Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPBG-15-01- I r, City of _/ WheatIjdoe The following case numbers relate to the request for construction of a self -storage facility on property at 5130 Miller Street. Case No. WA -16-02 was a request for approval of a drive aisle width variance (20' where 22' is the minimum width specified in the zoning code) on property zoned I -E at 5130 Miller Street. Case No. PBG -15-01 was a request for approval of a planned building group on property zoned I -E at 5130 Miller Street. All files pertaining to these two cases can be found in the case file for PBG -15-01. " i A .I ,- City of `� Wheat Iiclge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29`h Ave. June 7, 2016 Greg Herbers Parfet Storage, LLC 14995 Foothill Road Golden, CO 80401 Dear Mr. Herbers: Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 At its meeting of May 19, 2016, Planning Commission DENIED of Case No. PBG -15-01, a request for approval of a Planned Building Group to allow six proposed storage buildings and the existing office/home to be used as an office/home for the site manager for property located at 5130 Parfet Street, for the following reasons: 1. The modifications are still not sufficient to meet the intent and purpose of the Planned Building Group plan. 2. There are still concerns for interior circulation as the plan is substandard to industry standards. 3. There are still concerns regarding the architecture being proposed for questionable compliance with the ASDM and suitability for the site. 4. The plan does not comply with section 26-502.B.4b: the locations, types, sizes and quantities of proposed plant and other materials. Common and botanical names should be identified adjacent to all plant material or by use of a key and legend. 5. There is light spillage onto adjacent property. Please feel free to contact me at 303-235-2846 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Tammy Odean Administrative Assistant Enclosure: Draft of Minutes cc: PBG -15-01 (case file) PBG 1501.doc www.ci.w heatridge.co.us 7. PUBLIC HEARING A. Case No. PBG -15-01: an application filed by Parfet Storage for approval of a Planned Building Group to allow six proposed storage buildings and the existing office/home to be used as an office/home for the site manager for the property located at 5130 Parfet Street. Before the hearing Commissioner OHM asked Commissioner TIMMS three questions to see if he is eligible to vote for the motion because he was absent from the previous meeting. First, whether he had reviewed the minutes from the April 21" PC meeting along with the agenda packet. Second, whether he had viewed the video from the April 21 PC meeting. Third, whether he feels like he can make an informed decision. Commissioner TIMMS answered yes to all three questions. Ms. Reckert gave a short presentation regarding the continuance of PBG -15-01. She briefly explained what has transpired since the April 21 meeting and stated the piece of land in primary focus is the northern lot of the property which currently has an 1100 sq. ft. building with detached garage on it. The southern lot is undeveloped with only a detention facility on it and there is also a connecting piece of land connecting the two lots. The property was rezoned a year ago to Industrial - Employment (I -E). She continued that at the conclusion of the previous meeting a list of photometric and landscaping concerns, from Commissioner OHM, were given to the applicant; the applicant agreed to the ROW reservation for future construction of 50' Avenue; the drainage plan was modified to move the pond out of the ROW reservation; the internal drive aisles were not increased in width to 25 -feet, however the applicant said they will restrict trucks longer than 17 -feet, from entering the property with a sign at the entrance; modification were made to the landscape plan except species are still not specified; no changes were made to the PBG layout, photometric and building elevation sheets; and staff recommended again that an architect be hired to analyze the architecture and provide perspective drawings. Ms. Reckert explained that the applicant requests approval of the PBG with revised sheets with the following conditions: Commercial vehicles be limited to 17 -feet in length; architecture and building elevations be prepared by a licensed architect for the building permit submittal; and revisions will be made to the landscaping and lighting sheets prior to building permit submittal. She also stated that staff's recommendation is for denial for the following reasons: inability of staff to monitor truck sizes into the site and the potential negative impact on Parfet; circulation and interior aisle widths are substandard to industry standards; landscaping does not include species designation; building architecture has questionable fagade detail and articulation; primary and secondary material may not meet minimum coverage Planning Commission Minutes -2— May 2— May 19, 2016 percentages; and finally the unwillingness of the applicant to hire an architect to help resolve the former two issues. Commissioner DORSEY asked if the retention pond has been addressed on the southern lot. Also, he stated he had concerns with aisle widths. Mr. Brossman said he has received positive feedback, the pond will be moved out of the reservation area. Commissioner TIMMS asked how the City would monitor the length of trucks in and out of the property. Ms. Reckert replied that it will be difficult because there would have to be physical observation. Commissioner TIMMS asked if in the past an applicant hasn't listed the species of plants proposed to being used. Ms. Reckert added that a list of species has been given; it is just too open ended on where the plants will be placed. Commissioner TIMMS inquired about the architecture and asked if this level of architecture has been used before. Ms. Reckert stated the city has not seen this before and usually, at this point, City staff has an architect provide an analysis of all the materials being used. Due to the lack of detail and analysis makes it difficult to analyze the fagade articulation. Commissioner BUCKNAM had questions with regards to transparency and the Architectural and Site Design Manual's (ASDM) mandate of 15% transparency, but there is no mention of it. Ms. Reckert explained that faux glazing is allowed making it impossible to see into the western building. Commissioner OHM stated he did not think there is much change to the landscape plan and asked about the regulation for putting a tree next to curb and gutters. Also, he wanted to know if staff feels this submittal is complete. Ms. Reckert replied that staff does not believe the submittal is complete. She also stated that it is the applicant's choice to plant a tree next to curb and gutter and it is the chance they take if the curb cracks. Commissioner OHM asked whether sight triangles should be included on the plan. Planning Commission Minutes -3— May 3— May 19, 2016 Ms. Reckert stated that the sight triangle requirement would only be by the entrance and since it is not a public street, the sight triangle is 15 -feet. Commissioner OHM asked if there is a revised lighting plan due to light spillage on to adjacent properties as shown on the original plan. Ms. Reckert stated there is not. Commissioner BUCKNAM asked about the properties to the south that are zoned Agricultural and whether they contain residences. Ms. Reckert confirmed that the adjacent property to the south contains a residence and a green house. Commissioner BUCKNAM asked about the 6 -foot fence on the southern end of the property and if it will be part of a sight triangle once it gets closer to Parfet Street. Ms. Reckert stated the fence will need to taper down to 4 -feet as it gets closer to Parfet Street. Commissioner WEAVER stated concern about drainage impacts to the property to the south. Mr. Brossman explained there will be curb and gutter to help catch the water so there is no runoff onto the neighboring property. Noah Nemmers — Baseline Engineering 1950 Ford Street, Golden Mr. Nemmers thanked the Commission for the continuance and gave a brief update from his perspective since the April 21 meeting. The applicant received language regarding the right-of-way reservation from Mr. Brossman and landscape comments from Commissioner OHM. He received an inquiry from staff about revising plans but no mention of drive aisle or architecture concerns. He indicated that he thought they met the criteria and had heard that staff's original recommendation was for approval. He then found out Staff's recommendation in the report was for denial, even though he thought they met ASDM requirements. Mr. Nemmers felt that bringing an architect on -board without understanding the architectural deficiencies would be ineffective. Mr. Nemmers stated the primary materials reflect 40% stucco and would begin above the foundations and would not be in direct contact with the ground. Secondary material will include a combination of corrugated metal panels, wood accent trim and spandrel glass. He explained the glazing reflected on the elevations meets the 15% transparency and gives the appearance of windows but provides no security risk to the tenants. Planning Commission Minutes -4— May 4— May 19, 2016 Mr. Nemmers explained the site plan layout was provided by Mako, an industry leader in self -storage planning and construction, and aisles were widened from 20 - feet to 22 -feet to meet the minimum requirement for commercial drive aisles. The fire lane on the south and east side of the property is 24 to 26 -feet wide. He stated a 30 -foot moving truck is well in excess of the largest truck most consumers can rent. These are private access lanes and the owner/operator accepts the risks involved and building corners will be constructed with steel bollards for protection. Mr. Nemmers stated the photometric plan was not revised because it uses full cutoff approved LED fixtures to control spill light. If need be, they could revisit the plan to add some shielding to control any spill light. With regards to the landscaping plan, it can be refined if there is still more information wanted, but would like to keep the species list loose. Mr. Nemmers indicated that he feels the application is consistent with the PBG approval criteria which includes regulations in the zoning/development code and the standards in the ASDM. He feels staff gave insufficient direction regarding deficiencies of the proposed architecture. Mr. Nemmers stated that if the Planning Commission decision is denial than the applicant can appeal to Jefferson County District Court. He requested the Commission approve the request with conditions contained in the staff memo. Commissioner BUCKNAM stated with regards to the ASDM he has concerns with the southern facades which face a residential property. He would like to see the facade on the southern facing building ends be similar to that of Building A. He requested clarification on the window glazing on Building A. Commissioner TIMMS asked how the applicant is going to enforce access to trucks only 17 -feet and under onto the site and would a Suburban towing a trailer be able to access the site. Commissioner TIMMS also wanted to know how many storage units will be part of this facility. Mr. Nemmers stated a moving truck which is about '/2 ton or under, will be allowed and the manager will be keeping an eye on who enters the facility. Also, the applicant does not believe there will be large trucks accessing this site because the storage unit sizes are not going to be for large items like a car. Mr. Nemmers indicated that there will be 106 units. Commissioner TIMMS inquired about the resistance to hiring an architect. Mr. Nemmers stated that the owner Mr. Greg Herbers has been doing the architectural drawing to this point because he knows what he wants to see done. An architect will be hired to do the drawings for the building permit submittal. Planning Commission Minutes -5— May 5— May 19, 2016 Commissioner OHM expressed concerns about the landscape plan and asked if a licensed landscape architect had done the drawing for this site. Mr. Nemmers replied that one is not required per the code. Commissioner OHM stated that for a commercial property a licensed landscape architect will need to stamp the final plan before construction begins. He explained it is hard to keep a species list loose when it needs to be put on the plans to show caliper size of a tree or seed mix for grasses. Commissioner TIMMS asked how the structure plan to the south is designated. Ms. Reckert stated the property to the south is designated as Employment. She also explained to the Commission that she has worked with the applicant to upgrade the architectural drawings and to widen the drive aisles, but they have not wanted to move forward because it would be too expensive. Mr. Nemmers stated if the architectural design on the drawings is liked by all then they will move forward. Commissioner WEAVER stated she is not against this PBG, but she wants to see architectural drawing of exactly what the buildings are going to look like. She also wanted to know if the case is approved, can there be conditions for the drive aisles. Ms. Reckert replied that there definitely can be conditions, if approved. Commissioner BUCKNAM stated his primary concern is the southern elevations due to the residential home adjacent to the property. He also added that he wants to visit the transparency/ faux glazing issue with regards to the ASDM requirements. It was moved by Commissioner TIMMS and seconded by Commissioner BUCKNAM to DENY Case No. PBG -15-01, a request for approval of a planned building group site plan on property zoned I -E at 5130 Parfet Street, for the following g reasons: 1. The modifications are still not sufficient to meet the intent and purpose of the Planned Building Group plan. 2. There are still concerns for interior circulation as the plan is substandard to industry standards. 3. There are still concerns regarding the architecture being proposed for questionable compliance with the ASDM and suitability for the site. 4. The plan does not comply with section 26-502.B.4b: the locations, types, sizes and quantities of proposed plant and other materials. Common and botanical names should be identified adjacent to all plant material or by use of a key and legend. Planning Commission Minutes -6— May 6— May 19, 2016 5. There is light spillage onto adjacent property. Motion passed 5-1, with BUCKNAM, DORSEY, OHM and WEAVER approving; Kimsey not supporting; therefore, the case was denied. 8. OTHER ITEMS Ms. Reckert mentioned a few items going before City Council Study Sessions including: Wadsworth EAS, 38th Corridor design and ADU's. 9. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Commissioner WEAVER and seconded by Commissioner BUCKNAM to adjourn the meeting at 8:17 p.m. Motion carried 6-0. Scott Ohm, Chair Tammy Odean, Recording Secretary Planning Commission Minutes May 19, 2016 -7— Meredith Reckert From: Meredith Reckert Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 4:43 PM To: 'Noah Nemmers' Subject: 5130 Parfet Hi, Noah I wanted to get back to you regarding the 5130 Parfet Street PBG application. Pursuant to Section 26-107 of the zoning and development code, "a new application for substantially the same development process may not be refiled for one year after denial." Let me know if you have additional questions. Meredith Meredith Reckert, AICP Senior Planner 7500 W. 29`h Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Office Phone: 303-235-2848 FAX: 303-235-2857 www.ci.wheatridge.co.us g�City cyf i [.iL\IMlJN1iY C�FYFIOI'MFN7 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail contains business -confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, electronic storage or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, attaching the original message, and delete the original message from your computer, and any network to which your computer is connected. Thank you. 1 PARFET STORAGE (Parfet Storage, LLC) PLANNED BUILDING GROUP City of Wheat Ridge — Planning Commission April 21, 2016 ELINE k 1 a p 1,7 ,r ow - Z41 06/02/2016 Representing the Applicant ► Noah Nemmers — Baseline Engineering Corp. ► Greg Herbers — Parfet Storage, LLC ► Alan McKinster — Parfet Storage, LLC Staff Concerns Update Met with staff on April 20th to discuss concerns related to Architecture, Drive Aisle Widths, Landscaping, and 50th Ave ROW Dedication. The applicant agreed to reflect the 20' of ROW for 501h on all plans. ROW dedication will be required when Lot 2 develops as well as street construction, or cash in lieu for curb, gutter, and sidewalk. Pond improvements will be modified to remove any future conflict with the ROW dedication. 1 Staff Concerns Update o In regard to the Architecture we hope to demonstrate our substantial compliance with the Criteria and continue to work with staff on refinements. o We have analyzed all the drive aisles. Requesting the commissions feedback on the current proposal and a continuance to allow us the time needed to refine the plans where necessary in order to gain staff support in advance of a May 19th hearing for a final _decision. Facade Design and Materials Section 4.2.A — Facade Design Fa4ade detail includes both color and texture differences as well as articulation by way of a 1 foot office that does carry up through the roof line. This will be amended for clarification on the final set. This meets the ASDM elements required. The 1 foot offset meets the requirement within the 100 liner feet required per the ASDM. , The treatments are intended to embellish the street facing elevation in accordance with the ASDM. , The level of fa4ade detail shown was prepared based on the PBG requirements outlined in the checklist for reference to both color and material. 06/02/2016 Site Location Facade Design and Materials Section 4.2.B — Materials Primary materials reflect 40% hard coat stucco in accordance with Section 4.2.6. The stucco would begin above the foundation and not be in direct contact with the adjacent ground. r Secondary Materials include a combination of corrugated metal panels, wood accent trim, and spandral glass. These do not exceed the 60% threshold and are accurately depicted. The glazing reflected on the elevations meets the 1S% transparency and gives the appearance of windows but provides no security risk to the tenants that would occupy the units backing to Parfet Street. All materials used are noted as allowed per the ASDM. 2 Parfet Building Elevations .u. ,. BU0LM0 A - EAST (FRO?M ELEVATION BUEDQTO A - WW (REAR) ELEVATION Looking easterly at proposed front building elevation Aisle Widths P Southern and Eastern Drive aisles used for Fire Emergency Vehicle Access are 24' wide in accordance with IFC and AFPD requirements and have been approved as fire lines. Initial design proposed 20 foot interior drive lanes for private access to the storage units. This was widened to 22 feet to meet the City's minimum requirement based on the initial comments we received. o Since these are private access lanes the owner/operator accepts the risks involved and all building corners are to be constructed with steel bollards for protection. The largest rental truck available to the consumer is 26 feet. We have analyzed a 30 foot box truck can maneuver all turns with no conflicts at a speed of 5 MPH. 06/02/2016 3 Property's fit with the neighboring uses r The site's use is in accordance with the I -E Zoning and staff has agreed that the use poses no significant impact to City services and is a benefit to local businesses that can store files and equipment off-site. The proposed landscaping is in accordance with the City requirements. Access to a dumpster trash enclosure would be a detriment to the neighborhood and the business as it would encourage tenant to dispose of unwanted goods rather than recycle/ re -sure/ and or donation options. 06/02/2016 PBG Approval Criteria (Section 26-116.D.3) 1. The proposed plan complies with the zoning and development code and is not contrary to the general welfare of the immediate neighborhood and economic prosperity of the city. Use is allowed and fits within the neighboring Industrial uses. Use does not pose an impact to City services. Solh Avenue Dedication to occur with Lot 2 as agreed. 2. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual (ASDM). Material percentages and durability requirements of the ASDM are being adhered to while also meeting the security needs of the business. Private Drive Aisles meet the City code requirements and work with the intended use. 21 city Wheaort ,gge CommuNnY DEVELOPMENT Case No. PBG-15-01/Parfet Street Storage Continuance from April 21, 2016 A request for approval of a Planned Building Group on property zoned Industrial -Employment (I -G) at 5130 Parfet Street Phoning(? unu,+,wn Nny 19.21116 What does a PBC do? It is a site plan review which permits multiple buildings on a single lot. It addresses development design such as building placement and site circulation. Itaddresses building architecture It addresses lighting impacts. It addresses buffering for adjacent uses. What does a PBG not do? It does not change the zonfim It does not change the permitted uses It does not dictate setbacks It does not dictate lot coverage It does not address impacts such as noise Aerial photo Aerial photo Zoning Map � Site i -PID MView looking �q northeast across the site.0 91,1Wz 1 View north on Parfet Street View looking east down drive aisle View looking east at outdoor storage area View looking west from 501h at south end of site What has occurred since the April 21 continuance? • A list of Commissioner Olun's concerns were provided to the applicant • The applicants' agreed to a right-of-way reservation for future View looking construction of 50°' Avenue — designated on civil docs and note was west train 5011, added to front sheet at south end of Drainage plan was modified to move pond out of r -o -w reservation site The internal drive aisles have not been increased in width to 25% however, the applicant's offer a restriction of 17' long trucks with sign at the entrance • Modifications nvere made to the landscape plan except species are still not specified • No changes to PBG layout, photometric and building elevation sheets • Staff recommended again that an architect be hired to analysis the architecture and provide a perspective drawing Applicant's request: Approval of PBG with revised sheets with the following conditions: • Cmnmercial vehicles be limited to I T in length and this be signed at the entrance • Architecture and building elevations be prepared by a licensed architect for the building permit submittal • Revisions made to landscaping and lighting prior to building permit submittal Staffs recommendation: Denial for the following reasons: • Inability of staff to monitor truck sizes into the site and impact on Parfet • Circulation and interior aisle widths are substandard to industry standards • Landscaping does not include species designation • Building architecture — questionable facade detail and articulation • Materials — do they meet minimums for primary and secondary materials? • Umcillingness of applicant to hire an architect to help resoh c the former tivo issuLs PUBLIC HEARING ROSTER CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION May 19, 2016 Case No. PBG -15-01: an application filed by Parfet Storage for approval of a Planned Building Group to allow six proposed storage buildings and the existing office/home to be used as an office/home for the site manager for the property located at 5130 Parfet Street. *Continuance from April 21, 2016 Meeting* (Please print) Name Address In Favor/Opposed Meredith Reckert From: Noah Nemmers <noah@baselinecorp.com> Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 9:01 AM To: Meredith Reckert Cc: Greg & Angel Herbers (gaherbers@q.com); Meredith Reckert; Dave Brossman Subject: RE: PC Attachments: RE: PC report Meredith, I just got off the phone with Greg when I saw your email. We would like you to re -consider a recommendation of approval with the following conditions: - Commercial Vehicles can be limited to 17 feet in length (to address the 22' drive aisle concern) - Final Architecture and Elevations will be prepared by a licensed architect meeting all City Design Criteria. - Final revisions will be made to the Landscape and Lighting addressing any items not meeting City Design Criteria and Scott Ohms comments from previous hearing. - Final PBG and Civil Plans to incorporate Language (verbatim) as provided by Dave Brossman regarding future ROW reservation and W. 501h Ave Public Improvements. We feel that the City has not provided the clarification we asked for from my email on the 26th and did not respond to our request to meet once more. We feel that we have responded appropriately and are accepting of any comments that are substantiated by the City Code or the Design Criteria. Please reconsider your recommendation and continue to work with us on appropriate final changes as noted above in the conditions. Your consideration is appreciated here and with the ROW issue being resolved we hope the City would be willing to work with us to gain approaval. Regards, NOAH NEMMERS, P.E. I Civil Engineering Manager, Golden Baseline Engineering, Planning, & Surveying 11950 Ford Street I Golden, CO 80401 1 Phone: 303.940.9966 x 207 Cell: 303.482.7712 1 Fax: 303.940.9959 1 www.baselinecorp.com From: Meredith Reckert [ ma i Ito: m reckert(cbci.wheatridge. co. us] Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 8:37 AM To: Noah Nemmers Subject: PC With regard to the Planning Commission meeting next week, I will be giving a recommendation of denial. Of coarse, that's up to discussion with Planning Commission. Is it okay if I include your email responding to some of the issues discussed at the previous hearing? Meredith Reckert, AICP Senior Planner 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Office Phone: 303-235-2848 FAX: 303-235-2857 www.ci.wheatridge.co.us City olr Wheat Re CommuNITY I7f VE1of'A rNi CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail contains business -confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, electronic storage or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, attaching the original message, and delete the original message from your computer, and any network to which your computer is connected. Thank you. City of' W heat j�j, (jge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Memorandum TO: Planning Commission FROM: Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner DATE: May 12, 2016 SUBJECT: Continuance of Case No. PBG-15-01/Parfet Storage At their April 16, 2016, meeting Planning Commission considered a request for approval of a Planned Building Group plan for property located at 5130 Parfet Street. Upon recommendation of staff, this case was continued until May 19, 2016. In the April 16 Planning Commission report (Exhibit 1, April 21 staff report), Staff had given a recommendation of denial for the following reasons: The intent and purpose of a Planning Building Group "to promote better overall utilization of a site by promoting improved vehicular and pedestrian circulation and access, more efficient layout of parking and a better overall landscape and architectural design scheme for the total site, while at the same time ensuring adequate standards relation to public health, safety, welfare and convenience in the use and occupancy of buildings and facilities" were not being met. • The design proposed did not support the general health, safety and welfare for the neighborhood and the City due to substandard circulation aisle widths compared to industry standards. Insufficient information was shown on the landscape plan. • The goals and objectives of the Transportation portion of the Comprehensive Plan and the Subdivision Regulations were not being met as a right-of-way reservation for West 50th Avenue was not being accommodated by the applicants. • The conflict with an existing detention pond which was located in the future reservation for 50th would be a liability for the City when the future extension of West 50th Avenue would be completed. • It was unclear whether the proposal was in substantial compliance with the ASDM. The building architecture shown in the PBG document lacked detail regarding fagade articulation, fagade detail and materials. These treatments appeared to be "faux" and not thoughtfully integrated into the development. (Exhibit 2, April 21, 2016 Planning Commission minutes) Since the public hearing, the following has occurred: • A copy of Commissioner Ohm's list of specific concerns regarding the landscape plan was provided to the applicants. The applicants agreed to designate a reservation for West 50th Avenue to be constructed if and when the southern portion of the property is developed or when the City implements the completion of 50th Avenue from Miller to Tabor. • The drainage plan was modified to shift the pond out of the 501h Avenue right-of-way dedication area. • Revised PBG plan sheets were submitted which add a note on the front page limiting vehicles to 17' in length with signage at the entrance alerting drivers of the restriction. The maximum vehicle width allowed into the development is not something which can easily be monitored by staff and could have a negative impact on Parfet Street with large trucks maneuvering on the street since they can't get into the site. (Exhibit 3, revised plan sheets) The internal drive aisles are still shown at 22' which do not meet the industry standards of a minimum of 25' with 30' widths at building corners. The east side of building C and west side of Building D are accessible only via a sidewalk with no direct drive aisle access further complicating internal circulation. Modifications to the landscape plan were made in accordance with Commissioner Ohm's comments. However, the applicants are still asking that the plant list be left "loose" regarding species so that the landscaping installed can take advantage of materials available at the time of construction. Plant materials were relocated from the eastern property line and were added to the west side of the access drive to provide buffering for the house and greenhouse to the west. However no landscaping is provided on the south side of the main drive aisle directly adjacent to the house. The Landscape Table is incorrect in that the minimum landscape coverage required is 15%. The revisions include suggested language from Staff regarding the West 50th Avenue r -o- w reservation. • No changes have occurred to the PBG plan sheets regarding the site plan layout, photometric plan and building elevation sheets. • It was again recommended by Staff that a professional architect be brought on -board to provide input as to how the architecture is conforming to the ASDM. A perspective drawing could help both staff and Planning Commission understand how the design and development will be appropriate for the site and the area in general. The applicants opted not to do this. The applicant is requesting that the modified plan be approved with the following conditions: Commercial vehicles accessing the site be limited to 17 feet in length (to address the 22' drive aisle concern) and that this restriction be signed at the entrance to the site. Final architecture and building elevations be prepared by a licensed architect meeting all City design criteria for the building permit application submittal. Final revisions be made to the landscape and lighting sheets addressing any items not meeting City design criteria and Mr. Ohm's comments from the previous hearing. 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff has concluded that the proposed modifications are still not sufficient to meet the intent and purpose of the Planned Building Group plan. There continue to be concerns with interior circulation due to substandard drive aisle widths. Staff still has concerns regarding the architecture being proposed with questionable compliance with the ASDM and suitability for the site. SUGGESTED MOTIONS: Option A: "I move to DENY Case No. PBG -15-01, a request for approval of a planned building group site plan on property zoned I -E at 5130 Parfet Street, for the following reasons: 1. The modifications are still not sufficient to meet the intent and purpose of the Planned Building Group plan. 2. There are still concerns for interior circulation as the plan is substandard to industry standards. 3. There are still concerns regarding the architecture being proposed for questionable compliance with the ASDM and suitability for the site." Option A: "I move to APPROVE Case No. PBG -15-01, a request for approval of a planned building group site plan on property zoned I -E at 5130 Parfet Street, for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3.15 City of �Wheat�idge COMMUNI"IY DEVELOPMENT TO DATE: CASE NO. & NAME: CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT Planning Commission CASE MANAGER: M. Reckert April 21, 2016 Case No. PBG-15-01/Parfet Street storage ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a Planned Building Group to allow multiple structures on a single parcel LOCATION OF REQUEST: 5130 Parfet Street APPLICANT: Parfet Street Storage APPROXIMATE AREA: 3.5 acres PRESENT ZONING: Industrial -Employment (I -E) ENTER INTO RECORD: (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) ZONING ORDINANCE (X) DIGITAL PRESENTATION - . _ S ...� ,140 _ EXHIBIT I Planning Commission PBG-IS-Ol/Parfet Street Storage All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to make a decision regarding this request. I. REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a planned building group (PBG) for property zoned Industrial - Employment (I -E) located at 5130 Parfet Street. Pursuant to Section 26-116 of the code of laws, a PBG site plan is required in all zone districts other than planned development and mixed use districts for properties on which more than one primary structure is proposed. An application for more than four main structures requires approval by the Planning Commission at a public hearing. This case will not require review by City Council. Per Section 26-116.D.2., the decision of Planning Commission is final. Appeals from a Planning Commission ruling shall be to the Jefferson County District Court. A formal neighborhood meeting is not required for this application. II. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION/HISTORY The property is located at 5130 Parfet Street, between Ridge Road and W. 50th Avenue extended in the northwest quadrant of the City. The site consists of one developed parcel (Lot 1 or northern portion), and one undeveloped parcel (Lot 2 or southern portion). While Lot 2 does not have structures on it, it functions as detention for the northern lot. Access into the proposed development site is from Parfet Street. The property also abuts the interior intersection of West 50th Avenue and Oak Street. West 50th dead -ends at the southeast corner of the property. The northern portion of the lot (Lot 1) is developed with a single -story 1135 square foot office building, and a detached garage. Other improvements on the northern portion include parking, landscaping and a small, screened outdoor storage area. (Exhibit 1, Aerial Photo) Lot 2 is located to the south of Lot 1 and is undeveloped. Lot 1 is relatively flat and connects to Lot 2 through a steep and narrow sliver of land. Lot 2 has a considerable grade change with an estimated 13% grade at certain points. Both lots are under common ownership and equal approximately 3.5 acres in area. Surrounding properties include a variety of land uses and zoning. To the west is a transmission substation which is zoned A-1. Abutting the property to the southwest are three parcels (5120, 5110, and 5006 Parfet Street) all zoned Agriculture -One (A-1) with single family, greenhouse and farming uses. To the north and east of the property are developments zoned PID, which have a variety of office/warehouse and manufacturing uses. The property south of Lot 2 is an undeveloped parcel zoned Planned Commercial Development (PCD). (Exhibit 2, Zoning map) The subject property was rezoned from Planned Industrial Development (PID) and Agricultural -One (A-1) to Industrial -Employment (I -E) pursuant to Case No. WZ-14-15. The property was previously used as an electrical contractor's office and storage yard. (Exhibit 3, site photos) Planning Commission PBG-I5-DI/Parfet Street Storage 2 . III. PROPOSED PBG SITE PLAN A planned building group entails site plan review for a parcel with more than one primary structure. Pursuant to Section 26-116.A., the purpose of a PBG is "to promote better overall utilization of a site by promoting improved vehicular and pedestrian circulation and access, more efficient layout of parking and a better overall landscape and architectural design scheme for the total site, while at the same time ensuring adequate standards relation to public health, safety, welfare and convenience in the use and occupancy of buildings and facilities". (Exhi.bit. 4, Reduced copy of PBG) The applicant is proposing to develop the northern portion of the property into a six -building self - storage facility with an office/residence. No development on the south side will occur at this time except for drainage improvements required to accommodate the storage facility's storm water runoff. The original residential building in the interior of the site is proposed to serve as an office and the property manager's residence. The front building (building A) has a 10' build -to line from Parfet Street which is consistent with the standards in the I -E zone district. A 5' setback is provided from the northern property line. Access drive and interior aisle widths Primary access is provided by a curb cut onto Parfet Street which extends to the east into the property. It intersects another major drive aisle east of the office structure. Both of these drive aisles are 24' in width and have been approved by AFPD as fire lanes. Other interior access between buildings is 22' which, in staff's opinion, are too narrow for general circulation around the storage buildings. The City does not have a minimum aisle width for this particular use; however, our research has shown that at a minimum the industry standard is 25'. Many Denver metro municipalities require 30' or more for interior drive aisles for self -storage development. Theses wider widths are required to allow for safe maneuvering of moving truck, often by drivers with infrequent experience driving such vehicles. Access into the site from Parfet Street is controlled by the use of an electronic gate. The gate is inset 40' from Parfet Street so that vehicles have room to pull off the street as they wait for the gate to open. West 50a' Avenue extending east from Miller Street dead -ends at the southeast corner of the property. The City is requesting a dedication of 20' for extension of 50a' across the southern boundary of the property. Section 26-412 of the Subdivision Regulations requires that "streets shall conform to the requirements set forth in the subdivision regulations, the comprehensive plan, the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan and the Streetscape Design Manual of the City of Wheat Ridge." That dedication would be accomplished by separated instrument. Street construction would occur when Lot 2 develops. See additional discussion further in Section III. of this report. Landscaping Landscaped coverage on the property is indicated at 19% where 10% is required in the I -E zone district. The majority of the landscaped/open space coverage occurs along Parfet, around the office and along the eastern property line. While quantities have been met, exact species have not been identified. Instead the applicant has included a plant list from which plant species can be selected at the time of building permit. Building architecture The building architecture shown on sheets 4 — 9 does not comply with the Heavy Commercial/Industrial design standards specified in the Architectural and Site Design Manual Planning Commission PBG-15-01/Parfet Street Storage (ASDM). These substandard items include facade detail, facade articulation, materials, and transparency. Even though the facades on building A are embellished, the standards specified in the ASDM are not being met. The following are excerpts from the ASDM. A. FACADE DESIGN Design Principle: Buildings serving heavy commercial and light industrial uses should include variation and human -scaled components to prevent monotonous and two-dimensional design and to contribute to the character of the community. Section 4.2.A. Design Standard: FaVade Detail: Each facade shall incorporate at least two of the following elements: reveals, belt courses, cornices, deep overhangs architectural repeating elements of at least 1' in depth, recessed windows, color and /texture differences. Section 4.2.A. Design Standard: Facade Articulation: Each facade shall have at least one variation in plan depth, a minimum one foot in depth for every 100 linear feet of the length of the facade such as recessed entries, recess windows and/or storefronts, offsets in the facade including columns, pilasters, protruding bays, reveals, etc. With regard to facade detail and articulation, the elements shown appear to be "faux" in nature and have not been thoughtfully integrated into a comprehensive design. An example of this is the F facade break that is not carried up into the roof line. B. MATERIALS Design Principle: Buildings should utilize high-quality, durable materials that provide variation and visual interest. Section 4.2.13. Design standards: Materials Primary materials: must comprise 40% of the facade and must be one of the following materials: brick, stone, textured, colored concrete block or hard coat stucco. Secondary materials: may not exceed 60% of the facade to include: smooth -faced CMU, EIFS, metal panels or articulated concrete panels. The elevation of building A is shown has having 40% hard coat stucco and 60% metal or other material with 15% transparency but these numbers don't seem accurate nor are they accurately represented on the plan set. Staff has concerns with stucco being utilized adjacent to the ground and potential concerns for long-term durability. The rest of the buildings on the site are composed of metal with wood trim. No accommodation has been made for trash collection on the property. Detention pond and Right -of -Way for West 501h Avenue In 2009, the City adopted Envision Wheat Ridge as its Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan is a document that among other things, acts a tool for guiding development and establishing land use policies Planning Commission PBG-15-01/Parfet Street Storage 4 One of the major components of the plan is Transportation. The Transportation Structure Plan identifies targeted areas for future transportation -related improvements. These improvements focus on improving transportation options and connectivity for all modes of transportation. The plan identifies West 50th Avenue as a proposed roadway from Kipling Street on the east extending to Ward Road on the west. This connection is intended to provide an adequate transportation grid needed to serve the northwest portion of Wheat Ridge. w The RTD Gold Line commuter railway lies five hundred (500) feet north of the subject property, and there are two rail stations located within about a half -mile of the subject property in Arvada and at theWard Road Station in Wheat Ridge. The Gold Line is scheduled to be open for service this year and upon its opening the importance of the W. 50th connection to the City's transportation grid will become very apparent: • The future W. 50th Avenue will serve as a collector street and requires approximately 60 feet of Right -of -Way to construct to current standards. Planning Commission PBG-I5-01/Parfet Street Storage 5 • To meet the City's current roadway design standard for a collector street it will necessitate a twenty (20) foot strip of Right -of -Way (ROW) dedication along the south line of the subject property. • The owners of the subject property were made aware of the ROW dedication requirement during the Pre -Application meeting held with City staff on April 16, 2015. This was reiterated to the applicants subsequent to the pre -application as follows: • The 20' strip will need to be dedicated but the construction of the street would not be required with the current development proposal on Lot 1 (the northerly lot). • W. 50th Avenue improvements would not be required with development of Lot 1, but rather construction of these improvements would occur upon development of the southerly Lot 2 (development of Lot 2 is currently referred to as "Phase II" by the owners). • If drainage modifications are necessary to accommodate the current development, the cost of the design and construction falls back to the developer. Detention Pond Reconstruction An existing stormwater detention pond constructed during a smaller, prior project currently encroaches about five feet into the twenty foot strip of proposed ROW dedication. The civil engineering documents for the current application state that: • The existing detention pond is inadequate in size and must be enlarged to accommodate the current project. • The enlargement design of the existing pond includes regrading along the south side of the pond, creating a situation whereby the City must redesign, reconstruct, and re -certify, a privately -owned detention pond in order to complete the future W. 50th Avenue connection. In order to avoid having a private detention pond within public ROW, Public Works has required the pond be regraded in a manner that relocates the south berm of the pond five (5) feet north of the current design. Moving the pond five feet north allows most of the existing pond area to be used in the redesign, while keeping its final location outside of the 20' strip of proposed W. 50th Avenue ROW. The property owners have indicated that they are not will to comply with this requirement, resulting in an encumbrance to a public ROW by a private detention pond. Drainage report The drainage plan for the site does not adequately accommodate the proposed improvements. The proposed drive between Lot 1 and 2 is very steep with approximately a 12% grade. The westerly swale as designed will be prone to erosion. Staff has requested additional erosion control measures to stabilize this area. IV. PLANNED BUILDING GROUP CRITERIA Planning Commission PBG-15-01/Parfet Street Storage 6 In order to approve a planned building group application, the Planning Commission shall consider the criteria listed in Section 26-116.D.3. of the city code. Staff provides the following review and analysis of the criteria: 1. The proposed plan complies with the zoning and development code and is not contrary to the general welfare of the immediate neighborhood and economic prosperity of the city. While the use of the property for self -storage may be appropriate at this location, the design proposed does not provide a benefit to the general health, safety and welfare for either the neighborhood or the northwest portion of the City. The self -storage use, in general, generates minimal tax so there is not a substantial economic benefit. If the dedication for West 50'h Avenue does not occur, the goals and objectives of the Transportation portion of the Comprehensive Plan and Subdivision Regulations are not promoted. Further, the conflict with the existing detention pond will be a liability for the City's when the extension of West 501h Avenue is completed. Staff finds that this criterion has not been met. 2. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual (ASDM). The application is not in substantial compliance with the standards set forth in the ASDM with regard to architecture. The architecture of the buildings has not been thoughtfully designed with cohesiveness that results in a benefit to the area. Specific examples include the use of materials which have questionable long term durability and the negative aesthetics of "faux" architectural treatments. There are also concerns from staff regarding the drive aisle widths on-site. The 22' -wide aisle widths are sub -industry standards and no allowances are made for larger turning radii around buildings. Staff finds that this criterion has not been met. V. AGENCY REFERRALS All affected service agencies were contacted regarding their ability to serve the property. The developer will be responsible for any needed upgrades to accommodate the proposed development. Specific referral responses follow. Arvada Fire Protection District: Can serve the property from the 24' wide drive aisles running from Parfet along the southern portion of the property and on the east side of the office. Valley Water District: Can serve. Has a concern about grade issues if and when Lot 2 develops. Wheat Ridge Economic Development: Has indicated that while the storage facility is probably a good use of the property, the elevations on the buildings with frontage need to be more aesthetically appealing. The drive aisles appear inadequate in width for larger vehicles. Planning Commission PBG-15-01/Parfet Street Storage 7 Wheat Ridge Public Works: Has commented regarding traffic and drainage. These comments were detailed in Section III.of this report. Xcel Energy: Can serve. VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff concludes that the application does not support the general health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood and City and is not in compliance with requirements of the ASDM. Having found the application is in conflict with the goals of the Transportation Structure Plan and Subdivision Regulations, Staff recommends denial of the planned building group with conditions listed below. VII. SUGGESTED MOTIONS: Option A: "I move to DENY Case No. PBG -15-01, a request for approval of a planned building group site plan on property zoned I -E at 5130 Parfet Street, for the following reasons: 1. The design proposed does not support the general health, safety and welfare for the neighborhood and the City. 2. The goals and objectives of the Transportation portion of the Comprehensive Plan and the Subdivision Regulations are not being met. 3. The conflict with the existing detention pond will be a liability for the City's when the extension of West 50'' Avenue is completed. 4. The proposal is not in substantial compliance with the ASDM." Option B: "I move to APPROVE Case No. PBG -15-01, a request for approval of a planned building group site plan on property zoned I -E at 5130 Parfet Street, for the following reasons: 1. 2." Planning Commission PBG-15-01/Parfet Street Storage 8 Exhibit 1 — Aerial Photo Planning Commission PBG-15-O1/Paifet Street Storage Exhibit 2 — Zoning Map P1O-,,G , . 57TH VE v; C) d SPS A Planning Commission PBG-15-01/Parfet Street Storage 10 Exhibit 3 — Site Photos Looking north on Parfet Street — property on the right Looking northeast across the property Planning Commission PBG-15-01/Paifet Street Storage 1 1 Access aisle into property from Parfet — office on the left Storage area east of the office Planning Commission PBG-15-01/Parfet Street Storage 12 Planning Commission PBG-15-01/Parfet Street Storage Looking west where 50th Avenue dead -ends at the SE corner of the property Looking west toward detention area on Lot 2 13 Exhibit 4 - PBG plan Planning Commission PBG-I5-01/Parfet Street Storage 14 PARFET STREET MINI STORAGE PLANNED BUILDING GROUP AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE DECLARATION OF PLANNED BUILDING GROUP WHEREAS, PARFET STORAGE LLC HAVE SUBMITTED A PLANNED BUILDING GROUP PLAN FOR THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE'S APPROVAL PURSUARi TO WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS, FOR THE LAND AREA LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS InT 1 aF PAaTT PAnk TRACT 2 REPEAT . SW 1/4 OF SECTION 1fi TOWNa+IP 3 SOUTH RANGE 69 WEST OF PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN. CITY An WHEREAS, THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE HAS APPROVED SAID PLAN ON NOW, THEREFORE, UPON FINAL APPROVAL OF THE PLANNED BUILDING GROUP BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, THIS DECLARATION IS NOTICE TO PROSPECTIVE PURCHASERS OF THE LAND AREA AND TO ALL OTHERS THAT IT IS THE SUBJECT OF A PLANNED BURRING GROUP AND THAT SAID PLAN AND THE ORDINANCES RELATING THRETO ARE BINDING ON SUBSEQUENT PURCHASERS, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS UNLESS THE PLAN IS ABANONED, AMENDED OR WITHDRAWN IN WRITING AND DULY RECORDED AND SHALL LIMIT THE CONSTRUCTION, USE AND OPERATION OF ALL LAND AND STRUCTURES INCLUDED WWTHIN SUCH PLANS TO ALL CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS SET FORTH IN SUCH PLANS AND ORDINANCES OWNER: PARFET STORAGE, LLC BY GREGORY A HERBERS AS MEMBER/MANAGER STATE OF COLORADO ) ) 65 COUNTY OF JEFFERSON ) THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS _ DAY OF A.D. 20_ BY WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: NOTARY PUBUC CITY CERTIFICATION APPROVED THIS _ DAY OF _ BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE ATTEST CITY CLERK MAYOR DIRLGIUK Of PUBLIC WORKS COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDERS CERTIFICATE STATE OF COLORADO )SS COUNTY OF JEFFERSON ) I HERBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER OF JEFFERSON COUNTY AT GOLDEN, COLORADO, AT O'CLOCK _.M. ON THE _ DAY OF A.D., IN BOOK - PAGE RECEPTION NO. JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER BY: DEPUTY PLANNING COMMMON CERTIFICATION APPROVED THIS _ DAY OF _ BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION. CHAIRPERSON SURVEYOR'S CERTMCATE I, ROBERT M. HAYDEN DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARY OF eABEE'LSTREET MR STORAGE WAS MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE INFORMATION AND BELIEF, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE COLORADO STATUES, CURRENT REVISED EDITION AS AMENDED, THE ACCOMPANYING PLAN ACCURATELY REPRESENTS SAID SURVEY. SURVEYORS SEAL SIGNATURE ROBERT M. HAYDEN, L.S. 27268 Know what's below. Call before you dig. LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO 5130 PARFET STREET VICINITY MAP SCALE 1' = 1000' SITE BENCHMARK THE BENCHMARK USED FOR THIS SITE IS NGS 12409, LOCATED AT N=1713256.48, E_ 3109706.48 (NAD63)/ N= 71368&67, E= 110490.93 (CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE DATUM), WITH AT SECTION CORNER DESCRIPTION OF E 1/4, S16 WHICH IS A 3-1/4' ALUMINUM CAP (LS 23524)IN THE CONCRETE SIDEWALK WITH AN ELEVATION= 5393.92 NOM 1. FENCING SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 26-603 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 2. LANDSCAPING SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 26-502 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 3. PARKING SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 26-501 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 4. SITE AND BUILDING LIGHTING SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 26-503 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 5. SIGNAGE SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH ARTICLE NI OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 6. THE BUILDING AND DESIGN STANDARDS WILL FOLLOW THE ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE DESIGN MANUAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION: THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS CONSIST OF MINI -WAREHOUSE STORAGE UNITS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO THE EXISTING RESIDENCE TO CONVERT IT TO RESIDENCE/ OFFICE SPACE ACCESS TO THE SITE WILL BE OFF OF PARFET STREET AND A PRIVATE DRIVE. IMPROVEMENTS WALL CONSIST OF BUILDING CONSTRUCTION, PAVED ACCESS DRIVES AND ASSOCIATED LANDSCAPING. ARCHITECTURAL- ALL BUILDINGS TO BE CORRUGATED METAL CLAD WITH WOOD ACCENTS IN NATURAL EARTH TONE COLORS. HOURS OF OPERATION ARE FROM 6 AM - 9 PM : MONDAY -SUNDAY THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS FOR THE NORTHERN LOT ONLY AND THAT PRIOR TO ANY SITE DEVELOPMENT ON THE SOUTH. A SITE PLAN PROCESS WILL BE REWIRED. CASE HISTORY; Wz-12-02 WZ-03-06 MS -02-07 WZ-10-08 MS -10-D4 WZ-14-15 PBG -15-01 WA -16-02 APPLICANT PARFET STORAGE, LLC. 14995 FOOTHILLS ROAD GOLDEN, CO 80401 CONTACT: GREG HERBERS 303.717.0378 . BASELINE 1CI">i >950 FORD EGINE>3R BASELINE ENGINEERING Engineering- Planning - Surveying ��, 00 80401 CONTACT: NOAH NEMMERS, P.E. 303.940.9966 ARCHITBCf ,MAKO MAKO STEEL BUILDINGS S T E E L 5650 EL CAMINO REAL #100 CARLSBAD, CA 92006 760.448.1760 MMaPALTfY RIDGE RO _ 7500 W. 29TH AVENUE W heat �ge WHEAT RIDGE, `" 60033 3�0�3.2�34.5�900p� -.SITE PLAN - SQUARE FEET ACRES PERCENTAGE i5LE a1IC Xcel Energy XCEL ENERGY STOU3B022; "°E C7 _ 37.0% l 23,507 SF 0.54 303.57. 33(16 TOTAL OPEN SPACE/LANDSCAPING. FM PROTECTION 19.0% ARVADA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 50TH AVE 50TH AVE - RESIDENCE AREA: - PROJECT LOCATION ` NTEf STATE 70 FRONTAG RD I PERCENTAGE NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL SPACES: %0 I I 1 2 / NUMBER OF HANDICAP SPACES 1 1 1D0% rT-T N 44TH AVE I VICINITY MAP SCALE 1' = 1000' SITE BENCHMARK THE BENCHMARK USED FOR THIS SITE IS NGS 12409, LOCATED AT N=1713256.48, E_ 3109706.48 (NAD63)/ N= 71368&67, E= 110490.93 (CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE DATUM), WITH AT SECTION CORNER DESCRIPTION OF E 1/4, S16 WHICH IS A 3-1/4' ALUMINUM CAP (LS 23524)IN THE CONCRETE SIDEWALK WITH AN ELEVATION= 5393.92 NOM 1. FENCING SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 26-603 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 2. LANDSCAPING SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 26-502 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 3. PARKING SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 26-501 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 4. SITE AND BUILDING LIGHTING SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 26-503 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 5. SIGNAGE SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH ARTICLE NI OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 6. THE BUILDING AND DESIGN STANDARDS WILL FOLLOW THE ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE DESIGN MANUAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION: THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS CONSIST OF MINI -WAREHOUSE STORAGE UNITS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO THE EXISTING RESIDENCE TO CONVERT IT TO RESIDENCE/ OFFICE SPACE ACCESS TO THE SITE WILL BE OFF OF PARFET STREET AND A PRIVATE DRIVE. IMPROVEMENTS WALL CONSIST OF BUILDING CONSTRUCTION, PAVED ACCESS DRIVES AND ASSOCIATED LANDSCAPING. ARCHITECTURAL- ALL BUILDINGS TO BE CORRUGATED METAL CLAD WITH WOOD ACCENTS IN NATURAL EARTH TONE COLORS. HOURS OF OPERATION ARE FROM 6 AM - 9 PM : MONDAY -SUNDAY THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS FOR THE NORTHERN LOT ONLY AND THAT PRIOR TO ANY SITE DEVELOPMENT ON THE SOUTH. A SITE PLAN PROCESS WILL BE REWIRED. CASE HISTORY; Wz-12-02 WZ-03-06 MS -02-07 WZ-10-08 MS -10-D4 WZ-14-15 PBG -15-01 WA -16-02 APPLICANT PARFET STORAGE, LLC. 14995 FOOTHILLS ROAD GOLDEN, CO 80401 CONTACT: GREG HERBERS 303.717.0378 . BASELINE 1CI">i >950 FORD EGINE>3R BASELINE ENGINEERING Engineering- Planning - Surveying ��, 00 80401 CONTACT: NOAH NEMMERS, P.E. 303.940.9966 ARCHITBCf ,MAKO MAKO STEEL BUILDINGS S T E E L 5650 EL CAMINO REAL #100 CARLSBAD, CA 92006 760.448.1760 MMaPALTfY SHEET INDEX CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Eily oI 7500 W. 29TH AVENUE W heat �ge WHEAT RIDGE, `" 60033 3�0�3.2�34.5�900p� -.SITE PLAN - SQUARE FEET ACRES PERCENTAGE i5LE a1IC Xcel Energy XCEL ENERGY STOU3B022; "°E C7 D ENVE23 37.0% CONTACT: DONNA GEORGE 23,507 SF 0.54 303.57. 33(16 TOTAL OPEN SPACE/LANDSCAPING. FM PROTECTION 19.0% ARVADA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT "IS 7903 ALLISON WAY RESIDENCE AREA: ARVADA, 00 80005 303.424.3012 SHEET INDEX SITE DATA TABLE SHEET TITLE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 1 IN PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION, TRACT 2 REPEAT #2, FOR NORTHERN LOT ONLY ZONE DISTRICT: I -E INDUSTRIAL -EMPLOYMENT - C2 -.SITE PLAN - SQUARE FEET ACRES PERCENTAGE TOTAL AREA OF PROPERTY: 53,155 SF 1.22 100% TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE 19,720 SF 0.45 37.0% TOTAL PARKING/DRIVE COVERAGE 23,507 SF 0.54 44.0% TOTAL OPEN SPACE/LANDSCAPING. 9,928 ".i 0.23 19.0% OFFICE AREA: "IS _ _ ONG RESIDENCE AREA: 867 S BUILDING HEIGHT: 50J-0' (ALLOWED), 9--4' (PROPOSED), 25-0' (EXISTING) PARKING SPACES REWIRED PROVIDED PERCENTAGE NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL SPACES: 2 2 100% NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES 1 2 2001E NUMBER OF HANDICAP SPACES 1 1 1D0% SHEET INDEX SHEET NO. SHEET TITLE CI COVER _ - C2 -.SITE PLAN - _ - C3 LANDSCAPE PUN _ Al (BUILDING A ELEVATIONS - A2 -- 'BUILDING B ELEVATIONS A3 'BUILDING C ELEVATONS _ 4 0 ELEVATIONS _ A5 _BUILDING 'BUILDING E ELEVATIONS A_6 BUILDING F ELEVATIONS - - _E1 '.PHOTOMETRIC SITE PUN _- _ _ ONG DRAINAGE PUN __. F5IS rw amn wrz EC 5/9/15 C032M mina wrE 3208-s+ Pno•. W.a.a C1 PARFET STREET MINI STORAGE PLANNED BUILDING GROUP AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO ------- Q0,----_--_ -------------1 PROPOSED EMERGENCY 54' I -� EAS�ENT �. �IX FIRE HYDRANT (TYP.) 35 VALLEY WATER R15' R15'�y/ .� n2,55276 DISTRICT ESMT. SHALLOW / 222' 106.570.59 ° - (REC. NO. 76096490) STORAGE N=12.551.88 z,.c 5' BLDG. SETBACK UNITS 6,810.60 MINIMUM OF 5 TREES ALONG S 89'49'15' E (325.01') _ - THE FRONTAGE DECIDUOUS OR EVERGREEN 10' BLDG SETBACK -� 10' UTIUTY_ ESMT. EX UTILITY POLE 50- R - O.W. 0'R.O.W. I Y g 7PROPOSED $TONE MONUMENT (RE ARCH) I I��I 15' SIGHT 23.1 TRIANGLE < I y p 04 ° oZ oT z 0 1 I j I PROPOSED EMERGENCY ..., 5' U71UTY ESMT. 9VWNNG.E 3,8755E ACCESS 20' JZ �m 8T 20' 16 APPROVED PLANS BACK TO ITS ORIGINAL STATE W ". ARCH) 116 .(•_ 24' °o i RS, R50'I 11 GATE ARCH) of ra 107.4' PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT V' y�20 9' 70' PROPOSED BUILDING CONST. 2.612 SY- ASPHALT PAVEMENT o I20' CLEAR CREEK WATER & V� �1fi 22 R50 CE ACE PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SANITARY SEWER ESMT. 30 22' 40•--'-�-'-22' JO' V 7.3� 0 t2 30'-��--22'-�j^-30' 24' 11' I (REG N0. 80045919) RIGHT OF WAY UNE -- - LOT UNE C a I I_ ___-_-_ - 20' VALLEY WATER _ _ _ " CONST. 80 LF- 3 WIDE CONCRETE m PAN (TYP.) ASPHALT PAWING ASPHALT PAWING - T '' I6• IX EDGE OF ASPHALT _ °r a 5 j IX CURB & GUTTER rm v C2 C2 N.T.S. 0 120' PROPOSED 2' CURB & GUTTER _ 15DRAINAGE ESMT. IX WOOD FENCE I 25' VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ISMT. ` _S o BUILDING A 3,600 SF BUILDING B 3,200 SF BUILDING C 2,400 SF -GAP IN CLEAR -- 1,280 SF amu' -D- 'E 2,400 SF 2,400 SF I (REC. NO. 78096490) V' _ _ I _ _ �� WAS IT 5' UTILITY E511T. N 89'45'15' E (203.33') 10' UTIUTY DI STRICTA ESMT. ° ° CONST. 00 LF-( ACCESS ESMT. 4.__ 1 CONST. 80 LF- 3 CONST. 110 SY- °o°a° 8813.8'°° CONST. ADA UFi (RE: ARCH) o °°8 NIDE CONCRETE PAN (TP.) I I 1 I I - - _ _ MADE CONCRETE PAN (TW.) CONCRETE SIDEWAU( °;11.7; ° __ .6.8' 10' I 1 h °g N=1,712,43276 10.5' INSTALL BOIURDS 8.5' 10.5' / I L13.2' � 12-5- E= 25' 6.5• E=3,106,810.77 i i w E=3,106,531.11 85' (TMP,) 18'-.1.,7.5' I v 10.5' 9'(114.) 3' 3' INSTALL WHEEL 3' L_------.---'-------------- STOP ((TYP.)----- _- -- -_-- CONST. GATE 24.8' (RE ARCH)__.-__- ---__-__--_---____-- ___ __________________1 1----- -------------------._ _---- I I I J*R7 I I I --_ - -: -_S 89'45'15' W (275.00.)— - - --- - _ = _- --- _ RO.5' -- -__ - - - 5' UTILITY X51 W' ESMT. j 1 SITE PLAN C2 C2 rc o; W z 0 1 I I I w LJPROPERTY STRUCT A 6' HIGH SOLID JZ �m 1 APPROVED PLANS BACK TO ITS ORIGINAL STATE W ". CD CE ALONG THE SOUTH PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT ._ � of ra 4. QUANTITIES PROVIDED ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY. PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT UNE C� PROPOSED BUILDING 5. THE MOST CURRENT MUTCD STANDARDS SHALL APPLY FOR PARKING STRIPING. o I20' CLEAR CREEK WATER & PROPOSED LANDSCAPING I CE ACE PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SANITARY SEWER ESMT. 6 � z > 6 z 0 t2 PROPERTY BOUNDARY - DRIVE I (REG N0. 80045919) RIGHT OF WAY UNE -- - LOT UNE C a o I_ ___-_-_ - 20' VALLEY WATER _ _ _ " c m ASPHALT PAWING ASPHALT PAWING - T '' I6• IX EDGE OF ASPHALT o a a DISTRICT ESMT. REC. NO. 83012940) - - - IX CURB & GUTTER rm v C2 C2 N.T.S. r�er4wA� PROPOSED 2' CURB & GUTTER 15DRAINAGE ESMT. IX WOOD FENCE p, o PROPOSED GATE s -GAP IN CLEAR -- - (REC. N0. 201142920)------- V UnUTY ESMT. _ _ I _ _ �� WAS IT 5' UTILITY E511T. N 89'45'15' E (203.33') REC. NO. 2011042920) DI STRICTA ESMT. 4.__ 1 __------------- I I �-__--_____ 5'UTILITY ESMT. I II REC. NO. 2011042920) I_____________________ - -- --- - - -- - - - - - - - _ DRAINAGE ESMT. I I II ^ (REC. NO. 2011042920) g 20' \ (~WATER ESMT. I �61� FUTURE BUILDINGS(UPON AN APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION) ` I \ 1 SITE PLAN C2 C2 N GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 20 40 �+*k au.w e (IN FEET) aimcr nr 1 INCH - 20 FT RIC mP 3208 -SP ano:e i.4+ �m 2 C2 rc o; W z 0 Nom 1. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY ALL IX CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND z 0 � NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF EX CONDITIONS DIFFER FROM WHAT IS SHOWN ON w APPROVED PLANS. JZ �m APPROVED PLANS BACK TO ITS ORIGINAL STATE W ". CD 3. ASPHALT &CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTIONS TO BE REPLACEDEXISTIREPLACEDSHALL MATCH NG PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT ._ � of ra 4. QUANTITIES PROVIDED ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY. PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT C� PROPOSED BUILDING 5. THE MOST CURRENT MUTCD STANDARDS SHALL APPLY FOR PARKING STRIPING. o 6. ALL RADIUS IS 2 FEET UNLESS OTHERVASE NOTED. PROPOSED LANDSCAPING PROPOSED LANDSCAPING 6 � z > 6 z 0 t2 PROPERTY BOUNDARY 66" ®® SS - RIGHT OF WAY UNE -- - LOT UNE C a o ONCRETE ( 3"� PSI CONCRETE— PSIFIBCOC __---_- EASEMENT UNE c m ASPHALT PAWING ASPHALT PAWING - T '' I6• IX EDGE OF ASPHALT o a a -_-_ -- - IX CURB & GUTTER rm v C2 C2 N.T.S. r�er4wA� PROPOSED 2' CURB & GUTTER - - IX WOOD FENCE p, o PROPOSED GATE s N GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 20 40 �+*k au.w e (IN FEET) aimcr nr 1 INCH - 20 FT RIC mP 3208 -SP ano:e i.4+ �m 2 C2 rc o; 3 s. s' z 0 Nom 1. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY ALL IX CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND z 0 � NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF EX CONDITIONS DIFFER FROM WHAT IS SHOWN ON w APPROVED PLANS. 2 CONTRACTOR MUST REPAIR ANY DAMAGE AREAS THAT ARE NOT A PART OF OF THE APPROVED PLANS BACK TO ITS ORIGINAL STATE Lv 3. ASPHALT &CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTIONS TO BE REPLACEDEXISTIREPLACEDSHALL MATCH NG .Qa SECTIONS. of ra 4. QUANTITIES PROVIDED ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY. C� N 5. THE MOST CURRENT MUTCD STANDARDS SHALL APPLY FOR PARKING STRIPING. 6. ALL RADIUS IS 2 FEET UNLESS OTHERVASE NOTED. LLJ lL N 0 t2 N pE LJ Ld C a w ONCRETE ( 3"� PSI CONCRETE— PSIFIBCOC WITHMESH WITH WITH II ASPHALT PAWING ASPHALT PAWING - T '' I6• o a 0 2 3' WIDE CONCRETE PAN v C2 C2 N.T.S. r�er4wA� �o4acr N GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 20 40 �+*k au.w e (IN FEET) aimcr nr 1 INCH - 20 FT RIC mP 3208 -SP ano:e i.4+ �m 2 C2 PARFET STREET MINI STORAGE PLANNED BUILDING GROUP AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO I I I I \ I I� I III 1 TI/i i I, I I \ I It I � / III r /,.• .... \\ 1 I I 25 VALLEY WATER �y DISTRICT ESMT. (REC. I N0. 78096/49D), II `\ 110' *i ESMT. SMT. IIII I \ jl P I li I I I I 1 I I I I I I I II \ \ I I \ I \ \ 120' CIFAR CREEK WATER 3 \ \ \ I SANITARY SEWER ESMT. \\ \ \ \ (REC. NO. BDD45919) `— ,L_� 20' VALLEY WATER _—_—_—___— �� \/ DISTRICT ESMT. (REC. NO. 83012940) — __ \ - / 15' DRAINAGE -----�0 CAP IN CIEAR (REC. NO. !0 1411!) - _ - `- - -- L CREEK WATER r.i A ?5' UTILITY ESMT.- _ - —.mss. _--_—_._ -- 7 WATER I \ WATER ESMT. /I / \ FUTURE BUILDINGS(UPON �,/-�-- AN APPROVAL OF A STE / \ PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION) i 1 LANDSCAPE PLAN C3 C3 I sEcnoN LINE REQUIRED PROPERTY BOUNDARY OPEN SPACE 7,971 SF LOT UNE - - - - - - - EASEMENT UNE ---5124-- EX. MINOR CONTOUR ---5125 IX. MAJOR CONTOUR 5' UTILITY E! E7.- PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR / / PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR FULCROWN.STMED - - � � / / Ij / - - � � - �' � �' ,/ ✓ RED. NO. 2011042920) BBB SPEC OUAIITY 8P 60SNON PINE e'NT: fut CROAK, SiN8:0 EubryrtwF yaWs'f-. P_NeWe ,_� FULL FORM BBB SPEC IXAUTY - - RRERAL HOFEYLOCMT / FULL CROHN, STAID ghua aronatila CKoe1aV GlM {-.-/(RED BAB SPEC OLAUTY DRAINAGE E91L 2011012920) RED POINTE MAPLE ]VEAL FULL FROIYN. STAKED SY^wP_ ­ 14m Acerrupruie l_x FUL FORM NO. GB GINKGO91lOBF. MINI t U,l fAiOAN,SIAID PTI '.—K 1 I x . APt FML FORM RAR SPEC OLANIY CA CHANTKLEER PEAR 21 CAL FML FROWN. STAKED 6eAnn exnbergW w. Rne GbW 'Clw+;ckei 0� RAL FORM 88B SPM OlAlTIY TN IDA NAWINORN 1S CAL. fLALFROYI%_ ED SWI,. APp , rilMeare' GMaepuF • nwMelMnsu TaEa` FIX l FOPAI 886 SPEC. MAUTY RLUEARROWAWIPER 5'M FML CROWN STAKED Jmipevs wpvlifa Blue APgV 868 SPEC GLAUTY N �— II \ I I� I III 1 TI/i i I, I I \ I It I � / III r /,.• .... \\ 1 I I 25 VALLEY WATER �y DISTRICT ESMT. (REC. I N0. 78096/49D), II `\ 110' *i ESMT. SMT. IIII I \ jl P I li I I I I 1 I I I I I I I II \ \ I I \ I \ \ 120' CIFAR CREEK WATER 3 \ \ \ I SANITARY SEWER ESMT. \\ \ \ \ (REC. NO. BDD45919) `— ,L_� 20' VALLEY WATER _—_—_—___— �� \/ DISTRICT ESMT. (REC. NO. 83012940) — __ \ - / 15' DRAINAGE -----�0 CAP IN CIEAR (REC. NO. !0 1411!) - _ - `- - -- L CREEK WATER r.i A ?5' UTILITY ESMT.- _ - —.mss. _--_—_._ -- 7 WATER I \ WATER ESMT. /I / \ FUTURE BUILDINGS(UPON �,/-�-- AN APPROVAL OF A STE / \ PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION) i 1 LANDSCAPE PLAN C3 C3 I sEcnoN LINE REQUIRED PROPERTY BOUNDARY OPEN SPACE 7,971 SF LOT UNE - - - - - - - EASEMENT UNE ---5124-- EX. MINOR CONTOUR ---5125 IX. MAJOR CONTOUR —5124— PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR 5125— PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR * SHADE TREE 0 SHRUBS ROCI( MULCH 2" NATIVE SEED MIX ASPHALT NOTE 1. ALL LANDSCAPED AREA SHALL BE SERVED BY A ZONED, AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. 2. INDIVIDUAL TREE AND SHRUB SPECIES PALL BE ESTABLISHED BY A LANDSCAPE PLAN AND APPROVED BY STAFF WRING THE BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW PROCESS. 3. NON-UVING MATERIAL SHALL BE LIMITED TO 35X NON -LIVING LANDSCAPING PALL NOT EXCEED 35% OF THE TOTAL LANDSCAPED COVERAGE LANDSCAPE TABLE PER Sec 26-502 LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS 'TREES AND SHRUBS TO BE FROM THE SELECTED PLANT UTST NOTED BELOW REQUIRED PROVIDED OPEN SPACE 7,971 SF 8.095 SF MAXIMUM PERCENT LANDSCAPED COVERAGE 35% 19x STREET TREES ' 5 5 ON-STE TREES8 8 ON-SITE SHRUBS' 80 81 SHRUBS 'TREES AND SHRUBS TO BE FROM THE SELECTED PLANT UTST NOTED BELOW PLANT LIST BM DUAN, SYM COMMONIBOTANICAL NAME SIZE REMARKS TREES FULLFOREI CC AG AUTUMK DR411MCE SERV'.CIWIRRY THE. FULCROWN.STMED Vip _Mbbun' _GI me wR ANNpMtier �psdeua`A— 15 TRUNKS BBB SPEC OUAIITY 8P 60SNON PINE e'NT: fut CROAK, SiN8:0 EubryrtwF yaWs'f-. P_NeWe ,_� FULL FORM BBB SPEC IXAUTY IH RRERAL HOFEYLOCMT 2SCAL. FULL CROHN, STAID ghua aronatila CKoe1aV GlM FIALFORM BAB SPEC OLAUTY RP RED POINTE MAPLE ]VEAL FULL FROIYN. STAKED SY^wP_ ­ 14m Acerrupruie l_x FUL FORM 68B SPEC O vlf GB GINKGO91lOBF. MINI t U,l fAiOAN,SIAID PTI '.—K 1 I x . APt FML FORM RAR SPEC OLANIY CA CHANTKLEER PEAR 21 CAL FML FROWN. STAKED 6eAnn exnbergW w. Rne GbW 'Clw+;ckei 0� RAL FORM 88B SPM OlAlTIY TN IDA NAWINORN 1S CAL. fLALFROYI%_ ED SWI,. APp , rilMeare' GMaepuF • nwMelMnsu TaEa` FIX l FOPAI 886 SPEC. MAUTY SHRUBS BM BLUE MLSi SPRFA SGML. SPAONGPFR P" C.w .slbNv++eS FULLFOREI CC SPRING GREEN COMPACT CRANBERRY 5GAL SPACING PER FUN Vip _Mbbun' _GI me wR FULL KIRM DR MYARF 6URNIMG BVSN 5 GAL. SPACING PER FLAN EubryrtwF yaWs'f-. FULL FORM G5 GROW -LOW FRAGRANT S 5GAL SPACING PER PLAN ghua aronatila CKoe1aV FIALFORM MK MIS5 KIM LILAC SGML SPACNG PE_ SY^wP_ ­ 14m FUL FORM PF POIENTKLA GOLOFNGER 5GAL. SPACING@ V 0C PTI '.—K 1 FML FORM RR ROSY GLOW BARBERRY 5GAL SPAONG PER PIAN 6eAnn exnbergW w. Rne GbW RAL FORM SP GOLDFUME SPtliEA SGAL SPACNGPER PINI SWI,. APp , rilMeare' FIX l FOPAI SJ RLUEARROWAWIPER 5'M FML CROWN STAKED Jmipevs wpvlifa Blue APgV 868 SPEC GLAUTY N GRAPHIC SCALE 20 O 20 40 (IN FEET) 1 INCH = 20 FT PARFET STREET MINI STORAGE PLANNED BUILDING GROUP AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LOCATED IN THE SOUTWEST OF SECTION 16, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO -Al I C A\In DnnC TRIM COLOR: RUST BUILDING A - EAST (FRONT) ELEVATION Tout r'r%l nD• DI IQT r yr lAlIAInn1A1C Irl A71mr, (TVP'i BUILDING A - WEST (REAR) ELEVATION SOUTH winnow oma - M HARMAT SrUCOMOCK - 40% IWAiJOTM = 6K 1' BUILDING OFFSET 1' EACH WAY TAN WALL AND ROOF COLOR ON CORNERS RUNNING BOARD AND BATTEN COLOR: BROWN STAIN ALL BOTTOMS HARDCOAT STUCCO COLOR: RUST BUILDING A - ENDWALL ELEVATIONS NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE 5 D 5 10 (IN FEEL) 1 INCH = 5 Ff m PARFET STREET MINI STORAGE PLANNED BUILDING GROUP W ._ AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CTTY OF WHEAT RIDGE " LOCATED IN THE SOUTWEST OF SECTION 16, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, J CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO W LA - Q W MAI I Q ANIF\ DOM' rni„ -AOL COLOR: TAN BUILDING B - EAST (FRONT) ELEVATION BUILDING B - WEST (REAR) ELEVATION BUILDING B - ENDWALL ELEVATIONS GRAPHIC SCAIE 5 0 5 10 (IN FEET) 1 INCH - 5 FT — — --I s¢r 5a it A2 PARFET STREET MINI STORAGE PLANNED BUILDING GROUP AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LOCATED IN THE SOUTWEST OF SECTION 16, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO TRIM COLOR: RUST BUILDING C - WEST (FRONT) ELEVATION BUILDING C - EAST (REAR) ELEVATION DOORS COLOR: TAN BUILDING C - ENDWALL ELEVATIONS 3 O 5 a v W Q Of 0 (n W 2 W O F IJV^!] L Q U W W � z H— w a � a -n 0 U GRAPHIC SCALE 9E —7/11 5 0 5 10 i4 ,� C0720E au�o xwc QN FffT� 7208 Elewtions.a�g 1 INCH = 5 FT a¢r 6 a 11 A3 PARFET STREET MINI STORAGE PLANNED BUILDING GROUP W91 AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Z LOCATED IN THE SOUTWEST OF SECTION 16, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO J W m t/1 - ural I r Akin D/lnr Tnul W COLOR: TAN BUILDING D - EAST (FRONT) ELEVATION 9 ILL o� m� 3 O 5 a FS BUILDING D - WEST (REAR) ELEVATION BUILDING D - ENDWALL ELEVATIONS IN GRAPHIC SCALE six ^� •' ua 5 0 5 10 BEL 5/9/15 A M0. Z03208 (IN FEET) 1 INCH = 5 FT 3208 El—tlm..d, a¢ 7 v 11 A4 PARFET STREET MINI STORAGE PLANNED BUILDING GROUP AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LOCATED IN THE SOUTWEST OF SECTION 16, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO ...— I - ♦.ire nnn[ TOM COLOR: TAN BUILDING E - EAST (FRONT) ELEVATION BUILDING E - WEST (REAR) ELEVATION BUILDING E - ENDWALL ELEVATIONS GRAPHIp 5 0 5 0 aec Jm wn (IN FEET) sa�oe w 1 INCH - 5 FT .... A5 PARFET STREET MINI STORAGE PLANNED BUILDING GROUP AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LOCATED IN THE SOUTWEST OF SECTION 16, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO BUILDING F - SOUTH (FRONT) ELEVATION (WEST HALF) COLOR: TAN BUILDING F - SOUTH (FRONT) ELEVATION (EAST HALF) BUILDING F - NORTH (REAR) ELEVATION (EAST HALF) BUILDING F - ENDWALL ELEVATIONS MATCH LINE I 1 BOARD AND BATTEN COLOR: BROWN STAIN COLOR: RUST 1 a.nc.— --I GRAPHIC SCALE vi 5 0 5 10SIN �1 INCH = 5 Ff m W d o� W_ N MATCH LINE o� d b b b z 5 � 0 o Y m 0 a 1 a.nc.— --I GRAPHIC SCALE vi 5 0 5 10SIN �1 INCH = 5 Ff m E i i PARFET STREET MINI STORAGE PLANNED BUILDING GROUP AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LOCATED IN THE SOUTWEST OF SECTION 16, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, PITY !1F WNFAT RIMT ('OIJNTY OF JFFFERSON• STATE OF COLORADO t.o b.o b.e f.o b.c b.c t.o b.c _.0 b.o 1.0 b.c b.c b.o b.c b.E b.0 b.e b.o b.o b.o b.e b.c b.e b.o bi=\ b c hy.�.a__3.a,. b.c b.o b.o b.c b.o b.o b.e b.l b.o b.o b.o b.o t.o b.o b.c b.o t.o b.c b.o b.c b.c b.0 3.0 b.o t.o b.o t.o t.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b e S o b_c b.c b.t t.o b.a b.o t.o b.2 b.l 5.o b.o 1.0, ��.i b.l tI.P i t.c b.0 b.] b.o bl-o :1 o�a � 4 X2.2 1.? 1.1 I.J ..2 ..2 c.0 :.]� b.6 <.a i.b.o b.e :3.J `/.6EW4E.5-.9 1.E �� a 9 I�1' a.5 t a '•, S.c i.- 1.3I §.6 Iu.e §.z �3'S.] 11.2 Sc I. s;/' b.o bio 1b, r�" k'.z §.] 3.., b.c b s t.? S S.c '• a 'E.s �EW4 6.z II /� ' , EW3' ' 1 l -C JJ i _�_p_ III 1 -/ �.• a.2,.. a.6 a.� II's §�SIIse b.rtz E1' r;i o bl a tj - i i t b.c b.o 9 %{_ t'r�j�J{{ it3 4.e b.l b.o a.o I EW3 : IJEW3 1 EW3 /�. ! DD / 'EW��3x{T. <f-�K�/AA]]77 iF('/�t b.o blC a➢UUILL'ING' yai bi6I 1P9 3 ¢.S .'< E19 6.5 $91,•b^ !C /•I� t 2 b.lil b.l a.0 t.0 a�.2 b.. §.c ily i �%{ Bl'I_CINi: g Ewa yl I,, L. �/ B - 6JILS ^16 Ey' b.J La �O.z t.o b.o �, I I .�\`e LG �b (, 1 5j9 3.e 4. 9 UILO AJC' L ��] I 9 fi.0 b o b. ' Ews i,1a l 4 5 J i f ' a 1 .4b.2 t.0 t_o b o b �9�� z14 9. k7II 5�;� �� / 4 I by �6I E EW3 l b.o b c Ib�G �,�' : 6 I� � I i {�".�r j•.' I"" 6 :zip§1s%',,./2 b.{' I a.o 5.c 4 i d+ Y•+ lEW3 w4.' aE ���, bo ��d t�i S.? � ��e t�i� 1✓ _ �� 6�/ �si.e §.9 `57 t ��• SI, E. i .z� � I y/� '!� 'T=.17 d� �S7:i if r , •� DS, . �5.e l.s 4.c - 5-.� lS. ;.-ham EW3 ;.1 `.z I'^O.zJ t.l a.c .0 --EW3- - - - --- .•- W3 x`.1 .2 / a.. S _ bf � S z 4.z Ja,a` b12 b.: b.c b.z bf4 t.s Y�.s t`4 b.E b.] ?.; 3:5b.4/ b.s b.E b.s ".]'�4; b.�. b.su.9 b.s b_] Lc�b. b.s b.t b.e o.6 b.a �o.�= b., b.c b.l b.l b.1 I t _---t.l b.l 'b i/ b 1 b.l a.l b.l b.z b.2 11 b.l b.1 t.1 t.1 5.2 [.2 b.2 t.z 11.1b.l b.l t.2 `5 0.2 b. %yam, -1--t-:- 0. lb�l�' b.o t.e *t.o b.c b.o b.o b.o b.c b.o b.o t.o b.e t.l b.l b.l .., b.c b.o -0 b.o b.. b.l t -I b.i U.1 b.o b.l b.0 b.l ba b.c�d �:i{,�b�u b.i L.o .oi b.e b.c LAREDO S. J...m k&dul� SERIES LMF.W3.EW4 a... C - 301IDs �,�. sxxacxauow y�'wnv�v�ti M�-�s� r°a�°e�otrsix.ax�mun�,man Mom ms; �,� �• � �► 1 Iicu Ixos.�.m rnemml �� OIP061i116Ni1R141WN �IM6 EfN�1E W GII116f-.1, Aa' 1I `__-- ® ,u..x.mv,uxm >ti xxA., rva sroxm �'v'�nx.`•.'•mo m.n xrne �`�uw�x 4 �xxan m xw 9 � � �.arxu o• x.+o9xm�>o xa,�.an f�fA1LOB'913 yyq �.At b ®.v rc�w�-.e...c�® LL 1 PHOTOMETRIC SITE PLAN E0.1 SCALE: 1" = 20'-0' N LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE 1. BUILDING MOUNTED FIXTURES SHALL BE IESNA FULL DESCRIPTION MOUNTING MOUNTING HEIGHT MANUFACTURER CATALOG NUMBER VOLTS NOTES KEY QUANTITY LAMP WALL MOUNTED LED FIXTURE. FULL CUT-OFF. SURFACE 10'-0" SPAULDING #l-30LU-4K-3-1 120/277 1 EW3 21 LED 4000K TYPE III DISTRIBUTION. BRONZE FINISH. @ Z AEG. LIGHTING g B z BBb 4. LIGHT FIXTURES TYPE •EW3' AND 'EW4 SHALL OPERATE SS FROM DUSK TO DAWN FOR SECURITY VIA PHOTO CELL MOUNTED LED FI%TURF. FULL CUT-OFF. SURFACE 10•-0" SPAULDING #LMC-30LU-4K-4-1 120,277 1 EWp 4 LED 4000K WALL TYPE N DISTRIBUTION. BRONZE FINISH. AEG. LIGHTING T lD NOTES: 1. COORDINATE FIXTURE FINISH WITH THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ROUGH -IN. GENERAL NOTES: 1. BUILDING MOUNTED FIXTURES SHALL BE IESNA FULL m R CUTOFF a 2. EXTERIOR FIXTURES SHALL BE UL LISTED FOR WET LOCATION 3, EXTERIOR LIGHTING ON EXISTING BUILDING IS EXISTING TO REMAIN, UNLESS 07HERWISE NOTED EXISTING 6 LIGHTING CONTRIBUTION IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE Z ] Z PHOTOMETRIC VALUES. @ Z p g B z BBb 4. LIGHT FIXTURES TYPE •EW3' AND 'EW4 SHALL OPERATE SS FROM DUSK TO DAWN FOR SECURITY VIA PHOTO CELL AND ASTRONOMICAL TIMECLOCK FOR 'ON /'OFF' � Ei OPERATION, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 0 0O i T lD a F F s I-- 9pxEY - 1 �m 10 a 11 E1 PARFET STREET MINI STORAGE PLANNED BUILDIN AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT UDG LOCATED IN THE SOUTWEST OF SECTION 16, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO I I : I I- / � l•:I i I ;I \ I t`11 35' VALLEY WATER I // DISTRICT ESMT. `I ; � (REG N0. 78098480) / OS -1 i r 5435 - Q ! 0.04 010 v I \I 2 I II, I 5' UTILITY ENT— f I� _ 10' UTBJtt 8.6z 'K ESMT. y • �1 hr' ..�/ 1 ❑ 1 �. GRAPHIC SCALE 1 HISTORIC DRAINAGE PLAN 40 ° 40 DNG DNG (IN FEET) 1 INCH - 40 FT GROUP ./ / /REG N0. 2011042920) ?/` 1y/rr ,q 5' UTIUTY E9AL 19 /(/ _-REC. NO. 2011042920) DRAINAGE ESMT. _(IAC. N0. 2011042920)--' PROPOSED DRAINAGE BASIN BOUNDARY ----_5118----- EX MINOR CONTOUR -- — -5120- — EX MAJOR CONTOUR 5118— PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR 5120 PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR Smrape ftq--e ham sh.tl 'Ful'-sp.aru '.i0.26 0.55 w®fl GRAPHIC SCALE 1 DEVELOPED DRAINAGE PLAN 40 ° 4o Bo N FEET) DNG DNG I INCH - 40 FT Ali Z 0 V O lwi w C -D Cf Q ckf0 Ln Z � a � � w L'i O 6 F Ckf N � w a � a w n' 0 w 0 Y U ❑/ UTNTyr ESYT. REC/N0-T011042920)� 5UTILITY ESMT• -REC. N0. 2011042920) NAG _r N0. 2011042920)>i I > n ■ • HISTORIC DRAINAGE BASIN BOUNDARY -----5116----- EX. MINOR CONTOUR-- --- --� -5115-...- -.. EX MAJOR CONTOUR -4� FLOW DIRECTION, TYPICALLY ON PAVED SURFACES QDESIGN POINT DESIGNATION j"I GRAPHIC SCALE 1 HISTORIC DRAINAGE PLAN 40 ° 40 DNG DNG (IN FEET) 1 INCH - 40 FT GROUP ./ / /REG N0. 2011042920) ?/` 1y/rr ,q 5' UTIUTY E9AL 19 /(/ _-REC. NO. 2011042920) DRAINAGE ESMT. _(IAC. N0. 2011042920)--' PROPOSED DRAINAGE BASIN BOUNDARY ----_5118----- EX MINOR CONTOUR -- — -5120- — EX MAJOR CONTOUR 5118— PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR 5120 PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR Smrape ftq--e ham sh.tl 'Ful'-sp.aru '.i0.26 0.55 w®fl GRAPHIC SCALE 1 DEVELOPED DRAINAGE PLAN 40 ° 4o Bo N FEET) DNG DNG I INCH - 40 FT Ali Z 0 V O lwi w C -D Cf Q ckf0 Ln Z � a � � w L'i O 6 F Ckf N � w a � a w n' 0 w 0 Y U ❑/ It was moved by Commissioner LEO and seconded by Commissioner KIMSEY to recommend DENIAL of Case No. WZ-15-11, a request for approval of a Specific Development Plan for property located at 12700 W. 44t1i Avenue, for the following reasons: 1. The proposal is not consistent with purpose of a Planned Development; 2. The proposal is not in substantial compliance with the Architectural and Site design Manual, the Streetscape Design Manual. Motion carried 4-2-1 with BODEN, BUCKNAM, KIMSEY and LEO approving; DORSEY and OHM denying; WEAVER abstaining. Ms. Ritchie added that each commissioner has been given a copy of the bylaws and asked that they be reviewed for discussion at a later date. A review of the bylaws will be added as an Agenda Item at a future meeting. 8. PUBLIC HEARING A. Case No. PBG -15-01: an application filed by Parfet Storage for approval of a Planned Building Group to allow six proposed storage buildings and the existing office/home to be used as an office/home for the site manager for the property located at 5130 Parfet Street. Ms. Reckert gave a short presentation regarding the Planned Building Group and the application. She entered into the record the contents of the case file, packet materials, the zoning ordinance, and the contents of the digital presentation. She stated the public notice and posting requirements have been met, therefore the Planning Commission has jurisdiction to hear this case. Ms. Reckert stated the property is zoned Industrial -Employment (I -E) and consists of 2 parcels. The one to the north is developed with an 1100 sq. ft. office building and a detached garage; the one to the south is undeveloped and used as detention for drainage for the parcel to the north. Access to the site is off Parfet Street to the west and there is an adjacent right-of-way on the southeast side of the site off of 50th Avenue. Ms. Reckert explained to the Commission that staff recommends denial due to the following concerns including: circulation and interior aisle width, landscaping does not include species, building architecture has questionable facade detail, the minimum for primary and secondary material has not been met. Also, regarding the right-of-way, staff recommends dedication for 50t1' Avenue to be built during development of Phase 2; the detention for this project should be shifted to not interfere with future construction of 50th Avenue and whether the drainage report indicates that the improvements are adequate to control erosion on the steep slopes. Planning Commission Minutes -3— April 3_April 21, 2016 EXHIBIT 2 Ms. Reckert stated staff met with the applicant and their representatives on April 20th regarding the concerns and would like to recommend a continuation until May 19, 2016. Commissioner BUCKNAM asked what the timeline is for the extension on 501h Avenue. Mr. Westberg stated there is not a timeline for the 501h Avenue construction; Public Works would like the right-of-way reserved for the development of Phase 2. Commissioner BUCKNAM also asked if the applicant knows what kind of material staff wants to see for the buildings to be ASDM compliant. Ms. Reckert replied there has been a discussion, but the applicant is hesitant to invest more money on architectural plans. Commissioner DORSEY's only concern at this time is the house in the middle of the property; it seems to hurt the development. Noah Nemmers Baseline Engineering 1950 Ford Street, Golden, CO Mr. Nemmers explained that refinements have been made and said the old house will be staying and will fit in with the architectural style of the rest of the buildings. All the development will be on Lot 1 and they are currently making refinements to Lot 2 to improve the drainage. With regards to staff's concerns, the applicant agreed to reflect the 20 -feet of ROW for 50"' Avenue on all plans; ROW dedication will be required when Lot 2 develops; pond improvements will be modified; they hope to demonstrate substantial compliance with the architecture criteria; further analyzation of drive aisles. Mr. Nemmers explained that with regards to the materials, the code is being followed and will be amended for clarification on the final set. There is a 1 -foot offset that extends to the roofline that meets the requirement; the treatments are intended to embellish the street facing elevation; the level of fagade detail shown was prepared based on the ASDM requirements for both color and material. The primary materials reflect the 40 % hard coat stucco and it will be above the foundation by at least 6". The secondary materials do not exceed the 60% threshold; and the glazing reflected on the elevations meets the 15% transparency. Southern and eastern drive aisles widths will be 24 -feet and the interior drive lanes will be 22 -feet. The proposed landscaping is in accordance and the correct species have been chosen, just not put in the plan where they will be located. Finally, the tenants will not have access to a dumpster as it would encourage them to dispose of unwanted goods. Commissioner KIMSEY has concerns about the 22 -feet drive aisles. Planning Commission Minutes -4— April 4_April 21, 2016 r 9. Commissioner OHM asked about the hours of operation and if the landscaping square footage is 9,928 sq. ft. or 8,095 sq. ft. Mr. Nemmers said the hours of operation will be Monday through Sunday 6am to 9pm, and the landscape plan is correct showing 8,095 sq. ft. Commissioner OHM also had numerous questions regarding the landscaping and lighting that he would like addressed on the landscape and lighting plans by the May 19 meeting. A copy of the list of questions will be given to Mr. Nemmers for review. It was moved by Commissioner WEAVER and seconded by Commissioner DORSEY to continue Case No. PBG -15-01 until May 19, 2016. Motion Carried 7-0 ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Commissioner DORSEY and seconded by Commissioner KIMSEY to adjourn the meeting at 8:01 p.m. Motion carried 7-0. Scott Ohm, Chair Planning Commission Minutes April 21, 2016 Tammy Odean, Recording Secretary -5— PARFET STREET MINI STORAGE PLANNED BUILDING GROUP w AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE " LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, J CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO w DECLARATION OF PLANNED BUILDING GROUP 5130 PARFBT STREET W WHEREAS, PARFET STORAGE LLC HAVE SUBMITTED A PLANNED BUILDING CROUP PLAN FOR THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE'S APPROVAL PURSUANT TO WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS, FOR THE LAND AREA LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS: 1031 CIF PAaTT PAIS A T 2go AT J2. N T/4 OF �CTIOM i6 TOWNa+IP j cn �TIi RAuGE 69 WEST OF PRIhCIPM� L'ERIDIAN CITY (i MHEAT RInfF COUNTY OF rcccacrw STALE OF Cn (RA_� WHEREAS, THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE HAS APPROVED SAID PLAN ON NOW, THEREFORE, UPON FINAL APPROVAL OF THE PLANNED BUILDING GROUP BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, THIS DECLARATION IS NOTICE TO PROSPECTIVE PURCHASERS OF THE LAND AREA AND TO ALL OTHERS THAT IT IS THE SUBJECT OF A PLANNED BUILDING GROUP AND THAT SAID PIAN AND THE ORDINANCES RELATING THRETO ARE BINDINGON SUBSEQUENT PURCHASERS, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS UNLESS THE PLAN IS ABANONED, AMENDED OR WITHDRAWN IN WRITING AND DULY RECORDED AND SHALL LIMIT THE CONSTRUCTION, USE AND OPERATION OF ALL LAND AND STRUCTURES INCLUDED WITHIN SUCH PLANS TO ALL CONDITIONS AND UMITATIONS SET FORTH IN SUCH PLANS AND ORDINANCES OWNER: PARFET STORAGE, LLC BY GREGORY A HERSERS AS MEMBER/MANAGER STATE OF COLORADO ) ) s5 COUNTY OF JEFFERSON ) THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS _ DAY OF A.D. 20_ BY WITNESSMY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL, MY COMMISSION EXPIRES NOTARY PUBLIC CTTY CERTIFICATION APPROVED THIS _ DAY OF ATTEST CITY CLERK DIHLCIL)K OF PUBLIC WORKS BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE. COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDERS CERTIFICATE STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS COUNTY OF JEFFERSON ) I HERBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER OF JEFFERSON COUNTY AT GOLDEN, COLORADO, AT _ O'CLOCK —M. ON THE _ DAY OF AD., IN BOOK PAGE —. RECEPTION NO. JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER BY: DEPUTY PLANNING COMMMON CERTIFICATION APPROVED THIS _ DAY OF _ BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION. CHAIRPERSON I, ROBERT M. HAYDEN DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARY OF PARFET MR STORAGE WAS MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWIIDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLL COLORADO STATUES, CURRENT REVISED EDITION AS AMENDED, THE ACCOMPANYING PLAN ACCURATELY REPRESENTS SAID SURVEY. SURVEYORS SEAL SIGNATURE ROBERT M. HAYDEN, L.S. 27268 Know what's below. Call before you dig. VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1- = 1000' SITE BENCHMARK THE BENCHMARK USED FOR THIS SITE IS NCS 12409, LOCATED AT N=1713256.48, E- 3109706.48 (NADB3)/ N= 71368867, E= 110490.93 (CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE DATUM), WITH AT SECTION CORNER DESCRIPTION OF E 1/4, S16 WHICH IS A 3-1/4' ALUMINUM CAP (LS 23524) IN THE CONCRETE SIDEWALK WITH AN ELEVATION= 5393.92 NO FENCING SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 26-603 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 2. LANDSCAPING SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 26-502 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 3. PARKING SHALL BE CONSISTENT 1WTH SECTION 26-501 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 4. SITE AND BUILDING LIGHTING SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 26-503 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 5. SIGNAGE SHALL BE CONSISTENT W TH ARTICLE VII OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 6' THE BUILDING AND DESIGN STANDARDS WILL FOLLOW THE ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE DESIGN MANUAL 7. SITE SIGNAGE SHALL NOTE THAT 'COMMERCIAL VEHICLE ACCESS IS LIMITED TO VEHICLES UNDER 17 FEET IN LENGTH'. RIGHT-OF-WAY RESERVATION A TWENTY FOOT WADE STRIP OF LAND LOCATED ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF LOT 2, PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION, TRACT 2 REPLAT IS HEREBY RESERVED AS PUBUC RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR THE FUTURE CONSTRUCTION OF WEST 50TH AVENUE. NO BUILDING, DETENTION/DRAINAGE FACILITIES, OR OTHER PERMANENT STRUCTURES SHALL BE ALLOWED WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THE RESERVATION AREA. THE OWNER SHAH RETAIN THE RIGHT TO USE SAID RESERVATION AREA UNTIL SUCH TIME AS LOT 2, PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION, TRACT 2 REPLAT /2 DEVELOPS. AT THE TIME OF SAID LOT 2 DEVELOPMENT THE RIGHT-OF-WAY RESERVATION AREA SHALL BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE AS PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CITY SEEKS TO CONSTRUCT WEST 50TH AVENUE PRIOR TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF SAID LOT 2, THE OWNER, HEIRS, AND ASSIGNS AGREES TO SELL SAID RESERVATION AREA TO THE CITY AT FAIR MARKET VALUE WEST 50'I H AVENUE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTION OF OR FEES IN UEU OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE PUBUC IMPROVEMENTS ACROSS THE WEST 50TH AVENUE FRONTAGE SHALL BE REOUIRED AT THE TIME OF DEVELOPMENT OF LOT 2, PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION. TRACT 2 REPLAT J2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS CONSIST OF MINI -WAREHOUSE STORAGE UNITS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO THE DOSING RESIDENCE TO CONVERT IT TO RESIDENCE/ OFFICE SPACE ACCESS TO THE SITE WILL BE OFF OF PARFET STREET AND A PRIVATE DRIVE. IMPROVEMENTS WILL CONSIST OF BUILDING CONSTRUCTION, PAVED ACCESS DRIVES AND ASSOCIATED LANDSCAPING. ARCHITECTURAL- ALL BUILDINGS TO BE CORRUGATED METAL CAD WITH WOOD ACCENTS IN NATURAL EARTH TONE COLORS HOURS OF OPERATION ARE FROM 6 AM - 9 PM : MONDAY -SUNDAY THIS DEVELOPMENT FLAN IS FOR THE NORTHERN LOT ONLY AND THAT PRIOR TO ANY STE DEVELOPMENT ON THE SOUTH, A STE PLAN PROCESS WILL BE REQUIRED. 'WASELINE Engin M ng - Planning - Sunqug f,MwKO S T E E L �.,F WheatRj!jge L XcwEmr9y' APPLICANT PARFET STORAGE, LLC. 14995 FOOTHILLS ROAD GOLDEN. 00 BOWL CONTACT: GREG HERBERS 303.717.0378 CMI. ENGINBBR BASELINE ENGINEERING 1950 FORD STREET GOLDEN, 00 80401 CONTACT: NOAH HEMMERS, P.E 303.940.9966 M,IYY;.yY MAKO STEEL BUILDINGS 5650 EL CAMINO REAL /100 CARLSBAD, CA 92006 760.448.1760 1 11 MLP .011 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE 7500 W. 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 303.234.5900 XCEL ENERGY 1123 WEST 3RD AVENUE DENVER, CA 80223 CONTACT: DONNA GEORGE 303.57.3306 FIRE PROTECTION ARVADA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 7903 ALLISON WAY ARVADA, CO B00D5 303.424.3012 SITE DATA TABLE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 1 IN PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION, TRACT 2 REPLAT /2, FOR NORTHERN LOT ONLY ZONE DISTRICT: I -E INDUSTRIAL -EMPLOYMENT WZ-12-02 SQUARE FEET ACRES PERCENTAGE TOTAL AREA OF PROPERTY: 53.155 SF 1.22 10016 TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE 19,720 S OAS 37.0% TOTAL PARKING/DRIVE COVERAGE 23,507 SF 0.54 44.0% TOTAL OPEN SPACEAANDSCAPING. 9,928 SF 0.23 19.0% OFFICE AREA 187 SF RESIDENCE AREA 867 SF BUILDING HEIGHT: 50'-0- (ALLOWED), 9'-4- (PROPOSED), 25-0- (EXISTING) PARKING SPACES REQUIRED PROVIDED PERCENTAGE NUMBER CIF RESIDENTIAL SPACES: 2 2 100% NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES 12 200% NUMBER OF HANDICAP SPACES: 1 I IOD% AS GUIDING E ELEVATIONS_ _ A6 50TH AVE 50TH AVE -E1O"GN ENG-_DRMNAGE - EXHIBIT 3 PROJECT LOCATION NTE STATE 7D FRONTAL RD i N 44TH AVE VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1- = 1000' SITE BENCHMARK THE BENCHMARK USED FOR THIS SITE IS NCS 12409, LOCATED AT N=1713256.48, E- 3109706.48 (NADB3)/ N= 71368867, E= 110490.93 (CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE DATUM), WITH AT SECTION CORNER DESCRIPTION OF E 1/4, S16 WHICH IS A 3-1/4' ALUMINUM CAP (LS 23524) IN THE CONCRETE SIDEWALK WITH AN ELEVATION= 5393.92 NO FENCING SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 26-603 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 2. LANDSCAPING SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 26-502 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 3. PARKING SHALL BE CONSISTENT 1WTH SECTION 26-501 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 4. SITE AND BUILDING LIGHTING SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 26-503 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 5. SIGNAGE SHALL BE CONSISTENT W TH ARTICLE VII OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 6' THE BUILDING AND DESIGN STANDARDS WILL FOLLOW THE ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE DESIGN MANUAL 7. SITE SIGNAGE SHALL NOTE THAT 'COMMERCIAL VEHICLE ACCESS IS LIMITED TO VEHICLES UNDER 17 FEET IN LENGTH'. RIGHT-OF-WAY RESERVATION A TWENTY FOOT WADE STRIP OF LAND LOCATED ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF LOT 2, PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION, TRACT 2 REPLAT IS HEREBY RESERVED AS PUBUC RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR THE FUTURE CONSTRUCTION OF WEST 50TH AVENUE. NO BUILDING, DETENTION/DRAINAGE FACILITIES, OR OTHER PERMANENT STRUCTURES SHALL BE ALLOWED WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THE RESERVATION AREA. THE OWNER SHAH RETAIN THE RIGHT TO USE SAID RESERVATION AREA UNTIL SUCH TIME AS LOT 2, PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION, TRACT 2 REPLAT /2 DEVELOPS. AT THE TIME OF SAID LOT 2 DEVELOPMENT THE RIGHT-OF-WAY RESERVATION AREA SHALL BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE AS PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CITY SEEKS TO CONSTRUCT WEST 50TH AVENUE PRIOR TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF SAID LOT 2, THE OWNER, HEIRS, AND ASSIGNS AGREES TO SELL SAID RESERVATION AREA TO THE CITY AT FAIR MARKET VALUE WEST 50'I H AVENUE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTION OF OR FEES IN UEU OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE PUBUC IMPROVEMENTS ACROSS THE WEST 50TH AVENUE FRONTAGE SHALL BE REOUIRED AT THE TIME OF DEVELOPMENT OF LOT 2, PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION. TRACT 2 REPLAT J2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS CONSIST OF MINI -WAREHOUSE STORAGE UNITS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO THE DOSING RESIDENCE TO CONVERT IT TO RESIDENCE/ OFFICE SPACE ACCESS TO THE SITE WILL BE OFF OF PARFET STREET AND A PRIVATE DRIVE. IMPROVEMENTS WILL CONSIST OF BUILDING CONSTRUCTION, PAVED ACCESS DRIVES AND ASSOCIATED LANDSCAPING. ARCHITECTURAL- ALL BUILDINGS TO BE CORRUGATED METAL CAD WITH WOOD ACCENTS IN NATURAL EARTH TONE COLORS HOURS OF OPERATION ARE FROM 6 AM - 9 PM : MONDAY -SUNDAY THIS DEVELOPMENT FLAN IS FOR THE NORTHERN LOT ONLY AND THAT PRIOR TO ANY STE DEVELOPMENT ON THE SOUTH, A STE PLAN PROCESS WILL BE REQUIRED. 'WASELINE Engin M ng - Planning - Sunqug f,MwKO S T E E L �.,F WheatRj!jge L XcwEmr9y' APPLICANT PARFET STORAGE, LLC. 14995 FOOTHILLS ROAD GOLDEN. 00 BOWL CONTACT: GREG HERBERS 303.717.0378 CMI. ENGINBBR BASELINE ENGINEERING 1950 FORD STREET GOLDEN, 00 80401 CONTACT: NOAH HEMMERS, P.E 303.940.9966 M,IYY;.yY MAKO STEEL BUILDINGS 5650 EL CAMINO REAL /100 CARLSBAD, CA 92006 760.448.1760 1 11 MLP .011 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE 7500 W. 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 303.234.5900 XCEL ENERGY 1123 WEST 3RD AVENUE DENVER, CA 80223 CONTACT: DONNA GEORGE 303.57.3306 FIRE PROTECTION ARVADA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 7903 ALLISON WAY ARVADA, CO B00D5 303.424.3012 --T—EX SITE DATA TABLE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 1 IN PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION, TRACT 2 REPLAT /2, FOR NORTHERN LOT ONLY ZONE DISTRICT: I -E INDUSTRIAL -EMPLOYMENT WZ-12-02 SQUARE FEET ACRES PERCENTAGE TOTAL AREA OF PROPERTY: 53.155 SF 1.22 10016 TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE 19,720 S OAS 37.0% TOTAL PARKING/DRIVE COVERAGE 23,507 SF 0.54 44.0% TOTAL OPEN SPACEAANDSCAPING. 9,928 SF 0.23 19.0% OFFICE AREA 187 SF RESIDENCE AREA 867 SF BUILDING HEIGHT: 50'-0- (ALLOWED), 9'-4- (PROPOSED), 25-0- (EXISTING) PARKING SPACES REQUIRED PROVIDED PERCENTAGE NUMBER CIF RESIDENTIAL SPACES: 2 2 100% NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES 12 200% NUMBER OF HANDICAP SPACES: 1 I IOD% --T—EX CASE HISTORY: SHEET -EX - IIAiD WZ-12-02 ---SHEET NO. SHEET TITLE WZ-03-08 MS -02-07 C1. (:AVER- - Wz-1 C2 ..- -- - - -- SITE PLAN _ _ _ _ MS -10-08o-04 WZ-14-15 C3 LANDSCAPE PLAN _ - -_ PBG -15-01 _ Al BUILDING A ELEVATIONS WA -16-02 - - A2 BUILDING 8 IE EVATIONS _ -C A3 BUILDING ELEVATIONS _ _ A4 BUILDING 0 ELEVATIONS AS GUIDING E ELEVATIONS_ _ A6 'BUILDING F ELEVATIONS -E1O"GN ENG-_DRMNAGE 7LAN_ GEPL g EXHIBIT 3 z 0 V 0 w W Q O p4� N P4 � Z N W o W H F— F— W a � Q rj 0 0 U C1 PARFET STREET MINI STORAGE PLANNED BUILDING GROUP AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO Q� _________________________________________ , T PR� 54' _ DRAINAGE ESMT. (REC. NO. 2011042920) 20' CLEAR CREEL( WATER h SANITARY SEWER ESMT. (REC. NO. 80045919) 20' VALLEY WATER -- DISTRICT ESMT. (REC. NO. 823012940) - 15' DRAINAGE ESMT. _ T(REG. NO. 201142920) r5' UTILITY ESMT. 1 I I 20 WATER �( ESMT. I I JCr ` FUTURE WILDINGS(UPON Q ` AN APPROVAL OF A STE \ PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION) \ v \ 1 SITE PLAN C2 C2 N GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 20 40 W� su..RK -- (IN b(IN FEET) awry rwi 1 INCH - 20 FT BEC Jos xn 3208-suc 3208—SP Pnase I.d+ rm 2 v C2 Z O a S rc W z O yyryryE��yp�� NO= 1. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY ALL EX CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND N U O w NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF IX CONDITIONS DIFFER FROM WHAT IS SHOWN ON o w 2. CONTRACTOR MUST REPAIR ANY DAMAGE AREAS THAT ARE NOT A PART OF OF THE Lamm APPROVED PLANS BACK TO ITS ORIGINAL STATE Lv W 3. ASPHALT i CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTIONS TO BE REPLACED SHALL MATCH EASTING PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTIONS. " R Er - PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT h LL 4. QUANTITIES PROVIDED ARE APPROMMATE, CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY. 1-- oe s� PROPOSED WILDING 5. DHE MOST CURRENT MUTW STANDARDS SHALL APPLY FOR PARKING STRIPING. 5, FIR PROPOSED LANDSCAPING I DPROPOSED LANDSCAPING a ~ % � z > L z PROPERTY BOUNDARY z ®® 8 z E — - - — RIGHT OF WAY UNE N u7 LOT UNE k o W - EASEMENT UNE v 44000 PSI ) ESHET �3 �• - IX EDGE OF ASPHALT o a - - IX CURD g GUTTER m C2 C2 N.T.S. PROPOSED 2' CURB ✓t GUTTER Maw i - - - IX WOW FENCE o PROPOSED GATE N GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 20 40 W� su..RK -- (IN b(IN FEET) awry rwi 1 INCH - 20 FT BEC Jos xn 3208-suc 3208—SP Pnase I.d+ rm 2 v C2 Z O a S rc 3 z 5 s z O yyryryE��yp�� NO= 1. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY ALL EX CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND U O w NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF IX CONDITIONS DIFFER FROM WHAT IS SHOWN ON APPROVED PLANS. w 2. CONTRACTOR MUST REPAIR ANY DAMAGE AREAS THAT ARE NOT A PART OF OF THE APPROVED PLANS BACK TO ITS ORIGINAL STATE Lv C' 3. ASPHALT i CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTIONS TO BE REPLACED SHALL MATCH EASTING Q SECTIONS. Er - O 4. QUANTITIES PROVIDED ARE APPROMMATE, CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY. 1-- s� C 5. DHE MOST CURRENT MUTW STANDARDS SHALL APPLY FOR PARKING STRIPING. 5, V 6. ALL RADIUS IS 2 FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. F a a ~ W q W a Tn H o N u7 W a cr- 44000 PSI ) ESHET �3 �• d ASPHALT PAVING ASPHALT PAVING 11 o a w 3 0 r23' 1NDE CONCRETE PAN C2 C2 N.T.S. aa. Maw N GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 20 40 W� su..RK -- (IN b(IN FEET) awry rwi 1 INCH - 20 FT BEC Jos xn 3208-suc 3208—SP Pnase I.d+ rm 2 v C2 PARFET STREET MINI STORAGE PLANNED BUILDING GROUP AN OMCIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT REDGE LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO -------- e7- -------------- --------------- --- -------------------------- ---- 35 VALLEY ATM N DISTRICT E$MT. (REC. NO. 78Cb649O) S 89-49-15- E (325.0l')' S " / , T- - - - - - - -T- T 7M ........ .... 11, U'ujZESMT.2 BUILDING F 3,875 SF R. IF _Lps ............. k 10' UTILITY ESMT. cr ................ ........... . EX. RESIDENCE, 125' WATER tE2 I BUILDING 8 WILDING C BUILDING F 'PT ES01 1 1,280 SF , , f I I /I . (REC. Nq. 7809§490)- 3,600 SF �MSF I I .. ; I I I - 2,400 SF SF 2,00 SF 1p, �IUTIIITY I ESlIfT. I A p �Z.1?1. I FOR REMOVE EX TREE FEET (SEC.( DS s s It - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - - \_-, E 89W915: V k2 I UTIU Ty ESMT. ........... CONSTRUCT A 6' HIGH SOLD WOW FENCE ALONG THE TH PROPERTY LINE 20 CLEAR CREEK WATER & . ......... =E�)T. TM �RE]q NY �F' ----------- WNAGE­ESMT.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 ------ 2TI� A ESMT. AS, 1+50.00 _54n,03 FUTURE BUILPING§cu _AN_MWVAL OF A PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION) LANDSCAPE PLAN SECTION UNE REQUIRED PROPERTY BOUNDARY OPEN SPACE 7,971 SF LOT LINE MAXIMUM PERCENT LANDSCAPED COVERAGE 35% EASEMENT LINE -5�24- - EX. MINOR CONTOUR 5 2�­ - EX. MAJOR CONTOUR —5124- -5 UTILI 4M 0) REC. NO. 2;iE0§2`T2 125— PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR A0 A,4'jL% OftLLANCE S�13ERRY r HT FUUCRCWN,STA0XC, �,I A-3._ TAUN`(S --- --- - - - - - - - - F LIU CA�. SlAnD - - - -- - SSG SPEC OL 0� D Aa -16M RAIN S T� I 2SICAL. FULL CR". STAXEC _(REC. NO. 201104� - RED ­ ­ 2�'CAL `R�_ A00 U&S SPEC a. III Ge �W ELORA 10. W� F UCR� S -EC B&B SPEC QUA M CP Cr-- P� 2,51 CAL F LUFRC­I S AKEEI TN C- — PDGA��t4�r. z!PCAI_ R­6� X. ITY F U FR01W S AIKED G&B SPEC QUA IW WNAGE­ESMT.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 ------ 2TI� A ESMT. AS, 1+50.00 _54n,03 FUTURE BUILPING§cu _AN_MWVAL OF A PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION) LANDSCAPE PLAN SHADE TRE SHRUBS ROCK MULCH 2* NATIVE SEED MIX ASPHALT NOTE: 1. ALL LANDSCAPED AREA SHALL BE SERVED BY A ZONED, AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTE)A. 2. INDIVIDUAL TREE AND SHRUB SPECIES WILL BE ESTABUSHED BY A LANDSCAPE PLAN AND APPROVED BY STAFF DURING THE BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW PROCESS. 3. NON -LIVING MAIERIAL SHALL BE LIMITED TO 35X NON -LIVING LANDSCAPING WILL NOT EXCEED 35% OF THE TOTAL LANDSCAPED COVERAGE. LANDW"E TABLE PER S. 26-502 LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS SECTION UNE REQUIRED PROPERTY BOUNDARY OPEN SPACE 7,971 SF LOT LINE MAXIMUM PERCENT LANDSCAPED COVERAGE 35% EASEMENT LINE -5�24- - EX. MINOR CONTOUR 5 2�­ - EX. MAJOR CONTOUR —5124- PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR 125— PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR SHADE TRE SHRUBS ROCK MULCH 2* NATIVE SEED MIX ASPHALT NOTE: 1. ALL LANDSCAPED AREA SHALL BE SERVED BY A ZONED, AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTE)A. 2. INDIVIDUAL TREE AND SHRUB SPECIES WILL BE ESTABUSHED BY A LANDSCAPE PLAN AND APPROVED BY STAFF DURING THE BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW PROCESS. 3. NON -LIVING MAIERIAL SHALL BE LIMITED TO 35X NON -LIVING LANDSCAPING WILL NOT EXCEED 35% OF THE TOTAL LANDSCAPED COVERAGE. LANDW"E TABLE PER S. 26-502 LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED PROVIDED OPEN SPACE 7,971 SF 8.095 SF MAXIMUM PERCENT LANDSCAPED COVERAGE 35% QUAN. SYM STREET TREES' 5 SIZE ON-SITE TREES 8 ON-SITE SHRUBS 80 ui Z_ Lu.. �z > Z_ z z Q -TREES AND SHRUBS M BE FROM THE SELECTED PLANT UTST NOTED BELOW PLANT LIST QUAN. SYM COMM0ft 80rANECAL NAME SIZE REMARKS TREES A0 A,4'jL% OftLLANCE S�13ERRY r HT FUUCRCWN,STA0XC, �,I A-3._ TAUN`(S G&S SPECOUAL� w F LIU CA�. SlAnD P'_ N.— SSG SPEC OL 0� .1 dPERA_ W.IEYU0I 2SICAL. FULL CR". STAXEC VkC T, - RED ­ ­ 2�'CAL `R�_ A00 U&S SPEC a. III Ge �W ELORA 10. W� F UCR� S -EC B&B SPEC QUA M CP Cr-- P� 2,51 CAL F LUFRC­I S AKEEI TN C- — PDGA��t4�r. z!PCAI_ R­6� X. ITY F U FR01W S AIKED G&B SPEC QUA IW SHRUBS 8. SLUE � ".GEA 5GA, SI'ACING PER PLAN C�. — FULL F� CC SPRM GREEN COWACT CRASBEARY 5 GAL SPACING PER PLAN Vkl— � 'Smw G- FULL FORM MAFF RURNI I SPACING PER PLAN C_ — v-_ FULL FCAM os GACW�� FRAO'IANT S'A� 5 G& SPACING PER PLAN F LFORN W I GAL SFACING PFN K- 1UU FC)FtM SGA, ­CING a W 0 C G.W."ve FULL F� Ra Rov G= SOAL SPACING PER r1LAN 8- ­.� - �� FULI � SP �ClFt� �A 5 GAL SPAIINGIFRP- S_ I- 1-wIU- FUIL FORM 11 SLIE ARR� 5 HT FULL CRIDINN, STAKE SM EC OU&LITY NOTE., ALL PROPOSED TREES AND SHRUBS WILL BE INSTALLED PER THE MINIMUM REQUIRED PLANTING SIZES FOR THERE RESPECTIVE SPECIES. SEC 26-502 (F) IN OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE CODE (DECIDUOUS/ORNAMENTAL TREES = (2)' CAUPER MEASURED (1) FOOT ABOVE THE GROUND. CONIFEROUS TREES WILL BE A MINIMUM OF (6) FEET AT TIME Or INSTALLATION. ALL GROUND COVERS WILL BE (5) GALLONS MINIMUM AT TIME OF INSTALLATION). 0 3 - LAJ (D F- :2 (n ") I-- LLJ L� BEC GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 20 40 3208 ­SP Ph- 15 (IN FEET) 111407 3 w I INCH = 20 FT C3 Meredith Reckert From: Noah Nemmers <noah@baselinecorp.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 8:55 PM To: Dave Brossman; Meredith Reckert Cc: Alan McKinster (amckinster@kenray.biz); Greg & Angel Herbers; Mark Westberg Subject: RE: PC report Attachments: Language for PBG.docx Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Dave and Meredith, Thanks for the text wording for the notes to add to the plans and we will identify the 20' wide strip as "RIGHT-OF-WAY RESERVATION AREA". We would like to revise the second note to identify the actual cash -in -lieu amount, I've attached the suggested revision here but did not quantify the dollar value for the curb, gutter, and sidewalk improvements that we had discussed last week. In addition to the notes we wanted to get clarification on the remaining items that need to be resolved to gain staff support: With respect to the drive aisle issue it is a private improvement and the owners are not in a position to negotiate that aspect of the site plan as they have already revised the plan once to achieve the 22' minimum that was requested on the initial referral and any further adjustments would jeopardize the rentable space available in the initial phase. It's also important to point out that though my exhibit proves that a large box truck can maneuver these aisles that it is an unlikely scenario that a truck of that size would be utilizing this facility due to the size of the units being rented. We trust that the City can absolve themselves of any responsibility for dictating that these be any wider than shown as it would be a deal killer for this project. • Landscaping can be further refined if needed but the staff report did not seem to make this as big an issue as the one gentleman on the commission did. The only other item that seems to be nebulous is the basis on which the City still feels the Architecture is out of compliance with the ASDM criteria. In my preparations for the hearing and further review of the code we seem to be meeting all the minimum standards for percentages, material (durability), and the required offset. This can certainly be refined with the plans that will be submitted for building permit but we would need more specific examples of where further revisions are required. We would appreciate another face to face meeting to finalize these issues and get a clear understanding of the revisions or conditions necessary in order to gain staff support in advance of a May 19th hearing for a final decision. Regards, NOAH NEMMERS, P.E. I Civil Engineering Manager, Golden I Baseline Engineering, Planning, & Surveying 1 1950 Ford Street I Golden, CO 80401 1 Phone: 303.940.9966 x 207 1 Cell: 303.482.7712 1 Fax: 303.940.9959 www.baselinecorp.com -----Original Message ----- From: Dave Brossman [mailto:dbrossman@ci.wheatridge.co.us] Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 11:01 AM To: Noah Nemmers; Meredith Reckert Cc: Alan McKinster (amckinster@kenray.biz); Greg & Angel Herbers; Mark Westberg Subject: RE: PC report Noah - You will need to identify the 20' wide strip as "RIGHT-OF-WAY RESERVATION AREA" and then add the ATTACHED language for the two Notes to the plans for the Right -of -Way Reservation and the construction of Public Improvements. LIN David F. Brossman, PLS Development Review Engineer/City Surveyor Phone & Fax: 303.235.2864 [Description: Description: Description: Description: cid:image001.jpg@01CC2F26.DBA99AD0] From: Noah Nemmers [mailto:noah@baselinecorp.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 2:38 PM To: Meredith Reckert Cc: Alan McKinster (amckinster@kenray.biz); Greg & Angel Herbers; Dave Brossman; Mark Westberg; Kenneth Johnstone Subject: RE: PC report Hi Meredith, Thanks again for everyone's time this morning to move us closer to gaining staff support on the project. We are looking forward to the PC hearing tomorrow and will gather the commissions feedback and request a continuance to allow us the time needed to refine the plans where necessary in order to gain staff support in advance of a May 19th hearing for a final decision. * In regard to the Architecture we hope to demonstrate our substantial compliance with the Criteria and continue to work with your staff on the final elevations. Landscape will be amended if necessary to specify particular plant material placement. * Drive Isle widths were widened from 20 feet to 22 feet to comply with the Minimum standards on the private drive isles and the fire access meets Arvada Fire requirements. I've also included the analysis we performed for a 30' moving truck which is in excess of the largest truck most consumers can rent. * Trash we feel is a minor issue but it's certainly preferable to not have a dumpster and enclosure on-site that would encourage tenants to use the facility for their personal disposal and dump site. Office waste will be in a traditional curb side pickup container. * In contrast to the perceived tone of the Staff Report you confirmed that the City has no objection to the use proposed and we all agreed that the use poses no significant impact to City services and is a benefit to local businesses that can store files off-site. * We trust that the 20' dedication is no longer an issue with the development of Lot 1 and we will show the "Future 20' ROW" on all revised plans along with the note Dave will provide in regard to the curb, gutter, and sidewalk requirements that will be conditioned on the development of Lot 2. Please let me know if I have not represented our conversations accurately and thanks again for your efforts! Regards, NOAH NEMMERS, P.E. I Civil Engineering Manager, Golden I Baseline Engineering, Planning, & Surveying 1 1950 Ford Street I Golden, CO 804011 Phone: 303.940.9966 x 207 ( Cell: 303.482.7712 1 Fax: 303.940.9959 1 www.baseIinecorp.com<http://www.baseIinecorp.com/> From: Meredith Reckert[maiIto:mreckert@ci.wheatridge.co.us] Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 9:03 AM To: Greg & Angel Herbers Cc: Noah Nemmers; Alan McKinster (amckinster@kenray.biz<mailto:amckinster@kenray.biz>) Subject: RE: PC report The extension of West 50th Avenue from Kipling to Ward has been controversial for the last 30 years. Certain City Councils have supported it but during the 2000's it was not supported. I do not have specific reference to a particular meeting or staff report but just that in general, at that time, the thought was not to extend it. That philosophy has changed which is why we're asking for a dedication now. Meredith Reckert, AICP Senior Planner Office Phone: 303-235-2848 FAX: 303-235-2857 [cid:image001.jpg@01CC6CA3.9C25E520] From: Greg & Angel Herbers [mailto:gaherbers@q.com] Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 11:27 AM To: Meredith Reckert Cc: Noah Nemmers; Alan McKinster (amckinster@kenray.biz<mailto:amckinster@kenray.biz>) Subject: Re: PC report Meredith, Were you able to find the date of the City Council meeting where the policy was established that 50th Avenue would not be extended? I believe you spoke with my wife about our need for this at your offices last week. You refer to it in your January 20th, 2011 Planning Commission Staff Report, pg. 5, WZ-10-08/MS-10-04?Noss. Greg Herbers Parfet Storage, LLC From: "Meredith Reckert" <mreckert@ci.wheatridge.co.us<mailto:mreckert@ci.wheatridge.co.us>> To: "Noah Nemmers"<noah@baselinecorp.com<mailto:noah@baselinecorp.com>>, "Greg & Angel Herbers" <gaherbers@q.com<mailto:gaherbers@q.com>>, "Alan McKinster (amckinster@kenray.biz<mailto:amckinster@kenray.biz>)" <amckinster@kenray.biz<mailto:amckinster@kenray.biz>> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 4:30:15 PM Subject: PC report Meredith Reckert, AICP Senior Planner 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Office Phone: 303-235-2848 FAX: 303-235-2857 www.ci.wheatridge.co.us<http://www.ci.wheatridge.co.us/> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail contains business -confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, electronic storage or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, attaching the original message, and delete the original message from your computer, and any network to which your computer is connected. Thank you. Cily of (" ,=tRJdge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Case No. PBG-15-01/Parfet Street Storage A request for approval of a Planned Building Group on property zoned Industrial -Employment (I -E) at 5130 Parfet Street Pianoinc O,nm dirn, April 21, 20I6 Acrial photo Aerial photo Zoning Map 3 a , Site A —2t C6ruT site d View north on f View looking Parfet Street_northeast northeast across - ...._ the site 40 *V --= View looking View lookine east 1 east at outdoor down dove aisle ��77 m storage area View looking west from 50" at south +.y end of site izas... Staff report — Comments/ Areas of Concern Circulation and interior aisle width — is 22' adequat'e? • Landscaping does not include species — quantities appear okay • Building atehitecture — questionable fagade detail and articulation • Materials —do they meet minimums for primary and secondary materials? • Right-of-way: Staff recommends dedication for 501° Avenue to be built during development of Phase 2 • Detention: Recommend shifting to not interfere with future construction of 501' Avenue • Drainage report —are improt'entents adequate to address erosion on steep slopes? s`r View looking west from 501" at south end of site Process Zone change from PID and A-1 to 1-E: Reconnrtended for approval by PC Approved by City Council on March 9, 201 No neighborhood meeting required for PBG Referral: Concerns from city departments regarding compliance with ASDM, Comp Plan and drainage Next steps: Met with applicant on April 20, 2016 Staf t'recommends approval of continuance until May 19.2016 0b/02/2O|h = FARM MIN MM SIMAM PLANNED BUHMU OROUP Ed lit 0b/02/2O|h = FARM MIN MM SIMAM PLANNED BUHMU OROUP lit 0b/02/2O|h = C C�AVL f�C,Vk C 1�CA-, PBG -15-01 PARFET STORAGE The operation hours are Monday through Sunday 6am to 9pm The cover sheet shows the landscape SF at 9,928 Sf but the landscape plan shows 8,095 SF? Landscape Plan 1. Why are you proposing planting trees in the utility easement on the west side? 2. Why are you proposing planting trees in the utility easement on the east side? 3. What specific type of native grass? 4. Missing mature tree width and height from schedule. 5. Missing Tree quantity schedule. 6. Missing Tree requirement schedule based on street frontage and total landscape SF. 7. Are you providing a 6ft height fence on the south side? 8. The Chanticleer pear tree is listed as a 10ft height which is not per the city's 2" caliper requirement. 9. The autumn brillance serviceberry is listed as a 7 ft height which is not per the city's 2" caliper requirement. 10. The trees do not appear to be drawn at a mature size. Lighting Plan There appears to be light spilling on all 4 sides of the property but mostly the south and east sides. It was moved by Commissioner LEO and seconded by Commissioner KIMSEY to recommend DENIAL of Case No. WZ-15-11, a request for approval of a Specific Development Plan for property located at 12700 W. 44th Avenue, for the following reasons: 1. The proposal is not consistent with purpose of a Planned Development; 2. The proposal is not in substantial compliance with the Architectural and Site design Manual, the Streetscape Design Manual. Motion carried 4-2-1 with BODEN, BUCKNAM, KIMSEY and LEO approving; DORSEY and OHM denying; WEAVER abstaining. Ms. Ritchie added that each commissioner has been given a copy of the bylaws and asked that they be reviewed for discussion at a later date. A review of the bylaws will be added as an Agenda Item at a future meeting. S. PUBLIC HEARING A. Case No. PBG -15-01: an application filed by Parfet Storage for approval of a Planned Building Group to allow six proposed storage buildings and the existing office/home to be used as an office/home for the site manager for the property located at 5130 Parfet Street. Ms. Reckert gave a short presentation regarding the Planned Building Group and the \� application. She entered into the record the contents of the case file, packet materials, the zoning ordinance, and the contents of the digital presentation. She stated the public notice and posting requirements have been met, therefore the Planning Commission has jurisdiction to hear this case. Ms. Reckert stated the property is zoned Industrial -Employment (I -E) and consists of 2 parcels. The one to the north is developed with an 1100 sq. ft. office building and a detached garage; the one to the south is undeveloped and used as detention for drainage for the parcel to the north. Access to the site is off Parfet Street to the west and there is an adjacent right-of-way on the southeast side of the site off of 50th Avenue. Ms. Reckert explained to the Commission that staff recommends denial due to the following concerns including: circulation and interior aisle width, landscaping does not include species, building architecture has questionable fagade detail, the minimum for primary and secondary material has not been met. Also, regarding the right-of-way, staff recommends dedication for 501h Avenue to be built during development of Phase 2; the detention for this project should be shifted to not interfere with future construction of 50th Avenue and whether the drainage report indicates that the improvements are adequate to control erosion on the steep slopes. Planning Commission Minutes -3— April 3— April 21, 2016 Ms. Reckert stated staff met with the applicant and their representatives on April 20th regarding the concerns and would like to recommend a continuation until May 19, 2016. Commissioner BUCKNAM asked what the timeline is for the extension on 50th Avenue. Mr. Westberg stated there is not a timeline for the 50th Avenue construction; Public Works would like the right-of-way reserved for the development of Phase 2. Commissioner BUCKNAM also asked if the applicant knows what kind of material staff wants to see for the buildings to be ASDM compliant. Ms. Reckert replied there has been a discussion, but the applicant is hesitant to invest more money on architectural plans. Commissioner DORSEY's only concern at this time is the house in the middle of the property; it seems to hurt the development. Noah Nemmers Baseline Engineering 1950 Ford Street, Golden, CO Mr. Nemmers explained that refinements have been made and said the old house will be staying and will fit in with the architectural style of the rest of the buildings. All the development will be on Lot 1 and they are currently making refinements to Lot 2 to improve the drainage. With regards to staff's concerns, the applicant agreed to reflect the 20 -feet of ROW for 50'1' Avenue on all plans; ROW dedication will be required when Lot 2 develops; pond improvements will be modified; they hope to demonstrate substantial compliance with the architecture criteria; further analyzation of drive aisles. Mr. Nemmers explained that with regards to the materials, the code is being followed and will be amended for clarification on the final set. There is a 1 -foot offset that extends to the roofline that meets the requirement; the treatments are intended to embellish the street facing elevation; the level of fagade detail shown was prepared based on the ASDM requirements for both color and material. The primary materials reflect the 40 % hard coat stucco and it will be above the foundation by at least 6". The secondary materials do not exceed the 60% threshold; and the glazing reflected on the elevations meets the 15% transparency. Southern and eastern drive aisles widths will be 24 -feet and the interior drive lanes will be 22 -feet. The proposed landscaping is in accordance and the correct species have been chosen, just not put in the plan where they will be located. Finally, the tenants will not have access to a dumpster as it would encourage them to dispose of unwanted goods. Commissioner KIMSEY has concerns about the 22 -feet drive aisles. Planning Commission Minutes -4— April 4— April 21, 2016 Commissioner OHM asked about the hours of operation and if the landscaping square footage is 9,928 sq. ft. or 8,095 sq. ft. Mr. Nemmers said the hours of operation will be Monday through Sunday 6am to 9pm, and the landscape plan is correct showing 8,095 sq. ft. Commissioner OHM also had numerous questions regarding the landscaping and lighting that he would like addressed on the landscape and lighting plans by the May 19 meeting. A copy of the list of questions will be given to Mr. Nemmers for review. It was moved by Commissioner WEAVER and seconded by Commissioner DORSEY to continue Case No. PBG -15-01 until May 19, 2016. Motion Carried 7-0 9. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Commissioner DORSEY and seconded by Commissioner KIMSEY to adjourn the meeting at 8:01 p.m. Motion carried 7-0. Scott Ohm, Chair Tammy Odean, Recording Secretary Planning Commission Minutes April 21, 2016 -5— PUBLIC FORUM CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION April 21, 2016 Please sign this roster if you wish to speak on any subject not appearing on the agenda. (Public comment may be limited to three minutes) (Please print) Name Address Crz City of Wh6a-tPsJ(dJge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission CASE MANAGER: M. Reckert DATE: April 21, 2016 CASE NO. & NAME: Case No. PBG-15-01/Parfet Street storage ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a Planned Building Group to allow multiple structures on a single parcel LOCATION OF REQUEST: 5130 Parfet Street APPLICANT: Parfet Street Storage APPROXIMATE AREA: 3.5 acres PRESENT ZONING: Industrial -Employment (I -E) ENTER INTO RECORD: (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) ZONING ORDINANCE (X) DIGITAL PRESENTATION lot ,:.. � , �*�� � rel � •". O 5THWV� Planning Commission PBG-15-01/Parfet Street Storage EXHIBIT I All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to make a decision regarding this request. I. REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a planned building group (PBG) for property zoned Industrial - Employment (I -E) located at 5130 Parfet Street. Pursuant to Section 26-116 of the code of laws, a PBG site plan is required in all zone districts other than planned development and mixed use districts for properties on which more than one primary structure is proposed. An application for more than four main structures requires approval by the Planning Commission at a public hearing. This case will not require review by City Council. Per Section 26-116.D.2., the decision of Planning Commission is final. Appeals from a Planning Commission ruling shall be to the Jefferson County District Court. A formal neighborhood meeting is not required for this application. II. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION/HISTORY The property is located at 5130 Parfet Street, between Ridge Road and W. 50th Avenue extended in the northwest quadrant of the City. The site consists of one developed parcel (Lot 1 or northern portion), and one undeveloped parcel (Lot 2 or southern portion). While Lot 2 does not have structures on it, it functions as detention for the northern lot. Access into the proposed development site is from Parfet Street. The property also abuts the interior intersection of West 501h Avenue and Oak Street. West 501h dead -ends at the southeast corner of the property. The northern portion of the lot (Lot 1) is developed with a single -story 1135 square foot office building, and a detached garage. Other improvements on the northern portion include parking, landscaping and a small, screened outdoor storage area. (Exhibit 1, Aerial Photo) Lot 2 is located to the south of Lot 1 and is undeveloped. Lot 1 is relatively flat and connects to Lot 2 through a steep and narrow sliver of land. Lot 2 has a considerable grade change with an estimated 13% grade at certain points. Both lots are under common ownership and equal approximately 3.5 acres in area. Surrounding properties include a variety of land uses and zoning. To the west is a transmission substation which is zoned A- 1. Abutting the property to the southwest are three parcels (5120, 5110, and 5006 Parfet Street) all zoned Agriculture -One (A-1) with single family, greenhouse and farming uses. To the north and east of the property are developments zoned PID, which have a variety of office/warehouse and manufacturing uses. The property south of Lot 2 is an undeveloped parcel zoned Planned Commercial Development (PCD). (Exhibit 2, Zoning map) The subject property was rezoned from Planned Industrial Development (PID) and Agricultural -One (A-1) to Industrial -Employment (I -E) pursuant to Case No. WZ-14-15. The property was previously used as an electrical contractor's office and storage yard. (Exhibit 3, site photos) Planning Commission PBG-15-01/Parfet Street Storage 2 III. PROPOSED PBG SITE PLAN A planned building group entails site plan review for a parcel with more than one primary structure. Pursuant to Section 26-116.A., the purpose of a PBG is "to promote better overall utilization of a site by promoting improved vehicular and pedestrian circulation and access, more efficient layout of parking and a better overall landscape and architectural design scheme for the total site, while at the same time ensuring adequate standards relation to public health, safety, welfare and convenience in the use and occupancy of buildings and facilities". (Exhibit 4, Reduced copy of PBG) The applicant is proposing to develop the northern portion of the property into a six -building self - storage facility with an office/residence. No development on the south side will occur at this time except for drainage improvements required to accommodate the storage facility's storm water runoff. The original residential building in the interior of the site is proposed to serve as an office and the property manager's residence. The front building (building A) has a 10' build -to line from Parfet Street which is consistent with the standards in the I -E zone district. A 5' setback is provided from the northern property line. Access drive and interior aisle widths Primary access is provided by a curb cut onto Parfet Street which extends to the east into the property. It intersects another major drive aisle east of the office structure. Both of these drive aisles are 24' in width and have been approved by AFPD as fire lanes. Other interior access between buildings is 22' which, in staff's opinion, are too narrow for general circulation around the storage buildings. The City does not have a minimum aisle width for this particular use; however, our research has shown that at a minimum the industry standard is 25'. Many Denver metro municipalities require 30' or more for interior drive aisles for self -storage development. Theses wider widths are required to allow for safe maneuvering of moving truck, often by drivers with infrequent experience driving such vehicles. Access into the site from Parfet Street is controlled by the use of an electronic gate. The gate is inset 40' from Parfet Street so that vehicles have room to pull off the street as they wait for the gate to open. West 50th Avenue extending east from Miller Street dead -ends at the southeast corner of the property. The City is requesting a dedication of 20' for extension of 50th across the southern boundary of the property. Section 26-412 of the Subdivision Regulations requires that "streets shall conform to the requirements set forth in the subdivision regulations, the comprehensive plan, the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan and the Streetscape Design Manual of the City of Wheat Ridge." That dedication would be accomplished by separated instrument. Street construction would occur when Lot 2 develops. See additional discussion further in Section III. of this report. Landscaping Landscaped coverage on the property is indicated at 19% where 10% is required in the I -E zone district. The majority of the landscaped/open space coverage occurs along Parfet, around the office and along the eastern property line. While quantities have been met, exact species have not been identified. Instead the applicant has included a plant list from which plant species can be selected at the time of building permit. Building architecture The building architecture shown on sheets 4 — 9 does not comply with the Heavy Commercial/Industrial design standards specified in the Architectural and Site Design Manual Planning Commission PBG-15-01/Parfet Street Storage 3 (ASDM). These substandard items include fagade detail, fagade articulation, materials, and transparency. Even though the facades on building A are embellished, the standards specified in the ASDM are not being met. The following are excerpts from the ASDM. A. FACADE DESIGN Design Principle: Buildings serving heavy commercial and light industrial uses should include variation and human -scaled components to prevent monotonous and two-dimensional design and to contribute to the character of the community. Section 4.2.A. Design Standard: FaVade Detail: Each fagade shall incorporate at least two of the following elements: reveals, belt courses, cornices, deep overhangs architectural repeating elements of at least 1' in depth, recessed windows, color and /texture differences. Section 4.2.A. Design Standard: Facade Articulation: Each fagade shall have at least one variation in plan depth, a minimum one foot in depth for every 100 linear feet of the length of the fagade such as recessed entries, recess windows and/or storefronts, offsets in the fagade including columns, pilasters, protruding bays, reveals, etc. With regard to facade detail and articulation, the elements shown appear to be "faux" in nature and have not been thoughtfully integrated into a comprehensive design. An example of this is the 1' fagade break that is not carried up into the roof line. B. MATERIALS Design Principle: Buildings should utilize high-quality, durable materials that provide variation and visual interest. Section 4.2.13. Design standards: Materials Primary materials: must comprise 40% of the fagade and must be one of the following materials: brick, stone, textured, colored concrete block or hard coat stucco. Secondary materials: may not exceed 60% of the fagade to include: smooth -faced CMU, EIFS, metal panels or articulated concrete panels. The elevation of building A is shown has having 40% hard coat stucco and 60% metal or other material with 15% transparency but these numbers don't seem accurate nor are they accurately represented on the plan set. Staff has concerns with stucco being utilized adjacent to the ground and potential concerns for long-term durability. The rest of the buildings on the site are composed of metal with wood trim. No accommodation has been made for trash collection on the property. Detention pond and Right -of -Way for West 501h Avenue In 2009, the City adopted Envision Wheat Ridge as its Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan is a document that among other things, acts a tool for guiding development and establishing land use policies Planning Commission PBG-15-01/Parfet Street Storage 4 One of the major components of the plan is Transportation. The Transportation Structure Plan identifies targeted areas for future transportation -related improvements. These improvements focus on improving transportation options and connectivity for all modes of transportation. The plan identifies West 501h Avenue as a proposed roadway from Kipling Street on the east extending to Ward Road on the west. This connection is intended to provide an adequate transportation grid needed to serve the northwest portion of Wheat Ridge. EffIr a MLI The RTD Gold Line commuter railway lies five hundred (500) feet north of the subject property, and there are two rail stations located within about a half -mile of the subject property in Arvada and at theWard Road Station in Wheat Ridge. The Gold Line is scheduled to be open for service this year and upon its opening the importance of the W. 501h connection to the City's transportation grid will become very apparent: • The future W. 501h Avenue will serve as a collector street and requires approximately 60 feet of Right -of -Way to construct to current standards. Planning Commission PBG-15-01/Parfet Street Storage 5 To meet the City's current roadway design standard for a collector street it will necessitate a twenty (20) foot strip of Right -of -Way (ROW) dedication along the south line of the subject property. • The owners of the subject property were made aware of the ROW dedication requirement during the Pre -Application meeting held with City staff on April 16, 2015. This was reiterated to the applicants subsequent to the pre -application as follows: • The 20' strip will need to be dedicated but the construction of the street would not be required with the current development proposal on Lot 1 (the northerly lot). W. 50th Avenue improvements would not be required with development of Lot 1, but rather construction of these improvements would occur upon development of the southerly Lot 2 (development of Lot 2 is currently referred to as "Phase II" by the owners). If drainage modifications are necessary to accommodate the current development, the cost of the design and construction falls back to the developer. Detention Pond Reconstruction An existing stormwater detention pond constructed during a smaller, prior project currently encroaches about five feet into the twenty foot strip of proposed ROW dedication. The civil engineering documents for the current application state that: • The existing detention pond is inadequate in size and must be enlarged to accommodate the current project. The enlargement design of the existing pond includes regrading along the south side of the pond, creating a situation whereby the City must redesign, reconstruct, and re -certify, a privately -owned detention pond in order to complete the future W. 50th Avenue connection. In order to avoid having a private detention pond within public ROW, Public Works has required the pond be regraded in a manner that relocates the south berm of the pond five (5) feet north of the current design. Moving the pond five feet north allows most of the existing pond area to be used in the redesign, while keeping its final location outside of the 20' strip of proposed W. 50th Avenue ROW. The property owners have indicated that they are not will to comply with this requirement, resulting in an encumbrance to a public ROW by a private detention pond. Drainage report The drainage plan for the site does not adequately accommodate the proposed improvements. The proposed drive between Lot 1 and 2 is very steep with approximately a 12% grade. The westerly swale as designed will be prone to erosion. Staff has requested additional erosion control measures to stabilize this area. IV. PLANNED BUILDING GROUP CRITERIA Planning Commission PBG-15-01/Parfet Street Storage 6 In order to approve a planned building group application, the Planning Commission shall consider the criteria listed in Section 26-116.13.3. of the city code. Staff provides the following review and analysis of the criteria: 1. The proposed plan complies with the zoning and development code and is not contrary to the general welfare of the immediate neighborhood and economic prosperity of the city. While the use of the property for self -storage may be appropriate at this location, the design proposed does not provide a benefit to the general health, safety and welfare for either the neighborhood or the northwest portion of the City. The self -storage use, in general, generates minimal tax so there is not a substantial economic benefit. If the dedication for West 501h Avenue does not occur, the goals and objectives of the Transportation portion of the Comprehensive Plan and Subdivision Regulations are not promoted. Further, the conflict with the existing detention pond will be a liability for the City's when the extension of West 50th Avenue is completed. Staff finds that this criterion has not been met. 2. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual (ASDM). The application is not in substantial compliance with the standards set forth in the ASDM with regard to architecture. The architecture of the buildings has not been thoughtfully designed with cohesiveness that results in a benefit to the area. Specific examples include the use of materials which have questionable long term durability and the negative aesthetics of "faux" architectural treatments. There are also concerns from staff regarding the drive aisle widths on-site. The 22' -wide aisle widths are sub -industry standards and no allowances are made for larger turning radii around buildings. Staff finds that this criterion has not been met. V. AGENCY REFERRALS All affected service agencies were contacted regarding their ability to serve the property. The developer will be responsible for any needed upgrades to accommodate the proposed development. Specific referral responses follow. Arvada Fire Protection District: Can serve the property from the 24' wide drive aisles running from Parfet along the southern portion of the property and on the east side of the office. Valley Water District: Can serve. Has a concern about grade issues if and when Lot 2 develops. Wheat Ridge Economic Development: Has indicated that while the storage facility is probably a good use of the property, the elevations on the buildings with frontage need to be more aesthetically appealing. The drive aisles appear inadequate in width for larger vehicles. Planning Commission PBG -1 S-Ol/Parfet Street Storage 7 Wheat Ridge Public Works: Has commented regarding traffic and drainage. These comments were detailed in Section III.of this report. Xcel Energy: Can serve. VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff concludes that the application does not support the general health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood and City and is not in compliance with requirements of the ASDM. Having found the application is in conflict with the goals of the Transportation Structure Plan and Subdivision Regulations, Staff recommends denial of the planned building group with conditions listed below. VII. SUGGESTED MOTIONS: Option A: "I move to DENY Case No. PBG -15-01, a request for approval of a planned building group site plan on property zoned I -E at 5130 Parfet Street, for the following reasons: 1. The design proposed does not support the general health, safety and welfare for the neighborhood and the City. 2. The goals and objectives of the Transportation portion of the Comprehensive Plan and the Subdivision Regulations are not being met. 3. The conflict with the existing detention pond will be a liability for the City's when the extension of West 501h Avenue is completed. 4. The proposal is not in substantial compliance with the ASDM." Option B: "I move to APPROVE Case No. PBG -15-01, a request for approval of a planned building group site plan on property zoned I -E at 5130 Parfet Street, for the following reasons: 1. 2." Planning Commission PBG-15-01/Parfet Street Storage S Exhibit 1 — Aerial Photo Portioubeing developed Planning Commission PBG-15-01/Parfet Street Storage Exhibit 2 — Zoning Map 50TH'AVE Planning Commission PBG-15-01/Parfet Street Storage 10 Exhibit 3 — Site Photos Planning Commission PBG -1 S-Ol/Parfet Street Storage Looking north on Parfet Street — property on the right Looking northeast across the property Access aisle into property from Parfet — office on the left Storage area east of the office Planning Commission PBG-15-01/Parfet Street Storage 12 Looking west where 50'h Avenue dead -ends at the SE corner of the property Looking west toward detention area on Lot 2 Planning Commission PBG-15-01/Parfet Street Storage 13 Exhibit 4 - PBG plan Planning Commission PBG-15-01/Parfet Street Storage 14 PARFET STREET MINI STORAGE PLANNED BUILDING GROUP AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO DECLARATION OF PLANNED BUILDING GROUP 5130 PARFET STREET WHEREAS, PARFET STORAGE LLC HAVE SUBMITTED A PUNNED BUILDING GROUP PUN FOR THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE'S APPROVAL PURSUANT TO WHEAT PoIXi CODE aF UIS, FOR THE LAND AREA LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS: I OT 1 OF PA�t PAltli TRACT 2 REPEAT /2 1 /4 OF ACTION 16 TOWNSHIP 1 �11JTH RAUGE 69 WEST OF ^' PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE COUNTY OF FY:F.- STATE OF COLORADO. WHEREAS, THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE HAS APPROVED SAID PLAN ON NOW, THEREFORE, UPON FINAL APPROVAL OF THE PLANNED BUILDING GROUP BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, THIS DECLARATION IS NOTICE TO PROSPECTIVE PURCHASERS OF THE LAND AREA AND TO ALL OTHERS THAT IT IS THE SUBJECT OF A PLANNED BUILDING GROUP AND THAT SAID RAN AND THE ORDINANCES RELATING THRETO ARE BINDING ON SUBSEQUENT PURCHASERS, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS UNLESS THE PLAN IS ABANONED, AMENDED OR WITHDRAWN IN WRITING AND DULY RECORDED AND SHALL UMIT THE CONSTRUCTION, USE AND OPERATION OF ALL LAND AND STRUCTURES INCLUDED WITHIN SUCH PLANS TO ALL CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS SET FORTH IN SUCH PUNS AND ORDINANCES OWNER: PARFET STORAGE, LLC BY GREGORY A HERBERS AS MEMBER/MANAGER STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS COUNTY OF JEFFERSON ) THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS _ DAY OF A.D. 20_ BY WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL, MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: NOTARY PUBLIC CITY CERTIFICATION APPROVED THIS _ DAY O' ATTEST CITY CLERK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT LMRMILX< BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDERS CERTIFICATE STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss COUNTY OF JEFFERSON ) I HERBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PUT WAS FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER OF JEFFERSON COUNTY AT GDLDEN, COLORADO, AT _ O'CLOCK —M. ON THE _ DAY OF A.D., IN BOOK PAGE RECEPTION NO. JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER I BY: DEPUTY PLANNING COMMMON CERTIFICATION APPROVED THIS _ DAY OF — BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION. I CHAIRPERSON SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I I, ROBERT M. HAYDEN DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARY OF PARFET STREETMINL STORAGE WAS MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. INFORMATION AND BELIEF, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPUCABLE COLORADO STATUES, CURRENT REVISED EDITION AS AMENDED, THE ACCOMPANYING PLAN ACCURATELY REPRESENTS SAID SURVEY. I SURVEYOR S SEAL SIGNATURE ROBERT M. HAYDEN, L.S. 27268 Know what's below. Call before you dig. VICAR MAP SCALE: 1' = 1000' SITE BENCHMARK THE BENCHMARK USED FOR THIS STE IS Na 12409, LOCATED AT N-1713256.48, E= 3109706.48 (NAD83)/ N= 71368&67, E= 110490.93 (CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE DATUM), WITH AT SECTION CORNER DESCRIPTION OF E 1/4, SI6 WHICH IS A 3-1/4' ALUMINUM CAP (LS 23524)IN THE CONCRETE SIDEWALK PATH AN ELEVATION= 5393.92 NFENCCIINNG SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 26-603 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 2. LANDSCAPING SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 26-502 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 3. PARKING SHALL BE CONSISTENT WATH SECTION 26-501 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 4. SITE AND BUILDING LIGHTING SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 26-503 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 5. SIGNAGE SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH ARTICLE VII OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 6. THE BUILDING AND DESIGN STANDARDS WILL FOLLOW THE ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE DESIGN MANUAL. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS CONSIST OF MINI -WAREHOUSE STORAGE UNITS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO THE EXISTING RESIDENCE TO CONVERT IT TO RESIDENCE/ OFFICE SPACE. ACCESS TO THE SITE WILL BE OFF OF PARFET STREET AND A PRIVATE DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS WILL CONSIST OF BUILDING CONSTRUCTION, PAVED ACCESS DRIVES AND ASSOCIATED LANDSCAPING. ARCHITECTURAL- ALL BUILDINGS TO BE CORRUGATED METAL CLAD WITH WOOD ACCENTS IN NATURAL EARTH TONE COLORS. HOURS OF OPERATION ARE FROM 6 AM - 9 PM : MONDAY -SUNDAY THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS FOR THE NORTHERN LOT ONLY AND THAT PRIOR TO ANY SITE DEVELOPMENT ON THE SOUTH, A SITE PLAN PROCESS WILL BE REQUIRED. CASE HISTORY: WZ-12-02 WZ-03-08 MS -02-07 WZ-10-08 MS -10-04 WZ-14-15 PBCr15-O WA -16-02 APPLICANT PARFET STORAGE, L.C. 14995 FOOTHILLS ROAD GOLDEN, GO 80401 CONTACT: GREG HERBERS 303.717.0378 aWDGE RD T +L 1 50TH AVE 50TH AVE 0 PROJECT LOCATION NTE o 70 I 44TH AVE 'BASELINE BASE NE STATE 70 FRONTAG 950 FORD STRREEETING Fngimdng - Planning - Surveying GOLDEN. 00 8040 CONTACT: NOAH HEMMERS, P.E. RD 3003..9/400..9}9�6r6�p/te� 53,155 SF 1.22TOTAL ARCH][1HILT N STEEL BUILDINGSREAL ,r''MAKO 5650 REAL /100 CARD S E E E L VICAR MAP SCALE: 1' = 1000' SITE BENCHMARK THE BENCHMARK USED FOR THIS STE IS Na 12409, LOCATED AT N-1713256.48, E= 3109706.48 (NAD83)/ N= 71368&67, E= 110490.93 (CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE DATUM), WITH AT SECTION CORNER DESCRIPTION OF E 1/4, SI6 WHICH IS A 3-1/4' ALUMINUM CAP (LS 23524)IN THE CONCRETE SIDEWALK PATH AN ELEVATION= 5393.92 NFENCCIINNG SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 26-603 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 2. LANDSCAPING SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 26-502 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 3. PARKING SHALL BE CONSISTENT WATH SECTION 26-501 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 4. SITE AND BUILDING LIGHTING SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 26-503 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 5. SIGNAGE SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH ARTICLE VII OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 6. THE BUILDING AND DESIGN STANDARDS WILL FOLLOW THE ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE DESIGN MANUAL. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS CONSIST OF MINI -WAREHOUSE STORAGE UNITS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO THE EXISTING RESIDENCE TO CONVERT IT TO RESIDENCE/ OFFICE SPACE. ACCESS TO THE SITE WILL BE OFF OF PARFET STREET AND A PRIVATE DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS WILL CONSIST OF BUILDING CONSTRUCTION, PAVED ACCESS DRIVES AND ASSOCIATED LANDSCAPING. ARCHITECTURAL- ALL BUILDINGS TO BE CORRUGATED METAL CLAD WITH WOOD ACCENTS IN NATURAL EARTH TONE COLORS. HOURS OF OPERATION ARE FROM 6 AM - 9 PM : MONDAY -SUNDAY THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS FOR THE NORTHERN LOT ONLY AND THAT PRIOR TO ANY SITE DEVELOPMENT ON THE SOUTH, A SITE PLAN PROCESS WILL BE REQUIRED. CASE HISTORY: WZ-12-02 WZ-03-08 MS -02-07 WZ-10-08 MS -10-04 WZ-14-15 PBCr15-O WA -16-02 APPLICANT PARFET STORAGE, L.C. 14995 FOOTHILLS ROAD GOLDEN, GO 80401 CONTACT: GREG HERBERS 303.717.0378 SHEET MEX CIVIL ENGINEER 'BASELINE BASE NE ZONE DISTRICT: I -E INDUSTRIAL -EMPLOYMENT 950 FORD STRREEETING Fngimdng - Planning - Surveying GOLDEN. 00 8040 CONTACT: NOAH HEMMERS, P.E. LANDSCAPE PLAN 3003..9/400..9}9�6r6�p/te� 53,155 SF 1.22TOTAL ARCH][1HILT BUILDING COVERAGE: STEEL BUILDINGSREAL ,r''MAKO 5650 REAL /100 CARD S E E E L B,EL CA 9 CARLSBAD, CA 92008 OPEN SPACE/LANDSCAPING: 760.448.1760 BUILDING F ELEVATIONS MUNICIPALITY 187 S CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE of 7500 W. 29TH AVENUE Wheat�ge WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 303.234.5900 50-0' (ALLOWED), 9'-4' (PROPOSED), 25'-0' (EXISTING) PARKING SPACES REQUIRED PROVIDED ELECTRIC XcelEnergy XCEL ENERGY 111223 WEST 3��VENUE 7 DENVER, 00 1 2200% CONTACT: DONNA GEORGE NUMBER OF HANDICAP SPACES: 303.57. 3306 100% PIKE PROTECTION ARVADA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT X 7903 ALLISON WAY ARVADA, CO 80005 303.424.3012 SHEET MEX SITE DATA TABLE SHEET TITLE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 1 IN PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION, TRACT 2 REPLAT /2, FOR NORTHERN LOT ONLY ZONE DISTRICT: I -E INDUSTRIAL -EMPLOYMENT C2 ':SITE PLAN SQUARE FEET ACRESEPERCEMNTAGETOTAL LANDSCAPE PLAN AREA OF PROPERTY: 53,155 SF 1.22TOTAL A2 BUILDING COVERAGE: 19,720 SF 0.45TOTAL -BUILDING C ELEVATIONS PARKING/DRIVE COVERAGE 23,507 SF 0.54TOTAL AS OPEN SPACE/LANDSCAPING: 9,928 SF 0.23 BUILDING F ELEVATIONS OFFICE AREA; 187 S ONG RESIDENCE AREA 867 SF BUILDING HEIGHT: 50-0' (ALLOWED), 9'-4' (PROPOSED), 25'-0' (EXISTING) PARKING SPACES REQUIRED PROVIDED PERCENTAGE NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL SPACES 2 2 100% NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES: 1 2200% NUMBER OF HANDICAP SPACES: 1 1 100% SHEET MEX SHEET NO. SHEET TITLE C1 COVER C2 ':SITE PLAN C3 LANDSCAPE PLAN Al BUILDING A ELEVATIONS A2 BUILDING B ELEVATIONS A3 -BUILDING C ELEVATIONS A4 BUILDING D ELEVATIONS AS BUILDING E ELEVATIONS A6 BUILDING F ELEVATIONS E1 PHOTOMETRIC SIT PLAN ONG DRAINAGE PUN 0 Z 0 w w LJ Q a 0 O W ~ r Z N F- r L~J < o LJ F � Ld W a a w � 0 a 0 r U mA�c saE za� x as BEC nwi smcY an: BEC 5/9/15 -- C03208 C1 10' BLDG. SETBACK 10' UTILITY ESMT. EX. UTILITY POLE 50' R.O.W. t a 4.4- OSm PROP6' X 1 T0 CTLNJF MONDMEN PARFET STREET MINI STORAGE PLANNED BUILDING GROUP AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO I �`��(• Q -----(I PROPOSED EMERGENCY 54' ACCESS EASEMENT R15' R15' IX FIRE HYDRANT (TYP.) 35' VALE -Y WATER '�II( DISTRICT ESMT. SHALLOW 222' 0.59 (REC. NO. 76096490) STORAGE N=L712,551.88 e, 5' BLDG. SETBACK UNITS E-3,106,810.60 S 89'49'15' E (325.01') _ _.__.._., 77> s ini v ceurr 0 oo@UIIDNGF 24__ 20' GEAR CREEK WATER & SANITARY SEWER ESMT. (REC. NO. 80045919) 20' VALLEY WATER ---- -- ---- DISTRICT ESMT. (REC. NO. 83012940) 15' DRAINAGE ESMT. -- (REC. NO. 201142920) 5' UTILITY ESMT. N 89'4515' E (203.33') ---- ---------------- � I I I I 20' \\ WATERT ESMT. \ \ FUTURE BUILDINGS(UPON \ AN APPROVAL OF A SITE \ PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION) \ \ 1 SITE PLAN C2 C2 N GRAPHIC SCALE j20 0 20 40 oBn�w B3 24' (IN FEET)— B%9 1 INCH - 20 FT JOB Mn col OIB,, MN¢ 3208—SP Naae 1.Cvg B ¢ 2 a 11 C2 � w s a .S� > 5 K � WNZ r Z O U NOM 1. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY ALL EX CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND O '^ NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF EX. CONDITIONS DIFFER FROM WHAT IS SHOWN ON - �� 2 CONTRACTOR MUST REPAIR ANY DAMAGE AREAS THAT ARE NOT A PART OF OF THE LaGm APPROVED PLANS BACK TO IHS ORIGINAL STATE. ok 2 `J 3. ASPHALT & CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTIONS TO BE REPLACED SHALL MATCH EXISTING PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTIONS. SECTIONS o� _J PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT ,.. r 5. THE MOST CURRENT MUTCD STANDARDS STALL APPLY FOR PARKING STRIPING. rt� w Z m PROPOSED BUILDING PROPOSED LANDSCAPING d PROPOSED LANDSCAPING W a v 6 � z > ffi z PROPERTY BOUNDARY z ®® 8 z 55 -- - - RIGHT OF WAY LINE Li.l LOT LINE R 4000 PS CONCRETE WTH FlBERMESH ----- -- EASEMENT LINE o a a IX EDGE OF ASPHALT o x 3 0 2 3' WIDE CONCRETE PAN EX CURB k GUTTER r m C2 C2 N.T.S. -- PROPOSED 2' CURB h GUTTER 'z IX WOOD FENCE o- PROPOSED GATE N GRAPHIC SCALE j20 0 20 40 oBn�w B3 24' (IN FEET)— B%9 1 INCH - 20 FT JOB Mn col OIB,, MN¢ 3208—SP Naae 1.Cvg B ¢ 2 a 11 C2 � w s a .S� > 5 K � r Z O U NOM 1. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY ALL EX CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND O '^ NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF EX. CONDITIONS DIFFER FROM WHAT IS SHOWN ON w APPROVED PLANS. 2 CONTRACTOR MUST REPAIR ANY DAMAGE AREAS THAT ARE NOT A PART OF OF THE APPROVED PLANS BACK TO IHS ORIGINAL STATE. LLJ C.D 3. ASPHALT & CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTIONS TO BE REPLACED SHALL MATCH EXISTING -0- SECTIONS. SECTIONS a 0f CD 4. QUANTITIES PROVIDED ARE APPROXIMATE, CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY. w r 5. THE MOST CURRENT MUTCD STANDARDS STALL APPLY FOR PARKING STRIPING. rt� w Z 6. ALL RADIUS IS 2 FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. z w < W a v FEkf F- I— Li.l a 0f 4000 PS CONCRETE WTH FlBERMESH -< _ ASPHALT PANNG ., _.. T ASPHALT PANNG a a x 3 0 2 3' WIDE CONCRETE PAN C2 C2 N.T.S. a°P� N GRAPHIC SCALE j20 0 20 40 oBn�w B3 24' (IN FEET)— B%9 1 INCH - 20 FT JOB Mn col OIB,, MN¢ 3208—SP Naae 1.Cvg B ¢ 2 a 11 C2 PARFET STREET MINI STORAGE PLANNED BUILDING GROUP AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE MY OF WHEAT RIDGE � LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ----- SECTION LINE PROPERTY BOUNDARY CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO LOT UNE /J�, \\------- EASEMENT UNE --5124-- IX. MINOR CONTOUR ----5125-- EX. MAJOR CONTOUR —5124— PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR ---_--__ _--1 1\ I — PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR PROPOSED EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT 3V VALLEY WATER I i (REC. NO. 78096490) _ 1 S 89'49'15' E (325.01') / _ _ I I 11 SHADE TREE ° 5' URUT`E91T. 3,875 BUILDING F DSTo- UTIUTY ESMT. SHRUBS ���j((`V' o I \ ..,,, -- --.. / ,/ i i I I 1 +----- -�\ \\ i i `'f RDCK MULCH 2' /50'>' _ II _ 1 / 1 `oT ° oP y, ° i i 25' VALLEY WATER I 1 1 S �- ---- NATIVE SEED MIX ` EX. RESIDENCE; @ 1 I I I _ .. a DISTRICT ESMT.�q(•,,. _ \ S BUIL1NtlG_B. BUILDING C ° G 1,2805E 2BUILDINGE i (REC. N0. 78096490) \ dG7 ASPHALT II •� ° °� / 3,800 SF / UM SF Z40D SF ° °'° Y< �' � I r . I I . O S I � / I � i 1 _ L- I � y I s UTILITY ---- ESMTF- -1 ILI 1-1 I10',U1NTYI \\\ NOTE:1. ALL LANDSCAPED AREA SHALL BE SERVED BY A ZONED, AUTOMATIC II I I I \ I IRRIGATION SYSTEM. I I I I 1 \ 2. INDIVIDUAL TREE AND SHRUB SPECIES WALL BE ESTABLISHED BY A LANDSCAPE TI I I I 1 \\ I PLAN AND APPROVED BY STAFF DURING THE BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW PROCESS. 3. NON-UVING MATERIAL SHALL BE LIMITED TO 35X NON -LIVING LANDSCAPING VAL1 NOT EXCEED 35% OF THE TOTAL LANDSCAPED COVERAGE III I I \ S Si III Il II \\\ 1 I I I I \ «<5'<UTILITY ESMT. - �/,REC. NO. 2011042920)` 5' UTILITY ESMT. - /// REC. NO. 2011042920) __-- I DRAINAGE ESYT. -(REC, N0. 2011042920) 1/- � , •_ � -- O LANDSCAPE TABLE PER Sec 26-502 LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED PROVIDED OPEN SPACE 7,971 SF 8,095 SF MAXIMUM PERCENT LANDSCAPED COVERAGE 35% 19S STREET TREES• 5 5 ON-SITE TREES • 8 8 ON-SITE SHRUBS' 80 81 I -TREES AND SHRUBS TO BE FROM THE SELECTED PLANT UTST NOTED BELOW PLANT LIST DUAN. SYM, GOMMONlBOTANICAI NAME SIZE REMARKS 20' CLEAR CREEK WATER A \ TREES SANITARY SEWER ESMT. \ AG AUTUMN DRaUANCE SERVKCEeERRY TNT. FULL CROWN, STAKED (REC. NO. 80045919) \� AmeWctit+•pa°dAon•Aa„nBliaac! uTRUNKS BaesPEc.ouAun MBSP & BP IIIPME 611T. NM.STAKED A- 20' VALLEY WATER ---- - - - - - -80 P ITY SPEC. DUALITY \ \1 DISTRICT ESMT. w R,PERaLNa€noc xscAL. FUu� (REC. N0. 8301294- pK�, S CAL Bae SPEC QUAUTY FVLL FN01YN, STAKED \ _----- _ 15' DRAINAGE ESMT. -_ _ -= RP RED POwTE MAPLE 2 IK NT eAT cRouvN sTAI�D _WIN�- -;(REC. NO. 201142920)-_------ WIN OR G KGO BaORA K„ eSe SPEC"L” _ _— _.—r+' �� WATER —._ URUtt ESMT._--_-_-_--_. W GHANTMAEER PEAR 2S CAL FULLFRC. OUASTAKED SPEc.OUAutt TY 1 k SANITATION /- _5' - N- 89301'i E (203.33 n+ . TOGA NavrtNorw zs ca.. eaB FUS ATAKED DISTRICT ESMT.� GaMepS•mw0•Aelsia TcpA' PEC D, BBB SPEC DUAL" L" --_-- =__ -----�_� — _ _ —_s__---- —_�--—— / SHRUBS BM BLUE MIST SFVEA 5 GAL. P SPACING Kit PIAN— -__ C.-'I, FM FORM __-----_-- _—_—. / CL SPI GREEN COMPACT CRAMBERRY GP C_I 5DAL. SPACING PER PIAN FULL FORM / _ — — — --— G�------_---_ r_7'_I— �--_—/ OB VICI•�xin trbE,An'Sgvq DWARF BURNING BUSH 5GAl. SPACING PER PIAN / / GROW GIW1 5T lAluC 5GAL. FULLFORM SPACING PERftAN / G5 -lam RMaaa°MIra YLw FULL FORM PLAT 20 / / WATER—������yyyI/ / MK MLSS qN UTAC SY.+w p—. -K.,.' 5 GAL SPACING PER FIU FORM \ R, „p ESMT. 1 �0'`\ r PF RB wR POP TEN'IL C� ROSYGLOWSAPBERRY GAL S. 5CAL SPACING®moi OC FULL FORM SPACING PER PLA! En C„Md—Time FULL FIXW V SP GOLOFWAE SPIREA 5GAI_ SPACINGPER PLAN +! \ / SPS `G� FULL FORM FULL CROIIM, STAKED / FUTURE BUILDINGS(UPON / / \ AN APPROVAL OF A SITE SJ BLUE ARROW A RMR S• NT Bae SPEC. OUAUTY PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION) N GRAPHIC SCALE 1 LANDSCAPE PLAN 20 0 20 40 C3 C3 (IN FEET) 1 INCH = 20 FT 6 Z > 6 Z Z 5 J Z Phase C3 PARFET STREET MINI STORAGE PLANNED BUILDING GROUP AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LOCATED IN THE SOUTWEST OF SECTION 16, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO 11-11 [ AAIn nnnr TRIM COLOR: RUST BUILDING A - EAST (FRONT) ELEVATION 1-11 nnl nD. DI ICT rAl/r 1AIIAIr\n1AlC Irl A71NI!` (TVD` BUILDING A - WEST (REAR) ELEVATION SOUTH Unum SWImalm wjmw aj. mo. = M HAUMT SMM/ROM = 40% I MAUOTM = 60% 1' BUILDING OFFSET 1' EACH WAY TAN WALL AND ROOF COLOR ON CORNERS RUNNING BOARD AND BATTEN COLOR: BROWN STAIN ALL BOTTOMS HARDCOAT STUCCO COLOR: RUST BUILDING A - ENDWALL ELEVATIONS NORTH lFEY RY 91MY MlE GRAPHIC SCALE BEC 5 0 5 10 ,m 11u pEl tr (IN FEET) 32M zoe Ei�wl� 1 INCH = 5 FT 4 PARFET STREET MINI STORAGE PLANNED BUILDING GROUP AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LOCATED IN THE SOUTWEST OF SECTION 16, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO 1".. i I .yin nnnr, COLOR: TAN SOUTH BUILDING B - EAST (FRONT) ELEVATION BUILDING B - WEST (REAR) ELEVATION BUILDING B - ENDWALL ELEVATIONS F NORTH I a GRAPHIC SCALE 5 0 5 10 eec ,oa hu r -1-7 o 1 INCH = 5 FT v„ wn xucF IG1 PARFET STREET MINI STORAGE PLANNED BUILDING GROUP AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LOCATED IN THE SOUTWEST OF SECTION 16, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO TRIM COLOR: RUST BUILDING C - WEST (FRONT) ELEVATION SOUTH BUILDING C - EAST (REAR) ELEVATION BUILDING C - ENDWALL ELEVATIONS DOORS COLOR: TAN a VJ NORTH OFd GRAPHIC SCALE 5 0 5 10 (IN FEET) 1 INCH = 5 FT N a¢r 6 11 A3 PARFET STREET MINI STORAGE PLANNED BUILDING GROUP AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LOCATED IN THE SOUTWEST OF SECTION 16, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO IIIA, I c Akin onnr Tn1/ u-1— COLOR: TAN BUILDING D - EAST (FRONT) ELEVATION BUILDING D - WEST (REAR) ELEVATION i BUILDING D - ENDWALL ELEVATIONS GRAPHIC SCALE 5 0 5 10 (IN FEET) I INCH - 5 FT a — 76 11 A4 PARFET STREET MINI STORAGE PLANNED BUILDING GROUP AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LOCATED IN THE SOUTWEST OF SECTION 16, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO uiei i r —n ❑/\/1C Tnw COLOR: TAN BUILDING E - EAST (FRONT) ELEVATION BUILDING E - WEST (REAR) ELEVATION BUILDING E - ENDWALL ELEVATIONS z O U Z O N w a Q 0 w NWz I F w LU � Z H— w a � Q ww a 3 O U GRAPHIC SCALE 5 0 5 10 acc .m •n (IN FEET) 1 INCH = 5 FT �soa Elewtion A5 PARFET STREET MINI STORAGE PLANNED BUILDING GROUP AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LOCATED IN THE SOUTWEST OF SECTION 16, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO BUILDING F - SOUTH (FRONT) ELEVATION (WEST HALF) VCOLORvv J : TAN BUILDING F - SOUTH (FRONT) ELEVATION (EAST HALF BUILDING F - NORTH (REAR) ELEVATION (EAST HALF) BUILDING F - NORTH (REAR) ELEVATION (WEST HALF) BUILDING F - ENDWALL ELEVATIONS MATCH LINE COLOR: BROWN STAIN COLOR: RUST W N Z _ J � a W m MATCH LINE "' 0 o d GRAPHIC SCALE 5 0 5 10 (IN FEET) 1 INCH = 5 FT PARFET STREET MINI STORAGE PLANNED BUILDING GROUP AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LOCATED IN THE SOUTWEST OF SECTION 16, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, r.ITY OF WHEAT RIDGE. COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO U.c Ic b.0 b.o b.0 b.c U.o b.o b.c b.0 b.o o.c 0.0 b.o b.c b.o 5.o o.c U.0 b.o 0.o b.o b.o 0.0 b..a_^ n b.o 1I.0 U.o 0.0 b.o b.o b.1 b.o b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.o b.o b.o b.o b.c 0.0 b.a b.0 b.o 0.0 b.o 0.0 b.o b.o U.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b:o b.0 b.0 b.o b.0 0.1 b.l U.o b.o b.o b.a o.o b.a b.o b.o b.l b.l b.o b.o 0.0 0.0 b.o b.o b.o b.o c.o b.0 b.o b.0 t *0 i•4 ' b.z b.3 5.0 T.3 OPERATION, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. / '. ! U/i I b.0 U.o /4.1 i.2 �.2 b.1 b.c cl 4.z b b b.1 b.a a.s b.4 / b.l b.o .1 .1 b.o b.o b.l U.o b.0%I b.6 b.o BUILDING F U.o b.o b 6 .2 b.7 b.5 b.5b.3 b.2 b.2 .1 ° 6.5 0.1 i.3 1.9 1.6 i b.9 1 1 0.o b b 1.2 '1.3 i.1 1.3 1.2 1.2 X1.0 2.7 '2.6 '2.4 1.5/b.6 0.8 11.3 b.6 .4 b.2 i.e 0.6 6.S 5.0 6.2 b i.0 i.': EW4 b.b i0.6 b.� 3 /1.66 .tl ,' S.] S 3 b.0 b 0 0 2 b.7 b.S 3.a %.9 6.3 r3. �. EW3 EW3 EW4 I'f.3 -. b.0 b 0 5 b 5 6 : 4 '. :. 4 .5 i9{ 6 6 7 6 <] b.5 6 5 6 4 3 b EW3 EW3 EW3 E 0.0 b 0 b BUILDING Q 6 9 4 3 4 ' 6 9 6.5 .9 •6 .3 0 i '8 QN - E '0.0 b a b 6 b B b 2 i i S 6'3 WILDING BUILDING B EW3 BUILCING - C •b 9 3.9 <. < BUILDING D 3 7 1 -4 BUILDING E 1I.0 b 0 b z b fi ; s b.o b 0 b EW3 F a 4 '2 b. 4 7 2. 'S.3 •'3 9 6 6 1 EW3 t•6 E , M •. 0.0 b0 b 96 i' 3 b7 5 6 2 '9S a 4 EW3 1- 12- 9 3 -S 1.5 DS _. .__.. -6 S .6 g .0 3.8 1.5 I 4.c -.. •-EW3--� _ "" EW3 0.2 b i e 54 �r.r -z �4.s-'z-r �-�WaWa -4.� a �T.s' ta�i.r" i:a -i.a- 5-5 �U.a .s - z.i 17-3 -5.1- Fa 0.2 b 9 b.5 /0.5 .4 b.e U.] o.v b.4 b.s b.6 b.e o.7 b. .4 b.5 b.6 0.4 b.s b.6 0.4 b.s 0.7 i.° b.s b,a, U. f b.1 b.l b.l b.1 b., b.l 0.1 b.l b.l b.l b.1 b.2 b.2 b.1 0.1 b.1 b.1 b.2 0.2 b.2 0.2 b.1 0.1 b.l 0.2 b.2 0.2 b. 5.o b.0 U.0 b.o b.o b.o b.o 0.0 b.o b.a b.l b.l b.l b.l b.c b.o b.o b.o b.l 0.1 b.1 b.1 U.1 b.o b.l b.l b.3 U.1 b. b LAREDO s'1.' Mm5cMule �..�..� SERIES ¢EW3. EW4 ..... Lw+�-3aLBn ZV8'A'AIMBB !1]pCJ>Y W' .orwc��e�wmn M4'a •sav mpwq ,i ��Ms�r.rmwY o�eM�� swmm w „µaveamn'' ..sap�um�6mewbmv.m 7o� _ ® 1 ,ws mm, rumml aRUI9W MFMUUnW anerB n..e c 111GIIU9-t1-NNl Lmc �...rms,nmr 4nw1 a Wan va.,aw BfB�B � m.�4 atugsw wsv Ju�""'v°ron mmw f11r• �� ' r Bwr�r�ss >e+K�aK SeYBe,=M,V •fm rruavloen. �B:a®� MWr �'�� ��" swwe�nr�a�rr.n�.r.r���rw�•w�.® PHOTOMETRIC SITE PLAN E0.1 SCALE: 1' = 20"-0' �E LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE KEY QUANTITY LAMP b.o b.o b o b.0 b.0 CATALOG NUMBER b.0 b.0 b.o b.0 o LED WALL MOUNTED LED FIXTURE. FULL CUT-OFF. SURFACE I 0.1 b.l b. b.a b.c b.2 b.2 b 1 b.0 b.o b.9 b.5 .2 b.1 b.c 11.6 i.0 b.2 I b.3 b.o 1.1 1.3 b 2 b.0 b.c i.e `,.2 b.1 0.0 b.0 •1.6 t.3 b.l b.l b Z PHOTOMETRIC VALUES. 2 b.l .0 5.3 1.4 .2 b.a b.o 1.5 i•4 ' b.z b.3 5.0 T.3 OPERATION, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. / '. ! U/i I b.0 U.o /4.1 i.2 �.2 b.1 b.c 4.z b b b.1 b.a a.s b.4 / b.l b.o .1 .1 b.o b.o b.l U.o b.0%I b.6 b.o LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE KEY QUANTITY LAMP DESCRIPTION MOUNTING MOUNTING HEIGHT MANUFACTURER CATALOG NUMBER VOLTS NOTES EW3 21 LED WALL MOUNTED LED FIXTURE. FULL CUT-OFF. SURFACE 10'-0" SPAULDING {LLMC-30LU-4K-3-i 120/277 1 aW 4000K TYPE III DISTRIBUTION. BRONZE FINISH. A.F.G. LIGHTING 1. BUILDING MOUNTED FIXTURES SHALL BE IESNA FULL EW4 4 LED WALL MOUNTED LED FIXTURE. FULL CUT-OFF. SURFACE 10'-0' SPAULDING LLMC-30LU-4K-4-1 120/277 1 3, EXTERIOR LIGHTING ON EXISTING BUILDING IS EXISTING 4000K TYPE N DISTRIBUTION. BRONZE FINISH. TO REMAIN, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EXISTING A.F.G. LIGHTING LIGHTING CONTRIBUTION IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE Z ] Z NOTCS: 1. COORDINATE FIXTURE FINISH WITH THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ROUGH -IN. z 0 0 L LJ CD ckfQ a 0 W 1- C7 Nwa _ � J Z CL N to O W d p E cif F- cn H - w a � a a _EC 0 s 3 0 v Brw BEC 5/9/15 JOB xo. C03208 CMM11B NIIQ E1 W m � Z m W2 U A aW ¢LL GENERAL NOTES: 1. BUILDING MOUNTED FIXTURES SHALL BE IESNA FULL CUTOFF. d 2. EXTERIOR FIXTURES SHALL BE UL LISTED FOR WET LOCATION. 3, EXTERIOR LIGHTING ON EXISTING BUILDING IS EXISTING TO REMAIN, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EXISTING LIGHTING CONTRIBUTION IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE Z ] Z PHOTOMETRIC VALUES. 8� Z F Z 4. LIGHT FIXTURES TYPE 'EW3' AND 'EW4' SHALL OPERATE FROM DUSK TO DAWN FOR SECURITY VIA PHOTO CELL AND ASTRONOMICAL TIMECLOCK FOR 'ON'/'OFF' OPERATION, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. D m a z 0 0 L LJ CD ckfQ a 0 W 1- C7 Nwa _ � J Z CL N to O W d p E cif F- cn H - w a � a a _EC 0 s 3 0 v Brw BEC 5/9/15 JOB xo. C03208 CMM11B NIIQ E1 PARFET STREET MINI STORAGE PLANNED BUILDING GROUP AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LOCATED IN THE SOUTWEST OF SECTION 16, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO FES / h��T�51 I+M0)�� 5 UTIUTY ESMT. a --- i- -REC. NO. 2011042920) DRAINAGE ESMT. �- ��--�'i -(REC. NO. 201I042920) it r/-�1 I / / /mss-- --- -III `h\- 11 ---/ / .�..� HISTORIC DRAINAGE BASIN BOUNDARY -----5116, - - - - EX. MINOR CONTOUR — -5115- — - EX. MAJOR CONTOUR -1► FLOW DIRECTION, TYPICALLY ON PAVED SURFACES QDESIGN POINT DESIGNATION 11 J1 e I 35' VALLEY WATER 1- \I •i I ' 1 I I / DISTRICT ESMT. ////✓I�/�� Ii� i `I / (REC. N0. 78096490) —5,55 28, I---� 1 1 IIII OS-� .,v 5455 Q �0.10Q� \I�I'- 11 1\ \\i �I�II /lam 0.040 5 UTILITY ESMT.;:;::"'ji �_-- \ I 1 I I I 10' unuTr esz-#- 26 �I \ i I II11, 1 ESMT. 25' VALLEY WATER ~ - +^ . i I DISTRICT E511T. 1 1 1\ ;.. ((REC. N0. 78096490) 1� /� till/�60 � �l O.W. / j11o�uTUTr\7 ���►�� ,1�lljl�l/�l I ; \ � � J \\ � �` S/ Ilf''ESMr. PROPOSED 4• L' '/■L�� III l -\\ III'llll�� - / 469 UNDERDRAN GAP IN CLEAR ilrll�1 CREEK WATER / 11 4 SANITATION 141' (DISTRICT ESMT. 20• CLEAR CREEK WATER k 1/l'1111(III I_"--_- •'-'��-i1— -mac - /I SANITARY SEWER ESMT. I /•/'j�Iit (REC. N0. 80045919) jl�i 1I 11(1111 -/ ' �'---/ a 1 'S ESMT. '_ GRAPHIC SCALE 1 HISTORIC DRAINAGE PLAN w ° 40 80 DNG DNG (IN FEET) 1 INCH - 40 FT 26- , / 5425 s• UTILITY ESMT + I_¢Iy. a/ '0 / /% - REC/ NO. 2011042920) �-! ! �. / /' \• ///// ,1N" 5' UnUTY ESMT. / -29--EG '\ / -RNi 2011042920) e719 --- _ --' DRAINAGE ESMT. _ - - S l -moi -(REC. NO. 2011042920) 111/��_ I I _\-// / /� / ----- / It 1 1 / / .0 �.. �..�..� PROPOSED DRAINAGE BASIN BOUNDARY -----5118----- EX. MINOR CONTOUR -5120- — - EX. MAJOR CONTOUR 5118 PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR 5120 PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR Storage Requiamemhom Sime) 'Full -Sp -W -m: 038 0.55 acre4l. IN GRAPHIC SCALE 1 DEVELOPED DRAINAGE PLAN 40 0 40 Bo DNG DNG (IN FEET) 1 INCH - 40 FT 6 z > b z z � � z 1208-CIWI Ph. Ld g aacr 11 ai 11 DNG PARFET STREET MINI STORAGE PLANNED BUILDING GROUP AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE DECLARATION OF PLANNED BUILDING GROUP WHEREAS, PARFET STORAGE LLC HAVE SUBMITTED A PLANNED BUILDING GROUP PLAN FOR THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE'S APPROVAL PURSUANT TD WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS, FOR THE LAND AREA LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS T OT 1 OF PAST P Rlt A T AT (j, SW 1/4 OF SECTION 16 TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH RANGE 69 WEST OF 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN. CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE COUNTY OF n?T_RS77N. STATE OF COLORADO. WHEREAS, THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE HAS APPROVED SAID PLAN ON NOW, THEREFORE, UPON FINAL APPROVAL OF THE PLANNED BUILDING GROUP BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, THIS DECLARATION IS NOTICE TO PROSPECTIVE PURCHASERS OF THE LAND AREA AND TO ALL OTHERS THAT IT IS THE SUBJECT OF A PLANNED BUILDING GROUP AND THAT SAID PLAN AND THE ORDINANCES RELATING THRETO ARE BINDING ON SUBSEQUENT PURCHASERS, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS UNLESS THE PLAN IS ABANONED, AMENDED OR WITHDRAWN IN WRITING AND DULY RECORDED AND SHALL UMIT THE CONSTRUCTION, USE AND OPERATION OF ALL LAND AND STRUCTURES INCLUDED WITHIN SUCH PLANS TO ALL CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS SET FORTH IN SUCH PLANS AND ORDINANCES. OWNER: PARFET STORAGE, LLC BY GREGORY A HERBERS AS MEMBER/MANAGER STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS COUNTY OF JEFFERSON ) THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS _ DAY OF A.D. 20_ BY WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL MY COMMISSION EXPIRES NOTARY PUBLIC CITY CERTIFICATION APPROVED THIS _ DAY OF ATTEST CITY CLERK BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDERS CERTIFICATE STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS COUNTY OF JEFFERSON ) I HERBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER OF JEFFERSON COUNTY AT GOLDEN, COLORADO, AT O'CLOCK —M. CN THE _ DAY OF A.D., IN BOON — PAGE — RECEPTION NO. JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER BY: _ DEPUTY PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION APPROVED THIS _ DAY OF _ BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION. CHAIRPERSON SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I, ROBERT M. HAYDEN 00 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARY OF PAST STREET MR STORAGE WAS MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF, IN ACCORDANCE METH ALL APPLICABLE COLORADO STATUES, CURRENT REVISED EDITION AS AMENDED, THE ACCOMPANYING PLAN ACCURATELY REPRESENTS SAID SURVEY. SURVEYORS SEAL SIGNATURE ROBERT M. HAYDEN, LS. 27268 Know what's below. Cal I before you dig. LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO 5130 PARFET STREET VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1' = low SITE BENCHMARK THE BENCHMARK USED FOR THIS SITE IS NGS 12409, LOCATED AT N=1713256.48. E- 3109706.48 (NAD83)/ N= 713688.67, E= 110490.93 (CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE DATUM), WITH AT SECTION CORNER DESCRIPTION OF E 1/4, Sib WHICH IS A 3-1/4' ALUMINUM CAP (LS 23524)IN THE CONCRETE SIDEWALK WITH AN ELEVATION= 5393.92 NFENCING SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 26-603 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 2. LANDSCAPING SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 26-502 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 3. PARKING SHALL BE CONSISTENT VWTH SECTION 26-501 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 4. SITE AND BUILDING LIGHTING SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 26-503 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 5. SIGNAGE SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH ARTICLE VII OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 6. THE BUILDING AND DESIGN STANDARDS WILL FOLLOW THE ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE DESIGN MANUAL 7. SITE SIGNAGE SHALL NOTE THAT 'COMMERCIAL VEHICLE ACCESS IS LIMITED TO VEHICLES UNDER 17 FEET IN LENGTH'. RIGHT -0F WAY RESERVATION A TWENTY FOOT NIDE STRIP OF LAND LOCATED ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF LOT 2, PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION, TRACT 2 REPLAT IS HEREBY RESERVED AS PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR THE FUTURE CONSTRUCTION OF WEST 50TH AVENUE NO BUILDING, DETENTION/DRAINAGE FACILITIES, OR OTHER PERMANENT STRUCTURES SHALL BE ALLOWED WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THE RESERVATION AREA. THE OWNER SHALL RETAIN THE RIGHT TO USE SAID RESERVATION AREA UNTIL SUCH TIME AS LOT 2, PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION, TRACT 2 REPLAT #2 DEVELOPS. AT THE TIME OF SAID LOT 2 DEVELOPMENT THE RIGHT-OF-WAY RESERVATION AREA SHALL BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE AS PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CITY SEEKS TO CONSTRUCT WEST 50TH AVENUE PRIOR TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF SAID LOT 2, THE OWNER, HEIRS, AND ASSIGNS AGREES TO SELL SAID RESERVATION AREA TO THE CITY AT FAIR MARKET VALUE WEST 50TH AVENUE PUBLIC IIWIPROVBMENTS CONSTRUCTION OF OR FEES IN LIEU OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ACROSS THE WEST 50TH AVENUE FRONTAGE SHALL BE REQUIRED AT THE TIME OF DEVELOPMENT OF LOT 2, PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION, TRACT 2 REPLAT #2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS CONSIST OF MINI -WAREHOUSE STORAGE UNITS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO THE EXISTING RESIDENCE TO CONVERT IT TO RESIDENCE/ OFFICE SPACE ACCESS TO THE SITE WILL BE OFF OF PARFET STREET AND A PRIVATE DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS WILL CONSIST OF BUILDING CONSTRUCTION, PAVED ACCESS DRIVES AND ASSOCIATED LANDSCAPING. ARCHITECTURAL- ALL BUILDINGS TO BE CORRUGATED METAL CLAD WITH WOOD ACCENTS IN NATURAL EARTH TONE COLORS. HOURS OF OPERATION ARE FROM 6 AM - 9 PM : MONDAY -SUNDAY THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS FOR THE NORTHERN LOT ONLY AND THAT PRIOR To ANY SITE DEVELOPMENT ON THE SOUTH, A SITE PLAN PROCESS WALL BE REQUIRED. APPLICANT PARFET STORAGE, LLC. 14995 FOOTHILLS ROAD GOLDEN, CO 80401 CONTACT: GREG HERSERS 303.717.0378 50TH AVE PROJECT LOCATION 44TH AVE 50TH AVE U N 70 7500 W. 29TH AVENUE Wheat R 1` � WHEAT RIDGE. CO 80033 3��0�3.2��34.5�/900pp��/� SITE PLAN ddd a PERCENTAGE Fr r �..� CfW- STATE 70 FRONTAL RD N 37.0% e 23,507 SF 0.54 1950 VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1' = low SITE BENCHMARK THE BENCHMARK USED FOR THIS SITE IS NGS 12409, LOCATED AT N=1713256.48. E- 3109706.48 (NAD83)/ N= 713688.67, E= 110490.93 (CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE DATUM), WITH AT SECTION CORNER DESCRIPTION OF E 1/4, Sib WHICH IS A 3-1/4' ALUMINUM CAP (LS 23524)IN THE CONCRETE SIDEWALK WITH AN ELEVATION= 5393.92 NFENCING SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 26-603 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 2. LANDSCAPING SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 26-502 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 3. PARKING SHALL BE CONSISTENT VWTH SECTION 26-501 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 4. SITE AND BUILDING LIGHTING SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 26-503 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 5. SIGNAGE SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH ARTICLE VII OF THE WHEAT RIDGE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE. 6. THE BUILDING AND DESIGN STANDARDS WILL FOLLOW THE ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE DESIGN MANUAL 7. SITE SIGNAGE SHALL NOTE THAT 'COMMERCIAL VEHICLE ACCESS IS LIMITED TO VEHICLES UNDER 17 FEET IN LENGTH'. RIGHT -0F WAY RESERVATION A TWENTY FOOT NIDE STRIP OF LAND LOCATED ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF LOT 2, PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION, TRACT 2 REPLAT IS HEREBY RESERVED AS PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR THE FUTURE CONSTRUCTION OF WEST 50TH AVENUE NO BUILDING, DETENTION/DRAINAGE FACILITIES, OR OTHER PERMANENT STRUCTURES SHALL BE ALLOWED WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THE RESERVATION AREA. THE OWNER SHALL RETAIN THE RIGHT TO USE SAID RESERVATION AREA UNTIL SUCH TIME AS LOT 2, PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION, TRACT 2 REPLAT #2 DEVELOPS. AT THE TIME OF SAID LOT 2 DEVELOPMENT THE RIGHT-OF-WAY RESERVATION AREA SHALL BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE AS PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CITY SEEKS TO CONSTRUCT WEST 50TH AVENUE PRIOR TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF SAID LOT 2, THE OWNER, HEIRS, AND ASSIGNS AGREES TO SELL SAID RESERVATION AREA TO THE CITY AT FAIR MARKET VALUE WEST 50TH AVENUE PUBLIC IIWIPROVBMENTS CONSTRUCTION OF OR FEES IN LIEU OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ACROSS THE WEST 50TH AVENUE FRONTAGE SHALL BE REQUIRED AT THE TIME OF DEVELOPMENT OF LOT 2, PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION, TRACT 2 REPLAT #2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS CONSIST OF MINI -WAREHOUSE STORAGE UNITS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO THE EXISTING RESIDENCE TO CONVERT IT TO RESIDENCE/ OFFICE SPACE ACCESS TO THE SITE WILL BE OFF OF PARFET STREET AND A PRIVATE DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS WILL CONSIST OF BUILDING CONSTRUCTION, PAVED ACCESS DRIVES AND ASSOCIATED LANDSCAPING. ARCHITECTURAL- ALL BUILDINGS TO BE CORRUGATED METAL CLAD WITH WOOD ACCENTS IN NATURAL EARTH TONE COLORS. HOURS OF OPERATION ARE FROM 6 AM - 9 PM : MONDAY -SUNDAY THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS FOR THE NORTHERN LOT ONLY AND THAT PRIOR To ANY SITE DEVELOPMENT ON THE SOUTH, A SITE PLAN PROCESS WALL BE REQUIRED. APPLICANT PARFET STORAGE, LLC. 14995 FOOTHILLS ROAD GOLDEN, CO 80401 CONTACT: GREG HERSERS 303.717.0378 1,,IAl ,- _4I1 /' CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE �uF 7500 W. 29TH AVENUE Wheat R 1` � WHEAT RIDGE. CO 80033 3��0�3.2��34.5�/900pp��/� SITE PLAN ddd a PERCENTAGE CMI. ENGINEER �..� CfW- 1( ENERGY 1123123 NEST 3RD AVENUE 'BASELINE N� ENGINEERING 37.0% e 23,507 SF 0.54 1950 TOTAL OPEN SPACE/LANDSCAPING FIRE PROTECTION • %� _ �� GOLDEN. CO 60401 CONTACT: NOAH NEMMERS, P.E. 187 SF 0 0 RESIDENCE AREA: 303.940.9966 m 50'-0' (ALLOWED), 9"-4' (PROPOSED), 25'-0' (EXISTING) ARCHr[ECT REQUIRED PROVIDED W z SM O MARO STEEL BUILDINGS 100% NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES: 1 2 5650 EL CAMINO REAL /100 NUMBER OF HANDICAP SPACES: a S T H H L CARLSBAD, CA 92008 760.448.1760 1,,IAl ,- _4I1 /' CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE �uF 7500 W. 29TH AVENUE Wheat R 1` � WHEAT RIDGE. CO 80033 3��0�3.2��34.5�/900pp��/� SITE PLAN SQUARE FEET ACRES PERCENTAGE ELE AlL C �..� CfW- 1( ENERGY 1123123 NEST 3RD AVENUE /HCWC11C DENVER, CO 80223 37.0% CONTACT: DONNA GEORGE 23,507 SF 0.54 303.57.3306 TOTAL OPEN SPACE/LANDSCAPING FIRE PROTECTION 19.0% ARVADA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 187 SF 7903 ALUSON WAY RESIDENCE AREA: ARVADA, 00 80005 303.424.3012 SHEET INDEX SITE DATA TABLE SHEET TITLE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 1 IN PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION, TRACT 2 REPLAT #2, FOR NORTHERN LOT ONLY ZONE DISTRICT: I -E INDUSTRIAL-DAPLOYME14T C2 SITE PLAN SQUARE FEET ACRES PERCENTAGE TOTAL AREA OF PROPERTY: 53.155 SF 1.22 100% TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE 19,720 SF 0.45 37.0% TOTAL PARKING/DRIVE COVERAGE 23,507 SF 0.54 44.0% TOTAL OPEN SPACE/LANDSCAPING 9,928 SF 0.23 19.0% OFFICE AREA: 187 SF ONG RESIDENCE AREA: 867 SF BUILDING HEIGHT: 50'-0' (ALLOWED), 9"-4' (PROPOSED), 25'-0' (EXISTING) PARKING SPACES REQUIRED PROVIDED PERCENTAGE NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL SPACES: 2 2 100% NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES: 1 2 2005 NUMBER OF HANDICAP SPACES: 1 1 1005 SHEET INDEX SHEET NO. SHEET TITLE Cl COVER C2 SITE PLAN C3 LANDSCAPE PLAN Al -BUILDING A ELEVATIONS A2 BUILDING B ELEVATIONS A3 BUILDING C ELEVATIONS A4 BUILDING D ELEVATIONS A5 BULDING E ELEVATIONS A6 BU LDING F ELEVATIONS I E1 PHOTOMETRIC SITE PLAN ONG -DRAINAGE PLAN CASE HISTORY: WZ-12-02 WZ-03-08 MS -02-07 Wz-10 08 MS -10-04 WZ-14-15 PBG -15-01 WA -16-02 r w 6EC EXHIBIT 33208- P vm 1 N=1,712,55 I E-3,106,53 MINIMUM OF 5 TREES ALONG THE FRONTAGE DECIDUOUS OR EVERGREEN 10' BLDG. SETBACK 10' UnUTY_ ESMT. EX. UTILITY POLE 50' �— R.O.W. 3 O 4.4' _ I STONE MONUMENT ; 15' SIGHT23.8' T2IANCLE — PARFET STREET MINI STORAGE PLANNED BUILDING GROUP AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO Q ------------------ ---------- ____-Q.________-______.—___---___----------- PROPOSED EMERGENCY 54' ACCESS EASEMENT �{ R15' EX FIRE HYDRANT (TYP.) 35' VALLEY WATER R15' 276 DISTRICT ESMT. SHALLOW 72Y D.59 (REC. NO. 78096490) STORAGE N=1,71$551.66 a�� s.. 5' BLDG. SETBACK ` UNITS E=3,106.810.60 1 I I— S 89'49'15' E (325.01') / � I GATE L CH) —3 �• CONST. 80 LF- 3' WIDE CONCRETE PAN (TYP.) BUILDING A 3,600 N_ ",712432'6 110.5' 5' UTILITY ESMT.� 16' 107.4' �•,�,(p�� z2' JG' —40'-t--22' 30 Q 7. 0°5, BUILDING B BUILDING C 3,200 SF 2,400 SF o 0 CONST. 80 LF- 3 CONST. 110 SY- WDE CONC. TE CONCRETE SIDEWALK PAN (TYP.) ,TALL 60LLAROS 8.5 10.5 _ 22' l —.�.r_ 22 —I—_ W. �� 10.5' 3' 3' INSTALL WHEEL _- CONST. GATE (RE ARCH) w' 5' UTILITY ESMT. SIGN 'COMMERCIAL VEHICLE ACCESS IS UNITED TO VEHICLES UNDER 17 FEET IN LENGTH' I I Io I I I I BUILDING 2,400 24' A DRI I I I N-1,712,431.8.9 I 125'. 6.5• 1E=3,106.810.77 Q 5' EX RIRE 1E D 1, DRIVE 2DUIOOS CON 14 CONST. 80 LF- WIDE CONCRETE LIFT R50' PAN �� 10.5' 3' 3' INSTALL WHEEL _- CONST. GATE (RE ARCH) w' 5' UTILITY ESMT. SIGN 'COMMERCIAL VEHICLE ACCESS IS UNITED TO VEHICLES UNDER 17 FEET IN LENGTH' I I Io I I I I BUILDING 2,400 24' A DRI I I I N-1,712,431.8.9 I 125'. 6.5• 1E=3,106.810.77 --lil u 1 I 1 o I 3 R'25' RO.5 I Q R15' 24' 1E o DRIVE PROPOSED SUOIN 14 GATE (RE: ARCH) PROPERTY LINE R50' m 0' CLEAR CREEK WATER h 2 CONTRACTOR MUST REPAIR ANY DAMAGE AREAS THAT ARE NOT A PART OF OF THE - CONST. 2,612 SY- ACCESS SANITARY SEWER ESMT. ASPHALT PAVFUFNT L,J WO' ' I, I 0z 11 I A ---- -_ _ 20' VALLEY WATER I I I I 25' VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ESMT I (REC. N0. 7809640964 90) DISTRICT ESMT. (REG NO. 83012940) 10' UTILITY O E I I I ESMT. I --lil u 1 I 1 o I 3 R'25' RO.5 I _____.._ DRAINAGE ESMT. (REC. NO. 011042920) g 20' � \ ATER ESMT.st FUTURE BUILDINGS(UPON� \ AN APPROVAL OF A SITE z I A PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION) I A 1 SITE PLAN C2 C2 Q R15' z 0 U CONSTRUCT A 6' HIGH SOLID o 1 FENCE ALONG THE SOUTH Z� PROPERTY LINE APPROVED PLANS m 0' CLEAR CREEK WATER h 2 CONTRACTOR MUST REPAIR ANY DAMAGE AREAS THAT ARE NOT A PART OF OF THE ACCESS SANITARY SEWER ESMT. L,J DRIVE 1 (REC. NO. 80045919) 0z PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT A ---- -_ _ 20' VALLEY WATER SECTIONS PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT DISTRICT ESMT. (REG NO. 83012940) C��YG�p�Q O 4. QUANTITIES PROVIDED ARE APPROAMATE, CONTRACTOR 70 VERIFY. o PROPOSED BUILDING GAP IN CLEAR (RECDNO. 201142920) 5' UTILITY ESMT. PROPOSED LANDSCAPING ( -- -- CREEK WATER 5' UTILITY ESMT. g N 89'45'15' E 203.33' REG. No. 2011042920 __..L_ DISTRSANITICT SMT I._ OISIRICT ESMT. � G z > G z 1 I 4I 5' UTILITY ESMT. z ®® Ei z 55 I REC. NO. 201104290) I ____ -_________ _____.._ DRAINAGE ESMT. (REC. NO. 011042920) g 20' � \ ATER ESMT.st FUTURE BUILDINGS(UPON� \ AN APPROVAL OF A SITE z I A PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION) I A 1 SITE PLAN C2 C2 N GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 20 40 M11IL 911�nr. (IN FEET) s.nn'w 1 INCH - 20 FT BEC 3200 -BP Pha Z 3 _ O 5 a S s a W z 0 U NOTA o 1. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY ALL EX CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND Z� APPROVED PLANS m 2 CONTRACTOR MUST REPAIR ANY DAMAGE AREAS THAT ARE NOT A PART OF OF THE �v L,J Lu o� 0z PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT Q < SECTIONS PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT O 4. QUANTITIES PROVIDED ARE APPROAMATE, CONTRACTOR 70 VERIFY. o PROPOSED BUILDING w 6. ALL RADIUS IS 2 FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PROPOSED LANDSCAPING a a [� PROPOSED LANDSCAPING � G z > G z Lwl_I d N PROPERTY BOUNDARY z ®® Ei z 55 - - RIGHT OF WAY UNE LOT UNE o ----- EASEMENT UNE a Q 4000 PSI CONCRETE (--3 PS CO EX EDGE OF ASPHALT - N' WITH SH �• EX CURB & GUTTER m o 3 0 2~ 3' WIDE CONCRETE PAN PROPOSED 2' CURB 3 GUTTER i z C2C2 N.T.S. EX WOOD FENCE a �— PROPOSED GATE N GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 20 40 M11IL 911�nr. (IN FEET) s.nn'w 1 INCH - 20 FT BEC 3200 -BP Pha Z 3 _ O 5 a S s a z 0 U NOTA o 1. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY ALL EX CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF EX. CONDITIONS DIFFER FROM WHAT IS SHOWN ON APPROVED PLANS 2 CONTRACTOR MUST REPAIR ANY DAMAGE AREAS THAT ARE NOT A PART OF OF THE APPROVED PLANS BACK TO IT'S ORIGINAL STATE L,J 3. ASPHALT @ CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTIONS TO BE REPLACED SHALL MATCH 00STING Q < SECTIONS a O 4. QUANTITIES PROVIDED ARE APPROAMATE, CONTRACTOR 70 VERIFY. 5. THE MOST CURRENT MUTCO STANDARDS SHALL APPLY FOR PARKING STRIPING. w 6. ALL RADIUS IS 2 FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. �j a [� a Lwl_I d N Eclf N Lil a Q 4000 PSI CONCRETE (--3 PS CO WITH SH �• ASPHALT PAVING .'lASPHALT PAVING o 3 0 2~ 3' WIDE CONCRETE PAN � C2C2 N.T.S. N GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 20 40 M11IL 911�nr. (IN FEET) s.nn'w 1 INCH - 20 FT BEC 3200 -BP Pha PARFET STREET MINI STORAGE PLANNED BUILDING GROUP AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ----- SECTION UNE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO PROPERTY BOUNDARY -.,. LOT UNE ----- TUN \ I I 1 4 MIN R T-_/ -_ -- \\ 5 2 IX OR CONTOUR ---5125-- IX MAJOR CONTOUR t--------------- -__ �__- �-�-= — — `- — — �- �G-moi- —5124— PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR I I II —5125— PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR PROPOSED EIERGBIeY ---- _ ACCESSEASEMEITT 1 \ / I I 35' VALLEY TOATER �----�------------- ------- I \ e � ---\ I / T DISTRICT E3ML \ \ 1 (�/ \1 (REG N0. 7 6490) S 89'49'15' E (325.011\_ - - - I- I_i I 1 SHADE TREE I I , I , / 10' UTIUTY I / ESMT. I I I / I 1 3 I in � I � I g I 1 STREET TREE PER 30 FEET ALONG RIGHT-OF-WAY (SEC. 26-502 (0) MF Ilii! �. ; 7 527,! g REMOVE E)LMj I a: 3.13775BSFF E L- — — — — /--------------/--------------___---------------------------��` --/-------_ ESMT. / A CWOODONSTRUCT A 6' HIGH SOLD / \\ SOUTHFENCE ALONG THE SOUT H PROPERTY UNE A7, ✓unUTY ESMT \ /REC. N0.,201142920)\ --- _- 5'DDLI TY T. -/ REC. NO. 2 2920) J - DRAINALEE§IL / -- / -(REC. NO. 2011042920)—x^ III --- I I I -\ , � 1►/ / � // / / __� X \ , / Z III /-------- \ I I ( \` �/ ,' / / , i ./ / ✓ / I I II 1 I SHRUBS y/ it ROCK MULCH 2' I'L," NATIVE SEED MIX 25. ixt WATER I I01�TRI T ESMT. r (RECI Nq 7809§490j\ \ i I 1 ASPHALT --I' 11 I 1 'k1jITYI/ 1 NOTE: 1. ALL ED AREA SHALL BE SERVED BY A ZONED, AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. �F \ �.-- IIS I T• ; \ I \ 2 INDIVIDUAL TREE AND SHRUB SPECIES YALL BE ESTABLISHED BY A LANDSCAPE PLAN AND APPROVED BY STAFF DURING THE BUILDING PERMIT RENEW PROCESS. I I I 3. NON-UVING MATERIAL SHALL BE LIMITED TO 35% NON-UVING LANDSCAPING / I � I I I I / /' \\ \\ ' WILL NOT EXCEED 35% OF THE TOTAL LANDSCAPED COVERAGE I `-I r I 1 % III ti r/ I I/ I \ I III II I I I I t I 1 LANDSCAPE TABLE PER Sec 26-5D2 LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED PROVIDED OPEN SPACE 7,971 SF 8.095 SF AXIMUM PERCENT LANDSCAPED COVERAGE 35% 19% STREET TREES. 5 5 ON-SITE TREES • 8 8 ON-SITE SHRUBS • 80 81 -TREES AND SHRUBS TO BE FROM THE SELECTED PLANT UTST NOTED BELOW PLANT LIST SITZ r HT. u TRUNKS r HT. 2.6' CAL 2SCAL IO HT. t5'CA 26• CAL REMARKS FULL CROWN, STAID 988 SPEC. OUAUTY FKAL CROWN, STAND DBD SPEC, OLOAM FM CROWN. STAKEC 969 SPEC DLWLITY FULL FROWN. STARED B68 SPEC. OUALItt FULL CROWN, STAND B65 SPEC. OUAITY FLAL FROWN. STAKED am SPEC aMLITY FULL FROWN. STARED US SPEC. OUMRY / I-- I / - - i' -T - BM BLUE MIST SPRFA 5 DAL. FKAL FORM PLAN I / / _------/ ---- CC SPRWGCAEENCOMPACTCRAJDERRY 5GAL SPAGNO PER PLAN VibWn'SOnm Grt C.1x FULL FOWA DO DWARF BWDBNO BUSNI 5CAL SPACING PER PLAN EWYP11w AlAea'Canpacfa FULLFORM OS GROWAOW FRAGRANT SUMAC SCAL SPACINGPER PLAN FIA i FORM Mw—LLAC 5°AL SPACRD PER PLAN ,,Q�'' SRMLP_v_ FULL FORM � -- \ ESMT. 1 '�' /// PD LL sKUL FUULFC eoc \ / AM 1+50.00 / V� `G•'`U, RD �� �� R Y 5 GA. FULAVNO PER L FORM � SP GOLDFLAME SRREA SGA SPACINGPERPLAN Sp RBAARa'OaMA.nd FULLFORM /----- \\ FUTURE BUIL}XNCS(UPON w BLUE ARROW"PER v FULL CROWM, STARED _M-APPROYAL OF A / AA�IP 7 we..aAA T1hw APW DAD SPEC ouAurY / \ PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION) / NOTE ALL PROPOSED TREES AND SHRUBS WILL BE INSTALLED PER THE MINIMUM REQUIRED PLANTING SIZES FOR THERE RESPECTIVE SPECIES SEC. 26-502 (F) N OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE CODE (DECIDUOUS/ORNAMENTAL TREES = (2)' CAUPER MEASURED (1) FOOT ABOVE THE GROUND. CONIFEROUS TREES WILL BE A MINIMUM OF (6) FEET AT TIME OF INSTALLATION. ALL GROUND COVERS WILL BE (5) GALLONS MINIMUM AT TIME OF INSTALLATION). GRAPHIC SCALE 1 LANDSCAPE PLAN 20 0 20 40 C3 C3 (IN FEET) 1 INCH = 20 FT RAID PM1ou C3 CD320 '"'"'• DUAN. SVM, COMMON+BOTANICAL NAME \ \\ 1 201ICUEAR CREEK WATER 3 \\ TREES \ \ I IT�RY/SEWER ESMT. \ AG AUTUMN GRLUANCE SERVKCEDERRY \ \ \REq. N4. 80045919) AiMm,SANagvRMMaAWnn BKWaRa �� A BP 9OSNLVIPME ,--y'F'y� WATER--_ ----_-- Rnn M•a.,dww l..aa.�,xs DIS CT ESMT. IH ISIi'ERLLL M]NEYLOCUST (NEC. N 83012940)— RP RED POI NTE AMPLE \ --r 1l AINA6EESM1'-_----Ja -_ GD OWKGO BAOBA f a -0T-GT.EAR� - EC. -NG -20114292 ----_ _ Ma05A I -'� f CREIX WATER - - - \ V ILn'� T s - __ . CP cNANTrAEER PEAR SM_ _ 5�I171 n..x,a..Fln. N- S_9 TH TDDA NAWTHOPN Oaloepe amQQVRvhis Tam' / --- _—__-- SHRUBS SITZ r HT. u TRUNKS r HT. 2.6' CAL 2SCAL IO HT. t5'CA 26• CAL REMARKS FULL CROWN, STAID 988 SPEC. OUAUTY FKAL CROWN, STAND DBD SPEC, OLOAM FM CROWN. STAKEC 969 SPEC DLWLITY FULL FROWN. STARED B68 SPEC. OUALItt FULL CROWN, STAND B65 SPEC. OUAITY FLAL FROWN. STAKED am SPEC aMLITY FULL FROWN. STARED US SPEC. OUMRY / I-- I / - - i' -T - BM BLUE MIST SPRFA 5 DAL. FKAL FORM PLAN I / / _------/ ---- CC SPRWGCAEENCOMPACTCRAJDERRY 5GAL SPAGNO PER PLAN VibWn'SOnm Grt C.1x FULL FOWA DO DWARF BWDBNO BUSNI 5CAL SPACING PER PLAN EWYP11w AlAea'Canpacfa FULLFORM OS GROWAOW FRAGRANT SUMAC SCAL SPACINGPER PLAN FIA i FORM Mw—LLAC 5°AL SPACRD PER PLAN ,,Q�'' SRMLP_v_ FULL FORM � -- \ ESMT. 1 '�' /// PD LL sKUL FUULFC eoc \ / AM 1+50.00 / V� `G•'`U, RD �� �� R Y 5 GA. FULAVNO PER L FORM � SP GOLDFLAME SRREA SGA SPACINGPERPLAN Sp RBAARa'OaMA.nd FULLFORM /----- \\ FUTURE BUIL}XNCS(UPON w BLUE ARROW"PER v FULL CROWM, STARED _M-APPROYAL OF A / AA�IP 7 we..aAA T1hw APW DAD SPEC ouAurY / \ PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION) / NOTE ALL PROPOSED TREES AND SHRUBS WILL BE INSTALLED PER THE MINIMUM REQUIRED PLANTING SIZES FOR THERE RESPECTIVE SPECIES SEC. 26-502 (F) N OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE CODE (DECIDUOUS/ORNAMENTAL TREES = (2)' CAUPER MEASURED (1) FOOT ABOVE THE GROUND. CONIFEROUS TREES WILL BE A MINIMUM OF (6) FEET AT TIME OF INSTALLATION. ALL GROUND COVERS WILL BE (5) GALLONS MINIMUM AT TIME OF INSTALLATION). GRAPHIC SCALE 1 LANDSCAPE PLAN 20 0 20 40 C3 C3 (IN FEET) 1 INCH = 20 FT RAID PM1ou C3 CD320 Meredith Reckert From: Steve Nguyen Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 10:59 AM To: Meredith Reckert; Mark Westberg Cc: Dave Brossman Subject: RE: PC report Just a friendly input. The turning paths indicate that there are no room for error at some corners and therefore I would suggest to widen all 22 -ft aisle to 24 ft. Steve Nguyen, P.E. Engineering Manager Office Phone: 303-235-2862 City of PPUBLIC WheatWdge W1jORKS From: Meredith Reckert Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 8:36 AM To: Mark Westberg Cc: Steve Nguyen; Dave Brossman Subject: FW: PC report Can you traffic experts take a look at this before tonight? Meredith Reckert, AICP Senior Planner Office Phone: 303-235-2848 FAX: 303-235-2857 City of / Wheat P,`d e ct�AfmuNnY DMIDPWN'! From: Noah Nemmers [mailto:noah�i)baselinecorp.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 2:38 PM To: Meredith Reckert Cc: Alan McKinster (amckinster(a)kenray. biz); Greg & Angel Herbers; Dave Brossman; Mark Westberg; Kenneth Johnstone Subject: RE: PC report Hi Meredith, Thanks again for everyone's time this morning to move us closer to gaining staff support on the project. We are looking forward to the PC hearing tomorrow and will gather the commissions feedback and request a continuance to allow us the time needed to refine the plans where necessary in order to gain staff support in advance of a May 19th hearing for a final decision. • In regard to the Architecture we hope to demonstrate our substantial compliance with the Criteria and continue to work with your staff on the final elevations. 1 • Landscape will be amended if necessary to specify particular plant material placement. • Drive Isle widths were widened from 20 feet to 22 feet to comply with the Minimum standards on the private drive isles and the fire access meets Arvada Fire requirements. I've also included the analysis we performed for a 30' moving truck which is in excess of the largest truck most consumers can rent. • Trash we feel is a minor issue but it's certainly preferable to not have a dumpster and enclosure on-site that would encourage tenants to use the facility for their personal disposal and dump site. Office waste will be in a traditional curb side pickup container. • In contrast to the perceived tone of the Staff Report you confirmed that the City has no objection to the use proposed and we all agreed that the use poses no significant impact to City services and is a benefit to local businesses that can store files off-site. • We trust that the 20' dedication is no longer an issue with the development of Lot 1 and we will show the "Future 20' ROW" on all revised plans along with the note Dave will provide in regard to the curb, gutter, and sidewalk requirements that will be conditioned on the development of Lot 2. Please let me know if I have not represented our conversations accurately and thanks again for your efforts! Regards, NOAH NEMMERS, P.E. I Civil Engineering Manager, Golden I Baseline Engineering, Planning, & Surveying 11950 Ford Street I Golden, CO 80401 1 Phone: 303.940.9966 x 207 1 Cell: 303.482.77121 Fax: 303.940.9959 1 www.baselinecorp.com From: Meredith Reckert [maiIto: mreckertCabci.wheatridge.co. us] Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 9:03 AM To: Greg & Angel Herbers Cc: Noah Nemmers; Alan McKinster (amckinster�i)ken ray. biz) Subject: RE: PC report The extension of West 50th Avenue from Kipling to Ward has been controversial for the last 30 years. Certain City Councils have supported it but during the 2000's it was not supported. I do not have specific reference to a particular meeting or staff report but just that in general, at that time, the thought was not to extend it. That philosophy has changed which is why we're asking for a dedication now. Meredith Reckert, AICP Senior Planner Office Phone: 303-235-2848 FAX: 303-235-2857 , City of Rorm t midge �.C),�1MUN191�' {aiYk1lJCMl{V7 From: Greg & Angel Herbers [mailto:gaherbers(abq.com] Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 11:27 AM To: Meredith Reckert Cc: Noah Nemmers; Alan McKinster (amckinster(cb ken ray. biz) Subject: Re: PC report K Meredith, Were you able to find the date of the City Council meeting where the policy was established that 50th Avenue would not be extended? I believe you spoke with my wife about our need for this at your offices last week. You refer to it in your January 20th, 2011 Planning Commission Staff Report, pg. 5, WZ-1 0-08/MS-1 0-04?Hoss. Greg Herbers Parfet Storage, LLC From: "Meredith Reckert"<mreckert(a)-ci.wheatridge.co.us> To: "Noah Nemmers" <noah baselinecorp.com>, "Greg & Angel Herbers" <gaherbers(cDg.com>, "Alan McKinster (amckinsterakenray.biz)" <amckinster(c)-ken ray. biz> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 4:30:15 PM Subject: PC report Meredith Reckert, AICP Senior Planner 7500 W. 29`h Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Office Phone: 303-235-2848 FAX: 303-235-2857 www.ci.wheatridge.co.us CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail contains business -confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, electronic storage or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, attaching the original message, and delete the original message from your computer, and any network to which your computer is connected. Thank you. After WEST 50TH AVENUE — The issue of extension of W. 50th Avenue has been debated since the original parcel on the west side of Parfet was platted. W. 50th Avenue currently extends from Miller to Oak Street, east of the subject parcel and from Robb Street east where it dead -ends into a cul-de-sac on 11201 W. I- 70 Frontage Road North (western Autoplex parcel). 1986: In the mid -1980's, an amendment was made to the Major Streets Plan of the Comprehensive Plan. This amendment designated an arterial street corridor between Kipling Street and Ward Road. Since 501h was a logical extension, 40' of right -of way was dedicated for 501h Avenue as part of the two -lot subdivision approval on the parcel on the west side of Parfet in 1986. 1994: During the 1994 Planned Building Group approval for an interim used car sales operation on 11201 W. I-70 Frontage Road North, the applicant indicated that he felt it was premature to develop 50th Avenue at the time, but would be willing to participate when the time was appropriate. A condition of City Council approval was that W. 50th be constructed on both sections of the Medved property when a building permit for the western parcel is issued. 1998: As part of the PBG review for a permanent dealership on 11201 W. I-70 Frontage Road, street construction plans for 50th Avenue were reviewed and it was indicated that these improvements should be completed on both lots connecting to Parfet prior to issuance of a C.O. The street extension was needed as the plan relied on 50th Avenue for the unloading of vehicles on the north end. The plan was approved by City Council on July 13 but was reconsidered at the next meeting (July 27). The reconsideration allowed construction of a cul-de-sac off 50th on the north side of the property (in lieu of full street extension) with the vacation of the southern 10' of that right-of-way. Further, that the designation for 501h be changed from an arterial to a collector and that 50th Avenue would only be completed if and when the residential properties to the east on Parfet are developed for industrial or commercial uses. 2000: The new Comprehensive Plan is adopted. The connection of 50th Avenue between Parfet and Oak Street is deleted on the Roadway Classification Map. 2003: During the final development plan and plat hearings for Case No. WZ-03-08 (Hoss PID), Public Works requested a 25' wide dedication for 50th Avenue extending west from Oak Street. The purpose was to reserve one-half of the right-of-way width in the event 50th is extended from Oak Street to Parfet. This condition was not included in the motion for approval and no right-of-way dedication occurred. 2005: During the public hearings for the zone change on the subject property, Staff made recommendations to both Planning Commission and City Council that right-of-way for W. 50" Avenue be dedicated between Oak and Parfet Streets. At the May 19, 2005 Planning Commission public hearing the following condition was included in the motion of approval: "Applicant shall be required to provide 30 feet of right-of-way or easement for West 501h Avenue extension on the north property line and/or drainage purposes. This issue shall be resolved prior to or concurrent with the final development plan and final plat." At the July 25, 2005 City Council public hearing, this condition was not included in the zone change motion for approval. In response to adoption of the Neighborhood Revitalization Study, Winston Associates was retained to work with staff in the creation of three subarea plans. One of the subareas being considered is the northwest area in the city with boundaries generally from W. 52°a Avenue to the north I-70 Frontage Road and Ward Road to Tabor Street. Transit Oriented Design (TOD) is being explored due to RTD's planned light rail transit stop for the Goldline in the vicinity of Ward Road and W. 501h Place. The intent of TOD is to encourage pedestrian activity through the use of street grids which in turn impacts the type, form and quality of commercial development. At the most recent subarea plan meeting held on January 24, maps were shown with the extension of 501h Avenue from Ward east to Tabor and beyond. Not only is the extension of 501h Avenue essential to provide a secondary access route through this industrial area but also to provide the east/west grid connections for TOD. Although the proposed subarea plan circulation plans are not adopted, Staff will recommend that they include the 50th Avenue through connection. Besides the north I-70 Frontage Road, there are no other east/west road connections between Kipling and Ward Road. 501h Avenue between Kipling and Miller was recently constructed as part of the Arvada Ridge commercial development. 501h Avenue between Miller and Oak Streets is already completed, as is portion east from Robb Street to the northwest corner of the eastern Medved lot with unbuilt right-of-way extending from the temporary cul-de-sac east to Parfet. Acquisition of this section of 501h between Parfet and Oak Streets would ensure the future completion of the east/west connection between Kipling and Ward Road. 2009 When Envision Wheat Ridge was adopted in 2009, 50th Avenue was show on the Transportation Structure Map; although politically this was not supported by a member on CC (term from 2001- 2009) and the then Mayor (2005 — 2013). 2011— Case Nos. WZ-10-08 and MS -10-04 During the above -referenced zone change staff did not pursue dedication for W. 50th Avenue because we knew it wouldn't be supported politically. 2014 New mayor and City Council elected who would be more supportive for the extension of 50th A 41 City of Wh6atP,iicd1-ge POSTING CERTIFICATION CASE NO. PBG -15-01 PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING DATE: (name) Apri121, 2016 residing at / "9�,5" 4eo.4-A:;P Go co��✓ (2-1:1 ?a fo (add ess) as the applicant for Case No. PBG -15-01 hereby certify that I have posted the Notice of Public Hearing at 0 ��aFET s-7— Gj ya5m �i/,G-Lr Go a o 3 3 AL (Iocation) on this 5- day of and do hereby certify that said sign has been posted and remained in place for fifteen (15) days prior to and including the scheduled day of public hearing of this case. The sign was posted in the position shown ot1 the map below. Signature: NOTE: This form must be submitted at the public earing on this case and will be placed in the applicant's case file at the Community Development Department. MAP .=507 H PAV E - '1� City of Wheat Qidge PUBLIC POSTING REQUIREMENTS One sign must be posted per street frontage. In addition, the following requirements must be met: ■ The sign must be located within the property boundaries. ■ The sign must be securely mounted on a flat surface. ■ The sign must be elevated a minimum of thirty (30) inches from ground. ■ The sign must be visible from the street without obstruction. ■ The sign must be legible and posted for fifteen (15) continuous days prior to and including the day of the hearing [sign must be in place until 5pm on April 21, 2016. It is the applicant's responsibility to certify that these requirements have been met and to submit a completed Posting Certification Form to the Community Development Department. f r City of -KOKWheatP d- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 291h Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 LETTER NOTICE (As required pursuant to Code Section 26-109.D) April 6, 2016 Dear Property Owner / Current Resident: This is to inform you of Case No. PBG15-01, an application filed by Parfet Storage for approval of a planned building group to allow six proposed storage buildings and the existing office/home to be used as an office/home for the site manager for the property located at 5130 Parfet Street. This request is scheduled for public hearing in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue. The schedule is as follows: Planning Commission April 21, 2016 (iD 7:00 p.m., As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at 303-235-2846. Thank you, City of Wheat Ridge Planning Division Individuals with disabilities are encouraged to participate in all public meetings sponsored by the City of Wheat Ridge. If you need inclusion assistance, please call Maureen Harper, Public Information Officer, at 303-235-2877 at least one week in advance of the meeting. www.ci.wheatridge.co.0 s Vicinity Map Site _ jL LU H iT .r'� •� e M h_ * "°- *�7Li �. 50i H ,AV rvf -I t t.t,.w `t rC swlw fii t1�: tc. 77�„�• arm k +4 M4+ • Un5 ` 11 PBG-15-Ol.doc ARS SAND & GRAVEL CO LLC BEAR LAND HOLDINGS LLC CIP OWNER LLC 8505 W MOUNTAIN VIEW LN 11001 W I-70 FRONTAGE RD North 1512 LARIMER ST 325 LITTLETON CO 80125 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 DENVER CO 80202 ENKLLC 12315 W 54TH DR ARVADA CO 80002 GORDON RONALD J GORDON CONSTANCE A 6800 GARRISON ST ARVADA CO 80004 PARFET STORAGE LLC 14995 FOOTHILL RD GOLDEN CO 80401 TIN INC % INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY PO BOX 2118 MAMPHIS TN 38101 EATHERTON GORDON W EATHERTON DEBRA M HERBERS GREGORY A 3411 S IRVING ST ENGLEWOOD CO 80110 KARR JAMES A KARR SHERYL M 60 S GARLAND ST LAKEWOOD CO 80226 PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO % PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 840 DENVER CO 80201 WEHLING FRANK W 5006 PARFET ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 FREMAR INDUSTRIAL PARK % GRACE MANAGEMENT 2200 E 104TH AVE SUITE 105 THORNTON CO 80233 LO SASSO CLYDE G LO SASSO SHIRLEY J 5120 PARFET ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 STIESMEYER CHARLES 4996 PARFET ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 Pickup truck Cargo van Uffizi u«s4`f. 10' Mini Mover ,tr *W4 17' Easy Loading Mover U4LW L - . i9 26' Super Mover F- E - TRUCK TURNING ANALYSIS - ---- ----- WAS'"E: L I N E Engineering - Planning - Surveying 1950 FORD STREET - GOLDEN, COLORADO 80401 P.- 303,940.9966 - F 3039409959 - www.baselinecorp.com m GRAPHIC SCALE 30 0 30 60 qpo (IN FEET) 1 INCH = 30 FT 22 - ----- I II II LOT 2 Pickup truck CYAWIL A Mk Cargo van e 10' Mini glover t ? .Uj6t AU R 17' Easy Loading Mover �WIJWL iJMAlil, 'r iY 26' Super Mover TRUCK TURNING ANALYSIS BASELINE Engineering • Planning • Surveying 1950 FORD STREET • GOLDEN, COLORADO 80401 P. 303940.9966 • F 303940.9959 • wwwbaselinecorP.com GRAPHIC SCALE 30 0 30 60 (IN FEET) 1 INCH = 30 FT LOT 2 Meredith Reckert From: Meredith Reckert Sent: Monday, March 28, 2016 10:13 AM To: 'Noah Nemmers' Subject: PC Hi, Noah I wanted to confirm that we have set a public hearing date for the Parfet Storage project in front of Planning Commission for April 21, 2016 at 7 PM. A posting sign that we will provide must be posted no later than April 7. Staff comments will be prepared for distribution on April 14. Staff still has major concerns about the plan set package with primary concerns regarding the architecture and drive aisle widths. I would highly recommend your client retain the services of an architect as a positive recommendation for the hearing is doubtful with the plan set right now. Let me know if you have questions. Also, please be advised that I will be out of the office April 1 through April 6. Meredith Meredith Reckert, AICP Senior Planner 7500 W. 29`h Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Office Phone: 303-235-2848 FAX: 303-235-2857 www.ci.wheatridge.co.us City of Aie -- CorwHtur+� irY ~� CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail contains business -confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, electronic storage or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, attaching the original message, and delete the original message from your computer, and any network to which your computer is connected. Thank you. Q - EASEMENT AGREEMENT 3 THIS EASEMENT AGREEMENT is for the conveyance of a driveway, curb/gutter and privacy fence easement, these improvements are to be installed or are already existing along the property and fence line known as: "THE SOUTHERN PROPERY LINE OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, PARFET PARK SUBDIVISON, TRACT 2 REPLAT#2, RECEPTION #2011042920 LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTON 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORADO." Clyde G. Lo Sasso and Shirley J. Lo Sasso, (the Grantors) are the owners of the property located at 5120 Parfet Street, Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 (the Property). The Grantors do hereby grant a perpetual, exclusive easement to Parfet. Storage, LLC (the Grantee) for a driveway, curb/gutter and privacy fence. As a condition for the easement to be granted, Parfet Storage, LLC located at 5130 Parfet Street, Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 leaving a legal description of Lots 1 and 2, Parfet Park Subdivision, Tract 2 Replat #2, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, must pay for the construction and maintenance costs of the improvements that are to be constructed or that are existing along the property and fence line of the Grantors which is 5120 Parfet Street, Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033. The to be erected privacy fence shall be constructed as close as practical along the side of the already existing driveway, curb/gutter. It is agreed that as part of this Easement Agreement, that Parfet Storage, LLC, its successors, transferees and assigns shall also have access to the portion of the property described herein for maintenance and related purposes. The easement conveyed above shall be perpetual and shall be binding upon and shall enure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their successors, transferees and assigns. Grantors shall have, during the continuance of this Easement, the right to dispose of the Property and to use the Property for other purposes provided such use does not materially interfere with the easement granted herein. In the event Grantors shall, in the future, wish to grant additional easements or rights-of-way which encroach upon the easement granted herein, Grantee expressly agrees and covenants it will consent to share the Property, provided the proposed additional easements or rights-of-way do not materially interfere with the purposes for which this easement is granted. Grantee may not use this grant of easement for any purpose other than that which is specifically described herein. If the Property is used by Grantee for any purpose other than stated herein, the easement is automatically terminated, and all of the right, title and interest of Grantee (and Grantee's successors or assigns) in and to the Property become null and void, and the Property shall absolutely revert to and revest in Grantors as fully and completely as if this instrument had not been executed, without the necessity for suit or re-entry and Grantee shall remove improvements as provided above. No act or omission on the part of any beneficiary of this paragraph shall be a waiver of the operation or enforcement of the paragraph. Grantee agrees to comply with all rules, regulations and policies authoritatively promulgated pertaining to the use of the Property. Grantors and Grantee agree that this Easement Agreement including all exhibits, supersedes any and all prior written or oral agreements, and there are no covenants or agreements between the parties except as set forth herein with respect to the use of the Property by Grantee. No prior or contemporaneous addition, deletion, or other amendment hereto shall have any force or effect whatsoever unless embodied herein in writing. No subsequent amendment hereto shall have any force or effect unless embodied in a written agreement executed and approved by the officials and officers of the State of Colorado as required by the Colorado Revised Statutes, as amended, or such assistants as they may designate. Parfet Storage, LLC shall be responsible for recording this Easement Agreement with the Clerk and Recorder's Office in the county or counties in which the Property is located. Parfet Storage, LLC shall provide the Grantors with a confirmed copy of the recorded easement. Any notice required or permitted by this Easement Agreement may be delivered in person or sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, to the party at the address as hereinafter provided, and if sent by mail it shall be effective when posted in the U.S. Mail Depository with sufficient postage attached thereto: Grantors: Clyde G. Lo Sasso Shirley J. Lo Sasso 5120 Parfet Street Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Grantee: Parfet Storage, LLC 5130 Parfet Street Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Notice of change of address shall be treated as any other notice. If any part of this Easement Agreement is found, decreed or held to be void or unenforceable, the remainder of the provisions of this Easement Agreement shall not be affected thereby and shall remain in full force and effect. This Easement Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Colorado. Each parry who is a signatory to this Easement Agreement has been authorized by its partnership or company, as the case may be, to enter into this Easement Agreement. On request, the applicable entity will provide written documentation that it is authorized to enter into the Easement Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Easement Agreement is hereby executed by the Grantors on this / day ofyjGi/LC , 2016. By: & Z4 1 —Y4 Z By: Clyde G. Lo Sasso Shixely J. Lo Sasso Parfet Storage, LLC, as Grantee, does hereby agree to be bo -Lu -id by the provisions set forth in this Easement. PARFET STORAGE, LLC By: l� C Date AlanL6. McKinster Member — Mgr. March 3, 2016 Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner City of Wheat Ridge Public Works & Community Development 7500 W. 29th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 mreckert@ci.wheatridge.co.us RE: Case #PBG-15-01/Parfet Resubmittal and Response Comments 1"ASELINE Engineering Planning • Surveying Ms. Reckert, We have addressed comments received from you on January 29, 2016 and February 4, 2016. This letter records your comments and our responses to them in blue. We trust that these revisions are adequate to allow the PBG to proceed to hearing. Please refer to the revised plans accompanying this letter for the changes listed here: Comments from Community Development: SHEET ONE 1. In the title indicate that this property is in the "southwest quarter of Section 16" Response: Changed as stated. 2. The top margin needs to be 1" per the Jefferson County Clerk and Recorder's requirements. Response: Changed the Title Sheets to incorporate the 1" Top Margin. 3. Insert the owners' name (Parfet Storage LLC) in the Declaration of Planning Building Group. Response: Changed as stated. 4. In the Declaration of Planning Building Group designate who will be signing as the owner. Response: Changed as stated. 5. In the Surveyor's Certificate, designate who will be signing. Response: Changed as stated. 6. Under Notes, correct the fencing citation to Section 26-603. Response: Changed as stated. 7. In the Project Description, correct the spelling of "consist". Response: Changed as stated. 8. In the Case History box, add Case No. W A-16-02. Response: Changed as stated. SHEET TWO 1. How will the northern portion of the western building be accessed? If access to this area occurs from the north, an access easement will be required from those property owners. Response: Access gate at this location is only for emergency pedestrian access from the north. Noted on plans. In the legend, the pattern for "existing building to be removed", appears to designate all proposed buildings in the graphic. Please modify this category so it is clear that these buildings are being proposed. Response: Changed as stated. There are several areas which do not have a designation in the legend - presume that this will be landscaping. Add a category to the legend indicating so. Response: Changed as stated. SHEET THREE 1. In note 3. indicate that non -living landscaping shall not exceed 35% of the total landscaped coverage. Response: Changed the note as stated. 2. In the table, add percentage of total site for required and proposed landscaped coverage. Corporate Headquarters High Plains Rocky Mountains Downtown Golden Downtown Greeley Ski Village 1950 Ford Street 710 11th Avenue, Suite 105 419 Oak Street, PO Box 770152 Golden, Colorado 80401 Greeley, Colorado 80631 Steamboat Springs, Colorado 80477 Ph 303.940.9966 Ph 970.353.7600 Ph 970.879.1825 Fax 303.940.9959 Fax 970.353.7601 Fax 866.242.9106 Pagel 2 Wheat Ridge_ResponseComments Response: Changed as stated. MAJOR ITEMS OF CONCERN: ACCESS DRIVE AISLE WIDTHS The site plan design does not meet the City standards for interior drive aisle width. At a minimum, the interior drive must be 22' wide. It is advisable that the aisles may need to be wider to accommodate large trucks and pull - behind trailers. The 20' wide aisles that you have proposed within the development require a 2' variance. Previously, you had indicated that 20' is an "industry standard"; however, our research on the subject, indicates the typical industry standard for interior aisles is 25 '. The two existing Public Storage facilities in the City both have 25 'wide aisles. Other municipal standards in the metropolitan area appear to be around 30'. The Planning Commission will review the variance as part of the overall Planned Building Group review. This variance will not be supported by staff Response: All drive aisles have been changed to 22 feet wide. BUILDING ARCHITECTURE The building architecture included on sheets 4 - 9 does not comply with the Heavy Commercial/Industrial design standards specified in the Architectural and Site Design Manual (ASDM). These substandard items include facade detail, facade articulation, materials, and transparency. Even though the facades on building A have been embellished, the standards specified in the ASDM are not being met. Primary materials, which must comprise 40% of the facade, must be one of the following materials: brick, stone, textured, colored concrete block or terra-cotta. Secondary materials, which may not exceed 60% of the facade, are to be smooth -faced CMU, EIFS, metal panels or articulated concrete panels. Staff also requested that the southern facades of buildings B, C and 0 have treatment as well. This request was ignored. Although elevations of the existing house/office are not being required, please provide a narrative as to existing materials and what modifications to the exterior would be allowed, if any. Attached are referrals received from other city departments and outside agencies regarding the planned building group. Response: The building architecture has been revised as requested. Comments from Public Works: PLANNING & ZONING: Site Development Plan: 1. As stated in the previous comments, the existing curb & gutter and proposed fence as shown on the Landscape Plan lie outside of the subject property boundary. In light of this, a copy of an Easement or Agreement from the affected adjacent property owner(s) will need to be provided to the City. Response: Noted. A copy of the easement agreement is included with this resubmittal. 2. Please refer to the comments from the Drainage Plan for the westerly swale for the Landscape Plan. The Civil Construction Plans and Drainage Plan are going to include riprap, sod, concrete energy dissipater(s), and other items within this Swale; PW recommends coordinating with the civil engineer to identify the types and locations of these items on this Plan as they are going to affect the placement of plantings. Response: Plans updated to include necessary swale details. CIVIL ENGINEERING: Final Drainage Report (Discussion): 1. Public Works still has concerns regarding the design of the westerly swale. Please include the following in the Pagel 3 Wheat Ridge_ResponseComments Report: General Response Comment: There seems to be continued concern regarding the conveyance from the Lot 1 development down to the detention pond. We believe that it's important to put the magnitude of this runoff in perspective. The 100 -yr flow from this area is less than 8 CFS which will result in a total depth of approximately 6 inches within the ditch improvements proposed and an additional foot of freeboard has been provided. In addition to adding and inlet and a short segment of pipe, we are armoring the steeper drops and also calling for erosion control blanket to provide protection along the improved ditch slopes to stabilize the slopes and to ensure seed will grow and flourish. For the drainage area that tributary this will hydraulically function much like a roadside ditch. The owner accepts responsibility for ensuring that it is properly constructed and maintained. a. Section E under the Proposed (Developed) Drainage System states that "the max velocity for the channel has been designed to keep flows under 5.0 ft/sec." Given the fact that the Construction Plan Sheet C6 shows six grade changes in the profile and only one Channel Report was included in this Report, please discuss what the true ft. per second velocity is going to be for each grade change, referring to the respective Channel Report along the entire length of the swale. In other words, run the Channel Report calcs for each grade change and discuss those results in the narrative. Response: Velocity has been discussed in the report and channel reports have been included in the appendix. b. The grades change dramatically from one area of the swale to another. Please note that the armoring currently proposed is inadequate and must be extended beyond the BOTTOM of the steep (25%) grades to prevent erosion. The length of the rip -rap along bottom of all steep grades as erosion protection needs to be calculated in a similar manner as if it were a culvert apron to ensure the length of the rip -rap is adequate. (Refer to the January 2016 UDFCD Volume 2, Energy Dissipation and Erosion Protection section, page 9-67). Response: Rip rap will be grouted and an apron length has been calculated. c. Native seeding has been used on the majority of Lot 2 of this property and has been demonstrated to be grossly inadequate. FYI: There is a large area on the easterly side of the existing slope of Lot 2 that is currently eroding away (carving substantial channels) and is triggering enforcement action by the City. The "native seeding" has not shown to be effective (and this is sheet flow) for this steep of a slope. Given the current proposal has nearly identical grades; PW is going to take a far more cautious approach to the design for the westerly swale, especially if the design does not appear to provide adequate stabilization. If a V-shaped channel is to be employed, then channel stabilization must be utilized for the design to be approvable. Native seeding alone will NOT qualify as stabilization for this swale. Response: Swale will be constructed using an erosion control blanket. d. Discuss that all rip -rap proposed on steep slopes such as 4:1(25% slope) shall be grouted. For any areas where grouting is not proposed, describe in detail what measures will be employed to prevent the sediment on the swale bottom from eroding downstream. Please note that irrigated sod may be required and possibly the use of permanent structures such as baffles could even be required to minimize velocities. Response: Rip -rap rundowns are now called out as grouted. 2. While we fully understand the costs associated with it, PW still recommends that a pipe be utilized to convey the stormwater to the detention facility due to numerous challenges associated with an open channel design. Response: A pipe has been added for the first 100 feet of the original swale location. Final Drainage Report (Appendix): 1. Pertaining to the westerly swale: a. Need to provide calculations to support the current lengths of the proposed rip -rap along bottom of all steep grades (refer to Discussion comment 1b above). Response: Calculation included in appendix. b. Provide a separate Channel Report for each change in grade along the length of the swale. Be sure to use the proper Manning's N -Value for each of the following: Pagel 4 Wheat Ridge_ResponseComments i. The rip -rap areas, ii. The areas to be sodded, and iii. If native seeding is proposed for any slopes, you must use a bare earth N -Value. Response: Channel reports have been included in the appendix. Developed Drainage Plan: 1. "W. 23rd Ave." needs to be changed to "Parfet Street". Response: Changed as stated. 2. The Proposed Drainage Plan must be modified to match the Civil Construction Plan set (especially for the swale along the westerly boundary line of Lot 2). Response. Changed as stated. 3. The text got cut off for the WS and Volume table (taken from the UDFCD spreadsheet). Response: Volume table format has been updated. 4. In addition to channel stabilization for the rest of the westerly swale, substantial armoring shall be required at the two proposed bends in the swale to prevent failure due to erosion. Response: Changed os stated 5. Need to provide an armored rundown into the detention facility. Response: Changed as stated. 6. Show the outlet structure as remaining but that the orifice plate will need to be modified (for the EURV rather than being multi -stage). Response: Original plans meet comment suggestion by referring to a detail on a different page. 7. Show the positioning and limits of the emergency overflow weir. Response: Changed as stated. Civil Construction Plans: 1. Please add this to the General Notes (Sheet C2): "20. NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR: IF MORE THAN THREE (3) STREET CUTS OCCUR WITHIN 250 LINEAR FEET, ADDITIONAL MILLING/OVERLAY REQUIREMENTS WILL APPLY. REFER TO THE TERMS OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE ROW CONSTRUCTION PERMIT (THAT MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, 303.235.2861, PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK)." Response: Changed as stated. 2. On Sheet C4, Site Plan: a. Please shorten the curbing on the west side of the swale by one more foot to the west, and extend a short concrete V -pan at the top of the rundown to help direct flow and minimize by-pass. Response: Inlet has been added instead of original curb cut and the curb runs directly into the new inlet behind the curb. b. Delete the rip -rap hatching from extending into the curb & gutter at the top of the rundown. Response: Rip -rap has been removed due to addition of inlet. 3. On all sheets with a plan view: a. Regarding the westerly swale, in order to approve an open channel design, this swale is going to need substantial channel stabilization and armoring. There are very steep slopes and a couple of 90° bends that must be well armored to prevent failure. Response: Swale will be constructed with erosion control blanket and armoring has been added to steep sections and bends. b. Rip -rap will need to be extended beyond the bottom of the very steep slopes (refer to the Final Drainage Report comments above), the lengths of which need to be demonstrated through hard calculations of the Channel Reports for each segment of the swale. Response. Calculations have been added to the appendix. 4. On Sheet C6, Grading Plan - Lot 1: a. Need to provide an armored rundown from the westerly swale into the detention facility. Response: Changed as stated. b. Show the positioning and limits of the emergency overflow weir. Response: Changed as stated. Pagel 5 Wheat Ridge_ResponseComments ITEMS OF NOTE: 1. CDPS Permit & Stormwater Management Plan: This site in general is greater than one acre in size and the area of disturbance will meet or exceed one (1) acre, so a Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) associated with the required State CDPS Permit shall be submitted to the City of Wheat Ridge for review and approval. The SWMP must be approved by the City prior to issuance of any Demolition, Grading, or Building Permits. The CDPS Permit is generally obtained from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment by the contractor at time of Building Permit Application. A copy of the CDPS must accompany the final submittal of the SWMP. Please contact Bill LaRow, Stormwater Program Manager at 303.235.2871 for further information). It is highly recommended that the SWMP be submitted as soon as possible to avoid delays in the issuance of required Permits. Response: Noted. 2. Drainage Certification/ Stormwater Maintenance Agreement and 0 & M Plan: Please note the following items required prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the Subdivision: a. Drainage Certification: A Drainage Certification Letter from the Engineer -of -Record stating that all drainage related items were constructed per the approved civil engineering documents. The Certification Letter shall be accompanied by As -Built plans in support of the statements made in the Letter as required by the Municipal Code of Laws. Response: Noted. b. Stormwater Maintenance Agreement and 0 & M Plan: All post -construction Best Management Practices (BMP's) for water quality must be maintained and inspected by the property owner(s) per Section 20-34 of the City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Code of Laws. For stormwater quality facilities including, but not limited to, above -ground or underground detention facilities, porous landscape detention areas, porous pavement, centrifuge type devices such as a Rinker Stormcepter®, hydrodynamic separation systems such as a Contech Vortechs®, or for any other approved post -construction BMP, a Stormwater Maintenance Agreement accompanied by an Operations and Maintenance (0 & M) Schedule/Log shall be required prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. The 0 & M Schedule/Log must be kept current and will be inspected on a regular basis by City staff to ensure compliance with City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Code requirements. Response: Noted. 3. Fees in Lieu of Construction: Since no Public Improvements currently exist along Parfet Street on either side of the subject property, fees in the amount of $7,983.38 will be taken in lieu of construction of the required Public Improvements along the 152.5' Parfet Street frontage. The fees will be due prior to issuance of any Building Permit. Response: Noted 4. Right -of -Way Dedication: A 20' strip of Right -of -Way along the southerly portion of Lot 2 will be required with development of Lot 2. This is to allow for future construction of W. 50th Avenue to the west of Oak Street, and will provide better access to Lot 2. Response: Noted. For your approval please find 2 sets of plans and reports with all revisions noted above and additional information as requested. We look forward to your approval and appreciate your review of this application. Respectfully, Noah J. Nemmers Baseline Engineering Manager Meredith Reckert From: Meredith Reckert Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 9:12 AM To: 'Noah Nemmers' Subject: RE: Case# PBG-15-01/Parfet Storage Hi, Noah That can always be a discussion item at the Planning Commission hearing if that's how you'd like to proceed. We definitely allow you to use glazing which gives the appearance of windows but provides no transparency. The following is a the language from the Architectural and Site Design Manual regarding transparency in our Heavy Commercial/Light Industrial areas. Have your clients retained an architect? I would highly advise professional design input on the proposed architecture shown on the PBG. C. Transparency The following requirements shall apply only to building facades that meet one of the following conditions: 1. The facade faces a public street and is within 0 to 50 feet of that public street. 2. The facade is visible to adjacent residential properties. All other facades are encouraged to follow as many of the below standards and guidelines as possible. Design Principle: Facades at the ground level should incorporate windows to create visual interest. Design Standards: 1. Each facade shall be at least 15 percent transparent. 2. Transparency calculation: transparency shall be calculated as the percentage of clear, non -reflective glass within the ground floor facade. — Transparent doors and window mullions shall count as transparent area. — Structural elements and opaque or reflective glass shall not be counted as transparent area. Meredith Meredith Reckert, AICP Senior Planner Office Phone: 303-235-2848 FAX: 303-235-2857 City of -- ?�► Cox,Mu�i�rr Urw�a.orrac��- From: Noah Nemmers [mailto:noah@baselinecorp.com] Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 12:08 PM To: Meredith Reckert Subject: RE: Case# PBG-15-01/Parfet Storage Hi Meredith, I wanted to follow up on this email to see if you could provide some direction on the building elevations. Regards, NOAH NEMMERS, P.E. I Civil Engineering Manager, Golden Baseline Engineering, Planning, & Surveying 11950 Ford Street I Golden, CO 80401 1 Phone: 303.940.9966 x 207 Cell: 303.482.7712 1 Fax: 303.940.9959 1 www.baselinecorp.com From: Noah Nemmers Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 10:47 AM To: 'Meredith Reckert' Subject: RE: Case# PBG-15-01/Parfet Storage Hi Meredith, They have decided to incorporate the 22' drive isles and abandon the variance request. I had a couple questions I was hoping you could answer or provide guidance on. • In regard to the transparency along the Parfet is the City OK with the opaque window veneer (Fake Window). For security purposes they were avoiding a true window into these storage units but I wanted to confirm that detail was acceptable? If so it seems that the primary area of concern was the primary and secondary material coverage.? • We responded that dressing up the southern facades of Buildings B, C, and D did not seem to make sense given the screen wall along the southern property line. The response letter indicated that the comment was ignored rather than responding to our stance. Can you clarify this? The buildings are only 9 feet tall and the screen wall is 6 foot so you would not see that much of the buildings. Appreciate your help and look forward to getting this back in and scheduled for hearing. Regards, NOAH NEMMERS, P.E. I Civil Engineering Manager, Golden Baseline Engineering, Planning, & Surveying 11950 Ford Street I Golden, CO 80401 1 Phone: 303.940.9966 x 207 Cell: 303.482.7712 1 Fax: 303.940.9959 1 www.baselinecorp.com From: Meredith Reckert [maiIto: mreckert(abci.wheatridge.co. us] Sent: Monday, February 08, 2016 10:39 AM To: Noah Nemmers Cc: Dave Brossman; Greg & Angel Herbers (gaherbers(aq.com); Alan McKinster (amckinster(dken ray. biz) Subject: RE: Case# PBG-15-01/Parfet Storage Comments 2 — second of two emails Meredith Reckert, AICP Senior Planner Office Phone: 303-235-2848 FAX: 303-235-2857 Wh City of -�, .rm' LAITY DEVELOWENT 2 41 From: Noah Nemmers[mailto:noah(cbbaselinecorp.com] Sent: Monday, February 08, 2016 9:57 AM To: Meredith Reckert Cc: Dave Brossman; Greg & Angel Herbers (g_aherbers(&q.com); Alan McKinster (amckinster(&kenray.biz) Subject: RE: Case# P13G-15-01/Parfet Storage Hi Meredith, Please let us know if you have any update for us regarding this case and getting the PBG hearing scheduled? Regards, NOAH NEMMERS, f .E. I Civil Engineering Manager, Golden Baseline Engineering, Planning, & Surveying 11950 Ford Street I Golden, CO 80401 1 Phone: 303.940.9966 x 207 Cell: 303.482.7712 1 Fax: 303.940.9959 1 www.baselinecorp.com From: Noah Nemmers Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2016 10:32 AM To: 'Meredith Reckert' Cc: Dave Brossman; Greg & Angel Herbers (gaherbersft.com); Alan McKinster (amckinster@kenray.biz) Subject: RE: Case# P13G-15-01/Parfet Storage Meredith, Attached is the completed application and variance in the format requested. Any idea of the time frame necessary for them to make a decision on the granting of this variance? Also do we have to wait for the decision on this variance before we can schedule the PBG hearing? Regards, NOAH NEMMERS, P.E. I Civil Engineering Manager, Golden Baseline Engineering, Planning, & Surveying 11950 Ford Street I Golden, CO 80401 1 Phone: 303.940.9966 x 207 Cell: 303.482.7712 1 Fax: 303.940.9959 1 www.baselinecorp.com From: Meredith Reckert [maiIto: mreckert(�ci.wheatridge.co.us] Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 11:04 AM To: Noah Nemmers Cc: Dave Brossman Subject: RE: Case# P13G-15-01/Parfet Storage Thanks, Noah With regard to the variance, please complete the attached land use application and address the variance criteria for why this variance should be granted. Let me know if you have any questions. M Meredith Reckert, AICP Senior Planner Office Phone: 303-235-2848 3 City Of "� Wheatdge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building February 4, 2016 Noah Nemmers Baseline Corp 1950 Ford Street Golden, CO 80401 Dear Mr. Nemmers: 7500 W. 291h Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 This letter is in regard to the second submittal of an application filed for approval of a Planned Building Group Plan for property located at 5130 Parfet Street. The application has been reviewed and the following are comments regarding the second submittal. SHEET ONE 1. In the title indicate that this property is in the "southwest quarter of Section 16" 2. The top margin needs to be 1" per the Jefferson County Clerk and Recorder's requirements. 3. Insert the owners' name (Parfet Storage LLC) in the Declaration of Planning Building Group. 4. In the Declaration of Planning Building Group designate who will be signing as the owner. 5. In the Surveyor's Certificate, designate who will be signing. 6. Under Notes, correct the fencing citation to Section 26-603. 7. In the Project Description, correct the spelling of "consist". 8. In the Case History box, add Case No. WA -16-02. SHEET TWO 1. How will the northern portion of the western building be accessed? If access to this area occurs from the north, an access easement will be required from those property owners. 2. In the legend, the pattern for "existing building to be removed", appears to designate all proposed buildings in the graphic. Please modify this category so it is clear that these buildings are being proposed. 3. There are several areas which do not have a designation in the legend — presume that this will be landscaping. Add a category to the legend indicating so. SHEET THREE 1. In note 3. indicate that non -living landscaping shall not exceed 35% of the total landscaped coverage. 2. In the table, add percentage of total site for required and proposed landscaped coverage. MAJOR ITEMS OF CONCERN: ACCESS DRIVE AISLE WIDTHS The site plan design does not meet the City standards for interior drive aisle width. At a minimum, the interior drive must be 22' wide. It is advisable that the aisles may need to be wider to accommodate large trucks and pull -behind trailers. The 20' wide aisles that you have proposed within the development require a 2' variance. Previously, you had indicated that 20' is an "industry standard"; however, our research on the subject, indicates the typical industry standard for interior aisles is 25'. The two existing Public Storage facilities in the City both have 25' wide aisles. Other municipal standards in the metropolitan area appear to be around 30'. The Planning Commission will review the variance as part of the overall Planned Building Group review. This variance will not be supported by staff BUILDING ARCHITECTURE The building architecture included on sheets 4 — 9 does not comply with the Heavy Commercial/Industrial design standards specified in the Architectural and Site Design Manual (ASDM). These substandard items include fagade detail, fagade articulation, materials, and transparency. Even though the facades on building A have been embellished, the standards specified in the ASDM are not being met. Primary materials, which must comprise 40% of the fagade, must be one of the following materials: brick, stone, textured, colored concrete block or terra-cotta. Secondary materials, which may not exceed 60% of the fagade, are to be smooth -faced CMU, EIFS, metal panels or articulated concrete panels. Staff also requested that the southern facades of buildings B, C and D have treatment as well. This request was ignored. Although elevations of the existing house/office are not being required, please provide a narrative as to existing materials and what modifications to the exterior would be allowed, if any. Attached are referrals received from other city departments and outside agencies regarding the planned building group. Wheat Ridge Public Works: See attached letter from Dave Brossman dated January 29, 2016. This concludes the summary of comments. Please address each of these comments by revising the drawings accordingly. For clarification on any of these issues, please contact the case manager. Once changes have been made, please submit one 24" x 36" copy and one 11" x 14" copy of the revised documents. Include an electronic copy with a PDF document and an AutoCAD dwg (2010 or older) including all external reference and shx files, etc. Include in the submittal appurtenant technical documents. This case requires a single public hearing in front of Planning Commission which has not yet been scheduled. Based on the number of deficiencies of the plan without requested modifications, this application will not be supported by Staff. If you have any questions or need further clarification, do not hesitate to contact me at 303-235-2848. Sincerely, Meredith Reckert, AICP Senior Planner .K„ - ei I — UI i. , \� C.y,\Izoa-s=,.o,e 1 1., '/1/1- i 16 as w, x.11 w. '�..^'SL'L LeiCRo "gym I b! R vim ���s z4� sN'1==m� 0 1 F F F F ^ R9 wt u a p �9�p�y1 �9" i� Viggo as p�5 ,z§4Eli R x $C� QR I �2 5 q IM5 F oS' \A s�- ttW map 9 NNNA E a 03 '�..^'SL'L LeiCRo "gym I b! R vim ���s z4� sN'1==m� 0 1 F F F F ^ wt u a p �9�p�y1 �9" i� Viggo as �2 5 n $1.09vl \A s�- ttW W N 9 NNNA M 21 o Pzvrcr sr _ - " i RvuPc sr. a 1 _ � I g 89'11�1m s as IN W, 4 1 I m �z s 0 ! • PEM90N Dcsavnnr w¢vuso 6! M1E PAPLM LLC ° 'JNw ASELINE Ed PN DPER qtt PMW t-7-1SC EJEFFERSON COUNTY _ w..�w PARFET STREET MINI STORAGE EDu�n Wg Pk.* SunTn! 5130 PAFM S7FM �w v�- y - -- - aN gV H COVER --.. ___—_- _- _ NJN rssa rwmsmEFr. caoE.R cacwwo wam 0 1 F F F F ^ �9 s�- ttW W N 9 NNNA 9 � s � Pzvrcr sr _ - " i RvuPc sr. a 1 _ � I g 89'11�1m s as IN W, 4 1 I m �z s 0 ! • PEM90N Dcsavnnr w¢vuso 6! M1E PAPLM LLC ° 'JNw ASELINE Ed PN DPER qtt PMW t-7-1SC EJEFFERSON COUNTY _ w..�w PARFET STREET MINI STORAGE EDu�n Wg Pk.* SunTn! 5130 PAFM S7FM �w v�- y - -- - aN gV H COVER --.. ___—_- _- _ NJN rssa rwmsmEFr. caoE.R cacwwo wam V.\w3- -. I It— 1t� 51 11— 1 1.,, 1/12/2015 11 15. 5I . _nom vas b a 01 D O � r i 36 imp O O rZ �0 o O O 0 O 00 � Z Z ' ~ <- r, O] b a ox C) �D Z � `m m R O Z [n y �a A r PARFET $FORAGE LLC m mq v rswan a oAa NJn� P O l � CITY OF NHEATRIOGE 2 y W A µ 1-0> nci rC^J='i1 O d 0 Z tn� w r=y PARFET STREET MINI STORAGE 5130 PARFET STREET �d -_ _ -- O Eigln�Mro • Pk dq • s.wNy (71 b 01 IN imp R 4'6 �a spilE r PARFET $FORAGE LLC P�sw ocsu� ax v rswan a oAa NJn� ASELINE l � CITY OF NHEATRIOGE JEFFERSON COUNTY Nag 24 w r=y PARFET STREET MINI STORAGE 5130 PARFET STREET -_ _ -- - - - -- _ ITS Eigln�Mro • Pk dq • s.wNy K v 9 9 SITE PLAN - - --. - NJN� oao smEn. xwrcN CIXac+m mim wsw.Hse w.mmaaem� N - ----- ..;---. Y ` Illil II III I ------------------------ fill UP 111T, 11 NH aagc PABPBT S IPAGE LLCPENSN PfF qtt PENf �° °� 01°�� �gASELINE L� pW -79-i- N., � CIFV OF VMEATRIUCE JEFFERSON CCUNtt STREET MINI STORAGE 5770 PARFET SIREET LANDSCAPE PLAN LTV .. ENOII.W.1. Pkimiig S—ft NJNn frN7 cacaaw adal x.xb•eee�wmn City of "]��rWh6atRidge_ PUBLIC WORKS City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 291h Ave. Wheat Ridge. CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2861 F: 303.235.2857 January 29, 2016 Mr. Noah J. Nemmers, P.E. Jehn Engineering 1950 Ford Street Golden, CO 80401 303.940.9966 Re: Second Review Comments of the Final Drainage Report & Plan, Site Development Plan, and Civil Construction Plans for the proposed mini -warehouse buildings, Case# PBG-15-01/Parfet Storage. Dear Mr. Nemmers, I have completed the second review of the above referenced documents received on January 21, 2016, for the proposed Planned Building Group at the property located at 5130 Parfet Street, and I have the following comments: PLANNING & ZONING: Site Development Plan: As stated in the previous comments, the existing curb & gutter and proposed fence as shown on the Landscape Plan lie outside of the subject property boundary. In light of this, a copy of an Easement or Agreement from the affected adjacent property owner(s) will need to be provided to the City. Please refer to the comments from the Drainage Plan for the westerly swale for the Landscape Plan. The Civil Construction Plans and Drainage Plan are going to include riprap, sod, concrete energy dissipater(s), and other items within this swale; PW recommends coordinating with the civil engineer to identify the types and locations of these items on this Plan as they are going to affect the placement of plantings. CIVIL ENGINEERING: Final Drainage Report (Discussion): Public Works still has concerns regarding the design of the westerly swale. Please include the following in the Report: a. Section E under the Proposed (Developed) Drainage System states that "the max velocity for the channel has been designed to keep flows under 5.0 ft/sec." Given the fact that the Construction Plan Sheet C6 shows six grade changes in the profile and only one Channel Report was included in this Report, please discuss what the true ft. per second velocity is going to be for each wade change, referring to the respective Channel Report along the www.ci.wheatridge.coms Public Works Engineering January 29, 2016 Page 2 entire length of the Swale. In other words, run the Channel Report calcs for each grade change and discuss those results in the narrative. b. The grades change dramatically from one area of the Swale to another. Please note that the armoring currently proposed is inadequate and must be extended beyond the BOTTOM of the steep (25%) grades to prevent erosion. The length of the rip -rap along bottom of all steep grades as erosion protection needs to be calculated in a similar manner as if it were a culvert apron to ensure the length of the rip -rap is adequate. (Refer to the January 2016 UDFCD Volume 2, Energy Dissipation and Erosion Protection section, page 9-67). c. Native seeding has been used on the majority of Lot 2 of this property and has been demonstrated to be grossly inadequate. FYI: There is a large area on the easterly side of the existing slope of Lot 2 that is currently eroding away (carving substantial channels) and is triggering enforcement action by the City. The "native seeding" has not shown to be effective (and this is sheet flow) for this steep of a slope. Given the current proposal has nearly identical grades; PW is going to take a far more cautious approach to the design for the westerly swale, especially if the design does not appear to provide adequate stabilization. If a V-shaped channel is to be employed, then channel stabilization must be utilized for the design to be approvable. Native seeding alone will NOT qualify as stabilization for this Swale. d. Discuss that all rip -rap proposed on steep slopes such as 4:1 (25% slope) shall be grouted. For any areas where grouting is not proposed, describe in detail what measures will be employed to prevent the sediment on the Swale bottom from eroding downstream. Please note that irrigated sod may be required and possibly the use of permanent structures such as baffles could even be required to minimize velocities. While we fully understand the costs associated with it, PW still recommends that a pipe be utilized to convey the stormwater to the detention facility due to numerous challenges associated with an open channel design. Final Drainage Report (Appendix): Pertaining to the westerly swale: a. Need to provide calculations to support the current lengths of the proposed rip -rap along bottom of all steep grades (refer to Discussion comment 1 b above). b. Provide a separate Channel Report for each change in grade along the length of the Swale. Be sure to use the proper Manning's N -Value for each of the following: i. The rip -rap areas, ii. The areas to be sodded, and iii. If native seeding is proposed for any slopes, you must use a bare earth N -Value. Developed Drainage Plan: 1. "W. 23rd Ave." needs to be changed to "Parfet Street". 2. The Proposed Drainage Plan must be modified to match the Civil Construction Plan set (especially for the Swale along the westerly boundary line of Lot 2). 3. The text got cut off for the WS and Volume table (taken from the UDFCD spreadsheet). 4. In addition to channel stabilization for the rest of the westerly Swale, substantial armoring shall be required at the two proposed bends in the Swale to prevent failure due to erosion. 5. Need to provide an armored rundown into the detention facility. www.ci.wheatridge.coms 5130 Parfet St_Parfet Street Storage - Review-2.1tr Public Works Engineering January 29, 2016 Page 3 6. Show the outlet structure as remaining but that the orifice plate will need to be modified (for the EURV rather than being multi -stage). 7. Show the positioning and limits of the emergency overflow weir. Civil Construction Plans: 1. Please add this to the General Notes (Sheet C2): "20. NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR: IF MORE THAN THREE (3) STREET CUTS OCCUR WITHIN 250 LINEAR FEET, ADDITIONAL MILLING/OVERLAY REQUIREMENTS WILL APPLY. REFER TO THE TERMS OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE ROW CONSTRUCTION PERMIT (THAT MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, 303.235.2861, PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK)." 2. On Sheet C4, Site Plan: a. Please shorten the curbing on the west side of the Swale by one more foot to the west, and extend a short concrete V -pan at the top of the rundown to help direct flow and minimize by-pass. b. Delete the rip -rap hatching from extending into the curb & gutter at the top of the rundown. 3. On all sheets with a plan view: a. Regarding the westerly Swale, in order to approve an open channel design, this Swale is going to need substantial channel stabilization and armoring. There are very steep slopes and a couple of 90° bends that must be well armored to prevent failure. b. Rip -rap will need to be extended beyond the bottom of the very steep slopes (refer to the Final Drainage Report comments above), the lengths of which need to be demonstrated through hard calculations of the Channel Reports for each segment of the Swale. 4. On Sheet C6, Grading Plan - Lot 1: a. Need to provide an armored rundown from the westerly swale into the detention facility. b. Show the positioning and limits of the emergency overflow weir. ITEMS OF NOTE: CDPS Permit & Stormwater Management Plan: This site in general is greater than one acre in size and the area of disturbance will meet or exceed one (1) acre, so a Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) associated with the required State CDPS Permit shall be submitted to the City of Wheat Ridge for review and approval. The SWMP must be approved by the City prior to issuance of any Demolition, Grading, or Building Permits. The CDPS Permit is generally obtained from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment by the contractor at time of Building Permit Application. A copy of the CDPS must accompany the final submittal of the SWMP. Please contact Bill LaRow, Stormwater Program Manager at 303.235.2871 for further information). It is highly recommended that the SWMP be submitted as soon as possible to avoid delays in the issuance of required Permits. www.ci.wheatridge.com s 5130 Parfet St Parfet Street Storage - Review-2.1tr Public Works Engineering January 29, 2016 Page 4 2. Drainage Certification/ Stormwater Maintenance Agreement and O & M Plan: Please note the following items required prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the Subdivision: a. Drainage Certification: A Drainage Certification Letter from the Engineer -of -Record stating that all drainage related items were constructed per the approved civil engineering documents. The Certification Letter shall be accompanied by As -Built plans in support of the statements made in the Letter as required by the Municipal Code of Laws. b. Stormwater Maintenance Agreement and O & M Plan: All post -construction Best Management Practices (BMP's) for water quality must be maintained and inspected by the property owner(s) per Section 20-34 of the City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Code of Laws. For stormwater quality facilities including, but not limited to, above -ground or underground detention facilities, porous landscape detention areas, porous pavement, centrifuge type devices such as a Rinker Stormcepter®, hydrodynamic separation systems such as a Contech Vortechs®, or for any other approved post - construction BMP, a Stormwater Maintenance Agreement accompanied by an Operations and Maintenance (O & M) Schedule/Log shall be required prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. The O & M Schedule/Log must be kept current and will be inspected on a regular basis by City staff to ensure compliance with City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Code requirements. 4. Fees in Lieu of Construction: Since no Public Improvements currently exist along Parfet Street on either side of the subject property, fees in the amount of $7,983.38 will be taken in lieu of construction of the required Public Improvements along the 152.5' Parfet Street frontage. The fees will be due prior to issuance of any Building Permit. 5. Right -of -Way Dedication: A 20' strip of Right -of -Way along the southerly portion of Lot 2 will be required with development of Lot 2. This is to allow for future construction of W. 50th Avenue to the west of Oak Street, and will provide better access to Lot 2. The above comments are as of the date reviewed and may not reflect all comments from other departments or reviewing agencies. If you have any questions, please contact me at 303.235.2864. Regards, David F. Brossman, P.L.S. Development Review Engineer/ City Surveyor CC: Steve Nguyen, Engineering Manager Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner File H��w.ci.wheatridge.co.us 5130 Parfet St Parfet Street Storage - Review-2.1tr ,lk 4f� CERTIFICATION STATEMENT I HEREBY AFFIRM THAT THIS DRAINAGE STUDY AND PLAN FOR THE PARFET PARK MINI STORAGE PROJECT WAS PREPARED BY ME (OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION) FOR THE OWNERS THEREOF AND IS, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE SITE DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS UDFCD MANUAL AND APPROVED VARIANCES. I UNDERSTAND THATTHE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE DOES NOT AND WILL NOT ASSUME LIABILITY FOR DRAINAGE FACILITIES DESIGNED BY OTHERS. REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER STATE OF COLORADO NO. 39820 PARFET STORAGE FINAL DRAINAGE STUDY 1. INTRODUCTION A. SITE LOCATION The Parfet Storage site is located on 3.48 acres north of Interstate 70, east of Parfet Street, south of Ridge Road and the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad and northwest of Oak Street, in the City of Wheat Ridge, Jefferson County, Colorado. The project site is subdivided as Lots 1 and 2 in Parfet Park Tract 2 Replat #2 located in the northeast quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 16, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the 6th Principal Meridian. The site is surrounded by commercial development to the north and east. Single family residences border the west side of the site. Undeveloped agricultural land borders the south side of the site. Vehicular access is provided from Parfet Street in the northwest corner of the site. B. SITE DESCRIPTION An existing single family home in the northwest portion of the site is currently being used for commercial purposes. The southern portion of the site is undeveloped and is crossed by both the Swadley and Wadsworth irrigation ditches. The Swadley Ditch drains from west to east through the center of the site within a 36" pipe. A large portion of Lot 2 was recently covered with fill dirt to create a flatter site which has been covered with recycled concrete. A small detention basin located on the south end of Lot 2 with a controlled outlet was designed and approved in 2010 and has been graded at the base of the slope, just south of the Wadsworth Ditch. Topography on the site slopes southerly at 2 to 40 percent grades. The ground cover around the outside edges of the site is characterized by native weeds and grasses, along with deciduous and coniferous tree, while the center of the site is primarily covered by the recycled concrete. The Soils Conservation Service soil survey mapping shows both Nunn clay loam (0-2%) and Ustic Torriorthents, loamy (15.50%), as the native soils in the area (U.S. Department of Agriculture). These soils belong primarily to hydrologic soil group C. C. PROPOSED PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed improvements to the site are to be constructed in phases. The initial phase is to develop Lot 1 with 6 new mini -warehouse storage units and improvements to the existing residence to convert it to office space. The second phase to be located on Lot 2 is anticipated to be developed with additional storage units, plans for Lot 2 have not been developed at this time. Imperviousness on Lot 1 with both building and pavement improvements will total approximately 85% of the lot. Phase 2 imperviousness is assumed to total approximately 80% of the lot though in its current state it is likely closer to 40% with the recycled asphalt surfacing. The existing detention pond is proposed to be slightly enlarged and improved with phase 1 (Lot 1 improvements) to accommodate the initial phase of improvements and existing conditions on Lot 2. D. FLOOD HAZARD AND DRAINAGE STUDIES RELEVANTTO SITE The project site is located within Zone C, according to the Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Map panel 08059CO211F (February 5, 2014). Zone C contains areas of minimal flooding. Existing drainage studies affecting the site include, "Final Drainage Report Hoss Electric", prepared by Jones Engineering Associates, Inc. on December 13, 2010. 2. HISTORIC DRAINAGE SYSTEM A. MAJOR BASIN The project site is a north bank tributary to Clear Creek, which is located approximately one mile south of the site. Historically, the Parfet Storage site drains southerly in a sheet flow condition to the existing detention pond and released at a controlled rate southerly to the undeveloped land located immediately south of the site. An analysis of the historic drainage pattern has been prepared. The hydrologic analysis and hydraulic design for the site is based on the criteria established in the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual (Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, 1999/2001) and the City of Wheat Ridge Site Drainage Requirements. The Rational Method was used to calculate peak runoff flows for the sub -basins (refer to forms SF -2 and SF -3 in appendices). Runoff flows were analyzed for the 5 -year and 100 -year storms, in conformance with City of Wheat Ridge criteria. B. SUB -BASIN AND SITE DRAINAGE In the historic condition the project site is divided into two basins. • Basin OS -1 (0.10 acres) consists of a undeveloped land that currently drains offsite to the north and east. • Basin H1 (1.18) encompasses the majority of the site, with flows moving from north to south and from west to east. These flows are typically captured in an existing gutter at the south edge of Lot 1, where they are intended to be conveyed to the east and then routed to the existing detention pond via overland flow. There are deficiencies in the existing site grading that prevent complete capture of these flows and much of the sheet flow exits the property without being detained in its current state. The existing detention facility was sized to be in compliance with City criteria for the current imperviousness on Lot 1 and existing conditions on Lot 2. Based on the previous design it was intended to provide Water quality capture volume (WQCV) as well as 5 and 100 year storage and release detained runoff at restricted rates to the south edge of the property. Per the original design the minor and major release rates were 0.5 cfs and 3.1 cfs during the respective storm events. 2 3. PROPOSED (DEVELOPED) DRAINAGE SYSTEM A. CRITERIA 1) The developed site in Lot 1 will consist of two basins. • Basin OS -1 (0.04 acres) consists of a small portion of landscaped area at the north end of the site that drains to the adjacent property in the historic condition. Any runoff from this basin will be compensated for in the final detention volume. • Basin P1( 1.18 acres) encompasses most of the site in Lot 1. This basin will contain the existing building to remain and 6 new storage buildings, along with associated asphalt and concrete paving. This basin drains to the south and east, typically, where it is captured by the existing curb and cutter along the south property line. Roof drainage is to be collected in an underdrain system to help minimize surface runoff and icing in the winter. Both the surface flows and the underdrain system from Lot 1 will release to a proposed swale running along the west property line of Lot2, where they will eventually terminate in the detention pond. Roof drains will be piped underground and daylight into the proposed swale. For the purposes of this analysis, Design Point 1 is placed at the southern boundary of Lot 1, where flows discharge onto Lot 2. 2) For this analysis, the Rational Method was used. Standard Forms for the historic and proposed conditions can be found in the appendices. 3) For this analysis Design storm frequencies of (5 -yr) and major (100 -yr) storms were used. B. RUNOFF 1) For basin OS -1 the developed runoff will be 0.02 cfs in the 5 -yr event and 0.12 cfs in the 100 -yr event. For Basin P1, the runoff will be 4.14 cfs in the minor event and 7.76 cfs in the major event. 2) Runoff from Basin OS -1 will have a negligible impact on the adjacent property. Flows from Basin P1 are expected to be fully captured. 3) A grass lined swale will transport flows from Lot 1 to the improved detention pond at the south end of Lot 2. C. DETENTION The existing pond was located on the south end of Lot 2 was designed and approved in 2010 with the Hoss Electric Drainage Plans. This pond and outlet structure was designed to control WQCV, 5 -yr, and 100 -yr release from the site. To bring it into compliance with current standards the pond and outlet structure will be modified to Full -Spectrum detention and EURV and 100 -yr (two-stage) volume and release rates. Below is a summary of the calculations and modifications: 3 1) The existing pond will be re -graded and expanded to accept the additional runoff volume from the proposed development. 2) The volumes required and provided per the UDFCD spreadsheet in the Appendix are: A. Excess Urban Runoff (EURV)=0.26 Acre-feet. EURV includes water quality. B. 100 -yr: 100% EURV + the full 100 -yr detention volume=0.55 Acre-feet 3) The existing structure has a grate elevation of 5387.45 which will be appropriate to control the EURV volume using a new orifice plat on the front of the structure. With the proposed pond re -grading the 100 -yr water surface elevations will be controlled at 5388.50 with an additional foot of freeboard provided. 4) The release rates for the 100 -yr and EURV are based upon a 72 -hour maximum time to Completely drain the EURV from the pond. The release rates for the EURV will be controlled with a new orifice plat on the front of the structure. The 100 year release rate The Drainage Plan needs to be modified to match the Construction Plans. Given the fact that the Construction Plans (Sheet C6) show six grade ith steel grate and 18 changes in the profile, and only one Channel Report was included in this the plans for the pond Report, please discuss what the true ft. per second velocity is going to be for each grade change along the entire length of the swale. You will also need to inimum pond bottom provide a separate Channel Report for each change in grade along the length of the swale in the Appendix. Be sure to use the proper Manning's N -Value for each of the following: e berm, and maintain i. The rip -rap areas, h -ide of the berm and ii. The areas to be sodded, and ii. Wherever native seeding is proposed, you must use a bare earth N -Value. tol release the EURV at appropriate rates per the UDFCD spreadsheet in the Appendix. 11) The outlet structure design shall incorporate the standard Whe t Ridge Well Screen: U.S. Filter Stainless Steel Well -Screen, or approved equivalent, usi g #93 vee wire with 0.139" openings between the wires. D. No public streets will be impacted as part of this design. E. The grass swale located along the west side of the site was designed to minimize erosion and improve the water quality being released from the upper lot. The max velocity for the channel has been designed to keep flows under 5.0 ft/sec. The max flow depth in the channel for the 100 -yr developed flow is approximately 6 inches with an additional 1 foot of freeboard provided. Erosion protection measures have been implemented in the design where needed. Armored rip -rap drops have been incorporated in the swale following Chapter 9 of the UDFCD Manual. F. No new storm sewers or culverts are incorporated in this design. Roof drains will be piped into an underdrain system that will release the minor storm into the grass swale and be conveyed to the detention pond. Major storm runoff that exceeds the roof drain capacity with flow overland into the grass Swale. 11 4. CONCLUSIONS A. DISCUSS IMPACT OF IMPROVEMENT The proposed drainage design has been prepared for the initial phase of the storage warehouse use proposed on Lot 1. The intended construction does not include any public streets. A drainage swale been designed to convey both minor and major storm events with additional freeboard. Runoff released from the modified detention facility has been designed to control the EURV and 100 -yr release rates using the existing outlet structure with appropriate modifications. B. STATE COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE CRITERIA The drainage conveyance and detention volume has been designed in compliance with The City of Wheat Ridge Site Drainage Requirements and UDFCD manual. C. FLOOD HAZRD No floodplains shall be impacted by this project. 61 5. REFERENCES City of Wheat Ridge Site Drainage Requirements October, 2014 Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual, Vol. 1, 2 and 3, Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, Denver, Colorado, Current Version. Civil Engineering Reference Manual, Ninth Edition, Michael R. Lindeburg, P.E., 2003. Final Drainage Report, Hoss Electric, Jones Engineering Associates Inc., December 13, 2010. 6 Channel Report Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. Thursday, Oct 15 2015 Western Swale Triangular Highlighted Side Slopes (z:1) = 5.20, 5.20 Depth (ft) = 0.55 Total Depth (ft) = 1.50 Q (cfs) = 7.760 Area (sqft) = 1.57 Invert Elev (ft) = 5425.00 Velocity (ft/s) = 4.93 Slope (%) = 8.33 Wetted Perim (ft) = 5.82 N -Value 0.035 Crit Depth, Yc (ft) = 0.68 To Width ft = 5.72 Calculations Describe in the narrative of the Report how this Compute by: Known Q Manning's N -Value will be achieved (e.g., irrigated Known Q (cfs) = 7.76 sod shall be placed immediately following grading, Elev (ft) 5427.00 5426.50 5426.00 5425.50 5425.00 5424.50 2 4 6 8 etc.). OR, re -run the calculations using the N -Value for bare earth. In addition, since it appears there are several different grades along the proposed swale, please include Channel Reports for each different grade segment. Section Depth (ft) 10 Reach (ft) 12 14 16 18 20 rla l.� 1.50 1.00 0.50 M w.w WrtUiYJ N3.lAD 13ius Wpi eie Nf N - 11N00 E e c � 7 173NL5 13iWd OCLS e ° _ 39MIS INIW 133815 13321tld � 9 k g e v - - -- 3N113Sd9� Nl NnOJNOSL3j 3001LLY3NM 0 q NrN --s- rrx--.Yav,�e un ex axwe y1'I HflYi1QIS J.gdZIYd ° € die : �� 6 y B c kk��3t tl 14 8�8� ..� 80 919 I LAJ Z WJ N 's �3 v 's bpi g � ii o;Ia p s pfi ��W iE �rn EC+7 a � big �F L F g gi11 x tR b oil IL �@N 9191 1 neiii 01 �9 bpi g ii o;Ia pfi ��W iE 6 EC+7 a b 1 big �F g gi11 x tR b oil IL al 52 waauro>m N3�K•i3usawi asa a NfN - eupwn� 3NI13SV8 V YNrN 9102 -i0 WH M3N9tlllObNQ£Ntl 3 �a s skY y( yy r a �+ 3 a NVIa MIS MIS MWd 19 30V60iS INIW 1338LS 13JNVd 3001MV3M JO 110 om gOYNOIS saduvd ga � V _ z e b s a rse O Q w 0 �" �w - w o i z N Z �O ¢ O 17 O O O U � I U w I ' W I Z w C� 0 0 L � w rr- Mss W o mss N �'H vJww Fr d U O W yg Rid 3Eg NOS63JJ3f NVIa MIS MIS MWd 19 30V60iS INIW 1338LS 13JNVd 3001MV3M JO 110 om gOYNOIS saduvd ga � e b s z -EQ O I ba € g I � I ' W I 13 yg Rid Is .Lamd m -M . ssssnreraa . Auoeemra Nfrn NYId 3dVOSUNtl, 5 R q a OO�LVUJ NNm 133WSQMMID LMS MWd 009 p qi eylwas. EuNmld.EowwEevd YAi, - -_- __ -- - -- - — 3DVdOiS ININ 13381S 13JNVd 3NIl3Sb�8` xrx -- NOOJNOSb3ii3 941lltl3WN 0 IJ@7771 968 �en NI'N 91oZ-Ba-10 M3N3L uD Y3d Q35N3tl 2 7 V iN „� �,� R �.,� ,. nor s..� n.oUzv. s � � _ �s vozcv�s�:•o,7�m.�s r, ._ , , o - e.,a � v 1 �'b \ \III V 111 \ I, I I 11 uA6-d '67/ I I 1 'ZS ,LH"Vd I I R �.,� ,. nor s..� n.oUzv. s � � _ �s vozcv�s�:•o,7�m.�s r, ._ , , o - e.,a � v 0M-ns EulmdNaH 133HIS L39IVd DCIS OIN 1tl3W0 10S INM 133aS 13JHVd llN]NOSa33f 33N113Sdw _e v :a a�wesla xoureslo xoavai Old 30H2101S 13d21b'd 4 38 tJ NO ¢a�I i moo. A wki���� ��eR9� W LU(Al jag �e co w c� 3 0 �'INK 1, Y@Gq a ss Mall :292 q^ w Y �L U mpg^ Z� U LJJ a o is i�ara � z p W '/fir/ co = qoq - N gLg': gg Z _ s;OQ308C 80L'cY Q or a o im ;U NrN -_ S3LON 1tl83N39 --_ - -.- - - - Im Y -- —---.-_ - - .- NS 131Wd Of IS �55-ryuy.tuumaN 30V8O1S IIN 133815 13JUVd NnO3001H 1tl3N40 UD NrN nsuaw0 NOSa3i3r3NIl3S v Jul 39V2101S 13d?1Vd a a a s fiWmR P. an��� =a a e gig.do Rif gilt gIt hgNag ��� 9 lail F, o � 9 a g� a s a m �k E �d as a a s g� Hog ��f a!� R§ � � In �� � � spa- Pam ad a$ §a a �� H, a € .1-1 ems§ � a � m a as i g` a �g WHI10H ft,M i4 '.m `� 5 m e gg N a` a mW g <k� m5 m m m g 3 v> F s $ c8 grv. m� cm 5 i€ me m m �a �; my 19 $ g e a e ofs=6 ffi-� as �`W� A" a @m a8 Ba ems. e a a a ae z a.ee WR o e w h m as EEm C `ae �ag �� nag � �� a�e � �S` � �"€ $$ a � as a ga�3 "€$ s� 9 $ �� ea � � m s $4s A &m % �€ V� M :a ;N Eli � A a e.a �9 P aPe15 e � 6a gege € w� m e e $ < Ant e� 4 a g qqr eggg 9 pp e g a Sn$� g3� 5ag. gm ism aW� ka m @ C �$ g_ 3 e mag e 40 FX k e a a m @ �� E' n� a �i_ � � � g m e s � § $ JJR8 9s �ga e a s � � a a �� m may a Ill!: a ��a I m fig_ a° n s m .a zWm ga 45ge - e IR ma H w e' a m n a b� eta HN19110 No g a �a s 84 s e $ c k� mq w g a 61 ?-5 a� a IV 8.a a � g {»a � � � � m Q � RQ a � $ `� �a 19 �a $ H-21 m ai �� a � A e$ rE i 141. am Y m€ n� E m Pa. a�a Sf�� z 3paR g> g g E € a g m € _ m Ls. a sa �> O m 11! 21 9 $11 e�g�� � � safe �1 mm � � ;� ��� a� 3 � '�� �4ff a� z =�J�� Ig rs�_ dem me 9a a g e Ea- Aga �a o a: €e Rm ❑m g g and mg aW a $m $a i4wgg 7iy AC, �is 3� e: �YNm oma asap g aF QEF L'�ffe; 0 �s oI�d` O,O<Y Fri pgu� S V�G� ------ ------ ----------- Z 0, - Nr — — — - _ NVId a k a auve\,n . au�uuo . wpmu�au - -- 1311U 131INd Gls ��'.+•a yaF,+ Sn u u 30V2101S INIW 133HIS 13AVd A1N qJ NOSa3i 3f OP 1V3 N j0 IJ 3 N I l 3 SdB& "r 9102 -Po 10 Nrx — x3Nld o xa oax5a 5 07 30V801S 13JHVd o nra .;e usnaad rau�a wsvau €s € e b � Zo 111, 'IX I � Y 1 III \ \ II _-- zf tl ci C tl ���SCCCtStltldtidtSC e� ��. 2 C 0 © T QgQg ------ ------ ----------- Z 0, - saw N + N Na Bo L� 5 9102/64/: 'Swp'I aso�d �I"�J—A02L\s5u;no�a\a6ou15 '�'N La .5 . ,,, , Zo 111, 'IX I 1 III \ \ II _-- saw N + N Na Bo L� 5 9102/64/: 'Swp'I aso�d �I"�J—A02L\s5u;no�a\a6ou15 '�'N La .5 . ,,, , gig 133d1S i,ljdyd NrN -- ------Nvid MIS& " E0MUMS. k—id-E°y-A3 L33HLS 3Md OC19 -- - - wHH-.--- 3�tl2JO1S INIYV 1332llS 13j21tld NON NOSL3 3f OI 1tl3WA 0 AlIJ 6� g?M 1 p f 3NI13Sb�8� M3N3tl UO tl3d P35N3tl bpN i �S . OIN NrN Ml 3`JV2101S 13d21Vd Y �E vra Aa anndra :nu�acn wsrx� gig 133d1S i,ljdyd .. NrN - l 1O1 - NY1d ONIOV89 5 133&S MWd OftS bli.n.6NI.w.UP-161 30V801S ININ 133NIS 13JNVd ma tv3w ao A113Nroo Ns11131 N11 J� 3JV201S 13aVdKD' 3NI13Sd8 ®pgg4 R1�k% 1eqQS�Fc1& e"eQ ns � 0 ----------------------- / II j IIS II j I� I I I I _.__-___ -- II b\ I i IIII 'n j III T�II ' �H \\I `� 's"--' �, 1 I \\\\\\\`_ � • __-__ `` ___� ``______- 1Z ;, �'r% %sir k�� III \\ \`____�'__I j � I 7 sit ISI n9i�� R \ cn, - I I,l I �e� A 3t i 1 so�db _sSs€ o aF7�� it �..�ul 'rjl�\ c � � ., .. � ✓ III .AI' - 3 _� II II II - 'L54 M/SY iLOD N 1 I I R 1 1` I _- - g.__- - �� — - (MOS ,09) \`I p'I 1133d1S 13AVd- 1 z R =, ., 1 N_ a. Io s "W"A P 1, lo,° t\--,\-1- � N , , ._ I ._. 1J 1pA eW-19 ----------------------- / II j IIS II j I� I I I I _.__-___ -- II b\ I i IIII 'n j III T�II ' �H \\I `� 's"--' �, 1 I \\\\\\\`_ � • __-__ `` ___� ``______- 1Z ;, �'r% %sir k�� III \\ \`____�'__I j � I 7 sit ISI n9i�� R \ cn, - I I,l I �e� A 3t i 1 so�db _sSs€ o aF7�� it �..�ul 'rjl�\ c � � ., .. � ✓ III .AI' - 3 _� II II II - 'L54 M/SY iLOD N 1 I I R 1 1` I _- - g.__- - �� — - (MOS ,09) \`I p'I 1133d1S 13AVd- 1 z R =, ., 1 N_ a. Io s "W"A P 1, lo,° t\--,\-1- � N , , ._ I ._. Zlnals l33uvaxaIs ,.;SE°.. D* --S. 0'R-W.OW—IeN3 - _ Yrva� - +z��RS j� 30V80i IN W 1332llS 13jiIVd 9 A s 3NIl3Sd8�Y N007NOStl3 3f 91tl1tl3W 10 UO �i g U NrN MgxgNuousaa;svu Jl� 3`JVNOlS 13A2�Vd �°>a`°•'� gtllqq€ ��e s,oa" N a amnio rousosaN xosysN 42 —(nsa)–.slscessr a -- --- __—- ——\— ZA / 1 - - - - -- Vvvv HO110 vv _ _WIMP 3slsraex IIIIIIiI11I�1 // i/ _--- -' I 1 �I1��1�1111111 III / I II i I I I I 1 1 1 - _- ��1�1��1�11111/- IIII III IIIIII 1 I I I I I ,_ '1 II!!II,IY/ I1 1 , i Ity g N 0 [t98(S 3Nd NtWtS IL _ LCtb[S III cszus n3u / / r w%sps .mal.---- ._..__._. .. /^ I ii I i / r I I 9tNDK ATg a ji a I I. I R� pX � sZr2 Zf. s �R 9. Lwq�I asln SW ;t' �..._�I. IIII � I I �I III II I I I I - WSIrS uxn 5H 1 I I I elvers Ic ars I101d6083 133x1513fWMIS _ ._ - - a�N�oNo5a33� S INIW AMTS 13AHVd 300I7Id3W,o39ViO13NIl3Sd9& e v 011 30V2101S 13J21Hd ! l I 5 ------------------------- ,-----,- - - - - - - ,� l III 1, I alV vi II 1 I�^ I I r ; � Z —'o R +� • n rv� s o s slot/e./i - 4n ? m. \ ',\oeo,ol� ,.s - s /, January 8, 2016 Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner 'SBA S E L I N E City of Wheat Ridge Public Works & Community Development Engineering Planning Surveying 7500 W. 29th Ave 9 9 9' Y 9 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 mreckert@ci.wheatridge.co.us RE: 15-123947GP, Grading Permit Application for PIN:69-194-00-004 and 69-203-00-002 Ms. Reckert, We have addressed comments received from you on November 12, 2015. This letter records your comments and our responses to them in blue. We trust that these revisions are adequate to allow the PBG to proceed to hearing. Please refer to the revised plans accompanying this letter for the changes listed here: Comments from Community Development: Sheet One: 1. All sheet numbers in the document should be sheet of Response: Sheet numbers are displayed in bottom right corner Retitle the document as follows: "Parfet Street Mini Storage Planned Building Group An Official Development Plan in the City of Wheat Ridge Located in the Southwest of Section 16, Range 69 West of the 6th PM City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado" All pages in the plan set should have the same title. Response: Title has been changed 3. The border at the top of the page should be at least 1" in width per Jefferson County requirements. Response: Noted 4. Please provide a description of the project. Address proposed use, site layout, architecture, access into the site, etc. Also indicate that this development plan is for the northern lot only and that prior to any site development on the south, a site plan process will be required. Response: Project description added 5. Add a case history box with the following case numbers: WZ-12-02, WZ-03-08, MS -02-07, WZ-10-08, MS -10-04, WZ-14- 15, PBG -15-01 Response: case history box has been added 6. In the surveyors' certificate, designate who will be signing the document. Response: Changed as stated 7. Add the following note: and development code. Response: Note added Corporate Headquarters Downtown Golden 1950 Ford Street Golden, Colorado 80401 Ph 303.940.9966 Fax 303.940.9959 Fencing shall be consistent with Section 26-60 of the Wheat Ridge zoning High Plains Rocky Mountains Downtown Greeley Ski Village 710 11th Avenue, Suite 105 419 Oak Street, PO Box 770152 Greeley, Colorado 80631 Steamboat Springs, Colorado 80477 Ph 970.353.7600 Ph 970.879.1825 Fax 970.353.7601 Fax 866.242.9106 Pagel 2 Wheat Ridge_ResponseComments 8. Add the following note: Landscaping shall be consistent with Section 26-502 of the Wheat Ridge zoning and development code. Response: Note added 9. Add the following note: Parking shall be consistent with Section 26-501 of the Wheat Ridge zoning and development code. Response: Note added 10. Add the following note: Site and building lighting shall be consistent with Section 26-503 of the Wheat Ridge zoning and development code. Response: Note added 11. Add the following note: Signage shall be consistent with Article VII of the Wheat Ridge zoning and development code. Response: Note added 12. Add the following note: The building and design standards will follow the Architectural and Site Design Manual. Response: Note added 13. Modify the Owner's signature to be a Declaration of Planned Building Group. Response: Changed as stated 14. Modify the City Clerk and Mayor's signature line so they are separated. Response: Changed as stated 15. Add a signature block for the Public Works Director Response: Changed as stated 16. Add a signature block for the Planning Commission chairman. Response: Changed as stated 17. In the Site Data Table, modify the zoning to be Industrial -Employment (I -E) Response: Changed as stated 18. In the Site Data Table, delete the proposed use category as this can be included in the Character of the Development. Response: Proposed use category has been deleted 19. In the Site Data Table, indicate that this is for the northern lot only. Response: Indicated this is for the northern lot only is the legal description 20. In the Site Data Table, make sure the combined coverages have the correct total — 53,086 square feet versus 53,158 as shown. Response: Total coverages is 53,155 per platted acreage. Totals have been revised to match. 21. In the Site Data Table, remove the categories for Existing Gross Floor Area and Proposed Gross Floor Area. Response: Changed as stated 22. In the Site Data Table, designate the allowed height as 35' and the proposed heights for both the office and the storage units. Pagel 3 Wheat Ridge_ResponseComments Response: Per Sec. 26-220. B. 1 - Industrial -Employment District (I -E). The maximum height is Fifty (50) feet. The table has been revised to note this change and the existing height of the two story office/residence that exists. No buildings on Lot 1 are proposed to be taller that this. 23. In the Site Data Table, remove the category for Number of Residential Units unless the office structure will have an ancillary residence". Please address in the description of the project. Response: There will be a residence for the site manager and this is noted in the table and added to the description. 24. In the Site Data Table, insufficient parking is provided. Response: The required parking is based on 2 residential spaces and 1 office space (1/300 sf) for a total of 3 spaces required. 4 Spaces have been provided. 25. Please modify that the providing fire district is Arvada, not Wheat Ridge. Response: Changed as stated Sheet Two: 1. The site plan does not meet the standards for interior drive width. At a minimum, the City's interior drive width should be 22' and may need to be wider to accommodate emergency vehicles. Typically 26' is required for a fire lane. Response: Based on our meeting with the Fire Department they are willing to allow the interior drive widths at 20' and fire lanes at 24'. The 20' width is adequate since this is not a parking lot and vehicle traffic will only be present when storage access is needed. 2. Insufficient parking is provided on this plan. Can additional spaces be striped on the eastern portion of the drive? Response: The required parking is based on 2 residential spaces and 1 office space (1/300 sf) for a total of 3 spaces required. 4 Spaces have been provided. 3. The separation between the rear of the office and building F needs to be increased. Perhaps if the parking area is flipped it will help. Response: The layout for Building F has been revised. 4. Please clarify how the thin connection between buildings F and G will be used. Response: The thin connection represents shallow storage units. Attached is a floor plan for reference. 5. Correct the spelling of "storage". Response: spelling corrected 6. Please lengthen the stacking distance at the entrance gate. Response: There is approximately 40 feet of stacking distance from the edge of pavement to the entrance gate. This is the maximum distance possible without the swing gates being in conflict with the internal circulation. 7. How will trash pick-up be handled? Please address as a note and show location with screening. Response: Dumpsters will not be provided on site as this tends to promote storage owners to use the site as a landfill for discarded storage items. 8. Correct the street name. Response: Street has been changed to Parfet St. 9. Correct the name of the planned development to the north. Response: The name has been corrected. Pagel 4 Wheat Ridge_ResponseComments 10. On Lot 2, specify that a separate site plan review will be necessary prior to development of Lot 2. Response: Specified with a leader Sheet Three: 1. The site plan does not meet the standards for interior drive width. At a minimum, the City's interior drive width should be 22' and may need to be wider to accommodate emergency vehicles. Typically 26' is required for a fire lane. Response: Please refer to Sheet Two response comments above. 2. Insufficient parking is provided on this plan. Can additional spaces be striped on the eastern portion of the drive? Response: Please refer to Sheet Two response comments above. 3. The separation between the rear of the office and building F needs to be increased. Perhaps if the parking area is flipped it will help. Response: Please refer to Sheet Two response comments above. 4. Please clarify how the thin connection between buildings F and G will be used. Response: Please refer to Sheet Two response comments above. 5. Correct the spelling of "storage". Response: spelling corrected 6. Please lengthen the stacking distance at the gate. Response: Please refer to Sheet Two response comments above. 7. Correct the street name. Response: Street has been changed to Parfet St. 8. Correct the name of the planned development to the north. Response: Please refer to Sheet Two response comments above. 9. On Lot 2, specify that a separate site plan review will be necessary prior to development of Lot 2. Response: Specified with a leader 10. Add the following note: All landscaped areas shall be served by a zoned, automatic irrigation system. Response: Note added 11. Expand the landscape information to address living versus non -living coverage. Response: This ground cover information has been added to the Legend. 12. Designate ground cover. Response: The groundcover has been noted on the plan and in the Legend. 13. Add the following note: Individual tree and shrub species will be established by a landscape plan and approved by staff during the building permit review process. Response: Note added Sheet Four: 1. The building architecture included on sheets 4 —12 is inconsistent with the Heavy Commercial/Industrial design standards specified in the Architectural and Site Design Manual. That would include fagade design, materials, transparency and screening. This is especially true for the Pagel 5 Wheat Ridge_ResponseComments western fagade of the western -most structure. Staff also requested that the northern and southern facades of building A and the southern facades of Buildings B, C and D have treatment as well. Response: The elevations of Building A along Parfet as well as the northern and southern facades have been revised. The intent is a barn style frontage with fake windows and wood trim. We do not feel the southern facades of Buildings B, C and D need additional treatment since there will be a screen fence running along the entire south line of Lot 1. The height of the fence and additional slope to the south impedes any views of those facades. For the ease of the reader, could sheets 4 —12 be reduced down to showing typicals, thus eliminating several pages of the plan set. Response: We have kept these sheets in the set with this submittal. Photometric Plan: 1. Renumber this sheet so it is consistent with the numbering system on the rest of the sheets Response: Revised as noted. If any freestanding light fixtures are proposed, please include details. Response: No freestanding fixtures are proposed. Other: 1. For publication purposes, please email a boundary legal description in Word format to mreckert@ci.wheatridge.co.us. Response: Please find the attached legal description in Word format. Comments from Public Works: Site Development Plan: 1. "W. 23rd Ave." needs to be changed to "Parfet Street" (on ALL plans and sheets). Response: Street name has been changed on all sheets 2. It appears the proposed fence shown on the Landscape Plan lies outside of the subject property boundary. If the owner of the subject property wishes to construct a 6' high fence within this area, said owner shall construct the fence within the bounds of the subject property or obtain an easement to construct and maintain a fence from the adjoining land owner. Response: The developer is in discussions with the adjacent land owner for the fence placement and maintaining the area where the existing curb encroaches. Per the plan view on the Landscape Plan, the existing curb & gutter on the entrance drive appears to have been constructed outside of the subject property and built on the adjoining property to the south. If this is indeed the case, prior to City approval of the current proposal either one of the following two must occur: a. The existing curb & gutter shall be removed and reconstructed within the subject property boundary, OR b. An easement to allow for the future maintenance and reconstruction of the existing curb & gutter shall be obtained from the property owner(s) to the south and a copy of the recorded easement provided to the City. Response: The developer is aware of the existing curb encroachment and is working with the adjacent land owner to obtain and execute and easement. 4. Please be advised that no grading shall occur and no drainage facilities such as ponds, swales, channels, pipes, or any other stormwater conveyance, shall be constructed within two (2) feet of the property boundary. As such, the proposed swale on the west side of the driveway to Lot 2 will need to be revised so the grading for the swale is at least two (2) feet from the property line. (The swale will need to be Pagel 6 Wheat Ridge_ResponseComments redesigned anyway as the slope is far too steep — refer to comment #6 under the FDR discussion below). Response: The swale has been revised to maintain a 2 foot buffer from the adjacent property. The slope of the swale is designed to keep the velocity below 5 ft/s in order to minimize erosion. Terracing of the swale has been implemented to further reduce the slope. The steeper sections of the terrace are armored and the drops are in accordance with UDFCD Standards. 5. Subsequent to discussions with the Community Development Department it appears the design may be changing, so Public Works will hold off on any substantive comments until the next submittal. Response: We have worked out the site layout with Planning and Fire and have not made any changes to the building layout. It is our understanding that the above comments represent the entirety of the Engineering review for the project Final Drainage Report (Discussion): 1. GENERAL COMMENT: Please use complete sentences in the Discussion portion of the Report rather just than copying text from the City -standard outline. Response: Noted. The report has been revised accordingly while maintaining the City outline. 2. Include a description of the additional modifications needed to allow for the completion of the full build -out condition to complete Phase 2 (accounting for the stated 80% imperviousness on Lot 2). Response: Lot 2 imperviousness is an assumed maximum and noted for planning purposes only. 3. Under Section 3 B., Runoff: a. The runoff from Lot 1 is to be conveyed across Lot 2 to a detention/WQ facility also located on Lot 2. As such, Public Works highly recommends that the detention volume and the drainage in general for the ENTIRE site be accounted for in this design (including Lot 2). It is obvious that the owner knows what he is going to build (80% impervious), so there's no reason not to design for this now. Therefore, the runoff calculations should include sub -basin information for Lot 2. Response: The 80% impervious is an estimate and is likely high as there is a significant slope that will likely limit the development on Lot 2. The owner prefers not to lock into a drainage design that would likely need to be altered at a later date. b. The proposed swale exceeds the maximum allowable slope of 6%; an alternative conveyance such as a pipe w/drop MH structure is more appropriate. Response: We feel that the pipe is an unnecessary approach to convey the runoff rate from the upper developed lot as the impervious area is just under 1 acre. The revised swale adequately conveys the flows at a manageable flow rate that is appropriate for an open swale. 4. Need to discuss the proposed underdrain system, including what quantity of ground water is anticipated and where this is to be discharged (e.g., if it is to be discharged into the detention facility this volume shall be accounted for in the basin sizing). Response: The underdrain system has been added into the report discussion under Basin P1. This system conveys the roof drainage that is already incorporated into the pond sizing for Basin P1. 5. Under Section 3 C., Detention : a. Remove the first paragraph regarding proximity to a major drainageway as this does not apply to this project. Response: The first paragraph has been removed b. It is stated in sub -section 4 that the Excess Urban Runoff Volume (EURV) method of the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD) will be the design employed, which is great and actually encouraged by the City. However, it is also stated the existing outlet structure is going to remain, which cannot happen without the structure being modified. Response: Modifications include a new orifice plate and restrictor plate to control the EURV and 100 -yr release from the structure. Pagel 7 Wheat Ridge_ResponseComments c. Sub -section 5 needs to be revised. Please note that the EURV design uses a two-stage outlet structure rather than the multi -stage of the standard EDB/WQCV design, so a statement that the existing structure shall be reconstructed to be a 2 -stage system (EURV & 100 -yr) rather that the multi -stage design of the WQCV, 5 -yr, 100 -yr system is needed. Response: Modifications include a new orifice plate and restrictor plate to accommodate the EURV and 100 -yr restrictions. The 5yr orifice on the existing structure will be covered by the new plate restricting the EURV release. d. Sub -section 6 & 7 states that "a concrete trickle channel will not be employed." Public Works highly recommends the use of a 2' wide concrete trickle channel be employed in all EDB's to ensure long-term functionality of the basin. What we have found is that over time the basin bottom will tend to become irregular and not fully drain, which leads to creation of a shallow - water mosquito habitat. In addition, if no channel is used and the pond does become a nuisance, the property owner will be required to mitigate the mosquito problem on a continual basis. Response: A 2' wide trickle channel has been incorporated into the pond improvements. 6. Under section E it is stated that the grass swale complies with the UDFCD criteria, which not the case. While it may be true that the velocity is under the 5 ft./sec maximum per Urban Drainage, they also require the longitudinal slope be between 0.20%<0.60%, (as found in the referenced Table MD -3). Since he proposed slope for this channel exceeds 8%, Public Works suggests that a pipe with drop manhole be employed and that the open channel design be either abandoned or include armoring and terracing. Response: The previous reference to the UDFCD Major Drainage Channel standards does not apply to the swale proposed as this is not an UDFCD maintenance eligible conveyance. Since the flows are generated from an impervious area totaling less than 1 acre we utilized a common sense approach in combination with Chapter 9 of the manual (Hydraulic Structures) to the design the swole and the owner will be responsible for maintenance. The drops that have been added are 7. In Section 7 it is stated that "no new storm sewer has been prepared..." Please refer to the above comment # 6. Response: We maintain that no new storm sewer is needed for the development of Lot 1. The underdrain system has been added to this discussion. 8. In the Conclusions it is stated that "the proposed drainage design has been prepared for the initial phase of the storage warehouse use proposed on Lot 1." Please refer to comment 3a above. Response: We only intend to prepare the design for Lot 1 at this time. Final Drainage Report (Appendix): 1. Public Works highly recommends that the design and related calculations be completed for the entire full build -out condition. As such, Lot 2 calculations should be included into the Appendix at this time (irrespective of when it will be constructed). Response: We only intend to prepare the design for Lot 1 at this time. 2. The volumes (storage requirements) for both the Minor and Major storm events shown on the Stage -Storage Sizing for Detention Basins is supposed to come from the sheet "Full -Spectrum." Need to include the UDFCD worksheet "Detention Volume by the Full Spectrum Method" in the Appendix to support the values provided. Response: This worksheet has been added to the report appendix. 3. Note on Table MD -3 that the maximum longitudinal slope for grass -lined swales is 0.20%>0.60% as mentioned in comment #6 above. Response: The previous reference to the UDFCD Major Drainage Channel standards does not apply to the swale proposed as this is not an UDFCD maintenance eligible conveyance. We utilized a common sense approach to the design and the owner will be responsible for maintenance. 4. Similar comment for the Channel Report; the proposed longitudinal slope on the west swale is far too steep to Pagel 8 Wheat Ridge_ResponseComments be approvable. Public Works recommends a pipe with drop manhole, but if an open channel is the chosen option then an armored channel with terracing shall be required. Response: The previous reference to the UDFCD Major Drainage Channel standards does not apply to the swale proposed as this is not an UDFCD maintenance eligible conveyance. We utilized a common sense approach to the design and the owner will be responsible for maintenance. Developed Drainage Plan: 1. While the "future phase storage" may not be built with this project, the drainage design for this property should account for the full build -out condition (so it only needs to be designed once). Public Works highly suggests that Lot 2 be included (in its 80% impervious) full build -out condition in the Final Drainage Study and called out as part of the "Future Phase". Response: We only intend to prepare the design for Lot 1 at this time. 2. Please note that the approvable grades for a grass -lined drainage swale is 0.20>0.60%%. If the proposed grade exceeds this maximum, then a different solution such as a pipe with drop manhole, concrete or armored channel with a drop structure or terracing shall be employed. And also note that the ultimate build -out runoff for Lot 2 needs to be incorporated into this design, even if certain components may not be constructed until Phase II, the design can be completed now. Response: See responses above. 3. Please be advised that no grading shall occur and no drainage facilities such as ponds, swales, channels, pipes, or any other stormwater conveyance, shall be constructed within two (2) feet of the property boundary. Response: Acknowledged 4. The sub -basin symbol in the Legend appears to be incomplete. Response: This sub -basin symbol includes all applicable information A=Basin Designation, B=Basin Area, C=5yr C Factor, D=100yr C Factor. Civil Construction Plans: 1. The runoff from Lot 1 is to be conveyed across Lot 2 to a detention/WQ facility also located on Lot 2. As such, Public Works highly recommends that the detention volume and the drainage in general for the ENTIRE site be accounted for in this design. For example, due to the steepness of the slope from Lot 1 to Lot 2 a pipe with drop (manhole) structure is in all likelihood going to be required anyway, so why not design for this and add a stub -out for Lot 2 at the MH so when Lot 2 is developed it's a simple tie-in to address the runoff from Phase 2? Also, if the existing pond is proposed to be re -graded anyway, why not also complete the grading to address Phase 2 drainage requirements at the same time? And even if your client decides to not do the field work with Phase 1, completing the design will still save him money (and time) in the long -run. Response: See responses above. 2. Any drainage swales such as the proposed westerly swale shall be located within a Drainage Easement. If the swale is not going to lie within the existing, platted easement then a separate Permanent Drainage Easement to the benefit of the City shall be required. Response: An easements exists as noted on the plans and conveyed by the underlying plat for Lots 1 and 2. 3. No grading for or any drainage conveyance or stormwater detention/WQ facilities shall be constructed within two (2) feet of any property boundary. Response: Acknowledged 4. Subsequent to discussions with the Community Development Department it sounds like the site design may be changing, so Public Works will hold off on any further technical comments until the next submittal. Response: We have worked out the site layout with Planning and Fire and have not made any changes to the building layout. It is our understanding that the above comments represent the entirety of the Engineering review for the project. Pagel 9 Wheat Ridge_ResponseComments Items of Note: 1. Stormwater Detention Easement: A"STORMWATER DETENTION EASEMENT" must be shown over the existing pond area if it is to be modified, or over the area of any additional detention pond area(s). The easement(s) will be created by separate document to the benefit of the City, and must include a signed & sealed Exhibit A to be submitted for review and approval. If the easement is needed, Public Works can provide a Permanent Easement template upon request. Response: A detention pond easement exists as noted on the plans and conveyed by the underlying plat. The Plat is included for reference. 2. CDPS Permit & Stormwater Management Plan: This site in general is greater than one acre in size and the area of disturbance will meet or exceed one (1) acre, so a Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) associated with the required State CDPS Permit shall be submitted to the City of Wheat Ridge for review and approval. The SWMP must be approved by the City prior to issuance of any Demolition, Grading, or Building Permits. The CDPS Permit is generally obtained from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment by the contractor at time of Building Permit Application. A copy of the CDPS must accompany the final submittal of the SWMP. Please contact Bill LaRow, Stormwater Program Manager at 303.235.2871 for further information). It is highly recommended that the SWMP be submitted as soon as possible to avoid delays in the issuance of required Permits. Response: Acknowledged 3. Drainage Certification/ Stormwater Maintenance Agreement and O & M Plan: Please note the following items required prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the Subdivision: a. Drainage Certification: A Drainage Certification Letter from the Engineer -of -Record stating that all drainage related items were constructed per the approved civil engineering documents. The Certification Letter shall be accompanied by As -Built plans in support of the statements made in the Letter as required by the Municipal Code of Laws. Response: Acknowledged b. Stormwater Maintenance Agreement and O & M Plan: All post -construction Best Management Practices (BMP's) for water quality must be maintained and inspected by the property owner(s) per Section 20-34 of the City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Code of Laws. For stormwater quality facilities including, but not limited to, above- ground or underground detention facilities, porous landscape detention areas, porous pavement, centrifuge type devices such as a Rinker Stormcepter®, hydrodynamic separation systems such as a Contech Vortechs®, or for any other approved post -construction BMP, a Stormwater Maintenance Agreement accompanied by an Operations and Maintenance (0 & M) Schedule/Log shall be required prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. The 0 & M Schedule/Log must be kept current and will be inspected on a regular basis by City staff to ensure compliance with City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Code requirements. Response: Acknowledged 4. Fees in Lieu of Construction: Since no Public Improvements currently exist along Parfet Street on either side of the subject property, fees in the amount of $7,983.38 will be taken in lieu of construction of the required Public Improvements along the 152.5' Parfet Street frontage. The fees will be due prior to issuance of any Building Permit. Response: Acknowledged 5. Right -of -Way Dedication: A 20' strip of Right -of -Way along the southerly portion of Lot 2 will be required with development of Lot 2. This is to allow for future construction of W. 50th Avenue to the west of Oak Street, and will provide better access to Lot 2. Response: Noted. Pagel 10 Wheat Ridge_ResponseComments For your approval please find 2 sets of plans and reports with all revisions noted above and additional information as requested. We look forward to your approval and appreciate your review of this application. Respectfully, Noah J. Nemmers Baseline Engineering Manager January 8, 2016 City of Wheat Ridge Public Works Engineering Division 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 RE: Parfet Mini Storage — Drive Width Variance Request To whom it may concern: SELINE Engineering - Planning - Surveying We are hereby requesting variance from the City's standard for aisle width of 22 feet for two-way traffic as noted in Table 10 of Section 26-501.E.11. This provision is reference to minimum parking space and drive aisle standards. This request is only applicable where there is no need for a fire lane. Where fire lanes are needed we have requested a variance of 24 feet from the fire department which is consistent with the IFC where aerial apparatus is not needed. We feel that this request is appropriate since this is not a parking lot situation and the storage units are not intended for vehicles and therefor we do not anticipate any vehicle conflicts beyond the occasional passing cars when storage units are being accessed. Granting this variance would not alter the essential character of the project. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located. This variance request has been prepared in conformance with the Wheat Ridge Criteria. We appreciate your consideration and please feel free to contact us with any questions. Sincerely, Baseli a Engineering Corporation fM i Noah J Nemmers PE Manager of Civil Engineering\ Golden GYZC�TZC�YID�ri 4<83Ing ` AdiW Ji#q/ iuucbjr ;3734 Sk 636k731r<99 Idf 636k73k<& K-1 k-Xd G-q&zqWIttII# :43 44k DIr2dVVAh438 Jili-&I/FYrn¢>gr ; 3%4 Sk <:3b861:933 Idf <:3b861934 lmtjh 74<Rd1UxW-c R EY f ::3485 vht_dnv�[ ;37:: 5k<:31;:c�;58 Id( ;99675"k439 e-------- FIRE LANE-------------------------------- --- I PROPOSED EMERGENCY - 2.76 ACCESS EASEMENT MAX HOSE LENGTH N=1,712,551.88 I 1312 r- S 89'49'15' E (325.01') E=3,106,810.60 I 7.7 11 P 11 _r_ 1 BUILDING F 1 65' 3,875 SF 20. 4 7 - 1 30. I 1 i I 1 / I I I I yy�� I I I 4- 3 BUILDING A BUILDING B BUILDING C `CY EL BUILDING D BUILDING E 3,600 SF 3200 SF 2,800 SF v / 2,400 SF 2400 SF z I L F N=1,712,432.76 N=1,712,431.89 \ E=3,106,531.11 E=3,106,810.77 w L -`--------i y/� to 26.8'- -- --FIR LANE ----�—�--�----�-,� -----L--------------- f - - ------------ -------------------- — - - <-- -S 89'45'15 W (275.007 - -- -- j 25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I wI----------------------- I �111 Eox �� b - -_-_-- 1 a II I I I I I I I GRAPHIC SCALE SITE PLAN 20 0 20 40 C4 C4 (IN FEET) 1 INCH = 20 FT 0 0 W Q I -a o w� � KKw N U wr H- N W < o O W a = F � M � F- W Li a Qr a 0 w 3 0 U NE' Z 39820 m �SS'UVAL .nw asnru 10/15/2W5 36' 9 Rif UA E SURVEY FIRM X%/X%/%% AB x0. C032M G14FMO IUYF 3208 -Civil vtlose 1.tlwg 4 v 12 C4 W z Z - � - g� a o Isom W _ o� �e DN PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT w LL nPROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT � o 0 m� EX. BUILDING TO BE REMOVED �- FIRE LANE PROPERTY BOUNDARY 8 RIGHT OF WAY LINE B x m z LOT UNE EASEMENT UNE EX. EDGE OF ASPHALT < o EX. CURB & GUTTER o PROPOSED 2' CURB & GUTTER m EX. WOOD FENCE 8 —� PROPOSED GATEel J FIREHOSE REACH ff 0 0 W Q I -a o w� � KKw N U wr H- N W < o O W a = F � M � F- W Li a Qr a 0 w 3 0 U NE' Z 39820 m �SS'UVAL .nw asnru 10/15/2W5 36' 9 Rif UA E SURVEY FIRM X%/X%/%% AB x0. C032M G14FMO IUYF 3208 -Civil vtlose 1.tlwg 4 v 12 C4 W- C - O G L O W iU �LL m a X i i X i X 3 X ' Z C r--• 2.63' f o r. - - - f - 127. -- b 6.84" GRADE BREAK � v! .�„ o PROPOSED ACCESS PROFILE 2.86° cn GRADE BREAK z c� a ir a CL GRAPHIC SCALE 0 a 20 0 20 40 0 U FEET) "'""'"°` (IN ll'17*� 1 INCH = 20 FT mz "in Ca3206 w� r� azar-LM a— Ldg s XX Meredith Reckert From: Meredith Reckert Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2016 9:32 AM To: Kevin Ferry Subject: Parfet Street storage Attachments: 3208- PARFET STREET SDP_010816.pdf Hi, Kevin We are continuing to work with the land owners of 5130 Parfet Street with their application for approval of mini - warehouses. They indicated that they have met with you (Arvada Fire) and were able to come to agreement on the width and location of the proposed fire lanes. Essentially, that fire lanes would run along the southern portion of the property in the main drive aisle from Parfet and north/south on the eastern portion of the property with an access easement to the north and that the rest of the drive aisles could be 20' in width. It has been indicated that the 20' wide lane is an "industry standard", although no back-up information was provided.. Our regulations require at least 22' of drive aisle width and are not going to support the variance. Attached is the revised site design. I'd like to know your thoughts. Meredith Meredith Reckert, AICP Senior Planner 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Office Phone: 303-235-2848 FAX: 303-235-2857 www.ci.wheatridse.co.us -' City of iemte Ccc�tiin�tinlIT�r Dt:vkor+�t1'�7 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail contains business -confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, electronic storage or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, attaching the original message, and delete the original message from your computer, and any network to which your computer is connected. Thank you. City of Wheat �e COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 9 City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29'' Ave. November 12, 2015 Noah Nemmers Baseline Corp 1950 Fort Street Golden, CO 80401 Dear Mr. Nemmers: Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 This letter is in regard to an application filed for approval of a Planned Building Group Plan for property located at 5130 Parfitt Street. The application has been reviewed and the following are comments regarding the first submittal. SHEET ONE 1. All sheet numbers in the document should be sheet of 2. Retitle the document as follows: "Parfitt Street Mini Storage Planned Building Group An Official Development Plan in the City of Wheat Ridge Located in the Southwest of Section 16, Range 69 West of the 6th PM City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado" All pages in the plan set should have the same title. 3. The border at the top of the page should be at least 1" in width per Jefferson County requirements. 4. Please provide a description of the project. Address proposed use, site layout, architecture, access into the site, etc. Also indicate that this development plan is for the northern lot only and that prior to any site development on the south, a site plan process will be required. 5. Add a case history box with the following case numbers: WZ-12-02, WZ-03-08, MS -02-07, WZ- 10-08, MS -10-04, WZ —14- 15, PBG -15-01 6. In the surveyors' certificate, designate who will be signing the document. 7. Add the following note: Fencing shall be consistent with Section 26-60 of the Wheat Ridge zoning and development code. 8. Add the following note: Landscaping shall be consistent with Section 26-502 of the Wheat Ridge zoning and development code. 9. Add the following note: Parking shall be consistent with Section 26-501 of the Wheat Ridge zoning and development code. 10. Add the following note: Site and building lighting shall be consistent with Section 26-503 of the Wheat Ridge zoning and development code. 11. Add the following note: Signage shall be consistent with Article VII of the Wheat Ridge zoning and development code. 12. Add the following note: The building and design standards will follow the Architectural and Site Design Manual. 13. Modify the Owner's signature to be a Declaration of Planned Building Group. 14. Modify the City Clerk and Mayor's signature line so they are separated. 15. Add a signature block for the Public Works Director 16. Add a signature block for the Planning Commission chairman. 17. In the Site Data Table, modify the zoning to be Industrial -Employment (I -E) 18. In the Site Data Table, delete the proposed use category as this can be included in the Character of the Development. 19. In the Site Data Table, indicate that this is for the northern lot only. 20. In the Site Data Table, make sure the combined coverages have the correct total - 53,086 square feet versus 53,158 as shown. 21. In the Site Data Table, remove the categories for Existing Gross Floor Area and Proposed Gross Floor Area. 22. In the Site Data Table, designate the allowed height as 35' and the proposed heights for both the office and the storage units. 23. In the Site Data Table, remove the category for Number of Residential Units unless the office structure will have an ancillary residence". Please address in the description of the project. 24. In the Site Data Table, insufficient parking is provided. 25. Please modify that the providing fire district is Arvada, not Wheat Ridge. SHEET TWO 1. The site plan does not meet the standards for interior drive width. At a minimum, the City's interior drive width should be 22' and may need to be wider to accommodate emergency vehicles. Typically 26' is required for a fire lane. 2. Insufficient parking is provided on this plan. Can additional spaces be striped on the eastern portion of the drive? 3. The separation between the rear of the office and building F needs to be increased. Perhaps if the parking area is flipped it will help. 4. Please clarify how the thin connection between buildings F and G will be used. 5. Correct the spelling of "storage". 6. Please lengthen the stacking distance at the entrance gate. 7. How will trash pick-up be handled? Please address as a note and show location with screening. S. Correct the street name. 9. Correct the name of the planned development to the north. 10. On Lot 2, specify that a separate site plan review will be necessary prior to development of Lot 2. SHEET THREE 1. The site plan does not meet the standards for interior drive width. At a minimum, the City's interior drive width should be 22' and may need to be wider to accommodate emergency vehicles. Typically 26' is required for a fire lane. 2. Insufficient parking is provided on this plan. Can additional spaces be striped on the eastern portion of the drive? 3. The separation between the rear of the office and building F needs to be increased. Perhaps if the parking area is flipped it will help. 4. Please clarify how the thin connection between buildings F and G will be used. 5. Correct the spelling of "storage". 6. Please lengthen the stacking distance at the gate. 7. Correct the street name. 8. Correct the name of the planned development to the north. 9. On Lot 2, specify that a separate site plan review will be necessary prior to development of Lot 2. 10. Add the following note: All landscaped areas shall be served by a zoned, automatic irrigation system. 11. Expand the landscape information to address living versus non -living coverage. 12. Designate ground cover. 13. Add the following note: Individual tree and shrub species will be established by a landscape plan and approved by staff during the building permit review process. SHEET FOUR 1. The building architecture included on sheets 4 — 12 is inconsistent with the Heavy Commercial/Industrial design standards specified in the Architectural and Site Design Manual. That would include fagade design, materials, transparency and screening. This is especially true for the western fagade of the western -most structure. Staff also requested that the northern and southern facades of building A and the southern facades of Buildings B, C and D have treatment as well. 2. For the ease of the reader, could sheets 4 — 12 be reduced down to showing typicals, thus eliminating several pages of the plan set. PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 1. Renumber this sheet so it is consistent with the numbering system on the rest of the sheets 2. If any freestanding light fixtures are proposed, please include details. OTHER 1. For publication purposes, please email a boundary legal description in Word fonnat to mreckert@,ci.wheatridge.co.us. Attached are referrals received from other city departments and outside agencies regarding the planned building group. Arvada Fire Protection District. See attached letter from Kevin Ferry dated November 4, 2015. Valley Water District: See attached letter from Kathleen Kadnuck dated October 26, 2015. Wheat Ridge Economic Development: See attached email from Steve Art dated October 22, 2015. Wheat Ridge Public Works. See attached letter from Dave Brossman dated November 2, 2015. Xcel Energy: See attached letter from Donna George dated November 5, 2015. Additional referral comments may be forthcoming and will be forwarded. This concludes the summary of comments. Please address each of these comments by revising the drawings accordingly. For clarification on any of these issues, please feel free to contact any of the Development Review committee members: Community Development Meredith Reckert 303-235-2848 Public Works Dave Brossman 303-235-2864 Traffic Engineering Mark Westberg 303-235-2863 Once the changes have been made, please submit two copies of the planned building group plan, and one copy of the technical documents with electronic copies for all. If you have any questions or need further clarification, do not hesitate to contact me at 303-235-2848. Sincerely, Meredith Reckert, AICP Senior Planner rt Rev. 5/2014 Planned Building Group Required Cover Sheet Items DECLARATION OF PLANNED BUILDING GROUP WHEREAS, (Insert name of all applicant(s) and owner(s)) have submitted a planned building group Plan for the City of Wheat Ridge's approval pursuant to Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, for the land area legally described as: (Insert legal description of entire land area to be covered by the planned building group); and WHEREAS, the City of Wheat Ridge has approved said plan on —/—/— (Insert date of approval) NOW, THEREFORE, upon final approval of the planned building group by the City of Wheat Ridge, this declaration is notice to prospective purchasers of the land area and to all others that it is the subject of a planned building group and that said plan and the ordinances relating thereto are binding on subsequent purchasers, successors and assigns unless the plan is abandoned, amended or withdrawn in writing and duly recorded and shall limit the construction, use and operation of all land and structures included within such plans to all conditions and limitations set forth in such plans and ordinances. Owner State of Colorado ) ) SS County of Jefferson ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Day of , A.D. 20 Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public CITY CERTIFICATION Approved this day of by the City of Wheat Ridge. ATTEST City Clerk Mayor Community Development Director Director of Public Works by COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDERS CERTIFICATE State of Colorado ) ) SS County of Jefferson ) I hereby certify that this plat was filed in the office of the County Clerk and Recorder of Jefferson County at Golden, Colorado, at O'Clock_. M. on the day of A. D., in Book , Page , Reception No. JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER By: Deputy (Add Planning Commission Certification only if PBG is reviewed at public hearing.) PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION Approved this day of by the Wheat Ridge Planning Commission. Chairperson Community Development Department - (303) 235-2846 - www.ci.wheatridge.co.us Wks W"pl"�N3J.U9. �r� 3NI13SVQ -- —_— -_ -_. U38IS ilWd Of IS --�_ - – – –30V801S INIW 133&S 1338Vd I.1 Nf �J NOSN3JJ3f �.wn 1v.fva� 3901" 1V3W 3lY" AB M1➢IYdLId XOYB6fl" W6Y�➢1 am ROV110 VV ja"vd y� i i Ma Ma 9 G gg $ u g$ E g Ogg �L s ®ei 1 o= � Lb 'gg XX 1p s6 xl �gS� 13 —Y C7C7C7 9 � I ap 3 s elpro 7E3 : a W Z Y W oV s Gi yty� E y� i i Ma Ma 31 �L s ss xro is -d 1 o= � Lb 'gg XX 1p s6 xl �gS� 13 —Y 08 � I ap 3 s elpro y� i i Ma Ma 31 §$tp $ s d Lb 'gg XX 1p s6 xl �gS� ag$ g '2 �8.ga 08 c -A ap 3 s elpro 7E3 : a oV —=. s� I . �o�o�o�.wo,o�uaow.,._smm� , LO--S.I!—W .O -P -*3 _.-__ 3NI13Sb NrN — ---- M. __ —. _. ____ xxx =,_=,_o ti; -- u nra .e asndau --__ - __ _ = u���.,oub xouartcmo xosM� Wld 11S 133NL5 133NYd OClS 30V801S INIW 133aLS 13J8Vd UNOOO NOStl3i3f 3O0RI 1tl3NN 30 UIJ � n gnvaws iaaxva �sF-°a geg g re �F�,eRs ••'+• �� � oo ^,ybo ,�...... Q a QE g4 e �E , � n b g0.1 II Y �i b \ 'aAV Pi£Z •b ......,: -aa� .t . . - mremnUDJNVIwI39llsaroiosa uNrcmu Ntlld 3dtlO50MUS DAM MIS NV1 "s BuJa:mS. Bunumy.OulrouMg rv8H "_ - - R aa F xxx 30V801S INIW 13361S 13AHVd 9� W m B9 , AIN IOJ N0sa31111 3'9018 jv3H 90 A119 U 3NI13SV -- - _ xxx sloz-sl-ol n,� --- runersxwlrur3w:.�uu .71'1 $DYNOZS Z9d7IVd nw xe o�ndMla :audecsaa xoaMsl !!Fd!llala! a! 11!,1;!11"IlIg'Melia hIg!e $IH, IiIIpglI @i@3ia3�3�l�9@3 �a@ �:�a�s@ �3�@3 Ilk 10 ------------------------ g a` _. -------- 3211 R J\\ 1 \ \ \ 1 g I 1 1 UAOX :09)Aff 9 RAV Pla 'm I 0 � �11 I III 1 IIII R \ I 1 1 UAOX :09)Aff RAV Pla 'm 0 R awe oaapm Nmwte3us oeoi asv Euwxn0u3 3NI13Sd8& NfN .. � _- -- waN " xxx nvo - — - -- - Ae annawd - --- — — — xouerom Nosvax A1NN07 NOSN3333f SNOLLVA3l3V 9NI011(IB 13M" L3Md acts 39V2101S INIW 133211S 13d21tld 3008 IV]. i0 All] J'1'I HflVNO.iS .LHdiltld }q° do �y J2 Pp �- p Eli ti Q � m O U O K O N O m O � O O O W I O O > > H w F Z w a a a H � o vE"i wj A � z Q o a �o 3 O a 0 i Z Q N � O � O O U (7 0 � m -- ommow .mm-, Ewlwms.Oquugd.EuwwiOu3 NII __ SNOUVA313 8 ONION 133ILLS UAFVd OLIS ggpp NwaN NNOJ NOSa3JJ3f 30V801S INIW AMS 13JdVd 3001 1N3HM 0 All �jfoyg� .7I'I gflYilfl7$ ,I.gddilVd 3 NIl3S`d8� xxx % aO �g g nra ae aanma xoumnsao NO6Y3tl 5e ffi v O O z F w w G z r~W W w z Q w [-4mmmas �o z a p�q a z� 00 � 00 O U ,.d �m . �mns mai osu Nr®e SNOLLtlA313 3 9NIQ11119 v Ek F 133tlLS 1391tld 0[lS go �! �s qd 3 YwaH 39V801S INIW 13381S 13AHVd � � r �s ;9' F s M _ _ uNnoo Nosa�+i3r 3oein iv3r+m io ul� 4 BG�ui1 y9 p!r? i' 3 N I l3 Sd xx �� AB 6b dLW xoumuflo wsvn �7T H�vxOiS LHeRItld @ E ! Ba C 11` �o 00 I Iz) O I Q P O mo F w Z w a F A w I wroe oowJw�Nttm taus mroi osc OuJwq.Aerugd EuromEu3 3NIl3Sd NfN as xx - -_ -- �.o ��, N� UNf10J NOSN3JJ3f SNONtlS313 d 1 133tlt5 133NYd OCal9 1OV801S INIW AMTS 13J8Vd 3701a 1tl3HM 30 UIJ 3111 aoexws Jazmd > db E i' rW V � I - 0 w 0-4 wo o ¢ a E- W z ia rin w ., wQ o W a VI 3 ~ ti 0 A W A A N � a o� .,.d wnum N3nYi uaus mroiasu kU—s e�!-*3 NON ®' - - SO 13 3 9N%L9 I33aUS <s 03M %L9 k--w way 39VWiS INIIV 1332US 133NVd UNOOJ NOS83333O 39018 1V3NM 30 A11J 3NI13Sd8& i w zz o o CA a o W W w E- �D oQ W v� N o z o 3o z [� A A A W a w � a � N a 00 � U d N3vm i s Nf N _ YwaN - - - - — - - SNOLLVA313 i ONIQllf19 133ULS UMVd OW s ISM °�Id !a3 3NIl3Sd8� XXx — --- - 30VilO1S INIW AMS 13d21Vd Al NIIOJ NOSa3ii3" mala 1tl3HAllo ip Al �`kpif xn aflvxoas iadwa P Mill �.o Aa ��. NOYm6fl0 us�3u z N O Q K U O d' O - O m O U U O 4 p O m � U U � O U d x w � a x 0-4 w w z o W w W W �o W A w <� O � C7 W a I U H Q Z U ti Q -. -. IMI MOSI:d03 iiva-�pplyl c � LEOOX OJ'3001N 1V-0iM 'f1�J.JifONd 1•/�1 ♦• Po i\rJ m"Molm® 193tJdI OLIS -I-ZZ-Cfl 3L\(1 '0.�13d115 a3lq0d J99 XH9dWOJ - NI —1Ell HD6'2101519di1Nd 30tlN01.S _ JIaJ-11.1m ':ruunaus 4� Z 40 w� s,. DI, ws .- ww m Nvw . u3ws NON -. NYId 3)tlNltltl0 G 14- 133NLS 13Md OUS NO -S S-Wmd - I -W -15q. u -H - _ 39VNOlS INIW 133NIS 13JNVd _ A;r.; rvOSN3i330 3`901N 1V34 30 A110 3 N I l 3 S b xx nro a aonawa n w n°sxs 0111 HMW= 13aw.1 -= - - -=-- ------------- X61 tl a -max r` �p1 ' 1` FI`� i � V � m , �x•p �,__- �-_�- =-b- ' p � ' � , ,� V I. � _r� � I I III I � I I Ij�y 1 �6 1 I 11 a � •� u it I (box •{V7) 1 1' �(/1 t I PI£Z 'b i �.do Fived Dim"At 7903 Allison Wav Arvada CO 80005 • 303-424-3012 • 303-432-7995 fax November 4, 2015 Ms. Meredith Reckert, Planner City of Wheat Ridge 7500 W 291h Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Re: Parfet Self -Storage, COWR Project #PBG -15-01, AFPD Project # 15-337D Ms. Reckert: The referral referenced above was reviewed for compliance with the 2012 International Fire Code (IFC) as adopted by the City of Wheat Ridge. The Fire District has the following comments regarding this development plan. 1. Fire protection service This parcel is currently within the jurisdictional boundaries of the Arvada Fire Protection District (AFPD). The fire protection services for this parcel are provided primarily by AFPD Fire Station 42 located at 5250 Oak Street. 2. Cover sheet The cover sheet of the plans indicates that the Wheat Ridge Fire Protection District is the fire protection district. This parcel is serviced by the Arvada Fire Protection District (AFPD). The coversheet shall be corrected to correctly indicate the AFPD. 3. Street name The plans indicate Parfet Street as "W 23`d Avenue and needs correction. 4. Clarifications requested The following clarifications are requested: • What is the purpose and use of the area located between buildings C & D? • What is the building configuration between the East and West halves of Building F? 5. Fire apparatus access -surface Fire apparatus access roads shall be provided with an approved all-weather surface (concrete or asphalt). Access roads shall be capable of supporting an imposed load of 85,000 pounds. (2012 IFC Sections 502.3 & D102.1 amended) 6. Fire apparatus access width A minimum unobstructed width of 26-0 feet is required for fire apparatus access roads. Compliance with this provision is indicated on the plan. (2012 IFC Section 503.2.1 amended) For this site plan in particular the following access drives will need to meet this provision: • The drive between buildings A&B • The drive between buildings B/C & F • The drive between buildings D/E & F • The drive that extends on the south side of the site • The drive that extends on the east side of the site 7. Fire apparatus access -turning radius Fire apparatus access roads shall provide a minimum inside turning radius of 26-0 feet and an outside turning radius of at least 47-0 feet. An Autoturn analysis of the access drives identified under comment #3 shall be provided and indicate that access on these drives will accommodate fire apparatus as specified by Arvada Fire. (2012 IFC Section 503.2.4) 8. Emergency access through site Fire apparatus access lanes through the site shall be dedicated as "Emergency Access Lanes" or other similar language as directed by the City of Wheat Ridge. (2009 IFC Section 503.1) 9. Water supply for fire -protection There are existing fire hydrants in the area of this parcel that will satisfy proximity requirements for this parcel and proposed development (2012 IFC Sections 507.5.1 and 903.7.1 amended) 10. Required fire -flow Based upon an estimated building size of 3,875 square -feet and Type V -B construction the required fire -flow for this site is a minimum of 1,750 gallons per minute (gpm). This figure may be reduced if Type II -B construction is used for the building. (2012 IFC Table B105.1) 11. Access during construction Approved fire apparatus access shall be provided during construction to within 150-0 feet of all points of the perimeter walls. Unless otherwise approved fire apparatus access consisting of the first -lift of asphalt or concrete shall be provided prior to commencing construction above grade. (2012 IFC Sections 501.4) 12. Landscaping clearance A 3-0 foot clear space shall be maintained around all fire hydrants. The space shall be measured from the top center of the hydrant and there shall be no obstructions directly in front of fire hydrants. (2012 IFC Section 507.5.5) 13. Construction plans Complete building construction plans shall be submitted directly to the Fire District (AFPD) for review and approval at the same time plans are submitted to the City Wheat Ridge and prior to construction occurring. The developer is encouraged to contact the AFPD Community Risk Reduction Division to verify plan submittal requirements and Fire District permit fees prior to plans submittal. Please contact me at (720) 398-0297 or via e-mail at kevin.ferry@arvadafire.com if you should have any questions or need further information. Sincerely, K Vv'�Ferro /Si Kevin Ferry Fire Marshal W26/15 MON 08:22 FAX 303 424 0628 VALLEY {PATER DIS 10001 VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 12101 wFs'r 52ND AVENUE W I I HAT R I DC, E, COLORADO 80033 TELEFIAL.AE 303-424-9661 F, -%x 303424-082%9 October 26, 2015 Meredith Rec:kert City of Wheat Ridge Conunut}ity Development Y)epartmcnt 7500 W. 29'x' Ave, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Dear Meredith: In response to your inquiry regarding Case No. P13ta-15-01, Aari`et Swrage, we offer the following comments: I, The District has no issue with the proposed development and has water availablc to serve the proposed development. 2. Due to grade issues, the District will need to review a detailed development plan prior to snaking a final determination on water availability at various locations within the site. The developer has previously contacted the District and will need to continue to com1litrnicate with us to assure that the locations of the buildings allow access to water mainlines. Please feel trice to contact me with any further questions. Sine iy, Kat a nuc, District Office Manager Meredith Reckert From: Steve Art Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 2:27 PM To: Meredith Reckert Subject: RE: Referral - Parfet Storage The economic development division believes this is a good use of the property in question. But, the elevations on the buildings with frontage and visibility to Parfet need to be more aesthetically eye appealing. A professional architect should be put under contract to improve the look of all the structures. The drive aisles appear to very slim for large vehicles. The access gate appears to provide enough room for only one vehicle. We know, all too often more than one vehicle uses an entrance for this type of use. Steve Art Economic Development & Urban Renewal Manager Direct: 303-235-2806 Cell: 720-454-9040 City �F VVhx ►ry tvtANAGWS S�rtt�t gc� From: Meredith Reckert Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 2:14 PM To: Steve Art <sart@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: Referral - Parfet Storage Dear Steve, The Wheat Ridge Community Development Department has received a request for approval of planned building group at 5130 Parfet Street (Case No. PBG -15-01). Please download the application documents from the City drive: Folder: V:\Community Development\ Land Use Case Referral File name: PBG-15-01/Parfet Storage Comments are due by November 5, 2015; no response from you will constitute having no objections or concerns. Feel free to be in touch with any additional questions. Thank you, Meredith Reckert, AICP Senior Planner 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Office Phone: 303-235-2848 Fax: 303-234-2857 www.ci.wheatridge.co.us XceiEnergysm PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY November 5, 2015 City of Wheat Ridge Community Development 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Attn: Meredith Reckert Re: Parfet Storage, Case # PBG -15-01 Right of Way & Permits 1123 West 3`d Avenue Denver, Colorado 80223 Telephone: 303.571.3306 Facsimile: 303. 571.3284 donna.I.george@xcelenergy.com Public Service Company of Colorado's (PSCo) Right of Way & Permits Department Referral Desk has reviewed the site development plans for Parfet Storage. Please be aware PSCo owns and operates existing underground electric distribution facilities running easterly from the pole in the West 23rd Avenue right-of-way into Lot 1. As a safety precaution, PSCo would like to remind the developer to call the Utility Notification Center, at 1-800-922-1987 to have all utilities located prior to any construction. The property owner/developer/contractor must contact the Builder's Call Line at 1-800- 628-2121 and complete the application process for any new gas or electric service, or modification to existing facilities including relocation and/or removal. It is then the responsibility of the developer to contact the Designer assigned to the project for approval of design details. Additional easements may need to be acquired by separate document for new facilities. Please note the contact information for Xcel Energy/Electric (and Natural Gas) on the site plan cover sheet should be changed to read "Builder's Call Line, 1-800-628-2121 ". Should you have any questions with this referral response, please contact me at 303-571- 3306. Donna George Contract Right of Way Referral Processor Public Service Company of Colorado City of _:��W heat �idge PUBLIC WORKS City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 291h Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2861 F: 303.235.2857 November 2, 2015 Mr. Noah J. Nemmers, P.E. Jehn Engineering 1950 Ford Street Golden, CO 80401 303.940.9966 Re: First Review Comments of the Final Drainage Report & Plan, Site Development Plan, and Civil Construction Plans for the proposed mini -warehouse buildings, Case# PBG-15-01/Parfet Storage. Dear Mr. Nemmers, I have completed the first review of the above referenced documents received on October 22, 2015, for the proposed Planned Building Group at the property located at 5130 Parfet Street, and I have the following comments: PLANNING & ZONING: Site Development Plan: 1. "W. 23`d Ave." needs to be changed to "Parfet Street" (on ALL plans and sheets). 2. It appears the proposed fence shown on the Landscape Plan lies outside of the subject property boundary. If the owner of the subject property wishes to construct a 6' high fence within this area, said owner shall construct the fence within the bounds of the subject property or obtain an easement to construct and maintain a fence from the adjoining land owner. 3. Per the plan view on the Landscape Plan, the existing curb & gutter on the entrance drive appears to have been constructed outside of the subject property and built on the adjoining property to the south. If this is indeed the case, prior to City approval of the current proposal either one of the following two must occur: a. The existing curb & gutter shall be removed and reconstructed within the subject property boundary, OR b. An easement to allow for the future maintenance and reconstruction of the existing curb & gutter shall be obtained from the property owner(s) to the south and a copy of the recorded easement provided to the City. 4. Please be advised that no grading shall occur and no drainage facilities such as ponds, swales, channels, pipes, or any other stormwater conveyance, shall be constructed within two (2) feet of the property boundary. As such, the proposed swale on the west side of the driveway to Lot 2 will need to be revised so the grading for the swale is at least two (2) feet from the property line. (The swale will need to be redesigned anyway as the slope is far too steep — refer to comment #6 under the FDR discussion below). 5. Subsequent to discussions with the Community Development Department it appears the design may be changing, so Public Works will hold off on any substantive comments until the next submittal. www.ci.w heatridge.co. u s Public Works Engineering November 2, 2015 Page 2 CIVIL ENGINEERING: Final Drainage Report (Discussion): I . GENERAL COMMENT: Please use complete sentences in the Discussion portion of the Report rather just than copying text from the City -standard outline. 2. Include a description of the additional modifications needed to allow for the completion of the full build -out condition to complete Phase 2 (accounting for the stated 80% imperviousness on Lot 2). 3. Under Section 3 B., Runoff: a. The runoff from Lot l is to be conveyed across Lot 2 to a detention/WQ facility also located on Lot 2. As such, Public Works highly recommends that the detention volume and the drainage in general for the ENTIRE site be accounted for in this design (including Lot 2). It is obvious that the owner knows what he is going to build (80% impervious), so there's no reason not to design for this now. Therefore, the runoff calculations should include sub -basin information for Lot 2. b. The proposed Swale exceeds the maximum allowable slope of 6%; an alternative conveyance such as a pipe w/drop MH structure is more appropriate. 4. Need to discuss the proposed underdrain system, including what quantity of ground water is anticipated and where this is to be discharged (e.g., if it is to be discharged into the detention facility this volume shall be accounted for in the basin sizing). 5. Under Section 3 C., Detention : a. Remove the first paragraph regarding proximity to a major drainageway as this does not apply to this project. b. It is stated in sub -section 4 that the Excess Urban Runoff Volume (EURV) method of the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD) will be the design employed, which is great and actually encouraged by the City. However, it is also stated the existing outlet structure is going to remain, which cannot happen without the structure being modified. c. Sub -section 5 needs to be revised. Please note that the EURV design uses a two-stage outlet structure rather than the multi -stage of the standard EDB/WQCV design, so a statement that the existing structure shall be reconstructed to be a 2 -stage system (EURV & 100 -yr) rather that the multi -stage design of the WQCV, 5 -yr, 100 -yr system is needed. d. Sub -section 6 & 7 states that "a concrete trickle channel will not be employed." Public Works highly recommends the use of a 2' wide concrete trickle channel be employed in all EDB's to ensure long-term functionality of the basin. What we have found is that over time the basin bottom will tend to become irregular and not fully drain, which leads to creation of a shallow -water mosquito habitat. In addition, if no channel is used and the pond does become a nuisance, the property owner will be required to mitigate the mosquito problem on a continual basis. 6. Under section E it is stated that the grass Swale complies with the UDFCD criteria, which not the case. While it may be true that the velocity is under the 5 ft./sec maximum per Urban Drainage, they also require the longitudinal slope be between 0.20%<0.60%, (as found in the referenced Table MD -3). Since he proposed slope for this channel exceeds 8%, Public Works suggests that a www.d.wheatridge.coms 5130 Parfet St—Parfet Street Storage - Review-I.Itr.docx Public Works Engineering November 2, 2015 Page 3 pipe with drop manhole be employed and that the open channel design be either abandoned or include armoring and terracing. 7. In Section 7 it is stated that "no new storm sewer has been prepared..." Please refer to the above comment # 6. 8. In the Conclusions it is stated that "the proposed drainage design has been prepared for the initial phase of the storage warehouse use proposed on Lot 1." Please refer to comment 3a above. Final Drainage Report (Appendix): I . Public Works highly recommends that the design and related calculations be completed for the entire full build -out condition. As such, Lot 2 calculations should be included into the Appendix at this time (irrespective of when it will be constructed). 2. The volumes (storage requirements) for both the Minor and Major storm events shown on the Stage -Storage Sizing for Detention Basins is supposed to come from the sheet "Full -Spectrum." Need to include the UDFCD worksheet "Detention Volume by the Full Spectrum Method' in the Appendix to support the values provided. 3. Note on Table MD -3 that the maximum longitudinal slope for grass -lined swales is 0.20%>0.60% as mentioned in comment #6 above. 4. Similar comment for the Channel Report; the proposed longitudinal slope on the west Swale is far too steep to be approvable. Public Works recommends a pipe with drop manhole, but if an open channel is the chosen option then an armored channel with terracing shall be required. Developed Drainage Plan: 1. While the "future phase storage" may not be built with this project, the drainage design for this property should account for the full build -out condition (so it only needs to be designed once). Public Works highly suggests that Lot 2 be included (in its 80% impervious) full build -out condition in the Final Drainage Study and called out as part of the "Future Phase". 2. Please note that the approvable grades for a grass -lined drainage Swale is 0.20>0.60%%. If the proposed grade exceeds this maximum, then a different solution such as a pipe with drop manhole, concrete or armored channel with a drop structure or terracing shall be employed. And also note that the ultimate build -out runoff for Lot 2 needs to be incorporated into this design, even if certain components may not be constructed until Phase II, the design can be completed now. 3. Please be advised that no grading shall occur and no drainage facilities such as ponds, swales, channels, pipes, or any other stormwater conveyance, shall be constructed within two (2) feet of the property boundary. 4. The sub -basin symbol in the Legend appears to be incomplete. Civil Construction Plans: 1. The runoff from Lot 1 is to be conveyed across Lot 2 to a detention/WQ facility also located on Lot 2. As such, Public Works highly recommends that the detention volume and the drainage in general for the ENTIRE site be accounted for in this design. For example, due to the steepness of the slope from Lot 1 to Lot 2 a pipe with drop (manhole) structure is in all likelihood going to be required anyway, so why not design for this and add a stub -out for Lot 2 at the MH so when Lot 2 is developed it's a simple tie-in to address the runoff from Phase 2? Also, if the existing pond is www.c6% heatridge.coms 5130 Parfet St_Parfet Street Storage - Review-l.ltr.docx Public Works Engineering November 2, 2015 Page 4 proposed to be re -graded anyway, why not also complete the grading to address Phase 2 drainage requirements at the same time? And even if your client decides to not do the field work with Phase 1, completing the design will still save him money (and time) in the long -run. 2. Any drainage swales such as the proposed westerly Swale shall be located within a Drainage Easement. If the swale is not going to lie within the existing, platted easement then a separate Permanent Drainage Easement to the benefit of the City shall be required. 3. No grading for or any drainage conveyance or stormwater detention/WQ facilities shall be constructed within two (2) feet of any property boundary. 4. Subsequent to discussions with the Community Development Department it sounds like the site design may be changing, so Public Works will hold off on any further technical comments until the next submittal. ITEMS OF NOTE: Stormwater Detention Easement: A"STORMWATER DETENTION EASEMENT" must be shown over the existing pond area if it is to be modified, or over the area of any additional detention pond area(s). The easement(s) will be created by separate document to the benefit of the City, and must include a signed & sealed Exhibit A to be submitted for review and approval. If the easement is needed, Public Works can provide a Permanent Easement template upon request. 2. CDPS Permit & Stormwater Management Plan: This site in general is greater than one acre in size and the area of disturbance will meet or exceed one (1) acre, so a Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) associated with the required State CDPS Permit shall be submitted to the City of Wheat Ridge for review and approval. The SWMP must be approved by the City prior to issuance of any Demolition, Grading, or Building Permits. The CDPS Permit is generally obtained from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment by the contractor at time of Building Permit Application. A copy of the CDPS must accompany the final submittal of the SWMP. Please contact Bill LaRow, Stormwater Program Manager at 303.235.2871 for further information). It is highly recommended that the SWMP be submitted as soon as possible to avoid delays in the issuance of required Permits. 3. Drainage Certification/ Stormwater Maintenance Agreement and O & M Plan: Please note the following items required prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the Subdivision: a. Drainage Certification: A Drainage Certification Letter from the Engineer -of -Record stating that all drainage related items were constructed per the approved civil engineering documents. The Certification Letter shall be accompanied by As -Built plans in support of the statements made in the Letter as required by the Municipal Code of Laws. b. Stormwater Maintenance Agreement and O & M Plan: All post -construction Best Management Practices (BMP's) for water quality must be maintained and inspected by the property owner(s) per Section 20-34 of the City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Code of Laws. For stormwater quality facilities including, but not limited to, above -ground or underground detention facilities, porous landscape detention areas, porous pavement, centrifuge type devices such as a Rinker Stormcepter®, www.ci.wh eatridge.com s 5130 Parfet St_Parfet Street Storage - Review-I.Itr.doex Public Works Engineering November 2, 2015 Page 5 hydrodynamic separation systems such as a Contech Vortechs®, or for any other approved post - construction BMP, a Stormwater Maintenance Agreement accompanied by an Operations and Maintenance (O & M) Schedule/Log shall be required prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. The O & M Schedule/Log must be kept current and will be inspected on a regular basis by City staff to ensure compliance with City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Code requirements. 4. Fees in Lieu of Construction: Since no Public Improvements currently exist along Parfet Street on either side of the subject property, fees in the amount of $7,983.38 will be taken in lieu of construction of the required Public Improvements along the 152.5' Parfet Street frontage. The fees will be due prior to issuance of any Building Permit. 5. Right -of -Way Dedication: A 20' strip of Right -of -Way along the southerly portion of Lot 2 will be required with development of Lot 2. This is to allow for future construction of W. 50th Avenue to the west of Oak Street, and will provide better access to Lot 2. The above comments are as of the date reviewed and may not reflect all comments from other departments or reviewing agencies. If you have any questions, please contact me at 303.235.2864. Regards, David F. Brossman, P.L.S. Development Review Engineer/ City Surveyor CC: Steve Nguyen, Engineering Manager Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner File wwwA.wheatridge.co.us 5130 Parfet St_Parfet Street Storage - Review-Lltr.doex Iola aaswm xs m'�isw' Ou�AsunS.Ouryuo' Yx.N� _— — MULS AJWd OCls 3�V201S INIW 1332llS 1332tld�.EunwulEu3 N�a No=a3,3 3�aa d3 oA xxx aovs� g� Eta `13N133Sbs u " �' F� - e g a W ? ITb dU ��as8 y � aaa�7 y ctl�E0gG8G`cc� 9 MI —=M rum--ims ZI% Nf� N"N0LLnorea �– 13381S L'UWd OSIS ___ 39VMo1S INIW 1332115 13j21Vd g , 3 N I l 3 SVG& ui NON NOSN3 Jif 901 1V3 M JO AllJ xxx smz-si-a� nuuers rsawr�x m ua 3lva ae aandwa xoudoosm Nosx�d 77'I flflYllO,iS ,1fld:IYd a 2 6 e zu Be W W wd W zi W W a t;� o oo I r �q hal r (/L6iZ) 3 ,SY,fLee S ,N � sd 5 g� (,00LLi) M ,SttLW N � � a LJ AA - eek t s R C o t 36 n� LAY (pSZSI)M,S1,ILWN V 1 LW—f (moll 109) \i, wwa ooaov� Nttm L 101 - NYId ONIOtltl0 as 1337 d Bfl9 Ie BO—S. o.m.id. auu-13 _ Yrva -_._ "i m in c 3�V2JOlS INIW 1332llS 13321Vd 3NIl3Sb� N000 NOSN3 d3P 001a 1tl3W d0 A117 xxx S10�Y8 �,� xolla a'1'I HflVYO,i,S ZHdHVd F 'O ---- - - -- -- - ''iii %�i liw I I r v 1 1 1 I i �• 1_ _---__-- I r - _ \ 1 y f a, •a' III, _.�plk """ , �v fi=r �� � '1 I I qa A F a 3 rd+ �'� f f ee Z 6�QY� s � �!R�. i�II \1 4 � I P\ $$$ZZZ I ilii I p. _i L- - - - - M ,ri,Y40a N— ULOQ \ '3AV Pi£Z 'AA I I Z 6�QY� s m«W ' csttorsm['i ' 'o wsm[u NfN Z 101 — NVId ON080 133HLS 333Ntld MIS �e �`�''o s�'� ep�`�a¢gE� :.* A i n nvmu.S.euowW mwwl�3 _ rvaH — — 30V801S ININ 133d S 13J8Vd �� � � �ge AWOO NOSa3 3f Old 1V3 M JO All] xx�-. sloe-sl-ol Iwr3tix �o uo 4 �'"•°:�� nra ;.e �n _.. ul Ngldep51O wsvnl .iZZ $flYYO�LS SHtIiIYd p 8 — Oil III 2�cT€g- e8 y5 — __ i1 �'889��.=55`m 143 t------ ---_ ' --_ —_---(.tt9zz)M.SI.+ry.W S( --I — 13 -- — r k --r , -= - _-- _ F v ---- ----- . 1 / OOsz) M sI.SY.BB 1 ( —�— i e _ - \ —6J _ _� — —_ _L_3 _ s _a•' _ _ �� — _ � R 17 asc, a WN - --_. i ncceorcnc 1331LL513NVd OE IS Lp..m 39tl2101S INIW 133N1S 13321tld 3 N I l 3 SdB� .Nf m uN 0J N05 3 j3f 7n gflVIOU �Yd 3�OItl 1tl3HM JO lll f g 9 7: tlG e$ I LU f �i�g§$�a Lma' d�sd ��8 i"� p. •y��� fJ ����. �y���$ iM �•gg��, q� �1 $ v% R o b F F s -fig- F e 1I 6 WIN IW 3a �U --- WN NVId aLtS ' '"' 3w' 3 N11Is v 39VUOiS INIM 133HIS 13A8Vd NOSd3AA3P 3DcId IUM �D un U_ m NOVIOIS JLELawd 12; 6 ISIF 6 (JL'6a) 3 W.*LOO S ----------- A S*.*L00 N 1 0II0 ...... .. .... --- (JL'6a) 3 W.*LOO S ----------- A S*.*L00 N ...... .. .... s. -M IF LI as 91) A StA00 N (MON 109) my PIEZ A nwe oamAv�N;.isnus Rroi oSsr NfN Pm —S. Nwoo,d .Puuaevi8u3 _ u -H 3NI13Sd8& sra�,��` AMOW/d3Pd N'nd 3dtl]SIIWI F zEo b N'x aag 133L1S 131Wd MW Pa Vie; ��.eas •: gi n 13381S 13J8Vd - llNf10J NOSL'3333f 39VaoiS INIW 3'JOlil 1tl3WA JO AlIJ u Riga g�� -- a I ------ --i ah Ji \ 1 - - ` 1 \ \ 1 I I I 1 EE I I 1 3 E \ I . II I I If 3 r8 i L.. ..amu ¢ • § � i {p c a— gg \ I � h yilk ... .....a.. �.-�_—__'-• 1 I` nl } - J_ _ „1 1 l - � - - - - - - 7 -- --.9")OA— a ill\ UA0� 0'9) Pi£Z A � I I I soaveomsv ios .sa niow Em,.kur�. wi—ld.bu—iaq NfN u - -- SWUVAT13 V ONimine 1A&M MIS p` Ey !o30MIS3ININ ispA ' 7agg Ex 9 R 3NI13S�d8� xxx A1NgO3 NOSNIJJF 133815 13JdVd i0 3O0]m1tl3WA �1'1I,�� r ° xn aflvxoJs Jaaxva �.o h a N O G z aD 3 U ~ O m Q = „ G U O 00 m U 0 O 0. U U W C7 z z � o o O H z IW w v�1 z w w w 0.4 F 0-4 o w ¢ w z c� z Q A A W `a 0-4 of rw � o 3 O a 0 z � � O � O O � U l m ,o+a'�ssm.... tsmmsaxe . xse'ortmea war euaeora�vxros .3�smx�on kk1 -n . Emwgd . Boua 0-3 -_ _ 3 N I l3S�d8� .6N xxx - -- — nro Ae avnen�a xoumnsao w�au SPgLLYA313 8 9NIQlln6NrN 133a15 133XYd OCIS 39tl2JO1S NIW 1332llS 13d21Vd urvnoo rvosa3id3 oola iY3 m 10 AlIJ .7TI fiflYiIQiS JadZIVd s 8 `yr 1gg � • t o c� ffe � f I P�4mm owl 0 z O ¢` Q w A W Q w �'I � a �I pq a N� o� o� I fE waa.,.»'.�..w' m, Ncseavrecrc oxeormwe NII SKnine N MAS 113MVdOM 3H 30tl801S INIW 1332llS 13321tld 3 N I l3 SdB . — — UN Q NOS iii 3 Oltl lY30 JO Al1J 9" N an HOYlIOdS d9dwd zzz gg ee� nra ae QLIYdLW rau�csio r'ocwd „ �^ E� So z a o so i I i V 2 O z O E- o w w <o Q 3v w c7 z mm w A A Q w mm a Mma-vssesmceix3 sw,.oa 5! -Ns &M -id 54-63 3NI13SVft N'r^'-- YwaN xxx - =�Y� uNnW Nosa3aJ3r SNOLLYA313 a Maine 13mS AkWd OCIS 30V801S INIW AMS 13JdVd 33aia 1Y3NM do ui� aovxYoas rsa�va 20, e�gggaqg� �° 6fl � aaa o4", yy�4y $ES 3 _ Se g g€ i Rae 1! 1� d w C7 Z d a w w A COO77 Q A 1i z_ z z [-� A w A A � No a o� "', —", ......... ioi°OA'�'°SO"�"' s a c s�aasrma wms comrom.�N��saroi oss EgJw Ww—_ �5 Fwd 3NI135d8� NfN --- _. _ waH .� - SNOUVA313 3 ONI(nine AMS A&Vd OClS 1OV801S INIW 13381S 13AVd uNnoo Nos63333r 3sala iv3wn ao Al17 aflvxars iaaxva E g F qq i. e a� € ,a �„, „�u„� a i I I V O z { o O F rc o w a .� w Q w E- wz � w z o E'er f A A 1.4 w l =� I N.. a o0 o0 !I i �wwoa�nom°1°si 0D�0�°d wsom.uwsmro�wa "IN SNOuvA3l3 a'JNIQ11nB 133HLS AMd OSIS QkEw'E ^5 qd 3 3�Va01S INIW 1332115 13321tld ee E e co `J 3 � I � � Sd Ywa- x% _ _ __ A1Nf10� NOSa3J�31 3`JOItl DTI HOYHois lAaWC1 nro ae mwmm xou�o Noe au z z U Q Z Z y W N � m O Ulm ZU pU O O-0 Q m U Q O O U p Z p m p m U � O U I w � I x W I F z z z z s o 0-4 w w w a w w Z �oo w w w H U w � W z W � � w x I o CIA z z vi I 0-4 A as I I . i . �Lk z Q ' I - z U 6 �oa We�Od mss _ moo/ \ \ •§||, | § $ ]� • ,e§ \ � «q i " � | � IN� i � ! $&��. M , f v a"a'" — uNno osa3a33r 30V801Sjm1NIV11A pupymMIS 13J8VdDma 1V3WA ao ula amw>a� N3RAM . tants opi osv NVId 39VNIVHG qaq EgYreK. puryuoy.__ z qq g I o 3 N 113 S d8 Ak nua aruv,a a Noua¢o 3a wIs a Oln aO"Oss Zgawa II � ---- — — �rGW� ❑dgl '\ ,l 111 ��� ,VIII I�1 Se AW a im JillIII v r_ ���` AvvAvvvvvv`vvv I v I \ _ v 111, illilil m���s�..&k6� IIII I P=£zb �� IIIIIII I'lll I'`♦ \I I\ ``I \\I \I \I I I I' I 1 __ III III Illi \ � \\\\ \\ ill\II \\ I 111 VIII I'Il Illi r op�■s1 Q3- � .a U8 pp�� II\\\\/I I �' 11 II X11 11 II n VI I L,,.II II \\II I II II JIM IJ J � I i I�-1 J y' 1 R \ l \ Y J'1 C\'\r"��ia - r I � �i CERTIFICATION STATEMENT I HEREBY AFFIRM THAT THIS DRAINAGE STUDY AND PLAN FOR THE PARFET PARK MINI STORAGE PROJECT WAS PREPARED BY ME (OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION) FOR THE OWNERS THEREOF AND IS, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE SITE DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS UDFCD MANUAL AND APPROVED VARIANCES. I UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE DOES NOT AND WILL NOT ASSUME LIABILITY FOR DRAINAGE FACILITIES DESIGNED BY OTHERS. �{ to -t5.15 L r r ' REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER STATE OF COLORADO NO. 39820 PARFET STORAGE FINAL DRAINAGE STUDY 1. INTRODUCTION A. SITE LOCATION The Parfet Storage site is located on 3.48 acres north of Interstate 70, east of Parfet Street, south of Ridge Road and the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad and northwest of Oak Street, in the City of Wheat Ridge, Jefferson County, Colorado. The project site is subdivided as Lots 1 and 2 in Parfet Park Tract 2 Replat #2 located in the northeast quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 16, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the 6th Principal Meridian. The site is surrounded by commercial development to the north and east. Single family residences border the west side of the site. Undeveloped agricultural land borders the south side of the site. Vehicular access is provided from Parfet Street in the northwest corner of the site. B. SITE DESCRIPTION An existing single family home in the northwest portion of the site is currently being used for commercial purposes. The southern portion of the site is undeveloped and is crossed by both the Swadley and Wadsworth irrigation ditches. The Swadley Ditch drains from west to east through the center of the site within a 36" pipe. A large portion of Lot 2 was recently covered with fill dirt to create a flatter site which has been covered with recycled concrete. A small detention basin located on the south end of Lot 2 with a controlled outlet was designed and approved in 2010 and has been graded at the base of the slope, just south of the Wadsworth Ditch. Topography on the site slopes southerly at 2 to 40 percent grades. The ground cover around the outside edges of the site is characterized by native weeds and grasses, along with deciduous and coniferous tree, while the center of the site is primarily covered by the recycled concrete. The Soils Conservation Service soil survey mapping shows both Nunn clay loam (0-2%) and Ustic Torriorthents, loamy (15.50%), as the native soils in the area (U.S. Department of Agriculture). These soils belong to hydrologic soil group C. C. PROPOSED PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed improvements to the site are to be constructed in phases. The initial phase is to develop Lot 1 with 6 new mini -warehouse storage units and improvements to the existing residence to convert it to office space. The second phase will be six additional units on Lot 2. Imperviousness on Lot 1 with both building and pavement improvements will total approximately 85% of the lot. Phase 2 imperviousness will total approximately 80% of the lot. The existing detention pond is proposed to be slightly enlarged and improved with phase 1 (Lot 1 improvements) to accommodate the initial phase of construction. Include a description of the additional modifications needed to allow for the completion of the full build -out condition to complete Phase 2 (accqunting for the stated 80% imperviousness on Lot 2). GENERAL COMMENT: Please use complete sentences in the Discussion portion of the Report rather just than copying text from the City -standard outline. D. FLOOD HAZARD AND DRAINAGE STUDIES RELEVANT TO SITE The project site is located within Zone C, according to the Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Map panel 08059CO211F (February 5, 2014). Zone C contains areas of minimal flooding. Existing drainage studies affecting the site include, "Final Drainage Report Hoss Electric", prepared by Jones Engineering Associates, Inc. on December 13, 2010. 2. HISTORIC DRAINAGE SYSTEM (Discuss the following) A. MAJOR BASIN The project site is a north bank tributary to Clear Creek, which is located approximately one mile south of the site. Historically, the Parfet Storage site drains southerly in a sheet flow condition to the existing detention pond and released at a controlled rate southerly to the undeveloped land located immediately south of the site. An analysis of the historic drainage pattern has been prepared. The hydrologic analysis and hydraulic design for the site is based on the criteria established in the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual (Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, 1999/2001) and the City of Wheat Ridge Site Drainage Requirements. The Rational Method was used to calculate peak runoff flows for the sub -basins (refer to forms SF -2 and SF -3 in appendices). Runoff flows were analyzed for the 5 -year and 100 -year storms, in conformance with City of Wheat Ridge criteria. B. SUB -BASIN AND SITE DRAINAGE In the historic condition the project site is divided into two basins. • Basin OS -1 (0.10 acres) consists of a undeveloped land that currently drains offsite to the north and east. • Basin H1 (1.18) encompasses the majority of the site, with flows moving from north to south and from west to east. These flows are typically captured in an existing gutter at the south edge of Lot 1, where they are intended to be conveyed to the east and then routed to the existing detention pond via overland flow. There are deficiencies in the existing site grading prevent complete capture of these flows. The existing detention facility was sized to be in compliance with City criteria for the current imperviousness on Lot 1. Based on the previous design it was intended to provide Water quality capture volume (WQCV) as well as 10 and 100 year storage and release detained runoff at restricted rates to the south edge of the property. Per the original design the minor and major release rates were 0.5 cfs and 3.1 cfs during the respective storm events. Please remove -see GENERAL COMMENT above 3. PROPOSED (DEVELOPED) DRAINAGE SYSTEM (Discus wing) A. CRITERIA 1) The developed site in Lot 1 will consist of two basins. • Basin OS -1 (0.04 acres) consists of a small portion of landscaped 2 Public Works highly suggests that the drainage for this site should be area at the north end of the site that drains to the adjacent designed for the full build -out property in the historic condition. Any runoff from this basin will (including Lot 2) condition at this be compensated for in the final detention volume. time. It is obvious that the owner ' Basin P1( 1.18 acres) encompasses most of the site in Lot 1. This knows what he is going to build basin will contain the existing building to remain and 6 new (80% impervious), so there's no storage buildings, along with associated asphalt and concrete reason not to design for this now. paving. This basin drains to the south and east, typically, where it As such, the runoff calculations is captured by the existing curb and cutter along the south must include a sub -basin property line. These flows will release to a proposed swale information for Lot 2. running along the west property line of Lott, where they will eventually terminate in the detention pond. Roof drains will be piped underground and daylight into the proposed swale. For the purposes of this analysis, Design Point 1 is placed at the southern boundary of Lot 1, where flows exit to Lot 2. 2) For this analysis, the Rational Method was used. Standard Forms for the historic and proposed conditions can be found in the appendices. 3) Design storm frequencies — For this analysis the initial (5 -yr) and major (100 -yr) storms were used. y Need to discuss the proposed underdrain system. B. RUNOFF 1) For basin OS -1 the developed runoff will be 0.02 cfs in the 5 -yr event and 0.12 cfs in the 100 -yr event. For Basin P1, the runoff will be 4.14 cfs in the minor event and 7.76 cfs in the major event. This does not apply 2) Runoff from Basin Os -1 will have a negligible impact on the adjacent property. in this instance; Flows from Basin P1 are expected to be fully captured. please remove. 3 A grass lined swale will transport flows from Lot 1 to the detention pond at the south end of Lot 2. The proposed swale exceeds the max. allowable slope C. DET TION of 6%; an alternative conveyance such as a pipe w/drop major drainageway: If the MH structure is more appropriate. either Clear Creek or Lena Gulc a esig n pointwithin the basin is 10minutes or„,Ie CVforthe site will be requed (no floo a t riu.” Full Spectrum Detention facilities: This follows the UDFCD EURV criteria, except 1) The structural BMP to be utilized for water qualit that no mention is made that the existing outlet basin. The existing EDB will be modifiedJAce-fee structure will need to be reconstructed to be a 2 - proposed development. stage system (EURV & 100 -yr) rather that the 2) The volumes required and provided are:multi-stage design of the WQCV, 5 -yr, 100 -yr A. Excess Urban Runoff (EURV)=0.26 system - please refer to item 5) below. B. 100 -yr: 100% EURV + the full 100- .3) Water surface elevations: 100-yr=5388.0RV=5387.00. aes: -yr and EURV, based upon a 72 -hour maximum i Completely drain the EURV from the pond. Release rates will be maintained from As stated above, the detent It site stiould 6e accounted for in this design just as the runoff does. Due to the steepness of the slope from Lot 1 to Lot 2 a pipe with drop (manhole) structure is going to be required anyway, so why not add a stub -out for Lot 2 at the MH so when Lot 2 is developed it's a simple tie-in to address the runoff from Phase 2? And if the existing pond will need to be re -graded anyway, why not also complete the grading to address Phase 2 at the same time? Even if your client decides to not do the field work with Phase 1, completing the design will still save him money (and time) in the long -run. previous analysis. The outlet structure will not be modified. The 5 year release rate is 0.5 cfs. The 100 year release rate is 3.1 CFS _ _..:­.__ _­­ :._ SL. - _..:_.:------ ...:11 -�r�ii cniauiig vu uc�a a McLMIc iii c-1115 VW- vein Ic IIUIL -\ 6) and 7) A concrete trickle channel is not proposed. The existing pond will be re -graded to fully drain, with a minimum pond bott longitudinal slope of 2%. 8) Excess stormwater will pass through the pond, overtop the berm, and maintain historic flow patterns to the south. 9) The emergency overflow for the pond is located on the south side of the berm and will return flows in the historic drainage p th to the south. 10) The existing outlet structure will be preserved. 11) The outlet structure design shall incor orate the standard Wheat Ridge Well Screen: U.S. Filter Stainless Steel We I -Screen, or approved equivalent, Public Works always recommends incorporating a 2' wide concrete trickle channel to ensure the pond fully drains as it minimized the potential mosquito habitat the owner may have to continually address. D. No public streets will be impacted as part of this design. iT channel design for the grass swale located along the west site of the site was to be in Requirements of Table MD -3 of the UDFCD Desi n Manual. The max velocity for the chan I is under 5.0 ft/sec the wax flow depth in the channel or the 100 -yr developed flow is approx mately 0.5 feet with an additional 1 foot of freeboard prove osion protection measures h ve been implemented in the design where F. No new sewers or culverts are inc*orated in this design. Roof drains will be piped rground. CONCLUSIONS A. DISCUSS IMPACT OF IMPROVEMENT The proposed drainage design has been prep 1 use proposed on Lot 1. The intended construdl ch/nehave been designed tc convey fre. Runoff released from the detenti sh condition before entering the down! �d for the initial phase of the storage warehouse on does not include any public streets. Drainage nor and major storm events with additional ►n facility has been designed to disperse to a ream property. B. STATE COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE CRITER A The drainage conveyance and detention volume as been designed in compliance with The City of Wheat Ridge Site Drainage Requirements and FCD manual. C. FLOOD HAZRD No floodplains shall be impacted by this project See above comments regarding designing for full build -out. For grass -lined channels the longitudinal slopes are limited to 0.6%<0.2%, per the criteria found on same Table MD -3 in the UDFCD Volume 1 referenced herein. The proposed slope for this channel exceeds 8%, so a different design must be utilized. Public Works 4 recommends incorporating an underground pipe with drop manhole into this design. 5. REFERENCES City of Wheat Ridge Site Drainage Requirements October, 2014 Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual, Vol. 1, 2 and 3, Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, Denver, Colorado, Current Version. Civil Engineering Reference Manual, Ninth Edition, Michael R. Lindeburg, P.E., 2003. Final Drainage Report, Hoss Electric, Jones Engineering Associates Inc., December 13, 2010. APPENDIX �- � � j "I• y ❑ iii u,pu ILF _ , - ti;t, - Miller St o • El 41 a� W N1 ` - f Tj w L CC) . r � CY LL, LO Q) Ou 0 L2 0 n A. FIRM MAP & SOILS MAP 39° 47'22" N 39° 47' 13" N 3 Hydrologic Soil Group—Golden Area, Colorado, Parts of Denver, Douglas, Jefferson, and Park Counties 3 (Parfet Storage) 489630 489660 489690 489720 489750 3 �o F Map Scale: 1:1,270 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet N Meters 0 15 30 60 90 /� Feet ,N1 0 50 100 200 300 Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: U`TM Zone 13N WGS84 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey QQ 39° 47 2Z'N xi M M M O O M O n N V O N C O 39° 4T 13" N 489780 489810 3 r` r. 8/3/2015 Page 1 of 4 LO -It O O N CV c') 00 m a f6 o o 00 N m C_ N c U 0 s T L 0. @ O) N L to N _ m O c to o >o U U N N U co fo �C)�. _ Q a) -C Cl) (Oj O C C to O a 67 Z N y L a) U 0 'O C N N a) V N O C_ 0 0. Iii U U m U] O "NO m a) "O 7 9 0 7 N N 'C O f6 N O N C E a) 0 U U N N Cc:) U O `o C N t` O 83 ,'o- O NC'i O N L a) U y a (6 O -_ O O E N 4 0 O (6 a m a) m 'O fo "00 a) 2 C- Z M L.-� a) fo y a N O U) U co d E C O N O N - ...: N W E m L >, a) a) C O L O O -p N It Z 00 CD L 7 en N O) E O a C 7 d N N 'p N N Q W N 3 "O U o N L 0 C N a a) E a fB E U .N LLJ 0 N 7 f6 cm O C, L `O N N N (V75 O N 3 N co C N fo O U N 6 co y o N a L 2 C N o (n O U c aa) a) a 2 C a) O Q a > E E 3 u o c 0 a) - m (� 3 0 p o y ns =o o co n ai Q O ° w o a'm � O N a) oaf (>D 2c: � m >a�o. 3 E_o - f QYc N o L E 2 cu a)mEs O C O (n 0>.'o C C a) f6 L L a) 7 N U' cu (n a) N `O a) L CO a) a 'N y O a (D N L O >. O N C fm U a, 0 a) s N ffl > � > _ E a O (n N a'C coi O -O 2-0 O � > O � 4) 3 MM Q� r o E N a p > L -R' z d' L� Q O N co ; a) — C� O N N O N C R fo @ O N fU E a) O- co co - C N C (6 'mg f6 'O 'O Q O 'O L= C N a> >+ > U N a o O N N N co E O� >' 7 o C: o OU o c >' m �U w 3a --0 Q�� y @ =a Q9 _ (n (U y C E iA N E (n 0- f6 E C O O C O O 7 0 'O a) -) Z Q O a N fo C 0 C a 7 fT C N fU cm a E a) 7 U co a E a) U C N 5 Q N Vi O T E N L 0 a 41 f6 (6 3 U N E n. fo (6 a E O 4 O u) a .�6 a) U 2 o. a N> T- in 0 cn u) `O 0 E fo E o LU CU Q L)i L) .�= LO -It O O N CV c') 00 m a f6 N 0 c c U 0 s T L 0. @ '06 O c to N y y 6 fUO N O o N N a E N O 0 fY rr L 0_ co N N af N cn 0 U o Z n o X a Q ommou: CL F Q) m W 0 a.0 ca 10 N N o t0 O 0 Z: to C ma) O y O a) a� Q O T N N C N O 0.Q C -I O mQ a m m U O z M, a m m U C) 0 Z �Q a m m ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ '0 i .O R^I yp •p y U) l N Q to LO -It O O N CV c') 00 m a Hydrologic Soil Group—Golden Area, Colorado, Parts of Denver, Douglas, Jefferson, and Park Counties Hydrologic Soil Group Parfet Storage Hydrologic Soil Group— Summary by Map Unit— Golden Area, Colorado, Parts of Denver, Douglas, Jefferson, and Park Counties (CO641) Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 2 Alda-Niwot complex, 0 to B 0.9 23.3% 2 percent slopes 102 Nunn clay loam, 0 to 2 C 1.1 30.2% percent slopes 111 Pits, gravel A 0.0 0.8% 165 Ustic Torriorthents, A 1.7 45.7% loamy, 15 to 50 percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest 3.8 100.0% USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 8/3/2015 '� Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 4 Hydrologic Soil Group—Golden Area, Colorado, Parts of Denver, Douglas, Jefferson, and Park Counties Description Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long -duration storms. The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and three dual classes (A/D, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink -swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes. Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified Tie-break Rule: Higher Parfet Storage USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 8/3/2015 '� Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 4 B. RAINFALL DATA Q LU a c 5 w U 2 I F— t!� 2 UJI I,— Z 3 2 0 O 9 8 7 O 6 z 1 G Q LU a c 5 w U 2 I F— t!� 2 UJI I,— Z 3 2 0 O 10 20 30 40 50 60 TIME IN MINUTES FIGURE 5-1 EXAMPLE 5.2 TIME - INTENSITY - FREQUENCY CURVES T. 3 S. R.66 W. 5-1-84 URBAN DRAINAGE d FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 1 A recent subdivision has an approved Drainage Report/Plan on file. 32 Rev. 10/14 Reference the UDFCD Criteria Not required for a Preliminary Report 1 G y� X �, V r S ti c .- 2 YEAR 10 20 30 40 50 60 TIME IN MINUTES FIGURE 5-1 EXAMPLE 5.2 TIME - INTENSITY - FREQUENCY CURVES T. 3 S. R.66 W. 5-1-84 URBAN DRAINAGE d FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 1 A recent subdivision has an approved Drainage Report/Plan on file. 32 Rev. 10/14 Reference the UDFCD Criteria Not required for a Preliminary Report TABLE RO.3 Recommended Percentage Imperviousness Values Land Use or Surface Characteristics Percentage Imperviousness Business: Commercial areas 95 Neighborhood areas 85 Residential: Single-family Multi -unit detached 60 Multi -unit attached 75 Half -acre lot or larger Apartments 80 Industrial: Light areas 80 Heavy areas 90 Parks, cemeteries 5 Playgrounds 10 Schools 50 Railroad yard areas 15 Undeveloped Areas: Historic flow analysis 2 Greenbelts, agricultural 2 Off-site flow analysis when land use not defined 45 Streets: Paved 100 Gravel(packed) 40 Drive and walks 90 Roofs 90 Lawns, sandy soil 0 Lawns, clayey soil 0 *See Figures RO-3 through RO-5, Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual, Volume 1, June 2001, for percentage imperviousness. 1 A recent subdivision has an approved Drainage Report/Plan on file. 33 Rev. 10/14 Reference the UDFCD Criteria Not required for a Preliminary Report Public Works highly recommends that the design and related calculations be completed for the entire full build -out condition. As such, Lot 2 should be included into the drainage design at this time (irrespective of when it will be constructed). C. RATIONAL METHOD CALCULATIONS 0 0 0 CO O V M — Cl) O O LO Ln O t6 tD LC) O O O O CD U N O O't O N N V U O O G O lit QLn _ U CMO O M M 0 U o o ® o U < W N O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N o O O O O O > N N p N�/ O¢ Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O Q p LL O JJ p o 0 o OO U o 0 Cl C > o 0 a _ =LOco� U000 =Q Uro r' o o o p o0 0 Cl) Z T W'R YOLOO M c.4 co Y�j 2 o 0 0 O 0 > o0 LI <O OO a¢ O ® O O 00 U- U- W Q 0 0 0 0U'T 1q, Q CD W 0 O C % opo 0 O (n �- N Q 0 0 0 0 U) Q p Q 0 0 O O O Q O O U >- z Q O cwn ow�oo owc� "' o LO o o I o > O V Z = 0 CO (7) rn Q o 0 0 0¢ o o o p o � w � � W C� �w Oo O c`') 0 w U M M O O > M O aQ 0 0 0 a Q 0 O N O O N w W p WLL LL LL LL N U) LL LL LL Z a��z =)U M000 Z V)O N a W mm C r m J Q Q Q Q Z 0 w w w moo _ UU<� CMZ O ZH ZH J� wLuDU cn o 0 v�0�� 00-1= wm eco mm�cn Of U _ U) to d0-U v '1, O O co U) U o _o co CD U o _N J O o Z . co LL H O Q t 0 j M J N Z Y Q Y U m W 0 J 2 oN Z O Z Y Q F- J CO y Q M � U � N � ~ � O U O > ° -- v� _ X.2 CVo Q -0 Q -o = LL W v V = J J a > 0 Lli U >~ O �- LL O F O O p N (j o c\1 0 CNN E Q � W p a o Z Q cn cn ~ Z u_ M o 0 W J � N � W o o Q t D a l27 M Q Z �_ a W i - C� r- co LO (D Q Z W Ir J O H U M (O M O co W V O O O LL J N co aZ Z N O n �J W U Q ri coE c m Z m~ 'N' a Coo :LLJ Q 50 m m 0 Z Z W D 0 ~ LL,Y Z O w-»w.W i II U Q O 0�=W QU o d d 0 v '1, i� �A I -I Ix �I �A �I O O 00 6 LO LO O O N () O O 00 6 O O O O N () 2-5 O O 6 a0 N h r, U U O O O W CJ o o Ci W QW U 00 O O O O O O O O N o O O O CL ~O LU Q oQ��0000000� r O O O O N O O 000 O O O oY:g J LU / J 0 000 J Oc) O W = CO ti = Q Q V 0 0 0 U— O p O 0 c> U) C/) F-YoLoo T- Z U) ��MCp U) Y Of O o a o LL ooC) W Q<,...o 0 o c p c- p UU LL. a < � V 0 0 0 0f _ a- Q _ U � U �" �— O t� c CO C3 O C a c CO W (� r N rt } 6 6 6 � Q Q< - O r O C5 C7 > ., - ; O U Q Q LL w O Q LL Q OAC` 0?Crn LL g pQ v er o a? � c > t'o) o a) Z d Q 0 0 0 of O O M O M W Q Q ui co CD m O O LU � ga co �?>QIO �. O O Q� < O O O c. LL N W M CO LL LL LL W W W z Ur Z <��Z 0000 000 �� cli YJ 10 m i co Q�ww J Q Q Q 0a_ Q 2i W W W ZZ Z� J� ZZ Wp HI-QY >�>->- "goo ��Dw �U O Ou)-O Z� �0 �m Q �Q LU WQ �a amm a m? O� f-cn v 0m a. a C) cn cn W, ., 0 o OD V o 0 _o t- o_ CD N_ U o 0 � J O Q C I M Z « o LL W O Q t CD CO M J N O Z_ 'U Y Q Y U m W 0 J 2 2 W U N Q ~ (D v Mm o u ZO Z VLO Y Q F J m w a M o W U C N M Q ~ W O J (n = WCL O J > v W >� W O m cu m a� ' +L+ Q Q 04 C w _o Cl)'a � aa) >a ILL C) N C J^ R J a s O w U > V O O o U- O 0 E Q W a o O o 00 - Z IH = O Z LL M W J _ M W J O oo a~ CD 0 Q Z� a L.Li0 z J < O ~ co o H LU ro �j ri � 0 r 0 LL o J �M a� � Z Z M C` W U o m LummLIJzm�aa��o a mo Ln Qom Y zzwo D a H H~ W C) C) fn Z z M O C7 L) Lli w a O II 0 0-j= m„ aaU W, ., ��i LU Lij LU ui LU LU Lu z 76 LL 0 LU LU z co I z z 03 LU LU ��I a. 00 LU I LU LU LL Z uj �, Lu D I Public Works highly recommends that the design and related calculations be completed for the entire full build -out condition. As such, Lot 2 should be included into the drainage design at this time (irrespective of when it will be constructed). D. HYDRAULIC COMPUTATIONS STAGE -STORAGE SIZING FOR DETENTION Project: Basin ID: Dani ----.-- sfie St°t° z na. sw sbF z I_ Fl.e Fl - W, > ori Sib smRz <----------C ---- -----> sBe Slope Design Information (Input): Check a. Width of Basin Bottom, W ft Right Ti Length of Basin Bottom, L = ft Isosceles Ti Dam Side -slope (HV), Zd = ft/ft Re( Circle / Storage Requirement from Sheet'M0 ed FAA': Stage -Storage Relationship: StoreOP Re Storage Requirement from Sheet 'Full -Spectrum': Jeed to include the UDFCD vorksheet "Detention Volume by he Full Spectrum Method' in the kppendix to support these /alues. U.avcresoftw W. D_� ksq..es in cells G32:G52) ft. Labels for WQCV, Minor, & Major Storage Stages (input) Water Surface Elevation ft (input) 5383.00 Side Slope (H:V) ft/ft Below El. (input) Basin Width at Stage ft (output) Basin Length at Stage ft (output) Surface Area at Stage ftZ (output) Surface Area at Stage ftZ User Overide 801 Volume Below Stage ft' (output) 500 Surface Area at Stage acres (Output) 0.018 Volume Below Stage acre -ft (output) 0.011 Target Volumes for WQCV, Minor, & Major Storage Volumes (for goal seek) 5384.00 3.00 1 0.00 0.00 2,139 1,970 0.049 0.045 5385.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3,706 4,893 0.085 0.112 5386.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4,729 9,110 0.109 0.209 5387.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 5,809 14,379 0.133 0.330 0.300 5388.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 6,946 20,757 0.159 0.477 5389.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 7,752 28,106 0.178 0.645 0.630 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A Copy of UD-Detention_v2.35-PH1, Basin 10115/2015,12:46 PM STAGE -STORAGE SIZING FOR DETENTION BASINS Project: Basin ID: STAGE -STORAGE CURVE FOR THE POND 5390.00 5389.00 5388.00 j 5387.00 d d N tm U) 5386.00 5385.00 5384.00 5383.00 0.01 0.11 0.21 0.31 0.41 0.51 0.61 0.71 Storage (acre-feet) Copy of UD-Detention_v2.35-PH1, Basin 10/15/2015, 12:46 PM DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1) MAJOR DRAINAGE Table MD-3—Design Submittal Checklist for Grass -Lined Channel Criterion Requirements ✓ Maximum velocity for 100 -year event: s 5.0 ft/sec for erosive soils <_ 7.0 ft/sec for erosion -resistant soils Manning's n >_ 0.035 used to check capacity Froude Number Manning's n <_ 0.030 used to check velocity and maximum Froude Number Froude number: < 0.5 for erosive soils and < 0.8 for non-erosive soils Maximum de th for 100- ear event <_ 5.0 ft outside of trickle channel The current design is over 8%, Longitudinal channel slope z0.2% and <_ 0.6% <— which exceeds the UDFCD Side slopes no s eeper an maximum longitudinal slope. Channel bottom cross -slope 1 % to 2% Centerline curve radius > 2 x top width for 100 -year event Channel bends checked for needed erosion protection (see Section 4.1.6.1 Erosion Control" of the Major Drainage Chapter). Channel bend protection, use Type V or VL soil riprap lining extended below channel bottom, buried and vegetated when called for at bends (see Section 4.1.6.1). Outfalls into channel > 1 foot above channel invert (use pipes, concrete -lined rundowns or grouted boulder rundowns) Adequate freeboard provided, including superelevation Grass species appropriate (drought resistant, sturdy, easily established, turf forming) Trickle channel (if any) sized for 2.0% of 100 -year design flow for fully developed, undetained condition in u/s watershed. Underdrain pipe (if any) diameter >_ 24 inches Note: not recommended or endorsed.] Underdrain pipe (if any) includes manhole access every 200 ft Underdrain pipe (if any) velocity >_ 3.0 ft/sec when one-half full Erosion protection measures included where necessary District Maintenance Eligibility Guidelines satisfied Continuous maintenance access road provided (minimum 8 -foot stable surface with 12 -foot clear width, 20 -feet at drop structures) Energy and hydraulic grade lines calculated, plotted, design discharges annotated 4.2 Composite Channels When the trickle flow channel capacity limits are exceeded as discussed earlier, the use of a composite channel is required, namely a channel with a stabilized low -flow section and an overflow section above it to carry major flow. It is best to assume that wetland and other flow -retarding vegetation will develop in the los-flow section over time. A fact that needs to be accounted for when designing a composite channel. Under certain circumstances, such as when existing wetland areas are affected or natural channels are modified, the USACE's Section 404 permitting process may mandate the use of composite Rev. 04/2008 MD -49 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District Channel Report Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk@ AutoCADO Civil 3D@ by Autodesk, Inc. Thursday, Oct 15 2015 For grass -lined channels the longitudinal slopes are Western Swale limited to 0.6%<0.2% per the criteria found on Table MD -3 of the UDFCD (refer to previous page). Triangular Highlighted Side Slopes (z:1) = 5.20, 5.20 Depth (ft) = 0.55 Total Depth (ft) = 1.50 Q (cfs) = 7.760 Area (sqft) = 1.57 Invert Elev (ft) = 5425.0 Velocity (ft/s) = 4.93 Slope (%) = 8.33 Wetted Perim (ft) = 5.82 N -Value = 0.035 Crit Depth, Yc (ft) = 0.68 Top Width (ft) = 5.72 Calculations EGL (ft) = 0.93 Compute by: Known Q Known Q (cfs) = 7.76 Elev (ft) Section 5427.00 5426.50 5426.00 5425.50 5425.00 5424.50 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Reach (ft) Depth (ft) 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 we ■wl-wral Channel Report Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk@ AutoCADO Civil 3D@ by Autodesk, Inc. Capacity Between Buildings Triangular Side Slopes (z:1) = 50.00, 50.00 Total Depth (ft) = 0.26 Invert Elev (ft) = 5432.84 Slope (%) = 2.50 N -Value = 0.030 Calculations Compute by: Q vs Depth No. Increments = 1 Elev (ft) Section 5434.00 5433.50 5433.00 5432.50 5432.00 Highlighted Depth (ft) Q (cfs) Area (sqft) Velocity (ft/s) Wetted Perim (ft) Crit Depth, Yc (ft) Top Width (ft) EGL (ft) Thursday, Oct 15 2015 = 0.26 = 6.788 = 3.38 = 2.01 = 26.01 = 0.26 = 26.00 = 0.32 Depth (ft) 1.16 M 0.16 -0.34 I I I I I I I 1 ' -0.84 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Reach (ft) 40 Final Drainage Report Hoss Electric PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT HOSS ELECTRIC WHEAT RIDGE, JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORADO Prepared for David Hoss P.O. Box 1041 Arvada, CO 80001 303-940-6000 Prepared by CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE] PUBLIC WORKS, ENGINEERING APPROVED FOR: ;i DRAINAGE ❑ SIDEWALK O CURS & GUTTER O STREET O MISCELLANEOUS O PLAT COMMENT CIVIL ENGINEER DATE SUBJECT TO FIELD INSPECTIONS Jones Engineering Associates, Inc. 2120 W. Littleton Blvd., Suite 205 Littleton, Colorado 80120 303-738-0283 '114e* re` ive CITY OF MEAT RIDGE December 8, 2010 PUBLIC WORKS Project No. 10056 DATEtz-hrllo RECEIVED izklg to Zub 5vDM;rrPfz- C:\Projects\10000\1005G\Word\lteports\10056 final drainage.doc l x WEIR AND ORIFICE SIZING 5 -YR ORIFICE inve center of pipe 86.60 86.79 PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE assumed dia = 0.38 ft 5 yr. Orifice dia. = 4.6 inches 100 -YR ORIFICE 100 yr WS inygd center of pipe H = 3.91 88.6 84.37 84.69 assumed dia = g = 32.2 C = 0.6 Q100 = 3.1 cfs A = Q100/(Cd * (2*g*H)^.5) A = 0.33 dia = 2 * ((A/3.14)^.5) dia 0.64 100 yr. Orifice dia. 7.7 inches EMERGENCY OVERFLOW !WEIR FOR DETENTION POND 100 -yr developed flow rate 8.6 cfs H = 1 L. = 2*Q100I(C*H"1.5) C = 3.32 Q100 = 8.6 L = 5 FEET 0.64 ft 5 yr WS H = 0.81 87.6 g = 32.2 C = 0.6 Q5 = 0.5 cfs A= Q5/(Cd * (2*g*H)^.5) A = 0.12 dia = 2 * ((A13.14)^.5) dia = 0.38 WEIR AND ORIFICE SIZING 5 -YR ORIFICE inve center of pipe 86.60 86.79 PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE assumed dia = 0.38 ft 5 yr. Orifice dia. = 4.6 inches 100 -YR ORIFICE 100 yr WS inygd center of pipe H = 3.91 88.6 84.37 84.69 assumed dia = g = 32.2 C = 0.6 Q100 = 3.1 cfs A = Q100/(Cd * (2*g*H)^.5) A = 0.33 dia = 2 * ((A/3.14)^.5) dia 0.64 100 yr. Orifice dia. 7.7 inches EMERGENCY OVERFLOW !WEIR FOR DETENTION POND 100 -yr developed flow rate 8.6 cfs H = 1 L. = 2*Q100I(C*H"1.5) C = 3.32 Q100 = 8.6 L = 5 FEET 0.64 ft DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL. (V. 3) m 0.2( 0 2 2 a 0.1( 9 0.0( 04- 0.04 W 0.01 0.02 STRUCTURAL. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE EXAMPLE: DWO = 4.5 ft A WQCV = 2.1 acre-feet SOLUTION: Required Area per Row = 1.75 in? j EQUATION: VVOCV in which, 40 =0.013DWo +0.22Dwa -0.10 O X 1b 04 /ri �d j �' Q.iC`fill o� I � � I I i 0.04 0.06 0.10 0.20 0.40 0.60 1.0 2.0 4,0 6.0 Required Area per Row,a (1n.2 ) ,13 FIGURE EDB -3 Water Quality Outlet Sizing: Extended Detention Basin (Dry) With 40 -hour Drain Time for Capture Volume Rev. 6-2002 S-45 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District I�4 i t Orifice Plate Perforation Sizing PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE circular Perforation Sizing Chart may be applied to orifice plate or vertical pipe outlet. N Hole Dia (in) Hole Dia Min. Sc (in) (in) Areo n=1 per Row (sq n-2 in) n=3 1 /�F 0.2507 g" 0.05 �^ 0.10 _OJ 5 5/16 0,313 �M 2 0.08 0.15^ 0.23 3/8 _ 0.375 2 0.11 0.22 0.33 7 15 0.438 2 0.15 0.30 0.4.5_ 1/:2 0.500 2 0.20 0139 0,59 9/16___ 0.563 - 3 0.25 0.5a 0.7_5_ 5/8 0.625 w 3 0.31 0.61 0.92 11/16 0.688 3 0,37 0.74 1.11 3/4 0.750 3 0.44 0.88 1.33 7/8 0.875 3 0.60 1.20 1.80 1 1,000 4 - 0,79 1,57 2.36 �1.125� 4 0.99 1,99 2,98 1 1/4 1.250 4 1.23 8.45 _3.68 1 3/8 1.375 4• 1.48 2, 9 7 4,45 1 1/2 1.500 4 1.77 3.53 5.30 1 5/8 11625 4 2.07 4.15 6.22 1 3/4 1,750 4 2.41 4,81 7.22 1 7 8 1.875 4 2.76 5.52 8.28 2 2.000 4 3.14 6.28 9.42 n = Number of columns of perforations Minimum steel plate thickness 1/4 5/16 3/8 " Rectangular Perforation Sizing Only one column of rectangular perforations allowed, Rectangular Height = 2 inches Rwctongolcar Width (inches) _ Required Area per Row (sq in) --•---�--�------�--�--�-�-----�--- 2" / L4 s< j Urban Drainage and Rood Control District (Drainage Criteria Manual (V•3) 3 ---- Fh-- W-Ovtlut Daia .d-1 Rectangular Min. Steel Hale Width Thickness 5" 1 4 61, 1 4 ' 7" 5/32 ., g" 11/32 " 10" 3 8 „ >10" 112 .1 Figure 5 WQCV Outlet Orifice Perforation Sizing E. DRAINAGE PLANS nwv ro� H s d NrN _ _ _ — _ NV1d 3JVNlvao u - - - - - - - - 133aLS LlMd alS cxa�o . enryuo &.—!a `81 — — 30V801S INIVI 1338iS 13JUVd �bboy� 3NIl3Sb8� u_ - — = N 0J NOStl33J3f OI 1tl3H d0 u17 2�Y� yp99 tl !� a ! e xxx DTI flflVYQIS .L9d2IVd @ e = @ nva u ¢rxra3ud NDLLdVJSiG N06Nil —Rja��R a IN Iri r a i a n I g E b 51!o Jail IItoo � �. i� A� I � z ---- r V, 1 r I i \ II I,i s s.grgx I 3 `�OQ {V7/ \ e aA CI£Z �1.- --$gggH a E ms$ £ B Oki -7 11 VIII I I , I I I YI I I I I �I II ' i Y I Y II III 'Y IIlli I�III. �II _____--- _-_ Kp i r� '�bogR 141In Ii e� 'ro'Gt_ "Yi _4OF- A-- - -� 'i-- Na UAOd IAV PJ I > v it t ' I City of �Wheat�dge MUNITY DEVELOPMENT Community Development 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 303.235.2846 Fax: 303.235.2857 Community Development Referral Form Date: October 23, 2015 Response Due: November 5, 2015 The Wheat Ridge Community Development Department has received a request for approval of a Planned Building Group plan on property zoned Industrial- Employment (I -E) located at 5130 Parfet Street. The intent of the application is to allow the construction of seven mini -warehouse buildings with an existing office building to remain on the northern part of the site. The southern portion of the site will remain vacant. No response from you will constitute having no objections or concerns regarding this proposal. Case No.: PBG -15-01 /Parfet Storage Request: Approval of a Planned Building Group Plan in I -E for construction of seven mini - warehouse buildings with an existing office. The property is comprised of two parcels and has a combined area of 3.5 acres. The northern portion of the site is the former home to an electrical contractor's office and storage yard but has been unused for several years. The southern portion of the site is currently vacant. A strip of land with a steep grade separates the two portions of the property. No development of the southern portion of the property is proposed at this time. The property was recently rezoned from Planned Industrial Development (PID) and Agricultural -One (A-1) to Industrial -Employment (I -E). Once the planned building group plan is processed, a building permit for site development will be required. Please inform the case manager of any concerns about the site's ability for future development based on the proposed zoning. At the time of site plan review, when a specific development proposal is available, an additional referral regarding utility needs for the proposed development will be issued. Case Manager: Meredith Reckert Voice: 303.235.2848 Fax: 303.235.2857 Email: mreckert&i.wheatridge.co.us DISTRIBUTION: Valley Water District Fruitdale Sanitation District Arvada Fire District Xcel Energy AT&T Broadband Wheat Ridge Public Works Wheat Ridge Economic Development Wheat Ridge Police Department Wheat Ridge Building Division "The Carnation City" Vicinity map "The Carnation City" 2 ;,,`o?o1loga39070 ya9-aoil 5!'o7'y9 p1n Ceun F Co104&010 'sW/= FINAL PLAT PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION, TRACT 2 REPLAT #2 A RESUBDIVISION OF PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION TRACT 2 REPLAT LOCATED IN THE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORADO OWNER'S CERTIFICATE 1, DAVID ROSS, BONG THE OWNER OF REAL PROPERTY CONTAINING 3.483 ACRES DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION; TRACT 2. AS PLATTED IN THE RECORDS OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORADO. SAID LAND IS LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTH 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N0013'10'W, 1318.27 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT, BONG THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE SB9'46'50'W, 228.33 FEET; THENCE NOO'13'10'W, 215.00 FEET; THENCE SB9'46'50'W, 25.00 FEET; THENCE N00'13'10'W, 275.00 FEET; THENCE S89'46'50'W, 275.00 FEET TO THE EAST UNE OF PARFET STREET; THENCE NDO13'10'W ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 152.50 FEET TO THE SOUTH UNE OF GRACE MANAGEMENT (REC. NO. 83008646); THENCE SB9'47'40'E ALONG SAID SOUTH UNE. 325.01 FEET TO THE WEST UNE OF EATHERTON (REC. NO. F0954998); THENCE S0013'10'E ALONG SAID WEST LINE, 229.77 FEET TO THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID EATHERTON; THENCE N8946'50'E ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT, 203.33 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SW 1/4 SECTION; THENCE SDO'13'10'E ALONG SAID 1/4 SECTION UNE 410.32 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING AN AREA AS DESCRIBED OF 151,726 SQUARE FEET, OR 3.483 ACRES, MORE OR LESS BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 16 MONUMENTED AT BOTH THE SOUTH 1/4 CORNER AND CENTER 1/4 CORNER BY A 3-1/2' BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX LS #13212. SAID UNE BEARS NDO'13'10'W PER THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE COORDINATE SYSTEM. HAVE LAID OUT, SUBDIVIDED, AND PLATTED SAID LAND AS PER THE DRAWING HEREON CONTAINED UNDER THE NAME AND STYLE OF PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION, TRACT 2 REPLAT i2. A SUBDIVISION OF A PART OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO AND BY THESE PRESENTS DO DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE AND THOSE MUNICIPALLY OWNED AND/OR MUNICIPALLY FRANCHISED UTILITIES AND SERVICES THOSE PORTIONS OF REAL PROPERTY SHOWN AS EASEMENTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT FOR ALL SERVICES, THIS INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO TELEPHONE AND ELECTRIC LINES GAS LINES, WATER AND SANITARY SEWER LINES HYDRANTS, STORM WATER SYSTEMS AND PIPES, DETENTION PONDS, STREET LIGHTS AND ALL APPURTENANCES THERETO. AVID HOSS, OWNER STATE OF COLORADO SS COUNTY OF JEFFERSON ) THE FOREGOING DEDICATION ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS d&DAY OF Y'/1/3Y I,' 2011- BY DAVID ROSS. WI Y HAND AND OFFlOAL SEAL ��FSR _�U-IN rP a 1 e a QE����ll� VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1"=2000' GENERAL NOTES 1. ACCORDING TO FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP OSOOICO330G, DATED AUGUST 16, 1995, THE PROJECT SITE UES IN ZONE X (UNSHADED), WHICH IS DEFINED AS, "AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN. 2. ANY PERSON WHO KNOWINGLY REMOVES, ALTERS OR DEFACES ANY PUBLIC LAND SURVEY MONUMENT OR LAND BOUNDARY MONUMENT OR ACCESSORY, COMMITS A CLASS TWO (2) MISDEMEANOR PURSUANT TO STATE STATUTE 18-4-508, C.R.S. 3. NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. 4. BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE EAST UNE, SW 1/4, SECTION 16 BEARS NO'13'10'W PER THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE DATUM. R IS MONUMENTED AT THE CENTER CORNER (CITY CONTROL POINT 12309) BY A FOUND 3-1/4' BRASS CAP ON ALUMINUM MONUMENT IN RANGE BOX LS 13212) AND AT THE SOUTH 1/4 CORNER (CITY CONTROL POINT 13309) BY A FOUND 3-1/4' ALUMINUM CAP ON MONUMENT IN RANGE BOX LS 13212). 5. THE COORDINATE SYSTEM IS A GROUND-BASED STATE PLANE MODIFIED COORDINATE SYSTEM, NAD 83/92, CENTRAL ZONE 0502 PER CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PUBLISHED VALUES. 6. THE VERTICAL DATUM IS THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD88). 7. THE GROUND TO GRID COMBINED SALE FACTOR IS 0.99974780300, SCALED FROM BASE POINT PHAC 1 (PERMANENT HIGH ACCURACY CONTROL POINT #1) WHICH HAS THE FOLLOWING COORDINATE VALUES PHAC 1: NORTHING: 1701258.75 EASTING: 3118217.58 ELEVATION: 5471.62 8. PER COLORADO REVISED STATUTES SEC. 38-51-106 (L), ALL LINEAL UNITS DEPICTED ON THIS LAND SURVERY PLAT ARE U.S. SURVEY FEET. ONE METER EQUALS 39.37 DIVIDED BY 12 U.S. SURVEY FEET ACCORDING TO THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY. 9. THE GEODETIC POINT COORDINATE DATA SHOWN HEREIN HAS BEEN DERIVED FROM THE COLORADO COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983, CENTRAL ZONE 0502, AND HAS A HORIZONTAL ACCURACY CLASSIFICATION OF 0.04 U.S. SURVEY FEET AT THE 95% CONFIDENCE LEVEL, AS DEFINED IN THE GEOSPATIAL POSITIONING ACCURACY STANDARDS OF THE FEDERAL GEODETIC CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE (FGDC-STD-077.2-1998). 10. THE TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION IS THREE. 11. THE STORM DETENTION AREA HEREON SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED BY THE OWNER AND SUBSEQUENT OWNERS, HEIRS, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. IN THE EVENT THAT SUCH CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE IS NOT PERFORMED BY SAID OWNER, THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO ENTER SUCH AREA AND PERFORM NECESSARY WORK, THE COST OF WHICH SAID OWNER, HEIRS, SUCCESSORS, AND ASSIGNS AGREES TO PAY. NO BUILDING OR STRUCTURE WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE DETENTION AREA AND NO CHANGES OR ALTERATIONS AFFECTING THE HYDRAULIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DETENTION AREA WILL BE MADE WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS. 12. AT THE TIME LOTS 2 IS DEVELOPED THE RUNOFF DRAINING FROM LOT i MAY BE CHANNELIZED OR PIPED TO THE DETENTION POND AND THE ASSOCIATED DRAINAGE EASEMENT MAY BE REDUCED IN SIZE. THE DETENTION POND MAY ALSO BE RECONFIGURED ALONG WITH THE ASSOCIATED DETENTION EASEMENT. 13. SEE TITLE COMMITMENT ABC70207586-2 PREPARED BY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ON FEBRUARY 26, 2008 AT 5:00 P.M. FOR MATTERS RELATED TO TITLE FOR THIS PROPERTY. INDEX OF SHEETS COVER SHEET SHEET 1 FINAL PLAT EXHIBIT SHEET 2 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I, JAMES T. JONES, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARY OF PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION, TRACT 2 REPLAT /2 WAS MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOW-EDGE,INFORMATION AND BELIEF, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE COLORADO STATUTES CURRENT REVISED EDITION AS AMENDED. THE ACCOMPANYING PLAT ACCURATELY REPRESENTS SAID SURVEY. SIGNED THIS LL' DAY OF Z-1--4 201[. A/ lluelz JAlJE AD JONES; PROMSIONAL LAND COLORADO PLS NO. 19606 JONES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIF�1I�C�A��T""ION RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL THIS i� AY OF2!l-&V- ..70// . BY THE VA4�EA_TQRIDGE �PLANNING COMMISSION. CC CHAIRPERSON k egKe CITY CERTIFICATION APPROVED THIS AY OF BY THE WHEAT RIDGE CITY COUNCIL ATTEST CLE M Y P. CIO�°� q� MMUNITY DE iPM DIRECTO ~ � u A DIRECTOR OF a BUC WORKS f + -Kf7� COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE TH AVENUE STATE OF COLORADO 1.11E 3 k\0� ROAD w COUNTY OF JEFFERSON ) ' I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE� CC�UNj�11'' CLERK ATY•'07•'YYO'CLOCK PT AVENUE 35 N R BOOK = PACE RECEPTION NO. n"i0 10 44TH AVENUE JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1"=2000' GENERAL NOTES 1. ACCORDING TO FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP OSOOICO330G, DATED AUGUST 16, 1995, THE PROJECT SITE UES IN ZONE X (UNSHADED), WHICH IS DEFINED AS, "AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN. 2. ANY PERSON WHO KNOWINGLY REMOVES, ALTERS OR DEFACES ANY PUBLIC LAND SURVEY MONUMENT OR LAND BOUNDARY MONUMENT OR ACCESSORY, COMMITS A CLASS TWO (2) MISDEMEANOR PURSUANT TO STATE STATUTE 18-4-508, C.R.S. 3. NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. 4. BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE EAST UNE, SW 1/4, SECTION 16 BEARS NO'13'10'W PER THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE DATUM. R IS MONUMENTED AT THE CENTER CORNER (CITY CONTROL POINT 12309) BY A FOUND 3-1/4' BRASS CAP ON ALUMINUM MONUMENT IN RANGE BOX LS 13212) AND AT THE SOUTH 1/4 CORNER (CITY CONTROL POINT 13309) BY A FOUND 3-1/4' ALUMINUM CAP ON MONUMENT IN RANGE BOX LS 13212). 5. THE COORDINATE SYSTEM IS A GROUND-BASED STATE PLANE MODIFIED COORDINATE SYSTEM, NAD 83/92, CENTRAL ZONE 0502 PER CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PUBLISHED VALUES. 6. THE VERTICAL DATUM IS THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD88). 7. THE GROUND TO GRID COMBINED SALE FACTOR IS 0.99974780300, SCALED FROM BASE POINT PHAC 1 (PERMANENT HIGH ACCURACY CONTROL POINT #1) WHICH HAS THE FOLLOWING COORDINATE VALUES PHAC 1: NORTHING: 1701258.75 EASTING: 3118217.58 ELEVATION: 5471.62 8. PER COLORADO REVISED STATUTES SEC. 38-51-106 (L), ALL LINEAL UNITS DEPICTED ON THIS LAND SURVERY PLAT ARE U.S. SURVEY FEET. ONE METER EQUALS 39.37 DIVIDED BY 12 U.S. SURVEY FEET ACCORDING TO THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY. 9. THE GEODETIC POINT COORDINATE DATA SHOWN HEREIN HAS BEEN DERIVED FROM THE COLORADO COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983, CENTRAL ZONE 0502, AND HAS A HORIZONTAL ACCURACY CLASSIFICATION OF 0.04 U.S. SURVEY FEET AT THE 95% CONFIDENCE LEVEL, AS DEFINED IN THE GEOSPATIAL POSITIONING ACCURACY STANDARDS OF THE FEDERAL GEODETIC CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE (FGDC-STD-077.2-1998). 10. THE TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION IS THREE. 11. THE STORM DETENTION AREA HEREON SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED BY THE OWNER AND SUBSEQUENT OWNERS, HEIRS, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. IN THE EVENT THAT SUCH CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE IS NOT PERFORMED BY SAID OWNER, THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO ENTER SUCH AREA AND PERFORM NECESSARY WORK, THE COST OF WHICH SAID OWNER, HEIRS, SUCCESSORS, AND ASSIGNS AGREES TO PAY. NO BUILDING OR STRUCTURE WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE DETENTION AREA AND NO CHANGES OR ALTERATIONS AFFECTING THE HYDRAULIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DETENTION AREA WILL BE MADE WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS. 12. AT THE TIME LOTS 2 IS DEVELOPED THE RUNOFF DRAINING FROM LOT i MAY BE CHANNELIZED OR PIPED TO THE DETENTION POND AND THE ASSOCIATED DRAINAGE EASEMENT MAY BE REDUCED IN SIZE. THE DETENTION POND MAY ALSO BE RECONFIGURED ALONG WITH THE ASSOCIATED DETENTION EASEMENT. 13. SEE TITLE COMMITMENT ABC70207586-2 PREPARED BY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ON FEBRUARY 26, 2008 AT 5:00 P.M. FOR MATTERS RELATED TO TITLE FOR THIS PROPERTY. INDEX OF SHEETS COVER SHEET SHEET 1 FINAL PLAT EXHIBIT SHEET 2 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I, JAMES T. JONES, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARY OF PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION, TRACT 2 REPLAT /2 WAS MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOW-EDGE,INFORMATION AND BELIEF, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE COLORADO STATUTES CURRENT REVISED EDITION AS AMENDED. THE ACCOMPANYING PLAT ACCURATELY REPRESENTS SAID SURVEY. SIGNED THIS LL' DAY OF Z-1--4 201[. A/ lluelz JAlJE AD JONES; PROMSIONAL LAND COLORADO PLS NO. 19606 JONES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIF�1I�C�A��T""ION RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL THIS i� AY OF2!l-&V- ..70// . BY THE VA4�EA_TQRIDGE �PLANNING COMMISSION. CC CHAIRPERSON k egKe CITY CERTIFICATION APPROVED THIS AY OF BY THE WHEAT RIDGE CITY COUNCIL ATTEST CLE M Y P. CIO�°� q� MMUNITY DE iPM DIRECTO ~ � u A DIRECTOR OF a BUC WORKS f + -Kf7� COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE STATE OF COLORADO 55 COUNTY OF JEFFERSON ) ' I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE� CC�UNj�11'' CLERK ATY•'07•'YYO'CLOCK Y AND RECORDER OF JEFFERSON,,CCQQUyyN AT GOLDEN, COLORADO, P M. ON THE �_ DAY OF KF'Kl L 2011; BOOK = PACE RECEPTION NO. n"i0 JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER BY: DEPUTY SITE DATA TOTAL SITE AREA 151,726 SF (3.48 AC) SMALLEST LOT AREA 53,155 SF AVERAGE LOT AREA 75,863 SF LARGEST LOT AREA 98,571 SF CASE HISTORY: CASE NO. WZ-02-12 CASEN0. WZ-03-08 CASE N0. MS -02-07 CASE NO. WZ-10-08 CASE NO. MS -10-04 DATE OF PREPARATION: 1/7/11 FINAL PLAT PARFET PARK SUBDMSION, TRACT 2 REPLAT #2 JOB NO. 10056 DATE: JANUARY 7, 2011 SHEET 1 OF2 JONES ENGINEERING ASSOC., INC. 2120 W. Lit0- Blr&, Suite 2005 Lil0eloe, Colorado 89120 Ph- 303-739-0283 Fax 303-739-0285 -4.zo//o yd9--g0 TION OF TRACT 1, PORTION OF TRACT 1, PARFEPORT PARK MINOR SUBDIVISION IPARFET PARK MINOR SUBDIVISION GRACE MANAGEMENT CORDON W. AND DEBRA M. EATHERTON RECEPTION NO. 83008846 I RECEPTION NO. F0954098 a ZONED PID ZONED PID Iaoa Yo vv n cTa.w i 3 SITE BOUNDARY w jou zF I CLYDE G. AND SHIRLEY J. LO SASSO N89W £ I g m — — RECEPTION NO. 93132904 — — — ZONED A-1 O N I: • FOUND #5 REBAR W/ RED PLASTIC CAP I 3 I o I I TO RONALD R. AND BETTY L ROBIYAILLE I Bx2108,PG14 zyl ZONED A-1 ^ I I I I RAIDNAGE H Yi BY THfi I I— (BENEFlP. I (SAE NOTE 12 I E%. to, UTILITY EASEMEN I 4.8� V) RECOVERED No.5 -- -I RE6AR w//PPus I CM l5 #70941 209' sOUTH 894B�50 W I 4.84' EAST 25.00' I EX. 5' UTIUTY :— EASEMENT I I .6 i E N Irl ANNAROSA AND FRANK W. WEHLNG 04 1 b RECEPTION NO. 75730373 I ZONEDA-1 I u iia I zl I\ I 5.32' ' — I i I — — — — — — �— — — — — — — — — — — — — METZGER THREE LIMITED LIABILITY CO. RECEPTION N0. F0243504 ZONED A-1 NOTE: GAP IN CLEAR CREEK WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT EASEMENT POINT OF COMMENCflffNT- COWR #13309 S 1/4 COR. SEC 16, T35, R69W RECOVERED REBAR W/ 3-1/2' BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX LS #13212 N 711030.76 E 107841.07 FINAL PLAT PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION, TRACT 2 REPLAT A RESUBDIVISION OF PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION TRACT 2 REPLAT i LOCATED IN THE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 16, CENTER SEC. 16, T35, R69W TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COWR f12309 ' 13– OVEREDASS NO CAP ENA AR W/ CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORDO RANGE BOX LS /13212 N RANGE B .45 E 107830.97 I rN I I� I 5' UTIUTY \ DAENT \ LOT 1 (VACANT), CONTAINER SYSTEMS MINOR SUBDIVISION \ LIC INVESTMENTS INC. \ RECEPTION NO. 86126692 \ ZONED PID \ WEST 50TH AVENUE ti a,o.w. (70' R.O.W.) -- - CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE CONTROL POINT PHAC 4 LATITUDE 39'46'57.36407'N LONGITUDE 105'O6'50.59074w N 710604.98 E 109254.74 (CURRENT CITY DATUM) 40 20 0 40 80 SCALE: 1' = 40' (U.S. SURVEY FEET) #2 FINAL PLAT PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION, TRACT 2 REPLAT #2 JOB NO. 10056 DATE: JANUARY 26, 2011 SHEET 2 OF2 J NO ES ENC`INEERING ASSOC\L., INC. 2329Wen M-5heet,5u 105 LiW—,C.I.re 80120 Ph— 303-738-0283 Fu: 303.738.0285 LEGEND SITE BOUNDARY PROPOSED LOT LINE -------- EXISTING EASEMENT — — PROPOSED EASEMENT — — — SECTION LINE O RECOVERED MONUMENT AS NOTED • FOUND #5 REBAR W/ RED PLASTIC CAP LS /31545 #2 FINAL PLAT PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION, TRACT 2 REPLAT #2 JOB NO. 10056 DATE: JANUARY 26, 2011 SHEET 2 OF2 J NO ES ENC`INEERING ASSOC\L., INC. 2329Wen M-5heet,5u 105 LiW—,C.I.re 80120 Ph— 303-738-0283 Fu: 303.738.0285 Legal Description LOT 1, BLOCK 1, PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION, TRACT 2 REPLAT #2, RECEPTION #2011042920 LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORADO. #a0//o41,39a0 ya9-ao// yob y9 toln F C'o%rrzdo *?/= FINAL PLAT PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION, TRACT 2 REPLAT #2 A RESUBDIVISION OF PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION TRACT 2 REPLAT LOCATED IN THE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORADO OWNER'S CERTIFICATE I, DAVID NOSS, BEING THE OWNER OF REAL PROPERTY CONTAINING 3.483 ACRES DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION, TRACT 2, AS PLATTED IN THE RECORDS OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORADO. SAID LAND IS LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTH 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE NOO'13'10-W, 1318.27 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT, BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE S89'46'50'W. 228.33 FEET:W THENCE NOO'13'10', 215.00 FEET; THENCE S89'46'50'W, 25.00 FEET; THENCE NOO'13'10-W, 275.00 FEET; THENCE S89'46'50'W, 275.00 FEET TO THE EAST UNE OF PARFET STREET; THENCE NOO'13'10'W ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 152.50 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF GRACE MANAGEMENT (REC. NO. 83008646); THENCE S694740'E ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 325.D1 FEET TO THE WEST UNE OF EATHERTON (REC. NO. F0954998); THENCE SOO'13'10'E ALONG SAID WEST UNE, 229.77 FEET TO THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID EATHERTON; THENCE N89'46'50'E ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SND TRACT, 203.33 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SW 1/4 SECTION; THENCE SOO'13'10-E ALONG SAID 1/4 SECTION LINE 410.32 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING AN AREA AS DESCRIBED OF 151,726 SQUARE FEET, OR 3.463 ACRES, MORE OR LESS BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 16 MONUMENTED AT BOTH THE SOUTH 1/4 CORNER AND CENTER 1/4 CORNER BY A 3-1/2' BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX LS 013212. SAID UNE BEARS NDO'13'10'W PER THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE COORDINATE SYSTEM. HAVE LAID OUT, SUBDIVIDED, AND PLATTED SAID LAND AS PER THE DRAWING HEREON CONTAINED UNDER THE NAME AND STYLE OF PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION. TRACT 2 REPLAT p2. A SUBDIVISION OF A PART OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO AND BY THESE PRESENTS DO DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE AND THOSE MUNICIPALLY OWNED AND/OR MUNICIPALLY FRANCHISED UTILITIES AND SERVICES THOSE PORTIONS OF REAL PROPERTY SHOWN AS EASEMENTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT FOR ALL SERVICES, THIS INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO TELEPHONE AND ELECTRIC ONES, GAS ONES, WATER AND SANITARY SEWER LINES HYDRANTS, STORM WATER SYSTEMS AND PIPES, DETENTION PONDS, STREET LIGHTS AND ALL APPURTENANCES THERETO. AVID ROSS. OWNER STATE OF COLORADO SS COUNTY OF JEFFERSON ) THE FOREGOING DEDICATION ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS AtU-4AY OF YVVlrfh 20 -LL- BY DAVID NOSS. /W7�EJY HAND AND OF/FIyC,IAL SEAL ��a3 "q VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1"=2000' GENERAL NOTES 1. ACCORDING TO FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP 08001CO330G, DATED AUGUST 16, 1995, THE PROJECT SITE LIES IN ZONE X (UNSHADED), WHICH IS DEFINED AS, `AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN. 2. ANY PERSON WHO KNOWINGLY REMOVES, ALTERS OR DEFACES ANY PUBUC LAND SURVEY MONUMENT OR LAND BOUNDARY MONUMENT OR ACCESSORY, COMMITS A CLASS TWO (2) MISDEMEANOR PURSUANT TO STATE STATUTE 18-4-508, C.R.S. 3. NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. 4. BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE EAST UNE, SW 1/4, SECTION 16 BEARS N913'10'W PER THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE DATUM. IT IS MONUMENTED AT THE CENTER CORNER (CITY CONTROL POINT 12309) BY A FOUND 3-1/4' BRASS CAP ON ALUMINUM MONUMENT IN RANGE BOX LS 13212) AND AT THE SOUTH 1/4 CORNER (CITY CONTROL POINT 13309) BY A FOUND 3-1/4' ALUMINUM CAP ON MONUMENT IN RANGE BOX LS 13212). 5. THE COORDINATE SYSTEM IS A GROUND-BASED STATE PLANE MODIFIED COORDINATE SYSTEM, NAD 83/92, CENTRAL ZONE 0502 PER CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PUBLISHED VALUES. 6. THE VERTICAL DATUM IS THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD88). 7. THE GROUND TO GRID COMBINED SALE FACTOR IS 0.99974780300, SCALED FROM BASE POINT PHAC 1 (PERMANENT HIGH ACCURACY CONTROL POINT //1) WHICH HAS THE FOLLOWING COORDINATE VALUES PHAC 1: NORTHING: 1701258.75 EASTING: 3118217.58 ELEVATION: 5471.62 S. PER COLORADO REVISED STATUTES SEC. 38-51-106 (L), ALL LINEAL UNITS DEPICTED ON THIS LAND SURVERY PLAT ARE U.S. SURVEY FEET. ONE METER EQUALS 39.37 DIVIDED BY 12 U.S. SURVEY FEET ACCORDING TO THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY. 9. THE GEODETIC POINT COORDINATE DATA SHOWN HEREIN HAS BEEN DERIVED FROM THE COLORADO COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983, CENTRAL ZONE 0502, AND HAS A HORIZONTAL ACCURACY CLASSIFICATION OF 0.04 U.S. SURVEY FEET AT THE 95% CONFIDENCE LEVEL, AS DEFINED IN THE GEOSPATIAL POSITIONING ACCURACY STANDARDS OF THE FEDERAL GEODETIC CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE (FGDC-STD-077.2-1998). 10. THE TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION IS THREE. 11. THE STORM DETENTION AREA HEREON SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED BY THE OWNER AND SUBSEQUENT OWNERS, HEIRS, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. IN THE EVENT THAT SUCH CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE IS NOT PERFORMED BY SAID OWNER, THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO ENTER SUCH AREA AND PERFORM NECESSARY WORK, THE COST OF WHICH SAID OWNER, HEIRS, SUCCESSORS, AND ASSIGNS AGREES TO PAY. NO BUILDING OR STRUCTURE WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE DETENTION AREA AND NO CHANGES OR ALTERATIONS AFFECTING THE HYDRAULIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DETENTION AREA WILL BE MADE WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS. 12. AT THE TIME LOTS 2 IS DEVELOPED THE RUNOFF DRAINING FROM LOT 1 MAY BE CHANNELIZED OR PIPED TO THE DETENTION POND AND THE ASSOCIATED DRAINAGE EASEMENT MAY BE REDUCED IN SIZE. THE DETENTION POND MAY ALSO BE RECONFIGURED ALONG WTH THE ASSOCIATED DETENTION EASEMENT. 13. SEE TITLE COMMITMENT ABC70207586-2 PREPARED BY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ON FEBRUARY 26, 2008 AT 5:00 P.M. FOR MATTERS RELATED TO TITLE FOR THIS PROPERTY. INDEX OF SHEETS COVER SHEET SHEET 1 FINAL PLAT EXHIBIT SHEET 2 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE L JAMES T. JONES, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARY OF PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION, TRACT 2 REPLAT A2 WAS MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND TO THE BESiT OF MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMA TON AND BELIEF, IN ACCORDANCE WTH ALL APPLICABLE COLORADO STATUTES, CURRENT REVISED EDITION AS AMENDED, THE ACCOMPANYING PLAT ACCURATELY REPRESENTS SAID SURVEY. SIGNED THIS 41!lt DAY OF "l, -4 . 201[. P,,-7-0- _ _ _ _ 3/iT//i NAME 7. JONES. PRQRSSIONAL LAND COLORADO PLS NO. 19606 JONES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVALTHIS � AY OF /�y� . BY THE WHHEAAT^�RIDGE APLANNING COMMISSION. L� L CHAIRPERSON P e CITY CERTIFICATION APPROVED THIS AY OF BY THE WHEAT RIDGE CITY COUNCIL ATTEST / C M Y MMUNIiY DEVE PM DIRECTO 'moi � � 4s DIRECTOR OF BUC WORKS f -N.13R1'A�- COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE STATE OF COLORADO 55 COUNTY OF JEFFERSON ) I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THEY oiylr CLERK AND RECORDER OF JEFFERSON ,,CCpOU1y�ITY AT GOLDEN, COLORADO, AT O'CLOCK P M. ON THE >J`L DAY OF H PKI L. 20.1L. `7 BOOK - PAGE RECEPTION NO. TYRO / j °%Z9oZO. JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER BY: DEPUTY SITE DATA TOTAL SITE AREA 151,726 SF (3.48 AC) SMALLEST LOT AREA 53.155 SF AVERAGE LOT AREA 75,863 SF LARGEST LOT AREA 98,571 SF CASE HISTORY: CASE NO. WZ-02-12 CASE NO. WZ-D3-08 CASE NO. MS -02-07 CASE NO. WZ-10-08 CASE NO. MS -t0-04 DATE OF PREPARATION: 1/7/11 FINAL PLAT PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION, TRAGI' 2 REPLAT #2 JOB NO. 10056 DATE: JANUARY 7, 2011 SHEET 1 OF 2 JESE NEERING AS , INC 2120 W. LiW- Blvd, SUR. 205 Lit0e1®, C.lm& 80120 Phone: 303-738-0283 F-303.738-0285 58TH AVENUE SUE 3 pOAO ''y' R10� 50TH AVENUE N -o 2P 44TH AVENUE VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1"=2000' GENERAL NOTES 1. ACCORDING TO FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP 08001CO330G, DATED AUGUST 16, 1995, THE PROJECT SITE LIES IN ZONE X (UNSHADED), WHICH IS DEFINED AS, `AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN. 2. ANY PERSON WHO KNOWINGLY REMOVES, ALTERS OR DEFACES ANY PUBUC LAND SURVEY MONUMENT OR LAND BOUNDARY MONUMENT OR ACCESSORY, COMMITS A CLASS TWO (2) MISDEMEANOR PURSUANT TO STATE STATUTE 18-4-508, C.R.S. 3. NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. 4. BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE EAST UNE, SW 1/4, SECTION 16 BEARS N913'10'W PER THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE DATUM. IT IS MONUMENTED AT THE CENTER CORNER (CITY CONTROL POINT 12309) BY A FOUND 3-1/4' BRASS CAP ON ALUMINUM MONUMENT IN RANGE BOX LS 13212) AND AT THE SOUTH 1/4 CORNER (CITY CONTROL POINT 13309) BY A FOUND 3-1/4' ALUMINUM CAP ON MONUMENT IN RANGE BOX LS 13212). 5. THE COORDINATE SYSTEM IS A GROUND-BASED STATE PLANE MODIFIED COORDINATE SYSTEM, NAD 83/92, CENTRAL ZONE 0502 PER CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PUBLISHED VALUES. 6. THE VERTICAL DATUM IS THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD88). 7. THE GROUND TO GRID COMBINED SALE FACTOR IS 0.99974780300, SCALED FROM BASE POINT PHAC 1 (PERMANENT HIGH ACCURACY CONTROL POINT //1) WHICH HAS THE FOLLOWING COORDINATE VALUES PHAC 1: NORTHING: 1701258.75 EASTING: 3118217.58 ELEVATION: 5471.62 S. PER COLORADO REVISED STATUTES SEC. 38-51-106 (L), ALL LINEAL UNITS DEPICTED ON THIS LAND SURVERY PLAT ARE U.S. SURVEY FEET. ONE METER EQUALS 39.37 DIVIDED BY 12 U.S. SURVEY FEET ACCORDING TO THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY. 9. THE GEODETIC POINT COORDINATE DATA SHOWN HEREIN HAS BEEN DERIVED FROM THE COLORADO COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983, CENTRAL ZONE 0502, AND HAS A HORIZONTAL ACCURACY CLASSIFICATION OF 0.04 U.S. SURVEY FEET AT THE 95% CONFIDENCE LEVEL, AS DEFINED IN THE GEOSPATIAL POSITIONING ACCURACY STANDARDS OF THE FEDERAL GEODETIC CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE (FGDC-STD-077.2-1998). 10. THE TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION IS THREE. 11. THE STORM DETENTION AREA HEREON SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED BY THE OWNER AND SUBSEQUENT OWNERS, HEIRS, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. IN THE EVENT THAT SUCH CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE IS NOT PERFORMED BY SAID OWNER, THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO ENTER SUCH AREA AND PERFORM NECESSARY WORK, THE COST OF WHICH SAID OWNER, HEIRS, SUCCESSORS, AND ASSIGNS AGREES TO PAY. NO BUILDING OR STRUCTURE WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE DETENTION AREA AND NO CHANGES OR ALTERATIONS AFFECTING THE HYDRAULIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DETENTION AREA WILL BE MADE WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS. 12. AT THE TIME LOTS 2 IS DEVELOPED THE RUNOFF DRAINING FROM LOT 1 MAY BE CHANNELIZED OR PIPED TO THE DETENTION POND AND THE ASSOCIATED DRAINAGE EASEMENT MAY BE REDUCED IN SIZE. THE DETENTION POND MAY ALSO BE RECONFIGURED ALONG WTH THE ASSOCIATED DETENTION EASEMENT. 13. SEE TITLE COMMITMENT ABC70207586-2 PREPARED BY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ON FEBRUARY 26, 2008 AT 5:00 P.M. FOR MATTERS RELATED TO TITLE FOR THIS PROPERTY. INDEX OF SHEETS COVER SHEET SHEET 1 FINAL PLAT EXHIBIT SHEET 2 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE L JAMES T. JONES, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARY OF PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION, TRACT 2 REPLAT A2 WAS MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND TO THE BESiT OF MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMA TON AND BELIEF, IN ACCORDANCE WTH ALL APPLICABLE COLORADO STATUTES, CURRENT REVISED EDITION AS AMENDED, THE ACCOMPANYING PLAT ACCURATELY REPRESENTS SAID SURVEY. SIGNED THIS 41!lt DAY OF "l, -4 . 201[. P,,-7-0- _ _ _ _ 3/iT//i NAME 7. JONES. PRQRSSIONAL LAND COLORADO PLS NO. 19606 JONES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVALTHIS � AY OF /�y� . BY THE WHHEAAT^�RIDGE APLANNING COMMISSION. L� L CHAIRPERSON P e CITY CERTIFICATION APPROVED THIS AY OF BY THE WHEAT RIDGE CITY COUNCIL ATTEST / C M Y MMUNIiY DEVE PM DIRECTO 'moi � � 4s DIRECTOR OF BUC WORKS f -N.13R1'A�- COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE STATE OF COLORADO 55 COUNTY OF JEFFERSON ) I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THEY oiylr CLERK AND RECORDER OF JEFFERSON ,,CCpOU1y�ITY AT GOLDEN, COLORADO, AT O'CLOCK P M. ON THE >J`L DAY OF H PKI L. 20.1L. `7 BOOK - PAGE RECEPTION NO. TYRO / j °%Z9oZO. JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER BY: DEPUTY SITE DATA TOTAL SITE AREA 151,726 SF (3.48 AC) SMALLEST LOT AREA 53.155 SF AVERAGE LOT AREA 75,863 SF LARGEST LOT AREA 98,571 SF CASE HISTORY: CASE NO. WZ-02-12 CASE NO. WZ-D3-08 CASE NO. MS -02-07 CASE NO. WZ-10-08 CASE NO. MS -t0-04 DATE OF PREPARATION: 1/7/11 FINAL PLAT PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION, TRAGI' 2 REPLAT #2 JOB NO. 10056 DATE: JANUARY 7, 2011 SHEET 1 OF 2 JESE NEERING AS , INC 2120 W. LiW- Blvd, SUR. 205 Lit0e1®, C.lm& 80120 Phone: 303-738-0283 F-303.738-0285 -4_eo//0 ya9ao PORTION OF TRACT 1, PORTION OF TRACT 1, PARFET PARK MINOR SUBDIVISION I PARFET PARK MINOR SUBDIVISION GRACE MANAGEMENT GORDON W. AND DEBRA M. EATHERTON RECEPTION N0. S30OS64B I RECEPTION NO. F0954996 a ZONED PID ZONED PID I�j 1.3 w I OF WHEAT RIDGE CONTROL POINT PHAC 4 O LATITUDE 39'46'67.36407'N I �I 3-1/2" BRASS CAP IN 0 I RANGE BOX LS #13212 CLYDE G. AND SHIRLEY J. LO SASSO NB94650 E N , m RECEPTION N0. 93162904 -------- ZONED A-1 I I r I— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — N .-1---• I RECOVERED MONUMENT AS NOTED • o l � I I i+1 I RONALD R. AND BETTY L. ROBITALLE p , I BK 2108, PG 14 Z^yl ZONED A-1 ^ (DRAINAGE r I� I (BENEFIT I NOTEo-12 (S�E I I EK 10' U7lUn EASEMEN I I_ I " � J 4.6N Y RECOVERED NO.S �-- - �1 REBAR w/Pus I— CAP LS /10941 2.09' SOUTH 89"46'50'W I 4.64' EAST 25 00' I EX. 5' UTILITY I- EASEMENT o I I Vii: I I N ANNAROSA AND FRANK W. WEHLJNG 04 RECEPTION N0. 75730373 I ZONED A-1 I Z F I I\ 1= I i I _ I I I ♦I I L---------------- I METZGER THREE LIMI7ED LIABILITY CO. RECEPTION N0. F0245504 I ZONED A-1 FINAL PLAT PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION, TRACT 2 REPLAT A RESUBDIVISION OF PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION TRACT 2 REPLAT LOCATED IN THE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 16, CENTER SEC. 16, T35, R69W TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, RECOVRED RECOVERED NO 5 REBRASS CAP BAR W/ CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORADO RANGE BOX LS /13212 N 713667.45 l/ E 107630.97 I hN I I / I AND E1tlSTINO 50' YA r WATER DISTRICT EA ENT RECEPTION / 82012940 x V UTIUTY \ ASEMENT LOT 1 (VACANT), CONTAINER SYSTEMS MINOR SUBDIVISION LIC INVESTMENTS INC. RECEPTION N0. 8612BB92 ZONED PID \ _WEST coni AVENUE fL R.O.W. (70' R.ON) POINT OF COMMENCEMENT COWR P3309 S 1/4 COR. SEC 16, T35, R 69 m 1.3 w I OF WHEAT RIDGE CONTROL POINT PHAC 4 O LATITUDE 39'46'67.36407'N RECOVERED REBAR W/ ,1.sY"� 3-1/2" BRASS CAP IN VCITY = LONGITUDE 105'06'50.59074"W N 710604.96 RANGE BOX LS #13212 E 109254.74 N , (CURRENT CITY DATUM) 40 20 0 40 80 SCALE: 1" = 40' (U.S. SURVEY FEET) #2 FINAL PLAT PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION, TRACT' 2 REPLAT #2 JOB NO. 10056 DATE: JANUARY 26, 2011 SHEET 2OF2 J N_'RING INC 2329WealM=SR ,Sw 105 Liul w, Colm & 80120 P600e:303-738-0283 Fu:303.738-0285 ,1.sY"� LEGEND SITE BOUNDARY PROPOSED LOT UNE -------- EXISTING EASEMENT — — PROPOSED EASEMENT — - - SECTION LINE O RECOVERED MONUMENT AS NOTED • FOUND 05 REBAR W/ RED PLASTIC CAP LS 031545 #2 FINAL PLAT PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION, TRACT' 2 REPLAT #2 JOB NO. 10056 DATE: JANUARY 26, 2011 SHEET 2OF2 J N_'RING INC 2329WealM=SR ,Sw 105 Liul w, Colm & 80120 P600e:303-738-0283 Fu:303.738-0285 EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS EASEMENT AGREEMENT is for the conveyance of Fire Department ingress and egress through a gate to be installed on the property and fence line as indicated in the drawings attached hereto and incorporated herein by this Exhibit A and Exhibit B, FREMAR INDUSTRIAL PARK, LLP,(the Grantor) is the owner of property with a legal description of: Parfet Park Minor located at 5150 Parfet Street, Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 (the Property). The Grantor does hereby grant a perpetual, exclusive easement to Parfet Storage, LLC (the Grantee) for an ingress and egress gate to be installed onthe property1fence lines as indicated in the attached Exhibit A and Exhibit B drawings which are hereby incorporated herein. The ingress and egress easement gate to be used only by the Fire Department. 1. Asa condition for the easement to be granted, Parfet Storage, LLC located at 5130 Parfet Street, Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 having a legal description of Lots I and 2, Parfet Park Subdivision, Tract 2 Replat #2, County ofJefferson, State of Colorado, must pay for the construction costs, maintenance and snow removal of the fire lane apron which will be constructed on the Property of the Grantor which is the 5150 Parfet Street, Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 and which, as stated, has a legal description of Parfet Park Minor. The Grantor shall also allow the Fire Department to use their drive as a fire lane. 2. It is agreed that as part of this Easement Agreement. that Parfet Storage, LLC, its successors, transferees and assigns shall also have access to the apron through the property described herein for maintenance and related purposes. 3. Also, it is agreed that as a condition for granting this ingress and egress gate easement to Parfet Storage, LLC, Parfet Storage, LLC agrees to pay to the Grantor the sum of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000). 4. The easement conveyed above shall be perpetual and shall be binding upon and shall enure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their successors, transferees and assigns. 5. Because of the consideration to be furnished by Parfet Storage, LLC.'asset forth in this perpetual easement, Parfet Storage, LLC shat I be a required signatory to this Agreement for agreeing to carry out its obligations pursuant to this Easement. 6. Grantor shall have, during the continuance of this Easement, the right to dispose of the Property and to use the Property for other purposes provided such use does not materially interfere with the easement granted herein. In the event Grantor shall, in the future, wish to grant additional easements or rights-of-way which encroach upon the easement granted herein, Grantee expressly agrees and covenants it will consent to share the Property, provided the proposed additional easements or rights-of-way do not materially interfere with the purposes for which this easement is granted. 7. Grantee may not use this grant of easement for any purpose other than that which is specifically described herein. If the Property is used by Grantee for any purpose other than stated herein, the easement is automatically terminated, and all of the right, title and interest of Grantee (and Grantee's successors or assigns) in and to the Property become null and void, and the Property shall absolutely revert to and revest in Grantor as fully and completely as if this instrument had not been executed, without the necessity for suit or re-entry and Grantee shall remove improvements as provided above. No act or omission on the part of any beneficiary of this paragraph shall be a waiver of the operation or enforcement of the paragraph. 8. Grantee agrees to comply with all rules, regulations and policies authoritatively promulgated pertaining to the use of the Property, 9. Grantor and Grantee agree that this Easement Agreement including all exhibits, supersedes any and all prior written or oral agreements, and there are no covenants or agreements between the parties except as set forth herein with respect to the use of the Property by Grantee. No prior or contemporaneous addition, deletion, or other amendment hereto shall have any force or effect whatsoever unless embodied herein in writing. No subsequent amendment hereto shall have any force or effect unless embodied in a written agreement executed and approved by the officials and officers of the State of Colorado as required by the Colorado Revised Statutes, as arnended, or such assistants as they may designate. 10. Parfet Storage, LLC shall be responsible for recording this Easement Agreement with the Clerk and Recorder's Office in the county or counties in which the Property is located. Parfet Storage, LLC shall provide the Grantor with a confirmed copy of the recorded easement. 11. Any notice required or permitted by this Easement Agreement may be delivered in person or sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, to the party at the address as h erei n after provided, and if sent by mail it shall be effective when posted in the U.S, Mail Depository with sufficient postage attached thereto: Grantor: Fremar Industrial Park, LLP 2200 East 104" A ve.,# 10 5 Thornton, Colorado 80233 Grantee: Parfet Storage, LLC 5130 Parfet Street Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Notice of change of address shall be treated as any other notice. 12. If any part of this Easement Agreement is found, decreed or held to be void or unenforceable, the remainder of the provisions of this Easement Agreement shall not be affected Page 2 of 3 thereby and shall remain in full force and effect. 13. This Easement Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Colorado. 14. Each party who is a signatory to this Easement Agreement has been authorized by its partnership or company, as the case may be, to enter into this Easement Agreement, On request, the applicable entity will provide written documentation that it is authorized to enter into the Easement Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Easement Agreement is hereby executed by the Grantor on this - day of 2015. FREMAR INDUSTRIAL PARK, LLP By: Parfet Storage, LLC, as Grantee, does hereby agree to be bound by the provisions set forth in this Easement. PARFET STORAGE, LLC By: Date Page 3 of 3 PARFET STREET MM STORAGE LOTS I AND 2, PARFET PARK SURDTVISION, TRACT 2, REPLAT #2, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO R6fR2jGFNCV AM= EASENENT PROPOSED 'EMERGENCY I ACCESS EASEMENT i 5130 PARFET STREET LEGEND SUBJECT PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED EASEMENT 54 'y(\ 24' EX. PROPERTY BOUNDARY 0 Mi GRAPH;C SCALE 20 20 40 (IN FEET) INCH = 20 FT P40� ARM MRAm uc ELIDE, f% AHEAi E7KCA 400Y aufn RlaE'+T' fr0merf" - main - surwoo PARFET STOAGE MINI STORAGE 5130 PARFET STREET *too . *W I WFRUNCY Ai:aSS EASEMENT "N F� n z 0 F- L) uj Q) 0 o cr U 0 Q t. 0 0 U") 0 9?12 I LU ui cr- LU LL LL a- 0 M 'OL t4 V tod 1 oos w W cr. 0 -C) M r,00,00 406 N LL cr- CL 1 '00 ga, M,00,00.06 N z 0 F- L) uj Q) 0 o cr U 0 Q t. 0 0 U") 0 9?12 I LU ui cr- LU LL LL a- 0 M 'OL t4 V tod 1 oos October 15, 2015 City of Wheat Ridge Public Works Engineering Division 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 RE: Parfet Mini Storage — Access Grade Variance Request To whom it may concern: "'WASELINE Engineering Planning - Surveying We are hereby requesting variance from the Public Works commercial driveway maximum grades shown per the Access Grades Detail (S -D01). The maximum slope of 8% is not achievable along the access drive that links Lot 1 and the future development on Lot 2. We are proposing a grade of 12% max on the short access that links the two properties. This segment is entirely on private property and will be privately maintained. Not allowing the variance would result in extreme earthwork fill quantities on the future phase and make the property financially unviable. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property with this application, which would not be possible without the variance to allow reasonable access to the future phase. Granting this variance would not alter the essential character of the property. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located. This variance request has been prepared in conformance with the Wheat Ridge Criteria. We appreciate your consideration and please feel free to contact us with any questions. Sincerely, Baseli a Engineering Corporation Noah J Nemmers PE Manager of Civil Engineering\ Golden G-gaxzq —J—q 4<83 DIgVkik J2# rYFIU;3734 Sk 636k73k<99 Id{ e6k73k<8< Kl M" c G-qx Cwd' 0 :43 4tkD1.� 438 Jdhhl/F1rn ;3964 S7t <:3b851:933 Id{ <:3358G]:934 t iWh tjh 74<Rd'iVAtk/SRErf ::3485 VkdpF3dAbIUjA� ;37:: Sk <:31; : c11; 58 Id{ ; 99F 7 k439 V� Special Warranty Deed THIS DEED, made on August 1, 2014 by GORDON EATHERTON Grantor, of the count y of ARAPAHOE and State of COLORADO, for the consideration of ($455,000.00)*** Four Hundred Fifty -Five Thousand and 00/100***dollars in hand paid, hereby sells and conveys to PARFET STORAGE, LLC, Grantee, whose street address is 14995 FOOTHILL ROAD, GOLDEN, CO 80401, county of JEFFERSON, state of COLORADO, the following real property in the County of Jefferson, and State of Colorado, to wit: LOTS 1 AND 2, PARFET PARK SUBDIVISION, TRACT 2 REPLAT #2, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO, also known as: 5130 PARFET 5T WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 with all its appurtenances and warrants the title against all persons claiming under the Grantor and EXCEPTTAXES FOR THE YEAR OF CLOSING; AND EXCEPT FOR THOSE EXCEPTIONS INDENTIFIED ON EXHIBIT A ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART OF THIS DEED. Gordon Eatherton State of )ss County of ) IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIilllllllllllilllllllllllillll D $21.00 2014076043 IIIIIIIIIII ®545.50 09/10/2014 11:03:33 AM 3 Page(s) JEFFERSON COUNTY, Colorado The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of /- U # By GORDON EATHERTON� o� G I C/ i Witness my hand and official seal. �-- My commission expires: C� • :— Notary Publi When recorded return to: Gregory Herbers 14995 FOOTHILL ROAD GOLDEN, CO 80401 City of at WheIidge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Wheat Ridge Community Development Department PRE -APPLICATION MEETING SUMMARY Meeting Date: April 16, 2015 Applicant: Greg Herbers 5130 Parfet Street Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 303-717-0378 gaherbersgq.com Allan Mckinster amckinster@hotmail.com Attending Staff: Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner Joshua Botts, Planner I Dave Brossman, Development Review Engineer Steve Art, Economic Development Manager Specific Site Location: 5130 Parfet Street (PIN 39-16-01-010), East side of Parfet Street, (PIN 39-16-01-011) Existing Zoning: Industrial -Employment (IE) and Agricultural -One (A-1) Existing Comp. Plan: Employment Existing Site Conditions: The property is located at 5130 Parfet Street, between Ridge Road and W. 50th Avenue extended. The site consists of one developed parcel, 39-16-01-010 (Lot 1), and one undeveloped parcel, 39-16-01-011 (Lot 2). Lot 1 is zoned Planned Industrial Development (PID), with a single -story 1135 square foot office building, and a detached garage. Other improvements on the northern portion include parking, landscaping and a small, screened outdoor storage area. Lot 2 is split by two zoning districts. The northern half is Planned Industrial Development (PID), and the southern half is Agricultural -One (A-1). Lot 1 is relatively flat terrain and connects to Lot 2 through a steep and narrow sliver of land. Lot 2 has a considerable grade change with an estimated 13% grade at certain points. Both lots are under common ownership and equal approximately 3.5 acres in area. Surrounding properties include a variety of land uses and zoning. To the west is a transmission substation which is zoned A-1. Abutting the property to the southwest are three parcels (5120, 5110, and 5006 Parfet Street) all zoned Agriculture -One (A-1) with single family, greenhouse and farming uses. To the north and east of the property are developments zoned PID, which have a variety of office/warehouse and manufacturing uses. The property south of Lot 2 is an undeveloped parcel zoned Planned Commercial Development (PCD). Applicant/Owner Preliminary Proposal: The applicant is proposing to develop the Lot 1 for the construction and operation of a mini - warehousing storage business. The applicant is proposing to build seven new (7) storage structures that total 16,160 square feet of new construction. The applicant's site plan also includes the converted home serving as an office without modification. Building A runs a 100' parallel to Parfet Street. Building G borders the northern property line and runs 230' with west/east orientation. Buildings B, C, D, E, F are stacked internally and are offset twenty-four (24') from each other. The proposed storage unit will be accessed by one existing curb cut Parfet Street at the southern end of the property. The applicant is proposing a security gate a few feet off of Parfet Street. A twenty-four foot (24') driveway running west to east along the southern property line connects the access with six of the seven storage buildings and the existing office building. The southern driveway is connected to four (4) drives that run and south between the buildings. The aforementioned north/south drives connect to a northern drive that runs along the south side of the northern building (Building G). An existing fifty foot (50') Valley Water District Easement along the eastern property line is undevelopable. This easement runs roughly 230' north and south. The applicant is proposing to place nine (9) parking spaces, a trash dumpster area, and an emergency gate in this easement. A six foot high chain link with slats fence will surround the perimeter of the property. A 6x8' sign is being proposed at the entrance facing Parfet Street. Will a neighborhood meeting need to be held prior to application submittal? No, a neijzhborhood meeting is not required for an application for planned building group. Planning comments: The following items were discussed based on the applicant's proposal: Zoning The site was rezoned to Industrial -Employment (I -E) in 2014. The I -E zone district is established to encourage light manufacturing, storage, warehouse, and other industrial uses. The I -E zone district has specific design requirements that address parking, landscape, and screening requirements. 2 Parking/Surfacing Section 26-501 of the code establishes minimum parking requirements and dimensions for parking stalls and aisles. The development plan for the mini -warehouses will have to be considered based on amount of parking for customers, circulation space and parking required for the office. Accessible parking must be accommodated as well. Handicapped parking should be provided at a minimum rate of 1 per every 25 required off-street parking spaces and also be placed closer to the existing home/office. By City Code, all non-residential properties that are subject to wheeled traffic for access, parking, sales or storage, shall be properly graded for drainage. These areas shall be surfaced with concrete, asphalt or brick pavers. The subject site will need to be surfaced as appropriate. Staff has also requested the applicant to move the access/entrance gate further inwards to the east to allow for more stacking and preventing customers and employees from stacking onto Parfet Street in the event that multiple cars attempt to access the site simultaneously. Landscaping/Screening Section 26-502 establishes minimum requirements for landscaping. Redevelopment of the site will require that many of the landscaping improvements installed by the prior owner to be removed. Staff is particularly concerned about existing mature trees that may need to be removed and encourages the retention of these trees if possible. In addition to street trees at a rate of one tree for every 30' of street frontage, 15% of the property must be landscaped and have one tree and ten shrubs for every 1,000 square feet of required landscape area. All landscaped areas shall be irrigated with an automated sprinkler system. Up to 35% of the required landscaped area may be non -living. The property to the south of the subject site is zoned Agricultural -One (A-1). All nonresidential uses located adjacent to residentially zoned areas or agriculturally zoned areas shall provide a screened or landscaped buffer area consisting of either or both of the following: A six-foot (6') high solid fence or landscaped hedge with a mature height of six (6') feet. A strip of land at least fifteen (15') wide planted with a variety of vegetation and a minimum density of one (1) shrub or tree per every two (2) linear feet of buffer area adjacent to the residential or agricultural zoned property. Architectural and Site Design Manual The purpose of the ASDM is to provide effective design and planning guidance for the design and physical appearance of Wheat Ridge's commercial, industrial, mixed-use, and multi -family residential buildings and sites. If this purpose is fulfilled, Wheat Ridge's commercial corridors will become more attractive and successful and Wheat Ridge will become more desirable, livable city for residents, businesses, and visitors. Quality design and planning will provide a positive image, vibrant environment, and increased revenue to the City. The building design standards for heavy commercial/light industrial structures will apply (section 4.2 of the ASDM). One of the requirements of the ASDM is all building facades within 0 to 50' of the public street must meet the following design standards related to fagade design, materials, transparency, and screening. The ASDM is available for download from the City's website:http://www.ci.wheatrid ge. co.us/DocumentCenter/HomeNiew/5 8 8. Architectural elevations will be reviewed at the time of planned building group review. Staff has requested that fagade improvements on the western, northern and southern sides of Building A, and the southern facades on buildings B, C, and D. Public Works comments: The following items were discussed based on the applicant's proposal: Public Improvements Since no Public Improvements currently exist along Parfet Street on either side of the subject property, fees in the amount of $7,983.38 will be taken in lieu of construction of the required Public Improvements along the 152.5' Parfet Street frontage. The fees will be due prior to issuance of the Building Permit. Drainage Site drainage requirements are based on the area of disturbance created by new development. The more impervious surface (such as paved parking and buildings) that is added to the site, the greater the drainage requirements will be. In either scenario, drainage documents shall be signed and sealed by a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Colorado. If the applicant disturbs 3,000-9,999 square feet of existing impervious surface or adds 3,000- 9,999 square feet of new impervious surface, this project will be considered a Moderate Redevelopment under the Site Drainage Requirements. All Moderate Redevelopment requires a Drainage Letter and Drainage Plan with sufficient calculations to address the 100% water quality capture volume for the added impervious surface on1X. The Drainage Plan must contain sub - basin info, flow arrows and percent grades, and show the WQ facility. If the applicant disturbs 10,000 square feet or more of existing impervious surfaces or increases the impervious area by 10,000 square feet or more, the project will be considered a Major Redevelopment under the Site Drainage Requirements. All Major Redevelopments must submit a Final Drainage Report and Plan describing how full storm water flood attenuation detention incorporating water quality measures for the entire site will be achieved. A full report and plan following the mandatory outline found in the Site Drainage Requirements shall be required. Permeable Pavers or PICP's are acceptable under the City's Standards for improved surfacing and drainage. Since it was stated that this site is to be completed in phases, Public Works suggests that the drainage be engineered for the full build -out condition. If this method is chosen, a full Final 11 Drainage Report and Plan will be required. The Report must include the proposed changes to the existing pond and describe in detail the necessary modifications for each phase. If the area of the disturbance will meet or exceed one (1) acre, then a Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) associated with the required CDPS Permit shall be submitted to the City of Wheat Ridge for review and approval. The SWMP must be approved by the City prior to issuance of any Building Permits. The CDPS Permit is generally obtained by the contractor at time of Building Permit Application and a copy must accompany the final submittal of the SWMP. Increasing the lot coverage with impervious surfaces will increase the demand for a more efficient storm water runoff and retention system. If the site is developed to the maximum 85% lot coverage permitted by the I -E zone district, the current sheet flow system may not suffice. ROW Dedication A twenty -foot (20') strip of Right -of -Way along the southerly portion of Lot 2 will be required with the development of Lot 2. This is to allow for future construction of W. 501h Avenue to the west of Oak Street, and will provide better access to Lot 2. Building Division comments: A representative of the building division was not present. The City has adopted and currently enforces the 2012 Edition of the International Codes and the 2014 Edition of the National Electrical Code and enforces the 2009-A117.1 ANSI Standard for Accessible and Usable Buildings in determining requirements related to building accessibility. Designs should conform to the requirements of these codes. Please refer to the Building Division's permit submittal checklist for additional information: http://www.ci.wheatridge.co.us/1068/Permit-Submittal- Information. Questions related to the requirements of the International Fire Code should be directed to the appropriate fire district in which the property is located. If the existing office does not currently meet requirements for accessibility, modifications may need to be made prior to structure occupancy. PBG Process The first step in the Planned Building Group (PBG) process began with the pre -application meeting on April 16, 2015. After the pre -application meeting is held, a formal application may be submitted. The submittal must include a professionally prepared site plan and building elevations in accordance with the requirements of Section 26-111. of the zoning and development code. Upon submittal of a complete application, the application will be referred to other departments and utility companies for 15 days. During the referral period the case manager assigned to the PBG will also review and make comments on the project. When the referral is complete the case manager will send back review comments from all referral agencies to inform the applicant of issues that need to be addressed. These comments will need to be addressed. Once all comments and requirements have been met, the PBG application can be scheduled for public hearing in front of Planning Commission. The Planning Commission is a body of appointed Wheat Ridge citizens that reviews various land use proposals and makes recommendations to City Council. Publication in the Wheat Ridge Transcript, notice to adjacent landowners within 300 -feet, and posting of the property with signs are required prior to the Planning Commission hearing. The City will coordinate the publication, will mail the notices of the hearing, and will provide the applicant with the posting signs. The notifications and postings must occur at least 15 days prior to the public hearing. The case manager will prepare a staff report which will be presented at the Planning Commission public hearing. After the staff report is given, the applicant and members of the audience will be allowed to give testimony regarding the application. The decision by the planning commission will be considered final. Appeals from a decision of the planning commission shall be to the Jefferson County District Court as specified in the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedures. Please keep in mind that public hearings are quasi-judicial in nature. Please do not contact Planning Commissioners or City Council members to discuss the merits of the case prior to the public hearing. Such communication could jeopardize their ability to hear the case. It was also noted by staff that existing code violations on the property will need to be remediated prior to acceptance and processing of the PBG plan. Utility Providers The City of Wheat Ridge is not a full-service city. The utility and service providers for this property include: • Valley Water, phone: 303-424-2844 • Fruitdale Sanitation, phone: 303-424-7252 • Arvada Fire District #1, phone: 303-403-5900 All land use applications will be sent on referral to these agencies for comment; however staff encourages potential applicants to contact service districts ahead of time. This may help to understand any design or infrastructure requirements and potential costs associated with the proposed project. Please be aware that the above comments are for general information purposes only. Staff cannot predict the outcome of any land use development application. A favorable response from staff does not obligate any decision-making body (Community Development Director, Public Works Director, Planning Commission and/or City Council) to a desired outcome. Staff will provide the best advice available given existing regulations, current policy, political climate and information submitted. Attachments: Public Works Handouts Phone Numbers Meredith Reckert — Senior Planner 303-235-2848 Eli Joshua Botts — Planner I 303-235-2849 Dave Brossman — Development Review Engineer 303-235-2864 Steve Art — Economic Development Manager 303-235-2806 Of Jhei- El GmRJ� WE TO TPL u !;i -- ------------------- 44. ------------------ 6Ai City of ��qr Wheat I�dge LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION Community Development Department 7500 West 29th Avenue • Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 • Phone (303) 235-2846 Greg Herbers (Please print or type all information) Applicant PARFET STORAGE LLC City Golden Owner Same as above City Address 14995 Foothill Rd Phone 3-717-0378 State CO Zip 80401 Fax gherbers@q.com Address State Zip Phone Fax ContactNoah Nemmers - Baseline Corp Address 1950 Ford Steet Phone 3-940-9966 City Golden State CO Zip 80401 Fax noah@baselinecorp.c (The person listed as contact will be contacted to answer questions regarding this application, provide additional information when necessary, post public hearing signs, will receive a copy of the staff report prior to Public Hearing, and shall be responsible for forwarding all verbal and written communication to applicant and owner.) Location of request (address): 5130 Parfet Street LOT 1, Block 1, PARFET PARK TRACT 2 REPLAT #2 Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request): Please refer to submittal checklists for complete application requirements; incomplete applications will not be accepted. O Change of zone or zone conditions O Special Use Permit O Subdivision: Minor (5 lots or less) O Consolidation Plat O Conditional Use Permit O Subdivision: Major (More than 5 lots) O Flood Plain Special Exception X Site Plan approval O Temporary Use, Building, Sign O Lot Line Adjustment O Concept Plan approval O Variance/Waiver (from Section ) X Planned Building Group O Right of Way Vacation O Other: Detailed description of request: Six proposed storage buildings and the existing office/home on the site is to be used as a office/home for the on site manager. Site Plan request limited to Lot 1 of Parfet Park Subdivision. Lot 2 (Future Phase) is shown as part of the grading and drainage scope to the existing detention pond on Lot 2. Required information: Assessors Parcel Number: 39-163-01-010 Size of Lot (acres or square footage): 1.22 Current Zoning: Industrial -Employment (I -E) Proposed Zoning: No Change Current Use: Light Industrial / Commercial Proposed Use: No Change I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above, without whose consent the requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners must submit power. -,9f -attorney from tllowner which approved of this action on his behalf. Notarized Signature of Applican State of Colorado } ss County of71t47e' The foregoing instrument (Land Use Processing Application) was acknowledged -ire this day of 201J by 61teo A . r�c�,� $T A Notary Publ'c 15 3 My commission expirevC,� /g /20 - To be filled out by staff: n Date received 10-L&-1,5- Fee $ 00 Receipt No. Case No. I" Q G - i S - G 1 Comp Plan Design. Zoning .l: --\A,,, Gr. A ioyM on T-06uarter Section Map S W !(o Related Case No. Pre -App Mtg. Date Case Manager keckec-+