Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
WZ-14-12
V 41 -I n' City Of "� �,7Vheat�dge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Memorandum TO: Case No. WZ-14-12 file FROM: Meredith Reckert DATE: June 29, 2016 SUBJECT: file closure Case No. WZ-14-12 was a request by Wells Fargo Bank for approval of an amendment to the recorded Final Development Plan for the property. This case has been closed as the project is not moving forward. Should the developer wish to resurrect the SDP amendment, a new application with fees will be required. City of _� Wheatldge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29`h Ave. November 12, 2014 Eric Chekal, Regency Centers 8480 E. Orchard Rd, Suite 6900 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 Dear Mr. Chekal Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 This letter is in regard to an application filed for approval of a Specific Development Plan (SDP) for property located at 3490 Youngfield Street. The application has been reviewed and the following are comments regarding the first submittal. SHEET 1 1. Modify this title to read as follows: "Applewood Village Shopping Center Planned Commercial Development, Amendment #10 Specific Development Plan A portion of the Lot 1 ................ This change should be made on all of the sheets 2. For reproduction purposes, modify the vicinity map to a black and white stick drawing 3. Add an Explanation of Amendment described existing conditions and proposed modification for drive-through. 4. Add a Character of Development statement indicating how the drive --through has common design schemes, architectural materials and landscaping 5. Add a Case History Box with the following case numbers:WZ-10-06,WZ-14-09,WZ-14-12 6. In the Owner's Certificate, modify the language to reference a Specific Development plan. 7. In the Owner's Certificate, designate who will be signing the document. 8. In the City Certification, modify the signature blocks to be consistent with the attached certification language page. 9. Add a recording block for the Jefferson County Clerk and Recorder's Office. 10. The Site Data Table should be modified to include landscaped and hard surfaced coverage for both the existing and new condition. 11. In the Site Data Table, correct the zoning to Planned Commercial Development. 12. In the Site Data Table, specifiy that 6300 sf is the existing square footage of the bank. 13. In the Site Data Table, add a square footage of the drive-through facility. 14. In the Site Data Table, modify the total square footage to include both the existing bank and drive- through. 15. In the Site Data Table, designate lot size as lease areas for the bank and drive-through. 16. Add the following note: Parking shall be consistent with Section 26-501 of the Wheat Ridge zoning and development code. 17. Add the following note: Site and building lighting shall be consistent with Section 26-503 of the Wheat Ridge zoning and development code. 18. Add the following note: Signage shall be consistent with Article VII of the Wheat Ridge zoning and development code unless modified a future specific development plan or a master sign plan. 19. Add the following note: Landscaping shall be consistent with Section 26-502 of the Wheat Ridge zoning and development code. SHEET TWO Remove this sheet from the plan set and renumber the pages accordingly. SHEET THREE 1. Retitle this page "Existing Conditions". 2. Show existing improvements to the north and east. 3. Show the existing building as being demolished. SHEET FOUR 1. Remove the vicinity map. 2. Remove the Owner's Certification and City Certification. 3. Label Youngfield Street. 4. Show existing improvements to the north and east. >. Are new trash dumpsters proposed? Please show location and proposed method of screening. SHEET FIVE 1. Remove the vicinity map. 2. Remove the Owner's Certification and City Certification. 3. Label Youngfield Street. 4. Show existing improvements to the north and east. SHEET SIX 1. Designate elevations per view perspective - west, east, not side and front. 2. Add the two other elevation views for the structure's sides. 3. Is signage allowed on any of the elevations? If so, designate location and size. 4. Remove the Owner's Certification and City Certification. SHEET SEVEN 1. Remove the Owner's Certification and City Certification. 2. The footcandle readings under the canopy are too high and must be reduced. Address reduced security lighting standards after hours. SHEET EIGHT 1. Please clarify the total lease area and the amount of landscaped coverage required. 2. Include a calculation of live landscaping versus hardscape with square footage and percent of total. SHEET NINE No changes. SHEET TEN No changes. OTHER ITEMS 1. For publication purposes, please email a boundary lease line description approved by Public Works in Word format to mreckertgci.wheatridge.co.us. Attached are referrals received from other city departments and outside agencies regarding the Specific Development Plan document. Northwest Lakewood Sanitation District. See attached letter from Bill Willis dated September 24, 2014. Westridge Sanitation District. See comments from Kim Dahlin dated October 31, 2014. Wheat Ridge Fire Protection District. See attached letter from Kelly Brooks dated October 1, 2014. Wheat Ridge Police Department. See attached memo from Kevin Armstrong dated September 29, 2014. Wheat Ridge Public Works: See attached letter from Dave Brossman dated October, -K, 2014. See additional comments from Steve Durian dated November 7, 2014. Z� Xcel Energy: See attached letter from Donna George dated October 1, 2014. Additional referral comments may be forthcoming and will be forwarded. This concludes the summary of comments. Please address each of these comments by revising the drawings accordingly. For clarification on any of these issues, please feel free to contact any of the Development Review committee members: Community Development Meredith Reckert 303-235-2848 Public Works Dave Brossman 303-235-2864 Traffic Engineering Mark Westberg 303-235-2863 Please submit one 24" x 36" copy and one 11" x 14" copy of the revised documents. Include an electronic copy with a PDF document and an AutoCAD dwg (2010 or older) including all external reference and shx files, etc. If you have any questions or need further clarification, do not hesitate to contact me at 303-235-2848. Sincerely, Meredith Reckert, AICP Senior Planner 0 CM , -- (b - -2- ( - ('-i Specific Development Plan Required Cover Sheet Items OWNER'S CERTIFICATE The below signed owner(s), or legally designated agent(s) thereof, do hereby agree that the property legally described hereon will be developed as a Planned Development in accordance with the uses, restrictions and conditions contained in this plan, and as may otherwise be required by law. I (we) further recognize that the approval of this specific development plan, does not create a vested property right. Vested property rights may only arise and accrue pursuant to the provisions of Section 26-121 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws. [Insert name of owner(s) or agent(s) who will sign] State of Colorado ) ) SS County of Jefferson ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , A.D. 20_ by Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I, do hereby certify that the survey of the boundary of (development plan name) was made by me or under my direct supervision and to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, in accordance with all applicable Colorado statutes, current revised edition as amended, the accompanying plan accurately represents said survey. (Surveyor's Seal) Signature Rev. 5/2014 COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDERS CERTIFICATE State of Colorado ) ) SS County of Jefferson ) I hereby certify that this plan was filed in the office of the County Clerk and Recorder of Jefferson County at Golden, Colorado, at o'clock M. on the day of A. D., in Book , Page Reception No. JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER By: Deputy The appropriate language for the following two certifications will be based on whether the SDP is submitted concurrent with or subsequent to an approved ODP. Please confer with your staff planner. PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION [Recommended for approval / Approved] this day of , by the Wheat Ridge Planning Commission. Chairperson CITY CERTIFICATION Approved this day of by the [City of Wheat Ridge / Wheat Ridge City Council]. ATTEST City Clerk Mayor Community Development Director Community Development Department - (303) 235-2846 - www.ci.wheatridge.co.us �m A LU W loww8 WS sg�O w g i o o s coE 04LUO 5 � E E� f ��: k� �;■ qh�€ yip y7.��iFiik PER -ffsa� 4F s e - s= ��i➢sib i ael 0 Mimi OR I 83 z O M w O W U) z JO 11L) z ui I ag JW U 0 a"x� LZ, LL z F a �OaF \ I z T = N Lu W O¢ W r' �� � ' 1dllll�lL/lUl _ • � oaz�� - t J JOW W W p=�� s .� ci W O z UCL L ci F "sl° W � z, R o y OaO J W W 0aa� zDCOLL Oz0 3 m 31 0 03's a MIT E E Mlz M F Lu pE <o _ ya3oo a® �d Z GooNd> �a T€ oa 8a5 wN`� E='Ed REI �g c j �aa$o -�sQ $� till-n-oll PH �a�Saa�aaa F o<°i "— we oz:so s�reoro� 6«p N!�•id wi.s�wwwr000 n•nuo� amen •�Na c•wwpev vn �eo-e�wa•+ao��o�e� •n.Mc� Z/1133HS 6h0'e0'f1'ON90F i13AOD nns*+oo �rvin3nansarvv� Od i0 i1vH38 3an1J311HJaV 3dbJSONVI 0 oavaoloD'aoaia 1e3Hm Sao �� �NIa33rv��N3 i �rvmN nd oa„° e m00011-1�d— J71 '6u►�lnsua� �u!od N QOOM3lddt/ °,a3dn 9989esz-cz NOUVa Vd3dd 1VNIEJI80 - cIzo -zI wzieZioe OD'Nol3uln NOI1dIL'OS30 31V0 A3Aaf1S311114NV1 WSOV/VIIV arvnlo-3av�aa '3nVONVlmod' M9SL9 �- og = $ of i a � �$� a 3 '°3 oa ag'¢ - ;off oa ° ig a=5 sc orato ip e s° ovo moa oo WF =„ Z E E o =mss a o= _'g Wg€1lIIIIo N Z O7< W3 a =goow °€z o� ��s�a Q � ° o02 _W$i SS$°i°zoo w > xaxs �� N ry�k m�E 8 a of�¢ e o p�Y P w6 a ?g� <s o f€e.y-Y€?�....� wOQ� �ZUCLLL- LU w w U 0 > U - Z w LL -0 E (/� w w W 00:�LUuj LL- 'OQ t;Efa QV w O w Q Z w • o,a6 Z j w o gig °�w ises j 3o Q = ,,wr^y �rFF z CL LLJ Q Q Z O LL. s g s s 0a 0 s € 8 s sry € Q N Z Q a m LL LL LLm = LLEz o °m U w o~ o a Qst IF oe a o3s€°s F_ ewe W€a y.s e sf ass 3 s s� a� e f °� dog €6 QU �g w W_ a� =ado 00 f oyo° P Ws. tly 3g�m - � Z/Z 133HS 6C080'f l'ON 9Of dVW �rvu3nans arvvi OO VNOIOJ'3901i11V3HM 9rvia33wOrv3 I —rvrvv,n y at wo >III>d J71 '6u►i►nsusJ ju.►od (IOOMIIddb 9�9�Z NOI1V21Vd3bd lVN101bO - £IZO'ZI 9ZI09 0 3 'NO13lllN NOIIJ18DS30 31VQ A;Aans 33L10Nb'I WS3V/V1lV ' 3AVONVIMO2 'M 9929 lom t � 09 z 0 V) ,z( 0 Q > r) F)Q co N1LU ZD 0 �z0 J � 7- IL LJJ LU LU UNZw �C�0�Q zV) V) CL W = N LU z O c/) Lu��v F—LL. LLJ C) _ r� z< 1i1 o w z-Ow1� Q>w30 �o3�z o�w=) (/)3 ()o UJOQU CL- LL � LU CU 2 J r z ZD Cl� Q 0 � to Q LU LL- 0�=3 Z N Z LL - 0 z 0 �U �ii,enaotl 1S 0131ADNno k Nf'n[fw��[av — — AMYYJ9 �I II �8=sr n W i I'Ili a I �s Ho M p nod' I y9$oe 8 p — � I Eo I 8 �ii,enaotl 1S 0131ADNno k Nf'n[fw��[av — — AMYYJ9 �I he 5 Y w chi Q Q yF O w m o 8 < a y H� va O co m & I z `� H ,86'56 M„Lb,bT,00S � I Hal ”c ;1M,5;;f Y . x s i € R: dial stIIit11,i 33 tl& ` FF��: 'HIM, ry tl i a��pg84p i -- }y 11q''C�l .58595€otl � YY� l _P�4•g`�?4 lit- e�tg$j,�L i. 71, _ •j q ® i _• a iD U 1cc z N cc g �I o y=w.o �� Z l N U d 0 W N 2e l ga��o aOQWN I y go101 a -T11 � "it i'' it) I w\� 0 N LL N 1 N W O co O O H W O Q 100: OZ ZU tV �� j _ - —--_ � a � ui in ! ~tea a,, oo0� z �— o w - 3u— Z fy W l`a OyZO g 31� 01 a FU l l W9® _ > (D l 0Z loo�< Z Y >< o b9: ,LT'86 3„Lb,bTe00N ”— weor:oo e/rearol wa H:�,,.id.nsr.uwunnoa pa+n�sown •..a w�+ww ,,eo-e1wc.,.w�oa.d nwme� } o o g m vyyy p W WU i ky O > o f W l p g LOQLLI ly I I i ct Ed I I I Z 0 .86'S6 M„Lb.t I.00S y s' m �o ru) 0gpg �wao Z ' w ly I I i ct Ed I I I Z 0 m �o ru) 0gpg �wao Z ' w Z U 0KQ ZZ�LL� � a O¢wvOi € W ���� �s FwWLLLL v�g0 0L-� W > 0 0 oz 80 2FYO IL < SOW w�ug O aa3 z 0'- N LL Oyz0 0 O d HU € 3� N 00 N N Ln a, oo z .Li'86 3„Lt.t T.00N "o Nd 29:00 tl/dM �P'N!�eld oP$\nYYIY PWW mdn OA. p POWA*IddV dM La LWPab GM.d aIWM\:`J om �N A V) • w c°� � y . � � �°° �' F OO u � s e R F �N 3 S e5 € iia E ,i olt Ee1��;a13 a � aal� E Sa CO usa N p i p Z w v N 10 m J aK�O z �qrc q¢ �Mz �u w - O�zow WW0 Z 9 rw> >.. 3at90 r-` o WaZ�wo Q °'wi c rc fnQ=�? ILXw$i,s f>nn s do<00g3 Z0m~NO AOB-BO ® '® _ o r v a a ---- - -------- 1 � I j e � 1 j I f � Z o i!E j� I i f I SEI P �E E i a _ 0 i..w. wa tt:ro r�reaou � H�°-�+.ia w�snww,�° u.n� srn.n ww w...ww vn uuosuwu.�.ror°v.a.u.me° zo p. `y"n aeW gg �w: E s c0 Q J G y ;:. Z � s Yo U s J a W ggtE mF° ied"1-40-41 W MW VLMMld^P'O LLCM t°°4S°ek tltl51'N 4DWHEAT RIDGE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT DOING THE RIGHT THINGS AT THE RIGHT TIMES FOR THE RIGHT REASONS 3880 Upham Street Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 • ph.303.403.5900 • www.wrfire.org DIVISION OF FIRE PREVENTION November 3, 2014 Meredith Reckert City of Wheat Ridge Community Development 7500 West 29th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 RE: Community Development Referral CASE No.: WZ-14-12/Wells Fargo Bank The Wheat Ridge Fire Protection District has reviewed the Community Development Referral and has no requirements or concerns regarding our ability to serve this property. The applicant should be made aware that the proposed project may require one or more of the following Fire Department permits: o Fire District building permit It is the responsibility of the property owner/tenant to verify that all required Fire Department permits are acquired. Please feel free to contact me if there are any questions or concerns with respect to this review. Reviewed by, Kelly Brooks Fire Marshal Wheat Ridge Fire Protection District CCCONSOLIDATED mutual water October 21, 2014 City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Ms. Meredith Reckert 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Re: Case Number WZ-14-12 — Wells Fargo Sank — 3490 Youngfie/d Street Dear Ms. Reckert: This will acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated October 20, 2014, regarding the above referenced property. Please be advised that the above referenced property is in an area served by The Consolidated Mutual Water Company (Company.) Domestic water service may be provided to this property subject to compliance with the Company's rules, regulations and requirements for such service. Our records indicate that the property addressed as 3490 Youngfield Street is currently receiving domestic water from the Company through a 1 -inch meter (CMWCo Tap Number 17402/Account Number 01109877-01.) Domestic water service may continue to be provided to this property subject to compliance with the Company's rules, regulations and requirements for such service. The Company requires that a new application for water service be completed by the owner and returned to the Company at the time there is a change in use. The Company considers a remodel or building addition as a "change of use." The Company's rules, regulations, and requirements further state that each separate structure be served by a separate tap and meter, and in order to receive domestic water service, the property must also front a Company main. THE CONSOLIDATED MUTUAL WATER COMPANY 12700 West 27th Avenue • P.O. Box 150068 • Lakewood, Colorado 80215 Telephone (303)238-0451 • Fax (303)237-5560 City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Ms. Meredith Reckert October 21, 2014 Page 2 of 2 Fire protection requirements should be obtained from Wheat Ridge Fire Protection District and those requirements forwarded to this office by the Fire District at the earliest possible time. We can then determine if additional system improvements would be required to meet the demands set forth by the Fire District. If you should have any questions or comments regarding this correspondence, please contact this office. Sincerely, Andy Rogers Project Engineer CC'. Kelly Brooks, Fire Marshall, Wheat Ridge Fire District Michael E. Queen, CMWCo President Zach Queen, CMWCo Superintendent of Distribution Kim Medina, CMWCo Tap Administrator XcelEnergysm PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY November 4, 2014 City of Wheat Ridge Community Development 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Attn: Meredith Reckert Re: Wells Fargo Bank, Case # WZ-14-12 Right of Way & Permits 1123 West 3rd Avenue Denver, Colorado 80223 Telephone: 303.571.3306 Facsimile: 303. 571.3660 donna.1.george@xcelenergy.com Public Service Company of Colorado (PSCo) has reviewed the development plans for Wells Fargo Bank. Please be aware PSCo owns and operates existing electric distribution facilities within the subject property. The property owner/developer/contractor must contact the Builder's Call Line at 1-800-628-2121 and complete the application process for any new natural gas or electric service, or modification to existing facilities. It is then the responsibility of the developer to contact the Designer assigned to the project for approval of design details. The property owner/developer/contractor must also continue working with Frank Grady, Right -of -Way Agent at 303-425-3874 on the outstanding easement issue. Additional easements may need to be acquired by separate document for new facilities. As a safety precaution, PSCo would like to remind the developer to call the Utility Notification Center at 1-800-922-1987 to have all utilities located prior to any construction. If you have any questions about this referral response, please contact me at (303) 571- 3306. Donna George Contract Right of Way Referral Processor Public Service Company of Colorado City of Wheat jZ�iqgc PUBLIC WORKS Memorandum TO: Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner FROM: Dave Brossman, Development Review Engineer DATE: October 29, 2014 SUBJECT: WZ-14-12/Wells Fargo Bank I have completed my review for the request Planned Commercial Development Specific Development Plan approval for the construction of a drive-through banking facility for the Wells Fargo Bank in the Applewood Village Shopping Center at 3490 Youngfield Street, received on October 21, 2014, and I have the following comments: PLANNING & ZONING Specific Development Plan: General Comment: 1. In the Legal Description the site is described as being two parcels. Since this is not truly the case (the Leasehold is not a separate parcel), both of the words "PARCEL A" and "PARCEL B" should be removed, and the words "AND" added to for the Non -Exclusive Easement that is included with the leasehold. (Refer to the redlined Plan as necessary). Sheet A I (Motor Bank Site Plan): I . Please be advised that this project is going to disturb an area greater than 10,000 ft2 and therefore shall comply with the City's Site Drainage Requirements (SDRs). The SDRs require that full flood attenuation detention with water quality be incorporated into the site design. The site is quite constrained, but the City does accept alternative designs from the standard above -ground extended detention basin. Such alternatives are an underground detention facility, or permeable interlocking concrete pavers (PICPs) with underground infiltration basin (if the underlying soils are accommodative and the water table is deep). 2. While the SDRs state that the volume "for the entire site" must be accounted for, since this project is actually a part of the entire Applewood Village Shopping Center parcel. As such, it is unreasonable in this instance to ask that the entirety of the Shopping Center be accounted for, so just the limits of the area of disturbance (the "Project") will be considered the entire site from a detention/WQ perspective. Wells Fargo SDP 3490 Youngfield_Review-Ldoex Public Works Engineering October 29, 2014 Page 2 CIVIL ENGINEERING Drainage Letter: 1. While their analysis shows the site will actually decrease the overall impervious area, the City of Wheat Ridge Site Drainage Requirements (SDRs) states that if a project proposes to disturb the existing imperviousness by 10,000 square feet or more, the project falls into the Major Redevelopment category. 2. Major Re -Developments shall meet the full 100 -year flood attenuation stormwater detention and water quality volume requirements for the entire site, in this case for the entire area of redevelopment of 0.44 acres (not for the entire Applewood Shopping Center). a. For an above -ground, standard Extended Detention Basin (EDB) design, full flood attenuation and WQCV detention volume equal to 100% of the 100 year event + 50% WQCV is required. b. A preferred alternative to this type of design is by use of Full Spectrum Detention which utilizes Excess Urban Runoff Volume (EURV) per the Urban Drainage and Flood Control (UDFCD) criteria (l 00 -year + EURV). c. The City also supports alternative methods of stormwater detention and water quality, such as permeable interlocking concrete pavers (PICP) with infiltration basin, or underground detention incorporating an upstream proprietary WQ device such as a Rinker Stormceptor® or Contech CDS®. The volume for a PICP or underground system will be for the 100 -year only (no WQCV required). 3. A Final Drainage Report following the outline in the SDRs shall be required with this project. a. They will need to break down the site for just the redevelopment only. If they wish to leave it as currently defined in the Letter they will (unnecessarily) have to include the 6300 ft2 for the existing bank building in their detention/WQ calculations. b. If a PICP/infiltration basin design is to be used, then percolation test data must be included in the FDR. c. if any proprietary WQ devices are to be utilized, field data results demonstrating that the proposed device(s) will release effluent of 30mg/L of total suspended solids (TSS) or less as recommended by the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District. 4. Storm sewer is available in the proximity of this development to discharge into at the UDFCD maximum release rates. The existing storm sewer system may need to be analyzed to ensure capacity. Trip Generation Study: 1. Mark Westberg, P.E. (303.235.2863) will be reviewing the Trip Generation Study along with the Specific Development Plan, and his comments will be returned at a later date under separate cover. Wells Fargo SDP_3490 YoungSeld_Review- l.docx Re: Wells Fargo Drive -Thu Redevelopment Drainage Letter The intent of this Letter to provide drainage analysis for the development of a Portion of Lot 1, Applewood Village Shopping Center Subdivision adjacent to Youngfield Street within the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado. Following is a brief summary of the proposed development. Project Description The existing site consists of a ±6,300 SF Wells Fargo building and a portion of a ±10,150 SF retail building with associated hardscape and landscape improvements. Proposed redevelopment of the site will consist of a standalone drive -up at the existing Wells Fargo building. The site will consist of an approximate 0.39 acre area which encompasses six proposed drive through lanes and canopy. The total disturbed area associated with the redevelopment is 0.44 acres. Runoff associated with the redeveloped site will generally follow existing drainage patterns to the adjacent parking lot and existing stormwater facilities downstream of the Site. Site Characteristics Site runoff characteristics were evaluated with respect to composite site imperviousness for comparison of existing and proposed development as follows. Runoff characteristics associated with the existing site were identified based upon available survey as identified below: Existing Area Isfl Basin % Roof Please be advised that a stormwater Kimley>>)Horn detention facility with water quality must be incorporated into this design. The runoff Landscape volume for the Sub -Basins shown on the 14.4% Drainage Plan must be used in the Pavement calculations for the facility, and a Final 47.5% Drainage Report following the required OUTLINE shall be included with the next October 9, 2014 submittal. Refer to the City's Site Drainage Bill La Row Requirements found on the City's website City of Wheat Ridge (under Public Works/Development Review) 7500 West 29`h Ave Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Re: Wells Fargo Drive -Thu Redevelopment Drainage Letter The intent of this Letter to provide drainage analysis for the development of a Portion of Lot 1, Applewood Village Shopping Center Subdivision adjacent to Youngfield Street within the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado. Following is a brief summary of the proposed development. Project Description The existing site consists of a ±6,300 SF Wells Fargo building and a portion of a ±10,150 SF retail building with associated hardscape and landscape improvements. Proposed redevelopment of the site will consist of a standalone drive -up at the existing Wells Fargo building. The site will consist of an approximate 0.39 acre area which encompasses six proposed drive through lanes and canopy. The total disturbed area associated with the redevelopment is 0.44 acres. Runoff associated with the redeveloped site will generally follow existing drainage patterns to the adjacent parking lot and existing stormwater facilities downstream of the Site. Site Characteristics Site runoff characteristics were evaluated with respect to composite site imperviousness for comparison of existing and proposed development as follows. Runoff characteristics associated with the existing site were identified based upon available survey as identified below: Existing Area Isfl Basin % Roof 7369 38.2% 90% Landscape 2780 14.4% 0% Pavement 9166 47.5% 100% 19315 100% 82% 1.63 3.52 The Rational Method was used to estimate the peak flow rates. For the existing site, the 5 -yr and 100 -yr event anticipated runoff values are approximately 1.63 and 3.52 cfs, respectively. ■ TEL 303 228 2300 ■ Suite 200 990 South Broadway Denver, Colorado 80209 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PUBLIC WORKS DATE 10/21/2114 RECEIVED 10/21/2014 1st Submittal Kimley»>Horn Runoff characteristics associated with the proposed Wells Fargo drive -up were identified based upon the proposed site layout as identified bellow: Proposed Area (sf) Basin % I Q5 Qioo Roof 2625 13.6% 90% Landscape 3621 18.7% 0% Pavement 13069 67.7% 100% 19315 100% 80% 1.64 3.57 For the proposed redevelopment, the 5 -yr and 100 -yr event anticipated runoff values are approximately 1.64 and 3.57 cfs, respectively. As identified above, the proposed Site results in an overall reduction of 2% within the overall composite site imperviousness, a 0.01 increase in the 5 -yr storm event and a 0.05 cfs increase in the 100 -yr storm event, both of which are negligible amounts. Water Quality & Stormwater Detention Based on a disturbed area of 0.44 acres, it is not anticipated that the Wells Fargo redevelopment will require water quality or stormwater detention. Conclusion Based upon the information presented herein, it is our conclusion that redevelopment of the Site will not result in adverse impacts to existing stormwater infrastructure to which it discharges. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 303.228.2300 or dennis.sobieski@kimley-horo.com. Sincerely, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dennis Sobieski Attachments: Drainage Plan Existing / Proposed Runoff Calculations r 5u,3a a aoa-ezz �aoz� i. s o,o�,e a��as oas a ��6�3fAe a3a�3u Nb'ld 30b'NlHild assn aNe NaoHu:3,wH b o o ao;�o3o,s .a ON— 'oul'solepossy Pula Ntld 1N3WdOl3/34 311S z,a,o MOWN UM� ODUVA S'I'IHM 0 abo ---------------•-------------� 1--------- 1 -- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ice/ 1 z �1 Z O A- 1 0 i— 1 z Fs E Pam 1 a; e 8 3 14 L, E �I� 1 Q Q 1 MZMWI Q , S�Fu`l3 ---------------•-------------� 1--------- 1 -- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ice/ 1 z �1 Z O A- 1 0 i— 1 �r 1 a; / T L, 1 1 �I� 1 Q Q 1 MZMWI C ~ , no i 1 � � 1 I 111 i� 1 j 11 1 1' 1 1 -- l �r 1 �.s 1 1 L, 1 1 1 no I Z Y U f C]� X 71 j Proposed Wells Fargo Proposed Area (sf) Basin % 1 Q5 Qioo Cs Cioo Roof 2625 13.6% 90% 0.75 0.83 Landscape 3621 18.7% 0% 0.15 0.50 Pavement 13069 67.7% 100% 0.90 0.96 19315 100% 80% 1.64 3.57 0.74 0.86 Existing Site Existing Area (sf) Basin % I Q5 Qoo Cs Cioo Roof 7369 38.2% 90% 0.75 0.83 Landscape 2780 14.4% 0% 0.15 0.50 Pavement 9166 47.5% 100% 0.90 0.96 19315 100% 82% 1.63 3.52 0.73 0.84 K:\DEN_Civil\096351000_Applewood Wells Fargo\_Project Files\Eng\Drainage\2014-1006 Wells Fargo Drainage Analysis.xls Proposed Wells Fargo 5 -Year Design Storm Runoff Calculations (Rational Method Procedure) BASIN INFORMATION DIRECT RUNOFF DRAIN AREA RUNOFF T(c) C x AI BASIN ac. COEFF min in/hr Q cfs Proposed 0.44 0.74 5.0 0.33 5.00 1.64 Net Runoff: 1.6 100 -Year Design Storm Runoff Calculations (Rational Method Procedure) BASIN INFORMATION DIRECT RUNOFF DRAIN AREA RUNOFF BASIN ac. COEFF T(c) C x A I Q min I in/hr cfs Proposed 0.44 0.86 5.0 0.38 1 9.40 3.57 Net Runoff: 3.6 Note: 1. Intensity value (1) utilized as approved within the Master Drainage Report. 2. Time of Concentration value (T(c)) utilized as approved within the Master Drainage Report. K:\DEN_0vil\096351000_Applewood Wells Fargo�_Project Files\Eng\Drainage\2014-1006 Wells Fargo Drainage Analysis.xls Existing Wells Forgo 5 -Year Design Storm Runoff Calculations (Rational Method Procedure) BASIN INFORMATION DIRECT RUNOFF DRAIN AREA RUNOFF BASIN ac. COEFF T(c) C x AI Q min in/hr cfs Existing 0.44 0.73 5.0 0.33 5.00 1.63 Net Runoff: 1.6 100 -Year Design Storm Runoff Calculations (Rational Method Procedure) BASIN INFORMATION DIRECT RUNOFF DRAIN AREA RUNOFF BASIN ac. COEFF T(c) C x AI min in/hr Q cfs Existing 0.44 0.84 5.0 0.37 9.40 3.52 Net Runoff: 3.5 Note: 1. Intensity value (1) utilized as approved within the Master Drainage Report. 2. Time of Concentration value (T(c)) utilized as approved within the Master Drainage Report. K:\DEN_Civil\096351000_Applewood Wells Fargo\_Project files\Eng\Drainage\2014-1006 Wells Fargo Drainage Analysis.xls N� n W LLJ LU ow c cn b 3 o Ks FYgF e 33y�g '=a ggtl t €# pag t jEy "yII"'g I$ jsq�y dsg5q9� = ��L e�GFF�Q�EF° •N ��€ g�3 ��R §Y i a�c �s3ryees �� �gii i�l� � � p �•Z ,. l$p8 4¢$�gdg ,�8�$ 555868k ego GYPS g i �I� 3an>yIy z O Z 5 CO LU 0 04 oz O � �FQU Z W U O � w ULL. Z, a c9oaF Za�`~°o 2o0F� aW°LLLL O QZOw J gO1-- W��WLL �" o W> 8: C±woz() E0z Li V a< Tu Zn - W -_zn Ix �-- N 0wU)w U- CL zFNLL OU)z0 0 a O FU =I — _b -- LLiL MOREN W11111111 111111/111! iwe°e wd ozso Vu6orol aMo'4�o-�aid wis�n�¢�ooa na'wa� gp�en >+eo uooeu�eay day deo-enoovoion�os�aj �ieM�:� R e� F j 3 C � so 3� `sem E V _ 0 5d W o og F o o < a iwe°e wd ozso Vu6orol aMo'4�o-�aid wis�n�¢�ooa na'wa� gp�en >+eo uooeu�eay day deo-enoovoion�os�aj �ieM�:� 670-60'EI -ON BOf 8d,VNl91a0 - NOI1dld0330 Z Q z > Qo 0 Q � N e 0 � z�0 LU O J z u U L W C� �L v 0 w U— ::D Z w t— V L w0cz\OO I = Q w cn _ QL F= U�-I�j 0 LL.� QlJ w O LL Q Z w Z i 0 V) Q Q w ol O �o� oz = w UQozU Q CL Z LLJ W Q JZ ry F Q 0 q Q FU Cn w LL- 0<�3 S Z ~ v> LL - 0 L0 "' z 0 0O U Q a3n0D 00 V80100 3001a 1V3HM QOOM3lddb A 5H ,$8 aF N°s o- �w .. oio� • •�_ - ...... V�s V, II N1-11 'JNI2H3NI'JN3 ONIIVNVId wgeeg z J77 'Suilinsuo:) lu!Od Nol�oaa � 9E (DD iS 9ZL adarvnla3av�ae �,� 00'Nd m9g1 -3� V ON VIMOa 'M 9SL9 3?Eo � mgQ3 8a i0ME �€ mp g Sa 0 C Fla= o pzv - 8 �� s°� cLLwWcww a8 a9m ���$eR P ns =�° oonoo Se TM o 8 +a� :$ w s6 o roo Q M �C c of i w of 3 �9 $ ga c a i �m - �, �a W3 e o apo 3a°_ 3F wz y°z a C$z � cry NO 7F `:g <o ggy E waW oaFa - Ua°?.s F��� Z/Z 133HS 6h0-80'£1 ON oor dHW �NIA3nans ONV1 � �Mo rvine Oa tldOl00'3`Jala 1H3HM . no ouvam 3an10311u�av 3dv�soNrl O - - - 4�Y-fl �I �NIa33N19N3 �NINNYId ludH 'Bu► nsue� uio QOOM3lddb '� w J71 �1 d Nouvavd3adlvwolao elzozl 9c89-eszOzL tJOI1dlazslo - 31V0 A3�afIS 3lL14N Vl WSOV/H1lV BZI� 00 'N013lll11 H' 'and aN VlMOa 'M 99L9 O •o w , p U' I � I I z 0 V) z0 Q r) N w 0 �z.0 LL, U �Ua_I- LL- ; Z z < 01 LU to oilI 11� b Ila .96*S6 M,.Lt73,LO0S F.F - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - 61,11! 4111 1411H ji U� zn z o la 9. 10 t=; i --T I' P. LZa5 L5, , 'o ow o 4J Co 10L O; a o owo Z 5 Loa Ln IL '<WX3�0 oo z b w 7 0 z 0 z u) 0 2 V5 z 3m 6 0 < w z D oo U >< m U VV 'vc, UM .LT'86 3,.Lt,.4T.00N "tttt Rd OV. VIMMI W 40—d -M Wdn.A,O —00V " A mmmm g _ rr 08 0 a w z O a a 3 g � k` H 86'56 M„LV,17I,005 47 T lit z 0 ao M H O �z� �no�o �FQU �wao w0, Z Z �'w U' n Z L C a 4~1 Da- - z a W o¢wy WWI, WLL, yozow go�� LLJ 5 w -, IL OwOzo a• a wz La a<==o ZDa 0w0� zD Z f y Z z O 0 O a:03 0 0 U Q ,L i. ifb .1„LV,VI,OON -.,..- .....--,o ..a. ... u✓ . uv�, I, .Q PoomeloPo jM."ll.pe, Oww.j-11- o ~ � ' G}� \.-/��)/ / ( - §;&.: 77 |! ! !, P °N / |\ \ �Q ` `. . ui � � q |1.. / § . mgg 0. E4 )k ( k$ | U) � � b § Z or Pa. |0 ¥'$ |, • | |fill •!| � [ [ - |`i ` !!m ® n � � b § Z or Pa. |0 ¥'$ � •� ) |fill W Qo � s N USJ ow - (� w x„ i ff v - Q - p d Z H g go � 3 � U Q � U w R R ava O a� U e gW� w a s a a a (n Z - . W OL/60/OL 6- -W LLI OE 2 z Z 1 181 F UR ee zsx 19 e 6 PHU ir U 9, Hp 91 -1 w, 26 82 RM From: Steven Durian Sent: Friday, November 07, 2014 11:21 AM To: Dave Brossman Cc: Steve Nguyen Subject: Regency Center Traffic Letters Dave, Here are my comments and thoughts about the traffic letters dated October 9th. Steve Durian October 9th — Wells Fargo Drive Through The trip generation assessment assumes that trips will be reduced from the existing uses being removed and additional trips will be added due to the addition of the drive-through. The change of the walk-in to a drive-in was calculated by reducing trips from the existing use and adding trips from the new use. Overall, it is estimated that there will be a small net decrease in AM trips largely due to the reduction trips caused by the removal of the Mexican restaurant. One question is weather this use was/is open during the morning peak. If this restaurant was not or is not operational during the AM peak period, the number of trips would increase by about 48 during the AM peak. The number of PM trips would increase due to the removal of the existing uses and the addition of the drive through bank. The increase in trips is estimated to be 16 per hour. Based on these estimates, this proposal is under the city's criteria for a full traffic impact study of 60 trips per peak hour. The intersection that is likely most impacted by this change in use would be the 170 on-ramp intersection with Youngsfield Road. It does not seem that a relatively small amount of traffic in the 16 to 48 vph range would have a significant impact on the operation of this intersection and therefore a further traffic impact study based on this change in use is not warranted. Meredith Reckert From: KimDahlin <kdahlin@westridgesan.comcastbiz.net> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 11:35 AM To: Meredith Reckert Subject: RE: Referral - Wells Fargo Dear Ms. Reckert: Regarding Case No. WZ-14-12, the Westridge Sanitation District has the following comments: As the planned improvements have no impact on the sanitary sewer system, we have no concerns. Thank you. Kim Dahlin Office Manager Westridge Sanitation District Phone 303-424-9467 / Fax 303-424-2628 kdahlin@westridgesan.comcastbiz.net From: Meredith Reckert [ma iIto: mreckert(aci.wheatridge.co. us] Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 9:54 AM To: KimDahlin Subject: Referral - Wells Fargo Dear Kim, The Wheat Ridge Community Development Department has received a request for approval of Specific Development Plan approval at 3490 Youngfield Street (Case No. WZ-14-12]). Please download the application documents from the City's FTP site using the following credentials. The file is located in the "Community Development" folder, and the file name is Wells Fargo Drive -Through. Access the site at: ftp://ftp.ci.wheatridge.co.us/outbox/ User name: cowrftp Password: cowrftp2012 Path: Community Development 4 Wells Fargo Drive -Through Comments are due by November 3, 2014; no response from you will constitute having no objections or concerns. Feel free to be in touch with any additional questions. Thank you, Meredith Please note you will need Adobe software to view the application submittals. The latest version of Adobe Reader can be downloaded here: http://get.adobe.com/reader/ Meredith Reckert, AICP Senior Planner 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Office Phone: 303-235-2848 MARTIN/MARTIN G 0 N S U 1F1;41 EN G ! N E Eli 4 October 21, 2014 Meredith Reckert City of Wheat Ridge Community Development 7500 West 29t1 Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Email: mreckert@ci.wheatridge.co.us Re: NWLSD — WZ-14-12 — Wells Fargo Bank Martin/Martin, Inc Project No.: 15700.C.01 Dear Ms. Reckert, On behalf of the Northwest Lakewood Sanitation District (NWLSD), Martin/Martin Inc., acting as the District Engineer, offers the following in response to the referenced referral dated October 20, 2014 concerning a specific development plan for the Wells Fargo bank located at 3490 Youngfield Street, The District has no issues with the proposed specific development plan. The subject lot at the property referenced above is completely within the boundary and service area of NWLSD. Treatment of sewage generated within the NWLSD is provided by the Metro Wastewater Reclamation District (Metro). NWLSD has a 12 -inch to 18 -inch diameter sanitary sewer transmission line running west to east along the southern part of the Applewood Village Shopping Center. Currently, parts of Applewood Village Shopping Center are serviced by a private mainline connecting to NWLSD's transmission line. It appears that the existing Wells Fargo bank is currently serviced by this private mainline. It appears that there is an existing service line from the one-story, un -occupied building to be demolished and built into the motor bank facility also connected to the private mainline. If the developer plans any future construction that includes plumbing modifications or water meter sizing changes due to future improvements/development, NWLSD will need to review the design plans for service modification. If a main extension is necessary NWLSD's District Engineer will provide the design per the Rules and Regulations and upon completion of a main extension agreement. All costs involved — reviews, extensions (if required), design, contract development, construction, observation and inspections — are the responsibility of the Owner/Developer. A copy of the District's rules and regulations are available upon request. Any questions regarding this document, please contact us at (303) 431-6100. Sincerely, Bill Willis, PE Cc: Peter Italiano—SDMSI, Inc. Tim Flynn—Collins, Cockrel, Cole MARTIN/MARTIN, INC. 12499 WEST COLFAXAVENUE LAKEWOOD, COLORADO 80215 IMAIN 303.431.6100 MARTINMARTIN.COM City of Wheats c COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Community Development 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 303.235.2846 Fax: 303.235.2857 Community Development Referral Form Date: October 20, 2014 Response Due: November 3, 2014 The Wheat Ridge Community Development Department has received an application for approval of a Planned Commercial Development Specific Development Plan approval for the construction of a drive-through banking facility for the Wells Fargo Bank in the Applewood Village Shopping Center at 3490 Youngfield Street. No response from you will constitute having no objections or concerns regarding this proposal. Case No.: WZ-14-12/Wells Fargo Bank Request: Approval of a Specific Development Plan for property located at 3490 Youngfield. to allow construction of a bank drive-through. Please respond to this request in writing regarding your ability to serve the property. Please specify any new infrastructure needed or improvements to existing infrastructure that will be required. Include any easements that will be essential to serve the property as a result of this development. Please detail the requirements for development in respect to your rules and regulations. If you need further clarification, contact the case manager. Case Manager: Meredith Reckert Voice: 303.235.2848 Fax: 303.235.2857 Email: mreckert@ci.wheatridge.co.us DISTRIBUTION: Water District (Consolidation Mutual) Xcel Energy Fire District (Wheat Ridge) Sanitation District (Northwest Lakewood) Wheat Ridge Police Sanitation District (Westridge) Wheat Ridge Building Division Wheat Ridge Public Works Renewal Wheat Ridge "The Carnation City" 3490 Youngfield "The Carnation City" Meredith Reckert From: Meredith Reckert Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 9:12 AM To: 'dillon.hall@kimley-horn.com' Cc: Kim Waggoner; EricChekal@RegencyCenters.com Subject: fees Hi, Dillon I just wanted to get back to you regarding the fees for the specific development plan submitted Isat Friday. Bsed on a .72 acre lease area, the fees would be $860 with a $120 reimbursement for public noticing for a total of $980. Let me know if you have any questions. Meredith Meredith Reckert, AICP Senior Planner 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Office Phone: 303-235-2848 FAX: 303-235-2857 www.ci.wheatridge.co.us City of -(, y y hci t .b i' C7AIMl1tJ1�4' I-Vt1(:wmiN1 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail contains business -confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, electronic storage or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, attaching the original message, and delete the original message from your computer, and any network to which your computer is connected. Thank you. Kimley> Horn October 9, 2014 Bill LaRow City of Wheat Ridge 7500 West 291h Ave Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Re: Wells Fargo Drive -Thu Redevelopment Drainage Letter The intent of this Letter to provide drainage analysis for the development of a Portion of Lot 1, Applewood Village Shopping Center Subdivision adjacent to Youngfield Street within the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado. Following is a brief summary of the proposed development. Project Description The existing site consists of a ±6,300 SF Wells Fargo building and a portion of a ±10,150 SF retail building with associated hardscape and landscape improvements. Proposed redevelopment of the site will consist of a standalone drive -up at the existing Wells Fargo building. The site will consist of an approximate 0.39 acre area which encompasses six proposed drive through lanes and canopy. The total disturbed area associated with the redevelopment is 0.44 acres. Runoff associated with the redeveloped site will generally follow existing drainage patterns to the adjacent parking lot and existing stormwater facilities downstream of the Site. Site Characteristics Site runoff characteristics were evaluated with respect to composite site imperviousness for comparison of existing and proposed development as follows. Runoff characteristics associated with the existing site were identified based upon available survey as identified below: Existing Area (sf) Basin % I Q5 Qoo Roof 7369 38.2% 90% Landscape 2780 14.4% 0% Pavement 9166 47.5% 100% 19315 100% 82% 1.63 3.52 The Rational Method was used to estimate the peak flow rates. For the existing site, the 5 -yr and 100 -yr event anticipated runoff values are approximately 1.63 and 3.52 cfs, respectively. ■ TEL 303 228 2300 ■ Suite 200 990 South Broadway Denver, Colorado 80209 Kimley)))Horn Runoff characteristics associated with the proposed Wells Fargo drive -up were identified based upon the proposed site layout as identified bellow: Proposed Area (sf) Basin % I Cts Q1oo Roof 2625 13.6% 90% Landscape 3621 18.7% 0% Pavement 13069 67.7% 100% 19315 100% 80% 1.64 3.57 For the proposed redevelopment, the 5 -yr and 100 -yr event anticipated runoff values are approximately 1.64 and 3.57 cfs, respectively. As identified above, the proposed Site results in an overall reduction of 2% within the overall composite site imperviousness, a 0.01 increase in the 5 -yr storm event and a 0.05 cfs increase in the 100 -yr storm event, both of which are negligible amounts. Water Quality & Stormwater Detention Based on a disturbed area of 0.44 acres, it is not anticipated that the Wells Fargo redevelopment will require water quality or stormwater detention. Conclusion Based upon the information presented herein, it is our conclusion that redevelopment of the Site will not result in adverse impacts to existing stormwater infrastructure to which it discharges. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 303.228.2300 or dennis.sobieski@kimley-horn.com. Sincerely, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dennis Sobieski Attachments: Drainage Plan Existing/ Proposed Runoff Calculations 27 1 28 1 29 1 30 1 31 1 32 )RAINAGE LEGEND ■ M M M = BASIN TRIBUTARY AREA E3 Z O i S 3 _ K O Z / O 4 I Cj r 0 o s n 1 � 1 c� N rW 1 ='ora 6 U) ? o 1 <oU O O ] c N T Q m O 1 Zo Q N Z c 6 u "O C C 2 w o U a — a o � ° N o• © W W 1 'o 1 ©1 „ EXISTING 1 STORY (� C) a Z 12 BRICK BUILDING l F- Q ,. W d ,3 CD 1 C 0Q 1 j ZQ 1a 1 a w 1 W Q Q 1 H 5 1 / ®� U) 16 n ..'. ,6 - 10 0 10 20 SCALE I N FEET ,9 j \ h owwha hbdm. w i w 20 CAboymf w O O U l N Q Proposed Wells Fargo Proposed Area (sf) Basin % I Qs Q100 C5 Cioo Roof 2625 13.6% 90% 0.75 0.83 Landscape 3621 18.7% 0% 0.15 0.50 Pavement 13069 67.7% 100% 0.90 0 96 19315 100% 80% 1.64 3.57 0.74 0.86 Existing Site Existing Area (sf) Basin % I Q5 Q100 Cs C1oo Roof 7369 38.2% 90% 0.75 0.83 Landscape 2780 14.4% 0% 0.15 0.50 Pavement 9166 47.5% 100% 0.90 0.96 19315 100% 82% 1.63 3.52 0.73 0.84 K:\DEN_Civil\096351000_Applewood Wells Fargo\_Project Files\Eng\Drainage\2014-1006 Wells Fargo Drainage Analysis.xls Proposed Wells Fargo 5 -Year Design Storm Runoff Calculations (Rational Method Procedural BASIN INFORMATION DIRECT RUNOFF DRAIN BASIN AREA ac. RUNOFF T(c) C x A I Q COEFF min in/hr cfs Proposed 0.44 0.74 5.0 0.33 5.00 1.64 Net Runoff: 1.6 100 -Year Design Storm Runoff Calculations (Rational Method Procedure) BASIN INFORMATION DIRECT RUNOFF DRAIN AREA RUNOFF BASIN ac. COEFF T(c) min C x A I Q in/hr cfs Proposed 0.44 0.86 5.0 0.38 1 9.40 3.57 Net Runoff: 3.6 Note: 1. Intensity value (1) utilized as approved within the Master Drainage Report. 2. Time of Concentration value (T(c)) utilized as approved within the Master Drainage Report. K:\DEN_Civil\096351000_Applewood Wells Fargo\_Project Files\Eng\Drainage\2014-1006 Wells Fargo Drainage Analysis.xls Existing Wells Fargo 5 -Year Design Storm Runoff Calculations (Ratlnnal Mathnrl Prn—riiirol BASIN INFORMATION DIRECT RUNOFF DRAIN AREA ERUNOFF T(c) CxA I Q BASIN ac. COEFF min in/hr cfs Existing 0.44 0.73 1 5.0 0.33 5.001.63 Net Runoff: 1.6 100 -Year Design Storm Runoff Calculations (Rational Method Procedure) BASIN INFORMATION DIRECT RUNOFF DRAIN AREA RUNOFF T(c) C x A I Q BASIN ac. COEFF min in/hr I cfs Existing 0.44 0.84 5.0 0.37 ---9-4o--T 3.52 Net Runoff: 3.5 Note: 1. Intensity value (1) utilized as approved within the Master Drainage Report. 2. Time of Concentration value (T(c)) utilized as approved within the Master Drainage Report. K:\DEN_Civil\096351000_Applewood Wells Fargo\_Project Files\Eng\Drainage\2014-1006 Wells Fargo Drainage Analysis.xls Kimley>>> Nora October 9, 2014 City of Wheat Ridge 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Attn: David F. Brossman Re: Applewood Village Redevelopment, Wheat Ridge, Colorado 3490 Youngfield Street Wells Fargo Drive Through Lanes Addition Trip Generation Comparison Letter Dear Mr. Brossman: The existing Wells Fargo within Applewood Village is proposing to add six (6) drive through lanes. Applewood Village is located on the east side of Youngfield Street between West 32nd Avenue and West 38th Avenue. The Wells Fargo is located at 3490 Youngfield Street in Wheat Ridge, Colorado. Presently the existing bank has no drive through facilities for ATM or teller access. Based on this, the purpose of this letter is to provide a trip generation calculation comparison for the existing Wells Fargo walk-in bank facility (without drive through lanes) and the proposed bank with the drive through lanes. Construction of the drive through lanes will remove an existing building that previously contained a Mexican restaurant and a paint store. The trip generation of these uses will be compared in the existing condition. The approximate 6,400 square foot Wells Fargo will remain in place and convert from a walk-in bank to a drive-in bank (serves drive-in and walk-in customers). To accommodate the drive-in portion of the bank, an approximate 5,100 square foot Mexican restaurant and 2,400 square foot paint store will be removed. For information, the approximate 2,000 square foot Caldwell Chiropractic building will remain in place to the south of the proposed drive through area. The on-site circulation of the proposed drive through facilities will operate similar to today's condition. It will likely actually improve onsite movements. Entrance into the drive through lanes will occur from the east. This entrance is located where existing surface parking spaces are located. Therefore, the parking will be removed. Since this entrance will be for entering traffic only, there will no longer be any backing maneuvers from the parking spaces that used to exist in this location. The exit from the drive through lanes will occur to the north along the main east/west drive aisle. This will be a standard traffic movement and is located far enough from the access. Operationally this movement is anticipated to work well. Further, the 90 degree parking along the drive aisle will be removed through this redeveloped section, which will improve circulation along the main drive aisle. The amount of queuing with the onsite drive through facility is anticipated to be adequate with the proposed project. Trip generation for the proposed uses is based on the ITE Trip Generation, 9th Edition (most current edition), Hardware/Paint Store (816), Walk-in Bank (911), Drive-in Bank (912), and High -Turnover (Sit-down) Restaurant (932). The following table summarizes the anticipated trip generation comparison for the existing Wells Fargo walk-in bank, Mexican restaurant, and paint store compared with the proposed redevelopment of a Wells Fargo drive-in bank without the Mexican restaurant and paint store (trip generation calculations are attached). Kimley)))Horn Trip Generation Comparison Applewood Village Wells Fargo Drive Through Redevelopment Mr. Brossman, October 9, 2014, Page 2 Use and Size Weekday Vehicle Trips AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out Total In Out Total Previous Development 6,400 SF Walk-in Wells Fargo 13* 13* 26* 34 44 78 5,100 SF Mexican Restaurant 30 25 55 30 20 50 2,400 SF Paint Shop 2 1 3 6 6 12 Total 45 39 84 70 70 140 Current Proposal 6,400 SF Drive-in Wells Faro 44 33 77 78 78 156 Net New Trips -1 -6 -7 +8 +8 +16 * Trip Generation is not provided in 9 th Edition; therefore, 7 1hEdition Rates were used. As summarized in the table, the current proposal of redeveloping the previous high turnover sit down restaurant and paint store to drive through lanes for the existing Wells Fargo drive-in bank within Applewood Village is anticipated to generate seven (7) fewer morning peak hour trips and 16 greater afternoon peak hour trips than the previous uses. This of course assumes that the Mexican restaurant was open for breakfast during the morning peak hour, which may not have been the case. But, this building could have potentially developed with a different high turnover sit down restaurant that may have serve breakfast as the same use. Therefore, we believe that this current development proposal of adding drive through facilities for the existing Wells Fargo bank is consistent with the trips previously generated. When considering Applewood Village entire trip generation, the slight increase in traffic during the afternoon peak hour will be insignificant compared to the overall retail center. Therefore we believe that no further traffic analysis will be required based on this proposal. If you have any questions or require anything further, please feel free to call me at (303) 228-2300. Sincerely, KIM�Y-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Curtis D. Rowe, P.E., PTOE Vice President 0• R , OA t 36355 10/9/14 o�Fss/ONAL �E�G\� Kimley>>> Horn Project Wells F Subject Tril Designed by _ Checked by D Applewood Village Redevelopment eneration for Walk -In Bank (Existing Wells Fargo Bank Matt Farmen Curtis Rowe Date October 08, 2014 Date October 08, 2014 TRIP GENERATION MANUAL TECHNIQUES ITE Trip Generation Manual 9th Edition, Average Rate Equations Land Use Code - Walk-in Bank (911) Job No. Sheet No. 1 of 1 Independant Variable - 1000 Square Feet Gross Floor Area (X) Gross Floor Area = 6,400 Square Feet X = 6.400 T = Average Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Hour of Adiacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. (Page 1672. 7th Edition) Average Weekday Directional Distribution: 50% ent. 50% exit. T = 4.07 (X) T = 26 Average Vehicle Trip Ends T = 4.07 6.400 13 entering 13 exiting 13 + 13 = 26 *Trip Generation for AM Peak Hour is not provided in 9th Edition; therefore, 7th Edition was used Peak_ Hour of Adiacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 D.m. (Daae 1834 Average Weekday Directional Distribution: 44% ent. 56% exit. T =12.13 (X) T = 78 Average Vehicle Trip Ends T = 12.13 * 6.400 34 entering 44 exiting 34 + 44 (*) = 78 Weekdav (Daae 1672. 7th Edition Average Weekday Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting T = 156.48 (X) T = 1002 Average Vehicle Trip Ends T = 156.48 * 6.400 501 entering 501 exiting 501 + 501 (*) = 1002 *Trip Generation for Weekday is not provided in 9th Edition; therefore, 7th Edition was used. Saturday Peak Hour of Generator (page 1672. 7th Edition) Average Saturday Directional Distribution: 50% ent. 50% exit. T = 4.81 (X) T = 31 Average Vehicle Trip Ends T = 4.81 * 6.400 15 entering 16 exiting 15 + 16 (*) = 31 *Trip Generation for Saturday is not provided in 9th Edition; therefore, 7th Edition was used Project Wells Fargo Applewood Village Redevelopment \i m ey >>> H orn Trip generation for High -Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant (Existing Mexican Restaurant) Designed by Matt Farmen Date October 08, 2014 Job No. 96060016 Checked by Curtis Rowe Date October 08, 2014 Sheet No. 1 of 1 TRIP GENERATION MANUAL TECHNIQUES ITE Trip Generation 9th Edition, Average Rate Equations Land Use Code - 932 High -Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant Independent Variable - 1,000 Sq Ft Number of Units (X) - 5.1 T = Trip Ends Peak Hour Adjacent Street Traffic One Hour Between 7 and 9 AM AM Peak Directional Distribution: T=(X)- 10.81 Trip Ends Per 1,000 Sq Ft 55% Entering 45% Exiting T = 55 Trip Ends 30 Entering 25 Exiting Peak Hour Adiacent Street Traffic One Hour Between 4 and 6 PM PM Peak Directional Distribution: T = (X) * 9.85 Trip Ends Per 1,000 Sq Ft 60% Entering 40% Exiting T = 50 Trip Ends 30 Entering 20 Exiting Weekday Daily Weekday T=(X)- 127.15 Trip Ends Per 1,000 Sq Ft T = 650 Trip Ends Non -Pass -By Trip Percentage AM 100% PM 57% Note: Rounding may occur in calculations Directional Distribution: 50% Entering 50% Exiting 325 Entering 325 Exiting Non -Pass -By Trip Volumes AM Peak 30 Entering PM Peak 17 Entering 25 Exiting 12 Exiting s5uz i np(3enriannerv9.xisx 10/8/2014 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 6:25 PM 2013 CQI, Jim West, Pleasanton, CA 1 Planner Sheet Project Wells Fargo Applewood Village Redevelopment i m I ey >>> H orn Trip generation for Hardware/Paint Store (Existing Paint Store) Designed by Matt Farmen Date October 08, 2014 Job No. 96060016 Checked by Curtis Rowe Date October 08, 2014 Sheet No. 1 of 1 TRIP GENERATION MANUAL TECHNIQUES ITE Trip Generation 9th Edition, Average Rate Equations Land Use Code - 816 Hardware/Paint Store Independent Variable - 1,000 Sq Ft Number of Units (X) - 2.4 T = Trip Ends Peak Hour Adjacent Street Traffic One Hour Between 7 and 9 AM AM Peak Directional Distribution: T=(X)- 1.08 Trip Ends Per 1,000 Sq Ft 0% Entering 0% Exiting T = 3 Trip Ends 0 Entering 0 Exiting Peak Hour Adjacent Street Traffic One Hour Between 4 and 6 PM PM Peak Directional Distribution: T = (X) * 4.84 Trip Ends Per 1,000 Sq Ft 47% Entering 53% Exiting T = 12 Trip Ends 6 Entering 6 Exiting Weekday Daily Weekday T (X) - 51.29 T = 124 Trip Ends Per 1,000 Sq Ft Trip Ends Non -Pass -By Trip Percentage AM 100% PM 74% Note: Rounding may occur in calculations Directional Distribution: 50% Entering 50% Exiting 62 Entering 62 Exiting Non -Pass -BV Trip Volumes AM Peak 0 Entering PM Peak 4 Entering 3 Exiting 5 Exiting 3502TripGenPlannerV9.xlsx 10/8/2014 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 6:26 PM 2013 CQI, Jim West, Pleasanton, CA 1 Planner Sheet Kimley>>> Horn Project Wells Fargo Applewood Village Redevelopment Subject Trip Generation for Drive -In Bank (Proposed Wells Fargo Bank) Designed by Matt Farmen Date October 08, 2014 Job No. 96060016 Checked by Curtis Rowe Date October 08, 2014 Sheet No. 1 of 1 TRIP GENERATION MANUAL TECHNIQUES ITE Trip Generation Manual 9th Edition, Average Rate Equations Land Use Code - Drive-in Bank (912) Independant Variable - 1000 Square Feet Gross Floor Area (X) Gross Floor Area = 6,400 Square Feet X = 6.400 T = Average Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. (Pape 1843) Average Weekday Directional Distribution: 57% ent. 43% exit. T = 12.08 (X) T = 77 Average Vehicle Trip Ends T = 12.08 " 6.400 44 entering 33 exiting 44 + 33 = 77 Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. (page 1844) Average Weekday Directional Distribution: 50% ent. 50% exit. T =24.30 (X) T = 156 Average Vehicle Trip Ends T = 24.30 ' 6.400 78 entering 78 exiting Weekday (page 1753) Average Weekday T = 148.15 (X) T = 148.15 ` 6.400 Saturday Peak Hour of Generator (page 1848) Average Saturday T = 26.31 (X) T = 26.31 * 6.400 78 + 78 = 156 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting T = 950 Average Vehicle Trip Ends 475 entering 475 exiting 475 + 475 (') = 950 Directional Distribution: 51% ent. 49% exit. T = 168 Average Vehicle Trip Ends 86 entering 82 exiting 86 (`) - 82 = 168 Non -Pass -by Trip Volumes (page 65. Trip Generation Handbook, June 2004) Weekday PM Pass -By Trip Percentage: 47% Applied All Other Time Periods IN Out Total AM Peak 23 18 41 PM Peak 41 41 82 Daily 252 252 504 Saturday Peak 46 43 90 00 rn w n H O O z SITE /DRIVE - UP PLAN UI PROJECT: 3490 YOUNGFIELD ST. WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 ARCHITECT/INTERIOR DESIGNER oo JS�GJD- • Ln 3311 Elm Street, Suite 105 Dallas, Texas 75226 r 214-742-6044 O 214-742-6041 Fax LnO O COPYRIGHT PROTECTED PROFESSIONAL'S SEAL: CONSULTANT: FULL SET ISSUE HISTORY: ISSUE FOR REVIEW SHEET DELTA REVISION: DRAWING INFO: FILE: SRe PI—dA g DRAWN BY: aageel CHECKED BY: JS SHEET NUMBER DRIVE - UP PLAN A1.03 Stewart titi D Madison Street, Suite 400 Denver, Colorado 80206 Phone: 303-331-0333 Date: April 3, 2014 File Number: 960875 -Revision No. 1 Property Address: Applewood Village Shopping Center, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 DISTRIBUTION LIST: Regency Centers Attn: Eric Chekal Email: ericchekal&re2encycenters.com ATTACHED PLEASE FIND THE FOLLOWING: Updated Information Only Title Commitment Point Consulting, LLC Attn: Cameron Watson Email: cwatson(?pnt-llc.com THIS REVISION INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING CHANGES: Schedule A: Amend Effective Date Amend vesting for Parcels J and K Schedule B-2: Add Exception 83 WHEN MAKING ESCROW INQUIRIES, PLEASE CONTACT: WHEN MAKING TITLE INQUIRIES, PLEASE CONTACT: Title Only Lynda Rosamond Phone: 303-780-4012 Email Address: lynda.rosamondAstewart.com ALTA Commitment (6/17/06) ALTA Commitment Form COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Issued by rt title guaranty company Stewart Title Guaranty Company, a Texas Corporation ("Company"), for a valuable consideration, commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the Proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges and compliance with the Requirements; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions of this Commitment. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the Proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A by the Company. All liability and obligation under this Commitment shall cease and terminate six months after the Effective Date or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue the policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. The Company will provide a sample of the policy form upon request. This commitment shall not be valid or binding until countersigned by a validating officer or authorized signatory. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Stewart Title Guaranty Company has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereunto affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A. Countersigned: AUthif nzed ountersignature Stewart Title 55 Madison Street, Suite 400 Denver, Colorado 80206 Phone: 303-331-0333 Estewart title guaranty company N 1-9 0 8 �o �_-_bre'zar•s����� Senior Chairman of the Board *CF,an of the Board File Number: 960875 -Revision No. 1 ALTA Commitment (6/17/06) COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A 1. Effective Date: March 31, 2014, at 5:30 PM File Number: 960875 -Revision No. I 2. Policy or Policies To Be Issued: Information Only Title Commitment 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is: Fee Simple 4. Title to the referenced estate or interest in said land is at the effective date hereof vested in: See Attached Vesting 5. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: See Attached Legal Description Purported Address: Statement of Charges: Applewood Village Shopping Center These charges are due and payable before a Policy can be issued: Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Commercial Rate: To Be Determined Commitment $500.00 Fee**: (Schedule Nos. 422294; 211468; 189701; 109900; 73632;422296;068217;109904;176823;211469; 214039 and 214036) ** Will be applied to premium if policy issued. SCHEDULE A TITLE VESTED IN U.S. Retail Partners, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, formerly known as BPP Retail, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as to Parcels A and B; U.S. Retail Partners, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as to Parcels G and H; Showme Mountain Investors, LLC, a Missouri limited liability company, as to Parcels C and D; Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, successor by merger and name changes of Goldenbank Applewood, a Colorado state banking corporation, as to Parcels E and F; ACO, Inc., a Colorado corporation, successor by merger of Metroland, Incorporated, a Colorado corporation, as to Parcel 1; U.S. Retail Partners, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as to Parcels J and K SCHEDULE A LEGAL DESCRIPTION Parcel A: Lot 1, APPLEWOOD VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER SUBDIVISION, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado EXCEPT that portion conveyed by Bargain and Sale Deed, recorded October 6, 2008, at Reception No. 2008093175. Parcel B: That part of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 29, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, described as: COMMENCING at the point of intersection of the East right-of-way of Youngfield Street and the South line of the Northwest quarter of Section 29, whence the West quarter corner of said Section bears South 89°31'42" West, 1382.42 feet and the Southwest corner of the Southeast quarter of said Northwest quarter bears South 89°31'42" West 60.00 feet; running thence North 00°51'48" West, parallel with the West line of said Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter and along the East right-of-way line of Youngfield Street, 180.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said East right-of-way line, North 00°51'48" West, 274.32 feet; thence leaving said East right-of-way line North 89°31'42" East, parallel to the South line of said Northwest quarter, 140.00 feet; thence North 00°51'48" West, parallel with said East right-of-way line, 175.68 feet; thence North 89°31'42" East, 150.00 feet; thence South 00°51'48" East, parallel with said East right-of- way line, 450.00 feet; thence South 89°31'42" West, parallel with the South line of said Northwest quarter, 290.00 feet, more or less, to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado PARCEL C: That part of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 29, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, described as follows: BEGINNING at a point 25 feet North of the South line of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 29, and 60 feet East of the West line of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 29; thence Easterly parallel to the South line of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 29, a distance of 150 feet; thence Northerly parallel to the West line of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 29, a distance of 175 feet; thence Westerly parallel to the South line of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 29, a distance of 150 feet; thence Southerly parallel to the West line of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 29, a distance of 175 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado PARCEL D: The South 25 feet of the East 150 feet of the West 210 feet of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 29, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado PARCEL E: A tract of land in the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 29, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Jefferson County Colorado, described as follows: BEGINNING at a point which is 60.00 feet East of the West line of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of said Section 29, and 454.32 feet North of the South line of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of said Section 29; thence North 89°31.2' East a distance of 140.00 feet; thence North 00°51.8' West a distance of 200.00 feet; thence South 89°31.2' West a distance of 140.00 feet; thence South 00°51.8' East a distance of 200.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; and, A tract of land in the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 29, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the 61, Principal Meridian, Jefferson County, Colorado, described as follows: BEGINNING at a point which is 60 feet East of the West line of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of said Section 29, and 530 feet North of the South line of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of said Section 29; thence North 00°51.8' West a distance of 124.32 feet; thence South 89°31.2' West a distance of 10 feet; thence South 00°51.8' East, a distance of 124.32 feet; thence North 89°31.2' East, a distance of 10 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado PARCEL F: Lots 23 and 24, Block 1, Applewood Village, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado EXCEPT the Northerly 5 feet of said Lots; and EXCEPTING that portion of Lots 23 and 24 conveyed to Longs Peak Metropolitan District by Special Warranty Deed recorded April 3, 2008 at Reception No. 2008031587. PARCEL G: Lot 2, Applewood Village Shopping Center Subdivision, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado PARCEL H: Lots 19 and 20, Block 1, Applewood Village, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado PARCEL L• The North 5 feet of Lots 23 and 24, Block 1, Applewood Village, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado PARCEL J: A tract or parcel of land No. A300 of the Department of Transportation, State of Colorado, Project No. M361-004 in the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 29, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, in Jefferson County, Colorado, said tract or parcel being more particularly described as follows: That portion of the South 530 feet of the West 610 feet of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 29, Township 3 South, Range 69 West, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, described as: BEGINNING at a point on the Northeast corner of the intersection of West 32nd Avenue and Youngfield Street, thence East along the North line of West 32nd Avenue, a distance of 140.00 feet; thence North at 89 degrees 37 minutes, a distance of 150.00 feet; thence West at 90 degrees 23 minutes, a distance of 140.00 feet; thence South at 89 degrees 27 minutes, a distance of 150.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING therefrom that portion conveyed to the City of Wheat Ridge by deed recorded February 15, 1990 at Reception No. 90013512. FURTHER EXCEPTING therefrom that portion conveyed to the City of Wheat Ridge, a home rule city of the State of Colorado by deed recorded October 26, 2011 at Reception No. 2011096812. PARCEL K: A tract or parcel of land No. A301 of the Department of Transportation, State of Colorado, Project No. M361-004 in the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 29, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, in Jefferson County, Colorado, said tract or parcel being more particularly described as follows: That part of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 29, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, described as follows: BEGINNING at a point 200 feet East of the West line of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 29, and 30 feet North of the South line of the Northwest quarter of said Section; thence North 0°51.8' West and parallel with the West line of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section, a distance of 150 feet; thence North 89° 31.2' East and parallel with the South line of the Northwest quarter of said Section, 150 feet; thence South 0° 51.8' East, a distance of 150 feet; thence South 89° 31.2' West 150 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING therefrom that portion conveyed to the City of Wheat Ridge, a home rule city of the State of Colorado by deed recorded October 26, 2011 at Reception No 2011096840. NOTE: Said Parcels J and K are also known as: A parcel of land situated in the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 29, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, in Jefferson County, Colorado, being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the Southwest corner of the said Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 29 from whence the center of Section 29 bears N 89 L1 31' 42" E, a distance of 1322.42 feet with all bearings herein relative thereto; Thence N 00° 51' 48" W along the West line of the said Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 29, a distance of 180.00 feet; Thence N 89° 31' 42" E, a distance of 60.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, said point being on the East right-of-way for Youngfield Street; Thence N 89° 31' 42" E, a distance of 289.91 feet to a point on the Westerly boundary of Lot 1, Applewood Village Shopping Center Subdivision recorded at Reception No. F0193712 in the office of the Clerk and Recorder for Jefferson County; Thence S 00° 51' 48" E along said West line, a distance of 121.00 feet to a point on the North right-of-way for W. 32nd Ave.; Thence the following two courses along said North right-of-way; S 89° 31' 42", a distance of 250.68 feet to a point of tangent curvature; Along the arc of a 39.50 foot radius curve to the right through an angle of 89° 36' 53", an are distance of 61.78 feet having a chord that bears N 45° 39' 51" W, a distance of 55.67 feet to a point on the said East right-of-way for Youngfield Street; Thence N 00° 51' 48" W along said right-of-way, a distance of 81.76 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; County of Jefferson, State of Colorado COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE B — Section 1 REQUIREMENTS File Number: 960875 -Revision No. 1 The following are the requirements to be complied with: Payment to or for the account of the grantor(s) or mortgagor(s) of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. 2. Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record. NOTE: This product is for informational purposes only. It is not a title insurance product and does not provide any form of coverage. This product is not a guarantee or assurance and does not warrant, or otherwise insure any condition, fact or circumstance. This product does not obligate this Company to issue any policies of title insurance for any subsequent transaction based on the information provided or involving the property described herein. The limit of liability of Stewart Title Company for any causes of action directly or indirectly related to the search service shall be, in the total amount, limited to the charge paid under this agreement, $500.00, or $2,000, whichever is greater. COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE B — Section 2 EXCEPTIONS File Number: 960875 -Revision No. 1 The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession, not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the land and not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof, but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this commitment. 6. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) minerals of whatsoever kind, subsurface and surface substances, in, on, under and that may be produced from the Land, together with all rights, privileges, and immunities relating thereto, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b) or (c) are shown by the Public Records or listed in Schedule B. 7. Water rights, claims or title to water. 8. Any and all unpaid taxes and assessments and any unredeemed tax sales. 9. Ditch and ditch rights as evidenced by Quit -Claim Deed recorded May 10, 1880 in Book 9 at Page 268. NOTE: The Company makes no representation as to the present ownership of any such interests. There may be leases, grants, exceptions or reservations of interests that are not listed. 10. Right -of -Way Agreement, with the City and County of Denver, recorded March 20, 1936, in Book 379 at Page 68. 11. Right of Way Agreement to the City and County of Denver acting by through and for the use of its Board of Water Commissioners recorded March 26, 1951, in Book 712 at Page 339. 12. Reservation of easement contained in Deed recorded March 22, 1956, in Book 985 at Page 343. 13. Declaration of Protective and Restrictive Covenants on Block 1, 2 and 4 in Applewood Village, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado recorded June 18, 1959 in Book 1201 at Page 323. 14. Easements, notes, covenants, restrictions and rights-of-way as shown on the Plat of Applewood Village, recorded June 22, 1959 at Reception No. 763416 Plat Book 19 at Page 63. NOTE: Certified Copy of Resolution recorded March 12, 1968 in Book 2003 at Page 554. NOTE: Quitclaim Deed recorded September 27, 1968 in Book 2051 at Page 221. 15. Easement granted to The Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company by instrument recorded January 29, 1960 in Book 1250 at Page 382. 16. Easement granted to The Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company by instrument recorded January 29, 1960 in Book 1250 at Page.. 384. 17. Easement, granted to Northwest Lakewood Sanitation District, recorded August 23, 1960, in Book 1297 at Page 351. 18. Easement, granted to Northwest Lakewood Sanitation District, recorded August 23, 1960, in Book 1297 at Page 355. 19. Reservation of oil, gas, and other minerals contained in Warranty Deed recorded September 24, 1962 in Book 1524 at Page 64. NOTE: The Company makes no representation as to the present ownership of any such interests. There may be leases, grants, exceptions or reservations of interests that are not listed. 20. Easement, granted to Public Service Company of Colorado, recorded October 30, 1963, in Book 1652 at Page 38. 21. Easement, granted to Public Service Company of Colorado, recorded March 17, 1964, in Book 1690 at Page 580. 22. Easement, granted to Public Service Company of Colorado, recorded December 31, 1964, in Book 1768 at Page 164. 23. Easements contained in Warranty Deed recorded February 19, 1965 in Book 1778 at Page 278. 24. Sanitary Sewer Easement, granted to Westridge Sanitation District, recorded November 5, 1965, in Book 1832 at Page 558. 25. Easement, granted to Public Service Company of Colorado, recorded June 8, 1966, in Book 1877 at Page 157. 26. Reservation of easements contained in Resolution recorded January 9, 1967, in Book 1916 at Page 458. 27. General Public Utilities Easement recorded February 26, 1968 in Book 1999 at Page 786. 28. Drawing of subject property showing concrete irrigation conduits crossing subject property, attached to Agreement recorded June 24, 1971 in Book 2272 at Page 148. 29. Order of Consolidation, regarding Wheat Ridge Fire Protection District, recorded October 7, 1971, in Book 2305, at Page 895. 30. Utility Easement, granted to Public Service Company of Colorado, recorded October 21, 1971, in Book 2309, at Page 906. 31. Declaration of Covenants and Agreements recorded July 27, 1972 in Book 2403 at Page 294. 32. Right -of -Way Agreement with Consolidated Mutual Water Company, recorded October 31, 1972, in Book 2440, at Page 840. 33. Right -of -Way Easement, granted to Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company, recorded November 24, 1972, in Book 2449, at Pam. 34. Utility Easement, granted to Public Service Company of Colorado, recorded December 1, 1972, in Book 2451, at Page 672. 35. Utility Easement, granted to Public Service Company of Colorado, recorded December 29, 1972, in Book 2459, at Page 862. 36. Covenants and Restrictions Respecting Unified Ownership of Property recorded May 12, 1975, in Book 2728, at Page. 37. Utility Easement, granted to Public Service Company of Colorado, recorded July 3, 1975, in Book 2745 at Page. 38. Right -of -Way Agreement granted to The Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company, a Colorado corporation recorded October 1, 1975 in Book 2775 at Page 119. 39. Lease to The Bank of Applewood, disclosed by Notice of Ground Lease, recorded August 27, 1976, in Book 2895 at Page. 40. Applewood Village Development Plan Agreement recorded August 30, 1976, in Book 2896 at Page 160. 41. Utility Easement, granted to Public Service Company of Colorado, recorded September 17, 1976, in Book 2904 at Page 162. 42. Covenants and Restrictions Respecting Unified Ownership of Property recorded November 12, 1976 in Book 2926 at Page 630. 43. Official Development Plan for Applewood Village Shopping Center recorded August 19, 1977, at Reception No. 909490, and recorded December 28, 1977, at Reception No. 949552. NOTE: Applewood Village Shopping Center — Planned Commercial Development — Amended Final Plan, recorded November 18, 1982, at Reception No. 82081092. NOTE: Applewood Village Shopping Center — Planned Commercial Development — Amended Final Plan recorded October 22, 1984, at Reception No. 84099038. NOTE: Applewood Village Shopping Center — Planned Commercial Development — Amended Final Plan recorded September 11, 1986, at Reception No. 86108656. NOTE: Applewood Village Shopping Center — Planned Commercial Development — Amended Final Plan — Official Development Plan, Amendment #5, Phase 1, recorded September 2, 1994, at Reception No. 94145758. NOTE: Applewood Village Shopping Center — Planned Commercial Development — Amended Final Plan — Official Development Plan, Amendment #6, recorded September 22, 1995, at Reception No. F0119560. NOTE: Applewood Village Shopping Center — Planned Commercial Development — Amended Final Plan, recorded February 14, 2005, at Reception No. F2172791. NOTE: Applewood Village Shopping Center — Planned Commercial Development — Final Development Plan —Amendment 48, recorded December 30, 2010 at Reception No. 2010119958. 44. Utility Easement, granted to Public Service Company of Colorado, recorded May 31, 1978 at Reception No. 78048312. 45. Utility Easement, granted to Public Service Company of Colorado, recorded October 25, 1978 at Reception No. 78098329. 46. Indenture, with Northwest Lakewood Sanitation District, recorded October 7, 1985 at Reception No. 85096474. 47. Public Service Company of Colorado Utility Easement recorded June 13, 1986 at Reception No. 86064188. 48. Public Service Company of Colorado Utility Easement recorded June 13, 1986 at Reception No. 86064191. 49. Public Service Company of Colorado Utility Easement recorded July 22, 1986 at Reception No. 85982220 50. Public Service Company of Colorado Utility Easement recorded June 13, 1988 at Reception No. 86064191. 51. Lease to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., disclosed by Short Form Lease recorded November 18, 1987 at Reception No. 87140164. 52. Lease to Dillon Companies, Inc., d/b/a King Soopers, disclosed by Memorandum of Lease Agreement recorded October 19, 1988 at Reception No. 88102321. 53. Lease to Chili's, Inc., disclosed by Memorandum of Lease, recorded April 17, 1989 at Reception No. 89032473. 54. Permanent Easement, granted to the City of Wheat Ridge, recorded July 191, 1989 at Reception No. 89061577. 55. Permanent Easement, granted to the City of Wheat Ridge, recorded July 19, 1989 at Reception No. 89061578. 56. Permanent Easement, granted to the City of Wheat Ridge, recorded November 29, 1989 at Reception No. 89101624. 57. Memorandum of Lease recorded December 26, 1989 at Reception No. 89111291. 58. Right of Way Agreement with Consolidated Mutual Water Company, recorded February 27, 1990 at Reception No. 90016474. 59. Right of Way Agreement with Consolidated Mutual Water Company, recorded February 27, 1990, at Reception No. 90016475. 60. Right of Way Agreement with Consolidated Mutual Water Company, recorded February 27, 1990, at Reception No. 90016476. 61. Construction Agreement, with Consolidated Mutual Water Company, recorded February 27, 1990, at Reception No. 90016477. 62. Public Service Company of Colorado Utility Easement recorded March 14, 1990, at Reception No. 90020962. 63. Fire Line Agreement with Consolidated Mutual Water Company, recorded April 23, 1990, at Reception No. 90032752. 64. Public Service Company of Colorado Utility Easement recoded February 5, 1991, at Reception No. 91010272. 65. City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado Horizontal and Vertical Control Base Map recorded February 12, 1992 at Reception No. 92015075. 66. Fire Line Agreement with Consolidated Mutual Water Company, recorded September 18, 1992, at Reception No. 92116833. 67. Memorandum of Lease recorded August 9, 1993 at Reception No. 93119764. 68. ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey recorded October 27, 1993 at Reception No. 93174464. 69. Easement Agreement with the City and County of Denver, recorded November 10, 1993, at Reception No. 93186124. 70. Fire Line Agreement with Consolidated Mutual Water Company, recorded August 30, 1995, at Reception No. F0108078. 71. Fire Line Agreement with Consolidated Mutual Water Company, recorded August 30, 1995, at Reception No. F0108079. 72. Easement Agreement with Consolidated Mutual Water Company, recorded February 8, 1996, at Reception No. F0183243. 73. Construction Agreement, with Consolidated Mutual Water Company, recorded March 1, 1996, at Reception No. F0193344. 74. Easements, notes, covenants, restrictions and rights-of-way as set forth on the Plat of Applewood Village Shopping Center Subdivision, recorded March 1, 1996, at Reception No. F0193712. 75. Terms, provisions, conditions and obligations of Reciprocal Easement and Unified Control Agreement recorded March 1, 1996, at Reception No. F0193714. 76. Public Service Company of Colorado Easement recorded February 6, 2009 at Reception No. 2009010920. 77. Memorandum of Lease recorded January 14, 2009 at Reception No. 2009003153. 78. Memorandum of Lease by and between U S Retail Partners, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Landlord and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, a national banking association , Tenant, recorded February 28, 2011 at Reception No. 2011021154. 79. Notice of Perpetual Statutory Lien of Northwest Lakewood Sanitation District, in the amount of $1,380.00, recorded August 12, 2011, Reception No. 2011073711. 80. License Agreement recorded November 29, 2012 at Reception No. 2012128282. 81. Notice of Lien recorded October 31, 2013 at Reception No. 2013130331. 82. Existing leases and tenancies. 83. Easement as reserved in Deed recorded November 4, 1966 in Book 1906 at Pate 652. CONDITIONS 1. The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquired actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and Conditions and Stipulations and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. This Commitment is a contract to issue one or more title insurance policies and is not an abstract of title or a report of the condition of title. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. 5. The policy to be issued contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. You may review a copy of the arbitration rules at www.alta.M. stewart titleuarant J Y company Y All notices required to be given the Company and any statement in writing required to be furnished the Company shall be addressed to it at P.O. Box 2029, Houston, Texas 77252. Stewart Title MINERAL DISCLOSURE To comply with the provisions of C.R.S. 10-11-123, the Company makes the following disclosure: (a) That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate and that there is a substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and (b) That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner's permission. NOTE: THIS DISCLOSURE APPLIES ONLY IF SCHEDULE B, SECTION 2 OF THE TITLE COMMITMENT HEREIN INCLUDES AN EXCEPTION FOR SEVERED MINERALS. 3311 Elm Street S ]JD • Suite 105 Dallas, TX 75226 September 10, 2014 City of Wheat Ridge Community Development RE: Specific Development Plan: Wells Fargo Project Narrative 3490 Youngfield Street, Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 The intent of this Specific Development Plan is to combine the functions of an existing stand-alone branch bank with a stand-alone motor bank facility, both owned and operated by Wells Fargo. The existing branch bank parcel, which is located in the existing Applewood Shopping Center of Wheat Ridge, will be unchanged with the exception of the addition for a motor bank facility attached to the existing branch bank. The 6,423 SF branch bank facility was constructed around December 2010 and is primarily faced with brick and minimal stucco accents and has been unchanged since the original construction. Despite the new construction of the drive thru, the impact to the current site layout will be minimal. The proposed new Motor Bank construction will include demolition of an unoccupied and somewhat dilapidated one story building. The designed juxtaposition of the motor bank as a head in directional flow provides for screening of the headlights by the bank building itself as well as providing for pedestrian traffic to remain unaffected. The improvement to the site will include not only consolidation of the banking functions from two sites to one, but will also visually provide a more cohesive and richer texture, thus enhancing and updating the development. The proposed drive thru brick color scheme and material selection is intended to match the existing bank facility's color scheme and material selection which compliments the current shopping center thus providing contextual continuity with the surrounding. If there are any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Thomas W. Chapman, AIA Principal Architect SGDesign, Inc. 214-742-6044 SGD Project Narrative.doc Page 1 of 1 -4 91 City of `6� Wh6atl,'j-lld�ye CMOM UNiTy DEVELOPMENT Wheat Ridge Community Development Department PRE -APPLICATION MEETING SUMMARY Meeting Date: May 8, 2014 Applicant: Eric Chekal. Regency Centers 8480 E. Orchard Rd, Suite 6900 Greenwood Village, CO 801 1 1 Phone: 303-300-5335 Email: EricChekal(2,RegencyCenters com Dick Ansteth. Naos Design Group. LLC. 4949 South Syracuse Street. Suite 460 Denver, CO 80237 Phone: 303-759-5777 Email: dickaAnaosdg com Matthew Duhaime, Galloway 5300 DTC Parkway, Suite 100 Greenwood V i I lage. CO 801 1 1 Phone: 303-770-8884 Email: mattduhaime(cballowavUS com Gabe Krell, Kimley-Horn 990 South Broadway, Suite 200 Denver, CO 80209 Phone: 303-228-2324 Email: Rabe. krelIAkimley-horn corn Bryce Christensen. Kimley-Horn 990 South Broadway. Suite 200 Denver, CO 80209 Phone: 303-228-2339 Email: brvce.christensen(a)kimley-horn com Attending Staff: Wade Sanner, Planner I Lauren Mikulak, Planner If Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner Dave Brossman. Development Review Engineer Mark Westberg. Engineering Projects Supervisor Specific Site Location: Existing Zoning: Existing Comp. Plan Existing Site Conditions: Approximately 3400 Youngfield and 12525 W. 32nd Avenue Commercial -One (C-1) Primary Commercial Corridor, Community Commercial Center. Mixed -Use Commercial The two proposed development sites are located within the Applewood Village Shopping Center. The first proposal, for a Wells -Fargo Bank drive-thru addition, is located on the western edge of the shopping center. The second proposal, for a King Sooper's fuel center, is located at the southeast corner of the shopping center. The Applewood Shopping Center is comprised of approximately 65 acres in the western quadrant of the City of Wheat Ridge, adjacent to the 1-70 corridor. The shopping center is bordered by West 38`h Avenue to the north, a mix of residential neighborhoods to the east, West 32"d to the south, and Youngfield Street to the west. Of the 16 parcels that comprise the Applewood Village Shopping Center, the proposed development sites are comprised of five parcels of the shopping center. The five parcels are zoned Restricted Commercial (R -C), Neighborhood Commercial (N -C), and Planned Commercial Development (PCD). To explain the proposed development in detail, this narrative describes existing conditions and preliminary proposals in regards to Site A (Wells -Fargo Bank drive- thru facility) and Site B (King Sooper's fuel center). Site A Site A is located on the western edge of the center of the Applewood Shopping Center. To the north of Site A is the northern portion of the Applewood Shopping center zoned PCD, and a retail building owned by Showme Mountain Investors, LLC zoned Commercial -One (C-1). To the west is the 1-70 corridor owned by Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) and zoned Agriculture -One (A-1). To the south and east are parking lots and other structures located in the shopping center zoned PCD. Zoning Site Location 2 Access to the site is from an internal drive with connection to Youngfield Street to the west. Currently existing on the site is a 9,494 square foot restaurant/office building. In 2010 the existing structure on the property was demolished and a new Wells Fargo Bank huilding was developed. The existing drive-through for the bank is currently located to the south on property addressed as 3298 Youngfield. Site B Site B is located in the southeast corner of the Applewood Shopping Center. To the north and west of Site B are other interior drives and buildings in the central portion of the shopping center with PCD zoning To the south of the proposed development is W 32nd Avenue - To the east is an insurance office and parking lot zoned Neighborhood Commercial (N -C). Note: The parking lot is part of the proposed development site. A number of easements run through Site B. A drainage easement runs through the northwest corner of the proposed fuel center. Utility easements run along the perimeter of each parcel of the proposed site. Access to the upper portion of the site is from an internal drive to the east that runs south to West 32nd Avenue. Existing on the site is an 18,750 square foot office/retail building which is vacant. Another small retail building with 1,767 square feet is located to the southwest directly adjacent to the entrance drive from 32nd into the center. The property to the south is devoid of structures and has direct access to 32nd Avenue. A significant change in elevation exists on the southeastern portion of the site. There is an 1840 o drop in elevation from the southern section of the proposed site to West 32nd Avenue. From the neighborhood to the east to the proposed site is a 12 -foot change in elevation. This change in elevation creates significant visibility to the site from both West 32"d Avenue and the neighborhoods to the south and east. Applicant/Owner Preliminary Proposal: The applicant, Regency Centers, is proposing two new development sites on the western edge and southeast corner of the Applewood Shopping Center. Proposal Site A The applicant is proposing an auto -bank drive -up facility with canopy to service the existing Wells - Fargo Bank. A 9,494 square foot restaurant/office building exists on the site of the proposed drive -up facility. The 7,514 square foot vacant restaurant portion of the building will be removed to make room for the drive-thru facility. The 1,980 square foot office portion of the building will remain. Proposed access to the drive-thru facility will continue to be from the existing internal drive with connection onto Youngfield Street. In 2010, a new Wells Fargo bank was constructed but an off-site drive through location at 3298 Youngfield remained. It is the intent of this proposal to relocate the drive-through next to the new bank building. The proposed drive through will complement the existing bank with regard architectural features and materials. The proposed expansion site is addressed as 3490 Youngfield. Proposal Site B The applicant is proposing the construction of a King Sooper's fuel service center in the southeast corner of the Applewood Shopping Center. In order to construct the fuel station, a number of alterations to the existing site are proposed to allow sufficient space, stormwater detention, and traffic circulation. The existing 18,750 square foot office/retail building and smaller strip building will be demolished to provide space for development. To incorporate the four adjacent lots to the south and east, the applicant is proposing to rezone and consolidate the lot lines of the parcels zoned N -C and R -C into the Applewood Shopping Center. The current addresses of the properties included are 3200 Wright Court, 12525 W. 32 Avenue, 3250 Youngfield and 12627 W. 32nd Avenue. A portion of the property to the south, adjacent to West 32nd Avenue will be dedicated as right-of-way (ROW) to allow for a right -turn lane and sidewalk on West 32"d Avenue. Site A ' MAD ii E[6T RaTarW kno wwMW c W" LSI � J The proposed fuel center will be comprised of nine fuel pumps with a small building for one employee. The nine fuel pumps will be covered by an overhead canopy. Due to the significant grade change between the site and West 32nd Avenue, the fuel center will be elevated significantly above the road and the neighborhoods to the east and south. Lighting from the canopy will be directed down towards the individual fuel pumps. To buffer the fuel station from the adjacent neighborhood to the east and south the applicant is proposing to install vertical landscaping along the southeast corner of the property. Three access points to the fuel center site are proposed, two access points will be to the internal drive which connects to West 32nd Avenue. Internal traffic flow will enter from the southern access point and exit from the northern access point. The third internal drive will curve around the building to the north, and connect the fuel center to an existing parking lot to the northeast. 4 IOEM=.am _. T .- vbvosm�m�c MonoshwD Ica '� "UTOK Ig1�MTE i t i i !W{FM1mPGD �. � � 1 RMR(SS�OM7LIIE ' rOMcebn ' 9M10 UMM" ..� R8UM The proposed fuel center will be comprised of nine fuel pumps with a small building for one employee. The nine fuel pumps will be covered by an overhead canopy. Due to the significant grade change between the site and West 32nd Avenue, the fuel center will be elevated significantly above the road and the neighborhoods to the east and south. Lighting from the canopy will be directed down towards the individual fuel pumps. To buffer the fuel station from the adjacent neighborhood to the east and south the applicant is proposing to install vertical landscaping along the southeast corner of the property. Three access points to the fuel center site are proposed, two access points will be to the internal drive which connects to West 32nd Avenue. Internal traffic flow will enter from the southern access point and exit from the northern access point. The third internal drive will curve around the building to the north, and connect the fuel center to an existing parking lot to the northeast. 4 Signage would incorporate a monument sign along West 32nd Avenue. Gas price signs would be on the station canopy and would face into the Applewood Shopping Center. The applicant is looking at a master sign plan in the future to incorporate the various businesses and their signage needs within the overall shopping center. A stormwater detention pond will be constructed to the east of the proposed fuel center at the bottom of the ridge on the two lots zoned N -C. The stormwater detention pond will incorporate water runoff for the entire southern section of the shopping center, and be part of the overall planned development. Along the edge of the detention pond vertical landscaping will be planted to screen the site from the neighborhood to the east. Will a neighborhood meeting need to be held prior to application submittal? Yes, the request to rezone the parcels in the southeast corner and amend the ODP or rezone to Mixed - Use Commercial Interstate requires a neighborhood meeting. Planning Division comments: The following items Nvere discussed based on the applicant's proposal: Sire A A planned development is intended to promote innovative developments, flexible site design, and efficient use. Planned developments are developed according to approved plans which have their own list of permitted uses. Development standards set the allowable setbacks, density, and other zoning parameters. The original planned development document for the Applewood Shopping Center was approved in 1975. There is not a list of permitted uses detailed on the document; however it has generally been Staff's position that all C-1 uses are permitted in the development. Through the years there have been uses which are special uses now but in 1975 were allowed uses. Those would include gas stations and drive-through facilitates. Therefore, an amendment to the existing ODP is not needed to establish the drive-thru as a permitted use. However, an administrative amendment to the development plan for this portion of the proposal will be required through a specific development plan process. In 2010 the shopping center development plan was amended to allow a new Wells Fargo Bank through an amended Final Development Plan — Amendment #8 Wells Fargo Bank at Applewood Shopping Center Official Development Plan (ODP) Amendment. The proposed drive-through will be accessory and complimentary to the primary bank use on this portion of the center. A neighborhood meeting is not required prior to this application. Site B The proposed fuel center site encompasses five lots zoned PCD, N -C and R -C. The applicant is proposing an amendment to the Applewood Shopping Center Planned Development to incorporate the additional parcels needed to accommodate the redevelopment. The extent of this redevelopment includes a stonnwater detention pond to serve the overall development. Neither the RC or NC zone districts allow fueling station; therefore, the properties need to be rezoned to PCD and be incorporated into the master Specific Development Plan for the shopping center. In order to do this, a new ODP document will be required which encompasses the entire shopping center. Staff had several comments regarding design of the gas station site. It was suggested that the site plan be modified by moving the proposed structures further to the east and north. This would eliminate some of the parking north of the facility and would provide space for a potential plaza. and landscaping for the building to the north. This buffer would also provide additional screening for the restaurant's outdoor patio seating on the south side of the building. Exterior lighting standards will need to be met to prevent spill-over effects to the neighboring residential properties to the east and south. According to section 26-503. all light fixtures must be fully shielded. For commercial development a lighting and photometric plan must be submitted to show locations. lamp type/wattage. mounting heights. and design and finishes of fixtures. It was recommended that additional screening by trees be used to mitigate the impacts. Plaiting In the past. proposed improvements to the Applewood Shopping Center have been done by amendment to the planned development. Staff raised concerns about the various pieces of the proposal of integrating Site B into the overall shopping center. Staff has determined that the rezoning. lot consolidation with the dedication of right-of-way for the properties at 12525 West 32nd Avenue (PIN: 39-292-11-021) and 3200 Wright Court (PIN: 39-292-11-018) will require a new plat for the southern portion of the shopping center. A final plat will be required in order to build on the site. Architectural and Site Design Manual The City's Architectural and Site Design Manual (ASDM) provides guidance related to the site and building design of new commercial, industrial, mixed-use and multi -family development. The site at entire Applewood Shopping Center at 3400 Youngfield Street is located in the Contemporary Overlay District in the ASDM. Chapter 2.2 of the ASDM states that: The Contemporary Overlay District applies on commercial corridors where a walkable environment is desired but where greater flexibility for the placement of buildings and parking lots is sensible. It promotes site design that makes buildings visible from the street but utilizes a greater build -to range than the traditional overlay. Chapter 3 of the ASDM includes guidance related to site design. and includes standards relating to pedestrian connectivity. building placement build -to areas. parking placement. and screening buffers. Chapter 4 includes building design standards for commercial/retail and mixed-use buildings. Building Division comments: The building division was not present and has no comments at this time. A demolition permit will be required by the Building Division to remove the existing buildings on the property. The City has adopted and currently enforces the 2006 Edition of the International Codes and the 2011 Edition of the National Electrical Code. The City uses the 2003-A 117.1 ANSI Standard in determining requirements related to building accessibility. 0 Please contact Chief Building Official John Schumacher for any additional questions related to building codes or required submittals for future building permits. He can be reached at 303-235-2853 or ischumacheraci.wheatridge.co.us. Public Works comments: The following items were discussed based on the applicant's proposal: Traffic Staff recommended the consolidation of access to Site B to one access point. Staff recommended a right -in only access with traffic circulation around the building to the north. Drainage A final drainage report signed and sealed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Colorado shall be required. The report must describe how full stormwater flood attenuation detention incorporating water quality measures for the proposed site will be achieved. Public Works recommends that a regional detention facility be considered for the shopping center, and that this proposed project site drain into that regional facility. Currently a temporary pond exists in the south central portion of the shopping center. Public Improvements When new properties are created in the city through the subdivision process, staff reviews the proposal based on current standards. In addition to ensuring that new parcels meets minimum lot size and width standards, staff also confirms that adjacent street impro%ements meet current roadway design and drainage standards. In order to promote high-quality multi -modal streets throughout Wheat Ridge, the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan establishes design standards for the City's bike/pedestrian routes. W. 32nd Avenue is identified in the plan as a bicycle route. When a new subdivision is platted along bike routes, right-of-way dedication and/or installation of streetscape improvements are typically required. Process Site A - SDP Amendment An administrative amendment to the Specific Development Plan (SDP) will be required for Site A. The first step in the SDP amendment process is to hold a Pre -Application meeting, which was completed on May 8, 2014. The next step is to submit an SDP amendment application showing all of the improvements to the lot. This should include enough information so that access, circulation and landscaping for the entire property including the bank. Please note that you must schedule a meeting with a staff planner to submit the application. Incomplete applications will not be accepted. After the SDP amendment application is submitted, a staff planner will be assigned to review the case. The case manager will review the submittal application for content. If all submittal requirements have been met, the proposal will be referred to outside service agencies and other City agencies for their V► review and comment. generally for a period of 15 days. After all comments have been received. the case manager will forward those to the applicant. Modifications to the Specific Development Plan may be required as a result of these comments. There may be more than one review required before the documents are ready for administrative approval. Once all comments and requirements have been met. the Specific Development Plan application will be submitted to the community development director for approval. The director can approve, deny or approve the SDP with conditions. if the SDP amendment is approved. a mylar of the SDP amendment with original signatures must be provided to the City for recording with the Jefferson County Clerk & Recorders office within 60 days. Southern Portion of the Shopping Center - Lot Consolidation A lot consolidation essentially combines two or more adjacent parcels and creates a single larger lot. In this case. a consolidation plat is the document that will remove the lot line currently separating the two parcels that make up the property at 12525 West 32"d Avenue and 3200 Wright Court. The consolidation plat must be prepared by a surveyor who is licensed in the State of Colorado. The consolidation should also include the strip of property with unclear title located between the parking lot parcel and the piece to the north. It is staffs understanding that the owner is working with Renewal Wheat Ridge to clear title and for acquisition of this piece. The first step in the process began with the pre -application meeting on May 8. 2014. The next step will be to proceed with the consolidation plat application. An application for the lot consolidation may be submitted at any time. After a complete application is submitted, a staff planner will be assigned to handle the case. This person is the project manager for the case and will be the contact at the City throughout the entire consolidation process. The case manager will review the submittal application for content and the proposal will be referred to affected service agencies (Xcel Energy, water district, fire district. etc.) and other City agencies (Public Works, Building Division, etc.) for their review and comment for a period of 15 days. After all comments have been received, the case manager will forward those to the applicant. Modifications to the plat document may be required as a result of these comments. This review and comment process can occur more than once. Once all comments have been addressed, a black line Mylar will be submitted to the Community Development Department with appropriate recording fees. Findings will be prepared by the case manager for the Community Development Director who will sign the plat document Mylar for recordation. When the plat is recorded with the Jefferson County Clerk and Recorder the lot consolidation becomes official. Site B - Zone change and Planned Development Approval Process There are two distinct steps in establishing a planned development or in redefining its boundaries: 1) Zone changed and approval of an Outline Development Plan (ODP), and 2) approval of a Specific Development Plan (SDP). The SDP and ODP are both approved at public hearings, however, the applications may be submitted concurrently or individually. The next step in the process is to hold a neighborhood meeting which is required for the zone change to planned development. For this meeting, the applicant must notify all property owners within a 600 - foot radius of the property. Notification may be via first class mail or hand delivery. The Community Development Department will supply the applicant with a list of all property owners within the 600 - foot radius. A sample notification letter is provided and can be used as a template. The letter will need to be approved by a planner before it is mailed. The fee for the neighborhood meetings is $100 plus 50 cents for each page of address labels (average is $243). In this situation because the exterior perimeters of the ODP are being expanded, the noticing list will include properties along 38`h Avenue and Wright Court. The meeting date, time, and location should be coordinated with a staff member. The fee associated with the neighborhood meeting is $100 for staff presence, plus 50 cents for each page of address labels (average is $243). Meetings can be held at City Hall or at a location the applicant desires. The meeting will be led by the applicant and should inform those who are in attendance what is being proposed. After the neighborhood meeting is held, the applicant may submit a formal application. When the application is submitted, a staff planner will be assigned to handle the case. This person is the project manager for the case and will be the contact at the City throughout the entire zone change process. The case manager will review the submittal application for content. If all submittal requirements have been met, the proposal will be referred to outside service agencies (Xcel Energy, water district, fire district, etc.) and other City agencies (Public Works, Economic Development, etc.) for their review and comment, generally for a period of 15 days. After all comments have been received. the case manager will forward those to the applicant. Modifications to the planned development documents may be required as a result of these comments. After all comments have been addressed, a public hearing before Planning Commission will be scheduled. Planning Commission will make a recommendation of approval, approval with conditions or denial. The public hearing procedure is replicated before City Council for final approval. Once approved, a blackline mylar copy of the development plans must be recorded with the Jefferson County Clerk and Recorder. If the SDP is submitted separate from and subsequent to approval of the ODP, then the referral process is repeated for the SDP, and the SDP is approved by the Planning Commission. Site Plan Review The next step in the process is to submit a complete application including a site plan, landscape plan, and building elevations; refer to the attached site plan checklist. Please make an appointment with a planner to submit the application. Upon receipt of a complete application, the submitted documents will be reviewed by the case manager. The staff planner will send the application to outside service agencies (Xcel Energy, water district, fire district, etc.) and other City agencies (Public Works, Economic Development, etc.) for review. This referral period is 15 days long and allows time for agencies to comment on the application. 9 After all comments have been received, the case manager will forward those to the applicant. Comments will address any areas of concerns. Modifications to the application may be required as a result of these comments. The applicant must address all comments and resubmit the relevant documents and drawings. Once all comments and requirements have been met, the case manager will refer the site plan application to the Community Development Director for final approval. A copy of the approved site plan will be kept on file at the Community Development Department. Building Permit Approval of the site plan application does not mean that a building permit has been issued. Once site plan approval is attained, the applicant may submit a building permit application to the Building Division. Please refer to the Building Division's permit submittal checklist for new multifamily construction: httR://www ci wheatridge co us/1068/Permit-Submittal-information. Utility Providers The City of Wheat Ridge is not a full-service city. The utility and service providers for this property include: • Consolidated Mutual Water District: 303-238-0451 • Northwest Lakewood Sanitary District: 303-987-0835 • Wheat Ridge Fire District #2: 303403-5900 All land use applications will be sent on referral to these agencies for comment; however staff encourages potential applicants to contact service districts ahead of time. This may help to understand any design or infrastructure requirements and potential costs associated with the proposed project. Attachments: Planned Development Handout, Site Plan Handout, Lot Consolidation Handout, Public Works Comments Phone Numbers Meredith Reckert — Senior Planner 303-235-2848 Lauren Mikulak — Planner II 303-235-2845 Wade Sanner — Planner 1 303-235-2849 Mark Westberg — Engineering Projects Supervisor 303-235-2863 Dave Brossman — Development Review Engineer 303-235-2864 John Schumacher — Chief Building Official 303-235-2853 Steve Art — Economic Development Manager 303-235-2806 10 V � t, I-VCityof ]�qrWh6atR�.. e LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION Community Development Department 7500 West 29h Avenue o Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 o Phone (303) 235-2845 (Please print or type all information) Applicant__M. [ACM Address _ 0 "i - �o Phon 3b��$-5Za City t tyT _ State CO Zip Fax Owner U 5 P_Ci14 t t- P,tli�-t,,4: LLC - Address�$p_ . dl'cti Phon 3tN3 -*c 5 City. �p �? �^ State Ca _ p 11l Far<�o�i ta`i i —to90 s Contact Z, MW G ;M Address 5601f.Phon 3b� City }}j,t�i�v+ State_ �� . Zip t21 Fax (rhe person fisted as entad will be contacted to answer questions regarding this application, prov= additional information when necessary, post public hearing signs, will receive a copy orthe staff report prior to Public Hearing, and shall be responsible for forwarding all verbal mid written communication to applicant and owner.) Location of request Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions Iisted below which pertain to your request): Please refer to subtr&el cheakllsts for complde applicrttlatt tOquire» mats; btaanrP10te gWicadom will not be aacelrled. ❑ Change of zone or zone conditions ❑ Consolidation Plat ❑ Special Use Permit ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Subdivision: Minor (5 lots or less) 0 Subdivision: Major (More than 5 lots) CI Flood Plain Special Exception Q Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Site Plan approval ❑ Concept Plan approval ❑ Temporary Use, Building, Sign Oj�arianee/Waiver (from Section 13 Planned Building Group ❑ Right of Way Vacation Vother:�: � 1i Wit; Detailed description of request:, Required information: Assessors Parcel Number: 39 -- 292 - 01 2. Current Zoning. CD Current Use:;g��t�y�� ����� Size of Lot (acnes or square footage): I:3. ss 2 Proposed Zoning: Pc t�) Proposed Use: 1 cer* that the informalion and exhibits herewith submilted are lure and correct to the best nfmy knmPledge and that in flling this applleatia% lam acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above, wit Apptiaants other than ow>tera lana, submit er;�y frau the i what I the req coon cannot lmvfully be accomplished r wh' sd of on on his behalf. - �r e.✓ uc�01° Notarized Signature of A�pp�t State of Colorado County of .hse } ss _ ANN MARIE DINKEL The foregoing instrument (Land Use ProcessinApplication) was acknowledged NOTARY PUBLIC by me this 9n day of OcI4.W 20/4 by _r; STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID 20084042789 maty Puri iic MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 12(1712016 My commission expires l a-/ i ) /2o I La To be filled out by sta�j� ,r��� Z Date received l0 �— — Fee :& Receipt Nai" I O Case Nu. W2_ - t -t —t Camp Plan Design. 'tonin Related Case No. Pre -App Mig. Date _ Quarter Section M Case Manager City of Wheat Kid e 10/26/N14 08:.9 CDBB ,dZ-14-12!3400 YOUN FIELD ST. ACiOUNT CDB01095`980.00 ZL1�41N(; APPLICATION FEES FMSD AflOUNT ppM.ENT RECEIVED 980.00 CHECK: 13221 380.00 TOTAL ----------------------------- ------------ Case No. Case De: Date Received 10/17/201411 Related Cases Case Planner 1 ec er . ............. . . ......... ....... ..... . .. . ......... . ....... pecific Development Plan A,p,p&-jn�f lmi?lwabin? Name ',Lori Smith Name Phone (303) 658-5202 tc Wo� . . ........ Cit I State CO Zip 80121- ,5601 S. Broadway #400 .......... - -.4 . ...................................... .... . ....... .. . ........... --- . .... ...... ............. ...................... ............ ..................... ............... ........ . . ....... . .. .... .. ..... ... ... ......................... . 0"W" InIMA069W Name US Retail Partners, LLC Name Phone 1(303) 300-5335 .......... . .............. ........ � Address i8480 E. Orchard St. city Greenwood Village State Zip bbffi - - ------------ -- ---- :-*---��-:�:�--�� -------------- ... ............. - . ........ ... .. ...... ......... . ...... . .. . .. . — --- - ------- contawt 1fd0fMd&W Name e11s Name ;Lori S"mi'th--'-- Phone (303) 658-5202-'--. . . . . .... . . ............... . .......... - ------- Address 5601 S. Broadway #400 City pt eton State CO zip .... .... ... . ... - ................ - ----------------------------- City State CO Address 3400 Street ngfiWki Ridge zip 80033:�� . ......... . -=7 .......... . .. ...... .... .. . ....... . ...... . ...... ................ . -- Location Description . Project Name .. .. .......... . ....... . ..... ... . .. . . ... ......... . . . ........ . .... ........... . . . . - - ---------- - .... ....... Parcel No Qtr Section District No Parcel No. J9-2-05.012 Qtr Section: `NW29 District No.: all 1 3929205012.NW29 :3 ferias ' Fre-App Date 4!24/201App AP01 420 Neighborhood Meeting Date N .... .... .. . Review Type Review Body Review Date Disposition Comments Report Public Hearing PC -- -- ------- DisJrosifmrr D Case Disposition Disposition Date Conditions of Approval Res # Ord It .................... . Notes Status Open Storage: CiofWheat Ridge 10/20/20i4 08:3, CDBB WZ-14-12/3400 YOUNGFIELD ST. CDB010955 AMOUNT FMSD ZONING APPLICATION FE,,..S 980.00 PAYMENT RECEIVED AMOUNT CHECK: 13226 980.00 TOTAL 1380.00