The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWA-16-17City of W heat �d�-e COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building December 22, 2016 Jerry R. Briano 2895 Fenton Street Wheat Ridge, CO 80214 Re: Case No. WA -16-17 Dear Mr. Briano: 7500 W. 291h Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 Please be advised that your request for a 5 -foot variance from the 10 -foot side setback requirement for a corner lot to allow an addition to a single family residence in the Residential - One C (R -1C) zone district for property located at 2985 Fenton Street has been approved. Enclosed is a copy of the Approval of Variance. Please note that all variance requests automatically expire within 180 days (June 5, 2017) of the date it was granted unless a building permit for the variance has been obtained within such period of time. You are now welcome to apply for a building permit to construct the addition. Please feel free to be in touch with any further questions. Sincerely, Tammy Odean Administrative Assistant Enclosure: Approval of Variance Cc: WA -16-17 (case file) WA1617.doc www.ci.w h eatri dge.co. u s 7500 West 29th AvenueCity of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 F WheatR�de 303.235.2846 Fax: 303.235.2857 Approval of Variance WHEREAS, an application for a variance was submitted for the property located at 2895 Fenton Street referenced as Case No. WA -16-17 / Briano; and WHEREAS, City staff found basis for approval of the variance, relying on criteria listed in Section 26-115 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws and on information submitted in the case file; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has properly notified pursuant to Section 26-109 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws; and WHEREAS, there were no registered objections regarding the application; NOW THEREFORE, be it hereby resolved that a 5 -foot variance from the 10 -foot side setback requirement for a corner lot to allow an addition to a single family residence for property located at 2895 Fenton Street and zoned Residential -One C (R-1 C), based on the following findings of fact: 1. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. 2. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare. 3. The request is consistent with the Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy and Comprehensive Plan policies to encourage upgrades and improvements to existing housing stock. With the following conditions: 1. The design of the addition shall be consistent with the application materials and provided exhibits, subject to staff review and approval through a building permit. 1 Kenneth Johnstone, A10C/ Community Development Director Date City of Wh6atRsLdge CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO: Community Development Director DATE: November 28, 2016 CASE MANAGER: Lisa Ritchie CASE NO. & NAME: WA -16-17 / Briano ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a 5 -foot (50%) variance from the 10 -foot side setback requirement for a corner lot to allow an addition to a single family residence on property located at 2895 Fenton Street and zoned Residential -One C (R-1 C) LOCATION OF REQUEST: 2895 Fenton Street APPLICANT (S): Jerry Briano OWNER (S): Jerry Briano APPROXIMATE AREA: 7,601 Square Feet (0.17 Acres) PRESENT ZONING: Residential -One C (R -1C) PRESENT LAND USE: Single Family Residential ENTER INTO RECORD: (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) ZONING ORDINANCE (X) NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION STRATEGY Administrative Variance Case No. WA -16-17 / Briano JURISDICTION: All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore there is jurisdiction to make an administrative decision. I. REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a 5 -foot (50%) variance from the 10 -foot side setback requirement for a corner lot, resulting in an addition with a 5 -foot side setback. The purpose of the variance is to allow the construction of an addition on the north side of an existing single family house. Section 26-208 of the municipal code requires a 10 -foot side setback for corner lots that are narrower than 60 feet in the R -IC zone district. The subject lot is 52'-2" wide. Section 26-115.0 (Variances and Waivers) of the Wheat Ridge City Code empowers the Director of Community Development to decide upon applications for administrative variances from the strict application of the zoning district development standards that are not in excess of fifty (50) percent of the standard. II. CASE ANALYSIS The variance is being requested so the property owners may construct a 398 square foot addition on the north side of the existing single family home located on the southwest corner of Fenton Street and W. 29th Avenue. The property is Lot 1 of the McIntyre Subdivision, platted in 1955. Per the Jefferson County Assessor, the existing 1,109 square foot home was constructed in 1951. The property is zoned R -IC, as are the majority of the properties to the south. The property across the street on Fenton St is zoned Commercial -One (C-1) and contains an auto repair business. The property directly north across 29th Avenue is the Ashland Reservoir, owned and operated by Denver Water. The property on the northeast corner of 291h Avenue and Fenton Street is a gas station. Beyond these adjacent properties are primarily single and multi -family homes with a mix of zoning. (Exhibit 1, Aerial, Exhibit 2, Zoning Map) The R -1C zone district provides for high quality, safe, quiet and stable medium -density single-family residential neighborhoods, and prohibits activities of any nature which are incompatible with the medium density residential character. For corner lots in the R-1 C zone district, the setback requirement on both street frontages is typically 20 feet. For corner lots that are less than 60 feet in width the street - facing side setback can be reduced in half, so in this case the side setback requirement is 10 feet. The variance request would result in a 5 -foot setback based on the design of the proposed addition. The addition would expand the existing living room and create a dining room, while leaving the remainder of the existing floor plan the intact. The existing footprint of the home is 14 feet from the northern property line, and only expanding the home up to the setback would not provide adequate width for functional floor space. Due to the interior configuration of the home, the proposed floor plan accommodates these desired spaces in a logical manner. Expanding the home to the front or to the rear would not be practical and would require additional interior remodeling and relocation of the other existing rooms. The subject property faces Fenton Street with its side yard abutting 29th Avenue. The existing conditions, including the existing curb, gutter and street of 29th Avenue are proposed to be reconstructed in 2017 as part of the reconstruction of the Ashland Reservoir. The street will be shifted to the north, with a new 6 -foot amenity zone and a 6 -foot detached sidewalk constructed. The northern Variance 2 Case No. WA -16-17 I Briano property line on the subject lot will not be altered by the reconstruction in the right-of-way. Currently, there is no sidewalk and the property line is roughly 3 feet south of the existing curb. The preliminary design for the reconstructed 291h Avenue locates the new curb roughly 17 feet from the property line. (Exhibit 3, Proposed 29th Avenue. Exhibit 4, Proposed Addition Exhibit. Exhibit 3, Applicant Response. Exhibit 6, Site Plan. Exhibit 7, Proposed Floor Plan. Exhibit 8, Photos). III. VARIANCE CRITERIA In order to approve an administrative variance, the Community Development Director must determine that the majority of the "criteria for review" listed in Section 26-115.C.4 of the City Code have been met. The applicant has provided their analysis of the application's compliance with the variance criteria. Staff provides the following review and analysis of the variance criteria. 1. The property in question would not yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located. If the request were denied, the property would continue to yield a reasonable return in use. The property would continue to function as a single-family residence, regardless of the outcome of the variance request. Staff finds this criterion has not been met. 2. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. Due to the planned reconstruction of 291h Avenue in the near future, the character of the immediate vicinity will be changing. While the property line will not be changing, when comparing the current conditions and proposed conditions, the effective setback is similar. The current conditions result in the house being located approximately 17 feet from the back of the curb of 291h Avenue. While the addition will be 5 feet from the back of sidewalk, the proposed reconstruction will result in the new addition being located approximately 21 feet from the back of curb. This property is the only single-family home at the corner, so the setback would not look out of place relative to any other residential property. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 3. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property with this application, which would not be possible without the variance. The applicant is proposing an investment in the property, consistent with the Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy and Comprehensive Plan. It would be possible to construct an addition without the variance if the house were extended to the east or to the west. However, due to the layout of the home's interior, the addition would not serve the desires of the applicant to expand the living space. The NRS calls for reinvestment in the City's smaller, older housing stock. The home is only 1,109 square feet and any additional square footage would be desired by the contemporary homeowner. Staff finds this criterion has been met. Variance Case No. WA -16-17 /Briano 4. The particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved results in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out. The applicant has expressed a hardship related to the interior configuration of the home and the desired remodel. Despite this, there is no particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property that results in a unique hardship. The hardship related to the narrowness of typical R-1 C lots was evaluated in 2015 and addressed through a code amendment that reduced the side setback by half (to 10 feet) for corner lots in the R -1C zone district. Staff finds this criterion has not been met. 5. The alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. The alleged challenge of locating an addition on the property was not created by the current property owner or any person currently having an interest in the property. The current property owner purchased the property in 2011, and thus is not responsible for the existing conditions of the property or the location of the home relative to the setbacks. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 6. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located, by, among other things, substantially or permanently impairing the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or substantially diminishing or impairing property values within the neighborhood. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare and would not be injurious to neighboring property or improvements. It would not hinder or impair the development of the adjacent properties. The adequate supply of air and light would not be compromised as a result of this request. The request would not increase congestion in the streets, nor would it cause an obstruction to motorists on the adjacent streets. The proposal would not increase the danger of fire. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 7. The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are present in the neighborhood and are not unique to the property. The circumstances related to the variance request are unique to this property, including the location of the home relative to the setbacks, and the reconstruction of the adjacent 29th Avenue. Variance Case No, WA -16-171 Briano Staff finds that this criterion has not been met. 8. Granting of the variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities. This criterion does not apply to single-family homes. Staff finds this criterion is not an lip 'cable. 9. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual The Architectural and Site Design Manual does not apply to single and two family dwelling units. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. IV. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Having found the application in compliance with the majority of the review criteria, staff recommends APPROVAL of a 5 -foot (50%) variance from the 10 -foot side setback requirement for a corner lot to allow an addition to a single family residence on property located at 2895 Fenton Street and zoned Residential -One C (R-1 Q. Staff has found that there are unique circumstances attributed to this request that would warrant approval of a variance. Therefore, staff recommends approval for the following reasons: 1. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. 2. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare. 3. The request is consistent with the Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy and Comprehensive Plan policies to encourage upgrades and improvements to existing housing stock. With the following conditions: 1. The design of the addition shall be consistent with the application materials and provided exhibits, subject to staff review and approval through review of a building permit. Variance Case No. WA -16-171 Briano - 41h ea i i EXHIBIT 2: ZONING MAP Variance Case No. WA -16-17 /Briano EXHIBIT 3: Proposed 29th Avenue This exhibit shows the proposed roadway reconstruction adjacent to the subject property. The right-of- way/property line is shown in red. N 0 0 � I I � I I I 1 I I I I 1 I f I II II II I 11 Il Variance 8 Case No. WA -16-17 / Briano iI I��III 11 °II I I a, Variance 8 Case No. WA -16-17 / Briano iI I��III °II 1.1 I s, ,� >i11r� I�III e p:�a 11 I . l\ ' Y n I[` I:o � � I m g= Variance 8 Case No. WA -16-17 / Briano EXHIBIT 4: Proposed Addition Exhibit This exhibit overlays the proposed roadway reconstruction with an aerial to show how the addition will relate to the new sidewalk and curb. r.i 14� I PSI.,n All Variance v Variance 9 Case No. WA -16-17 /Briano EXHIBIT 5: Applicant Response Review Criteria: Variance A variance provides relief from the strict application of zoning standards in instances where a unique physical hardship is present. Per Section 26-115 of the Wheat Ridge Municipal Code, the reviewing authority (Community Development Director, Board of Adjustment, Planning Commission, or City Council) shall base its decision in consideration of the extent to which an applicant demonstrates that a majority of the following criteria have been met: 1. The property in question would not yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located. The property would yield a reasonable return in use and income if not granted the variance. 2. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. The granting of this variance would not alter the character of the locality 3. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property with this application, which would not be possible without the variance. This application represents a significant investment by the owners both in their residence but also in their community 4. The particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property results in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience. This variance would allow the owners to add room to their home while maintaining an adequate play area for the children they care for 5. If there is a particular or unique hardship, the alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. The difficulty is not created by the owner. 6. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located, by, among other things, substantially or permanently impairing the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or substantially diminishing or impairing property values within the neighborhood. Granting this variance would not be detrimental to any of the above mentioned. 7. The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are present in the neighborhood and are not unique to the property. yes. 8. Granting of the variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities. [Does not typically apply to single- or two-family homes.) not applicable 9. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual. [Does not typically apply to single- or two-family homes.] not applicable Community Development Department • (303) 235-2846 • www.ci.wheatndge.co.us Variance 10 Case No. WA -16-17 /Briano G Variance Case No. WA -16-17 /Briano EXHIBIT 6: Site Plan r'r'IA11rr%K1 OTmCCT _ - R." cn N CO 2 m z c m { EXHIBIT 7: Floor Plan 17— [0 04j FII L— Fw Tz- CO'-CR Call bd.. I dig, Variance 12 Case No. WA-16-171Briano Variance 13 Case No. WA-16-171 Briano Variance 14 Case No. WA-16-17 /Briano 1 4 . City Of `)`Theat �dge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 291h Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 LETTER NOTICE November 15, 2016 Dear Property Owner: This is to inform you of Case No. WA -16-17, a request for approval of a 5 -foot variance from the 10 -foot side yard setback resulting in a 5 -foot setback on property located at 2895 Fenton Street and zoned Residential -One C (R -IQ. The attached aerial photo identifies the location of the variance request. The applicant for this case is requesting a variance eligible for administrative review per section 26-115.0 of the Municipal Code to be granted by the Zoning Administrator without need for a public hearing. Prior to the rendering of a decision, all adjacent property owners are required to be notified of the request. If you have any questions, please contact the Planning Division at 303-235-2846 or if you would like to submit comments concerning this request, please do so in writing by 5:00 p.m. on November 28, 2016. Thank you. WA1617.doc www.ci.wheatridge.co.us BANK JESSE A JACOBSON ERIN A DENVER UNION WATER BOARD HAMBLIN MARILYN J 02890 GRAY ST 01600 W 12TH AVE 02886 GRAY ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80214 DENVER CO 80254 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80214 HOTHI DALJIT S GAS & FOOD MART LUNSFORD SCOTT LUNSFORD HEIDI MO FO PROPERTIES LLC 05795 W 29TH AVE 08414 PARFET CT 12122 VIEWPOINT DR WHEAT RIDGE CO 80214 ARVADA CO 80005 GOLDEN CO 80401 NOTE: Land use applications must be ► A submitted BY APPOINTMENT with a C1l}� C71 planner. Incomplete applications will not VAIX16 at Fidgc be accepted—refer to submittal checklists. LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION Community Development Department 7500 West 291h Avenue • Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 • Phone (303) 235-2846 (Please print or type all information) Applicant e < <<a/�b Phone 3'y7 -`� ail Address, City, Sta Zip t af rp Owner 1 G(Y•f 1 �cn0 Phone_ `�� J bmai 1 Address, City, te, Zip a�j �p� �✓-f • (��' 1� c'47 Contact/ hem Address, City, State, Zip (The person listed as contact \ _ public hearing signs, will receive a copy of the staff report prior to Public Hearing, and shall be responsible for forwarding all verbal and written communication to applicant and owner.) Location of request (address): ��w Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request): 71 Change of Zone or Zone Conditions O Special Use Permit 0 Subdivision — specify type: O Planned Development (ODP, SDP) O Conditional Use Permit O Administrative (up to 3 lots) O Planned Building Group 71 Site Plan 0 Minor (4 or 5 lots) O Temporary Use, Building, Sign O Concept Plan O Major (6 or more lots) Qd Variance/Waiver (from Section 26-%) 71 Right of Way Vacation O Other: Detailed description of request:, lJ" . �c I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above, without whose consent the requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners must submit power-of-attorney from the owner which approved of this action on his behalf. EDORENE LYONS PUBLIC Notarized Signature ofApplicant OLORADO State of Colorado t2a0�7590 ss xpires 0210812020 County of S� The foregoing i9stfument (Land Use Processing Application) was acknowledged by me this day of OCA& , 20 by My commission expires _:1/_L&/20 No ry ublic To be filled out by staff: Date received - / 41- I(e Comp Plan Design. Related Case No. Assessor's Parcel No. 39-2 Size (acres or sgft) T601 64 Rev 1/22/ 2016 Fee $ � 06. U Receipt No. C b IAO j-� _% Pre -App Mtg. Date Current Zoning Proposed Zoning Case No. WA-/ Quarter Section Map SE 2S Case Manager k 4 L,; C Current Use s; herd-�eO Proposed Use City Of wet Q#@ Sdwmb 2g( J& a%+ «Iwga L QkgS! +I Rq ZONING APPLICATION Rb 9a + ¥@aT+«IJD RqR gmQ1a REa -.�.. e,w aE k city Of W heat Rgge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Submittal Checklist: Variance Project Name:t Project Location: Rev. 5/2014 Application Contents: A variance provides relief from the strict application of zoning standards in instances where a unique physical hardship is present. The following items represent a complete variance application: Completed, notarized land use application form 2. Application fee 4. Signed submittal checklist (this document) 4. Proof of owne`rship—e.g. deed 5. Written authorization from property owner(s) if an agent acts on behalf of the owner(s) _6. Writtan request and description of the proposal Include a response to the variance review criteria—these are found in Section V6-115 of the municipal code nclude an explanation as to why alternate designs that may comply with the zoning standards are not feasible ✓ Include an explanation of the unique physical hardship that necessitates relief Surveyor Improvement Location Certificate (ILC) of the property VTo -scale site plan indicating existing and proposed building footprints and setbacks _9. Proposed building elevations indicating proposed heights, materials, and color scheme As applicant for this project, 1 hereby ensure that all of the above requirements have been included with this submittal. 1 fully understand that if any one of the items listed on this checklist has been excluded, the documents will NOT be distributed for City review. In addition, I understand that in the event any revisions need to be made after the second (2"d) full review, I will be subject to the applicable resubmittal fee. Signature: J2x- C� Date: If Name (please print):4/< V ��1 !`� /V d Phone: 3c2 ` �� T) _ q V Community Development Department - (303) 235-2846 - www.ci.wheatridge.co.us Rev. 512014 City of Wheat] COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT' Review Criteria: Variance A variance provides relief from the strict application of zoning standards in instances where a unique physical hardship is present. Per Section 26-115 of the Wheat Ridge Municipal Code, the reviewing authority (Community Development Director, Board of Adjustment, Planning Commission, or City Council) shall base its decision in consideration of the extent to which an applicant demonstrates that a majority of the following criteria have been met: 1. The property in question would not yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located. The property would yield a reasonable return in use and income if not granted the variance. 2. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. The granting of this variance would not alter the character of the locality 3. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property with this application, which would not be possible without the variance. This application represents a significant investment by the owners both in their residence but also in their community 4. The particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property results in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience. This variance would allow the owners to add room to their home while maintaining an adequate play area for the children they care for 5. If there is a particular or unique hardship, the alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. The difficulty is not created by the owner. 6. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located, by, among other things, substantially or permanently impairing the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or substantially diminishing or impairing property values within the neighborhood. Granting this variance would not be detrimental to any of the above mentioned. 7. The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are present in the neighborhood and are not unique to the property. yes. 8. Granting of the variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities. [Does not typically apply to single- or two-family homes.] not applicable 9. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual. [Does not typically apply to single- or two-family homes.] not applicable Community Development Department • (303) 235-2846 - www.ci.wheatridge.co.us EXHIBIT LOT 1, Mc INTIRE SUBDIVISION CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO W. 29TH AVENUE 135' ��D EXISTING STRUCTURE N 29.3' LOT 1 Ln LO 5.0 5.0' N O 29.4' 29.8' ------------ FENCE (TYP.) 150' I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I L vT L 1 { I ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I i I I I I 1 I I f I This exhibit does not represent a monumented survey. It is intended only to depict the attached graphic. rm • SCALE: 1"=30' DATE: 10.11.2016 SHEET 1 OF 1 C.C.S. CONSULTANTS, INC. 4860 Robb Street, Suite 206 2893 N. Monroe Ave Wheat Ridge, CO. 80033 Loveland, CO. 80538 Phone: 303.403.4706 Phone: 970.635.3031 Property appraisal system Page 1 of 1 JProperty Information GENERAL INFORMATION PIN/Schedule: 300021580 AIN/Parcel ID: 39-254-21-025 Status: Active Property Type: Residential Property Address: 02895 FENTON ST lOwner Name(s) WHEAT RIDGE CO 80214 IBRIANO JERRY Mailing Address: SAME ADDRESS AS PROPERTY Neighborhood: 2412 - LAKESIDE, STEWART GARDENS, OLINGER GARDENS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Subdivision Name: 509000 - MC INTIRE Block Lot Key Section ownshio Ran e QuarterSection Land S ft 10001 125 3 69 17601 otal 17601 Assessor Parcel Maps Associated with Schedule Interactive Mao ma39-254. df PROPERTYINVENTORY Property Type RESID Year Built: 1951 Adjusted Year Built: 1954 Design: Ranch Improvement Number: 1 -V Item Quality [No.1 Sale Amount Deed Type Areas Quality Construction Sgft 09-23-1982 MAIN BEDROOM2 FIRST FLOOR Average C 1875 FULL BATH Avera e 1 COVERED PORCH Avera 1234 EVAP COOLER 1 DETACH GARAGE Average C 1704 Land Characteristics Reta i I SALE HISTORY Sale Date Sale Amount Deed Type Reception 09-23-1982 0 Other 82066680 12-22-1986 70,000 Warranty Deed - Joint Tenancy 86159509 03-25-2011 0 Death Certificate 2011031011 07-11-2011 149,000 Warranty Deed 2011064378 TAX INFORMATION 2016 Pa able 2017 2016 2016 Mill Levy Information Actual Value Total 223,560 County Assessed Value Total 17,796 2015 Payable 2016 TB REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DIST Actual Value Total 223,560 URBAN DRAINAGE&FLOOD C SO PLAT Assessed Value Tota 1 17,796 Treasurer Information View Mill Levy Detail For Year 2016 2016 Mill Levy Information Tax District 3139 County TB School TB WHEAT RIDGE TB REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DIST TBAI URBAN DRAINAGE&FLOOD CONT DIST TB URBAN DRAINAGE&FLOOD C SO PLAT TB WHEATRIDGE FIRE DIST TB WHEATRIDGE SAN DIST TB WHEATRIDGE WATER DIST TB Total TB 0 http://ats.jeffco.us/ats/displaygeneral.do?sch=021580 12/05/2016