VATH ALL BEARINGS HEREIN RELATIVE THERETO. THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE. S89'2929W. A INSTANCE OF gn 51 FEET. THENCE PW5401 ,, A DISTANCE OF 59.OD FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE 539'2929'W PARALLEL TO AND 59.00 FEET NORTH OF SAID SOUTH UNE OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER. A DISTANCE OF 250.68 FEET, THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF ACURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING RADIUS OF 39.50 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89'3857. AN ARC DISTANCE OF 61.78 FEET. HAVING A CHORD WINCH BEARS N45L204W. A DISTANCE OF 55.67 FEET. THENCE N00'5401 .. A DISTANCE OF 81 76 FEET, THENCE NB9'2925'E. A DISTANCE OF 289.91 FEET, THENCE SOO'5401'E. A DISTANCE OF 121.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING CONTNNING 34.748 SQUARE FEET OR 0 798 ACRES. MORE OR LESS PROPERTYADDRESS 12755W32MAVENUE SITE DATA TABLE I EXISTING ZONING I PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT (PCD) WI NTEMPoRARY O R Y PROPOSED LAND USE CAFE WITH DRIVE-THRU TOTAL AREA ACRES/SF GROSS 79S AC 134,748 SF (INCLUDES RIGHT-OF-WAY RESERVATIONS FOR W 32ND AVE AND YOUNGFIELD STREET) PROPOSED FLOOR AREA BY USE BUILDING GROSS FLOOR AREA 2.553 SF COVERED PATIO 465 SF REQUIRED/ALLOWED PROPOSED LOT SIZE .798 AC / 31,748 SF BUILDING COVERAGE 35% MAX 112.162 SF MAX 9%/ 3,018 SF OPEN SPACEMNDSCAPING LIVING LANDSCAPING 10%MIN/3,475 SFMIN 23%/ 8.1243E WWRDSCAPE(UNCOVERED PATIOS. INTERNAL SDWLKS) 55% MAX 119.111 SF MAX 8%f3,258 SF HARD SURFACE (A KING. DRIVES 8 OTHER HARD SURFACES I14/1 ,111 IN PARKING CARS 411,000 SF 112 SPACES 1/1000 SF/ 31 SPACES INCLUDES 2 HC) HC ACCESSIBLE 1/25 REO'D SPACES/ 1 2 SPACES BICYCLE 5% OF REO'D PARKING 11 4 SPACES STACKING SPACES FROM THE ORDER BOX 8 - 1B' LONG SPACES 8 - 20' LONG SPACES ORDER BOX TO PICKU1, 4 - 1' LONG SPACES 5 - 20' LORD SPACES NUIC REQUIREMENTS BASED ON APPLEWOOD VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER AMENDMENT OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PUN DATED 2/172015 AND RECORDED UNDER RECEPTION NUMBER OWNER'S CERTIFICATE THE BELOW SIGNED OWNERS). OR LEGALLY DESIGNATED AGENT(S) THEREOF, DO HEREBY AGREE THAT THE PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED HEREON WILL BE DEVELOPED AS A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE USES, RESTRICTIONS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED IN THIS PLAN, AND AS MAY OTHERWISE BE REQUIRED BY LAW. I (WE) FURTHER RECOGNIZE THAT THE APPROVAL OF THIS SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN, DOES NOT CREATE A VESTED PROPERTY RIGHT. VESTED PROPERTY RIGHTS MAY ONLY ARISE AND ACCRUE PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 26-121 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS ERIC CHEKAL FOR REGENCY CENTERS. L.P. STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF JEFFERSON ) )SS THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF A D 20_ BY WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: NOTARY PUBLIC SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE 1, CAMERON M. WATSON DOHEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARY OF STARBUCKS DRIVE-THRU WAS MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. INFORMATION AND BEUEF, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE COLORADO STATUTES, CURRENT REVISED EDITION AS AMENDED. THE ACCOMPANYING PLAN ACCURATELY REPRESENTS SAID SURVEY. (SURVEYORS SEAL) SIGNATURE COUNTY CLERK 6 RECORDERS CERTIFICATE STATE OF COLORADO ) )SS COUNTY OF JEFFERSON ) 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNT CLERK AND RECORDER OF JEFFERSON COUNTY AT GOLDEN. COLORADO. AT O'CLOCK M. ON THE _ DAY OF --A D, IN BOOK . PAGE RECEPTION NO. JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER BY: DEPUTY PUNNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION APPROVED THIS DAY OF BY THE WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION. CHAIRPERSON CITY CERTIFICATION APPROVED THIS _ DAY OF _By THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE ATTEST CITY CLERK MAYOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR 0 Sterling Design Associates, III: CIVIL ENGINEERS - LANDSCAPE Al; 2009 V, Lntl -BAE A300 LktlM CO WIM 3017H.4T27 ph —Sr^I40-.ry u.+racom wrt � 328H6 oxucr wAAca ,. „� VVTB M. 0 01220-031 STARBUCKS DRIVE-THRU 12755 W 32ND AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 EXHIBIT 6 1 OF 11 u n �i II I II �� II I, II I II II I If I II I II Il II it I' ,I 'I it II I it II RIGHT-OUTO PROPOSED FIR HYDRAN I- 8 0' ROW DI II (BY SEPARATE I I q 9 II w O EXIST ASPHALT PAVEMENT II T�L}\ I `EXIST. it CONCRETE/ I ASPHALT PAVEMENT LINE 9 i EXIST. CONCRETE PAVEMENT I II I II I II II� 1 1 1 1 1 STARBUCKS DRIVE-THRU - APPLEWOOD VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER PCD AMENDMENT #1 1 AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO SITUATED IN THE SE 1/4, NW 1/4, SECTION 29, T 3 S., R 69 W. OF THE 6TH P.M. CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXIST. CONCRETE/ ASPHALT PAVEMENT UNE EXIST CONCRETE PAVEMENT_ EXIST_ ASPHALT PAVEMENT — L_ — — — — — — — — _ _CONCRETE MEDIAN H MOUNTABLEGWEIS -- 12JUMBO OR SPEC ' 18GA CORRUGATED METAL PANEL GATES WITH FOR CONSTRUCTION - NEITHER STRUCTURAL. BRICK VENEER. EXPOSED FASTENERS. INSTALL CORRUGATIONS ON HYDRAULIC. GEOTECHNICAL, OR CONSTRUCTION DETAILS COLOR TO HORIZONTAL. PROVIDE ANGLES BEHIND PANELS ARE SHOWN. GRAPHIC INTENT IS ONLY TO INDICATE COMPLEMENT STEEL GATE STRUCTURE. PROVIDE 3 WELDED GENERAL WALL MATERIAL TYPE. COLOR ANDOR TEXTURE BUILDING HINGES EACH SIDE POWDER COATED DARK ARCHITECTURE SLOPED CMU CAP. TYP 0 10 20 40 BRONZE NORTH SCALE. 1"=2a-0' 0 H. I 18.7 FRONT ELEVATON SIDE ELEVATIONS BACK ELEVATION TRASH ENCLOSURE DETAILS C NOT TO SCALE LEGEND ------- PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED ACCESS DRIVE — — — — EASEMENT UNE HEIGHT VARIES. ASPHALT PAVEMENT MAX. HEIGHT =10a. EXIST. CURB AND GUTTER TO BE DESIGN BUILD STARBUCKS DRIVE-THRU COLOR MPLEM TEXTURE TO COMPLEMENT BUILDING 12755 W 32ND AVENUE EXISTING TRANSFORMER WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 PROPOSED AUTOMOBILE PARKING f IH PROP. LIGHT POLE ASPHALT PAVEMENT (MINIMUM) LS LANDSCAPE AREA PC PARKING SPACE PROPOSED ACCESS DRIVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT I PROP SIDEWALK PROP CURB AND GUTTER PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK — — — — — PROP. SAWCUT UNE )) ^ PROP TRAFFIC ARROW OPROP PARKING COUNT • PROP BOLLARD I.• PROP SIGN III PROP FIRE HYDRANT Vc Sterling Design Associates, llc �rvIL ENGINEERS - W IDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 2001 W. LYIMm BMA ANO 303.704A723ph +,wwAMiryDale W�oc1K�<qn 32- HIGH SCREEN WALL. JUMBO OR SPEC BRICK VENEER. (REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) STREET SIDE I I , TOP OF WALL FOUNDATION RETAINING WALL TO BE DESIGN BUILD FINISHED GRADE (W (REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR \/ SPECIFICATIONS) RETAINING WALL \, /\ MATERIALSCOLOR HEIGHT VARIES TO COMPLEMENT ARCHITECTURE6 I 94'MAK KT, ,�L\ TRASH ENCLOSURE I( \ FINISHED GRADE (BW) —E - NOTE. 1. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION . NEITHER STRUCTURAL HYDRAULIC. GEOTECHNICAL. OR CONSTRUCTION DETAILS ARE SHOWN GRAPHIC INTENT IS ONLY TO INDICATE GENERAL WALL MATERIAL TYPE, COLOR AND/OR TEXTURE 2. RETAINING WALL TO BE APPROVED THROUGH A SEPARATE SUBMITTAL. 3 WALLS OVER 30 INCHES IN HEIGHT REQUIRE A ENGINEERED DESIGN TO BE RENEWED AND PERMITTED SEPARATELY 32" HT. SCREEN WALL A NOT TO SCALE TOP OF WALL (TOW) PROP CATCH CURB I (POW) FLOWLINE (FL) aleaue 3125113 1' 274" woAc+wwmen e+A.a WTS MHlw NOTE. 1. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION -NEITHER STRUCTURAL. HYDRAULIC. GEOTECHNICAL, OR CONSTRUCTION DETAILS ARE SHOWN GRAPHIC INTENT IS ONLY TO INDICATE GENERAL WALL MATERIAL TYPE, COLOR AND/OR TEXTURE 12" HT. RETAINING WALL B ce�mm STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY 2401 UTAH AVENUE SOUTH SEATTLE, WA 98134 (206) 318-1575 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN 2 OF 11 MODULAR CONCRETE WALL BLOCKS RETAINING WALL HEIGHT VARIES. 01220-031 MAX. HEIGHT =10a. TO BE DESIGN BUILD STARBUCKS DRIVE-THRU COLOR MPLEM TEXTURE TO COMPLEMENT BUILDING 12755 W 32ND AVENUE ARCHITECTURE AND WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. NOTE. 1. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION -NEITHER STRUCTURAL. HYDRAULIC. GEOTECHNICAL, OR CONSTRUCTION DETAILS ARE SHOWN GRAPHIC INTENT IS ONLY TO INDICATE GENERAL WALL MATERIAL TYPE, COLOR AND/OR TEXTURE 12" HT. RETAINING WALL B ce�mm STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY 2401 UTAH AVENUE SOUTH SEATTLE, WA 98134 (206) 318-1575 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN 2 OF 11 �n I L%Mj 0 10 20 40 NORTH SCALE 1-= 20'-0- STARBUCKS DRIVE-THRU - APPLEWOOD VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER PCD AMENDMENT #1 1 AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO SITUATED IN THE SE 1/4, NW 1/4, SECTION 29, T 3 S., R 69 W. OF THE 6TH P.M. CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. 1`.1-1'.i —13-n—'b-3-1:x--}/-n_.Tr—T•., f`.n /,.n }•n Lurlt sua SdmKM@ WLS12O96 STARBUCKS WHEAT RIDGE, CO PM: ROBBY PLEASE CALL US FOR PRICING AT 1100833.675/ Symbd oy LOW Lumera LLF Oaacrip6m Wm WERE 4 A N.A. 0.980 WLS-EDG-4MB16-E-UL-700-4OK IVMOUNTINGHEIGHT 134 Er 0, 2 B NA 0.990 WLS-EDG-2MB-O6-E-UL-700-4OK 16'MOUNTINGHEIGHT 133.6 2 C NA. 0.9w0 WLS-EDG-5M4)6-E-UL-70D-40K 16' MOUNTING HEIGHT 133 C.I.10cn Summary Label I Units Avg Mar Min I AvgMlin M.. PlSpcll P19pcTD OVERALL PARKING SUMMARY I Fc 3.08 6.5 1.0 1 308 8.50 10 10 NOTES: 1. THE FOOTCANDLE LEVELS AS SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA. ANY SUBSTITUTIONS IN SPECIFIED FIXTURES OR CHANGES TO LAYOUT WILL AFFECT LIGHTING LEVELS SHOWN AND WILL NOT BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF WLS LIGHTING SYSTEMS. 2. THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE SOFFIT I BUILDING LIGHTING IS NOT REFLECTED ON THE DRAWING UNLESS SOFFIT I BUILDING LIGHTING IS SPECIFIED IN THE FIXTURE SCHEDULE BELOW. 3. DISTANCE BETWEEN READINGS 10' 4 FI NAL ADJUSTMENTS TO AIMING ANGLE/DIRECTION OF FIXTURESMAY BE REQUIRED TO ELIMINATE LIGHT TRESPASS OR GLARE ONTO ADJOINING PROPERTIES OR ROADWAYS CAST ALUMINUM - LIGHT POLE AND FIXTURE. POWDER COATED FINISH. BRONZE COLOR. CONCRETE BASE 2 CONCRETE FOOTING PER STRUCTURAL ENGINEER LIGHT POLE DETAIL 1M• a 1'-0 Based on Che mfermabon provided, all dmemuons and lumelrn laGargns anovm represent recommended poeheons The enaneer and/or waltect must datermne app6ca0iliry of me layout to ensOrlg or future field conOEons. Thha hghbng pattern represents illummaOVn levels cWwlated from laboratory data taken under conbplle0 conations uhh.mg --I In standard lamp (abnga m accedence wmh Illummaeng Engmaermq Sonet' approved methods Actual peronnance d any manufacturer's lummare may vary due to variation In ebecmcal voltage, tolerance in lamps and cine, —N, field corWtc,nE FOr.eMW WWGG� p.r bur- fr• ywI - - - �a _1 T ad LE17f ONq •A• 2D 121N• 40 1206• N mw 0D 1606• 100 law 20 7006• p 22116• b Aw 1Ep rias• 70p L06• 770 7D06• ]p 12L6' �eww�o>a�wwwwwa. .d LED S EES SPECIFICATIONS GENERAL IEWIL"10011- $im I—poEW oMn—I—wind loo naRA, wmf. Fuhne tide are 190M req aluminum what Ime9ril, we,tlw-NM LED dor farlparmmt ,r10 Mg11 pMamance alunnun hexUnYf Cawenlere, IMMMYb1g moundlg mtlgd Mountkhq haNvrq„rugged elrest N1mMum ab mwnn o 2 b• fcwre w round pule. Neuro n.fved b/ trb CJl 5ll6- t0 UNC bdu pecad on l' fasten Include kat/d140, gulyd fate year knhilee wanann on Mve ELECTRICAL A1beWl devv a—mmo4atevarkd llghgng,u,,ut from Nglh ppwer. wnM.4XILEm5I001(lel-SOOE perfJl6+w1e1, mingwm )OI:A, I^^9 We IED nurte- 12P 777V 50160 Ns dq 1 tFD old e.s am gaMard. N) a6CJ 50)60 W driver a ptbnal. LED dneeb lune l—r f.m l90ca D () f X d fud ladShip UNn fvovlded wilN Wpy Ship lurWwPp murk aenpn ,*enderd Imyral wealMrtlOhtdMrlralhm vAtn tem,YhY AW u eaay pweer hou4vp. Surge Protafticn rated kat accordance with IEEE C67AI] and AN51 staMMd bl.6l.l. TESTING AND C011PLIANCE - UL leted n the U 5 alhd Canada b wet Iaiboru ere enc/osureda,ullee m66 pat hK 579 wow erderee walmu, pMrecHl a NEMA photerell refprac4 opliom C-1 hoary la CE ce dEw P`M1 khs, npaara 4eefnatiorlN Deh Sir, Afsbvrtgn apMa.'ee. pFT1omXwwdeer a1-M.oBFFrf6woMnnveadh,cpf.p,0hcrplwwµdtdIY1Avh0pe1ehlYaewhpalgleaaaiqlaretreeuenhMrpnel Weereeawignnq wsuEtrm-rCaMonberyaatI. ppba cinmp5yo.a0wp0Wna0mnhrr otJauwbprdm,dvhldaennleeautvsdtabtpaeavd4rapaunm,rMaObWNgwn htvtaM fin -,up <orenroMdeMedhlASTMStadaedB 117. orsea l tl fog r.Nw.r.. pAr w 1n Mad1 n IM US.A M US. are �mpatM win. auwtear wm.r,fM, r.aa,•emw,b wmhnm ANAA. A9pDved at, Ffgen Name ■ Dave WLS L1611116 STSTEMS 1919windwrW Fm worlN 176110 1 6006316711 • Fac617731.a 4 www.MvgM,ng.com • '•Onside, the Impact' y�w.s+l•rwnq a. •+.. n v n1 sTEltutq OEs1ON ASSOMTEs, uC �aw4s, ltEwdas M t W)E Debra! ae w 6Eanearra ueanrrEvlgpaa aNONevlsEaelon wa.a6gs w 2 WE 11,orms r as OE—rw sENaEPFA Ca',COYPIrf a0 ! WTE ai ta:aclewlw . ao • WE av oEawnaa . rq ! WE By a0 a WE n pFCrpaWtd . CAE L26/16 1' w 20'C m4EC7 atarrwg9 mOERNO WTS MN mO.ECi 01220-031 STARBUCKS DRIVE-THRU 12755 W 32ND AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY 2401 UTAH AVENUE SOUTH SEATTLE, WA 98134 (206) 31 8- 1575 SHEET •mlE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 5 of 11 P101 STARBUCKS DRIVE-THRU - APPLEWOOD VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER PCD AMENDMENT #11 AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO SITUATED IN THE SE 1/4, NW 1/4, SECTION 29, T 3 S., R 69 W. OF THE 6TH P.M. CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN DIRECTIONAL SIGN A NOT TO SCALE ASPHALT = `\ `` CV 702 /� CTOZ �Enervu eRlwnu �� \ LANDSCAPING (1) 3u'SCHD. 40 PVC CONDUrt�'`;�\ Y'•Cr ROUTE BACK TO ELECTRICAL PANEL \\ \ \ (2) 1• SCHD. 40 PVC DATA CONDUIT\ ROUTE BACK TO MSK ANAGERS DE, AND (1) L4- SCHD. 40 PVC CONDUIT ROUTE BACK TO ELECTRICAL PANEL CONCRETE FLOWLINE Ill' LONGCONCRETE PAVEMENT CENTERED ON E FLOWLINE SPEAKER POST LANDSCAPING CONCRETE DETECTOR LOOP CENTERED ON SPEAKER POST 7 BELOW FINAL GRADE B 0703 ASPHALT HC PARKING ONLY LIGHT SIGN -� POLE CONCRETE SIDEWALK DR'VL HRU IANC LIGHT \ POLE CONCRI[TE SIDEWALK DIRECTIONAL SIGN B NOT TO SCALE SCHD. 40 PVC CONDUIT BACK TO ELECTRICAL PANEL FLOWLINE CONCRETL \ 4, LANDSCAPING DRIVE AISLE ATO OSterling Design Associates, Ilc CIVIL ENGINEERS - W IDSCnPE MCHITECTS 7009 W. LIVE —&N NXo UW CO W170 317.79917210 N.n• AMI�De,01MOdaEan SIGNAGE FOR REFERENCE ONLY SME NG EIESIGN SSSOO MS I-- C15f6EE3EEV .. NO I OST. o9oTn3 Ev ETN OESCMEItlN tSrWiEE'vIMONE SNp NEYISEf9tfifr COIYFNiE NO ] WTE ttM/J013 Br M! OE.CY,vOON —m—co-3 No 3 WTE N —Rl— NO S DATE Br cescNlTmw . No aETKmvfgN . NO --TE g oEacNI1•rloN iOST E SCSIE sHs — TNIWECT u3Tuo9t pROrtET,IO OKK OKK m w�wN c u 01220-031 STARBUCKS DRIVE-THRU 12755 W 32ND AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY 2401 UTAH AVENUE SOUTH SEATTLE, WA 98134 SITE SIGNAGE PLAN 5 PANEL MENU BOARD-20DEG ORIENTATION & DIGITAL ORDER SCREEN, -- I PRE -MENU BOARD-30DEG ORIENTATION & CLEARANCE BAR SSE„— NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE D 6 OF 11 C701 4'.5 1rr FRONT ELEVATION DIGITAL C SCREEN' CANOPY. STARBUC EXPOSED FOOTING CURB STARBUCKS DRIVE-THRU - APPLEWOOD VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER PCD AMENDMENT #11 AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO SITUATED IN THE SE 1/4, NW 1/4, SECTION 29, T 3 S., R 69 W. OF THE 6TH P.M. CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONCRETE FOOTING. TYP ............... I IRIGHT ELEVATION NON -ILLUMINATED BOLLARD B NOT TO SCALE DIGITAL ORDER SCREEN HATH CANOPY (BY STARBUCKS) EXPOSED CONCRETE I I THIS DETAIL IS FOR REFERENCE FOOT) NCIII ONLY SIGNAGE SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY OTHERS UNDER FINISH GRADE SEPARATE PERMIT LEFT ELEVATION DIGITAL ORDER SCREEN WITH CANOPY A NOT TO SCALE -� EXPOSED CONCRETE REFLECTIVE TAPE w N H q Ji r'I w r+xY.ER DICK PER STARBUCKS STANDAR DS OKK + L ____ II I I _ _ _ J I II 5'dYIIC STEEL POST JIII ILL J L___J1I IIIL BOLTS (4 EACH)) PAINTED BLACK OR AS DIRECTED BY ^ I STARBUCKS CONSTRUCTION � r MANAGER CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY CURB CROWN FOR POSITIVE DRAINAGE I I I I I I I CANOPY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE L 'I I • 1' • I CONCRETE FOOTING ' L -J b ' "DIA NON -ILLUMINATED BOLLARD B NOT TO SCALE DIGITAL ORDER SCREEN HATH CANOPY (BY STARBUCKS) EXPOSED CONCRETE I I THIS DETAIL IS FOR REFERENCE FOOT) NCIII ONLY SIGNAGE SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY OTHERS UNDER FINISH GRADE SEPARATE PERMIT LEFT ELEVATION DIGITAL ORDER SCREEN WITH CANOPY A NOT TO SCALE -� EXPOSED CONCRETE WITH CANOPY w N H q Ji r'I w r+xY.ER DICK FDOTING OKK + L ____ II I I _ _ _ J I II 3M' DIAMETERANCHOR JIII ILL J L___J1I IIIL BOLTS (4 EACH)) I ( I � r CURB I I I I I I I I I CANOPY ABOVE I I I I L______J PLAN '1 III II I I I II II V DIGITAL ORDER SCREEN III II I if II III mul u n Inw WITH CANOPY w N H q Ji r'I w r+xY.ER DICK ka OKK + L ____ II I I _ _ _ J I II 3M' DIAMETERANCHOR JIII ILL J L___J1I IIIL BOLTS (4 EACH)) FINISHED GRADE 03 TIES (3 EACH) 11r PLATE, 3'X3 HEAVY HEX NUT 03 TIES. T a 10-0C 95 VERTICALS (6 EACH FOOTING) 55 VB' PLAN DIGITAL ORDER SCREEN FOOTING n STEEL BASE PLATE W/ OVAL HOLES FOR SWIVEUPOSITION ORDER SCREEN 0 Sterling Design Associates, Ilc CIVIL ENGINEERS � LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 1E09 W. LRJeIm R .-CO WIN, i0 w"C_101=4,u.<4Z7 «n pK ....rslnlO,Au SIGNAGE FOR REFERENCE ONLY SIERUNO DESIGN ASSOC'A�E 5. L.0 a REMAV+S xo WE OA.OI•tf Pr u+ OE¢RiRfgN u REu,gpx5,w0 REvi5FRW Crtv Cde�EN�S x0 I WE 11 1 Rr ua E PFA Crtv cawEw xo � GAiE e+ I WE NP I WE Br 01220-031 STARBUCKS DRIVE-THRU 12755 W 32ND AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY 2401 UTAH AVENUE SOUTH SEATTLE, VIA 98134 SIGNAGE DETAILS 8 OF 11 C703 WE 7125/16 NIAF r+xY.ER DICK ERD zC OKK + PR.WN�E,E 01220-031 STARBUCKS DRIVE-THRU 12755 W 32ND AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY 2401 UTAH AVENUE SOUTH SEATTLE, VIA 98134 SIGNAGE DETAILS 8 OF 11 C703 STARBUCKS DRIVE-THRU-APPLEWOOD VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER PCD AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO SITUATED IN THE SE 1/4, NW 1/4, SECTION 29 T 3 S, R 69 W. OF THE 6TH P M CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE. COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO ..gpprIFIi. nFvELOPMENT PLAN W�VATION 1 11.• • 1'17• SOUTH FACADE - 1.540 S.F. MATERIALS & TRANSPARENCY SUMMARY 2g . p• NO. MATERIAL % %OF FACADE j> BRK-1 BRIG( VENEER % NO. ANTERIAL STN -1 STONE VENEER 404% BRK-1 BRICK VENEER E-1 STUCCO 20.9% STN -1 STONE VENEER GLAZING 33% ,-SOUTH ELEVATION — 1M' • v -v 5 T_O. R_OOF_�. _ I IIT — I _ 2g . p• WEST FACADE - 873 S.F. j> MATERIALS & TRANSPARENCY SUMMARY 2(Y' 6" NO. ANTERIAL i %OFFACADE BRK-1 BRICK VENEER l7 % STN -1 STONE VENEER 37.8% E-1 STUCCO 17.5% T.O. HIGH PARAPET GLAZING 40% LOAMW PARA_PAET 18' 6" 8.0. CANOPY .O. FINISH FLOOR 0' ®O © © DED ED O ■_� ©�© - ° � ®:� �—_ �_ ;rb—mss• vlrr�: .re _ EO t YHWU D: 3 EO SHEET NOTES 1 ADDRESS SIGN 6 BLACK ANODIZED LETTERS WITH STAND-OFFS. BY GC 2 BUILDING SIGNAGE PER SCHEDULE SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS 3.60' LOGO SIGN PER SCHEDULE ON INTERIOR WALL. CENTERED ON GLASS SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS. 4 DRIVE-THRU SIGNAGE PER SCHEDULE. ALIGN RIGHT SIDE OF SIGN WITH EDGE OF WOROMARK SIGN ON SOUTH ELEVATION AS SHOWN. 5. EXTERIOR WALL SCONCE. ENSURE SCONCE IS CENTERED ON WALL. SEE DETAIL 71A -5W4 AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS 6 OUTDOOR SPEAKER PER SCHEDULE CENTER ON WALL OVER SCONCE. TYP 7. DOWNSPOUT FROM CANOPY PAINT TO MATCH CANOPY (MTL4) 8 KNOX BOX MOUNT ATV- T AFF. PAINT TO MATCH STONE VENEER (STN -1). 9. CEMENT PLASTER CONTROL JOINT. TYP. SEE DETAILS ON SHEET A-5005 I. HOSE 8188 AT 1'-0' SEE PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR MORE INFORMATION 11 DASHED LINE REPRESENTS OUTLINE OF ROOF MEMBRANE AND ROOF TOP UNITS BEHIND 12. PATIO RAILINGS. SEE DETAILS 6.7IA-5001 13. RESERVE WINDOW VINYL SIGNAGE 14. STEEL CHANNEL TO MATCH CANOPY. SEE DETAILS 10 & 11115. 15. STEEL CHANNEL TO TERMINATE AT WOOD PATIO ROOF BEAM. f 6. BOTTOM OF WOOD PATIO ROOF BEAM TO ALIGN WITH STEEL CHANNEL SEE STRUCTURAL. SEE SHEET A-1041 FOR FURTHER PATIO ROOF INFORMATION. EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE I _ I IIT — I _ O ROOF T.26' - 0" I 811 LT.O. HIGH PARAPET j> EO 2(Y' 6" T_0. LOW PARAPA _ B.O_CANOP 5-6" _FINISH FLOOR 0 1_ l � STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY 2401 UTAH AVENUE SOUTH SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98134 (206) 318-1575 THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE CONFIDENTIAL AND SMALL REMAIN THE SOLE PROPERTY OF STARBUCKS CORPORATION, WHICH IS THE OWNER OF THE COPYRIGHT IN THS WORK THEY SMALL NOT BE REPRODUCED (IN WHOLE OR IN PART), SHARED WITH THIRD PARTIES OR USED IN ANY MANNER ON OTHER PROJECTS OR EXTENSIONS TO THIS PROJECT WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF STARBUCKS CORPORATION. ARCHITECT OF RECORD R'Frolholt . Ho 1 architects RAYblon SeMCWA n f W C+D WLL M O zCo Z j0 Z QU p O , O Lu rJ u >- MO N z W O Z W p w z w Ln W LL LL a M a �4 z�: LLI STORE #: 251 PROJECT #: 01220-031 CONCEPT: PALETTE: ISSUE DATE- 17 MARCH 2015 DESIGN MANAGER: MELISSA BODWAY LEEO®AP. PRODUCTION DESIGNER. CHECKED BY SHEET TITLE BUILDING ELEVATIONS SGnIE � SnEE' N.i MEE9 A-2001 9 OF 11 f Q m N C r,--\EAISTIELEVATION 2 NORTH ELEVATION STARBUCKS DRIVE-THRU-APPLEWOOD VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER PCD AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO SITUATED IN THE SE 1/4, NW 1/4, SECTION 29, T 3 S, R 69 W. OF THE 6TH P.M. CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN _ T.O. HIGH PARAPET za - e• T.O. LOW PARAPA 18'-8` B.O. CANOPY T.O. FINISH FLOOR Cr U EAST FACADE - 770 S.F. MATERIALS & TRANSPARENCY SUMMARY MD. MATERIAL %OF FACADE LK -1 BRICK VENEER 13 % STM; , STONE VENEER 418% E-1 STUCCO 36% GLAZING 2% SHEET NOTES 1 ADDRESS SIGN 8' BLACK ANODIZED LETTERS WITH STAND-OFFS, BY GC 2. BUILDING SIGNAGE PER SCHEDULE SEE ELECTRICAL ORAWINGS 3 SCUPPER PAINT TO MATCH CANOPY (MTLJ) 4. DRrVE-THRU SIGNAGE PER SCHEDULE. ALIGN RIGHT SIDE OF SIGN WITH EDGE OF WOROMARK SIGN ON SOUTH ELEVATION AS SHOWN. 5. EXTERIOR WALL SCONCE ENSURE SCONCE IS CENTERED ON WALL SEE DETAIL 71XS004 AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS. 6 OUTDOOR SPEAKER PER SCHEDULE CENTER ON WALL OVER SCONCE, TYP 7 DOWNSPOUT FROM CANOPY PAINT TO MATCH CANOPY (MTL4) B. KNOX BOX. MOUNT AT 5'd AFF. PAINT TO MATCH STONE VENEER (STN -1) 9. CEMENT PLASTER CONTRL JOINT, TVP. SEE DETAILS ON SHEET A- 5005 10, HOSE BIBB AT 1'-0-, SEE PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR MORE INFORMATION 11. DASHED LINE REPRESENTS OUTLINE OF ROOF MEMBRANE AND ROOF TOP UNITS BEHIND. 12. PATIO RAILINGS. SEE DETAILS 6-71A-5001 13. RESERVE WINDOW VINYL SIGNAGE 14. MANUFACTURED METAL SCREEN ON STANDOFFS WITH INTEGRATED LIGHTING 15. DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE 16. BOLLARD. 17 STEEL CHANNEL TO MATCH CANOPY SEE DETAILS 10 11 11A-1103 18. BOTTOM OF WOOD PATIO ROOF SEAM TO ALIGN WTH STEEL CHANNEL. SEE STRUCTURAL EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE I WC.) —I — — — T.O. ROOF. 5 26 - 0" I TO. HIGH PARAPET A Z 0 � 20 e --T-—- Q T.O. LOW PARAPAET 16A I I B.O. CANOPY 5-6`� STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY 2401 UTAH AVENUE SOUTH SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98134 SHALL REMAIN THE WHK:H 15 THE OWNER OF THE COPYRIGHT IN THIS WORK. THEY SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED (IN WHOLE OR IN PART), SHARED WITH THIRD PARTIES OR USED IN ANY MANNER ON OTHER PROJECTS OR EXTENSIONS TO THIS PROJECT WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF STARBUCKS CORPORATION. ARCHITECT OF RECORD rlFreiheith architects ro.aw ra sure>m R.ft,- SCN40Y4. 9 Wr2 WC.) LL 5 U Z$ Z 0 � Q O o LU N O Lh Z O o U g §I.- U LnLf) Q x W ILLJjJJ NfLL N 9 W STORE M: 251 PROJECT* 01220-031 CONCEPT PALETTE: ISSUE DATE-. 17 MARCH 2015 DESIGN MANAGER MELISSABODWAY LEED®AP PRODUCTION DESIGNER. CHECKED BY. SHEET TITLE. BUILDING ELEVATIONS SCALE ff SHEET NUMBER A-2002 10 OF 11 STARBUCKS DRIVE-THRU-APPLEWOOD VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER PCD AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO SITUATED IN THE SE 1/4, NW 1/4, SECTION 29, T 3 S: R 69 W OF THE 6TH P.M. CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXTERIOR 3D VIEW 1 sw STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY 2401 UTAH AVENUE SOUTH SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98134 (206) 318-1575 CONFIDENTIAL AND SHALL REMAIN THE SOLE PROPERTY OF STARBUCKS CORPORATION. WHICH IS THE OWNER OF THE COPYRIGHT IN THIS WORK. THEY SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED (IN WHOLE OR IN PART). SHARED WITH THIRD PARTIES OR USED IN ANY MANNER ON OTHER PROJECTS OR EXTENSIONS TO THIS PROJECT WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF STARSUCKS CORPORATION ARCHITECT OF RECORD rilroihoit & Ho architects I Revision SCMEUk J W W M LL_ D �O>- OF Z 00 1.- QO � p O o w (� }o M� O F Ir -0 v LnQ w w Z w LO LLJ LL C M a STORE #. 251 PROJECT #. 01220-031 CONCEPT PALETTE ISSUE DATE. 17 MARCH 1015 DESIGN MANAGER. MELISSA BODWAY LEEDOAP PRODUCTION DESIGNER CHECKED BY SHEET TITLE AERIAL PERSPECTIVE SCALE SHEET NUMBER A-1000 11 OF 11 EXHIBIT 6 - SDP DOCUMENT A EXHIBIT 7 - APPLICANT'S RESPONSE TO VARIANCE CRITERIA �c Sterling Design Associates, Ilc Variance Request Letter Date August 7 2015 Tc Meredith Reckert. Senior Planner City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Department 7500 W. 29th Ave 2nd Floor Wheat Ridge. CO 80033 From. Owen Keenan. PE — Sterling Design Associates RE: Variance Request for the Youngfield Street Build -to Line Starbucks Drive-Thru at Applewood Village Shopping Center PCD 12755 W. 3I^6 Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 This letter is to serve as a formal request for a 10 -foot administrative variance to the Youngfield Street build -to line on behalf of Regency Centers. L.P for the development of a Starbucks cafe with drive-thru, The site as designed only requires an 8.2 -foot variance to the buil!-to line however, up to a 10 -foot variance can be granted administratively and would allow for adequate building placement within the variance It is the intent of Regency Centers. L P and Starbucks Coffee Company to redevelop a portion of the southwest corner of the Applewood Village Shopping Center into a 2.500 square foot Starbucks Cale with drive thru and associated parking The City has allowed a drive-thru facility to be located on site through a Special Use Permit (Case No. SUP -13.00 The approval of the Special Use Permit also included an administrative 10 -foot variance to the 20 -foot build -to line for the site that is located in the Contemporary Overlay Area within the City of Wheat Ridge. Regency Centers had acquired the property with this 10 -foot variance in place. The original variance (Case No WA -13-18) was granted on December 13, 2013 and has since expired The site property has been subject to nurne, ous Right -of -Way dedications along W. 32 Avenue and Youngfield Street due to the recent intersection improvements Approximately 30- feet of the original south property line has been dedicated as W, 32d Avenue Right -of -Way. In addition, 10 -feet of the original west property line has been dedicated as Youngfield Street Right -of -Way. it is anticipated that an additional 2 -feet and 6 -feet will be dedicated at a future date along W 32,,d Avenue and Youngfield Street, respectively. The narrow site dictates an east -west onentation of the building with the drive-thru lane on the north side A two-way drive aisle is preferred along the west side of the budding to improve the overall traffic circulation of the site by eliminating" dead end" parking as well as allowing access to alternative site exits for all site patrons The variance is requested to accommodate the two- way drive aisle along the western porton of the budding Jay M. Newell, PE Wayne T. Sterling, RLA, LEED AP 2009 W Lmb[m bbd 8100 L[[k[onCO 60120 303 794 7727 ph ww keAn�eutnAstoruus cnn Sterling Design Associates, IIC Listed below is the City of Wheat Ridge variance review criteria as contained in Section 26-115 of the municipal code as well as responses on behalf of Regency Centers. L,P and Starbucks Coffee Company. A The property to question would not yield a reasonable return to use, service or income if permitted to be used only under conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located. Response: The site could be developed without the variance; however, the variance will allow for increased traffic circulation to accomfnod ate all patrons of the Starbucks site. The site is constrained by ingress and egress points and without the variance, the overall site circulation would be significantly diminished and may discourage use due to the difficulty of entering and the limited options of exiting the site, The variance will allow for increased traffic circulation around the proposed building that would provide two main features increasing traffic circulation: I.) The "dead-end" parking area would be eliminated by the two- way travel lane around the building connecting to the right -out onto Youngfield Street. 2.) Drive-thru patrons would be offered connectivity to the site's exit onto W. 32•," Avenue and the Applewood Shopping Center to the north. B. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: In a past variance approval (Case No. WA -13.18), the City has acknowledged that the proposed building setback will be consistent with the existing building locations to the north and south of the development. C. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property with this application, which would not be possible without the variance. Response: The applicant is proposing improvements associated with the development of a Starbucks Cafe with Drive-Thru. The site is currently underutilized as vacant land. Due to past and future Right -of -Way dedications, the site is constrained by the shape of the site as well as design standards within the Contemporary Overlay arca. Without the variance, a drive-thru will not be best suited for the site. Additional circulation around the building is desired by both Regency Centers and Starbucks that offers patrons interconnectivity to additional ingresslegress points as well eliminating "dead-end" parking. Jay M. Nrwell, PE Wayne T. Sterling, RLA. LEED AP 20" w. LKtleton bbd n300 Lrtdeton CO $0110 M 7944717 ph www ke+ImtthsitnAssonates com �c Sterling Design Associates, Ilc O. The particular physical surrounding shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved results in a particular or unique hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience 0 the strict letter of the regulations were carried out. Response: Due to past and future Right -of -Way dedications, the site is constrained by the rectangular shape of the property and especially the shallow north -south depth and will face development challenges. The site is also faced with limited ingress and egress points with restricted turning movements. Although the site could be developed without the variance, it would result in the site being underutilized and therefore a poor investment. The alleged drfitculty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having interest in the property Response: The hardship was created by constraining the site with past and future Right -of -Way dedications resulting in reduced site area and limiting the ingress and egress points of the site. Providing patrons with the Appropriate on-site traffic circulation creates a situation in which there in an inability to meet the 20 -foot build -to line requirement contained in the Architectural and Site Design Manual. The granting of the variance would rat be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements to the neighborhood in which the property is located, by, among other things, substantially or permanently impairing the appropriate use or development of adjacent property. impairing the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or substantially diminishing or impairing property values within the neighborhood. Response: In a past variance approval of the subject property (Case No. WA -13-I8). the City has acknowledged that the variance will not have a detrimental effect upon the general public health, welfare and safety of the surrounding areas. Granting the variance will not permanently impair the development of adjacent property or impair the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property. With the variance, the existing building to the north would have approximately the same setback distance as the proposed building. Granting the variance will have a positive effect on property values, and the aesthetics of the property will be greatly improved. G. The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are present in the neighborhood and are not unique to the property. Response: Existing buildings located on properties to the north and south of the site appear to be consistent with a 30 -foot building setback off of Youngfield Street. Jay M. Newell, PE Wayne T. Sterling, RLA, LEED AP 2004 w tmbton Btvd. N300 LKd tan. CO 90 120 303 794 4727 0 www SterbntC*sipAssodates com e Sterling Design Associates, Ile H Granting of rhe variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities Response: Granting of the variance would not affect persons with disabilities. This item is not applicable. I. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual. Response: The proposed Starbucks site is consistent with the Architectural and Site Design Manual. An alternate site design complying with the 0 to 20 feet build -to line along Youngfield Street would sacrifice on-site traffic circulation and severely hinder the serviceability of the site to Starbucks patrons. Poor traffic circulation and limited points of ingress and egress could discourage use. Due to the narrow north -south configuration of the site, the only option to increase traffic circulation is to route two-way traffic around the building adjacent to Youngfield Street. This improvement to circulation necessitates the need for the variance It is Regency Centers and Starbucks desire to eliminate the "dead end" parking while providing drive-thru users access to additional points of egress. Should addimnal information be required, please feel free to contact me directly at 303-794- 4727 ext. 206. Sincerely, Owen Keenan. PE Civil Engineer Sterling Design Associates Jay M. Newell, PE Wayne T. Sterling, RLA, LEES AP 2009 w Lakron ei,d =3va Lialeron CO 80120 303 794.4727 pti +..� Ster{nlD�sgnAssotistas fom City of W heat judge LETTER NOTICE CERTIFICATION (as required pursuant to Code Section 26-109.D) Case No.: WZ-15-02 & WA -15-09 Date of Planning Commission hearing: December 3, 2015 I Tammy Odean, Administrative Assistant, Community Development Department, hereby certify that I mailed a total of 9 letters on November 19. 2015 to the attached recipient list at least 15 days prior to a scheduled public hearing. Signature: —� Date: /I / q - /-5- City of "� Wheat_dge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29" Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 LETTER NOTICE (As required pursuant to Code Section 26-109.D) November 19, 2015 Dear Property Owner: This is to inform you of Case No. WZ-15-02 and Case No. WA -15-09, an application filed by Regency Centers L.P. for approval of a Specific Development Plan for a Starbucks Cafe with a drive-through, with a variance to the build -to line for property located at 3210 Youngfield Street & 12755 W. 32°d Avenue. This request is scheduled for public hearing in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue. The schedule is as follows: PlanninE Commission December 3 2015 (aD 7.00 p.m. As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at 303-235-2846. Thank you, City of Wheat Ridge Planning Division Individuals with disabilities are encouraged to participate in all public meetings sponsored by the City of Wheat Ridge. If you need inclusion assistance, please call Heather Geyer, Public Information Officer at 303-235-2826 at least one week in advance of a meeting. iN"iN.ci.« heatridge.co.us Vicinity Map WZ 1502 & WA I 509.doc A FAII FIRSTBANK OF WHEAT RIDGE LIN JINNY NORGARD PEARL L 12345 W COLFAX AVE 3175 XENON ST 3180 XENON ST LAKEWOOD CO 80215 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80215 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80215 S&JLLC 12600 W 32ND AVE WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 SAGE ARON SAGE SANDRA 3185 XENON ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80215 SWA WHEAT RIDGE LLC 25700 SCIENCE PARK DR BEACHWOOD OH 44122 WELLS FARGO BANK WEST NA WINTON DONALD K U S RETAIL PARTNERS LLC % THOMPSON PROPERTY TAX 12590 W 32ND AVE PO BOX 790830 SERVICES WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 SAN ANTONIO TX 78279 PO BOX 2609 CARLSBAD CA 92018 City of Wheat P,,*,iidgc POSTING CERTIFICATION CASE NO. PLANNING COMI,S N / CITY COUNCIL / BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (Circle One HEARING DATE: I, residing at as the applicant for Case No Public Hearing at 12 (name) (address) e -/S`-C'J , hereby certify that I have posted the Notice of (location) on this day of-- &&- , 29-Z6—, and do hereby certify that said sign has been posted and remained in place for fifteen (15) days prior to and including the scheduled day of public hearing of this case. The sign was posted in the position shown on the map below. Signature: 2 NOTE: This form must be submitted at the public hearing on this case and will be placed in the applicant's case file at the Community Development Department. 5�6.✓s City of Wheat i ge PUBLIC HEARING POSTING REQUIREMENTS Applicants are required to post a NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING before all Board of Adjustment, Planning Commission and City Council meetings. Signs will be provided by the Community Development Department. One sign must be posted per street frontage. In addition, the following requirements must be met: ■ The sign must be located within the property boundaries. • The sign must be securely mounted on a flat surface. • The sign must be elevated a minimum of thirty (30) inches from ground. ■ The sign must be visible from the street without obstruction. • The sign must be legible and posted for fifteen (15) continuous days prior to and including the day of public hearing. It is the applicant's responsibility to certify that these requirements have been met and to submit a completed Posting Certification Form at the public hearing. 0<�> Sterling Design Associates, Ilc �IVIL ENv NEERS - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Date: 11/10/2015 "!!I To: Meredith Reckert, AICP, Senior Planner From: Mike Haaf, RLA RE: Starbucks — 12755 W 32nd Avenue — Specific Development Plan Second Round Formal Comment Responses Dear Ms. Reckert, Please find enclosed a revised Specific Development Plan submittal package for the proposed Starbucks at 12755 W. 32�d Avenue. Our formal responses to the 2nd Round Comments are included below in bold. SHEET ONE In the first line of the title, indicate that this is Amendment #11. This should be reflected on all of the sheets. "Amendment #11" has been added to the first line of the title on all sheets as requested. 2. Add the following number to the case history box: WA -15-09 "WA -15-09" has been added to the case history box. 3. In the character of the Development statement, add the following language: The property is within the "Contemporary Overlay District" which requires a 0'-20' build -to line where buildings are adjacent to public streets. Included in this request are variances to the required build -to line from both West 32nd Avenue and Youngfield Street. The requested language has been added to the Character of the Development statement. 4. In the note under the site data table, be aware that the Outline Development Plan for the shopping center has not yet been recorded but will be prior to the case advancing to public hearing. Please leave a blank so the reception number of the ODP for the shopping center recording can be added in. A blank line for the reception number has been added to the note as requested. Jay M. Newell, PE Wayne T. Sterling, RLA, LEED AP 2009 W. Littleton Blvd. #300 Littleton, CO 80120 303.794.4727 ph www.SterlingDesignAssociates.com Kimley>>> Horn Page 2 Review Comment: Page 18 — The percentage of pass -by trips for the Fuel Center should be stated in the study, not just the response letter. Applicant's Response: Understood, these values have been added to the revised traffic study. Trip Distribution Review Comment: Page 19 — Discussion should be included in this section concerning the potential shift in traffic exiting the Shopping Center from Youngfield Street to 3211d Avenue because of the Fuel Center. Additional figures should be added to illustrate the changes in the trip distribution. The following should be incorporated in that discussion: a. Most, if not all, of the internal capture trips for the Fuel Center related to the King Soopers will likely visit the Fuel Center after shopping. b. Because of the difficulties in navigating the high pedestrian traffic areas in front of either the King Soopers or Applejacks entrances, the majority of those internal capture trips will likely use the 32nd main access to exit the site. Applicant's Response: A redistribution of existing traffic has been applied within the revised traffic study. This has been illustrated in a new figure as requested. The discussion of existing traffic rerouting to the 32 Avenue access from Youngfield Street is also being applied. Review Comment: Page 20 — On Figure 9 the following adjustments should be made: a. It seemsunlikelythat traffic from Applewood Village would exit left onto Youngfield, then left onto 32 , then left at the alley access to get to the Starbucks. That 5% could be added to internal capture using the new Chilis connection. b. Since the alley access will not allow a SB left turn, those trips should be assigned to the 32nd main access SB left turns. Applicant's Response. Now that an internal connection is available between Starbucks and the rest of the Applewood Village Center, these distribution adjustments have been applied. Review Comment: Pages 24 and 25 — The trips shown on Figures 13 and 14 will need to be adjusted to reflect the changes to Figure 9. Applicant's Response: Understood, these adjustments have been reflected in the revised traffic study. Review Comment: Pages 30 thru 33 — The trips shown on Figures 19 thru 22 will need to be adjusted to reflect the changes to Figure 9 and any impact of the shift of the internal capture trips to the 32nd main access. Applicant's Response: Understood. these adjustments have been reflected in the revised traffic study. Key Intersection Operational Analysis Review Comment: Page 35 — The signal timing for the 32nd Avenue and Youngfield Street intersection was recently changed, the timing plan can be provided. Please revise the study to reflect the new timing. The study still mentions that the timing was optimized, the actual timing needs to be used. Applicant's Response: The new existing timing for the 32nd Avenue and Youngfield Street intersection was requested from the City of Wheat Ridge. Unfortunately, it wasn't provided in time to meet the deadline submittal of the revised traffic study for the upcoming Planning Commission meeting. Therefore, the previous existing timing was used, unmodified. The intersection timing adjustments would be thought to be minimal and wouldn't result in a significant change to the level of service. This can be verified once the new signal timings are provided. The existing timings were used for all near term analyses. For 2035, due to the change in traffic volumes at the 32nd Avenue/Youngfield Street intersection with the Interstate 70 interchange 303 228 2300 Sterling Design Associates, Ilc UVIL ENGINEERS - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS SHEET TWO The dumpster enclosure should be made of brick, not CMU. The detail of the dumpster enclosure has been revised to specify a brick veneer. SHEETS TWO, THREE, FIVE 1. The order board and order station should be labelled the same on all of the sheets that show the site plan. The drive-thru order point is now labelled consistently on all of the sheets that show the site plan. As noted previously, Staff does not support the variance to the build -to line along Youngfield accommodating two-way traffic on the west side of the building for a variety of reasons. Those include the exception that has already been granted for the build -to along 32nd Avenue and potential conflicting turning movements between the drive through exit and traffic going north to exit the site onto Youngfield. If this design is still requested by the applicant, this can discussed at the Planning Commission public hearing. Left hand turns will not be allowed from the 32nd Avenue access in accordance with Public Works' comments dated September 29, 2015. See attached. The island preventing left-hand turns can be mountable for delivery truck access. The request for a variance to the build -to line along Youngfield accommodating two-way traffic on the west side of the building remains for discussion at the public hearing. Justification for the request is for the following reasons: Jay M. Newell, PE Wayne T. Sterling, RLA, LEED AP 2009 W. Littleton Blvd. #300 Littleton, CO 80120 303.794.4727 ph www. Sterl i nADesignAssociates.com Sterling Design Associates, Ilc CIVIL LNUNEERS - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS A 61 i; a !� e I- I �92 I I e 'E- •^ • —.. ••• Y •• . �- SAA®LE BANK SITE STUDY �. - .... WAVIE DRIVE-THRU RMAURANT SITE sTBDY S C.7 EAT R IVG ST aM 12)55 w. 72nD AVE. '��' �"'�' -'' A = - CONCEPT SITE PLANS NMEAT RIDGE. E.COCOLORADO REGENCY CENTERS —� a. A similar site plan was previously approved in 2013 matching our build -to line. STARRUCILS DRIVUTHRU - APPIEWOOD VILLAGE SHOPPM CENTER PCD AM84DMENT YI I AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PIAN W THE 'K ._ OF VNIFAT RIDGE COLORADO ano o�Q'TYacm�oo� SPECIFIC DEVELOPMBtlT PLAN I 1 llQO O �i -- I Erg b. The proposed building aligns with the existing Chili's building to the north. Jay M. Newell, PE Wayne T. Sterling, RLA, LEED AP 2009 W. Littleton Blvd. #300 Littleton, CO 80120 303.794.4727 ph www.SterlingDesignAssociates.com Kimley>>> Horn Page 3 improvements, the analysis was run with both the existing timing and optimized timing for evaluation by the City. Review Comment: Page 35 — The LOS for the individual movements for the 32nd & Youngfield intersection should also be included in Table 3. Applicant's Response: Movement LOS has been added to the table as requested. Review Comment: Page 36— The 2nd paragraph discusses the need to continue to have the 32nd alley access be a full movement access to serve the Starbucks, which will not be allowed due to the significant safety issues created. Left turning movements will not be allowed because of the close proximity to the 32nd main access EB left turn lane and the 32nd & Youngfield WB left turn lanes. This traffic would be better served by the Chilis connection to a new traffic signal at the 32nd main access. The alley access needs to be constructed as a right-in/right-out. The island could be mountable to allow trucks to still use this access as a full movement. Applicant's Response: It is understood now that the plan is to restrict the existing 32"" Avenue full movement alley access to right-in/right-out movements only by the construction of a mountable curb median in the driveway throat. This mountable curb island will be constructed such that it will restrict the public passenger car movements to right-in/right-out while allowing the delivery vehicles to access the alley per the movements needed and desired. The traffic study has been revised based on this change in access. Review Comment: Page 36 — The 2nd paragraph also mentions having two outbound lanes for the alley access. As discussed above, the SB left -out movement will not be allowed. Applicant's Response: Understood. Review Comment: Page 38 — The 1" and 2nd paragraphs anticipate a future signal, this signal needs to be done with this redevelopment of the fuel center. Applicant's Response: It is understood that this intersection will be signalized in the near future, as it is warranted based on existing traffic. The design for the traffic signal has been started. Review Comment: Page 40 — This section discusses this access being a right-in/right-out; however, as it is currently built, it allows left turns. The access should be reconstructed to restrict left- turning movements. Applicant's Response: Understood, recommendations have been added to the revised traffic study pertaining to this access. Review Comment: Page 41 — This section discusses this access being a right-in/right-out; however, as it is currently built, it allows left turns. The access should be reconstructed to restrict left- turning movements. Applicants Response: Understood, recommendations have been added to the revised traffic study pertaining to this access. Review Comment: Page 42 — The LOS for the individual movements for the Youngfield signalized access should also be included in Table 8. Applicant's Response: Movement LOS has been added to this table as requested 303 228 2300 Kimley>>> Horn Page 4 Intersection Queuing Analysis Review Comment: Page 44 — The following changes should be made to Table 10: c. The queues for the through movements at all of the intersections should be included. d. The existing lane length for the WB thru/right movement at the Youngfield signalized access should be included. Applicant's Response: Through movement queues, as well as the westbound through/right turn queue at the 32nd Avenue/Youngfield Street signalized intersection has been added to the table as requested. Review Comment: Page 45 — The 2nd paragraph discusses the design for an EB left turn lane for the alley access. The WB left turn lanes cannot be shortened. The 32nd & Youngfield intersection has been designed to accommodate large amounts of additional traffic from the development site west of 1-70 and the eventual relocation of the EB 1-70 ramps to the south. Applicant's Response: Understood. This text has been modified. Conclusions and Recommendations Review Comment: Several of the conclusions and recommendations will need to be revised to reflect the comments made elsewhere in this memo. Applicant's Response: The Conclusions and Recommendations Section has been revised. Appendix D — Intersection Analysis Worksheets Review Comment: As noted previously, the timing for the traffic signal at 32"d & Youngfield was revised recently. The actual timing for the signal should be obtained from the City and used for the modeling. Applicant's Response: Previous existing timings were used in the analysis, unmodified (please see previous response). Appendix E — Queuing Analysis Worksheets Review Comment: The queues for several turning movements at the 32"d & Youngfield intersection show that they exceed the available capacity. This appears to be in error. Applicant's Response: These were checked within the revised traffic study. Review Comment: The WB right at the 32"1 & Youngfield intersection appears to be the longest queue for the weekday pm. This needs to be shown on Table 10. Applicant's Response: This has been shown in the revised traffic study as requested. Please contact me at (303) 228-2304 or Curtis. RoweCci) kim ley- horn.com should you have any questions or require anything further. Sincerely, KIM EY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. A4� urtis D. Rowe, P.E., PTOE Vice President Chapter 3 - Site Design C Sterling Design Associates, Ilc U1 il_ Etvi,iNEERS - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 3.2 Building Entrance Placement \ Design Principle: Building entrances should be oriented toward the street to create convenient pedestrian access and encourage Jf an active, attractive streetscape. Building Entry Placement. Building entrances oriented to the street create a pedestrian -friend environment. ! r . ! (716% ; ,2' I-- -------------- PRIMARY STREET FRONTAGE = 0-12Build-To Area - - = Property Lines Figure 3.1 - Build -To For Traditional Overlay. At least 60% of the property's frontage on the primary street must contain a building within the required 0-12 foot build -to area. Design Stan 1. Traditional Overlay: each building shall have at least one main public entrance that faces an adjacent street or public open space. For corner lots with more than one frontage, the entry may be oriented toward the corner. Design Guidelines: Ar., ontemporary and Suburban Overlay: each building is ncouraged to ha lic entrance that face�an street or public open space. 3.3 Building Placement: Build -To Areas Design Principle: Buildings should be placed close to the street to promote an interesting and pedestrian -friendly street environment. Build -to areas establish a zone close to the front property line within which a building should be located. The build -to requirements shall not preclude the ability to access parking to the side or rear of Design Stan 1. Traditional Overlay: a 0-12 foot build -to area shall apply to 60% of the primary street frontage. This means that at least 60% of the property's frontage along the primary street must be occupied by buildings within the 0-12 foot build -to area (see Table 3.1 and Figure 3.1). - For sites with more than one building, the build - to requirement may be fulfilled by one building or multiple buildings. Not every building is required to be in the build -to area as long as at least one structure meets the build -to requirements. - For corner lots with more than one street frontage, the primary street frontage may be reduced to 50% if at least 25% the secondary street frontage is occupied by buildings within the 0-12 feet build -to zone (see Figure 3.2). - Within the 60% primary street frontage where the build -to applies, any area between the building facade and the property line shall be reserved for pedestrian activity, outdoor seating, plazas, and/or landscaping. 2. Contemporary Overlay: a 0-20 foot build -to area shall apply to 40% of the primary street frontage. This means that at least 40% of the property's frontage along the primary street must be occupied by buildings within the 0-20 foot build -to area 12 Wheat Ridge Architectural and Site Design Manual Jay M. Newell, PE Wayne T. Sterling, RLA, LEED AP 2009 W. Littleton Blvd. #300 Littleton, CO 80120 303.794.4727 ph www.SterlingDesignAssociates.com Sterling Design Associates, Ilc ,_ry I L LNNtEit�) - LANUSLAPE AKCHITECTS c. Consistent with Section 3.2 of the Architectural and Site Design Manual, a structural outdoor seating area located at the Youngfield Street frontage encourages an active, attractive streetscape. d. Two-way traffic on the west side of the building will allow all customers to circulate within the site and will eliminate dead-end parking. e. Vehicles circulating from the drive-thru to the south side of the store will not be an issue due to the provided stop sign and the metered release from the drive-thru. A mountable island has been added at the alley on 32nd Avenue to prevent left- hand turns. Traffic Impact Study Comments from Mark Westberg The Traffic Impact Study Comments have been addressed separately by Kimley-Horn. The current Starbucks site layout reflects the overall layout being proposed in the revised Traffic Impact Study. Comment responses and revised Traffic Impact Study are attached and included in this SDP submittal package. City of Wheat Ridge Public Works Comments Public Works approved the Drainage and Construction Plans with the request for a SWMP Report, as our site area disturbance now exceeds one acre. The report has been submitted and is currently under review. Revisions are shown on the project plan drawings. One 24"x36" hardcopy, one 11"x17" hardcopy, one .pdf set, and one .dwg site file (version 2010, and including all reference files) of the revised drawings are included for this resubmittal. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please feel free to contact me via email at mike@sterlingdesignassociates.com or via phone at 303.794.4727 ex. 210. Thank you. Mike Haaf, RLA Sterling Design Associates, LLC Civil Engineers — Landscape Architects Jay M. Newell, PE Wayne T. Sterling, RLA, LEED AP 2009 W. Littleton Blvd. #300 Littleton, CO 80120 303.794.4727 ph www.SterlingDesignAssociates.com City of Wheat jdge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29"' Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 October 1, 2015 Eric Chekal Regency Centers 8480 East Orchard Road Suite 6900 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 Dear Mr. Chekal: This letter is in regard to a the second submittal for approval of a Specific Development Plan for property zoned Planned Commercial Development (PCD) located at 12755 W. 32"d Avenue. The second submittal has been reviewed and the following are comments regarding the first submittal. SHEET ONE 1. In the first line of the title, indicate that this is Amendment #11. This should be reflected on all of the sheets. 2. Add the following number to the case history box: WA -15-09. 3. In the character of the Development statement, add the following language: The property is within the "Contemporary Overlay District" which requires a 0' — 20' build -to line where buildings are adjacent to public streets. Included in this request are variances to the required build -to line from both West 32nd Avenue and Youngfield Street. 4. In the note under the site data table, be aware that the Outline Development Plan for the shopping center has not yet be recorded but will be prior to the case advancing to public hearing. Please leave a blank so the reception number of the ODP for the shopping center recording can be added in. SHEET TWO I . The dumpster enclosure should be made of brick, not CMU. SHEETS TWO, THREE, FIVE 1. The order board and order station should be labelled the same on all of the sheets that show the site plan. 2. As noted previously, Staff does not support the variance to the build -to line along Youngfield accommodating two-way traffic on the west side of the building for a variety of reasons. Those include the exception that has already been granted for the build -to along 32"d Avenue and potential conflicting turning movements between the drive-through exit and traffic going north to exit the site onto Youngfield. If this design is still requested by the applicant, this can discussed at the Planning Commission public hearing. 3. Left hand turns will not be allowed from the 32"d Avenue access in accordance with Public Works' comments dated September 29, 2015. See attached. The island preventing left-hand turns can be mountable for delivery truck access. Once changes have been made, please submit one 24" x 36" copy and one 11" x 14" copy of the revised documents. Include an electronic copy with a PDF document and an AutoCAD dwg (2010 or older) including all external reference and shx files, etc. Include in the submittal appurtenant technical documents. If you have any questions or need further clarification, do not hesitate to contact me at 303-235-2848. Sincerely, A< Meredith Reckert, AICP Senior Planner City of 0 W heat Rjidge TUBI IC WORKS Memorandum TO: Meredith Reckert, AICP, Senior Planner FROM: Mark Westberg, PE, CFM, Project Supervisor DATE: September 29, 2015 SUBJECT: Applewood Village Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study — August 2015 — 2nd Review I have completed my review of the Traffic Impact Study dated August 2015 for the proposed redevelopment of Applewood Village at the northeast corner of 32"d Avenue and Youngfield Street. I have the following comments regarding this submittal: 1. Executive Summary — The executive summary will need to be revised to reflect the comments made elsewhere in this memo. In particular the restriction of the alley access to a right-in/right-out. 2. Unspecified Development Traffic Growth — For most of the intersections, a growth rate from the DRCOG should be used to determine the 2035 traffic volume. However, for the intersection of 32nd Avenue and Youngfield Street the results from FONSI for the Cabelas development should also be evaluated. The FONSI includes the relocation of the EB I-70 ramps to 20`h Avenue. This will have a dramatic impact on the WB turning movements at 32"d Avenue and Youngfield Street. 3. Trip Generation a. Page 17 — The site plan shows a connection with Chilis, so the internal capture for Starbucks can now come from within the Shopping Center. The percentage may need to be reevaluated now that there is a direct connection. b. Page 18 — The percentage of pass -by trips for the Fuel Center should be stated in the study, not just the response letter. 4. Trip Distribution a. Page 19 — Discussion should be included in this section concerning the potential shift in traffic exiting the Shopping Center from Youngfield Street to 32"d Avenue because of the Fuel Center. Additional figures should be added to illustrate the changes in the trip distribution. The following should be incorporated in that discussion: i. Most, if not all, of the internal capture trips for the Fuel Center related to the King Soopers will likely visit the Fuel Center after shopping. ii. Because of the difficulties in navigating the high pedestrian traffic areas in front of either the King Soopers or Applejacks entrances, the majority of those internal capture trips will likely use the 32nd main access to exit the site. b. Page 20 — On Figure 9 the following adjustments should be made: i. It seems unlikely that traffic from Applewood Village would exit left onto Youngfield, then left onto 32"d, then left at the alley access to get to the Applewood Traffic Study September 29, 2015 Page 2 Starbucks. That 5% could be added to internal capture using the new Chilis connection. ii. Since the alley access will not allow a SB left turn, those trips should be assigned to the 32"d main access SB left turns. c. Pages 24 and 25 — The trips shown on Figures 13 and 14 will need to be adjusted to reflect the changes to Figure 9. d. Pages 30 thru 33 — The trips shown on Figures 19 thru 22 will need to be adjusted to reflect the changes to Figure 9 and any impact of the shift of the internal capture trips to the 32"d main access. 5. Key Intersection Operational Analysis a. Page 35 — The signal timing for the 32nd Avenue and Youngfield Street intersection was recently changed, the timing plan can be provided. Please revise the study to reflect the new timing. The study still mentions that the timing was optimized, the actual timing needs to be used. b. Page 35 — The LOS for the individual movements for the 32"d & Youngfield intersection should also be included in Table 3. c. Page 36— The 2"d paragraph discusses the need to continue to have the 32nd alley access be a full movement access to serve the Starbucks, which will not be allowed due to the significant safety issues created. Left turning movements will not be allowed because of the close proximity to the 32nd main access EB left turn lane and the 32nd & Youngfield WB left turn lanes. This traffic would be better served by the Chilis connection to a new traffic signal at the 32nd main access. The alley access needs to be constructed as a right-in/right-out. The island could be mountable to allow trucks to still use this access as a full movement. d. Page 36 — The 2"d paragraph also mentions having two outbound lanes for the alley access. As discussed above, the SB left -out movement will not be allowed. e. Page 38 —The 1" and 2"d paragraphs anticipate a future signal, this signal needs to be done with this redevelopment of the fuel center. f. Page 40 — This section discusses this access being a right-in/right-out; however, as it is currently built, it allows left turns. The access should be reconstructed to restrict left- turning movements. g. Page 41 — This section discusses this access being a right-in/right-out; however, as it is currently built, it allows left turns. The access should be reconstructed to restrict left- turning movements. h. Page 42 — The LOS for the individual movements for the Youngfield signalized access should also be included in Table 8. 6. Intersection Queuing Analysis a. Page 44 — The following changes should be made to Table 10: i. The queues for the through movements at all of the intersections should be included. ii. The existing lane length for the WB thru/right movement at the Youngfield signalized access should be included. b. Page 45 — The 2"d paragraph discusses the design for an EB left turn lane for the alley access. The WB left turn lanes cannot be shortened. The 32nd & Youngfield intersection has been designed to accommodate large amounts of additional traffic from the development site west of 1-70 and the eventual relocation of the EB 1-70 ramps to the south. Applewood Traffic Study September 29, 2015 Page 3 7. Conclusions and Recommendations — Several of the conclusions and recommendations will need to be revised to reflect the comments made elsewhere in this memo. Appendix D — Intersection Analysis Worksheets 8. As noted previously, the timing for the traffic signal at 32"d & Youngfield was revised recently. The actual timing for the signal should be obtained from the City and used for the modeling Appendix E — Queuing Analysis Worksheets 9. The queues for several turning movements at the 32"d & Youngfield intersection show that they exceed the available capacity. This appears to be in error. 10. The WB right at the 32"d & Youngfield intersection appears to be the longest queue for the weekday pm. This needs to be shown on Table 10. • TAftA T!!:9 V Sterling Design Associates, Ilc ::IVIL ENGINEERS - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Date: 08.07.15 To: Meredith Reckert, AICP, Senior Planner From: Owen Keenan, PE RE: Starbucks — 12755 W 32nd Avenue — Specific Development Plan First Round Formal Comment Responses Dear Ms. Reckert, Please find enclosed a revised Specific Development Plan submittal package for the proposed Starbucks at 12755 W. 32nd Avenue. It is important to note that the horizontal layout of the site has been modified significantly from our original submittal package dated March 25, 2015. Site layout modifications are proposed for two key reasons. The first is an attempt to address some of the Starbucks site specific comments received in the I s� Review Letter from Mark Westberg pertaining to the Applewood Village Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study dated May 14, 2015. The second is in order to improve the overall Starbucks site traffic circulation as preferred by both Starbucks and Regency Centers. Major Site layout modifications include the following: • A full -movement Alley access containing an inbound lane, an outbound left turn lane and an outbound right turn lane onto W. 32nd Avenue. • A connection to the Applewood Shopping Center to the north. • Removal of the Right -in only entrance off of W. 32nd Avenue • Two-way traffic lane around the west side of the building. To address the I5, Review letter from Mark Westberg on the Applewood Village Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study, specific comment responses and a revised Traffic Impact Study will be submitted separately by Kimley-Horn and has not been included in this submittal package. I have been assured by Regency Centers that the site design configuration included in these plans match what will be submitted in the revised Traffic Impact Study. Please find our formal responses to the I st Round Comments below in bold SHEET ONE 1. Make sure the top border is at least 1" in width for the recording information. The top border on all of the SDP plan sheets has been changed to 1" wide. 2. Modify the title to read as follows: Jay M. Newell, PE Wayne T. Sterling, RLA, LEED AP 2009 W. Littleton Blvd. #300 Littleton, CO 80120 303.794.4727 ph www.SterlingDesignAssociates.com Sterling Design Associates, Ilc _IVIL ENG!NFFRc_, I nN1r)SCAPE ARCHITECTS "Starbucks Drive-Thru — Applewood Village Shopping Center PCD An Official Development plan in the City of Wheat Ridge............" The title should be carried out for the entire plan set. The title on each of the sheets within the entire plan set has been changed to the above-mentioned title. 3. Remove the agency referral information. The agency referral information has been removed from the sheet. 4. In the Character of Development statement, remove the reference to "approved by a special use permit". "Approved by special use permit" has been removed from the Character of Development statement. 5. The square footage and acreage figures should all be the same and should reflect what is shown on the plat. The square footage and acreage figures have been changed to be consistent with the plat. 6. In the lot coverage portion of the table, modify the category under Open Space/Landscaping category from "sod" to "living landscaping". "Sod" has been changed to 'living landscaping" within the site data table. 7. In the Open Space/Landscaping category does the number for hardscape reflect the non -living landscaping (uncovered patios, internal sidewalks, etc) or hard surface coverage on the property? I would suggest a separate category (not included in the landscape calculation) be named hard surfaces which would include parking, drives and other hard surfaces. The figures for Building coverage, Open space/Landscaping and hard surfaced coverage should equal total lot area. Hardscape is now explained in the Site Data Table as uncovered patios and internal sidewalks. The table has been changed to include a separate "hard surfaces" category with it explained as parking, drives and hard surfaces. The figures for Building, Open space/Landscaping and Hard surfaces equal total lot area. In the Site Data Table, remove the category for net area. The "net area" category has been removed. 9. Below the table, remove the note referencing net area. The "net area" note below the table has been removed. Jay M. Newell, PE Wayne T. Sterling, RLA, LEED AP 2009 W. Littleton Blvd. #300 Littleton, CO 80120 303.794.4727 ph www.SterlingDesignAssociates.com �c Sterling Design Associates, Ilc —M! ENGINEERS - ! ANMD CAPr ARCHITECTS 10. In the Site Data Table, indicate that the gross lot area includes right-of-way reservations for 32"d Avenue and Youngfield. A note in the Table has been added to state that right-of-way reservations are included in the gross area calculation. 11. Under the Site Data Table, reference the recording data for the recording date of the Applewood Village Shopping Center Outline Development Plan. The ODP recording date has been added to the note under the Table. 12. Add a note indicating address of property is 12755 W. 32nd Avenue. A note stating that the address is 12755 W 32"d Avenue has been added. 13. Add a case history box with the following case numbers: SUP -13-04, WZ-14-09, WZ-15- 02, MS -15-01. A case history box and case numbers have been added. 14. Remove the note indicating "Preliminary — not for construction". The "Preliminary — not for construction" note has been deleted. 15. Modify the signature block for Planning Commission as they will be the reviewing authority. The signature block now reads "Approved" for Planning Commission's use as the reviewing authority. 16. Modify the City signature block per redlines. As redlined, "Wheat Ridge City Council" has been removed and "City of Wheat Ridge" remains for the city's use for project certification. SHEET TWO 1. Remove the note indicating "Preliminary— not for construction". The "Preliminary — not for construction" note has been deleted. 2. Remove the "Notice to Contractor" note. The "Notice to Contractor"/811 note has been removed. 3. Are any freestanding signs proposed? If so, the location and sign detail should be shown. Sheets 6, 7 and 8 of 11 have been added to the sheet set to show proposed sign locations and details. 4. Indicate material for parking spaces. Jay M. Newell, PE Wayne T. Sterling, RLA, LEED AP 2009 W. Littleton Blvd. #300 Littleton, CO 80120 303.794.4727 ph www.SterlingDesignAssociates.com Sterling Design Associates, Ilc CIVIL ENGINEERS - ANDSCAPE ARCK i L�. i No hatching indicates Automobile Parking Asphalt Pavement (or the minimum asphalt pavement section recommended in the Geotechnical Report). The legend has been updated to reflect this. The striping has been specified as 3M Liquid Pavement Marking Series 1200 — Color: White. Striping Paint has been specified on the Construction Plans, Sheet C201. Specify the material for the screen wall. Staff would support brick, but not CMU. The detail of the screen wall has been revised to specify a brick veneer. 6. If the 0' to 20' build -to cannot be met, a variance request should be included with the application. A 10' variance request and fee has been provided in this submittal. SHEET THREE 1. The property owner indicated that the 12755 W 32"d Avenue address was to be used for the property. If this is the case, please remove the reference to the Youngfield address. The property address will be 12755 W 32nd Avenue and been referenced as such on the plan. 2. On both building facades, add maximum square footages for the signs shown. Maximum square footages for the signs shown have been added on both building facades. 3. Add a building materials summary for each fa4ade using percentages. A building materials summary using percentages for each facade has been added. 4. Add a transparency summary for each facade using percentages. A transparency summary using percentages for each fafiade has been added. 5. On the western fa4ade, designate the question labels on the patio roof. The labels have been updated to designate the patio roof materials. 6. Remove the Exterior Elevation Notes. The Exterior Elevation Notes have been removed. SHEET FOUR On both building facades, add maximum square footages for the signs shown. Maximum square footages for the signs shown have been added on both building facades. 2. Add a building materials summary for each facade using percentages Jay M. Newell, PE Wayne T. Sterling, RLA, LEED AP 2009 W. Littleton Blvd. #300 Littleton, CO 80120 303.794.4727 ph www.SterlingDesignAssociates.com Sterling Design Associates, Ilc CIVIL ENGINEER nI, , r;r T. A building materials summary using percentages for each facade has been added. 3. Add a transparency summary for each facade using percentages. A transparency summary using percentages for each facade has been added. 4. On the western facade designate the question labels on the patio roof. The labels have been updated to designate the patio roof materials. 5. Remove the Exterior Elevation Notes. The Exterior Elevation Notes have been removed. 6. With regard to the wall signs on the eastern elevation, typically wall signs are allowed on building walls which face a street or major interior drive. Please provide justification for the wall signs on the eastern facade. The eastern elevation faces the main drive aisle into the shopping center from the south, which should be considered a major interior drive, as this is the only access into the shopping center from W. 32"d Avenue. LANDSCAPE PLAN 1. Sheet L101 of the civil construction plan set needs to be incorporated into the SDP plan set. It should be given the same title and renumbered consistent with the other sheets. The Landscape Plan has been retitled, renumbered and incorporated into the SDP sheet set. 2. Remove the note to contractor on the bottom left corner of the sheet. The "Notice to Contractor"/811 note has been removed. 3. Remove the note indicating "preliminary" The "Preliminary — not for construction" note has been deleted. 4. In the Landscape Data, the minimum landscape coverage is 10%. The figures should be adjusted accordingly. The figures in the Landscape Data table have been adjusted. 5. The figures in the Landscape Data table should match the front sheet. The figures in the Landscape Data table and on the cover sheet now match. 6. Add a note that all living landscaping shall be served by an automatic, zoned irrigation system. A note has been added indicating that all living landscaping shall be served by an automatic, zoned irrigation system. Jay M. Newell, PE Wayne T. Sterling, RLA, LEED AP 2009 W. Littleton Blvd. #300 Littleton. CO 80120 303.794.4727 ph www.SterlingDesignAssociates.com Sterling Design Associates, Ilc CIVIL ENGINEERS "SCAPE ARCHITECTS PHOTOMETRIC PLAN Sheet L101 of the civil construction plan set needs to be incorporated into the SDP plan set. It should be given the same title and renumbered consistent with the other sheets. The Photometric Plan has been retitled, renumbered and incorporated into the SDP sheet set. Remove the note to contractor on the bottom left corner of the sheet. The "Notice to Contractor"/811 note has been removed. Remove the note indicating "preliminary". The 'Preliminary — not for construction" note has been deleted. CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. To -date no traffic information has been received. Public Works may have comments affecting the SDP upon review of the Traffic Impact Study. The horizontal layout of the site has changed significantly from the layout from the initial 3/25 plan submittal date. Changes were due to a combination of the comments received regarding the initial review of the Applewood Village Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study and the desire by Starbucks and Regency Centers to improve the overall site traffic circulation. The current site layout coincides with the revised Traffic Impact Study prepared by Kimley- Horn. The revised Traffic Impact Study will be submitted separately by Kimley- Horn and is not included in this package. FINAL PLAT Final Plat comments are not a part of this submittal package. These comments have been omitted from this letter. CIVIL ENGINEERING Drainage Letter In the 3'd paragraph on page 1: a. Include FEMA before Zone X in the first sentence. b. Correct the typo in the second sentence. The drainage letter has been revised reflecting the changes above. Please see the revised Letter. 2. In the 2"d paragraph, page 2, describe the ultimate destination of the overflow runoff and any potential negative impacts resulting from these additional flows. Jay M. Newell, PE Wayne T. Sterling, RLA, LEED AP 2009 W. Littleton Blvd. #300 Littleton, CO 80120 303.794.4727 ph www.SterlingDesignAssociates.com V Sterling Design Associates, Ilc CIVIL ENGINEER I- Cc _ I ; , r. � _, - The drainage letter has been revised describing the ultimate destination of overflow runoff in the event of on-site inlet clogging. Please see the revised Letter. Upon completion of the above corrections, please include on wet -stamped hardcopy and a PDF file containing the signed and sealed revised Letter with the next submittal for Public Works approval. Due to the significant site layout changes, and subsequent, significant changes to the drainage calculations, an un -stomped "preliminary" copy has been issued for your review. Drainage Plan 1. In the two references to the Master Drainage Report by Kimley-Horn, please include the revision date of Rev. March 17, 2015. The revision date of the Kimley-Horn report has been added to the Drainage Plan. Please see the revised sheet. 2. Upon completion of the above corrections, please include one wet -stamped hardcopy and a PDF file containing the signed and sealed plan with the next submittal for Public Works approval Due to the significant site layout changes, and subsequent, significant changes to drainage basins and calculations, an un -stomped "preliminary" copy has been issued for your review. Construction Plans C 100 (Cover Sheet) 1. Please modify my information and add the information for our Stormwater Coordinator under the "Agency Referrals" list. The Agency Referral list has been updated. Please see the revised sheet C100. Please include this Note at the end of the Wheat Ridge General Notes: "20. NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR: IF MORE THAN THREE (3) STREET CUTS OCCUR WITHIN 250 LINEAR FEET, ADDITIONAL MILLING/OVERLAY REQUIREMENTS WILL APPLY. REFER TO THE TERMS FO THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE ROW CONSTRUCTION PERMIT (THAT MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, 303.235.2861, PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK)." The requested note has been added at the end of the Wheat Ridge General Notes. Please see Note 1120 on the revised sheet C100. C201 (Site Plan 1. The ADA ramp on the east side of the full -movement drive from W. 32"d Avenue (Entrance 3) must be constructed with this project. Jay M. Newell, PE Wayne T. Sterling, RLA, LEED AP 2009 W. Littleton Blvd. #300 Littleton. CO 80120 303.794.4727 ph www.SterlingDesignAssociates.com �c Sterling Design Associates, Ilc CIVIL ENGINEERrc •.ar ro An existing ramp at this location currently exists. I have verified that truncated domes exist at this ramp and I've added existing truncated domes to the CAD. This sidewalk ramp has been called out as an existing sidewalk ramp to remain and be protected throughout construction. Please see revised sheet C201. C303 (Street Profiles) Please include this Note at the end of the General Notes: "21. NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR: IF MORE THAN THREE (3) STREET CUTS OCCUR WITHIN 250 LINEAR FEET, ADDITIONAL MILLING/OVERLAY REQUIREMENTS WILL APPLY. REFER TO THE TERMS FO THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE ROW CONSTRUCTION PERMIT (THAT MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, 303.235.2861, PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK)." The requested note has been added under General Notes, Note #21. Please see revised sheet C303. The ADA ramp on the east side of the full -movement drive from W. 32nd Avenue ("Entrance 3") must be constructed with this project. An existing ramp at this location currently exists. I have verified that truncated domes exist at this ramp and I've added existing truncated domes to the CAD. This sidewalk ramp has been called out as an existing sidewalk ramp to remain and be protected throughout construction. Please see revised sheet C303. C304 (Street Details) 1. Please include the following City -standard details: S-E01_HMA.dwg (Typical Asphalt Detail) The City Standard Typical Asphalt Detail has been added to the sheet. Please see revised sheet C304. C404 (Erosion Control Details) Please remove the City of Aurora details for the Rock Socks. The City of Aurora detail for rock socks has been removed from the plans. Please see revised sheet C404. C50 (Utility Plan) .. Please include this Note at the end of the General Notes: "20. NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR: IF MORE THAN THREE (3) STREET CUTS OCCUR WITHIN 250 LINEAR FEET, ADDITIONAL MILLING/OVERLAY REQUIREMENTS WILL APPLY. REFER TO THE TERMS FO THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE ROW CONSTRUCTION PERMIT (THAT MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, 303.235.2861, PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK)." The requested note has been added under General Notes, Note #14. Please see revised sheet C501. )ay M. Newell, PE Wayne T. Sterling, RLA, LEED AP 2009 W. Littleton Blvd. #300 Littleton, CO 80120 303.794.4727 ph www.SteriingDesignAssociates.com �c Sterling Design Associates, Ilc JGINEER -,NDS. •.:'E ARCHITECTS C503 (Storm Profile & Details) 1. The pipe profile should be reversed to correspond to the plan views on all the other sheets (west being on the left, east on the right). The profile direction has been reversed as requested to correspond with plan views. Please see revised sheet C503, Profile Storm -1. ADDITIONAL Right -of -Way Construction Permit(s)/Licensing: a. ROW Permits. Prior to any construction within the public right-of-way (ROW), the necessary Right -of -Way Construction Permit(s) and respective licensing will need to be submitted for processing by the City. Right -of -Way Construction Permits are issued by the City only after approval of all required technical documents, including but not limited to, the Final Drainage Report & Plan, Final Plat, Final Development Plan, Traffic Impact Study, Storm Sewer Plans, Street Construction Plans, Grading & Erosion Control Plan, Traffic Control Plan, and easement or ROW dedications. b. Licensing. All work within the public Right -of -Way shall only be performed by a municipally -licensed contractor. Acknowledged. Drainage Certification Letter with As -Built Plans: Upon completion of the drainage improvements, the Engineer -of -Record Mr. Owen Keenan, P.E., shall provide to the City of Wheat Ridge a written, signed and sealed Drainage Certification Letter stating that the site grading was completed per the approved Drainage Plan, that the site conforms to and shall function as defined in the approved Final Drainage Letter, and that the site has been accurately surveyed to confirm that the grading was completed in accordance with these documents. Prior to Final Approval by Public Works and issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy, the Drainage Certification Letter shall be submitted to the City for review and approval and be accompanied by As -Built Plans containing sufficient elevations in support of said Letter. Thee (3) copies of the "As -Built" Plans are to be submitted as follows: a. 1 hardcopy is to be on full-size 24"x36" bond paper, signed and sealed, AND b. 2 copies are to be on electronic media: one (1) file in AutoCAD DWG format and one (1) file in PDF format. Acknowledged. Traffic Impact Study Comments from Mark Westberg The Traffic Impact Study Comments are being addressed separately by Kimley- Horn. The current Starbucks site layout reflects the overall layout being Jay M. Newell, PE Wayne T. Sterling, RLA, LEED AP 2009 W. Littleton Blvd. #300 Littleton, CO 80120 303.794.4727 ph www.SterlingDesignAssociates.com Sterling Design Associates, Ilc :LER, ".,v[D;,_ rL ARCHITECTS proposed in the revised Traffic Impact Study. Comment responses and revised Traffic Impact Study will be submitted separately and are not included in this SDP submittal package. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1. Any signing for this business that advertises to Interstate 70 must be on -premise in nature and can only advertise goods or services available on that property. Acknowledged. WHEAT RIDGE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT A Commercial Site Planning Guide is attached and should be provided to the applicant. All requirements established in the Commercial Site Planning Guide, as well as the 2012 International Fire Code and IFC amendments adopted by the City of Wheat Ridge shall be met unless approved by the Division of Fire Prevention. Acknowledged. While we have no concerns regarding our ability to serve the property, specific site requirements including water supply/hydrant location, site access, building configuration, site infrastructure, etc, may require fire department review and approval. The applicant is encouraged to request fire department input at the earliest reasonable opportunity. Based on the plans provided: a. Additional water supply (fire hydrant) is required along Youngfield Street. Contact the Consolidated Mutual Water Company for additional information. An additional fire hydrant is shown on the revised SDP along Youngfield Street. We are currently working with Consolidated Mutual on approval. Access to the property via private drive does not appear to comply with dimension requirements of the fire code. Please review the attached Commercial Site Planning Guide and the City of Wheat Ridge amendments to the 2012 International Fire Code for additional Information. Site access is provided from the Right -of -Way of Youngfield Street and W. 32"d Avenue. From the adjacent public streets, all portions of the proposed exterior building are within 150' as measured by routing around the building. Therefore, no private site access has been provided. The applicant should be made aware that the proposed project may require one or more Fire Department Permits. Acknowledged. Jay M. Newell, PE Wayne T. Sterling, RLA, LEED AP 2009 W. Littleton Blvd. #300 Littleton. CO 80120 303.794.4727 ph www.SterlingDesignAssociates.com V Sterling Design Associates, Ilc -IVIL ENGINEERS - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS NORTHWEST LAKEWOOD SANITATION DISTRICT The applicant acknowledges receipt of the NWLSD Letter dated March 31, 2015. Sterling Design has been in direct contact with NWLSD on proposed sanitary sewer service improvements for the Starbucks Site. CONSOLIDATED MUTUAL WATER COMPANY The applicant acknowledges receipt of the Consolidated Mutual Water Company Letter dated March 31, 2015. Sterling Design has been in direct contact with CMWC regarding the domestic water meter/service sizing and Fire Hydrant Location. XCEL ENERGY The applicant acknowledges receipt of the Xcel Energy Letter dated April 13, 2015. Changes are shown on the project plan drawings. One 24"x36" hardcopy, one 11"x17" hardcopy, and .pdf and .dwg files of the revised drawings are included for this resubmittal. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please feel free to contact me via email at owen@sterlingdesignassociates.com or via phone at 303.794.4727 ex. 206. Thank you. Owen Keenan, PE Sterling Design Associates, LLC Civil Engineers— Landscape Architects Jay M. Newell, PE Wayne T. Sterling, RLA, LEED AP 2009 W. Littleton Blvd. #300 Littleton, CO 80120 303.794.4727 ph www.SterlingDesignAssociates.com March 25, 2015 Revised August 7, 2015 Mr. Dave Brossman Development Review Manager Wheat Ridge Public Works Department 7500 W. 291h Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 RE: Drainage Letter — Starbucks at 12755 W. 32"d Avenue Dear Mr. Brossman, V Sterling Design Associates, Ilc Sterling Design Associates is providing this letter and plan as the drainage design for the above mentioned site. Existing Site Conditions The proposed site as it currently exist is vacant land; however, before demolition of the existing buildings, the site contained a gas station at the 3210 Youngfield Street address and commercial retail building at the 12755 W. 32nd Avenue address. The site is located on the northeast corner of Youngfield Street and W. 32nd Avenue. The site is bounded to the east by the service alley to Applejack Wine and Spirits and vacant building, to the south by W. 32"d Avenue, to the west by Youngfield Street, and to the North by Chili's Restaurant. The site as it existed historically appeared to have been primarily paved outside of the building footprint. The total area of both parcels of land that comprise the site is 0.80 acres. In its existing state, the site slopes gently to the east at approximately 2.0% on average. The site is located in FEMA Zone X (No Shading), which are areas determined to be outside of the 0.2% annual chance Floodplain. No known city or private storm sewer exist either along street frontages or adjacent properties. The Lee, Stewart and Eskins Ditch pipeline (30" dia. RCP) exists within the Right -of -Way along Youngfield Street on the west side of the site. Existing soils on-site are Denver -Urban Land Complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes which are classified as Hydrologic Soil Group C. Proposed Conditions The vacant site is proposed to be re -developed into a 2,500 square foot Starbucks Cafd with a Drive-Thru, covered patio area, and associated store parking. In post development conditions, the site is comprised of eight sub -basins. Each sub -basin is described in detail below. Sub -Basin A 1(0.24 acre) is composed of asphalt parking, concrete walks, roof drainage, and landscaped area. The Sub -Basin is located on the western portion of the site and runoff is conveyed via the catch curb section and 2 -foot wide pan to a Single Wheat Ridge Valley Inlet on grade (longitudinal pan slope is 0.5%). C values for this basin are 0.67 and 0.78 for the 5 and 100 -year storm events, respectively. Direct runoff rates are 0.82 and 1.80 cfs for the 5 and 100 - year storm events, respectively. The proposed inlet will capture 0.65 and 1.15 cfs in the 5 and 100 -year storm events, respectively. Carry-over flows from this inlet will continue east and then north to a sump inlet located in Sub -Basin A2. Sub -Basin A2 (0.53 acre) is composed of asphalt parking, concrete walks, roof drainage, and landscaped area. The Sub -Basin is located on the eastern portion of the site and is bound to the east by the street crown of the Alley in the proposed condition. Runoff is conveyed via catch curb and gutter and a 2 -foot wide pan to a Single Wheat Ridge Combination Inlet in the sump condition. C values for this basin are 0.62 and 0.73 for the 5 and 100 -year storm events, respectively. Direct runoff rates are 1.63 and 3.66 cfs for the 5 and 100 -year storm events, respectively. Total runoff rates (including carry-over flow from Sub -Basin Al) are 1.70 and 4.12 cfs for the 5 and 100 -year storm events. The proposed inlet is designed to capture the 5 and 100 - year storm events. The inlet is connected to a proposed storm sewer system that will convey runoff via 15 -inch and 18 -inch RCP to a manhole (STORM MH #6), which is part of a storm sewer continuation analyzed in a Master Drainage Report for the Applewood Village Shopping Center, prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, revised March 17, 2015 (Master Drainage Report). Offsite storm sewer will convey on-site runoff to a detention basin outlined in this report. In the event of an inlet failure, runoff would pool to a peak depth of 8 -inches and would be conveyed to the north along the Applejack Wine and Spirits Service Alley (Service Alley). Runoff would enter an existing sump inlet located in the loading/unloading area of the Service Alley. The inlet collects runoff in a wet well and pumps are used to discharge the stormwater to the north in the alley between the Applejack's and the strip mall to the west. Runoff continues to the north where it discharges to the private curb and gutter. Sub -Basin A3 (0.18 acre) is composed of asphalt drive -aisle and curb and gutter section in the Applejack Wine and Spirits Service Alley/Starbucks Site entrance off of W. 32"d Avenue and roof drainage associated the vacant building east of the site. The southernmost downspout attached to the vacant building will discharge to this basin and will be conveyed to the proposed curb and gutter. Runoff; in general is conveyed northeast from a high point/drainage ridge at the W. 32"d Entrance to a catch curb and gutter section along the east side of the Service Alley. Once intercepted by the curb and gutter, runoff is conveyed to the north to a Single Wheat Ridge Combination Inlet on -grade (longitudinal alley slope 0.63%). C values for this basin are 0.76 and 0.84 for the 5 and 100 -year storm events, respectively. Direct runoff rates are 0.69 and 1.45 cfs for the 5 and 100 -year storm events, respectively. The proposed inlet is designed to capture 96% of the 5 year and 76% of the 100 -year storm water flows. By-pass flows will continue north to Basin OS 1. The inlet is connected to a proposed storm sewer system that will convey runoff via 15 -inch, 18 -inch and 24 -inch RCP to a manhole (STORM MH #6) as outlined in the Master Drainage Report. Offsite storm sewer will convey on-site runoff to a detention basin outlined in this report. In the event of an inlet failure, runoff would continue north along the Service Alley. Runoff would enter an existing sump inlet located in the loading/unloading area of the Service Alley. The inlet collects runoff in a wet well and pumps are used to discharge the stormwater to the north in the alley between the Applejack's and the strip mall to the west. Runoff continues to the north where it discharges to the private curb and gutter. Sub -Basin B1 (0. 13 acre) is composed of roof drainage from the adjacent vacant building to the east of the site, along the east side of the Service Alley. Roof drainage from this building is discharged via 3 downspouts located along the west side of the existing building. Sub -Basin B I is the downspout located in the middle between the northernmost and southernmost downspouts. C values for this basin are 0.75 and 0.83 for the 5 and 100 -year storm events, respectively. Direct runoff rates are 0.50 and 1.05 cfs for the 5 and 100 -year storm events, respectively. The end of the downspout will be connected to an 4 -inch diameter PVC pipe that will be piped to the proposed inlet located in Sub -Basin A3. Runoff from this basin will be captured in the proposed storm system and ultimately connected to the offsite storm sewer as outlined in the Master Drainage Report. Sub -Basin OS 1 (0.14 acre) is composed of asphalt drive aisle, curb and gutter section and roof drainage from the adjacent vacant building to east of the site. This basin contains the northernmost downspout. Runoff from this basin is conveyed via curb and gutter along the existing building to the north where it discharges into existing Service Alley. C values for this basin are 0.76 abd 0.84 for the 5 and 100 -year storm events, respectively. Direct runoff rates are 0.54 and 1.12 cfs for the 5 and 100 -year storm events, respectively. By-pass storm flows from Basin A3 enter basin OS 1, however flows are minor, yield routed peak flowrates of 0.54 and 1.42 cfs for the 5 and 100 -year storm events. Although by-pass flows enter this basin, they are minor and an overall reduction in flows being introduced to the Service Alley north of the proposed inlets is anticipated. Existing conditions indicate approximate runoff rates of 1.7 and 3.6 cfs for the 5 and 100 -year storm events at Design Point 6. Runoff from this basin enters an existing inlet located in the loading/unloading area of the Service Alley. The inlet collects runoff in a wet well and pumps are used to discharge the stormwater to the north in the alley between the Applejack's and the strip mall to the west. Runoff continues to the north where it discharges to the private curb and gutter. Sub -Basin OS2 (0.01 acre) is composed of asphalt drive and landscaping. Runoff from this basin is conveyed to the north east to the existing parking lot just east of Chili's Restaurant. Runoff is conveyed to an existing drainage pan and is conveyed to the north. C values for this basin are 0.34 and 0.58 for the 5 and 100 -year storm events, respectively. Direct runoff rates are 0.02 and 0.08 cfs for the 5 and 100 -year storm events, respectively. Sub -Basin OS3 (0.02 acre) is composed of landscaped area that will discharge via sheet flow off- site to the property to the north (Chili's Restaurant). Runoff is discharged to an existing drainage swale located on the south side of the Chili's building and to an existing drainage pan located in the Chili's parking lot. C values for this basin are 0.15 and 0.50 for the 5 and 100 -year storm events, respectively. Direct runoff rates are 0.01 and 0.08 cfs for the 5 and 100 -year storm events, respectively. Detention The Master Drainage Report was prepared in order to redevelop portions of the shopping center outside the limits of this project and provide detention requirements for all areas of redevelopment, including the Starbucks site. The detention basin proposed as part of this project will detain the Water Quality Capture Volume (WQCV), 5 -year plus 100% of the WQCV and 100 -year plus 50% of the WQCV. The Starbucks site lies in Basin F of this report and was assumed to be 95% impervious which is significantly more than the 74.7% imperviousness that will exist once the site is developed based on improvements within the subject property (Site Property). As part of the Master Drainage Report, storm sewer is proposed to be installed to Storm MH #6 as identified on the Master Drainage Plan, Sheet 1 of 2. Storm sewer from the Starbucks site will tie into this manhole and will be conveyed to the proposed detention pond. Calculated design flowrates in this report for Basin F are 3.1 and 5.9 cfs for the 5 and 100 -year storm events, respectively. Included with this letter are detailed calculations which yield peak flowrates in the connecting storm sewer of 3.36 cfs and 7.18 cfs for the 5 and 100 -year storm events, respectively. The increase in flowrate is due to the additional drainage associated with the existing building roof drainage associated with the B 1 and A3 Sub -Basins as indicated in this report. Roof drainage associated with the vacant building is located in Basin E of the Master Drainage Report. The 24 -inch storm sewer as designed in the Master Drainage Report (Storm #5) has enough capacity to convey the 7.18 cfs generated by the proposed improvements to Storm MH #6. Due to the lower actual imperviousness of the site as detailed in this letter when compared to the Master Drainage Report, the detention basin as designed would be providing additional WQCV and detention volume for Basin F than what is required. Storm sewers designed in the Master Drainage Report would be adequate to handle on-site storm flows. It is anticipated that construction of the King Soopers fuel center and detention pond will be in the Summer of 2015. This timing would coincide and with the construction of the proposed storm sewer improvements on-site. At this time, an interim condition WQCV pond for this site has not been designed. Conclusions In general, the proposed project minimizes the amount runoff entering and exiting the Site with the exception of what is conveyed to the storm sewer system. Areas in which runoff comes in contact with proposed impervious surfaces are conveyed to three storm inlets located on site. The storm sewer is designed to capture the 5 and 100 -year storm events and convey runoff via storm sewer to the proposed offsite storm sewer system and detention pond designed in the Master Drainage Report. Curb and gutter improvements along the existing vacant building on the east side of the Service Alley will be a significant improvement to the overall drainage design of the Service Alley. The curb and gutter improvements will define a runoff pattern adjacent to the building and provide adequate relief in the storm events. Adjacent site roof drainage will be intercepted by the proposed storm sewer will reduce runoff continuing north along the Service Alley to the sump inlet with wet well and pumps. The Starbucks site improvements as designed will improve drainage patterns within the existing site as well as the adjacent Service Alley. Drainage Calculations have been provided as attachments in this letter. Calculations were performed using the latest version of the City of Wheat Ridge Site Drainage Requirements. Appropriate tables and charts used have been attached to this letter. If additional information is required please don't hesitate to contact me at 303-7944727 ext. 206. Regards, Owen Keenan, PE Civil Engineer Sterling Design Associates, LLC Attachments: Tables/Charts Runoff Calculations Inlet Calculations 5 and 100 -yr Storm Sewer Routing Drainage Plan 0 E:J 7 X O 6 s w CL C 5 Lu U z 4 r H w z 3 2 0 O 10 20 30 40 50 60 TIME IN MINUTES FIGURE 5-1 EXAMPLE 5.2 TIME - INTENSITY - FREOUENCY CURVES T. 3 S. R.66 W. 5-1-84 URBAN DRAINAGC A FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 1 A recent subdivision has an approved Drainage Report/Plan on file. 32 Rev. 10/14 Reference the UDFCD Criteria " Not required for a Preliminary Report l G y� x c, Z YEA R 10 20 30 40 50 60 TIME IN MINUTES FIGURE 5-1 EXAMPLE 5.2 TIME - INTENSITY - FREOUENCY CURVES T. 3 S. R.66 W. 5-1-84 URBAN DRAINAGC A FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 1 A recent subdivision has an approved Drainage Report/Plan on file. 32 Rev. 10/14 Reference the UDFCD Criteria " Not required for a Preliminary Report TABLE RO-3 Recommended Percentage Imperviousness Values Land Use or Surface Characteristics Percentage Imperviousness Business: Commercial areas 95 Nei hborhood areas 85 Residential: Single-family Multi -unit detached 60 Multi -unit attached 75 Half -acre lot or larger Apartments 80 Industrial: Light areas 80 Heavy areas 90 Parks, cemeteries 5 Playgrounds 10 Schools 50 Railroad yard areas 15 Undeveloped Areas: Historic flow analysis 2 Greenbelts, agricultural 2 Off-site flow analysis when land use not defined 45 Streets: Paved 100 Gravel(packed) 40 Drive and walks 90 Roofs 90 — -- Lawns, sandy soil 0 Lawns, clayey soil 0 'See Figures RO-3 through RO-5, Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual, Volume 1, June 2001, for percentage imperviousness. 1 A recent subdivision has an approved Orainage Report/Plan on file 33 Rev. 10114 Reference the UDFCD Criteria " Not required for a Preliminary Report TABLE RO-5 Runoff Coefficients, C Percentage Imperviousness nd D NRCS H drolo is Soil Grou s 2 -yr 10- r 25- r 50- r 100- r 0% 5% 10% 0.04 0.08 0.11 nr 0.25 0.28 0.30 0.37 0.39 0.41 0.44 0.46 0.47 0.50 0.52 0.53 15% 0.14 0.24 0.32 0.43 0.49 0.54 20% 0.17 0.26 0.34 0.44 0.50 0.55 25% 30% 0.20 0.22 0.28 0.30 0.36 0.380.47 0.46 0.51 0.52 0.56 0.57 35% 0.25 0.33 0.40 0.48 0.53 0.57 40% 45% 0.28 0.31 0.35 0.37 0.42 0.44 0.50 0.51 0.54 0.55 0.58 0.59 50% 0.34 0.40 0.46 0.53 0.57 0.60 55% 0.37 0.43 0.48 0.55 0.58 0.62 60% 0.41 0.46 0.51 0.57 0.60 0.63 65% 0.45 0.49 0.54 0.59 0.62 0.65 70% 0.49 0.53 0.57 0.62 0.65 0.68 75% 0.54 0.58 0.62 0.66 0.68 0.71 80% 0.60 0.63 0.66 0.70 0.72 0.74 85% 0.66 0.68 0.71 0.75 0.77 0.79 90% 0.73 0.75 0.77 0.80 0.82 0.83 95% 0.80 0.82 0.84 0.87 0.88 0.89 100% 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.95 0.96 Type B NRCS H drolo is Soils Grou 0% 0.02 0.08 0.15 0.25 0.30 0.35 5% 0.04 0.10 0.19 0.28 0.33 0.38 10% 0.06 0.14 0.22 0.31 0.36 0.40 15% 0.08 0.17 0.25 0.33 0.38 0.42 20% 0.12 0.20 0.27 0.35 0.40 0.44 25% 0.15 0.22 0.30 0.37 0.41 0.46 30% 0.18 0.25 0.32 0.39 0.43 0.47 35% 0.20 0.27 0.34 0.41 0.44 0.48 40% 0.23 0.30 0.36 0.42 0.46 0.50 45% 0.26 0.32 0.38 0.44 0.48 0.51 50% 0.29 0.35 0.40 0.46 0.49 0.52 55% 0.33 0.38 0.43 0.48 0.51 0.54 60% 0.37 0.41 0.46 0.51 0.54 0.56 65% 0.41 0.45 0.49 0.54 0.57 0.59 70% 0.45 0.49 0.53 0.58 0.60 0.62 75% 0.510.54 0.58 0.62 0.64 0.66 80% 0.57 0.59 0.63 0.66 0.68 0.70 85% 0.63 0.66 0.69 0.72 0.73 0.75 90% 0.71 0.73 0.75 0.78 0.80 0.81 950% 0.79 0.81 0.83 0.85 0.87 0.88 100% 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.95 0.96 1 A recent subdivision has an approved Drainage Report/Plan on file. 35 Rev. 10/14 Reference the UDFCD Criteria Not required for a Preliminary Report TABLE RO-5 (CONTINUED) Runoff Coefficients, C Percentage Imperviousness A NRCS H drolo is Soil Groups 2 -yr 10 r 25- r 50- r 100- r 0% 0.00 gr 0.050.5% 0.00 0.10 0.16 0.20 0.24 10% 0.00 0.06 0.14 0.20 0.24 0.28 15% 0.02 0.10 0.17 0.23 0.27 0.30 20% 0.06 0.13 0.20 0.26 0.30 0.33 25% 0.09 0.16 0.23 0.29 0.32 0.35 30% 0.13 0.19 0.25 0.31 0.34 0.37 35% 0.16 0.22 0.28 0.33 0.36 0.39 40% 0.19 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.38 0.41 45% 0.22 0.27 0.33 0.37 0.40 0.43 50% 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.42 0.45 55% 0.29 0.33 0.38 0.42 0.45 0.47 60% 0.33 0.37 0.41 0.45 0.47 0.50 65% 0.37 0.41 0.45 0.49 0.51 0.53 70% 0.42 0.45 0.49 0.53 0.54 0.56 75% 0.47 0.50 0.54 0.57 0.59 0.61 80% 0.54 0.56 0.60 0.63 0.64 0.66 85% 0.61 0.63 0.66 0.69 0.70 0.72 90% 0.69 0.71 0.73 0.76 0.77 0.79 95% 0.78 0.80 0.82 0.84 0.85 0.86 100% 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.95 0.96 1 A recent subdivision has an approved Drainage Report/Plan on file. 36 Rev. 10/14 Reference the UDFCD Criteria Not required for a Preliminary Report Weighted Imperviousness Date: 8/6/15 Job Name: Starbucks - 32nd Avenue & Youngfield - Wheat Ridge By: OKK 11 Roof 90 Lawns 0 Paved Streets t00 Conc. Drives & Walks 90 '% Impervious from Wheat Ridge Site Drainage Requirements - Table RO-3 Hydrologic Soil Group = C (NRCS Web Soil Survey) PROPOSED SITE Total A Basins 8611 5826 23788 3158 41383 0.95 83.1 0.66 0.77 Total 18559 6992 25660 3379 54590 1.25 83.2 0.66 0.77 Asphalt Conc. Drives Total Total Basin Roof Lavin Drives $ Walks (SF) (Acres) I (°/,) C5 C100 Al 1852 1339 6346 1072 10609 0.24 84.6 0.67 0.78 A2 1181 4429 15430 1853 22893 0.53 79.3 0.62 0.73 A3 5578 58 2012 233 7881 0.18 91.9 0.76 0.84 B1 5785 0 0 0 5785 0.13 90.0 0.75 0.83 OS1 4163 89 1635 221 6108 0.14 91.4 0.76 0.84 OS2 0 372 237 0 609 0.01 38.9 0.34 0.58 OS3 0 705 0 0 705 0.02 0.0 0.15 0.50 Site Property 3031 8191 20569 2957 34748 0.80 74.7 0.57 0.70 Total A Basins 8611 5826 23788 3158 41383 0.95 83.1 0.66 0.77 Total 18559 6992 25660 3379 54590 1.25 83.2 0.66 0.77 y m 0 c O C c C C C C C E E E E E E E d d m d m d d N c C c c G C C C C c c c c C E E E E E E E E LL' m E m m E E m m m E E E m E N tl� Q Q t�� tIN� Q Q Yj tlN� Q Q tlJ� Q c N u c n m � C L d u1 J LL N O H _N m U H a o ° j d E i= _ d � g m U ° o � N d O a � O N N L d J M C � O C m ;gid f- c t c LL Q d J O d Q ch Q c7 NLn — O N O Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c m 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 sp a Nam p 000 Ti ml milli MINIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII IN s Il MINIM 1 1110111 111 I MEN I I I MINIM 011111111111 0 U N � O � C 0 7 LL a. d Q 10 z E Q � co cn DESIGN PEAK FLOW FOR ONE-HALF OF STREET OR GRASS -LINED CHANNEL BY THE RATIONAL METHOD Project: Starbucks - 32nd Ave 8 Youngfield St Inlet ID: I I Basin Al - DP 4 i —�W O { STREET I E L ROW O 1 GUTTER FLOW GUTTER PLUS CARRYOVER FLOW Show Deteb ROADWAY CENTERUNE Mlnpr Stone Maler Slone (io�al oaali now for lrz or svact OR press encd on,nneil 'O = 0 82 1 80cfs If -o enter v;�lu�=s in Row 14, ski the rest of this sheet and el --d to sheet Q -Allow or Aro, Inlet. eogra Onn n: nter oma in me bIjece Snt lmrn ctert Area - Acres Srta 7 Pecten! Impero rvusness = % ype: f-Iwrs Darlaptd Far: NRCS Soil Type = A. B, C. or D O Site . tkban I 0 Stied Inle, Slope (IVft) Length (It) O Site is Non -Urban O Area Ink, in a Median Ove land Fbw = Channel Fbw = Design Storm Rehm Period, T, Return Period Ore -How Precipitation P, C, —i— User-Defined Stone Runoff Coefficient (leave this blanc to accept a ,aic sated value).C = User -Defined Snoff yr. RuCoelfiment (leave this blame to accept a calcltated value)- C6 = Bypass (Carry -Over) Flow from upstream Subcat.....w ta,4 0.0 0.0 cfs Total Design Peak Fbw, Q O.L2 t,s0 cis IN THIS SECTION IN THE (IONS BELOW. Basin Al - INLET.xism, Q -Peak 1115!2015, 5:29 PM INLET ON A CONTINUOUS GRADE Project: Starbucks - 32nd Ave & Youngfield St Inlet ID: Basin Al - DP 4 I-- Lo (C) �r H -Curb H -Vert Vlb W (G) Basin Al - INLET.xlsm, Inlet On Grade 8/5I2015, 5:29 PM MINOR MAJOR ype or Intel Type = Denver No. 16 Valley Grate Local Depression (additional to continuous gutter depression'a' from'O-MloW) a, ,,. = 2.0 inches Total Number of Units in the Inlet (Grate or Curb Opening) No = 1 Length of a Single Unit Inlet (Grate or Curb Opening) Lo = 3.00 it Width of a Unit Grate (cannot be greater than W from Q -Allow) W. - 1.73 tt Clogging Factor fora Single Unit Grate (typical min. value = 0.5) C -G = 0.50 p,SD Clogging Factor (or a Single Unit Curb Opening (typical min. value = 0 1)Street Hydraulics OK -Q � maximum allowable f MINOR l Int Total Inlet Interception Capacity O = 0.65 5 cfs Total Inlet Carry -Over Flow (flow bypassing inlet) Q> 0.2 IMAJOR cfs Capture Percentage = Q,/Q, = 60 % Basin Al - INLET.xlsm, Inlet On Grade 8/5I2015, 5:29 PM DESIGN PEAK FLOW FOR ONE-HALF OF STREET OR GRASS -LINED CHANNEL BY THE RATIONAL METHOD Project: Starbucks - 32nd Ave & Youngfield St Inlet ID: Basin A2 - DP 3 OVERLAND ` STREET I OVERW D FLOWGUTTER FLOW_ LOW GUTTER PLUS CARRYOVER FLOW 77 Show Details ROADWAY CENTERLINE tbcal peek flow for 1l2 of street OR grassirwd ci—el). ies In Row 14, skip the rest of this sheet and D—eed to slwet O -AN,. or A- 561 Type: Flows Developed For — Q Site is Q Street le "' Q site 6 Npn Urtlan Q Med folds in a Medan cfsFILL IN THIS SECTION S,bIrripe ens Area Acres Percent lnperviousness = q NRCS Soil Type = A. B. C. or D Slope ItUft) Length (fl) OvedaM Flow = Charnel Fbw = Design Stom Rehm Period, T, = years Return Period One-Hov Precipitation, P, = Inches C,= Cr = C,= User -Defined Storrs Ruoff Coefficient (leave this Waris to wept a r laJated value), C - User -Defined Syr. Ruoff Coefficient (leave this blanc to accept a uilwated value). Cs = Bypass (Carry -Over) Flow from ups"am Subcatchenents, Clb = 0.0 0.0 Cf. Total Design Peak Flow. p =1 1.69 1 4.12 ds IN THE TIONS BELOW. Basin A2 - INLET.xlsm, O -Peak 815{2015, 5:30 PM II INLET IN A SUMP OR SAG LOCATION Project = Starbucks, - 32nd Ave b Youngfield St Inlet ID = Basin A2 - DP 3 X Lo (C)--4' HCurb H -Vert Wo W WP Lo (G) Type of Inlet ( ocal Depression (addrtlooal to cornmuum gutter depression's' fromI~ Number of Unit Inlets (Grate or Curb Opening) Water Depth at Flomme (outside of to al depression) Grate Inlormation Length of a Unit Grate Width of a Unit Grate 4rea Opening Ratio for a Grate (typical values 0.15-0.90) Clogging Factor for a Single Grate (typical value 0.50 - 0.70) irate Weir Coefficient (typpcal value 2.15 - 3.60) irate Onfim Coefficient (typical value 0 60 - 0.00) -urb Opening Information -ength of a Unit Curb Opering ieight of Vertical Curb Opening in Inches �eigM of Curb Orifice Throat in Inches kngle of Thmal (see USDCM Figure ST -5) fide Width for Depression Pan (typically the gutler width of 2 feet) :bgging Factor for a Singie Curb Opening (typical value 0.10) :urb Opening Weir Coefficient (typical value 2.3-3.7) :urb Opening Onfim Coefficient (typical value 0.60.0.70) MINOR MAJOR filet Type = Wheat Ridge Combination TZ = 2.00 No -1 1 Ponding Depth =1 6.0 9.1 riches riches O.emde De,'th4 al Inlet Interception Capacity (assumes clogged condition) �. Capacity IS GOOD for Minor and Major Storms (>O PEAKI Ovcir acouaco Basin A2 - INLET. Asm, Inlet In Sump 815/2015, 5:30 PM MINOR MAJOR Lo (G) - 2.75 feel W. 1.37 feet A— - 0.65 C, (G) = 0.50 0.50 C. (G) - 3.60 C. (G) 0.67 MINOR MAJOR L. (C) = 2.66 feet H— = 6.00 inch K_ = 5.25 inch, Theta = 0.00 degr W.= 2.00 feet C,(C)= 0.10 010 C. (C) = 3.60 Co (C) = 0.67 MINOR MAJOR al Inlet Interception Capacity (assumes clogged condition) �. Capacity IS GOOD for Minor and Major Storms (>O PEAKI Ovcir acouaco Basin A2 - INLET. Asm, Inlet In Sump 815/2015, 5:30 PM DESIGN PEAK FLOW FOR ONE-HALF OF STREET OR GRASS -LINED CHANNEL BY THE RATIONAL METHOD Project: Starbucks - 32nd Ave & Youngtield St Inlet ID: Basin A3 - DP 2 LWD I SIDE I 7OVER�LMAND FOW STREET W ` GUTTER FLOW GUTTER PLUS CARRYOVER FLOW --'Show Details ROADWAY CENTERLINE If lineal Peak flow for 112 of street OR grass hood cr-i) res in Row 14, skip the rest of this sheet and proceed to sheet Q -Allow or Area cis IFILL IN THIS SECTION Sntxapervior Area =�% Percent Irrperv,ousAcres ress = q, S4 Type: Flows DL,,kped For: NRCS Soil T [00 YPe - A. B, C, or D OSite K urban Street In etSbpe (fVtq Length (ft) O See s Non-Uroan Arca In et n a M W an Overland Flow = Channel Flow = na rBi int = , t c Miror Storm Malor form ' Design Storm Ream Period, T, = years Return Period OnwHour Precipitatwn, Pr = iron C,= 1 1 User -Defined Storm Runoff Coefficient (leave Iris blank to accept a cakxtlated value), C = User-Defired SoH Coefficient yr. Ru,oeciera (leave Ihs blank to accept a caladat(d value). C. -0 Bypass (CwTyver) Flow from upstream Subcatchents, 1�6 0.0 1 0.0 cfs Total Desgn Peak Flow, Q =1 0.89 1 1.65 cis IN THE TIONS BELOW. Basin A3 - INLET.xlsm, O -Peak 816/2015, 10:21 AM INLET ON A CONTINUOUS GRADE Project: Starbucks - 32nd Ave & YoungTield St Inlet ID: Basin A3 - DP 2 r— Lo (C) —� H -Cb WWII! Wo W o (G) Design t n I MINOR MAJOR Type of Inlet Type Wheal Ridge Combination Local Depression (additional to continuous gutter depression 'a' from'Q-AIIoW) au, 2 2.0 inches Total Number of Units in the Inlet (Grate or Curb Opening) NO = 1 Length of a Single Unit Inlet (Grate or Curb Opening) L, = 2.75 If Width of a Unit Grate (cannot be greater than W from Q -Allow) We 1.37 R Clogging Factor for a Single Unit Grate (typical min. value = 0.5) C'G = 0.50 0.50 CI ging Factor for a Single Unit Curb Opening (typical min. value = 0.1) CrC = 0.10 0.10 Street Hvdraulilowable- MINOR MAJOR Total Inlet Interception Capacity Q = 0.66 1.10 cts Total Inlet Carry -Over Flow (flow bypassing inlet) Qc = 0.0 0.3 cfs Capture Percentage = 0.10. = CSL = % 76 x Basin A3 - INLET.xlsm. Inlet On Grade 8!6!2015. 10:22 AM 0+95 1+00 1+05 1+10 1+15 1+20 1+25 1+30 1+35 1+40 1+45 1+50 1+55 1+60 1+65 1+70 1+75 1+80 1+85 1+90 1+95 2+00 2+05 2+10 2+15 2+20 2+25 2+30 2+35 2+40 2+45 2+50 2+55 2+60 2+65 2+70 2+75 2+80 2+85 Node ID. Rim (ft): Invert (ft): Mm Pipe Cover (ft). Max HGL (ft). Link ID: Length (ft) Dia (in): Slope (ft/ft): Up Invert (tt) D Invert (ft): Max Q (cfs): Max Vel (ft/s]: Max Depth (It): °o F 5 -YEAR W „ STORM 1 5,526.5 o ------------- 5,526 n o - — - ----- ------ ----- -- ----- -- ----- ------ 5,525.5 co N v� ---------------- 5,525 0 a _-____ 5,524.5 b ----------- ;____._,______ _____ ____ ______ -___ S,S24 --------------------------------- - ---• ----- --- --- --------- --- ----- --- --- ---------- ---- ----- --- ---- ----- -- ------ F N 5,523.5 _ .. -_. .., 5,523 - -----1 -- ------- ------------ ----- ---- ------- ---- ; Link ID {STORM).PIPE1.3 -----`-----',------N o 5,522.5 Length122.95tt ---- --- ----- ----------- ' ° W n 5,522 Dia 15.00 in ---: A o, 5,521.5 �ti-------- ----- -.---- --- ----- . Slope 0.0228 ft1ft ; , v r N N Up Invert 5519.48 tt - -` '-----=� �- 1-- •-----'----- 5,521 DnInvert 5516.68tt___,______ 5,520.5 • ------------------- ---- o H 0 5,520a > 5,519.5 ------•-----'------------'- - F w Lu 5,519 ------------- v _ u n 5,518.5 - - - - ..'- - _ _ _ - - - _ _ Link ID (STORM).PIPE1 .2 Nn 5,518 -- - - - - - - - - ; _ .. - - - LDa04000nength 40.55 tt Link ID (STORM ).PIPE1 .1 0 -i - - - - - Length 20.00 tt 5,517.5 -- _ ----:---- 1 ----- in a 5,517 _. _ -'_ . _ _ _ _ ---- - UpI npvert 5514 70 H ope ft a m 5,516.5 � - - _ _ - - - - - Dn Invert 5514.50 tt Up Invert 5514 30 ft 2 G - .- - --- •--- -. _;..-_ _� - - ------ --; .__ _ .. Dnl vert5514.07tt H 5,516 ---- ------ -, _.. -- --.- --- -- -- - ------ --- S,S15.5 -- ----- -' 5,515- ---- ----- -- . _ 5,514.5 ---- - 5,514 _, .. -, --- - 5,513 - 0+95 1+00 1+05 1+10 1+15 1+20 1+25 1+30 1+35 1+40 1+45 1+50 1+55 1+60 1+65 1+70 1+75 1+80 1+85 1+90 1+95 2+00 2+05 2+10 2+15 2+20 2+25 2+30 2+35 2+40 2+45 2+50 2+55 2+60 2+65 2+70 2+75 2+80 2+85 Node ID. Rim (ft): Invert (ft): Mm Pipe Cover (ft). Max HGL (ft). Link ID: Length (ft) Dia (in): Slope (ft/ft): Up Invert (tt) D Invert (ft): Max Q (cfs): Max Vel (ft/s]: Max Depth (It): 5,523 5,522.5 5,522 5,521.5 5,521 5,520.5 5,520 5,519.5 5,519 5,518.5 Lu 5,518 5,517.5 5,517 5,516.5 5,516 5,515.5 5,515 5,514.5 5,514 Node ID: Rim (ft): Invert (ft): Min Pipe Cover (ft): Max HGL (ft): Link ID: Length (ft): Die (in): Slope (ft/ft): Up Invert (ft): On Invert (ft): Max Q (cfs): Max Vel (ft/s): Max Depth (ft): N w O N uu) F 00 .N Vl N 'M p H ~ N O v u) N L* M m N .t°a rra -- --------- -- ---_- — — ___—.. _ x a Link ID (STORM).PIPE2.2 Length 33.50 ft Die 15.00 in Slope 0.0051 ft/ft Up Invert 5515.70 ft Dn Invert 5515.53 ft 5 -YEAR STORM 2 F ~ -------------- .y u m F O 1 :. N N N N u _-._.-.. -- ---------- -------- ------- --- — -- --------- - ______.. --------- N ---------- ------------- ---- -- --------------- --- r ---------- -------------------- ---------- ------------------ --------- ----------------- - -- ----1- Link ID {S1;ORM}.PIPE2.1' -- ----- LWW 74-.40 if ------- ------ - - Dfe 19.00 In ------------- —------------------ ---- saw f99511tfft- --------- --- --- -- Up hvert 5515.29 ft , -Dn Inved 661 4aO ft- ---------- --------------------------- 1+00 -------- --------- - 1+00 1+05 1+10 1+15 1+20 1+25 1+30 1+35 1+40 1+45 1+50 1+55 1+90 1+95 1+70 1+75 1+80 1+85 1+90 1+95 2+00 2+05 2+10 Node ID: Rim (ft): Invert (it): Min Pipe Cover (ft): Max HGL (ft): Link ID: Length [it): Dia [in): Slope (ft/ft): Up Invert (ft): On Invert [it): Max Q (cis): Max Vel (ft/s): Max Depth (It): o H 100 -YEAR 07i2912' 1'5 00:05 C-; w STORM 1 5,526.5 `� �J 01 ' - 5,526 i 5,525.5 _ ----- _ __._. 5,525 '" w ` 5,5245 n o H� 5,524 r F4 " • _ _ _ _ - . _ _ 5,523.5 5,523 ,D �--�� -- Link ID {STORM).PIPE1 5,5225 - - - - _ Length 122.95 tt o 5,522 ----- — --------------------- --- - --- —I; Dia 15.00 in -- 5,521.5 -- - - Slope 00228Wit Up Invert 5519 48 ft `—�- ' nf 5,521 ------------------------------- --- ------ Dn Invert 5516,68 tt _-- — F`--- �--_-�--- - wa 5,520.5 --- ----- ---- 5.520--1--- ---- --_ — --------------_-�- -�-�--^-- -- ---- ------ --- ---- ---- -_ ahoNM4A ° 1:3 H 19 5,519.5 ; --'---- ---- w-- 5,519 -- ---'- --- w..- 5,518.5 ----:----- :--- :__.__,__,___. - Link ID{STORM}.PIPE1.2 , 5,518 _____________ ---=--- � ---- ------ ---- ------ Length 40.55 tt Link ID(STORM)PfPE11 5,517.5 ----- ------ -- ---------- --- — Dia 24.00 in — SlopeO.00SOttltt Length20.00ft ° 5,517 -- ------- ----- --- ----------- Up Invert 5514.70 tt - - - - - Dia 24.00 in Slope 0.0117 ft/ft o a a — — — Dn Invert 5 4 51 SO tt — Up Invert 5514-30' it x G 5,516 - — — Dn Invert 5514.07 ft H 5,515.5 --- ---- - ----- ----------- ----- -- ------ — — --- ---- - - - --- _. 5,514.5 --- --- ----- --- ----- --- ---- ----- — 5,514 — — ,-- — ------ -- ------ 5,513.5 ---- ---: — -- — -- ' 5,513 - - - 0+95 1+00 1+05 1+10 1+15 1+20 1+25 1+30 1+35 1+40 1+45 1+50 1+55 1+60 1+65 1+70 1+75 1+80 1+85 1+90 1 +95 2+00 2+05 2+10 2+15 «., 2+20 2+25 2+30 2+35 2+40 2+45 2+50 2+55 2+60 2+65 2+70 2+75 2+80 2+85 Node ID: Rim (ft): Invert (it): Min Pipe Cover (ft): Max HGL (ft): Link ID: Length [it): Dia [in): Slope (ft/ft): Up Invert (ft): On Invert [it): Max Q (cis): Max Vel (ft/s): Max Depth (It): Node ID: Rim (ft): Invert (ft): Min Pipe Cover (ft): Max HGL (ft): Link ID: Length (ft) Dia (in): Slope (ft/ft): Up Invert (ft): Dn Invert (ft): Max Q (cfs): Max Vel (ft/s): Max Depth (ft): TM 2.2 (STORM) STM 2.1 (STORM) 100 -YEAR 5519.98 5519.43 5521.05 5515.51 STORM 2 5515.07 0 5,523 3.03 2.65 3.12 =' 3i 5,522.5 5516.51 5515.87 (STORM).PIPE2.2 -' m (STORM).PIPE2.1 o' r» 33.50 74.40 �n v o w 5,522 w 18.00 0.0051 N 1) '•'� F 5515.70 A N 1-1 Vl 5,521.5 N ""n Ln H 01 H 5515.53 NoD .� 5514.90 b A r" 5,521 m�.' 6.36 r -- ----- -- 2.76 w - - 4.58 0.94 _ 5,520.5 ,� � w of h H J Ln ---�„t- 5,520 5,520 -------_------------------_ 41 Go- o C -------- - -` _.._--------- - - --- - -------- ----- ____ ---------- -- ------------- ------- 5,519 ----------9----------'r------- --------- -------- - ------h-------------i- 5,518.5 _ ----------------------------- Link ID (STORM).PIPE2.2 ; s'1 Length 33.50 tt Lk* D (S7PF M)JWM.1; ; Lu5,518 Die 15.00 in ; _ _ --------r--- �-----------r-----•--- ---------- ----------+-- L 7X 40 if , -----F - Slope 0.0051 ttJtt Ole 18.00 In ; 5,517.5 Lip Invert 5515.70tt ;----- -• ----------; Stopeb.0051ftft------------------------------------ --------- ; Dn Invert 5515.53 ftUp Invert 5515.28 R ; 5,517 --------- DnInvert 6514.901t, -------------- -------- 5,516.5 5,516 5,515.5 5,515 5,514.5 5,514 1+00 1+05 1+10 1+15 1+20 1+25 1+30 1+35 1+40 1+45 1+50 1+55 1+60 1+65 1+70 1+75 1+80 1+85 1+90 1+95 2+00 2+05 2+10 Sfwti- fffl Node ID: Rim (ft): Invert (ft): Min Pipe Cover (ft): Max HGL (ft): Link ID: Length (ft) Dia (in): Slope (ft/ft): Up Invert (ft): Dn Invert (ft): Max Q (cfs): Max Vel (ft/s): Max Depth (ft): TM 2.2 (STORM) STM 2.1 (STORM) 5519.98 5519.43 5521.05 5515.51 5515.07 5514.49 3.03 2.65 3.12 5516.64 5516.51 5515.87 (STORM).PIPE2.2 I (STORM).PIPE2.1 33.50 74.40 15.00 18.00 0.0051 0.0051 5515.70 5515.28 5515.53 5514.90 2.23 6.36 2.76 4.58 0.94 1.09 STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY SITUATED IN THE SE 1/4, NW 1/4 SECTION 29, T 3 S., R 69 W OF THE 6TH P.M. CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO FINAL DRAINAGE PLAN rt 3 ri- PIPELINE (30" 0. CONC. PIPE) � � c vv wry . rHly PROP. RETAINING/_ SCREEN WALL I PROP. 2' ROW DEDICATION (BY SEPARATE DOCUMENT) R=39.50' L=61.78' .. VICINITY MAP FWY 0 LU W 44TH AVE 38TH AVE' 32ND AVE 26TH AVE 20TH AVE NORTH (1) NTS NORTH Design Point Basin Name_ Area (Acres) C5 C1oo Sterling Design Associates, Ilc Total Runoff Q5 (CFS) Q1oo(CFS) Q5 (CFS) Q100 (CFS) 2009 W. Littleton BJvU. #300 BI 0.13 0.75 Littleton, CO 80120 CONNECT EXIST. 1.05 303.794.4727 ph DOWNSPOUT TO PROP. A3 www.SteilingDesignAssociates.coni INLET WITH 4" O PVC 0.84 0.69 1.45 2 A3+61 { - PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF - 75 ~ - 1.16 OWEN' KEITH KEENAN, PE 0.13 A2 0.53 COLORADO REGISTRATION 47677 0.73 83 3.66 FOR & ON BEHALF OF STERLING DESIGN ASSOCIATES, LLC WHEAT RIDGE - A'?+A3+81 COMBINATION INLET- �' 2.80 PRELIMINARY 4 A 1 0.24 0.67 EXIST. 0.82 1.80 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION VACANT BUILDING 5 Al+A2+A3+B1 AJ _ �_ 3.36 218 .76 OS1 0.14 0.76 0.84 0.54 84 0.54 1.42 7 0S2 0.01 0.34 0.58 - STERLING DESIGN ASSOCIATES, LLC 'TORM MH #6 8 OS3 �El MASTER DRAINAGE REPORT APPLEWOOD 0.15 0.50 0.01 'HOPPING CENTER ODP AMENDMENT #9 PREPARED BY r_ slues s REVISIONS "IMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, FEBRUARY 16, 2015, NO.: t DATE 08/07n5 BY OKK ZEVISED MARCH 17 2015. DESCRIPTION: LAYOUT REVISIONS & REVISE PER CITY COMMENTS 6 NO.: 2 DATE: BY DESCRIPTION: _.... �� .j, ; NO.: 3 DATE: BY. • -',. L ®,; DESCRIPTION: `f3 NO. 4 DATE BY DL3M_.1�... -.. DESCRIPTION: _. NO, 5 NO.: . DATE gy OFFSITE STORM SEWER CONTINUATION ASSOCIATED WITH THE MASTER DRAINAGE REPORT APPLEWOOD DESCRIPTION SHOPPING CENTER ODP AMENDMENT #9 PREPARED BY ' NO s DATE BY KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, FEBRUARY 16, 2015, DESCRIPTION: REVISCD MARCH 17,;2015. ,,, ... __. __.. _. ...... ..,.,'... _. _... ____... DATE: SCALE. 03/25/15 1" = 20' PROJECT MANAGER: PROJ ECT NO.. OKK DRAWN BY: DRAWING FILE: NORTH Design Point Basin Name_ Area (Acres) C5 C1oo Direct Runoff Total Runoff Q5 (CFS) Q1oo(CFS) Q5 (CFS) Q100 (CFS) 1 BI 0.13 0.75 0.83 0.50 1.05 2 A3 0.18 0.76 0.84 0.69 1.45 2 A3+61 { -_- - ~ - 1.16 2.15 3 A2 0.53 0.62 0.73 1.63 3.66 1.70 4.12 3 A'?+A3+81 - 2.80 6.17 4 A 1 0.24 0.67 0.78 0.82 1.80 "`- 7� 5 Al+A2+A3+B1 _ �_ 3.36 7.18 _ 6 OS1 0.14 0.76 0.84 0.54 1.12 0.54 1.42 7 0S2 0.01 0.34 0.58 0.02 0.08 8 OS3 0.02 0.15 0.50 0.01 0.08 r_ AlBASIN DESIGNATION A 1 1.26 60 5 YR RUNOFF COEFFICIENT 100 YR RUNOFF COEFFICIENT BASIN AREA (ACRES) DRAINAGE BASIN DIVIDE LINE DIRECTIONAL FLOW ARROW G \ DESIGN POINT 9M PROJECT CP. } • 3210 YOUNGFIELD STREET WHEAT RIDGE, C DEVELOPER: STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY 2401 UTAH AVENUE SOUTH SEATTLE, WA 98134 wtvi FINNISHSHEET TITLE'. FINAL DRAINAGE PLAN SHEET NUMBER: 1 Sterling Design Associates, Ilc CIVIL ENGINEERS - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Variance Request Letter Date: August 7, 2015 To: Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Department 7500 W. 29th Ave. 2nd Floor Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 From: Owen Keenan, PE — Sterling Design Associates RE: Variance Request for the Youngfield Street Build -to Line Starbucks Drive-Thru at Applewood Village Shopping Center PGD 12755 W. 32nd Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 This letter is to serve as a formal request for a 10 -foot administrative variance to the Youngfield Street build -to line on behalf of Regency Centers, L.P. for the development of a Starbucks cafe with drive-thru. The site as designed only requires an 8.2 -foot variance to the build -to line, however, up to a I 0 -foot variance can be granted administratively and would allow for adequate building placement within the variance. It is the intent of Regency Centers, L.P. and Starbucks Coffee Company to redevelop a portion of the southwest corner of the Applewood Village Shopping Center into a 2,500 square foot Starbucks Cafe with drive thru and associated parking. The City has allowed a drive-thru facility to be located on site through a Special Use Permit (Case No. SUP -13-04). The approval of the Special Use Permit also included an administrative 10 -foot variance to the 20 -foot build -to line for the site that is located in the Contemporary Overlay Area within the City of Wheat Ridge. Regency Centers had acquired the property with this 10 -foot variance in place. The original variance (Case No. WA -13-18) was granted on December 13, 2013 and has since expired. The site property has been subject to numerous Right -of -Way dedications along W. 32nd Avenue and Youngfield Street due to the recent intersection improvements. Approximately 30 - feet of the original south property line has been dedicated as W. 32nd Avenue Right -of -Way. In addition, 10 -feet of the original west property line has been dedicated as Youngfield Street Right -of -Way. It is anticipated that an additional 2 -feet and 6 -feet will be dedicated at a future date along W. 32nd Avenue and Youngfield Street, respectively. The narrow site dictates an east -west orientation of the building with the drive-thru lane on the north side. A two-way drive aisle is preferred along the west side of the building to improve the overall traffic circulation of the site by eliminating "dead end" parking as well as allowing access to alternative site exits for all site patrons. The variance is requested to accommodate the two- way drive aisle along the western portion of the building. Jay M. Newell, PE Wayne T. Sterling, RLA, LEED AP 2009 W. Littleton Blvd. #300 Littleton, CO 80120 303.794.4727 ph www.SterlingDesignAssc,dates.com �c Sterling Design Associates, Ilc CIVIL ENGINEERS - , ANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Listed below is the City of Wheat Ridge variance review criteria as contained in Section 26-1 15 of the municipal code as well as responses on behalf of Regency Centers. L.P and Starbucks Coffee Company. A. The property in question would not yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located. Response: The site could be developed without the variance; however, the variance will allow for increased traffic circulation to accommodate all patrons of the Starbucks site. The site is constrained by ingress and egress points and without the variance, the overall site circulation would be significantly diminished and may discourage use due to the difficulty of entering and the limited options of exiting the site. The variance will allow for increased traffic circulation around the proposed building that would provide two main features increasing traffic circulation: The "dead-end" parking area would be eliminated by the two- way travel lane around the building connecting to the right -out onto Youngfield Street. 2.) Drive-thru patrons would be offered connectivity to the site's exit onto W. 32nd Avenue and the Applewood Shopping Center to the north. B. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: In a past variance approval (Case No. WA -13-18), the City has acknowledged that the proposed building setback will be consistent with the existing building locations to the north and south of the development. C. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property with this application, which would not be possible without the variance. Response: The applicant is proposing improvements associated with the development of a Starbucks Cafe with Drive-Thru. The site is currently underutilized as vacant land. Due to past and future Right -of -Way dedications, the site is constrained by the shape of the site as well as design standards within the Contemporary Overlay area. Without the variance, a drive-thru will not be best suited for the site. Additional circulation around the building is desired by both Regency Centers and Starbucks that offers patrons interconnectivity to additional ingress/egress points as well eliminating "dead-end" parking. Jay M. Newell, PE Wayne T. Sterling, RLA, LEED AP 2009 W. Littleton Blvd. =300 Littleton, CO 80120 303.794.4727 ph www.SterlingDesignAssociates.com Sterling Design Associates, Ilc CIVIL ENGINEERS - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS D. The particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved results in a particular or unique hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out. Response: Due to past and future Right -of -Way dedications, the site is constrained by the rectangular shape of the property and especially the shallow north -south depth and will face development challenges. The site is also faced with limited ingress and egress points with restricted turning movements. Although the site could be developed without the variance, it would result in the site being underutilized and therefore a poor investment. The alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having interest in the property. Response: The hardship was created by constraining the site with past and future Right -of -Way dedications resulting in reduced site area and limiting the ingress and egress points of the site. Providing patrons with the appropriate on-site traffic circulation creates a situation in which there in an inability to meet the 20 -foot build -to line requirement contained in the Architectural and Site Design Manual. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located, by, among other things, substantially or permanently impairing the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or substantially diminishing or impairing property values within the neighborhood. Response: In a past variance approval of the subject property (Case No. WA -13-18), the City has acknowledged that the variance will not have a detrimental effect upon the general public health, welfare and safety of the surrounding areas. Granting the variance will not permanently impair the development of adjacent property or impair the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property. With the variance, the existing building to the north would have approximately the same setback distance as the proposed building. Granting the variance will have a positive effect on property values, and the aesthetics of the property will be greatly improved. G. The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are present in the neighborhood and are not unique to the property. Response: Existing buildings located on properties to the north and south of the site appear to be consistent with a 30 -foot building setback off of Youngfield Street. Jay M. Newell, PE Wayne T. Sterling, RLA, LEED AP 2009 W. Littleton Blvd. "300 Littleton. CO 80120 303.794.4727 ph www.SterlingDesignAssociates.com Sterling Design Associates, Ilc CIVIL ENGINEERS - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS H. Granting of the variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities. Response: Granting of the variance would not affect persons with disabilities. This item is not applicable. I. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual. Response: The proposed Starbucks site is consistent with the Architectural and Site Design Manual. An alternate site design complying with the 0 to 20 feet build -to line along Youngfield Street would sacrifice on-site traffic circulation and severely hinder the serviceability of the site to Starbucks patrons. Poor traffic circulation and limited points of ingress and egress could discourage use. Due to the narrow north -south configuration of the site, the only option to increase traffic circulation is to route two-way traffic around the building adjacent to Youngfield Street. This improvement to circulation necessitates the need for the variance. It is Regency Centers and Starbucks desire to eliminate the "dead end" parking while providing drive-thru users access to additional points of egress. Should additional information be required, please feel free to contact me directly at 303-794- 4727 ext. 206. Sincerely, Owen Keenan, PE Civil Engineer Sterling Design Associates Jay M. Newell, PE Wayne T. Sterling, RLA, LEED AP 2009 W. Littleton Blvd. #300 Littleton, CO 80120 303.794.4727 ph www.SterlingDesignAssociates.com Kimley»>Horn May 28, 2015 Mark Westberg, P.E., CFM, Project Supervisor City of Wheat Ridge 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 RE: Applewood Village Redevelopment NEC of 32 "d Avenue and Youngfield Street Intersection Wheat Ridge, Colorado Traffic Impact Study Comment Response Letter Dear Mr. Westberg: Thank you for the City of Wheat Ridge review comments for the Applewood Village Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study. The Applewood Village Redevelopment (King Soopers Fuel Center & Starbucks) is located within the Applewood Village retail center located on the northeast corner of 32nd Avenue and Youngfield Street intersection. The following provides an item by item response to comments related to the traffic study prepared for this project: City of Wheat Ridqe Comments Executive Summary Review Comment: The executive summary will need to be revised to reflect the comments made elsewhere in this memo Applicant's Response: Understood, as applicable Review Comment: Page 2 — The 15' paragraph mentions new trips that are attributable to the King Soopers Fuel Center, but does not mention new trips that are attributable to the Starbucks. Applicant's Response: According to the Trip Generation Manual Handbook, 9th Edition, Gasoline Service Station (ITE Code 944) has pass -by trips and Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive Through (ITE Code 937) does not. This paragraph talks about new trips (after pass -by). Therefore, new trips were mentioned for the King Soopers Fuel Center and not for the Starbucks. All trips to the Starbucks are considered new trips and previously discussed. Existing Roadway Network Review Comment: Page 8 — The 4"' paragraph states that the western full movement access along 32"1 "primarily provides access", it would be more accurate to state that this alley access "only provides access". Applicant's Response: Understood. The revised traffic study will state that, "The western full movement alley access along 32"1 Avenue only provides access to a loading and delivery area presently." Trip Generation Review Comment: Page 18 — The 3'd paragraph allocates 10% of the Starbucks trips to center, however, the Starbucks site does not connect with the center, so internal capture is not possible. Applicant's Response: Yes, we agree there is no direct internal connection between the Starbucks and Applewood Village. This 10 percent distribution to and from Applewood Village to Starbucks was applied to the external street network. This is illustrated in Figure 9. Drn.com' 4t)bz soutn ulster Street butte 1 bUU Denver. CO 80237 1303 228 230C Kimley>>> Horn Page 2 Review Comment: Page 19 — The percentage of pass -by trips for the Fuel Center should be stated. Applicant's Response: The percentage of Pass -by trips for the King Soopers Fuel Center will be stated in the revised traffic study. Gasoline Service Station (ITE Code 944) has pass -by percentages of 58 percent in the morning, 42 percent in the afternoon. In addition, the afternoon peak hour (42 percent) pass -by percentage was assumed for the Saturday midday peak hour. Review Comment: Page 19 — The 1 " paragraph states that pass -by trips were not allocated to the Starbucks. A relatively high percentage should be allocated since this will likely happen. There are several studies in- line with ITE manuals that showed a relatively high percentage of pass -by trips. Applicant's Response: This is definitely possible, but the current ITE Trip Generation Manual and ITE Trip Generation Manual Handbook do not have studies that pertain to Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive Through (ITE Code 937) for pass -by trips. Therefore, a pass -by percentage was not applied. Assuming no pass by percentage provides a conservative analysis because all vehicles are assumed new to the surrounding street network. Review Comment: Page 19 — Table 1 is confusing. The bottom row should be "Total Trips". An additional row should be added for "Total External Trips". Applicant's Response: We are only concerned with external trips, which is the total trips generated by the projects. Table 1 shows all trips after internal capture, which is appropriate. These trips were calculated after the 40 percent internal capture rate was applied for trips to and from the King Soopers Fuel Center. The 10 percent of trips being generated to and between Applewood Village and Starbucks was not applied for this table. This is because the 10 percent of trips generated to and from Applewood Village to Starbucks will use the external street network. Review Comment: Page 19 — The following additional summary tables would be helpful: 1. Table showing total number of trips generated. Applicant's Response: Table 1 on page 19 shows the total number of generated trips after internal capture and broken down into pass -by and non pass -by. This is the relevant traffic volume. If desired, trips prior to internal capture could be provided, but it would be informational only as that volume is not used in any calculations. Table showing reduction for internal capture and revised totals. Applicant's Response: This can be added to the revised traffic study if needed. Again, these volumes aren't typically reported as they aren't generated external to the project, therefore not relevant. Trip Distribution Review Comment: Page 20 — Discussion should be included in this section concerning the internal capture for the Fuel Center. Additional figures should be added to illustrate the changes in the trip distribution. The following should be incorporated in that discussion: 1. Most, if not all, of the internal capture trips for the Fuel Center related to the King Soopers will likely visit the Fuel Center after shopping. Applicant's Response: This is accounted for in the 40 percent internal capture from Applewood Village, 30 percent internal capture to and from the King Soopers supermarket and 10 percent from other uses. 2. Because of the difficulties in navigating the high pedestrian traffic areas in front of either the King Soopers or Applejacks entrances, the majority of those internal capture trips will likely use the 32nd main access to exit the site. 303 228 2300 Kimley>>> Horn Applicant's Response: Understood and applied. PagF 3 Review Comment: Page 21 — On Figure 9 the following adjustments should be made: 1. It seems unlikely that traffic from Applewood Village would exit left onto Youngfield, then left onto 32nd, then left at the alley access to get to the Starbucks. That 5% should be added to the trips exiting right onto 32"° at the 32r1 main access then turning right into Starbucks. Applicant's Response: Understood. The movement as described will operate acceptably with two right turns. We applied some traffic to left turns to provide a more conservative analysis for any drivers who may choose to access the site from Youngfield Street. This can be adjusted if needed. 2. Since the alley access will not allow a SB left turn, those trips should be assigned to the 32"d main access SB left turns. Applicant's Response: The developer of the project would like for tis alley access to allow full turning movements. Cross access isn't provided so that traffic isn't able to access the 32nd main access in the current configuration. Review Comment: Pages 25 and 26 — The trips shown on Figures 13 and 14 will need to be adjusted to reflect the changes to Figure 9. Applicant's Response: Understood. Review Comment: Pages 31 thru 34 — The trips shown on Figures 19 thru 22 will need to be adjusted to reflect the changes to Figure 9 and any impact of the shift of the internal capture trips to the 32" main access. Applicant's Response: Understood, if appropriate modifications are needed. Key Intersection Operational Analysis Review Comment: Page 36 — Because the Youngfield traffic signals are part of a coordinated system, the actual signal timing for those signals should be used in the analysis, not an optimized timing. Applicant's Response: We concur. Actual timing data was obtained and used for the signalized intersections along Youngfield Street as observed during the peak hour traffic counts. We apologize for the confusion. Review Comment: Page 36 - The HCM is stated as the method used to analyze the intersections. Using this method is not adequate, the proximity of the proposed intersections requires that a micro -simulation technique be used. The simulation needs to analyze the closely spaced intersection and access points for any queues. potential blockage and other traffic behaviors which may negatively affect the operation along 32nd particularly along the southern frontage of the development. Applicant's Response: The traffic study was prepared using Synchro, which evaluated everything as a street network. The Synchro traffic analysis software was used to analyze the study area intersections and access drives for level of service. The Synchro Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology reports were used to report the intersection level of service. This is just the method of reporting the level of service. In other words, the reports in Synchro are HCM reports. Review Comment: Page 36 — The LOS for the individual movements for the 32011 & Youngfield intersection should also be included in Table 3. Applicant's Response: The LOS for individual movements for the 32nd & Youngfield intersection will be added to Table 3 in a revised traffic study. We are most concerned in the average delay for all drivers through the intersection and strive to reduce this delay as much as possible. It is acceptable to allow few drivers long 4582 South Ulster Street. Suite 1500. Denver, CO 80237 303 228 2300 Kimley>>> Horn Page 4 delays so that many drivers experience very little delay. Therefore movement delays can be deceiving, but this can be provided if desired. Review Comment: Page 37 — The 2"d paragraph discusses the need to continue to have the 32"d alley access be a full movement access to serve the Starbucks, which will not be allowed due to the significant safety issues created. Left turning movements will not be allowed because of the close proximity to the 32"d main access EB left turn lane and the 32"d & Youngfield WB left turn lanes. This traffic would be better served by an internal access to a new traffic signal at the 32nd main access. WB right -in movements will provide good access to the drive thru. Signage should be provided showing preference for this access for the drive thru. Applicant's Response: We believe that a full movement access along 32"d Avenue can work operationally and safely. Review Comment: Page 37 — The 2" paragraph also mentions having two outbound lanes for the alley access. As discussed above, the SB left -out movement will not be allowed. Applicant's Response: It is understood if the left turn out is restricted, then just a single right turn lane exiting would be all that's needed. Review Comment: Page 39 — The 151 and 2nd paragraphs anticipate the diversion of traffic from the 32"d main access to the Youngfield signalized access because of the expected delays. This is not an acceptable solution to the expected delays at the unsignalized 32nd main access for the following reasons: 1. Increases the traffic that is required to travel through the high pedestrian traffic areas in front of either the King Soopers or Applejacks entrances. Applicant's Response: Without a traffic signal at the 32n° Avenue Main Access, traffic will naturally divert during peak hours so that they don't experience long delays. 2. Increases the left turn traffic at the existing signal at the Youngfield signalized access which already exceeds the allowable queue length during the 2016 pm peak. Applicant's Response: Understood. 3. Increases the left turn traffic at the existing signal at 32"d & Youngfield. Applicant's Response: Yes, understood. 4. Increases the EB thru traffic on 32"d main access thereby causing additional delays at that access. Applicant's Response: Understood. Review Comment: Page 39 — A signal warrant analysis must be done for the 32nd main access because of the poor LOS and excessive queues. Applicant's Response: Based on existing traffic volumes, a traffic signal is warranted. A traffic signal has likely been warranted at this intersection for the past several years, with previous Applewood Village densities and development. Review Comment: Page 43 — The LOS for the individual movements for the Youngfield signalized access should also be included in Table 8. 4582 South Ulster Street Suite 1500. Denver. CO 80237 W=303 228 2300 Kimley>>> Horn Page 5 Applicant's Response: The overall delay is more applicable for evaluation of signalized intersections, but movement level of service can be provided as well. Intersection Queuing Analysis Review Comment: Page 45 — The following changes should be made to Table 10: 1. The queues for all movements at all of the intersections should be included. Applicant's Response: Understood 2. The existing lane length for the WB thru/right movement at the Youngfield signalized access should be included. Applicant's Response: Understood 3. The WB left turn lane at the Youngfield signalized access does not extend into the drive aisle as noted in the footnote. Applicant's Response: One assigned lane extends into the drive aisle, as the westbound queuing will collect onsite. Review Comment: Page 45 — The following issues are noted in Table 10: 1. Since the queue length of the SB left at the 321111 main access exceeds the available turn lane length for both the left and right turn lanes for 2016 and 2035, the SB right turn movement will also experience similar excessive delays. Applicant's Response: The amount of delay on the southbound right turn volume is reported in the level of service tables. That is where the delays are identified, not within the queueing tables. 2. Since the queue length of the WB left at the Youngfield signalized access exceeds the available left turn lane length for 2016 and 2035.. the WB thru/right will experience additional delays. This would be further exacerbated if trips divert from the 32" main access as suggested in the study. Applicant's Response: This amount of delay is reported in the operational tables and they account for this volume and queuing. Review Comment: Page 46 — The 2nd paragraph discusses the design for an EB left turn lane for the alley access. The WB left turn lanes cannot be shortened. The 32"' & Youngfield intersection has been designed to accommodate large amounts of additional traffic from the development site west of 1-70 and the eventual relocation of the WB 1-70 ramps to the south. Applicant's Response: Based on existing traffic volumes, it is believed that the westbound left turn lanes lengths can be reduced. Conclusions and Recommendations Review Comment: Several of the conclusions and recommendations will need to be revised to reflect the comments made elsewhere in this memo. Applicant's Response: Understood. It seems as though there are three requested modifications: first that the alley access be restricted to right turn movements only; second that shared access exists between Starbucks and Applewood Village; and third that the 32" Avenue main access be signalized. Review Comment: Given the complexities of the ongoing redevelopment for the Applewood Village Shopping Center, the traffic study and analysis, access design, and internal traffic patterns should be 4582 South Ulster Street Suite 1500. Denver. CO 80237 Kimley>>> Horn Page 6 analyzed comprehensively for the long term layout and design for the entire south half of the center. Designing access and potential changes to the street network for just the beginning phases of a major redevelopment will likely result in safety and congestion issues as noted in these comments. Applicant's Response: Understood Appendix D — Intersection Analysis Worksheets Review Comment: As noted previously, the traffic signal at 32" & Youngfield is part of a coordinated system. The actual timing for the signal should be obtained from the City and used for the modeling Applicant's Response: The actual timing for the signalized intersections along Youngfield Street were incorporated into the analysis, obtained from actual observations of operations of the traffic signal. Review Comment: As noted previously. the HCM is not adequate to analyze the intersections because of their close proximity and the long queue lengths. A micro -simulation analysis should be done. Applicant's Response: This is a misunderstanding. A micro -simulation software, Synchro, was used for the analysis. HCM is the methodology of reporting the results. It really just provides the level of service definitions. Possibly the confusion is from HCS, Highway Capacity Software. That is an isolated intersection evaluation tool. That was not used in this analysis or traffic study. Appendix E — Queuing Analysis Worksheets Review Comment: The queues for several turning movements at the 32nd & Youngfield intersection show that they exceed the available capacity. This appears to be in error. Applicant's Response: Queue results are based on actual timing of the intersection. Review Comment: The WB right at the 32"1 & Youngfield intersection appears to be the longest queue for the weekday pm. This needs to be shown on Table 10. Applicant's Response: Additional movement queues can be provided in the table as requested. Please contact me at (303) 228-2304 or Curtis. RoweCa�kimley-horn com should you have any questions or require anything further. Sincerely. KIMLY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. /UIrltD. Rowe. P.E.. PTOE Vice President 1 4582 South Ulster Street Suite 1500. Denver. CO 80237 We are residents of Hoyt Court, and are concerned about how the addition of home in that spot will impact our neighborhoods' springtime flooding. For the last several springtimes, when my sons and I attempt to hike outside of the concrete in the area where the home will be built, we are unable. The ground is simply too dense with standing water. We were not surprised, then, that the home would be build on a great amount of fill dirt. (Yes, we will be saddened by what suchlike home height and size will do to the neighborhoods' aesthetic.) Given that the City of Wheat Ridge doesn't deploy state -of -the art technologies to protect residential and recreational areas surrounding Clear Creek from flooding, this run-off area is essential. If must be protected and allowed to serve the function it serves today! We were surprised, that a family with children plans to live in a home without a fence. We regularly deal with coyotes in that immediate area of the greenbelt, in the autumn and winter. In fact, the volume of wildlife that transits back and forth through the creek area, is more than we'll likely ever get used to! Overall, we'd like to voice our opposition to any development there. We can't see how the city could ensure that its development would not have negative consequences on the beauty of the area, the seasonal flooding that impacts the usage trail and surrounding low-lying neighborhoods, and the ecosystem there. We would also like to comment, that we were dismayed that the engineer representing the would-be homebuilder was anything but unbiased. We expected a list of pros and cons, especially of the technical nature. We also hoped he would represent both the interests of the existing neighbors and city, but also that of the homeowner. Instead he was unabashedly, for the development and we couldn't seem to discern why! It is indeed time for Wheat Ridge, to stand up for what it wants to be. It no longer has to say `yes' to any poorly -devised idea for development. The city and its citizens are in a position to define what our look, our identify, our priorities will be as a city. Please, stand up for one of the few great assets to our city — the recreational pathway that links the Rec Center, key parks and many residents to nature and wildlife. Ensure its usable year round and oppose the initiative to build too close to it! Thank you. Sincerely, Heather Walszek Dave Brossman From: Chekal, Eric <EricChekal@RegencyCenters.com> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 1:19 PM To: Meredith Reckert Cc: Dave Brossman; Mark Westberg Subject: RE: AWV plat Please see my responses below in red. Thanks, Eric From: Meredith Reckert [mailto:mreckert(d)ci.wheatridQe.co.us] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 9:17 AM To: Chekal, Eric Cc: Dave Brossman; Mark Westberg Subject: AWV plat Hi, Eric Just trying to follow-up our conversation from this morning. I think it would be a marvelous idea for Curtis and Mark W. to speak regarding the modifications to the Starbucks traffic issues. I left message for Curt this morning to call both Mark and me. I hope that happens today. With regard to the proposed plat, there currently is no Lot 3. Lot 3 is being created from a portion of the Lot 1 which extends up to 38th Avenue. Also, there needs to be a legitimate access for Lot 3 — presumably by an access easement that extends from 32nd to 381h Avenue. The goal of the consolidation plat is to eliminate lot lines and some unnecessary easements. It was cleanest to create a lot (Lot 3) for the ground lease with Kings for the fuel center. We can then do an easement to 32nd or an easement agreement for this lot to use the rest of the center for access, parking, etc. If this is not acceptable to the City I expect we can still vacate the lot lines and create a larger Lot 1 then do a ground lease metes and bounds legal for the Kroger lease. Regarding the ATM, please forward designs from Dick when you receive them. He is finishing it up today. Before I send it Wells will need to look at it. You will get it before Thursday's meeting. Finally, we have never recorded the Outline Development plan for the center. You are correct, sorry. What do you need mylars and money? Is there a date this needs to happen by? Meredith Meredith Reckert, AICP Senior Planner 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Office Phone: 303-235-2848 FAX: 303-235-2857 www.ci.wheatridse.co.us City of " �Wh6atF,idge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 291h Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 May 1, 2015 Eric Chekal Regency Centers 8480 East Orchard Road Suite 6900 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 Dear Mr. Chekal: This letter is in regard to an application filed for approval of a Specific Development Plan for property zoned Planned Commercial Development (PCD) located at 12755 W. 32nd Avenue. The application has been reviewed and the following are comments regarding the first submittal. SHEET ONE 1. Make sure the top border is at least 1" in width for the recording information. 2. Modify the title to read as follows: "Starbucks Drive-Thru — Applewood Village Shopping Center PCD An Official Development plan in the City of Wheat Ridge ................." The title should be carried out for the entire plan set. 3. Remove the agency referral information 4. In the Character of Development statement, remove the reference to "approved by a special use permit". 5. The square footage and acreage figures should all be the same and should reflect what is shown on the plat. 6. In the lot coverage portion of the table, modify the category under Open Space/Landscaping category from "sod" to "living landscaping". 7. In the Open Space/Landscaping category does the number for hardscape reflect non -living landscaping (uncovered patios, internal sidewalks, etc) or hard surface coverage on the property? I would suggest a separate category (not included in the landscape calculation) be named hard surfaces which would include parking, drives and other hard surfaces. The figures for Building coverage, Open space/Landscaping and hard surfaced coverage should equal total lot area. 8. In the Site Data Table, remove the category for net area. 9. Below the table, remove the note referencing net area. 10. In the Site Data Table, indicate that the gross lot area includes right-of-way reservations for 32nd Avenue and Youngfield. H. Under the Site Data table, reference the recording date of the Applewood Village Shopping Center Outline Development Plan. 12. Add a note indicating address of property is 12755 W. 32nd Avenue 13. Add a case history box with the following case numbers: SUP -13-04, WZ-14-09, WZ-15- 02, MS -15-01 14. Remove the note indicating "Preliminary — not for construction". 15. Modify the signature block for Planning Commission as they will be the reviewing authority. 16. Modify the City signature block per redlines. SHEET TWO 1. Remove the note indicating "Preliminary — not for construction". 2. Remove the "Notice to Contractor" note. 3. Are any freestanding signs proposed? If so, the location and sign detail should be shown. 4. Indicate material for parking spaces. 5. Specify the material for the screen wall. Staff would support brick, but not CMU. 6. If the 0' to 20' build -to cannot be met, a variance request should be included with the application. SHEET THREE 1. The property owner indicated that the 12755 W. 32nd Avenue address was to be used for the property. If this is the case, please remove the reference to the Youngfield address. 2 On both building facades, add maximum square footages for the signs shown. 3. Add a building materials summary for each fagade using percentages. 4. Add a transparency summary for each fagade using percentages. 5. On the western fagade, designate the question labels on the patio roof. 6. Remove the Exterior Elevation Notes. SHEET FOUR 1. On both building facades, add maximum square footages for the signs shown. 2. Add a building materials summary for each fagade using percentages. 3. Add a transparency summary for each fagade using percentages. 4. On the western fagade designate the question labels on the patio roof. 5. Remove the Exterior Elevation Notes. 6. With regard to the wall signs on the eastern elevation, typically wall signs are allowed on building walls which face a street or major interior drive. Please provide justification for the wall signs on the eastern facade. LANDSCAPE PLAN 1. Sheet 1,101 of the civil construction plan set needs to be incorporated into the SDP plan set. It should be given the same title and renumbered consistent with the other sheets. 2. Remove the note to contractor on the bottom left corner of the sheet. 3. Remove the note indicating "preliminary". 4. In the Landscape Data, the minimum landscape coverage is 10%. The figures should be adjusted accordingly. 5. The figures in the Landscape Data table should match the front sheet. 6. Add a note that all living landscaping shall be served by an automatic, zoned irrigation system. PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 1. Sheet 1,101 of the civil construction plan set needs to be incorporated into the SDP plan set. It should be given the same title and renumbered consistent with the other sheets. 2. Remove the note to contractor on the bottom left corner of the sheet. 3. Remove the note indicating "preliminary". Attached are referrals received from other city departments and outside agencies regarding the Specific Development Plan. Colorado Department oj' Transportation: See attached letter from Steve Loeffler dated April 14, 2015. 2 Consolidated Mutual Water: See attached letter from Zach Queen dated March 31, 2015. Northwest Lakewood Sanitation District: See attached letter from Bill Willis dated March 31, 2015. Wheat Ridge Fire Protection District: See attached letter from Kelly Brooks dated April 14, 2015. Wheat Ridge Police Department: See attached email from Kevin Armstrong dated March 30, 2015. Wheat Ridge Public Works: See attached letter from Dave Brossman dated April 10, 2015 and correspondence from Mark Westberg dated May 14, 2015. Xcel Energy: See attached letter from Donna George dated April 13, 2015. Additional referral comments may be forthcoming and will be forwarded. This concludes the summary of comments. Please address each of these comments by revising the drawings accordingly. For clarification on any of these issues, please feel free to contact any of the Development Review committee members: Community Development Meredith Reckert 303-235-2848 Public Works Dave Brossman 303-235-2864 Traffic Engineering Mark Westberg 303-235-2863 Once changes have been made, please submit one 24" x 36" copy and one 11" x 14" copy of the revised documents. Include an electronic copy with a PDF document and an AutoCAD dwg (2010 or older) including all external reference and shx files, etc. If you have any questions or need further clarification, do not hesitate to contact me at 303-235-2848. Sincerely, Meredith Reckert, AICP Senior Planner 0 H0 CL VO OW a O W x p Q r0 V=DLLZ X LA- 3°g Z0�Na H o� o W u�- Vo -Wa Ld zo o Z H W D W zr�� 'CL Z;Lo' u �gZW_ �a�oLL. I7Z W wwai �x QOW3 O ]CW�V m� � W Z N F D O Z Q I LL Y v� 'AWB F 0 6 I > % C ! QaQt L O f l U w OE Cf I5 n oWP a, 1- � 4 11[ X01m�Wd � LL c ° asaa '4'i 4 7. saw 6 3� ■H� .aqi d 1$1fl$t ae YYYi cY IV. iY 911 bRIN'bb; $ m § U eb bbage [' a ~ f m :4 Ea�gr� r ,i�� y � ZIu 0H Z??5 S' v p �mma z 02200 y n m � � n �y 'AWB Ewe° �a$, 0 6 I > QaQt 8 U I D Cf I5 n oWP a, 1- X01m�Wd � N e EE HIM; Oa c ° asaa '4'i 4 7. saw 6 3� ■H� .aqi d 1$1fl$t ae YYYi cY IV. iY 911 bRIN'bb; $ m § U eb bbage [' a ~ f m :4 Ea�gr� r ,i�� y � ZIu 0H Z??5 S' v p �mma z 02200 y n m � � n �y L Ewe° �a$, i� 6 I > 8 €8 I r I D Cf I5 �3.,da EE HIM; W I L H3iasg€ � Fp O w ,r �4c •Bai aL a8 1b8agaR 6 y°i sh muJ H ji `b KqYk ac $ 0Dsi$�[xa fig a eQ4r $$•.��='nuc e�pagtlD t'°s 1 F•� it D6k3�n�[ [��-�.� Z aL LG w V F *a p b, §['•^t � a: J C1 Ga;; Q br ,7�., INN ¢9i Z �a?iiiq: >€�a@� V �Yoy*bF �' $�'c5e€Se ?'$,IM! ag f r k 6 °s REP 1,6t� iig 9 =_k . 0 i s i da' vui '.. N Q 6 N .I� YYYY Edi. LL REP z 0 W N Q 6 N I- 1YQo 8 u N I I I I i 2=;N I W - - �____ uj. ova' Sym Q bR, I yy W V a Y sig E I- I yy W V a I- I I> I/ I I I I i - I W - - �____ 1 ' -J s bR, a 4' r ■ r t 0".. g$ U< 33kft 14 .1 _ _ _t. 0 F- O J WO Eu CL ui J UJ aO L'J Qu7�o =o Z R 31 �0 0� W u�r W=oo 0 Ld J gZ=�o :5u =IL~lu �— W W W 2� H f Z- 0 W 0 �U W J Vl �- D 0 Z Q -Pw—w M pq[ NlIBSjIUMa1WA3M LlS W"a 1N 3eroro P.w —, w —Ma z u� o A1Nnoo NOSN3d=i3f W rf o �11 Evooe oo '3oaw 1v3HM 11 j a3a1S a13IJE)NnoA mic p g ;aoava ai3i�0Nnoma�a - NZC lie y .1 _ _ _t. 0 F- O J WO Eu CL ui J UJ aO L'J Qu7�o =o Z R 31 �0 0� W u�r W=oo 0 Ld J gZ=�o :5u =IL~lu �— W W W 2� H f Z- 0 W 0 �U W J Vl �- D 0 Z Q -Pw—w M pq[ NlIBSjIUMa1WA3M LlS W"a 1N 3eroro P.w —, w —Ma w ®�F LL €4� i o>wa @ i 4 1 AIMS, yai1a r 6,5� F A 5 y�� p 5 M o,�ag�a m 0� A Z t y LL .lLNn00 NOS213j3Q3f N w �► w !s1 CCOOR 00'3001b IV3HM ! 13381S o131d0Nnon olze O g66 j i ss3uam i�3roue 41313�NflO l 9 ONZ£ a s o b $ 3.rvH.a3rone g a b E' j w a ZHhh NN ytl�8pp554E€5pp all 1 10 M, 11i loll z a sg 8$ 9r • �'� ��A 5 x e _. s 0 p a z� 3 c w0&t 5 r a m 8 ► 0`l'CL 5 a ?�=o° b 6ab4 d5 76 i a• gZ sm�9 35 o�owN�t� U UrLLa p Lu w=o'yy� O b b b Z Z �F > gZ`oo s � gZwv w�u w ww > Z_ z3 a pp°o V)LL, -� a U LLJ mp i' 03 LLJ QZ p O Q .i s Z 0 Qy � WN.�wA pw NLC%neswii.N»�IWn3N L1S'JNLNVtg1N3NXlYJ SNBLLIv�LItIImNwd l./pilpM�A IW t�80'L SIpLOLiL / | LLI \� $ Nk 0 0 Z -1 �� 2 2 Oƒ ± �zk k m�§ IA -Z LLI i0 0 ��l3 UO'�gE O -1 CL z )\Ld CLZ-0 = §iW �ClaLL - Lu �37§OV-) k0 � -j<6 �0�° <LLIZ V/ a O Z < |!; | _` / § moms r. § I| {I�$| ea c 2_IV3 _ e _a . maoa (11gBON no ,a 2)t�/| !ƒ � CCCONSOLIDATED mutual water 00 March 31, 2015 City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Ms. Meredith Reckert 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Re: Case Number WZ-15-02 — 3210 Youngfield Street and 12755 West 32nd Avenue Dear Ms. Reckert: This will acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated March 30, 2105, regarding the above referenced properties. Please be advised that the above referenced properties are in an area served by the Consolidated Mutual Water Company. Domestic water service may be provided to these properties subject to compliance with the Company's rules, regulations and requirements for such service. The Company's rules, regulations and requirements further require that each separate structure be served by a separate tap and meter, and in order to receive domestic water service, the property must also front a Company main. Fire protection requirements should be obtained from Wheat Ridge Fire District and those requirements forwarded to this office by the Fire District at the earliest possible time. We can then determine if additional system improvements would be required to meet the demands set forth by the Fire District. THE CONSOLIDATED MUTUAL WATER COMPANY 12700 West 27th Avenue • P.O. Box 150068 • Lakewood, Colorado 80215 Telephone (303)238-0451 • Fax (303)237-5560 City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Ms. Meredith Reckert March 31, 2015 Page 2 If you should have any questions or comments regarding this correspondence, please contact this office. Sincerely, 2 Zach Queen Superintendent of Distribution cc: Kelly Brooks, Fire Marshall, Wheat Ridge Fire District Michael Queen, CMWCo President Andy Rogers, CMWCo Project Engineer Kim Medina, CMWCo Tap Administrator Meredith Reckert From: Loeffler - CDOT, Steven <steven.loeffler@state.co.us> Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 1:49 PM To: Meredith Reckert Subject: MS-15-01/Starbucks Consolidation Meredith, I have reviewed the submittal request for a two -lot consolidation plat on property zoned PCD located at 3210 Youngfield and have the following comment: • Any signing for this business that advertises to Interstate 70 must be on -premise in nature and can only advertise goods or services available on that property. Thank you for the opportunity to review this submittal number listed below, or reply to this email. Steve Loeffler Permits Unit D If you have any questions, please contact me at the the P 303.757.9891 1 F 303.757.9886 2000 S Holly Street, Denver, CO 80222 steven.loeffler@state.co.us I www.coloradodot.info I www.cotrip.orQ Orr MARTIN/MARTIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS March 31, 2015 Meredith Reckert City of Wheat Ridge Community Development 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge CO 80033 Email: mreckert@ci.wheatridge.co.us Re: NWLSD — Starbucks SDP — WZ-15-02 Martin/Martin, Inc Project No.: 15700.C.01 Dear Ms. Reckert, On behalf of the Northwest Lakewood Sanitation District (NWLSD), Martin/Martin Inc., acting as the District Engineer, offers the following in response to the referenced referral dated March 30, 2015 concerning a request for approval for a Specific Development Plan regarding a drive-through Starbucks restaurant at 3210 Youngfield Street and 12755 W. 32"d Avenue. Sanitary sewer service is available for the proposed Starbucks subject to the following conditions. The subject lot at the address referenced above is entirely within the boundary and service area of the Northwest Lakewood Sanitation District. Treatment of sewage generated within the Northwest Lakewood Sanitation District is provided by Metro Wastewater Reclamation District (Metro). Existine Sanitary Sewer Main NWLSD has an 8 -inch diameter sanitary sewer running west to east along W. 32nd Avenue south of the proposed development. Regardless of the design connection point to the sanitary collection system, the Developer will be responsible for verifying the sanitary sewer main elevations/inverts to determine if the proposed site can be serviced via gravity mains or if a private lift station will be required. All costs associated are the responsibility of the developer/owner. Please provide any information regarding food production/heating processes. NWLSD will determine any requirement for a grease interceptor. Plans and Costs All costs involved — engineering, reviews, design, construction, observation and inspections — are the responsibility of the Owner/Developer. Please be aware that proper tap and development fees are required to be paid prior to connection to the District main. A minimum 72 -hour notice prior to construction is required following District receipt of all fees. These fee amounts can be paid directly to the District Office prior to connection. Any tap, engineering review fees, district attorney fees, and managerial services are the responsibility of the owner/developer based on the then current fee rate structure. A copy of the District's rules and regulations are available upon request. Any questions regarding this document, please contact us at (303) 431-6100. Sincerely, Bill Willis, PE Cc: AJ Beckman—SDMSI, Inc. Tim Flynn — Collins, Cockrel, Cole MARTIN/MARTIN, INC. 12499 WEST COLFAX AVENUE LAKEWOOD, COLORADO 80215 MAIN 303.431.6100 MARTINMARTIN.COM Meredith Reckert From: Kevin Armstrong Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 5:01 PM To: Meredith Reckert Cc: Kevin Armstrong Subject: RE: Starbucks Applewood SDP Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Meredith, The police department has no objections to this project. Scrgcan[ Kc pin Arms[roW Cnmc Prevcn[ion 7cam Wlica[ Ride Policc Dcpar[mcn[ 7500 W. 2.9[h Avcnuc Wbca[ Ridgc, Colorado 80033 Olrcc Phonc. 303-235-2.927 Rax- 3032,��2.949 karmslronR ci. whcaf idgc.co.us 1I City of Wheat �dge POLICE DEPARTMENT CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail contains business -confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, electronic storage or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, attaching the original message, and delete the original message from your computer, and any network to which your computer is connected. Thank you. From: Meredith Reckert - Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 11:52 AM To: Kevin Armstrong Subject: Starbucks Applewood SDP Dear Kevin, The Wheat Ridge Community Development Department has received a request for approval of a Specific Development Plan at 3210 Youngfield and 12755 W. 32nd Avenue (Case No. WZ-15-02). Please download the application documents from the City drive: Starbucks Applewood SDP Folder: V:\Community Development\ Land Use Case Referral File name: Starbucks Applewood SDP WHEAT RIDGE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT DOING THT RIGHT THINGS AT THE RIGHT TIMES FOR THE RIGHT REASONS 3880 Upham Street Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 • ph.303.403.S900 • www.wrfire.org DIVISION OF FIRE PREVENTION April 14, 2015 Meredith Reckert City of Wheat Ridge Community Development 7500 West 29th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 RE: Community Development Referral CASE No.: 3210 Youngfield and 12755 W. 32nd Avenue - WZ-15-02/ Starbucks SDP The Wheat Ridge Fire Protection District has reviewed the Community Development Referral and has the following comments regarding our ability to serve this property: 1. A Commercial Site Planning Guide is attached and should be provided to the applicant. All requirements established in the Commercial Site Planning Guide.. as well as the 2012 International Fire Code and IFC amendments adopted by the City of Wheat Ridge shall be met unless approved by the Division of Fire Prevention. 2. While we have no concerns regarding our ability to serve the property. specific site requirements including water supply/hydrant locations, site access, building configuration. site infrastructure, etc, may require fire department review and approval. The applicant is encouraged to request fire department input at the earliest reasonable opportunity. Based on the plans provided: Additional water supply (fire hydrant) is required along Youngfield Street. Contact the Consolidated Mutual Water Company for additional information. Access to the property via the private drive does not appear to comply with dimension requirements of the fire code. Please review the attached Commercial Site Planning Guide and the City of Wheat Ridge amendments to the 2012 International Fire Code for additional Information. 3. The applicant should be made aware that the proposed project may require one or more Fire Department permits: It is the responsibility of the property owner/tenant to verify that all required Fire Department permits are acquired. Please feel free to contact me if there are any questions or concerns with respect to this review. Reviewed by. Kelly Brooks Fire Marshal Wheat Ridge Fire Protection District XcelEnergysm PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY April 13, 2015 City of Wheat Ridge Community Development 7500 West 291h Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Attn: Meredith Reckert Re: Applewood Starbucks, Case #s MS -15-01 and WZ-15-02 Right of Way 8 Permits 1123 West So Avenue Denver, Colorado 80223 Telephone: 303.571.3306 Facsimile: 303. 571.3660 donna.I.george@xcelenergy.com Public Service Company of Colorado (PSCo) has reviewed the plat and site development plans for Applewood Starbucks, acknowledges the 10 -foot easements noted in the standard easement language paragraph, and requests they be shown on the plat. PSCo also requests that the following language or plat note be placed on the preliminary and final plats for the subdivision: Permanent structures, improvements, objects, buildings, wells, water meters and other objects that may interfere with the utility facilities or use thereof (Interfering Objects) shall not be permitted within said utility easements and the utility providers, as grantees, may remove any Interfering Objects at no cost to such grantees, including, without limitation, vegetation. Public Service Company of Colorado (PSCo) and its successors reserve the right to require additional easements and to require the property owner to grant PSCo an easement on its standard form. Please be aware PSCo owns and operates existing natural gas and electric distribution facilities within the proposed project area. The property owner/developer/contractor must contact the Builder's Call Line at 1-800-628-2121 and complete the application process for any new gas or electric service or modification to existing facilities. It is then the responsibility of the developer to contact the Designer assigned to the project for approval of design details. Additional easements may need to be acquired by separate document for new facilities. As a safety precaution, PSCo would like to remind the developer to call the Utility Notification Center at 1-800-922-1987 for utility locates prior to construction. If you have any questions about this referral response, please contact me at (303) 571-3306. Donna George Contract Right -of -Way Referral Processor Public Service Company of Colorado City of _�qrWheat �idge PUBLIC WORKS Memorandum TO: Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner FROM: Dave Brossman, Development Review Engineer DATE: April 10, 2015 SUBJECT: WZ-15-02/ Starbucks SDP, Plat, Drainage Letter, & Civil Construction Plans I have completed my first review for the request for approval of a Specific Development Plan to allow a drive —through restaurant in a Planned Commercial Development (PCD) zone district at 3210 Youngfield and 12755 W. 32nd Avenue received on March 30, 2015, and 1 have the following comments: PLANNING & ZONING: Specific Development Plan General Comment: 1. To -date no traffic information has been received. Public Works may have comments affecting the SDP upon review of the Traffic Impact Study. Final Plat General Comment: 1. ALL text on plat sheets must be a mininnun of 1/8" in height. Sheet l: 1. The title of the overall Applewood Village Shopping Center will in all likelihood be the same or very similar to what is currently shown as the title of this plat. I recommend this plat be named "Starbucks-Applewood SC", or something similar. 2. Please add the following subtitle: "A CONSOLIDATION OF PREVIOUSLY UNPLATTED PARCELS". 3. Please include the following Note: "7. AREAS SHOWN HEREIN AS "FUTURE RIGHT-OF-WAY" ARE HEREBY RESERVED FOR FUTURE DEDICATION TO, OR PUBLIC ACQUISITION BY, THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE TO BE COMPLETED AT A LATER DATE BY SEPARATE DOCUMENT." 4. Please the Case History Box with Case No. WZ-15-02. Starbucks_?210 Youngfleld_Ist Review.docx Public Works Engineering April 10, 2015 Page 2 Sheet 2: 1. Please identify the existing Right -of -Way lines on the plan view and in the Legend. 2. Please note the following: a. Per Sec. 26-410-C of the Municipal Code of Laws, section ties to two (2) different property corners are required. b. No proposed easements are currently shown on this plat. Bearings and distances of all proposed easements are required. 3. Provide the Reception # (90013512) for the area of ROW within W. 32nd Avenue (refer to the redlined plat as needed). 4. Please include the curve data for the future ROW line at the SW corner of the subject property. This line and data will then be shown on the larger, overall Applewood Village Shopping Center plat mentioned above. 5. In order for the two existing parcels to become consolidated into one larger parcel, you must show the existing parcel line and include the following notation: "PARCEL LINE HEREBY REMOVED BY THIS PLAT". 6. Show the Book & Page or Reception Numbers of the two parcels being consolidated. This information should be in a lighter or shaded font than the current name ("Lot 1, Starbucks-Applewood SC", or whatever they wish to call it). 7. There is an easement to abut the exterior of the boundary along the northeasterly portion of the subject property. Please include the type, width, and JeffCo Reception#. 8. Include a 15 foot -wide Drainage Easement centered on the proposed storm sewer, 9. Need to identify the Basis of Bearing line (e.g., S. Line of NW 1/4 of Section 29). 10. Provide the bearing (S 89029'29" W) for the given section tie. 11. Please add the ROW and Future ROW linetypes to the Legend. CIVIL ENGINEERING: Drainage Letter: 1. In the P paragraph on page 1: a. Include FEMA before the Zone X in the first sentence. b. Correct the typo in the second sentence. 2. In the 2nd paragraph, page 2, describe the ultimate destination of the overflow runoff and any potential negative impacts resulting from these additional flows. 3. Upon completion of the above corrections, please include one wet -stamped hardcopy and a PDF file containing the signed & sealed revised Letter with the next submittal for Public Works approval. Drainage Plan: I . In the two references to the Master Drainage Report by Kimley-Horn, please include the revision date of Rev. March 17, 2015. 2. Upon completion of the above corrections, please include one wet -stamped hardcopy and a PDF file containing the signed & sealed Plan with the next submittal for Public Works approval. Starbucks -3210 Youngfield_ I st Review.docx Public Works Engineering April 10, 2015 Page 3 Construction Plans C 100 (Cover Sheet): I . Please modify my information and add the information for our Stormwater Coordinator under the "Agency Referrals" list. 2. Please include this Note at the end of the Wheat Ridge General Notes: "20. NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR: IF MORE THAN THREE (3) STREET CUTS OCCUR WITHIN 250 LINEAR FEET, ADDITIONAL MILLING/OVERLAY REQUIREMENTS WILL APPLY. REFER TO THE TERMS OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE ROW CONSTRUCTION PERMIT (THAT MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, 303.235.2861, PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK)." C201 (Site Plan): 1. The ADA ramp on the east side of the full -movement drive from W. 32nd Avenue ("Entrance 3") must be constructed with this project. C303 (Street Profiles): 1. Please include this Note at the end of the General Notes: "21. NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR: IF MORE THAN THREE (3) STREET CUTS OCCUR WITHIN 250 LINEAR FEET, ADDITIONAL MILLING/OVERLAY REQUIREMENTS WILL APPLY. REFER TO THE TERMS OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE ROW CONSTRUCTION PERMIT (THAT MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, 303.235.2861, PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK)." 2. The ADA ramp on the east side of the full -movement drive from W. 32nd Avenue ("Entrance 3") must be constructed with this project. C304 (Street Details): 1. Please include the following City -standard details: S-E01_HMA.DWG (Typical Asphalt Detail) C404 (Erosion Control Details): 1. Please remove the City of Aurora details for the Rock Socks. C501 (Utility Plan): 1. Please include this Note at the end of the General Notes: "6. NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR: IF MORE THAN THREE (3) STREET CUTS OCCUR WITHIN 250 LINEAR FEET, ADDITIONAL MILLING/OVERLAY REQUIREMENTS WILL APPLY. REFER TO THE TERMS OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE ROW CONSTRUCTION PERMIT (THAT MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, 303.235.2861, PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK)." Starbucks -3210 Youngfield_Ist Review.docx Public Works Engineering April 10, 2015 Page 4 C503 (Storm Profile & Details): 1. The pipe profile should be reversed to correspond to the plan views on all the other sheets (west being on the left, east on the right). ADDITIONAL: 1. Right -of -Way Construction Permits)/Licensing: a. ROW Permits. Prior to any construction within the public right-of-way (ROW), the necessary Right -of -Way Construction Permit(s) and respective licensing will need to be submitted for processing by the City. Right -of -Way Construction Permits are issued by the City only after approval of all required technical documents, including but not limited to, the Final Drainage Report & Plan, Final Plat, Final Development Plan, Traffic Impact Study, Storm Sewer Plans, Street Construction Plans, Grading & Erosion Control Plan, Traffic Control Plan, and easement or ROW dedications. b. Licensine. All work within the public Right -of -Way shall only be performed by a municipally -licensed contractor. 2. Drainage Certification Letter with As -Built Plans: Upon completion of the drainage improvements, the Engineer -of -Record Mr. Owen Keenan, P.E., shall provide to the City of Wheat Ridge a written, signed and sealed Drainage Certification Letter stating that the site grading was completed per the approved Drainage Plan, that the site conforms to and shall function as defined in the approved Final Drainage Letter, and that the site has been accurately surveyed to confirm that the grading was completed in accordance with these documents. Prior to Final Approval by Public Works and issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy, the Drainage Certification Letter shall be submitted to the City for review and approval and be accompanied by As - Built Plans containing sufficient elevations in support of said Letter. Three (3) conies of the "As -Built" Plans are to be submitted as follows: a. 1 hardcopy is to be on full-size 24" X 36 " bond paper, signed and sealed, AND b. 2 copies are to be on electronic media: one (1) file in AutoCAD DWG format and one (1) file in PDF format. The above comments are as of the date reviewed and may not reflect all comments from other departments or reviewing agencies. If you have any questions, please contact me at 303.235.2864. Sincerely, David F. Brossman, P.L.S. Development Review Engineer/City Surveyor CC: Steve Nguyen, Engineering Manager File Starbucks_3210 Youngfield_Ist Review.docx City of heat Rjdge PUBLIC WORKS Memorandum TO: Meredith Reckert, AICP, Senior Planner FROM: Mark Westberg, PE, CFM, Project Supervisor DATE: May 14, 2015 SUBJECT: Applewood Village Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study — April 2015 — I" Review I have completed my review of the Traffic Impact Study dated April 2015 for the proposed redevelopment of Applewood Village at the northeast corner of 32nd Avenue and Youngfield Street. I have the following comments regarding this submittal: 1. Executive Summary a. The executive summary will need to be revised to reflect the comments made elsewhere in this memo b. Page 2 — The 1 S` paragraph mentions new trips that are attributable to the King Soopers Fuel Center, but does not mention new trips that are attributable to the Starbucks. 2. Existing Roadway Network a. Page 8 — The 4th paragraph states that the western full movement access along 32nd "primarily provides access", it would be more accurate to state that this alley access "only provides access". 3. Trip Generation a. Page 18 — The 3'd paragraph allocates 10% of the Starbucks trips to center; however, the Starbucks site does not connect with the center, so internal capture is not possible. b. Page 19 — The percentage of pass -by trips for the Fuel Center should be stated. c. Page 19 — The 1 S` paragraph states that pass -by trips were not allocated to the Starbucks. A relatively high percentage should be allocated since this will likely happen. There are several studies in-line with ITE manuals that showed a relatively high percentage of pass -by trips. d. Page 19 — Table 1 is confusing. The bottom row should be "Total Trips". An additional row should be added for "Total External Trips". e. Page 19 — The following additional summary tables would be helpful: i. Table showing total number of trips generated. ii. Table showing reduction for internal capture and revised totals. 4. Trip Distribution a. Page 20 — Discussion should be included in this section concerning the internal capture for the Fuel Center. Additional figures should be added to illustrate the changes in the trip distribution. The following should be incorporated in that discussion: Applewood Traffic Study May 14, 2015 Page 2 i. Most, if not all, of the internal capture trips for the Fuel Center related to the King Soopers will likely visit the Fuel Center after shopping. ii. Because of the difficulties in navigating the high pedestrian traffic areas in front of either the King Soopers or Applejacks entrances, the majority of those internal capture trips will likely use the 32"d main access to exit the site. b. Page 21 — On Figure 9 the following adjustments should be made: i. It seems unlikely that traffic from Applewood Village would exit left onto Youngfield, then left onto 32"d, then left at the alley access to get to the Starbucks. That 5% should be added to the trips exiting right onto 32"d at the 32"d main access then turning right into Starbucks. ii. Since the alley access will not allow a SB left turn, those trips should be assigned to the 32nd main access SB left turns. c. Pages 25 and 26 — The trips shown on Figures 13 and 14 will need to be adjusted to reflect the changes to Figure 9. d. Pages 31 thru 34 — The trips shown on Figures 19 thru 22 will need to be adjusted to reflect the changes to Figure 9 and any impact of the shift of the internal capture trips to the 32"d main access. 5. Key Intersection Operational Analysis a. Page 36 — Because the Youngfield traffic signals are part of a coordinated system, the actual signal timing for those signals should be used in the analysis, not an optimized timing. b. Page 36 - The HCM is stated as the method used to analyze the intersections. Using this method is not adequate, the proximity of the proposed intersections requires that a micro -simulation technique be used. The simulation needs to analyze the closely spaced intersection and access points for any queues, potential blockage and other traffic behaviors which may negatively affect the operation along 32nd particularly along the southern frontage of the development. c. Page 36 — The LOS for the individual movements for the 32"d & Youngfield intersection should also be included in Table 3. d. Page 37 — The 2nd paragraph discusses the need to continue to have the 32"d alley access be a full movement access to serve the Starbucks, which will not be allowed due to the significant safety issues created. Left turning movements will not be allowed because of the close proximity to the 32nd main access EB left turn lane and the 32nd & Youngfield WB left turn lanes. This traffic would be better served by an internal access to a new traffic signal at the 32"d main access. WB right -in movements will provide good access to the drive thru. Signage should be provided showing preference for this access for the drive thru. e. Page 37 — The 2nd paragraph also mentions having two outbound lanes for the alley access. As discussed above, the SB left -out movement will not be allowed. f. Page 39 — The 1" and 2nd paragraphs anticipate the diversion of traffic from the 32nd main access to the Youngfield signalized access because of the expected delays. This is not an acceptable solution to the expected delays at the unsignalized 32nd main access for the following reasons: i. Increases the traffic that is required to travel through the high pedestrian traffic areas in front of either the King Soopers or Applejacks entrances. Applewood Traffic Study May 14, 2015 Page 3 ii. Increases the left turn traffic at the existing signal at the Youngfield signalized access which already exceeds the allowable queue length during the 2016 pm peak. iii. Increases the left turn traffic at the existing signal at 32"d & Youngfield. iv. Increases the EB thru traffic on 32"d main access thereby causing additional delays at that access. g. Page 39 — A signal warrant analysis must be done for the 32"d main access because of the poor LOS and excessive queues. h. Page 43 — The LOS for the individual movements for the Youngfield signalized access should also be included in Table 8. 6. Intersection Queuing Analysis a. Page 45 — The following changes should be made to Table 10: i. The queues for all movements at all of the intersections should be included. ii. The existing lane length for the WB thru/right movement at the Youngfield signalized access should be included. iii. The WB left turn lane at the Youngfield signalized access does not extend into the drive aisle as noted in the footnote. b. Page 45 — The following issues are noted in Table 10: i. Since the queue length of the SB left at the 32"d main access exceeds the available turn lane length for both the left and right turn lanes for 2016 and 2035, the SB right turn movement will also experience similar excessive delays. ii. Since the queue length of the WB left at the Youngfield signalized access exceeds the available left turn lane length for 2016 and 2035, the WB thru/right will experience additional delays. This would be further exacerbated if trips divert from the 32"d main access as suggested in the study. c. Page 46 — The 2nd paragraph discusses the design for an EB left turn lane for the alley access. The WB left turn lanes cannot be shortened. The 32nd & Youngfield intersection has been designed to accommodate large amounts of additional traffic from the development site west of I-70 and the eventual relocation of the WB I-70 ramps to the south. 7. Conclusions and Recommendations a. Several of the conclusions and recommendations will need to be revised to reflect the comments made elsewhere in this memo. b. Given the complexities of the ongoing redevelopment for the Applewood Village Shopping Center, the traffic study and analysis, access design, and internal traffic patterns should be analyzed comprehensively for the long term layout and design for the entire south half of the center. Designing access and potential changes to the street network for just the beginning phases of a major redevelopment will likely result in safety and congestion issues as noted in these comments. Appendix D — Intersection Analysis Worksheets 8. As noted previously, the traffic signal at 32nd & Youngfield is part of a coordinated system. The actual timing for the signal should be obtained from the City and used for the modeling 9. As noted previously, the HCM is not adequate to analyze the intersections because of their close proximity and the long queue lengths. A micro -simulation analysis should be done. Applewood Traffic Study May 14, 2015 Page 4 Appendix E — Queuing Analysis Worksheets 10. The queues for several turning movements at the 32nd & Youngfield intersection show that they exceed the available capacity. This appears to be in error. 11. The WB right at the 32nd & Youngfield intersection appears to be the longest queue for the weekday pm. This needs to be shown on Table 10. M . � �.. �' �c Sterling Design Associates, Ilc CIVIL ENGINEERS - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS March 25, 2015 Mr. Dave Brossman Development Review Manager Wheat Ridge Public Works Department 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 RE: Drainage Letter — Starbucks at 3210 Youngfield Street Dear Mr. Brossman, Sterling Design Associates is providing this letter and plan as the drainage design for the above mentioned site. Existing Site Conditions The proposed site as it currently exist is vacant land; however, before demolition of the existing buildings, the site contained a gas station at the 3210 Youngfield Street address and commercial retail building at the 12755 W. 32nd Avenue address. The site is located on the northeast corner of Youngfield Street and W. 32nd Avenue. The site is bounded to the east by the service alley to Applejack Wine and Spirits and vacant building, to the south by W. 32"d Avenue, to the west by Youngfield Street, and to the North by Chili's Restaurant. The site as it existed historically appeared to have been primarily paved outside of the building footprint. The total area of both parcels of land that comprise the site is 0.80 acres. In its existing state, the site slopes gently to the east at approximately 2.0% on average. The site is located in Zone X (No Shading), which are areas determined to be outside of the 0.2% annual chance Floodplain. No know city or private storm sewer exist either along street frontages or adjacent properties. The Lee, Stewart and Eskins Ditch pipeline (30" dia. RCP) exists within the Right -of -Way along Youngfield Street on the west side of the site. Existing soils on-site are Denver -Urban Land Complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes which are classified as Hydrologic Soil Group C. Proposed Conditions The vacant site is proposed to be re -developed into a 2,500 square foot Starbucks Cafe with a Drive-Thru, covered patio area, and associated store parking. In post development conditions, the site is comprised of four sub -basins. Each sub -basin is described in detail below. Sub -Basin A 1(0.29 acre) is composed of asphalt parking, concrete drives and walks, roof drainage, and landscaped area. The Sub -Basin is located on the western portion of the site and runoff is conveyed via the integral curb section and 4 -foot wide pan to a Single Wheat Ridge Valley Inlet in a sump condition. C values for this basin are 0.62 and 0.73 for the 5 and 100 -year storm events, respectively. Direct runoff rates are 0.89 and 2.00 cfs for the 5 and 100 -year storm events, respectively. In the event of an inlet failure, runoff would pool to a peak depth of 6.2 - inches and discharge to the east. The inlet is sized to capture the 100 -year storm and runoff is conveyed via a 15 -inch diameter RCP to the sump inlet located in Sub -Basin A2. Sub -Basin A2 (0.42 acre) is composed of asphalt parking, concrete drives and walks (including the drive-thru lane, roof drainage, and landscaped area. The Sub -Basin is located on the eastern portion of the site and runoff is conveyed via integral curb section and 4 -foot wide pan to a Single Wheat Ridge Combination Inlet in a sump condition. C values for this basin are 0.51 and 0.66 for the 5 year and 100 -year storm events, respectively. Direct runoff rates are 1.06 and 2.64 cfs for the 5 and 100 -year storm events, respectively. In the event of an inlet failure, runoff would pool to a peak depth of 6 inches and would overflow into a drainage pan and would be conveyed to the north along the Applejack Wine and Spirits Service Alley. The inlet is sized to capture the 100 -year storm event and is conveyed via an 18 -inch diameter RCP to a manhole (STORM MH #6) located in the Applejack Wine and Spirits service alley. Combined storm sewer flow from the storm sewer system (Sub -Basins Al and A2) will be 1.92 and 4.58 cfs for the 5 and 100 -year storm events, respectively. This storm sewer continuation is part of the Master Drainage Report for the Applewood Village Shopping Center, prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates revised March 17, 2015 (Master Drainage Report). Offsite storm sewer will convey on-site runoff to a detention basin outlined in this report. Sub -Basin OS -1 (0.05 acre) is composed of landscaped area that will discharge via sheet flow off-site to the property to the north (Chili's Restaurant). Runoff is discharged to an existing drainage swale located on the south side of the Chili's building and to an existing drainage pan located in the Chili's parking lot. C values for this basin are 0.15 and 0.50 for the 5 and 100 -year storm events, respectively. Direct runoff rates are 0.04 and 0.23 cfs for the 5 and 100 -year storm events, respectively. Sub -Basin OS -2 (0.03 acre) is composed of landscaped, concrete pad for the trash enclosure as well as the concrete drainage pan. Runoff is discharged north into the existing Applejack Wine and Spirits service alley. C values for this basin are 0.36 and 0.59 for the 5 and 100 -year storm events, respectively. Direct runoff rates are 0.05 and 0.16 cfs for the 5 and 100 -year storm events, respectively. Detention The Master Drainage Report was prepared in order to redevelop portions of the shopping center outside the limits of this project and provide detention requirements for all areas of redevelopment, including the Starbucks site. The detention basin proposed as part of this project will detain the Water Quality Capture Volume (WQCV), 5 -year plus 100% of the WQCV and 100 -year plus 50% of the WQCV. The Starbucks site lies in Basin F of this report and was assumed to be 95% impervious which is significantly more than the 66.9% imperviousness that will exist once the site is developed based on the enclosed calculations. As part of the Master Drainage Report, storm sewer is proposed to be installed to Storm MH #6 as identified on the Master Drainage Plan, Sheet 1 of 2. Storm sewer from the Starbucks site will tie into this manhole and will be conveyed to the proposed detention pond. Calculated design flowrates in this report for Basin F are 3.1 and 5.9 cfs for the 5 and 100 -year storm events, respectively. Included with this letter are detailed calculations which yield peak flowrates in the connecting storm sewer of 1.92 cfs and 4.58 cfs for the 5 and 100 -year storm events, respectively. Due to the lower actual imperviousness of the site as detailed in this letter when compared to the Master Drainage Report, the detention basin as designed would be providing additional WQCV and detention volume for Basin F than what is required. Storm sewers designed in the Master Drainage Report would be adequate to handle on-site storm flows. It is anticipated that construction of the King Soopers fuel center and detention pond will be in the Spring of 2015. This timing would coincide and with the construction of the proposed storm sewer improvements on-site. At this time, an interim condition WQCV pond for this site has not been designed. Conclusions In general, the proposed project minimizes the amount runoff entering and exiting the Site with the exception of what is conveyed to the storm sewer system. Areas in which runoff comes in contact with proposed impervious surfaces are conveyed to two storm inlets located on site. The storm sewer is designed to capture the 5 and 100 -year storm events and convey runoff via storm sewer to the proposed offsite storm sewer system and detention pond designed in the Master Drainage Report. Portions of the site that are conveyed to the northern property line are all landscaped, therefore minimizing the effect of additional runoff entering the adjoining property. A drainage pan located in the Applejack Wine and Spirits service alley which conveys runoff to the inlet located in Sub -Basin A2, is designed in order to minimize the amount of additional runoff conveyed north along the existing Alley due to the overall flatness of the alley in the area adjacent to the eastern property line of the site. Drainage Calculations have been provided as attachments in this letter. Calculations were performed using the latest version of the City of Wheat Ridge Site Drainage Requirements. Appropriate tables and charts used have been attached to this letter. If additional information is required please don't hesitate to contact me at 303-7944727 ext. 206. Regards, Owen Keenan, PE Civil Engineer Sterling Design Associates, LLC Attachments: Tables/Charts Runoff Calculations Inlet Calculations 5 and 100 -yr Storm Sewer Routing Drainage Plan 7 X O 6 2 W a � 5 U1 U Z 4 F- U) Z LU f - z 3 2 O 0 I I 4 y� Y S y�- 2 YEAR 10 20 30 40 50 60 TIME IN MINUTES FIGURE 5-1 EXAMPLE 5.2 TIME - INTENSITY - FREQUENCY CURVES T. 3 S. , R.66 W. 5-1-84 URBAN DRAINACC 6 FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 1 A recent subdivision has an approved Drainage Report/Plan on file. 32 Rev_ 10/14 Reference the UDFCD Criteria " Not required for a Preliminary Report TABLE RO-3 Recommended Percentage Imperviousness Values Land Use or Surface Characteristics Percentage Imperviousness Business: Commercial areas 95 Neighborhood areas 85 Residential.- esidential:Sin Single-family le-famil Multi -unit detached 60 Multi -unit attached 75 Half -acre lot or larger Apartments 80 Industdal: Light areas 80 Heavy areas 90 Parks, cemeteries 5 Playgrounds 10 Schools 50 Railroad yard areas 15 Undeveloped Areas: Histodc flow analysis 2 Greenbelts, a dcultural 2 Off-site flow analysis when land use not defined 45 Streets: Paved 100 Gravel(packed) 40 Drive and walks 90 Roofs 90 Lawns, sandy soil 0 Lawns, clayey soil 0 'See Figures RO-3 through RO-5, Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual, Volume 1, June 2001, for percentage imperviousness. 1 A recent subdivision has an approved Drainage Report/Plan on file 33 Rev. 10/14 Reference the UDFCD Criteria Not required for a Preliminary Report TABLE RO-5 Runoff Coefficients, C Percentage Imperviousness Type C and D NRCS Hydrologic Soil Grou s 0% 5% 2 -yr 0.04 0.08 5 -yr 0.15 0.18 10 r 0.25 0.28 25 -yr 0.37 0.39 50- r 0.44 0.46 100- r 0.50 0.52 10% 15% 0.11 0.14 0.21 0.24 0.30 0.32 0.41 0.43 0.47 0.49 0.53 0.54 20% 25% 0.17 0.20 0.26 0.28 0.34 0.36 0.44 0.46 0.50 0.51 0.55 0.56 30% 0.22 0.30 0.38 0.47 0.52 0.57 35% 40% 0.25 0.28 0.33 0.35 0.40 0.42 0.48 0.50 0.53 0.54 0.57 0.58 45% 0.31 0.37 0.44 0.51 0.55 0.59 50% 55% 60% 0.34 0.37 0.41 0.40 0.43 0.46 0.46 0.48 0.51 0.53 0.55 0.57 0.57 0.58 0.60 0.60 0.62 0.63 65% 70% 0.45 0.49 0.49 0.53 0.54 0.57 0.59 0.62 0.62 0.65 0.65 0.68 75% 0.54 0.58 0.62 0.66 0.68 0.71 80% 0.60 0.63 0.66 0.70 0.72 0.74 85% 0.66 0.68 0.71 0.75 0.77 0.79 90% 0.73 0.75 0.77 0.80 0.82 0.83 95% 0.80 0.82 0.84 0.$7 0.88 0.89 100% 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.95 0.96 T e B NRC S H drolo is Soils Grou 0% 0.02 0.08 0.15 0.25 0.30 0.35 5% 0.04 0.10 0.19 0.28 0.33 0.38 10% 0.06 0.14 0.22 0.31 0.36 0.40 15% 0.08 0.17 0.25 0.33 0.38 0.42 20% 0.12 0.20 0.27 0.35 0.40 0.44 25% 0.15 0.22 0.30 0.37 0.41 0.46 30% 0.18 0.25 0.32 0.39 0.43 0.47 35% 0.20 0.27 0.34 0.41 0.44 0.48 40% 0.23 0.30 0.36 0.42 0.46 0.50 45% 0.26 0.32 0.38 0.44 0.48 0.51 50% 0.29 0.35 0.40 0.46 0.49 0.52 55% 0.33 0.38 0.43 0.48 0.51 0.54 60% 0.37 0.41 0.46 0.51 0.54 0.56 65% 0.41 0.45 0.49 0.54 0.57 0.59 70% 0.45 0.49 0.53 0.58 0.60 0.62 75% 0.51 0.54 0.58 0.62 0.64 0.66 80% 0.57 0.59 0.63 0.66 0.68 0.70 85% 0.63 0.66 0.69 0.72 0.73 0.75 90% 0.71 0.73 0.75 0.78 0.80 0.81 % 0.79 0.81 0.83 0.85 0.87 0.88 100 0% 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.95 0.96 1 A recent subdivision has an approved Drainage Report/Plan on rile. 35 Rev. 10114 Reference the UDFCD Criteria " Not required for a Preliminary Report TABLE RO-5 (CONTINUED) Runoff Coefficients. C Percentage Imperviousness T e A NRCS H drolo is Soil Groups 2 -yr 5- r 10- r 25 -yr 50 -yr 100- r 0% 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.12 0.16 0.20 5°/0 0.00 0.02 0.10 0.16 0.20 0.24 10% 0.00 0.06 0.14 0.20 0.24 0.28 15% 0.02 0.10 0.17 0.23 0.27 0.30 20% 0.06 0.13 0.20 0.26 0.30 0.33 25% 0.09 0.16 0.23 0.29 0.32 0.35 30% 0.13 0.19 0.25 0.31 0.34 0.37 35% 0.16 0.22 0.28 0.33 0.36 0.39 40% 0.19 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.38 0.41 45% 0.22 0.27 0.33 0.37 0.40 0.43 50% 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.42 0.45 55% 0.29 0.33 0.38 0.42 0.45 0.47 60% 0.33 0.37 0.41 0.45 0.47 0.50 65% 0.37 0.41 0.45 0.49 0.51 0.53 70% 0.42 0.45 0.49 0.53 0.54 0.56 75% 0.47 0.50 0.54 0.57 0.59 0.61 80% 0.54 0.56 0.60 0.63 0.64 0.66 85% 0.61 0.63 0.66 0.69 0.70 0.72 90% 0.69 0.71 0.73 0.76 0.77 0.79 95%0.78 0.80 0.82 0.84 0.85 0.86 100% 0.89 1 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.95 0.96 1 A recent subdivision has an approved Drainage Report/Plan on file. 36 Rev. 10114 Reference the UDFCD Criteria " Not required for a Preliminary Report Weighted Imperviousness Date: 3/11/15 Job Name: Starbucks - 32nd Avenue & Youngfield - Wheat Ridge By: OKK .1 Roof 90 Lawns 0 Paved Streets 100 Conc. Drives & Walks 90 '% Impervious from Wheat Ridge Site Drainage Requirements - Table RO-3 Hydrologic Soil Group = C (NRCS Web Soil Survey) PROPOSED SITE Total A Basins 3026 7412 12494 7851 30783 0.71 72.4 0.55 0.69 Total 3026 10164 12494 8465 34149 0.78 66.9 0.50 0.66 Asphalt Conc. Drives Total Total Basin Roof Lawn Drives & Walks SF Acres 1 M C5 C100 Al 1867 2088 5379 3146 12480 0.29 79.3 0.62 0.73 A2 1159 5324 7115 4705 18303 0.42 67.7 0.51 0.66 OS 1 0 2108 0 0 2108 0.05 0.0 0.15 0.50 OS2 0 644 0 614 1258 0.03 43.9 0.36 0.59 Total A Basins 3026 7412 12494 7851 30783 0.71 72.4 0.55 0.69 Total 3026 10164 12494 8465 34149 0.78 66.9 0.50 0.66 o`Ncn Q O-4 3 3 v d n cn �Av ado y O i W N n o g o � O 4Z 1Z 3 3 * O `D a) D co D ro c c ro P. 0 0 c ro a C ro m x CL Co ro n o 0 z < o � m s. m N N + O DESIGN PEAK FLOW FOR ONE-HALF OF STREET OR GRASS -LINED CHANNEL BY THE RATIONAL METHOD Prolan:__ Starbucks - 32nd Ave 6 Youngfield St Inlet ID: Basin Al - DP 1 OVERLAND I SSIU I OVERLAND JL�l FLOW _Ory GUTTER FLOW GUTTER PLUS CARRYOVER FLOW Show Detail. ROADWAY CENTERLINE -Peak 1b br 12 of sesel OR grassined cnaaroly •pK„o�„ r s n Row 14. skin the reel of thk h..r n.,.r ....,,-�.w •.. -�• n .._--. __ ._ cfsFILL IN THIS SECTION Design Sbrm RMrn Period, T, Return Penod Onei Precipitation, P, s he C,= Ci= Cr= User -Defined Storm Runoff Coeffioenl (leave this blank to accept a wk:ulaled vaksi), C = User -Defined Syr Runoff Coefficient (leave this blanc to accept a calculated vakre), Cs = Bypass (Carry -Over) Flow from upstream Subcatchments, t, . 0.0 0.0 ds Total Design Peak Flow, p - p,pg p -pp cls ILL IN THE ECTIONS BELOW, Basin Al - INLET.xlsm, C -Peak 311112015, 2:37 PM SubcalcMrentArea =� Ste Type: O Ste is O Site s Ran -Urban FNo- On'igfed For _ sl cat m ca Q Aro. Inks n a Medan Pa"" eIpervious% mness = q, rcent NRCS Soil T Ype < A. B. C, or D Slope (IV(t) Length (it) Overland Flow = Chamal Flow =F - Design Sbrm RMrn Period, T, Return Penod Onei Precipitation, P, s he C,= Ci= Cr= User -Defined Storm Runoff Coeffioenl (leave this blank to accept a wk:ulaled vaksi), C = User -Defined Syr Runoff Coefficient (leave this blanc to accept a calculated vakre), Cs = Bypass (Carry -Over) Flow from upstream Subcatchments, t, . 0.0 0.0 ds Total Design Peak Flow, p - p,pg p -pp cls ILL IN THE ECTIONS BELOW, Basin Al - INLET.xlsm, C -Peak 311112015, 2:37 PM INLET IN A SUMP OR SAG LOCATION Project = Starbucks - 32nd Ave 6 Youngfleld St Inlet ID Basin Al - DP 7 .r --Lo H -Curb H -W rt Wo W Lo (G) 3 of Inlet N Depression (additional to coriinuous gutter depress—'a' from'O-AloW) fiber of Unit Idets (Grate or Cub Operirg) ar Depth at FbvAine (outside of tical depression) if information It of a Unit Grate h of a Unit Grate Opering Ratio for a Grate (typical values 0.15.0.60) ging Factor for a Si gie Grate (typical value 0.50 - 0.70) a Weir Coeffiaert (typical value 2.15 - 3.60) 3 Orifice Coeffiaery (typical va►ue 0.60 - 0.60) i Opening Information th of a Unit Curb Opening I of Vertical Curb Opening in Inches it of Cub Orifice Throat in Inches r of Throat (see USDCM Figure ST -5) Width for Depression Pan (typically the gutter w M of 2 feet) prig Factor for a Single Cub Opening (typical value 0.10) Opening Weir Coefficient (typical value 2.3-3.7) Opening Onfioe Coefficient (typical value 0.60 - 0.70) Inlet Interception Capacity (assumes clogged condition) Pacify IS GOOD for Minor and Major Storms f>Q PEAI 0— L, (C) = H_ = H— = Theta We' G (C) = C. (C) = C. (C) = Qs MINOR MAJOR Idet Type = Derner No. 16 Valley Gmte WA �r = 2.00 inches No = 1 2.6 2.6 Ponding Dept= 6.0 6.0 irr:h- MINOR MAJOR U O. a Depths 4 (G) = 3.00 feet W. = 1.73 feet A., = 0.31 Cn (G) = 0.50 0.50 C. (G)= 3.60 C. (G) 0.60 MINOR MAJOR 0— L, (C) = H_ = H— = Theta We' G (C) = C. (C) = C. (C) = Qs WA WA WA WA WA WA WA WA WA MINOR MAJC 2.6 2.6 Basin At - INLET.Asm, Inlet In Sump 3/11/2015, 2'.38 PM DESIGN PEAK FLOW FOR ONE-HALF OF STREET OR GRASS -LINED CHANNEL BY THE RATIONAL METHOD Project: _Starbucks • 32nd Ave 6 YoungBeld St Inlet ID: Basin A2 - DP 2 SIDE LI =Li STREET I FLOW OVERLAND r4 UI L. - GUTTER FLOW GUTTER PLUS CARRYOVER FLOW Show Details ROADWAY CENTERLINE (local paak flow for 12 or 5"ot OR grins*wd rnervnp. In Row 14. ski. tl .t of t k •1—. r.nA — Ste Type: Rows D1sldoped For. O Site isaeon Q sInlets ets O site a NmUrban Q Arm was in a Me01en� Slbcatc rvfo Area =�Aaes n PerceIrnpervrousness = �, NRCS Soil Type = A, B, C, or D Slope (full) LergM Ill) Overland Flow- Channel Flow = Design Storm Return Period. T, Rehm Period Ons -How Precipitation P, C, User -Defined Storm Runoff Coefficient (leave this biar* to accept a Cala fitted finvalue). C = User -Deed 5 -yr. R"ff CoefFlcient (leave this blarsl to accept a ..value), Cs = Bypass (Cany-Ovx) Flow from upstream Subcatchments, 4 = 0.0 0.0 cts Total Design Peak Flow, 0 1.16 264 ds IN THIS SECTION IN THE TIONS BELOW. Basin A2 - INLET.xlsm, O -Peak 3/11/2015. 2:36 PM INLET IN A SUMP OR SAG LOCATION Project = Starbucks - 32nd Ave a Voungfleld St Inlet ID = Bash A2 - DP 2 41 LO (C) --,r H -Curb H -Vert Wo W WP L,—Lo �— o (G) e of Inlet al Depression (additional to corenuous goner depression -a' from'O-Abut) lber of Unt Inlets (Grate or Cub Opening) or Depth at FloWme (outside of local depression) a Information )th of a Unit Grate '.h of a Unit Grate i Opening Ratio for a Grate (typical values 0.15-0.90) ging Factor for a Single Grate (typical value 0.50 - 0.70) e Weir Coefficient (typical value 2.15 - 3.60) a Orifice Coefficient (typical value 0.60 - 0.80) r Openkrg information th of a Unit Cub Opening ht of vertical Cub Opening in Inches M of Curb mice Throat in Inches n of Throat (see USOCM Figure ST -5) Width for Depression Pan (typically the guter wdth of 2 feet) prig Factor for a Single Cub Opening (typical value 0.10) Opening Weir Coefficient (Weal value 2.3-3.7) Opening Orifice Coefficient (typical value 0.60 - 0.70) Inlet Interception Capacity (assumes clogged condition) paclty IS GOOD for Minor and Maior Storms, 1,,0 PFeX1 L. (C) = H..r = H. = Theta - MINOR MAJOR Inlet Type • Wheat Ridge Combination 5.25 = 2.00 inches No = 1 0.10 0.10 Ponding Depth = 6.0 .0 inriws MINOR MAJOR I] O+e^ide Depths LP (G) = 2.75 feet W. = 1.37 feet Aero = 0.65 G (G) = 0.50 0.50 C. (G)= 3.60 CP (G) = 0.67 MINOR MAJOR L. (C) = H..r = H. = Theta - 2.88 feel Inct inch deg 6.00 5.25 0.00 WP= 2.00 feet Cr(C)= 0.10 0.10 C. (C) = 3.80 CP (C) 4e 7 MINOR MAJOR Cis 3.7 3.7 eou¢n = 1 t 2.6 1cfS Basin A2 - INLET.Asm, Inlet In Sump 311112015, 2:36 PM Node ID: Rim (ft): Invert (fl): Min Pipe Cover (ft): Max HGL (it): Link ID: Length (ft): Dia (in): Slope (ft/f t): Up Invert (ft): Dn Invert (ft): Max Q (cfs): Max Vel (ft/s]: Max Depth (ft): 0+95 1+00 1+05 1+10 1+15 1+20 1+25 1+30 1+35 1+40 1+45 1+50 1+55 1+60 1+65 1+70 1+75 1+80 1+85 1+90 r1+95 2+00 2+05 2+10 2+15 2+20 2+25 2+30 2+35 2+40 2+45 2+50 2+55 2+60 2+65 2+70 2+75 2+80 ?+RS 9+cn )+as ., 5 -YEAR 03/24/2015 00-05:00 N + w m STORM 1 5,526 o ao 5,525.5 M N ___ _____ _____ ___________ 5,525 +� _____ - - - - _____ ______ 5,524.5 c G - ---- --- ---- — ---- ------------ --- --- ---- ---- ---- ---- -- 2 ai H ---- ----- 5,524 -- ------------------ —------- ------ ----- --- — -- --- ---- --- 5,523.5 `-� — — ----- �+ ---- 5,523 --^ �.� — uH -- - ----- ---- --- ---- ---- 5,522.5 f ' ' Link ID {STORM).STM15 — — — - - - - - w r n - — w -- -- ----- - — 5,522 - - - - - - - - - - - La ' - --- -------- --- -Length 132.60 tt -- ----- --------- n ti --- a 5,521.5 Diafi3OBttr ~ N ---- ----- - " --, ----� ----------- --- ----- 5,521 Slope0.0268ft/ft -- --- --------- - --------- Up Invert 5519.15 ft — ---- ---- ---- xi raN� i. 5,520.5Dnlnvert5515.60tt --'-----i-----i------;---- --------------- - -----, ---- --- ---- ------------ ------ -- -------------- -4 ; -----------5,520 --------- ------------ ------------- = = = 5,519.5 : y Lu --- ---- --- - --- --- -- --- 5,518.5 Link ID(STORM)STM18 ----- -- 5,518 ---- --- ---- --- ---- -------- -------;----- Length --- F1=1tUr ST1N24 Dia 18 00 in Length 74 tt w w 5,517.5 ; ; ; ; ; Slope 0.0100 f fft Dia 24. 5,517 Invert 5515-35 ft lope 0.0145 "M -- - ---- --- ---- -- Dn Invert 5515 02 tt Up Invert 5514.52 It u �� 5,516.5 --- ---- ----- -- --------------------DnInvert5514.15ft ----.----- ti 5,516 ----- ----',----- -----',-----',----------',------ ---------------�----- ---- ,`-----�----- H u 5,515 ,_ , ,_ ' ', ` 5,514.5 � � �-----" ` ', 5,514 .- �_ , - _ ----- -�- ---- ----- ---- --------------------------------------- - -- --- ----� 5,513.5 --� -- _ --- --- ---- ----- ---- ---- -, ---- - --------- -,---- -.------�----- -�- ---- ----- --- - ----- - -- Node ID: Rim (ft): Invert (fl): Min Pipe Cover (ft): Max HGL (it): Link ID: Length (ft): Dia (in): Slope (ft/f t): Up Invert (ft): Dn Invert (ft): Max Q (cfs): Max Vel (ft/s]: Max Depth (ft): 0+95 1+00 1+05 1+10 1+15 1+20 1+25 1+30 1+35 1+40 1+45 1+50 1+55 1+60 1+65 1+70 1+75 1+80 1+85 1+90 r1+95 2+00 2+05 2+10 2+15 2+20 2+25 2+30 2+35 2+40 2+45 2+50 2+55 2+60 2+65 2+70 2+75 2+80 ?+RS 9+cn )+as Node ID: Rim [ft): Invert (ft): Min Pipe Cover (ft): Max HGL [ft): Link ID: Length (ft): Dia (in)' Slope (ft/ft): Up Invert (ft): Dn Invert [ft): Max Q (cfs): Max Vel (ft/s): Max Depth (ft): w 1 00•YEAR 03/24/2015 00:05:00 a STORM 1 5,526 5,525.5 y'ai-uvri ____ ____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ ____ ____ _____ _____ _____ _____ a_____ 5,525 ~ u1 M _____ ____ ____------------ - _________._ 5,524.5a G --- --- ----- ----- ---- ---- -------------- ---- ----- 5,524 5,523.5 --- ----- 5,523 - — w -- -- __ ________________ w ,y b -N + _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _____ 5,522 _-___ ____________ --------- --------- ---- link ID {STORM}.STM15 .•y �] ,a ____ _____________ .- + ^+ ----- ---- nyth132.60tt ti a aeo 5,521.5 — — Die�00 - � o b cj 5521 Slope 0.026aftlft - -- ---- --------------- ---- ----- ----- ------------ Up Invert 5519.15 tt ~ w u, — N 5,520.5 DnInvert5515.60tt j u ---- ---- --- ---- t ---- P 5,520 F i •f i i i--- i ----- --------- ---- --- ----- 5,519.5 W 5,519 - ___ ___ __________________ _____ ____ _____ _________f__-__T___-.T-.__-T_____1-1_--__1_____l_____ -- ------------ --- --- ____-_____f'-- , -__.. _ ________ 5,518.5 �___-_-_____i__________________ _ --- ----- ----- --- ID {STORM}.STM1B --- ----- 5,518 T : ; ; ; - • - - - - - - Length 33.17 tt- Link ID {S7QRM }.STM24 - - 4 ------- 5,517.5 ------ -- -;-----;-----;-----;------'------'-----'---- Die 16.00 in Length 74 tt 5,517 ---•-----------------'-----------------'--- p nv ert 55105 35 ft Slope 0 0145 DnlInvert 5515.02 tt Invert Up 5514.57tt u + 5,516.5 - , r .---- --- ----- --- - -- Dn Invert 5514.15 tt �' u✓ 5,516------------ . _____ ____ _____J___ --_---1-----L---__ ----- ------ ----- 5,515.5 ____ ___ ____ ___ - ---- ----- ---- ---- 5,515 --- — --- --- ----- ------------------------4----- ---- �---- -- ---- ----- - `J 5,514.5----------------- — ------ 5,514 - --� -- ------------------ ----- ' - ---- - --------- 5,513.5 -- _ f ------ --- 0+9$ -- -4 ---r- , 1+00 1+0$ 1+10 1+15 1+20 1+2$ 1+30 1+35 1+40 1+4$ 1+50 1+5$ 1+60 1+65 1+70 1+7$ 1+80 1+8$ 1+90 2+00 2+0$ 2+10 2+15 2+20 ^1+g5 2+2$ 2+30 ... 2+35 2+40 2+45 2+50 2+55 2+60 2+ 65 ?+7n 9+75 '�.an ��Qc Node ID: Rim [ft): Invert (ft): Min Pipe Cover (ft): Max HGL [ft): Link ID: Length (ft): Dia (in)' Slope (ft/ft): Up Invert (ft): Dn Invert [ft): Max Q (cfs): Max Vel (ft/s): Max Depth (ft): City of Wheat jdge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Date: March 30, 2015 Community Development 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 303.235.2846 Fax: 303.235.2857 Community Development Referral Form Response Due: April 14, 2015 The Wheat Ridge Community Development Department has received a request for approval of a Specific Development Plan to allow a drive —through restaurant in a Planned Commercial Development (PCD) zone district at 3210 Youngfield and 12755 W. 32nd Avenue. The intent is to redevelop the site for a Starbucks restaurant in Applewood Village Shopping Center. The application also includes a variance to the 20' build -to requirement in the Contemporary Overlay area identified in the Architectural and Design Manual. Case No.: WZ-15-02/ Starbucks SDP Request: The applicant proposes redevelopment of two parcels located in the Applewood Village Shopping Center located at 3210 Youngfield and 12755 W. 32nd Avenue. The site is vacant and .8 acres in size. New construction will include a drive-through restaurant with 3000 square feet of floor area. A consolidation plat has been submitted for the property to combine the two lots into one. It is being referred out under separate cover pursuant to Case No. MS -15-01. Please respond to this request in writing regarding your ability to serve the property. Please specify any new infrastructure needed or improvements to existing infrastructure that will be required. Include any easements that will be essential to serve the property as a result of this development. Please detail the requirements for development in respect to your rules and regulations. No response from you will constitute having no objections or concerns regarding this proposal. If you need further clarification, contact the case manager. Case Manager: Meredith Reckert Voice: 303.235.2848 Fax: 303.235.2857 Email: mreckert@ci.wheatridge.co.us DISTRIBUTION: Consolidated Mutual Water Northwest Lakewood Sanitation Wheat Ridge Fire District CenturyLink Xcel Energy CDOT Wheat Ridge Public Works Wheat Ridge Police Wheat Ridge Building Division Wheat Ridge Economic Development 'The Carnation Citr i,i -Z5-1 Sterling Design Associates, Ilc CIVIL ENGINEERS - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Written Request and Description Date: 03.23.15 To: Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Department 7500 W. 29th Ave. 2nd Floor Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 From: Owen Keenan, PE RE: SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN Starbucks at W 32nd Avenue & Youngfield Street 3210 Youngfield Street, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Sterling Design Associates has prepared a Specific Development Plan (SDP) submittal on behalf of Regency Centers, L.P. for the development of a Starbucks cafe with drive-thru. It is the intent of Regency Centers, L.P. to redevelop a portion of the southwest corner of the Applewood Village Shopping Center into a 2,500 square foot Starbucks cafe with a drive-thru and associated parking. The Starbucks site area is comprised of two existing parcels containing approximately 0.80 acre. The proposed Starbucks site lies within a Planned Commercial Development (PCD) zoning as defined in the Applewood Village Shopping Center Amendment #9 Outline Development Plan (ODP). The Applewood Village Shopping Center is also located in the Contemporary Overlay Area as defined in the Wheat Ridge Architectural and Site Design Manual. The proposed Starbucks cafe has adequate accessibility and utility services to the site. Access to the site will be from an improved entrance to the Applejack Wine & Spirits service/delivery alley as well as a right -in only access off of W. 32nd Avenue approved by a Special Use Permit, which includes approval of a right -out only egress onto Youngfield Street. The proposed Starbucks cafe will provide indoor and outdoor patio seating as well as a drive-thru. The building has been positioned in order to balance vehicular circulation while maintaining the required "build to" distance off of Youngfield Street. The site will provide ample off-street parking and drive-thru stacking of up to eleven cars before on-site circulation is affected. Proposed sidewalk on-site as well as a connection to the W. 32nd Avenue sidewalk, near the existing RTD bus stop, will promote a pedestrian friendly entrance to the Starbucks cafe. A consolidation re -plat of the two existing parcels will be prepared and recorded prior to the issuance of a building permit. The re -plat will be submitted as a separate document not included with this SDP submittal. Jay M. Newell, PE Wayne T. Sterling, RLA, LEED AP 2009 W. Littleton Blvd. #300 Littleton, CO 80120 303.794.4727 ph -.Sterling DesignAssociates.com V Sterling Design Associates, Ilc CIVIL ENGINEERS - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS The proposed Starbucks SDP is consistent with the overall purpose of the Applewood Village Shopping Center ODP. Below are responses to the SDP review criteria as stated in Section 26- 305.D of the Municipal Code. The proposed specific development plan is consistent with the purpose of a planned development as stated in section 26-301 of this article. Response: The proposed Starbucks site is located within a PCD in the Applewood Village Shopping Center. The existing shopping center contains a diverse group of mixed retail uses and the Starbucks cafe is consistent with other businesses within the development. The proposed specific development plan is consistent with the design intent or purpose of the approved outline development plan. Response: The Applewood Village Shopping Center ODP states ongoing and future development of the shopping center will be consistent with the land uses established in the PCD. The proposed Starbucks cafe is consistent with other land uses within the development. The proposed uses indicated in the specific development plan are consistent with uses approved by the outline development plan. Response: The Applewood Village Shopping Center as characterized in the ODP by all formats of retail use. The proposed Starbucks cafe is consistent with other retail facilities within the development. 4. The site is appropriately designed and is consistent with the development guidelines established in the outline development plan. Response: The new development guidelines as outlined in the Applewood Village Shopping Center Amendment #9 ODP is consistent with the proposed Starbucks cafe as designed. The building design utilizes a variety of materials including stone, brick, glass, stucco and structural steel canopies. The inclusion of low screen walls and refuse enclosure screen which match primary building materials are consistent with the Applewood Shopping Center Development Guidelines. 5. Adequate infrastructure/facilities are available to serve the subject property, or the applicant will upgrade and provide such where they do not exist or are under capacity. Response: Adequate water and sewer service is available for the proposed Starbucks cafe. Water and sewer mains will be connected within the Right -of -Way in W. 32nd Avenue. Storm drainage improvements, including a detention pond and storm sewer are proposed as part of the King Soopers Fueling center located near the southeast corner of the site. This detention pond was designed to provide detention requirements for the proposed Starbucks cafe. In addition to the detention pond, storm sewer will be constructed up to the proposed Starbucks cafe Site which will convey on-site storm sewer flows to the proposed pond. Jay M. Newell, PE Wayne T. Sterling, RLA, LEED AP 2009 W. Littleton Blvd. #300 Littleton, CO 80120 303.794.4727 ph -.SterlingDes ignAssociates.com Sterling Design Associates, Ilc CIVIL ENGINEERS - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS The proposed specific development plan is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual, Streetscape Design Manual and other applicable design standards. Response: The site design of the proposed Starbucks cafe provides an efficient, low - impact development that integrates with surrounding businesses. The proposed sidewalk configuration promotes a walkable environment with connection points to W. 32nd Avenue and the service alley to the east of the Site. Building placement promotes visibility from the intersection at Youngfield Street and W. 32nd Avenue. The building also provides screening the drive-thru lane from off-site traffic. Landscaped areas will utilize colorful and textural low water demand plantings, seeded grass, and a blend of deciduous and evergreen trees. We look forward to your feedback and working with you in an attempt to develop an exceptional project for Starbucks and the City of Wheat Ridge. Please feel free to contact myself should there be any questions of if additional information is needed. Owen Keenan, PE Civil Engineer Sterling Design Associates Jay M. Newell, PE Wayne T. Sterling, RLA, LEED AP 2009 W. Littleton Blvd. #300 Littleton, CO 80120 303.794.4727 ph www. Sterl i n K Des ignA ssocia to s. com Alternative Development Plan Narrative & Justification Date: 03.19.15 To: Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Department 7500 W. 29th Ave. 2nd Floor Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 From: Eric Chekal, Regency Centers, L.P. RE: Alternative Development Plan Narrative & Justification as Provided by Regency Centers, L.P. Enclosed is a proposed Alternative Development Plan submitted for consideration by Wheat Ridge Staff. This alternative proposes a northbound lane along the west property line, in addition to the south bound lane already shown on the Development Plan. Allowing two-way traffic west of the proposed Starbucks building provides for much better traffic flow for this small site. The property has already been significantly hampered by only allowing individual right -in and right -out curb cuts. Since the west drive is only one-way south there is only one way for customers wishing to gather and enjoy the facility, those that don't want to use the drive through, to leave the property. Also by restricting this drive we are creating a dead end parking field with no way to turn around if the stalls west of the 32nd Avenue right -in are full. Should this alternative be allowed, appropriate stop signage will be added at the northwest corner of Starbucks to control the traffic at the 'T' intersection. We understand an administrative variance would also be required for the build -to requirements which we are willing to pursue as we did when the Special Use Permit was processed and approved in 2013. Thank you for your consideration, we look forward to discussing this important part of this development. 4 a4 ,y p WW I O NI w z I E O t fill CL t q R wQt - -= - --— — — --7-- wLU r------------- ---- w � � U F� 0 Q w ZO U — s.a •.a. 9 - ` zzN�'' Z U • � n ° az ;=oV d Z g � w te(L;$>_e F—zwaQ w =w � 1,�1111 z-- xz aaz3w QO°oma o 13i V)a� J iz w —Q e U LL, w � I Q�— i g I— ¢ y�aiiBPy� Zti s ------------------ ------ --r-lit ----------------------- HIM ------------------------------------------------- - ---- i W LL Q' a g 4 a4 ,y p WW I O NI w z I E O t fill CL t q R wQt - -= - --— — — --7-- wLU r------------- ---- w � � U F� 0 Q w ZO U — s.a •.a. 9 - ` zzN�'' Z U • � n ° az ;=oV d Z g � w te(L;$>_e F—zwaQ w =w � 1,�1111 z-- xz aaz3w QO°oma o 13i V)a� J iz w —Q e U LL, w � I Q�— i g I— ¢ y�aiiBPy� Zti s ------------------ ------ --r-lit ----------------------- HIM ------------------------------------------------- - ---- i ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVE)l B2 EXCEPTIONS: 9. RESERVATION OF OIL, GAS, AND OTHER MINERALS CONTAINED IN WARRANTY DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 24, 1962 IN BOOK 1524 AT PAGE 64. [BLANKET IN NATURE - NO CONDITIONS PLOTTABLE - AFFECTS ALL OF PARCEL A ONLY] 10 10. RIGHT-OF-WAY AGREEMENT GRANTED TO THE MOUNTAIN, STATES TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, A COLORADO CORPORATION RECORDED OCTOBER 1, 1975 IN BOOK 2775 AT PAGE 119. [PLOTTED AND SHOWN HEREON) 11. CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO HORIZONTAL AND VERT,'CAL CONTROL BASE MAP RECORDED FEBRUARY 12, 1992 AT RECEPTION NO. 92015075. [BLANKET IN NATURE - NO CONDITIONS PLOTTABLE] 12. THE FOLLOWING MATTERS DISCLOSED BY ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY DATED AUGUST 21, 2013, LAST REVISED DECEMBER 18, 2013, PREPARED BY CAMERON M. WATSON, PLS NO. 38311, FOR AND ON BEHALF OF POINT CONSULTING, LLC, JOB NO. 13.08.049, TO WIT: a. EXISTING ASPHALT AND TRASH ENCLOSURE ENCROACH 0,gTO THE PROPERTY ADJOINING PARCEL A TO THE SOUTH b. RETAINING WALL AND FENCING DO NOT COINCIDE WITH HE BOUNDARY LINES OF SUBJECT PROPERTY. C. TELEPHONE LINE AND PEDESTALS EXIST ON PARCEL A AND ARE NOT LOCATED WITHIN RECORDED EASEMENTS. d. TELEPHONE LINES ARE LOCATED OUTSIDE THE EASEMENT RECORDED IN BOOK 2775 AT PAGE 119. [REFERS TO A PREVIOUS SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERT 1 13. ANY EXISTING LEASES OR TENANCIES, AND ANY AND ALL PARTIES CLAIMING BY, THROUGH OR UNDER SAID LESSEES. [NO CONDITIONS PLOTTABLE] LEGAL DESCRIPTION (COMMITMENT): PARCELA: A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND NO. A300 OF THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, STATE OF COLORADO, PROJECT NO. M361-004 IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTiCGN 29, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORADO, SAID TRACT OR PARCEL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH 530 FEET OF THE WEST 610 FE,€TOF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST, COUNTY OF 1EFFERSC;:N, STATE OF COLORADO, DESCRIBED AS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE 1fY'";;ERSECTION OF WEST 32ND AVENUE AND YOUNGFIELD STREET, THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF WEST 32ND AVENUE, A DISTA+JCE OF 140.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH AT 89 DEGREES 37 MINUTES, A DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET; THENCE WEST AT 90 DEGREES 23 MH UTES, A DISTANCE OF 140.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH AT 89 DEGREES 27 MINUTES, A DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNIING, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE BY DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 15, 1990 AT RECEPTION NO. 90013512. FURTHER EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED 10 FHE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, A HOME RULE CITY OF THE STATE OF COLORADO BY DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 26, 2011 AT RECEPTION NO. 2011096812. PARCEL B: A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND NO. A301 OF THE DEPARTMENT G14 TRANSPORTATION, STATE OF COLORADO, PROJECT NO. M361-004 IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTI')itil 29, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORADO, SAID TRACT OR "ARCEL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST,�,U ARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 200 FEET EAST OF THE WEST LINE OF'THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29, AND 30 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEyT QUARTER OF SAID SECTION, THENCE NORTH 0°51.8' WEST AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OFTHE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION, A DISTANCE OF 150 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°31.2' EAST AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH I.INE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION, 150 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0°51.8' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 150 FEET; THENCE SOUTH c9°31.2' WEST 150 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, A HOME RULE CITY OF THE STATE OF COLORADO BY DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 26, 2011 AT RECEPTION NO 2011096;;4.0. LEGAL DESCRIPTION (AS -SURVEYED A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SI�CTION 29, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF;COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SAID NORTHWESSONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 29 AND CONSIDERING THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SAID NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER TO BEAR S89°29'29"W WITH ALL BEARINf HEREIN RELATIVE THERETO: THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, S89°29'29"W, A DISTANCE OF 972.=51 FEET; THENCE N00°54'01"W, A DISTANCE OF 59.00 FEETTO THE POINT OF;&wINNING; THENCE S89"29'29"W PARALLEL TO AND 59.00 FEET NORTH OF SAID SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 250.68 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIU`rOF 39.50 FEETTHROUGH A CENTRALANGLE OF 8936'53", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 61.78 FEET, HAVING A CHORD WHICH BEARS N45°42'04"W, A DISTANT OF 55.67 FEET; THENCE N00°54'01"W, A DISTANCE OF 81.76 FEET; THENCE N89°29'29"E, A DISTANCE OF 289.91 FEET; THENCE S00°54'01"E, A DISTANCE OF 121.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF E+TFINNING. CONTAINING 34,748 SQUARE FEET OR 0.798 ACRES, MORE OR LESS VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE CERTIFICATION: TO: U.S. RETAIL PARTNERS, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY; AND EACH OF THEIR RESPECTIVE SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP OR PLAT AND THE SURVEY ON WHICH IS IS BASED WERE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2011 MINIMUM STANDARD DETAIL REQUIREMENTS FOR ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEYS, JOINTLY ESTABLISHED AND ADOPTED BY ALTA AND NSPS, AND INCLUDES ITEMS 1, 2, 3, 4, 6(b), 8, 9, 11(b), 13, 16 and 21 OF TABLE A THEREOF. THE FIELD WORK WAS COMPLETED ON MARCH 12, 2015. CAMERON M. WATSON, PLS COLORADO LICENSE NUMBER 38311 FOR AND ON BEHALF OF POINT CONSULTING, LLC 8341 SANGRE DE CRISTO RD, SUITE 102 LITTLEiON, CO 80127 (720)258-6836 cwatson@pnt-Ilc.com SURVEYOR'S NOTES: 1. ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DE=ECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT, MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. 2. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY POINT CONSULTING, LLC. FOR INFORMATPON REGARDING BOUNDARY, EASEMENTS AND TITLE, POINT CONSULTING, LLC RELIED UPON THE FOLLOWING TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY: FILE NO. 01330-56928, EFFECTIVE DATE OF MARCH 12, 2015 AT 5:30 P.M. 3. BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO ASSUMED TO BEAR S 890 29'29" W BETWEEN A 3.25" BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX "LS 13212" AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SAID NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER AND A 3.25" BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX "LS 13212" AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SAID NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER. 4. FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION: ACCORDING TO FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP (F.I.R.M.) NUMBER 0805900194 E, WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF JUNE 17, 2003, THE ENTIRE PROPERTY LIES ENTIRELY, WITHIN THE FOLLOWING ZONE DESIGNATION: ZONE X - AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN. 5. ZONING: THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ZONED C-1, COMMERCIAL -1. MAX HEIGHT: 50' SETBACKS: FRONT: SO' - YOUNGFIELD FRONT: 30'- 32ND PROVIDED BUILDING NOT HIGHER THAN 35' SIDE: 5' PER STORY REAR: 10' PLUS 5' PER EACH ADDITIONAL STORY 6. UNIT OF MEASURE: U.S. SURVEY FOOT 7. OBSERVED PARKING SPACES: NONE. 8. THE UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON WERE LOCATED FROM SURFACE EVIDENCE AND PAINT MARKINGS PROVIDED BY SAFE SITE UTILITY FIELD SERVICES. FOR EXACT LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, POT -HOLING IS RECOMMENDED. THE SURVEYOR HAS NOT PHYSICALLY OR ACTUALLY LOCATED ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. 9. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CONTAINS 34,748 SQUARE FEET OR 0.798 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. 10. PUBLISHED PROPERTY ADDRESS: 3210 YOUNGFIELD STREET & 12755 WEST 32ND AVENUE, WHEAT RIDGE, CO, 80033. 11. PARCEL A HAS DIRECT ACCESS TO BOTH YOUNGFIELD STREET AND W. 32ND AVENUE, PARCEL B HAS DIRECT ACCESS TO W. 32ND AVENUE ONLY. O zw � n cvU � E �� w co o 0 w z co U z __ �OO�v Z�> Lu �U_U0 c wQ� Z—ZN Q LuU-)Z QIL cn0O (iQ0 Lu 3 z z Vi J ? Z t > z C) d - Q Z CC) a - Q M ~ U W Z p O o z -� O c. Oz0OO z �ON0z<Z >wOctNZ J� W�0z<az QQOx 0_r= U3.UU�mOU 7- W Z FW- N I n w O Q O a- ® U Q J ( L 1 ! ul v O w u CL CL UJ co 0Q Ci J u V Q Z W 0 O ; W „;i VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE CERTIFICATION: TO: U.S. RETAIL PARTNERS, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY; AND EACH OF THEIR RESPECTIVE SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP OR PLAT AND THE SURVEY ON WHICH IS IS BASED WERE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2011 MINIMUM STANDARD DETAIL REQUIREMENTS FOR ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEYS, JOINTLY ESTABLISHED AND ADOPTED BY ALTA AND NSPS, AND INCLUDES ITEMS 1, 2, 3, 4, 6(b), 8, 9, 11(b), 13, 16 and 21 OF TABLE A THEREOF. THE FIELD WORK WAS COMPLETED ON MARCH 12, 2015. CAMERON M. WATSON, PLS COLORADO LICENSE NUMBER 38311 FOR AND ON BEHALF OF POINT CONSULTING, LLC 8341 SANGRE DE CRISTO RD, SUITE 102 LITTLEiON, CO 80127 (720)258-6836 cwatson@pnt-Ilc.com SURVEYOR'S NOTES: 1. ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DE=ECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT, MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. 2. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY POINT CONSULTING, LLC. FOR INFORMATPON REGARDING BOUNDARY, EASEMENTS AND TITLE, POINT CONSULTING, LLC RELIED UPON THE FOLLOWING TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY: FILE NO. 01330-56928, EFFECTIVE DATE OF MARCH 12, 2015 AT 5:30 P.M. 3. BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO ASSUMED TO BEAR S 890 29'29" W BETWEEN A 3.25" BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX "LS 13212" AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SAID NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER AND A 3.25" BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX "LS 13212" AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SAID NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER. 4. FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION: ACCORDING TO FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP (F.I.R.M.) NUMBER 0805900194 E, WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF JUNE 17, 2003, THE ENTIRE PROPERTY LIES ENTIRELY, WITHIN THE FOLLOWING ZONE DESIGNATION: ZONE X - AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN. 5. ZONING: THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ZONED C-1, COMMERCIAL -1. MAX HEIGHT: 50' SETBACKS: FRONT: SO' - YOUNGFIELD FRONT: 30'- 32ND PROVIDED BUILDING NOT HIGHER THAN 35' SIDE: 5' PER STORY REAR: 10' PLUS 5' PER EACH ADDITIONAL STORY 6. UNIT OF MEASURE: U.S. SURVEY FOOT 7. OBSERVED PARKING SPACES: NONE. 8. THE UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON WERE LOCATED FROM SURFACE EVIDENCE AND PAINT MARKINGS PROVIDED BY SAFE SITE UTILITY FIELD SERVICES. FOR EXACT LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, POT -HOLING IS RECOMMENDED. THE SURVEYOR HAS NOT PHYSICALLY OR ACTUALLY LOCATED ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. 9. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CONTAINS 34,748 SQUARE FEET OR 0.798 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. 10. PUBLISHED PROPERTY ADDRESS: 3210 YOUNGFIELD STREET & 12755 WEST 32ND AVENUE, WHEAT RIDGE, CO, 80033. 11. PARCEL A HAS DIRECT ACCESS TO BOTH YOUNGFIELD STREET AND W. 32ND AVENUE, PARCEL B HAS DIRECT ACCESS TO W. 32ND AVENUE ONLY. O zw � n cvU � E �� w co o 0 w z co U z __ �OO�v Z�> Lu �U_U0 c wQ� Z—ZN Q LuU-)Z QIL cn0O (iQ0 Lu 3 z z Vi J ? Z t > z C) d - Q Z CC) a - Q M ~ U W Z p O o z -� O c. Oz0OO z �ON0z<Z >wOctNZ J� W�0z<az QQOx 0_r= U3.UU�mOU 7- W Z FW- N I n w O Q O ® U Q J ( L 1 ! ul v O w u CL CL UJ co 0Q Ci J u V Q Z O co O N Z FW- N O n Q Z Q CL O w CL Ci J u V Q Z W 0 O ; O co O N FW- N W UJ n FOUND 3-1/4"DIAM. ALUMINUM CAP IN RANGE BOX, WITH REFERENCE TIES, STAMPED AS SHOWN (ACCEPTED AS NW 1/16 CORNER SEC 29, T. 3 S., R. 69 W.) NW 19951995 I j 7> 089'36 " CHB -545 42'/Y4'E CHL=55,6J" 60a(j T3S R69W 1/4 S30 A S29 2013 PLS 29761 FOUND 3-1/4" DIAM. ALUMINUM CAP IN RANGE BOX, WITH REFERENCE TIES, STAMPED AS SHOWN (ACCEPTED AS W 1/4 CORNER SEC 29, T. 3 S., R. 69 W.) 1322.42' US229 FOUND 3-1/4" DIAM. ALUMINUM CAP IN RANGE BOX, WITH REFERENCE_ TIES, STAMPED AS SHOWN (ACCEPTED AS CW 1/16 CORNER SEC 29, T. 3 S., R. 69 W.) Know Y below. Call before you dig. LM " I ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY SITUATED ONE-QUARTER TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO 8' PSCo. EASEMENT I j REC. NO J0020962 ,= Tew!----tee —� —. =� __ _1f —� TEL SEL TEL EE` a E L (ELTELE EEE _ LET'— EL- ELFT— LE� MAP LEGEND A - _- ¶EL --- TES --r � , ` -n- SIGN __ N892929'E 289.91' — ----� _ 149.97.' 140.00' I L I' QS SA^V';TARY SEWER MANHOLE 1 QD STORM SEWER MANHOLE 0 BOLLARD I x c III iF I„ " ® GAS METER ll II III POWER POLE yI i WV iI I m WATER VALVE PARCEL A PARCEL B " I IIw w y I I E- GUY WIRE ANCHOR 16,610 SQ. FT. 18,138 SQ. FT. I( "o I ® PHONE PEDESTAL/CABINET 0.382 ACRES 0.416 ACRES Q R PROPERTY CORNER I FOUND#5 REBAR WITH RED 3210 Youngfield St 12755 W 32nd Ave C I, N I ! I I PLASTIC CAP STAMPED WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 tB WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 I i Ir P ( w NO BUILDINGS u "POINT L538311" EXCEPT AS SHOWN) NO BUILDINGS PARCEL#: 39-292-00-OIS PARCEL#: 39-292-00-016 iw ,„ > I IIS USE: COMMERCIAL - RETAIL USE. COMMERCIAL - RETAIL SEC[ CORNER ZONING: C-1 (COMMERCIAL -1) W ZONING: C-1 (COMMERCIAL -1) 5'TEtFPHONE EASEMENT BOUNDARY LINE 10 82775 "'P119 INTERNAL 6RNAL PARCEL LINE AS I - ADJACENT PARCEL LINE --- — -- EASEMENT LINE F1 � ssF. I I I I II I SECTION LINE�.+ NONEXCLUSIVE R.OAh "'! w .8.2595 P30S- -_-. —GAS—GAS—GAS—GAS—GAS— GAS LINE r —ELL ELE—ELL --ELE—ELL — ELECTRIC LINE jl DHE DHE-- OPE --GHE OHE— OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE 77' 149.91' n�T` A 10 R a w TEL _ 58929'29"WZ50.68'- - - ti— —.iDEicEiGLinriD FIBER OPTIC LINE _TEL TELTEL---- TEL TE --lig- TEL TEC TEL TEL TE TEL 11 et TEL TE _TEL_ TEL—TEL—LEL— TEL —TEL"'-- iEL4 STM —SiMSTM —STM --STM — SL(�`T,M SEWER LINE --L:L—iEL--TEL—TEL—TEL--iEL -. _ _ —SAN SAN—SAN--SAN—SAN— SANITARY SEWER LINE Tj PARCEL A EXCEP PION PARCEL BEXCEPTION /'O//�� Of BEG/NN/NG \� REG N0. 2011096912 REC. NO. 2011096840 END. BRASS DISK y �— — — �� —VTR—VTR—VTR—VTR—VTR— WA.'ER LINE — ®_ 59.00 & NAIL LS 38311 I 59.00 1 F/0—E/G—F/D— - n-- E/G—F/n—E/n-:"--Fie—=FEo—EAG—fin—iL10—ESD—FiC—FiD=Lie—Lip--r/D—fIa i —_ LD—__rLD—:-E,D® E'n _ESD--E/0—F��1 (B-�D — TEL — TEL — TEL -- TEL — TEL — TELEPHONE LINE _ — _ I (---GAs—GAs— WAIL-SCREEN/RETAINING 1 GAS — GAS — GAS — GAS — GAS — GAS — GAS — — GA 1 GAS --- GAS — 04S — GAS — GAS — GAS GAS ^ GAS — GAS — GAS GPS -- GPS GAS — GAS — GAS — GAS — GAS GAS �_— GAS — GAS — GAS GAS W GAS GRS — GAS I w I W. 32ND AVE. PUBLICR.O.W. VTR VTR— VTR--- VYR— VTR— VTR— "TR VT —VTR-- VTR— 4TR —VTR-- MTR VTR— VTR— VT — VlV14— VTR— VTR— VTR VTR— VTR-�� VTR— VTR— VTR— VTR— MR- ---- R._._RVTR M.— VTR— LTR— VTR— VTR—_ VTR-- VTR VTR— VTR -.,...____ ........ r E EL- — ELE—ELL ELE } - — - r 972.E5!:{1� E— c—Kf— SAN — SAR —ShN SRF{—s SAN SAN— SAN— SAN SAN— SAN SAN— SAN— SAN— SAN349.91 SAN —�—v$AN $AN S892929"W 2644.84' RIM: 5526.57' BAS/SOFBEAR/NGS- -=`_---_'"":---;...�INV E: 5515.92 V��I_S 132 9" CAST? '', C1/4 SEC 29 T3S R69W REST 1989 �— STM — STM — STM — STM — STM — ST STM STM — STM STI r._ 9 M PO/NTOFCOMMENCEMENT FOUND 3-1/4" DIAM. BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX, WITH REFERENCE TIES, STAMPED AS SHOWN (ACCEPTED AS CENTER 1/4 CORNER SEC 29, T. 3 S., R. 69 W.) r O Z N Uj U U '0 O z T- Z N = 0 O� U Z U LU LU LL1 U -«L tJ_1 < tY Q ~Z N CZ W V) Q X00 7Qo LLJ r� > V) Q J J z cy)cc) Q J U ' D O � �Zmz O O 06 wz wNzQ <> OwwcO w Z < LLT Q Z QQO� O=O =�U�UUwmU 5 Lr) I N Z � O Q W W J F--' M o O J � � — Q Q U Z Q < a_ 0 O UJ V) C� >J> O a_ 7 Q c Z u.J [if O 0 O . m O CQ L 5 Lr) I N Z 1W– Q O W W D M o � � Q Z < a_ O UJ a_ U c Z u.J [if 0 O . 5 Lr) I N 1W– Q O W W D M o � � 1 A A( •.0 ° City Of �W heat�idge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29th Ave. Wheat Ridee_ CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2946 F: 303.235.2857 NOTICE TO MINERAL ESTATE OWNERS APPLICANTS: You must submit this completed form to the Community Development Department no later than ten (10) days bethre the public hearing on your application. Failure to complete and submit this Certification of Notice shall constitute sufficient grounds to reschedule your public hearing. f, Will Damrath (Print name) as VP, Regional Officer (Position/Job Title) Regency Centers, L.P. the of/with Managing member of US Retail (Entity applying for permit/approval) (hereinafter, referred to as the "Applicant"), do hereby certify that notice of the application for Specific Development Plan (Describe type of application) set for public hearing on 29_, has been sent to all mineral estate owners at least thirty (30) days before the public hearing, as required by § 2465.5-103(1), C.R.S., or, in the alternative, that the records of the Jefferson County Clerk and Recorder do not identify any mineral estate owners of any portion of the property subject to the above referenced application. s. aCheck here if there are no mineral estate owners of any portion of the subject property. I hereby further certify that I am authorized by the Applicant to make representations contained herein and act as the Applicant's agent for purposes of this Certificate of Notice and bind the Applicant to these representations by my signature below. Dated this 19 day of _March 2015 stewart title Date: March 18, 2015 File Number: 01330-56928 Property: 3210 Youngfield Street, Wheat Ridge, CO 12755 West 32nd Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO Please direct all Title inquiries to: Lynda Rosamond Phone: (303) 780-4012 Email Address: lynda.rosamond@stewart.com OWNER: U.S. Retail Partners, LLC Attn: Eric Chekal Delivery Method: Emailed Stewart Title - Denver Commercial 55 Madison Street, Suite 400 Denver, CO 80206 SURVEYOR: Point Consulting, LLC Attn: Cameron Watson Delivery Method: Emailed We Appreciate Your Business and Look Forward to Serving You in the Future. ALTA Commitment (6/17/06) ALTA Commitment Form COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Issued by STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, a Texas Corporation ("Company"), for a valuable consideration, commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the Proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges and compliance with the Requirements; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions of this Commitment. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the Proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A by the Company. All liability and obligation under this Commitment shall cease and terminate six months after the Effective Date or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue the policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. The Company will provide a sample of the policy form upon request This Commitment shall not be valid or binding until countersigned by a validating officer or authorized signatory IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Stewart Title Guaranty Company has caused its corporate name and seal to be affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A. Countersigned by: Auth riz C o__u_ntersi6 nature Stewart Title - Denver Commercial 55 Madison Street, Suite 400 Denver, CO 80206 (303)331-0333 Stewart title guaranty company Q`1 1. \ILE G1j4 3� c•OpP eRIn, y� W _ � 1908 rrxas . Matt Morris President and CEO Denise C rraux Secretary Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. AMI RICAN All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. LAND n tl l File No. 01330-56928 —1.I 10% 004 -UN ALTA Commitment (6/17/06) -ar CONDITIONS 1. The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquired actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and Conditions and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 3. This Commitment is a contract to issue one or more title insurance policies and is not an abstract of title or a report of the condition of title. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. i. The policy to be issued contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is $2, 000, 000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. You may review a copy of the arbitration rules at< htto://www alta orp/>. All notices required to be given the Company and any statement in writing required to be furnished the Company shall be addressed to it at P.O. Box 2029, Houston, Texas 77252. Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. AMERICAN All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the Amencan Land Title Association. [ANN T1111 IA File No. 01330-56928 -Mf I()N 004 -UN ALTA Commitment (6/17/06)tic. COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A File No.: 01330-56928 1. Effective Date: March 12, 2015, at 5:30 PM 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: Amount of Insurance (a) A.L.T.A. Owner's Policy Proposed Insured: (b) A.L.T.A. Loan Policy Proposed Insured: 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is: Fee Simple 4. Title to the referenced estate or interest in said land is at the effective date hereof vested in: U.S. Retail Partners, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 5. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: See Attached Legal Description Purported Address: STATEMENT OF CHARGES 3210 Youngfield Street These charges are due and payable Wheat Ridge, CO before a policy can be issued 12755 West 32nd Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO Commercial Rate: To Be Determined Commitment Fee**: $500.00 Extra Parcel Fee $100.0C (Schedule Nos. 0214036 and 021403 ) ** Will be applied to premium if policy issued. Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. -_ The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. File No. 01330-56928 Page 1 of 3 STEWART TITLE CO STG ALTA Commitment Sch A STO GUARANTY COMPANY SCHEDULE A LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A: A tract or parcel of land No. A300 of the Department of Transportation, State of Colorado, Project No. M361-004 in the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 29, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, in Jefferson County, Colorado, said tract or parcel being more particularly described as follows: That portion of the South 530 feet of the West 610 feet of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 29, Township 3 South, Range 69 West, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, described as: BEGINNING at a point on the Northeast corner of the intersection of West 32nd Avenue and Youngfield Street, thence East along the North line of West 32nd Avenue, a distance of 140.00 feet; thence North at 89 degrees 37 minutes, a distance of 150.00 feet; thence West at 90 degrees 23 minutes, a distance of 140.00 feet; thence South at 89 degrees 27 minutes, a distance of 150.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING therefrom that portion conveyed to the City of Wheat Ridge by deed recorded February 15, 1990 at Reception No. 90013512. FURTHER EXCEPTING therefrom that portion conveyed to the City of Wheat Ridge, a home rule city of the State of Colorado by deed recorded October 26, 2011 at Reception No 2011096812. PARCEL B: A tract or parcel of land No. A301 of the Department of Transportation, State of Colorado, Project No. M361-004 in the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 29, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, in Jefferson County, Colorado, said tract or parcel being more particularly described as follows: That part of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 29, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, described as follows: BEGINNING at a point 200 feet East of the West line of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 29, and 30 feet North of the South line of the Northwest quarter of said Section, thence North 0051.8' West and parallel with the West line of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section, a distance of 150 feet; thence North 890 31.2' East and parallel with the South line of the Northwest quarter of said Section, 150 feet; thence South 00 51.8' East, a distance of 150 feet; thence South 890 31.2' West 150 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING therefrom that portion conveyed to the City of Wheat Ridge, a home rule city of the State of Colorado by deed recorded October 26, 2011 at Reception No 2011096840. Said Parcels A and B are also known as: A parcel of land situated in the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 29, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, in Jefferson County, Colorado, being more particularly described as follows.- COMMENCING ollows: COMMENCING at the Southwest corner of the said Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 29 from whence the center of Section 29 bears N 89° 31'42" E, a distance of 1322.42 feet with all bearings herein relative thereto; Thence N 000 51'48" W along the West line of the said Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 29, a Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. i The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. —IRRAN All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. 1"D TIM File No. 01330-56928 Page 2 of 3 STEWART TITLE CO STG ALTA Commitment Sch A STO GUARANTY COMPANY' distance of 180.00 feet; Thence N 890 31'42" E, a distance of 60.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, said point being on the East right-of-way for Youngfield Street; Thence N 890 31'42" E, a distance of 289.91 feet to a point on the Westerly boundary of Lot 1, Applewood Village Shopping Center Subdivision recorded at Reception No F0193712 in the office of the Clerk and Recorder for Jefferson County; Thence S 000 51'48" E along said West line, a distance of 121.00 feet to a point on the North right-of-way for W. 32nd Ave.; Thence the following two courses along said North right-of-way; 1. S 890 31'42", a distance of 250.68 feet to a point of tangent curvature; 2. Along the arc of a 39.50 foot radius curve to the right through an angle of 890 36' 53", an arc distance of 61.78 feet having a chord that bears N 45' 39' 51" W, a distance of 55.67 feet to a point on the said East right-of-way for Youngfield Street; Thence N 00° 51'48" W along said right-of-way, a distance of 81.76 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; County of Jefferson, State of Colorado L,opyngm wuo-[uuy American Lana I itle Association. All rights reserved. - The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. Allother uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. iwrw ini File No. 01330-56928 Page 3 of 3 STEWART TITLE CO STG ALTA Commitment Sch A STO GUARANTY COMPANY COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE B PART I File No.: 01330-56928 The following are the requirements to be complied with: 1. Payment to or for the account of the grantor(s) or mortgagor(s) of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. 2. Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record. 3. NOTE: This product is for informational purposes only. It is not a title insurance product and does not provide any form of coverage. This product is not a guarantee or assurance and does not warrant, or otherwise insure any condition, fact or circumstance. This product does not obligate this Company to issue any policies of title insurance for any subsequent transaction based on the information provided or involving the property described herein. The limit of liability of Stewart Title Company for any causes of action directly or indirectly related to the search service shall be, in the total amount, limited to the charge paid under this agreement, $500.00, or $2,000, whichever is greater. NOTE: This commitment is issued for informational purposes only at the request of Eric Chekal. Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the dale of use. All .,her uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. File No. 01330-56928 CO STG ALTA Commitment Sch B I Page 1 of 1 STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE B PART II File No.: 01330-56928 Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession, not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the Effective Date but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof: (c) Minerals of whatsoever kind, subsurface and surface substances, in, on, under and that may be produced from the Land, together with all rights, privileges, and immunities relating thereto, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b) or (c) are shown by the Public Records or listed in Schedule B. 7. Water rights, claims or title to water. 8. Any and all unpaid taxes and assessments and any unredeemed tax sales. 9. Reservation of oil, gas, and other minerals contained in Warranty Deed recorded September 24, 1962 in Book 1524 at Page 64. (Affects Parcel A) NOTE: The Company makes no representation as to the present ownership of any such interests. There may be leases, grants, exceptions or reservations of interests that are not listed. 10. Right -of -Way Agreement granted to The Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company, a Colorado corporation recorded October 1, 1975 in BQok 2775 at Page 119. (Affects Parcel B) 11. City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado Horizontal and Vertical Control Base Map recorded February 12, 1992 at Reception No. 92015075. 12. The following matters disclosed by ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey dated August 21, 2013, last revised December 18, 2013, prepared by Cameron M. Watson, PLS No. 38311, for and on behalf of Point Consulting, LLC, as Job Number 13.08.049, to wit: a) Existing asphalt and trash enclosure encroach onto the property adjoining Parcel A to the South. b) Retaining wall and fencing do not coincide with the boundary lines of subject property. c) Telephone line and pedestals exist on Parcel A and are not located within recorded easements. d) Telephone lines are located outside the easement recorded in Book 2775 at Page 119. 13. Any existing leases or tenancies, and any and all parties claiming by, through or under said lessees. NOTE: The present ownership of the leaseholds created by said leases, if any, referenced above and other matters affecting the interest of the lessees are not shown herein. Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. - The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. �rtuc�w All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. isra level File No. 01330-56928 Page 1 of 2 STEWART TITLE 0. CO STG ALTA Commitment Sch B 11 STO GUARANTY COMPANY COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE B PART II Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. ., All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the Amencan Land Title Association File No, 01330-56928 Page 2 of 2 STEWART TITLE CO STG ALTA Commitment Sch B II STO GUARANTY COMPANY' Stewart Title - Denver Commercial MINERAL DISCLOSURE To comply with the provisions of C.R.S. 10-11-123, the Company makes the following disclosure: a. That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate and that there is a substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and b. That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner's permission. NOTE: THIS DISCLOSURE APPLIED ONLY IF SCHEDULE B, SECTION 2 OF THE TITLE COMMITMENT HEREIN INCLUDES AN EXCEPTION FOR SEVERED MINERALS. File Number: 01330-56928 Page 1 of 1 CO Disclosures Comrcl WI-I1N RECORDED, RETURN TO: WARRANTY DEED (Jefferson Counly, Colorado) 2013145574 12/20/2013 2:23 PM PGS 6 $36.00 DF $0.00 Electronically Recorded Jefferson County. CO Pam Anderson. Clerk and Recorder TD1000 Y 6%7-3114 � STATE OF COLORADO § § KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS. COLIMI'Y OF JEFFERSON § That LONGS PEAK METROPOLITAN DISTRICT, a quasi -municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Colorado ("Grantor"), for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration to it in hand paid by U.S. RETAIL PARTNERS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (" ant whose address is set forth below, has GRANTED, SOLD and CONVEYED, and by these presents does hereby GRANT, BARGAIN, SELL and CONVEY, unto Grantee all of the real property situated in Jefferson County, Colorado and more particularly described on Exhibit A. which is attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes, and any improvements located on such real property, together with Grantor's rights, titles and interests in and to any and all rights, benefits, privileges, easements, tenements, and appurtenances thereon and pertaining thereto, including all of Grantor's right, title and interest in and to any adjacent streets, roads, alleys, easements and rights-of-way (collectively, the "Property"), subject, however, only to thuse utatlers sct forth on Exhibit B attached licretu and made a part hereof fur all purposes (the "Permitted Exceptions"). TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Property unto Grantee and its successors and assigns forever IN FEE SIMPLE; and Grantor does hereby bind itself and its successors and assigns to WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND all and singular the Property unto Grantee and successors and assigns against every person whomsoever lawfully claiming or to claim the same, or any part thereof, by, through or under Grantor, but not otherwise, subject to the Permitted Exceptions. (SIGNATURE PAGE IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWS) (00085211) Gardae0l - 6391949v.1 SKLD, Inc. SW SKL13503 JF 145574-2013.001 IN WITNESS �N%IEREOF, this Special Warranty Deed has been executed by Grantor to be effective as of the ,day of December, 2013. GRANTOR: LONGS PEAK METROPOLITAN DISTRICU, a quasi -municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Colorado /7 .17 1 STATE OF COLORADO COUNTYOF This instlum �t was acknowledged before me, on this f day of Decembcr, 2013, by Lr. �// �_S. r s1of LONGS PEAK METROPOLITAN DISTRICT, aquasi-municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Colorado. CASSANDRA THOMAS NOTARY PUBLIC ST LORAD Grantcc's Address: U.S. Retail Partners, LLC 8480 East Orchard Road, Suite 6900 Greenwood Village, Colorado SUI l l {00085211} Girdas0l - 6391949v.1 SKLD, Inc. SW SKL13503 JF 145574-2013.002 Notary Public Signature My commission expires:AZI, EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (00085211) UwdaWl-6391949v.1 SKLD, Inc. SW SKL13503 JF 145574-2013.003 Legal Description PARCEL A: A tract or parcel of land No. A300 of the Department of Transportation, State of Colorado, Project No. M361-004 in the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 29, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, in Jefferson County, Colorado, said tract or parcel beaig more particularly described as follows. - That portion of the South 530 feet of the West 610 feet of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 29, Township 3 South, Range 69 West, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, described as: BEGINNING at a point on the Northeast corner of the intersection of West 32"1 Avenue and Youngfield Street, thence East along the North line of West 32' Avenue, a distance of 140.00 feet; thence North at 89 degrees 37 minutes, a distance of 150.00 feet; thence West at 90 degrees 23 minutes, a distance of 140.00 feet; thence South at 89 degrees 27 minutes, a distance of 150.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING therefrom that portion conveyed to the City of Wheat Ridge by deed recorded February 15, 1990 at Reception No. 90013512, FURTHER EXCEPTING t1wefrom that portion conveyed to the City of Wheat Ridge, a home rule city of the State of Colorado by deed recorded October 26, 2011 at R_ eception No. 2011096812. PARCEL B: A tract or parcel of land No. A301 of the Department of Transportation, State of Colorado, Project No. M361-004 in the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 29, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, in Jefferson County, Colorado, said tract or parcel beuig more particularly described as follows: That part of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 29, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, described as follows: BEGINNING at a point 200 feet East of the West line of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 29, and 30 feet North of the South line of the Northwest quarter of said Section, thence North 0°5l .8' West and parallel with the West line of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section, a distance of 150 feet; thence North 89" 31.2' East and parallel with the South line of the Northwest quarter of said Section, 150 feet; thence South 0" 51.8' East, a distance: of 150 feet; thence South 890 31.2' West 150 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. SKLD, Inc. SW SKL13503 JF 145574-2013.004 EXCEPTING therefrom that portion conveyed to the City of Wheat Ridge, a home rule city of the State of Colorado by deed recorded October 26, 2011 at Reception No 2011096840. Said Parcels A and B are also known as: A parcel of land situated in the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 29, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, in Jefferson County, Colorado. being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the Southwest corner of the said Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 29 from whence the center of Section 29 bears N 891 31' 42" E, a distance of 1322.42 feet with all beatings herein relative thereto; Thence N 00° 5 P 48" W along the West line of the said Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 29, a distance of 180.00 feet; Thence N 890 31' 42" E. a distance of 60.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, said point being on the East right-of-way for Yotmgfield Street; Thence N 89° 31 ' 42" E, a distance of 289.91 feet to a point on the Westerlv boundary of Lot 1. Applewood Village Shopping Center Subdivision recorded at Reception No. F0193712 in the office of the Clerk and Recorder for Jefferson County-, Thence S 001 51' 48" E along said West tine, a distance of 121.00 feet to a point on the North right-of-way for W. 32"1 Ave.; Thence the following two courses along said North right-of-way; 1. S 89' 31 ' 42", a distance of 250.68 feet to a point of tangent curvature; 2. Along the are of a 39.50 foot radius curve to the right through an angle of 89° 36' 53", an arc distance of 61.78 feet having a chord that bears N 45° 39' 51" W, a distance of 55.67 feet to a point on the said East right-of-way for Youngfield Street; Thence N 00° 5 P 48" W along said right-of-way, a distance of 81.76 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING: County of Jefferson, State of Colorado SKLD, Inc. SW SKL13503 JF 145574-2013.005 EXHIBIT B PERMITTED EXCEPTIONS 1. Reservation of oil, gas, and other minerals contained in Warranty Deed recorded September 24, 1962 in Book 1524 at Page 64. (Affects Parcel A) 2. Right -of -Way Agreement granted to The Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company, a Colorado corporation recorded October 1, 1975 in Book 2775 at Page 119, as shown of Survey dated August 21, 2013, last revised December 18, 2013, prepared by Cameron M. Watson, PLS No. 38311, for and on behalf of Point Consulting, LLC, Job No. 13.08.049. (Affects Parcel B) 3. City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado Horizontal and Vertical Control Base Map recorded February 12, 1992 at Reception No, 92015075. C"de e0I - 6391%9v. I SKLD, Inc. SW SKL13503 JF 145574-2013.006 City of W heat �idge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Wheat Ridge Community Development Department PRE -APPLICATION MEETING SUMMARY Meeting Date: January 15, 2015 Applicant: Owen Keenan, PE Sterling Design Associates, LLC 2009 W. Littleton Blvd., #300 Littleton, CO 80120 303.794.4727 ext.206 Owen(-a,Sterlin DesignAssociates.com Jay M. Newell, PE, Principal Sterling Design Associates, LLC 2009 W. Littleton Blvd., #300 Littleton, CO 80120 303.794.4727 ext.203 Jg3gSterlingDesimiAssociates.com Eric Chekal Regency Centers 8480 E. Orchard Rd, Suite 6900 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 303.300.5335 EricChekalO,RegencyCenters.com Attending Staff: Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner Sara White, Planner II Joshua Botts, Planner I Mark Westberg, Design Supervisor Dave Brossman, Development Review Manager Steve Art, Economic Development Manager Specific Site Location: 3210 Youngfield and 12755 W. 32nd Avenue Existing Zoning: Planned Commercial Development (PCD) Existing Comp. Plan: Mixed -Use Commercial/Neighborhood Commercial Existing Site Conditions: The site includes two properties which are located at 3210 Youngfield and 12755 W. 32nd Avenue. The properties are zoned Planned Commercial Development (PCD), and surrounding parcels include a mix of Planned Commercial Development (PCD), Agriculture -1 (A-1), and Neighborhood - Commercial (N -C). Regency Centers recently applied to consolidate the subject lots and the surrounding properties into Applewood Village Shopping Center PCD. To the north are parcels zoned PCD, which uses include: Chili's Restaurant, Wells Fargo Bank, and a retail -oriented commercial strip. Beyond these parcels to the north and east are associated Applewood Village Shopping Center properties zoned PCD. The primary buildings are Applejack Wine and Spirits and a former Wells Fargo bank to the east. The parcels to the south of W. 32nd Avenue are zoned PCD, and are used as a Walgreen's pharmacy and First Bank. To the west is the I-70 corridor which is zoned Agriculture -1 (A-1). Currently existing on the subject parcels are a vacant gas station and small commercial strip center. According to the Jefferson County Assessor the two lots added together equal 34,678 square feet. The properties are owned by Regency Centers, Acquisition, LLC. Regency Centers obtained a Special Use Permit (SUP) to allow for a drive-through on the property. At this time the applicant has identified Starbucks as a tenant. Applicant/Owner Preliminary Proposal: The applicant has proposed a 2,500 square foot Starbucks Cafe and drive-through. Access to the site will be from the existing Apple Jacks' drive and right in only access along W.32nd Avenue, which includes a right -out only egress onto Youngfield Street. The building has been positioned to screen the drive-through lane from both W.32"d Avenue. The site provides ample off-street parking and drive-through stacking of up to eleven cars before on-site circulation is affected. Landscape areas will utilize colorful and textural low water demand plantings, sod, and a blend of deciduous and evergreen trees. The building design utilizes a variety of materials including stone, brick, glass, stucco, and structural steel canopies. The building mass contains varied roof lines and multiple horizontal/vertical wall planes. Site architectural features include a refuse enclosure and low screen walls, all of which are designed to complement the character and materials of the proposed building. The proposed building's setbacks off Youngfield Street is equal to the existing Chili's building setbacks on the adjacent property to the north. The setback to the north property line will be 19', 163'to the east, and 59.2' to the south. A drive-through will run along the north property line, between the proposed building and the existing Chili's Restaurant. Parking will be on the W. 32"d Avenue side of the lot with landscape buffering and a screen wall. A No access to the site is being proposed to the north of the site. An outdoor covered patio and landscape improvements are proposed on the plan. Pedestrian circulation will be connected to the Applewood Village shopping center by a walkway connection to an Apple Jacks' drive, and to the street sidewalk along Youngfield Street. 2 Will a neighborhood meeting need to be held prior to application submittal:' No, a neighborhood meeting is required for a Specific Development Plan application. Planning Division comments: The following items were discussed based on the applicant's proposal: Zoning The property is zoned Planned Commercial Development (PCD). Each Planned Development has its own list of permitted uses and development standards. There are two distinct steps in establishing a planned development. Step one is approval of an outline development plan (ODP) that establishes the planned development zoning designation, permitted uses, underlying development parameters, and general design concepts. Step two is approval of a specific development plan (SDP) to provide specific site plans, building elevations, and civil documents. The SDP and ODP are both approved at public hearing. The applicant is proposing a drive-through facility for the proposed Starbucks. According to Sec.26- 633 of the City Code, any use or development proposing a motor vehicle drive-through shall be required to obtain a special use permit (SUP). Special uses are those which may or may not be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and require special review to ensure potential impacts will be minimized. An SUP application has been approved for a drive-thru at 3210 Youngfield Street. Architectural and Site Design Manual The City's Architectural and Site Design Manual (ASDM) provides guidance related to the site and building design of new commercial, industrial, mixed-use and multi -family development. The site at 3210 Youngfield and 12755 W. 32"d Avenue is located in the Contemporary Overlay District in the ASDM. Chapter 2.2 of the ASDM states that: The Contemporary Overlay District applies on commercial corridors where a walkable environment is desired but where greater flexibility for the placement of buildings and parking lots is sensible. It promotes site design that makes buildings visible from the street but utilizes a greater build -to range than the traditional overlay. Regency Centers has filed a variance request on the build -to standard. Chapter 3 of the ASDM includes guidance related to site design, and includes standards relating to pedestrian connectivity, building placement build -to areas, parking placement, and screening buffers. Chapter 4 includes building design standards for commercial/retail and mixed-use buildings. The proposed site plan shows an outdoor patio located on the west end of the building. Staff has requested that the patio be rotated to the east side of the building to make the building closer to the build -to line and create greater functionality. 3 Signage The applicant has proposed a multi -tenant sign on the southwest corner of the site. The City only allows signs to be located on the lot which they advertise. A Master Sign Plan by Applewood Village Center could potentially allow for a multiple tenant sign and address individual business identification. The intent and purpose of a Master Sign Plan is to encourage well-planned and designed signage within a large multiple -building or multiple -use complex which expresses unification and integration by elements of architectural style, size, color, placement and lighting while at the same time allowing for reasonable individual business identification. For more information related to the Master Sign Plan requirements please see Chapter 26, Article 7 of the City Code. Connectivity The proposed site plan shows one pedestrian access location along Youngfield Street and one access along the Apple Jacks' drive. Staff has requested that a pedestrian access be added along W. 32nd Avenue to accommodate the bus stop and all other pedestrian traffic. Building Division comments: The building division was not present and has no comments at this time. Public Works comments: The following items were discussed based on the applicant's proposal: Public Improvements When new properties are created in the city through the subdivision process, staff reviews the proposal based on current standards. In addition to ensuring that new parcels meets minimum lot size and width standards, staff also confirms that adjacent street improvements meet current roadway design and drainage standards. In order to promote high-quality multi -modal streets throughout Wheat Ridge, the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan establishes design standards for the City's bike/pedestrian routes. W. 32nd Avenue is identified in the plan as a bicycle route. When a new subdivision is platted along bike routes, right-of-way dedication and/or installation of streetscape improvements are typically required. Since additional Right -of Way (ROW) dedications will be required along all street frontages of the shopping center and which extend beyond the bounds of this project, the ROW dedications for this project may be completed during the replat of the entire Applewood Village Shopping Center. A reference to the larger plat dedications can then be made on the consolidation plat specific to the project. 4 Circulation Use of Apple Jack's loading access to W. 32nd Avenue as a main drive creates a conflict with Apple Jacks loading. Because of this potential conflict staff has requested the applicant obtain the data from Apple Jacks on loading times. If the Apple Jack's loading access is used, staff has requested to see plans of what the drive improvements would be to support the traffic created by the applicant. On site, the right only egress onto Youngfield Street supports both the parking lot and drive-through. Staff has requested the applicant place a stop sign where the parking lot traffic intersects with the drive- through traffic. Drainage A Drainage Letter signed and sealed by a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Colorado, shall be required. For more detail related to the Drainage Letter and plan see the attached Public Works memo. Process The first step in the process began with the pre -application meeting on January 15, 2014. The next step will be to proceed with the approval of a Specific Development Plan. After the pre -application meeting, a formal application may be submitted. Please refer to the SDP Checklist for all submittal requirements; staff is unable to accept incomplete applications. Applications must be submitted BY APPOINTMENT with a planner. When the application is submitted, a staff planner will be assigned to handle the case. This person is the project manager for the case and will be the contact at the City throughout the entire zone change process. The case manager will review the submittal application for content. If all submittal requirements have been met, the proposal will be referred to outside service agencies (Xcel Energy, water district, fire district, etc.) and other City agencies (Public Works, Economic Development, etc.) for their review and comment, generally for a period of 15 days. After all comments have been received, the case manager will forward those to the applicant. Modifications to the Outline Development Plan document may be required as a result of these comments. Once all comments and requirements have been met, the SDP application can be scheduled for public hearing in front of Planning Commission. The same requirements for adjacent landowner notification and posting will be followed as for the ODP public hearings. The case manager will prepare a staff report which will be presented at the Planning Commission public hearing. There is a specific set of criteria used to evaluate a specific development plan (see Section 26-305.D. of the zoning and development code). A recommendation to Planning Commission will be made in the staff report based on these criteria, and the staff report with recommendations will be presented at the public hearing. Planning Commission is the final authority for an SDP submitted separate from and subsequent to an approved ODP. Within 60 days of approval, a blackline mylar of the SDP with original signatures must be provided to the City for recording with the Jefferson County Clerk & Recorder's office. 5 Utility Providers The City of Wheat Ridge is not a full-service city. The utility and service providers for this property include: • Consolidated Mutual Water District: 303-238-0451 • Northwest Lakewood Sanitary District: 303-987-0655 Wheat Ridge Fire District #2: 303-403-5900 Attachments: Public Works memo, ASDM, SDP Process, Master Sign Plan Phone Numbers Meredith Reckert — Senior Planner 303-235-2848 Sara White — Planner II 303-235-2852 Joshua Botts — Planner 1 303-235-2849 Steve Art — Economic Development Manager 303-235-2806 Mark Westberg — Design Supervisor 303-235-2863 Dave Brossman — Development Review Manager 303-235-2864 31 City of �"�Wh6atRjdjcye LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION Community Development Department 7500 West 29h Avenue • Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 a Phone (303) 235-2846 (Please print or type all information) g�c G1E:KAt- W Applicant VACF_wV CE►J O-5', L.P. Address 1420 E,lXrcK" pb M 6900 Phone 303-300-5335' City G9kCNVJu0D VILAAGA State Co Zip gold Fax Owner {l.5, E -'Tk(- PALTriM Address WOO E. c9f1Aa-b Z8 S(E 67W Phone 3a3-300-MS3 City 6RtE4.UK,5 V«tAG6 State c0 Zip go 1(t Fax 303-681-6905' Contact ERA, CNEr-AL Address '�1*0 E oKHAWj pp STC 69ov Phone 303'3 '5335 City State (,p Zip rgellt Faxes -6g/ -CVS' (The person listed as contact will be contacted to answer questions regarding this application, provide additional information when necessary, post public hearing signs, will receive a copy of the staff report prior to Public Hearing; and shall be responsible for forwarding all verbal and written communication to applicant and owner,) I275S LJ_ 32-A Arfi,C WHET fLt% co TOC63 Location of request (address): 3V o YovaraRrt D S A#wAT mou . t0 8W33 "Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request): Please refer to submittal checklists for complete application requirtments; incomplete applications will not be accepted Q Change of zone or zone conditions C1 Special Use Permit O Subdivision: Minor (5 lots or less) Cl Consolidation Plat 0 Conditional Use Permit O Subdivision: Major (More than 5 lots) LT Flood Plain Special Exception O Site Pian approval O Temporary Use, Building, Sign 6 Lot Line Adjustment Cl Concept Pian approval ® Variance/Waiver (from Section 24-t(Or } Planned Building Group O Right of Way Vacation O Other: Detailed description of request: Mw A /0" Ao1*Ait9rttAT/bF yA,uAW Tp 1W 2o' 8v1`6_,ro Required information: 39 -2M - Co - D t5' Assessors Parcel Number: 39-Zt2 -00-016 Size of Lot (acres or square footage): d %f] Ar— Current Zoning: pCA Proposed Zoning:_pW Current Use: l(A[AWr Proposed Use: /ZC-rg(c_._ L certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and carred to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persotLs listed ahmv. ithout iv resent the re ed action cmtnot !aa fully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners must submit pmreaVW1lortreyfro a ner chic approved o coon on his behalf. Notarized Signature of Applicant State of Colorado } County of Ac&oLht>. MYERS The foregoing instrument (Land Use Processing Application) was acknowledged ss CNOTARARRIE J. UBLIC NOTARY Pt18LiC by me this 6� day of &!60iLf 20 115 by r; tr Ch t /C J STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID 20084041189 MY COMM18910N EXPIRES 12/0 /2016 Notary Public Nvly commission expires 12- /0�/20_Ltg To be filled out by staff: Date received �1 S Fee $ 200 Receipt No. CD 3 d /ZI 19CaseNo. Comp Plan Design. Zoning Quarter Section Map Related Case No. Pre -App Mtg. Date _ Case Manager City of ]9rWh6atfZjidlye LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION Community Development Department 7500 West 29"' Avenue • Wheat Rid a CO 80033 a P g 9 hone (303) 235-2846 RIC CHE<cAl- Got (Please print or type all information) Applicant RW0CY (6070-5, G.? Address V410 E,OURACD P!D STIc 4%V Phone 303400 -SPP City 6REENbJ•xt, V t.LAGE State (n _Zip $all 1 Fax 3e3 (,41-6fa,' Owner U.S. Zeta/c.. R127NW Address 90 E. ca2CHA�0 1Q0 ST6 aw Phone City G¢�,r«,o V,,,A6+ State cc Zip 8oltl Fax 303-0r-61oi Contact f�ei e. C64 6 tAL Address M E. AW10J 40 fTF `%ov- ,., - Mf City GLtiE*4�taop V c.t-�w6 State Co Zip 3 3 � Zip frolll Fax (The person listed as contact will be contacted to answer questions regarding this application, provide additional information when nece public hearing signs, will receive a copy of the staff report prior to Public Hearing, and shall be responsible for forwarding all verbal and zssaryy,ost post communication to applicant and owner.)written 1Z7SS w. 32t4 Avr<A-t- WK -Ai 2196E (® 8tZ;0 Location of request (address): 3210 Ya/a6fl&.b 5TtEET, I.. -HW t1W (v ??wJ3 Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request): Please refs to submittal checklists for complete application requirements; incompldte appllcadons will not be accepted 0 Change of zone or zone conditions D Special Use Permit 13 Subdivision: Minor (5 lots or less) O Consolidation Plat D Conditional Use Permit O Subdivision: Major (More than 5 lots) O Flood Plain Special Exception O Site Plan approval Cl Temporary Use, Building, Sign O Lot Line Adjustment O Concept Plan approval O Variance/Waiver (from Section O Planned Building Group Cl Right of Way Vacation 10 Other:ACUAC DMr-wPMFI,tf PGIirJ Detailed description of request: VCV &W PM 6,,X OF A Z, 5W rd F G?dt FTA"&,Ck5 CAFE w t iN Required information: W-7-41-oo-o1S" Assessors Parcel Number: 34' Z'7Z - ot7 - o t L Size of Lot (acres or square footage): 0. ?4'7 4Le, Current Zoning:&1p Proposed Zoning: PW Current Use: dAtAA7r Proposed Use: R,4rAte— ICertify that the information and exhibit herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my latowledge and that infiling this a /kation, I am actin with the knowledge i n8 PP g dge and consent of those persons listed shalt, without whose consent th quested action cannot lawfully be accomplished Applicants other than owners must submit power-off-a7uornn"from thponer whi ro of this action on his behalf. Notarized Signature of Applicant State of Colorado County of C e } ss The foregoing instrument Land Use Processing Application) was acknowledged by me this)I_day of 1 arca 20JS- by jg�f'i C CJ) ek.,L / NotaryPublics My commission expires 14 1921 /20 /V To be filled out by stat : Date received ZS Comp Plan Design. Related Case No. CARRIE J. MYERS NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID 20084041189 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 12j0912016 Fee S Receipt No.W1%IeD q Case No. W7--Lt--OZ— Quarter 7--Lt— O L Quarter Section Map� _Case ManagerZO1nn Pre -App Mtg. Dae Case No. \A/Z1502 Date Received 3/25/2015 Related Cases MS1501 Case Planner Reckert Case DescripliorSpecific Development Plan for a Starbucks Cafe with a drive-through Applrcan/ /nfavmafi air Name Regency Centers, L.P. Name Phone (303) 300-5335 Address 8480 E. Orchard Rd., Suite 6900 City Greenwood Village State CO Zip 80111- Ow. -ear lirlvimahoarr Name U.S. Retail Partners Name Phone (303) 300.5335 Address 8480 E. Orchard Rd., Suite 6900 City Greenwood Village State CO Zip '80111- Cowlacl !r/o�m�Yiarr Name Eric Chekal Name Phone (303) 300.5335 Address 8480 E. Orchard Rd., Suite 6900 City Greenwood Village State CO Zip' 80111- P/-Oarcf !r/orma/rovr Address ,3210 Street Youngfield St. & 12755 W. 32nd Ave. City Wheat Ridge State CO Zip 80033 (� Location Description Project Name Regency Centers Parcel No Qtr Section District No Parcel No. 39.292.00.015 Qtr Section: NW29 District No.: III 3929200015 NW29 3 17 3929200016 NW29 3 favrcwx Pre -App Date 12/29/2014 Neighborhood Meeting Date App No: 4PP1455 Review Type Review Body Review Date Disposition Comments Report 'Review PC 1.1 1.1 I FMI 0®,' DlxpPxfl/C? Case Disposition 0 Disposition Date Conditions of Approval , Notes Status 'Open 0 Res q Ord q Storage: 0 City of Wheat Ridge 03/25/2@ij 16:16 CDBA ZONING APPLICATION FEES/3216 YOUNGFIELD ST. CDABII164 AMOUNT FMSD ZONING APPLICATION FEES 366.06 PAYntiif RECEIVED ANOUNT CHECK: 2099 -1►36. 00 TOTAL 368.66