Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
WA-16-09
City of Wheat 1"ge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29`n Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 August 10, 2016 Jerimiah Lord Designs by Sundown 6875 S. Santa Fe Dr. Littleton, CO 80120 Dear Mr. Lord: RE: Case No. WA -16-09 At its meeting of July 28, 2016, the Board of Adjustment APPROVED your request for two variances. The first is a request for a variance to the maximum size permitted for an accessory structure in the Residential -One (R-1) zone district. The second is a request for a variance to permit a metal accessory structure for the property located at 3390 Oak Street. FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. The proposed pool cover will appear incidental to the home, and significant property investment will occur as a result of approval of the variance. 2. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. 3. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare. 4. No objections were received regarding the variance request. 5. The building is only 13 -feet tall. 6. There is no variance request for setbacks or maximum lot coverage. 7. The building is primarily transparent with less than 10% metal. WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The design and architecture of the proposed enclosure shall be consistent with representations depicted in the application materials, subject to staff review and approval through review of a building permit. 2. If any existing perimeter tree is removed or becomes damaged during construction, it shall be replaced with a minimum 2" caliper tree or 6 -foot tall evergreen tree. Enclosed is a copy of the Certificate of Resolution, as well as a draft copy of the minutes, stating the Board's decision. All variance approvals automatically expire within 180 days of the date approval unless a building permit for the variance is obtained within such period of time. The expiration date for this variance approval is January 28, 2017. Please feel free to contact me at (303) 235-2846 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Tammy Odea Administrative Assistant Enclosures: Draft of Minutes Certificate of Resolution (to follow by separate mailing) cc: WA -16-09 (case file) WA 1609.doc WW"v-ci.w hcatridge.co.us 4. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located. 5. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual. Motion passed by a vote of 7-0 B. Case No. WA -16-09: An application filed by Designs by Sundown for approval of two variances. The first is a request for a variance to the maximum size permitted for an accessory structure in the Residential -One (R-1) zone district. The second is a request for a variance to permit a metal accessory structure for the property located at 3390 Oak Street. The case was presented by Lisa Ritchie. She entered the contents of the case file and packet materials, the zoning ordinance and the digital presentation into the record. She stated all appropriate notification and posting requirements have been met and advised the board there was jurisdiction to hear the case. She reviewed the digital presentation. Ms. Ritchie explained the area of the property is 25,600, sq. ft., just a little over half an acre with an existing single family home on the property. The intent of this request is to build a retractable pool enclosure. It would be 500 sq. ft. larger than the 1000 sq. ft. permitted in the R-1 zone district. The pool enclosure will be an anodized aluminum frame with a polycarbonate sheeting, kind of like a green house. The back portion will be fixed and then part of it can retract or keep the pool covered during the colder months. The structure will only be 13 -feet in height which is 2 -feet under the allowable height. There were no neighborhood objections. One of the conditions would be to have the owner replace any trees on the property if they should die from becoming damaged or diseased. Board Member PAGE stated she found a typo in the staff report and the model for approval. Number three under For the Following Reasons should not be included in the approval. Board Member GRIFFETH asked who came up with the condition of replacement of trees and if that will transfer to later owners of the property. Ms. Ritchie stated that staff came up with this condition as long as the structure is in place and the property owner agreed with it. Also, it will transfer to the next owners. Chair ABBOTT asked about how staff came up with the tree replacement condition because he has never heard of this being done before. Ms. Ritchie explained she discussed it with the director and the structure won't be visible to the neighbors because of the vegetation and because they are getting a benefit above and beyond what the zoning code will allow so staff determined it was reasonable to make the request. Board of Adjustment Minutes July 28, 2016 6 Board Member HOVLAND wondered if the tree replacement is in perpetuity or during construction and feels it is far reaching if it is in perpetuity. Ms. Ritchie state it is in perpetuity, but the Board can state how they would like it in the motion. Board Member BELL feels it is important to maintain vegetation. Roy Martin, Owner 3390 Oak Street, Wheat Ridge Jeremiah Lord 8562 Ingalls Circle, Arvada Mr. Martin explained he wanted to create an oasis in the backyard that is private and the trees were mature when we placed them in the yard and this was by design. He stated he has no problem replacing the trees and has done so in the past when he lost four trees to a devastating storm in 2009. A few trees will be removed right up against the house to install the pool, but this will not affect the neighbors view. Chair ABBOTT asked why does the owner need such a large structure and why metal. Mr. Martin explained he would like some walking room around the pool when the structure is closed during the winter months and aluminum is the only material that satisfies the requirement to look good over a long period of time. Mr. Lord added that when the structure is closed the owners want the pool to be functional and safe to walk around. It will be also be non -impactful to the neighborhood and will increase the property value. Board Member PAGE asked if the structure was attached to the house if the variance would be needed. Ms. Ritchie said no, not if it is attached to the house. Bruce Waring, neighbor 3370 Oak Street, Wheat Ridge Mr. Waring says he is in favor of the variance. We live in a great neighborhood and nobody disapproves, the view will not be obstructed and there will be no other impacts. The tree requirement is a nice idea as part of the construction, but in perpetuity if far reaching and shouldn't be required. Board Member PAGE asked what the requirement is about fencing pools. Mr. Lord explained that because there is already a 6 -foot fence around the backyard then the requirements have been met. Board of Adjustment Minutes July 28, 2016 7 Upon a motion by Board Member GRIFFETH and second by Board Member HOVLAND, the following motion was stated: WHEREAS, application Case No. WA -16-09 was not eligible for administrative review; and WHEREAS, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law and in recognition that there were no protests registered against it; and WHEREAS the relief applied for may not be granted without detriment to the public welfare and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing and City of Wheat Ridge NOW, THERFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Board of Adjustment application Case No. WA -16- 09 be, and hereby is APPROVED. TYPE OF VARIANCE: a variance to the maximum permitted size for an accessory structure, and a request for approval of a variance to permit a metal accessory structure. FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. The proposed pool cover will appear incidental to the home, and significant property investment will occur as a result of approval of the variance. 2. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. 3. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare. 4. No objections were received regarding the variance request. 5. The building is only 13 -feet tall. 6. There is no variance request for setbacks or maximum lot coverage. 7. The building is primarily transparent with less than 10% metal. WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The design and architecture of the proposed enclosure shall be consistent with representations depicted in the application materials, subject to staff review and approval through review of a building permit. 2. If any existing perimeter tree is removed or becomes damaged during construction, it shall be replaced with a minimum 2" caliper tree or 6 -foot tall evergreen tree. Motion passed by a vote of 7-0. 6. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING Chair ABBOTT closed the public hearing. 7. OLD BUSINESS Board of Adjustment Minutes July 28, 2016 8 8. NEW BUSINESS A. Approval of Minutes — January 28, 2016 It was moved by Board Member PAGE and seconded by Board Member HOVLAND to approve the minutes as written. The motion passed 7-0. C. Board Member PAGE encouraged the Board to attend the Mayor's Reception for the Carnation Festival on Wednesday, August 10. D. Board Member BELL thought there were some good discussions at the meeting tonight. She would like to suggest having a session with the City Attorney and discussions with the Board in general about the changes going on in the City. Chair ABBOTT added it would be nice to include the Planning Commission. Ms. Ritchie added that the Planning Commission has update discussions at least once a year and the same could be done for the Board of Adjustment. E. 8. ADJOURNMENT Chair ABBOTT adjourned the meeting at 9:32 p.m. David Kuntz, Chair Tammy Odean, Recording Secretary Board of Adjustment Minutes July 28, 2016 9 PUBLIC HEARING ROSTER CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT July 28, 2016 Case No. WA -16-09: an application filed by Designs by Sundown for approval of two variances. The first is a request for a variance to the maximum size permitted for an accessory structure in the Residential -One (R-1) zone district. The second is a request for a variance to permit a metal accessory structure for the property located at 3390 Oak Street. (Please print) Name Address In Favor/Opposed LA IQ 09/30/2016 09/30/2016 Variance Requests A variance request to permit the property to have an accessory structure greater than the maximum allowed size of 1,000 square feet. A variance request to permit a metal accessory structure greater than 120 square feet. The first request could be approved administratively, but the second can not, therefore both requests will be considered by the Board of Adjustment Proposed Changes 3390 Oak Street 4i V 3390 Oak Street 7075 W. 32nd Avenue 3390 Oak Street 3390 Oak Street � T•� J�J M V'7 i 3390 Oak Street - Renderings Im- Ir iii 0i" 3390 Oak Street - Renderings Staff Recommendation Staff recommends APPROVAL of the requests for the following reasons: • The proposed pool cover will appear incidental to the home, and significant property investment will occur as a result of approval of the variance; • The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality; • The request would not be detrimental to public welfare. Staff recommends the following CONDITIONS: • The design and architecture shall be consistent with representations; • All existing trees should be replaced; 101 CASE MANAGER: CASE NO. & NAME: City of Wh6atRLdge CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT Board of Adjustment Lisa Ritchie WA -16-09 / Martin MEETING DATE: July 28, 2016 ACTIONS REQUESTED: Two variances are requested for property zoned Residential -One (R-1) located at 3390 Oak Street. The first is for approval of a 500 square foot variance from the permitted size of 1,000 square feet for an accessory building permitted, and the second is to permit a metal accessory structure. LOCATION OF REQUEST: 3390 Oak Street APPLICANT (S): Jeremiah Lord, Designs by Sundown OWNER (S): W Kathryn Martin Living Trust APPROXIMATE AREA: 25,156 square feet (0.58 acres) PRESENT ZONING: Residential -One (R-1) PRESENT LAND USE: Single Family Residential ENTER INTO RECORD: (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) ZONING ORDINANCE Board of Adjustment Case No. WA -16-09 /Martin JURISDICTION• All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction for the Board of Adjustment to hear this case. I. REQUEST There are two requests being made by the applicant. First, the applicant is requesting approval of a variance to allow an accessory building 500 square feet larger than the permitted size of 1,000 sq ft, resulting in an accessory building that would be 1,500 sq ft. Per the Residential -One (R-1) zone district standards, a major accessory building can be no larger than 1,000 sq ft. The second request is for a variance to approve a metal accessory structure larger than 120 square feet in a residential zone district which is prohibited in Section 26-625. Accessory buildings and structures. The goal of the two requests is to allow the construction of a retractable outdoor pool enclosure that is built with an aluminum frame and polycarbonate sheeting. Section 26-115.C. Variances and waivers empowers the Board of Adjustment to hear and decide on variances from the strict application of the zone district development standards. The first request is within the threshold of an administrative approval, but the second request requires Board of Adjustment consideration. The Community Development Director determined that both requests should be considered by the Board of Adjustment during a public hearing as part of the same case. II. CASE ANALYSIS The applicant, who is representing the owners, is requesting the two variances at 3390 Oak Street in order to construct a 1,500 square foot metal framed retractable pool enclosure in the rear yard at the single family residence. Wxhibit 1, Aerial). The property is zoned Residential -One (R-1), a zone district that provides high quality, safe, quiet and stable low-density residential neighborhoods, and to prohibit activities of any nature which are incompatible with the low-density residential character. The property is located on the southeast corner of Oak Street and 34th Place. The total lot area is 25,156 square feet (0.58 acres), per the Jefferson County Assessor. The property is in an area predominately zoned R-1. The neighborhood character is low density residential to the south, east and west. There is some R-2 and R-3 zoning to the north of 35th Avenue. (Exhibit 2, Zoning Map). The subject lot currently contains a single family home that was constructed in 2001, per the Jefferson County Assessor. The lot is platted as Lot 13A of the Distinctive Addresses at Applewood Amendment #1 Subdivision. The lot was originally two lots in the subdivision, which were consolidated under case number LLA -00-03 in 2000 by the current owner. The single story home has a footprint of approximately 3,937 square feet. The total lot coverage proposed with the existing home and the 1,500 sq ft pool enclosure will be roughly 5,237 sq ft, or 21.6%. The maximum lot coverage permitted in the R-1 zone is 25%. The lot is square in shape with a notch in the southeast corner, with roughly 147 feet of frontage along Oak Street and 160 feet of frontage along W. 34th Place. The existing home is located facing Oak Street, with a 35'-0" front setback, a 40'-0" setback along W. 34th Place, a 58'-6" rear setback and an Board of Adjustment 2 Case No. WA-16-09/Martin 38'-0" setback to the southern side property line. The lot gently slopes from the southern property line to the north, with roughly 8 feet of fall. (Exhibit 3, ILC, Exhibit 4, Site Photos). The property owners are the original owners and intend to make this improvement in order to facilitate a healthy lifestyle, which includes swimming, year-round on their property. In addition to the pool enclosure, the applicants intend to do a large landscaping renovation. Vxhibit S, Renderings and conceptual site plan). The variances would result in a single family home with an oversized accessory structure that is constructed of metal. All other development standards for the R-1 zone district will be met. The applicants have not provided a final site plan for the proposed improvements with specific setbacks, but there is adequate room on the property to accommodate this structure within the development standards. The structure is proposed to be a total of roughly 13 feet tall, which is lower than the maximum permitted height for a major accessory structure of 15 feet. No other variances are being sought for the project. The 15 -day notification period for the public hearing is currently in progress. As of July 22, 2016 no objections have been received. III. VARIANCE CRITERIA In order to approve a variance, the Board of Adjustment must determine that the majority of the "criteria for review" listed in Section 26-115.C.4 of the City Code have been met. The applicant has provided their analysis of the application's compliance with the variance criteria (Exhibit 6, Letter of Request and Analysis of Criteria). Staff provides the following review and analysis of the variance criteria. First Request: Variance to the maximum size of'an accessory structure. 1. The property in question would not yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located. If the request were denied, the property would continue to yield a reasonable return in use. The property would continue to function as a single-family residence, regardless of the outcome of the variance request. Staff finds this criterion has not been met. 2. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. The variance is not likely to alter the character of the locality. The requested size variance will result in a property that is still within the maximum building coverage percentage. The requested size variance will result in the property staying in the same character as the surrounding area. The surrounding area predominately has large lots with building coverages close to the maximum building coverage percentage, with a few that exceed it. The nearest ten properties in the subdivision have an average building coverage percentage of 22.3%, per Jefferson County Assessor. The proposed new accessory building will not result in a lot that is out of scale with the neighborhood. Board of Adjustment Case No. WA-16-09/Martin Staff finds this criterion has been met. 3. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property with this application, which would not be possible without the variance. The applicants are proposing a substantial investment in the property through the construction of an in -ground pool and landscaping enhancements. The project is expected to add value to the property. While the applicant could construct a pool without a cover, the size variance will allow adequate deck space surrounding the pool to meet code requirements. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 4. The particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved results in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out. There is no particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property that presents a unique hardship upon the applicant. Rather, the applicants desire the pool to be enclosed in order to have it available for year-round use. Staff finds this criterion has not been met. 5. The alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. The hardship has been created by the applicant's desire to enclose a pool with a cover that exceeds the maximum accessory structure size in the R-1 zone district. Staff finds this criterion has not been met. 6. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located, by, among other things, substantially or permanently impairing the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or substantially diminishing or impairing property values within the neighborhood. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare and would not be injurious to neighboring property or improvements. It would not hinder or impair the development of the adjacent properties. The adequate supply of air and light would not be compromised as a result of this request. The request would not increase the congestion in the streets. Nor would it cause an obstruction to motorists on the adjacent streets or impede the sight distance triangle. The request will not diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Conversely, the proposed improvements will likely have a positive impact on the neighborhood by promoting investment in property. Board of Adjustment Case No. WA-16-09/Martin Staff finds this criterion has been met. 7. The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are present in the neighborhood and are not unique to the property. The R -I zoning and development standards are not unique to the property, rather it is the predominate zoning in the area. Staff finds that this criterion has been met. 8. Granting of the variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities. Single family homes and their accessory buildings are not required to meet building codes pertaining to the accommodation of persons with disabilities. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. 9. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual The Architectural and Site Design Manual does not apply to single and two family dwelling units. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. Second Request: Variance to allow a metal accessory structure greater than 120 square feet. 1. The property in question would not yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located. If the request were denied, the property would continue to yield a reasonable return in use. The property would continue to function as a single-family residence, regardless of the outcome of the variance request. Staff finds this criterion has not been met. 2. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. The variance is not likely to alter the character of the locality. The requested building material variance will not result in an accessory structure of lesser quality than intended in the R-1 zone district. The intent of the regulation restricting metal accessory structures is to prohibit metal sheds, pole barns, and garages on residential property. Staff believes that the intent of the regulation did not contemplate this type of project. Staff finds this criterion has been met. Board gfAdjustment Case No. WA-16-09/Martin 3. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property with this application, which would not be possible without the variance. The applicants are proposing a substantial investment in the property through the construction of an in -ground pool and landscaping enhancements. The project is expected to add value to the property. While the applicant could construct a pool without a cover, in this case, the building material variance will allow the construction of a high quality project. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 4. The particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved results in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out. There is no particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property that presents a unique hardship upon the applicant. Rather, the applicants desire the pool to be enclosed in order to have it available for year-round use. Staff finds this criterion has not been met. 5. The alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. The hardship has been created by the applicant's desire to enclose a pool with a cover that is constructed of materials not permitted for an accessory structure in the R-1 zone district. Staff finds this criterion has not been met. 6. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located, by, among other things, substantially or permanently impairing the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or substantially diminishing or impairing property values within the neighborhood. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare and would not be injurious to neighboring property or improvements. It would not hinder or impair the development of the adjacent properties. The adequate supply of air and light would not be compromised as a result of this request. The request would not increase the congestion in the streets. Nor would it cause an obstruction to motorists on the adjacent streets or impede the sight distance triangle. The request will not diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Conversely, the proposed improvements will likely have a positive impact on the neighborhood by promoting investment in property. Staff finds this criterion has been met. Board of Adjustment 6 Case No. WA-16-09/Martin 7. The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are present in the neighborhood and are not unique to the property. The R-1 zoning and development standards are not unique to the property, rather it is the predominate zoning in the area. Staff finds that this criterion has been met. 8. Granting of the variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities. Single family homes and their accessory buildings are not required to meet building codes pertaining to the accommodation of persons with disabilities. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. 9. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual. The Architectural and Site Design Manual does not apply to single and two family dwelling units. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. IV. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Having found the application in compliance with the majority of the review criteria, staff recommends APPROVAL of two variances to permit an accessory structure greater than the maximum allowed size and constructed of metal. Staff recommends approval for the following reasons: 1. The proposed pool cover will appear incidental to the home, and significant property investment will occur as a result of approval of the variance. 2. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. 3. The alleged hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. 4. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare. 5. No objections were received regarding the variance request. With the following conditions: 1. The design and architecture of the proposed enclosure shall be consistent with representations depicted in the application materials, subject to staff review and approval through review of a building permit. 2. If any existing tree is removed or becomes damaged, diseased or dead, it shall be replaced with a minimum 2" caliper tree or 6 -foot tall evergreen tree. Attachments: A. Resolution Template Board of Adjustment Case No. WA-16-09/Martin EXHIBIT 1: AERIAL Board ofAq ustment Case No. WA-16-09/Martin EXHIBIT 2: ZONING MAP Board of Adjustment Case No. WA-16-09/Martin N W E S W N Y O 42.0' EXHIBIT 3: ILC WEST 34TH PLACE 10' E. .......... �.—.__....—..— ........................ ............................(............._15.0 I 92 43.0' 92 30 93 DME i >�3 I P 93 i 94 � { 3 -CAR a4RACEI 95 S - SKU -STORY B t F p I 7F-07.0 96 96 47 2' 69o I 10' UE. 38.0 35.00' =-?lBUILLD 45.0' 19 0• LOT 6 KEN MAR SLOO. 30.0' --__45.@`'0 — — � MAL DESCRUMON: LOT 13 do 14 ---- 1k — }2— .�1—J 5$ LOT 3390 OAK STREET PREPARED FOR: KEN MAR 14MM PRO1ECf N sum. LOT 14 . o SCALE: I"=30' LOT AREA - 25,156 S.F. HOUSE do PATIO AREA — 3,937 S.F. TOTAL LIVING AREA - 3,767 S.F. LOT COVERAGE — 15.75 DRIVEWAY/SIDEWALK LOT COVERAGE — 6.35 WARNING 1. LOCATE UNDERGROUND UTIUTIES PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. 2. THIS PLOT PLAN SHOWS IMPROVEMENTS AT GRADE AND GRADING ONLY. SEE FOUNDATION PLAN FOR STRUCTURAL INFORMATION. ASCENT ENGINEERING CNA ErQkweriv Consultants 7910 Rolston Rood, Sulte #4 Arvada, Colorado 80004 – (303) 456-6518 FAX (.3(13) 483-9965 d9'19'Q'� <tn'-- ..'' NOTES: N -=•. :C . . '✓!LG 1. ALL swALE GRAdIt�G.'137 MMNMU►1. 2. TOP OF FOUNDATION (TF) — SWALE HIGH POINT + 1.0' 3. DROP GARAGE FLOOR SLAB 1.4' TO FLATTEN DRIVE SLOPE. 4. DROP GARAGE DOOR HEADER. PLOT PLAN MAL DESCRUMON: LOT 13 do 14 DISTINCTIVE ADDRESSES AT APPLEWOOD WHEAT R1DGE, COLORADO ADDRPS4: 3390 OAK STREET PREPARED FOR: JDAT& DVG. NO. PRO1ECf N DAVID SCHNIEDER 09-19-00 MARTIN—PP NA Board of Adjustment 10 Case No. WA -1 6-09/ Martin EXHIBIT 4: SITE PHOTOS Shown above is a photo of the side of the property, taken from 34`h Place, looking southeast toward the rear yard. Board ofAdjustment Case No. WA-16-09/Martin Shown above is a photo taken from 30' Place looking south into the rear yard. In the image are several large existing trees on the property. Board of Adjustment 12 Case No. WA -16-09/ Martin �i .j :l• r - Q per. j 1 r �• _'- fir' � . . �. ��.,s - = ct ' i.- M 1l •III",IT r �i .j :l• r - Q per. EXHIBIT 5: PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN & RENDERINGS Board orAdjustment 14 Case No. WA-16-09/Martin EXHIBIT 6: LETTER OF REQUEST and RESPONSE TO CRITERIA RE: Variance Request for 3390 Oak St. To whom it may concern at City of Wheat Ridge: Hello my name is Jeremiah lord a Landscape Designer with Designs By Sundown. We are seeking a variance on behalf of our customers Mr. and Mrs. Martin at 3390 Oak St. Wheat Ridge CO 80033. We are proposing to do a large landscaping renovation with the Martin's which includes a built in swimming pool and hot tub, pool decking and patio space along with several other elements which would not require a Variance. The Martins being a mature retired couple use a pool regularly as part of their health regiment to remain active and mobile. They want to have a pool that they can both enjoy with grandchildren and stay healthy using it year round. This project would also substantially increase their property value which they ultimately intend to pass onto their children as they never intend to move again. The anticipated cost of this entire project could actually exceed half of their current property value. They have asked us to design and build a retractable pool enclosure structure in conjunction with the rest of their project so that in the summer they can enjoy the pool outside, and in the winter close it up and continue to be able to use it year-round. We run into two apparent issues to be in compliance with existing zoning standards with regard to the retractable enclosure. 1. Total allowable sq. ft being 1000 we are asking for approximately 1300sf. We want to have the area big enough to accommodate a pool and hot tub big enough to justify the investment and practical use of the amenity. 2. Building material: The only practical material that accomplishes both structural integrity, weather resistance, durability, lightweight, and the ability to be re -tractable is Aluminum (which would be anodized to a bronze or gray color to blend in with house) The Glazing is a 5/8" thick poly carbonate sheeting. I believe the spirit of the existing code which does not allow any "metal" building structures was largely intended to discourage un- attractive steel buildings having an out of place commercial and or flimsy tin shed look to spoil the pleasing residential environment. From an investment standpoint the ability to have year-round use of the pool creates a lot more intrinsic value to the home owner for the cost of the project effectively doubling its use. It also has value for the environment and energy savings as there is no need to cool the building in the summer, and on sunny days no need for heat in the winter and less energy to heat the pool and or hot tub as well even on non -sunny winter days. This is a unique case and situation, as you can see by the renderings and photo's provided it is a very attractive, functional safe and sturdy structure that meets snow load and building code requirements, we feel it would in no way be intrusive or out of context in this neighborhood. The existing yard is also completely surrounded by large mature tree's none of which would be affected or removed. The neighbor directly behind the Martins would be the only ones impacted by the view corridor and currently all they see are tree's and the Martins roof, not mountains or open view, they also have a pool too and may be interested in doing something similar as the Martin's. Thank you for your time and consideration we sincerely hope we can work with you to make this project work for everyone involved. Sincerely, Jeremiah Lord Designs by Sundown 303-435-2965 jlord@designsbysundown.com Board ofAdjustment 15 Case No. WA-16-09/Martin Variance Review Criteria Responses For: Martin Project 3390 Oak st. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 1: The pools use would be limited to use only % of the year because of the climate here. Also there is a higher return on the investment because of the fact it could be used with much higher frequency. 2: We absolutely do not believe this pool enclosure structure, would in any way alter the character of the locality, feel out of place or out of character in this neighborhood. 3: The Martin's are planning to invest a substantial amount of money to such an extent that it could likely raise surrounding properties value. The total cost of the entire project including landscaping elements is nearly half the current value of the home. The pool enclosure piece which represents 1/3`d of the total cost of the project would not be possible without a variance given the current zoning standards. 4: There are no issues here as it relates to this project. S: No unique hardship has been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. 6: We believe there are no foreseeable detrimental issues like the ones stated here that would result from the granting of this variance. 7: There are other built in pools in this neighborhood that is not unique, while the request for variance is unique regarding a pool enclosure it seems more because no one has asked or attempted to do one like this but it is a logical addition to a pool area. 8: Granting this variance would result in a reasonable accommodation for Mr. & Mrs. Martin in terms of their ability to easily access and use the pool regularly year-round as a preventative therapy for maintaining mobility and overall health. Below is a link to 'The Benefits of Aquatic Therapy for the Aging Population" http://www.mccc.edu/—behrensb/documents/Aguatictherapy.pdf 9: We do not believe this is applicable to this project. We believe our Variance request meets the majority of these criteria for reasons stated above. Thank you, Jeremiah Lord Board of Adjustment 16 Case No. WA-16-09/Martin WHEAT RIDGE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTION CASE NO: WA -16-09 APPLICANT NAME: Martin LOCATION OF REQUEST: 3390 Oak Street WHEREAS, the application Case No.WA-16-09 was not eligible for administrative review; and WHEREAS, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law and in recognition that there /were / were nol protests registered against it; and WHEREAS the relief applied for may be granted without detriment to the public welfare and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Board of Adjustment application Case No. WA - 16 -09 be, and hereby is, APPROVED. TYPE OF VARIANCE: Request for approval of a variance to the maximum permitted size for an accessory structure, and a request for approval of a variance to permit a metal accessory structure. FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. The proposed pool cover will appear incidental to the home, and significant property investment will occur as a result of approval of the variance. 2. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. 3. The alleged hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. 4. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare. 5. No objections were received regarding the variance request. M 7. ... WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The design and architecture of the proposed enclosure shall be consistent with representations depicted in the application materials, subject to staff review and approval through review of a building permit. 2. If any existing tree is removed or becomes damaged, diseased or dead, it shall be replaced with a minimum 2" caliper tree or 6 -foot tall evergreen tree. 41 1 City of Wheatidge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29'h Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 LETTER NOTICE (As required pursuant to Code Section 26-109.D) July 13, 2016 Dear Property Owner: This letter is to inform you of Case No. WA -16-09, a request for two variances. The first is a request for a variance to the maximum size permitted for an accessory structure in the R-1 zone district. The second is a request for a variance to permit a metal accessory structure located at 3390 Oak Street. This request is scheduled for a public hearing in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29`h Avenue. The schedule is as follows: Board of Adiustment July 28, 201617, 7:00 p.m. As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at 303-235-2846. Thank you, City of Wheat Ridge Planning Division Individuals with disabilities are encouraged to participate in all public meetings sponsored by the City of Wheat Ridge. If you need inclusion assistance, please call Carly Lorentz, Assistant to the City Manager at 303-235-2867 at least one week in advance of a meeting. W A 1609.doc �`- ' " - � ;fit � "` •, — LYYJ? r f aw` .err l.a'� ABBOTT THOMAS L ABBOTT ISABEL ANTON KAREN A ANTON DONALD R BRIGGS ROBERT S BRIGGS DEBRA M 10780 W 35TH AVE 3470 NELSON ST 3490 NELSON ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 CLARK JULIE 10555 W 34TH AVE WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 ELIZABETH B HAMPTON TRUST 3350 OAK ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 HOLTON EDWARD E HOLTON JENNIFER R 3355 NELSON ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 KOENTGES PATRICK J 3391 OAK ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 MARTIN JEAN BECKMANN 3375 NELSON ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 ROBERTS BARBARA ANN 3475 MOORE CT WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 SHPALL ZACHARY I ROSENTHAL DEBRA L 3395 NELSON ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 SNYDER MAXINE M SNYDER WARREN EUGENE 3400 NELSON ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 CORDOVA MARGARET C JEWELL LOYE DOUGLAS 3330 OAK ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 GRIGEL PAUL W 10651 W 34TH PL WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 HUGGARD SEAN HUGGARD JENNIFER 3415 NELSON ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 LAURITA FRED M LAURITA ROSEMARY A 10750 W 35TH AVE WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 MILLER WAYNE A MILLER NADINE P 3320 NELSON ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 ROLLINS JAY N 3351 OAK ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 SMITH MARION L 10600 W 35TH AVE WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 SRNKA KRIS 3335 NELSON ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 EDLIN FAMILY TRUST 3485 NELSON ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 HILL BENJAMIN PATRICK HILL TONIA ROSE 10875 W 32ND AVE WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 HYLAND CATHLEEN M 3440 NELSON ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 LIVINGSTON HAROLD A LIVINGSTON MELISA 3331 OAK ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 MORA JESSE JR MORA GLORIA JEAN 3371 OAK ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 SANCHEZ JEANNE T SANCHEZ LEONARD J 10620 W 35TH AVE WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 SNELL CAROL A SNELL WILLIAM A 3330 NELSON ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 STOYKO ROBERT FIGLUS ODARKA 10580 W 34TH AVE WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 TASSIO BETTY JEAN TUUK DAVID J TUUK MARY K W KATHRYN MARTIN LIVING TRUST 3455 MOORE CT 10701 W 34TH PL 3390 OAK ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 WARING NANCY P WARING BRUCE J WILLIAMS EUNICE P WILMA I ZELLITTI TRUST THE 3370 OAK ST 3381 OAK ST 10751 W 34TH PL WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 YOUNG VICKI 10740 W 35TH AVE WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 =DESIGNS BY SUNDOWN= 0 5' .0 SCALE: 1"=10'-O" W U Z M W o o (nO � � U w O ai [If C Z_Mcu -c L.L > cQ G DESIGNED: JL DRAWN: JL CHECKED: —C— E—MR E00'F NT W-RLAv SA'ELI i'E ANS SET - SHEET NUMBER: L-2 LLJ U Z M W o o�co U 00 W 0 m rn Z c' cu L.L S� L DESIGNED: JL DRAWN: JL CHECKED: SHEET NUMBER: L-1 w 1 ! I fok� 'Z`�l►, � �• : i FT's , • i+ ty fA r I a r r i a' r h AL �'• # r `I R LLJ U Z M W o o�co U 00 W 0 m rn Z c' cu L.L S� L DESIGNED: JL DRAWN: JL CHECKED: SHEET NUMBER: L-1 0 Designers: Jeremiah Lord Scale: Not to Scale This document is the property of Designs By Sundown and should not be reproduced, copied or used for installation purposes, in whole or in part, without the consent of Designs By Sundown. 29' 25' Martin Residence 3390 Oak Street, Wheat Ridge CO 80033 Concept 3D Image Jam- ]'? vOJ' Ing ,tea w1 �d�5 . -tc� L ✓es�4 a �-� � d�-� O�0 .,?�� � � �r + Ick rotye C4A'I' 91 11 DESIGNS 4Y SUNDOWN Renderings by Silvia Gramegna Date: 6/29/16 Martin Residence 3390 Oak Street, Wheat Ridge CO 80033 Concept 3D Image Jam- ]'? vOJ' Ing ,tea w1 �d�5 . -tc� L ✓es�4 a �-� � d�-� O�0 .,?�� � � �r + Ick rotye C4A'I' 91 11 DESIGNS 4Y SUNDOWN Renderings by Silvia Gramegna Date: 6/29/16 d L C d E R V O U 2 0 "6 C O 2 `o IE 1 M V00 M 0 O 0 c' v a�� M 3 a a V v O Ln v Lam- ro m 0 50 O, M M ), 0 o `o c a N 0 V QI 4-7 0 3 .r- `o 118 r 4 II a 0 v c �d ;a a rn 0 v Q1 �cO _C 0 M a v v c 0 v s L E A d o y o c Z av � � c l Ir' vo c O O 0 L 3 o 01 \CL o• a r I'$ 0 Variance Review Criteria Responses For: Martin Project 3390 Oak st. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 1: The pools use would be limited to use only %: of the year because of the climate here. Also there is a higher return on the investment because of the fact it could be used with much higher frequency. 2: We absolutely do not believe this pool enclosure structure, would in any way alter the character of the locality, feel out of place or out of character in this neighborhood. 3: The Martin's are planning to invest a substantial amount of money to such an extent that it could likely raise surrounding properties value. The total cost of the entire project including landscaping elements is nearly half the current value of the home. The pool enclosure piece which represents 1/3`d of the total cost of the project would not be possible without a variance given the current zoning standards. 4: There are no issues here as it relates to this project. 5: No unique hardship has been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. 6: We believe there are no foreseeable detrimental issues like the ones stated here that would result from the granting of this variance. 7: There are other built in pools in this neighborhood that is not unique, while the request for variance is unique regarding a pool enclosure it seems more because no one has asked or attempted to do one like this but it is a logical addition to a pool area. 8: Granting this variance would result in a reasonable accommodation for Mr. & Mrs. Martin in terms of their ability to easily access and use the pool regularly year-round as a preventative therapy for maintaining mobility and overall health. Below is a link to "The Benefits of Aquatic Therapy for the Aging Population" http://www.mccc.edu/—behrensb/documents/Aguatictherapv.pdf 9: We do not believe this is applicable to this project. We believe our Variance request meets the majority of these criteria for reasons stated above. Thank you, Jeremiah Lord --.aow.a .au, .nvws nv�ian amsaen inw.0 ,F9 s ,SE3ZI5 38fISOlJN3 a aw�u . o. ax rss. m •me .rn w avrm a avoma Ll 'Ef008 00 '3001H 1V3HM 2962-C99 (6127 ,�o� S5 s w+rwsnri�onwov1f10AVl 100d W � 133HIS 8 N 06EE ..4 699 i roe �oNij aW0_ Q2UI�Q30N301S3H N11tlVW do.M.* 'Wd aowu wu urma� .Li1N axs�.a) .ro�.v. 9 ° .E9) ,SE :3ZIS 3!lf1501ON3 id Fw 1"lili »°u IwiU nsa'n� s'iul�w aMns.�':vA" Oi fuON lLL SNIIR]I M IDNO SOS TI it }OSwr.0 9Oi VAIN® ; ^e 7 4 NOI11SOd 030N31X3 " EE008 00 '3001H 1tl31W 2962-C99 (612) "'J inOAtll 38f1SOlON3 q i 133b1S WO 06EE 0262-e99 (612) —04d 30N301S3tl NLLNVYIA M d 1-1--M S2011 �mw.0 'cw. ivaras .)u�an am)sa) (roue ' k . ara awru r as a>oissv mwo. uw «t and a asm0ma 9 Y St s ,SE 3ZIS 3NOSOlON3 a iw •.a +1Ni .w aru(n ansae) sn) >,u aa. auv nw � � � _ gg 7 0. soma >H. ssnrosa a.. sa"a sm w s( sm.xr.o �mx unuuax � Y '^ t EEO08 00 3DO18 LV3HM 2962-f99 (612) ..j :v'von'.arooe�xn� NOI11SOd 030N31%3 0262-f99 (612) 'e�o4d aw0 euA 1nOAVl 3dnSOlON3 i3 133tl IS 8VO 06ff LOE9a w 'WI -d..1 u.. aol a a _ E E ae 3ON30153!! NIINVW Ao.>9V a'oecie0 52011 ` y i ♦�A�f City of' " Wheat -Midge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Community Development 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Ph: 303.235.2846 Fax: 303.235.2857 Community Development Referral Form Date Mailed: 7/1/16 Response Due: 7/15/16 The Wheat Ridge Community Development Department has received a request for approval of a Variance at 3390 Oak Street. No response from you will constitute having no objections or concerns regarding this proposal. Case No.: WA -16-09/ Martin Request: The applicant is requesting a variance for the maximum size of an accessory structure and a variance to allow a metal accessory structure over 120 square feet. The applicant requests this variance to construct a retractable pool enclosure on a property zoned Residential -One (R-1). Please respond to this request in writing regarding your ability to serve the property. Please specify any new infrastructure needed or improvements to existing infrastructure that will be required. Include any easements that will be essential to serve the property as a result of this development. Please detail the requirements for development in respect to your rules and regulations. If you need further clarification, contact the case manager: Case Manager: Lisa Ritchie Phone: 303.235.2852 Email:Iritchie@ci.wheatridge.co.us Fax: 303.235.2847 DISTRIBUTION: Fire District Wheat Ridge Building Division Vicinity Map A West Metro Fire Protection District 433 S. Allison Parkway Lakewood. CO 80226 Bus: (303) 989-4307 Fax: (303) 989-6725 www.westmetrofire.org July 5, 2016 Lisa Ritchie Planner II 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 303-235-2852 Re: Case #WA -16-09 — Martin Variance Dear Ms. Ritchie. This property is within the West Metro Fire Protection District (WMFPD). Fire service will be provided as long as provisions of the International Fire Code, 2012 edition, including amendments. are maintained. WMFPD has no comment or concerns with this proposed variance. WMFPD reserves the right to provide additional comments/requirements if there are any changes to the application. If you have any questions contact me at 303-989-4307 extension 705 or e-mail: kbrooks(ii)westmetrofire.org. Respectfully, Kelly Brooks Deputy Fire Marshal � � � � submitted 1 11 City Of planner. In " 9 W heat �ge be acceptea LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION Community Development Department 7500 West 29`, Avenue • Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 • Phone (303) 235-2846 �/ /O� (Please print or type all information) O 1 Applicant 2 51 hS h��✓�U�`'✓t'I Phone 's3-Y3S�Y, mail �1!`or�1 Address, City, Sta , Zip 6,715 S. .Sv.,-lot 77- Owner 4 /�r i hone Address, City, State, Zip 9� (ia4 � t, Contact--�e>rei'1�ot '1 /xol�/ Phone Address, City, State, Zip 6g -Z!; $� 4;4 re' 1 Syria 195 / 6 60)'7c .1 • �%35-0?9 mail �.o� n� / / / (The person listed as contact will be contacted to answer questions regarding this application, provide additional information when necessary.. post public hearing signs, will receive a copy of the staff report prior to Public Clearing, and shall be responsible for forwarding all verbal and written communication to applicant and owner.) Location of request (address): 7 Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request): O Change of Zone or Zone Conditions O Special Use Permit O Subdivision - specify type: O Planned Development (ODP, SDP) O Conditional Use Permit O Administrative (up to 3 lots) O Planned Building Group O Site Plan O Minor (4 or 5 lots) O Temporary Use, Building, Sign O Concept Plan O Major (6 or more lots) O Variance/Waiver (from Section 26-) O Right of Way Vacation O Other: Detailed description of request: re-✓`o�tG t/' •�C' / py !, ; n pl 7�i r I/D1 �'0 ^ C C Q f� SG� �T T tnno,�' a� me fir 1 certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, 1 am acting with the knowledge d consent of tho persons .11 ted above, without whose consent the requested action cannot larifully be accomplishe Applicant other an nerW-WROW p.qe ttorney from the owner which approved of this action on behalf i/ NOTARY PUBLIC Notarized Signature of Applicant_ State of Colorado County of �Gi,aG.1Rp� } ss STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID 20084015708 MMlSSION EXPIRES MARCH 25, The foregoing instrument (Land Use ProcessingApplication) was acknowledged by me this ��`day of u 20 Flo by 0 L 4Notaublic/ To be filled out b staff: Date received (, - 1L Comp Plan Design. Related Case No. Assessor's Parcel No. Size (acres or sgft) 2s, t S(, S} Rev 122/ 2016 My commission expires -/QS /201 9 Fee $ 41,26. D Receipt No. Pre -App Mtg. Date Current Zoning —1 Proposed Zoning Case No. Wry - j� 'L-8 Quarter Section Map Case Manager Current Use Proposed Use + 4-!; :SAN :GN P E� ANJUNT 4, A.6e PA"MEhr uMliLALki rH�LKi •cy3� 4C T 4L - ---------------- ----------------------- t2g.ag City of W heat Idge NIT COMMUY DEVELOPMENT Submittal Checklist: Variance Project Name: �°"��'`� ' ' of ed � c l Project Location: v'' • (746 33 Application Contents: A variance provides relief from the strict application of zoning standards in instances where a unique physical hardship is present. The following items represent a complete variance application: §1. Completed, notarized land use application form :2. Application fee X 3. Signed submittal checklist (this document) X 4. Proof of ownership—e.g. deed 5. Written authorization from property owner(s) if an agent acts on behalf of the owner(s) _6. Written request and description of the proposal Include a response to the variance review criteria—these are found in Section 26-115 of the municipal code Include an explanation as to why alternate designs that may comply with the zoning standards are not feasible Include an explanation of the unique physical hardship that necessitates relief 7. Surrey or Improvement Location Certificate (ILC) of the property 8. To -scale site plan indicating existing and proposed building footprints and setbacks �,_9. Proposed building elevations indicating proposed heights, materials, and color scheme Rev. 5/2014 As applicant for this project, I hereby ensure that all of the above requirements have been included with this submittal. I fully understand that if any one of the items listed on this checklist has been excluded, the documents will NOT be distributed for City reXiew. In addition, I understand that in the event any revisions need to be made after the sec nd (r) full review, I will be subject to the applicable resubmittal fee. /, Signature: Name (please print): Date: Phone: Community Development Department - (303) 235-2846 - www.ci.wheatridge.co.us N W E S 42.0' WEST 34TH PLACE LOT AREA = 25,156 S.F. HOUSE & PATIO AREA = 3,937 S.F. TOTAL LIVING AREA = 3,767 S.F. LOT COVERAGE = 15.7% DRIVEWAY/SIDEWALK LOT COVERAGE = 6.3% WARNING 1. LOCATE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. 2. THIS PLOT PLAN SHOWS IMPROVEMENTS AT GRADE AND GRADING ONLY. SEE FOUNDATION PLAN FOR STRUCTURAL INFORMATION. 7.58 LOT 7 140.00' KEN AMR L 45.0' 19.0' b I 0 LOT 6 KEN MAR SUED. r SuBO. LOT 14 » - 1 30 SCALE. ASCEA7ENGRWERING C10 Engineering Consultants 7910 Ralston Road, Suite #4 Arvada, Colorado 80004 - (303) 456-6518 FAX (3n3) 463-2965 NOTES: 1. ALL SWALE All 0' 0' MINIMUM. 2. TOP OF FOUNDATION (TF) = SWALE HIGH POINT + 1.0' 3. DROP GARAGE FLOOR SLAB 1.4' TO FLATTEN DRIVE SLOPE. 4. DROP GARAGE DOOR HEADER. PLOT PLAN LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 13&14 DISTINCTIVE ADDRESSES AT APPLEWOOD WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO AUUMISZO: 3390 OAK STREET PREPARED FOR I DATE: DWG. N0. PROJECT N1 DAVID SCHNIEDER 09-19-00 MARTIN -PP I NA 10' E. / " 15 ' - - - .0' _ Ko 92 45.0' I I 92 30 93 DMW _ 94 Y . 5.0, - :L ------ --- 9.0. �3 33.5' 4. 37.4' i X,�` I 0' 3 -CAR GARAGt:' I m 93 94 I 94 ss I 8' 68.9' I f —�--- 95 -9 I Li 95 k o SINGLE -STORY B a F v I 7F-97.0 96 I I w ------ - -- 4--m -- _ 96 > I 3 V .........: - - -95- - - 96.0 - s - -95= I 10' U.E. - — —38.0' I / 96 B1IILDIN AC1C9. 35.00' _._.CK9 . _......................................... `: ru LOT AREA = 25,156 S.F. HOUSE & PATIO AREA = 3,937 S.F. TOTAL LIVING AREA = 3,767 S.F. LOT COVERAGE = 15.7% DRIVEWAY/SIDEWALK LOT COVERAGE = 6.3% WARNING 1. LOCATE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. 2. THIS PLOT PLAN SHOWS IMPROVEMENTS AT GRADE AND GRADING ONLY. SEE FOUNDATION PLAN FOR STRUCTURAL INFORMATION. 7.58 LOT 7 140.00' KEN AMR L 45.0' 19.0' b I 0 LOT 6 KEN MAR SUED. r SuBO. LOT 14 » - 1 30 SCALE. ASCEA7ENGRWERING C10 Engineering Consultants 7910 Ralston Road, Suite #4 Arvada, Colorado 80004 - (303) 456-6518 FAX (3n3) 463-2965 NOTES: 1. ALL SWALE All 0' 0' MINIMUM. 2. TOP OF FOUNDATION (TF) = SWALE HIGH POINT + 1.0' 3. DROP GARAGE FLOOR SLAB 1.4' TO FLATTEN DRIVE SLOPE. 4. DROP GARAGE DOOR HEADER. PLOT PLAN LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 13&14 DISTINCTIVE ADDRESSES AT APPLEWOOD WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO AUUMISZO: 3390 OAK STREET PREPARED FOR I DATE: DWG. N0. PROJECT N1 DAVID SCHNIEDER 09-19-00 MARTIN -PP I NA RE: Variance Request for 3390 Oak St. To whom it may concern at City of Wheat Ridge: Hello my name is Jeremiah Lord a Landscape Designer with Designs By Sundown. We are seeking a variance on behalf of our customers Mr. and Mrs. Martin at 3390 Oak St. Wheat Ridge CO 80033. We are proposing to do a large landscaping renovation with the Martin's which includes a built in swimming pool and hot tub, pool decking and patio space along with several other elements which would not require a Variance. The Martins being a mature retired couple use a pool regularly as part of their health regiment to remain active and mobile. They want to have a pool that they can both enjoy with grandchildren and stay healthy using it year round. This project would also substantially increase their property value which they ultimately intend to pass onto their children as they never intend to move again. The anticipated cost of this entire project could actually exceed half of their current property value. They have asked us to design and build a retractable pool enclosure structure in conjunction with the rest of their project so that in the summer they can enjoy the pool outside, and in the winter close it up and continue to be able to use it year-round. We run into two apparent issues to be in compliance with existing zoning standards with regard to the retractable enclosure. 1. Total allowable sq. ft being 1000 we are asking for approximately 1300sf. We want to have the area big enough to accommodate a pool and hot tub big enough to justify the investment and practical use of the amenity. 2. Building material: The only practical material that accomplishes both structural integrity, weather resistance, durability, lightweight, and the ability to be re -tractable is Aluminum (which would be anodized to a bronze or gray color to blend in with house) The Glazing is a 5/8" thick poly carbonate sheeting. I believe the spirit of the existing code which does not allow any "metal" building structures was largely intended to discourage un- attractive steel buildings having an out of place commercial and or flimsy tin shed look to spoil the pleasing residential environment. From an investment standpoint the ability to have year-round use of the pool creates a lot more intrinsic value to the home owner for the cost of the project effectively doubling its use. It also has value for the environment and energy savings as there is no need to cool the building in the summer, and on sunny days no need for heat in the winter and less energy to heat the pool and or hot tub as well even on non -sunny winter days. This is a unique case and situation, as you can see by the renderings and photo's provided it is a very attractive, functional safe and sturdy structure that meets snow load and building code requirements, we feel it would in no way be intrusive or out of context in this neighborhood. The existing yard is also completely surrounded by large mature tree's none of which would be affected or removed. The neighbor directly behind the Martins would be the only ones impacted by the view corridor and currently all they see are tree's and the Martins roof, not mountains or open view, they also have a pool too and may be interested in doing something similar as the Martin's. Thank you for your time and consideration we sincerely hope we can work with you to make this project work for everyone involved. Sincerely, Jeremiah Lord Designs by Sundown 303-435-2965 jlord@designsbysundown.com I Roy Martin Property owner at 3390 Oak St. Wheat Ridge CO 80033 do hereby authorize Jeremiah Lord with Designs by Sundown (contractor) to act as an agent on our behalf with regard to the Application and execution of a Variance with the City of Wheat Ridge for the Martin Project relating to a retractable pool enclosure structure. �,/ 7 Signed � �� d c `, Date JProperty '��.. • • . • • -, Information "F' 1 OF 1 GENERAL INFORMATION PIN/Schedule: 300436211 AIN/Parcel ID: 39-281-17-022 Status: Active Property Type: Residential Property Address: 03390 OAK ST Owner Name (s) WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 JW KATHRYN TINLIVING TRUST Mailing Address: SAME ADDRESS AS PROPERTY Neighborhood: 2403 - APPLEWOOD VILLAGES, PROSPECT VALLEY AREAS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Subdivision Name: 209260 - DISTINCTIVE ADDRESSES AT APP[ EWOOD_Ar,1D 7 Block Lot Key Section Township Range QuarterSection Land Sqft 013A 28 13 169 NE 25156 Total 25156 Assessor Parcel Maps Associated with Schedule pmao3Q-2$1 ori` Interactive Map PROPERTYINVENTORY Property Type RESID Design: Ranch Item MAIN BEDROOM lQuality No. 3 FULL BATH Good 1 3FIX-3/4 BATH Good 2 MAIN FIREPLCE Good 2 CENTRAL AIR Good 0 SALE HISTORY Year Built: 2001 Improvement Number: 1 Adjusted Year Built: 2001 Areas Quality 1construction Sqft FIRST FLOOR Good M 2891 ATTACH GARAGE Good M 752 BSMT TOTAL Good 2891 COVERED PORCH Good 182 BSMT FINISHED Good 1445 Sale Date Sale Amount Deed Type Reception 10-13-2000 0 Plat F1129146 11-14-2003 0 Warranty Deed F1909583 09-09-2009 0 Warranty Deed 2010006728 INA jLnrymmmijLvn 2016 Payable 2017 2016 2015 2016 Mill Levy Information Actual Value Total 666,830 County TBA Assessed Value Total 53,079 2015 Payable 2016 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DIST TBA Actual Value Total 666,830 URBAN DRAINAGE&FLOOD C SO PLAT TBA Assessed Value Total 53,079 Treasurer Information View Mill Levy Detail For Year 2016 2015 2016 Mill Levy Information Tax District 3141 County TBA School TBA WHEAT RIDGE TBA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DIST TBA URBAN DRAINAGE&FLOOD CONT DIST TBA URBAN DRAINAGE&FLOOD C SO PLAT TBA WHEATRIDGE FIRE DIST TBA WESTRIDGE SAN DIST TRA Enclosure Sizes I DynaDome Custom Pool Enclosures Page I of 4 DynaDome Custom Pool Enclosures Home About Gallery Features Design Contact Us Request a Quote Blog You are here: Home u Design & Construction u Endosure Sizes Enclosure Sizes HenMum Inlwnol Height. 7 N wow `�� SPANS , 50 upfo ft. Y �+ Kededld Io c Co / �J 4oriN. DynaMne Incremenh Enclosure Sizing Information DynaDome Enclosure Sizes DynaDome Can Go the Distance! Structural Framing Lengths begin at 12' and increase in 4' or 6' increments to any length. Maximum standard span is 60' residential. The slope of the DynaDome pool enclosure roof is a 3:12 pitch. The smallest internal side-wall height is 7 feet. Commercial Applications For widths greater than 60', our engineering department will provide a DynaDome enclosure solution. Call for commercial applications and our engineers can discuss the various options available for spans greater than t ,� x MiNmum No Moidmum Length Length: 12 tt. 4 r� ,6LLL, .rL..�w>rr i■dlllllllllll�ll lltlt in tl�c kNo►�cd9c � y G+ s Design &T Construction Menu Design Considerations http://dynadome.com/design-construction/enclosure-sizes/ 6/30/2016 Enclosure Sizes I DynaDome Custom Pool Enclosures Enclosure Materials Enclosure Sizes Installation Process Warranty Enclosure Benefits Improve Safety V Improve Safety All of our enclosures are equipped with entry/exit doors that have locking hardware with keys Whether you are away on vacation or at work, you can feel safe that there will be no unauthorized access without a key. Kids will not be allowed to go swimming without using the key to gain access Thus, you can feel safe that there won't be any accidents Increase Efficiency Increase Efficiency When your pool is not in use. DynaDome INCREASE always recommends -EFFICIENCY- using a thermal blanket or auto cover During those days that the sun is shining and the enclosure is in the closed position, the heat gain generated from the solar transmission effect is greater than the heat loss through those same panels (greenhouse effect) Thus, the pool water and air temperature are being healed by the sun which translates into less energy costs for you to heat the space or pool' Tighten Security Tighten Security Just like your home, the DynaDome enclosure requires the appropriate key to gain access into the pool area While you are inside the pool, the internal locking hardware allows you to enjoy swimming with peace of mind knowing that others may not gain access Increased Privacy Increased ® Privacy Simply by choosing privacy panels for your polycarbonate choice (white color works best), you can enjoy the pool in your own privacy away from the prying eyes of neighbors or passers-by on the street. All Year Swimming ® All Year Swimming For most of the country, simply adding the enclosure will provide you with year- http://dynadome.com/design-construction/enclosure-sizes/ Page 2 of 4 6/30/2016 Enclosure Sizes I DynaDome Custom Pool Enclosures round swimming without adding any additional heat source to the space For those parts of the country where the average winter temperature is less than 30 degreesan additional heat source may be required to supplement the air temperature to a comfortable level However, in most cases. since the pool is only being used (at most) 2 hours a day.. the other 22 hours of the day do not have to be heated. Thus, proper planning and discussion with our engineers will guide you in the appropriate direction for the ideal space for comfort and year round swimming Less Insects & Pests Fewer Insects When the enclosure is retracted, the pool is obviously outdoors like any other swimming pool without an enclosure But, when the enclosure is extended and covering the pool, the sliding windows with screens allows for the night time breeze without those pesky insects And, when not in use during the daytime, those same Insects are not allowed to enter the pool area and fill up your filters' Less Insect exposure overall' Control UV Exposure Control UV Z Exposure Because all of our panels come equipped with UV blocking agents to block 99% of the harmful UV rays, when the enclosure is closed you do not have to worry about any skin related diseases due to UV Reduce Chemical Use _ Reduce Chemical Use Due to theUV blockage from the REDUCE panels, your pool's -CHEMICAL USE. chemical use is reduced greatly If using a chlorine based system UV is one of the main reasons you need to add chlorine because those UV rays bum the chlorine But with our enclosure's UV blocking panels, the chlorine needs are greatly reduced Decrease Maintenance Decrease Maintenance Maintenance will be a task of the past with DECREASE our DynaDome -MAIIENANCE- enclosure. No more skimming the insects, leaves, dirt or debns Greatly reduced chemical needs so you won't be spending time balancing the pH levels of your water. No lime needed to do any cleaning at all. Just open the enclosure and start swimming' http://dynadome.com/design-construction/enclosure-sizes/ Page 3 of 4 6/30/2016 Enclosure Materials I DynaDome Custom Pool Enclosures Page 1 of 4 DynaDome Custom Pool Enclosures Home About Gallery Features Design Contact Us Request a Quote Blog You are here. Home . Design & Construction . Enclosure Materials Enclosure Materials DynaDome Enclosure Materials: Structural Extrusions The Main Building Material of DynaDome Enclosures Our framing members and track are 6061-T6 and 6063-T5 aircraft -quality, high-strength �l r�rAm� Ai0MbWMiEeWT*VNMWWW a full 20 years, our finish will not rust or peel like the alternative powder - coated finishes used by other manufacturers. DynaDome Enclosure Materials: Polycarbonate Glazing DynaDome Enclosure Outside 'Skins' The roof panels are glazed with 16mm (5/8") multi -wall polycarbonate sheets. The vertical walls are glazed using either a combination of transparent solid sheet and 16mm translucent polycarbonate sheet, or all transparent solid sheet to give you that glass room look. The glazing material is fastened using our Thermal Break Fastener Design system. The standard color is clear; tinted bronze, opal and white colors are also available options. Read this article to learn more about the properties and performance characteristics of polycarbonate: http://continuingeducation.construction com/article php?L=307&C=913&P=4 DynaDome Enclosure Materials: Rollers & Fasteners High Quality Parts Which Last the Life of the Structure! http://dynadome.com/design-construction/enclosure-materials/ 6/30/2016 Bi -Folding End Panels I DynaDome Custom Pool Enclosures Page l of 2 DynaDome Custom Pool Enclosures Home About Gallery Features Design Contact Us Request a Quote Blog You are here: Home A Product Features . Bi -Folding End Panels Bi -Folding End Panels ��lxvz the k►wwlcd�C � G+ Features Menu Bi -Folding End Panels End panels fold open to the sides, providing maximum ventilation. Also allows you to retract the enclosure without moving pool furniture. http://dynadome.com/pool-enclosure-features/bi-folding-end-panels/ 6/30/2016 Bi -Folding End Panels I DynaDome Custom Pool Enclosures Page 2 of 2 Never -Jam Track System Anodized Surface Finishing Full -View Sliding Windows Motorized Roof Panels Bi -Folding End Panels Thermal Break System Walkways Full -View Sliding Doors Customer Testimonials March 2012 I Bloomington, IN I Four Winds Resort Sr Marina Hi DynaDome. We at the Four Winds Resort and Manna are very happy to write a testimonial. We have had our DynaDome for over two years now and love it. We started our process to enclose our pool with phone calls to many companies We found y... Read More Testimonials n CONTACT INFO Recent Company News Subscribe to our Testimonial Newsletter '• Can You Swim in the Winter with a Pool Enclosure? First name March 20121 Bloomington, IN I Four Winds Resort &Marina Last .- - - - Among many of the other benefits, one of the best things having name Email Hi DynaDome, DynaDome Custom Pool y about a swimming .. November 24. 2014 read more We at the FourWnds Enclosures Subscribe! Resort and Marina 11025 Delaware Parkway are very happy to kr� Getting an Enclosure for Crown Point. IN 40307, USA Your Restaurant Patio write a testimonial We have had our DynaDome for over Call Us: Although were generally touted as a two years now and love it. We started PH: (800) 726 DYNA (3962) swimming pool enclosure builder, it is no our process to enclose our pool with doubt that phone calls to many companies We PH: (219) 663 2920 November 17, 2014 read more found you on the Web and made a call. FX: (219) 663 2962 From your first return call on our inquiry Follow DynaDome tteillillr Who is the Best Pool Enclosure Company? to the very last call after we bought the Dome and it was installed we had a Maybe you've been giving some deep perfectly wonderful experience Your thought and consideration into having an great company and staff quoted, built, enclosure installed for and installed exactly w... October 13, 2014 read more Read More Testimonials C2012 DynaDome Custom Pool Enclosures All rights reserved Home About Products Testimonials Contact Us Sitemap Request a Quote http://dynadome-com/pool-enclosure-features/bi-folding-end-panels/ 6/30/2016 Enclosure Materials I DynaDome Custom Pool Enclosures Rollers Stainless steel roller bearings require no maintenance. Fasteners All fasteners are stainless steel. �Stia�z tGr ki,,ovk e G-- 9) G►� l.'r Design br Construction Menu Design Considerations Enclosure Materials Enclosure Sizes Installation Process Warranty Enclosure Benefits Improve Safety Improve Safety Al of our enclosures are equipped with entry/exit doors that have locking hardware with keys Whether you are away on vacation or at work, you can feel safe that there will be no unauthorized access without a key. Kids will not be allowed to go swimming without using the key to gain access Thus, you can feel safe that there won't be any accidents. Increase Efficiency Increase Efficiency When your pool is not all in use, DynaDome INCREASE always recommends -EFFICIENCY. using a thermal blanket or auto cover During those days that the sun is shining and the enclosure is in the closed position, the heat gain generated from the solar transmission effect is greater than the heal loss through those same panels (greenhouse effect) Thus. the pool water and air temperature are being heated by the sun which translates into less energy costs for you to heat the space or pool' Tighten Security ® Tighten Security Just like your home, the DynaDome encAosure requires the appropriate key to gain access into the pool area. While you are inside the pool, the internal locking hardware allows you to Page 2 of 4 http://dynadome.com/design-construction/enclosure-materials/ 6/30/2016 Enclosure Materials I DynaDome Custom Pool Enclosures enjoy swimming with peace of mind knowing that others may not gain access Increased Privacy ® Increased Privacy Simply by choosing privacy panels for your polycarbonate choice (while color works best), you can enjoy the pool in your own privacy away from the prying eyes of neighbors or passers-by on the street All Year Swimming All Year Z Swimming For most of the country, simply adding the enclosure will provide you with year- round swimming without adding any additional heat source to the space For those parts of the country where the average winter temperature is less than 30 degrees, an additional heat source may be required to supplement the air temperature to a comfortable level. However, in most cases since the pool is only being used (at most) 2 hours a day. the other 22 hours of the day do not have to be heated Thus, proper planning and discussion with our engineers will guide you in the appropriate direction for the ideal space for comfort and year round swimming Less Insects & Pests Fewer Insects When the enclosure is retracted, the pool is obviously outdoors like any other swimming pool without an enclosure But, when the enclosure is extended and covering the pool. the sliding windows with screens allows for the night time breeze without those pesky insects And, when not in use during the daytime, those same insects are not allowed to enter the pool area and fill up your filters' Less insect exposure overall' Control UV Exposure Control UV ® Exposure Because all of our panels come equipped with UV blocking agents to block 99% of the harmful UV rays, when the enclosure is closed you do not have to worry about any skin related diseases due to uv Reduce Chemical Use Page 3 of 4 http://dynadome.com/design-construction/enclosure-materials/ 6/30/2016 Reduce Chemical Use Due to theLIV blockage fromthe REDUCE panels, your pools -CHEMICAL USE chemical use is reduced greatly if Page 3 of 4 http://dynadome.com/design-construction/enclosure-materials/ 6/30/2016 Enclosure Materials I DynaDome Custom Pool Enclosures using a chlorine based system UV is one of the main reasons you need to add chlorine because those UV rays bum the chlorine. But with our enclosure's UV blocking panels, the chlorine needs are greatly reduced Decrease Maintenance Decrease Maintenance _ Maintenance will be a task of the past with DECREASE our DynaDome .MAIEENANGE• enclosure. No more skimming the insects, leaves, dirt or debris. Greatly reduced chemical needs so you won't be spending time balancing the pH levels of your water. No time needed to do any cleaning at all Just open the enclosure and start swimming - Page 4 of 4 CONTACT INFO Recent Company News Subscribe to our Testimonial Newsletter Im Can You Swim in the Winter with a Pool Enclosure? First name March 20121 Bloomington, IN I Four Winds Resort & Marina - Among Last name many of the other benefits, one of the best things about having a swimming Email Hi DynaDome DynaDome Custom Pool We at the FourWndsResort Enclosures November 24, 2014 read more Subscribe! and Marina 11025 Delaware Parkway YrAM Getting an Enclosure for are very happy to Crown Point, IN 40307, USA Your Restaurant Patio write a testimonial We have had our DynaDome for over Call Us: Although we're generally touted as a two years now and love it We started swimming pool enclosure budder. it is no our process to enclose our pool with PH: (800) 726. DYNA (3962) doubt that _. phone calls to many companies We PH: (219) 663.2920 November 17, 2014 read more found you on the Web and made a call FX: (219) 663.2962 From your first return call on our inquiry Follow DynaDome is Who is the Best Pool Enclosure Company? to the very last call after we bought the Dome and it was installed we had a Maybe you've been giving some deep perfectly wonderful experience Your © ®© ® thought and consideration into having an great company and staff quoted, built, enclosure installed for _. and installed exactly w. October 13. 2014 read more Read More Testimonials . 02012 DynaDome Custom Pool Enclosures. All rights reserved Home About Products Testimonials Contact Us Sitemap Request a Quote http://dynadome.com/design-construction/enclosure-materials/ 6/30/2016 1AW MOM I r Uri WN 11 1