The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWA-15-15City of Wheat pidge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29`x' Ave. September 1, 2016 Charles A. Persichitte 12025 W. 34th Place Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 RE: Case No. WA -15-15 Mr. Persichitte, Wheat Ridge. CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 This letter is in regard to your request for approval of a 16 -foot variance from the 25 -foot side yard setback requirement when adjacent to a public street. The initial application was filed with the Community Development Department on September 10, 2015. The last activity on the application was a phone call in early March 2016 stating you did not wish to bring the case forward to the Board of Adjustment for their March 24, 2016 meeting date, and referenced not moving forward with the application at all at that time. It is departmental policy that if no action occurs on an open case file within sixty days, the case can be closed. Subsequent action on the property will constitute a new application. Please contact me at 303-235-2849 if you have any questions. Thank you, Zack Wallace Planning Technician hN N.6%hcatridgc.co.us 1W SVr City Of Wh6atP,Ldge CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DMSION STAFF REPORT TO: Community Development Director DATE: February 29, 2016 CASE MANAGER: Zack Wallace CASE NO. & NAME: WA -15-15 / Persichitte ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a 16 -foot (64%) variance from the 25 -foot side yard setback requirement when adjacent to a public street on property located at 12025 W. 34' Place and zoned Residential -One A (R -IA) LOCATION OF REQUEST: 12025 W. 34"' Place APPLICANT (S): OWNER (S): APPROXIMATE AREA: PRESENT ZONING: PRESENT LAND USE: Charles A. Persichitte Charles and Lisa Persichitte 11,224 Square Feet (0.258 Acres) Residential -One A (R -IA) Single Family Residential ENTER INTO RECORD: (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) ZONING ORDINANCE Location Board of Adjustment Case No. WA -15-15 /Persichitte Site I. REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a 16 -foot (64%) variance from the 25 -foot side yard setback requirement for a side yard adjacent to a public street, resulting in a 9 -foot side setback. The purpose of this variance is to allow for the construction of an attached double carport on the east side of the property. Section 26-115.0 (Variances and Waivers) of the Wheat Ridge City Code empowers the Board of Adjustment to hold public hearings to hear and decide only upon appeals for variances from the strict application of the development standards that are in excess of fifty (50) percent of the standard. II. CASE ANALYSIS The subject property is located on the northwest corner of West 34`h Place and Union Street, in the Applewood Village Subdivision (Exhibit 1, Aerial,), and zoned Residential -One A (R-1 A). The intent of the R -1A zone district is to provide high quality, safe, quiet and stable low-density residential neighborhoods and to prohibit activities of any nature which are incompatible with the low-density residential character. The surrounding area is predominately low-density residential, with Residential - One A (R-1 A) and Residential -One (R-1) zone districts dominating the area (Exhibit 2, Zoning Map). For locational reference: the Applewood Village Shopping Center is located approximately 0.35 miles west of the subject property. According to the Jefferson County Assessor, the subject site has recorded area of 11,224 square feet (0.26 acres), and was constructed in 1962. Currently a one-story brick single-family home and a small accessory structure are located on the property. The existing home has a roughly 30 -foot front setback, a roughly 7 -foot west side setback, a 31 -foot east side setback, and a roughly 43 -foot rear setback. There is an existing two -car attached garage that is currently being utilized as a workshop by the property owner. A variance is being requested to allow the property owner to construct a 22 -foot wide by 21 -foot deep attached carport on the east side of the property, adjacent to the attached garage on the southeast portion of the existing single-family home. The property is a corner lot with frontage on W. 34`h Place and Union Street. In the R -IA zone district, any side yard which abuts a public street is required to have a minimum setback of 25 feet for all structures. The proposed carport would encroach 16 feet into the required setback. The structure would not interfere with the sight triangle. Additionally, due to the size of the public right-of-way, the proposed carport would be approximately 16 -feet from the edge of the sidewalk, and approximately 21 feet from the curb. Exhibit 3, Site Plan). There are very few alternative locations for the carport, without requiring a significant number of alterations to the property. On the west side of the property the structure is too close to the property line to construct a carport. The applicant stated that he has considered constructing a garage in the rear yard. However, the cost was too prohibitive, and the construction of such a garage would require a reconstruction of the rear yard's landscaping (Exhibit S, Letter of Request). The specific site location is the most functionally feasible as it is planned to be constructed at the end of an existing driveway. Ultimately, the variance request would result in a 9 -foot side yard setback, and the proposed carport would meet all other development standards including height and maximum size. The parcel meets minimum standards for the R -IA zone district, and total building coverage with the proposed carport Board of Adjustment Case No. WA -15-15 /Persichitte would be approximately 260/o—less than the maximum 30% allowed in R -IA. The following table compares the required R-1 A development standards with the actual and proposed conditions: _R -1A Development Standards: Required Actual Lot Area 9,000 square feet min 11,224 square feet Lot Width 75 feet (min) 129 feet (Union Street) 87 feet W. 30 Pl. Major Accessory Structures: Required Proposed Garage Building Size 1,000 square feet max 462 square feet Height 15 feet max Front Setback 25 feet min 30 feet Side Setback 25 feet (min) 9 feet Rear Setback 5' if 510' in height; 10' if > 00' in height 72 feet III. VARIANCE CRITERIA The Board of Adjustment shall base its decision in consideration of the extent to which the applicant demonstrates that a majority of the "criteria for review" listed in Section 26-115.C.4 of the City Code have been met. The applicant has provided an analysis of the variance criteria (Exhibit 6, Criteria espor v . Staff provides the following review and analysis. 1. The property in question would not yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located. If the request were denied, the property would continue to yield a reasonable return in use. The property would continue to function as a single-family residence, regardless of the outcome of the variance request. Staff finds this criterion has not been met. 2. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. The R-lA zone district allows for detached accessory buildings, including carports. The proposed carport will be built to match the architecture of the existing house (Exhibit 7, Elevations). Due to the large public right-of-way (which measures approximately 7 feet from the edge of sidewalk), a 16 -foot setback encroachment would likely not cause the carport to be noticeably encroaching into the required setback. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 3. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property with this application, which would not be possible without the variance. Board ofAdjustment Case No. WA -15-151 Persichitte Without the variance, the applicant is v9Fy limited in the location of any additions to the house or accessory structures on his property. a front and side yards, the area of the needed expansion are nearly at the setback requirements. Constructing in the rear yard is not financially feasible and would require /altering the rear yard landscaping (Exhibits, Letter oj' Request). Encroaching on the side setback requirement will not negatively impact the neighborhood; it will, however, add more functionality and ease of mind for the applicant and his vehicles. Staff finds this criterion has been met 4. The particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved results in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out. While there is some topographic variation on the site, the majority is constricted to the extreme eastern and northern portions of the site. Much of the perceived fall (from site visits or topographic maps) occurs outside of the property boundaries (Exhibit 8, Topography). Staff finds this criterion has not been met. 5. The alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. The difficulty lies in the lack of an area to store the owner/applicants personal vehicles. This hardship is being caused by the owner's use of the garage as a shop/storage area. Staff finds this criterion has not been met. 6. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located, by, among other things, substantially or permanently impairing the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or substantially diminishing or impairing property values within the neighborhood. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare and would not be injurious to neighboring property or improvements. It would not hinder or impair the development of the adjacent properties. The adequate supply of air and light would not be compromised as a result of this request. The request would not increase the congestion in the streets, nor would it cause an obstruction to motorists on the adjacent streets. The proposed carport will not impede the sight distance triangle and would not increase the danger of fire. It is unlikely that the request would impair property values in the neighborhood. Staff finds this criterion has been met. Board of Adjustment 4 Case No. WA -15-15 /Persichitte 7. The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are present in the neighborhood and are not unique to the property. There are no unique or unusual circumstances present in the neighborhood that are also present on the property that necessitate the need for a variance. Staff finds that this criterion has not been met. 8. Granting of the variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities. Single family homes and their accessory buildings are not required to meet building codes pertaining to the accommodation of persons with disabilities. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. 9. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual, The Architectural and Site Design Manual does not apply to single and two family dwelling units. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. IV. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Having found the application non-compliant with the majority of the review criteria, staff recommends DENIAL of a 16 -foot (64%) variance from the 25 -foot side yard setback requirement for a side yard adjacent to a public street. Staff has found that there are not unique circumstances attributed to this request that would warrant approval of a variance. Therefore, staff recommends denial for the following reasons: 1. The property will continue to yield a reasonable return in use, service or income without the variance. 2. The physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the property does not result in a particular and unique hardship. 3. The alleged hardship has been created by the owner/applicant. Board o/'Adjustment Case No. TVA -15-15 /Persidaitte EXHIBIT 1: AERIAL Board of Adjustment Case No. WA -1 S-1 S 1 Persichitte EXHIBIT 2: ZONING MAP Board of Adjustment Case No. WA-15-15/Persichitte EXHIBIT 3: SITE PLAN Carport .__..�zt' •--- 16' 16'setback encroachment Board of Adjustment 8 Case No. WA -1 S-1 S / Persichitte EXHIBIT 4: SITE PHOTOS View of 12025 W. 34"' Place from West 34"' Place looking north. Location of proposed carport is indicated by the white arrow. (Source: Google) Board of Adjustment Case No. WA -15-15 /Persichitte EXHIBIT 5: LETTER OF REQUEST Persichitte 12025 W. 341'' Place Wheat Ridge, Co 80033 September 2015 City of Wheat Ridge Community Development, We are trying to apply for a variance to have a car port done on the property listed above. We would prefer to have it a double car port to accommodate both of our vehicles, however if it is only allowed to have one done then we will accept that decision. It was suggested to build a full garage in our back yard. This alone would cause us to completely redo our backyard landscaping and build the garage. I'm estimating this to run around $50,000 to $60,000. 1 am retired and this is just not an affordable option. We are simply trying to cover our two vehicles with an open sided car port that would be costing approximately $5,000 on the high end. We cannot park in our garage and haven't for the 24 years we have lived here do to my workshop, for work purposes. I cannot continue to pay our deductibles and have our vehicles repaired due to the weather here in Colorado. I have had continued hail, sun and wind damage on our vehicles and would appreciate being able to cover them from these eliminates. We have also spoken to our neighbors to make sure it would not be an eye sore and they have no objections to what we want to do. Again, if we were allowed to do the car port single or double would help us out a lot. Please consider this and allow us to build it. Si e , Charles & Lisa Persichitte Board ofAdjustment 10 Case No. WA -15-1 S 1 Persichitte EXHIBIT 6: CRITERIA RESPONSES Charles A. & Lisa A. Persichitte 12025 West 341h Place Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-5202 September 9, 2015 Review Criteria: Variance Questions #1. There is no reasonable use of return or service, it only add property value. #2. No it will not alter the essential character of the locality and or property. #3. Yes, this is a substantial investment and improvement to the property. #4. There is no possible topographical condition and or hardship. #5. All that we are asking is to protect our vehicles after all these years we have lived here. We can finally afford to build this carport that is in question #6. This statement does not really apply. We have all the support and ok's from all our neighbors. They are all good with it. #7. This is not an uncommon request. The neighborhood looks great and our goal is to build a carport that would appeal to the neighborhood and are neighbors. It will fit properly. Board ofAdjustment Case No. WA -15-1 S 1 Persichilte EXISTING ROOF OVER GARAGE EXHIBIT 7: ELEVATIONS NEW ROOF PITCH AND SHINGLES TO MATCH EXISTING ROOF EXISTING - ROOF PITCH NEW SIDING TO MATCH EXISTING SIDING u I----- 22'-� F! NATK#! LOOKIN W ST PROPOSED CARPORT TO EXTEND OUT FRO EXISTIN GARAGE AND U OPEN ON THREE SIDE Board ofAdjustment 12 Case No. WA -1 S-1 S /Persichitte EXHIBIT 8: TOPOGRAPHY Board of Adjustment 13 Case No. WA -1 S-1 S /Persichitte L O N r 11940 ti 03460.x, f LO V7 N N O c0 N d C z _ 03420 4 r t S 1 34TH 03392 03395 Infini = of ion www isigis ne (Feb 2015 ► A , City of Project: State Plane Colorado Central HARN, NAD 83 (feet) • N ��WheatMidge This data is intended for information purposes only. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES The City of Wheat Ridge proivides this information on Geographic Information an "as is" basis and makes no representation or warranty City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado that the data will be error free. WR is not responsible to 7500 West 29th Avenue 0 10 20 40 any user for costs or damaes arising from inconsistencies Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 Feet in its data. 303.234.5900 Date: 9/11/201: PID: FY0015.0024 R I ' f F j I I ra z I 0 N N Cl Q Q L7 L7 Z F- ry W �> X O W V) w c� _z Y O O z O Q a r. O=O Z W a- cl) m g O W �OW� U m U! W � � Z � COQ= O W~ mo() O Z Q Df W Q� mF-Q Q L7 z I 0 N N 0 O Q Q' Q' Q L7 L7 Z F -- W00 W X O W O -O Z W I C") O O W m OfOw� U m U) W L Z LLJ Cf) OQ= O Li F Cl- 0 O Of W � H Q Kaman Industrial Technologies KAMAN 4595 Stapleton Drive North Denver, CO 80216 (303) 320-5240 Phone (303) 320-5252 Fax Kaman Industrial Technologies KAMAN r L' 4595 Stapleton Drive North, Denver, CO 80216 • Tel: (303) 320-5240 • Fax: (303) 320-5252 Christian Mendrop to Charles A Persichittc Building Estimate Charles, Fri, Aug 28 6:16 PM The 20x20x8.5 Sierra carport was $2,850 engineered to your building codes delivery from AZ $450. If engineered stamped drawing are required add $1,000 for drawings. We charge $3.50sgft for install. I will price your exact dimensions Monday and email a detailed quote. Thanks, Christian Mendrop Precision Buildings, LLC Mobil: (970) 274-0406 Office: (970) 549-8477 Fax: (970) 236-9672 Email: cmendrop@precisionbuildings.net Web: www.precisionbuildings.net 7 /l�• /fie Facebook:www.facebook.com/greenbuildings Charles A. & Lisa A. Persichitte 12025 West 34th Place Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-5202 September 9, 2015 Review Criteria: Variance Questions #1. There is no reasonable use of return or service, it only add property value. #2. No it will not alter the essential character of the locality and or property. #3. Yes, this is a substantial investment and improvement to the property. #4. There is no possible topographical condition and or hardship. #5. All that we are asking is to protect our vehicles after all these years we have lived here. We can finally afford to build this carport that is in question #6. This statement does not really apply. We have all the support and ok's from all our neighbors. They are all good with it. #7. This is not an uncommon request. The neighborhood looks great and our goal is to build a carport that would appeal to the neighborhood and are neighbors. It will fit properly. City Of Rev 5/2014 -/ Wheat�idge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Review Criteria: Variance A variance provides relief from the strict application of zoning standards in instances where a unique physical hardship is present. Per Section 26-115 of the Wheat Ridge Municipal Code, the reviewing authority (Community Development Director, Board of Adjustment, Planning Commission, or City Council) shall base its decision in consideration of the extent to which an applicant demonstrates that a majority of the following criteria have been met: The property in question would not yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for t1W district in which it is located. 2. Te vanancerv,�gluld�aterltthe essential character of the locality.y —�-K 3. The apcant is proposing a subs ani - investment in the property with this application, which would not be possib e wit ut the variance. Y4-0 S 4.e particular h sical surroundin 40 P Y g, shape or topographica condition of the s eP �' property results in a particular and unique hardshipP � p 0 CJ (upon the owner) as distin uishec� �1 from a m re innconvenience.� le � j 3 ) U /1o� I & tj Gd ,�� 7)'), � o��ja r S� P� X/ 5. If there is a particular or unique hardsFi-PSA PIleged difficulty or hardsfip has not be n cr ated y an person presently having an interest in the property. 1,J e a v� �Jc — TO re ute. � 0--40., \ 'Al 1, L� % Le � 6. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located, by, among other things, substantially or permanently impairing the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or substantially diminishing o im�iring prop=yalues within he neighborhood. JL1 co 7. The unusual circumstances or c ditions ne essitatitfg th ria a i'eq�ugest �`� oV in the neighborh od nd are not un' ue to e propertyAm oS � � �� ° p t U iJ v J ` � Grantin oche variakn "' `'�' 0 g ouidresu1t i QQ�� Dn a reasonable a�aToo� a erson wig disabilities. [Does not typically apply to single- or two-family homes.] P The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual. [Does not typically apply to single- or two-family homes.] Community Development Department - (303) 235-2846 www.ci.wheatridge.co.us Persichitte 12025 W. 34th Place Wheat Ridge, Co 80033 September 2015 City of Wheat Ridge Community Development, We are trying to apply for a variance to have a car port done on the property listed above. We would prefer to have it a double car port to accommodate both of our vehicles, however if it is only allowed to have one done then we will accept that decision. It was suggested to build a full garage in our back yard. This alone would cause us to completely redo our backyard landscaping and build the garage. I'm estimating this to run around $50,000 to $60,000. 1 am retired and this is just not an affordable option. We are simply trying to cover our two vehicles with an open sided car port that would be costing approximately $5,000 on the high end. We cannot park in our garage and haven't for the 24 years we have lived here do to my workshop, for work purposes. I cannot continue to pay our deductibles and have our vehicles repaired due to the weather here in Colorado. I have had continued hail, sun and wind damage on our vehicles and would appreciate being able to cover them from these eliminates. We have also spoken to our neighbors to make sure it would not be an eye sore and they have no objections to what we want to do. Again, if we were allowed to do the car port single or double would help us out a lot. Please consider this and allow us to build it. Si rel , Charles & Lisa Persichitte When recorded, return to. Universal Lending Corporation Atti). final Document Department 6775 East Evans Avenue Denver, CO 80224 Title Order No.: 18293 I OAN #: UL000255126 ISpnce Abb.o --;1 Jre rix k-' idir , Dao+) State of Colorado DEED OF TRUST I F"ac;ase n . 052-7924080-703-203B MIN: 10 01984-0002060902 4 MERS PHONE #: 1-888-679-6377 HIS LLD OF I R;jS I I'Security Instmmert`) is rrade on April 9, 2015, arnonr; rhe aran (or CHARLES A PERSICHITTE AND LISA A PERSICHITTE ! City of W heat lk COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Submittal Checklist: Variance Project Name: (_..Lt.,-* f'o'Y t- lJoublr ay Project Location: _U0 -75 Application Contents: A variance provides relief from the strict application of zoning standards in instances where a unique physical hardship is present. The following items represent a complete variance application: 1. Completed, notarized land use application form AL2. Application fee -'v 3. Signed submittal checklist (this document) 4. Proof of ownership—e.g. deed -,"' �1 5. Written authorization from property owner(s) if an agent acts on behalf of the owner(s) >L6. Written request and description of the proposal Include a response to the variance review criteria—these are found in Section 26-115 of the municipal code Include an explanation as to why alternate designs that may comply with the zoning standards are not feasible Include an explanation of the unique physical hardship that necessitates relief 47. Survey or Improvement Location Certificate (ILC) of the property 8. To -scale site plan indicating existing and proposed building footprints and setbacks _9. Proposed building elevations indicating proposed heights, materials, and color scheme Rev 5/2014 As applicant for this project, I hereby ensure that all of the above requirements have been included with this submittal. I fully understand that if any one of the items listed on this checklist has been excluded. the documents will NOT be distributed for City review. In addition, I understand that in the event any revisions need to maple after the second d 11 review, I will be subject to the applicable resubmittal fee. /) Signature: Name (please print). Date: Phone: `fes Community Development Department (303) 235-2846 www.ci.wheatridge.co.us Description of work: (Check all that apply) ❑ NEW COMMERCIAL STRUCTURE ❑ ELECTRICAL SERVICE UPGRADE ❑ NEW RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE ❑ COMMERCIAL ROOFING ❑ COMMERCIAL ADDITION ❑ RESIDENTIAL ROOFING ❑ RESDENTIAL ADDITION ❑ WINDOW REPLACEMENT ❑ COMMERCIAL ACCESSORY STRUCTURE (Garage, shed, deck, etc.) RESIDENTIAL ACCESSORY STRUCTURE (Garage, shed, deck, etc.) ❑ MECHANICAL SYSTEM/APPLIANCE REPAIR or REPLACEMENT ❑ PLUMBING SYSTEM/APPLIANCE REPAIR or REPLACMENT ❑ ELECTRICAL SYSTEM/APPLIANCE REPAIR or REPLACEMENT ❑ OTHER (Describe) (For ALL projects, please provide a detailed description of work to be performed, including current use of areas, proposed uses, square footage, existing condition and proposed new condition, appliance size and efficiency, type and amount of materials to be used, etc.) Sq. FtJLF Btu's Amps Squares Gallons Other Project Value: (Contract value or the cost of all materials and labor included in the entire project) OWNER/CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE OF UNDERSTANDING AND AGREEMENT I hereby certify that the setback distances proposed by this permit application are accurate and do not violate applicable ordinances, rules or regulations of the City of Wheat Ridge or covenants, easements or restrictions of record; that all measurements shown and allegations made are accurate; that I have read and agree to abide by all conditions printed on this application and that I assume full responsibility for compliance with applicable City of Wheat Ridge codes and ordinances for work under any permit issued based on this application; that 1 am the legal owner or have been authorized by the legal owner of the property to perform the described work and am also authorized by the legal owner of any entity included on this a • ion to list that entity on this application. CIRCLE ONE: O ®R)(CONTRACTOR) or (AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE) of (OWNER) (CONTRACTOR) PRINT NAME: G6ft r 14 d . TJ" SIGNATU ZONING COMMMENTS Reviewer: BUILDING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Reviewer: PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS Reviewer PROOF OF SUBMISSION FORMS Fire Department ❑ Received ❑ Not Required Water District ❑ Received ❑ Not Required Sanitation District ❑ Received ❑ Not Required DEPARTMENT USE ONLY TF,: D 9 'O S OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION Building Division Valuation: $ ♦6 A4 City of ��9 W heat f:Zjdge LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION Community Development Department 7500 West 29th Avenue • Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 • Phone (303) 235-2846 0 (Please print or type all information) Applican14`{Z`R5�'l . Address�� l� P!„ , Phon City W State �'_� Zip gOC� �• Fax Owner J> t -n �, City Address IQ r -n C Phone State Zip Fax Contact -S'lJ m E Address GG toy' Phone City State Zip Fax (The person listed as contact will be contacted to answer questions regarding this application, provide additional information when necessary, post public hearing signs, will receive a copy of the staff report prior to Public Hearing, and shall be responsible for forwarding all verbal and written communication to applicant and owner.) Location of request (address): Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request): Please refer to submittal checklists for complete application requirements; incomplete applications will not be accepted O Change of zone or zone conditions C3 Special Use Permit O Subdivision: Minor (5 lots or less) O Consolidation Plat O Conditional Use Permit O Subdivision: Major (More than 5 lots) C3 Flood Plain Special Exception O Site Plan approval C3 Temporary Use, Building, Sign O Lot Line Adjustment O Concept Plan approval 19[Variance/Waiver (from Section ) O Planned Building Group O Right of Way Vacation O Other: Detailed description of request: Required information: Assessors Parcel Number: Size of Lot (acres or square footage): Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning: Current Use: Proposed Use: / certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best ofmy knowledge and that in filing this application, / am acting with the knowledge and consent of those rsons listed above, w' ose consent the requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners must submit p e - attorney m t ieh approved o this action on his behalf. Notarized Signature of Applica State of Col rado County of d % S C Gl . } ss The foregoing instrument (Land Use Processing_Application) was acknowledged M11u®6A MACKEY NOTARY PUBLIC by et ais (' day of , 1 ' - , 201E by /�� L� i SS« STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID 20134042377 Notary -Public MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY 9, 2017 My commission expires /201 To be filled out by staff: Date received Fee S Receipt No. Comp Plan Design. Zoning Related Case No. Pre -App Mtg. Date Case No. Quarter Section Map Case Manager 1-1